The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 05/12/1992 A r va ll I Or 1IVARIJ ' OREGON Sp • ! F AGENDA F PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up M c sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. 6:30 • STUDY SESSION (6:30 PM) 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING (7:30 PM) 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 2. PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL POLICE WEEK; MAY 11 - 15, 1992. • Mayor Edwards 7:40 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 7:50 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes: April 14, 16, and 21, 1992 4.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar 4.3 Authorize Acquisition of Right of Way for 109th Avenue Extension-Resolution No. 92- 21 4.4 Appropriate Grant Awards for Park Improvements - Resolution No. 92- 22 4.5 Local Contract Review Board: a. Authorize Bid Advertisement for Main Street Drainage Capital Improvement Project b. Award Bid for the Pavement Major Maintenance Program Overlay to Morse Brothers, Inc. C. Award Bid for the Sattler Street Reconstruction to Eagle/Eisner, Inc. COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE I t 7•_r_r, 5. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT- CPA 92-0001 ZONE CHANGE IN i ZON 92-0001; ROBINSON (NPO 7). A request for Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change gem approval to allow redesignation of a 2.55 acre site from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and zone change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning goals 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, and 13; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4., 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.2, and 12.1.1; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 and 18.32. LOCATION: 10330 SW Scholls Ferry Road (WCTM 1S1 34AB, tax lot 3300) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report - Community Development Staff d. Public Testimony -NPO7 - Proponents (favoring the amendment) - Opponents (opposing the amendment) e. Staff Recommendation f. Council Questions/Comments g. Public Hearing Closed h. Council Consideration: Motion Directing Staff to Prepare Final Order 8:25 6. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAIN AMENDMENT CPA 92-0002 ANDERSON (NPO 3). A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to redesignate a 7.73 acre site from Professional Commercial and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, & 13; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, 9.1.3, and 12.1.1; Community Development Code Chapter 18.22. LOCATION: South side of Bull Mountain Road, between 500 and 1100 feet west of Pacific Highway. (WCTM 2S1 10AC, tax lots 1300 and 1400, and 2S1 101313, tax lots 1600 and 2100) ZONE: Washington County's R-6 Zone (Residential, 6 units/acre) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges C. Staff Report - Community Development Staff d. Public Testimony -NPO3 - Proponents (favoring the amendment) - Opponents (opposing the amendment) e. Staff Recommendation f. Council Questions/Comments g. Public Hearing Closed h. Council Consideration: Motion Directing Staff to Prepare Final Order 9:10 7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 2 i i a ,i. s i 9:20 8. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW/UPDATE • City Administrator 9:30 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 10:00 10. ADJOURNMENT =0512.92 f 4 't F :I I F i ~ 1 i f , COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 3 , i I MEN= z Council Agenda Item 3.1 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MEETING MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 • Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Edwards. 1. ROLL CALL Council Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Judy Fessler, Valerie Johnson (arrived at 6:50 p.m.), and Joe Kasten. Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; John Acker, Associate Planner; Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Community Relations Coordinator; Mike Robinson, Legal Counsel; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. STUDY SESSION • REGION 2040 WORKSHOP Planning Commission Present: President Milt Fyre; Commissioners Vlasta Barber, James Castile, Brian Moore, Harry Sapporta, and Jack Schwab. Community Development Director facilitated discussion with the Council and Planning commission on the Region 2040 planning effort initiated by Metro. The purpose of the session was to comment on the values held concerning the metropolitan area; that is, what should it look like and possible options for development patterns. After discussion, Community Development Director distributed questionnaires to the elected and appointed officials and requested that they complete and return them. This represents the first stage. There will be public workshops and hearings later, with a second stage effort next year. • RV FRONT YARD STORAGE City Administrator reported that Mr. Rick Perkins contacted City Hall concerning the RV front yard storage provisions in the Code. Mr. Perkins is soliciting support for a renewed look at this portion of the Code and has suggested a workshop format with the Council. After brief discussion, Council agreed that Mr. Perkins should submit the issue to the Council during the Visitor's Agenda portion of a Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 1 LaRosa= :E • METROPOLITZ01 P.P.E-x Ce..MUNICWTVIGAI S COMUSSIOM City Administrator advised that as a cost saving measure, MACC is considering a recommendation to close the TVCA South Center facility. The facility, located on SW 85th across from the Unified Sewerage Agency, is used by Tualatin Valley Community Access as a training and production facility. If South Center is closed, equipment and personnel would be relocated to an expanded facility at VIACC headquarters in Aloha. The expanded facility would allow for more studio space and expanded production capabilities. The transfer of staff would allow the expanded facility to be open longer hours than either facility is open now. MACC would like to make a decision on this at their May 20 E meeting to coincide with lease negotiations at the Aloha site. After brief discussion, council indicated no problem with whatever decision MACC makes on this issue. • UPDATE ON BULL MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT (SEXYU PROPERTY) On April 28, during the Council's Visitor's Agenda, Mr. Larry Westerman noted problems relating to the above-referenced property. City Engineer advised Council that a letter had been sent to the developer requesting that the problems be addressed. Council will receive a synopsis of issues in their newsletter. It was suggested that the synopsis be forwarded to NPO 3 as well. BUSINESS MEETING 2. PROCLANATIONS - Mayor Edwards declared the following proclamations: - National Police Week; May 11 - 15, 1992 - Emergency Medical Services Week - May 10-16, 1992 3. VISITOR'S AGEMDA • Mr. Gary Heintz advised Council that a number of residents would like Council to consider a pathway connecting Eden Court to 107th Court. Such a path would solve a number of problems enumerated by Mr. Heintz. He referred to a previous Park Board meeting (1987/88) where this pathway was discussed. f This issue will be on the next Park Board meeting agenda. i CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 2 i f I I 4. CONSENT AGENDA: Motion by Councilor Kasten, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: i 4.1 Approve Council Minutes: April 14, 16, and 21, 1992 4.2 Receive and File: Council Calendar 4.3 Authorize Acquisition of Right of Way for 109th Avenue Extension-Resolution No. 92-21 4.4 Appropriate Grant Awards for Park Improvements - Resolution No. 92-22 4.5 Local Contract Review Board: a. Authorize Bid Advertisement for Main Street Drainage Capital Improvement Project b. Award Bid for the Pavement Major Maintenance Program Overlay to Morse Brothers, Inc. c. Award Bid for the Sattler Street Reconstruction to j Eagle/Elsner, Inc. Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. a 5. PUBLIC EMARTNG - COINPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - CPA 92-0001 ' ZONE CHANGE ZON 92-0001; ROBINSON LNPO 7). A request for Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to allow redesignation of a 2.55 acre site from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and zone change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning goals 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, and 13; Comprehensive Plan i Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.4.4., 7.6.1, j 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.2, and 12.1.1; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 and 18.32. LOCATION: 10330 SW Scholls Ferry Road (WCTM 1S1 34AB, tax lot 3300) a. Public hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. C. Senior Planner Bewersdorff summarized the Staff Report as submitted to the Council in their meeting packet. Staff recommended denial of the CPA. d. Public Testimony: • Cal Woolery, Chair of NPO 7, 12356 S.W. 132nd Court, Tigard OR 97223, reviewed the NPO's comments. NPO 7 believes the current zoning is proper. The requested zone change and resulting increase in density would not be compatible with the adjacent park. In addition, there were concerns about the ' traffic impact. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAX 12, 1992 - PAGE 3 i A 1 1: IRA Proponents: • Rick Givens, 6564 S.E. Lake Road, Milwaukie OR testified listing the following points favoring the proposed CPA: 1. Criteria for a zone change is very subjective. At what magnitude must change occur before a comprehensive plan amendment is allowed? 2. A number of changes have occurred with the surrounding area, including density of residential development as well as commercial development. 3. The adjacent park provides a buffer area. In fact, the site is abutted on all sides by the park and multi-family development. 4. The site will probably not be developed at R- 25, but at a lower density. 5. Transit is readily available. 6. Applicant would be agreeable to providing a traffic study. He noted the current State Transportation Department activity in the area with regards to improvements to Scholls Ferry Road. Council asked clarifying questions of Mr., Givens about the density and transportation. Mr. Givens advised that he expects that 18 units per acre to be the maximum feasible at this site. Preliminary tran~sportation projections indicate that the intersection is capable of handling this development. Opponents • Greg Hahn, 11475 S.W. Hazelwood Loop, Tigard, OR 97223, advised that he testified before the Planning Conmission in opposition to the CPA. (See written testimony from Mr. Hahn on file with the packet meeting material.) Concerns listed included; 1. There was not sufficient documentation to show that a change in circumstance had occurred. 2. There was no study concerning traffic impacts. 3. The increase from 12 to 25 units per acre was "out of step" with the surrounding area. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 4 IBM iil!illliii 4. Of 31 people contacted in Englewood area, all were opposed to the CPA. Additional testimony: Mayor Edwards allowed testimony from Sam Gotter who arrived too late to sign in on the testimony sheet: Sam Gotter, Hillsboro, Oregon listed the following points in support of the CPA: 1. The nearby single-family homes would be sufficiently buffered. 2. Scholls Ferry Road was being widened to four lanes with a traffic light as an entrance. 3. This area was suited for R-25 and substantial change has occurred. e. Staff response Senior Planner Bewersdorff advised: 1. Growth had occurred, but the growth had been anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. In response to a question from Councilor Fessler, 33 additional units would be possible if the site was i zoned R-25. f. Public hearing was closed. g. Each Council member present commented on the proposed CPA. Councilor Fessler advised she would vote to deny at this time citing concerns with transportation logistics not fully addressed. Councilor Johnson referred to the preceding public process (i.e., NPO review and the Planning Commission hearing) and advised that she would align with their recommendation to deny. She noted the Site Development Review process which can.be used to address specific problems. Councilor Kasten advised he was in agreement with Councilor Johnson's comments. Mayor Edwards noted he was not persuaded that the traffic impact was so great that the developer's proposal was not justified. h. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to deny CPA 92-001 as requested. The motion was approved by a majority vote of Council present (3-1); Mayor Edwards voted "No." CITY COUNCIL MEETING- MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 5 6. PUBLIC HEARING - Cg!aREH]ENSIVE PLAN ANENDPWNT CPA 92-0002 ANDERSON (NPO 3). A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to redesignate a 7.73 acre site from Professional Comnercial and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, & 13; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, 9.1.3, and 12.1.1; Community Development Code Chapter 18.22. LOCATION: South side of Bull Mountain Road, between 500 and 1100 feet west of Pacific Highway. (WCTM 2S1 10AC, tax lots 1300 and 1400, and 2S1 10BD, tax lots 1600 and 2100) ZONE: Washington County°s R-6 Zone (Residential, 6 units/acre) Public hearing was continued to June 9, 1992. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled. 8. ADJOURNAENT: 8:20 p.m. CCU-~.. L Catherine Wheatley, City Recor er At es or, 1t of a rd 4Date: =0512.92 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 - PAGE 6 t COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal 0 Notice TT 7258 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising The following meeting highlights arelpublished for your uifotmi Lion Fall • City of Tigard ® ❑ Tearsheet Notii. agendas may br obtained froinAhe City 9ecorder,,1 125 S W Hall- P.O. Box 23397 Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 972231 by calling 639417,1:,. • Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affide COUNCILI BUSINESS MEETING MAY 1Z 1992 ® • TiGARD CITY HALL ' TOWNRAI - 13125 SW HALL, 90MVAPM TIGARD, Q1tEGORt Study Sesszo»' (Town 1iall Conference R©ontj (6.3©P.i r (7:3D P M.) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Business Meeting (Itivm ]Hall) STATE OF OREGON, as. LocA1 Cc it ct Review Board COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) I, T„ate + uo iPx Public Hesi+stgs being first duly sworn, depose and say that l ark the Advertising ®.Comprehenstve-Plan Amendment Robinson, lLocation :10330 Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tig_arcl 'l'imes 5 W:.SCt1011s Ferry Road ('l ~5 BCreS); Zane Char A proval a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 sought to allow change from R 12 (Resideuilal 12 uniwaacre) to acre R 25 (Resideritiai 25 units/ and 193.020; published a in the ) aforesaid county and state; that he ' -ate i dii Business McPt; ng c Comprehensive Pla*i Amendment - Anderson; L ovations South side ofAButfl ]ountat~i lZoad; between 500 and:1100 feetwest cif a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 'pacificHiihaiay.(713_'acres);,ZoneChaaga Approvalsoug4tto entire issue of said newspaper for one successive and ,4dlow:change,from 1'rofesSioital'.Coniinercial'and Lqw. TBensity consecutive in the following issues: ,Residertiial to medium High Density Resicientud. May 7, 1992 Executive Session The'figard City Council may goutto Executive Ses . ston:under tho'.provisions of nRS 192:f60 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to,discuss "lransacaons, current and pending litigateon . labor relations; real pro- . petty: issues. r e4 l TT7258 = Publish May .7;1992: Subscribed and sworn t efore me this -7rinir of Ma- 1992 zli C// V Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT i IM: jil i 1 10 i COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0:160 Notice Tr 7252 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising P,~TELIC .ARIiaG City of Tigard ® ❑ Tearsheet Notic TheJollowmg will be considered by#ie Ttga d City Council ari Ma 12, P.O. Box 23397 1992; at 7.30 P M at Ti ard.Caty Center, Town l Is1l Roorn, -k25 aW ® Tigard, OR 97223 Ball lloulevard, T><gard; Oregon. Further xdfordn4. ' . maybe obta~neif s' a ❑ Duplicate Affida fmni the Commun> ty. Development Direcwr or;Cz<ty It~corder it t11~ Stile anrited to subrsut w~t#°n tes~ location or liy,call3ng 639-4171 Yoltare e Un~opy zn advance of.the~pubt~c bet(ring, wntten and oral fegpi~ora will bei"%nm red at tf :'he~rru . T lautill welt I ii i 21axll~ Iigaid ia~3r cardalt'cot iith ~te'agpttcltbb( i 81 and m- y rules of procedure adapte by the Council and avai b AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION GQh;IPRI?i rrSiv> PLAN' MFrtDM riri C>=A92JiiD ZONE ~`L9? f~l) itOBIRSON , #t STATE OF OREGON, )ss --~HANGI; ' COUNTY OF WASHINGTON,) A.4egiiest for Cofslprehens <ve I'lan;aiid Zane, Change approval to m"Idav redesignat[fla Of a 2:55 acres>.te from Medium )7enity,Residenttal Ic, i, hiclith Koehl Pr Medium High Density Restdental and rl.zone dkatsge from R, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising (Residenf~a1,12units/scre~ to R 2S'_(Resaentaal, 25 tints/aceej A Director, or his principal clerk, of the- e - Pi:ICABLfi ItENlIi11T CEdTTEItIA. Stat$v~}de P:arsnmg-C~ls 1;^2,310; a newspaper of general circulation as fined in ORS 193.010 12;`rtd'23; Comprchensiv Flan IbliCaes 1. l'1, 2 I 1 , 6.6A , ? and 193.020; Published a in the 7 4:4, 7 61;,8 I.r, 8 13, $ ~:41,2; and 12,1 1, Cofnmunbtyl3rvel p aforesaid county and state; that he mean Code.Chaptcrs :1$.2 aild 1832 10ClT103 10331) SW S~I~ttIls • Ferry Road (WCTIVI t5134A1, talc t®t 33U0) a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for o~-successive and COMPREHENSIVE P3 ~~i/~ENnMIEr~T~~I~~~~i3~2 AATI2 f consecutive in the following issues: A.rtrquest for Comreltier+sa~e.;Plan Map Amendment approval Pxt hate a 7.73 Afire site from Professional Caramencial':ati L -w'13ensitl+ April 30, 1992 Residenttal`to Medium Htglt lSen~sty Resttittal AI'PLICALE A' PROVAl; CRITERIA: Statewide Plazin;ing Goals 1, 2, 9,10,11;.12, a&=~3, ' Cotnpretdensve Plaii`:I~l;cies'1 12, 2I I, ti ll, 7 i,2 _76.1,.$:1,1,.8.2:2, 9.1.1, 9 13,`,& 12.1;1, Cominunety_Development f~tu;e Ctpap~r 1$: I:OCATIQP~T% South side of Bull Moethta>!n'Rcad. bettveatt`500I~nd 11;0 fect:west of Pacr6c ~IigirwaY ('WGTINL 2$1IOAC, talc hats 13(~.~nd >;4fsa, and2S1 IOBD; ta..lots 1600 and 21(10) ~QI~~ 13~a$fringtbn~County's Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30, day of April 1992 R 6;Lone (I:esidential, d ~m~s%acre), z ly Mini 3092 TT7252 -ir sV115 I Notary Public for Oregon NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON COMMISSION NO.OW352 any Commission Expires: 9~.eK /S, 15?4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 15. AFFIDAVIT 111 in, 11 t AGENDA ITEM NO. - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE: j x (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. STAFF ' NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC CONTACTED P0 Ill l ~ SaH o 71 ;tee ~y 09 o g o~.E mum C- Depending on the number of person wishing to testify, the Chair of the Council may limit the amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. Please sign in to testify on the following: AGENDA ITEM NO. ;-.S. DATE: May PLEASE PRIM ~Prd-po"nent ' 4~pe~Icing In Favor of apponent {Speaking Against Correprehsnsi e Comprehensive :?fan Amendment CPd Plap Amendment CPA 92-0001' Zo, a Chang X30 .=Zor 'Ch, ge. ZC1 ! 92-00f)1; R0bi.1 on) ZC 99 =±f 09;':l obirist n Name Name Address Address Name Name y Address Address 1 75 Z - V)QQ C Name Name Address Address Name Name , Address Address Name Name Address Address Namo Name Address Address Rom f Y' 4Z Depending on the number of person wishing roestify, the Cha el Depending of the Council may limit the amount f of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes. The Chair may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated by the Council to supplement oral testimony. Please sign in to testify on the following: AGENDA ITEM NO tt ~ A DATE: IVlV2;i"19W PLEASE PRINT Proponent - (Speektrgg Ire Para f xOX f, Opponent ' (Speaking Against Comprehensive Comprehpnsnee`~? # A~'Ce~rr~ntN J2~21 Plsin'~nel nd'ment CPA 92-0002 - Anderson) N J - Antlerson)'7 . ame Name Address Address Name Name Sh•,rl ~ia Address Address 1520 Sw FuVla~d ' agi Name ame Address Address, Name Name LW Address Addrossl Name Name Address Address Name ma Ha Address Address Name Name Address Address Name Name Address dress j Name Name I{ Address Address i 1 C MEMORANDUM CITY OF•TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council and Planning Commission FROM: Ed Murphy, Director of Community Developmen DATE: May 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Region 2040 Workshop- We have scheduled a joint session between the Planning Commission and City Council on May 12th, between 6-:30 and 7:30 p.m., to begin taking a look at the metropolitan region for the next 50 years. This session is to comment on the values you hold concerning what you want the metropolitan area ought to be like in the future, and to begin to look at some possible options for development patterns. This project is being headed by METRO, and is being done in a partnership fashion with the local jurisdictions. The result may influence any changes in the Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives (RUGGO • s) , and may be the basis for "functional planning efforts" in transportation, parks, economic development, housing or other issues. Our city has a lot at stake in this process, and your viewpoints are critical. This is the first stage there will be public workshops and hearings later, plus a whole second stage effort next year. However, the foundation is being laid now, so it is important to participate now. During the hour, we will watch a slide show, have some discussion on a couple of key issues, and hand out a questionnaire for you to fill out later. Just to give you a head start, I am enclosing some material for your review ahead of the meeting to give you a sense of the subject matter. This is a good chance for us to do some longer term thinking and discussion about our community future. I hope you will be able to participate. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. e!m/2040.Hel i i Raw- f. .:;ia. "a+ .;,i y~, 4g~',t~•. ..w,a~.!:1{iy.~~ ~(~~~•~~.~R.•'y~•g~~j~+~i7~p'~j~iAj~ WHIN, Z:l••} .=a~.zi~ 3167$•~R~JC~°, 1.7R'A"1Ld'Jj~IJLY~i7~+Y e -'1 '9.• _?,N• .S?' .w•f%•• ~.r.r,};~~±~; ~,.1i...f{• ,r~~;c.iv, lyrX• r ' CdrJ. 4Y.~.,!: f.. i• •ia•i~ ~ ` - a'•~:_';y_.. .y}r..ft•.:c:' L As you-na b~ 'avvar~p Me o tiateui~l =the p"'9o g~~eypff~oy~ tyto " T ~ytj °p ~y~1 : •:,1. 1. . ' .lrr:•JJ< -•1' ~:~-•:rk''•'bdlC •1 j+.t: '!ri.Y1~'~ JtlC. C• _ .r..:. N1~ tropitan Sao F «~:;.;er®i~side tli.•fuofie e ami ne o . throughout 'the' regom~ie asss gt®yvttrffort~ f"Ifird ► R :.`yam k f••: A _ ...C'. :^.:..4 T1 1.`^';}...C:.. Pe~oPley,as possible: and;'°Jesnxq ;~vz**1d(%ligihd-~regaon ~govea~um ~t • < " Of~1C1a1S_a hanW ~ 'y": '~...t•r+j R~{~..-7. 'r"'r.i • + '.I ` 3•y ~ ; '~•'p: i~ .ki •,o., y~~,. ; I dtV t %r' ~ may, 4Y ~p 7T! ~y 1r. + 't~1 V:. rovyde'oin Yt ?44e ~OibW~:~ * Y DV a. ...:v:. •'x`:.. : r!,~:•t::£t%3:)rft!?ilY : ~a~!'x.'~kJ,'f"^,;LyF; l7"wt;`;'yJ:.< ,:y, • 3iti" This effort is called Region:2040•b~..bi ause; 1 < a L` ook.;5®y~ uito the'_~iiture to ,~r.•.~ eew., Y ded#to the year 2Ph as 040. the Regioii%200 effort?has, b ~ . 4 1 -1 fir. i 9✓3 S; p e, f~vIu ch isnow'u~de~iay,~ and; ~vv~llY basesbe~cbm~ile an t ip•rd~ecemb at r y~e~';('T.we5"•q{'.=e `e <it4~ ik e't"h'.w.rs;• y :y;;~ ral-..rob 'ab :thre~. ..•r 5 -p z ..a will' iesult' seve tb~.ss_alteratYetuare~'scenar~os'Pse~~~' ~t•.::- 't iWP-2 ` u' y• -'irt 'i... '°'.w.`i;Rq•a,;••~-; '*r ^,.r tlie*I2egion-~20 0eff or.-t;4sche~tli.tIMIT. 31 easurg, e°eff ~ s•~ .F~i~~hR+?5~.;;'^~..:-,~S o4 acid costs •associat p ar<deadto~ electaon. of. ~Regiozb204Q:f ••4-•'+~ '"rJ'?•,. f.' '7 ya i u,. wJ:t'4.::i-~'v%,(. L F,•.•- ~•;:~t`-;i - .N", '4 S; C''>:k7.'. aL~rs?. ..r.:..'J.::; /•'.z:. .r. i..+_. S~' r' preferred alfQ „rnati~!e:. . ~s~ 7 ,a , , • . ',fit l : . ,F., ?"k))~ r raj "r• ,r py+. y .t ,rJ,iy'a~•.r::, f ,~~•'~r.. •~r'•~::T;y!~'Q ~ a. e 7:• _ i~`1,=~ ,i ,S :1- <1 . ,ct. [1gr, "a^Ty~;''a !-.''1 ~'"'3~'+z•~f t.`•,J'F.:::~:ar: y 0~ffi • r..;°`- *ir.''% i~``•ayl'`3s,R+''SrI'ii?c„',-s~rt:S+f`~v:fi',4`a'~ • r ''~{;"'s.4:•+i.5<.n'%~4.. ensure ubhc.;valuPS;ab®ut an. owth a andoffitsa~n~ple vieyof?i rn r. tar 42. a t, ~tt~ 9,~a pa~ a ..I~~i`H•, +.•!tr• Y, ti y. ' region al 'hous~iholda7:.YV ~~i ndlY iAi f•9..a r J i:.y a.' r1_ eY.uc nd stak~holde ante al w a$ O t~ 6t pln early;g pr, '~A. t.. .f~~,,y.;~ were conducted:" usin quest i ons'imila=r y T g 4to "those cl xin,heui~.$y,~tlanzviduals,y' ~Ieaaers• oo: ou a gY .f s ~y ~ ancl'organizanon=4. ~ k + 4 Y. ,r a.•t 4•~~,.• , rr: • -T..: :r-'• ti+. y` Z~. { 4w~'ryvS~+n r LYll119•May t....•:: a , . ;and' June two' aclditiOn Is~ 1. 0 ut; o ~p~(~rtun~t aps are sc ed led bji P r Pd' y+ J . _.J .l ~k al4.1,• xe`Ra r ut ~"t5rE T Four public`:.Wo$ksho s wit$'uei fiboirh® -and c" una r• ou s and2the.:~' ter'-rti'{?x~~n• -..i~'i~''i~ - >?tf'=s •ar..:- <s•~ Y. general-public-are;scheduledcfo -nud,.Tune;,<an input•from.:eve lanaan commission and group, cif. elected off cials in the:region willbe obtamecl through ~~s presentations such as this.. one: { r ` ~ * ' a i , The purpose ®f this'and utherinpvt ®ppartunutles is to;.findsout zwhat^ people,, value in terms of they egion's fiihir'e' ;whiclirof'tliese yaluesFare;n ost unportant; zr and to begin. to `generateidea oi,the: clncteris~cs..to_ :be ;considered ''n: ~.Y _r t ,a+•: L a•y r { tJ3JS7:lL ~"~'3i t.<: developing alternative+scenarios: . '?.]'•'i->.ti7C,. lc r A , -^a •.i •:.r: `<<~T ~,t4 1LJJ~ - i7 > h z.. y} 4 - . ~ •s t 1, ~r,;~ U9 -tSy 1f- y~ r 3 n.:•~..3''n. " . - .~•_~o al.'. . s.t•.n. Vii. ' Again; the information that>?well lie presehted and<'discussed todaxwas'. re aiecl ` b Metro -and Poll "Ws-'tlie''discussion~;format-. a <=b ' by J sedat`S.O:small';v~oF~cshops''at;tliep~~_..F,: Xn r s' Metro Growth Conference-,April 21'0ur'commiinity s vaews.;ma~rrdiffer.we:r should identify these=differencesif anandconve themtolVSetZO`as art-of ~ = Y the process. ` - ,>Ry'gyi"_;' '1d~7~s~I~'212w e+`~r.~, 'S, i.iN:•..: • .,r:!.. REGION 2040•. q. 1'R ~tJ,+!'tk't!yt;~~ w'r''~}•'OS{-~ ',¢c~ z':'S~; ,.r.;,;,;,. • • -'k ?;.,'i,•~.. n;Y_:: ~;•;,r .~;t: n}}~~:'f...t'SY~`i~•.>>0;. r~.:~.gyY;~.lr`1~~'7.1• p.fi: tF: Local Government Kit (.t s _ ~ <1•.'e•:, ill i ik• S Full Session:~andOlits. • , 3` r r L. 4. 1. f,t R. Yv n. ~d+ rt- ~:i • G R> a .i v• •r REGIONAL GRO, • S:';;'!4.4,5:. ` • • r ' ,.C•T~,`~ f'. Z'lmCiIiQS aboaat.~a S• er' form: ®f wt~.'.7~fie•ffiap,and >";x"} tf~K?~!: .hw .6 m- Al' i[d p~licies'should *n* P ffiYn~d'~flng ~groW ~h: _ ;to(: ^i."-" ; r y.. ~-w3~F~ acco ~!~.'+~'',.°,rj~ .i: .7:d :(r~... C~t'tl'!•••'•.''~.W~~ S~ab~i~'f .1.,':..'~•,`T~: '~-"S r. :i. ••s; ^~.;;yR'r~JSi::~7t5i'•^T;c:'~r~~'^;°,+'~j•y •'-~..r:,". #1 In, the' central city #2 r k x'4.4 t'c.,r~ kzlr~~a: c?t -i ~r j .T ti ! ra 7fii cafes or activity centers outside the central city ; . ~A i R , y „ , ' qq4 zS ~•1`r+ai"3dfY ,r.rQs4 }•$q'XS•1.'~T; l'1~"~g ' #3.. -•3`,„ / Ya VCili areasiLL YIYLi Wlt dVn.7LLLW Oj`. In- Sllb level went pjnside: ttie cuirent UGB : n• growth outside•+he~LTC,$ C _4, ; r S C"e n high-densf comd : ors radiatin famahe.central. g. cityorfaro~iiid:;= . ;`suburban cities or activity centers Y T~}~ ✓ Y~2'+` rf .l f~ f„r ~ r_ ~ •''C r, f r1 d r t a a C L:r Jk 4, In new r towns or neotraditional neighborhoods inside the ' _ UGB .fk , g satelhte~cihP.s outside tll~' Ul/~W wr 3` ? C 1 f iat Tr*; r5y t r~ s~~1 {S {n l i' Q{{Q[ 7*• p' - _ rti r is Y aF gun..; t...-!,. ang urbanfox*' z t ' at is a ~t s fr0ffi. thOSe listed bb. e ` - T`} ° - 4ti~ r r3 YT'~5r•Y r k - ~ ` i 5zK Themes about : ; ' i.°~ .i ; xxrud +f~.T ~i' n ,T tFs? ,?d th' e'Pioses of.plann`ua-~ba¢i fornn.i The map and pohciesshould,# .'emphasize the-importance of the fouowingfunctions :.(b . _ ue not to-:fl he:exclusi®n:=gf..others)=- #9. Mobilityby automobile s • _ u a J ,e #10 Mobility by non auto m6des'-1-11- ~'-Environmental spa ` quality ~open ce natural r.•sodrop protection #12. Economic development r~'Y #13. Affordable housin g. - #14 Balancing jobs and housing r 12 -MOM i C_. Glossary - continued T1I1'.ME.S - . Themes about -the location 'or form of- growth.;:, Emphasize- accommodating growth::, : ' #1. In the central city. Emphasize accommodating expected population growth within Portland, the central city of the region. ...Even under this theme; however, it is likely that "a majority of the expected population growth' will locate inside the central_,city:- For example, Portland' s.] Livable :City Project establishes a target of capturing 20% of the region's projected. growth, an increase from today's 3 . #Z. In cities or activity centers"outside the central city. ...This, theme emphasizes expanding large suburban. citties.like, Gresham or. Beaverton,new. hubs at `s smaller cities, or -existing activity .centers, .like. Clackamas*.Town Center and < Washington Square.: • Portland's growth ;would be. closer to. the:,Current regional . projection of 3 % of total growth. _ #3. ; In suburban areas at current densities of development.,.,. years.:: most population and employment growth in the region.has occurred_ou ( central city: Most of that population growth has been accommodated by housing construction iri':unWUt areas:;:;Single-familydevelppmeait has.occurred at an average of about S,dwelling units/>net. acre (ab6uf;3.5:d:u./gross.acre).: - -family development'has:occurred.at an:average•of::over;;16 d:u./net acre; Multi though in Multnomah County-.the average- is. over. 28 du:/na (about, l7. • T d.u./ga).=-Over half 'of all building permits issuedbetween.1985 and 1989: were for multiple-family units. #4. Inside the current UGB (no growth outside the UGB):Increase densities throughout the region -as;necessary.to ensure,that, the; expected -population growth is accommodated withou expanding the current UGB: This theme is the only theme which assumes no • movement of the. current,UGB...Other seems suggest maintaining the:UGB (for example.theme.numbers 1, :5;.6, 10), but it could be expanded. Other. themes suggest expanding the.UGB. (for example theme numbers 3, 7, 9). #5. In high-density corridors radiating from the central city, or around suburbans cities or activity centers. Corridors are those areas within one- . fourth to one mite on either side of major transportation facilities. Consideration of which existing or new corridors should be.stressed and whether to favor growth throughout the corridor or growth at the connections between the corridors should be made. C 11-3 / • ° , :z . . Glossary (continued)"".'*,,. #11: Environmental quality; open, space, and natural`resource.protection. iLocate; `'land uses and population m a way that allows the, best possibilities for :'j paeseiving environmental quality. However;. this. theme'should: still be Beveloped to 'accommodate all the growth.. A key consideration is show much environmental protection the region can - have without unacceptable losses of . other components of quality of life,-like the employment choices and -wages brought by economic development... #12: Econornic development.. Locate land uses and population in away that allows the best possibilities for economic growth. Identification of, existing' employment centers and the critical transportation links, that serve. them is critical.. #13.' Affordable housing.'. Land uses and population are located in a-way that allows 'the.best possibiliti es for, developing affordable housing.-.- aConsiderations,.::: . may include whether housing affordability adequately covers: the range of 'housing issues that public policy should address; the factors. that ~contdbute. to housing affordability,. and the urban form most compatible with, development . , densities, types, and designs offering the greatest 'range of housing opportunities for citizens of all income groups. _ LM #14: ` Balance of jobs and housing. tLocate.land uses and populataon_in a.way.that allows the best possibilities for people. to live near.:where,, thi y_= cork. ; Emphasize`locatin Jobs and housin with differea~t levels of.affordabih as g. g=- ty close together as possible to reduce commuting trips. and distance :,One >consequence of 'this theme is the reliance on more local transportation modes. H- 5 - -s r I "now rl+3 To Tigard City Council; As residents of the Tigard community we would like you to consider the initial plan that was promised to us by Dr. Graham, in a previous city park's meeting in 1987/88. The asphalt pathway was to connect Eden Court with lot #811-97 and exit to the West culdesac on Pathfinder Way. The considered proposal for the greenway path from Eden Court to 107th Court will manifest the following problems: A. Safety 1. No direct visual view from any.homes 2. Steep incline with open access to swift running water. 3. Waterway dangerously accessible to small children. 4. No view of any.block home. B. Security ; 1. Allows for easier and quicker exit for unwanted vagrancy, burglars and juveniles. 2. No direct visual view from any home. C. Environment 1. Loss of wildlife ducks (wood ducks, birds, le. kingfishers, beaver, raccoons, and squirrels) 2. Loss of natural vegetation. 3. Increase litter. D. Cost 1. More expensive additional paving 2. Long term maintenance. l 3. Retaining walls for home owners, due to erosion. In closing we feel the city should utilize the existing sidewalks and safe street as part of the greenway system, allowing for maximum lase of minimal funds appointed for park and recreation. i i We Thank you for your consideration, i sum I S mum Kamm IfibyAl NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ommm _ w /0 8Sa .sue a. ~ 1-10 0 qv jvj h eV- W~ 6z~1 -0329 /65 85-__SW 4 oq-65~(-/ I;< Ii NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER s' t` o 4A ~..