City Council Packet - 03/12/1991
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BUSINESS MEETING
MARCH 12, 1991 6:30 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE. Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER should sign on the appropr/ate sign-up sheet(s). if no sheet Is
13125 SW HALL BLVD available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning
TIGARD, OREGON 972,23 of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be
two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future
Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City
Administrator.
• STUDY SESSION (6:30 P.M.)
1. BUSINESS MEETING (7:30 p.m.)
1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK (APRIL 1-7, 19911
• Mayor Edwards
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one
motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion
for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
4.1 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar
b. Report on Status of Park Levy Improvements
4.2 Approve Final Order: SUB 90-0010 Castile/McMonagle - Resolution No. 91-
4.3 Approve Board & Committee
a. Appointments - Resolution No. 91--
b. Reappointments - Resolution 91 -
4.4 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement with State of Oregon Department of Transportation
for Improvement of Scholis Ferry Road - Resolution No. 91-_F
4.5 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement with State of Oregon Department of Transportation
to Accept Funding for 97th Avenue Bikeway - Resolution No. 91-
4.6 Authorize Right-of-Way Acquisition for Bonita Road Transportation Safety Improvement
Project - Resolution No. 91--'L
4.7 Approve Agreement with Washington County to Accept Community Development Block
Grant Funds - Pathways Near Metzger School; Authorize Mayor to Sign
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 1
5. CONTINUATION OF COUNCIL DELIBERATION ON APPEAL OF SCE 90-0005, VARIANCE
VAR-0027 SHERWOOD INN SIGN (NPO 5)
A request for Sign Code Exception and Variance approval to allow two freestanding freeway-
oriented signs where only one is permitted. Also requested is approval to retain one sign of
approximately 1,180 square feet per sign face with a height of approximately 65 feet and one
sign of approximately 698 square feet per sign face with a height of approximately 69.75 feet
where the code specifies a maximum allowable sign area of 160 square feet per sign face and
maximum allowable height of 35 feet. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 15700
SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 12DD, Tax Lots 100, 900, 1100)
• Continuation of Council Deliberation from January 22, 1991
• Summation by Community Development Staff
• Recommendation by Community Development Staff
• Council Questions or Comments
• Consideration by Council
6. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 90-0004
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
• Open Public Hearing
• Summation by Community Development Staff
• NPO and/or CPO Testimony
• Public Testimony
- Proponents
- Opponents
• Recommendation by Community Development Staff
• Council Questions or Comments
• Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council - Ordinance No. 91-
7. SECOND READING: ORDINANCE NO. 91-03
An Ordinance approving an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map
by repealing Ordinance No. 89-24 with the exception of the portion of Ash Avenue between Hall
Boulevard at Hunziker Street and Commercial Street and adding a connection from southbound
Highway 99W to Main Street (CPA 90-0010) requested by the City of Tigard.
8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the
provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property
transactions, current and pending litigation issues.
10. ADJOURNMENT
cca312.91
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 2
r
r Council Agenda Item urj
1 T I G A RD C I T Y C O U N C I L
MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991
• Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Edwards.
1. ROLL CALL
Council Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Carolyn
Eadon, Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten and John Schwartz (arrived
at 6:45 p.m.) Staff Present: Ron Bunch, Senior Planner; Ken
Elliott, Legal Counsel; Ed Murphy, Community Development
Director; Liz Newton, Community Relations Coordinator; Patrick
Reilly, City Administrator; Catherine Wheatley, City
Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer.
STUDY SESSION
Historical Site and District Committee
The City has received requests for historical site review for
several buildings in Tigard. The Historical Site and District
Committee, inactive for some time, must be reinstated to review the
i requests. Councilor Eadon consented to serve and represent Council
on this Committee.
Main Street Bridge
City Engineer updated council on options for reconstruction of the
Main Street Bridge. He advised the project would take
approximately three to four months. Downtown business owners have
reviewed the options and strongly favored keeping the traffic route
open during construction.
Options included:
Cost with traffic Cost with traffic
route closed route open
44-foot wide bridge $ 294,000 $ 334,000
54-foot wide bridge 304,000 314,000
Council consensus was to construct the 54-foot wide bridge and to
keep the traffic route open. Council agreed it was very important
and in the best interest for downtown business owners to keep the
traffic lanes open during construction.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 1
Improvements to a Portion of S.W. 79th Avenue
City Engineer advised that increased development activity was
occurring on S.W. 79th Avenue (between Bonita and Durham Roads).
Waivers of remonstrance for street improvement costs have been
signed by residents living along a portion of 79th.
Council discussed methods of financing: formation of a local
improvement district or setting up advance financing with
reimbursement to the City from new residential development as it
occurs.
Council noted several issues which need to be resolved, including:
• Who should pay for the road,
• How much of the road should be improved, and
• What was desired by the people who lived in the
neighborhood.
Council consensus was to refer this issue to the NPO and
Transportation Advisory Committee to study and solicit public
input. Staff will keep Council apprised.
Budget Committee
City Administrator advised that Bill Scheiderich recently moved out
of Tigard and was, therefore, ineligible to serve on the Budget
Committee. Mr. Scheiderich submitted his resignation last week.
Appointment of a new member should be done as soon as possible.
Agenda Review
• Appeal of SCE 90-0005, Variance VAR-0027 Sherwood Inn Sign
(NPO 5)
The applicant has requested a set over of this hearing item
for approximately 30 days. Council consensus was to
reschedule their deliberation of the issue to April 9, 1991.
• Public Hearing - Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 90-0004
Landscaping and Screening
Council reviewed the proposed ordinance. Staff noted areas
where changes were made. There was discussion on buffering
requirements between commercial and residential zones. Staff
advised that buffering would be required by new commercial
development abutting residential areas; however, residential
developers would not be required to provide buffering.
i
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 2
MINE
BUSINESS MEETING
2. PROCLAMATION
i
Mayor Edwards proclaimed April 1 - 7 as National Community
Development Week. (APRIL 1-7, 1991).
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA
• Charlene Kalupa of 88th/Stratford Loop told Council of a
newly formed Neighborhood Watch Committee in her
neighborhood. She reported they had excellent
participation and advised they had been talking to
officer Peterson and Lt. Martin of the Police Department.
The major issue for the neighbors is high school student
parking on residential streets and resultant loitering
and littering problems. Permit parking (tow away zone)
was offered as a possible solution by the Neighborhood
Watch group.
Mayor Edwards thanked Ms. Kalupa for advising Council of
their concern and possible solution. He told her that
Council recently met with the School Board and this issue
was discussed. The City and School District are working
to alleviate the parking problems.
City Administrator advised that a neighborhood meeting
would be held before the end of the school year.
Compromise solutions would be studied and implemented by
the start of the new school year next fall.
4. CONSENT AGENDA: The following Consent Agenda items were
approved by Council:
4.1 Receive and File:
a. Council Calendar
b. Report on Status of Park Levy Improvements
4.2 Approve Final Order: SUB 90-0010 Castile/McMonagle -
Resolution No. 91-05
4.3 Approve Board & Committee
a. Appointments - Resolution No. 91-06
b. Reappointments - Resolution 91 -0-i-
4.4 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement with State of Oregon
Department of Transportation for Improvement of Scholls
Ferry Road - Resolution No. 91-08
4.5 Approve Intergovernmental Agreement with State of Oregon
Department of Transportation to Accept Funding for 97th
Avenue Bikeway - Resolution No. 91-09
4.6 Authorize Right-of-Way Acquisition for Bonita Road
Transportation Safety Improvement Project -Resolution No.
91-10
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 3
'sF
Note: Item 4.7 was removed from the Consent Aaenda;
agreements have not been received.
[4.7 Approve Agreement with Washington County to Accept
Community Development Block Grant Funds - Pathways Near
Metzger School; Authorize Mayor to Sign]
Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to
approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
The Council approved the Consent Agenda by a unanimous vote of
Council present.
Mayor Edwards introduced the following newly appointed Committee
members: Mike Meinecke, appointed to the Utility and Franchise
Committee; Wanda Githens, appointed to NPO 1; and Lila Garner,
appointed to NPO 3. Mayor and Council welcomed the new Committee
members.
5. CONTINUATION OF COUNCIL DELIBERATION ON APPEAL OF SCE 90-0005
VARTANCE VAR-0027 SHERWOOD INN SIGN (NPO 5)
A request for Sign Code Exception and Variance approval to
allow two freestanding freeway-oriented signs where only one
is permitted. Also requested is approval to retain one sign
of approximately 1,180 square feet per sign face with a height
of approximately 65 feet and one sign of approximately 698
square feet per sign face with a height of approximately 69.75
feet where the code specifies a maximum allowable sign area of
160 square feet per sign face and maximum allowable height of
35 feet. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 15700 SW
Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 12DD, Tax Lots 100, 900,
1100)
This item was set over to the April 9, 1991 Council meeting.
6. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA
90-0004 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
a. Public hearing was opened.
b. There were no declarations or challenges.
