Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Packet - 02/26/1991
o~ CITY OF TIGARD OREGON JOINT MEETING: TIGARD'CITY AGENDA COUNCIL/TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 80A`r3D PUBLIC NOT/CE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda Item EEBRUARY 26, 1991 6..3. PM should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is TIGARD CIVIC CENTER available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning '!3125 SW MALI.. Ir31.110 of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda Items are asked to be TIGARD, ORI:~aClN 9723 two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. • STUDY SESSION (6:30 p.m.) 1. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD DISCUSSION MEETING (7:00 p.m.) • School District Topics: 1. Long-Range Plan a. May Tax Base b. Remodeling of Tigard High School C. School Boundaries 2. Impa&t of Ballot Measure 5 3. Proposed Legislation to cities, counties, fire districts, regarding fees charged to school districts • City Topics 1. Parking at Tigard High School 2. School Capacities 2. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 3. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 4. ADJOURNMENT ca226.91 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 - PAGE 1 rr council Agenda ItemL l! JOINT CITY OF TIGARD AND TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNCIL AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 • Meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Edwards. 1. ROLL CALL Council Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten and John Schwartz City Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; Liz Newton, Community Relations Coordinator; Tim Ramis, City Attorney; and Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder. 2. STUDY SESSION Water District Recently the City Administrator, Mayor and the Board Chairs and District Administrators for both Tigard and Metzger Water District met to discuss consideration of a merger. City Administrator reported that, at this time, there are inherent philosophical differences between the two districts. Metzger is involved in a process of merging with the Wolf Creek Water District which is scheduled to be heard soon before the Boundary Commission. City Administrator advised that he and the Mayor asked the Metzger Water District to consider delaying the proposed merger with Wolf Creek for up to 60 days. This would. give Tigard an opportunity to research what is in the best interests for the residents of the City of Tigard. On February 26, the City received notification from the Boundary Commission that they are delaying the hearing on the merger proposal of Wolf Creek and Metzger until their April 4, 1991 meeting. This is a complex issue and City Administrator suggested that a series of meetings be held to inform representatives of Council on the water issues. Mayor Edwards, Councilors Johnson and Eadon will participate in these meetings; written material will be distributed to all Council members. Meeting Cancellation Consensus of Council was to cancel the March 19, 1991 meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 - PAGE 1 S JOINT CITY COUNCILJSCHOOL BOARD DISCUSSION MEETING • Called to order by Mayor Edwards at 7:04 p.m. • Present from Tigard-Tualatin School Board: Jack Clinton, Chair; Board members: Pat Biggs, Richard Carlson, Gary Cumpston, and Mike Nelson. School District Staff Present: Russ Joki, Superintendent; Rae Bowen, Administrative Secretary; Al Davidian, Assistant Superintendent; Frank Hodapp, Business Manager. School District: May Tax Base The School District will be asking for an updated Tax Base on the May Ballot. As a result of growth and two new schools, tax base approval takes on new importance. The School Budget Committee will begin next week to determine the exact amount of an updated tax base request. The following points were made: • Growth has far exceeded expectations. • Estimated tax base request is $2.5 million over tax rate cap (set by Ballot Measure 5); School District will look to the State for replacement of this amount. • If tax base does not pass, $7.2 million will have to be cut from the budget. • May election is the last time the School District will be able to increase tax base because of the "cap" situation created by Ballot Measure 5. • A list of potential program reductions is being prepared; a copy will be sent to City Council. • 82% of the School. Districts budget is labor related as is customary with a business which provides services. Mandatory collective bargaining is a major factor in costs. • Programs required by State legislation are frequently costly; however, no funding sources are identified or provided when schools are required to introduce a new program or provide additional services. • Capital items, with the exception of highest-priority safety improvements, have been severely reduced the last three years. • At this time, it is expected that an updated tax base would translate to a property tax increase on a $100,000 home by $197 a year. Remodeling Project - Tigard High School Chuck Selig of the Selig, Lee and Rueda Architects firm reviewed the Tigard High School remodeling project. The facility is being upgraded to accommodate new students. In the 92-93 school year, the high school will also have 9th grade students. The new high school and middle schools in Tualatin will be opened in September 1992. Both high schools will be closed campuses. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 - PAGE 2 High School Parking Issues There was discussion on problems associated with student parking in neighborhoods near the high school. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Council and School Board that affected/interested parties, such as the school, neighborhood, and City staff work together on an equitable solution. There was a brief review of complaints of student loitering on property nearby to the school. It was noted that the loiterers may not be students; rather, they may be young people who are no longer attending school. School Board members suggested concerns be directed to the principal's office. It was emphasized that the vast majority of Tigard High School students are responsible young people. School Boundaries School Board and staff presented information on growth projections and how new boundaries are determined. The Bull Mountain area continues to grow at a fast pace. The School- District plans to work with Portland State University in putting together a computer model and tracking system to project growth and associated needs based on the latest census information. The high school boundaries will be determined by next December or January. As new residents move into the Bull Mountain area, they are put on notice that their elementary school children may not go to Mary Woodward School as that school is at over capacity. There was discussion on the impact statement prepared by the School District in their review of new development proposals. After discussion, the consensus was that the City would acknowledge school capacity concerns in their Final Order statements on new development. City Attorney advised such a statement would probably refer to the Comprehensive Plan requirement prescribing that impacts to schools be reviewed. City Attorney responded to a question asking if a development could be denied because of school capacity problems. He advised that the only way to stop development is to declare a building moratorium. He explained this was not regarded as a suitable way to address growth concerns largely because of the way the state statutes are worded. If a building moratorium is declared, the City Council would become the agency charged with remedying the problem; therefore, planning for school growth and related issues would be reviewed by City Council, transferring this responsibility from the school district. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 - PAGE 3 Classroom Size Mayor Edwards asked for clarification on how classroom sizes are determined. Superintendent Joki reviewed the three elements of class-size determination: 1. State Standards if a district violates minimum ' classroom sizes, the State School Board may withhold funds. 2. Contract negotiation collective bargaining agreements prescribe class size. 3. Parental preference is for smaller class sizes. General Discussion Following are some additional issues discussed: • Identity Schools and cities rely on each other for promotion of community identity and citizen involvement. It was suggested that it would be easier for Tigard and Tualatin to promote their cities and to work together to maintain citizen involvement if a bridge was built on 85th Street over the Tualatin River. • Tigard is twice the size of Tualatin; therefore, high school students who live in Tigard will attend schools in Tualatin. • The high schools will. be about the same size and will offer equal programs. • When fully "built out," Tigard will have about 60,000 people which means one more elementary and secondary school will probably be needed. • Jerry C. Reeves, of J.C. Reeves Corporation, advised of a development of approximately 300 acres in the southwest section of Tualatin. This property is across the street from the new high school; however, students from this area are in the Sherwood School District. There was discussion on the difficulties in changing school district boundaries. The process is cumbersome and consent must be received from all affected jurisdictions. Board Chair Clinton recommended that Mr. Reeves attend an upcoming meeting scheduled with the School Board and Tualatin City Council. The Sherwood School district would have to agree to a boundary change in this instance. • A member of the audience asked for discussion on the feasibility of dividing the school district into two districts; i.e., Tigard/Tualatin. School Board responded that districts are, for the most part, consolidating CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 - PAGE 4 f rather than dividing. This avoids duplication of efforts which translates into cost savings. In addition, special class offerings become possible in a larger district. • The School District has asked Senator Paul Phillips to sponsor two legislative proposals: 1. Allow the schools to collect system development impact fees on new development. 2. Exempt'schools from paying review fees charged by other taxing jurisdictions (i.e., architectural review fee charged by a fire district). • Mayor Edwards emphasized the need for education and understanding the State and local government process in order to resolve some of the major issues facing cities and schools now. • Urban schools continue to be impacted by density requirements established by the State. There is some discussion at the state level of possibly increasing urban density requirements from an average of 10 units per acre to 12 units per acre EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:05 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. ADJOURNMENT: 10:17 p.m. W 6atherifie Wheatley, City Recor r Attest: Mayor, City of Tigard Date: 3 Iq / ccm216.91 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 - PAGE 5 '011° Legal t 835 OUP AN Nctice q~ ~»U 3 C 5"s-M. S,3V 86A'036Q ~L1""'fPt}z 7,~~,~ V1s pNONE t M .0, WCttY e P .O aoX 3zo ToN, oRESaH szoz ` vauign$~ned fttb caliinbg9,: z ab BEAKER e folio p~tR+ , or y~ > ; + ~6otice A~vertisitt9 a oe~d; C. $OtAR~ e9al rshe Not►ca B `°"OIl~T SG'R `~y Afftdav" v `UTIC'A1~DI5 S,i s ate ~R ~,:~p~~`' r puPlic g B ,R TMAP-©~ k D • C 397 =31 g WIAI.