The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 06/14/1994I A H Revised 6/10/94 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7.15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heal in anv order after Z,.,W P.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD Telecommunications Devices for the Deao. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.1n. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 634-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf}. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 'l TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING - JUNE 14, 1994 AGENDA • STUD( MEETING (6:30 PM) • Review of Consolidated Billing of Water and Sewer Services • Agenda Review 1. BUSINESS MEETING; (7:30 PM) 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an Rem be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Receive and File: Council Calendar 4. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 94-0001 ZONE CHANGE ZON 94-0001 NATIONAL RTGAGEIBULL MOUNTAIN ROAD LOCATION: The south side of SW Bull Mountain Road, two and three parcels west of the intersection of SW Bull Mountain Road and SW Pacific Highway (VVCTM 2S1 10AC, tax lots 1100 and 1200). To amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for two parcels which are currently designated Professional Commercial and General Commercial to Medium- High density residential with an R-25 zoning designation. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, 18.56, 18.62, and 18.64; Comprehensive Plan Policies, 1.1.2, Implementation Strategies 2, Policies 2.1.1,2.1.2.,2.1.3,3.1.1,4.2.1,5.1.1,5.1.4,6.1.1,6.3.1,6.3.2,6.3.3,6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.3, 12.1.1, and 12.2.1; Statewide Planning Goals. 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12. ZONE: The proposed R-25 zoning is to provide for single- family attached and low to medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium- high density residential development. Existing zoning district C-P is to provide for groups of businesses and offices in centers, and C-G provides sites for major retail goods and services. a. Open Public Hearing b: Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony Proponents Opponents - Rebuttal e. Staff Recommendation f. Council questions/oamwaft g, Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 944.2= COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 2 0 5. MON-AGENDA ITEMS 5.1 Local Contract Review Board: Award Construction Contract for the Park/Watkins Shoulder Improvements to Kerr Contractors 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 182.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 7. ADJOURNMENT coaM14.94 V 0 COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 3 Council Agenda Item 2 ! I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 Meeting was called to order at 6:34 p.m. by Council President Hunt. 1. ROLL CALL Council Present: Cou_ncil President Paul Hunt; Councilors Wendi Conover Hawley, Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner; Mary Gruss, Accounting Supervisor; Wayne Lowry, Finance Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; Randy Volk, Operations Manager; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. STUDY SESSION Review of consolidated billing of water and sewer services. Finance Director Lowry updated Council on the history of the billing process as a transition between the Tigard Water District over to the City of Tigard. City of Tigard is now in the stage of merging from the old Tigard Water District into a consolidated billing with City of Tigard sewer and water services. Changes are proposed to be implemented on July 1, 1994, which would mean customers will be receiving a consolidated billing of water and storm sewer and sanitary sewer services after that date. Mr. Lowry also reviewed the fact that the City is billing for water services for King City, Durham, and unincorporated areas. It was noted that there is an area of the City of Tigard which is being serviced by the Tualatin Valley Water District. The Tualatin Valley Water District residents receive billings from Tigard for sanitary and storm sewer services only. Key changes for customers as of July 1 include the following: - Type of bill - letter-size/return envelope versus postcard. - Bill frequency - bi-monthly, versus monthly. - Pro-rated solid waste storm sewer calculations will be by the day versus the month. - Storm water and sanitary sewer consumption rate will be based on winter-average water usage versus flat fee. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 1 Entity billed may change based on who pays for water. Limited control over sewer charge. Finance Director Lowry reviewed the consumption based sewer charges (see Council packet for material distributed, which explains this item in more detail). There was discussion on impacts to customers and questions and answers by Council to staff for clarification on customer service related concerns. Finance Directory Lowry advised two temporary employsem will be hired for July through September to help with customer service .issues. Accounting Supervisor Gruss reviewed the billing process. (For highlights of her presentation, please see material distributed to Council which has been filed with the council meeting packet). Review of quasi-judicial and legislative public hearing process. Legal Counsel Ramis reviewed two types of land use procedures legislative and quasi-judicial. Mr. Ramis highlighted the differences between the two types of hearings. In a quasi- judicial hearing, Council acts in a capacity as "judge." In a legislative public hearing process, council procedure is different in that the action they take will have a broad- based, general effect for the entire City; Councilors may be approached by persons lobbying for a particular ideal. It would be inappropriate for people to lobby Councilors on a quasi-judicial matter; however, if this should happen, it would not necessarily prohibit a Councilor from participating in deliberations. The Councilor, if he or she should encounter ex parte contact, should declare the nature of the contact and advise whether he or she can deliberate the matter without bias. If the Councilor feels he or she has a bias in a quasi-judicial matter, he or she should remove themselves from the deliberations. Discussion followed with Council questions and comments. It was noted that on the Public Hearing under Item No. 4 for this agenda, it would be more clear to remove the word "comments" in Item F of the public hearing script. Council comments should be held until after close of the public hearing during Council Consideration. Legal Counsel Ramis advised a video tape of the land use hearing process is available in the Administration office for use by Council members. Legal Counsel Ramis also reviewed the definition of a conflict of interest. go I CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 2 Council meeting recessed at 7:35 p.m. Council meeting reconvened at 7:44 p.m. BYJSINBSS MEETING There were no Council liaison reports. Council President called for Non-Agenda Items: City Administrator Reilly advised there was one non-agenda item from staff : 5.1 Local Contract Review Board - Award construction contract for the Park/Watkins shoulder improvements to Kerr contractors. 2. VISITOR'S AGM4DA• Bert Black, 13410 SW Village Glen Court, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. Mr. Black spoke in support of the funding for the arts, specifically Broadway Rose Theater. He noted the benefits his family has received from participating in the theater during the summer. He advised this provides children with summer jobs and noted it also gave an opportunity to showcase Tigard talent. • Tianna Hubbenette, 960 Travis Court, Sherwood, Oregon, 97140. Ms. Hubbenette advised she also participated in the Broadway Rose community theater; this has been very beneficial to her personally. She recounted her successes including friendships formed and personal recognition and honors which she attributed, in part, to her involvement in the arts. • Sharon Maroney advised she donated her time to Matthew Ryan to speak during the Visitor's Agenda. Matthew Ryan, 15960 SW Roshak Road, Tigard, Oregon, 97224 advised he was the producer of the Broadway Rose Theater. He appealed to the Tigard City Council to fund the arts in Tigard. He related two stories, including his own personal story, of how this participation was instrumental in helping young people to become productive, stay in school, and out of trouble. Mr. Ryan also read a letter from a student of the theater who related how the theater had helped him personally. He noted summer programs such, as sports and arts help keep kids busy and off the streets. 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 3 • Marge Johnson, 11156 SW 130th, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. Ms. Johnson thanked the City for the recently-constructed footbridge in the. Summerlake Park area. Ms. Johnson then noted her concerns with proposed transportation improvements for flow-through traffic by connecting 130th and Winterlake Drive. She said the connection of this road will magnify problems and increase traffic through this neighborhood. She urged City Council to review the validity of such a connection and the $40,000 specified for design of this connection. Council Discussion - Councilor Hawley requested clarification of the status of the arts policy. After discussion, it was agreed Council would look through the brochures distributed to them at the meeting last week. Council would let staff know their ideas to help formulate a proposed policy. This item will be placed on an agenda for a Council goal setting session. In response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, Mr. Ryan advised that in order to obtain a .matching grant, they would need to know whether they would receive any funding from Tigard by July 7. With regard to the 130th traffic study, City Administrator Reilly advised the traffic study would be completed in July. 3. CONSMU AGENDA• 0 3.1 Receive and File: Council Calendar Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to approved the Consent Agenda. Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. City Administrator Reilly noted for the record that the council Orientation meeting is scheduled for June 22, 6:30 p.m. at the Tigard Water Building. 4. P[7BLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - COMPREHENSI" PLAN ANT _CPA 94-0001 ZONE CHANGE ZON 94-0001 NATIONAL MORTGAGE O AIN ROAD A. Public hearing was opened. B. Declarations or challenges: Council President Hunt asked whether any members of Council wished to report any, ex parte Contact or information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits. There were none. All Council members indicated they had familiarized themselves with the application. 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 4 There were no challenges from the audience pertaining to Council°s jurisdiction to hear this matter, nor were there any challenges on the participation of any member of Council. C. Staff report - Note: Just prior to the Staff Report, Council President Hunt advised the following: - For all those wishing to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the Council and parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be directed toward the criteria that staff will describe or other criteria in the plan, or land use regulation which you believe apply to the decision. Senior Planner Bewersdorff summarized the staff report. He reviewed a map of the area on the overhead projector. Council asked clarifying questions of the staff report, with the following items noted: • The decision on the Dolan case could affect some of the requirements on this particular land use with regard to bicycle and pedestrian improvements. • The Oregon Department of Transportation is requiring shoulder pathways at this time, not bike pathways. • It was noted there is a service road which runs parallel to SW Pacific. Highway, also on this property. Traffic from future development of this property would exit onto Bull Mountain Road, not to Pacific Highway. • When the type of development is known, drainage issues will have to be reviewed and dealt with. • Legal Counsel Ramis, in response to concerns by Councilor Scheckla, noted the City could attached conditions to access and egress, depending on whether the evidence shows this should be done. • In response to a question from Councilor Hunt, Senior Planner Bewersdorff advised a civic building is a conditional use in a multi-family zoning district. (includes lodges and fraternal organizations). 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1394 - PAGE 5 D. Public testimony. op car. : Mark Whitlow, 222 SW Columbia, Portland, Oregon, testified as Legal Counsel on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Whitlow reviewed what he thought were the most pertinent issues before Council. Mr. Whitlow distributed the following items to City Council: • A map of the area, showing the current zoning. • Chapter 18.22 of the TMC. • Chapter 18.62 of the TMC. • Chapter 18.64 of the TMC. Mr. Whitlow advised there will be another public hearing for site development review. He requested Council wait for the development proposal before conditions were imposed. Mr. Whitlow requested he be given rebuttal time. In response to a question from Councilor Hawley, Senior Planner Bewersdorff advised he was not sure if the area included a state highway right-of-way which would encompass the frontage road. Mr. Whitlow advised that ODOT may have plans for closure of the frontage road. Mr. Rick Givens, Planning Resources, Inc., and Mr. Whitlow, Legal Counsel for applicant, advised they relied on the staff report for matters of content with regard to this application. Mr. Givens reviewed the history of the zoning for this area. He advised that because of the slope, professional offices would be difficult to develop. He noted that multi-family zoning seems to fit well with the market and character of the area. Mr. Givens referred to a map and described possible transportation configurations. Mr. Givens advised this use would not significantly impact nearby single-family residential areas. He noted that public facilities were available, including sanitary sewers and water. He described the storm drainage problems; however, he said storm drainage should not be a limiting factor. He noted that a certain amount of open space for drainage will be included. CITY COUNCIL MEETING. MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 6 Mr. Givens, advised this location was convenient to Amok transit park and ride facilities. There is a need for apartments in this area. A Washington County study noted a low multi-family vacancy rate which indicates there is a need for rental housing. This will, he advised, increase as single-family home prices escalate-and affordable housing is needed. Mr. Givens advised there is' a metro requirement to provide a mix of housing of 50% multi-family and 50% single-family. He also advised the City is currently meeting their overall density requirements of ten units per acre, with a current figure of 10.2 units per acre. This change to multi-family units will provide a little extra cushion in that number. With regard to public comments, Mr. Givens advised two neighborhood meetings were held on this issue. The comments were mixed. The predominant concern was traffic. He advised this project does not have as much traffic impact as would a development farther up Bull Mountain Road. Mr. Givens referred to the traffic engineer study performed by Robert Keech (a copy of this traffic study is on file with the Council packet material). Mr. Givens noted the traffic generated for the proposed use would be 30 to 50 percent less than comparable commercial offices as it is currently zoned. The change will result in an improvement with regard to volume of traffic from what could be expected if developed as a commercial site. James Nicoli, 9025 SW Center Street, Tigard, Oregon, advised he was testifying on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Nicoli advised the chamber was interested in property next to that owned by National Mortgage Company. The Chamber of Commerce was in favor of the proposed change. He advised traffic was the biggest concern in the immediate area, Mr. Nicoli referred to the traffic report, which shows that a commercial office complex would draw far more traffic than a multi-family use. Mr. Nicoli advised the property slope is excessive and it would be difficult to develop commercial property to meet the new ADA requirements. 