The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 05/14/1996 PR , -wk ' - - - i CITY F TIG D 1 OREGON t' 7 S TIGARD CITY COUNCIL P t MEETING MAY 142 1996 T K ?4~. ~ Y 5 x P~ COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE TELEVISED T y fj" 1Aadmljotccpktl.doc - x ~ y 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 I ? ' ~F } F 5' t}"' - T~ -~.~'4 {j k - _ _ ;1 q 1~ E , " , , , , , ' ' - , ~ ~ ~ ~ i E b F,y.F~~y {4. j 4 4 'y .2S y ?T 4 - 2 d - t ' .Y 4 ~F x -~ri - .e.. a~...~.+~....aa....?~~....W. t y _ ere -F s -ix? _ i - ' P~ - _t _ -+Y :d l' S sot t - 4 _ _ rt „ ¢ . t 1 F _ CITY OF TIGARD .i qty 7 131E^~ryy//g~a 4 t`p=~ y%-.~ s - "F <.I7,tV1i y am 9 F j y d 4~a,t 1W ~i~ DJ•<`,`u•'`;>~\ 0 ,ae\ 5 ~~21 Y '1 s F a7Fa/t ~tC~~f~~Y'i s ]mayy t~J)y~yy a Z ; ~ „a. €y.-, \ \ a - tY A - xY § $ ts, - % ,r - - _ tt kL xJ PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on th e tt _ appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the I Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be 4 two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting k~, f° 4 4 ky , ; ill~~_ either the Mayor or the City Administrator. y ` , , I Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying f „,5 7 T be present 7:15 m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet Business ag V items can be heard in an order after 7:30 T y °.m. ' ,~5N'R t Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and c~ should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the a ; Council meeting. Please call 639.4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - x Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). ; x x t ,T _ z Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:` r { ~ g k -11 - ! . - _•t ref t ; r = Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearingF' # I impairments; and ' """z "'2 , % t Qualified bilingual interpreters. { Y i 4 ;i Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is } i _ ' x t important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your ' ` need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone L. k " numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - 't R y , ° Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). " 7 x ` } n L.y 3 t _ `s.. i_ SEE ATTACHED AGENDA r if 4g x, r s ~~-n ti 'F-- M1 X' COUNCIL AGENDA - May 14, 1996 - PAGE 1 ; `1141n~ _211_1'16~_'~~'~~ 14~11_1?"t_~', , J Fz,',.,'.- tK~~A;'i-r'M~~5"T~~' ' - - 1 J S [ " {4 M k p - } - ) y Y{ - i - , U , - ~ ~ ir,.. , , " ~ ~ " . ~ L~ r ~ ~ r ~"r ' j , k $ 11 Cr 4a _ - ` E t 7 yam fy3 { G _ j S E S F 5 _ - - r 3 j Z g ] ,N+3f A§ + - - ~ - ~f 1 s x& Ty c- - r y r - L - 5 _ x~ s a^,a p xzfflm w ,~;'~~,~~zi,*,~~,~'~.",:,g"~.'!~',.-";"",,Z~',, s - , , - , - ~ ~ ~ ~ , , i " , ~ - . I - " - ~ : . , - ~ ~ ~ I.F~ -,-!~tl - - ' 't i a r ss sM,n c ` mow.. * a .r..r- - £ - Z - ~r¢ r,}- _ y s"t y' - Y_ 3 - t - S K , ,P ,4 cTr Y* 0. J ........w.wYV'sa.k'x. .,-J .,J, • - y a+ 4 ,8_F` U'z' w.,a. t tip',, s M~ AGENDA , 31 - , TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING y } 1 4M 4-, ` `t s F 6:30 p.m. , ~ f x STUDY MEETING s > > Report on City Hall Roof o- x__ r w z 01, Discussion on Budget Committee Vacancy Applications k > Election Information Training ~ r4Y 3 > Discussion on Ballot Measure 31 a , -r ear 7:30 p.m. ; =n 1. BUSINESS MEETING 4f 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board "u,'k.~Q_ti~l . ~F,, ` t {ti , L L a s 1.2 ROII C811 ~ k a 11 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance L x g gam, r 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports ~x F x ` L M ! 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items? k A - ; 7:35 p.m. -a v T t t hr " . t~ tf - N, 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) y d'~ r r _ 7:45p.m. ',0;,n T 4 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be e5=£. ~'t °t f G enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request ` *R N that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.` 3 'r y x rm _ _ Motion to: fir. # ~y ~ > 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: April 9, 16 and 23, 1996 y ? ~ ~~rr 3.2 Receive and File: . } I I ~ u 3=.~ s a. Council Calendars ; . b. Tentative Agenda .,I s ,rte: 3.3 Appoint M. JoAnn Hayes as Deputy City Recorder -Res. No. 96- 3.4 Adopt Fee Schedule for Land Use Application -Res. No. 96- R, r ` 3.5 Approve Purchase of Ross Street Right-of--Way -Res. No. 96- R T ~ r.. • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion: Any ~,j j, items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate - f ~ - - 4 r{ t discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted fr + on those items which do not need discussion. - _ , v _ 7:45 p.m. a - i , F ' K 4. REPORT ON OREGON FLOOD SUPPORT SERVICES OF WASHINGTON -;~g C y COUNTY 4 t r • Ron Carl zx~ Y"` -Vst~ 8:05 p.m. 111T,_- a g,, , _ 5. DISCUSSION OF VISIONING PROJECT - n" ; Assistant to the City Administrator and Administrative AnalystiRisk,Zr °'..l ,e a' I 5 r COUNCIL AGENDA -May 14, '1896 -PAGE 2 , yI- - t w5 . ~ , ' «r s-_%; - 4 r-- 'E- f I , 41£x, f -t- f - t - ~Z~ v` Y f'~ v} xrf f_ SJ r t A Q a7'"". r LL E , ~ ~ - -1 "I L" , - . , - - - - - I ~ ~ ~ " rr+- r r fi 'R - P 'r t .(q k _ y _ y,p t A !W [ r ~ L-: - . ~ r - I ~ r , In - - , I I ~ I ~ . I , . , . ~ I - ~ , , v - 1 L'i T's' 'Y -'ty _ _ V'.-. Imo _ _ y _ y c- t t k T 2A, t i e .mz,.. n,s...e.L.__, k.~.w'.._,,,,s n.;.m. - - - - °r '"tK r x '4zF tfir- -r- / t ,s'. a ~ Utz y ,ti - - -'dTk-%. P-'. 1 - 8:30 p.m. - - r- r - - -N - rr 6. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - L E ALBERTSON'S INC./DUNCOMBE Land Use Board of Appeals (CUBA) - ' - - ' E ; ?h-- s. Remand Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) z': 93-0009/Zone Change a- Fa"4 (ZON) 93-0003; Site Development Review (SDR) 93-0014/Minor Land ~,~Fu, 11 , Partition (MCP) 93-0013 + _ ,:4w - c , a. Comirme Public Hearin¢ _ Ff-r°>*re i - . ' ~s x x b. Staff Report: Community Development Department f - C. Public Testimony (Rebuttal Phase) d. Staff Recommendation ~ "T4~ " e. Council Questions p-`, -Np':- f. Close Public Hearing ? T } - { - F.' : - g. Council Consideration 'x - i "k `,..,3F= ` . a t 4- ti 9:00 p.m. P 1'3:a:r~R 3 x 9 7. PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) -ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT a, 6 `E-I r (ZOA) 96-0003- DEDICATION, RESERVATION AND IMPACT STUDY =s ~ a~"g;'~~g ~ REQUIREMENTS k'~" F~ N `x The City of Tigard proposes amendments to the Community Development kz _ ry - . w -">Code Sections 18.32.050 8.518.32.250 E.2, 18.96.010 A. and ` Q Vi I ' 18.96.100 A. and B. to require impact study, reservation and dedication r z ~~k r requirements for public facilities and services. LOCATION: City Wide. - t ` ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning . V rs a}'g Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a., ti , r, 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 3, 7 and 8; Community Development Code Chapter t 18.30. b a , xtr~ 7 a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges *~z . C. Staff Report: Community Development Department E ~ r f F d. Public Testimony (Proponents, Opponents) e. Staff Recommendation , E " f. Council Questions ~ K .02 g. Close Public Hearing I h. Council Consideration 9:20 p.m. ~r a, > S S. PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET r To discuss a proposed supplemental budget for 1995/96- The first notice jk~ ~ ' k rrrr of the supplemental budget hearing and financial summary was published in f ' _ ~r ' the Oregonian on Tuesday, April 30, 1996. A copy of the proposed ; < ' "I -11111 -11- supplemental budget document may be inspected or obtained at Tigard City , s ' R. Hall between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. a. Open Public Hearing - r b. Declarations or Challenges < t ' C. Staff Report: Community Development Department - r a d. Public Testimony ` x F e. Staff Recommendation 'NI I' t t a r ( x - .yP -i ? I 1 y S mar 'F-7- { b _ COUNCIL AGENDA -May 14, 1996 - PAGE 3 ~ - 'T, ~3, c , f u - z 1 Z k 1 3S C S T F - 17"-", , I,F U - L I ' L L - I I . - ~ I ~ ' , , * . ',~;r"'Iq~'~ -It~ ) - _ y ; a Mks ri'I E yv l 4 l fin, F r.a S4, f iii a t .r F t; I ~ - ~~li at+ 1 1 i i ~ I 1 kC 1- 1+. 1 Y.. J '.f n ® } J f } ~ 1} ~ 7 t , Y I rt S' ~ r;~3 r r G r c ~ Pik k .ILi~W~, •..l.+uva~~.....ty ',tl .-.-L i.,:v J~.. J •r ' )r.,"'.+ + 3' { r a'"d , , . , .r - . , ! U1. ~,'w1 +nc s.a.kwyrl ` ^r' a~ M r Wl~ b !a- : rarv t§r • rr~ *n v ,a*'t~ _ c P k `~£'~y,.., Y 'Wf•• r~a err, "1 Aft 4'R.'k 'i 7.`<u - ;,Yafr~ ~'q` ems 4 ,kt, ' Y° ",r:, h1 "n.t.,a;€' c4; •z., -Y',.,. , d: ~ .mod -ra r~' ;'~a z~ ,kt= db}'~'ki,-+ ~kb~; I~ a s::° *x`~, 'i a, -=w~^ .'~sd K~: s:, a-. ~.,<'+x •'T 3&k :'ih-, y,,~ i6~ ~ ~ .c+.,..'7a r :?f'4n . ~ F,av. ..^et .n R; - v..8. " , 7 i't'=r t e - .,S•',a r#w,- ,PM ,an, - -,y^;, .T•, k, ""~,S a t. ^'rt*, '7:,nt"C «.a{,.5 •;t. ~F. ~ M^ ~fl£tr+i 'rX ~sd.,,, ,u>v " ~ r.r:~ . ~ n M ,i; k•^~ >t~'`"~ - _P xu?,~'~ ! , , .7rw - tr ax " . ,a~•' „ ~ . t.E,. r w~ ~ . a,.. ;z~..,. •t. t ;•~,:,;»S•, :r r. N rrt. s t ' r}^:.a3>, a+'Sb?'~~,>, e~»,`x.E' 't ,.a5-„~'aa~`g 3'y _ a,~''•9-=: *<6F'. .,hiV^{.~ U'k a - x ,#t'~ ,g: 4^ axe ;4;. r2. r1 ),}q, -;R r s~ '~.a r try. •'n• ~e -r•?'„ *~%r*s`~-s'. r,~.,H> -S w~ `s+ gg r, a' .,„Jv,.,,,,, at• - a: ~t>^', `+'?'v.~..:.,axRC y... ~°.e 9'r ~'i `Cf , p,~ s r -ks« ~akr 'L^k~ 1 ~ s `4"• , " 7` rs ! k 'k, Y . • r , .'},'ti"' . A.,.. ' .r L 4 Cs ~w~ `ar z+, J rr ~i~ • R ~ .4' j 'C i~~" .~~'t':' S4~~ 3;~ 3"~.•, tw,a`M1a 'xt4~M:,,,.. u~, ~Lr 8' t ,.+'Sq ^<-(o } 3 +~!n> i>~'" : ~~,ny <3~ S r~'t;^ •,¢rr .,A s• ~ w,~.&r~Y ,.;~.x}~N vw`}''.:.~ti-, "•'~~z';"t,~ ~'.,,.,.t.,a~r:,' ;na...,f<;a~'.a R`= >C'-, '4<a,rJ "w`~.~.eer", vs. 6. rv w d ra, ^ a p,•,. a^J R.,,.et .3' t,:„ 'Y R^,;. - ,+S E '~;"a ',xck" i +aa ~ {Ykrv'' I iS 3'+ .C,{,b:<~. i a~•21 , ..wy;,: , tk•' < i s ~ ' d , r I ~ , , d ~ :.:i;..`~_~,a•,a; R^><s~ , x Y, Y MEN v~".`~. .~5„,. .~i "^T. Z'~':^`-'~:~ • r 'w-y^ ,,..T, ~ . {d k': , . =d i „ xx- k,.. ":»F ,4., a"v _ ta,a;.• 4. 7t uq; •.d 3+ .:r' !xY.,• ,Ss, , ,~ttt#':i^ a :4.,.r,,4r. ;rJr+,,;+.;r,,~';ia,°.s•,',;;4'^' A^)'* xvf0,k '3ifhd>~iu eY4lwvwv .Y... 5. .,.f,.1s.§°~. M ~t 7'r - - , '~~.-afL',k YRVir++C t 3 ;1 SS.t S> t r - ? h ±gs'xL Msa~„Yr.ss}~~yF at >s ^r'`F r R {-*R"4-YS t'"r, "s ~ 11111Xtd~!,fi>at"''~..`a "z-z ''a2~ nr ~ k~a s u y, ,>F a tfr,"~~# ? ¢i 3{ ~ t ti £Ft J't ,?-+r.'~'' ; c tF ~ ! ~+.t 15~, 'Y. - i ' M''a'y NK PR?a i ~~)2 y w ! YF{Eki, _a s_ 4t {a; F.t 1Y aM ,1"JV ~ - a ;1 E~,Pr £ry ~5 k s }t ~ aY' r, x; a~'~ r itv t rta ~ F 'n' ap FxR f4 ^^r y} r v r 5 E r t-i F { r ?ril `•s x `a 5 `G t d ! S ~ J~ lkn r a 4 1_e ' `r i t C ` li ' h TWO OUT u t ~ 3 ? - p r ay 9 _ , > r ' 00 O ~ z s ~ F r •r r C y,• ',r b i,rr a 11~•~~p L ~ 4 rf :c 29 OR AMC tt f} 3 ~ rO' ~r5 ,S y ~ 4 d di„ ~ V Ib V Q 1 ~ ?t ry; 1 :I A r'tLr s 'f CS r O f a~rxts - '•rs ~f,, rOl I^ a Q (p MAIN F z~h? ,7 zp y}g r 6 y r .1 ti 5£. E.a S 1, tx MCI},}~ ,s.3 st 93 rTa -{r~' W 00Z V k - `y r ~u'iti fEC Y' A r tg'tl V r f k £ €^i E r x, a y y z + to { P 'Sr s 4 t a, j 0 [p r4a t sumovs 11 c o OTEMW ~J "}t Yr}?qXr rnf~r"'-rw'iP'r r U V „ pr a3 Y}a•- is r," ~'!w"w'"`'>~^7~~,^3,~ ~~°tx'krk h~ ~ ti4- i 1} '`'1 r t r r r 1 ~ E ''m 2+ r a s ~ ~ i`t n t Vill VT ~~~a 9 ~a'~ r~ ~ ~ a~ r ~ x c ~ ~?.,e5..~~.,« ~ aYfi,`? rt-,: > ,i., "'•'S~°rr^.r4. _ :'"Y"^: 'v;i, y>i'z Sw4 "7~' } r~sy, 3~~~`~~•~,x"`"~4 `"FR~f- t ~tr!^n. :;y ,r~~ . , w~i ttr ,aJtd c,4 d. ~,..n v.~F'1~M-., x•v3 ."'.fix`-. law '''In 'ri i .A 'r`t b r„x;, E n•r'ra •x 51 'Ft }th T^ 4•>J:^.Fi J~,., r,;w °1,5e1 a n,i. a "``>ss•. :'r, 21,1 ,~",-~d3•;.• }y ~r~ fie+'~` :d~•^ . w : Fit. . 'r F a"~' ' ~`S t,3c < ii « r»~ r ~Y ,5 ".r'-..i +t 2-. . h . f "x.41 'w`.'42 e.. {'•"m, }i c '.~'"v a ~.uLa tv aF:,'s>F*x u.sr9., „ b•" W- tPx. r, a n.1e 3+nfk, 'RS <,+-T4 M <r`, d. M:"~`, f e„a °ii'.. ~`,q. zf. , t ,ks r k'.: « 'z ' 't. ~ s••z'>: v ` rt r i•*.:.t r• Y°,." t}:r^t.c ~<`~:i - .,`1:. ,°'°S'{k,. ' > ^~•9 y°" r. r~ £ >a.t a £ t ar4, ".9 . .r, r. K, ) . "`,-;.7F.. _ ros _ v* .;,v~S v"<u" 3, tt 41tl„s,q 3='l4- yr tf' « Af isgt u~•.»dp { ^r m . J' e, t$§"+-.. G M~ , .t~,. a .fi'd. r s'.,w, 4 E x t .,c;,.., , R' `=+1 ,.2r u'«i; v ~'rr'7r',}sY ,r r~ e , r'te' ,:•t~= `~3:~:~.~„ .,<a:.. iw;•.~'r:t' F,3':<, `•;w,..,~ 'A§?=,° y r..~,' ~ . ,g,, :l ' ,.7'. ~Y'a" n.~r`:W: ,z ,..'Nit • ' G: wk 1•r t -n rs~ Yv~• , .r""G,. ti ~ r{ Fr ?i',. n~, r~ ,~'r~• tu.-,Y:` :.,c>s, ^'a - .x,-,- r,+r -;'4x.• "~r'h } 34 . xt.. -',"i°,1' _r„ M 9 : r' x',r,. A «•r„m a et' xt, , <t rt, , . "h „d':rr x . Y ~ r.54S? ^hS.., 'i i"~ `S , nz,Ct tN-}•:.,'< d1 ".7~.,r» fi`'•a-a9 r ,v.2f e~z•."L ;E «."i3 tui^'.si rt 3 M ~ F.*a `A1; u'~, ,.':~M'sh4. -s~F' ,u F"..r' r.a7" a.f s+°s w,.,d..,.s;%;TM•a - k,,,, s'.. 'f.;k-,r f".. „2 i. .i r_rii~ 3 r r mt:4 -<r •~,ror"w<c" ~ ~'fi. ~ `S! ~ ~ ' `;i •s~s~'" . s . , a~?.w. . $f`e~! ,s, ¢ ~r t, ' ~,rE SO. 84 mE ee'fr^' ..Fi.,..h, .,.fn, ,3•s'.nat F,.+r"' 4' W~ 4. :~b -~i ~ • ~ ~'~.,.r": r ~ - , 1 r,~., ~k`. v,- '~r~r: <,.,a", . , s ' _ _3a. _ , ^P•-^ <s ,r.• ` " dk 7 » n~S ^a i;. ; ' e. . a, .a'=- t ~•1?:"n'; `'r , , ac ^ .>u .s 'a` . .,.^:4.r, ' w . d 4 3a.r • St,-,.',~u, ia,', ca. ~ ~ ;r..., ~ ^r. .k•ry~+% .4.N<n a ,~'i'&rr;~,y,v„~ 9,. t,a wa,- •,:~>._2t _~a."~iu'`Ef^~.:n>. J#s.e~i, r,~~a u. r ;r; w'y. >-.t 's ,k. .w.a••:1: e:, rX~. R-~~ ka~.,~.,.~,:~,,, ,F;aa ';r., ~^a, •a," »x. st. ~,k, ,i•-.d'~., sa> r ~ y r • , spa- ,.~srr. 4 , ~ 'S?' , ~,,t .fir: ,Ss: t .ca k 3 arm = ~ , .r~,.r.> -rwk<,,, ~ x r"~',~ " ' `r. "^r"! S.r, , x e.:`~« ~ : a~ st . ~ R r. , ' £ ,N?~ 2 , .k,; , t, a, ~'sSr;p :,~t'w`,. , er+ „'Yu • ~ ,W~• x'a~'1'" '.3 <d w k s r*' - rt..~ih7:^" Y~''`,ir r ,rt' : 2, . .v." ~"n `;r ,cr} S;: ..,.a•'c,xkad,,, p . •-~}"r~, :':v . ,4u"!c:"E`as o-~~" ~ 4~'x w 5?^' a: ~ .A£F;x ~''~wZ+w~ , .a'i§• .,a .pt! l.;; aP."• rr".',tE ."^7ti', -I`, 1r'k?'. },x ~z'"T ¢:a.. e'.:.r, .mhess^ .;a;'.;'~'•' ar', $ z n* • '~-e, x, 'a~ '1'f'i"`$. <}""•'9,c,~.r. i t.'r.",' ,w.s- .¢a-«,..~ .XJ~„ 'qL:,, •:;ar.' s4 ,~:,~i°:: ~v. ,s+t .c%. 'i;,.""n~. ,dw .''~k"Mx4'•t' d. ss 2 ~ ,+'4 R ~t¢' .;n'a'-,..., ,iv < ,ems z fr< . J4_ gi-^S ,,,p~'^c~ F , r,N, r r~, ~>~~,'..1 ~ru ti ~x„ ;i c r,° . , r•', ~,xer, ,e,., w. ~LFr:~N~^h tiu,A .p« , ) t , .rt,.ty ,.o-y ~a ~~'r^a.. 'rr„ ° s"+v . ~.t ; ~ .,s ^''?N,k;', rpy,:.P s->^,r. ~3A< ,r,J ?;};.,Y~ na: •er,r x.. r•,. i1 R i^k, M r : ~ :,,R :e~t°m:, "rtr:' ys ,3 ,F_:. ::?C . _ ::.-r<y,,: << + i;f}; mr, ' ~'~i « - >*?:£i' - .m, ~ vP= ~ 7 y 3'- .tx,r..r>~,., ;3r •.r P';rr;: 'w~^#`~s,'" ~a ;~£~:a '~"Sa2.a9, a - Jig . :~,m_, .r. .-r...,w,,..#£:'„:.:a._..tv.w.~.~,.n,~._.._'«, ,.,-.x<"~... r.~_x, ..:ea:r ,,.t^e Yt%, 5.ux1.5`':'.rr....~:+n o.i,~izva n .ar ..-,.t s•.rcir,. ,,..:<~i"` i..s 2'~., t,.kw-,r.. `'`'&a:~,~ir„~ne`.r<.>a.`"a ,n. s:~S~'i~„ti,r,..~~_R~e`~,•:~~3:cR«.,,^~,:~r_=, 5 is ' t ai~a A"5 fi` , - F F it- , .:a a`4' ~s`, =4r?~+.."`;x,~, F ,v - 71.1 + - 3 - r i'~ks +'4. s + f:- 4 J r ty3tv4,i---r- _ a' 4- 11 arx:°.a s' t i _ ~,a, r t;~.y'rd^--, ; " Y M .r A R_,'~7,:` ~!~F pw~ -~'~--l'~~'~,-,.---;,."~ll",~,;",,-,"~,.'~--l"~",~~'--~ - ~ - - 11-1-i I'- I -1 1, 111~_ -1 7k x~ zt a"N t~ , ~~i g _ "Y"- r- - 4:45 p.m. s , i -LLJ 9. CONSIDER WETLAND MITIGATION ON CITY PROPERTY - BOWEN z~ 3 " t ' ",~:;~_;„p = ;.,f DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - - ' gp 4,5 - _11i 4r . 1 ~ n~,~ { _ a. Staff Report: Community Development Department t- OfM, 't -y} b. Council Discussion/Questions -A C. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 96-_ -I. e,N -1 `t - r 10:00 p.m. _ - ygi< . +-;r~^ -s5 'e'"' . ~ 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS ; t 12 j k il~ " 10 11 a^y WA - e}y - - 10:10 D.m.'? 'r"~'s~Ss~` 1v -v Z, I , 1,, 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City council will go into Executive >Kh.~'' ' ,x : Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 i d " r ~ ~ a ~k ; z discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending r ; litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are - s,~ ~ -i . ' ° confidential, therefore nothing from this meeting maY be disclosed bY those - > - w1 t , present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this J ` s session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. a` ~ - ~ ~ :Y+° .r ,r _ _ 10:30D.m. w~ - ~.,F ;~ks.,, ~',,-as : • r•,,,,` w °g 12. ADJOURNMENT x x a`.ti..F~i{s~f.;.e2 _ r ,.q z;,,:,2 ad. fha L c Y - cca960514.doe : -N 4 r ~r. , - 53,5 k 5` 3 * f I fi ~=a . if, - 4, ~ aka' 3' j 5e ! 2 $ SE. - i.. - v4r ~Y'3} C'f cise. 1 i , 4,1 ~'ld ' - f3'+h 'h4 S 'rt vi y e'P . T"~f . ZWE ~ c l,,i a t Ma ~ r w, ae r ' 4 - 'r rte. ! ~ m t Ra ~r3a, COUNCIL AGENDA - May 14 1996 -PAGE 5 x f -r,P,x4 -TnA-M~,hf1 e t3Y n v 1.r MW T - n i 1, - Z%40 11 = x ~ € ~ "t 1n t I 1. rid a z ri rr.I 4 j '~5 x x' yr a <,.y - 4 - 'r X '~F' k x "Kx'r r^ ,.r x - f nz u r F 4*-"r , T F sv Fj S[ 5 yet s * ls. t _ . f - xa fi - i , t e -fits 33 r - - { , - j . ,,-'a ,k , - g- Rk ` t 5-..~u'oa;±s~.s - - .h - 1 r z - I - . 4J, 4~~, wwi:_ 11 -.1 I ,r N , n. a _ - - .1 " _.,._''.:.a.. ;'r .7,... _ -_,~._T:~ ai r 'ir _ t` a3&r` r , ----.-I' " , , ~ . 'I- " '--L~~ 7~- --_7-.'.,2, ~ M u ~2. - ,a. Paz E -~,gfgj'fi n -1 - - - x'".33' ~ mews s1 _ w_,..,a.,..~..---- ,Y....,w,.~.. - 't " ?}v f ~ Z sg s - 3 _ - " 3,1 x Ag®nda item No. t', - ~r 3 t'~ - a'_ _ - ~11198ting of IP'11~~~0 r x ~r of { y TIGARD CITY COUNCIL f s ` l c " f ~ " MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1996 t. %'2 c ' • STUDY SESSION ~h 4 C ` ~ ' ' x'-3 -e - xr > Meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli a 4 > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Brian Moore, Ken Scheckla, and V ! 7 ; .k _ , { Bob Rohlf (arrived at 6:55 p.m.) ku- L 7, try t , a f p 5 > Staff Present: City Administrator Bill Monahan; Planning Manager Dick ` Bewersdorff; Property Manager John Acker; Human Resources Director Sandy T l,er, F ~ Zodrow; Administrative Analyst Loreen Mills; Public Works Director Ed Wegner; - 1 : , , City Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Asst. to the City Administrator Liz Newton; z} - ~ e Finance Director Wayne Lowry; and Legal Counsel Tim Ramis." fi n > Others Present: Richard Ragland, Architect. ~ f > Report on City Hall Roof - - ~ } g r° s City Administrator Bill Monahan introduced Richard Ragland, architect. ; , . ; r g i { 4 Mr. Ragland reviewed the summary of work proposed for the City Hall Roof. He t ~ r ` 3 y, r explained the current situation and the three options given, using a graphic to ' ~ ~ x{ 4 r p , 11 ' illustrate the specifics of each option. He stated that his structural engineer has ' i, - n ,L 2 _ rte" informed him that the roof was built flat and the building designed to carry a second , , - . kl story. - , - ~ ~ 6 t 11 -11- t. 6 Mr. Ragland said that the first option was to cover completely the entire roof system ~ - with a metal roofing system utilizing a low pitch. He reviewed how they would roof I k ~ and ventilate the mechanical well and provide for a fire sprinkling system and r a~ natural lighting in the attic they created. - j `Y F r p "72' f ' x'W' PG' V Mr. Ragland said that the second option was a single ply membrane roofing system Zt . utilizing a low pitch. He distributed samples of the membrane sheet, comparing it -.s , r~ , r to a pool liner. He said that the mechanical well would be roofed in a manner I,I - ~ ' {d , :.e similar to the first option's method; this system also created an attic that needed a t` z" Z a I" fire sprinkling system. wk - G R A In response to questions from Councilor Scheckla on the mechanical well, Mr. Ragland said that they were putting a door in the north wall for access but they were 2 - _ w - E, _ closing off the rest of it to keep it weather tight; if they raised the roof, then they needed to start building walls to keep the water out. He said that there would be 'V -6- I I ' louvers at each end for air circulation. He stated that the building was sized with - , , plenty of capacity to take the weight of the mechanicals on the roof. Councilor " Rohlf pointed out that the mechanicals included the HVAC system for the entire - building which could only be removed by a crane. „ - - c ' a TT T' i Y ` t ( i 1 4#, CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1996 - PAGE 1 ~ A~' g q~} _ fa 1 ! c1 -xr t r r , _ - } as p, x r' _ - - _ -4 a _ a i x y ~ LL - , . I , ; ~ J ~ --~l , 1. - . , . 1- n 4,--,~~V ~ r~ z r w# 73 - -z its a rx d ,fit - J f - 3 kx ,e - - } { r t a i t 2-, a } a - 1, , j t n E I '3 ~'y''4' , by. # 1 - - , - T ~V -4-- M NOW ie. W ~ -'i _ _ - __k$`w11Y. F ! : _i, , I J ~wma+x3+Yi+wa........ ....-_-_~..3.-<u.t.a..~..-.a.r.. :.;k,a:.".u,..wm.«...~~._.,-.+ v,wi.. g - , - J .Y i, -k e r4 _ J 11 . Z, " - 11. J , Councilor Scheckla asked if there were other buildings in the area that used the > r - 1 t, metal roofing system. Mr. Ragland said yes, it was a common roofing system for - industrial buildings. He stated that either of these roofing systems was water tight. v' ~ Mr. Ragland said that the third option was not to provide any positive slope to the t - ' r r r s roofing system but to leave it flat and cover it with a tubber sheet. He stated that this could be warranted by the manufacturer and could save $20,000 over the building tapered system. He noted that with a tapered system they had to fill any x s- x N voids with insulation to meet the code; the sleeper system needed to do that would } - _ cost $20,000. u r ~p j { ~ Mr. Ragland said that Option 1 cost $106,000, Option 2 cost $95,00 , and Option { r _ 3 cost $70,000. A S - _ Mayor Nicoli asked about the warranties on the membrane. Mr. Ragland said that = x - r f they could get either a 10 year or 15 year warranty, depending on how much they were willing to pay for protection, though the cost of the construction process itself s ~s did not change. He presented a schedule of the warranty rates. , ` -e `s ' - In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Ragland reiterated that both 3 *v~ t _r systems were completely leak proof if constructed properly and would be s ' ~ , warranteed. The Council discussed the fastest way to find a roof leak. Mayor Nicoli commented that he thought their current leaks were due to bad flashing. Mr. Ragland said that he thought lock joint was a better method in preventing leaks. 'F{ $1 arm - Councilor Moore pointed out that the bottom line was to prevent leaks. He asked ' what distinguished one plan as better than another for the $36,000 cost differential ~ fty :fr when all claimed that they would prevent leaks. Mr. Ragland said that he recommended Option 2 because he felt more comfortable with a positive slope. He ? Y ~t said that if the Council did decide to put a second story up in the future, then there dF F was no point in spending the high amount but if they wanted a permanent system, , , then the positive slope draining the water away was the better choice. O~ : x a ; Councilor Moore asked what the chances were that they would ever build a second 1~1- , i, F F - story. Mr. Monahan said that they wanted to keep their options open and directed _ 3 Council to a memo written by David Scott. Ed Wegner, Public Works Director, I - x z , " gg i explained that Mr. Scott was concerned about the strength of the building because v F r --j of his observations of subcontractors not building to standard during its construction. 3 ~i ~ r , , He noted that the building probably wouldn't meet the new codes in any case. t , g - ° - 4 Mayor Nicoli noted that the Option 2 roof had a life expectancy of 10-15 years. t - `41 ~ } Mr. Ragland said that the Option 1 roofs life expectancy was 20-25 years. Mayor f t, ' t - f Nicoli commented that the cost per year of life expectancy for each system was -,,r„ t about the same, and that when they did have to replace the roof, they wouldn't have r k' , y to repeat a lot of the work; therefore the price to upgrade the roof would be more 1 - reasonable. f g Mavor Nicoli stated that he was comfortable with Option 2. I a ; p- ; CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 2 7,. x J 5 L ~fi r 11; ' p r-_ it }}}~d_ C - k _ 'rJ Y' / 5 t ,Y Y- ; _ } h" E a ? r L ~A - 7 ( 6 J - - - J $ t r- d j _ _ yt~ S-- .l _ L } a i f L J rJ $ { ` - i C-_ 1 - i J fj r 4.f tJ E r" - 1 - G y ta:4 f LZ~ i t t E 1 f r 5 - a `r" - - - ~ I X , - , : . ~ I ; . I ~ , - , , ~ . - , ~ , , - s _ _ .i " - , ! ~ -,'~'~k--- W ~ .1 : ~2 , 2~ ; . ~ ~ ~ , I ~ F _ t d^il 1 _ . , . , - - - - . . - - . . _ aria v r ?v - f- i7 _ xx - M, s'. ' , i firs _x - - y Fg r„ f"t ` f y ?s s.'~ x -1 _ - - S, L ti z z "'ice. 3 g~ytz " I'll r~z _.x. _c .a__~._.._„_.....,.,.-..,__ ..,z...e...a......_3,~~:.Arai,.;u... .,,.-,..._....w_..,..._....Y_.,._- R 't 'a ri. } . 3 rat;. - • .,`-~u.> .''r- ' _ ~.r., , - ? 'r - + - - Councilor Moore said that he supported Option 2 also, since they have already set C 1, ~f= 1, llvl -1. I. - z the move aside. n money t ~ - r ` . , 11 L o i _ Councilor Rohlf agreed with Option 2 also. - a - k - - k hFi_-Y t - G - : Councilor Scheckla said that he could support either option, as long as they had as {,SL- x - many guarantees on the work as they could get. s *3r~ S Mayor Nicoli asked Mr. Ragland to provide information on the warranties to the r1 z City Attorney. Mr. Wegner said that staff would proceed with plans and specs for K h} . T s__ Option 2. s MI ~W r l~ Mayor Nicoli asked that staff verify that the flashing installed earlier UM year was ~r i in fact working to prevent leakage. ~pr <~?r -,„4 ^ "E q > EX' CUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at s i 7:05 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (3), & (h) to discuss labor . , ~ --f-, " 1,,, .I t relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. tx - 'i > Sprint Proposed Contract Update ' t j' a~,- sY "I 1 ;7 Mr. Monahan explained that he had signed the Sprint contract at a rate of $900 a _ M& ,v ~zYx , r month with five-year terms and an option for the City to terminate the contract after t~ ' 4 I { the second renewal (15 years). He said that Sprint dtnot sign the contract because t; r; - of the following co. The C had n a rovision City : L, - T~ 11 .1111-1-1-1 I'll .1 1 and Tualatin Valle nFire & Res ue TVF&R) ototco-locate on thellole; tthe ewere Ott' Y Y P Y r k ' f r + r told by the negotiator that there was no cost. However Sprint said that there was a» ` cost since they would have to put up a more substantial pole. r ~ 0 a Mr. Monahan said that Sprint said that they would allow the co-location in exchange I , t a r ~ for an agreement not to terminate within in the 25 years. He said that he told them a R ' com romise but that he woul t s not Council. The coamp omise tplteyl suggested was the larger pole and anothec$50 per month in v - ~ ~ ` t 7 ,w`` . , rl; I t t exchange for an agreement not to terminate until after 20 years. ; H k ; a ~ t + ? In response to a concern from Mayor Nicoli, Mr. Monahan said that they had a , x' q 1 1- ' provision stated that as long as the installation did not interfere with SSLP's a, C A V ` operation and use of the site, the City & TVF&R could co-locate on the pole. He 'f £pj 'S s'~ y said that with the 20% automatic escalator clause at the end of five years, the $950 , I €f a month totaled $460,000 over 25 years. He stated that $950 a month was a good t -z ~ T h rate. He pointed out that Sprint was siting the pole in such a way as to leave enough z,- room for someone else to rent property. ' ` r 5 j, {X k ' { s 1 ,z 3 > Discussion on Budget Committee Vacancy Applications 11,1 - d ,r,, r~ Mr. Monahan said that staff needed direction on how the Council wanted to give + ' input on both the Budget Committee and Planning Commission applications. Mayor a _J 64, ~ - Nicoli said that he and Councilor Rohlf would review the applications and bring z d _ , - back a recommendation to Council. , ' ' l r _ ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1996 - PAGE 3 s X, k 3=' ~,t~' t F Zvi Q} - -T _ , ~ P 2 e f y - fF r A - 3~il~-'IYI,1:1? - 1~~11~?6~1' , E " - ~ , . -t ~ - - ~ , I jil:,--,~ - , , ~ 1~1'.~-~"-,---"-, ~Ir ,~i' ,:,;i,~,-'. ~ , , , i z x. t { fi s ` nf4r ifid - z > 7 4 . pill 27,-~7.._ __.7.._ ,.-ulcer wt - _ .Y. 1,..:.': X' t e.-f, ^ae^4"'t° .F tv'~. Y^• _ ~~uA'+r.;'R m zs~+ ,i4'J, » -Yr,.2 r~Ia4li._, 4.{ ~ < -......,,sue - - - `Y y L x Y ~~>nr ~s~-~~ ~ { , .t t, - _.,....,..~._....._.J.__~._w..._..__....e.._.....wras°,..~+1 ...._..J......~_ ~._,a...._...,_.._~...-..,...°_ $t ~•i'-~' ~~i a "Wo 3 ~f Rg- ~e :z k A > Election Information Training s t, This item was deferred till a later meeting.' " :--s > Discussion on Ballot Measure 31 - Mayor Nicoli explained that Ballot Measure 31 was intended to amend the Oregon s k - j kn_ Constitution to bring it more in line with the US Constitution and other states - a g $ constitutions with regard to child pornography laws. He said that the legal people - " felt that this was the best chance to attack pornography operations, given how many, cases have been kicked out of court. Mavor Nicoli said that the group supporting the measure have asked the mayors in _w i the region to endorse it. He stated that he would personally endorse the measure= -701171 ° and asked the Council if they wished to endorse it as a body. He pointed out that _ w r , t.K x if they did endorse it, they could not use the staff to support it in any ways , AN. ~_4.0 7v 7 Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel, stated that the fundamental legal problem for City c~ Attorneys in Oregon was the slightly different language in the Oregon Constitution , r 3 LM r ? from the US Constitution which the courts have consistently interpreted to provide ' - • a higher level of protection of First Amendment rights than the US Constitution. t 3 2 f { ry-P aC" y lx1 - , - The Council agreed by consensus to endorse Ballot Measure 31. 1. BUSINESS MEETING w 4~ ` y 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board Mayor Nicoli called the regular meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. L~ 1.2 Roll Call Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Brian Moore, Ken Scheckla, and Bob Rohlf.k µ f E - 4 L-.~^ uvw • ° Staff present: City Administrator Bill Monahan; Planning Manager Dick_2 c" ' 3 Bewersdorff; Acker; Human Resources Director Sandy Zodrow; Analyst Loreen ti + Mills; Public Works Director Ed Wegner; City Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Asst. "+1~ c to the City Administrator Liz Newton; Wayne Lowry, Finance Director; and Legal` 1 v'W f _ Counsel Tim Ramis. t t' I 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance ,yams; t 1.4. Council Communications/Liaison Reports: None t `h r ny ` l 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items ' City Administrator Monahan added the proclamation designating May 19-25, 1996 as Emergency Medical Services Week. ' q Mayor Nicoli added a discussion of architectural services for the proposed addition to City Hall. '1 TY L CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1996 - PAGE 4_ i W'f FFF X _T" Y a q E s kJ r'Y's s i t y,'~y-k q r - tJ E 7 N'I n'"rz - - a f.ti-n ffu 3 t Y ri 5 fi a r 5 444 1Y6 ? ~ - 3 ~~F Nam x yr -;rtk - v--rm ~dy ~si s`par` 'j, ` - - -s - - a ~ ` w' - t - is ~ ~rres~''S "s' t~, gk'v '`T' r r,-j -.c!5 r £6_ ,x 'r a' de s r 4a+ . U, ' .a t , ; as - s r y'- W - r f I _~.a kr§, r... s, s a 4' t, Councilor Scheckla asked for an update on the Tigard Feed & Seed building. Mr. P _ - r~ , f r Monahan said that next week the Chamber was scheduled to report on the status of a ~,r t'~' h . x _ the building. He said that staff was still awaiting the land deeds from Burlington k r-, :„1 r ; Northern; they have eliminated their Property Management Division and were now 1 , , _ contracting with a private management company. He said that due to = - A 4, t property V a t : a - confusion with the transfer, new deeds were needed and that the situation would be 3: _g4 r xp,F„x _ resolved. i. ,N r dZ h 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA - r~ r -f =a2 k Steve Shupe, Metro West Ambulance, expressed their appreciation for the City's ,s•, " x'%-11 11. i; willingness to designate May 19-25 as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week. He M. ,c ^!,::n t:~ Lhe`r "de the EXRe `r, ~ i ; .j _ -a f; expressed p., in system : n Washington n~uaiy and saluted a"tl their ~n . partners, including the 911 system and medical and fire department personnel. He A : ~ acknowledged their partnership with TVF&R. He invited the Council to participate in their F M ; VIP ride along program and to attend a family barbecue on Monday, May 20. f i r Mr. Shupe presented Mayor Nicoli with a placque commemorating their EMS partnership. , s _ g Mayor Nicoli signed the proclamation. `r 5 - ,l 3. CONSENT AGENDA ,fq-1 --4 . P Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Scheckla, to adopt the consent agenda. - ; ? z _ffi 11 ~.M ~ , 11 > r' , * The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, 2 Councilors Moore, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes".) 1 , 5 r , ~fi _ 3* 3.1 Approve City Council Minutes: April 9, 16, and 23, 1996 ha r 3.2 Receive and File: , . a. Council Calendar C ' b. Tentative Agenda A{ Y M L fi 3.3 Appoint M. JoAnn Hayes as Deputy City Recorder -Res. No. 96-29 +,Y x 3.4 Adopt Fee Schedule for Land Use Application - Res. No. 96-30 1 1i x s 3.5 Approve Purchase of Ross Street Right of Way- dt~`i s f - S of 4, F iI $nt s,+ z : - • Consent Agenda -Items Removed for Separate Discussion -None t ? ` ~ 4. REPO TY ON OREGON FLOOD SUPPORT SERVICES OF WASHINGTON 3 c - If ' 11 ' c ri - t".,--A*"~ s Ron Carl, OFSS Washington County Coordinator, reported that well over 60 families t ,u - - - - C ? and businesses in Tigard have applied for federal flood relief from FEMA with many more 4 ,i 0 k afflicted. He said that they primarily provided disaster counseling, dealing with post= - ; g' traumatic stress in families and individuals. He said that their service utilized professional ~ f : i t'~ licensed counselors and was free of charge. °n5. k MF 11 = f' CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 5 r o ' e , , ,~9 r"`s t 2Sgs'9ar '~,aE y c y: % ,per„ rn...-••..~ ~•„w,m..rzr-rees•vd~" ,.,,e.....,7 r~ a'^t s L" yt F ,1. 11'11-t~11- U M y r n °k s t r - r3 s t~ t 9- F -'1 y h _ tf p' -q5, 3 --q c r - _ I d 3t5. - 4,-2q _p _ 'day r`~~T'$°Fb r s i ~r v i - - : x ,r - y.6.~y 9 rt, ,~x. § > -.p s "4 - v' - - - r _-'km kr,...t "-r3,r, 3 i yin, ,V rs y t r _ 7, „r y T , , ~ ~ ~ ~ - -1 - ~ 7 ~ , ~ 4 ~ - - . , ~ - ,1 , ~ M -X 1_ _r.}x r.ali - yRfi~n,a Yk _ 3+J+. "Ti..y...~ wy. r..- N ~~y _.a w. ! _ a - tS-i Yk '1_1 El 11-7 _ &F - - - €k 4 ~ _ ~ tz i 1 _ _r _ _ _ Y® `~5 t f`' r 't - - z _7 , 1 r t z Mayor Nicoli asked if the organization was private non-profit or an arm of a county agency. r Mr. Carl said that their funding trickled down from FEMA through the state and the county with additional funding from St. Vincent's Hospital. He said that the counseling would be , 's, u available for the next 10 months; after that counseling would be available through the 1 d- County Crisis Services. _ f - 5. DISCUSSION OF VISIONING PROJECT 1, I~ Loreen Mills, Administrative Analyst, reviewed the revised schedule prepared by staff (see s, Council Packet), noting that the process was split into six phases. She said that the first t x . r~ phase (Summer '96) was the announcement phase in which they informed the community A„ of what they were doing and garnered broad base community wide ;nvntyrmPnr. She said r that iiic second phase was split between conducting the community survey from mid-October , - g ` ! to mid-November and presenting the results in town hall meetings and at service clubs, etc. 4 ? - L r x4r b w in January and February. She stated that they were deliberately avoiding the holiday period. ~ ? 