-hrd_a r ld l~_ r 7Z- i G 311, a , ~ 1735 S ~ •~~`a~l~eti ~ Zit" 573 - Z2 Azu/ Q TTzY - (A) 4)IK .x I . I 1 lig W--. k- - wn I 116 fto7ma, , X x C PROCLAMATION e NATIONAL POLICE WEEK i WHEREAS, crime and Its effect upon the lives and property of the citizens of Tigard and surrounding communities is of utmost concern, and continued efforts of our Police Department to curb this problem are greatly t appreciated; and WHEREAS, the problems of crime touch and effect all segments of our ' society, and can undermine and erode the moral and economic strengths of our communities and their cltlzens If unabated; and WHEREAS, each year, approximately one in four children under the age of Y; fifteen receives an injury serious enough to require medical attention; and WHEREAS, the members of the Tigard Police Department strive to provide and maintain a safe environment for the citizens of Tigard; and WHEREAS, the members of the Police Department and the dedicated services performed by them are certainly appreciated and worthy of special recognition; - NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor I of the City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby declare i May 11 through May 15 - as NATIONAL POLICE WEEK and urge all Tigard citizens to observe those special days in honor of the professional and dedicated members of our Police Department. Dated this day of 1992. : IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have herou t my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed X s(C ter't XV Gerald R. Edwards-, Mayor ' City of Tigard t o Attest: ~~.tf~~'•2~e L.U~2~p ' City Recorder t i x X. Q I PROCLAMATION ' 1 To designate the week of May 10-16, 1992 ° as "Emergency Medical Services Week" I WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams devote their lives to saving the lives of others; ..i WHEREAS, emdrgency medical services teams consist of emergency physicians, nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, educators and administrators; WHEREAS, the people of Tigard benefit dally from the knowledge and skill of these trained individuals; WHEREAS, the professional organizations of providers of emergency medical services promote research to Improve and adapt their skills as new methods of emergency treatment are developed; WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams encourage national standardization of training and testing of emergency medical personnel and reciprocal recognition of training and credentials by the States; WHEREAS, the designation of Emergency Medical Services Week will serve to j educate the people of Tigard about Injury prevention and what to do when confronted with a medical emergency, and i WHEREAS, It Is appropriate to recognize the value and accomplishments of emergency medical services teams by designating Emergency Medical Services Week. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1, Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor of ttie City of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim the week of May 10-16, 1992 as Emergency Medical Serviceq Week" and encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ° i ceremonies, and activities. Dated this day of , 1992. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto s y hand and caused the Seal of i t` the City of Tigard to be affixed. i I • Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor City of Tigard la4 Atte ' J I I Recorder b j !C I I I , 1 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4-2 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator / DATE: April 6, 1992 i SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, May - July 192 Official Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. May 192 4 Mon Budget Committee Meeting 11 Mon Budget Committee Meeting 12 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) 19 Tue Council Meeting Cancelled 21 Thur Council Goal Setting - Tigard Shilo Inn (8 am - 5 pm) 25 Mon Memorial Day Holiday - City Offices Closed 26 Tue Board and Committee Interviews (5:30) Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) June 192 9 Tue Council Meeting council study session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) 16 Tue Council Study Meeting (6:30) 23 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) July f92 3 Fri 4th of July Holiday falls on Saturday; City Hall Offices closed July 3 14 Tue Council Meeting Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) 21 Tue Council Study Meeting 28 Tue Board and Committee Interviews (5:30) Council Study Session (6:30) Council Business Meeting (7:30) h:\login\cathy\cccal COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4,3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: April 29, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorization or PREVIOUS ACTION: acquisition of Right of Way for tXelA 14 109th Avenue E tension PREPARED BY: Gar Alfson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY: i 4 ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL J Acquisition of Right of Way for the 109th Avenue Extension project. z STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the attached resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY Right of Way is needed in order to construct the 109th Avenue extension from Naeve Street to 99W at Royalty Parkway. A project meeting was held April C~- 22nd and the proposed alignment presented without opposition. Affected property owners and neighboring residents were notified of the meeting. The ! selected alignment is shown on the attached drawing. The alignment was designed based on minor collector standards with the intentions to keep the roadway as far away from the Fountains as possible, provide access to adjacent properties and to leave parcels large enough to develop in the future. The Council has previously authorized funding for this project and has approved contracts for design. The attached resolution authorizes staff to proceed with negotiations to purchase right of way for the project. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing acquisition of Right of Way. 2. Withhold authorization. 5 y FISCAL NOTES The costs for the acquisition of Right of Way are funded by Traffic Impact Fees. C ga/ss-109th.row Jam.. s LA (COO H 1) t1 11011 ZO WVW ats~"~t( ~.oscv's 3 ~yyl3 1 `r,,,...r•` a N ~ 3SE S4sj'jJGI M 3sr H1) a a 3 j , 1 009380 ~ d y 460 6 gad to-ofl ! ~s %r N ~X3 1911V S N 3 w30 o_ sins SCE - " tl 'bs !5E'LE1 r - - / / L i .DP'DSE z v J / ~ / ~ .40.45.Bt ~ J I 1/ siua 59'D ~ .i) •bs '659P2 ' l / 9 ~ .6rPtz s a rte.-~'~ t / A fz. I J 1 t .11 •bs '191 D9 ~ sans it s7»n ►Z'D .11 •bs 'SZODS 'N 'bs '9016 6 S i 1-4 I r ~ ! ID'D I' 'Ds 1511 ~ d1Z11 w+ 1710 ,6bt5•D9 / s7no iE't i t nn ~o I / sin N bs 019 1 I p _ _ f- --11 B?7f1 sano lSD f t f ~y ,g~ ,11 •ps `I6iZ 1 ;f i COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM L11 _ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 ATE SUBMITTED: May 1. 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appropriate REVIOUS ACTION: Grant Awards for Park Im roveme PREPARED BY: Wayne Lowr DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0' REQUESTED BY: ISSUE BEFORE, HE COUNCIL Shall the City Council budgetarily prov de for several grants awarded to the City of Tigard for park improvements associated with Park Levy projects? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the budget be amended to allow for awarded grants as set forth in the attached resolution. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City has been awarded the following grants to fund certain park improvements associated with Park Levy projects. Englewood Handicap Access CDBG $10,284 Cook Park Handicap Access CDBG 12,500 Cook Park Waterfront Marine Board 12,133 Cook Park Waterfront ODOT 812 Cook Park Waterfront Fish & Wildlife 27,754. 3 The Cook Park Waterfront projects have already been completed in conjunction with Park Levy projects at Cook Park and the grant funds have already been received. Some matching funds were required and were funded from existing Park Project appropriations. Local budget law allows for the appropriations of grant funds by Council resolution. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES Approve resolution. Do nothing. FISCAL NOTES Approval will bring the City into compliance with local budget law and will increase appropriations in the Park Levy CIP fund by $67,473. i` F i r- COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY (Local Contract Review Board) AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: April 22, 1992 Y ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorization to PREVIOUS ACTION: i advertise for bids for the Main Street , Drainage Capital Improvement Pro`ect PREPARED BY: Greg Berry DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: j ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Shall the LCRB authorize advertisement for bids for the Main Street Drainage 3 Capital Improvement Project? - - - STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Engineer to advertise for bids for the Main Street Drainage Capital Improvement Project. INFORMATION SUMMARY In accordance with the City's purchasing rules, authorization is requested to advertise for construction bids for the Main Street Drainage Capital Improvement Project. C-- This project will resolve the problems of water ponding in the intersection of Main and Commercial Streets during periods of heavy rainfall. The project involves construction of a new storm drainage connection along Commercial Street, between Main Street and the new storm drain line constructed under the railroad last year near Pacific Highway. The project is designed to later be extended to serve other portions of Main Street. After construction bids are received, LCRB review will again be required prior to awarding a contract for the project. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES FISCAL NOTES This project was previously budgeted as a capital improvement project in a previous fiscal year and carried over into this year°s budget. main-s.1 ; i i f COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4,5 b• ( CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY (Local Contract Review Board) AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: April 29, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Bid Award PREVIOUS ACTION: Pavement Major Maintenance Pro ra Overlay Program PREPARED BY: Gar Alf son DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY; ISSUE B FORE THE COUNCIL Award the contract for construction of the Pavement Major Maintenance Program, Overlay Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Administrator to sign a contract with Morse Brothers Inc. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Pavement Major Maintenance Program, Overlay Program involves applying an asphaltic concrete overlay over the existing pavement on three streets, 72nd Avenue from Bonita to Fir Loop, Katherine Street from 121st to Mary S. Woodward School and Durham Road east of Boones Ferry Road. These streets are exhibiting signs of distress and should be overlayed to increase the structural capacity. Seven bids were received from r contractors to perform the construction. The bid results are as follows: 1Morse Brothers, Sherwood $135,475.00 Lakeside Industries, Portland $135,625.00 K F Jacobsen, Inc., Portland $143,050.00 Parker Northwest Paving, Oregon City $146,875.00 Baker Rock Resources, Beaverton $149,585.00 Eagle-Elsner, Tigard $149,758.00 Oregon Asphalt Paving $153,025.00 The engineer's estimate was $165,000. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. 2. Reject all bids. FISCAL NOTES The project is funded by the 3.991-92 Tigard Capital Improvement Projects Budget. ga\ss-olayl.ga COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM L1, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY (Local Contract Review Board) AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: April 23, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Sattler Street PREVIOUS ACTION: Reconstruction Bid Award PREPARED BY: Gary Alfson DEPT HEAD OKj&ZE CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Award the contract for construction of the Sattler Street Reconstruction project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Administrator to sign a contract with Eagle/Elsner, Inc. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Sattler Street Reconstruction project involves the reconstruction of the existing deteriorated pavement from approximately 96th Avenue to 91st Avenue and the widening of a short section west of 96th Avenue. Seven bids were received from contractors to perform the construction. The bid results are as follows: Eagle-Elsner Tigard $44,338.91 Porter W. Yett Co. Portland $50,280.00 C Kerr Contractors Tualatin $51,492.00 Parker Northwest Paving, Oregon City $54,000.00 Northwest Earthmovers, Inc. Tualatin $57,057.00 Morse Brothers, Sherwood $60,185.00 Lakeside Industries, Portland $68,092.00 The Engineer's estimate was $45,000. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. z 2. Reject all bids. FISCAL NOTES The project is funded by the Tigard Capitol Improvement Projects Budget. ga\ss-satlr.ga \ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: February 14, 1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Comp. Plan Ame EVIOUS ACTION: Planning Comm. Hearing Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 401 Zone Change ZON 92-0001 REPARED BY: Ron Pomeroy DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK QUESTED BY: Ed Murphy ISSUE BEFO THE COUNCIL Should the City amend the Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning designations to redesignate a 2.55 acre parcel located at 10330 SW Scholls Ferry Road (WCTM 1S1 34AB, Tax Lot 3300) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change request be denied. INFORMATION SUMMARY 'he proposal seeks to redesignate an approximately 2.55 acre site from a Plan '--Designation of Medium Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and change the zoning designation from R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre). This proposal satisfies or supports most City and State land use policies. However, the approval of a quasi-judicial amendment to the plan map requires that the City find that there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community which affects the parcel or that there has been a mistake in the original designation of the parcel. The Planning Commission could not make findings supporting either case and recommended denial by a 4 to 1 margin. Opposition was expressed by residents of the surrounding area through the submittal of a neighborhood petition and by NPO 7. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zone Change and direct staff to prepare a resolution adopting the staff findings. 2. Approve the requested Comprehensive Plan Map and `Lone designation and direct staff to prepare an ordinance reflecting the Council's findings. FISCAL IMPACTS to direct impacts. l f The City o f ~ T I G A R D CPA 92 0001 1 ce cs~ %oe $a% y Site Area 63 S1 B-03300 SC~4~LS c~ w fo q FIKON C N 0101141 Ills k map rlprr1/1- 111114 Ianpll N 17 UI C117 II IIIIfI YIII II III C11111' DCD DR ca pC 15(1441 laara'a Mara, 0 motl/a par lr4711 Ilra n/7 111/4111 le 11 and Yi1M alliliaaal C N o R r a 14,4,1411 411,4( Ial111(IIIl1.1 1011 41 /lllral all 13 111 CI17 of Ill/ri. pA131~ (WPC ® ~ 0 100 (03/11117 aii AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: April 20, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. HEARING LOCATION: Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ` A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 92-0001 Zone Change ZON 92-0001 REQUEST: Plan Map Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential, and Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units per acre). APPLICANT/OWNER: Chester Robinson 10330 SW Scholls Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97223 AGENT: Planning Resources, Inc. (Rick Givens). 6564 Lake Road Milwaukie, OR 97222 LOCATION: 10330 SW Scholls, Ferry Road (WCTM 1S1 34AB, Tax Lot 3300) 2. Background Information The applicant's home, a single-family detached residence, is located on the property. :There have been no land use applications approved by the City for this site. 3. Proposal Description The application requests a Plan Map Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential for the 2.55 acre site. Additionally, the applicant proposes to change the zone from the existing R-12 designation to R-25. The application package includes an applicant's statement prepared by Planning Resources, Inc. in support of the application. CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 1 i 4. Vicinity Information Pages two and three of the applicant's statement include details on existing development both on the subject property and in the surrounding area. Additionally, this description provides information' on public facilities which are available to serve future redevelopment of this site. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The State of Oregon Highway Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The jurisdiction over this section of Scholls Ferry Road has-been transferred from ODOT to'Washington County, therefore ODOT will defer to the County's comments with regard to this section of. roadway. Upon completion of the Scholls Highway widening project, the road will consist of four 12-foot travel lanes, a continuous 14-foot left turn median } lane, additional right-turn lanes at most signalized intersections, 6-foot bicycle lanes, } curbs, and -6-foot sidewalks, with a signal at Conestoga Drive. The application states that Statewide. Planning Goal 12 and Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.1.1 can be met b4cause "City staff have indicated that this roadway- has adequate capacity to service the proposed land use." However, no analysis has been preformed of the capacity of the new signalized intersection of Conestoga and Scholls to handle the additional--- traffic.- The 19-87' Traffic Analysis Report performed as part, of the widening project indicates that the intersection after improvement will operate at Level of Service (LOS) "D" for the left turn movement from the north, and the through movement from the east. Adding a phase to this intersection to accommodate traffic from the site will definitely impact the LOS of this intersection, and may bring it down to an unacceptable LOS "E". The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed plan amendment and zone change can meet Statewide Planning Goal 12, City Policy 8.1.1, nor section OAR 660--12-060 of the Transportation Planning -Rule. Without additional information, it is not possible to evaluate whether the intersection has adequate capacity to handle the additional traffic that would be generated by a doubling of the density. s C~ CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 2 . I Additionally, as indicated by the Environmental Assessment for the Scholls Highway 'Widening project, noise walls will be constructed in front of the On-the-Green Condominiums, Conestoga Apartments, Westwood Green Apartments, and Springwood Village Apartments. -The developer of this property should be aware that noise should be considered in the future design of this project. The Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. SW Scholls Ferry Road is now under the jurisdiction of Washington County. 2. This request could potentially result in an increase of traffic generated from the 2.55 acre site. Washington County is concerned that adequate findings be required for the record to show that this proposed Zone Change will not impact Regional and County Level of Service goals. According to - the ITE trip generation data, this site could currently generate 192 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 19 Peak Hour Trips. The.proposed Zone Change could raise the- ADT to 400 .'and. 44 Peak Hour Trips .[A difference of 308 ADT and 25 Peak Hour Trips. The County requests that the City defer a decision on this proposal until the applicant provides additional--traffic information which shows that: The regional peak-hour level of service goal is "D with 20 minutes of E". At this level there i s moderate" traffic congestion, and motorists are likely to stop for one signal cycle at each signalized intersection. Evidence must be submitted that the above Level of Service requirement can, or will, be met prior to approval of the Zone Change. 3. Scholls Ferry Road is a County Major Arterial with a minimum access spacing standard of 1,000 feet. Since the proposed access opposite Conestoga is less that 1,000 feet from SW Springwood, a variance to the Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards will be necessary to allow access to SW Scholls Ferry Road. An alternative to this could be obtained upon the acquisition of a shared access to SW Springwood to the south and east of the site. C ' CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 3 i I r 4. Adequate right-of-way exists along the site's frontage.of SW Scholls Ferry Road. Therefore, County staff recommends that the proposed Zone Change be DEFERRED until adequate findings are in the record which assure one of the following: 1) Adequate Levels of Service can be maintained for Scholls Ferry Road along the site's frontage. If such findings are in the record showing that Level of Service Goals can be met at the Conestoga/Scholls intersection, the applicant shall request and receive approval for a Modification to the Washington County Uniform Road improvement Design Standards to allow new access within 1,000 feet of SW Springwood; or a 2) Obtain access to the south and/or east of the site to SW Springwood Drive. If such access is possible and proposed, the applicant shall be required to demonstrate that the Springwood/Scholls intersection shall continue to operate at levels of service acceptable to the County. Such access may require the signalization of the Springwood/Scholls intersection. The City of Tigard Engineering Department has reviewed this application and has determined that adequate public services are available to serve this site. The R-25 zoning designation could generate twice as much traffic from this site as is possible with the current R-12 .zoning designation.. The applicant states that if a multi-family development were to be constructed on this site (R-12 or R-25*), the access point for the development would line up with the existing roadway (SW Conestoga Drive). The City will have the opportunity to further review future potential impacts under the Site Development Review application process. Tigard Water District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Although we have no objections to the proposed zoning change, we would like to inform the developer that an eight inch (minimum) water main would need to be extended from SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW Springivzood Drive to the proposed development site. As with all developments, water main size and location, including water meters, will be reviewed and approved through the Water District. Q CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 4 School District number 48 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: This proposal for a Plan Amendment and Zone Change will not impact enrollment at Beaverton School District. Please submit when the property will be developed. Neighborhood Planning Organization #7 has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: NPO #7 would like to table this application until the next meeting to allow: 1) the surrounding residents to be notified by the City; 2) a comment period to be provided; and 3) item F of the application elements to be satisfied. In response to the comments from NPO #7, notice of this Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within 250 feet of the subject site on March 31, 1992. Therefore, the comment period which is required by the State of Oregon (20 days) has been met. Additionally, item F on the CPA/ZON application form requests a list of property owners and addresses within 250 feet of the subject site. This list is in the applicant's file and was generated prior to the mailing of the notice. It was this list which was used by-the City to mail the public hearing notice to all property owners within 250 feet of the subject site. There-was no comment from the NPO regarding-! -the specific. application request. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District #1, and The City of Beaverton have reviewed the proposal and have offered no objections-`to-t-ie proposed redesignation. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, and 13; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.6.1,- 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.2, and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria, and the change or mistake quasi-judicial map amendment criteria of both the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code. The Planning Division concludes that the proposal is consistent with - the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: 1. Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement) and Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1 are satisfied because the City has CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 5 ~IJR 1 y adopted a citizen involvement program including review of all land use and development applications by City established Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPOs). NPO #7 has been provided with an opportunity to review this proposal. These comments have been included in this staff report. In addition, all public notice requirements related to this application have been satisfied. 2. Goal #2 (Land Use Planning), Plan Policy 1.1.1, and the quasi-judicial plan and zone change approval standards of Code Section 18.22.040 are satisfied because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies, and Community Development Code requirements to the review of this proposal, as described in this report. The City of Tigard has notified other affected units of government including Washington County, the Oregon Department of Dam Transportation Highway Division, and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development of the proposal. Service and utility providing agencies have also been notified of the proposal. 3. Goal #10 (Housing) is satisfied because the proposal would provide for additional housing opportunities as promoted by. the City's .Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660, Division 7). The Metropolitan Housing Rule requires that the City maintain a minimum housing opportunity.- rate_for developable land of 10 units per acre and a minimum housing opportunity mix of 50/50 for single family and multi-family housing. Approval of the proposal would provide increased housing opportunities on the City's developable residential lands by 33 dwelling units. 4. The proposal is consistent with the public facility objectives of Goal #11 (Public Facilities and Services) because adequate public facilities presently exist at or near the site to serve development at the residential densities proposed by the requested Plan Amendment.- As pointed out in the applicant's narrative, sanitary sewer is available to service the site from a 15 inch trunk line which follows the south and west boundary lines of this property. Water service is available from the 12 inch water main in SW Springwood Drive. All utilities will be provided concurrently with the further development of this site, and will be designed to City standards, and will be placed underground. 5. Goal #12 (Transportation) and Goal #13 (Energy Conservation) would be satisfied through providing an r CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 6 E i i i opportunity for an intensive land use to be adjacent•to a major transportation corridor=(Scholls Ferry Road) that presently is served by Tri-Met buses. In addition,-the proposed redesignation would provide increased housing opportunities near a substantial amount of existing retail and service opportunities. The convenience of nearby transit service and commercial opportunities to a higher density residential development can result in a lesser need for individual vehicle trips on nearby roads, and a companion benefit of lessened energy resource consumption. Therefore, this proposal would be supportive of these Statewide Goals. The subject site is located along an arterial, SW Scholls Ferry Road. Specific design concerns related to access to this road will need to be considered in the development review process-for future development of the site. However, the applicant does state that the future access point to this property upon further development would an ingress and egress point lined up with the intersection of Conestoga Drive and Scholls Ferry Road. The Planning Division staff has determined that the proposal is largely consistent with applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: " 6. Plan Policy 2.1.1 (Citizen Involvement) is satisfied- because Neighborhood Planning Organization 7 and surrounding property owners were given notice of the public hearing related to this request as well as their opportunity to comment on the proposal. eeds) is"satisfled because 7. Plan Policy -61y(Housing Needs).-1s'" the proposal would provide the opportunity for additional medium-high density multi-family development which would increase the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. This is detailed in the above discussion regarding Statewide Planning Goal 10. 8. Plan Policy 6.6.1 (Buffering and Screening) will be satisfied through the application of the buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code to any future development proposal for this property. 9. Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 (Public Facilities and Services) are satisfied because adequate public water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, fire and rescue, and police service capacities are available to serve potential development on the subject property. Specific concerns related to extension of utility services to the site or analysis of storm drainage CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 7 7 I r" C provisions will need to be considered in the development review processes upon future development of the site. 10. Plan Policy 8.1.1 (Transportation) requires the City to plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system. that meets current needs and anticipated future development. The subject property fronts SW Scholls Ferry Road. This street is an arterial and is currently being improved to four traffic lanes and a center left turn lane along the frontage of this site. As stated above the Agency Comments section, a traffic analysis would provide verification as to whether the potential increase of density on this site would produce negative traffic impacts on SW Scholls Ferry Road. 11. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a condition of approval of any future development of the property. Street improvements are currently being installed by the State of Oregon Highway Division as specified above under Plan Policy. 8.1.1. Street right-of-way has already been dedicated along the property frontage to allow for the widening of Scholls Ferry Road. The City°s Engineering Division will review any future development proposals for this property to ensure that all necessary on-site streets, curbs and sidewalks will be constructed at the time of development. 12. Plan Policies 8.2.2 and 9.1.1 are satisfied because Tri- Met offers bus service on SW Scholls Ferry Road in close proximity. to._this site. In addition, a variety of commercial and service opportunities exist along SW Scholls Ferry Road relatively close to the site. Therefore, the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive.type--of.:development within close proximity to an existing public transit route and needed retail services supportive or residents, needs, thereby encouraging a reduction in energy consumption as compared to typical suburban development patterns. 13. Plan Policy 9.1.2 is satisfied because the proposed redesignation would provide the opportunity for medium- high density residential development in proximity to transit routes, major highways, and existing commercial services thereby promoting efficient use of the transportation system and possible reduced energy consumption. 14. The locational criteria specified in Plan Policy 12.1.1 for Medium-High Density Residential use are satisfied for the following reasons: CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 8 NOW a. The land use pattern surrounding the subject property is predominantly multifamily residential. As the applicant's statement points out, the surrounding area specifies a Medium Density Comprehensive Plan designation to the immediate south, west and east of the site. General Commercial is located further to the west, with Industrial Park further to the east. Condominiums and apartments are located directly north of the site, within the jurisdiction of City of Beaverton, whereas the area south of the site and across Englewood Park is designated Low Density Residential. b. Density transition, buffering, and screening requirements of the Community Development Code may be used to help make any future development on the subject property more compatible with the low density single family residences located to the south,. across Englewood Park. This on-site perimeter landscaping shall be addressed during any future site development review. C. The site has direct access from Scholls Ferry Road which is functionally classified as an arterial street. d. Serious development limitations affecting the properties, such as flood plains, excessively steep slopes-or poor drainage, are not evident. e. Essential public facilities are present in to serve future development on this site. It appears that these _--facilities and services--Have - sufficient capacity to serve any increase in demand caused by development of the site. f. Public transit is available on SW Scholls Ferry Road directly at the site. Transit service is provided by Tri-Met route 45. g. A small commercial center (Parkside Shops and Offices) is located immediately to the northeast of this site across Scholls Ferry Road. A larger shopping center, the Greenway Town Center development, is located approximately 1,200 feet to the west of the subject property. h. The subject property is contiguous to Englewood Park along its south and west boundaries. Englewood Park has been dedicated as permanent open 4 space. { CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 9 C 15. In order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps, the City must also find that there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community which affects the subject parcel. Alternatively, the City must find that there has been a mistake or inconsistency made in the original designation of the parcel (Comprehensive Plan, Volume 2, Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Development Code Section 18.22.040(A)). The applicant's statement concedes that no mistake was made in the original designation of the site with the Medium Density Residential designation. The applicant contends, however, that the development of the apartments across the street in the City of Beaverton and the development of commercial uses immediately to the northeast have dramatically changed the character of this area. The major upgrading of Scholls Ferry Road which is under construction at this time is also a major change in the character of the neighborhood. Thus the applicant feels that a reconsideration of the land'use designation of the subject property is appropriate. This application proposes to provide the opportunity to r utilize the road improvements along SW Scholls Ferry Roads for benefit of future Medium-High Density Residential development at this site. One of the issues raised by Washington County Department of Land Use & Transportation states that these road improvements were designed. to. accommodate future traffic volumes under the current land use zoning designations along Scholls Ferry Road. In other words, these road improvements were designed to accommodate traffic impacts due to build-out of current-zonricJ~ not necessarily to accommodate the impact of the doubling of zoning densities on abutting land. While changes have occurred near the subject site, staff contends that these changes have simply been the result of expected development, given the existing zoning. Therefore, these "changes" are not of substantial merit so as to necessitate the approval of the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. The argument and findings made by the applicant in favor of Medium-High Density could also be applied to Medium Density. This implies that the original land use designation is certainly adequate to allow reasonable development of this site. Staff does not agree that the character of the area has changed on the south side of Scholls Ferry Road as this area has been developing as planned. CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 10 'e ♦ j ~f Cn C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings and conclusions listed above, the Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation for denial of the request to redesignate the subject property with the Medium-High Density { Residential Comprehensive Plan Map designation and R-25 Zoning designation. PREPARED BY: Ron Pomer APPROVED YBe dorff i f CPA 92-0001 / ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON Page 11 o Commissioner C( ile talked about the many hour f time spent by the Commission studying the various issues and options. He reminded the attendees that the meetings have been open to the public and there was no hidden agenda. He advised they were seeking what will benefit Tigard and the Triangle property owners. o President Fyre summarized what had been discussed and thanked the participants for their comments, encouraging NPO to provide input during the upcoming process. 