Loading...
City Council Packet - 10/23/1989 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an } A REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item should sign on the appropriate H OCTOBER 23, 1989 5:30 PM sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, TIGARD CIVIC CENTER ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the EHi 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's H TIGARD, OREGON 972223 Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Administrator. 5:30 o COUNCIL WORKSHOP (5:30 p.m.) - Development Process - Community Development Staff 6:30 o STUDY SESSION - Discussion with Roy Rogers, Washington County Canmiissi.oner 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to order: City council and Local Contract Review Board; Poll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items 7:35 2. S1=ZU AMERICA CORPORATION - RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION NO. 89- 7 Mayor 7:40 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (TWO Minutes or Less, Please) 7.50 4. CONSENT AGENDA: these items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes: August 28, 1989 4.2 Local Contract Review Board: Authorize Request for Bids for Senior Center Remodeling 4.3 Approve Amendment to Existing Oregon State Highway Dept .Agreement- Hall/Burnham Intersection Improvements - Resolution No. 89- 4.4 Approve Appointment of Deputy Recorders to Act as City Recorder in Certain Circumstances - Resolution No. 89- 4.5 Approve Board and Camnittee Appointments - Resolution No. 89- 4.6 Approve Pro-Tem Judge Appointments - Res. Nos. 89- & 89- 4.7 Award Bid - Sale of Gaarde House f c COUNCIL AGENDA. - OCTOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 1 7: 55 5. FINAL ASSE -BM HEARING - S.W. 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DI.STRICr The purpose of this hearing is to consider written objections to the individual proposed assessments on properties within the SW 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. Only written objections will be considered. All written objections must have been filed with the City Recorder by 5:00 PM on October 23, 1989, at Tigard City Hall located at I 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard P. O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. All written objections must state specifically the grounds for the objections. o Final Assessment Hearing Opened o Declarations or Challenges o Summation by Community Development Staff` o Review of Written Objections Received o Recommendation by Community Development Staff . o Council Questions or Comments o Final Assessment Hearing Closed . o Consideration by Council: Ordinance No. 89- t f 8:20 6. PUBLIC HARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-07 ZONE CHANGE 89- 07 METZGER-EMS/ROCEWE L NPO #5 A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Ccmw=ial Professional to Medium-High Density Residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Commercial Professional) to R-25 E_ (Residential, 25 units/acre) for approximately 5 acres. LOCATION: West side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street (WCIM 2S1 1DB, Tax Lots 800 & 801, 2S1, 1DC, Tax Lot 3600). o Public Hearing Opened f. o Declarations or Challenges o Summation by Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Emmination o Recommendation by Cmm pity Development Staff o Council Questions or Comments F o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council EE~: k' 9:00 7. PUBLIC HEARING - CCKRO MSIVE PLAN AMNEME ]T CPA 89-08 ZONE CHANGE 89- 08 GRASS NPO #7 A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment froaia MediLnt►-High Density ~ Residential to Neighborhood Commiercial and a Zone Change from R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) to C-N (Commercial, Neighborhood) for approximately 1.9 acres. LOCATION: Southwest corner of the u intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th Avenue. (Waits 1S1 33CA, Tax Lot 100) o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations or Challenges o Summation by Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Crass E= ination i o Recommendation by Community Development Staff o Council Questions or Cmw exits o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council COUNCIL AGENDA - OCIOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 2 9:40 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and staff ~ 45 9. EXECUMVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (h), & (i) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues, and City Administrator's evaluation. 10:00 10- ADJOURNMENT cca1023 COUNCIL AGENDA - OCZOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 3 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MEET1NG MU!WrES - OCMEM 23, 1989 - 5:30 P.M. 1. ROM CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Joe Kasten (arrived at 6:30 p.m.), and John Schwartz. City Staff Present: Patrick Reilly, City Administrator; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Wayne Iaary (arrived at 6:25 p.m.), Finance Director; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder; Randall Wooley (arrived 6:25 p.m.), City Engineer. 2. CE14EN! PROCESS FX140" Community Development Director reviewed results of questionnaire regarding comments with the development process. Suggestions for changes included the following: o Posting Notices on Property for Land Use Changes o Buffering - Conditions on Types of Buffering Acceptable (i.e. Fencing Specifications; Requirements for Type and Height of Plantings) o Finances - Exactions: Systems Development Charges; Development / Fees. Review by City Attorney of new legislation affecting SDC t utilization must be impact of project only and cannot be used to cure existing community deficiencies. (City Engineer Randall Wooley and Finance Director Wayne Lowry arrived at 6:25 P.M.) 3. STUDY SESSION (Councilor Kasten arrived at 6:30 p.m.) a. Discussion with Roy Rogers, Washington County Commissioner Commissioner Rogers expressed a desire to set up a meeting with County Board of Commissioners and Tigard City Council. City Administrator will work with County officials to arrange an evening meeting after the first of the year. MSTIP/2 Review - Discussion of 10/18/89 letter received from Mr. Bruce Warner concerning project status. There was discussion on intergovernmental cooperation for projects. Tigard Council noted concerns with implementation of projects as promised. Commissioner Rogers explained the financing method; that is, the voters approved a serial levy which means funding for one-sixth of total projects would be available each year over the six years. COUNCIL MINN[TI'FS - OCTOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 1 Because two of the projects represented the majority of the funding and were scheduled early-on in the time schedule, it may be several years before some projects can be started. Commissioner Rogers advised legal counsel was reviewing the possibility of borrowing in advance (inflation vs. interest rates may make this a viable option) or interfund loans. Intergoverrmnental Cooperation - Commissioner Rogers asked Council to consider different levels of assistance with regard to urban area of interest. This was for preliminary discussion only, but may make sense from a service delivery standpoint. Council consensus was that this was a possible topic for a future meeting between Tigard and County officials. Three Main Subdivision - Cmmdssioner Rogers reviewed this issue which surrounded the neighborhood's concern that a turn-lane for school buses was not required of the developer of the Three- Mountain Subdivision on Bull Mountain. He advised in accordance with criteria available, including state law, a turn-lane was not warranted. He noted he believed the City and County response to the issue was correct. b. Agenda Review irxr o City Administrator reviewed Agenda Item No. 6. Public Hear Item for Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-07 Zone Chance 89-07 Metzger-EMS/Rockwell NPO #5: He advised that negotiations were underway between the neighborhood and the developer. A request for an extension was received. Council consensus was to set over the public hearing item to November 6, 1989. o Fee Waiver Request: City Administrator advised that a fee waiver request was likely to be received from NPO #3 concerning an appeal of a director's interpretation with regard to the placement of a manufactured home on Cook Lane. o Discussion on final assessment hearing for the 135th Local Improvement District: City Engineer reviewed the written objections suhutted. He referred to his October 23, 1989, memorandum which outlined two errors in the consultants' assessment =rpltation. He recommended that the City pick up the costs resulting from acknowledgement of the errors. I CX WCIL MNUTES - O=BER 23, 1989 - PAGE 2 o Non-AcLenda Item: City Administrator advised that he would present a non-agenda item; this was a resolution expressing support for Pak-Best's application for an Oregon business developanent fund loan- 4. sHnviIZU A!ffiiIC M 7 1 9 - ATIQ1 - Ir7L9CxL um QF 1siPPi~°~7ZQ1 NO. 89-79 Mayor read a Resolution of Appreciation to Shimizu America Corporation for their donation of a caVxter and printer to the Tigard Public Library. Motion by amicilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to adopt Resolution No. 89-79. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 5. PROCSAMMCN - Im IU3MM CAMPAIGN Mayor read a proclamation declaring October 22-29, 1989, as Red Ribbon week encouraging citizens to pledge: My Choice..... Drug Free. 6. VISITCRS AGENDA a. Susan Grossen, 10570 sW Park, noted concerns with a proposed traffic pattern on the Hudson property located at SI9 Watkins and Pacific Highway. she submitted a letter signed by 34 neighbors. Legal Counsel advised the developer must request the ammlchment to make this change since the appeal period for this development was closed. Jurisdiction would then be created for Council review of staff's recwmiendation. b. Herm Porter, NPO #3 Chairman, 11875 SW Gaarde, requested a fee waiver for the appeal of Director's interpretation concerning a manufactured hoarse on cook Lane. This appeal will be reviewed by the Planning Ca nission. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to waive the fee as requested. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 7. CCNSENr AGENDA 7.1 Approve Council Minutes: August 28, 1989 7.2 Local Contract Review Board: Authorize Request for Bids for Senior Center Remodeling 7.3 Approve Amendment to Existing Oregon State Highway Department Agreement - Hall/Burnham Intersection Tmorovements - Resolution No. 89-80 COUNCIL MIIJUI*ES - OCTOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 3 7.4 Approve Appointment of Deputy Recorders to Act as City Recorder in Certain Circumstances - Resolution No. 89-81 7.5 Approve Board and Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 89-82 7.6 Approve Pro-Tem Judge Appointments - Res. Nos. 89-83 & 89-84 7.7 Award Bid - Sale of Gaarde House Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present.. t 8. F3ML ASSESSMENT EaMMG - SW 135`IS AVENUE IDCAL IlR4=EME T DISMICT is OBDIl NO. 89-26 AN MI; F3ML OCST OF THE IN WE SW 135 AVENUE IDOL DTSUUCT, r APPO'laZONII~ TM COST AN= ME ffiNEF17M Pte, SPIMDINC' THE A. , DIRE1MMZ TM EN' W OF ASSESSKENM IN THE LMN DOCKET AND ~ SETTING TBE MRnMBST RAZE, AM EEaUU iG AN EKUWMNLY. The purpose of this hearing is to consider writ-ten objections to the individual proposed assessments on properties within the SW 135th Avenue Focal Improvement District. Only written objections will be considered. All written objections mist have been filed with the City Recorder by 5:00 p.m. on October 23, 1989, at Tigard City Hall located at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. All written objections must state specifically the grounds for the objections. k a. Final Assessment Hearing was opened b. Declarations or challenges: None C. Summation by Ccamunity Development Staff: C= wnity Development Director reviewed the area boundary included in the Local Improvement District. He gave a background of the LID which was formed in 1987. He summarized the 1987 formation of the LID. He stated that the road was constructed in 1988 with some final work r cmpleted in 1989. The final costs were calculated, and the assessment roll was prepared. He stated the final assessments were based on the traffic generation potential of each parcel in accordance with the 1987 ordinance. d. Review of Written Objections Received I Community Development Director stated that 23 written objections were received for the individual-proposed its on properties within the SW 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. City Engineer reviewed the objections submitted. In general, the following issues were noted: o Disagreement with the Bo u4ary of the LID. o Disagreement with the method of assessment. COUNCIL MINUIES - OCIOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 4 L' o New property owners noting they were unaware of the pending LID assessment. o Property owners on fixed incomes noting the assessment would present a hardship. He noted that when the billings were sent to senior citizens, information would be provided concerning a State program which allows for an assessment-deferral process. This information was also sent to those LID members who wrote letters of objection because of hardship based on fixed income. City Engineer reviewed corrections to be made to the assessment f roll which included: s 1. Parcel No. 323 is non-developable tract; assessment should be changed to $0.00. 