4 r Ms. Mills said that the third phase began with the selection of 30 citizens to serve on the - 4> r , vi Steering Committee to work with staff to identify the areas of interest that came out of the ' - 3 survey and citizen meetings (March -May '97). Next the Steering Committee would split i,' _f,, ','f, gr,,~Yq, I :1 up into smaller groups to work with City staff to develop strategies to address the identified issues. In the next phase (August - October '97) staff would develop measurements to show r t - `P the citizenry that the City was implementing the strategies identified during the visioning , _ `N#- } ' - V+ process. fi 0_- F, r a, _ L_- Y^ Ms. Mills said that in January 1998 they would present the first annual report to the ~ ~ x r"y citizenry to tell them what the City has actually accomplished in addressing the identified , ! 4 - citizen concerns. She said that they proposed an annual report as the follow up process with `1 t ! r _ Y periodic testing of the survey results to make sure that they were still current ' ~~,r = Liz Newton, Assistant to the City Administrator, reviewed the revised budget. She stated - k - that she contacted PSU and Lewis & Clark regarding the possibility of using interns to do ~ ~ ~ , r the work; the professors felt confident that they could find interns interested in the project, _ , ' - probably second year graduate students. Ms. Newton reported that she also contacted the Tigard public schools because staff wanted x ` ; ~ r `g , z~i to include them in the process. All the schools were interested so now staff would target ~ - . ~ - ~ IK a couple of schools to participate. She said that she would also contact the private schools I _ gv, } ' I 1-T. and those who lived in Tigard but attended Beaverton schools to see if they were interested i , -k 3 , t in participating. _ r F F f_!`A"fi j Ms. Newton said that they were looking at getting businesses to sponsor the "End of Phase" celebrations. Taking a closer look at advertising costs and consultant costs also helped to k reduce the budget. She pointed out that the budget did rely on interns doing the work but _y ~:l" reiterated that the professors had been very confident that they could get them. She noted r rf ~ _ - the sections that gave greater detail on what she, Mr. Monahan and Ms. Mills would be ' J doing in the process, and that listed how much and at which phase they would be spending funds for consultants. Ms. Newton reviewed the visioning process for the TV audience. She said that it was a 16- i ~k~~ r^v month process to involve the citizens of Tigard in helping staff identify a direction for the I r 4 , - u` a _ s CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 6 f 1 x ' a r 1 . 7 l - - _ p., t _ t r ,bt - - 'a ~Y} c i ! y4 i ! - - - t k F . f - - - . , -1 4- - - - ~ 12 I I - I I , - - I I I I " - - - 'L ; ~ : .1~ 1. ~ - , ~ 1~ , . " - i ~ I - , - ~ I ~ L' I I ~ - I ~ : , . : , - I - . ~ , ~ - - "I I ~ : i I - - ~ - , T - -1, - , - - - ~ ~"1 1 ~ , 57~:.. - il(--.._vr r.r A~-i,l:-,i~` :.f±'¢.;p. 7c z CIF w.+i.-,,.. 4trt;,-:-_t i r t-S -_k aT S - - v ._....__a..__.,.....v...s.... -1, ,ytx ti....c .n ! r - - _ ~ t§ v 1-1 I all . & j community, She emphasized the importance of citizen involvement up front, pointing out 5 ) the community survey and the citizen Steering Committee. She cited the successful . x experiences of Scottsdale, Arizona, and Milwaukie, Oregon, in acquiring money from grant g, . , or other sources as a direct result of this process. ~ a 4 r,, c" Ms. Newton said that she has also contacted Metro about getting money for the Visioning ,•+h r, process. She said that she has been encouraged to pursue funding because their process R,: { t could serve as a model for how other citizens might want to integrate the 2040 issues into } - 1.~5 t a city's future planning. u: ~ ~ 1- t Ms. Mills commented that they have heard from the other cities involved in this process that , _r, 11 - - their 1GIAt hips with -6- e....... ;t;. . ; in thr city fi P fire district, etc_) have improved s I, ' th b 1 ViLiala(ao vraua t},9 A,0 - s, 3 t } because they were all working from the same game plan and could make mutually P t yin } 1. -1 41 supportive decisions. ` , I , Mayor Nicoll asked if the proposed budget was included in next year's budget. Ms. Mills t #4 said that it was but explained that the presentation at the Budget Committee meeting had ° f , ~ E t - a :lwy t ` : been based on the first budget. She said that if Council approved this, the revised budget a would be discussed at the June budget review. $ f - _A- Ms. Newton noted that Councilor Hunt has not yet seen the revisions since he was out of vc town. W ~ Mr. Monahan stated that staff could bring this back on the May 28th agenda for Council a x action. He said that staff hoped for unanimous approval because of the considerable effort j ~ Z, W7 - ' and commitment on the part of staff and the Council to make it work. I i J Y Mayor Nicoll stated that he supported the process. s x Councilor Scheckla expressed his reservations regarding the process. He stated that he did ( wry,' --5 . -1i I not think he could support it. He said that he thought that they had enough volunteer people L ~ ~ 3 telling the City where to go in the future without adding another survey, and that he ;r~_ F 'Ll disagreed with Ms. Newton and Mr. Monahan taking time away from their job duties to do this. , wl~ , . Councilor Rohlf stated that he strongly supported the process. He said that he didn't know ~ _ - , - - ; v" fi 4 how anyone achieved goals without laying them out and working in a proper direction. { } : " Councilor Moore stated that he agreed with Councilor Rohlf. He said that this was a good y 3 s, 1'- jk~ ,t g .i time to be proactive and develop a road reap to give them direction before events overtook f~ - ~ -1 - i them. , .-tom . < tt c Councilor Rohlf said that he would be willing to wait to vote on this matter until Councilor r}~ € Hunt returned. ~5 i fi > 6. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI JUDICIAL) ALBERTSONS' INC./DUNCOMBE Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) Remand - Comprehensive Plan .'t Amendment (CPA) 93 0009/Zone Change (ZON) 93-0003; Site Development Review (SDR) 93-0014/Minor Land Partition (MLP) 93-0013 r ~t ' k - a. Continue Public Hearing k fi ix 11 7 ' , im- v - r CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 7 x m ` e 2L -s tr - r- ' R5z - ff 1 i 11V - ' r. ri~ ro. r ] v _ - . - •a try a~ t` f i - L d - S V' - &4't~ $ 43 - L 1, - , . ~ . ~11 ~ I ~ " " - .1 , , _ ~ ^T ,,4"~ _ ~ . - ~ I , - - - , - . 11 r . .1 1, ; 41+'- "I'. A - , fl 4 A! t - f e C i 4V X # { 3 p f f t x; 1 x ~a ~h L t 1 - ti l - - ; - - 11 - - i '..nLa' 4. - - k lT" tg Y r rt . - " • Al~ 11 FS 1 - { b 'Y ~ l_ ~r+ $ ,I 1? n..iaaa.~i'i.+X.~Sx3k..mw4wma. ..a.. ..I _~._..._...e.w.Y. K._.w,....o._ - ry, s 14'v ` - £ - axe` ,rk P ~S i m. K_ - : 1' t11 Ft - g r z ' % 4 Mayor Nicoli asked for clarification on whether or not the hearing had been closed, ~ T -a allowing only the applicant to provide rebuttal of written information. - _ ~ , " Mr. Monahan introduced Terry Mahr, the City Attorney for the City of Newberg, r r ~ w who was filling in for their City Attorney because of a potential conflict of interest. ` r _ t t ~ Mr. Mahr confirmed that the hearing was in fact closed at the last meeting; the 7 , - _ applicant was allowed seven days to submit his rebuttal statement and tiio record x, - , was now closed. He noted a request from Mr. Kleinman (opponents' representative) { ~ - . r ~,,i - _ ~ to give a four- to five-minute rebuttal; Mr. Shonkwiler objected to reopening the _ a record to allow that. A, Mr. Mahr advised the Council that they did have the discretion to reopen the record r ' ~ " , but noted that they would have to allow the applicant another seven days to submit 3 Y Yt x ? rebuttal unless he waived that right. He said that the Council could make a decision - ; tonight since the record was closed. He stated that both Mr. Kleinman and Mr. ? Shonkwiler wanted to make additional arguments, should the Council reopen the c r r , record. _ r + tl , ,t lz~ x Councilor Scheckla asked if a decision to allow additional testimony could be s ` y $ appealed. Mr. Mahr stated that any decision made by the Council could be appealed + t to LUBA, then to the Court of Appeals and the Oregon Supreme Court. x the Q1": s4 Moore ilandR Nto reo Counc Mohlf ayor co~iaconcurrednoCounc for Scheckla stated tha ahe couldtgo ~ " 1 t } either way. * ' x L.IN b. Mayor Nicoli stated that they would not reopen the record. The public hearing was closed. j T Wr - u* s ' C. Council Consideration - Ordinance No. 96-20 t - ~ 7J , . 11 ~ Councilor Rohlf stated that he was comfortable with the findings except for the i . ~ k ° 11 language on page 8, TCP 8.1.3 (h). He said that he thought they had changed the - ~ ' language to state that this policy did not apply in this situation because the property 11 , 7_11. I y, k was not near a bike path. + r € Councilor Rohlf asked staff whether or not the language in 8.4.1 was typical of the P ` , zt 3 a language commonly used in findings . Mr. Bewersdorff stated that it was lengthy but served the purpose and did not overstate the case. ` 8 Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Ordinance t t} O, 1, r.1 96-20 as amended by Councilor Rohlf. & i '~r.""~T i i 5 '1,~', ~ 4 17, _ 4 The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. + ,y ` _ tt + 4 Ordinance No. 96-20, an ordinance adopting findings and conclusions to approve as comprehensive plan map amendment and zoning map amendment requested by x Albertson's Inc., CPA 93-09 and ZON 93-03. s T i x - t.~,a - - f N i£- X~ I T' i-,hy~a j ? ...n/ 6 l~TTV ~l1T TAT/'~TT T.T.TiAT-IT, - - - ~.aa a -11- ivaa:i,aaavv 1'vi11YU T1rJ - MAY 14, 1996 - PAGE 2f s---f' 3 x K a , m M 4 { 9 - .G - .-.z...p,,,p, § t s C 3 1', - c I_ _ _~~U.,~,j _ " r,~ , : ,N ; _ ~ ~ ; I : , 1. ~ I ! 'I.- " " ~ 11 , , , ~ ~ A , "~`ex,, s `Y` y 5, "x - f ny _ , f {Y g C- a * r s s , I a r' B:'~E,.~.- - ~ ~ , , W, I . - t. x.,. s i_k,O-V,~ - - ~ - , , , ~ - , r I I : ~ , - - : - i F c s S .sue. L- - _~.r - - L &4,- - - a- - e ' ;x. r - W N s' i _ 1 1 1{ k - i 4 4x3 -Z ~5 . Councilor Rohlf expressed his distress that this application has taken so long to go through the process. Councilor Moore concurred. - , r Y ~ s Motion was approved b unanimous roll call vote of Council Present. (Mayor . i y Nicoll, Councilors Rohlf, Scheckla, and Moore voted "yes. an' v: .i"_ - - { `S'am..-.r,i t= r ~iSY is 7. I U.-i- iirARING (LEGISLATtI' E) - ZONE E ' ORDR ANC;E AMENDMENT (ZOA) ~ ` 96-0003 - DEDICATION, RESERVATION AND IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS }.y° ` y' - The City of Tigard proposes amendments to the Community Development Code Sections i r t 18.32.050 B.5, 18.32.250 E.2, 18.96.010 A. and 18.96.100 A. and B. to require impact = 4..;_.- _ ..4 yr. i ~s study, reservation and dedication requirements for public facilities and services. w", r LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: N/A. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide ' s Planning Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a., 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 'I , 3, 7 and 8; Community Development Code Chapter 18.30. ~'r 3L 1 ; ti a. Open Public Hearing M 4 f e£ I Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the hearing. ? r' r - b. Declarations or Challenges: None a } fi ' w, , C. Staff Report= t - ry L r iY, r x ~ x, Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager, presented the staff report. He said that this ' r ~ ordinance was before the Council as a result of the Supreme Court decision on - - 1,1N Dolan v. Tigard. He explained that these amendments drafted by the City , x11 - 6 r Attorney's office required an impact study to quantify the effect of each development `4 ry' a on public facilities and services. In the case where dedication was required, the applicant would be required to comply with the requirements or to provide evidence ~ $ to support the conclusion that the requirements were not roughly proportional. iV ,1 > r Mr. Bewersdorff stated that the amendment language also included language to "I v , permit the reservation of park land, utility, greenway, and storm drain management areas with setbacks from the reservation area rather than from the property line. He _ - - ~ explained that this would protect the City's ability to construct trails and to manage - z , 71 I drains. r " '~k Mr. Bewersdorff noted the public hearing before the Planning Commission on April • s~ , 8 at which the Commission voted 4-3 to recommend that the Council adopt the ~ ,'F,r - .11 portions of the amendments requiring the impact study and the findings on rough J proportionality. He informed the Council that the majority of the Commission were - , f philosophically opposed to the new language under 18.96.010 and 18.96.100 regarding the reservation of land for future acquisitions; the other three members felt f a r exactly the opposite. i - _ d d. Public Testimony y # x - Proponents: None s ,P } s 1, i 11 fit{, f x~t Opponents: r t ✓ t } ..d - c1 f..~ w CITY COUNCIL MEETING MIN UT 1 5 - MAY 14, 11,95 -PAGE 9 f,t 'k ~I f,! 6--- ; a { 5 - - I"' P L / ✓ 4 t _ _ S. .{Y_4 - - 11" {p r' ~ ,~5-~V*~,' , , ~ ~ - I ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ " , ! ~ - f : . I , - - = _ J M Z L a F f S i - - J F` I K - S , - t 1 -v It a x } - 1i I& I.I.,~1",_,", - - ~ - ~ - I , . ,1 ~ . , : , , , i ~ - , 5 - 1 may,; I, , - -T'. 11 e Ts r - r 4 - - 5 - - - - ~ f C+ 2Z 2 l l x $ 4 ? 2 rt x Carl Johnson, 8965 SW Burnham Street, stated that he thought the language in the x r fi ; , amendments to permit reservation of land to protect the ability to construct trails was l ` ° f ` Ni unnecessary. He pointed out that the Tualatin flood occurred after Fanno Creek t > . l", f _ " subsided. He suggested that some of the money property own- f°- - "*SS ;M,~ • waicr t -rt' --5', treatment should be devoted to cleaning out the channel of Fanno Creek. He spoke , ' ,~i , 14 for a bike path along the creek rather than meandering through private property, " - fl y` keeping trails as far away from business and residential areas as possible. ;4 , ~ .4;N - ' Mr. Johnson stated that he understood from recent cases that the Supreme Court has g ~r t taken a new direction and emphasized private property rights as equal to civil rights. E Y - He cited the Nolan V. California Coastal Commission case and the Lucas case in , ~ ~ Florida. He stated that people had the right to use their property in accordance with , , ~ Z P, the law. He said that he thought that there was strong legal ground for turning down n r `7 } 4 the language in 18.96.010 and 18.96.100. ' 'g Councilor Rohlf asked if Mr. Johnson saw a distinction between this kind of ~ )mm- ~ condition applied to a developer as opposed to a landowner. Mr. Johnson said no, i s } 's a i that the burden should be on the general public for the general good. = t`~ y r x 1, a E 11 - > Mayor Nicoli recessed the meeting at 8:35 p,m for a ten minute break. ¢ $ ~ ` -l - i ,i 4 > Mayor Nicoli reconvened the meeting at 8:47 p.m. ~Y,~, < E _ , - - 0.l-~f l V S+' iY. .11 - d Y r e. Staff Recommendation i ~ , ~ Mr. Bewersdorff recommended that the Council adopt the draft as prepared by the , z k1 City Attorney. He said that the Planning Commission had a concern that if this was ,t not handled properly, there would be some effect on private property owners over ry ~ • i- - } , the reservations. He said that if they were not careful the provision could be abused 11"', , ' -1- } but that he didn't see the City doing that. ~ ~ F~, ~V,~,- s # w 4----a''' r' 1, -.111 Mr. Ramis stated that the language as it was written was a reminder to decision .1a -4! - r :r,, makers that the way to avoid a taking was to address their purposes and goals f 1 f-'`~~ , ~ N. through setbacks rather than through taking land through dedication. He said that k" this invited a less aggressive approach than some used currently. ~x - Mr. Ramis said that he thought it was legitimate to raise the possibility of abuse of i - - i setbacks or reservation; that was why they had an administrative appeal process. He N ~ 3 , stated that ultimately the Council was the watchdog to prevent abuse." ue , Xj f. Council Questions Y - u5 k F YTl~ tXT" 1 i + ays~' b ,f'y, Z 2 Councilor Scheckla asked if adopting this would reflect back on any cases pending >'y now. Mr. Ramis said no, that it was forward looking rather than backward looking. ~t, ~ ~ Councilor Scheckla asked if each situation would be looked at on i 4 is own merits. Mr. Ramis said yes, that they would apply the same law but that the facts would " change for each situation, and staff would have to address those facts. - 4 ✓ } ~ T4 1, _ _ ( f .,.y"°`°"F "'i,.-"c^'d' ','Ilr. ,t CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1996 - PAGE 10 - z 4 v L_,~ _ :J f i f n SSA r - - r , ar_ 3 y 1 j d 'lf s S - R C - i . !t { 5 - ~j 7 7 - E I . . . ...,17 .....4.r. s••_t"'r;,5~?',:e!r;es«rH.. '~.r i nsr C` ~4 M - a s j S L r {L-- - '.ar.•.~ - mow-.. - - - t , - - 8 x § f y 1 4' Mr. Bewersdorff said that this would give staff a better handle on developing findings. He said that this would also enable them to find out early in the. process - 4 if There were any disagreement on rough proportionality if staff suggested dedication. ~ - f { Mayor Nicoli stated that he was uncomfortable with the wording. He cited Section s y 18.31.050, commenting that he was bothered by the phrase code requires y: a r~, dedication of property interests." He said that he didn't think that the Code should require dedication, that doing so was a violation of the Constitution. He stated that r _ - this language in the Comprehensive Plan had bothered him during the Dolan case r r also. He said that he felt more comfortable if the City told a developer that the City _ ti , I , thought dedication of land was the best solution to the problem the developer was creating through his development, not that the City required dedication. # . ' s k Mayor Nicoli raised the issue of the 100-year flood plain and reservation of areas (18.96.100). He pointed out that the Dolan case was unique in that there were no ; --~zk , wetlands immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek at that location (99% of Fanno Creek in Tigard did have wetlands). Therefore the property at the top of the bank on - which the City wanted to put a pathway was useable commercial property. , tt t, Mayor Nicoli said that he was nervous with the concept, stating that he thought that . the intent was to keep the path adjacent to the creek, not to keep it out of the ~1 wetlands. He said that he thought that a lot of the current pathway was in wetlands y or unbuildable flood plain and that the City did not need to take good land except , M , a 2t in isolated cases like Dolan where they didn't have wetland or floodplain. He said , _ that he wanted to read the report again and think about it some more. + r r Mr. Ramis commented that he has not read in the current plans anything to the effect a '-j that they had to locate the path in wetlands or flood plain area. He said that he * a ~ , thought it authorized the City to meander the trail and put it in different places. He ~ - ~ ; said that Council might want to revisit that policy in the future but that this language r J_ ~ - j was not intended to change the underlying plans. ~ , i ` Mayor Nicoli asked if the wording in the current Comprehensive Plan stating that " _ ' z~ 1- F * ~ 5 the City required dedication would be removed as a result of this ordinance. Mr. { F~ Bewersdorff said no but that staff did not apply that provision because of the Dolan ` i" - case. Mr. Ramis commented that was a good point and that an ordinance making r - the Code mean what the City said could be looked at as a companion to this j ordinance. , *A . i Mayor Nicoli said that the portions dealing with utilities, etc., didn't bother him, only those dealing with the pathway. He noted that while the business in the Dolan j F case generated foot traffic in a commercial area, the area Fanno Creek flowed £T¢ through from Hall Blvd to Durham Street was all light industrial; he did not think l that they could apply a decision made for Main Street to that area along Fanno t y r ' Creek because the circumstances were different, especially where Fanno Creek r = ^ r R E flowed at the rear of a property. 1 I x Mr. Ramis stated that the correct process by the City should be to evaluate each I application on its own merits to see if there were the kind of impacts requiring improvements to the transportation system, and then to see if dedication would C-J I _ Cil z COUNCIL N1EE'1'INCU 1v11NU1'ES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 11 -,--z 117777777~177- 1 L 1 - 1 ~'~~t~"-,.-,, t~ , - - - , - .'~4 r f fi F - S L 1 - _ - s k 1 v. ' ~ e y r r V y ` f - _ - _ , 1 kkEEr.. J , E 1- ~ . 1-7 ~ , ~ I , - .1. I , ~ ~ , I ~ . ~ . i - - ~ . I I - ~ 11 , - " A 1- 't I - . - I '-p i~ I -1 - ~ I I ~ I . I I . ~ ~ " ~ ~ I I 1, ~ ~ ~ 11~ ~ I '-w- , . a I sv - __t.lls~.t L-}} y \ 77 1'" JF-f"y+ c~ Fit ,Ir S7atl, - F+W-=- AX4k. '!l ',~v 7 -7 A ey',T i I-, 4'U YS.y-r -nom", nY~~Pr.'Y bi 5..:_:. ~..s:._5;-._....- _3.+u.11 s_» - e_-ri,.- '~;.'R.. ...1- ii - - - G i Uin Y,, N OtF y xf t - - : - - , - - J V,t - - # - - - d" t< - S - - - - - - - T - P - - , I , a Av%Z ~t a= { f - - 4T- ' - 4 mitigate those impacts. He said that it was possible that a light industry would not , F 3 have enough employees per a r., ..a., u..-- ` to r an real impact. He card that they needed to take a look at the Code to make sure it told them to make acase-by-case determination rather than automatically requiring dedication. t h 3 Mayor Nicoll declared a conflict of interest. He said that he had a client who had ' an application currently before the Planning Commission. However since his client - has already agreed to give the property to the City, the conflict was resolved and he would vote on this issue. ;y ' t µ t` " tt Councilor Rohlf asked what the effect would be on the ordinance if they removed f _ ~ ` v the new language in Sections 18.96.010 and 18.96.100. Mr. Ramis reviewed the s? . language in each section, explaining what the effect of removing the new language would be. He said that removing the first sentence under 100 (a) would mean that f measurements of setbacks could include the 100- year flood lain; this was a Tannin `art. ,T- issue, not a legal issue. He recommended retaining the second sentence because * - suggested an important option short of dedication - the reservation of land free of r }`7_ structures with the only exception being the sensitive land process. He said that `'r, > k `,1 ~ h x taking that out would leave a certain level of ambiguity in the Code about the a - a restrictions. ?i , ' Mayor Nicoll asked for clarification on the legal differences between reservation, a _ easement and dedication. Mr. Ramis explained that the most legally defensible :s 3~ ~_J x a position was the reservation because it used setbacks and the courts have historically'* always recognized cities' ability to determine setbacks (which were not considered to be takings). Therefore it was the least intrusive mechanism to leave property i f= f4~ r , - open; dedication was the most intrusive. He said that reservation was not an , . 3 { easement and did not give the City any easement rights to cross over the land; the "'.,,w " owner could make any use of it he chose, short of building a structure (unless he x_~ V went through the sensitive land process). , $ ' ? ' ~ , ~ ~ In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Ramis stated that they s £ ;,Tt4 viewed the language as trying to make the City's authority clear and to the staff ~Vt%"k some direction. g M r ' ~ w~ a f k~' f ' Mayor Nicoli commented that Council needed to decide whether or not to allow staff k r 5 to reserve areas outside of the 100-year flood plain. He asked if the language a ~ , . k restricted reservation of land only to within the 100 Year flood plain. . k r--- 1 t~f jet-" Mr. Ramis said that section (a) dealt only with the 100-year flood plain. He i„, explained that (b) included a second category that dealt with infrastructure and gave [ > _ , separate authority to allow reservation. He said that language covered the case 1 , where the City allowed a person to use the balance of his property to avoid a taking i ~ but was contemplating a utility improvement and needed to adjust the location of the ~ buildings to reserve the opportunity to come in later and buy the easement if needed. " f _ 1 f _ Mr. Bewersdorff noted that they could put a pathway in a flood plain but not in e, 3 wetlands. He said that USA requirements precluded putting those kinds of improvements in wetlands. The City would need to have land outside a wetlands to put a pathway in. . F 1 1, r rTTV !'QTTN(`ii MR~TIPI r: i:iii~I i~TT~O 1rlAll a_. _ i -'~T^^` - ta..J - 111!11 lY, 1976 - PAGE 1L - Ts' "'+"T ' ,j, f 7 ✓ 4 1,`,~~ ,ff~t ' " ~ i ,,'i,,;~, - , - C f P -,-a' _ 11-111- f h` - S F f P- - - - - - - a ¢r1. - _ Lr il I 11 " `,~*',,'it~~,,,', A , . , , - , - 11 , , , ~ ~ I ~ - ~ , . . . 4 ~ , , , - , ` - ~ . ~ _f I i , I ~ I , ~ J _L ~ 6F "~:7 " L . _ ' - ' , , ~ , , , , - I : ~ ~ . , ~ - ~ ~ ~ , I I 11 T , . I ~ _ - r h NC erg F R - ist t. V - .w u, f q1" I 1. - ryd Y - _ - - i - T ! - : -F` g' a, r - 9 - ( 3 6 .f Y .V _ S 7 - - - - - 2~ _ R t h t t x~1 - 1 € t - f µ--t, - 3 _ - f - - aT\ x f Kq - ; ? _ Y S 2-- z f 'SE t j Mayor Nicoli commented that there were areas in the city where wetlands and flood ° 6 plain might run 200 feet wide along Fanno Creek. He raised the issue of fill in a ,-'fir flood plain. Mr. Bewersdorff said that according to their Code, they could only fill - a in floodplain in industrial areas. $ F 0 Mayor Nicoli questioned whether or not iuey wanted to reserve that much of " - r somebody's land. He suggested a restriction to the first 100 feet. Mr. Ramis stated % ~ ' - z that the process for resolving those issues was the sensitive land permit process. ;:Y - z -x x- Councilor Rohlf said that he read this as putting the landowners at the mercy of f ` whatever the City might or might not decide to do in the future. He spoke for ' _ r l t stronger orientation to property rights and for the City buying property that it might $ - - - want to use and selling it back later if they didn't use it. a~- a ,V F f t, r,- .j Mr. Ramis said that was a policy choice for the Council. He explained that staff , ~ r r } drafted language to allow them to go as far as the Constitution allowed them to goz ~"r *ry in protecting the interests of the City and reserving its opportunity to purchase land 5y.", i in the future. He stated that the Council could decide on a less aggressive policy. i , ~`v, - Y Councilor Rohlf reiterated his concern about tieing up the use of someone's property _ ` i ` x w,~ r ~ , today for something the City might or might not do in 10 years. r, 5~ kK `i Councilor Moore concurred with the Planning Commission's concerns that reservation was an unfair restriction on property owner development rights. w rf - - t Councilor Rohlf stated that he thought that they needed to take into consideration = 4~ 4 I x r- N landowners' rights and find alternative language for the last few sections. He 4 3 4 k concurred that they needed protective language to give the Council guidance to deal Z. with situations that were near takings but felt that they did not need to push the _ t Constitution to et as much as legally }Yaa~ ` g possible. He said that he would be supportive, - of language that was more neutral and balanced. He stated that he thought it was t- - s , incumbent on the City to purchase land or work a deal with the landowner for land ~ ~ - they were seriously interested in developing. ~ v - 11 { € - ' ,'c Councilor Moore asked if the burden would be on the City to prove that it really + ~ 4,1 t needed to reserve a portion of a developer's property. Mr. Bewersdorff said that E , 11 staff had to be very sensitive to that issue because they did not want to preclude the 4 -M right of development. He said that often staff would ask for an easement fora s_- At, t pathway and include a limitation that if they didn't come back with a location within - g $3 ~ . _ ' a a year, then the right to the easement expired. z }z t t Councilor Moore said that they hadn't heard this language limiting the City to a ~ K~ I' ~ reasonable amount of time. Z' : ~a k ~w e j Councilor Rohlf said that he was opposed to the language because it did not seem , , ~ fair to the landowner. r r l r - -Tex , - r r , dt j- Y - kA t_ - 4 t - X,+..x as 3= , ~ iii i l vuill ii vlt> 11iV17 MINUTES - MAY 14, lyyb - PAGE 13 i= r t' C A t'" 4 t.. 7" - t Z t X F- J} 'i } _ _ _ - t x k s v - - - ~ "yS 3 <3 - k ~ t ~ g v 5 7 .5- b'3 - - - Y Y b t ; x -A s - i f r -r r r ' i-..a - - - - y - k r~ _ F - q X 5 C L f i -7' P K-4 - r 33 P(tk - - - F $ - - _ y - ..z'~.i M~§."~„-. -aa ccrir~ ar +~.-s:at Syr-. :m 3rij. x5a+ r,vc: yew :'S _ yE - a.a._...._+ _ - -fix' 7 't _ - . r _ _ - - - Al a5 as->rN ~~t ' ' ' - ~ - - , " - , ~ ~ - M - 7 t_"~', . ~k " Ent ' ' ' ' 'i , 1 S' - - - - T i',Z - 111. I r q$r'3 ? 1 - Elf ~m, txx3'~ ....._._.....r........,~ .z-s.,c..aaz.,.s`x..._,_._......_........w.. ...~_'_.v...,_„ - T d's - 3 d e _ - ft} YZ s ae q _66 L- r, ;3i , Councilor Scheckla asked if the Council had to take action on this tonight. Mr. t r } . Ramis said no, staff brought this forward to start the discussion. Mr. Monahan said "t-' X " R . ~ -w that they could put this on the May 28th agenda, € 3 , _ st^~'"a`~' ' -x t c- c_ as - 0. - i , - ~ ,-f- z 8. PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET t ;i ' To discuss a proposed supplemental budget for 1995/96. - a 1 ~w,t~~ ~i if _ =r l 1 kw'J~'h~- 1b- ' z a. Open Public Hearing }f;- 4 -F w,~--~ri.4 i - Mayor i~iwii .^.p~.... s~.~``n ,d,. ~ .y - F ad the public hearing. _45 t 3 f i b. Declarations or Challenges: None ' , ` - ~ , - t r _ c. Staff Report z ~,~a S, I Wayne Lowry, Finance Director, presented the staff report. He directed the k -'u r Council to the supplemental budget for the current fiscal year contained in the e, I packet. He said that the proposal was advertised as required with no concerns raised rx % g ~ # pk r s at the Budget Committee. _ _ Yt r ? r z; ' - Councilor Rohlf asked about the Tupling gift and whether or not there would be a ti u ~ said - j how dtosu tithe oney nthoughrheMand ahan the Mayor haveytnet withtMrt Tdeci upl g ~o t " , 4 ION ~ ~ ^ = discuss potential uses of the funds, and would meet with him again when staff had ,r r.<u' 1 ''M = R some ideas. He said that he thought Mr. TuPling's recommendation was not to have ; -=.K A.Wt - . =Y -,tip j,.. 3 a sign, though he might change his mind based on the project. k >y O~ ' ~ - 3 v{ ~3 Councilor Rohlf asked about the time frame for proposing a project. Mayor Nicoli * Momp F < My_ Y k`t,, a+ said that he thought it would be better to wait until they had identified all the land h ` t u they were purchasing. He noted that Mrs. Tupling had been very interested in - ' wildflowers and that possibly they could use the money to put a pathway through a _'.'7 ~ ri natural area. SR' t x = , d. Public Testimony - None w : s ' t s _ ' e. Staff Recommendationg~ `t 11 C 3' r r fl, z' Mr. Lowry recommended that the Council adopt the resolution adopting the.x" supplemental budget for 1995/96. A, 1 i 4 R s ti ~ a as 11 r ° a r a f. Council Questions T ` ; i - ~ MW r$ g. Public Hearing was closed ` ' six - i F"" Mayor Nicoli closed the hearing. ,x , .1'" { t -l -W, '1 ~n I r I -L I F h. Council Consideration -Res. No. 96-31 ¢ N- ~r . . t ,ij - y~ ` Moved by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution ;i''" l t, - 101"k v; _ No. 96-31. ' t r s s t s - COUNCIL viEi✓i1Nt M1IVUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 14 ' ~ , 11 5 1.5' +4 P F i r yys-,a „3 1-' y = - *w 1, : t n£ 3'~ 9i x t i 5,, r4M . i t v`✓ rrY - (U SSS F- E - -J .x. d j 4 Tom' ,y- f.t5, 4 h Y t f+ L' 1 a , , '~;~"V;-"~";- .36. L - , 2J ~ - j. - t a 3 - _ ) ` ' } 3 y' S 4 u kw,i--y a s'_; jtrtf t - 3% i - c- t- ' ' - , , . ~ ~ ,"a - - ~ ~ ~ " , ~ F: I . - xl - - - - - i --n` y . _ .n r ~*+i f a .'t n ~~r ~ K c.`' ' = o -71- r;, +€k~ a. - Jz F- - _ _ - - r - , _ ++~L~~~LL T~r'E }SC' _ 8~ MK a _ , a^~, y-F 21- Yh - } S iV,, _y _ ,t - - - ~ -s ti - - " - y ' .....,ln~:..wv........w...»..n,._............W.__ . i- _ - ,.W_. t' h - 3 w'~4A A. 6 h .J i ...-.....,.--..;.:>8_.e.-. - r m 3} ` The City Recorder read the resolution by number and title. ~ ~ s, t Resolution No. 96-31, a resolution creating the FEMA disaster fund and approving EA n*~ k 5~ 5 " i a supplemental budget for 95196. a ~x 'I r n r s ' - ran t The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor k_ x s y f F , Nicoll, Councilors Moore, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes".) 4 - ' R ~ a 9. CONSIDER WETLANDS MITIGATION ON CITY PROPERTY - BOWEN , , ~ ; AA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L < - t x* t a. Staff report ` ,a ~-1 Mr. Bewersdorff presented the staff report. He directed attention to the staff memo r ~ ~,F t - ' distributed at the April work session which explained this request from the Bowen g £ t ; f Development Company to use City property for wetlands mitigation. He reviewed t - the situation. In 1988, a development company dedicated the wetlands portion of w ,z f its property to the City for a development that never happened. Now the Bowen 3, ;f, ~ ~ company wanted to develop the remainder of that property only to find that the M " wetlands have moved onto their property. They were asking to fill in .17 acres of ` ; r m z!~Y,Z wetland with an offset of .618 acres of mitigation. ~ d T,, ' ~ Mr. Bewersdorff noted that this was an isolated case, and that the City might not be a' able to get a similar dedication of wetlands today. He said that he thought this -k , would be good for the City. =Wyr t L:J Mr. Bewersdorff pointed out the attached draft policy relative to wetlands mitigation. x y ` 11 ~ ? Mr. Monahan reiterated that this was a unique case with some obligation on the part - r of the City to assist in allowing mitigation on City property because the particular City property under discussion originally came from the land owned by Bowen. He s ~ , ' said that the draft policies would protect the City in the event of future requests; r staff has already turned down one request to allow mitigation on other City land for 'i? i -tt 5 a development outside the city. s i 1- ~'4 t i b. Council Discussion/Questions _ _,w-Y, ~N s d Councilor Scheckla asked if a bike path was planned for the area. Mr. Bewersdorff # to ' said that the development north of the wetlands precluded a pathway. He reported k; that staff did consider asking for a pathway but that the developer of the apartment : ' , n ~ i Y j complex did not want to dedicate the area and staff would have a difficult time it proving rough proportionality.r - r{ Councilor Scheckla asked if they would be opening themselves up in the future to - $ j other similar requests. Mr. Bewersdorff said that to prevent similar requests was " , ~ I..... If the purpose of the draft policy. It could be used to guide the Council regarding 11 ~ ~y future cases of wetlands mitigation. ~k x # , - , Councilor Scheckla asked if legally they could make this a one time instance. Mr. -x~ k ::rrrrrl ' - - Ramis said that he thought they could, given the unique set of facts. He said that t ,i '~r~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 15, - 't 4 11I",' \ Y , t, 55 -A 11- 4 i- - , - rp.t t - N y 4 1 ✓ - - J 3 _ _ 't _ - _ 'I * t _ - r~ F4 - s '1 a .1" rr. - - _ 1x r j L A t U , ~.~~:i,~, , ~ I . ; , , I" : . 1. ~ - , ~ . : ~ , , , , , , , ct , . ~n .-I , , , 6 , , , .A J . .6 a. recr, •q i6;~* N .f ri r -..e x roc ci! - ro f.- r r"*'~,' ~ - - - - - -,y x no s g'~, 2 --g.-. -''P,, -t - t = - r N t t~ -t ;gz S4 54 Y#' 3 _ t _ '.c -a - 7..E f P~ it J t _ - - - ;"a a - - 3- =~y,~,{ „44r L-r Y - L~:w..+rm,E.~e,c...„t. ,kn - _ - s { _ try' -i 1- t n F# 3 r r 8t Y arm ° y, * te'yp ; _ , V ? ' t Councilor Scheckla asked if legally they could make this a one time instance. Mr. F - ;L , 5 ,?,!