The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 01/25/1994 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is .available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of That agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. Times noted are estimated: it is recommended that persons Interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign In on the testimony sign-in sheet. &JIness agenda items can bs heard in a= order afl'er 7:30 Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the ,'Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TGrD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaq. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrznge for the following services: 0 Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf}. SEE ATTACK IED AGEN12A COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY'25, 1994 - PAGE 1 12 IN_ TIGARD CI`T'Y COUNCIL JANILlLA?fY ma, ;19195 AGENDA • S a UDY MEETING (5:313 p.m.) . • Review of Basics: Water System -1. BUSINESS MEETING (3:30 p.m.) 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll ',,all 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL COMMUNIIT'f DEVELOPMENT WEEK (MARCH S - APRIL 3,10-94) • Mayor Edwards 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) ;::::dvE::'T AGENDA: 71 ese items are considered Yo be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 1 4.1 Dedication of Reserve Strips as Right of Way - Resolution No. 94-.!2_1 5. PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED FROM TIME DECEMBER 14,1993 COUNCIL MEETING): COMPREHENSIVE PLANT AMENDMENT - CIA 93-0009/ZON 93- 0003/5DR 93-0014/CUP 9-3 02, ML.P 93-0013 ALBERTSON'S INIC./Duncombe. A request for the following development approvals: 1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to redesignate approximately eight acres of a 12 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on tax lot 200 and to redesignate an approximately 5.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium-High Density Residential on tax lot 100. Zone changes accompanying the above plan changes includes a zone change from R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (Community Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25- units/acre); 2) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 53,950 square foot multiple-use commercial retail building; 3) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 4,000 square foot gasoline station; 4) Minor Lana Partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately eight acres and four acres each. LOCATION: Souther and northeast quadrants of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Walnut Street. a. Continue Public Hearing is. Declara~jons or Challenges C. City Attorney Report d. Staff Report (Continued to next page...) COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 25. 1994 - PAGE 9 e. Public Testimony Council heard public testimony on December 14, 1994. During the hearing, the City Council requested both sides (opponents and proponents) present rebuttal remarks In writing and submit them to the City Recorder no later than January 14, 1994. f. Council Questions/Comments g. Staff Recommendation h. Close Public Wearing i. Coun ii Considal t-alan - Ordinance No. 93-01 6. ZONE CHANliaE ANNEXATION ZCA 93-0003 - JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH. Location: South of S.W. Spruce Street at the easterly corner of S.W. Hall boulevard. A request to annex two parcels consisting of approximately 1.89 acres to the City of Tigard and to change the zone from Washington County R-5 (Residential, 5 units/acre) and R-9 (Residential, 9 units/acre) to the City of Tigard R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre). a. Cpen Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges 0. OL011 c PUI i d. Public Testimony Proponents (In favor of the requested annexation and zone change.) Opponents (Opposed to the requested annexation and zone change.) Rebuttal (Opponents/Proponents e. Council Questions/Comments f. Staff Recommendation g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration - Resolution No. 93-i!>2- Ordinance No. 93-f?2 a 7. VACATION OF A PORTION OF S.W. 79TH AVENUE, AN UNNAMED 20-FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY EAST OF S.W. 79TH AVENUE, AND THE SUBDIVISION PLAT TWIN OAKS LANE. The request was initiated by the City of Tigard Council on November 23, 1993, on behalf of Hal Keever of W&H Pacific for Costco Wholesale. a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges C. 'Staff Report d. Public Testimony Proponents (in favor of the requested vacation.) Opponents (Opposed to the requested vacation.) Rebuttal (Opponents/Proponents) e. Council Questions/Comments f. Staff Recommendation g. Close Public Hearing h. Council Consideration - Ordinance No. 93-_ COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 3 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS 17APh 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executi a Session under the provisions of CRS 192.860 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 10. ADJOURNMENT 0=012544 COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 4 m NINE f Council Agenda. Item , 17 C 1 2: 31 c 0 ILK 9 I L MING mrA7I Tzs - JANUARY 25, 1994 • Meeting was called to order at 5:37 p.m. by Mayor Edwards. 1. RDLL t~►I,L Council Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Judy Fessler, Wendi Conover Hawley, Paul Hunt, and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; .Jim Coleman, Legal Counsel; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Community :°elations Coordinator= Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Ed Wegner, Maintenance Services Director; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. • , ' gI I+TaHG (5:30 p.m.) • Review of Basics: Water System Mr. Randy Volk and Mr. Mike Miller of the Tigard Water Department reviewed the basics of the water systems, (See material distributed to the City Council which is now on file with the Council racket material.) Agh Mr. Volk narrated a slide presentation of the overall water system (i.e., map of boundaries, equipment, reservoirs, technology, pump stations, well locations). Issr. Miller reviewed water supply: Clackamas River (through Lake Oswego contract) and Bull Run (available through Portland contract). Water shortage situations were diacussed briefly. There is not enough impoundment at Bull Run for full summer and into the fall use if the area experiences a dry year. Consumption history was also reviewed. Mr. Miller described the Engineering Report which is the backbone of future plans for expansion. He reviewed the pipeline maps and areas where growth is expected. Water quality issues were reviewed; the responsibility for the quality, within EPA guidelines, is borne by the Water-Department for its customers. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25,, 1994 - PAGE 1 Overall, the system is in good shape. Maim issues which need work include decisions on the capital improvement cease Fenn / e+r~+vr.~1~1~ 1 m~„e~ 7 n~n7rt~~ ~.$.t~ .°.a»~, af' r.X r -r... ~ 7- r a • • Goal Setting: Consensus of Council was to direct City Administrator to proceed with goal-setting process, it is anticipated that a Council workshop will be scheduled in February. • 130th Avenue Extension: City Engineer Wooley reported memo some neighbors near S.W. 130th have expressed concerns/objections to the bridge crossing at Summerlake Park. This project has.been on the transportation plan and design work was to be funded this year. After discussion, Council directed the City Engineer to solicit input from the CIT membership for an opportunity to hear from those for and against the connection. It is anticipated that this can be placed on a March CIT agenda. • Meeting process. Legal Counsel Coleman'reviewed options for continuation of the Albertson's public hearing which _ is scheduled for the business agenda. If the Council determines that it appears that a lot of people did not get a full opportunity to be heard in an evidentiary hearing, there is the possibility that this issue could be remanded to the Planning Commission for another hearing. Also, Council received several hundred pages of written information concerning this hearing item. Much of this information had not been submitted to the Planning Commission as they were making their decision. Councilor Fessler noted concern with sending the issue back to the Planning Commission without first identifying specific areas the Council would like the Commission to review. Legal Counsel and staff also advised that if the Council had specific items they would like the Planning Commission to review, it would be helpful. Legal Counsel Coleman advised he would explain the remand process during the business meeting noting the issue of remand has been raised. The decision to remand must be determined by the Council. • Request by Wetlands Conservancy: City Administrator Reilly reviewed a January 15, 1994, letter (on file with the Council packet material) from Jack Broome, Properties Director of The Wetlanda Conservancy (TWC). The Council agreed to proceed with the donation of ownership of the Knex property to TWC as requested. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HISUTES = °JP_t?UARY 25, 1994 - PAGB 2 I IBM! !I lIliilliiI 111 11111111111111 7:20 p.m. Council meeting recessed. a 7t 30 n _ 111 _ f, oLln_ 0 1 H1~~1$ T8Q~1. meeting called tv yr rAwvi • 2. r.~xramION: NATIQN Y COMMITY DEVEL mum 3 EIC • Mayor Edwards proclaimed March 8 to April 3, 1994 an National Community Development Week in Tigard. 3. $,gBITORo S ,AGENDA • Jack~Polans, 16000 S.W. Queen Victoria Place, King City, OR 97224 asked Council to discontinue (by agreement) annexation efforts for the Walnut Island area for another year or two. Mayor Edwards advised no annexation plans were imminent. He advised it would be inappropriate for the Council to enter into an agreement as Mr. Polans outlined without first holding a public hearing. Councilor Schwartz added that development, if desired, could occur in the area under County zoning designations. it is likely that the Walnut area's zoning is quite similar to the City of Tigard's zoning. in real-onse to Mr. Polans# furtier concerns about staff time which has been spent in studying the Walnut Island annexation, Mayor Edwards reiterated that there was no Ask 1P specific or immediate timeline for annexation planned for this area. 4. NSEMT AGENM: Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to approve the following Consent Agenda item: 4.1 Dedication of Reserve Strips as Right of Way - Resolution No. 94°~ Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 5. POELIC ING ~CONTIId[TED ]FROM DECVRLMgR 14~ 1993 COiTNCI~ MEET' S : 99MEMUM PAGAN DENT - CPA 93-0009/Z0N 93- ...aas~~ rawaawa. X00 ODE 93- ® 1 OOP 93-®002/MhP 93-0013 AYdVER9.'SONIS A request for the following development approvals: 1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to redesignate approximately eight acres of a 12 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on tax lot 200 and to redesignate an approximately 6.93 acre parcel from ?neighborhood Commercial to Medium-High Density Residential on tax lot 100. Zone changes accompanying the above plan changes includes a zone change from R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (community Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R- CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 3 JI III! 25 "R__id.ntial, 25 unatiseacrej; 2) site Development Review Aft~ approval to allow the construction of a 53,950 square foot multiple-use commercial retail building; 3) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 4,000 square foot gasoline station; 4) Minor Land Partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately eight acres and four acres each. LOCATION: southeast and northeast quadrants -of the intersection of SW Sch_lls Ferry Road and Sans Walnut street. a. Mayor Edwards advised that the public hearing was continued from December 14, 1993. b. Declarations or Challenges - Councilor Fessler advised she was contacted by Carol Mastrofini. Councilor Fessler said she gave M's. Mastrofini instructions on how to forward information for the record. - Councilor Hunt advised he visited the site. - Councilor Hawley advised she 'also had been contacted by Carol Mastrofini. Councilor Hawley advised Ms. Mastrofini to contact the City Administrator to answer questions on the quasi- judicial meeting process. C. City Attorney Report: Legal Counsel Coleman presented a review of process and options at this point in the proceeding. The Council hearing was for the purpose of reviewing the Planning Commission decision. it appears that.a number of people, for a variety of reasons, did not receive notice or have an opportunity to participate at the Planning Commission level. The City Council can take public testimony, reserving deliberations until after the public testimony portion has been closed. The Council may decide, under certain circumstances, to take new evidence into consideration as they review. in this instance, testimony was received on December 14, 1994, at which time more evidence was submitted to the City Council. Council continued the hearing to January 25, 1994, requesting that rebuttal remarks be submitted in writing by January 14, 1994. The question of remand has been raised. Council does have as an option to remand to the Planning Commission, if the Council determines that a substantial. amount of new information has been presented that the Commission did not have an opportunity to review. ?legal Counsel Coleman recommended the Council consider the remand question at this time rather than proceeding through the hearing process and then co:isidering the remand question. A remand is. allowable through Code CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 4 117 provisions it _ council deter-m-2 as iL are vsv have bve®va .rob+aw e. in i.aa u m+.....~.v..ov in presenting the evidence or if there is substantial new evidence • Discussion of remand questions _ -councilor Hawley advised she was in favor of remanding this issue to the Planning Commission. She noted Planning Commission should have the opportunity, with the new evidence, to re vn6ider their recommendation as to. whether or not this development proposal meets the design guidelines outlined in the Code. - Councilor Hunt said he was.against a remand. The information did not appear to be substantially new. He advised he would prefer that the Council make a decision tonight. - Councilor Hawley added that this was the first application for use of the Community Commercial Code provisions. She reiterated that she would prefer a thorough Planning commission review. - Councilor Schwartz advised he was also in favor of a remand to the Planning Commission. He said he agreed with Councilor Hawley that much new evidence had been presented which had not been before the Planning Commission. - Councilor Fessler referred to the spirit and vision of the plan for a community commercial development. She noted, that if the Planning Commission was going to be asked to review this development again, the Council should give them specific areas to review. For example, does the size, scale and site design carry forth the spirit of the Community Commercial zoning designation? Councilor Schwartz advised there.was so much new evidence, that the Planning Commission would need to review the entire record. He recommended all information/evidence received by the Council be included in the Commission's review. Councilor Hawley noted sho was willing give direction to the Planning Commission; i.e., Have design rsquirements been met? She referred to giving specifics to assist the Planing Commission to determine whether the proposed development promotes the vision of the Code. CITE' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 5 n fte_ r3ianuas3 on gha folloWing motion was MCI&! Motion by Councilor Schwartz, "seconded by Councilor Hawley, to remand this proposal to the Planning slc12. ds-Siori; all additional testimony received by the City Council shall be forrarded to the Planning commission for their review. Council discussion followed. Legal Counsel Coleman noted Y.AAt .L~ILVLYIC64itiil K.OVC.bYaM NVua.aa yv j:+ct'v'k 4V 4ha vvsiw`t.a.amJ.vs if the motion was approved. He noted, however, it is pdasib2e that the applicant will redesign and submit to the Planning Commission. If such a redesign occurs, the additional information presented at this time to the Council may not be relevant. The evidentiary hearing should be held at the Planning Commission lavel. There was discussion on notification requirements if a new application is made. Legal Counsel Coleman advised that more notice can be given; that is, additional notice outside the required 250 feet is acceptable. With respect to the quasi-judicial process, Legal Counsel Coleman reminded those present that the Council should not be contacted on an individual basis to discuss specific land use decisions. Mayor Edwards advised he would support a remand. He said he was not present on December 14, 1994, when the hearing was opened; however, he had reviewed tihe tapes and documents pertaining.to the issue. He recommended that the notification area"be expanded. A_voice vote of the motion was asked for by Mayor Edwards: The motion passed by a 3-2 vote. (Mayor Edwards, Hawley and Schwartz voted "aye"; Councilors Hunt and Fessler voted "no .10) 6. 7®. _CIHANGE AM s=10N Zt.A 93-0003 - J =HE Ib7MMUMIO~+T L n~a 182 CHURCH. 'Location: South of S.W. Spruce Street at the easterly corner of S.W. Hall boulevard. A request to annex two parcels consisting of approximately 1.59 acres to the City of Tigard and to change the zone from Washington County R-5 (Residential, 5 units/acre) and R-9 (Residential, 9 units/acre) to the City of Tigard R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre). a. Public hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. c. Community Development Director Murphy summarized the staff report. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 6 d. Public Testimony ® Proponents: • Ms. Pat Whiting read testimony (on f i le with the packet material) from Mr. Guard Rieder, Chairman of the Citizens Participation organization 4-M. No objections to the annexation were expressed,. CPO 4-M requested zoning not be any greater than R-7. _ i~= o.. YV "the fact that much of i.6A V.~u.NVl.~ NiNM the land being considered 'for annexation is designated as "Sensitive Habitat" identified by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Audubon Society Urban Wildlife Habitat Map and forested areas coincidental with water areas and wetlands. ISO Council questions or comments: In response to a question from Councilor Fessler, Mr. Murphy advised that he would see to it that this property was placed in the inventory foa- sensitive lands (or as appropriate). This inventory is being prepared by staff at the present time. f. Mr. Murphy advised staff recommended approval. g. Public hearing was closed. h. Council Consideration: RESOLUTION NO. 94-02 - A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT HA11 AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 11810 ATTACHED. (ZCA 93-0003 - JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH) Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to adopt Resolution No. 94-02.'' The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Edwards and Councilors Fessler, Hawley, Hunt and Schwartz voted yes.) ORDINANCE NO. 94-01 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 93-0003 - JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to adopt Ordinance No. 94-01. The motion was approved by a 'unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Edwards and Councilors Fessler, Hawley, Hunt and Schwartz voted yes.) , AOL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PAGE 7. VACATION A amigm OF S.W. 79TH AVffi L~ tpNI~A L~ 241-FOOT NI®~ RIG YT-CEO-NA`Y ET CF S.N. 79= AVSN ~ APIA TFL~ STTS1aIVIS QR~ ]~►LAT TMIN QM g . The request was initiated by no City of Tigard Council on November 23, 1993, on behalf of Hal Keever of W&H PacifLc for Costco Wholesale. 'a. Public hearing waa opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. CIO Community Development Director Murphy advised staff was recommending this hearing be set over to February 8, 1994, to cure problems with newspaper publication for this hearing item. d. Notion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Fessler, to continue thie hearing to the February 8, 1994 City Council meeting. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Edwards and Councilors Fessler, Hawley, Hunt and Schwartz voted yes.) 8. KW-AGF0DA ITF21ds - None 9. COTIVM SESSION: Cancelled. o.. RT - _ : 8:20 p.m. ttB7 bat-herine Wheatley, City R order yor, of igaid te: C1 Ll =0125.94 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 25, 1994 - PACE 8 AQE~lD7 A.1TE~II 1VfJe S VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE: January 25. 1994 (Umited to 2 minutes or less, please) Afth Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF i, NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC CONTACTED G I S" (~IDD f r(~t~i~f~ G iI I~rl l~ p Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount . '171 f time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral commerais to s - 5 11111 IU ms 111a v1 1t7111 may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. _ LN AGEIP ®~BYE::januaty'25.,1994 PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED FROM THE DECEMBER 149 1993 COUNCIL MEETING): COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - CPA 93-0009/ZOIN 93-0003/SDI 93-0014/CUP 93- 0002/MLP 93-0013 ALBERTSON'S IINC./Duncombe. A request for the following development approvals: 1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to redesignate approximately ei ht acres of a 12 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on tax lot 200 and to redesignate an approximately 6.53 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium- High Density Residential on tax lot 100. Zone changes accompanying the above plan changes includes a zone change from R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (Community Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre); 2) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 53,550 square foot multiple-use commercial retail building; 3) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 4,000 square foot gasoline 1 a_ •..1_ a a 1.._ .1 n ..s.~ r..~r~.eI it +P% 4aun r\r 14m of 9 r1rV•f1Y11'T1AtA l4/ stauon; 4) Minor Land Fan[uonappr c val lU Urd1d 11'a 1 G acol jjI;&I Vim IN .av ...v I.S. ce... fight acres and four acres each. LOCATION: Southeast and northeast quadrants of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Walnut Street. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS 4. r AGEMPA, fi - Proponent- - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) 9 e. A) Kw i L- Address J rasa 2- 5 s Name i ress z.t c~a/ .aim -)o? r!. oG~N (sLAr►o 'DZ Nam Name m dress Address )4f .SS Sw y i 7 1 B Ivos ~ 17X40 ,e Name _ ' C o ~S Address l u~ y J 1 E - A keE h-A Name Name ~ ~/v 1~' G v 1 G Addr-fts Address 22/ ,OND er 12-o ! LI S c.J c,J t L7-d L]9-. - 7 C . ACIA. -Z 0/97 1`l9 Name Name Address Address Name Name 1 Address Address Name Nye ~v[ o S Address Address 131 UJ Name Name 2 ress ress Cuj ' i Name Nwn® Address Address / ~s Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount Uri-Ia 6--~ .,~,.e n 6nQ try anank WA an you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time R necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. AGENDA lTti<9 ice. 6 . a e jariu-- ~n a t7 . C: a ~ p, 1994 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 93-0003 - JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH. Location: South of S.W. Spruce Street at the easterly corner of S.W. Hall boulevard. A request to annex two parcels consisting of approximately 1.89 acres to the City of Tigard and to change the zone from Washington County R-5 (Residential, 5 units/acre) and R-9 (Residential, 9 units/acre) to the City of Tigard R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre). PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS It! 111 11 il!''! 1111:11!1 ROSS, IN!, 1 111! I AGENDA rTEM KM. PLEASE PRINT Freponard - (SpeaKRlg If i FEVOUJr) Opponent - Name 2L Address Ad re Name NaMe resa Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address 1085 Name Name - - MIME Address 17 dress Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address •~e Name Nam dress Address Name Name P6S8 Address Name Name Address Address am MUM 1 PLEME ERIN! Dr~...... e = ~vjrvwnii a ii aviui ) Opponent - (Speaking Against) ` ame 8 teas dr 3 I~. 5 w - _ W►-hr I! d.0 e Address t _ sw c c~- Name Name Address Address s a teas Address FEMO Name Adaress dress Address Address Name Name Address Addross i Name Name Address Address h:\Iogin\lo\testlty I Alffik Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. AGEN®Ay1Ti:±6A t O 7 DATi`:.:Jartuary 25._ 1994 VAOATION OF A PORTION OF S.W. 79TH AVENUE, AN UNNAMED 20-FOOT WIDE FIGHT-OP- WAY EAST OF S.W. 79TH AVENUE, AND THE SUBDIVISION PLAT TWiiN OAKS LANE. The request was initiated by the City of Tigard Council on November 23, 1993, on behalf of Hal Keever of W&H Pacific for Costco Wholesale. PLEASE SIGN IN TO TESTIFY ON THE ATTACHED SHEETS lill ill'illil~~lljl~ Jill 1111, PL 9ME PRINT Proponent - (Speaking In Favor) Opponent - (Speaking Against) e Nsrt9 o o -P Address 7-1i 0 15- w 17 IF meow - - - - Name e Address Mdress Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address I e Name Address Address I Name Name IR_m _dr. Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address Address a COMMUNITY NE SP®®~56~, iNC. ~q P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 R E C E I V 'fdt+ti, TT 7765 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 X994 Legal Notice Advertising • City of Tigard n 13 Tearsheet Notice CIT-x C-E SIB 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit o • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION S.,TaI ~ r OF norb;r: OREGON, . , COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )as' I,Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-4T ual a ; n mimes a newspaper of general circulo(on as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at igard in the _ aforesaid county and state; that the City Council Mtg January 25th a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and i consecutive in the following issues: January 20,1994 Subscribed and sworn to re me this 20t day of January OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A. BURGESS NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON Notsry Pu for Oregon COMMISSION NO. 024552 L~OMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,1997 My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT • AWL CITY OF TIG-ARD, OREG01-11 - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) l~ begin first duly sworn, on oath, .,1cn-CA an say: 4 mev,rv.... That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number (s) which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated o`er ! copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached Ad by reference r~iade a part hereof, on the day of a 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. West One Bank, 12260 SW Main Street, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 4. Albertson's Store, Comer of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and SW Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me th' day of 19. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: ,J. -C t.A.. IoginVo\a 06d . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 94- 01 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 93-0003 - JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for annexation signed by the Japanese International Baptist Church who are the owners of the subject parcels; and WHEREAS, The City Council held a public hearing on January 25, 1994 to consider the annexation request and to consider zoning designations for the properties; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 1994 the City Council approved a resolution forwarding the annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation as set forth in Section i below is consistent with the City of Tigard°s Comprehensive Plan Map. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The recommendation-of the planning staff as set forth below is consistent with policies 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Tax_Map/Lot Number Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 1Si 36CB / 701 Wash. Co. R-5 Tigard R-7 IS1 36CB / 790 Wash. Co. R-9 Tigard R-7 SECTION 2: The properties meet the definition for an established area as defined in Chapter 18.138 of the Community Development Code and shall be designated as such on the development standards area map. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. AWA ORDINANCE No. 94- 01 Page 1 PASSED: By _ vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 8)50 day of 1994. 41 Ga$herine Wheatley, Ci y Recorder APPROVED : This day of , 1994. " ald R. E ands, Mayor ci Approved as to form: 2 City tt rney Date MWAL ORDINANCE No. 94-- i Page 2 1.7 . A. TIGARD WATER Facts and Figures • Tigard Water District, established January 5, 1938, as special utility district following privately owned Tigard Water Company. - Covers 12 square miles, including 75% of City of Tigard, King City, Durham and 1,960 service connections in the unincorporated area of Bull Mountain and the Walnut wedge. - Metzger area on SW 72nd Avenue was added in 1968 to provide better fire flow to businesses as well as domestic service. It has 112 service connections, collecting only for water service. Taxes are paid to Tualatin Valley Water District; City of Durham was added in 1985; Tualatin Valley Water District that is within the City of Tigard has 3,000 service connections. - Tigard Water District has an excellent fire rating. - System has few deadends, and is self-circulating. • Equipment and Employees - 19 full time employees: 11 - field crew, 2 - drafting and administrative support, 2 - administration, 4 - customer service and billing. - Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition system (SCADA) run by computer and phone lines connects and monitors water reservoirs and pump stations throughout the system. • Structures and System Make-Up - Elevations and pressure zones Gravity supplies most of the system: One pound per square inch (psi) for every 2.31 feet drop in elevation. - Pressure zones: - Gravity zones: * Top of Bull Mountain down to 595 feet * Bull Mountain 595 feet to 290 feet * Top of Little Bull Mountain down to 290 feet * Little Bull Mtn. 290 to lowest point 0 12 Reservoirs - 12 reservoirs in 7 locations (5 in City of Tigard; 2 in unincorporated area versus none in King City or Durham; 21 million gallons total capacity) - 3 above ground steel tanks - 6 concrete, steel reinforced, panel constructed tanks, parfially buried - 3 concrete, steel reinforced, pre-stressed tanks, partially buried • 4 Wells - Well #1, located at SW Canterbury Lane - Well #2, located off SW Gaarde Street near the corner of SW 121st Wells #1 and #2 are turned on every summer to contribute approximately 900, 000 gallons of water per day. - Well #3, located on SW 135th at the bottom of Hillshire subdivision Well #3 is not normally used during the summer months, although it was used during the time of imposed water restrictions during the Summer of 1992. - Well #4, located on SW Beef Bend Road north of King City, in unincorporated area. Water is high in iron, and is not liked by recipients. Well #4 would be used only in an extreme emergency. page 1, aH20101CC.doc, 01/25/94 • 6 Pumn Stations - Bonita Street Pump Station HEN - #2 Pump Station transfer station, located at the Well #2 site, off SW Gaarde St. - 10 Million Pump transfer station, located at the 10 MG tank site on SW Bull Mountain Road - SW 132nd Street Pump Transfer Station, located on SW 132nd south of SW Walnut St. - Canterbury Pumps (pressure sustaining or booster pump station), located at the Canterbury Lane site. - High Tor Pump Station (pressure sustaining or booster pump station), located on the top of Bull Mountain. • Additional Buildings and Land - Reservoir sites purchased for future tanks: * SW 150th and Woodhue * SW. Menlor Dr. off SW Scholls Ferry Rd. - Additional pump station site: SW Beef Bend Rd. near SW 137th • Pipe - 1970's and 1980's, replaced old, thin-walled, steel, tar coated pipe with 1/2" thick ductile iron cement lined - 193 miles (1,019,980 feet) of ductile iron pipe, ranging in size from 2" to 36" diameter • Fire Hydrants - 1,415 fire hydrants • Water Connections To Other Cities - Lake Oswego at SW Bonita Road - City of Portland at two locations: Bradley Corners and SW 72nd -City of Beaverton at two locations:Along SW Scholls Ferry Rd. and 135th and SW Springwood Dr. - Lake Grove Water District at SW Carmen Dr - Tualatin Valley Water District (non-metered connection on Cascade Ave.) • Meters - Approximately 11,800 service connections • Water Charges To Customers - Minimum charge: $14.30 for 800 cubic feet every 2 months - $1.32 per hundred cubic feet above the 800 cubic feet minimum - $3.00 charge every 2 months for booster pump service to higher elevations • Water Supply - Lake Oswego: Clackamas River Water - City of Portland: Bull Run Water - Average of 4.1 million gallons per day (MGD) of water used now: 3.04 MGD in winter and 6.32 MGD in summer usage Am% page 2, a:MO101Mdoc, 01/25/94 17 i J 1 H G F E D C- - ¢ ''~y tY City of Tigard & Vicinity • _ y T Ile a a •a°b as 4 2 arm s ® o ` SC110LL5 ra,t.~ c, ` Y C FL egge 'c . co.rw cr•'( '°6 n. \'•y .ooo Oa r aw - S .0 19 f~PPy e : x s„ n`~nq ' \sna:awi f r ~`~r. r~u• i` e' 4 ' / \ ; rr,,,,,, 9 c ✓A ~ 1 i SCHOLLS O •r r•e.:r -v C, a✓ `ate// 7 ~•c ru¢ oo. ~ °j~ ~~i •Iy f,•Ya ~.i+rt ~ ~ a .S .~~ar a, ® • 4 • Si r r , ® Y~M ? P i i ~f i ~ 8 ~V o+ ara"SS ~ c . " r{ •.nn .Ll •p ~ j~ I'JCIA T~N~ 4 TUALA TIN •O I "`r'r' J I H G F E D C Y• _--r i LEGEND d F RESERVOIR SITES e it = ~P': "'"•s NO. 1 2 TANKS 2.0 m.g. capacity a 1 GENERATOR 1 DEEP WELL 1 1 BOOSTER PUMP STATION 2PUMPS -Y _ s1 NO. 2 1 TANK 0.28m.g. capacity = F ' - 1 GENERATOR e 7 = 1 DEEP WELL' F d• 1 PUMP STATION =c• ss Q 1 PUMP TO 10 m. 9. 1 PUMP TO HIGH TOR x [ q° ; NO. 3 2 TANKS 3.3 m.g. capacity P = F ® 1 DEEP WELL 3 r i~• NO. 4 1 TANK 1.0 m.g. capacity 5 1 DEEP WELL 1 ti~ j „ HIGH TOR 1 1 TANK 0.2 m.g. capacity s 1 GENERATOR M 1'`•'v'~`t•->. I 1 STAND-BY BOOSTER PUMP STATION x ...e..>,.. = 2 PUMPS "'°•h• a} = HIGH TOR 2 2 TANKS 2.1 m,4• capacity FIr „ al 6 1 BOOSTER PUMP STATION "4`.• 3 PUMPS BAYLOR 2 TANKS 2.125 m.g. capacity - •M-=••••= a' TERMINAL 1 TANK 10 m.g. capacity PUMP STATION 1 PUMP FOR HIGH TOR b BONITA PUMP STATION 3 PUMPS SUPPLY FROM LAKE OSWEGO HUNZIKER PUMP STATION 1 PUMP SUPPLY TO BAYLOR STREET TANKS 132nd. PUMP STATION 2 PUMPS SUPPLY TO HIGH TOR =';p' Y •"0 NN _ S.W. SCHOLLS FERRY •y H' 8 AND S.W. 135TH AVE CONNECTION TO BEAVERTON S.W. SCHOLLS FERRY VAULT CONNECTION TO BEAVERTON iP ^^-RRR t AND S.W. SPRINGWOOD DR. S.W. BRIDGEPORT RD. CONNECTION TO TUALATIN Fyn AND S.W. 72ND AVE. ~ti c 9 S.W. BOONES FERRY .f, s• ,.a _ j e AND LOWER BOONS FERRY CONNECTION TO TUALATIN +5,. S.W. BOONES FERRY RD. CONNECTION TO LAKE GROVE a s•5- AND S.W. CARMEN DR. s S.W. OLESON RD. CONNECTION TO PORTLAND 10 S A • r t V Ell I 89153004D 1~ 1I ~ I 1 I F - ~ jI~~GC 9~/ //d by7 ll~ ~y/ r/07~27 J 'w'(Iy~/~CU2~ !CL 7~~pJfVA383HMSS3NIIMNI j11lkUdo'Gwr.1/'f~~'Ll~ild _ @(~~pr~aA®L W -ftV, 4 • S• Y~ _ III ~ i - 1 l . ~ yf s ~y 'z,~ s'nCc'7~.a w}`~v~.a„ I 'fir /J.~"`/3 e^ x• _ 1 ` .lo-.~.~.Fr Nf _tY.- I • X17. , J J (~F.4. I 19. ~!r~r~aca~aar'25~S~sa~a~~c~~as .j NOT/CE. THE SIGNATURE Of THIS ASSIGNMENT _ - = I MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE Of THE CERrifICATE,INEI'£RYPARTICULARWITNOW ALTERATION OR ESLARGfNENT. OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. w c z RIM RJR ki. 'll, 6 I I ~I I COMMUNITY NE SPAPERS. INC. ~~~~a; P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684a36R, E ~ E 1'4 E ""entice TT 7 7 5 5 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ®City of Tigard 0 13 Tearsheet Notice -111 OF TjGARD PO Box 23397 613125 SW Hall Blvd. 0 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard,Oregon 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PU ^ -A-i I- -O rvesLiLN STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. I,Kathy Gnyri~r _ being first duly sworn, depose and sa~yy, that I am the Advertisin + _ $ Director, or his principal cleric, of theT1cfard-Tualatin imas a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published ai Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the Pnb_ H-arincf-/VrA 93-0003 TapanP-cP Tnt11 Baptist a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: _TannarV 1 3 994 Subscribed and sworn Core me this1 14-h r3ay 0f Janu r J~QA , OFFICIAL SEAL ROBIN A. BURGESS KRARY PUGI.IC - OREGON Notary P 49C for Oregon % COMMISSION.NO. 024552 My Commission Expires: MY C(gkAMISSiON EXPIRES MAY 16, !997 1 AFFIDAVIT _7 77, TT I 4 Ar T~e~£CSt~n~alfl~~c~11.1]€c,eCU~i,dar,+ ~ + S W k1a11~11oulearcl ~kgard QtggaasFurther infarmattan b►b ..I taut 4 fsotn the Commuri ty velogitisattrl)erector or~tCcty Re at°il#~ ~sam r e;tppation"ar by lhagg 639-4171 Yau are ted to srili€nit written P~ctimcrnv h'6dvance_Qf the`publcc:,heariug,;wnttecr and oral t~sbmony { wilt be considered az the heating. "Y'ne puaiic;ncarue~ ;wu: accordance with the°appliialsle Chapter+18:32 of the Tigard Manicipal Code and any rules of piciceduse adopted by.'the;~Coeujcrt antl~available at . ZONE CHAN: E AI IESCATiON ZC' 93-0n03. JAPANESE MaEB ATIf3NA BAPTIST~HURCH S W LOCAT1ON ;south'of S W Spnice 'Street at the easterly coiner of Hail Boulevard (WCTM 1Sl ~35CB tax tot 701 and 790) A request to annex two parcels consisting of approximately, 3 89 sores to.'the.City of ! Tigard and to:ahaisge theaone`ftatiiWashurgtion County R 5,(Residential, 5 units/acre) and R 9 (Residential. 9 units/acte:)`to the, r,ri, rif , fReci[ienr, S,':9 .,~a~.cc~-rLtcR,BLE:IEVIfiW CIPITERICom . prehensPlan 1?iiYicics'1,01 1,10:3 2,, iv l 10.1' 102 2, Y 2:3, f~ 10.3.1,`%0 3.2, Carmji~uni Development,C ' e Chapters and Sectpens. L8s32,.020,1 32 0408'18 3 130,181136,18.138, and`18138.010 (A) (B). Z!?E R 7 (Residntial, 7, einrts/acre) The R 7 zoning allows snngte-". fatuity Jetach'6iy tt ed, ri;sident:al units,; duple es, public sugipa € it ties, ti grriie h`trrte parks and su64i4 ions, resdential treacmPm_: d hpine' , ^iity ;wy care, rantie.occayiations, eem ho:r es, inanufactiire fa ply eases. and accessQrl► strunw-es among ether uses.'. ( ohru'MHUNSI'vv c r a"I w -ANT t ~A 9"4xml "Slyk` 93-0014! ND ITT u =MINOR LAND PAr'tTTI'ICi ;IMEP 13/ fI1rRTSON'S/Di]NC( a LOCATION: Southeast arid,'nartheast guasaries of 'the intersection afI S.W,SchollsFerry Tcoad and s VW',. inut Street" (WM'M 2S1413B, ! lots-100 and:200) A regft-a ffor th6'&ltowarg development approvals: 1) Compreheng-N-6 Plan and Zone Change approval;to redese$nate:ap prozemately';eegghe acres of a 12, acre;fiarcel: from Medium High Density Residential ti Comr anity C mancrceat dh lak tot 200 and tas redesignate afi approximately 33 acre; parcel from Neightaorhood pmmerciai to Ivleiiiurh High Dcttstty Messdentiid on tax` lot l0U Zane changes`accdm " de j panytag the strove„plan clisc%ges inoiu _a one'change from R-2.5 (EU) (Residential,`25 units/acre, PlannedDevjelQpnent} to C-C (Community CoinereiAY) and C-N teiglhbarhoo Commei+cral) [o R 25 (Resadeeitial ~Suttits/acts St> -vetoprraent` p'dol pMV to allow the can stntctiati~ of q 57,5$0 q4M c multiple , L III ' ittmei efml building stropping cent; S} t~ciritlitioiial Use a va[^to atlow,the construction of a X3,000 stYuartr €oot gasalr"statetriti,~Iinor istd lition approval ui divide the 12m parcel Int€i;two pai, "ls~of aplr~oauilatety bight acres`and faun acres each Al'P CA' A AFP'I OVAfSU1TEPUA Statewid®1't~n ` r ning'Goa1s l,' 2.9,°DU.11, and 12. C-6in tiepseVO Policies t l x, 1 1.2,'41 1,~~,1.r 5.`lale 5 1 3F, b~'l, to 41,,'f ,1.2, 7.Z 1, 4,4, ?S 2, 7.6 1 8 1.1; 81.3;12,1'9; l2 Q 1; ated b2 2 4, C iinunit Yelcpn! t Code, .Chapt~rxs 1$.22,'183218.5b,,18.~,~.18.G1,1'8.35~ 18,-1(10.18:102, i8~I05, , 1TI.108,18:1147y8116,186220, M130,and18:164. TT77SS Pnbhsh lafib4ry 13;1994 AOL Mill iThe fOllOwirt6 zr►eei1{ ptEbltshed fcytr inforntstiIl 71 agendas.tpay be olttabt!'O& Fit YlleCity t dar 1 1~. .,..~.R k jOkk B~litYlt YBd~" Z, vin :n.-g.;~~ 9 r"" sotgY iogi, =~i1 Cl 3 c1TY couNc . B jsmg9,IvIpETING JANUARY 25;199 " TIGARI) CITYiHALL lb*N HALL 1 13125 S. 1: HALL BOULEVARD, TGARD, OREGON • .study Meeting (1b%;p Hall Conference Room) (530 P.M.) Basic Review:bf Water System; . "Business.Mm;ing (Town Hall) (7:30 P.IvM.)' Proclamation:",'National COrriuurlity Developirlerit (March's hprai 3,1994) Public bearings: oatiouattO a of Public Heaf^eng from December;14,1993: Com- 09/ZON"93 0003/SDR prPlienmve Plan Amendment CPA 93 00 9ti- 7nIA/ - C 93-0002/MLP`93 0013 4lbertsop'Slw, combe A requestfor tW` folld' Oj deveioprnG„t uNl,..,:~ut~ t) ~'omnrehansive MAIM Tone Change approval to redesignate appr&ii6tely eight acres:®f 4~ , acre paicel from,Medium 1£igh,Densrty Itesadential to Conimunity:Commerctal onaaic Iot 200.and to redesignate„"anap- proximately 6 93 acre;parcel-froerr Neighborhood Commercial to Medium HtgW Density Resrdernttai on,tsx lot100 Z®te charges ac- conzanytngte above plan;ehangeA r~aciude aI zone'ehange;f.om R 2~.(PD) (Resaaenuzu, 4~ ur,w,u armed Devrlopmentto C. ' C (CommunityCommerctal) and C-N (NeiglWorhood Comm@i'ciai). to R-25 (Residential, 25 untt~/acre), 2) Stte Development Review - approval to a11" the constractton Of a 53,950 square foot'mtila :FAR- ~IJG WII1rI1GICla1 ie1111 Oltliaing;;~"s) Conai~onaa:~3se approval:to { af4ow. the construction of a 4;000!sgnare'foat gasoline station, 4) : - 2~ltttir LandPartttttiti.approYal fo divide tWe 1? acre parcel into two paeaels of approxtmgtely etght`acres . anti four acres'each LOCA TICS Sbutheastand:northeast uad?an'Lfi o t 14d secnon,of; Ir ' - Scholls Ferry=Road`arid S W: `Ndinut`Street. ; : . Zone Change A;ranexateon~;,.ZCA~ 93-0003=Japanese Interna tr6nal Zaaptisthinrcrs Locailataor. Sotth of s W Spntca StreeE at Are ques._ annex the.erastezly corner~pf S V11 H Boulevard: two parcels consisgng Of' approxtFeta.ety` 189 acres to tim Ctty Of ' igard and to change the zone trom Washington Cciunty 7t 0` esidentral, 5 uni slaere) and`13= (Resfdeneial, 9 units/acre) to the City of Tigard 12-7:'(Re'sidentiai, 7 futtts/acre): a Vacation 0f zi< pOrtron,®f'9.W. 79th*,e, jiue,.an unnamed 20-foot b-44i ~+ece riF,mrrr~ wrdj`t95t Of S.V. 79th `Avenue; .,cu . ~ o plat TwinrOkks Lang. The request was riirtrated-by the City of :Tigard C6unetl;bn Novernbcr,23,1993, og liehal 6fRal Keever of W&H Paclfi for Ccstco Who, sale: Local Contract Review Board Meeting 3 Execu ve Ses ibn} , I.oxigard,,City :.oanoil' may go,inte Executive Session under the provisions bf CRS 192.E (l (1) (d),.( );'4c (h);to dt~ cuss labor.relations,"real property transactions; current and pending 1?ti93tiOn issues. Tr7765 Publish lanusry 2f ,1994. r , 17 J5~ ~ J CA> TheWetlandsConservancy S.2 SS ~ d1r~ AIN& . January 15, 1994 Mr. Patrick Reilly, City Administrator Off L City of Tigard ~ JAN 2 1994 13125 S. W. Nall Blvd. 9 Tigard, Oregon 97223~~ - Re: John B. Knez Property, Tigard Dear Mr. Reilly, During the past two years or so The Wetlands Conservancy (TWC) has worked with the City of Tigard, Paul Agrimis of David Evans Associates and various volunteer groups to eradicate teasel, thistle and other invaders from the tufted hair2rass prairie remnant on the Knez property. This property, though small, is part of an unusual and import.--^.t eco-system that was once very common to the entire Willamette Valley. The Wetland Conservancy is interested in accepting ownership of the Knez property from the City of Tigard if the city would be willing to deed the property to AOL us. We have prev=iously exchanged property with the city and we have the volunteer capacity and scientific expertise to manage the Knez property far the public benefit in perpetuity. We have liability insurance that covers all of our holdings and we have property tag exemptions on all of our laird as well. I am enclosing some material about TWC for your information along with a map and legal description of the property. If this donation of ownership is of interest to the city, please let us know. I would be happy to meet to discuss this issue with you or the city attorney or anyone else whom you might like to involve. Sincerely yours, J ck Broome operties Director cc: Duane Roberts 4P Post Office Box 1195 Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Phone: (503) 691-1394 n t ~~5~'~i wed METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION r~ STRATEGIC APPROACH DOCUMENT DR-An- January 24, 1994 A. MACC MASTER STRATEGY: Support the development and operation of a state of the art cable communications system. STRATEGIC OEiECTiv~s 1. "Make sure people have good pictures," MACC is effective advocate/watchdog, and cable operator provides excellent customer service. a. Cable Act provisions are implemented. b. TCI Franchise Agreement in place and a new contract established between MACC and Washington County. C. RegLdatory authority over Cable System retained regardless of partnership structure. d. A Franchise Agreement is prepared for 1999 and beyond. e. The technical quality of the PCN meets the needs of its customers, i.e. minimal outages, long-term viability and efficient access. CRUERIA FOR SUCCf Customer service standards are wwwded, MACC is prepares for danp of gip. . 2. Cable communications systems franchised by MACC offer diverse, high- quality, and technologically: advanced services. Mme" "hON a. MACC will continue to challenge the Cable Operator (through. the refranchising 'process) to.. expand the variety and quality of services available to customers. MACC Strategic Approach Document January 24, 1994 - LrerUA, J. Page 2 ° b. PCN' will offer viable 'new services through interconnection 'with other networks and cab's Sy sterns. CF_n L _ FOR SUCH: Cable ay :l and indwistry stan&rds are wtonibored- to emm customers r cdve a be'*value cable systBln- MAt.CC MASTER STRATEGY: - MACC will. be proactive and advocate the highest quality 'telecommunications service at the least public cost. _STRATEGIC OBTECTfM 1. In the public interest, MACC will provide leadership and policy direction regarding telecommunications or public communications issues. a,. MACC determines and advances its public interest role in emerging technologies, cable. b, ®m„at 1~QiSlative priorities for Oregon Ugislature, Congress axe e ons are - wLox-dto.,.A and - dvel o ped`.and ~ advanced. - = Court.decisi addressed. a M ACC a wo=l sth ;ugh - its'. 'chnoYogy Committee to evaluate: options and propose best positions for its customers. 65. :"t t 4si ]Miff .i6r, ~Comi'ds?.on discussion/consid T. J d. -°MACCtii n cl u fo nuns affect mernbea' e t malr 3 -tom = eration `oaf ocammiacatxons chnologgr that r k h t 'urisctctlons L J M a:3 3 SwM a s, x,x 1 +s:i;ii),~. ;ry a t + . 1 VaYus MA'a''P and ~~p t q °s( 1Py~e ~CC .9c > H: l t r Sa 14'111 017,77-7. i aoy1l ? *L 3rj t 1 . irft'.,~a 5. <.}t~y~J, 5t: .5 -fr '+I~^ hr)f °4 t1Si fitr' mot'. r I 9 4 e• } 5 - ii ! > O k ~rx ,~'},'r~"7 t~~"""FX4~ >~:5 i , ~4 5~~x ~ n'" ~ • d .fC t s., . I.., ^r ?tl~~* ~ a'a~'v+ tTT~.~~~ L`df ' r "~''z, i~t~~ . tTierS7~f1V1'A ~~C'``~`Ydetet~llnes`and ~a.w vaIL02S ~~,-r,k~s~t..~~~. 7 .L. in them .t t 7 Y 5 r k,f t t 4r .'l. jta_ S ~ \y i qi'6{/` t S '1 ,Positions ,on - 1 Y. 1 j' ! h1(J it ti Y' -S ~ Rt' 3 rt~ o Er t 1 Y t t*' ~".S ~~iA ,pty' ~5 1 y>'s t ~ ~ i.; s1 rdt t *~frir~ G( C ~ ! F ; 14 1. t t l t IL4 ) ;t a Pii. s .r.?yi~ 32r ~.~°L Ya{F!~ fig. ' a F{ ^1S - ti .V fs >t '~t, tr Y .5 ' 5f Nyl J 4 r ` G + Y` .k c V. f~'r' Y7 r rA J C'hr) Z ~Tw~F 4~'~y.N'wV:.i ~a1"]5• t i Mf 1 I ISS °Y r..t~aY ~e ~'i~S F + i - t VYcondtxct'~nalysisjon0eoop?'ative .efforis_~nnth: g1~g r x~ '~t. franchise authorities U, ut a aw s ti +,ra- yhy i llr t t s- i ,t s t~%w Y 1 7. F f ~ : ~ ! 1, ~ ~ ~ YTM1= r} f( ~{`tlx;~ NMI MACC Strategic ppproac dh Document January 24, 1994 - DRAFT -45- 1). . MACC proposes -solutions to multi-jurisdiction. telecommunications problems. CRUHRIA FOR SUCH: MACC' actively pursues and proposes consolidation Where appr+opriam . 3. A proactive method for assessing MACCs financial needs is established, including value-driven evaluation processes, with MACC returning funds to the jurisdictions when appropriate. NM ONES a. MACC will develop improved data systems able to evaluate services and implement options. b. Program budgeting based on MACC Strategic flan is developed and implemented. CUITMIA FOR SU: MACC data systems am in place to evaluate service options, and implement program budgeft.* C. MACC MASTER STRATEGY: Develop and implement a comprehensive public education strategy for MACC. STRATEGIC OBTEOWES 1. Media and public view MACC as the region's best source for telecommunications public interest advocacy and information. a. MACC Communications Plan is developed and implemented. b. MAC. C is, recognized by, the• local media as a leading resource for telecommunications information and leadership. C. Public: and nonprofit', agencies are educated about the potential benefits- of the PCN, and they recognize that it is a first-choice option -for ,certain telecommunications needs. CPA-TE i. FOR SJ MACC is betta know, used more extensively as an information somx* by public and media. MACXM24SAP 17-7 METROPOLITAN AREA. COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION TASK PLANNING/Strategic Planning DRAFT January 24, 1994 MACC MASTER STRATEGY A: SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF A STATE OF THE ART CABLE COMMUNICATIOFJS SYSTEM. OBIECTIVE 1 "MAKE SURE PEOPLE HAVE GOOD PzcmmS," MACC IS EFFECTIVE ADVOCA.TFMATmDOG, AND CABLE OPERATOR PROVIDES EXCEU ENT CUSTOMER SERVICE. Cable Act provisions are implemented. ► Regulation of customer service standards and rates. On-going TCl F_ramchise Agreement is in place.and a new contract is established with Washington County/Tigard/Beaverton. ► TCl negotiations finalized. Spring 94 ► Consideration of agreement between MACC, Washington County, Tigard, & Beaverton. - , Summer 94 BOWHAN ► Determination of reporting responsibility. Fall 94 Regulatory authority over cable's°ystem retained'regardless of partnership structure. ► Evaluate: capabilities of potential mew,ownership -+19'96 1996 ' ► Grant/Deny change of ownership 'v'A Francl~ase Agreemenf'U prepake&fo 1999' nd=bey®nYYel.; ' :N •eM' ~ a.~C ~ ~ j -t s ~i'~g~. ~:'`''i>~ S''.a`P''i ~aS 1'F k~~''x'U` 1:i.: ~ ii Y.C~~. 1. Begin negotiations, 1996 evaluate service/bandwidth of PChT 1996 1996 -,conduct needs assessineaitlupdafie service plan . ; t advocate for state o£ the art cable services 1996 - . agreementm pl ♦I, 2 ;Fracei ter 99 J ► New franctuse E MACC TASK PLAID KING/STRATEGIC PLANNING 77. January 24, 1994 - DRAF17 _T'--- 2 Adlikk The Technical Quality of the PCN meets the needs of its customers. ► MACC/Cable operator to conduct survey of available broadband telecommunications equipment compatible with the PCN. On-going ► Monitor PCN outages. Monthly ► Measure PCN technical quality through customer survey, frequency management plan. Winter 95 OBIEC ME 2 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FRANCHISED BY MACC OFFER DIVERSE, HIGH-QUALITY, AND TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED SERVICES. MACC will continue to challenge the cable operator fflf rouch the refranchising process) to expand the variety and quality of services available to customers..' ► Determine "state of the ar r7best value (based on on-going analysis of telecommunications options). --),1995 ► Advocate for state of the art cable services. 1995 The PCN will offer viable new services through inter- connection with other networks. ► The FCN is interconnected with other networks aad cable systems, and there are viable services available through r9 , these interconnections. °..----e MA.CC MASTER STRATEGY, B: 4ACC WILL BE, PROAcriw AND ADvocATE THE HIGHEST QUALITY TELECON04MCATIONS SERVICE AT THE LEAST PUBLIC COST. OBTECTTVE 1 IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST', MACC • wiLL PROVIDE LEADERSHIP AND POLICY DIRECTION REGARDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS OR PUBLIC,ZCOMMUNICATIONS ISSUES. n 11 Elm MACC TASK PLANNING/STRATEGIC PLANNING January 24, 1994 - DRAFT' Page 3 MACC determines and advances its public interest role in emerging tech clogi¢es, cable. ► Reevaluate MACC legislative priorities. Spring 94 ► Determine public interest role in emerging technologies. Spring 94-a ► Develop/implement action plan. Summer94-+ Annual legislative priorities for Oregon Legislature, Congress are developed and advanced. Court decisions are monitored and addressed. ► Coordinate with/inform Congressional representatives. On-going ► Coordinate with NATOA/OATOA and others. On-going Preserve cable television local authority through workshops I N ATOA/LOC coordination On-going - MACC works through its Technology Committee to evaluate options and propose the best position for MACC customers. o regular and as-needed meetings held. On-going ► Decide position on Columbia Cable Competitive Access Provider application and recommend to Board. 2/94 MACC conducts forams for Commission discussion/consider- ation of communication technology that may affect member ► Hold forums as needed. On-going OaE n yE 2 IN THE INTEREST OF TfS MIST "TIMERS; MACC DETERMINES AND `ADVANCES POSITIONS 'OM, CONSOLIDATION ISSUES. - t . MACC TASK PLANNING/STRATEGIC PLANNING January 24, 1994 - DRAFT 't rage MACC conducts analysis an cooperative efforts with neighboring franchise authorities. Deterniine viability of regulation of new metro area jurisdictions and systems. FY 94/95 MACC proposes solutions to multi-jurisdiction telecommunicafions problems. Explore/propose coordination of other area I-NETS. FY 94/95 OBIEC'MIE 3 A PRO-ACTIVE METHOD FOR ASSESSING MACCS FINANCIAL NEEDS IS ESTABLISHED, INCLUDING VALUE-DRIVEN EVALUATION PROCESSES, WITH MACC RETURNING FUNDS TO JURISDICTIONS WHEN APPROPRIATE. MACC will develop improved data systems able to evaluate services' and implement options. P implement improved data systems. FY 94/95 Program budgeting based on the MACC Strategic Plan is developed and implemented. Process developed. (MACC staff/Strategic Planning Committee/Board). Spring 94 Evaluation of current/future programs through strategic Annually planning process. Approved by Board. Annually MACC. MASTER STRATEGY, Q DEVELOP AND. MIPLEMENT A .COMPREHENSIVE PUBUIC EDUCATION STRATEGY FOR I1,~ACC.: O*trryE 1 : _ . r.._._ A. MEDIA AND PUBLIC VIEW MACC AS, THE REGIONS BEST SOURCE FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY AND INFORMATION. MACC TASK PLANNING/STRATEGIC PLANNING January 24, 1994 - DRAFT' Page - -v- - MACC Communications Plan developed and implemented. ► Plan is incorporated into program budget. Spring 94 ► MILACC and PCN Newsletters generated/distributed, ► On-going televised telecommunications forums produced. Summer94-a MACC is recognized by local media as a leading resource for telecommunications information and leadership. ► Contacts established with local media. On-going ► Public-interest news stories generated. On-going ► Community outreach plan implemented. Summer%-~ Public and non-profit agencies are educated about the potential benefits of the PCN and they recognize that it - is a first-choice option for certain telecommunications needs. ► Agency outreach plan implemented. Summer%-~ TP012494SAP Ri PROCLAMATION National Community Development Week March 28 - Anrl! 4 ! oo- " WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM has r operated since 1974 to provide local governments with the resources required to nieet it o needs of persons of low and moderate income; and nth!}- WHEREAS, Community Development Block Grant funds are used by a vast number of cities, counties and neighborhood-based nonprofit organizations throughout the Nation to address pressing neighborhood and human service needs; and WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Is one of the few remaining federal programs to meet such low and moderate Income Muni needs as the dwindling supply of affordable housing, the massive rise in ' . homelessness, and the resurfacing of hunger and malnutrition; and WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM has provided the City of Tigard with important end flaxible assistance to help meet the needs of our low and moderate Income residents in funding neighborhood revitalization, housing rehabilitation, public improvements, and social services; and, Y: WHEREAS, the Congress and the Nation has often overlooked the critical value ~z of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM and the significant number of organizations and. the projects that rely on Its funds for support; and WHEREAS, the week of March 28 through April 3, 1994 has been reserved for T4 ~+l recognition and appreciation of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. :c NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1, Mayor Gerald R. Edwards, of the rplill City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim March 28 through April 3, 1994 as NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK in Tigard, Oregon and call upon all citizens of our city to participate in ceremonies and activities celebrating the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. :iJji un~i Dated this day of 1994. ` l fs? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed. Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor " City of Tigard SFC w t 711 , h Attest: City Recorder 4 AGENDA ITEM # For Agenda of - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Dedication of reserve strips as right of way PREPARED BY: John HadlaK DEPT HEAD OK AAW7 CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Dedication of, existing reserve strips as public right of way to allow extension of streets. r~ECOaMM j'll'•1r1C SW~.v ENDAT I ON Approval of the attached resolution authorizing the dedication. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Community Development Code requires the dedication of reserve strips at the temporary dead ends of street at the boundaries of new subdivisions. AftWhen the streets are extended, it is necessary to dedicate the reserve strips as public right of way. Currently, Jeffery Estates is being processed that involve the extension of streets and require the dedication of the reserve strips in adjoining subdivisions. Previous approvals by the Planning Commission or Hearings Officer have authorized the street extensions. The attached resolution will authorize the City Administrator to dedicate the reserve strips as public right of way so that the street extensions can be completed. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL NOTES ]ohnrMhart.ss COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # 5 (From meeting of I7237W MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrators FROM: Ec? Murphy, Director of Community Developmen DATE:_ January 19, 1994 SUB3'ECT: Albertson's At the public hearing on December 14, 1993, several issues were raised about the noticing practices, the type of decision and level of review that was before the council, and who had standing to speak on the issue. This memo will address some of the procedural issues. NOTIFICATION 1. Did the neighbors receive proper notification of the Planning Commission and City Council Hearings? The notification was technically proper. The property owners of record within 250' of the subjact property were all mailed a notice of both hearings, as per TDC Chapter 18.32.130. A notice was mailed on, September 28th; October 8th and November 24th. The City also posted two signs on the property regarding the application (although the signs do not specify the date of the hearing). In addition, the City advertised the public hearings in the Tigard Times. Separate from the city notification, the applicant notified surrounding property owners on July 20th, as well as posting two signs on the property, inviting people to the neighborhood meeting. However, many of the newer residents were not notified of the public hearings directly. The information used to create the city notification list was from August 1993. Therefore, many of the notices were sent to the builders, not the new homeowners. The city uses information from Washington County to create the list of affected property owners, and that information is only updated 2 - 4 times a year. 'The Code requires a "good faith effort" (Section 18.32.150), and states that failure of a property owner to receive notice does not invalidate the action as long as such an effort is made. In addition, the sign posted by the applicant was apparently 9P removed for part of the time, and the signs posted by the city may not have been up the entire time. ' i Prior to the upcoming city Council meeting of January 25th, staff sent another notice to all property owners of record within 250, of the property, this time using a more up-to-date mailing list. 2. Should the City have notified Murrayhill Thriftway Owners? _ No. The City is required to notify everyone within 2501. Murrayhill Thriftway is not within that distance. The City is under no legal or moral obligation to guess who would be interested or affected.. The City Code does provide for notification to interested parties outside of the required notification distance ifI they make a written request to be notified (TDC 18.32.130 A.l.e). In this case, no such request was made by Thriftway. NEARING PROCEDURE 1. Who can testify at the public hearing on January 25th? It is up to the Council, but the Council continued the hearing of December 14th, and President Schwartz stated at that meeting that he would let all sides rebut testimony, with the applicant and Thriftway representatives offering to put their rebuttal in writing in advance. The City Council did not specifically close the next hearing to oral, testimony, but did ask people who wanted to rebut to submit their written comments by January 14th. The Council may open the hearing based on TDC 18.22.030.A.3 and 18.32.320.B.1), which essentially states that the Council can confine the review of the Planning Commission decision to the record unless the Council determines that the admission of additional evidence is appropriate. In this case, staff would advise that it is appropriate to open the public heating to any oral or written testimony addressing rebuttal. 2. Should the Council hear or admit testimony from people who did not testify at the Planning Commission level? The way it was left at the hearing on December 14th, the council agreed to hear. the testimony, but not necessarily accept it into the record. The arguments for and against accepting the testimony are to be brought forward, in writing, by the applicant and the opponents prior to the Council meeting on January 25th. The staff recommendation would be-to hear and admit testimony from people, whether or not they testified at the Planning Commission level. Staff feels that particularly since this item is not an appeal, but a Comprehensive Plan change, that would have had to come before the City Council anyway, that it would be appropriate to hear and admit testimony. The City Attorney is reviewing the issue as of this writing. AOL 3. Can the Mayor vote on the issue? The mayor was not at the hearing, but if he reads the minutes or views the tape, he can choose to participate in the discussion and vote on the application. 4. Should the councilors describe site visits prior to the at&" of the hearing? Yes. Even if they have just driven by the property since the last hearing, they should describe what they saw so that the information is available to parties who may want to rebut. r 5. Should the Council refer the whole matter back to the Planning commission? Clearly, the choice is the Council's. Arguing in favor of referring it back is that much new testimony is being presented to the Council that was nut presented to the Planning Commission. It would give the Planning commission more information upon which to base their recommendation to the Council. Arguing against referring it back is that the application has to come before the city council anyway; the Planning Commission reviewed the case and has already made a recommendation regarding the major issues (site appropriateness, size and arrangement of the proposed uses, for AWL instance); and it may be a non-productive use of everyone's time (staff, Planning Commission, developer and his representatives and citizens) to go before the Planning Commission again. Staff would recommend against referring it back in this case. Further, if the Council does decide to refer it back, staff would recommend that the Council give some guidance to the Planning Commission about the Council's concerns or interests. MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES 1. Is there really a "swap" between the neighborhood commercial to the north and this community commercial zone? No. The neighborhood commercial would not allow a grocery store or development of this size. The Community Commercial zone is quite. different from the neighborhood commercial in size and allowable uses. It is correct to state that the Neighborhood Commercial zone will be eliminated if and when the Council adopts the ordinance creating the Community Commercial zone. It is not correct to say that "Albertson's could develop this same project in the Neighborhood Commercial zone". 2. Does the applicant have a "right" to the commercial zone? No. Since the applicant is applying for a Comprehensive Plan and Zone change, and has not yet received such, the applicant has no inherent "right" to develop this property as commercial. The land r owner has a right to d-ve'-- the grerwerty under the -rernil at7 oils a~vGi~.~~► ~a..,....., j _ _ that exist at the time of the application. The City Cou~ncil m_ay approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Comprehensive Plan change along with the attendant zone change, site plan and conditional use permit applications. Further, the applicant does not have a "right" to the maximum ,.c±e,no or max-;nun allowable square footage within the CC zone, should the Council change the zone. The Council may approve less than the maximum allowed. One of the key points of the CC zone was for the Council to be able to be specific as to the size and design of a community commercial center in order to tailor it to the neighborhood or site. 3. Wow will the details,of the design be handled? The Community commercial zone outlines those design features that are mandatory, and those which are considered guidelines (but which can be imposed as mandatory through conditions of approval). The Council may choose which, if any, of the guidelines should be imposed as conditions of approval. In this type of zone, it is important to keep in mind that the site review plan is part of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and zone change. Major modifications to what the Council approves would be reviewed by the Planning Commission in the same manners as a zone change. Other modifications would be processed as Director's Decisions. Very minor changes or design details would be reviewed by staff only. 4. What level of detail is sufficient to make a decision? The staff and Planning commission determined that sufficient detail was provided by the applicant to review and recommend approval of the application. Staff does not interpret the Community Commercial section of the Development Code to mean that the actual tenant has to be known, for instance. Yet clearly the location, size, general design and use of a building needs to be known. In other words, it is important to know that a.restaurant is being proposed, but not necessarily that it be a "Shari's" restaurant. Not knowing the exact tenant at the time of the public review means, of course, that the exact signage details would not be known at that time. Again, the Council may wish to know the general signage scheme, but not necessarily the actual words or the lettering type or color of the signs. 5. Threshold questions This zone is different than most, in that the Comprehensive Plan change and details of the actual. site plan are to be reviewed together. It is easy to get lost in the details of pedestrian AMMIL access and landscaping before some more basic questions, are settled. Perhaps the Council can approach the subject along these lines: MP a) Is this generally a good location for Community Commercial development? It meets the locational criteria, but is it a suitable location that meets the intent of, the community commercial zone? b) If it is a good location, are the proposed uses acceptable, in type and scale? Is a' grocery store an acceptable use for the property, and iS 40,000 square feet alt acceptable mils for w grocery store? C) once those questions are answered, the Council could review the actual site plan ...the arrangement of the buildings on the site the pedestrian and vehicular access to and within the site, the relationship of the development to the existing or probable future surrounding development, etc. d) Then the Council can address more specific design issues, including signage, type of -building materials, landscaping details and the like. e) And finally, the Council could address more operational concerns. Should it be a 24 hour grocery store (which requires a conditional use permit)? Should there be specific restrictions dealing with hours of operation for deliveries or parking lot sweeping? In other words, going from the very broad to the very narrow, in terms of review. may mare it easier to review and reach a decision. And of course, if the Council does not feel that it has enough. information to make a decision based on the criteria contained in the Comprehensive Plan and Development Code, then please request such information from the applicant or staff. I hope this memo is of some value to you and the City Councilors. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. AGENDA ITEM For Agenda of gr 1 RA_blic hear itn9 wtis CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON o~ d on I~III a COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY h I faS~a.rR9 n"q ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE 93-0009/Zone Ch!jncre 93 0003/Site Dev. 0 PREPARED BY:.Dick B. DEPT NEAD.OK CITY ADMIN OK _ . s- --'°^-'^a=aaaaaaaa~aaeaeseaaa _ _ aas ISS2E BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council approve Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to redesignate 8 acres to Community Commercial and 6.93 acres to Medium-High Density Residential concurrently with site development review, conditional use and minor-land partition approval to allow development of a convenience shopping center. STAFF RECOTOTENDATION Approve the attached ordinance adopting the findings, conclusions and Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Site Development Review, Conditional Use and Minor Land Partition as recommended by the Planning Commission. INFORMATION SUMMARY To comply with the requirements of the newly adopted Community Commercial ppplan and zone designation, Albertson's Inc. has requested the above listed rovals. The request involves changing 8 acres to Community Commercial CC) from Medium-High Residential (R-25PD & R-12) at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Walnut and Scholls Ferry Road. The request also includes redesignating 6.93 acres of Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to Medium- Itigh Density Residential (R-25) at the northeast corner of the same intersection. The plan and zone requirements for the Community Commercial zone also require a concurrent submittal and review of the Site Development Plan. in addition, the applicant has submitted Conditional Use requests to allow 24 hour operation of the proposed grocery store and to allow a gas station at the northeast corner of the shopping center site as well as a minor partition to separate the 8 acre shopping center parcel from the original 32 acre parcel. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at a public hearing on November 15, 1993. There was no opposition at the hearing. The proposed plans incorporate much of the suggestions provided through the neighborhood meeting process. Comments were presented about the need to provide for additional pedestrian ways. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposal as indicated in the revised staff report as attached. Included in both the staff and -Commission recommendation are numerous conditions including: a requirement for a driveway access between the shopping center site and SW Northview Drive, an additional sidewalk/stairway to the grocery store at the intersection of SW Stardust and SW Northview, a revised site plan which requires providing an enhanced sidewalk system from Scholls Ferry and Walnut with interconnections between all buildings, an access plan for vehicles and pedestrians for the remainder of the 12 acre parcel, and denial the conditional use request for the service station. AMksne applicant°s statement and traffic study, draft minutes of the Planning commission hearing, the staff report and a proposed ordinance approving they - request are attached.* The proposed ordinance includes provisions (Section 3) ti7at make the comprehensive plan and zone change,, effective at the time of issuance of building or development permits. The thought was that if the development does no A[!cti- i the c7 AS, and 9AT1p ^Z an"VeZ sh.c"_A... .r.. ba o ffGc i vs ' aca-aaUscaet tal' the and not ►..v d....a.ev...i.~v wac~.ua8ts Council adopted Community Commercial plan and ordinance provisions that call for concurrent review of the site plan. The other side of the issue is that if the development location is a good site for this type of zone, maybe the comp plan and zone change should be effective in thirty days so that all concerned,, including neighbors know that the property will ultimately be developed for Community Commercial purposes. There is also the alternative of making the approval of the plan and zone change null and void within a specific period of time if no development occurs. Alternative for Section 3 of the proposed ordinance are attached to the proposed ordinance. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached ordinance approving the request according to the recommendations and findings listed in revised staff report. 2. Modify the approval and direct staff to prepare a revised ordinance and findings as necessary. 3. Deny the request according to appropriate findings. - - FISCAL NOTES None *These attachments were submitted in the December 14, 1993, Council packet. If additional copies are needed, please contact Cathy Wheatley (639-4171, Ext. 309), City Recorder, for information. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 94-71 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONE MAP AMENDMENTS, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, CONDITIONAL, USE AND MINOR PARTITION APPROVALS FOR A SHOPPING CENTER REQUESTED BY ALBERTSON'S (CPA 93-0009/ZC 93-0003/SDR 93-0014/CUP 93-0002/MLP 93-0013) wtikkBAS, the applicants have requested Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map approvals to change approximately 8 'acres of a 12 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential (R-25PD & R-12) to Community Commercial (C-C) 'on tax lot 200, and to change a 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) to Medium-High Density Residential (R-25) on tax lot 100 and concurrent approval of Site Development Review for a 57,550 square foot shopping center, conditional use approval for the 24-hour operation of a proposed grocery store, conditional use-approval of a gas station and minor partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into parcels of approximately 4 and 8 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request on November 15, 1993 and unanimously concurred with the Planning Division recommendation as revised at the hearing and as indicated in the revised staff report; and WI IE:'.EAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the request on December 14, 1993, to review the applicant's statement and traffic NORM study, the staff report, staff and Commission recommendations, and to receive public testimony; THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria based upon the facts, findings, and conclusions noted in the attached staff report, (Exhibit A), the minutes of the Planning Commission's November 15, 1993 meeting (Exhibit B), and the applicant's narrative and traffic study (Exhibits C & D). SECTION 2: The City Council concurs with the Planning commission and staff recommendations and approves the following: 1.) amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps as indicated on Exhibit A of the staff report; 2.) site development review of the plans for the 57,550 square foot shopping center; 3) conditional use approval of the 24 hour operation the grocery store; 4) minor partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately 8 and 4 acres each; all with conditions listed in the staff report; and 5) denial of the conditional use request for a 4,000 square foot gasoline station. ORDINANCE No. 94- Page 1 17 SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective at the time a building permit or other development permit (e. g. , grading nar-! t; is issuGdA after pa"age of this ordinance by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1994. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of , 1994. Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 94- Page 2 - ALTITRNATIVES FOR SECTS®N 3 VAx X `AS is') ~ ~ (s2auhrly modified for clarity). This ordinance shall be effective at the time a building permit or other development permit (e.g., grading permit) is issued after passage of this ordnance by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. In the evert that a building or other development permit is not issued, the ordinance shall not become effective, and the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation will remain as it is currently. Section 3: (modified to be a reversal). This ordinance shall be effective in 30 days after passage of this ordinance by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. In the event that a building permit or other development permit (e.g. grading permit) is not issued within 18 - months from the effective date of this ordinance )or 30 months if the Community Development Director approves a 12 month extension as allowed under Section . ► 12. 1in nAn of the Community De .elope' :-.ent. CCo e), then the approval of this ordinance shall be null and void, and the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations shall be automatically changed back to the designations existing on these properties prior to the passage of this ordinance. Section 3: (modified to allow Comprehensive Plan/Zoning to continue). This ordinance shall be effective in 30 days after passage of this ordinance by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. In the event that a building permit or other development permit (e.g. grading permit) is not issued within 18 months from the effective date of this ordnance (or 30 months of the Community Development Director approves a 12 month extension as allowed under Section 18.120.040 of the community Development Code), then the approval of the Site Development Review, Minor Partition and Conditional-Use Permit shall be null and void. The Comprehensive Plan -Ameudment and zoning Map amendment shall still be valid; however, any new site plan proposal shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. lip G• n e~ d January 19, 1994 Cathy Wheatley City Recorder City Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard. OR 97223 To Whom It May Concern: I would Like to voice my concern and objection to the plan for construction of a new Albertsons grocery store on Southwest Scholls Ferry Road and Wa?nut Streets. We already fight thousands of automobiles along Scholls Ferry, and even though the road was widened, it is still extremely busy. A new grocery store and small mall will attract even more traffic and accidents. It seems even now that Scholls Ferry has more than its share of bad car accidents. Also, there are already two grocery.stores nearby. Thriftway is at Murrayhill and certainly provides most people's needs. Then Howards also is very close at Oreenway Plaza. Please do not allow the addition of this store. Scholl's Ferry is one of the last areas in Beaverton where you can see small areas of greenery and it looks like it borders the country. People in the Murrayhill area especially really value this atmosphere. Thank you, Olga M. Spencer-Haley ]fJAN 16100 SW Nighthawk 2 0 1994 Beaverton, Oregon 97007 IBM IRIS j M, S"Pen°er wk a t~ S^`•~ ;;~~~~j,. " Olg( ,t Beaverton' OR Cathy Wheatley Recorder City City Ba11Ha11 Blvd. 131 d OR 91223 p 1 ty~,thy 111\\it\,1 6qo I'Y1-~; Cal Uut0 12356 SM 132nd Court - Tigard, OR 97223 590-4297 January 25. 1994 ~f City Council CITY OF TIORRO 13125 SU Nall Tigard, OR 97223 RE= CPR 93-0009 / ZOHI 93-0003 / SDR 93-0014 / CUP 93-0002 / MLP 93-0013 / RLBERTSOW S ]ear City Council. This proposal is a single case of nixing= "loo many vehicles trips Too few anproved roads; and Too many single-family hones; Too late. No wonder the proposal is inconsistent with Plan policies and Connunity Developnent Code provisions <see enclosed analyses>. Briefly„ the pro- posal is inconsistent with policies and provisions on= Subdivision replats; Established residential areas; Neighborhood conpatibilityz Dewelopnent access; Developnent street inprovenentsz Safe street plant and Commercial encroachment. Hare than that, the proposal is a tale of= Too few notices and Too little infffornation; Too late. Ad1h Page 2 Briefly, no one told the Planning Cowwission- The proposal would need a subdivision repl.at. The proposal mould pull as many as 78,000 daily vehicle trips into the neighborhood according to "trip generation Pates" published in the "Bible" of traffic analyses, Trip Generation. Fifth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. There is no connitnent of any kind by Shari's or Blockbuster to cone to this developnent (see enclosed letters). There are only two acres of C-H Connercial Neighborhood in the neighborhood nnw (see enclosed analysis). This proposal should be reheard by the Planning Connission so they can wake an inforwed reconnendation to the City Council. Uhy should the Council have to take all the political heat for the proposal? Sincerely, Cal UnGlery Land Use Connittee Contact Citizen Inwolvewent Tean Vest Encls. xc= Cathy `Uh--atley City Attorney Ed Sullivan Castle Hill Owners Conoittee MINES ANN, ISSUE Developnent of this eight-acre retail proposal regnnic-es the deuelo.per to replat the Castle Rill Plat and comply with all notice and hearing provisions for subdivision. The twelve-acre Tax Lot 200 located in the southeast corner of Ualnut and Scholls Ferry is also Lot 65 of the 1i e'iait. ■r.e C4z_', M1, Flat 3 _ Castle Hi nA sates no other use than the presumed residential use for this lot. Roy reconfiguration of the lot to increase the number of lots in the plat requires a replat of the plat. Rny change in use of the lot requires a replat of the plat. R replat of the Castle Rill Plat requires compliance with all notice and hearing provisions for subdivision. Reid a replat of even a . portion of the subdivision requires an application for plat vacation by all the homeowners in the Castle Hill Subdivision. BRS1S "CT3he applicant shall submit... R final Csubdlu-ision] plat... which complies with the approved preliminary plat" (CDC 18.160.140, Final Plat? "The preliminary [subdivision] plat nap and data or narrative shall include the following... The proposed name of the subdivision... The boundary lines of thm tract to be subdivided... 'ene Nruposed to con- figurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot nunbers. inhere lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indi- cated upon such lots. Each lot shall abut upon a public street" (CDC 18.160.070.0.. Preliminary Plat> . "Rny plat or portion thereof may be vacated by the ouner of the platted area at any tine prior.to the sale of any lot within the platted sub- division... R11 applications for a plat... vacation shall be made in accordance with Cnew subdivision provisions]... EHowever,] Ew]hen lots have been sold, the plat nay be vacated in the manner herein provided by all the awners of the lots within the platted area" (CDC 18.160.210„ Vacation of Flats) "Notice given to persons entitled to mailed or published notice... shall include the following information... The nature of the applica- tion In sufficient detail to apprise persons entitled to notice of the application's proposal" (CDC 18.32.140, Contents of Notice for Public Hearings' "The act of replatting shall allow the reconfiguration of lots... with- in a recorded plat... ER3eplats will act to vacate the platted lots within the replat area... Notice... shall he provided... to the owners of property adjacent to the exterior boundaries of the tentative sub- division replat... R replat shall comply with all subdivision proul- ,tons of this chapter and all applicable ordinances and regulations a- dopted under this chapter" (ORS 52.185, Replatting2 "The City shaii dlveci l ca aaad ;;r, .motleme temard the waintenance and istprovenent of established residential areas by... Designating... "established areas" connitted to residential developnent within the planning area... Ulthin the "established areas" new de=velopnent will be of the sane type and density in order to protect the character of existing neighborhoods" (Tigard Cowprehensive Plan. Uolune II. Housing. Policy 6.3.7. Established Residential Rreas) "In all phases of the developnent approval process in a residential "established area". a priwary consideration of the City shall be to preserve and enhance the character of the adjacent established areas" (Tigard Conprehensive Plan. Uolume II. Housing. Policy fiZ.3. Estab- lished Residential Rreas) "D11 officials... of the City vested with authority to issue pernits or grant approvals shall adhere to and require conforwance with this title. and shall issue no permit En]or grant approval for any develop- went or use which violates or fails to comply with conditions and ;,tan- dards Imposed to carry out this title... Rny perch or approval issued or granted in conflict with the prowisions of this chapter shall be void- (CDC 18.20.010. Official Rcti.on> 17AMW ISSUE The intensity of this eight-acre retail proposal is incompatible with the surrounding single-family subdivisions and inconsistent with the Plan policies which protect platted subdivisions and existing neigh- borhoods. Retailers here mould generate as many as 18,000 daily vehi- cle trips in the neighborhood on any Saturday according to "trip gen- eration rates" published in Trip uenera%lon, Fifth Editlun, by tom itr- stitute of Transportation Engineers CITED. This would qaudruple the existing 6,000 daily vehicle trips in the neighborhood. BASIS "Impact Rssessment... The scale and intensity of the project shall be compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the provisions of this plan" <Tigard Conprehensive Plan, Uolune II, Locational Criteria, Policy 12.2.1. Connunity Connercial> "The City shall direct its land use actions toward the maintenance and improvement of established residential areas by... Designating... -established areas" connatted to residential Jevelopnent within the planning area... Ulthin the "established areas' new development will be of the sane type and density in order to protect the character of 4Ai.-/~f :y :zeic3,kb3rEeceds" CT:Lgard Camprehermiwe Plan, U ll u ne II, Policy 6.3.1. Established Residential Rreas? "In all phases of the development approval process in a residential -established area". a primary consideration of the City shall be to preserve and enhance the character of the adjacent established areas <Tigard C_anprehensIve Plan, UeI umne :11. Hefum? ng. Policy 6.3.3. Estab- lished Residential Rreas) ITE TRIP GEMERRTIOH SUKHRRV RLL0URBLE RETRIL USE WKURY SRT SUN C-C SO FT ITE ITE ITE ITE RETRILER CODE TRIP TRIP TRIP Rlbertson's 40.000 n50 n/a 7,120 6,640 Pizza Hut 4,000 8319 2,528 2,744 2,064 Taco Tine 3.000 834 1,896 2,056 1,548 RRCO an/pn 3.000 853 n/a 5.568 4.929 Snall Sloops 7,000 820 644 826 287 I57 , 008 n/a 18,316 15.460 Daily vehicle trips generated from trip generation rates published in T,g9_,,@ Generation, Fifth Edition, ITE <trip generation rates are not available for all days nor all uses). Aft ISSUE Development of this eight-acre retail proposal requires the developer to inprove Heel Scholls Ferry Road with bike laneCss and sa_d_-walkCsl to protect cyclists and pedestrians frow the intensified traffic hazard generated by retailers here. The only access to this eight-acre retail proposal is the uniwproved, two-lane New Scholls Ferry Road. Hearly all customers cowing here would use this uniwproved street for access. Retailers here would divert as navy as 18,000 daily vehicle trips from the nearby, fully-iwproved, five-lane, Old Scholls Ferry Road. New Scholls Ferry Road has serious bike and pedestrians safety problens now. It has no street lights, no bike lanes nor sidewalks. The traffic gen- erated by retailers here would intensify the bike and pedestrian hazard on this unimproved Street. BASIS "Access... The proposed connunaty connerciai district shall not be anticipated to create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problen. Such a deternination shall be based on... the traffic generating char- acterlstics of the roost intensive uses allowed in the zone" CTigard Comprehensive Plan, Uolune II, Locational Criteria, Policy 12.2.1, Connunity Connercial) "The City shall require as a precondition to developnent approval that Individual developers participate in the iwprovenent of existing streets, curbs and sidewalks to the extent of the development's in- pacts,.. Street inprovenents be made... when the development is found to create or intensify a traffic hazard" CTigard Comprehensive Plan, Uoluwe II, Transportation, Policy 8.1.3> ITE TRIP GEHERRTIOH SUWWRRY RLLOURBLE RETAIL USE UKURY SAT SUH C-fC SO FT ITE ITE ITE ITE RETAILER CODE TRIP TRIP TRIP Rlbert5on's 40,000 850 n/a 7,120 6,640 Pizza Hut 4,000 834 2,528 2,7'14 2,064 Taco Tine 3,000 834 1,896 2,058 1,548 ARCO an/pro 3,000 853 n/a 5,568 4,929 Snall Shops 7,000 820 644 826 207 57,000 n/a 118,316 15,468 Daily vehicle trips generated fron trip generation rates published in Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, ITE (trip generation rates are not available f®r all days nor all uses). I 71AML ISSUE The application for this. eight-acre retail proposal is iintiwely until the Ualnut Street Extension is opened. The intersection here is in- aste7~± m"Ith the Plan standard which requires two najor collectors to provide access to the site. The only access here is fron the r;nlan i.Ucs- proved Hem, Sch"_ l s FerrV Road and the vv.. . 'a-c--.eae wro1_ed ].iuL Street. i toners coning to the site would generate as many as 18.000 daily vehi- cle trips. The wajority of custowers cowing here mould he unin- proved New Scholls ferry Road for access. But, wany of then would use the local streets in the Cotswold and Pebble Creek Subdivisions as a shortcut to reach the site. This intensified custoner traffic on local residential streets would be a serious safety problen. Pernitting such intensified traffic mould be inconsistent with the Plan policy which requires the City to plan for a safe street systen for current and fu- ture developnent.' And this new connercial traffic mould encroach into the Cotswold and Pebble Creek Subdivisions. Allowing such cowwercial traffic mould be inconsistent with the Plan policy which requires the City to ensure that new cownercial developnent will not encroach into established residential areas. BRSIS "flccess... Sites should either be located at or eAjacent to an inter- section of a najor or ninor collector street.with an arterial or at the intersection of two najor collector streets" (Tigard Coaprehensive Plan Uoluwe II. Locational Criteria, Policy 12.2.1. Connunity Cormercial, "This district is intended to be located adjacent to several residen- tial neighborhoods. ideally at the intersection of two or gore wajor collector streets or at the intersection of an arterial and a collector street" <CDC 18.61.010, C-C Conwunity Connercial District) "The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway systen that needs current needs and anticipated future growth and developnent" CTigard Comprehensive Plan, Uolune II. Transportation. Policy 8.1.1) "The City shall ensure that new connercial and industrial developnent shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been de5tgnated for connercial or industrial user." <Tigard Cowprehensive Plan, Uoluwe II. Econony. Policy 5.1 .4) "In all phases of the developnent approval process in a residential "established area'". a priwaryr consideration of the City shall be to preserve and enhance the character of the adjacent established areas" (Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Uolune II. Housing. Policy 6.3.3, Estab- lished Residential Areas) I TB ENT PARR • 1• 1 1 ® D ='emb-_* 2110-013 Mr. Cal Woolery Land Use Subcommittee Contact Citizen Involvement Team West 12356 S.W. 132nd Court Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Retail Site at Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon. Dear Mr. Woolery: In response for your letter of December i5, 1993, BLOCKBUSTER Video may very well be named as a tenant/purchaser in a land use request pertaining to a retail site in your neighborhood in Tigard. I am familiar with the site but I do not have an agreement to occupy any buildings on that site at this time. I am not certain that Trient Partners dba BL OCKBUS EER Video will open a store on this site in the future. I am therefore unable to tell you exactly what this store might look like at this time. None of our stores are open 24 hours a day seven days a week. Our normal operating hours are 10:00 A.M. to Midnight 365 days a year. Our hours are slightly modified for certain holidays. Until such time as it may be necessary, I am unwilling to disclose to you how many customers might visit our store daily. I hope this answers your questions adequately. May you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Sincerely, John David Grisebaum President JDG/svs 250 Market Place Tower • 2025 First Avenue • Seattle, Washington 98121 • (206) 728-7070 • Fax: (206) 728-0908 m January 5, 1994 Cal Woolery 12356 S.W. 132nd Court Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Wooiery: I have received your letters and am somewhat confused by your inquiry. This piece of property is only one of many parcels that we may review from time to time. Before any final decision or commitment is made to any site, we conduct a comprehensive Alft examination which has not been completed in this case. For your information, Shari's is a 24-hour family restaurant. As to design, we would point to our restaurant at Murray & Allen in Beaverton as an example of our current style. Should you require additional information, please let us know the purpose of your request and the objectives of your organization. Thank you for your Intarest. Sincerely, J rry R. e Sr. i e esident - Development AML SHARI'S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 8205 S.W. Creekside. Place Beaverton, Oregon 97005-7112 (503) 641-6338 Fax: (503) 646-3185 ISSUE There are only two acres of Coemwercial Neighborhood CC-H1 in the northeast corner of New Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. The City failed to apply the two-acem tclze 11=4-t ;eF he v-N here in con- fornance with the Plan size standard. The City failed to neet the burden of proving any wore than two acres of C-H here was in eonforn- ance with the Conprehensive Plan. The City's 1966 approval for any wore than two acres of C-H here is void. In 1983 and 1984, the City approved "approxinately four acres" of "interim" C-H on the west side of 135th under the City's 1983 planning agreenent with the County to keep the City's Plan consistent with the County's Plan. Because the County had approved "2-4 acres" of "'Neigh- borhood Commercial" C"HC-) on the west side of 135th, the City approved "approxinately four acres" of "interior" C-H next to 135th. In 1986, the City approved "shifti.ng" five or wore acres of C-H to Hew Scholls Ferry and Murray Roads. By that tine, the City's planning agreenent with the Caunly had expired. Upon "shifting" the C-H, time City's Plan becane inconsistent with the County's Plan. First, the City located the C-H next to New Scholls Ferry Road where the County had always opposed a conercial area. Rnd second, the City increased the C-H size to five or wore acres while the County had linited-a con- nercial area to "2-4 acres" . Maybe "approxinately four acres" of "intertn"' C-H next to 135th was innune froa any Plan standard under the City's planning agreenent with the County. But, the C-H in the northeast corner of Hew Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street was not innune from the Conprehensive Plan in- cluding the two-acre size limit for C-H. First, the County's planning agreement had expired-before the C-H "shift" here. Rnd second, tP-:t C-H location and size here were inconsistent with the County's Plan. BRSIS "Neighborhood commercial centers are intended to provide convenience goods and services within a cluster of stores:.. Site size C_7 Two acre naxinun" [Tigard Conprehensive Plan, Uolune II, Locational Cri- teria, Policy 12.2.1. Heighborhood Connercial> "EPlan3 policies and locational criteria apply to both legislative and quasi-judicial land use actions. Confornance of quasi-judicial land use actions with... the Conprehensive Plan shall he deternined by eval- uation of the relationships between the proposed action... and the... locational criteria... The burden of proving conformance of the pro- posal to the Conprehensive Plan should nary with the degree of change and iapact on the connunityc the wore drastic the change and the great- er the inpact, the wore strictly the criteria should be construed" CTi- gard Conprehensive Plan, Uolune II, Locational Criteria, Introduction) -Each developnent and use application and other procedure initiated under this title [Community 0evelopnent Coden3 shall be consistent with l the adopted conprehensive plan of the City of Tigard... Oll provisions of this title shall be construed in ;ronfornity with the adopted conpre- hensiue plan" CCOC 10.10.010. Consistency with the P:ian) e~_ ""Bll officials... of the City vested with authority to issue pernits or grant approvals shall adhere to and reaulre e-enfermmnce th th!! 5 title- and eha;. 