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 7 Mark Padgett, 11270 SW 95th, Tigard, Oregon, testified on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. He has reviewed the ordinance and felt that all applicable State goals had been met. He noted he felt there had been a substantial change in conditions. Mr. Padgett also noted traffic generation would be reduced, should the property be developed multi-family versus commercial. Bev Froude, 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road, advised she would rather not have this property developed, but realized this would not be possible. She noted all of the traffic would be exiting onto Bull Mountain Road. At the present time, there is no use of the right turn lane during rush hour because of stacking up of long lines of traffic. She requested careful planning be done to make sure exits are placed for safety and that roads interconnect. She noted the different uses at this location, and advised that with the Chamber using the building, this would cause additional traffic. She advised that this was the time to put in conditions to assure safety. • Betty Polson, 14400 SW McFarland, Tigard, Oregon, advised she opposed any impacts on schools. She said more apartments would mean more children and the schools would be more overcrowded. She advised the recent bond measure proposal from the Tigard/Tualatin School District did not pass. There will be no new school for the area. She noted more tenants would further impact community services, such as police and fire. Ms. Polson advised tenants in apartment buildings do not pay real estate taxes. Rents collected from apartment buildings do not cover the cost of education of the children. In response to a question by Councilor Hunt, Legal Counsel Ramis explained the state legislation which requires coordination with school districts and local governments. School districts are required to submit plans and cooperate in developing local government Comprehensive Plans. This is an element of long-term planning and would not be applicable in a situation such as this. With regard to service delivery, services for such things as fire and police follow development and are not a pre-condition to development. It is the responsibility of the local government to make sure services are adequate. Sewer, water, and streets must be adequate before approval of development. CITY C®UNOL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 8, • Larry Choruby, 16060 SW Colony Place, Tigard, Oregon, said he had lived in the Bull Mountain area for 16 years and has lived. in the Tigard area for 26 years. He advised development at this point on Bull Mountain Road would be a tremendous burden on traffic and noted his concerns. He also advised of his concerns on,the impact to schools and the worsening situation for dollars and classroom space. He urged Council to reject the proposal because of these issues. Rebuttal: Mark Whitlow advised traffic studies have shown there is capacity at the intersection. He urged Council to impose conditions at the next step when it is known what the development would be, how many buildings, etc. The maximum number of units for this site would be 93, based on estimates. He advised the impacts would be less than what a commercial development would create. He said those who wished that Council deny this application hope that nothing would come by way of development or that a moratorium be placed on building on this area • Mr. Bob Keech, Engineer, testified on specifics of the traffic study. Mr. Keech advised the study reviewed the projected figures for proposed zoning and current zoning. He noted that for the proposed zoning there is ample capacity, as well as ample capacity available should a commercial development occur. Mr. Keech advised his analysis is general, because there was no site plan yet developed. He also took other issues into consideration, such as future growth. Mr. Keech noted a left turn lane would be necessary at the access point. 85% of the existing traffic flow exiting out of the residential areas go east to Pacific Highway. Legal Counsel Ramis, in response to a question from Councilor Hunt with regard to procedure, advised that public testimony ends with applicant rebuttal. Mr. Ramis said that if either side feels there is new evidence presented, they may ask the record be left open for seven days, or to ask for a continuance of the hearing. E. Staff recommendation: Senior Planner Bewersdorff said staff recommended approval, noting the application met all review criteria and standards. 4D CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 9 Following comments were noted by Council: Councilor Scheckla questioned whether the light at the foot of Bull Mountain Road could remain green longer, to help with traffic flow. Senior Planner Bewersdorff noted ODOT, as part of the review process, would be notified with recommendations. Councilor Scheckla questioned whether there would be adequate buffer between the development and Pacific Highway, and also whether there would be a park in the area for young people. Senior Planner Bewersdorff noted the development will have to include a certain amount of open space. There is no public park plans in the vicinity. Two to three hundred feet of open space is required, plus 20% of the area must be landscaped. Senior Planner Bewersdorff advised ODOT has not suggested a widening of Pacific Highway at this vicinity at this time. F. Public hearing was closed. G. Council consideration: • Councilor Hawley noted the applicants had met. the Comprehensive Plan policies and requirements, and she would vote in favor of the zone change. She said she would like to reserve, in some way, an option for further consideration of traffic issues. She also noted concerns with schools, but advised she as a Councilor was not allowed to refuse development, based on school capacity. Councilor Rohlf advised that the applicant had done a good job of meeting the Code requirements. He was concerned about traffic; however, conditions can be imposed during the review of the land use application to.address the traffic issues. Based on the evidence, he advised that he felt he must vote to approve the zone change. Councilor Scheckla advised there was no way he felt he could deny this application for the zone change. He noted the traffic is a concern. He expressed further concern that the Chamber of Commerce was hoping to locate at this site because it would generate more traffic. He stated that when the site development review stage was before Council, traffic concerns would be addressed at that time. 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 10 He said further traffic surveys should be completed, but there was no reason not to allow the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to go forward at this time. Council President Hunt advised his concerns were much the same as those expressed by his fellow Councilors. He noted the traffic engineer was hired by the applicant and thus, there was some possibility the figures could be interpreted to their advantage. He noted he would go along with the rest of Council and vote for approval. He cautioned the developer that he would look hard at what the traffic situation would be on the site development plan. Councilor Hawley advised that in response to concerns expressed by Councilor Scheckla and Council President Hunt, she did not believe there was a great deal of traffic generated by the persons who were using the Chamber of Commerce building. • Legal Counsel Ramis noted that during the site development process, traffic capacity and safety criterion must be met. Councilor Hawley also advised she thought the change in circumstances had been shown. H. Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Ordinance No. 94-12: ORDINANCE NO. 94-12 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REQUESTED BY THE NATIONAL MORTGAGE COMPANY (CPA 94-0001, ZON 94-0001) Motion passed by unanimous vote of Council present (Council President Hunt and Councilors Hawley, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.") 5. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 5.1 City Administrator Reilly summarized the staff report. Councilor Hawley made the declaration that she knew the owners of Kerr Contractors, but that she had no bias with regard to this agenda item. ` 0 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 11 I Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to accept the staff recommendation to award the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Kerr Contractors, Inc. for the Park/Watkins shoulder improvements project. Notion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 6. MOCUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session-at 9:34 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 7. Apag RNHEXT: 9: 5 5 p. Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City. ecorder , City of T Date : Q a =0614.94 40 CITY COUNCIL MEE IING MINUTES - JUNE 14, 1994 - PAGE 12 U AML 0 O1 r` C ~ Vy ~ O Ix e o ~Ow _H c N,. .U "7 d c" 4 . f _ern ~ C E-4 w c- t') Z 0 Y• 0 Q ta) z U m O it co O I L L ch , ~q L-L LLJ E- t V 14 z~ i z ® !a' aW U 0 LU 2 V_ ® ® i Z ' Q . W q W \Y 8® o co m Cl) 0 m O M d N v rd O 4 to t3l - x aa) Ei 3 0 4-4 U) ° Ln W >1 cq rd 4-) '-•I tr rl' M •r1 rl Fi e e U ~ SOS ~ mc~1 •S"S x®~4, •3 33 ~1= t'O*t e0~ Q:. Q ~ ~ ~ `,.j" t`r' ~C ~ IDS t~ 4-e,611 , 1 cc7 . y~ Q. ; •e9 rr; : ri t'+j _ H }4 Q Cis L) c Z, So en a ; W or%, CA ~ (1 'a a C ±cwas' aeo3~e'6?N>~: a Qj C3.~ y tD t~ O P-0 O 0000 - e~ .~.qa.~O~~ , '68 cd W y C, Z N ` p~ E `s c z B p 'v a~'i a ~oo• ^9~' r"i N a>i i o vws CD 7 i a a E .r ~6 V3 c an F+ ' .-j w c ~y r 0 C- U) K' O U_ CT. C) 4 P ' ~J V a) N to 41 td s C~0L e e Z o, C co) s e m Q1 0 a A U N C - CL p o O ro C* e Q J C0 - D ,C Ca l ® 2 o co «e Ca m .,4 ca e C * CL U. co 20 O c.H ° ° ( D 7 75 E-1 O W- sr Z CD W > 2 0 m V SJ W Q y y w C W C7 ~4 O ® a W L U (D O e ® u) ® U c= . m. Z 3 e ° O LL Q O r C7d 0 3. w aw CO c a~i m w =i Z 0 CL 0 0 U. .0 0 0 (D (D O 'J LZ CLW M O Cf a ,m L4 7 U z 00 e®e. O 0, 0 O e p ® O c 0 ° W 0 X 0 _ c0 ° . ei+o 0 IV 0 0 r C, ON r-I s O 3 a~ 'O e O N e O rA m O 0 N m CL x W e O E a • . rlps m { O r tLY ~ E Q W ®J Z r ty . ~ o V v G z v~ c~ ~ U o Q LLJ m 0 O o o v • L O U lu C ~ i Z 00 ® J m z H 0 'aW 13 0 V LLI 0 z ¢ 0 Z w am ~ - ~ ~ ~ N~~ r~w,~ ':Y ~.~';~y T~y'~°L"ice 17 W 'MCA ClY ~N. CCI _ ~ GAT 446L N co 1 N • y~~ F10, team 0! F4 0 IP'f Cp N b aoWN4 ui cc lac IQ~ 2 m C) tr +I ~ ;s l .g 1 ¢ -JZd m7v x ► i i' ~y ! : ~o ..i' il: Z a z 1~: Z X O 00 m 00 d . an d ro C-4 aC%4 ® ca Cal p~ q (a '-I O E :3: O O LO CO rC; 4-) 1 I tT •rl M •r~ W 1--10 0 Z O Q U J D CL U. AA ® z 0) LL Z - X: U. 0 d W O LL U. O 0,4 w d-) r(s w I .O r ca - 0) . ID >4- - p CD to ft Cl) Q~ U Q E E j o c° to c t0. m W r X O ~ : e 0 ;or =OE-4 E m 0 o a` C V U O (D r al) . Co CL c '0 cO ~ O ~W a- O Evc~n r CD = 0 0c®mcrl 3 CL- -0 AdJ O =:J a o O ca o U M Ov co E `oq~a im 0 r- L- 0) - -0 ou o 0 ® 0 a0 .0 m a6 ® mom] o !.^le 1-i v O h @ 4•I O > U ra o rn 2 m E c 0 N 'o c 0 m A m co a x W Q .S2 > E U U. 4 11 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed CL_ -1 9 ° P STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, begin first duly sworn, on oath, depose and y: 40 That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number (s) which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated f copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being her to attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the day of 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. West One Bank, 12260 SW Main Street, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and SW Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon ;La-I Subscribed and sworn to before me this OFFICIAL SEAL hi. JOANN HAYES NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.006513 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 5, "1995 z 3'a. day of -}V\ -,~Q 4L. Notary P is for Oregon My Commission Expires: hrm S" 14R.'' r F i Iogin\jo\affpod A";~~~Y A~ " 4... V{SiT?R'S AGENDA ~ATE•Liil lC3®. (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) 0 Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on rather issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC - STAFF CONTACTED ~ !~✓l N. A.Iey J ~J ~L. C1'`~ 4roO (ealUs r4 1, zrw=o 771'10 ~ 2 S a r o \ M ct g`a is -c W Tr e 6. 4 h:\Iogin\(o\vlsHom.sht 0 Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount 0of time each person has to spear. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. ftl i .~lUnE3'''~~. 0 .:s ANO PUBLIC HgARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-0001 ZONE CHANGE ZON 94-0001 NIAIIAN9AP MORTGAGEIBULL MOUNTAIN ROAD LOCATION: The south side of SW Bull Mountain Road, two and three parcels west of the intersection of SW Bull Mountain Road and SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 10AC, tax lots 1100 and 1200). To amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map for two parcels which are currently designated Professional Commercial and General Commercial to Medium-High density residentiai with an R-25 zoning designation. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, 18.56, 18.62, and 18.64; Comprehensive Plan Policies, 1.1.2, Implementation Strategies 2, Policies 2.1.1, 2.1.2., 2.1.3, 3.1.1, 4.2.1, 5.1<1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.3.1, 6.3:2, 6.3.3, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.3, 12. 1. 1, and 12.2.1; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12. ZONE: The proposed R-25 zoning is to provide for single-family attached and low to medium rise multiple-family residential units for medium- high density residential development. Existing zoning district C-P is to provide for groups of businesses and offices in centers, and C-G provides sites for major retail goods and services. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEE'T'S 51 kx , Afa ~a w rrr:s -PLEASE PRIN ;=fix; Ll lei L( - HANDHELD METER READERS: • Currently on a weekly meter reading cycle vs. a bi-monthly reading cycle • Customer billing period continues to be bi-monthly BILLING CYCLE: • 55 day billing cycle • 21 days Meter read to due date 23 days Due date to urgent notice 10 days Urgent notice to door hanger 1 day Door hanger to turnoff 55 days • Possible to pay in two installments within 55 day billing cycle • Allowing customer to pay beyond the 55 day billing cycle reduces collection on accounts should problems arise COLLECTION PROCEDURE: • Dollars applied: 1 st to sewer 2d to storm drain 3rd to water • Water service turned off if bill is not paid in full by the end of the billing period (55 days) • Collection agency used for unpaid final bills > 30 days past due 0 DELINQUENT SEWER/STORM DRAIN ACCOUNT BALANCES: • . Approximately • Letter sent to: • Homeowner • Tenant • Landlord • Installment agreement • Turn, over to County with signed authorization • Collection agency for nonresponding customers 0 23 s Row Will The New Rates Compare Sewer .Billing Method With The Old? Households which use less will receive bills To `change July 19 1994 for less; consequently, households which use more will be billed more. M rH..s~h old 1 Uad e Total Monthly Mnthly C h arge Sewer Use $0.90 Per CCF* Bill 3 CCF• $13.25 $2.70 $15.95 4 CCF $13.25 $3.60 $16.85 5 CCF $13.25 $4.50 $17.75 6 CCF $13.25 $5.40 $18.65 ."'!CCF $13.25 56.30 $19.55 **8CCF $13.25 $7.20 $20.45 **9 CCF $13.25 $8.10 $21.35 10 CCF $13.25 $9.00 $22.25 11 CCF $13.25 $9.90 $23.15 *CCF = 100 cubic feet **'ITypical single family households will likely fall into this range of monthly water use. For More Information Contact: Unified Sewerage Agency Public Affairs 155 N..First Ave., Suite 270 Hillsboro, OR 97124 (503) 648-8621 l~ Your bill will decrease e or increase depending on your sewer usage. For many months now the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and the 12 cities within urban Washington County have been notifying then customers of the change to "Consumption Based Sewer Rates." This means that instead of paying a flat fee, your sanitary sewer bill will more closely reflect the amount of wastewater that goes down your drains. Why the Change? The goal is fairness. Many customers have requested this change in order to have more control over their sewer bill. This method is more fair because it ties customers' usage of the sani- tary sewer system to their bills. Customers can control a portion of their bills by lowering their usage of the system. You pay for what you use. like Other Utilities After July 1, 1994, your sanitary sewer charge will be broken into two categories: a base charge and a sanitary sewer use charge. The base charge is a fee to cover some of the system's fixed costs. The use charge is based on winter water usage. Your Sewer Charges Now Flat Newer Charge = 100 % Your Sewer Charges A, f $er July I Sewer Use Charge = 35% Sewer Base Charge = 65% fee based on water usage fee to cover fixed costs Calculating Your New Seaver Rate You can get an.estimate of what your new sewer bill will be by using this worksheet to calculate your monthly bill. Step 1. Find a Recent V hater Bill it is important that it be within the Novem- ber-April winter period. (We're using winter use so we do not charge you for irrigation, etc.) Step 2. Find Your Monthly Water Usage Look for the column that says "consump- tion" or "usage." It is measured in CCF (100 cubic feet). (Line 1) Total CCF Used = E Step 3. Determine How Often You Are Billed Are you billed for water monthly or bi-monthly? (If you are billed bi-monthly, divide line one by 2 to get your monthly usage.) (Line 2) Total CCF Used Monthly = E=D Step 4. Calculate Your Monthly Sewer Usage Multiply your total CCF winter average usage (line 2) x $0.90 (Line 3) My Estimated Usage Charge = Step 5. Add Your Base Charge Add your base charge of $13.25 per month. (Line 4) My Estimated Sewer Charge Per Mouth = Your bill will be recalculated each year using the previous winter's water usage. The base charge of x;13.25 is for single family dwelling units(I)Us). For businesses, find the total number of DUs on your sewer bill for your estimate. qW.. i.. .7 P-1} ~ Vli .4••.v~.