Loading...
City Council Packet - 06/13/1995 Revised ITT OF TI®ADD PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons Interested in testifying be present by 7.15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business adds items can be heard in any order after 7-30 p m Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (7°DD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaq. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, ii is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please ;notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: &'19-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Dean. & ARE ATrr®C•n AGE'VDA COUNCIL. AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 1 IzIng I!;! TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE. 13, i995 AGENDA e 6:30 PM w•raawa• ~irr7soQA e vm 1f M ff-- v iG,vVO . > Business Meeting Agenda Review 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3. Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) Amhk 7:45 PM 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: May 23, 1995 3.2 Receive and !File: a. Council Calendar b. Council Tentative Agenda 3.3 Accept the Proposed Agreement for Right of Way to be Abandoned by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Required for 72nd Avenue - Resolution No. 95-_ 3.4 Authorize the City Administrator to Sign on Behalf of the City a Dedication Deed Transferring Title of Property Purchased for the Extension of S.W. 109th Avenue - Resolution No. 95-Consent Agenda Continued on Next Page.... a COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 2 1 P M 01 C0- SENT AGE:mI A (CONTINUED) 3.5 Local Contract Review Board: a. Authorize a Contract with Tualatin Valley Water District to Purchase Ai ernh is Water b. Award Contract for Construction of S.W. Baylor Street Water System Interne to J. L. Arndt Construction Company C. Award Contract for Water Rate Study to CH2M Hill d. Award Contract for Construction of the Bonita Road Widening Project to Berning Construction e. Award Contract for Construction of the Bull Mountain Road Shoulder Improvements to Casper & Magera, Incorporated f. Reject all Bids for Construction of the Shady Lane Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Project and Authorize Staff to Again Advertise for Bids Later in the Year g. Authorize Purchase of LED Retrofit Kts for the City's Eleven Traffic Signals h. Award Bid for the Main Street Reconstruction Project L Award Bid for the Grant Avenue Sidewalk Project • Cos t dada - Kerins flemm ed W Ser SM& D®sceisVM: Any darns requ l to be removed from the C tAgenda for separate discussion will be considered immediaisfy after the Council has votsd on those items which do not need discussion. 7:55 PM 4. PUBLIC HEARING - 1995-96 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges C. Summation by Budget Officer d. Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination e. Recommendation by Budget Officer f. Council Questions or Comments g. Public Hearing Closed h. Consideration by Council: • RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR STATE SHARED REVENUES • ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 3 am= WO NO WIN 7~t G - 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET r . .HE_e RAN Trnoc ora aetimata. 8:05 PM a. Public Hearing Opened b. Summation by Finance Director 8:15 PM C. Public Testimony: (Please limit testimony to five minutes per person.) • Proponents • Opponents 8:30 PM d. Recommendation by Finance Director 8:35 PM e. Council Questions or Comments f. Public Hearing Closet 8:45 PM g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 95-_ 8:45 PM 6. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PRIORITY LIST Times are estimates... 8:45 PM a. Staff Report: City Engineer 8:55 PM b. Open Public Comment (Please limit comment to five minutes per person) • In Favor of List as Presented • Opposed to List as Presented 9:30 PM C. Close Public Comment d. Council Discussion 9:40 PM e. Council Consideration: Determine, by Council motion, the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 1995-96 9:45 PM 7. ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON DURHAM ROAD BETWEEN SW 72ND AVENUE AND UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD a. Staff Report: City Engineer b. Council Questions C. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 95- 9:55 PM 8. ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON BONITA ROAD EAST OF 83RD COURT (MOTE: SEPARATE CODE SECTION ALREADY ADDRESSES PORTION WEST OF 83RD COURT) a. Staff Report: City Engineer b. Council Questions C. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 95.%__ COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE -13,1995 - PAGE 4 71 10:05 PM 9. ORDINANCE CONSIDER ; T C O : PAMING RESTRICTIONS OIL SW NORTH E AKnTA ST UST arc-muccu S-CHO L IS -FEIRRY ROAD a~® SPRINGWOOD DRfi E a. Staff Report: City Engineer b. Council Questions C. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 95 10:15 PM 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 10:25 PM 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the pro4^sions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), &'(h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. All discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. 10:45 PM 12. ADJOURNMENT 0=0613.95 COUNCIL. AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1995 PAGE 5 Council Agenda Item , TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 • Meeting was called to order at 6:37 p.m: by Mayor Jim Nicoll. 1. ROLL CALL Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoll; Councilors Wandi Conover Hawley, Paul Hunt, Bob Rohif (arrived at 6:46 p.m.), and Ken Scheckla. Staff: Present: Bill Monahan, City Administrator; Wayne Lowry, Finance Director; Liz Newton, Community Involvement Coordinator; Jim Coleman, Legal Counsel; Ed Wegner, Maintenance Services Director; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; Randy Wooley, City Engineer; and Sandy Zodrow, Human Resources Director. STUDY SESSION • Mayor Nieoli announced he need to leave tha Council meeting at 7:25 p.m., but would be returning as quickly as possible. He requested Agenda Item No. 6 be delayed untii he returned so that he could participate in the discussion. • It is anticipated that Music in the Park representatives will be on the Visitor's Agenda. Mr. Monahan noted that two additional letters had been received with regard to Music in the Park. It has been requested that consideration be given to construct a temporary stage. This stage would be used for Music in the Park, as well as other functions. The group is planning on a September 10 celebration in Cook Park for Tiigard's 34th birthday. The temporary stage could also be used to continue the pilot program effort for a Music in the Park permanent facility. Maintenance Services Director Wegner advised it would cost about $4,200 for materials to build a temporary facility. It is expected that no labor costs would be incurred, because carpenters in the area have offered to put the stage together. The Tualatin Valley Community Band advised they would like to hold their practices on the stage on Tuesday evenings. It is hoped that uses such as this throughout the summer would generate more community interest. Mayor Nicoli advised tie has talked to Mr. Matthew Ryan of the Broadway Rose, and ACCTS organization. There is a possibility that through connections of Mr. Ryan's, organization, if they become involved in this project, they would be able to find some funding and grants for a good quality band shell. Mayor Nicoli GfrY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1595 - PAGE ? 71 ~°v`w--..~ ® tft 111ccW Oln d at the budget review AM, cautioned u "~ta~ u-` span ding u ov w~va.ou,v~ . If. a...rr!'rp• - - -rove later in the meeting, no funds be expended until this opportunity is invesiigatted. Metzger Park Local Improvement District hearing - City Administrator Monahan reviewed the process that the County would be following to determine whether an increase in the Metzger LID assessment could be implemented. (See memorandum from Cathy Wheatley dated June 9, 1995.) Due to some changes in timing by the County, it is anticipated that the hearing before the Tigard City Council to solicit input from Tigard residents would be held on July 11, 1995. After discussion, Council direction was to have staff notify all City of Tigard property owners within the Metzger Park LID area of the public hearing. Executive Session: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 7:04 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) tV discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. Executive Session adjourned at 7:15 p.m. • Retention ponds - Mayor Nicoll suggested the City Councilors view the three retention ponds located in the vicinity of 135th and Walnut. Mayor Nicoli advised he had visaed with people In the area. Some consider the ponds unsightly, unsafe and "mosquito traps," while others did not offer an opinion. He advised he felt the residents had some valid issues and agreed the matter be scheduled as an agenda item in the future. City Engineer Wooley advised he would also send to City Council in their newsletter addresses of two or three other retention pond saes so Council could look at other retention pond designs (aka water treatment facilities). • Overview of budget agenda item - City Administrator Monahan noted Council has two options to review. Additions to the budget include the a $70,000 line item for purchase of Burlington Northern property (located at the Tigard Feed and Seed Store on Main Street), and $5,000 for Music in the Park. In addition, both options also include funding for a compensation and classification study. In response to a question from Councilor Hunt with regard to dollars allocated for a long-range water study, should funding be needed, Mr. Monahan and Mr. Wegner advised there will be money available in legal, engineering, and - contingency funds. Cl T Y COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 2 10 1,11 the 13Uft1nplUr i tv:r 0_vrr~iu_-t1 ~ e u~-.-e~.. there wm there ._-11111 be Mr. Monahan noted with regard t0 i N..i..ri~x _ a e l®oting next week for interested parties. There will be an update to the City Council in Executive Session at next week's meeting. Finance Director Lowry reviewed Options 1 and 2 and also advised if the $5,000 is allocated for Music in the Park, it does not mean the City has committed to spend those funds. Council meeting recessed at 7:35 p.m. Mayor Nicoli left the meeting at 7:35 p.m. Council meeting reconvened at 7:40 p.m. BUSINESS (MEETING Business Meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Council President Hunt. The following requests for Non-Agenda items were noted: • City Administrator (Monahan - Alternate MPAC member • City Administrator Monahan - Board and Committee appointment process • Councilor Hunt requested a report on communications with ODOT with regard to the Triangle. 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA: • Jack Polaris, 16000 SW Queen Victoria Place, King City, Oregon, 97224, testified with concerns regarding the number of Intergovernmental Agreements that Tigard was entering into with regard to water supply. In addition, he requested updates on the negotiations between Lake Oswego and the City of Tigard, and questioned why it was taking so long. Council President Hunt explained discussions had been taking place during Executive Session; negotiations were continuing. City Administrator Monahan elaborated that Lake Oswego is considering the a submittal the City of Tigard made on a proposed package. In addition, Tigard is talking with the Tualatin Valley Water District to enter into an interim water agreement. Regardless of who supplies long-term water to Tigard, the Tigard water system will need an interim agreement. In addition, the City of Tigard is keeping Icing City, Durham, and the Tigard Water CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 3 District apprised of the situation. To date, these entities have concurred AMIk 71 VIfI[h everything `VVIin Tigard's actions on r 40-181'r ►f"io"o.', • Mary Payne, 16277 SW 135th Terrace, Tigard, Oregon, testified with regard to supporting Music in the Park. She referred to current subsidized events from the City of Tigard, including the Festival of Balloons, 4th of July, and Tigard Country Daze. She referred to the large number of retirees within the area who would benefit from the Music in the Park activity. She supported the building of a stage in Cook Park to accommodate music and cultural events. Mrs. Payne also read a letter from Matthew Ryan (on file with the Council packet material). The Arts Commission of Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood has taken the Music in the Park committee under their 501(c)(3) umbrella for the purpose of tax benefits. In addition, ACCTS can also write grants to obtain funds to pay bands to perform next summer in Cook Park. Mr. Ryan requested a feasibility report be done and all possibilities looked at before a permanent stage is constructed. • Martha Bishop, 10590 SW Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, distributed to Council samples of flyers for publicity for Music in the Park to illustrate some of the efforts being made to get the September 10 event underway. Mrs. Bishop read her testimony, which included a request that Council commit to support the Music in the Park effort. Council President Hunt advised Mrs. Bishop that Music in the Park funding would be considered during the budget hearing process. 3. CONSENT AGENDA 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: May 23, 1995 3.2 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar b. Council Tentative Agenda 3.3 Accept the Proposed Agreement for Right of Way to be Abandoned by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Required for 72nd Avenue - Resolution No. 95-25 3.4 Authorize the City Administrator to Sign on Behalf of the City a Dedication Deed Transferring Title of Property Purchased for the Extension of S.W. 109th Avenue - Resolution No. 95-26 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13,19-05 - PAGE 4 3Y5 !nr•,AI Contract Review Board: a. Authorize a Contract with I lJaleui t vanay 6a~ai 0A5ii i-vt L%► 6urv: ;c°a°r Surplus Water b. :ward Contract for Construction of S.W. Baylor Street Water System Interne to J. L. Arndt Construction Company C. Award Contract for Water Rate Study to CI-12M Hill d. Award Contract for Construction of the Bonita Road Widening Project to Berning Construction e. Award Contract for Gonstruction of the Bull Mountain Road Shoulder Improvements to Casper & Magera, Incorporated f. Reject all Bids for Construction of the Shady Lane Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Project and Authorize Staff to Again Advertise for Bids Later in the Year g. Authorize Purchase of LED Retrofit Ma for the City's Eleven Traffic Signals h. Award Bid for the Main Street Reconstruction Project i. Award Bid for the Grant Avenue Sidewalk Project Councilor Scheckla requested Item 3.3 be discussed separately. This item is entitled "Accept the Proposed Agreement for Right of Way to be Abandoned by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Required for 72nd Avenue." City Engineer Wooley clarified questions from Councilor Scheckla. Councilor Scheckla advised he was concerned that enough right-of-way be retained for future expansion. City Engineer Wooley advised that enough room was being saved so that another lane could be added. Councilor Scheckla indicated his questions had been answered, and Item 3.3 remained on the Consent Agenda. Items 3.2(a) and (b) were removed from Councilor Hunt for further discussion. Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Rohif, to approve the Consent Agenda, with Items 3.2(a) and (b) removed for separate discussion. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohif, and Scheckla voted "yes.") (Note: Council discussion on Items 3.2(a) and (b) took place during Non-Agenda Items - Item No. 10) CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1955 - PAGE 5 _ A-ft ^HR!_!C HEMAR.ING - 1995-9-9 USES :)F-57 REVENUE SH RINn- a. Public Hearing was opened. b. Declarations or Challenges - there were none. C. Summation by Budget Officer: Finance Direcivr Lowry reviewed the staff report. In order to receive State revenue sharing funds, the City must hold a public hearing before the Budget Committee and before the City Council on the use of such funds. Revenue sharing funds are a resource to the general fund and are used to fund Police operations. The proposed ordinance certifies that the required hearings were held and that the City is electing to receive such revenues. In order to receive the other State revenues, the City must certify that it provides four or more required services from a list of municipal services. The City provides six such services. A proposed resolution before the City Council certifies that the required services are provided. d. Public Testimony - None e. Recommendation by Budget Officer Staff recommended that the Declaration of Certification be made by approval of the proposed ordinance and resolution. f. Council Questions or Comments - None g. Public Hearing was closed. h. Consideration by Council RESOLUTION NO. 95-27 - A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDE SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR STATE SHARED REVENUES Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to adopt Resolution No. 95-27. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.") CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 6 ORDINANCE NO. 95-12 - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S I M 7-k _ GLGVI~VIY IV eii=V~ivs-vii-ii a-i:~V~:s`vw Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-12. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.") 5. f!UBLIC HEARING - 1995-96 FI$CAL YEAR BUDGET a. Public Hearing was opened b. Summation by Finance Director Finance Director Lowry summarized the staff report. Two options were presented to City Council. Local budget law requires that a budget for the ensuing fiscal year be adopted prior to July 1 by the governing body, after approval by the Budget Committee and after a public hearing has been held before the City Council. Mr. Lowry explained the differences between Options 1 and 2. Option 1 represented one change to the approved budget as proposed by the Budget Committee. The City Council, at the May 23, 1995 meeting authorized the Human Resources Director to move ahead with a classification and compensation review. The review is estimated to cost $30,000, which was not anticipated in the approved budget, and therefor-17 requires that the budget be adjusted by Council to reflect this change. The change is within Council's authority. Option No. 2 also included the classification and compensation review. In addition, Council expressed its desire to provide funding for a Music in the Park pilot program for the summer. Another change to the budget included a possible funding for the purchase of the Feed and Seed Store on Main Street. All these changes are within the Council's authority. In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Mr. Lowry explained that allocation does not mean funds are automatically authorized for expenditure. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 7 r Ps jin it TAC#imnnv Proponents: • Gene McAdams, 13420 SW Brittany Drive, Tigard, Oregon, expressed some uncertainty about protocol as to process, noting that he desired to comment on the Capital Improvement Projects, but did not know whether • certain approvals would be made by if the budget is adopted. It was noted the budget does include funding for capital improvements. Later on the agenda there will be an opportunity for the public to comment on the priorities of the Capital improvement Projects. Mr. McAdams indicated he was an advocate of the 130th/Winterlake issue, and advised he felt it was important that the City uphold promises and commitments. He referred to the comprehensive planning process, and advised there was no alternative but to approve the 130th/Winterlake project. He referred to the fact that this was a collector street, the park was for City-wide usage, and the Planning Commission approved the Comprehensive Plan priority listing by a 6-1 vote. In addition, he advised that the staff continued to recommend that the 130th/Winterlake connection be constructed. He referred to the advantages of enhanced emergency response time. He also referred to a December Tigard Times editorial urging the connection. He noted traffic concerns for residents on Brittany Drive and neighboring streets, and referred to the Local Improvement District approved on 135th Street; the resultant additions! affic loads, and directional signs to the park. There was brief discussion among Council concerning whether Mr. McAdams should be making his comments now, or on Item No. 6, when the Capital Improvement Project priority list is reviewed. Mr. McAdams noted he may need to testfil again :°Ath regard to the same points. Opponents: • Sally Christensen, 15585 SW 76th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, noted she was concerned that the total cost of the construction of the 7gth/Durham intersection traffic signal was not allocated into the Capital Improvement Project listing. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 8 7a rtity Fnninnar Woo!ev nn+nri *him fire tra wain Qi9e r9niissr srnr, a.,r - -Via.'-~ --v -•`o^'--- ..ate.... was left when other projects had been funded. In addition, other sources of funding might be found, including contributions from the School District, and possibly some funding help from Durham which could use their Traffic Impact Fees to help offset some of these costs. The Oregon Department of Transportation is conducting traffic counts this week to determine whether the intersection would warrant a traffic signal. In addition, it wa ~ noted that permission would be needed from the Oregon Department of Transportation for this traffic signal. After hearing the explanation, Ms. Christensen advised she no longer had concerns or would object to the budget as proposed. • Ron and Emily Bohart, 15491 SW Peachtree Drive, Tigard, Oregon, 97224, presented their request for possible funding for a "Affairs of the Art." This is an art show in which local artists are able to display their talents. Last year was the first year for the show; forty artists exhibited. When the Arts Commission in Tigard, Tualatin, and Sherwood (ACTTS) did not receive their funding, it affected funding for this program as well. There was brief discussion with regard to the type of show this was, the long-range plans for this event, the needs for postage and advertising, and the fact that other contributors are also helping. The event is scheduled for August 19 and 20, 1995 in the Tigard High School Commons. Councilor Hunt noted concerns and a reluctance to go around the Budget Committee. The amount requested was $500. It was noted that the Affairs of the Arts did not receive separate funding from the Budget Committee during the budget process, because their request was incorporated in ACTTS. After discussion, and because of the circumstances surrounding the fact that this item was included in the AC1TS request which was not funded, Council advised they would consider a request after the paperwork, as is required of other events and social agency requests, is completed. This issue will be heard within the next few weeks at a Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PACE 9 71 • JaG1C 1"06ll', I6030 SVV ldUliC9ll Yr ICiWI Iti U! IVt7, NI i~ l~lA.~►, !JI d~Lil I, 97224, presented questions concerning the Tigard Water District meetings and the Intergovernmental Water Board budgets. City Administrator Monahan responded to Mr. Polaris' concerns by advising that the Tigard Water District was established to serve the unincorporated area. The City of Tigard would make the final action and decisions with regard to capital improvements for servicing the Tigard Water service area Mr. Polaris was referred to the Finance Director to clarify questions he had with regard to where in the budget he could find items such as capital improvement expenditures and the day-to-play operations funding. • Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon, 97224, testified that he would like to see the music events funded as proposed. He suggested some of the other parks, such as Fanno Creek Park, might be a good place for such events to "draw folks together." He also advised he would like to see family entertainment and concession stands. • Jerry Love, 12930 SW Glacier Lily, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, gave preliminary remarks with regard to the 130/Winterlake connection. Mr. Love was opposed to the connection. Council President Hunt asked Mr. Love to continue his presentation during the next Council agenda item. City Administrator Monahan affirmed that this would be the time to address how many dollars should be set aside for Capital Improvement Projects. d. Recommendation by Finance Director to adopt the budget, with either Option 1 or 2. After-brief clarification of the difference between Option 1 and 2, Council considered a resolution adopting the budget. e. Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Resolution No. 95-28 (Option 2). RESOLUTION NO. 95-28 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAILING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY, AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.") CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 10 cig U 111 at tha of ! AI- r a~i wnc, was attending to (Council President i-iu riot®®, ~e ~o Qy,a~. another commitment, that Agenda Item No. 6 would be delayed for consideration. Council President Hurst noted that Mayor Nicoll would attempt to return to the City Council meeting so that he could participate in the discussion and consideration of Agenda Item No. 8. 7. ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON D 1RHAP~ an kD BETWEEN SW 72NQ AVENUE AND UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD Staff report was given by City Engineer Wooley. A copy of the staff report is on file with the Council packet materials. Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Rohl, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-13. ORDINANCE NO. 95-13 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TMC 10.28.130 BY ADDING PORTIONS OF SW DURHAM ROAD WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.") 8. ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION: PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON BONITA ROAD EAST OF 83RD COURT (NOTE: SEPARATE CODE SECTION ALREADY ADDRESSES PORTION WEST OF 83RD COURT) Staff report was summarized by City Engineer Wooley. A copy of the staff report is on file with the Council packet material. After brief discussion and assurances to Councilor Scheckla that a time period is given to allow people to adjust to the fact that parking restrictions are in effect would be given. Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-14. ORDINANCE NO. 95-14 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TMC 10.281.130 BY ADDING PORTIONS OF SW BONITA ROAD WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 11 r /~4iA~~K ON R~I ~~AP9Y~~ aft ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION: PARKING hF?TR1011ONS vii S M ~ n - DAKOTA STREET BETWEEN SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD AND SPRING'WOOD DR1_V_E a. Staff report was summarized by City Engineer Wouley. A copy of the staff report is on file with the Council packet material. b. Council Questions There was brief discussion on the fact that a project, under construction on North Dakota Street near Scholls Ferry Road, will include a center turn lane. This lane will be marked for the commercial.portion of North Dakota Street between Scholls Ferry Road and Springwood Drive. Councilor Rohif noted some concerns that such improvements may entice additional traffic to North Dakota Street. The staff report noted the ordinance will affect only the area north of Springwood, where there is no residential frontage. Parking will still be allowed in the residential areas. ORDINANCE NO. 95-15 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TMC 10.281.130 BY ADDING PORTIONS OF SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED C. Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to adopt Ordinance No. 95-15. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.") Council meeting recessed at 9:08 p.m. Council meeting reconvened at 9:29 p.m. Note: Mayor Nicoli was present at the meeting after the Council recess, and presided over the meeting from this point forward. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE -13,1995 - PAGE 12 .r.r.rPia ri-rC:ll %AJAQ i.iee~el~ t~l IT C_n-9: ~_?G~_ie@ 6c VGw~ e~Rl ^ I!.'