1amue no permit Cn]or grant approval for any develop- nent or use which violates or fails to comply with conditions and stan- dards inposed to carry out this title... Bny pervai.t or approval issued or granted in conflict with the provisions of this chapter, shall be void'" (CDC 18.20.010; Official Hctiol ""B Neighborhood ConnerciaPl center is planned on the northmest corner of E135th and the extension of Hurral This connercial area shall be from 2-4 acres in sizez the site size and shape will depend largely on the alignment of Ethe extension of Hurray3"" CUashington County Bull Mountain Connunity Plan, Connunity Design, Northern Triangle) "REQUEST= The City of Tigard is requesting Conprehensive Plan anend- nent : and frbn Uashington County designation Neighborhood Conner- cial to City of Tigard designation Connercial-Neighborhood on approxi- mately 4 acres... On June 23, '1983, the Portland Metropolitan Brea HoundarV Connissiun annexed the subject properties to the City of Ti- gard. In Jame 1983. the City aw. eed to utilize the County's land use designationEsa for the annexation area. These designations were close- ly watched to City designations... There are two remaining issues to - be resolved concerning the EConnercial Neighborhood] area. The first issue concerns the location of the area... The second issue concerns the size of the [Connercial Heighborhoodl area. The County comprehen- sive plan has designated 4 acres for connercial area while the City's locational criteria sets a 2 acre naxinun. Blthough the acreage is ex- cessive according to standard, staff believes that during this interim tine. before the final developnent plans are reviewed including read alignments, the designated acreage is appropriate" <Staff Report of July 12. 1983 for CPB 10-83 I Krueger Conprehensive Plan Anendnent> "This letter is In confirnati.on that no agreement between the Planning Directors of Uashington County and Tigard to amend the conprehensive plan is necessary to develop 105 acres of land north of Bull Mountain as represented by Ryan O'Brien's letter, dated Hovenber 11, 1983. In that Hovenbaer 11th letter,... Mr. O'Brien requested a plan anendnent to relocate certain neighborhood connercial developnent north from the site shown on the Bull Mountain Connunity Plan Hap. Such anendnent is not necessary to wove the location north. as he has indicated, as long as it is sited adjacent Eto3 S.U. 135th Bvenue... H5.1 connunIcated to you Eby] telephone last month, Nashi.ngton County staff saw three incon- sistencies between earlier developnent proposals for this property be- longing to Russ Krueger and the Washington County Comprehensive Plan... Third, the planned location of a neighborhood connercial site was in- consistent with the Connunity Plan. The Bull Mountain Plan located a" Neighborhood Connercial CHC> site at the intersection of S.U. 135th Bvenue and Murray Boulevard extension Cwherever this :intersection is finally a19.gned>... The developnent proposal last reviewed for this property sited .the neighborhood connercial uses off Scholls Ferry Road rather than S.U. 135th Bvenue. However. the development proposal re- presented by the Hovenber 11th letter is consistent Cas far as it goes) with the County Conprehensive Plan and addresses the above concerns. Ask The site for the neighborhood connercial uses has nee been changed to S .U . 135th Hvenue"" <Uashington County Planning Departnent Letter of Decenber _5, 1983 to Tigard Plarm- ng Direr: airi -RPPLICRTIOH= Cowpra=i.c.w plan Rwendwent and zone change to relocate a neighborhood conmercial designation frow tree ®vet Ride of 135th flue- nue to the east side of New Scholls Ferry Road... ER3ss you way recall, the applicant always wanted to locate this cowwercial Esite3 along Scholls Ferry Road, but was prevented fron doing so by Washington Coun- t". Currently, Uashin,2*nn Ent--- tl ha= no legal coatral aue' ':ills appJ'l- cation, because this site Iswithin ~the Tigard City Lln1ts" C Krueger Rppltcation for Cowprehensive Plan Rwendwent of February 29, 1985D "REQUEST= To wove the present area designated C-H CCowwercial Neighbor- hood) frow the west side of 135th Rvenue to a location on the north side of the Murray Road extension, approxiwately 500 feet west of 135th Rvenue... FINDINGS... Locational Criteria... The site is proposed to be enlarged to 5 acres in size rather than the 2 acre Estandard3 set forth in the Plan. REn3 Eapproxiwately3 4 acre Einteriw3 size was es- tablished when the property was annexed to the City in order to be con- sistent with the Washington County Plan which applied prior to the an- nexation. Since this expansion represents a further departure firow a- dopted Plan Policy, staff recowwends that the 4 acre Einteriw3 liwit be retained" CTigard Planning Staff Report of February 4, 1906 for CPR 1-86 ! grueger Cenprehensive Plan Rwendwert) -VHERERS, the applicant has requested a Conprehensive Plan flnendwent and Zone Change to shift the existing area zoned C-H CCowwercial Neigh- borhood) frow the side of 135th fluenue to a location on the north side of the proposed Murray Blud extension approximately 500, feet west of I35th Rue MHERERS, the Planning Cowwisslon reviewed the proposal •ith a r_®ndition that the on February 4.' 1986 and rec sewwendea apptru::al C-H designation not exceed four acres in size THE CITY OF TIGRRD ORDRINS RS FOLLOUS=... The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as discussed in the February 4,,1°96 Planning staff repbrt to the Planning Cowwission... The City Council upholds the Planning Cow- wission's recowwendation for approval... Eexcept3 the cowwercial desig- nation will be located Ein the northeast corner of Scholls Ferry and Murray3 as shown in Exhibit B Eand the cowwercial designation will be five acres in size3. The configuration of the flare acre C-H designa- tion way be Efurther enlarged and3 wodified to conforw with the final alignwent of Murray Blvd." CTigard Ordinance 86-12 of February 26, 1986 for Rpproval of CPR 1-86 / Krueger Cowprehensive Plan Rwendwent) mill . - ._.,,u... _ , _ _ ,.a, a. _ _ 1 ~ ' , t . _ neon r .,..t - ;r ~ i,. _ _ ~ 1 ~ ki,~: r~ .}-1 Li,'u" • d _ ~ . PORTLAND ~ . u.eeersm+s ' 1 ' , ! r I. ~ r i - t ; - ,p I_~ I w..l. 1 ~ 1. r I _ _ . • I i...SMYAY. ~ .A ~ _r a l' ~ h: Y , . 1 t~ 1.1 - i~ I V... ~i I;~~~ ~v, f ••,Y' ' \ - - • ietwx I ,a,..w ~ YINAAtltlN61N16 _ I~, ~ Il~ _ rauio .r ..'1116 ~ 'i""_ 'I i II I. 1 I I t~iLp - li l.~ ~ ' . ~ ~ - 1111 ~ ~ . - ~ ~ I a I - nl I~' r vv 4 ~ o~.., I _ - ~~Ewe.-`:ixoeemwxts ~ ~ i .7 I {I I y. li ~ "tll ~ - t, ~ , i i' I - f r _ ,p • IV I i " ' - ~ ' . Ingo a uea , . e. I:a r "y'-9L'F I 1 , ~ _ _ . l voer no i, ~ _ _ 1 . .I ~ .n -Ixa, .fr°~ .a,. L... _etowus~ h , .i ,~r3 ~c . 1a - _ q ~ ` ~ ~Y~. 4 it i . I.. - 1 i . ' II _ I rfu I _ ~ ~~{I i~ - I~«nr I' ~1 I ~ Ig(.1„r~ - , 1~_ff I` _ r ~ P . ~ ~p FfF . _ i / I . _ . > ~ voRrw++n ~ - y ..y +T rr.~~,_. , ~ u ~ i - ` ~ _ . r ..o _ ~ I' ~ . ~ ` y 1 _ F~7 I ~ I . )"b _.9~-._ S l ~ _I_ J. ~~'y' $11- Fye d I - 11i -o:. rt~ G , -.0 = _ r , > I ~f 1 e . - • . ~ ~ ~ or .a 9`. - v r , . • , ,y -fir ~ t i`I'" i'~. ~ ~J 4 p . ti 1. L. -f .A e ~ I ~I I I L~`; , x - . I I _ _ - a.-..ee"a.,,.c.. f ~y ` / , , , I .4• a• - - V ~ - - t- , "s i _ i X11 a_1 df `~Ir ?•5 I FI, I. , I' 'n • e „ ~ _ I . _ ~ + ' . , , j ,~7 ,y1 „7:~~51`}r. i i 1 ~F iF I! 1 noe q .I _ _ A r I ~ ~ ~L , ,~II . 1 ~ I• I b I I w_ • _ \ _ 1• 1 - ._iit ~ I _ I X ~ 1 , ~ I 11 i YTji~~ . i l_,~ - E... _ . -r il', . _ 31 .1 ~ ~c FAIAYLLW' - Ll: M~ r ~ I _ _ I"W 'r ~i1~' i ~.I _ ' 1~ I ~ w.~ . 11„`• • 7i4r 1 1 III * i.l~l:'I 'Ih ~ 1 II 1 ,I~ ,I 1,~ & ~r ~ 3 1 _ oa , 3i- _ li III 4 ~ - - I I ~.i _ _ • \ _ eu~y o~ ~ {"rf ~d: - I 'II'I ;~f ~ , I ,I .,I• q ; 1 k~, j 1 ii I - I~ , _ 4 e . , ~ I ,J III.. .I 'a. # r~: .I d I ',ICI a ~ I i" X611-,+ I ~ T . ~ f _C ~ _fK-(~ . >4 i ~ "L9" ~ I ,i "l~• i I I I• I' I ~ I - _ •Tr~ '~T y~ 4nfr II ~"xP 1 1Y0. Y ..~f, .i. 'F ~ 81. , \ . . ~ y p, d ' ~ ~ ~w 4~.. •d; I .{1 E _ ''1` I- '1 I° II vT wr \n.. Y ~t(I =r" '}I„"' 'I!y ~ t :I ! I ~ .h d. :,i I~ I. i 1. _ \ I'~. t _ ~ - Y, _ ~ ^`"y. 1^'a :1.. a _I I~ ' E.. _ w~, r . - yy ~~e I I Y ' y X71 '{'~+cteµ.,, 3~ ~.'p 1'; 1 I I: i ~ 1Gf . ' ~d I•` 'raw' IY f ,x ~o VI`• 1 ^ 1 1 ` 11 ~ n .1~ i _ • ~ Tti I' Y,..." ls: ~I ~ .s a 4",~ 6 1 I I xx7 ff~ y~ ii 99 . (1 Y.., ci ti, V ~ I i i ~~i .:'7s~' e~ ' 1:r YGYEAIOX ~ h ~r•^. ~t.`~` :t. _ I l~ a. . ,di',1 1 f 4'T. yl lil lb`~ .1~ ~ per- 7 ~ ~I:' / r . I. ~ ,~_I~i~,t!v °a~. •utj~~' ~z 't'.'1'•~y.•-- ~ I a' -"+i ' U'~~i~rtl~'r - t ,II v _ _ I --L4 y+'! Br; { y~~ l I r~~ ~ 4.. }IA. Ai~...Y~~'.c'5' I,: ~ r.^..1 !~1 1 3, ij.~ ,n ft ~i k; stl l1m"~~5~t]Ie 'A ~.I I~ ~ - ~T93. } "I~{,;<' - - U8121196 IIIII~IIYpUI IUUUpIII! I I~II;~!IJD I glllUpllll Ulllllpl!U I!I!IIUIOIU IIIIUgIAU I glpllpl!D I IUIIUppll I glUp p;lUl I pl~i~!III~ I~PDppll , . 1 - ' I III 1111111 IIIIIIII I~IIINIII~II ~III011 ~IIII IIIIIItiI llllbll llOIIIII IIIImIIIIIILII NIIIN IIIIIIIII IIII~ IIIWIIIIIIIIIIYIIIIIIIIII~IIINIIIIII Illilouf IIIINIIIIIItl ~Vldll III Illllltl WIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIY ~ i - 1 ' '1 ~=s'N';`Pt~t ~ tl'"'77'Y'7i"-N" I'pelt'7"I'9" A 77 _ y p°+P"7`~. t t~-:jy^(.I 11 s p:rmj,:u?~i (w rCl nyl K (~.zpm>em~•-utH.•::,Hm 111•Ix11111dU1..li INUIUIIUIIIIIIIII.7.UHIIHII1111111.....NlJJ~IIIIIIUIIIIUIIIIINIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIilllwxtll:It:idIIIINNIIIIIINH1Ht111111fIIIIINIIIIIIII:UIINIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU~111tlliRI1dI1111111111II11111111111111UIIIIttt~IwuwwluuwuwnwlUwwnlul~r/..,. ~r' p,L>.r t -'I"" ! I ^ " . 6..., I; P r° I'""'+'7~"nTT%~"I' II':'1 I , , "'`'A 1€.!i ! ,l 1' u I f 1If 4'"'ul . ! q n+~l•` x:n! 1" 3' 1 P P;" P~`l!'^'7' nu nwaluu ulnwl luu uw a uu uuu•uuuuxl•w! nnn:o•:un•.!euxxxxuumnux•nuxl nwunnuunnnuNlm NNllunuwluuN;uu• ` IUIIU•1~1{111IUIIII IIaIN1111111NN{IIIIIIIIIIIN4INIIUNUUI4W~UINN•IIIIIIUIIIIII IIIN wwl IIIINIIIININillll•11111•Ihlllillil 111 f r p A I`"~'"•t nr, TA + ~ i I'4'A f t~ "P "li +i~'A'"i~A'~Ti "!?-'tli 6F 111 Ipll S IP~I I ! IP NI Ill~bu . N! 11Ff 111 J t!'°' uN 1' '6FLG" ~'li"'J .1P 7. f 15 fk°" !a'P'' WWI.Lx11Wx x1111 uu.~_r.lilNw NW1NW111u WIIIIIII Wwlllllll WIIII 1!!11111 IN Hr 111111 IIWIIttJlI IIIIIU1xW 1 wN1114 xW11W 1WN tiLLU wiNNU IUIW IIYIII IIW IIIIWIIWIx IIIIIYII NI NII I•I lu IN.11:111tu 1.... 1~°" `P"~ L t t ( I~^.9G"'~ rs ~I In °^rl l.,.zl r T4 F'?4'" ! "'~~-t! Ti' fi ft C[u "'Pf r t ~':7 ~'6~4 ttfi I~"'A '~fl""~ i! 1 P. ~ t :':"A i,`~11 : i'~'' !F"'r { _ www w , -:CC ~ uuwwmw~uluuuH`r wuuuulllwltiiuulwuuuuwl '"""'"n7ipliuuii"uwuuuulwinuluiiu wwuunuwiii"nuuuliiiwiiinn"nmwunmw iiiliniiiiiliiiiii"nii iiiiniiiil`Iti;uiuwiiiiliuiliuwuwwiiiuuud m i""-+ T i i I' f I ! 7 1 FH 1 ~L ""°'9P ] 7!'!"Yt ! !I: "~m~t ~'tl '°t~"'.: 5711'!f?'t"°''INfkA li"^°I i'"iy uf'I"If f"'i i ^9°li~"''t"'rn p ;r i . >~nl ~ uuw, „»ww , 1 IN 11.11111 IIII xlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllx1111 IIII IIIIINII II II IIIxI1W11 rWllllllllx ll.xllllllt e•`•I NIIIUIiNllwl•i ,...T ..1 . ~ a; x: _ s p s>•'t~ s p p , rn>, i n : S t t tl I i Ili' ~-U?i~'"1~ ~IPi='I'., i~" il`''li i=u'" 3S"' .~i!7u,Tri•~ r:T°itt~ hill IIIII i•i i•iUinl,ll•l~ldlluiiuiii 1• Illl• ni • I ~ " I I ~ I u 1:11 I ' ~ f r J _ _ I IIII hIIIIdltlniiGhill (IIII•I•I•nl••Nnnnnl•I~111•I•illlli•1•Id•Ild•1111111•I•I•l•IGII11aIlIl•I•iPut~i i111L• 1: Iiiilil uliiii1711W litb:u .^•f r•: •lu-*a::^ :1 i:S:P:vn mflw: rl:na l'~ uurya 11141a;nnei .•~n~•n:., mC:: ~iiu •,_•m I:: # ~ = + .Ir'sinlll ~ v ..i i» m.:.l 1 It 1 Iln iiinilimtlr.IIII•I•nllll•IIIIIIIIII•x111111•Ililllll•IIIII•i•Illtll•IIGIII•IIUMIfIIIhI III•I.411111•I.1• I•I•bllliii IIIIIWlll•1411111111111111111.1.111111•Illdiillliill•I11111Iliiiii iii~ii iii111G1111111111~111•II11d11111111111.111 IIIIIIII• ~ i• li , ~ i'1 - "'1' i~ •i " r i ' ii: I I m II Idlt 6Wnn Inns 1111•1116nutlll I II I IUn F ~ 4 ~I• I'1!'°x ~ ° 1"'" 1' .4I i~l'•~I' li s, .,,Ill cn p^•~ is m..s x t•a••Iwl -;:/t;w. ..t i^I I.114111M1u•1PI1,1.111 I•}I•Illlhllivlx i 1 • L • r 1 1 u.l . I III al • I ~~1 P 1 u I ill I III•,tF 1 L i • +•I l l na 111 » ^ 11 nNMll•111111dlLl•II1w11Lxndnn1111WNNUiii,Ii4;di1i11111111UA41111niL I.111a61u,nuUl)•: nlll•I Illlfiilhll_L111 nulo: IIH16Ihw I na~l•116x rlll t ,•11116NilhHll•Unehlil u•lunnulllllllbnluuddlll•I.1.111111111biiGll{ 'i;•:...,' : W'} :•c.,, I x t. , N.,,L ,J i «.r•. ~ it ! i..llu :.H~i?n ~ ~ W 1 .'~'S;u. IrT N"i! r Ixl sIa` t YI u i~i uIUIWW6I•I~uWllubUl•U•I•wWIWI•tilwi;ilww4lGl•I•)•I~1)'lli1w1L•wl•1•JIl1U•ll1ilIQ•)liu•1.1•I•IUWuuuwil1Wi11•Ui;;iNhad•Ul•1•II~Lw•n,•dluulL• iL•iHmUlll)blli Gllllr•GGiFlllliuu nd;w).iliililuiiil+Ili;kilUnb,Lii6bidtili;nllallld•1.11~41~1 lil n ~i r 1~..»~1^ - T- ~,r. 1:,:•:f. In 1...111 - r F ^I I n:- •tt» 13 ~ : x § B1•wl•ulll•W4)•Ihl!•Iw•uuuwulliilul617U1•IWInllllilnlilll•I•IIII•u~ll•I•I•IIIIIWIIIMUiIIu•~•I I•IIWll IIII•L1111WIWHIUiiiilll li•nn•II•III•luill•ll•lil,,ilWlwlhu iLWti i•IW16•ilrl~uil•~•L1~ 1111GWIGAiii4u i itnGUIIfGItaWWl.ll!Ilil ~`.,I»119 dlll•II~INIFI - I 1 T J4 i:l x i I I' i S n'.I ^r 1•e it 1 , P>Ft 1 i I ~ i' 1 ~ycp w ~l n Iti,.w ~ •IiJlll'J;,, ,.I ..I. .1 ~i. :.li ..i.:n nl~l., ..r ~ :-•~.1,~ -.rI W. )n;ll. F, 1a16u•nnl•Il•UUIIIIIIIUI•I.11.6116,JIU1Ln,•1•laaruullllll 11411111111111•i}ilbllul•n14i nir11111dLluull!•11111.1•II llI•liniiiill IiTii161Gnn11111.111.11•IGiliiiillllidliliinunlaul•14uullunNl•1IL"ulal•I•Iluli6uullxbil IW~ ~1.611•}•1•W44WN wll•w•I no-WII11J•fii nap.•I•Ir: G s I 'H r r, ! I F ~ .:.»I'u ~'p r:.•"a"m•_^:"'" I 1 , P . f? ~ , "'H°= i:Fl°; X11 islliui.ibGi, iiiiifliiiiniitinW~ llriiiln 11111IIIIIIuIILbfillil)~u`Inilli•Hrlil•Ilhiliinun 111144114111GI lull•I.1116U4111•I1111•u•I•IIIWI~1111111611m•u~~•na•1141•I.1 a u11111111161iilUUI~IIIuIIGllhhlllli111111 Il ill~lw`191111I11ia161lillhilllliUliliiilh:,lil~•iiUl ~^v.:.-t;~ ~.^:_^}t 1 r. r is 14 t (...tli. , Itl ~itmttpn- (ir, r. x r,s i.ixs I, 'tl t"~ '~~•I F_ 1..,»»• ~,..»..r .,1111411 1 '.:..i:ul ~ 11 1 ~''rH - •..G _ ul~dtuWWl•uWUlWiiiiGGi l1•I•Yr„r,•hlulluuuuuW111.1•WIIUII16iuiu49111p11 iliuull WSwllAll•WlWlll ldlwumnl na•lallulllnl411•L11nIII410111n:111.1'iidrr,H•uurrilmiill11111111111111111di7u1(1111141111ii1171U11nllui111i!•iliilillFlUilitllillilllilllii 1'-i~?`" ;a ! 1 I .3't'"'IS' 41 1111`Aril9ff S? r.l:~ .i .7 ..»:1 r~'if•`I .JI"~TMI°In ?""-xm' p ~ Fx:'I'~n?='.I"N.•=1.• .i.•^,~: 1- Ill"` 1 '1_ '(1I1II11Illih 1111111 IIII•IllliFo-l•IIII41•I•I•I•}•I•Illlur illhll llirilGiGml IIIII I• liiililaaa•n ma•In•o-wl dwn rlnmd 1611 I III•IIIGI 461 ulll•liiliiidillilnnll~::Inlunuluii»nlhllil•IIII•mino-llllillUilhllil~llllld"nillliillilniilluvi i u NIIIII II~IUIII111 ~6Fkr'w~w ~ ~9,xxx;ll 1 ~ Ir, ~ ,1 i :11 :Ima~wl,;c;;nn.pnp:x:lt~r a i 3Ht1~^•im.mny~rp~, n.pm•~rn ji - { _ 1. LI 11 ; ~ " • ( 144111161111111111411iiIIIIIIINilliiil6tlu116111111•iilillla•tl1i1dIIL,111. lluun~hiiluUilllllllill(IIPIilI11111iIIIII41Pll ' 1 I } _ I- - q:4mrtll:,~ nll.i=:~rl I "~x. 1 ,M m tI.M- s it - r ~ ' ,'il , a ` i I II I0u I IIII uuu I Ii I IIIII lluunl hlinlllll ll6 uIWIgNIUU11nIII iI I INIIUUII I~G1 uWlnmj Wlln1l l•I l l l l tl iun :1• ` _ . - ~ 1 ~ ~ _ - - -1 ~ >a' t8 (tl s. u i rsc s+ + ,•m~x n Iv :7n. a l~,••• •lix• i I IIIIIIII ~ i ~ I ~ ~ : ' ~ ` II III 1116uuw , xlllbillll4lliilhll•IIIILn1111111 w uninuunnun111141111nnIlIUPo61 nllulhln ull IB 5N11111 innlll j I i r •J~L - I a 1 !1 ? p i S" y"">" r 'x1('. a Mn I n'r::r f »~I°' q 4 'r f^;1•, r i 1 ~ .~~,2: 1 1 :I 1'I II I~ II ' 11} I t , / , I. A.: 1 N 1111 n11 (IIII I nlll inml4uu IIII 1111.1 Unrlllllll III wI 11.1 I I I NunnnF n 1 ul NfIII iuiunN ulUl nll III 11114 'G~~ 4 . ~ fir, r •~~.t ~ .Ttt? e , 1 n a. Ii,1':y SIPII"'"I°* } I'S'"~ g~ ~„`y 4r- !I, ~k: I 1 1 t ~~(iiilWiiI1111111111 unnltiinnlllll~l~ll•iiYliilltlii'nN141xlalletIIIIIIIuINIiI1PPiiii117141111111r1iiGilllihlli ll llllliil Gy,1,.5'3" I••yy.. _ ° _ ~ sl r• a .l ! ,~I"'" P° ~ F!";. t•, 1 tn,::Iapn nq; ~J ~ f ~ 411 •1 _ 1111 FlllrtllHllllllill IIIIIIIIII Ilill 1.11111 III 11111111111 ~ I,II•,H111 It 11 1 1111 IIII tl 16n111 YYIYIi II! nI11Y1411111(IIIII IIII ' ~ I ~ I _ _ ~ III. ! f•• 1 ' f 1 , !"""tt+" r "n- l r r• ra8 °"""„r",."" S r = 1~, a 111841 IIU I nulGJlliiiilm a iiill:illli ninull nh uulllll6)i~d m Intlu`uiriiidllhlnlilll III iiun611i111111141i1114i ilL 1' _~+4! ' _ Neil-. \p .l I r,;~' - t II ~ r , I I 1 F e1 ~ r - I - BI I < ~ _ _ _ - , - i - :11 - i~f l l ~ - ~ - - 00 _ °i . , : C ` h ~ • s - I _ ~ ~ I~ ,.9,1 0 ! - - ~ - y - n 1 ~ ° ^ . I• , u + b / ' ~ ' ~ ~ 1lt ,1 ~ _ -r-~ ' ---1-- - 6 I` . ✓ 1 l I ti ~ ~ ~ I. I - ~}'`1;11 ~ 1 ~4tr~F ~ 35t _-~:~1 , ~ 1 l~ X i I s 9 1 ~ J.x ~l i)._ , ~ - - ~ _ ~ 111 wl - 1 r • I , r 8€. _ IIIII I1 I I uu a 111 II II lill11111IIIIHII ~ Il U6nw rn 4 w I III ludh lUl I I I101I II IlilNxNllt hnuNxum rd• '7_ I Y~ I f tt I IF 1 t. ~•T ,t°,H I ~u •7 f... t _P i ~ - ~ fIIIIIIillilihlulbhlll•I Ilhbiiiiinll•Illllbllll~lli iilnnnnlunlll141ll11i1 ILIiI II I! 1 nll II14u Illlllluulll.n nullnl III IIII ' -i i"-7• iC i.:( 1•(I,IS, li M _ 1 u,~i .~~s1 t71 'r• .1 I` ' ~ .i~J~ I Ixl~ltnnuillliill6191111 {•!+iuliiiiliiliilnotllnn hiinaY41•I uilmm~iiiilmi liill•6f I~ 411i.uniiihilln1161IIIIbiiumiilPliiiillllllll.IliGnnlnilillblihunubuuuu•ma { lanxlll Itt6tx,;;•,I '"moon mull lunnnnninnn. . - ~ _!m r^r-w r.... IF d 1zH_ n: ice.-.fl .l:c:rrl r1YW_luliiiilihlllfil4411t•IlldlhilNlll IINUiiiill•nI1 fl II I LIIuINii Ih,uuull L u•u•ul111111 l I I IIIIIIII i III1Nwml4u 11111161In11•iwl n"i•I~IHIIu a Iii iiUlfilll IIIIIIII1111U11111 IlluNluhu NIHIbNia I II mrN II 11 • ~ , , W:rH 1:..1- , , n"(I „„,t r. I !:A 1 i i e t""•~:` Il;;`t (a. wr 1 i I:u :d.;c:. ~ ~ I ~r ...i.u I,1 ~ ~ I7 rI _ I N IY„ ~ uiblbWl➢1I•Ih6nllG:inliliidli111161111rouuluuW61:~,LIIiiPaiul•,unmLtlWbililllllhlillll.lln6uuJ.• ,.,.,,,,;IIIIIIIIIIUIIn4,ii4111611;6nmiJ„Hnnlldyll1111l1nnilHW;x~IIIIi911•hlii•1•Ilbli~lllll•II•wbIlllLnu 7. _ 'I'"" . " " '?U 'i ' 1 11.1.1 r 1 t ? ? • ~ " uu,nlWi ILu111iiuillil11d1WliwiiuWl I h6ni61)ll 1116NN111W61W1I•Wxuliwhn ~~ui Iu1411111LII I nIIhA111161101116111~ II gllhuul I III'' t IIINnw II uhdl nnl 1111111W41III 141 nu 141•u»HUw ! 11 s~'ll'.1' ls+:v 1I Sp'. ( - •4 2 Y H .-,:ail. _ Il ^ I. Y , _ 1 _ an ~ _ 1 ! = 11•GW 4114.41hHILYll1ilUlWlaull{{•UuvIUWhlWll I•IU•I•U•Ill;uwnl•I•N46JI•I•)•I•uwUiiiuWnL_:ILIIWui;lliiu~ WinllulU~l6m rlwi ilL JI II IWwIW uUll INJIIIIWim 16nwuHrlh u 1J ILlwll u;llll u1R uu u 61111WL6 1 ~,+>rr I, i m w I H° i l k t l :-•r••u lu I V mr.,; :I,a i:r u `!i -i x yin' jx. F' i:;: ' 611. °'~"`F.3C'•'il uli „ .:r Il_i;;;;, .:llr 1 1.," I L t:Il • ..•n• L - :1 u11Wlw•u uu nnWWll•ul~Guuul~IuiuuuG~idl•(u•wUIIWNwd 1'1.41.1 GJliiidllllu ndl I ndlll•I I I~t I IINII I'I i~larAluwiw~u~u uuW!aUIxIIIIIuWII•UI• I Ibb ihllll•I ~ '>~ililinl6~l uliuwl! uluwWilWutAN11111WI' I= "r . P}•1^ Hn rl- s r^ a wnry I' . f E ! _ _ tt.. f .,H~ I ° ~ ~ ~ it luum nlllN 1:_Willllhlllil l I'uiiblllll•6WUWii~liuwIlNIW 6111WuuiWl•ui iillIWIN il' iWU UW64! 1111 I641i l l1 U II Iil Wuuuuludunuuuw wuullUlaWu ull G411U411111 NWW IIWIiW` ~I IIuWWIU UnuG . °Z:1"I ".:r•- Ilini~[~ a - Wt i_ _i ~ i•I ro{ } I~ °"rilllhil~l•~G6G1iul•N41111QIIQ1•ii11W4i•i11111141;, • • • xg s E 6ulWbdll l u111;111' I ~ 116 111111141iwilln:nbll•n•111414W+Iau6CU 11•IluLili;1u16n nutu11141 tlll.ll ll l nul VINII.66nmwuulfll I I WI h61Wil l lllllllllmm~nm :C9 JI I Ilh. j'II r F 'T-=•~flr• lm l..l "f^ :I1 { IT.... 1 Iv i .I .1. I _ -°O°~lllllh4Vi IIUINIr-„IIIunIIUI.1111NIII41WIRilliililll11111Nd11tiIIWIII111IIII1111illlulldiirl•IliillilllltlJil•Illdildllllilluuuu ml IIII CIiiii6xA1W 11111LIII11iUlliiii{~illllllibblllullllfitu411111111i1t11 dNU6uuIl6ll•W4}~Nlliili c~'~', 1 . x "3.. F. N'} - ~.pi dF'"•t a ,:,r +....•r C.II a. i ,*r•:",.-I'~"*?,:-., _ I : > •m 1. :...111141 xan4 (•Niliiiiilll•liiii 1IlGn6nimi uuw I IIIIIIIdIII lllnihii6fifiir;llinoli6iluldNnlili91iil61dii116i1111111 innNi~ibu h. i Illiuu1444Ui6dIi16ii16 upnulliiliuiNll 1 Iltiillinlll~•ilbn ,1..111 IIIiiNlNUUiunililiriuil s °1 j z, ~ ~ ~@,i - - t, , ~ € : , a~ l~ s 1 l=i~ . _ .__._~_._..v._ 17 r. unc,i! Written Testimony--Public Hearing Continued from 12/14/93 C"" prey'evns vae Plan Amendment 93-0009/Zone Change 93-0003/Site Development Review 93-0014/Conditional Use Permit 93- 0002/Minor Land Partition 93-0013 - Albertsons Item No. Letter dated 1/14/94 from Glenn W. Geiger 1 to Tigard City Council setter from Rabbi Wilhelm to Richard Bewersdorff with 1/11/94 letter from Stewart 2 Gordon Strauss attached Letter dated 1/8/94 from Dom Virgilo to 3 City of Tigard Letter dated 1/11/94 from Mary Bosner to 4 Cathy Wheatley Letter dated. 1/4/94 from Stan & Linda Munro 5 to City Council Letter dated 12/30/93 from John C. Roberts 6 to Cathy Wheatley Letter dated 12/13/93 from Aaron & Cathy Green to '15garci amity %"..vuixCil 'a Letter dated 1/6/94 from Mr. & Mrs. W. Tuthill 8 to Cathy Wheatley Letter received 1/11/94 from Larry Westerman 9 to CI T hest Land Use Subcommittee and Tigard city council Letter received 1/13/94 from Petitioners (con- 10 cerned citizens of Castle Hill and surrounding area) to Ladies and Gentlemen of Council Letter dated 1/11/94 from Carleen Pagni of 11 Wintrowd Planning Services to City-Recorder Package of Material from Preston, Thorgrimson, 12 Shidler, Gates & Ellis - Supplemental Memorandum Package of Material from .'john W. Shonkwiler - 13 Applicant's Additional Testimony and Evidence Letter dated 1/14/94 from Garry P. McMurry 14 to Dick Bewersdorff Letter dated 1/14/94 from Kimberly Know, Project 15 Coordinator of Tri-Met Transit Development Agar& Department to Victor Adonri A Hrnrrh f'IC~CIVCLi JAN 141994 January 14, 1994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tigard City Council w 0 ~ 0 G..a JW Y~YY~ vvaw. Tigard, OR. 97223 Bear Councilmen, This letter is intended to voice the concerns of the residence of the Cotswold Meadows subdivision in Northwest Tigard, regarding the prospects for rezoning the property at Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. We believe the zoning change would have severe consequences that would adversely impact the livability of our neighborhood. Should Wilton llvenue be allowed to merge with Walnut Street as planned, traffic patterns and frequency will be negatively altered in a way not designed for under the current zone _ designation. Unlike homes or apartments, a large supermar ket and accompanying shops. will act as an enormous lure to the surrounding population. R bulb of that population is iocated East of 135th Rvenue. Those residence, extending nearly to Mary Woodward School, utilize Morning Hill Drive to access 1 35th. It is obvious that a driver at the intersection of Morning Hill 1lriue and 135th Ruenu e, enroute to the proposed shopping center, would seek the easiest and most direct route. That route would be to continue across 135th and down Morning Hill Drive thus eliminating the need to merge with traffic, and on to Wilton Rvenue. This traffic pattern change will mean numerous more cars on streets i7atintended for that purpose. Traffic increases equate into more noise, more pollution and more probability of a child's severe injury. Too, it would modify something that is considered an intangible; our "sense of place." 1 , ~►L T60 1I5 r ;e i If Wilton Ruenue does not intersect Walnut Street, cars would instead haue to turn onto 135th and then down Wainui Sircet to reach the shopping complex. These are the streets that were intended to handle the traffic uolume. Speed bumps„or "intersection islands" are nuisances and hamper emergency responders and are not considered alternatiues. Respite the dynamic nature of our society and rapidity of our area's growth, homeowners haue the right to eupect a continued leuel of liuabilitg and safety when they commit to spending their Hues in a residential neighborhood. This proposed zone change, coupled with the eHtension of our street, are contrary to those basic eupectations. Please see the enclosed petition that dramatically indicates our neighborhood's total support toward this condition before accepting a change in the zone designation. Respectfully submitted, Aft Glenn W. Geiger 12q 14r SW Wilton Rue. Tigard, OR. 97223 2 a 16 volt g~~~,~p,Tpg~' rope r~►~ ttle cog,)7TI®~ OF he reZOnia! ram COO -on 01 T® apls~sed to t79 to t~' ed e!lte►►se ould undersigned mberts!~uaboli ei09 ttoe he zone Yc Sabo h Iuit Id Ckc the candili®stlo►ut ctreet• and patternsof stores sue, tl(nown Wititoul enue to 1V `leac [he. caml►1er° Of t~~th hV s the traffic trea. ast o ease dDiltan Ao alter Hill tlr►°e' opuIOUs sar9 deer adoarselt d moraln9 eutensioe ps unneces n at ris~- tro~ a venue childre Flueou rain traffic ®l Wilton ~ood9 and puts our y2 , ss d the eal.ens~ the nei,ahiia liouhillt~9 a t~l ~,cles ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ 7 yz3 t4agne 1 j `AY L t t "'C9 (N 1e ~ Q~ y7yz.3 5e 1-I5•-97LL3 !r _ ~l7L z3 17. 6 wt L. q rx 992 3 i ti pr. Ta~~p 9> 014 ;a. z9. 30 17 "=M6rM9ro% TO ADD A CONDITION OF ACCEPT CE FOR REZONING The undersigned are opposed to t he 'rez onin g of the p rope rtg known as, the 11w1nertson~s c:$oyp tw a•vsrrsrrvJlr►dd~' L.iJ/lJJJl1E`frr I~dP without the condition of abolishing the planned entension of Wilton Huenue to walnut Street. The zone change would aduerselg alter traffic frequency and patterns on both W`ton Huenue and Morning Hill Driue. The complen of stores would draw traffic from the entensiue populous East of 135th 1luenue. The eHtension of Wilton Huenue is unnecessary, decreases the Iluabilitg of the neighborhood, and puts our children at risk. Name Rddreas .31, A _ 12 56J 64 s- i g of 33 / . 1-7,0417 SW aw „To.y Avg -ricg2 - . .u 13~i ?4 ~JW C9 t5 37s i 39 i c. -5W C4 4- G- I. I' L. I f f 1 e 5S(Al Cyt~fi L 7-aG,+r~ -dK n .J15f t 7 q oS eC✓ l'/Z~~?' C~ /G~ t3 ~Q6 1 S •!ti W I 1 Te,J AUr T, , A A J20`~3 S1iU U'd LTV-1j fi:~J T1Cz0W4) s2. QYA 1:5W hiUd& S3 onuj 13d9i fw r . " A d~ ss~s~ S c~ l►J~.S?~i u QV~ , .54, MktA _ S 57• 1a.ZlS S ly (itZD,F.3uQ~a t .P.P e-- y • F,7- o~ a &a& a i 46 Aga TO ADD A CONDITION OF ACCEPTANCE FOR REZONING The ~u~ndersigned pare opposed to the rezoning of the property ~llllssoiie'vJ kAw=Jn as g 1.he i6Ribei-ison}s Site" to F''1D'/llllil/fff" . without the condition of abolishing the planned eH tens ion of Wilton fluenue to Walnut Street. The zone change would aduersely alter traffic frequency and patterns on both Wilton flue nue and Morning Hill Bri ue. The c ompl ew of stores would draw traffic from the entensiue populous. East of 135th fluenue. The eHtension of Wilton fluenue is unnecessary, decreases the liuabillty of the neighborhood, and puts our children at risk. Name Nddress fol. ~7UU 1 Iwlc( alli , ~LQL . &Z. ~3. f s s uJ . tv-~-s ~ ►c v. :evr r~c, a S w Boom Gs. 46, 1 ~Q SIrJ (o7. ~r ,S y CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF OREGON 14355 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. Beaverton OR 97007 RECEIVED PLANNING 503-579-2770 JAN 18 1994 Richard Brewersdorf Current Planning Commission City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223. -7 Dear Sir, We would like to bring to your attention that we are a school located just across Scholls Ferry Road from the Albertsons Project on Scholls. In principle we are not opposed to such a development, we feel that we can be good neighbors. However, there are several safety factors which your office should take into consideration. Please find enclosed a letter from Mr. Strauss, an architect, who on our behalf has written up some recommendations. Sincerely, Rabbi Wilhelm, Director i. A f bye--rso m 15 A o ~ 5TEWAKT GOKDON STKAUS ARCHITECT5 • CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT5 January 11, 1994 Chabad Lubavitch of Oregon 14355 SW Scholls Ferry Road Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Alan: Rabbi Moishe Wilhelm Dear Rabbi Wilhelm, At your request, I have given consideration to the impact of a major commercial development across Scholls Ferry Road from the Chabad Center, which serves as the home of your Aleph Bet School in addition to other community activities. While I have not had the opportunity to review the specific plans proposed by the developer, it is apparent that there are several safety related issues you should focus on in the development review process. However, if these can be satisfactorily resolved, there is no reason to believe that this development cannot be a good neighbor bringing significant benefits to the area. 1. School warning signage: at the present time, there is no signage in the public right of way that alerts motorists to the fact that there may be children present; it would be reasonable to request a condition of approval be the developer's provision of "20 MPH speed limit when children present" signage at a reasonable distance east and west of the Chabad property, since this development will surely worsen the problem by generating a greater volume of traffic. 2. Left turn lanes: Scholls Ferry should be upgraded to provide a minimum of one traffic lane in each direction plus a third center lane for left turns for both east and west bound traffic; without such provision, left turns into either the commercial development or into the Chabad Center will cause significant delays and back-up, which would constitute an increased hazard for the school children. 3. Alignment of driveways: it would appear that the easterly entry driveway near the Sherris restaurant is approximately in alignment with the current driveway into the Chabad Center; it would be most desirable if these did align exactly to avoid any confusion that might otherwise face drivers exiting each side as to right of way. 4. Lighting: it is likely that the development will have some lighting in the general area of the easterly entry drive; it would be advantageous if that lighting could be placed as close to the entry and street as possible to provide illumination for Chabad entry as well; this will improve visibility for all motorists in this area. These are the most critical issues. Based on my eight years experience on the Beaverton Board of Design Review dealing with very similar matters, I believe that all of them should be accommodated by the developer aria supported by the City of Tigard Staff in the interest of public safety. Please let me know if there are any other matters I can help with. Sincerely, Stewart Gordon Straus, Principal Ask, Member of the American Inf.+titute of Architects and'the Construction Specification Institute 1532 5. W. JEFFERSON STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 , (503) 224-7510 FAX: (503) 224-7208 JA I- 1 J -C;14 Tus M. W i 1 he I m FAX !SOS 244Z5430 P. 01 • L q STEWART GORDON STRAUS ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS January 11, 1994 Chabad Lubavitch of Oregon 14355 SW Scholls Ferry Road Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Attn: Rabbi Molshe Wilhelm Dear Rabbi Wilhelm, At your request, I have given consideration to the impact of a major commercial development across Schoils Ferry Roaq. from the Chabad Center, which serves as the home of your Aleph Bet School in addition to other community activities. While i have not had the opportunity to review the specific plans proposed by the developer, it is apparent that there are several safety related issues you should focus on in the development review process. However, if these can be satisfactorily resolved, there is no reason to I:,e-lieve that this development cannot be a good neighbor bringing significant benefits to the area. 1. School warning signage: at the present time, there Is no signage in the public right of way that alerts motorists to the fact that there may be children present; it would be reasonable to request a condition of approval be the developer's provision of '20 MPH speed limit when children present` signage at a reasonable distance east and west of the Chabad property, since this development will surely worsen the problem by generating a greater volume of traffic. 2. Left turn lanes: Scholis Ferry should be upgraded to provide a minimum of one traffic lane in each direction plus a third center lane for left turns for both east and west bound traffic; without such provision, left turns into either the commercial development or into the Chabad Center will cause significant delays and back-up, which would constitute an increased hazard for the school children. 3. Alignment of driveways: it vould appear that the easterly entry driveway near the Sherris restaurant is approximately in alignment with the current driveway Into the Chabad Center; it would be most desirable it these did align exactly to avoid any confusion that might otherwise face drivers exiting each side as to right of way. 4. Lighting: it is likely that the development will have some lighting in the general area of the easterly entry drive; it would be advantageous if that lighting could be placed as close to the entry and street as possible to provide illumination for Chabad entry % as well; this will improve visibility for all motorists in this area. - . . _ These are the most critical issues. Based on my eight years experience on the Beaverton Board of Design Review dealing with very similar matters, I believe that all of them should be accommodated by the developer and supported by the City of Tigard Staff In the interest of public safety. Please let me know if there are any other matters I can help with. Sincerely, Stewart Gordon Straus, Principal oirnri cr of the American institute of Architects and the Construction Specification Inotitute 7 .532 S. W. JEFFERSON STREET FOMANP. ORi^W4 97201 (503) 224-7510 FAX (503) 224-7208 Dom Virgilio Ask 14172 SW Chehalem Court Tigard, OR 97223 January 8, 1994 i ~ SAN 12 19~3~f .i - City of Tigard rr ,`aK , c% Tigard City Council 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLANAIfENDMENT/CPA 93-0009 ZONE CHANGE/ZON 93-0003 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIE6VISDR 93-0014 CONDITIONAL USE/CUP 93-002 MINOR LAND PARTITION/MLP 93-0013 ALBERTSON IDUAICOAlBE Dem- City Council Members: My name is Dom Virgilio and I own a home in the Castle Hill housing development within the City of Tigard. I am writing this letter to formally express my opinions regarding the foliowing'proposed actions: CPA 93-0009, ZON 93-0003, SDR 93-0014, CUP 93-0002, and MLP 93-0013, the city notification process, and the City Planning Commission's modifications to the original Albertson's proposal. It is also my intent io provide oral testimony at the public hearing on January 25, 1994 at the Tigard City Hall, if, such testimony would prove helpful. I would first like to make mention of the fact that I have participated in all of the public hearings, citizen involvement team meetings, and, land use meetings that have devoted time to the above- mentioned, proposed actions. In addition, I have spoken with a city engineer, the developer, and, my neighbors, as well as having reviewed all of the pertinent information at City Hall. Although I am new to the process, I assure you that I have quickly become familiar with the issues at hand, the appropriate procedures, and the ramifications of the proposed actions. I feel more than competent to express my opinions on this matter. I am an engineer by trade and I have attacked this problem with the same intensity that I do my work. My arousing investment and peace of mind are at stake, and I intend to do everything in my power to protect my interests. Although my home is on Chehalem Court, my backyard borders on Northview Road. In fact, my kitchen, family room, and bedroom windows all overlook the proposed Albertson's parking lot site. The Albertson's proposed actions would directly affect the noise level, the traffic, the security, and, in my particular case, even the view from my home. This is not why I am writing this letter. I am writing this letter because I am disgusted with the process. The process is faulty and something needs to be done about it. First, some background. I began looking for a house in May of 1993. When I came across the Castle Hill development, I noticed a sign on the lot between Scholls Ferry Road and Northview Road: "This site under consideration for Small Community Grocery and Specialty Shops." Before I began the loan approval process, I spoke with my Realtor. I was informed that; "this was probably a small, Mom and Pop shop with a florist, or small boutique. It will be close; to Scholls with no access from Northview." I then called the City. I was told that, "it is kind of difficult to say what will be there because there is some pending discussion over the final zoning for that particular plot of land. It could be apartment houses or a community grocery store." LB~~ts~Ns ~ A "Fine", I said; I decided to contact the name that appeared on the site sign. But, the sign was missing. Adak And, I waited... and waited... Finally, I decided to proceed with the loan approval process; in my mind, the sign was taken down because the developer decided that this site was not appropriate for a "small com-r unity grocery with specialty shops". I could not contact the developer because the sign was gone. Several weeks later, I was out visiting whai was io be my new home, anxiously awaiting my loan to be finalized, when I noticed two men on the lot across the street. I walked over, introduced inysel.`, and exchanged business cards with the developer. He was there placing a new sign; apparently, the last sign had been stolen. I received a phone call several days later from that same developer, as promised. He explained that a large Albertson's proposal was in the process of being reviewed by the City Planning Commission. He was shocked that my Realtor and Builder had not informed me pf the pending action. Apparently, the present policy in the City of Tigard does not require "potential" home owners to be notified of pending actions for nearby property. The present policy relies on the developer and Realtor to represent the facts without requiring prospective buyers to verify that they are aware of the issues at hand. I did everything within my power as a consumer and prospective buyer, yet, in this instance, the process failed me., The process failed me and it failed my neighbors, many of whom never even saw the sign. I would suggest that the City Council review the present notification policy and require that prospective home buyers return a signed statement to the City stating that the pending actions nearest the home have been reviewed and are understood. Had the notification policy been such, the Castle Hill community would have been better informed, participated more positively in the process, and would be more eager to coop rate with the Albertson's planning staff this late in the process. Please note that I did not even receive notice of the Planning Commission meeting to discuss this issue because the mailing list that the city used was out of date and did not include the Castle Hill community. Tins i,-►furiates . Next, I would like to discuss my speck thoughts on the proposed actions. I do not object to a "smalls-omnwnity grocery with specialty shops". A huge Albertson's is certainly not a small community grocery. In fact, T shop at Murray Hill or at the Howard's on Scholls - both a few minutes -way by car, and, ironically, they are almost never crowded - making me wonder if there is a need for this shopping center at all. I grew up on Long Island, New York in a pleasant little town where I used to swim in the lake and catch guppies in the summer. I watched strip mall after strip mall crowd the streets and highways - each one replacing some wooded area until once small communities resembled big cities. I moved to Oregon 5 years ago to escape to an area where trees flourished, traffic was easy going, and, in the evening, you could still hear the animals and bugs in the brush and woods. I am now faced with living 100 feet from a multi-acre parking lot, increased traffic, and, a huge strip mall in my backyard. A strip mall that is slated to be operated 24-hours a day. At one point, there was even discussion of a gas station on the site. Insane. It is amazing how a "small community grocery with specialty shops" can cause a small community such as Castle Hill such grief. Folks are considering selling their houses. Some are talking about suing. I just want to understand how this could happen - and, especially, with such disregard for the community that the site was intended to serve. The proposal needs to be restructured such that it is more in the spirit of Neighborhood Commercial. And, the community of Castle Hill needs to be considered in full - not as an afterthought. Finally, I would like to discuss my specific objections with the Planning Commission's modifications to the Albertson's proposal. The introduction of the Northview Road access to the proposed Albertson's site was, as I understand it, suggested by the Planning Commission to "better integrate the site with the community". What it will do, instead, is introduce additional noise in our living rooms, keep us awake at night with headlights flashing in our bedroom windows, and constantly remind us of the fact that this proposed, 24-hour site is far from a "small community grocery store". 9 . The proposed Northvicw access road will be graded at such an inclination as to cause headlights to flash DIRECTLY into my bedroom window at night. I know of no other way to convey my opinion on this matter then by such a statement as this - IF THE NORTHVIEW ACCESS ROAD ENTRANCE IS ALLOWED, I WILL IMMEDIATELY SELL MY HOME, r zpp,-e.,-fa Lhp, n porlnnity to present •my opinions to the Council. I also understand the difficulties that you face in this matter. I encourage you to review the notification process and amend A. I encourage you to adhere to the spirit of Neighborhood Commercial and scale down the Albertson's proposal to a plan that is more like the intended, "small community grocery with specialty shops". And; I encourage you to retract your recommendation to provide a Norihview Road access to the proposed site. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 1 Dom Virgilio Ask /D JANUARY ii, 14 CATHY WHEATLEY D ITY OF -T.I GARD 13125 SW. HALL BL' .7 T I GARD, OR 97223 DEAR CATHY,WHEATLEY, I 00ULD LIKE TO E'XP'RESS MY TOTAL DISAPPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ALBERTSON'S "ON'SC:HOLLS FERRY AND.WALNUT. I FEEL THAT SITE IS TOTALLY UNSUITED FOR A RETAIL COMPLEX OF THIS SIZE. NEITHER SCHOLLS FERRY, .NOR WALNUT IS LARGE FNOU13H' .TO HANDLE THE AMOUNT.' OF TRAFFIC THAT A COMPLEX OF THIS SIZE WOLJL D GENERATE.; THE ALBERTSON' S AT DURHAM AND PACIFIC GENERATES CONSIDERABLE TRAFFIC,,` AND THOSE TWO LARGE STREETS ARE FAR, BETTER SUITED TO HANDLE IT. "MY HOME IS LOCATED NEAR 121ST AND WALNUT, AND k::NOW I NG THAT IT IS ONLY A MATTEF:.OF'` TIME BEFORE WALNUT IS. MADE A THRU STREET TO SCHOLLS FERRY, I CAN 'JUST-' IMAGING THE,MASSES . OF TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE USING WALNUT AS A SHORTCUT THr,U, TIGARD.. AN AL:BERTSON' S ON THAT SITE WOULD ONLY ADD TO THAT.. THE LOT .AT, ,135TH. AND SC:HOLLS FERRY WOULD BE A FAR BETTER SITE FOR A COMPLEX OF T'H I S SIZE, AS -THAT. PART OF, SC:HOLLS FERRY IS MUCH LARGER, AND BETTER ABLE TO HANDLE,ALL OF.THE TRAFFIC:. I ALSO FEEL THAT HOWARD'S (WHICH I USE) AND Tub:? I FTl jAY ARE MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO SERVICE THE NEEDS 'OF 'THIS AREA. MPAVE, ALSO .WATCHED THE TELEVISED COUNCIL MEETINGS REGARDING THIS DEVELOPMENT', AhID WA3 TOTALLY SHOCKED TO HEAT: THE C:OUNC:IL. MEMBERS SAY THAT THEY HAVE NOT, NOR DO THEY NEED,. TO VIOIT..THE SITE IN ORDER THE MAKE AN INFORMED VOTE. IF°THE;COUNC.IL MEMBERS WOULD ONLY VISIT THE SITE IT WOULD BECOME QUITE bBVIOuS TO 'THEM THAT IT IS NOT SUITABLE, AND THE NEARBY RESIDENTS HAVE JUST CAUSE :FOR . ALAf'M.; THE C:OUNC:I L MUST REMAIN RESPONSIVE THE THE WANTS AND NEEDS .OF THE.COMMUNITY.' AS A CONCERNED VOTER, I WILL BE WATCHING HOW EAi'H COUNCIL MEMBER ADDRESSES THIS ISSUE. YOURS TRULY, MARY BONSER 1215 SW ANN P'L. TIGARD, OR 97223 JAN 12 AML Y:r 41 be R r:50 N5 sf 1994 C& -YL u ~ i on, h ywa W, 5 ~9 STS mo ti~~t 5 b ~ December'301993 Ms. Cathy Wheatley City Recorder Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall, Blvd. I'm writing regarding the proposal to rezone land for a shopping center at Scholis Ferry and Walnut. In my opinion, we do not need another major shopping center when there are already two nearby (Greenway and Murrayhill). I'm concerned that this plan would result in additional traffic and commercialization of a primarily residential area. Specifically, we've already seen evidence of gang activity in the city park just north and west of Summerlake. I believe that a major strip mall would invite more such activity. While I recognize that there may be substantial tax-base advantages to the city, what we need as residents is a gas station and a scattering of mom & pop grocery stores within walking distance of our neighborhoods, not a major shopping center. Thank you for your en John C. Roberts _ 11847 SW 125th Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 524-4197 JAN 11 1994 STSnloN 4 LRE~.tso CIS ~ t~ , A IDEC 1 G -1993 T®: 1?113/03 Tigard City Council Town Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. From: Aaron Cathy G weu 14161 S.W. Stardust Lena Tigard, Or. 97223 a+a: Proposed (Alb's) zme cage on the corner. of Scholls Ferry & Walnut. We live a block away fi+ona the MwIla Ferry and Walnut intersection, where it major zone change has been applied foe>i. We am unable to attend dk-- heating on December 14, regarding this situation, but we want to expss how much we do not want a shopping center a block fian our home. We just purchased our new home two months ago and we are very dish=sed that this might heppm. This is a new quret residential neighbediaod with man hmilies that have small cfWdaen. Many of the homeowners are first time bm-yas arid arra very proud of dir new hors. WQ moved here because it was diet and swap ft-cm, the city. T hwe are already two grocery and video atoms within a mile of this area and these isn't a awd fbr my nwm. Wo will do unydsh* roan ram to ntvp thm fivM w ring. I I Lc ~Vt/ G~~r (,yr~~ D G 53tZ9CIedy Yaaaas, r, I IV n- 15 D E C c., Amm C. Green ~,~993 C~t Cathy E. Grew 61 • pia s scN l-(~t « ~ rn~~~ y ' ,.,Q t rsodvs '7 l4 ~I~ i►_ i~ ~~i~L_~i~Ii l ~sj 41 411' 11 00 o s0 :j Mimi Land Use Subcommittee Tigard CIT West 10 January 1994 Tigard City Council n'or 13125 SW Hall Blvd. T: 972 a. it y A o _ ,.rr ~I JAN 11 9594 To the members of the City Council: ty uUML,~ Re: Albertson's Inc./Duncombe CPA 93-0009 / ZON 93-0003 / SDR 93-0014 / CUP 93-0002 / MLP 93-0013 On 3 January 1994, the members of the Land Use Subcommittee of CIT West met with Mr. John Shonkwiler, a representative of the applicant in the above referenced action, and with Mr. Richard Bewersdorf of the city staff. Following a presentation by Mr: Shonkwiler, a number of substantial questions and concerns about this application were expressed by those present, and a discussion was held by all attendees on the merits of the application. As a result of this discussion, a number of specific recommendations were agreed upon by general consent of those present. On 4 January 1994, a report on the subcommittee meeting was presented to the regular meeting of CIT West, and a discussion was held by the attendees. Again, it was agreed, by vote, to present to the City Council a number of specific recommendations and concerns about this proposal. These fall into two general categories, which I will detail below. First: it was the consensus of the group that the application be denied, on the following specific grounds: -The explicit intent of the Community Commercial zone designation is to promote the cre- ation of small neighborhood-oriented business centers, with a market area radius of not more than 1.5 miles. The requested 40,000 square foot store, the 8 acre automobile-oriented shopping center, and the over-sized video store are out of proportion with the needs of the neighborhood, and are clearly designed to attract a substantial portion of their client-,le from outside the one and one-half mile radius of service designated in the code. The orientation of the store towards traffic flow along Scholls Ferry Road, and the general strip-mall nature of the design are, we feel, indicative of this approach to the broader potential market area. So too is the request for 24-hour operation, which is not well suited for the iar,ely rural or semiurban nature of the immediately surrounding development. -We are especially concerned that the extension of Walnut Street from 135th to Scholls Ferry Road has not been constructed, and that there is not "intersection" involving a major collec- tor and an arterial street, as required by the locational criteria for the Community Commer- cial District. Before any new commercial zoning is approved at this location, there needs to be a real, not a planned, intersection involving a major collector (Walnut) and an arterial (Scholls Ferry). -This application is the first for a Community Commercial zone, and as such will set a signifi- cant precedent for future applications and approvals. Therefore, we feel very strongly that the explicit language of the zone, to foster the development of neighborhood centers of , A l bgkvsbris Q 16 ~MM -an commerce which enhance the liveability of the impacted service area, must be strongly applied in this case. Inasmuch as the current application does not meet this clear criterion, we feel it should be rejected. Second: in the event that a modified version of the application is approved, we strongly rPno^:- muna severai specific exceptions and alterations to the existing proposal. -We recommend denial of the conditional use permit for a gas station on the site, owing to - concerns for health and fire safety in this residential area, and to reduce the potential traffic impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. -We recommend that no access road be required or permitted to the residential street to the east of the site (SW Northview.) The traffic studies indicate that very few neighborhood cars would utilize this access road. Any "traffic using the exit ramp at night would shine lights onto the immediately adjacent residences, producing an unnecessary disruption for these homes. Furthermore, one intent of the Community Commercial zoning code is to encourage pedestrian and bicycle traffic to the site, which is contrary to any assertion that a street access is needed for homes immediately adjacent to, and within a few hundred yards of, the store site. Traffic from more distant homes will be adequately served by the proposed entrance from SW Walnut. •We recommend no exception to the standard hours of operation for any business element in the project, since such exception will not enhance the service to the immediately surround- ing neighborhood. The service area of this site will be entirely residential property, with no late-night business or social establishments, so that overnight operation is not justified. -We recommend a significant reduction in the maximum grocery store size at this site. The immediate service area is currently served by a full-sizod Th--iN vay store in the Murrayhill development, and by the smaller but still substantial Howard's Market at SW 121st. If the current pattern of low-density residential development continues in the immediate area of the proposed site, there will not be enough residents within a one and one-half mile radius to sustain a store of the proposed size, and the merchant will be forced to provide incentives to draw additional customers from outside the immediate service area, which would result in a violation of both the spirit and the specific provisions of the Community Commercial zone designation. Some members of the CIT stated their opinion that a reduction in the allowed size of a grocery market to a maximum of 15,000 square feet is appropriate at this site. -We recommend a significant reduction in the maximum site size and a reduction in the size of the video store for the same reasons. Reducing the size of the grocery store and video store will reduce the expected vehicular tra c, perarimng a sng^.:.ncan*?y smaller parking lot. -We request that prior to approval, the applicant provide additional detail regarding landscap- ing, signage, noise, traffic, lighting, and disraption by truck access on and around the site. We are especially concerned whether the site development review (Tigard Community Development Code, Section 18.120) standards of the code are meet in this application. Since the applicant has not presented detailed engineering plans for these design elements, we cannot determine a priori whether these elements of the development will be appropri- ate and adequate to meet the needs of the site and the development code, while providing sufficient protection for the neighbors of the site from significant disruption from the com- mercial activity. -We request that adequate provision be made in the approval of the zone change, and in subse- r'? quent actions by the Planning Commission, City Council, and city staff, to ensure strict adherence to the ordinances regarding the impacts listed in the previous paragraph. Since the Community Commercial zone is new, no enforcement history exists on these mattes, and n4tentta5 .,,,,l tters i;il ; c, are- will sigmncantly magnify the adverse affect of this development on adjacent residential property. Thank you very much for your attention in this matter. We are grateful for this opportunity to pro- vide citizen input to your decision-making process, and look forward to continuing such interac- tions in the future. We also wish to thank you for providing us with the services of the various members of the city staff who have participated in these meetings and discussions. Mr. Shonkwiler and the other representatives of the Albertson's development team have been very cooperative during this lengthy process, and we appreciate the spirit and nature of their efforts at reaching an acceptable compromise in this commercial development. On behalf of the members of CIT West, and representing the Land Use Subcommittee: Larry Westerman i RECEIVED PLANNING Ladies and Gentlome^ cf t e Couiecil, JAN 13 1994 This letter is written by and on behalf of the concerned citizens of Castle Hill and the surrounding area. Based on the current proposal to develop this location under for rezoning the ifiC COmnniiurriiy cofiii"i"i@rCla! CiiStriCt, we as', that AlbertrtSon'S prupGsal southeast and northeast quadrant of the intersection of S. W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. Walnut street be denied. Given time and the opportunity, we are corivinced'that we would be able to develop a plan under the community commercial guidelines which would meet the needs, desires and concerns of the vast majority of all interested parties. Albertson's current proposal should be denied for the following reasons: 1) The proposal fails to comply with the purpose and spirit of the community commercial district. TCDC 18.61.010 states in part that the purpose of this zoning district is to provide for the regular needs of the residents of nearby residential neighborhoods. The district has a "primary neighborhood orientation" rather than toward the traveling public. A commercial strip development pattern is prohibited under the purpose sections. 2) Albertson's proposal clearly attempts to create the prohibited strip development pattern. The proposed design has at its center a !arge parking lot obviously for the convenience of the traveling public. The automobile access points are from S.W. Scholls Ferry and S.W. Walnut, the major traffic thoroughfares. The proposal does not include direct access for Castle Hill, or the undeveloped residential area to the south, "the nearby residential neighborhoods". (Note: the current proposal raises so many concerns regarding light, noise and traffic, that an access from the neighborhood is undesirable.) The unsightly portions of the Albertson's 40,000 square foot food store, including loading docks, equipment, etc., face the south toward Castle Hill and the undeveloped residential section. The portion of the building which faces east, also I bt~eTor~ts !O toward Castle Hill, has no windows or doors. All doors in the Albertson's store face S.W. Scholls Ferry. The oriaintQ-tion of the buildings makes clear the orientation of the development, toward the traveling public, not the surrounding neighborhood as required by,the code. 3) A site development review that includes site, building and sign guidelines consistent with TCDC18.61.055 is required prior to approval under TCDC 18.61.020. One cannot reach the issue of consistency since no such site review pertaining to landscaping, building design for the three buildings (ether than the Albertson's store,) or signage has been submitted. The placement of lights in the parking lot, a particular concern to residents who live on or border S.W. Northview; likewise has not been addressed by Albertson's. 4) The community commercial district provides: "building and site design guidelines and mandatory site design standards intended to minimize site development impacts on surrounding residential neighborhoods and to promote pedestrian and bicyclist friendly development' TCDC 18.61.010. Albertson's has not only failed to comply with the spirit of this legislation but with the requirements. A strip mall with a few gratuitous pedestrian and bicycle lanes has been designed. There are no access sites for pedestrians or bicyclists from the undeveloped residential site to the south or from S. W. Stardust, the major residential area to the east. Further, there are no pedestrian paths through the very large parking lots separating the proposed chain restaurant from the food store or video store. This represents not only a violation of the code but a hazardous condition. We believe the Albertson's proposal fails to comply with the community emphasis of the community commercial designation. This legislation gives the opportunity for new direction and emphasis on the development of the future. The direction is away from ad the automobile-oriented fast serve, large and impersonal chain strip malls. The emphasis is on fostering community values and meeting community needs. Development, progress and expansion, regardless of the terminology, is a reality in today`s society. "9d do ^ct ooject :c deVelonment. we merelv request the opportunity to influence its direction. NAME ADDRESS le 123 Z Ski 3. w ! yl `(3 Q C. ASA L-1.4 5. /L/710 S LJ v 7. 2!v VJ ~.-r , 11 CY 8. Sdh 9. 5 Al, 16. C~- 11. ~ ~F Z 6 W W aYt e► s * `T~~~C 12. _ S~J 13. b ~l-J cJ lam. \1 V 14. lqlqq 5V 1 a1 i' 7 i " r S9~ -yc~76 17 J%r~L_I~~~ S~oj SLI1 Ot•S~nca Ic (Stu,' C[ 7 2zy x •c 19. 20. 21. D .S42- `22. JVA' - 1~"i 47 Z 23. 39 1- -7 ~QS tk ar r 24. ! 3 9 sit) ~9D -SSo 25. 0 26. 6g I ~ v , r.J 1,-) 930 27. 139~2L5~ `4,03 29. Q nn+c~ r yt Yj 5-,75- 7JU 30. at,firc /Z12-/v S 31. 32. / q30 5" l~~h ~~h Cap qp 33.~~D~ 34. G / W W y-+ •td • f '7--z 5y~ 135. ILL J 36. J b'W' Vi ~ IV 1 ; ~o ~~,v? c~; E1 `i 2 Z 3 • 39. C 7- a2 41. 42. 44. 1410 4- Sw l.Idl-h 46. ' I I' ~►fl~ el. \An kN I tE~ ~ ~ I V CS~\~ \ QL1 `l Q7 47. Th~~,G.5~n1cs-~ar 1'a~8 =~W L:c~a,n b~ `'~:ga~ca 48. ,yam 49. - t la a 52. 53. 54. I ED PIANNING 17RECE 4 N 13 199 We, tt Aak We, 06 unsigned homeQuar~Qls of tF~e1Castle I) Subdivision anc~ surrounding area stfongly oppose the Alberlson's, Inc. Oroppsal to change tiipg zoning of• theSois'ttTeast and rtheast quagrdrgt oche Intersection of S. W. 9choUs Ferry Ro;4 and S.Wt Walnut StYee$- from.fnulfif i6mily*to coghmercial. We considor aRy such change. to be a significant interference with the us"nd enjoyment of o"Gr property as WACas a detriment {o our commurIVI . NAB ADDOESS 77 2.► l ► ~l Z3 g U~ n_~Sm~r,. C 11 77 S-4 x- 4. J~v,,J TV- -~'-w C-,=" - r 6. ; IUI s• LA)fl7 aE l n C rm 9X lC-aA-r-A qrI ZZ3 h 10. v 6-evl /Z,A87 :st,1 7f&- ~ afc., 47u3 FAM 11.~t~~Ila1 1 . ~N1~7 ~~10~ SCE) ~C7fVips ~r _ dtr n✓ ~~ZZ3 `I2.--~eh~-, Ge~~~r t ~?.g~~( St~J 1~~. /ode. .s dr~ `)>zt J 4li k&Z?- ~ MAAv- I2:55C-1Z AMM CA- -ref 14. o A - .`t I13 G S, u, c, t/ ! =c~- 9 -1 z z 3 J , 71 ll q C 1 1- - ' AA//J ,1 .tfinf,/".. J itr+ 16. '11,41 j 13g 17. 18. 1 19. ~4-nnr~..~ ~.39 ri' 7 cSQ 71' C~ &OL AD d e, 20. 3t ~i° 6r¢,2 21.V Moo -4w, (j, 22. r o ~ ~r ~ cr- OR FPO Iva 23. 74?-- CT 7/4y 25. 26. A604 El Z2~- f M w 4.4 n L / !il (,o lr 77 Z Z-3 . S 4S L 27 28. 2 9. 30 1410 ~1c~ (~id.s2rt , 1 ~«I cJ2 q~Z23 31. 32. 33. ~5 l ~1L~ 34. ~ll~ v~ ~1 1 t a "1 S t.J 1N o V~ 2....+ ~y , z~co Cam. 'l AM 35. 2 1 L a ' e D;-- 71-3 tV *1 'n 35. A LAIWIPS 38. r ' S 39. w / 4V. 41. 42. - 43. 44. 45. - 46. - J (o MINE WP 1n11n1'r1Tnt%IAIF% r„ L` VV#IVIGnVVVL/ rLHlV1wIVGi zitKW/(LU January 11, 1994 JAN 12 1994 City Recorder " - J U LJ City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Albertsons' Consolidated Land Use Application CPA 93-0009 / ZCA 93-0003 / CUP 93-0002 / SIDR 93-0014 Dear City Recorder: Please include the enclosed resume for Gregory Winterowd in the record of this matter. Thank you. Very truly yours, AMk ~~U v Carleen Pagni " j Esr~mo~l y Land Use and Resource Planning • Growth Management - Site Development Suite 210, 'Office Courts Building • 700 North Hayden Island Drive • Portland, OR 97217 TeL• (503) 735-0853 Fax: (503) 289-7656 a~ PS W/IV7-1?01A1w oI,A, tliviivv JcPVIC.'CS GREGORY WINTERO'WD LAND USE PLANNER C.^.UC:,;,4,;; SELECTED EXPERIENCE Master of Urban and Regional Planning, ! • Ci!~y of Hillsboro (1991-93) University of Oregon (1981) Goal 5 ESEE analysis and natural resources study, examining environmental, Master of Political Studies, Queen's University, economic, social and energy impacts of probable development affecting 50 natural Canada (1972) resource sites, and recommending solutions. Planning Work Program Ouiline and Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota (1970) Specifications, recommended detailed work program for integrating long-range Exchange Student Manchester University, U.K. planning and zoning administrative functions, consistent with local goals and state requirements. Currently under contract with the City to develop a program to PROFEStiIONAL AFFiUATiONS achieve the purposes of Statewide Planning Goal 5, including development of natural resource management policies and implementing regulations. American Planning Association Past Board Member and Legislative Chair Clackamas County, Oregon (1992-93) Oregon APA Chapter Welland resource study, examining environmental, economic, social and energy Oregon City Planning Directors' Association impacts of probable development affecting 250 wetland resource sites in urban Past President Vice President areas, and recommending solutions. Developed workable and detailed Goal 5 and Legislative Chair meiPodology based recent case law and Clackamas County planning program. Generic ESEE analysis completed; site specific analysis currently being done. °DDFESVOINAL 0CFERMIkE City of Fairview, Oregon (1992) Fairview Drainage Master Plan, including an analysis of land use problems and Land Use Planning Consultant (1990-present) solutions related to drainage management. Planning Director, City of Springfield Oregon (1983-1989) State Farm Mutual Insurance Corporation, Inc., Hillsboro, Oregon (1991-92) Plan Reviewer and Field Representative, Preparation of land use report and findings for AmberGlen Business Park, a 217- 40 of Land Conservation and acre (1.3 million square foot) project which included wetland, stream condor and Development (1979-1983) upland natural resource mitigation. Associate Planner, City of Ashland, Oregon (1977-78) City of Ridgefield, Washington (1992-93) Market Analysis, Pederson & Associates (1976) Growth management planner for the City including working with the Planning Newsletter Editor. Oregon State Housing Commission and City Council, conducting citizen involvement meetings, Division (1975 Legislative Session) presentations to various government agencies. Writing the City's comprehensive HUD Fellowship Intern: Lane Council of plan including-long-range natural resource management and public facilities Governments planning , AREAS OF EXPERTISE Hecate Water District, Florence, Oregon (1991-92) Clear Lake Watershed Land Use Study • Local, regional and state planning and Analysis of potential land use impacts based on existing plan designations and regulatory systems zoning. Review of management practices to minimize non-point source pollution. • Managing and conducting urban planning and Developed draft regulations for district and county consideration. Participated in natural resource studies mediation sessions designed to reach consensus regarding management options. • Assisting government agencies, neighborhood Coordinated with DEQ and DLCD regarding state planning requirements and associations and developers in meeting and standards. responding to local, state and federal regulatory and planning requirements City of Springfield (1983-1989) • Legal issues related to planning and zoning in Regularly made public presentations and facilitated citizens' ,groups, planning Oregon commissions, special tasks forces and elected officials in goal-setting and in • Urban design and historic preservation reaching consensus on controversial issues. Prepared the City's Development Code, and Hillside Development and Urban Forestry Ordinances, including findings AREAS OF SPECOAiJZATION demonstrating compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals. Participated in the metropolitan natural resources study and regional wetlands management issues. • Growth management • Comprehensive planning and zoning Department of Land Conservation and Development (1979-83) • Oregon and Washington state planning Reviewed local comprehensive plans and sssisted local govemments in achieving programs compliance with Statewide Planning Goals. Goal 5 analyses "Now Land Use and Resourcq Planning • Growth Management • Site Development Suite 210, Office Courts Building'- 700 North Hayden Island Drive • Portland, OR 97217 Tel. (503) 735-0853 Fax: (503) 289-7656 II ~~c~u ~/~~rl~~ BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD ® II IN THE MATTER OF THE ) 2 APPLICATION OF ALBERTSON I S . 1 File 1Jr±- _ ^.°R 93-009, INC. FOR PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE ) ZON 93-003, SDR 93-0014, 3 CHANGE, SITE DEVELOPMENT ) CUP 93-002, and MLP 93-013 REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE ) 4 PERMITS, AND MINOR LAND ) SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM PARTITION APPROVALS. \ 5 6 Opponents Matt Marcott, Marcott Holdings, and Marcott 7 Thriftway, Inc. ("Marcott") will be brief in this supplemental 8 memorandum for several reasons: 9 1. Marcott has said most of what it has wanted to say in 10 I the materials originally presented to Council in December, to 11 which the applicant requested an opportunity to respond. 12 2. Marcott anticipa~es that the applicant will wait until 13 the last minute to file its response; requiring Marcott to 14 I request a continuance under ORS 197.763(4) to do so. 15 Nevertheless, there were issues raised at the December 14th 16 ! hearing which should be considered in this memorandum. Marcott 17 adopts and incorporates the issues raised by the other 18 !i opponents to this proposal by this reference. The remaining 19 issues are treated below. 20 REVIEW ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD 21 As the City AttoFney observed, there is a question as to the 22 nature of the record to be-considered in Council's review. 23 Tigard Municipal Code ("TMC") 18.32.090(C)(2)(c) does state 24 I that the council "hearing" is confined to the record made I 25 before the Planning Commission. However, both this subsection AIM 26 j and TMC 18.32.090(D)(4) both speak to a public "hearing" before I jl L/ PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GATES & ELLIS .i2?SdR (5 1 3200U.S. BANCORP TOWER 12 I11 S.W. F1F H AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 97204-3666 N I) TELEMONE.- (303) 226.3200 I the Council`, as does the notice of the proceedings before 1 Council in this case. his means that issues which may not 2 have been raised before the Planning Commission may be raised 3 du-i,ng Council hearings, as was done in this case. 4 Maarcott has also filed with the City Recorder its request 5 for post-acknowledgement notice under ORS 197.615(2), thus 6 preserving its rights to seek review of this decision before 7 LUBA.2 Because the City's notice does not meet the 8 requirements of ORS 197.763(3 )3, issues not raised before the 9 1 The Council Notice indicates that a public hearing is to 10 be conducted and that both oral and written testimony will be 11 received (see page 2, first paragraph). The Council Notice also contains the usual "raise it or waive it" requirements which 12 indicate that the Council will consider new issues, if raised. The Council Hearing Notice is attached as Exhibit "A." 13 "2 ORS 197.610(1) requires as follows: 14 * * * A proposal to amend a local government acknowledged 15 comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use regulation shall be forwarded to the director at least 45 days before the final hearing on adoRtion. } 15 * *IC 17 Marcott notes that notice given to the Director of the final 18 f hearing in this matter was scheduled for November 23, 1993, but was actually heard on November 17, 1993. The Notice of the Proposed Action in this matter is attached as Exhibit "B." 19 Moreover, the Planning commission does not have the power to 20 adopt such amendments; only Council has that power. The final hearing on this proposal has not yet occurred. The notice is 21 thus defective. Noncompliance with these provisions is substantive, rather than procedural. Oregon City Leasing v. 22 Columbia County, Or LUBA (LUBA No. 92-193, November 16, 23 1993) (on remand from Court of Appeals). 3The description of the re'quest in Exhibit "A" indicates 24 construction of a 53,950 square-foal. multiple use commercial retail building, as opposed to the 40,000 square-foot building 25 actually requested. The applicable approval criteria do not include state-wide Planning Goals 6, 13 and 14, and, at the 26 (continued...) 2 PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GATES & ELLIS 3200 U.S. BANCORP TOWER I I I S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 972043668 . TELEPHONE: (303) 228-3300 1 Planning Commission may be raised before LUBA. Neuenschwander 1 vv. Asiil«nd, 20 Or LUBA 144 (1990). 2 The applicant; cannot have it both ways. It may assert that 3 these proceedings are confined to the record. If so, the 4 Planning commission decision is highly vulnerable with respect 5 to the issues raised before Council, and others which may be 6 presented to LUBA, which would result in reversal or remand. 1 7 Alternatively, the applicant may request this matter to be 8 heard based on all the evidence presented, in which case the 9 applicant will likely not come close to meeting the approval 10 standards. Marcott will accommodate the applicant upon its 11 election. 12 UNRESOLVED APPLICATION ISSUES 13 The Community Commercial plan and zoning designations differ 14 from most other zones in that they require a complete package 15 of uses so that the effect of those uses may be assessed and 16 dealt with by the City upon consideration of the plan amendment 17 I and zone change applications. In section 4(b)(4) of the . 1 18 Community Commercial portion of the plan, it is said under 19 I "impact assessment": 20 ;'(a) The scale and intensity of the project shall be compatible with surrounding uses and 21 22 3(...continued) planning commission level, Chapter 18.162 of the Community 23 Development Code is not included; however, it is included at the Council level. At neither level are Tigard Comprehensive Plan 24 Policies 5.1.3, 5.1.5, 6.6.1, 8.2.1, 8.2.2, 8.4.1, 9.1.1, 9.1.2, 9.1.3, 11.1, 12.2, 12.2.1, and 12.2.2 included. Nor are Oregon 25 Administrative Rules 340-41-455(3)(e) (relating to the Tualatin Basin clean-up), nor OAR 660, Divisions 7, 9 and 12, included as 26 applicable criteria. 3 RESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GAPES & ELLIS 3200 U.S. BANCORP TOWER I I I S.W. FIFM AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 97206-3699 M.331 TELEPHONE: (507) 226.3200 consistent with the provis=cns of this plan. Such compatibility and consistency shall be 1 accomplished through the approval of a Site Development Review application contemporaneous 2 wits and a part of, the approval of a zone change the community co.mxneroia1 designation. 3 . The site plan approval may include 'condi ticins relating to site and building development 4 through conditions of approval of a zone change for the site. 5 11(b) It is generally preferable that a community 6 commercial site be developed as one unit with coordinated access, circulation, building design, signeIge, and landscaping. Parcels within a community commercial site, however, 8 may be developed independently although the City may require that developmental aspects of 9 individual parcels be coordinated through the development review process. 10 * * * 11 11(d) Access needs of individual parcels and uses 12 shall be coordinated within a site so ac to limit the number of access driveways to 13 adjacent streets. 14 15 I i) Exterior lighting, noise, and activities associated with the Community Commercial 16 district shall be controlled or mitigated so that they do not adversely affect adjacent 17 residential uses and comply with any applicable provisions of the Tigard Municipal 18 Code regulating noise, light, and nuisances. i Operating hour restrictions may be placed on 19 uses within the district, either through restrictions within the zoning district 20 regulations or through conditions of approval of a Plan map amendment for a particular 21 site." 22 The provisions of TMC ch. 113.61 also reflect the unitary 23 development approach of this designation. The purpose 24 provisions of 18.61.010 state that it is intended that a 25 community commercial center be ideally developed as a unit and 26 that compatibility with surrounding uses 4 PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHMLER GATES & ELLIS 3200 U.S. BANCORP TOWER I I I S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 91204.3699 TELEPHONE: (303) I29.32M "as determined through the review and approval of a Site 1 Development Review plan, including conformance with the site and building design standards contained in this 2 Section, contemporaneous with, and a part of, the approval of a zone change to the community commercial 3 designation. The site plan approval may include conditions relating to site and building development 4 through conditions of approval of a zone change for the site or through the Site Development Review process. 5 * This Chapter shall provide building and site design guidelines and mandatory site design standards 6 intended to minimize site development impacts on surrounding residential neighborhoods and to promote 7 pedestrian and bicyclist friendly development. 8 "It is preferable that a community commercial site be developed as one unit with coordinated access, 9 circulation, building design, signage, and landscaping. Parcels within a community commercial site, however, may 10 be developed independently although the City may require that developmental aspects of individual parcels be 1'1 coordinated through the development review process. Access needs of individual parcels and uses shall be 12 coordinated within a site so as to limit the number of access driveways to adjacent streets.is 13 Under TMC 18.61.020(C), Procedures and Approval Processes, ® 14 it is said: 15 ' "It is re Ured that a reauest to rezone a parcel with 16 the C-C zoning district be accompanied by a Site Development Review application and/or Conditional Use 17 application, depending upon the proposed usage of the site. The Site Development Review or Conditional Use 18 plan approval shall include review of the proposed development's consistency with the site, building, and 19 sign design guidelines and standards of Section 18.61.055. * * 20 TMC 18.61.055(A) and (B) deal respectively with design 21 guidelines which are "strongly encouraged" and may result in 22 multiple conditions, and design standards which are mandatory. 23 In each case, identification of the usL. is necessary to meet 24 the standards. 25 26 5 PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GATES & ELLIS e 3200 U.B. BANCORP TOWER 111 S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 97200.3688 3 TELEPHONE: (503) 228.3200 milli~illillililimi IBM a~ ® II in the instant case, the gas station has been,rejected by 1 1 the Planning Commission and the applicant has shown no desire 2 j to resurrect that application. Additionally; Mr. Winterowd 3 noted that the video store does not qualify for the 5,000 4 :^,-::i:".U- nonaral commercial ' sales store permitted and the 5 applicant's own testimony indicated that the specific uses have 6 not been agreed upon as yet. Design and compatibility 7 decisions cannot be made.without this information. 8 Moreover, the applicant has admitted that the noise and 9 i transportation studies necessary for compatibility and 10 conditions have yet to be made. Putting these decisions off 11 until another day, while approving part of the proposal (i.e., 12 fI the food store), is not permitted in this zone. 13 THE C01MERC IAL LANDS SWAP ® 14 The applicant requests that 6.97 acres of neighborhood 15 1 commercial land be.exchanged for 8 acres of coirmunity 16 ` commercial land, inferring that the 1.03 acre difference is 17 ` minuscule. Marcott requests the Council to take official I 18 I :notice of the relevant ordinances relating to this site, i.e., 19 CPA 18-83, AC 14-83, the 1985 and 1986 redesignations from CPA 20 V 4-85 and ZC 4-85 and CPA 1-86 and ZC 3-86, as well as the 1991 21 I amendments through CPA 91-0003 and ZCA 91-0006. 22 These documents will demonstrate that the commercial area of 23 the site "grew" without a plan amendment or zone change, but 24 rather from staff action in redrawing maps. In addition, 25 Exhibit "F", a memorandum from Jerry offer to the Tigard 26 NEW PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GATES & ELLIS 3200 U.S. BANCORP TOWER t 111 S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-3699 3 I TELEPHONE: 13031229.3:00 Planning Commission on December 9, 1991, confirms that the QQW 1 subject site comprises only five acres. 2 Further, the kind of commercial uses are not equivalent. 3 Neighborhood Commercial uses cannot be larger than two acres, 4 nor have an anchor store size greater than 4,000 square feet, 5 far below the 8 acre and 40,000 square feet maximums used in 6 the community commercial zones. There is no "exchange" of 7 comparable lands in this case; rather, the inventory of both 8 types of land allocations must be studied and the need for 9 I additional community commercial lands at this place justified. 10 That is not the case here. 11 CONCLUSION 12 The applicant has failed to bear its burden of demonstrating 13 r_ompliance-with each approval criterion. Consequently; the AMM 14 applications before the Council should be denied. .15 DATED this 14th Day of January, 1994. 16 PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GATES E L S 17 18 19 Edward ,,c 411' 'an, OSB 69167 Of Attorne s for Matt Marcott 20 Marco t Holdings, and Marcott Thriftway 21 30318-00.002\5Ymsupp.4Y3 22 23 24 25 26 7 PRESTON THORGRIMSON SHIDLER GATES & ELLIS 1 7200 US. BANCORP TOWER 111 S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTLAND. OREGON 97201.7688 y 3 C I TELEPHONE. (307) 228-3200 1 ~ exNi~iz~r, Q -~r .c. s ti .logo AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County Of Was-Ington as. City of Tigard n q ) Z, VXV1 le, 1" `OWATh, , being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print)/' That -I am a ~t uf pGa /15s~5 for The City of Tigard, Oregon. _jZThat I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer ✓Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearin Notice/otice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked A -Mb, Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named per pons at th addr so shown on the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the L- day of ~f!U1e 1r 19 '73 , said notice NOTICE OF D CISION as he_e RR attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the day of , 1 ; and depo~1i~1, in the United States Mail on the L f►- day of , 19 ?3 , postage prepaid. x''1/1 /t/1 ~ p ! " ~ ~•~'l,P~~--•~ Prepared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirm to me on the day of~''~~ , > NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON . My Commission Explres:k -G- q r I ~GVI.IJID~T t1 7 l N O T I C E OF P U B L. I C__ E E A R I N G NOTICE IS EEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, December 14, 1993 , AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CPA 93-0009/ZON 93-0003/SDR 93-0014/CUP 93-0002/MLP 93-0013 FILE TITLE: Albertson's Inc./Duncombe APPLICANT: Albertson's Inc. OWNER: Margery Crist 17001 NE San Rafael Rt. 1 Box 792 Portland, OR 97230 Beaverton, OR 97007 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 93-0009 ZONE CHANGE/ZON 93-0003-- SITE DEVELOPMENT P.EVIEW/SDR 93-0014 CONDITIONAL USE CUP 93-0002 MINOR LAND PARTITION/MLP 93-0013 ALBERTSON'S/DUNCOMBE A request for the following development approvals: 1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to redesignate approximately eight acres of a 12 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on tax lot 200 and to redesignate an approximately 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium-High. Density Residential on tax lot 100. Zone changes accompanying the above plan changes includes a zone change from R- 25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (Community Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre); 2) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 3, square foot multiple-use commercial retail building; 3) Con i ional Use approval to allow the construction of a 4,000 square foot gasoline station; 4) Minor Land Partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately eight acres and four acres each. LOCATION: Southeast and northeast quadrants of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferny Road and SW Walnut Street. (WCTM 2S! 4BB, tax lots 100 and 200) APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.4.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 12.1.3, 12.2 and 12.2.4; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, 18.56 18.61, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.13 , 18.162, and 18.164. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WXTH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 639-4171, EXT. 356 (VOICE) OR 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEER PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MARE ARRANGEMENTS. 3g 1:11 Fill III I li ANYONE WISHING TO PRES1 > WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PRO1D ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR At THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PIIRLT['_ HunutNG, THE CITE =U-N-CIL ri!" RECEIVE A AVI STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY" OUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE P ARING T O O OBTAIN ADDITIONAL ORMATION;'OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLIAATI IF PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER N v-ember24 93, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING., -IIr-THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE FZCORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVl ^.I3_TERT?► APPR1.1CABI F TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD C024PREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE, OR FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE WITH SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY SO AS TO PROVIDE THE CITY, AP•s?LICANT, OR OTHER PARTIES TO THE APPLICATION WITH A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND, WILL PRECLUDE APPEAL ON SAID ISSUE TO THE STATE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS (LUBA). ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES'CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY i CCRDER OR STF4FF PLANNiER Dick Bewersdor_ff AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON 97223. r ' V.A. r W~ LAUR ' The C i t y of T I G A R D w. ENO NORNI CPA &A ~ 93-0009 34 -j-L 33 5 4 W. is PROPOSAL NDON K + T S.W. S i It Art: •y. \ = E TENSIWL = S.W. MAR A A 2P ' < 1i wAINUT ST. N S.W. Y 1 t i ~ 39 • 1..k►My n v 2510500-00200 2510500-t- YiORSE HROS INCHORSE BRCS ITC PO BOX 7 PO'BOX 7. 91 LEBANON OR '97355 LEBAN OR 97355 2SIOSOO-01300 2SIOSGO-01401 EVANS, ROBERT V CgQgCEITJ ~ l~ n~WS A S2i4:+ c+a revniuS 57C 14664 3W SCSOLTS -PERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97230 BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S104BC-00900 2S104BC-01000 LDKER, LARLENE PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 14285 SW FERN acoamAN. ' . TIGARD OR 97223 121 SW SALlS=-= ' Iuz~-r : PFw ~sxZ] ilSYA1tTT3~[IT ' PORTLAND OR 97204 25104°0-00300 2SI04BU-00400 SULLIVAN, TERRY C MATRIX DSVELO ..CORPORATION 5300 PARRVISW DR #2036 7160 SW RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 _ TIGARD 97223- 2SI04BB-00500 2S104BB-00600 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW SAZELFERN RD 7160 SA MkZZf3MRN RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD 97223 2SI04BB-00700 2S104BB-00800 MATRIX DEVELOP2 ~T =RPORATION MATRIX D 'r CORPORATION 7160 SGT RD 7160 S''` PHRAIRD TIGARD OR 97 3 TIGAii?OR 97223 2S104BB-00900 2S104BB-01000 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT RATION MATRIX D CORPORATION 7160 SW RD 7160 SA RD TIGARD OR 97 3 TIGARD 97223 2SlO4BS-Oll00 2S104BB-01200 MATRIX_ DSVELO CORPORATION - MATRIX DiVELO CORPORATION 7160 SW RD - 7160-Ri RD TYGARD OR 97 23 TIGARD 0 97223 s 2S1048B--01300 2S104BB-01400 MATRIX DZVELOPHEkJ7 CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELO CORPORATION 7160 SW mmZLF'ZKN RD 7160 SW HA, & RD TIGARD OR '9 X23.' TIGARD T 97223 g4ft 2S104BB-01500 ' 2S104BB-01600 1WHATRIi DEVE PMENT CORPORATION 2lATRIZ' DSVELO CORPORATION 7160 SW HpdfZLF?ERK RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD O -97223 TIGARIL ~797223 y - MENOMINEE= Ems= 2S104BB-03800 2S104BB-. 0 DURA-BUILT CONSTRUCTION INC MATRIX D PMElJT CORPORATION EVEW 743 6TH, ST • 7160 SW' FERN RD BAfx, LAID; OSWEGO OR• 97034. TIGARD 97223 mom OEM 2S104BB-04600 2S104BB-04700 ROSEWOOD HOMES INC LIVINGSTON, R S 1140 SW 209Th 743 6TH ST BEAVERTON OR 97007 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 2S204BB-04800 2S104BB-04900 MATRIX DEPELO .f1T CORPORATION JIL DEVELOPMENT C 7160 SW Mmmyhm RD _ PO ~ 1633 TIGAItD OR 223 BEAVERqM97075 2S104BB-05000 2510488-05100 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPfJRATION - MATRIX DEVELOPMEYT CORPORATION 7160 Sr4 !Uml°-°: jar M RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD OR 97223 / TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-05200 2S104BB-05300 MATRIZ'DSVEI.OPMENT CO RATION MATRIX DEVELOP CORPORATION 7160-SW HP.ZFT- N 7160 SW RD TIGARD OR 97223 - TIGARD OR 9 23 2S104BB-05400 2S10433-05500 PORTLAND PAINTING' INC MATRIX DEVELOPMERIT CORPORATION 9540 SE WOODED CT 7160 SW RD _ PORTLAND OR 97236. TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-05600 2S104BB-05700 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT RPORATIOId MATRIX DEVELO CORPORATION 7160 SW 7160 Sa RD TIGARD OR 972 TIQARD OR 97223 2S104BB-05800 . 2S104BB-05900 MATRIX DEVEL0 !CORPORATION JIL DEVELAPMHN INC 7160 Sir' RD PO BOX 1633 - - - - - - - TIGARD OR 9 23 BEA OR 97075 2S104BB-•06000 2S104)2a8-06100 MATRIX DEVELOPMEb CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW RD 7160 SW RD T•IGARD OR 97 23 'aIGARD OR 7223 ' 2S B - $6 06 2S104BB-06300 ~ CORPORATION MATRIX DEVEL+O CoalloRiLTIGH 7160.SN RD 7160 SW RD VZGARD OR RA 23 TIGARD 97223 41' 2S104BB-06400 2SlP-.,s6-06500 :S0 E~ey00D OMES ILSC PORTLAND PAINTING, INC 40 209TH 9540 SE WOOLLS CT OR 9TE? PORTLAV O 97236 lip 2S104BB-06600 2S104BB-07200 MATRIX DEVBT,OP CORPORATION CSABAD LD'BAVITCH OREGON 7160 SW RD 14355 SW !2!g CHO FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223• BEAVE=ON 97007 2S104BB-07300 2S204BB-07100 CF38am LUBAVITCS OF OREGON - KLICSITAT VALLEY BANS. 14355 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD PO BOX 167 _ BEAVFRON OR 97007 GOLDENDAL$ WA 98620 2S104BA-01400 2S104BA-01500 S'HABASSEVICH, KARAT/INNA FATEHI, AKIR M. G. CAROL L 13858 SW HINDON CT 13870 SW HINDON CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA-01600 2S104BA-01700 ODELL, ROBERT K JR JOHNSON, KEM0TH C & CARLA C 13892 SW HINDON CT 13918 HINDON CT TIGARD OR 97223 TTGARD OR 97223 25104BA-01800 2S104BA--01900 HOER, JAMS BRIAN JR AND DRAGA, ROBERT F/CATO MM L mcm3 .R }ANNE _ 13901 SW HINDON CT 3.3923 SP MNOON COURT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104P-&-•02000 2S104BA-02100 STSELB, GEOP<GE E & PATRICIA R POLONE, DO2nqICK/EH= O 23869 SW 03NDON CT 225 STANFORD LANE 71GARD OR 97223 SEAL BEACH CA 90740 2S104BA-02200 2S104BA-02300 WEST, JOHN B AND GRETCHEN R- RICKARD, DAVID A/AARGARET S --x,4670 SW=-136TH PLACE 12061 SW WTLTON AVE - T`dGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S104BA-0,,"2400 2S104BA-02500 XLEIN, STEVEN A AND KICKNER, ROBERT L & MAlU:LYN D l9dw- ARET LYNN 13874 SW GRIST CT 12049 SW WILTON AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA-026001.•-- 2SI04BA-02700 : 6ti LL K, AND DEBBIE L PSI.LLIPS, JOHN • F & xRxsTx a 13916 SW CRIST Cr 102-4 5 Svi GULL PL TIGARD OR. 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S104BB-01700 2SIO488-01800 JOIN- TRXX DEVEI.QPHENT CORPORATION MATRIX D ?LINT CORPORATION 7160 SW' NtLFERN RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD OA( 97223 IGZ= . ° 97223 2S104BB-01900 2S164BB-02000 201TRIX DSVELO CORPORATION DURA BUXLT C.MSTRUCTION INC - 7160 SW N RD 743 6TH ST TIGARD OR 7223 LAIC OMq& OR 97034 2S104BB-02200 23104B3-02200 GARY REED DEVELOPMENT INC JIL DEVBIA INC 4420 SW POSONA _ PO BOX 3 PORTLAND OR 37219 BEA Ok 97075•' 2SI04BB-02300 2S104BE-02400 JIL DEVELOPMENT INC MATRIB DEVRL0 CORPORATION PO BOY 1633 7160'SW RD BRAVEMM OR 97075 TIGARD 97223 2S104B3-02500 2S104BB-02600 IOLTRIX DSVM LO COARORATION 'ULTRIX DXVSfA CORPORATION 7160 SR RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD OR 9 23 TIGARD OR 97223 2510423-02800 2S104BB-02900 HAY'PT3L DEVELOPMENT ,ICORPORATXON MATRIX DEVELOP11ElfQT CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZELFElag RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD OR T23 TIGAFtD OR 7223 2S104BE-03000 2S104BB-03100 MATRIX DEVELOPME;NT CORPORATION !ULTRIX DErJSiO CORPORATION. 7160 SW RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD OR 223 TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-03200 2S104BB-03300 12MUX DEVELOP CORPORATION y HAT= DK-MOP _ CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZE&ARN RD 7160 SW RD TIGARD OR 7223 TIGARD OR 97223 20104BB-03400 2S104BB-03500 MATRIX DEVELOP CORPORATION PORTLAND PAINTING, INC 7160 SW HAZRD 9540 SE WOODED HILLS CT TIGARD OR Sj 23 PORTLAND OR 97236 2S104BB-03600 2SI04BB-03700 IMTRIX DEVELOPMENT RATION K mono 2vm 7160 SST HA>~~-•'y BY YOONIQOB HOMES TIGA110M OR 972r-7 PO BOX 2016 LAKE GROVE OR 97036. ~3 2S104DO-03200 1S133CD-. CRIST, MAR.GERY F/JOHN R TRUSTEES WOODSIDE VJU.a.-AGZ 1;76- 15950 SW DEERCREST LN BY JEFFREY BARER B,EAVERTON OR 97007 222 SW COLMMXA $1800 PORTLAND OR 97201 =133CD-08600 1 -08700 BROOXS~- Zvnx =M- w • H AM ILm Et ~+~-.'{'~a°Mi., ssaud'aid P ~'iRA7 Sw (SST CT . 