7:25 PM WORKSHOP ADJOURNED President Fyre called the regular meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was held at Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon.. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Fyre, Barber, and Commissioners Boone, Hawley, and Moore. Absent: Commissioners Castile, Saporta, and Saxton. Staff: Associate Planner Jerry Offer, Assistant Planner Ron Pomeroy, and Planning Commission Secretary Ellen Fox. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Boone moved and Commissioner Hawley seconded to approve the minutes of the April 6th meeting as corrected. Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present, with Commissioner Barber abstaining. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS Liz Newton advised that the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee was recommending that Jo Sorell be appointed to NPO 1/2. * Commissioner Barber moved and Commissioner Boone seconded to recommend to City Council appointment of Jo A. Sorell. Motion passed by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE,, PLAN, AMENDMENT.: CPA. 924001 ''-ZONE CHANGE; .-ZON 92-0001 ROBINSON ".(NPO #7) A request for Comprehensive Plan`and Zone Change approval to allow redesignation of a 2.55 acre site from Medium Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and a zone change from R-12 (residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals: 1,2,10,11,12, and 13; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.1, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.2, and 12.1.1; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 & 12.32. LOCATION: 10330 SW Scholls Ferry Road (WCTM 1S1 34AB, tax lot 3300) PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 3 Assistant Plan(- Ron Pomeroy described the loc( on and revie.:ed the details of the request. He explained staff's interpretation of the applicable criteria. He said staff has not found there was a mistake in the original designation, nor was there a change in the character of the area. Due to concerns by Washington County and the State Highway Division, he recommended that the applicant have a traffic study done. He advised that staff recommended denial. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Richard Given, Planning Resources, Inc., said he represented Chester Robinson. He talked about the significant changes in the area, including development across Scholls Ferry Road and an increase in high density residential area. He cited examples of extensive commercial development in the area. He pointed out the need for affordable multi-family housing in the city. He noted that the site is well suited for 18/acre development, and there are good utilities and traffic improvements. He said he would be willing to put together a traffic study if necessary. PUBLIC TESTIMONY 1 o Cal Woolery, Chairman NPO 7, advised the NPO is opposed to the zone change. He spoke about some points raised in their NPO meeting, and he said they had not found there was an error in the original zoning. o Greg Hahn, 11475 SW Hazelwood Loop, Tigard, said he is a property owner in the Englewood housing development. He submitted a petition with 31 signatures of residents of adjacent neighborhoods who are opposed to this zone change (Exhibit A). He advised the zone change would be out of step with the surrounding area, and the traffic impact would have an adverse effect on the community. He recommended that if the request were approved, then there should be a buffer zone as recommended by Unified Sewerage Agency to protect the wetlands area; and the next 100 feet of property adjoining Englewood should be limited to R-12 " designation to allow for natural increase in density. He expressed concern for the adverse impact on the schools and park from the increased density. o Commissioner Hawley requested clarification regarding who had signed the petition and the location of their residences. APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL { o Richard Given sp,,ke again regarding the change in circumstances. He reiterated that there has been development across from the site as well as changes in services and needs for multi-family housing. o Commissioner Boone sought clarification concerning the layout of the plan and the site location. i 1 y PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 4 i I i PUBLIC HERRING CLOSc o Commissioner Boone said he was inclined to approve the request, as the location seemed appropriate. He did not believe the traffic impact would be significant. o Commissioner Moore agreed the location would be appropriate, but he was concerned about the transportation issues. He did not favor changing the zoning,.as there was not a significant change in circumstances. o Commissioner Hawley did not favor changing the zoning, since the land is developing according to the original designation. o Commissioner Barber advised that the traffic on Scholls Ferry Road was 4 unbelievably poor. She did not feel that there would be an increase of pedestrian activity to cut down on vehicle traffic. She favored denying the request since there did not appear to be a significant change in circumstances. o Commissioner Hawley noted that ODOT was working to improve the situation on Scholls Ferry Road, and if there is an increase in the density, it may undermine the improvements being made. o President Fyre said that although the location appears to be ideal for high density, there has not been a significant change in circumstances. He favored denial of the request. Commissioner Moore moved and Commissioner Hawley seconded to forward a recommendation to City Council to deny CPA 92-0001 and ZON 92-0001 based on the findings and conclusions of staff. Motion passed by majority vote of Commissioners present, with Commissioner Boone voting "Nay." i 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENOMM CPA 92-0002 ANDERSON (NPO #3) A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to redesignate a 7.73 acre site from Professional Commercial and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, & 13; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, 9.1.3, & 12.1.1.; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 & 18.32. LOCATION: South side of Bull Mountain Road, between 500 and 110 feet west of Pacific Highway. (WCTM 2S1 10AC, tax y lots 1300 and 1400, and 2S1 IOBD, tax lots 1600 and 2100) Commissioner Hawley reported that she is acquainted with the author of a letter received in opposition to this application. She stated it would not affect her decision on this item. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 5 S a~ 9 pig r IRA C~. COMPREHENSIVE PLAIN MAP AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION S.W. SCROLLS FERRY ROAD Tigard, Oregon p - Prepared for: Mr. Chester Robinson Prepared by: Planning Resources, Inc. February, 1992 \ INTRODUCTION: This application seeks approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 2.55 acres of land located on Scholls Ferry Road near Springwood Drive. The subject property is described as Tax Lot 3300 of Assessor's Map 1S 1 34AB. This property is presently zoned R-12 and designated Medium Density Residential. The applicant is re- questing that the City's Medium-High Density Residential comprehensive plan designation be applied to this site and that it be zoned R-25. This report has been prepared on the behalf of Mr. Chester Robinson, the owner of the subject property. This report will demonstrate that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change are consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and the policies of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. EXISTING LAND USE: A. Site: The applicant's home, a single-family detached structure is located on the site. B. Adjacent Properties: East: The Springwood Terrace and Englewood Terrace apartment complexes are located at the intersection of Springwood Terrace and Scholls Ferry Road. North: The area to the north of Scholls Ferry Road is within tre city limits of Beaver- ton. The Conestoga Apartments (270 units) and the "On the Green" condominiums (351 units) are located immediately to the north of the subject site. A small commer- cial center, "Parkside Shops and Offices", is located across from the northeast corner of the subject property. West: Englewood Park, a small neighborhood park abuts the subject property. Further to the west, the Westwood Greens apartments are situated at the intersection of S.W. 121st Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road. South: Englewood Park also abuts the south property line of this site. Beyond this park, the property to the south is zoned R-4.5 and is developed with single-family residences. PHYSICAL FEATURES: i The subject property is fairly level, sloping gently to the south towards a small creek which flows through Englewood Park. The subject property contains a few sparse trees and some outbuildings. The balance of the property is lawn and open field. i i i z PUBLIC FACILITIES: A. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to serve this site from a fifteen inch line which runs along the south and west boundaries of this site. This sever is a major trunk line and has ample capacity to accommodate the proposed R-25 zoning. B. Water Service: Tigard `JVater District provides water service in this area. A 12 inch water main is located in Springwood Drive, approximately 250 feet from the subject property. A water line would have to be extended from this main to service the pro- posed multi-family development. An existing easement through the Springwood Terrace apartment site is available for this construction. C. Storm Sewer: Storm drainage for the future multi-family development on this site would drain to the natural drainageway in Englewood Park to the south of this site. Storm water detention can be included in the design of the on-site storm sewer system to ensure that there will be no impacts upon downstream properties associated with the development of this site. D. Streets: Scholls Ferry Road is an arterial street. It is presently being upgraded in this section with a major reconstruction. Four travel lanes and a left turn refuge lane are being provided. Access to the future multi-family development would be located to align with the existing intersection of Conestoga Drive with Scholls Ferry Road, approximately 100 feet from the west property line of the subject property. Discus- sions with City traffic staff indicate that adequate capacity is present to accommodate the proposed use. COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS: The following LCDC Statewide Planning Goals are applicable to this proposed Zone Change and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application: Goal #2: Establish a land use planning process and policy framework as the basis of all land use decisions and actions, and ensure an adequate factual data base to substanti- ate those decisions and actions. Comment: The procedures provided in the Tigard Community Development Code for review of this application for a Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change will serve to ensure that the decision of the Planning Commission and City Council are based upon established policies. The information contained in this report is intended to provide a factual base to support th,3 approval of this application. a ( C Goal #10.- Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, the region and the state. Comment: This proposal would increase the potential for providing adequate housing to meet projected needs in the City of Tigard. At the present time, the subject property is designated Medium Density Residential and zoned R-12. The proposed Medium High Density designation and R-25 zoning would provide the opportunity. to double the housing on this site, making more efficient use of existing public facilities and services. The Metropolitan Housing Rule (O.A.R. 660-07) interprets Goal 10 for the Portland Metropolitan Area. This Rule requires that the City of Tigard main- tain a vacant land inventory which averages 10 housing units per acre and maintains a 50-50 mix of single-family to multi-family development. According to staff, this requirement is currently met by the City, with a margin of about 300 units. If the City is to have flexibility to consider Plan Amendment propos- als from residential to other plan designations or from higher to lower residen- tial designations, a greater cushion is needed which will provide for continued compliance with this standard. The proposed Plan Amendment will assist the City in its continued compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Goal #11: Plan and develop a timely, orderly and eficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development. Comment: At issue under this Goal is whether the proposed multi-family residential desig- nation is consistent with the level of public facilities and services which are presently available to the site or which can be made available at the time of development. As discussed in the preceding section of this report, adequate water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and transportation facilities can be made available to service the proposed R-25 zoning for this property. Thus, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Goal 11. Goal #12. Provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Comment: The designation of this site for Medium-High Density Residential development is consistent with Goal 12. Scholls Ferry Road is a major arterial street and is, thus, suited for providing access to R-25 zoned properties. City staff have indicated that this roadway has adequate capacity to service the proposed land use. Tri-Met bus service (Route 45) is immediately available on Scholls Ferry Road at the frontage of the subject property. Goal # 13. Conserve energy. C Comment: Multi-family residential development is a very energy efficient residential land use. Because units share common walls, energy loss is greatly reduced as E compared with traditional single-family detached homes. Thus, the proposed i t 7 f Plan Amendment and Zone Change will foster a greater conservation of energy for home heating than does the existing designation. Further, the location of multi-family development in an area with quick access to public transit and close to the arterial system which accesses nearby commercial areas is condu- cive to conservation of energy for transportation requirements. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Policy 1.1.Z Page H-7 The Comprehensive Plan and each of its elements shall be opened for amendments that consid- er compliance with the plans of the Metropolitan Service District (MSD) or its successor on an annual basis, and may be so amended or revised if deemed necessary by the City Council. Annual amendment and revision for compliance with the above regional goals, objectives and plans shall be consistent with any schedule for reopening of local plans approved by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). This provision is not to be construed as waiving ally legal rights which the City may have to challenge the legality of a regional goal, objective, or plan provision. Comment: The proposed amendment is not related to regional goals and, therefore, the annual review requirement is not applicable to this proposal. Implementation Strategy 2, Page II-8 The Community Development Code (C. D. C.) shall provide quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map which may be initiated by affected parties on a semi-annual basis and approved it the City Council finds: a. The change is consistent with applicable plan policies; b. A change of physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation; or c. A mistake was made in the original land use designation. Comment: The proposed Plan Map Amendment is being submitted in accordance with the City's schedule for semi-annual reviews. The consistency of this application with applicable policies of the comprehensive plan will be demonstrated in this section of this report. The applicant is not aware of any mistake in the original land use designation of this property, however, considerable changes have occurred in this area which warrant a change in the designation of this site. The development of apartments across the street in the City of Beaverton at a density of 17.25 units per acre in the Conestoga Park apartments and the development of commercial uses immediately to the northeast have dramatically changed the character of this area. The major upgrading of Scholls Ferry Road which is under con- 01 11 r t, struction at this time is also a major change in the character of the neighborhood. Thus, a reconsideration of the land use designation of the subject property is appropriate. Polia 4.2.1, Awe 11-24 All development within the Tl!gard Urban Planning Area shall comply with applicable federal; state and regional water quality standards. Comment: Because the subject property is located near to a stream corridor, proper han- dling of storm drainage is essential to prevent pollution of the creek. The future multi- family project will be designed to comply with federal, state, and Unified Sewerage Agency standards to ensure that water quality is maintained. Policy 6.1.1, Page II-33 The City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels. Comment: See response under LCDC Goal 10. The designation of this site for multi-family residential use would increase the availability of affordable housing in the city and would assist the City in continued compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Policy 63.2, Page II-35 In the Tigard Community Development Code the City shall require a density transition whereby increased residential densities are adjacent to established areas in the following manner.• a. 21te density within 100 feet of each properly line shall not exceed over 25 percent over the density shown on the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent land unless there is an inter- vening road (Major Collector orArtertal in which case this provision shall not apply. b. Where the proposed development abuts an existing housing development, the housing types within 100 feet shall be compatible as defuted by the compatibility matrix in Chapter 18.26 of the Community Development Code. Comment: The adjacent properties to the south, west and east are zoned R-12. Thus, densities within 100 feet of the property lines of this site could not exceed 15 units per acre. This may require special design consideration in siting of open space and parking areas to ensure that this standard is satisfied. As a practical matter, the applicant does not anticipate that full R-25 development will occur on this site. Actual density of development is antici- pated to be approximately 18 units per acre. t i I SRI ' Policy 7.1.2. Page 1I-41 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that. a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including.• 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the proper- ty involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health De- partment approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm Drainage. b. Tate facilities are. 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed develop- ment; and 2 Designed to City standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. Policy 7.4.4, Page 11-45 77te City shall require that all new development be connected to an approved sanitary sewerage system- Po !Lq Z6.1, Page 11-48 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development that: a. The development be served by a water system having adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes; b. The development shall not reduce the water pressure in the area below a level adequate for fire protection purposes, and c. The applicable fire district review all applications. Comment: These policies will be fully applied at the time of application for Design Review. However, the ability of these policies to be met at the time of development is an appropriate issue for consideration in this application for a Plan Map Amendment. The availability of i l ~ all required utilities has been addressed earlier in this report. Sanitary sewer is available to service the site from a 15 inch trunk line which follows the south and west boundary lines of this property. Water, sewer, and storm drainage can all be provided to this site in a manner which will satisfy this policy. Water service is available from the 12 inch water main in Springwood Drive. This line has adequate capacity and pressure to provide for domestic and fire protection needs of future Medium High Density development on this site without impacting adjacent properties. All utilities will be provided concurrently with the develop- ment of this site, will be designed to City standards, and will be placed underground. Policy 8.1.1. Page II-SS The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Comment: The subject property fronts on Scholls Ferry Road. This street is an arterial street and is being improved to four traffic lanes and a center left turn lane along the front- age of this site at the present time. City staff have indicated that this roadway has adequate capacity to service the subject property under the proposed zoning. r Policy 83.3, Page II-SS The City shall require as a precondition to development approval that. a. Development abut a publicly dedicated street or have adequate access approved by the appropriate approval authority; b. Street right-of-way be dedicated where the street is substandard in width; C. The developer commit to the construction of streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards within the development; f. Transit stops, bus turnout lanes and shelters be provided when the proposed use of a type which generates transit ridership. Comment: The subject property fronts on a public street, Scholls Ferry Road. The appro- priate access point for this site is at the existing intersection of Conestoga Drive and Scholls Ferry Road. At the time of development, approval will be obtained from appropriate agencies for access to the site. Street right-of-way has already been dedicated along the property frontage to allow for the on-going widening of Scholls Ferry Road. All necessary on-site streets, curbs, and sidewalks will be constructed at the time, of development. The future developer will coordinate with the City and Tri-Met to determine whether transit improvements are appropriate for this site. Policy &ZZ Page II-58 The City shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by. a. Locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways; b. Incorporating provisions into the Community Development Code which require develop- ment proposals to provide transit facilities; and c. Supporting efforts by T i-Met and other groups to provide for the needs of the transporta- tion disadvantaged. Comment: The location of a land intensive use such as Medium-High Density Residential along Scholls Ferry Road where bus service is immediately available to the property is con- sistent with this policy. Policy 12.1.1. Page II-77 The City shall provide for housing densities in accordance with: a. The applicable plan policies. b. The applicable locational criteria. C. The applicable Community Development Code provisions. Comment: The applicable plan policies are discussed in this section of this report. The proposed R-25 zoning is consistentwith these policies. The future development of this site will be de- signed to comply with applicable Community Development Code provisions regarding density. The locational criteria for both the existing Medium Density Residential designa- tion and the proposed Medium High Density Residential designation are listed below. The discussion following these policies will demonstrate that the proposed Medium High Density Residential designation is the more appropriate designation to be applied to the subject site. Locational Criterion 2. Medium Density Residential, Page II- A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for medium density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. C (2) Areas which have direct access from collector or arterial streets. J k (3) Areas which are not subject to development limitations such as topography, flood- ing, poor drainage. (4) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (S) Areas within one half mile of public transportation. (6) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas i Locational Criterion 3. Medium-High and High Density Residential Page 11-79 A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the plan map. (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. ' (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (S) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacityfor additional development. 4 (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. Comment: (1) Commitment to Low Density Development The land use pattern surrounding the subject property is predominantly multi- family residential, as indicated on the land use map appended to this report. The only nearby single-family development is to the south and this subdivision is buffered from the subject property by the intervening park. C (2) Buffering from Low Density Residential Areas i I WIN C As mentioned above, the only low density development is to the south of this site. The park land which lies between the subject property and these homes provides a buffer area between single family and multi-family uses. This buffer- ing can be improved by on-site perimeter landscaping at the time of development. (3) Street Access This site has direct access from Scholls Ferry Road, an arterial street. (4) Development Constraints :j The subject property is not located in a flood plain, area of high water table, or known geological hazard area. The subject property has level terrain, is not located in a flood plain, drains well, and is not known to be subject to any other development hazard. (5) Adequacy of Existing Facilities As indicated earlier in this report, all necessary public facilities are available in j adequate capacity to service the proposed Medium-High Density Residential , C- development on the property. (6) Transit Availability Transit is available on Scholls Ferry Road at the subject property. Tri-Met Route 45 operates on Scholls Ferry Road to S.'W.121st Avenue. 1 (7) Access to Shopping A small commercial center (Parkside Shops and Offices) is located immediately to the northeast of this site across Scholls Ferry Road. A larger shopping center, the Greenway Town Center development, is located less than one-quarter mile approximately 1200 feet) to the west of the subject property. (8) Public or Private Open Space The subject property is contiguous to Englewood Park, a permanent open space, along its south and west boundaries. A review of the above facts leads to the conclusion that the subject property complies with all of the locational factors for the existing Medium Density Residential designa- tion. However, because the subject property has direct access to public transit, rather than just being within one-half mile, and because the site has convenient access to shopping and direct frontage on a public open space, this property also meets the more stringent criteria for the Medium High Density Residential designation. There- ;t fore, the approval of this requested Plan Map Amendment is supported by the Loca- tional Criteria. t y. CONCLUSION The proposed Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change have been demonstrated to be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals and with the policies of the Tigard Compre- hensive Plan. All necessary public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed Medium-High Density designation. The specific locational criteria for the Medium-High Density designation list eight factors to be considered in siting this land use. The subject site complies with all eight of these factors. Thus, this application meets with all pertinent crite- ria and approval is hereby requested. s z 'i f { i i i i r s i i I I NOMINEE r-. R sQ~S r' . ° CO ~t3A ~gp00D To Oltso aK s (351 USM) j mt va° SCHoM c4° g~ pj%B'K `n oD . 5 T MCB ~~g~iTS r ~O~g00D I,pOP lagsOOD ° APAgT3b8r qq~ TDB ~ A~ SROPP~G N S q0W V1~ ~TIr1G LAND IJ f y •y Qd V. I SI yz * ~~w 335 ti J y I i 10 -M I M I ~ L1 u e u ~ ~5 7 3 J - :b Z-10C l <e 4 r ® I 0 f. f -1 } ' O Z ~ V N1{ 0 ~ 68 a _ 7v f[ Z = i ml t ~ n £ 00 I c° rL1 N ~ OOZE 09 y9 Y ^ ~1 1 µ ~ ~ W p N 01. at A7. & gg41 V~~~ -e*- ssellA SO E'S5~ B9f SSe_~'' 7 u tye•,• ~ G` ylot M'._._._-_ tZ''11 SiS 8{f'9 s9 N 00 fi / r t I . 't 05/12/92 13:56 V503 584 7297 CITY OF T1GARD 9 001 Post-It'" brand fax transmittal memo 79M -f o1 p-a-Z C-01 Cox t F= NO: CPA 92-003/ZON 92-0001 D60 o _ C ~ FILE TITS: Robinson Pex# L . L± I': Chester Robinson U - ~ C - 10330 SW Schools Ferry Rd. ~~la 14 Tigard, OR 97223 REU"SIT: Comprehensive Flan Mendment CPA 92-001 Zone Change ZON 92-0001 Robinson. A request for Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change approval to allow redesignation of at 2.5S acre site from Medium Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential and a zone change from R-12 (residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (residential# 25 units/acre). RESPONSE: We (e e a Rched signatures) are recp=ending &hat the _rA2U0 t tog n a CQFI1p hg"3yC J2 an. and An Chi'I~1Q - f'rdm R-i 4-d R-25 IM.. denied.. REL%MMXDATr0V FOR DENIAL; The recommendation for denial is based primarily on but not limited to the issues below: 1. Sufficient documentation showing the required "Change in Circumstances" necessary to change the comprehensive Plan has not been presented. 'Z Sufficient documentation showing the potential traffic impact on Scholls Perry Road has not been presented. in addition, a traffic engineering impact study has not yet been performed approving the increase in density at the intersection of Conestoga and Scholls Ferry Rd. ED if the Comprehensive Plan was changed to allow the increase from R-12 to R-25 the increase would be out of step with the surrounding area. if the change from R-12 to R-25 is approved, we would recommend that : a.) The buffer zone requirements as outlined by the Unified Sewage Agency (USA) of Washington county for property adjoinIng :reeks and wet lands, be first established. b.) Then the next loo' of property adjoining the Englewood Park Greenway and or the USA see back requirements be limited to the R-12 designation to comply with the Residential Comprehensive Plan. 4 Extended Page RZOUFM FOR PUBLIC HEARING: In addition, we (see attached signatures) are requesting that a Public Hearing be held when a Development Application is filed to address, but be not limited to the following topics: * Environmental impact of the development on Fanno Creek. * Development desicgn structures need to comply with the Unified Sewage Agency (USA) of Washington County buffer zone requirements for properties adjoining creeks and wet lands. * Set back distance of development design structures from Fanno Creek need to be consistent with the adjoining apartments and all properties adjoining the park. * Development landscaping and sound barriers along the property lines need to provide maximum privacy and distance to the adjoining properties on Hazelwood Loop. * Development impact to the Englewood Park Greenway, including additional play equipment and (park maintenance expense required to support the increase in use. SITE LoChTXOM. CI A R D ~93 CPA 92-0001 alp I 1 IPD P, 6P % ee? W-6 A 1 1 \ 1 \ I Ia.a ...Iglu 1. n. ln. \ i ~1 . LI... nl.llta NNI.• ('d 41~~... ~~~.jI / 1 i..i 1111 ♦.IIN./• R` ^ `--L~~((.~ 111 1.I ..t1. 1. 11 •1.,111111. t/Il 1 I I I - ,IN fell 1.1..1 I( Y , 11/t111111 CITY OF TIGAI2D ,~~y83 884 7287 06ii2i82 19:68 F41,E NO. CFA 02-001 AAA sloe 1 1 % ! art? tl .dFk~ • p ..I' 12 14 is' lei 17 201 26 26 1 27 ago 321 36i I . t - - ' 42: _ _ 44' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (O C f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: May 12, 1992 DATE SUBMITTED: April 28-1992 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Comp Plan Ma PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Cam. Amendment - 92-0002 Anderson Hearin - A ril 20 1992 PREPARED BY: Offer Bewersdorf DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy ISSUE E E HE COUNCIL Should the City amend its Comprehensive Plan Map to redesignate a 7.73 acre four parcel site on the south side of Bull Mountain Road from commercial Professional (3.19 acres) and Low Density Residential (4.54 acres) to Medium- High Density Residential? - STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map amendment be denied. INFORMATION SUMMARY The subject properties are presently outside the City limits but within the City's planning area. The applicant has an application for annexation pending. The property is currently zoned R-6 (Residential 6 units per acre) by Washington County. The proposal satisfies or supports most City and State land use policies. However, to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the plan map requires that the City find there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community wh1ch affects the parcel or that there has been a mistake in the original designation of the plan. The Planning Commission could not make findings supporting either case and recommended denial. NPO 3 opposed the redesignation, as did a number of residents. Attached are the minutes of the Planning Commission's April 20, 1992 hearing, written testimony received at the hearing, the Planning Division staff report and the applicant's statement and traffic study. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny the Comprehensive Plan Map change and direct staff to prepare a resolution adopting the staff findings. 