„T r"_ , .,ti,,,..:,t Ramis said that he thought they could, given the unique set of facts. He said that i a a- r;- . "t:;_,, _ t r£ they could emphasize its uniqueness in their decision and then develop a policy to ~ { ,a tir t preclude this sort of thing. a h-. Councilor Scheckla expressed concern that moving the wetlands could create more ~ - ` i" a problems. Mr. Ramis commented that the could not draft a law to protect 5, ` themselves from Mother Nature. However they could make sure that they had Y - Y Ly r - 4 Y <w $ a rI policies that required improvements of wetlands. Mr. Bewersdorff pointed out that y: = enhanced wetlands were a better storage for flooding and a benefit to the City. a lV- Y i -s- c. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 96-32 r 'rr } didn't have ...ano_, r_-- nrnhtem with this resolution. He + Mayor IVICUll sniu u.a. . . - concurred that the City owed it to a property owner to work with them when the ' , j i owner had dedicated land for wetlands in the past only to have a hardship created , . because of natural changes. He noted that this was a gift to the City that they - p probably couldn't get today. ` ~ - , i Councilor Scheckla stated that he did not see this as a gift to the City because they ~;,<t~4 :3 , ' did it in order to get what they wanted. - 1- , "ate Mayor Nicoli noted that they could no longer place a condition on a developer to - ' `t , ~ ~ ` give them land because of Dolan. He reiterated that he was comfortable with . working with the owners on this. t. , ~ ' Mr. Monahan pointed out that usually land was not dedicated until construction of rig,- ~ a project began; the applicant in 1988 dedicated the land and then decided not to .k I develop. He suggested an amendment to the resolution to add a third "whereas" to ;r c< €,rs read "Whereas the City owned land was dedicated in conjunction with the 1988 site "A i development review that was not developed on the same property as shown Fir Road ; - -11~X 3 . ti> , LLC" and to add under "Resolved" a statement "that the City finds that the unique r - ` circumstances of this application make it appropriate to grant the mitigation in - recognition of the 1988 dedication." He said that this would record that this was a - _ £ n; ! IV; fft t 1, t very unique situation. " 4 1 1- Councilor Scheckla stated that he liked the amendment. ~ - ~ ~ Councilor Rohlf concurred with confining this unique circumstances. He also agreed ~ with the staff recommendation to develop a policy to deal with this issue, citing the x , t 7 trend towards more infill. ~ , & Mr. Monahan reviewed the six items listed in the staff draft policy: benefit, y4 ? r a~ I physical enhancement of existing wetland, compensation to the City, no additional I z - t costs to the City for maintenance, location of developed property within the UGB, r ' and no potential onsite mitigation possible. - , { Mayor Nicoli suggested setting over the discussion on the policy to a future agenda I r,- . and dealing tnniiahr -iu. 'u,e resol'u'tion. Fi'"^'- - d j~ - t' x CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -MAY 14, 1996 -PAGE 16 ` - 4 Y'- ' S- - - ! Z` ' j A j'' a' { F 'r p i 2 5,s - 3 tkj 3 4 3 fi s f` 4 - y 1, 4- 1 f F t } j+ fZ { +5 'Y lj F~f, p i x t Y ~,,I - ~L , I 5 - Y a - r- 4 i „ - . - - - , rx ~e , ; =mot ems} f " ``}.r ;s jr3 Paz! - -s S _n - i 9~ Y _ Yf a - a n x `"'"J' r. - y, z • E ."f MW- -J"- E_ _ v et T 0 11 M L'Y~j'R h i i' _ - S S - ~ ~ ` `.rz- " 2 { i 'h .,f - - J r t 'S' a - 4 - t tz k c, 7 - -r } : r NUJ, r -1` 1~ - 5» k' ~4A' ni 2_ _s..~..J..u~.+....r-s.-a _ ..aSy. . c.... - ...•..e_..~ ......s.....:...........-.... , ~A A- t( ,;P `M1$ xY'i^l c r Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution r r6 " ° No. 96-32 as amended. KrT ; ' Vi a The City Recorder read the resolution by title and number. >p z v_ L~N4.:..~ fS,f, r •`i-:"" F:`rv'e t+Y:. - x'4''rt', p,t.- =N} , :°2Y= ' °aVlr '=y' Resolution 96-32, a resolution to allow Scholls Ferry Road LLC and/or affiliates k t a,a rx a r ` * to create and/or enhance wetlands on city owned greenwaY, TIS, R1W, East 1/2 of i ~ - _ 11 - at* v 4 p u Section 23, Tigard, Oregon. 1Z x f'- s f4r 4 e ~ i'l r ; + The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor , A 4 - - 1 Nicoli, Councilors Moore, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes".) ~kw~ 14'i 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS rv} ~ ` ' x * r ; Mayor Nicoli asked the Council to give staff direction to proceed with developing !~7 a recommendation on how they wanted to proceed with architect services on the r ~t" - t .l addition to City Hall. He noted that the process would take anywhere from 4 - 8 M sue, weeks but that getting an early start would allow staff to begin as soon as possible 012RMb~ f - F after the July 1 budget began. k- , 4 ; ~r s Mr. Monahan noted that it was a lengthy process with the new purchasing rules. He , ~ s r x „ !h Q4 A n said that they would not be back with a recommendation before July 1 but that they f~ ,r„} A t could do a lot of the up front work and hopefully get better prices and a quicker --'W , a beginning to the process. ,~i, j, 'aMzg'"~k 1 ~ The Council agreed by consensus to direct staff to proceed as discussed. 1 , n:. 11. ADJOURNMENT: 9:32 p.m. a ' r r L6. - S A W -.T,,, ~ 1•,~ Attest: atherine Wheatley, City Recorderw E, 1 M gya w n. - } §a AT;gyp 4 is ix i.: ` -a e , (,'1 of Tigard <t a $ rfl~~ N< fifi[. Date: u,, Q I l~1q y ~ cj, -4~ , t , Y " ? bid 3w t - If sS` t eA~aorae kem\u.,,asta.9n yv. r ts' a a+ a' """."'"r E-- V" +v.~. 217;77711 - x a zzz iTi. i ,X r ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 14, 1996 - PAGE 17 n ` ;11 - F` ^ a. aril -a -,--,m, ~ V' t~ t 1 s tdt f A { ! - ~,t'- .u,y C'. x' fir.., ,%"15 . r c' t $ ' tz a F E - M r f = u -t1 - a _ ' - - - F _ A _ tom, r„ j t ¢ . ,z<^9 - r } 2s _ c _ z yz,, r 14.J, 11 `cgs Fr. {71ti'F 3 4 - } _ - - „c .<'°'rr s - r : t "p' - - 1 1,^" Y A ft ?aL§L'~ a rk rx~s` s _ a _ _ aj rY , } x Y - T, - - y_ F i- a '4,J 6 r, _ _ r - y _ - - s> l - aasssiri=c=am ' _ - S - - - f j , +s~ e - s r t om'- ~ - - * a O ' . P``rti - t - r Fs z - _ r t ~ u~' t a 4`F A 41 k" i ti `t'ag- ~x r °~s.a.:~,'' x- - ' - r . `f. - " _ ate..-tea. , , ,~a ~ , A., - 'I, "I x, t x-„ - y , k - -;.~^t P,d$-cf a cig"o-~ rX~t,' "n, J1 ,a..~a>3• - z c x t r..a it-s j,3`~ 'g'~ ''-i. rylz - - 7 - _ - r*r x ate'-.nr~ r7~ x . zr , x t rr c~,.+A. 7+€~'~ - [ rTrx r t r~r'''~t - " , 9a . MS`S a S - I w7~ ~-t_ 5 _'Hq5 ' 4 _ 'q3 g, xr, t 141i ;1 fit f. R ] COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. f ~g ' t E c e I ¢l.4x81otice t~ r~ Y ~ 3,. T - z : P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 664-0360 V N TT 8 481 .s r - A lj _ 4._ BEAVERTON.OREGON 97075 MAY I ,k~laE: , . 3- A Legal Notice Advertising k 1 ; t- - _ iIIY OF.71GAkD r4 k Z.,{x Q_g £ f ' .City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice , : T7 - 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ;'9TT ' * * •Ti and Ore on 97223-^oi^^>g • O Duplicate Affidavit , a x , Accounts Payable:Terry y° ~ • .,r -c -;.1-, . _ , 00 W. et.^, - 11 fiJ O L4 h - arY !f-6),,.~,r,'nSl-R ' s - ~,;,r- y 7 ",^T.x,7-t;tsahftn 5 - -a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION a"~2BiCr0A ~ + - u r 4, STATE OF OREGON, )as. err. ;q F~ = l 2^ vA , - COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) t r % ! I. Kathy Sn~d~r _ - ? t~ z r being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising w 4 t ; Director, or his principal clerk, of the`ri qar~-m„ai a*; „ mimes 3 r r - is newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 ~`t~~.t , fit and 193.020; published at m; Bard _in the •yR ~ r'~ - x - - aforesaounty and state. that the ; _ b id c Suoolem n a1 B,dga~5/9ti rvA_n3-0.009 rI asses s a- A a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the s - L Z entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and~r r a,'h~' _ q x consecutive in the following issues: - xs~g, -:5 a~ 4 E, MdV 9 1996 'L w Y + #4 ; ",tea,"x x Subscribed and sworn to re me this 1 h r7ay of.tav. 1 996 Oi F::!At SEAL , c , E` - ROE r'~. sESS n" .f'a 3'~ r a y fx : *i07A: OREGON , 'w a car & - r'~ a Notary Pu for Oregon `x:', !n c :fu.024552 1,11- 3 I n F 4 1.<: C 510'1i.'PIHES biPY 18,1997 x ~ ? " , s My Commission Expires: uµ , ~ r L a - AFFIDAVIT _ 4 ~ , R- 'Er I $ Tt sy - f I 7".s ~'~'Y Ys if "}k'7 d.`^ ' i * y~ x I _t 1i I ~,t.!• 3 r ~,rorra.. w:, - x •x .tee r.w--rte ~.,-~«,.-•.z..,,,..,.----.. t~4 y ~.,ca- s ry'a - f i`~,s I~- ~fis3 L-;,P, IA _Sy r'-f# SP3 i 'S { 3 7 - l - r } ks 6 f.r u 3 Y _ t - SM, 2 sr s,k•' , 4` r pti k t t c + - _ s 07A 't"'4 ) _3 t Bch t~S.3`'s' rrz _ t 4 r•C' 2c"P3• 11 M~AMf r3 r( odf_tTyYU - { { _ - f i t. - 4 rk°f- F F{y .y, ° fS€ P j- S y T T - - - k - _ , .y.5 - "~,.i cix- +d ra~ri r ac v.'- n4wq,. ~t -.c ar 4. `t 'yn "'is w.r ~....r._ _ y yt J amp` - ~ - r - 4^ s*`- - 7"r_ Tl' -s,~,c Sri t _ _ i t ; _ -1, 3 '''f - try. ~ t = ,e ~ 3 u; S 3 ' 4g r - r - - £ K 60 A _ 3 x € ~l M r { sY~,'`~,.i .,,~a 4t i e - - - - f s - 4 off ,a' .-t r if➢ t a. .1-1 uera.._x.. ..,.,.._.w_a..iy,,.~..s...~.... ,.F.,..u.._.w:. ....._s._. a - o* ir? ir? +c ~ 7- - * - ' nx 1e, - K kj,K~',-, P S*➢ - - } y j€ ~J ~ 3 d t ,;L :0 F a ,vs .rsx1 ~ i } , ~ - t ,il y Lt V..+ ~ _ _ r - t7,. _ s,, - i 4 k' - , 'P y v - y f ; Yr -q3 S 4 It 4 - , r. r., F i-'' f _ C - 4 `t i M Y Jam' V i Y$ _ -~1 _ d Y s-` - f-- " ` ,,f , p The following meeting highlights are published for our information. Full ° I } Y agendas may be obtained from the City Recorder, 13125 S.W: Hall ~ - ~ i ~ -i 2 s Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639 4171; ti c } CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING x , S , , May 14.1996 TIGARD CITY HALL-TOWN HALL r iP r 13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON k i v r Study Meeting SRed Rock CieekRoom) (6:30 PM.) x • Executivd Session: The Tigard City CounciCmay g6 into ' k M~Ij c' 5 1 12 ~ 11.1 1. - ' , Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) is a 1' F? Ar, z - , (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions 4_ i current and Rending litigation issues i i r, ' _ ? _ 'Agenda Review r Business Meedag (Town Hall) (7:30 P M) ~ < ~ Y, w 7'p . s K ; Update -.Oregon Food Support Services of Washington ` a , County ,-Available Services;- - n s e rr ~a r - - Council Consideration: ' a i£ x f a: VHlaningProject-ShouldCttyProceedwithpro}ect9 tax r -s - , ~ PN Public Hearings;. ' • ` Supplemental Budget for 199S(96 " - V Via{ F _ Amend Community Development Code to Add Dedication, } ' - x > Reservation, and Impact Study Requirements for Public w ''3 lficilities and Servkes , . - i -f i q • ''A►btrtsaq's IncJDuarnmbe LUBA Remand Com rehensivo r P1an'Ameitdment (CPA) 93-00092one Change (ZQNg93 0003 , ~s " Site Deve~lopmeat Review (SDR) 93-0014/Minor Land Partition x ti r ? (MLP) 93-0023 a' r a ((Continued from the Apnl"23;1946 Council meeting) ' K_ ~ ~t fsr TT8491 Publish May 9, 1996. . ? r # + 1 Jai { F T~E L 1- t `t 4. 43 3-➢g ki 1 4 j n i t 3 0. 'I r x N 3 , 3 a - 4 gym. r. ' EEE M _ - i# i y+ yh _ ~t S '~4 i y k t, t s t a 4 F rid, r r f~„, r - t FFp, 5 .',,r'q~_";'-'~,'~~;,,~~~~,,'F',"~r~~,~~,,,,~, , , - ' ~ I Ir - - 7i , , " L S. ii44~~.~_.,I. - _ q-{f'r - 5 t4 i _i a7- _ Mfr i t _ ~CC l t S _ ^f R" - fr"Fr } i~ - Ili :j . . c Win, p•m t ,.ZRE Fs„jam n -s _ '~,v .5' ` r a v r T r t t a f- _ r.~ s y5. t"-KK~-^r r. -1 11 .,4,.:5 _ `^t~-~'C~ . - _r ~ " ~"i,$' t'f-'""r .LTG - f- J +4 - °-~e.'S"r k.°,+ye a ux? 3-4 rn~i ii, M ~ ~ , t~ T ( til ;n- ct`~"`w" ASS. '~''s'jl'•"4 bi~ ~ x L Jy . ~ttt.U~0,17R,Mrl - 1, ~ ' x COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal r - { ' P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684.0360 'R C E) Notice TT 8 4 7 4 ~ ~5 f 1X _ - BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 a Legal Notice Advertising t~ ` ; ` "I i Y Of 71GARG _ y ' " ' • City of Tigard • 13 Tearsheet Notice g ; > r ti r, x 13125 SW Hall Blvd. a + ~ a L'Rl - . ~ t • Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • 13 Duplicate Affidavit ~e gp z n'om'" sr n- 3 • Accounts Payable:Terry 4~ Z t, } a r - F ' nr AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION i n t" . ~ s s w 1 _ t " .,.r- - -.3 STATE OF OREGON, ) '.rti'r- ~e } i} 2 x+ COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )s" Az r, ,,f' _ - ) Kathy Snyder ~r_a # ~ T being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising r a N x ' Director, or his principal clerk, of thdC4 aarA-m„a 1 a+; in mimes i ks a + e a newspaper of general circulatioq as defined in ORS 193.010 t , d _ ~ ' O and 193.020; published at Tigard in the 4 , ` aforesaid co~n Wand statthat the zFt l ' , 't s _ ZOA 96-0003 Co-, ~rLm Dey Code c-_1 u r t a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 'i _ entire issue of said newspaper for_ ONE successive and e - consecutive in the following issues: I i „ .11 - s - 5 - y May 2,1996r t O ?t s t Ftzzxa)+~~ E { 1 . 1 y , ~q I rs rqf = V fr tx +a~'6" Subscribed and sworn to fore me this 2nd Aa- of rtaay 1996 OFF:'_!X SEAL dr rk a~ d 7` a NOROEf A.e t 1.- OREGON ~ 6 s r , ~ 2, ~1075,11'IhAAI " ^ - r tY , Notary P c fo Oregon OMA no. 024552 Af{ ! i t h ; MY C( +1$1 1 EIWMES MAY 16,1997 ;c z ~rl ~ y x, ° My Commission Expires: , , x41 r`f3,_ - r 'z AFFIDAVIT - z i _ { _a4t _:16 trs - .a_r - fa " j' 11 4 ~ ~ ~ Qom) .r7' n x'` a,+ k>s _ d a rA Y` r~5~"3t„°" } F c ,.yT~c m 7 t' d ^'~~r .tr.~, y , skyy.. t - - - t~h"" .Y r..re,~ r - a x~ d r>:., #r.`c~ rnn r.,><.'".. ^°°w"~^^""^= ^r 'z~ `i, wf F r - e 4, .ter ^~'tS3a ' y - t / 'td -k - " f~ d na sr N r~A% b.R",~.,ft' `~*",1 ,P r _ L Y I - 7 i 4` A ,`.i 1^~ ' `f .ft4,k r .°r,`-i - € - s F r > - Q'&, L3 s^ M } k I. -1 xr ~*c~'-y~} d rz a rv ' t t l •s,~x Zk` r / 4 -xr xa h s~ r, $ zx. ; 'us Y ! rt t, - t e .3 : - r ; C F ':a''~7s`"ss,. 114 t ~ r, r 1 ~ 4 4 r r cur p. r f rt t~'t _ .rte ,P f ^s• s z -r L qe W. t x n w i-a K i 7 ° r s ~qY 'w c gyp` y+ - g~}tY ~t _.d'}', S 'r- 4.r 'Ct,n P K G d'~r! r._. i_ rr 1 -41' t, E "Y Zr tp 4; x -.F d obA,141-, , t /r 2 J I ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ r - , ~ , - 4 'r ~_t t _ - , Y w'° ^ r.U }9,. ,y # £ w.r~.3` hT{h`i' - f- '4 "i Hf.M Y,11.r- _s y, lK T,YP r...~ . 11 s,.. - . ,F- ..._7 ,.,ate, iz-rxa rxa,r. Yfi - _~„v's~=s=um a Y u - - - - - - t 1114EM ~ ,lex _i- _-_,i~~ - - -71 - ~ g k v- 37 - - ? - - i - t y 4 _ +v L` \ 1 - - ter,- - u .rf 3 t - x! -rr - t - S - 1 l •:g r-' to----~_ - . "~•:•t~ t.~s k 1 t, h _ , s4T L 'F 3 -4 Y s--' ; - } f t e s c_° c - r - U'' 't - ,,ter ;Rae °s The following wilt bo considered by the Tigard City Council on ,a , May 14. 1996 , at 7:30 P.M., at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, t _ s & ~s ' - 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard 'Tigard; Oregon: Both public oral and written i x - } s testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted - Rw, ` z-' + in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal ¢ Colic, and an rules and procedures adopted bYtheT - Y t tgard City Councti y . 1W y : nr mlca of nrt~cellure set [vth in Ch anter1R_ q(f. - -*•v~:iY'." s -11 Failtue to raise an issue in person of by letter at some point prior to the - t , s close of the hearing accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to ; ~ g g. - + _ < i allow the Hearings authority and all the parties to respond on the request, a ,t precludes an appeal to the Land Use Boats of Appeals based on that issue.. K f1 ; rom k 1- I Codeaor C to Specify Plan at whicfh a Comment smdirect preclu~ean ` ' - ~ ~ c ' r appeal based on that criterion. Further informations available at City Hal! . .r ~ a ~ ,ter, tt "I and may be obtained from the Community Devetapment Airector or City . z - + x , - s Recorder at thus sarue location or by calling (503)16394171-. - s , - .11 , $?x"' z PUBLIC HEARING n` y 20NE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 96 0003 ,0'_ , DEDICATION, RESERVATION AND~ 1s IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS : -~-e~, The City of Tigard proposes amendments to the Community Deve mt ot_ . 1 , d .1 " j J_ Code Sections 18.32.050 B.S. ia.32.2So E.2: t8.96,01o A: aad 1$ if10 - I 1-01144W4 - g-21 A.'and B. to refluire impact study, resew anon ittd 'dedicau gnue s " x 4; £ - ~ ` ss# _ I 1, for public facilities and services. LOCATICf+I: Citywide. ZONE. N/A - s £ - e , "x APPLICABLE REVIEW. CRITERIA: Statewide Plarming Goals T; 2 _ rF f~ r 21I and 12. .3, 3 7 and gam;, Community,Development ~e policies 1830 c 2 1 i; 4 ~ - 0~I 3 r TT8474 Publish May $.1996.. , x ~ n ~k i 4* y-, ° , I~ 11 k F5x { # ~ IF- ' 3 ~A d[ - SL i. 1 J - £j- _ i Fvt'A 4 _ 3 _ _ , d`''=S t' u r 7 L+ ~ _ f~' Ate f' .1 q L t13. ~ ✓ t 4 t -kt j - - a . J a C y L E j e~ ~'k - , SSE a 4 ~ t , Ak f It K t34 X r ` { A '.~~~I'L` - - " - - L ' ' ~ ' t ~ ~ ' - 2J, ~ t ,a w I" - r z _ r 1 i ✓ 1 3 _ r L Y i 7 ~ - e 4., r i + i _ - - t'- } - a t b II 3 t- ~I'd. i` = rya _ - - - - - -64 V, $ Fryers CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON #s a~ k L l.r'r' ,tom Y4 r et AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING % *ra { In the Matter of the Proposed R#xa~ fir' z Y~' 4 f y~ h~ -p;1%p. u s f. STATE OF OREGON f t County of Washington ) ss. 1 A}r~ - ' r - f City of Tigard 17 W, y, begin first duly sworn, on oath, Y 1N~ depose and y: `WNW ? - Number That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinances z , s K 64 ~ ill k{~ S . s { r which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated IM wo- 14 _q (0 copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the ~s # day of 19~IM ~3^ { M, C. 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon ,y 41 A~- 2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 5 , 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon A R [ + A xk~ al, Iixf V z €w R, r Subscribed-and sworn to before me this Stt day of , 19 9 + 4L YxtYt oFFiciALSEU Notary P~fi lic for Oreg n s#x'd - f M JO ANN HAYES NOTARY PUBLr OREGON !<'Iy Commission Expires: Yn.4, S'. I R^25' F ,r coMM~ssioN NO.odztas T kCf COMMISSION _MAES MAY 05. IM tw1U T' "CTa'~Y 3--'~----~w.,,,s - ,.x°3 -rte t ) k ~.NN s 3 % % j.0 , z 114 .t,ft,. KY Y 4j' - 1 d e . r,..: ,~:n - z z - - 6 y ; 4. - h _ - P^-,y?-Zc-:y:?z, Y t -'h a~ n x V '4. M. S ~ t . $ .n^ fi - A i^2-,8'y a"- ae ~ I. t~ 3 ~t~F i=met r c - - = g; ? a ' c z- s 'c Y 0~ ~-.y.. j-lt -TI~ acv . Ni. z ? , ,e'~tx r.~ - 4k'3 z." ,%"sM ! 4{ - -Clem A, -z' „il s ` CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON.k n - M a x r n ` ORDINANCE NO. 96- 0 0 1~ • `F'°" sot n ' Star M, "fit sr ; 11, ti s - ' s s rx } Fit; _ ~y. c.- c` I W"11, 7N~ , t-t4, i W+ - , a gel ; r , ~ 't b" i, 31 4t -11 .w r AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A°. xa,`€ ' x COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT F'4- , ` ~'~r ~tj~-' $ $ ; k t h REQUESTED BY ALBERTSON'S INCORPORATED (CPA 93-0009 AND ZON 93-0003). } + u*' r - - ' - i ~z " r `s a WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from Medium- i j Hiah Density Residential to redesignate approximately 8 acres of a 11,95 acre p:rcrel from j lvlediurn-High Density Residential to Community Commercial and a Comprehensive Plan a I ~ ti3 w s 3 a" ~ $ _ - } - ; approval to redesignate a 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium-High u zz y rroasResidential. Aant-2 include p Changes t'`t"* C; a,' ,-1 r P Pose to redesignate he property from R(PD) and R 25(PD) (Residential, 12l25 units Per , - }j + `;k ;n 7s'^ acre, Planned Development to C-C (Community Commercial and C-N (Neighborhood- ` 7 t',° t s a Commercial) to R-25 Residential, 25 units per acre). " - I ; - r x ? ry NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: R , Wt Rl-, 11, ~t r - 11: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon the facts, findings '~g K ~ 5-sr and conclusions, noted in the attached final order, additional findings and vicinity maps 1~ft si. z,.;, ~ . identified as Exhibits A, B, C, D-1, D-2, and D-3 (Albertson's, Inc. Remand Statement with ? . t ' attachments). Exhibit A is the facts, findings and conclusions pertaining to the remand decision, and where conflicting shall take precedence over Exhibits B and C (the facts, findings and h~5 $ ' conclusions pertaining to the prior approval dated December 27, 1994). , r r , T4 t, q s SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, ~ A R, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. eE -fit -f _ a -5 4 8 R- e PASSED: By U OOLYI'<<YnouS vote of all Council members present after being read t , E by number and title only, this 1'-~ Phday of -Ty ,1996. , l,~~ ~ ey,~~ 1 ) - ]i r xis y^` cT r fi t'* ~ 3 - 77 ~ ~7 r1 n /}non 3 5 ` -'7 1ti~1 fc.2~ ~..~t LA-D ~-A G f L-~ S , - ; g* , ~.'y~~ ytyii y. # ~ _ `f f _ Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder g°~ , - ~ _ _ ~ 3t' - s7 ryj~ I- - _ iS.b", fb'ar A a'v 7 f' { 'a ` ' 4 ORDINANCE NO. 96 - 0O ` _ ~ - Sad r Y Page 1 d r < r -l. r•~^ x~ l~ G - s ,r 4 tom... - `x z d 5 ai ni _ w~.~r.r^ -•-~...m-r+..,.nsa~~raaucs': r-a;ts7m ''g" e'~.' a~'' f.rm'a.,:w~ - s-, w; .e ~[".rim J - /i,f} l f Si# - r ((t - - - - - 5 ~..sf is S ! F .r+-.' - _ - t z sj, "'a iry S~ _ t 1 _ fi ,i k ,.*7 r l `3 ,9P~ s d t1 'F t ! l 2b ,x rsA p} ' p £ a~`"' h p r _ r - r_ j r l`y~, fi3,y r ! 4 L 'v 4 - vS t x> i L - , L ~ -1" .1 I ~ - 11 , e ~ - - , ~ r . : , ~ T ~ ~ L - ' . +'.r- G G A - - r - - 3 n .h.. .k wa,;, xi+: -a °n a W': .4 v: r:. <;p .,e Mr NS: "1r ,°t ••St ♦r:,a pv,- W, i i- { - i ~ i di ; :4 - ~t~N: r 1-s.:'^-t „A:'•, :,n,{ " .S;ti":V_" i•~1 4 d -a 3 : Ce e~ "E'~ n,r„ Pi,^i+. & rid, : 4~ , Y•n't,r . s„4 ' . i n.T' .,J: M «s"' 4{'' -5 R rY }1 . P w. &a 4`G 'H n,,x,?.. •x ,.c'V` 4 ,F"--'. ~a °.¢~:,_s'd::,a .d,. T ,.13ax,=~w11.°..tNrT'a n'aA~-' 'r Ly;,, 'MSa'~'"•~, '„C: 1,p a7~'; 4•„ ~;r>Fl, os.. J. .t '~a.- .,Yk''- 3°& A + v,t~ .~h ,`rat kY'n .EtP;rz.,, Y i;e• f>r .~tl^ . .e'";J.t 3', , "5"a,~.'1'~'~,:,n ~i i I-- ~ t a .,a'°.- , E ea`r. .s' . ,x „r _it ..r,,o g..rr<t r rap, u'~.' ,~',N~"' m;'a, ?f+•`t„ r..,,,Y,°n 'd?s;,s~k~-^.-'r , "+,4';, a•€`~a +;Y . ~'M e~ag,ti ~ r. +x,., w,at , ~i -„l;sk , .s a-w,r ',t°#~, ¢ k,•~,9 _ ..Av,. 'fir ,4',c:~x" rz~=~"n'o r~ ,s'k •i. ,fie. Y a. ~r'-: ^:rF,. a• "s'Y.' R, s~'r_~~'`i9`~~'~.,, ar'»-sd~'S+'. "ua•.,`K,w'~ ,.u=t y3 «^r~r «;2{..,. a,~''~k ~>d , , P ".rv . ,1`., 1` ,°~°rM, V rpn ; r }>:-•.#"e°;,`. n .r'l: `ti*x'v" ' , ;t**s rsra.~ ,3' a41*r~,r ' . C L'' r+~., d» zs, <,,:-T d'v- = i'+'a yr'4'° ,rs ~..t A ~;,p{',,~., , ~ b,,. , ,:A ~ ~,t - ~ ~ :m , ` rt - , ~N : iY~r ~k~"~~ r~ -„u"., ,ua"",.~ h_ y:rii°; a,. ,k. ,.x- 'k ..fa x,'.; yy,~,,,,, r'r':L .r.~r" .buc. r-~ to "r w. g t 6 5`u`d^. eN'+-1~ '4 ,Z[r.^. 3-'x" t t"' " `ra.., v E 1.` nC b.=. . ~ vN'• 8 t 4 .,x °K,'=,Y,a. .4G at\P1 .t,~it' ~ ~ _ ,k?„"a a ,;!A-#~.'1.s.+ „ a a'•w3}' . `t~`<`a TM^:w 'a' . ~t:~ a., ar,a, S> ,-e, x...Sm f" . '-:p%is " .1~:~ ' ` r s,'~' a ~ ~i I ~ ~ . ',~'hi."n-~ ~a +h~ , M, >ur ;m. ,1, . r -*:a ~1s`- .tA~":" n.,> 1~ .,"rk:'sxiy; .'.y,;, ~ ~rr•~,a»•, a n it"'e.+v , b 7 `s.'t„ rxia, w,,:" ` Sv, e.tW-•s N'xx, 5`'° <t Y, e"C.~ yy11 ..i`i.-e,=rwx ,">{°'er. -5'* °u.e sd 'c r,,w d.'"vJ'i. Y ,`.;w .fi^w Y'pi-A'= .,yra t W~ .d" .,'r"5," l °^::a°:d';''i .tr °,Sh.-- •,r" ~„r <=.c .~,`i4ys -'3='.. " ~ k ' '"6°x ~~'a ,ra, • i . ~ t ='4r r.° ai 'w,.wwro a- .S a>eL :'~x„ ~i~~„'"'~ ~ - r" rc°7':• .>3, ^•s~,'r -~";t. i.a, ",r-~ ~fr!s-t~ :~~v..M, ~a,~. ~,t~ °~"y~y. pp r, ;G «t.>a r'h'~.~{( ~y^~ •~r; - <'s: ~<•s" y :°~""°r ~ d .~t'., x Lr "-„lutt"V' y . ~"a t °F~ ~ ~ "F, ~ S,M t.rl:fYa•. .B ,S?a. , "r,„~'t.,.A. :d w°~~'.'v, 4 `{.:~.-n vf: ~ ~,^t to 4 - ,k ✓xv;, t:. ."5sa ~ in,9t: ' , if . 7 j 4.. , ~ #r F>rai4 ,g.., ,.'+1.,-.5 ,y» ,~r^ E..._ ,u',. ~r^ ,•Ir,. .Sim '1`!" . T" t 1'ti}"stk°.~, x",,., ;iy' A,P ru,SS ,a < ",:fie„. ~•4 .''':;e~'.r -.ns. p.Sa +•2t<;R¢f ,u«. 3`>~.>x ..'sy^,a~4. "try"L.,W..._ `n^r:.•!,• a..~'4~3' .c ,t~.,f.~ kq°h« ~ a^+i~3'~:b - n t:e,:, ra,' ;"~'r-.~ .,,'°s.~~C` to>« ~:'>r;7 ,,.~a "<aeP°!'ti,~~' {,t~'.?.'" ,,,1'~-r,: k 9':~, 'g.,,, t ~c^' e's ,a p,:„ ~ a.•. as=^+„ L 1 ~ x t~, wu, ,:.r'• ;t r ~lk , - ~.,v d~ . E ~ Y.im '"ti3 1 Cl"i'.-~ FJ+°: i t1' r ..7:. 9i: ^ ,'..r* t3 ^Qd ° ;v[,, ix'.k i, L, -0a,rrr I". s if.'-`• a,~ '}k ~ Y~IW. S„1 nt t '5 .i,a 4 red .T,a c ~t ! S•:``'} i . ,x,%u'e„ r u l 3 v+ ' ~ Z . { ~ F ^,t i .utb,~ „ r« . d ~ '>q •3 nct*' x rlk" w"fe `.3. ,,wt .,"kr'.,,~ .,+b"',: i,,, t. r' Ge "~.r'd.~'- ."a Ctf' g', .{w: ,.u ,3a.. s+ <.n c', ,r'z`- •,a3 ~i„+, ,wf"', "•^~A'~' a{-°°'.~~: r:' `;Y "v r. .,-.~.a n>,`,`,+; 1 t, ,rs"P`". n.lx"•S. 'S ""4 T,,, '°.i ~e .fi'A- 'z: , t A^ . iz-• ^r1`r- ~"F8J v `+L' 0. i „ty ro -xs>;s,. ,G,, 3u :w ok 'an.,r` '•Y rrp^° «Sia,.-t E~, a .a.,- 'Ta'ct. `s 'fix sw`:f, •a:.> -r, ^r °":u^r'x,' ,4, & y ~y",r `s.. stria,,, 1} "C=v,'SPN -C• J>•~i, + Nip h I" Wxg gqh "ai' 1 pv- y k3r ,y\. •..'.Y;w JY'° ) s xi r't Ms r*. r y-'~p.`~,=~', t 4 °q~~ ~5.~, a ! ~~c,•-',;Ix' ~"~tab' ~ y+'a~ ~ u~, t °F d 'k 1 k 'S4 1 P b -also 'b ; Pptkrt a, a- a f e t I t 4 MOM l O r ,%7 no d 17 J9 9 ~'l t "rrtr~¢! #w-`a a~ q, ; p a - n -y ~ x r Z _ ; yJ ~ •P O 7y Tw~+ vs tqq f 7 sa,f 1 1 r - < "y ~ •2 rv O `k` 2 ~1Y, r ~x f' 'r'1'c~hr~}"t~ ' k 11 t p, t ~ v -3 ~ f '.r, KAP IN 0 A .4 -avow R11 NO ' x if i a ti h 1 1 3 1 - ~ } 7 I7 Y N I i y t f F ,r' yyy rE-_ it~„ -r Y t f S f ~°F 1 1 f s`-z. Ilya a k ^ a r .w 1}r o k ~f ry ~N ,j f yt A ~ i~ f r, f { 1 I, t F r ~ t< fapa, t ;t aV ~yY k 3+~ ~ I I~' 5 • 1 ~ a x F i 91 r G: t.1r ~ i ` { '1 I :iC T S _ h ~ .S 14y ~ ~ i : `'t J"" 4 ?-t FyFky { ~ t a t a -aYe , k , -a.x 1 tad,ej~5"r .Cg''i 4Ja''k xl a Op Hi ~^~~J~<`X,~~g, In. yr ~ ~ a ~ a t zry c.. x - r x`',v' '~rhy„"u f... 'd. i;Fra- q„'~ -,y "jz;1 '~'rT fm~, Fi-, :a• r- r.,•,- .y,yw.,, rc 0" '-t" . .~Yi"" ~ h m . ,'}3$ , _ R'~°vfA'fil, `X. ~ < ~y'9•'{['.,,<~~ -n' , of '.TR'^ n,(n` '`~'''Y"'•. 'iv' n~~ "`yk 5, '-+ii" ,.T" ~a a r. .P. vxe p. ,4. ~9r E: ..ae+ f ! n't';.'k' 4 ~ ~3~ .L, vi '.Is• .,P ~4:, i:M~fi'n.•.: a' a,vT'. rmF I'. 1.yAr r gpt+.lv'~"" . .f ' ,t - f' 1'4 fib' .4, .,PS ^'.?z + , :f;•. fir... ,.'!4>., , '.k • , { .'..'a `s4 4 ..~L[+ r* s. „ .b 4„r, 3 Yp q ~ r! , s L+, , `••°3 d.. - d. .F IMAM .uY ,a Y . =4' Pit G'r:. d^ d r 2" L eq'i - ,a..:,.,.s ` r., ~ > a" x. "stk.., ~ a a ~:r` -r _ xz r,k„ C' T' §v. ' d;%. ~ '~i '+x .~ti.s..,. ..1>~#. - ,d ~.--r . 1 , 1,. "trw, ' i , ~ fi+>t'o.. . r"" .9 .n „r . ~k;. ,rii,< ' a w.,; ° ,:,,.x. "a n,r „ r-" ~t~-. -fA a'' •r15; s,n". ,,t, • y. sy .,-a, »i"'bs s;'~ w,;+n'„ z ~.t «a ,r. : 3•. a.t 4, xx ~cfl y y~a:z - k ° w?. s s v z x' ?t #.h,-,3t~+:, .„;c, a. .3,,; ,,:Y"~ .•.`f< „4•; i'~,' '>k'"°' ~~t. , x :7F' c z• "T k' P-.~1, n,F Jr ~b"a`^•'*e -4. ;t-'a =,,A,.,: ^S*,?; YS 'h. ,••'s'!" ,r,~n:. p .ta ,a, ;f~ :n.'A IP 'k a i-i . >a ' 1r p , e ~Y:a, •p. r:4'r'~ , a , } '"lr~r= ~ ~ . pry 4 f•a. r .r p i;- -~`r",':pi 2 :r.~.. ,.:,r °x'•-r. F, a t a d b:-2°"ht `j„ 5 ritY h,. , l n.- r"d•' " ~ ~r r:, K;p,+. •,kNi R `i:.2 o+„'"ry ..fip. aa~ A . $ „ d', - ~s Y , ~ , ~ , ~mNa;ti. ° ~ "r `d uw'a` '~,",a'7°.a° r 5„>R ul,', c, $,#F, , ,a~ rar,:.~` ;1r#a1,,. ~ s=, ,.a:~. rP q~¢ =s~,w•aw:w-, n~•' ,~`>a ~y.`.° ;m^I~~, 'x,4.1'. t.. ~ ~ ..J~,~ k,j.' ~;tt ,d< „±~Y'~ -r. =';.S'G Y rtya K" . .4',w, ? r>ko 4~:;5~ ';i a}= 7, 2 ~ 1 G.7° , ,y..{,r -,~jF3~ vw k. J`a . uk> N , V`~--•.x tu.~tv.a, ,run, M+. ~ `^~'>"'4, . "+.Xt>>, - crpx._ .ax'k , «.k 4'K ' "S•~'°'°3? . es,'1'"-9*-. wF^F.,x. , .d`~,' €a = ,'wl. .S Po ,,p,,;W _y, . >,-.r;.•~`°~t :1rt'a1 .a_ , F a S ys aa« «~tm r,ax -:~~tw„s_ _ sr R. }W } .f.r f .}'4;,;;yss~,-p~.e ary~~rt~c.~.x,r>i . •k" ~.ytrrxi, ;s. '.y"`+ ,wxe a~-'vd'n"n a' 'a. ;"5 ~ ~ a ~~~i~°' KIM >n' c~.~& , p wr.~ f<,v 4 y ty , ~.d a hs~.. "r' S . ra}.. Y sg„~ a .`M,5 „Ti ;?'.~.,5',;;qp`; .;,A'°"~~i ;'d'"'~i. t.a$:t,.vfk .:°z+i •`'E+ti'.` ..a, t'- f6i'm '4' s~~;F 3+U F W •:k. ' 59 .rr.' {+q af~ ' ~y,"'' r, , f4, 4;t .r } p•sy~ , 'f~ 2?~>a n r~•'w`t~. "~'3Sn„L,`.Pv"$E t_d'eh", 4•t§" ISi - -a?'`n,eT~!° fi .4~~. Y/ (jar -e 4Z_1 .il . 4., Vii'- Y, ._HT .+x, Y 5.. Y . i., 'tk .`y'{i, , ° 4 w'';N'.. • Y• «-fr,4. ,<'ha' J Er, -UM1- s,^tt"f• rr~,. .,~,a._., 'aL.-,: rp- 2 1 r"~ r?a>''.,<: ,`;5~ •:dx';;u "5. - ' ON f , f~`y i. t'T""„f.'-!>:<«f _ Y'• f-r ~",-r -„"..:"r- sT'^ ^^^'~„4 ;r'f -~T^' ~*IS1I'r 6 ~^.<wvT',,: yr v i ~'.y t d'p,-,_ y 1 t v I" , i i t I~.` I . I E Ord I' n f ~ y ® ~ ~ ~ ® P r ,.~:n f i ,.is L'.k I! r aCt.fSF~, r+i` :~;s tl A ~Yr f r r o,,, a S r Von d x J ,r;, f r t y, i. f y~ } I r(`} V c h1 y 1, s ~ h,,x'I a ~ , l' !~I i I + r 'rt'~, lp: r; 11- ty{ ;tit i t Y ~~.,ii:.fi+•, r'.. E t~ , 1 a " rz {t.. o J Ir-. y l at; 9.1 i n f ,[t ~ 5. p f E a<. IC ,"JS i - 1''i' -9"'".. 6 ~''~..`4 1 ir3r ^'.r',r: .z; a . c. ~I`. '',;^-'~..,.s_.-~:~..,__ .,~1,_. F:.,._,_ A..~~ ._.'li ~i,:~,_ra*_t~[i.ti~.~.~~.,-1,i ,t~..,,.b,.-,__,:~."._ l~,_ 1,>.r~;'a~•~>,- 2yL"" h$4R ^i' R'%`Sr~.+r'7 - _ I - j I 0 r t f t - rte ^ ~ _ _ J 'i - 4d 3 L 4 - - - - d - t - t - , x e st?. r5s1 x. 2 - t - - c ~i....x{mac { - - - t , ~t_ll 1, 1-1-- = - - f $,,s* - - ' ° t 1 " , " i~, ~ , T~,~,,_'t~-~, "All'-A-1 4 Y # A f A- Y k fi J'",n`T L 't - f - - 11 - - CITY OF TIOARD - ' „ , s r CITY OF TIGAED - - , - - t _ ~ Washington County, Oregon r M NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL y r,` f r - ~ Case ivumber(s)-- - A - CHANGE - ° / -'fit y, v'x 4 t_ ~PiviENT REVIEW ~$j?~ 9~ 0014IMINOR LAND PARTITION ( LP) 93_0013 ~t t ~ ~ z5 1 Case Name(s): ALBERTSON'S INN IDUNCOMBE L UBA REMAND $y a q, a i Name of Owner: marge[y Christ ~ 11, ~ Name of Applicant: Albedrmifa I^^ dDunco 'be Address of Applicant: 17001 NE Gan Rafael City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97230 a T- + the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and 3* ~ q . 4 Address of Property: Southeast and Northeaq~ladrants of r SW Walnut Gtreet City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 1 13 Y _ , s _9 { , Tax Map & Lot No(s).:WCTM 2S1 4BB, Tax Lots 100 and 200 ° w' M ; M~ f +ti - ~>d P_~y, k ,~1 1 I _ - c - ' { < ~ Request: ➢ A request to consider an Oregon Land Use Board of Appeal (LUBA) remand for the ~ r following development approvals: x i # . 1-1 e ~ 1. Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to re-designate approximately eight acres of a ; 11.95 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on Tax Lot ~ , xr ~ al 200 and to re designate an approximately 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to ff~ , Y ' Medium-High Density Residential on Tax Lot 100. The Zone Changes accompanying the above 3t k s ,g r ,&u plan changes include a change from R-12 (PD) (Residential, 12 units per acre, Planned 3 ~ ~ { ; c Development) and R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units per acre, Planned Development) to C-C t.. # ~ (Community Commercial) and from C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 ~ , ~ U x,,; a units per acre); ~ E zs ~ M~ Nom 2. Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 40,000 square foot stand-alone z ; tenant pad and three smaller tenant pads of 1,200, 2,400 and 5,950 square feet adjoining the 3 4 -1 I s 1 1 anchor pad. The applicant also proposes two 4,000 square foot stand-alone tenant pads; and a - ' 4 I r - ~ ~ ,~--,-*R~~-R,'-,'Px - ~ ~ A,11___ 1, I _'._"_1 3. Minor Land Partition approval to divide the 11.95 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately / t 11 eight acres and 3.95 acres each. ` u- , ' The October 20, 1995 LUBA remand required City Council to receive and make additional findings on the +i rf iY, following issues: F - I s { r 1. Transportation Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy (TCP) 8.1.3 (f)-(h) and 8.4.1 2. Air/Water Quality: LCDC Goal 6 ^ n 3. Air Quality Impact: TCP Policy 4.1.1' ` 4. Water Quality Compliance: TCP Policy 4.2.1 t s - 1 4 M1S - ~'Y 2, , j 5. Commercial Compatibility: TCP Policy 5.4 r r 3 1 6. Buffering: TCP Policy 6.6.1 7. Storm Drainage Facilities Feasibility: TCP Policy 7.1.2 } = 6. Design CIIICIIe: lVinisLiiisiy Development t vw_'c 1861055 [ S r - r a,'..' 7 -11, i,Mt-z, 1 { £ - NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL CPA 93-0009/ZON 93-0003/SDDR 93-004/MLP 93-0013 ' r _ - 1 E page 1 of 2 ALBERTSON'S/DUNCOMBE LUBA REMAND - s, a', E - q 0 °1 k -'r - - r z - - - " i F i 4 4 - i A° t - r Y S < 1 1 f i 4 a f 4j Y i$ x i f I ~ y - - ; . - - - i - - Emma _1_1 _ - - 5.-._ $ f 4=- - ,,,~-,,,,,~.,~--i~'e-,..-~~;~-,~,~~,.~~'.,,~-,:~',, - ~ - f., - - - , - - - , ~ - ~7- t,~_.,,~%~ ~ ~~,~,,I~~ ;i-7_t_z 2, 4it~ * R E P , _1 ~",Z~,' ~ - - , . - _ - ; ~141 M s std' IFS aii s jr 461 , x r x e t , ? x ffi r si § ~ rr} > s ya e tl £ - 1,1V ' Zone: The existing Neighborhood Commercial zone permits a range of convenience goods and services F F w" t w- -f t : which are purchased at least weekly. Typical uses would include convenience sales and personal Y.£, , 4y; , ".,3k>_, services, children's day care, financial, insurance and real estate services, food and beverage t; i~ , R' retail sales, etc. Neighborhood Commercial centers have a 5,000 square foot lot minimum. x '~s f ~~,£«i :K ti ' The proposed Community Commercial zone permits a range of convenience goods and services ~111 ~ 1 - iix~A 'At s °.f dq -ii` °y' ?"M;~ ; which are designed to serve the regular needs of residents of nearby residential neighborhoods. : ~ 1, . °t a Community Commercial centers typically range in size from a minimum of two acres to eight -tear < } acres. In terms of building square footage, these centers range from 30,000 to 100,000 square H erG ® t'E , MW I -1_ . feet. ' a r§ Flu ,It x r t The existing R-25 (PD) zone permits a range of single-family attached, low and medium rise ~ . I s I 1,11, 1, ` * 9 multiple family residential units, for medium-high residential development. The R-25 zone permits s , 3 ligMm . residential densities up to 25 units per acre. The Planned Development zoning district overlay is + yi h ` qx , 14 i designed to encourage properties to be developed as a single unit in terms of design, access, etc. ~ K , Ii. _ ' - 1 ~ ax z ` 3 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goal 6; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, -6D F` - - ` ~ `4" j 4.2.1, 5.4, 6.6.1, 7.1.2 and 8.1.3 (f)-(h) and 8.4.1; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32 and ~ 18.61.055. -,s yea` .k°nt 3 Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as requested Approval with conditions 13 Denial f. F t F - Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: - ~ -y it ~ F - 4 i 0 Owners of record within the required distance ©Affected governmental agencies x ~ k © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ©The applicant and owner(s) s ?_0 ] il~ 11, z,- - x0 x*'cxy Irv _ k Final Decision:{~' ' i 11 W , THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ONS1/-j ,1996 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON 41~/q , 1996. w s F The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard <x* 1-_ : y 4 . 9 T°` Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. „may . i , r t r~rv~ c Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board ; f- - r _ a fl ; of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. $ ,fr s - I'll + ,1- G 111- -w_ _ , y I4 ~ 1 f x r j Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. I -1 S R s - y + mP& 1 I t _ J t a - } to `S qr~ 9Sy7 ( ~ _ ~ , 11 l rs, s r I °r F - r r k , } k e2 , , rr r a ( l r r 5 3 - I s e - ~ ~~rxy ~ r - i- it }F, a- f- .S ~r sk°a f 14 J L a c {rx,, x "4'- NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL CPA 93.000920N 93`0003/SODR 93-004/MLP 93-0013 ~i h 2,_, +y x page 2 02 ALBERTSON'SIDUNCOMBE LUBA REMAND 1 e . # x- - z e - t a yr` . p x z h n w .S` F u '~i ly : 'a ,R ,"r^+.rr f r~~-- _ r"'.^. _ - ';v '-65 _ r d 7~F x aid' M _ ,f riY' y, - T 12 . ..,r ~ I .7Y '4 s' c -3~r'S, f r j r6 6 - - - - r - "s fra F`-z - - -.x` -f Ff N'o'r+d x's7 f'a'x _ _ i _ _ ' .S Y s y, r 3 _ $ s a w 'x ,1 ~4 / =LL - JI 1 I Y '7 Y~ 7 s K Y IL li, V_. s IT t I ~ 1. W~m " - - 4~, . n. nm!dfilii i , _ q 'Kx . k- a. 1. .a~ , _f } -r 'r ' ati ~ Is , .~-mss' -j~ y r~ - g s a• _ ° . iM v" '.z. sr, 2 b y ~2i - 0 xr , a,; k s '1ti .~r _ .x`s e =r .ty~.~c' a Y~ ~ `'S- S ` 11 - ' - i i w - r rat-<.- s 'wv:`.✓ rs :z { rkyt - - - t r fr x :?.j.x^ 3 s"[' vsi rz , z 42 z ' s r s 7 3 r WxE " ' `s 1 -rt , _.9 ,v. t :x. ....w'`'- r 5a l''' cam" i ` x s~ d' i - usvrar.:r m..