22150 PAR rim #811 _ TIGARD. OR 97223 WXEJZUGHSY MMLS OR 44094 1S133GD-08800 1S233CD-08900 PERRY, RICHARD J & LISA H LAwne, LARR$ D/CBRISTI•M A 13865 SW GRIST CT 12027 SW WILTON AVE TIGMM OR 97223 TIGARD OR -97223 - 1S133CC-00300 IS233CC-00400 CLARK, GEORGE V AND HARGDERITE A HOPPER, MARLIN H & MARILYN D CO TraLsim S 14190 SW SCHOLLS FY RD 381 OABG LEAP DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 EUGENE OR 97404 1S13200-00300 CRAIG CIE CQHM* B88NSIVE DEVELOPHENT CO, IN 9600 SW CAPITOL HWY S GGS (131),~INC PORTLAND OR 97219 201 MINT STREET CITY P 2MNCIAL TOWER $904 HONOLULU HI 96813 CAL WOOLERY 32356 Sw i..) 1ND CT TIGA. OR 97223 DON DUNCOLMBE GROSS ALBERTSON'S INC 11103035 SW 135TH 17001 NE SAN RAFAEL 1 R PORTLAND OR 97230 TIGARD OR 97223 MARL CRIST -RT 1 BOX 792 JODY &''LARRY WESTERMAN' BEAVERTON' OR 97007 13665 SW FERN ST - TIGARD OR 97223 JOHN SHONKWILER, PC 13425 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 RITTELSON & ASSOC INC ' 610 SW PLDER S--700 PORTLAND OR 97205 F a EXHIBIT B c~a .C `A l~ MOM TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 15, 1993 ALBERTSON'S/DUNCOMBE APPLICATIONS (NOS. CPA93-0009, ZON 93-0003, SDR 93-0014 AND MLP 93-0013) COMMISSIONERS PRES.EN z. COMMISSIONER JAMES CASTILE COMMISSIONER HARRY SAPORTA COMMISSIONER RON HOLLAND COMMISSIONER JOE SCHWEITZ COMMISSIONER BRIAN MOORE STAFF PRESENT' SENIOR PLANNER DICK BEWERSDORFF PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY LORRAINE CAMPBELL COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Before we get right into the public hearing, I have a statement to read. This is concerning comprehensive plan amendments 93-0009, and zone change 93-0003 site developments review, 93-0014 conditional use, 93-0002 minor land partition, 93-0013 Albertson Is/ Duncombe. The applicable criteria of those listed on the agenda sheets available at the end of the room and at one end on page one of the staff report. Testimony and evidence must be directed toward the applicable criteria list on page one of the staff report or criteria in the comprehensive plan, or the land use regulations which the person believes apply to the decision. Failure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford the Planning Commission and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes an appeal to the City Council or the Land Use Board of Appeals, based on that issue. Unless there is a continila.nce, if participants so request before the conclusion of the initial evidentiary hearing, the record shall remain open for at least seven days after than hearing. Do any of the Commissioners wish to abstain or declare a conflict of interest? Does anyone in the audience wish to challenge any member of the Planning Commission for bias or conflict of interest? Are there any reports of ex- parte contact, either oral or written? Does anyone in the audience wish to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission? Hearing none, then let's go to the staff report. MR. DICK BEWERSDORFF Members of the Commission, I will try to summarize what is a 1 q4 11~1111~ W11 !11: I'll _ .b relatively complex application. Before I do that, I would like to point your attention to a letter that's been submitted, written the 27th of July, 1993. It says 1992 on it. It's from Larry Westerman. We received this November 15th regarding pedestrian access through the site to be part of your consideration. Also to point out to you, while this is a complex issue, maybe what we'll try to do is talk about the major issues and then let the applicants provide their statement to you and indicate whether they reel it's necessary.for you to go through various issues. I want to point out one change in the first page of the•staff report. While we've mentioned the process that comprehensive plan and zone change for two areas within the plans, the first -paragraph on page one only indicates the change from neighborhood commercial to medium density. Somehow, a typo does not include the entire change. So I'll go through basically what the application is, about and talk about the major issues. The request is basically for a comprehensive plan zone change to redesignate approximately eight acres of a twelve acre parcel from medium density, medium high density residential to commercial. Basically we're talking, this area here, now zoned R-25, before it was zoned R-12-PD. Suggesting' that the application suggested changing that to . so that ...staff report. The additional change is to rG-designate a 6.39 acre parcel from neighborhood commercial to medium high density residential, which is this area here in the triangle. Basically, compensating for the amount of, partially compensating for the amount of residential property that was changed on the CC, the CC change. it also includes, this is the process that we have, it's kind of an unusual process, normally you don't have site development review in a Comprehensive plan, but as.you probably remember, what we adopted , we adopted the CC zone, was a concurrent process where all of those would be reviewed at one time. Your process here, that you will be dealing with, is going to be a recommendation to the City Council. You'll have the hearing, make your findings and make a recommendation to the council. Then the council after that point will have a hearing and make a final decision. In addition to the comprehensive plan and zone change that I mentioned there is a site development review for 57,550 square feet of multiple use retail.. Basically, I show those what is proposed as the Albertson's 40,000 square foot grocery store, approximately 9,500 square feet of additional retail space in the plans and ...has approximately 4,000 square foot each. They are proposing to partition this entire tax lot, partly some on this site plan to include commercial areas, separate that from what would be multi family later. This property was annexed into the City of Tigard in June, on June 121th, 1983. Since that time there has been a variety of plan and 2 'f? fem. zone designations to the area and changes. There has been relocation a. number of times in the CN zone. We have the comprehensive plan case file 9103, which basically details that entire history, I won't go into that. In 1991, Albertson's Corporation applied for a comprehensive plan and zone change that changes the same eight acre area to general y, commercial. Staff has recommended denial to their request. The • } finc°.al dec i.sion waa tc put cn stay at the rs-,es*- of the appl. while the City considered this community-commercial zone. That is what we are here tonight with that set of rules, the community- commercial -rules, the review, that's what the deliberation follows basically is that community-commercial zone. They've applied, they have tried to detail the plan, they have tried to meet all the requirements of the community-commercial zone, the site development review process, as well as the conditional use process. The applicants are asking for a conditional use for a service station in the northeast corner. They don't have the site plans developed to that point. Because of what we saw as a lack of evidence or information about the conditional use request, we suggested denying that part. They would have to come back with a zone change, conditional use request to get that approved. The other part of the conditional use request is for 24 hour operation of the Albertson store. We have indicated that we Ash, suggest recommending approval for that 24 hour operation. Their request also includes listing of a number of uses, listed on page 5 of the staff report, animal sales and services, computer repair services, convenience sales, day care, eating and drinking establishments, general retail sales, general office sales, and indoor sports and recreation, as a group of uses that would be approved with this plan. They don't have tenants in all cases., It is very difficult to arrange for tenants for all places at this point in time. They are asking that this group of uses be approved in the recommenda-.ion that the Planning commission makes. Key issues in our review that we say is ...traffic, that is, the applicant indicates that the design for traffic that will relate to this development in the area will not exceed the capacity of the system. It is our suggestion, however, that what we see as a problem of function and access at this point, somewhere along this area to Northview Drive recommended by both the engineering staff and planning staff. We see that there was some concern when the applicants left this out because of some concern by neighborhood that it would create a through traffic system. We don't feel that the neighborhood itself is set up that would allow through traffic through that neighborhood. Most of the traffic would come from the neighborhood as it goes to use the driveways. No access unless they go out Northview Drive, turn left, . turn left on Mountain view. That will reduce the overall capacity of Walnut in the future. So we are suggesting an access. way be put in here. We are also suggesting that while the applicants' consideration, some of the site is about up to 24% or 24 feet below, right here, that they've 3 ,i got a. long pathway here. We're suggesting that the plan be revised to free up a more direct pedestrian access in this area, either through a switchback system, or changing the parking lot. We're also suggesting that there needs to be additional pedestrian access through the site. The only pedestrian access, other than the . . will have the sidewalks along the perimeter, is this sidewalk system going through to the corner as well as sidewalks around individual buildings. We suggested that access needs to be provided to pedestrians through this way, through the parking lot more consistent and through here and through this driveway connect to all the uses. We're suggesting that that all be done with later detailed planning to be approved by the Planning Director. We also suggest that in the detailed plan that we'll need a detailed landscaping plan. While the applicants provided a relatively detailed landscaping plan, it doesn't calk about size and species of the various plants that are shown on here for us to approve the type of three trees and the landscaping is assured the proper amount of buffering that is needed. Further detail on that. We are also suggesting a noise study be done, relative to the mechanical equipment, the parking and unloading of trucks. Most cases where we have supermarkets, hardware stores, anywhere, anything of that nature near residential areas, there is conflict. Basically, I think that because of the location of this particular site, the low grade is maybe mitigated. But we need to have some assurance that is taken into account. The zoning, the applicants may talk about the design of the building, the design that some of you have primarily showing design of the Albertson's store, we're not talking about the design of the other buildings and we need further details on the design of those. fTA acrc Mr.., That's pretty much the major •u~va issues s as we wu see them. i e there will be additional issues that will relate to Washington County relative to access. We're suggesting also that there needs to be a plan for the residential area to the South, Washington County as well as the City is a little bit concerned or concerned about the access from the residential area to the shopping center. One of the difficulties may be that it will not be able to get additional access onto Scholls Ferry Road from the parking area so we need to see a plan that would delineate how access would serve that residential area and how that ties into the shopping center at the time. Also how it relates to the neighborhood now, the vicinity. We recommended approval subject to a number of conditions. Many of those conditions are typical requirements for a full street, half street improvements, sidewalks. The major ones I believe are the revised site plans including driveway access, sidewalk system and the noise and mechanical report. A detailed lighting plan and a number of other things. The rest of the conditions are pretty 4 ,~q lip 71 similar and standard to what we normally do. As I indicated originally, we also recommended, indicated we will recommend approval of the 24 hour grocery operation but not the service station. We don't have enough information on the service station to make a recommendation. I think there is some concern that this particular location is probably not the best =elati~re t^ vhe neighborhood, being adjacent to the neighborhood. Whether it would serve the gasoline industry or their distributorships. But again, that's subject to your judgement. That's pretty much it. If you have any questions I would be happy to answer those. COMMISSIONER HOLLAND I have got the same concerns that you had concerning traffic. I do see a real need for Northview Drive to have an access. But the other concern that I've got is the multi family housing behind there, at least should have a pedestrian lane. When you have multi family... look at now is pedestrian access to the shopping center so people don't have to drive over. MR BEWERSDORFF The Westerman letter asks, points that out, that they will be looking, would be looking to the applicants to address that. Part 4P of the problem is the difference in grade and the location of the apartments to the shopping center itself, and maybe they can address that in their application statement. COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ It appears to me that there is far too many driveways on Scholls Ferry. MR BEWERSDORFF Our staff indicated that the plan that we found is acceptable, and again part of that would rely on a review of the access by Washington County. So we find that is a reasonable way to go through the review,. Their access permits this as a county road would require special studies. I think if my information is correct they have submitted some of that information and it is under review by Washington, County now and we don't have an answer. MALE But can't we still comment on that. MALE Certainly can. 5 MR BEWERSDORFF Any other questions. COMMISSIONER SAPOPTA If not, let's go to the applicants presentation. JOHN W. SHONKWILER Good evening. My name is John Shonkwiler, and as you know, we've come together before on this issue. I'm here tonight and Don Duncombe is also here tonight. He is an officer of Albertson's. We also have Norm Schoen, the architect for the project and some people from Kittelson and Associates on the traffic reports, if you have any questions on that area. Before I launch into this, I would like to review the background a little bit so you can get a perspective on some of the things that we've had to deal with here. One is that, as the staff pointed out, we started this project about August, 1991, two years ago. In our original application we recognized that general commercial is to go up... and also have restrictions that could make it very difficult. And as an option in our application, we had suggested to the City Council that they adopt a new zone neighborhood commercial. And then in December of'1992, the City Council came back and adopted that CC zoning. Now throughout the process of 1991 and 1992, we met with the ..particularly NCO 7 and CPO 4 for Bull Mountain. I think we had in total, I guess we had six to eight meetings with them at various times. We discussed their aspects of how the CC zone ought to end up and the end result is between the landowners and the neighbors and the CPOs and the planning staff, there was a consensus that built up that the CC zone was fairly well designed for size of the zone, for the uses that can go on in the zone, the limitations, the .guidelines, the standards for the zone and the maximum amount of general retail. The only issue that was left of course, was for the City Council was the size of the grocery store and the City Council adopted your recommendation, 40,000 square feet. Now, after the CC zone was adopted, within a couple of weeks, we went back to the NPO with a revised plan, similar to what we had but not the same. I received suggestions and modifications and suggestions-on usage and types of styling aspects that they would like and we incorporated those in there and when I go to describe what was done here I'll identify some of those changes that were made. On many of those changes we went back before the Neighborhood Association, or the neighbors, back along February, and got some more comments, narrowing it down to fairly close to what we came up with here. And then after that the NPOs were 6 Sr IMMM Aft disbanded by the City and we went through the ordinance procedures, neighbor•notice of that meeting and we held that in July. Now what was interesting the reason why V-- going = 7.._..y ~,.1..... %YiiC litany, what was interesting is, when we started this process two years ago, we were dealing almost exclusively with the existing residences, the existing usage that surrounded the area, that had been built up for yeti There w..> ~ [S~ t- was a seCiC.+ni_t in that an. overall-subdivision that was being developed and hadn't even started back when we started this. What occurred in July 30th, 1993, the people that were most interested were people that had not been involved in this process all that time. These were the people who had just recently bought lots in the subdivision. This was all news to them, so basically we had to explain the process, how it worked, how we got to this point and tell them the compromises that had been made and so forth. Part of the problems have been, is in January we started Putting signs up on the property, these are unofficial signs. The ordinance requires them, these are signs that identify, exhibit G-1 in our application. These are the signs that we put up just to alert people that would be buying lots in the subdivision of Castle Hill that we were intending to do a community commercial shopping center, grocery store, Albertson's and related retail. Those signs were, for instance taken down unlawfully and we had to replace them. I think we ended up putting up signs three times because we tried to keep people alerted as to what was going on. And that's why I'm going , through this to explain. We've went through a lot of .efforts beyond what the ordinance requires, and try to alert everybody to what we intend to do with the property. So in addition to the signs and all these meetings, we also sent letters to each of the builders that bought lots in that subdivision before we sent them out, advising them that they needed to inform their buyers what we were doing and what we had proposed to accomplish. I hope you recognize we made every effort we could far beyond what the ordinance required, understanding that situation and people were coming through here. Now from that I would like to go on with the nature of the application. As the staff pointed out, what ve're proposing basically is to flip-flop the old neighborhood commercial zone off of. . . north of Walnut and change that to multi family as what was at the south of the zone in what is now, south of Walnut returned to CC for using up the eight acres. So in essence we're adding, I guess, 1.07 acres of the commercial to the area and making it an upgraded commercial zone to CC. With that multi comprehensive plan, and zoning ordinance amendment, we also submitted a site development plan which staff is to. you already. A. grading plan, a 24 hour operation for the grocery and two other things, the landscape plan and a sign authorization. Now the landscape plan, as the staff has pointed out is not approved until planned. Our reason for submitting a more detailed landscape plan is normally is for your conception, is because of the CC zone 7 cr 0 is a little bit ambiguous in what is : cy,uirCU {CO inform you of the L scope of what we are proposing. 'So we included in there lull ' drawings of what we new our signs are going to look like as well as what we think the grounds are going to look like. I don't anticipate there is going to be much change and we will identify later on what the specific materials will be.. The point here is my - reading of the OG zone is to try to give you a full scale look, conceptually of what we are going to do. And so when it comes to the sign portion MALE (unintelligible) MR SHONKWILER This is all in the application. You can see we identified the sign here, that's the Albertson's free standing sign. The also have a sign on the Albertson's structure, on the wall. What we are stating here, is that is the concept of the assignment or the proposal for the site. We have our own free standing sign because we're only allowed one. Our wall signs will be of that nature. The site identification sign, this is at the corner of Scholls and Walnut, is this brick along here, a sign from here to here, and they're going to do the lettering for the sign right along this curved wall here. Basically, what we're saying is we would like a recognition that this concept, that the type of signage that we're proposing is acceptable in the overall concept of this proposal for the shopping center and then when we go to the next stage, additional detail. What we are trying to portray here is that we are trying to make an upscale styling for the shopping center and the signage and the landscaping fit within our scale. Now, going a little bit more into the site development plan, the first thing I would like to point out is the topography of this area is really significant. The hill starts from up here and works down this way to the lowest point which is right here. Now what we tried to do, and this is at the recommendation also of the neighborhood association, they did not want the commercial on this side because this is basically the bottom of the hill. If it was built here, everybody would be in back. If this was multi family building here, and all the residences way up the hill over here and higher elevations this way, as well as the people on the level behind us, would all be affected by the noise, and light and activity. So virtually everybody was in agreement that the better plan was to put the commercial on this side. I would also point out from the developers standpoint, this lot over here comes to a point at Scholls Ferry and it tapers off so it's not as easy to do from a commercial standpoint, to develop it and still have adequate buffering. This site to me is a much better system for dealing with those issues and as the neighborhood association had g 53 AEM requested, they wanted us to excavate out as much as possible to lower the sloping down, so that hopefully at this point the top of it would be level with the cut again, or close to it. So that people back here, the residential, the single family residentials up this way would be looking out way over the top of the project rather than looking at a tall, large building in front of them. And- we have done that. Also this will not make it level with Scholls Ferry.. This will actually slope up this way and then level off into the parking lot and we did a rather broad set back from Scholls Ferry to provide buffering along there with the landscaping. Remembering that this land on the other side, west of Scholls Ferry, is going to be multi family in the future and this slopes down so they will be basically looking up at the landscaping. And then hopefully they won't probably see much of the major building there as well. Now this slope back here is very steep. It drops straight down. And this is the back of the Albertson's grocery store. You can see the slope coming right down. This dotted line coming near the line of site, this is the level from the hill, from where the cut begins and you can see it follows the top of the hill to just about here. And it kind of slopes out. That's how much from Northview Drive, which is up here, oops, pardon me, which is right here, if you were standing right there and you were down at street level that's how much of the building we would see. Just that small top portion. That would be, if we didri't have any landscaping, and we are putting all this landscaping in here to screen, so hopefully when this is totally done, what you'll have is an entire site buffered on two sides to obscure the lights, the movement, the buildings and all that. I think it is a kind of unique set of circumstances that we are able to put this in this way. I would point out one thing. Another reason for the need for a flip flop,of the zone. If this were developed as multi family residence as it was zoned for, I suspect that given the cost constraints, a developer of a multi family wouldn't be able to do this type of excavation and make it pencil out. It's really in the realm of a commercial nature to be able to make that work, Now another feature here that is required in the ordinance, is that we have a special feature at the corner of Walnut, here, and Scholls Ferry Road. And what we have proposed for that is this park setting, like a mini park at this corner, and this was with brick appointments for the walkway running right through there. A circle center here, and this would be a feature in the middle for a fountain or a sculpture or something. This is a bench area with a sign for the site identification, shopping center identification on that sign. 9 r here, only this fits is in with the proposed use for the sit down ,s z4+-- nt not estaura not a Burger King or a take out order place of that nature. The neighborhood asccciati.on wanted a sit down, more upper scale type restaurant. That's, what Tue went oUt and sought. I believe we can get Shari's in there, at least, if other people come forward that are of the upper scale nature, Stanford's or Olive Garden... But anyway, we feel that fits in very nicely with the restaurant activities and it's mini park approach. It also enables the neighbors in the area to be able to use this for meetings or whatever functions they might actually propose for a public area forum, a focal point for the neighborhood. Now another feature with this is the staff has proposed that we provide a sidewalk up each one of these entryways and we are more than willing to do that. .I point out one aspect, some of these are pre-done. There is a sidewalk up this side here, we have a sidewalk up this side here. When it comes to this entryway, you have two choices I believe, that's why I want a clarification. We could put a sidewalk on either one of these sides, or we could have ;L^ sidewalk come through this point. Flexibility in where that actual location Also dealing with the next subject, we will be providing sidewalks throughout. If it comes to this pad, now the pad is proposed in our application for a list of potential uses, or outright uses in the CC zone. And quite candidly, that's what we think we'll be putting in here, probably an ofxice of some kind, or maybe a bank, something of that nature. I think that's in reality the reason why, and the only reason why, we submitted a, subject of the conditional use approval for a down sized density was because the neighborhood association said they wanted it to be. I suppose you could say that the oral agreement is that probably that we would include that as one. of the possibilities for a use. Now, quite honestly, if my client had come to me and said I want to put a gas station that's not on a major arterial, and it's going to be a very small thing, it's not going to be more than 4,000 square foot, and it's going to be tucked in .a neighborhood area, I would ask him to check with his doctor. But the neighborhood association thought that a downsized gas station was needed in that area. Now what I suggest, now staff has proposed that you give a denial to the conditional use. What I'm proposing is that we alter the application so it is not a conditional use request at this time. But what I consider it ought to be is that you look at the overall plan and say, if you're willing to do this, is to say that as a possibility, a down sized gas station could be located at this site, if under a separate conditional use permit, the applicant can bring all their plans to the CC zone and it would still be incompatible with the other uses and the internal circulation. 10 r ` Sf The reason why I say this, I think it is appropriate to keep that promise alive that we made. If you decide just flat out that you don't think the gas station is necessary in this area, that it's incompatible to community commercial shopping center here, we are --al t_, not „r, to be upset over it. We never intended on one ~i C:aT"l.11JLY aavv _ to begin with. Now dealing with the next subject that the staff has brought up as Norm Schoen, the architect, I think will go into more detail about this, but the staff has said that this ramp that we have provided, you - have to remember this is downhill, like this, and. it's also .downhill like that. This ramp that we've provided connects up to See the connection here. Now if you will look at this drawing here, you will notice, this is the edge of the building, and this shoots right up. It is very steep, and there's not very much depth here to function. Our purpose for doing the ramp in this fashion, was so that, for instance, for handicap access, a wheelchair, you can take the rather gradual slope, which helps with the wheelchair control, down to this point and follow continuous ramp back. You are not crossing any traffic, you're not becoming involved with any vehicular traffic. And it provides a way right into the site. If you were to turn this ramp around the opposite way, the effect would be, if it starts from here, you would be down here towards the end of the parking lot and now you're starting to get into conflict with other things. It makes more sense to have the controlled access this way. What I suggest to you is that you, the City, wish to have a direct access from here up to here, that you provide that as an additional ac,cess by a staircase. Because I think the switchback is not realistic. I think it's too steep and it is not enough depth, and the result is that we catch trouble from the handicapped people that, that is really frowned on, having tight switchbacks all the way up and down. That kind of a ...So I think that is the only realistic option. If you want a straight access from there, that we provide it in a staircase and leave this draft as it is because I think that works the most practical and makes the most sense. Now, the uses that we are proposing for the site, let me talk about that for a moment. I've already talked about the gas station, that's not on of our higher priority items. The listing of uses that we proposed are basically to A and B and the video store. Now what we have is oral agreements regarding the video store and the restaurant. Now nothing is cast in concrete, but we can possibly get it signed in concrete, contracts with But it looks like a Blockbuster Video could go in there and it looks like a Shark's could go in here. What we think would probably go in A and B over here is something on the order of a specialty shop or an ice cream parlor, some kind of repair shop or some kind of watches or jewelry store, that kind of thing. Probably. And that fits within the 11 S6 allowed outright uses in a CC zone. And this would, Albertson's, so... Now, oh, one other thing I wanted to point out is, this whole alignment the way, we have it spread out, the one party that has the innan-t: will be across here for the future multi family and the family that owns this property, the son owns this, u clam owns this, and they have no problem, and they also own a parcel in the back and they have no problem with the design and think it's compatible with their property uses and they don't have any -objection to the way we've laid this out and the way we have buffered it. Now, we will be providing an extension to the sidewalk, up this way so that we can have pedestrian access through here and also from this end. We've talked about that in our, in the text of our application form. It's hard to show a fence line at this time because there is a BPA power easement over here, we may be running that up through the easement, other than that we're accessing the way the City might prefer it closer in. The main thing is that we can't provide an answer, that this way. This is going to be very steep, two to one slope. We don't want people coming down into our loading dock area; there's a lability issue involved there. Another issue that was raised by the neighborhood association, they wanted those trucks, and that loading area as screened and as hidden as possible, and that's why we stuck it back here behind the noise, the lights, the activity. Everybody could see over that, they won't be looking down into that and the building scraens it from everybody else, so consequently this works out very well. We might even be putting a fence around here to assure you they won't come down that steep slope. So that means your entry point connecting pedestrian access coming up and coming up this way. We do not control this property and it would be very difficult, and in fact impossible, for us to submit a plan of how this is going to be designed. Particularly, since the statements made by the landowners at the last neighborhood meeting are, they had no plans for doing anything like this in the future. Their present desire was they would like to see this all built up first, so that when people come and acquire an interest in this, they will know what they are getting. They will know what they will be looking over and there will be less conflicts with individuals that way. And that actually makes very good plain sense. From a standpoint of what the staff has requested, I think that the family would be able to show how they're going to access this property because I think that is a legitimate point in question, and I think the access is pretty obvious from the way that it was over one hundred feet frontage here on Northview and that is a level curvature in this serfse, so that's undoubtedly how that property will be accessed. AMML We have the BPA power lines, over here blocking, potentially 12 S7 114ft 7, blocking, access onto Scholls although I don't know the contractual relationship with the BPA. And my experience with them in the past is they didn't allow activity underneath the power lines. So, I think we can, as the staff has requested I think we can submit how the accessing will be for that property, but the development plan for that site, there is no way we would ever be able to do that '^til t'.:at • royl%erty available and ready for development. r--r-- i Although.we do know that appears like two potential accesses. Now, going on to the application, I'll try to briefly run through this since we're following it out of the application. There are three basic ways that the CC zone can be supported by code at this site. Any one of the three is acceptable if it satisfies the City as to meeting it's criteria. The first one is inconsistency and I think that's the one that is primarily applicable here. The inconsistency here is that the City adopted a CC concept in the comprehensive pan and the zoning ordinance, so it has not yet provided the CC zoning area, zoning mapping and the comprehensive plan mapping. And it also identified in the adoption process back in December 15, 1992, an inventory of where the potential CC zones could be in the City and listed two, and our site is one of them. And there are two sites outside of the City. It also identified that our site in essence is the prime one. It has the most density, the category that is considered crucial to the CC zone is at least eight units per acre within a half mile. And ours has, planning-wise, fifteen units per acre, that's the highest of both those sites and basically referred to as the site number. Understanding that the adopt_on of the CC zone is not for the purpose of identifying which sites will be CC in the future. That's the hearing today, is whether this site is appropriate. The reason I raised that... [End of side one, tape one.] [Tape one, side two.] MR SHONKWILER That is a context for which the City Council. ...CC...recognizing that there were several of these sites. Of course this was one of the prime sites in consideration. The other two areas, I've gone into, I've detailed, in the application about that. The substance of that is, when this property, this property was annexed into the City, prior to annexation it was designated Neighborhood Commercial by Washington County. And when it was annexed into the City, the City took that same name, Neighborhood commercial, and applied it to this site. Within the City zone, because the City had... Unfortunately the two zones are not alike at all. County's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance for Neighborhood Commercial is more equivalent to 13 S111 MOM i__ NF L... T 1w `~S~Ca l7 V ca_v7 T1ff nn-r-rPCt a cc Gone that thra C.-L .y. xou ~A-Aw %r that identifying this site as CC, then bring that into alignment. And then you wouldn't have the inconsistencies that the current zoning has neighborhood commercial is almost three times too big for what the Comprehensive Plan sets as a maximum. And it's almost three times too big for the so we'll eliminate those errors. n*±d ?iso we've identified change in the neighborhood and community a development that's occurred, what the density in the area is, sewers have been added. That would be the type of activity that's generated in that area is appropriate for a CC zone at this time. Now I also, just briefly run through that, in the application form I looked for detail in the locational criteria. Essentially the bottom line of this is, our site is within the eight acre The square footage that's approved for the CC zone is 30,000 to 100,000 square feet._ What we're proposing here is 57,550. So that's 57.5% of what the maximum, relatively midway between.. There is a reason for that. One is that, it's no big secret, when we first came to the City about this we wanted to have no property closer to 100,000 square feet. The City and the neighborhood association didn't want that kind of density at this site. So instead of coming back at you with a whole bunch of substitutes. We've taken out the wording, and that is basically that the down density sized project with an.upscale And that V4W matches with our neighborhood association And finally with that issue, the spacing on this location is within the zoning agency requirement-and we feel-public retail... concern here. Now the final, issue with that is... recently proposal with the exception of the conditional use for the gas'station, all of the other uses that we proposed are uses that would be allowed outright in the CC zone. So we're asking for approval of that. As Dick pointed out, it's real difficult to get commitments on a conceptual plan, particularly where this isn't even zoned for this use yet. If the City approves the zoning, a commitment is hard to convince somebody. They won't, before they are going to come in and do market studies and all that other stuff, they're going want to know some assurance that this is a law. So actually I feel Blockbuster Video share'to say that if they can get this through they can consider us as a real strong opponent. Now with that CONII+'lISSIONER SAPORTA Can I interrupt you for a minute? 14 v s~ . P'!R. SHONK-WILER Sure. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA You need to hurry it up. MR SHONKWILER Yeah. I have gone through my discussion of all of this. What would be next would be...go over any questions you have ...characteristics for the site and the future. And then we have Kittelson and Associates for questions you have on traffic impact. And then after that I'd like to come back and just close out by making some comments about the conditions of approval the staff is proposing. Are there any questions so far? COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Let me just make a comment. You're taking more, time than we normally allow so please go through the...a bit more quickly. ® W? P n nT-T -L, r No a o. ~.aavs. Good evening, my name is Norm Schoen. I'm the architect on this project. And I guess I would entertain your questions on this as they pertain to the building design and the site design itself. Maybe some of the items that John brought up in case you'd like further explanatio. on it. Does anyone have any questions? COMMISSIONER SAPORTA I have a couple of questions regarding site design. And I don't know if it pertains, more to the traffic analysis than maybe you might have an offer, but, why wasn't an access provided on Northview? MR. SHONKWILER Let me answer that. The reason is, we'll just use this (map),this ` is North and this is Northview Drive. When we first went back to the neighborhood association with the conceptual plan to start with, they said they did not want any access in to the site along here because they felt that this kind of activity would interfere with their single family dwellings along this site. And in honor of that, we didn't provide for that. Now, maybe some of the neighbors are here tonight and might like to speak to that themselves. I would point out just these features. One is that there is about 15 ~a ARM foot rise through here and these are all single family a seven residences along here. For instance, at night a car pulling up in here with their headlights, probably would be shinning right up in a second story bedroom window or, noise that is generated. The other feature with that is the CC zone has a policy •...and gran tcu it's a big balloara policy. But one of them was to try and encourage the best possible access. Having a direct access for automobiles... subdivision... would encourage driving a car rather than taking the sidewalk... And also we would only basically save about three hundred feet of driving. They could just go down and turn and come in here. So that's basically the fundamental,reason. And frankly I agree on that standpoint. ...traffic advantage... And also it probably would open up the possibility of more people using than should be using it, they cut out to go this way, where the ...a block up here. If you did approve it, I would suggest quite strongly that if the purpose is to provide a right out. Otherwise it doesn't make a lot of sense. Now the other thing is the q+,est.ior of access. This is primarily accessed trucks... neighborhood association... . This is the main entrance. All of the turnings coming in and out. This is a right out, right in only so you are restricted to that. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Anyone else? Okay, I'guess we don't have any other questions. MR. SCHOEN The materials that will be common through out the site, through all the buildings... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Does anyone have questions about the site study? UNIDENTIFIED I have. I agree with your advice, but I do believe the state is right... The way I would like to see the direction go is that people have access to shopping centers without going onto the thoroughfares and that is something-for a longtime. And I know that people don't like their neighborhood touched by outsiders but unfortunately we all-and access should be from all directions. I don't see, or do not, or creating a situation where everybody has to go on either Scholls Ferry or 16 r Gr I I daft COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Okay, anybody else? MR SHOITRWILER I think there is an item as far as we were talking about the access off of Northview. Exception with this intersection. By pushing this further down, realize the slope is coming from a high to a low down here, I think the corner here, so if we could come back at a much less grade itself at this level, a very steep, you are going to have to go quite a distance coming at this point, level.. From the design standpoint, I think they are taking up much less space. in providing a greater activity, pedestrian use, wheelchair access or whatever. And from that standpoint I think we've got a good solid reason for pushing this grade on the slope further. I'd be the first to agree if this were the flat side, it would make perfect sense to go ahead across the street at this point, but unfortunately we've got some fairly severe site conditions that we're trying to deal with. And I think we've tried to utilize ...so maybe this is a tradeoff that we'd have to go with the screening. UNIDENTIFIED I think ...landscaping if we don't. MR SHONKWILER ...that probably makes sense UNIDENTIFIED I do agree with your kind of a ....but I also feel that COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Just one general comment. One thing that I see missing is, the site seems to be very friendly towards. the automobile. And the whole concept behind the commercial, community commercial destination was to make it serve the immediate area within a short distance. Now I recognize that some of those trips are going to be automobile, but we were hoping that a great many of those trips could also be by foot. I don't see how it makes it real easy to get into the site by foot. UNIDENTIFIED Well, I think taking what you've said as far as being... towards the automobile, you have to realize that... entrances that we do have on to the site, this is basically a service access, so in essence that's one less entrance. This is going to be a main, it's off of 17 Scholls and this is going to be off Walnut, and this is a restricted access. So some of the discussion on this is actually -providing additional entrance. There is some sort of c,-~„fi,ct there, that , vn,~ 1 _e cay-I ng that it may be too friendly to the automobile now but yet looking at adding another drive access. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA What I'm saying is that even if you were to access either driveways, getting from those driveways to the store, you have to go through a parking lot. I don't see pedestrian pathways. MR SHONHWILER Let me talk about that. I think maybe with the overall scope of what the surrounding pieces are and ...conflict, we could have not bid out the site at all, and put the buildings up for sale decided that they'd prefer to have them cut up. That creates a - problem. Now you have a very steep slope here. The only access for the multi family uses They have to come from down here and come back in. This may be...if we put the ...facing here... To be honest with you, the kind of impact flow that you're going to get, this works, even though the setting of the hillside, this works. Now the people feeding this way, they can get in from this side, but the main thing is, these are all single family. On this side of the street 'there is another sizeable multi family unit. And this is a very easy access, and they have multiple choices of that. New I understand... go through this way-And we are going to provide additional-This is all multi family along here as well, so considering the amount of activity of multi family. I think the access for those two sides is fairly good. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA What's the distance between the driveways on Scholls Ferry? UNIDENTIFIED Approximately 200 feet, this is a longer one, this is probably 250. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA okay . UNIDENTIFIED Ask 18 ORTA COMMISSIONER SAP Now what if we took Metros idea and turned the building so it's right up against Scholls Ferry. And allowed more access from the neighborhood that way. You could redesign the hill with the entrance in the back side. MR SHONKWILER Going back to our...the possibility that ...this way-or this way. And one means a layout this way, there is too much density. This way...totally defaats the purpose of using the-side... If you put the building this way, then that's what everybody's going to seem out of place with the... surrounding neighborhood ...And that's one of the policies ...try and design the site and the building in such a way that ...and exposure ...of the neighborhood. So that this way, the biggest building is tucked into the hill, you hardly notice it...as you can see-and try and make it more compatible with the neighborhood site. Along these roads, so hopefully when this is all built out and the landscaping is all mature you're hardly going to notice it, this activity, as you drive by it, unless you... That's the whole concept, so I understand what you're saying but again the tradeoffs that were made in the design concept I think work the best for 1';.his site. And... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Well, that may be true but if you're having multiple family dwelling right behind you that's going to be two or three story level, it does away with what you're trying to accomplish right there. MR. SHONEWILER Well, all the single families on this side. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Possible, on that side but I'm talking right behind the building. MR. SHONEWILER This way. i COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Right behind the building. UNIDENTIFIED if we're saying the building's up here, that's all we're going to be looking at, a big long 19 MR. SHONKWILER I think this, as far as a solution to what was brought up, is probably an ...back into a corner, almost burying a part of the building itself.. I mean it's certainly less obtrusive than if we had tried to bring up-structure itself. It's going to have less ° % visual impact the way 'aay we design it than ii WG Steott to raise IL out. ...better site lines ...cut down... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Well, I'll be very interested to see the report on traffic. Thank you. BR SHO.*TK1 ILER Did you want the traffic report? _ C014MISSIONER SAPORTA Please. MR. EVAN DUST Good evening. For the record my name is Evan E V A N Dust D U S as in Sam, T as in Tom. I am with the firm Kittelson and Associates. 610 S.W. Alder, Suite 700, Portland, Oregon, 97205. I'd be glad to answer any questions you may have with respect to the traffic study dated August, 1993 that was submitted to attorney... COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ Okay, as noted it's about 200 feet between driveways. Now Scholls Ferry. is a very major road, and I feel that those driveways are absolutely too close together for a big store like this. It's just, I think you're going to have to have signaling somewhere along, as it develops and what are you going to do if you have cars turning in front of each other in a short distance? MR. EVAN,DUST I trust you've read our traffic study. COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ No, I didn't, not totally. That': why I'm asking these questions. MR. EVAN DUST Okay. Scholls Ferry Road is a Washington County facility. It's classified as a major collector. It currently has one way in each direction at a posted speed of 45 miles per hour. It is on the MEN= 20 ~5 transportation plan of Washington County, the idea behind this is that with the turnover of old Scholls Ferry, which is actually the newly reconstructed old Scholls Ferry, from the :Mate of Oregon to Washington County, that will become the primary ...within this area. And in fact by 2010 conditions Washington County plans to cul de sac the existing intersection of old Scholls Ferry and new Scholls Ferry at the east end. With that Washington County tells us from their transportation model that approximately 75% of the traffic currently on Scholls Ferry Road will convert to old Scholls Ferry Road. That also leads to a presentation of a major collector versus old Scholls Ferry Road designated as a major arterial. The spacing standard in Washington County for the major collector is a hundred foot space. This site with three access's provides two hundred feet of space. We've examined the issue of, the provision of western storage, and we've recommended that the closest access to Waln'lt be restricted to right in, right out to provide sufficient storage for the The requirement for three access's is dictated by the unsignalized nature of All three access points are too closely spaced to Walnut and Scholls Ferry which will eventually be signalized with the extension of Murray Boulevard, down at that point, to allow AM, QP signalization of the accesses to this site. We runt to separate service vehicles, large trucks from customer traffic. We don't want to add that extra vehicles so you provide a separate service access. So we take one of the accesses, that's the service access, we have one main access which allows both left out and left in. And we have a secondary access to Scholls Ferry which allows right in, right out. Under that three access proposal all accesses will operate at unsignalized level of service or better in the year 2010. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Anyone else? No. MR. EVAN DUST Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED Excuse me, the subject of the access onto Northview has come up. In your expert opinion, what kind of effect do you think that would have on the neighboring area? MR. EVAN DUST If, I refer to the traffic...traffic...provided in our., report, that's figure six and figure seven. Figure six is sort of an 21 6G EMMMM ultimate configuration with Walnut extended and figure seven is without walnut extended. If you notice that the access onto Walnut has all of five exiting trips to the south without them. And twenty entering trips, from the south. Beings that you are going f-^ provide an additional access, it saves all of twenty five trips. Of which, at most, one half of them, at the very most one half of them are coming from the immediate adjacent residential area. UNIDENTIFIED Is that based on how it fills out now or future. -buildout of that... MR. EVAN DUST That is, that projection, that interim (near term) projection, which complies with both the requirements set up by Randy Wooley and the requirements set up by Washington County, includes the public development listed in figure 8. It represents all known residential developments that are already improved in the area. UNIDENTIFIED How about the connection of Murray and Walnut? MR. EVAN DUST The connection of Murray and Walnut is included in Washington County's 2010 forecast. ..examined 2010 conditions. It shifts some of the traffic that will be attracted to this site from let's say Murray Hill and some of the areas in Beaverton. That shifts over because it is now more convenient to use Murray to reach the site than it is to essentially run opposite direction on Old Scholls and then come back on Scholls Ferry. So you're shifting off site trips around a bit but you're not shifting the orientation of access use. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Okay. Any more questions? Thank you. MR. EVAN DUST Thank you. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA No one has signed in opposition so I guess we'll take those in favor. Jody Westerman. 22 ~ R , 11511112111,11111, "1 EROSION I 17 m7i MR SHONKWILER Could I make one short comment about... COMMISSIONER SArvRTA Very short. MR. SHONKWILER Just a reminder..:petition to the staff... the option of the road entrances one is to provide vehicular access directly 'to a shopping center... versus the CC zone... accomplish... From the standpoint, if the City says we're only going to approve the shopping center if you provide-surrounding area. The second one is the sidewalk to Northview. We talked about that. I suggest you review... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA John, you will have a chance for rebuttal. This sounds like rebuttal. MR. SHONKWILER Alright. JODY WESTERMAN Good evening. My name is Jody Westerman. I live at 13665 S.W. Fern Street in Tigard. And the letter that you referred to earlier is from my husband Larry. He usually is the one in our family that reviews this stuff. I'm here basically to say that we have no objection to the Albertson's development as it stands for the most part... consideration from the neighborhood concerns. And certainly Larry can speak better to that since he's very much involved. Our major concerns had to do with .the fact that this is coming into a community that all ready exists and one which we would like to see pedestrian access, but we'd like to see pedestrian access be made as safe and accessible as possible. That's one of our goals. Having that entrance on the north side as you're proposing... certain amount of impact on that in terms of how that's going to negatively affect the community. As a person who deals with children all the time I can just tell you, I can see a kid coming down that long ramp access and not making the corner. So I 'was wondering about putting in an access on the north east side where the residents cross. WP would like to see a staircase put in, if that's at all possible, somewhere up where the multi family 23 SO ild 11 dwelling is. I understand you can't put it in the back-trucks coming. That would certainly be a safety issue. But if you could put it at the other end of the site so that you could get in. People. are going to came in the way that it is most ~ia~ W mi-hcsr 'ghat means convenient for them, eSYcCya.L1Y - scrambling down the hillside, landscaping or not, but that's the way they are going to try and get into it. If you put a safe access by the stairwell, that would be helpful. When people are coming in here from the Walnut, and especially if they're going to be having more housing development, these are the people who are coming along this way. One of my concerns is the people coming across this parking lot. If at all possible, I noticed that in some of the Fred. Meyer stores and other_ places where they have long parking lots where they are trying to also encourage pedestrian traffic, what they've done is they've made raised walkways through the center area where the cars are. If there was some possibility to do a raised walkway through this, that's one way to make this a safe access for anybody who is coming in here. That's great, that sidewalk here, but how are they going to get from here to here without getting hit by a car. And again, we live in a place where we use cars a lot but people, we're looking forward, we live back up on Cottage Street,, and we're looking forward to having a store that we can walk to. But we need to make it as safe as possible. So then a stairway at this end somewhere, with an access across here, you can call this right here your commercial access. For peo,ile that are going to walk in please provide sidewalks along here. They are going to walk in the store to the front of the building. Just because you say that's not supposed to be a pedestrian access commercial-walk over. Alternatively, they will try to get in where ever it is convenient. I guess that's all I have to say. Unless you want to ask me any questions. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Just a comment. I concur with your comments. JODY WESTERMAN Thank you. One other thing I might mention to the person sitting in the audience. I understand that you all are trying to... I sit back there too, and I can't see that when I sit back there. So if you could make it possible for your audience, all of your audience to see what you're doing up here, it might get us on your side. UNIDENTIFIED Good for you Jody. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA 24 G; Ilium! Craig Petrie. CRAIG PETRIE Hello. My name is Craig Petrie and for the record my address is 9600 S.W. Capital Highway, Portland, Oregon 97219. I represent the property owners. ...in the interest of time... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Scott Russell SCOTT RUSSELL Good evening. 'My name is Scott Russell and I'm one of the members of the family that owns this property. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Could you please state your address? SCOTT RUSSELL Yes. My address is 31291 Raymond Creek Road. Scappoose, Oregon, 97056. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Thank you. SCOTT RUSSELL Again, I've been involved in the process. If there are any questions that you have of me, I'd be happy to answer them. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA I do have a question. Do you own that property then, behind there? Behind the store here. SCOTT RUSSELL Yes. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Okay. Is there some possibility there could be a stairs coming right where they have Blockbuster's there, that little, right there. 25 NMI SCOTT RUSSELL You're talking this UNIDENTIFIED Or a little bit even closer to Steve, s gint tlLere. SCOTT RUSSELL Up in here? UNIDENTIFIED No, up a little higher, where that little jog is, right there. Is there a possibility there could be a little walkway from there to that multi family? SCOTT RUSSELL Well, I don't have but I think that's a possibility. It's the same as having access over here. We don't have a layout on this, in fact we can't lay out this or anything on the other side 7. until... mom= COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Isn't this a lower end though. It's a lower and shorter distance down. SCOTT RUSSELL Yes it is. I don't know if there are safety concerns because of this being this sort of entrance. But that certainly could be a possibility. UNIDENTIFIED I just thought that might be-considerations. SCOTT RUSSELL I,think there will be a sidewalk in this area here, as well. But we certainly wouldn't have an objection to that. Any more questions? Thank you. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA I have a question for staff. If no one spoke in opposition, is there a rebuttal? 26 7 r MR. BEWERSDORFF It is appropriate to allow the applicant to continue his presentation of the conditions. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA You have the opportunity, but I have to warn you, I'm only going to limit you to five minutes. MR. SHONEWILER Yes. Okay. I want to make one comment about the access to the ..I wish I had the other site plan. The case of multi family use, the access from the multi family will be undoubtedly right here. You have the buildings along here. The only way that these people would be going over would be at this Northview intersection. Of which this sidewalk crosses to bring you right along here, and right in all the way down here and go across the sidewalk that nobody will use, right. I want to point that out. You have to look at realistically what functions. Then quickly, oh, there they are. Going down the list of conditions. You have condition 2E, which is the building design detail shall be provided for the entire development. I think there just needs to be a clarification. We -won't be able to provide exact details of each of the buildings until we get some commitments out of them. Although as soon as we get commitments we'll be submitting that particular for the building. So long as it's in that context, if we had to submit everything all at once, before we even start construction of it. It would be really difficult to get that. 2Q- is redevelopment plan shall be submitted, that we just talked about before. And as I said to you previously, I don1t think there is a problem with identifying where the access illustration would be, is, but giving you a site development, or redevelopment plan for that site, we're incapable of doing. And then finally the denial of the service station. I've already talked about that. Ron asked me just that you would say that, it is a possibility that we could make a condition, a separate conditional use here. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Well then how do.you get access to the service station? MR. SHONKWILER Well, I'm just saying to keep that option alive for the City Council to make that determination. Because we can sit there, as 27 ROOM you've done, you fold your arms across.your chest, cpuse that's exactly what I did when the subject first came up. I understand. But as several neighbors really reiterated that issue to me, I felt that it was our obligation to keep it going to the City Council. ,L'CSmissiANFR 9APOTlTn When you're talking about the neighbors, you're talking about the...right? MR. SHONKWILER Well, actually . . . COMMISSIONER SAPORTA According to this report from staff, it said in the report, a small gas station should not be included. Now, are these two different groups of people? MR. SHONKWILER No, then that must be a misprint or some Bang thing, because Well, let me put it this way, Amok& C02414ISSIONER SAPORTA There is somebody in the audience.:. MR. SHONKWILER It would be my guess... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA I'm just curious about that point, that's all. MR. SHONKWILER Yeah. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA FIR. SHONKWILER The neighborhood association members, it the same 'way I feel, said they wanted to have the gas station. And at both of those meetings that we had in January and February, that issue came up. And they... 28 7~ r COMMISSIONER SAPORTA This is my next question of staff then. If we deny a conditional use for a gas station, is that possible for someone to come back at a 1--tcc:, -datc and k fog c col-d? e.' (T- i ii i DeXIl11L tor? MR. BEWERSDORFF You'd have to C014MISSIONER SAPORTA Okay, I was just wondering. Any further questions? MR. SHONKWILER Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED I have another question of staff, too, a question, if it's alright. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Well if you don't want me to close the hearing, go ahead. UNIDENTIFIED I can ask my question after that. UNIDENTIFIED You can go ahead and just close the hearing. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Public hearing is now closed. UNIDENTIFIED Oh, I have a question. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Jf staff, just out of curiosity, this list of permitted use under the CC. Is that, that's a pretty complete list,... Now when it says eating and drinking facilities, the question came up about a restaurant, whether it be a Shari's or something higher up. When they say eating and drinking facilities, does that include the possibility of Burger King or MacDonalds or something. 29 7 MR. BEWERSDORFF It could have, yeah, it could. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA But on the other hand we could condition . MR. ti3ETTERSDORFF Yes, you could condition it, but you're also living with, basically the layout design that was provided to you. And that design does not include a design that would allow a drive through. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA So you're saying that can freeze that possibility of a drive- through. MR. BETIERSDORFF Yes, that's the way I look at it. UNIDENTIFIED Aft COMMISSIONER SAPORTA I'm just clarifying how upscale we're talking about here. UNIDENTIFIED But we could exclude that. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Yes. You're right UNIDENTIFIED And in short, drive through, exclude any drive through eating establishment.. UNIDENTIFIED Well, you could have a Burger King without a drive through,if they want, I suppose. UNIDENTIFIED What you're saying is no drive through, or whatever. 30 Moll 0 UNIDENTIFIED And I'm probably going to address that as well as the conditional use process. If you have a modification of this plan, it's very difficult when you have a comp plan and site plan and everything own the 3 -I ne you're goi ng to aiu'v'c a %A L.L put together, sametime - modification. UNIDENTIFIED In the code requirements, it talks about modifications and going through the process similar to the zone change, but as a conditional use. Which would mean basically, rather than going to a hearings officer for a conditional use approval, we would come back to you with a detailed plan for a conditional use that would have the hearing by the Planning Commission. Zone change goes basically to,the Planning Commission. It does not go forward to the council. But basically your process would be, and that would still give them the opportunity to come back at a later date, for example, for the service station, by coming back with a public hearing for you. So that's why we're suggesting denial at this point. In the other group of major modifications of this design does not comply, then that design would have to come back and enter that very same process. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED I also might mention that based on the applicant's comments, I can suggest some modification of some of those conditions possibly if you get to that point where dealing with the driveway, the staircase, as well as the redeveloped plan. I think I can change those to be satisfactory. UNIDENTIFIED We'll deal with the issues. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Is there any discussion? Commissioner Holland. COMMISSIONER HOLLAND Only what was mentioned before. I do agree with the City, that the ramp is not sufficient. I do like the idea, I think it's a great 31 76 design, But I do believe that there should be a requirement for some stairs up on Northview. And, of course my other comment is, I agree with the City for requirement for vehicular access. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Commissioner Moore. COMMISSIONER MOORE Well, I'll just go through, Commissioner Holland is correct. I think that staircase is required, should be required. There's going to be a path through here someday ...grocary store... [End of tape 1] COMMISSIONER MOORE The comment that came up about the sidewalks. 1 see, I have a, I live near an Albertson's store now and I see a lot of people cutting through the parking lot, long winded drivers cutting through the parking lot diagonally and across. And I think sidewalks is a terrific idea, not only to keep the people on sidewalks, but keeping people's cars from cutting through the parking lot. Of course, I'm as guilty as anyone, of doing that. It's quicker. I think we ought to deny conditional use for the gas.station, let them come back at a later date. I'm open for suggestions on the drive through portion, about any possible future restaurant. And it doesn't make any difference to me whether it's Burger King there ,or not. And maybe that might be something to look at, at a later date. If somebody_ wants to. or something like that, it would have to come back Then a standard comment about the half street at Scholls Ferry. I think that's something that should, and I believe other development along Scholls Ferry are also ...half streets along there... Other than that I agree with the staff's recommendations. Well thought out. As far as the design goes, I'm not an architectural review committee. And I like the idea of having it tucked back in the corner like that residential area., COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ I concur mostly with what you've said. I understand the is 32 nice but I'm not sure it's really, totally the best dasig„ after build out of the whole area. But with what we're having to work with, I think it's all right. I think the neighborhood really does not have enough access. There is still too such access on Scholls Ferry for my viewing. What we're trying to do is get people off the main roads in a safe manner, and when you have driveways close together, we.noticed on Highway 99 W, that we have some real major problems. And I think, no matter what we say, that this road will be, with a shopping center there, it's going to draw traffic. And that's my main concern. And I think also, the accessibility has been addressed somewhat but not totally, as far as the ramp goes. And that's nice, but again through the parking lot the accessibility hasn't been laid out at all. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA What about the drive': would you want a driveway on Northview? UNIDENTIFIED Aftk Yes, I think there needs to be a whole access there. You've got to balance it. COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ Vhat I don't remember is, you know I got interrupted, and I'm not sure I commented about that myself. It's on my list here, I must have gotten sidetracked or something. I'm not sure that, I think it's a good idea. It's not something that I would deny the whole plan over, commissioners. And if they feel that's a good idea, I'll go along with them ...The amount of, traffic that may bring in may be minimal compared` to the whole picture. I'm kind of open for anybody's ideas. COMMISSIONER CASTILE When I look at the overall picture, I'm thinking if we open that up, we're really creating a, just a drive through, a massive area for cars to go every which direction. And I think in lieu of the fact that we're, a community store that we're trying to get, that by limiting that so that there's not quite as much traffic that's going every which direction, versus the public being able to walk through there with a little more safety than just not knowing what; funneling all the traffic in more, in the other direction, versus having them go any direction. And I understand that we normally try to open everything up so that the people can get out easily. But I just, in the community situation here, I think it kind of limits the store a little bit more, and surrounds it, so it isn't 33 7& quite a wide open free for all.., other than that I think the st6irway should go in there. I like the ramp and being able to access coming through there for People walking. I think that the very design of the wilea Shari's, that would not be conducive to a drive through. And they would have to change it. And in order to change it they, would have to come back to the Planning Commission. So I don't see a problem with having a drive through in that situation. other than that I think it's a good design. COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ In that respect if maybe we did put that extra driveway in, maybe you don't put one on Walnut. That would accomplish somewhat, like they've said before, if the high density across the street isn't straight with the...they are going to have to jog to get in there if they're driving. So maybe there can be some modificatioi?s in that, but generally I think UNIDENTIFIED There is a seven foot drop there, coming off of Northview onto the parking lot. I think you're asking for some trouble. UNIDENTIFIED I can understand what Commissioner Schweitz is saying. And also I understand what you said about the cross traffic makes a lot of sense. Going through here, I know that happens at the Albertson's store, right there at Summerfield intersection. UNIDENTIFIED Get out of the way! UNIDENTIFIED Much less with people cutting across through to get to MacDonald Is, and whatever else, and the gas station that's over there too. UNIDENTIFIED But, here we go again, with the same ideas, you're saying a community store but you want to cut the community off from it by not having an access to the neighborhood. UNIDENTIFIED I don't think that the 300 feet 34 79 r 71 UNIDENTIFIED UIYIDENT I. I231D That's what I'm saying... UNIDENTIFIED But I really like . . . UNIDENTIFIED COMMISSIONER HOLLAND Putting a raised sidewalk in there also, so we don't, so it isn't, again, so it's more of a community store and it isn't the situation that there is on Durham, where you better take your life in your hands when you're walking through there. UNIDENTIFIED My point, Commissioner Holland, was that when you go do your weekly shopping, you're going to drive anyway. And whether you've got to go around the block, you're only talking maybe a hundred, couple :Hundred homes in there. And I don't think you're going to have a massive traffic jam. UNIDENTIFIED No, what I'm talking about is the same thing that we ended up on Pacific Highway, is that in order to go to the store, drive to the store, we've got to go out onto Pacific Highway. And this is a major problem in the-State and we're seeing it on Highway 99. That's why I think we should have access, vehicular access. UNIDENTIFIED Not necessarily on Walnut. UNIDENTIFIED I didn't say on Walnut. UNIDENTIFIED No. But to the neighborhood association... 35 Aft UNIDENTIFIED Unless Walnut is punched through we're going to have a lot more traffic coming down here. That's why they are building this store. pet people from all other neighborhoods to And everybody said what t Ct%c You ,e A^-inn'? UNIDENTIFIED Before you think about taking out the access, the Walnut access, I think you'd want to ask for more information. That's a significant access way that's integral to the operation of all those streets. I think I see that one as a mandatory right there UNIDENTIFIED Here, let me put in my two cents. UNIDENTIFIED Okay. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA On the conditional use, at this point I'm not in favor of granting a conditional use. I'd rather have it come back to the Planning Commission for review. And just force that issue. In general I have a problem with the pedestrian flow through out the whole site. The question that I was originally asking, is that, or commenting to, is that, there really isn't a provision for pedestrian access within the interior of the site. What I see is just cutting through traffic stalls. That to me is not safe access. This is supposed to be a store that will serve the immediate community,. As I said earlier, the expectation is that a great deal of those trips would be done on foot. If, I understand that in order to do your weekly shopping you need some sort of vehicle larger than a bicycle in order to carry all the groceries. But on the other hand there will be a great many trips that can be accomplished by foot or bicycles, for those loaf of bread or some milk, or just a few incidentals. So I would like to see something that addresses the need for a.pedestrian walkway system in the interior. As far as the Northview driveway, I truly have mixed feeling about that. One the one hand I agree with Commissioner Holland who says that well in order to get in they have to drive all the way around. But on the other hand providing a direct access precludes you from having to go all the way around and not getting onto Walnut or Scholls Ferry,Road. As far as the rest of the, I also agree that there should be a . 36 staircase or some other pathway provided from the Northview site and maybe even a couple of different pathways. One maybe by the path as well. And lastly, I pretty much agree with the rest of the recommendations in the staff report. And with those comments made, UNIDENTIFIED We also have the conditional use ...24 hour... COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Are there any comments about UNIDENTIFIED I don't have a problem with that. UNIDENTIFIED I don't have any problem with that provided the other requirements are met in terms of noise and things of that nature. MR. BEWERSDORFF Based on those comments and what I heard from the applicants, may I make a suggestion? Some suggestions? COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Sure. UNIDENTIFIED All in favor of a motion? MR. BEWERSDORFF Just to help you out, with 2A-1, driveway access between the site, S.W. Northview Drive, I would suggest adding a right out, left turn design for that particular one. That's going to be a little difficult in a design sense, as Randy said. But we've discussed it with Randy and if there is a way to do it we'll figure it out. I think that takes care of some of the boggles of that particular access going in and out. The engineers and us feel that there's going to be over a period of time, enough cars that that makes suitable access. So we suggest modifying the driveway access with a right out and left in design at the end of that condition. Also in number 2A-3, rather than the proposed sidewalk, write a proposed sidewalks slash stairway from the grocery store to connect 37 END= am- Ad0k 1W with Northview Drive at Starbucks and shall be combined with the applicants proposed ramp. So that way we would have both. On 2E, I would suggest starting the building design details to suggest conceptual building design details so we don't lock them into a specific design. I think that could be misconstrued. It's utoa.c Lal4aa, uaaJ.a:ai1.Y a a,.vaao.i.aa.caYt. uca.Y.yYY w3t,11 waYcit l illy' VE been proposed, throughout the Albertson proposal. If we could wake those consistent, we could look at the design, see if it was consistent and it would be okay. So I don't think we're going to lock them into it. I could read that, the building design details as being very specific. I don't think that with this case it is vital to be that specific. Unless you would want to see them come back with everything. That's impossible I think. And then on Q, our real concern is access. Instead of saying a re- development plan, I would suggest an access plan for vehicle and pedestrian traffic be submitted for the proposed 3.595 acres. Take out the second sentence and leave the rest as is. Because we're really concerned with future access. I think those would be my suggestions. Our condition, one of our other concerns, and I agree with the Westermans and the Planning Commissioner: what we intended for 2A- 2, was an interior walkway system that the director could look at and review. Basically indicating some sort of pathway.system or walkway system between some of the parking stalls so you can get through, without having to go, and it would be a design that would be either raised or separated somehow. T think we'll be asking for that more and more on some'of the designs that we see. That was what was contemplated by that particular condition. COMMISSIONER SAPORTA Do I hear a motion? COMMISSIONER CASTILE I place that into a motion? COMMISSIONER HOLLAND I second it. UNIDENTIFIED Is that okay? UNIDENTIFIED Good for me, I can't complain. 38 B3 COMMISSIONER SAPORTA All those in favor? COMMISSIONER CASTILE Aye. COMMISSIONER HOLLAND Aye. COMMISSIONER MOORE Aye. C014MISSIONER SAPORTA Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHWEITZ Aye COMMISSIONER SAPORTA All opposed? It passes, except for conditional use. The conditional use said that the Planning Commission says deny conditional use. They still would be able to come back and apply for that. MR. BEWERSDORFF Might. t 39 8y 1111 MEMO EXHIBIT' G S A~ ~ . _ - ~ NOTICE OF PROPOSED AC:.110N Must be sent to DLCD 45 days prior to th. ~inal hc.,trxnq See OAR 660-18-020 Jurisdiction City of Tigard Date Mailed 9/27/93 Local File.Ntumber CPA 93-0009 ZC 93-0003 Date Set for F nal :icar.ing on Adoption November 23 1993 Month Day Year Time and Place for Hearing 7°30 P.m.,. City o T cAr'a - Tnwll Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , 'iii gAr ,--f1R 57222 Type of Proposed Action (Check all that apply) Comprehensive Land Use New Land Use X Plan Amendment Regulation Amendment __Regulation Please Complete (A) for Text Amendments and (B) for Map Amendments A_ Summary and Purpose of Proposed Action (Write a brief description of the'proposed action.' Avoid highly technical terms and stating "see attached".): A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zone change approval to redesignate eight acres of a twelve (12) Ar•re ~jtz ~sem medit~i~ high. density residential to Community Commerri Al And-te rediscfRate a 6.93 acre site from Neighborhood CQmmari•inl to mecii>~m high d~~s~t residential. Zone changes from R--25 Pn (nPRi,ientJa1 /aeeer P1anned Develpment) to C-G-(Community Commercial), and C-N~(Neighborhood commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) B_ For Map Amendments Fill Out the Following. (For each area to be changed, provide a separate sheet if necessary. Do not use tax lot number alone.): Current Plan Designatign Proposed Plan Designation: Medium-High Density Residential Community Commercial Neighborhood r~armana>;-eia' ensi y--7-esldential Current *Zone: Proposed Zone: R-25 PD Community Commercial L'=N -Medium-High nonce; t-~, ential Location: Southeast and Northeast guadraafic of thQ ink°~~ tion of SW Scholls Ferry Rd, and SW Walnut Strppt- Acreaqd lnvolved:. 14.93 Does this Change Include an Exception?.' .-Yes X _ No For Residential Changes Please Specify the Change. in Allowed Density in Units Per Uet. - Acire: Current Density: Proposed Density:* None None List Statewide Goals Which May Apply to the Proposal: 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12 List any State or Federal Agencies, Local. Government or Local Special Service Districts Whicia may be Interested i n or ir--ptied by the Proposal: None Victor Adonri Direct Questions and Comments To _City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (Phone) 639-4171.... Please H►ttacb-a Three (3) Copies of the Proposal to this Form and Mai 1 To Department of Land-Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street, N.E- Salem, Oregon 97310-6590 NOTE= If more copies of -this form are needed, please•contact the DLCD office at 373-0050, or this.form may be duplicated on green paper. . Please be advised that statutes require the "text" of a proposal to be provided. A.general description of the intended action is not sufficient.-Proposed plan and land use regulation amendments must be sent to DLCD at least 45 days prior to the final hearing (See OAR 660-18-020). FOR DLCD OFFICE USE DLCD File Number Days [Notice <pa>p roposedform - ~l - • • a t t ~tJ,~ of I,AURM N' t ~ CFA e 93-0009 r p ti 5 ~ A e % E S-10 . t\,\11\,~1 to , MYMMN 1.4 \~yAwp1U / Sw. Q~ u N4RS9 ` ICI u ~r" ` k ~ ~ ~~q. EANIDiT D Ss a - - <f ,f i F7. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) so. City of Tigard n ' , ) being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) c That I am a ~7i~f/~ I Il QL 7t~(7)STl~ for The City of Tigard, Oregon. 11 That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director _ ~-Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named pa_f~ons at the.,ao Tess shown o the attached list marked exhibit "H•" on the ==lb~ day of /~J .''~YYKKC' 19, said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as he 7P attached, was posted on an appropriate bulletin board on the day of _ X , 19 ; and depgpited , in the United States Mail on the day of -,7,EG, '7 , 19113 postage prepaid. Prepared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirm to me on the A day of , 19~„~. • NOTARY PURL OF 09EGON My Commission ExpiresZN~-Z ~O N O T I C E O F P U B L I C H E A R I N G NOTE: PUBLIC HEARING HAS SEEN RESCHEDULED TO 11/15/930 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, November 15, 1993 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CPA 93-0009/ZON 93-0003/SDR 93-0014/CUP 93-0002/MLP 93-0013 FILE TITLE: Albertson's Inc./Duncombe APPLICANT: Albertson's Inc. OWNER: Margery Crist 17001 NE San Rafael Rt. 1 Box 792 Portland, OR 97230 Beaverton, OR 97007 REQUEST: A request for the following development approvals: 1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to redesignate approximately eight acres of a 12 acre-parcel from Medium-high Density Residential to Community Commercial on tax lot 200 and to redesignate an approximately 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood Commercial to Medium-High Density Residential on tax lot 100. Zone changes. accompanying the above plan changes includes a zone change from R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 knits/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (Community Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) ; 2) Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 53,950 square foot multiple-use commercial retail building; 3) Conditional -Use approval to allow the construction of a 4,000 square foot gasoline station; 4) Minor Land Partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately eight acres and four acres each. LOCATION: Southeast and northeast quadrants of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Walnut Street.' (WCTM 2S1 4BB, tax lots 100 and 200) APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.4.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 12.1.3, 12.2.1, and 12.2.4; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, 18.56, 18. 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. rb f6ti~ THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF 'PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 639-4171, EXT. 356 (VOICE) OR 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO-MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN URITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE g/ A STAFF REPORT PRESS. aTION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPL .,rHE PUBLIC HEARING; AND ....a n..mu nn~r. awm r,YUTmmFN TRSTIMQNY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE 11VV I1G dJViii PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE: PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE. APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER October 26_1993 , ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM HE TIGARD CO:-;.•.L°;:IT: DEVE'_•OPMr-mml CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AD1D THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COr22ENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT ,SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER Victor Adonri AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 S-4 HALL BLVD. Es Ww' the City of T I GAP,D \ W. END IAORHI CPA 93-0009 3 33 w. -a~S RIM p90 POSAl- t: m S.W. Si ;e Ar t ~[Y EN31gti„ _ 3 S.W. HAR I ai 1 i S.W. WALNUT >T. w ~stet! 9.~ 2S104BB-03300 2S104BB- 300 • - i~ owe ~ .TM.Y:a ~aSDtR~7RY P`1,1TtTM9RTaTTAN a •••••••r• Dunn-nu-.L Wit.7 t2iY~:J' J vi: 743 6TH ST 7160 SW RD IM- M OSWEGO OR 97034 TIGARD 05t 23 :.2S104BB-a4700 _ .ROSEWOOD Eomii NC• • • , LZvnws . F s - 7140 SW 2097W . 743 6TH ST BZWvWdVN'ii 97007 L 0=1= OR 97035 2S104BB-04800 MATRIX DEVELOPMSNT RPORATION JY]G DBMo INC 7160 SW HAZ RD PO BOX 1633 97075, TIGARD OR 972 BSAVBC[4= .9 2S104BB-05000 2S104BB-05100. MATRIX DEVELOP OT CORPORATION MATRIX DE9EI.OP CORPORATION 7160 SW RD _ 71.60 Sid BAZEL RD - - TIGARD OR 9 223 TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-05200 2S104BB-05300/ MATRIX DEVZLOPMEN 'CORPORATION _ MATRIX DLVSLOPrI CORPORATION 7i6t~ SW ne~SZRD 73`0 TIGARD OR 972°i3 ' TIGARD OR 7223 2S104BB-05400 2S104BB-05500 PORTLAND -PAINTING~ INC MATRIX DEVELOP~CORPORATION °540 SE as CT 7160 SH Bp... x.23 RD PORTLAND OR 7236 TIGARD 97223 ` 2S3.04BB-05600 2S104BB-05700 MATRIX DEVELOP CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELOP CORPORATION RD HAZELVRgN 7160 Sid ~A.ZELFE RD 7160 SW TIGARD OR 97 3 TIGARD OR .54223 2S104BB-05800 2S104BB-05900 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT RPORATIO_N ~ JIL DEVSL7RS9r7 INC 7160 SW BAZELFERN PO BOX. 16TIGARD OR 9722 BEAVEYfO 075 2 S104BB-06000 2S104BB-06100. CORPORATION _ MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MATRIX DEVBLOF2RD 7160 SW HAZELFERN 7160 SW BAZ " TIGARD OR 97223 / TIGARD OR 9 0 2S1 04BB-06200 J 2S104BB-06300 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CO ORATION MATRIX DEVELOP NT CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZELFERN Ry' 7160 SW 8AZ RN RD TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD ()R 97223 x 2510500-00200 •.j~ 2S10500- :00 ' MORSE BROS, INC I MORSE BROS$ IT/ PG BOX 7 f y, M OAT 'l LEBANON OR 97355 LE!ANON 97355 2310500-01300 ......:..C,............ 2810500-01401 EVANS, ROBERT W i CHURCHILL, MARGARET A i 12745 • X2 NORMS ST 14664 MY SCROLLS PERRY RD POD OR 97230 BVSRTON OR 97007 2S304BC-01000 -00900 2SI04BC LUKER, DARLENE It ;PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 14285 SW FERN COMPANY TIGARD OR 97223 121• SR SAIGMON f . i ATTN:PRbOPERTY DEPARTMENT ) 2S104BB-00300 2S104BB-00400 SULLIVAN, TERRY C MATRIX DEVEWPI RATION 5300 PARKVIEW DR $2036 7160 SW RD LAKE OSWSGO OR 97035 TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-00500 2S104BB-00600 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPOR&TION MATRIX DEVELOP ,,N'r CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZELFSRN RD 7160 SW 33AZE'~.,RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD 0"7223 2S104BB-07700 2SI04BB-00800 MATRIX D;~~_ CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELOP9ENT CORPORATION- 7160 SW RD 7160 S W RD TIGARD OtRi 9223 - TIGARD OR 97223 :~S104BS-00900 2S104BB-01000 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELO CORPORATION 7160 SW EAZELFERN RD 7160 SW RD qZ&FERN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD 97223 _ 2S104BB-01100 2S'104BB-01200 ° MATRIX DEVELOPMENT. CORPORATION MATRIX D ~~PMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZEL RD 7160 SW YR ELFERN RD TIGARD OR 97 23 TIGARD R 97223 2S104BB-01300 2S104BB-01400 CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION _ MATRIX F9=7223f 71 60 SW HAZELFEI2N RD 7160 SW D TIGARD OR 223 TIGARD 2S104BB-01500 2S104BB-01600 MATRIX DEVELOP NT COPPORATION MATRIX DEVELOP7T CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZE zr~ RN RD 7160 SW LPERN RD TIGARD OR 7223 TIGARD 97223 ~r [AdMhk 2S104BB-06400 2S104BB- .500 ROSEWOOD HOMES INC POlt'LAM PAINTING, INC 9540 = OT-ED HiL .c CT r34u 5rr 209au ALOHA OR 97007 PORTLAND OR 97236 2SI04BB-06600 2S104BB-07200 MATRIX DEVEW CORPORATION .CHASAD LDBAVI F OREGON 7160 Std SAZ RD 14355 SW S 1rERR3C RD., TIasARD OR 9 223 R. 97007 2S104BB-07300 I: s ??r,'.: ••.:2S104BB-07300 ' KLICK CHABAD L4FBAVITC3 OF -OREGON T: VALLEY BANK.• 14355 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD Po BOX, 167. BEAVSRTON OR 97007 GOLDENDALB WA 98620 2S104BA-01400 2S104BA-01500 SHABASH mcu, MARAT/nmA FATBHI, EMIR X & CAROL L 13858 SW HINDON CT 13870 SW EMWN CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2SI04BA-01600 2S104BA-01700 ODELL, ROBERT M JR JOHNSON,'KENNETH C & CARLA C 13892 SW HINDON CT 13918 HINDON CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA-01800 2S104RA-01900 MOHR, JAMES BRIAN JR AND DRAGA, ROBERT F/CATHEJM L MICHELR ANNE 13901 SW HINDON CT 13923 SW HINDON COURT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA-02000 2S104BA-02100 STEELE, GEORGE E & PATRICIA R POLONE, DOMINICK/EMILY 0 - 13869 SW HINDON CT 225 STANFORD LANE TIGARD OR 97223 SEAL BEACH CA 90740 2S104BA=02200 2S104BR-02300 • WESTGATE, JOHN B AND GRETCHEN R RICKARD, DAVID A/MARGARET S 14670 SW 136TH PLACE 12061 Stud WILTON AVE TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2SI04BA-02400• 2S104BA•-02500 KLE::N, STEVEN A AND KICKNER,• ROBERT L & MARILYN D MARGARET LYNN 33874 SW CRIST CT 12049 SW WILTON AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA-02600 2SI04BA.-02700 LAMERS, BILL M AND DEBBIE L PHILLIPS, JOHN F & KRISTI A 13916 SW GRIST CT 10275 SW GULL PL TIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 l~ 2S204BB-01700• 2S104BB- 300 PBiTRYJL DEVEIAP,d~N: CORPORATION MFoTRI$ DBVSLOPMENx CORPORATION 7160 SW 8A2/ F'9722.RN RD 7160 SF/ RD R 223 TIGARD 0X//97223 TIGAIdD OR 23 2SI04BB-61900 2S104BB-02000 . MATRIX DEVELOP CORPORATION DURA-BUILT CONSTRUCTION INC 7160 SW RD 743 62S ST 2S104BB-02100 'i 2S1o4B8-92200 GARY REED DEVELOPMENT INC JIL DEVSLO INC 4420 SW POMONA - _ PO BOX 1633 PORTLAND OR 9'7219 BEAVERS 97075 2SI04BB-•02300 2SI04BB-02400 . JIL DEVELOPMENT INC MATRIX DEVELO PNM2 CORPORATION .XZ O BOX. 1633 7160 SW RD BEAVERT'ON OR 97075• TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-02500 2S104BB-02600 MATRIX DSVffiAPMBNT RPORATI02d MATRIX DEVELOP reCORrvFcaTl®N 7160 SW HAZ RD 7160 SW RD , TIGARD OR 97234 TIGARD OR 223 2S104BB-02800 2S104BB-02900 MATRIX DEVELOPMEWZ116RPORATION MATRIX RIX DE9~^P.~...N°' •~~ORATION............ 