2. Parcel No. 324 has been subdivided; new lots are 349-A and 349-E. Parcel No. 349, as shown on the roll, should be F { eliminated. City Attorney addressed the question of whether or not the City has an obligation to notify new property owners of the LID assessments. He stated that the City was required by statute and ordinance to send a notice only at the initiation of the process and at the time the assessment was imposed. r. He reviewed legal remedies available to property owners s.. to the assessment. In the situation where property was objecting and there was a failure to disclose the existence of the potential assessment, the property owner should seek 1 r' egal advice as to whether there would be an option of going back against the seller of the property. He suggested that the property owner may have the Y; right of rescission if the financial impact of the assessment would have influenced the purchase of the property. e. Council Questions or Comments: Councilor Schwartz reviewed a letter from one property owner who questioned why Scotts Bridge Drive had not been improved. He requested clarification of the street improvement boundary. City Engineer advised the street was a tenporary connection between the improved LID area and the area which was to be built when developed. f. Recommendation by Conmanity Development Staff: City Engineer stated staff rimed adoption of the Final Assessment ordinance with the following corrections: COUNCIL MOOS - OCMBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 5 1. The assessment roll be corrected to delete Parcel 349, which is a duplication of 349-A and 349-E; and changing the assessment of Parcel 323 to $0.00 as an undevelcpable parcel; 2. Correcting the final LID costs to $615,041.28; and 3. Noting in Item No. 6 that there were 23 property owners who filed an objection. g. Final Assessment Hearing Closed. h. Consideration by Council: Notion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt ordinance No. 89-26 with the corrections as noted by the City Engineer; in addition, Item No. 6 of the proposed ordinance should be completed to indicate that 23 property owners filed written objections. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 9. PUBUC HEARTW3 - PLAN ANTI' CAA 89--07 DC CIMNGE 89- i 07 MKVZGR-ENS/I :L NPO #5 j The public hearing was set over to November 6, 1989. t ( 10. PMUC EEARTNG - PIM !P CPA 89-08 zIJNE a vim 89- 4 08 Qm6S r' A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium-High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and a Zone Change from R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) to C-N (Coimnercial, Neighborhood) for approximately 1.9 acres. VOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th Avenue. (MM 1S1 F 33CA, Tax lot 100). a. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges: None C. Summation by Ctumwnity Development Staff: City Engineer displayed a map of the subject property. He stated that the proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 3, 1989. At that time, the Commission considered testimony from the public and reviewed the staff report. He reported staff recommended denial because of traffic issues. E 'Tile increased traffic density was of concern to Washington County, 4 the State Highway Department, and NPO #7. He stated that a secondary concern, factored into staff's recommendation, was related to the state-mandated housing goal. He COUNCIL KDWTES - 0C•IUMR 23, 1989 - PAGE 6 reviewed the target for undeveloped, residentially zoned land in the City was to allow for an average density of 10 units per acre. This proposal would reduce the inventory of high-density residentially zoned land slightly and would, therefore, reduce the average the City was oommitted to keep. d. Public Testimony: Prc~onents - none O,~ponents John Boylan, Chairperson NPO #7, 11844 SW Morning Hill Drive, Tigard, Oregon 97223, voiced concerns over traffic and population- density levels. He further tented that properties at Scholls and SW North Dakota and at Scholls and the proposed Murray Boulevard extension were already zoned C-N (Canrexcial, Neighborhood); and that these properties, if developed as zoned, would sufficiently service the area without further zoning of this type in the area. e. Rooonmendation by Cm munity Development Staff Staff recmumended that Council uphold the Planning Cmmissions's decision to deny Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. f. Public hearing closed E. g. Consideration by Council Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to uphold the Planning Commission recant' endation based on the findings outlined in the staff report. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 11. NCH"AGENOA IMM a. City Administrator outlined the request by Pak-Best, Inc., 17333 SW Bonita, for a resolution of support with regard to an application for an Oregon Business Development Fund loan. He said staff reOCelmmended Council adopt the resolution; such action would represent an endorsement only at would not put the City at risk. RESOLUTION NO. 89-85 - A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REQUESRTING THE EMNCKIC DEVMD ME{U COMMISSION AND TM STATE OF OREGON TO ASSIST IN THE MANCING OF THE PAK-BEST, INC., PRWMT. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt Revolution No. 89-85. The motion passed by a unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCIL MINCnW - OCTOBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 7 12. EXBOUMM SESSICN: The Tigard City Cm=il went into Executive Session at 8:19 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (h), and (i) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. 13. ADJOUPNKW: 8:40 p.m. t, 4. APRINM by the Tigard City Council on No v e m bw a U , 1989. r ine Rieatley, City Recordbr i i f 7t 4ef G -ACay6f - Cityof i , Recordirxj Secretary: Ellen Fox cP/CDWCCM]1 H: \WDRD\CIIMW\ F; t' E l s COUNCIL NHTI M - OCNBER 23, 1989 - PAGE 8 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6390 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED C~. • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice OCT 2 0 19 P.O. BOX 23397 89 • Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit City OFTIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ass. I, Alice Muirden being first duly sworn, depose and sa that I the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the I i gar~~ i mes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at T, gard in the aforesa'd county apd state; that the Pubic Hearing a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: October 12, 1989 Subscribed and sworn before me this 13th of October, 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Commissi 6/9/93 -xpires; AFFIDAVI PUBLIC`I'EARINCT' r 2` The following w' d by the .'T Cuy Ca tober. 23, 1989, at .m.at Tfgaid Cmcr'es~Ler, Town; 13125 SW'~ll Bo ,'Iigmtd,'tk~eg~t ~FurtLet inf y~ y obYauer{the Comi»unty,Development Darecwr°or City a4 the,sarne:, Wotion of by calling 639=4171. You are ib:Vited to:submit wttr ten testimony; in;advance-of,,the public hearing wnuen d ara]desti . ody.; will be considered at the hearing publichearing,v~nll btu Aron dcteii m accordance With the applicable Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard ~vlunicilw Code and any rules of procedure adopted`bY,,the Counciland-available at city Hall COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT :CPA ' 89-07 .614t .-CHANM ZC 89-07 ¢ ME-MER EMS%ROCKWELL NPO #5 A re4uest for a Compnrhen= save Plan Amendment from"(Commercial Professional) to Medmm-o hl, Detistty~Mresidengal 'aitd a Zone Change from C P °(Commereial.Prs-+ -scanal)~~to~"R-25 (Residenn9l` 25, un~rsJacre) for avnat~ely, 5 aetcs; LOCATION:. West ode Of'S1W'I~~dhA~e€iue°` ~~3~~~~i'°~`d~ffotbet anti sw ~~r.sirt; ~2S~s ~ x r, ~ ` COMPItEHl~N5ZV~ _ 'ZC ff9=i)&;G r SNI~O ; CHANGE A nyqucst fofr Dt sity, Kesi... f . or tine intersec#ioi TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY legal 7-6395 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ~ E~VED 1 • • ❑ Tearsheet Notice City of Tigard O Cr 2 3 • P.O. Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 1989 Tigard, OR 97223 giporAFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' I, A] ice Mu i rden being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the T i gard T i mes a newspaper of general circulation ads defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at i gar in the aforesaid county and state; that the ity Council Meeting a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: October 19, 1989 ~~JOd j2 SubscribVand rn to before m this 20th of October 1989 Notary Public for Oregon My Comm i S. 6/9/93 AFF IDAVIT Ine touowing selected,a 8a".his are your orniahod_t. _ Further information- and fill,- agendas may ife obWned from 'the' , itiyy ' Recorder, 13125 S.W. Ha11.Boulevard,.TigW, Oregon 97223, or W, call- ing 639-4171. CITY COUCIL REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 23, 1989 5:30 PM. WORKSHOP; 6:30 PM STUDY SESSION; 7:30 PM BUSI- NESS MEETING TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, TOWN HALL . 13125 SW'HALL BOULEVARD,'TIGARD OREGON • Council Workshop = Development-Process Review' • Study Session- Discussion with, Roy Rogers, .Washington County Commission • Resolution of Appreciation'- Shimizu America Corporation. Local Contract; Review Board _ Final:Assessment Hearing '-r S.W 135th Avenue Local Im iovement.District Publk:Hearings , - Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89 07 Zone Change 89-07, Metzger-EMS/Roclavell NPO #5 Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-08, Zone Change 89-08, Gross; NP0 #7:L Executive Session -;undertlto proy➢sons of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), (h), & (i) to discuss iaboc, relations, Heal pro~etty,.;ttansacfions, ii>t~nt ~ pending hligation isS1 1(l Ccty~~k tot's s ` evaluation` - ^'Y ~ ~ ~ 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I, PZX-g-, :33%kAIA being first duly sworn, on oath, dep a and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 5-'/ 3 L c, 0, which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated /o a 3/8 copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being. hereto et attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the Q `1 day of 0 Q~ , 1989. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and S.W. Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this .,,=-day of [cif-~.cpr 19 Notar ublic for Oregon My Commission Expires: - - ~~j i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 89-_~ AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SW 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, APPORTIONING THE COST AMONG THE BENEFITED PROPERTIES, SPREADING THE ASSESSMENT, DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET AND SETTING THE INTEREST RATE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. I The Council finds: 1. The SW 135th Avenue Local Improvement District was formed and the ' improvements directed to be made by ordinance No. 87-51. 2. The improvements have been made in accordance with the final engineering report adopted by Resolution No. 89-78. The report contains a proposed assessment roll. 9-1p15 c4r,as 3. The total final cost is the sum of ~,-eo98 and the assessments against the individual properties are as set forth in the assessment roll and the Council finds that each property is specifically benefited in the stated amount. 4. Notice of the proposed final assessments was directed to be given by Resolution No. 89-78. 5. Individual mailed notice of the proposed assessment for each property was mailed to each property owner on October 12, 1989. The notice advised the property owner of the opportunity to object in writing to the proposed assessment and that written objections would be considered at a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Tigard Times on October 12 and October 19, 1989. The public hearing was held on October 23, 1989. 6. oZ property owners filed written objections. The Council considered these objections. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: & rs', Ck11 . a s Section 1: The final total cost of $6-t6-,,86x98- shall be assessed against the individually benefited properties as apportioned in the attached assessment roll entitled "City of Tigard, S.W. 135th Avenue L.I.D. Final Assessment Roll" and dated October 2, 1989. Section 2: The Finance Director shall mail an assessment notice to each property owner and the notice shall state the amount of the assessment which is due immediately and that applications may be made to make installment payments; such applications shall be reviewed by the Finance Director for eligibility. ORDINANCE NO. 89-a Page 1 T Section 3: The Finance Director is directed to enter each benefited property and the amount of the assessment against the property as shown on the Final Assessment Roll for S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District dated October 2, 1989, in the lien docket of the City separate from other prior Or subsequent assessments and the same E shall constitute a lien against each respective property and bear the interest rate of the net effective interest rate of the bond t at the time of the bond sale plus a two percent charge until F paid. Section 4: Due to the fiscal implications of the Federal Tax Act, Council finds it is necessary for the peace, health, safety, and welfare F of the people of the City of Tigard to complete the sale of Bancroft Bonds hereunder prior to December 31, 1989. An emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Ordinance shall be effective on October 23, 1989. PASSED: By on VltVY)oup vote of the Council me ers present after being read by number and title only, this day of of oCfOl~ , 1989. Catherine Wheatley, Ci Recorder APPROVED: This a-3rd day of , " V Gerald R. Eden s, Mayor Approved as to form: Ci Attorney Date dj/O-FC-135.RW Qi 'I f ORDINANCE NO. 89- l[' Page 2 1548.01-60 Basic ttlglnt•otway Assessment TotFINAL ASSESSMENT POLL percentot Assessment Assessment (S) '`J~i j.~Ul+ LID FINAL W g,W ,135TH A Trlps Total (S) 0.00 CITY OF TIGARD Address Gen. 0.00 0.00 FirstName qOQ000 Map &.1ax Lot 138,755.44 LID 'SO. -Olt 0 0.04 1]493 E• ortland, OR 97266 138,755.44 08000 Burton p 2604 23.20442 0.00 1-1 1S133AC Grabhorn lien Blvd. 0.00 11480 S•W• mien 0,00 04300 Centron of Beaverton, OR 0 0.00004 15133DB 10,710.36 1-2 Oregon Box 23397 0.00 City of Tigard Bard, OR 87223 1.79112 10,710.36 ]S133DB 00]0] 201 1-3 11035 S.W. 135th St. 10,337.40 Daniel G. Tigard , OR 97223 40 0.00 1S133CA 00200 10,337, 2 Judith X. 1.72875 Duggan 2800 194 5th Ave. ~ 0,04 p71 Sunflower 111 S•W• 5 Kemper 0.00 00900 Attn. T•J• 97204 0.00 3 & 1S133CA Limited Inc. portland, OR 0 0.00000 0.40 9,058.53 10 City of Tigard T g. Box 233972297 9,458.53 1S133CA 00400 ard) OF, 0,00 10,394.68 4 11115 S.'W • 135th Ave. 170 1.51488 6 10,390.68 Gary R• COe Tigard, OR 97223 1.7376 .40 1S133CA 00300 Blvd. 195 2,557.70 5 2955 S.W. Fairview 2 Q Eugene 1. Fulop 97201 ,557.70 00104 Gross Portland, OR 48 0,42773 6 1S133CA & Ale en 0.04 5,168.67 R. & 11295 S•pg197223 Ave. 04500 Gary Tigard, 5,168.67 7 1S133CA patsy A• 0,86437 Nelson ve. #2804 97 111 S.W. 5th A 004 16,891.51 44800 FFI Sunflower Attn. T.J. Kemper 1 1S133CA Limited Inc. portland, OR 317 2.82481 16,8 9.51 . g 11295 S.W. 135th Ave. Gary R. Tigard, OR 97223 g 1S133CA 00700 Patsy P- 14 elson 1 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01-60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot Nu. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (s) (S) (S) 11 1S133CD 00100 Sunflower 10930 Lucky Oak Ct. 725 6.46052 38,631.96 0.00 38,631.96 Associates Cupertino, CA 95014 LTD Partnership 13 1S133CD 00300 Harold R. & 11720 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Elisabeth N. Tigard, OR 97223 Kearns 14 1S133CD 00400 Mark M. & 11724 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Leslie L. Tigard, OR 97224 Thomas 15 1S133CD 00500 Clarissa L. 1407 S.E. 27th, No. 8 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Litteer Portland, OR 97214 16 1S133CD 00600 Keith A. & 11732 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Deanna M. Tigard, OR 97223 Wildermuth 17 1S133CD 00700 Clarence H. 11736 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0108911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Baker & Tigard, OR 97223 Kathleen M. Brown 18 1S133CD 00800 Marcus Samuel 11740 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Nitsos Tigard, OR 97223 19 1S133CD 00900 Martha A. 11744 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Murphy Tigard, OR 97223 20 1S133CD 01000 Mark R. & 11748 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tiffany A. Tigard, OR 97223 Poulin 21 1S133CD 01100 Roy N. & 11752 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Barbara Boyd Tigard, OR 97223 2 of 53 1548"~l'6~~ _.~-r Total NT g,OLL V,lghvoova} pssess;nent ASSDggjVIE 13 p;sessmectt tsl ~~NpsL 'Per oentof P.ssesstnent ks) 532.85 135 V ENDE j,•I.D • 'Trips Total (S) ;,.00 .A Gen. TH 532.85 Address 532.85 CYTY TYGAR'D Sy. *;aMe 0.08911 ptrst. Swendon Loop 10 q.00 W • 532.85 Map B.TaX~'0~'~0~ LID T40- 119 56 S OR 91223 0.08911 532.85 01200 Daniel CV 4 ells Tigard, on Loop 10 Debra A• S.w, Swend 0.00 1S133CD 12120 91223 532.85 22 Maximo E• Tigard, 0R 0.08911 582.85 CD 01300 0.00 532.85 23 15133 ArigelesG. W, Swendon Loop 10 11962 S•OR 91223 O,g8911 582.85 0.00 Bates Tigard' S.W. Swendon boop 532.85 00 Billy 3udith E• K• 10 014 1S133CD 532.85 24 111 0R 91223 0.08911 0 0.0 00 Karen L• Tigard, endon Loop 10 532.85 1S133CD 015 MoLeod 11966 S. - 91223 0.08911 25 Tigard, Oy, 10 532.85 Earl R• Noar q.O0 1S133CD 01600 Diana L. - S.W. Swendon Loop 26 & 11168 OR 91223 532.85 532.85 Marilyn Y • Tigard, 0.08911 0 CD 01700 James M' Loop 10 0.0 27 15133 S.W. Swendon 532.85 Sean q.08911 Rider 11970 OR Sw en91223don 800 Barbara 532.85 Tigard, Loop 10 0•00 1S133CD 01 532.85 Br°phy 12300 S.W. 532.85 28 91223 q 08911 , Mark A• be Tigard, 0R' 10 q.00 D 01900 Rust 532.85 1S133C rAerri113• 4001 S.B. 64th 91206 q 88911 29 Allen 1q 532.85 D 02000 Susan Portland, 0R Swend , oa b op 0.00 30 1S133C 532.85 11182 S.W 97223 532.85 0 Thomas D. Tigard, OR 0.08911 0210 $eVerly 1" 0p 10 0.00 31 15133 CD W • Swendon Lo 582.85 Kerberger 11186 S' 91223 q.08911 Tbamas G. Tigard, OR Loop 10 ele3,11 W , Swendon 32 1S133GD 02200 Drak 11190 S•OR 91223 Mi,bael M, & Tigard, 1S133CD 02300 Gregory G' 33 Gerking OF 53 15~$-Ol'60 TOtai FINAL ASSESSMENT ROL"Bas%C Rip - t- AS ell) Assessment (S~ L•I'D• percentot Assessment (S) UE Trips pF TIGARD S•W • 135T'H AVEN TOcai ts) 532.85 CITY Address Gen. 0.08911 0.00 532.85 FirstName LID NO, Map &'r", Lot No- SwendOn LOOP 10 11794 S'~R 532.85 97223 Richard T• Tigard, 0.04 02400 532.85 34 15133CD Carolyn M• 10 0,08911 Maughan 11788 W. Swendon LOOP 4.00 532.85 S• 02500 John R• & Tigar OR 97223 d: 532.85 35 1S133CD Mary C• 10 0.08911 Manning 13745 S•W• Ashburry 532.85 David R. Ertel 0.04 02600 Lane OR 97223 532.85 36 1S133CD Tigard, 10 0.08911 w, Ashbury Lane 532,85 Ronald E. 13275 S• 87223 532,85 0.00 02700 be 34 1S133CD Janet E. Tigard, OR 10 0,08911 Chappell 13705 S.W. Ash bury Lane 532.85 Uetz Tigard, OR 97223 0.04 02800 Robert C. 532.85 38 1S133CD & Laura A• 0.08911 532.85 bell Lane 10 Came Ashbury 4.00 13681 S.W. 97223 532.85 02904 Sharlene Tigard: 10 0.48911 39 1S133CD Andrew shbury Lane 532.85 13665 S•W' 97223 0.00 03000 David W • be Tigard, OR 532.85 40 1S133CD Carlin Marie 10 0.08911 532.85 Batten 19155 S.E. McLoughlin 532 0.00 Inc. 84027 .85 Qualieo, Gladstone, OR 0,08911 15133CD 03100 Lane 14 41 13621 S.W. Ashbury 532.85 L• , OR 97223 0.00 Thomas 03200 Tigard 532,85 42 1S133CD Robin D. 10 0.08911 532.85 McGee shbury Lane 0.00 Mays 13593 S•W' 97223 532.85 03300 Peter T. May Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 43 1S133CD 13579S• W. Ashbury Lane 03400 Jeffrey W• Tigard, OR 97223 44 1S133CD Poulson 4 OF 53 - son NMI- 15~$'41.6Q OWN To~'t ENT BOLL RtBnt. oval kssossvn oopw „astc pssessmert (5) SESS FYNAL AS ettoi Assessment (5) 532.85 VENUE L.I.D. TrtAs pe'rotat (s) o,oo .R..D g,W • 135TH A Addrass Ge"' 532.85 A 0.08911 532.85 CITY OF TYG first;:ame Lane 10 0.00 vtap&TaxLotNo. 135 532.85 69 S.W • A94 223 LID ~u• 532.85 0.48911 p.00 Bryan L. 6t Tigard, O~ 1S133CD 03500 C lien A• . Ashbury Lane 10 532.85 45 532.85 C h ' Buell 13543 SW 91 223 10 0.08911 0.Q4 Tigard, OR a 532.85 CD 03600 Lillie A• S.M. Asrbury Lan 532.85 1S133 13524 OR 94223 10 O.Q8911 p.OQ 46 33CD 00 ape cer Tigard, * Wendon Loop 532.85 532.85 44 1S1 037 ary 11404 s, 94223 10 O.Q8911 0.00 OIL Kathleen M Tigard: park 4 532.85 532.85 1S133CD 03800 Hamel 2850 S•W' W eb OR 9X03 0.08911 48 3onn Lake Oswego, 10 0.00 900 Derek Swendon 1,00P 532.85 1S133CD D3 Warren 11412 S•QW'R g4223 p,08911 10 532.85 49 Daniel G. bt an Tt ard, g on Loop d O.QO Morg W Swen 532.85 1S133CD 04000 Martha 11416 S• 94223 50 Tigard, OR p.48911 532.85 Michael L• 04100 10 0.00 1S133CD Kathleen R• Asrbury Lane 51 Frutiger 13580 S'W • 94223 532.85 WilliamA-F' Tigard, OR 0.08911 04200 e 10 15133CD N anal • , Asrbury Lan 532.85 52 pow ell 13598 S'W94223 0.00 Michael G• Tigard, OR 532.85 CD 043p4 Jan. Jaffe 10 0.48911 532.85 53 15133 Herman a Gol p,00 dberg W, Ashbury Lan 532.85 A. ,ga 0 94223 germeth T 10 0.48911 1S133GD 04440 Shelli p• r Lane 54 Wanvlg 13642 S'~RAg422 3CD 04540 De ra S.bc Tigard, 1513 3 55 Schultz 3 a OF 5 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) (S) 56 11133CD 04600 Michael T. do 13664 S.W. Ashbury Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lanelle A. Tigard, OR 97223 Monje 57 1S133CD 04700 Qualico, Inc. 19155 S.E. McLoughlin 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Gladstone, OR 97027 58 1S133CD 04800 Anita K. Hanna 13675 S.W. Feiring 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97224 59 1S133CD 04900 Steven G. 13669 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Nina C. Adams Tigard, OR 97223 60 1S133CD 05000 James M. be 14545 S.W. Hall Blvd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Lisa A. Tigard, OR 97223 Domenighini 61 1S133CD 05100 Nicholas do 13617 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Teresa Koush Tigard, OR 97223 62 1S133CD 05200 Sean M. be 13595 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tonni R. Dugas Tigard, OR 97223 63 1S133CD 05300 Pedro & Maria 13579 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 S. Gonzales Tigard, OR 97223 64 1S133CD 05400 Joseph E. do 13570 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Linda B. Tigard, OR 97223 Westling 65 1S133CD 05500 Siamak Eghlidi 13596 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 be Mary L. Tigard, OR 97223 Hazard 66 1S133CD 05600 Don S. do 13624 S.W. Feiring Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Colleen Rice Tigard, OR 97223 6 OF 53 15~s-al•aa mpopow- Total NT R~x'A' Rlght'ot.W a~ pssessment L ASC.yESSMF' Basic pssessment (S) ~AN percent of pssessment (S) $32,95 J'A.D' TTWS Total (S) 0.00 D, S.W .135TH AVENUE Gen 532.85 OF TAGAg paaress 1a 4,oa911 GAT Y First ame e Lot o. 48 5.W .Fairing Lan 532.85 1 & T a'4 Llpru. 136 OR 97223 0,00 el A• ard, 532.85 7 1S133CD 05700 Wh flow Tig p,08911 532.85 6 & Ggea J• 10 0.00 W . F eirin9 Lane 532.85 Walker 13662g ~R 97223 0 QB911 K, Tigard) 10 ' D 05800 Bret Sorg Fairing Lane 532.85 68 iS133C PegV A' 15670 S•W' 91223 0,00 Michael Tigard, OR 532.85 1S133CD 05900 G' O.Oggll y32.85 3ohnson 69 Elizabeth Loop 10 p.40 Hoch S.W. Swendon 532.$5 Johnson- H 11763 ~R 91223 0.08911 Kenneth R. 6c Tigard, on Loop 10 532.85 D 06000 Lani Seari W• Swend 0.04 70 1S133011759 S•CR 91223 532.85 Robert 3 • Tigard, 0.08911 532.85 06100 10 0.00 71 1S133CD pepada es Swendon Loop 532.85 11753 S•w gg223 0.08911 3 of f A. ~ Tigard, on 1,00P 10 532.85 06200 Fast gwend 0.00 72 1S133CD Kathy D. 11149 S'W' 97223 532.85 R• be Tigard' OIL 0.08911 3CD 06300 D atberine M• LOOP 10 532.85 3 1513 erald Swendon 0,00 F itzg 117 35 S'Og g7 223 532.85 Tigard, 0.08911 CD 06400 Benny L• 10 y32.85 7 4 15133 Betty 3. gill 0.00 Greene 11804 S.W. M°rning W • ~ y32.85 06500 Michael Drive OR 91223 10 0,p8911 1813 CD 3anet K• Tigard, Y1i11 15 Estoup 11812 S W ,Morning W • Drive OR 97223 1S153CD 06600 Kare L• Tigard, 76 Roeser • Z OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Basic Right•ot-Way Total Trips LID No, Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Gen. PeTotal t Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (s) 77 1S133CD 06700 Preston R. 11820 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Paakkonen Drive Tigard, OR 97223 78 1S133CD 06800 Edward A. & 11828 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Brook Egging Drive Tigard, OR 97224 79 1S133CD 06900 Frank N. 11579 S.W. Swendon Loop 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Becker Tigard, OR 97223 80 1S133CD 07000 James 0. & 11844 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathleen V. Drive Boylan Tigard, OR 97224 81 1S133CD 07100 Larry D. & 11352 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Christine A. Drive LeBore Tigard, OR 97224 82 1S133CD 07200 Mark L. & 11860 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynnett D. Lee Drive Tigard, OR 97223 83 1S133CD 07300 Jonathan B. & 11868 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Robin L. Drive Mulkey Tigard, OR 97223 84 1S133CD 07400 Brian R. & 11876 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Sally E. Bovero Drive Tigard, OR 97223 85 1S133CD 07500 A. Garth & 11884 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 l Denise L. Drive McKnight Tigard, OR 97223 86 1S133CD 07600 Joyce A. Dixon 11092 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 8 OF 53 i' CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total {S) (S) {S) 96 1S133CD 09700 Charles A. & 11778 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Donna Jo Drive McKenzie Tigard, OR 97223 97 1S133CD 09800 Ryan G. & 11756 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Susan C. Koch Drive Tigard, OR 97223 98 1S133CD 09900 Keith M. & 11890 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Vicki L. Tigard, OR 97223 Sorenson 99 1S133CD 10000 Steven C. & 11878 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janice L. Cole Tigard, OR 97223 100 1S133CD 10100 David P. & 11856 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tanya J. La Tigard, OR 97223 Duca 10 Of 53 5 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Bight-of-wuy Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Gen. Total Assessment Assessment Assessment (5) 87 1S133CD 07700 David P. & 11885 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Karin R. Drive Trowbridge Tigard, OR 97223 88 1S133CD 07800 David P. & 507 N.W. 22nd Avenue, 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynda R. #107 Domogalla Portland, OR 97210 89 1S133CD 07900 John Wayne & 11869 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Dianna Marie Drive Hill Tigard, OR 97223 90 1S133CD 08000 Margrethe 11861 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Rodlun- Drive Schnider Tigard, OR 97223 91 1S133CD 08100 Johnny Brown 11853 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Jeanette Go Drive Tigard, OR 97223 92 1S133CD 08200 Gregory W. 11845 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Hopkins & Drive Nancy Peake Tigard, OR 97224 93 1S133CD 08300 Joseph C. & 11837 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Martina T. Drive Schaffner Tigard, OR 97223 94 1S133CD 08400 Edward A. & 11829 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Mary Lou Drive Howden Tigard, OR 97223 95 1S133CD 08500 Christine C. 11821 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Todd & Drive Jacqueline B. Tigard, OR 97223 Boan 9oF. 53. 154~'Q1'S0 Total ent NT RpLL rt•otway FI.NALASSESSMF' Basta AAssessme°t Assetsm j~E L•I'D' percentot i Aessment (s) Trips 532•$5 S,w,135Tx AVEN C,en. Total (s) 4.44 CITY 4F TIC"AR,D Address 532.85 532.85 Map 0.08911 , girstl~ame ve. 10 0.00 &Tax~otro. W, Wilton A 532.85 ~.o 97223 08911 10200 Sung K• Chung Tigard, OR lton Ave. 10 0532.85 1S133CD W , W 0.00 101 Baker 11812 OR 92223 $32.85 CD 103 Philip E • Tigard, 0,48911 00 pee G. 10 532.85 102 15133 ve. Andros W, Wilton 0,00 11116 S• R 97223 532.85 David B• Tigard, 0 4.08911 532.85 10400 Sandi 10 1S133CD Sa Ave. 0'00 103 Carnahan 11754 S.W. Wilton 532.85 0.08911 Bruce 3. & Tigard, OR 91223 10 532.85 10500 to A• MaY W ,Wilton Ave. 0.00 104 1S133CD Debbie 11132 S•OR gZ223 532,85 es W • Tigard, 14 0.08911 532,85 CD 14604 Jam 15133 Lenatte R- Road 0,00 105 Grieb S,W •Sore. tO 532,85 Toth g650 OR 97405 10 0.08911 1lelen 3• Beaverton, Ave. 532.85 1S133CD 10700 S,W, Wilton 4.00 11674 OR 91223 532.85 106 14800 Don a •C Tigard, 10 0.08911 0 532.85 1S133CD Bond e 4.0 107 Gerdes S.W. Ashbury Lan $32.85 13267 OR gZ223 0.08911 532.85 Steven C. Tigard, Lane 10 0.00 ]S~33CD 10900 Stearns S.W. Ashbury 532.85 532.8 $7723 108 10 0.08911 5 0.04 CD James Kai T gard, OR • 3 Lane 532 15133 11400 Tong .8 109 13821 S•ORA91223 00 W. Paul be Jill Tigard, Ave 10 0.08911 M. Jones , Wiltan . 116 1S133CD 111 11689 S•W 97223 11200 RusselE 'Head Tigard, OR 111 1S133CD Clara 1} . ~F 53 1 3 ' 1548.01.6a ROLL,, Total mom FINAL A55ES5MENT Basic Right•oiway Assessment L.1.D • t Assessment 135`rH AVENUE Tr1Ps Percent at Assessment Total (S) (S) ' TIGARD Gen. 532.85 CITY OF Address 0,00 e 532.$5 0 LIDNO. Map&,TaxLot*;.o. FirstN am 11721 S.W• Wilton Ave. 10 ,08911 532.85 John K• & Tigard, OR 97223 0,00 1S133CD 11300 532.85 112 Brenda 3• 10 0.08911 Gilpin S.W. Wilton Ave. +Dell & 11243 OR 97223 0.00 532.85 11400 Mark 0 Tigard, 532.85 113 1S133CD Kellie Jeanine 10 0,08911 . Lowman 11765 S.W Wilton Ave. 532.85 00 11500 A• Loraine & Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 0. 114 IS133CD Gerald Ni• 10 0.08811 532.85 lieuer W. Wilton Ave. 0.p0 D. Ronald & 11787 S•OR 97223 532.85 11600 Tigard, 10 0.08911 5 0.00 532.85 115 1S133CD Ann M, Turner 11801 S.W. Wilton Ave. 11700 June M. Todd Tigard, OR 97223 10 0,08911 532.8 116 1S133CD W, Wilton Ave. 532.85 11823 S.aR 97223 0,00 D 11800 Michael & Tigard, 532.85 110 1S133C Carrie A• 10 0.08911 Stegmann 11890 S.W. Wilton Ave. 532.85 00 Roy D, yfeifer Tigard, 87223 532.85 0. 