- ,.~,a..e.-i`~::'s; z~^r.. - M . i .p ~ - , R; a ~ t t a 1 r - , ~ t. - { a. ,r'r - - p ~`:3~ c [es -r `s'ty k ~s EXHIBIT A - A / 1. R CITY OF TIGARD CITY COUNCIL 4 ~ s t.N # ' , , S5 { f k, FINAL ORDER 1 x r z z> 11 -z A FINAL. ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITH REGARD TO ~ 11. ° -s E ~ T : A REMAND OF AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, T -z ZONE CHANGE, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND MINOR LAND PARTITION {qb, l ,y x' zs APPLICATIONS REQUESTED BY ALBERTSON'S, INC. - A- ~ 14 J zt , ,Ti- e Tigard City Council reviewed the application below at a public hearing on April 23, 1996. x s * r The City Council approves the request. The Council has based its decision on the facts, findings ~,1 ~ , , r and conclusions noted below. 11 , s. u - A. FACTS: r , > h T r s 1. General information hk, t Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 93-0009 - ' Zone Change ZON 93-0003 ` f ` - Site Development Review SDR 93-0014 I r l - - ~ k ~ , Minor Land Partition MLP 93-0013 d h Ft A request for the following development approvals: c rte" mot: r fi _ k -tY~ t (1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change to redesignate eight acres of a 11.95 acre ; ~~4"g- '4~ o ~ " F f parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on Tax Lot 0 , n } r „ 200 and to redesignate a 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium-~" ' 1 11 I t x~ t r, High Density Residential on Tax Lot 100. Proposed zone changes accompanying the ; w~ z above plan changes includes request for a zone change from R-12 (PD) and R-25 (PD) - , s 1` P r (Residential, 25 units/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (Community Commercial) and I ~ . 11: r 1- I 111 4 " C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre); ~2~ 1- ,r 15 f, s r (2) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 40,000 square foot e,; 12-1 ~ - f Albertson's Grocery Store and three smaller tenant pads of 5,950; 2,400 and 1,200 square j- 1W ` z ' feet. The applicant has also proposed two 4,000 square foal retail pads. - 'tea E (3) Minor Land Partition approval to divide an 11.95 acre parcel into two parcels of 7 sue', . approximately eight acres and 3.95 acres each. ? j r ~ a "M, t~ ir_ zt f t Applicant: Albertson's, Inc. (Don Duncombe) _ a % C ~ ,U_ „t:'I`'-_ 17001 NE San Rafael : ~ t `yet E : Lw6S "I -1 Portland, OR 97230 5, ` I 3~: - r r €r'~0 ~ 1?? ~t N 2 }--$.s1,4..~v,y u. aFPns .wL"+L _ G 3S]dCxe"' ' S tf FINAL REMAND ORDER -CPA 93-091ZON 93-031SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 1 - 17~ r 9,A.z.rt ' . a. 9rt~Y1s3~ W.,,.. ..u- Im."'^ le "'grq~,'sr fi, - CL .1 Try •=t.3 . " a. - { C S§`F - '4+ s g- r - ~ - e a'"` r,, 1, x - 2, W - ~ - T , , .p, - , , ~ ILI- " - , , - Y!i tf~..~- e - g k r is "N 4 - a n t ' s `V, -0s - t L ~e rt .2d - - p J '4 4 _ 'S Z Y'^ § h vi 1, h 9 j 7 , E ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I 1__ - . i - N - t - V` - t T-_k' , - . _ : - _ - I 1, x t; X14Tz, ~ , ~~r?'a'~° cg in s' -x - _ s # Y~ .irk' ?``'''4a r, - _ _ 3 _ Z r' r T ~..it+7Y3'ry ',4't- 2 i• _ - Cd .h x a;".-t - .sj.' 3T _ vk'-',~ ~.s Cs3 ' .,Y~ s ,',~Y, I - qrl! . a - w s ip ~ Fa y , 5 : r" . t ~ ?fib Agent: John W. Shonkwiler, P.C. i - m r $ E if N ~ ;,t__f Attorney at Law ~I Y-~ c°I-, L' ` 'I^ > ~-1'f`;`'` , ,YN , 13425 SW 72nd Ave. - ~ , 1 Tigard, OR 97223 t` _ x a' Y, VV Owner: Margery Christ, et al. Route 1, Box 792 ° z3 ' a Beaverton, OR 97007 ~ ; 4 ~ : { .rte,, a fir;- {mss,"- , _ -t 'fir " - A; € 'VR ,y, , r Location: Southeast and northeast quadrants of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road s ;,Y t 'r `k and SW Walnut Street. (WCTM 2S1, 4BB, Tax Lots 100 and 200). 6_ A SV i'' X - Y M , :4 ^i" Applicable Review Criteria: - V~ s . j (1) Generally: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14; Comprehensive £ ~4~~ a ~ ~ n - s Plan Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 6.1.1, 6.4.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, l f - ~ a , ` -1 ,i , .-a_?X: 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 8.4.1, 9.1.3, 12.1.1, 12.2, and 12.2.1 and 12.2.4; and a'., , 77 .-r:,* ^ r '."5 s':,tic;'3?`i~'o`~T;"{i .T''.~Gt.=n _ a: h P... r . t ; c } _ Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, 18.56, 18.60, 18.61, 18.98, L`;;~~, der r - 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.130, 18.162, and 18.164. _"j, x _ 1 h } (2) On Remand: Statewide Planning Goal 6; Comprehensive Plan Policies 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 4 w 1 . ~r r w 5.4, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 8.1.3 (f)-(h), 8.4.1; and Community Development Code Chapter !M, ¢ } Yd 18.61.055. - i z } t ' 1 x F 2. Rackeround Information~~ ``w ° LL An area that included the subject property was annexed to City of Tigard on June 12, 1 F _ - u 1 1983. In August 1983, the City approved a variety of plan and zone designations for the - 11 7 s area, including Medium-High Density Residential (R-20, now R-25 zone), Medium S, 11 -il A I"- Li'V ~t y i 1' ,,£T Density Residential (R-12 zone), and Neighborhood Commercial (C-N zone). ra _ t x y a ~ t The City subsequently approved the relocation of the C-N designation in a number of " - s sR~ r A--r.!- ; - locations in the vicinity between 1983 and 1986 (Case files CPA 18-83/AC 14-83, CPA ~ . , rV, I . x,41 > 4-85/ZC 4-85, CPA 1-86/ZC 3-86). The current C-N designation is located on Tax Lot , 11- r ~4 s t r € ''md , , 100. In CPA 1-86 and ZC 3-86 the City Council ordered that the configuration of the C- ; 11 0 - fir„ e N N designation would be modified to conform to the final alignment of Murray Boulevard. Y 4~ K - Subsequently, Walnut Street was constructed as part of the projected Murray Boulevard 4, a3 11 , ' alignment, thereby finalizing Tar Lot 100. The City Council confirms that the ~~~a Ir ~ ` - configuration of the former C-N designation on Tax Lot 100 is now 6.93 acres to conform 1r; ; , ` . ; € with the final alignment affecting that parcel. A summary of past City actions pertaining r p s , to the commitments to the size and location of the N-C designation is presented in the ~ - - ~ ±5 a- xy w staff report for an earlier Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposed by Albertson's for I'll -1, f ~ - this property (Case CPA 91-0003/ZCA 91-0006). r~ - g r j „3a s 7 J 1, s ;i a - - e'^~~ r o, t FINAL REMAND ORDER -CPA 93-091ZON 93.03/SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 2 Wy ~i _z _ ; ze t u < z i01t i y E { r' r- r 'N - _ s x- t i- - - ~~t~art 4r P r d- t - u 4S r ~ 3s fi* t a em`N~..✓.4. i i r z 1 . t , - , - . ~ , , .1 ~ , . ~ " _ _ " " - ~ , , - , , - d ,~7~`e~a7 , . I ~ :~I ' - = z, t - F ter t £ i - - af+ F his e {r^'.t S - : f' ^t'7{ Y -.h, t' s %LV,a ti - a., - - _ ,`~'~l ~At 2 r .i- - "l 1,:1 - s E pia r Y i 'zi z Y> { a s.,. k 7 '`„z' ate'"y Z'' - - S' M I I - - ~ " A ~ . - t~~ 41-.1 - - n 111, -2'~' 3' x 4 siY~ - - s `~h~ •>?,;.-tea w - i - - - z , z , - _t - ,-~i,.~-,~ .1 " : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , T zr~ , c ` a ty '1 - S 5~"~ x s t 1 4 yS a.4 S } - y i3b.s~x u.. - w-re_ , DMa_xre.aJsa~.+. ".mow -._.-..v......-,.....w._....w....a...,.w+n.,.-._..-.-++«Y 5RFF ,i r- - i 7 k t t t-{ v,- - 0 *:2 .fPZp S - q~~.~+ 4 3 ~ A number of single family and multi-family residential developments have been proposed i t tp ; iiw- =.;Ki ,-',3=f - for all or a portion of the subject property between 1986 and 1990 (Case Files SDR 4-86, ffi `a,'' `'-5 R Y S 87-04N 87-04, S 87-07,SUB 90-04/ZON 90-04/ VAR 90-08). Development has i t j ` recently occurred following the approval of Castle Hill Subdivision. t:. ~ - a ; ~ In 1991, Albertson's applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change ; ! (CPA 91-0003/ZCA 91-0006) to establish an 8 acre Commercial General (C-G) site on $N-~~~ - 4 Tax Lot 200. The request also involved the redesignation of the existing C-N site on Tax z V . - CM t Lot 100 to Medium-nigh :.csiden*.ia! (R-2_5)- A final decision by the City Council was ; *`5 t ` stayed at the request of the applicant. - ,~.,s r Q 3~°~rt. ~ f ''C'~ " Following this application, the City considered including a new Community Commercial r, ' a' , x, 1 zoning designation as part of the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development ; - s ~ 9 Code. After lengthy review, the City adopted the Community Commercial designation in , ` December 1992. r ' }v r . ~ Y } f On November 15, 1993 the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council r > s~ , A,,! ~~T,i, _t- _ approve the application with the inclusion of conditions for an automobile access -;g , ; .k k% f ; driveway to SW Northview Drive, a pedestrian staircase to SW Northview Drive, - _ x conceptual building design details which are consistent with the grocery store design, the k , Planning Commission also recommended that an access plan for the 3.95 acre parcel '4$t F y south of the site and an improved interior parking lot pedestrian pathway system. fir`s. , : " a r_, e s~ y 1 ~ v?~ On January 25, 1994 the City Council remanded the application back to the Planning It'N~ ~ I -1 f Commission due to concerns related to property owner notification, the findings within : , I 1CP N, T I L the staff report and the appropriateness of proposed development within the Community gr~ i a a Commercial Zoning District. ` 3 r11 f ~-tW , osal as a result of n- i per' - Subsequently, the applicant made the following revisions to the ProP concerns raised at neighborhood meetings and issues raised by the City Council at the 'a ~ L, , January 25, 1994 Public Hearing: £ -4 ` (1) The proposed commercial uses on the pads opposite to the Albertson's pad have been - ~ { s x modified. The gas station and Shari's uses have been eliminated as prospective tenants. t r t j The pads are shown as 4, 000 square foot retail sites. " . t - - ,t j' (2) A new brick wall has been proposed along portions of the proposed 8 acre parcel's s - . j , 11 a4 property frontage on SW Northview Drive. r . (3) The staircase entrance from SW Northview Drive has been modified to include a ~ series of 90 degree turns to obscure the staircase entrance. r~g ; r (4) The applicant has agreed not to develop the site with tenants which would have 24- k I hour commercial operations due to potential impacts to adjoining residential areas. L t ~ (5) The applicant revised the site plan to provide a separate staircase from SW Northview t I Drive to the grocery store building and separated pedestrian pathways for internal f- r ° Q - ' ; V ' circulation between all buildings and through the center of the parking area. s d - !1 • 1 ` " FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-09/ZON 93-03%SDR 93.14 - ALBERTSON'S - 3 i ` s. r u - r gx [ r, n v r,„, a 3 } $ f a h i.x _ Z 'f - }a- T, 2t t-'ij F 6} f d r~ , t t R - - 1' i E 1 H( t+....~ S ~ b C..'S'r .i'Ya,~ i4 t -,d 1 y Tf - f . t" YT -J 'y - ry J__ i i i J y e t d 1 - - -f- ; '1 fJ '4 Pr 7~ t~~E7tir 4 - -ql 4 4 a s MW . _ - -,rte - f 1 r ."~q - - , x _ ,c', T z ry ,z' - - r ar k a y Y - y~ ~e * e + -jx r ~5 a its , k r 'S I °`~~1'y,, {4-. . ,;..:'riat - 1 _ .may FC c ,,.'Y..'z z~'Y Y # a 2 - , _ -~y~..,~- 4 Y x-~, 3,' \ a. x-si .t's".rtx~.,,,' St's i - w - - - - . - rv x &A ~ Aj1*W3°K%_W ,C rw.r. - ri'"~N~ s.-S g~ h'd~ 1,;, ' ! 4 ,I -dirt - , 11 '~`,7 " x-4. ~ ~ - r 1 s S F ~s 3 N iYt~, ..~~,y (6) The site has been posted with a sign showing the proposed site development plan for , t the shopping center. "?p q Y 15,. ~ f (7) The applicant has also discussed transferring ownership of the multi-family area south y„' zi~ PI, - ~ ~ h of the Albertson's site to the Castle Hill Neighborhood Association. 1 -t~ ~ ~ ' - = (8) The applicant has provided a history of the application, a synopsis of the changes - l - 1- x - , which have been made to the plan, a security lighting plan, a noise study; and conceptual' ~j 1 plans for Albertson's store, the site plan, the wall proposed along SW Northview Drive. tti ~st On November 7, 1994 the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council ' approved the application without the inclusion of conditions for an automobile access ">4I I, _ , driveway to SW Northview Drive. A portion of the Commission felt that the Council 4` - , ; , 11 t` r *i k " " should consider provision of a one-way driveway wiueh allows ingress but not egress R 4{ ' ` t rt gr, onto SW Northview Drive. Commission felt that the improved interior parking lot , , A, - t 1, ; pedestrian pathway system was sufficient as proposed. - 3 * " xs Nr t n-t°'x ~ i 3v x k s H rtr 7 lv, r:~, * _.,Y" `'j The City Council reviewed the application, as modified, on December 13, 1994 and 3 rk~ _ ,tin approved the application, with conditions, on December 27, 1994. An appeal of the City `,x -x _ , Council's decision was subsequently filed with the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). =3,k,!;>>:., .i:,... r: On October 20, 1995, LUBA filed a Final Opinion and Order (Order) remanding the 1 5 x s r 1 " - . decision to the City. The LUBA remand sustained eight assignments or sub-assignments , a L'_' r - of error relating to the following: y" ~ 4-7 1g, . 1. Transportation: Tigard Comprehensive Plan (TCP) Policy 8.13 (f)-(h) and 8.4.1. , LUBA Opinion at 14. ~ ,m' ' ,i '`s 4a 2. Air/Water Quality: LCDC Goal 6. LUBA Opinion at 14-16. s, _ ~ i I- i 3. Air Quality Impacts: TCP Policy 4.1.1. LUBA Opinion at 16-17 ~ ~ TI, , s - J 4. Water Quality Compliance: TCP Policy 4.2.1. LUBA Opinion at 17. ~ a ; ~y p - 5. Commercial Compatibility: TCP Policy 5.4. LUBA Opinion at 20-22. Al ~ ,g a j 6. Buffering: TCP Policy 6.6.1. LUBA Opinion at 24-28. , s- l) s *~g 4 iF 7. Storm Drainage Facilities Feasibility: TCP Policy 7.1.2. LUBA Opinion at 28-29. j3 , ' 4 b C rr M1 - , 8. Design Criteria: CDC 18.61.055. LUBA Opinion at 31-33. VI { x .1111 } q 3. Vicinity Information _ hl a" xL a Single family residential development in the Castle Hill Subdivision lies to the east and 3 g E r as " south. To the northeast is the Cotswald Subdivision which is of a similar character and 3 1 density. A day school is on the west side of SW Scholls Ferry Road. A few large lot 'ZI _ , 3 l~. t F t } i. 'r single family residences also exist to the north, south and west of the subject area. A ~ ` ty ' FINAL REMAND ORDER -CPA 93-091ZQN 93-03/SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 4 -Y r ~2 - [ F V f ?J r fir,.7 - ~ ^-r";r vw :s`;i- .n„ -reaa+~ss»*- _ a-T 'sra " Af s, ; - 3`i N' ix x.. .3 , f - r~y a-$ - rr Pf T R `fi t T' 'J - - J Lx i hf ,k F H"`y u., S,t L`(}Y -s'-G Yy Ip Yep - 7Q W 4a, f -s - r , 3 ,o- _-i ~xr "T~ M zc 4 r E t y y, _ -,,r K o e .q - _ - - I-. , ti L-Z sue....-_ , F ~r 'ax "t - ,4-k T~g-r lz.'~,,~~`-, ,t,,__:, , , , - , ~ - , , , , " Tj T~ x YT.=. srw' fi _ a _ ak [ Ysq f,5- - - „~,a - ^;r"3'3.>tig t+' mss +r - 7 i. g' y' t14-e,M- ~,~',y mra _ _ _m'~ £ h y . 2 _ z_ emu., - - ~ ' 6 x *x srs I ; t `av>ff' x,.a.., ~.z....~.,:..~t..~.,: ,..may...- ' z w4..s °S s ,ft V~f quarry operated b Moms Brothers Inc. is located to the southwest ' Y , across SW Scholls ,-r - - I 11 i m ^ ' _ Ferry Road. c" ? - kp~ . nth a~~ k 9 ~ ~ ~kia R-25(PD) zoning surrounds the parcel currently designated C-N. The area south of the I ! ' " c a-m_ y - proposed C-C designation is zoned R-12 (PD) and R-25(PD). The area across SW , ' v x Scholls Ferry Road from this area is zoned by the City of Beaverton as R-2 (multi-family, ~?4 r Q 1 2,000 square feet lot area/unit). The average allowable density within a 1/2 mile radius of s the site is approximately 15 units per acre. ~ u J.-i1 Fad ~ , t 3S 1,, " Other commercial sites within the general vicinity of the proposal include: Murray Hill ~f, „a ~ _ i7i t" ' Shopping Center located approximately 3/4 mile north on Murray Boulevard; Greenway , ~ " FE ? Town Center Shopping Center located approximately I% mile east on Scholls Ferry ~P,'- -F " Road; Washington Souare located approximately 2%x miles east; several commercial t - centers along Pacific Highway, including the Tigard Central Business District, located T T-,~T1 ~,iL~,~E.,,,.~~,;~~',~'Q~-,-'.-5 L_.;*-,,~-,,,,~~,] ~ _ approximately two or more miles to the southeast. E $ ' ffi ~ $ _ ~r ar n, i 4. Site Information } IM " <T } - There are two ' ~ . properties involved in this application. Tax Lot 100 is 6.93 acre ' a" 1 s in size, ty>.:_. zoned C-N, and located on the northeast quarter of SW Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. This parcel is a vacant, grassy field with a relatively moderate grade. _ ' ,,'''mr- 11 -34,_ Y Y ~ : $ Tax Lot 200 is 11.95 acres in size, zoned R-12 (PD) and R-25(PD), and located on the t r - . ~ 3 a - southeast quarter of SW Scholls Road and Walnut Street. This property is also vacant, a 3} _t'g grassy field, but it slopes significantly downward away from the Castle Hill Subdivision { to Scholls Ferry Road. G h3 3 n t'st~s. XS t -L 1 5. Proposal Description , µ - E The applicant has submitted a packet of materials which relate to the issues remanded by i ~ E ~ty " LUBA. The materials include studies related to transportation/traffic, and engineering , aN.r v s analysis/designs for treatment and compliance with regulations for "discharges" ~~~g ,t cap associated with the proposed development. g, { 4w + - The application includes the following four separate components: c : m ;A . y,~ J a. CPA 93-0009/ZCA 93-0003 z 5#'1i-s ` I N X ? r u 4 r _ r A proposed change of the C-N designation on Tax Lot 100 to R-25, and change the R-12 rte } t tt R' 4i.Q '3 € f R N.> I . § (PD) and R-25(PD) designation for 8 acres of Tax Lot 200 to C-C, leaving the remaining i s 11 , i a lr }~3 A - v land use designations on the property as they are (see Applicant's Statement Exhibit } r 7{LIII). This change is proposed to be consistent with the requirements associated with -5; d the City's C-C designation and the obligations of the City to maintain an adequate {f k Ir inventory of multi-family residential plan. , s t ; -a v 1 j >ar t ss- a,-r ` -a tw - ' a n t a-h - s1 FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93.09/ZON 93.03'SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 5 y - P" . _ w ? --4 ~ x 4 f -r _ i' , - .r ram;. ~ ~ ^"-Z ,ase•m. r7 Y ' r a' 3, w ea s,rt dye c X - 3 - _ - I _ i -i 'Y 11 d f A t x- r r s psi ..,F 3 ? { &k £x r ar y `P e v} t - a mot, ..C a ~K Z ~a ` [ s fi w t s s.,' r is y t o a.~` -r { H,- 1 __y _ - - I ~L nib `F.'^T+ - - t . , _ - - ' - - - - t - - - - . i 3 - ~ , . - , N k N ~ ~ m 4 - .~V ~ ~ 1, , - ~ ~ - , - - - , , ~-,a, , " ~e .,d- -.s e-~ -s xr . 5. a ~ s t z M .-v. _ +1' e b. SDR 93-0014 ~ X11, ~ ' ''tx < r The applicant proposes to develop a shopping center with a total of 57,550 square feet of~ r 5~ L~-~' I' floor space. This space includes a 40,000 square foot grocery store, 9,550 square feet of pp = ms's t . additional commercial space adjacent to the grocery store and two separate pad sites - totaling 8,000 square feet (see Applicant's Statement, Exhibit XI III). The applicant has - n ti# ' ' provided preliminary site, grading, utility, and landscaping plans. Conceptual building a ~r s- elevations providing detail of proposed design features for the Albertson's and a model E,s 11 I N. - I, I a~ for future structures have also been provided.' - - f r Y - -1- I- s , - A 40,000 square foot Albertson's Grocery Store and 9,550 square of commercial space f k~ > r 11 . 1 are proposed for the southern portion of the site. A truck access and loading area is 1% s ~ ~ ? n N "I . Pi Uf16JCd along iI1C South t1 side of the iiiiiuilts. &.,e avuutctta auu c'JtctTi pVluviS of ~ 3 site are proposed to be graded extensively and the south side of the main building would tP;, #f h - "1 have a floor elevation that ranges from 8 to 24 feet below the existing grade. ~Z ~ "a,'R- *I rN , p A freestanding tenant pad site is proposed towards the southeast quarter of SW Scholls £ - 4a~- + . P h Ferry Road and SW Walnut Street, a second freestanding pad is intended for the fy7-- ~ r~ ' ' southwest comer of SW Walnut Street and SW Northview Drive. The applicant has k , ' wr ~ z revised the application to indicate both pads are intended to be developed with retail uses. fsd ~ ' F ' w g£ t t The applicant has withdrawn a conditional use permit portion of this application. as e ~s~_.. s~ Y -r The applicant has not submitted development plans for approval on any of the residential a' zJ 3z.+ ` 7 areas on the subject properties. Conceptual development plans for the residential area has ~ ~~gX -s 'r rx been previously entered into the record. , ~ , r In addition to the specific uses shown on a site plan and referred to in the Applicant's r * NA~~~ statement, approval of other uses is requested. This is because all tenants of the center' r t have not been committed. It is also expected that tenants will change over time. The :e-' , p. 1 i , ,1 additional uses which may be located at the site and are permitted in the C-C zone for ` ; 1 which the applicant requests approval are:f 1 Animal sales and services; - - - 1 ` ~ y ~t 1 Consumer repair services; nr r - t ~ Convenience sales and personal services, zf 3 Children's day care; t',,v ' r 4 x Eating and drinking facilities; ' F s F General retail sales (less than 10,000 square feet); , riy r' w General offices (medical, dental, financial, insurance, real estate, professional and {#y 3 ' ,t , administrative services}; and - - i , Indoor participant sports and recreation. a 2 ~ ` , r Fx n} n Three driveways are proposed on 5W Scholls Ferry Road and one driveway is shown on s, , ~ p _ SW Walnut Street. Internal sidewalks are shown immediately adjacent to the commercial s _ 3 P`Yk # Y r} ~ F,„ rfi q F e, FINAL REMAND ORDER -CPA 93-09/ZON 93-03/SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S .6 M i ; . 11 { r j y by 4 - } ~'f f{~ M dtYV r l t _ ro , - ~ ~ , ,,,~,J:,,,--,-,,~ , , ~ ~ ~V,~~ , ? -.2", - . , - . N Ste' F-r - - c - i - a h x'" SaP`'S,' r :4 , n 1 47 - ,T',~ 3 '-.tun 4 tx 1 s - d 5 ' f :I y r` 'S 3' - J 'y _ 4 3 T". 'Y 3 w~ - 1 3 C r Ej t. d - - - Y ~ R - , - , ; ~ - . M _ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ 1, - - ' - I - 1 - a l . I ^v ^5 ' . - - , ,~,~~Iic - .11 , " ~ ~7 17-1 -,'ry~, , ' , c .r S - - F - -v #'R m - 1 ~`'i _ _ d L-...1..~•.zi 4-'tbte..Eis-l z~c - i' fir.: tt z st - ~a -'~~'r36 i - t-- x ` Y r, 'k '-xa;v*, eta-$+_.h.., tea a.Y' t,w 1, i - - qty ~ t,Y r - F~ Yt l_ H wr..erL~__ M_-.: y,~~ r - ~~s5, - - -L F X`, df ~t M ' ~ hex+4 buildings. Sidewalks link the two pad sites with the public sidewalks on the perimeter of { i ; s t` the project, a sidewalk and staircase connections are proposed between the grocery store r4: kn - z and SW Nordtview Drive, and sidewalks are permitted through the parking area to the ( f z main building- tM e , ' 11 PP-1 - ~ `f t-~ c. MLP 93-0013 s s ' 11 I .F 4 u ~ zr ,A J. } t ' ) ~ w~ iqqNt 1- -11 111111~_- The applicant wishes to create a separate 8 acre parcel for the shopping center. The other , ~r ' 3.95 acre parcel is to retain its existing designation for future residential development. ter,, ~ .11 11 fa x a xv v I 6.APency and Neighborhood Comments s ~r k q-".L- The applicable agency and neighborhood comments have been received and included in ,Y aaaaa the record for consideration. 4 33 i c - Ag I- - - w _ " 7. Remand H=f= , ~ r 6 , The remand hearing on the application was limited to the assignments and sub- ^<l€ . ~ 11 - assignments of error sustained and requiring remand b LUBA's Order. This limitation 1, K. , , ;_g, n " _ wasincluded in the public notice for the remand hearing. _ ~s , 0-~ I y 11 f r` Y .c _K~"-yS ~ 0 e ~c~rR 3 4~ f`3 B. FINDINGS: - - I - - 3r - crs e ^*"c 3_33„4 a w# L F 1. Transportation: Tigard Comprehensive Plan (TCP) Policy 8.13 (f)-(h) and 8.4.1. U ' ~tl LUBA Opinion at 14. s ' f.~ q~?. , _ - , t TCP Policy 8.13 (f) provides that "The City shall require as a precondition to ~@ - ~ t r development approval that: Transit stops, bus turnout lanes and shelters be provided when the a . ~ k F t M proposed use (is) of a type which generates transit ridership." z .111 3 _ r ~ i i7 , f n y fAe 5 The subject property and the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street r ass E t~ b are not currently served by transit ridership. Nor is the site in close enough proximately to be - (e -q'' served by transit ridership. The property is approximately I/2 mile from the nearest Tri-Met k , x , , - - j route. The policy phrase "the proposed use of a type which generates transit ridership" is Y L_' N j` ti $ _ interpreted to mean that it is a use which transit ridership facilities, such as Tri-Met bus routes, , x , r are already available to serve the site, and thereby necessitating the need for on-site I ~ mr, ~P. qz,,, rJ improvements, such as transit stops, bus tumout lanes, etc. Therefore, TCP Policy 8.1.3 (f) does ` ~ r t , -11- 11 - 11 - 11 a i~ not require the Albertson's application to provide transit stops, bus turnout lanes, or bus shelters , ' ,JI x 11A - 5, - 4 n associated with the site because transit ridership facilities are not currently available, nor GR w _ ry ; expected in the reasonably near future, to serve this site. The Applicant's statement, traffic study -i i-F - y . . k (Kittleson Report dated February 16. 1996) and Tri-Met's evaluation letter supports these F > )I 3 t t E . ~ n.- r.,x..j-,"'. - sMa r z " ~ - - , determinations. This policy is satisfied. t"`' tt 11 - " A k y ~~9 - *~sr 1 t t° ' " f sx ? i r FINAL REMAND ORDER -CPA 93-091ZON 93-03/SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 7 M - - ca t"av"-S. rts^' - J. ';vl ,o:. r~ 'w' - TM- c s P 7L - - d v x' ? qz ZHi' Fr -4 r - - - r - t ffi r r . ~ .h'u } r 3 i'N - P t - t t _ - eta f t ,5(' * - y L z j _ ~ e - - 3 - iI , y dye L 32- Lk S ~ , , 4 ? t `A S M 'te'a` .ysa ~r t y S s - i, K i h 1 . 11 - € .n-? r ~ _ 1 _ - i - , - , F' - - T 11 _-1 , L_ z ..1 s,- ter: _-~.V -777 D' . - - - . J- r t - a F - - - - - -1 q ~y - - "i - - ~M-a -5g,W-_-Q--P-,- ~ _-_2 - - ~ ~ , , - , ~ , - : -`I - - ~ , ~ , : ~ . - ~ 7-, ~ -,-,~~,-.*.--~.,'~vf,-,--.',-~-,i~~. , _7 7 - fl M~ -+-SY-Psu _ - 4 - ;y' 'i Y - _ - "t -t`a - - - c P - - y # - r - , r f"' z a. a.aen r•..., e.,.. r: .,«a,~........,.,,...,w....~ w,r~~ :.haA«^~~.-~-.r.;...__ . __.~_.u...-~,......._,._~~._...,_ _~~_.-oc..., i i a _ 11 4 YT { - 'I r However, SW Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street are logical routes for future f Wy Y' .;e expansion as the demand for bus services increases. The Albertson's application includes t ~ ~~,.,3 ~p5 3g' - - k~ provision for future placement of bus turnout lanes, bus stop and/or shelter near the "mini-park" j n, F at the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. A traffic study conducted by €t ~ Kittleson & Associates, Inc., transportation planners and traffic engineers, determined that the j r :1. F~ ' , 4- _ future provision of these transit requirements are "feasible" due to the adequacy of the site _ t development plan. Although not currently required by the policy, the applicant has agreed to f, a - ` condition approval upon providing the area near the "mini-park" to accommodate such transit 1 - _ stop, bus turnout lanes and shelters as required for future needs. Any potential application of . ~ x ~ , 1 the policy is satisfied. I ; k t k ~I— r $'-s , Ji - k k § - , ,i s. a 4 TCP Policy 8.1.3 (g) provides "The City shall require as a precondition to development , S,; - t ' approval that: Parking spaces be set aside and marked for cars operated by disabled persons and _ +a ~ r that the spaces be located as close as possible to the entrance designed for disabled persons:' , -x ;c -c i ' x _ T- proposed development pr^: •ideS h_ndirannrrj parking cparrc in rmmnlin a„ith 0i:e f i --'r~ =x`aV z r- _ x , . '_rr'_ _ - r-._ 'T"°~' - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, and these parking spaces are located in = - close proximity to the access points for the proposed grocery store, attached shop aces, and the ' f "v, Via; ~ a.._. 'c two outlying commercial buildings. This determination is supported by the Kittleson Report ~ k 7 (Exhibit D-3). The site development plan identifies the handicap parking locations. Policy 8.1.3{ x (g) will be satisfied with the condition of approval pertaining to re-locating two handicapped r r k~ ' spaces and provision for additional spaces within the existing ' ; - ,a ' parking parking lot plan area for all a SF,- ; - other building sites throughout shopping center. The Applicant has provided a traffic reP g ort an d a , '~z' m t_ site plan that identifies adequate area to satisfy the feasibility of the Applicant complying with '``'ice r~ the requirements of TCP Policy 8.1.3 (g) and its related condition of approval. ~ , h ,X¢ tut _ f v-- ,.i s Y ...Z R d".,r, 4 TCP Policy 8.1.3 (h) provides "The City shall require as a precondition to development ~ R~ , ~ a~ F approval that: Land be dedicated to implement the bicycle/pedestrian corridor in accordance with _ x f the adopted plan." saw The Applicants site does not abut. nor is it transversed by a proposed designated rr`~ ' ~ E ~ bicvcle!pedestrian corridor as identified in the City's adopted Plan. Therefore. Policy 3.1.3(h) ~ ~h ,z. V,g_p ,F does not apply. 5 - kf~t Y r-erl a a-,..e i f< TCP Policy 3.4.1. provides "The City shall locate bicvcle!pedestrian corridors in a 1- a--F ~ F _ manner which provides for pedestrian and bicycle users. safe and convenient movement in all f r3 ; F { parts of the City, by developing the pathway system shown on the adopted pedestrian bikeway 'Q ~ - ,t t 4 plan." The subject nropert does rot abut. nor is it traversed by. a designated bicycle!pedestrian < corridor in accordance with the City's adapted plan. In accordance with the adopted plan, a$ % bicycle!pedestrian corridor is designated to the west of Sit'' Scholls Ferry Road and is Lntended to I , L _ r;' 4 FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-09 ZON 93-03,SDR 93-1-t - ALBERTSON'S - 8 e, Al $ V -C- _ 3' - - i X 7,-,-" s r,: r.'a k, r, t,.trs*. - t_ a t X *•i- z'~d - - ' [ Z s - r -4 ` z - - - _ Vin., ,t Ir. _ !k _ in' x GS ~F },s 1'~h`z 's'ri ? * y - ~e p i t J rh t-- _ - - " ~ "yaps r- m a t - {r s~ "t xx 1 , r , f 4 k 3 t, - , r _1- I u r - n F -R ,:-~4 i ~r . ~ - A „ S rev , - x_-nS{..a.ui,..s r_ e,s,wr...~.~. _a.-~«- - . € - t 4. I - 't - \ t fi'4° c ~F t t- a m+ , a 'r ,a - t cross the future extension of Murray Boulevard. Since the actual route of the future `-t trarisportation improvement is determined, the City is not required to designate a stu e dy area i j L _ = Yx= r s,_,;.1-,r k'y,;. under TCP Policy 8.4.1. Further, the Applicant's proposed development provides sidewalks ,e; 't AJ,w _t" im:_,' - i` along each property frontage with access to cross-walks at the intersections of SW Scholls Ferry z g if , , Road at Walnut Street, and Northview Drive and Walnut Street. The Applicant has satisfied this s - f c - Ya- policy by providing transit and pedestrian orientation throughout the development of a walkway x system to and from adjoining streets. This will, in turn, link bicycle/pedestrian access to t - _ r - X: } sidewalk connections along SW Scholls Ferry Road and the future extension of Murray Boulevard, thereby eventually linking to the proposed bicycle/pedestrian corridor located y- , c k ; _ immediately west of SW Scholls Ferry Road when it is constructed. The Applicant has also t E 4' ~ ~ ' _ proposed to provide a potential bus turnout lane, bus stop and/or shelter location on SW Scholls s - n' - f " Ferry Road near the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Walnut Street in anticipation of future transit service. This policy is satisfied. t l'-, 2. Air, Water and Land Resources Quality: LCDC Goal 6. LUBA Opinion at 14-16. 1 -3 r The air, water and land resources quality requirements under LCDC Goal 6 are satisfied z - b the This requirement necessitates an analysis of the "discharges " that are projected I>'r' ~ _ = 'g, Y proposal. Vii: at "";:-4`",r%, : 3 to result from the Albertson's development, including air quality, solid waste, thermal, noise, Cr , r atmospheric or water pollutants, contaminants, or products therefrom. The Applicant has r q' provided an engineering study analyzing and providing design details to satisfactorily address all a <t r t waste and process discharges from the proposed development. This study, the Westech Report, 11 - , identifies that the Albertson's application will not violate or threaten to violate applicable city, ~ $ , ' state or federal environmental quality statutes, rules and standards. t ' f~,~~ N' - " `J 7 x- 6 Iz s_ In accordance with the Westech Report, solid waste shall be stored and removed in -,S h compliance with all applicable regulations for design, construction and location of solid wastes storage areas and equipment. The Applicant's plan does not violate any city, state or federal _ w . s c 0~ thermal discharge regulations because atmospheric thermal discharges are not regulated for the I proposed type of uses. Regulations relating to waterway thermal discharges do exist, but the - P roposed application does not involve their application. With the Applicant using evaporative c a condensers for its building, all applicable regulations for noise shall be satisfied by the site , ~x f ,i a development plan. - J 1 " , t r 7 f a - Similarly, all atmospheric or air quality requirements are satisfied by the proposed ` i"- ' ~ . mss' t i development. The water pollutants regulations are also satisfied. The Westech Report has t~-l si incorporated the design requirements for water discharge facilities adequate to satisfy all city, ~ ; arsR state and federal requirements for water quality and quantity control. As a result, the applicant ` >r µa has shown substantial and reliable evidence to establish the feasibility of Albertson's compliance ' - with LCDC Goal 6 requirements. _ V < --'r R-- - iz '•r 1 a g 3. Air Quality Impacts: TCP Policy 1.1.1. LUBA Opinion at 16-17 ' - sy , E ~ - sue - ' x The Westech Report describes the applicable criteria of TCP Policy 4. 1.1 as they apply to ' _ 5 " r , ~`x the potential air quality impacts of the Albertson's application. The report identifies that an ~'i, r E _ri £g x w x S FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-091ZON 93-03/SDR 93-I4 - ALBERTSON'S - 9 x a.ar i - a - - { r r r~,,- , r Y n7 , r. a - x r F -C~ G 7~ D 1 A # Fin `Y ~ 4 V J L P - y 4r - 'n(- F t _ - Y- 2 - 51 W N c F _ - y -as' d T { * 4 x Y i 3 [ ! 1 - F ~a,...s_._...,,~.. ~~.....:__..,,_ZL.; a;s Ri - H 3 r 7 , G j w:c4 ...v ,v-e-.'4 _ •w`-.+.wi,in, { 44 r1 --Y _ i srr`a ' x-s'd ate` - - .r {sr} g y..e. } -KK - , - ....m - .....e.«,n .x,.r,......~. s: 4..r.