C. Staff reviewed the report submitted to Council and
outlined provisions of the proposed ordinance. The
revisions are intended to:
1. Increase the level of buffering and screening
between different potentially incompatible uses;
2. Add new land use categories that are required to
install buffering and screening; and
3. Provide for more specific standards.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 4
l
These amendments will better protect land uses from each
other and add more clarity to the Code. They will also
increase the cost of development, both because more area
is required to be buffered and screened, and because the
standards for buffering and screening would be raised.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend
adoption for approval with several suggested changes.
Most of changes proposed by the Planning Commission are
minor in nature; however, the commission proposed one
significant departure from the original code amendments.
The Planning Commission suggested that developers of
single family projects not be required to provide
buffering and screening from adjacent zones or uses which
are of a different type.
d. Public hearing was closed.
e. Council Deliberation: Senior Planner Bunch affirmed,
upon request by Councilor Eadon, that residential
property would not be required to provide a buffer if the
residential property were developing next to an
established commercial zone.
f. ORDINANCE NO. 91-04 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
_ BUFFERING AND SCREENING STANDARDS OF TITLE 18 OF THE
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
g. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor
Kasten, to adopt Ordinance No. 91-04.
The motion passed by a majority vote 4-1; Councilor Eadon
voted "Nay." (Ordinance will be read and voted on again
at the March 26, 1991, Council meeting.)
7. SECOND READING: ORDINANCE NO. 91-03
a. ORDINANCE 91-03 - AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP BY
REPEALING ORDINANCE 89-24, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE
PORTION OF ASH AVENUE BETWEEN HALL BOULEVARD AT HUNZIKER
STREET AND COMMERCIAL STREET AND ADDING A CONNECTION FROM
SOUTHBOUND HIGHWAY 99W TO MAIN STREET (CPA 90-0010)
REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD
b. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor
Eadon, to adopt Ordinance No. 91-03.
The motion passed by a majority vote of Council present
(4-1); Councilor Johnson voted "Nay."
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 5
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled.
9. ADJOURNMENT: 7:59 p.m.
Catherine Wheatley, City Rec der
Atte t!': 7
Mayor, City of Tigard
Date :
ccm312.91
t
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 - PAGE 6
I ~
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 68d-0360 Noticew 7899
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 J a l t, sF g f
The -QIIowing meeting highUghts ste published fq your infoimaaoldua
Legal Notice Advertising agendas flay be obtaineai from`;the City Recor`der,13125 S Win
Boulevanl, Tigard, Oregon 97223, or by calling 639?!4i74 ,
P • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 7 k r L 1' s S4 1,3 tt F ~i .
TrrM?
P 1+ U ~1 C~'BUSil\i3JS AVIV&,A
r ~ ~ ~i `-MARCH 121991 ,
• City of Tigard ❑ Duplicate Affidavi : fy~
TI(3ARD:CITY~HALL-=TOWN~HAi L_ -
P.O. Box 23397 `13l25 S W HALL BOULEyARA 'PIGARD O ESN
o Tigard, OR 97223 . z t a - > ; . , l~ ; - 3 z
1' M) ; 't
Study Meeting (Town Hall Confe~eitce Room) (6:30
Business Meehng_(Town Hall) (7 30 P M ' $ r , s
Public Heanngs u~t', r ` d" 7 ~ ~
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Continuation of Counc&6 #beraaon on
PPeal ¢f SGF 90
) ushanae'V ik7SherPiaodlnnSign (INFO 5j t'
STATE OF OREGON, A'K
ss. o.s { r{ rT
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) r ° `r
• Conanuaaon b "..Public Hearin Gone Orchiiai~ce Amen abR
i Judith Koehler ZOA90W LandscapLnggS%eeentng'" ' } 4
being first duly sworn, depose and say th l am t dvertising :.s~
Director, or his principal clerk, of the ll~ar es Second Reading ofOrdinance Nci 14-0; An OidanCe,~pv
a newspaper of general circulatign as defined in ORS 193.010 amen8menit¢;fhb'fxgardComplehensivekl~i8tt $slaotfaaan
and 193.020; published at igard in the repeal ng Qrdinance N~ 89 ?~4;~v It thgxce~llo~i~bfwl;e~omou~al '
afo Qsaid ounty, nci ste~te; that the
Ash Avenue4bcta+een Hall Boulevazd at Hunuker;SaeetiiaCommet
~ity G~ounci~ Business Meeting cial Sit and addtng a ponnecaonFfrom southpound; Xi 1~ ay 99 o~}r
3
t
~ t rg z , ~ ~ ~ m.a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the F;$ ,yst,(I~d)T?~dbj~ tyOn
entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and Local C fact teyiewBoam M ang ~ eft
consecutive in the following issues:
Executive Session The Tigardt~y Cotu~~l=+illmtp,Exee~.fave
Sesstpn under fie provisions ofi I92~ 1
March 7 1991
cuss lr relations, real pm aons~ai d curretitalgdpendl
ng li 'gaaon"
T77$99 Publish Man;h 7'1991r '
Subscribed and swor o before me this 7th day of March 1991
Notary Public for Oregon
s xpires:
My Commis
AFFIDAVIT
OF TIGAM, OR0GON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss
City of Tigard )
begin first duly sworn, on
oath, depos and say:
That T posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of
ordinance Number (s) 9 I - 5
which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated GL7._
copy(s) of said ordinance(s) be' hereto attached and by reference made a part
hereof, on the J%j date of 1994.
1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
2. , Corner of Main and Tigard, Oregon
3. Sa€eway-4t,~',y"Tigard Plaza, SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. ( State Hwy. 99) and
SW Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon
c1 y
,quix;cribed and sworn to before me this :;7 date of G>- , 19 y~
_ _ ~ tary PublkLtbr- o
My Commission Expires:
ke/GWPOST
Foos { z
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 91-03
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP
BY REPEALING ORDINANCE 89-24 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PORTION OF ASH AVENUE BETWEEN
HALL BOULEVARD AT HUNZIKER STREET AND COMMERCIAL STREET AND ADDING A CONNECTION FROM
SOUTHBOUND HIGHWAY 99W TO MAIN STREET (CPA 90-0010) REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD.
WHEREAS, the request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map as follows:
1)Retain the Ash Avenue connection between Hall Boulevard at Hunziker Street and
Commercial Street.
2) Delete the Ash Avenue connection between Commercial Street and Highway 99W at
Walnut Street.
3) Re-establish the Ash Avenue connection between Burnham Street and Hill Street.
4) The re-alignment of Burnham Street to connect with Main Street opposite Tigard
Street would be deleted.
5) Add a connection from southbound Highway 99W to Main Street.
WHEREAS, NPO #1 & 2 discussed the CPA 90-0010 proposal (subsequently amended at the
February 19, 1991 City Council meeting) at its regular meeting on
November 14, 1990 and recommends approval; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard the CPA 90-0010 proposal (subsequently amended
at the February 19, 1991 City Council meeting) at its regular meeting on December 4,
1990 and recommends approval with more general language for the Highway 99W connection; 5
and
WHEREAS, the City Council took public testimony on the CPA 90-0010 proposal on
February 19, 1991
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as noted below:
The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 12, and City of
Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1:1 a., 2.1.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 11.2.1, 11.2.2,
11.2.3 and applicable Community Development Code sections related to legislative plan
amendments.
The proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Goals based on
the following findings: %
1. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, is met because the City has an
adopted citizen involvement program which includes review of land
use applications by neighborhood planning organizations. In
addition, this proposal has been reviewed in public hearings by
the Planning Commission and by the City Council for which the
public has been properly notified. Moreover, this issue was
brought before the public at a public workshop held by the City
Council and at a public hearing on August 27, 1990 at which time
a decision was made to initiate the Comprehensive Transportation
C Plan Map amendments.
ORDINANCE No. 91-L'!3
Page 1
2. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, is met because the City has applied
all relevant Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan
policies, and Community Development Code requirements in the
review of this proposal.
3. Goal 12, Transportation, is met because the City has adopted
policies related to improving the transportation network and
continuing coordination of transportation improvements with other
involved agencies.
The proposal is consistent with the City's acknowledged Comprehensive
Plan based on the following findings:
1. Policy 1.1.1 a. is satisfied because the proposed amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan will not affect compliance of the City's
acknowledged Plan with the Statewide Goals.
2. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because Neighborhood Planning
organization #1 has been notified of the hearing and has
commented on the proposal and surrounding property owners have
been notified of the date, time and place of the hearing.
3. Policy 8.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map plan for a safe and
efficient street and roadway system that meets current and future
needs.
4. Policy 8.1.2 is satisfied because the City is working jointly
with the Oregon Department of Transportation to promote a
cooperative solution to improving access to the Central Business
District from Highway 99W.
5. Policies 11.2.2, 11.2.2 and 11.2.3 are satisfied because the
proposed Ash Avenue extension alignment west from Burnham Street
re-establishes the alignment for which these policies were
established. There have been no change in circumstances that
would invalidate the compatibility of the proposed alignment with
these policies.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby repeals ordinance 89-24 (Exhibit "A") with the
exception of the portion of Ash Avenue between Hall Boulevard at
Hunziker Street and Commercial Street thus deleting from the
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map the expanded Ash Avenue extension
between the Walnut Street/Pacific Highway intersection and commercial
Street, and deleting the re-alignment of Burnham Street to connect with
Tigard Street at Main Street, and removing direction to proceed with a
specific alignment analysis for Ash Avenue.