~ g A : na11 o Tigard city PO 130Y. 23 oil tucly F Boa4d ow • Or 97223 xlob©ot~ T Kid'a Hsu o~' jzg~~ 8 cATiDt, < onW ~~t GOO, s' SPATE O 0 W ASNIOGTO KoeY►3 ex a Advertising pap' m u depose and eay ax ORS 193.0'10 .v~ ion ,g >s . first duty sworn, of Cdefinad m ~~in the, at clerk ~1 Ts q' "ae ~ being or his princ►p irc atu pirectorer of general c d „ ~ ed at ! 1 'eSC 00 a in tfie > s ne 02 93 blis St a t01, at n was Pshea and 193. P `11 a ~U+ ub►i an d ` eret0 anngXed, successive i i iSl► r + ' ich is h e r+ `Pt1; COP)' of wh et forte a Printed ewsPap entire *Issue of said n -Issues.. consecutive in the following 21 1991 Feb s ~y 1991 da of E before me this 2s i t pub sworn t Oregon Subscribed and lic for Ootary Xpiras: my commission A~Flppdf[ low 2), - Cvu,~n 6 L S txt s5 i Y1,1 MEMORANDUM h) C° l~ Q CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council ~f FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator DATE: February 26, 1991 SUBJECT: Meeting with the Metzger and Tigard Water Districts Chairs & Administrators We met with John Kvistad and John Miller of Tigard District and Ray Pirkl and Jesse Lowman of the Metzger Water District on February 20 to discuss the prospects of their consideration of a merger. As was expressed several times during the conversation, there are inherent philosophical differences between the two districts. Metzger is open to the notion of consolidation with Tigard as long as Wolf Creek is included. Metzger firmly believes that water will become a regionalized service and that it is best to consolidate districts now rather than await a forced consolidation. Metzger also believes there are clear advantages to the regionalization of ~g services, especially with respect to water source. They believe the alliance with Wolf Creek creates greater source opportunities. Tigard, on the other hand, argues it is willing to consider consolidation with Metzger as long as Wolf Creek is excluded. Tigard espouses the theory of local control and rejects the notion that water will become a regionalized service. Tigard argues that responsiveness is a characteristic of the smaller districts and would be lost through consolidation into a larger district. We explained to both water districts that we knew little about the nuts and bolts associated with water policy at this stage, but that the proposed merger of Metzger and Wolf Creek forces us to consider what is in the best interests, long-term as well as short-term, for our residents. We argued that it is in the best interests of the community that one district serves the entire community, but readily admitted that we did not know anything about the economics or compatibility of merging the Tigard and Metzger Water Districts. We asked Metzger Water District to consider delaying the consideration of its merger with Wolf Creek for up to 60 days. During this 60-day period, we would be trying to determine, through a series of meetings, what is in the best interests for the residents of Tigard. We did not offer a clear process or a resolution of the issue, but thought we would wind up meeting with ( each board at least once during this 60-day period. -2- The Metzger Water District will be considering the delay of its proposed merger with Wolf Creek during its meeting on February 21. Metzger Water Dist1-ict also let us know that they exacted certain conditions as a result of this merger which would protect local interests. For example, at least two members of the board would be from the Metzao-- are;-wi_ The name of the district would be changed to Tualatin v i.-- lY Water District. Ray indicated he would supply me with a of the conditions resulting from their negotiations. c : Mayor Eck h Ed Murpi,r John Acker "J FEB z 6 7991 March 7, 1991 Hearm PROPOSAL NO. 2906 - WOLF CREEK HIGHWAY WATER DISTRICT & METZGER WATER DISTRICT - Merger Petitioners: Wolf Creek Water Dist. and Metzger Water Dist. Boards 120th Day: May 28, 1991 The proposed merger of Metzger Water District with and into the Wolf Creek Highway Water District is a significant major boundarh change. It involves the largest water purveyor in the state next to the City of Portland. The merger deals with two out of five water districts serving the urbanized portions of Washington County. In addition to the five water districts there are several cities, (Forest Grove, Cornelius, Hillsboro, Beaverton, Tualatin and Wilsonville) that purvey water within east Washington County. There has been growing interest in restructuring the region's water supply system, either on a regional or a subregional basis. The approach taken in this merger analysis and decision will have precedential effects on the approach taken in subsequent proposals. The staff feels it is important to assure that the decision be based on thorough examination of the facts and that the rationale for the decision be carefully considered. The Boundary Commission had determined to invite interested parties to provide information to the Commission on regional water system issues before the Wolf Creek/Metzger merger proposal. was submitted. (This special meeting on water service issues is scheduled for March 2, 1991.) Because of the time that it, takes to do a thorough analysis on this proposal and because the meeting previously scheduled on the general issue of regional water service issues may assist in preparing the staff analysis, the Boundary Commission staff will not be able to finalize its staff report prior to the March 7th public hearing on this proposed merger. With concurrence of the Commission Chair the staff recommends continuance