=...,,...r3.4; Y;=w........x x,rr„ s _ ai'ri - 4 n ' - Y Y N y 'C 3,,• 'T - gt i s 1• t_ c r k V - ,67 K. are } r,.M1. t _v R N } ~ - = Indirect Source Construction Permit Application is presently being prepared and will be - - ® a s r f,::_ V s m. a submitted to the DEQ. The Westech Report identifies that this application complies with ally { , ~ applicable standards and has a high feasibility of being approved by the DEQ. In addition, the C- P s _ C zone and the surrounding residential properties will result in fewer and shorter automobile trips Z ` F ` ~ , ' f ; F to obtain commercial goods and services. The proposed center, as designed and conditioned, , , ~ %n,, I N ; will provide for ease of access to the surrounding neighborhoods. This in turn will help satisfy 7__ ' I Policy 4.1.1 by reducing potential air quality impacts from the new residents and their = a y o 1 automobiles. = 6 t b s a P- -A" JrS M , i iF -fat, ¢A 5ma, Opponents assert that the Applicant failed to address each of the requirements under TCP t Policy 4.1.1. However, the Westech Report submitted by the Applicant identified that all of the y, ~ - ' x , j re quirements under this policy are implemented through compliance with Oregon's Indirect "i r s ~ , , -,y Source Review Program. The Westech Report identified the applicable criteria and ' } 3~, k , methodology establishing that the Applicant would be able to comply with these requirements Yf t - - k and obtain the necessary permit. The Report further identified that Westech had contacted the ~ ~_ti ~ ° j DEO; ennf ed on the requirements and expectations of complian ce feasibility, an d incorporated k t i 11 those statements within the Report. The Applicant shall be required to obtain approval of the y 5," z~~ A. ` a Indirect Source Construction Permit, if such permit is still required prior to construction, as a ~ sae s ` , t . condition of approval for this land use application. Such permit should not be required in n V. J, T > - - - advance of a rovin this a lication due to the DE Q ~`~`"r,W~; - ' PP g pp Q proposing to modify its regulations so that the permit may not be required before the Applicant seeks building permits. Therefore, the r r applicability and approval of the permit shall be made a condition of approving this land use iTf F { l ~x tiI z application, = A t~ This policy is satisfied by the Applicant's submittal and plan, and the Applicant has ~ k ' - y 3 -z 0 r provided substantial evidence of its feasibility of compliance with the associated conditions of~ r } approval. t, Y { f ua 4. Water Quality Compliance: TCP Policy 4.2.1. LUBA Opinion at 17._ i j This policy requires "All development within the Tigard urban planning area shall x" -il, _ 1.11 f comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards:' The Applicant's t £ _ { engineering study, the Westech Report, establishes that the Applicant complies with all the tC requirements of this policy. In particular, the report identifies at pages 5 through 9 that the water ~ , t r r i quality facilities designed for the Albertson's site are intended to comply with all applicable r 'o-1Z x 9 federal, state and regional water quality standards. The report further describes these standards," tx ' how they are being complied with and that Albertson's compliance with these standards is rr r ~i'- c feasible. t"' i ~-F",i-- :a ' 5 _ Also, this policy will be satisfied through the development review and building permit q `a i G processes at which time a development proposal for this site must be shown to comply with r applicable qua! requirements cafederal, state, and reLional water -u-l y implementation of the i x :r-including r j r , - Y non-.source pollution control plan in compliance with the Oregon Environmental Quality ,A ~il Yt, ti 1 Commission's applicable rules for the Tualatin River Basin. The proposed redesignation would Y t '*r 4 - J i FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-091ZON 93-03,'SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 10 + FL` $ 1 {Ye xv t 1g k. y- a f - p ) f 3 - - - ' ' J - G R~ , , ~ " ;a L , ~ . - 1 , r E I I ~ ~ . , , ~ ~ ~ I . , ~ . , . - , I . J ~ q~ r""', , , " , - ~ - . S I - ) FP I` 1 dfi-,.v _ r { s - _ - - - IL ,_111~1~ Y{ 3 A 4 t j t } 4 [2, r' - - 4 'f _ 4- - } -1 k, 4 s-'-•_.~°'_,- -~~nr " , ,----_-f', ^-rr^,--~xT.-r +~.r Q•^,.~, rF' . ~ -.-.y_.... _ t ~ . a_._cs_.. - s~ a_ _.y..f _ __v- K-5_- - m~''-~: r_ ors - L~=r , 2~ C~k tY - rY - ' ,211 , -~,Ww, . L , - :1 ~ a ~ -,x aka -sus s 2 t"h1 - T ! 1 l- --'S- i s .`,tsra r - ~....~zr;u.n.,..-..,.... ..e- .~,......,>_,.asp..zzav,.era>..,.~..,....__...s.___-._... it - - „~'`,i 4 ,..-s t +r Ek - s," e ti ¢ rr r p ? 3 r' r i : i T _ ~ Y_. 'z- t i 'F 1 k ! y2 ! T . z not by itself affect compliance with this plan policy. The Applicant has complied with TCP „tom Policy 4.2.1 and has established feasibility for compliance with all associated conditions of , x r f approval. - pj k S _ F~~#~aLAk i~ S~ - ,dr _ 5. Commercial Compatibility: TCP Policy 5.4. LUBA Opinion at 20-22- b y ~ --8 k -7 :tt,r -,~i - - TCP 5.4 provides: "The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial - 'n `l' - =r . development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for ' _ a _ z } commercial or industrial uses." I ',tw <'S t - - : Albertson's application affects a "residential area" that includes the residential and " l 1- I commercial lands surrounding the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. This s "residential area" includes the existing Neighborhood Commercial located at the northeast comer Q k ^,j, ; ` ~T3 - sr of this intersection, the 8 acre parcel proposed for community commercial, the Castlehill ` r i s residential subdivision located in the southeast of the intersection, and the multifamily " designations located to the west, northwest and south. _ ? 1 _~_x' Y y A w' The application also proposes to replace the existing designated commercial use (N-C) int - 3 e a - z this residential area with a "Community Commercial" designation. The phrase "residential t ' ~ ` u s area," referred to in TCP 5.4, includes the area and uses identified in the above paragraph. As a -s t -4 result, the proposed C-C designation in this residential area will not create new commercial ~ ,,o qr:-?~,- h where no commercial previously existed. The N-C designation already existed in this designated "residential area"; aUd the C-C designation will replace it and shift it across Walnut Street to the e} ti 1 ~ " : other comer (all within the same "residential area"). ~ Wit" S 5 _ s x TCP 5.4 does not restrict different types of commercial, changes in size or changes in - E r 3-P7 K, type of commercial under this policy. The policy is intended to address restricting the g~ - encroachment of new commercial in residential areas where no commercial previously existed ` Since the Applicant's proposal changes one type of commercial to another type where a , k; M - - commercial designation already existed in this residential "area", Albertson's application - ~ . -,M-~; complies with TCP 5.4.x" F {t ! n'"&; ? F. Nevertheless, the Albertson's proposal replaces approximately 7 acres of N-C with 8 't } r acres of Community Commercial within the same residential area. The Kittleson Traffic study ~~'r, 'fir r, J t submitted by the Applicant in the earlier land use hearings identified that the traffic impacts r 4 k ah between 8 acres of C-C use and the commercial designation on 6.93 acre parcel (current C-N = t - , , / designation) are nearly equivalent. The Westech Report submitted by the Applicant further ` ~ , 1 ~ , C _7 identifies that there will be no significant offsite impacts by the Applican t's development and they W "discharges" from the project will be contained or filtered to comply with all applicable - - - governmental requirements and standards. Further, the reduced commercial square footage and ~5Z- q a . ` allowed uses, increased area for landscaping/buffering, and increased dedication of area for right- " ; ~ ' of-way along Scholls Ferry Road, renders the commercial usage of the eight acre parcel nearly t _ ~ ~ - I equivalent in size and impacts with potential development of Tax Lot 100 as commercial. The c y,; , - - r net impact to surrounding residential uses is not significant. t r', ,j i r m°.' a - - y,;h,.vd,.., tea. 4~ t t- ~ FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-09-20N 93-03!SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - I 1 t 4 is T r -ter { f-, $3w. - a 7 r ~ h F n~ ,-y;aM1_- ~~3•+,r~'~WFi<.fw ~iy ,F .3. 'S`CE '"4 F3';PTM _ - s„•.•-• ~ _ _ E , - R J R d _ r - _ j , 54r. r t _ f - w - - 's'ix ny f' W ZP F - W - i „ -m` _ , ,,'~,~~-'rj~-~"""-V L , " , : , - ,-It . ~ 1: ~ , ~ . , -:~t ~ ~ r: . 11 - ~ 7!~_ , - X4 i Y~ P - Jt 1"1 1 Y. 12 ~ . _ , ~ , , ~ r' - , 3 qy - - J # _ _ - _ C: t - + a ~4Sot t.7 I;' z - f _ 5Y r '9 f - r ,5"a r' x, 1. - i c I 't ~ d , £ y ..i .m,.~~.ura,.. w...:.v'.i.:C ar..J:.:.t.»~.f3'~ ~~'s.Lxia~ae~~_ ~_.._4z . - d - p-4 E ~ CI x 11 -J 4 g S M1 F 4 xK ~y: Moving the commercial from the northeast comer of the Scholls Ferry Road and Walnuts A ' } ~ Street intersection to its southeast comer will allow the commercial use to be excavated into the - ' x ` ti# l i hillside. This relocation of the commercial across the street is not precluded by TCP Policy 5.4 , ` `"r# F , since the new location will still be within the same residential area. This new location will z- j r },j provide better buffering and the opportunity to greatly diminished adverse impacts to f surrounding residential uses. As a result, Albertson's proposal provides a better compatibility _ f between commercial designations and residential uses in this "area" than the previously ' t - designated N-C use and Tax Lot 100 location. Moreover, the Albertson's application complies $rs with the locational criteria identified in the comprehensive plan for "Community Commercial" ' } designations. TCP Policy 5.4 is intended to be satisfied by the commercial use applicant r a- complying with all the applicable locational criteria under TCP Policy 12.2.1. Where the ,ate t ' applicant satisfies, as has Albertsons, all of the locational criteria for Community Commercial + j ~ under TCP 12.2.1.4.13, the requirements for TCP Policy 5.4 are also satisfied. The findings pertaining to TCP 12 .2.1 were previously appealed to LUBA as the "Eighth Assignment of Error"; and those findings were found lawfully adequate. ' , ti z} . ' Opponents asserted that the Applicant had failed to satisfy the requirements of TCP `+,5 E ~ --'.3 }i ~.y,~ 3 Policy 5A. The Opponents based their argument upon the policy's definition of "residential area", and assumed that would be a 1 1/2 mile radius from the Applicant's property. However, , fit{ the City Council interprets the policy language to mean the residential area surrounding the ? , , Applicant's property as defined above in this section. The Opponents also argued that TCP ~ x 1 ` , 4 Policy 5.4 application requires a comparison of development limitations between C-N and C-C _ - zones. However, the C-N zone for this "residential area" was the result of an earlier "mistake" at ~ ~ ' ~F the time the area including the Applicant's site was annexed by the City. Therefore, the r,- - x - development limitations of the C-N zone are irrelevant for this analysis. The Community ~ ~ '-M, 4 Commercial designation is intended to fully replaced the former C-N designation in this " , ,J- "residential area." t x_x~ a The Applicant has satisfied all the requirements of TCP Policy 5.4. R 61 l 6. Buffering: TCP Policy 6.6.1. LUBA Opinion at 24-28. t , - l 3 , ~ n~ k" - TCP Policy 6.6.1 pertains to buffering and screening between different types of land uses ;,-i fir- r ' and imposes factors to be considered in determining the type and extent of the required buffer or ' 1` i screen. The City has also adopted CDC 18.100 to implement this comprehensive plan policy for t• ; _ i a landscaping and screening. In the prior decision, specific findings set forth Albertson's ~ F"' ' t - ; compliance with all the applicable requirements of CDC 18.100. These findings were not s' ' t' I ~ appealed to LUBA from the prior decision. As a result, these findings, presently, are deemed ! - , } " s r legally valid. Since CDC 18.100 was adopted to implement TCP Policy 6.6.1, a determination of ~ f compliance with CDC 18.100 shall be deemed as satisfying the requirements of TCP Policy t i - t 6.6.1. The applicant has complied with all the requirements of TCP Policy 6.6.I I. , - e ` , r d' 4- a t d. w In any event. Albertson's site development plan fully complies with the specific r , ' ' provisions of TCP Policy 6.6.1. Under TCP Policy 6.6.1.a.1, the City is to determine the ; "purpose of the buffer". In this case, the potential buffering or screening factors for "noise" and { -i 'A", r, Y 3F f f ALBERTSON'S - 12 t-- ~ 0 ~ I . I FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-09. ZON 93-031SDR 93-14 - t , k J- t- di YF``'' f V - - F tnT ~t . 1 , 1 rd 4 -til t { S U 'f i z LL......~~-- ,4 « PC ,..j - - j _ 1i L t - t K 3 J " - , -1 - I , - - - v 'ok r', ~ . _ ~ I . 1 . ~ ; I , ~ q . , i ~ _ ~ - , ~ ~ , , , ~ _ i~ I - -~j k M' , . r- 11 - - -j 4y 7 'T r°- - r -tZr 2 - t - X ~'L f - - r ;d y h t~ # - , s "air pollution" are either not significant or are effectively resolved by the design plan. The 4z ' Applicant has submitted an engineering study, the Westech Report, which identifies that the ' . ~s ' Albertson's application complies with all applicable noise emission regulations and will not t.:-, , {c create off-site noise problems for surrounding neighborhoods. Similarly, the report identifies k i ` Y 1 that there are no atmospheric pollution emissions generated from the proposed use. Nevertheless, p ' t 7 Albertson's proposed landscaped buffer and screening will provide an effective buffer for any potential noise and air pollution that might be generated by the proposed commercial use and $ 1, ~ , - y,y Y . an prospective charges in use or tenants.'u h f t° { As a potential "air pollution absorber", "noise filter" "d• t filte-" and "visual barrier', F, -t , i the proposed Alvcrison s landscape plan satisfies and exceeds City requirements. For the y purposes of the buffer, the width and height are defined in CDC 18.100. The applicable matrix ~ j i 3'a s under the CDC 18.100.070.11 and 18.100.130 establishes that the applicant must provide at least 1 - s ~ ~ ~ t 1 10 feet of buffer and/or screening between the proposed shopping center site and nearby ` 1 11 -1", i residential uses. The site development plan provides for excavation of the site to lower the grade- ` > f' ray ` " approximately 24 feet near the single-f u,it,y ,csiuauia, area on Eire southeast and the arwit: . - - family area on the south. This excavation will also reduce the noise associated with the loading t,': „ "q'°``y=xz_:' : ' - 'f - ; r area designed for the rear of the grocery store structure by screening the loading area with the g<<"< P h ~ , j large building and the 24 foot deep landscaped slope. Between these residential uses and the - i F proposed commercial uses will be landscaped areas that range in width between 37 to 60 feet on , < ~ ; , j the southeast and between 20 to 82 feet on the south. The Albertson's landscape plan designates - ~ these buffer areas as also providing an "Evergreen Screen" to provide ayear-around buffer and x ; r screened area. The types and sizes of plants are specifically identified on the "Landscape Plan' „ tZ ~ ~7 t0, ~ , an d they comply with the City's requirements. T : , J Ot In addition to landscape buffering and screening along the Northview Drive, the applicant - ~ t ~ is also providing a brick wall the entire length of the subject property. Landscaping widths v between the parking lot and Northview Drive on the southeast range between 30 to 45 feet. ~ . _ Again, the es and sizes of the plants are identified on the "Landscape Plan." Landscaped types • 1' ~ M r = - j buffers along Walnut Street and Scholls Ferry Road (the northeast, north and northwest borders _ ll1 e of the site) range in width between 26 to 135 feet. The overall landscaping plan exceeds the City 1 1 ~r f1!r- , 33 0 o r 3 Code's 20% requirements by providing almost 30% landscaped buffers and screens around the perimeter of the site. The landscaped buffer and screening plan surrounds the entire site and thereby provides t - IN } 4 adequate buffering and screening between the proposed commercial use and the single-family , ° 4} xy residential to the southeast, the multi-family residential to the northeast, north, west and south. ~ ' ` - It 3 The buffer and screening is also sufficient for both stationary and mobile viewers along or , ~ , W$ ' ~ - abutting Scholls Ferry Road. Walnut Street and Northview Drive. The multi-family residential , x r, designated property to the south will provide stationary viewers, and the proposed landscaped ~ M. fi b ' area separating these uses will provide an effective buffer and screen. The "Landscape Plan" Z~~ L' , G x calls for a solid year-around "Evergreen Screen" along this entire perimeter. This screening is also extended for the length of the building along Northview Drive. A solid ornamental brick T~ wall is also proposed along Northview Drive to provide an additional and adequate screen n t- r ~ between the proposed commercial use and the single-family residential area to the southeast. I, 5 FINAL RE vtAND ORDER -CPA 93-09: ZON 93-031SDR 93.14 - ALBERTSON'S - 13 e } F T r 6 1 f__ - - £ X48-i-.~ s t F t t_ - - - 4 } i% - _ J L~-fib ,,,4'~ a - t- i r, - i. - rr t f 4'~ a J } t F I t P' z,? J - _ o r J 7 4 ~.Tr _ _._.•1.-^. v_Y_._ c ] - -_..-Y - ,",._t_ _ = , 11~ - - v-Al . 11 F ~ Y y5 q sa'~i. 1 4t ;s rtrgtf ` n -A tt'# die' <t - - $ 'E } - - § '9 L f a m _ i -£4i~ £ - 'A`I 3auvu.-..GL-..ePSmu.u'.hY/:»'~.A..~2.._-~_t........as w.aa4.,:tF _ _~..~rwrsruan R -,.c't 3 ,4 S - 1I - a i4 - - Y.l i _ - N~d - - - - - at(' # `Y J 1i ffi ~h2Y S Special screening is not necessary along Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. The neighboring a 5 f uses are separated by at least 45 feet of roadway, additional distance for sidewalks and additional Y : t F _ ,r 3 T1 # ' , depth of the proposed landscaping. The Applicant's landscaping in these locations substan tially exceeds the depth requirements of the applicable code. Also, the traffic impacts along Scholls I , : A Ferry Road and Walnut Street, not associated with the proposed development are substantial and 'a~`=~ K., mask impacts created at the Albertson's site. - ; f 3 - $kz q F "4` `ms , s , ` The application complies with all applicable requirements of TCP Policy 6.6.1, ti ~ , r including all requirements pertaining to noise impacts. The Applicant has previously submitted a - noise study and a current eno", P^^^ study that cstauiisires the Applicant's compliance with all I regulations pertaining to noise generation by the proposed uses. The Applicant's buffering and e ~ ' ',y> C s _4 screening details in its landscape plan provide additional assurances that all potential noise r _ impacts will be sufficiently mitigated. 3 11 1 rt 4 L r Y 4 , 3'} _ - -i } fr ~ ~ - 7. Storm Drainage Facilities Feasibility: TCP Policy 7.1.2. LUBA Opinion at 28-29. } i+YSi j .tA Albertson's has designated a portion of the landscaped area along Scholls Ferry Road as s ~ ~ - the location for the storm drainage facilities that will satisfy all applicable water quality and r < 's" quantity requirements under TCP Policy 7.1.2. In addition, the Applicant's engineers have sy- &~`ro? ~ f completed a storm drainage facilities analysis and designed a system to satisfy all these t 'x i~ requirements (the Westech Report). The report identifies specific requirements, calculations for { compliance and design characteristics for both water quality and quantity. The report concludes that: "Both of these requirements are met by stormwater facilities we have designed and h - ' ' t ~ presented in detail in the report". The Westech Report also establishes the "feasibility" of i ~ z Albertson's ultimate compliance with the applicable conditions of approval, and constitutes sufficient substantial evidence for a respective finding. The Applicant has complied with the §a_1 requirements of TCP Policy 7.1.2. x-~ t 8. Design Criteria: CDC 18.61.055. LUBA OPution at 31-33.~~ F , Section 18.61.055 contains a number of design guidelines and standards for C-C z ~ ~"Z development. The basic design concepts presented by the applicant are consistent with these " a Code provisions. The Applicant's revised plan shows to a new sidewalk along the southern side w - of the central driveway access along SW Scholls Ferry Road. The northern most driveway access , # along SW Scholls Ferry Road already has a sidewalk paralleling the driveway through the "mini- " j park". This Code section will be satisfied with a condition of development approval re uiring *t § , ,,,~,',~i,'-,'~~~,-~,-~,."~,,~:",~~ 0 i ~ . # the addition of one more walkway along the northern side of the driveway entrance located at the F a t southern end of the property along SW Scholls Ferry Road. The revised Site Plan includes new i walkways through the center of the parking lot (north and south) and a cross-walkway between ~ F j the commercial pads (east and west). These walkways are raised where adjacent to parking stalls r , - ~ '4* , 1 and consisting of distinctive materials or markings where located across driving corridors. The rs, _ revised plan also includes a staircase walkway from the grocery store to SW Northview Drive to - _,,V ` t satisfy pedestrian connections for that adjoining area. These additional walkways, along with i t.. ! added walkwav associated with the driveway along Scholls Ferry Road, satisfy the requirements - # i' 6 11 ! in CDC 18.61.055. Other revisions by the applicant include provision of evaporator units placed , _ , - 1,:' w~ t . K FINAL REb1AND ORDER -CPA 93-091ZON 93-03%SDR 93-I4 - ALBERTSON'S - 14 tr F t k - r r d 4 t i 3 _ S M ,s^+~.,-...-- ..x,.- r rn, :.air:°~ S [ e } Ck x ; a fk`+. T, .1 ` t i` S r~ 5.{'Lp ? k r I 45-- t - -t 4 F G { d E t ( - +i Y 9 11 r'. I- 2 SR s - y ztaz - y..~. r__ -_.-.s vc_t L-.:.~ ~x~_n ._.,..i:_. a. _...__a3L v._. _ ..i__.... .h..i ..tY-n~-.._.a. a. _23-_ _-1- av.____.- V yr - - Vr h "!e - _ - 3 { - l 4 4 ke 4' Y,y 2 i~ ~l .7. ,I, I Y~ ~ , f - 4 ~Wl -1 4Y ,i i, tsyu} ~r5 behind the building a with re g ertairung to noise i'` !f=s'`==,:- - - r(x _ s, t mezzanine level to assure compliance g P CD A 1. impacts; requested details for the landscaping plan showing sizes, locations and species of -r c- 1.2 _ landscaping materials; and details of cut-off shields on lighting fixtures; all in compliance with st t- , + ^M L' the applicable provisions under CDC 18.61.055. { - € - - 2 w r j7~~ 1' 4 I y- 40 - ~ - - Section 18.61.055 A. 1. contains building design guidelines which have been satisfied. The Applicant has provided a design for the grocery store and a list of required design criteria for h 1 i7 - z all subsequent structures which are suf::cicnt , ,of assuring compliance with the Code provisions , , _ , } - for all structures on the site. Although the grocery store will have blank walls facing SW ~ - Northview Drive, this building elevation will be screen from view by landscaping and the R ~ { excavated embankment, and should result in a pleasing appearance. N " . - " e J ' y - 1. Section 18.61.055. A. 2. discourages loading areas that face toward residential uses. The , ` , 4 ~ a 3 proposed loading area abuts an undeveloped residential parcel and is near Castle Hill s # 0, t r Subdivision. Because of the proposed grading of the site, the loading area will be approximately, ~ e 24 feet below the existing grade. This design serves to mitigate noise impacts to adjoining , E ` T d will also provide a t t, , , t residential areas along with the landscaping and year-around screening; an r 1 v - satisfactory visual buffer. f M, 11 ~r-11 r.._ s ;rug.:. , Section 18.61.055.B. 1. requires internal walkways to facilitate pedestrian circulation on R ~ryr j the site. The revised site plan shows walkways in the vicinity of the building locations and{ sa , throughout the parking area. As identified above and with the condition of approval requiring an r Ts ? -N~ I additional walkway along the southern most driveway entrance on SW Scholls Ferry Road, the-Kk~ s - revised site plan provides sufficient walkways and accesses to comply with this Code - ( r; ' ;k, PR,, t • t requirement. ~ ] ` Section 18.61.055.B.2. and 3. are complied with by the Applicant's plan, submittals, and ' . _t with the required conditions of approval. Y, t a~~~s C. DECISION: _ _,i 1. Approval of CPA 93-0009/ZCA 93.0009 to change the Comprehensive Plan and , 5 Zoning designations on Tax Lot 100 (Washington County Tax Map 251, 4BB) from ~,t~ ~ f Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) to Medium-High Residential/Planned Development - ie ' • 1 [R-25(PD)I, and to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation for 8 acres of~s` ~£7 r, Tae Lot 200 from Medium and Medium-High Residential/Planned Development, R-25, e r 0, 4 # rr ~3 ' LO COnltnrrCrlty COI71n1eCCla1 (C-Q. 1 f Ley. afi ~ . F - i The City Council finds that the change will promote the general welfare of the City and i 3 n e will not be significantly detrimental or injurious to surrounding land uses. The > _ Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendments shall be finalized at the time a ` jj ~ i building or other development permit (e.g., grading) is issued. It is further ordered that x - +t X R the applicant and parties to these proceedings be notified of the entry of this order. ; g~`~ ' 2 Approve the Site Development portion of the application with the following - 'r _ "i *f~k rr 3 c..... _ ...ems ..a,.a...- ° f - ~ a...- ° ~ - FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-09/ZON 93-03ISDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 15 F rv! ~ _ f ~ 3 Z ip } 1 l ' R '4- Z _ i d 4 _ '.1 f' - k J' M1 I' a # C £ * 5 4 4tf ~1 , k 6 - V { - ) 11! S ' }f J3'3} 7 t Y~ - - Y 1 3 1 ; i •1x.,4 ; - - i f _}I 1. v4 - k -.4 - - Y _ 4 9. p a - a 1 - s- 0 y - -f i l _ _ . ~ - 'r ~r,~ , , I I ~ , - , " - - . _ ~ ` " . - , I- - " - - . ~ __1 - ~ t_ ` - "I" , ~ . , - i , - - _J ~ 11 .1 :11, _111 - -1 I I I , _ , - r - ~r~ I ~ " , r " L 1, 1 J ''2- f ~ ~ - ffi5g~~, ~ , F7f- ~Q- '52 Dfr - - _ - .r _ c ti : 'i - - t , r~' S - ,r~•~ _d _ - -t4 fit- -5 y kh1 Y.x I r _ r r.-.ate _ x a4' _s s'" r-' ' a suer - + ; - sY rr 1k € z 5 ' " a t ' conditions (unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of t j building permits): _ - f s 11 a a , a. A revised site plan shall be submitted for approval which includes the following 1- v ~ modifications: r - z , 5 3 n ~ (1) A walkway along the northern side of the driveway entrance located at the t ~ , ~ sr4 - - , h southern end of the property along SW Scholls Ferry Road shall be provided. ` ~r - i N ' Differing walkway materials shall be used to designate walkway areas. Bicycle I - ' 1 racks shall be provided within or near the columned facade area in front of the 1 _ ~ - , grocery store structure. ~ ~ ~ri - (2) A staircase sidewalk from the grocery store shall connect with SW Northview ~ , 443 . ' ` Drive. sze AM - - 11. (3) Two of the proposed handicapped parking spaces in front of the grocery store e -t1 , _ i (the northwesterly spaces) shall be moved to the parking area immediately in front 3, 3 of Building A" next to the Albertson's grocery store location. Incompliance with # . _=r kx' " TCP Policy ~s=_ ~ h _ -r=: y y 8.1.3, standard handicapped parking spaces shall be required f m N! or all rf I ~h ~ , n . _r - h commercial uses throughout the site as buildings are constructed. ^ - { , - , s (4) Details concerning the screening of all mechanical equipment to be used on } r - ' - _ the perimeter of any building or on the roof shall be supplied by the applicant " 1 f } prior to issuance of building permits for that building. g . ` ar dar 5 , s 5 .s ~ (5) All cooling units shall be as specified within the noise study dated September n 29, 1994. The study recommended the use of quieter evaporative condensers ~t~ ; located within the mezzanine level of the store rather than air cooled condensers units located on the roof. # _ - " sea r ' 3 (6) The landscaping plan and landscaping shall achieve a minimum of 35% ~ I canopy coverage at maturity over the parking stall areas. 1 11.11 aG~~~ E - , ` _ (7) Building design details shall be provided for the entire development consistent b - r L with the model details incorporated in the approved first building. Of key ?y ' 4 importance is consistent size and scale of buildings and signs. The applicant shall .f { ' 5 create a sign for the center identifying gn of all - program the size, location and desi , , rte' s > freestanding and wall signage. * ~ - - frb r„ + r (8) All lighting fixtures shall use the cut-off shields identified by the Applicant to r ~j f N prevent the spillover of light to adjoining properties. g ~ r - ~ - - k + SP` s` r f, y f (9) If the driveway design is utilized which would intersect with SW Northview K -r` _ r Drive south of the comer pad towards SW Walnut Street, construction of a~- x V - driveway alone the southern property towards SW Scholls Ferry Road should be a" °T'°L 'k x P 5 y '1 FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-09/ZON 93-03/SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 16 " ' u c ' x 56 i t 4 , s s1a ~ o~,:~,-, -_'~J~-*~~,_~ 1.11, . - - - ~ , - , ~ _ - " ~ , ' I 1.11 ' a F fy k t K' f d - f & r~.4a h's t 7 - .p C { q - x s - r--s 't' L 5 f ` P stE x_ d z z z t _=i x: f ~,.,7 H - W 4.c.1.._.o.rZ ~`.F.jar r. i~~.. ..__~r - r~._..a. ...t...-.~ i .i ,_....i C.l _tint.s ~}`Y.~~ 1. 1.__.i . Sq, fn.:,,,, 11 - r x ~ _7 77 ~ ` " _ ems` A £ _ _ - _ . _ - 5 ~'r y k s _ :~+rtP Sfi- ,.U rhi' - _ - --_a ,;;ci.>Aa, wr- r ti - tlp 211_s ~ - , k ~,20`&;~N~ ~,,-,,,'IT ,1 ~ t - . i t a - t, fvi - Mist a M 4 x ~1 , considered to allow for future access between the 3.95 acre parcel and the a } - 1 Albertson's site. ~ - ~ a r t_ - { I STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. ' — t } 11 1, ~ v x t i` b. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings I - s shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets s ~ n- of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a a 4 's # ' Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these + , - plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should onlyt r _ include sheets relevant to public improvements). STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, fie, _ , ~ ~j Engineering Department. 4 ~ t0 r L - err 6 ''T~ , ' S' sw ' c. Building permits will not be issued and construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Department has reviewed and approved ,e- 3 n, $ ' t>a 4 the public improvement plans and a street opening permit or construction compliance t i^ r agreement has been executed. A 100% performance assurance or letter of agreement, a -rc , _ j~rr r r.;x. t_ n ,a developer-engineer agreement, the payment of a permit fee and a sign c, ; . I b - installation/streetlight fee are required. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering ",,r -1* Department. - F ' d. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Scholls Ferry 1~~~ ff Road frontage to increase the right-of-way to 37 feet from the centerline. If the existing ~ n f s f right-of--way has been dedicated to the required width, the applicant shall submit survey ,t k and title information to confirm. The description of any additional right-of-way shall be s m" F 3;s ' tied to the existing right-of--way centerline. For additional information contact } v < 1 sx Washington County Survey Division. In the future when transit ridership is extended to - ~ , ,~V the subject property, the applicant may be required to provide transit stops, bus turnout ~ x f lanes and/or shelters at or near the "mini-pazk" in accordance with the design t~ specifications of the City's Engineering Department. The City may elect to require such W - ~ " ~ construction after duly providing notice to all landowners within 250 feet of the site and " _ Z.1 F~ ~ 9 conducting a scheduled public hearing for such decision. s s#y t r ` 11[ - rz F s 5't 3hi„e5 6 S } t 1 e. Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, curb, ; , - ~t ~ t * - z J. ' asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streetlights, and t r n 2 + : underground utilities shall be installed along the SW Scholls Ferry Road frontage, ..,~,T including the frontage of all parcels within the minor land partition. Improvements along € , f v ~ SW Scholls Ferry Road shall be designed and constructed to Washington County ` x fit' - t Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards and shall conform to an alignment , ~ - t t a _ r approved by the Washington County Engineering Department. For additional information contact Washington County Engineering Department. f . ~ ; t ` r - s r_.: £ The applicant shall obtain a facility permit from the Department of Land Use and r f I d-- . r Transportation of Washington County, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW u . 7- 3 r3, - v i.. ~Jt~ rr»j-l>rGV V YJ-UJiJLit YJ-14 - HLO CK I'JV(`I J - 17 , ~ v -r _ t c - -j k ± raw sr _ k.~ i / _ - S i _ ak S r f1 r try Y a r { - _ ,'i t t[f Y f y 6 F _ SR 3 ' t F h s" J ny F W ;Kr f - s -I F R- J _ S:v rJ'1 --i- - - .sue ~ ._~...=c. ...._.v..~ Ll may.. ~.v. . ._a w.. _ ~~il_ 1~-_t_:_.r - _ - vim.' _.~..t..- 3- _ - Y t.- v _ 3 a --y } q~•wr y'ty,; xr-}~! 4F - 47 - - Jt Y ~ Stu x+, z yr y. - i ,.y~t~'~-s-~s. .a- ''2'+- ,~iA 3 - - U £ - - - - f f- 'rt - 4,, 4J4 L~( ar-~£. ~~._L„z6TM.# - , ..~..a,_<... , Q ,0 Yi 1 P R 5 3'.h Y, 3 G ~ ' Scholls Ferry Road. A copy of this permit shall be provided to the City Engineering ' ~ "f I Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. # s `,-i f x , r Z : r a w t ~k, 3- _ 'cam T' Y ry , k - . g. Standard half-street improvements, including concrete sidewalk, driveway apron, ; 470 " li^hL and tindereround utilities shall be installed along the SW Northview Drive, 8 ' z 4 y street6 _ h , <x K including the 3.95 acre multi-family frontage of SW No;Uhvie u Drive. Improvements , r ` „ shall be designed and constructed to local street standards and shall conform to the - + s ti z,',:=n K alignment of existing adjacent improvements or an alignment approved by the° ' r _ - i` i Engineering Department. STAFF CONTENT: Michael Anderson, Engineering t .k € R 5t " ' ' Department. 11~ } - f dt rv y{ : h. The applicant shall submit sanitary sewer plans to the City of Beaverton for their $r j approval. The plans shall also be submitted for the review and approval of the City of - fin s Tigard Engineering Department. A copy of the approved plans shall be provided to the ? ? > , # City of Tigard prior to the construction of any public improvements. ~ _ i. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as established under the I " is guidelines of Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 9147. Submitted 3 j 11 ti plan. STAFF =n= " I -:o design information shall include an operation and maintenance p fir, ' _ CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. s - - - - J_~ " ~ ~A~,~_ ~-~r,~ 11 D-11~_~-' k--, j. The Applicant shall demonstrate that storm drainage runoff can be discharged into the I, a - 4 , ` r existing draina ewa s without significantly impacting properties downstream. STAFF ,'fix r g Y 4, sir r CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. F4 t, , y a s s N a ~;y F t 7 F 7- ,ft.zxt-t R 'R`te' t k. The proposed privately operated and maintained sanitary sewer plan-profile details * _ ~ . r shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans; and the storm drainage system - ` 4 F plan-profile details shall be completed in accordance with the Westech Report sut::rit by the applicant. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 25 rt I. The applicant shall obtain a "Joint Permit" from the City of Tigard. This permit shall r ' , meet the requirements the NPDES and Tualatin Basin Emotion Control Program. , ~'t r - ` STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. t "IN4 -I F1, - fr in. A grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. A 1 r soils report shall be provided detailing the soil compaction requirements. STAFF a t - f ~ t' 4 $ CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 'If a ~ MX t ,~~7 'es n. The applicant shall provide a geo-technical report that addresses the slope stability j5 { adjacent to SW Northview Drive and the overall grading conditions of the proposed p ? ; << ts` development. in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building , % ~ - R Code. STAFF CONTACT: Nlichael Anderson. Engineering Department. - s: r o. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead facilities along each frontage or , ~,r-' r --x -rao4r- x bar L r ' " t FINAL RENIAND ORDER - CPA 93-091ZON 93-03/SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - liS y u a $ s " r 6 7 I [ 'E-".R 1~~1,1 . { - 3 ,f L x - y ~ta m'.° ' 'A'te _s z - ,.rc a,.~ 3k - C - f ~wY -.s fly, - _ s d i 12 - - - ~ - ~ - ~ - , ,'e - ~ , ~k~ t ~ 4,. i - _ - t I ~5 2 & 1 r i < E 6 r # t N 7 t r.A 'r R s 2 t w i" 1 - r~ rC - - - - F`s ,7, " , . , ~ ~ : , - - - - ~ ~ - -1 ; - 4- ~ ~ . . I ~ ~ ~ ~ il%V_11~ 1~ 11 1 _ _ - c_. 