7160 SW HAZELPElRD 7160 SW BAZEI.FS RD TIGARD OR 97 3 TIGARD OR 97,..3 2S104BB-03000 2S104BB-03100 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT RPORATION - MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZELPERN 7160 SW TIGARD OR 9722 TIGARD OR 972 2S104BB-03200 2S104BB=03300 MATRIX DEVgIAPMENT.CORPORATION MATRIX DEVELOPMENT ,CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZELFERN_ 7160 SW HAZ RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 972 23104BB-03400 2S104BB-03500 MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CO RATION PORTLAND PAINT , INC 7160 SW HAZELFER2d AD 9540 SE WOOD HILLS CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLA14D O 97236 2S104BB-03600 2S104BB-03700 MATRIX DEVELOPMEYT CORPORATION. KENYON, TOM 7160 SW HAZELF',,ERN RD BY YODNIQUE HOMES TIGARD OR 9Va423 PO BOX 2016 LAKE GROVE OR 9703§ 9 Q' 2S10480-03200 1S233CD 7)03 CRIST, MARGERY T'/J081d R TR1 SIZES. WOODSIDE VILLAGE LTD PTNSHP ' 159SO Sid DEERMMST LN BY JEFFREY HF~R BEAVERTON OR 97007 222 SW CGLUMBrA 91800 PORTLAND OR 97201 IS233C.D•-08600 253336-08700 BROOR.s, TOBY AND HXLLER, 20TTBEW S AND ILENE R BOOXPM, HADLYN F 13887 SW CRIsT CT 2260 P=4 ZZU-m- fails W7L ° HnLS OH 44094 . _2S133SD-08800 - - 1S133CD-08900 PERRY, R.ICHWW J & LISA H SORB, Lamm D%CHRSSTnm i 13865 SW CR3.ST CT 32027 SW WILTON AVE ~ 22GAM OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 , 353.33CC-00300 1513300-00400 CLARK, GEORGE V AND MArtGUERTTZ IL HOPFERe mum= H & mmum= D 070 TRUS72 S 14190 SW SCROLLS Pr RD 381 OAE LEAF DRIVE TIGARD OR.- 97223 EUGENE OR 97404 ls3.320ui-00300 0~FiIG PETRIE C,O NSIVE DEVELOPHWr 00, IN - 9600 SW CAPITOL EUY % GGS (HI) 3NC . PORTLAND OR 97219 201 2NT STREET . CITY F331ANC.IAL TOWER #904 HONOLULU HT 96813 DON DLR400MBE ALBERTSON' S INC . 17001 NK SAN RAFAEL PORTLAND OR 9723- MARGERY CRIST RT 3. BOY: 792 - BEAVERTON * OR 97007 JOHN SHONKWILER, PC 13425 SW 72M AVE _ TIGARD OR 97223 ITTF SON & ASSOC INC 610 SW ALDER S-700 PORTLAND 'OR 97205 q7 NEES= MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Co mni-ac 1 n"e== FROM: J ~PT~y 1t.tr~Tffer, Development Review Planner DATE: December 9, 1991 SUBJECT: Albertsons/Crist CPA 91-03/ZON 91-08 On November 4, 1991, the Commission continued the hearing for the Albertsons Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change to December 16, 1991 to allow the staff and the property owners to attempt to resol-.e the issue of exactly how much C-N designated area presently exists on the subject site. Since that time, Mike Robinson, of the' City attorneys office, and Garry McMurray, an attorney representing the property owners, have both spent a substantial amount of time reviewing the case law aid statutes pertinent to determination of a Plan and zoning boundary. There is still disagreement at this time with regard to the current acreage of the portion. of the site that is zoned C-N. It appears that this issue will' need to be determined by either the City Council or a court. The applicants; a?bertsors, have submitted an addendum to the traffic study which is intended to provide alternative findings to those previously submitted in the traffic study. These alternative findings are intended to reflect the existing situation if it is found that there are currently only 5.0 acres of C-N zoning on the subject property. At this point, staff recommends that the Commission should not try to decide the C-N area issue. This issue: can best be determined by the City Council or a court, if necessary, prior to the Council taking final action on the current application. Instead the Commission should focus on the Albertsons Plan/Zone change request: 1. Change the existing Commercial Professional/C-N Plan and zoning designations on the north side of the SW Walnut Street extension to Medium-High Density Residential/ R-25 Plan and zoning designations; 2. Change 8 acres of Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 Plan and zoning designations to General Commercial/C-G at the southeastern corner of SW Scholls Ferry and the future Walnut extension; and 3. Possibly increasing residential Plan and zoning densities on either the.. north side of Walnut or south of the commercial site to High Density Residential/R-40. 9~ MINE MME 7 The staff recommendation with regard to the Albertsons application remains the same as was presented in the staff report for the November 4th hearing, except with regard to any action on the size of the current C-N zoned area. Staff '.s recommendation therefore 1. Deny the applicants' request for redesignation of a portion of tax lat 100 to t'.e = cral Cc^=ercia? P designation and C-N zoning district. Deny the applicants, request for•redesignation of any portion of tax lot 100 with either the Medium-High Density Residential or High Density Residential Plan designations and R-25 or R-40 zoning districts. 2. Direct staff to work with the current applicants, the applicants for recently denied or withdrawn applications to commercial designations, all NPOs in the City, and other interested parties cn the development of new Plan and zoning designations patterned loosely upon tie' applicants, discussion of a community commercial zone. Attached are the Albertsons traffic study addendum, a memorandum from Cal Woolery of NPO #7, and a letter from marlin and Marilyn Hopfer. If you do not still have the November 4th packet for CPA 91-03/ZON 91-06, please let me know and I will have it copier. q9 MENEM_ qI ecel vet eliq * y C. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSON'S APPLICATION ) File No.s CPA 93-009, ) APPLICANT'S ADDITIONAL 20N 93-003, SDR 93-0014, ) TESTIMONY and EVIDENCE CUP 93-002, and MLP 93--013 ) 0 1. INTRODUCTION At the December 14, 1993, City Council hearing on the Albertsons' application, representatives of Matt Marcott and Marcott Thriftway grocery store (hereinafter "Thriftway") appeared and submitted a large volume of oral and written testimony. Albertsons' Additional Testimony will respond to each of the issues raised by Thriftway. In addition, Albertsons shall set forth the evidence and arguments for the objections to standing and expansion of the record for review that were raised at the city council public hearing. II. OBJECTIONS TO STANDING AND EiPANSION OF THE RECORD FOR REVIEW A. The Proper Record for Review The proposed zoning map and comprehensive plan map amendments, as well as the other applications, are quasi- judicial proceedings and can be heard concurrently. CDC 18.32.090(c) (3) and (6) . Under CDC 18.22.030 (3) , the Planning commission is required to make a recommendation to the City Council on this application. The City council: "shall decide the application on the record as provided by Section 18.32.320(b)." CDC 18.22.030(3) [Emphasis added]. The code under Section 18.32.320 then requires that the City Council's review of the Planning Commission decision [the "recommendation" identified in CDC 18.22.030(3)] be restricted to only the record that was before the Planning Commission. No new evidence may be considered. "CDC 18.32.320(b). The review of a decision by the Commission or Hearings Officer by the Council, shall be: (1) Confined to the record of the proceedings as provided in Section 18.32.320 of this Code and each member of the Reviewing Body shall be provided with a transcript of the proceeding on Appeal." 1 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JMS\ALBERTSON\TESTIMONY) The Albertsons' Application is a City C;ouricil review of a Planning Commission public hearing where a record was established. In contrast, CDC 18.32.320(a) provides for City Council de novo review of Director decisions because there was no public hearing or formal, record involved. Thus, limiting the City Council review of the Planning commission decision to the Planning Commission record makes sense, follows the clear regzi remer_ts of the Code and is consistent with the review system set out in the Code. Restricting the record is also consistent with the instruction the Planning Commission Chairman made at the Planning commission hearing. He identified this record and standing limitation. E. Evidence submitted by Thriftway or any person after the Planning Commission closed the record must be rejected As stated above, the record must be 'limited to the Planning Commission record. The evidence submitted by Thriftway and others on December 14, 1993, before the City Council violates CDC 18:32.320(b)(1). In addition, CDC 18.32.320(b) (3) requires that any written argument submitted to the City Council on this review must be given to the City Council not less than five (5) days prior to council consideration. Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Winterowd submitted written argument to the City Council for the first time on December 14, 1993. The written testimony even states at page 13 of Mr. Sullivan's memorandum that it is dated December 14, 1993. No material was submitted five (5) or more days prior to the City Council. Thus, all written testimony of Thriftway and others at the December 14, 1993 hearing must be rejected and not considered for final deliberation on the Albertsons' application. CDC 18.32.320(b)(1) and (3), C. Thriftway and certain other persons at the December 14, 1993 City Council hearing lack standing to remonstrate or submit evidence On City Council review of quasi-judicial decisions of the Planning Commission the only person having standing to appear before the City Council to give testimony and/or present evidence are person(s) who: (1) appeared earlier before the Planning Commission (orally or in writing) and (2) were entitled to notice or their interests were aggrieved. CDC 18.32.290(b) restricts standing before the City Council in this application review as follows: 11(b) In the case of a decision by the Hearings Officer of the Planning Commission, except for a decision on an 2 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JOWBERTSONVESTIMONY) for F Aml.a appeal of a Director's decision, any person shall be gms-i.dgred a party to a matter, thus having "standing" to seek review provided: (1) The person appeared before the Planning Commission or hearings Officer orally or in writing; and (Emphasis added). The only persons who appeared before the Planning ' Commission are representatives of Albertsons (the applicant), Craig Petrie, Scott Russell, and Mr. and Mrs. Westermann (who live more the 250' from the site). Thriftway and all other persons who appeared before the City Council on December 14, 1993, and thereafter, lack standing to remonstrate or present evidence on the Albertsons application review. None of these parties appeared before the Planning Commission. Pursuant to CDC 18.32.320 and 18.32.290(b), the City Council must exclude all oral and written comments by Thriftway and 'the other parties that did not appear before the Planning Commission. D. Restriction on standing and the record are valid and the notice provided is valid The City is entitled, by ordinance, to limit its review of Planning Commission public hearing decisions to the record and parties that were before the Planning Commission. See, Menges v. Board of Jackson County. 290 Or. 251, 621 P.2d 562 (1980). Notice was provided for the Planning Commission hearing that satisfied the City Code's requirements. The City Staff affidavit identifies that these notice requirements were met. See, Exhibit "A." Further, the notice provided by the City satisfies the state law requirement of notice mailed to the "owners of record of property (within 100 feet) on the most recent property tax assessment roll" ORS 197.763(2)(a). Here the notice was actually given to owners within 250' from the site and far exceeds state law. Given the notice sent by the City satisfies both the Code and ORS 197.763(2)(a), the City's decision cannot be overturned for lack of notice received. ORS 197.763(8) provides: "The failure of the property owner to receive notice as provided in this section shall not invalidate such proceedings if the local government can demonstrate by affidavit that such notice was given. The notice provisions of this section shall not restrict the giving of notice by other means, including posting, newspaper publication . . (Emphasis added). In addition, adequate notice was posted on both the (8) acre property south of Walnut Street, and the 6.93 acre parcel north of Walnut Street. See Exhibit "D" and "G" of the Application. The notice was also posted on the City Hall 3 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JNS\ALBERTS0N\TESTIN0NY) za bulletin board. Exhibit "A." Thriftway asserts, at page 1 of their Memorandum that a Goal 1 (citizen involvement) violation has occurred since no . CIT meeting was held on the Albertsons' application prior to the rlanning Commission hearing. This position has no legal basis. First, January 6, 1993, Albertsons p esenta~d its proposal for CC zoning, site development review and related applications concept during a scheduled KPO-7 meeting. See Exhibit "B". The NPO members suggested several changes that were incorporated in a revised plan that was represented to the NPO-7 on February 3, 1993. Actually, a single NPO review meeting was sufficient to meet any Goal 1 requirements. Thereafter, NPO-7 was disbanded and no new CIT was formed until after Albertsons filed its application. However, prior to the filing of the application, the plans were submitted to the neighborhood's review (properties within 2501) in accordance with the City's new ordinance. See Application at pages 3 - 4 and Exhibits "D", "E" and "F". In essence, the duly formed NPO reviewed the CC zoning and plan concepts prior to application filing. Property owners and residents within of the subject property were given written notice at least twice: (1) by Applicant on July 20, 1993, (notice sent to over 300' from site), and (2) by the City for the Planning Commission hearing held on November 15, 1993. All notice requirements have been met and exceeded. E. Alternative Findings In their testimony and submittal documents, Thriftway strongly indicated that if Albertsons' grocery store is approved, they intend to appeal the City's approval to LUBA.' I believe it is not to Albertsons' nor the City's best interests to have this application subjected to two separate 1. Indeed, Mr Marcotts' sister (Pam Garcia) admitted in her testimony that the Marcott Thriftway in Beaverton was "not a booming business." Her family's principal concern and objection was that an approved Albertson's grocery store would "severely impact" their Thriftway store. In essence, Thriftway's sole reason to oppose this application and to file an appeal is to prevent or delay competition by Albertsons. The attorney for Thriftway has used a "shot gun" approach of listing a lengthy number of planning allegations merely to cloud and enable the real purpose of his client, i.e., to appeal for purposes of delaying competition by Albertsons. Apparently, Thriftway has determined that the cost of attorneys fees on appeal are less than the losses in profit from competition for the same period. Ask 4 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE i (JWSWBERTSONVESTIMONY) appeal processes when all the issues can be consolidated into just one appeal.2 To avoid a needless double round of appeals, the City Council could adopt alternative findings: 1. A finding that the City Code restricts City Council, review on this application to ijie Planning- commi S51 on record; and that Thriftway and other certain persons lack standing to appear before the City Council. 2. A finding that the City recognizes the likelihood of an appeal by Thriftway, and therefore adopts an alternative set of findings in the event the appellate process ultimately rejects the City's decision on the scope of the record and standing. This alternative set of findings would reflect the City's full consideration of all the oral and written testimony submitted by Thriftway and the other parties (without record and standing restrictions). By adoption of this alternative findings approach, the city preserves its right on appeal to apply the language of its Code and raise issues of record and standing restrictions. If the appellate court disagrees on these code interpretations, then review proceeds on the expanded record. Only one appeal process is created. This is the most practical and cost-time efficient approach to take. The Applicant requests that the City Council interpret the pertinent Code provisions as Applicant has identified in the preceding section of this memorandum. Then, Applicant requests that the City conditionally accept an expanded record and adopt separate alternative findings in approving this application. 2 The City would decide that its Code restricts the City Council's review to -the Planning commission record, and that Thriftway and certain other persons lack standing. Thriftway would undoubtedly appeal that decision. If LUBA then disagreed with the City's interpretation of its own Code, then the matter would be remanded for the City to consider the new evidence that was submitted to City Council on December 14, 1993 and thereafter. If the City on the second hearing process still decided to approve the application, then Thriftway would appeal on all the evidentiary issues raised by them. Thus creating second round of appeals on the same case. 5 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JYS\ALBERTSON\TESTIMONY) (o ~ Y rar_s_sTEROND PIA1 KING SERVICES B 71 III. RESPONSE TO ISSUES RFe.a.SE.. P - A. Scale and Location (page „2 'of Winterowd Report) Thriftway asserts that the application is "indifferent to the needs of pedestrians" and is a "strip mail" in violation of the Community Commercial (CC) purposes section. Thriftway is iw o~-,-cr_ 1. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access The site development plan provides for sidewalks on three sides of the site, with two sidewalk access points on the forth side (south-side) if the site. Pedestrian and bicycle access have been evaluated in the context of where the population densities are located near the site. High density residential development will be located on 6.97 acres across Walnut Street to the north, 3.95 acres to the south and in excess of 50 acres to the west. Sidewalks along Scholls Ferry and Walnut provide excellent pedestrian and bicycle access from the multi- family areas to the north and west. The intersection of Walnut - Scholls Ferry Road and Northview Road - Walnut Street will provide pedestrian cross lanes and are direct pedestrian flow points from the multi-family areas. Sidewalk access to the 3.95 acre multi-family area to the south are along the Scholls Ferry sidewalk and the 40 Northview sidewalk. A lesser density single family residential development exists east of the site along Northview Drive. The Application calls for a sidewalk access along Northview Drive with a ramp (also suitable for handicap access) leading down from Northview Drive into the site. Also, the Planning Commission made a condition of approval that a direct staircase access be provided to the intersection of Northview Drive and S.W. Stardust from the site. The Planning Commission also made as a condition of approval the requirement of special pedestrian access ways be added for crossing the parking lot area. These are all incorporated in the revised site development plan presented to the City Council. In addition, the two building pads are located at the corners of the property where two sidewalks connect. The larger building at the rear of the property will be served by the sidewalks along Northview Drive and Scholls Ferry Road, the ramp near Northview Drive and the internal parking lot pedestrian ways. In all, there are at least 6 separate pedestrian and bicycle access points for the site. See Exhibits "C" at 1 and 5 attached hereto. 6 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JOWBERTSOMTEST I MONY ) ~o r 2. "strip Mall'l 7ml Thriftway has purposely misread the comprehensive plan text. The text does not disparage "inalls," but instead, seeks to avoid "typical commercial strip development." The typical "strip development" referred to in the text reflects the spreading of a narrow commercial strip along a major traffic roadway. This "strip development" haS typically and historically been earmarked for restriction by planners and cities. The provision of a large, generally square or rectangular, parcel of land for a commercial complex, such as shopping center, is considered the opposite of "strip development." See, Anderson, American Law of Zoning, in Exhibit "D." Furthermore, the CC zone requires a separation of at least k mile between a CC zoned parcel and another retail commercial site. Along with the requirement of a parcel w size of 2 - 8 acres, the CC requirements have legislatively precluded "strip development." This is the implementation of the stated purpose of the CC concept. Here, there is no retail commercial site or zoning within i mile of the site. Further, the subject property for CC zoning is 8 acres in size. The legislative elements to prevent "strip development" are complied with by this application. R. Permitted Uses (page 2 of winterowd Report) Thriftway wrongfully asserts that the 40,000 sq.ft. Albertsons' grocery store is a "super" store and serves a two- mile regional market area; and that the video stare is not general retail sales. Exhibit "E" attached hereto identifies the grocery stores in the area. The stores range from 11,000 sq.ft. to 55,000 square feet and are all referred to as "supermarkets." Actual "super" stores are CubFoods, Costco and alike, and generally are 100,000 sq.ft. in size. This list identifies that the proposed 40,000 Albertsons will be the smallest for Albertsons and 28% smaller than the larger grocery stores. In fact, the proposed Albertsons will be _ smaller than Matt Marcott's 43,500 sq.ft. Murrayhill Thriftway store. The Albertsons 40,000 sq. ft. trade area for this location is a 14 mile radius not a 2 mile radius. This is because a 1k mile radius circle of this site inventories 14,300 residents with a population projection of 19,200 by 1995. See, the Application at 9 where Albertsons study was based upon U.S. census tract and Population and Census Center figures. Albertsons° own market study establishes that this "mid-range" 7 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JWS\ALBERTSON\TESTIMONY) I D !o INS 40,000 sq.ft. store requires an 8 - 9,000 population range. The standard in the market. is 5 sq.ft. per person. See Exhibi "G." A 40,000 sq.ft. grocery store, therefore needs 8,000 or more population for its trade area. Thus] the residential density near this site far exceeds (withiln ? mile radius) the minimum population a 40,000 sq.ft. store requires. See also,. Exhibit "L" which identifies that the actual grocery stores existing in the metropolitan area (including 40,000 sarcr. ft a or greater storesN generally •Fnl I t%T.r ~ "=+-4-o -f a 1 t.^ i mile trade area separation. In addition, the City staff completed a zoning designation inventory of this 1k mile radius and found that the density is 15 dwelling units per acre. This equates to a maximum build out of 9,600 units or approximately 25,000 people. In essence, a 1k mile area already includes existing population to support a 40,000 sq.ft. store. Both projected census growth and the allowable zoning densities for tY.=s area provide for even greater surplus of population than a 40,000 sq.ft. store requires. The 5,950 sq.ft. video store is allowed under the new CC zoning. Thriftway has again purposely misread both the Comprehensive Plan and zoning provisions in asserting that a video store is limited to 5,000 sq.ft. First, the Comprehensive Plan policy [12.2.1.4.a(2)] referring to "other commercial sales and service facilities" more specifically identifies these uses in the implementing zoning ordinance at CDC 18.61.030A(2). These 5,000 sq.ft. uses are identified as: animal sales and services, consumer repair services, convenience sales and personal services, day care, eating and drinking facilities, and participant indoor sport. All of these businesses commonly have in the market place a 5,000 sq.ft. space or less. In reviewing the Application requests the City staff did not find that a video store should be in another category besides "general retail sales." The City has, as a policy, interpreted the term "general retail sales" to include video stores where video stores were approved in the General Commercial Districts (C-G). Further, the market place at the time the CC zoning and plan amendments were adopted had already established that new video stores customarily (if not always) exceeded 5,000 sq.ft. in size. Video stores, today, are businesses that engage in general retail sales. See Exhibit "F." These retail sales range from video tapes and equipment to sales of clothing merchandise and concessionaire foods (popcorn, candy, soda, etc.). The City is entitled to recognize that the new CC zone incorporated the common form and size of video stores that are found in the market place today. Such an interpretation would 8 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JWS\AL8ERTS0N\TESTIM0NV) ID f 111''M I OR be reasonable. Clark v. Jackson County. 313 or- 508; 836 P.2d 710 (1992). C. Location Criteria (page 3 of Ninterowd Reportl LN Size o-' site - 8 acres_ The site acreage size is appropriate. The Community Commercial uses proposed for the site, and previously identified as needed by NPO-7, total 57,550 sq.ft. in size. This is a mid--range CC center or 57.5% of the maximum sq. footage allowed. This is not a "power strip mall" as described by Thriftway, but is referred to in the planning field as a "neighborhood shopping center." See, Exhibit "C" at 1. Adding the required parking, the build out area is less than 6 acres.. The 8 acre site is necessary to provide for the ability to excavate the center into the slope at the site. This enables the center to avoid obstructing views and screen light and activities on the site. Due -to this extensive excavation, large landscaped slopes will be created on the eastern and southern boundaries causing approximately 25% of the site to be used for slopes and landscaping. The full 8 acre site is needed for this low adverse impact designed center. 2. Parking regmirements The proposed site development plan does not provide "excess parking." The parking provided meets the requirements of the code. See, Exhibit "C" at 4. 3. other potential sites There are four potential sites identified in the City planning staff's inventory that satisfy all the locational criteria for siting of a CC zone. See Application at 9 - 10 and Application Exhibit ''I." The Applicant's site is the prime site located generally in the center of the four sites (in the actual center of the three sites that are either inside the City or immediately adjacent to the City). The Applicant's site is one of only two sites that are actually inside the city to serve immediate City needs for CC zoning functions. The Applicant's site also possesses the highest planning and built out densities within , mile of all sites. See Application at 10. As all other potential sites are either 50% or 20% less in planned density than the Application site, the Applicant's site best satisfies the locational and trade area density requirements of CC zoning. The Applicant's 9 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JWSWBERTSONVESTIMONY) I iO~ 19 INS1111 In site is also generally located within the center of all these sites, thus, providing the most logical location for a commercial center. Centering the location takes best advantage of encouraging pedestrian and bicycle or transportation alternatives, and diminishes the need for cross-town or cross-area automobile traffic to and from the shopping center. Finally, the other two sites (at Sunrise Lane and the intersection of old and new Scholls Ferry Roads) are outside the City and cannot readily provide immediate CC functions for the City. The fourth site at 135th and Scholls. Ferry has severe development restrictions due to existing wetlands. 4. Proposal to shift Applicant' main building 90° Thriftway's proposal is unworkable, prevents effective function of a commercial center and creates violations of numerous CC zoning standards and policies. Briefly, orientation to Northview Road would require that little excavation occur, thus causing the building to rise at 25 to 30 feet above Northview Drive. This design would place the worst adverse impact on the single family residential to the east. Also, this orientation would focus the site on the least residential density, rather than the highest (multi-family) density to the north and west - contrary to the avowed purposes of the CC zone to serve at least 8 units per acre areas. This reorientation would also adversely impact pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the highest sources of such traffic - the north and west high density multi-family areas. Finally, the reorientation would preclude all "effective" ways to buffer the profile of the buildings, isolate the loading dock area and truck turn-around, and the noise generated by such activities. See also, Exhibit "C" at 5. The Applicant's design best serves all the policies, standards and guidelines set fourth in the CC plan and the Code provisions. D. Site Development Review (page 4 of Winterowd Report) Thriftway cites the Comprehensive Plan provision under 12.2.1.4.b.4, but fails to make any specific claims of non compliance. Full compliance is however addressed by the Applicant at 12 - 16 of the Application. 10 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JNS\AL8ERTS0N\TEST1M0NY) D rol E. Site History - IlMistake" Issue (page 4 of Winterowd Report) Thriftway asserts that the only "mistake" made in the rezoning of the subject property's Neighborhood Commercial (C- N) zone was its size. Thriftway's evaluation. effectively, ignores that the City Council's latest final order establishes that the C-N zone-north of Walnut is now 6.97 acres in size. See Application at 6 - 8 and Application Exhibits 11A-3 to A- 4.11 Thriftway's reliance on comments by a city staff member is misplaced. It is the City Council's final orders that determine the status of the existing zoning. After the staff member's comments, Attorney Garry McMurry submitted to the City a legal memorandum setting forth the history of the changes concluding that current zoning is now almost 7 acres of C-N. See Exhibit "H." Thereafter, the city staff no longer asserted the previous staff member's comments, and that staff member is no longer employed by the City. The fundamental differences between site size for C-N (a maximm-m of 2 acres) and the actual size (5.97 acres) is a significant mistake, along with the corresponding mistake in trade areas. Applicant has also identified that the permitted uses in the original Washington County NC zone before annexation were far greater than the City's subsequently Aft, applied C-N zone - a 92% reduction. See, Application at 6 - 8. Thriftway tries to "white-wash" this massive down-zoning by asserting that the City did what is was supposed to do - apply the "closest corresponding plan designation." However, no designation was even "close." What the City needed to do was adopt a mid-range commercial zone like "CC" and apply it to this site. Adopting "CC" zoning for this site today will correct that original mistake. F. Uses (page 7 of Winterowd Report) Thriftway asserts the video store in not "general retail sales." See response to the issue in Section III B, herein. G. Building Design Guideline i.a. (page 8 of Winterowd Report Thriftway again intentionally mislabels the Applicant's CC site plan as a "strip or power shopping center." As identified above in Section III A(2), the CC zone does not discourage shopping centers or malls. The "strip development"' to avoid is a long narrow commercial strip along a major roadway. The Application's plan is not "strip development" 11 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JMALBERTSON\TESTIMONY) ~1rr , I M 111 di and the locational criteria in the CC plan and code prevent strip development. See also, Exhibit 11C11 at 1. Thriftway then fabricates characteristics of a "strip mai_1_11 by 1 1 C -Y Tr. Ocr ax _ located c.sasu~+J.-=. at intersections of arterials and collector streets, having a large "anchor" supermarket, having loading areas secluded behind a building, large parkin- areas and restaurant pads near streets. Unfortunately, Thriftway does not seem to realize that each of these items are listed as either required locational criteria or outright permitted uses in the City's CC zone and plan. In essence, Thriftway is trying to convince the City that the type of shopping center specifically contemplated (and indeed required) by the City's "CC" zoning should not be permitted. This is such a frivolous assertion that the City Council should interpret the argument as really stating: "please do not approve an Albertson's grocery store that will compete with my Thriftway store." On the issue of uniqueness in design and function, the Application provides several unique features. The center is mid-range in density (57.5% of what zoning would allow). This is in direct response to requests on size by the neighborhood association. The mini-park and restaurant featured at the corner of Walnut and Scholls Ferry, with walkway, seating and public meeting functions is completely ignored by the Thriftway analysis. Utilization of less than 6 acres of the site for the use so that approximately 25% will incorporate landscaping and excavated slopes is unique. The extreme _ excavation of the site and the "tucking" in of the main building below the elevation of nearby residential areas to preserve views and buffer noise, etc., is unique to all shopping centers (let alone only a mid-range shopping center). See also, Exhibit "C:" at 4 for.distinctive or unique design features. H. Building Design Guidelines l.b. (page 9 of Yliinterowd Report) Thriftway ignores the Application's declared element of the site development plan that all buildings shall incorporate the same or similar architectural elements identified in the "model" design of the grocery store. Application at 19 - 20. Exhibit "C" further identifies and illustrates these unifying architectural elements. An exhibit showing material types (brick, stone, etc.) and colors was entered into evidence at { the Planning Commission hearing. As stated by the Application, these materials and colors will be incorporated in all buildings at the site. Unity of design is assured. In addition, this and all "guidelines" are suggested ideas and not mandatory standards (unless specifically 12 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JWS\ALBERTSON\TESTIMONY) 111 required by the. City Council). The Applicant has addressed each of them, and has provided either models or site Plan r__ _ -_1.:_... f:,i u,eiLVi.ul compliance with all the guidelines. Finally, the Applicant has provided model building, landscaping and signage plans (designated to be uniform throughout the site) . These plans and models satisfy the code requirements. The Planning Commission has recommended as a condition of approval that the landscape plan be competed by subsequent identification of the types of plants that will be used. The types and sizes of plants are specifically listed and limited in the Code. Provision of this information is an appropriate subject for a condition of approval. The submitted landscape plan design adequately illustrates plant locations and relationship to buildings, parking areas, pedestrian movements and buffered boundaries. : D 1 ~U + a. n.., Ae7Kidel;r®a 1 _ C. (Aa~c@ 10 Of [91Y1t@r04Pd i • J.41ra4 Design V` _ ReROrt Thriftway asserts that all building drawings are required, public entrances and windows are required on the back walls of the grocery store, and it will take years for landscaping to "hide" the main building's south and west (he meant "east") walls. The Code does not "require" a final design for each mom building. The Code provision is only a guideline and uses the word "should." The guideline is, however, satisfied by the Application. Albertsons has provided building designs of their building to act as a model for the architectural and design elements that will be incorporated in each building. This included an exhibit at the hearing as to building and roof materials and colors. See also, Exhibit 11C.11 The Code allows this "model" approach to illustrate unity of style and design. No public entrances and windows are required on the south and east sides of the grocery store (back sides). Again, the guidelines are discretionary. The purpose of this guideline is to encourage entrances and windows on building walls that actually "face" or are visible from a nearby street. None exist for those two walls. The building is to be excavated out of the hill and these walls do not "face" a street, but "face" a landscaped steep slope that is as high or higher than the building. These building sides cannot be seen nor provide any physically possible access to Northview Drive. Thus, doors and windows would provide no "visual" purpose or function. The landscaping will screen, the main building and the rest of the site almost immediately. The east and south 13 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JUS\ALBERT$0N\TESTJH0NY) I1~ Pill! slopes of the site will be planted with "evergreen" trees. The City Code requires that these be planted at relatively close spacings and have at least a 2' caliber trunk size. Trees meeting this requirement are usually 10 -15 feet tall and provide an almost immediate sight buffer or screen. The height of these trees on the top of the slopes will exceed and screen the building height. j. General Site Design Guidelines 2.a. (page 11 of Winterowd Report Thriftway again tries tc misrepresent a "guideline" as a mandatory requirement, thereby requiring the entire building layout to be reoriented on the site. Here, the issue is the loading area. The Applicant's plan has the loading area (as specifically requested by NPO-7) located in a isolated "valley" behind the main building. The building blocks all access, views and noise of the loading area from the entire shopping center to the north. The southern side of the loading area is "blocked" from view and access by a steep landscaped slope that is higher than the main building. Thus in compliance with the guideline, the loading area does not "face" toward a residential use. It faces toward a steep landscaped slope that screens the loading area from future residential development to the south. See also, Exhibit "C." Thriftway's proposed "alternative design" would expose the loading area to direct residential visibility on at least three sides (south, west and north). This is because the proposed "alternative design" would elevate the building to approximately the level of Northview Drive. This "alternative design10 would adversely impact nearby residences by exposing them to all the building view obstruction, noise, light, loading area activity and traffic movements. Contrary to Thriftway's assertions, the 3.95 acre multi- family property to the immediate south can be easily developed as zoned. The parcel widths do not pose a significant problem and access is readily available from Northview Drive. See Exhibit "C" and "J." Finally, the parking planned for the site is not excessive. See response at Section III C(2) above. Also, Thriftway misinterprets the Planning commission denial of the gas station.. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the gas station as a conditional, use. It did not eliminate the "pad" for a building. Instead, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the "alternative" uses that the Applicant requested for this "pad." 14 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JIBS\ALSERTSON\TESTIMONY) P R. internal Walkways (page 13 -14 of Winterowd Regoort) `a Plannina Commission added as a condition of approval .L;ta~ that specific internal walkways and external access points (and their locations) be required and added to the ~'an. This addition satisfied the Codes' requirements. The Applicant submitted a revised plan to the City Council that complied with this condition of approval. Thri€tway's argument has no merit. See also, Exhibit "C" for a discussion of internal walkways and pedestrian - bicycle accesses. L. Other Site Development Standards (page 14 -17 of Winterowd Report) A lighting plan is not required by the CC Code for approval. This standard is specific as to what is required. No discretion is involved for subsequent compliances as a condition of approval. However, the Applicant is providing a "model" design of the lighting fixtures that will be used to show compliance is not only feasible, but assured. See, Exhibit 11C" at 9. Mechanical equipment screening on building roofs and elsee:here is addressed in the Application at 21. In addition, a "model" design of the screening is provided in Exhibit "C" at 10 and 11 to illustrate the screening that will be used throughout the site. This "model" is consistent with the design characteristics required on all buildings at the site. Refuse and recycling container structures are described in Exhibit "C" at 11 and includes a "model" of the design that will be used throughout the site. Bicycle racks are also discussed in Exhibit "C" at 12 and identification of their locations are given. The Code requirements are complied with. Again, the standard has specific requirements and is the proper subject for a condition of approval. Pedestrian and vehicular movement conflicts have been minimized by the parking area design. The landscaping design plantings emphasizes the major points of access to and within the site. The buildings are located to facilitate safe and comfortable pedestrian movements. See, Exhibit 11C.11 . Site features (fences, walls, etc.) are designed to be consistent with the scale and architectural design of the primary structures and contribute to pedestrian movement. Brick fences proposed at the perimeters of the site are consistent with the building material both on and off-site. Walls, refuse enclosures, and lighting fixtures are also consistent. These designs contribute to the pedestrian 15 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JNSWURTSONVESTIMONY) T OEM= environment. See, Exhibit "C." There are no existing or proposed transit facilities. TriMet has made no plans for transit facilities in this area. However, the Applicant has identified that the mini-park area at the corner of Walnut and Scholls Ferry provides a practical, convenient, safe and pleasant facility for any -s have ti ee*± transit future transit. Bus pull-out g ' °-~~-iG~ have been Standard facilities for TriMet and the 200 to 250 foot line-of-sight distances along Scholls Ferry provide adequate length. The wade depth landscaping area along Scholls Ferry Road in the site plan also provides an appropriate and feasible location for widening Scholls Ferry to accommodate bus pull-out lanes. in any event, this standard only applies to "existing or proposed" transit facilities and only "where needed." No transit facilities are "existing" nor, "proposed" for this site by any transit authority or by the City's transportation plan. Thus, further compliance is not required. M. Signage (page 17 of Winterowd Report) v Contrary to Thriftway's assertions, the "model" Signage for the grocery store illustrates the style, color, materials, location and relationship to architectural elements that will be used for all buildings at the site. All buildings will- fifth incorporate the same architectural elements (discussed above in Section III), thus compatibility is assured. Whether one sign says "Albertsons" and another sign says "Shari's," the style, color, etc. will be the same. Thus, the Code provision is complied with. In addition, there will be only one pedestal (freestanding) sign on the site as allowed by the Code. The design of this sign is included in the Application's Exhibit "C-2." All signage issues have been satisfied by the Application submittals. Again, signage requirements are detailed and mandatory in the Code, and subsequent building signs must strictly comply with the Code and conditions of approval. IV. RESPONSES TO ISSUES RAISED IN THE SULLIVAN MEMORANDUM A. Notice Issue (Rage 1 of Sullivan Memorandum) This issue is fully addressed in Section II of this memorandum. In essence, adequate legal notice was provided. The site was posted. The City posted notice publicly at City Hall. There are no notice requirements violated. Thriftway simply choose to save attorney fees and appear at only one public hearing (before the City Council). Thriftway made a "tactical" error and there is no legal reason why Thriftway 16 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE ( JHSVISERTSONVEST IMONY ) I L..---la 1.c ,.1•.o„ a Special exception to the Code requirements. All Also as discussed in Section-II herein, there is no Goal 1 violation. The duly authorized and activated (at the time) neighborhood association, NPO-7, reviewed the Applicant's requests for CC planning and zoning, development plans, etc. This review occurred on two separate occasions prior to filing the Application. No CIT was formed and activated prior to the -jsatv~u ma-eating l..y filing the Application. An additional Tteityii~Lii~h0o was held just before filing in accordance with the new code provision. Citizen participation requirements were fully complied with. B. Goal 2 (gage 3 of Sullivan Memorandum) Contrary to Thriftway's assertion, the record includes alternative planning considerations. The Application at 4 identifies that the site layout, building designs and uses were all modified several times after citizen input from landowners, city planners and NPO-7. See also, Exhibit "C." The location for the CC zone was altered early on in the planning process from the C-N location north of Walnut Street on the recommendation of City Planners and members of NPO-7. The 8 acre site size resulted from the planning decision to excavate the site to assure minimal impact on views, noise and lighting from the slopping center. The excavation results in approximately 25% of the site (over 2 acres) being incorporated in the excavated steep slopes on the east and south, plus the landscaping. The choice of this site over the other three sites that "could" qualify for CC zoning are discussed above in Section III C(3). In essence, this site is the City's best choice location and best meets the purposes of the CC planning and zoning text. C. Goal f (page 3 of Sullivan Memorandum) Waste and process discharge issues are address in Exhibit "C" and "I." The applicable requirements are specific, mandatory and clearly set forth in the City's Code and EQC regulata.ons. Compliance with these requirements are appropriate conditions of approval as recommended by the Planning Commission. See also, Staff Report at 21. Noise is also addressed in the City's Code, requires an engineers report with decibel evaluations set to prescribed City standards. Again, this an appropriate subject for compliance as a condition of approval. Feasibility for future compliance is addressed in Exhibit "C," Staff Report at 21, the Application at 25, and the Zickes Report attached hereto as Exhibit "I." 17,- APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JNSWBERTSON VEST I VONY ) JOIN I ll~p D. Goal 9 (gage of Sullivan MemorandumD The City's adoption of a "CC" planning and zoning designation included a legislative determination of the City's "need" for -a mid-range commercial use in higher density residential areas of the City., See also, Application at 5 -6 where the Applicant identifies this commercial, need, that the city has no existing CC zones to satisfy that need, and that tine subject property Ali~. :lrea•`T been identified by, City L.y planning reports as the prime location for "CC" zoning. Thriftway's assertion that the jobs generated for the Applicant's project (see Application at 29 - 30) are "likely to displace existing or planned" jobs already in Tigard is nonsensical. The addition of new job positions to the City's inventory is an "addition." Even if a worker left an existing Tigard job position for the Applicant's project, the vacancy would still be refilled by a new worker - thus, adding to the job inventory. The 6.93 acres of 10C-N" to be changed to 8 acres of "CC" is explained in the Application. In essence, the 6.93 acres of C-N is not in compliance with the City's Code for size, trade area and impacts. The existing C-N zoning was and continues to be a "mistake." Applicant' traffic analysis shows that the impacts of the C-N parcel are nearly the same as the proposed CC parcel. Thus if the City recognizes the "mistake," changing the C-N to CC only creates a 1.03 acre increase in the City's commercial development inventory. Such an increase is justified by the market status of this area, projected densities and the city's own "CC" zoning need. See Application at 8 - 11 and the Ryan O'Brien Report (Exhibit "J"). E. Goal 10 (page 4 of Sullivan Memorandum) The effect of this Application on housing goals is adequately addressed in the Application at 24 -25 and 30. The City Staff Report in its analysis confirms that these goal requirements are "satisfied." See page 22 and 12 of the Staff Report. The conclusion is that the lost housing is R-25 zoning with a net effect of only a reduction of 0.07% of the City's developable residential land. This loss will not lower the City's housing stock below she Metro Housing Rule standard, nor be below housing needs set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Thriftway has also asserted that the 3.95 acre multi- family to the south of the site cannot be developed. This argument has no basis in fact or logic. Exhibit "J" explains that the 3.95 acre can be fully developed at multi-family densities. Thriftway's other assertion that the Walnut Road Agh 18 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JWS\ALBERTSON\TESTINCNY) 7 extension caused a further loss of unaccounted for multi- family density is equally baseless. The Staff Report dated July 12, 1983 for the Krueger Comprehensive Plan Amendment (entered into evidence by Thriftway) identifies at page 5, that when the new planning and zoning designations are placed on the subject property, the zoning was subject to the "widening and realignment of Murray Blvd." This directly corresponds to the City Council's orders in 1986 defining the parcel sizes upon the expected'Murray - Walnut realignment. Application FJX.lit •Lu_irr_ ~ prra J ..=3311 -an.. na_A e~ Thus. _ the housing ~ . calculations for this site incorporated the existence of the Walnut Street expansion, and that land was not deemed part of the City's futures housing stock. F. Goal 12 (mane 6 of Sullivan Memorandum) The transportation goal has been addressed by the Applicant. The applicable transportation rules are complied with under the analysis set forth in the Application at 25 - 26, 13, and Application Exhibits "O" and "P" (the traffic studies) and Exhibit "K" attached hereto. The Staff Report also concurs that the transportation requirements are complied with, and the Application will result in a "net reduction in total system traffic." This conclusion is directly supported by the above described traffic studies and independently confirmed.by the City's traffic engineer. Alternative modes of transportation are fully addressed in the traffic studies. Access analysis is also set forth in the traffic studies. Washington County must ultimately approved the accesses off Scholls Ferry Road. However, sufficient evidence exists to show that compliance is "feasible." Attached hereto is Exhibit "K" which is the additional information that Washington County requested for completing its evaluation of traffic functions and the Scholls Ferry accesses. See also, Exhibit "N." This supplemental traffic study was submitted to the County on January 10, 1994 and the County is submitting a letter to the City identifying that the submittal is complete - satisfies all submittal requirements addressing all applicable transportation issues. The supplemental traffic study identifies that the proposed accesses and the projects traffic ,encration/patterns comply with all applicable traffic standards. Thus, a condition of approval that Washington county ultimately approve the plan and accesses is appropriate and the "feasibility" of approval is supported by substantial evidence. 19 - APPLICIONTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JO\ALSERTSONVESTIMONY) I I f G. Goal 14 (page 7 of Sullivan Memorandum) mom ® The site is within the LCDC acknowledged Metro Urban Growth Boundary and the City's urban boundary. The proposed change 'reclassifies one erroneously created urban commercial zone (C-N) for another urban commercial zone (CC). The net change in uses is an increase of the City's total urban commercial acreage by 2.07 acres. Approval of the Application wili directly aaaiSt tJLLe City in fulfilling its need for CC 3 3 vviiiacy aiv iv wa. ea.. is enactment of the CC planning and zoning atext. See the Application Exhibit "I." The Applicant has shown that the proposed changed is compatible with Goal 14. M. TCP Policy 1.1.1 (page 7 of Sullivan Memorandum) Thriftway has tried characterizing the Application as a "general commercial" zone change. However, the Application only includes uses and development characteristics permitted outright in the CC zone. The City adopted the CC zone as a "mid-range" commercial zone intentionally restricting its scope to preclude or downsize the uses allowed in a general commercial zone. Nevertheless, some uses are common between the CC and CG zones. Just because some of the Applicant's proposed uses could also be allowed in a CG zone does not make the proposed uses a CG zoning plan. In fact, the history of Albertsons' plans for the site establish that many economically significant uses have been lost or reduced in conforming to -the new CC requirements such as: elimination of a 35,000 sq.ft. Payless store, reduction of approximately 42,000 sq.ft. of commercial space, and reduction of a grocery store from 50,000 to 40,000 sq.ft. 1. TCP ?policies 5.1.3 5.1.5 (page S of Sullivan Memorandum). Thriftway's concern with preservation of the downtown commercial district is misplaced. First, the City adopted the CC zoning with the clear legislative intent to serve neighborhood needs that are at least mile from any other retail commercial uses (including the Central Business District). Secondly, this subject property's trade area does not even overlap with the location of the Central Business District. The uses in the CC zone, fully complied with by this Application, legislatively restrict the conflicts between the two commercial districts. Thus, the City's policies of maintaining the viable core area and preventing encroachment upon the Central Business District are ^omplied with by all the restrictions incorporated into the CC zoning. 20 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE J6dS\ALBERTSON VEST I MONY ) t1~ J. Housing Policies (page 9 of Sullivan Memorandum)_ The Applicant has already addressed compliance with all housing policies under Section III J and IV E. K. Public Facilities and services (page 16 of Sullivan Memorandum) The Applicant has juVis iCU cU-Biplicanc"a 1Ni 'a all public; facilities and services issues. Where subsequent technical submittals will comply with applicable standards, conditions of approval are appropriate. Thus, subsequent plan approvals for storm water management and erosion control. are proper subjects for a condition of approval. Thriftway, however, tries to suggest that there are no existing public water duality facilities in this area as an indication that Applicant could never satisfy the requirements. Thriftway's response. is very misleading. "Private" storm water facilities (to be located on the site) are allowed for compliance within the regulations. See the City Staff's recommended conditions of approval for storm drainage at p. 19 ("M" and "N") and erosion control ("J" and et0"). See also the comments in Section IV C, Exhibit "I" attached hereto, and City Staff Report at 22 -23. Compliance with these policies is feasible and assured by the plan or the recommended conditions of approval. L. Transportation (page 10 of Sullivan Memorandum) Again, transportation policies are fully addressed with compliance in Section III A (1) and K, and Section IV F herein. Public transit does not "exist," nor is it "proposed" for this area by TriMet. This satisfies the applicable City policies and code provisions. However, the Applicant has provided a feasible location for any future (whenever it may occur) public transit service that will integrate with the design of the site. The proposed sidewalks along Walnut and Scholls Ferry would provide direct-line and safe access to all the buildings. M. Energy Policies (gage 11 of Sullivan Memorandum) 'Goal 13 and Policies 9.1.1, 9.1.2 and 9.1.3 are addressed in the Staff Report at page 23 and in the Application at 26 and 31 - 32. The locating of this CC shopping center in the middle of the 3 or 4 potential CC sites and upon the site where the highest residential density is located, provides a setting where alternative forms of transportation are most likely to be utilized. The,Applicant's plan provides at least 6 pedestrian and bicycle access points with emphasis for facilitating pedestrian/bicycle traffic from the nearby multi- 21 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JId WBERTSONVESTIMONY) ~1v family 71 F,m fam , v a....~. a.aac ciiiitnaz.ion of the Planning Commission's recommended automobile access directly to Northview Drive (the access is not included in the Applicant's plan) would further encourage alternate transportation and discourage the use of automobiles by residentis to the east. N. Special AreaS (gage 11 of Sullivan Memorandum) Thriftway's argument here.is a "rehash" of its comments in Section I above. See Applicant's remarks under that section. In addition, the City's previous interpretation that the trade area size, limitation on uses and the k mile separation requirements of the CC zone adequately protect the other commercial zones (including the CBD). Although, Mr., Sullivan and Thriftway were active participants opposing the adoption of the CC planning and zoning, they did not appeal its final adoption. The City's legislative interpretations of these built-in protections are not subject to reversal in the courts. Clark v. Jackson County, supra. 0. Locational Criteria (page 12 of Sullivan Memorandum) Thriftway cites Comprehensive Plan Policies 12.1.1(2) and (3) beings applicable to the application. However, except for the false assertions that the 3.95 acre multi-family parcel to the south is not developable, Thriftway fails to identify how the policy would apply or be violated by the Application. Indeed, Policy 12.1 specifically focuses (i.e. - limits) its application to location of "housing types, " not commercial uses or a relationship thereto. The "Introduction" to Chapter 12 does mention "commercial uses," but Policy 12.2 is separately set out for "commercial uses." Thriftway does not identify any basis for its claim of applicability. Indeed, the City Staff Report and Planning Commission findings have interpreted the Code as this provision not applying. Further, Thriftway then asserts that the Applicant has not addressed Policy 12.2.1(a) - (c) and 12.2. Policy 12.2.1 states that "the City shall" (emphasis added) provide or apply the criteria under (a) through (c). The City's responsibility arises when reviewing the application. The City Council has not yet adopted findings on these three policies because it has not yet approved the Application. Similarly, Thriftway's reference to Policy 12.2 being applicable only arises, at best, in the City Council's review and adoption of findings. This Policy identifies that, on its face, it is declaration of the "in-tent of the plan" itself, not implementation criteria. Those implementation criteria are actually set forth in Policy 12.1.1(4). There is, however, persuasive and substantial evidence in the record to 22 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDEUCE (JNS\ALI3ERTS0N\TESTIM0NY) MGM!; i 9 show compliance with this Policy. P. Conditions (page 13 of Sullivan Memorandum) Contrary to Thriftway's assertion, the City's proposed conditions of approval are based on evidence that establishes that the Applicant can "feasibl yon comply with the c_nd iti-,~^ Condition 2(a) for pedestrian pathways has already been complied with at the Deceinner 14, 1993 hearing. Condition 2(b) relating to noise evaluation is an appropriate subject for condition of approval. The noise standards have clearly defined limitations that are mandatory. Both the design of the screening and feasibility to comply are addressed in Exhibit "C." Finally, both conditions 2(d) and 2(e) are addressed as legally appropriate and feasible for compliance in Sections III H and I herein. See also, Exhibit "C." 9. CONCLUSION Thriftway and other certain persons failed to appear before the Planning Commission after duly given notices were provided in compliance with City Code and State law. The City's Code restricts review of this application to the record established before the Planning Commission. Therefore, all testimony and evidence presented by these parties lacking standing should be found in violation of the Code's procedural requirements. Applicant requests, since Thriftway has declared its intention to appeal even before a final decision has been made, that the City adopt alternative findings: (1) that Thriftway, etc. lacks standing and failed to participate in the reviewable record before the Planning Commission, and their testimony must be excluded; and (2) in the event a final appeal overturns these procedural determinations, the City makes findings on all the evidence that was presented by all parties (regardless of standing and scope of records). Including an expanded record, the Applicant believes it has adequately satisfied all the applicable policies, goals and regulations for approval. DATED this day of January, 1994. Respectfully submitted, J N SHONKWILER, P.C. w ohn W. Shon wiler, OSB #75337 Of Attorneys for Albertsons 23 - APPLICANTS' ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE (JUS\AL8ERTS0N\TEST1140NY) I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING _ STATF. Or OREEGOIN j County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard 5 ) I, being first duly sworn/affirm; on oath depose and say: (Please print) That I am a 1(UY 1 }+i`~(1Z. f t`j rmz( for The City of Tigard, Oregon. _-ZThat I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer 7-1~Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A") was mailed to each named persons at the address shown o the s attached list ma-,ked exhibit "B" on the yeti- day of e 19 , said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was posted on appropriate bulletin board on the day of NA , 19 ; and deposited the United S=ates Mail on the Lill- day of 19 postage prepaid. Pr eDared Notice S- -6-d and sworn/affirm to me on the day of N Y PUBLIC O GON COR" .'.;SSION NO. 0089Y7 ; My Commission ~ires: G 7 ,4S MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 7, 1995( RECI EXHIBIT PAGE ---.OF s , N O T I C E O F P U B L I C HE A R_I N G NOTICE IS HERBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, January 25, 1994 , AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION AT A PUBLIC HEARING THAT WAS CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 14, 1993: FILE NO: CPA 93-0009/ZON 93-0003/SDR 93-0014/CUP 93-0002/MLP 93-0013 FILE TITLE: Albertson's Inc./Duncombe APPLICANT: Albertson's Inc. OWNER: Margery Crist 17001 NE San Rafael. Rt. 1 Box 792 Portland, OR 97230 Beaverton, OR 97007 REQUEST: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/ PA 93-0009 ZONE CHANGE/ZON 93-0003 ST_TE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/SDR 93-0014 CONDITIONAL USE/CUP 93-0002 MINOR LAND PARTITION/MLP 93-0013 ALBERTSON'S/DUNCOMBE A request for the following development approvals: 1) Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to redesignate approximately eight acres of a 12 acre parcel from Medium-High Density Residential to Community Commercial on tax lot 200 and to redesignate an approximately 6.93 acre parcel from Neighborhood commercial to Medium-High Density Residential on tax lot 100. Zone changes accompanying the above plan changes includes a zone change from R- 25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre, Planned Development) to C-C (Community Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre); 2) Site Development Review approval to alloo: the construction of a 53,550 square foot multiple-use commercial retail building; 3) Conditional Use approval to allow the construction of a 4,000 square foot gasoline station; 4) Minor band Partition approval to divide the 12 acre parcel into two parcels of approximately eight acres and four acres each. LOCATION: Southeast and northeast quadrants of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Walnut Street. (WCTM 2S1 4BB, tax lots 100 and 200) APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.4.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.5.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 12.1.3, 12.2.1, and 12.2.4; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.32, 18.56, 18.60, 18.61, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.2.08, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.130, 18.162, and 18.164. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER'18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 639-4171, EXT. 355 (VOICE) OR 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. 4 _2 BMW ' PAGE ~OF ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STA:pF' REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL. MAY CONTINUE THR Allhk PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER January 5, 1994, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE FLARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLANT. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE, OR FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE WITH SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY SO AS TO PROVIDE THE CITY, APPLICANT, OR OTHER PARTIES TO THE APPLICATION WITH A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND, WILL PRECLUDE APPEAL ON SAID ISSUE TO THE STATE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS (LUBA). ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR STAFF PLANNER Dick Bewersdorff AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 23125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON 97223. MOM ( _ ~Al$R' The C i t y o f T I G A R D ` .w. ENS ' tApRNrr CPA I ~ ` ~ a.w. ~ 9;-0009 32' 33 5 4 W. IS 'I PROP05AL ~ INOOH N S i t e Are. s r-r I.W. „fig ~ ~E-"1t•"' ~ ~ ` ~ E~TENS.IQri.. S.W. MAR i poi i tl • t ~ S.w, WALNUT ST. "r ,/~~/~P\p\y u ~J Y 1 t i t PAGE -OF ..~...s.r zz LS1330000400 •-1S133CD00203 iOPFER, MARLIN H & MARILYN D RAK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 90 SW SCHOLLS FY RD 14780 SW OSPREY DR SUITE 275 ARD OR 97223 BEAVERTLON OR 97007 LS133CDO8700 IS133CDO8800 4ILLER, MATTHEW HAND ILENE R. COLEMAN, TIMOTHY J & ROLAND W L3887 SW GRIST CT 13865 SW CRIST CT PIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 LS133CDO8900 2SI04B003200 1ABORE, LARRY D/CHRISTINE A CRIST, MARGERY F/JOHN R TRUSTEES L2027 SW WILTON AVE - 15950 SW DEERCREST LN PIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S104BA01400 2S104BA01500 3HABASHEVICH, MARAT/INNA FATEHI, AMIR M &'CAROL L L3858 SW HINDON CT 13870 SW HINDON CT PIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA01600 2SI04BA01700 :)DELL, ROBERT M JR. CIARK, SUSAN L 13892 SW HINDON CT 13918 SW HINDON CT Tll.GARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA01900 2S104BA02000 )RAGA, ROBERT F/CATHLEEN L• STEELE, GEORGE E & PATRICIA R L3901 SW HIl'J'DON CT 13869 SW HINDON CT PIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA02100 2SI04BA02200 ?ULONE, DOMINICK/EMILY 0 WESTGATE, JOHN B AND GRETCHEN R 225 STANFORD LANE 14670 SW 136TH PLACE SEAL BEACH CA 90740 TIGARD OR 97224 2S104BA02300 2S104BA02500 RICKARD, DAVID A/MARGARET S KICKNER, ROBERT I. & MARILYN D L2061 SW WILTON AVE 13874 SW CRIST CT rIGARD OR 97224 - 'TIGARD OR 97223 2SI04BA02600 2SI04BA02700 LAMERS, BILL M AND DEBBIE L PHILLIPS, JOHN F & KRISTI A 13916 SW CRIST CT 10275 SW GULL PL rIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 004BB00300 2S104BB00400 LINDSTROM, TERRY S CHET HARRINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC 14194 SW NORTHVIEW 5863 BAY POINT DRIVE rIGARD OR 97223 Eximo r - LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 ~ Y PAGE _0F ~~6 limll MINE--, 2S104BB00500 2SI04BB00600 ROYAL HOMES, INC FLEMING, DAVID A. 5'SW AMES WAY RT 3 BOX 538 ORTLAND OR 97225 HILLSBORO OR. 97124 2SI04BE00700 2SI04BB00800 TILLEY HOMES INC ROBBINS, RICHARD L 6497 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY RD 14320 SW AYNSLEY WAY PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S104BB00900 2S104BB01000 CHET HARRIN ON CONSTRUCTION INC GREATER NO EST INVESTMENT INC 5863 BAY PNT DRIVE PO BOX 78 LAKE, OSWAGO OR 97035 TL*ALJiTI r_% 97062 ,rod 2S104BB01100 2S104BB01200 GREATER NORTHWEST INVESTMENTS IN MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PO BOX 787 7160 SW HAZELFERN RD TUALATIN OR 97062 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BB01300 2SI04BB01400 - MATRIX DEVEL 11MENT CORPORATION MATRIX DEV PMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW HA LFERN RD _ 7160 SW jtlKZE RD GARD OR 97223 TIGARD R 97223 2S104BB01500 2SI04BB01600 MATRIX DEVELO ENT CORPORATION MATRIX DEVEL'?PAENT CORPORATION 7150 SW HAZ FERN RD 7160 SW HA'ELFERN RD TIGARD OR 7223 TIGARD O 97223 2S104BB01700 f" 2S104BB01800 MATRIX DEVELO MENT CORPORATION MATRIX DEVE PMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZ ERN RD 7160 SW ELFERN RD TIGARD OR 9 223 TIGARD 97223 2S104BB01900 2SI04BB02000 ROYAL HOMES C DURA-BUILT CONSTRUCTION INC 5445 SW AME WAY 743 6TH ST PORTLAND OR 97225 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 2S104BB02100 2SI04BB0220 DUTHIE, JILL K JIL REVEL MENT INC 14232 SW WINDSONG CT PO BOX 33 TIGARD OR 97223 BEAVER ON OR 97075 41104BB02300 2S104BB02500 JIL DEVELOPMENT INC FLEMMING, DAVID A PO BOX 1633 RT 3 BOX 538 BEAVERTON OR 97075 HILLSBORO OR 97124 ' PAGE OF I MINE i ~o~ nwnan•aGnn 2S104BB02800 G V LVi L✓VY VV v TRIX DEVE MENT CORPORATION GARY REED DEVELOPMENT INC 0 SW HA. LFERN RD 6177 SW 173RD GARD OR'97223 ALOHA OR 97007 2S104BB02900 2S104BB03000/ MATRIX DEVELOPMEN CORPORATION MATRIX DEVEE PPMENT CORPORATION 7160 SW HAZELF RD 7160 SW F ZELFrri RD TIGARD OR 9722 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BB03100 2S104BB03200 3 & K PARTNERS KRUEGER-PEEKS, CHANEL 2435 SW PARK RD' 14145 SW NORTHVIEW_DRIVE LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BB03300 2S104BB03400 MATRIX DEVELO T CORPORATION R&K DEVELOPMENT CO 7160 SW HAZ FERN RD 14780 SW OSPREY, STE 275 TIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S104BB03500 2SI04BB03600 PORTLAND PAINTING, INC M & F DEVELOPMENT CO 9540 SE WOODED HILLS CT 17707 SE OATFIELD RD RTLAND OR 97236 GLADSTONE OR 97027 2S104BB03800 2S104BB03900 DURA-BUILT /NSTRUCTION INC GEARHART, JOHN J & TRACY M 743 6TH S 14086 SW LIDEN RD LAKE OSW O OR 97034 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BB04600 2SI04BB04700 MORRIS, CAROL H WHITE, KEVIN M & KIMBERLY S 14092 SW CHEHALEM COURT 14056 SW CHEHALEM CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2SI04BB04800 'j 2SI04BB04900 BARICEVIC, MLADEN DBA ARBE HOMES JIL DE61EL0 ENT INC 14795 SW OSPRAY ,'#921 PO BOX 1 3 BEAVERTON OR 97007 BEAVER N OR 97075 2S104BB05000 2SI04BB0510O SKORO, MILAN AND NEDA SKORO, MI NEDA 18680 SE HWY 212 18680 SE eAND 212 CLACKAMAS OR 97015 CLACKAMAS OR 97015 04BB05300 2S104BB05500 ROBBINS, RICHARD L BULLMAN, CHRIS.W & SHANNON L 14320 SW AYNSLEY WAY 14077 SW CHEHALEM CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 EXHIBIT lad , Waav.mav..... 2S104BB05600 2SI04BB05700 •UKV VU- n YJJ LVL'LK ~a".L Afl[f YA tlT TL+1T TT]T T7')S]L+ VAMT.C / J.at'~Ldtir8iY ll., 1'1 2J i~1T .LlL7tf ta,i\L ti lava-auv 680 SE )[flY 212 14795 SW Y #921 CKAMAS OR 97015 BEAVERTON OR 97007 2S104BB05800 2S104BB05900 MATRIX DEVELCMENT_CORPORATION VIRGILIO, DOMINIC VIC 6n fiLu itiu7_hrr,h'h~f2N xu 14172 SW CHE14ALEM CT TIGARD OR 9'7223 TIGARD OR 97223 3S104BB06000 2SI04BB06100 .HET HARRINGTON NSTRUCTION INC M & F DEVELOPMENT CO 5363 BAY POINT R - 17707 SE OATFIELD RD LAKE OSWEGO O 97035 GLADSTONE OR 97027 2S104BB06200 2S104BB997223 WICKENS CONSTRUCTION, INC MATRIX PMENT CORPORATION 18317 SW FALLATIN LOOP 7160 SW FERN RD Y ALOHA OR 97007 TIGARD 2S104BB06400 2S104BB06500 WILLIAMS, DAVID S AND DIANIdA L PORTLAND P- " ING, INC 14143 SW STARDUST LANE 9540 SE W DED HILLS CT GARD OR 97223 PORTLAN OR 97236 2S104BB07100 2SI04BB07200 KLICKITAT VALLEY BANK CHABAD LUBAVI OF OREGON PO BOX 167 14355 SW SC LLS FERRY RD GOLDENDALE WA 98620 BEAVERTON R 97007 2S104BB07300 2SI04B000900 CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF OREGON LUKER, DARLENE 14355 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD 14285 SW FERN BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD OR 97223 2S1050000200 2SIO50001300 MORSE BROS, INC EVANS, ROBERT V PO BOX-7 12745 NE MORRIS S^1 LEBANON OR 97355 PORTLAND OR 97230 2S1050001401 CHURCHILL, MARGARET A 14664 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD BEAVERTON OR 97007 EXHIBIT PAGE ~OF . m-m LS1320000300 IS133CC00300 20MI-REHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CO, IN CLARK, GEORGE V AND MARGUERITE A 1--nnQ (UT% Twt+ !A m1?TTCT+F.T:'C , MERCHANT STREET 381 OAK LEAF DRIVE TY FINANCIAL TOWER #904 EUGENE OR 97404 30N0LULU HI 96813 1S133CD08600 2S104BA0ISOO 3RO0KS, TOBY AND MOHR, JAMES BRIAN JR AND 300KATZ, MADLYN F MICHELE ANNE 2260 PAR LANE ,#811 13923 SW :3IND0N COURT 4ILLOUGHBY HILLS bH 44094 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BA02400 2SI04BB02400 KLEIN, STEVEN A AND LEMMON, GREGORY L'& BARBARA K & KARGARET LYNN SAYLER, EMMA JANE 12049 SW WILTON AVE - 2222 SW 213TH PL '_'IGARD OR 97223 ALOHA OR 97006 2S104BB03700 2SI04BB05200 KENYON, TOM PORTLAND PAINTING INC BY YOUNIQUE HOMES SOMERSET DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 2016 9540 SE WOODED HILLS CT LAKE GROVE OR 97036 PORTLAND OR 97236 2S104BB05400 2S104BB06600 rRECKER, TED J & - TILLEY, BRUCE L & KERI A AND ELARDO, TIFFANI M HATHAWAY, JERRY D ;s 14061 SW CHEHALEM CT 14189 SW STARDUST LN A_RD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S104BC01000 CAL WOOLERY PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC. 12356 SW 132ND CT COMPANY TIGARD OR 97223 121 SW SALMON XTTN:PR0PERTY DEPARTMENT PORTLAND OR 97204 KITTELSON & ASSOC INC BILL GROSS 610 SW ALDa, 5-700 11035 SW 135TH PORTLAND OR 97205 TIGARD OR 97223 MARGERY CRIST JODY & LARRY WESTERMAN RT 1 BOX 792 13665 SW FERN ST BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD OR 97223 JOHN SHONKWILER, PC CRAIG PETRIE 13425 SW 72ND AVE 9600 SW CAPITOL HWY TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97219 DON DUNCa IBE ALBERTS(XN'S INC 17001 NE SAN RAFAEL t XHeBTT PORTLAND OR 97230 PAGE r 3-v MEN= PAP *7 TAN ~/-~G- ~~D©~~~y- / ts.•_`_- --~•4so ~iv~s- --..1_z.Y'a~'-~'.v~ _..1~i.Pr-- - _A-N_ 1/Rse--4,e,-- ~ s•. 3 ~'~-!~`3 " s9-~'L~9Tr~_____51`OR't` r~ !"~!~1i'_~B~"s ' Z% v U.-Al!/T 7/G7'' -(OIa 1.y,~L L DxiSP~L~~c-1 2~v - i~ !lf'-- F-f~LL Tp S ©vTRf 70 l`~1I'~L....._ , ~oor TYKE= S/~'iLZDi.U~ !3 L-Gs~ugt- o,= A,4s1 (,,w oi? "Opp. Awc: s j ~ 41,13, oxNierr'6 LL PAGE ~OF Fitt) JI IN lia AOI ~icL-~i /mss g 7 -R y / • .moo-r_.._~`_'~~_l.~.s - FA 610 7'/ rl - <<- b GEC I, JA r- Ar rr~- . -Ta At-c3. EX.Nii3rffr PA OF 3~~ MENEM 'in ME F-1 L -%w of Zonine-i zoning r Planning Subdivision Control ROBERT M. ANDERSON g Congdon Professor of Public Law and Legislation, College of Law, Syracuse University SECTIONS 8.33-14.44 6 VOLUME 2 The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company Rochester, New York The Bancroft-Whitney Company y; San Francisco, California 1968 Agi EXHIBIT I § 11.75 American Law of Zoning of accommodating unlike uses of land. The neighborhoods where commercial services are needed usually are zoned for dI", ; residential use, and often the prime sites have already been - subjected to some residential subdivision and improvement. r; Enthusiasm for the construction of a new center is likely to vary in relation to the proximity of the residents to the pro- posed use. Those nearby, who will feel the direct impact of the traffic, glare, noise, and litter, may be expected to prefer r : that the commercial use occupy a different site. Those who ' live at a safe but convenient distance will be predictably en- thusiastic about the site. Thus, the problem of bringing .J . business services to residential communities involves political problems, and may involve legal ones. The principal response to suburban demand for commercial F services has been the shopping center. Unlike the ribbon,:. development of commerce along a main thoroughfare, a common fact of municipal life in nearly all mature urban areas, the modern shopping center is a planned commercial development of a compact area. Stores and service centers are grouped around a spacious parldng area which is avail- z ' able to the customers of all. In size, these centers vary from ` those consisting of a dozen or so retail stores intended to =3' ; serve the needs of a small area, to regional centers which offer most of the goods and services which are available in the shopping areas of the center city. Generally, shopping cen- ters of both kinds begin with an application for a change of zone to permit a commercial use in an area zoned for resi- dential or agricultural use. The legislative action, granting or denying such applications, has generated a significant "p amount of litigation. Municipal legislative bodies have been singularly recep- y v tive to requests for zone changes to permit shopping centers. A change of this kind has virtue from the standpoint of the legislative decision maker. Suburban areas are faced with financial problems which are difficult to solve with the tax revenues yielded by residential property. A shopping center adds hundreds of thousands to the tax role and represents a quick source of new governmental income without a tax 1 ' 432 h - EXHIBIT PAGE ...-OF. z :zing Agricultural and Business Uses § 11.7 5 5 ;_At the erection of is some sensible sup_ stretched along a highway, an amendment to permit a }e community rather shopping center to use land of greater depth was approved. 'gage in a The court said: profitable ,assifies the land is "shopping centers were not thought of when zoning r d if it is reasonably regulations were first adopted The shopping Ir a shopping center and motoring habits of people are quite different today °:led a 70-foot buffer from what they were in 1931. Popular desire or need 'dertial users? The ~ for large shopping areas and the necessity of adequate tercial use was sus- off-streat parking . . . now seem to be generally the selection of the recognized. However desirable commercial strip zoning :sure compliance with along arterial highways may have appeared in 1931, there l ;g property.lo is ample evidence in this case to support the view that it 7 ' has not stood the test of time and experience./14 permit a shopping -;me measure on the Support for rezoning to permit a shopping center has been hich_,,preceded the found in the existence of commercial uses near the proposed ' fop` commercial site," and in a revision of the community's master plan which !1s, uiie court found makes the location of the proposed shopping center consist- unilateral request ent with the pian.16 ;,Alt from a study of The process of amendment can be slow, and changes in the munieipality.12 the community and in the positions of the disputants can otracted study had occur while the ch_--nge is pending or shortly after a decision before the amend- has been reached. Legislative reconsideration has sometimes resulted in a change of position, and a fete of these disputes :n terms of the in- 3 have reached the courts. That an initial legislative --efusal in the area. For to amend may be considered by the. courts in reviewing final 'ne, 150 feet deep, action is exampled in a Connecticut case where a zone change ' was granted 2 months after the same change had been re- mpstead v Lynne, 32 fused. In the first decision, the legislative body declined to 2, 222 NYS2d 526 amend because it considered shopping facilities to be adequate t Cresent Corp. v 14. Pressman v Baltimore, 222 55 ?vYS2d 272 (1956, permit neighborhood shopping " Md 330, 160 A2d 379 (1960). centers. 51 ALR2d 298. Plains 15. Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Zoning regulations as to shop- ,--©nOne White te Pl Plains Co. v County of Winnebago, 19 111 ping centers. 76 ALR2d 1172. s-on-IiI~udso 13 2d 487, 167 NE2d 401 (1960) ; 16. Pecora v Zoning Com. of i 0, 180 YS2d' Andrews v Town Board of De- Trumbull, 145 Conn 435, 144 A2d 9 APP Div 2d 9, 34, Witt, 98 NYS2d 494 1951), Su 1 62. C PP•) 48 (1958). j Anderson~en;,~gl Annotation: Spot zoning to t 43ci ` € lerT ICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD AND CfJMMLT1dT11Y SUPERMARKETS D THEIR. RESPECTIVE SIZES In order to give you a better understanding of stores and their sizes, and their ages this list combines information provided to the Tigard Planning 'Staff by United Crocers.fThriftway, Safovmy, Flemming Foods, and Albertsons. Note: In sharp contrast to these neighborhood and community grocary storas are regional stores such as Fred Meyer, Cub Foods, and Cosrco which draw shoppers from outside the community and are usually far In excess of 100,000 sq. ft. In size, Supermarket Location Size ~ . Food For Less McLoughlin Blvd, Milwaukie 53,000 Albertsons McKenzie Hwy, Springfield 47,500 Thriftway Wilsonville 47,000 Safeway 181st and Glisan, Portland 53,600 Safeway ,'85th, Aloha 53,600 Food For Less Hwy 26, Gresham $0,000 Albertsons Ashland 47,000 Albertsons 185th and Walker, Aloha 45,000 Shop N Kart Woodburn 41,000 Shop N Kart Albany 41,000 Shop N Kart Hermiston 41,000 a~d 1nFrco~R { U-55 Tualatin 55,000 West 11th, Eugene 53,600 So(-e--Jay Hillsboro 53.601 r~ioertsons Springfield 45,00v Food Connecrion Aloha 40,000 AI(; rtsoris King City 44,000 Shop N Kart Lebanon 41,000 Thriftway Cornell Rd, Beaverton 47,000 Thriftway Murrayhill 43,500 Thriftway Mt. Park 26,000 Albertsons 185th and Farmington 46:,000 Albertsons 174th and Powell 42,0u,, A bertsonS Hall and Greenburg 42,000 Howards Greenway Center 38,000 Thriftway 185ih and Baseline 24,000 Safeway Tigard 30,000 Thriftway Allen and Lombard 26,000 Lake Grove Market Boones Ferry and Bryan' 23,000 Safeway Cedar Hills 22,000 Thriftway 25th and Glisan 16,000 ftway West Slope 11,000 Safeway Cedar Mill 25,000 Safeway Barbur Blvd 250000 Saroway 10th and Jefferson 23,000 i~X►ff~+dY~„ ~ . ! 3 PACE cR E.WIBIT" " F 1 TYPICAL VIDEO RETAIL SALES C4TEGORIES* ideo movie rentals Video movie sales Video equipment rentals Video equipment sales Electronic equipment (radios, stereos, televisions, video cameras and recorders) sales Clothing, merchandise sales Concessionaire food sales (popcorn, candy, soda pop, etc.) Posters and movie memorabilia sales Movie industry publications and hook sales * Survey of Video Stores in Portland Metropolitan area = January, 1994. 1 - EXHIBIT "F" (NSWURTSOMEXAIEIT.0 11 Q1 trIENT CONS. TEL N0.5003 - 6,81-0040 J Iwo. L 1. ' In summary, the Albertson's Community Commercial Development Plan Clearly meets the Intent of a ne..'c:C Zone and adequately provides for the desire of both the Cit+ of Tigard and Washington Y Ill`, that County to locate a commercial iia%~Il.y 4arvices the surrounding residential area. Clearly, providing an anchor grocery store with a small amount of additionei ratan sc:4ce akaea is needed in this ar®a, which will experience a large portion of the residential development, troth South Beaverton and West Tigard, in the future. A substantial amount of land exists in the area that will be developed In the near future. The City adoption of the CC Zone Is very consistent with zones adopted by other cities and counties In other parts of the United States that strongly encourage commercial development at one quadrant I of an Intersection of two collector streets, and In no planning publication I have ever reviewed has development of this type ever been considered 'strip commercial development". In fact, I have j reviewed zoning ordinances of other cities which not only encourage the development of a grocery store, but In fact require the development of the grocery store at the same time or prior to development of any other commercial uses. This prevents development of other types of commercial uses such as a large drug store, home Improvement center, or a larger department store use such as a Fred Meyer. This type of zoning Is specifically Intended to encourage the development of a grocery store to serve the dally needs of residents in the area, as well as limiting vehicular trips outside of the general neighborhood: if the Albertson's store Is not developed, then all the residents in the area would be required to drive to Scholis Ferry to the other two grocery j stores which will Increase traffic congestion and significantly Impact the livability of the ' neighborhoods. Further, by no stretch of the imagination could this site possibly be considered 'strip commercial develo-menr. First of all, the CC Zone automatically excludes strip commercial development because of Its requirement that only one quadrant of a major intersection ba developed with commercial. It Is required to be harmoniously designed and landscaped as one community commercial center. In all planning publications that I have ever reviewed, strip commercial Is clearly defined as a continuous strip of commercial development, generally on both sides of the street, with a multitude of uses and a wide variety of sizes and architectural character. (Evidence of strip commercial Is Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard, Canyon Road and Beaverton Hillsdale Highway in Beaverton, and Tualatin Valley ('NJ Highway In Aloha and the City of Hillsboro. These uses generally have limited depth, inadequate parking, buildings close to the road, uncoordinated signage, poor architectural quality of buildings, limited variety of colors and architectural treatment, clearly inefficient deveoopm :nt patterns, negative traffic Impacts, multiple driveways, inefficient use, of crossover circulation adjacent parking lots, and many of the other unsightly and Inefficient development patterns considered to be undesirable by both planners and government agency officials. It Is impossible in this specific case to make any reference to the subject property as "strip commercial' development. The CC Zone clearly eliminates the potential for any other commercial within -a half mite of the subject property, and automatically eliminates the possibility of strip commercial development. Even Webster's Dictionary Indicates the definition of 'strip" as "a continuous serles'; therefore, the Albertson's development Is clearly not strip commercial. During my past experience with grocery store developments, it has generally been determined that approximately five square feet of grocery store building is required per person. Therefore a 40,000 s ua are foot grocery store Td only require 8,000 people to be properly serviced. In this specific case, the recornn Cates that actual build-out densities within one and one-half miles of the subject property has resulted In 6,931 dwelling units with a projected population of 16,800, vuhich is almost twice the amount necessary for a grocery store of this size (Page 8 of Applicant's Statement with Exhibit `N7. M91T G 2 PACE --OF ATTORNEY AT LAW 4715 BENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STI?FFT PORTLAND. OREGON 07258 TE:].EPIfUNF; November 7, 1991 SOS~..8.451.'i '1•ELECOf'IER X50:11i'.titi-74OM Mr. Michael C. Robinson O'DONNELL, RAMIS, CREW & CORRIGAN 1727 N. W. Hoyt Street Portland, OR 97209 Re: Crist, et al. Property Northeast Quadrant of Murray/Scholls Intersection Dear Mike: Pursuant to my suggestion and your receptivity, I am writing to you to summarize the Owners of Tax Lot 101 position regarding the size of their parcel at the northeast quadrant of the Murray/Scholls Intersection. I do so with the hope that it will lead to the conclusion that the parcel is 6.99 acres (or such amount of land, determined by survey, within the boundaries described as Scholls Ferry to the east, Murray Boulevard extension to the south, and the boundaries of Tax Lot 101 north and east of the parcel). I believe the facts surrounding the creation of the P.D. conceptual plan and the law pertaining to that quasi judicial act mandates such a conclusion. Let me begin with the pertinent facts, which I take from the Staff Report prepared in anticipation of the November 4, 1991 Planning Commission meeting, Ordinance No. 86-12, and the Final Order of the Planning Commission, dated May 11, 1990. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Staff Report, skates at page 2, under "Background Information": "In 1985, a shift in the location of C-N designation to the future Murray Boulevard/ Scholls Ferry Road intersection on the west side of tax lot 100 [101, sic] was proposed (CPA 4-85/ZC 4-85). Because the request was determined to be premature due to unanswered questions relating ta• the Murray Boulevard extension, the four acre C-N designation was reapplied-at the original location on the southwest side of 135th Avenue. It was EXHIBIT a Mr. Michael C. Robinson November 7, 1991 Page Two also agreed that once the alignment of Murray Boulevard was determined, the applicant, Russ Krueger, would be entitled to propose another Murray Boulevard location for the C-N zone. In 1986, Mr. Krueger proposed shifting the C-N designation to a five acre site at the northeast corner of the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and the proposed Murray Boulevard extension (CPA 1-86/ZC 3-86). The City Council approved the applicant's proposal and included a declaration that the .^.On~l••„ra~inn r_f tha five acres designated C-N could be modified to conform with the final alignment . of Murray Boulevard (Ordinance No. 86-12).1' In 1986, the City Council of Tigard adopted Ordinance No. 86-12, which in pertinent part, reads as follows: "WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change to shift the existing area zoned C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) from the side of 135th Avenue to a location on the north side of the proposed Murray Blvd. extension approximately 500 feet west of 135th Avenue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on February 4, 1986 and recommended approval with a condition that the C-N designation not exceed four acres in size; and THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS : .2 EXHIBIT 14 PACE --.OF s e ir , Mr. Michael C. Robinson November 6, 1991 Page Three Section 2: The City Council upholds the Planning commission's recommendation for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendment and the commercial designation will be located as shown in Exhibit ' B' . The configuration of tlae FIVE ACRE C-N designation may be fnodified to conform with the final aligninent of Munay Blvd. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council ;,embers present after being read by number and title only, this 24th day of February, 1986." (Italics supplied.) In November of 1988, an Urban Planning Area Agreement was signed by Washington County, Beaverton and Tigard, which set the alignment of the Murray Boulevard extension further south on the owners' site, thereby expanding the parcel made the subject of Ordinance No. 86-12 from approximately five acres to approximately 6.99 acres. (Staff Report, "Major Issues", p. 9). On May 11, 1990, the Planning commission adopted Final Order No. 90-12 PC for a Zone Change, Planned Development Review, Subdivision Preliminary Plat Review, and Variances to several community development code requirements. The Planned Development Review noted that the C-N parcel designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Neighborhood Commercial was approximately 5.0 acres, and the zoning designation was also C-N. The Tigard Planning Map covered the entirety of the northwest parcel north of the Murray Boulevard extension. The Final Order also noted in "BacXground Information" that: "In 1986, (Ordinance No. 86-12] . . . [t]he city Council approved the applicant's proposal and included a declaration that the configuration of the five acres designated C-N could be modified to conform with the final alignment of Murray Boulevard." EXHIBIT ( q PAGE -OF I Mr. Michael C. Robinson November 7, 1991 Page Four The Final Order and Report also set the north boundary of single and multi-family by stating, at page 3, under "Vicinity Information":' "The proposed Murray Boulevard extension which is designated as a collector street will form the northern boundary of the a proposed subdivision and will separate this development from the undeveloped Neighborhood Commercial site and two remnant parcels that are also a part of the parent subject parcel." M In addition he Final Order, in the "Findings and Conclusions", No. 7, stated: "Chapter 18.60 (C-N zoning district) is satisfied because Parcel C at the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and the Murray Boulevard extension satisfies minimum lot size and dimensional criteria of the zone. No development of this parcel is proposed at this time." Based upon the comprehensive nature of the Final Order, which addressed all of the parcels, Ordinance No. 86-12 and owners' review with Staff, the Owners have entered into a sales agreement for the single-.family residential planned development. Final plans have been submitted to the City of Tigard for Phase I of that development in the last several days. In addition, the Owners have committed to the sale of land on .the west boundary, south of the Murray Boulevard extension with Albertson's, Inc. conditioned upon rezoning eight acres of the south parcel from R-25 to C-N and a rezoning of the northwest parcel from C-N to R-25. Upon receipt of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission several days ago, the Owners, for the first time, were made aware that the Planning Staff viewed the northwest parcel as being limited in area to approximately five acres, whereas the southerly realignment of the Murray Boulevard extension increased that parcel's acreage to approximately 6.99 acres. The Staff Report, at page 9, "B. Major Issues" referred to EXHIBIT PAGE ®F„~. Mm= All W Mr. Michael S. Robinson November 7, 1991 Page Five Ordinance No. 86-12, which moved the C-N designation from the east side of the property to the northeast quadrant of Murray/Scholls intersection, and opined that the "Council's decision provided that, the configuration, but not the size of the five acre parcel could be adjusted when the alignment of SW Murray Boulevard extension was defined. . . .P1 (Italics added). The Report goes on to note: t1. . . Exhibit B of Council Ordinance No. 86-12 shows the 5-acre site approved for Neighborhood Commercial designation in 1986, with the alignment of the SW Murray Boulevard extension as defined at that time. That ordinance noted that the configi ration of the 5 acre C-N designation could be modified to conform with the final alignment of Murray Boulevard. Staff is of the understanding that the reconfiguration referred to by the City Council in this ordinance included only the possible relocation of the 5.0 acres C-N designation. Staff does not understand the _ Council's decision to provide for an increase in size of the C-N designated area, as the applicants in this current proposal have assumed in stating the area's 6.99 acres without the Council specifically approving such an expansion. . . .00 (Staff Report, pp. 9-10) Finally, the Staff Report states, at page 11: . . At present, the area designated C-N by Ordinance 86-12 does not actually have frontage on the approved Murray alignment but is separated from the road by a strip of R-25 designated land. A reconfiguration at this time should have frontage on both Scholls Ferry Road and the Murray alignment. EXHIBIT ~ _ S PAGE OF 11 7AUL Mr. Michael C. Robinson November 7, 1991 Page Six ANALYSIS As set forth in our letter of November 1, 1991, to Mr. Jerry Offer, we note certain- inconsistencies in the treatment of the C-N parcel in that Report. At page 3 of the Report, the Staff states: 1°. . . Three parcels to the north of the Murray extension would have been created by this subdivision including an approximate seven acre parcel at the northeast quadrant of Scholls/Murray intersection." ,a Lha i T...n 4~a,.c4}, aa Ordinaw~^^e ~ No. 86-12 b, -xplzcitiy pr.oV,;idCU~ I.. t the "conf I..igura t ion of the five acre C-N designation may be modified to conform with the final alignment of Murray Boulevard." in our view, the clear meaning of the language is that the configuration of the five acre "designation" is to be modified to conform to the new boundary, with a resultant increase or decrease in the actual acreage once Murray Boulevard was realigned. The interpretation adopted by the Staff would require the Ordinance to read: "Boundaries encompassing up to five acres designated C-N shall be modified to conform to the realignment of Murray Boulevard with any excess zoned R-25." That is not what the Ordinance says. The Ordinance clearly says that the five acre designation could be modified to conform to the altered boundary of realigned Murray Boulevard, with the result that the acreage would be larger or smaller than five acres. The word "modified" does not necessarily exclude a greater acreage, as argued for by the Staff. The modification spoken of means to alter the boundary with an effect of increasing or decreasing the total C-N acreage. In fact, the relocation increased it. The entire history of this parcel's C-N designation has awaited the realignment of Murray Boulevard, which has now been accomplished. The Murray Boulevard extension existent at the time of Ordinance No. 86-12, as shown by Exhibit B, thereto, clearly shows the south line of the parcel to be overlaid by the then projected Murray Boulevard extension. The site map for the entire development preliminarily approved by the Final Order, EXH,MIT PAGE OF r AGE& Mr. Michael C. Robinson ' avOVCAli.7CL 7, 1991 Page Seven shows Murray Boulevard extension to be substantially south of the north lot line of Tax Lot 101. At all times, the Comprehensive Plan included the totality of the parcel north of Murray Boulevard as carrying C-N zoning. As is customary,, the Comprehensive Zoning Map controls zoning boundaries under the Tigard Development Code. (See Sections 18.40.020) While it is true that the western terminus of the Murray Boulevard extension has not been dedicated, it has been set in stone by the UPAA agreement between Tigard, Beaverton and Washington County. In addition, the final platting application, which has recently been filed with the City of Tigard, requires the dedication of the western portion of Murray Boulevard. Upon adoption of the plat, which is not a subject of contention, it will be a dedicated road. The Murray Boulevard exte„sL location has been relied upon by Owners, developers, and the Aft- City since 1988. Had the earlier more northerly alignment of Murray Boulevard, existent in 1986, been dedicated and then vacated to accommodate the southerly alignment, the Tigard Development Code is clear that lands formally within the vacated Murray Boulevard automatically are subject to the same zoning designation that is applicable to lands to which the street attaches. Ordinance No. 89-06, Ordinance 83-52, Section, codified at 18.40.030(5). Subsection 5 is not dependent upon uncertainty, contradiction or conflict as to the intended location of district boundary lines in streets, as it is entirely consistent with the law of conveyances. State ex rel Dept. of Transportation v. Tolke, 46 Or. App. 751, 586 P. 2d 791 (1978) . The Owners and their predecessors have relied upon the City to place the Murray Boulevard extension and retain the C-N designation upon the resultant northwest parcel. The argument, at pages 10-11 of the Staff Report, that there is no uncertainty about the size of the C-N zone at five acres, begs the question. There is more than a clue that the south boundary is fixed at the center line of the now relocated Murray Boulevard extension, which is placed upon the land by contract and actual design. The assertion in the Staff Report that the call of "approximately five acres" controls the area over definite boundaries set forth in the Comprehensive Plan is contrary to ExHiarr - f( PAGE ---OF 1~5 Mr. Michael C. Robinson November 7, 1991 Page Eight the law of surveying and boundaries, as stated in Clark's Law of Surveying and.Boundaries, 5th Ed., (Michie Co. 1987) : "When a description contains definite and permanent boundaries, all of the land that is identified as being within the boundaries will be conveyed in the instrument, regardless if the area has a surplus or a deficit. The same principle will apply if there is a question as to the area; it will be construed against the grantor." Id. at Section 16.19, p. 399. Similarly, "uncertainty in a description of where the line is located between more and less restricted districts must be resolved in favor of the property owner and against any implied enlargement of a more restrictive district abutting his property." Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning, Ziegler, (Clark Boardman Co. 1991) at Section 1603[3], at pp. 16-13/16-14. Finally, if the Staff's interpretation is adopted it will have the anomalous result of placing an R-25 strip along the entire southern boundary of the subject parcel, thereby denying access of the remaining five acres to Murray Boulevard. Such an anomalous result bears little resemblance to a well-thought-out master plan for the public health and welfare. See, City of Ofnaha v. Cutchall, 114 N. W. 2d 6 (Neb. 1962) , Hecht-Dann Construction Corp. v. Burden, 124 Misc. 632, 208 NYS 299 (1924). The presumption of validity of such split zoning is substantially diminished. See, Spanich v. City of Livonia, 94 NW.2d 62 (Mich. 1959). In conclusion, we'believe that the history of the treatment of the subject parcel as a unit bounded by Murray Boulevard, which boulevard everyone knew was to be realigned in the future, and the language of Ordinance No. 86-12, plus the City's Code § 18.40.030(5), strongly indicates that the parcel, as now configured north of Murray Boulevard, is all C-N. Any other interpretation is contrary to analogous conveyancing law. It is also illogical, as it creates a strip zone on the south boundary making the property unusable. EXHIBIT PAGE _()F ter.. Mr. Michael C. Robinson November 7, 1991 Page Nine The Owners have relied upon the C-N zone applying to the entire parcel. The parcel, which since November, 1988, has been 6.99 acres. That reliance is demonstrated by owners' commitment to sell property in the southwestern portion of their site to Albertson's, Inc. If the threatened reduction to five acres of the C-N zone causes the City to view Albertson's application as seeking too great an expansion of the zone (5 to 8 acres, rather than 7 to 8 acres), then the Owners will have been severely damaged. I trust this letter will assist you in advising the City of the correct interpretation of the facts consistent with the law, so that this sub-issue may be disposed of promptly and the Albertson's application may be addressed upon its merits. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience, so that we can attempt to resolve this issue and seek solutions on Albertson's application. Very truly yours, GARRY P. M RRY & ASSOCIATES ;r ~Y_y ~r aGPM: cj c cc: Mr. Jerry Offer Mr. John Shonkwiler Mr. Scott Russell Mr. Craig Petrie c EN," S'14 NK. ILER EXHIBIT 14 _d? PAGE ©r rd7 u t•it" b,rend tax trantmftftt memo 70 m pt o o / 9489 ~ giintbua Awaue ne S~""eO11®'" PC. Sox COW Purtiow, OR 97284 - MeamveOosR v dM •e ' Tot Norm Mm FROM Wes Zicker DATE: January 13, 1994 RE: Albertson 'a Tigard Store Job No. 4^2949-0301 7bis is in response to the information you sent u® today ragacding the eubjeot Project idvAfied as 1111109 2 through 17 of page 10 of a rnemorandara. 3'b® comaneuts refer the policies con=dng storm maMement in the 'Tualatin Rider basin. These ttandards included in these policies trust be met by any nM development in the basin, including the subject project site. As noted on line 10 throuTgb 12 this is nsaaWty t~,a® W.,ag --ndifinne nn _e develop meat at One time of site plan rMVN. We anticipate that such it condition will result for the City of 71gard Development Review process for this project. Line 12 and 13 of this mento or* Correct, there is no water quality facility at this :iMe. Our intent is to design such a facility into the landscaping area along Scboll't Derry Road as part of the final de.xign of the project. At this time we are not certain as to the form this facility mty tom, those deWls will be clarified during our dal design of the site Improvements. It may assist the site review to indicate this location of a proposed water quality facilhy on the site plan. It is our opinion sleet the statement 11bat Is insufficient to meet the n9a ad this plan policy" on litre 16 and 17 is not true and does not respect the stiaz aat notO above on line 10 through 12. This review procedure will result in a condition requidag a water quality facility wbich will satisfy the policies noted. EXHIBIT Q Z- PAGE -®F ~T&~ Zo 3~)vd N09380 MdW 8VEEZ89E0G LS:EI V66i/Ei/10 MINIM BE= . . PLANNING P19SUEIA 02, 233 S.E. WASHINGTON STREE , HiLLSBORO. OREGON 97123 PHONE: (503) 648-4061 FAX: (503) 681.7646 DATE: January 9, 1994 TO: Tigard City Council FROM: Ryan O'Brien, Planning Consultant SUBJECT: Rebuttal of Winterowd Planning Services Testimony on Albertson's Consolidated Land Use Application CPA 93-0009, ZCA 93-0003, CUP 93-0002, SDR a3-00 i w INTRODUCTION: At the request of the F'?operty Owner, Scott Russeil, I was requested to provide rebuttal comments to the Winterowd Planning Services Testimony regarding the Albertson's Consolidated Land Use Applications. This rebuttal will specifically address the Comprehensive Plan and the Specific Criteria of the C-C Community Commercial District. I am the principal of a planning, engineering and surveying firm with 32 employees. We have been involved in a number of shopping center and commercial development projects. I personally have 22 years of planning experience working with both government agencies and as a consultant to developers. My experience qualifies me to comment on the issues of the Comprehensive Plan and compliance with the Zoning Ordinance for this specific project. 1 was involved with the Commercial Zoning in this area from approximately 1981 to 1987 on the behalf of Russ Krueger. I worked with Russ on the initial negotiations between the City of Tigard and Washington County regarding location of the Neighborhood Commercial facility on 135th Avenue. Originally, the Commercial designation was four (4) acres in size in compliance with the Washington County Neighborhood Commercial Designation which allows up to 10 acre sites and 50,000 square foot grocery stores. At any time thereafter, the site could have been increased in size, depending upon presentation of market studies to the City to justify a larger acreage. A decision was made by Krueger not to oppose the 4 acre size of the Neighborhood Commercial Designation by Washington County because there wasn't much development in the area at that time and the site needed to be relocated to Scholls Ferry Road. They decided to wait until a specific user of the site was determined, and justify a larger size to the City to accommodate the needs of a grocery store shopping center. The 135th site was inappropriate because of the steep topographic grades and the lack of vehicular access. It was determined that Scholls Ferry Road was a much better site because of its significant locational characteristics to a larger market area. Although Washington County determined that four acres was appropriate for the area, the City of Tigard Staff agreed that the Commercial site was in the wrong location and that it should be moved to the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. At that time, Washington County did not agree with this concept and the property had to be annexed into the City before a Plan Amendment to relocate the Commercial Zoning could occur. 'r k EXHIMIT PAGE OF 4 i,y 9 After annexation to the City, the Commercial Zoning was moved to the northeast corner of Scholls Ferry RII am t_ae Murray Boulevard extension. The five acre size was only intended to be approximate because the final alignment of Murrc:; Boulevard was not determined at that time. Because of this known fact, it was assumed that if the Murray Boulevard extension, could be moved further to the south or north once the size of the Commercial could be either decreased or increased to encompass all of the remaining property available on the north side of Murray Boulevard. It was never the intent to leave a small portion of this site with a Single-Family Residential or Multiple-Family Residential zoning designation. In my opinion, the 6.93 acre size of the existing Commercial Site was intended by the City. There was no specific desire of the City to limit the size the Commercial to exactly five acres. Therefore, relocating this Commercial to the south side of Murray Boulevard and increasing the size to eight (8) acres is not only consistent with the CC Zone, but also consistent with the original recommendation of the City to provide an adequate size Commercial site in this area to accommodate the shopping needs of the neighborhood. In summary, the Albertson's Community Commercial Development Plan clearly meets the intent of the new CC Zone and adequately provides for the desire of both the City of Tigard and Washington County to locate a commercial facility that services the surrounding residential area. A substantial amount of residential land exists south Beaverton and west Tigard which will experience a large amount of the residential development in the near future. The need for an anchor grocery store with a small amount of additional retail service uses in this area is clear and is supported by evidence in the area. The adoption of the CC Zoning District by the City is very consistent with zones adopted by other cities and counties in other parts of the United States. These codes strongly encourage commercial development at one quadrant of an intersection of two collector streets, and are specifically intended to ~n~aurane r7av©lnrfmnnf of a n►nnonr stern to genre the daily ahnnninn ngmarlc of r=Q rlontc in the area and limit vehicular trips outside of a 1 to 2 mile neighborhood area. I have reviewed zoning ordinances that not only encourage the development of a grocery store, but in fact require the development of the grocery store at the same time or prior to development of any other commercial uses. This prevents development of other types of commercial uses such as a large drug store, home improvement center, or a larger depar"►ment store such as Fred Meyer. If the Albertson's store is not developed, then residents would drive to Scholls Ferry and shop at the other two grocery stores. As a result, traffic congestion will increase which impacts the livability of the neighborhood. By no stretch of the imagination could the Albertson's development possibly be considered "strip commercial development". Webster's Dictionary indicates the definition of "strip" as "a continuous series". The CC Zone automatically excludes strip commercial development because only one quadrant of a major intersection is allowed to be developed with commercial uses. This clearly eliminates other commercial uses within a half mile of the subject property, which automatically eliminates the possibility of strip commercial development. In all planning publicat?ons I have ever reviewed, strip commercial is clearly defined as a continuous strip of commercial development, generally on both sides of the street, with a multitude of uses and a wide variety of sizes and architectural character. Evidence of strip commercial is Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard, Canyon Road and Beaverton Hillsdale Highway in Beaverton, 82nd Avenue in Portland, and Tualatin Valley (TV) Highway in Aloha and the City of Hillsboro. Strip commercial uses generally have limited depth, inadequate parking, buildings close to the road, uncoordinated signage, poor architectural quality, uncoordinated variety of colors and architectural treatment, inefficient development patterns, negative traffic; impacts, multiple driveways, inefficient use of crossover circulation between adjacent parking lots, and many other unsightly and inefficient development patterns considered to be undesirable by both planners and government agency officials. o_ -a 2 2 EXHIBIT PAGE ®F r !111111 lialigI REM During my past experience with grocery store deveiopmants, an accap.t:,d rule for grocery store market demand Is approximately five square feet of grocery store building area per person. Therefore, a 40,000 square foot grocery store would require approximately 8,000 people to be efficiently used. In this specific case, the record indicates that actual build-out densities within one and one-half miles of the subject property has resulted in 6,331 dwelling units, with a projected population of 16,900, which is almost twice the amount necessary for a grocery store of this size (Page 8 of Applicant's Statement with Exhibit "N"). Documentation of the 5 square feet person is provided by the attached Exhibit i. This exhibit was taksn ,m-Or: a atudA of existing oracery stores in the eastern Washington County area. Although the 1980 census population of 228,215 people was used, additional stores have developed in Washington County and no consideration occurred for the small country grocery stores In the rest of the County. The existing population of Washington County is closer to 300,000; however, approximately 330,000 square feet of stores have been added to this inventory for a total of 1,531,100 square feet, which still adds up to approximately 5 square feet per person. The new stores are as follows: 50,000 SF Safeway in Hillsboro; 20,000 SF added to Safeway in Tanasbourne Mall; 50,000 SF Albertson's in King City; 50,000 SF Albertson's on 185th Avenue and Walker Road; 40,000 SF Thriftway at Murray Hill; 30,000 SF expansion of7hriftway on Cornell Road in West Hills; 50,000 SF grocery store section of Costco; 40,000 SF Tradewell on TV Highway in Aloha. This development is consistent with the original Washington County Neighborhood Commercial designation of up to 10 acres in size. Washington County thoroughly studied the Neighborhood Commercial designation and determined the need to develop grocery stores in the NC Zone with easy access to neighborhoods without driving significant distances. Washington County chose a spacing of one mile. They also increased the maximum grocery store size to 50,000 square feet to meet the modern development needs of grocery store outlets in Washington County. This determination resulted from identification of grocery store trends over the last 10 years. The City of Tigard chose 40,000 square feet as a maximum size, which is the absolute minimum size for a modern grocery store. Albertson's has chosen to live within this grocery store size. Based on pure function and efficiency, there is a need to develop additional retail uses and services with a grocery store to compliment convenient shopping needs of the community. The 8 acre maximum land area and 100,000 square foot maximum floor of the Code demonstrates that the City assumes this will occur.The Albertson's Plan complies with the City's assumption and will meet the daily shopping needs of residents in the area for many years into the future. Because of its strategic location, it provides easy access for all surrounding neighborhoods. It is properly separated from adjacent residential uses and designed to be well integrated within the neighborhood. The primary purpose of t %e CC Zone appears to encourage a grocery store up to 40,000 square feet with specialty retail and service uses to complement the grocery store. The Albertson's center clearly meets this intent. It is very important to distinguish this Community Commercial facility from other major shopping centers such as Washington Square, strip commercial along Pacific Highway, and downtown area City of Tigard. Each of these areas function separately and have no specific relationship. Washington Square provides a wide variety of specialty shops and major department stores; downtown Tigard and Pacific Highway provide specialty shops, service uses and a wide variety of other types of commercial uses that are not necessarily appropriate in the CC Zone. The Albertson's shopping center is dedicated to a grocery store and very limited other retail uses only for the convenience of the neighborhood on a daily basis. The center is substantially different from other commercial areas cited above, and will have no negative impact on these other uses and specifically downtown Tigard. - 3 90110111T PAGE 5i Ransom The Code clearly requires the design of the Albertson's center to be compatible with the neighborhood and aesthetically pleasing. However, ine Coae is not Inte ii to change the ..__.g.. and function of grocery stores and other uses, but merely guide the design for compatibility with the neighborhood. No changes to the Albertson's site plan or design is necessary to be in full compliance with the CC Zone. Further, it is not necessary for this development to be unique, unusual, or substantially different in design from other Community Commercial or 8 to 10 Acre Neighborhood Commercial sites developed in Washington County. This development pattern and design is fairly standard and generally the type developed on one quadrant of a major intersection. Deviationo from this design may result in inefficient and ue leconoirrilcal us -0 cf thle s'te. Thic fart was clearly demonstrated by the Tanasbourne Mall which was designed as a "community center" or "college campus" with extensive pedestrian access and large open spaces in the interior. As a result, the facility was torn down and replaced with a conventional commercial building and parking lot specifically designed to efficiently serve shopping needs of residents in the area in contrast to a monument of architectural style and unique design. The proposed Albertson's commercial center design provides customers easy access and definitely does not discourage pedestrian and bicycle traffic. In fact, sidewalks are provided in the perimeter of the site. Additional pathways in the parking lot would never be used. Customers park their cars and walk the shortest and most direct distance to the grocery store and other commercial uses. There is no need to reduce the number of parking spaces. Adequate capacity is necessary for peak houi- shopping periods. Any reduction in parking spaces would have a negative impact on the neighborhood and affect the customers without any corresponding benefit. The uses are separated by the parking lot to provide efficient use of parking spaces rather than creating high competition of parking spaces close to the front of the building if all commercial uses were located in the same building. ' Further, dispersing the commercial uses on the site creates a more interesting and visually pleasing layout. COMPLIANCE WITH THE TICARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TCP 4 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL COMMENT: Contrary to Winterowd's comments, the purpose of the Community Commercial designation does not eliminate orientation for automobile traffic. In contrast, the CC Purposes intended to encourage retail and service uses with neighborhood orientation. The Albertson's project is specifically designed for neighborhood orientation and also to service the shopping needs of the community. Because of its small size, it will not attract a large amount of trade outside a 1 to 1.5 mile radius. As indicated in the Introduction, the center is definitely not a typical commercial strip development. Community Commercial facilities, such as the Albertson's at Hall and Greenway in Beaverton, have developed in Washington County. These shopping centers have functional designs which service the neighborhood but are definitely not strip commercial development. The Albertson's design does not give the appearance of strip commercial because of the location at one quadrant of the intersection, significant landscaping, and significant setbacks of the buildings from Scholis Ferry Road, Northview Drive and Walnut Street. 4 EXHIBIT PAGE -OF r5~- 17 Contrary to Winterowd's comments, the plan meets the intent and purpose of the CC in the Tigard Zoning Ordinance by promot€ng a pedestrian and bicycle friendly development. The intent and purpose of the CC Zone is cieariy to accommodate the shopping needs of the neighborhood and does not require the entire site to be designed around bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The buildings are significantly set back from the public streets other than Northview Drive, which contains the small width portion of the Albertson's building. Locating all the commercial along the Scholls Ferry Road, Walnut and Northview Drive street frontages, as Kriterowd suggests, with parking in the center `would° give the appearance of strip commercial development. TCP 4.A SCALE COMMENT: The building floor area of Commercial Centers in the CC Zone can range from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet which definitely assumes the type of development proposed by Albertson's. The market area is 1.5 miles, which was clearly defined in the Applicant's submittal material. Even if patrons drive one or two miles to visit this store, the need for a grocery store in this specific area is vitally important to satisfy the shopping needs of surrounding neighborhood. If no grocery store is developed in this area, then customers would have to drive to Scholls Ferry Road where two other grocery stores are located, which increases traffic and congestion and leads to overload of the existing grocery stores and causes patrons to drive even further to other grocery stores outside of Tigard. This approach would not be reasonable and would negatively affect people that live in this area without any corresponding benefit to the City. TCR 4.13 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA COMMENT: Contrary to Winterowd's suggestion, the Albertson's and Blockbuster Video complex should not be shifted 90 degrees to face Northview Drive. Such a design change would be disastrous and totally out of character of any reasonable planning principal for adequate and functional commercial development. Northview is a local residential street and all vehicular traffic should be encouraged from Walnut and Scholls Ferry Road. The design of the building provides the least impact to the existing single-family residents in the area, and provides the best orientation for easy access in and out of the site for the convenience of the 15,000 people that will be served by this facility. Further, any redesign of this site would be virtually possible based on reasonable engineering standards. The south end of the Albertson's store adjacent to Northview Drive is approximately 35 feet lower than Northview Drive which completely eliminates the side view of the building from the existing residential uses. The north end of the building adjacent to Northview Drive is approximately two feet above the existing street. The entire south portion of the shopping center was lowered and the northern end of the site will be raised to provide parking lot grades at 5% or less on a flat building pad for the Albertson's store. Increasing the slope of the parking lot would be inconvenient and unsafe for the shoppers. Steeper grades cause difficulty for customers opening and closing car doors, maneuvering in and out of parking spaces during icy and wet conditions, and getting in and out of cars. Therefore, the only option for development of the site is locating the Albertson's store at the southeast corner as shown on the development plans. E KHIBIT 5 PAGE ~-OF I5~ The multlple4amlly property to the south can be developed with a multitude of building types even though WintZ;.d claims that the shape is not appropriate for multiple-family development. To _ _.._..II amio wn, d4iwln_fFmihi land would heimmannnable and &acnTlCe Sne COmRli3fcitti area sIvl a an lan ul l wi+rs i.wwi, .....,..ri y significantly impact the functional use of the commercial site. A site plan is attached showing an example of how 92 units can be developed on the property at a density of 22 units per acre based on 3.95 acres and 29 units per acre if the 3.15 acres outlined "buildable area" shown on the attached map is used (See Exhibit 2). A large amount of landscaping is provided around and within the interior of the shopping center site. CX[ePiS1 . ` _VE3 F)fiiBd Q Onuala cI_ _x! .w* .+w... ohf. A;+^ ...h.i~.S. 'it _a , In menre, isl than flat site approximately YII II?I• . 1% - 5 to 7 acres in size. The 8 acres reques.ted i.s necessary- in order to provide adequate parking, support service uses, and accommodate extra landscaping with necessary and the cuts and fills to make the site functionally safe for pedestrians as well as vehicular traffic. TCP 4.B.4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT Convenient pedestrian and bicycle access is provided throughout the development. Access points are coordinated to meet both City of Tigard and Washington County requirements. However, no access is provided on Northview Drive to eliminate future conflicts with a local residential street that is not designed to carry any commercial vehicle traffic outside of the immediate neighborhood. Therefore, no driveway shoull be provided along Northview Drive. Further, the design and characteristics such as landscaping, lighting, signs, architectural character of the buildings has been submitted with this application which meet the standards and purpose of the CC Zone. Winterowd's comments about a "mythical" mistake is not founded by fact. The record is clear that a 6.93 acre site commercial zone exists across the street from the proposed Albertson's development, and was intended to be developed with a commercial center. However, the City did not have a CC Zone at that time which properly addressed the current needs' for a grocery store facility with other associated service and retail uses comparable to the Washington County NC Zone which allows 50,000 square foot grocery stores on 10 acre sites. Prior history regarding the relocation of the commercial from Walnut and 135th is not relative to this case, only the last decision of the Tigard City Council which designated 6.93 acres as commercial. This application is merely a request to relocate this commercial to the other side of the road, which still provides the same functional use within a 1.5 mile radius and meets the intent and purpose of the CC Zone. If the CC Zone had been in effect when the last decision was made to rezone tho 6.93 acres, then that property would have been zoned CC. The only decision in this case is the location of the CC Zone on the north or south side of Walnut Street. The site plan and evidence in the record clearly demonstrates the south side of Walnut Street as more appropriate than the north side. This premise is further supported by direct access to Scholls Ferry Road is achieved, as well as access to Walnut Street, which cuts down the amount of turning movements at the intersection of Walnut and Scholls Ferry Road and achieves better dispersion of traffic, and opportunities for more customers to utilize this facility. EXHIBIT 6 PAGE -OF icy Jill I MOM COMPLIANCE WITH THETIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE C-C COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT This section of the rebuttal deals with specific comments about thG pewpose of the CC District, as well as specific criteria. The purpose of the CC Zone was divided into nine section with separate comments for each section. COMMENT: 1Minterowd did not provide anv comments about compliance or non-compliance with the intent and purpose of the Community Development Code. His comments only relate to the standards of the CC Zone without reference to the Purpose of the CC Zone. It is impossible to determine compliance with the standards of the CC Zone without considering the substantial written material contained in the Purpose of the CC Zone. The following are specific comments related to the Purpose of the CC Zone which are very relevant in relation to understanding how a specific development complies with the standards of the CC Zone. 18.62.010 PURPOSE 1. The purpose of the C-C (Community Commercial) Zoning District Is to provide locations for convenience shopping facilities that provide for the'regular needs of residents of nearby residential neighborhoods. It is intended that the community commercial center be ideally developed as a unit with adequate off-street parking for customers and employees, and with appropriate landscaping and screening to insure compatibility with the surrounding residential environment. Gross floor area In community commercial centers typically range from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet, and land area ranges between 2 to 8 acres. COMMENT: The Albertson's shopping center clearly provides for the regular needs of the residents of the nearby neighborhoods. Adequate off-street parking is provided with appropriate landscaping and screening to insure compatibility of surrounding residential environment. The floor area is less than 100,000 square feet and the land are does not exceed 8 acres. Therefore, this development complies with the design standards clearly shows compliance with the above CC Zone purpose. 2. Community commercial centers are intended to be separated from other commercially zoned properties which provide retail and service opportunities by at least one-half mile. COMMENT: The subject property is in excess of one-half mile from the Murray Hill Shopping Center and approximately 1.5 miles from Howard's Thriftway on Scholls Ferry Road. It is also 1.2 miles from the proposed commercial site at the western intersection of Old and New Scholls Ferry Roads adjacent to the Urban Growth Boundary. No other anticipated commercial sites will develop in the area other than the subject property unless significant justification occurs and future development applications prove the need for additional commercial facilities. The existing Albertson's store will satisfy shopping needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. No additional commercial shopping centers like the Albertson's center will develop within one-half mile of the subject property. Therefore, this dev~.lopment is in compliance with the above purpose. EXHIBIT 7 PAGE -OF 3. The dneignation of a site with this district should not create or contribute to a commercial strip development pattern. 71 COMMENT: As indicated in the Introduction, development of the subject properly will not oreate or con.ributo to a commercial strip development pattern. Since there are no other commercial sites adjacent to the subject property, and only one quadrant of the major intersection is proposed for development, it is impossible to create a strip development pattern. The CC Zone anticipates a grocery store up to 40;000 square fe®t anci other cnrrwmcrrinl fac...ti-- vr t„ tOt V ivv, vv 5ta'tiaaiti fee[. Cieariy, the proposed development is significantly less than the maximum intended in the CC Zone and the CC CC Zone was clearly drafted with a specific purpose and standards to eliminate the option of strip commercial development. Therefore, this development complies with the above purpose. 4. This district Is Intended to be located adjacent to several residential neighborhoods, ideally at the Intersection of two or more major collector streets or at the intersection of an arterial and a collector street. COMMENT: This project is located adjacent to several residential neighborhoods and a+. the intersection of two major collector streets. However, this section of the Code does not require location at two major collector streets, only that ideally it should be located at such an intersection. Because Walnut Street and Scholls Ferry Road are the only collector streets in the area, the subject property is the only site that can be zoned CC. Therefore, it complies with the above purpose. 5. The district is to be applied in only one quadrant of an intersection. COMMENT: Only one quadrant of the intersection is proposed for development. This eliminates the potential for development of commercial uses on the other three quadrants of the intersection, which in turn eliminates the potential for strip commercial development. 6. The intended service area of the district Is up to 1.5 miles from a site. COMMENT: Information in the record clearly indicates that in excess of 16,000 people are located within one-half mile of the site. Adequate access is available to the site in all directions and a sufficient number of people live in the area to use this grocery store. Because of the design of the center as a neighborhood facility, there is no intention by the developer to attract customers beyond the 1.5 mile radius. Although some customers may drive further than. the 1.5 miles to use the store, some residents within one-half or up to 1.5 miles from the subject property will still use other stores in the area even though the Albertson's store is closer because of customer preference. This additional Albertson's grocery store will provide reasonable opportunities for residents in the area to choose in which store they want to shop. Restricting development of the subject property would restrict trade and therefore reduce shopping opportunities for customers in the area. EXHIBIT PAGE OI - 8 i .5 s~ T. The community commercial development shall be compatible with surrounding uses as determ!n-- j H.."ou .1. st,a conformance with the site and building design lstandards contained In this Section, contemporaneous with, and a part of, the approval of a zone change to the community commercial designation. The site plan approval may include conditions relating to site and building development through conditions of approval of a zone change for the site or through the Site Development Review process. Such consideration's clay Includa, but are not limited to, access limitations, special setbacks, increased landscaping or bufferlnny' Mnxss- en of!-s_c_:t parking apaces, and saeoW deiilon considerations Tor pedestrian and bicyclist access. This Chapter shall provide building and site design guidelines and mandatory site design standards intended to minimize site development Impacts on surrounding residential neighborhoods and to promote pedestrian and bicyclist friendly development. COMMENT: The Introduction and Compliance with the CC Zone Standards demonstrates compliance with the above purpose. Compatibility with the existing single-family and potential future multiple-family housing is demonstrated by compliance with the CC Zone development standards. The City has the opportunity to approve this development with conditions to assure compatibility with surrounding uses. Such considerations "may" include access limitations, special setbacks, increased landscaping and buffering, limits on off-street parking, and special design considerations for pedestrian and bicycle access. The Code does not require a unique design which is completely centered around pedestrian/bicycle access as Winterowd suggests. Although pedestrian/bicycle access is encouraged by this design, the primary design is for vehicle traffic because of the 1.5 mile market radius. The site plan has been designed with full consideration of pedestrian/bicycle access, although adequate vehicle access has also been provided. The above purpose of the CC Zone also indicates that specific design standards are contained in the Code to minimize impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods and to promote pedestrian/bicycle and friendly development. In all cases, the proposed site plan meets this intent and purpose. 8. It is preferable that a community commercial site be developed as one unit with coordinated access, circulation, building design, signage, and landscaping. Parcels within a community commercial site may be developed independently; however, the City imay require that developmental aspects of individual parcels be coordinated through the development review process. Access needs of individual parcels and uses shall be coordinated within a site so as to limit the number of access driveways to adjacent streets. COMMENT: This development is designed as one unit with coordinated access and other design facilities. The Code allows individual parcels to be developed independently, which is more in keeping of the t typical strip commercial development. To avoid this situation, the City may require a development review process in consideration of access in a coordinated manner. In this specific case, only one site is proposed for development rather than multiple sites, and a complete coordinated design program has been presented to the City for review. Therefore, this development is in complete compliance with the purpose and intent. EXHIBIT PAGE ~OF 9 ' f57 9. W!th op.oa.. se+v u1aer w a p~rrntZFy' neighborhood orientation rather than to the traveling public, signage will be strictly limited in size and height. COMMENT: Signage is limited in size and height and is compatible with the size and scope of the project. 16.61.020 PROCEDURES AND APPROVAL (PROCESS B. It is also Incumbent upon the applicant for conditional use approval to demonstrate that the Intended use Is consistent with the purposes of the Community Commercial Zone and that the proposed use will not alter the character of the surrounding area in a manner which substantially limits, impairs, or precludes the use of surrounding properties for the primary uses listed in the underlying district(s). COMMENT: Winterowd's testimony does not specifically cover compliance with the above section. However, references to compliance with the Development Standards relates to compliance with Subsection B above. This section of the Code clearly requires the Applicant to demonstrate compliance with the purpose of the CC Zone. The applicant is required to demonstrate that the proposed use will not alter the character of the surrounding area in a manner which substantially limits, impairs, or precludes the use of surrounding properties for the primary use listed in the underlying district(s). In this case, a single-family residential development has already occurred in the area and no evidence exists to demonstrate that the multiple-family property to the south would not develop because of the commercial uses. On the contrary, when locating multiple-family development adjacent to a shopping center it is very important to provide pedestrian access and to eliminate vehicle trips. The attached Exhibit 2 shows a potential multiple-family layout at 92 units per acre to meet the Code requirement of 25 units per acre. It is impossible to design the Albertson's store to directly face the multiple-family development. In contrast, it is necessary to provide proper buffering between multiple-family and the commercial development, but still provide pedestrian access along Northview Street directly into this commercial development. Substantial residential development has occurred in the area and will continue to occur whether or not this shopping center is developed. Other shopping centers like the proposed site have developed in the area including Howard's Thriftway and Murray Hill on Scholls Ferry Road, and Albertson's at Greenway and Hall Boulevard with no impacts that precluded adjacent residential development. In conclusion, the previous section of this section of the report clearly demonstrates compliance with the intent and purpose of the CC Zone and is relevant to the standard above. C. The Site Development Review or Conditional Use plan approval shall include review of the proposed development's consistency with the site, building, and sign design guidelines and standards of Section 18.61.055. Conditions of approval of the development plan may also include, but are not limited to, any of the site and building design guidelines deemed appropriate to be mandatory, access limitations, special setbacks, increased landscaping or buffering, limits on off-street parking spaces, coordinated building design, and special design considerations for pedestrian and bicyclist access and safety as determined to be necessary to assure compatibility with existing or potential: neighboring uses. EXHIBIT PAGE -OF ~r--- 10 , t~Y s III Ig IIIIJIIII111111 Is COMMENT: All The Winterowd report testimony did not specifically address the above Code section. `However, 10 these concepts were addressed in compliance with the development standards. Again, this section of the Code indicates that conditions of approval "gray" include special design considerations, but it is not mandatory. Mandatorv requirements are itsted M the CC Zo;,c. Cr .erica. Thia VVIr aerowa report tends to read additional standards and criteria into the CC Zone that do not exist on a mandatory or oven a suggestive basis. The City Council must 4oilow ihiese very restrictive design criteria before the development can be approved. The design criteria must be determined by the City Council and Is not up to interpretation or preconceived ideas by an outside planning consultant relating to pedestrian and bicycle compatibility and orientation of the buildings towards residential areas. The key words in the above Section C is "as determined to be necessary to assure compatibility with existing or potential neighboring uses". In this specific case, the level of design considerations for pedestrian and bicycle access and safety is solely determined at the discretion of the Tigard City Council based on appropriate design measures. These design considerations cannot be determined by specific ideas and beliefs of a planning consultant that has no demonstrated qualifications to design commercial shopping centers of this size, or to clearly establish what is necessary in order to serve the 16,000 people within a one-half mile radius that will be using the center. In my opinion, this shopping center is properly designed and provides all the design features necessary to provide compatibility with adjacent and surrounding residential neighborhoods. Albertson's and the architects involved with this case have been experienced with thousands of shopping centers throughout the Western United States and possess a very good understanding of functional needs for bicycle, pedestrian and vehicle access, as well as maximum convenience for patrons of the shopping center. Their design ideas regarding "appropriate development" of the site should carry substantial weight in the review by the City Council because they are the experts in this field. A poor design of this shopping center would result in loss of customers, inefficient parking layouts, high competition for parking spaces and general inconvenience. Customers don't want to wait or walk long distances to commercial uses and will use other grocery stores if the site is inconvenient. A substantial grade cut occurs at the south end of the site which eliminates the possibility for any access or fronting the development on Northview Drive. This substantial grade cut preserves the views from the existing single-family homes and potential future multiple-family development and substantially limits the impact. Based upon this information, the development plan meets the development criteria above. 61.055 SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN GUIDELINES/STANDARDS A. Design Guidelines The following design guidelines are strongly encouraged for developments within the C-C (Community Commercial) district. Conditions of approval of the development plan may include, but are not limited to, any of the site and building design guidelines deemed appropriate to be mandatory. EXHIBIT 11 PAGE ®F COMMENT: The following Design Guidelines are not required but are strongly encouraged for developments in the CC Zone. Again, the Code indicates that conditions of approval "may" include the following as deemed appropriate. Winterowd ela a ;,!;a imnp, -Ssian That these design guidelines are absolute and mandatory. The following is rebuttal to the Winterowd testimony: a. The design of buildings within a community commercial development should Incorporate elements such as special architectural details, distinctive color schemes, special art and other features, which are sensitive to and enhance the surrounding area and serve to distinguish the complex from other retail complexes in the city. COMMENT: Contrary to Winterowd's comments, this commercial development is not a typical strip or power shopping center. This neighborhood commercial facility is intended to primarily service the daily shopping needs of residents in the surrounding area. This development is not a strip mall like Fred Meyer on Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway and Highway 217, or Washington Square. It is a specialty commercial development with a grocery store and a few small service retail uses. The primary use of the site will be automobile oriented, which is identical to any other neighborhood commercial development in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Winterowd claims that the above standard does not allow automobile oriented uses. In contrast, the requirement for location at the intersection of two major collector streets automatically qualifies the center to be automobile oriented in order to reduce traffic through residential areas. Adequate access is required for a center of this size with the location at the intersection of two collector streets. There is no requirement that the development be unique; rather, the requirement is for special architectural details to distinguish it from a conventional strip commercial development compared to Pacific Highway. In this case, distinctive architectural features have been provided. The design is distinguished from other retail complexes in the City of Tigard by its location at one quadrant of the intersection and special landscape features. This design is definitely different from most strip commercial development compared to Pacific Highway and more in keeping with the distinctive characteristics of the Murray Hill shopping center, although it is much smaller in size. Substantial breakup of the site plan is provided by the two 4,000 square foot pads at the intersections of Northview Drive and Scholls Ferry Road with the unique landscaping at the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. The design and amount of landscaping will make this complex different from standard strip commercial developments. Winterowd claims that lego-like design with long blank walls and no windows is not appropriate for this area. Supermarkets must be designed with one front entrance and with adequate room on the sides and the rear for the mechanical equipment and warehousing. No grocery store in the Metropolitan Area has ever been built which is significantly different than this design. There is no need to provide a special interior floor plan with a substantial amount of windows around the sides of the building just for the sake of design. Although a small blank wall exists along Northview Drive adjacent to the residential area, substantial landscaping with a 30 to 35 foot grade cut is provided to create a breakup of, the blank wall. Orienting the building in any other direction would be more of ar, impact to the residents along Northview Drive than the•current design. No vehicle access is pro aded off Northview Drive which provides further separation between the shopping center and existing residential area. A substantial grade differential exists between multiple-family to the south and the existing loading dock and mechanical equipment area of the supermarket. This buffer is substantial and provides adequate separation and screening between this development and the 12 1EXHIBIT PAGE -.OF 1ls~ J 1; V Mill a W-01 1. ME multiple-family. Multiple-family Is fairly tolerant of these types of uses because they are normally located on major thoroughfares and s ionn freeways and -a-co t large shnnninn rontR►S, Therefore, this project meets the above building design guideline. Winterowd makes the comment that this development is the same as the Hillman Development in Springfield with small pads In front and the large Albertson's grocery store in back with a large parking lot. Winterowd is correct in this statement because this design is the standard_ for development of neighborhood or community commercial shopping centers because this design has proven to be the most efficient and economical to provide easy access in and out of the grocery store for the customers. Deviations from this standard would create an inefficient design and create unsafe traffic patterns. Further, the design changes he suggests would be devastating to the owners of the center and impact thousands of customers 20 to 30 years into the future without any public benefit. Winterowd incorrectly identifies specific characteristics of a standard strip mail design which is automobile oriented. The contention is that since other shopping centers have been developed along major thoroughfares such as 82nd Avenue in Portland, TV Highway in Aloha and Hillsboro, and Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway in Beaverton with a grocery store, Payless Drug Store and other stores on either side with pads in the front, that all such designs are strip commercial. This argument fails because these centers are developed along strip commercial streets with additional commercial on all sides, including street access, which adds to the strip commercial design. When a project is designed at one quadrant of an intersection with compatible architectural character, it is no longer a strip commercial development and therefore does not qualify as strip commercial with under the arguments presented by Winterowd. b. All buildings within a multi-building complex should achieve a unity of design through the use of similar architectural elements, such as roof Ask form, exterior building materials, colors, and window pattern. COMMENT: Winterowd claims that since specific designs are not provided for Blockbuster Video or the two 4,000 square foot pads along Walnut Street that the project cannot be approved. In contrast, the Code does not require the entire site to be developed at the same time. It allows incremental development as identified in Purpose 8 of the CC Zone, but identifies the preference of the City that the site be developed as one unit. The important aspect is the need for architectural compatibility. This report demonstrates that architectural compatibility of the remaining buildings will occur when specific development plans are presented for those sites in the future. It is difficult to tie tenants down at this premature date because the zoning has not been approved and the developer has no real assurance the site will be approved for development. Once approved, other users can be found and specific design plans can be submitted. Subsection B does not require that all buildings be reviewed at the same time, but that all buildings achieve the same unity of design. This can always be demonstrated at a later date. At that point, the City can either reject or approve specific architectural design based upon the above standard. 13 PAGE OF ~ ~I c. Individual buildings should Incorporate similar design elements, such as surface materials, color, roof treatment, windows and doors, on all sides e* the building to achieve a unity of design. 'The sides of a building which face toward a public streei ah....:d !ne4urin i9uh!1c entrances to the building and windows to provide visual access to the activity within h& building. The sides of a building which face toward an adjoining property, but not toward a public street, should include elements such as windows, doom, color, texture, landscaping or wall treatment to provide visual Interest and prevent the development of a long continuous blank wall. COMMENT: Winterowd has misinterpreted the Code by indicating individual building designs must be submitted with this application to determine if the standard has been met. The Code does not require similar design elements in the buildings, but does indicate that buildings "should" incorporate similar design elements. If this point was taken to the extreme, it would be impossible to ever add to a community commercial development by increasing the acreage from two acres to eight acres or improved, add or redevelop any buildings in the future because the buildings were not presented for design review at the initial zone change level. In the future, it would be relatively easy for the City to determine if the architecture of the buildings on the adjoining pads are compatible with the Albertson's store, the character of the area and the landscaping. Additionally, the standard indicates that there should be a unity of design, but does not specifically indicate the type of design; therefore, the above standard has been met. Winterowd's comments that this development does not meet the above standard because the east wall facing Northview Drive has neither windows or doors to provide visual access to the grocery store and there is no public entrance a!ong Northview Drive. As indicated before, there is no need to provide a second access into the grocery store. This access would be impossible because grade conflicts and would negatively impact the adjacent residential uses. It is impossible to add door or windows on the side because of space requirements for equipment and storage. The proper orientation of the building is towards Walnut Street and Scholls Ferry Road, rather than Northview Drive. For maximum compatibility and separation of this shopping center from adjacent single-family residential uses, no driveway entrances should be located on Northview Drive. The above standard does not require all sides of the building to have windows and doors to achieve unity of design, but it does require similar design elements on all sides of the building. In this case, the Albertson's store does provide unity of design on all sides of the building, including the rear of the building facing the multiple4amily. Because of the substantial separation between the rear of the building and multiple- family site, adequate buffering exists. Although the Code states that the sides of a buildings that face a public street should include public entrances and windows to provide visual access to the activity within the building, it is not a requirement. Providing an active access with windows and entrance along Northview Drive wc~. 7 provide greater impact to the existing residential area than the current design. Additionally, grade conflicts exist which precludes such a design. Therefore, that design concept should be rejected by the City Council. To change the functional use of a grocery stare merely to provide visual aesthetics for an adjacent multiple4amily development is beyond the scope and design guidelines of the CC Zone. Substantial opportunities exist on the multiple-family property to provide additional buffers and separation. Therefore, changes to the building plan are not necessary in order to provide full compliance with Subsection C above. EXHIB T / 14 PAGE _OF A NMI The Code Indicates that the sides of a building which face an adjoining property should Include elements such as windows, doors, color, texture, landscaping or wall treatment to provide visual interest and prevent the development of along continuous blank wall. In this case, the Code dons not require windows and doors, but merely makes suggestions on design treatments to help reduce the impact of a long blank wall. In this case, the only long blank wall is the rear of the building which is impossible to be developed with doors and windows. Because of mechanical equipment needs a ve^" !arele but bank exists in this area to properly separate it from the multiple-family area. Architectural treatment is provided to break up the wall and substantial landscaping will be insiaiied. Therefore, this standard has been met, contrary to the arguments presented by Winterowd. 2. General Site Design Guidelines a. Loading areas should not be located on the side of a building which faces toward a residential use. Loading areas, if located between the building and the street, should be; oriented away from the street and should be screened to minimize views of the loading area from the street and sidewalk. COMMENT: Although the Code does not prohibit loading areas from facing residential use, it strongly encourages that this design characteristic should not occur. The Code also states that if loading areas are located between the building and street they should be oriented away from the street and screened to minimize views from the street and sidewalk. In this specific case, orienting the loading area to the south is more appropriate compared to Northview Drive, Scholls Ferry Road, or Walnut Street. A substantial grade differential exists between the Multiple-Family and loading area with a large landscaped buffer area. Although the Multiple-Family site is a residential use, it is not the same as single-family owner occupied housing on a flat property with no buffering. Multiple-Family users are _ generally transient and generally do, not stay in one location more than two to three years and can tolerate living next to his loading area. If annoyances occur, then the owners can always move out of their multiple-family units to another multiple-family development. The loading area has to be located on one side of the building and opposite the store entrance. The location shown on the site plan is the most appropriate with the least amount of impacts to the adjacent single-family residential area. Therefore, this design complies with the above guideline. Contrary to the comments provided by Winterowd, the 3.95 acre R-25 site is not impractical to develop because of the multitude of designs for individual units and the ability to provide creative parking lots. Almost any property an be developed with multiple-family housing. This is especially true since newer apartment complexes are generally eight-plexes with four units on the bottom floor and four units on the top with separate entrances on each of the four sides of the building. Th--se buildings are generally clustered around parking lots, rather than the conventional townhouse design with units in a row with parking directly in front of the unit, which is an older type of design that is not necessarily developed today with modern apartment complexes. These cluster designs allow substantial landscaping around units and do not have parking spaces necessarily directly in front of the unit. The 3.95 acre site can easily be developed with those newer type multiple-family units. With conventional 8 to 12 plexes with 2 to 3 stories as shown by the Exhibit 3. This plan is an example of what could develop and contains 92 units at 23 units per acre. EYNIBIT 15 PAGE -.OF 1~3 1 t Although strip malls, as Winterowd indicates, are generai'sy developed wit, parking In main street with buildings in the back, the proposed development is not a strip mall. In contrast, it is a community commercial center with an efficient parking pattern to service the grocery store as well as the adjacent retail uses. Adequate pedestrian access is provided into the site for adjacent residential development and the design does not need to be changed in order to meet the Oregon State Transportation Rule. The CC Zone Design Guidelines ara intended to meet the Transportation Rule and compliance with the guidelines automatically demonstrates compliance with the Oregon Transportation Rule. Placing the Albertson's store at the corner of Walnut Street and Northview Drive with direct pedestrian access into the building from either Northview or Walnut Street is impossible and impractical and will not necessarily encourage any additional pedestrian and bicycle traffic. In fact, more confusion would be generated by the development which would cause significantly longer distances for people to walk from the parking lot to the front of the store. It has already been demonstrated in this report that only one entrance into the store can occur based upon the interior floor plan in grocery stores with mechanical equipment and storage. To redesign the building only to place the mechanical equipment and the loading facilities away from Northview Drive, is impractical and impossible. The current design provides the loading and mechanical equipment in the area with the least impact to residential areas. An efficient design will be inconvenient for customers and cause them to shop elsewhere which defeats the primary purpose of the CC Zone. As indicated by Winterowd, the plan has an additional 44 parking spaces more than required by the Code. This extra parking is necessary for peak loads. This development should not be denied additional parking spaces merely to encourage bicycle and pedestrian access. The relationship of an additional 44 parking spaces has no bearing on pedestrian and bicycle access, except if the enure parking lot was filled and people found that they could not drive their cars to the shopping center because the parking lots were filled. The CC Zone does not have this goal in any of the standards or in the purpose of the CC Zone. W.-terowd is in error by indicating that five acres is sufficient to accommodate proposed development. The Site Plan has been presented and significant grade differentials exist on the site which need landscaped cut and fill slopes. The design only has an additional 44 parking spaces and a limited amount of commercial uses. Therefore, it would be impossible to develop this site if only five acres were available. If this project does not develop, the only persons impacted would be the 15,000 people who live around this property that will use this facility on a daily basis for shopping needs. This would be unfair and extremely inconvenient for the people that live in the area. Reorienting the building to reduce impact of the loading and mechanical area to the multiple-family development for that purpose only would be extremely inefficient and accomplish very little compared to the significant impact on functional use of the site convenience for the 15,000 people that will use this shopping center. Therefore, any consideration by the City Council to request redesign of the center should be weighed against the convenience, safety and access of the projected 15,000 users. 3. Design Standards The fallowing mandatory design standards apply within the community commercial district: 1. Internal Walkways. EXHIBIT v r I 16 PAGE OF ' I~~ 17 a. Walkways, eight feet minimum width, shall be provided from the _.A.11v 'v:vd::.°.IIC Cr r1reht.nf.wav to the buildinals). At a minimum, walkways shall be located to connect focus points of pedestrian activity such as transit stops and street crossings to the major building entry points. COMMENT: ° I—= In . dith access 4ha ht,ildings from the public street. This access to P'eGlE3$!'Ititt VYestotn °'-'•-~aya wro v connect to a focus point in the development and potential transit stops, street crossings and major building entry points. b. Walkways, five feet minimum width, shall be provided to connect with walkways or potential walkway locations on adjoining properties to create an integrated internal walkway system along the desired lines of pedestrian travel. The width of the walkway should be commensurate with the anticipated level of pedestrian activity along the connecting walkway. COMMENT: Five foot walkways are provided in compliance with the Code. Additional walkways in the parking lots are not necessary because customers will always take the shortest distances from their vehicle to the entrance of a building and will not use a large number off-site walkways. All grocery store shopping centers are designed with pedestrian walking the parking lot, and no impacts have ever been demonstrated that would cause the need for additional walkways in the interior of the parking lot other than the walkways presented by the applicants. The walkways along Walnut Street and Scholis Ferry Road will provide a focal point as a community resource. I. Walkways shall be provided along the full length of the building on any side which provides building access to the public or where public parking is available, to provide safe and comfortable pedestrian access to the building. COMMENT: Walkways are provided on all frontages of buildings with public entrances. ii. On the sides of the building which provide public access into the building, the walkway should be wide enough to allow for sidewalk seating areas as well as pedestrian v travel. Weather protection of the walkway should be provided at a minimum at the entrance area and, if appropriate, along the entire walkway. COMMENT: Sidewalk seating can be provided as well as pedestrian access adjacent to entrances of the buildings. FEXHIBIT , -1 17 PAGE -OF 5 INS C. Walkway surfaces for walkways.crossing parking areas shall be designed to be visuall, dietinnulshable from driving surfaces through the use of durable, low maintenance surface materials such as pavers, bricks, or scored concrete to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort. COMMENT: ,uw Designated tDesignated ,u„ oer+aratimnl frnm nnrkinn areas and visually distinguishable from driving surfaces. 2. Other Site Development Standards q. All lighting fixtureu shall incorporate cut-off shields to prevent the spillover of light to adjoining properties. COMMENT: Cut-off shields can be designed for any lighting fixture and can easily be review at the building permit stage. b. Mechanical equipment, if located on the building, shall be located within the roof form of the building or enclosed within a screening structure, the design of which is consistent with the design of the building. COMMENT: Mechanical equipment is adequately screened at the rear of the building. C. Mechanical equipment, not located an the building, shall be screened from views from the public street, sidewalk, and properties outside the district with a durable, solid wall or fence, or an evergreen hedge or a combination of the above. COMMENT: Adequate screening occurs. d. All refuse and recycling containers within the district shall be contained within structures enclosed on all four sides and which are at least as high as the tallest container within the structure. COMMENT: All refuse recycling containers are screened as shown on the architectural elevations. MEMO EXHIBIT 18 PAGE OF J e. Bicycle racks shall be provided on site. Facilities for a minimum of ten bicycles shall be provided for developments having 100 or fewer pa: k?ng stalls, notwithstanding Code Section 18.106.020.P. For each 10 additional stalls, itic'MIt:es for five additional bicycles shall be provided. Bicycle parking areas shall not be iocatcd within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. It is strongly encouraged that bicycle parking areas be covered. COMMENT: Adequate room is available to provide a multiple of bicycle racks at the discretion of the Planning Department with final review of the plans prior to building permits. f. The site development plan shall incorporate a special features at the corner of the site. A special corner feature can be a landscape feature, sea3onal color planting area, sculpture or wszer feature. The feature shall provide a visual landmark and some amount of seating area. COMMENT: A design feature has been provided the perimeter of the site. g. Parking areas shall be designed to minimize conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular movements. Parking area landscaping shall be used to define and separate parking, access, and pedestrian areas within parking lots. COMMENT: The parking area minimizes conflicts between pedestrian and vehicle movements. A flow-through driving area is located in front of the grocery store without parking. This provides maximum visibility in front of the store for adequate vehicle turning movements and pedestrian access. Pedestrians only cross this 30 foot access drive once before entering the interior parking lot. Vehicles drive at a very slow speeds within a parking lot, and no conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles will occur compared to any other shopping center in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Additionally, adequate landscaped areas are provided to break up the size and scale of the parking lots. h. The landscape design for the site shall include plantings which emphasize the major points of pedestrian and vehicular access to and within the site. COMMENT: The landscape plan significantly accents pedestrian and vehicle access and provides safe opportunities to enter and exit the site without conflict between vehicle and pedestrian access. I. Site features such as fences, walls, refuse, and recycling facility enclosures, and light fixtures shall be designed to be consistent with the scale and architectural design of the primary structure(s). Such site features shall be designed and located to contribute to the pedestrian environment of the site developmetit. COMMENT: 19 EXHIBIT PAGE -OF , ig~ The site features have been designed to be compatible with the overall design concept of the project. Specific issues on final landscaping and fences and light fixtures can be reviewed prior to issuance of buiiding permits and adequately designed to accommodate pedestrian access. J. In multiple building complexes, buildings shall be located to facilitate safe and comfortable pedestrian movement between buildings. On sites whictr are adjacent iio uiherr properties with ir: the community commercial district, building location shall be chosen to facilitate pedestrian and vehicular connections to buildings an (nose adjacent properties. Consideration should be given to locating buildings closer to the public street with entrances to the buildings from the public sidewalk, with no intervening parking or driving area. Corner locations are particularly appropriate for this treatment. COMMENT: Safe and comfortable pedestrian access is provided throughout the site. Although significant separation exists between two 4,000 square foot pads at the Northview Drive, Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street intersections, easy access is available between Blockbuster Video and the Albertson's store. The pad users are destination facilities and do not need direct access to the Albertson's store; however, adequate pedestrian access is available. Locating these uses at apposite ends of the center provide the most efficient use of parking lots. If all of the uses were concentrated together, then increased competition for parking spaces would occur with increased impact and inconvenience to the customers. k. Opportunities shall be found for safe, convenient, and pleasant pedestrian connections to existing or proposed transit facilities. Where needed, shelters and layover areas for transit vehicles shall be incorporated into the site development. COMMENT: Adequate pedestrian access is available, especially when transit becomes available to serve this area. 3. Sign Design Standards a. All signage shall be an integral part of the architectural design. COMMENT: All signs are an integral part of the architectural design. Again, specific sign plans can be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of final permits. LDC.15042018 J v 20 EXHIBIT PAGE _______OF 1,1N 11111 !!I wa , yr'"l O' i • : -er. ' ter-' ~i; "ax. 14 ' i i • ~a nns ~ It ~ { ® - 1 Oslo t ► e _ i low v / l~669 yLiNn No®raro• ;aer~ aft ► l I Yli~/r' Z lye ~c~1JN/7 Lr- y~is 1NNeVl~► g1p~ ox 9!•I I Ht U U ` I ry Z,' r C1.1 19 44 1 1 ~ 4`"`~~rP I ~ ! Ool I ( t - logs SUPERMARKET SHOPPING CENTER SITES(Chart 1) Site Name of Supermarket Gross Square Acreage of No. and location Feet of Super- Shopping Market Floor Center Area 1 Safeway, Hillsboro 351,600 3.60 2 Hillsboro IGA 7,000 0.80 3 Hanks Thriftway, Hillsboro 15,000 1.33 4 Albertsons, Hillsboro 27,000 3.32 5 Wilson's IGA, Hillsboro 27,000(closed) 3.32 6 Waremart, Hillsboro 46;700 8.89 7 West Union AG 8,500 5.00 8 Tanasborns Safeway 34,200 21.0/1 9 Baseline Thriftway, Aloha 24,000 5.15 10 Safeway, Aloha 28,700 6.34 # 11 Albertsons, Aloha 42,000 6.60 12 Farmington Thriftway 27,000 26.79 13 Safeway, Cedar Mill 23,300 13.16 14 Ideal Sentry, Cedar Mill 10,000 1.07 15 Bales Thriftway, Cedar Mill 26,500 4.92 16 Earnie's Thrift way, Beaverton 16,800(closed) 1.99 17 Albertsons, Beaverton 29,000 19.57 18 Food Warehouse, Beaverton 28,400 36.59 19 Safeway, Beaverton 38,000 3.09 20 Prairie Market, Beaverton 18,000 2.04 # 21 Fred Meyer, Beaverton 50,500 38.11 22 West Slope Thriftway 11,800 3.36 23 Fred Meyer, Raliegh Hills 40,800 19.36 24 Waremart, Beaverton 40,600 8.08 25 Naps IGA, Beaverton 26,000 3.14 # 26 Keil's, Beaverton 45,000 10.77 # 27 Albertsons, Beaverton 42,000 4.01 28 Grocery Sac IGA, Beaverton 16,800 5.96 (chart continued on next page) Recently Built E3tHE _ ®F i as o gxfi I 10MMW f 1_., " SUPERMARKET SHOPPING CENTER SITES{Chart 1 ) (continued) Site Name of Supermarket Gross Square Acreage of Alft No. and location Feet of Super- Shopping Market Floor Center Area 29 Scholls Ferry Thriftway, Tigard 40,000 11.42 30 Fred Meyer, Tigard 29,300 12.65 31 Safeway, Tigard 32,800 8.26 32 Albertsons, Tigard 29,000 5.89 33 Food Warehouse, Tigard 17,000 (closed) 1.56 34 Prairie Market, Tigard 22,000 1.80 35 Tigard Thriftway 25,000 6.84 36 Kienowts Food Store, King City 20,700 15.07 37 Fred Meyer, Tualatin 35,000 15-58 38 Thriftway, Tualatin 33,300 12.82 39 Thriftway, Sherwood 22,000 11.02 55 Safeway, Cedar Hills 27,000 12.00 # 56 Fred Meyer, Cornelius 48,200 ?;/A 57 Hank's Thriftway, Cornelius 41,500 /A x 58 Safeway, Forest Grove 39,000 A 59 Sentry, Forest Grove 13,500 A 60 Prairie, Forest Grove 1 8, 900 (closed) 11- A Totals 1,201,100 382.71 # Recently Built Note; Closed stores have been excluded (74,700 sq. ft.) 1,201,100 Sq. ft. a 228,215 people = 5.3 square feet per person. EXHIOff PAGE -OF Traffic Impact Study Supplemental information Tqjc1rd~~- ~.r tfiroe;g W.,, YEN Ak I b e s {(R t L ry b "~~4E^~ mole KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ME Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering N December 1993 ® KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. . TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 S.W. ALDER, SUITE 700 • FORTLA":., LP. Q7205 • (503) 228-5230 • FAX (503) 273.8169 January10, 1994 Project Number: 1050.00 Douglas Norval PE ! Traffic Analyst Washington County 155 North First Av #350 Hillsboro OR 97124 RE: Request for Supplemental Information Ransportation Impact Study - 7 Bard Albertson's Dear Doug: In response to your request for additional information, dated November 16, 1993 (copy attached), please find the following item-by-item response. All of the information that you have _ ( requested (to the extent that we could supply it) is contained in the attached volume of l supplemental information. port. ITEM #I: Provide engineer's stamp and signature on the Access Re A stamped and signed copy of the report is provided as a separate volume in the same package. i IT-E'M #2: Provide off site traffic circulation map. i I In our most recent discussion, you'noted that this request was to determine if connections were proposed between this development and other adjacent developments and to determine if by approving this development other parcels would experience future access constraints. i As a result of this development, due to the constraints of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan (as it relates to the Community Commercial zoning), the approximately 12 acres of land cannot be total developed as the proposed Albertson's and related retail uses. The Community Commercial zoning is limited to a maximum site size of 8 acres. The approximately 4 acres remaining after this development will be designated for multi-family development. Severe grade restraints preclude access for this potential future multi-family development via the access system for the Tigard Albertson's, however, the arrangement of the parcel provides approximately 150 feet of frontage on Northview Drive (a local street) for provision of access to this parcel. The remaining parcel would not have enough frontage on Scholls Ferry Road to provide an access that would conform to the applicable access spacing requirement for that facility. It should be noted that no specific development is proposed for the multi-family parcel at this time. EXHIBIT AGE ___~OF i P BELLEVUE • POR'T'LAND • SACRAMENTO 17q EMIR! Doug Norval January 10, 1994 Page 2 ITE1lg #3: Influence Area Map. Please find attached the requested influence area map (Figure 1). The influence area for this development on Scholls Ferry Road (a Major Collector) extends 820 feet southwest from the southwest curb face of Walnut and 100 feet from the southwest curb face of Walnut to the northeast. Along Walnut (a Minor Collector), the influence area extends for 100 feet southeast from the north curb face of Northview Drive. Along Northview Drive (a local street), the influence area extends for 50 feet from the property line (which is 580 feet from Walnut). Id'r.M #4 Provide A.M. Peak hour existing traffic conditions. For almost all areas of Washington County, average weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are higher than those for the a.m. peak hour. Washington County's and METRO's forecasting models are p.m. peak hour models because that time period is the most critical period for the transportation system in terms of demand. The critical nature of the p.m. peak hour is emphasized for retail uses which generally do not generate as much traffic during the a.m. peak hour as during the p.m. peak hour. Only the Saturday midday peak hour, for some retail uses, may be as critical as the weekday p.m. peak hour. For that reason, we examined only the p.m. peak hour and the Saturday midday peak hour in our existing conditions analysis. You have provided to us a 24 hour traffic count indicating that the a.m. peak hour for Scholls Ferry Road at its intersection with Old Scholls Ferry Road is approximately 15 % higher than the p.m. peak hour. To determine if the difference. in shopping center trip generation between. a.m. peak hour and the p.m. peak hour was sufficient to overcome the 15%a difference in the background traffic volumes, Table 1 was prepared. Table 1 compares the combination of net new trip generation for the site with the background volumes at the Scholls Ferry/Walnut intersection (p.m. and Saturday volumes that we counted .and simulated a.m. volumes). X"I PACE ....OF S ME= 11 jj1 11, litiopi NORTH d (NOT TO SCALE) INFLUENCE AREA o2U, 1 nn' SHABAD ALENBET 4' PAVED DAY SCH~l 13' LANES SHOULDER 12' LANES _ - I - = HOLLS FERRY ROAD S w S c " NO ACCESS POIWTS = = = ~ -i SIDEWALK ;PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED,PROP ED j FULL ACCESS FULL ACCESS! RT-IN//RT-OUT (40' WIDE) (40' WIDE)' (40' WIDE) { 400' 120' 160' E o j 720' ' i Lo E ~ PROPOSED > FULL ACCESS SITE (40' WIDE) ---,1 Z ~ A ~NF~uEtJC~ ~ 5ae, CURB CUT SIDEWALK c LLJ 320 51 R~NJ~E`14 pcCESS _o_} _o 1Ni_l ~ =W S~ -V 7 v- =G cF-.~{ 7 p T EXHIBIT PAGE OF r~ i INFLUENCE AREA MAP _ TIGARD ALBERTSONS FIGURE SUPPLEMENTAL '.INFORMATION ®Q DECEMBER 1993 ~osoes a Doug Norval January 10, 1994 Page 4 Table 1 Comparison of Background and Sine T rill ane~ at.Vn P.M. Peak Hour Trip Component Background Site Total Volumes Generation Traffic Background Volumes at Scholls/Walnut (A) 605 Net New Site-Generated Traffic (B) 395 Total of (A) + (B) 1,000 9 { A.Pra Peak Hour Trip Component Background Site Total Volumes Generation Traffic ESYTMATE3 Background Volumes at Scholls/Walnut (A) 695 Net New Site-Generated Traffic (B) 170 Total of (A) + (B) - 865 Saturday Midday Hour Trip Component Background Site Total Volumes Generation Traffic Background Volumes at Scholls/Walnut (A) 455 Net New Site-Generated Traffic (B) 435 Total of (A) + (B) 890 By comparing the figures in Table 1, one can clearly note that the p.m. peak hour is the most critical tin io period. Our report examined p.m. peak hour level of service with and without the proposed Tigard Albertson's development. EXHIBIT ._.tv m.~ i PAGE OF 171, r Doug Norval I - January 10, 1994 Page 5 ITEM #5 Provide trip generation table for a. m. peak hour and Saturday midday conditions (to supplement the p.m. peak hour table provided in the report). Please find following a trip generation table for a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour (taken directly from the report) and Saturday midday conditions. The table is based on the proposed 53,600 square-foot shopping center and a 4,000 square-foot high turnover sit-down restaurant. I Table 2 Trip Generation A. t. Peak Hour Land Use Total Trips Inbound Outbound Trips Trips Shopping Center 110 70 40 High-Turnover Site-Down Restaurant 65 30 35 r SUBTOTAL 175 100 75 I HIM Less 5 % Pass-by Deduction (Restaurant) (5) (0) (5) NET.NMY'' TRira 170 A 70 1 P.M. Peak Flour (from Table 3 of Report) Land Use Total Trips Inbound Outbound Trips Trips l Shopping Center 440 215 225 High-Turnover Site-Down Restaurant 125 70 55 SUBTOTAL 565 285 280 Less 35% Pass-by Reduction (200) (100) (100) NET NEW TRIPS 385 185 18a 1 I PAGE -OF i Doug Norval 71 January 10, 1994 Page 8 allocation of green time between critical movements. The allocation optimizes by ensuring that the volume/capacity ratios are equal for each critical movement. For planning purposes this is . t.ta. t, t victe, one ♦1..+t. may need w t~, { b.o ref:wu.. rl r# d,,.-n }nng n the dP-1C-anrp% " of tha -1 M" au accepe i T'1l,? ava approach - .o--- refined analysis may not provide such an optimal signal timing but should not result in a significant change in the level of service. The warrant analysis provided in Section 7 of the supplemental volume includes the queuing analysis, the left-turn storage analysis and a phasing-warrant analysis (as discussed with you on December 1,- 1993). In our report, the assumed 2010 phasing for the Scholls Ferry/Walnut signal was protected left turns on all four approaches; the warrant analysis indicates that a less restrictive phasing plan with protected left turn phasing on the east-west approaches only is warranted. Of course, since we are examining 2010 p.m. peak hour conditions using planning- level projections, these warrants would be confirmed during the design report for any proposed signalization of this intersection. s V' I bust that this extensive documentation should satisfy all your technical questions regarding our analysis of the Tigard Albertson's. Please call me directly if you have any further questions i after your review of this supplemental information package. Sincerely, Evan Dust Transportation Planter cc: Norm Schoen, MPR John Shonkwiler j . Randy Wooley, City of Tigard Attachments Copy of Washington County request for information Supplemental information volume, Tigard Albertson's i HAPR0NUM1050\ 11 MM.LTR EXHIBM PAGE ~OF 5 :111 A 11; 1 N! F CHECKLIST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF ACCESS REPORTS WASHINGTON REQUIRED UNDER RGO 86-95 COUNTY, Title of Report it4laiy/ ,C)Li,•, 1~ OREGON Author: jeh Date: ACCEPT? YES HO ITEM BACKGROUND INFORMATION ❑ iJ P.E.:t=:p eH Signature ❑ Vicinity Map I] Site Plan ❑ K Off-Site Circulation Plan (as applicable) t'7. Cr Influence Area Map (Minimum Influence Area: Frontage plus distance I'd") - road names, funs. class, pavement and shoulder width, striping and channelization, and all existing driveways } r within influence area ❑ W Existing Traffic - measured within previous 12 months - show turning movements at access points and intersections within influence area / TRIP GENERATION C3 ❑ / Description of development, intended use ❑ ED' Based on most recent edition of ITE Trip Generation or approved other rates; include both AM and PM peak hour (other time periods where applicable); provide complete documentation of calculations TRIP DISTRIBUTION ❑ Based on METROS zoned figures, supplied by staff, or analysis of local traffic patterns based on collected data Q" ❑ Include flow diagrams TRIP ASSIGNMENT Gi/ ❑ Based on METRO'S zoned figures, supplied by staff, or analysis of Local traffic patterns based on collected data Q ❑ Assignment onto major collector/arterial system ❑ Or Flow Diagrams - Existing Traffic; Added Traffic; Site Traffic; Total Traffic WARRANTS/SAFETY ANALYSIS ❑ Identify deficiencies d ❑ / Verify compliance to Access Spacing Standard or justify any variance needed ❑ GI• Address potential safety problems resulting from conflicting turn movements with other driveways and internal traffic circulation Q/1 ❑ Determine need for signals at frontage road access points, using MUTCD warrants Determine need for storage lanes for right or left turns ❑ Address availability of adequate sight distance at frontage road access points, for both / existing and ultimate road configuration I3 ❑ Evaluate need for acceleration lanes, decal Lanes, turn lanes, and.channelization when determined necessary by accepted standards and practices IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ Identify alternate methods of mitigating identified deficiencies Q/ If a signal is warranted, recommend type of signal control and phasing G~ ❑ If turn lanes required, recommend amount of storage OTHER 3}~` ❑ Technical Appendix - sufficient material to convey complete understanding to staff of technical adequacy C014MNTS •71:Z i'• tit'J9i l/7t •A Y Reviewed By:~l5 Date of Review: NOTE: This checklist displays the minimum information required for an Access Report to be accepted as complete. Acceptance does not certify adequacy and is in no way an approval. Additional information may be required after acceptance of the Access Report. EXHID1T Rev. 11/15/93 PAN I MI Traffic Impact Study Supyrer r rer rtar rr rior r s ear.rUr r , rigard r Albertsons Prepared for: 1Musil Perkowitz Ruth, Inc. 9150 SW Pioneer Ct., Suite T Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503) 685-7350 Prepared by: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 S.W. Alder, Suite 700 ® Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 228-5230 December 1993 Project No.: 1050.00 EXHIBIT K ` r PAGE . OF KIM t ME LM Em 1 m ra Section 7 6n-Process Traffic KIN<, Ask r K-10 EXHIBIT PAGE _._-OF December 1993 Tiagrd Albertson--Suov/emental lrvf^!7n_-V= In-Process Traffic This section provides, in re$nnr,cP to _..,....r #6", uaffile assignment maps for the p.m. peak hour for the in-process developments identified in Figure 8 of the traffic impact report. It should be noted that the assigments are restricted to the subject intersections within the study area of the report. As well, these assignments are reported to the nearest trip while the volume summary in the repor are reported to the nearest 5 trips. EXHIBIT PAGE 10ttelson & Associates, Inc. d f ® ® SUBJECT BY DATE ~,D a n r, < n C V ! PM1 ~cn/"" SHEET NO. OF _ C P PI--r t 1-+ 2 r aL;2r:._.~ n A/ PROJECT NO. 1- ~ I Q • 4 1 ~ 180 y a T .ss - - - 10 y,/OOLS. Yfi 1 v I- ~c 2.0 _ _•x„~ c 10 z, 20 V too ,0 0 JIM - _ I 4 N.E. -_.l..C~_i ~ _~C u~1_c.'T _ Du-e.l N G _ - J w b L_v4 L'1 _ EXHIBIT PAGE -OF a~ .a~0 U m 10 (NOT TOR SCALE) L 2 6 O p20D^~ *4 ° z ap• vi SC~p~~S y a ~o M vi ~t ~3o OG,,~`! yG~ MORNING }t1U DR. F ON 815E OR. o X60 ; ski K u 'At, : ' a~• '4~V~ ~ 35 co, rsr 1 1' P yo h~o WALNUT h~ dh ~jo 1. d PI-4 PEAe, MDV2 TIGARD ALBERTSONS FIGURE / E SUPPLEMER;ITAL INFORMATION l\~ 154l1~IS DECEMBER 1993 l Q "PAGIR 10502F02 v MEMEN i A N_m Isom Section 2 Existing Traffic Counts 7 ir MEE EXHIBIT ~ - ~ PAGE -®F INv=SECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMKARY REPORT SCHOLI.S FERRY ROAD AT SW 135"1 AVENUE IN, 130 T= 0% P=.75 a DATE OF COUNT: 06/02/93 I0 133 DAY OF WEEK: Wed R _ 16 8 6 TIME STARTED: 16.00 T TINT ENDED: IS: 00 ~H -4-1696 Ll- 4-1719 - j i 14 12 780 -P f-1462 P=.895 P=.918 173 , r245 TEV=TOTAL EA`-`R Y VOLT-INS If ♦ ♦ T=.TRUCKS BY APPROACH ~l I rr a P=PHF BY APPROAai 967 218 7 148 4 Peak Hour 1426 17:00-18:00 TYaic Smithy • T= 1.8% $=...871 373 TEV=3089 lf L y Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND - PERITOOD' B P J .41 I LO. .01 r' v L x'20i✓i ~ ALL 16:00-16:05 12 69 0 3 1 0 13 0 9 14 101 1 223 16:05-16:10 7 61 1 0 0 0 19 0 8 14 76 2 188 16:10-16:15 17 68 2 2 0 0 9 0 8 17 104 0 227 16:15-16:20 14 70 0 2 1 0 7 0 9 11 75 3 192 16:20-16:25 9 71 1 1 1 1 15 0 13 28 98 1 239 16:25-16:30 11 80 1 0 0 0 17 2 7 22 103 1 244 16:30-16:35 12 61 0 2 0 0 16 0 6 11 79 0 187 16:35-16:40 17 66 2 1 0 0 15 0 10 21 96 1 229 16:40-16:45 12 61 0 1 0 0 17 1 14 7 88 0 201 16:45-16:50 10 52 0 0 i 0 16 0 7 23 96 0 205 16:50-16:55 8 66 0 0 0 0 8 0 10 16 104 1 213 16:55-17:00 13 36 1 i 1 1 13 0 9 12 82 4 173 17:00-17:05 13 65 0 2 0 0 16 0 13 24 125 1 259 17:05-17:10 i6 52 0 0 2 1 14 0 8 17 2-25 1 236 17:10-17:15 13 70 2 1 2 0 19 1 14 16 125 1 264 17:15-17:20 13 65 1 = 1 0 15 2 15 19 14i 1 276 17:20-17:25 8 53 0 1 0 0 18 0 17 21 130 0 248 17:25-17:30 15 52 0 2 1 1 17 0 9 20 35 1 253 17:30-17:35 22 63 2 1 0 0 21 1 12 15 112 0 249 17:35-17:40 24 6= 0 0 0 0 18 0 11 25 102 0 243 17:40-1.7:45 13 7t 2 2 0 0 16 0 9 i8 i41 4 284 17:45-17:50 2.4 71 4 1 1 3 27 0 17 22: 99 0 258 17:50-17:55 i0 75 2 1 0 1 20 2 i0 24 127 1 273 17:55-18:00 12 72 1 2 1 0 17 1 i3 25 100 2 246 Total Survey 315 1541 22 29 13 8 363 10 258 441 2564 26 5610 PFUl- 71 8`7 .44 .67 .4 .38 85 .58 .8 88 .9 .6 .947 Tracks 2.2 3.3 0 0 0 0 2.3 0 1.2 1.1 2.4 0 2.4 S,cTanea Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Peas 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 Hourly Totals 16:0071'7:00 142 761 8 i3 5 2 165 3 110 196 1102 14 2521 16:15-17:15 148 750 7 8 3 173 4 120 208 1196 14 2642 16:30-17:30 150 699 6 14 8 3 184 4 132 207.1326 11 2744• 16:45-17:45 168 716 8 13 8 3 291 4 134 226 1418 14 2903 17:00-18:00 173 780 14 16 8 6 218 7 148 245 1462 12 3089 EXHIBIT Pl.