of Proposal 2906 to the April 4, 1991 public hearing. l Proposal 2906 - Page.1 17 S2 s t ~S` x Wolf Creek Highway U Water District 1850 SW 1701h Ave. • F.O. Box 745 • Baaverlon. Oregon 97075.5031642-1511 • Fax 649-2733 ~0E3VED FEB 25 CITY OF TICARD February 19, 1991 Ray Pirkl Chairman of the Board, Metzger Water District Dear Ray: We have received a copy of Robert Santee's letter regarding Wolf Creek Management style and financial conditions plus other allegations. I have always worked under the philosophy that if you cannot be constructive about an organization than say nothing. I find it appalling that Mr. Santee would write such a derogatory letter. I feel that.some of the allegations should be clarified. In my opinion Wolf Creek has been a leader in the Water Industry. Both myself and the members of my staff have served on many committees. I bring this up because we haves been recognized locally and nationally for a dedicated service. I am very proud of the work of both Staff and Employees of Wolf Creek. As far as bloated Staff, Wolf Creek has its own Engineering Section. Very little engineering is done by outside consultants. Our Engineering Staff has the capabilities of designing reservoirs, transmission, and distribution system. We are currently installing a CAD system - computer aided design which will further enhance our capabilities for designing and drafting software. Our Maintenance and Construction section employ some of the best workers in the Water Industry. We have the capabilities of installing new lines and maintain the system at the least possible cost. For example our current ;cater loss is under 5% with a utilities average of 12%. Our Distribution and Water Quality section maintain our system in addition our Water Quality Technician is up to today's standards in monitoring EPA rules and requirements. WATER - nr ' to be token for granted The Finance and Customer Service section has also been performing with excellency. In our Finance department we are staffed with qualified professional employees. We currently. manage Investments in excess of $20,000,000 which we monitor on a daily basis. All Budget and Financial reports are prepared in accordance with general excepted accounting principals. We invite you to talk to Chuck Swank, partner of the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche about our. Finance Department. The staffing of Wolf Creek is a total of 47 employees. We currently have 4 staff positions and 43 employees. There are 9 departments, and we would be happy to share our organizational chart with you. In addition to the bloated Staff, Mr. Santees makes reference to our high indebtedness and a desire to impose our inefficiency to others. Our current bonded indebtedness as stated is 14,800,000 as it appears in our 6/30/90 Audited Financial Report. Mr. Santee has misquoted our indebtedness by including interest to the year 2005. What-Mr. Santee does not address is that Wolf Creek's bond rating by Standard and Poors and Moodys is AA and Al respectively. This is reflection in the Bonds Sale of 1989 which our rate was 6.6232 and 1991 of 6.77 with lower yield. If Wolf Creek is mismanaged, why would we get a low interest rate with a higher bond rating. Both S&P and Moodys do an extensive financial and organizational review before classifying for bond rating. The water issue of supply has been a long standing concern of ours. Prior to 1980 Wolf Creek 'looked at several alternatives. We have studied the Columbia River, Scroggins Dam, the Willamette River and wells. Wolf Creek has done planning of source and decided to contract with Portland on a long term basis, a 25 year contract was signed in 1979. In addition to the 25 year contract we entered into a gravity line agreement that is capable of delivery 60 MGPD with a potential increase to 80/90 MGPD with improvements. We are continuing to study this source problem, and the Willamette River is still a potential source. We have worked with Metzger with the possibility of increasing the supply from Bull Run, and a possible joint venture with Forest Grove, Hillsboro and Beaverton was also considered. r You should be aware that we have a water supply to the year 2000 and have been able to supply'-water to the ever growing Sunset Corridor without disruption of service to other areas. This has been made possible by pro-active management of long range planning. The Water Authority has been a joint effort by both Districts with benefits to both District's rate payers. If Mr. Santee is truly concerned about regional Water Supply and distribution, then Mr. Santee should be advising Tigard Water District to join Metzger and Wolf Creek in forming a Water Authority. The merger of both districts is not something that developed overnight, but has been discussed along with the Water Authority. It is my belief that both district and it's rate pa r would benefit in a period of time. Gene Sefbel Administrator / GS/pf OFFICE 245-3331 Water it precious M E T Z G E R WATER DISTRICT Water not waste it 6501 S.W. TAYLORS FERRY ROAD atyour service PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 Jerry Edwards, Mayor City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 February 16, 1991 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Oregon Dear Jerry, Thank you for hosting the meeting today between the City of Tigard, the Tigard Water District and the Metzger Water District. While I am not sure how much was accomplished, I did note with some concern that there are several misunderstandings regarding the proposed merger of the Metzger and the Wolf Creek Highway water districts. As you know we have been striving for over a year and a half to form a water authority, knowing