3 t _ _i _ .._s~ _ L .u _ ~ ''Y' 'J.o..~ _c- KV. _ .s " - _ . _ . 'F i 1 - -"r _..sI T..,_' {t sI- nk F L f - 6 "c.. 'ys _ VS , ~V h -.Y ~3 Vin w`c i - h 4 _ c~ f - - 4.~,x P V Y } T - K _ - - 5 Ssa,+ Y ` - ii..p_ ; 54,x,? -d- - e^s - - „ ,t+~?wF S - _.u.,.§=.s...:hce..s.F.g.J;ct:..kI,:u..ncssavYCCZ..:s _ ,•z- ,y+.x;~k, ' - 11-1 j+'--x }i- pay the fee in of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, -1 ~ ; Engineering Department. t s~ \'°'-may . - _ 9 7 - 4 - Fpj f P. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the improvement drawings. The 1 4, , ] - y - .,7 ? 3 plan shall conform to "Erosion Control Plans-Technical Guidance Handbook, November < , - c ~ ~ ~ r 1989. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. , ' 2~~ e z - . a , - , °q. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval L 4 z by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site or within ; "I . 4` the SW Northview Drive and SW Walnut Street right :vay. No c-miction vehicles r < or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. , ~ Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in t:3 f - - ` - the construction of the site improvements or buildings proposed by application, and shall F 11 ' _i include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. STAFF 4M, a < _ I CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. > , - r. As a further condition of approval, duly given prior notice(s) and a scheduled public ~ `v ~ ` 3,} ch:a,:"^.^v~;:;.:`I hearing(s) shall be given for any discretionary decision to allow change(s) in the >>tgxk,ln; b3c.:. approved application, such as for any discretionary decision to allow change(s) in the LI~ ; st = approved application, such as for future construction of an automobile access from the - , site to Northview Drive, or changes outside mere compliance with mandatory code i provisions and regulations affecting compliance with any condition of approval identified` 11W ~ -.1 " ¢ herein. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 3, 1 1 , + ti r - ` s. The applicant and all tenants of the shopping center shall restrict the use of mechanical . - F." ~'~W t ~ '1 parking lot sweepers, auxiliary generators, truck-loading activities and other similar # excessive noise generating activities to the hours of operation from 6:00 a .m. to 11:00 ` M_ i; It - , p.m. daily. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Department. t- _lr'a' ' ' a -j ' t. Windows shall be included in the grocery store facade facing SW Walnut Street by r,r _ including at least one window in each ba of the columned facade area (constituting not `s L£ r _ bay N ~x~5f r less than a total of four windows). STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning r ° Division. g ' a r g e 11 -1- -1 ms's u. The applicant shall provide a covered walkway in front of the grocery store, and in y , + r , t particular the entrance way: and the columned facade area may be used to serv e this >i. 4 - 1 purpose. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Department. ` d I l v. The applicant shall maintain a minimum of a five-foot wide unobstructed walkway ° r~ ' ~ area in front of the grocery store that is free of display materials or other pedestrian i ' F obstructions. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Department. J w. The driveway entrance at the southwestern comer of the site along SW Scholls Ferry k £ y a y Road shall be moved approximately eighteen (18) feet to the south to comply with p ~ 4 ~ Washington County standards for driveway alignments with the proposed driveway , [ LL T ~ < ` FINAL REMAND ORDER -CPA 93-09'ZON 93-03: SDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - ] 9 ' c - t s - rttt r t r _ -'i Jh 1 i I C l f T -1n C 5 k S431h 1! t ,T , I r _ - _ i 1'~. li:/ S - f ' ~ iy - - - - V J 9 - 5 ffis-_~, S f - - f / -4 h T i ..s_.. _ .i,.Y_r. ..ice _.1__'._,~___,_.._~i. - -1 ._Ir_ __~__s.u _ . r az - W 1,14 .r _ - - - - ` FG+x -a u Y - 1 r y u d d' ~ 3'^ ,5 t6 , L i, f - A k - f t' - ~°a ~ d-.1 S n .S - S 4 -'f f $F - f k 41 , dGS t«f «+C - _ - .1 I c t .t -`Y' - s - < r a---"T. t1 T~~: ' i~~ om'" ~ ,4; „ a~,~ - _ xa.~ar+a sr~z:~r~um W.___ f .yt- - I X, a r apt' r- k c P _ s _''u 4 ;R 3. rxta' < t `n "rte k ~T~ , 3 S{Eta ~ - r~ ~ 1, 48 ~~OZ5 , s` r' r access across from SW Scholis Ferry Road to the west. STAFF CONTACT: Mark t k - zqt ~yA 11} Roberts, Planning Division. • , ,L~ ikr;,..' 1- 11 I ~t r rep ~e f a i` r 5 # ~ ~9.i k ' f X. In the future the applicant may be required to provide an automobile driveway, in ` - ' ~ ,j accordance with the design specifications of the City's Engineering Department, for t Y _ L f t- X~ _ access to and from the parking lot to SW Northview Drive, as follows: i t j Y - ~ r - (1) The future driveway would be located south of the building pad situated near, s u ~ 11 1 1". r , , the intersection of SW Walnut and Northview Drive. - , M' - _ _ t ' s x r (2) The applicant will provide the City with a permanent easement for such V .1-, ~ - L ingress and egress prior to occupancy. ~ , ° $ ~ ~ 11 (3) The applicant will be responsible for payment of costs of construction of such t ~ -Y Z 1 3sa 4~ - 1 M J , $ ~ _ y driveway, if and when it is required to be constructed. 4 ; ` _ (4) The City may elect to require construction of such driveway access after duly A k in ;,x providing notice to all landowners within 250 feet of the site and conducting a s~ s - Lrt,k , . x'>fs~ ..k schedule public hearing for such decision. r , . _ ~ & - r - - f<'~ { r. _ f n v ice, ,a - x ~ ti . , y. The applicant shall obtain an Indirect Source Construction Permit to comply with the I x requirements of TCP Policy 4.1.1. In the event that the DEQ revises its regulations and F Py s ~ ~ ' t ~ - 'y standards so that the applicant is no longer required to obtain such a permit prior to r construction, the applicant shall provide the City with verification from the DEQ. 't - -.1 t a; 3. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: t " - 0 a' a A. Three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to ~x practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. ? z ~ - " r 1101 , rh , P v B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum k -1 j 4 standards set forth by the Oregon Revised (ORS 92.050), Washington County, y ~ z and by the City of Tigard. ~s ~1,- I S -x 4 .1 , ` , ii- 1. i r _ ¢ ~ xzi~- x {fir',W * i C. Copy of boundary survey. r - ' - - ' " STAFF CONTACT: John Hadley, Engineering De k k ~ 5 - F Department. t`~, S 7 ~ IX Y IlIF FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) SHOULD BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL OC ~r ~ - C q ,r P,4NGY PFR'L~iT• - ~ - i~ CU Z- 1. 3 T 4 Provide the En ineerin~r° g g Department with a recorded mylar copy of the final survey; , ~~ik% z I)- s, ' L 11 114, F y _ or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City of Tigard r r the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the , r,s , . copy. < - t & ' FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-091ZON 93-03JSDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 20 ~ , !F ,t ' rA 6 , nL' N s,s r~ F r -r.- xt - r s 1 I ] ~ ~g `r-i t x~ t v om., a > rte --.~~:'-T--. € _ # , } _ y ~ , ~ ~ iit~, I . _ . - , _ 1. - ! ~ J, 1~~ s# f M' is , S - ~v.r`N'h 'C+"'t 2 - - 'F'L k -`t'~ f x b~,{' cT 7 ~ , A _ - ~ 11 - M M", " r~~7s-~," " r r I I i . ~ - - - t 7 - 'Y.+3, i-y5 i .Y - Ali 2Ef ^.r~~.Ir ^^'p--,r ~rr"-n.e- -w...-J - ~ -.-;L;- I 'zfi lE' { 1 f h ! { - l 13+~' k? "~Y{ 5;4 = 1 t i - sr, -.~saT-,wb.•„i~„uw.>ve,2 d.: -_s`~.,..y - '-z s - k _ -'4 .x - - ~tts.r} ~,.5.~- a _ WT - ~ s` ~.~}z a°e .a - #''`*qS s - 'T'`~v r; 2 go A. ,~-t ah`, 8 aig Ngnim W_ Osg MOIR g~a D. RULING ON ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE r~ b 3 Opponents have submitted documents and a memorandum for admission into evidence at the City Council hearing on April 23, 1996. The Applicant in its rebuttal statement has objected rt to only the admission of evidence and testimony as to the size of Tax Lot 100's C-N designation t, r~ A {t f being allegedly 5 acres in size. The City Council has decided to admit all of the opponents'; - K evidence and testimony into the record. However, in reviewing this evidence and testimony, the ~s City Council has taken into consideration the arguments raised by the Applicant as to the weight s~, r y r r k and reliability that should be considered for this evidence- 41 V `M T T1 S J ,lam- - t. k"xY*".'.5 N-1< 3F .i1 x { 'fie - - J as`a- , 's x r 31 pr• Y~ Y { ~ _ - - ~+si~~~ .'Vi`m. ~ _ A' - - x fell 4~4~N ark ' ;V n `2 j g c, k'i't 3 t f r C Ei. - -00 i PEMM 551 x 3 { t. FINAL REMAND ORDER - CPA 93-091ZON 93-03iSDR 93-14 - ALBERTSON'S - 21 v M 7;7 777- iv_ _r _Vi fsgr p4P ; -Ye r?G Tf ~lE ~•i ,felt p~E - tl J 1 t ~ 8 RSi'.'3-4~Y.S ~3C} it r Y { - s t f „~y { - a- #yzT+' t A M, i., -71w 4 3 i ~ 3JI % _ , 71 r, i r `t t hytik _ .~y 9 - per. ~t b ij §.......+w....r.+-Sia.7rda+a-J'im¢FZe...G'3e mmb n.v.r...~._ .r~.e...a...~.s.-rr - 'S5"-,.~y~st ti`s `s ti 1Z q , AG19#DA•ITEmNo -x ..2- VISITORBeAf.?,g,N A DATE' Mgy14,9996- ~ q~~ (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) € r . _ . - ' '_-t '11°~~ ti Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear x `p f, from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your 'tN k T es. B k 1M j concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the . k FS" a n 71 } t rt , Y meeting. Thank you. » ~ 1 iY r r h', STAFF ` a,' tz ,a"F z r NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED 4 Y 9 y f 4L7 J 5-k.- E m s w-- k L rew.l -L /~~tTOL✓/ST M (/!.`/r.f- ~~a - LGS PIUfIP MA ~IOrg§~9'SW S"^ 1. 11 _ r~-Q rM^ ,tom r , Q .j i 5 ' ~C X krs'`,K r n 11 -11 - J 2 .f F R _~f* rs % r t C a ~s X ~ Wt k~.,~~',~_,~,, _,.""~F~.~~,'_~~,,-, ~ ,,i-4,,;"~qg~, -~,~J, a 3r3 s; l ;i u r r K~ R~ k ,Lys`" !j 4 ^z5,n°i e t r } s i- = 'max, c,'i'y_',ar - jet: , 7, , ~ s, T ~ 3 n f `X" jr F c5 C' - ~"r`-sr .,sza. ' E , - , ,-_-~',;IkZ,4~w,,~~,~~ ~,Ii,`--~X~-~~Q: "I I ~ 1 A~, , 4 t_" mamyot~F mnt.aa m r 1 k- 1 - 1.15 3 _ i f,.- `f , rrty,. P _ X r 2- ~-E ~_.E 9 N } lr 2 'y , ~,',~,.'~L~','i, ~ , ~V ~ ~ , 4, , " 1 'T. ',L 1A T' ,L' t-' `'sS-"a _ { a -a , ,err 14 Y',£k r # E", --r- k s T. 71 y -.V t 4 } ',r ! d r* } - - - ?.rte F ''S f~ k i': - _ S t -a' F- I S 7 Y xM1 skT`~ 's _l §tr+t'yf-S. mi-'~ - - ,a , z 7 a; E" - -,z r yrr- t _ _ of ,f a Y 4 a ~r v - - _.:_...~~c. _7_ ~i' "f'S_.~..-_ ~(u a~.u-_..-, , 4_~~ .~i Y..+....~.. - u......r ti f__ _ _ ~.~_.v_ i..-. r -y= -T, . ~_...v~.~~ -t....'i _ X xr - is .A`'`TM z . - _ - ` # . - - - a s, +r r-a1 T p-- ~ 7 a «F T'; tia&C.~d: s.i w"..~:s...=.:.... ..~:~..3 - ..,......-._,,.._......_...,_.„..........v.. t, xtt '1 ~ A.0 ~i-2 _ r L, 1 -M :M- s a ,Y L w+. - ' - het A~tt1i3A ITEAA IC c; "r", 2 a. VISITOR S'AGENDA =PAGE 2'DATE:°- =rvMaV 14 1996"_°`'-r r r , + ; i- ref ~r "fi C A IKP, . ~ (limited to 2 minutes or less, please) € r - z - i~i- yr,gds gc N ° E max „ x ~ Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to near V ~ j- x a from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your s ~ ; } ~ .1 concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the j . a . `z - meeting. Thank you. M ~ - ,=x STAFF '_s - I r NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED w s r w,> rya.,. V - " . x a . -_-..--'1 M~~ ~ -1 - I - .1 I T !L- 11 ~ Ma - uhf,. ~`H; - _ Gaiw4'=\:3`Y... I '..Y>t"` `12 4;'~ _ t Y r~ti ~k ~r . ~ ft r _ t. +t I 5{a d as i z }y 4`' t°~- d G _ g J - 't, -vc~St'25~ _ '111111-, 10 , 4V* 5 - y ,rf...-~~~ R ,y~~ c~~ Mj s`,;' s 1 r - § -;4 M # e „ Vi. F ~t3 £ t IRp i yt C { t --r F ,.y ,r•.v, a~,Y', ~e4 y ``'~`Zy,' 4 :r t r h ' ',~j1 Y f I 't' ,Ili- - t badmto\visitsht.doc M£_ z a " F -r lil 4sr~ ^ir a of _ E x Y 11 za,c=-+a *-L.........~...., 'r4's .l'rzx "'.s,_ --sr~ x 4 r. k x r - n &f` i e 5~ sfiz sw u _ g y t 3z'3 ~_"J~''-r7 ` t'~ e. _ rx,n. _ t~L ~ # r p. 7 fix, qtr . a ~ . y t+ r s a -d - e - _ - _ _ a W " - ~ - , i ~ ; ~ : , , ~ , - ~---ii j., , , " , ~ ! 11 : I -1 1~, ~ k a L 1. 3' . ,-I ~ M ~ ~ ~ -4~~,- -,,I- $5 , -it - " ,--,~,~,.,-"--~.'.,,,';,'-~-,~-*-,!",::~-~~,-~,~,-'~-~,-,:i~-~,~,-~"7 1-7 -11 ti ~ ttYx ,s x-t >Y~,+'P - r 1 t~ -r F'.~{r,~~; yr. "4. ts f1 .5yp t 3 - ? - w,:t Ait- - - R''zfa y I t sz4 P g , - - i~~, , I I.- I ~ LLMI: I : - ~ , -;I~ . ~ " I , - 'V -x ill, - X, 5Y- -~N~-, W-G. ~L 2 i Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of, , -4~ a~ _ ~h r %time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may VN the Council to supplement ' - ° + +A '3''~ further limit time if necessary. comments are always appreciated by " ,~h~ . oral testimony. A U._.a:'ir:'-"l ,DATE `Xfd04~=1994"" 5 x *5, 1 Y . 4 ~39 { d CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - ALBERTSON'S INC./DUNCOMBE $ ` ~ Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) Remand - Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 93- ~ ~ - :t " 0009/Zone Change (ZON) 93-0003; Site Development Review (SDR) 93-0014/Minor Land Partition xa~ F ~ z M- -Qi3 er (MLY) 93 c 3 3~ n l , a~ Ox .r` ck r.~ i~I - I PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS K b Y t i Yrz+ tr n 2 , OL t s- ~ ; ` t _ d yak as§X t j 1 ry ;mod z}_ i c . ~ a A - j -UF -'3 's a Sony 3y a4 z~ r tr tom- - t , Et^x Flt 1 ^Z p3 p +-s .t 4 6 '4- a,,, s~f R x x r .F > ' - ' ta-tom"-s-47~;~:' o- _ ' , - 7 Y{F tom} ~ z5 10161 ~ - q F 3 T x - e { uk,, fin" , p ,"'d "t .h ~r'+_ - t 's.- - es c+ r r-r-r- 3 K,FrtJ'ct'-+v x~T^'~`y t rh .fit c T .r a - , - -2 ,J , r 'f °4 y , 3 pct y r c .max-,t+t r y~~i x y J ' ~St.4 x~ J 0f r > ins 4 5 w''M'y - t - x - Itn - aRA# ~t`'s-S,-ti i L ,I r°°2-~ ~K 1Y,S 3 2 3 1 T M - S7 f+., 'A Fah 'rt' v~,4 -YT - G- f ~{c"}yF y~` J +s .y 4 ,~`4 yak `z i, ~ r r t x , - _ i __"~_r ~LL .~1_~. -t ~'_t.r~_ _.~x._.._.~-~_... -..r xy.~_J_,._ ~,..r ._c-_.-.-- ~,L i.._. x~__~.__r. ~ .ter v- ___.._t-.. a_--~~ ' s z ~ ke ,kg's-rk -s* - <-f _ - _ Z~ ~e - _ - t~5 ;fir' - ,s- r. t - - - - t ' ~l - - ,l - ~F , - , - k _ - x _ ms'``s I I- r I .1 -1 ~IVI "r i - -1 r _ k ' ~~+I-~ - . y 1-1 'li % -5 ~ . z.. E ~ NQ ems;-- - , sue- f r cam' - - w a_ - Pi.F.ASF. PRINT r { `Y l~ Went - (Speaking Against s°r x , Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent ) g. ` ~ T; M ' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. , ~3 - rat s' a* - _ t`rCvy G. ~l~; ~l r r 4iw P 6x g I ? 9 k ~j hf f~l W - `J1foNKWit.e. fL (024-6*7 1 Z-F 71 ~"t"4 t s _ F~ 3i.- - s es„ ;r , Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ; w _ =t k~ r:,,'' 11, - s, 11-1 . h w } ' Ysrg-. r'~ i k Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 4 t 5 3d7is t 3s < -`?~RNT~.¢- tea. . s K a Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 3 x `a a xt- 3 4 tp''z' M Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - G,- , , " v r { ro u V. u ` - Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 4 , ~ - 1 - ,-s' 113 r "id~ c,F > -r -r r r t 7, r ~ ~ R 3 ; _ C, , ?d 7 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. s i -.S Y, a _ q t 5 s " t-fir . `iF P, _ i i ~ r Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - . ' A x at s - " s~.,` x K Y r'° _ i r 3 wvt~. I . r S Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. r 1 a ~ 's y { - _ } a ~ gg s r - c i l 4 - X fi k -t- - 5 _ - ' , v r r zti _ 1 { - z ti-* " K 'n r °5 a x ~ t~ d" - ~'~x asti- r - t n-a, -N kiz t r- v i r s. 1'~I 11 r Z a , ~ , , I ~ , _ , E i k'e'^.~-^v~.-~.n .;.r-e-aT..~m~-a--va.~~.-._z~.a-~-..~.~.~-..-.m~.Y~'. ~n'.~.-~~i•.'~.'i".'r-^-'^ _-^'^.T^w.la~ ~^^„".'~~er~.x -mm-s^--~-~ea~•r..^!r-t^~ _ 4 - } A x - } _ - } - - F 1 1 _ _ _ - J 'm. p ib - } a 5*1 - -':'."~'--~q~. ---j~.'---'-'~04- i~ : #s - : .y,- v~'x x z c ,yr- i s .~J 11 .,3 c'RptSy `F.,.¢t"F -Z!,-'~' - -5 - k `h 1- .~.i - X lit R '}y L Z Jt; - - 'T ; 33.` - 'm PW - er. Wi~t ; -t-, -j !t k " „ 7 ,y s -star '~e f-- 'n ` ` ~ri ' `11 - Vitt- k~}'ti.'-'4", , ~s - %M Proponent (Speaking in Favor) Opponent (Speaking Against) V_ Y~ max- - Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ~ S' - tk"- -rya - -l f - o r i _ W- ' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. R~ ; v tw I All, I f - ~ 1 { I Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ~ - - Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ; s^~i 3 C-- 4Rtl 11 r Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 3~>M § f ~ 1~ M' " r s s h ~ E - , Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ? m~ K n £`3'^v S ~i~ t `-tom. M - = Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. i*'# L. - r _ { a i~~y 'i.F" I s ~f a I- .1 r PN i t - ! t 3 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. A'- k, r' ,,l-",., . v~k 11, - ryt u-- `'cr `k V13. 4. 't . 1 k -"P ~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. `'p _ y. Y'J .T not f0` i 'J'VL`"bT 9 1 k', x' i F ; {„'y ` 1. 1. I 11 Y AEA r ~ `~s rz ' ddm\jo\testify.doe '"^-°'"=e h' f,- "'l O' r , , x ,N „r~ aka -1~^, a4 t k $ a y -!.4` } a - - fi - - >.^^^**+...~-,wn:,~ ""a~~`f;, N w'rzg .,•'.,,+,<2.zz,--u*aa - _ ~-m,.ws , - a -r y~- ) ~ _ "f - Yom. F 'n,-'~ 3 _ - , ~ , ---~%~~i A. - - 4 - 3 a ° ..rf a} Lx ~ € rtcfi4 e, TMati jJ - t - _ "'x 'a3 -r r p „1 ~S 7F fez 2y f +s.t3 .`,gF.mq.'..w3,' ` a k a ri L y y t Y 1 : - ~ ,',"L" ,,,,,,"-,'-'..-.r'..,,,,*'- 9 _ .`_zt~~~._ .~.a .rte. ....T- ....4. i - _ y r _ - t sMook'- t~ i t u - P' _ 4 L - - _ ? t tie r.. ^Ny a;i£~;~ afi ~ - 'FS~,°i;x,N 2 2' ^'r t y - t ,s $ k - ya...t. tY ~..7„- x - S R 'Ag Q ` ' - tit - u,,, ~ ' it ~ti ; k tai j - - _ t + y`z'~,U, gi:-,.-'"'a"w_d n~- 3 Nr ~ r % " r~ti£~ _ Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of 1; E Ka 3x time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may s0 n s } further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement , y - 11 19 N z oral testimony. _1 _sF }r~~ F , y4F r'te'=' ..,~It , w_ I, 1X 1t ~ e k AGE 4P ~,~!'E~` TWNQ;~'-? -N V--,:,`--DATE,;7', P#~W~~L-.:~'7~M..::.'..~.. ~ r 4,~a~'•' ~a ~ ~ -1 i '.s.., ....m~.:.s a ' 1~ y b~ s:~:.~<r..~.,~,^e....A.a.-,... t 'u rt r` ' d na,> "k "t PUBLIC HEARING (LEGISLATIVE) - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA) 96-0003- DEDICATION, - mw RESERVATIONAND IMPACT S1 UDYREQUIR~ :'E S W f r F K Ciry of Tigard proposes amendments to the Community Development Code Sections I& 32.050 V t4 ~ B.S, 18.32.250 E.2, 18.96.010 A. and 18.96.100 A. and B. to require impact study, reservation and a 3 dedication requirements for public facilities and services. LOCATION: City Wide. ZONE: NIA. - x r . ' APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 11 and 12; Tigard `w f ~ - ' IN . 7f_-?_ : Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1 a., 2.1.1, 2.L3, 3, land 8, Community Development Code r „ .sue; h. v<„ ='t%~:~;' Chapter 18.30. 'r" ''°r' ' " ':fi ) Y n, s . ix _3 F - ca5 a fir. ~ ; 1 _ Y r _ ~ - PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS v t ~t__ E t v 'w i { ' E _ 5r~ ~Fk, ,'S'4 t - - t t E ,zi y ~3 ' ~ ' t* I~ v s,. y t i I r 9~y4}~~ " ors IAT' 7i t' ~ _ _ r t - r I "M I- -1 1. I t~' f~S' t 9 'kk'J i~ Fi'r', s: F r t - P - j ~z,nTa ~ l="nf q Ir z q deli " ,.FF _ d' j*"7w~"m" 7 ~ k i. , ~ ~ 1 _-x - 3n 't°~9... de r - a i mgg r H ~ .'g j ,t t=--,„r 4 A - f • M 1. c~t"s t fi.' [ J h rm✓L sebn`E• Y , ~ "-"'~;--~~'~~!--t 5f~',' , Rt~~ " - ~ j - -'Z I E ~ , " "-w- I- T.' y 3 1. 1 fern .k F f5 E' y.~ss _ , , 11 S~`z'i>`~,b, f S•"" k Y `F J~L r .1 k t-. i 3 4"~s 6 4F~ Prrr 4 4- - f tr,"i,'F l J ~,s .r' -xr z - - c -,.tr _ m'a _ 11'. R ~S- t F 'L - f - 3 }F Y i- _ < yaa _ _ - r k 4 _ § j z t"r„~, ~9,--" r._e...,_'___~T^-~~ c--..--.ter i"`.' - s_ -4.. ~ i z €x f a #s r kJ a~ Yl- Vt' 4 - r' 3 r o-s Mgt PLEASF PRINT Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) x•, w~ Tf } as+" ai Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and P ne NO. rti ~9~v Jr~ L!/, gL~✓~dzZflt Zvi, s z s Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Ad ress and Phone No. r _4g' ` } fJ 5 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.~?q} 4 _ y Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. s~ r x~ r r r' ;;f S M~~`atif 8 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. WWA ! : u* -,sue c , Y' ,#y, - - - Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ss_ F~ f { Y s Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. a i t ~~r 7 r { t V 4Z P Rx rim c'~: tt s tee. r Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 3 ¢ t N~ R, a XA~ t e V d 5 ~Yt ..r`eu"y ,~.c. f sY3 v _ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 2 p a H -'-M01 r t. _ a ~1 et ~ J: 1 77 717* 711 3 P 'X, {tea,, a _t _ 4°p ti'8 4 j x 6 _ t _ 1 i, k F -J s a F L+~^....nn~,..-~n...nwR..w.......-.+T-.~.~~.e~x-+m~n.wr'•+ ~-t.~._ 7.~~-~_l~~-.--.__tTr.[.~'~<.ltT?[Si'~._~.~ h - ,r"~~~v^~TS./.,'~`_"r_r'.~! ~.n.€_ ms's '1 •i}~Sv'a~ai A 's. i` t S - _ - - ?aµ~Y F`".'` .a•:' Krt fi T eaf 7 -„r as 3 - .`...w....,.. - _ 1" s Qom" x~ 1 TFrtc~ t & xc - Mll~ M. Ull -Wr n, "i Proponent (Speaking in Favor) Opponent (Speaking Against) x e ta.z Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. z s 2 ~ St 177 , Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Add ress and Phone No. t. f y "myx, cYr r~- Ali ~~Sx. uC_ :F~b ry Name, Address and Phone No. r. ~`,jP$ h Name, Address and Phone No. x N. n4 7 Name, Address and Phone No. ~ - Name, Address and Phone No. r yi ~h g'-% wg ins ~-gRMs 3 r * 5 b N .r•` p roaS f Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.a usw 1 t+ 41 rk J \ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. U-IM -K TV-44-MMEM h Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.V t9O OM { Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. f s r r ~3T v Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No.~ Zf- t aM#F7 x.rg f}~ w s ' st.cJ 1,>; z ~a{^~'`,~r E ON, p, x7 -1 1'' Nog yt t #ta~r *rf f f - - r y3 r-,~-- e3NV ~f r ' r tct G-- -Y' w tr P r P- a F b3 f 1 4F- '3" 14 R", izZ T I - - i ~"lv,. •r~._ ~,~_~R.~S air 4'."a~ 4~ ~.~~,1~ - . ~ ...e ~ i.. ~ ~ ~~t_ ~ _e~.s t _a.~i....~.~ _ ~ ...~v_ v _ . Y.. . T.L i .i.. _c- ~ _ ~ r . _ _ _ zxS,_}v.i~ T g Y ~ -yam x _ _ i - a ~ 'x" % +-.y - Y - 3 }7 2 tb }y„ J~ _ ,gip,. r1 C 3 nc,r'K1 5^ a _ - - - t - i dz ~5 - r pit .r' ' 94 0 ; wra..' .r 'a:M1:a. - r i-~ _ _ - -xr °..a..cr „fw,M M ~ri t ~ _ h "k'b x vt 2 44 WA P, . t-R r Depending on the number of person wishing to testifY. Y the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of r s~ , -`s k time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may s--~ ' `'r [Y Y=l: further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement ~ 's N n. t r ~ „ oral testimony. _ z z ~ _k a _ AGiI I5T0 g, DA9 . k 14 ~ w2 - 41 , _.g PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET v,4 ~ I s - ~5 To discuss a proposed supplemental budget for 1995/96. The first notice of the supplemental r4 ti M budget hearing and financial summary was published in the Oregonian on Tuesday, April 30, ?ah. ~ x y} 1996. A copy of the proposed supplemental budget document may be inspected or obtained at ~ e r 1 - 1, ' 3 X Tigard City Hall between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. = a, - A 1 10 ..r. 1 i 4`t -may y - PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS ~ = w,. - a 3 - mss, I -2, -1 r111 ? i- - , s ry. u~u 7 I - ~ " £ I I k ' -fit U%%, a ~ F r 4, ' if 11 ,I I -mss ~S ttm'C i . 73s^ -11 . t 1q, _L 7t -~jr C z., .si, .7s ~ 1 L - vtq - - 9 ~ MY 2' § y u ,~Y1{,%}: 4 m 1 ' ni t'i°'y~-+S,":4''i- °r nrcrose:%t^^'^ '-t _ 1 , A=5(",L` , 4 yi x -~qi r, p - p-,r, 3. "'5 P" Shy { 'S :I II 1. _ JJ"f ~v - _ S - 3. g `h ~ Sr~,~ °a pG a n r - _ S3A``5 "vim-' j'~_e~' 7" J .t, y,,,~,.:r' c -k 7 - wC r 'rs t W+ 11 - d q Y S-S' ,e9 - ''3 , , , h~~ P AA ~ r der E < s s E - , M . , J" ~ , I",' " , . _ - I -I.." ~ ~ - , ~ , 1 ¢ y _ tF - - S' r7 ~ tt ''r'^ - f ~ .;,2_ ~ - - 1---f ~~~som-wnr _ a,~•xL v.."1"T/~~~,..~,.r - 5... - t yam.- - . -.__J LL c... .._3- tL. ~D_.._ _L ,cS_, tL .a, F_:-. r .r[ .c _ - vc > x a IKR 4 } - f t Y a tint - r - t x - 4 a t L' 7s - y'r s { s `fi U-g 'my~~"Y Cx 1'fi q.Y, t•_ , - p _ ' g ~ - - Jts T''a a 4.i ~ _ fix rt, r- - -S ' Yi, if ,''may'-'- F},'.,`~,Y .4r, uL:t - «:r~? ` :a.?:s~:F'+i° "''(~i' . ° ~,,{5s i mt i rJ•, i 1 `s S J S}, - - r, 1 - R~L 4-..1£ "i .F Y h 3 .1f A~ fti[ W., t~ { _ y F, i Y3.1~. v3 - PLEASE PRIM r: a ~°~rkd~~5 6 `r - J' ,r' 3 Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) .Y ?3 µJ' T ; _ ` Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ` s x 3 K, r, y 5 r, 'alt' fk, - r' ; ~u'Y;, s S s ; Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ;F, " ` ~z of0'• 1-i '-1 _ ;yam - - k V r ' Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. e r y a?~ 'r~ 7 fia e - I Sty } - a < Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. s x Name, Address and Phone o. Name, Address and Phone No. - , , y f3 - 1 t zti4Yc a tom', t. - Y~ z Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. rc~ r ti w1 K ~ a 4 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. w rs ep t ~N , x t _s ' x a; E f z'y~ 3 i~-*- a sn `ki'k at > Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. v ` y «f Name, 7777 7d Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 3 € 3-' b- 7 ~ g vL, r I i, Yy, rr7 G S p.~ -e'er.. - 13 ,4 - L F' 7 "sr~r- P11 ' t 3 - - e y . s ;'a`te ¢s a,,i - - z# x "t h7 K x § r Lv'# , `.~,vsd ~"t L ~ 1 Yrr§ } iX - Sr T'- .z i - tg Y X'"}e`it' k,t A 'Q yr' 1~xg f - I{ 4S'{'y Tt- - ' ~ _ - T _ _ R yf - - _ _ ) IL - J -..+rr~•---'~-.-r _ +C~ •+'R"4° ~.IT~.°-°'~[ t ....,_.'.a.-n..~ti`~~- Z~aI'. `.ve^m.- - ^`:...~,.'.r a-~--- . - } h - - - - - - - 1 s 3 t r- } m .3.vL - i - S.. - Tc 3" RL.,•zr a` 4 8 S MA X~ . - im-- F 11 -M :ic'-s "mot - 3 s' i ~IM tl~rx''t C F tkt }c t!, G - 4Ct,~e tt k - ' ' Proponent (Speaking in Favor) Opponent (Speaking Against) } R s tJ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. m~ t N zap g' w ` rL. x x3 , { _ y` Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. ,5- - - a i3o x a t z L^ ~ $ z x ' Y wrC R.- yxt ~Xi ;sk Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No, ' a r l r 4 ' V _ s ' S ~ 4,'i" a { k s I = Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - , t~~ t` { k 'a" 1 S £ l 4 4 {{j33 fit} f Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. s ' G ' ~ ' -11 ~ ` 3 j..h""'3.L ' ~t -11 " i 4 d - 'z... . i s s _ cue c 3~" c b? Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. - 1 ~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. . 3' W"." . r f "dv'. `F , , ay, S Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. -1. Y i ~ ) f a s s t Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. _ 5 , - _ '~5 fir'`'' Fr s;r t - ~ R t } - - i ! --5 i r. - 1-f i - i:\ dmljo\testity.doc - f 1 i S v,r 4.b L - " .~.n."w',3 $ - -3 ✓asl.~Ulw'.s s" i L. e , v~ ? - }a d 'T 1~ C I -fix' 7 ~>F 5 e , _ ' ' 'Fl r 73'9=sa+.. ~w+:.+:..~•+ - - -s•.l £ '3. ~ ~ [ e --k- etc - , F M' - ? s`,i t '44 'P'i 4 5' i - g t W a 4 ~ L- v 4 7 t l - - x i.~ z a- pmt' rd _ S. ~.Afi F - _ 3' P I 1 .5 J i i t r Y - } - 11 - ~ T~ IBM , ~ - - - - " , , _ ~ , , .Y',',' ' t s-Y- - - - - s - - 0- , -1 - , - i ,I- I ~ tx S7s - - -s F- C` ~ii --I' "'`fi'n. 2' ~ - ~ .n. - - 6. , RICHARD E. RAGLAND, AIA i ,rte"' 11 - ARCHITECTS O PLANNERS _ ~..s f - xI- A z - 4' n s . c+u a o a t fix _ 5 Agenda Item No. Y n ' r ` MEMORANDUM fi ti Meeting of W (q foaY a _ ' ✓ x TO John Acker r _ s ~x ar City of Tigard r eh } z - 4 FROM. Dick Ragland SUBJECT: City Hall Re-roof project ` - t' fi i e_ DATE: May 2, 1996 ""i 'j - 32 x r ~ J fi i e _ The enclosed are Schematic Design documents for the re-roof project. 1 have shown two options for f + ,111 , g L m a , r - review. Option 1 is a metal roof over wood framing that would cover the entire roof area. As t X"~ ,yL t a x ; mentioned on the phone, this will require a dry fire sprinkler system be installed under the roof to meet gg, building codes. Option 2 is a single ply roof membrane over wood sleepers, with a metal roof on wood d' r -11 . framing at the mechanical well. The mechanical well would also need to be fire sprinkled. A less ~ a ? ,~,r..fr, , „ costly third option would be similar to Option 2, but not installing the wood sleepers for positive 1 , - r"' _ . Z 4 drainage. The single-ply roof system can be warranted for dead flat conditions like that existing there 3 rt s now. While it is possible to get a relatively goad system this way, t feel more comfortable with a ~ i positive sloped system. s , - I will be ready to review the enclosed in more detail at the May 14th meeting. If you have any r o to ~a w _ uestions, lease call. t °ia; F } ~ 1-1 - r ~ F 1 . 11 r ?.r`° -rte; 111 "I I L, { - ~_a2 5` a w .w' a,.r a s'? - 71'i . A 2' u 1 ' s ~r'z € t 3 , If S " 4s 5 ~N; ws t -'r 'W % P - " 4kiF Y 2u' [ J x " ; z t `G- 7,-.r a- 1. '~Y r ✓g X tw fi h . _'11 L l - _ * 5 Y ^ _ r....,r. z ,sue . s _ H. A 9 I~ 1 4: N- 1 4 r „:y'O'. ; :r.i ,'A , , . StO NW Third AVe. Portland,OR 97209, 503t223-6725 t' w r ; e ~ _ f fl t '_t tr r ' - - ' Mr, = e.,..i„ a.M ..',tr' _ r --r° -i~~ P` k -i •F p - C s R _-t-' - s E jj~~~„ ;F _c a t 1 - , r7 X .3 7 S t t .7 _ a y~ t,t,r isL'~ r - tk-, - -1f'-'.j,',;, 5 - _ _ 1 S 1 E ~y s c 7 t" tyY i -'1 risr Z it=~i, _sv~.~..,~r_~l.__a _ ~t-,.-~__ _r_v. =,E:4 1~~ .-.,s= __~...__s ~s.c~. a._. _ti._._ 1 _r_._>~ I_ r- °vs s`-x , - - r~X6,i;Fx e sY +x - c $t ¢~'s ~ >3 mac' b q t,~ e - ~K y _ y's Pte--' - - 4n ~ .'E=f _ it T> 'r{ cF ? "a y - l t - t : - 1 ya i, -AP 'A r ,ate r u ,gs~'''F4f 2 , - ^tl7E',.a! k*,3.C`t+~r' a ' '"s'`SSa<a'Uxizi'Ya€vym:.,u53a •''~s mm _0 . 'N 7 F ^N a 0 air at y r, t ~~Fk f + c I __1 ~h DATE; Apii 26, 1996 c { n _ s 3 f: - 'ya t-}"s't , ~ t$'.(at,;^- F i s PROJECT: Tigard City Hall, Tigard, Oregon d 11 s r - _ ~ ' ~ . 3 SUBJECT: Estimated Costs for Re-roofin With Y` 'f ' r g Melnl & Sloped Framing ' . >c' 4? I'll ' ~ i '-1-i n k' < Remove gravel, repave for framing (6500sf @ .15/sf = $975) + allowance $1325 = $2300 * $ _ : 'st , a Framing for sloped roof: W's @ 24"oc, 5/8" ply'wd, block'g: 7600 sf @ $2.25lsf = $17,100 k} - Framing attachment to wood deck for up lift, allowance $1500 s~ b Corrugated plastic roofing over mechanical area: 1344 sf @ $2/sf = $2688 ~ ;"l W ~ f a~~ ~ 5ti x~ r 1 Metal standing rib roofing system (snap lock), felts: 6500 sf @ $51sf = $32,500 , 3ti~~~ ~ fi a Venting and gable louver for mechanical allowance = $2300 f . , Electrical allowance @ $250 5'~' ' { ~ Gutter at west edge and east area 168 If @ $7/If = $1176 , 0 x = Drywel I (1) for new gutters located at SW bldg. corner. allowance = $1500 ,.r ~ Nl £y~. t g a On, h~,~-' ~ Mechanical penetrations, allowance $350 , , ' : Miscellaneous routing for conduits, etc. allowance $500 -Z:- , Yom" n. - - a - Perimeter cap flashing, west, south, east: 373 If @ $9/If = $3357 . y,, ' 5 Wall regledflashing at north and east: 2561f @ $7/If = $1792 ;~t"~ " ~ x t Fire sprinklers, dry system @ $2/sf x 7600 sf = $15,200 > Touch-up painting and patching at parapet and walls: allowance = $1500 ~ 2" € r - Repair lawn and landscaping for drywell and construction: allowance = $500 ' ' y '~l } - Sub Total: $84,513 x.11 _ -t I 1- -11 r k- s-~ ) t y a '4" a- OH & P @ IS%: $12,677 m r a Cont. @ 10%: $9,719 . r rrrrrr ~ ~ x r - . _ s~s - TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $106,909 rr-" t t x r - - pf ¢ r - ~ k 1 *Add for tear-off roofing plies to insulation board 6500sf @ .85/sf = $5525 **Assumes adequate fire line water supply since bldg. was designed for second floor. ,r I _1 _Q ~ & r v 4 j 1 _h-~ 1t. $ 'i - :a''',. '4a YY?fie a-s .t*~ w. - ~ y - s, ~Ff a t 'v " y e fi't' ; 3 F C r S R. - F r a_ Matteson Architects 510 N.W. Third Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 224-614- s xt _ f••-=- "{TSI'- r5 'IH t P - - F"i " , f:d iie'f f' t;- 4 ,h--- t - t _ _ r-,e Yf ~yy"-', e I -J 7 „R - r xi _ , y,C L 3i f~ 'C~ frs -fL a t,~ "'9 ,s~.^-r ,3""„` -Y k t _ ..aka r - y } 'i ~ -x -1 4~° 5' '74 S fix. "'.w 'r 1 Y _ ' - - - r b .a•,' ✓ Ya$v i"e^ E ~ , rEk:^.^M1,§ $ 4-k. r Y _ ` : t?"- 1-A' - rj}'`d.n YY dZ b+ 'E,~£.P.r 1 C- y 1 5 S € € Ic t! z1r.`x =`,._:TS 'cr*5.`°_ _ S.rF; _ t ,a,y",%, ` L d Y V yo- - y s t b:^ - I I'll- y3' rem zau- S. ~ ri - - c - a - F 6t'z' - i I i~';f ~M - 3 1~ } - - - - - - _ a:- .n~ - tt 'ems„, ~ IIIII _ -~~i 2 - ' ~ " ~ ~.rd t_-Y f ~ NA a il `.1,11 t .,.R--`CST- :;,^-iY Rv W.~ k Y 2 ' + Sia . '~l DATE: April 26, 1996 s PROJECT: Tigard City Hall, Tigard, Oregon - Y ' Y # I SUBJECT: Estimated Costs for Re-roofing with Sinele Ply vct m & Sloped Framing -?11 . - ~ ~ a 4x 2 - - 4y ?b+s t J s, 'S § -s Mechanical Area $25,205 ' a r { - , Roof, wood framed, 4:12 pitch: 1344sf @ $12/sf = $16,128 " - - Corrigated plastic roofing: 1344 sf @ $21sf = $2688°'~ 6b xx Y$ t~ r Gable end louvers, weather blade and bird screen: 88 sf @ $15/sf = $1320 , e I x~ 7 Electrical allowance @ $250 V ~i " ~ Gutter and flashing at mechanical perimeter. 1171f @ $7/If = $819 ' _ ' ; Fire sprinklers, anti-freeze type, allowance = $4000 t( -%0 - t S n EC . 3F`r5. Flat Roof Area $50,127 ~ 4 ~ ~ - I I 1-1 Remove gravel, prepare for framing (6500sf @ .15/sf = $975), allowance $1325 = $2300*~ ' Framing for sloped area: 2x10's @ 24"oc, 5/8 plywood: 6500sf @ $2.25/sf = $14,625 - - Framing attachment to wood deck, allowance $1500 ,w i , Blow-in insulation, avg. 5" thick., 6500 sf @ .27/sf = $1750 ~ U Perimeter wall flashing (salvage wall cap); 4281f @ $9/lf = $3852 ! s 4 ' # € Mechanical penetrations, allowance $350 ' :t - t r r Miscellaneous conduits, etc. allowance $1000 - xI s " z New single ply roofing system (Hypalon w/'Dens Deck' sheet): 6500sf @ $3.50/sf = $22,750n2 ° _ Y Touch-up painting and patching at parapet and walls: allowance = $1500 ~ ~i~~ rrr -4 F' Repair lawn and landscaping for construction damage: allowance = $500 ' - ~ 11 11 - - Sub Total: $75.332x - A . : M. * ~ ~ r.~ f- OH & P @ 15%n: $11.300r Cont @ 10%: $8,663 r:"~; { i 11 - ? i $f TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $95,295 't rr, x + rt sir-'r'~r i r, r W a Q r ' *Add for tear-off roofing plies to insulation board 6500sf @ .85/sf = $5525 ' R' ~ '4' ' d if)11 4 -t.' y - YL ^°#'fr Y - _ 2. 1 -v ,3, t +t emu- - { i fi -i - eYx .k 55 - - 5"s rx f lI Matteson Architects 510 N.W. Third Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 2246145 ' E. " I{ _ h.y' a sx"} L - P - -'~z"--r~` F -'E fi -x- l ' a 'd "t ".r ~ " Ii-.. w x` r 'Cl_', r r a,~ a WW F r - e. r ae 3`q.s ^rf:-~- 6 '„j § d . .,3-•.f' a-t- :r_•-~»w ~..~.p....e s, - _ `,-{sF d~`~.ay X - i L -g _ ~ -T ~ s i pd+ spa` ' k pt ~ 1 e k r , ' . '~'.a" ELM b - r 8 i .ate 9 N ' 11 ~ ryS-lt- A r 44 , -'"„,P -o - ,~f" e _ - tai - F ~ 4t r°~ sit - - - - - - - Y 'F'i' '7 s - _ - - 7 y -Y _ - ~ . ~ - I , I I 11 - I I F~- I I 1111111111~ ~ 6 - _ r r r -a, rcr^ s ~ t~''s~' ,P r>+ n P' :YY t a," ro~ µa '42 -441 k G, x S t. 5 ril,,, . rl ::.dr%, w an xnL F ~ w..i . . fi tt W`- _ I, ,~.,t 4^y".~.., . ~ 4, ~ "S' : k•ry'4nr• ,r zt+~ t, t, t? tN.(,y iN. 4 F t = zr;• s d',. s it,; x{ 'r I . ' r «,i s. ',n 't>.. ~'.x,'=, Sfac .`.e v!t '"L v.5x ..5,~,a-, 1:...: •{,r,r~, , ,t _ s K 5 -S+,• x,+ih° ':.1 . L bf.£ :,A+~# aA: ;.j, m,~ 'r~; r~~w -'i`+ r tiff, ,5 ' yrv,. t yr. r. F..a u-0~~ kf" 4r•.7` -.t- tie;rt {S A^ 4.. PirX ''fa, rnbr "M.,", . r, a> a ~ t,+ , ha t.V d' , aR , 3 J aM1i' r t.. Fyu„' 41 iY err i F ty f}i l -y =Px .i,Fh ,is 4 . k . - -.d F J :ha 'Sr LYR" .t ; p V I v J • ~ P. • 9a 3 An ,fit, . ~ 7•`C~ Abl M Al' 1• nt - 2^ t ` F ! C T •u~~ t•" ,x 'JUa e:,.,e: rr F~' L~ . a ! I + R aJ ` 'a .S tl ~Y ~S"f kt~g~,d~ •1£`a~"~k{~f>'~?!'s € _'+t` y M1 i,-s fa 1 `A,tadir]r: 4 !r - f l F ~ + I I I I i I t: R }#1 tr' i Lr' F .k 41 I I I I I I 9 r r. r I I I I I I J } It 4 - tt I i = {{,tt~ ~ ~1 ate` 4 + y' t, x Y. s +s i n j I I cc LLtz3w TIP= I I $Oa .,4 UCH j 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - I n I ~ j I I y~ ® I I I j i 1 4 I I 1 I PARTIALROCP4,. PLAN kt~ } a'. .r.o PAHf1AL ROOFPIAN 1 { rka t c{• 2 S df {J - 1 i k~' ~s Al rAti4N,",rxu^ ~,mvxr+T-w"u•°hT '<t } ~ S.e ' T fi 7 FJR° rY F.,- i . ti•L, fi`Yi '`S:'. _ C 1 „n• -l 1 : f J'.t 'N .r' a ~ ,.>.w. i ..r, ,.t 1..,, t ,mot, n'•> .',i ^ I, «-p'it. xr{., F.•^, :a~ r.w.`,';.`s"^4 ,rE - .