SECTION 3: The City Council hereby re-establishes on the Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Map the Ash Avenue extension as it was prior to adoption
of ordinance 89-24 and adds reference to a connection from southbound
Highway 99W to Main Street as shown in Exhibit "B".
l
ORDINANCE No. 91- 03
Page 2
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the
Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder.
PASSED: By ,Y;~!a *l r!-4 vote of all council members present after being
read by number and title only, this )a)"k day of -M"c-tx- ,
1991.
Gc.~ tt~
Catherine Wheatley, City Recor r
~h
0
APPROVED: This day of CL' 1
Gera I R. dwards, Mayor
Approv as to form:
, 41~jkg
C ty Attorney
I e & a-,4A-
D to
C
ORDINANCE No. 91-
Page 3
h~
I E3 rr
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 89-~X
A ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THEE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP (CPA 89-06 ASH AVENUE AND BURNHAM/TIGARD
REALIGNMENT) REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD.
WHEREAS, the request was to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation map as
follows: (1) The Ash Avenue connection to be modified to indicate a connection
between the intersection of SW Walnut and Pacific Highway to the intersection
of Hunziker Street and Hall Boulevard. (2) The alignment of SW Burnham to be
modified to intersect to SW Main Street opposite SW Tigard. The realigned
portion will replace the existing portion of Burnham as the collector route;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard the above application at its regular
meeting of June 20, 1989 and recommended. approval; and,
WHEREAS, the City council took public testimony on the above application at its
regular meetings of July 10, 1989 and August 21, 1989.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The•proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as noted
below:
1. Location
ASH AVFJM EXTENSION - between SW Pacific Highway at Walnut and Hail at-
Hunziker. (WCTM 2S1 2BD, 2S1 2AC, 2S1, 2CA, 2S1 2DB, 2S1 2AD & 2S1 2AA.)
BURNHAM/TIGARD REALIGNMENT - between SW Main street at Tigard and the
existing right--of-way of SW Burnham. (WCTM 2S1 2AB & 2S1 2AD.)
2. Background Information
On May 9, 1983, the City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan
Transportation map by approving Ordinance 83-24. Subsequent to the original.
adoption, changes have been made to the map but none which affect-the
revisions being considered for ,Ash Avenue and the Burnham/Tigard
realignment. On November 9, 1983, the City-council adopted Ordinance 83-52
which accepted Volume II of the City's Comprehensive Plan containing
findings, policies and implementation strategies. The policies relating to
Ash Avenue read as follows:
"11.2.1 Ash Avenue shall be extended across Fanno Creek, enabling access
to the neighborhoods and commercial area without using Pacific Highway.
Design features shall be used to slow traffic and make the street as safe
as possible. Ash Avenue shall be designated as a minor collector in
conformance with the Master Street Plan. Design features and mitigation
measures shall hold traffic volumes to the middle limits of a minor
' collector.
ORDINANCE NO. 89-12L-I-
PAGE 1
11.2.2 Improvements to SW Ash Avenue from SW Hill to Fanno Creek shall be
constructed as a condition of development of adjacent properties. The
street improvements along with the development of a major commercial site
will increase traffic on Ash. A barricade shall be placed at Hill Street
approximately at the end of the existing pavement to protect the
neighborhood residents from the commercial traffic.
11.2.3 Methods of mitigating the traffic impact on the neighborhood shall
include, in the following order of improvement, construction:
a. Improving SW McDonald Street to interim maintenance standards to
encourage traffic from south of McDonald to use McDonald to exit to
Hall and/or Pacific Highway.
b. Improvements to the residential portion of Ash from Hill to Frewing.
These improvements could include -limited parking, delineation of
traffic lanes and sidewalks on one or both sides of the street.
C. The extension of SW Hill to SW O'Mara and/or the improvement of SW Ash
from Frewing to Garrett.
d. The extension of SW O'Mara to SW Hill parallel to SW Ash.
e. Removal of the barricade in place on SW Ash Avenue at SW Hill.
f. Improvement of SW O'Mara Street to interim maintenance standards to
encourage an alternate route.
g. Installation of traffic inhibitors to the residential portion of Ash .
If and when traffic volumes exceed the -middle range for a . minor
collector. Traffic inhibitors include but are-not limited to planting
islands, speed bumps, buttons, turning restrictions, load limits and
enforcement."
Compliance with the above policies is discussed in more detail in the
findings and conclusions section of this report. The proposed revision to
the Ash Avenue extension, however,' in effect will eliminate the need for
most of the above conditions as traffic volumes. through the neighborhood
will not reach the levels anticipated under the original alignment.
There are no policies in Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan which address
the Burnham/Tigard realignment.
3. Vicinitv Information
Ash Avenue extension - Currently, Ash Avenue is improved from SW McDonald
street north and north-westerly to a point approximately 225 feet past the
intersection with SW Hill Street. This section of Ash Avenue passes
through established residential neighborhoods of primarily single family
homes. The other section of'Ash is improved from SW Scoffins to commercial
and from SW Burnham southwesterly approximately 500 feet. This portion of
SW Ash runs through the Central Business District which is comprised of
mixed residential and commercial land uses.
ORDINANCE NO. 89-
PAGE 2
r
Burnham/Tigard realigivcient - The alignment which is the subject of this
report is currently not in place. Burnham currently runs from SW Main
Street to SW Hall Blvd. Burnham provides access to a mix of land uses
within the Central Business District.
4. Proposal Information
Over the past two years, the City has been engaged in an effort to create
and implement an action plan for the city center area. As part of that
effort, the City contracted with several different firms to provide
specialized recommendations for the area. Reports were prepared on the
economic potential of the area, transportation alternatives,
recommendations for improvements to Fanno Creek Park, design concepts for
the area, and possible funding sources. One element common to all of the
recommendations provided was the identification of the need to improve
access to and through the city center area. In. particular, the. draft of
the Downtown Tigard Traffic and Circulation Study. prepared by Kittelson &
Associates makes the following conclusions and recommendations:
"Create new entry portals into and out of the downtown area. These
new portals will have a beneficial effect on both local and regional-
traffic circulation patterns within the area. They are•necessa_*-y to
accommodate planned growth within the downtown area, while at the-same
time minimizing the interference between local and regional travel
needs."
Based on the conclusions and recommendations, Kittelson proposes a package
of improvement options including the following:
"Extension of Ash Street to connect between the Pacific Highway/Walnut
Street intersection and the existing Hall Boulevard/Hunziker Road
intersection;
Improvement of Burnham Street between Main Street and Hall Boulevard;
and
Realignment of Burnham Street to connect with the existing Main
Street/Tigard Street intersection."
The recommendation goes further to state that all of the improvements need
not be constructed at a single time and that a staged approach would work.
Under a staged approach, Kittelson recommends that the Burnham-Tigard
connection be constructed first. It is important to note that the
revisions proposed to the map do not imply construction of the
improvements immediately. The projects will have to be designed and funded
prior to construction. The urban Design Plan prepared by
Gutherie/Slusarenko/Associates also recommended the Burnham/Tigard
realignment and the Ash Avenue extension on the Capital Improvements
Projects list. In addition, the City Center Development Plan and Report
prepared by Moore Breithaupt-& Associates emphasizes the need for improved
access to the city center area and identifies the need for these specific
projects as necessary to improving the access and circulation to and
through the city center area.
ORDINANCE NO. 89-d
PAGE 3
5. Agency and NPO Comments
At the August 21, 1989 City Council meeting, NPO #1 presented an advisory
statement suggesting that the proposal be rejected and that another
solution would be more suitable which would better utilize the existing
Johnson-Pacific Highway signal, and open up the downtown area without as
much impact on property and lifestyle.
6. Planning Commission Recomendation
On June 20,1989, Planning Commission met and recommended in favor of the
proposed Burnham Road realignment and the Walnut to Ash Avenue connection,
with an Ash Avenue/Hill Street connection preserved as a future option.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2 and
12, and City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.1 a., 2.1.1,
8.1.1, 11.2.1, 11.2.2, 11.2.3 and applicable Community Development Code
sections related to legislative plan amendments.
Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable
Statewide Goals based on the following findings:
1. Goal 1 is met because the City has an adopted citizen involvement
program which includes review of land use applications by the
neighborhood planning organizations. In addition, public notice
has been provided.
2. Goal 2 is met because the City has applied all relevant Statewide
Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan policies, and Community
Development Code requirements in the review of this proposal.
3. Goal 12 is met because the city has adopted policies related to
improving the transportation network and continued coordination of
transportation improvements with other involved agencies.
Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the City's
acknowledged Comprehensive Plan based upon the following findings:
1. Policy 1.1.1 a. is satisfied because the proposed amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan will not affect compliance of the City's
acknowledged Plan with the Statewide Goals.
2. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because Neighborhood Planning
Organization #1 and surrounding property owners have been notified
of the proposal and the date- of the hearing and have been
encouraged to comment on the proposal.
3. Policy 8.1.1 is satisfied because the `amendments proposed to the
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map will address the need for a
safe and efficient street system designed to accommodate current
and future traffic volumes.