full well that an authority would eliminate both Metzger and Wolf Creek Highway water districts, create a newly elected board, etc. The whole idea was to create a totally new entity with the idea of regionalizing water either as to source and/or distribution so that long term water needs could be met more efficiently. The city of Tigard along with every other city and water purveyor in Washington County were invited to participate. The staff and boards of both districts made over 100 presentations regarding the authority. Our records indicate we met.with you, members of the council or the city manager on several occasions to seek your participation. But, no city or other water district was interested in participating. Believe me, it was not that we did not try in every way possible to inform you of our intent. Nor at anytime did we hide anything from anyone. Our goal was to dissolve our two districts, to form a new authority, along with anyone else who was interested, and nothing more. Perhaps the concept of two districts dissolving with all current board members being eliminated and encouraging the formation of a totally new regional authority with a newly elected board was somehow too incredible to be believed. But, that is exactly what we proposed with no strings and no hidden agendas. We still have a firm belief that a regional water authority is needed if we are to meet the future needs of Washington county, including the city of Tigard, in an organized manner. As a result of that belief and finding that we had no support from other cities or districts both Metzger and Wolf Creek Highway Water districts decided to merge and form a totally new water district. Both boards adopted resolutions and agreements under which the new district would be formed. Neither district wanted to be simply absorbed by the other. What we wanted was an { entirely new water district based along the lines of the proposed authority. The agreement includes the following: 1. Even though Wolf Creek is over 5 times the size of Metzger both boards agreed that Metzger would have 2 members on the new board to represent the current water users in Metzger. 2. A new title will be given the new entity. It will be called The Tualatin Valley Water District. 3. The current Metzger Office will remain open to provide localized service to the current Metzger customers. 4. All current employees of both districts will be placed in the new district. (Note: We do see the number of employees being reduced through retirements, resignations, etc.) In addition to the above it was agreed that Jess Lowman, the current manager of Metzger, will become the Director of operations for the newly formed district. You have indicated several times how you have come to depend on Jess and so has the Metzger Board. We are very proud that Jess will fill that very important role in the new district. He is a man of integrity and is highly regarded by his peers. In his new capacity he will still be available to you as he has been in the past. Someone at the meeting stated that they did not think we in the Tigard/Metzger area ought to be looking to west Washington t County for water but that we should concentrate just on the east county for water-sources. Our board does not agree with that premise. It is our belief that we need to look at all sources of water and to become involved in any and all of them. Incidentally, Wolf Creek has an interconnect with the Hillsboro consortium as a backup source and is currently in discussions with them to become part of that consortium. One of the original ideas within the formation of the water authority was to tie together all sources and make them available to every one. We believe that we need to look at our region as a source and not limit possibilities in any way. Everyone, including the city of Tigard, benefits from that kind of approach. I am terribly sorry about the confusion the letter from Bob Santee has caused you and the council. I believe that was the intent of the letter. As you noted at the meeting the Chairman of the Tigard Water District made it fairly clear that Bob Santee did not represent in any way the Tigard Water District. Inasmuch as the letter was sent, I am enclosing a letter from Gene Seibel of Wolf Creek Highway Water district which gives some facts regarding their district. Your perception about the movement toward regionalization in the Portland metropolitan area is accurate. There was a great deal of discussion about it prior to measure 5, but now it has 1 taken on an even greater importance in some people's mind since l measure 5. Metro has been discussing regional water, the city of Portland is discussing it, the boundary commission is interested in it, and our board believes in it. I believe as you do that regionalization will occur in a number of governmental areas over the next few years and not just with water. In closing, I would like to point out that the proposed merger between Metzger and Wolf Creek is not simply a merger of Metzger with Wolf Creek. As you can see from the plan the Metzger Water District service area was of prime concern to both merging districts. It was planned with board representation from Metzger for continued excellent service in the Metzger area including staff assignments and responsibility. We have taken a very responsible step in seeking to serve you better and to form a larger agency with the goal of providing you long term sources of water through pooling of resources. It would seem to me that the interest of the City of Tigard would not be in who provides water but that long term sources of water be provided. The goal of the proposed merger is to do just that. Thank you again for the meeting and the opportunity