~J:'~;,ris"n;' a.4 Z } ~ l q4' .:F6e ~>Fa 55~~,, prk + 'i .ta~`e." x 2 P'M 'S: ri { , ,1 , •x"{,~:~:a2.. - X '!i ^ pt~ t Y d I , ry„ a - S'tN,.r•- a".,5+".v ,'.FS - C ! V-"1 t'~~~:? -~~I~ u.P u'.. gM1rf,~ '.SCm R 91 '4! f fi ..+y )'x RE' '.4, ex •a P; vv't: Y.,, W". ~ h .Cr. a^x .l, ''.S, ug:., ar~v^"T~ •y./., rya^, a - .wi 5 ~ yy •4 l a ^t~` ^r I-. ''".i.,, 1 7 z^v, n.• -t 'va, -71....`t a lair. 'i rx"^ t . S tai: "',i:` n`., n+''x rl • . i' R ti n, n' w%;.." tirr , rwwrv `4 ;r:.,:,. -i S' a~x fi. as '"'M' • HI" $ -t l r ?e h i 1' 2.~ +I." ~,~''.t~ `"r$.: ~,M1 Ire . . } ~I r Pd . {>'.~t J,~`'nr. , :-,1"'. 1. '=,'Y,in,'st:4s?,"' a'+ki R,.p,^r .?'8, ,,y~y,. .c}•~ ~ . " P . ,.,.y. ,.,y n'V,i 4 ^.'ii}':. .f - df.'s. t , ,tV 4 `A « j ~..r yd +.y r,:.,,et,u rl x~ ,"4( ~r+$N, a 3` Fr•. Y. k t'F"(+~ u~^,b^ ,B^ :Y e~~Ln,'A .Yd„ ..u ."n..,.,, x,. , M ,-t 5. F . a,.v a..a$. sy'oF , :T. Er•A -ra u.x`' a•. !x*`;n ~ia:* `i~ ?r. ",d.'~s:i(,~ .>u a.q,,: ct',"d ».'a 'ar ..'r~• , :7' 4. s r t , ,v rv' ,4~ V w''~ x. eI `4 ~`G,. 'P~ ;::K '+"'.t'o;,- ,,e +'~.*.?.,",x,pp. .fi„i±` t"t r+' ";pyr(,>, >a , ~.a-.a~ •"-RY`' 4 ,rr. 9 'w7: .P,~ $ k `:7,.. "'yn,.;.:,, 3 ~s "`-a - 3 ,f" .,fir <rs„~a, .A,~.s' .i~., ,r` :rv' .,.-r` _ t,:r ..,k 7". It. .iw. p mss,.. z • "'tf . •.y„ :itr'p4,p, . S, ~i'`'i'>i~•` , f . r,am . E ti'S •a,r -z'S ,t> =3:°"'* d ' ..hv.<~ .e°i',cmiti^. .+s• -a,q ` R-ta ~'u ~ ~J ti3u' ~ f^. "~v'a( }~.n* ~ ~i. % •~-1,3 e1. r wad''' $ , „t ~ : . 4,-, u!'' vk•'{F t' t` "a %P d ~ ,C . « t3' r ~ 4 ~ a ~.3,+e...l n%- ^ : 't x~ r, a• r1: ' > ~ „ ~ ~$h'.e~z: sra~ 3>~-.. '''ix~.,r ..`xr~ ,^ta x. ;T °a- >i?•' -Sr - ra,-'.a '"",.rt.~ a.~v.,w>'G':S''::r,,G,n, . y J„ b. .•-"L"' b , kY # . 11a k;''" +'Syi , »m ' . r t ,.fi, t e l~ . 7 , +,wl A•u nq€'.">», a?,, .h . .:>ar •i _ :a 'z"L" .'•fa~" A~': ~tR rs .mot ,«.-rt~ t tt> + , f ,,fie":. ,,,k "a _ ?,aS''-~8='.. l "vT- .s'^' ,r ^k s •s' ,c n~ ro~, ti~ ";:v: u't^a.. • . d a-,. , ~"~,r, , µ , , •,t'. , k . ~ )t s ~i. .:a ,-r. fi . y",..^~'~; ^f. p r, e ,u,...r.,,< ~,;i.,.,.v{, ,.,~~"~r°a.-.ikf'r." ,✓.,w t'r:'„ ,st :b dd Mt 'h ~y-}" :.2 s r Nr-r'c~'-' -r.r-•,... T_^'^'~„~ ~'.°z";•~., ti 1,',':."'rn r~ :h I 5 ! i, r - l I]] f y;!;r G's c. P ,.r'r I + 'FYr`°~ ~~„rIi^r', f ~s-, ,r+~~ f.'~~ t.+1 , ~ k I r:i :•F° uY' ~;n li F:7,~ -V t~ +ti ?4. d*" { ! { .i. 1 - 'i ~ :.y 11~..'. ~r :i Xr a .:4 I .'s i,' I ~:i {iy t• t 1 1 Lt3i" ti.,.~, .I ~ r:~g ri f '"I~ 1 I i r ;~7 1I { w LT , { F'; I . ~ c( a~,S~S r~ Jk ~'1 ~ it-~SirtB tq ~ iFwS I a r I ty I i f I} _L..c. ..•A~.W}~ a ,-t.a t F 1: , r^ . u , 5- v 'N - ~i t , a} t,µt , yu-"' .w" , " „#rd .3>°~t~, .c ~ ..rt Vi'e' ~ ,,.r ~ -3- f„,; ~ ^3 - a":1 i a ,1 , tk€.., * J:' ..„t,o dx~,.a :r^;•,rh ~ 3~ 't 1 ,n t~ ~ J:.- .fi + U'~' ~91u'ay r£,. 5+ ?~.c+Jr _t' ',',a`>;' tar r ~ { - ..1 ,.,p gy,«d.yn :'dr 'aarv t _ qEa :L rh,. V X,~ d'~~' A s e. _ ✓ 9,.a,r ,tj z ( 4tx `?_rL •ra a s.^ , r, `,m%y a~i. '!c,'.'[ `s;: r: t> 's .F .,;r ,r.,.~,w „,e A.% 'i''a. s+,."s~ir~„'fir - + e •:'X3 - ',y;;`: "r'=rvr T... "»fr mS"" - i, *a r7•'~ r{ '.-^es ' ~,,..xka" • L`. 1'-F: f ~ ~f - ,mr~ -s ,a,. I'a, ,,h ,n r - Y t . ¢ -'n "rr' - .5„i.• o~sd'i„ •v7~' ,w'Y_,.~r,t x.~ r >~at ..M 1 ~ . ~i a'~~t" : nt"', .h(,3, , t , a . 15, ,,4x ~,r~' 'g. „"t. ~`a -o-q r~., "`:Ae ~ C..{h 'W?' '."4'a7jr•. „4,• ~A :'41+i,~~'=.""'^:*rF~x >>.6 .r:' t'~'x2~ M, 4, .XT ~ .S-•? S.l=Std.' ;~~r,.:~,„IY, y1. g{~~ Y'~. `4, ,nc S>&+a u"k •f4iY xy»'7 1tJaYF d5` cr`4`",.SA% . ,'1? "A ti" .'JR. '•'~.*aM; S. ,E'r. F.it r ;Y,• 'v, <C .:+ki: LPSv." '6Cn. g'' :s`f+, s~*';,,s'Ah=, P - ~i: h1, ia; -,.,qr,'. .2 di ,~I, ..•n;~N ^,•r _,~'^~a .`:'o-~~ ,re~• . ~~r~,.' .,r ,f~ ~+~~~k h~ a;a.f.~"e k~; .r~~, `r„<:.~ ,.r, r"'r"w',.w.r3..., ,fix ~ _ 7 'u~'..,~'.n,h «~`~'t` .,'^a„ ;~r~w~sx vt Y'',ti,rn,. ~ h ax .,c~~ :•'">iim-, :"h, ":At„v- .av. ,e, ?z w,a~ '`~~',3'°,'~a, ,r, .~+;ayt r u~.~ t "X..`~a. ib "~:s"~'=.,,~, d:', ~r°~, c ,s-^; ~~~a~. ..v' ~a"St'~ !"fir..` ~ k ~~•";,ra.'`k'~,. ~3~'°,:>, ..Fret.'- `a+., d ..t,,. ~ ;JL. rt,• . -Xm.. :ra€.e'.,' -~"h ,N.~' z`4- e .x.~ T5 r i". L ~ .y q . ,~#tar .d' T ,..,x f:. $1€.v4"r y 3.,- Y2 ~ j=k"^:"o3`"^✓ti . k:,' ' k ' " , m. u,'ks ' r#- w a,±''~^''„ " : a-~- a ..x ` • ~ s,~.~'u'rS,. t a......,. "y'-,^ i " s.. ,x 'w, . ~ r~ . s :f` ..,E L,~rr' x'' . ~>zk '4~ eau wr -S •'~i, rL, f ae '"4. „t r-r ,.f, ,r' +1 ~ •d5-, r~ "c., I c. a.. p~~: C"' ~ .iP, ,r,~,, ~X r»~ r.r,_:..i -~.,F~ 'r -{°:~'r,~'>a 4?c", - ^r'ar ~ :r„z,: ~wr.'~~.:1^~^:.x, „yn, z .tz * a~' X' _ ,vr <5'~' .d«:^G- s~,± ~f`"' ~'ae:, >f r- 'r t'r.. =;.a-, . ;uaat~ t ,gn t*=i ,r ;:a: ' ..t +u r'.3^^s`* . 1• ax , , : l,r t - i~ r, '14Y N(F~~, , .'.tytl .:-d.. % P i$•. «y i~}" +,ihY'.R: 3< »..,ra;W~ - i.,. ,.i ..;~»>a. r tr „c ..•.x ckn :qo :'„R "a •°n,,, '`v.~-,.tr r` ht „+a ~Y, r• ,v+. , ~t , f r t'~ t,r • >rgsrt ,,,V° ^u, 1. H», 'r~, ^7. •'ett"~. ~`s~ta ~..A 4:': r, it: 4' 3e "v' >~.•7. t~`al rzs °a7 1'r K, rt: w.~?,.,a vyy5,',.s :"•n'drt-,r:•*:+t^.'%:: v 1. t $ f if 1•' r, ~ rt 7 ' t Orr ,->aR n,w r."r", ar °o-..,r, C `;L. ,Yt. ~.av 1 >•'t',::.,',a.. rk Yn", . T'^ T' fl ~`7.; 5 fS}'°r °ts'i Q±.. mot, ) GY"- rP'„ w. , 5 ~ ~ are" r* , •.~»'k,;,; t l t.' i;-aE s n ' x C- - ^ rxr v,,. ..,uaW°~.;.;.~r,:nr„i,,..ou:t„•,?.;.Ga...:~.=.,c1a',:L. .M, ..."...v.,.`....~'su.~t .L - L a a~,",aas'rw^>.:`..s` .,:,r~.r~+ r'.....,..~. :y sz=,.,, ' ~ r t P Y ty ? x'~N e '~f ~ - r rj 113,}# o 7 I ' q ,t i t'~`l r ev Z NOIldO'NV1dlOOki IVLLtlVd i 6[& r y ; F f (Wo zy' L NOIIdO-NVId t F4' lDONIYI1HVd I I I I I ~r 4 I I I- ~-q-~ ~ I q ~ ,7 I I I I T❑ mno..uw , t ~a i ~ j 1$~~ I I .1~ 9 {M { I I o I i Y I } t , 1. ~i l1 , I s ~C? ----I I A - I c { a s ~ ~ I I I I I I ' I I I I I I V* i~q f,, Jf~~ I I I I I I a dates 3s,t ~k `r"i' ' a t 5 i? ~ ~ I I I I I I : ~e > Y- r :ir ax' ksS`.F 4 C ? ( S„ 3safr, off. r, "t ",r`t,, : r 1 r t 6 ~ 'n~-t s ::1 >.,:'cf, lS ' S l ~ l,' i- ~:4'• . h ,`l: p „ >i',..,.s . d- s T+`.Fr'w• t^ ' F s r x~ r. kr^ L^' 'd4 a t, . ten, x, tm',,, . M1a-. t• , i ,'.,1 xa r ti - k rV'r4 , , I' wr r ^-✓3 f;i 'E' +'n~ m:ySir V~ L'l y 7^ "h 'fit' h _ - t R y w t ~ r<rv.. ~ ~ V e fYr'v i-+ t, N' ' 1' .^1r . r.wt ~r,',:+ t ' r" n +r ~ It yun •^•;n "Y. rf , "":i~•,,. '^•,,yy..~~ <„s .ls ~'$''^'rt,5 :>w'~, a yv+:~.`. hp.t ...,'t .1 t .*1` . al }J c: '"3,7. .4' r• ...,.',krr.,.. F. . 1 nc ,,a1^* i 1 Y~•~,E r'~,- d ry. X; 7r, t { nl`7~ '°''L y .«.ny i'yt ,{•...r f 5+.~ r .Y ' m+ 55 " t>f .',Y~SUt Z. gFYczi^`,9 t-~a •s r °y Hr. ' P f4 7. rk~ - c r r r j 4 r ~ ~a °'rs c t .,rte ! F • Gx { 6,r 3 • =x .r f s r U - wL rr «ai Fa' S ..•,fi mG, . 'rya i?"5 fi c yy T. A' M.r F' I V, 41 ,'lar - I -tSr _a., t xr".ntA.,T:,ft rm x , -S k 3n~ y, a. r . =s t Y , ,.3.. nG . 'Y, I I- ,i- 'sp h "X +sr S.. " k yam?,, . § C, 'N U 4 t. s t S- ~ :1-." ,.t . h 'l" T.. "i:rzxw`w>• `•ere'C°.,.,„ F l 4 i ''-J 1 ,'S6 { 1 A ZIF Y ° ~ P f F NRYl [wv nE SnMtER rE'N tFT4F00irN fPRxN~9E+PM 2 t:t,= J 3"' W ! r St SiF/IItCCA 1t i t N/.nEfS AoPMICMRES4llg i~ 'aEEi~3+iCFiNENiWB }F' ~"'A - S •FN rJrtE9 X Y1+ M, ~N~rNE, CC - - N2ar.NCN. Neu t"," - I' 2181 :100n -'4 tt _ ~CfgN EC~~ ~ 7 rq Q. 6 d t ~y c s ~ I{ 3 f l ' rrw s ~ f P~ 11 Ill] Ill 111111 H 11 Al 1111 Ill 11111 1111 •,a Merv } [ ELEVATIONS SECTION i MEN= f s t1FYA,lOl6 A 4 Nt ..,P t ah y~c 1 Z 4 { i i A. Y A C wJ' i i Y t. 5 M 2~ t. '""zr qtr ~uj £ t 'p x•}na "oa ;rye., {Ar t J 't Y S- S,_ ( Mfr ur'T .5 r1•~."• { l - wl _ d , f:, _Y t~ a a _ _ eu^ tt c'4 . C t ^'i '+P _ t r.X'. r 5. ..^r r is~r~ t 5~, ~ .'#°el k .N ^M:'ur'= Ae~U .,t.'v, ..t ,rr,. s,X". lh^J~ ? - h : i - r`:« 3 t"• : 3 n. } .,f' >r 't . x, `P l 4„. >3+ ,-h, l . r.! r, :Y . +~^t, ,f : r' C`~ x r3P p -r. ;1 - , a « ,e +:3 s rc. • v,;c, ,t "r. • i s e3. , v ~'tn I'M x.., +t 4 "Ie:'. ,'d { »af^4;4,,,"."r +,7 n, -e' ^Y,'sr,4,•. ryrye~'' , ,'sw !x,: x _ ,9F ,Y;FC,i F -.Lwa ~Yw, ,.R ' u'rct•"` rSH. Y r `s-v,1„ °'4 °:L, f r t -V - i-f u "rkt r T n`,•''r 3 bi o :.'tC:.". - `ac e-~'•" a ~1.`,Y } .C.' 1 Fr dl, ,,,p rrsl "t.',~ a r kr ,.tom... :'l.e.... v.. is F' S"ni'.'.,'k,'.Y• •d. .LaaP: L` .Y } e .Ii" .`{''r3', ~S^' Ti ^~i.a:~'F ,:4'.~".'t $ •=-75' `i«r. { ,P'•^ 3 J ~ r Y a': .«Ys:'' +.,i, e nr t• A ..N~ . .~•k ,.4 •_cm`;:,- .r"}-' r7: ,e .f yd.;; ,.°t::;a,.; r. 4,0 E :-„-..n... :r.+,.r++, Y ,Ar^ ~.•e~ "i.. H~,.et:~ . z..7:._.,. n. ,-..~'-rryhn. _ 3,: r,-...;,, I s~ ,,rt i' ;:+Jrlt r>' ,I, •,.k r flyt;~l g .;6.'.. a l~ Sac ! f ' f I- P f ;;t A r I :w ca §L IF, } t tt; ~ I a 1;-7# h ! i.. I i r c>.! ..r !Ir I ,,~f L !r~ r$ t~'J` t Z/ -I ® ~ t y to TWA: J - - - j` pV d f, J 4 K a r _ _Y WS - y~ r r Win 1710015 s t x ~ 5~r 2 5 , lM Y iA ~ t - 2r h t h { sF t ; o cy~ S r +I'$ ,'dry N~ :,~,i1sr~. w.,. T yet. - 'men S "MIN act 'zF r, J I E7 n ffi " k sc rP•je*a is + - t T;t i s6°.v~ a- sx r W ~ i v y mom 4 a A ANA, 'U 31 S 'Ina 04 P k ae'ay St,- F7 1 y j RAW- ?f` y aY fi t..iJ" t v } s 1 0 mom t t a _ct; irk x t ~ 1 rpp~~ - _ s ° z Q ? i cn of n m TIGARD CITY HALL M%Wbf ® ~mv^,„,[srs^ r^- I7t Q' i ~R i urnswoe~imn ROOFINGPRO.IECT . a r 3 1 nperd nn fTld =711 rm Y - t3 - ~ I - fi ~'1 Umr vr.sryr I ';.3 ys s,- a swam. ~}S~, r ti a a~~~;+:s~~rn°*~r~~-~;r<;~~......~-~-,•n-~en:enl' ~s•~;• wx''s;;"-= - _ ',~-;~.~`~;s~ M?'-~ ~ r~~`~r~~~~~ - v , cam. s„ i eq ~jc cw? i^ ,xu ,fY+rwv^:.. r F• e t '~f/r'."^ n +v g'" ~ r s '.s"x - .a _ssg r +^+5 r ;rv h-i s: ~ ..d _r..-.•~„~ a•~i:r4t ~I.,~yLiJ~:-~-,,d~'.'t~. i~'~'° fi3`?~ »`.L•'a-.'t~.S.' 3 zR n -w PRO F: _'::.......,.:3. CLAMATION r ' To designate the week of May 19-25,1996 as "Emergency Medical Services Week" x r, i rp fisr ~"'•w~ ~ ~ ? ~ =WHEREAS, emergency medical services are vital public services; and sn x 4 ry WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to ~xT ra provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and r 4 WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and tv r 1 T WHEREAS, emergency medical services providers have traditionally served as the c_ safety net of America's health care system; and z t j WHEREAS, emergency medical services iearns consist of emergency physidans, - emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters,_ educators, administrators, and others; and ~y ' WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career "°fr=`°= °ry= '"^t;'.?s *-"S~a3 ¢:Ev'9{Y-'~.:,.~c•Yxx n'rv-,., or volunteer, engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing 4 €s` education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and j 3 WHEREAS, our citizens benefit daily from the knowledge and skills of these highly r k - fr`~ , trained individuals; and f z WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of the EMS system will help % reduce national health care costs; X NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, James Nicoli, Mayor of the City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim the week of May 19-25, 1996 as - "Emergency Medical Services Week"; I~ g, q- and encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs,t"A , x c ceremonies, and activities. 4r~~ a, ~ F Dated this day of 1996.$ k f c F r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the = rs j City of Tigard to be affixed. rt £ pp ,F b 1 } James Nicoli, Mayor * r , City of Tigard a'iS Attest: City Recorder ¢ „ , > € anx r, r ts,1 „S a = TM?'cverin»crr~ . ~s'et;r^.^ ;ri'w - '-'~7'. f y4'.C a y'? jj" P rj _ r K r r s 4 f f - 4 • ~ a _ ' '1Yom. 1•,'!F h ! 1"^'f' ~'T fH M:-1M M' ly(L J. f f~ T ~~FSK 4~ b. V } 0. L~ f✓Yl' '~1'1 T' 'T'SB; "~TYSL ! L `t S -'-n~,},y J. .'L - 1 - - - ~ _ ~ ~ t•i~.. ~~,~r-~. _ - - J- ~'may.. ' o® 0 ETRO MBULANCE / 232 S.E. 8th Avenue - Hillsboro, Oregon 97123-4218 648-6658 639-6210 J, R - May 1, 1996 William A. Monahan City Manager MAY 0 7 t583 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 - - - j Dear Mr. Monahan: Enclosed for your consideration is a draft proclamation for Emergency Medical Services Week, May 19-25, 1996. On behalf of the EMS providers in Washington County, we are asking that you present this or a similar proclamation to your Council for adoption. _ jZ~ This year marks the 30th anniversary of the landmark National Academy of Sciences report, Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society. This . report focused national attention on the problems throughout emergency care and revealed s that Americans would have a greater chance of survival in the combat zone of Vietnam than> 10 on the average city street. That's how undeveloped the EMS system was. It was this report that helped crystallize public opinion on the critical need for an emergency response system. Y Today, we are proud of our EMS system. Engaging and coordinating the professionalism and specialties of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators, and others, the Washington County EMS system provides lifegiving skills to our citizens in times of crisis. If this item can be placed on a your agenda, we would be pleased to make a short 1. presentation before your Council to honor our EMS partners, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. Please contact Bonnie Hays at 641-0695 or 307-7260 at your earliest convenience to let us know when we might appear before you. f Thank you in advance for your consideration. l Sincerely, J.D. Fuiten President c 77477 d Serving Washington County Since 1953 } - - - -'i I _ l t -f .i i._._M~, ~,wx-es wl~g _ yr ~nx v .l,.jx .-?.jy +n z,r.~^r~~:.. W , ~ "x. L4r 1 f - ~ - - - 4 F1- N,i - k` -~-,t t - - - , v ~,S ut,a p~ a"9g~-t'~:-t, tr v- - - u'. r,z ~y a 4 L 1Fi k j,'l y 44 S y E 4 M , ~ ~k h-• ice- W~ ..L .s_r ..r..~.a.... , _n-,. r _ h.'i _ vu Y T tc"u"a r a - t c llull 3°, s-~ { - y - _11""".ih d i 2r - s ETRO MBULANCE 4r Lzx EST 1 _;fi`` Y _ A P.O. Box 1635 } T - I, ~ a - Hillsboro. Oregon 97123-1635 r s. `e 648-6658 ~n' , _ r G May 1, 1996 r - r MAY 0 3 f9&B i. I r , ~ € ~ ~ r ' a- - t - MR - _ ` ~ z ?i - v },ny , Y~ Mayor Jim Nicoli :-g ' City of Tigard P r i 13125 Sw Hall Blvd. t n{~ { { Tigard, OR 97223 sX~ r, xs5a-sad'; i~-~* 1 Dear Mayor Nicoli: } rL ~ x~ N r To help celebrate Emergency Medical Services Week, May 19-25, we are inviting s'-. t , I you to join us in our VIP Ride-Along Program. To best adapt to your schedule, we areX ,s ` making our EMS ambulance transport teams available to you on Saturday, Sunday, and n~~ Monday, May 18, 19, and 20. We sincerely hope that you might join us for a 2 or 4 hour , ~ ~ g MIMMZI ride-along in Washington County. We would be honored to accommodate any special fJ = `f requests that you may have that would make this opportunity better work for you. Please * ~ 4 t p call Steve Shupe at Metro West's business office (648-6658) to schedule your ride-along. - ;n} tp~ And to officially launch EMS Week, we are hosting a Burger Barbecue at our new ~,;,N n ;5 ; , , headquarters and dispatch center, located at Shute Road and Dawson Creek Place in } [ "L'~~ ~ ~--l" -t,v.'-T~ , ~ ~ - Hillsboro. Whether or not you are able to schedule a ride-along, please join us on Monday, k , -1 ~ -M ' May 20th from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. to show your support for the EMS professionals that serve V I your community. And bring your family, as there will be displays, emergency equipment, _ ~ ambulances, and fire trucks on site. Steve Shupe (648-6658) will be able to give you x;1- 1 "t 21 ' - complete directions to the site. " -t' 1 ..w ~ We are proud of our EMS system. Engaging and coordinating the professionalism and specialties of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, f It c paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators, and others, the Washington County EMS z n ~ r n I system provides lifegiving skills to our citizens in times of crisis. Please join us in4 celebrating the accomplishments of our Washington County Emergency Medical Services ~ F,, t, ~ t providers. We look forward to seeing you during EMS Week! - , W ~ a z - , - K, Sincerely, '-1 } - 4 ty ,t' S v , il_-,,~`_~," "I , 1". t - , £ LE' 3 F y J.D. Fuiten _ President i 4J, k~s `Fe . ~ y= ckf i - E t ~ - - - x Serving Washington County Since 1953 f n , < tin ~.~o, a' _ rl ^y' r $ s : ra _i-r. F .,a.:.Unt. - - f aY z - r X, f sF~, y i j" p -`F V l ) - 1. . T ,r ' J~ j qt k , - 3 f E - JET .L l - j T F j q s rk? - `h- 1( A, tt . - F i - - - - u -L rv ! ,~,r7,ee r r, P f c+. r- r-cn{ rn-~7 "s ,aa'•. r~r r i-r•~«e+r .ii'u r wsv._r,1 _ r .n t _ _ i ma, , - ~V~ ~ : " I - , , ~ 77 , - - - - - . Al - , I, ~ - `3',~, , - Z$ f 2 iKsy ~'"v -tY} ~ timsri+~'EA--.CT°.f..4 - F_..n. - =2:.. sa..; yx,aw.:... .11 I X12 , 3, }T,--f' ,H~ r"F- _ - _ _ - r`at.FJfiN- Y tS'.Ca'9 ~~.~rC_~'k. »'•cne...~+..J.s, a w a :..vJ _ _.c~,.....,....2.tca'4«.u W..a_ ~'..,.,w<+,~c+~~s,__-_ ,,yy: 4 ,~'y i S~ g !~`.~,"?q' I i~f - 's ~ a } - _ TIGARD CITY HALL CITY HALL RE-ROOF PROJECT R , Summary of Work t ! t n- , f a }'i } ' F ar A i i DIV[SION1 GENERAL CONDITIONS - - = ' ~ ~W General Requirements: Use City provided Contract for Construction and AIA A201 for L' ' , t- j 1 ± } Owner/Contractor agreement. Bid and Performance/ Payment bonds will be required. Insurance F;: ~_X- s- Certificates required. Prevailing Wage Rates required. City to provide: Invitation to Bid, Instructions E" , x A ~ 11 jam: to Bidders and Non Collusion Affidavit. r T° , 3 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK s'~ ~ f ~ } 1. Demolition It ` a. Exterior existing roof prep: clean off all debris, prep for new sleepers or cripple walls. t a a `1t, s . f f b. Dig holes for new drywells or daylight trench for metal roof option. . $ ~ s- Al , 11 f ? , ,r, 4 . k X&Y, c Utilities: Remove and replace utilities as needed: electrical conduit. .a x t " 1 t 1 c'# s _4. 4' e. Exterior Door. Remove existing door and frame for new opening for metal roof option. , i kF5 I. Mechanical: Remove existing exhaust duct and other roof penetrations for either single-ply K %'i': f '..{5a ,t,F-~ -,c_ roof or metal roof options -1~$~ s C:. v 2. Install new drywells or daylight stone drain lines from downspouts for metal roof option. Reseed lawn, as required. s k , k # ` DIVISION3 - CONCRETE-NOT USED GIs } gY - ` '•t DIVISION 4 -MASONRY- NOT USED - 1 s ~ z' DIVISIONS -STEEL . a 1. Miscellaneous Steel: Provide misc. framing anchors as needed for new wood framing systems for xt I both options. - DIVISION 6 -WOOD AND PLASTICS s~ 'S .I i 1. Wand Framing: The new framing to be wood joists, studs and posts, and sheathing. The existing H € building is sized for a second floor and has ample capacity to carry the additional dead load. . bt ` t , z i DIVISION 7 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION E 3h - 1- _ r 1. Roof: Option 1 Metal Roof: Provide a 3/4" per foot sloped prefinished metal roof, gutters and , QV.. b j downspouts. This would em, stalled over building paper and wood sheathing. l t '-3{ 2. Roof-Option 2 Single-ply roof over sheathing on wood sleepers. Install non-combustible blow in > exa y r; insulation between the sleepers. Install metal roof system over wood framing over the mechanical well area. Option 3 (not shown) would be to install a cover board and the single ply , y roof system over the existing flat roof. This would save approx. $20,000 in the wood sleeper s } system. „ f 3. For either option install translucent fiberglass roof panels over the mechanical well to naturally T+ illuminate the well to reduce costs for providing lighting. These roof panels would be removable ' - 'c¢ x, L for future access to the mechanical well equipment. f f - 1 E~ k fi 4* - Y _T' -C tt ^ r s- May 74,1996 Richard E. Ragland, AIA Architects & Planners Page I - 1T z# Y r - z r-`N , r_, is - - - "a 6 rkr i - $ '"3',i~. cmrc` =-f'" 2'a ^r xr> - I ;}a, . V s r.;w.r;..:.as,.-' ' .n, r yea - 5"'M1B c a ' y-+.L`~' A f, a r _ 1} a - S z? '-r' w - a r - # - 3 Y e Z 5 ! - t',- _ C-*~-rf }rte - t t { ` r, F i + - .r 14 - i - ~ l~ ~ 11 I I . 1. - _ " il":', , « I rr -1 12 - - 11 r - ~ i • - -mac",3 ff i ~-i : L h rr .lG'~ str,~9.er~, ~rv«:-P;n s. ,sr•.' t. - _ ~...~-ic ,1-c:,, : ,a.' `=`.-,rC ws~i -;,',11 .z-.sue..! r x~-t r a!~ -',~,`!P P`,*,M ,,_1- .,1' w - -cam. a - - ' , . . w-i--, --ter r..rrk.„er,..^ -z4-,. - - - - . - - + ' - - - - ..r.. - - a- A £ _ _ Oi , ,.~",--,-~-1-~,~~-I'l"~'-",---~l-,,~i;,-~,~.',,~: - f,_,,_,_ , I •e.. °r+` Sys f - s, _ r t at, : S - - 3m t a. sa, a - , ' * s~ .",w-1 f k- + ..,t-c S 1, , :st.: t'e- € L ~.r F's' Ss a5 i 5 z - u. L r5 & _ s` . S - ..a,..:_.~.....v...~.-v z.z..._.._- :'E.t::,x .....a. ..,.:s ss, _•5 - _ e - a 'ta ya S' iz ' E: "r - ~ MEN-, - 4, i, A ~ ° „ : ? ,E' Tigard City Hall k• „ - 2u.K z :e r City Hall He-roof project 3,.. s _ w ,{?..art a«i ,4: lk: _ ~i .:ra'1.: : it ,I . s ' , $ 4. Sheet Metal: Provide new sheet metal flashing at the parapet for the metal roofing system, and V", ~ci CD L C;i43:;-.° ai=°.'.cz:=°y'z°,'-%' Ftt,s', k...-. sr_Ire' •iTt`Y~-~''` a i d install the single ply roof under the existing flashing at the single ply system, except where it , "z , i meets the building walls where a new reglet would be cut in. , ~2 Q~ ~ - { 5. Joint Sealants: Provide joint sealants at all new trim and flashing when needed. k ^i`riSiyN 8 -DOORS AND WINDOWS - i jay ° 1. New Doors: For the metal roofing option a new access door is required to replace the existing. At g j`,'t s ~ 11 the single ply option a new access door is required on the gable end for access to the mechanical ~Z , ~x < ~s i well. ' ~g ° ` ' ii s r DIVISIONS -FINISHES , k ~ 1. Painting: Provide painting at all exposed non-prefinished areas at the exterior, as needed for , , s t !q;K11'i .1 ' a both options. K' v r s r DIVISION10 - SPECIALTIES , ? , , r ° 1. Louvers/Vents: Provide new metal wall louvers at the gable ends and/or gravity vents at the roof rZI 1.1 fiN il~ 4 w- ' required by the mechanical systems to ventilate the mechanical well. t i 4 _ " r~ t' 'G o- DIVISION11 - EQUIPMENT-NOTUSED q> ` F , DIVISION 15 - MECHANICAL t', , z, X ~M 1M` ,~R > 1. Install a new dry fire sprinkler system for the metal roof option throughout the entire roof area to " - r*>, 0 meet building code. Provide an extension of the wet fire sprinkler stem in the mechanical well - , ~ 1 under the new metal roof in the single ply roof option. a k ,"MR sy 1 2. Revise the existing exhaust duds and vents, as needed, for either option. ; r t _ DIVISION 16 -ELECTRICAL ass p r, 1. Provide some electrical lighting in the access door area for the metal roof option. ! - - rt € . , ~S _,rr a ff } 11 t t, 7 re dt _ ,i - f ; ',s Y~ tit} ~4 ~ tiY z a vr, - { - Yr a J Y , l -F r t_ ~r I j k 9p,4 k - of.y-fir FI 1.11-11 i" k May 14,19% Richard E Ragland, AIA Architects & Planners Page2 r ,3 "4xx{ , a~ 5 } Mt-ik - , 'a~;l 'may Y{ 'L d C..C '°f~' F Ay"e" Pik .N- ^Y sra+.'4 - - T C. N' YD'S-' t l " , C 4 Y A F4 , , , , ll y 5 s - _`C bu~ y -4 fj A _ - - [ LZ - - ~ ; , - - - 3_ Z4 -.b 1=.F t J i -t - .?T T cT„iy. 5 Y t + i 3 . .YJ r~ K C .F Y h re.i: - A y M ^'F d ! - F } 1 f ~..~~~'a ?-y7*~S~' 't fir- L } Ix - _ M.~,~ . ,r 1 ' i - S..az..r.> r3*a-t~~-~ '.:.$c lz`' a`d F r z'F` as c s , s ~'r' 6 -Mn k x ' g r .rte ; ® 'ggf ~ - , as V`k`lrf ' u; CITY OF TI6AR® S TI7NCY THE STAADA D FOR RWl F EXCEL FN € - ;x i c , "t x OREGON ~ a' s g y - il~ - - ~ ~k r fi ~ - Bi ° r ,k" `e > To: Mayor Nicoli ~ ,sue'-.a ~ 2C-C" I Sy 4' rh t°w ytL''' ~YF`s' i r Company: r, t r . Phone: Fax: Uz sz F I y_ 60,n; 1, , , 's Y a - t - ~ From: Cathy Wheatley ~ g 1 4_ 'I r ~ - - tee,.. - - - F ,.a, s.r .m=am'F...~ N I- I r ` - ; .z . REV " Company: City of Tigard` t Phone: (503) 639-4171 h Mr - - Fax: (503) 684-7297 w j"s " ¢ t { , E 3~ Date: 516196 - , . ,3 k{ Pages including this page: 5 ~ x~ { _A.ayl' S$~ 1s i t ~ COMMENTS: r - - : , a , x . K5z ` - Here is the information about Ballot Measure 31 that Bill asked I send to you. ~ * - :t r I will put this on as a discussion item on the May 14 agenda. It: y t hf - '+P ` L L 1 Y f SL4 -.F k{ - s+ _ > :'"a€4,r3 ads<: I1 c, -t to t _ G gaJ~? f, ;-x -2 i _ a r -r " ~1-~'- , - " '%!P jl'M~ [ ' L 11 1 - y, - - - - , x- x 7 It ' - v -,a.' "ash f ' J 5t~ '3~~; City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223' , ,i,g ~ -4~{ ,z } ~~•rw/~ PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY - = 1. .ee: t~t'• c.?s~- :.1,nd-n1,-,4h 1P'21 d.. x r...~`~'.?' i- y - ^.j "s s ~s,M q --",re.."'T°s"." wuy1-1--.- 7'~ 3~*Y,m-^v _ { r ] J J Y 7 L ....nt,~ a - ~'a x+- - y a .y a "~~rm ~ xs ' c - - 'r r - ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ - 1. ~ I I, ~ , I I ~ , 1*11 ~ - , -1; - '":~~f-'~-' i - e~, -"~~','4'-~ 44'~~', - _f. 4b--'te a ?F - - _ - }s? ry-" ,aY z~.-' 3} f -MY r i - f- 4 aq - C t f ash - - - k Z t r _ -k E' 3 - j s - - a + is 17 1 1 ~ - 'C' ' ` ' - - -1 ~ 11 -.1, --L'----1'--"1,:1-'. ~ ' ~z ~ , - - " ' ' - ' " , , I -1 i I i - # , yk 3r. {W_ t! ~'f~, ~•r 3..a" e Sa ti.-. 43~. 'Y:.. , A+.l xi _v~ r;' Sar•- - .A? - 'fie`<~~+.~Y'~-f'~x`b''+ 43_-, d - _ $ ; `-•n - _ _ - 2'~A'~ sr t-v r r t P ark s - < 2- ~ i- w L-i. + - Fk ys { r 1 -s.. r r 3 ,x < y WIN u. = r.`xr# dg.sx s - - J - t r* .h 4+-y~r~ fr,.2 :lt - WaKpY Ok, a 5 d From "Bill Monahan" <FINANCEIBILL> To: "Cathy Wheatly" <FINANCEICATHY> R "hit 1R A- 411116~ r 42.18_03 +0000 Date sent: Subject: Re: Support of Ballot Measure 31 Could you do a memo to the Mayor advising that we can do this? Lets sy~ put this on the agenda for next week. From "Cathy Wheatly" <FINANCE/CATHY>~ x To: Bill ti Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 09:49:33 +0000 w < . tt Subject: Support of Ballot Measure 31 r , r 61 V hr s, Maggie says: For city council no problem if as an individual orb` N £ as a group they want to take a position on a measure or a candidate., <t r There is a problem with expending public $ to support; therefore, any ,mailing, copies, etc. would have to be done 18ttcrs or resoWtions hx - by someone other than city staff. Cathy 3-`- ."Mrs •*`-g` ,fin '~-~"i s _ - ~ z Mne, P"r s r x , -'O'pt. x`c E _ i 11, g~ ~ M', Krl~ r l k f htyg h P- 4, ~ ' g} . a 3 'Og ~~-'~'s'-`~4 F£`~.,° r~` a X - i x r . t? a 7~ro-x~ q » y.~- tt• F; , a ~`ia'y ~`°`'tx`t~ E,,•r'~*~i ~r~ ~'T}- „-v.. s - ~ f ~ _ 'r. > ~ ;x -t- ;y,~~$n+v'~,~.m'"'~{,z " ~ s X-.S _ .iv a b-srFc-ztie y.. I ri y r~¢w7r~r.r~•`~sY• ~ +rCa t 7- ?K qT7 SK, 'PORT 41 , C'x f ~ i2a - y 3 .z 4 y, S y45 ,,.kz+ $ i s t r 4 t ,r to ' ' cye r t - b Y yr aLLL Council Agenda Item For Agenda of Ll 191, - t xX MEMORANDUM f, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i Honorable Mayor and City Council TO: FROM: Bill Monahan, City Administrator Y-, a DATE: May 6,1996 SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, April through June 1996 g< 'fgg- t F Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can , L s proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. ,K '4 k r 45 . -we gpgu~rn 2 Thurs Budget Committee Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Y f# 9 Thurs Budget Committee Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) ' M~ ?zl q, *14 Toes Council Meeting - (6.30 p.m.) r: 'xz=fir s Study Session („N T i h~M Business Meeting y ; { s 16 Thurs Budget Committee Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)~ *21 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) , ~ M s r - ,?tix s _ 27 Mon Memorial Day Holiday -City Offices Closed - *28 Tucs Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.)' S h " Study Session „-W r r~ r z z Business Meeting ' r s' i Tune _ *11 Toes Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session a "e.,~ Business Meeting = 1 rRX *18 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) r *25 Toes Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) i Study Session # era {"x Business Meeting 3uR E V J~ My r-,2' *9 Toes Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) a 7 ° Study Session .?a a 3°~-{-.°,r Business Meeting N k R ~ *16 Tues Council Workshop Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) r c *23 Toes Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) t ~Cxs C Study Session Business Meeting '~.rrN try ktfk---, - t3a7~ r h _ ,u-' ~ i:\adm\CathyicouucilkccaLdoc a°~- n rx, t 2y v -2-t P MOM. 1 r r5ffl4 Y 1 l ~'4 M "~yt 4 . R,rt,3 ✓°y 5^-~--......r5.-"~7P•w a ^a.'--'."'" r^' - t `'i ~.r-6 rg~s~.r5 kG} b ~VW r"h S } x h m4 F 1 G k syyts a, 1, u w t w£ kw 1 tii % vg, R `~"•~''t,t~'r`j `4~-~ as v s ti ~ ~ k s - ~ s ~ ~kLx'~ z:f'..r Jm .~.;ew f_ t.M 'sl .wad ~•'~"at ,..f -3 ....._~_'°"'m.4' C Z-VYM Sv `x,, x'd' 1$ k z 7 ''F k - 6.'~ ~ =.z~"k:ixar~s- ~ 4 _ z ,mac L_',tr . 7 S~' -~~y'~z~- •h 0z.~2';c`a"aa NK 10- Item ~1,%E~ f-z w`t~' ka4i,x#. w, 3 ~5 -!c'am`'`'§Y•k'P~a r F - T - _ 1 M ^.,^Y 7 £ - Agenda Item No. 3. a b " s~ r4 ~sr, ~w rr , Meeting of 511`/ /G P Updated 516196 ' b h TENTATIVE COUNCIL AGtnvAS Mote: items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) X 4 `s' Date: May 21, 1996 _F Type: !Workshop (No TV) < Start rune: 6:30 p.m. 3s s a Y Workshop Meeting Topics: K > CIT Communications (Liz) s 4fi > Metro 2040 Update (Jim) 1 F ry fir > Finalize - Responsibility areas Planning - Commimion/Cidzen ; Involvement Teams (Bill) Jim) { > r1mrd Feed and Seed Store Update (Chamber of Commerce) s z} > Train6rg: "Insurance 101 ° (Loreen) ~ = y t -13,k .F; t - I I 1Z 7, Z41 s 'f F aft rtr r,~'pt - _ 21, N a `ag R' , fi k~ s eel t ` t 70 M f y s'~~'~ ~ v~{„ yid q' ~ _ x -'+e•' 2---~,y,..,~,{ c- •s,~ ~ '~'~`~z4. r{,t"A`r'di"4 a r5 F "r3J "w h x - - , - r k ~.,,4 s r 3r9t~firs.,x. a s-x"--°€ - z` ¢-J"~varY#-~~, exd~,(' s- _ :*7 ~a~is.~~`~s "~xs"'• 1 2. -,P•.,k ~4, '7 2G`^X'FC-- 7 f a s~`-'* i '4's4' Z - Viz'" < ~~x~ ~ x xt rxti~ fi - - .S Try $ n - - r - _ r'•' 5- I ~ !x' k ~ I tp'`s e~Y-_ hli j t ' f i`, t x i,:~ y if~~', rG1 f, f i~ t Ij`, ° ~ I ~r-~~ :a ~ L I E `i ,,f<2 1. h{'I ,t _ ® ® !Af . I r'-' I Yi j_-.,l,l r Id 1~• { ~y f ~d a , i 1 r . + r r y, i'. i 1 ® A r ® ~ ~ ~ ft ~ 6 rt; ~ { ' e ti ~ >v ~ ! 1 I,. F ak n I ~ ~ } 1 t `'.r, } _ y edl r t 's j ° i, h~ I ( rl `n 1 [ t.~ 1 1~1, ~i ~7 ~ i f fYia • ~ E 1'f tt x1 { ; l'r~,~t i i. ~i~14 i 1 _ 1 Z`. I ~ ! e Y Y _ _ hiE - .yF x .:q,,,''wx,.u . ,i; r s;r^.x,+sr~ . rs. r° - ) ~k, =`bas; ,`+.5- r-.~ 's o„•r. j , .,,;.,:xa.X,; `tk~ ~ +3i y.. ,f r•,i t, ra, `a'.,._ k„ ~ ;2 ~,5 7•E: ~ „ 3 ;~44 a ~~~..P .t a a• ;~';s^ `av.'s '~'~F,'r~i i ,~,-v 'aiS,.r: '°~~'~~r ~f,,~f> tt~°` ,4,s=vt' nr _ - u S-' '.,t t. ~ . Aa " • x. d ,,,,v"~',' y,. °-,v- ».2, ~ a- - :4r - 5 ~i' re t,..ry'i.,rY"' ij~y r ..r,~ y~.: 6 ~ -yU ",d§• Eqs. w •+r „ .car . t}'r,- a^ k, `t 'v tc - :k [ L ^ J^ • v , a +,t"y " :.+e'~,~;r',^w c .s`:G "'#t' '~z .k'. „ ` ' `Ey v2. §F°r C Eai ° r°?,t`~ ~ a r a4~ ,9;,x ~ _ s ~ ~i~~F„'^:.:' "r's..s•5, ,t',^ F t7~ ~'~5 ~Z' , x • a.~~. d~. - < , ='rrti°~'~t~. ~~EA;"Sst, ".^'s',`. 4" a~ry> ~ v,q' ~ g 3 * a'~+: r OR . t° 'F' A'G'J° a a"„s ,z astirf s~"fie' H i . ,.r-.''? r ai ~•7'S,s> w. ~y, . "r ^aaSx 'el'- _ s.. o- ~i Ta ut .,>s,w.. t a', s •<p +5; »3 n rF a „xf~r~, • a d„ r.,. ,C ro v ~ ~k i•ac :,+ww'w•- 3-7 „Ys^' - ys ,'r" c, r .C ,a~' - :5!^ ate.' ,°s~„ ~.e. ila!.. ail, •r.l v ki`':" . ,.ae" „ per, <.,M~u3 ^'[j9e w xJ ~ ' •S t aE a$i.°' ar PP rA v¢y •,5 rd' 4a: 'YM+ R aq• H F y Y, y~ 4r . ~ 7, a,-.~: e~a,r,' , a. wi lrt„,a:,.'+;',~~n`?"~. _ . ~si.'•, rc, k.,, x . t. j„ 9#t.•,'a,x ad er ' r~ e~ -'kn. L .I ' i~ - x, 1 ~ f r. i C;,,"<' WK w,aG~ L . 3' Ss o ` ~ •~1C ~ , to .Na . *,r[ I-•a• t- I.~ uw F ' d * K , .•+s , :hax .'+s" r ni3>' tL ~0 . 1 T1d.J.' 7 t,.Y 'v 'a RA, ,i,.,tt. h"+5-~ ,.''kl'•R,M< b°"..,,. ,'h y~ iay:2ax«.;5::+. v U6 S ~`•i nS.c~":- •T- St, p >Sy: f.i°x =FV nS•i ,.'"f.. T='dtta i, :v J.,S%"^+. •v ,T". j°r< rv.,, a x „/:>"',i;v', - i. x::~.a: xu, ,r' « .,wr rt,E, s y ' . ; t . .+a ,z t: ~ - `r .1.' , . „ ° k, r.. aw c.e^»} • rx, - . n'.a ' `l',(., ~C :iyss e ~+r.,t.. z sc Ty,,, A, n • ,r G rr.y a,,.a. "V,'r. tf 4E; `$°'i k wp< r.t.. o Lt , .yrvii • r . ~s;a ~ a E u ~e~:.~.uait.~...~,.i~ ..t^,d:....r...ait~-r.,'`i"na":~le:'`°"a'~:,~:'r S,. * •',Y.,;,'.. .'ru~,.,.,,,_ a- a s:'tr t ~ y >~usr^~a a r t`~ f ~4 tz„ f a ? t'T/A~rf r r i aws -i a - t 3,4Mh' ra'''t apEb~ .a x~ -r •1~+,3,: a§ayhi ra E~ 5} i P t ? >.i 99 ( rr4 y r„r'1$ i _ "A Y! 9* a' - t.AY 3Yd 4 J r t2.P E . - . y I J k k t y fi ti,e r' £ G T M F { v ~1^ i I t t $i on i f 7 S f r x i- ~ i t; 3" , 711 Sr 'Y,- L f.d S 'Pr. 40 t 1 f ~ A ~ ~ ~ 1 9 _ „f t- lim 7~~, d d n e M M 0 i. f V I b~ 04 'y { t ? 1~ y t P> ~i ; ~ ~ z > J +a'~ 1 A > A'4i b k k^,an~ Y o f 1 r 1 y 5 T'`f' 4 .acyiN "`r' ~rP Y 'M t C Yk i d a }Y *„iT,, '7 r"'r Yz~r 0 rt y V~li m - '3, A, - < s v r'?_' 4 t a tby {g r sr l.n 1~~ 1{g,r~,"`E~•~*~°r L 4 ~ ~~'y li„4 4 ~ <',ti iz r - w,dtys°;~;rfr-k~i^m, ! 'k x5 t{'si,''~~` ` - 1i tv .r y i n 'r i` 1~ r X rr 3L s 1, $ gig; W; d, my a' h wit . e: Vii!., p 3 4. . x,. p n R 5 aG..:'.c' 3 n~` s sw= f 'ySJ: `•l~ ,,,,LL T - x..}i^'~`'ij 3.r ~;s Ri ~•`+r ~.i.,.rei w "''i eI.7•, k T Y t ' e > N . 4 f r ?P, td q~ ~ ~`a^ T~ { ti cif Yi. . » t"°,m,b, • _ °y:` U F~ `51',s pa' r. -U,'--. .•arrn ,1. 3.,, r .~r°E .Ke.c G• >'F.:` , tv ~ i, ;nr--" : t,:, n ,'~','~r^'.<. a'.I', - '3r ,`fiat'"..+kr . ^ = d F V i , ~vrt- ° :G., .*:~'r '"i'.,,,~i.,, +,Y •Yr,= S., a Sn n t4~ ya,=•"+x ...1.- •i~{, r hw S s,.,yArri..:'r}` k r1, Y c:s~'. .r-><~ . 'C . ~ „i $Y.? :<r' ~r "~Y3a c ,r-., sr rk .rr.7 a,,t, ' ? 4K '1- its a, i„ ?>r4r" sF. a•,,; , s y ",fir;. n• w ~ka£."• r µ`<cc i 'n.•'~` r*>1a`c: a . J;k«' ,I i.L dae 't =n r r- r. •:x ~ .s^A. F° k>~~'. e+ .yJ ..x'~~= :'va,' Y .s "~'-•r ~"S':'x`s. ,"s.i: vc~. MIN 4 ~ X'., < . A F:4 ' „,.?°0.'•,', r ~ r `dnk.." ~''.ls . ,r~ -d: . ~ ~3 .4 r? ' a ' ~4., w'"~~ , ti~f*;' .'f". ~::a' „¢,-"`A'.` .vi: • .tr~F'i~ ~s H., , . «k. > ~.E xr a :;r.~ . ! 7.? fi. ^¢s r t d`~z ~""a •*T ~ x i'S 'fir , z.,^ ~ . 9f ,'r d ^A.r -:.`fM~~ rvx-EL s s « ~ - , ~ Er r y'e'a.. -.1:• ~ 'r ° " ' *•-ws - t.k .k+,' Sx .M+»-' ";i°e ^.,u N 9 .?irn .r r~:Al-°a*t 4a:,•'#. .^na- ,'nr',- x:rv"r',AS s3"-.= r 4. :rv ,rk rA k{, . ',s. .u " Y, Ji` . ".,Ufay~°t,r 'S` .^1., a,le.~, °'••5x LY ~a:'` '4, ~••,h'{ip -dy))- tP' ' ,,*•.f :tie . ~ 7• 'ism k-xi;." r~J.i^a . `4 °'sk a.,Y.Ha. d rte' V':".d';"y t1x, r 4.~ tf.. ri5'.. .4 .r9~-: 5""-',.~" E, y' "ti gip. s_~' w vrc . ,.Aley, "~:ox --,"N.~>~.,,~r.,,.~, ~.,~....:n..,.>.3-§,~,S,.,s~.rz:,al`Y'-.: ,.•>a,~ ,a~,,..,,.,.., r' `.'"^~;t~k'.,-, ra~.ac•..~. -r,~,_v >,~i•..><-,-art°'~;.".,,sw,h , ,a„a<. .,:~a~:,.'~sao§,:...~_~<.:a,~,1.„r~~~.";Ax•z~:~..?,,.,•'~.~•rare:~...,~~a~aw`'.~r.r..F~<ri.-r.,,,..'d'aa r,`rs~~:-.-., g - G 11 ;i !E 'z'3 t+cwsr` 3§ r .Ta:-- -x..,..: - '"l' -x - , ...r k ' q 0V _34~ ~ r h. 4 s _ ° _ r 7 tZ l,i~3a rd ~ ~ 41 ~ - f _ Y'.'x-+'2 ~4 1, . "Ian, e 1' ~ { r 4 p - -P. n £-rsi '4- - - ,s > a:• r a F r '=€,i f;a+~,4d~}z''~• Gv ,.g,.r'a'~ k g 2 s 2, j _ Y' L t xv ...f. ~ ,.aX ^6 2. ' ¢ se~ 1-11 ? _ - - M r t b # ; I * 1 l 9,F $ _ .fipT p qr4 4 • ~a.>°k& i ,tZ -,+ij , Yad ~s~ rS"rr`s., '`a c .r - b4 - t s - `s.r`", c't` v'#`rt'a'w. i r Y r ~i y z'i r Y,+ - - _ ^1 .r - ;k, g _ , a~ `,i -3r 'Ill fW z 2 s 4 ~}€S~~ i , ~ N I 1-1.1 MEN, I IN (dote: Items underlined are assodatM with the Councils Goals or are Mme; $ r k 'I- scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) s* n ~ - M; rF r4'.y ~'e. L,`'F <'zs' •i„a± Y ° L 3>;=`, 'i. Date: June 11, 1996,; Ls.t Z ;r Ya p. s p,k T + P ~ Type: Business (TV) to ~ . ~v start rime: 6:30 p.m. Study Meeting • { ; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting k ~ . 1 } 1 .v r r:? - s s a F a ~ - Study Session: s € rr 11 > Agenda Review .ka4ya~a w .kk.~~... ;r,~. _ ~.h y~~ a s~ .t Consent Agenda: r ij ` ~ h ~ & ~ 11 N > Approve Council Minutes z ` ~ . Vl, an cs & It-1 x - r " + Business Nestling: 1 a - x.., r 11, " > Public Hearing -Budget (Resolution) (Wayne) s',~ ~ s .:i ~ #r " 11- _ F > Public Hearing - State-Shared Revenues (Resolution and Ordinance) - .W ~ ~ a2 - k 1 r `G' 34 3Y`f a. r _ (Wayne) :~E+YY;gw? Cr > Public Hearing -CPA 96-0003 (Legislative) Regarding ABECO/Cox a (Wetlands Density Transfer //g~els > Public Hearing - Capital Improvement Program - Budget adoption ~ > Public Hearing -Zone Change - ParSdson (Bay) 4~ " € 4 " " I 3 2! dM * ~ , } r~ ~ f E a > c r 11 -M, j 0Z k t ffi r ' s" 'thy d. Y . Z 1 < 9 , ' fit` A.. S - vim' Y' ~F oaf-r 's }g'`°'''"' a s - y, _ ! _ - urn. 