ORDINANCE NO- 89_..::,
PAGE 4
4. Policies 11.2.1, 11.2.2, and 11.2.3 are satisfied because the
proposal to revise the route of the Ash Avenue extension redirects
the extension away from the existing residential section of Ash
avoiding the potential of substantially increasing traffic volumes
through the local residential area. Policies 11.2.1, 11.2.2 and
11.2.3 were instituted to lessen the impact of the original route
on the residential neighborhood. This proposal by design
essentially meets the intent of those policies.
Section 2: The City Council upholds the__Planning Commission
recommendation for approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Transportation map amendment (Exhibit "A") showing the
realignment of Burnham St. to connect with Tigard St. and
showing the extension of Ash St. to provide a connection
between the Walnut/Pacific Highway intersection and the
Hunziker Street/Hall Boulevard intersection and following the
approximate alignment of the existing Ash Avenue in the
downtown area.
Section 3: The Council directs staff to proceed with the specific
alignment analysis, outlined in Exhibit "B" attached, to
determine practical alternative alignments for the proposed
new roadway between Hunziker and Walnut Streets.
Section 4: The Council, therefore ORDERS that the above referenced
request be APPROVED. The, Council FURTHER ORDERS that the
Planning Director and the City Recorder send a copy of the
Final Order as a Notice of Final decision to the parties in
this case.
Section 5: This ordinance shall be effective on and after the: 31st day
after its passage by council, and approval by the Mayor.
PASSED: By 1710U,6' vote of all Council members present
afte b ing read by number and title only, this 1/'-1A day
of , 1989.
/ Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recor r
APPROVED: This 11 day of , 1989.
Gerald R. Lfdwards, Mayor
dr/Ash.ln
ORDINANCE NO. 89--a-V-
PAGE 5
o
421
Y ~
M w y h~ J~H ` . Q
OA14 `i1oH
rN ~`~y pub vi Q U -
QO' yp0~ T~ > W
~aE y~ w
7N
ti L7-TTnTT
~ a
Q d '
FT -1
N ~6 i ' I
ccl
x a 1 d
W 2 Jv y4 y~, 4ytV~ 'i~ 3
Q
Z W ?OE
ul u f a w Eta
x ~ cs•
F- •M 's
f~ J•
3 y~ ~~tr ~'r s~E,~~aG ~sb
Y
is,
J 3 ad r
~ O~Ra~St y J b b~
DRAFT Exhibit
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TO DETERMINE A SPECIFIC ALIGNMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED WALNUT-HUNZIKER CONNECTION
Background
Tigard's City Center Plan has recommended construction of a new roadway to
provide a collector street connection between the Walnut Street/Pacific Highway
intersection and the Hunziker/Hall Boulevard intersection. On September 11,
1989, the City Council formally adopted the new roadway concept as a part of
the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map.
So far, only the roadway concept and a general corridor have been indicated.
No specific alignment has been defined. As a result, it' cannot be determined
which properties will be impacted by the new roadway nor to what extent they
will be impacted. This leaves uncertainty for residents as to the future
development and use*of their properties. To relieve the uncertainty, the City.
Council has directed that selection of a specific alignment proceed as quickly
as possible.
Purpose
The purpose of the consultant work will be to perform preliminary engineering
sufficient to identify practicable alternative alignments for the. proposed
roadway and to provide sufficient data on the alternative alignments so that a
specific alignment can be selected by the City.
Scope of Work
A. Citizen Input
Early in the preliminary engineering process, the consultant. will. be
expected to hold at least one public meeting to receive input from citizens
regarding specific concerns or goals which they wish to see considered
during the preliminary engineering process. The City will provide meeting
space.
In addition, the consultant will be expected to provide an opportunity for
property owners to express specific concerns or preferences to the
consultant in a one-on-one basis. These meetings would be expected to
provide an opportunity for property owners to convey to the consultant team
specific details about their properties which they wish the consultants to
consider. For example, some. property _owners have indicated specific ideas
for future development of their properties which they would like to
coordinate with the roadway design.
1
B. Development of Alternatives
The consultant will be expected to develop alternative street alignments
which meet the following criteria:
1. The new street should provide a connection between the Walnut/Pacific
Highway intersection and the Hunziker Street/Hall Boulevard
intersection and following the approximate alignment of existing Ash
Avenue in the downtown area. The Walnut/Pacific and Hunziker/Hall
intersections may be relocated if appropriate to achieve other design
criteria.
2. Each alignment shall meet the minimum design criteria for collector
streets.
3. The street should be designed to have a parkway type appearance in
accordance with the City Center Plan.
4. The proposed roadway should be designed with lane configurations and
intersection improvements in accordance with the guidelines outlined
in the Downtown Tigard Traffic and Circulation Study prepared by
Kittelson and Associates and dated August 1989.
5. The proposed alignment should be consistent with the Fanno Creek Park
F Plan to the maximum extent possible.
6. The new crossing of Fanno Creek shall be in accordance with the City's
Drainage Master Plan.
7. In each alternative, the consultant should indicate how a local street
connection could be constructed from the Ash-Avenue/Hill Street
neighborhood to the new street if such a connection is desired in the
future.
C. Comparison of Alternatives
The consultant should provide a comparison of the various alternatives
developed. The analysis of the alternatives should consider as a minimum
the following items:
1. Total cost including cost of construction and right-of-way
acquisition. In reporting costs, the consultant should show the
potential for phasing of construction.
2. Environmental impacts and the potential for mitigation of these
impacts. Environmental review should be limited to matters which may
affect selection of . an alternative alignment. A detailed
environmental impact statement is not required.
f~ 2
3. Impacts on existing buildings and the utility of any parcel
i_
remainders.
4. Consistency with the preferences expressed by property owners.
5. Consistency with the City Center Plan and the Fanno Creek Park Plan.
6. Ability to safely and efficiently accommodate the traffic volumes
projected in the Downtown Circulation Plan.
D. Public Review
After developing alignment alternatives and completing analysis of the
alternatives, the consultant will provide an opportunity for the public to
review the data which has been collected. Typically this would involve
issuance of a preliminary report followed by an informal public meeting to
explain the alternatives developed and to receive public comment.
E. Formal Report and Recommendations
After receiving public comment, the consultant will prepare a formal design
report and a recommendation of the alternative to. be selected by the City.
The consultant will be expected to present and support the recommendations
at formal hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Priorities
The City is especially anxious tp define a more specific alignment for the -
portion of the proposed roadway closest to Pacific Highway. Specifically, the
area of greatest concern is the developed area along Walnut Place, McKenzie
Place, and Ash Drive.
If it proves practical for the consultant to finish review. of the route closest.
to Pacific Highway ahead of completion of the remaining route review and to
bring this portion of the route to the public meeting and formal hearing
process, the City would wish to proceed with this phased approach.
dj/RFP-WHC.RW
3
r ~
• CT. s• S a
?Q
J
5
{
: Southbound 414
from
Conne1oto Xala Street
stablish a 99W
r tc~
E Yii9hway,
r par if
I • a, sm[
♦ 4r _
♦ ST
t -[1GARG
4 tC N £R ~ `
P6 cv pR
B ycwErtT
J '
TRANSPORTATION MAP
COj~I,REYiENSI'' PAN r . J
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 - VISITOW S AGENDA DATE: 3/12/91
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The
Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda,
but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff.
Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the
meeting. Thank you.
NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
117
i
C
Please sign in to testify on the following:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 DATE: 3/12/91
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT ZOA 90-0004 - LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
PLEASE PRINT
NAME & ADDRESS NAME & ADDRESS
PROPONENT OPPONENT
1
-
a`~F'IlTjii".~~- "'~iIU1~4' i~tlilih~~t`o~•~'`' iiul ~ y' {~Idi~ ' jil "a
cwt 4 r ~'•"i.:
PROCLAMATION'
NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK
April 1-7,1991 WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM has
~ a~iil ~'>i~'; .
' operated since 1974 to provide local governments with the resources required to meet the needs of persons of low and moderate Income; and, r p N;;-;
WHEREAS, Community Development Block Grant funds are used by a vast : ( •;y.
number of cities, counties and neighborhood-based nonprofit organizations'
throughout the Nation to address pressing neighborhood and human service
• needs; and,
'.I 1/-ICS`. ,l`•N ~/~I JJ/~">" WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM is %
i'~'~'• one of the few remaining federal programs to meet such low and moderate
Income needs as the dwindling supply of affordable housing, the massive!
rise in homelessness, and the resurfacing of hunger and malnutrition; and, ;
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM has r. x,
provided the City of Tigard with important and flexible assistance to help
meet the needs of our low and moderate income residents in funding
neighborhood revitalization, housing rehabilitation, public improvements, and x~
social s":-Aces; and,
1!? WHEREAS, the Congress and the Nation have often overlooked the critical value ,'-1:",
of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM and the
.
~ , , significant number of organizations and the projects that rely on its funds for ~ty`;s.•,•,
+ support; and '
.
WHEREAS, the week of April 1-7, 1991 has been reserved for recognition and
IIIYJd =
appreciation of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
_I PROGRAM.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, Gerald Edwards, Mayor of the "r
City Tigard, Oregon do hereby proclaim April 1-7, 1991 as NATIONAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK in Tigard, and all upon all citizens of
~G our City to participate in ceremonies and activities celebrating the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM.