to discuss the merger. Sinc , Ray. Pirkl, C airman Metzger Water District Board of Commissioners L rafl"11-T1 RLOTIN SCt OUL ®tST I T 23J ENT Tm E~TIf ~EOIIi~iT`1( RESI®EIeiTItIl. iN1['R t /3/9 t pate Development Mountain Ridge, NE of 121 st and Gaarde 70 Number of Units: t1ugte- Family 161 13 ~ [4j [ of Adjusted School t impact Capacity Requiremen [ l1 121 Current Impact of this &5? Develo went (sum of columns 4 School Actual Available Prior Approved Ca SO Develo ments Design Ca acit Enrollment -30 340 70 1040 600 630 Elementary 1 157 Mary Woodward ;25 10 922 -22 900 Intermediate 5 1733 _?4 189 (Fowler Jr. High) 146 IS 1~J Nigh School (Tigard Sr High) For explanation of columns 1through see code on back sheet. Status of School Impact „A„ School(s) capacity not exceeded (column 6 less than column 1 ,~rtable additions ~chool s) capacity exceeded-core fen t}~ of Un form!Bu g Code rider and/pr' City County codes. S, ( 5•}fticjency determined by reaairem ' eeded--cure facilities insufficient !.o onsider p rtabl adduct sh Additional school(s) capac~t~ .xc capacity may be provided by other options under considound. r by the SchoO ntment i~~n, and other housing options. atior,, rescheduled school year , Doundar`r' Vdcbsn~~ents, ~ja}Gle shifting, busing grade 1 - utilized face to underr-utilised facilities, future bond measures te•adi')g to ne~l tin S~;hoo1 C~istrict Administration Staff these options and statements have been prepared by T igard-T ua a . ~ ~ , im pact statement is for t!-~e above indicated development, and is valid for 120 ' ays and approved by the Board of pi rectors. This ,chC1ol f Signed E.u-i Hillman of Ooer6tionS and Transport.~Oon (684-22L'' 1_ mom IMPACT STATEMEIST CODE Column 1 School capacity reflects the number of classrooms, portables on site, and Special Education program accomodations at an individual school. Column 2 Actual current school enrollment-kindergarten has been computed at one-half. Column 3 Current available capacity-difference of column 1 and column 2. Column 4 Impact of previously approved developments - determined by School District housing formula (see School District Housing Formula shown below) Column 5 Impact of requested development - Determined by School District housing formula. Column 6 Adjusted school capacity requirement determined by the sure of columns 2,4 and 5 - and places developmental request in A. B or C category SCHOOL DISTRICT HOUSING FORMULA SCHOOL DESIGN CAPACITY CURRENT ENROLLMENT AS OF 2/21 /91 Single Family Dwellings Tigard High School 1465 1533 Tualatin High school 1465 NOT YET CONSTRUCTED 0.48 Pre-first grade children prr dwelling Fowler Junior High 900 927 s 0.32 Elementary students per dwrelling Twal i ty Junior High 900 918 0 14 Intermediate students per ,welling Hazalbrook Middle Sch. 800 NOT YET CONSTRUCTED 0.07 High school students per dwelling Bridgeport Elem 600 633 0.53 Total school age students per d•.rellinq B;,rom Elem. 1300 631 =:FT Elem. 570 486 Multinlejamily Dwellings Jurharri Elem. 375 377 i Matzger Elem. 550 535 4- 0.07 Elementary students per &-velling Phil Lewis Elem. 500 42'7 0'Z Intermediate students per dwelling Templeton Elem. 510 608 0 0.02 High school students per d:IPll;.,y i uaIat ir, Elam. 6r:0 605 a 0 12 Total school age students per d,frr,Iling r1arvWnodrvard Elern 00 647 TOTAL 8170 8327 Include, 70 1A% student; C-U UW C" L ~J 1!5,Vu& F E S 46 1991 March 7, 1991 Hearvg PROPOSAL NO. 2906 - WOLF CREEK HIGHWAY WATER DISTRICT & METZGER WATER DISTRICT - Merger Petitioners: Wolf Creek Water Dist. and Metzger Water Dist. Boards 120th Day: May 28, 1991 The proposed merger of Metzger Water District with and into the Wolf Creek Highway Water District is a significant major boundarh change. It involves the largest water purveyor in the state next to the City of Portland. The merger deals with two out of five water districts serving the urbanized portions of Washington County. In addition to the five water districts there are several cities, (Forest Grove, Cornelius, Hillsboro, Beaverton, Tualatin and Wilsonville) that purvey water within east Washington County. There has been growing interest in restructuring the region's water supply system, either on a regional or a subregional basis. The approach taken in this merger analysis and decision will have precedential effects on the approach taken in subsequent proposals. The staff feels it is important to assure that the decision be based on thorough examination of the facts and that the rationale for the decision be carefully considered. The Boundary Commission had determined to invite interested parties to provide information to the Commission on regional water system issues before the Wolf Creek/Metzger merger proposal. was submitted. (This special meeting on water service issues is scheduled for March 2, 1991.) Because of the time that it takes to do a thorough analysis on this proposal and because the meeting previously scheduled on the general issue of regional water service issues may assist in preparing the staff analysis, the Boundary Commission staff will not be able to finalize its staff report prior to the March 7th public hearing on this proposed merger. With concurrence of the Commission Chair the staff recommends continuance of Proposal 2906 to the April 4, 1991 public hearing. s Proposal 2906 - Page .1 pOpUUiION INFO 9/1/1989 UEYELOPMENTS AND THEIR EFFECT ON TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT [7Wr TO a?xavarur£[~J••FR TUALATIN EST pppULA7tON t AS OF 2/20/91 Qds"AAO, At. TUALATIN CERTIFIED POPULATION 13,340 TOTALS FOR ALL SCHOOLS CIiVCf71GARDCONTACT-DUANER09ERTS TUALATIN DERS PER HOUSEHOLD ZS @PRT- 89 METZ- 6 W000- 407 TIGARD EST COpt,LAT10N 27222 DYROM- 63 PHIL- 20 FOWLER- 243 