2. Approve the Comprehensive Plan Map change with appropriate findings and direct staff to prepare an ordinance. FISCAL NOTES No direct impacts The City of McF RLaN C. T I G A R D CPA 92°0002 !DW D N Site Area 8 U L ~ J v SITE Q~ i RD fCS~ DIg11o1 into t map r.pr. ~~jj'~''__ ll tIon toepil.d OT 16. CIIT et Tigtrd .tilitl tq C.agra- ,ern.tiet S{rtes pli. Is Gt5} refl..... I.for- motion pcrtraf.d lero q ~ ~ mar h. i.l.adtd It 11 ~ rted rill ./dilioa.l " V K 0 R T B l.clricrl ..d/or ~ ialtrpr.tetin dais .t d.tnnl.t/ IT 16. CitT of Tlgarl. {YPtPAf22) 400 6 i AGENDA ITEM C i i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: April 20, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. HEARING LOCATION: Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 92-0002 REQUEST: Plan Map Amendment from Commercial Professional (3.19 acres) and Low Density Residential (4.54 acres) to Medium-High Density Residential. APPLICANT/OWNER:Phyllis Anderson c/o Roger Anderson 8865 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 AGENT: Planning Resources, Inc. (Rick Givens) 6564 Lake Road Milwaukie, OR 97222 LOCATION: 11550 SW Bull Mountain Road and abutting properties. The frontage of the site extends from approximately 500 feet to 1100 feet west of SW Pacific Highway. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WCTM 2S1 10AC, Tax Lots 1300 and 1400 and WCTM 2S1 1ODB, Tax Lots 1600 and 2100 CURRENT ZONING: Washington County's R-6 zone (Residential, 6 units per acre) 2. Background Information The subject properties are within Washington County but are within the City of Tigard's planning area under the terms of the long standing intergovernmental agreement between the City and County. The City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Map designates tax lots 1300 and 1400 for Commercial Professional use and tax lots 1600 and 2100 for Low Density Residential use (See attached City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map). Washington MINI NPO #3 opposes the proposed Plan redesignation. The NPO questions whether there is adequate site distance along Bull Mountain Road to allow for intensive development of this property. The NPO also comments that access for this property should be coordinated with properties to the east of these properties. Those properties are also designated for commercial development. Vicki. Artis, a neighbor of the subject properties, has submitted a letter in opposition to the proposal. That letter is attached to this report. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, 9.1.2 and 9.1.3, and Chapter 12.1.1, the locational criteria for residential Plan designations; and the change or mistake quasi-judicial map amendment criteria of both Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.2 and Community Development Code Chapter 18.22. The Planning Division concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: 1. Statewide Planning Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement) and Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1 are supported because the City has adopted a citizen involvement program including review of all land use and development applications by City established -neighborhood planning organizations (NPOs) and nearby Washington County established community planning organizations (CPOs). NPO #3 and CPO #4B have been provided with an opportunity to review the proposal. The NPO's comments have been included in the staff report. No comments were received from the CPO. In addition, all public notice requirements related to this application have been satisfied. 2. Statewide Planning Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) and the quasi-judicial plan and zone change approval standards of Code Section 18.22.040 and Implementation Strategy 2 under Plan Policy 1.1.2 are supported because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies, and Community Development Code requirements to the review of this proposal, as described in this report. The City of Tigard has notified other affected units of government including Washington County, the Oregon Department of Transportation Highway Division, and the Oregon 3 !11 IN; Will Department of Land Conservation and Development of the proposal. Service and utility providing agencies have also been notified of the proposal. 3. Goal #9 (Economy of the State) may be supported by the proposal, although the proposal would reduce the City's inventory of developable commercial land, because: a. The reduction in Commercial Professional designated land proposed is not a large amount compared to the total amount of developable Commercial Professional designated land in the city. City Planning Division staff are not aware of any prior significant interest by others in development of tax lots 1300 and 1400 with uses permitted by the current Commercial Professional Plan designation, applied to a portion of the site, or development of other properties in the general area of the site with uses permitted by the C-P zone. The amount of undeveloped and under-developed Commercial Professional designated properties in the City may indicate that the proposed redesignation would not result in a shortage of a currently needed type of commercial opportunity. b. The proposed redesignation of the Commercial Professional portion of this site may be short sighted in that long range planning interests, such as the Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives program of Metro, urge the integration of employment opportunities in close proximity to housing opportunities. Removing the opportunity for development of office development of this site __.-'_which is close to a large, strictly residential area to the west may be viewed as contrary to those goals and objectives. On the other hand, allowing multi-family development on this site near other commercially zoned developable or developed but under-utilized properties may provide an attractive mix of land uses, thereby helping spur further commercial development in the general area, although these other nearby properties are designated for General Commercial use rattier than Professional Commercial use. In that way, the City may find that the proposed redesignation is supportive of the Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives through supporting existing commercial development adjacent to residential areas. 4. Goal #10 (Housing) would be supported because the proposal would provide for additional housing opportunities as promoted by the City's Comprehensive T gloom r Plan and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660, Division 7). The Metropolitan Housing Rule requires that the City maintain a minimum housing opportunity rate for developable land of 10 units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for single family and multi-family housing. Approval of the proposal would increase the inventory of developable residential land within the City's planning area by 3.19 acres and would provide increased housing opportunities on the City's developable residential lands by a total of 165 dwelling units. This would increase the City's housing opportunity rate further beyond the 10 unit per acre standard. Approval would also provide increased opportunities for multi-family development relative to single family only opportunities. 5. The proposal would be consistent with the public facility objectives of Goal #11 (Public Facilities and Services) because adequate public facilities presently exist at or near the site to serve development at the residential densities proposed by the requested Plan amendment. As noted by the Water District, however, special attention will need to be paid to the design of water facilities to serve development of this site due to the site's topography. The City's Engineering Department has echoed this concern with regard to future specific design considerations related to storm drainage and sanitary sewers, although the overall storm sewer system and the sanitary sewer systems have adequate capacity to serve development of the site under either the proposed or current Plan designations.. 6. Goal 012 (Transportation) and Goal #13 (Energy Conservation) -may--be satisfied through providing an opportunity for an intensive land use (multi-family development) to be adjacent to a major transportation corridor (Pacific Highway) that presently is served by Tri-Met buses. In addition, the proposed redesignation would provide housing opportunities near a substantial amount of existing retail and service opportunities (Canterbury Square shopping center). The convenience of nearby transit service and commercial opportunities to a higher density residential development can result in lesser needs for individual vehicle trips on overcrowded roads and a companion benefit of lesser energy resource use. Therefore, the land use pattern that would be furthered by the proposal would generally be supportive of these Statewide Goals although, as noted under 3a above, the current mix of Plan designations may also be seen as supportive of these Goals as well. The subject site is located along a major collector street, SW Bull Mountain Road. Specific design concerns related to access to this road will need to be considered in the development review process for future development of the site under either the current or proposed Plan designations. The Planning Division staff has determined that the proposal is largely consistent with applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 7. Plan Policy 6.1.1 is supported because the proposal would provide the opportunity for additional multi-family development and would increase the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. This is detailed in the discussion for Statewide Planning Goal 10 above. i i 8. Plan Policies 7.1.2 and 7.6.1 are satisfied because adequate public water, sewer, storm sewer, fire and rescue, and police service capacities are available to serve potential development on the subject properties. Specific concerns related to extension of utility services to the site or analysis of storm drainage provisions will need to be considered in the development review processes for future development of the site. 9. Plan Policy 8.1.1 commits the City to plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future development. It is difficult to determine whether the proposed Plan " redesignation would be supportive of this Policy because theoretical traffic generation figures for development of typical uses and intensities under the current and proposed Plan designations are relatively similar. The traffic study----submitted by the applicant assumes development of the current Commercial Professional designated portion of the site with medical and dental offices which has a high traffic potential. Because of this assumption, the traffic study is able to conclude that development under the proposed multi-family residential redesignation would result in less traffic than development under the current mix of Plan designations. While this might be true for a comparison of "worst case" development situations, it is difficult to make assumptions at this point with regard to types or intensities of development under either the current or proposed Plan designations. Questions related to adequacy of site distance and necessary street improvements should not be at issue with this proposal since the proposed redesignation would not appear to significantly affect traffic potential from the site. These issues will need to be reviewed closely under the site development review process for any development of the site. ~P EM I F 10. Plan Policies 8.2.2 and 9.1.2 would be satisfied because Tri-Met offers bus service on SW Pacific Highway approximately 500 feet from the eastern edge of the site. In addition, a variety of commercial and service opportunities exist along SW Pacific Highway relatively close to the site. Therefore, the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive type of development within close proximity to an existing public transit route and needed retail services supportive or residents' needs, thereby encouraging a reduction in energy consumption as compared to typical suburban development patterns. Offi 11. Plan Policy 9.1.3 would be supported because the proposed redesignation would allow for the possible development of passive solar designed multi-family residential units maximizing the site's south facing orientation thereby resulting in reduced energy consumption as compared to building residential units at a less favorably situated site. This is not to say that the same benefits could not result from development of various uses the current Plan designations. 12. The locational criteria specified in Plan Policy 12.1.1 for Medium-High Density Residential use are satisfied for the following reasons: a. The subject properties are not committed to low C density development. As the applicant's statement points out, the surrounding area contains quite a mixture of land uses including multi-family residential development immediately to the south. b. Density transition, buffering, and screening requirements-of the Community Development Code may be used to help make future development on the subject properties compatible with neighboring low density single family residences to the north and west. In addition, topography and existing trees could also be utilized to buffer multi-family usage on this site from those neighboring single family residential areas. C. The subject parcels have direct access to SW Bull Mountain Road, a major collector street. The subject properties are also in close proximity to SW Pacific Highway which is functionally classified as an arterial street. d. Serious development limitations affecting the properties, such as flood plains, excessively steep slopes or poor drainage, are not evident. 4 J e. Essential public facilities are present to serve future development on the properties, although 7 ? extensions of some service facilities to the site itself will be necessary with development of the site. It appears that these facilities and services have sufficient capacity to serve any increase in demand caused by development of the site. f. Public transit is available on SW Pacific Highway, approximately 500 feet from the site. g. The properties are located within one quarter mile of commercial service and retail opportunities in the Canterbury Square shopping center to the north on Pacific Highway, as well as the limited j commercial opportunities provided at the nearby Texaco site as well as opportunities that may be developed on the C-P zoned property directly to the east of the site. h. The applicants anticipate that private open space as well as recreational facilities will be provided as part of development of the site. There is no existing or planned public or private open space anywhere near the subject site. 13. In order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps, the City must also find that there is evidence of a physical change in the neighborhood or community which affects the subject parcel. Alternatively, the City must find that there has been a mistake or inconsistency made in the original designation of the parcel (Comprehensive Plan, Volume 2, Policy 1.1.1; 'Impleineaitatioh Strategy 2; Community Development Cade Section 18.22.040(A)). The applicant's statement concedes that no mistake was made in the original designation of the site with the Low Density Residential and Commercial Professional Plan designations. The applicant argues, however, that the development of the Wellington Estates complex which occurred subsequent to the original designation of the subject properties with their current Plan designations constitutes a substantial change in circumstances in the neighborhood of the site that affects the subject properties. The applicant's statement says that "...the introduction of apartment development on the Wellington Estates site has served to establish multi-family residential as the appropriate land use in this area of the city." While staff concedes that the rezoning of the Wellington Estates site and the subsequent development of apartments on the Wellington site was certainly a change in Q i Q I ME circumstances affecting this area, it is not clear how these prior activities now affect the subject property in ways that dictate a change in the designation of the subject site. Wellington Estates receives access from a different street than the subject properties. In addition, the southern slope of Bull Mountain in this area is fairly steep such that it is difficult to say that the Wellington Estates site and the subject properties are closely physically related in a way that should require linking the uses of these different sites. In summary, staff does not find that the changes in this area subsequent to the designation of the subject properties sufficiently affect the subject properties in ways that argue for the requested redesignation to Medium-High Density Residential Plan designation. C. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION While positive findings, or at worst inconclusive findings, may be made for most of the applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval criteria applicable to this proposal, staff does not find that there any really strong arguments in support of the proposed redesignation that would justify the change requested. Positive findings could also be made relative to the Plan Policies and locational criteria for the existing Commercial Professional and Low-density Residential Plan designations already applied to the site as well. In addition, persuasive evidence has not been presented showing that there has been a significant enough change in circumstances affecting this site to support the requested redesignation. It is important to note that the Comprehensive Plan requires this finding of change (or a mistake in the original designation) so as to require a substantial burden of proof that must be overcome to unseat the certainty provided by the existing designations. The certainty provided by the existing Plan designation is obviously important for the expectations of nearby neighbors and property owners and should only be unseated if a substantial public interest can be served by the requested change. Staff finds that this burden of proof of has not been satisfied. Therefore, based upon the findings and conclusions listed above, the Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation for denial of the request to redesignate the subject properties with the Medium-High Density Residential Comprehensive Plan Map designation. I PREP BY: Jer fer APPROVE BY: Dick Bew rff Z7 Ass a o Planner Senior anner 1 The City of Du C. T I GAR D CI CPA 92-0002 LDYt' D Site Area Al Sr. a u L ~o. SITE a~ RD 3 oil llot late ! MOP ropraaaa - \j'- tT U !tan compiled by The my c7~ el 1111rl atllltlag Caegra- plla lafarnatfaa systafft CIS) uiteara, W a r- teatiae portrayal life aay be lataod to be and rfFr add i tisail N O R T H taaLaical aid/or i bate2allra bola as ea arn Ual ►y d. the Clti of floor (tlPCPAd2l) p 100 (021211/2) i 00 -ij 4t'' ~1 ~ sn ~ quo A~HINGT h - ~ I t _ r .r ss ' z / ~ r p,reuvE raY sr G~ c rlCw#DSKIT CT. i M D B t s Ia HIN c` J Q4 cahtER Y $ w, 0~OI1lLY G! y,ri VISTA y.faRWRD C~ •i VI_T Sr 1# IY[ Cas r ~ 9 ' ~ ,rT S.r. #tLDwL.~ sr. '!s a. ~s Y. _ O H ax y• a1 W. -Aov V \ ~ M s w. o}~ A h --Y IT 15 s~ r - 16 _ I. ~ u avE I 1 t , p~ ^ rrT-'T1T • •C`\111 ~.u ~ 21.+ APP LAND -z 1 r• MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD T0: Jerry Offer, Planning Divisjon April 13, 1992 FROM: Randy Wooley, City Enginee~ SUBJECT: CPA 92-0002/ZON 92-0002 (Anderson) Findings: 1. STREETS: A traffic report was submitted by the applicant. The report concludes that the proposed zoning would generate less traffic than the existing zoning. The report assumes that, under existing zoning, the professional-commercial area would be developed as medical offices. However, the professional- commercial zoning allows a variety of office-type development. If reviewed under a more general type of office development, it appears that potential traffic generation is similar under both existing and proposed zoning. Under regional and statewide planning goals, we are being encouraged to develop plans whit. decrease the need for auto- dependent travel. We are being encouraged to develop plans which provide better opportunities for bicycle and pedestrian travel and which reduce the vehicle miles traveled between homes and business opportunities. One way to achieve these goals is to provide a greater integration of business and residential areas in each neighborhood. The proposed zone change appears to be counter to these goals. Currently, the Bull Mountain area is all residential in character. As a result, Bull Mountain residents must use Pacific Highway and Beef Bend Road for virtually all work and business trips. The existing C-P zoning on the eazt edge of Bull Mountain is the only potential site for office-type services to be provided in the Bull Mountain neighborhood under current zoning. 2. UTILITIES: At the time of development of the site, special attention will need to be given to the design of sanitary sewers and storm drainage. Pumping may be necessary to connect portions of the property to the sanitary sewer. Storm drainage facilities will need to be provided to prevent overloading of downstream lines in King City. These design needs are similar under either existing or proposed zoning. Recommendations: Due to the transportation planning concerns, we recommend that the existing commercial zoning be retained, unless suitable sites can be found to establish commercial zoning elsewhere on Bull Mountain. rw/cpa92-2 {Y V i i Vicki Artis RECEIVED PLANNING 11670 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 APR G 7 1992 April 4,1992 Re: Zone change and redesignation of property owned by Phyllis Anderson: FILE NO. CPA 92-00027Zon 92-0002 Dear Sir or Madam: I respectfully submit my strong disapproval of the zone change and density redesignation of Phyllis Anderson's property on Bull Mountain Road. I have been Phyllis's neighbor for fifteen years. In that time, I have watched the area change, step by step, zone change by zone change, redesignation by reclassification. This area of Bull Mountain was a peaceful retreat of single family homes. The children.used to play in the orchard across 3 the street. A housing development has replaced the orchard. My view of Mount St Helens was replaced by a two story adult care home. lily uphill neighbors sold out to a different adult care service. Loud radios, traffic noise, mower noise and squealing tires now replace the bird songs and quiet. What was once a peaceful, upscale retreat from the city has been destroyed, zone change by redesignation. There are areas around Portland that jealously guard their zoning restrictions. Tigard has the opportunity now to decide if money or livability will motivate its actions. Developers seek the ability to build and sell more units and Tigard seeks to increase its tax base. However, high income ormers of high value Bull Mountain property, owners who vote for school budgets, road improvements and parks, will not remain if surrounded by noise and apartments. They can go anywhere for that. I have gone through changes in circumstances similar to my good neighbor Phyllis. Please don't push me out of my home and my neighborhood. Please don't make me seek anoth:ez- community that stands by its zoning and defends its density restrictions. e I strongly oppose a redesignation from Washington County Low-Density Residential to Tigard Medium-high Density Residential. I strongly oppose a zone change from 6 units per acre to 25 units per acre. I strongly oppose the future destruction of livability in my neighborhood. There are good changes and bad changes. This is a bad change. Very trul yours, Vicki Ar is j 1 3 } PUBLIC HEARING CLOSE 1 o Commissioner Boone said he was inclined to approve the reques as the _ location seemed appropriate. He did not believe the ttaff' impact would be significant. o Commissioner Moore agreed the location would be a opriate, but he was c cerned about the transportation issues. He d not favor changing the ning, as there was not a significant nge in circumstances. o Commissio r Hawley did not favor cha ng the zoning, since the land is developing a ording to the origin designation. o Commissioner Barb advised t the traffic on Scholls Ferry Road was unbelievably poor. di of feel that there would be an increase of pedestrian activity to down on vehicle traffic. She favored denying the request since th di of appear to be a significant change in circumstances. o Commissioner wley noted that ODO s working to improve the situation on Scholls erry Road, and if there is increase in the density, it f may and ine the improvements being made. o Pr dent Fyre said that although the location pears to be ideal for 'gh density, there has not been a significant c ge in circumstances. e favored denial of the request. Commissioner Moore moved and Commissioner Hawley seconde to forward a recommendation to City Council to deny CPA 92-0001 and ZO 2-0001 based on the findings and conclusions of staff. Motion passed by ~jority vote of Commissioners present, with Commissioner, Boone voting "Nay." 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA, 92-bOb2 A QERSO~dt~O_#3] A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendmdnt approval to redesignate a 7.73 acre site from Professional Commercial and Low Density Residential to Medium-High Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, & 13; Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, 9.1.1, 9.1.3, & 12.1.1; Community Development Code Chapters 18.22 & 18.32. LOCATION: South side of Bull Mountain Road, between 500 and 110 feet west of Pacific Highway. (WCTM 2S1 IOAC, tax lots 1300 and 1400, and 2S1 IOBD, tax lots 1600 and 2100) Commissioner Hawley reported that she is acquainted with the author of a letter received in opposition to this application. She stated it would not affect her decision on this item. t PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 5 s o Associate Plan ) Jerry offer explained that th )ubject property is outside the city limits; therefore, there is no Zone Change being requested. He described the location and current designations for this`' site. He discussed the comments received, noting the "no comment" received from Tigard School District. tie advised NPO #3 and CPO #4 expressed concern regarding whether there is adequate site distance along Bull Mountain Road to allow for intensive development of the property as well as access issues. He said staff found that statewide goals were met by this application, and opportunities would be increased. Goal 9, dealing with economic development, might be met by this development. However, he warned this designation would reduce the amount of commercially developable properties in the city. He pointed out some transportation difficulties and compared the problems occurring with both the current designation and proposed designation. Concerning the change in circumstances in the neighborhood, he said staff did not find there was a significant enough change to justify a change in designation. He advised that a change in the land use designation would upset some of the expectations of the adjacent property owners. He stated that staff recommended denial of the request. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Rich Given, Planning Resources, Inc., spoke on behalf of the applicants. He discussed the change of circumstances. He spoke about the demand for commercial property. He stated that multi-family residential property is in more demand than professional office space. He pointed out the amenities and services which make the site ideally suited for high-density development. He advised there would be less impact on the traffic if developed as high-density residential as opposed to commercial office type development. o Commissioner Hawley requested clarification regarding the traffic analysis. Mr. Given explained the difference in overall traffic and peak hour traffic volume. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Bruce Strahan, 11720 SW Bull Mountain Road, questioned the market demand for rental housing. He advised there was a high incidence of vacancy indicating there is not necessarily a need for rental housing. He expressed concern that his property would be adversely affected if this type of development were put in. He preferred low-density residential zoning which would be more appropriate for the area. o Cal Woolery, 1235,6 SW 132nd Ct., stated he favored having an adequate buffer between commercial /professional areas and residential neighborhoods. o Ellen Dickey, 14565 SW McFarland, member of CPO 4, stated her residence is located on a half-acre lot zoned R-2. She read a statement expressing opposition to increasing the density levels in the subject area. She did not believe nearby neighborhoods of Wellington Estate PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 6 F i i Apartments ane jng City Apartments are comparz a to the subject Bull Mountain area. She cited issues of access, amenities, and public transportation. She commented on the safety problems brought about by the steepness of Bull Mountain Road and limited access. o Ken Dickey, 14565 SW McFarland, discussed the current traffic congestion and dangers to pedestrians with increased volumes. He expressed concern about the lack of parks available for children who would live in the proposed apartment complex. He discussed the problems with ground water flow. o Shirley Burback, 14520 SW McFarland, stated she disapproved of the proposed amendment. She favored keeping Tigard livable and not increasing density with the accompanying traffic congestion. She spoke about the overcrowding in California to point out the undesirable aspects of increasing density. She further requested that long range planning be considered to include providing employment opportunities for city residents. o Lavelle Allison, 11830 SW Wildwood, spoke from the audience stating she agreed with what the previous speakers had said. o Paul Whitney, 12035 SW Bull Mountain Road, spoke about his interest in getting involved and learning about the planning process. He said piecemeal annexation is not going to give Tigard orderly development. He talked about the expectation of certainty which residents have based on the zoning. He asked the Commissioners to maintain the zoning which the residents are depending on. o Dan Mercer, 12195 SW Wildwood, said he chose the area because of the pleasant surroundings and single family housing. He opposed building multi-family housing in this area. Concerning the traffic issues, he said the area between McDonald and Beef Bend Road is "confusion" and a disaster from a planning point of view. He said adding density would bring increased traffic problems. o Beverly Froude, 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road, distributed copies of a letter she received this date from a concerned resident, Herbert A. Moreno (Exhibit D). She agreed with the previous comments, and asked the Commission to deny the request based on the two criteria: 1) there has not been a change in circumstances, and 2) there was not a mistake in original zoning. She spoke about the unsafe situation on Bull Mountain Road for pedestrians due to lack of sidewalks. o Miriam Stover, 14545 SW Peachtree Drive, was not present, but a letter was presented on her behalf (Exhibit E). o Walter Groce, 15300 SW Cabernet Drive, talked about the approximately 120 acres of land currently being processed. He said when it is developed, there will be a tremendous impact on traffic. He commented there were more than enough apartment complexes in Tigard. } i f PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 7 { a C. i p 11, APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL o He noted that the area is in transition from rural to city. He was confident that the necessary improvements will be made and paid for by development. He provided examples to show there had been a change in the character of this property, and he said they were willing to ensure the proper buffer. He again pointed to the need for apartments and the benefits to the community. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Boone advised he was not convinced zoning should be changed. o Commissioner Moore did not find sufficient reason to change the zoning. o Commissioner Hawley did not favor the high density, as there had not been a significant change. She agreed with previous comments concerning the expectations of certainty, and she did not favored changing the Comp Plan except for very good reason. o Commissioner Barber cited examples of changes to the area which were not popular. She noted that people want to get the most out of their property. She said she would prefer to see the portion zoned CP changed to Residential, perhaps R-?. She did not favor medium high density and she said she favored denial of the request. o President Fyre agreed with Commissioner Barber. . o Discussion followed concerning whether it would be appropriate to deny the request but approve a different zoning combination. Associate Planner Offer recommended Commissioners take action only on the request as it-was posted in the notice. * Commissioner Boone moved and Commissioner Barber seconded to forward a recommendation to City Council to deny CPA 92-0002. Motion passed by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 6. ER o Commissioner discussed the previous decis' (Apri-1 l meet on the Community Come Z Plan Des' a#' -C Zoning District). She stated she would like to r opinion concerning the size of grocery stores 1o under Conditio Discussion followed and - i e the decision was appropriate as ied. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 20, 1992 PAGE 8 I 1 5 April 1992 i t'P04B Bull Mountain -king City -Tigard c/o Larry Westerman. Secretary Treasurer 13665 SW Fern Street Tigard OR 97223 To the Tigard Planning Department. Re: CPA92-0002 Anderson The steering committee of CP04B has reviewed the above-referenced application. We have grave concerns about the advisability of this proposed zone change. The subject site presents serious problems for future development, and we feel that the proposal to change the zoning to R25 will exacerbate these problems, rather than hasten their solution. Traffic conditions today on Bull Mountain Road are quite hazardous, owing to the steep grades, inadequate sight distance, and substandard roadway construction. The portion of this street in the vicinity of the subject property is particularly problematic, as traffic tends to travel at excessive speeds in this section, both coming down the hill (traveling to the cast) and entering from Pacific Highway (heading west). The slight bend in the road just at McFarland Boulevard limits sight distance. Pedestrian traffic in this vicinity is also hazardous owing to the Jack of sidewalks. In our opinion, the present conditions, and the development plans of which we are aware, do little to solve this serious access problem for the Anderson property. The projected traffic demands of this property, whether developed at the current CP zone, or in the requested R25 zone, are far in excess of that which can be safely admitted onto Bull Mountain Road at the site, absent major improvements to the roadway extending a considerable distance from the road frontage of this property. At present, the eastern portion of the Anderson is adjacent to another sizable lot zoned for CP. Even assuming the access problems for the lot to the east of tax lot 1400 are solved, the viability of a single 3-acre commercial/professional site at this location must be considered. The planning commission must weigh the loss of potential worth to be suffered by the adjacent property if the CP zone block is cut in half. In our opinion, if the traffic flow problems are to be solved at all for this site, it must be by means of a comprehensive solution which involves all the Anderson property (tax lots 1300 and 1400,2S] JOAC, and lots 1600 and 2100.251 JOBD), and the adjacent CP property to the east. To reiterate, we feel that the application, while it has certain merits when considered in isolation from its surrounding, is not an safe, adequate, or appropriate request in the context of the existing traffic situation on Bull Mountain Road. We urge that this application be disapproved, and that a more comprehensive approach to the land use and traffic flow in this area be undertaken. Yours truly, Larry sterman t y A/1 I- '2't ArT, i BALL, .JAN I K & NOVACK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE MAIN PLACE 101 S.W. MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100 10- FLOOR,1101 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.N." PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-3274 WASHINGTON, D.C.20004 TELEPHONE (503) 228-2525 TELEPHONE 1202) 638-3307 ROBERT S. BALL TELECOPY (503) 295-1058 TELECOPY (202) 763-6947 April 20, 1992 Planning Commission City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CPA and ZC 92-0002 Ladies/Gentlemen: I reside at 12765 SW Bull Mountain Road. As a 24 year resident on Bull Mountain, I ask the Planning Commission to deny the referenced rezone and comprehensive plan amendment applications. The Bull Mountain area is committed to single family use. The neighborhood was actively involved in hearing processes which led to Country R-6 designations and similar designations in the City. The designations of properties on the periphery of the neighborhood are carefully interconnected to designations of the rest of the neighborhood. Hundreds of hours of citizen and governmental planning efforts led to planning and zoning designations upon which our community could rely. The City's criteria for quasi-judicial amendments were designed to preserve the integrity of those designations in the absence of compelling reasons for change. No compelling reasons for change exist here. The physical change relied upon by the applicant is the rezoning and development of Wellington Estates. If the Comprehensive Plan is continually amended on the basis of prior amendments, all land use designations become unstable. One change doesn't compel others. r Reduced to its simplest proposition, the applicant's case is that because Wellington Estates was developed, these proposed changes should be granted. Wellington Estates is disconnected from the neighborhood zoning pattern we seek to preserve. It is located on Beef Bend Road, not Bull Mountain Road. It is topographically separate from most of Bull Mountain and even from the applicant's property. 5. 5ubmi f~G( 1110 1 211 ~ •i ZEN BALL, .JAN 1 K & NOVACK Planning Commission, City of Tigard April 20, 1992 Page 2 The Wellington Estates property apparently was rezoned from CP to R-40. Here, the applicant also seeks to use that development as precedent for a request to rezone approximately 4.5 acres of the subject property from R-6 to R-25. With that logic, none of the low density development on Bull Mountain is safe from higher density designations. The application also contains no evidentiary support for the proposition that the applicant's C-G property is, at approximately 3 acres, too small for development of an "office park environment in this area." As I recall, the applicant sought a C-G designation for that property; it was obviously the same size when it was so-designated. The development of Wellington Estates has.nothing to do with whether C-G is appropriate for the applicant's property. The applicant has submitted no information which either justifies a change or is legally sufficient to meet the burden of proof for a change. I urge that the applications be denied. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 1 `D L r S Robert S. Ball ew/rsb/general/TigardC.420 111,11: M l , i April 20, 1992 Tigard City Council i Tigard Civic Center 13125 S. :d. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 s A change of ZONING of the 7.73 acre on Bull 11-ft Rd. from R 4.5 to R-25 would adversely affect the property valuue of my home and the safety of my neighborhood. I chose the Shadow Hills development on Bull Mt, because it was located in a quiet resideni7ial neighborhood. A large apartment complex is not in keeping with character of the immediate neighborhood, and the infrastructure is not in place to support the additional vehicles. A change of zoning should only"-_be agreed upon if it enhances a neighborhood or'provides needed convienc.es. This ZONE change would do neither. Yours Truely, Mr. Herbert A Moreno 14590 S.W. McFarland Tigard, Or. 97224 c April 20, 1992 Tigard City Council Tigard Civic Center 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 r~ A change of ZONING of the 7.73 acre on Bull4t Rd. from R 4.5 to R-25 would adversely affect the property valuue of my home and the safety of my neighborhood. I chose the Shadow Hills development on Bull Mt, because it was located in a quiet resideni7ial neighborhood. A large apartment complex is not in keeping with character of the immediate neighborhood, and the infrastructure is ( not in place to support the additional vehicles. A change of zoning should only'--be agreed upon if it enhances a neighborhood orprovides needed conviences. This ZONE change would do neither. Yours Tru^el y , 6D Al t Mr. Herbert A Moreno 14590 S.W. McFarland Tigard, Or. 97224 s "s S~,bm~d -In PC. 4- PP-ID- 1// /1/,9 +•VY ..'•r~BC~tTCC 1Jr1VCY r 3ryt;N r f 't )r C ~~r;(j~ i 14545' S. v i + Sig8T~~ Oregon 97224 ~X -'.itt~f{A ~~ff `~1 a k~r~+~t r~ . I 5;~ Z- :~'C' Y p • 4 r \/v W ~r { a 't -i'~ Y~f I,. 4 - : ~31~ .'iii: .1. .•.i ey:..~7. Jul^.. ~ 11 !r J ~I~i~ • ` ! `til: •.y.r•S ;S'. . r' r\, Svbmifid 4 PC ~ i I I 't i f i COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT ; AND ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION i S.W. BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD Tigard, Oregon k Prepared for: Mrs. Phyllis Anderson f Prepared by: f l Planning Resources, Inc. February, 1992 C C INTRODUCTION: This application seeks approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 7.73 acres of land located on Bull Mountain Road near Highway 99W. The subject property consists of four parcels: Tax Lots 1300 and 1400 of Assessor's Map 2S 1 10 AC, which are zoned C-P, Professional Commercial, and Tax Lots 1600 and 2100 of Assessor's Map 2S 1 10 BD, which are currently pending annexation to the City of Tigard and are zoned with Washington County's R-6 district (Residential - 6 Units Per Acre). The appli- cant is requesting that the City's Medium-High Density Residential comprehensive plan designation be applied to these properties and that they be zoned R-25. This report has been prepared on the behalf of the owner of the subject property, Mrs. Phyllis Anderson. This report will demonstrate that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change are consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and the policies of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. EXISTING LAND USE: A. Site: Two single-family dwellings are presently located on the subject property. The applicant's residence is situated on Tax Lot 2100. A rental home is located on Tax Lot 1300. The balance of the site is vacant. B. Adjacent Properties: East: The property to the east of the subject site is zoned General Commercial. A service station and car wash are located in the southwest quadrant of the Bull Moun- tain/Pacific Highway intersection. A restaurant building, currently vacant, is located between the subject site and the service station. Christ the King Lutheran Church is located on the north side of Bull Mountain Road at this intersection. North: Two parcels are located immediately to the north, across Bull Mountain Road, from the subject property. One parcel is developed with St. John's Episcopal Church and the other contains one single-family dwelling on a large, redevelopable parcel. This area is zoned R-2. West: This area is single-family residential in character and is zoned R-6 by Washing- ton County. The adjoining parcels are large lots which are capabje of being rede- veloped to higher densities under existing zoning. South: Property to the southwest of this site, at the intersection of Beef Bend Road and Pacific Highway, is zoned R-40, High Density Residential. This parcel is de- C veloped with the Wellington Estates apartment complex. To the west of this apart- ment complex a new subdivision, Helm Heights, has been recently constructed. Lots in this development are presently vacant. i PHYSICAL FEATURES: The subject property is located on a hillside which slopes to the southeast. Grades on this hillside are moderate, being in the range of 15 to 25 percent. The front portion of this site is open field, with back half being wooded with a mixture of Douglas fir and deciduous trees. PUBLIC FACILITIES: A. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to serve this site from an eight inch line stubbed to the north property line of the new Hume Heights subdivision or from the existing sewer line in Beef Bend Road. Access to sewer will depend upon obtaining easements from adjoining property owners at the time of development. There are no capacity problems in either line size or treatment plant facilities anticipated in serving the subject property under the proposed R-25 zoning. B. Water Service: Tigard Water District provides water service to the Bull Mountain area. Existing water lines in Bull Mountain Road along the street frontage of the subject property are six inches in size. A twelve inch water main is located in Pacific Highway at the Bull Mountain Road intersection, approximately 600 feet east of the subject property. It is likely that a new water line would need to be extended from this main to the subject property in order to service the proposed multi-family develop- ment. This improvement, if required by the Water District, would be provided concur- rent with the development of this site. C. Storm Sewer: Storm drainage in this area is presently limited to roadside ditches with culverts under roadways. As mentioned previously, the subject property slopes to the southeast, towards King City. In order to accommodate development on this site, a storm drainage system will need to be installed to carry water to the natural drainage- way at the Beef Bend Road/Pacific Highway intersection. A storm water detention system may be required in order to limit the rate of runoff to pre-development levels and mitigate potential impacts upon downstream properties. The most likely means of accomplishing this detention would be to install an oversized storm pipe in one portion of the on-site system and, through the use of a restricted outlet pipe, use this storage capacity in the pipe to detain storm water during peak rainfall periods. This issue would be addressed in detail at the time of development. D. Streets: Bull Mountain Road is a paved two lane street along the project frontage. Its intersection with Pacific Highway is fully signallized. Frontage improvements to the roadway are planned to be installed at the time of development to bring the roadway surface to City standards. A separate traffic study has been prepared to assess the impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment and Zone Change upon this roadway and the intersection with Pacific Highway. Please see this attached report for a detailed discussion of these issues. J MEW COMPLIANCE WITH STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS: The following LCDC Statewide Planning Goals are applicable to this proposed Zone Change and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application: Goal #10: Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, the region and the state. Comment: This proposal would increase the potential for providing adequate housing to meet projected needs in the City of Tigard. At the present time, 4.54 acres of the property are zoned R-6 which allows for the development of low density housing at a maximum of six units per acre (27 units). The proposed zoning would increase this maximum housing potential to twenty-five units per acre (113 units). The 3.19 acres of C-P zoned property would also be zoned R-25 under this proposal, allowing for a maximum of 75 dwelling units. Thus, the theoretical potential for provision of housing associated with this site would increase from 27 units to 192 units. As a practical matter, however, multi- family developments in this area of the City rarely exceed 18 units per acre. The Metropolitan Housing Rule (O.A.R. 660-07) interprets Goal 10 for the Portland Metropolitan Area. This Rule requires that the City of Tigard main- tain a vacant land inventory which averages 10 housing units per acre and maintains a 50-50 mix of single-family to multi-family development. According to staff, this requirement is currently met by the City, but is very close. If the City is to have flexibility to consider Plan Amendment proposals from residen- tial to other plan designations or from higher to lower residential designations, a cushion is needed which will provide for continued compliance with this standard. The proposed Plan Amendment will assist the City in its continued compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Goal #11: Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development. Comment: At issue under this Goal is whether the proposed multi-family residential desig- nation is consistent with the level of public facilities and services which are presently available to the site or which can be made available at the time of development. As discussed in the preceding section of this report, adequate water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and transportation facilities can be made available to service the proposed R-25 zoning for this property. Thus, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Goal 11. Goal #12: Provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Comment: The designation of this site for Medium-High Density Residential development is consistent with Goal 12. Bull Mountain Road is a major collector street and I C is, thus, suited for providing access to R-25 zoned properties. The site is in close proximity to Pacific Highway, a major arterial, and has quick access to shopping and employment areas. Tri-Met bus service is available on Pacific Highway approximately 600 feet from the subject site. Goal? 13: Conserve eneigy. Comment: Multi-family residential development is a very energy efficient residential land use. Because units share common walls, energy loss is greatly reduced as compared with traditional single-family detached homes. Thus, the proposed Plan Amendment and Zone Change will foster a greater conservation of energy for home heating than does the existing designation. Further, the location of multi-family development in an area with quick access to public transit and close to the arterial system which accesses nearby commercial areas is condu- cive to conservation of energy for transportation requirements. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Policy 1.1.2. Page It The Comprehensive Plan and each of its elements shall be opened for amendments that consid- er compliance with the plans of the Metropolitan Service District (MSD) or its successor on an annual basis, and may be so amended or revised if deemed necessary by the City Council. Annual amendment and revision for compliance with the above regional goals, objectives and plans shall be consistent with any schedule for reopening of local plans approved by the Lad Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). This provision is not to be construed as waiving any legal rights which the City may have to challenge the legality of a regional goal, objective, orplan provision. Comment: The proposed amendment is not related to regional goals and, therefore, the annual review requirement is not applicable to this proposal. Implementation Strategy Z Page IT8 The Community Development Code (C.D.C.) shall provide quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map which may be initiated by affected parties on a semi-annual basis and approved it the City Council finds: a. The change is consistent with applicable plan policies, b. A change of physical cirs umstances has occurred since the original designation; or c. A mistake was made in the original land use designation. I 01 Comment: The proposed Plan Map Amendment is being submitted in accordance with the City's schedule for semi-annual reviews. The consistency of this application with applicable policies of the comprehensive plan will be demonstrated in this section of this report. The applicant is not aware of any mistake in the original land use designation of this property, however, considerable changes have occurred in this area which warrant a change in the designation of this site. The Wellington Estates project was developed along the southern boundary of the subject property and introduced High Density Residential development in this area of the city. A review of the Zoning District Map dated May 9, 1983 (As revised November 1983) indicates that this parcel was, originally designated C-P, Professional Of- fice. Since that time, the City has revised the zoning to R-40. The elimination of this area of potential office development seriously erodes the ability of developing an office park envi- ronment in this area. The applicant's property which is zoned C-G is only about three acres in size and is too small to attract this type of development in an area considerably removed from other office uses. The introduction of apartment development on the Wellington states site has served to establish multi-family residential as the appropriate land use in this area of the city. Policy 6.1.1. Page 11-33 The City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels. Comment: See response under LCDC Goal 10. The designation of this site for multi-family residential use would increase the availability of affordable housing in the city and would assist the City in continued compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. Policy 7.1.Z Page 11-41 The City shall require as a pre-condition to development approval that. a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including.- 1. Public eater; 2 Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the proper- ty involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health De- partment approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm Drainage. 1` N, 1: :1 1 b. The facilities are. 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed develop- ment, and 2 Designed to City standards. C. All new development utilities to be placed underground. and Policy 7.6.1. Rage 11-48 Me City shall require as a pre-condition to development that. a. The development be served by a water system having adequate water pressure for fire protection purposes, b. The development shall not reduce the water pressure in the area below a level adequate for fire protection purposes, and c. The applicable fire district review all applications Comment: 'T'hese policies should be fully applied at the time of application for Design Review. However, the ability of these policies to be met at the time of development is an appropriate issue for consideration in this application for a Plan Map Amendment. The availability of all required utilities has been addressed earlier in this report. Water, sewer, and storm drainage can all be provided to this site in a manner which will satisfy this policy. The utilities will be provided concurrently with the development of this site, will be designed to City standards, and will be placed underground. Water service to the site will need to be upgraded to maintain fire protection. This can be accomplished by constructing a new water line in Bull Mountain Road to connect to the 12 inch main at Pacific Highway. This can be accomplished at the time of development. Policy 8.1.1. Page 11-55 ?lie City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Comment: The traffic study submitted with this application demonstrates that the proposed Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change will result in a land use pattern which is consistent with the capacities of roadways within this area of the city. was= Policy 8.2 2, Page II-58 The City shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by. a. Locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways, b. Incorporating provisions into the Community Development Code which require develop- ment proposals to provide transit facilities; and c. Supporting efforts by TH-Met and other groups to provide for the needs of the transporta- tion disadvantaged Comment: The location of a land intensive use such as Medium-High Density Residential in close proximity to the existing transit line on Pacific Highway is consistent with this policy. The subject property is within 600 feet of this intersection. Policy 9.1.1. Page II-62 The City shall encourage a reduction in energy consumption by increased opportunities for energy conservation and the production of energy from alternative sources. and Policy 9.1.3. Page II-62 The City shall encourage land use development which emphasizes sound energy conservation, design and construction. Comment: These issues are most appropriately addressed at the Design Review stage, however, the subject property is located on a south facing slope which affords opportunities for use of passive solar energy in the design of the future development. The designation of this site for multi-family development would allow the most efficient utilization of this energy source. Policy 12.1.1. Page II-77 The City shall provide for housing densities in accordance with: a. The applicable plan policies. C b. The applicable locational criteria. C. The applicable Community Development Code provisions. t Comment: The applicable plan policies are discussed in this section of this report. The proposed R-25 zoning is consistent with these policies. The locational criteria for the Medium High Density Residential designation are discussed below. The future develop- ; ment of this site will be designed to comply with applicable Community Development Code provisions regarding density. Locatzonal Criterion 3. Medium-High and High Density Residential, Fa e 11- 79 A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on S. the plan map. (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. Comment: The surrounding land use pattern contains a mixture of land uses including: commercial, High Density Residential, churches, and single-family dwellings on large lots. The primary orientation of this property in terms of access and view is towards Pacific Highway and away from the adjacent single- j family areas. Thus, this site and its immediate surrounding area are not commit- ted to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. Comment: Because of topography and existing trees on the subject property, this site can be suitably buffered from adjacent low density areas. The topogra- phy drops away from adjacent low density areas such that the visual impact of t multi-family development can be mitigated. The existing trees on the site offer an opportunity to provide further visual screening. By taking access to the site from the portion of the property closest to Pacific Highway, traffic noise impacts upon adjacent low density areas to the west can be minimized. (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. Comment: This site has direct access from Bull Mountain Road, a designated major collector street. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. Comment: The subject property is not located in a flood plain, area of high ' water table, or known geological hazard area. The subject property is located on a moderate slope which should pose no limitations to the safe development of this site. (5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for addidonal development. Comment: As indicated earlier in this report, all necessary public facilities are available in adequate capacity to service the proposed Medium-High Density Residential development on the property. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. Comment: Transit is available within 600 feet of the site at the intersection of Bull Mountain Road and Pacific Highway. The parking lot for the Christ the Mau King Lutheran Church at that intersection serves as a park and ride station. MOM (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. Comment: The property immediately to the east of this site is designated for office development. General Commercial development is located along Pacific Highway within one-quarter mile of this site. (8) Areas adjacent to eitherplivate orpublic permanent open space. Comment: There is no public or private open space in the immediate vicinity of this site. Open space can be provided on-site in developing the site plan for the future multi-family development. CONCLUSION The proposed Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change have been demonstrated to be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals and with the policies of the Tigard Compre- hensive Plan. All necessary public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed Medium-High Density designation. The proposed R-25 zoning will allow for greater energy conservation and will provide needed affordable housing. The specific locational criteria for the Medium-High Density designation list eight factors to be considered in siting this land use. The subject site complies with all of these factors except for immediate access to public or private open space. Needs for open space to service the future development can be provided on-site. Thus, this application meets with all pertinent criteria and approval is hereby requested. 1 ~~~Ijlg iNglijill Mimi jaw i I ~tt$CS CHURCH S. ESTAL STk110 A. srrs ' v ~ IUNGTON iSTPTES N ~►9 KING i• . auo• CITY EXISTING LAND USE ri I CD e e 1 I • so ° o I w 272.0 ~ P~/^ I ~Oa tD u V 136.05 Q' N 271.IU ° NTB°~1 E 50.24 188.28 2100 189.8 N 04° 21'E 3.37 AC. 1500 1600 1300 1400 n 69AC. o 1•17AC. ' 68AC. /7AC. o n - N89°48'E 188.40 94.24 ' lJ in 0 N ° O ~ N ,O it) SEE MAP • •1 2S I IOAC N W p = o ° a 01 0 U N = N N S 9-3049'W 168.8 144.49 140.00- N B9° S'17..t 1 U 2700 $ 28002900 co 3000 $ 5 0 1 1' S 89P 27' W 4 m _ 6 1,70' 400 ~l f a"• 7 \f 42.23 , Z 1'I4. 30~ X60 ) ~ 9. 70 1 < t7 b.27 -2600 m R 3100 8 - -p \ W b •IIVr 'lam o WASHINGTON ~y*t th `32009 $ „ ~.IJUl~ 2500 3300 94.00 ~oo`A AMENT TAXATION 0 2 11 go ON 10 ALL 41 ~ n S 09*40'IO•10 .yam ri 1 14409 A II ` Giis~ '66.^ofit$~riy7Vui~L 6yir}SF~i t`~7.'•a r.~ ~vlf jlk~ r I►l~~L l'(~ 18 n ® 3409 0 lip, 12 L) •'1 GippHq•`CP'~~r 4r ' iHC?10d X041 _ Ic.' _ W[!T 2Ya42 1..' r..a : C 7 cR pBan' . Qom' 44 1 .6 ',ti'. a')H..S•S.( :i 't. r, , Sim ~t.~,~.'(s , '1~,•.~•: tip. al ' ' ~'t ~ ;r 71 }T..• }r'i- ,/~,xx ~ ,1 j,~; , . • ► t'1~~;'' j) ' y. ~~1• .l; fI • :Y',~ i ,r ,S ~ ~ A! lr l .,f'~,w~ .a•~. ..F r.aw'/r :t i .f`.f• ;.~'!Z, I SIP ' - t •r• .i.. a _ i~' `...'o ~,~jy jet y• 1t. 1•ag,) ' 'x'.~ r .'r•:•~r•:*y;,' . A7. r r "T~ll: (.:t,1' 1~ i~9: yi:!il' :•l.l f'1.•.~~ t }f'1~' 1 •T~;~r''~' •l. `~•r~~.l. .Y I''k..,~ 1f•.. '1aCAOIg }'pUr `fid'WGII 11;13ft 93 ~'r ; , to ygc:ota :lrf i !Iier parcels, i whiie • r. :'tom . this b;itiw: d t 1 i Farrar! ' c; n • ► c: ocr Ong '4'6 ay fx aS ;n Ui aA'•a ,Y.';•~Y•`;Yt%: i . .•CH ' . • . i. - : • . 'S,.•~:' • I it l 3Urel!Yw:CL 'LSO " • • ~0 p P1 may, ~Gcnders~~~~ qa-oooa r~ Sam e BULL MOUNTAM ROAD NEAR MCFARLAND BOULEVARD L TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. REPORT 4~~31NE~q s/O i 8822 OREGON gUJ"Y30,19i6V. Robert ( Keech Associates, Inc. I Consulting Traffic Engineer 1225 NW Murray Blvd. Suite 206 Portland, OR 97229 i (503) 641-6333 i I I I BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR' IVIOFARLAN® BOULEVARD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT B February 20, 1992 L Table of Contents a Traffic Analysis Outline I Traffic Analysis Report Appendix A - Vicinity Map Appendix B - Site Traffic Generation Appendix C - Site Traffic Distribution Appendix D - Site Traffic Assignment Appendix E - Existing Traffic Flow Appendix F - Traffic Growth Appendix G - Intersection Analysis Appendix H - Site Layout i Ii I i f TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUTLINE ~ C_. Appendix E Determination of Determination of Survey of Proposed Surrounding Existing Traffic I Land use activity Land use patterns Flow I 7 w Appendix D Appendix C Estimation of Estimate of 1 Trip Generation Trip Distribution r------- ~--TAppendix G 1 Existing Traffic Appendix D ' Projection Site Traffic I 1 i Assignment i 0 f 1 Existing + i 6 Site Traffic t- ' S Appendbc F Projections ¢ Estimation of B Traffic Growth B Total Traffic 9 l j Intersection Analyes(-si i 1 --J F~® r KEECH ASSOCIATES,INC, CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD, SUIT 206, PORTLAND, ORE. (5031641-6333 L. i r. c BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR MCFARLAND BOULEVARD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT February 20, 1992 r I Introduction: This report examines a proposed zoning request that would allow for 7.73 acres of R-25 housing. The current zoning allows for 4.54 acres L of R-6 housing and 3.19 acres of professional office use. The site is located south of Bull Mountain Road near the intersection of McFarland Boulevard. Two driveways onto Bull Mountain Road are assumed. A ( detailed site plan has not been prepared. L Area of Analysis: This report investigates Bull Mountain Road from McFarland ( Boulevard to Pacific Highway. I Circulation Alternatives: Only direct access to Bull Mountain Road was reviewed. The site appears to have no other access alternatives available to it. f Keech Associates, Inc. BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR MCFARLAND BOULEVARD Page 2 i j Findings: i The existing traffic flow within the study area is summarized in 4 Table A. TABLE A EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW (1) F STREET AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Bull Mountain Road 531 Vehicles/Hour 632 Vehicles/Hour McFarland Boulevard 45 Vehicles/Hour 51 Vehicles/Hour Pacific Highway 2,397 Vehicles/Hour 2,712 Vehicles/Hour (1) ' Two-way traffic flow The trip generation for the proposed R-25 use of the site is estimated at about 1,260 trip ends per day (194 multi-family units). This can be compared to an estimated 1,831 trip ends per day under the existing use (28 single-family homes and 46,000 square feet of medical 1 office use). f s All the intersections within the area of analysis currently operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS), "D" or better. It is not anticipated that the addition of site traffic and a 10% increase in background traffic Keech Associates, Inc. 01 1 BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR MCFARLAND BOULEVARD Page 3 I_ will drop the LOS to unacceptable limits. The left turn traffic out of the 121 proposed site, the movement most subject to delay, would operate at a "C" LOS with a minimal 2 to 4 vehicles per hour. Bull Mountain Road at J Pacific Highway has a "B" LOS. The existing two west-to-north left turn lanes on the Bull Mountain Road approach moderate the impact of the site-generated traffic. W Either site use would generate sufficient left turn traffic into the site from Bull Mountain Road to warrant a left turn refuge. Conclusion: The traffic impact of the proposed zoning change would be less than that which would occur under existing zoning. Ample capacity is avai!able for either zoning. Consideration should be given to providing a left turn refuge on Bull Mountain Road. This should be reviewed in more detail during the design phase of this project. Robert Keech, P.E. Traffic Engineer P.E. #23371 ( L 1 Keech Associates, Inc. i ,I APP7n"NDIX A Vicinity Map I I L I MINOR _ w Nam am - - - ~-ram SW KATHERINE ST. \ `M fRS~~ 0 J co C.T.. _,IU~E i ~5~ d ~a..~ ~ ---N'~'. I - - {VWDA k q\ w 'H!U SW LYNN.' ST` SW NJ: ;o Y. rs eR t' ' 3 a PARK, PK SW 'ANN ST JR HS r• CLYtiESDALE PK J S 49r qq ~i a . CT ` ' S~ ! v) G SO $ " . NSW KAREN ST " 9 L I pL S~ cI0 d) ' C' 5 : c} ~~SW"BR )OK o A T S I' - o J OWN A! yys . I~ ` Ki BECC' CT in j ` BEHI r• 3 .yT ST CT' ~r~. 4S~ ~ SW 3N ~ I ^ ~i, °a : ti ~ r ~ 3 OY.:I 44 c1f 5~ JACKS ti~ . L SW WALNUT o pK N a S SW~ ¢ ERROL ST if ST f~ ~ SW MARIE 5W T[Q 1~ a' 1 c. x CT Q~ 3 ,`YMr %`3 y 5 Lit SW FERN " WALNUT sw 1D E SW > NcP qCN ST y (J 1 LN -j-_ CARMEN ST Sw \ F ~r~T s 11 < - `t 1 sr I SW a ALBERTA ST I Q i` ~v I L sv\ ti~ o :SW WATKINS pL -S ~ , S FDNNER ST .=`I \Q r V ~`;r,. a N o. h~ N . N tie` w F CT Cj W-D CT JAMES RD T a .S ':d `S Sr 'fy yf NSW MARION S PARK ' a O o / G r SW SW S ✓~i N ¢ ~l S xx x ° LOOK Lc) FAIRHAVENr"n SW FAI VE ST t f S G~1~C.. l~ z r EEhCHVT ti`v ~ ~ T Sw . } t ti~ FAIRY .H+ D SW Q La FATRHAV E 6b ROSE ST s SW GARDEN , ix VISTA 'SW ^ c 900( It 7": a SW YIEWPlOUNT CT PARK P SW HILLVIEW ST - - t - ST sr AMHOnr o~ < HILLVIEW _ 3 CEN v L Q' t. V, SW. ;5~ MCDONALD ' 4 T _ -`t t SW SW SW IF, T 000 5w ANTEt! :5W LROSEST cs SW ELRQSE CT C\j 91AIP1 t I Sw 2g. ? ,Q Q 'ice DUCHILLY 'GAL - - t -I r+ ¢ 1'~° 3 SW MOUNTAINVI_EW SW 12, SW MCFAALANp I'If SH GREENSI < 142 L N VIEW R~ TE N 42 s W t~ N SN CORYLCT SW WILOW `or v' ~~~G? SW INE ` °'ST 70 SSW INE ~~r ¢ t I' cli a 1 _ T R~ rR1RD0CK T MU LN pINEBt~OK2 PEMBR K Q 1 I BU L MO NT I N I EVANGLE K C C, SW 'CD J ~ o JR HS'°' Z I cEM S URDOC ST C\i 5~ o I ` °~W, } '~Ir EBE k s PjicrT 10000 I 1 i J 3 -SW SVI ~HEID Cf SC A cr I Q " g in iMARLYN ' t { 3 Qy` ~~,f t ;SW DEL MAN E DR IESLIEzCT Sti RFI[ $ ~ I ll CROD4RHL} SW HOOOVIEW S `'•'SATTLER ",.'a w 2 qG a 6~~r~~ S~ S R SW SlOTNIELD n p Q ,~Q V yAYyC ARLES ON Q, SW ' KABLE $T ~KESIDE . I d), LN II i H , PO N'can SU MERFIELD rn DR • o _ 9° ! ~``~c, D a ST GOL & COUNTRY.. $ S rr5 I; UN y S~ Sa s~ CLUB n+ec y<EY R < y a SW K LAND I '41 .1. 1 1 DR ar•- a I ~~~"Q~!- ~wri ~ ~ ~F.' S 1R11FR S' , - . C !4~ ' J V i i r i i i AP p EN D IX B Site Traffic Generation i t NIPPON i BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD NEAR MCFARLAND BOULEVARD TRAFFIC GENERATION (AS ZONED) i USE IN OUT TOTAL AM OFFICE 94 T/H 30 T/H 124 T/H RESIDENTIAL 5 T/H 16 T/H 21 T/H TOTAL 99 T/H 46 T/H 145 T/H PM OFFICE 56 T/H 130 T/H 186 T/H RESIDENTIAL 18 T/H 10 T/H 28 T/H TOTAL 74 T/H 140 T/H 214 T/H TRAFFIC GENERATION (AS PROPOSED) DISTRIBUTION TYPE IN OUT TOTAL AM RESIDENTIAL 17 T/H 83 T/H--T 100 T/H A z PM 17-RESIDENTIAL 82 T/H 40 T/H 122 T/H T/H = TRIPS PER HOUR i i i NEW i PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION g Worksheet i } SITE NAME: Bull Mountain Road Near McFarland Boulevard (As Zoned) SITE USE: Single Family (ITE Land Use Code 210) e; SITE SIZE: 28 Units (1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 9.55 trips/unit ESTIMATED TRANSIT USE: 0.0 ' ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 9.55 trips/unit TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 267.0 trips/day a PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 7.7 AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 21.0 trips/hour f AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.26 in/total g AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 5.0 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 16.0 trips/hour PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 10.6 PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 28.0 trips/hour PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.64 in/total r: PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 18.0 trips/hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 10.0 trips/hour i Source: 5th Edition "Trip Generation" (ITE, 1991) i (1) 4.54 acres; 6 units per acre i 3 j } PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet r SITE NAME: Bull Mountain Road Near McFarland Boulevard SITE USE: Professional Office (Medical) (As Zoned) SITE SIZE (A): 46,000 Square Feet(1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 34 t/KSF ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 00.0. ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE (B): 34 t/KSF PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK (C): 7.9% PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK (D): 11.9% TOTAL DAILY GENERATION (E)=A*B: 1564 trips per day AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION (F)=C*E: 124 trips/hour AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT (H): .77 trips in/total trips } AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN F*H: 94 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT F*(1-H): 30 trips/hour PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATION (G)=D*E: 186 trips/hour PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT (I): .30 trips in/total trips PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN G*I: 56 trips/hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT G*(1-I): 130 trips/hour 1 (1) 3.19 acres; 1/3 coverage ` KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991, Land Use Code 720 (Medical Office Building) i i I 1! F ~o.s ~mi~ n~?c iimnvmnmonn~r ~rrwmmrmnr,m,i~nr~om~ PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME Bull Mountain Road Near McFarland Boulevard (As Proposed) SITE USE: Apartments (ITE Land Use Code 220) SITE SIZE: 194 Units (1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit ESTIMATED TRANSIT USE: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 6.5 trips/unit TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 1261.0 trips/day PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING AM PEAK: 7.9 % AM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 100.0 trips/hour AM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.17 in/total AM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 17.0 trips/hour AM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 83.0 trips/hour PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DUPING PM PEAK: 9.7 % PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 122.0 trips/hour PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.68 in/total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 82.0 trips/hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 40.0 trips/hour Source: 5th Edition "Trip Generation" (ITE, 1991) (1) 7.73 Acres; 25 units per acre i _ T e. J r i i i t e 1 l L 1, x C APPENDI I 1. Site Traffic Distribution L 1 F APPENDIX C Site Traffic Distribution Y - Site traffic distribution for primary trips based on observation of existing traffic flows and general land use patterns. f1. K 1 t t ~ Nlvr o R°°d v ~ ~~Un~a1n e Cj) ryORTH W ~,lw r z Robert ZN~. M~~ arland ~Iv d KEECH A OR 9122915031 ~1'~333 p TtNG ~OA FAQ ~N~INEER i\Oa~ nECIr GONSUL Y BLVD, PORTIAND, dull Mountain 1225 NW IfURR~' '~ISTR'il~°rl e e r a a t e t 0 APPENDIX D e 0 Site Traffic Assignment e 6 4-7 4- 444 ~o 44-40 IF 4J 4,4 'IV ILI 4 r, ;Y, ci NORTH Z9 ~ d .SIT Robert 'iNC. ountain A~~OCRoad near McFoHand KttC9 N INE~R M ~I G TRAFFIC E ~u CONSULTIN OR 97229 (503( 641-6333 S , lvI~~c. 1225 NW MURRAY &V0., PORTLAND, 'I h c~ s u~ c ORTVI DST- lln artan G BRA 9,~2,~ i~o3i year ~o MtIRR~Y ~1.VD,, ~o tt I~o~nta~n ~u zRF~Z Assitia►M~~`''T Pecv ~,Urz I .~.rr ~-5 ~5 4~ab.~ ego Ln 'op gounlaM v '00d ~d- NORTH CMT- 3a SIT Robert I~JC, land blvd A~~OCIAT~~~ near MKtNH Nt,INEER Rood TING TRAFFIC E -6~ dull CONSUL ND OR 972291,503161 PORTLA S,T~ TR-.4rk~►~ss~ti~wr~~~► 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., , own r Ivill NMI ashes _ 4-20 1 4-22 444 f b ~.6~ 4J74 f a CID D lR®od ll.... ~Qu~ta1~ . U t ~ d- NaTH sIT Hobert INCe MCF06and KEECH ASSOCIATES N~INEER ~Ivd ba mou-1.6n CONSULT nload near ING TRAFFIC s 15051 Y ~I.VO. PORTLAPID, OR S~'~ TRAF~r+~ Ass i~,►~►~~''''} 1115 HW ~URRA ti All; ~r- wool, 44-- -a e7;4r 8z cc } 114, to 44 CL C~ 0kA j • \3 ° 2b~r ~~~er ZA°C~..~ y and ~ ~~~F ~2?915Q3~ C'~ ark L-rl AG IAN , OR ~aad ne 1225 o MUng X. kv ~ .v L O pU000 tIa No~tN (N-fig 6j OT bert Z~~, a ("A~Sd yN~IN~~ arlan ~ Z~G ~~A OR 9~2291~ Mc~ ~UL~ p4R~1.AND, ®a~, near ~Q 0 MAR l ~1.Vd i PtA Will line won s , `4 C X414 V) LL 0 V 0 Or `tj was= 5 w auC- SIT i\obert I~ nd ~~vd Kttc~ arla TR.AFFIG PO 503 616333 `n Road near OR 172,.91 OCT CONSULTING MQU~n~a N,,,,, 1225 NW M~IRRAY 6LV0,, RS~.AN4, ~R ~F ern s. sac- t 4 25 t- 4J 4-6 4J,-V#`F 14A -4r od OOU t4ORV LIP OOT- Robert C. INC~Ivd CH A~~ N~IN~~R c~ aria Rood i~ ~ ~-6333 near M TANG TR X5031 qln CONS~~ poRlt~Na► a~ s~ r r 0 r 0 .~raffi~ F,Ow 1 EXlsting e t e . 1 E i 4 •,y pp'PIE~p~~ $fec F!o 1992• '5 Exisging Tra as n'ea$urea ~anuarY ~Xistin9 traf{ic flow x ~t i; ;E 1 ' 9EIR t t s r_ ~t look, owl ~9 D d~ v d ,~,oa 19..- ~jpt~,nt~lt~ 4Tc 101 All OD -i~ 355- 41a r CIS NORTH SIT Roblart INC, d ~~CIACE land ~1v NCH A~ NG~INE~~ M~~a~ TRAFFIC ~ ~~.r6333 qin®ad ne CONSULTING pORTI.APiD, OR 97229 X503` WWI! baoun~ F r> 1115 NW HURRAY 61.VD., INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT S1204ARY REPORT BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY (99W) 906 1762 DAYEOFFWF~ Wedl/22/92 72 834 0 TIME STARTED: 06:45 s-108 L* 4-0 TIME ENDED: 08:45 330 p 40 N ( OR 0 a-0 1 H 95 4 i0 ( I fp, 425 36 1432 0 0 Peak Hour 929 07:05-08:05 Traffic Smithy x1468 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME FROM PERIOD TO b -s ? ~ 1 ~ ♦1 I ro. j 4- t ALL 06:45-06:50 6 0 15 2 61 0 2 98 0 0 0 0 184 06:50-06:55 10 0 13 3 50 0 2 113 0 0 0 0 191 06:55-07:00 7 0 23 6 58 0 1 89 0 0 0 0 184 07:00-07:05 9 0 22 .4 65 0 1 100 0 0 0 0 201 07:05-07:10 12 0 25 5 73 0 3 118 0 0 0 0 236 t 07:10-07:15 13 0 33 4 64 0 5 85 0 0 0 0 204 07:15-07:20 5 0 21 8 76 0 5 132 0 0 0 0 247 07:20-07:25 6 0 22 8 54 0 3 132 0 0 0 0 225 07:25-07:30 13 0• 35 5 59 0 3 126 0 0 0 0 241 07:30-07:35 5 0 33 6 70 0 2 116 0 0 0 0 232 07:35-07:40 4 0 23 6 74 0 1 139 0 0 0 0 247 07:40-07:45 6 0 35 9 75 0 2 125 0 0 0 0 252 07:45-07:50 6 0 23 4 88 0 4 127 0 0 0 0 252 07:50-07:55 5 0 27 4 58 0 3 146 0 0 0 0 243 4 07:55-08:00 11 0 33 8 78 0 3 81 0 0 0 0 214 08:00-08:05 9 0 20 5 65 0 2 105 0 0 0 0 206 08:05-08:10 5 0 20 12 49 0 5 84 0 0 0 0 175 08:10-08:15 4 0 34 8 54 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 178 08:15-08:20 6 0 22 3 65 0 4 106 0 0 0 0 206 08:20-08:25 8 0 22 10 83 0 6 108 0 0 0 0 237 08:25-08:30 5 0 31 13 72 0 3 81 0 0 0 0 205 08:30-08:35 3 0 22 13 63 0 6 84 0 0 0 0 191 i 08:35-08:40 3 0 19 9 59 0 7 99 0 0 0 0 196 08:40-08:45 6 0 29 22 68 0 5 84 0 0 0 0 214 l i Total Survey 167 0 602 177 1581 0 78 2556 0 0 0 0 PHF .79 0 .91 .86 .88 0 .69 .9 0 0 0 0 % Trucks 3 0 2 5.1 6.6 0 10.3 3.4 0 0 0 0 { Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 06:45-07:45 96 0 300 66 779 0 30 1373 0 0 0 0 2644 07:00-08:00 95 0 332 71 834 0 35 1427 0 0 0 0 2794 07:15-08:15 79 0 326 83 800 0 33 1391 0 0 0 0 2712 07:30-08:30 74 0 323 88 831 0 35 1296 0 0 0 0 2647 07:45-08:45 71 0 302 111 802 0 48 1183 0 0 0 0 2517 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT SW BULL, MOUNTAIN ROAD AT MCFARLAND BOULEVARD t32 DATE OF COUNT: 01/21/92 t13 DAY OF WEEK: Tue 4 0 28 TIME STARTED: 06:30 4-109 t 4-113 TIME ENDID : 08:30 A 5 ? 48 N OR 390 4-105 H 0 t 6l 395 418 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 08:20 Traffic Smithy t0 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND t TIME FROM PERIOD TO 4J 4- l ®l t ALL 06:30-06:35 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 16 06:35-06:40 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 18 06:40-06:45 0 18 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06:45-06:50 0 20 1 0 0 1 0 0 O 0 3 1 26 06:50-06:55 0 33 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 38 06:55-07:00 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 32 07:00-07:05 0 27 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 36 07:05-07:10 0 28 0 1 0, 2 0 0 0 0 7 1 39 07:10-07:15 0 28 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 38 07:15-07:20 0 24 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 30 07:20-07:25 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 2 30 07:25-07:30 0 33 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 6 2 48 07:30-07:35 0 36 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 44 07:35-07:40 0 36 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 45 07:40-07:45 0 33 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 39 RAN 07:45-07:50 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 39 07:50-07:55 0 38 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 11 1 54 07:55-08:00 0 45 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 58 08:00-08:05 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 49 08:05-08:10 0 30 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 0 41 08:10-08:15 0 22 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 10 1 39 08:15-08:20 0 33 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 15 2 54 08:20-08:25 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 1 29 08:25-08:30 0 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 0 48 Total Survey 0 664 6 6 0 46 0 0 0 0 177 11 PHF 0 .81 .42 .5 0 .7 0 0 0 0 .8 .5 Trucks 0 1.1 33.3 0 0 2.2 0 0 0 0 7.9 0 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 06:30-07:30 0 285 1 4 0 22 0 0 0 0 53 6 371 06:45-07:45 0 344 1 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 65 6 445 07:00-08:00 0 375 2 4 0 28 0 0 0 0 85 6 500 07:15-08:15 0 381 4 3 0 28 0 0 0 0 94 6 516 07:30-08:30 0 379 5 2 0 24 0 0 0 0 124 5 539 log 4-- 457 9-1 1-15 115 -0 ~ pfd ,~y►5 t- 4, G\ rLl\ t60 0;,o oa u-Y ~u 1v, U „ o X30 t4o?TN l b3'~ <4.L PA up FobeO ~N . K~ tc~ d lv C~ ar~ar~ TRA~~I ~s 1~a3164~-6333 NG near M ~~~~c~ NO oR 9~~ 1C1 Road CQN RRa~ b~vo., FOR~LA ► law -TV FI fir` ~sc►t~~, rtnRl i INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY (99W) AT BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD 1891 DATE OF COUNT: 01/22/92 348 1543 0 1222 TIME OF WEEK: STARTED: W116d :00 e--415 *j 1 ® *-0 TIME ENDED: 18:00 N 194 t0 O 0 4-0 H 74 101 t 268 0 - e67 1028 0 Peak Hour 1617 16:50-17:50 Traffic Smithy I 11095 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD FROM - TO *j I .41 t I~ t ALL 16:00-16:05 4 0 14 13 108 0 5 67 0 0 0 0 211 16:05-16:10 11 0 12 9 133 0 5 112 0 0 0 0 282 16:10-16:15 3 0 4 19 158 0 2 89 0 0 0 0 275 16:15-16:20 5 0 12 23 135 0 5 105 0 0 0 0 285 16:20-16:25 3 0 12 22 129 0 8 104 0 0 0 0 278 16:25-16:30 10 0 6 20 112 0 8 74 0 0 0 0 230 16:30-16:35 11 O 24 14 115 0 10 91 0 0 0 0 265 16:35-16:40 8 O 13 34 125 0 8 99 0 0 0 0 287 16:40-16:45 5 0 9 23 127 0 7 63 0 0 0 0 234 16:45-16:50 5 0 5 26 85 0 6 94 0 0 0 0 221 16:50-16:55 10 O 13 27 176 0 2 66 O 0 0 0 294 16:55-17:00 3 0 20 38 137 0 3 71 0 0 0 0 272 17:00-17:05 8 O 12 28 125 0 6 68 0 0 0 0 247 17:05-17:10 5 0 21 21 132 0 14 70 0 0 0 0 263 17:10-17:15 8 0 17 46 128 0 5 56 0 0 0 0 260 17:15-17:20 0 0 17 27 141 0 2 70 0 0 0 0 265 17:20-17:25 5 0 15 38 138 0 6 69 0 0 0 0 271 17:25-17:30 10 0 13 19 128 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 235 17:30-17:35 4 0 19 25 104 0 2 84 0 0 0 0 238 17:35-17:40 3 0 18 16 108 0 10 165 0 0 0 0 320 17:40-17:45 3 O 15 30 110 0 14 146 0 0 0 0 318 17:45-17:50 7 0 14 33 116 0 3 98 0 0 0 0 271 17:50-17:55 5 0 14 30 124 0 5 107 0 0 0 0 285 17:55-18:00 4 0 9 25 114 0 3 93 0 0 0 0 248 1 Ji Total Survey 148 0 328 606 3008 0 139 2126 0 0 0 0 PHF .8 0 88 .78 88 0 .62 63 0 0 0 0 % Trucks 2 0 2.1 .5 1.9 0 .7 2.5 0 0 O 0 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 78 0 144 268 1540 0 69 1035 0 0 0 0 3134 16:15-17:15 81 0 164 322 1526 0 82 961 0 0 0 0 3136 16:30-17:30 86 0 179 341 1557 0 69 882 0 0 0 0 3114 16:45-17:45 72 0 185 341 1512 0 70 1024 0 0 0 0 3204 17:00-18:00 70 0 184 338 1468 0 70 1091 0 0 0 0 3221 I N 11 I INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT I SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT MCFARLAND BOULEVARD ~18 DATE OF COUNT: 01/21/92 t33 DAY OF WWM• Tue 2 0 16 TIME STARTED: 16:00 4-430 41 L* *-457 TIME ENDED: 18:00 I A 4 ? i 429 N { O 159 - r ®-428 H 0 i► 163 -a t r 175 1 0 0 0 Pea}7c;00u1 0 l 8:00 Traffic Smithy to Traffic Survey Service r, TIME EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND 4 1 FROM PERIOD TO Lr r~ a-- ALL 16:00-16:05 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 53 16:05-16:10 0 18 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 29 3 55 16:10-16:15 0 13 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 23 1 40 16:15-16:20 0 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 29 3 44 16:20-16:25 0 15 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 19 1 41 16:25-16:30 0 12 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 35 16:30-16:35 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 27 3 43 16:35-16:40 0 16 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 25 2 46 16:40-16:45 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 3 35 16:45-16:50 0 17 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 27 3 49 16:50-16:55 0 18 1 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 33 1 59 16:55-17:00 0 9 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 29 3 43 17:00-17:05 0 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 45 1 66 17:05-17:10 0 8 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 37 0 48 17:10-17:15 0 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 31 6 56 17:15-17:20 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 5 56 17:20-17:25 0 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 35 1 50 ( 17:25-17:30 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 35 2 49 L 17:30-17:35 0 20 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 31 3 57 17:35-17:40 0 20 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 29, ' 2 55 17:40-17:45 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 1 44 17:45-17:50 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 42 0 49 t 17:50-17:55 0 15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 40 2 59 l 17:55-18:00 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 33 6 49 t_ I Total Survey 0 333 8 6 0 39 0 0 0 0 740 55 PHF 0 .78 .5 .5 0 .57 0 0 0 0 .93 .6 r g Trucks 0 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .9 0 l1 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 0 174 4 4 0 23 0 0 0 0 312 26 543 16:15-17:15 0 164 3 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 345 28 565 ( 16:30-17:30 0 161 4 3 0 16 0 0 0 0 386 30 600 16:45-17:45 0 174 6 3 0 19 0 0 0 0 402 28 632 17:00-18:00 0 159 4 2 0 16 0 0 0 0 428 29 638 MEMO= r it i APPENDIX F ~ Traffic Growth L r I I own APPENDIX F Traffic Growth !~D i .J The traffic growth was assumed to be a 10% increase in existing traffic on Pacific Highway and Bull Mountain Road. This increase is used to provide _ a level of service comparison for the immediate future. f._ ~a L P i f 1 E i. r- ' LAD a LID ~ Cn NOR~K 6 4- 444 3° W s SIT 10 Fobert ~ttc~ A5 NINE -6333 c~ arland ~ TRA~~ 97229 ~503~ 5~1 n~a~ M QNS~~-TIN , pQRTI.ANQ, OR M11RRA'~1.V0, a~n Road G 11150 u~l Mount el ~a ~~Y4NL At_ ~ *-y5 ~q 44'4 4-45 x.64 i~ -4 -C R CI) NORTH gobeT-fi land K~~~ T~A~~IC g 543 641-633 ~a~ Mc ar NS~~TJNG OR~I.AHD, OR 97 2 I ~n load n" 24 Nw Ong, wo., ulloun~a ~1i L>t f11~ t~•r~ c 1 ~L P1V"1 L ~ x - I C t I I I ~ I 1 I. i I. AP-PE NDI - X G I ~ Intersection Analysis 1 r I I igg i a APPENDIX G Intersection Analysis 1 Traffic Projections: 't Estimated Existing - Estimated existing traffic flow from field measurements t conducted January, 1992. s Existing + Site (As Zoned) - Existing traffic plus site traffic as if site were built out as zoned (78 single family units; 45,000 square foot medical office). Existing + Site (As Proposed) - Existing traffic plus site traffic as if site were built out as proposed (194 multi-family units). f Total Traffic (As Zoned) - Existing and site (as zoned) plus traffic growth. Total Traffic (As Proposed) - Existing and site ( as proposed) plus traffic i , growth. l i I- 1 s ~ s SUMMARY OF P CAPACITY ANALYSIS rr BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD AT MCFARLAND BOULEVARD 1_. Intersection Existing Existing Total + Site Traffic LOS LOS LOS I Z/P Z/P Bull Mountain Road at McFarland Boulevard (stop sign control) (1) I AM Peak Hour B BIB B/B FPM Peak Hour B C/C C/C Bull Mountain Road at West Access (stop sign control) (1) AM Peak Hour B/B B/B PM Peak Hour C/C C/C Bull Mountain Road at East Access (stop sign control) (1) AM Peak Hour C/C C/C PM Peak Hour C/C C/C Bull Mountain Road at Pacific Highway (stop sign control) (1) _ AM Peak Hour B B/B B/13 PM Peak Hour B B/B B/B LOS = Level of Service (See Level of Service Criteria) I Z = Site As Zoned P Site As Proposed (1) The level of service, for stop sign controlled intersections, is calculated for each stop or yielding I movement. Generally, the side street left turn movement has the poorest LOS as illustrated in the Summary of Capacity Analysis. This LOS may be experiencsd by only a few vehicles (those making the left turn), whereas the average LOS of all vehicles entering the intersection would be much better. I v LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR NSIGNLIZED INTERSECTIONS Reserve Capacity(l) LOS Expected Delay to All,nor vehicles/hour Street Traffic >400 A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0-99 E Very long traffic delays F (11 Reserve Capacity = Adjusted Capacity - Demand LOS = Level of Service `When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic'movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Source: "Highway Capacity Manual"; Special Report 209; Transportation Research Board (1985). LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Level of service A Describes operations with very low delay, i.e., less than 5.0 sec per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Level of service S Describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 sec per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Level of service C Describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cvcle failures may tagin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass throught the intersection without stopping. -tevel of service D Describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 sec per vehicle. At level HIM D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping-declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level of service E Descibes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Level of Service F Describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered 10 to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Source: "Highway Capacity Manual"; Special Report 209; Transportation Research Board 0 985). cj l o5 *j 41- `4 4--l F-11 --4- liv- 390 Existing Site (as zoned) g 4J - ~ ,qW 4-i? F* 4°5 E+S(As Zoned) 4j 6 4-l~F' Site (proposed) 393 E+S(Proposed) Y 4j 5 -1' Flo *j 445 - + -j- 1 Z? 404 TT(As-Zoned) 4F S F® i Traffic Growth 433 E+S=Existing+Site TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd R o b e rt g%3 LL fAour%4,,;a'gono AT N1cFAr(Gnd Ewa KEECH ASSOCIATES INC, CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER Pia Y- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 a UNSIGNALIIED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WOFik::SHEE- BulI Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd D McFarland Date of Count: E:>; i s•L- i nu Dav of Week.: Weekday Tirn(-:a of Day: AM Hour • P'revailino Speed: 45 i :•:s • • "t B #F of tales on major street: 2 4 APPROACH GRADES: I :;:;:.....,,,.,....,,,.:;:;;;::s;>c>;:a>;>;X A r~% - B (a"4:D C/. Bull Mtn SHAPED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH A C: ; . . . < B MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT EIR r L. VOLUMES 5 390 C? 'S o 4• i ~ r) o 0 105 e PCH 6 1 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5EsR-1,BT= 1119 CAP(-iC I TY B96 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMP'EDANCE' ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAP(-,,CITY 886 °1-- CAPACITY USED= .45% IMPEDANCE CREATED= I DEMAND (LOS:=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR+D T = 1.13 CAPACITY 1 oe4 CRITICAL GAF- 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY l o94 CAPACITY USED= .55% IMPEDANCE CREATED= I DEMAND (LOS=•A? 6 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) ~ CONFLICTING FLOW . SLrR+I'; +L~L+AL..~ AT+AR ! CT? CR= 504 CAPACITY 370 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE AD,:ILJST•MEI\!-r=: I. ADJUSTED CAPACITY 37f3 CAPACITY USED= e.27. IMPEDANCE CREATED= .94 DEMAND (LOS=B) 31 f I . LOS = Level ot• Service (11!89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conf1ictina voluume equals0.75 of PCH 11 111 111111111@11! t. ff UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORk::SHEET Bul I Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd / D < McFarland Date of Count: 1:7' -S(Zoned) i Dav of Week:.: Weekda;• Time of Day: AM I'Exak:: Hour .,,....,,;::xPrevailing Speed: 45 D # of lanes- on major- street: (a APPROACH GRADES: Ema , >1 , x N. 11 LME $LA11 Mtn SHARED LANES: z0a APPROACH D: none APPROACH I) • ; > Es MOVEMENT AL_ AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL j LET BR VOLUMES 5 405 i i 28 c_i 4 0 1 G c i 112 0 PCH 6 31 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5E'R+E;T= I. i. 6 CAPACITY 879 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= I ADJUSTED CAPACITY e79 CAPACITY USED= .46% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT- TURNS FROM A (AL) L CONFLICTING FLOW HR•+•DT= 120 CAPAC I TY 10 7 6 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE:: ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY o'76 CAPACITY USED= .56% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 6 LEFT TURNS FROM I) (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5E;R•'-E;T-i-EsL+AL.•i-AT -t-EtR•+.CT+CR=• 526 CAPACITY 367 CRITICAL- GAP= 7. 5SEC . IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 367 CAPACITY USED= 8.45% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .94 DEMAND (LOS=:L') 3J. I. . LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting v01UUme equals0.75 of PCH UNS I GNAL I "LED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORE:::SHEET ~ Bull Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd Date of Count: E+S (Proposed) D McFarland Day of Week: Weekday ` l-i me of Dav: AM Peal:: Hour" r.:,,..;>;.,.,:;;;;; Prevai 1 ing Speed: 45 B #k of lanes on major- street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: Bull. Mtn SHARED LANES: 5 APPROACH D: none 4 , . . A{: . . . >D<<. . . : •C; . . . . > >B< . APPROACH X..':- > MOVEMENT AL AT Al=t 4 DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 5 393 0 28 0 4 0 0 0 0 117 8 z PCH 6 .31 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) 7 CONFLICTING FLOW . 5BR-FBT= I"! CAPACITY 874 CRITICAL GAPS= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 874 CAPACITY USED .46% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 k LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR+BT=; 125 CAPACITY 107r CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1 070 CAPACITY USED= .56% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=e"-i) 6 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5BR-FL T.•+BL•1-AL•4•AT-FAR+CT+CR= 519 CAPACITY 371 CRITICAL_ GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTED CAPACITY x:71 CAPACITY USED= 8.36% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .94 DEMAND (LOS=D) 3i LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals().75 of PCH 1 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORF- "SHEET' E!s(l l Mn~ (ni ai n Road at McFarl,ziind Blvd D McFarland Dat(_ of Count: TT(Lc~ned) Dav o•f Week. Week:dav r Time of Dzw. AM Pea.k: Hour Prevai1ing Speed: 45 R }f of lanes on major street.: A APPROACH GRADES: x>:x:.>(>(>:>::,..,..,., A C)%-B 0%-D G% Bull 111tn SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none ! } A PPRO A CH ">>>>>A-:' ; : • : r >D C ::>L(<:; MOVEMENT AL AT AF DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT DR VOLUMES 5 445 0 28 0 4 0 0 0 U 122 g PCH 6 1 4 i RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) L CONFLICTING FLOW . 5BR4-BT= 126 CAPACITY 069 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= I ADJUSTED CAPACITY 869 CAPACITY USED= .46% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR-4-BT= 130 CAPACITY 1 064 L CRITICAL GAR= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUS-!-ED CAPACITY 10.ZL CAPACITY USED= .56% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 6 LEFT' TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+BT+BL-1-AL•i-AT•i-AR+C`F-+-CF:=- 576 CAPACITY =.42 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== 1. ADJUSTED CAPACITY 342 CAPACITY USED= 9.060001% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .94 DEMAND (!.-O S=B) ;1 L • l LOS Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting vol uume equal s0. 75 of PCH UNS I GNAL T Z ED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORI•::SHEE"I" Bul 1 Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd D x McFarland Date of Count: TT (Proposed) Day of Week:: Weekday l-i me . of Day: AM Peak: Hour X.1-1 x X X, >1 X, >;X x ;XXX :::;Prevai l i na Speed: 45 B (:k of lanes an major street. 2 ` A APPROACH GRADES: A C)%: B 0%.-D o% Bul1 Mtn SHARED LANES: _ APPROACH D: none APPROACH MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL 13T DR VOLUMES 5 433 0 28 0 4 Q 0 0 0 127 8 PCH 6 :7.1 4 c RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+BT= 131 CAPACITY 864 CRITICAL GAP--- 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED C..",i•iPAC I TY 864 CAPACITY USED= .46% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=r'i) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFL I CT I IVG FLOW BR•+L~T= 1:35 CAPAC I TY 1 Q 5 G l_ CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1050 CAPACITY USED= .577 IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 6 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR-i-B?"+BL-H•AL-+-AT•+-AR••E-CT-~-CR= 569 CAPACITY •=46 CRITICAL. GAP= 7. 5SEC . IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 346 CAPACITY USED= 8.96% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .94 DEMAND (LOS=-B) 1 mw_ I I i j f i L • ' I LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting VDIULlme equals0.75 of PCH ~t 9 4-42,5 14141 4 lqv 4`i2 4 4J"~4,V~;7 Ise, Existin Site (as zoned) ~Z5 N 4-- 4r,0 *j 41 4 1 L+ 4 41 t r+ 14~ It F* -r 2q I Z. E+S(As Zoned) 4J4-4 -,qW7 Site (proposed) 1 -7I E+S(Proposed) 4-4S L4 ? 7 I`68 t- ZI *1 4-471 I TT(As-Zoned) *J4-4 -qV L+ ~~r® I Traffic Growth 1894 E+S=Exiating+Sit9 TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd R o b e rt KEECH ASSOCIATES4 INC, PM Req it- 15 NW MURRAY CONSULTING VD PORTLAND ORR 97229 1503) 64 63 3 UNSIGNAL-ILED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORk::SHEET" q Bul 1. Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd D „ McFarland Date of Count: Existing Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak: Hour- ;;:XX ,:>;>;>;INX >;1 "..,X>: Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major- street: 2 . , X 11, . APPROACH GRADES: . BulI Mtn SHARED LADIES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH 'I A : • > • D•-; <; MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BF; VOLUMES 4 159 0 16 0 4 0 0 0 0 428 29 PCH 4 18 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5BR+BT= 442.5 CAPACITY 590 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT* = 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 59C1 CAPACITY USED= .6e% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) ' CONFLICTING FLOW BR+BT= 457 CAPACITY 744 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT- 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY '44 CAPACITY USED= .54% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND ( LOS= A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) y CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+BT+•BL.-i-AL_-i-AI-+AR-+•CT+CR= 605.5 CAPACITY .';27 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= I ADJUSTED CAPACITY "3:27 CAPACITY USED= 5.5% IMPEDANCE CHEATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=B) l._ t- LOS = Level of Service (11159) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting vol UUMF-' equal sO. 75 of PCH UNSIGNALIZF_D INTERSECTION CAPACITY WOF:k::SHEET Bull Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd C.. D x McFarland Date of Count- E-1-S(Zoned) Day of Week:: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak: Hour- X 1.11 IN :;x ;:x;;x Prevailing Speed: 45 11 V B #k of lanes on major street-. 2 A APPROACH GRADES: Bull Mtn SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none AP='P'ROACH . A•;:_:< •::<--I> :>D....:;..:; :<::<..", X : C s:<;<:< >9 MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR LPL BT BR VOLUMES 4 170 0 16 0 4 0 0 0 U 450 ( F'CH 4 iS 4 t_ RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+B7= 464.5 CAPACITY 575 CRITICAL GAF- 68EC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJ(JSTED CAPACITY 575 CAPACITY USED= .7% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=:A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR+BT= 479 CAPACITY 724 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTF-::t) CAPACITY 724 CAPACITY USED= .55% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DE:-NAND (L..015;-A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5BR+BT-t•BL+AL+PiT+AR+CT-FCF-r=• 67.8. CAPAC I 'T Y U9 CRITICAL GAP= 7. 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMEN'T-z 1 ADJUSTED CAPo('.,1 TY CAPACITY USED= 5.B3% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DUMAND (l-05=C) 1B I i LOS = Level of Service (11/89) L On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH UNSIGNAL_IZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd •r. D - McFarland Date of Count: F_+S(Proposed) Day of Week: Week.day Time r)f Dav: PM Peak: Hour x:..;x;;;;;;;,,,Prevailing Speed: 45 >1 >1 X, 1.11 X >1 B $1 of l ane5 on major street: 2 A AP'P'ROACH GRADES: Bull. Mtn SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none ......:>A<:: <; D C •c: ; <; < > ;>B< APPROACH MOVEMENT AL' AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR !BL BT BR VOLUMES 4 171 0 16 U 4 U i) 0 0 434 29 PCH 4 1.8 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .SBR+BT= 448.5 CAPACITY 586 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 586 CAPACITY USED= .68% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1. DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR+BT= 46 CAPACITY 738 CRITICAL GAP= SSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUS"rMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAP=ACITY 73e CAPACITY USED= .547. IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW .SBR+E'T+BL+AL+AT-FAR•+-CT•FCR= 62_x.5 CAPACITY '1.7 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 317 CAPACITY USED= 5.68% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=C) ie 1 LOS = Level of Service (11189) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting vuluume equals0.75 of F'CH ~Y UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORT SHEET Bull Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd D McFarland Date of Count: TT(Zoned) x Da- of Week:: Week:day, Time, o s Dav c P-M Peak Hour :<;;xxX,:..:XX1XI.. .,.,,..:>:?txX11 Prevailing Speed: 45 B #k of lanes on major street: A APPROACH GRADES: :c :..............c>c>c?,..; xX>1XX,xI'll ;ax;:;:x:.,. A o%:B c.%-D 0% Bull Mtn SHARED LANES: ( APPROACH D: none APPROACH r A D.;; ; C. <; : : : B : MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT 13R VOLUMES 4 188 0 16 i--? 4 0 0 G 495 29 PCH 4 18 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+BT= 509.5 CAPACITY 54` CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT- 1 ADJUSTE:P. CAPACITY 54 CAPACITY USED= .74% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR+BT= 524 CAPACITY 607 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 687 CAPACITY USED= .58% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS-A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+BT•4-BL+AL-+-AT+AR-i-CT+CR= 701.5 CAPACITY 274 CRITICAL GAF= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 274 CAPACITY USED= 6.57% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .95 DEMAND (LOS=C) 18 Si l LOS = Level of Service (11/69) On major streets with 4 lanes. conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH 1 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mountain Road at McFarland Blvd i i x D x McFarland Date of Count: T' f (f='r goosed ) x Day of Wee[..-.: Wee[.--.day X X Time of Day.- PM Peak: Hour s >;......>,..:;>;XX11.;:< Pr evai 1 my Speed: 45 9 # of lanes vii ina-i ur° str•eec c A APPROACH GRADES: V >1 >1 <1.11 A (.)%.-B 0%:D 0% Bul1 Mtn SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none s APPROACH < << >B•:<. MOVEMENT ALM1 AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 4 169 0 16 0 4 0 0 c1 0 479 29 PCH 4 18 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+9T= 493.5 CAPACITY 555 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 555 CAPACITY USED= .72% IMPEDANCE: CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR+•BT= 508 CAPACITY 699 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= ADJUSTED CAPACITY 699 CAPACITY USED= .57% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM D (DL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5BR-FEIT+•BL•+•AL•+•AT+AR-i-CT+CR= 6B6..5 CAPACITY 282 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 282 CAPACITY USED= 6.38% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=C) 1G i 4 i LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH Alt- i3 41 L* 4-- s A16, _ Existin Site (as zoned) t- x---11 4--4 *j L+ "i;- *j L* '.~7 4 4~ 00 • i -r Z E+S(As Zoned) 4;- 4 Si o os®d ~t~ t e (p r p ) 43 co LA E+S(Proposed) 4,tFl~ 4D TT(A3-Zoned) 4~L* 4 *It F* ~ Traff is Growth 4 3 4 ;j E+S=Existing+Sit® TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd Robert e.T AtceS, KEECH ASSOCIATES INC, CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER Any P~~ 4va- 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 97229 15031 641-6333 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORI:SHEET Bull Mountain Road at West Access Date of Count: E-FS(Zoned) Dav of Week t Weekday Time of Day: AM Peak Hour v...... x 11 V..>. 1.1...1.1 X. x X.,.X•,• X Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 2 a _ APPROACH GRADES: 4 •x• xXle.x A o%: B 0%.-C 0% Bull Mtri x SHARED LANES: x ;c APPROACH C: none C West Access APPROACH :>D : >C--'.