. ~ THESE MINUTES AT THE END OF AGENDA ITEM NO. 5) PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT -CAPITAL fMPROVEMENT PROJECT PRIORITY LIST a. City Engineer Woolley presented the Staff Report. He referred to the information presented to the Council from the Citizen Involvement Teams (CiTs). He commented on the various funds available for the projects. Council asked questions for clarification with regard to prioritization of the projects. Also, Mr. Woolley clarified the CIT process for this issue. There was discussion of individual projects such as the 79th/Durham traffic signal and the 130th/Winterlake project. Mr. Wooley reported, in response to a question, that the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend the CIP list. The Commissioner who voted against the list, was opposed to the 130th/Winterlake because he disagreed with the plan for street connectivity. b. Public Comment Pro nen : • Gene McAdams, 13420 S.W. Brittany Drive, Tigard, Oregon referred to his earlier testimony during the Budget public hearing. Mr. McAdams advised that the 130th/Winterlake street is a collector street and has been planned as a collector street for a long time. He compared this street connection to Brittany Drive which has been designated as a neighborhood street in the Comprehensive Plan. He noted the Comprehensive Plan has been "verified and reverified" as developments were approved over the years. Mr. McAdams also referred to the Parks Plan where the street connection was also shown. He referenced the Planning Commission vote which was 6-1 in favor of the Capital Improvement Program with this connection listed. Mr. McAdams commented on emergency access (Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue); such access would be enhanced, because of reduced response time, with this connection. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 13 I'll 11 IN Room 7 Mr. McAdams supported the mmnncA o.AnRai imprAVement progrgi 01 r] OEM r r r r priority HER. ffm~ • Gerald Welch, 12405 S.W. Winterlake Drive, Tigard, Oregon, testified in support of the 130th/Winterlake bridge connection referring to the parks bond measure approved by voters. He advised the voters had paid for the connection; he would like to see the connection go in. He said he was tired of coming to meetings and would like to see the issue be resolved. • Dan Gott, 13230 S.W. Hill Court, Tigard, Oregon, testified in favor of the capital improvements program. He supported connectivity (referring specifically to the Main Street area and near City Hal!) of pathways for easier accessibility in the City. • Bob Pavlukovich, 12345 S.W. 128th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon testified with regard to the 130th/Winterlake connection. He supported the connection noting he desired to see the controversy on this issue end. He said the road should have already been built. He said they have waited a long time for the connection to be constructed. He referred to the benefits of emergency vehicle access. Mr. Pavlukovlch referred to a petition signed by 225+ people. This petition was given to the Council and Planning Commission. He noted those people who signed the petition will be impacted by the Council's decision because those people live in the area. Mr. Pavlukovich also commented on safety and interconnectivity within neighborhoods. • Ron Wridge, 12399 S.W. Winterlake Drive, Tigard, Oregon, testified on the following points regarding the 130th/Winterlake connection: 1) Impacts to wetlands appear to be almost non-existent. 2) Safety issues including improved emergency vehicle response time. 3) Cut-through traffic would not be a problem. Mr. Wridge advised that major issues, with regard to the connection have been addressed and resolved. He asked the Council to vote in favor of the Capital Improvement Program. CITY COUNCIL MEET NG MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1945 - PAGE 14 50 am An MW W V. Ca►roiyn DeFrang, i ifti50 I.~v. -sfft c.6 e a ail°, - arci, vregon, 71 tectired with regard to the Terrace Trails pathway. Ms. DeFrang FE advised she was currently on the Planning Commission and had served five years on the Park Board. Ms. DeFrang summarized the history of the development of the pathway. She referred to a map noting the length of the pathway and said that an additional pedestrian access was needed for the pathway; otherwise, people may be cutting through yards to gain access to the pathway. Council members discussed this issue with Ms. DeFrang and City Engineer Wooley. • Sally Christensen, 15685 S.W. 76th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon signed in as an "opponent" on the testimony list. Ms. Christensen's' concerns were with regard to the traffic signal at 79th/Durham. (See testimony during the Budget public hearing.) Ms. Christensen submitted a petition sign by "194" people stating that they support the use of City monies to construct a traffic signal at 79th Avenue and Durham Road. Opponents: • Michael Gerking, 11149 S.W. Eschman Way, Tigard, Oregon advised testified with regard to the 130th/Winteriake connection. Mr. Gerking advised that he was angry and frustrated with the process. He noted concerns with connection and the impacts to the neighborhood comparing it to what has occurred on S.W. North Dakota Street. Mr. Gerking also disputed the impartiailty of the traffic study. He noted concerns with the Planning Commission decision advising that the Planning Commission had wrong information. Mr. Gerking said the entire area has changed and referred to the development of single family homes where the plans were for multi- family. He advised that the bridge would have terrible consequences and would be of no benefit. • Carl Gioia,11201 S.W. Winteriake Drive, Tigard, Oregon, read a iffier into the record. (This letter is on file with the Council packet information.) Mr. Gioia outlined the West CIT recommendation on the project and requested that the City Council remove the S.W. 130th/Winterlake connection down the priority list or remove it altogether. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 15 low, Don Nelson, 13t5"JU S.W. "i-1ou1 Cuiii, 1 -gard, vew We"$ v a'~ 'I[h • regard to bank erosion and channel down cutting of the stream behind his property. Mr. Nelson request that stream stabilization work be included in the Capital Improvement Project list. City Engineer Wooley noted that this items was not in the proposed CIP list, it may be possible (in conjunction with another project) this issue could be resolved utilizing maintenance funds. Mr. Nelson said the erosion appeared to be occurring because of new development along Gaarde and the Arlington Ridge development. • Gary Love, 12930 S.W. Glacier Lily, testified that he concluded, after, reviewing the traffic study, the vdinteriake connection would shift the traffic problems in the area. There will be a high potential of cut- through traffic from S.W. 130th Avenue to S.W. North Dakota. Time saved by emergency vehicles, because of the access, would be minimal. Current response times are within standards required for fire and ambulance. Mr. Love was concerned that the connection would result in damage to the wetlands and the park. He recommended the funds allocated for the connection be used where "it is really needed." Mr. Love referred to the Comprehensive Plan, saying that it was 12 years old the Plan should be used as a guideline. Judgments should be made on how things are to6Ry. Mr. Love disagreed with the statement by Mr. McAdams that the park is for the privileged few. • Michael Karls, 11081 S.W. Eschman Way, Tigard, Oregon referred to the May 4 West CIT meeting, advising that the recommendation that went to the Planning Commission was that the West CIT selected the Fowler/Tiedeman intersection safety improvements be put in place of the 130th/Winterlake connection. There was a statement within the document from the West CIT about an opinion from people who were not present at the meeting. Mr. Karls objected to the representation made in the document for persons who did attend the CIT meeting. Mr. Karls advised that the process has been frustrating. He requested the Council take everything into consideration. He noted the opposition of the neighborhood to the bridge connection. CITY COUNCIL. MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 16 MIN . Jerry Swank, 13805 S.W. 118th Court, Tigard, Oregon, testified that e 'r ir- n oiwr , he 1rveS 155,01 feet from the Terrace ai.- _r_;_He referred to a stream along the proposed trail and problems with stream channel a..h:ah ^A in Fan ~nrrerl'~f'~ Un ftA-;c ^A +k-+ 4- an -1 - /a4 G-- nm a7waVtlt ~~ov. .VVYVV aV a/V . awaw~waA HIGaa aew 11I1;4ja/1 things affected the stream channel: the rupture of a water main in the Arlington Ridge subdivision and the accelerated building on Bull Mountain. He noted there is a rapid degradation of the stream system. He cited concerns with dealing with future situations such as this and requested the City review practices. Kathleen Meu6naid, 12930 S.W. Glacier Uly Circle, Tigard, Oregon testified in opposition to the Capital improvement project listing, specifically objecting to the 130th/Winterlake connection. She noted that over 133 Comprehensive Plan amendment applications had been submitted since the Plan was adopted. During this 12-year period, there have been 84 Comprehensive Plan changes approved. With regard to emergency access, she advised she contacted Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. TVF&R said that the subject is in compliance with access requirements. Ms McDonald disputed the notion that people opposed to the connection were trying to preserve an elitist, private back-yard park. Ms. McDonald cited the growth which has occurred on Bull Mountain and said that traffic studies had not been done to take into consideration the accelerated growth. Ms. McDonald noted safety issues for the park and advised that more fencing is needed. She referred to the Planning Commission deliberations. She said that two members of the Planning Commission, who voted for the CIP priority list, were not familiar with the area. She advised the Planning Commission chair voted against the extension. Ms. McDonald reported she had learned that Mr. McAdams had submitted inquiries questioning whether there was a conflict of interest on the part of two Council members. She cited concerns G with money spent to have the City Attorney investigate this matter. Ms. McDonald advised that taxpayer dollars expended so far were under $30,000. If the City continues, an additional $970,000 would be spent. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINU`T'ES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 17 4 F® Ms. McDonald said that she hoped to see "democracy in action" and MM MM to "keep promises made..." In response to a question from Councilor Hawley, Ms. McDonald responded that she would want to see a Comprehensive Plan amendment the "85th" amendment. C. Council discussion followed (highlights follow): It annaarc that the only Controversial itenn on C.IP list was the -rr 130th/Winteriake Street connection. • Council discussed the Terrace Trails situation the pathway appeared to be extremely long without between points without any pedestrian access. • Council discussed stabilization of the stream near Terrace Trails. • Council discussed whether to separate streets from the rest of the CIP. Council decided to consider the entire CIP list. • Council discussed issues surrounding the 130th/Winterlake connection. > Councilor Rohlf expressed concerns that some of the conditions experienced on S.W. North Dakota Street would occur in this neighborhood. > Council discussed the option of placing the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection improvements on the priority fisting in place of the 130th/Winterlake connection. This intersection may be eligible for TIF funds. There was discussion on additional complexities (i.e., annexation of the area to the City. > Councilor Hawley referred to concerns that there had not be any proposal for a Comprehensive Plan amendment for this connection over the past year. > Councilor Hunt noted he favored the connection and would not favor inserting the Tiedeman/Walnut imnrnvamantc in place of the 130th/Vifinterlake Drolect. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 13, 1995 -PAGE 18 > Councilor Scheckla referred to oast decisions where u elm; 100uvD eau UVV~ 1 V~ ww~.v., va rrvvaev . H" f luttlU 'Hai deveiOpers io- avid -Vi Nr obila i l remaining which needed to be resolved. He noted Police Department access and said he would go along with the recommendation on the CIP list made by the Planning Commission and City Staff. He noted Summerlake Park was a City park representing an investment for all people in the City. > Councilor R.:)hlf referred to the low voter tUr i¢out number when the park bond measure was approved. He also referred to the TVF&R official position that the emergency access was adequate. He noted this was a neighborhood connectivity would encourage traffic from (Beaverton. He said that it might be easier to fix the problems on Brittany Street rather than to open up the connection. He also proposed redesign to inhibit cut-through traffic. > Mr. Wooley clarified some issues with regard to the listing of the CIP projects and the manner in which the projects are funded. > Mayor Nicoli noted concerns with construction of the project from Hawksbeard to Scholls Ferry Road. He also noted it may be possible to improve the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection even though it is not currently within the City limits. He referred to the Boundary Commission position on circumstances similar to this which appear to be favorable if the City would want to improve the intersection. There was discussion on postponing the construction of the Hawksbeard to Scholls Ferry Road connection until development occurs. There was discussion about installing speed humps in the area to slow down traffic. d. Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to accept the Capital Improvement Priority listing with the following changes: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 19 Sol= 31111 % 11 RMI; > $367,021 allocated for the construction of 130th 71 Avenue from! lia-w fits-884 m t^: c_hAEEs Perry. Prior] hn .•A.YfA..AMA frr%m tha list said to rAmain unallncated. - > Add $5,000 for the development of a second access to the Terrace Trails pathway, suggesting that funding come from the SDC contingency. Motion was adopted by a 3-2 vote. (Mayor Nicoll and r%...nnilArc I-7t er++arsrl Ci+6+0v ldn ~iCtoii °vstc"• Councilors Hawley ® VN4..v..v... v..a 1 V%A a7\ol IvV.~.w . _ and Rohif voted "no.") e. There was notation that stream stabilization issues would be addressed by staff; funding source to be identified. 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS • Councilor Hunted requested that Items 3.2a and b. be reviewed by Council separately from the Consent Agenda. These two items were the Council Calendar and the Tentative Agenda list. After discussion, Council agreed that a special Council meeting would be scheduled on July 6, 1995, at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Council groundrules. • Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to cast the City of Tigard's vote for Mayor Nicoli to serve as the Washington County cities' representative to the Metro Policy Advisory Committee. (MPAC) The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohif and Scheckla voted "yes.") > Board and Committee appointments: After review by City Administrator Monahan of the upcoming board-and-committee vacancies, Council consensus was to: • Reappoint George Burgess and Joyce Patton to the Budget Committee (Note: Councilor Hunt will join Mayor Nicoli to conduct interviews of candidates for board/committee appointments) CITY COUNCIL. MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 20 r LL-A • 'w"i 6'aiCe"vC H 1:v1 NOr.::.i 1-1 Ulu d! uv roallllllu VUI 11711 lanns"l ll Sol l l~ 61 om have expired. Commissioners Brian Moore and Rur riuil: u heva indicated they would like to be reappointed; Chair Milt Fyre advised that he would not want to be reappointed but would continue serving until his position was filled. • Conduct interviews for they expired Library Board terms with the assistance of a member from Library Board. ® Council heard an update from Mayor Nicoll concerning discussions with ODOT. Mayor has been working with ODOT officials to determine ODOT's concerns with regard to Tiigard's planning for Triangle area. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 12:40 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 1:32 a.m. Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City Recorde yo , ity of Tig d V Date: ccm0613.95 i CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 13, 1995 - PAGE 21 Ell RMENEWAMMINIMMUM SWUM I COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER% INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 NoticeTT 8227 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED ®City of Tigard e ❑ Tearsheet Notice JUN 1 4 199 5 ®13125 SW Hall Blvd. e ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard,Oregon 97223 CITY OF YlGAN.G AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON ) COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS, )ss' 1, Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and say. that I am the Advertisin Director, or his principal clerk, of theTgard-Tualatin Mmes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 153.020; published at m; card in the aforesaid county sind state; that the city Council Meeting a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: June 8,1995 QA_ Subscribed and sworn o before me thisQth day of June, 19 OFFICIAI. kL ROBV.' BURGESS ( ? NOTARY pUBI.IC - OPEC-ON r No Public for Oregon COMMISSION NO. 024552 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16, 1997 i My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT MEN moo= The fa7lotyupg ri eetsng ti~ghlegE ~s a.-e published fa yotu 6A agendas maybe obtained from the City ReGOrder, 13125s- W Halfl 3oWevard, Tigard, Oiegot+ 97223. or by calWag 639=4171- aw COUNCM BUSINESS,A~EE'T IG JUNE 13, ; -'TIGA b CITY HALL-=TOWN HAIL 13125 S t1V. HALL: BOULEVARD TIG MRD OREGON Owuy mczuug_~a~w nvLk ~,onicrence ii~ix~cn~ ~v,~v r m:l ® Agenda Review Busut , . , ess Meeting (Tovim Hall) (7:30 Public Hearings 199495 Uses of Stag Revenge Sharing o . 1994-95 Fiscal Year, Budget:. Public Opportunity_to Comment ~ Capital Improvement'ProjeetP.-DOrity List Oidinanae`:Consideiatian „0 4, Parking Itestrictsons on Dur6A toad B.etwden-S.W. 72nd Avenue:and UpperBoones FerryRoad ® Parking Restrictions on Bonita Road East of 83rd Court (Note: Separate Code Section already addresses portion west of 83rd Court) ; o Parking Restrictions on S.W. North Dakota Street,Between . ! $cholls.Fenry Road and Springwood Drive Executive Session - 9 The : ncilmaygo into,Ezecutive Session undr Tigard City, the provisions pf,ORS 192.660!(1) (d); (e);,& (h) toWscuss labor relations; r- - roperty transactions, current and pending litigation moues Local Contract Review Board Meeting T18227. Publish June '8,1995,_.i 111!1IM, 111!1i~121!i~ !t1111111 Ill I;,, IS All 11:12 111121 1: 11 1 1!, EMS CITY OF TIGAR®, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF rub 1 u In the Matter of the Proposed ) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington )SS. City of Tigard ) L_j i I, begin first duly sworn, on oath, 04 depose say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a cop of Ordinance d--1 Number (s) Q~ 14 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated to 1 B 1 q copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the a, day of QAA Au,.- 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Library, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Water Department, 8777 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this a day of +L . 19 9 5 oF Notary P lic for Oregon M JO ANN NN HAY ES NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. y 042148 os, 1999 My Commission Expires: ma.-, S, I q 917 MY G~M MI98ION WIRES MAY O5, login\lo\affpost CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AMk ORDINANCE NO. 95-, lj_ AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Pursuant to ORS 221.770, the City hereby elects to receive state revenues for fiscal year 1995-96. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By Ur1 &AIMOUS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this ! 3 ~h day of 1995. Catherine Wheatley, Cit Recorder APPROVED : This 3 day of y~f.Li 1995. -May,eL - City Of Tigard Approved s to form: Council President Ci y ttorney / / 3.n }f- q Date I certify that a public hearing before the Budget Committee was held April 20, 1995, and a public hearing before the City Council was held on June 13, 1995, giving citizens an opportunity to comment on ise of State Revenue Sharing. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder Date MEN-am MOORE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE Nv^. 95- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T.M.C. 10.28.130 BY ADDING PORTIONS OF S.W. DURHAM ROAD WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED. WHEREAS, TMC 10.28.130 prohibits parking at any time on portions of certain public streets in Tigard; and, WHEREAS, in order to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic on the portion of SW Durham Road between SW 72nd Avenue and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, the street has been designed to allow no on-street parking. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: TMC 10.28.130, designating the portions of public streets where parking is prohibited at all times, is hereby amended by adding the following: 11(86) On both sides of SW Durham Road between SW 72nd Aye_nue and Upper Boones Ferry Road." SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By (,LhCdduMLSLt,CL vote of all Council members present after eing read by number and title only, this 146 day of , 1995. Catherine -Wheat-ley, City-- ,eee-rde-r APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 1995. Mayo-r Paul Hunt, Council President Approved as to form: • Ci ttorney Date rw/durham.ard ORDINANCE No. 95- /3 Page 1 ~ - 11119, R CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 95-~ ASK AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T.M.C. 10.28:130 BY ADDING PORTIONS OF S.W. BONITA ROAD WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED. WHEREAS, TMC 10.28.130 prohibits parking at any time on portions of certain public streets in Tigard; and, WHEREAS, in order to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic on Bonita Road, the street has been designed to allow no on-street parking; and, WHEREAS, on-going construction on Bonita Road is completing the design plan. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: TMC 10.28.130(72), designating the portions of Bonita Road where parking is prohibited at all times, is hereby amended to read as follows: "(72) Along both sides of SW Bonita Road between SW 83rd Court and Interstate Highway 5." SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By U MCl YO MQU5 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1995. Catherine Wheatley, Citly Recorder 1 APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 3,&h day of /IC.~~ , 1995. 3extes-Ai~ea~~,--Mapes Approved as to form: Paul Hunt, Council President City At orney /~~rY X15 Date LM% OORStH.4+tQ ORDINANCE No. 95-i-L_ Page 1 IBM M1,11 l~ 1 C. rY*'CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 95-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T.M.C. 10.28.130 BY ADDING PORTIONS OF S.W. NORTH DAKOTA STREET WHERE PARKING IS PROHIBITED. WHEREAS, = 10.28.130 prohibits parking at any time on portions of certain public streets in Tigard; and, WHEREAS, in order to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic on the portion of SW North Dakota Street between Scholls Ferry Road and Springwood Drive, the street has been designed to allow no on-street parking; and, WHEREAS, on-going construction on North Dakota Street is completing the design plan. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: TMC 10.28.130, designating the portions of public streets where parking is prohibited at all times, is hereby amended by adding the following: 11(87) On both sides of SW North Dakota Street between Scholls Ferry Road and Springwood Drive." SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By U n &n 1 r` o vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this i3 h'' day of % UAMA, , 1995. Catherine Wheatley, C&by Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this '3 1 day of 1 (ra, , 1995. daftee- -1a e64-i T - Ma-yew Approved as to form: Paul Hunt, Council President City At orney Date KIM ift rw/nodak.ord ORDINANCE No. 957)5 Page 1 R 11 AGENDA ITEM, NO. 2' = VIS7k 0R'S,AG.END DATE: June J3, -I (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED 5tC'K P&GW'C 166M ovA(W UM~sp 10 r - J-1 og n o v s tor9.s t MGM i SEEM AGENDA ETEM NO. z dSroOR'S Ac EivD~► PAcaE 2 DAitt: June 15. iWO', (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Aw.- - ii • - - i-.-~~ T4... /~w..rtwil •.aric.hec. ~n hanr frv+m vc~l t nn -qua- ease sign on the appropriate sheet Tor ii5~cv-• ~~-Ce- other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF NAME, ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC CONTACTED I - L AOL oy n rs.sh: - 0 . MEMORANDUM 1qW CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bill Monahan, City Administrator FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder DATE: June 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Metzger Park Local Improvement District Bill, the Metzger Park Local Improvement District matter has been rescheduled on the Council Tentative Agenda from June 20 to July 11 due to some changes that occurred with process and timing by the County. In researching the process to follow with regard to Tigard's responsibility to give input to the Metzger Park Local Improvement District assessment increase proposal, I learned the following: • Washington County Support Services Department requested, and was granted; an extension with Department of Taxation on the filing of assessment for the LID. • July 13 - Washington County Board of Commissioners will consider a request to hold a July 25, 1995, public hearing on the LID increase. • June 14 - Washington County will send out public notice on the 7/25/95 hearing to ALL property owners affected by the LID. • June 14 - Formal request from Washington County to be sent to the Tigard City Council outlining what type of approvals are needed from the City of Tigard. • July 25 - Public hearing on LID assessment increase. LID assessment increase will go into effect unless 51% of the property owners object. Originally, we were going to schedule a public hearing on June 20 for our Tigard property owners for the purpose of getting input from them on the LID assessment increase. Last week, I was assembling packet information and working with Maggie Daly from the City Attorney's office to decide exactly what kind of hearing and notice would be required for the June 20 meeting. I called Mr. Larry Eisenberg, Facilities Manager at the County because the law office needed more specific information from the County in order to determine what kind of notice was needed. This is when I found out that the County was not going to need a decision from Tigard as soon as previously thought; in fact, they will not present us with a r-wa t i It fui.auczi icgucaat ~ i+.iaa.i..L after June 13. - a. vi . MOM We now have a list of all Tigard property owners (approximately ~ i.AA i - weel- a Ei a..CUCv@X6, f~Zr ..5.w..I '°°`.`~Zes4 the formal r 7 ~ ~ :3c ~aavcabc.: .~v.'~ _ ~ e~LeSt from Washington County asking the Tigard council to approve thG assessment increase and also 'to approve the LTD on an ongoing basis. With regard to notice, it appears that a newspaper notice would be the only notice required. However, because we do have the list of all the property owners we can send notice to all the Tigard property owners. Last time, we sent notice only to the largest property owners because of time constraints. Council direction is requested as to whether we should send out notice to all the Tigard properties for a July 11 hearing. This hearing will be to consider a resolution approving the county's request to approve the LTD assessment increase and to approve the LID on an ongoing basis. h:\login\cathy\cwc0609.95 lRi on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount Depending o „e oorr n _ = m n'ir_s. The .Er at.- s~_... •e a.. :s s:. _ :..a...a t.., ..w v.v.. 1 _y "Ofiay further limit time if necessary. Wnuen vorrni ia, no Aga al-clyo a~,MrQW1G9vU" uy l1 IV vvu19a+u supplement oral testimony. AGENDA 1'TEM tai 4 DATE: June 13,..,1995 PUBLIC HEARING - 1994-95 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING PLEASE SIGN IN TO "TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS AGENDA ITEM NO: ;4 71 - PLEAS M P-0,611 4T iroponent - (speaking in Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) - Name, dress an one Name, No. Address an Phone No. Nair. s, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Addrwm and Phone No. Name, AddreiiTand one No. e, rasa an one No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. e, Address an one Name, No. Address an one No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. 11 51~1 113 1! _Depending on the number of p;?:'e^n wishing to tggtrfy, the Chair of tha C:nl inril may limit thE2 amount - time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair Z-.-L&--_ 1:--.:+ 46-n, if ncr•gMccarv Wriitcn nnmmantc nra Riwavc annrar_iatcarl by the r.m ennil t0 111C1y 1E.-l51.Wa IIIIna u... .....~~...~...J. -rr•---~_~~. -J - supplement oral testimony. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 DATE: June 13, 1995 PUBLIC BEARING - 1994-95 FISCAL. YEAR BUDGET PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS 10111111110FAMMEWISM if; r v As 1 ` --gym PLEME PRINT ProQOne- nt n (Speaking -In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) Name, ress an Phone No. Nume, Address an one No. 1)l a FI dl!