1S133CD 11900 & Sandra M. 118 10 0.08911 Wright S.W. Wilton Ave. 532.85 11867 OR 97223 0,00 12000 Ronald 3• & Tigard, 532,85 119 1S133CD Laurie h- 10 0.08911 Vrvilo Wilton Ave. 11889 S• 0.00 532.85 12100 V evi C• & Tigard, OR 87223 532.85 120 1S133CD Michelle L• 10 0.08911 532.85 Gladysx 11925 S.OW •R Wilton 97223 ve 0.00 532.85 12200 James D. Tig ard, 10 0.08911 121 1S133 CD Butterfield ir. 11566 S•W• Sheffield C' Hong C. Doung Tigard, OR 97223 1S133DB 00300 122 12 or 0 Total NT ROLL wgut•o"By Assessment IN AI' Basic Assessment (S) F ercentoi k Assessment (s) 32,85 B A 'BNV~L•I•L• 'fries F Total ts) 5 p.o0 TIGA S•ui, Address 532.85 CITY OF 135`I Gen' RD 532.85 xame lp 0.08911 4.00 gust . Cir• &Ta%Lot14 0- W, Sheffield 532.85 Map LID140. 11574 OR 912,23 0,48911 r 6c DB 00400 Betty C' B ua Tigard, Cir. 10 532.85 f 15133 B S,W . Shef ield 0.00 123 Jr• 11576 OR 91223 532.85 Henry B•, Tigard 10 0.48911 1S133DB 04500 & Barbara J• Cir. 532.85 12~ yorner S,W• Sheffield 0.00 11578 81223 532,85 Robert 3. be Tigard, OR 0.48911 532.85 15133DB 00644 et L. Or- 14 0.00 125 Albrecht S.W , Sheffield 532,85 11584 97223 th 10 0.48911 532.85 Bob Dilwor Tigard: OR ld Or' 04700 Sheff lie 4.00 126 1S133Dg 11586 5•W. 91223 532.85 Larry J. Tigard: OR 4,08911 . 1S133DB 00800 3anette K• 10 532.85 127 McGlinchy S.W , Sheff field 4.00 11588 OR 87223 532.85 Scott K• Tigard, 4.08911. 532.85 1S133DB 00900 Christine L• Cir. 10 0'00 128 S.W .Sheffield 532.85 Gilfillan 11594 OR 91223 0.0911 Catherine L• Tigard, Cir. 10 532.85 OR 91225heffi3ld 0.00 129 1S133DB 01000 Hyde 11600S. 53285 85 n D• 6c Tigard? 0.08911 532• 1S133D5 01144 Joh 10 0.00 Judith W • Cir. 130 Taylor 11644 5.W. Sheffield 532.85 OR 91223 0.Q8911 582.85 0.00 3erernl Wilson Tigard, CIT. 10 1S133DB 01200 W, Sheffield 532.85 131 11660S•O.it 81223 10 0.08911 33DB 01300 MCComb • Tigard, W• Sheffield Cir• 132 is 11685 S•O.R 97223 Michael D• Tigard, 1S133DB 01400 Molly A• 133 Swigert 13 OF g3 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01-60 Trips Percentot Basic Rlght•of•Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment . Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) 134 1S133DB 01500 Roger Eric & 11665 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Jenna Sue Tigard, OR 97223 Johnson 135 1S133DB 01600 Lee J. & 11645 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Angela M. Tigard, OR 97223 Cutbirth 136 1S133DB 01700 James L. & 11625 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carrol L. Hicks Tigard, OR 97223 137 1S133DB 01800 Gregory L. & 11605 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathy S. Tigard, OR 97223 Kamps 138 1S133DB 01900 Stephen J. & 11599 S.W. 134th Place 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Marilyn E. Tigard, OR 97223 & John W. Winter 139 1S133DB 02000 David W. & 11597 S.W. 134th Place 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Julie A. Tigard, OR 97223 Stephens 140 11133DB 02100 Larry D. & 11595 S.W. 134th Place 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Wanda D. Haug Tigard, OR 97223 141 11133DB 02200 Tracy W. & 11593 S.W. 134th Place 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Sigrid A. Hart Tigard, OR 97223 142 1S133DB 02300 Teri V. Wasco 11591 S.W. 134th Place 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 143 IS133DB 02400 Kevin J. & 16175 S.W. Kimbal 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynn R. Lake Oswego, OR 97034 O'Halloran 14 'OF 53 r. 1548.01.60 Total OWN T ROLL R~ght.oi.Wal Assessment L A55ESrMEN cs) A Basic Assessment FIN nt of t Assessment (s) NUD L.I.D• Gen. s Total (s) 532.85 135TH AVE pe 0.00 CITY ().F TIG X. R'D S.W • Address 532.85 FirstName 10 0,05911 Map & Tax Lot Sheffield CIO. 11565S• W • 94 223 2.85 gdward b- & Tigard, OR 53 155 1S133Dg 03600 Mary Anne 10 4.0811 532.85 e e 0,00 Klnnarnan 11465 SW Wint223 Dr. 3 532.85 Tigard) OR 84 0.08911 DB 03400 Richad D. 10 532 15133 Katherine A• ,85 McGregor Winterlake Dr- 156 0,00 ck 11445 S OR 94223 532.85 038p0 Gerald D' Tigard, 10 q,08911 4 15133DB Pe%V L• r• 532.85 15 gartwick W Winterlake D 0.00 11425 S OR 94223 532.85 W ayne T%ard, 0,08911 1S133DR 03900 & Carlton ke Dr, 10 2,131.40 108 elter W interla 0.00 W 11405 S OR 97223 2,131.40 54 W illiam do Tigard, 40 0.35644 ' 1608.42 1S133DB g4000 Carol L• 11475. 159 Jenkins 135th 532.85 84223 Steven G' be on Tigard) OR 10 0,08911 5,010.54 8,267.65 0204 tails 135th 3197.11 160 1S133DC 0 yinda J • 11640 S•W' 94223 466 532.85 6c I i Tigard, OR 60 0.53 0.p0 00304 George O'Scott Vol-L' 35th , 1S133DC Donna M• 11640 S, 532.85 161 e p, be 97223 0.08911 Georg Tigard, T Lane 10 532.85 C 00400 Donna Ni. scot t 162 1S133D 13281 S•~.- 97223 amera C• 532.85 0,00 ysureston Tigard, 10 4•gg911 0 163 1S133DC 14600 & Christine E• S, W • Tamera Lane 532.85 -1 porter .00 13269 OR 97223 532.85 Richard D' Tigard, 14 0.08811 3DC 14700 glorence J. 163-2 1513 F P.O. Box ederson 25571 917,23 C 14800 Dougn la poling portland, OR 15133D Susa , 163-3 16 OF 53..' CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Basic Right-of-way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Trips Percent of Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) 144 1S133DB 02500 Lee H. & 11587 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911. 532.85 0100 532.85 Virginia B. Tigard, OR 97223 Robertson 145 1S133DB 02600 Davis R. & 11585 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol D. Tigard, OR 97223 Stanger 146 1S133DB 02700 Jeffrey K. & 11583 S.W. Sheffield Cir, 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Linda K. Tigard, OR 97223 Hawley 147 1S133DB 02800 Thomas A. & 11581 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Rosalinda Tigard, OR 97223 Rothenberg 148 1S133DB 02900 Gary S. & 11579 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532,85 0.00 532.85 Heidi L. Wayt Tigard, OR 97223 149 1S133DB 03000 Yao-Ke & Wai 11577 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Chun Tam Tigard, OR 97223 Chang 150 1S133DB 03100 Dennis M. 11575 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Bourgeois Tigard, OR 97223 151 1S133DB 03200 Harry C. & 11573 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Barbara E. Tigard, OR 97223 Scoles 152 1S133DB 03300 Vicki L. 11571 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Spurgeon Tigard, OR 97223 153 1S133DB 03400 William J. & 11569 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Beth L. Trubits Tigard, OR 97223 154 1S133DB 03500 Donald & 11567 S.W. Sheffield Cir. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Cheryl Tigard, OR 97223 McKernan i 1s OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01-60 Trips Percentof Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No, First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 163-4 1S133DC 14900 Don Morissette P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Builder, Inc. Portland, OR 97223 163-5 1S133DC 15000 Don Morissette P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Builder, Inc. Portland, OR 97223 163-6 1S133DC 15100 Don Morissette P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Builder, Inc. Portland, OR 97223 163-7 1S133DC 15200 Yosaburo be 13087 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Yoko Morita Tigard, OR 97223 163-8 1S133DC 15300 Don Morissette P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Builder, Inc. Portland, OR 97223 163-9 1S133DC 15400 Kathryn L. be 12945 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Dale L. Tigard, OR 97223 Baldwin 163-10 IS133DC 15500 Mark K. do 12923 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Joyce Elaine Tigard, OR 97223 W old 163-11 1S133DC 15600 R. Scott & 12901 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Sheryl R. Tigard, OR 97223 Hansen 163-12 1S133DC 15700 Stephen Alan 12930 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Kathy B. Tigard, OR 97223 Cohoon 163-13 1S133DC 15800 William F., Jr. 12952 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & M. Elaine Tigard, OR 97223 Priester 163-14 1S133DC 15900 Dennis & Su- 12974 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lan Johnson Tigard, OR 97223 17 OF 53 15~$•O1'60 Total QLY' ENT Bt8bt•ot-Way Assessment R FINAL ASSESSIV~ Baste Assessment (S) L,I,D• Perontof Assessment $5 AVENUE Trips Total 0.00 532• TK Gen TIGAR,.DS•w • 135 Address 532.85 CITY OF 0.08911 532.85 pirstNan1e Mont Dr, 10 0.00 wro l'ot N o. , Laur 532.85 I,Ip,'0 Map 12996 S•W 94223 532.85 Nadine R• Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 1S133DC 16040 White E, 60th 0.00 15 14 OR 97213 163- 2734 532.85 C 16104 Dave A- portland, 10 0.08811 15133D 30leen M' Laurmon t Dr, 532.85 163-16 Anderson v • 0.00 Jr. 13032 S•0 R 97223 532.85 Charles v Tigard, 14 0,08911 532.85 1S133DC 16200 & Sharon W • ont Dr, 0.00 163-17 Dunham W •Laurm 532.85 13044 S' R 94223 ienry K• Todd Tigard, O 10 0,0$911 532.85 15133DC 16340 Brenda K• W •Laurm°nt Dr. 0.00 18 13456 8• 97223 .85 163- Tigard, OR' 532 Brent S' 0 Tig 10 0.08911 C 16400 Kyung $0 er ont Dr- 9 133D • Laurm 0.00 '63-1 15 e r 163-1 M 97223 ossberg 1 532.85 0 Anthony Tigard, OR 0.08911 04 532.85 16500 Jos rmont Dr. 1 163- 20 1S133D C C h a Lg e 592.85 Tra 13090 S•W' t223 1 11 E• Tigard, OR 10 0.0891 532.85 8804 Randa yltcll ont Dr. 1S133DC 1 Laura A• W, Laurm 0.00 21 13112 S•OR 91223 532.85 163- Tigard, 16700 Kelly 3• 10 0,0$911 532.85 . 1S133DC Angela S• ont Dr. 0 00 163-22 M°skaliy, S.W. Laurm 532.85 3ulie 13134 97223 p,08911 $32.85 Olaf M• Tigard, OR ont Dr. 10 0.40 1S133DC 16800 R. Svenson Laurm 532.85 163-23 13158 OR 91223 Kathryn Tigard, 10 0.08911 ont Dr. iS133DC 16904 'Humphrey 13160 S•W .Laurm 183-24 JoneS Tigard, OR 97223 14004 Nellie L• 163-25 15133DC , 18 OP 53 `t 4 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01.60 Trips Percent of I Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map 8 Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) 163-26 1S133DC 17100 Dale 1. 13172 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911. 532.85 0.00 532.85 Watanabe Tigard, OR 97223 163-27 1S133DC 17200 Don Morissette P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Builder, Inc. Portland, OR 97223 163-28 1S133DC 17300 Alexander B. 13236 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Dina D. Tigard, OR 97223 Balough 163-29 1S133DC 17400 Marie 13258 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Hathaway Tigard, OR 97223 163-30 1S133DC 17500 Don Morissette P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Builder, Inc. Portland, OR 97223 163-31 1S133DC 17600 Robert Iri & 13292 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Marjorie Lynet Tigard, OR 97223 Glover 163-32 1S133DC 17700 Gary M. & 13247 S.W. Laurmont Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Katherine M. Tigard, OR 97223 Waxman 163-33 1S133DC 17800 Terry J. & Lori 13178 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 L. Krumm Tigard, OR 97223 163-34 1S133DC 17900 William S. & 13146 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Esther B. Born Tigard, OR 97223 163-35 1S133DC 18000 Wayman E. & 13134 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Margaret L. Tigard, OR 97223 Nordstrom 163-36 1S133DC 18100 Larry A. & 13120 S.W. Tamera Lane 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol A. Tigard, OR 97223 Skuzie 19' OF 53 „ 15~~-01'60 Total AL ASSESSMENT ROLL Basta Right.0 May Assessment FIN ssessment (S) NUELJ'D• percentos• Assessment (S) 135TH AVE Trtps Total (S) 532.85 TICARD S'W' Gen. 0.40 CITY OF Address 532.85 FirstName 10 0.08911 LIDNo. Map&TaY.Lotro• S•Tamer. Lane 4.00 532.85 13094 Q.fi. 97223 Kim Anthony Tigard, 532.85 1S133DC 18200 . Christine L• 10 q,08911 532,85 163-37 Louie Tamer. Lane 0.00 13058 S•W' 87223 532.85 James E• Tigard, OR 10 4.08911 163-38 1S133DC 18300 Susan Butler 13081 S W • Laurm 97223 ont Dr. 00 532,85 ' 0'0 William g• be Tigard, OR 532,85 1S133DC 1840 Constance L. 10 0.08911 532.85 163-38 0,00 Bishop p.0. Box 19525 532.85 d OR g7219 10 0,08911. 532.85 C 18500 Don Morissette portlan 1S133D Builder) Inc. S.W. Laurmont Dr. 0.00 163-40 13165 OR 87223 532.85 David L. Tigard, 10 0.48911 1S133DC 18600 pelinka Winterlake Dr' 1,Q65,70 163-41 11655 S OR 97223 0.00 herald Tigard, 1,065.74 1S133DC 00505 lAelan1e B' 20 0.17822 163-42 Liddell Rise $32.85 13254 S'W' Falcon 4.00 Wedgevlood Tigard, OR 97223 $32,85 1S133DC 00600 Homes Of 10 4.08911 0.00 164 Inc. 13035 S•W• galeon Rise 4.00 0.40 portlandr Michael 3 J• & Orr Tigard, OR 97223 0 0.00000 165 1S133DC 40700 Sandra alcon 13025 S Rise •~R 97223 0.04 0.00 Dennis P.• & Tigard, 0.00 1S133DC 00840 Christine 0 0.00000 532.85 166 galeon Rise 0.00 Jensen 13065 S•W' 532.85 Janet Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.48811. 1S133DC 00841 Dennis RiSe lfi7 W. Hasty 13065 S.W. Falcon Dennis .Janet Tigard, OR 97223 1S133DC 00900 M. Hasty 168 20 or 53 t CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.T.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01.60 Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map S Tax Lot No. First Name Address Gen. Trips Perc Total al i Assessment Assessment Assessment (S) (S) (S) 169 11133DC 01000 Martha K. 13085 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Clancy Tigard, OR 97223 170 1S133DC 01100 David M. 13105 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Gaffney & Tigard, OR 97223 Patricia A. Oriti 171 1S133DC 01200 Ryan J. Kelly 13125 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 172 1S133DC 01300 Vaghn S. & 13145 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Patricia L. Tigard, OR 97223 Hickman 173 1S133DC 01400 Tomio 13165 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Urushitani Tigard, OR 97223 174 1S133DC 01500 David A. & 13185 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol S. Tigard, OR 97223 Donaldson 175 1S133DC 01600 Linzey J. & 13217 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Thaworn Tigard, OR 97223 Forrest 176 1S133DC 01700 Olive M. & 13225 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.35 0.00 532.85 Clarena L. Tigard, OR 97223 Charles 177 IS133DC 01800 Daniel J. 13245 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Watson Tigard, OR 97223 178 1S133DC 01900 Mark H. & 13265 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Marilyn R. Tigard, OR 97223 Bonebrake 53 21 OF' 1548•a1.g0 Towat Noma NT g.