-OF i ...v.s~.rtz.r,7T irw'~r~TAIT C'T1MM2~R'1' RFPC)i2'T L SCROLLS FERRY ROAD AT OLD SCHOL 4 FERRY ROAD s T= 0k P-0. N ~0 a DATE OF COUNT: 05/27/,x'93 0 10 DAY OF WEEK: Thu R 0 0 0 TIME STAR M): 16:00 T TIME ENDED: 18:00 H *-1394 I e-1659 a r A 0 ~v T= 2.7o T= 1.So 774 (-1380 P=.947 P=.936 14 a a 279 ~TRU BY ADP OACH P=PHF BY APPROACH 788 1058-► 14 0 284 Peak Hour 1293 17:00-18:00 (Traffic Smithy v T= 6.6% P=.752 1298 TEV=2745 i c Su_-vey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD. A' a a FROM - TO i .i 1 L. --I I r L ALL 16:00-16:05 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 11 91 0 185 16:05-16:10 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 27 81 0 186 16:10-16:15 1 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 15 74 0 161 16:15-16:20 2 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 23 92 0 197 16:20-16:25 1 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 23 84 0 3.87 16:25-16:30 0 60 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 13 83 0 176 16:30-16:'35 0 50 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 23 80 0 162 16:35-16:40 .1 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 24 87 0 194 16:40-16:45 0 54 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 30 85 0 189 16:45-16:50 2 48 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 17 90 0 174 16:50-16:55 i 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 19 92 0 195 16:55-17:00 1 49 0 0 0 0 2 0 34 27 83 1 197 17:00-17:05 0 88 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 14 117 0 239 -7:05-17:10 0 57 0 0 0 0 2 0 18 29 113 0 219 17:10-17:15 1 62 0 0 0 0 0 18 22 108 0 212 17:15-17:20 2 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 26 128 0 237 17:20-17:25 2 60 0 0 0 0 2 0 19 30 105 0 218 17:25-17:30 1 66 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 28 116 0 246 17:30-17:35 2 52 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 28 100 0 211 17:35-17:40 2 68 0 0 0 0 0 31 3.3 104 0 219 17:40-17:45 0 67 0 0 0 0 1 0 =7 12 131 0 248 17:45-17:50 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 127 0 250 17:50-17:55 2 64 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 21 124 0 230 17:55-18:00 2 57 0 0 0 0 3 0 19 28 107 0 216 Total Survey 23 1472 0 0 0 0 20 0 499 531 2402 1 4948 .7 .93 0 0 0 0 .88 0 74 81 .9 0 .942 Trucks 34.8 2.2 0 0 0 0 35 0 5.4 3.6 1.4 0 2.5 Sto*or)ed Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Per s- 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 9 698 0 0 0 0 6 0 215 252 1022 1 2203 16:15-17:15 9 726 0 0 0 0 10 0 217 264 1114 1 2341 16:30-17:30 11 722 0 0 0 0 12 0 243 289 1204 1 2482 16:45-17:45 14 739 0 0 0 0 i3 0 296 265 1287 1 2615 17:00-18:00 14 774 0 0 0 0 14 0 284 2799 7.380 0 2745 EXHIBIT r ~ - l1q. 'ERSECTION TURN MOVEN1ENT CO'.7I,'T SUMMARY REPORT L cr_unT.T q FERRY ROAD AT SW 135TH AM M A T= 0% P=.562 DATE OF COMM 05/27/93 I N 18 I18 DAY OF WEEK: Thu T 6 1 11 TIME STARTED: 16:00 TIME ENDED: 18:00 H 4--1378 j3 d *-1393 ~ T= 2.6% 12 L2 T= 1.20 713 4-1181 P=.855 P=.675 210 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLLWI 175 A ® T=%TRUCI{S BY APPROACH 1 r° P=PHF BY APPROACH. 900 , 91 4 137 861 Peak Hour a 16:55-17:55 Traffic Smithy 1386~ T- 2.6% P=..864 1332 TEV=2643 [Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUPTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD. A a- L rROMI - To e ALL 16:00-16:05 7 53 0 1 0 0 16 0 9 14 67 0 1067 16:05-16:10 12 53 0 0 0 0 12 0 11 19 57 0 164 16:10-16:15 9 58 0 1 0 0 9 0 12 11 63 0 163 16:15-16:20 9 62 2 1 0 0 i7 0 i5 17 55 0 178 16:20-16:25 12 66 0 0 1 0 11 0 8 12 89 0 199 16:25-16:30 8 57 2 0 0 0 13 0 10 9 82 0 181 16:30-16:35 11 49 0 2 0 0 6 0 9 8 74 0 159 16:35-16.40 4 67 1 0 0 2 15 0 13 11 95 0 208 16:40-16:45 17 48 1 0 0 0 13 2 10 8 80 0 179 16:45-16:50 11 48 1 0 1 0 12 1 10 7 90 0 181 16:50-16:55 i8 63 0 0 0 0 19 0 11 8 88 0 207 16:55-17:00 13 55 4 1 0 2 i8 0 16 13 76 0 198 17:00-17:05 26 51 0 0 0 1 20 0 18 24 70 0 210 17:05-17.10 6 62 i i 0 0 15 0 9 20 106 0 220 17:10-17:15 12 60 0 0 0 i2 0 6 14 1-20 220' 17:15-17:20 15 54 0 - 1 0 18 3 8 18 119 0 237 17:20-17:25 9 53 0 0 0 0 15 0 11 16 80 0 184 17:25-17:30 15 61 0 0 0 3 12 0 9 10 112 0 222 17:30-17:35 19 56 0 1 0 1 16 0 11 1S 96 0 218 17:35-17:40 7 55 3 1 0 2 20 1 14 16 67 167 17:40-17:45 23 80 2 0 0 2 it 0 12 23 97 0 250 17:45-17:50 16 58 0 0 0 0 20 0 12 23 109 0 238 17:50-17:55 4 68 2 0 0 0 14 0 11 is i29 0 253 17:55-18:00 13 52 0 0 0 3 i4 0 6 21 73 2 184 Total Survey 306 1389 19 11 3 16 348 7 261 355 2114 4 4833 =-F .83 87 .6 .5 .25 .46 .9 .33 .8 .85 86 :5 .891 0 0 0 0 2.6 0 2.7 ..6 1.3 0 1.9 % Trucks 1.6 2.9 SStooned Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 ens 0 Hourly Totals 16.00-17:00 131 679 11 6 2 4 161 3 134 137 936 0 2204 16:15-17:15 147 688 i2 6 2 5 171 3 135 i51 1025 1 2346 16:30-17:30 157 671 8 6 2 8 175 6 130 157 1110 1 2431 16:45-17:45 174 698 11 6 2 11 188 5 i35 187 1121 2 2540 17:00-16:00 175 710 8 5 1 12 167 4 127 218 1178 4 2629 EXHIBIT I<' 17 PAQ mm ml- I m: ~40~ r Ih"Ir 2SE:_°~'ION TURN MOVEMENT COT.J 7 SUMMARY REPORT SCROLLS FERRY ROAD AT WALN= STREET (MURRAY BOULEVARD) T_~ ng P=0_ _ _ ' NEW Ip ~0 I0 DAY OFWEEIC: Thus/27%93 T 0 0 0 TIME STARTED: 16:00 H 4-266 41 4 @--273 TIME ENDED: 18:00 ~ T= 6.2o 0 LO T= 4.10 278 4-263 - r=.798 D=.793 3 n 10 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME v ♦ T=.TRUCKS BY APPROACH P=PHF BY APPROACH 281 . 'h 294 113 3 0 y6 ♦ Peak r 6:45-17:45 Traffic Smithy T= 5.-i'P=.527 119 TEV=573 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD J A, FROM - TO r .41 r L ALL 16:00-16:05 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 25 16:05-16:10 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 22 0 37 16:10-16:15 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 34 16:15-16:20 1 17 0 0 0 0 2' 0 4 1 17 0 42 16:20-16:25 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 26 0 38 16:25-16:30 0 i3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 15 0 30 16:30-16:35 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 30 16:35-16:40 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 46 16:40-16:45 1 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 19 0 41 16:45-16:50 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 46 16:50-16:55 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 47 16:55-17:00 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 51 17:00-17:05 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 13 0 39 17:05-17:10 0 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 19 0 41 17:10-17:15 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 45 17:15-17:20 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 26 0 46 17:20-17:25 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 51 17:25-17:30 0 29 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 25 0 56 17:30-17:35 1 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 19 0 45 17:35-17:40 0 26 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 23 0 54 17:40-17:45 2 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 52 17:45-17:50 0 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 23 0 43 17:50-17:55 0 19 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 2 22 0 44 17:55-18:00 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 1 17 0 37 Total Survey 5 466 0 0 0 0 7 0 29 18 495 0 1020 P'=' .25 .82 0 0 0 0 .38 0 57 .5 79 0 .924 11 Truexs 20 - 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.9 0 4.2 0 5.1 Stoaued Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peas- 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 2 201 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 9 240 0 467 16:15-17:15 2 210 0 0 0 0 4 0 17 9 254 0 496 16:30-17:30 1 241 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 9 274 0 539 16:45-17:45 3 278 0 0 0 0 3 0 16 10 263 0 573 17:00-18:00 3 265 0 0 0 0 4 0 17 9 255 0 553 ~.BCOII~IT ~ P ~ U PAGE ,AF Q i S ' INTERSECTION T'JRN MOV'rMCT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT SW 135TH AVE M AT SW WAI= STREET ♦ T- 2.1%- P=.910 ♦ DATE OF COJNT: 07/06/93 ~O o 1286 DkY OF -vFr2K: Thu R 2 11 129 TIME STARTED: 16:00 ~J T TIME ENDED: 18:00 H m-3 r~ I r-294 1 J v X277 0 T= 0 o T= .4 0 ~-1 P=.5 P=.844 1 s~ 016 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOIADE r a r T= oTRUCKS BY APPROA(14 P=P.?p BY APPROA- Mi 2 139'-' 0 8 30 Peak Hour a 17:00-18:00 Traffic Smithy 28 T= 7.4o P=.409 118 TEV=456 IiTraffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SO=H BOUND NOR7A BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD a a _ MOM - TO o ° ALL 16:00-16:05 0 0 0 0 3 4 1 5 1 1 0 7 22 16:05-16:10 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 4 1 0 0 11 25 16:10-16:15 0 0 0 0 2 16 0 1 2 7 0 12 34 16:15-16:20 0 0 0 1 0 71 0 1 0 2 0 73 28 16:20-16:25 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 3 2 1 0 "3 31 16:25-16:30 0 0 0 0 2 12 0 2 2 1 0 75 34 16:30-16:35 0 0. 0 0 1 5 0 1 2 2 0 73 24 16:35-16:40 0 0, 0 0 2 9 0 1 0 0 0 11 23 16:40-16:45 0 0 0 0 2 13 0 2 1 2 1 15 36 16:45-16:50 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 26 16:50-16:55 0 0 0 0 1 13 0 0 1 2 0 20 37 16:55-17:00 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 2 7 0 9 22 17:00-17:05 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 4 0 21 37 17:05-17:10 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 .9 35 17:10-17:15 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 78 31 17:15-17:20 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 24 =6 17:20-17:25 0 0 0 2 1 70 0 4 4 - 28 17:25-17:30 0 0 0 0 7 72 0 0 1 0 0 25 39 17:30-17:35 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 2 0 30 45 77:35-17:40 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 29 38 17:40-17:45 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 1 2 0 24 39 17:45-17:50 0 0 0 0 0 "3 0 1 0 2 0 24 40 17:50-17:55 0 0 0 0 3 10 0 0 2 2 0 32 17:55-18:00 0 0 1 0 0 71 0 0 0 7 0 20 33 Total Survey 1 0 1 6 28 247 1 29 24 29 2 430 798 P: .25 0 .25 25 46 .85 0 .5 36 .67 .25 .82 .844 Trucks 0 0 0 16.7 10.7 .8 0 10.3 4.2 0 0 .5 1.5 StoPPed Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 peas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 0 0 0 4 17 118 1 21 14 73 1 1=3 342 16:15-17:15 0 0 0 3 14 127 0 12 10 76 1 781 364 16:30-17:30 0 0 0 2 10 7=1 0 10 11 74 2 277 397 16:45-17:45 1 0 0 2 9 129 0 8 11 74 1 261 436 17:00-18:00 1 0 1 2 11, 129 0 8 10 16 1 277 456 i MISR - PAGE 1 1 Oro _ E.OC)Y1T S'R - ~i0AI 07 v i- 1g~ECTso FIIiRX Al BA,a,~OF S19 °00`g3 0% P°0• TM ST -a~1g:00 ' 0 T3 Q t Q 0 a *-3.53 . OT Lutz- K •i--157 55 --T(5"rP V`- VOAr . r~aa 7 s 4 272 .a--1~ p= • 7 40 ~ U$ S •894 Smithy ice o 282 °'peaK ~Idv~2:55 (Traffic SrauNY '1 10 31.55° tTraffiC BQL3YaD 2 0 }12 TTE0~.447 ST I ~OIt'L'ii 272 8 T-- 3.8% p-• 75 t S •44 . . BAST 15 Q .21- . t 3 '12 • 34 T pTO - 0 0 0 0 .0 13 0.. 29 ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 31 ` 0 0 2 0 12. 27: 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 7 0: 35 19..:05 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 7 Q ':35 18:00°0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 15 29 9 43 31:05-~i:15 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 ?5 0. :::3.2 11g°11:20 p 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 0 29. 31:20°11:25 q 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 '•3~ .25°11:30 1 18 0 0 0 31• •35 0 14 0 0 0 0 yt:3Q- 0 0 0 1 0 .11 0 0 1 0 12 0` :29:: `.4:0 0 0 0 1 g 0 :38. 1x`:40-11:45 3 0 24 ZZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 jS 0 gg . 11 • ; 50 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 40 33.;45 ~-1 ,55 0 28 20 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 14 0 45. 13s5Q Oa 0 ° . t 11:55;,12;05 q 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 216 46. 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 ".:10 . . 12 12 00-12 10 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 -319 12:3-5 0 0 ; 3 12; 10°7.2:20 0 0 35 p 26 . 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ® 7. 0 •~1 2;20-2'25 0 0 0 0 2 37 32.:• 25-'32:30 0 17 q 0 q 0 q 0 1 5 0 t 3.2 z *-35 0 30-1? 123a-12~ ; 2 -12 45 0 0 33. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 12:5-12 X55 0 22 0 0 2 ` 1x - 5-a.3.0 .1.2;5 y3 288 0• ,$40. 76 0 0 0 0 ZO 0 0 0 0 0. 5 500 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 397 . Total SAY 0 7.895 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 136 0.. •352: gkTFPL.A Buses 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 55 141. 0 pads p 0 0 1 0 14 7 151 a :.,~t? , f lio~ly Tata7-s 3 339 0 Q 0 0 2 0 la 8 252 iQp- .2~05 3 261 0 0 0 0 2 0 11.30 30 258 0 11 455-.2.45 a 256 0 00°13.00 ° vD". YOQ- o~ • r_ass~ G 1.- .TUL--l M--9'S MON IM ::a& TRAFFIC SMITHY P..e=.. nrMRSEM.LON TURN MOVENE 'P COUNT SUbMRY REPORT SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD ' AT•. OLD SCHOi •T S FERRY ROAD M 10 DATE OF' GAUNT: 07/10/92 O t to DAY OF WEEK: Sat R 0 0 0 TIME STARTED: 11:00 H 4-796 L® x-919 TIME ENDED: 13.00 - - o 4o 11 T= 2.4% 1~ 3.VV 737 -a- x-778 • P=.855 P=.915 23 f141 TEV--O AL ENTRY MOLLM ~ T+$TRUCKS BY APPROACH P=PHF BY APPROACH 760 -1- 18 0 294 iQ31-►Peak Hour 1164 12:00-13:00 Traffic Smithy. b T= 7.2% P~.857 1312 . TEV=1991 Traffic Survey Service,; EAST BOUND SOUTH BOMM NORTH BOUND 11%MST BOUND ' TIME FROM PERIOD TO ALL 11:00-11:05 1 40 0 0 o 0 1 0 *29 14 42 0 •''12'7. . 11:05-11:10 1 74 0 0 0 0 1 0 21 11 46 0.''•1.5•4 11:10-11:1.5 1 47 0 0 0 0 2 0 24. 12 •.44 0•.: •:13®. 11:15-11:20 1 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 12 57 .0. ••163' ' 11:20-11:25 1 67 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 10 51 o...'49 11:25-11:30 2 63 D 0 0. 0 1 0 22 7 54 .0.::149: 11:30-11.:35 2 57 0 0 0 0 3 0 15 13 54 0. •144, 11:35-11:40 3 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 10 57 1. 1~0• 11:40-11:45 0 53 0 0 0 0 3 0 26 it .55 0 148. 11:4511:50 1 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 8 • 73 0: •173 11:50-11:55 2 55 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 11 •44 0." 28 ' 11:5512:00 2 57 0 0 0 0 1 0 24 7'. 45 p 36. ' 12:00-12:05 1 53 0 0 0 0 1 0 36 10 :68 :8. 1f69. 12:05-12:10 2 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 '16 7 :81 06.0 12:10-12:15 2 74 0 0 0 0 2 0 19 15 58 0; ZaO. . 12:15-12:20 2 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 9 46 0. 143•" 12:20-12:25 0 61 0 0 0 0 3 0 33 12 49 0 153. • 12:25-12:30 3 70 0 0 0 0 2 0 26 15 67 0. 183 . 12:30-12:35 5 46 0 0 0 0 2 0 25 19 59 0. 156. -12:35-3:2:40 2 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 11 •60 0 .•1.50 12:40-12:45 1 77 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 14 68 0 11.81 12:45-12:50 3 83 0 0 0 0 1 0 17 5 82 0 '•1.91 12:50-12:55 0 47 0 0 0 0 2 0 34 17 .-65 0. '165 12:55-13:00 2 56 D 0 0 0 4 0 21 7 75 0 :165 Total Survey 40 1460 0 0 0 0 33 0 551 267 1400 •1 3.752 PHF .58 .85 0 0 0 0 .64 0 .86 .77 :88 0 •..926 % Tracks 20 1.9 0 0 0 0 30.3 0 5.8 7.9 - 3 0 3•.$ Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0: Peds 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0• Hcurlp Totals 11:00-12:00 17 723 0 0 0 0 15 0 257 126 622 1..1.761; 11:15--12:15 19 743 0 0 0 0 14 0 254 1.21 697 1 ••'18.49 11:30-12:30 20 730 0 0 0 0 17 0 279 128 .697 • • 1.:.72 11:45-12:45 23 735 0 0 0 0 14 0 279 • 338 418 -0`1807 Amok. 12:00-13:001 23 737 0 0 0 0 18 0 294 141 778 --ot;9 , P/IGE : , ...,j. ®F R-f~69e I n 0?-12-93 03:25P?4 P602 #05 a Elm-- 1-- .JUL-s2-5r3 MON 1~ 24 TRAPPXC SMXTHY P. @S INTE1tSZ ZON TURN MOVEMC COUNT- SUfgdARY REPORT St"t OL S FERRY ROAD AT 135TH AVE-Wi ' N ~ 04; P"•590 26 DATE OF COUNT: 07/10/93 0 t21 DAY OF WEEK: Sat R 9 5 12 TIME STARTED: 11:00 H -4-922 *j L* 1--965 TIME ENDED: 13:00 - X 11 t6 927 -70o P-.903 P=.931 121 173: TEV=TOTAL ENTRY.VOLU~+IE T=TRUCKS BY'.APPROACH 1059-~ 101 1222--~ P=PHF BY APPROACH. 127 4 173 Peak Hour 299 12:00-13:00 TraffC 'Smithy ° ' T= 2.2$ P=.783 ;304 MV=2354 Traffic Survey, Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND Y7E51' BOUND TI ME PERIOD 4 FROM - TO 71 11:00-11:05 4 51 0 1 0 0 13 0 12 4 44-. 0 : 129', . 11:05-11:10 9 102 1 3 0 0 3 1 3 12 43• . 1 178 : 11:10-11:15 6 70 0 2 1 1 9 0 14 9 •50 '1.•' 163 . 11:15-11:20 3 73 0 4 0 1 3 0 17 13 48 D:• 162 . .11:20-11:25 17 69 1 0 0 0 11 0 18 9 53' 1 17,9. 11:25-11:30 8 86 0 2 1 0 10 0 16 10 0' 0 _10.3 11:30-11:35 8 61 1 0 0 2 16 0 15 8 0 0 '161. 11:35-11:40 12 79 1 0 0 0 9 0 9 9 67 1' 1:8.7• . 11:40-11:45 4 73 0 1 1 0 11 0 21 10 70 0 191'•• 11:45-11:50 9 88 3 1 0 0 8 1 24 13 49 0. 196- 12:50-11:55 7 50 01 0 0 1 10 0 12 13 16 1 ; 140. 11:55-12:00 11 86 0 0 0 1 11 1 22 23 9' 0•204 12:DO-12:05 7 72 1 0 0 0 7 1 1.2 18 82 1 201• 12:05-12:10 11 73 0 0 0 0 8 0 14 10 7.6 '0•-192 12:10-12:15 12 70 2 0 1 0 6 0 12 11 54 0'•168•'' 12:15-12:20 13 87 0 0 0 0 12 0 14 12 41 1 3:80, 12:20-12:25 5 88 3 2 1 1 12 1 16 16 67 0 212:•• 12:25-12:30 12 85 0 1 0 1 7 0 11 15 66 0 298 - 12:30-12:35 9 60 0 2 0 3 12 0 17 11 67 0 181 _ 12:35=12:40 10 64 2 0 1 0 13 0 19 14 62 1' 186.. 12:40.-12:45 14 91 1 2 0 2 13 0 23 17 6.3. • 1 227. ' 12:45-12:50 10 89 1 1 1 2 15 0 8 13 .79 0 219. 12:50-12:55 8 62 1 1 1 1 12 1 12 14 ''61 1 175. 12:55-13:00 10 86 0 0 0 2 10 1 15 22 68' 1 2.15. gin Total Survey 219 1815. 18 23 8 18 241 7 356 306 1415 11.4437 PHF .84 89 .55 .45 .63 .6 .77 .5 .73 .88 .,93. .•75 .931 % Trucks 1.4 2.6 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 2 1 3 ..8 0- 2:.7 Stopped' Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fedis 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 12 0 Hourly Totals . 1 17.:00-12.00 98 888 7 14 3 6 114 3' 183 133 629 5.2'083 11:15°12:15 109 880 9 8 3 5 110 3 192 147 704 4.2174 11:30-1230 111 912 11 5 3 6 117 4 182 158 717 422T0 % 11:45-1245 120 914 12 8 3 9 119 4 196 173 7,22. 5.2285 : AMh . 12:00-13:00 121 927 11 9 5 12 127 4 173 173' . •7.86: 6 ' 2354 MEOW ZVI ExHiorr J( : • Re95% ~C~y 07-12-93 03:25PM P005 #05 .TUL--12-95 MOM 1S :2S 'rRAFPSC SMT°:'HY P. ed+ e.~'. ivi~ 'i usuv Nov-Emma COUNT .SUMMARY REPORT 'i~A2~1[Tr STS AT 135TH 'AVENUE N 147 1.2% P-.875 DATE OF COUNT: 07/10/93 O f131 DAY OF WEEK: Sat R 3 12 132 TnM STARTED: 11:00 TIM ENDED: 13:00 H --4-6 -4•j L* -4-126 ; _ 0 i 117 - 0t 0 T= 2.1$ u. P$0• P=.926 0 6 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY • VOLUME. 4 'F `lUCKS BY APPROACH . 0 -4'! I r* 240 Pl BY APPROACH. 18 0 14 8 P 11:50--112: 50 ITraff c Smithy:- T- ' ' . 9.1% P=. 55 f22 : TEV=295 Traffic Sapp (Service. `I VZ O P1sT'K74~ - t* BOT-1 N _RSf4t] n+ba grzr ~ TIME PERIOD W-EM?'• SgUD FROM - TO ALL, 11:00-11:05 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 1 3 0 :11 22.. 11:05-11:10 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 1 1 0 6' 16 . 11:10-11:15 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 .8 ' 14 12:15-11:20 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 3 0 .0' 6 18. 11:20-11:25 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 6' 19 11:25-11:30 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0' 7 :16 11:30-11:35 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 3 0 9. 22 11:3511:40 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 2 0 5 .;17 . 11:40-1.1:45 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 4 0 12 ,21 11:45-11:50 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 1 0 7 •20 11:50-11:55 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 2 ? 0 0 10 " 25• 111:55-12:00 0 0 0 0 1 9 G 3 1 0 0 1.1 ,25' 12:00-12:05 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 2 .0 0 1 8. ••2 Q, 12:05-12:10 0 0 0 D 1 9 0 1 i D 0 . 12 24 1W . ].2:10-12 :15 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 2 1 0. 9•. 23 ' 12:15-12:20 0 0 0 1 1 14 0 1 0 0 1 • 5-1 23 ` 12:20-12:25 0 0 0 0 2 13 0 U 0 1 0 lZ . '27: 12:25-12:30 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 1 0 1 0 10 23. 12:30-3.2:35 0 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 G 2 1 8' 26,• 12:35-12:40 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 2 0 L 0 10 25 - 12:40-12:45 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 1 2 0 0 10 24 12:45-12:50 0 0 0 1 2 13 0 1 0 0 0 13' . 30 12:50-12:55 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 12 -21. 12:55-13:00 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 12 28 Oe Total Survey 0 1 0 3 -16 223 0 27 17 21 3 218.•529 PHP 0 0 0 .38 •.6 .89 0 .5 .67 .38 .'75 89'.933.. ' $ `.trucks 0 0 0 0 6.3 .9 0 11.1 5.9 3.4.3 0. .•9 2...3 • Ped-s Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 11:00-12:00 0 1 0 0 5 89 0. 16 12 14 0 98 23 . 5 11:15-12:15 0 0 0 1 5 104 0 3.5 11 11 •1 102' 250 11:30-12:30 0 0 0 2 10 114 O 13 7 13 2' . 109. •2'7.6 11:45-12:45 0 0 0 2 ;1,3 128 0 13 8 7 3 111. .285 12:00-13:00 0 0 0 3 11 134 0 11 5 7 3: 120::2.94 EXHIBIT - O'-3 bAl OE R-9636 ~ • 'G~ ~y 07-12-93 03: 25PP✓. P004 905 Lij K s s 1 { L7,j EME11 C~ ® LL b m a) ~ J 0 = C7 S,T'- Now- IM - I DEPARTMENT Oi- TRANSPORTATION Transportation Development _ Accident Data Unit (503)-;78.23o9 August 10, 1993 FILE CODE: TRA 4-3 PHILLIP WORTH KITTLESON & ASSOCIATES 610 SW ALDFR STE 700 PORTLAND OR 97205 Enclosed is a computer listin; of the coded reports of motor vehicle accidents on The Old Scholls Ferry Highway, from 130th to 147th in Tigard, Beaverton, and Washington County. The computer listing is for the period of January 1, 1990, through March al, 1993. This information is provided in response to your recent request. Thomas Petterson. PE. PLS Accident Data Manager TP:plk Enclosure P WORTH.wP w EXHIBIT Transportation Building 46 fRer. 3 9I) PAGE . OF ~ Salem, OR 97310 rq7 , SENSE= lei q a , 8/09/93 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAIN1 - TRANSPORTATION DEVELPOMENT Phw% / ACCIDENT SUMMARIES BY YEAR _ BEAVERTON HIGHWAY 143, SCHOLLS HWY WASHINGTON MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01101190 TO 03/31/93 NON- PROP. FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL FATAL- PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- OFF- YEAR COLLISION TYPE ACDTS ACDTS ONLY ACDTS ITIES INJ. TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION ROAD 1990 ANGLE 1 1 1 1 1990 HEAD-ON 3 3 9 1 1 2 2 1 1990 REAR-END 3 6 9 4 6 3 7 2 6 1990 SIDESWIPE-FLEETING 1 1 1_ 1 1 1990 TURNING MOVEMENTS 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 3 YEAR TOTAL 6 11 17 13 2 9 8 12 5 10 1991 ANGLE 2 2 3 2 2 2 1991 REAR-END 1t 8 19 17 14 5 17 2 5 1991 TURNING MOVEMENTS 4 3 7 8 6 1 4 3 6 1991 NON-COLLISION 1 1 1 1 1 1991 PEDESTRIAN 1 1 1 1 1 YEAR TOTAL 18 12 30 29 23 7 25 5 13 1 1992 HEAD-ON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1992 REAR-END 10 7 17 15 13 4 14 3 7 1992 SIDESWIPE-MEETING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1992 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 3 4 1 2 2 3 1 4 1992 FIXED/OTHER OBJECT 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1992 PEDESTRIAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 YEAR TOTAL 16 10 26 21 1 16 10 21 5 14 2 1993 REAR-END 1 1 2 1 1 1 1993 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 1 1 1 YEAR TOTAL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 FINAL TOTALS 41 34 75 65 3 49 26 59 16 39 3 REPORT EZSUMSI i 2 mW m 61 q. mmv I 08/09/93 U R B A N N 0 N -S Y S T E MC [ D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF TIGARD SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- _ SERIAL DATE/ CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 4266 07/23/92 SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY INTER 3-LEG CLDY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI 0111-Y STRGHT 09 _ COUNTY THU 10A SW 13571! AVE 56 E 6 NONE DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 29 F E W NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE 1.1 1NJC PASS 43 F E W STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE °PDO PASS 21 F E W STOPPED 5474 09/08/92 SW SCROLLS FERRY HY INTER CROSS RAIN 8 FIX 1 MISC' PRI PSNGR STRGHT TOO FAST 51 I NONE TUE 04P SW 135TH AVE W 5 NONE WET DAY INJ POO PASS 19 F E W AVOIDING TOO-FAST 2 MISC. PSNGR INJC 02 M UN UN NONE 4857 08/18/92 SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY INTER 3-LEG CLR B TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NO-ROFWY NONE TUE 04P SW 135TH AVE CN 3 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 25 M S W 04 NO-YIELD 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NONE PDO PASS 35 M E S NONE 5268 07/20/92 SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY STRGIIT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NONE MON 08P SW 135TH AVE 1100 W 8 (2 ) DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 27 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 35 M W E STOPPED 8274 12/17/92 SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY STRGHT (UNDIV) SNOW C REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGIIT NONE NONE THU 03P SW 135TH AVE 400 W 7 (2 ) ICY DAY PDO PDO PASS 28 F E W NONE 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TOO FAST POO PASS DO F E W LOSTCONT TOO-FAST m 0 o` lpl, gig r 0 08/09/93~ U R B A N N O N- S YST E M C I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TIl AVE TO 147TH AVE 01101190 TO 03/31/93 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF BEAVERTON SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/, CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ N0.1 DAY- FIRM/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 7116 - 11/12/92 SW DAVIES RD INTER 3-LEG RAIN B TURN 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y TURN-L NO-F:OFWY 3ITY THU 08A SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY CN 1 NONE WET DAY INJ PDO PASS 32 M N NE 04 NO-YIELD 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONC 11 INJB PASS 34 F NE SW NONE 3 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGIIT NONE PDO PASS 31 M SW NE NONE 0557 01/18/93 SW MURRAY BLVD INTER 3-LEG CLR B TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-l NONE NONE MON 05P SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY CN 1 NONE DRY DUSK PDO„ PDO PASS 16 M N E NONE 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT RAN-SIG PDO PASS 26 M E W NONE DIS--RAG 5152 08/22/92 SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY STRGHT (UNDIV) RAIN G HEAD 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NONE CITY 5AT 12N SW DAVIES RD 323 E 8 (2 j WET DAY INJ INJC PASS 71 M E W SKIDDED 2 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STRGHT 13 POO TRUCK 40 M W E SKIDDED LEFT-CEN 5493 09/09/92 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NOTREC WED 09P SW SCROLLS FERRY HY E 6 NONE DRY DUSK INJ PDO PASS 44 F E W NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE fli PASS 28 M E W WAITFORL 7091 11/11/92 SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLOY I SS-M 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT 13 NOTREC WED 11P SW SCROLLS FERRY HY E 6 NONE WET DLIT INJ PDO PASS 19 M W E DR-SLEEP LEFT-CEN 2 MVOP PRI 01 STOP NONE PDO PASS 21 F E W WAITFORL 3 MISC PSNGR INJB 16 F UN UN NONE 0019 01/04/93 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGIIT OSI NOTREC MON 12N SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY E 6 NONE WET DAY INJ PDO PASS 23 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 27 F W E STOPPED 3 MISC PSNGR INJC 28 M UN UN NONE a ~ P gpl: 08/09/93URBAN N0N-SYSTEM AC I DENT L I ST I NG PACES-- 2 C1 MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF BEAVERTON SYSTEM/ INTER OR Di'STANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATII/ ACC- A PARTI- VEII LIC/ N0.1 DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE - 3340 06/24/91 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NONE MON 12N SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY W 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 51 M W E. NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 28 F W E STOPPED 5273 09/41/92 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT (19 NOTREC TUE 07P SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY W 6 NONE DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 22 F W E HONE FOL-CLOSE 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP IIONE INJC PASS 39 M W E STOPPED 74P7 11/28/92 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLDY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 139 NONE SAT 05P SW SCROLLS FERRY HY W 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 44 F W E ?IONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP 1VONE PDO PASS 63 M W E STOPPED 4991 08/20/92 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLR 3 PED 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE CITY THU 08P SW SCROLLS FERRY HY CN 2 NONE DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 44 F E W NONE 2 MISC PED PED STRGHT 01 /1 INJB 72 F NE SW IN-ROAD OTHER 6684 10/28,192 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLR D TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT PASS-.INT NONE WED 08P SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY CN 3 NONE WET DUNL PDO POO PASS 52 M E W NONE IMP-OVER 2 MVOP PRI ORi-Y TURN-L NONE PDO PASS 33 F E SW NONE 7013 11/05/92 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY INTER 3-LEG CLR H TURN 1 MVOP PRI NON-Y STRGHT NONE NOTREC THU 01? SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY CN 3 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 22 F SW NE NONE - 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L 01 POO PASS 35 F NE E NONE NO-YIELD 3 MISC PSNGR UN04 01 F UN UN NONE 4 MISC PSNGR UN04 03 F bA UN NONE 5 MISC PSNGR UN04 01 F UN UN NONE m i 0% I I E a 08/09/93"" " URBAN NON -SYSTEM At"C I DENT L I ST I NG PAGE'•-3 MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF BEAVERTON SYSTEM/ INTER OR DISTANCE ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CITY STREET FROM CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- FIRST/ INTERSECT DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME . SECOND (FEET) -LOC (LANES) L.1GHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE - 42110 07/20/92 SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY STRGIIT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 COUNTY MON 091" SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY 100 W 8 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 62 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE 11 PDO PASS 62 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 45 F W E STOPPED 5513 09/10/92 SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STRGHT 09 NONE THU 10P SW SCHOLLS FERRY HY 60 W 8 (2 ) DRY DLIT PDO POO PASS 18 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE ) POO PASS 42 M W E STOPPED 8258 12/16/92 SW OLD SCROLLS FERRY STRGHT (UNDIV) SNOW 8 FIX 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TOO FAST MAILBOX NONE WED 03P SW MURRAY BLVD 999 W 7 (2 ) ICY DAY INJ INJB PASS 41 F W E SKIDDED TOO-FAST - I m~ Q' - I jj~l NMI= P, 08109193 C O N T I N 0 0 0 S S Y S T E M A%` C I O E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 1 0 MP 6.63 TO 7.79 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 143, SCHOLLS HWY W INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) 'LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX. FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 5156 09106191 WASHINGTON ' 1705 INTER 3-LEG CLR H TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L 01 CITY FRI 09P BEAVERTON 0 6.63 6147. CN 3 NONE DRY DUSK INJ PDO PASS 44 F E S NONE NO-YIELD 2 14VOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE INJA CYCLE 32 M W E: NONE 0510 01/17/90 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR G HEAD 1 MYOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TOO FAST CITY WED 08A BEAVERTON 0 6.65 1525 W 3 (2 1 ICY DAWN INJ INJB PASS 56 M E 11 SKIDDED LEFT-CEN 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE INJC PASS 43 M W E NONE 3 MISC PSNGR INJC 43 F UN UN NONE 6214 10/20/90 WASHINGTON 1525 INTER CROSS CLDY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-N STRGHT 09 CITY SAT 04P BEAVERTON 0 6.75 1705 W 6 NONE DRY DAY INJ POO PASS 36 F W E DISTRCTD FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PR I N014'-Y STOP NONE INJB PASS 37 11 W I STOPPED 7395 12/04/90 WASHINGTON 1525 INTER CROSS RAIN B TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-R T00 FAST NJTREC TUE 12N BEAVERTON 0 6.75 1705 N 6 NONE WET DAY PDO PDO PASS 16 M E N LOSTCONT T00-FAST 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT N014E POO PASS 62 M N S SLOWED 4543 08/14/91 WASHINGTON 1525 INTER 3-LEG CLR F TURN 1 MVOP PRi OR1-Y TURIN-L WIDE-TRN NONE WED 08P BEAVERTON 0 6.75 1705 CN 4 NONE DRY DAY POO POO PASS 50 M N 'E NONE IMP-TURN 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NONE POO PASS 20 M N L- NONE 6909 11/21/91 WASHINGTON 1525 INTER CROSS CLR H TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE CITY THU 07P PORTLAND/U 0 6.75 1705 CN 1 NONE DRY DLIT INJ INJB PASS 17 M E 14 NONE 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L RAN-SIG ! INJC PASS 28 M W N NONE DIS--RAG 3 F11SC PSNGR v m INJB 17 M UN UN NONE 4 MISC PSNGR x INJB 16 M UN UN NONE A .N ME Me" ' 08/09/0 C 0 N T I N 11 0 U S S Y S T E M , A`btrwb 1 D E N T L I ST I N G PAGE 2 p 143, SCROLLS HWY MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 1471H AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 ~ INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERtAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-141LEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 4346 08/02/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 0 NONE FRI 05P BEAVERTON 0 6.76 1525 E 3 (2 ) DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 42 M E W NONE 0TH-IMP 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP' NONE POO PASS 20 M E W STOPPED 1751 03/27/92 WASHINGTO11 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT 09 53 NONE FR1 05P BEAVERTON 0 5.81 1525 E 3 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 17 F W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 45 F W E STOPPED 1 J 5044 09/09/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGIIT 09 22 NONE MON 09A BEAVERTON 0 6.90 0608 E 4 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ POO PASS 21 M E 11 NONE MACH-DEF 2 MVOP PUB OR1-Y S701' NONE INJC BUS 34 M E F1 STOPPED 3 MISC PSNGR INJC 00 M UN UN NONE 1627 Olt/03/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGIIT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 53 NONE WED 04P BEAVERTON 0 6.91 1525 E 4 (2 ) WE1 DAY INJ INJC PASS 55 M E 11 NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 30 M E It STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NONE INJC PASS 28 M E W 08 7806 12/27/90 WASHINGTON 1705 GRADE (UNDIV) CLR A ANGL 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NONE THU 03P BEAVERTON 0 6.97 0608 W 4 (2 ) ICY DAY PDO POO PASS 50 M E W SKIDDED OTHER 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE POO PASS 24 F S 11 STALLED 5920 10/06/90 WASHINGTON 1705 ALLEY 0-LEG FOG D REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y TURN-R WIDE-TRN NONE - SAT 06A BEAVERTON 0 6.98 0608 W 6 l~ DRY DLIT INJ POO PASS 28 F E Ii 07 IMP-TURN 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE ,a m I NJC PASS 19 F E It NONE D X 0 Z M5& 03/11/90 WASHINGTON 0608 INTER 3-LEG RAIN B TURN 1 MVO° PRI OR1-Y TUP11-L NO-ROFWY N03*EC SUN 07P BEAVERTON 0 6.99 1705 CIi 1 NONE WET DUSK PDO POO PASS 29 M N E 04 NO-YIELD n N VON MEN momm Em = mm = Em ffmillm '08/09/93"" C 0 N T I NUUUS SYSTEM A•t'C 1 DENT L I ST I NG PAGE 3 143, SCHOILS HWY MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01101190 TO 03/31/93 O ' INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CIIAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ N0.1 DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS 0 SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGIIT IMI'-LGHT PDO PASS 23 F E 14 NONE MACH-DEF 5023 08/23/90 WASHINGTON 0608 INTER 3-LEG CLR G SS-M 1 H-R PRI UNK-U STROM TOO FAST CITY THU 09P BEAVERTON 0 6.99 1705 W 6 NONE DRY DUSK POO PDO PASS 00 U E W LOSTCONT LEFT'-CEN 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 16 F W jr WAITFORL 0526 02/47/91 WASHINGTON 0608 INTER 3-LEG CLR B ANGL 1 MVOP PR% OR1-Y STRGIIT NONE 1 NOTREC THU 09A BEAVERTON 0 6.99 1705 CN 1 NONE DRY DAY INJ INJB PASS 35 M <E 14 NONE ~ 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NO-ROFWY PDO PASS 26 M N a NONE NO-YIELD 4198 07/28/91 WASHINGTON 0608 INTER CROSS CLR B TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGGHT NONE NOTREC SUN 11P BEAVERTON 0 6.99 1705 CN It NONE DRY DLIT INJ INJC PASS 20 F W E NONE 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y 1UR?4-L NO-ROFWY 49 INJC PASS 52 F S W OFD NO-YIELD 1639 04/04/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGIIT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 53 NONE THU 08A BEAVERTON 0 7.00 0608 E 5 (2 ) WET DAY PDO PDO PASS 19 F W E SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y.STOP NONE PDO PASS 35 F W E STOPPED 1497 03/23/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NOTREC SAT 03P BEAVERTON 0 7.01 0608 E 3 (II ) DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 32 M W E SLOWED FOL-CLOS 2 KVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP IIONE 11 PDO PASS 29 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI UNK-U STOP NONE POO PASS 00 U W E STOPPED 3476 06/13/92 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGIIT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGIIT 16 NONE SAT O7P BEAVERTON 0 7.01'0608 E 3 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 24 F W E NONE FOL••CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE 30 POO PASST 40 M W E SLOWED G7 7C 3 MISC PSNGR I NJC 24 M UN 6N NONE ^1 i w W ' MEN i 1 08/09/93~y C 0 N T I N000S SYSTEM A C I Df: NT L I ST I NG PAGE'-~4 MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 143, SCROLLS HHY ts' INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D-SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 4 MISC PSNGR UN04 01 M' UN UN NONE 1328 03/23/91 WASHINGTON 0608 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT 09- NOTREC SAT 03P BEAVERTON 0 7.03 1705 E 7 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ POO PASS 17 M W E NONE F01_-CLADS 2 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STOP NONE 11 PDO PASS 67 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 28 M W E STOPPED 4 MISC PSNGR j INJC 00 F UN UN NONE 1417 03/06/92 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT 09 NOTREC FRI 06P BEAVERTON 0 7.03 0608 E 3 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS- 23 F W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STOP NONE 11 PDO PASS 26 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP KONE PDO PASS 33 F W E STOPPED 4 MISC PSNGR INJB 26 F UN UN NONE 5 MISC PSNGR INJC 20 F UN UN NONE 7268 12/14/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT 09 NOTREC SAT 03P BEAVERTON 0 7.07 0608 E 3 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ INJB PASS 24 M W E HONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI STOP HONE 11 INJA PASS 52 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STOP HONE PDO PASS 22 M W E STOPPED 7742 12/22/91 WASHINGTON 1705 ALLEY 0-LEG CLR B TURN 1 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT IIONE 53 I NOTREC SUN 03P BEAVERTON 0 7.09 0608 E 4 2 WET DAY PDO PDO PASS 53 F E W HONE 2 MVOP PRI ORl-Y TURN-L NO-ROFWY 53 PDO PASS 18 M N E 06 NO-YIELD O _ fdE ~ O I ' w 1~ f ~ E 1~ me= go Effil ME mm Elio ( 08/09/93 C 0 N T I N110US SYSTEM A 1 DENT L I ST I NG PAGE -'5 143, MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 1117TIl AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 0 , SC~OLL'o HWY J " INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOG (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 1002 02/12/90 WASHINGTON CURVE (UNDIV) SNOW G HEAD 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGIIT TOO FAST NONE MON 12N RURAL 0 7.13 W 3 (2 ) SNO DAY INJ INJB PASS 19 M E W SKIDDED LEFT-CEN 2 MVOP PRI NON-Y STRGHT. NONE INJC PASS 32 F W E NONE 3 MISC PSNGR INJB 09 M UN UN NONE 4 MISC PSNGR INJB 11 F UN UN NONE 3794 07/13/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLOY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 COUNTY SAT 02P BEAVERTON 0 7.19 2205 W 3 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 32 F W E SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE 11 INJC PASS 18 H W E STOPPED 3 HVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE POO PASS- 29 M W E STOPPED 4 MISC PSNGR INJC 28 F UN UN NONE 5 MISC PSNGR INJB 52 F UN UN "ZONE 6 MISC PSNGR UN04 02 M UN UN NONE 5439 09/15/90 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGIIT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI N014-Y STRGHT 09 NONE SAT 12N BEAVERTON 0 7.21 2209 W 4 (~i ) WET DAY PDO POO PASS 24 M W E DISTRCTD FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE 11 POO PASS 20 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PR I UNK-U STOP NOIIE PDO PASS 00 U W E STOPPED 0096 01/02/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGIIT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NONE WED 05P BEAVERTON 0 7.21 2205 W 3 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 64 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 1 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE 11 INJC PASS 28 F W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE ~~yy POO PASS 39 M W E STOPPED !C G9 ~ m I ru RONNIE, f I , am IRS= i C 08/09/93 C 0 N T I N 0 0 0 S S Y S T E M A'teb I DE N T L I S. T I N G PAGE-- 6 143, SCROLLS HWY MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130Th! AVE TO 147TH AVE 01101190 TO 03/31/93 INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN; TYPE C RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ N0.1 DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 1455 03/2)/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLOY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI 0111-Y STRGHT TOOCLOSE CITY THU 12N BEAVERTON 0 7.21 2205 W 3 (4 ) WET DAY_ PDO PDO PASS 25 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STOP NONE - POO PASS 27 M W E STOPPED 3965 07/19/91 WASHINGTON 2205 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT 09 NONE FRI 02P BEAVERTON 0 7.21 1702 W 8 (2 j DRY DAY INJ POO PASS 19 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT NONE INJC PASS 50 F W E STOPPED 3 MISC PSNGR ) UN04 03 M UN UN NONE 0574 01/24/90 WASHINGTON 1705 INTER •3-LEG CLR E REAR i MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT 09 NOTREC WED 03P BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 W 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO POO PASS 25 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE POO PASS 63 F W E. STOPPED 0432 01/28/90 WASHINGTON 1705 INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORl-Y STRGHT 09 COUNTY SUN 11P BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 W 6 1 WET DUNL INJ POO PASS 19 F W E SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STOP. NONE INJC PASS 45 F W E STOPPED 3 MISC PSNGR INJC 00 M UN UN NONE. 1546 03/11/90 WASHINGTON 1705 INTER 3-LEG CLOY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORi-Y STRGHT 09 NONE SUN 05P BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 W 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 42 F W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PUO PASS 25 M W E STOPPED 2440 04/25/90 WASHINGTON INTER 3-LEG CLR D TURN •1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT PASSWRNG I NOTREC WED 03P PORTLAND/U 0 7.23 W 6 NONE DRY DAY POO POO PASS 48 M W E NONE IMP-OVER 2 MVOP PRI ORl-Y TURN-R TRNFRWNG POO TRUCK 44 M W S NONE IMP-TURN pq 011 08/22/90 WASHINGTON 1705 INTER 3-LEG RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 ONE WED 08P BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 E 6 NONE WET DAY PDO POO PASS 19 F E W SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 1 ~ I R ' 1_ 08/09/93 C 0 N T I N 0 0 0 S S Y S T E M A ,b--t!I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE 7 Q MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130141 AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 143, SCHOLLS HWY INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERiAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEER LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOG (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRIY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE POO PASS 24 M E W WAITFORL 7385 12/04/90 WASHINGTON 2205 INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT 09 NONE TUE 10A BEAVERTON 0 7.23 1705 E 6 1 DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 20 F E W SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 34 F E W WAITFORL 0880 02/21/91 WASHINGTON 1705 INTER 3-LEG CLR H TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L 01 NOTREC THU 06P BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 CN 3 1 DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 23 M E S NONE IMP-TURN 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NONE POO PASS 30 F W E SKIDDED 3 MISC PSNGR INJC 27 F UN UN NONE 4510 08/12/91 WASHINGTON 1705 INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 53 NONE MON 07P BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 E 6 1 DRY DAWN PDO PDO PASS 49 M E W SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI UNK-U STOP NONE PDO PASS 00 U E W STOPPED 5841 10/12/91 WASIINGTON 1705 INTER 3-LEG CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI UNK-U STRGIIT 09 NONE SAT 12N BEAVERTON 0 7.23 2205 W 6 1 DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 00 U W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE 11 INJC PASS 43 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 40 M W E STOPPED 4 MISC PSNGR INJC 31 F UN UN NONE 3706 07/06/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR & NONC 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TOO FAST NOTREC SAT 03P BEAVERTON 0 7.25 2205 N 3 (2 ) DRY DAY PDO 1'DO PASS 16 F S N NONE OTH-IMP .y~ 02/13/91 WASHINGTON 2209 STRGHT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT 09 WED 06P TIGARD 0 7.26 1804 E 4 (4 j WET DAY PDO PDO PASS 23 F W E - SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE f~Tl PDO PASS 22 F W E STOPPED o ) W J INNER ~s lim r} NMI 08/09/93 C 0 N T I N 0 0 0 S S Y S T E M A t -t i D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE - 8 143, SCROLLS HWY MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130Th AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01/90 TO 03/31/93 C INTER OR ROAD-- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES- SERINL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/. ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 2618 05/15/91 WASHINGTON 2209 INTER 3-LEG CLR B TURN 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NO-ROFWY COUNTY WED 07A TIGARD 0 7.29 5135 CN 4 NONE DRY DAY PDO POO PASS 50 F S SW -04 NO-YIELD 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE POO PASS 23 M SW NE NONE 5425 09/17/91 WASHINGTON 2209 INTER CROSS CLR B ANGI_ '1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NO-ROFWY COUNTY TUE 08A TIGARD 0 7.29 5135 CN 2 NONE DRY DAY INJ INJB PASS 20 F S N 04 NO-YIELD 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE INJB PASS 28 M E W NONE ) 7053 11/27/91 WASHINGTON 2209 INTER 3-LEG RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI 0111-Y STRGHT 09 / NONE WED 12N TIGARD 0 7.29 5135 E 6 NONE WET DAY INJ PDO PASS 33 F E W SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 25 F E W STOPPED 3 MISC PSNGR UN04 04 M UN UN NONE 4 MISC PSNGR U N04 01 M UN UN NONE f 1162 02/27/92 WASHINGTON 2209 INTER 3-LEG CI_R D REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 16 NONE THU 10A TIGARD 0 7.29 5135 E 6 NONE DRY DAY PDO POO PASS 19 M W E NONE TOO-FAST 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NONE POO PASS 61 M E S SLOWED 5424 09/14/90 WASHINGTON 2209 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR C REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 16 NONE FRI 05P TIGARD 0 7.30 5135 NE 3 (4 ) DRY DAY POO POO PASS 21 M SW NE NONE FOL-CLOS 2 H-R PRI IINK-U STRGHT NONE POO PASS 00 U SW N£ NONE 5863 10/02/90 WASHINGTON 2209 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR G HEAD 1 MVOP PRI- OR1-Y STRGHT TOO FAST NOTREC TUE IDA TIGARD 0 7.30 5135 NE 4 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ POO TRUCK 22 M SW N. SKIDDED LEFT-CEN 2 NIVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE 19 INJB PASS 65 M NE SW NONE Am 3 MISC PSNGR Q'= INJA 43 F UN UN NONE 03 ' 0 e f Eli ~ Effm y ~ 08J09/93 C O N i i N U 0 U S S Y S T E M A I D E N T L I S T I N G PAGE '9 MP 6.63 TO 7.79, 130TH AVE TO 147TH AVE 01/01190 TO 03/31/93 143, .SCHOLLS HWY INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE C RES-. SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WEATH/ ACC- A PARTI- VEH LiC/ NO./ - DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ R CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOG (LANES) LIGHT CLASS D SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 4039 07/24/91 WASHINGTON 2209 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLDY E REAR 1 MVOP PRI UNK-U STRGHT 09 53 COUNTY WED 06P TIGARD 0 7.35 5135 E 4 (2 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 41 M E W NONE FOL-CL.OS 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE 53 INJC PASS 38 F E W STOPPED 6580 11/12/91 WASHINGTON 2209 STRGHT (UNDIV) RAIN 3 PED 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TOO FAST COUNTY TUE 04P TIGARD 0 7.39 5135 E 4 1 ) WET DAY INJ PDO PASS 29 M E W LOSTCONT TOO-FAST 2 MISC PED PED UNK 15 INJB 20 F W E IN-ROAD 1 3201 06/12/91 WASHINGTON 1705 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLOY C REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 16 NONE WED 12N BEAVERTON 0 7.50 2205 E 7 (2 ) DRY DUNL POO PDO PASS 19 F W E NONE FOL-C:LOS 2 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NONE POO PASS 19 M W E SLOWED 6920 11/13/92 WASHINGTON 2209 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 1 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT 09 NONE FRI 08A TIGARD 0 7.73 5130 W 3 (2 ) WET DAWN PDO PDO PASS 27 M W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP .PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE 11 PDO PASS 41 F W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI UNK-U STOP NONE PDO PASS 00 11 W E STOPPED 4787 08/17/91 WASHINGTON 2209 INTER 3-LEG CLR D REAR 1 MVOP PRI 0111-Y TURN-R NONE COUNTY SAT IDA TIGARD 0 7.74 5130 CN 2 NONE DRY DAY INJ INJC PASS 28 F NE N SLOWED 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TOOCLOSE POO PASS 31 M NE SW NONE FOL•-CLOS 3 MISC PSNCR UN04 04 F UN UN NONE 2001 04/04/92 WASHINGTON 2220 STRGHT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 1 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT 09 NOTREC SAT 02P TIGARD 0 7.75 5130 W 3 (2 ) WET DAY INJ PDO PASS 18 F W E NONE FOL-CLOS 2 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE 11 INJC PASS 41 M W E STOPPED 3 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE III INJC PASS 42 F W E STOPPED Q ~ wTf C3 ~h I I~' i' ~ r ~II ~ e e t ***C0D'E••S EMPLOYED I N P R E V 1 0 U S ACC 11) E S*** _ CLASS CODE DESCRIPTION DRIVER ACTION 04 PROCD A/STOPPING 06 ENT STRT F/ALLEY/DR 07 ENTER ALLEY/DRIVE 08 HIT PREY ACC OBJECT DRIVER ERROR 01 L1RN FRNT OF TRAFF 09 HIT PARK/STOP VEN 13 DROVE ON WRONG SIDE 16 NO DEC SPEED/SLOW PED ERROR 01 CR AT INT/110 SIGNAL 15 WORK IN ROAD/SHLDR EVENT 11 FORCED BY IMPACT 22 INADEQUATE/NO BRAKE 49 RE DG OBSCURE) VIEW 51 I'ENCE OR BUILDING 53 WORK ZONE TYPE OF ACCIDENT CODES COLLISION WITH ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC -COLLISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE WITH: J A ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ON B ENTERING AT ANGLE - Ail. OTHERS OTHER ROADWAY C FROM SAME DIRECTION - 50TH GOING STRAIGHT 2 PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE D FROM SAME DIRECTION ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 3 PEDESTRIAN E FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 4 RAILROAD TRAIN F FROM SAME DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) 6 BICYCLIST G FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT. 7 ANIMAL H FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN, ONE STRAIGHT 8 FIXED OBJECT I FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 9 OTHER OBJECT J FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) & OVERTURNED 0 OTHER NON-COLLISION 1 `9I 1r III NEW I= ME mm sm sm ME Em on ME ME gm arm F= ME Q.1 **END*****411LND*******END*******END*******END*******END*******END*4%,to**END***** * * w * JOBID: JOB02435 * JOB NAME: HWYE85CA * USER 10: IIWYE85C * SYSOUT CLASS: A * ,OUFPUF GROUP: 2.1.1 * TITLE: * * * DESTINATION: 8393 * NAME: FRONT ST-ACCIDENT * ROOM: * BUILDING: * DEPARTMENT: * ADDRESS: * * * * * * * * * PRINT TIME: 16:15:14 * PRINT DATE: 09 AUG 93 * PRINTER NAME: R393.PR1 SYSTEM: ODOT * * **END*******END*******END*******END*******'END*******END*******END*******END***** M r4 P 0 PI • SEEN Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cross street Factor 89-4905 4. I M 11 28 89 135 MORNING HILL VBR 89-5466 4. NI P 12+31789 135 SCROLLS UNKNOWN 90-0468 4. NI P 01-31_90 135 11400 BLOCK HIT AND RU 91003186 _ IN P 07722791 135TH BRITTANY FELL ASLEE 92000422 4. NI T 01/20/92 135TH SCROLLS CARELESS 92001246 _ NI T 03/03/92 135TH 11500 BLOCK DUII 92002346 _ NI T 04/29/92 135TH 11400 BLOCK HIT AIND RU _ N-I-~-••1~---•~-t}4fY50-93-1 3 5 0 0••PAeIF~-,'.~,..,._..~.~_..._.....__ LOG 4. _ P 05/30/91 135TH BRITTANY DR LOG _ NI P 12/20/90 135TH MORNINGHILL UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI P 07/10/92 135TH SUNFLOWER AP H&R RADIO LOG NI P 07/01/91 135TH MORNING HILL UNK LOG 4. NI P 05 17_90 135TH MORNINGHILL UNKNOWN LOG OA IN P 10702790 135 SCROLLS FERR OFFICER AS LOG NI P 03/13/93 135 TH BRITTANY UNKNOWN k. earch complete Records matched: 15 3:36:57p 7-z3-93 EXHIBIT PAGE-OF Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cross street Factor 89-3537 4. NI P 08_31_89 SCHOLLS SPRINGWOOD HIT AND RU 89-5444 4. I P 12_3089 SCHOLLS 135 FAIL DRIVE 90-0884 4. I P 03 02_90 SCHOLLS NORTH DAKOTA DUII 90-2385 4." NI P 06-09`90 SCHOLLS 12200 BLOCK HIT AND RU 91001631 NI P 04714791 SCHOLLS SPRINGWOOD HIT AND RU 91003819 NI P 09/03/91 SCHOLLS FER SPRINGWOOD UNKNOWN 91003843 NI P 08/31/91 SCHOLL•S WASH SQ HIT AND RU 92001601 _ NI P 03/21/92 SCHOLLS FER 12100 BLOCK HIT AND RU 92002478 _ NI T 05/05/92 SCHOLLS FRY 121ST ' CARELESS 92002698 4. NI P 05/18/92 SCHOLLS FRY 12200 BLOCK HIT AND RU 92002927 4. IN P 04/12/92 SCHOLLS FER CASCADE HIT AND RU 92004537 4. NI P 08/29/92 SCHOLLS FY HIT-AND RU 92004838 4. IN P 09/18/92 SCHOLLS FY CARELESS D 92110093 4. NI' P 11/14/92 SCHOLLS HOWARDS ON S UNKNOWN-PR LOG _ IN P 05/16/93 SCHOLLS FER CASCADE LOG 4. NI P 06/05/92 SCROLLS NIMBUS UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI T 10/12/91 SCHOLLS FY N DAKOTA UNKNOWN LOG _ NI 7 04/17/93 SCHOLLS LOG _ NI T 12/19/90 SCHOLLS 121ST UNKNOWN LOG S. P 06/09/91 SCROLLS FER HWY 217 ON R S-1 UNKNOW CT] for more oneliners Records matched: 20 3:40:02p F-XMI13IT ~'VLf ` PAGE OF c~lJ Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cross-street Factor LOG 4. NI M 04_19_90 SCHOLLS 135 VBR LOG _ NI T 02705793 SCROLLS FY HOWARDS (FRO UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI T 07/20/92 SCROLLS FY UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI P 10/25/92 SCHOLLS FY GRNWY/SCOWS HIT AND RU LOG 4. NI T 08/01/92 SCHOLLS FER HWY 217 VEH SPUN I LOG NI T 08/01/92 SCROLLS FER 175TH ASSIST COU LOG NI P 08/03/92 SCHOLLS FY LEVITTS PKG° HIT AND RU LOG 4. NI P 10/06/90 SCHOLLS FER GREENWAY PLA UNKNOWN LOG _ NI P 08/01/90 SCROLLS FER EMBASSY SUIT FOLLOWING LOG 4. NI M 12_22_89 SCHOLLS 135 FOLLOW TO LOG 4. NI T 08/22/92 SCHOLLS SPRINGWOOD H&R KNOCKE LOG 4. NI P 12/18/91 SCHOLLS FY 217 SOUTH BO UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI T 09/25/92 SCHOLLS FER HOWARDS ON S HIT AND RU LOG 4. IN P 10/30/90 SCHOLLS FER SPRINGWOOD ASSIST AGE LOG _ NI T 04/29/93 SCHOLLS FER H&R LOG 4. NI P 01/08/92 SCHOLLS FER CASCADE UNKNOWN LOG _ IN P 01/01/93 SCHOLLS 7-11 LOT AUTO-PED LOG 4. NI P 07_04_90 SCHOLLS 121ST UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI P 09722791 SCHOLLS FY 121ST HIT AND RU earch complete Records matched: 39 3:41•:46p EXHIBIT PAGE OPEC 11 MIRIEN r Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cross street Factor 89-1714 1. NI M 04_25_89 WALNUT 99W FAIL TO YE 89-3875 1. NI M 09 21-89 WALNUT 99W EQUIPMENT 89-4355 1. NI M 10 25789 WALNUT 99W HIT AND RU 89-4355 1. NI M 10_25_89 WALNUT 99W HIT AND RU 90-0177 1. I P 01_13-90 WALNUT FONNER FAILURE TO 90003654 1. 114 T 09730790 WALNUT GRANT MEDICAL 91001729 _ NI P 04/20/91 WALNUT 10200 BLOCK DUII FE 92001704 _ IN P 03/25/92 WALNUT FOWLER JR HI CARELESS D 92002875 2. IN T 05/28/92 WALNUT ST 124TH PED DARTED 92003381 2. NI T 06/25/92 WALNUT 132ND HIT AND RU LOG 1. NI P 01/12/92 WALNUT PACIFIC HIGH UNKNOWN LOG _ NI P 05/24/93 WALNUT PACIFIC LOG 1. NI M 03_09_89 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN LOG 1. NI P 10702792 WALNUT FONNER UNKNOWN LOG 4. NI T 10/08/92 WALNUT 123RD-124TH RECKLESS LOG 1. NI M 04_12_90 WALNUT 99W F.T.Y. R/W LOG 4. NI P 08/28/90 WALNUT TIEDEMAN UNKNOWN LOG _ NI P 12/27/90 TIALNUT 121 UNKNOWN LOG _ NI P 01/05/91 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN LOG NI T 02/17/93 WALNUT PED/AUTO P CT] for more onel ners Records matched: 20 3:45:02p I C iw-.i 1 / liiJt~;T~ stiC (~I':'"~:lv~~,~~ I Vii? - l~ltn•;/ QGCL~ccY: u/~,/L /71/~1Ji' ~~i~.Yc:C~ 11 ' r C :L~ r~C : ! G~L,'~l uhf 6:;,4 !C rILKa, r. lldA-r.~ ~f: ;•'L;! fit'/ ExHlerr 17 PAGE ®F Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cyoss_streat Factor. LOG NI P 03/28/92 WALNUT 9900 BLOCK HIT AND RU LOG NI P 01/20/91 WALNUT WATKINS FIRECOMM LOG NI P 04/03/92 WALNUT GRANT UNKNOWN LOG 1. NI T 11/06/92 WALNUT VEH INTO H LOG 4. NI P 12_11_89 WALNUT TIEDEMAN CARELESS i LOG 1. NI T 12/09/91 WALNUT PACIFIC HWY UNKNOWN LOG _ 141 T 0.5/07/92 WALNUT PL 9800 BLOCK HIT & RUN LOG 1. *?I P 12/23/91 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN LOG 1. NI T 05/20'/92 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN earch complete Records matched: 29 3:46:36p pw Bob, A EXHIBIT Lf7 PAGE o OF..._.._~ hi 16 A ~ _:a Emmmum mom ENO No 0 MEN Section 4 Em Capacity Calculation Worksheets - Existing Conditions EXHIBIT~ a? ! PAGE _„_-..®F Owen- ® I MSEEN lOSOBTer n11RT Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:38:12 Pace 4-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----------------1050BASE - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW !35th Avenue Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.711 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.0 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: B approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected ights: Ignore Include Include Include Min.. Green: 0 28 0 0 28 0 5 65 0 15 66 0 anes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0' 1 1 0 Volume M ~dull, Cr s e Vol:220 5 150 5 10 15 15 850 195 245 1425 0 owth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 itial Bse: 220 5 0 5 10 15 15 850 195 245 1425 10 _ Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 220 5 0 5 10 15 15 850 195 245 1425 10 er Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 Hp Volume: 238 5 0 6 12 18 17 950 218 248 1442 10 ICE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 238 5 0 6 12 18 17 950 218 248 1442 10 aturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 tdnes: justment: 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.94.0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.17 0.33 0.50 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1518 32 1800 219 438 657 1684 2798 642 1693 3539 25 I apacity Analysis Module: of/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.15 0.41 0.41 C--it Moves: reen/Cycle: 0.20 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.19 0.66 0.66 plume/Cap: 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.79:0.62 0.62 + I evel of Service Module: Belay/Veh: 45.0 45.0 0.0 31.4 29.7 29.7 43.5 17.2 17.2 45.6 9.9 9.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAd3'Fctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.64 0.64 1.00 0.85 0.85 djDel/Veh: 38.3 38.3 0.0 26.7 2S.2 25.2 43.5 11.1 11.1 45.6 8.4 8.4 ueue: 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 30 30 9 30 30 ' EXHIBIT f ~ -l 1 PACE 1~ Nip 1111!111 p; 10 1050BASE.CMD Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:38:12 Page 5-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project #:1050 00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050BASE - Exist_ng P.M. Peak Hour Conditions Orr r Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report - 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative iraekie**kir,tie:IrsYF'k,tyth~r*itirlris•k**•k*a*•!r*~c*,k**Irc~r****t*Irkit,r***irk**,t•k*#~rx*+r*~***w*F*,tt** Rntersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue q *******ie*tieir,tie*irFtie**ie*•&t,ti•k•kie**ieir**#*•**kir*ir***iairst*ieirir*Fir*t*isk,t*ir*ir**,t*ir*ir*irtrirkir pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------1=--- -II- ---.--II---------------II---------------1 CM OpsAdjusted Lane'Utilization Module: lanes:' 0 1 0 0' 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1' 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT 'LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 I II-----------11---------------11---------------1 CM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1~ 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 irade: 00 o% 00 0% Parking/Hr: No No No No tea s Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 MEN - -I-------.--------I1---------------11---------------II---------------1 Ops f(rt) Adj Module: Case: :xx DO= xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5. xxxx 5 5 T I Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 1.00 1.00 -I---------------I1---------------I1---------------II---------------1 HCM Ops f (lt ) Adj Module : a s e: 5 5 ,a= 7 7 7 1 xxx..Ic x MUM 1 xxxx xxxx T Adj: 0.87 0.87 xxxxx 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.95 x--= xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxx,-c I 1 CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: n Wid Adj:' 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 iev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xx..cxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 arking Adj; xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 s Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 tea Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 T Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0..83 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 1.00 1.00 MIT Adj: 0.87 0.87 xxxxx 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx -CM Sat Adj: 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Sat Adj: 0.86 0.86 1.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 i--------------- 11 11-7 1 ogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: ignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > ume/Cap: 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.79 0.62 0.62 ivalType: 3 3 4 3 ogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.64 0.64 1.00 0.85 0.85 a EXHIBIT PAGE °m....t~ S. J~~ 1050BASE.CMD Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:38:12 Page 6-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050BASE - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Conditions - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Rntersection 7#2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Ilycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.482 Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.0 Optimal Cycle: 125 Level Of Service: B *~f '~C 'k''~'* ~'*•IC*71' ]~'~C ::'•k ~P •~'~'7~f ~f * ***]~'*•k***** *'~f **•k *'J~'~l ]E '~P ~'•k * ~''~f •A'* * * * * •iR ~f 7k ~•*~'*•k****•* tpproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ 9--------------- 11,-------------- ME, ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected fights: Ovl Include include Include in. Green: 28 0 50 0 0 0 0 59 0 22 88 0 anes_------ -1--0--0--0---- 0--0--0--0--0- 0--0--1--1--0 1--0--2-`0--0 Volume Module: lase Vol: 15 0 285 0 0 0 0 775 15 280 1380 0 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 0 285 0 0 0 0 775 15 280 1380 0 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 15 0 285 0 0 0 0 775 15 280 1380 0 er Adj: 1.00 =.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 HF Volume: 16 0 310 0 0 0 0 802 16 299 1474 0 CE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 final Vol... 16 0 310 0 0 0 0 802 16 299 1474 0 aturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.82 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 tanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1476 0 1476 0 0 0 0 3477 69 1693 3564 0 I ~ aDacity Analysis Module: Vfiol/sat: 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.41 0.00 rit Moves: Teen/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.23 0.70 0.70 tolume/Cap: 0.05 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.76 0.59 0.00 I evel Of Service Module: elay/Veh: 28.9 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 17.4 39.8 7.4 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 ogA djFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.57 0.57 1.00 0.61 0.62 Del/Veh: 28.9 0.0 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 9.9 39.8 4.5 0.0 Fee ue: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 20 20 11 26 0 EXHIBIT ` PAGE --.~~F 1050BASE.CMD Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:38:12 Page 7-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050BASE - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Conditions Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound .ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II-------------------------------1 WCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: ernes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Lane Group: L xxxx R xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx RT RT L T xxxx LnsInGrps: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 -1-------------- 11---------------11---------------11---------------I (CM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 7 0 3 2 trade: Oa Oo 0% 00 Parking/Hr: No No No No s Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 rea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 I--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------il---------------1 M Ops f (rt) Adj Module: Case: xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx T Adj. xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I---------------i1---------------II---------------il---------------1 HCil Cps f (lt ) Adj Module : ase: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Y.xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx FT Adj: 0.85 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx ------------I----------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: n Wild Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx tev Veh Adj: 0.96 xxxx 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 xxxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx arking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx us Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.xxxxx C•M Adj : xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxx'r. xxxx-x Adj: 0.85 xxxx xxxxx • xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx Sat Adj: 0.82 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nl Sat Adj: 0.82 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------11---------------1 rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: ignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > fume/Cap: 0.05 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.76 0.59 0.00 rivalType: 3 3 4 4 rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.57 0.57 1.00 0.61 0.62 EXHIBIT ~ - 5 Z 3 PAGE _ Jill! Kill 1050BASE.CMD Fri Jul 30, 1993 C9:38:12 Page 8-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. --Project 1050.00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS --------------1050BASE-_ -Existing -P_M_-Peak -Hour -Conditions ---y-------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1995 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 117 11 I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include Include Include include lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 11---------------~ olume Module: ase Vol: 5 0 15 0 0 0 0 285 5 10 285 0 growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 0 15 0 0 0 0 285 5 10 285 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 5 0 15 0 0 0 0 285 5 10 285 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IW'F Adj: 0.58 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0:87 0.87 0.96 0.96 1.00 al Vol.: 9 0 26 0 0 0 0 328 6 10 298 0 - -I------------------------------------------------------------~ djusted Volume Module: rade: 00-S 00-S 0% Oa Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.96 Truck/Comb: 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0..00 0.04 0,00 CE Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 lycl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 dj Vol.. 9 0 27 0 0 0 0 328 6 11 298 0 - - ritical Gap Module: RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical Gp: 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 xxxx xxxxx ---------------11---------------11------•---------11---------------; Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 639 639 330 667 642 298 298 xxxx xxxxx 333 xxxx xx;= iff otent Cap.: 452 452 863 380 450 787 892 xxxx xxxxx 675 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 2.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 1.6 xxxx xxxxx mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.98 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx -0.99 xxxx xxxxx ctual Cap.. 447 447 863 369 446 787 892 xxxx xxxxx 675 xxxx xxxxx a I 11 Level of Service Module: Breused Cap.439 447 836 369 446 787 892.xxxx xxxxx 664 xxxx xxxxx OS by Move: A * A * * * * * * A vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared Can.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx nused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx hared LOS: * * EXHIBIT h(5-3 PAGE -_.._...OF 1050BASE.CMD Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:38:12 Page 9=1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS _onditions-^__-___-__^_-_-_- ________________1050BASE-=_Existing_P_M__Peak_Hour C Level-Of- evel Of Service Computation Report 1905 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #5 Walnut Street and SP? 135th Avenue Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign fights: Include Include Include include ernes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: ase Vol: 15 275 0 0 130 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 krowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 275 0 0 130 10 '.0 0 10 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 15 275 0 0 130 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 0.41 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Onal Vol.: 37 672 0 0 136 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 Adjusted Voli«<- Module:-----((---------------((---------------((---------------( rade: 0% 0% 001 0% Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.99 Truck/Comb: 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0100 0.01 0.00 CE Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx cl/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 rck/Cmb PCE: 1:50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 dj Vol.. 38 672 0 0 136 10 10 0 10 0 0 0 ~ rit-ical Gap Module: RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 11 ritical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 -i---------------((---------------((-------------•--((---------------( Capacity Module: 4 nflict Vol: 146 xxxx xxxxx 672 xxxx rxxxx 850 850 141 865 855 672 otent Cap.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 579 xxxx xxxxx 285 340 951 280 338 504 Used Cap.: 3.8 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Impedance: 0.98 xxxx xxxxx 1.00,xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ctual Cap.. 1000 xxxx xxxxx 579 xxxx xxxxx 279 332 951 272 330 504 I i Level Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 962 xxxx xxxx:x 579 x..cxx xxxxx 269 332 941 272 330 504 OS by Move: A * vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cp.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 431 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx nused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 411 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx hared LOS: * * * * * * * A EXHIBIT J c 5 PE ®OF I Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:31 Page 1-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050EXSA - Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Conditions Turning Movement Report alume. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total_ e Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Th=,.i Right Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 3.25 5 175 10 5 10 10 895 100 175 .785 5 2300 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 125 5 175 10 5 10 10 895 100 175 785 5 2300 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Base 20 0 260 0 0 0 0 735 25 140 780 0 1960 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notal 20 0 260 0 0 0 0 735 25 140 780 0 1960 `4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street ase 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 270 5 10 155 0 455 Idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 270 5 10 155 0 455 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Base 10 120 0 0 135 15 10 0 5 0 0 0 295 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89al 10 120 0 0 135 15 10 0 5 0 0 0 295 Traffix System Version 6.5 (c) 1992 DA Licenseg(Mpg'gTRAFFI Jeri 6.5 B PACE _.OF 2 11 JJ~ MENEM Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:31 Page 2-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050EXSA - Existing Saturday Midday PeakHourConditi.ons - -Link - - Volume Report Ivolu,me NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total in Out Total Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 305 280 585 25 20 45 1005 920 1925 965 1080 2045 4600 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 305 280 585 25 20 45 1005 920 1925 965 1080 2045 4600 #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 280 165 445 0 0 0 760 800 1560 920 995 1915 3920' dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 total 280 165 445 0 0 0 760 800 1560 920 995 1915 3920 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street tase 15 15 30 0 0 0 275 160 435 165 280 445 910 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F otal .15 15 30 0 0 0 275 160 435 165 280 445 910 #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue ,Pas e 130 140 270 150 i30 280 15 25 40 0 0 0 590 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tal 130 140 270 150 130 280 15 25 40 0 0 0 590 EXHIBIT 2- PAGE z Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 3-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050EXSA - Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Conditions Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Ltersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Aven B 11.9 0.557 B 11.9,0.557 + 0.000 D/V 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Sch B 9.3 0.365 B 9.3 0.365 + 0.000 D/V 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V /C 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Ave A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C EXHIBrr - 5 7 mJ~- g PAGE Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 4-1 - - Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -Level-Of-Service-Computation-Report 1050EXSA - Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Conditions 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ~cle*(sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.557 ss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.9 timal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: B _proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - ntrol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include Include n. Green: 0 28 0 0 28 0 5 65 0 15 66- 0 nes_----- 0--1--0--0--1 0--0--1!-0--0 1--0--1--1--0 1--0--11--0 _I_ _II_ _II_ _II_ Volume Module: se Vol: 125 5 175 10 5 10 10 895 100 175 785 5 owth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 13se: 125 5 0 10 5 10 10 895 100 175 785 5 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fte uced Vol: 125 5 0 10 5 10 10 895 100 175 785 5 r Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.83 0.83 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.96 F Volume: 150 6 0 14 7 14 11 953 106 181 813 5 Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IN' nal Vol.. 150 6 0 14 7 14 11 953 106 181 813 5 ---------Flow- ---------------1~---------------II---------------1~---------------1 aturatian Module: t/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 justment: 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.98 0.98 Ines: 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.40 0.20 0.40 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1559 62 1800 520 260 520 1693 3175 353 1684 3524 22 -I-----------•-------------------------------------------------~ pacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.23 0.23 Grit Moves: een/Cycle: 0.17 0.17 1.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.68 0.68 flume/Cap: 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.34 0.34 I--------------- vel Of Service Module: Ifflay/Veh: 37.8 37.8 0.0 33.4 33.4 33.4 43.0 14.7 14.7 36.3 6.4 6.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1, 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.60 0.60 1.00 0.85 0.85 jDel/Veh: 32.2 32.2 0.0 28.4 28.4 28.4 43.0 8.9 8.9 36.3 5.4 5.4 ue: 5 5 0 1 1 1 0 24 24 6 12 12 EXHIBIT PAGE OF Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 5-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00- TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050EXSA - Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Conditions Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ********'F't'F't'k'k'F*'k************TM*******~~'*'k******~****~*************'++'**~*~+'*ie~r*~kie* ,Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue i proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ve ment : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I --II- -----------------------------------I CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: tanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 F----------- I --ll- ----------------------------------------I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 2 3 rade: 0% 0% Oo 0% Parking/Hr: No No No No us Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - CM Ops f(rt) Adj Module: ase: xxxx xxxx xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 T Adj : xxXY x,. .r rxxxx 0.85 0.85 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 w I -------------II---------------------------------------------I HC9 Ops f (lt ) Adj Module : 9ase: 5 5 xxxx 7 7 7 1 xxxx xxrx 1 xx)cc xxxx T Adj: 0.91 0.91 xxxxx 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx I ---------------------------------------------------I CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: n Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rIev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 arking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 [us Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CTM Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.85 0.85 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.91 0.91 xxxxx 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx Sat Adj: 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.98 0.98 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ILF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rl Sat Adj: 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.98 0.98 i--------------- II ---------II---------------II---------------I rogresssion Adjustment Factor. Module: lignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > lAch lume/Cap: 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.1€ 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.34 0.34 ivalType: 3 3 4 3 gAdjFctr: : 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.60 0.60 1.00 0.85 0.85 rro EXHIBIT ' PACE --......OF Ulm Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 6-1 IM qme Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ----------1050EXSA-`-Existing-Saturday-Midday -Peak -Hour -Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative **it***~F*****'!e****************'F,'*~'*`.."~'}'*'t',t*'it'ir***************k**tYr7rtcx*c*ck**aricicxic:cx Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.365 oss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.3 Dtimal Cycle: 125 Level Of Service: B reproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----I--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include in. Green: 28 0 50 0 0 0 0 59 0 22 88 0 anes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 11---------------H--------------- Volume Moduli. wae Vol: 20 0 260 0 0 0 0 735 25 140 780 0 owth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 20 0 260 0 0 0 0 735 25 140 780 0 Ner uct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uced Vol: 20 0 260 0 0 0 0 735 25 140 780 0 Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 ffiWiF Volume: 22 0 283 0 0 0 0 761 26 150 833 0 E Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nal Vol.. 22 0 283 0 0 0 0 761 26 150 833 0 aturation Flow Module: t/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1300 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 cat, justment: 0.82 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.98 1.00 nes: 1.00 0.00. 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1476 0 1476 0 0 0 0 3446 118 1676 3528 0 R -I------------------------------~I------------------------------~ pacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.24 0.00 it Moves: een/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51, 0.19 0.70 0.70 tlume/Cap: 0.07 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.34 0.00 -I---------------------------------------------li---------------I vel Of Service Module: lay/Veh: 29.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 14.6 34.9 5.5 0.0 Delay Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.54 0,54 1.00 0.50 0.62 jDel/Veh: 29.0 0.0 17.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 7.9 7.9 34.9 2.7 0.0 ue: 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 17 17 5 11 0 EXHIBIT PAGE ®F ~3f Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 7-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 1050EXSA - Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Conditions _ Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Inters--ction 42 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholl: Ferry Road proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - t - R L - T - R L - T - R -----------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------I CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:. i 0 0 0 1 0 ••0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Vanes: Lane Group: L xxxx R xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx RT RT L T xxxx IlLnsInGrps: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 I--------------- 11---------------li------------- --11------- --------1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: - mane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 7 0 2 4 rade: 0 00 05 Oo t rking/Hr: No No No No s Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 T Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ---------I---------------11---------------"II----------------I1---------------1 I RCM Ops f (rt ) Adj Module : se: xxxx xXXX 2 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj: xxxx >a= 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I---------------ll---------------I1--------------- 11---------------1 HCM Ops f (lt ) Adj Module : se: xrxx xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Adj: 0.85 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------11---------------I1---------------11---------------I M Ops Saturation Adj Module: Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Fev Veh Adj: 0.96 xxxx 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.98 xxxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ffl-rking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxx..cx s Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xx>= Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj: 0.85 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx CM Sat Adj: 0.82 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.98 1.00 r Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Sat Adj: 0.82 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.98 1.00 1--------------- 11--------------- •II--------------- 11---------------1 ogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: final Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > ume/Cap: 0.07 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 ^.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.34 0.00 ivalType: 3 3 4 4 tog.PLdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.54 0.54 1.00 0.50 0.62 r , EXHIBIT PAGE SAP I Fri. Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 8-1 M h. Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ---------1050EXSA _-Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Conditions - Level Of Service Ccmputation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Level Of Service: A proa;ch: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound vement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - •T R 11---------------!. Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled lights: Include Include Include Include anes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 11---------------~ taowth lume Module: se Vol: 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 270 5 10 155 0 Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 270 5 10 155 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 270 5 10 155 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.58 1.00 0.58 i.'60 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 1.00 Whal Vol.: 9 0 17 0' 0 0 0 310 6 10 162 0 I J! I djusted Volume Module: rade: Oo Oo G% Oo Cycle/Cars: 0.00 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.91 Truck/Comb: 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.09 0.00 CE Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 lycl,/Car PCE: 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 Trck/Cmb PCE: 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 dj Vol.: 9 0 17 0 0 0 0 310 6 11 162 0 - - ritical Gap Module: --------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical Gp: 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxxx xxxxx 6.0 xxxx xxxxx I-- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 486 486 313 506 489 162 162 xxxx xxxxx 316 xxxx xxxxx otent Cap.: 559 559 878 486 557 928 995 xxxx xxxxx 691 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 1.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 1.6 xXxx xxxxx mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.99 xx-s:x 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxxx ictual-Cap__ -553--553---878 -476--552---928 -995-xxxx7 xxxxx -691-xxxx-xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II II -I~1 -I reused Cap.: 545 553 861 476 552 928 995 xxxx xxxxx 680 xxxx xxxxx rivvred by Move: A * A * * * * * * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT LTR - RT Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxx---N xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxx'xxxxx nused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx rxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx hared LOS: * * EXHIBIT ~0 2- PAGE --..OF .a 39 I 11 1 1 111 MEN Fri Jul 30, 1993 09:26:32 Page 9-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ----------1050EXSA_-Existing -Saturday -Midday -Peak -Hour -Conditions - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---I--------------- Control': Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include Include Include anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I--------------- olume Module: ase Vol: 10 120 0 0 135 15 10 . 0 5 0 0 0 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 120 0 0 135 15 10 0 5 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ileduced Vol: 10 120 0 0 135 15 10 0 5 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -F Adj: 0.41 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 al Vol.: 24 293 0 0 141 16 10 0 5 0 0 0 ~ I fd-Cycle/Cars: justed Volume Module: ade: 0% 0% 0% 0% xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb : xY.xx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxrx xxXx xxxx xxxx E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Ifycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx Xxxx xxxx xxxx xa-.xx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx j Vol.: 27 293 0 0 141 16 11 0 6 0 0 0 ffa- - --------------=11--------------- 11--------------- li---------------~ ritical Gap Module: RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg itical Gp: 5.0'xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 11--------------- 11---------------~ Capacity Module:. flict Vol: 156 xxxx xxxxx 293 xxxx xxxxx 466 466 149 479 474 293 tent Cap.: 997 rxxx xxxxx 897 x::= xxxxx 570 570 842 502 565 792 Used Cap.: 2.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Imnedance: 0.98 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 mictual Cap.. 997 xxxx xxxxx 897 xxxx xxxxx 561 561 842 494 556 792 I--------------- Level Of Service Module: used Cap.: 971 xxxx xxxxx 897 xxxx xxxxx 550 561 836 494 556 792 ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Fared by Move: A * red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 631 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx sed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx .xxxx xxxxx xxxx 61!5 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx LOS: t :r * * * * * A EXHIBIT (Cel PAGE 3Y MEN EMME MEMEME -As LO a ® c c 0 :30 41 0 u. cz 00 t= W cn 0 =mom m m m m m m INS IF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:18 Page 1-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BWPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *With Walnut -xiended* Turning Movement Report Molume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total lffype Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 225- 5 175 5 10 15 15 915 200 250 1630 10 3455 dried 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lotal 225 5 175 5 10 15 15 915 200 250 1630 10 3455 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Base 30 0 340 0 0 0 0 790 65 460 1410 0 3095 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 30 0 340 0 0 0 0 790 65 460 1410 0 3095 n4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street ase 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 340 65 50 475 0 1010 Idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 55 0, 25 0 0 0 0 340 65 50 475 0 1010 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Base 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 605 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 al 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 605 u6 East Entrance ase 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 60E 0 1095 Idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 605 0 1095 8 Walnut Entrance Base 95 80 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 410 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 95 80. 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 410 #10 Central Entrance Ease 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 480 0 1145 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 480 0 1145 21 135th and Walnut lase J 95 315 20 70 0 0 0 0 150 0 10 660 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 0 95 315 20 70 0 0 0 0 150 0 10 660 #22 West Entrance lase 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 965 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C al 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 965 r~4 Traffix System Version 6.5 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ EXHIBIT J3 PAGE ~.~3F f ' TF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:19 Page 2-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BWPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *With Walnut Extended* - Link Volume Report - . tolume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 405 460 865 30 30 60 1130 1870 3000 1890 1095 2985 6910 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 otal 405 460 865 30 30 60 1130 1870 3000 1890 1095 2985 6910 n2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 370 525 895 0 0 0 855 1440 2295 1870 1130 3000 6190 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 370 525 895 0 0 0 855 1440 2295 1870 1130 3000 6190 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street lase 80 115 195 0 0 0 405 530 935 525 365 890 2020 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lotal 80 115 195 0 0 0 405 530 935 525 365 890 2020 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue fital e 360 225 585 220 370 590 25 10 35 0 0 0 1210 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360 225 585 220 370 590 25 10 35 0 0 0 1210 '=Do Last Entrance lase 45 5 50 0 0 0 445 605 1050 605 485 1090 2190 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 45 5 50 0 0 0 445 605 1050 605 485 1090 2190 v8 Walnut Entrance ase 175 210 385 135 90 225 100 110 210 0 0 0 820 laded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 175 210 385 135 90 225 100 110 210 0 0 0 820 rase 0 Central Entrance 125 165 290 0 0 0 415 535 950 605 445 1050 2290 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 125 165 290 0 0 0 415 535 950 605 445 1050 2290 121 135th and.Walnut Nase 410 220 630 90 105 195 0 0 0 160 335 .495 1320 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Val 410 220 630 90 105 195 0 0 0 160 335 495 1320 2 West Entrance se 10 10 20 0 0 0 415 540 955 540 415 955 1930 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 al 10 10 20 0 0 0 415 540 955 540 415 955 1930 EXHUT PAGE ~~7 'J J, I 11,11gli'll 1111 TF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:21 Page 3-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BWPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *With Walnut Extended* Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Aven C 16.3 0.706 C. 16.3 0.706 + 0.000 D/V 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Sch B 11.4 0.605 B 11.4 0.605 + 0.000 D/V 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut -D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Ave A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 21 135th and Walniit A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C EXHIBIT PAGE OF ~ Ell I TF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:21 Page 4-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00. TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BWPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Four *With Walnut Extended* Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ®~****,t********,t**fie,t,t,t,t*,t,t,r,t**,t,t*,t*,t,t**ie**~•k,rk~ ~***,t**,t**,a***********,t**,t**,e,t*** Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.706 'Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.3 ptimal Cycle: 124 Level Of Service: C pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include Include in. Green: 0 26 0 0 26 0 5 61 0 25 81 0 anes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ---------------I Volume Module: 11ase Vol: 225 5 175 5 10 15 15 915 200 250 1630 10 Wrowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 225 5 0 5 10 15 15 915 200 250 1630 10 j1duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 used Vol: 225 5 0 5 10 15 15 915 200 250 1630 10 ser Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FHE F Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 F Volume: 244 5 0 6 12 18 17 1022 223 253 1650 10 Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 final Vol.: 244 5 0 6 12 18 17 1022 223 253 1650 10 -------i---------------~i---------°-----~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 lanes: 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.17 0.33 0.50 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 1.99 0.01 Final Sat.: 1502 31 1800 222 443 665 1684 2824 616 1693 3543 21 I---------------- apacity Analysis Module: -Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0,00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.15 0.47 0.47 rit Moves: reen/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.48 0.40 0.20 0.64 0.64 lolume/Cap: 0.73 0.73 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.73 0.73 I---------------- evel Of Service Module: lelay/Veh: 39.4 39.4 0.0 29.5 28.9 28.9 44.7 21.3 21.3 42.4 12.3 12.