-'.' . . . , :>B< <; . . MOVEMENT ALY AT AR UL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR C> VOLUMES 0 432 1 0 0 0 2 0 131 4 118 PCH 2 14 4 ..R ) RIGHT TURNS FROM C (r CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 432.5 CAPACITY 597 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 597 CAPACITY USED= 2.351: IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND (LDS=A) 14 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 433 CAPACITY 765 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 765 CAPACITY USED= .52% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1. DEMAND (LOS=:A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) ` CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+A-i-•+AL+BL+BT-+-BR•+•DT+DR= 554.5 CAPACITY 353 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 35: CAPACITY USED= .57% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=B) 2 EMER IPA= [gum LOS = Level of Service (11!69) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH i UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORt;:SHEET Bull Mountain Road at West Access i i Date of Count: E+S(Proposed) Day of Week: Weekday i Time of Day: AM Peak. Hour :;::x:;xXX11•;:;X Xxx:•:::xxxxI.IXx Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: A APPROACH GRADES: ::XxX,:;:;>::<xx:; Xx>c>1xxxx A 0%: B i)%: C 0% i Bull Mtn X „ SHARED LANES: i x „ APPROACH C: none C x West Access .4 # : `:>D .::!<':<':<::-.. ;-C.:;.:::<;•:::<:<::':::: , . ; `B<:t::<:: APPROACH r A ; MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES ci 419 4 0 0 0 e 0 21 4 117 0 i PCH 9 3 4 i RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .SAR-FAT= 421 CAPACITY 6~5 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT=S 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 6o5 CAPACITY USED= 3.8% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 23 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 423 CAPACITY 774 { CRITICAL GAP= SSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 774 CAPACITY USED= .52% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . SAR-FAT+AL+BL-FL-;T+BR•+-DT-i-DR= 542 CAPACITY :359 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 59 CAPACITY USED= 2.51% IMPEDANCE CHEATED= .98 DEMAND (LOS=B) 9 i i I I LOS = Level of Service (11/69) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH Nil UNSIGNAL_IZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull. Mountain Road at West Access Date of Count: TT(Zoned) am= OEM Day of Week:: Weekday Time. of Day: AM Weak: Hour ;;;,xxxx:;xPrevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A,, APPROACH GRADES: , j Bull Mtn „ SHARED LANES: APPROACH C: none „ C „ West Access j i APPROACH ..>::.:>R=:<:::<'.=:<:<:::.:.. >D?:::<:<:<:::::. >.:::.C.:::.::::;;..::.:.:::::> ;>;.;..f;.B<::<• MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL L DT DR rCL CT CR BL HT BR VOLUMES 0 472 1 0 0 0 2 0 13 4 128 it i PCH 2 14 4 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 472.5 CAPACITY 569 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 569 CAPACITY USED= 2.46% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND (LOS=A" 14 LEFT TURNS FROM Es (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 47 CAPACITY 729 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC.. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 729 CAPACITY USED= .55% IMPEDANCE CREATED= i DEMAND (LOS-A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR+AT+AL+BL•+•BT+L-sR+DT•+DR= 6(--)4.5 CAPACITY 328 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTEI? CAPACITY ::,2G CAPACITY USED= .61% IMPEDANCE CREATED= i DEMAND (LOS=E0 2 r f t_ LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH i MEN= I loll 111 1 us= UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WOR„S!-EET Null Mountain Road at West Access Date of Count: TT(Proposed) Day of Week- Week--.day Time of Day: AM Peak: Hour X:::;::x;<x: Xl X, >;xx>;>;xxxxX1%,>; Prevailing Speed: 4.5 B # of lanes on major street: 2 If- A APPROACH GRADES: :;x>.,.::: xX111>11x>; >;x:;I'll xx:;>;x>;I'll A 0%: B C)%: C ci% Bull Mtn V SHARED LANES: X APPROACH C: none C x West Access APPROACH •A<;<r<:~::."<<•. l >D< <r . >C--'-:,* < >B<<<:: MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 459 4 0 0 0 8 O 21 4 128 0 PCH 9 23 4 L RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) L CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 461 CAPACITY 577 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 577 CAPACITY USED= 3.99`/. IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 23 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR•f-AT= 463 CAPACITY 738 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 738 CAPACITY USED= .54% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=A) 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR-rAT+AL+BL-i-BT+BR+DT•i-DR= 593 CAPACITY 334 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 334 CAPACITY USED= 2.69% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND (LOS=B) 9 t_ LOS = Level of Service (11%89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH i t 4-457 4-e 4~tF* Existing Site (as zoned) 4-41-1 2- ~~4 v 5 4~F 4-I L4 4-4$9 E+S(As .honed) *J-4.4 V z~ 4-1?r® Site (proposed) 1e, - s~z E+S(Proposed) *J4-4qV -t I 4-L' 5 *1 It FBI 4- TT(As-Zoned) 4J-4-4,qV'Ls Traff is Growth 3 E+S=E!xi.stincq+Sit® TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd Robert r WEST «~SS KEECH ASSOCIATES INC. PfA CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER +IL 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 91229 15031641- Rill UNS I GNAL I ZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORk::SHEET Bull Mountain Road at West Access Date of Count: E+S(Zoned) Dav of Week:: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak: Hour- ;<XX >:x• X XXXVx•:;•:Vxx 1 x x Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: x;:>:xxxxx>t>sx>t ,XXx:;xxx>1xxx A 0%:B 0%.-C 0% Bull Mtn X SHARED LANES: X x APPROACH C: none >c C x West. Access APPROACH >>>D4<<<<<< , C•'•:: <<;G >>B;t= < <<::<:: MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 183 3 0 C) 0 2 0 8 16 477 0 PCH 2 9 18 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) L CONFLICTING FLOW .SAR+AT= 184.5 CAPACITY 811 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 811 CAPACITY USED= 1.11% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 9 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 166 CAPACITY 997 CRITICAL GAP= SSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 997 CAPACITY USED= 1.81% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 18 IBM LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) r CONFLICTING FLOW .SAR+AT+AL+BLI-BT+BR+DT+DR= 677.5 CAPACITY 287 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .99 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 284 CAPACITY USED= .7% IMPEDANCE CREATED= 1 DEMAND (LOS=C) 2 M t . LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Hull Mountain Road at West Access Date of Count: E+8(Proposed) Day of Weed:: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak: Hour >:xx>:;.::>:>:;:;cx>: ;r;~;~>:;: Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 2 Y A APPROACH GRADES: ,xxXxXXxxxxx •,xx>:>:r.x>:>;>;>; A 0%-9 C+%:C Hull Mtn SHARED LANES: >t APPROACH C: none x C West Access APPROACH MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL HT BR VOLUMES 0 167 11 0 0 0 4 0 11 25 459 C+ PCH 4 12 28 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 192.5 CAPACITY BC+3 CRITICAL GAP= GSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 80, CAPACITY USED= 1.49% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 12 LEFT TURNS FROM B (HL) C CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 198 CAPACITY 982 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 982 CAPACITY USED= 2.85% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND (LOS=A) 28 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT+AL+BL-+BT+BR+DT+DR= 676.5 CAPACITY 2BB CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .98 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 282 CAPACITY USED= 1.42% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C) 4 C t 7 ![{S i l + I 4 r I LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mountain Road at West Access Date of Count: TT (Zoned) Day of Week: Weekday Time ' of Day: PM Peak: Hour AX>:x;•.,..: xx ;:>:XXM.x Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: „ Bull Mtn X SHARED LANES: X APPROACH C: none C x West Access AF'F'ROACI-I ;>r A<:<:<::=:: D<::<::<::<::::<:: >:>B'.<:<' MOVEMENT AL_ AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 201 U c_; 0 2 U 8 16 522 c.) PCH 2 9 18 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 202.5 CAPACITY 793 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 793 CAPACITY USED= 1.13% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 9 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 2C>4 CAPACITY 976 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 976 CAPACITY USED= 1.84% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 18 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR+AT.*AL+BL+BT•+•BR-FDT+DR= 740.5 CAPACITY 261 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .99 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 258 CAPACITY USED= .78% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C) 2 t. I I. r. LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH a i UNS I GNAL 17-ED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WOFiICSHEE"1" Bull Mountain Road at West Access Date o•f Count: TT (Proposed) Day of Week: Weekday Time of Dav: FM Peal.:. Hour :::...:::...:x::;::::,.,. x Prevailing Speed: 45 9 # of 1 antis on ma j or street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: :;::...:XXX A 0%: B Q%: C (')i: BL111 Mtn SHARED LANES: X APPROACH C. none C „ blest Access APPROACH t: : r' MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL 8T BR VOLUMES 0 219 11 0 0 c-) 4 0 11 25 504 0 PCH 4 12 2E3 ? RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR ) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 224, CAPACITY 774 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT=- 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 774 CAPACITY USED= 1.55% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=P,) 12 LEFT TURNS FROM 9 (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR•+AT= 230 CAPACITY 950 CRITICAL GAF'- 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT- 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 950 CAPACITY USED= 2.95% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND ( LOS=Pt) 28 LEFT TURNS-FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR+AT•i-AL+E;L-+-E{T•i-EsR•+•=)T•+DR 753.5 CAPACITY 256 10 i CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .99 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 251 CAPACITY USED= 1.597. IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C:) 4 LOS = Level of Service (11!89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH ill I X41 X80 *]F+ Existln Site (as zoned) 1►'1 4-y *j 's~ 4J 4- 4 ►n 4~ -t r► 434 At- 4-11-7 E+S(As Zoned) 4j4-i+,qV90 Site (proposed) 439 14Vgo E+S(Proposed) +-►o 4~ t Fl~ 4J 4- 4 qW V) *11t r+ 4- 1 ZI i° TT(As-Zoned) ~0" Traff is Growth 4ti~ kn EfS=Exiting+~ite TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd Robert M T ~ u-ess KEECH ASSOCIATES INC. IBM CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER P~''~ 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 91229 15031 641-6333 r ~ i UNS I GNAL 17-ED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET BUl I Mountain Road at. F 4 ,t Access Date of Count: E+S (7-oned ) . Dav of Week.: Weekday Time of Dav: AM Peak Hour :x:::•:xXXX,::::::>:xxx>::::: Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes. on major street: 2 [t A APPROACH GRADES: BulI Mtn SHAFTED LANES: APPROACH C: none f . C x Ean-t Aacests APPROACH A< <<;= >Dz:> C< <::....,'-Es <; MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 431 14 C) 0 5 0 25 80 117 0 PCH 6 28 9E9 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR-i-AT= A.39 CAPACITY 593 CRITICAL GAF':= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUST"MENT"= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 593 CAPACITY USED= 4.72% IMPEDANCE CHEATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 2E3 LEFT- TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 445 CAPACITY 755 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 755 CAPACITY USED= 11.667 IMPEDANCE CREATED= .92: DEMAND (LOS-=A) so LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR+AT•i-AL•+-EiL-z-BT-i-BR+DT+DR= 63,5 CAPACITY 311 CRITICAL GAF= 7. 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .92 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 286 CAPACITY USED= 2.1% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C) 6 I_ LOS Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH i IS ''I F UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORF:::SHEET Bull Mountain Road at East Access Date of Count: E-1-S (Propnhed) Day of Week:: Weekday Time of Day: AM Peak Hour Prevailing Speed: 45 B of lanes on major street: 2 ~ IN . AP11 . x APPROACH OACH GRADES: A 0%: B C)%: C 0% Hull Mtn SHARED LANES: APPROACH C: none C East Access APPROACH , . . . 'A,, < MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CI_ CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 439 1 0 0 0 4 0 50 90 117 0 PCH 4 55 99 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR-)-AT= 439.5 CAPACITY 592 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 592 CAPACITY USED= 9.29% IMPEDANCE CHEATED== .93 DEMAND (LOS=A) 55 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 440 CAPACITY 759 CRITICAL GAP= SSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= ADJUSTED CAPACITY 759 CAPACITY USED= 13.04% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .91 DEMAND (LOS=A) 99 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . SAR+AT•+-AL+BL+BT+BR+DT-i-DR= 646.5 CAPACITY :71-.)4 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .91 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 277 CAPACITY USED= 1.44% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C) 4 L I t i 33 l t S (f LOS = Level of Service (11/89) 1 On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting volUUme equals0.75 of PCH ~ 1 i 1 NEW UAW I UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET Bull Mountain Road at East Access Date of Count: TT (Zoned) Day of Week; Weet:da y Roma Time of Day: AM Perak: Hour ;;;:::>:;:;•:;:x>:> AX'-:>: Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: ;:>:>:XxV ;<;<>:x>:>:>:>:r,>: A s_r%:B 0%-.C Bull Mtn 1-11 SHARED LANES: AP'P'ROACH C: none >1 C - East Access , . APPROACH . `>:>A . . , ? ..:-C . , . , . >>B< <<; MOVEMENT AL - T AR : DL DT DR : CL CF CR BL ST BR VOLUMES G 441 14 O 0 C t 5 o 25 80 127 U PCH 6 20 Be 1- ~ RIGHT TURNS FROM r ~ (CFt, CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR•+•AT= 448 CAPACITY 586 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 586 ' CAPACITY USED= 4.78% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (LOS=A) 28 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR-FAT= 455 CAPACITY 746 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 746 CAPACITY USED= 11.8% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .92 DEMAND (LOS=A) Be LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR+AT+AL-4-BL+EPT•+-BR+DT-T)R= 655 CAPACITY 300 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT- .92 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 276 CAPACITY USED= 2.17% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .90 DEMAND (LOS=C) 6 i i LOS = Level of Service (11189) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH UNS I GNAL 17-ED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WC)R1<:'.SI•AEE:T Bull Mountain Road at East Access Date of Count: TTO::'roposed) Day of Week:: Weekday 7' i me o•f Day . AM Pea!-.: 'r;our ::>1ellAX . x:..,VXX Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major- street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: Bull Mtn SHAFTED LANES- X APPROACH C. nor-se C East Access AP'P'ROACH A<• <<:::<::<........::-D<::<::<:<:::.... , ...::•C•:::<:::: ; :.....:•B<::. MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL` DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 449 1 c:+ 0 4 t.+ 50 90 127 PCH 4 55 99 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR-+-AT=: 449.5 CAPACITY 585 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE: ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAP'ACIT'Y 5£35 CAPACITY USED== 9.399999% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .93 DEMAND (LOS=A) 55 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 450 CAPACITY 750 CRITICAL GAP= SSEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT== 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 750 CAPACITY USED= 1=.2% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .91 DEMAND (LOS-=A) 99 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) r CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR-+-AT+AL•4-EIL•+•BT+BR•+DT+I)R= 666.5 CAPACITY 29~' CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. :IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .91 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 26'7 CAPACITY USED= 1.5% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C) 4• i i i i s' Ii 1 f I ~ LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets; with 4 lanes, conflicting v01 uume equal s0. 75 of PCH S -7 X41 4 4-1 Fl~ Existin Site (as zoned) 4- 413 z s 4j 4~7 Lo, "4;7 4 4-1 It F~ *j 183 10 I I r4 46-L 4 N E+S(As Zoned) 44 4~ tF* Site (proposed) 14 y s E+S(Proposed) 4j 141. 4~ 1 45 *j -4- 4~ a~ TT(As-Zoned) y 4't 1* Traffic Growth -L I) ~ col E+S=Existing+Site TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd Robert i ~T ~c«SS KEECH ASSOCIATES INC, CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 UNS IGNAL I ZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORk::Sf•t#rET Bull Mountain Road at East Access Date o•f CUUilt : E-1-S(Zoned) Day of Week: Week-.day, Time of Day: P11 Peak: Hour- ,.XxX:::::::c>;::> >:>:x::::x Prevailing Speed: 40 B #i: of lanes on major street: 2 ( A APPROACH GRADES: Bull Mtn SHARED LANES: APPROACH C: rinne C x East Access APPROACH B<:.... . 4 MOVEMENT ALI AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 183 a 0 0 20 0 111 47 473 0 PCH 22 122 52 L RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+•AT= 187 CAPACITY 908 L CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= ADJUSTED CAPACITY eoe CAPACITY USED= 15.1% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .89 DEMAND (LOS=A) 122 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 191 CAPACITY 991 _ CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 991 CAPACITY USED= 5.25% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND'S (LOS=A) 52 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW . SAR-i-AT-r-AL+BL--t-BT-t-BFi-i-DT+DR= 707 CAPACITY 2? =i CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .96 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 262 CAPACITY USED= B.399999% IMPEDANCE CREATED= ,94 DEMAND (LOS=C) 22 l-- t f LOS = Level of Service (11!89) i On major streets with A. lanes, conflicting volUume equalsO.75 of PCH UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORk'SHEET BLAll Mountain Road at East Access DaLte of Count: E ~ C';?(Pr posed ) Day of Week: Weekday Time of Day: 1='M Peak: Hour ;:;'.•;:;:;;;t:r;;;..,.,.:.......,...,,.,..,... Prevailing Speed: 45 B #f: of lanes on major street: 2 A AP'P'ROACH GRADES: Bul1 Mtn x SHARED LANES: APPROACH C: none C East Access--.; APPROACH A., ,X < MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR - VOLUMES 0 186 4 0 0 0 23 44 482 0 PCH -2" : 48 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 188 CAPACITY 907 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAI='ACITY 807 CAPACITY USED= 3.1% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (L.OS=A) 25 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 190 CAPACITY 99 CRITICAL GAPS= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 992 CAPACITY USED= 4.84% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .97 DEMAND (L DS=A) 48 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL_) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR+C-1T+ALa-BL-i-L-iT•+BF<-i-Dl'+DR=: 714 CAPACITY 270 CRITICAL_ GAF- 7. ;SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTEE.-- r= .97 ADJUSTED CAP'ACIT'Y 2. 6':' CAPACITY USED= .76% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND. (LOS=C:) via= Blow I LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting Vol uume equal sti. 75 of PCH i i Emu i UNS I GNAL I Z.ED INTERSECTION • CAPAC I TY WORKSk-!EET Bull Mountain Road at East Access s . _ Date of Counts TT(Zoned) ( Day of Week:: Wee4::day Time of Day: PM Peak Hour- s :;>;:;:;:;XX1.,1.11X IA;;;;;;;;;;,;;;:a>;;; F'r evai 1. my Speed. 45 B # of lanes can major street: 2 _ ~ APPROAC14 GRADES: Bull Mtn SHARED LANES: „ APPROACH C: none C East Access APPROACH MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 20 1 8 t) t 20 0 i 1 1 47 518 0 PCH 22 122 52 RIGHT TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .511P+AT= 205 CAPACITY 791 CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 791 CAPACITY USED= 15.42% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .89 DEMAND (LOS=A) 122 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CONFLICTING FLOC=1 AR+AT= 209 CAPACITY 971 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE: ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 971 CAPACITY USED= 5.36% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=A) 52 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL-) CONFLICTING FLOW . 5AR•FAT-FAL-4-BL-FEIT-FE+R•+-DT+DF.= 770 CAPACITY 251 CRITICAL GAP= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= .96 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 2.11 CAPACITY USED= 9.13% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .94 DEMAND (LOS=C) 22 f_ { I { LOS = Level of Service (11/89) f On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equalsO.75 of PCH OEM= UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORI`:SHEET Bull Mountain Road at East Access Date of Count: TT(Proposed) Day of Week:: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak: Hour" : 45 Prevailing :•;:"•;:::•;:;:•:;•::;:;:;:•;:•;XxXXx:•;:::::;:i;;:•;:;:•;:: y Speed I B # of lanes on major street: 2 A APPROACH GRADES: Bull Mtn SHARED LANES: APPROACH C: none C x Ea=,t Access i RE'P'ROACH A : . ; C >X> MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR jCL CT CR BL BT BR I VOLUMES 0 219 4 0 0 0 2 0 23 44 527 0 ~ PCH 2 25 4B s RIGHT" TURNS FROM C (CR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT= 221 CAPACITY 777 C CRITICAL GAP= 6SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 777 CAPACITY USED= 3.22% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .98 DEMAND (LOS=A) 25 LEFT TURNS FROM B (BL) CAPACITY 957 CONFLICTING FLOW AR+AT= 223 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 957 CAPACITY USED= 5.02% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS=A) 48 LEFT TURNS FROM C (CL) CONFLICTING FLOW .5AR+AT+AL+BL+BT+BR+DT+DR= 79'2 CAPACITY 243 CRITICAL GAF'= 7.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT .96 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 233 CAPACITY USED= .86% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=C) t ! I I I LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflictinu voluume equa1sQ.75 of PCH _min - MEN M1. T M - ~ 4 19 330 4 r 7 9 Exl5tin Site (as zoned) s .T 0 4- ~~4 ~ 35q ~"1ti F* s~ ~l~f~ 'O`ff ~ ~ ^ ~ T ~ 17 E+S(As Zoned) 4j4- ~ ` ~d 3g~i ~?r~ Site (propos ) ,,Z T T7 E+S(Proposed) a 4J4-44- I iy N 4 30 _ C- a= 4- 1o TT(As-Zoned) 4J4-4 ~ ` Traff i Growth u~y ~ 3 E+S=EXistinq+Site TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd Robert ~~<< pT PA~,~~ ~~y KEECH ASSOCIATES IN P~~L CONSULTING TRAFFIC E IN64 6R3 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND 0 97 I , S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3. - 2/89 DATE: 02-19-1.992 (PAGE 2 OF 2) i LOCATION: FULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/EXISTING r DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 VOLUME: 40 1591. C-) 0 9 7 8i) 0 67 tub u i i ) SAT. FLOW: 1693 +565 c.) 0 3565 151.5 0 030 1515 i) t-) FLOW RATIO: 0.02 0.45 0. 00 0. OC-) 0.26 0.05 (-).0(--) 0. 12 i)7 0.00 0.00 Q. 00 CAPACITY: 63 2643 0 0 2391 1016 0 592 291 i? t r c_) VOL. /CAP.: 0.63 0.60 0.00 C.)0 0.39 0.08 0.00 t.).63 o.36 u. 00 o.00 0.0(=) GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 6.4 69.7 0. 0 0. (d 63.4 63.4 0.0 20.3 2u.3 t:. 0 t:.0 0.0 REQUIRED: 5.6 45.5 0.0 0.0 28.2 7.8 0.0 173. 5 9.3 0. 0 0. 0 s_), i_) MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC): 44 4 i ) 0 4 _ 0 2 20 0 t_) QUEUE (FT): 24 181 i) 0 114 17 0 99 55 0 t' 0 STOPS 96 28 0 0 31 25 0 70 67 0 0 i ) PHASE OPERATION! (SEC) ) NB THRU 8< LEFT 6.4 7.1 LOST TIME/PHASE: .0 SEC: NB & SB THRU 63.4 70.4 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC" ED & WB GREEN 20. 22. CYCLE LENGTH: 90.0 SEC ALL RED TIME: 0. 0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0.57 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.63 LEFT TURN CHECk:: NB SEq ED WB VOLUME: 40 PROTECTION (PROT /PERP'I) : PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: PROTECTED CAPACITY: 6= EXCESS LEFT TURNS: 0 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) OARS) (GAL) VEHICLES r NORTHBOUND A 14.7 0.7 1.2 118 6 { SOUTHBOUND A 4.1 0.4 0.7 76 _ a EASTBOUND C -9,11.9 t7. 9 1. 1 82 6 WESTBOUND A (,..0 0. is is i~ t:) INTERSECTION B 7.1 2.0 .0 276 14 (UNIT VALUES: 00 P 1 . i.)t_) $ 0. 02) i s OEM i S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/E39 DATE: U2-19-1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AN4/EXISTING VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN -VOLUME ~(VPH) : 36 0 33o to THRU VOLUME (VPH) : 1432 834 ci RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH) : C) 72 95 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH) : 0 0 0 0 VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH): 1469 906 425 0 ( DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PAR41"ING MANEUVERS (#/H)- 0 0 0 t_± LANE UTILIZATION(XI00): 100 100 100 100 t ARRIVAL TYPE (X 1 C)) : ,i? 3C) 30 30 _ PEAK:: HOUR FACTOR (X i oo) : 90 90 9o 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 0 C? LOCAL BUSES (.#/H): 0 0 C) U HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE 0 0 t) C) AREA TYPE: NON--BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC): 0 0 -0 C) MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC) : i.) c i 0 c_) APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 25 25 25 25 SNEAk'ERS (X io/CYCLE) : 20 20 2C' 20 LANE WIDTH #1 (FT". 12 12 12 C) LANE WIDTH #2 (FT): 12 12 12 C) LANE WIDTH #3 (FT) : 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #4 (1= T) : C) C) C) C ) LANE WIDTH #5 (FT): 0 G u j LANE WIDTH #6 (FT) : t) C) i ) i ) CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED, E/W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU ° RIGHT MOVEMENT(S) EAST-WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTH-SOUTH PHASING: ND LEFT PROTECTED t APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION 1 TURN DESCRIPTION ' 1 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE. PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 LEFT: NOT' APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY f 1 _ RIGHTS= ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 1 LEFT: PE:D. FRICTION.! ONLY EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERI11. 3 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE i S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/89 DATE: 02-19•-1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/E+S(ZONED) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH): 56 0 359 0 ( THRU VOLUME (VPH) : 1432 8 3Lb it i_r P_.. RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH) : 0 135 1.04 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH): 0 it ? it VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH): 1498 969 46.31 0 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT ` PARk::ING MANEUVERS (#/H) : 0 it t_r 0 ti ` LANE UTILIZATION(Xl(:)()): 100 100 100 100 ARRIVAL TYPE (X10) : 30 ,_,tr ._,p 30 PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR (X l oo) : 90 90 90 9i) PROT. RIGHT TURNS : cr it 0 0 3 LOCAL BUSES (#k/H) : 0 i t 0 C-) HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE i i i_r i f i t AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC)- C! 0 c--! s! MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC?: i t U c t i) APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 25 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (XIO/CYCLE) : 20 20 2c) 2s) LANE WIDTH #1 (FT) 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT): 1..' 12 12 Q LANE WIDTH #3 (FT): 12 12 12 C! LANE WIDTH #4 (FT): 0 0 0 it LANE WIDTH #5 (FT): it 0 0 0 LANE WIDTH #6 (FT). tj G 0 0 COKITROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED. E/W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU & RIGHT MOVEMENT(S) EAST--WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED { NORTH-SOUTH PHASING: NB LEFT PROTECTED 1. APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION I TURN DESCRIPTION' 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONLY EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHTS ONLY I RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/89 DATE: 02--19-199":..` (FACIE 2 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/E-FS(ZONED) DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP# 1 GP#2 GP#3 GP# 1 GP#2 GP#3 GP# 1 GP#2 GP#? GP# 1 GP# ' GF'#. VOLUME: 6 1091 0 0 927 150 i) 399 116 r-) i; Cr SAT. FLOW: 1693 3565 Cr 0 3565 %515 0 003Cr 1510 0 0 C) ~ FLOW RATIO: 0.04 0.45 0. 00 0.00 0.26 0.10 0.00 C1.13 0.08 0. o0 0.00 r C)(_) CAPACITY: 97 2597 0 0 2274 966 C) 621 11 C.? Cr 0 i VOL. /CAP.: 0.64 0.61 t_r, Crc;) 0.00 0.41 0.16 0, oC) 0.64 (.-).37 0, 0C) 0. o O r). Crc_) s GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) I._ AVAILABLE: 8.1 68.6 o.0 0, 0 6(-.).4 60, 4 0. i_) 21.4 21.4 0. 0 0.0 0 C) r 3 REQUIRED: 6.9 45.0 0.0 0. 0 28.2 11.7 0. 0 14.3 9.8 (r, 0 C), c:r 0. i_) MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS f DELAY (SEC): 41 4 0 0 5 4 0 20 0 C) ci QUEUE (FT) : 37 190 0 0 125 6 t i 106 60 C) t i C) STOPS 83 30 C) 0 35 310 0 69 67 0 0 Cr 3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) NB THRU & LEFT B.1 9.1 LOST TIME/PHASE: Cr SEC NB & SB THRU 60.4 67.1 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC EB & WB GREEN 21.4 23-B CYCLE LENGTH: 90.0 SEC ALL RED TIME: 0. 0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0. 58 DEGREE OF SAT.- 0. 64 E LEFT TURN CHECk-. NB SD EB WD VOLUME: 62 mum OEM PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: 0 PROTECTED CAPACITY: 97 s jJ( EXCESS LEFT TURNS: C) i r SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOP'P'ED, COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES NORTHBOUND B 5.4 0.8 1." 1:2 6 SOUTHBOUND A 5.0 0.5 0.9 9 q. EASTBOUND C 21.5 1 . 1.2 Be 6 , WESTBOUND A o. 0 0. 0 C). C? 0 C) t I NTERSECT I ON E+ 7. 8 2. 3, 3.4 .:13 17 4 i (UNIT VALUES: $ 3. 00 $ 1.00 $ 0.02) f j Ell fF_ S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 3-3 2/69 DATE: 02--19--1992 (PAGE I OF' 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/E+ S (F'ROF'OSED ) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH): 39 0 384 0 THRU VOLUME (VPH) : 14.32 934 0 si BIGHT TURN VOL. (VP'H): 0 8= 112 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH); 0 0 0 0 _ VEHICULAR VOLUME; (VF='H) : 1471 917 496 0 ~ 3 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEUVERS (#/H) : t.!- 0 D_ _ U- LANE UTILIZATION(XI00): 100 100 100 100 ARRIVAL TYPE (X 10) ; 30 3o 30 •30 PEA[:*.* HOUR FACTOR (X 100) ; 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS to 0 0 0 LOCAL BUSES (#/H): 0 0 0 0 HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE i r o AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRU GREED! (SEC) : 0 0 i) 0 MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC): 0 0 0 s.) AP'P'ROACH SPEED (11PH) : 25 25 25 25 SNEAF ERS (X l O/ CYCLE) : 20 20 2i) 20 ~l LANE WIDTH #1 (FT): 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT): 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #k3 (FT): 12 12 :12 0 LANE WIDThf #4 (FT): 0 0 i) i> LANE WIDTH #5 (FT) : 0 i~ C-a 0 LANE WIDTH #6 (FT): i) 0 i) 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED, E/W = ACTUATED OP'P'OSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU RIGHT MOVEMENT (S) EAST--WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTH-SOUTH PHASING: NB LEFT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUT' DESCRIPTION ! TURN DESCRIPTION 1 LEFTS ONLY LEFT: EXCLUSIVE. PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHT: NOT AP'P'LICABLE f f SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE 4( _ RIGHTS ONLY f RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONLY EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY ( _ RIGHTS ONLY f RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. E WESTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS { LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE i S. I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2!89 DATE: o2-19•-i992 (PAGE 2 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/E-+-S(PROPOSED) r DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP# 1 GP#2 GPd#.? GP# 1 GP#•k2 GP#3 GP#-1 GF1.' GP# GP# 1 GP# 2 GP# VOLUME: 43 1591 0 0 927 1?2 0 427 1.24 0 0 t? SAT. FLOW: 1693 3565 0 0 565 1515 0 ?i ? _,0 1515 Q { FLOW RATIO: 0.03 C). 45 0. 00 0. 00 0.26 0.06 0.00 C.). 14 0. 06 0.01) 0. 01_) 0. 0i-~ CAPACITY: 66 2.558 s ~ 0 2299 977 0 654 :327, t i 0 0 f VOL. /CAP.: 0.65 0. 62 0. 00 0. 00 0.40 0. 09 Q. 00 0. t:)5 0.38 0.00 0. 00 0.00 GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 6.5 67.6 u.0 0.Q 61.0 61.0 0.0 22.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 Q.0 REQUIRED: 5.8 45.5 0.0 0.0 28.2 8.5 0.0 15.1 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC): 46 4 0 5 4 0 22 19 i, 0 t i QUEUE (FT) : 26 198 0 o ' 123 21 0 113 64 (Y 0 r,• STOPS 86 32 0 c.> 34 28 0 69 66 0 0 0 :3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) NB THRU & LEFT 6.5 7.3 LOST TIME /PHASE:: 3.0 SEC - NB & SB THRU 61 . c:) 67.8 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC EB WB GREEN 22.4 24.9 CYCLE LENGTH: 90. SEC ALL RED TIME: 0.0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0.59 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.65 LEFT TURN CHECk: NEI SB E.B WB VOLUME: 43 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: 1 { PROTECTED CAPACITY: 66 i_. EXCESS LEFT TURNS: { SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ' LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST ? APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) -'FIRS) {GAL) VEHICLES ( ? NORTHBOUND B 5.5 0.8 1.4 1=5 6 SOUTHBOUND A 4.6 0.4 0,8 86 4 y EASTBOUND C 21.2 1.. 1 1..2 94 6 WESTBOUND A u.0 0.0 0 0 0 { INTERSECTION B 3.0 2.3 3.4 :316 17 (UNIT VALUES: 3.00 1.00 $ 0.02) i i i S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3.= - 2/89 DATE: Q2-19-1992 (PAGE 1 O 2) i LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AMITT(ZONED) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST" LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPI-1) : 59 0 .'fl9 C? THRU VOLUME ( VPH) : 1.572 914 0 i ) RIGHT TURN VOL.. ( VPH) : 0 142 114 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PF'H) : 0 0 0 C~ VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH) : 1631 1i?56 5(--)3 c_) DEMAND ADJUSTMENT" F'ARI•.