~~arn s 5Qj k~ Chris n S V1 /3420 s, to. ~+rrf~ac~q /Slo~S S~ I r~ ✓cb ©r@,c ,caw g7Vo~2 3 c Ti 11,0p , Ole 17 a 2 ~ Name, Address and Phone No. Nam 6, Address and Phone No. V-00 !Fz-c-N(w U). rzlvp&c-~ 17G A P- Dl~ 1- 2 Z~ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. I Name, Address an ore Name, 143. Address- an one No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. N Age Name, Address an one e, ress an one . Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Rcw~ w .i 4 Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair qfay further ;i-mit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement ore^' testimony. 1 A E CiA l'TEM NO. C DATE: June 13, 1995 PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PR1ORITV LIST PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACKED SHEETS Iggimij, ii r 71 AGENDA ITEM NO? S PfLEME PRINT kr'o- ponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking (Against) Name, rase and one No. Name, Address end Phop® No. she l~C Rdanv Chr~:5 5 f' ~ J (GZ SYd Orel C'>!n/ q'7~/z 3, ► I 0 7aa \ Neme~Add d / v9`~ L~ No ~r ~e No. X'-'XrvS-cd CS, di, 01 g_\.j ~4 CA-' C? 0, draw and (57,9 P7rhone - No x-391- 9 OG 7 e, Ad ress gind Pho a No. ~ 1 11' / 2 S c,J ~/i cT ~G* 'J~ ~"~~A~ D 42 9'7 2 2-3 7;1~ e_, rasa an one Name, ro an ne Jfj t ccka*-l / -/~l c izC-5/1 (Ax>arhs Al) ~ SSu/ /IL 6- Sl2-w S.w• 32iC!!s riGU) C(K- n6kc'o Co- 9 zzS -r i c ,a c. D b e. 9722 _ Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. (2~~ W f-I 06 6- -3or Rre 15o-,, 123 5 Sw L-l" -'rUE LAJLA- P(L Nam ~~~2D, 9722 a~f d~ `1Dz?o- re ss an one e, Address an one No. Ci F-0 ~ ~ -e QQ.6C~'~ ~ ar T w t c. (C \ii J (P S ~ Lc7 PFD eve v-o ~w(Ce ol. `t)ZZ 10 Name, Address gnd Phone No. N e, Address and Phone No. ar j La I G 1 l Z~ 30 s uJ S~aCc~` Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address d Phone No. I (p Svc £S G4f+-V;7,f -rt 6 ~ a2 T IZ,3 SLY ~(d7 Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. low ~c Ali z An rtc~ 9"71 1 -94d V~~b+fz~lj cry 7hia"-d L a~a2-3 r N12% I!, ME PLEASE PRIM! roponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) 'Narne, Address an one No. Nam , Aaaress ana nhI rr fi v~4r✓ l 6 `r - 6 dJ %?c ZAh- Ur S z _3 C Address an one Name, No. Address an one No. Name, Address and Phona No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address an one Name, No. ress an one . Name, dress and one No. Name, dress and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phons No. :Jame, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address a^.d Phone No. Name; Address and Phone No. ® 11 og n o test - Ilia= N PLEIASE PRINT roponent - (Speaking In Favor) opponent - (Speaking Ay-t ki9 *L) Name, dress and one e. Ad rasa and one No. ii Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Nama, Address and Phone No. e, dress and one No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Name, Address and Phone No. Narfe, Add gs~soand Phona No n I,GUI~I i /9 A A, 1A POO U-1 II Tj Aj F) g ZZ3 II t6jin o tam Ing 17 f • T H ,'F- QC&d m eta' W~ Aft ®nna awl i VW b _ 1 /3r P nNI -1 T H C A T R E G O M P A N Y 13960 SOUTH WEST ROSHAK RD. T I Q A 'to. O R E G O N 9 7 2 2 4 P H O N E So 3-63 9• 6 1 4 6 Dear City of Tigard Council Members,, I am writing to you on behalf of the (Music in the Park'Commitee), Martha Bishop and Mary Payne have already done alot of the work on getting this event off the ground. I'have received daily reports on the progress being made on getting more volunteers ie Garden Clubs,'Republican Womens Club, Pat and Art Biggs, Pat Whiting as well as many others.Publicity has been covered on all major newspapers,as well as contacting local bands and choirs. The Arts Commission of Tigard Tualatin and Sherwood(ACTTS) has taken the Music in the Park Commitee under their 501(c) (3) unbrella for the purpose of this commitee obtaining funding as a tax write off,as well (ACTTS) can also write grants to obtain funds to pay bands to perform next summer in Cooks park like they have for Sherwood,s Music in the Park!!! No matter how well the Sept 10th concert is,I feel it will take 'a three year. time-spand to get people use to the idea,Lake Oswego began their Music in the Park three years ago with no one and last year they had over 3000 people I might also add that which ever option you choose a feasibilty report should .still be done and all possi VJl.Lties lookeLL at before a ,pet11aaerlt stage 1s constructed although I feel'that the council is moving in the right direction with this community project and again-proving to the public that Tigard is alot more then one long highway surronded by restaurants. 'Oel Council Agenda Item 3,a Q, MEMORANDUM - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 1-V vaj^r ="A city Council ~ : aavaava a.sa+iv FROM: Bill Monahan, City Administrator DATE: May 3, 1995 SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, May - July, 1995 Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. June 6 Tues Tigard Triangle Traffic Study Information Meeting (7 p.m.) - Town Ball *13 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting *20 Tues Council Study Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) *27 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Fleeting July 4 Tues Independence Day - City Offices Closed *11 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting *18 Tues Council Study Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) *25 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting August *8 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting ~15 'TM~ea Council Study Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) *22 Tues Council Meeting - (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting h:\login\cathy\cccal 121 1 1-15, 1, rM Council Agenda item 0115Ig5 Council Meeting of 3.2h. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bill Monahan, City Administrator DATE: June 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Tentative Agendas - 1995 Attached is the June edition of the updated Tentative Council Agenda. Please note the following important issues have been scheduled as follows: Budget and Capital Improvement Project Priority Listing June 13 Joint Meeting with CIT Facilitators and Joint Meeting with Tree Task Force June 20 Dolan Public Hearing June 27 Metzger Park LID - Public Input; Update on Interfaith Outreach; and Reimbursement District Ordinance July 11 Natural Resource Comp Plan Changes; School Capacity Issues; 99W Transpor- tation Issues and the Use of Retention Ponds throughout the City July IS Joint Meeting with Library Board and Council Review of Solid Waste Policies August 15 You will notice a number of items to be scheduled on the last page of the Tentative Agenda. I will be reviewing these issues with the appropriate staff members to review staff work programs and then assign tentative Council dates so Council can address these issues during 1995. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please call me. wnc0605.95 I -1 Immill 'all Tteyn Wr% (DI1314c m7l --M ® Council Meetina of a h BELOW IS A TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF COUNCIL AGENDAS FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS. PLEASE CONTACT CATHY WHEATLEY, 639-4171, EXT. 309 IF YOU HAVE CHANGES, COMMENTS, OR QUESTIONS... Updated: June 1, 1995 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE - CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS June 13 - August 22, 1995 June 13 TV • STUDY METING (6:30 PM) AGENDA REVIEW • BUSINESS MEETING (7:30 PM) 1. ROLL CALL 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA >APPROVE MINUTES 5/23 >ABANDON ODOT RIGHT OF WAY @ 72ND >DEDICATE RIGHT OF WAY ON 109TH EXTENSION >LCRB AUTHORIZE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR INTERIM WATER SUPPLY WITH TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BID AWARD - CONSTRUCTION OF SW BAYLOR ST WATER SYSTEPS INTERTIE AWARD WATER RATE STUDY CONTRACT BID AWARD - BONITA RD " BID AWARD - BULL MOUNTAIN RD " BID AWARD - SHADY LANE STORM DRAINAGE PURCHASE LED RETRO FIT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL " BID AWARD - MAIN STREET BID AWARD - GRANT AVENUE SIDEWALK 4. ADOPT BUDGET (Wayne L.) ..(WILL INCLUDE MATERIAL FOR MUSIC IN THE PARK)... 5. PUBLIC HEARING - STATE SHARED REV (Wayne L.) 6. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Randy W.) 7. PARKING ORDINANCES (Randy W.) DURHAM RD. BONITA RD. NORTH DAKOTA STREET June 20 No TV • WORKSHOP MEETING (6:30 p.m.) 1. JOINT MEETING WITH CIT FACILITATORS 2. TREES (REVIEW OF TASK FORCE PROPOSAL) (CAROL L.) W LLA A= TV • STUDY MEETING (6:30 PM) • BUSINESS MEETING (7:30 PYL) 1. ROLL CALL 2. VISITORS AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA >APPROVE MINUTES >MUNICIPAL JUDGES" CONTRACTS >LCRB 4. DOLAN PUBLIC HEARING July 11 TV • STUDY. W?:ETING (6:30 PM) • BUSINESS MEETING (7:30 PM) 1. ROLL CALL 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA >APPROVE MINUTES >APPOINT COUNCILOR TO HISTORIC SITES & DISTRICT COMMITTEE . (DURHAM SCHOOL PROJECT) - (DUANE) >LCRB 4. METZGER PARK LID - PUBLIC INPUT 5. PUBLIC HEARING - CPA 95-0002/ZON 95-0003 (PACIFIC CREST) (RAY) 6. PUBLIC HEARING - ZCA 95-0003 (MURDOCK) (RAY) 7. UPDATE: INTERFAITH OUTREACH (BILL) 8. REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE (RANDY) July 18 No TV • WORKSHOP NEEPING (6:30 PM) 1. NATURAL RESOURCE COMP PLAN CHANGES - FORESTS, PARKS (CAROL) 2. SCHOOL CAPACITY (CAROL) 3. TRANSPORTATION - 99W (CAROL) 4. USE OF RETENTION PONDS THROUGHOUT THE CITY (RANDY W) July 25 TV • STUDY MEETING (6:30 PM) • BUSINESS MEETING August 8 TV • STUDY MEETING (6:30 PM) • BUSINESS MEETING lijil F 7AM august 15 No TV • STUDY MER'ING (6:30 PM) JOINT MEETING WITH LIBRARY BOARD COUNCIL REVIEW - SOLID WASTE POLICIES INCLUDING RATE SETTING PROCEDURES (WAYNB) August 22 • STUDY MEETING (6:30 PM) • BUSINESS MEETING 161 TO BE SCHMUr Sept. • Triangle - Workshop Meeting (Carol) Sept. Transportation Systems Study - Workshop Meeting: (Carol) Nov. Annexation Comp Changes - Workshop Meeting: (Carol) Nov. Transportation Comp Changes - Workshop Meeting: (Carol) The following items represent a list of potential agenda items which are expected to be scheduled within the next several months. These items are at various stages in preparation for Council review. Some are pending due to timing considerations; for example, other events may need to occur before the staff report can be completed. A few of these items are "housekeeping" in nature and are pending because of other priorities for Council review and availability of staff to work on those issues. If you have any questions, please contact Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder, at 639-4171, Ext. 309 • Tree Ordinance (hearing date TBA) • "Alcohol" ordinance • Planned Development Ordinance • Update on Notification process - proposed amendments to land use notification procedures • Community Development Fee Increases - Resolution • Policy on carrying weapons on public.property • Board and Committee Rules (i.e., term limits?) • Dolan responses - Code amendments necessary to comply with the court decision • Council's philosophy on who should pay for growth • What is Council's policy on half-street improvements? • Discussion of restrictions placed on the City by State law • Ordinance amending underground utilities ordinance • Proposed changes in utility billing (Wayne) • Council Groundrules (Bill) • Planning Fees (Bill, Dick) h:\login\cethy\tentagen 7,42t, AGENDA ITEM # 3.3 For Agenda of June 13,1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Abandonment of ODOT right of way at the new 72nd Avenue intersection at 99W. PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Council accept the proposed abandonment agreement for right of way to be abandoned by ODOT required for 72nd Avenue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the document. - INFORMATION SUMMARY ODOT has agreed to abandon some excess, existing right of way which followed the old right of way of 99W. Villa Ridge was the old 99W alignment and has en severed by the recently constructed 72nd Avenue/99W intersection roject. The project has been constructed and 72nd Avenue now occupies a portion of the excess right of way. Excess right of way is also being abandoned to the adjacent property owners on either side of 72nd Avenue in a separate action. The attached Resolution declares the Council's desire to accept the w Abandonment Agreement for right of way for 72nd Avenue. The agreement will transfer right of way from ODOT to the City. ` OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES No fiscal requirement. ga/72-odot.row I 7A& CITY OF TIGAR.D, • OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AN ABANDONMENT AGREEMENT, ACCEPTING RIGHT OF WAY FOR 72ND AVENUE FROM THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, in 1994, the 72nd Avenue/99W intersection project was constructed by the City of Tigard; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation desires to abandon excess right of way to the City of Tigard; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that the proposed ODOT right of way to be abandoned is required for public right of way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The City of Tigard hereby agrees to accept the abandoned ODOT right of way as described in the attached Agreement. A copy of the agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2: Further, the Tigard City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign the Abandonment Agreement. PASSED: This day of , 1995. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard Qa\72-odot.res•:.. RESOLUTION NO. 95- Page 1 1: il 211 Abandonment Retention Agreement No. 664 ABANDONMENT AGREEMENT 72nd and 99W Section Pacific Highway Washington County THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter called "State", and the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, by and through its City Officials, hereinafter called "City". 9 WITNESSETH RECITALS 1. For the purpose of furthering the development of a highway system adapted in all particulars to the needs of the people of the State of Oregon, State has found it necessary and desirable to relocate and construct the 72nd and 99W Section of the Pacific Highway, State I :ghway No. 99W in Washington County, Oregon. 2. Pursuant to ORS 373.010, whenever the route of any state highway passes through the corporate limits of any city, State may locate, relocate, reroute, abandon, alter or change such routing when in its opinion the interests of the motoring public will be better served. 3. Pursuant to ORS 366.300(3), State may abandon to the abutting property owners portions of the right-of-way of the former route of the highway that are no longer needed for public road use and are not owned by the Department in fee. 4. Pursuant to ORS 366.395, the State may relinquish title to any of its property not needed by it for highway purposes to any other governmental body or political subdivision within the State of Oregon, subject to such restrictions, if any, imposed by deed or other legal instrument or otherwise imposed by State. 5. The completion of construction of the relocated section of the Pacific Highway will make possible the elimination by State of portions of the former route, hereinaft,-r designated as Units A, B, and C, as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof. Unit C, as hereinafter TKA0141h Rev. 10/25/94 i Abandonment & Retention Agreement No. 664 described, is needed for the service of persons living thereon or for a community served thereby. Units A, and B as shown on Exhibit A, are no longer needed for public road use and are not owned by the Department in fee. 6. It is the purpose and plan of the parties hereto that Unit C be eliminated as a portion of the Pacific Highway and the state highway system; that the Unit pass to and vest in City; and that City maintain the Unit as a portion of its city road system as long as needed for the service of persons living thereon or a community served thereby; and that Units A and B be abandoned by State to the abutting property owners. NOW THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing RECITALS, it is agreed by the State and City as follows: TH[RqGS TO BE DONE BY STATE 1. State shall, by resolution, upon completion of construction of the 72nd and 99W Section of the Pacific Highway, formally elilrinate Unit C as (a) portion of the Pacific Highway and the state highway system, and all right, title, and interest of State in the Unit shall pass to and vest in City. Unit C is described as follows: Unit C All the land within the right-of-way boundaries of Pacific Highway, State i ighway 99W, lying southerly of a line described from centerline of said Pacific Highway, State Highway 99W as now located, defined as follows: Engineers Station Distance Left 22+78.05 94.00 24+13.60 88.00 and lying in Section 36, Township I South, Range I West Willamette, Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Except that portion of Pacific Highway, State Highway 99W lying in Unit A. TKA014.th Rev. 10/25/94 Abandonment & Retention Agreement No. 664 2. State shall, by resolution, upon completion of the 72nd and 99W Section of the Pacific Highway and opening of the same to public travel, abandon Units A and B to the abutting property owners. Units A and B are described as follows: Unit A All the land within the right-of-way boundaries of Pacific Highway, State Highway 99W, lying southerly of a line described from centerline of said Pacific Highway, State Highway 919W as now located, defined as follows: Engineers Station Distance Left 15+73.39 60.00 17+53.02 60.00 20+07.63 70.00 22+78.05 94.00 22+99.33 115.00 and lving in Section 36; Township 1 South, Range 1 West Willamette, Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Unit B All the land within the right-of-way boundaries of Pacific Highway; State Highway 99W, lying southerly of a line described from centerline of said Pacific Highway, State Highway 99W as now located, defined as follows: Engineers Station Distance Left 24+13.60 88.00 27+06.86 60.00 28+44.69 60.00 and lying in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West Willamette, Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. siIHLL r2«..n ueac portion or the right-of-way of the former Paci-`ic Highway, and that real property acquired by State for highway right-of-way and other public purposes, as shown on Exhibit A. TKA014.th Rev. 10/25/94 r r Abandonment & Retention Agreement No. 664 T -ENGS TO BE DONE BY CITY 1. City agrees to accept all of State's right, title and interest in Un t Q to accept jurisdiction and control over the property, and to maintain the property as a portion of its city street system as long as needed for the service of persons living thereon or a community served thereby. Any right-of-way being transferred in which State has any title shall be vested in city so long as used for public road purposes. If said right-of-way is no longer used for public road purposes, it shall automatically revert to State. 2. City shall pass an ordinance or resolution, as the case may be, authorizing Mayor and Recorder to enter into the agreement on behalf of City. GENERAL PROVISIONS The properties above described are relinquished and transferred subject, however, to the rights of any utilities located within said properties and further subject to the rights of the owners of said existing facilities, if any there be, to operate, reconstruct, and maintain their utility facilities presently located within said properties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written. TKA014.th Rev.10/25/'94 Rig 1012 m7l AWN, Abandonment & Retention Agreement No. 664 The Oregon Transportation Commission, by a duly adopted delegation order, authorized its Chairman or Vice Chairman to act in its behalf in approving this agreement. Approval was given for this agreement on by , which :approval is on file in the Commission records. The Chief Engineer was also authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. CITY OF Tigard, by and through STATE OF OREGON, by and t"uough its Cit, Officials its Department of Transportation By By Mayor Chief Engineer Date Date By APPROV Recorder By APPROVED AS TO LEGAL Region Manager S v CY VI By Assistant Attorney General Date TKR014.th Rev. 10/25/94 lo A IJ ~I(red l.vr° u!3L_ uNrr fl -u r T Y I f I•~ I OR ~y ~y .YL o ~I:tLAxl - / fO l7 A {Ov'Orf C F'10 d 601•~F' T b r 41 4 O R.oe7B4/i°hari..e A.bssr~~lf L1,3•L/G ~ O0NC0 ~ ~ A)<fA f0 BE ARAN / A0301111" "'Fory i STATE 'I HETAtiiFD 91 r / AREA To B~ AB~li~ONE~ Yo •crT.Y oFr~GpR0 .1 \ a Exhibit a ,a rC~i 08 LAO AGENDA ITEM # 3. . For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Dedication of Property purchased as right of way to the public. PREPARED BY: John Hadley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Dedication of property purchased for the extension of S.W. 109th Avenue to the public right of way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached resolution authorizing the dedication. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Property described in Exhibit 111" was purchased for the extension of S.W.109th Avenue. The property was Deeded to the City of Tigard and it needs o be dedicated to the Public in order to make the right-of-way of S.W. 109th 6 'enue continuous. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES johnrh\109th.ss e iilamlffnm-ll CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON - - RESOLUTION NO.'95- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE'CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY A DEDICATION DEED TRANSFERRING TITLE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "1" TO THE PUBLIC. WHEREAS, property has been deeded to the City of Tigard by Warranty deed recorded in Fee Number 94015432 of the Washington County Deed Records WHEREAS, the property was intended to be dedicated to the public for street right of way purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1_ The Tigard City Council hereby authorizes the City Administrator to sign a Dedication Deed dedicating the property described in Exhibit "1" to the public for street purposes. A copy of the description is attached hereto as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference. -40 PASSED: This day of , 1995. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder _ City of Tigard jchnrm109th.8X Z',...: EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROAD DEDICATION Being a portion of Lot 10 Willowbrook Farm, located in Section 10, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 as described in a deed to Kasch's Garden Centers & Nurseries, Inc., Recorded in October 2, 1989, in Fee No. 89-47454 of the Washington County Deed Records; thence S 890 27' 17" W, along the south line of said Fee No., a distance of 32.45 feet to a point on a curve to the right; thence along said curve with a radius of 230.00 feet a delta of 170 41' 58" (chord which bears N 260 29' 17" E 70.77 feet) a distance of 71.05 feet to a point on the east line of said Parcel 1; thence S 001 48' 01" E, along said east line, a distance of 63.04 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1,151 square feet. w! lij: ISEEMI xg 11:11 '12i, N.W. 1 /4 S.E. 1 /4 SECTION 10 T2S R1 W W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OREtGON T.L 400 N N89'25'27E frt. 4yF~ 269.75' q d - 26'34'47' < R + 230.00 T 58.58' t O? E L 114' CH SRC -3N49.37'40'E i N6SSS7 ~s~' Q< CH 0:-113,5 c Y `nN89'2T17-E_ h 295.02 p 17'44'58' 153flfl. s4 ft. 6555 -1 R 230.00' L15L sa ft. 0.35 acres 5 F= T . 35.81' 0.0 ocres N0028'38 w L m 71.05' 11.2? CS H2629'17'E I CO 70.77' 60 51'14' - - r R - 170.00' 3 o T - 99.85• N89ZTiTE L- ."q' L - 180.56' n CH SRC a S3329'26•w 288.24' 32.45 o CH 0. a 17Z 19' o p ~ 14'34'29' R - 230.00' o c T : 29.41' ~ L ~ 58.51' C CB N1021'03"E 9,206. so. ft. n 0.21 acres o CO - 58.35• T.L. 400 EXHIBIT N69'2?17•E = 0643 s3• 302 Si' m 46.61' R 195.00' 3 T 11.47' 4125'02• L =91• W rn ~ T + 1135 3 .00, + ^ o CH SRO a S06Z5'44'W /,46 1856'06• L . 26.90' °o ry CH D. d =90• 0 L . 10 0.0 CS a NOB-46'20•E c 1 v°~ CS S01'D440 CO - 26.86' S8927'17'W CO 105.27 Pt89ZT171E 56.04' 5.45 0 325.50' 61.45' H8927'17'E 200.22 & 74.58'26' 0 0 R e 135.00• C T n 103.54' L w 176.65' 0 G CS - N51.58'04' 0 ~L CO - 164.32' 79 39'36' o 27,554. sa Ft. R 195.00' 0 O 0 0.63 acres ~T 162.64 L - 271.71' O o W CS - N4937'29'E C0 - 249.50' ' 0 5b 3T v e 18'56'06' R 380.00 L 125.58 C C8 a 581D4.40'E G~ Co 125.01 .a T.L 700 N AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of June 13. 1,995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Authorize Intergovernmental Agreement for interim water supply with Tualatin Valle Water District. PREPARED BY: Ed Wegner DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK IVIA - ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Local Contract Review Board authorize a contract with Tualatin Valley Water District to purchase surplus water. - STAFF RECOMMENDATION The LCRB should authorize the contract with Tualatin Valley Water District. INFORMATION SUMMARY Through the Water Supply Update Plan by Murray Smith and Associates, ecommendation was made to develop additional interim supply sources. On arch 22, 1995, the Intergovernmental Water Board reviewed this contract and recommended that it be forwarded to the Tigard City Council for adoption. The staff and City Attorney have been working with TVWD staff on the final draft. This contract meets all the recommended revisions of the IWB, City Staff and TVWD. With your authorization of this contract, the contract will then be forwarded to TVWD for their Board approval. This contract allows the City of Tigard to purchase six million gallons of water per day from TVWD as various intertie projects are completed. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not approve this contract and purchase additional water from the City of Portland at a higher cost or place water restrictions on summer water usage when the City of Lake Oswego cannot meet our summer water demand requirements. FISCAL NOTES The initial water purchase price from TVWD is $0.781 per 100 cubic feet. Lake Oswego water rate for this summer is undeterminded at this time, however, the current rate is $0.57 per 100 cubic feet. The water rate to rchase water from the City of Portland is $1.21 per 100 cubic feet. All (Whese rates are considered in the 1995/96 fiscal year budget. JUN-01-95 THU 14:25 MMY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P.02 AGREE WNT FOR WATER SU"LY .i ,.7ai L., '1'H1gA ....-.n` » rr 77T V 1v ua.is « C LT1ilC:L':t!'[ ~Sf:"+d!! te f7~rua a atuv a.aaa AL% ntr caac~ tavc 1995, by and between the CITY OF TIGARD. a municipal corporation (here called "City°) and TITALAMN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a domestic water supply district formed under ORS Ch. 264 (herein called "District" 1. RECITALS: A. City is duly authorized and foamed under statutes and its charter. District is a domestic water supply district. organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oregon. D. City presently provides water service to its residents and. also pursuant to separate intergovernmental cooperation agreements, water service to the citizens of the Cities of Durham, King City and the Tigard Water District. The City ac+s'oni "raehalf of the Cities of Durham and Bing City and the Tigard Water District, therefore, all service and commodity provided by the District to the City shall also be for the benefit of the other parties named herein. C. ORS 190.003 to 190.110 authorizes units of local government to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the performance of their duties or for the exercise of powem conferred upon them, and agreements for the sale of surplus water are expressly authorized. D. District determined that it is in the best interests of its rate payers for District to en`..er' into tlAc contract for the sate of surplus water. E. City has agreed that execution of a long-term agmement for the purchase of water from District will provide greater h1wHhood of reliable water supply to City. Page I Agreement far Water Supply JUN-01-95 THU 14:25 MURRAY. SMITH & ASSOC. - PAX NO. 503 225 9022 P.03 F. The service and commodity provides e y Dia=Y.e' a_° ° sPee-bgt cOnt-pct .r _ service and are not provided by Distrlet as a common utility service. 1"EREFDRE, the parties agree as follows, 1. Su f Surplus Water and Term of Agreement, a. Subje& to the othex Provisions of this Agreement, District WM furnish to City and those customers of the City named in B. above, a firm supply of potable, surplus water for City's present water service area for a ten (10) year period beginning July 1, 1995 through June 30, 2005, subject to renewal, extension, or termination and on the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement. The parties understand and agree that this Agreement is an irate-Am measure until City can secure a permanent source and that the City is presently pursuing the development of a long-term water supply as a permanent source. Therefore the City may, at its discretion, choose to purchase the maximum water purchase from District allowed under the terms of this agreement or some lesser amount on a year round basis or on a seasonal or intermittent basis. The development of the long-term supply by the City will.determine the City's actual need and use of water from the District which cannot at the time of executing this agreement be determined. b. City shall have the right to purchase up to six (6) million gallons per day of its water requirements from District. 