. j: Gerald Edwards, Mayor
{~1f
JJ
f
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrato
DATE: March 4, 1991
SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, March - April 191
Official Council meetings are marked with an asterisk If
generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the
Monthly Council Calendars.
March '91
8-9 Fri/
Sat Council Goal Setting Workshop
Friday: 6:00 - 9:00 p.m.
Saturday: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon
*12 Tue Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
18-22 Mon-
Fri School Spring Vacation Week
*19 Tue Council meeting cancelled
20 Wed Eggs & Issues - (7:30 a.m.) - Ehlers
*26 Tue Council Business Agenda (5:30/7:30) - (Utilities &
Franchise Committee Workshop at 6:00 p.m.)
April 191
* 9 Tue Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
*16 Tue Council Study Agenda (6:30)
17 Wed Eggs & Issues - (7:30 a.m.) - Elmers
*23 Tue Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
May '91
*14 Tue Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
15 Wed Eggs & Issues - (7:30 a.m.) - Elmers
*21 Tue Council Study Agenda (6:30)
27 Mon Memorial Day - City Offices Closed
*28 Tue Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)
cccal
Council Calendar - Page 1
T
C COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: March 12, 1991 4DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Report on Status PREVIOUS ACTION: Council approved
of Park Le Improvements. + Several Park Levu Projects
PREPARED BY: Ron Bunch. Sr. Planner
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy. CD Director
POLICi ISSUE
Status report only.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Tigard Parks Levy was approved by the voters in the fall of 1989. Several
first and second year projects have been completed or are now underway. The
attached memo and "Yearly Project Breakdown" provides a general analysis of
the levy schedule and fiscal situation.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT
The levy's current fiscal situation may require use of system development
charges or some other source of revenue to complete the list of projects.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Receive and file.
rb/ccsunlev.edg
I
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrator
FROM: Ed Murphy, Community Development Directo
DATE: March 4, 1991
SUBJECT: Status of Park Levy Improvements
A comparison of park levy projected revenues and expenditures,
assuming remaining projects are implemented using original master
plan budget assumptions, indicates a short fall of about $204,000.
Total revenue is expected to be $1,541,072. This includes $60,000
in projected interest earnings and $51,000 in grants received to
date. It does not include an estimated $63,000 in future delinquent
levy collections. Total levy expenditures are expected to be
$1,745,193.
It will be possible to reduce this deficit by better defining the
scope of remaining projects through the design process, and perhaps
by finding a way to use projected delinquent levy collections.
Also, the developer of Summerlake subdivision has constructed levy
improvements in Summeriake Park as a condition of development
approval, and some work can, and has been done by the Tigard Parks
Maintenance Division. Still, other revenue sources, such as system
development charges will be needed to accomplish all of the levy
projects.
The following measures are examples of how savings can be realized
by adjusting the scope of certain projects and using delinquent
levy payments:
SAVINGS MEASURE POSSIBLE SAVINGS
Tigard Park Maintenance Installation of $12,500
Picnic Tables.
Reduced Scope of Fanno Creek Meadow 5,000
Planting.
Lower than Anticipated Engineer Estimate 10,000
for Durham Road/Cook Park Connection.
Delete Fanno Creek Bridge Relocation 7,000
Reduce Scope of Summerlake Park Restrooms 40,000
Find a Way to Utilize Delinquent 63,000
Levy Payments Sooner Rather Than Later
Total Possible Savings $ 137,500
The above indicates, after adjustments, the shortfall could be as
low as $70,000.
We have taken a project approach to implementing the Park Levy.
Consequently, many of the items on the master plan budget have been
combined into larger, more comprehensive projects. The sequence of
the projects have changed as improvements have been designed and
implemented. The attached "Yearly Project Breakdown" has been color
coded to indicate "Year 1" improvements completed or underway, and
in what year it is planned to initiate the remaining park levy
projects.
Staff will work with the Parks and Recreation Board to reduce costs
without substantially affecting the program and to identify
possible additional funding sources such as grants, and SDC's. We
will return to the Council for authorization to go out to bid for
"Year 2" levy improvements.
rb/memo.prk
l
it
yrnol
Yearly Project Breakdown
PROJECT SITE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TOTAL,
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
o Pto ad. V t,-;::;_,-....:,-$:80,000 o.;Rirerfhant.Development-$170,000,1 o Picnic Tables & Benches$ 22,500
o River-bank earthwork, : $134000 o Restroom Renovation $ 4D,000: 0 Atphalt:Traii S 92,400
COOK PARK stabillsationj Irrigation 0 Irrigation of Balmelds $ SS,050
and,landscaping and Play Area Sub-Total: $114,900
o Re~troom=Eraluatloa $ 2,000
Sub•Totalt $265,050
Sub-Total: $217,000 $5D6,650
o Land Acquisition $ 12,000 BhEssement acquisition & $49,050' o Fast Entry Improvement$ 21,750
FANNO CREEK o Bicycle Path (213 mile) 0 Meadow Planting $ 10,000
PARK Sub-Total. $ 72,000 o Foot Bridge Relocation $ 7,000:
Sub-total $S6,0S0 Sub-Total: $ 31,7S0 $159,800
o'Bridge at Dam' - $ 30,000-; o Winterlske Playground $ 60,000 o West End eroding $25,000
wlgnd Acquisition -1911,000 o Reetraom.at West End $ 80,000 and`Rougb Seeding
1.9;acres o Grading; Landscaping, $ 28,000 o Tennis Courts $ 50,000
o.Asphalt1rall-~'113 mile $ 24,000 Irrlgatlon and- - o Baskstbtli Courts $10,000'
SUMMERLAKE kom"phtygroiind to Pathway at Plsyground o-Plenit-Shelter $ 19,000
Winterlake Ave. o Plate; Tables $ 10,000.
PARK o. Laws Seeding at $ 16,800 Sub-Totah $168,000 o Initiation 4 Iendsap. $ 20,000
~-Lkesldev, ing at Pleate Ana
o Foolbrldges--,2.f -$..2,000
o,SoR Tra11,--&Ioag• ~ $-4,900 Sub•Totals $132,000
southwesters t edge of Inks
o East: Lake Playground - $ 30,000
.0 irrigation (riiai) $42,000
ralong•north-d: southeast
ides-of lake
Sub-Total: $244,700 '$544,700
o Englewood $ 79,000
(1.3 mites) o Pathender/Genesis $145,000 o Cook Park.
GREENWAY/ o Durbam Road-Cook (1.9 miles) 113th Connection $ 70,000
PARK PATHS Park Connection $ 70,000 Sub-Total: $148,000 Sub•Totah $ 70,000 $364,000
• Sub•Totalt $149,000
TOTAL $672,700 $634,100 $348,050 $1,665,450
TIGARD PARKS - TABLE 1
JeNly
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
d.
COUNCIL AGENDA !TZX SU:`yullnV
AGENDA OF: March 12, 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: February 26 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appeal of Subdiv ion PREVIOUS ACTION: H.O hr q. on 8 28 90•
Approval SUB 90-0010 Castile On appeal, Council hr s. 11/5/90 and 2 12 91
PREPARED BY: Jar Offe Asst. Planner
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK /J X A/ REQUESTED BY: Ed MuriohyLl Comm. Dev. Dir.
P LICY ISSUE
None.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The land use hearings officer approved, subject to conditions, a request for Subdivision
approval for Jim and Audrey Castile's proposed six lot subdivision. NPO #6 appealed the
September 10, 1990 decision citing concerns related to sanitary sewers, storm drainage,
street location, allowance of a private street, and a general concern with regard to the
pattern of development in the area east of SW 97th Avenue and north of Twali.ty Junior High
School.
Ahe Council reviewed the hearings officer's decision in a public hearing on November 5, 1990.
The Council continued the hearing and requested that the staff provide further review and
analysis. On February 12, 1991, the Council reopened the hearing. After listening to public
testimony and reviewing the staff report and recommendation, the Council voted unanimously
to uphold the Hearings officer's decision with a modification to condition of approval #11.
he modification was to require that storm drainage from the site be directed to an existing
public storm sewer, to the drainageway south of McDonald Street to the north of the subject
site, or to any other storm drainage system approved by the City Engineer. The Council
directed staff to draft a resolution upholding the decision with the above modilication. The
resolution drafted by staff and the Hearings officer's final order are attached.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
None.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve the attached resolution and final order.
JO:CCSUH.2c
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM L+, 3c,
l
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: March 12, 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: February 28, 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appointments to PREVIOUS ACTION:
Boards and Committees
PREPARED BY: Elizabe newton
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK/ 1I REQUESTED BY:
LI ~ ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The attached resolution outlines the recommendations of the Mayor's
Appointment Advisory Committee For filling vacancies on various Boards and
Committees. Copies of the applications are also attached for your
information.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the proposed resolution.