-'ING MANEUVERS(#/H): i? 0 c_) 0 LANE UTILIZATION(XI00): 100 loo 100 1o0 ARRIVAL TYPE <X10): 30 30 30 30 F'EA} : HOUR FACTOR (X 1 )o) : 90 90 9t i 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 0 0 i) C- LOCAL BUSES (#/H): G 0 0 q HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE i ) i_) 0 c_? AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC) : U i--?~_- 0•-- ~ MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC): 0 0 t? o APPROACH SPEED (MPH).. 25 25 25 2:5 SNEAKERS (XiO/CYCL.E) : 20 20 20 2c:) LANE WIDTH #1 (FT): 12 12 12 i? LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 12 12 i.) - LANE WIDTH #3 (FT) : 12 12 i. 2 0 LANE WIDTH ##4 (FT) : t_) 0 t) 0 LANE WIDTH #5 (FT) : 0 i) 0 i) LANE WIDTH #6 (FT): 0 C) Q ? CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED. E/W = ACTUATED r OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU RIGHT h10VEMENT (S } 1 EAST--WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ll NORTH-SOUTH PHASING: ND LEFT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUT' DESCF I PT I ON 1 TURN DESCRIPTION I LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE. PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE I 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY _ RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE. PERM. 1 LEFT: PED. FRICTION ONLY EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY _ EIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE. PERM. r 1 LEFT: NOT kPPLICABL_E WE=STBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE i i lizilo • i S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/89 DATE: 02-19--1992 (PAGE 2 OF 2) ~ LOCATION: BULL. MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/TT(ZONED) ew.. DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP#i GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#:_ { S VOLUME: 66 1747 0 0 1016 1 58 0 4;32 1.27 0 0 i ) SAT. FLOW: 1693 X565 0 U ?565 1515 7-0 :30 1515 0 0 ; FLOW RATIO: 0.04 (x.49 t.),00 0.00 0.28 0.10 U.oc_) s), izI. C).ae o.cat) o. iii t),oo CAPACITY: 9: 26(.-)4 i_) i) 2299 973 C? 61 307 0 t) C) VOL. /CAP.: 0.70 0.67 0.00 0. 00 1).44 0.16 0. 0o 0. 7(-) o.41 0.00 0.00 r_), Qc_) GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 8. 0 69.7 0.0 i). c_r 6o. e 6(--).B 0. 0 21 21.3 0. 0 C). 0 0. c.) REQUIRED: 7.0 49.5 0.0 0. 0 30. 5 12.1 0.0 15.2 10. 4 0.0 (.-).o c,) MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC): 45 0 0 C C-) 23 20 C.) DUEUE (FT) : 4= 216 0 r_) 1=9 37 o 11G 66 0 is c_) STOPS 96 32 Q 0 36 30 0 71 67 U i) 0 3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) NB THRU & LEFT E3.0 8.8 LOST TIME/PHASE- 3.0 SEC . NB & SB THRU 60.8 67.5 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC EB & WB GREEN 21.3 23.6 CYCLE LENGTH: 90.0 SEC ALL RED TIME: c.).0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 0.63 DEGREE OF SAT.: Q.70 LEFT TURN CHECK NB SE, EB WB VOLUME: 66 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY- PROTECTED CAPACITY: 9: EXCESS LEFT TURNS: c_) SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES (F) NORTHBOUND B 6.(--) 1. 0 1.6 155 a SOUTHBOUND B 5.0 0.5 1. C.) 1 r;? 5 EASTBOUND C 22.6 1.1 1.3 98 WESTBOUND A 0. Q C). C) p 0 INTERSECTION B -8.= -+2.6 -3.9 _ 354 ---19 (UNIT VALUES: $ •3.00 $ 1.00 # 0.02) ` i ) i f~ I S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 3 - /89 DATE: 02--19-1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION:-BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/TT(PROPOSED) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN YVOLUME ~ (VPH) : 42 C) 414 0 fHRU VOLUME (VPH): 1572 914 0 0 RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH): 0 90 122 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH) : Q 0 0 0 VEHICULAR VOLUME ( VPH) : 1614 104-.)4 57,6 0 E DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEUVERS H) : f_) C) 0 U LANE UTILIZATION(XI00): 10C) 100 100 100 ARRIVAL TYPE (X 10) : 30 30 0 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 1 iiO) : 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 o 0 0 u LOCAL BUSES (#/H): 0 0 0 0 HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE 0 i s 0 G AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC): 0 0 C) 0 MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC): is 0 0 0 APPROACH SPEED (MPH) : 25 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (X1O/CYCLE): 2(:) 20 2C) 20 LANE WIDTH #t1 (FT) : 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 1 12 C) LANE WIDTH (FT). 12 12 12 s? LANE WIDTH ##4 (FT) : 0 0 0 0 LANE WIDTH.#5 (FT) : 0 0 C) LANE WIDTH #6 (FT).- 0 0 U CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED, E/W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU & RIGHT MOVEMENT(S) EAST-WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NOR"T"H--SOUTH PHASING: NB LEFT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION 1 TURN DESCRIPTION 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY i 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE ~ ' LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND THRUS ONLY i _ RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. LEFT: PED. FRIC"T"ION ONLY EASTBOU.4b 2 THRUS ONLY _ RIGS-{TS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, F1=F;M. 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE lqlvq~ lip Runs=, Emma S. 1. C. A. P. - VERSION _ 2/89 DATE: 02-19-4992 (PAGE. 2 OF 2) I LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: AM/TT(PROPOSED) 11 DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH cA:iT wE ST TABLE GP# 1 GP##2 GP#3 GP## 1 GP#2 GP#3 GP# 1 GP#2 GPN 3 GP# 1 GP#2 GP#" VOLUME: 47 1747 0 0 1016 loo C) 460 136 C) 0 ci SAT. FLOW: 1693 565 0 0 3065 1515 0 303C? 1515 0 0 FLOW RATIO: 0.03 (--).49 0.00 0. 0C-) 0.28 O.o7 iv. 00 i).1`; x_1.09 0.00 Ca.CdO C).C-)iY ry CAPACITY: 65 2568 0 0 _;12 98 o 643 323 0 0 VOL. /CAP.: Q.71 i;, 68 0. 00 0.00 0. 44 0.10 0. C)s~ C.).71 0.42 00 0. C)t? C). C)Ca GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 6.5 67. 8 0. 0 i_). U 61.4 61.4 0. 0 22.2 22.2 C), 0 0. 0 C). REQUIRED: 6.0 49. 5 0. C) i1. C? 30.5 8.9 0.0 15.9 10. 9 C). Ca C). C) t). G MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC): 52 5 G 0 5 4 0 23 20 C) t-? Cl QUEUE ( FT) : 33 224 [ i C) 1:36 2.-1 11 125 70 0 Id r_) STOPS - 89 34 0 C) 35 28 0 70 67 C) 0 C) 3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) L: NB THRU LEFT 6.0 7.2 LOST TIME/PHASE: '.C? SEC NB & SB THRU 61.4 68.2 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.C? SEC EB & WB GREEN 22.2 24. 6 CYCLE LENGTH: 90. C) SEC AL.I- RED TIME: 0. 0 SET-; FLOW RATIO: C).64 DEGREE OF SAT.: o.71. LEFT TURN CHECI,:: NB SB EEC WD VOLUME: 47 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: r) PROTECTED CAPACITY: 65 EXCESS LEFT TURNS: C) SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES NORTHBOUND B 6. 0 1. 0 1.6 1.5(3 8 SOUTHBOUND A 4.9 0.5 0.9 95 4 EASTBOUND C 22.3 1..,? 1.4 104 7 WESTBOUND A Q.0 (7 C. C? i~ INTERSECTION -B e.4 ' 2.7 --3.9 357 - 19 i (UNIT VALUES: $ =.00 $ 1.00.) $ 0. 02) 00 M f Zr _r 4- OD 4-- F* I Existing Site (as zoned) N 4- 4 285 ~I FF CD At- n- E+S(As Zoned) 4-J-4-i+,qW- Site (proposed) o co - Cn - 40- E+S(Proposed) a ~ *j 1.11, 4 } y o o TT(As-Zoned) *j L* Traffic Growth 4~?ice E¢~=Exi~tingf~rif® TT=Total Traffic TT(Proposed) Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd R o b e rt Burl mou►,4,,;o 44-.o Arv ?Pc,r)c. 44~ww KEECH ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING TRAFFIC EQNR1225 NW MURRAY BLVD PORTLAND OR 97229 15031641-6333 loam i S. I . C. A. F•. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/8? DATE: 02-19-1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM/EXISTING VOLUMES NORTH SOUTI-•1 L='AS'T' WEST t Q LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH): 67 0 194 0 OEM THRU VOLUME (VPH) : 1028 1543 i 0 RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH): 0 340 74 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPP-D : 0 r? 0 i ? VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH): 1095 1FJ91 260 it DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARP,*:ING MANEUVERS _0 0 t G LANE UT I L I 7_ AT I ON (X .100) : l 100 100 100 IY ARRIVAL TYPE (X10) : 30 '0 30 [ PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 100) : 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 0 0 0 LOCAL. BUSES (#/H) : 0 0 HEAVY VEHICLES f is } : 2 2 2 AP'P'ROACH GRADE ("4) „ 0 Q o 0 AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA -=._.;_.-=-=~_w= MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC): 0 0 0 t_) MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC) : 0 t_? 0 i? APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 25 'S 25 25 SNEAKERS (X 10/CYCLE) : 20 20 20 20 LANE WIDTH #1 (FT): 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 1 1.2 0 LANE WIDTH #3 (FT) : i.2 12 12 ~ ~e LANE WIDTH #4 (FT) : t"? 0 0 0 LANE WIDTH ##5 (FT) : 0 t? ii 0 LANE WIDTH ##6 (FT)- t? t? 0 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED. E/W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU ?4 R I GI•-IT MOVEMENT(S) EAST--WEST PHASING: NEITHEP TURN PROTECTED f NORTH--SOUTH PHASING: NB LEFT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION 1 TURD.! DESCRIPTION LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROT. NORTHBOUND THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 LEFT- NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY _ RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE. PERM. 1 LEFT: PED. FRICTION! ONLY EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE. PERM. 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE 14ESTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE ill ig ill I S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION .3 - 2/89 DATE: 02-19--1992 (I='AGE 2 OF 2) OCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM/EXISTING LOCATION::' DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP# 1 GP#2 GP#.? GP# i GP#2 GP# = GP# 1 GP# 2'' GP##3 GP# 1 GP GPit.3 s 1 VOLUME: 74 1142 0 o 1714 387 0 216 82 0 0 i SAT. FLOW: 1693 3565 O 3565 1515 Q .3(:) ;Ci 1515 c_r 0 C. 1 FLOW RATIO: 0. 04 (:).._,2 0. CK) c_). 00 0.48 0.26 Q. 00 0. (."~7 0.05 0. 00 0. 00 C) - CEO CAPACITY: 112 2945 0 C) 2589 1100 C) 326 165 0 0 0 VOL. /CAP.: 0.66 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.35 0.00 s~.66 0.51 0.00 0.(:)(:) 0.00 GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 9.0 77. 3 0. 0 (3. 0 68.4 66.4 0. 0 12.7 12.7 o. 0 0. C) o. C) REQUIRED: 7.3 3w•.8 0.C) (-).0 49.6 24.2 0.0 9.4 43.0 (-),o C).G Vii,q MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS i DELAY (SEC): 40 1 U 0 4 C) 7 26 C) i QUEUE (FT) : 45 78 i? 0 214 77 U 62 47 0 0 t STOPS : 93 _ 0 C) 32 0 74 73 C) C) C) 3 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) NB THRU LEFT 9.C) 10.0 LOST TIME/PHASE: 3.0 SEC NB & SB THRU 68.4 76.o TOTAL LAST TIME: 9. 0 SEC ED & WB GREEN 12.7 14.1 CYCLE: LENGTH.- 90.0 SEC ALL RED TIME: C).0 SEC FLOW RATIO: C). 60 DEGREE OF SAT.: o.66 y LEFT TURN CHECK. NB SB L=Ps l.lB VOLUME: 74 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: C PROTECTED CAPACITY: 112 a EXCESS LEFT TURNS: C) SYSTEM PERFORMANCE= LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST ) APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES NORTHBOUND A 3.7 C).4 Q.4 25 2 SOUTHBOUND A 4.2 ci.8 1. S 160 7 EASTBOUND D 26.9 0.7 C).a 55 4 WESTE+OUND A i 0 i) 0. C) i? C) INTERSECTION + B `-5.9 _ 1.9 2.7 T240 --__...13 (UNIT VALUES: $ 3. 0C-) s 1. 00 $ 0.02) VERSION 3. 3 - 2/S9 DATE. 02--19-1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION: PM/E-?-S(ZONED) PERIOD: BULL MTN PACIFIC HWY VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH): 82 C? 285 0 THRU VOLUME (VPH) : 1025 1543 s) o RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH) : 0 =i96 102 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL_. (PPH) : 0 Q C) 0 VEF4I CULAR VOLUME (VPH) : 11 1C.) 19 T9 397 c> DEMAND ADJUSTMENT _ PARKING MANEUVERS / H) : 0 t) D 0 LANE UTILIZATION (X l o(-.)) : 1 loo 100 100 1., ARRIVAL TYPE (X 1 C)) : ._,i? RC) 30 310 PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 100) : 90 90 90 94) PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 0 0 C) ` LOCAL BUSES (#/H)-. 0 i. 0 C? HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE : c i 0 C? 0 AREA TYPE.: NDN-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRRU GREEN (SEC!: C? t) 0 C? ! MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC): 0 0 C) 0 'APPROACH SPEED (MPH) - 25 25 25 25 .A SNEAKERS (X l /CYCL.E) : 20 20 20 20 LANE WIDTH #1 (FT)- 12" 12 117, 0 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 12 14C) LANE WIDTH #3 (FT)- i. 121 12 i. LANE WIDTH #4 (FT) 0 ij C? LANE WIDTH 14'5 (FT): 0 C, 0 0 LANE WIDTH #h (FT) : 0 0 C) i_? CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED, E /W' = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU RIGHT MOVEMENT(S) EAST-WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTH-SOUTH PHASING. N13 L_EI"T PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION TURN DESCRIPTION 1. LEFTS ONLY LEFT: EXCLUSIVE. PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY _ RIGHTS ONLY I RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE:', PERM. LE_F=T: PED. FRICTION ONLY EASTBOUND THRU S ONLY FRIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT:1,EXCLUSIVE. PERM. LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND ? ALL MOVEMENTS RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 7Tr" G 1'Ef ST . 3 I vr.tO~d . - =i2/89 DATE: 0'-19-199:•'. (PAGE OF 2) . LOCATION: PM/E+S(ZOI\IED) PERIOD- BULL MTN PACIFIC HWY DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP# 1 GP#2 GP#3 GP# 1 GP42 .0P#3 GF # 1 GP# ' GF'# GP# 1 GP# GF'# 2: :1 . 1 VOLUME: 91. 1142 G 0 1714 440 7,1.7 11' 0 0 0 SAT. FLOW: 1693 3565 0 0 •,565 1010 0 3030 151.0 i.) i) ~ . FLOW RATIO: 0.05 0.32 0.00 0.00 4g 0.'.2 9 0. 00 0.10 07 o.(--)(-) C). (:r0 Q. o(:' # CAPACITY: 128 2803, 0 t_) 2414 1026 C) 446 223 0 C.) C-) VOL. /CAF',.: 0.71. 0. q.1 tj, 0(:) iJ, 0C? 0.71. 0.43 Or? 0.71 o.51. i?. iui i), 00 i), fjr_) i GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 9.8 73. 8 o. o 0. 0 63.9 63.9 Q 16.2 16.2 0. ;_r 0. c_? 0. 0 F 1._ REQUIRED: 8.5 _.*3.8 0.(:) G.(.) 48.6 27.0 0.0 12.1 9.7 u.(:) ().o o.C) ~ MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC): 42 2 0 0 6 4 26 24 r) 0 QUEUE (FT): 59 96 0 0 25 105 0 91 63 0 0 0 STOPS 84 1 i 0 40 31 Q 31 7" 7 1 t:? 0 0 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) r NB THRU LEFT 9.Q 10.9 LOST TIME/PHASE: ?.0 SEC NB & SD THRU 63.9 71. 1 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9. C? SEC EB WB GREEN 16. 2 18. Q CYCLE LENGTH: 9(--). i r SEC ALL RED TIME: (--).0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 64 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.71 L LEFT TURN CHECK NB SE+ EF, WEI VOLUME: 91. PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT ) PERMITTED CAPACITY: (_i PROTECTED CAPACITY: 128 EXCESS LEFT TURNS: C? SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST AP'P'ROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEI4 I CLES ( ) NORTHBOUND A 4.9 0.5 0.7 56 SOUTHBOUND B 5.9 1.2 2.0 207 1(,) EASTBOUND D 25.6 1.i? 1.1 78 6 WESTBOUND A (i. i_) 0.(-, INTERSECTION ~B y~ 7.'S 2.7 3.8 - - 7,41 - - ^ 19 ` (UNIT VALUES: ~ 3. 0(,) $ 1.00 $ 0. 02) I Hill NINE il~j~ 11161 i i S.I.C.A.P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/89 DATE: 02--19--199:' (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: F'M/E-FS (PROPOSED) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH) : B-5 G 20 0 j THRU VOLUME (VPH) : 1028 1.543 0 0 RIGHT TURD! VOL. (VPH): 0 401 B 0 f PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH): i_) 0 0 it VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH) : 1111 1944 302 0 1 i i DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEUVERS /H) . C) 0 0 0 LANE UTILIZATION (X 1 t= 0) : 100 100 100 100 i ARRIVAL TYPE (X 10) : 30 7.0 30 30 3 PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 1 Do) : 90 90 90 90 3 J PROT. RIGHT TURNS : 0 0 0 0 LOCAL BUSES (#!H): 0 0 0 0 r HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 r APPROACH GRADE i t C) 0 0 } AREA TYPE: NON-BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA s MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC) : c_) f? 0 MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC) : C) 0 ti 0 APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 25 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (`•4 i O/ CYCLE) : 20 2(-") 2(--) 20 LANE WIDTH #?1 (FT): 1 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #3 (FT): 1 12 12 0 LANE WIDTH #4 (FT): 0 0 0 0 LANE WIDTH #5 (FT) : 0 0 C) to LANE W I DT;H #b (FT) : 0 i s t r 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED. E/W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU RIGHT 111OVEMENT(S) EAST--WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTH-SOUTH PHASING-. NB LEI-••T PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP=' DESCRIPTION 1 TURN DESCRIPTION ; 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROT. NORTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY 31 RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT: F'T: 1'EL). FRICTION ONLY s EASTBOUND 'THRL ~S ONLY { RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. i 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND. 2 ALL MOVEMENTS j 1 RIGHT: NOT APPL I CAFiLE (j 1 i i i OWN S. I.C,A.P. - VERSION 3* _ - 2189 DATE: 11.25•-19-1992 IPAGE 2 OF 21 LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM / E-i- S ( P'ROP'OSED ) DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH FAST WEST TABLE GP#1 GF'#2 GPI#3 GP# i GP#2 GP#7, GP*1 GP#2 GP#I.' GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 VOLUME: 92 11.42 Q 0 1714 446 0 244 91 C r 0 ~ r SAT. FLOW: 1693 3565 0 0 =565 1.515 Ca 151.5 0 Q c:a I . FLOW RATIO: C). 05 C). 32 U, 00 0, 00 0. 48 (--).29 r_). r?o as. C?8 s_a. G6 0, 0Cr C?. 00 C). 010 CAPACITY: 135 2'908 0 0 2505 1065 0 357 179 Q 0 0 VOL. /CAI°'.: C?. 68 p..39 0.00 0. Cx> i?. 69 0. 42 0. 0o i!. 60 0.51 C?. o0 Cr, 00 Cy. 0(') GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 10.2 76. 4 c.). U Cy. 0 66.2 66.2 0. 0 13.6 13.6 0. 0 0. C) r_r, ci REQUIRED: 8. 33.8 0. 0 0.0 48.6 27.3 tr. 0 10.2 8.5 O. C? 0, 0 0, it MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC) : 40 1 0 0 5 4 27 25 t:r Cr t_r QUEUE ( FT) : 56 8:27, C? 0 2 98 Cr 71 5'.~ 1) 0 0 STOPS 83 6 Ca i.r 3.6 28 0 74 72 C) 0 t i PHASE OPERATION (SEC) (i) NB THRU 9< LEF"T 10.2: 1.1.3 LOST TIME/PHASE: 3.0 SEC' NB & SB THRU 66.2 7:3.6 TOTAL LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC ED c,. WB GREEN 173. . 6 15.1 CYCLE LENGTH: 9o.0 SEC: ALL RED 1" I ME : 0. C? SEC, FLOW RATIO: 0.62 DEGREE OF SAT.: ?.68 LEFT TURN CHECK N9 SD ED WB VOLUME: 92 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: PROTECTED CAPACITY: 135 EXCESS LEFT TURNS: 0 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (FIRS) (GAL) VEHICLES ( ) NORTHBOUND A 4. 0.5 G. S 37 _ SOUTHBOUND A F G 1. (i t, f? 186 8 EASTBOUND D 26.7 U. B i_r. 9 62 5 WESTBOUND A i?.C.) (j. C? C",.; t, r:? I NTERSE:CT I ON L 9 6.7 2.3 3.2 _ 285 - 16 (UNIT VALUES: ~ ,.QC) $ 1.00 ~ Q.02) i i~ i I soils= S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 3.3 - 2/89 DATE=: 02-19--1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM/TT(ZONED) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST i LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPH) : 92 is 299 i_a THRU VOLUME (VPH): 1128 1693 0 0 RIGHT TURN VOL. (VPH) : 0 431 106 0 PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH) : 0 0 0 0 a VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH) : 1221--) 2124 405 0 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEUVERS (##/H) : 0 0 0 0 LANE UTILIZATION(X100) : 100 100 100 100 s ARRIVAL TYPE (X 10) : 3 a 30 30 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 100) : 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 0 0 0 - LOCAL BUSES (#/H>- 0 i_a c.a 0 HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 APPROACH GRADE 0 c_a c_a i? AREA TYPE: NON--BUSINESS DISTRICT f CONTROL_ DATA MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC): i 0 0 MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC): 0 0 is is Y APPROACH SPEED (MPH): 25 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (X 10/CYCLE) : 20 20 20 20 LANE WIDTH #1 (FT): 12 1 12 0 LANE WIDTH 42 (FT): 12 12 12 Q LANE WIDTH # (FT)-. 12 12 i2 to LANE WIDTH #4 (FT) : 0 to i1 c1 LANE WIDTH #5 (FT)- iA 0 c_a is LANE WIDTH #6 (FT) : is c:a CONTROLLER.TYPE: N/S = ACTUATED. E/W = ACTUATED OPPOSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: THRU RIGHT MOVEMENT(S) EAST--WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTH-:SOUTH PHASING: NR LEFT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUP DESCRIPTION 1 TURN DESCRIPTION 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE. PROT. j NORTHBOUND THRUS ONLY i 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY ' RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT: PED. FRF.CTION ONLY C EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE WESTBOUND ALL MOVEMENTS e 1 RIGHT- NOT APPLICABLE S. I . G. A. P. - VERSION _ - 2/89 DATE: 02--19--1992 (PAGE 2 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM/TT(ZONED) DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP# 1 GP#2 GP# GP# 1 GP#2 G P # 3 GP1# 1 GP#2 GP#:' OF'# 1 GP#2 GP# 71 _ VOLUME: 102 1253 b C? 1881 479 0 3 lie c_? f SAT. FLOW: 1693 3565 G i.) 3565 1515 0 3030 1515 0 t i t FLOW RATIO: (--),O6 o.35 0.o0 (_1.00 0.53 0.32 0.OC? C?. i1 0.OB 0.O0 O.0(.) 0.0o C'AI='ACITY.- 132 2824 0 0 2427 10 52 0 429 214 C.) 0 C-) Vol-. /CAP.: 0.78 0.44 0. 00 O. 00 0.78 0.46 0., 00 0. 78 C_).55 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT.(SEC:) AVAILABLE: 1(?. 0 74. 3 0.0 o.0 64.3 64.3 s_?. 0 1.5.7 15.7 O. C-) 0. C) C.I. 0 REQUIRED: 9. 1 36. 7 C). 0 0.0 52.9 29.0 0.0 12.5 9, 9 0.0 Q. 0-1 0.01 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC): 47 0 0 7 4 0 29 25 0 C) s.? QUEUE (FT) : 76 105 0 294 115 0 10 73, 66 0 0 STOPS 87 1.3 0 s-) 4.3 32 0 75 72 0 C) C) PHASE OPERATION (SEC) NB THRU 84 LEFT 10.0 11.1 LOST TIME/PHASE: 3.0 SEC NE's & SB THRU 64. 71.4 TOTAL LOST TIME. 9.0 SEC ED & WD GREEN 15.7 17.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 9(--). 0 SEC ALL- RED TIME: 0.0 SEC FLOW RATIO: 70 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.70 cow LEFT TURN CHECK: NB S; ED WD REM _ VOLUME: 102 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: 0 PROTECTED CAPACITY: 132 EXCESS LEFT TURNS: 0 ( SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST APPROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL) VEHICLES NORTHBOUND L. 5.4 0.7 0.8 63 4 SOUTHBOUND H 6.6 1.4 2.4 241 11 EASTBOUND D 27.7 1.1 1.2' s4 6 WESTBOUND A C). o (-.).o ij. i> r? C) INTERSECTION - B 8. 5 _ 4.4 --38e 22 (UNIT VALUES: 1. 00 $ 0. 02) 1 i S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION 2/89 DATE: (-)2-19--1992 (PAGE 1 OF 2) i LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM/TT(PROPOSED) VOLUMES NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LEFT TURN VOLUME (VPI-I) : 93 C) 234 0 THRU VOLUME (VP'H): 1128 1693 C? 0 RIGHT TURN VOL, (VPH): 0 436 86 C? PEDESTRIAN VOL. (PPH): 0 0 c) 0 C) VEHICULAR VOLUME (VPH) : 1221 2129 320 DEMAND ADJUSTMENT PARKING MANEUVERS(#/H): 0 0 C? C) LANE UTILIZATION(XIOO): 100 100 100 100 ARRIVAL TYPE (X10) : 3o 30 30 ._}C? PEAK HOUR FACTOR (X 1 OO) : 90 90 90 90 PROT. RIGHT TURNS 0 0 G 0 LOCAL BUSES (#/I.1) : U 0 0 0 HEAVY VEHICLES 2 2 2 2 AP'P'ROACH GRADE Q 0 0 0 DAM AREA TYPE: NON--BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTROL DATA MIN. THRU GREEN (SEC): 0 0 i.? C) MIN. LEFT GREEN (SEC): 0 o s-) U APPROACH SPEED (MPH) : 25 25 25 25 SNEAKERS (XIO/CYCLE) : 20 2C) 20 2t? C) LANE WIDTH #1 (FT)-. 12 12 1.2 LANE WIDTH #2 (FT) : 12 12 1:' C? LANE WIDTH (FT): 12 12 12 C? LANE WIDTH #4 (FT) : i~ 0 C) i) LANE WIDTH #5 (FT)- C? C) 0 LANE WIDTH #6 (FT): 0 C? 0 0 CONTROLLER TYPE: N/S ACTUATED, E/W = ACTUATED OP'P'OSING VOLUME COMPOSITION: -fHI=:LJ RIGHT MOVEMENT (S) , EAST-WEST PHASING: NEITHER TURN PROTECTED NORTI+-SOUTH PHASING: NB LEFT PROTECTED APPROACH GROUT' DESCRIPTION 1 TURN DESCRIPTION! 1 LEFTS ONLY 1 LEFT: EXCLUSIVE, PROT. NORTHBOUND THRUS ONLY 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE 1 LEFT: NOT AP'P'L I CABLE SOUTHBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY RIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM. 1 LEFT; PEI). FRICTION! ONLY EASTBOUND 2 THRUS ONLY FIGHTS ONLY 1 RIGHT: EXCLUSIVE, PERM, ; 1 LEFT: NOT APPLICABLE i WESTBOUND 2 ALL MOVEMENTS 1 RIGHT: NOT APPLICABLE i i i S. I . C. A. P. - VERSION - - 2/89 DATE: 02-19-1992 (PAGE 2 OF 2) LOCATION: BULL MTN AT PACIFIC HWY PERIOD: PM/TT (P'ROP'OSED) 1 a DEMAND/SUPPLY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST TABLE GP#1-1 GP#2 GP# GP#9. GP#2 GP#3 GP#1 GF'*1;2 GP##3 GP#1 GP#2 GP#3 VOLUME ; 103. 1253 i) 1881 4£34 ) 260 96 i ► c_) Cy SAT. FLOW: 169 3565 r ) c.) 3%565 1515 f) 3030 1515 c_) 0 ( ) FLOW RATIO; 0.06 0.35 0. 00 0.00 0.53 0.32 0„ 0c_? 0. C)9 0.06 0.00 0.00 Q. 00 CAPACITY: 138 2920 0 0 2511 1067 0 347 173 0 1) 0 VOL./CAP.: 0.75 0.43 0. Sic:) o.00 0.75 0.45 0. C)(-? ().'75 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 GREEN TIME/MOVEMENT (SEC) AVAILABLE: 1C). 76.7 0. i) 0.0 66.4 66.4 0. 0 1._t., 13.3 0. 0 c_). C) 0. 0 REQUIRED.- 9.1 36.7 0.0 0.0 52. 9 29.3 0.0 10.6 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS DELAY (SEC) : 44 1 i) 0 6 4 i) i) 26 0 0 i QUEUE (FT): 72 91 0 0 269 108 0 81 55 0 c~ 0 STOPS 85 7 0 0 39 29 0 76 73 c:) 0 PHASE OPERATION (SEC) ) NB THRU & LEFT 10.3• 11.5 LOST TIME/PHASE: =.0 SEC N8 & SB THRU 66.4 73.8 TOTAL. LOST TIME: 9.0 SEC EB WB GREEN 13.3 14.8 CYCLE LENGTH: 90.0 SEC: IML ALL RED TIME: 0.o SEC FLOW RATIO: 0. 67 DEGREE OF SAT.: 0.75 LEFT TURN CHECt: ND S1' EID WE, VOLUME: 10 PROTECTION (PROT/PERM): PROT PERMITTED CAPACITY: PROTECTED CAPACITY: 138 EXCESS LEFT TURNS: 0 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF DELAY DELAY FUEL STOPPED COST AP'P'ROACH SERVICE (SEC) (HRS) (GAL.) VEHICLES NORTHBOUND A 4.7 0-6 0.6 4-3 3 SOUTHBOUND B 5.6 1.2 1 22c_) 10 EASTBOUND D 29.7 C). 9 1 . c:? 67 5 WESTBOUND A 0.C-) o . . c.) INTERSECTION -B --7.:' 2.•7 --3.7 -329 is (UNIT VALUES: $ '.00 $ i.i)c) $ v. 02) i i ! f i MIZE ERE= Il I i I. I. I I. I I APPENDIX H Site Layout r I' I a • ! t ~ I;~ ` ~I C'1 l~ ~ r ~ III, ' ~ ~ L'. r;hl'id~~ /~:..II:~ I. i. '7 it t[ `I "'fir `w~ ~ i'~r ~ ,I ' J A i...t 'rl' r, } rye'/ ' 1 _ ~ ~ _ ~W' ~ ,al 1J11114i ' ' ~ I r~ III. yet ~ I, r ( lil-' VI , ~ t i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I~II~IkI I~ (i I't t' ~ ~1 I 11 F , 4':.:ix i I ~ ,~.q ~il' ~1ii r {~•II` ~ I ~i ~Y , ~ (rl~l I lr ~ I r _f ' ~ilrtt,~(kll z ' :i y I _t _ i ..y b-- ; ! n`~ t . ~ n 9 7~, , ~ i I 1''•`l~yr`'.±,~~~~~,~t't'~'~It ' ( • -!ti ^ ~ C~ I , , t ~I r ;l~lh! I ~ If tl~ ~MA C.I d ~ I ~ ilrt Ur' fltl rrNm l:Fd :li, ~ , R 7 R'7 ► Y Iii ! _ _ r ~ i{ ~ ~ III ~ ! ~ 1"~ r ?d. ~ ~ i t I Ili p I II ► +at>~~ ,•r , ~ (I I I Ilil~nlll`1 ~ I~~'Y„' I . I I (~fl~klr~ - _.ti, C.. . - • s ,i.?F1 .'r r ~ ~~.I 'MI I Cv~ ill I~ \ 111 ,I,~~h'I I . YI1, 1) ~ I. ;I --T, yl~,'+I, ~ ~f 1 tl t f~l I S ~ a,r~ t,, I, , ~ (1111 I. - P I , ...g 4 Gr'l~w Il,...ulli'~ 1`41 :!i<lilil] `W iluiug .~ti'IL, 1 r ~.....I„N.~.~.~ ;.',sy n i e I a, t ! , , Ilr ~u, l k~ ,`k B I y~~jy~~y N~ t I a II!l,tJ1 I I ~ IIJ E' ~ I ~ ~-t." `1 - r '~-A gt~~ ~ ~ ''i' ~ ~1y'4~., 1:'f~~t.= W ~:.i' ~[j 1 { ~ _I I I \~yY' ' IIII~IPI I~~a ~~r ~~iV~rl] ~i ILId:4~• l' ~ ~ ~ +h''~ ' - i~~` ~ I x't~'' ' ~ ~ ~ ~;,~I~ ~ ~ ~ II"' 'j r 1~l•; 1(tllll~~~l'I'tf~~(~ ~ 'Y' JP~ 'al W. . t ~ ~ .....Itilr ! y=`.R \ .;~T~. \3 R t ,+;:181w..1' ' ~~I!I,7 Illy 'i ! ,y'~:r ,II `t Illil~ ~a ~ r 1~ y., - ,kJ' ~ ".I5 '11. I,. ! f' ~It 1 r I~, II ~!n ~ L} I i. ~ - I, r - I !I iir y :V.,~~`. -i~ b t ,r I ~".Ij< °i I hi i! ~V"V~VI, "jl , i ~ ~t l I: 't ~ ~~~,~i~: ~ ,r'I ' X71 ~ - ..1.. _ _ -1_ i ~ ~ ~ t ,.,j ;f'. p~ ~ ~t ~ I «'~~l ~~"t ~i II ~'~t~ ~ 7~~ ~i~~! ~(y(~~ ~ ~~~~,,tt~'~~' t, ~~j _ - ~.i 2 I,' ~ 1... ''o. t ' wE~~. , .iN.', ~ q ~ , I ~ tl y1 1 I~If I , lyV'~ E1: ~ Al { ~j a,.;'„7, ~ -1~-. ..:.~i ~ 'a ,~7,.~ Itl~ Ii";I ~ r: I- A,'~y~'~ 'il+allt I'' ~~d (~1 T" ~ ~ r 4 r . I I , I. 1Iiq.I' • 't"..~ ~ r I", : , ~ \\~•`11 r,'... ~ rv~ A.#a ~~~h` p.t tt` y~ If~~l'y 4n ~l~~l,'yl .A9'q ~ ~ I \~\~;111;~~ ~ / _1~~~^. i ~ ,3 ~~~~~i~ I'•I°~>i41.. ,.[t ).llty; •4 I 1 41' .~'r I t Y I _ h n] _ _ I f 1 \ yy ~ 'I I . _ I - , ~ I, , , , I ,~l riI T~~J_ L I ~7. 4r~ 1 . &d; I ' a~ ~i.~l... r" 1 ~ ~ ~,m'9i l~ ]li~l ' ~ ' ` ~ ! y „ J ! p _ ~ :;y, t: N o ( ?'T ~ ~isr,,~ ',r.y Ht:. !tu ~ I .S1tr ' Irr I _ _Ur 4• (Il ca: , - ~ I a~., ! ~y iw I • Yw, Illn ' ~ I '•"••~~"A`'c~,. ~ .t• •~rr- ~ ~!~.'1 fill °;'IS 7,~ It I I ( ' . : ~ 1. ~ ~ I I i a, ~ ~-1V._ ~o+ ~ 1 ~h51 ~~~1i'~'17' '~f ~o bt ~I~ ~I)~,~t,.~ r Ir.~*' 't ~~...t~ Ij _lak. I~, I I L~, . ~ ` i 7 ; ~ . : _ r ...l ! ]t J ,u,.y ~I I- c ~ i L!" e IL w ~ ~.a~°~;t t~ ~ i~.}~, i M~* r~~rWro"r~ 1 I K '°J ` t ~s , i' `111 ' - i'`_ Vo 1 ~t ci•; fi I .t^*~' a~ "i: ~ ~~Y♦~yk ~ ~ i ~ ~ "y i,,, ~ ~~t1~41hpI 1 114,':i~. I I V t- ! tl, ~ 4`ti,'#k~". 4~'~, Nnu!.r I ! ~ 1 ~ I r ; !.~,I I 4 t ~ .I-- - 1 ~ , ;~W ~ r_ r,~ s ~ ~ ~ '~"f E ~ I ' 4 I ~ ' '~irf,'; li I I I.i~~ i~!, ~a -i `'~~~~4~r L•,:- r `_y' ~+a~ ~ j I i ~ I .S~J !'i ~ Ili 1l ~`I ' v E.+a..~_~u_~-i tv'~~- ~ - ~ i ~ ~ ~=1..1`. _ y . ; V~►~ . ',,,t•..w~. ; " .r n r , • I r 1 l t t I -rte ~~=iV'' ~ ('-t I,. g~ a t^- ,.,r'~"+, ~"id'~~ :.u. ,I/~, ,II~ ' p~ ,I I~ ,n ..I ! yy~~~ ~ d',' 71 i ~I,i~,l' } 'r ,-!utl ~lti,.(~ ~ ~.~~y ',.l- lW ,t •t."fI~J tI. ' -.ice. Mp•q r.1i11 t~ .T ,r: :I I r~ _ I I ,r; 1 :P C,... .x r ~ ~ I ~ ~ - ~ L 7~ ~ ~ _ C r~i~ r , I n r ~ I~';.' I ~ 1~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ r ~ I '1 ` ~ I~!y' 11111: ~ ~ E \ : i ~ • ~<lIIf6L'^^-~~ ~ ; 1. ~r ~p ~ i.,_ 'h I ` t I M, ~ 1 I Ilil r5' ~ I~ 1 I a ~ § I't=9Li~ '^.5 .r'~ ~ -~ir, ~ ~ ~ ~ F - , ~i t.s ~rl! i ~ J 0 % iI 1I I ~ I I~'. Ei -C 1 t ~y!ZJ~ ~~f:.'S+II -~~:~y+ 7 t Iw'~l_M .;rl t~~~~ I 1" I~ I ,lll ..+!r wla\ IW I'{ I 1I 6tl'II ~ ~1~ ;4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ ~1 1r~. I ~~1. I II r\\\1..11 I~ ,11 , 111111 I I•fi ~ ~ 'L~~ ~ ~`s ti M~ I ~ ,%i: li ~ ~ \l dot 1 1! 1'1 ~ N a :y;.~ ~ A I::.1~` !y rx}+ L ..«fir.l 1y' '1~I~ ! ))~'f @.@ '~~1 ~~til~~l~`4'~ ~I~, I r Ic ~ ~ i ~ M'. ..4(-1. ~ F , ~ ~ i I v,~, t}.~.1 ; 7~ It !1 I,"\tl J II)p .I Ii J~1~4\l.. I I 1 ~ y ~ ~ I~ KF~+ = •Y,k: F ' •a 1 r~ I I~~~r~ 1~ I~/',. ~ I t tful 1~~~ Ilt, ~l~ II. II ~'I I - Z F ~ , I f I ~1 _ ~ %'E'' •~r.+' ~I i ,ii I ~~d~~ Il.i, \ \ III It`~~~~ ( ~,~el~~li, - ~ ~ Iro ~ ,I IIIliltll; , ,11 ~,I \~II . ~ I a-- ~ (ti4~ ,L. ,rn l i! b _ - '4f!~1, awy, 1 t `A ~r I '~IF'LI! I I~I. i bh I V ~ ~ ~ - I `Ilt~ll~'':~II~~ r~~ II~~l 'I!;~I~' I~ ~~'~L1~1~~ 11i'. ~~I~. (Ilt~whlit- I~I ~,~I V ~ - r~ M+~ 1) ijll~ jl. I r I ~I III M1I~ il- ILJI~~ txl ~,~I _ v - ~ ~,'t~ i ~ ;~!I, I „ , II i I{{ , I+, ft~ I I , r i,1 n l li I'. -t, ~C = G_F- "'r i~ -?•r+lv~n Itji 'j ,I lui111111 Bill I '~I.~ I ~H~'~~f lli II II A ~I'\ :VIII III I ~ 1-- ~~I ~~W~r _~Ii~l~ a .T ~ ~ 11 _ i ,w„~..~,,...1 ,~Mr~'~ J I, I ! , I L, .I ,I ' l l , .4~ i I ~ a..{• I I ~ '7 'N~ a ~ - ~ ~ ' I ~ i~ I, ~ ~ I -ll I~ 1111 ~ I'~ `1J L~~ l l ~ ~ 1 V.~,~ I - 1 ~ ~ ! I ~w.Y+x l u SIiIL,. ,I- ~~S~~I1~ II ~~II '~II~~,i~~,l i I~~I I~~.JI~. ~I ~ l~ll~ls I 1 ~:er~a _ L L _ ~ N t'!~ f dr .i I t: ,rt ~ n ~ .k ill. I~ ~I1. , j ~ j'II, ,il ! ~I, 'II Ir'Itj I II '~ll~~ I I,.17~ i •;.r. a ' , ~ I I ~ ~ i i; ~I ( - .y .y ~ t-II I~i q„' C , ~I I 1; ( ll II 1~ ~~~III I ~~~L~~"~,~"• ~ ~ _ I ; • r , . ~ _ I~ I ~i:1..li:_ ~ I ' )~~I 1e ! Ilii iiGli I ,~`~l~~h~~r~l Il~\IhY ~I~I I I ~ ~ .=r"1 ~j_.u, . .,u i~ a It II n{; til~lt~;l, I ~Ir ~M~I1' ~ ,I I `d'III l~~e t 1 f '~GI/~ I """"1h1h w ~ ~ F,-- -~a-.~- ~ `.r Ir _ rr ;I I i. ~ ~r.t~l6ulIII : lil I! ~~I\I III 1~ 'I~ I ~I ii I r I' ~ ~i ~b i~ ~ _l/ I 't^ r` p~ <t,'; I' iI r~ trI ` I, 1' rlrl.'~ PII~~ I I Ir,~ `11~11~h~~ h(~,I~ I i ~ I ~r~ ,r! ~ < 1► + I~~~`j~ If ir~ i~~ . ~ I ~ , , ~r~1 i! p~l,ul_ ~j. I ~ ~ i' 7 1,-_ ,li :~!M, ~1~f ~ ._I A~~!{'t',~ I! fl'{,'~°I ~ ~I i~. : I It 1. II I I i,.i t Z ~ : ~ I I , / y, t,r ,•r C) ~ t • ~ i; e a IL. ~ ~ ~I.ju;rn~ ~ t' Iw: . p I 'r`~.' : 9, i N.w \ I , 1 I ~+v l 1 ` l l ~w ~ I t ~j I iI III u i ~q 11 y / ••.n ~r ~ r r r 11 ~.T' C.. ~n yl. f~~ ...~,~,.#.~~u ~~i{I'.'~~lai-~I~C.~ 4t1: !f~~!1~ 1~ MII"~T ~~'I~:.~~ ~ !'I 3~1; 11.11~fi I ,I !I'!~ { ~I j I ~ II r. ♦ ~ ~ f ~ 1 t ;T y .']:v I I t~ rh` ~ II r iI , :1 7~ , I - ! ~ 11 1 I Iii _ 1 j. r'• C~ `~`a; ; ~ ~ 4_ I I" J'~: ~ I, ~ 1 i ~I i ~ I ~ ~ ( ~ ~ I,, ~~I i, I~ ~I II I I I I ~ S v ,i__~'j ~ _ 1~ t ~ 71 I i ikt" "4~ ~ Lr ~i; n'I ''~~Ilrla' 'I~ uI II IL, ,y I ' ~~..J'➢"Wi-+~ ,w..lrw~!!.w!w r~F w~„~Mr.pIMIAb• w I M'~ . /r 1'° R5 1, # I I ``r.-` ~ I-I~ ~ T'Cr~ r:,l ,~f .•js...-,.- •'j ~ ~ F~I ~ , ~ !,.yy , r I Ilt tll'~,I ) r l> I~ I ~ 1~ 7 , 11';i'jr~la I ~ I k~~ i _-L.i "-(i~~ tr{( N .c: i, 1. Id` ~,1~~ ~ I~ I , {t: r ' ' 1~~IiI~' (b I~I "t~X s .?-,1= I T. "'.GTIaL l,''~%/~~• 4dw4' t. 'Z. 1 WI ~ xb., ,w „1{I. ti:I,~I~ ~,i ~ II `.I h,,I~I!II rill I!: `t ~~~i' •~~(~I II`` - - ~i~l..lt~<~Yi~~ t ~ ~ ~ ►:~L~.., r. ~ j ~ I :;~"~~!.y~'I~~ llli~~l ~ I` II~'`1~P~~1\Vr!~~ ,~h 77 ~I ~ ~~.~r~F. ~ , ~ r I~ rl I 'P i : }I ,lHll il:lrll I,I':I , , II ~ I~ i7-l~tfy""'` ~~i~ ~ ~ ~.r.-yW1:e' t. tl~~ ~I' - ~ar~r+,ik rt!'- I ~ :r' i' .i VIII, r ~:I~ IIII~, i ~y'' ~ p'rfI 11 i ~ I ' r ..►.~.T"!-I ~ 4-~I( ~ ,A. I bC:'1.^t:~;~.y I t ~ ~ iPt ~ i'tt. ~ ~4-: .I:I ' I,f!1 x ! f II ' I~ ` ~ I' ~ ~~I ~,i ~I f r ~ 'I' t ~ n 1 Il '~q~ 1 L, ~ ! f 4 ~ I ~~1~`,~~ ! ~ 11I~, ~ ~ I ; I I , el, I ~ ~1 I ~ Q ~ 7~'/~l~ .I,._ ~ Ni I ~.5 fk1 AI~~gA, tl ii'Il~l. ~ ~I ~ !.1 I ~~~,~J~ 1" Lt c° r7i1 ~',.~1. ~ ~ Ji s..+ir<~. ~ ,t: ,:,t, I; i'~Isl! i 111 ~4 r , 1~\,, 1',~~.~IIN!I !ilil !I~r I ~-f]+i II~ I f. n tl I' ..4.tl.f j1 ~ ; w«I.'~ , I~ I I 1. r.~lli - - b O y • £ ? F7 ~ ~ 7n Ml 41 A7 ~1 ik ~ IF ~ ~ ~ U ~ ' it t7 ~'+ft~ < (W~ y N ,74 )0 ~ di 1u 1~ 1, Y ~ 4 u: O w m p ~ ~ w ~ ~ \I a: i wl ii. ir, ~ 1~`~ 1 I ~ ao IO~vao . ~ ~ ! ~ j y p N r ~ t~ ~ I .j r I ~ - U1 J Q1 ~ 1~ ~y 6 s ~~~111 s~ ' ~ I t:. ~ tf~t ~ ~ ~ 7f n c~ W , f7r ~ ~ 1~ k ~ I•; rfi ' ~ m ~ ~ to ;I I ~ ~ ~ ~ m p w w m ; I ~ ~ m cp J O !yw. I MAY- 1 2- 9 "1-UE 1 S : S9 C0MRASS EE FiC MS P _ 02 ^po: PLANNING p Mf- e%r%l 1 r%r CT e-% I r. INC. LAND USE ~ SITE PLANNING SERVICES !`JXay 12,1992 Mr. Jerry Offer City of tijard P4anning bepartment 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE:. CPA, 92•®Qfl2 Hear Jeremy: This letter is to confirm our discussions of this date regarding the City Council hearing on, the above-referenced Comprehensive Flan Amendment application. As we discussed, my cljent is regiiesting a one month continuance to permit time to meet with the neighbors in the area to attempt to address some of the concerns voiced at the Planning Commission hearing and to consider alternatives to the land use designation we have proposed in our current application. If we are able to come to an agreement with the neighbors regarding use of this land, we may wish to withdraw the present application and submit a revised proposal. We believe that this one month continuance is in the best interests of the applicant and the'neighbars in the area and:ask that the Council grant this request. I will be available at the hearing tonight to address any questions that the City Council may have regarding this letter. Sincerely yours, Richard Givens cc: Phyllis Anderson ASM S F. I ako A ari a *~:i.....,:.:.. n..... m7nnn _