♦i'.w NHWh Y~_ W\#.+rt~ < f'"l i^a - ;xr P xr t Co LA.r 1.~, t ~ See REVERSE SIDE For CODES/PENALTIES Phone: 639-4171 SEWER/SURFACE WATER FEE BILLING STATEMENT CITY OF TIGARD • 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TGARD, OR 97223-0059 FORWARDING AND ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED PRESORTED FIRST CLASS MAIL US POSTAGE PAID PORTLAND, OR j PERMIT NO. 2528 PLEASE RETURN THIS STUB WITH PAYMENT. ACCCUNT NO. 9371108CA ACCOUNT NO: 93711C€CA SERVICE C4/C1/94 TO -40/3C/94 FOR SERVICE Al: AV SEWER SURFACE IKTR FEE 3•CC PAYMENT DUE 05/15/94 SERVICE CHARGE CO MISCELLANEOUS CC PREVIOUS BALANCE CC TOTAL DUE 23.5C TCTAL DUE - 3 . 5 0 WILLIAMSf H 11 COC SW .121 ST AVE TIGARDi OF 97223-3270 H CITY OF TIGARD OF T, WATER DEPARTMENT 8777 SW BURNHAM STREET P. O. BOX 230000 WART EW TIGARD, OREGON 97281-1999 ' (503) 639-1554 or (503) 639-4171 AMOUNT PAID IF OTHER THAN TOTAL AMOUNT DUE MALLARD LAKES HOMEOWNERS MARK PHIFER 14780 SW 91ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT NAME MALLARD LAKES HOME'O4dNERANCCOUNTNO. 6201,81-1 SERVICE LOCATION POND ON SW 91ST CT TYPE OF I RR SERVICE FROM 04/14/1994 TO 06/06/1.994 SERVICE `METER READINGr srs USAGE IN T `~Od'CU FT ' 2208 2240 32 LAST YEARS WATER CONSUMPTION N/A SAME BILLING PERIOD ANY AMOUNT 30 DAYS PAST DUE IS SUBJECT TO TURN OFF KEEP THIS PORTION ACCOU 1TfN0 "nl1E'pATE 3OT6l:AM01:l 6201811 06/29%1'994 53.07 WATER BILLING,,. SC9DE, :AMOUNTS 7.65 MIN 12.42 WCAM 33.00 CURRENT BILLING 5 3 • 0 7 PREVIOUS BALANCE LESS PAYMENTS RECEIVED 2 3 . 4 7 2 3 4 7 oTaL ~I~~~uNT ouE 5 3 .0 7 MORE INFORMATION V) Cd -14 U-0 0 • a 3 n c 4-- C4 0 bq 3 o y G2. . p cn `a' V cCry CJ^ jsrr v? 6D-. Cd O .O. G O 'p O'v.. ' 04 . O 3 p "C "t N ca U "rte b > CA t4 00 0 C4-1 U. w 03 Z. TV v o U 4 O C~~c1 CIS i 3 t I. eq 00 cn r- Q) co 0 A .b 3 y v e o r. L fi air 0 n o~ 'G ® O y In C.) y = 3 wO o :v 'ts ?a J} 2bA T9 C a.. a;-34 i cn Lr, y v _ oo v cy yy v L7 J O M 'ca CJ n "'v03 ~ ^ . G 3> Q y N y rn r- 41 QW) S, ~i 1V1--]~ Q Gay O. O 1: ° bb v ~ y~j a~~i \ r0` vii N F+ U' f~. cry C~ U P. 3 W 0 r fr - O N 0 C3 Z,D Q p ~ ~ .0 U r U ~ C's 0 cts su. Q va a~H 3 3. > cn acs w N 0 0 > cc L4 a`i r'+ O cn II~ O ° N DA 3 a n E c ~ U i V o y w w 0 C4-. b4 "a 0 W as a~ t4:;. W3 y o cry ° x, Cs] i o a a, i v CA 0 as to t y~ 8 O0 E 00 n d V > 0 ca o a .o a o 3 A Cl w a~ ai p' cry ci O 44 a +c.' O CJJ bb i- ter N va O v~v~~ r ov,-4 it O ti Q cH •p •dl N .Ll N~ .ate ' U y 'O U O W ~SOd ~1 0 -0 U U cn U tea).. [ t1. h •3 c v ~ p o As ' b C's p~.'• _ Cdd Y a c C s C O°-414~ 3 c a ~ a~ ~ >F': 'C! m C F '~:-va N.r. O a) > c > a~ C's o 0 i p ~ e ^ m . °O. w O" • I~ b ca u. ~ c 3 a. 1.10 a) >s 0 o ~ Q . o (D N o0 3 I.A v > C N • W Y O ` o W 0 o C's 0 0. Y c y CA 0 N O cn 6q to O v i cqM. c o C 25 !s ) c p > O r y cli CA c n 0 W) Y O v . c 0 3 a) o o c~ > O G C. o C13 S. `Y T.~ ° v T ° c`~ M O v o a) 3 40. c c p o cl G~ on ° n Ew C) 00 Y 41) O 1 (D Cd ® on 3 to cl C) > .0 co U c Sn cs C w. •v o C w ~ ~ p ~J • p ~ c~ e, . H o u cT ari i `0.5b z. C N N to > Q: U r, co c L) CI- , 0 h a) w c's c p O a) C b ..r O U L o c .c oo t~, , o 3 ° _ ° • 00 her ❑ o T d i. it a) 0 C) 0 On Od O b a> . "C i . ~n .r bD1 L'a M o a b 3 .U o w N 00 \0 y a) i ai i o 3 r U4.) o 11 3 0 to ° ° ai oro a~i cs o o o to co -o _ - 0 i. tc q cs 4) c' bo N c U y r C7 L 'C T cA 00 - •O ~I I v O O U p U 3 ~y U c > p o. 3 U 0 00 o~ uN rn J] cn ~ O O 7 c3 = t.. .G L cC p-~.• Z u3 •C O C D y O O II I °a w U O cu U _ C~ ~C •rJ 'c~ y LL ~ m y p N J . E-: 11 :Ifj 0 14) 0 c= abi ° 3 c ? o w > c' v y c U w h ~o 4 y 2 U ~ v c c U o 0 3 o J ` a o -I p i o~ U ct " L E- _ r h co a) 0 a) O d O V •.S 41, c `a c w cOa a) o aUi U y r o o v I o04/0 O o O >N O Q z b y 7 V O V L v u rn ! I ~ o"i on v ''7 o. ,tea), r' w .C S ` w o 0 at. U w " Q 0 .d 3 N O c. K; a) r~ -t N Sri .,a :r O 0. to cn 0 ZZ: ° ° c~ w C7 s n CLO o°o s C tr - n¢ * ti o H Council Agenda Item 3,f MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator DATE:,. June 6, 1994 SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, June, 1994 - August, 1994 Regularly scheduled council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. . June 7 Tues Special Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting * 14 Tues Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting * 21 Tues Council Study Meeting Joint Meeting with CIT Facilitators (6:30) Joint Meeting with Planning Commission (7:30) * 28 Tues Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting July 4 Mon 4th of July Holiday - City Offices Closed * 12 Tues Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting * 19 Tues Council Study Meeting (6:30) * 26 Tues Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting August * 9 Tues Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting * 16 Tues Council Study Meeting (6:30) * 23 Tues Council Meeting (6:30 p.m.) Study Session Business Meeting h:\login\cachy\cccat COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 14, 1994 DATE SUBMITTED: June 1, 1994 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance, PREVIOUS ACTION: PC Hrg 4-18-94 Final Order and Findin s CPA 94-0001, ZON 94-0001 PARED BY:Bewersdorff,Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN O_ REQUESTED BY:Bewersdorff Should t-he City Council approve the attached ordinance, final order and findings to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map to redesignate a 4.13 acre parcel and a .53 acre parcel from Commercial Professional and General Commercial to Medium High Density Residential with an R-25 zoning designation? INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed amendment is for two parcels which are the second and third parcels south and west of the intersection of SW Bull Mountain Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant previously held a neighborhood meeting on this request on March 17, 1994. The 40 Planning Commission recommended approval of the application at its April 18, 1994 meeting. The attached ordinance and findings incorporates that decision. The City Development Code requires that the City Council hold a public hearing prior to making a final decision. The proposed amendment is to allow the property to ultimately be developed for multiple family purposes. The property has not developed with the existing zoning designation. The change adds area for additional housing without adversely affecting the City's commercial land inventory. The existing restaurant building may be incorporated into a multi-family development or be redeveloped for a civic use such as the Chamber of Commerce. An itemized list of the applicant's submittals is attached. The material is available at the public hearing or upon request. PROPOSED ALTERNNEIVES 1. Approve the attached ordinance, final order and findings. 2. Revise the attached ordinance, final order and findings. 3. Deny, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request. FISCAL NOTES No direct impacts. 0 An itemized List Of Application Submittals 1. A proposal description detailing the reasons for the request. 2. A complete traffic study evaluating the impacts to the area based on a hypothetical 93 lot subdivision. The traffic study is on file with the City Recorder and is available for review upon request. • C~Gt~GeC Ffrr~ (r11`~r~~t~ KEECH ASSOCIA TES, INC. Consulting Traffic Engineers 1225 N.W. Murray Blvd., Suite 206 Portland, Oregon 97229-5552 - (503)641-6333 FAX (503)643-8866 March 3, 1994 Rick Givens {Fax: (503) 653-9095) 6564 SE Lake Road Milwaukie, OR 97222 RE: Bull Mountain Road Near SW 1 16th Avenue -Trip Generation Comparison Rick: Attached is a trip generation comparison of a 4.67 acre site zoned for office, use with a proposed 93-unit multi-family use. The proposed multi-family use would have a lower trip generation in all cases, as compared to more general office use and the more intensive medical office. use. The peak hour rates for the multi-family use would be about 50 percent of the general office use and less than 30 percent of the medical office use. In my opinion, this proposed change would significantly lower the potential trip generation to about 30 to 40 percent of what it could currently be used for. This is based on the assumption that medical professionals would finch this location attractive because of the nearness to King City. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, DrtH AS RTES, INC. Keech, P.E. Engineer Ref: 94.008 AM, GULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR 5111/ 116TH AVENUE TRAFFIC GENERATION (AS ZONED) USE IN OUT TOTAL AM OFFICE-MEDICAL 140 T/H 43 T /H 183 T/H OFFICE-GENERAL 110 T/H 14 T/H 124 T/H PM OFFICE-MEDICAL 83 T/H 192 T/H 275 T/H OFFICE-GENERAL 15 T/H 87 T/H 102 T/H E r 1 m PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Bull Mountain Road Near SW 116th Avenue SITE USE: Professional Office (General Office) (As Zoned) SITE SIZE W: 68,000 Square Feet(1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 11.4 t/KSF ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 00.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 11.4 t/KSF PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 16.0% PERCENTAGE OF TEMPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 13.21/o TOTAL DAILY GENERATION: 775.0 trips per day AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: AM.ENTER TRIP SPLIT: AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: (1) 3.19 acres;, 1 /3 coverage KSF = 1,000 Square Feet 775.0 trips/hour .89 in/total 110.0 trips/hour 14.0 trips/hour', 1002.0 trips/hour .15 in/total 15.0 trips/hour 87.0 trips/hour, Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991, Land Use Code 710 (General Office) M PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Work h t s ee SITE NAME Bull Mountain Road Near SW 116th Avenue (As Proposed) SITE USE: Apartments (ITE Land Use Code 220) SITE SIZE: 93 Units (1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit, ESTIMATED TRANSIT USE: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unite TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 605.0 trips/day. . PERCENTAGE OF "!'RIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 7.9 % . AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: . 48.0 trips/hour AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.'17 in/total. AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 8.0 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 40.0 trips/hour PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: PM P 9.7 % EAK HOURLY GENERA TED TRIPS: 59.0 trips/hour. PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: . 0.68 in/t®fial PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 40.0 trips%hour- PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 19.0 trips/hour Source: 5th Edition "Trip Generation" (ITE, 1991) (1) From Rick Givens t~ ~rN C PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Bull Mountain Road Near SW 1 16th Avenue SITE USE: Professional Office (Medical) (As Zoned) SITE SIZE (A): 68,000 Square Feet(1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING. DURING PM PEAK: TOTAL DAILY GENERATION: 2, AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: AM, PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: (1) 4.67 acres; 1 /3 coverage KSF = 1,000 Square Feet 34.0 t/KSF 00.0 34.0 #/KSF .7.9%. 11.9% 3.12.0 trips per day 183.0 trips/hour .77 in/total 140.0 trips/hour 43.0 trips/hour 278.0 trips/hour .30 in/total 83.0 trips/hour 192.0 trips/hour Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991 , Land Use Code 720 (Medical Office Building) H 'Mokk COMPREHENSIVE PLANT AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION BULL, MOUNTAIN RIB. & PACIFIC HIGHWAY Prepared for: National Mortgage Company Prepared by: Planning Resources, inc. February 17,1994 0 I. INTRODUCTION: This application seeks approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 4.67 acres of land located on Bull Mountain Road at its intersection with Highway 99W. The subject property is described as Tax Lots 1100 and 1200 of Assessor's Map 2S 1 10 AC. Tax Lot 1200 is zoned C-P, Professional Commercial. Tax Lot 1100 is zoned CG, General Commercial. The applicant is requesting that the City's Medium-High Density Residential comprehensive plan designation be applied to both of these lots and that they be zoned R-25. This report has been prepared on the behalf of the owner/applicant, National Mortgage Company. We will demonstrate that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change are consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and the policies of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the applicable approval criteria of the City of Tigard Community Development Code. II. PHYSICAL FEATURES: The subject property is located at the foot of Bull Mountain. Bull Mountain Road forms the northerly boundary of this site, and a frontage road along Pacific Highway forms the eastern border. Existing vegetation consists largely of open field, with a few trees near Bull Moun- tain Road. The site slopes to the south and east with moderate grades predominantly less than ten percent. A vacant commercial structure is sited on Tax Lot 1100. This building was used in the past as a restaurant, but has been vacant for several years. Tax Lot 1200 is vacant. III. EXISTING LAND USE: East: Tax Lot 1101, a .94 acre parcel, is zoned General Commercial and is developed with a service station and car wash. Across Pacific Highway properties are zoned for multi-family residential development. North: Christ the Icing Lutheran Church is located on the north side of Bull Mountain Road across from the subject property. A single-family home and vacant residen, tial lot are also located on the north side of Bull Mountain Road, to the west of Lutheran Church. West: The area to the west of the subject property is zoned R-25 and is presently in the plan review process for development of an apartment project. This area was the subject of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Professional Commercial to Medium High Density Residential in 1992 (File No. CPA 92-0002/ZON 92-0002). '1 0 l A 4 A A _ d m W J t 0 z U W z a- X w W Q W H ~i z u z„ w W O Mw W ~ d R z~ zi z ^1V W Yam ® O • South: Property to the south of this site, at the intersection of Beef Bend Road and Pacific Highway, is zoned R-40, High Density Residential. This parcel is developed with the Wellington Estates apartment complex. Helm Heights, a recently developed subdivision, is located to the west of this apartment complex. Lots in this develop- ment are presently vacant. ICJ. PUBLIC FACILITIES: A. Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is available to this site from two sewer lines. An eight inch sewer line in Bull Mountain Road provides service to the northerly portion of the site. The southerly portion of the property will be served from an existing 8 inch sewer line located in an easement on the Wellington Estates apartment site to the south of the subject property. B. Water Service: Tigard Water District provides water service to the Bull Mountain area. A twelve inch water main is located in the frontage road on the east border of this property. The existing water line in Bull Mountain Road along the street frontage of the subject property is six inches in size. C. Storm Sewer: Storm drainage in this area is provided via roadside ditches along the frontage road parallel with Highway 99W. As mentioned previously, the subject property slopes to the southeast, towards King City. A storm water detention system may be required in order to limit the rate of runoff to pre-development levels and mitigate potential impacts upon downstream properties. The most likely means of accomplishing this detention would be to install an oversized storm pipe in one portion of the on-site system and, through the use of a restricted outlet pipe, use this storage capacity in the pipe to detain storm water during peak rainfall periods. This issue would be addressed in detail at the time of development. D. Streets: Bull Mountain Road is a paved two lane street along the project frontage. Its intersection with Pacific Highway is fully signalized. Frontage improvements to the roadway are planned to be installed at the time of development to improve Bull Mountain Road to full City standards. A second access point to the subject property is available from the frontage road along the eastern border of this site. This roadway provides access to Beef Bend Road. E. Police and Fire Protection: Police and fire protection are provided to the subject property by the City of Tigard. Service levels are adequate to meet the future needs of this site for multi-family development. 1 2 V. COMPLIANCE WITH TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Chapter 18.22 of the Community Development Code for the City of Tigard (the "Code") sets forth the applicable standards for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Zoning District Map. Specifically, Code Section 18.22.010 (Purpose) provides that: A. Tfte purpose of this chapter is to set forth the standard and propose governing legislative and quasi-judicial amendments to this title and the zoning district map. B. Amendments maybe necessary from time to time to reflect changing community condi- tions, needs and desires, to correct mistakes or to address changes in the law. (Ord 89-06; Ord 83-52) Code Section 18.22.040 (Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Standards for Making the Deci- sion) further provide: A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with. conditions or to deny all appli- cation for quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards. 1. The applicable comprehensive plait policies and map designation and, the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community; 2 The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgement of the comprehensive plan and ordinances; 3. The applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable imple- »nentittg ordinance, and 4. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsisten- cy in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. (Ord 89-06; Ord. 83-52) Proposed Findings: The application satisfies the Code's standards pursuant to Section 18.22.04A for a quasi-judicial amendment to the Comprehensive Plan map and concurrent zone change as follows: 1. The application complies with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies (discussed in section VII at page 6 below COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLI- CIES), because the application complies with and supports applicable comprehensive plan policies and because it reflects changes in community conditions and present needs for multi- family housing in this area. The application for amendment of the Comprehensive Plan Map and zone change from commercial to multi-family residential will enhance and not adversely affect 3 the health, safety and welfare of the community. Accordingly, the standards of Code Section 18.22.040A.1. have been satisfied. 2. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan and implementing ordinances have been acknowledged by LCDC and, therefore, the statewide planning goals adopted under ORS Chapter 197 need not be specifically addressed. However, the application complies with the statewide planning goals (discussed in Section VI at page 5 below - "COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS"). Accordingly, the standards of Code Section 18.22.040A.2. have been satisfied. 3. The application complies with the applicable standards of the Code in the following particulars: (a) It complies with the Purpose statement under Section 18.22.01013 of the Code as explained in paragraph 4 of this section below. (b) The application is not coupled with a specific request for development and, accordingly, the Code's various devel- opment approval standards need not be addressed by the application, but will be addressed at the time a specific development plan is proposed under Chapter 18.120 (Site Development Review) of the Code. Accordingly, the standards of Code Section 18.22.040A.3. have been satisfied. 4. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map amendments are necessary to reflect changing community condi- tions, needs and desires. Specifically, the commercial designa- tion of the subject property was never realized by commercial development due to the absence of an appropriate community need and other market conditions. At the same time, a commu- nity need and market for multi-family housing in this area has been identified and presently exists. The pattern of land use on the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map has shifted from commercial to multi-family residential since the subject property was originally designated as commercial. The further specifics of the changing community conditions and needs are more fully set out in Section VII at page 7 below (COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICYAMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY II, page II-8). Accordingly, the standards of Code Section 18.22.040A.4. have been satisfied. 4 VI. COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS: The following LCDC Statewide Planning Goals are applicable to this proposed Zone Change and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application: Goal #1: Citizen Involvement Proposed Findings: The City's citizen involvement program includes opportunity for input from interested citizens and the CIT. Public notice of all hearings is provided in accordance with adopted City procedures.' Goal #2: Land Use Planning Proposed Findings: This goal is satisfied because the City applies all relevant Statewide Planning Goals and Tigard Comprehensive Plan polices to the review of Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change proposals. City procedures include provision for notification and comment from other units of government, including Washington County, the Oregon Department of Transportation, and the Department of Land Conser- vation and Development. 0 Goal #9: Economy of the State Proposed Findings: This application will remove 4.67 acres of land from the City's supply of vacant commercial land. However, this amount of land is not large compared to the total supply of such lands. Additionally, this property has been available for development since the adoption of the Compre- hensive Plan in 1980 and has had no interest expressed for develop- ment under the existing designation. The hillside slopes on this property (8 to 15 percent grades) make development of commercial uses difficult. For this reason, the conversion of this site to multi- family residential use will have no negative impact upon the economy of Tigard or the State. Construction activities relating to the develop- ment of this property for residential use will add short-term construc- tion jabs and will positively affect the economy through the reed for building materials. Goal #10: Housing. Proposed FindinM: This proposal would increase the potential for providing adequate housing to meet projected needs in the City of Tigard. The proposed R-25 zoning would provide for a potential density of development of about 93 units. 5 The Metropolitan Housing Rule (O.A.R. 660-07) interprets Goal 10 for the Portland Metropolitan Area. This Rule requires that the City of Tigard maintain a vacant land inventory which averages 10 housing units per acre and maintains a 50-50 mix of single-family to multi- family development. According to staff, this requirement is currently met by the City, but is very close. If the City is to have flexibility to consider Plan Amendment proposals from residential to other plan designations or from higher to lower residential designations, a cushion is needed which will provide for continued compliance with this stand- ard. The proposed Plan Amendment will assist the City in its contin- ued compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Goal #11: Public Facilities and Services. Proposed Findings: At issue under this Goal is whether the proposed multi-family residen- tial designation is consistent with the level of public facilities and serv- ices which are presently available to the site or which can be made available at the time of development. As discussed in the preceding section of this report, adequatemater, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and transportation facilities can be made available to service the proposed R-25 zoning for this property. Thus, the proposal is consistent with the 0 requirements of Goal 11. Goal #12: Transportation. Proposed Findings: The designation of this site for Medium-High Density Residential development is consistent with Goal 12. Bull ]Mountain Road is a major collector street and is, thus, suited for providing access to R-25 zoned properties. The site is in close proximity to Pacific Highway, a major arterial, and has quick access to shopping and employment areas. Tri-Met bus service is available at the intersection of Pacific Highway with Bull Mountain Road. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Policy 1.1.2. Pale 11-7 The Comprehensive Plan and each of its elements shall be opened for amendments that consid- er compliance with the plans of the Metropolitan Service District (MSD) or its successor on an annual basis, and may be so amended or revised if deemed necessary by the City Council. Annual amendment and revision for compliance with the above regional goals, objectives and plans shall be consistent with any schedule for reopening of local plans approved by the Lad Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). 6 This provision is not to be construed as waiving any legal rights which the City may have to challenge the legality of a regional goa4 objective, or plan provision. Proposed Findings: The proposed amendment is not related to regional goals and, there- fore, the annual review requiremertF is not applicable to this proposal. Implementation Strc!te& 2. Page II-8 The Community Development Code (C.D.C.) shall provide quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map which may be initiated by affected parties on a semi-annual basis and approved if the City Council fuels: a. The change is consistent with applicable plan policies, b. A change of physical circumstances has occurred since the origutal designatioh; or c. A. mistake was made in the origiutal land use designation. Proposed Findings: The proposed Plan Map Amendment is being submitted in accordance OB with the City's schedule for semi-annual reviews. The consistency of this application with applicable policies of the comprehensive plan will be demonstrated in this section of this report. The applicant is not aware of any mistake in the original land use designation of this property. However, many changes have occurred in this area which warrant a change in the designation of this site. Specif- ically, the majority of those properties which had been designated in the Plan for office commercial development, have been converted to multi-family residential designations and are developing for residential use. The most recent of these changes was the approval of a Plan Amendment/Zone Change to R-25 for the adjoining property to the west. This change had the affect of changing 3.19 acres of vacant C-P to a multi-family residential designation and leaving Tax Lot 1200 as an isolated site for office commercial development. Additionally, the Wellington Estates project was developed along the southern bound- ary of the subject property and introduced High Density Residential development in this area of the city. A review of the Zoning District Map dated May 9,1783 (As revised November 1983) indicates that this parcel was also originally designated C-P, Professional Office. Since that time, the City has amended the zoning to R-40. The elimination of these adjacent sites for potential office develop- ment seriously erodes the ability of developing an office park enAron- 7 f ment in this area. The applicant's property which is zoned C-G is less than five acres in size, is too small to attract this type of development in an area considerably removed from other office uses. The introduc- tion of apartment development to the west and on the Wellington Estates site has served to establish multi-family residential as the appropriate land use in this area of the city. Policy 6.1.1. Page II-33 ?ne City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels Proposed Findings: See response under LCDC Goal 10. The designation of this site for multi-family residential use would increase the availability of afford- able housing.in the city and would assist the City in continued compli- ance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Policy 7.1.2. Page II-41 0 77te City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that. a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity atcludutg.• 1. Public water, 2 Public se--ver shall be required for new development within the city unless the proper ty involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health De- partment approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm Drainage. b. Vie facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed develop- went; and 2- Designed to City standards C. All rtew development utilities to be placed underground. and Policy 7.61, Page II-48 771e City shall require as a pre-condition: to development that: 8 a. The development be served by a water system having adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes, b. The development shall not reduce the water pressure in the area below a level adequate for fire protection purposes; and c. The applicable fire district review all applications. Proposed Findings: These policies are satisfied because adequate public water, sewer, storm sewer, fire and police services are available to serve potential multi-family development on this site. The availability of all required utilities has been addressed earlier in this report. Policy 81.1. Page II-55 The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Proposed Findings: This policy is met because the subject property has access to the arte- rial street system via signalized intersections at Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road. Additionally, the site has convenient access to TriMet bus service at the intersection of Pacific Highway and Bull Mountain Road. Policy 8.2.2. Page II-58 77ne City shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by. a. Locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways; b. Incorporating provisions into the Community Development Code which require develop- ment proposals to provide transit facilities; and c. Supporting efforts by Vi-Met and other groups to provide for the needs of the transporta- tion disadvantaged and Policy 9.1.1, Page H-62 The City shall encourage a reduction in energy consumption by increased opportunities for energy conservation and the production of energy from altemative sources. Proposed Findings: The location of a land intensive use such as Medium-High Density Residential in close proximity to the existing transit line on Pacific Highway is consistent with these policies. Access to transit will assist in reducing energy consumption by promoting alternative modes of 9 transportation. Tri-Met Route 12 operates on Pacific Highway within 250 feet of the subject property. Route 12 provides weekday service on a 30 minute interval basis, providing excellent commuting opportu- nities to and from work in Tigard, Portland and Sherwood. Policy 9.1.3. PaS -eI162 77te City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. Proposed Findings: The subject property is located on a south facing slope which affords opportunities for use of passive solar energy in the design of the future development. The designation of this site for multi-family develop- ment would allow the most efficient utilization of this energy source. Policy 12.1.1. Page 11--77 77te City shall provide for housing densities iut accordance with: a. 771e applicable plait policies. 0 b. 77te applicable locational criteria. C. 77te applicable Community Development Code provisions. Proposed Findings: The applicable plan policies are discussed in this section of this report. The proposed R-25 zoning is consistent with these policies. The loca- tional criteria for the Medium High Density Residential designation are discussed below. The future development of this site will be de- signed to comply with applicable Community Development Code provisions regarding density. ,Locational Criterion 3. Medium-Hielt and High Density Residential Pa e~ 11-79 A. 77te following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the plan map: '(1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. Proposed Findings: The subject property is not located in an area committed to low density development. As discussed previously, abutting properties to the west and south are zoned for multi-family residential use, as are properties to the east, across Highway 99W. Tax Lot 1101 is zoned C-G and is developed with a service station. A church is located across Bull Mountain Road from the subject property. 10 (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. Proposed Findings: As discussed above, surrounding properties are committed to multi- family residential and other non-residential uses. These abutting properties serve to buffer this site from low density residential areas. (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. Proposed Findings: This site has direct access from Bull Mountain Road, a designated major collector street. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. Proposed Findings: The subject property is not located in a flood plain, area of high water table, or known geological hazard area. The subject property is locat- ed on a moderate slope which should pose no limitations to the safe development of this site. (S) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. Proposed Findings: As indicated earlier in this report, all necessary public facilities are available in adequate capacity to service the.proposed Medium-High Density Residential development on the property. * - (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. Proposed Findings: Transit is immediately available to this site at the intersection of Bull Mountain Road and Pacific Highway. The parking lot for the Christ the King Lutheran Church at that intersection serves as a park and ride station. (7) Areas within one quarter mule from neighborhood and-commercial shopping centers or business and office centers Proposed Findings:. This property is located within on-quarter mile of shopping facilities in the Canterbury Square shopping center to the north of this site. Addi- tionally, automobile service and limited convenience items are avail- able from the Texaco site contiguous to the subject property. (g) Areas adjacent to eitlrerprivate orpublic permanent open space. 