~1' RAgbt•ot v1a5 Assessment FIN entof"1 Assessment A(S)ssessment 532.85 pe tS) p,00 AVE'NUE`' I,.Y.D• T~,ien. Total ts) " F TIGARD S,W Address 532.85 CITY 10 0.08911 532.85 Ftrstl ame gise 4,p0 " gTaxL°tI+°• 13285 S•W• galcon -i 3r, 92223 532.85 LID ;:o, Map Og gobert Tigard, D 10 Q.08911 000 ~ Annette 119 iS133DC OZ Poole 0 s.W, Morning will 1195 Beni, Franklin Drive 91223 532.85 15133DC 02100 Federal Loan Tigard, OK 0.00 180 savings 532.85 Assn• 10 0.48911 532,85 E. elo n e, Abney W Morning Kill 0.00 3oa 11930 S• 532.85 0 RobeCt K• Drive g 97223 10 Q.08g11 1S133DC 0220 Pamela Tigard' O Hill 181 George 11920 S•W • Morning Stephen & Drive 223 1S133D 532.85 Tigard, Og 91 C p2g00 patrlca K' 4'q4 182 532.85 al Edward L' M 4.48911 F 16 ary Morning 11111 532.85 Kendall 11910 S.W • 0.00 400 Karry L• Drive Og S1225 532.85 1S133DC OZ Sch~kart Tigard' 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 183 Marilyn M' Will Schukart 11900 S.W • Morning 532.85 Morris l Di, ard, Og 91223 10 p.08911 42500 Sohn C. 1S133DC Mitzi Tg Morning Kill 18A 11945 S•W K C & Fang Drive Og 94223 1s133DC 02600 Tan Chen Tigard, 185 ' 22 0? '53 11 -Now . ' 1 154a-01.ga WNW- Total oon QLL gtg WBY Assessment N AL ASSESSMENT R Basic xssessiment (S) FY tot • ment (5) percen Asseis) 532.85 L•Y'D • Trtps Total 135TH AVENUE Gen. 0.40 ITY OF TIGARD S,W Aaaress 532.85 G hill 0.08911 'f',C et~ ame Map Lotn o. 14 &Tax 12002 S.W .Morning LID h o. Dean p,. Drive g1223 532.85 15133DC 02144 Leslie Tigard, OR 0.00 186 W atanabe 532.85 Robert S• 10 0,08911 532.85 F aith F • Hill n W atanabe W . Morni g 0.04 11925 S• 532,85 Karen C Drive 91223 C 02804 C. , OR 10 0.08911 532.85 1S133D Thomas Tigard Y1i11 c Morning 0.00 M 181 CO3 11935 S.W • 532.85 Berman Drive OIL 94223 10 0.08911 C 02900 Marianne Tigard, Hill 532.85 188 1S133D White S.W. Morning 0.00 11945 532.85 p• Drive OR g1223 C 03000 Tigard, 10 0.48911 532.85 1S133D Ann Victor ette L. 11111 189 Kirma 11955 S•W . Morning 0.04 ~ 592.85 India M• Y. Drive OR 91223 14 0.08911 03100 lerman Tigard, Kill 532.85 190 iS133D 3obelmann .WMorning p,00 11965 5 II Drive 532.85 03200 Marcus C•, Tigard, OR 91223 10 0,08g1.1 D Katina M• Z11 532.85 1S133 C 191 Reaves g.W. MorNng 0.44 12002 532.85 2.85 Sohn D• & Drive OR 91223 • 10 0.48911 53 15133DC 03344 Sherd G. Tigard, 0.44 192 enberger Falcon Rise Dr 532.85 Knapp 13250 SW 3D 91223 Q.pg911 OR 10 C 034Q0 W Kedgewood Tigard, Dr' omes, Inc' W F Rise alcon 193 1S13 13194 S )7 91223 03540 Virginia M- Tigard, 15133DC Hanson 194 23 or 53 t., CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01.60 Trips PercentofI Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Namc Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total 195 1S133DC 03600 Hans H. & 13170 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Patricia J. Tigard, OR 97223 Nahme 196 1S133DC 03700 John R. & Sally 13150 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 A. Georgeson Tigard, OR 97223 197 1S133DC 03800 Dennis T. & 13130 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Valerie M. Tigard, OR 97223 Wolf 198 1S133DC 03900 Lynn & 13110 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Rebecca L. Tigard, OR 97223 Stafford 199 1S133DC 04000 Jerry D. & 13090 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Arleen N. Tigard, OR 97223 Barnett 200 1S133DC 04100 Gary Raymond 13050 SW Falcon Rise Dr. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 i • s i i 24 OF 53 . 15~s•al-6a Total ENT ROLL sess S5M. Itlght•ocway FINAL ASSE Basic Assessment D• Assessment ts) 135TH AVBNUB I„. Trips percentot' Assessment (s) 4.00 CITY OF TIGARD S.W • yen, Total ts) 0.00 0.00 0 0.00004 Map V Tax Lot NO- FirstName Address LID NO, 0.04 0.00 Bill 1S133DC 44190 Morninowners 0.00 532.85 201 Home 0 0.00000 0.00 Assoc. ddress 532.85 Pearl Unknown A 10 0.48911 532.85 04240 John R. W. Sheffield Cir• 0.00 242 1S133DC 11562 S. 97223 532.85 04300 Steven H• Tigard: OR 10 0.08911 203 1S133DC Schreiber 3250 S•W, Brittany 532.85 1 4.00 04400 Gary D. & Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 204 1S133DC Nancy L. 10 0,08911 532.85 Hostetler 1560 W • 133rd place 4.40 A. Gates 1, S.N. 97223 532.85 04500 Cathy Tigard' 10 4.08911 532.85 205 1S133DC W, 133rd Place 0.00 11558 S• g7223 532.85 ,600 Glenda Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 532.85 206 1S133DC McAdam S.W. 133rd place 0.00 Wheeler 11556 S• 87223 532.85 0470D Blnora Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 207 1S133DC 133rd Place 532.85 11554 Ricky R• Tigard, OR 91223 532.85 0.00 1S133DC 04800 10 0.08911 Ann 208 3u1* le Deeds W, 133rd Place 532.85 11558 S• 04900 David H•, 3r. Tigard, 97223 OR 532.85 0.00 209 1S133 DC & Katie S. 10 0.08911 Niskanen 11555 S.W. Brittany 532,85 4,00 05000 Frank H• Place iS133DC Wells 97223 582.85 210 Patti 3. Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 532,85 1 W • 133rd Place 0.00 uelyn Tigard11559, S• OR 97223 10 4.08911 532.85 211 1S133DC 05100 3ac9 Agee S. W. Brittany Dr. Richard G. ill & 13285 Tigard, OR 97223, 212 0520 1S133DC 0 Carol 3. H p.5 OF 53 1645.01.6 Total S EAT RDI,L yubt.of•Way Assessment ~YN AL A5SE5 Basic Assessment t5) percentoi 1 Assessment t5) 532•$5 L.I.D• Trips UE x Total (s) 0.00 CITY ~FT1GA Address 532.85 532.85 . - . RD S'w • 13~T ADEN Gen. to q,os911 0.00 FirstName • gTaxl•otNo• W• Brittany Dr' 532.85 532.85 LltlN o Map • 3010-e B• Tigard, OR 87223 10 0.08911 Dr 0.00 C 05300 Travers W, Brittany ' 532.85 213 1S133D 13355 S• 91223 0,Q891T Elizabeth K• Tigard, OR Dr' 10 532$5 DC 0300 Davis W. Brittany 0.40 214 15133 13435 S• 91223 532.85 .85 30seph C. Tigard, OR 532 C 05540 erne B' 10 0.08911 0.00 215 ]S133D Mares Brittany Dr' 532.85 Bertrand 1355 S,W. 91223 Mich 0.08911 532•$5 ael K• Tigard, OR 0,04 532.85 532.85 15 1S133DC 05500 Burns W, Brittany Dr' 10 2 W . Betty 134155' OR 91223 14 p.08911 p.00 Lee Tigards C 05700 L. ?akulak .W, Brittany Dr. 532.85 23 211 1S133D 13495 5 OR 912 W 0.08911 ~ Elaine Tigard, 10 532.85 05800 Peter ay 0.04 1S133DC Prank 13222 Manse 82040 218 53285 C 0 David S. Lakeside, 10 0.08911 0590 Geving 61 Cir• 532.85 218 1S133D Kraska S.W. Shefl1eld q.00 Michele 11615 OR 91223 532.85 William R• Tigard, 0.08911 C 05000 l be Alice 10 532.85 220 1S133D Rr randchamF 1320 5.W • Brittany $5 p.00 532. Randy L• Drive 91223 10 0.08911 532.85 C 06100 Eggers Tigard, OR 221 1S133D S'W• Brittany 0.00 11390 532•x5 O OR 10 0.48911 Richard G•lson Scfuare 91223 1S133DC Q6200 Michele Tigard+ 222 W .Brittany Drive l C 06340 Lynda D. Bell Tigard, OR 91223 1S133D 223 _ _ , - 25 0 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percentoft Basic Right•ot-Way Total LIDNo. MapBTaxLotNo. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) 224 1S133DC 06400 Max L. 6c Amy 13350 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 J. Schaefer Drive Tigard, OR 97223 225 1S133DC 06500 Ann K. Suer 13330 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 226 1S133DC 06600 Randal W. & 13310 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ann K. Hart Drive Tigard, OR 97223 227 1S133DC 06700 William R. & 13290 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Margaret C. Drive Davis Tigard, OR 97223 228 1S133DC 06800 Michael L. 13270 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 ' 532.85 0.00 532.85 Underhill Drive Tigard, OR 97223 229 18133DC 07000 Ching Feng & 13295 S.W. Shore Drive 10. 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Yuan Sheng Hu Tigard, OR 97223 230 1S133DC 07100 Steven L. & 11775 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Teresa L. Tigard, OR 97223 Rankin 231 15133DC 07200 Leroy A. 11765 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Solomon Tigard, OR 97223 232 1S133DC 07300 Jeffrey L. & 11755 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911: 532.85 0.00 532.85 Wendi L. Tigard, OR 97223 Heberle 233 1SI33DC 07400 Stephen M. and 11745 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathryn L. Tigard, OR 97223 Schmitz 27 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01-60 Trips PercentoC- Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 234 IS133DC 07500 Robert M. & 11735 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Pamela J. Joy Tigard, OR 97223 235 1S133DC 07600 Ronald J. & 11725 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Maria D. Tigard, OR 97223 Cummings 236 1S133DC 07700 Scott P. & Lisa 11715 S.W.134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Hamel Spencer Tigard, OR 97223 237 18133DC 07800 Timothy P. & 11705 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Rhonda S. Tigard, OR 97223 Quayle 238 1S133DC 07900 Raul E. & Nora 11690 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Madarang Tigard, OR 97223 239 1S133DC 08000 Jeffrey S. & 11700 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Genalee Tigard, OR 97223 Findlay 240 IS133DC 08100 Gordon L. & 11710 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Cleo A. Tigard, OR 97223 McLeod 241 1S133DC 08300 Jerry and 11720 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynne M. Wade Tigard, OR 97223 242 1S133DC 08400 Kevin P. & 11730 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Colleen B. Tigard, OR 97223 Holmstrom 243 1S133DC 08500 Dennis P. & 11740 S.W. 134th Terrace 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Michelle R. Tigard, OR 97223 Harrold 244 1S133DC 08600 Lee W. Davis 13255 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Barbara C. Tigard, OR 97223 Norlin i 28 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01.60 Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Trips Perc Total Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 245 1S133DC 08700 Marshall J. & 13245 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lori D. Miller Tigard, OR 97223 246 1S133DC 08800 Mark R. & Lisa 13235 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 K. Willett Tigard, OR 97223 247 1S133DC 08900 Mark A. 13225 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911' 532.85 0.00 532.85 Bowgren Tigard, OR 97223 248 1S133DC 09100 Bruce D. & 13215 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathleen A. Tigard, OR 97223 Menzies 249 1S133DC 09300 Ronna G. Pies 13205 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 97223 250 1S133DC 09400 Debra Ann 9530 S.W. McDonald 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Schowalter Tigard, OR 97224 251 1S133DC 09500 Mark C. & 13185 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kristin A. Tigard, OR 97223 Nuttle 252 1S133DC 09600 Mark A. & 13175 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Thelma I. Tigard, OR 97223 English 253 1S133DC 09700 Byron L. & 13165 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Cathey K. Tigard, OR 97223 Swanson 254 1S133DC 09800 Tim W. & 13155 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Roxann M. Tigard, OR 97223 Stockton 255 1S133DC 09900 Randall K. & 13145 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Virginia K. Tigard, OR 97223 Brinker 29 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) 256 1S133DC 10000 Madeline C. E. 13135 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Vincent Tigard, OR 97223 257 1S133DC 10100 Robert J. & 13125 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911: 532.85 0.00 532.85 Cynthia A. Tigard, OR 97223 Kroon 258 1S133DC 10200 Donald C. do 13210 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Stephanie C. Drive Winslow Tigard, OR 97223 259 1S133DC 10300 Michael David 13220 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & La Shel Rena Drive Holton Tigard, OR 97223 260 1S133DC 10400 Larry J. & Lisa 13230 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 A. Wise Drive Tigard, OR 97223 261 1S133DC 10500 Michael K. & 13240 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Mary L. Stock Drive Tigard, OR 97223 262 1S133DC 10600 Thomas M. 13235 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kroner & Drive Sherry Tigard, OR 97223 Simmons 263 1S133DC 10700 Raymond L. be 13325 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Patricia A. Drive . Davis Tigard, OR 97223 264 1S133DC 10800 Janet K. Pettit 13215 S.W. Brittany 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drive Tigard, OR 97223 265 1S133DC 10900 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Homes Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 30 or •53 1: MEN i CITY OF TIGARD, S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01.60 Basic Right-or-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Trips Percent o!•) Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 266 1S133DC 11000 Cynthia Joanne 13309 S.W. Shore Drive 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Hurd & Darrel Tigard, OR 97223 G. Shereck 267 1S133DC 11100 Albert R. & 10202 S.W. Conestoga #7 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Zella L. Scholz Beaverton, OR 97005 268 1S133DC 11200 Nancy 13387 S.W, Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Blangsted & Tigard, OR 97223 Charlene Ferger 269 1S133DC 11300 Craig A. and 13401 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Linda L. Baese Tigard, OR 97223 270 1S133DC 11400 Scottco 11665 S.W. 98th Ave. 10 0,08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Building & Tigard, OR 97223 Design, Inc. 271 1S133DC 11500 Michael N. & 13445 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Susan F. Tigard, OR 97223 Shopmeyer 272 1S133DC 11600 Randall G. & 13467 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911: 532.85 0.00 532.85 Verna Marie Tigard, OR 97223 Scott 273 IS133DC 11700 Ralph E. and 13489 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 j Cherie A. Tigard, OR 97223 Merwin 274 1S133DC 11800 Andrew C. & 13486 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janine L. Tigard, OR 97223 Brehm ` 275 1S133DC 11900 Carl V. & 13478 S.W. Laurmont Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kathleen A. Tigard, OR 97223 Gioia 31 OF 53 r . 15~8.O1.60 Total ASSESSMENT ROLL Itt¢bt-otway Assessment FINAL Basic Assessment (5) j]E L•1'D• Percentot•l Assessment ' S.W.135TH AVEN Trips 532.85 OF TIGARD Address Gen. Total (s) CITY 0.00 532.