2. Merges] _Consol'dation or other Cha6ge of Qrganizatia11 Should the: entire service area of City be merged, consolidated, or otherwise JoWed with District, or an entity created pursuant to FORS Ch. 450, them t1ds Agreement shall become null and void at the time of such transfer, and District or the page 2 - Agreemerd i ;i Mwte_r Suppily JUN-01-95 THU 14;26 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX HO. 503 225 9022 P.04 Aft, new entity shall become responsible for that portion of City's costs as set forth in Section i0 and 11. 3. Other Sources, City will also obtain. water from other state-approved sources. 4. C_Qnnectio Dieters and Store. a. City will proAde and maintain meters, valves, and controls, as approved by District, in proper order for water transmission line connections points. City will arrange to have i#, meters tested and calibrated by an independent tester quaMed to do such worts not less than annually. A copy of the test report shaU be forwarded to District. City shall own and maintain the transmission line necessa y to furnish water to City from the point of connection, as hereinabove set forth, to the existing distribution system of City. Unless otherwise agreed, City agrees to furnish at its expense any District-approved pumping stations, pressure sustaining valves, and other equipment, located within cr without the boundaries of District, which may he necessary to convey, control, and meter the water sold to City by District. Notwithstandir~g the foregoing, District shall maintain such valves and devices to control flows from its reservoirs and system to City's system. b_ It is intended that the District will deliver up to 6 million gallons of water per day to the District. The connection points may include, but shall not be limited to the following locations, 1. Baylor Reservoir 2. Cascade Avenue 3_ Creenburg Road Page 3 - Agreement for Water Supply ll~ JUN-01-95 THU 14;27 MURRAY. SMITH & ASSOC. FAX HO. 503 225 9022 P.05 ^--'.'"--i ~ i.._ that .i.l,'Fr'~,w•.el ^'ir~n.vM.n r. rv~intQ rrencr be LJ:+lJ.1~R i'Tj14 ~il6,y t~~A GI; 4ttga. R6t~LLLLVaavw. u..--do L i.,,.-..L..L. tom o . acNe;d by wrtiten cor-%nt 2--um. bit- w,.t,tse& d. Connection points sbait be maintained to provide flow in one direction, from District System(s) to City System(s). 5. Continuity of service a. By execution of this Agreement, City agrees that District will provide "firm" service of six (61 million gallons per day (MGD) for peak day usage. peak day demand shall mean the highest total peak day's flow at any time during the year. "T jrW service means that continuity shall be maintained by Distrait to the extent feasible in. the same manner as service to Disbiet's own inhabitants and other direct service customers. if a general emergency or water shortage requires restrictions on the delivery of water, then general restrictions placed upon deliveries to the firm purchasers shall be determined by a similar method to that used for resirieting deliveries to District by the City of Portland and District's direct service customers, to-wit: pro-rata reduction. if localized emergency problems o0cur, temporary se_*•~; intwmup+ians may result. b. It -is recognized by both parties that emergency emservatiOn measure may have to be implemented by District in order to meet an emergency *xuxditian. City shall implement such emergency com„servation measures as well, City shall be included in discussim-Is leading to the decision to implement the measures. C. DiGstriat will provide oral notice to City if District determines that such interruption or reduction is necessary or reasonable for system emergencies or to install, equipmerd, make repairs, replacements, investigations, and inspections or perform other maintenance worts in District's system or other parts of the system Page 4 - Agreement for Mater Supply JUN-01-95 MU 14:27 MMRAY, SMITE & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P.06 tsup City. Except in cases of emergency and in order thai City's opcWdRU s v:,ll not. be unreasonably interfered with, Distrkt also shall.0-ve City ter. (101, days w-aiEerl notice of any such interruption or reduction, the reason therefore, and the probable duration thereof. District agrees to exercise reasonable diligence and foros%ht to repair, replace, and maintain its facilities so as to provide a normal flow and pressure of water to the point of City's connections during the life of this Agreement, 6. 99ntmalj2 =and. The present peak day demgmd for the first year of this Agreement is six (8) million gallons per day. Each year thereafter, City will notify District of the forecasted peak day's demand and the average annual amount of water needed for the next current year And the next ten (10) years. District will conduct a study every four (4) years in conjunction with a rate study to forecast total District demand. This will incorporate the annual forecast of demand by City and other users. The amount of the quadrennial forecast deinand determined by the District will establish the City's firm allowable future annual peak days demand, up to 6 million gallons per day. 7. Water Quafity, The quality of water delivered to City's system under this Ag recment shall comply with all applicable provisions of state and federal law, rules and regulations. Both parties agree this provision will not be binding on District where an emergency eadsts and best efforts and reasonable prudence have been exercised. 8. Area Supplied. The City presently furnishes water to the residents within the boundaries of the City, to the City of King City, to the City of Mirham and to the Tigard Water District. Page 5 - Agreement for Water Supply Lou= JUM-01-95 THU 14;28 HURRAY, SMITH ~ ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P.07 8. Kna-Ami~abuity (Sale I mtt tfions. City agrees that it will not, without obtaining w-ritten approval of District, sell or "Wheel" (move or deliver through City pipelines) water to any other entity outside its corporate boundaries other than existing commitments previously described in Sectlan S. No rights may be assigned under this Agreement without the written consent of District, 10. Rates. City will pay montbly to District for all water passing meters described eaWve at a rate of seventy eight and one tenth cents (78.10) per 100 cubic feet (ccf), effective through June 80, 1996. Effective on each successive July 1 during the term of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof, the rate shall 6" retained, raised, or lowered in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 11 and adopted by resolution of the District. 11. Rate SeWng Criteria.. a. Rate-Nlalcing Principles and Policies. z Water rates shrill be established under this Agreement using the cost of debt service for transmission pipeline facilities jointly used, the cost of water purchased by the District from the City of Portland, the cost of acquiring alternate supply from the Hillsboro, Forest Grove, lBesnverton, Tualatin Valley Water District, Joint Water Conuniasion, the total flow metered annually through the transmission pipelines, the annual allocation of administrative and operation and maintenance casts by the %City of Portland on the transmission pipelines and a wheeling administrative charge by the District, Page 6 - Agreement for Water Supply JUN-01-95 THU 14:23 HUINY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 p,08 The initial water rates are stablLshc-d by the foll(ming components (assets and water volumed and values which will be revised annually to reflect the current water use experience and forecast of expenses: 1. Average Daily Water Volume of District through transmission pipelines was 20.33 million gallons per day or 9,9201,751-1010 cf 2. Water Charge for City of Partland Area 5 Rate $0.495 per 100 cf 3. Gravity Line Debt Service Paid to Portland for Washington County Supply fine - $1,329,380.68 $0.134 per 100 cf 4. Gravity Line Debt Service for Coats of Metzger Pipeline $790,429.08 $0.080 p.Pr 100 cf 5. All Line Operation & Maintenance and (ity of Portland Allocation of Administration $23,480.00 $0.002 per 100 of 6. Cost of Acquiring Alternate Supply from the Joint Water Commission $0.050 per 1001 cf 7. Wheeling Administrative Charge 4.020 per 100 of TOTAL COST OF WATSR PER 100 of $0,781 lu ti c= event of the addition, modification, ar substitution by District of assets that are used by District to supply City, the above description of facilities shall be mode led accordingly. These new facilities may be included in any computation page 7 - Agreement for Water Supply JUN-01-95 THU 14:29 MURRAY, SMITH & A5SOO. FAX NO, 503 225 9022 P.09 notwithstandit the fact that at the time of such inclusion they have not been formally included within this Agreement. b. New Expansion Faellittes Cost (Jointly Financed Facilities). New expansion facilities costs, if required, will be allocated between City and District service customers on the baais of their ultimate shares of the design capacities of these facilities. The allocation of the casts of seaeh faciliities will be bred on the projections made or reviewed by an independent consultant at the time of each rate study. c. Provision for Ftnergency Surcharge. 1. In the event of a severe drought, major catastrophe, or other extraordinary conditions that require emergency expenditures to maintain a sufficient water supply, it may be nece&%wy for District to impose on City, by resolution, an emergency surcharge equal to the actual coat of maintaining a sufficient water supply. 2. An emergency surcharge based on water usage may be implemented immediately upon passage of the authorizing resolution and apply to all regular billings thereafter transmitted and may continue as long as necessary to pay for emergency expenditures. 12. 11t Meters ;-Twt-J1ed to measure the volume of water sold by District to City shall be read periodically by representatives of District at times fixed by mutual a&eement of District and City. Representatives of City way be present at meter readings. District shall compute and render bills and statements to City by the I Sth day of each month. If the meters at any time fail to accurately measure the water passage through said meters, the ehwge for water used during the time said meters are out of order shall Page 8 - Agreement for Water Supply f7he -95 THU 14:30 MMRAY, SMITH & -ASSOC. FAR NO. 503 225 9022 P.10 based upon the average daily consumption as shown by said meters when in proper operating condition during a comparable Y *iod of service. District shall invoke City each month for water usage in the preceding month. 13. Pa cant. During the term of this Agreement, City shall, by the 30th day of each month, pay to District the stuns due based on the rates and charges provided in Section 10 and Y I of this Agreement. 14. Disput iaL&tornc3Ls' Fees.. Dispute shall he settled by proceedings in the Washington County Circuit Court unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. If suit or action is commenced, the prevaiUmg party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees, including any appeal therefrom. 15. 1AMitation o )Liability. With the e=eption of District's liability under Section 7. above, City recognizes and agrees that no Rability for damages shall attach to District hereunder on account of any failure to accurately anticipated availability of water, or because of actual failure of supply due to any damage to District's source, equipment, pipelines, or facilities caused by vandalism, war, riot, invasion, fire, governmental restrictions, strikes, inability to procure supplies, Act of God, or other causes beyond its control. 16. ggpx4ination and Consultation. District shall notify City not less than sixty (601 days prior to the date any proposed changes to rates and charges would become effective and provide copies of any supporting data with respect to such change, District and City agree to meet as neorssary to discuss problems and matters of mutual concern. including the rates Page 9 - Agreement for Water Supply JUN-01-95 THU 14:30 HMAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX HO. 503 225 9022 P.11 charged hereunder and modifications to this Agreement. should such be desired. It is agreed that City shall have the right to receive infiontkation ftom and to provide input to District on matters affecting the water system. Such matters include. but are not limited to, upcoming modifications to the system, anticipated costs, annual budget, rate adjustments, costs of service rams studies and operating constraints. 17. t4wita an g(Shpgly. District is not a. public utility district and Is not subject to the, jurisdiction of the Public Utility Commission, It is not engaged in the water business and was not created to sell water outside the corporated limits of District, except surplus water not needed by District and its inhabitants, and that the citizens and inhabitants of District have the prior riglit to use of the water distributed by the District water systems. District herewith expresses confidence in its desire and abMty to furnish sufficent surplus water to meet the nceds of City, but in the event there should ever arise in the future an inability on the part of District to furnish sufficient surplus water to City, it is understood that District shall not be liable on account of any such liability. l8. Phtnni - City agrees beginning duly 1. 1996, to provide District with an annual report and peak day total system demand information for the prior'0saal year. Said report shall be prepared and submitted for review within twelve months of the conclusion of each subsequent fiscal year. City shall also forecast its water requirements to be supplied by District in accordance with Section 6. City also agrees to report certain other data rekting to water supplies as may be required by District for water planning purposes, provided that supplying such Page 10 - Agreement for Rater Supply JUN-01-95 THU 14:31 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P.12 data shell be reasonably within the means of City. Records relevant to water supply and canssumption within the possession of District or City will be pranded Mhe wt::fr upon reasonable request. 19. Termination. This Agreement is conditioned upon the faithful perfmmarnee by both parties of all terms and provisions hereof which m its part are to be kept and performed- If City withdraws areas within the District's boundaries, then this Agreement shall terminate on the next succeeding June 30 from the effective date of withdrawal. Either party may terminate this Agreement on account of breach of its material terms by the other party upon 365 clays written notice. 20. Renewal. This Agreement may be renewed upon mutual agreement. If City wishes to renew, it shall give notice. in writing, to District no later than twelve (12) months prior Aft to expiration of the original term of this Agreement. The parties shall then meet to negotiate an extension which shall not exceed then (101 years. 21. ic:P. a. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall bo effective when actually delivered or when deposited in the mail, addressed to the parties at such address as either party may designate by written notice to each other: District: Administrator Tualatin Valley Water District 1850 SW 170th Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Page 11 - Agreement for Water Supply JUN-01-95 THU 14;31 I;URRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. PAX NO. 503 225 On" P. 13 City: City Administrator riey wr ~,s r.~ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 75gard, Oregon 97223 b. Communications related water system operations or supply shall be perl ed by the District Operations Manager or Engineer. Communications with the City shall be through the City Maintenance Services Director or the Director's dom. 22. Bffeetiv Date, This Agreement shall be effective as of day of . 1995, and continue until terminated as herein provided. IN WITNESS WFIMIEOF, Tualatin. Valley Water District, pursuant to a proper Resolution dated the day of , 1995, duly authorizing the President and Secretary of its Board of Commissioners to execute this instrument on its behalf, and the said City of Tigard, pursuant to a Resolution dated the day of, 1995, duly authorizing the Mayor and Recorder to execute this Agreement on its behalf, have caused this Agreement to be signed, in duplicate, as of the day and year first herein,above written. CITY OF TIGARD TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a municipal corporation a domestic water supply district by= by: Mayor President by: by; Recorder Secretary Page 12 - Agreement for Water Supply : 1 71 AGENDA ITEM # 3.5(o ,Mhl :::tea For Agenda of June 13. 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM S0.v1MARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of Contract for Construction of SW Baylor Street Water System Intertie PREPARED BY: Mike Miller DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK (A/Ik~_ ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the Construction of SW Baylor Street Water System Intertie. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Local Contract Review Board award the contract to J.L. Arndt Construction Company. INFORMATION SUMMARY tehrough our Water Supply Plan Update by Murray Smith and Associates, commendation was made to develop additional interim supply sources. On rch 22, 1995, the Intergovernmental Water Board reviewed this project and approved it along with revising the Fiscal Year 1994/95 Capital Improvement Budget. This project is scheduled for completion by July 10, 1995, this will enable us to purchase up to two million gallons of water per day f rom Tualatin Valley Water District. Engineer's Estimate is $76,000. Three bids were opened on June 1, 1995 and are as follows: Marshall Associated Contractors $74,556 Wyston Brown Construction Co. $69,935 J.L. Arndt Construction Co. $69,720 References have been checked for the low bidder, J.L. Arndt Construction Company. The references indicate a good work record for the company on similar projects. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Bypass this project and purchase additional water from City of Portland at a more expensive rate. FISCAL NOTES Qhe funding source is the Water Capital Improvement Fund that was revised by the IWB on March 22, 1995 and the Tigard City Council endorsed in April. G AGENDA ITEM # 3.5 C , For Agenda of June 13, 1995 C:1TY OF TIGAIRD; OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ~F ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of Water Rate Studv contract. PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK K44V~-J ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City of Tigard award a contract for a water rate study to CH2M Hill STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award contract to CH2M Hill. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City developed a scope of work and sought proposals from qualified firms to conduct a water rate study. Five proposals were received as follows: CH2M Hill $20,750 Donovan Enterprises 31,660 Black & Veatch 55,640 maEconomic & Engineering Services (EES) 29,750 avid M. Griffith 27,870 Staff narrowed the field by selecting the top three firms which were CH2M Hill, EES, and David Griffith. Black and Veatch were removed from consideration due to their high price and Donovan Enterprises were ruled out due to their lack of depth and experience compared to the other proposers. The remaining three were invited to make a presentation to the Intergovernmental Water Board on May 17, 1995. The Board, after reviewing the proposals and hearing presentations voted unanimously to select CH2M Hill as their recommendation to the Tigard City Council with EES being their second choice. Staff is recommending that the Council follow the recommendation of the Intergovernmental Water Board and award the Contract for the Rate Study to the firm of CH2M Hill. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Award contract to another firm. FISCAL NOTES The 1995/96 budget includes $25,000 for the water rate study. Work on this project will begin in .July, 1995. 1l 11 A 10 mia AGENDA ITEM # 3. d . For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Bid award for construction of the Bonita Road Widening Protect PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Award to low bidder the contract for construction of the Bonita Road widening project and authorize the City Administrator to sign the contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION - Award the project to the low bidder, Berning Construction. INFORMATION SUMMARY On May 23rd three bids were opened for the Bonita Road Widening project. The tr .ct involves the widening of Bonita Road from 72nd to the railroad acks, modifying the traffic signal at 72nd and widening the Fanno Creek idge. The low bidder is a local contractor capable of coordinating the project and performing the work satisfactorily. The low bid exceeded the consultant's estimate for the traffic signal and bridge widening work by $81,000. The degree of difficulty of the project and the variety of work limited the number of contractors interested in bidding therefore increasing the cost of the project. Rejecting the bids and readvertising the project most likely would not result in lower bids. The bids are as follows: Contractor Roadway Signal Bridge Total Berning Const., Wilsonville $379,422 $74,200 $285,408 $739,030 W.G. Moe & Sons, Portland $448,371 $77,500 $259,578 $785,449 Gelco Corp., Salem $481,271 $67,470 $286,562 $835,303 Engineer/Consultant Estimates $382,404 $63,000 $215,693 $661;097 OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The project is funded in the 1994/95 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) from the Traffic Impact Fees and Gas Tax. There are adequate funds in the project, timates to cover,the project as bid. bon-awrd.ss AGENDA ITEM # 3• For Agenda of June 13, 19995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Bid award for construction of the Bull Mountain Road Shoulder Improvements PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK Z~ZrZFI CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Award to low bidder the contract for construction of the Bull Mountain Road Shoulder Improvements and authorize the City Administrator to sign the contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award the project to the low bidder, Casper & Magera Incorporated. INFORMATION SUMMARY n May 23rd six bids were opened for the Bull Mountain Road Shoulder provement project. The project involves widening the north side of Bull. Mountain Road from 150th Avenue to Roshak Road. The low bidder is a medium sized contractor capable of performing the work satisfactorily. The low bid exceeded the engineer's estimate by $2,600. The bids are as follows: Casper & Magera, Spokane $62,588 Morse Bros, Sherwood $71,216 Michael Mark, Ltd., Tigard $72,416 Benge Const., Tualatin $79,929 Kerr Contractors, Tualatin $82,589 Marshall Assoc, Tualatin $93,921 Engineer's Estimate $60,000 OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The project is funded from the funds remaining from last years MSTIP II Bull Mountain Road Shoulder Improvements Project. ga\bull-awd.ss !I Mi;IJIM: AGENDA ITEM # 3 • 5 For Agenda of June _13. 1995 r CITY O..F` ~ TIGam.R.,D, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award of contract for construction of the Shady Lane Storm Drainage CIP PREPARED BY: DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK - ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for construction of the Shady Lane Storm Drainage CIP. - STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, reject all bids and authorize staff to again advertise for bids later in the year. - INFORMATION SUMMARY n May 30, 1995, bids were opened as follows: Marshall Associated Contractors, Inc., Tualatin, OR $ 63,721.00 CJ's Construction, Inc., Kent WA $ 76,837.13 Engineer's Estimate $ 45,000.00 The purpose of the project is to replace a substandard storm drain along the north side of SW Shady lane, east of Greenburg Road, to eliminate frequent street flooding. Rejection of bids is recommended because of the limited number received and the prices substantially exceed the engineer's estimate without explanation. Staff anticipates that more competitive bids will be received for this particular project by advertising again later in the season. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The project was added to the 1994/95 Capital Improvement Program by Council on September 27, 1994 with a budget of $52,000. *J/GB;IShadyLane.SS ` AGENDA ITEM # 3, _5 Q ' SIM For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Purchase LED Retrofit Kits for Traffic Signals PREPARED BY; G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Authorize purchase of LED Retrofit kits for the City's 11 traffic signals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the purchase and authorize the City Administrator to sign the Purchase Order. INFORMATION SUMMARY New technology has provided LED lights to replace the red ball and pedestrian hand traffic signal lights. The cost to retrofit our red balls and edestrian hand symbols is $20,475. A traffic signal retrofitted with the _d LED lights consume 40% of the energy of a standard traffic signal. This equates to an annual energy savings of approximately $7,000 for Tigard. The LED lights also last 10 times longer than the standard incandescent lights and do not go totally out but fade with time. This will decrease the required maintenance substantially and provide a safer signal. Installation of the LED retrofit kits will be performed by Washington County as part of their periodic maintenance of our signals. We have applied for and will receive a rebate from PGE in the amount of $5,700 to install the energy saving devices. We will also be evaluating the feasibility of modifying our 'DONT WALK' pedestrian signals to the hand symbol. If this is not too expensive we will retrofit these also. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The retrofitting will be funded from the Signal Repair and Maintenance budget. \traf-led.ss i MEN= Eli: tom AGENDA ITEM # ✓ h' For Agenda of June. 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Bid Award for Main Street Pavement Reconstruction Protect PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Award of the bid for the Main Street Reconstruction project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award the bid to the low bidder, Eagle-Elsner, and authorize the City Administrator to sign the documents. INFORMATION SUMMARY On June 6th, five bids were opened for the Main Street Reconstruction W roject. The project consists of reconstructing the pavement and storm drain stem from the Fanno Creek bridge to Scoffins Street. The widening of the Burnham Street intersection is also included in this project. We expect that by the end of June we will have obtained authority through the courts to remove the tavern. The low bidder has performed work for several Tigard projects and is capable of performing the work. The bids are as follows: Eagle-Elsner, Tigard $378,675.59 Morse Brothers, Beaverton $419,000.00 Porter Yett Co., Portland $436,845.25 Kerr Contractors, Tualatin $511,722.50 Casper Magera, Spokane $555,561.00 The Engineer's estimate was $500,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The Main Street Pavement Reconstruction project and the Burnham Street widening are funded from the 1994/95 and 1995/96 Streets and Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Program. \main-awd.ss i Ban= I 7AW AGENDA ITEM # 3.5 For Agenda of June 13. 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON _ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Bid Award for Grant Avenue Sidewalk PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Award of the bid for the Grant Avenue Sidewalk project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award the bid to the low bidder, D & D Concrete, and authorize the City Administrator to sign the documents. INFORMATION SUMMARY On June 6th, two bids were opened for the Grant Avenue Sidewalk project. The project consists of constructing a sidewalk on the east side of Grant Avenue, ver the existing bikepath, and improving the storm drain system. An overlay s also been included from Walnut to the school due to the condition of the pavement. The low bidder has constructed other projects in Tigard and is capable of performing the work. The bids are as follows: D & D Concrete, Tualatin $103,080.00 Kerr Contractor's, Tualatin $118,831.00 The Engineer's estimate was $80,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The Grant Avenue Sidewalk project is funded from -the 1994/95 Capital Improvement Program and from a CDBG grant. Although the low bid exceeds the Engineer's estimate there are adequate funds to proceed with this project. The savings from the Main Street project will cover the relatively small cost overrun of this project. \grantawd.ss J; 1 101:11 affln AGENDA ITEM n y For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Election and Certification for the receipt of State Revenues PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK WIV? CITY ADMIN OK i ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the City Council certify that it is qualified to receive state shared revenues and declare its election to receive state revenues? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the declaration and certification be made by approval of the attached ordinance and resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY The 1995/96 Budget includes estimates of state revenues as follows: State Revenue Sharing $ 196,600 Liquor Tax 254,000 Cigarette Tax 92,000 Gas Tax 1,546,000 Total State Revenues $ 2,088,600 In order to receive the state revenue sharing funds, the City must hold a public hearing before the budget committee and before the City Council on the use of such funds. Revenue sharing funds are a resource to the general fund and are used to fund Police operations. The attached ordinance certifies that the required hearings were held and that the City is electing to receive such revenues. In order to receive the other state revenues, the City must certify that it provides four or more required services from a list of municipal services. The City provides six such services. The attached resolution certifies that the required services are provided. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None FISCAL NOTES State revenues account for 5.7 percent of current general fund revenues. State gas tax, accounts for the majority of street maintenance and street lighting funding in addition to a significant part of the street capital improvement program funding. r 7Aftwomm CITY OF TIGP.RD, OREGON ® RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR STATE SHARED REVENUES WHEREAS, ORS 221.760(1) provides as follows: The officer responsible for disbursing funds to cities under ORS 323.455, 366.785 to 366.820, and 471.805 shall,, in the case of a city located within a county having more than 100,000 inhabitants according to the most recent Federal Decennial Census, disburse such funds only if the City provides four or more of the following municipal services: (1) Police Protection (2) Fire Protection (3) Street Construction, Maintenance and Lighting (4) Sanitary Sewers (5) Storm Sewers (6) Planning, Zoning, and Subdivision Control (7) One or More Utility Services; and WHEREAS, City officials recognize the desirability of assisting the State Officer responsible for determining the eligibility of cities to receive such funds in accordance with ORS 221.760. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The City of Tigard hereby certifies that it provides the following four or more services enumerated in Section 1, ORS 221.760: (1) Police Protection (2) Street Construction, Maintenance and Lighting (3) Sanitary Sewers (4) Storm Sewers (5) Planning, Zoning, and Subdivision Control (6) Water Utility PASSED: This day of , 1995. ATTEST Mayor - City of Tigard : City- Recorder - City-of Tigard I 7Aft CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Pursuant to ORS 221.770, the City hereby elects to receive state revenues for fiscal year 1995-96. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1995. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder Aft APPROVED: This q day of , 1995. Mayor - City Of Tigard Approved as to form: City Attorney Date I certify that, a public hearing before the Budget Committee was held April 20, 1995, and a public hearing before the City Council was held on June 13, 1995, giving citizens an opportunity to comment on use of State Revenue Sharing. n Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder Date. MEMO IS I Milli a pi AGENDA ITEM ✓ For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Adoption of 1995/96 Budciet PREPARED BY: Wayne DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK V V A,- a=xv=ca===c==acc=====ca===c==ccccc====c_c-ac ==a=s=cco=====xcc=caaaca==mccaa ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Local budget law requires that a budget for the ensuing fiscal year be adopted prior to July 1 by the governing body, after approval by the Budget Committee and after a public hearing has been held before the City Council. ==cc=acx=c==xc=c===c==cc===a=cc=====oa==cc==_..__=====ac==cc=xv=========aa==== STAFF RECOMMENDATION a Staff recommends approval of Resolution per Budget Committee recommendation as amended by City Council. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard Budget Committee reviewed the 1995/9; Proposed Budget as submitted by the Budget Officer. The Budget Committee completed their review on may 18, 1995 with approval of the budget as amended by the committee, in the total amount of $37,383,816. The committee's changes to the proposed budget are reflected in Exhibit "A" of the attached resolution. Local budget law gives the governing body the authority to make certain changes to the Budget ommittee recommendation prior to adoption of the budget. The Council may adjust budget esources up or down and may increase or decrease expenditures. Increases in expenditures -ora liraited to 10% of the published total in each fund. One change to the approved Budget is being proposed for City Council Approval. The City Council at their May 23, 1995 meeting authorized the Human Resources Director to move ahead with a Classification and compensation review. The review is estimated to cost $30,000 which was not anticipated in the approved budget and therefore requires that the budget be adjusted by the council to reflect this change. This change is within Council's authority. The Budget Committee recommended 1995/96 budget with the above change is reflected in Resolution option number 1. The Council has expressed its desire to provide funding for a Music in the Park pilot program for this summer. In addition, some have discussed possible funding for the purchase of the Feed Store on Main street. These two additional changes are also within the Council's authority. We have developed Resolution Option number 2 which includes Option 1 changes and $5,000 for Music in the Park and $70,000 for the Feed Store. Resolution Option number 2 is included for Council consideration. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED - 1. Adopt Resolution per Budget Committee recommendation as amended by the Council as either Option 1 or 2. 2. Make other changes within City Council's authority, then adopt Resolution. FISCAL NOTES 1. Option -1 provides appropriations of $37,405,701, Option 2 provides appropriations of $37,480,701. Both options Levy taxes in the amount of $6,074,433 111110:5110§51 111 I'AM O-~~sn d CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ption i RESOLUTION NO. 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96. Whereas, the budget for the City of Tigard for the year beginning July 1, 1995 was duly approved and recommended to the City Council by the regularly constituted budget committee at its meeting on the May 18, 1995, after proceedings in accordance with Chapter 294, Oregon Revised Statutes; and Whereas a summary of the budget document as required by Chapter 294.416 was duly published in the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City in accordance with Chapter 294.421; and Whereas a hearing by the Tigard City Council on the budget document, as approved by the budget committee, was duly called and held on June 13, 1995, whereat all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to appear and be heard with respect to the budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The Council adopts the budget for 1995/96 in the total sum of $37,405,701. Section 2: The Council adopts and hereby incorporates by reference in this resolution the following: * 1994-96 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Police Officer's Association dated July 1, 1994. * 1992-95 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Municipal Employee's Ossociation(OPEU) dated November 4, 1992 which was extended through December 31, 1995. * 1995/96 Salary/Job Classification pay plan for non-union employees as set forth in the 1995/96 budget including a 3.0 percent cost of living adjustment effective July 1, 13:5 (3.3 percent last year). Section 3: The appropriations for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1995 are approved as shown in the attached Exhibit A. Section 4: The City of Tigard City Council hereby levies the taxes provided for in the budget in the amount of $6,074,433 and that these taxes are hereby levied upon all taxable property within the district as of July 1, 1995. The following allocation and categorization subject to the limits of section llb, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution constitute the above aggregate levy: Subject to General Excluded from Government Limitation the Limitation General Tax Base 4,526,835 G/O Debt Service 1,439,395 Water G/O Debt Service 108,203 Category Total 4,526,835 1,547,598 Total Levy 6,074,433 i Passed this 13th day of June, 1995 ttest: Mayor - City Of Tigard City Recorder - City of Tigard Mimi City Of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 95-_ Exhibit "A" Budget Committee Council Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted General Community Services 6,398,891 4,900 6,403,791 6,403,791 Maintenance Services 266,376 266,376 266,376 Development Services 1,802,437 1,802,437 1,802,437 Policy & Administration 1,373,236. 1,373,236 19,035 1,392,271 Non Departmental 264,180 264,180 264,180 Capital Improvements 61,300 100,000 161,300 161,300 Contingency 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total 10, 466, 420 104,900 10, 571, 320 19,035 10, 590, 355 Electrical Insp Development Services 119,578 119,578 119,578 Policy & Administration 14,475 14,475 300 14,775 Non Departmental 2,185 2,185 2,185 136,238 0 136,238 300 136,538 Sanitary Maintenance Services 463,619 463,619 463,619 Development Services 68,262 68,262 68,262 Policy & Administration 386,885 386,885 3,000 389,885 Non Departmental 56,760 56,760 56,760 Capital Improvements 2,517,835 2,517,835 2,517,835 Contingency 200,000 200,000 (3,000) 197,000 Total 3,693,361 3,693,361 3,693,361 Storm Maintenance Services 476,711 476,711 476,711 Development Services 68,262 68,262 68,262 Policy & Administration 174,914 174,914 1,500 176,414 Non Departmental 21,848 21,848 21,848 Capital Improvements 1,034,625 1,034,625 1,034,625 Contingency 100,000 100,000 (1,500) 98;500 Total 1,876,360 1,876,360 1,876,360 Water Maintenance Services 3,327,426 3,327,426 3,327,426 Development Services 40,141 40,141 40,141 Policy & Administration 229,103 229,103 2,550 231,653 Non Departmental 48,065 48,065 48,065 Capital Improvements 639,962 639,962 639,962 Contingency 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total 4,584,697 4,584,697 2,550 4,587,247 Crim Forfeiture Community Services 37,000 37,000 37,000 Resolution 95- Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 3 City Of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 95- Exhibit "A" Budget Committee Council _ Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted State Gas Tax Maintenance Services 562,545 562,545 562,545 Development Services 404,187 404,187 404,187- Policy & Administration 140,224 140,224 3,000 143,224 Non Departmental 34,956 34,956 34,956 Capital Improvements 845,289 845,289 845,289 Contingency 50,000 50,000 (3,000_) 47,000 Total 2,037,201 2,037,201 2,037,201 County Gas Tax Maintenance Services 121,361 121,361 121,361 Policy & Administration 42,094 42,094 615 42,709 Non Departmental 8,957 8,957 8,957 Capital Improvements 0 0 0 Contingency 2,588 2,588 (615) 1,973 Total 175,000 175,000 0 175,000 Traffic Impact Fee Development Services 71,979 71,979 71,979 Capital Improvements 2,192,021 2,192,021 2,192,021 Contingency 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total 2,414,000 2,414,000 0 2,414,000 Parks SDC Capital Improvements 633,000 633,000 633,000 Contingency 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total 693,000 693,000 0 693,000 Underground Utility Capital Improvements 94,500 94,500 94,500 Water Quality Capital Improvements 156,000 156,000 156,000 ` Water SDC Capital Improvements 2,074,485 2,074,485 2,074,485 Contingency 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,274,485 0 2,274,485 0 2,274,485 G/O Debt Debt Service 1,685,363 1,685,363 1,685,363 Bancroft Debt Service 3,637,840 3,637,840 3,637,840 Resolution 95- Exhibit "A" Page 2of3 Emil j I ME City Of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 95-- Exhibit "A" Budget Committee Council Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted Escrow D/S Debt Service 1,715,651 1,715,651 1,715,651 Bull Mtn CIP Capital Improvements 82,000 82,000 82,000 LID CIP Capital Improvements 670,000 670,000 670,000 Water CIP Reserve Capital Improvements 685,000 685,000 685,000 Park Levy CIP Capital Improvements 58,800 58,800 58,800 Facility Fund Capital Improvements 0 106,000 106,000 106,000 0 Total Appropriations 37,172,916 210,900 37,383,816 21,885 37,405,701 i' Resolution 95- Exhibit "A" Page 3 of 3 Option 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION No. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 310.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96. Whereas, the budget for the City of Tigard for the year beginning July 1, 1995 was duly approved and recommended to the City Council by the regularly constituted budget committee at its meeting on the May 18, 1995, after proceedings in accordance with Chapter 294, Oregon Revised Statutes; and Whereas a summary of the budget document as required by Chapter 294.416 was duly published in the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City in accordance with Chapter 294.421; and Whereas a hearing by the Tigard City Council on the budget document, as approved by the budget committee, was duly called and held on June 13, 1995, whereat all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to appear and be heard with respect to the budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1_ The Council adopts the budget for 1995/96 in the total sum of $37,480,7001. Section 2: The Council adopts and hereby incorporates by reference in this resolution the following: * 1994-96 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Police Officer's Association dated July 1, 1994. A* 1992-95 Agreement between the City of Tigard and Tigard Municipal Employee's sociation(OPEU) dated November 4, 1992 which was extended through December 31, 1995. * 1995/96 Salary/Job Classification pay plan for non-union employees as set forth in the 1995/96 budget including a 3.0 percent: cost of living adjustment effective July 1, 1995 (3.3 percent last year). Section 3: The appropriations for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1995 are approved as shown in the attached Exhibit A. Section 4: The City of Tigard City Council hereby levies the taxes provided for in the budget in the amount of $6,074,433 and that these taxes are hereby levied upon all taxable property within the district as of July 1, 1995. The following allocation and categorization subject to the limits of section 11b, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution constitute the above aggregate levy: Subject to General Excluded from Government Limitation the Limitation General Tax Base 4,526,835 G/O Debt Service 1,439,395 Water G/O Debt Service 108,203 Category Total 4,526,835 1,547,598 Total Levy 6,074,433 _ Passed..this 13th day of June, 1995 Attest:' _a - Mayor - City Of Tigard . City Recorder City of Tigard V s City Of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 95- Exhibit "A" Budget Committee Council Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted General Community Services 6,398,891 4,900 6,403,791 5,000 6,408,791 Maintenance Services 266,376 266,376 266,576 Development Services 1,802,437 1,802,437 1,802,437 Policy & Administration 1,373,236 1,373,236 19,035 1,392,271 Non Departmental 264,180 264,180 264,180 Capital Improvements 61,300 100,000 161,300 70,000 231,300 Contingency 300,000 300,000 0 300,000 Total 10,466, 420 104,900 10, 571, 320 94,035 10, 665, 355 Electrical Insp Development Services 119,578 119,578 119,578 Policy & Administration 14,475 14,475 300 14,775 Non Departmental 2,185 2,185 2,185 136,238 0 136,238 300 136,538 Sanitary Maintenance Services 463,619 463,619 463,619 Development Services 68,262 68,262 68,262 Policy & Administration 386,885 386,885 3,000 389,885 Non Departmental 56,760 56,760 56,760 Capital Improvements 2,517,835 2,517,835 2,517,835 Contingency 200,000 200,000 (3,000) 197,000 361 Total 3,693,361 3,693,361 3,693, Storm Maintenance Services 476,711 476,711 476,711 Development Services 68,262 68,262 68,262 Policy & Administration 174,914 174,914 1,500 176,414 Non Departmental 21,848 21,848 21,848 Capital Improvements 1,034,625 1,034,625 1,034,625 Contingency 100,000 100,000 (1,500) 98,500 360 Total 1,876,360 1,876,360 1,876, Water Maintenance Services 3,327,426 3,327,426 3,327,426 Development Services 40,141 40,141 40,141 Policy & Administration 229,103 229,103 2,550 231,653 Non Departmental 48,065 48,065 48,065 Capital Improvements 639,962 639,962 639,962 Contingency 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total 4,584,697 4,584,697 2,550 4,587,247 Crim Forfeiture Community Services 37,000 37,000 37,000 Resolution 95- Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 3 City Of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 95- Exhibit "A" lrMli, Budget Committee Council Fund Program Proposed Changes Approves! Changes Adopted State Gas Tax Maintenance Services 562,545 562,545 562,545 Development Services 404,187 404,187 404,187 Policy & Administration 140,224 140,224 3,000 143.224 Non Departmental 34,956 34,956 34,956 Capital Improvements 845,289 845,289 845.289 Contingency 50,000 50,000 (3,000) 47,000 Total 2,037,201 2,037,201 2, 037, 201 County Gas Tax Maintenance Services 121,361 121,361 121,361 Policy & Administration 42,094 42,094 615 42,709 Non Departmental 8,957 8,957 8,957 Capital Improvements 0 0 0 Contingency, 2,588 2,588 (615) 1,973 Total 175,000 175,000 0 175,000 Traffic Impact Fee Development Services 71,979 71,979 71,979 Capital Improvements 2,192,021 2,192,021 2,192,021 Contingency 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total 2,414,000 2,414,000 0 2,414,000 Parks SDC Capital Improvements 633,000 633,000 633.000 Contingency 60,000 60,000 60,000 Total 693,000 693,000 0 693,000 Underground Utility Capital Improvements 94,500 94,500 94.500 Water Quality Capital Improvements 156,000 156,000 156,000 Water SDC Capital Improvements 2,074,485 2,074,485 2,074.485 Contingency 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,274,485 0 2,274,485 0 2,274,485 G/O Debt Debt Service 1,685,363 1,685,363 1,685,363 Bancroft Debt Service 3,637,840 3,637,840 3,637,840 Resolution 95- Exhibit "A" Page 2of3 , Rmz= City Of Tigard, Oregon Resolution No. 95- Exhibit "A" Budget Committee Council Fund Program Proposed Changes Approved Changes Adopted Escrow D/S Debt Service 1,715,651 1,715,651 1,715,651 Bull Mtn CIP Capital Improvements 82,000 82,000 82.000 LID CIP Capital Improvements 670,000 670,000 670,000 Water CIP Reserve Capital Improvements 6851000 685,000 685,000 Park Levy CIP Capital Improvements 58,800 58,800 58,800 Facility Fund Capital Improvements 0 106,000 106,000 106,000 Total Appropriations 37.172,916 210.900 37,383,816 96.885 37.480.701 Resolution 95- Exhibit "A" Page 3of3. JUN 13 1995 f (~,.?~i n vrLv COUINCIL MAL e s :ers'w i +ai? to 23J School Dist. to confirm Sept. 10 parking. c~ B June 13, 1995 ' City Council, June 13, 1995 I signed up on the two minute agenda not knowing if Council will open Music In The Park agend discussion to those wishing to speak? I'd like to have Council accept input from the audience present who wish to participate in Music In The Park concept and the construction of a stage that will prove cost effective once constructed by community volunteer help and donations. Community support has been overwhelming for the concept of Music In Me Park especially for City of Tigard's 34th birthday celebration. Volunteers in this commuity event have been forthcoming and fiscally speaking asking for a constructed stage to be used by users who can be charged users fees for the use of a stage. City of Tigard is just completing a covered roof picnic area again having users fees. A constructed stage using volunteer help will be built for the same price the city in the past has paid for a 3 day Tigard Country Daze renter: It's prudent to look at a capital improvement project for the benefit of the entire comet nit; who will make use of this facility. Music In The Park Committee wish to be assured money is appropriated for a sonstructed stage so that we cau go forward to make it a successful community event. A yes or no vote tonite will either encourage volunteers or discourage thei as the Committee has offered labor and any other help to conclude this Option B. A decision to fund a rental will only terminate the community interest in the years to come as the cost effectivdness tonight is the reality of the City owning a capital improvement for the benefit of the community. If one on the Council comes up with "next summer" you are locked into the same budget so the rental or free use of a stage this year becomes another handicap and would have to be expedited just as this Music In The Park Committee tonite has presented the most cost effective method for the public use. I'm sure no Committee -member will wish to pursue this application in the future without the support of this Council tonite. Tile are proposing long term com;aitment i.e. next • 's 3 th irthday party and all other* ctivities the community wishes to use in all our Ca par s. .C. 333 ~~J.a..I June 13, 1995 Dear Supt. of 23J Tigard High School: Russ Joki tic. to you a proposal going before the City of Tigard Council tonite. It is hoped that on Sept. 10 we may, if needed, make use of the Tigard High School parking area? We plan to ask the First Christian Church to provide a shuttle bus to and from this event. We have no way of knowing in advance as to traffic and what to expect in parking arrangements. The neighbors on Riverwood Lane feel once the public is aware that there is a public access that they will be inundated by parking care for events held at Cook Park. Atypical of building sites near and around Tigard High School and Cook Park. Our publicity Chairman Helen Mason lives on Riverwood Lane and looks forward to hearing music while sitting outdoors on her porch so all is not negative. Note enc. presentation being made on Council level tonite. It's hard to firm up planning until it becomes 'official'. Hopefully your school parking lot will be available for this pa;c-;cular event if _the need arises. Seems like it's best to plan ahead even tho Council is still mulling over Music In The Park concept. Sincerely, ter,. ~.~,.~/2.c-.++* •C• 333 FAAM k MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Interested parties ~ FROM: Randy Wooley, City Enginee vF (J DATE: June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Update Attached is a copy of the capital improvement program (CIP) update adopted by the City Council on June 13, 1995. The CIP is a schedule of project funding for streets, parks and utilities. The projects shown for FY 1995-96 are funded and authorized. Work on these projects is proceeding. Projects shown for the subsequent fiscal years are only a tentative schedule. The CIP is reviewed each year as part of the budget process. During the annual review, projects may be added or deleted by the Council. Project schedules in future years may change. For additional information on specific projects, contact the Engineering Department at. 639-4171. main STREET PROJECTS C.I.P. A 'k OTHER FUNDING PROTECT TT;' GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1995-96 Committed projects 1,238,000 762,000 TIF transit reserve 87,000 79th/Durham traffic signal 43,289 School Dist. 79th Ave. preliminary design 10,000 130th/Winterlake connection -const. 500,000 Speed bump program 30,000 Walnut/Tiedeman intersection 0 County TIF reserve 367,021 Totals for FY 1995-96 2,192,021 845,289 FY 1996-97 TIF Transit reserve 89,000 Major maintenance 190,631 Alfred St. paving 30,000 74th Ave. paving (Bonita to Durham) 35,000 Main St. pavement replacement 300,000 Storm drain (Scoffins to 99W and Fanno Creek to 99W) fund Greenburg Road r/w 200,000 Greenburg/Mapleleaf intersection 250,000 TIF reserve 419,702 Totals for FY 1996-97 958,702 555,631 FY 1997-98 TIF transit reserve 70,000 Major maintenance 300,000 79th-Avenue 106,906 LID Ped. improvements - Park/Watkins 160,000 Bonita railroad crossing 400,000 TIF reserve 341,933 Totals for FY 1997-98 811,933 566,906 FY 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 1 U%Ki STREET PROJECTS C.I.P. (continued) OTHER FUNDING PROJECT TIF GAS TAX SOURCE TIF transit reserve 54,000 Major Maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Burnham/Main Signal 40,000 80,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 148,084 (design & r/w) TIF reserve 538,675 Totals for FY 1998-99 632,675 578,084 r FY 1999-2000 TIF transit reserve 45,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 239,135 TIF reserve 482,509 Totals for FY 1999-00 527,509 589,135 FY 2000-01 TIF transit reserve 35,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 200,000 Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins (design) 50,023 TIF reserve 373,135 Totals for FY 2000-01 408,135 600,023 FY 2001-02 TIF transit reserve 40,000 TIF reserve 373,541 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins 260,714 413,541 610,714 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 2 MEIN, I PARKS C.I.P. PROJECTS PARK LEVY SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 17,000 524,000 Englewood--Fanno Creek park connection 100,000 Terrace Trail pathway 43,,,800 10,000 Summerlake Park fencing 4,000 Totals for FY 1995-96 58,800 638,000 FY 1996-97 Woodard-Main park connection 285,000 prop. acquisition & improvements Total for FY 1996-97 285,000 FY 1997-98 Woodard - Main park connection 120,000 Ash Ave - Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 New community park - identify site/master plan 62,000 Total for FY 1997-98 212,000 FY 1998-99 Englewood Park basketball court 15,000 Fanno Creek park trail lighting 40,000 New Community park - prop. acquisition 105,000 Total for FY 1998-99 160,000 FY 1999-2000 New community park - prop. acquisition 131,000 Total for 1999-2000 131,000 FY 2000-01 New community park - property acquisition 100,000 Total for 2000-01 100,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 3 PARZS C.T.P. (continued) Alk FY 2001-02 New community park - property acquisition 102,000 Total for 2001-02 102,000 An- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 4 SANITARY g et C . I . P . UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 20,000 10,000 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 589,500 1,388,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. program 425,335 Milton Ct. sewer xing protection 30,000 Utility Mapping 25,000 530,335 599,500 1,388,000 FY 1996-97 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 349,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 88,734 118,734 349,000 FY 1997-98 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 278,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 94,216 124,216 278,000 FY 1998-99 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 225,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 99,269 129,269 225,000 FY 1999-2000 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrade 187,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 103;920 133,920 187,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 5' E Mli Ali; Jil; AIM SANITARY szw= C . I . P . (continued) FY 2000-01 - Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve capacity upgrades 142,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 109,776 139,776 142,000 FY 2001-02 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve capacity upgrades 100,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. grog. 160,197 190,197 100,000 3CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 6 STORM DRAINAGE C.I.P. 71 Ash UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NE:: SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 80,000 82,000 200,000 Ash/Scoffi,ns storm drain 50,000 111th Place storm drain 55,000 Reserve for USA master plan 49,000 518,446 80,000 236,000 718,446 FY 1996-97 Reserve for USA master plan 146,997 -0- 146,997 FY 1997-98 Reserve for USA master plan 108,155 -0- 108,155 FY 1998-99 Reserve for USA master plan 78,534 -0- 78,534 FY 1999-2000 Reserve for USA master plan 61,493 -0- 61,493 FY 2000-01 Reserve for USA master plan 43,311 -0- 43,311 FY 2000-01 Reserve for USA master plan 43,895 -0- 43,895 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 7 I WATER SYSTEM C.I.P. WATER FUND FY 1995-96 Committed projects 50,000 North Dakota St. pipeline extension 70,000 Scholls Ferry.Rd. pipeline extension 40,000 Pleasant View pressure reducing station 20,000 Highway 217 crossing replacement 270,000 Utility Mapping 25,000 Reserve 164,962 639,962 FY 1996-97 Reserve 388,388 388,388 FY 1997-98 Reserve 359,325 359,325 FY 1998-99 Reserve 327,819 327,819 FY 1999-2000 Reserve 293,733 293,733 FY 2000-2001 I Reserve 256,925 256,925 FY 2000-2001 Reserve 217,249 217,249 :w/CIP-LST.95 ` CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Adopted 6/13/95) Page 8 1 1-GENDA ITEM # _ For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIG.ARD, OREGON COUNCIL s TiVt~ty ✓n1ENDczITEM SUMIIA Y VV V1V lr1 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Capital Improvement Program Update PREPARED BY: R. Wooley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE.; THE COUNCIL Approval of the annual update to the capital improvement program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By motion, approve the updated capital improvement program as shown in Exhibit A. This action will allocate the amounts shown to the various projects in FY 1995-96. The amounts shown for future years will be considered tentative and subject to review during next year's CIP update. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Planning Commission has reviewed the first annual update of the capital provement program (CIP). Exhibit B is the staff report and staff commendation to the Planning Commission. Exhibit A is the revised CIP update containing the recommendations of Planning Commission and staff. The Planning Commission heard testimony from a number of citizens. Some of the testimony supported the staff recommendations (Attachment #1 to Exhibit B). Others suggested revisions to the staff recommendation. At the conclusion of the public testimony, the Planning Commission discussion focused on the following projects: 130th/Winterlake: The primary item of citizen testimony and Commission discussion was construction funding for the 130th/Winterlake connection. After considerable discussion, the Commission voted 6-1 to recommend funding for the project. Walnut/Tiedeman intersection: The Commission agreed with the West CIT that improvements to the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection should be a high priority. However, they also agreed with the past City policy of not using City funds for projects outside the city limits. Therefore, the Commission recommended that the project be included in the list of FY 1995-96 projects but with an allocation of $0 and a note that funding should come from the county. Exhibit A reflects this recommendation. Terrace Trails pathway: The funding shown is staff's estimate of the cost to construct a soft path between 115th and 118th. The Commission expressed the desire to also see soft pathways connecting the main pathway with Terrace Trails Drive and Fairview Lane. However, the Commission was not willing to reduce funding on other projects in order v to provide additional funding for the Terrace Trails project. Therefore, they recommended that any funds remaining after completion of the main pathway be used for side pathway connections to the adjoining streets. If no funding is available, the need for connecting pathways will be reviewed again next year as part of the CIP update. A map showing the proposed pathway is included in Exhibit C. The Planning Commission approved the sanitary sewer and storm drainage CIPs without discussion. However, since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has discovered the following items which were unintentionally omitted from the staff report to the Planning Commission. Staff requests the following changes, which are all included in Exhibit A: Milton Court sewer crossing protection: This project involves protection for an existing sanitary sewer siphon line under Fanno Creek. Erosion of the creek has partially exposed the pipe, creating the potential for the pipe to be damaged by winter storms. The project to provide protection for the pipe has an estimated cost of $30,000. Staff is asking that this project be added to the FY 1995-96 sani~ary sewer CIP. Funding of $30,000 would be from the unrestricted sewer fund. To compensate, funding for the neighborhood sewer extension program would be reduced to $425,335. Storm drainage committed protects: The committed projects in the storm drainage old SDC fund includes a project to replace the existing Walnut Street culvert near 123rd Avenue. This project was added to last year's CIP because it was anticipated that the existing culvert would become a City maintenance problem. In this year's staff recommendation, this project should have been removed from the CIP for two reasons. First, the culvert is in the Walnut Island area and remains a County responsibility. Second, it is in the portion of Walnut Street that will be improved under the MSTIP-3 program approved by the voters in May. We now expect that the culvert will be replaced as part of the street project. Therefore, Exhibit A shows a reduced amount in the Old SDC Committed Projects. Ash/Scoffins storm drainage: Construction of the new American Legion building has brought to our attention an old problem of storm drainage in the area of Ash Avenue and Scoffins Street. The existing drainage system in the area is poorly designed. Much of the drainage from Scoffins Street and adjoining properties discharges across the apartment development to the south. The Legion project will make some improvements but has no satisfactory location to discharge. The proposed CIP project will construct a new storm drain line in Ash Avenue and replace a section of existing undersized line at Commercial Street. Staff recommends fund of $50,000 under the storm drainage old SDC fund. 111th Place storm drainage: Past development projects have not adequately provided for storm drainage for the area west of 111th Place near Geneva Street. These past oversights are causing drainage problems for the homes on 111th Place. Staff recommends a project to construct a new storm drainage line to connect to the existing storm drain in 110th. The estirliated cost of $55,000 is to be funded form the storm LIM ----drainage old SDC fund. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED See Exhibit B. FISCAL NOTES Funding sources are identified in the CIP. The proposed expenditures in each fund match the amounts to be appropriated to. CIP in the FY 1995-96 budget recommended by the Budget Committee. rw/cip-sum EXHIBIT A RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT" PROGRAM UPDATE June 13, 1995 3iREET PROJECTS C.I.P. r - OTHER FUNDING PROJECT TIF GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1995-96 Committed projects 1,238,000 762,000 TIF transit reserve 87,000 79th Ave. preliminary design 10,000 130th Ave.(Hawk's Beard to Scholls) -construction 367,021 130th/Winterlake connection -const. 500,000 Speed bump program 30,000 79th/Durham traffic signal 43,289 School District Walnut/Tiedeman intersection 0 County Totals for FY 1995-96 2,192,021 845,289 FY 1996-97 TIF Transit reserve 89,000 Major maintenance 190,631 Alfred St. paving 30,000 74th Ave. paving (Bonita to Durham) 35,000 Main St. pavement replacement 300,000 Storm drain (Scoffins to 99W and Fanno Creek to 99W) fund Greenburg Road r/w 200,000 Greenburg/Mapleleaf intersection 250,000 TIF reserve 419,702 Totals for FY 1996-97 958,702 555,631 FY 1997-98 TIF transit reserve 70,000 Major maintenance 300,000 79th Avenue 106,906 LID Ped. improvements - Park/Watkins 160,000 Bonita railroad crossing 400,000 TIF reserve 341,933 Totals for FY 1997-98 811,933 566,906 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 1 JIM STREET PROJECTS C.I.F. (continued) I 7Adft OTHER FUNDING PROJECT TIF GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1998-99 TIF transit reserve 54,000 Major Maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Burnham/Main Signal 40,000 80,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 148,084 (design & r/w) TIF reserve 538,675 Totals for FY 1998-99 632,675 578,084 FY 1999-2000 TIF transit reserve 45,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 239,135 TIF reserve 482,509 Totals for FY 1999-00 527,509 589,135 FY 2000-01 TIF transit reserve 35,000 S Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 200,000 Hall./Hunziker/Scoffins (design) 50,023 TIF reserve 373,135 Totals for FY 2000-01 408,135 600,023 FY 2001-02 TIF transit reserve 40,000 TIF reserve 373,541 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins 260,714 413,541 610,714 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM! (6/13/95 Update) Page 2. PAPM C.I.P. PROJECTS PARK LEVY SDC FY 1995-96 ` Committed projects 17,000 524,000 Englewood-Fanno Creek park connection 100,000 Terrace Trail pathway 41,800 5,000 Summerlake Park fencing 4,000 Totals for FY 1995-96 58,800 633,000 FY 1996-97 Woodard-Main park connection 285,000 prop. acquisition & improvements Total for FY 1996-97 285,000 FY 1997•-98 Woodard - Main park connection 120,000 Ash Ave - Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 New community park - identify site/master plan 62,000 Total for FY 1997-98 212,000 FY 1998-99 Englewood Park basketball court 15,000 Fanno Creek park trail lighting 40,000 New Community park - prop. acquisition 105,000 Total for FY 1998-99 160,000 FY 1999-2000 New community park - prop. acquisition 131,000 Total for 1999-2000 131,000 FY 2000-01 New community park - property acquisition 100,000 Total fqr 2000-01 100,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 3 _ PAS C . I . P . (continued) FY 2001-02 New community park - property acquisition 102,000 Total for 2001-02 102,000 7 i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 4 11 NEI Rom "SANITARY SEWER C . I . P . UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 20;000 10,000 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 589,500 1,388,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. program 425,335 Milton Ct. sewer xing protection 30,000 Utility Mapping 25,000 530,335 599,500 1,388,000 FY 1996-97 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 349,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 88,734 118,734 349,000 FY 1997-98 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 278,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. grog. 94,216 124,216 278,000 FY 1998-99 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 225,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 99,269 F 129,269 225,000 FY 1999-2000 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrade 187,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 103,920 133,920 187,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 5 Fmmm Adi SANITARY SEWER C.I.P. (continued) FY 2000-01 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve capacity upgrades 142,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 109,776 139,776 142,000 FY 2001-02 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve capacity upgrades 100,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 160,197 190,197 100,000 I 1 I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 6 L STORM DRAINAGE C.I.P. UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NE-VV SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 80,000 82,000 200,000 Ash/Scoffins storm drain 50,000 111th Place storm drain 55,000 Reserve for USA master plan 49,000 518,446 80,000 236,000 715,446 FY 1996-97 Reserve for USA master plan 146,997 -0- 146,997 FY. 1997-98 Reserve for USA master plan 108,155 -0- 108,155 F's 1998-99 Reserve for USA master plan 78,534 -0- 78,534 FY 1999-2000 Reserve for USA master plan 61,493 -0- 61,493 FY 2000-01 Reserve for USA master plan 43,311 -0- 43,311 FY 2000-01 Aft Reserve for USA master plan 43,895 -0- 43,895 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 7 WATER SYSTEMS C. 1. P. Awl WATER FUND FY 1995-96 Committed projects 50,000 North Dakota St. pipeline extension 70,000 Scholls Ferry Rd. pipeline extension 40,000 Pleasant View pressure reducing station 20,000 Highway 217 crossing replacement 270,000 Utility Mapping 25,000 Reserve 164,962 639,962 FY 1996-97 Reserve 388,388 388,388 FY 1997-98 Reserve 359,325 359,325 FY 1998-99 Reserve 327,819 327,819 FY 1999-2000 Reserve 293,733 293,733 FY 2000-2001 Reserve 256,925 256,925 FY 2000-2001 Reserve 217,249 217,249 rw/CIP-LST.95 a MEN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (6/13/95 Update) Page 8 Wil 10 i Email= EXHIBIT B STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION lill:j 11 11,101 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Commission FROM: Randy Wooley, City Engineer Vim' DATE: May 15, 1995 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Update Background Last year the City adopted its first long-term capital improvement program (CIP) document. When the CIP was developed, it was intended that it would be reviewed and updated at least once a year. Recommendations on the first update are. now before the Planning Commission for review. Attachment #1 is the staff recommendation for the updated CIP for fiscal years 1995/96 through 2001/02. For comparison, Attachment .#2 is a copy of the CIP adopted last August by the City Council. Process During April and May, each CIT reviewed the CIP and suggested revisions. The CIT recommendations are contained in Attachment #3. The staff recommendation is based on the CIT input and other citizen input. The Planning .Commission meeting, while not a formal public hearing, is another opportunity for public input. The Commission should receive public comments. Following the public comment period, the Commission is asked to make a recommendation to the City Council. Final adoption of the CIP will be by the Council. Chancres Below is a brief discussion of the primary changes between the adopted CIP and the staff recommended CIP update. Staff will be available at the Planning Commission meeting to provide additional information if des_red. It is important to note that the various funding sources have restrictions on the types of projects eligible for funding. It is not always possible to switch projects between different funding sources. In general, we have tried to assign projects first to the most restrictive funding sources, leaving the less restrictive funding sources for other projects. In the past, it has generally been City policy not to use City funds for projects outside the city limits. In the adopted CIP, we violated this r"Olicy by including projects within the unincorporated "Walnut island" area. At the time of adoption of the CTP, it was anticipated that all islands would be annexed to MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISST_CN Page 1 the City in early 1995. We now know that this will not happen. Accordingly, in the proposed CIP update I' have eliminated all projects that are outside the City. Each account shows "Committed Projects" at the start of the new fiscal year. These are projects that we are working on currently that will extend into the new fiscal year. In general, these projects are already under contract or out to bid, but actual work will extend beyond the end of the fiscal year on June 30th. Attachment #4 provides a list of committed projects. Streets - TIF (Traffic Impact Fee) funding • Tiedeman Avenue bridge replacement: Council has accepted Federal and State grants for funding of this project. Therefore, it is now included in "Committed Projects". It is now shown under Storm Drainage because we expect to receive approval from the Unified Sewerage Agency to use storm drainage funds for the local match to the grants. The bridge replacement will improve flood capacity. • 130th/Winterlake oroiect: The West CIT recommended that this project not be funded. At the same time, the City Council received a petition from over 200 neighborhood residents asking that the project receive a high priority. Clearly, the neighborhood is still strongly divided over this issue. Last August, the Council heard testimony on this issue from both sides. Following that hearing, the Council voted (3-2 vote) to proceed with the project. On the basis of that Council direction, I have kept the project in the proposed CIP update. • Walnut/Tiedeman -oroiect: The West CIT also recommended that the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection project be given a high priority. However, this project falls almost entirely outside the current city limits. West of 106th Avenue, Walnut Street is largely outside the city limits and is still a county road. Therefore, as discussed above, this project is not shown in the proposed CIP update. If the Commission and Council were to change the past policy and consider funding of Walnut Street projects, then it might well be appropriate to move Walnut/Tiedeman to a higher priority. The other Walnut projects shown in the current CIP are scheduled for funding under the proposed County MSTIP-3 levy and may not need CIP funding. The results of MSTIP-3 vote should be known before the May 22nd Commission meeting. • TIF reserve: With the Walnut projects deleted, available TIF funding in future years exceeds the amount needed for the nominated projects that are eligible for TIF funding. I, have shown the unassigned funding as a TIF reserve. I recommend that this reserve be kept until the citywide transportation plan update is completed later this year. The TI-F- reserve can then be assigned to new projects next year based on the results of the updated plan. MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 The new transportation plan is likely to recommend a number o'f locations where TIF-eligible improvements will be needed. Over the next several years, I anticipate a need for substantial TIF funding in the Tigard Triangle area and elsewhere. Also, as additional areas of the Walnut Island area annex to the City, TIF funding will likely be needed for improvements on Walnut Street, 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street. Streets - aas tax funding Gas tax is the source of funding for most of our street and sidewalk improvements. Most of the projects nominated by the CIT groups are not eligible for TIF funds and would need to be funded from gas tax. However, the proposed FY 1995-96 City budget projects less gas tax funding available for CIP than was shown in last year's projections. As a result, it has been necessary to move the funding for some projects to later years. • Main Street: Earlier this year, the Council approved a revision to the phasing of the Main Street pavement reconstruction, at the suggestion of the Main Street merchants. The Council also approved the combining of the FY 1994-95 and FY 1995-96 work into one project to be constructed this summer. As a result, Main Street reconstruction between Scoffins Street and Fanno Creek bridge is included in the committed project list. The remainder of the work is now scheduled for FY 1996-97. • Malor maintenance: The major maintenance progra.n provides preservation of our existing street pavements through a program of pavement overlays and slurry seals. With earlier Council approval, we have combined the FY 1994-95 and FY 1995- 96 work into one contract, which is shown in the committed projects list. • Sneed bump oroaram: After review of the programs of Portland and other cities, the Council decided to initiate a trial program of speed bumps on selected residential streets. These bumps are a new design, less severe than those typically found in parking lots. The bumps give a gentle ride at 25 mph but a significant bump at higher speeds. Council asked each CIT to nominate a street for the trial program. 79th/Durham traffic sianal: Durham Road between Hall Boulevard and Upper Boones Ferry Road will be widened in 1996. There is neighborhood concern about operation of the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road and about safety of the crossing of Durham Road at Durham Elementary School. City Council asked us to explore funding to have a traffic signal installed at the 79th intersection in conjunction with the 1996 road improvements. Council explored with the School Board the possibility of partial funding from the School District if the school bond passes. In response, I have assigned all non-c mmitted gas tax funds ;n FY 1995-96 to 79th Avenue. MEMO TO PLAr1NING COMMISSION Page 3 • Alfred Street and 74th Avenue: Alfred Street and the portion of 74th Avenue south or Bonita Road are gravel roadways with a moderate amount of traffic. Both require substantial maintenance and are the source of frequent complaints. Paving these streets would result in a savings of over $13,000 per year in maintenance costs (grading and dust control). So, paving will pay for itself in only five years. Because of the substantial long-term benefits, I am recommending funding of these two projects at the first opportunity, which is FY 1995- 97. • Gaarde Street/121st Avenue pedestrian improvements: These projects, nominated by the Central CIT, have not been included in the proposed update because they include areas outside the city limits. Cost would be approximately $200,000 for each street. • 78th Avenue right-turn lane at Pacific Hiahway: This project, nominated by East CIT, would improve capacity at the intersection. Cost would be about $100,000. I have not included it in the proposed CIP, but only because there is not enough funding available. • Novare bike path correction: This project, nominated by Central CIT, is a very srnall project. It will be completed from maintenance funds and does not need to be part of the CIP. • Other unfunded Dr.o-iects: The priority list developed last year included projects that still are not funded. These projects are reconstruction of the Commercial Street pavement between Main and Hall, addition of a right-turn lane on Hall Blvd. at Scholls Ferry Road, and replacement of the Tigard Street bridge. Parks - Dark levv funding • Terrace Trails nathwav: The current CIP shows a reserve for remaining funds from the 1990 park levy. During Planning Commission review last year, the question was raised whether the remaining funds should be used to complete a trail along the existing greenway between 115th Avenue and 118th Court in the Terrace Trails area. The question has been reviewed through a neighborhood poll and through discussions at the Central CIT. There appears to be roughly an equal number of people for and against a soft trail along the greenway. There appears to be no strong- support for a proposed paved side trail connection between the greenway trail and Fairview Lane; the paved. connection was intended to serve also as a sewer maintenance access driveway. It has been suggested that the trail was promised at the time of the election on the park levy. While we, find no documentation of this, several people have indicated that: they remember that promise being made prior to the election. 1L i MEMO TO PL;LNNING COMMISSION Page 4 r7 I have included the soft trail portion of this project in the proposed CIP update but have deleted the paved side trail/sewer access path to Fairview Lane. In recommending oft that we proceed with the soft trail, I was persuaded by three arguments: first, that the trail may have been a commitment made at the time of the levy election; second, the suggestion that there should be public access to the public greenway area; and, third, the precedent of past Council action in the adjoining Pathfinder/Genesis area, in which Council decided to build the greenway pathways in the face of similar objections from the residents abutting the greenway. At the CIT, there was discussion that similar concerns (crime, litter, etc.) in the Pathfinder area had not proved to be a problem since the trail was completed. The Terrace Trails pathway will be an extension of the existing Pathfinder/Genesis pathway system. Parks-SDC (system development charge) funding • Summerlake Park fencincr: During discussions of the 130th/Winterlake project, the neighborhood raised concerns about lack of a barrier between the play area of Summerlake Park and the traffic of Winterlake Drive. This project would add a fence between the ball field area and the street. • Englewood Park basketball court: ' This project would add a basketball court to Englewood Park in the area between Springwood Drive and Scholls Ferry Road. (Nominated by West CIT. ) • Fanno Creek Park trail liahtina: This project, nominated by East CIT, would add lighting along the existing pathway between Hall and Main and between City Hall and the Senior Center. Pathwav connection from Ash Avenue to Fanno Creek pathway: This project will connect the existing path system to Ash avenue south of the creek. • Fanno Creek uathwav between Hall and Bonita: Preliminary review indicates that this project would have a very high cost (up to $700,000) due to its length and the need to acquire easements. Funding would require elimination of most other park projects. Therefore, I have not included this project in the proposed CIP. However, if the Metro greenspaces measure is approved by the voters, funding for this project may become available in future years. i • New nark on Bull Mountain: West CIT gave this project a high priority. Funds are shown in FY 1997-98 for selection of a site and master planning. Funds are shown in later years for property acquisition. However', actual acquisition and development of a park would likely cost over $2 million. The funded master plan'/site selection is an important first step, AIR& but some other funding source will be needed to actually develop a park. MEMO TO PLANNING COM141ISSION Page 5 Ail • Cook Park bandstand: This project, nominated by the East CIT, is not eligible for SDC funding. So- I have not included it the a° ^"^DC~ed CIP. gOr~e~_cr_ the City' Council is ConSlderin - a, v S g ais AN& funding for this project in the City's general budget. The CIT recommendation has been forwarded to the Council. • SunLmer Creek watershed restoration: This project, nominated by West CIT, is not directly eligible for any of the funding sources in the CIP. However, portions of the work may be eligible as mitigation measures for other projects proposed in the CIP and by private developers. It would be desirable to have a master plan for the overall project. I will explore ways to pursue this project outside the CIP process. • Bull Mountain land purchase: Subsequent to the West CIT meeting, the parks subcommittee of the CIT has recommended purchase of a specific 2-acre parcel for addition to the greenway system on Bull Mountain. We have not had time to evaluate this request. I will try to have more information at y the May 22nd Planning Commission meeting. Sanitarv sewer funding - SDC A county-wide master plan update being completed by the Unified Sewerage Agency will identify a number of long-term sewer capacity upgrades potentially needed in Tigard. The sewer SDC funds are being held in a reserve to fund these capacity projects. Sanitary sewer fundincx - unrestricted A major maintenance fund is established to fund major sewer repairs that are needed from time to time. The remainder of the funding is proposed to be used to establish a new neighborhood sewer extension program. Tigard has a number of residential neighborhoods without sewer 4 lines. Homes in these neighborhoods use septic systems. Failures of septic systems is becoming an increasing problem. However, it seems that the septic systems on adjoining lots seldom fail at the same time. As a result, it is difficult to organize a neighborhood to fund a sewer line extension. Instead, each property owner funds expensive repairs to the septic system as needed. The proposed neighborhood sewer extension program would use City funds to extend the sewer lines. , Reimbursement districts would then be created, so that each property would repay its share of sewer line costs at the time the property is actually connected to the sewer. As long as the property is not connected, the property owner would not have to pay. Through this process, sewer lines would be available to those properties with septic system problems. Any new homes constructed would be connected to the sewer. But properties with good septic systems would not need to connect. MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 r. K: MEE= MEN= As properties are connected, reimbursement fees would be paid to the City. These fees could be used to fund the continuing program. Storm drainaae fundina Future funds for storm drainage projects are expected to be all from SDC sources. These funds can only be used for projects on the Unified Sewerage Agency master plan, which is still being developed. Therefore, these funds are shown in a reserve fund until specific projects can be identified. Water system funding The Council is reviewing options for a long-term water supply. The final decision on the water supply may have a significant impact on the water system capital improvement needs in future years. Therefore, I am recommending that the CIP show only a reserve fund until long-term water system planning is completed. Utilitv manoina Included in both sanitary sewer and water CIP is proposed funding for utility mapping. This funding would be used for professional surveying work required to complete the mapping project. Actual mapping will be completed by staff. Engineering, planning and maintenance staff are working together to mprove the City's existing mapping system and to' combine the utility mapping with existing computerized mapping systems. The expected result is an improved and easier-to-use mapping system, improved coordination between the various utility systems, and maps that are easier to use for developers and contractors. In the long term, we expect to recover the costs through reduced staff time to research utility information and reduced utility conflicts during construction. =w/c:^-may I MEMO TO PLANNING COMISSION Page 7 Attachment 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION z CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 1995-96 THROUGH FY 2001-02 STREET PROJECTS C . I . P . 17- am OTHER - FUNDING PROJECT TIF GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1995-96 Committed projects 1,238,000 762,000 TIF transit reserve 87,000 79th Ave. preliminary design 10,000 130th Ave. (Hawk's Beard to Scholls) -construction 367,021 130th/Winterlake ~-onnection -const. 