11 Proposed Findings: There is no public or private open space in the immediate vicinity of this site. Open space can be provided on-site in developing the site plan for the future multi-family development. VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed amendments to the Plan Map and Zoning Map are necessary to meet changes in community conditions, deeds and desires by providing affordable housing within close proximity to public transit and supportive retail services. All necessary public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed Medium-High Density designation. The proposed R-25 zoning will allow for greater energy conservation and will provide needed affordable housing. The specific locational criteria for the Medium-High Density designa- tion list eight factors to be considered in siting this land use. The subject site complies with all of these factors. The proposed Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change have been demonstrated to be consistent with the purpose and approval criteria contained in the City of Tigard Communi- ty Development Code for the review of zone change applications. Further, the application has been demonstrated to conform with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Thus, this application complies with all relevant criteria and approval is hereby requested. 0 12 BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR PACIFIC HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT April 15, 1994 Table of Contents Traffic Analysis Outline Traffic Analysis Report Appendix A - Vicinity Map Appendix B - Site Traffic Generation Appendix C - Site Traffic Distribution Appendix D - Site Traffic Assignment Appendix E - Existing Traffic Flow Appendix F - Traffic Growth Appendix G - Intersection Analysis Appendix H, - Site Layout ~ ~Cyt 3i4 3 r yYf~ , r L TRAFFIC A N AL Y S i '0 lJTUL.Jr Determination of Determination of Proposed Surrounding _ Land use activity Land use pattern 0 Site Traffic Assignment r A Survey `o~f b Existing Traffic Ftov 9 Existing Traffic Projection 9 8 I I Existing + I Site Traffic I Projections I I I I I 1 I I Total Traffic I I I I j Intersection Analysis0 Rc)b(art KEECH ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENG~NEER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., SUIT 206, PORTLAND, ORE. (9031641-6333 BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR PACIFIC HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT April 16, 1994 Introduction: This report examines a proposed zoning request that would allow for 93 units of multi-family housing. The current zoning allows for about 68,000 square feet of professional office use. The site is located south of Bull Mountain Road near the intersection of Pacific Highway. One driveway onto Bull Mountain Road is assumed. A detailed site plan has not been prepared. Area of Analysis: This report investigates Bull Mountain Road from McFarland Boulevard to Pacific Highway. Circulation Alternatives: Only direct access to Bull Mountain Road was reviewed. Keech Associates, Inc. v A 1 1 1 1 i 0 0 1 e e BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR PACIFIC HIGHWAY Findings: Page 2 The existing traffic flaw within the study area is summarized in Table A. TABLE A EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW (1) STREET AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Bull Mountain Road 586 Vehicles/Hour 725 Vehicles/Hour McFarland Boulevard 45 Vehicles/Hour 51 Vehicles/Hour Pacific Highway 2,580 Vehicles/Hour 3,520 Vehicles/Hour (1) Two-way traffic flow The trip generation for the proposed multi-family use of the site is estimated at about 605 trip ends per day (93 multi-family units). This can be compared to an estimated 1,544 trip ends per day under the existing zoning of 68,000 square feet of mixed professional and medical office use. All the intersections within the area of analysis currently operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS), "D" or better. It is anticipated that under Total Traffic conditions (existing +site+future traffic growth) will not drop the LOS to unacceptable limits. The left turn traffic out of the proposed site, the movement most subject to delay, would operate at a "B" LOS with a minimal 2 to 6 vehicles per hour. Bull Mountain Road at Pacific Highway currently Keech Associates, Inc. T e t e A i A 1 1 1 1 1 BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD DEAR PACIFIC HIGHWAY Page 3 operates at a "C" LOS. The existing two west-to-north left turn lanes on the Bull Mountain Road approach moderate the impact of the site-generated traffic. Either site use would generate sufficient left turn traffic into the site from Bull Mountain Road to warrant a left turn refuge on Bull Mountain Road. Conclusion: The traffic impact of the proposed zoning change would be less than that which would occur under existing zoning. Ample capacity is available for either zoning. Consideration should be given to providing a left turn refuge on Bull Mountain Road. This should be reviewed in more detail during the design phase of this project. Robert Keech, P.E. Traffic Engineer P.E. #8822 Keech Associates, Inc. ' 4 ►~ow~aaa Airport ® RD ST L ne on L KI INGSWORTH ELL R® g D Portland a 3 BAS ,Y GP~yoN Z~ ~ A(oha Ru BE~4VERTON HICLSD ave on /WY WOODSTG O N ~ e ~ n - - - - - • cam ~ ~ 1'D ' i o I;Rtn y~ KING RL slwauk ~a. Tigar _ m yy FERRY S Bull Mt Lake Oswe o n g King oe' o Joh City rhs~m ,sue ~ f WA,.-- Z a i1 e 1 b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 USE IN OUT TOTAL Aft OFFICE-(MEDICAL 140 T/H 43 T/H 183 T/H OFFICE-GENERAL 110 T/H 14 T/H 124 T/H PM OFFICE-MEDICAL 83 T/H 192 T/H 275 T/H OFFICE-GENERAL 15 T/H 87 T/H 1027/1-1 TRAFFIC GENERATION (AS PROPOSED) T/H = TRIPS PER HOUR v e e 0 t 0 0 P Y PROJECT SITE TIC GENERATION Worksheat SITE NAME Bull Mountain Road Near SW 116th Avenue (As Proposed) SITE USE: Apartments (ITE' Land Use Code 220) SITE SIZE: 93 Units (1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit ESTIMATED TRANSIT USE: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 605.0 trips/day PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 7.9 % AID PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 48.0 trips/hour AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.17 in/total AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 8.0 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 40.0 trips/hour PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 9.7 % PM PEAK HOURLY -GENERATED TRIPS: 59.0 trips/hour PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.68 in/total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 40.0 trips/hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 19.0 tripg/hour Source: 5th Edition "Trip Generation" (ITE, 1991) (1) From Rick Givens e 0 e, s r a s e m r 0 PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Bull Mountain Road Near SW 116th Avenue SITE USE Professional Office (General Office) (As Zoned) SITE SIZE (A): 68,000 Square Feet(1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: t/KSF 11 .4 ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 0.0 0 11.4 t/KSF PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 16.0% PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: TOTAL DAILY GENERATION: 775.0 trips per day AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: (1) 3.19 acres; 1 /3 coverage KSF = 1,000 Square Feet 775.0 trips/hour .89 in/total 110.0 trips/hour 14.0 trips/hour 102.0 trips/hour .15 in/total 15.0 trips/hour 87.0 trips/hour Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991, Land Use Code 710 (General Office) PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Bull Mountain Road [dear SW 116th Avenue d) Z A one s SITE USE: Professional Office (Medical) ( SITE SIZE (A): 68,000 Square Feet(1) TRIP GENERATION RATE: UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE 34.0-t/KSF ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 00.0 34.0 t/KSF PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 7.9% PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 11.9% d TOTAL DAILY GENERATION: 2, ay 312.0 trips per AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: 183.0 trips/hour AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: .77 in/total AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 140.0 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 43.0 trips/hour PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION: 275.0 trips/hour PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: .30 in/total 0 trips/hour 83 PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: . 192.0 trips/hour (1) 4.67 acres; 1 /3 coverage KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transport dical Office Building) M 720 ation Engineers, 1991, e ( Land Use Code 77- Site traffic distribution for primary trips based on observation of existing traffic flows and general land use patterns. t i s 0 m e t w z w~ a a O " i 9 i ~w CV r rn U ~ ~o N cz, co Qz o _ F-- Q ck:: ~ Q LIJ - z O LIJ CO ~G U , ~/~r~r^trlrtinrl p.l~ir-! a 16 s i i 1 1 1 a e e A 1 r ce> oe Zw~ a y - <57) w _ !Ll ~ ~~o U S LL- E U Q LL- ,:::c L cx_ G p ~ QQ U O Chl= cz: ME 7 LLJ C)L 4z~ A A _ r' --.-I _ I ml r t i i 1 1 1 e 0 0 s e t T4 ~ My~,y ~s BUJ 4- n i1J w v -2 McFarland Blvd L C> G>.~ - cn o w~i z z ~ ~,G~Uv `Q 0 e f A 1 A A 1 i 1 i 1 i r 0 4 J/,~/J4 e LLI LU Ll~ 11j, _ Z QUA OF w-: z Q- J C__ ciz: CD l1 V l CD~ Q zm o Q 0 LL-1 O ^ 1LX V• M~~ryrlrnr! p,l~~r-I D a s 0 e r e v B 1 e ~y6~y c'7 U~~ uj, s ~LIJ~ L.L1 u_1 U g o. rn U . o U ~ C a ~LL-~ ~ 4W s o ~zCo ~Q CIZZ LL-1 - n z 0 LJ- ~ - McFarland Blvd t e 1 A 1 1 P 1 e e a B e APPENDIX E Existing Traffic Flow Existing traffic flow as measured March and April, 1994. 1 1 1 1 t 0 1 i P 1 1 1 1 i 1 t T4 ~ry6/y cn Q%cl> LL1 z uj C' C) - o LL-1 Lij LL rn U_ 4- , ~vo U CD fl ~ o (D x LLJ O t.9_! z .J-31 ~ n~ iL U N ICQ AArFrrlnnr-I R1%,,-J INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT HIGHWAY 99W (COMPOSITE) T= 7%r P=.907 y~A OF COUNT: 3/31&4/13/94 NO 1998 1901 DAY OF WEEK: Th&W R 98 900 0 TIME STARTED: 06:45 T TIME ENDED: 08:45 H a-153 ®J 1 Lp. 4-0 374 J LO T= 0% T= 1.6 % - r0 P=.832 0 P=O. 162 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME A b0 T=oTRUCKS BY APPROACH 536 --t;. al I rl- 0 P=PHF BY APPROACH Peak Hour 55 1527 0 w 07:20-08:20 Traffic Smithy 1062 1 T= 3.8% P=.848 1582 TEV=3116 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD --p. ! FROM - TO a a~ 1 Lo. .4-1 ! L AT L 06:45-06:50 6 0 10 3 55 0 3 107 0 0 0 0 184 06:50-06:55 5 0 28 20 4 563 0 0 6 91 0 0 0 0 186 06:55-07:00 7 0 07:00-07:05 6 0 23 9 65 0 1 85 0 0 0 0 189 07:05-07:10 16 0 28 9 69 0 9 88 0 0 0 0 242 07:10-07:15 8 5 43 8 81 ,0 3 07:15-07:20 6 0 21 6. 94 0 5 112 0 0 0 0 244 07:20-07:25 12 0 25 7 83 0 3 136 0 0 0 0 266 07:25-0?:30 14 0 35 7 64 0 10 112 0 0 0 0 242 07:30-07:35 16 0 18 20 65 0 6 151 0 0 0 0 276 07:35-07:40 11 0 30 4 73 0 5 123 0 0 0 0 246 07:40-07:45 21 0 41 5 91 0 1 152 0 0 0 0 311 07:45-07:50 11 0 29 4 87 0 1 150 0 0 0 0 282 07:50-07:55 23 0 36 6 82 0 9 153 0 0 0 0 309 07:55-08:00 8 0 35 3 61 0 7 113 0 0 0 0 227 08:00-08:05 17 0 22 15 64 0 3 107 0 0 0 0 228 08:05-08:10 9 0 26 6 92 0 5 94 0 0 0 0 232 08:10-08:15 13 0 33 11 51 0 3 113 0 0 0. 0 224 08:15-08:20 7 0 44 10 87 0 2 123 0 0 0 0 273 08:20-08:25 7 0 23 8 63 0 5 138 0 0 0 0 244 08:25-08:30 7 0 39 7 69 0 8 98 0 0 0 0 228 08:30-08:35 9 0 17 20 90 0 6 115 0 0 0 0 257 08:40-08:405 6 0 12 14 69 0 2 89 0 0 0 0 192 Total Survey 252 S 653 20S 1730 0 116 2722 0 0 0 0 5683 PHF 74 0 88 72 87 0 65 84 0 0 0 0 .863 Trucks 2.4 20 1.2 7.8 6.9 0 6.9 3.6 0 0 0 0 4.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 op 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 06:45-07:45 128 5 322 86 853 0 56 1346 0 0 0 0 2796 07:00-08:00 152 5 364 88 915 0 60 1469 0 0 0 0 3053 07:15-08:15 161 0 351 94 907 0 58 1516 0 0 0 0 3087 07:30-08:30 150 0 376 99 885 0 55 1515 0 0 0 0 3080 07:45-08:45 124 0 331 119 877 0 60 1376 0 0 0 0 2887 _ INTERSECTION TGRN MOVE[~7T COUNT SUMMARY REPORT- ; BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT MCFARLAND BOUL MR6 T=..3.5% P=.625 ® DATE OF COUNT- 03/31/94 O 35 DAY OF WEEK: Thu R 3 0 32 ~10 TIME STARTED: 06:45 TIME ENDED: 08:45 H 4-139 e-145 1 t9 0 T= 1.4t 136 a T= 8s 446 P=.879 - o P=.755 TEV= TOTAL mi'IRY VOLUM E 0 f T=tTRUCKS BY APPROACH ®3 I (p~ P=PH F BY APPROA CH 4 78 - ---P- 447 0 0 Peak a Hour _ 0 0 ♦ 07. TE 20-08:20 27 Traffic Smithy Traffic Survey Service O t P =p ; ~ 0 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD FROM - TO a 3 .4j .41 I f a- L ALL 2 0 25 06:45-06.50 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 30 06:50-06:55 06:55-07:00 0 0 24 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 7 0 0 38 42 07:00-0705 0 0 33 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 57 50 07:05-07:10 07:10-07:15 0 38 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 1 55 07:15-07:20 0 39 0 0 0' 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 9 1 54 07:20-07:25 07:25-07:30 0 0 42 37 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22 0 0 50 50 07:30-07:35 07:35-07:40 0 0 24 34 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 .'6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5 1 1 53 47 07:40-07:45 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 . 1 46 8 07:45-07:50 07:50-07:55 0 0 38 50 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 1 5 49 07:55-08:00 08:00-08:05 0 0 35 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 0 0 43 61 08:05-08:10 08:10-08:15 0 0 33 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 2 2 50 66 08:15-08:20 0 49 1 .0 0 0 0 0 .2 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 36 08:20-08:25 08:25-08:30 0 0 27 35 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 23 0 2 49 48 08:30-08:35 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 28 08:35-08:40 0 0 12 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 2 36 08:40-08:45 Total Survey 0 787 1 4 0 53 PHF 0 88 25 .25 0 73 Trucks 0 1.3 100 25 0 1.9 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 06:45-07:45 0 401 0 4 0 26 07:00-08:00 0 449 0 4 0 30 07:15-08:15 0 436 0 3 0 34 07 429 1 07:45-08:45 0 386 1• 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 258 18.1121 0 0 0 0 72 56.885 0 0 0 0 7.8 11.1 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.- 1 0_ 0 0 0 0 114 6 551 0 0 0 0 121 7 611 0 0 0 0 135 8 616 0 0 0 0 0 144 12 570 g- - t v r e e s t s 0 w W ~ ~ W T rn o LL1 W LL U c~ p U ~ LL- Z F- L ~7C~ C5 O Ci I L2 ~ _ . Vr f L- z S~ LJ - cal z ~ * ■ e tt`I o IO ~-p CIO d °7a McFarland Blvd a 0 0 m e a r e 0 a t ? INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMARY REPORT RU BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT HIGHWAY 99v POSITE) ( A T= 2005 1.9% P=.903 O DATE OF COUNT: 04/11&12/94 N 1 1 541 DAY OF WEEK: M&T R 330 1675 0 TIME STARTED: 16:30 TIME ENDED: 18 :30 4-442 H 4 Lt. 4 1 13 $ e J A LO ~0 T= 2.2% T= Oo 0 - s 4-0 P=O P=.75 72 0 . TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME ♦ r T=T RUCKS BY A PPROACH A-1 P=PHF BY APPROACH 210 112 1403 0 0 Peak Hour 11747 e 16: 45-17:45 Traffic Smithy m T= 2.6o P=.884 1515 TEV=3730 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND. WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD FROM - TO 0- - j j L► .4-1 I & .4- L a ALL 16:30-16:35 9 0 27 23 150 0 0 11 10 84 107 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 311 290 16:35-16:40 6 0 0 14 9 17 21 136 123 0 6 137 0 0 0 0 303 16:40-16:45 16:45-16:50 7 5 0 18 18 130 0 10 119 0 0 0 0 0 300 289 16:50-16:55 7 0 8 12 28 19 121 148 0 0 8 5 117 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 307 16:55-17:00 17:00-17:05 3 5 0 0 7 21 155 0 4 90 0 0 0 0 0 -0 282 276 17:05-17:10 5 0 0 11 10 30 29 117 124 0 0 16 15 97 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 17:10-17:15 17:15-17:20 7 4 0 8 30 137 0 11 133 0 0 0 0 0 323 355 17:20-17:25 8, 0 11 25 40 164 159 0 0 5 10 142 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 17:25-17:30 17:30-17:35 6 9 0 0 9 25 38 122 0 10 113 0 0 0 0 0 317 330 17:35-17:40 8 0 13 30 153 0 0 9 9 117 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 309 17:40-17:45 5 5 0 0 6 12 22 30 145 98 0 8 102 0 0 0 0 255 17:45-17:50 17:50-17:55 12 0 18 32 110 0 17 102 0 0 0 0 0 291 288 17:55-18:00 10 0 27 13 23 31 111 104 0 0 2 11 115 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 18:00-18:05 18:05-18:10 10 10 0 0 19 22 116 0 9 93 0 0 0 0 0 269 276 18:10-18:15 4 0 0 18 17 25 25 123 110 0 0 9 3 2 97 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 292 18:15-18:20 18:20-18:25 6 6 0 15 32 97 0 . 17 87 0 0 0 0 0 254 267 18:25-18:30 5 0 12 21 109 0 8 112 0 0 0 Total Survey 162 0 339 632 3062 0 232 2670 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7104 906 PHF s Trucks 78 2 1 0 0 73 2.7 .76 .9 91 2.1 0 0 .67 .4 87 2.8 0 0 0 .0 0 . 2.2 Stopped Buses - . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Peds 0 Hourly Totals 16:30-17:30 72 0 144 301 1664 0 111 1379 0 7 0 0 0 3678 3730 16:45-17:45 72 0 138 330 1675 0 112 1403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3668 17:00-18:00 15-18:15 17 84 91 0 0 157 179 350 348 1595 1542 0 0 116 110 1366 1372 0 0 0 0 3642 : 17:30-18:30 90 0 195 331 1398 0 121 1291 0 0 0 0 3426 7-1 e B t e v s e 0 t IF- INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT MC FARLAND BOULEVART A T= 25 N 0% P=.625 a DATE OF COUNT: 04/12 /94 1 0 I26 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 2 0 23 TIME STARTED: 16:30 TIME ENDED: 18 :30 H 4-433 1 Lv- 4-45 2 3 421 5 T= 4% T= 1.2% 250 4-431 P=.910 0 rp P= .911 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME i T=%T RUCKS BY A PPROAC H $ I P=PHF BY APPROACH .255 0 0 0 273 --s - 7 2 Pe 0 ® : 1 8:25 5 1 Traffic Smithy 1 T= 0% P=O. IO TEV=732 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND T OEM - PER TTOIOD j .41 1 y' I f* 4 L ALL 16:30-16:35 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 30 2 1 45 52 16:35-16:40 16:40-16:45 0 0 21 25 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 0 20 1 47 16:45-16:50 0 26 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 30 0 2 69 60 16:50-16:55 16:55-17:00 0 0 28 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 59 17:00-17:05 0 13 0 0_ 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 36 3 2 54 57 17:05-17:10 17:10-17:25 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 38 1 58 17:15-17:20 0 22 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 24 4 2 62 45 17:20-17:25 17:25-17:30 0 0 18 24 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 32 3 63 17:30-17:35 0 19 0 0 0 2 3 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 42 2 2 56 64 17:35-17:40 17:40-17:45 0 0 17 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 2 67 17:45-17:50 0 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 36 2 1 61 61 17:50-17:55 17:55-15:00 0 0 22 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 37 2 60 18:00-18:05 0 16 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 32 3 0 56 56 18:05-18:10 18:10-18:15 0 0 23 20 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 41 2 68 18':15-18:20 0 25 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 37 0 2 60 60 18:20-18:25 18:25-18:30 0 0 19 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 5 52 Total Survey 0 495 8 2 0 36 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 806 91 45 75 1392 .953 PHF o Trucks 0 0 .92 4 .63 0 .25 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 1.2 . 0 2.2 , Stopped Buses s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Ped 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16:30-17:30 0 247 .4 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 383 22 671 714 16:45-17:45 0 246 4 0 0 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 421 422 24 26 708 17:00-18:00 17:15-18:15 0 0 235 246 4 5 0 1 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 421 25 719 17:30-18:30 0 248 4 2 0 21 0 0 0 0 423 23 721 v t i 0 r a m a r APPENDIX F Traffic Growth The traffic growth was assumed at a 10% increase in existing traffic on Pacific Highway and Bull Mountain Road, plus the traffic from a proposed 194 unit multi-family development directly to the west of the subject site. This increase is used to provide a level of service comparison for the immediate future. W W t- LL. Lij N A I A~ rn U ~ t-a O Quo L~ ~ McFarland Blvd , U U- s o N m C5 JD . %j LLA Co -A cis -71 r N Is, Z~ rt .s PAjq PuDlJ®=JOVJ "t3 ca ~b 9` "f r® V % 'j .0 Q z a Lu, I-- ~p~ t89 LLl L!_1- 4---- G1 O L J Cdr -F- ley, (D ~ U o U--1 ash LL- W be 4 V z. t s 0 r t 0 t r V L 4- W 47 4-1 tFl~ Ifi ~ LU \JJzo, LU w~ v ~ c McFarland Blvd O d CD ~ ~ 3 Q O LJA fl. e 'L e e 1 1 e t e s m t e t . hr _ d AA,-r-eNrl,- nrl Rl%irl e t e i 0 e i 0 e s t e r 2 Z 41 10 ck~ / o So 44-L44 'f r► 4J,W + 8 O PAjq Pur-)j.ao=AOVq `fi'r l~ \1) 7;;, u+ co co i ~ 1 0 6-4 ,r r% aa7 ~zv'C LLJ Lu C-D~ z~l G) _a LL-1 z Z O BLJ GvN° LL- ~ J p C> N 4 4 0' O ~ APPENDIX G Intersection Analysis Traffic Projections: Estimated Existing Estimated existing traffic flow from.field measurements conducted March and April, 1994. Existing + Site (As,Zoned) - Existing traffic plus site traffic as if site were built out as zoned (68,000 square feet of professional office). Existing + Site (As Proposed) - Existing traffic plus site traffic as if site were built out as proposed (93 multi-family units). Total Traffic (As Zoned) - Existing and site (as zoned) plus traffic growth. Total Traffic (As Proposed) = Existing and site ( as proposed) plus traffic growth. t t Intersection Existing LOS Existing + Site LOS Z/P Total Traffic LOS Z/P Bull Mountain Road at Access (stop sign control) (1) AM Peak Hour B/A C/13 PM Peak Hour B/B C/C Bull Mountain Road at Pacific Highway (stop sign control) (1) AM Peak Hour C C/C C-D/C-D PM Peak Hour C C/C C-D/C-D -ji LOS = Level of Service (See Level of Service Criteria) Z = Site As Zoned P = Site As Proposed (1) The level of service, for stop sign controlled intersections, is calculated for each stop or yielding movement. Generally, the side street left turn movement has the poorest LOS as illustrated in the Summary of Capacity Analysis. This LOS may be experienced by only a few vehicles (those making the left turn), whereas the average LOS of all vehicles entering the intersection would be much better. i 4 f 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 Reserve Capacity(1) vehicles/hour LOS Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic > 400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays # F (1) Reserve Capacity = Adjusted Capacity - Demand LOS = Level of Service *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Source: "Highway Capacity Manual"; Special Report 209; Transportation Research Board (1985). F LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED 1 INTERSECTION Level of service A Describes operations with very low delay, i.e., less than 5.0 sec per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. . Level of service R ® rn......~ ti.... a ....e ..,:H~ :n ttie ranna of 5.1 to 15.0 see ner vehicle. This vc~~.e:vcia vpora uveeo •~e y a.. Y••• generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Level of service C Describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass throught the intersection without stopping. Level of service D Describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/C ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level of service E Descibes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Level of Service F Describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Source: 'Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209; Transportation Research Board (1985). ~ IS S 1 4- L+ IV existing S M . i Si te ~r, z SUP ~ 41 4-1 F~ - Existinq+Site ►21 1$2 Traffic Growth (A,7 m 1 Ns Total Traffic Bull Mtn Road near Pacific Highway Robert KEECH ASSOCIATH INC. .~eess CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER A W\ Pvv%~ -V-- Oe4 p- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access Date of Count: E+S-Proposed Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: AM Peak Hour xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 30 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH.GRADES: XXXXXXXXXXXX xxxxxxxxxxxx A 096:B- 096:C 096 Bull Mtn Rd x x SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH C: none x C x Access APPROACH >»»»A««<<<>>>>>>>D«««<»»»>C<««<<»»»>B«««< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR .VOLUMES 0 536 1 0 0 0 6 0 34 7 153 0 PCH 7 37 8 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR-•AT= 536.5 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 5.46% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=A) 678 678 37 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR-AT= 537 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAFACI'I'Y USED= 1.034 IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL• ) CONFI ICTING FLOW . 5AR -AT•- aL-BT -BT=BR-DT- DR= 696.5 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT-- .99 ADJL'Si'ED CAPACITY TED= .99 DE:I CV a-T rrY USED- _ 1.v f7oo- IMPEDANCE CREATED= DEMAND (LOS=A) 780 780 8 422 418 7 A 1 e LOS Level of Service (11/89) On majc,: streets with 4 lanes, conflict=ing t'cluume equals0.75 of PCH UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access Date of Count: TT Proposed Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: AM Peak-Hour xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 30 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxssx A 0%:B 0%:C 0% Bull Mtn Rd x x SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH C: none x C x Access APPROACH »»»>A<<<<<«»>>>>>D<<<<<<<»»>>>C««<<<>>>»»B<<<<<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL -DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 657 1 0 0 0 6 0 34 7 182 0 PCH 7 37 8 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 657.5 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 6.21% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=A) LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 658 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 1.16% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR-A.T-=-AL=BL rBT'-BR-DT-DR= 846 .5 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .99 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 2.03% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DE".AND (LOS= B) 1 1 1 B e 596 596 37 689 689 8 347 344 7 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major stret-<ts is-ith 4 lanes, conflicting volui.irivi equals0.75 of PCH Exiating Traffic Growth i 4- 4J4, 106 Total Traffic Robert KEECH. ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND, OR 97229 (50316411-6333 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access Date of Count: E+S zoned Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: am Peak Hour xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Prevailing Speed: 30 . B # 'of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx A 096:B 0%:C 0% Bull Mtn Rd x x SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH C: none x C x Access APPROACH »»»>A<<<««»>»»D<<<<<<<>>>>>>>C<<<<<<<>»».>>B«««< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT- BR VOLUMES 0 536 19 0 0 0 4 0 24 106 153 0 PCH 4 26 117 VRIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 545.5 CAPACITY 671 CRITICAL GAP= SSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 671 CAPACITY USED= 3.87° IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A.) 26 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 555 CAPACITY 766 CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 766 CAPACITY USED= 15.27% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .89 DEMAND (LOS=A) 117 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW .521,R-,.XT- -NL-BL--BT.=BR--DT-~DR= 804'.5 CAPACITY 368 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .89 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 328 CAPACITY USED= 1.22% IMPEDANCE CRE`-TED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=B.) 4 a 0 r LOS = Level of Scrvi-ce (11/89) On null stre:ts :it!: 4 lanes, conflicting, voluume equalsC.75 of PCH e UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx B A xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Bull Mtn Rd x x x x x C x Access Date of Count: TT zoned Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: am Peak Hour Prevailing Speed: 30 # of lanes on major street: 2 APPROACH GRADES: A 0%:B 0%:C 0% SHARED LANES: APPROACH C: none APPROACH »»>»A«««<»»>>>D«««<»»»>C«««<»»>>>B<<<«« MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 657 19 0 0 0 4 0 24 106 182 0 PCH 4 26 117 RIGHT TURFS FRO'_`'I C (CR) CAPACITY 590 CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+,XT= 666.5 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 590 CAPACITY USED= 4.41% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 26 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) T= 676 CAPACITY 677 CONFLICTING FLOW AR+A 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 CRITICAL GAP= 4 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 677 . CAPACITY USED= 17.28% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .88 DEMAND (LOS=A) 117 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOSS' .SAR'-Ai'+AL+BL+BT-BR=DT=DR= 954.5 CAPACITY 295 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. T_MPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .88 ADJUSTED CAPACITY DEMAND (LOS-'C) 260 4 CAPACITY USED= 1.54% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 e Is;'J r LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 Lanes, conflicting voluume equals0."15 of PCH Y 3~ Si te ►~L4 F-P Traffic Growth 11 AS ~1~A~OScfJ,o Bull Mtn Road near Pacific Highway ?uLL N 1~ot ArCC~Ss 11 PM PeAlL t~~ R 1 YY l li'[`Y' -T7 213 Existing FV Fxi&tin g+Site 5b1~ 3y 4-1-t F~ Total Traffic Robert INC KEECH ASSOCIATES CONSULTING TRAFFIC F 9 ~IN64 6R 3 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., P_6RTLAND, OR 9722 0 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx B A t:xxxxxxXxxxx xxkxxxxxxxxx Bull Mtn Rd x x x x x C x Access Date of Count: E+S Proposed Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak Hour Prevailing Speed: 30 # of lanes on major street: 2 APPROACH GRADES: A 0%••B 0%:C 0% SHARED LANES: APPROACH C : none APPROACH >>>>>>>A<<<<<<<>»»>>D<<<<<<<>>»7»C<<<<<<<>>>>>>>B<««« MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 273 6 0 0 0 3 0 16 34 452 0 PCH 3 18 37 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTI NG FLOW .5AR+AT= 276 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 CAPACITY USED= 1.99% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL). CONFLICTING FLOW AR+A`r= 279 CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 CAPACITY USED= 3.63% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR AT= 2kT BL BT+BR+D.r--DR== 762 CRITIC AL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .97 C':PACI'"`_' USED= .8% 1`IPFnANCE C REATED= .99 e 0 P CAPACITY 904 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 904 DEMAND (LOS=A) 18 CAPACITY 1019 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1019 DEMAND ( LOS=A) 37 CAPACITY 389 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 377 DEMAND ( LOS=B) 3 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) Or, mFi-or streets ,;it1 4 iane conflicting ':)lilLlme eq;1-'a7. ;0.75 of PCH UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access Date of Count: TT Proposed Day.of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak Hour xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 30 B of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxx xh:xxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:C 0% Bull Mtn Rd x x SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH C: none x C x Access APPROACH >>>>>>>A<<<<<<<>>»»>D<<<<<<<>>>>>>>C<<<<<<<»»»>B<<<«« MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0' 332 6 0 0 0 3 0 16 34 566 0 PCH 3 18 37 RIGHT TUR\ S FROM C ( C R ) CONFLICTI NG FLOW .5AR+AT= 335 CRI'T'ICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 CAPACITY USED= 2.12% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTI NG FLOW AR+AT= 338 CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 CAPACTTTY USED= 3.85% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 LEFT TURNS FROM, C (CL) CONFLICTI NG =TOW T RiTTCAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .97 CAPACITY USED= 1.02% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 CAPACITY ADJUSTED CAPACITY DEMAND (LOS=A) CAPACITY ADJUSTED CAPACITY DEMAND (LOS=A) CAPACITY ADJUSTED CAPACITY DEMAND (LOS=C) 850 850 18 962 962 37 304 295 3 a B r LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH. J4 ~ ~ - kf '.}f < • ''d ! ~ 1 1 ~y 2 J l~ k y~ J • f 1 S )T`~ J 4~ ~7.TN J2 ' w' f" E '~;t r3. i4'kS. L~,.~ W y4'~1.1,{ i '~wr~~sAr~'6'V LDT~'"t~.fT`S~p.~~'tiH } ^Y! ~ ~ . (rte ' 41 • , \ 213 -li 42 - C ; - d• ; UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access Date of Count: E+S zoned Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak Hour xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 30 , B of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRAD ES: xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:C 0% Bull Mtn Rd. x x SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH C: none x C x Access APPROACH »»>>>A<<<<<<<»»»>D<<<<<<<»»»>C«« «<»»»>B«««< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR -BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 273 7 0 0 0 21 0 119 42 452 0 PCH 23 131 46 RIGHT TURN'S FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 276.5 CAPACITY 904 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 904 CAPACITY USED= 14.49% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .9 DEMAND (LOS=A) 131 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 2,80 CAPACITY 1018 CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1018 CAPACITY USED= 4.52% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 46 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT=AL'BL4•BT+BR+DT-DR= 770.5 CAPACITY 385 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .97 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 373 CAPACITY USED= 6.17% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS='B) 23 m P e LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH, UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mtn Road Access Date of Count: TT zoned Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak Hour- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 30 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxh xxxxxxxxxxxx A 0`-:B 0%:C 0% Bull Mtn Rd x x SHARED LANES: x x APPROACH C: none x C x Access APPROACH »»»>A«««<»»»>D«««<>>>»»C«««<>>>»»B«««< MOVEMENT AL AT AR. DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 332 7 0 0 0 21 0 119 42 566 0 PCH 23 131 46 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 335.5 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 15.41% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .89 DEMAND (LOS=A) LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR}AT= 339 CAPACITY CRITICAL GAP= 4.