2. Adopt the resolution with amendments.
3. Decline action at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT
N/A
SUGGESTED ACTION
Alternative No. 1: Adopt the proposed resolution.
s =
i tiLL~, :.:►7
nigV ~ ~ 199a
nR~ CITY OF TIG D
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON
-
Name: BO Date: 1 l 0- (~O
Address (Res.): (O t 1 a l S. l~ , ✓ NT ZZ--j Res. Phone: (Q 14 - ~ (o O (b
Address (Bus.): -7050 5' , W . k) a 4e--pct fit,- 11-70(,2- Bus. Phone: 69)L-
Length of Residence in Tigard: 15 y R . Suggested oy:
Where did you live previously: A N cA , O S~
Educational Background: 1'~ o p- G,- A E SA N )4 L A bo>z 6 i o R t
~C~~►v~ES - ~2+E~oN 1i~5T~ TC{liNo!-o~ ~ L;CGvSC d READ ~STR~e S~1 f
Occupational Status and Background: ?,C ANI-TO CZ. -FL M L q + N
s yRS ~.X~~Ni~NCE .
Low long have you been employed with this firm: R
Is this Company located within your NPO area (NPO applicants only): IJ D
Previous Community Activity: Zc-. i C-0
Organizations and Offices: W R5 H i tv 9 T vr. C-0. v 2 J o~ Q LTo S- A m C- R- r c p ,s
O~i4.~`/ CiciNit/hL- }~\l~Tt}OL-O~is7'S C-JicAl_~,~!~"~
SSOC. ~ ~RST Pic-5~~i:N~1
Other Information (General Remarks):
Boards, Committees or NPO Interested in: N PC)
Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City Outside City
login\liz\citcomin
13125 SW -Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
CITY OF TIGD
ORECs®PI
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICA`T'ION
Name: Michael Meinecke Date: 1/8/91
Address (Res.): 10705 S.W. Murdock Ln. #r1 Tigard Res. Phone: 684-7961
Address (Bus.): 12615 S.W. 72 nd Tigard Bus. Phone: 684-2191
Length of Residence in Tigard: 15 years Suggested by:
Where did you live previously: Portland Or.
Educational Background: Attached
Occupational Status and Background: Custodial Supervisor Phil Lewis Elementary
Tigard School District see(attached)
t tow long have you been employed with this firm: 11.5 years
Is this Company located within your NPO area (NPO applicants only):
Previous Community Activity: none
Organizations and Offices:
Other Information (General Remarks): Phil Lewis recycling program received metro's
isCommitment to Recycling °award 1 99Q
Boards, Committees or NPO Interested in: utiliti es and Pranchi rnMmi -I-ee
Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City Outside City
login\liz\citcomin
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
NAME: Michael Meinecke DATE: 1215190
HOME ADDRESS: 10705 S.W. Murdock Ln. #F1 Tigard Or. 97224
BUSINESS ADDRESS : 12615 S.W. 72 nd. Tigard Or. 97223
HOME PHONE : 684-7961 BUSINESS PHONE: 6842191
DATE OF BIRTH : 6 /30161 SOCIAL SECURITY: 542-86-6839
SCHOOL LOCATION DATES MAJOR 1 DEGREE
Tigard High School Tigard 1979 Graduated
PCC Portland 1987 - present Heating 1 AC.
Hazardous
chemical safety
Or. Dept. of Energy Portland 1989 Tracking Energy Cost
Or. Dept. of Energy Portland 1989 Saving Energy Through
Effective Lighting
Alpha Computers Tigard 1990 Macintosh Fundamentals
LIST EXPERIENCE, SKILLS OR QUALIFICATIONS WHICH YOU FEEL WOULD
QUALIFY FOR THE POSITION :
I have worked for Tigard - Tualatin School District for eleven years. Eight years
as night custodian, three years as custodian supervisor. In this time I have seen a lot
of waste that could of been recycled. About three years ago I decided to do something
about it. After many phone calls and meetings, my recycling program has become
very effective. The school districts Director of Operation, Bud Hillman saw my
commitment and success with my large scale recycling program, he ask me to
research the possibilities of district wide programs.
Bud Hillman has recognized the savings recycling can produce. He asked me
to coordinate programs at all district sites that were interested in starting major
recycling programs. I have trained a number of custodians on how to set up large
scale recycling, emphasizing communication and cooperation with their waste
haulers.
Michael Mein "e
PHIL LEWIS ELEMENTARY
RECYCLING PROGRArl
I decided to start a recycling program at Phil Lewis Elementary
school in December of 1988. 1 began by talking to a number of people and
companies involved in handling recyclable materials. Because there was
so much to learn, I researched many different ideas. Before setting up a
program, I wanted to discover what would work best at Phil Lewis.
I contacted Pride Disposal to see what materials they would be
willing to haul for us. Pride was very helpful. They brought out a two
yard dumpster for cardboard, which they pick up weekly. Later they
started weekly pick up of glass, tin, newsprint, and aluminum. At that
time Pride was not hauling white or colored ledger, or plastic.
Being the custodial supervisor, I asked the custodial staff, as well
as teachers and students to change their waste disposal procedures. They
all agreed to help. We started small, with cardboard and newsprint. Both
were very easy to handle and to store. Then we started the other items
that Pride would haul. The cooks rinse the cans and bottles and save the
foil. They place all items in a box in the kitchen. Next, I was concerned
about our plastic chemical jugs. I contacted Environmental Recyclers.
They came to the school and let us know what plastics they would haul. I
decided to take it one step further and ask, students to bring their milk
jugs from home.
In the fall of 1989, we started collecting ledger paper We sorted it
by white or color, and hauled it to Far West Fibers. In the fall of 1990
Pride Disposol started hauling our ledger . The kids and staff really got
involved in the program. The students were also concerned about the use
of Styrofoam in the lunchroom. Due to a petition passed around by
students, we no longer use styrofoam trays for breakfast. The cooks now
use hard plastic trays, which the students rinse after using them.
For environmental and financial reasons, the staff and students have
worked together to help solve a problem in our society.
Mike MeinecKe
Custodial Supervisor
!lhiI 1 nt,,ir Cl -%v n- + -,I
References:
Bud Hillman Director of Operations Tigard School District 684-2221
13137 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Or. 97223
Art Ruktin Director of curriculum K-5 Tigard School District 620-1620
13137 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Or. 97223
Joan Grimm Association of Oregon Washington- Countv Health Dept. 648-8722
Recyclers (Edcuation) 155 N. frist Ave. Hillsboro, Or. 97124
Lauren Tissol Recycling Edcuator Metropolitan Service District 221-1646 ext.214
2000 S.W. frist Ave. Portland, Or. 97201
CIW OF TINA IM
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON
NAME: Douglas R Saxton DATE:
ADDRESS (RES.):13415 SW Village Glenn Drive RES. PHONE: 639-0732
ADDRESS (BUS.):PGE, 121 SW Salmon, Portland. OR 97223 BUS. PHONE: 464-7321
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 18 y s, 2 mo SUGGESTED BY: imZAii rPy Cacti 1P
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Siinnyva l P , .a i i f nr"n i a
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.S MMath, MS App 1 i ed Math, vari mis courses (accfig, finance,
econ, mktg) in business, management, and computer systems
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Currently nata Adminictratnv- (rPaTnnQihle fnr data
base de_G_i_gn) at PGF.; 25 yParc in rninpit_Pr_gyatemc work in ena723eer7.ng, t°le
t•omm ininationc, mots liniz, and bticinPGS an'nli ationc
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 11~7Pa ra
"S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: TggiiP =rPCPntPr at 1990 Farinn Creek ronfpxenre
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Currently SCty of board for Parifir- NnrthwPCt Software
Qtuality Cnnferenc s have heen hnard nfficer (2rPC, xrp' set-ty) fnr two-privg e
-schools in SW Portland; Currently vice-chairman of finance committPP nf my hur
OTHER INFORMATION -(GENERAL REMARKS): I_bavg an interest in be ino shape the future of
nt wil
crPat P P\TPn hi ggPr cbal l Pn9PR
BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Planning CnmmjSzjnn
Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City. Outside City
sb/4772A/0002A J
13125 SW Hail Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
~W`~
CITYOFF TIVA
0 RD.
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
Name: Date: 11-6-_9.0
Address (Res.): 13445 S.W. 110 Ave Tigard OR 97223 Res. Phone: -629=9530
Address (Bus.): Reis. Phew: 69, -042t.