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 1.00 0.85 0.85 ldjDel/Veh: 33.5 33.5 0.0 25.0 24.6 24.6 44.7 14.6 14.6 42.4 10.5 10.5 ,JNWue: 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 36 36 9 39 39 **,k,t,t*****,t****,t,r,t,t,r,t,t,t,t***,t*,t,t,t,t******,t*,r*,t*,t,t,t,t**,t,t*,t,r**,t**,t***,t•k*k,rir*,t**** EXHIBIT PAGE --...OF X39 I TF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993.13:09:21 Page 5-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95EWPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *With Walnut Extended* Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls.Road and SW 135th Avenue pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - -j--------------=jj--------------- ij--------------- jj---------------~ CM Cps Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Ianes : 0 l 0 Q 1 0''.0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT LnslnGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 j ij jj--------------- jj---------------j HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 rade: 0 0% 0% 00 Parking/Hr: No No No No rl.ea s Stp/Hr:' 0 0 0 0 Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 clusiveRT: Include Include Include Include JRT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 j I 11 1C(M1tO) ps f (rt) and f (lt) Adj Case Module: (rt) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 Case: 5 5 xxxx 7 7 7 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx j jj ij--------------- jj---------------j CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: in Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 arking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 lus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxx..xx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 VMFT Ad.j: xxxx xxxx xxxxxv.83 0.83 0.83 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 1.00 1.00 T Adj: 0.86 0.86 xxxxx 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat-Adj: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.9'4 0.99 0.99 sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nl Sat Adj: 0.85 0.,85 1.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 j--------------- jj jj jj ---------------j rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: lignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.73 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.73 0.73 on-rivalType; 3 3 4 3 off- rogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.850.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 1.00 0.85 0.85 EXHIBIT PAGE --OF Q2. ~ 0 TF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:21 Page 6-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BWPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *With Walnut Extended* ----------------------Level-of-Service-Computation-Report HCM Operations Method 1985 Base Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls perry Road ycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.605 'Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.4 lrl*:~proach: timal Cycle: 118 Level Of Service: B North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R -L - T - R L - T - R ontrol:r Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include in. Green: 15 0 50 0 0 0 0 58 0 36 88 0 tanes: 1 0 0 0 1 -11- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 -11- 1 0 2 0 0 Volume Module: ase Vol': 30 0 340 0 0 0 0 790 65 460 1410 0 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bs--: 30 0 340 0 0 0 0 790 65 460 1410 0 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 30 0 340 0 0 0 0 790 65 460 1410 0 ser Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 HF Volume: 33 0 370 - 0 0 0 0 818 67 491 1506 0 ICE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 final Vol.. 33 0 370 0 0 0 0 818 67 491 1506 0 - Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 anes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1693 0 1515 0 0 0 0 3245 266 1693 3564 0 I--------------- apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.29 0.42 0.00 Crlume/Cap: it Moves: een/Cycle: 0.12 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.81 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.84 0.52 0.00 I--------------- evel Of Service Module: Relay/Veh: 37.6 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 18.5 36.4 3.2 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.59 0.59 1.00 0.59 0.62 djDel/Veh: 37.6 0.0 15.9 0.'0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 36.4 1.9 0.0 eue: 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 22 22 17 18 0 ************************************************tkkkir*•k*******iririr•!r***Ir***•k•k*** EXHIBIT „ l c 7 PAGE OF ~ r F95WPM.CMD Sur_ Aug 8, 1993 13:09:21 Page 7-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS ----TF95BWPM-_-Background -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -*With -Walnut -Extended* bevel Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Tntersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Ipproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I 11 ---------------1 CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 ane Group: L xxxx R xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx RT RT L T X>= lffLnsInGrps: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 -I---------------11---------------I1---------------II---------------1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 Grade:' 0% 0% 0% 091; Barking/Hr: No No No No us Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type : < < < c < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4nft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 clusiveRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - I---------------II---------------II---------------11---------------1 CM Ops f (rt). and f (lt) Adj Case Module: (rt) Case: xxxx xxxx ? xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx f(It) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx I -----------I---------------II---------------11---------------II---------------1 CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Mn W i d Adj 1.00 xxxx 1. 0 0 xxxx xx= -c,xx >=xx 1. 0 o 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 I. 0 0 xxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx x}c= xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 xxxxx frade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1xxxx arking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 'xxxx 1.00 rxxxx kT eaAdj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxtxxx Xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj:. 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx CM•Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 9sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7LF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 --------•---I--------------- 11--------------- 11------------ ---11--------------- I rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: Signal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > wa7olume/Cap: 0.16 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.84 0.52 0.00 rivalType: 3 3 4 4 ogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.59 0.59 1.00 0.59 0.62` EXhzJ®IT K - 7r PAGE --..O TF95WPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:21 Page 8-1 Kittelson and Associates, In - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALE-RTSONS TF95BWPM - Background Weekday PM Peal: Hour *With Walnut Extended* Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative *7k**~k***•k*7t*7kltdcit*ic~k*~tak**7k**'kdt~ktY'k****ir****7A'itjt**'*'IrIt****tk~ct4*ic7F*14****r******ris-'.~rsr{~y4 Intersection #4 Scholis Ferry Road and Walnut Street Level Of Service: D pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ - 11 ontrol: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled fights: Include Include include include ,apes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I----------- olume Module: ase Vol: 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 340 65 50 475 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 55 0 25 0 0 0 .0 •340 65 50 475 0 Pduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 340 65 50 475 0 User.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 1.00 11nal Vol.: 61 0 28 0 0 0 0 391 75 52 496 0 I--------------- wr.djusted volume Module: MENU off~ rade: 01 00 00 011 Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xacxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1..10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 ~scl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.. 67 0 31 0 0 0 0 391 75 57 496 0 Critical Gap Module: Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg `=itical Gp: 6..0 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Mnflict Vol: 977 977 233 1042 1014 496 496 xxxx xxxxx 466 xxxx xxxxx otent Cap.: 279 279 767 177 231 633 633 xxxx xxxxx 736 xxxx xxxxx % Used Cap.: 24.1 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx -mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.98 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx ctual Cap.: 266 266 767 165 220 633 633 xxxx xxx.xx 736 xxxx xxxxx I--------------- : eve1 Of Service Module x nused Cap.: 199 266 737 165 220 633 633 xxxx xxx;xx 679 xxxx xxxxx J OS by Move : D * A * * * * * * A vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT aced Cap. :•xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 6-1 xtx.:.x.x Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Shared LOS: * * EXHI®IT ~ - , y~ PAGE IffF95WPM.CMD Sun Auc 8, 1993 13:09:22 Page 9-1 b~ I Kittelson and Associates, Inc:. - Project : 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS - -----TF95BWPM-_-Background -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -*With -Walnut -Extended* Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ntersection #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - - 11--------------- ontrol: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include include Include Include anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 i! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 olume Module: Base Vol: 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5, 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 educe Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 per Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NEW Adj: 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 9.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 nal Vol.: 6 420 0 0 224 5 2 0 11 0 0 0 I--------------- djusted Volume Module: Irade: 0% 00 0% OF Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxyx xxxx X_*= Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xX XX xxxx xxxx M-E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 .Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx rck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx =rx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.. 7 420 0 0 224 5 2 0 12 0 0 0 Critical Gat) Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical G'o: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 11--------------- o1--------------- 11---------------~ apacity Module: nflictVol: 229 rxxx xxxxx 420 xxxx x)o= 653 653 227 667 655 420 Jotent Cap.: 956 xxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx 443 443 773 380 442 686 Used Cap.: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 mpedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ictual Cap.: 956 xxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx 443 443 773 376 442 686 - I evel Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 950 x>= xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx 441 443 761 376 442• 686 S by Move: A * ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 705 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx Y-xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 691 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * A r- EXHIBIT k -73 PACE N F9FWPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:09:22 Page 10-1 Kitt------el-s--on and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - - TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----TF95EWPM-_-Background -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -*With -Walnut -Extended* - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ntersection r21 135th and Walnut Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---11--------------- 11---------------I ontrol: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include include include lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 - - 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ olume Module: lase Vol: 0 95 315 20 70 0 0 0 0 150 0 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 0 95 315 20 70 0 0 0 0 150 0 10 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 0 95 315 20 70 0 0 0 0 150 0 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Mal Vol.: 0 106 350 22 78 0 0 0 0 167 0 11 I djusted Volume Module: rade: 0 % Oo 0% 01 o, Cycle/Cars: xxxx x:= xxxx xxxx X C,;x xxxx xxxx xxxx % mr,,ck/Co«b: X-%= xxx X-'>= x yx xxxx xxxx xxxxxx CE A.d3: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 i.10 1.10 cl/Car PCE: Y-%= xxxx xxxx YON= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Gmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.: 0 106 350 24 78 0 0 0 0 183 0 12 Critical Gap Module: F- Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg itical Gp: 5.O.Yxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 - ---------------l Capacity Module: flict Vol: 78 xxxx xxxxx 456 xxxx xxxxx 567 556 78 381 381 281 tent Cap.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx 445 506 1000 636 636 723 % Used Cap.: 0.0 xxrxx xxxxx 3.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.8 0.0 1.7 pedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.98 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xx_.cx 1.00 0.99 tual Cap.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx• 432 496 1000 623 623 723 I------------------------------11------------------------------~ evel of Service Module: used Cap.1000 icxxx xxxxx 721 xxxx xxxxx 432 496 1000 440 623 710 S by Move : * * * A * * * * * A * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx fared sed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx v....x..,-~- xxxx xLrxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS : * * EXHIBIT J ~3 PAGE - ....s4P „ all TF95OPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:26 Page 1-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BOPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Flour *'W/O Walnut Extended* Turning Movement Report kI lum e Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total e e Laft Thru Right Left Thru.Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Base 270 5 175 5 10 .5 15 915 180 250 1630 10 3460 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 atal 270 5 175 5 10 15 15 915 180 250 1630 10 3480 R2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 30 0 320 0 0 0 0 790 65 430 1415 0 3050 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 gotal 30 0 320 0 0 0 0 790 65 430 1415 0 3050 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street gase 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 340 30 20 475 0 900 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4otal 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 340 30 20 475 0 900 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Base 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 605 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Otal 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 605 6 East Entrance ase U 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 1170 Idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C0 ta1 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 1170 Walnut Entrance Base 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 145 Ndded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 145 '"10 Central Entrance Iase 55 0 1.25 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 1200 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 1200 121 135th and Walnut Base 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 760 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10- tal 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 760 -#22 West Entrance Led e 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 375 5 10 515 0 915 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 al 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 375 5 10 515 0 915 I<- 7 Traffix System Version 6.5 (c) 1992 DA Li. ~e~" o & Associ.• Elm C 95OPM.(:MD Sun Aug'8, 1993 13:37:27 Page 2-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----TF95BOPM-__Background -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -*W/O UWalnu__Extended* - Link•Volume Report olume NB Link SE Link EB Link WB Link Total .Type, In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume 91 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Base 450 440 890 _ 30 30 60 1110 1915 3025 1890 1095 2985 6960 Fdded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 450 440 890 30 30 60 1110 1915 3025 1890 1095 2985 6960 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 350 495 845 0 0 0 855 1445 2300 1845 1110 2955 6100 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 350 495 845 0 0 0 855 1445 2300 1845 1110 2955 6100 94 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Base 35 50 85 0 0 0 370 500 870 495 350 845 1800 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 35 50 85 0 0 0 370 500 870 495 350 845 1800 Ifided Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue se 360 225 585 220 370 590 25 10 35 0 0 0 1210 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 300 225 585 220 370 590 25 10 35 0 0 0 1210 R6 East Entrance ase 65 5 70 0 0 0 465 640 1105 640 525 1165 2340 added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 65 5 70 0 0 0 465 640 1105 640 525 1165 2340 #8 Walnut Entrance ase 45 45, 90 75 45 120 25 55 80 0 0 0 290 Idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 45 45 90 75 45 120 25 55 80 0 0 0 290 11io Central Entrance %ase 180 210 390 0 0 0 380 525 905 640 465 1105 2400 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I otal 180 210 390 0 0 0 380 525 905 640 465 1105 2400 #21 135th and Walnut ase 410 260 670 160 135 295" 0 0 0 190 365 555 1520 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lotal 410 260 670 160 135 295 0 0 0 190 365 555 1520 22 West Entrance Rase 10 i5 25 0 0 0 380 520 900 525 380 905 1830 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rt-al 10 15 25 0 0 0 380 520 900 525 380 905 1830 EXHIB PAGE OF q -7 III J 11, TF95OPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:28 Page 3-1 Kittel.son and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS _-----_TF95BOPM--Background -Weekday _PM_Peak _Hour -*W/O-Walnut _Extended* - Impact Analysis Report Level of Service ~mIntersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # i Scholls Road and SW 135th Aven C 17.1 0.741 C 17.1 0.741 + 0.000 D/V # 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Sch B 9.5 0.585 B 9.5 0.585 + 0.000 D/V n 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Ave A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C _ ExIiIsIT r~ 7 7 PME 4F,.s....., r MINIMIZE, TF95OPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:28 Page 4-1 - Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BOPM - Background Weekday Pin Peak Hour *W/O Walnut Extended* - Level Of Service Computation Report -1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.741 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.1 Oatimal Cycle: 124 Level Of Service: C Approach': North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -1---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1 Control:- Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include Include :in. Green: 0 26 0 0 26 0 5 61 0 25 81 0 Wanes : 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Volume Module: t ase Vol: 270 5 175 5 10 15 15 915 180 250 1630 10 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 270 5 0 5 10 15 15 915 180 250 1630 10 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 270 5 0 5 10 15 15 915 180 250 1630 10 User Ad3: i.v^ 1.00 0 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ 0 CCE Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 Volume: 293 5 0 6 12 18 17 1022 201 253 1650 10 Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M-LF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inal Vol.. 293 5 0 6 12 18 17 1022 201 253 1650 10 I--------------- II--------------- II---------------- II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Wdjustment: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.17 0.33 0.50 1.00 1.67 0.33 1.00 1.99 0.01 final Sat.: 1507 26 1800 207 413 620 1684 2904 571 1693 3543 22. 1-=--------------il--- -----------II---------------11---------------I apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.47 0.47 frit Moves: reen/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.49 0.49 0.20 0.65 0.65 Volume/Cap: 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.72 0.72 0.75 0.72 0.72 I---------------II---------------il--------------- 11---------------1 evel Of Service Module: Relay/Veh: 54.7 54.7 0.0 30.1 26.6 26.6 44.7 20.3 20.3 41.7 11.8 11.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.35 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 0.85 0.85 1djDel/Veh: 46.5 46.5 0.0 25.6 22.6. 22.6 44.7 13.7 13.7 41.7 10.0 10.0 ue: 12 12 0 1 1 1 1 34 34- 9 39 39 0$IT ` 7 TF950PM. CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:29 Page 5-1 - 6-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BOPM Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *W/O Walnut-Extended* ________________rLevel Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road, and SW 135th Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R - T - R L - T - R _ -I--------------- II II II---------------I CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT LnslnGrps: 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1--------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------1 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 rade: Oo 00-S 0% 00 JaNo No No No us Stp/Hr : 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 BftcclusiveRT: Include include include include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 I II II--------------- II---------------I CM Ops f,(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: (rt) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 (It) Case: 5 5 xxxx 7 7 7 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx I II II--------------- (I----------------I CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: In Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 arking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 11us Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ea Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 T Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx 1.00 1.00 T Adj: 0.86 0.86 xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.99 IFsr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.99 i 11 11 11 rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: lignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Can: 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.72 0.72 0.75 0.72 0.72 rivalType: 3 3 4 3 . lrrogAdjPctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 0.85 0.85 ® Exai®rr ( - 7 q PAGE TF95C•PM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1943 13:37:29 Page 6-•1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ------TF95BOPM-_-Background -Weekday -PM -Peak Hour -*W/O -Walnut -Extended* - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative k*aktk**irt•sY+F*•k*#•*irietlrk•****ir~ri•ie**ir*irir*tiF•k•*•k***ir*****~•*I•**1•ic*dr***tklc•lrir*kk*Yr*ick•k***rvkde*u Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Rcad Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.585 Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.5 ptimal Cycle: 118 Level of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound --movement:. L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Protected--- - Protected--- Protected--- Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include t,:anes: in. Green: 10 0 50 0 0 0 0 58 0 41 88 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 olume Module: ase Vol: 30 0 320 0 0 0 0 790 65 430 1415 0 °Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 30 0 320 0 0 0 0 790 65 430 1415 0 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rduced Vol: 30 0 320 0 0 0 0 790 65 430 1415 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HF Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 rPHF Volume: 33 0 348 0 0 0 0 818 67 459 1512 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 final Vol.: 33 0 348 0 0 0 0 818 67 459 1512 0 11- Saturation Flow Module: Kat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 IIIIIII djustment: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.15 1.00 2.00 0.00 Eff final Sat.: 1693 0 1515 0 0 0 0 3245 266 1693 3564 0 apacity Analysis Module: of/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.27 0.42 0.00 rit Moves: treen/Cycle: 0.08 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.38 0.85 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.24 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.71 0.50 0.00 K I--------------- evel Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.2 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 18.5 27.2 2.0 0.0 elay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 _ rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.59 0.59 1.00 0.58 0.62 %LijDel/Veh: 41.2 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 27.2 1.2 0.0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 22 22 14 14 0 EXHIBIT PAGE -OF _ TF950PM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:29 Page 7-1 - 1i Kittelsonand Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95BOPM - Background Weekday PM Peak Hour *W/O Walnut Extended* -p________--------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ;r ,rs5i7u`'*~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~..~.****k***,t*,t,t,t*****,r*****,t*,t***,t****~F**,r**,r*3r***************s'rlr*9r* Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1_----------- I 11 --------------CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 ..Lane Group: L xxxx R xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx RT RT L T xxxx MI. LnslnGrps: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 F - I --II---------------II---------------11---------------i HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 W. Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 Grade: 0% 0% Oo 0 arking/Hr: No No No No us Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 y'ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnf t Ped/Fir : 0 0 0 C' alkr.clusiveRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Crt) Ops f (rt) and f (lt) Adj Case Module: t) Case: xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx xxtx xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxyx i--------------- 11----------------i1------ -------II---------------I CM Ops.Saturation Adj Module: In Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 xxxxx rade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1A0 xxxx xxxx X> xx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx arking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxx.x xxxxr. xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxxx Rus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx.xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx tTT ea Ad': 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xs;xxx Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx rxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xx":a x xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0'.99 1.00 sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.00 I I 11 11 Rrogresssion.Adjustment Factor Module: ignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.24 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.71 0.50 0.00 0 rivalTyge : 3 3 a a rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.59 0.59 1.00 0.58 0.62 Alffib. EXHIBIT IMAGE OF .o.~ TF95OPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:29 Page 8-1 6 ____------'-Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS - TF95BOPM=-Background -Weekday -PM-Peak -Hour -*W/O tIalnut-Extended* Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ir~e~Yir*yt~Y*yY*tk*irsFsl'+ttir********sFir~k***~t*ir'irir***+t*akstic~t lc***tir~F~Y~kir**~F***dr~triric+F*i**~Firir***aF~t*~k~k Intersection #4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----1(------------------------------~ .Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled WA_ fights: Include include Include Include anes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I--------------- olume Module: Wase Vol: 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 340 30 20 475 0 Growth Adj: 1.J0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 340 30 20 475 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 25 0 10 0 0 0 0 340 30 20 475 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 1.00 11nal Vol.: 28 0 11 0 0 0 0 391 34 21 496 0 I--------------- ----------------I~---------------~ djusted Volume Module: rade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx %.Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx E Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 .1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 tCcl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx DO= xXXX X>= Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx y-.7xx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxY dj Vol.. 31 0 12 0 0 0 0 391 34 23 496 0 - - Critical Gap Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical Gp. 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 11--------------- 11--------------- Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 925 925 213 954 943 496 496 xxxx xxxxx 425 xxxx xxxxx lotent Cap.: 305 305 787 204 253 633 633 xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 10.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 3.0 xxxx xxxxx mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.98 xxxx xxxxx ctual Cap.. 299 299 787 198 248 633 633 xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx I--------------- ; Level Of Service Module: used Cap.: 269 299 775 198 248 633 633 xxxx xxxxx 752 xxxx xxxxx S by Move : C * A * * * * * * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: rxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xx xxx x xxx xxxx xxxxx used Cap.: xxxx, xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx "~hhared LOS : * * EXHIEIT' PACE OF -)s 3 C 95OPM.CMD Sun Aug 8, 1993 13:37:29 Page 9-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project:- 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ------TF95BOPM-_-Background -Weekday _PM-Peak -Hour -*W/O-Walnut -Extended* Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative 1M * * 'A' * 'A' 7~' Sal 'k 1~' :t * * * 'A' * * * * * '~f 'A' * '~C 'k * 'A' * * * * 1 4. R ~f 'k * * * * * '~l' * * * * * * '~f * •k * 1( 'li' * * * * 1C 7E 1C * •k Intersection #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R (---------------l~--------------- ontrol: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include Include include anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 - - olume Module: I tase Vol- 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 edu.ct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (educed Vol: 5 355 0 0 215 5 15 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 9.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Onal Vol.: 6 420 0 0 224 5 2 0 11 0 0 0 - - I djusted Volume Module: rade: 00 Oo 0% 00 Cycle/Cars: k'xxx xxxx xY.xx XXKx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxrx Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx =1= xxxx xxxx now - E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 kcl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx 0= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trek/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.. 7 420 0 0 224 5 2 0 12 0 0 0 Critical Gap----- Modul-e-:-------- T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20..0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg fritical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 - ---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 229 xxxx xxxxx 420 xxxx xxxxx 653 653 227 667 655 420 lotent Cap.: 956 xxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx 443 443 773 380 442 686 Used Cap.:. 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx. 0.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 -mpedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ctual Cap.: 956 xxxx .xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx 443 443 773 376 442 686 -~---------------..-I. Level Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 950oxxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx 441 443 761 376 442 686 OS by Move: A * ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xk x 705 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx= nused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 691 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx hared LOS: * * * * * * * A ` EXHIBIT PAGE --OF Emma= Nil' I A [IEEE =Emma Sections 6 Capacrty Calculation 1 7 Aft Worksheets - 1994 With Project Conditions EXHIBIT kF.95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:40 Page 1-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95WPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut Extended** --7-------------------------- ----------------------------Movement Report Turning olume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total ype Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 225 5 175 5 10 15 15 945 200 250 1660 10 3515 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F otal 225 5 175 5 10 15 15 945 200 250 1660 10 3515 #2 Old Scholls, Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 95 0 370 0 0 0 0 790 130 490 1410 0 3285 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 total 95 0 370 0 0 0 0 790 130 490 1410 0 3285 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Base • 55 0 35 0 0 0 0 420 65 70 550 0 1195 ,Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 55 '0 35 0 0 0 0 420 65 70 550 0 1195 v5 Walnut.Street and SW 135th Avenue Base 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 685 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11tal 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 685 6 East Entrance lase 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 605 0 1095 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 otal 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 605 0 1095 ,8 Walnut Entrance Base 95 80 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 410 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 95 80 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 410 ~10 Central Entrance ase 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 480 0 1145 qdded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 _25 480 0 1145 121 135th and Walnut Base 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 760 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 760 422 West Entrance ase 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 965 Idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 al 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 965 Traffix System Version 6.5 (c) 1.992 DA Licensed to K elso & Associ° EXHIBIT ' S PAGE ~®I:......~,~ ri TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:41 Page 2-1 - L - - Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ------TF95WPM-_-Near_Term -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -**With -Walnut -Extended** - - Link Volume Report Volume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type In Out Total, ~In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Base 4Q5 460 865 30 30 60 1160 1900 3060 1920 1125 3045 7030 Wdded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 405 460 865 30 30 60 1160 1900 3060 1920 1125 3045 7030 "2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 465 620 1085 0 0 0 920 1505 2425 1900 1160 3060 '6570 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Total .465 620 1085 0 0 0 920 1505 2425 1900 1160 3060 6570 544 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Base 90 135 225 0 .0 0 485 605 1090 620 455 1075 2390 gff~dded 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 90 135 225 0 0 0 485 605 1090 620 455 1075 2390 lided Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue se 390 255 645 260 410 670 35 20 55 0 0 0 1370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 390 255 645 260 410 670 35 20 55 0 0 0 1370 96 East Entrance Base 45 5 50 0 0 0 445 605 1050 60S 485 1090 2190 madded C 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 45 5 50 0 0 0 445 605 1050 605 485 1090 2190 JIS Walnut Entrance ase 175 210 385 135 90 225 100 i10 210 0 0 0 820 idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 Total 175 210 385 135 90 225 100 110 210 0 0 0 820 R10 Central Entrance ase 125 165 290 0 0 0 415 535 950 605 445 1050 2290 iddded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 125 165 290 0 0 0 415 535 950 605 445 1050 2290 #21 135th and Walnut ase 410 260 670 160 135 295 0 0 0 190 365 555 1520 lidded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 410 260 670 160 135 295 0 0 0 190 365 555 1520 22 West Entrance ase 10 10 20 0 0 0 415 540 955 540 415 955 1930 cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .'tal 10 10 20 0 0 0 415 540 955 540 -415 955 1930 EXHIBIT e PAGE TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:43 Page 3-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95WPM___Near-Term-Weekday _PM-Peak -Hour -**With 'Walnut -Extended**--_-_-_- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C L x 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Aven C 16.4 0.715 C 16.4 0.715 + 0.000 D/V 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Sch B i3.4 0.695 B 13.4 0.695 + 0.000 D/V # 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C F 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Ave A xxxxx 0.000 A xxx}:r 0.000 + 0.000 V/C n 6 East Entrance A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C L 8 Walnut Entrance A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 10 Central Entrance D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 21 135th and Walnut B xxxxx 0.000 B xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 22 West Entrance C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C EXHIBIT, 7 PAGE ~01` J.S$ EMIR= TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 4-1 6 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----TF95WPM-_-Near_Term -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -**With -Walnut -Extended** - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume'Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Ucle (sec) : 125 Critical Vol../Cap. (X) : 0.715 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.4 ptimal Cycle: 124 Level Of Service: C pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -j---------------jj---------------ij---------------jj---------------j ontrol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include Include in. Green: 0 26 0 0 26 0 5 61 0 25 81 0 anes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 j--------------- ij--------------- jj--------------- jj---------------j olume Module: ase Vol: 225 5 175 5 10 15 15 945 200 250 1660 10 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse: 225 5 0 5 10 15 15 945 200 250 1660 10 uct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rguced Vol: 225 5 0 5 10 15 15 945 200 250 1660 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gJHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 HF Volume: 244 5 0 6 12 18 17 1056 223 253 1680 10 ICE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inal Vol.: 244 5 0 6 12 18 17 1056 223 253 1680 10 -------j---------------jj---------------jj---------------jj---------------j Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1806 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Tdjustment: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 anes: 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.17 0.33 0.50 1.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 1.99 0.01 -'final Sat.: 1502 31 1800 222 443 665 1684 2840 600 1693 3543 21 - j----- ---------jj jj--------------- jj----------------j apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.37 0.37 0.15 0.47 0.47 rit Moves: Teen/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.20 0.64 0.64 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.77 0.77 0.75 0.74 0.74 j--------------- jj--------------- jj--------------- jj---------------j evel Of Service Module: 1e1_a_y_/_V_e_h__:__ 40.1 .40.1 0.0 29.7 29.2 29.2 44.7 21.6 21.6 42.1 12.4 12.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JfrogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.85 0.85 jDel/Veh: 34.0 34.0 0.0 25.2 24.8 24.8 44.7 15.0- 15.0 42.1 10.5 10.5 ue: 9 9 0 1 1 1 1 37 37 9 41 41 EXHIBIT i PAGE GAF R.a--~... TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 5-1 02 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS. TF95WPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut Extended** Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative *******et****71c~r*1-~********irx***4.i.b*~:*xx,ck**********it*ie****,t*************st**vt*** intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Kporbach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------I---------------11---------------------------------------------~ kC M Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: nes: : 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT LnslnGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 -----~~---------------~~---------------f HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2. 0 3 2 Grade: 0% 005 0% 001 (arking/Hr: No No No No us Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 clusiveRT: Include include Include Include BORT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - Urt) Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: t) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 Case: 5 5 xxxx 7 7 7 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx _ _ _ CM Ops Saturaticn Adj Modulii In Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 larking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 rea Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 WT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 1.00 1.00 IT Adj: 0.86 0.86 xxxxx 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 1..00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FILF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 ---------11---------------11---------------~ rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: Rignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.77 0.77 0.75 0.74 0.74 rivalTyp`: 3 3 4 3 rogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.85 0.85 EXHIBIT PAGE -OF TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 6-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TTGARD ALBERTSONS TF95WPM_-Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut -Extended** - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection. #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road cle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.695 Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.4 (ptimal Cycle: 118 Level Of Service: B pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R 11--------------- ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include 11in. Green: 15 0 50 0 0 0 0 58 0 36 88. 0 anes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 I--------------- Volume Module: I ase Vol: 95 0 370 0 0 0 0 790 130 490 1410 0 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 0 370 0 0 0 0 790 130 490 1410 0 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 loduced Vol: 95 0 370 0 0 0 0 790 130 ==90 1410 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CH F Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 F Volume: 103 0 402 0 0 0 0 818 135 524. 1506 0 E Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inal Vol.. 103 0 402 0 0 0 0 818 135 524 1506 0 Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 9djustment: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1693 0 1515 0 - 0 0 0 2983 492 1693 3564 0 I------ ------------------------~I--------------- apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.31 0.42 0.00 .zCrit Moves: reen/Cycle: 0.12 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.81 0.00 qolume/Cap: 0.51 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0„59 0.59 0.90 0.52 0.00 ~ I evel Of Service Module: Relay/Veh: 40.9 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 19.2 41.7 3.2 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.62 0.62 1.00 0.59 0.62 djDel/Veh: 40.9 0.0 1.6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 11.8 41.7 1.9 0.0 eue: 3 0 10 0 0 0 0 25 25 20 18 0 EXHIBIT ~ - q C) PAGE ~OF IEEE=- TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 7-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - TIGARD ALBE'rTSONS -------TF95WPM -_-Near_Term -Weekday -PM rPeak -Hour -**With -Walnut _Extended**-_--_--- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Lpproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R• L - T - R L - T - R 11--------------- CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 ane Group : L xxxx R xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx RT RT L T xxxx LnsInGrps: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 11--------------- HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 Grade : 0 o 0°; O OS O o barking/Hr: No No No No us Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 sea Type : • < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 clusiveRT: Include include include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 11--------------- ---------------i CM Ops f (rt) and f (lt) Adj Case Module: (rt) Case: xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx xxxx =,i 5 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 0 I 11 CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: tn Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 xxxxx rade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx x>= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx arking Adj: xxxx xx..,nc i.00 xxxx xxxx xxx,V,x xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx Bus Stp Adj: -cxxx xxxx 1.00 xmxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx (eAAdj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xx= xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx T dj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx xxxxx T Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx .rxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx XXX_xx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 1.00 sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 1.00 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: tignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.90 0.52 0.00 rrivalType: 3 3 4 4 rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.62 0.62 1.00 0.59 0.62 (EXHIBIT ~ ~Y/ ~ 6 PAGE --~„OF 95WPM.IN Fri Auc 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 8-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS - -----TF95WPM-a-Near-Term -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -**With -Walnut -Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ntersection #4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street Level Of Service: D rl pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include Include Include include anes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 olume Module: Fase Vol: 55 0 35 0 0 0 0 420 65 70 550 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Tnitial Bse: 55 0 35 0 0 0 0 420 65 70 550 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 55 0 35 0 0 0 0 420 65 70 550 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 1.00 Iftnal Vol.: 61 0 39 0 0 0 0 483 75 73 575 0 ---------------l~---------------~ djusted Volume Module: rade: 0% 01 00 01 Cvcle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb : =_K xxxx xxxx xIDrEX x sx XXXX Y,rYU Xx-3 D_ C CE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 ycl/Car PCE: X>= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx• xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ).x xxxx dj Vol.. 67 0 43 0 0 0 0 483 75 80 575 0 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ Critical Gap Module: fritical T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ Capacity Module: In, nflict Vol: 1168 1168 279 1244 1205 575 575 xxxx xxxxx 557 xxxx xxxxx otent Cap.: 213 213 724 132 168 568 568 xxxx xxxxx 660 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 31.6 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxx xxxxx mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.97 xxxx 1,.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.92 xxxx xxxxx' ctual Cap.: 196 196 724 118 155 568 568 xxxx xxxxx 660 xxx:., xxxxx I--------------- 11------------------------------ 11---------------~ evel Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 129 196 681 118 155 568 568 xxxx xxxxx 579 xxxx Xxxxx tos by Move: D * A * * * * * * A vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx enused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx rxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxrx xxxx xxxxx ared LOS: * EXHIBIT C` ~ y PAGE OF ~.b 3 TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 9-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF9SWPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report---------------------- 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ir*******tt~k****•k*sYir~4*~r***~h*~Ftt********~F*dr********ir~k*****~k*st***~k*+ x*****et**:4*ie*~t**yF intersection #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue ..k**ic**************,rr;tic*,~r*i:*******,t************ac********************************:~* Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ign- Stop Sign Control:---- (-Uncontrolled- Uncontrolled- -Stop Sign--- fights: Include Include Include Include anes- 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 iase olume Module: Vol: 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t-nitial Bse: 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 9.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ornal Vol.: 6 456 0 0 255 16 3 0 11 0 0 0 djusted "volume Module: rade: 05. 01 0' 0' Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx .xxxx xxxx ~xxxx =DC xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xrxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 i.10 i.lo 1.10 1.10 Ucl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.: 7 456 0 0 255 16 3 0 12 0 0 0 ( ritical---- I Gap Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg tritical - Gp. - 5.0 - xxxx - xxxxx 5.0 xxxx - xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 11- 6.5 6.0 5.5 Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 271 xxxx xxxxx 456 xxxx xxxxx 725 725 263 744 733 456 otent Cap.: 919 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx 400 400 738 334 395 661 Used Cap.: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ctual Cap.. 919 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxs:x xxxxx 400 400 738 330 395 661 Level of Service Module: nused Cap.: 912 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xYD= 397 400 726 330 395 661 OS by Move: A Aftvement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared cap.: xxrx xxxx xxxxx Xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 631 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx nused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xx;rx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 616 xxxxx xxx.^t 0 xxxxx 11hared LOS: * * * * * * * A EXHIBIT PAGE OF q i. BMW= TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 10-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ---TF95WPM-_ Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **Wj.th Walnut Extended** - Level C` Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #6 East Entrance Level Of Service: A Ef~pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ffilRights: Include include include Include Wanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 olume Module: Wase Vol: 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 605 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 0 0 45 0 0. 0 0 440 5 0 605 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 605 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 F Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 nal. Vol.: 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 489 6 0 672 0 I--------------- djusted Volume Module: rade: -4o 0 Oo 0% o-Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0i Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 01.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 cl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trek/Cmb PC E : Y-.%= xxxx xxxx X'•= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.: 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 489 6 0 672 0 - ritical Gan Module: T Rad/P.ng:- 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg fritical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ Capacity Module: Etnflict Vol: 1164 1164 492 1217 1167 672 672 xxxx xxxxx 494 xxxx xxxxx otent Cap.: 214 214 555 165 213 504 579 xxxx xxxxx 710 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxx x 0.0 xxxx rxxxx mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.95 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Rctual Cap.. 214 214 555 157 213 504 579 xxxx xxxxx 710 xxxx xxxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 214 214 510 157 213 504 579 xxxx'xxxxx 710 xxxx xxxxx ROS by Move: * * A vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Dared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xx>= xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Rnused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Y.xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx hared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * a I IN -F95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 11-1 Rittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project.: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95WPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ntersection #8 Walnut Entrance Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include Include include .,anes : 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11--------------- plume Module: lase Vol: 95 80 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 95 80 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 95 80 0 0 120 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fial Vol.: 106 89 0 0 133 17 11 0 100 0 0 0 I---------------- djusted Volume Module: Irade. -2 Oo 00 0% Cycle/Cars: Xxxx xxxx xyxx xxxx xxxx xxyx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx yxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 lycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx yxxx xxxx _ Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxyx xxxx xxxx xxyx xxyx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.: 106 89 0 0 133 17 12 0 110 0 0 0 Critical Gan Module: T Rad/Ang:~ 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 =----1--------------- Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 150 xxxx xxxxx 89 xxxx xxxxx 336 336 142 444 344 44 lotent Cap.: 1000 xyxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx 673 673 850 524 665 1000 Used Cap.: 10.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 1.8 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 mpedance: 0.94 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.92 xxyx 1.00 1.00 Ictual Cap.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx 632 632 850 451 625 1000 I--------------- Tevel Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 894 xacxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx 620 632 740 451 625 1000 IOS by Move: A * * * * * A * A. ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - R.T LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT it-red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx,xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx mused cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * EXHIBIT PAGE'--- -OF a? 6~ , 1011 11;11ialy TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 12-1 ^-Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95WPM - Near-Term, Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut Extended** - - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative intersection #10 Central Entrance Level of Service: D *pproach: North.Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - - - R L - - - - - T - - - - - R L T - R Control Stop Sign- Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include include Include include lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 ------------(---------------1(----------------H ---------------((---------------1 olume Module: ase Vol: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 480 0 Irowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 480 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 480 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Wal Vol.: 61 0 78 0 0 0 0 417 44 139 533 0 (---------------il--------------- 11--------------- djusted Volume Module: ade: -4o Oo 00 0% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x:rxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xxXx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxXx xxxx E Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 r1cl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxY.x xxxx xxxx xxxx "j Vol.: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 417 44 153 533 0 -1 Nodul------es-: --------11----------------11---------------11----------------1 _i ti cal Gap RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg itical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx ----------i---------------11----------- 11---------------((---------------1 Capacity Module: flirt Vol: 1111 1111 439 1211 1133 533 533 xxxx xxxxx 461 xxxx xxxxx tent Cap.: 232 232 589 167 225 600 678 xxxx xxxxx 740 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 23.7 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xrxx xxxxx 20.6 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: xxxx 1.00 0.92 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx ):xxxx 0.86 xxxx: xxxxx 1[tual Cap.. 199 199 589 133 193 600 678 xxxx xxxxx 740 xxxx xxxxx 1--------------- 11--,------------ 11--------------- Level Of Service Module: used Cap.: 144 199 519 133 193 600 678 xxxx xxxxx 587 xxxx xxxxx S by Move: D * A * * * * * * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xx3:xx used Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ared LOS: * * Exwi®rr„ PAGE ~0!: 6 7 TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:19:44 Page 13-1 Rittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95WPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **With Walnut Extended** r Level Of Sex-.rice Computation Report----------------------- - 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #21 135th and Walnut Level Of Service: B Approach : North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L. - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign" Stop Sign Panes: ights: Include Include Include Include 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Initial Bse: 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Knal Vol.: 0 106 350 56 122 0 0 0 0 167 0 44 - ( Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: Oo Oo 00 0% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 lCycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx rrxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 106 350 61 122 0 0 0 0 183 0 49 Critical Ga_) Module: ,RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0•, ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft190.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 ( I 11-----7 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 122 xxxx xxxxx 456 xxxx xxxxx 678 633 122 458 458 281 Potent Cap.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx 373 455 973 575 575 723 Used. Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.9 0.0 6.8 Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.96 F ctual Cap.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx 341 433 973 547 547 723 _evel Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 1000 Y.xxx xxxxx 684 xxxx xxxxx 341 433 973 363 547 674 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * B * A vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xXxx xxxx xxxxx DO= xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ra.xxx Unused Cap.: .cxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xyxx xxxx x:-cxrx xxxx xXXX xxxY.X Shared LOS: * * EXHIBIT 9-7 5t' PAGE .OF,~,,,, ME= TF95WPM.IN Fri Aug 6,'1993 11:19:45 Page 14-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----TF95WPM-=-Near-Term -Weekday_PM -Peak -Hour -**With -Walnut -Extended** - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method pN Bas= Volume Alternative ~4ir****fe*****ie***•k*•k****ic***~r*lri******ir~r**ie*~k*********•k******ik***•A•***~t***•JF***ir*** intersection #22 West Entrance Level Of Service: C pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound iovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I1---------------~ .Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include include include Include lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2. 0 0 - - 11---------------~ "olume Module: ase Vol: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 Rrowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 535 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 W7al Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Vol.: 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 456 6 6 594 0 ~ "djusted Volume Module: Made: 0~ 0 0% o~Cycle/cars: xxxx xxxx Y-%= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxrx Ucl/Car E Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.i0 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xYxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xyxx rxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx dj Vol.: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 456 6 6 594 0 ritical l Gap Module: 11--------------- 11--------- 11---------------~ I' Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg tritic * al Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 =fx xxxxx - 11--------------- If--------------- 11---------------~ Capacity Module: Iff nflict Vol: 1058 1058 458 1067 1061 594 594 xxxx xxxxx 461 xxxx }-.xxxx otent Cap.: 252 252 575 213 251 554 634 xxxx xxxxx 740 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx xxxxx -Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx ctual Cap.: 252 252 575 213 251 554 634 xxxx xxxxx 740 xxxx xxxxx ------------------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Level Of Service Module: fused Cap.: 247 252 570 213 251 554 634 xxxx xxxxx 734 xxxx xxxxx OS by Move: C * A * * * * * * A Itn ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xx--xx sedCap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxrx xxxxx red LOS: * ® I±XHIBIJ J6 PAGE .LF950PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:24 g Page 1-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95OPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **W/O Walnut Extended** UAW Turning Movement Report plume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Erype Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 270 5 175 5 10 15 15 945 250 250 1660 10 3610 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jotal 270 5 175 5 10 15 15 945 250 250 1660 10 3610 n2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Base 95 0 420 0 0 0 0 790 130 530 1415 0 3380 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 95 0 420 0 0 0 0 790 130 530 1415 0 3380 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street ase 25 0 20 0 0 0 0 495 30 45 615 0 1230 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 25 0 20 0 0 0 0 495 30 45 615 0 1230 15 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Base 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 685 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wal. 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 685 "6 East Entrance ase 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 1170 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Total 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 1170 8 Walnut Entrance Base 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 145 -added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 145 "10 Central Entrance Iase 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 1200 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 1200 21 135th and Walnut lase 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 760 dded 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -otal 0 95 315 50 110 0 0 0 0 150 0 40 760 Tut22 West Entrance ase 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 375 5 10 515 0 915 Idded 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 al 5 0 5 0 0 0 0' 375 5 10 515 0 915 T-;'-affix System, Version 6.5 (c)'1992 DA •LicenvjWeho Ki_'ttelso® Associ PAGE ---._.-OF .J -70 i MEN= TF950PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:24 Page 2-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----TF95OPM -_-Near_Term -Weekday PM Peak Hour -**W/O Walnut Extended** Link Volume Report kolume NTB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type In Our Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Base 450 510 960 30 30 60 1210 1945 3155 1920 1125 3045 7220 Jdded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 450 510 960 30 30 60 1210 1945 3155 1920 1125 3045 7220 #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 515 660 1175 0 0 0 920 1510 2430 1945 1210 3155 6760 added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 515 660 1175 0 0 0 920 1510 2430 1945 1210 3155 6760 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street ase 45 75 120 0 0 0 525 640 1165 660 515 1175 2460 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 45 75 120 0 0 0 525 640 1165 660 515 1175 2460 #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue se 390 255 645 260 410 670 35 20 55 0 0 0 1370 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 390 255 645 260 410 670 35 20 55 0 0 0 1370 1 6 East Entrance 'Base 65 5 70 0 0 0 465 640 1105 640 525 1165 2340 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 65 5 70 0 0 0 465 640 1105 640 525 1165 2340 #8 Walnut Entrance ase 45 45 90 75 45 120 25 55 8C 0 0 0 290 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Octal 45 45 90 75 45 120 25 55 80 0 0 0 290 10 Central Entrance lase 180 210 390 0 0 0 380 525 905 640 465 1105 2400 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 180 210 390 0 0 0 380 525 905 640 465 1105 2400 121 135th and Walnut ase 410 260 670 160 135 295 0 0 0 190 365 555 1520 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Octal 410 260 670 160 135 295 0 0 0 190 365 555 1520 22 West Entrance lase 10 15 25 0 0 0 380 520 900 525 380 905 1830 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' al 10 15 25 0 0 0 330 520 900 525 380 905 1830 PAGE ---.OF _ 02 7 ~ MINES I on= TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:26 Page 3-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ------TF95OPM-_-Near_Term -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour_**W/O -Walnut -Extended** - Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C r i Scholls Road and SW 135th Aven C 17.8 0.751 C 17.8 0.751 + 0.000 D/V 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Sch B 13.2 0.721 B 13.2 0.721 + 0.000 D/V r 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C gffF 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Ave A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C U 6 East Entrance A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 8 Walnut Entrance A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 10 Central Entrance D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 22 West Entrance C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C EXHIBIT r PAGE m! I TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 4-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. -.,Project : 1050.00- - - - - MUM TIGARD ALBERTSONS _-----TF950PM-=-Near_Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **W/O Walnut Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ffl!ycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.751 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.8 cppimal Cycle: 124 Level Of Service: C roach: North, Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : •L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include include in. Green: 0 26 0 0 26 0 5 61 0 25 81 0 anes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 i 0 1 0 1 1 0 olume Module: ase Vol: 270 .5 175 5 10 15 15 945 250 250 1660 10 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 i.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 270 5 0 5 10 15 15 945 250 250 1660 10 M'duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 uced Vol: 270 5 0 5 10 15 15 945 250 250 1660 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FH F.A dj: 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 F Volume: 293 5 0 6 12 18 17 1056 279 253 1680 10 E Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0100 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 final Vol.: 293 5 0 6 12 18 17 1056 279 253 1680 10 Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 laries: 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.17 0.33 0.50 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 1.99 0.01 inal Sat.: 1507 26 1800 207 413 620 1684 2721 719 1693 3543 21 I {{---------------i{--------------- Mapacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.39 0.39 0.15 0.47 0.47 Wit Moves: een/Cycle: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.26. 0.04 0.49 0.49 0.20 0.65 0.65 Volume/Cap: 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.73 0.7,3 I ------{{---------------{{----------------i{---------------{ vel Of Service Module: lay/Veh: 54.7 54.7 0.0 30.1 26.9 26.9 44.7 22.3 22.3 41.7 12.1 12.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 •0.85 1.00 0.71 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.85 tjDel/Veh: 46.5 46.5 0.0 25.6 22.8 22.8 44.7 15.8 15.8 41.7 10.2 10.2 ue: 12 12 0 1 1 1 1 40 40 9 40 40 MUM r, UNWIT 'AGE .,®e...sOF ~TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 5-1 _ Kittelson and Associates, InC - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -`----.TF95OPM-_-Near_Term -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -**W/O -Walnut -Extended__ - Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative tsr*,t,a******,trs4'h****,t*,tJr**inx***********~,t***~c****,t**,t****,t**,t,t,r,t*!r*dr****iF**t*;ti+,o-* Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I--------------- 11---------------- HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes : 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 .Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT #LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 I--------------- 11--------------- H CM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ff~ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 Grade: 0% 0% Oo 001 Crarking/Hr: No No No No s Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 clusiveRT: Include Include Include Include WRT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 --------=---I---------------11---------------( .CM Ops f (rt ) and f (lt ) Adj Case Module : (rt) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xxs-.x 5 5 "(1t) Case: 5 5 xxxx 7 7 7 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx I--------------- 11--------------- CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: n Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FarkIng Adj xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 i.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Yea Ad3': 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 T Adj: x>= xxxx xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxx.,c 0.97 0.97 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.86 0.86 xxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 'sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' F F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.99 0.99 ------I---------------1~-------°-------~~------------°--I~---------------~ tro- g resssion Adjustment Factor Module: Signal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.73 0.73 .rrivalType: 3 3 4 3 91rogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.71 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.85 a EXHIBIT PAGE G°r TFD50PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 6-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS - TF95OPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **W/O WalnutExtended** -c Level - Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersect-on #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Ucle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.721 Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.2 E timal Cycle: 118 Level Of Service: B proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include in. Green: 10 0 50 0 0 0 0 58 0 41 88 0 anes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 I--------------- olume Module: ase Vol: 95 0 420 0 0 0 0 790 130 530 1415 0 trowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 0 420 0 0 0 0 790 130 530 1415 0 Wduced uct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vol: 95 0 420 0 0 0 0 790 130 530 1415 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UHF Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.94 1.00 HF Volume: 103 0 457 0 0 0 0 818 135 566 1512 0 -CE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inal Vol.. 103 0 457 0 0 0 0 818 135 566 1512 0 I--------------- Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 1.00 lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.00 1.72. 0.28 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1693 0 1515 0 • 0 0 0 2983 492 1693 3564 0 I---------------I~--------------- apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.33 0.42 0.00 rit Moves: seen/Cycle: 0.07 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.39 0.86 0.00 lolume/Cap: 0.85 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.85 0.50 0.00 I--------------- evel Of Service Module: lelay/Veh: 71.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0,.0 .0.0 0.0 19.2 19.2 33.6 1.8 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 rogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.62 0.62 1.00 0.57 0.62 IdjDel/Veh: 71.0 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 11.8 33.6 1.0 0.0 ue: 5 0 13 0 0 0 0 25 25 20 13 0 ~•*t•rY*Rrek***Irtlrt•k*ie~ir•k*~s9ftt•k*•ktF,tsk*k~e*Y**~e•k**dr~••k*~•iric*tir*st~•*•*sk****ir•k•k*zttlr**irF•k*sh*irt - _ 1 a ~ EXHIBIT y PAGE -OF ~~S TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 7-1 - Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95OPM - Near-Term-Weekday PM Peak Hour **W/O Walnut Extended**--------- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound vement : L - T - R L T - R L- - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------•-------1 LMes: Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization, Module: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 Lane Group: L xxxx R xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx RT RT L T xxxx nsInGrps : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 I--------------- 11---------------I1--------------- 11---------------i M Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ne Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 lade: Oo Oo Oo 0o _ Parking/Hr: No No No No s Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Ilea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 IgElusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Prtct: 0 0 0 0 I--------------- 11---------------II--------------- 11----------------I HCM Ops f (rt ) and f (lt ) Adj Case Module : • rt ) Case: x.~cxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx xxxx xrxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------11---------------II---------------I1---------------1 F" M Ops Saturation Adj Module: T Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 xxxxx IFr de Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx king Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 rxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxxx Area Adj: 1.00 xr..xx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj: • 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 1.00 Uar Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_1 Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.84 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 1.00 1 I 11 11 1) gresssion Adjustment Factor Module: Snal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.85 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.85 0.50 0.00 AmirivalType: 3 3 4 4 Pt gAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.62 0.62 1.00 0.57 0.62 r - EXHIBIT PAGE -7 TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 8-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF950PM - Near-Term WeekdayPM -Peak Hour **W/O Walnut -Extended**°--______ - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection r4 Scholls Ferry Road and Wal::ut Street Level Of Service: D pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include Include Include Include lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 ((---------------(i---------------~ olume Module: ase Vol: 25 0 20 0 0 0 0 495 30 45 615 0 trowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Tnitial Bse: 25 0 20 0 0 0 0 495 30 45 615 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 25 0 20 0 0 0 0 495 30 45 615 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 1.00 19al Vol.: 28 0 22 0 0 0 0 569 34 47 643 0 djusted Volume Module: rade: Oo 0% 0o 0% Cycle/Cars: XXxX xxxx Xxxx XXXX xxxx XY.XX xxxx XXXX Truck/Comb: x~ax xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xrxx xxxx W&C, Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Wcl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 'xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE:: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx j Vol.. 31 0 24 0 0 0 0 569 34 52 643 0 11--------------- ritical Gap Module: RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 4-t/90.0 deg itical Gp: 6.0 .6.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx ----------(---------------(1---------------((---------------((---------------( Capacity Module: On-flict Vol: 1276 1276 302 1315 1293 643 643 xxxx xxxxx 603 xxxx xxxxx tent Cap.: 180 180 703 121 151 524 524 xxxx xxxxx 628 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 17.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 8".2 xxxx xxxxx T pedance: xxxx 1.00 0.98 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx tual Cap.. 171 171 703 113 143 524 524 xxxx xxxxx 628 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: used Cap.: 140 171 679 113 143 524 524 xxxx xxxxx 576 3r,= xxxxx FS by Move: D * A * * . * * * * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT-- LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx fared sed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx -xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx rxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS : * * * * * * * ! EXHIBIT e.:~.. j~-•- PAGE r.. ~OF ~7~ TF95OPM.I!.* Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 9-1 & Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS - TF95OPM - Near-Term Weekday PM Peak Hour **W/O Walnut Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignaiized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection.#5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Level Of Service: A pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 'ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R' Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include Include include lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 - - olume Module: ase Vol: 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initial Bse: 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 5 385 0 0 245 15 25 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FRK'F Adj: 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 9.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mal Vol.: 6 456 0 0 255 16 3 0 11 0 0 0 I--------------- djusted Volume Module: 0' rade: 0% 0% 0% Oo Cycle/Cars: Xxxx xxxx Xxxx xxxx XXXx XXXX XXXX XXXX Truck/Comb: xXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXxx X%=. XXxx xxxx CE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 lycl/Car PCE: DO= XXXx xxxx xXXx Xxxx Xxxx xxxx XXXX Trck/Cmb PCE: X>= X.= xxxX XxXX Xxxx XXXX XxxX :=x dj Vol.: 7 456 0 0 255 16 3 0 12 0 0 0 ritical Gat Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical Gp. 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 - ---------------11---------------H Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 271 xxxx xxxxx 456 xxxx xxxxx 725 725 263 744 733 456 otent Cap.: 919 xxxx xxxxx 74-5 xxxx xxxxx 400 400 738 334 395 661 Used Cap.: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 mpedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 9 ctual Cap.: 919 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx 400 400 738 330 395 661 - -I--------------- Level Of Service Module: nused Cap.: 912 xxxx xxxxx 745 xxxx xxxxx 397 400 726 330 395 661 ROS by Move: A * ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxx xxxx 631 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx nosed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 616 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx hared LOS : * * * * A ~(J-7* ~HIGIT PAGE Now TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 10-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - - b TIG.ARD ALBERTSONS ------TF95OPM -_-Near`Term Weekday -PM Peak Hour **W/O Walnut Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report - 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method - Base Volume Alternative * s4 * * * * * tt * * * * * * is * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A• * * * * 7k 7k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Intersection #6 East Entrance Level Of Service: F_ E proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound vement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ( Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include Include Include include lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 ( I lume Module: Wase Vol: 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 itial Bse: 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Educed Vol: 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 460 5 0 640 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 31al Vol.: 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 511 6 0 711 0 ( justed Volume Module: ade: -4% 01 0% 0% 1.[Cycle/Cars: DO= xxxx xxxx x X_% x__X , xxxx xxxx xxxY, % Truck/Comb : xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx rxxx x.}-xx xxxx xxxx gffitE Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 ` c 1 / Car P CE : xxxx xxx.•x xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: Xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xYxx ' j Vol.. 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 511 6 0 711 0 ritical - Gap Module: : R Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg itical Gp: 6.0 6.0 '6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx - Capacity Module: flict Vol: 1225 1225 514 1300 1228 711 711 xx~cx xxxxx 517 xxxx xxxxx tent Cap.: 193 193 539 150 192 477 553 xxxx xxxxx 692 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: xxxx 1.00 0.92 7----,x 1.00 1.00 1. 0 0• xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx tual Cap.: 193 193 539 139 192 477 553 xxxx xxxxx 692 xxYx xxxxx ( Level Of Service Module: used Cap.: 193 193 474 139 192 477 553 xxxx xxxxx 692 xxxx xxxxx IS by Move: * * A N ment: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Yxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Aused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ared LOS: * * EXH18ff TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:2.7 Page 11-1 - Y,ittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95OPM - Near-Term Weekday-PM-Peak Hour **W/O Walnut-Extended**--------- Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #8 Walnut Entrance Level Of Service: A *•**ir*'**'d'*'k~k'k**'*ie**•***ie**~Ir~i•*****'kih**ir~1•ir~l•****~h*•*•k•k.Yir•k•**tk'k**'**tk***ik•k********~h*ilrir*Yr•k pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - - - T - R -11- L - T - R L - T - R --------11--------------------11---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include Include Include lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I olume Module: ase Vol: 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 Irowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 20 25 0 0 40 35 20 0 5 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Oral Vol.: 22 28 0 0 44 39 22 0 6 0 0 0 ------------I---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I djusted Volume Module: rade: -2a 0% 0~ 0% Cycle/Cars : xxxx xYxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx rxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xrxx yxxx xxxx xxrx xxxx XXY-X xxxx E Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 tcl/Car PCE: xxxx x,cxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx yx_Xx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx Y-,)= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx °j Vol.: 22 28 0 0 44 39 24 0 6 0 0 0 - -I----------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I =itical Gap Module: RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft190.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg itical Gp. 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 ----------I---------------11---------------11---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Fflict Vol: 83 xxxx xxxxx 28 xxxx xxxxx 114 114 64 139 133 14 tent Can.: 1000 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx 883 883 929 781 860 1000 ~ Used Cap.: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 2.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 ,0.0 0.0 pedance: 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xx.,cx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 v0 tual Cap.. 1000 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx xxxxx 872 872 929 771 849 1000 -I---------------11---------------(I-----------------11---------------I Level Of Service Nodule: Oh-used Cap.: 978 xxxx xxxxx 1000 xxxx vxxxx 847 872 923 771 849 1000 S by Move: A * * * * * A * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x_~cx_x x -xxx fared sed cap.: xrxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx rx?_xx atY~cx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS : * * * * * * * * * * 0 ~ * ~,XHInIT '_PAAE ---®F TF95OPM.IN, Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:27 Page 12-1 Kittelson and Associates, I..=. - .roject # 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS -----TF95OPM-_-Near_Term -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour -**W/O -Walnut -Extended** Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #10 Central Entrance Level Of Service: D pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include Include Include Include 11anes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 olume Module: ase Vol: 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,initial Bse: 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E2educed Vol: 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 340 40 170 470 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 R F Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 nal Vol.: 61 0 139 0 0 0 0 378 44 189 522 0 -I------------------------------------------------------------~ tdjusted Volume Module: rade: -40 0o 01 00 Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: xxxx xxrx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 140 1.00 ycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ffiff~dj Vol.. 55 0 125 0 0 0 0 378 44 208 522 0 11--------------- 11--------------- Critical Gap Nodule: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg tritical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx ~ Capacity Module:------------11--------------- 11--------------- nflict Vol: 1111 13.11 400 1272 1133 522 522 xxxx xxxxx 422 xxxcc xxxxx 11otent Cap.: 232 232 620 153 225 610 687 xxxx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx % Used Cad?.: 23.7 0.0 20.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 26.7 xxxx xxxxx mpedance: xxxx 1.00 0.86 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.81 xxxx xxY.xx ctual Cap.: 187 187 620 106 181 610 687 xxxx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx I Level Of Service Module: jEnused Cap.: 132 187 495 106 181 610 687 xxxx xxxxx 570 xxrx xxxxx OS by Move: D * A * * * * * * A IR vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxrx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xx:-.x xxxx xxxxx nused Cap.: xxxx xxrx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx Xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx hared LOS: * * 111 1 11 111111 11 TF95OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 11:40:28 Pane 13-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS TF95OPM - Near-Term WeekdayPMPeak -Hour **W/O Walnut -Extended_•*--------_ - Level - r of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative 6 ®k+ti**#***,t,t***************,t*******,t*,t**st********,t*****SF****,t********************'.Intersection #22 West Entrance Level Of Service: C pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - ---------------i ontrol: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ights: Include Include Include Include apes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 olume Module: , ase Vol: 5_ 0 5 0 0 0 0 375 5 10 515 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 375 5 10 515 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 375 5 10 515 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 oral Vol.: 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 417 6 11 572 0 { djusted volume Module: rade : -4 0 01 O P-. 0-1. T Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck/Comb: x.'rxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxaOx ".=.x xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Loycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxyx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx X.> xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx rxxx j Vol.. 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 417 6 12 572 0 Critical Gap Nodule: FX Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg itical Gp: 6.0 6..0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx i{--------------- Capacity Module: wo-flict Vol: 1003 1003 419 1011 1006 572 572 xxxx xxxxx 422 xxxx xxxxx tent Cap.: 269 269 604 232 268 569 649 xxxx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 1.