'v'r -Kx -r _ k a ? # s .T'r 3, X-, k y Y r "t ' Y aa~'I" C t t "fir: _ _ .,c, stfisy-Sri` - r rF, t r y ` 1- i ` - -'i T}w~ 3-y r c } k , - E- i~ 1'a f - rr c 'r~ 4 w y 1 { . T^P' g~ r 1" 'r y, x r`* v r i a , 3 ~ - G fi ~ ,-,e`aY y"y * -,tai+'€'e -1i s - 4 _ x fix ~~r~ s .t - f., t ,t F~ J j° x, rt fit TI - > - w A f3 # 1 C - # - -1 1- - Mw - I ~ I - - ~ _ . Y ~ ':s 1 - L - Ott ie+9e ieiadS2I 1-:-i a±YVt_.. N zs ,3 a S - 1 k' - 7d f'„;us ,4 €k~,N 'xc ,y s+"K '1," - , rk 5 r s 4 1 t ~ a. g as s S "a' '-i i' ri 'f gy'm' YF~II # 5- ! f a~ S i ~ off{ A , ~a d s-r- 5 Z i s t j s Y p- C V \9"i A ~Y "e 4_, { ;...._<..~......w,..__..... u.._. 4L^v,'^ y,_. 2a' ~ A$+i., _ hwzs.~w :tiwv pvt... xY ,pa'.~..,'„Y-Z'• s fix'' v~~lf d - Ewa ~x ax 4 (Note: Items underlined are associated with the Council's Goals or are ! " P ~ ~ ` } scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) x Date: June 18, 1996 x Type: Workshop (idoTV),,, ,1111 -n sue.".. 4°' ~t 9 Start Tune: 6:30 P.M. z F , ~ ".5; N, 3, i Workshop Meeting Topics: '~4- U- j . 1 w rte,-' 41F > (:I1 Communications (Liz) $ > Update: Metro 2040 (Jim) X~ Y , I 1, f > Status: City Council Goals (13d1) Sys ~ ~ f _ k ; Mkt > Finalize Long-Range, Short-Range Space Plans and Evaluate Funding s,". ~ , (determine agenda date for formal adoption (Liz) ` { 1', t > Charter Revisions: Review Staff Proposal. Schedule date for public A , ~ Wt = e'- ,f hearing. (Cathy) . _z M ~ > Develop City's Direction for the Downtown Area (Jim) a ; r 1. mss{ > Discussion: Reactivate Homeless Task Force - Develop a Plan by # ; F September to Address Problems of Tiigard's Homeless (Bill) k ° r R-r`x t?.r > Community Partnersf"AffordableHousing-Update(ShenaGreenlaw- kn . x F.) s. f, a __r I . < rz~ k Sri ,I k id's 7--1-1 • z ' 11 "j _ f '~j - ) 11 ~ -,15i ' ref rt ~Y~ -Vo ' c~ - 5.1 ri, ¢ a- g , -I15,, v r 2, t [ sue- -+,,-r "''+x r ,z~' -3 s K~~ K~.~ i „x_ ~x i .y..b r f s `~'~1 5 E',-01- ,sE x r -"Al Y-~ *s T k 4 '.h. ..n .sra3 w.i, a...•...".5~.se.~ 4 K°}-rte `4', }S -rr~ 4'tr v~ - p" 4 K 2 gym 1 41 - 21a. , t i8'h e'1- a x r -1 I- 't3 , r . . - .~--Inc Y.if{ r fi t, - _ t - - _ _ .s K`~^ -z` ' x-'~ a a 1 i - : L-e"k -1~ - ~ , ~ ~~O~l r -1, ' - - - ~ ~L ~r ~ ~ , - . . I - , : - - : , 2-i ~1~ ~ %,4 t ~ ~ f 12 , , , - , , - ' - , ' , , a qtr I. j x w 6 r. si r., . - r d 1~ % 1 - "N yd ~ $ is' 1 g - S c4 Ay'r' - r r J ! s f - r z ,j 'x'' ,r r E ~ ,.l qjU 'mot 4+ `2. S j ~ J T V Ti S4°'eY hall mr, 11 5-11135T41 --Mw L _51 acv}r'`-r`r.x.~xxa' A~ ggs (Mote: Items underlined are associated with the Councils Goals or are 201 scheduled to follow-up a Council matter or request.) 'U c SFr # Date: June 25, 1996 'g q~ 4s, q 2 - zVi Type: Business (TV) r 3~y¢ x ?r`-d tv"4ic t?' F to i3t,~#' cry, p Start rune: 6:30 pan. Study Meeting r 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting t a E3 z z Study Session: N t Consent Agenda:i ° > Approve Council Minutes n p, Business Meeting:~~ z t;; s , r~ N z > DEQ Presentation on Transportation Standards - (10 minute video; 10 p v minute discussion) - Mina DeConcini from DEQ (229-6788)s,,~ , f S= ` > Public Hearing: CPA 96-0002 - AKA Business (Ray Valone)~ 3 > Consider IGA with Washbi n County Reeardin Areas in Ti •s gard 4 A. # Urban Growth Boundary, F 5 #5 _ - R A. RY" ME KUP S - Yap "tae's- ~-IrRM-Nd I ON wed rg' 5 7i a r - car #a§ ~ sx" sl~ 77777 _WL 7'31 y V'g r r i S f x h t~kl r~"}£i t` y?k, Y&. -,-rte 751L, % A- 1f r d 1Yj ~~V" R - 4 ~ ; - - - - fi " _ 5' .-qh r x q 00 41 I,r ~k~,,~ - - , I : - , , , , , , ~ -7, , , , : . ~ , - ~ : - Z` - ~ " , ~ - ~4_.~~ "I _,"rl- I iq~.~~,~ ~~',':j A R _ ' 4 x 'CY - - _ -J5' - X 4 X c c 1- y y-S K Y _ - - 'r NTf c Sr,,-_ T 'za `f t - . e..nav uANCt lAytb- n- ' .P t l F x + t A [ x l Ia- fit- r , _ IT, EnrS PENDING - DATES TO BE SCHEDULED - w ~ ~ a s r ® Transportation Comprehensive Plan Chanrtes (Jim) £ [ r'~ y ' n x m - - - 4 4 s • Surface Water Quality Treatment Facilities - Staff Report on F _ r ,c , Information Re-guested by Council on September 1995 (Engineering s . r Dept.) 4 ate -tS® >°i f ty,R OPEU Contract Negotiations -approval of new contract (Sandy) • Dartmouth LID Financing Hearing (Gary, Wayne) _ FS ?aew f ] • Items to be scheduled after City V-uicmn Statement process is completed ` " I by Couno7:'mr k. I } > > • Half Street Improvement Policy (Engineering) 4 _ 11 . r - January 1997: v,-4y, ak ".f:;% • Develop Annexation Policy; especially for island areas (Jim) - `"!'w • Integrate Council into Computer System (Paul DeBnryn) p4 ~ , • Develop Long-Term Water Resources (Ed, Bill) # '1- 4 x ~ 11 1.11 f o Review City's Street-Light Policy (Engineering) { - • Schedule Council Goal Setting Session . : r ~t 1, A _ - 'i- , f ' x - 4M> - June 1997: • Rewrite Tigard Development Code - Bafferie~ (Jim) - Z ~ - [ h • Engureering Fees (Engineering Dept.) 4 • Finalize Visioning Process - Implement (Liz, Loreen) T • Evaluate Use of Traffic Calming Devices - S.W. North Dakota ~ ~ L ~ ~ - ; ~vf .c _ (ERO~neCrrnO) 4 'y'''vs,'da E - 3 • Finalize Sewer Extension Program (Engineering) , $ g W K " _ 11 I Ongoing (as needed) ~r r r 'MN , r' • Consider Issues of Affordable Housing Y> F ' • Support Passenger Rail Service Planning through Tigard - ¢ ; f • Define/Develop Tgard's Approach to Working/Dealina with Metro - ` , * , • Secure Longlerm Water Suppiv r Y Y r 2i . k R - , [ T -I } Note: } l ,i CIT facilitators and resource teams meet with Council for 1 hour at the work r v session meetings in January, April and September. ~ : I ~ r t a R Ali Workshop Meetings - schedule a time for CIT updates and Metro 2040 - P ¢ r s r E UpdaLeS. - r t r r f h.Vogio\othy\anh8en r '~^x € 4 - A.~X Y S § h' 1 Y j -k _ - -'7 _ Y~; x `d-j , , hw I " e- r r "I,,_-`-;, ~ , " '.'4~~`A 1_,14, n;i, At"~r'fiY - A - rM'--MU.' .11 - - P - i ..rF' h 4-_ - - _ tltl k t V 6 A Y 'Y '%__:P: L Y- i a t ~,:""',;~~j,~,~ 12 ~ - , _ _ } ! - T J A ~r ,y - - t ~ r , , - ! r y Y ; -Cyw- - S n {kk- 1 P m t1 a. j t~ r 1- - ry - - C _ _~w..~ ~ 9.~.~ 4 r fem. x f - t~ - xs-Lr -~.x Fi ~x n - it -2 4x ---s._ L• y r s ra e- r A h w r e . _ _ {fit ra; r ~r#y, ; '~r+'tg - .a.,.., _-:~«:t»~k - _..u_... ® L ~ ~y 11, TW -17 1 r I "f-j,~ fit; g k 2 ~ 404; ` AGENDA ITEM # 3 3 t "1_ 1„ , ~ f'}f,. 1 For Agenda of 51 I 1I I Rto , . ' trya CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f a - - _ . L i r y, - Y`,y~k "'dab. r COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ti 4 , Ly ; u ~ i~ aa- Y r - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Appoint M. JoAnn Hayes to Act a City Recorder in Certain Circumstances & ¢ -E' PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK M ,s; - - r r ~ k r' , _ . ISSUE BEFORE THE O IN I , i t PP Y P n tY perform ~ 'I Mew the ftmctions of that office during absences or s a :..y unavailabie of the . , t ty City Recorder. 7.?;+ i 1 ~ Via: STAFF RE,COMMENDATION 4 st ~0', - Adopt the attached resolution. ' r b k a Y INFORMATION SUMMARY 4 a , ~I Q x " L tr ¢ MS _ Currently, Liz Newton is named as the De u Cit Recorder =gyp r r Pty Y (Resolution No. 89-81). Staff proposes that due changes in circumstances; that is, Liz Newton is now the Assistant to the City Administrator and Jo Hayes is the c ' 'z it ~ , ' 4 x La Executive Assistant to City Administration, that Jo Hayes be named as the Deputy City Recorder. it cj f* a M ~ WAZ , 1 mt v T x-~ t a The duties of the Deputy Recorder include all those duties normally performed by the City Recorder during her " I x:_`, absence or unavailability. Examples of duties include: monitoring the tentative agendas, preparing final agendas, =mar, 10 s' attending City Council meetings to take notes, and performing follow-up action after a Council meeting. In ~~~',n4 addition the Deputy Recorder may be called upon to act as the Elections Official and certify City records if the - City Recorder is absent or unavailable. , -Sy tip' ~"$7,~$~ 4n - ? The attached resolution also appoints the Administrative Services/Court Manager as the Deputy City Recorder for " ~ ` , Z F court-related purposes. This represents current practice and was also a part of Resolution No. 89-81. F x ~re r y J > ~ I a a t( t FISCAL NOTES k 1,"- N - ~ # 'i' .(tLZ+ rI & x.- - iW.I' hf'm~+M+ndem«dx ri%F, ~-3- - "S 1 1 4...-.€k2-C_' ~.Ll _ , x~ -.,f5 z4« yj, ga u s 1P ,1 , f~ J ~ jk' 4a~^' F F _ y e j- *wc r.ra•.5r°it ^s*1 - '4. ~r r.-. Fxr 'z'•54 ~ x',r'G`~id, t [LY W. c < ` "`"+C r S _ cwt, - ~ 7 - M,l ~ , ~ - I -.17,1 " 1,- - F W ~ ~ sir-max . , - + r- ~ ~+'~y.° d did s ' a ~..Fs v , r' r r~ - , st`d rr Fj ~ s s'' y P - - s- # b4 P-vk rh r:._ t3, # zy n ~ i ',r - gig .w ~.q5= a u - ♦ n - ' a- t!` -r { + ! - - ( e r s s YIp^- ! 1tF j_ iiit-... y # F k l fi _ - , q:" . ~ , . , I ~ ~ I . ~ I ~ , I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ . . . ~ I ,1 .11- ~ , _ .1 I , r - r ~ M - 'a 4 ' v r X x a t S s > i 411, ~..~T, r rz ,l~yg _ jt r a a s m, R i - , r"3 i e ~yd;1 `F fit`' t- _ _ _ _-r ry%,: , z c~se;7-r I, '"~'r I , t "Y~3 `Yfl A; Y 4i " -Y}3' vi S1✓ r "Y _ '%-r:`t a€.+ t, . -~et^' - °i -G - -4 ECrt Y - 't a~ 4 fi- k 'J N' °i+'~"'jr• '~*s.a~ _...s.a.~ i rt,-'t ,lF°t1 m I- 11 -41 ~ AGENDA ITEM # -3 • ''1 j ~ z 1N GC9`' max.}r Z ` i~p z ForAgenda of 5 r - I t111:14'11 - # f#NF_f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - - z€ ~V"k COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY l K ; 3b , -A_;,~4 -9 , ~ _ - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Resolution Adopting d Use Api2li i °zx ,1' ~ r r t t z , s, ~ r 3. i ~ ~ PREPARED BY: Dick B. DEPT HEAD OK /CITY ADMIN OK WV I k k , 4!0!1 - ` ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL ; r h - z ¢ . x fiz Should the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing new land use application fees? g 'x + n s: s$'z $3F' - H - A , r i STAFF PFCC ra F.ItiTDATiQN "I . a - 3 fig, ro 1 - 2 7 i v"-_ It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution and fee schedule. , a y ~1 r , s INFORMATION SUMMARY 5_{w a d k, F This fiscal year the Community Development Department conducted a cost analysis of land use application fees. At = - ~ ~ , , ,xMN4 1 The City Council reviewed the study and proposed fees at its meetings of February 20, 1996 and April 23, 1996. . „ e, T :`1 The City also held an open house and invited over 50 developers and builders to discuss the proposed fees. The ' City's present fee schedule recovers only 30 percent of the cost of processing land use applications. The proposed . t t;,.,; _1 1 1, t rA ' fee schedule is targeted to recover 100 percent of the cost of processing land use applications and reduce the < z ' z Ili t t : , burden on the general fund. At its April 23, 1996 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a resolution x s L adopting the proposed fee schedule. ' #s3" ' OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED A> ;#'~4 ~ I 11 { 1. No change in the existing fee schedule. ,I f s - ' - i c _ 2. Phase the fee recovery over a number of years. _5 t z x - i a j 3. Choose a different recovery rate. Mk r 'j a , A, x { Y - y -r- - t FISCCA NOTES :t,;! ~ W .,1 k ti f The proposed fees are estimated to increase revenue over $142,000 and reduce the costs supported by the public f a \ F - ~ through the general fund. - 1. ffi_ t Yy tF ~,,i u -Vp _ .r ~ - * r v - Ir.y rte' a ~ `~S i 7 d r - fP a aansvs a~ rte' +..a "''.i s ' u~ z } - rsx F" 4~,? r 1 £ t e g' 1 -y- t ,3r- ~F , E 1. I M ~ r m,r r t I'll I 's ~ r -Y C t 3h tyE f 1 i -1 Y R 1 =13 t K '1 i P ' . ' 4 .'^'T-rre-:°,-nom.- ' +cu-;,;. 1'czy' { L'w" +rm -i c t' r .tea a^'~'v{' s - 11 - . _ + 2i- I Fr 4s _ _ _ - - - _ _ -.t n !~r t - - - - - tt -t wx ✓s - { A rx _ µ t { <~..r rte, 7 - a _ 5 F, r - - -}fi F %m 5 C 'f Yi t - - - - , F '°'i N 3 zti t i - f , syiZK 4 3 k y d - - 1 z s S - - a --n k k , i r - ' -"'r x I .11 - , i - - t _ a x at : - s M a+.,es. 410 w i N"Ia,R3 "-c 1 r - - p _ * r5e,. 'k.+ r - t -e.."-..GS' M.L.. .,tea- 2 s`,3 ^ .'fsi S zs e" .I`z k ti - - ' rk 1 ~ ea . Sa'h' t } a~ v t - i-ar5' -ui W' , _ _ rt ix,n s, ,'C _ - _ "'l- ,r R- s - S ~t ~i t i+ .ens....-.~..-',u..,..r.~... 7-- ,~{a,,.,j i~nxg 1 ~ It ,~5 - 7 ?'WL C,, 19§'7d ' s a ~ , ~ - x ~ a AGENDA ITEM # 3- 5 , ~ -a ~ " ; '-e# _ ~ ~ For Agenda of MU-14,1996 _ `f } ® ' _ ' i. - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f', , _ 11 i-u.-St.,ie4 z- .d ' y w COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ` 4 W - a 7 1 ' ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Acquisition ofRi -gz PREPARED BY: G Alison C°.in DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK , - Wig . ,t. r_ -zr- ate, - L - . J - yr t`s l~ zit-'z"n 4"j• t' 11 I W 11.6- Vi i a- K ISSUE BFFORF THE COUNCIL ~ V w - Z Y 1- Approve acquisition of right of way required for the Ross Street realignment. itg - -#~3.,~N - STAFF D l~O~t~m { . r 3 - r ..F. NDA T ivi3 r t } ` Approve the agreement with the property owner to acquire the right of wa and authorize the City Administrator to ~ jr g T. sign the reimbursement form. y ~ ~ _ - * r INFORMATIONSUMMARY e , x - t r ' ~ I x j Ross Street needs to be realigned to intersect directly across from Sattler Street at Hall Blvd' We are proposing to ' e ra , r` a - acquire the right of way necessary for this realignment. Construction of the roadway would be a condition of € xr 1. - 4r z l development for the property. An appraisal was made of the proposed right of way and determined the value to be - $48,000. An agreement was reached with the property owner for $49,915 which is 4% over the appraised amount. ~ The negotiator and I believe that this is appropriate and recommend approval of the agreement. See the attached' #1; ` }1 ~ letter from the negotiator and agreement signed by the properly owner. k ` 111T. . s g -i 4 ti - i S 1 OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .M ~z - ~ 11 FISCAL NO TES - , t - k f ` ' , The funding has been included in the CIP budget for the past couple of years. $33,000 was appropriated in this 11 .1 K* r ' years budget and the remaining $17,000 will be appropriated from committed projects in the 1995/96 budget. "h'~ . r,,." . ,7'al , 4 - - 4-- x txt h rr p s 4 1_ t ~t --r' 'Y t it , { ~,7 yI.,G3f$~'~i 41 { °w A~_ y~ f -.w.,s a t ~a - ' - P J - ' '~a~ F 'I ~ . £ LuaY..aal.-, a , , ti."~ 'lz'~ ~ds'e {~dG. Yuji :;2" r r - t , - -fix, g' Y . f - a»..~.:.,. 'r a`,-r~ £ a r' " $i` t ' wr is _ h R .~,.,lts v ix c L 3' €a7'£' Y,s 3, - f id y y r S f .r x w, wl,wy x` I - 6r afi 1 s $t a a - - - J - ! - t} - r, ,,.a a -k _ . V i M1 ? ; - :T;~,4,~~" , ~ -~Z ~X!,~ i'~~ ~,t . ir, , ,~,~-,,~7:~-:,.~,,,,,,, , ; , - ~ ol , , , - - - L I 5 , R ~ r~,Z, __,t~ f, r ~ 1, - ` ~ __1 ~ 11' ~ , " , ` __`1 , - , ' " , - ~ - - , , - , ~ , 7 , .W , I _J . ~ _ _ _ ¢ { ' ti- , _-11`_'1___1'~""1" "Ll"I"111, M - I I , I ~ . I , ~ , , - - , , - ~ ~ , ~ 'r., . , ' ' ~ - r . - , F 1 ? _ I -N hx'.s~"1` a.'ta' c 3 i z- ka n~'fa... t 3 yW. 2 r.~, t ,,nom.-`.+-az ,a ~1 _ y t _ ` - s i ea,°r„ is yp~` r+~ s W f r t i- a- t ry y Y -a ,5 _ / _ i`~r aft S4f '`3.?x- e s - t y, " 4, 11 Sp - 3i'F,+Pw F p c 4~ykr ° p0s~l 1-0 11 E rY a ~r,.,. HANNA, MCELDOWNEY & ASSOCIATES x,+.' y°"R APPRAISAL - ACQUISITION -RELOCATION [ "y - - _ 2U I ~~m'r , i - ~ -1-1 I 'l , I", ~ ',a N NI. 4 ' " -i ~ 4'Y -if #&-u' -s3. 2.}-„, "§sYSS.'s? C ys'A~ -t«+- A ~4 } ?e t.1 ~§'j°yfl'' , s N ,'3 P. i E~ ; ~ t -ms's I' "r y ~ , a - April 29, 1996 0 ~ ~ 11 Gary Alfson, PE ~ ~ 1 ~y- x a Project Manager a s$ W:, xW Harper Righeliis, Inc. 4 s . 5200 S.W. Macadam #580 x _i i k f ~'I a y Portland, OR 97201 Cy ks g r eta . I cy x , Subject: Ross Street/Sattler Realignment, Tigard, Oregon -McDonald Property r~~ A ` -3?s Enclosed are documents covering the negotiation and acquisition of the McDonald pronerty for I'll . the project listed above. These documents include a Warranty Deed, Letter of Agreement and - ~ t ? t",b a Diary of Personal Contacts with Mr, and Mrs. McDonald. , . 1 _ r~ a~.~ x ~t~ . -kip _ i 1i A negotiated settlement was made for the amount of $49,915.00. This amount exceeds the rs - .1-1- ; :Is I& 2 - "I - = appraised amount of $48,000.00 by $1,915.00 which is less than a 4 .Y.. ; 7 - percent increase. `z;, . `r r ' r Mrs. McDonald had requested a copy of the sales used to value their property. After reviewing ':.~5-,, 'N R ~,g'-.il ,l ' the sales and talking with a neighbor who had been offered $100,000.00 per acre for his Wv ,r~ ' , f property, they asked that the unit value for their property be increased to that amount. Mrs. € ~ cn ` ti e'ti 3 i ,t ,v McDonald said the most current sale used in the appraisal was a November 15, 1995, which v goy " - _r <Agr A_ ,L r indicated a per acre value of $89,374.00 and that price of land had been going up since that _ ~-T {Z,lj -r k date. The offer was based on the appraised unit value of $84,000.00 per acre. I explained that I ~ 4 4 the appraiser had looked at all sales used in the appraisal to value their property and he had -I made adjustments for the date of sale and had considered the shape, size and possible dedication r~ t I tnt v t bd~ . Y '~$v -x requirements to arrive at the estimated per acre value of their property. I discussed the 4 !26_551, w X dedications required for streets from their property before it could be subdivided. I explained - that right-of-way dedications and street improvement requirements reduce the overall selling 1 - price of undeveloped property. After some discussion, the McDonalds agreed to sell their r r . property based on the November, 1995 sale (Sale No. 6) used in the appraisal report. . 1 , I , ~ Tk I.I ta],j It is recommended the City of Tigard accept the negotiated settlement as submitted. ~ a 1.'' * s j y, r s 5- M '*?6 g,~ le a " Contact me if you have any questions. 4 ~ x~ r t _ * _ Sincerely, I 4 su k g a -g'• G' ,-.,a _ t a- tea, . " ~ x Marvin McEi owney, Agent ; ~"~>1}E _ xs q 2y _ it e r "V 1 i 8835 S.W. CANYON LANE 11405, PORTLAND, OR 97225 - (503) 297-9588 FAX: 297-2835 - ',-yf - k 2 i _ ter-- r LJt . Yi' .st - 7- 7 'sx~ -ro-,.~- 1-.-<~ - ra gI1EZ'+~4~v .t _ t r x - - - a s x s'h'y. B a < r 5 ~ Im - .1 ,Qss ~ ~ , _,r, . , s, MR.* , `La 6 t f f r'Y 1- _ s Pr 1 IIa' ] o -u s ~w - a _ , ~ , 4r } is _ 4 , i -,^,~,-;-""","-,-,~,L-r".~e'~ , s s~,'i:~, - , , , , , ~ ~ j s: ~ , ~ , , , I - 1 ~ ~ t - _ . ° _ - - - 3 YI 4 E k. L Yt 'TIL - t4~ -L > 1+- _ 5 , 77 ,'ti tit „'1FE _a +h 'E a r < i -r 5- r f ''.s-' 'X' - j, ti .+&ae { $Sx- s- ~ , r. ~ s _ r -'F• x r "`'`z~' r%3"" *t y s w f ag$ 11 ' _ h- i. t x -k - -tr-%Y F~-,- -a Est $ - _ - - _ y. i~ e f 4 b # L& aft n~'fX'..1w, 1~v-4 3 41 #xx `k; - 2P-'a -ai ~ s s _ r -f _ ' r .4' SC. r a 1115 eG g 1 "I ' III C-b s ~6M~ si"' t"'k{+~".. ~..~s.a''"`a'x: n`1...,^~"f*__"v e:t -M1 ® spy" '11-t <s"iv'fi. sx+„e P '4 Y & ASSOCIATES . . HANNA, MCIJLDOWNE =S ~~s APPRAISAL - ACQUISITION -RELOCATION 143`' ' t k c 'f k~_ zl = - , x T7 M r' (M ~ ~kk rApri125, 1996 ParcelN: 1-McDonald TMx ~ ~g _ 'T .7A - z_ -Y Lynn B. and Monica R. McDonald z~ 11 I ..l ~r rFU g - ~ ~ 8340 S. W. ROSS Street ' t ~ 14i a Tigard, OR 97224 ',t - * a y ¢ r - --j Subject: Agreement for a negotiated settlement for the purchase of property for the Ross - " ,i 1-1 ekc R -T,"'"" Street/Satler Street realignment project - City of Tigard, Oregon U`%^ ' • ° [ " I I-` E I ~ r ~ Dear Mr. and Mrs. McDonald: S , _ The City of Tigard is planning the acquisition of right-of-way for the Ross Street realignment '2I.~ - 5' r 4,~„ project. As you are aware through our discussions, property you own which will be needed for s, r this project. A Warranty Deed will be necessary in order to give the City of Tigard title to the ,-g - , ' K r r property needed for the realignment of Ross Street. . - - a.`t.'s` - - .-.-fit-P $ t ti- t S r ^xr5' 'ye f J, 4 y;-r~J In exchange for executing the documents and granting the above rights, and subject to approval, " ) - %r a the City agrees to the following: y `s- < . I- d i. To compensate you, in full, for the Warranty Deed in the amount of $49,915.00. ~ 110 . t ' -4 x -I -J ~tSi, .wYF 2 4 5 , = -4- " { : 2. To pay all closing costs. 10 - 9 _ z ~ , ' The total compensation for the property required for the project is $49,915.00. Upon acceptance ~ ~ r - by the City, payment will be made in approximately 60 days. Thank you for your cooperation F 16~~ 11 with the City of Tigard. . d t - r ~a~m i ,r ; Sincerely, /L//~ $Y 3 - ~ 'SX, . K93~ -1 - ~ I " r Marvin McEldowne, A ent rx 4 7 r , s Y g Lynn B. McDonald x , 4 1 f Monica R. McDonald - g~t ~ ~ xr F` tixtv'~ as ~c.,r4 s a -r pc: Gary Alfson, P.E. & xt hk- Senior Project Engineer ;t'` t r y t a: 4-A _ - i Z , i - 8835 S.W. CANYON LANE #405, PORTLAND, OR 97225 - (503) 297-9588 FAX: 297-2835 - - yf ~ s ~ ~ -rk- ~k~ x- e r - No- a-i°??,tr~a-Pr'F= s.~.-.r, - a ~`rrrfi {rT x - l d - u,' { r l - A ,x+.%~•^£ ~4~-am ~Jt 5~'x tt%.rY'„w;,..,r~xifUea j w - x l; 4~ Fa, c t a- f` f~ $ y y --e ' S ' r m St - g::~e~h'~+t- zf - 1 r rr% S' 4 "'4, T'w't{ `k- ~'.-bY i - t - _ k x r 3 ea4 4k - _1 a t x 7-- . 1 . u 'x.T. =ate - - z _ :j I S L - r} 7 Y"~. dig S(;;k.`v~s.~ ?"t , _ - v 's ,-~.r: A -K k 1'~> as - 5" ~'y t `t -'f -r l _ _ - - -y\-'i'n's` y~ K, A p '.sc .re`.3.5' r - ' i. i i - t 2' N - 1,` I 7s4 k-M£. ' T', r Y.t.4 v 4,d.,y. sc.tY ® t $ c w z Mgt:. - _ F 4 AGENDA ITEM # u' s r . "L ` 4 * 3 For Agenda of 5/14/96 I _ t,- r ~ k CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r L' h ~ - ` js ' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARYtz ku;s ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Visioning Process Details or --Turd -Thinking Beyond Tomorrow 1 i - r' a a s PREPARED BY: Newton & L. Mills DEPT HEAD OK 7. nnyv- r ITY A^' .,,vut~ vn in~ci i t ; n - z7 _ i ~s ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL ~ ° - ~ W Does Council unanimously support the attached process as the way to achieve Tigard's visioning to determine the iE~~ future of Tigard as a community? . , ] ,~--~-R~,,_,~-_,,_,,~'~ ~ - , t STAFF RECOMMENDATION x 71 F ` Staff recommends Council authorize a 20-month community `1~v~; - -wide process to develop a plan for the future of the Tigard community, or a process of "thinking beyond tomorrow." Et F " `~G~ it ty a - a $;o:. . ....A. i 1 . t e ' INFORMATION SUMMARY ~rf;'~ " " y Since last Fall, Council has reviewed various options for a process to obtain direction from the community about 1 `M , y y - ~,i~~l.'."~:~~'I'Ll~l-r~~C7.5~ r what it sees as Tigard's future. Each week decisions are made by the Mayor and Council, Tigard boards and ~ 3 a» , ~ ~ § j r committees, and City staff that affect the future of our community. When a visioning process is completed, fixture ?.;W r~ ti { actions taken by Tigard's policy and decision-makers can be measured against the results of this review. 3zk ~ - F To conduct a successful process to develop the Tigard of tomorrow, staff strongly urges Council to support the f~ 5 ' ~ 't w _ processwithaunanimousvote.~ ~ s . _ am, rcY, Attached in this packet are: a suggested timeline, detailed description of each of the 6 phases of the process and the original budget proposal and a revised budget. r^~ 1 F as - f, ~ - rs x `rE~- 41 - OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED % s, " 1. Conduct periodic surveys of citizens, as we have in the past with - "Tigard Talks" and share information with f ~ ~ 3 j } City decision-makers. ~v _ -11 2. Conduct a broad-based community-wide input process, along with a survey to develop Ti ard's plan for the , = g ' a x j€ x p future. ;K - s t , ` 3. Council to give further input. z n r 1 FISCAI. NOTES a - ~ ~ I _ a 1. $6,500 is budgeted in 95/96 for the next "Tigard Talks" survey. ? r "s ~ 4, y , 2. $55,900 is anticipated for this process in 96/97 with the use of an intem to assist staff with the process. This ,Vs ~ . _ , L does not include City staff time working on the process. x g r~ X 3. Unknown. h n3 a 5~ E r r d '`i - , - I' - F E`t. z -v , y r' Im/ms/ansum dm _ , y 9 4' . sc 4 ~t~.4 `f PS 9'"~c -J I - - - K ' b r L '*'wy.f 'e.,( S _ -1 ~ - SAS ~ 1,11 - t # f f Yc - - -`4,, ~ fit, } c. E , e rx .v. r_ -ati~ a _s ~.i , ~,.rre+,,a~r""-;-,'... +,..+~rc..r k * t'a ~s Y,,za'saj r _ F: j a i`_ r} t - -r, ' # i - gA -b - - , ~1'i. rf Y 1 5 I L F I t - - 2 % T d_ - --t ~n_ ~ ~ '12 ~ L m; r 3 ra .fir n # 7L .?v F€ 1 i IL S - 3 4 _ - b.~. 3- 4 Z ! MM 4 - - -1 t r r I , w " tea. . = I mmm~mr I i - - ~ rt sl73 F.`l ~kf }a~:-~ a 't Fl, ,.'~E ri I 1 h c 4 a r~ky ~?i, ip ' 1 t r> 1- e~},`~'~s ,,7 x110 I f t `lY I r t , ,c s i7 v~. 2~'~~ p t W ® ` , - '4 . a i:atm ri`j:• ,S'; is°§ Lt N c , ~ r - ` .,.,,m.'- ' ,ar 'a~W. ' t ,p': ` 7.'~<.> 3 -.,r„ ~ u ,r a 3,!• ~ ,:`e ''.a(3.: •,s'•t - ,s..' '1•.;kd,"4z r .,#i • 9~ - air r 1' u•* 3,ir ' •rr. rta+2r_, , ,Y e>t•„^.r. , a :r. a ar"...:5~~u ,.'~",P, ~s ,Mtaa r ,a~ . ~x~'`"P~~,`r~~. i. .:<,~.5-•,., ~~~~'~~:r. a " ~ r• <"~=:~s5~: "'t`:~:,.~,. ,,t.,~'. .a.. u'~' w, r t'^a, ~st ,r ...~t,tr~. . -~.`9 ~ r~,~^.k~ : _ .,ice "Lw ~s„'" .=x;5^.t"3'"~-~;'~~ `..d »n'._ 'c.>`,;,, =,'r - ~r,~ • . . s<. sg` 4 ~E.f Cr : wyw ' .,s"7., >r N,, fit... ~ c`~ % ~ : ~`~a,%~` r" _ 4 #c~ haa• ~ai~ , r ,-,r -z ,,,5°'~'w~ "'u :?i' t 'a'.x b ✓ 'u'- 4. T'6"'"7%3' 7 i, i.' ,i$xu, y'~ -v'-~ ~r r~ ,.si^: . { (Y I~'?E w-~" . ~ . 3`~i. ^uY ` '~•..~y a'~' `i~, L°• c f..i > i,..,r ~;f -r ~ •"aas~.a •C ..,~4`~a .1 ~t r~x ` 'az" ~~ss x r ea , •`z'~~r° v`~* ~..rr a ~~Fp.. - , i a-,vTa x i.,.,~.'^,* a! ~ , [ 7K„tdi:t .aY ,..,k'„; ' . tC a~' :'~a .,u. °'Yar' H. k ,.•,a{-• .rt a •^,a ,.u iv'+.: ; r,«°. _ s" - • rye. , s }:S :~t~,k q .:Sad` • w' r ,Y ~~~'~x. ~ ~ + `~`ir.•. a E . > e,. w+x. ..-J' r~r '1 ~+a~z : .Y+ IIX~~` :2?.. + .'a• ~v : sr ~.{r<, 'M~ , d . `.r ~ ita>P,3'Aa._r ~a4}•+.;: ' , .,o-~. °k Fdt,+ . 7.~z x4 ;+rk: ~ . ~ a:- ,*~r.F"n` a z.:tr•~t n, 'fr '4. u ,r 4#tx ~r: '"0#~:b §a„ r°E K,`' .f ir,i Cdr, , ~axp' m ''?'y';'' .,.x n.#Y,'s .tYM` ,-:s" e '`x': P*•:~S,Y ,q ~ a'~`z*•'' ; ?Ytw ~ ut, r5., ,..~.lz... :7. .i^a, .,++~r•r,. i, i n4.: H ~ Y ' k k' 'aka • a•. -'.'s,a .~''~,~;,5 :t,f^'„u ,s,. . . ,y~ ~~-n. a t ,:1z< 'e".,s,, . ;s ..5 '.yg'.,,,~., ' '.,s tits ..9 n , 1 •~#S' - n k# : i_ +a A~ ~ s a :h Vii, v'aa +a., ,fir , ~'.:^'S, t N,~ s.,.,, „ ;#;;;_r`.r •r:.~,5: a „ ~.i, , u„- • `t~.~ Y.,'= H L. n - - a . t ~ 11d: sr `,a`w 3,:: a. ~ a ;,w•. ara r,a , . t._ I.Sr f~ ~Z~•': RS'.a .7+ `r`+' '~y; Pq 4~ , ~ ~`A MrM,t p-,i'. C, ,:.5~"`.V r~4t 4 it•4. a. m, Sw'1`, z,. E^r'~,«l it e`A,m,... 8, Ey, ~ ,r. r'~,'.'q ~:Y.A : ~'t~~' 1k . ' ut;$ 5~, ~i, t 44 •1Ar`'•, . t~'(T,,,,•t3 ,xr~:f°. r G«, L. k ;a - p j a~.5u:. : 3: ^ 'w a .r,S., k . . a:dr W N. r ?°F.Y. ~*W. ir~ .rP}- y,, . V' r'~ . ~+''H',' , i - uY • ` u . n 4 sr'^d >"z~ m" 1` , 'rule •'g,,, , ~:r.,:,'~•, . ~ T~ ^Ji , , .'r r';M ~:.ta ,SY'." #'a , z'~£r Y>`[a , -.z,C:'~".r Pt- " +~J'<A'' 1r,,✓✓ppS:ag d ..E9 i'"~ q rw.. k:-+r. °1.~~i k''.`~., {v~ ~ '~f:-r l.'. »'i`-"n`,{~ri'" n b i. p~f `t a" •r•4'✓i P,ry, ,'SF x • ;'nk a. Y;. -d'c ~=r y~,h w,r.'U 3w,^;j f r.y. ~,p ~ :YS 4M1 d. 1:.'A. N- d ;'~i : ,ft ~ .4i.-5 s s+ l P,,r,u,, { tnC-,~ Y^, fi!'r' ,3, a1k;"~" . r;.P~,. ~ .y. x'". t a . 5... u• is ,.t ',•7 f ~ # -5 -R , S 31 ",G~ it#a' a 'Ri , s "•"r.}, a a:'., ~ 1 ,,,#"x` .,Sx Y W a~ar'~ v7~ 4< ,k' 2a~'4"t"yn^'i.~ x,. :t ,7-x.'•,` -iut" A. ,:i+•e' "ia+' . as '~K , ' rt~yzs':''~;: to 7" - . a3 •4y a Y IPfT" a x. ,.,s«+, n ;<.F,~,;., ,;?rz.;S'Y^,. r "emu' ^^pp 3ta... ' ~ w, ~ Ewa. n,,fi:. . g 'b' a. »'N 1 "rk, ' ( i•„ rv 'Pat,a'+1f'1 pp :y5, ;,'Y'"~Yt j. ~M. c. 4 ~Uf Kr„4 tx. t w,~ r 5 t~` ,,;M'g'.yi^ J are ,,-;,,~,5;:: w': ,;}t~,;::;_, . ' ,r,+ : e. s `w ~..w, ,>.,yN ra`i , xT'Y"' ,r ..w :'?'i` l .f>. a. w^, ,7`,„," ..+xa• - ' ic'ac;" .,an.na:°- - ~ a an~x 3' _•i;., ~ a.,.:-„ •+~^ar. ,.r .:r e t - - ~u~" .{ei •"'-„'o.•e:'x7. ,.Y .E r' n>~ ntir.:.+t7:a"4e' 4.'r .,m'4x;^., f. ~^~{':'a,,,r z•'.,. a .~s_. G. .s.¢h; J>~ttA[; t.,v,,,=~~.J1. .c. .,T, C ,4' tCa" M'•,4 z~,_., ,.M,. ',ti .'}lk . -~,.w,..ln s` r .f, , r Sx~1 '"r (,J e•aa). 'r.+_ `,t' _ „~6~ aL»~£ 3 ,_;1 ~ yWt&.r .-e - -.r~ .,r k +d' ' r .3~F: u' J .~.:;=.'k:,7..:~•~ :~,>=s"nti+'`a:;~'r'''a,,.:: ~&'.r;:....,t.r `~r.:.:.~,:a! ~xli~ ' <%_L ~ _ it €rw ,1 t r , 4 ' wdwa } pl-W I dk~ s,x ~r 9 3SVHd e A en, of Dodo a+e0 op+e mew iUAV ' 9 3SVHd a y+•yl {BaPy ms IqupW V 3S`dHd f ,I w `t E r x r ` Lars - wL -W tr•" "r wre 7 ewuw..oo is - $ t' £ 3SVHd 1 ~yki,;"4 ti a 4~. r" 1 i' t.wdf4yr awW t t '-9f{ ~kr~ r &-.r r Lenms ~Al sE l 8Z 3SVHd ' t, EP p if H G 't `dZ3Sb'Hd ti g ',y4 a It tf Id &P-1-A -0-W $ p ➢ ~ 4 3SdHd ~ k ~ 8811 L821 LBM1L L8181 L818 /.BIB L87L L8N L819 L8M1 LdC L8R L871 8821 88141 86181 8816 88R 881L 98H 'M, 55,y~, s 4 auyoLLJO.t110 - SNINOISIA s ."~+.-.•~`~-F^r'~•rz;;,^^•,. r,. d r+~..",^^^'°,^' ,^'^~*'t`mr;-t,~•,,i,1 w s, Eix 7 7, k ! d, k e is a'F,~•kr;`: ,MLt S,, a'+G' :t.. ±r'.1'.y .iY:',,:•,,:, RaN K' .,ryr C' X t`f;^ CIS Y "Y- ~i Sl, a L Y 55"4 a' •,'J+" '1' :4i ~t~' e~., ~ . 'su'+,."•"' •c"ms's. -r.:7" . yF's . :dam i;Wa, F • 5"~f+:~i% kn ".~A•ik{.' ''v. ,n 'i 'j,-"YU': 1..F RN, - i~ '"1'vJ; ~ a4 Yc , `+Y'S' ~i:ii•t~ t3 , .C"::'n, ^x's~5,+ct}. .,g mm~~ ,.a: .~k. .`!'::'Y'P. a Y' #S'S:a.~, •'-3:•. i,e :7. _ x,tr.•:-.d o-'xz ; '1 a`"4 u~ ~ {d .',i.a. ~,4 C„. ,h lw 'u:Y''' .rt,(' M1 , 2. 1+,:>n., ^u4+"+^°': t'.e '.i'Yr'" 2 , ,3 . '•x,rk„K` • :r<~Y t-~vyz .de.,~Yt'; - y'-w1,'p,.~ by A, . r a~-,,wr f~ t. al. .T , ~a • • : Y^,,. wr ~t _ ^ .)u ;i r a, I„ ` y'". ~ . 4'- kaS .:3,-. -~7a. s E Y k.- ,C, R v' fn. 't' 4,o-• '.'S^ Ch z i r"~' ? k. ?xlP~" 'i(,-rJ t ' ~ 9 .aaY• [ } r d ~y "1a` t.: '.z'' 1, .`N`, . ~ F`'`'•` , 2W t. e~ ,k") 'h. < `4 - 1: W i:S""zi+ t?fi„'[,.c._ 1 p t ,51i, r,{ Y, H,vt ,y, 1>d'- t5 . 1P Pt .t:'"•i.A". h .t. 9"- tAVr ~ .t' ;i:> t 'l . .h` =a3. Y:rra :•t't~-,. .'r'{: PC.: ti.}'~',"`al 'FY •,C'"4. „L.. .,F., _C~:' ^Y''~i S ~'.S, . <N :I. r M. 5 5"'a., , 4 :.so-, rY,~,. 8.' - 'ti 'tt^:ti.ae...~ C .'n'3" , ~a~ " ~e r r.. s.- a, .-`,r`.,>r a<. ,i,rr .afi"+ .y'S-° ,.x`57 i'' ~ r d- -,:kt .,x•.a _n,,.r L.: z.. `:^°-'Mr.. :;a, =n 4 emu"u,r.t r:uK .,>Qa, .„:tz .,,E >n~"I. Jar: r~ '°.'s'Y-: -aft':" ~'n»,"~, d3 t,•s#v^" ,#ru. x•e y-"~~"1. {a , ,wwr `•rst.,. oa. ,,A,°..Ju::I .A"''q et' 3 . ' -55"~xk'^+~ : ^,a,E ,,'fin k_.3, . .'ss Y++. „~'c.,. l;~'rt+ f ~ ; hi7'r,•'~, rda : '4 ea,x, !>.u~ww. ~j{• al,l..A!~ 3 ' S', _ .t , : a, u~ .aE° ~ a' r d :"0.7• a".. ~ # 'l,= x•ma Mn? Y ^Ra n+ 3.. c• 4R-},". q, :'#'Y Y. ._J .o5'fsT.* ..K rh .s~'tt r, fit. n.++ i, 'S" a .e? b 'r"sw: '°'"i• "~..t br t r~3- >K .`va . _ .~a' s i=;f ` 3z . >FF " ..,,•z't ~^r'*r- -•a a r : 1=4. ,d ,y>`, x,'• , ~a•.+ :a,';. ; i~Y` E . `'.e,., .I. »»ti• 'a ? " r r@" a . sl . • ^"'L,, mF,. s. . a ,Cb s. Sk :xE n 5: ,-S i•Pr a..r. e`o` •m•~," Ec f,4 ;a#vv = , 7 ,ih ,t ,td',.rr»1 ;a f ist5. c . .'>T re„ ,,..t, " r„r e•, . m'r1i ' •F 4`A + dw,".1''••, IM `f'C S .4 an,a ar. ar ~ L :si. E k r } 5~s r. ~d}y. F/c „r~.r,^1, a, .-v',~•<<~:. H i-'' .i:.vtxt; s,.,. +:•~f.'~k -~i' 7 ;n.,,~ =•"gr ~ k J: w, k. F' 7 .ka 6~• ,n. I :""F7. .t~'i'tsf :"~2 ;t; ~•ri+r->< pL,•'J,P. 7 g , Y,r ,y~ i• L m.~'y` CE('.L. i • t x •r, „d'. !ry ,r5: , t ~ a;.•~ ^t, . '"$b' . 04 ~4 +.•4'' nt.. ^y.« x[7,y: r-. .i< ,.v._ t3 rY e. ,TI "rit, ~•h k:r °P, .A t.:.e YJS;E ..a-, y~ t-rF.. Y"~ ^.ktl: t twY "",,t w", .,.Y6, 2`•',V>„- ,_Y a: p 9 ,a e ,.E•x . ( r,'.i, °h~ , , ri -~7a,. a F. 1, , +a-r,+,- ,~y }~-u5 ,'r ~ fv'.3 '+T'.rp : ^:r."`. v:r.,r, l,, =i~.~iv, r; ' i4"''.,^.~'x"ru. + ^.:F :t' "`'':I:- ,5X' +rxr ~+"S 't,'R x Ac,>c', w .:jb. v r ?-°''EF5 i •F,~r " - i ,1: . 2.:G Y "'.tT 4, ',Y5'e "i;4~',a,<:,'., h_, 1'ri.•,,4 ,*F . i<`":E•`+'+" -a+.. :w,,.u - ,;;xes,G. t.<.. »`.u a~:.,, . Ord;.,,'-. er.w,,aaa.r:a+.. '`a ,n. s --,:,„,a w.,."%«,'%Iw-•.. wG~" .SxG':,. k;, P`..:r.,::n~w>< '.a. .,r ..mow .w.r `..a .v ,.r sxc„r. ,,N.. i• - grc2~e - T~1P}- t Y _ S -k 4~";~•.•,'---~•¢ - e § rirv x 2 5 3 t i t~'a~,f tii.y., - i -t t _ t - ~t - u- .ry`A u`" r , , AV IL z - _ «I ' -V`'~'1 MrFd2 -,,;rl.s '7 °3" _ a- + '"''sa -.a - m.. , - a, ~ z v -cam r'- ' ~ "~",x`'~,a-' g b ix5+ _ S y s s y .n Z'ZZ"W, r s "~'.z~nts'' x ? ~ =n. Z' a wtr 3 h r e e t e x' r~ Y 'yax Y t Ft C w- b s L a aj ` F a y- Ire; cf^,*34 - 11 - - . I ~Vl s» i zee, ? '3r s x - - ~ ~ - z VISIONING PROCESS DETAILS { ry as of 5/1/96 x t Est F 5.x.~. -aa"5cs x t'S "I .1 s , E ' PHASE 1 - INTRODUCE. ('(17ycnm v rni~%N >1 t s f t a W tzw-~ .~t~~ I Yd- 'vim- ~b' 3 • June 1 - October 15, 1996 m '4 - V : r s - ;i'-b ` des ~'-'S`a` a- 1~ - - ~ i ,r purpose of phase: Y a 7xss tom, ` r tS' C Ti.+ S k Meet with schools, CIT's, Chamber, & civic groups - share reason for process/timeline - ` -x , ;yam ` ' • e Design concept piece (logo) - s ;k t - , • Prepare survey & obtain approval for form questions ~ F << tee -11 fi - o BILLresources: Review materials & 2 public mtg./week z R r5 QW, LIZ Develop materials & 2 public mtg./week 11 ~ - s r • LOREEN Develop materials & 2 public mtg./week Z t~ ' e f f • EXEC. STAFF. Attend biweekly briefings on process/status ' ~ Z~ r A -r,,~-' • CITY STAFF Design process logo ` r,~ • COUNCIL * Support process/commit to using outcomes of _ q~ _ I - - visioning process in decision-making when available ~ 6 _ _ 11 ~ Authorize adequate funding for successful process t-k r ~4x , F ~ ~n n a 11 _ • COSTS Supplies/mailings/etc. (see budget page) E~`, s x h s s ,4 • ADMIN. ASST. Hire process to be completed by 9/15/96 (see budget page) 1 % , = L w (this assumes no intems are available) ~ z~a } ~x~ sY • INTERN Second year intern 9/1/96 thru 5/31/97 & 6/1/97 thm 1/31/98 _ (see budget page for details of cost) th, ` P y 1 er,,^` < Outside resources: } ' PROCESS CONSULTANT Hire consultant for process ($1,000) ° r k , s E 1 ~ 4 ' e SURVEY CONSULTANT Hire consultant for survey design/analysis ($500) ~ ~ , fs' • ~f', - s.2k„d~t"x s "fit 1 :i am 5k •,y€}- - t Media's role/use: ,a ' a ¢ r ` e CITYSCAPE Laz a article on - t 1 g purpose of visioning process (business page too) - - ~y V ,3W 1 #3 7 - e OREGONIAN Article about visioning process/purpose , f , t e TIGARD TIMES Article about visioning process/purpose - ~E e' • TV/RADIO/CABLE Program on work with students/groups r ; T~' < j • OTHER Chamber newsletter e " i~t"e+i 'r ax=e; 4ras Y s Closure to Phase: . - r r- o Kick off celebration for next phase (Sponsored by local business) ,=v I r, x t ~1 x - Harvest theme @ THS football field s - - Im1ms/vsncc514.doc - 3 t ` ` Y. # °~3 I i xl afi¢ T 9 h ff X x "_M c m"aFira "y'.' h°''"" - xxr„ve. s=exiar. - - rw 3Y >JVr «'t rrr~~- ' P - f 3 - } ~d Jt"'r ~n s{ : x u y - A- ^7, e`^H ~ ~ 4 T ~E Y A7,. v j J _ l.i" q t - , s k fit - -t- ;z i ,r _ ~~r y R , 7 t r z - ' s' 'tom { 1 - ~ , ` . ~ N ~ - 1 , - .:i ,i v.~.1 .y Y :N. , _ _.~-h Tyys. ...•i 4 ..,v~.~ c,., i. ..iT~~ .v~~__. .~c.l I' _1r- N+.'h- N' 4 N 31t '2 _ 5 2 .C k-it"r$~ c'~ # ry'd'^H~ f: VA~ ur G v t7 r -t~ r r t t e' t - -.fX,p;Y.✓'-a,... ..rL"',,'3r~: Yr - r r r 3 c s ,a # Kil -~rrt*rs. 'a'a TF ' - f'rk"rr.4 srfia"" -;I WR lob 4qx<.: k'Sw'4M.'ae•-."y:=- VWI-4 -1Z y 3 p>< ~--z s r •z `s .T „i t-u~-~?,,ti„ #ta t '+.^+x-+},=. µ5 a^s s_ - M M 'N NOS 01 GROUPS TO MEET WITH: 0JOR 071 - rt. ,z.. Budget Committee c .s.> sy ,:.a+g"~~?!?yC~+_,yr~F`3''- 15 'r'af CIT -East ~A " 1 CIT - South xt , tt - CIT - West/Central C=x ` Community Policing Group' Library Board y~ r Friends of the Library TAHPA 99W Task Force `K Planning Commission Tigard School District 23J Beaverton School District 4 P _ Lions Senior Center Board F; f y s Chamber of Commerce ar t k, ~ Rotary (noon meeting) V $x x Rotary (morning meeting) _ :2 Tetra-Kiwanis ® Tualatin Valley Mental Health Board ¢ ffij~ 3 _ Ministerial Association ti's Downtown Merchantsr PacTrust businesses Washington Square businesses - . ' Summerfield Civic Association Crime Watch groups "A"-1 ^ r Neighborhood Associations ; ~ ' v, K r Bull Mountain CPO = - G ' Metzger CPO § Country Daze Committee Y F s Little League r ~ Soccer Association Recreation Program users - Tigard residentsf c f Cook Park users - Tigard residents tt k Tualatin Valley Water District 6 _ Youth Football s , hn eta' c. etc. etc. x' d - 43, -ow Elm ors A~ r~ - -x f,1 sr"rcr.y..~- i - ~t t matey, ex 7M v- - r s r '.-"P.~.,..; ,:"Y2..xA~«v'°`wa+s+rea - - c x"g' v°..„"°'"".-' -.•~.,„....r.,,a. T- ia t ~~Y r -'#e t -A tK.-- r3- 3 ,r7 MA y: ~S - 'rte ru m ',.r.~..u!nit >c-^ 4~.er, z ax 1 t s , P~'7'#,~'€ a yI~f,lr e 7 _r sit ' 'yr, .dL s - - r Y.' S+rL'~6M rYt? 1 I x a>~,.`"~;•'''~ir"`v z s ~~4 C - -,~o t_ - ! s, - _ 'i - - _ T ~nr~-r3, ~ r ~a - ,~x •~`,f~,.'k'` t s 9 r,'- ~ r 7< 7g~,r y~x r°7 r F P F 3 k ~ ~ ~~,~i ~ t 3 a - F ~ t , s xp >Y c~ ~ >F