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 4.79% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AP.=AT~AL=BL•+BT+BR=DT+DR= 943.5 CAPACITY - CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .97 AD13USTFD CAPACITY CAPACITY USED= 7.9% !M 'EDAtiCE CREATED= .94 DE'`1.-'IND (L OS='C) s N LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On ma for otreets with 4 lanes, CJl f =.Ct ii1Cj voluume equal s0 .75 of PCH. 850 850 131 961 961 46 300 291 23 4 3~y ai s.«• z~ ~M M 1 00 Q •t n• -It Lp 4-J 4, 4 -4iV Exlsfi(n 9 Site og 4-J 4- 4 qW- `iQ° 17 F-P i p W 4- 4 89 ~ Existing+Sifie 4 °0 32 Traffic Growth ya9 IL 4~ U Z~ 2 '9 9 " as Total Traffic Bull Mtn Road near pacific Highway Robe rt ` UU- M-" Ax ~tCdk W►W~ KEECH ASSOCIATES INur. CONSULTING TRAFFIC 67229 61NE R V6p- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND, I 4' --SIGNALIZE D INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 7:15:42 INTERSECTION: Bull Mtn Road at Pacific Highway VOLUMES : SXlST!!J (.,7 / 4t.A METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: !PHASE !P HASE !PHASE'!PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 ;r:;*4:k+:A•9: k. :k !';rt:': *:F 7:* 7: :k is 9: ' I 1 ! I 1 I 1 * ! ! ! ! * SERVI CE LEVEL C ! ! ! ! E ! ! * SATUR ATION 6996 I I - I I I I I 7f :k1Y*1Y* • 111 *YiY *YY ;Yi i:t APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! ! SOUTH NORTH- WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDT MOVE WI DTH ! ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 1'.0' .0 ! 2 ! 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T .0 ! ? ! . L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R T R SOUTH ! 55 1527 0 158E ! 480 6996 00 ! A C A RTH ! 0 900 0 900 ! .00 4596 096 ! A St'I ST ! 374 Lfi2 536 ! 69% r`^0 51 0 C °t ! EAST ! 0 0 ! 0.1 00 00 ! *t 5 00-1 ! ! - t t --'r PHASE W/0 -ERL' T7 (C-2)! ! r a! ! i~ ! /T K- IOC IC)\ (r: t IPP OAC!i \'i - ~'~:L 'LS t N 0V E NORTH WEST R c:a .000 090 Oc~ ! DJ! OOC .000 .083 OC^ ?24 .250 .000 000 L .032 0(_ .1i9 474L j' V,-. 19 TOT'-,T- BEn-.100 050 t r rC - tIT t t `T MT- iV1 ~ L " 'EC".S) ! PL t'rJL "Oi STORAGE ! T ! AT L^S C ! APPR ! L. T R ! L T R ! SOi t'H 3029 SOUTH ! 9.1 77.2 .0 ! 85 454 1ORT'H ! 3208 ! NORTH ! -0 77.2 .0 ! 0 268 0 WEST ! 677 ! WEST ! 2111 .0 30.8 ! 255 0 201 ! EAST 0 ! EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 0 ! , H", --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05,JAN92) 4/15/1994 INTERSECTION: Bull Mtn Road Zt Pacific Hi hway VOLUMES: ~)CISTIRJ t SITE P(~oP>td'~ ~ AM p~K' METRO SIZE- 500,000'?', ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME:• 7:22:57 !PHASE '.PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 I I ! I I 1 I::*:k*~•t.t:kic*~;f;~;r;7::kl:**:k***it I 1 i 1 1 I I * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C I ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 7096 I 1 t I I I I 9: ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! ! SOUTH ?FORTH WEST EAST ! LATE ' MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT V0L•U'IES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT L• T R! L T R! ! - - - I SOUTH i SOUTS7 ! 57 1527 0 1584 ! 4996 70% 0% ! A C ! NORTL ! 0 900 103 1003 ! 0% 456 170 ! A A , G;EST -100 t70 57V 709is 0 c 5116 ! C A ! T A S 0 0 0 f1 ! 11% 0% C°v ! . PAR! T!a". FED' ;7' NO' I PIiASIX G i ! 5.0`6. ' \ ! - ' ."NIS-T1;RN PHASE 1•c10 OVERLAP (C-2) ! l.,• ! 5.^ ?f ! ! ! F,-D1RE~T.0'- SE -_!?ATIO`; (C-4) ! - APPROACH /C VA_'_ ! VE SOUTH NORTH NEST EAST ! .000 .057 C9: .000 F. - 20J ! .000 .0,47 -087 .000 ! .424 .250 .000 .000 ! ! . 033 00 L' .000 ! -S i7 ;'C=.4 74 E -W V/C=.128 TOTAL AMBER=.100 '?I\I"•:'.:.`i V/C=.050 ! :-EG VOLUME ! MIME NAIL (SECS) ! MOVE STORAGE LEG Al L.OS C i APPR L T R ! L T R! SOL'Tii 2998 ! SOUTH ! 9.0 76.1 .0 ! 88, 465 0 ! NORTH ! 3310 ! NORTH ! .0 76.1 99.0 ! C 274 30 WEST ! 824 ! WEST ! 22.9 .0 31.9 ! 270 0 208 ! EAST 0 ! EAST .0 .0 C ! 0 0 0 ! --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 7:24:57 INTERSECTION: Bull Mtn Road at Pa ific Hi hway VOLUMES: As A yA Pb,41L METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 I I I 1 1 1 ! +;**t~::k*:+: :kit*9r:kr;a;~:wa;s;;p f; i;w i; t l 1 I I I 1 * * ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C-D ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 77% 1 APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ' SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH „LOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ' 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 -0 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 •0 ! 3 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L•.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L R TOT ! L T R! L T R 1 i SOUTH ! 65 1677-----0--1742 ! 601% 7796 0% ! C-D ! N0RT11 ! 0 990 12-^11 1114 ! 0°a 50% 18°0 ! A A ~ :4."'11 ! 489 0 202 691 ! 7790 006 55 a ! D. 1P PR! 7 is! 1 1.. W L... PIT T15 0 'It; N/ S 'T 1_P,\ PHASE ~S- \'U• - i, "L'-.\LI..T-VN S Ell) "1!:11{:-\ • -7 1 7 1, 1 _ 11 MOVIE ' SOUTH NORTE WEST EAST R ! 000 .069 .112 .000 R --ADJ! .000 .054 .10-^_ .00() T 66• .275 .000 .000 ! L ! 037 .000 .156 .000 1?_S v/I'-.516 E. Vic I TOT ':BEP 100 NiIN7M1M V/C=.050, ! 1 LEG VOLUME 1 ! TINE A~'AT-' L (SECS) ' MO V7 STORAGE ! L T R ! i EG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T r SOUTH ! 2969 ! SOUTH ! 8.0 74.9 .0 ! 101 526 0 ! NORTH ! 3319 ! NORTH ! .0 74.9 100.0 ! 0 310 35 ! WEST ! 890 ! WEST ! 25.1 .C 33.1 1 322 0 244 ! I=AS 1 ! 0 ! EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 0 S , ~ cr err ~ 41 Rot ~ . Sul( Mtn Road near Pacific High Robert way K E P C HASSOCIATES INC. ZuLt" 04:" RJ AT QA"R`'xy CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER A-n) Pbnl%,o4- v6" 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 10: 2:22 ` INTERSECTION: Bull Mtn. Roa at Pacific H'ghway VOLUMES: IR St .W% Vwy_ NyR- METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: b:bull_pac !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 ! ! s ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70%- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L•.. 12.0 .0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L• T R! SOUTH ! 80 1527 0 1607 ! 65% 70% 0% ! B C ! NORTH ! 0 900 179 1079 ! 0% 4596 21% ! A A ! WEST ! 392 0 168 560 ! 70% 0% 5116 ! C A ! ! EAST ! 0 0 0 0 0-0, 096 051 APPR! IRKS! !X-WL:K!PEDS? N0! ! PHASING ! ' 5.000-! ' U S - ! ! ! N ! 5.0°v! ! \ ! ! !N/S-TURN PHASE W/O OVERLAP (C-2; . W ! 5. 0'0-! ! .ti ! ! ! /h-DIRECTIO!~ SEPARATION (C-4) E ! .00! ! E ! ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! R ! .000 .099 .093 .000 ! R -ADU! .000 .081 .086 .000 ! T ! .424 .250 .000 .000 ! L• ! .046 .000 .125 .000 ! N-S V/C=.474 E-W V/C=.125 TOTAL AMBER=.100 MINIMUM V/C=.050 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! - - ! 3036 ! SOUTH ! 9.0 7,6.4 .0 123 462 0 SOUTH- NORTH ! 3402 NORTH ! .0 76.4 99.0 ! 0 272 52 ! WEST ! 930 ! WEST ! 22.6 .0 31.6 ! 265 0 206 1 EAST ! 0 ! EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 o'! H11 --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 10: 3: 6 INTERSECTION : Bull Mtn Road at Pa cific Hig wa + ` VOLUMES : ?.r71Jt'o -Fb'l. al~ l'~hIL ~►~w METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: b:bull_pac !PHASE !PH ASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C-D ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 77% APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WI DTH ! - 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 ! 2 ! T. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! 3 ! L•.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT L• T R ! L• T R ! SOUTH ! 88 1677 0 1765 ! 77°s 7796 0% ! C-D C-•D NORTH ! 0 990 200. 1190 ! 096 50% 2396 ! A A ! WEST ! 181 0 200 G81 ! 77% 096 55-°i ! C-D A ! EAST ! 0 0 0 0 ! 0% 096 096 ! APPR! TRKS+. !Y-•WLK!PEDS? \O! ! PHASING 5.0001 o! ! S N ! 5.0%! ! ! !N/S-TURN PHASE W/O OVERLAP SC-2) ! W ! 5.0-°0! ! W ! ! !E/Gv-DIRECTION SEPARATION (C-4) ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ! MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! R ! .000 .111 .111 .000 ! R T -ADJ! .000 .089 .103 .000 ! ! .466 .275 .000 .000 ! L ! .051 .000 .154 .000 ! N-S V/C=.516 E-W V/C=.154 TOTAL AMBER=.100 MINIMUM V/C=.050 r r E77 ! LEEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE LEG ! AT LOS C APPR ! L T R! L T R SOUTH! 2999 SOUTH ! 8.2 75.1 .0 ! 137 523 0 ! NORTH 3398 NORTH ! .0 75.1 99.8 ! 0 309 56 ! WEST ! 983 ! WEST ! 24.8 • .0 32.9 ! 318 0 242 ! EAST ! 0 ! t EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 0 ! --SIGNALIZE D INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 7:31:27 INTERSECTION: Brill Mtn Road at Pacific Highway VOLUMES: 1 Pf^ Pt-e4,Y- A>1AX! METRO SIZE: 500,000 ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !.PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 1 1 ! I 1 I 1 k•Y.r:P:t.:ktik7t ~;Jc+; ~;t!c7;:kt!:;'::'::'::':+: 1 ! 1 I I 1 I * t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 68% y 1 1 I 1 ! I I y APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ----1- 1 ! T_. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT L T R L T R! ! - ! ! SOUTH 112 1403 0 1515 G8 6 59•`16 0 0 ! C B ! NORTH ! 0 1675 330 2005 ! 096 681, 316 ! C WEST i 13° 0 72 2 10 61 0 0 0 51, ' B . . _ EAST ! 0°6 ! . 0 0 0 0 0`-b 0% 1 E ? 1 ?l7~ ! Si G ! APPR! TRKZ P DS 1 .Y-: T _ 0. , IS ! 5. 096! S i - ! ! ! ! 5.00! ! ! - !`;IS--TURN PY,-SE P./O OVERLAP (C 21 ! W ! 5.00! 1:11 RECTION SEPARATION E 00-! o ! - ' ' /C VALUES APPROACH X 'T ONE SOUTH 0RTH WEST EAST ! 1 R .040 .000 ! R A DJ 000 ' C,9 .036 .000 ! .390 .000 .000 ! .064 ^00 .000 N-1-1 V/C= . 530 E-W 11-- =AL AMBER=.100 ~;I^.'U'`S V/C=. =;0 ' ' ! . MOVE STORAGE LEG NIE ! -TME AVAIL (SECS) . LEG ! AT SOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L' T R ! SOUTH ! 3826 ! SOUTH ! 12.0 86.7 .0 ! 168 325 C ! NORTH 4160 ! NORTH ! .0 86.7 96.0 ! 0 387 110 WEST ! 764 ! WEST ! 9.3 .0 21.3 106 Q 99 ! EAST ! 0 ! 0 ! EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 IN ' --SIGNALIZE D INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 7:32:33 INTERSECTIO VOLUMES : N: Bull Mtn Road at Pac fic Highway ITF ~ ~t^~~1G A&jLt 'FAd . -e E(OS y!at S METRO SIZE: _ 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: !PHASE !P HASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 I I ! ! I I I 1 1 * ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL * C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 685% ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! TANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! - 1 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ' MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION i MOVEMENT LOS APPR L T R TOT ! L T. R! L T R SOUTH ! 120 1403 C 1523 ! 6890 599; 0% ! C B ! NORT?'• ! 0 1675 356 2031 ! C°a 6E 6 13% ! C A ! ^ST 150 0 76 226 ! 65% 5496 ! B A _,.cT o 0 0 c 0° o VSO ! ^ G 1PP :K 4 W? ?i: PF' S? NO: PHASIN 0"s S ! ! PHASE W/O O\'ERL:~P (C-2) W ! ! F. % 1 ?IRLCTION SEPARArTON (C• : ) ! :.PPROACli V/C VALUES 1,0VE ! SOUT_' NORTH WEST EAST R ! .000 .198 .042 .000 R -ADJ! .000 .183 .038 .000 T ! .390 .465 .000 .000 ! L ! .069 .000 .048 .000 ! N- S V!C= .534 E-W V; C=.050 TOTAL AMBER=- 100 MINI?1UM V/C= .050 , ! rUr RAGE L'EG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS).! :7 LFG AT LOS C! APPR ! L T R! L T R SOU'_.". ! 3811 SOUTH ! 12.7 86.0 .0 ! 179 331 0 NORTH ! 4172 ! FORTH ! .0 86.0 95.3 ! 0 395 122 ! ?PEST ! 817 ! [TEST ! 9.2 .0 22.0 ! 115 0 103 ! !7:k ST 0 ! EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 0 ! --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - -SIGCAP--- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 7:33:19 INTERSECTION: Bull. Mtn•Roa at Pacific H}'ghw VOLUMES : IIIAFR~ J PM Pv*,U-Aov& METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 i i ! ! 1 1 ! ! t I 1 :k ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL * C-D ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 7696 1 _ 1 t I 1 I 1 * aat* as y;i; * i a;l* i * * APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST L-ANE ! - + MOVE WIDTH - MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WI DTH i 1 ! 2 1 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! .0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0, .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLU MES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L• T R L T R! SOUTH i 146 1543 0 1689 ! 76% 6500 00 ! C-D B NORTH ! 0 1845 444 2289 ! 0 760 39 0 ! C-D itir."iT I 1 91 0 94 285 ! 76 u U 0 6000- ! C'=-D ; ! EAST ! 0 0 0 C! 090 0-- 00 ! I ^ TAT T: + I + + ' 1 P R! TRk:S l PEDS? \O PIA sT\ G 00 ! ! S ! ! 5.0°x! ! ! I'S, URN R Pt 1'E 017 OVER LAP h ! 5.00! ! t _ L1 1 ^t/i~:..TP.ECTIO\ ^EF A;;:_T'1"0", -E ( ! C PPR0ACI V/C VALUES , `LOVE ! S0U.TH '\ORTH W F S T 1 R .0 00 .247 .052 000 + R AD J! 0001 .227 .046 .000 ! T ! 429 -12 .000 .000 L ! .084 .000 .061 .,000 X-- S t'/C= . 596 t' 11 \'/C=. 061 TOTAL AMBER=.100 °'T" TML'Yj ' ' v5,, ! LEG VOLT 'ME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS) ! MOVE S .I O RAGF ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R! SOUTH ! 3752 ! SOUTH ! 13.8 84.2 .0 ! 215 384 0 ! :FORTH ! 4161 ! NNORTH ! .0 84.2 94.2 ! 0 459 159 ! WEST ! 905 ! WEST ! 10.0 .0 23.8 ! 146 0 126 ! EAST ' 0 ! EAST ! .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 0 ! 1ss ` Al~ *j 4W L+ i E: fii n s x 9 ~1 Bull Min , Road near p-d P,,v Pacific h,,,,, Highway Robert A550CIA 1 E5 INC. MM CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER M P~~a~ ~ow R 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS (05JAN92) 4/15/1994 10: 3:55 INTERSECTION c : Bull Mtn Road at P ific Hi " hwa A f VOLUMES: jt &,F )LUsTw&) I PM 51117x- 6 A-s l' METRO SIZE: 500,000-1- ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: b:bull_pac !PHASE !PH ASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 I i I I I I i * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL- C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 69% I I I I ! ! ! is t. ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L I T R TOT ! L T R! L T R! ----------------------!-------------------'---------------I SOUTH ! 122 1403 0 1525 ! 690 6096 0b ! C B ! NORTH ! 0 1675 362 2037 ! 0 0 6996 3300- ! C A ! WEST ! 179 0 100 279 ! 690 096 61w ! C B ! EAST ! 0 0 0 0 ! 00 096 0°s ! ! APPR! TR!:S! '.1;-:~LK!PEDS? NO! PHASING ' 1----- 5.00! U . ! S ! , , ! 5.0°0! ! 1 ! ! !N/S-T URN PHASE K/O OVERLAP (C-2)! 5.00 ! W - ! !E/W--D IRECTION SEP--RjTTO\ (C-4) . T7 I 016 E ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE SOUTH ;FORTH. WEST EAST ' R ! .000 .201 .056 .000 ! R -ADJ'. .000 .184 .049 .000 ! T ! .390 .465 .000 .000 ! L ! .070 .000 .057 .000 N-S V/C=.535 F-W V/C=.057 TOTAL AMBER=.100 MINIMUM V/C=.050 LEG VOLUME ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! lamb, SOUTH ! 3787 IF NORTH ! 4152 ! WEST ! 875 ! EAST ! 0 ! ! TIME APPR ! L• SOUTH ! 12.8 NORTH ! .0 WEST ! 10.4 EAST ! .0 AVAIL T 84.8 84.8 .0 .0 (SECS)! R ! 95.2 ! 23.2 ! .0 ! MOVE STORAGE ! L T R ! - 182 343 0 ! 0 409 125 ! 136 0 134 ! 0 0 0 ! t --SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION --SIGCAP-- VERS(05JAN92) 4/15/1994 10: 4:34 INTERSECTION: Bull Mtn Road at Pacific H.g way VOLUMES : f0hil `r, I pm It nal-4 METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: R Keech FILE NAME: b:bull_pac !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G=108 Y= 12 ! 1 t I 1 1 I * * * SERVICE LEVEL C-D 1 1 ! ! ! ! ! 1 , ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 76% ! ! SOUTH APPROACH LANE NORTH GEOMETRY ! WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! T.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 .0 12 0 0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 . . L.. 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOL UMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R! L• T R SOUTH ! 1-18 1543 0 1691 ! 76% 65". 096 ! C-D B - ! C-D A ` ' NORTH ! 0 1845 45 ^ 2295 ! 0% o 39 % ! 76 - WEST 0 0 1i 8 238 ! 530- ! 0 76•°a ! A C- D ^AS v 0 0 0! 0% 0% ! ! 0% AFFR! TRk: 03 !X--WT .K ! PEDS? NO! PHASING N ! 5. C%! ! \ ! - - ! !N/S-T URN PHASE W/O OVERLAP (C-2) ! W ! 5.0%! ' W ! ! !E/W-D IRECTION SEPARATION (C-4)! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ! MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! R ! .000 .250 .066 .000 R -ADJ! .000 .231 .058 .000 T ! .429 .512 .000 .000 ! L ! .085 .000 .038 .000 ! N-S V/C= .598 E-W V/C=.058 TOTAL AMBER=.100 MINIMUM V/C=.050 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L• T R ! SOUTH ! 3791 ! SOUTH ! 14.0 84.5 .0 ! 218 381 0 ! NORTH ! 4107 ! NORTH ! .0 84.5 94.0 ! 0 455 163 ! WEST ! 868 ! WEST ! 9•.5 .0 23.5 ! 92 0 158 ! EAST ! 0 ! EAST .0 .0 .0 ! 