- W962 Length of Residence in Tigard: 17 years Suggested by:
Where did you live previously: Sacramento CA
Educational Background: f n QxPgn State univPrcit;x
Occupational Status and Background: Customer Service Rep, Portland General Electric
EXtPnsive work with and knnwlndge of grnwt-h in Wngl,i,ngtnn ra -
_low long have you been employed with this firm: 14 years
Is this Company located within your NPO area (NPO applicants only): . rvpc area -nn fari, i ri PG
Previous Community Activity: Tigard Little League, Tigard High Graduation party committees
American Assoc of University Women YWCA
Organizations and Offices: Held various offices within AAUW and YWCA. Years ago was leader
Other Information (General Remarks): i calcul atQ and submit all streetl i g tang hills from
g~ p~ tothP Citynf Tigard, haVP wnrked PXYPTQi VPl y with nthPr _P _ G _ F. _ nerannnP,_ n-n
BoalraS, &mnu~tees o'r NPO Interested in: NPO 111 or (ti 1 i ty & Franni c rnmmi t tPP
Date Received at City Hall Date Wen+iewed
Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO
inside City OuWde City
40gin\liz\dtc0min
13125 SW Nall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard,-Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
e
CITY OF TICS ®
- ~
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON
Name: G~eE ~jsPE2vZ,4- /z~S/g o
Address (Res.): 146 0 6//0 _AAr.O n' 5 0-7- R ts. Phone: 0124 - /O 6 6
Address (Bus.): 67,00 5W 5,f77/0&(A:24, i /6,0Wa ale Bus. Phone: 639 6-354a
Length of Residence in Tigard: Suggested by: _
Where did you live previously: % tka l in 6/pi
Educa..tional Background: 116, Sr'JaS~/sS ,4c4~OcZ!f ~ Az IA- A--ze • ~ A. 50zt4e
5rdna yi/ . All UC640 uC . C& ouCY. 6G ~Bni2., a,~ 04/Znv~~c-
Occupational Status and Background:
~,Qp v taw UPiL-ISL,rg ,lei_~ lAl~ -frG~
ha--e aua-~ -
low long have you been employed with this firm: ix~ ~'Stia,. r Axe,
199b Ge~-'-
Is this Company located within your NPO area (NPO applicants only):
Previous Community Activity: r M61- ADmP~1~ ~t ~ TrgcLrd ' -
49 'tIZAa
%J V
Organizations add Offices:
Other Information (General Remarks): L I ~ P&W 6
of u~;l ~rPc~ Lu, 'r lil,t C%'►Nlm~il Vie
c ,r{ nQ cyc?~h/. u I~t,Qo`~ / i► _'o /S
Boards, Committees or NPO Interested in:
Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed _ Board, Committee, or NPO
Inside City Outside City
login\liz\citcomin
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
,
CITY OF TIG D
CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON
Name: Wandama Githens Date: Jan. 21, 1991
Address (Res.): 9675 SW Hillyiew Court. Tiga-r-i Res. Phone: 620-5606
Address (Bus.): _ Retired Bus. Phone: _
. Gene Selna
L engih of Kesidence in Tigard: 10 years
Where did you live previously: Portland - 29 ,years
Educational Background: See attached for details
Occupational Status and Background:
ow long have you been employed with this firm:
Is this Company located within your NPO area (NPO applicants only):
Previous Community Activity:
Organizations and Offices:
Other Information (General Remarks):
Boards, Committees or NPO Interested in:
Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed
Date Appointed Board, Committcc, or NPO
Inside City Outside City
login\Iiz\citcomin
13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171
Name: Wandama Githens
Address: 9675 SW Hillview Court
Tigard, 97223
Address (Bus.): Retired 1986
Length of Residence
in Tigard: 1981 to present
Where lived previously: Portland; OR 29 years
Education Background: Approx. 3 years of colleges and
business colleges. Special courses
and subjects relating and pertaining
to advancement in work field.
Completed MS-DOS course PCC, fall of
1989.
Occupational status and
Background: Administrator's secretary plus
Executive Secretary of Bess Kaiser
Hospital and the Permanente Clinic,
*RMS, CMT, MRL, TR, MRT, plus
Surgical Sec.- 4 years, Pathology
Sec. 10 years.
Have medical shorthand and many years
of computer experience.
Worked approximately 43 years in the
Medical Field.
How long employed by firm: Retired - 1986.
Is company within NPO area: Residence within NPO area.
Previous Community Activity: Taught swimming to children ages 4
through 18 (including 10 years for the
handicapped) - 1955-1984 (approx.)
for the Red Cross as a Water Safety
Instructor. This also included adult
classes intermittently.
Spent one summer at Camp Easter Seal
in Reedsport.
Taught CPR , including private
companies approx. 10 years.
Cont. page 2
Taught grade school Sunday School
at Portsmouth Trinity - 4 years, and
teenage class at St. John Lutheran -
10 years.
Played the organ at The Grotto every
Sunday during the summer months
from May to September 1972 to 1984.
"Organizations and Offices: None in the political arena.
Other Information: Trying to be an armchair politician
accomplishes nothing, one has to act
to be heard.
Boards, Committees or NPO
Interest in: As needed, wherever assigned.
*RMS (Registered Medical Sec.)
CMT (Certified Medical Transcriptionist)
MRL (Medical Records Librarian)
TR (Tumor Registrar)
MRT (Medical Records Transcriptionist)
Surgical Secretary - 4 years
Pathology Secretary - 10 years
t
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM u•-3 b
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: March 12. 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: February 28. 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Board and PREVIOUS ACTION:
Committee Reappointments
A - - q
I/1n PREPARED BY: Elizabeth- N ewton -
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OKIZ I REQUESTED BY:
i~WL CY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The attached resolution recommends individuals for reappointment to various
Boards and Committees. The individuals listed have been contacted
individually and have expressed interest in serving an additional term. In
addition, an attendance check has been conducted to ensure individuals have
met minimum requirements.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
J. Adopt the proposed resolution.
2. Adopt the resolution with amendments.
3. Decline action at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT
N/A
SUGGESTED ACTION
Alternative No. 1: Adopt the proposed resolution.
s'.
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: March 12, 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: February 26, 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Agreement for PREVIOUS ACTION:
improvement of Scholls Ferry Road A-t
PREPARED BY: City Engineer _
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK I REQUESTED BY: ODOT
POLICY ISSUE
Shall the Council authorize an agreement for Scholls Ferry Road improvements?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
ODOT has requested that Tigard sign the attached agreement regarding the
improvement of Scholls Ferry Road between Murray Boulevard and Fanno Creek.
Washington County and the City of Beaverton have already executed the
agreement. Tigard's responsibility would be to provide existing right of way
necessary for installation of traffic signals and to relocate any conflicting
City utilities. Engineering Department review indicates that there are no
conflicting utilities.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the attached resolution authorizing the signing of the agreement.
2. Request that the agreement be modified.
FISCAL IMPACT
The project is funded by ODOT, Washington County, and fees paid by private
developers in lieu of street improvements. No City funding is required.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
rw/sum-sch
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM `r'
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: March 12, 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: February 21, 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 97th Avenue PREVIOUS ACTION:
Bikeway Funding Agreement
PREPARED BY: Gary Alfson
94 - DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Shall the City accept funding for bikeway improvements on 97th Avenue.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
We have been successful in obtaining State bikeway funding to construct
shoulder bikeway improvements along both sides of 97th Avenue between
McDonald Street and Templeton School. 97th Avenue qualified for the funding
because it is an important segment for the bike route system around Templeton
and Tuality Schools. The estimated project cost is $55,000. The State will
pay 80% of the costs up to a maximum of $44,000.
If the Council wishes to accept this State funding, it is necessary to
approve a resolution authorization execution of the attached agreement.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the resolution authorizing execution of the funding agreement.
2. Request changes to the agreement.
3. Reject the funding offer.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approximately $11,000 matching money from the City's Streets CIP Fund (to be
budgeted in FY 91-92).
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approval of the attached resolution.
dj/GA:ss-97th.GA
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM y a ?4
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM STi1411LARY
t
AGENDA OF: March 12, 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorization PREVIOUS ACTION:
for Right-of-Way Acquisition for A
Bonita Road PREPARED BY: Gary Alfson Trans . En q_.
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Acquisition of right-of-way and easements for the Bonita Road project.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Right-of-way and easements are needed in order to construct the proposed street
improvements on Bonita Road. As has been done with other street projects, staff
is requesting that the Council formally authorize the acquisition of the right-
of-way and easements by adoptioi, of the attached resolution.
( ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Adopt the attached resolution authorizing acquisition of right-of-way.
2. Withhold authorization.
FISCAL IMPACT
All costs of the Bonita Road project are funded by the Major Streets Traffic
Safety Improvement Bond.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adoption of the attached resolution.
dj/h:engdoc\counci1\ss-bonit.GA
c`'j.
COLVCIL AGENDA ITEM:
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: 3/12191 DATE SUBMITTED: 3/1/91
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Agreement with PREVIOUS ACTION: The City Council
Washin on Count to accept CDBG fun s authorized submittal of this CDBG
for athwa s near Metzger School. proposal in October, 1987.
PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts, Adm Plan
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK / REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy. CD Director
PO ICY ISSUE
To enter into an agreement with Washington County accepting $60,732 in Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for the construction of pedestrian pathways in the
vicinity of Metzger School.
- - - INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Community Development Block Grant Policy Committee has recommended that the City
be awarded $60,732 for the construction of pathways in the vicinity of Metzger School.
The project involves the construction of 5-foot wide asphalt pathways along SW 90th
Ave. between SW Locust St. and SW Oak St. and along SW 90th St. between SW Hall Blvd.
and Locust St. The pathways will meander along the right-of-way following an alignment
that would require the least clearing and impact to adjacent properties. Because the
right-of-way along the streets are irregular in width or are narrower than would be
required for full width improvements, not all of the proposed pathways can be
constructed in locations compatible with future road improvements. However, there are
no roadway improvements along these streets planned within the foreseeable future. The
project will alleviate serious safety concerns of children walking to school in the
street or along the shoulder of the road.
it
The CDBG agency anticipates County Contract Review Board approval sometime during the
week of March 4, 1991. Copies of the contract will be available for review and action
at the Council's March 12, 1991 meeting. The CDBG Policy Board has selected a project
completion date of September 1, 1991. Council approval of the contract on March 12,
1991 would allow the City to get a head start on the project and help avoid any
unforseen problems with timely completion.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
- Sign the agreement on March 12, 1991 to accept the CDBG funds.