$5 - FirstName 10 0.08911 LID~o- Map~T"LotN.o. Laurmont Ct. W• ~ 13434 5.Og 97223 0.00 532.85 C 12000 William Tigard, 532.85 216 1S133D Rhonda 3• 14 0,08911 532.85 Elz.ie S•W • Laurmont Ct• 0.00 13412 OR 97223 532.85 12100 Matthew E. Tigard, 10 4.08911 532.85 277 1S133DC Maleta 20560 S.V. imperial Lane 0.04 San T. 6C 97406 532.85 1S133DC 12200 Virding Alohaj OR 10 0.08911 ' 532.85 278 Melody S.W, Shore Drive 0,00 L. 13367 OR 97223 532.85 12300 L. Bret bt Tigard, 10 0.08911 ' 53 279 1S133DC D. Houston S. W. Shore Drive 0.00 13350 2.85 OR 97228 532.85 C 12400 Gerald R• Tigard, 10 0.08911 532.85 280 1S133D Rouleau 38 S,W, Shore Drive 0.00 133 OR 97223 532.85 12500 Jerry W• Tigard, 10 0.08911 281 1S133DC Woodin W. Shore Drive & 13326 S• 532.85 William G• Tigard, OR 97223 0.00 12600 532.85 282 1S133DC Michelle R. 10 0.08911 Antunes Shore Drive 532.85 13314 S.V. 87223 0.00 12700 David C• Tigard, 532.85 283 1S133DC Lori K• 10 p08911 Ulbrieht 13302 S•W • Shore Drive 532.85 Bohn R. be Tigard: OR 97223 0.00 12800 532.85 284 IS 33D! Laurie G• 10 0.08911 Schilling 13290 Shore Drive 532,85 S• p.00 C 12900 Michael D. & Tigar OR 97223 d, 532.85 285 1S133D Melanie G• 10 0.08911 Osborne W, Shore Drive Nareth 13268 S•OR 97223 13000 Tox a Tigard, 286 1S133DC C. Doun is 3,2 op 53 t' 15h8•d1-60 Total ENT ROLL Rtght ot.W aY pssossment NAL AS5E5SM Basle psseasment t5) ts) 532.85 ENE ~,.I.D• ~X 'NIPS PeYCentat psse t8) en A Total 0,00 AR,D S,W • 1~`oTx pddcess Gen. 532•95 CITY ofTYG 10 0.08911 532.85 girstName S•W • Sh Drive Map &'Tax Lot N o• ore 0.00 0 13236 9'(223 532.85 LIDS Roger Tigard) OR 10 0.08911 A• ~ 532 C 13100 Christie L. .85 28'1 1S133D Shore Drive 0.00 Suss 13223 5•og 9.1223 532,85 532.85 Randall F Tigard , • 10 0.08911 0.00 1$133DC 13200 Gina Rae 288 W. Shore Dave 532,85 Crosby 13212 S•92223 j0 4.08911 532,85 OR Tigard, 13300 white otton 13200 Tiga S'W, Shore Drive 0,00 R 97223 532.85 532.85 289 3orn R. be Tigard, O 10 0,08911 0.p0 290 . 532.85 15135DC 13~Q0 Sonya K• Drive Meehan 13198 S'W Shore 97223 4.08911 85 & Tigard, OR 10 532' C 13500 Daniel B Reid S.W .Shore Drive 0.00 291 1S133D 3ulie A• 13186 21223 532.85 532.85 Arthur p. & Tigard, OR 10 0.08911 C 13600 0.00 1S133D Barbara A• W. Shore Drive 532.85 292 Miller 1312 5. R 97223 0'08911 85 . 6L Martin G• Tigard, O 10 532. 13700 C ollar W, Shore Drive O,pO 1S133DC 3ulie • 13162 S. 9223 532.85 293 Tigard, oR 532.85 0.08911 C 13800 Lloyd B. U. 10 0.00 ore Drive 15133D Terrie M. 294 Tanaka . Sr 532.85 131585• oR 91223 4.08911 13900 Craig R' Tigard, Shore Drive 10 532.85 , Sh 0.40 1S133DC Collins 13149 S.W 9.1223 532.85 295 1~0p4 Dale A• Tigard' oR 10 0.08911 15133DC Kathryn M• 34 S•W • Shore Drive 296 Bowman 131 OR 91223 Gary T, & Tigard, 292 1S133DC 14140 Kjmberl3 A' ~ Doug tr y 3 OF 5 • r` , MEN 154g.o1.6Q Total Rht.ot WaY Assement A55ESgMEN Basic pssasgn1ent ts) 532.85 N v E L.I,D, FINAL Trips percent or Arse is ent AVE Toil 0,00 OF TIC OLD S.W • 135TH Address Gen. 532.85 CITY 0.08911. 532.85 . FirstlQame 10 0.00 he. Shore Drive 532.85 Map&TaxLot 13122 5.W. LIDlQo. OR t D 91223 0.08911 Tigard, 10 532.85 C 14200 DwighGraf Lake Brett D • W , W inter 0.04 298 11583 S. 532.85 Randall Hamar Dr. OR 91223 0.0$911 1S133DC 14304 Lisa M. Tigard, Laye 10 . 299 W ,Winter 11602 S. avid Dr. 91223 15133DC 14400 Stephanie A• Tigard, OR 300 Evans 34 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percentoti Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 301 1S133DC 14500 Walter Gary & 11021 S.W. Winterlake 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ericka Regina Drive Hoffman Tigard, OR 97223 302 2S14A 00501 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 435 3.87631 23,179.17 0.00 23,179.17 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-1 2S14AB 08900 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 ; 266.46 0.00. 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-2 2S14AB 09000 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-3 2S14AB 09100 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-4 2S14AB 09200 Robert J. & 12485 S.W. 128th Ave. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Verna M. Tigard, OR 97223 Domzalski 302-5 2S14AB 09300 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-6 2S14AB 09400 James R. Hart 12228 S.W. 131st Ave. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Tigard, OR 97223 302-7 2S14AB 09500 D W D P.O. Box 23454 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Contractors, Tigard, OR 97223 Inc. 302-8 2S14AB 09600 James R. Hart 12228 S.W. 131st Ave. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Tigard, OR 97223 35 OF 53 15 8.01.60 Total sic RiQht•ot•Wag Assessment ~ A5SE55MENT ROLL NAL sment (S) sses NUS' L-1-D. Pereentot9 Assessment A (S) 135TH AVE Trlps Total ts) 266.46 CITY4F 0.00 Gen RD TIGA Address - 266.46 • FirstNa'ne 5 0.04456 ap&. B%Lotro• 46 LIDTr'o. M 501 g.E. Hawthorne Blvd• 0.00 266. $enj. Franklin P•0• Box 6400 64p4 266.46 09'140 97228' 0.04456 302-9 2S14AB Dev. Co. Portland, OR Blvd• 5 Hawthorne 0.00 266.46 Franklin 501 .Box 6400 6400 266.46 09800 Beni. -P.O. 97228- 2S14AB Dev. Co' portland: OR 5 0.04456 302-10 Benish AVe' 266.46 13145 S•wR 94223 0.00 3armila 1" Tigard, O 266.46 2S14AB 09900 K• 5igurd 5 0.04456 302-11 Rislov 132nd Ct. 266.46 12374 S•OR 97223 0.00 Donald C• Tigard, 266.46 2S14AB 10000 Marie M• 5 0. 04456 302-17 orris 132nd Ct. 266.46 M 12356 S•OA 97228 0.00 Calvin F• Tigard, 266.46 2S14AB 10100 Rose M. 5 4.04456 266.46 302-13 Woolery 132nd Ct• 0.00 12334 S.W ' 266.46 Morse B. Tigard, OR 97223 5 0.04456 2S14AB 10200 Stewart 132nd Ct. 266.46 302-14 12300 S'~:R g7228 0.00 Fred 3. 51 Tigard, 266.46 2S14AB 10300 Pauline M• 5 0.04456 302-15 111ojer 170th: #2797 266.46 3280 S.W• 97006 0.00 Stephen R• $eeverton, OR 266.46 2S14AB 10400 Elizabeth A• 5 0.04456 302-16 Hoff man 132nd Ct• 266'46 12343 S•OR 97223 0.00 Timothy Lloyd Tigard, 266.46 2S14AB 10500 ~ Lori B. 5 4.04456 302-17 Medlin wthorne Blvd. 501 5 Benj. 'Franklin .7~• Ha 6400 P,0Box 6400 87228- 302_18 2S14AB 10600 Dev. CO- Portland, OR 3 6 OF 53 15~8'dl•6~~ ~a~ t ~ RpI,L ati8hti•ot w ay Assessmen ~N AL ASSES5~EN ga$ta Assessment ts) n~ Assossment tS+) 266,46 ot'PBYGG p0 ts266.46 0.. 135,rK AV~NUEL,~D• ess Gen. -Tote., D S,W • AaaY C 266.46 ITY pFTIGAR FirstN ar~e 5 0.04456 E• ,xawthorne Blvd. 0,00 Map & T aX I,o~,No. 266.46 `o. 501 LID : Franklin ox 6OR 9112S-640 .0.04456 Benj. g.0•B 46 B1Og00 2S14A Dev• G°. gortland' lyd. 5 0.00 thorne B 302-1g 501 S.E• Kaw 266.46 .2 g7228'64QQ 0p4456 266.46 Franklin g• o0r• Boxtland, 6OR 0.00 2S14AB 10800 Dey• Go' ut St• 5 18235 342'20 S• R• gg007~ 266.46 Robert 3 • & 110 0 5 0.04466 266.46 vatt 266. 0.00 B er 0 S,W Morning Will -21 2S14A8109p0 K%°de D 302 46 1233 Carol W • Dr. OR. 82223 5 0,04456 266,46 2S14A811000 Rickards Tigard, wtrorne Blvd. 0.00 302_22 lIs 266,46 501 S.E• Franklin 'P.O. Box 11100 OR 9722gr64p0 0,04456 Dev , Go• gortland, 5 266.46 2S14AB xawtrorne Blyd. 0.00 302-23 Y OSgox 6400 6444 266.46 $enj. Franklin OR gg228' 0.04456 266,46 2514A8 11200 Dey• CO. g°rtl ~ ,w • $eayerton_ 5 66.46 0.00 302-24 9363 Kwy' 05 2 QO D , pnderson, Hillsdale OTL 970 5 2S14pB 113 0,p4456 266.46 111c, Beaverton, 0.00 302,26 ' W Beaverton- 9363S• 266,46 E Anderslillsdale , Kwy• 87005 0.04456 268,46 2S14AB 11400 D Beaverton, p 5 . Inc. Beaverton' 0.00 302'26 9363 $•W •Kwy. 266.46 B Anderson, lillsdale OR g7405 5 0,04456 D ton, f _ ~ 2S14A811504 Inc, Seaver Beaverton- 302 2 8363 S'W . E Anderson, Hillsdale gwy• D Og 9g005 2S14A8 11600 lnc Beaverton, 302-28 OF 53 . -Now CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01-60 Basic Right•o(•Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Trips Percent of Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (5) (S) 302-29 2S14AB 11700 D E Anderson, 9363 S.W. Beaverton- 5 0.04456 266.46 0100 266.46 Inc. Hillsdale Hwy. Beaverton, OR 97005 302-30 2S14AB 11800 H B & Virginia 3700 S.W. Ranch Ct. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 L. Boone Portland, OR 97221 302-31 2S14AB 11900 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456' 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-32 2S14AB 12000 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-33 2S14AB 12100 Steven W. & 4200 S.W. 107th, #3404 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Beverly J. Beaverton, OR 97005 Johnson 302-34 2S14AB 12200 Edmund H. & 13192 S.W. Benish 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Patricia M. Tigard, OR 97223 Berger 302-35 2S14AB 12300 Marguerite A. 13150 S.W. Benish St. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Hellsten Tigard, OR 97223 302-36 2S14AB 12400 Charlotte J. & 13116 S.W. Benish St. 5 0.04456 266.46 0.00 266.46 Elizabeth V. Tigard, OR 97223 Jankus Hopper 302-37 2S14AB 04700 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 55 0.49011 2,930.71 0.00 2,930.71 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 302-38 2S14AB 04702 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 60 0.53466 3,197.11 0.00 3,197.11 Dev. Co. P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 38 OF. 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Basic Right-of-way Total LID:ro, Map&TaxLot No. FirstName Address Trips Percentof•t Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (s) (s) (s) 303 2S14AB 00100 Robert H. 12030 S.W. 135th Avenue 109 0.97131 5,808.14 12,292.22 18,100.36 Sunamoto Tigard, OR 97223 304 2S14AB 00200 Raymond F. & 11975 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Wendy S. Lee Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 305 2S14AB 00201 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 306 2S14AB 00300 Alan F. & 11985 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Barbara J. Gits Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 307 2S14AB 00400 Russel S. & 11995 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lynda P. Dr. Lockrem Tigard, OR 97223 308 2S14AB 00500 James H. & 12005 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Marie E. Dr. Parsley Tigard, OR 97223 309 2S14AB 00600 David E. & 12065 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Virginia F. Dr. Waind Tigard, OR 97223 310 2S14AB 00700 Effie Pauline 13295 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Roberts Ridge Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 311 2S14AB 00800 Lawrence H. 13315 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Carol M. Ridge Ct. Snyder Tigard, OR 97223 312 2S14AB 00900 Casey J. & 13335 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Bonnie A. Ridge Ct. Rushing Tigard, OR 97223 39' OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD, S.W.135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percentorl Basic Right-or-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 313 2S14AB 01000 Scott M. & 13355 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Barbara A. Ridge Ct. Yale Tigard, OR 97223 314 2S14AB 01100 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 315 2S14AB 01200 Donald H. 13330 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Cummins Ridge Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 316 2S14AB 01300 Albert & Alice 1613 Broadway 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Klatt Vancouver, WA 98663 317 2S14AB 01400 Timothy, Craig 13290 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Steven R. Ridge Ct. Stevens Tigard, OR 97223 318 2S14AB 01500 William M. & 13270 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol R. Ridge Ct. Johnson Tigard, OR 97223 319 2S14AB 01600 Douglas J. & 970 S.W. Mark Street 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Joyce Kimmel Newport, OR 97365 320 2S14AB 01700 Douglas J. & 970 S.W. Mark Street 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Joyce Kimmel Newport, OR 97365 321 2S14AB 01800 Jeff J. Lassle 13235 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 , 532.85 Ridge Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 322 2S14AB 01900 Jagdish G. 13230 S.W. Aberdeen 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Hemrajani Place Tigard, OR 97223 40 OF 53 . z• 158.01.60 Total FIN AL ASSESSMENT R OLa sic Right•or•WaY Assessment ••D• IAssessment (S) 135TH AVENUE L Trips Percentori Assessment (s) TIGARD S•w' Total (s) 53~ Q,00 CITY OF Address Gen- FirstName 10 4.08911 0,00 Map & Tax Lot N o. Hillsdale LID NO- 9055 S.W. $ea~•_ 'Morning Hill 87225 2S14AB 01990 Owners Hw~• 323 Home Portland, OR Association 0.00 532.85 By W edgewood 532.85 Homes of 10 0.08911 Portland 10900 S.M. 26th Place, 532.85 0,00 02000 Carl H.Brown #13 OR 87223 532.85 324 2S14A8 Laura L. Tigard, 0.08911 12184 S.W • Morning gill 10 4.00 532.85 Roger J. & Dr. OR 97223 532.85 2S14A8 02100 Deborah E. Tigard, 0,08911 325 Spring Hill 14 12196 S.W.rning 0.04 532.85 02200 John F. & Vera Dr. OR 92223 532.85 326 2S14 AB J. Rush Tigard, 10 0.08911 Hill 12203 S.W. Morning 0.00 532.85 John A• & Dr. 532.85 327 2SJVA 02300 Janet E. Gillis Tigard, OR 97223 14 0.08911 gill 12210 S.W • Morning 532,85 K, Gordon & 0.00 02400 Scott Dr. OR 91223 532.85 328 ZS14A8 Teri L. Tigard, morning 10 0,08911 Hill 12220 S.W. 0.00 532.85 S14A8 42500 Michael R. Dr. , OR 92223 532.85 329 2 Teriann Kruse Tlga rd 10 4.08911 0.00 532.85 12232 S.W • Marring 8111 02604 John D. & Dr- OR 91223 532.85 330 2514 NB Victoria L• Tigard, 10 4.08911 Bowden Morning gill 02700 Eileen G. Rowe 12240 S•W• Dr. OR 92223 331 2S14A8 Tigard, 41 pg 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W- 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01-60 Basic Right-of-way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Trips Percent of Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) 332 2S14AB 02800 Randal E. & 12252 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Helen A. Dr. Kashka Tigard, OR 97223 333 ZS14AB 02900 Steven M. & 12264 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Shawn M. Dr. Lesperance Tigard, OR 97223 334 2S14AB 03000 Benj. Franklin 970 S.W. Mark 0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 Development, Newport, OR 97365 Inc. 335 2S14AB 03001 H and K 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 0 0.00000: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investors Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 336 2S14AB 03100 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 337 2S14AB 03200 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 338 2S14AB 03300 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911. 532.85 0.00 532.85 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 339 2S14AB 03400 H and K 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0108911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Investors Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 340 2S14AB 03500 Ronald R. & 13367 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janice E. Dr. Richardson Tigard, OR 97223 341 2S14AB 03600 Sandra K. 13379 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 McConnell Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 42 OF 53 i 1548.01-60 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL xtght•of•was Total CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. Haste Assessment Assessment Trips Percent of I Assessment tS) First Name Address Gen. Total (S) tS) LID To. yjap & Tax Lot No. 532.85 0.00 532.85 342 2S14AB 03700 Dominique & 13405 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 Marion Dr. Alexander Tigard, OR 97223 0.00 532.85 10 0.08911 532.85 343 2S14AB 03800 Richard G. & 13425 S.W. Scotts Bridge Carol E. York Dr. 85 Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 0'00 532. 