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 1.6 xxxx xxxxx edance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxxx ptual l Cap.. 267 267 604 229 266 569 649 xxxx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: q used Cap.: 262 267 599 225 266 569 649 xxxx xrx3oc 766 xxxx xxxxx S by Move: C * A * * * * * * A ement: LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx fared sed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS: * * WNW PAGE _--~OF p 7 ~r m a.., a SME ME 0 MEME mom Emmm ection 7 Capacity calculation KN<, 7 Worksheets 2010 Conditions EY.HIBrr OF PAGE i MIN" 201©PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:01 Page 1-1 _ Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00______________ TIGARD ALBERTSONS 2010PM - 2010 weekday PM Peak Hour ----------------------------Turning-Movement-Report olunte Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbcund Total e Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue r3ase 30 10 80 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 2680 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 30 10 80 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 2680 n2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Base 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 2585 dded• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 total 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 2585 -4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street ase 60 280 50 70 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 1965 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 60 280 50 70 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 1965 .,5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue Base 20 535 0 0 460 50 30 0 25 0 0 0 1120 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11tal 20 535 0 0 460 50 30 0 25 0 0 0 1120 6 East Entrance ase 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 600 0 1090 Hdded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 600 0 1090 8 Walnut Entrance Base 95 380 0 0 500 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 1090 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 95 380 0 0 500 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 1090 "-'10 Central Entrance ase 55 0 .70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 475 0 1140 idded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 475 0 1140 1121 135th and Walnut Base 0 440 125 125 440 0 0 0 0 70 0 55 1255 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lotal 0 440 125 125 440 0 0 0 0 70 0 55 1255 7#22 West Entrance ase 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 530 0 960 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 0 0 0 0 0 al 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 530 0 960 Traffix System Versi.orl 6.5 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to I~ittelson Associ EXHIBIT J $3 PACE-OF 11141 l~:11 blasm 2010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:02 Page: 2-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.C3 TIGARD AL,BERTSONS 201OPM - 2010 Weekday PM Peak Hour ------------------------------Link Volume-Report-------------------------------- olume NB Link SB Link EB Link WB Link Total Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Volume t i Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue ase 120 270 390 30 30 60 830 1495 2325 1700 885 2585 5360 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05- otal 120 270 390 30 30 60 830 1495 2325 1700 685 2585 5360 #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road ase 335 435 770 110 110 220 645 1175 1820 1495 865 2360 5170 dded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lotal 335 435 770 110 110 220 645 1175 1820 1495 865 2360 5170 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street lase 390 515 905 600 455 1055 485 600 1085 490 395 885 3930 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 otal 390 515 905 600 455 17055 485 600 1085 490 395 885 3930 #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue WE 555 485 1040 510 565 1075 55 70 125 0 0 0 2240 ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 555 485 104C 510 565 1075 55 70 125 0 0 0 2240 East Entrance Itse 45 5 50 0 0 0 445 600 1045 600 485 1085 2180 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tal 45 5 50 0 0 0 445 600 1045 600 485 1085 2180 Walnut Entrance se 475 590 10G5 515 390 905 100 110 210 0 0 0 2180 ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 tall l 475 590 1065 515 390 905 100 110 210 0 0 0 2180 0 Central Entrance Use 125 165 290 0 0 0 415 530 945 600 445 1045 2280 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 'T' tal 125 165 290 0 0 0 415 530 945 600 445 1045 2280 Al 135th and Walnut Base 565 510 3.075 565 495 1060 0 0 0 125 250 375 2510 ded 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ital 565 510 1075 565 495 1060 0 0 0 125 250 375 2510 4L West Entrance e 10 10 20 0 0 0 415 535 950 535 415 950 1920 A d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 10 10 20 0 0 0 415 535 950 535 415 950 1920 EXHIBIT J & y RAGE i 2010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:04 Page 3-1 - Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 2010PM - 2010 Weekday PM Peak-Hour V Impact Analysis Report Level of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C 1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Aven B 12.1 0.487 B 12.1 0.487 + 0.000 D/V 2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Sch B 12.4 0.486 B 12.4 0.486 + 0.000 D/V 4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut C 17.0 0.677 C 17.0 0.677 + 0.000 D/V 5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Ave C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C r 6 East Entrance A x.----x 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 8 Walnut Entrance D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 10 Central Entrance D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 21 135th and Walnut D e..-cyoxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 2 West. Entrance C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C EXHIBIT 5 PAGE ,4F . OlOPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 4-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ------------------------_10 --Weekday PM - Peak Hour 2010-- 2 Level Of'Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue arycle (sec): 125 Critical Val./Cap. (X): 0.487 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.1 optimal Cycle: 124 Level of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Ignore Include Include Include in. Green: 0 26 0 0 26 0 5 61 0 25 81 0 anes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 olume Module: ase Vol: 30 10 80 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 0-rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 30 10 0 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 uct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 30 10 0 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1qNHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HF Volume: 30 10 0 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 RLCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MWMLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I in al Vol.. 30 10 0 5 10 15 10 800 20 240 1450 10 Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.17 0.33 0.50 1.00 1.'95 0.05 '1.00 1.99 0.01 "final Sat.: 1230 410 1800 249 498 747 1684 3460 86 1693 3540 24 -1=-------------- I1--------------- 11---------------~ apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.14 0.41 0.41 rit Moves: Kreen/Cycle: 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.49 0.49 0.20 0.66 0.66 Volume/Cap: 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.47 0.47 0.70 0.62 0.62 -1--------------- (1-------------- -H evel Of Service Module: 30.5 30.5 0. 0 30.4 30.4 30.4 44.1 16.0 16.0 39.5 9.9 9.9 1e1-a-y--/V-e-h--:-- Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.56 0.56 1.00 0.85 0.85 ldiDel/Veh: 26.0 26.0 0.0 25.8 25.8 25.8 44.1 9.0 9.0 39.5 8.4 8.4 ue: 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 19 19 8 30 30 EXHISIT PAGE -OF 1:! 11 1 1 1112 111 gum 201OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 5-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 201OPM - 2010 Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Scholls Road and SW 135th Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 11--------------- tanes: CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT LnsT-nGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 - I --------11---------------------------------------------~ HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 trade: 00 0•°s 00 00 Parking/Hr: No No No No us Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 m&xclusiveRT: Include Include include include T Prtct: 0 0 0 0 -I---------------11- HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: rt) Case: xxxx xxxx xxxx 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 t(lt) Case: 5 5 xxxx 7 7 7 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx ---------------11 ---------------I CM Ops Saturation Adj Module: n Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 11arking ade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 s Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: xxxx xxxx rxxxx 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxyx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adj: •0.92 0.92 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 xxxx xxxx.`t 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.99 CF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Adj: 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.99 11--------------- 11---------------{ ogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: anal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.47 0.47 0.70 0.62 0.62 rivalType: 3 3 4 3 ogAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.56 0.56 1.00 0.85 0.85 FOIQ. r l 7 PAGE -®®E ...o..~. f i 2010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 6-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - - TIGARD ALBERTSONS ------------------------------2010 -Weekday -PM -Peak -Hour - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ,Intersection 7#2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.486 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.4 Optimal Cycle: 125 Level Of Service: B **tir******!: ~ ~ ~:'.:rtitic**R*irirx***************k************************k*************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Ovl Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 0 69 0 15 0 5 44 .0 49 88 0 Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Moduli:--------------11 ase Vol: 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 ®Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FHF Volume: 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _YTLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 15 75 245 5 95 10 20 615 10 330 1150 15 Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.94 0.99 9.84 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 1.0& 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.97 0.03 Final Sat.: 1693 1782 1515 1710 1612 170 1684 3489 57 1693 3518 46 -I apacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat:. 0.01 0.04 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.33 0.33 Writ Moves: reen/Cycle: 0.04 0.16 0.55 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.39 0.71 0.71 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.27 0.30 1.04 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.46 I--------------- evel Of Service Module: k-elay/Veh: 44.4 35.5 11.7 403 40.8 40.8 45.0 24.3 24.3 22.3 6.2 6.2 el ay Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JroqAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.57 0.57 1.00 0.56 0.56 djDel/Veh: 44.4 30.2 9.9 403 34.7 34.7 45.0 14.0 14.0 22.3 3.5 3.5 AM. emmmeue: 1 2 5 1 4 4 1 17 17 9 18 18 ' EXHIBIT 1 ff PAGE o._,_OF 2010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 7-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 201OPM-_-2010-Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative *~.;,..~.±.*ay,~*s*.a.a.i4f.*±kt4*************Y*****ie*************************************** Intersection #2 Old Scholls Ferry Road and Scholls Ferry Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T- R L- T- R L T- R L- T- R F---w;P-;- --(---------------11- -----11---------------11---------------I Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes : 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ,1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: L T R L RT ~RT L RT RT L RT RT 1,-LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 I(- 1 1 1 1 2 - - - 2 11--- 1 - - 2 2 -1----------Ii------I HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Tane width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 0 3 2 Grade: 0% 0o 0% 0% y kurking/Hr: No No No No s Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ea Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 clusiveRT: Include Include Include Include WRT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - -I --11---------------11---------------11---------------1 CM Ops f (rt) and f (lt.) Adj Case Module: (rt) Case: xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 xxxx 5 5 (1t) Case: I xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx. I 11 1 CM ODs Saturation Adj Module: in Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 arking Adj: xxxx xx.-cx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 us Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 CT ea Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adj:. 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.98 0..94 0.99 0.99 Sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ELF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.99 -I---------------11- --------11---------------11---------------1 rogresssion Adjustment Factor Module: 4ig-n-a-1--T-y-p-e--: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.27 0.30 1.04 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.46 rivalType: 3 3 4 4 lrrogAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.57 0.57 1.00 0.56 0.56 EXHIBIT PAGE Q10PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 8-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.,00 - TIGARD ALBERTSONS d 2010 Weekday PM Peak Hour Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative intersection #4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut` Street cle (sec) 62 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.677 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.0 k~!imal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Fin. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 apes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 "olume Module: ase Vol: 60 280 50 70 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 280 50 70 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 60 280 50 70 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RHF Volume: 60 280 50 10 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 CE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 LF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 inal Vol.: 60 280 59 70 355 175 120 275 90 70 365 55 Saturation Flow Module: at/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 djustment: 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.97 0.97 Lanes: 1.00 0.85 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.87 0.13 inal Sat.: 1693 1482 265 1693 1782 1515 1693 1289 422 1693 1518 229 apacity Analysis Module:------------------ Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.20 0.12 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.24 0.24 rit Moves: Breen/Cycle: 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.29 0.40 0.10 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.68 0.29 0.68 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.68 0.68 - evel of Service Module: elay/Veh: 34.1 17.2 17.2 31.3 17.1 9.7 27.0 12.1 12.1 24.9 15.0 15.0 Delay Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rogAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1djDel/Veh: 34.1 17.2 17.2 31.3 17.1 9.7 27.0 12.1 12.1 24.9 15.0 15.0 eue: 1 5 5' 2 6 2 2 5 5 1 7 7 Ex"HIBUT PAGE ___OF 2010rv.IN Fri Aug 6, 1593 12:42:05 Page 9-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 - - TIGARD ALBERTSONS ----2ClOP??---2010-Weekday-PM-Peak-Hour----------------------------- Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM OperationE Method Base Volume Alternative Inters_:tion #4 Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street *$'***'11"'kR~**7k *]k 9f 'X 11r]4t4**7k*****9t*~'**1Y'*74*'******!Y'lA'1k*9k 7F*iC'*:4roh'k*'k 'h sF*#******:t***tF *'***tF 'k Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - F. -I- H CM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization -Module: II Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 7. 0 0 1 0 Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L RT RT L RT RT LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F-1 ----I---------------11- HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Hev Veh: 2 2 2 2 Grade: 0% 01 0. 00 arking/Hr: No No No No LS Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 rea a Type : < < < < < < < < < < < c < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Craft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 W clusiveRT: Include Include Include Include RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - - 11---------------~I--------------- CM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: (rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 xxrx 5 5 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Ops Saturation Adj Module !---------------------------------------------t-nCM Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .arking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 'xxxx 1.00 1.00 rea Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.96 ...0.96 xxxx 0.98 0.98 T Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.97 0.97 ff4LF sr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.97 0.97 ---------------11- --------11---------------11---------------~ rogresssion Adjustment Factor Nodule: ignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < c Fixed Time > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.68 0.29 0.68 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.68 0.68 rrivalType: 3 3 3 3 trogAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 /';L f EXHIBIT - PAGE ----OF a4! 2010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 10-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 4: 1050.00 °iIGARD ALBERTSONS 2010PM - 2010 Weekday PM Peak Hour AIM Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method MAN Base Volume Alternative Intersection #5 Walnut Street and SW 135th Avenue F******************************************************************************* Level Of Service: C pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 0-vement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------f~--------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign fights: Include Include Include Include tanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 olume Module: ase Vol: 20 535 0 0 460 50 30 0 25 0 0 0 rowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 20 535 0 0 460 50 30 0 25 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 20 535 0 0 460 50 30 0 25 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l" Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Wal Vol.: 20 535 0 0 460 50 30 0 25 0 0 0 djusted Volume Module: 0% Oo rade: 0% 001 oCycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx Truck/Comb: x--xx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1ycl/Car_ PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE : xxxx axxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xXxx xxxx XXXx dj Vol.: 22 535 0 0 460 50 33 0 28 0 0 0 - - ritical Gap Module: 11 ir-itical Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg Gp: 5.0 =xx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---•------------~ Capacity Module: flirt Vol: 510 xxxx xxxxx 535 xxxx xxxxx 1040 1040 485 1090 1065 535 tent Cap.: 697 xxxx xxxxx 677 xxxx xxxxx 258 258 559 204 249 599 Used Cap.: 3.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 Do= xxxxx 12.8 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tm-oedance: 0.98 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.97 xxxx 1.00 1.00 tual Cap.. 697 xxxx xxxxx 677 xxxx xxxxx 253 253 559 194 244 599 I--------------- ---------------I Level Of Service Module: used Cap.: 675 xxxx xx~xx 677 xxxx xxxxx 220 253 532 194 244 599 63S by Move: A * mfiftrement: LT - LTR - RT LT - tTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 337 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx IMF, used Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 276 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx tared LOS: * * * * * * * C EXHIBIT _ PAGE -OF a O10PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 11-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS --------------------------9---2010-Weekday-PM-Peak-Hour------------------------ 201 - Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #6 East Entrance Level Of Service: pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound F ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R 11--------------- ontrol:. Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ,ights: Include Include Include Include Mianes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 olume Module: ase Vol: 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 600 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 tnitial Bse: 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 600 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .Reduced Vol: 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 440 5 0 600 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 C.90 1.00 11nal Vol.: 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 489 6 0 667 0 11---------------~ adjusted Volume Module: rade: -40 0% O; 00k xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx W Cycle/Cars: xxxx :=-x >D= >D= Truck/Comb: Do= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1•.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 lycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx X=X xxxx DO= xxxx xxxx xxxx F dj Vol.. 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 489 6 0 667 0 II---------------~ Critical Gap Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg i r itical Gp: 6..0 6`.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 11---------------- 11--------------- 11---------------~ Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 1158 1158 492 1211 1161 667 667 xxxx xxxxx 494 xxxx xx;-= lotent Cap.: 217 217 555 167 216 508 583 xxxx xxxxx 710 xxxx xxxxx Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: xxxx 1.00 0.95 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx ctual Cap.: 217 217 555 159 216 508 583 xxxx xxxxx 710 xxxx xxxxx I--------------- evl of Service Module: inu: e d Cap.: 217 217 510 159 216 508 583 xxxx xxxxx 710 xxxx xxxxx OS by Move: * * A ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT jff,ared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x-x.% xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx nused'Cap • xx= __1VLX xxxxx XXXX XxYx xxxxx 5tut~r. .L.sa.~ M~un Ji 3Cx5CX xx5CX7C XxxX x.n~n mat 11hared LOS : * * * * * * EXHIBIT - PAGE OF 2010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:0- Page 12-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIG;aD ALBERTSONS 2010PM - 2010 Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Sert71ce Computat:-n Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative IC 'A'~'*'****1~'~' *~'!A'7I'SF'~17C *'((*~''k '**'****~'**'~'k ***7X 7t[1C 1CX* Sri ~i Sit 'w`'SY 'K SY*~S4 'n SZ S. **'n T. r *y'[ w *K' n w Intersection #8 Walnut Entrance Level of Service: D glApproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound 'West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R ---------------f;---------- 11--------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ights: Include Include Include Include tanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 •----I--------------- 11--.------------- 11--------------- Volume Module: ase Vol: 95 380 0 0 500 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 Growth Adj: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 95 380 0 0 500 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 95 380 0 0 500 15 10 0 90 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 afnal Vol.: 106 422 0 0 556 17 11 0 100 0 0 0 I----_-------------------------- 11---------------~ djusted Volume Module: -rade: -20 0% Oo 0% Cycle/Cars : x'cx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx =1-1-x xxxx =x Truck/Comb: :)=x xyyx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 ycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx hxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xyxx dj Vol.. 106 422 0 0 556 17 12 0 110 0 0 0 - -I------------------------------11------------------------------~ Critical Gap Module: RT Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/.90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 11ritical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 -----------I---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 572 xxxx xxxxx 422 xxxx x=-Dc 1092 1092 564 1200 1100 211 totent Cap.: 649 xr-xx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx 238 238 500 170 235 879 Used Cap.: 16.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.1 0.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tmpedance: 0.89 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.84 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Fctual Cap.: 649 xxxx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx 212 212 500 128 209 879 I--------------- Level Of Service Module: [nused Cap.: 544 xxxx xxxxx 778 xxxx xxxxx 200 212 390 12€3 209 879 OS by Move: A * * * * * D t B vement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT _ared Cap.:'xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx >0= xxxx xxxxx >1 . xxxx xxxxx nused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx hared LOS: * * EXHIBIT 1 PAGE ~OF a~~ 010PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:05 Page 13-- Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project: 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ---------------------2010-----2010-Weekday----Peak-Hour------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative y}*~ ~~*~±±~•+i±**±±±t4****+±i±d•+*++***************ir it is******ekrt**r***k sc************* Intersection #10 Central Entrance Level Of Service: D proach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound vement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ontrol: Stop - Sign--- ign- - - 11--- Stop - Sign Uncontrolled -11-- Uncontrolle-d- ghts: Include Include Include include nes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Klume Module: se Vol: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 475 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 zitial Bse: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 475 0 duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duced Vol: 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 375 40 125 475 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 Mal Vol.: 61 0 78 0 0 0 0 417 44 139 528 0 I--------------- justed Volume Module: ffl- ade: -4% 0% 0% 0~ Cycle/Cars: Xxxx xxxx Xxxx >D Xxxx XxXX rxxx Xxxx % Truck/Comb : xxxx >D= xrxx xxxx X= XX= xxxx X.>= E Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.1.0 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 tcl'/Car PCE: xxxx Do= xxxx Xxxx xxxx xxXX rxxx X%= Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx Xxxx X= Xxxx xxxx Xxxx j Vol.. 55 0 70 0 0 0 0 417 44 153 528 0 r 1--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg litical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxx= I--------------- Capacity Module: flirt Vol: 1106 1106 439 1206 1128 528 528 xxxx xxxxx 461 xxxx xxxxx tent Cap.: 233 233 589 168 227 605 683 xxxx xxxxx 740 xxxx Y.3:XxJX Used Cap.: 23.6 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 20.6 xxxx xxxxx pedance: xxxx 1.00 0.92 'xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.86 xxxx xxxxx tual Cap.: 201 201 589 134 195 605 683 xxxx xxxxx 740 xx_--cx xxxxx -IeS vel Of Service Module: used Cap.: 146 201 519 134 195 605 683 xxxx xxxxx 587 xxxx xxxxx by Move: D * A * * * * * * A * . * ement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR RT red Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx fhuar,ed sed Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx,°~c xxxx xxxxx LOS EXHIBIT ~4 PAGE ~~~F' gil 1;10 PM.IN Fri Aug 6, 1993 12:42:06 Page 14-1 Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ---------2010PM---2010-Weekday -PM-Peak -~~our------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 F.CM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #21 135th and Walnut Level of Service: D pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1--------------- 11--------------- ---------------i ontrol: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign fights: Include Include Include Include Mianes : 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 17 11 11 11 I olume Module: [Base Vol: 0 440 125 125 440 0 0 0 0 70 0 55 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 0 440- 125 125 440 0 0 0 0 70 0 55 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 0 440 125 125 440 0 0 0 0 70 0 55 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nal Vol.: 0 440 125 125 440 0 0 0 0 70 0 55 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 djusted Volume Module: rade: Oo 0% Q% 0% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xrxx xxxx xxxx xxxx >11= xxxx xxxx Cc ° Truck/Comb : xxxx x x x x X-'>= 20= >D= xxxx :r}:x xX-.xx E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.1G 1.10 1.10 cl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE : XD= xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 7-CMx 11 dj Vol.: 0 440 125 138 440 0 0 0 0 77 0 61 1---------------il--------------- 11--------------- 11-------- -------1 Critical Gap Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg ritical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 11 11 1 Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 440 xxxx xxxxx 565 xxxx xxxxx 1185 1130 440 1068 1068 503 lotent Cap.: 760 xxxx xxxxx 655 xxxx xxxxx 173 226 672 248 248 548 Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 21.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 11.0 mpedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.93 ctual Cap.: 760 xxxx xxxxx 655 xxxx xxxxx 137 193 672 211 211 548 I 1 evl Of Service Module: inu: e d Cap.: 760 xxxx xxxxxx 517 xxxx xxxxx 137 193 672 134 211 488 OS by Move: * * * A * * * * * D * A ement : LT - LTR - RT LT - .LTR - RT LT LTR. - RT LT - Z;TR - RT ared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ?used Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx rxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * NNW 056 PAGE 201OPM.IN Fri Aug 6, --.903'12:42:06 Page 15-1 e - ' - Kittelson and Associates, Inc. - Project 1050.00 TIGARD ALBERTSONS 2010 Weekday P Peak Hour Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative ~['A'd'**'kSC:s4'it'**'*'Af*'IC'1e 71r 1k]F***'k'*+tC St******'klk th lk*aair K,;§lT'it sw''IliC'*lk'*'****'k*'**'3r*tF *7k 74 *'*iC****~t****7k*tk 1F Intersection n22 West Entrance Level Of Service: C i[74 tk**!Y**'*'**~[*7E'**lk*7k 3f**'k***t4'k**'x***dt*7k iC r'R'*'A'***~'**71'******`kac*'k *'*SF '*'*IC***tk**at *'*1Y***** pproach: North Bound South Bound East Bound' West Bound ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------1---------------11---------------11- -Ii---------------1 Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled DE-anes ights: Include Include Include Include : 1 0 0 0- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 olume Module: Fase Vol: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 530 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 nitial Bse: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 530 0 educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 educed Vol: 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 410 5 5 530 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 G F Adj: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.00 nal Vol.: 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 456 6 6 589 0 I 11 1 djusted Volume Module: wade: -4% 0% 0% 00 Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx XY= xxxx xxxx xxxx x% Truck/Comb: xxxx DO= xrxx xxxx x-xxx xxxx xxrx xxxx CE Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 tycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx x3-xx xxxx xxxx xrxx :>=x xxxx Trck/Cmb PCE : xxxx xx}-.x rxxx xxxx xxxx =:x xxxx xxxx dj Vol.. 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 456 6 6 589 0 1---------------11---------------il---------------11---------------I Critical Ga_-o Module: T Rad/Ang: 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg 20.0 ft/90.0 deg fritical Gp: 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx 3::..= ------------i-----=---------11--------------- 11--------------- 11-----.----------1 Capacity Module: nflict Vol: 1053 1053 458 1061 1056 589 589 xxxx xxxxx 461 xxxx xxxxx lotent Cap.: 254- 254 575 216 253 558 638 xxxx rxxxx 740 x x x x xxxxcc Used Cap.: 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx xxxxx -mpedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Ictual Cap.: 254 254 575 216 253 558 638 xrxx xxxxx 740 xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------I1---------------I1---------------11---------------I Level Of Service Module: . nused Cap.: 249 254 570 216 253 558 638 rxxx xxxxx 734 xxxx xxxxx ROS by Move: C * A * * * * * * A vement:- LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ared Cap xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxrx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xrxx xY.xx xxx.Yx fnused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx >-xxx xxrx xxxx ared LOS : * * * * * * * * * r 7 EXHIBIT ; PAGE i F f 4r c i MEN Section 8 [Arms Signal 'and Left-Turn Pocket KXN Warrant Spreadsheet EXHIEiT PAGE o ~J 4 c~ 6F Oil Project: Tiagrd Mbertsons lie: _H_:\PR0JFH.E\105 0\10SF W-S W. W Q 1 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET p~ GENERAL INFORMATION INTERSECTION : Wainut/Scholls Ferry CONDITIONS : 2010 PM Peak NUMBER OF LANES FOR MOVING TRAFFIC MAJOR APP = 1 MINOR APP - 1 VOLUMES ARE 8TH HIGHEST HOUR ? NO (YES OR NO FOR PH COUNTS) FACTOR = 0.70 (0.6 to 0.8 Acceptable Range) IS THE POPULATION < 10,000 ORSPEED > 40 ? NO (CONSIDERED RURAL) FACTOR REQUIRED ACTUAL VOLUMES 8TH HIGHEST HOUR # LANES # LANES MAJOR MINOR MAJOR MINOR MAJOR MINOR WARR MAJOR MINOR VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOL UME VOLUME VOLUME MET STREET STREET BOTH APP HIGH APP BOTH APP HIGH APP BOTH APP HIGH APP ? (WARRANT, 1 1 500 150 990 462.5 693 $23.75 x1"Sjq WARRANT 2 1 1 750 75 990 462.5 693 323.75 zQ` /sr..~Sxt.•. BIWARRANT 11 , , 990 210 990 462.5 990 462.5 r>_;::..:zx EXHIBIT - / 02 9 PAGE ----.OF J~j~" BY :SATE SUBJECT SHEET NO._..., OF ® PROJECT NO. WO n7l cc-W~e W r fr:'a..t ra A. . t: C j7 Gr f I! p w'l r f ire , G DUrJ° rav►~aw~ ar~~Vars ~ f c~~~r~~✓ fa a; i j 7 o,or 1 0$ 1 Z ~ pr o ~i F.c~ ~ un~ a A41( ~EA'IG O~'~/'a5/~G-' 7a/200Ue'.?~ L,,a>JE~ ` 530 311900 1l~la.jr~w¢" lJ t3 i ~ -330 2-31100 17C 50 q-00 pl(~ UJ~ 3 ln5 25 j 5~ l Ai 6\xv,0 A LonJ- Cc*~' J or c""t "HIBIT OF PAGE rJ , L ~ sG loom= NEW ®Q SUBJECT BY DATE SHEET NO. OF ® PROJECT NO. b.) 2 • 4 e ~zc/`i? i~hq `'!ti D Je M P~'] l~ ' fv1 G!s 1~" doss o~ ~not~ 1 yea- J , 3. g51. E°erce~~ler s e~r~ o o~%~C 4ra4G e b~ 12- p ri o o~ J deemed rP velv,6/e, 1 ca nT' 4r- G(G! ~1 i L /~iS l Tom/' ZD! Fr° f/ ~Y! r a Cs L; /CL c, e ,os~d eecL ..,5 pA or viep cut UQL4xrc e-111 be < -:Irr 0 d -131 IEXHIw e 11113,111 SUBJECT BY , DATE SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. gj`i tJ ex 712wo1 6; - _ c 610 a,5aal 9c®mo e41"c, -c-.-; ~LtOaf-jo~YS~ e.j, 5-le yed h fetsecAron ttJl ®f~~ r "5 s pu d, 3' aloe 5a+r~e ~pe o~ 1644 lv,)atra,~ ® 40 10 VJ 5 vkow et- hcw e jom`hec eol, !e . wox- 1 IVO 74 yob 4l ARM ,,II r 260 bekw ~ a..~. PAGE - MEN= SUBJECT - ~ Sr DATE SHEET NO. OF PROJECT NO. ozs wl<e4,. pe rce n 4"Ce, each, 61k4 LL/'0-4 op'c i eel e d ! a_4~ (142 Vi re arie n /s /64 ~r ~ 'Pi'pTCG~c.~ _ uk ® ff s Pr--+Pc_-Fa h fe`v_(5~;rUI yJC 411 u- EXHISr, v PAGE r o a. ~ ~ 3~ ~ sms- 4, ~ ✓ v ~~P ~ G.4J~ ~ / Vf ~ L. ~ Lv.~ ~ ~ [~tA~st-/S~fw' +b`~ j ~4 Q AA 15 CIL I z 5' yc/ ill M Lit K) woz 7zw ®F PAGE evised heft Turn Pocket Warrant Analysis Project lumber: 1050 iect Name-- ' ettson,5 Analysis Description: 1994 With Project, With Walnut Connection Date: 02-se -93 FILE: H:\PROJFfLE\1050\94RMT4A.W 1 Data Input Range of Values Opposing Volume 415 100 - 800 Advancing Volume 605 Left Turns in Advancing Volume 125 Percentage Lefts 21% 55o to 30% Analysis: . Required Advancing Volumes 269 Decision: YES Warrant i s Opposing Required Advancing Required Advancinz v o 387 Lower Opposing 400 27-4 200 347 Interpolated 415 269 300 310 Upper O osine 500 248 400 273 500 248 600 223 700 01 80Q 179 I _ EXHIBIT PAGE _~~OF 3dws 1101HX3 Advancing Volume (Va) CD M o M. CD ~o 0 0 C) 0 0 ~ O ' pN - ' G ' O O ~O O C® c z3 O CD Cl) C) CD CD CD Ck ~ o 0 -i------------------ -F- -------t---------- v r CO ; S Revised Left Turn Pocket Warrant Analysis Project Number: 1050 v j Name- Thy., rd Albertsons Analysis Description: 1994 With Walnut Extended. Service Access Date: 02-Se 93 FILE: H:\PROJFILE\1050\94N~rix'SA.V✓ 1 Fir-put Range of Values Opposing Volume 415 100 - 800 Advancing Volume 540 Left Turns in Advancing Volume I Percentase Lefts 0% 5% to 309' Analysis: Required Advancing Volumes 503 Decision: YES W a t Cur e for v Innut " c Opposing Required Advancing Required v o Advancinc, 100 '1 Lower Opposing 400 5 200 640 Inte olated 415 503 300 575 Upper Opposing 500 460 400 510 500 460 00 410 _ 370 800 330 Aloft law EXHIBIT 'r 3 PAGE CC) CD, Lij rr t----------------- i................ O U o ® U-) 0 - - - v°o cz c n I O o ~ co c ; Z CD S C~ O O r O tO T N ,r (PA) awnlOA 6uioulanpy EXHIBIT _ f PAGE r„_„_,,,_OF 3~ S ji~ SUBJECT A-✓1c~1.as.: c BY /'ice P DATE SHEET NO. OF °i~t C-~tf? L~ kt - 7SC~N PROJECT NO. ~~5c L7 . Z37 ! ~o G%L evrwcc .5s LT ~ j1JES~T city f -AA.) c~ ~j o EXHIenr V SUBJECT .L2,c,c.~C ~o.,~,iir_--_ c1! BY / •K.~ OATS SHEET NO. OF y ~7r-2D .~JzTS?C PROJECT NO. /,n S 0 loom ~C% GI/ )i G i1G-~ ~ .•L'ECC'S~V. i ors Gy~ `Li+~~v~..,~~ N£C.:6i M Afflik aim: MEW EXH1131T / r PAGE ____„oOF 3/ G Elm I Elm M MVW M M M M V BE on M M M ffm MOM M Northbound Thru/Right Lane On Wa'lnut YEAR 2010 QUEUE LENGTH PROBABILITIES Approach volume (vph): 330 Probability 0.95 Length of red interval (sec): 42 Number of turning lanes: 1 Prob. of Queue Pick One P.' fiber of vehicles arriving Arrivals Length Above the :luring the red interval (N) N (ft) 1st Arrow 0 1.000 0 1 0.979 25 2 0.897 50 3 0:739 75 4 0.537 100 5 0.3.12 125 6 0.192 150 7 0.096 175 8 0.043 200 9 0.017 225 10 0.006 250 -0 P 11 0.002 275 rn m 12 0.001 300 :1 13 0.000 325 14 0.000 350 15 0.000 375 0 16 0.000 400 17 0.000 425 i 8 0.000 450 1 19 0.000 475 20 0.000 500 W~ 1 _ ~Ir'' j ill INV Northbound Left Line on Walnut YEAR 2010 QUEUE LENGTII PROBABILITIES Approach volume (vph): 60 Probability 0.95 Length of red interval (sec): 75 Number of turning lanes: 1 Prob. of Queue Pick One 1' . fiber of vehicles arriving Arrivals Length Above the during the red interval (N) N (ft) 1st Arrow 0 1.000 0 1 0.713 25 2 0.355 50 3 0.132 75 4 0.038 100 5 0.009 125 6 0.002 150 < 7 0.000 175 8 0.000 200 9 0.000 225 10 0.000 250 11 0.000 275 M w 12 0.000 300 q 13 0.000 325 14 0.000 350 15 0.000 375 n 16 0.000 400 17 0.000 425 < 18 0.000 450 ~J 19 0.000 475 20 0.000 500 Eastbound ThrulRight Lane On Schulls 'EAR 2010 QUEUE LENGTH PROBABILITIES Approach volume (vph): 370 Probability 0.95 Length of red interval (sec): 45 Number of turning lanes: I Prob. of Queue Pick One fiber of vehicles arriving Arrivals Length Above the ;furies the red haerval (N) N (ft) I st Arrow 0 1.000 0 1 0.990 25 2 0.945 50 3 0.840 75 4 0.678 100 5 0.491 125 6 0.319 150 7 0.185 175 8 0.097 200 9 0.046 225 10 0.020 250 11 0.008 275 m~ f 12 0.003 300 13 0.001 325 14 0.000 350 toy 15 0.000 375 ' 16 0.000 400 17 0.000 425 'Al 18 0.000 450 19 0.000 475 20 0.000 500 EMEME Eastbound Left Lane on Scholls YEAR 2010 ` QUEUE I_ENG'm PROBABILITIES Approach volume (vph): 120 Probability 0.95 Length of red interval (sec): 75 Number of turning lanes: I Prob. of Queue Pick One h'l iher of vehicles arriving Arrivals Length Above the during the red interval (N) N _ (ft) Ist Arrow 0 1.000 0 1 0.918 25 2 0.713 50 3 0.456 75 4 0.242 100 5 0.109 125 6 0.042 150 7 0.014 175 8 0.004 200 9 0.00 ' 225 10 0.000 250 11 0.000 275 12 0.000 300 < 13 0.000 325 O 14 0.000' 350 15 0.000 375 16 0.000 400 r. 17 0.000 425 18 0.000 450 19 0.000 475 20 0.000 500 41 e : l r r, 1 576 j., • 41:1. C j BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD Aft ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that'we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which 'would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS ~ • 1~5 ~ t~ 7~, -4 a° ~ iVic- -rr1 ~ rf-1- S l~ • / ~ C1 ~ r_ ~ G` .~17 - ~ 717 rr-~ ) , jyL C v' /j / J I 1 PETITION (JWS0910.23) M EXHIBIT - PAGE ~OF .3 /,~5 A. BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan 6L, amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAMME ADDRESS GZ41 11 sub 135° c~ IT ~Ar i Out, I &14V7 UJI 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.23) 3 I l t BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. , NAME ADDRESS ~L. ~/,P'l ~ 5s5 .S. W • a* fin. f~aa3 /Ou LQ l.c: ys- 6 S l~ ~J az Adak Sl„/ AU 4a vat' i t bib ~ r lam` t4 A. I 41 0 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) MEOW BEFORE THE CITY OF ^IGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) `PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in. favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 4S 4) /it U 2 t l IS (1 s ~5 • %3 s~ 14 t OF tLIJ A Y\IJ f x 1 - PETITLON (J;IS0910.2J) . .s' ! c? e - BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of - Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plane amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS cl~ 0- 01Lll~ s 3~- J-)~3-~- 9-W-3' - -3 ~ &W, ~Usj. 1A LJ 1 A1-1I v 4-9 7! 144 AdMIL 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSON S' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 1 6L/S 1'~IovLC~ - . r r~~ 1 , &A It \CA 1y635 5, W, quail- N ic) I 5&J C, L c 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 1 IS@ BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS° INC. ) Ara PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the AlbertsonsI Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. AME ` ADDRESS CY 1 ~ a 14~~~12 54-0 ~ s a C) {'a n 1 ~(~5(r S41 01 C` C~~~SF e C3 cas 1 y, eSr S U/ S 11 r= 9 P r ~f~`I S4~ s F 'd tic 1 - PETITION (J'WS091D.2d) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD' ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed'at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. " NikME ADDRESS i I►~y~ ;tom .13 +``1 11~2-73L.,j 13-A /f 7 Ot 72L.-? 7/7 i C t iCLU1 ~►t~ GJ < Gr ? 7~ ~j E'- ° tic) _V , ~ T2~~3 t~ \)~%J s• f - S, ~..~~1',~ZII~ ACT / ee+cc~cn vroc~~J - 1 Ct ` La 1 i • 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) ~w ~ i t BEFORE THE CsTi ^vi TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the A,lbertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. ' NAME ADDRESS f 25~ b ~ l 1 t/ kz_ r << LAIL-, C"/'. - AL /a/4/ v I !AJ4'L L~-- I tj ~_jl lU a.> 4250~~~J 0iKjATtA_ Tt Q, N 1 lb4t 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 3~3 i BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in. favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS i l n ci 2,2v' go S,h{e;bn^ 9070 -td ;r' W)cw ai -7 -7 _ 47 VN. J 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 31 `f 15111 1 i BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. , ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that sae are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray' Boulevard extension-Walnut. N E ADDRESS (-4 lt c DD--and 97D-3 71 q0 ON cl~ f VK~ Ix 1/1 1 •PETI'T102. (JWS0910.2J) - a BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS° INC. ) I ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertson s' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. j NAME ADDRESS ii 1(111x., _G\'~~PC k~ tt'u` 1 ,<<Lv - YG~ ~ ~ C17 1-v J ; 1 f X3 3 _S VV 131 f7Z~l c`~-l ~ v~ l1(, ~ Lri~✓ ~ ~ ~ 4J f~ C. U -71A1~ y t r ~7 '-a " /138s v 1:_-r' Ll 5. (25 _0 L qd 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.23) .:,nom BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scb,olls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 7 5, tt-11 135~ 11, qaA-Lt,1 d,( Xfacq it G~ f . lid p, S"6 k4 G' ! ~►~i✓r ' 1 T t 4 U-61 S"16) /3s' 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 3~ 7 BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which, would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS !/22.o 1574-) f/9 A-'~ ~ y 72~ l/ 5'4/ l/1rf ® o SkI Uk6 ~ ~ ? 13sr 115-y-7 1 - PETITION (J14S0910.2J) NINE 10M-- P11: I ij~i~~ 111:11 BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor.of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Sc1l,olls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS t , C), X3 4 3~ C)a 1 l / QU J I9 aS~ Sw ,L 1 i~1 Z~ i Order cnc cioj C4, `e tcC/ IX 41 ;Vh,ri6 - /mot ir, -lf~ 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J)~ ti Emma BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS S , / 0 / 't 9W S ~n !::r Gq t ~c fcIZ3 13S 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) gig 118JEEMN M' BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD F ERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that aae are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. A NAME ADDRESS L -175 1115r x(575 S 0 ~a c7fOD US03 4W (__?S J12 I'tt 17- L'61L A L, ~_b3 11563 5W, 41110 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) . 331 MEEMMEM BEFORE THE 'r'ITY OF TIGARD Awl ALBERTSONS' INC. PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex, to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scl olls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 9 7,2 .4 A. sw r f7 Dai~b4q_41&(o 7-1 ?~q& 972 r CL jeer r.W. ,mss Dsu kb4 4 # OS @ z `j°~ 2V3 2 U e..a -Aze'-fanf 16 a a ~ v a U O ( CJ LAI 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 33~ BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PE'T'ITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS L) 0, A ko" 1 Ask ICA"- 97=3 Pe i~d ai f~ ` 9° ~S~S h 1o L 1 ~Z 1Z A) . ' CITI t ~ 1Z i 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) r ' BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS° INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the AlbertsonsI Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS J_ A5411-1 8170 ItA'-. 4111A 4FT Xd Z 45 - 13 r 5--C) / t~ I~jlvt91~L'C~ Z-1 -2 !ter j es 60 a. ;CC) a , r:'•~ iC 5(.J -tip EPL 'R 1 - PETITION (JWS0920.2J)r ` f 46 ' ~/S u j s ly \ of v a 14 crc 3 I ~ BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ' ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that ve are in favor of, the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS /j 74 lG~ /r' acrG~ . o 7 6v---,-' !O c'¢SD ~ v 2,I I i ~J Z/C' St c.vtA 0. 5 G+~.4~ v v ~v~~ 15wc1 dv~.S S~ ids Tom.,( a~ 97c.Z,J 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) Pill REM .9 11 ~ BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug, store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension.-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS D ` ova, 21 s~ 7 J t Gam,a~ 77 (5;;ACb r ,day s~~~ ~ 3 w i I~ 3 w a3~_TrA ~4 TICA12D r' 4 113 Ski /3 s 7 , 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) r i BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS U~~/ ° 120 t6A ' In . 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 331 111111 Ole Ilia 1111 law= BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and -Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. ` ADDRESS &-co se- S, d " 44V ~k 52' t. . 1016 1 - PETITION ('JWS0910.2J) 33g BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD Ask ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 113Z ! 1,3 5 -7-16,99D. / F- . S 3G /mss -4~ lr3oq 'YLL' e3~ b t V o 3 of 3 'p J s r 0, 3 1 LX //C AOL 1 - ;ETITION (JWS0910.23) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Sclkolls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. N dE ADDRESS 2 ~oc/G- 11 . I w ' 47a~~ 41 vo-zo A K-~ .q. i mac! _ 1V 97& s 1~ l Z i i 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) i BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS CDP ` t `f vr~'4 a'i a 6? 111 !U' ./7./IA✓n r t".) 7 1 ~1 4- Len. r, q-Dr'oy L 77 -.n ti r~~ r.,-u- f 4 G ►J G C tom- l Cl A j -2 rj c j J`~Zr~..?`• ~Z[•f.•S ~L1~~ /GL ~Z ~141 LAC i 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 3 ~f( BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 3As 6V,J 9-J2 ST L4130 s v-~ TUA L A 1~1 D ~ l~' ~l 14 G0 T-7 . I y r 1rj-_-15 v l• 1 PETITION 1 (JWS0910.2J) Elm Ulm BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving th_- Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard'extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 7 _ i G c!( L ,r 9 Ikka err- 70C~ i 21 -7 x a - • I ~a~S ~ti~ - acv ba( 17 U 6- 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) A, Jill BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS ~ n CK, )Jajlu~( N)'Iyujl Y 776~5 AIIJ f 11\1 11 ~jl~ tC 1 ) `J V uj / 2- (cam Sc 'e c~- i?b f inn IS-F ~ f r 15 S 2( IC[LiIC% 5"l ft'al r+l /r>4 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 1 ♦ ' BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the AlbertsonsI Apnlication for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which 7-rould allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS Ad 210 - W/11 ? a &JObA I C~ OAQ -Ab -t C'\ I L) S4~ j r~ ZI le- Apt, Ta I4 O y D SL's QOj iA r I 3-K J4 >r'1 l ".SCE C) I o EAU te6 1 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a.grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS ,/f1 /I ~ e• 11 IITTTT''l~~~~ ~~V ~ ~ ~ ' fem. ~ - I 1 /s 'V C~~ \ / y F~YC n _V0 ►~r /^r a 4+ -G a- A 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) INNER' BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTJSONS° INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the AlbertsonsI Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scbolls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS ~ {tom/ ~ r7f, c: l X 1. 11 !14 /3 6 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we-are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS il . /4/9/6 sw au rc.~~ ~3_1 A?41 I ILI C4 J -Wold S-c/dk rgvpl-l. SWI) L' r QP 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS° INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. ~ NAME ADDRESS /•ir_w Old z /rs 7j' QI- e e4 At", Esc, Lrs~~ - lYW? Sc~, 0/.( 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) MEN= b f • !1 BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 156- co 1ZC' J Ise- .6'r 01? Ci7e9r)(~ 0V W3 teDLL, sw?Z~3~ n Ll -D L'> S _34 JCs -R L9 5z,?25 UU i~f33u ~lr 1 ~A 1 P)ee.~r. G~ 97 11 M)d &)kt o0'5 hl.f e 330 V ~~J kit "YO 1 - PETITION (JWS0910'.2J) f ~55 6 ENSUE= f BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) j PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS a ' 6 ~ Ash T7 i S~ ~r2 2 O`~ rlCr~ O ! 1 , I tl c_ cmt c i' La-, ~-z a 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) w ' I BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC.. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug' store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. A NA14E ADDRESS 1H~~~ S~+ otd S alt Ito i 129-4-5- ~~ti L.h ~C L I , 1 ok, 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug, store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 0 0NN 141 1 M17 _ .ad 0n re ~ l O ~ 1 ~JE' S-L~. , ~a~~~c~n • ,d~ ~cclet"t'dol, 1'211 S P ~SD 0 C r / - ,/a E22~0 Z3 d. . 1- ETITION (JWS09101.2J) r va ` BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. } PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS Ix 40d 11 nc' t I C 4 'lr~ l 0 Z1 L+i 7 AJ I-Z-L-Zc) SL,> cfj P n `ZZza Sdt3 ~leN~ ~ 1 ~ 4 41 1 Z? S~ S w I~ , ~ cam,/ ~ r, ~ tic? SZ; 1,2,7 j4) SW - 1~141- ^ 'PI I N 1 ETIT (JWS0910.2J) 17ALBER BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD INC. ) PETITION ) e undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of oving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension--Walnut. NAME ADDRESS 7 7 f~ 2~Z / Z .5 G~ ~e -e A LPL. L'.j 1 G ov e' l 11I1 _ gz~ SrJ 114 ail fj1,t,4'_'k 6U11-22 I LZ) L(q~kjl C-2~p 41~_41~) 0 5V-) &d. 4 7 i 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 355 Wom BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. ' NAME ADDRESS [i,PC jM t.r cO. f 70 QdS ~ tg03 o Sw L ~3z~~ z z~ 13954 A/4-c,c,/ / f ft-rV am ~2,7 'j" 0Z 4-M U, j -P] /y , 7Loj lines 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) 35G BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the City of Tigard approving the Albertsons' Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a. grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS D A.'?_ Ile J 5 IV Mt. yap IL U- 61 .l 1#7-'? / C 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) BEFORE THE CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSONS' INC. ) PETITION ) We, the undersigned, state that we are in favor of the. City of Tigard approving the AlbertsonsI Application for comprehensive plan amendment and zone change which would allow a grocery and drug store complex to be developed at the southeast of corner of Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard extension-Walnut. NAME ADDRESS Z'V Ze Mcl p er?~~ e ~~1/Lo S~ sc 67t V n1A -~,n1C~ /4 t2-0 ~w T n..1 :t~20D 4F _0 k4 I lv~ 7 /7 J r- k Ildt, (1j; I C."/ji; J-7 L'i _(6j) 1 - PETITION (JWS0910.2J) • f jDL12 01-14-94 10:54A1r1 FROM KiTTELSON & ASSClc•. TO 9/6646971 FOO~i00~ WASHINGTON IBM COUNTY, OREGON Date: January 13, 1994 Mr. Evan P. Dust, Associate Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97205 RE: TRAPPIC ACCESS STUDY w iZtlARD ALBEiR.6:SONS M This office has received a traffic Access'Report, "Traffic Analysis Report", by Keech Associates, Inc., date 9-17-93 for the subject development. Pursuant to R&O 86-95, a complete Traffic Access Report is required prior to determining recommendations for conditions of development. (X): The submitted analysis meets or exceeds thG requirements for an Access Report. Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Land Development Division, is hereby notified that the required Access Report is accepted as complete. The submitted Access Report is incomplete'. Additional information is required to enable staff to determine findings and recommendations for this land development project as described on the attached Checklist. These are the minimum requirements for acceptace of Access Reports. If you have any'.questions please call me at 693-4815. Doug Dorval, P.E., Traffic Analyst DN/AHS Ex"Ieff CC: Lynn Bailey PAGE Tom :marry file G:\USERS\ABBASN\OATAWP\stoli612.WP5' 3 S DeWment of Land Use & Manspomfion F~n i -un SUM -1 RECEIVED PLANNING JAN 14 1994 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 435 B.°_.NJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA ONE S.W. COLUMBIA STREET PORTLAND. OREGON 97258 TELr.Pi-IVNL° (503) 228.6515 TELECOPIER(503) 228.7468 January 14, 1994 Mr. Dick Bewersdorff Senior Planner Tigard City Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon Re: CPA 93-0009, ZON 93-003, SIDR 93-0014, CUP 93-002 and MLP 93-0013 Response by Owner's of Tax Lot 100 and 200 to Marcott Memorandum Submitted by Edward Sullivan, Esq., Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: As you know, this office has been involved on behalf of owners of Tax Lot 100 and 200, since mid-1991, in the various applications by Albertson's, Inc. for zone change and comprehensive plan .amendments. We have also been involved with the current zone change, site development review, conditional use approval and minor land partition now before the City Council to finally allow development of a neighborhood grocery store and accessory uses. The owners wish to make one procedural point in response to Marcott's memorandum and oral comments by their counsel, Edward Sullivan, on the December 14th, 1993, hearing before the City Council. The Council is well aware of the years of involvement of the competing commercial interests of Albertson's, Inc. and Marcott's Thriftway in numerous contentious hearings when Albertson's original application for variance from NC zone and zone change. Those hearings were followed by further contention's hearings in which the Marcott interest were fully heard on the adoption of the community commercial zone by the City of Tigard. Despite this public and private involvement, the Marcott faction has awaited the final hearing before the City Council to appear in opposition to thg NC zone change, plan review, and conditional use approval. They erroneously assert that staff and applicant chose not to inform them of the present lengthy proceeding before the planning Commission and Council.. See, Marcott memorandum, p. 1;. 361 Mr. Dick Bewersdorff Page 2 The assertion is patently false. The staff scrupulously followed the notice requirements and publication requirements as is documented in the files. The City Development Code is crystal clear on how notice of public hearings are to be given in quasi-judicial proceedings such as this proceeding. These requirements are set out at Code Section 18.32.130 A.1 and 2.i 'A. Notice of an impending action pursuant to Subsections 18.32.090.B, C, and D shall be given by the Director in the following manner: 1. At least 20 days prior to the scheduled hearing date, or if two or more hearings are scheduled, 10 days prior to the first hearing, notice shall be sent by mail to: a. The applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the property which is the subject of the application; b. All property owners of record within 250 feet of the property for the following types of applications: (i) Subdivisions; (ii) Sign Code Exceptions; (iii) Administrative Sign Variances; (iv) Sensitive Land Permits (100-year floodplain); (v) Conditional Use Permits; and (vi) Planned Developments; (vii) Comprehensive Plan Amendments; (viii) Zone Changes; 3 G 4 Mr. Dick Bewersdorff Page 3 The veiled threats of lack of notice impinging on Marcott's due process rights is absurd for two primary reasons: First, Marcott concedes that they were out of the "personal notice range," but failed to mention they could have placed themselves within the "personal notice range" by requesting notice of proceedings effecting Tax Lot 100 and 200 by a letter and payment of the fee provided for in 18.32.130 A.1(e). They further artfully refrain from stating they did not have actual notice of the proceedings; second, the implied lack of personal notice is irrelevant as the Marcott interest is solely based upon restricting grocery store competition. A competitive advantage held by one whose property is not subject of the zoning complained of, is not a protected property interest under the due process clause of the United States Constitution.2 (ix) Zone Ordinance Amendments; x*: (e) Any person who requests, in writing, and pays a fee established by the Council; and s s 2. Notice of a hearing on a proposed zone change for a mobile home park shall be given to tenants of that mobile home park at least 20 days but no more than 40 days prior to the hearing; and 3. Mile Director shall cause an affidavit of mailing of notice to be filed and made a part of the administrative record. B. At least 10 days prior to the hearing, notice shall be given in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. An affidavit of publication shall be made part of the administrative record. (Ord. 90-41; Ord: 90-24; Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52) 2Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51 (1979). 3~ a . Mr. Dick Bewersdorff Page 4 The City's generosity in alloviii ng the f»ld hearing of December 14th to the tardy Marcott faction is laudatory, but it may set dangerous precedent for the future. Allowance of last hearing--first appearances before the Council--which is supposed to decide on the record before the Planning Commission (Tigard Code Section 18.32.090 D.2(c)) nullifies the work of the Planning Commission and guarantees delay and disruption of orderly consideration by both bodies. The last minute submissions of new matter not considered by the Planning Commission should be avoided, where possible, to block the criticism of commentators that under Oregon's land use scheme delay of the complicated procedure is the most effective tool to defeat planned use proposals. The record in this case amply demonstrates the City and applicant's dedication to notify-u-tg the entire community of the land use changes sought here. In conclusion, 1 wish to reiterate, on behalf of the land owners, our respect for the staff and Planning Commission's detailed examination of these proposals, which, in our judgment, comply with the spirit and letter of the Code and applicable state-wide Goals and Guidelines. Very truly yours, GARRY P. cMURR.Y & ASSOCIATES L4 Garry . Mc GPM:cw cc: Mr. Scott Russell Mr. John W. Shonkwiler Mr. Edward Sullivan c: \wp51\1tr\bewer.ltr i` TRI-MET ENGINEERING TEL:503-239-2281 Jan 14 94 17:02 No.015 P.01 post-It- brand fax transmittal memo 7511 sal p°d°m o n d t•- opt. ' ] p phone a - le'~ 1(® Faxa !C1• F°6a I-MET TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION 710 N.E. HOLLADAY STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 Post-It- brand fax transmittal memo 7671 F -f a•a°a (503) 239.2100 FAX (603) 239-2280 i Co' . ".lr!tt~1 January 14, 1994 ~hanoa o73dd • (®~1 Fax* ~I Faxq - Victor Adonri City of Tigard Community Development 1.3 )125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 . Subject: Scholls Ferry Road Albertson's Dear Victor: Tri-Met appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Albertson's development proposal on Scholls Ferry Road in Tigard. The purpose of this letter is to clarify issues surrounding the existing and projected level of transit service. Tri-Viet considers a site to be served by transit if it is within 1/4 toile of a bus or 1/2 mile of a light rail stop. This stop is therefore not considered to be served by existing transit. Future service to the site would depend upon a series of factors including: o projected new transit passengers balanced against the asiwunt of vela .le hours needed to serve them when compared to other existing transit service o City of Tigard priorities for location of transit service o intensity of future development along the Scholls Ferry Road or Murray Road corridors o presence of adequate pedestrian linkages along the corridor and between properties within 1 /4 mile of Scholls Ferry Road o transit priority measures implemented by the City of Tigard and other public right-of-way designers to enhance bus operations along this corridor At this time, Tri-Met has no plans to expand service to the portion of the Scholls Ferry Road corridor where the proposed development site is located. Please call me at 239-6716 if you have any questions or require further clarification regarding Tri-Met service. Sin I K ly Knox, Project Coordinator ,it Development Department CZ: Evan Dust, Kittelson Assoc. Dennis (trimmer 1 Es`~~rn~ty Tf<I-COUNTY METRC4101LITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT Of ..'OREGON / ber~s eis a I _ - _ r 1 . -q y ~ ~ i ~ - ~ I - l l 3~ -i _ / / j ~ ~ / / , / ~ y~ l r Ali i ~ J J / A/butsans ~ , r I ~l ; ? ~ ~ / ,'3 / / ~ , r v y ~ 1 / ~ ~ / ~ / s . f4 , / ~ , ~ ~ ~ III / ~ ~ ~ / / I ~ ~ / ' ~ - - / iU ~ 1 / ~I I 1 / / \ ~ 3 ,3 ~ III / i 30, \ 25 3 ~ 3 ~ W ~ ; ~.1 1 I /y / I~ 3 3 ~„31~ / \ 2 3 I ~ '"'40~ y ~ \ 1 ~ 11 / ,I ; ; ti ~ 3 3 ~ p \ I ~ - . ~ i 3 ,5 /3 ~ 1 .Z /00'B.PA. E.~m~~ 3 ~ I - \ ~ ~ a` 2 1 _3 3 1 ~1 y j G 1 3 1~ I i ~a 3: ~ 1 I '.r~ 1 ~ ~ tll , ~ p 3 6 ; n ~ ~ ~ h~ p. I a~ ~ i . i I c>`fsTe~E7" P~~/Ci/y~ I ~ ~ ~ ~o cs~,civ~s 9x/8 ~ ~ ~ , ~ , qo ccyPAq SP.kfs Sx/5 "-5GFl~i LE of /JN/TS ` 50 PA,4Ci//G SPA 9x/8 Ear. °`,E 5 HkNO/r/ilP /Zx /8 RUSSELL .MARTMENT S/T£ l7 UN//; ~ /OE59f 3,vj' 2947// rN. ISOa /•/s •sa ~pP.a~H-z / l55 ToTA - rioawo,oR£ooN /7 UN/l5ca ¢933f:2 ~y G SPkGIS ~ UN/T5 p 82/5f 2 f~OBoaM /FZf)R/N i , . Y7 s-N/T3 c~ 6999f / fJ.~,u~N1-Y fi~'TN - OPMFMT . J2 Tar/IL UN/75' . i ' ~U- ; ; gam. ~MBULTANT3,INC: ~ .+1 57ofY Gd.1'~GtyS~/ /fPAR1H6VT' fR51B1•ARntleltmm! l ~ _ - - ~ - / ~ 'S~~Y. AP/~!-/i~'1~. .~OG ~ - ~50.31~~Ba081 PLANNING ~ ~ - CIVIL ENGINEERING f oll ~ - - - - :ueaao. nn SURVEYING 08!21/96 - ip~giUlil iAl!Id~J11li ~ ~ ~i .4ili q~ i~i~i in ~ i l g ~i i tfgggqi i i i i i i i i ~ i ~i~ ~ u i i t qi~ t~ ~ ~ ~a , ~ W.. ~ ~ / uhuioiilimiiiifioi~dmi i'idini~l~iiuiVmmilnuiiulmuidininidiiuioim Iniuaii~iuiihiuiiiduouulumualfiii~iVmiudouuidr a i~ n o uT i,,, , \ •y,,' ~ t W .~^e: ,jam .K~~I~,tjY~ P`r P, , "3: , ~b{•w ~ .rya ; 4i5. . `~iiKr,`~t.~KN 1,` ,x*~t br v as a ~ ~ ' r6= .a Ct" ~ ~'+,~,~"n`"~ "M:~ i~ °s. , i tr n.S 1`• - r n # y``{, r t~~X; rt ~ t ~ •~'tir:7i!Tr,~ ~ t~ "y° ' T'`indt `,Y~. ~ .~'";~y~itv~~i/a'^• ~~;',~'tf•~tf lrs~: R a,-I ,`r y Z'n ",•'~~,~}~~,r ''yr~~;,y:':r ~~1~' a' _ -.11 •',TA Rnty~ t~$'.. ryk3[! L1`- 6 r Y' ~ . Y 'A, ~ ~.Y rw S,t x+: ~.s?~; ' d s~.,;~A' ' T7 ' ~ ti~ L.5 x7 Y~ i' Z ~ n : { ,~'S~t=a41.' •`i.Y :~`~i~'?~a~~ i', ;.~tf y .f -i:. ~ s r C ip~ ~l p.~ ,j.•,y ,r. r~`~ry i n,. 'n a ..4 .~4~r ,,~2~.~'y~A . ~ ~ ' r.~~.6 .7j`f'.. # 3 I t rt + ,r:.7` ~ ; ~ `'°+w, =S-a : ~y . r ~ _ ~ -y 1?! T9.,.a ..Ft~ k r t X ~ ~ ,_7,-- F ~,<3! 1 +p •y`~` t-' r i V'~ aY.t ~u ~ ~ ie. '1^ at33.s''t',•>+,x i. rf as r. .:"~9'at t F~a -•1, zr,N+^'y:r I~~ i~ r, 1^ L~ .t J~a,^ K r r l.' I ,•i x t "ti•iT'~,Y "{~'x 1 t ~'t +,Y y~^» I. *s. or~ 'Y~`a x~~~ ag~~F ~ M;a• ty,m i s _ ~ ~r t ~ I ~ •-i 'vd .'a~ ~ 1 rTL'" yy~ ~ r / ~ h,~ti*,.~`"0-~t:.i'vx 1..: ,~5 k.s 7t+ ~I~l` ~ ".`:'~}l .,b i''.1 ra J yyp 41fNi.-371 - ',N:y. }'~35. x't 1~Rt i '.a ~ 'i ~ •'i?Y,T ~1 ,.I, ~ ~ ~ 1.1p„,Y ~ 7.1 4, 'Lf .za;k + ~ r„ 'T' . s : II v r ~r - It r _C~ ~ r ` rr 3. t ~f ~t I :K: _ I"' _ a `:y„. f't' r ~irr R.~ 3, m. I. ;E r ,,w. " , ~ ~ ~ I t r . ter. c; ~~l , ~,:y I Ji s'. ~'X ?yT _ t , ~ , y fat +I x ' "r' ~ ' :,7 ~':~a ~ i~it 4 f WI`1 4~. ! L ;.S - ~f y riRtt _ f f. I. ~a I3 ~ T .1' ~ < s~k5 4, ^ ~ ~ i,U,. c}._u `,".~atf. y~ -~t• ;f:... r' =t ~ j ~1=:- 6 ~`~=~''`r-T'_~a 1 i ~ ra %u ~ Jw,:' ~ r , s+' y y r+.. v`' ..i 4 .r S.~~ t ~ Z" f: ~ ~4R . S S?'.. i ~ f 1 i t ~ _ Z .+.sV i ``11 jp H • . r"' ~ Yt 4-. s n~lVt . k' t 1. < 2 K, r~r~~~ "S,. ,Z~+4~, "4 :a'~'t~ 1 W .^~'Tf 't ~ .fir z _ n~. ~.'~':.$,fkY.a, ;t rte' . ,.a }r F! 'i' r'r i+i'- u4X- t, ~ o~ i ~ _ Y. I hti ~ sir r - '',~;,4x ."a y t .7 _ ':~:r 4 M er i 7 ~ t ~2 ~ : 1 t ~ +;kz7:."'d+ . ~ Y+; - K, qq l`~Y~:':. " tw .,ir, t - a.$,9\ ir~~ y,~`.I x~° ° l~ ":,nr~LXi~'P." 1'v+, 'T4, :~~I~,'~'.~,5St~"M-*" -..~A~ ~ i .;=n`19~a 'b *•C.•., ti't' : 1~ . 4.. K f, :~.i.r pia rd • 'y ~r.~t''x ``,y ~ a J I ~ .tr H ~L. 2a"'~ t c ~ . Y •t ~ uzr',~ K~' x ye 1~~ i J' 1•~ jai"• r.,-. ~ 1 ` ti t,,.-• •.3:b n~7~.>., r,~;T i::„~..~q,i ,.if ~ V Y•, ' J_L. .:'1 1'M. -4a " } ,A tC 4~~`r l til. •~.=,.fT ~~`~oti~til o- t,µ ~ '•:+:.'i~ _ i ] t ar~nt ri. _ r . . 1 -.ei' .is x4° d~s.`•iW, § T,t. -y •r•' ' 4i': i^• I r ~1, r ~ t: ~I 3. % V Sf " 1~~ t~ ~~'v,. Y ` y. ~ ' t ^ r . r~, . >n f .y, t ~ 'ix:"r w. I ' k ' I ~~,t I:.' ,.t' t,, .aM. l4 L,,, .i~a'~„ a ,tibkli t74: iwr~'` .t: .'i.r '+i"c'~"`'ei> w. a., i'°~,' ~ti" y.7:• ".5°' yx, ~yf'~'~''.~ ! .r FS y 5' t~ 1a" ;•.,;~:.t. ~'~;'~'xta?'z. ~ 'r.4,,,r;^,µux ~i 1. .'.le h ~ y: v4 a'.^•,.iTT 1%,,'yy ,1"1 nls ~i'I .t~'`v'".~ 7~ tl 4)7~ $ ' k;0..•Yi;~.,~ , .y~ ♦r ~ ~ ' ' ~eL~T~,. ay;7., y "t ~ ..i. e~,d ~s^`".'"•? ~"rt. 3R~ 5. •'`-t ! 99 y. ~Y t ~t :v' I:ie: a.~'°- t '.ti S^ aS:,~-s?h~;~"'- „„'~~`,4' ~o ~'ft. *a 'jl +J''N. r Sx ~i F,~'v. kitit rY`~~. r~G • ' ~ ar ~ 7i;;-.t~^il.x„ • 5ib~~:Y' .-1 .n:( .,~~y 6:%:' 4'.C I. •a,r ~ . r`o L 6 ~K~ 7 'h. „l.y,.` .K ~+^AsY .'`i. '.K. 5A', q~.Kf ";4+#•~`~:'+', {I 'tint 'y tJ ,a; .v lira- ~x~_x•.',~'{r::!?k,7, t,,[!r: 3, K.' 1r ^\a, ~17k~`~j5:$.li'Y' r i_ .:.t•. t' n_ i.~rt, +4 M? , ~,.,r ,~y,.,i'~ ~ ..?~aG.S-•,l f r~'i ,:.,o,. r, F.L~ `'4~+ ,z' -~t•Aa^' •...t. +-~e i~~~ -@; r , i . ^G'4;•,'~ '1 ~ , vim' '~t 'tir ~6i.,,•.r, « 1,~R t~ • w'%'~ -'r'~"•'.~ i :1G x+." g.,, .~4• d ~x e t: ~ y '~.4 y e,45 c'?wst;~l".iK~~i^~ aas t1~ ~^'~""~1aP°_vnw.+. [u, 5~'~ .lxu~.i r. Ni .Y~ lF~y'~r r~'~. n trssnt.naende uem5 _ t' i" y'`vj't- 'M'~1 i~r«^_" '.4 `u'~,'tU^.T .,rn*~'"~~;'rx}''~t :M ~ j'.~ 7 - I ,,.f ! `t'a-- r ~t r 1 ~ ~ 4: ~e'x I'.. a . ~e. ;t`I,:~a"•• wsl yC~rj;~- J,. 4 1-,.y.TMl ;~}.:i ~ `aa w`" 2; . ~„><,t, ~er,t ~ , 59..;sds, ;tan., i.;z..t i ' r .X ,ri~`~;2 o!e t ~ . Y.-" r ,in r ram a '`.1:,..' s,•x , t ~ yt i ~4'. , wA, a,- K ~.?uu.,. C k t . i.~t gnryy~°,,~ , ~¢r G.. ~y ;!,ill. to ayfi"+ ti y ~ )s r +~4 rrv,+~., w~,y,J,',;.v:`?m ';,ti'u y.'t',#r T..•,i• a4 xr.... ~q xk.a 4 `i'r t ~ a 'K is -t .`Pf a ati,+ lWl',,: "fir' y'3y., ~~J,:-•a.,: •:-i,,.. nt ~Y'~.-~.~'-*~,~.,,e'R;%'.2',-•; ,:'..;~:'tA~~nyh ~:k .,t.Yrt.sk.~.'r~ Y.. , b.:.'? Tuf.wt,: ...li~,.~ y,MSi 4Na>" at. 5:...t. . i7e. 4w, , 3i 4 • ....)'K +C~:= :.:a'~.~.. - ~miJwai 0812.11.96 _ r; fn IIIU111 II!LU11 1 I Cin II (1I 1 I,tjl ~ ~ I i Ilq ~ I I f I I I~I~I~I I I l II 1I~( ~i f ~!~~~u ~r~ "I ~q 1+; II~P ' ~ ~~'~r, ~ - Idili luiNmllo61ntl1 wl I IdlulifilluliuRi li~lio Ill a mll I$Vi IVdliuuiulol Id16Tllliifiia lidlulil?Il _ 1 V COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY-OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 25, 1994 DATE SUBMITTED: 12130%93 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Japanese Church PREVIOUS ACTION None ZCA 93-0003 Zone Change Annexat;6or~ PREPARED BY: Victor Adonri DEPT HEAD OK LMIV-CITY ADMIN OK Rc~QUESTED BY: Ed Murip IS5UE BEF RE THE COUNCIL Should the City Council forward a request for annexation of two parcels consisting of approximately 1.89 acres located south of SW Spruce Street, at, the easterly corner of SW Hall Boulevard to the Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission?. - STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to the Boundary Commission and to assign a zoning designation of R-7 to the properties. - INFORMATION SUMMARY This annexation request consists of two parcels totaling 1.89 acres that is contiguous to the City of Tigard on SW 83rd Avenue. The owners of the properties requested annexation in order to obtain sanitary sewer service for future development of the properties. The applicant requests annexation via the "expedited method". The "expedited method" requires no public hearing by the Boundary Commission. It will allow annexation approval within 28 days instead of the customary 45 days. Notices were sent to property owners within 250 feet of the subject property. There has been no response from neighboring property owners to the notice. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation to the Boundary Commission and assign a zoning designation of R-7 to the property. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL NOTES The applicant will pay the Boundary Commission fee of $355 for annexation. The current tax assessment is $110,030 The City could increase its tax base by approximately $311. (Assessed value multiplied by City tax base portion of tax rate of $2.83/1000 as of 1/1/,93 = $311.39). 131 Sulu= STAFF REPORT January 25, 1994 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIC°P RD TOWN HALL 13125 3.W. HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 9722? A. CASE: Zone Change .Annexation 93--03 REQUEST: To annex two parcels consisting of approximately 1.89 acres of unincorporated Washington County into the City of Tigard, and for zone change from Washington County R-5 (Res-- enti ai 5 i-lnits per acre) and R-9 (Residential, 9 units per acre) to City of Tigard R-7 (Residential, 7 units per acre). The applicant requests annexation to obtain sanitary sewer service. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: W a s h i n g t o n C o u n t y Residential, 5 units per acre, and Residential 9 units per,acre. ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County R-5 (Residential, 5 units per acre), and R-9 (Residential, 9 units per acre). APPLICANT(S): Denali Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 22791 Milwaukie, Oregon 97269 OWNER(S): Japanese International Baptist Church 5656 SW Humphrey Boulevard Portland, Oregon 97221 LOCATION: South of SW Spruce Street, at the easterly corner of SW Hall Boulevard. (WCTM 1S1 36CB, tax lots 701 & 790) 2. Background Information No previous applications have been reviewed by the City relating to this property. ZCA 93-03 Staff Report 1 3. Vicinity Information All properties to the north of the site are in Washington County and are zoned for single family residential development. Properties to the east are in the City of Tigard and zoned R-7 (Residential, 7 units per acre). Property to the west is in Washington County and is zoned for residential development. All properties to the south are in the City of Tigard and are zoned for residential development at a density of 12 units per acre. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description Both properties to be annexed are currently undeveloped. The properties are primarily covered with grass and some trees. The applicant requested that their parcels be annexed into the City of Tigard in order to obtain sanitary sewer service. An existing sewer line is located at the southerly portion of tax lot 701 which is one of the properties to be annexed. 5. Other Staff Comments The City of Tigard Engineering Department and City of Tigard Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no objections or comments. 6. Agency Comments Tualatin Valley Water District, Metro Area Communication, Tualatin Valley Fire District and Portland General Electric have reviewed the proposal and have offered no objections or comments. 7. Police Department's Consideration The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, Citizen Involvement; 6.3.1, Established Area; 10.1.1, Service Delivery Capacity; and 10.1.2, Boundary Criteria and Chapters 18.136, Annexations; and 18.138, Established/Developing Area Classification of the Tigard Community Development Code. The planning staff has determined ZCA 33-03 Staff Report 2 that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and Community Planning Organization as well as surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the request. 2. Plan Policy 6.3.1 is satisfied because the area toe annexed is designated as an established area on the development standards map. 3. Plan Policv 10.1.1 is satisfied because the City has conducted the Washington County Urban Services Study which includes the subject properties. This study indicates that adequate services are available in the vicinity and may be extended to accommodate the subject properties. 4. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation will not create an irregular boundary that makes it difficult to respond to police emergencies. The properties are located within Tigard's Area of Interest, and adequate service capacities can be.made available to accommodate the eventual development of the properties. The planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the findings noted below: 1. Section 18.136.030 of the Code is met because all facilities and services can be made available, the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies discussed above have been satisfied and the properties has been determined to be an established area in accordance with the criteria in Chapter 18.138 of the Code. Since the properties are within Tigard's Area of Interest, the zone designation shall follow the City's Comprehensive Plan Map designation for medium density use. The most appropriate zone is R-7 and would allow for potential future development of the parcels. 2. Chapter 18.138 of the Code is satisfied because the properties meet the definition for an established area and are designated as such on the development standards area map. ZCA 93-03, staff Report 3 Iffil min C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings noted above, the planning staff recommends approval of ZCA 93-03.-- PREPARED BY: Victor Adoiri,~ Assistant Planner 8 ZCA 93-03 Staff Report AAL~ DENAL I ENONEERIN6, INC. GVIL ENGINEERING • HYDROL06 LAND USE PLANNING october 19, 1993 RE: Tax Lots 790 & 701, Section 36 T1S, RIW, W.M. City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Honorable Gerald Edwards, Mayor and the City Council, The Japanese International Baptist Church hereby respectfully requests annexation to the City of Tigard for two properties it owns east of S.W. Hall Boulevard and south of S.W. Spruce Street. The properties are further identified as Tax Lots 790 and 701 in the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 36, TI.S, R1W, W.M., Washington County, Oregon. - It is further requested that the City of Tigard initiate proceedings through the expedited method of annexation. The following documents accompany this letter: 1. Letter authorizing Denali Engineering, Inc. to act as representative for the Japanese International Baptist Church 2. Copies of the Warranty Deeds verifying ownership of the subject property 3. Copies of tax statements from Washington County showing the assessment districts 4. A metes and bounds description of the subject properties 5. A copy of the assessors map with the subject property outlined in red 6. A check in the amount of $545.00 made payable to the Metropolitan Boundary Commission which represents the application fee The Japanese International Baptist Church also owns Tax Lot 4400 which is contiguous to Tax Lot 701. Tax Lot •4400 is within the city limits of the City of Tigard. AOL r P.O. Box 22,791 • Mlhvaulde, OR 97269 15345 S.E. 62nd Drive • Suite 200 • Clackamas, OR 97015 Office (503) 655-2971 • Fax (503) 655-5495 MINE City of Tigard Page 2 October 19, 1993 Please advise this office if any additional information is required. Sincerely, DENAL ENGINEERING,` INC. Jl~/Karnisch, P. E. President LJH : LAYS : rsh cc: Japanese International Baptist Church Leslie Ann Hauer, Planning Consultant Attachments as noted ab ve Mill 111:1 Lv Ward Rader, Chairman Citizens Participation Organ 4-M 7617 SW Cedercrest 1*7 Portland, Oregon 97223 January 25, 19994 City Council City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: File #ZCA 93-0003 Zone Change Application for annexation of 2 parcels of 1.89 acres--tax lots 701 & 79,0 Dear Council: In response to the Notice of Public Hearing on the application before you for an annexation and zone change, CPO 4-M at its January 19, 1994 meeting discussed the application file #93-0003 of tax lot 701 and 790 for the Japanese International Baptist Church by Denali Engineering, Inc. As it is understood, the application is for annexation of said property from unincorporated Washington County to the City of Tigard. The application does not include any portion of SW Spruce Street or adjacent properties to said parcels. Much of the land being considered for annexation is designated "Sensitive Habitat" identified by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Audubon Socity Urban Wildlife Habitate Map and forested areas coincidental with water areas and wetlands. The area is part of the Ash Creek system--Ash Brook. Much of it is identified as ASC.15--Area of Special Concern, 1984. (Please refer to map, ie.... Ash Brook that is near SW Spruce and SW 78th through the Phaffle Area and near Steve Street to Hall Blvd. It flow to ASC 8 wetland} CPO 4-M is not supportive of piece-meal annexation, however, as indicated by the applicants their goals are to utilize the subject parcels by utilizing one instead of two local governmental processes with minimal impact to the surrounding residential community. We are of the understanding that the zone application is for R-7 which is compatible with the current zone and that the current City of Tigard rules and regs regarding sensitive habitat and wildlife habitat can address protection of the sensitive lands within the designated area regarding future development. We request that if .the annexation is approved that the zoning not be of greater density than the R-7 designation to compliment and fit in with the surrounding residential and sensitive lands community and that no other land be included with the said annexation. Traffic flow evo Wing from development of said property should not impact residential areas as the parcels are near SW ball Blvd. via SW Spruce and via SW 85th & Pine. Thank you for allowing us to enter our testimony into the record. ARE III I ~I SIGNIFICANT NATURAL RESOURCES t ihii rs a generalrard description if tho significant I~ "111 oat . u matim c.mce ning each I r S~ E.., iAa nti lied revwrcr i, availatsle Iran 11M s'lath.rytton I ~l m Cormtr LFpartmrnt of Land Usr and Transpnrtatum, -\!t 1 ~ ibllshnn, Ow•grm. i \ IJ , ~ - •pl WATER AREAS AND WETLANDS H M, _ lUU v,•ar Ihwl plain, drainage h.ri rd QIY OF, 9FAVFAt I1 ~I I i is rat ad pmw1,, rtteFit in t a A-ii WILDLIFE HABITAT _ Ii xnsrti a l,ahitats ido•ntihedby the I- rrgon Urparbnrnt f Fish and Wildlife, (l the tiMJ,on $Mieiy Vrhan i 00,11 a 11 ,17 ~j '1 I whilst M. -and IoresteA arras ti c idrntat with water areas and swtlandi. r'~ v WATER AREAS AND WETLANDS ::j' b FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT ? ! I ;i .L -1 ,II.. 1 I jam` i I .1 h are also Water areas and wetland, car Fish anJ wildlife hal !at. OPEN SPACE [lifting parks, recreation suet, RnIF cmrws c 1 s chni plaYR rn,ndf, 1 i I.=j r 1) i f^77~g pswe Irm• RMS I , anal Iin- 1 \ yin L L f~`51 pan filet ed try IN-' IualaM1. ildh ~I. y..~ Pail an.l Recn an.m U.,-- ` I I IG-.'' E ~~il fI , SCENIC RESOURCES - Il \ 7 L' E SC ItiIC F:l K1T CS Rn ,dentihrJ crllrnt «rnit road, s an,, their srnnms nl gr sonic roads ,d,.ch \ 'If nrrrr a vr,ta of IN- lu.,latin Valley \ i r IN- C.-ad, $l:t\IC VIEWS New!r,int, prnmJrtrg a / v ,:a of tM tuatatin VaurY. 'c 1~- Cr«.rfr ~.,nuntamt. n ntl+rr « teat~rrt. l i1 1 w , - SCEVIt' Fl1TURL5 LanA form,. ,*RrtaU.m I J NORTH nr ,.a[er tnur,e, with aevM•!~c sal,x• to ~ tM wrrnrt,Amg aria. ` ALE - I II spp r. n PARK DEFICIENT AREA SC an•. r Ih.m I!! mde Non a pan si ~F=Y OF T,faVO .v. r.+r.' nr a p,d,tic «hmi plaYR ruunAn 1 inch t•cudk tali. 2 • ax) feet I I~ v II ywed 4-a a bq~ I tLf Agenda Item No. 1-7 For Agenda of January 25, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Vacation of a Portion of SW 79th Avenue, an unnamed 20 foot wide right-of-way and th subdivision plat Twin Oaks Lane. PREPARED BY: Will D'Andrea DEPT HEAD OR CITY ADMIN OK ISSUE BEFORE THE CO OCI Should the City Council vacate: 1) a portion of SW 79th Avenue, beginning with the intersection of SW 79th Avenue and SW Pacific Highway and continuing to the southeast terminus of SW 79th Avenue, and 2) the subdivision plat Twin Oaks Lane recorded in Plat Book 12 Page 18 Washington County Records, and 3) an unnamed 20 foot wide right-of-way located immediately to the east of SW 79th .Avenue. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve this-vacation------------- ash INFORMATION SUMMARY Council initiated this vacation (Vicinity map; Exhibit A) at a public meeting held on November 23, 1993 (Res. 93-59; Exhibit B). Hal Keever.., the petitioner, requests City Council approval to vacate a portion of SW 79th Avenue, an unnamed 20 foot wide right- of-way and the subdivision plat Twin Oaks Lane. The petitioner has stated that this vacation is needed as part of a lot consolidation process being undertaken to develop a site for a Costco Wholesale store. The present owners of the parcels along SW 79th Avenue have given the petitioner permission to act as agent for them in this vacation process and the associated development of the Costco site. On December 8, 1993, the Planning Commission approved with conditions a Site Development Review/Planned Development approval (SDR 93-0018/PDR 93-0010) of a Costco Wholesale store. Condition 01 of that approval required the vacation of existing easements. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Take no action at this time. FISCAL NOTES All fees have been paid by the applicant. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE VACATION OF: 1) A PORTION OF SW 79TH AVENUE, BEGINNING WITH THE INTERSECTION OF SW 79TH AVENUE AND SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND CONTINUING TO THE SOUTHEAST TERMINUS OF SW 79TFI AVENUE, 2) THE SUBDIVISION PLAT TWIN OAKS LANE RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 12 PAGE 18 WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDS, AND 3) AN, UNNAMED 20 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST OF SW 79TH AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code on November 23, 1993; and WHEREAS, this portion of SW 79th Avenue is a dedicated public right-of-way, giving the public rights over the land for street and utility improvements; and WHEREAS, the purpose for this vacation is to vacate a portion of SW 79th Avenue that is no longer needed for public use and because all abutting tax. lots have been consolidated; and WHEREAS, this 20 foot wide roadway is a dedicated public right-of- way for the subdivision plat Palmer Acres; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this vacation is to vacate the 20 foot rigit=of-way for the subdivision plat Palmer Acres that is no Aim longer needed because all abutting tax lots have been consolidated; and WHEREAS, this subdivision plat Twin Oaks Lane is a legally recorded subdivision plat, Book 12 Page 18 Washington County Records; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this vacation is to vacate the subdivision plat Twin Oaks Lane that is no longer needed because of a lot consolidation in conjunction with the development of a Costco Wholesale store; and WHEREAS, the adjacent properties support this vacation; and WHEREAS, the vacation has been initiated by the City Council and approval has been recommended by the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, all affected service providers, including utility companies and emergency service providers, have reviewed the vacation proposal and have no objections; and WHEREAS,. notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all property owners in the affected area, as described by ORS 271.080; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Tigard Municipal. Code 15.08.040, the Recorder posted notice in the area to be vacated and published notice of the public hearing; and ORDINANCE No. 94- Page 1 r WHEREAS, the property owners of the majority of the area affected have not objected in writing; and WHEREAS, the City Council having considered the request on November 23, 1993, finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate that certain portion of SW 79th Avenue, an unnamed 20 foot wide right-of-way, and subdivision plat Twin Oaks Dane b-acause the public interest will not be prejudiced by this vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and'TAIC section 15.08.130. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1:, The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that certain portion of SW 79th Avenue, an unname.4 20 foot wide right-of-way, and subdivision plat Twin Oaks Lane as shown and described on the attached exhibit A (map and legal description of area to be vacated) and by this reference made part there of. `^'`v ' • This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its VJJl.i11V6. . - passage by, the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1994. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of , 1994. Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 94- Page 2 a - ST. S.{~. vi as Lk FL£ as u Y Us Q s, 7.31 yes re. ~ ~ -r0 g t' a st r-g6A j SVr DUVAf.L a`TREET i it I s ® ``79-rcT~g9i1TIi PARK i 287 ~ ~ . I z ~-l - s a HEF40So L - -~rAv - Yt 1 1 ELEMENTARY A 1.. 1 0 MEN s. r . EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION FOR VACATION OF 79TH AVENUE (TWIN OAKS LANE) A tract of land situated in the Southeast one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 36 Township 1 South, Range 1 West° Willamette Meridian, Washington County;. Oregon, described as follow: Commencing at the 2 inch iron pipe set at the initial point of the Plat of Twin Oaks Lane, Recorded in Book 12. Page 18 of the Washington County Plat Records; thence N 900 001, 0011 E a distance of, 321.86 feet to the southeast corner of said plat; thence N 010 441 4011 W along the east line of said plat a distance of 142.19 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S 741 001 3011 W a distance of 133.51 feet to the point of curve; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 72.00 feet and a delta of 1130 231 3011 (chord which bears N 490 171 4511 W, 120.45 feet) a distance of 142.49 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 070 24° 0011 E a distance of 71.68 feet; thence N 160 041 2011 E a distance of 94.00 feet, to the point of curve; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 250.00 feet a delta of 360 371 0011 (a chord which bears N 020 141 1011 W, 157.06 feet) a distance of 159.77 feet, to the point of tangency; thence N 200 321 40" W a distance of 57.00 feet, to a point of curve; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 169.00 feet and a delta of 360 521 00" (a chord which bears N 020 0614011 W, 106.88 feet) a distance of 108.76 feet, to a point of tangency; thence N 161 191 2011 E a distance of 88.00 feet to a point of curve; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 70.00 feet and a delta of 130 061 4511(a chord which bears N 090 451 5711 E, 15.98 feet) to a point of compound curve; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 15.00 feet and a delta of 1320 46° 2411 ( a chord which bears N 610 171 2811 W, 27.49 feet) a distance of 34.76 feet to the southerly right of way of Pacific Highway 99W; thence N 520 191 2011 E, along said right of way a distance of 84.47 feet to a point of curve; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 15.00 feet and a delta of 741 31° 2211 ( a chord which bears S 151 031 3911 W, 18.16 feet) a distance of 19.51 feet, to a point of reverse curve; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 120.00 feet and a delta of 380 311 5311 (with a chord which bears S 020 561 36" E, 79.19 feet) a distance of 80.70 feet, to a point of tangency; thence S 160 191 2011 W a distance of 88.00 feet to the point of curve; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 119.00 feet and a delta of 36° 521 0011 (a chord which bears S 020 061 4001 E, 75.26 feet) a distance of 76.56 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 20° 321 4011 E a distance of 57.00 feet to a point of curve; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 300.00 feet and a delta of 361 371 0011 (a chord which bears S 020 141 1011 E, 188.48 feet) a distance of 191.72 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 160 041 2011 W a distance of. 94.00 feet to a point of curve: thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 32.00 feet and a delta of 880 211 5011 (a chord which I 'son I T=1 a bears S 281 061-3511 E, 44.60 feet) a distance of 49.35 feet to a point of, reversing curve; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 212.64 feet and a delta of 130 36' 00" (a chord which bears S 650 29" 30" E, 50.35 feet) a distance of 50.47 feet to a point of reversing curve; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 42.00 feet.a delta of 470 18' 00" (a chord which bears S 820 20' 30" E, 33.70 feet) a distance of 38.70 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 740 00' 30" E a distance of 62.90 feet to the easterly line of the plat of Twin Oaks Lane; thence S 010 441 40" E a distance of 51.59 feet to the true point of beginning. johnrh\twinoak.des i v EXHIBIT A AOL DESCRIPTION OF ROAD WAY TO BE VACATED A tract of land situated in southeast one-quarter of the southwest one-quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of lot 8 Palmer Acres Recorded in Book 3 page 26 of the Washington County Plat Records; thence N 01° 12' 0011 W, along the west line of Palmer Acres, a distance of 1689.95 feet to the southerly right-of-way of Pacific Highway 99W; thence N 540 39' 30" E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 24.16 feet, to the most westerly northwest corner of lot 1 Palmer Acres; thence S 010 12' 0011 E along the westerly lines of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Palmer Acres, a distance of 1701.50 feet, to the southwest corner of lot 7 Palmer'Acres; thence N 82° 42' 00" W a distance of 20.22 feet to the point of beginning. SOHNRH\PALMER. VAC - r i y . EX1416317 Adak, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 93-4 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE VACATION OF: 1) A PORTION OF SW 79TH AVENUE, BEGINNING WITH THE INTERSECTION OF SW 79TH AND SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND CONTINUING TO THE SOUTHEAST TERMINUS OF SW 79TH AVENUE, AND 2) THE SUBDIVISION PLAT OF TWIN OAKS LANE RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR 12 PAGE 18 WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDS, AND 3) AN UNNAMED 20, WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST OF SW 79TH AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. WHERES.S this portion. of SW 79th Avenue is a dedicated mnhlie- r---- right-of-way, giving the public rights over the land for street and utility improvements; and WHEREAS, SW 79th Avenue, in the vicinity of the area proposed for vacation is no longer needed; and WHEREAS, the property owner(s) will be required to provide easement(s) for access and any utilities located within the area proposed for vacation; and WHEREAS, the recorded plat of 'Gain Oaks Lane is no longer needed; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds it necessary and desirable to initiate vacation proceedings for said right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that., (1) The Tigard City Council initiates a vacation request of a public right-of-way and subdivision plat, and with the understanding that those property owners who would normally sign a petition shall be notified by mail of the proceedings; and (2) A public hearing is hereby called to be held by the City Council on Tuesday, January 25, 1993, at 7:30 PM at the Tigard Civic Center Town Hall Room, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, within the City of Tigard, at which time and place the Council shall hear any objections thereto, and any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacating of said fright-of-way; and RESOLUTION NO. 93- 5G, Page' 1 r Jill (3) The City Recorder be, and she is hereby, authorized and directed to cause to have published in the Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Tigard hereby designated for such purpose, a notice of said hearing in the form hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof, the first publication to be January 13, 1993 and the final publication to be on January 20, 1993. The recorder be, and she is hereby, further directed to cause to.have posted within five (5) days after the date of first publication, a copy of said notice at or near each end of the area proposed to be vacated; and (4) That the particular portion of granted public right-of-way to be vacated is shown on the attached sheet labeled. Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part thereof. PASSED: This day of D VF,r , 1993. ATTEST: City of Tagar n 6 t P-q-esr d e~- GJl cc ~y1. Le U111 -k City Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 93-5 "ji Page 2