500,000 Speed bump program 30,000 79th/Durham traffic signal 43,289 School District Totals for FY 1995-96 2,192,021 845,289 FY 1996-97 TIF Transit reserve 89,000 Major maintenance 190,631 Alfred St. paving 30,000 74th Ave. paving (Bonita to Durham) 35,000 Main St. pavement replacement 300,000 Storm drain (Scoffins to 99W and Fanno Creek to 99W) fund Greenburg Road r/w 200,000 Greenburg/Mapleleaf intersection 250,000 TIF reserve 419,702 P Totals for FY 1996-97 958,702 555,631 FY 1997-98 TIF transit reserve 70,000 Major maintenance 300,000 79th avenue 106,906 LID Ped. im-orovements - Park/Watkins 160,000 Bonita railroad crossing 400,000 TIF reserve 341,933 Totals for FY 1997-98 811,933 566,906 FY 1998-99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMIENT PROGRAM (Proposed update 5/15/95) Page 1 3__w-ZT PROJECTS C.I.F. (continued) OTHER FUNDING PROJECT TIF GAS TAY SOURCE TIF transit reserve 54,000 Major Maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Burnham/Main Signal 40,000 80,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 148,084 (design & r/w) TIF reserve 538,675 Totals for FY 1998-99 632,675 578,084 FY 1999-2000 TIF transit reserve 45,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 239,135 TIF reserve 482,509 Totals for FY 1999-00 527,509 589,135 FY 2000-01 TIF transit reserve 35,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 200,000 Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins (design) 50,023 TIF reserve 373,135 Totals for FY 2000-01 408,135 600,023 FY 2001-02 TIF transit reserve 40,000 TIF reserve 373,541 Major :maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins 260,714 413,541- 610,714 A CA.~ITA✓ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Proposed update 5/15/95) Pag6 2 Imp 1: W ORMEMEM PARRS C.I.P. PROJECTS PARK LEVY SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 17,000 524,000 Englewood-Fanno Creek park connection 100,000 Terrace Trail pathway 41,800 5,000 Summerlake Park fencing 4,000 Totals for FY 1995-96 58,800 633,000 FY 1996-97 Woodard-Main park connection 285,000 prop. acquisition & improvements Total for FY 1996-97 285,000 FY 1997-98 Woodard - Main park connection 120,000 Ash Ave - Fanno Creek path connection 30,000 New community park - identify site/master plan 62,000 Total for FY 1997-98 212,000 FY 1998-99 Englewood Park basketball court 15,000 Fanno Creek par's trail lighting 40,000 New Community park - prop. acquisition 105,000 Total for FY 1998-99 160,000 FY 1999-2000 New community park - prop. acquisition 131,000 Total for 1999-2000 131,000 i FY 2000-01 New community park - property acquisition 100,000 Total for 2000-01 100,000 CAPITAL IM3?ROVEM.ENT PROGRAM (Proposed update 5/15/95) Page 3 '''ll willi, 1, I'm pARKS C . I . P continu g, FY 2001-02 New community park - property acquisition 102,000 Total for 2001-02 102,000 7 AMIL CAPITAL IMBROVEMENT PROG?.X4 (Proposed update 5/15/95) Page 4 Loll FAMIMMMMSFMWLUM~ SANITARY SEWER C . I . P . UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW_SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 20,000 10,000 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 589,500 1,388,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. program 455,335 Utility Mapping 25,000 530,3,35 599,500 1,388,000 FY 1996-97 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 349,000 Neighborhood sewer est. grog. 88,734 118,734 349,000 FY 1997-98 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 278,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. grog. 94,216 124,216 278,000 rY 1998-99 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 225,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 99,269 129,269 225,000 FY 1999-2000 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrade 187,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 103,920 133,920 187,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Proposed update 5/15/95) Page 5 A Me, SANITARY SEWER'C.I.P. (continued) FY 2000-01 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve capacity upgrades 142,000 Neighborhood sewer east. grog. 109,776 139,776 142,000 FY 2001-02 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve capacity upgrades 100,000 Neighborhood sewer ext. prog. 160,197 190,197 100,000 CXPITAL IiPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Proposed update 5/15/95) Page 6 OVER!! li, igglIg 11, Ills 41 2,11E i1i rMM STORM DRAINAGE C . I . P . UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW SDC FY 1995-96 Committed projects 80,000 182,000 200,000 Reserve for USA master plan 54,000 518,446 80,000 236,000 718,446 FY 1996-97 Reserve for USA master plan 146,997 -0- 146,997 FY 1997-98 Reserve for USA master plan 108,155 -0- 108,155 FY 1998-99 Reserve for USA master plan 78,534 -0- 78,534 FY 1999-2000 Reserve for USA master plan 61,493 -0- 61,493 2000-0 Reserve for USA master plan 43,311 -0- 43,311 FY 2000-0! Reserve for USA master plan 43,895 Amok -0- 43,895 CAPITAL i,LD:cOVEMENT PROGRAM (Proncsed uUdate 5/15/95) Page 7 ' WATM SYSTEM C . Y . P . WATER FUND FY 1995-96 Committed projects 50,000 North Dakota St. pipeline extension 70,000 Scholls Ferry Rd. pipeline extension 40,000 Peasant skew pressure reducing station 20,000 Highway 217 crossing replacement 270,000 Utility Mapping 25,000 Reserve 164,962 639,962 FY 1996-97 Reserve 388,388 388,388 FY 1997-98 Reserve 359,325 359,325 FY 1998-99 Reserve 327,819 327,819 FY 1999-2000 Reserve 293,733 293,733 FY 2000-2001 Reserve 256,925 256,925 Y 1-000-2001 Reserve 217,249 217,249 CAP TAL 13MPROVEIMIENT PROGRAMS (Proposed update 5/ 15/95) Page 8 III IN i i! USE" Attachment 2 CURRENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 1994-95 THROUGH FY 2000-01 Adopted by City Council August %A 994 F 1 Adopted by City Council on August 23, 1994 STIUMT P1tOJECTS C . T . P . OTHER FUNDING ?ROJ%-IC^ TIF GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1994-95 Committed projects 508,000 27,000 'C'IF Transit reserve 85,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Hall/99W intersection 0 ODOT Grant Ave. sidewalk 40,000 CDBG Grant 72nd/Bonita signal 12,500 12,500 Grant Ave. bridge 140,000 Federal Gran: Main St. pavement replacement 284,500 Storm drain (Fanno Creek to railroad) fund Burnham r/w & widening @ Main 150,000 130-th Ave. (Hawk's Beard to Scrolls) - design 50,000 130thM nterlake connection -design 60,000 Bonita Road (Fanno Creek to 72nd) 1,062,500 Totals ?or FY 1994-95 1,928,000 804,000 FY 1995-96 TT_F trans-4= reserve 87,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Tiedeman Ave. b='-dge replacement 200,000 Federal Grant Main St. pavement repolacea:ent 299,000 Storm drain (Scofo~~s 996W _ Fanro Creek to 99W) fund 79th Ave. arel?:^.ina_y des_rn 20,000 Bon=a Rd. ("F-znno Ct. to 72zd) 110,000 130th Ave. ('-:-=wk's Beard to Scrolls) -ccns-:=--,cz.'-cn 360,000 130th!,'iinter_aca connection -coast. 269,000 Totals for -TY 1995-96 !,025,000 619,000 I 1151 11 STREET PROJECTS C.I.P. ccntlnued) _ OTHER FUNDING DROP--CT TIE GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1946-g7 TIE Transit reserve 89,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Main St. pavement replacement 212,000 Storm drain (railroad to Sco=ins) fund Pedestrian .mzrovements - nark/rgatkins 122,V0 130th/W4nterlace connection - const. 205,000 Greenburg Road =/w 200,000 Greenburg/mapleleaf intersection 250,000 Walnut (132nd to 135th)-des1gn & r/w 301,000 Totals =or FY 1996-97 1,045,000 634,000 FY 1997-48 TIE transit reserve 70,000 Major maintenance 300,000 79th 3venne 311,000 LID Ped. imvrove_*nents - Park/Watkins 38,000 Walnut St. (132nd to 135th) - const. 749,000 Totals =or _Y 1997-93 819,000 649,000 Lev 1948-94 5.1_,000 T-_ tr3_^.S__ reserve Major Maintena:^.ce 300,000 Pedestrian i.Tnrovemenzs 30,000 Burnham/Ma_n S=anal 60,000 60,000 North Dakota -dge replacement 254,000 Nalnut S- z. (132nd to 135t ) - ccnst. 245, 000 Walnut/T edeman intersection 281,000 -desic^ & r/w Totals :c_- TY -1-999-99 640,000 664,000 AII MINE STREET PROJECTS C.I.B. (continged) OTHER FUNDING PROJECT TIF GAS TAX SOURCE FY 1999-2000 TIF transit reserve 45,000 Major maintenance 300,000 Pedestrian improvements 50,000 North Dakota bridge replacement 329,000 Walnut/Tiedeman intersection - r/w 490,000 Totals for FY 1999-00 535,000 679000 FY 2000-01 TIF transit reserve 35,000 Major maintenance ' 300,000 Pedestrian i_-nnrove-ments 50,000 Walnut/Tiedeman intersection - const. 255,000 Walnut (121st to 132nd)-design & r/w 126,000 Hall/Hunricer/Sco=fins 344,000 Totals for =Y 2000-01 416,000 694,000 t PARKS C . I . P . P.4,R:Z LEVY SDC FY 1994-95 committed projects 16,000 290,000 Cook Park picnic shelter replacement 30,000 74th Ave. natural area park - prop. acq. 280,000 - improvements 97,000 Natural area addition to Cook Park - prop. acq. 60,000 F Fanno Creek pathway (N. Dakota to Tigard St.) 50,000 Park levy reserve 66,000 Totals ear FY 1994-95 112,000 7.77000 FY 1995--96 Englewood-Fanno Creek park connection 100,000 Woodard - Main St. park connection 203,000 (property acquisition) Totals for FY 1995-96 303.000 -v 1996_9; Woodard-Main oar's connection 200,000 pron. acquisition improvements New community park - identify sitel:naster plan 68,000 Total for FY 1996-97 268,000 FY 1997-98 New community park - prop. acquisition 194,000 } Total for FY 1997-98 194,000 :V 1acg_99 New Community park - prop. acquisition 142,000 Total for FY lang_ga 142,000 :v 1 ac9_~ ~0c New coI*mun:_y pa=k - prop. acquisition -12,000 Total for -999-2000 112,000 :V 2000-01 New ccrmmunity park - pr C-, )---a4sition 80,000 Tctal for 2000 90,000 SANITARY .9V-wZR C. M.P. 71 UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW SDC FY 1994-95 Committed projects 21,000 110,000 Major maintenance 30,000 Gentle Woods sewer protection 50,000 Easements for future extension 50,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 872,000 589,500 867,000 973,000 639,500 977,000 Fv 1995-96 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 127,000 411,000 157,000 41-21,000 FY 1996-9 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 124,000 349,000 154,000 349,000 FY 1997-99 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 122,000 278,000 152,000 278,000 Y 1998-90 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve for capacity upgrades 119,000 225,000 148,000 225,000 ^v 1909-2000 Major maintanance 30,000 1111000 187,000 144,000 187,000 2000-01- Major ma' .zanance 30,000 Reserve capac'-_y Lpg;ades 109,000 142,000 139,000 142,000 t STORM D C.=.P. UNRESTRICTED OLD SDC NEW SDCSDC FY 1994-95 Committed projects 89,000 50,000 Major maintenance 30,000 Main St. nine replacement 125,000 Drainage at 98th & Scott 25,000 Walnut culvert replacement 100,000 76th Ave. drainage 25,000 93rd/Elrose area drainage 20,000 Hill St. nine replacement 15,000 Reserve 207,000 676,000 386,000 300,000 676,000 FY 1995-96 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve 21,000 183,000 51,000 183,000 rv i996-97 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve 17,000 159,000 47,000 159,000 =v 1997-98 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve 12,000 121,000 42,000 121,000 ,v 1 an8-99 Major maintenance 30,000 Reserve 66,000 92,000 36,000 92,000 ='v 199Q-200 Major ma_. t-enance 30,000 -Reserve 75,000 30,000 75,000 =v 2000-0= Major maintenance 23,000 Reserve 5.7, 000, 23,000 57,000 WA%MX 3YSTEM C.T.P. WATER FUND FY 1994-95 Committed projects 25,000 North Dakota St. pipeline extension 70,000 Scholls Ferry Road pipeline extension 40,000 Reserve for reservoir 2,043,000 2,178,000 FY i995-96 Schoils Ferry/See= Send reservoir 448,000 Pleasant View pressure reducing station 20,000 Highway 217 crossing replacement 220,000 683,000 FY 1996-97 Reserve 632,000 632,000 FY 1997-98 121st/Walnut pipeline extension 450,000 Reserve 120,000 - 570,000 FY 1998-99 Reserve 503,000 503,000 FY 1999-2000 Reserve 430,000 :30,000 Y 2000-2^0= Reserve 350,000 350,000 71 Attachment # 3 C.I.T. RECOMMENDATIONS Him z 1~:ravRA°a~ v'v' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Members of the WEST CIT DATE: May 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Recommendations for CIP projects There were 40 members present at the WEST CIT meeting on Tuesday, May 2. On a vote of 28 - 5, the members present recommend the following regarding the CIP. The following factors (in priority order) should be considered when determining priorities for CIP funding. • Safety • Environmental Issues • Cost Effectiveness • Quality of Life • (Natural) Resource Management • Maintenance of Neighborhood Integrity • Cumulative Impact NOTE: The minority opinion does not concur with the list of guidelines for CIT project priority selection. This list of factors was the guideline used by members of the WEST CIT is selecting and prioritizing their CIT recommendations as follows: • Walnut/Tiedeman intersection be moved up to the 1995-96 fiscal year. • Double or more the funding for "Speed Humps" for the upcoming fiscal year. • Park on Bull Mountain be given priority attention. • Summer Creek Watershed restoration. • Englewood Park a.) Installation of Basketball Court. The members of the WEST CIT present at this meeting recommend no approval for city funding of Winterlake/130 extension. In addition to the priority list, the CIT members request Council give their full attention to the CIT position on this matter. information received by the Facilitator indicates that a number of citizens in favor of the extension were purposely not at the meeting because they felt further discussion is nothing but a delaying tactic on the part of those against. YEA ftdl4 *.4 the' abers LPL a,. _Y~b.. Y8C217iici.7 of the tlilr.t:9'1 G.I'.l. O=LeY' the following general statements: * Increase of all parks development. F Request that city look at a park bond measure. Increase funding for parks and open spaces. The members of the WEST CIT also request that the Council's decision regarding the CIP and the reasons behind the decisions be forwarded to the CIT. NUM c.c: Planning Commission members t MAN MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: South CIT Members DATE: May 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Recommendations on CIP Projects At their May 3, 1995 meeting the 19 members present came to a consensus on CIP project recommendations (in priority order) as follows: • 79th and Durham signal - fund in FY 95 - 96. • In the parks CIP, obtain greenway along Fanno Creek from east side of Hall to Bonita. • Bikepath extension on Ash Street. cc: Planning Commissioners c MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Central CIT Members DATE: May 11, 1995 SUBJECT: CIP Recommendations At the May 4, 1995 Central CIT meeting members discussed the CIP list. Consensus was to recommend the following: Priority 1s Pedestrian improvements on Gaarde Street from lloth to 321st. (or at least from 110th to 118th). Priority 2: Pedestrian improvements on Watkins Avenue from Walnut Street to Park Street. Other Recommendations (not necessarily in priority order) • Pedestrian improvements on 121st from Walnut Street to Gaarde Street. • Pedestrian improvements on Walnut Street from Fowler School to 135th Avenue. • Install ramp on Novare to make bike path accessible to handicapped. • Improve any intersections where pedestrian paths are not handicap accessibly:. • Pedestrian access from Ash Street to the Fanno Creek Bridge. Fmm %M*V1"r%" 'A ITV%TTW J7ial7V i%6-"\ b0 6JJ'1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable mayor and council FROM: Members of the Central CIT DATE: May 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Terrace Trails Pathway project At their meeting, on Tray 4, 1995 the members of the Central discussed the Terrace Trails pathway project. Consensus of the group was to forward the following comments regarding the project to City Council. Pro: 1.) Greenway area for use for people in the area; connecting to other trails helpful to access public lands; sense of community. 2.) Walker hasn't noticed litter, noise on existing pathways would like to continue path. 3.) Will be used as a transportation alternative. 4.) Maintain natural greenway as much as possible. 5.) Only part of a major plan for connecting walk/pathways. Con: 1.) Property adjacent to greenbelt opposed - loss of wildlife habitat, trees and undergrowth, excess noise due to use. 2.) Concerns on continuing maintenance of trail - haw often? (want specific examples). 3.) Crime access possible - major concern. 4.) Wetness and train may cause too much maintenance. 5.) Can we keep it natural and green as much as possible? 6.) Loss of privacy. 7.) Strangers and concern for child safety. 8.) Possible erosion due to new usage. 9.) Redirect money to better use; sidewalks, etc. General Comments: 1.) Asphalt issue needs to be addressed as a single issue separate from the trail. 2.) Specific trees to be removed has not been determined. 3.) Understanding that construction planned to be like a forest path (weaving around most trees.) 4.) Understanding there was a visual survey by the city of the pathway in April 1995. i IM rte; In addition, consensus of the CIT members present was to forward the Pollowing comments regarding the proposed asphalt surface for the pathway. Pro: • Sewer service access (sewer access needed by city - about a®° length). Con: • Trees removed, loss of scenery. • Steepness may cause injuries i.e. playing children, rollerblades, skateboards. • Is drainage towards any residential homes? • Nothing to prevent children from going down steep access. • Wasted money for a "just in case" need. Turn-a-round at bottom will damage a park like setting. -.21210MME, am"'. 01" ;I Ull MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilors FROM: East CIT Members DATE: May 15, 1995 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Recommendations At the East CIT melting on May 10, 1995, consensus of members n present was to forward the following to City Council regarding CIP priorities. • The proposed linearjgreenway park along Fanno Creek from Nall to Bonita is a low priority. • A bandstand at Cook Park is a high priority to be added to the -95-1'96 budget. Also suggested that the community raise funds. • Alfred Street paving is a high priority, all in attendance agree it should be completed as soon as possible. • Fanno Creek lighting is a low priority. • A right turn lane on 78th at 99W southbound is a medium priority. • Consensus of the group is high priority means now; medium priority means within 2 - 3 years; low priority means 4 - 5 years. cc: Planning Commissioners V R5 May 5, 1995 ` 1895 MAY 3.2 John Acker, Maintenance Svc Property Mgr. City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Acker: The parks, subcommittee and members of the West Tigard Citizen Involvement Team would like to submit a proposal that, pending availability of sufficient funds, the City of Tigard purchase a 2 acre parcel of private property that would allow the opportunity to utilize this parcel as an undeveloped greenway adjacent to open space areas already owned by the City of Tigard. This parcel would allow the connection of two other parcels and provide an uninterrupted pathway for waiking, biking, running and hiking from Benchview Estates to the Morning Star subdivision on'the opposite side. It will also be directly accessible to residents of Three Mountain Estates and the new Hillshire subdivision. The J, parcel does contain some old growth along with a desirable amount of new growth. It has areas that are level and would be ideal for such improvements as picnic tables, a water fountain, benches and a restroom facility. The City of Tigards adjacent seven acre parcel connected to this two acre parcel would make all nine acres usable. The West Tigard CIT members are supportive of identifying and preserving the few remaining undeveloped areas that would lend themselves to a continuous path of greenspaces and natural areas throughout the City of Tigard. These paths would connect to the already existing protected areas and allow pedestrian access to these open spaces. Other than the upkeep of footpaths, it is felt that this is the most economical way to provide this resource and ^t the same time, provide easy and convenient access to the largest number of residents. A network of paths could even reduce the number of vehicle trips required for many citizens to travel to a parklike destination. We feel that this parcel meets the criteria necessary to achieve such pathways and the owners are sincere in their hopes that this parcel not become another high-density subdivision. The owners are willing to work with the City of Tigard to come to agreeable terms on the sale of the property. On behalf of a majority vote of the April,95 West Tigard CIT participants, we submit the following parcel of privately owned property be reviewed and considered for acquisition by the City of Tigard.: 115 k, Drnnnrly irw P InfC"384 Map Taxiot 2S14®C-05901 Steve Hocker Parks & Openspaces Subcommittee West Tigard CI T Ph# (Hm 530-4222) (Wk 220-1711) cc: Liz Newton, City of Tigard ti: 'r - am MEN= Attachment COMMITTED PROJECTS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS 40 COMMTTED PROJECTS These are projects under construction or otherwise committed that will not be completed on June 30, 1995. The costs for completion: are shown in FY 1995-96 CIP as "Committed Protects". Streets - TIF Burnham right of way and widening at Main Street. ' Bonita Road (72nd to Fanno Creek) 130th/Winterlake connection - design. 130th Ave. (Hawks Beard to Scholls Ferry) - design. TIF transit reserve from prior years. Cascade Blvd. right of way. 109th Extension (Naeve to 99W). Streets - aas tax 1995 pavement major maintenance program. Bonita/72nd signal revisions and intersection improvements. Main Street reconstruction (Scoffins to Fanno Creek). Grant Avenue sidewalk. Ross St. realignment at Hall - right of way. Parks t 74th Avenue natural area park Fanno Creek pathway (North Dakota to Tigard St.) Sanitarv Sewer Major maintenance work Easement acquisition. Storm Drainaae, Hill Street line replacement. Shady Lane drainage improvements. Major maintenance work. Main Street svstem replacement. Walnut Street culvert. 76th Avenue drainage. Grant Avenue bridge replacement. Tiedeman Avenue bridge replacement. rw/ein-att4 Iwo XHI IT TERRACE TRAILS PATHWAY LOCATION MAP NOTE: The paved connection to Fairview Lane is not included in the recommended CIP. liglipliql1l a . ..1VJ1i T 7,n~Ni R: IM RA 11600 1888 1148 9 11868 ••;,®6 'r 13183 13200 ®p `~ro~ 13ZOd ;14 0 10 13233 13248 /3t?/J 'lye, 'lye Zj 13305 00 did °jd~A r 4490 ~F /3 411 ae. <)d®~ P° "ADO 4306. Q. ®3 //dBd ®p 13385 z ~~t 00 %0 13425 i,$$ S 3t~ //11' ~ 5 3p /3 Cam p P3 ;r eo .13475 . in ~~a m® 4e /i % a 0t5 13335 ; 13530 %n. o 117(0 1171& 13575 Al HC IigTS ISTO 11696 11570 13615 13810 113633 11888 11680 1 11640 / P 11/c `JS Ai7 13635 13660 13675 11695 11890 11630 )/QdJ 13858 3 13680 13735 10 11705 ^ 13j03 ~ a n - - 12 • 13700 4 13745 /3gps / d~/d FAIRVIEW lq& 13Te:0 13ytf5 I ♦3~d~~ )d' 3'31 `J73p 13733 = 13730 n a 13750 13775 in 13735 13750 137,50 13758 = 13750 - - 13790. , 13795 R r ~ti 13803 / 800 i I3775 o /3j'p rg;Its ~3Tj0 13815 13800 13816 U 138 I 13820 13835 12025 pA/; rF rl\ pAMY l" n 1,/ rf1 VV//~ !3850 13853 f © rE h /~A Yq YS, 13860 13873 12013 13890 13923 PATHWAY WIM 1i& 13800 13895 CN1P SURFACING H 13930 I WMOUN L 10• PAYED PATHWAY I N A { p I Ct n I 4 r~ 1EE c ~ I . art. .e.A June 3, 1995 C1 OREGON 130th venue Interlake Drive Connection Project Report At the February project meeting, a list was made of neighborhood issues and suggestions. We agreed to respond with a written report prior to the next project meeting. A copy of the report is enclosed. The next project meeting will be scheduled for July. When the date is known, notice will be sent to everyone on the project mailing list. Notice of the meeting will also be included in the Cityscape. The July project meeting will be the opportunity to discuss any remaining design issues for the 130th/Wint€rlake connection. All interested citizens are encouraged to attend and participate in the July meeting. Currently, the schedule calls for construction to occur in the summer of 1996. We expect to improve 130th Avenue between Hawks Beard Street and Scholls Ferry Road during the sarne time period. Sincerely, Sincerely Randall R. Wooley Gary fso , P.E. C City Engineer Senior Project Engineer GA:130-proi.mtg 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 634-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 1 1i 1!iE v 130th/Winterieke Connection Dune, 1995 Background On February 27th a neighborhood meeting was held at Conestoga School to discuss the design of the proposed street connection across Summer Creek between 130th Avenue and Winterlake Drive. At the meeting, the design consultant described design options that had been considered, the design that was being proposed and the reasons for selecting the proposed option. There was considerable discussion of various design elements and some suggestions for changes to be considered. Project Design Attachment #1 shows a plan view of the bridge. This plan has been revised to incorporate suggestions received at the February meeting. Attachment # 1 also has a side view of the proposed bridge showing the proposed edge treatment and `Texas Rail'. The proposed bridge is a single-span concrete structure. The street is to be 30 feet wide at the bridge, narrower than the existing 130th Avenue and Winterlake Drive. The reduced width is intended to discourage high traffic speeds. There will be sidewalks across the bridge on both sides of the street. The sidewalks will be 3 feet wide, wider than the existing sidewalks along 130th and Winterlake. In addition, the existing park pathway and pedestrian. bridge along the lake will remain. The existing pedestrian bridge will be moved slightly and upgraded to become a permanent structure. The bridge abutments and approach fill will cover approximately 0.2 acres of existing wetlands. State and federal permits will be required for this work in the wetland area. The permits will require the City to provide mitigation for the wetland impacts. Tree planting along Summer Creek upstream of the bridge is the proposed mitigation method, based on input received at the February meeting. Issues and responses from February meeting At the February meeting, 17 issues or suggestions were listed: Staff and consultant agreed to review these issues. The 17 issues/suggestions are shown below, along with responses prepared by the City staff and the consultant.. PROJECT REPORT - 130th/VVinterlake Connection Page 1 E !I OEM I Issues/suggestions: 1. Continuation of existing pathway at lake level. Response: This suggestion has been incorporated into the revised design (Attachment #1). 2. Save existing fir tree at south end of bridge. !Response: In the revised design, sidewalk routes have been revised to save the existing tree. However, the revised sidewalk route will require additional filling, which may also be a concern. We plan to have additional discussion of the sidewalk design options at the next neighborhood meeting. 3. Narrow roadway to 30 feet. Response: The revised design incorporates this suggestion. 4. Install speed bumps. Response: The City has a trial program to install some speed bumps on City streets this year. The bumps will be based on a design used by the City of Portland. These bumps give a gentle ride in most vehicles at speeds of 25 mph and less. At higher speeds, they are uncomfortable in most vehicles. The cities that use these bumps recommend that they only be used on residential streets that have a documented problem of a substantial portion of the vehicles exceeding the residential speed limit. They have developed criteria for determining where speed bumps sIIC7UlU Ue IllstallGd. Experience in other cities indicates that the bumps also have some negative aspects. The most frequent complaints from residents relate to appearance and noise. Some people do not like the appearance of the bumps and the traffic signing and markings that go with the bumps. There is some added traffic noise. Also, there is some added maintenance costs. For these reasons, bumps are not installed until it is clear that their advantages will outweigh their disadvantages. Past speed counts on Winterlake Drive south of Brittany have indicated that the street does not now meet the recommended criteria for speed bump installation. Perhaps this will change after the 130th/Winterlake connection is opened. We have identified potential locations where speed bumps could be installed near the bridge if needed. We will recommend that funding for potential speed bumps be included in the project funding, so that the bumps could be promptly added if needed after the street is open. ' PROJECT REPORT - 130th/Winterlake Connection Page 2 OWEN i ~ 6. Install fence around Surnmerlake Park. - AWW Response: The major concern was to separate play areas from street traffic and especially to prevent children from chasing balls into the street. To address this concern, funding for fencing of the ball field area near Brittany Drive has been included in the proposed FY 1006-06 capital improvement program. The Planning Commission has recommended the funding. The Commission's recommendation will be reviewed by City Council on June 13th. 6. Incorporate traffic diverters at Hawks Beard. Response: Staff has been working with the Summerlake Homeowners Association to review options for discouraging through traffic in the Summerlake neighborhood. A traffic diverter at Hawks Beard is one of the options being reviewed. The Homeowners Association has not yet formally indicated their preferences. Final approval will require coordination with the Fire Marshall's office and a separate approval of the City Council. The options being considered are low in cost and can be included in the 130thMinteriake project if approved. 