0 0 0 ! E OVERSIZED DOCUMENTS 5;11,el 9 MEETING DATE: 611' AGE N'DA SEA 35MM ROLL FILM i:\records\microflm\targets\osdocccm.doc i A- I ~-~q R-3.5 (PD) A 12 m "5H -T 411 Chapter 18.64 e 0 Sections: C-P: PROFESSIONAL/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 18.64.010 Purpose 18.64.020 Procedures and Approval Process' 18.64.030 Permitted Uses 18.64.040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 18.130) 18.64.050 Dimensional Requirements 18.64.060 Additional Requirements -111 18.64.010 Purpose 4 +Ik 0UT(U-1,0 A. The purpose of the C-P zoning district is: 1. To provide for groups of businesses and offices in centers; 2. To accommodate the location of intermediate uses between residential. districts and areas of more intense development; 3. To provide opportunities for employment and for business and professional services in close proximity to residential neighborhoods and major transportation facilities; 4. To expand the City's economic potential; 5. To provide a range of compatible and supportive uses; and 6. To locate office employment where it can support other commercial uses. B. The trade area will vary and may extend outside the community. This zone is intended to implement the policies and criteria set forth in the comprehensive plan. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.64.020 Procedures and Approval Process A. A permitted use, Section 18.64.030, is a use which is allowed outright, but is subject to all applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use outright, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43, Unlisted Use. B. A conditional use, Section 18.64.040, is a use the approval of which is discretionary with the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria for approval are set forth in Chapter 18.130, Conditional Use. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43, Unlisted Use. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89- 06; Ord. 83-52) Revised 1/17/91 Page 130 18.64.030 Permitted Uses A. Permitted u ses in the C-P district are as follows: 1. Civic use types: P b a. u lic agency administrative services; b. Cultural exhibits and library services; C. Public support facilities; d. Lodges, fraternal and civic assembly; e. Parking facilities; f. Postal services; and g. Public safety services; ^ 2. Commercial use types: a. Animal sales and services: (i) Grooming; and (ii) Veterinary, small animals; b. Building maintenance services; C. Business equipment sales and services; d. Business support services; e Co i ti i . mmun ca on serv ces; f. Children's day care; g. Financial, insurance, and real estate services; h. Medical and dental services; i. Participation sports and recreation: (i) Indoor; and (ii) outdoor (not to exceed ten percent of the--total square footage within the office complex); j. Personal services, general; k. Professional and administrative services; 2111~ Revised 1/17/91 Page 131 1. Research services; and M. The following uses, separately or in combination, shall not exceed a total of 20 percent of the entire square footage within the development complex: (i) Convenience sales and personal services; (ii) Eating and drinking establishments; and (iii) Retail sales, general; 3. Residential use types: a. Multiple-family residential' units as a mixed use in conjunction, developed at R-40+ standards, with a comarcial development, only in the CP District within the Tigard Triangle and the Bull Mountain Road District, on or above the second floor of the structure; b. Home occupations subject to provisions of Chapter 18.142; C. Family day care; 4. Transient-lodging/restaurant (on the same parcel); 5. Temporary use; 6. Fuel tank; or 7. Accessory structures. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 86-08; Ord. 85-32; Ord. 84-73; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) 18.64.040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 18.130) A. Conditional uses in the C-P district are as follows: 1. Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (ODOT) and FAA; 2. Hospitals; 3. Utilities; and 4. Religious Assemblies. (Ord. 92-15;, Ord. 89-06; Ord. 85-32; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) 18.64.050 Dimensional Requirements A. Dimensional requirements in the C-P district are as follows: 1. The minimum lot area shall be 6,000 square feet; 2. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet; 3. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, the minimum setback requirements are as follows: a. There shall be _no minimum front yard setback requirement; however, conditions in Chapters 18.100 and 18.102 must be met; Aft Revised 05/05/92 Page 132 0 b. On corner lots and through lots, there shall be no minimum setback requirement; however, the provisions or Chapter 18.102 must be satisfied; C. No side yard setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the C-P zone abuts a residential 'zoning district; d. No rear yard setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the C-P zone abuts a residential zoning district; and e. All building separations shall meet all Uniform Building Code requirements; 4. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98, no building in the C-P zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height; 5. The maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including all buildings and impervious surfaces; and 6. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 85-32; Ord. 84-30; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) 18.64.060 Additional Requirements A. Addi tional requirements in the C-P district are as follows: 1. Overlay Districts, Chapters 18.80 Planned Development, 18.82 Historic Overlay District, and 18.84 Sensitive Lands; 2. Supplemental Provisions, Chapters 18.90 Environmental Performance Standards, 18.92 Density Computations, 18.94 Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations, 18.96 Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions, 18.98 Building Height Limitations: Exceptions, 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas, 18.104 Fuel Tank Installations, 18.106 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements, 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation, and 18.114 Signs; 3. Site Development Review, Chapter 18.120; 4. Development and Administration, Chapters 18.130 Conditional Use, 18.132 Nonconforming Situations, 18.134 Variance, 18.140 Temporary Uses, 18.142 Home Occupations, 18.144 Accessory Structures, 18.146 Flexible Setback Standards, and 18.150 Tree Removal; and 5. Land Division and Development Standards, Chapters 18.160 Land Division.: Subdivision, 18.162 Land Division: Land Partitioning - Lot Line Adjustment, and 18.164 Street and Utility Improvement Standards. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) U. T t Revised 1/17/91 Page 133 r I, rf Chapter 18.22 AMENDMENTS TO THE TITLE AND MAP 0 Sections: 18.22..010 Purpose 18.22.020 Legislative Amendments to this Title and Map 18.22.030 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Procedures 18.22.040 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Standards for Making the Decision 18.22.050 Conditions of Approval 18.22.060 Record of Amendments 18.22.010 Purpose A. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth the standard and propose governing legislative and quasi-judicial amendments to this title and the zoning district map. I 1. B. Amendments may be necessary from time to time to refract- changing community conditions, needs and desires, to correct mistakes or to address changes in the law. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.22.020 Legislative Amendments to this Title and Hap A. Legislative amendments to this title and to the map shall be in accordance with the procedures and standards set forth in Chapter 18.30. .(Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.22.030 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Procedures A. Quasi-judicial amendments to this title and to the map shall be in accordance with the procedures set forth in this title and the following: 1. The Commission shall decide zone change applications which do not involver comprehensive plan map amendments as provided by Section 18.32.090.0.3. A petition for review by the Council may be filed as provided by Section 18.32.310.B; 2. The Commission shall make a recommendation to the Council on an application for a comprehensive plan map amendment; and 3. The Commission shall make a recommendation to the Council on a zone change application which also involves a concurrent application for a comprehensive plan map amendment. The Council shall decide the applications on the record as provided by Section 18.32.320.B. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18_._22_.040 -Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Standards for Making the Decision A. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: Revised 02/27/89 Page 13- I 1. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designation and; the change will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the community; 2. The statewide planning goals adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197, until acknowledgment of the comprehensive plan and ordinances; 3. The applicable standards o£ any provision of this code or, other applicable implementing ordinance; and 4. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.22.050 Conditions of Approval A. A quasi-judicial decision may be for denial, approval, or approval with conditions as provided by Section 18.32.250.p. B. A legislative decision may be approved or denied. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.22.060 Record of Amendments. A. The Director shall maintain a record of amendments to the text and map of this title in a format convenient for the use of the public and in accordance with Section 18.40.020 (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) ~..-Gt-~tG `~-P,y/"/ ✓Yi (mil Revised 02/27/89 page 4- Chapter 18.62 C-G: GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 0 Sections: 18.62.010 Purpose 18.62.020 Procedures and Approval Process 18.62.030 Permitted Uses 18.62.040 Conditional uses (See Chapter 18.130) 18.62.050 Dimensional Requirements 18.62.060 Additional Requirements 18.62.010 Purpose bloc -~PS~~ n-► on L lay WhI A. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services: 1. The uses classified as general commercial may involve drive-in _ services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, . wholesale and re i i , pa r serv ces, or provide services to the traveling public; 2. The uses range from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and 3. It is intended that these uses be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 18.62.020 Procedures and Approval Process A. A permitted use, Section 18.62.030, is a use which is allowed outright but , is subject to applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43, Unlisted Use. B. A conditional use, Section 18.62.040, is a use the approval of which is discretionary with the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria for approval are set forth in Chapter 18.130, Conditional Use. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43, Unlisted Use. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89- 06; Ord. 83-52) 18.62.030 Permitted Uses A. Permitted uses in the C-G district are as follows: 1. Civic use types: a. Public agency administrative services; ~E Revised 1/17/91 Page 125 b. Cultural exhibits and library services; C. Public support facilities; d. • Lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly; e. Parking facilities; f. Postal services; and g. Public safety facilities; 2., Commercial use types: a. Agricultural sales; b. Amusement enterprises; C. Animal sales and services; (i) Grooming; and (ii) Veterinary, small animalc; d. Automotive and equipment: (i) Cleaning; (ii) Repairs, light equipment; and (iii) Sales/rentals, light equipment e. Business support services; f. Convenience sales and personal services; g. Children's day care; h. Eating and drinking establishments; i. Financial, insurance, and real estate services; j. Food and beverage retail sales; k. Funeral and internment services: (i ) Cremating; and (ii) Undertaking; 1. General retail sales; • Revised 1/17/51 -Page 126 M. Medical and dental services; n. Participation sports and recreation: (i) Indoor; and _ i ( i) Outdoor; o. Personal services, general; P. Professional and administrative services; q. Consumer repair services; r'. Rel.igious assembly; S. Spectator sports and entertainment facilities; and t. Transient lodging; y 3. Home occupations subject to provisions of Chapter 18.142; 4. A single-family unit provided that is located on the same.-site with a permitted use in Section 18.62.030 or Section 18.62.040 and-is occupied exclusively by a caretaker or superintendent of the permitted use and family; 5. Family day care; 6. Temporary use; 7. Fuel tank; or 8. Accessory structures. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 87-04; Ord. 86-08; Ord. 85-07; Ord. 84-73; Ord. Ord. 83-52) 18.62.040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 18.130) A. Conditional uses in the C-G district are as follows: 1. Adult entertainment; 2. Automotive and equipment: a. Fleet storage;, b. Sales/rental, farm equipment; C. Sales/rental, heavy equipment, and d. Storage, recreational vehicles, and boats; 3. Wholesaling, storage, and distribution: i. Miniwarehouses; 4. Utilities; 5. Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (ODOT) and the FAA: Revised 1/17/91 Page 127 6. Hospitals; 7. Spectator sport facilities; and 8. Vehicle fuel sales. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 40 18.62.050 Dimensional Requirements A. Dimensional requirements in the C-G district are as follows: 1. There is no minimum lot area required; 2. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet; 3. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, the minimum setback requirements are as follows: a. There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement; - however, conditions in Section 18.102 and Chapter 18.100 must be met; b. On corner lots and through lots there shall be no minimum setback requirement; however, the provisions of Chapter 18.1.02 must be satisfied; C. No side yard setback shall be required, except 20 feet shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning, district; and d. No rear yard setback shall be required, except 20 feet shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district; 4. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98, no building in a C-G zone shall exceed 45 feet; 5. The maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including all buildings and impervious surfaces; and 6. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 85-32; Ord. 84-30; Ord. 84-29; Ord. 83-52) 18.62.060 Additional Requirements A. Additional requirements in the C-G district are as follows: 1. Overlay Districts, Chapters 18.80 Planned Development, 18.82 Historic Overlay District, and*18.84 Sensitive Lands; 2. Supplemental Provisions, Chapters 18.90 Environmental Performance Standards, 18.92 Density Computations, 18.94 Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations, 18.96 Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions, 18.98 Building Height Limitations: Exceptions, 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas, 18.104 Fual Tank Installations, 18.106 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements, 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation, and 18.114 Signs; 3. Site Development Review, Chapter 18.120; Revised 1/17/91 Page 128 4. Development and Administration, Chapters 18.130 Conditional Use, 18.132 Nonconforming Situations, 18.134 Variance, 18.140 Temporary Uses, 18.142 Home occupations, 18.144 Accessory Structures, 18.146 Flexible Setback Standards, and 18.150 Tree Removal; and 5. Land Division and Development Standards, Chapters 18.160 Land Division: Subdivision, 18.162 Land Division: Land Partitioning - Lot Line Adjustment, and 18.164 Street and Utility-Improvement Standards. (Ord. 90-41; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) AV Revised 1/17/91 Page 129 AGENDA ITEM # ~ 'l For Agenda of 6-2$-1994 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Award construction contract for the Park / Watkins Shoulder Improvements PREPARED BY: G Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Award the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Kerr Contractors, Inc..for the Park / Watkins Shoulder Improvements project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award the contract to Kerr Contractors, Inc. and authorize the City Administrator to sign the contract. Kerr Contractors has been in the construction business for several years and is qualified to construct this project. They have completed previous projects for the City. INFORMATION SUMMARY The project will construct a paved shoulder by widening the existing pavement 0 on the north side of Park Street, from Grant Avenue to Watkins Avenue, and on the east side of Watkins, from Park Street to Fairhaven Street. The paved shoulder will provide a 5' wide pedestrian/bike path, striped off from the two travel lanes. Seven bids were open on June 7, 1994 for the project. The bid results are as follows: Kerr Contractors, Tualatin $ 50,125.50 Benge Construction, Tualatin $ 50,929.75 Morse Brothers, Sherwood $ 54,267.00 Eagle-Elsner, Tigard $ 55,420.50 Western Paving & Const., Portland $ 56,470.00 Oregon Underground, Clackamas $ 57,294.00 Dycon Corp, Tigard $ 67,875.00 On May 10, 1994 the Council approved funding of $51,000 for this project and authorized advertising the project for bids. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES Funding for this project is provided from the 93/94 Capital Improvement Projects budget. ' ga\park-wat.ss