- Not to accept the grant.
FISCAL IMPACT
All of the design and construction costs are chargeable to the Community Development
Block Grant. Local sources of project funding are limited to in-kind staff
administrative time (estimated at $1,200) and the cost of legal and public notices
($150).
SUGGESTED ACTION
Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
1, dr/ccsum
t
Council Agenda Item 5 was continued to April 9, 1991.
This was Sign Code Exception - Sherwood Inn SCE 90-05/VAR 90-27
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
~(1QrGti 12 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: Febr4&ry 19, 1991 DATE SUBMITTED: January 29, 1991
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Revisions to the PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission
Bufferinq and Screening Standards of A Recommended Approval of the Amendments
the Tiqard Development Code. *Dvelopmeni at Their January 21, 1991 Meeting.
PREPARED BY: Ron Bunch, Sr. Planner
DEPTHEADOK CITY ADMIN OREQUESTED BY: C.D. Director
- ---SSUE
Should the City Council revise tCode standards as they relate to
buffering and screening?
=x=o=asax=xaaxae==sax=cxc=a=s=xaasax=a=axssaxsaxaix=aaaxoca=xasaxsasssc=axcx=
INFORMATIOtt SUMMARY
A public hearing on the proposed Code revisions was opened by the Council on
December 17, 1990, and continued to a date certain. The Council, at that
meeting, referred the amendments to the Planning Commission for additional
review. The Planning Commission, on January 21, 1991, voted unanimously to
recommend adoption for approval with several suggested changes.
Most of changes proposed by the Planning Commission are minor in nature.
However, the Commission has proposed one significant departure from the original
code amendments. The Planning Commission has suggested that developers of single
family projects not be required to provide buffering and screening from adjacent
zones or uses which are of a different type. Staff believes that there are good
arguments both for and against requiring single family developments to provide
buffering and screening.
The revisions are intended to accomplish the following objectives:
1. Increase the level of buffering and screening between different potentially
incompatible uses; 2. Add new land use categories that are required to install
buffering and screening; and 3. Provide for more specific standards.
These amendments will better protect land uses from each other and add more
clarity to the Code. They will also increase the cost of development, both
because more area is required to be buffered and screened, and because the
standards for buffering and screening would be raised.
There has been no comment from the public or development community on the
proposed ordinance revisions.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Not adopt the buffering and screening revisions.
2. Adopt the revisions as per the Planning Commission's recommendation.
3. Make additional changes, and adopt the proposed buffering and screening
provisions.
- - -
FISCAL IMPACT
No measurable impact to the City is anticipated. The more specific nature of the
revisions will make the ordinance easier to administer and may result in saved
staff time.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Adopt the revised buffering and screening standards as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
rb/ccsumbuf.rb9
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrator
FROM: Ed Murphy, Community Development Directo
DATE: February 11, 1991
SUBJECT: Revisions to the Buffering and Screening Provisions of
the Tigard Development Code
The Planning Commission, at their January 21, 1990, voted
unanimously to recommended to the City Council that the attached
revisions to the buffering and screening provisions of the Tigard
Development Code be approved. The Planning Commission recommended
a number of wording changes to the proposed ordinance language.
These changes have been included in the attached revised provisions
(Exhibit "A"). The reasons for these changes are described as
follows:
Section: 18.100.080 General Provisions
There was concern with the concept that, "a detailed buffering/
screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an
alternative to the buffering and standards provided it affords the
same degree of buffering as required by the code."
It was felt that instead of a director's decision, a variance
should be required if a developer proposes to reduce the dimensions
required by the code for a buffer area. However, the director
should have the flexibility to objectively evaluate alternative
buffer area landscaping and screening proposals. With this in
mind, the following language was proposed
"In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and
screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an
alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards,
provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as
required by this code." (New wording is in bold)
18.100.090. D (2)
It was felt that the words, "In addition", should be added to the
sentence to make it clear that shrubs need to be planted in buffer
areas "in addition" to trees.
This provision is proposed to read as follows:
"In addition, at least 10 five Gallon shrubs or 20 one -gallon
shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required
buffer area. (New wording is in bold)
1
18.100.090 E (1)
C The word "evergreen" as used in this sentence was thought to be
confusing. It was mentioned that many people could interpret this
as meaning that only coniferous shrubs are to be used, and not
utilize broadleaf evergreen plants such as laurel, photinia, mock
orange, etc. This provision is proposed to read as follows:
"A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be planted
which will form a four foot continuous screen within two years of
planting, or;_ (New wording is in bold)
18.100.090 E (3)
It was mentioned that property owners should, if necessary, have
the opportunity to build taller fences to provide for adequate
screening. This provision is proposed to read as follows:
"A five foot or taller fence or wall shall be constructed to
provide a continuous sight obscuring screen." (New wording is in
bold)
The Planning Commission was asked by staff as to whether non-
conforming uses should be buffered and screened. An example used
in the discussion was, "Should non-conforming residential uses in
commercial, or industrial zones cause an adjacent developer to use
C a portion of his property to install buffering and screening?" The
Commission felt strongly that non-conforming uses should be
buffered and screened from adjacent uses. This is what the
proposed ordinance provides.
The Commission felt that developers of single family projects
should not be required to provide buffering and screening from
adjacent existing uses of a different type as was proposed by
staff. The Commissioners felt that this is an issue of individual
preference. Future property owners should have the opportunity to
choose whether to install their own buffering and screening. This
change has been made on the attached buffering and screening
matrix.
Staff believes that there are good.arguments both for and against
requiring single family developments to provide buffering and
screening. The Council may wish to evaluate whether this would be
appropriate in all cases, especially if single family development
is built adjacent to industrial uses. A possible way to approach
this issue would be to require "residential subdivisions" to
provide buffering and screening from commercial and industrial uses
and zones instead of "detached dwelling units."
The revised buffering and screening standards are attached as
Exhibit "A". Because of the extent of the proposed changes, both
2
r- the proposed and current buffering and screening matrices are
attached for comparison by the Council as Exhibits "B" and "C"
respectively. The proposed changes have been indicated to the
extent possible on the current matrix (Exhibit "C". Areas where
changes are proposed have been highlighted. However, it is
important that the following additional major changes be noted on
the proposed matrix (Exhibit "B"):
Instead of the words, "Abutting Zoning District" being used,
the following is proposed "Abutting Use or Zoning District."
This means that non-conforming uses, such as existing single
family homes in an industrial district, would cause new
adjacent industrial development to installing buffering.
- Different buffering and screening standards are proposed for
one-story and multi-story attached dwelling units
respectively. Multi-story attached dwelling units would have
to provide for greater buffering and screening when adjacent
to single story residential units.
- Buffering and Screening standards have been increased between
commercial/professional uses and residential uses.
- Mobile home parks and subdivisions is a new category which
requires buffering and screening from different uses.
- Parking lots containing more than four spaces on adjacent
property are proposed to be buffered and screened from
residential uses.
Staff is continuing to draft other related language regarding
setbacks, front yard and parking lot landscaping standards,
landscaping and buffering along arterial streets, and street tree
provisions. These will be forwarded to the Planning Commission in
the near future.
rb/mccbuff2.12
3
0
IF
i
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BUFFERING AND SCREEN ING STANDARDS
OF TITLE 18 OF THE TIGARD MUNCIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 18.100, "Landscaping and Screening," provides
for regulations to reduce the impacts that result from adjacent zones and uses of different
types through the application of buffering and screening standards.
WHEREAS, in certain situations the above buffering and screening standards have been
found to be lacking in mitigating these adverse impacts.
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that amendments to Chapter 18.100 of the Tigard
Municipal Code, identified as Exhibits "A" and 'B" are necessary to enhance community
livability by further reducing the impacts that adjacent uses of different types have on one
another.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Chapter 18.100 shall be amended as shown in Exhibits "A" and 'B".
SECTION 2: In Exhibit "A" added portions are underlined and deleted portions are shown
in [brackets].
SECTION 3: Exhibit'B" hereby referenced as the'Buffering and Screening Matrix," Section
18.100.110, shall be adopted in its entirety to replace Section 18.100.130
"Buffer Matrix."
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council,
approval by the Mayor, and posting by the City Recorder.
PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by
number and title only, this day of ,1991
Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder
APPROVED: This day of . 1990.
Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney Date
ORDINANCE NO. 91- rb/bufford.rM
71
r
Council Agenda Item
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council
FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder
DATE: March 4, 1991
SUBJECT: Second Reading - Ordinance No. 91-03; CPA 90-0010
Amendment to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map
Attached is the proposed ordinance, as amended by Council at their
February 19, 1991 meeting, for the above-referenced Comprehensive
Plan Amendment.
Since the ordinance was not adopted by a unanimous vote of Council
present on February 19, it is being submitted to Council for a
second reading and roll-call vote.
Attachment
cuc34.2