CI"' r4' TUALATIN CONTACT-MIKE MCFILLIP 1 TIGAROCERTIFIEDPOPULATION 25510 CFT- 129 TEMP- 106 TWALITY- 124 TIGARDpERSONSPER HOUSEHOLD 223 pUR- 28 TUAL- 0 SR HI- 194 NEW ST20ENT TOTAL ELEM. 84, GflflN9 TOTNI- 1409 CPA PROJECT PROJ. CONTACT ADp14. ADO.ELEM. ADDIT. MID SCH. AOO.HI SOH. START COMP. INFO ppD IECT NAME NUMBER DEYELOPER ARCH. PHONE 1 UNITS STUDENTS STUDENTS STUDENTS DATE DATE LOCATION UP DATED I ARROWFEAU '-S- i - IS-D RICHARDELMER HARRIS M: 692-4896 22 HOMES BRAT 704 TWA 308 154 Feb-90 Jan-91 HAZELTiR00Ktt ISTH Jan-91 2BRIANPARK2ARTS AR-d9-36 NOR THL AM HOME S INC. DOUGPOLLOCK 16 ARTS BPRT 112 TWA 046 032 Feb-87 Dec-90 9720 SW TUALATIN ROAD Jan-91 3 CENTURY ESTATES 151-t4C8 OR AK CORD RYDELL 538-5700 58 HOMES BPRT 18515 TWA &12 406 Feb-41 Ma 92 HASELBROOK/EAST OF 105TH an-91 4FO)(HILLPARK 3 DC'NFOURNIER ALPHA 297-1458(NICK HOSE) 54 HOMES BPRT 1728 TWA 756 378 A Bc Dtt-91 NYBERGEASTOFSTONESTHROW Jan-91 5JEFFWOCDESTATES3 STOLZE3ASSOC. WESTLAKE 62D-7800 20 HOMES BERT 640 TWA 26 140 Feb-90 -91 TUALATIN ROAD BY GOLF COURSE I kW-9I 6 JEFFWOOD ESTATES 4 51OLZE b ASSOC WESTLAKE 620 7800 15 HOMES BPRT 4 80 TWA 2.1 105 Nov-90 Nov-92 103RD BETWEEN HZLBRKtTUAL RD Jan-91 7MARICOPA 2SI-1500 DOUBLE 0 DEVELOPMENT WAXER 643-9410 44 HOMES BPRT 19.08 TWA 616 308 FLlb-91 May-92 TUALATIN ROAD BYHAZELBROOK EeA-90 8 HAZELBROOKMEADOWSJRIV CR 2 w-89-29 NORSE PROP IMIC OTAY: 206-694-2390 1122 ARTS BPRT 854 TWA 366 244 JM-90 Jul-91 17515 SW 115th. Seo-90 9TAWASACOURT S-V-14CC KATEDEVELLERS HARRIS MC.639-3453 8 HOMES BPRT 256 TWA 112 0% S -90 Au-9i 103RD BETWEEN HZBRK[TUAL90 Jar, 9i 10 TUAL.RIYERESTATES+i_ 21-Et9 OR-AK C•JRP RYOELL 538-5700 23 HCMES BPRT 736 TWA 322 161 tipv9G Se-91 CHEEAPEAKEOR JUST NOP BPTSCH A.,-9G' SW HEIY~ES DRIVE/COURT I Jan-91 11 11 rEOGE$CREEP. _ i 58b4-9G IJC REEVES 1 56 HOMES BYROM 17.92 TWA 784 392 1 Jul-89 Se -91 i2 DAKOTA HILLS T3 WAKER 643-9410 4I HOMES BYRCM 1312 TWA 574 257 Feb-91 Feb-92 ,EAST OF NEW HIGH SCHOOL Oct-90 13 M7r RTINAZZI VILLAGE(MEADOWS) 1 95 ARTS BYROM 665 TWA 285 19 Fib-90 806D Sw AVERY ' Iq MOI;DASIrJ RUN 2S-i-35A TEP.RY GOLDBECK HARRIS M: 635-0847 22 HOMES BYROM 704 TWA 308 154 1 F b-90 Dec-91 JJSTSO'JTHOFBYRWOFFBOONSFP Jan-91 It IS TUALATINWOCGS CENTURY 21 ALPHA 97-1458(NICK HOSE) 58 HOMES BYROM 1856 TWA 812 406 .Xn-90 Dec-92 NORWOOD/WEST OF 15 4Y q1 -GI 16 BEDFORDPARY: 251160 ALTASCHUBERT ALPHA 297-1458(NICK HOSE) 29 HOMES CFT 928 FOW 406 203 Feb-90 Dec-91 131ST/140OFTSOFFISLHERQO Avy i 17 BRADLEY WOWS I 89-15-5 TOM MILLER BUILDER MILLER 639=9511 131 HOMES CFT 9.92 FOW 4.34 217 Sep-89 Dec-90 131ST [JUST S _Y FISCr. RD Oct-90 18 BRADLEY WOODS2 89-575-5 TOMMILLER MILLER 63v--9511 29 HOMES CFi 926 FOW 406 203 Mar-90 rlw-91 iT-IST/800'SOFFIS-HERRD Apr-9O 199RACLEY'A^x053 90-306-S TOM MILLER 639-3511 .30 HOMES CFT 960 FOW 42 210 S -90 S -91, 131 ST AM FIE' HEP P0.4D AprSG I x-T-91 20FVRESTCNE x-89-12 MILTONFYRE BLSJTON GAN639-6116 IB HOMES CFT 576 FOW 252 1 * f!C-90 Dtt-41 1215TbTIPPET 121 LAKE OF NORTHDAY.OTA ZAROSINSKI-TATONE 235-8795 75 HOMES CFT 2400 FO'W )OS 525 Apr-91 Apr-93 N SIDE OF DAKOTA AT 109TH JM-9t 22 MORNING HILLS /8 ON FOURNIEP ALPHA 297-1458 (NICK H)SE) 30 HOMES CFT 9.60 FOW 42 210 Jan-90 Dec-91 131ST / 65OFT S OF F18Ct£F_ RD Jart-91 123 MtOLJNTAINGO!`JTE ~'J-`%011 OL"MPIC HOMES BURTON DAN 939-6116 79 HOMES CFT 2528 FOW I1 06 553 Jan-91 Sep-91 NW OF 121ST ANOGAARDE Oct-St 1 124NODAKACRES I 90-OC'03 "ILEk HAkRISMY_ 625-6562 7 Hr"ES CFT 224 FOW 098 049 Feb-90 Da-9t SSID-EOF NDAKOTA/!L`6TH CFT 160 1" 07 035 Nov-9G ",91 113CT JUST S OF Sw TIGARD ST ''S OL rN PAR i!Tt^N i `?-F' i'?-=t'1 ~LLO'^.10LSlYJ tiARP15 M'F: 639-3453 5 HOMES .h RIYcC'r0t.0!ac, S r T1,5 A--5 -54-31v I•-i-e-LEp rtCy MfJELLER 'MALr:ER A~3pC BE A': ,240 APTS CFi 1680 FOw 72 48 Jan-?G D?C-SI PAC HWY /FI.CHER P'.OAP SW TIGAAC ST MIN1I-%L ARTS 1 CBH10 252-14'5 76 ARTS CFT 532 For/ 228 1152 >ep-88 Jun-90 13 AfT C,rJM1 !;tuICMJ,3 I •C{_n*:!ar+!EP =lCt1.. 2`!7-IaS;(NICK M7SE1 14 HOMES OUR 1448 TWA 1.95 urib M-9U Jm-91 CITY OFOURFiAMOr"FBOONESFERRY ;c-8t -,9 CrALiNG F!RS fG1.lIN>639-5303 12 AFTS OUR 084 TWA 036 024 A 91 Jul-93 IB3+35 SW DURHAM k0A0 1 .~.n-21 1 Janvl 3;FARAAMESTAT;S2 MENPAULSON245-6039 3 APTS OUR 021 TWA 309 U06 rla-89 Mar-91 833S Sw DURHAM ROAD 1*' EfPHAit ROAD AP'S v i KENPAULSON 245-6540 12 APTS UU14 084 TWA 036 024 Nov-dd Mar-91 8355-8363 SW DURHAM ROAD 1 I I'_iPENAISSANCESt:•-Vi I IlEN~.i Alt=ECEv 224-4E63 43 HOMES OUR 1376 TWA 502 1,01 Apt-90 Feb-91 76TH AND ASHFORD ST Au'=)U 31 Er4A+<Sa•JCE•'Cr_OS: •i-C•~?: IkETUI-SAIi-EDEV : 2^4-4663 12 HOMES OUR 384 TWA 168 084 ~ A -91 Se -92 16THANDAS/fORDST _ 1 ,an-JI ?a TAMQA PAW 1HAkRISM_ '3' 1457 13 F4,(11ES UUk 416 1 TWA 182 09' Feb-90 Dec-91 15740 SW HALLEL"D m-91 I _ 7A'CATIA I a'• ,G-_-TL!T' IA',LIrA'f ~a HOMES' METZ 128 FOW 056 02.5 Feb-91 Feb-92 77TH AND LANDAU 1FERN~7CDCEvELLU+N• ?_ap6-MLF ERIi'rCfCCE'! 1I.J_ T H-fiE5 METZ 095 FOW 042 021 Am-70 Jun-91 80THt0AK 3 HCV-IE+ METZ 096 FOW 042 021 Mar?p ,AU:-91 .FINE1:51H 3i.~DAMJ "`t'F!_POA!J~~~ 0483%St 3a SIPELLE -F- 1'. _M 5EN CON- - ltt ! n-o 2'_, y 3 "PT 37' 2.'1 FGw 0'99 066 Fe6-J0 J~1~92 9670 HALL 8LYD I e ' t I MOON CPA PROJECT T PRO.! j - CONTACT- ADDIT !ADD FLEM -!ADDIT MID SCH AD9 HI SCHI START i COMP INFO 1 t PROJLiT NAME _ _ - Nt1MflER OCVELOPER ARCH. ""ONE ITS !6TUDENi; S-(UDFNIS SIUD E_NISI DATE DATF IOCAT ION •UP UATtU 111 ' l-W_DAI'QTL t• = Jim C-:;i CT E --L-_--.'1r V. Td Id 1 N .'fi = ~I - 4 HI f Pa I t +,'T-._-i ~a I FeF 7n J EU j H - - T_`---- - UH---- - 40 CR!T£R10N I T°r rFlFr AND 7214^ .41HALLSTPEETST 4?.Lt4 P4nL.iCItJ Deg 6zs 7'16 rA~T' I 'rl F t .z~- --e. u: ra--9i nar 92 HALL. N_C'F M°: C,G.y~~C a V1 42 nYJRE I r 4Nk' Tl 6`•'^9-M1'i s i 4Pi:. H!L - T - I'P - 0~: -~Mn.