7. Stop sign at 130th and Hawks Beard. Response: The concern was to slow traffic and improve safety at the intersection. The proposal was to require 130th traffic to stop at the intersection. Currently, there is a sight distance problem at the intersection. The intersection will be revised as part of the project to improve 130th between Hawks Beard and Scholls Ferry Road. These revisions should improve sight distance and delineation of the intersection, thereby improving safety. Proposed traffic diverters on Hawks Beard may lead to other intersection revisions. This month, stop signs will be added at the intersection to address the current sight distance problem until 130th is improved to the north. The need for signing will again be evaluated as part of the project design for the 130th improvements north of Hawks Beard. Experience shows that stop signs do not always improve safety. They should be used with caution, as explained in Attachment #2. 8. Crosswalk locations near the bridge and through the park. Response: Experience shows that crosswalks do not necessarily improve safety for pedestrians. Attachment #3 is are example of many studies that have led to this conclusion. Winterlake and 130th in the vicinity of the park are expected to remain residential in character with generally low speeds and low to moderate traffic volumes. Therefore, staff is not recommending the installation of crosswalks at this time. Crosswalks can easily be added later if needed. PROJECT REPORT - 130th/Winteriake Connection Page 3 10 ii ag GINNIE NO IN 9. Separate sidewalk from roadway. Response: This suggestion applied primarily to the bridge. There was concern about pedestrian safety and a request to consider a barrier between the sidewalk and the street. Instead of a barrier, the design includes wider sidewalks across the bridge. There will also be an alternative pedestrian bridge for those who feel uncomfortable walking across the street bridge. The harrier was rejected because it would create maintenance problems, would create a potential hazard for vehicles and bicycles, and would cause some obstruction to sight distance. In other locations in Tigard, the wider sidewalk has proven more effective than the barriers, even on higher speed streets. In at least one location, the barrier has been removed because of the problems it caused. x 10. Use "Texas" rail if cost is not too high; second choice is "combination" rail. Concern about safety for small children. Response: The consultant agreed to bring some better pictures of the railing } options to the next project meeting, so that residents could better judge the appearance and safety of the railings. Final selection of the railing will be deferred r to the next meeting. Currently, the Texas rail is proposed, as shown in Attachment #1. 11. Make sure mitigation is part of bridge contract and done together. Response: it may be better to issue a separate contract for the mitigation work, because the mitigation work would not normally be done by a bridge contractor. However, the two contracts can be issued at the same time. The state and federal permits will likely dictate the schedule for mitigation. 12. Neighborhood review of final plans before bidding. Response: An opportunity wili be provided for interested citizens to review the final construction drawings priorto bidding. Construction drawings will be prepared after the next project meeting. 13. Use tree planting along stream for mitigation. Encourage camouflage of bridge. Use trees as large as possible. Response: Staff agrees. We will propose trees as the mitigation method. Final approval will be needed from the permitting agencies; however, we anticipate the agencies will agree to the proposal. The sides of the bridge will be finished with a stone pattern to bland in with the surrounding trees and brush. PROJECT REPORT - 130th/ Vintedake Connection Page 4 jig 14. Provide photos or better illustration of Texas rail. Response: Will be done at the next project meeting. See Issue ##10 and - Attachment #1. 15. Put summary of meetings in the Cityscape. Response: Usually, meeting announcements are put in the Cityscape for projects ' of interest to a large neighborhood. Follow-up information usually is mailed directly to those who have indicated an interest. For the 130th/Winteriake project, a substantial mailing list has been developed from previous meetings and previous Cityscape announcements. Any interested party can be added to the project mailing list by contacting the Engineering Department. We will continue to give notice of the meetings in the Cityscape. In addition, the next notice will advise interested citizens to obtain a copy of this report. 16. Prefer single-span bridge. Response: The proposed design is a single-span bridge. 17. Remove overhead utilities. Response: The existing overhead lines belong to GTE. GTE has indicated that the lines can be relocated underground at the time of the 130th/Winterlake construction. rw/130.report PROJECT REPORT - 130th/Winterlake Connection Page 5 7r ENE ~ WIN Yf-f x' A3()TH A~ oSed l n "A Sidewoiks Existing Pavement --pro / lytN © e r3 i' xisting A path to Foot Bridge RelOco Existing q K Evergreen S U M M E R Proposed SideR c f on Con path Existing ! I Roil Concrete Badge I ' Engtneof Ta4~ Tr an,n.E` N4. Surface eotment r 0 : ~~C ~a Concrete 014 3 ~y ATTACHMENT # 2 ' 6TOID NGWS WHY DON'T THEY PUT IN MORE STOP SIGNS? A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effective control devices when used at the right place and under the right conditions. It is intended to help drivers and pedestrians at an intersection decide who has the right-of-way. One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic, either by causing it to stop, or by causing such an inconvenience as to force the traffic to use other routes. Where stop signs are installed as "nuisances" or "speed breakers," there is a high incidence of intentional violation. In those locations where vehicles do stop, the speed reduction is effective only in the immediate vicinity of the stop sign, and frequently speeds are actually higher between intersections. For these reasons, it should not be used as a speed control device. A school crossing may look dangerous for children to use, causing parents to demand stop sign to halt traffic. Now a vehicle which had been a problem for 3 seconds while approaching and passing the intersection becomes a problem for a much longer period. A situation of indecision is created as to when to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as a motorist. Normal gaps in traffic through which crossings could be made safely no longer exist. An intersection which previously was not busy now looks like a major intersection. It really isn't - it just looks like it. It doesn't even look safer and it usually isn't. Most drivers are reasonable and prudent with no intention of maliciously violating traffic regulations; however, when an unreasonable restriction is imposed, it may result in flagrant violations. In such cases, the stop sign can create a false sense of security in a pedestrian and an attitude of contempt in a motorist. These two attitudes can and often do conflict with tragic results. Well-developed, nationally recognized guidelines help to indicate when such controls become necessary. These guidelines take into consideration, among other things, the probability of vehiclc:: arriving at an intersection at the same time, the length of time traffic must wait to enter, and the availability of safe crossing opportunities. j r. g'' 1111 yy; ATTACHMENT # 3 JA T V _Q C eV VV -U WHEN IS A CROSSWALK UNSAFE? Apparently, whenever it is painted on the street! A number of years back, the City of San Diego published some startling results of a very extensive study of the relative safety of marked and unmarked crosswalks. Sari Diego looked at 400 intersections for five years (without signals or four-way stops) that had a marked crosswalk on one side and an unmarked crosswalk on the other. About two and one half times as many pedestrians used the marked crosswalk, but about six times as many accidents were reported in the marked crosswalks! Long Beach studied pedestrian safety for three years (1972 through 1974) and found eight times as many reported ' pedestrian accidents at intersections with marked crosswalks than at those without. One explanation of this apparent contradiction of common sense is the false security pedestrians feel at the marked crosswalk. Two painted lines do not provide protection against an oncoming vehicle and the real burden of safety has to be on the pedestrian to be alert and cautious while crossing any street. A pedestrian can stop in less than three feet, while a vehicle traveling at 25 MPH will require 60 feet and at 35 MPH approximately 100 feet. The California Vehicle Code says that a crosswalk exists at all intersections unless pedestrian crossing is prohibited by signs. Some of these crosswalks are marked with painted lines, but most of them are not. Pedestrian crosswalk marking is a method of encouraging pedestrians to use a particular crossing. Such marked crossings may not be as safe as an unmarked crossing at the same location. Therefore, crosswalks should be marked only where necessary for the guidance and control of pedestrians, to direct them to the safest of several potential routes. * ` \ W Cicl 4rnt4 6{xi Drer7s,t 1Aws ate 5im; 14r° \ u~ MMISOMEM 21 101~ -Rib I CUM nr,e Agenda Rom No. ''MEMO -71 li Dear City Council, I am writing to protest the connection of 130'' and Winterlake. For what it would do to the area there seems to be no gain and in fact would create a loss and a set of new problems. The following states some of my views. Traffic: I understand that part of the reason for connecting Winterlake and 130'h is to relieve the traffic on the other two routes accessing the park. There already exists a bottleneck at Winterlake by Winterlake Court. Even though a parking lot was built at the far end of the park it is utilized to a very small extent. Most of the activities take place at the opposite end of the park and cars are continually parked on both sides of the street creating a bottleneck of single lane traffic. Certainly making a through street through there is going to compound that problem. For the most part, because the street is a dead end the traffic is slow. If it becomes a through stre-t the speed with pick up in addition to the congestion of all the parked cars and children. The other two routes coming into the park do not have the problem of parking to deal with. For the small reduction of traffic on those routes a bigger problem would be created right in front of the park. Safety of Children: I have aiso been led to understand that if the road does go through an 8-9 foot chain link fence will be built around the park for the safety of children. If that is the plan then it must have been recognized that making a through street in front of a park heavily utilized by children is increasing the danger to children from cars. There is something wrong with the logic of putting a road through and fencing the park in. A park is meant to be an open area for people to enjoy and to enjoy looking at. I don't think looking at an 8-9 foot fence in enjoyable and certainly defeats the purpose of keeping green space within our city. Wetlands: The city has worked very hard to preserve the wetlands in the past. Why is a road that certainly .s not necessary being pushed through this beautiful area? It is not worth the risk of ruining the habitat of this area that we all enjoy to have another piece of asphalt. Maintaining this serene area has to be worth more than this. People from outside this neighborhood have always stated how lucky we are to have this wetland area to enjoy - and whenever they have seen the sign stating that this road may be connected they have been aghast that it would even be considered. Cost: As a taxpayer I feel that $857,000 is an enormous amount of money that in today's world could certainly be put to better use. There are so many more important things that it could be used for. In closing I would like to recommend a vote against the Winterlake - 130'' connection.. Thank you for your attention. Nikki Breitbarth nrl r7,-1 JUtJ 1 °y5 in l, rIJ June 9, 1995 12 19 5 City Council 16 PGt~~iL M~»en r J, R City of Tigard .Agenda Rom U Nv~ I L 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 - Meeting ol<_ He: Capital Improvement Plan / WinterLake Connection - L Honorable City Council Members: I -would like to -ke a e nn"nutses oil your time to o JJJ1 er my ti ou3LS`s and opinions with regard to this issue. At the recent meeting before the planning commission, Lhe West CI.T had sent the recommendation (by an overwhelming majority) to move the WinterLake/130th connection down on the priority list and to move up on the priority list the Tiedeman/ Walnut intersection improvements. This was based on the fact that there had been several accidents at that intersection. Mr. Wooley testified that the Tiedeman/ Walnut intersection improvements did not classify as a project since it bordered non-city property. I believe that to be false since it had already been on the project list. The West CIT only wanted it to be moved up on the priority list. Despite the input from the West CIT, the commission voted to keep the WinterLake/ 130th connection as an immediate priority. Again, at this meeting the overwhelming majority of the public attendees were overwhelmingly against immediate funding of this project. Also at this meeting, testimony was presented about inadequate emergency vehicle access to the area. If that is indeed the case, why were the houses in this area allowed to be built without adequate emergency vehicle access? Many of the people we talked to who were against having this connection built, were reluctant to get directly involved because they felt that the city would do whatever they wanted anyway. Those of us that have been directly involved and are against this proposal, felt that if we showed enough support against this proposal. we could make a difference. Obviously, up to this point we have been wrong. You have the opportunity to show the citizens of Tigard that the City of Tigard does listen to it's citizens and that they can make a difference. We urge you to consider the input from the west CIT, and move this project down the priority list, or remove it altogether. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Carl V. Gioia - 11201 S.W. WinterLake Drive Tigard, Or. 97223 524-1720 4 611195 10:25:18 Page 2 oft Mayor Jim Nicoli M Stock 503-523-6247 JUN 1 : 1995 ULI~i ~ Mike & Marti Stuck COUNCIL MAIL - Kam 13240 SW Brittany Drive Tigard OR 9722-1b4Q C.. i June 13. 1995 Agenda Item No. ~ Jim Nicoli. Mayor Tigard Cif..- u_t1t of 13125 SW Mall Blvd. Ti:aurd OR 97223 Dear Mr. Mayor: will be unable to attend toniAit's City Council meeting. so we are writing to Urge you most einpllatically to support crympletion of the 130th/Winterl:ake street project. It is our understanding that: w The Piatning Commission has voted 6 to 1 in favor of the project. a Funds are available for constriction of the bridge and coinlectin<, road. o Tigard voters endorsed the project when the Sunimerlake park bonds were approved. o This project has begin identified as a collector street in the Comprehensive Plan for more than 10 years. a City professional staff have recommended that the project be completed. a Emergency vehicles (fire and ambulance) may be delayed if the project is not completed. a Citizen concerns reeardinQ the wetlands in the area have been addressed. Perhaps most importantly, it is our feeling that the Tigard City Council, after much public debate, approved this 2roiect at a meeting we attended almost a year ago. Regardless of the legal or procedural technicalities that may have necessitated tonight's vote, we would view a reversal of that earlier decision as a betrayal of public trust. We honestly believe that this issue hinges oil the unwillingness of a small group of Tigard residents to bear their fair share of the increased traffic that has impacted this region of the city. It is a classic case ofNIMBY ("Not In \fy Back Yard"). Please support this project. and help brinar an end to the ivranglincr! Thank- you for your consideration. Sincerelv. Mike d \farv Stock Public Comment Agenda Item No. 6 Council Meeting of 6/13/95 Telephone call received on 6/13/95 Teresa Adams of 8728 S.W. Brightfield Circle called to say she was very much opposed to the 130th/WJinterlake Connection. She said her concern that l1.. once the tranquility of this area is taken away, you cannot replace those things... 11 She advised she will try to be here to testify. She also noted that she lives 3-4 miles away from park. Message taken by Cathy Wheatley City Recorder Public Comment Agenda Item No. 6 Council Meeting - 6/13/95 Telephone Message to Council for Heeting Chris Garstek called, 11774 S. T. 125th Court, Tigard, Oregon 97223. She identified herself as the person who submitted a letter referring to the 250 names on a petition in support of the 130th/Winterlake connection. She commented as follows: • signs are posted on City barricades which advises of the meeting tonight that says "last chance to save our our forest ...B1 (or "...save our stream-11 she was not sure of exact wording) • asked for Council to remember the 250 people who signed the petition who supported the connection; these people live in the area • doubts many people in support will testify tonight as they feel they have expressed themselves; she said that "they think the connection will happen" based on past communications r two people in opposition to the connection have placed their homes on the market. Message taken by Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder, 12:30 p.m., 6/13/95 'Mich.-r5:'.r • e IV% We support the use of city monies to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the children of this community. A traffic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidents occ-! Frring there. Print Name Address Phone # sozb Scv s s.,f. Mangy . i I! IN; 1111: 111~ 1 2!! 511 :Y- s We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the children of this comma inity. A traff ic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidents occurring there. Print Dame Address Phone # Al R ,LL.E -r-7- 12n4--y 6 S f}S aRP. T ~z Gd' d 7 L;da, J 6a ri-O aj ~kp o SW '46 rt~o %06 GI~a Cow- 3 d 7451 5W orof 54 7)~q arct, OP- 579- 7920 --T- o' C, C ~ 5°rLl~° e~C~SS f S ''1 S - cL (Q81 7o) A - a-~l (~4~ !7-v 3 7 , l j o 02 - &&v tl6a~~ 7q-,37 s5 40 S:t N` 544 2,Z L IM dr We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and j Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use, of our tax dollars than to protect the children of this community. A traff ic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidento- occurring there. Print Name Address Phone # ® -785 L AR Wit l l i l fz 1 65~ - s7zZ, 1 o,a ~o -x-13 Qsss SaL~~ Chr i s~Cen sen l ~d~$S St.J `1(-at'-' T t JarG{ 6o)O -8367 C~rl'sb?7st~, U, 7,/,t`'1 cv V3G7 za i /}v~Q ri- owt25 ~(~(i0 StyoND .$T_ TG~zD 9L~~ ZlGS 'r A- 6 5~~ 23,6 4~zj- rv r. ~2 05 l, P, e-.-- -70 pr 1 S b~ ~cc~avzJ~ Q Z= ~ y( el a7 ? g i We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and ICU Dur-ham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the children of this community. A traff iv signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidents oCcurriii-V ti here. Print Name Address Phone # ~G SG Su' C!Gic~~ ~l 3%n I -G o 3 s'cj 7G t~. /yea. 45120 - G 9 3~ e )6vl f I-, 70 0 CL I c~3~ S w i~'Lks ! T k`e t 3 S-- -77,z5 S~j c. O~ N44 G~La 6A~ SEi s 6-1c -7~~- - ! 0 2 ~2 / X U TG / Nl- 7 NTH 6 Zia - 2' CCY(,_ pelt-, We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can'think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the ir- children of this community. A traff ic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidents occurring there. Print Name Address Phone # -7 S 'W AS F-Cf-c~ ST GO '14 2 70 1- -54`173 76 d-- L~ Div Il ! E CSU S vJ /a s /-1-t''~ -5- 779.2 I v ' JUnf -7-M-16 9 A S+1r c~ S'7 7 Z2 ` 16 2-,1 - L T-0 >:~1 ~UE-~1,3 of ~~.u ~ls;~ q'l~ 2 6 Z4 - t~'Z3 0/41 i4 Pf -7 k~ 2 A-V&4-1~0 17 r7 4, CJ 7,0 Cee2 <77 L/'b Lard-) z-JLjr--SUY2. -t -_7 7 t FM 0 We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and U Durham Road. can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the children of this community. A traffic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of Qlrlr1UG11L~ Vlili 6dl l 1111~~ 11 IGI e. Print Name Address Phone # 01~~n - 66t, A469 r J :::s Oj IC..~ C~a.ru rc ~L,~ 2 <10 :7S as uv~,rcmfek, -vu P14, ~ 7 qS ~ -d -7 7e ~ -7 ;c 1l 77 l l G~ •-7 WWI VO LA-O~ 55 ?on1 ST 5 ~ - ID-71 1( 7G Ss' ~ c " Z, muff M1151319 ON fB We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 78th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the f children of this community. A traff ic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidents occurring them. Print Name Address Phone # a e~•cz `79 s C'l)k ggZ2 ~o L^~ -2 9 91 s l.J . c~.c~ -ch 4 [ ( I/(lc~ 685E--~ b`~ 1j"- KCLr yv 913 41tl,tA~q ~.1 l L-l, (A~v1G~ i'1 ! Z5--2 61 rl -GcZc.i~ Lo LP 8 ¢ - (1 CL?- ~.J G ri~ tstd se,~ c Gi-L L&~~-~U -1932 5 (:n (O8 -`(Iq EUF FNGn 756 S.W. ASa-Cid 2v SS 3S N 11111 ~Ivwij We support the use of city monies to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the children of .his community. A traff ic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of al-%A%Ael Ls Vcc u rril lg LI ler e. Print Name Address Phone # /L1 ~Ur~'L ~w c ISM 5ulCtnvwoo~S C ~n ~~C~ ' SS ~ a'f - 7 sw Av&,73 -6, j," 5S-7 -7)(a / -6: ,s L&pj 4 -7 TIJ -7 3' - yu zv V 4hs~jOdt ~r -SSl~ ~~T~~~ Cp3 q- IYv Z~C) V", e 3 S ti-' 74 I~q - v sl e~o h)4ti Pia lea `79 ii !ill IRWIN I'M OWN pill, IBM We support the use of city monies to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the children of this community. A traffic signal will also regulate traffic and reduce the number of accidents occurring there. Print Name Address Phone # >S7 Stilt-) - S`f- 6Ze -IN30 ZA 'A/Mati X76.96 (5t,) / u, . sZ is Sw sl G Z - svr v s a S Lr/ 1171 7-;5)1eW G 0/0 15~~a s,w, A43to 2- a 'zC 6 C~ oVz~ ~Z/' (/4 , 'V1 '754o sfl aq &39- Joz- Ell c- Kit ~3 I ~~P; . ut~t:aaaa We support the use of city monies to construct a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Load. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the U children of this community. P traffic signal will also regulate traffic and reduce the number of accidents occurring there. Print Name Address Phone # i, r~ur~ 1~vy`U `5V~5ar~ ~Sti` (off' - 9~~ c f7 iii' ~d S, lei raw R C) -5 ~~r I S UJ I Qm rl 62 -5Q 5tj 'D C, yE:~ r i s -r C - 3S~ a k3rl S9 S' l y~~ -,3,W-! i1~G-K 1st/o 5w g/ ST C~r c(-7udf \Jf JOB ~ ~/I, e go UA'( j d%45 j d- ~~L:d Q~itsoti F000 j 36n a~ 106 ~ 3 Z)h f ~5a~ gdv~ 5 w be h e,-(- (ozC~-l~~s~ Z 7 (Pon U va "J 1' We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the 1 chiiaren of this community. A traffic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of accidents occurring. there. Print Name Address Phone # ` /1 G try sw ~ ~3~~ /,3230 06 Aw~- 110 -7 -7 C~~ 7 y.~ S X11 ~ ~v7-!c` ctio~S ~ ~iS~6 v~ CDC a S -7 7-7 5 e- 1)755 • 4 67, S -DcdQaard - 5 CA-) C Abp ~,t r~~ G~ ~~,l~~s C ~2G,~ ZZ ~ S .mss , (E= h1 T C ~ W t) [l~ . ~_,S~ - c • 7 - 1522.0 ~,UJ , .~C, to 152-00 e~;1lc Ooois (fl2c~ -2FsG,~-) MEMO: t We support the use of city monies to construct a traff ic signal at the inierse6tion df 79th Avenue and Durham Road. We can think of no more appropriate use of our tax dollars than to protect the - children of this community. A traff ic signal will also regulate traff ic and reduce the number of 2 accidents occurring there. Print Name Address Phone # do ff K-) R,) t^ ts r r r ~l jt~e7n T,-t-a (0 ~s6 -v -w P7~ `S630 -5 7~ ~ 63`16, a, ' I -5- 7 Nh S&) o6~=c _ /ZO c c~ G, beg r 03 e,-f\e rvt [ l~ ft J~ 7!F Cvf~<7~ -e M-Jd e 6 2 s 1~;Oqgz~- -,S(d r19~lb fz1 - 171LI" > E CS2 /~,6 o S got, 4/ Cl 5- 5 C/ Ile U /1-7 OEM M uA~ ~ r. I I i 1.5.50..5r 79 ~,q-3 ~8 a Co~D-- Ito f -mom . _ i i I i i i ~ ! i I - x i . 1 I I c i { t I i_. JUy 1 1995 J U. of 13 45 May 22, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD w~► +4Tn e"4. q5/cc, CZoo MR. RANDY WOOLEY CITY OF TIGARD 13125 S.W. BALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 Dear Mr.: Wooley, I was very happy that Bill 26-26 passed in last week's election. Personally, I support more parks and/or walking trails. As a concerned citizen, and a homeowner in the Three Mountain Estates development on Bull Mountain, I've been very concerned about the rapid demise of the open green spaces in Tigard. One reason we moved to Bull Mountain was because of the beautiful open green areas. One by one the green and open spaces are disappear- ing. At this rate it won't be long before they're all gone. For a good quality of living for people, there needs to be a certain amount of green open spaces preserved for walking trails and parks. There is an area near our home which has been mentioned for a possible park or part of a walking trail. I would recommend that the City acquire this lana, rather than letting it being sold for more homes to be built on it. The majority of the people in the neighborhood have children and would support the parks system and the taxes for them. They would, I'm sure, prefer to have a park/trail abutting our neighborhood rather than more houses! I believe that the City of Tigard should make funding for this and other acquisitions a priority. Sincerely, A~c . , ,A S , Jacquelyn Tuttle 13621 S.W. Mountain Ridge Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 g- is, i bra*' c r AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of June 13, 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Parking restrictions on Durham Road PREPARED BY; R. Woolev DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Parking restrictions on Durham Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached ordinance prohibiting parking on SW Durham Road between SW 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. INFORMATION SUMMARY When Durham Road was extended east from Upper Boones Ferry Road to 72nd Avenue, the street was designed for no on-street parking, the same as other .ollector streets in the area. The attached ordinance will add this section f road to the list of streets where parking is prohibited, and allow posting of the appropriate signs. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED r FISCAL NOTES The cost of signing the "no parking" zone will be approximately $300 from street maintenance funds. k' /dig rham . sum AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of June 13,_ 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON F COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Parking restrictions on Bonita Road PREPARED BY: R. Woolev DEPT HEAD OK G' CITY ADMIN OK kAAA--- ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Parking restrictions on Bonita Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached ordinance prohibiting parking on Bonita Road. r INFORMATION SUMMARY Like most or our major collector streets, Bonita Road has been designed with no room for parking on the street. With the construction scheduled for this summer, the design will be implemented for all of Bonita Road except at the ailroad crossing. To complete the design plan, we will need to install "no rking" signs on the portions of Bonita not already signed. Current ordinances prohibit parking west of Fanno Creek. The attached ordinance will amend the Code to prohibit parking on all portions of Bonita Road within the City of Tigard. (Note: The ordinance addresses the portion of Bonita east of 83rd. A separate section of the code already addresses the portion west of 83rd.; OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES u The cost of signing the "no parking" zone will be approximately $500 from street maintenance funds. k /bonita.sum Z AGENDA ITEM # E` For Agenda of June 130 1995 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Parking restrictions on North Dakota Street PREPARED BY: R. Woolen DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE.THE COUNCIL Parking restrictions on North Dakota Street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached ordinance prohibiting parking on SW North Dakota Street between Scholls Ferry Road and Springwood Drive. INFORMATION SUMMARY A commercial development is currently under construction on North Dakota Street near Scholls Ferry Road. The project includes completion of street mprovements on North Dakota, including curb and sidewalk. When curbs and. aping are completed, a center turn lane will be markad for the commercial portion of North Dakota between Scholls Ferry and Springwood. In order to mark the center turn lane, parking must be prohibited. This is the typical collector street design in commercial areas. The attached ordinance will establish the required "no parking" zone. The ordinance will affect only the area north of Springwood, where there is no residential frontage. Parking viii still be allowed in the residential. areas. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES The cost of, signing the "no parking" zone will be approximately $400 from street mainenance funds. p 0/-Odak.sum