- y - _ f3C 4,1 . I HALL?LVL } FRALY v0- 1` M'_l RE _ ~6 _f_ 0 - 9 I _ IL F~ •w' I _ J '..'tf1-'. I .✓r 9: IS i)F ba~iliA R,7GG IN _ 143 FAZE tffAaJ~S - _ JIM PAZ: ra= . t:c=' 44 GROVES _-__r rs ~lC,rlt 1'it c L{y - - - 1--L'_ ;IS~L~ENi, n~7-u_Id+ 1 I: H:flc5 011 ,a rr.w 6_ :pA10Ts Atl;ivD'u Plr:-9C. 45ALDEP,LANE '-8~4-1a/•✓--jREEp~F.,¢'7rirj F'JPTON nzy-r;;6 I_Il Hi tic G--T TES: T'T-LA TE 1-~--^ Mir- NIi Au9-~21100TH'9'TH JUST N OF SA T TLER .tan-'dlti 45 CASiILERA~K --90-0011; JUMCAST,.E HARRIS IL~69e-a8;6 6 HOMES TEMP 192 I TWA Oba 1 04: -}~-ull--'0 --IIJ-m-92 +9'iHAVF°S OFI'IdCOCI~+++ID jar-Q1 47 COOK"DEVELOPMEt:T TERPY:GC+ %4^-U329 ! 7: 4p17 ?EMF' Ja TWA 16 ~ I 44 pr-;Q I i15C•01 Sw IQ9T.AVE I 4 dI0L4iHAM PLACE APARTMENTS ( 90-OU03 NELSON NELSON 238-5510 ARTS IE!iv 1+:CA TWA °4a SFr'-in Jua-~1 a 17TH I S Ot DUANAI' FORD Jan-u 49 GRANCIVIEW ACRES 90-OCn 17 KEIJ W4Y"!IRE &J, TON 1639-6116 IlU H;Ir It iEMF 3.) IVA~ 14 ?C Jul-90 Feb-921ES 9'TH:a00 FEET S OF MACD?NALD Jan-,I 50!LAUT',STERPACE 90-GvY4 RONALOLAVTT6_•0--'741, OEHAd` _692:450 ---T ' tiCXiES TFM: _~9 iW'A )'Y J4•~ = r-9Y A r-92 97TH AND SWRHO!1C-iC`1JR1 N6v-9l { 51 LITTLE BULL MTNARTS - CBH CC,:'-2-141p 13n, APTS TErt: 91'I I TWA -1t - Jun-:P !Jan-90 109TH6 MURU,CK 5'2 RI'/ERwlx)DE Ai£S _ 90-GOIa SEIRAPACIFI _J i MLP 90-002' - UTAI' 635-3C1: 89 HCt1E51 ,F.MF';2i 4; A '41 ^ A r-91 Ma -92 FOR 'i'4TH AND; OF D+:GH>M PO von-v+ 53 R.OVAL04tS i !i.a'tE5 T:MR ! 60 i TWA v? -I M5r-91 Mer-')-"S OF MROCi:E+ETwEEN!t;JTN,98TH Ort-40 54 SATTLER PARK -dS-10:GD 89CxIN FCJLeIE-- ALPHA 267-1458(NICF:"IS[1 18 HCtTLS iEnc 1 _761-1j *,vA r---i-' - dRr-~C 1 SP -97 ;l°•TN AND SATTLEF 55 SYCAMORETEkkACEARTS (WEST FELL 682-3003 gal APT, TFMF• 65?• TWA 282 IB-5 Ilan-9 109605WDURHAMRVAU 1 Jan-41 j 56 TIGARD APARTMENTS 9)-OCKT4 TRIAD TRIAD 205-575-9413 364APT; TEMP 2546 T'.,A 109: :2b 1 Ma-91 Mar-93 109TH/NAEVE ST Jan-91 ; 57BEACOIJHOMES 90=0GJ6 BEACOJHOtES ALPHA 297-1455(RCLARNO) 3 HCtMES T2 M' 096 TWA 042 021 JLn-90 Se-91 SAT TLERL95TH an-91 58 _AWEBUELL ZAROSINSKI-TATONE 235-8795 14 NrJMES WOOD 448 FOW 196 i 098 V A-41 Sep-1j2 BULL MIN RD tY 150TH 59 BEt4+:HVIEW NO .2 ON HOLD 46 ' HC(1ES WOOD I 1472 FC'w 644 3.2-' ON HOLD 132NDIS OF BENCHVIE'A ~Ma~-9rl I 60 BULL MTN. SUMMIT ESTATES 569-OS BUR TON INGINEEPING BURTON 639-6116 120 HOMES WC°GU 13840 FO4 168 640 ,Ian-90 Jul-92 135TH/ S OF FHP N ST I Jan-91 5I BULL MTN. SUMMIT ESTATES 2 SUB 90-0005 131X2T0N IN31NEERItJG BURTON 639-6116 276 HOMES 'WOOD 88321 POW 1 -`864 19,12 Jul-91 Jul-93 139TH /BULL MNi T_Jan791 62 CAPSTOI~FEBEAV. SCH DIST) SUB 90-0009 BEAVERTON SCti00L D15TkICi 16 PHOMES .AHr1-9U Jan-91 WINTER LAKE DR OFF 13STH Jul 00 63COl1NTRYVIEW 2SI9LOT~1100 51EVETJCA.RLITZ OTAK DAVE eANTZ 635- 3618 34 WOOD 1088 FOW 476 135 ON HOLD ON HOLD N SIDE OF BEEF BEND EAST OF I 37TH Jan-91 64 COUNTRY VIEW 2S19L0Tt11D0 STE'JEN f.ARL1T2 OTAK DAVE BANT2635-3618 IUF WOOD 756 FOa' 324 216 ON HOLD ON HOLD N SIDE OF BEEF BEND EAST OF 137TH Jan-vI 65 FRENCH PRAIRIE ESTATES 2 89-327-S DON FOURNIER ALPHA 297-1458(NICK HOSE) 26 WOOCI 832 FOW 364 182 Mar-90 Oct-91 SW 150TH/CABERNET Jan-91 W GRE£NWAYESTATES 90-121 THOMAS CHIN WEST CST 256-2070 12 WOOD 384 ROW 168 084 Jul-90 Jul-,)) 139TH SOUT H OFF BULL MTN PC Jan-91 ; 67Fi00pVIEWESTATES 90-00I5 TIMROiH KAMPE 635-6291 47 WOOD 1505 FO'W 658 L 329 ARr-91 A r-92 BTWN135THS132NDS9WALNUT Get-90 68 KING CITY HIGHLANDS RICHARDHOWSLEY PO BOXI086VANCWA 30 WOOD 960 F0'1 42 21V Mar-91 Ma,92 126TH N OF PEACHVALEST Oct-90 69 KIt1GSVIEW 2S19LOT 1200/1002 KAKBERER HOTEL SUP CO. OTAK DAVE BANTZ 635-3618 67 HOMES WOOD 21 44 FOW 938 4 69 Mar-91 Nov-92 N SIDE OF BEEF BEND /I37TH .,an-91 70 RxtT 114GATE3 HERITAGEDEV CO HHGJ 639-3339 39 HOMES WOOD 1,148 FO'W 546 273 Au -'?0 Mar-92 BJLL MTN AND PEACHTREE DP.IYE l Jan-91 1 71 MOEtJTAINRIDGE Cw OLD M-BDEVELOPMENT 6LAtTOt1 DAN639-6116 70 HOMES W000 2240 FOw 98 490 ON HOLD No/ OF 121 STANDGAARD' I Jan-91 72 rUR15SETTEVttLAf£laOrYEAR) PD 89-07 tMDRISSETTE OR-AK 62b-0098 190 FAP WOOD 5760 FOW 252 1.6.0 Feb-v0 JJn-95 SUMMER LAKE Mo' -90 73 OAKMCNT APTS. 89-259-0 WESTRIDGE CONST 124 W000 868 FO'W 3 72 248 Jan-90 Mor92 BEEF BEND / N OF MYRTLE Jan-91 74 SC,NC)MHS ORIONCUSTONHDMES ORION 629-9516 55 WOOD 1'60 FO'W 77 1 365 Feb-90 Dec-90 SW 146TH AND BULL MOUNTAIN RD Au -90 75 SPEEZA TL IOC 2S I BAA JOFN GODSEY GODSEY 646 4509 32 WD00 10.24 FOW 448 224 A -9i Se -92 EAST OF ISUTH ON BULL fINTN Jar-91 76 THREE MOUNTAIN ESTATES HERITAGEDEV,Co 639-3339 48 WOOL) 1536 FOW 572 336 Feb-91 Feb-92 NW OF SW 133P•D VALMT114 Jan-91 7'NOOOFORDESTATES B11P10N DAN 6396116 33 WOOD lUSfi FOW 462 231 Mar91 Mar92 133RD/BULLMJTN Jan-91 78 WOODHEEESTATES 2SI60D RAINTREEOEV. OTAK 8 57 WOOD 1824 FOW 7.98 599 Jan-90 Jun-92 150TH OFFBEEF BEND Jan-9I I 79 PLEASANT VIEW 2518 2400/2401 WESTERN PLAAfJING JUDY PIPKIN 294-0222 36 HOMES WOOD 1 1.52 FO'W 504 25: a -90 ,AaH-gt BULL MTN WEST OF I'OIH Jan-9I ' 4 ~rs~: a fac~la r Ci~~nc~ L (Sc lu,vl 0154- 1991-1993 FISCAL ESTIMATES 5C~-ss`w` 1991-92 1991-92 kIN 2-93 1992-93 ( REQUIREMENTS / RESOURCES PROGRAM RESOURCES GRAM RESOURCES IN MILLIONS $ IN MILLIONS ILLION S $ IN MILLIONS I PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM COSTS 38.4 44.2 ADDITIONAL PAYROLL COSTS 5.0 3.1 COSTS TO OPEN NEW SCHOOLS 0.0 3.7 OTHER BUDGET INCREASES 0.8 0.7 TOTAL SPENDABLE BUDGET 44.2 51.7 ' ENDING FUND BALANCE 33 0.0 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 47.9 51.7 PROGRAM RESOURCES TAX BASE FROM PRIOR YEAR 26.9 29.2 TAX BASE GROWTH (6X) 1.6 NONE TAX BASE INCREASE (VOTERS) 4.7 NONE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE" 0.0 3.7 STATE FUNDS FROM PRIOR YEARS 7.7 8.5 STATE FUNDS GROWTH (BSSF) 0.8 0.5 STATE LEVY REPLACEMENT 2.5 6.4 OTHER RESOURCES 3.7 3.4 TOTAL RESOURCES 47.9 51.7 Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J