8115 S.W. 61st 2S14AB 03900 Adam, Portland, OR 97219 344 Gertrude M & Esther L. Shepsman & James A. 532.85 Hart 532 10 0.08911 345 .85 0.00 2S14AB 04000 Robert F. & 13370 S.W. Scotts Bridge Claudia A. Rd' Tigard, OR 97223 0.00 532.85 Tinsman 10 0,08911 532.85 Country Club Rd. 346 2S14AB 04100 Stephen T. 525 Lake Oswego, Club d. 0.00 532.85 OR 97034 Spiels 10 0.08911 532.85 2514AB 04200 Dennis M. & 4547 Treeside Ct., NE 347 Janice M. Salem, OR 97305 0.00 532.85 McMahon 10 0.08911 532.85 2S14AB 04300 Kevin R. & P.O. Box 230535 348 Donna M. Tigard, OR 97223 White 0..0r~ 535 Yv4se1~ et~-~e 0 ~ H-01 -Dr. ' 532.85 0.00 532.85 349A 2S14AB 08400 Wedgewood 13250 S.W. Falcon Rise 10 0.08911 Homes, Inc. Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 43 OF 53 . CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548-01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (s) 349E 2S14AB 08500 Betty Jo Smith 13439 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911. 532.85 0.00 532.85 Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 349C 2S14AB 08600 Gregory W. & 13444 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 ' 532.85 0.00 532.85 Debbie Seybold Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 349D 2S14AB 08700 Troy Allen do 13436 S.W. Scotts Bridge 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tania Kay Dr. Palmer Tigard, OR 97223 349E 2S14AB 08800 Robert L. 1723 N.W. Glisan 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Elliott Portland, OR 97209 350 2S14AB 04501 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Development, P.O. Box 6400 Inc. Portland, OR 97228-6400 351 2S14AB 04600 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Development, P.O. Box 6400 Inc. Portland, CR 97228-6400 352 2S14AB 04700 Benj. Franklin 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Development, P.O. Box 6400 Inc. Portland, OR 97228-6400 353 2S14AB 04800 Daniel D. do 13172 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Sharon L. Ridge St. Gorman Tigard, OR 97223 354 2S14AB 04900 David B. do 13158 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Jean T. Cory Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 355 2S14AB 05000 John M. be 13136 S.W. Chimney 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Monica L. Ridge St. Collins Tigard, OR 97223 44 OF 53 1548-01.60 T ,R,QLL Total MEN glght-of, Way Assessment FINAL ASSESS Basic Assessment tsl L.I.D. Trips Percentoll Assessment tSl IGARD SY.135TH AVENUE Total (s) 532.85 Gen. 4,00 CITY OFT Address 532.85 FirstName 14 p,q$911 D4aP&TaxLot?vo. S.W. Chimney 532.85 LID NO- • 13114 0.00 Vance W• Ridge St. 53 356 2.85 2S14AB 05100 3oyee L. Tigard, OR 97223 10 4,08911 Collins 13098 S•W • Chimney 0.00 532.85 Donald K• Ridge S OR 92223 532.85 2S14AB 05200 Karen L. Tigard, 14 4.08911 357 venue 85 532.85 Trachsel ouglas 12223 S.W. 131st A 0.00 D 05300 Larry Tigard, OR 92223 532. ` 2S14A8 ~ pmeda Lyn 14 0.08911 532.85 358 Miller venue 0.00 , 12235 S. 'W. 223 532.85 rt Tigard, 10 0,08911 Robe R 2S14AB 05400 359 Michelle K°Pa Avenue 4,40 532.85 Bruce, 12257 S •W• 131st 92223 Robert B Tigard, OR 532,85 360 2S14AB 05500 3r. Marcia L• 0,08911 Williams 131st Avenue 10 532.85 12279 OR gg223 0'00 Mitchell M. & Tigard, 532.85 361 2S14A8 05600 Dona L• 10 0.08911 532.85 4.00 McLain S•W, 131st Avenue Susan 12288 OR 97223 532.85 Robert & Tigard, 10 0.08911 2S14AB 05700 Gardner 131st Avenue 532.85 362 & 12274 S• W' 97223 0.00 AB 05800 Douglas M' Tigard, OR 532.85 363 2514 3o1c venue 10 0.08911 532.85 Stanley 122425• 131st A 4,00 W' 92223 532.85 05900 Douglas & Tigard, OR 14 0.08911 532.85 2S 4o Glenda Hels' 131st Avenue 0.00 364 400 Jim B. Hart Tigard, •OW• R 97223 enue 10 0.0$911 532•85 2514A8 06 W • 131st Av 365 12206 S• 46100 Hal C. & Tigard, OR 97223 366 2S14A8 Joanne A. W igBins y or 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of, Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map 8: Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (5) (5) 367 2S14AB 06200 Randall R. & 12184 S.W. 131st Avenue 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Debra J. Orem Tigard, OR 97223 368 2S14AB 06300 Brad & Laura 12162 S.W. 131st Avenue 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Millican Roast Tigard, OR 97223 369 ZS14AB 06400 James M. & 12148 S.W. 131st Avenue 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Cindy A. Wong Tigard, OR 97223 370 2S14AB 06500 Alice H. Salmi 12086 S.W. 131st Avenue 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tigard, OR 9722; 371 2S14AB 06600 William S. & 13023 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911. 532.85 0.00 532.85 Martha M. Tigard, OR 97223 Tibbetts 372 2S14AB 06700 Mary 13045 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Katherine Tigard, OR 97223 Crabtree 373 2S14AB 06800 William J. & 13067 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Janice E. Tigard, OR 97223 Gonsalves 374 2S14AB 06900 Priscilla A. 13089 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Miller Tigard, OR 97223 375 2S14AB 07000 James B. & 13121 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Anne L. Thayer Tigard, OR 97223 376 2S14AB 07100 James T. & 13143 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 ' 532.85 Debra K. Tigard, OR 97223 Kelloff 377 2S14AB 07200 David Keith & 13165 S.W. Katherine St. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Karen M. Tigard, OR 97223 Colby 46 OF 53 Total ASSE55ENT R OLL Basic ftAssessm n Assessment ~INAI~ percentot Assessment (S) 532.85 UE A AVEN p• s Total (5) Gen. o.oa Address pFTIGARD S•w.135T 532.85 CITY 10 0.48911 5g2.85 FirstTan1e QO W • • q, Map Tax Lot Katherine St LIDNo. 81 S. 131 99223 532.85 & Tigard, OB' Donald E• 0.08911 01300 10 318 2S1 4AB Julie -n Katherine St' 532.85 Brunk hart 13198 S'0R 99223 0.00 3ames 3• Tigard, 532.85 2S14AB 01440 Schlotleldt 10 0.08911 532.85 319 Kathy F' 0.00 5 W . Katherine 5t. 532.85 $erning 13146 OR 91223 0.08911 Christine LTigard+ 10 532.85 5t. q.0e 4AB 01500 Berger S.W .Katherine 380 2S1 13134 87223 532.85 James C. Sloan Tigard, 0? 2S14AB 41600 10 0.08911 532.85 ~ Patrick A• Avenue 381 •W, 4,04 p,ndrus 128th 5 1229 s 6c GR 99223 53 Rog 2.85 er C• Tigard' 10 4.08911 2.85 382 2S14AB 47900 Dianne S. 53 31st Avenue 0.00 heath 12015 S'Qg199223 532.85 Robin T. & Tigard, 0,48911 4AB 49800 R° 14 $32.85 2S1 p,nita G• 4.p0 W . Chitnney 383 Q+N eill 13169S. 532.85 R, Lyle Ridge St' 99223 0.08911 85 2S14AB 08300 Pamela S• Tigard, OR 10 532• 384 Chimney 0.00 Laverty 13149 S.W. 532.85 Ridge St' 97223 0,08911 532.85 2514AB 08200 Pamela B. Kirk Tigard, OR 10 385 S.W. Chimney 4.00 13125 532.85 Bernard Ridge S OR 97223 ard, 10 0.08911 2S14AB 08100 Genevieve C. Tig , 386 Burke 13143 S•W' Chimney 400 Randall L. Ridge S OR 91223 2S14AB 08 Linda L• Tigard, 38T p,dams 4^ ~g 53 154g•Q1.6Q °a ENT ROLL Total FINAL ASSESSM Basic Right•ot•K`ay Assessment VENUE L•I•D' Trips Percentot Assessment (S) Assesstent (s) CITY OF TIGARD Sy. 135TH A Address Gen. Total t51 0.00 532.85 FirstName 532.85 LID No. Map&Ta%L°tNo. 10 0,08911 Gary D. Florey 13091 S.W. Chimney 37,353.15 2S14AB 07900 Ridge S t- 388 87223 0'00 388 Tigard, 701 6.24666 37,353.15 223 Green Mt.Drive 82260 00100 Walter West palm Desert, C 389 2514BA 23:925.19 Corp. 0.00 c/o Ruth D. 4.00107 23,925.19 .00 lieldf and Rt. 1 Box 792 449 2,237.96 , 0 Margery Beaverton, OR 97007 2,237.96 390A 2S14B 00101 Krueger 42 0.37426 12133 S.W• 135th 00200 Stephen 3• Tigard, OR 97223 532.85 391 2S14BA peterschmidt 0.00 & Vicki D. 532.$5 Friday 10 0.08911 12098 S.W. Westbury 532.85 2S14BA 00300 Linda R• Terrace 0.00 392 Delucia Tigard, OR 97223 10 0.08911 532.85 12032 S.W• Westbury 00 532.85 00400 Gary L• ~ Lisa 0. 2S14BA A, Hammer Terrace OR 97223 532,85 393 Tigard, 10 0.08911 P. S.W. Westbury 2S14BA 00500 Thomas P• & TerraceOR 87223 532.85 394 Roxanne Tigard, 0.00 Robert 3• 532.85 Cuyler 10 0.08911 0,00 532.85 K. P'O' Box p25571 7225 532.85 395 2S14BA 00600 James Portland, 10 0.08911 McGehee Westbury Ann R• 12098 S.W. 00700 Mary Terrace 396 2S14BA Coon Tigard, OR 97223 53 48 O'F 1548•~~'60 Total s'° ~Assessm nt Assessment ASSESSMENT POLL FINAL cs~ L,I,D• s percentot' Assessment (S) 135TH AVFr1UE Trtp Total ts) $32.85 CITY OF TIGARD S'W' Aaaress Gen. 532.85 0,00 C FirstName 10 0.08911 Mapg,Ta%LotN0. W• Westbury 532.85 LID?No. 12112 S• 0,00 Patrick, Terrace 0R 87223 532'85 2S14BA 00800 gpinuxzi & Tigard: 10 0.08911 397 3ulie Geonetta Box 25571 'P.O. 97225 00900 James K• Portland, OR 398 2614BA McGehee 49 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.T.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) 401 2S14BA01200 Vito N. 12232 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Piscitelli Tigard, OR 97223 402 2S14BA01300 Rhonda M. 12254 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Bennett Tigard, OR 97223 403 2S14BA01400 Brian V. & R. 13858 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Diane Pilmer Tigard, OR 97223 404 2S14BA01500 Amir M. Fatehi 13870 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Carol L. Tigard, OR 97223 Cutting 405 IS14BA01600 Robert M. 13892 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Odell, Jr. Tigard, OR 97223 406 2S14BA 01700 Kenneth C. & 13918 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carla C. Tigard, OR 97223 Johnson 407 2S1413A 01800 Gordon L., Jr. 13923 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 & Deborah K. Tigard, OR 97223 Damron 408 2S14BA 01900 Robert F. & 13901 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911• 532.85 0.00 532.85 A Cathleen L. Tigard, OR 97223 Draga 409 2S14BA 02000 Herb 10400 S.W. Allen Blvd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Morissette Beaverton, OR 97005 Builders, Inc. 410 2114BA 02100 Kathryn C. 13847 S.W. Hindon Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Dorsett Tigard, OR 97223 411 2S1413A 02200 Kevin L. & 12083 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0108911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carol J. Dunn Tigard, OR 97223 50 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percentof. Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) (S) (S) 412 2S14BA 02300 David A. & 12061 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Margaret S. Tigard, OR 97223 Rickard 413 2S14BA 02400 Steven A. & 12049 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0108911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Margaret Lynn Tigard, OR 97223 Klein 414 2S14BA 02500 David K. & 13874 S.W. Crist Ct. 10 0.08911 532,85 0.00 532.85 Mary Patricia Tigard, OR 97223 Booth 415 2S14BA 02600 Bill M. & 13916 S.W. Crist Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Debbie L. Tigard, OR 97223 Lamers 416 2S14BA 02700 John F. & 13938 S.W. Crist Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kristi A. Tigard, OR 97223 Phillips 417 1S133CD 08600 Paul G. & 13909 S.W. Crist Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kristine M. Tigard, OR 97223 Welty 418 1S133CD 08700 Matthew H. & 13887 S.W. Crist Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Ilene R. Miller Tigard, OR 97223 419 1S133CD 08800 Richard J. & 13865 S.W. Crist Ct. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Lisa M. Perry Tigard, OR 97223 420 1S133CD 08900 Jerry M. & 12027 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0100 532.85 Barbara M. Tigard, OR 97223 Thomas 421 1S133CD 09000 Gary T. & 11747 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Debra J. Drive Bourson Tigard, OR 97223 51 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1548.01.60 Trips Percent of Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (S) 422 1S111CD 09100 Thor D. & 11763 S.W. Morning Hill 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Brandi L. Drive Dorsett Tigard, OR 97223 423 1S133CD 09200 Daniel E. & 11992 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kimberly C. Tigard, OR 97223 Grimberg 424 1S133CD 09300 David D. & 12014 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Tracey J. Tigard, OR 97223 Henderson 425 ZS14BA 02800 Margaret A. 12036 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Wilson Tigard, OR 97223 426 2S14BA 02900 Norma R. 12058 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Nordyke Tigard, OR 97223 427 2S14BA 03000 Mark T. & 12070 S.W. Wilton Ave. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Margaret E. Tigard, OR 97223 Sammons 428 2S14BA 03100 John & Mae R. 12181 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Hong Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 429 2S1411A 03200 Richard A. & 12169 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Kendra J. Terrace Steph Tigard, OR 97223 430 2S14BA 03300 Kevin L. 12087 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Bartholomew Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 431 2S14BA 03400 James K. P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 McGehee Portland, OR 97225 52 OF 53 CITY OF TIGARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE L.I.D. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 1545-01.60 Trips Percent of ; Basic Right-of-Way Total LID No. Map & Tax Lot No. First Name Address Assessment Assessment Assessment Gen. Total (5) 432 2S14BA 03500 Herb 10400 S.W. Allen Blvd. 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Morissette Beaverton, OR 97005 Builder, Inc. 433 2S14BA 03600 James K. P.O. Box 25571 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 McGehee Portland, OR 97225 434 1S133CD 09400 Paul S. & Karri 12001 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Carpenter Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 435 1S133CD 09500 Jeffery L. 11985 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Allmer Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 436 1S133CD 09600 Kim Diane 11963 S.W. Westbury 10 0.08911 532.85 0.00 532.85 Drake Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 53 OF 53 AGENDA LTEM # 3 w' VISIT_ ©(t' A1VDA DATE 10%239"9 ' (Limfted to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other i-sues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED )K 5 (ar-055e~yl 105-7(' 5 -5, VV. Mrk' /-I Gj~i'1 ~Gtl~C DATE 10/23/89 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) PERSONS WILL BE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS. 3~3 Item Description: AGENDA ITEM.NO. 5'':- PUBLIC:` HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-07 4}% ZONE CHANGE 89-07; METZIGER-EMS/ROCKWEELL NPO '#5. Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation ---P/ease 109, 1 100 O A, . A.),Cc i A I~ ( Ce. Cr-2 A eo da ~om ~ r7 DATE 10/23/89 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) PERSONS WILL BE ALLOWED 10 MINUTES FOR PRESENTATIONS. Item Description-. PUBLIC HEARINGCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-08; ZONE CHANGE::89=08;x' GROSS; :,NPO #7: Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation ~ ~ r rSO~J SJp 0~1 t^' 47 ~i Lk) Jr 60 1! 1,JP 'J, WASHINGTON ivla3%a °I CO UNTY, OREGON t October 18, 1989 { 4p P { Patrick J. Reilly City Manager of Tigard 4 P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Pat: I am following up our meeting of last Friday with this letter to provide you and the city with some timelines for the MSTIP projects which directly relate to the City of Tigard. Voters approval to continue this program for another 6 years provides us a unique opportunity to continue the momentum that has been built-up by the MSTIP program to make some necessary and major improvements to the county and city's highway system. The projects underway by the city and MSTIP provide us some very positive opportunities to coordinate and expedite, where possible, improvements to the highway system. Since our meeting, my staff has had an opportunity to meet with ODOT staff to discuss Bull Mountain Road/Canterbury Lane, Scholls Ferry Road, Durham Road, and Bull Mountain Road and Greenburg Road overpass projects. Based on these discussions, there are opportunities for us to complete these projects in a timely manner and to get those projects not currently scheduled underway for design. Needless to say with the number of projects that we have, the cash flow of MSTIP 2 serial levy, and the complexity unique to each of the projects, it is not feasible that all of these projects will be constructed tomorrow. However, it is reasonable to believe that with a coordinated effort between the city, the state, and the county we can make significant progress in many areas rather quickly. Rather than providing details of the status of the MSTIP 1 projects and the unique complexities and schedules of each of the MSTIP 2 projects inherent to you in the text of this letter, I felt it was more appropriate to provide this information in an attachment. Project information provided is on Scholls Ferry Road, Bull Mountain/Canterbury Lane, Durham Road, Bull Mountain Road and Greenburg Road overpass. In reviewing the attached project information, please keep in mind that when the MSTIP 2 program was developed, the Tualatin-Sherwood/Edy Road and Murray .Prro a ts-i,f~the,. Blvd. projects were designated to be funded as top priorit-OP 19189 Department of Land Use And Transportation, Administration 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: 503/648-8761 Patrick J. Reilly Page 2 October 18, 1989 levy passed. Combined, the total cost of these two projects is $25.2 million which represents 42 percent of the $60 million MSTIP 2 program. Needless to say, these revenue needs dominate the first few years of the program. This cash flow is basically what has driven the scheduling of the other projects in the program. Also please note that the final scheduling of the MSTIP 2 projects are subject to the WCTCC and Board of County Commissioners approvals. These actions are being planned for November 1989 meetings. In summary, let me state that I, as well as the resources of my department, stand ready to make every effort to facilitate the MSTIP projects in the Tigard area. I would welcone any suggestions you or your staff could make to assist us in making the projects happen in a timely fashion. Sincerely, Bruce A. Wanner, P.E. Director Enclosure BW:JP:celhs BWREILLY MSTIP 1 AND 2 PROJECT STATUS AND DETAILS MSTIP 1 PROJECTS 1. SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD (MURRAY BOULEVARD TO FANNO-CREEK) By October 24, 1989, Washington County and ODOT are planning to finalize negotiations of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the full funding and completion of this project. The main items of agreement in the MOU are that ODOT will fully fund the construction of the project upon the condition that the county take over jurisdiction and maintenance responsibilities of Scholls Ferry Highway, excluding the Highway 217 Interchange. The final action on this agreement is, however, subject to Oregon Transportation Commission and Board of County Commissioners formal approval. The project is currently in the right-of-way acquisition phase and based upon consummation of the above full funding package construction could start in the late 1990 construction season. 2. BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD/CANTERBURY LANE 5 ODOT opened bids for construction of this project on July 29, 1989. Unfortunately, only two bids were received with the low bid being 25 E. percent above ODOT's engineering estimate. After discussions with € County and City of Tigard staffs, the bids were rejected by ODOT. We have met with ODOT staff to discuss the rebidding of this project. They will be rebidding in December 89/January 90 with a completion date of early summer 1990. MSTIP 2 PROJECTS 1. DURHAM ROAD r Once this three-lane improvement is completed between Hall Blvd. and S.W. 72nd, it will complement the City of Tigard's improvement to Durham Road and will provide improved traffic movement in the Tigard-Tualatin area. The current realistic completion of this project is scheduled for late Spring of 1993. This time schedule is due to several major challenges facing the design and construction of this project. These challenges are outlined in the following paragraphs: a. During preliminary engineering, the current alignment will be analyzed for efficiency and safety in terms of traffic movement. If the alignment needs to be changed, environmental, right-of-way (ROW) and financial impacts will need to be determined. Even if ( E. _ F h the alignment is not changed, additional ROW will have to be acquired. And there are several properties which could be severely impacted. In general ROW acquisition is a protracted and sensitive process especially if court condemnation is required. b. This project will require extensive coordination with the railroad and the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to obtain review approvals and work permits for the railroad crossing. As is well known, f: working with the railroad and the PUC can often be a lengthy process under the best of conditions. C. Widening of Fanno Creek bridge will require work in Fanno Creek itself. This action will require an extensive coordination with DEQ, Division of State Lands, State and Federal Fish and Wildlife, Corps of Engineers and other agencies to assess environmental impacts and to develop acceptable environmental and wetlands mitigation. Corps and Fish and Wildlife work permits usually are restrictive as to when work can actually be done in the creek which can affect the project construction schedule. Also, DE*Q's new interim rules for surface water control in the Tualatin River basin will affect the project schedule. d. Since this section of Durham Road is under ODOT's jurisdiction, all work on this project will require coordination and review by ODOT. Furthermore, NOT has a $257,000 bikepath project to be constructed on Durham Road's existing alignment between Hall and Upper-Boones Ferry Road. The bikepaths would be built by simply widening the r existing road shoulders. Unfortunately, this bikepath construction schedule and the Durham Road construction schedule present a real dilemma to us all. In other words, do we ask ODOT, knowing the need and public pressure, to build the bikepaths now, knowing that they will most likely be torn out when Durham Road is widened later? What is in the best interest of the taxpayer? With ODOT, County, City cooperation, we need to make a decision on this soon. e. The issue has been raised about the possibility of combining the MSTIP 2 Durham Road project with the Tigard's Durham Road project scheduled for construction next year. At first glance, combining the two projects would appear to be feasible. However, the reality of the numerous technical challenges and the associated time frames discussed above, it would seem to indicate that it would be extremely difficult to combine the two projects without a serious delay in your project. The opportunity that these two projects do offer is that you and your staff may find it beneficial to take over the entire project management of the project. Your road design standards are much the same as ours and you would have already been dealing with the people in the Durham Road area and know the nuances of their concerns. • -2- dS J f. The issues of right-of-way acquisition, bridge widening, environmental and wetlands mitigation, railroad crossing and work in Fanno Creek should not be considered as negative limitations on the project schedule, but rather a realistic statement of the major tasks that need to be done in order to successfully construct this project. Following is a realistic schedule for work necessary to complete ' Durham Road. F' Preliminary Engineering, - April 1990-Dec. 1991 Environmental Analysis Final Design Right-of-Way Acquisition - Oct. 1991-Dec. 1991 g & PUC Permits Bid Advertisement & Construction - Jan. 1992-May 1993 The above schedule is for the complete project. However, it is F suggested that the county, Tigard, and Tualatin staffs meet to discuss a feasible alignment for the Durham Road extension to S.W. I 72nd as well as how this portion of the project might be j accelerated. F: r. 2. BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD: r.. MSTIP 2 program includes $500,000 for road improvements along Bull Mountain Road. However, no specific project improvements were i identified or proposed in MSTIP 2 since there was no clear list of priority improvements presented by the Bull Mountain neighborhood groups. With passage of the serial levy, the planning process needs to be initiated to start priortizing road improvement needs along Bull Mountain Road in order to reach consensus on what should be constructed with the $500,000. Since the Bull Mountain area is within Tigard's urban planning area, it would seem that this would be a great opportunity for the City to consider taking over the project management responsibilities of this project. In this way, the City could better assure that this road improvement could complement the other urban services planned or being planned for the Bull Mountain area such as outlined in Tigard 's recent circulation analysis. The MSTIP cash flow analysis indicates that the Bull Mountain Road construction will have to be scheduled in 1994. However, if consensus can be reached quickly on the improvements to be built, the County will do whatever is necessary to expedite the schedule of the final design, right-of-way acquisition and construction. € 1 -3- § F 3. GREENBURG ROAD/HWY. 217 OVERPASS: This project, as you're aware, is intended to widen the overpass with two additional lanes. Since the overpass is under the jurisdiction of the State, it will have to be managed by ODOT. Consequently and because of MSTIP 2 voter approval, members of the County and City staffs have met with ODOT's Region 1 staff to discuss the opportunities for including this project in the ODOT six year Highway Improvement Program (HIP) update as part of the overall improvements plans within the Washington Square area. Issues that have been raised during this discussion include: 1. Can the current overpass configuration accommodate a sixth lane on Hwy. 217? If so, is it feasible to do the widening now? If not, what effect will this have on the project widening and when would it be done? Will the overpass have to be reconstructed based on current or future needs and development in this area? The County, City and ODOT staffs will be meeting to discuss and develop solutions within realistic time frames in order to include the overpass project in the ODOT Six-Year HIP update. If the Oregon Transportation Commission a. '-!,roves this project, the completion of the preliminary engineering, final design and right-of-way acquisition phases of this project will mean that the actual construction will not start until 1996. This is a realistic time schedule based on the MSTIP 2 cash flow analysis. However, we will pursue working with NOT to determine if there is any way to creatively finance this project at an earlier date. JPSTATUS/V/ JPSTATSE/Rev. FD "JP" ce&hs -4- ' ,ate of 90 Appree J. CITY OF TIVARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION No. 89-79 WHEREAS, THE CITY OF TIGARD WISHES TO ACKNOWLEDGE A RECENT GIFT OF AN EPSON I-E COMPUTER AND EPSON LQ-510 PRINTER TO THE TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY FROM SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATION; AND WHEREAS, THE CITY FURTHER DESIRES TO EXTEND CONGRATULATIONS ON THE FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATION AT THEIR TIGARD LOCATION; AND WHEREAS, BUSINESSES, SUCH AS SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATION ARE INTEGRAL TO THE CONTINUED VITALITY AND SPIRIT PRESENT IN OUR FINE CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT: THE CITY OF TIGARD EXTENDS A SINCERE "THANK YOU' TO SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATION FOR THEIR GENEROUS GIFT TO THE TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY WHICH WILL BE UTILIZED TO ENHANCE SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF TIGARD. ATTEST: / CITY RECORDER- CITY OF TIGA D MAYOR C TY OF TIGARD SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATION Architects, Engineers & General Contractors October 6, 1989 f f t Tigard Public Library 13125 SW Hall Blvd. g Tigard, OR 97223 f ATTN: Ms. Irene Ertell i In honor of the Fifth Anniversary of SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATION, we are pleased to donate an Epson 1-E computer and f Epson LQ-510 printer to the Tigard Public Library. s i SHIMIZU AMERICA CORPORATIONIs Northwest Regional office is located in Tigard. We have been the construction project manager on several high-tech manufacturing facilities near Tigard and throughout Washington County. Among these are Japan Aviation Electronics; Fujitsu America, Phases I & II; Epson Portland, Phases I & II; Toshiba Ceramics; and Technology Electronics America. This contribution to the Tigard Public Library is our way of saying "Thank You" to the City of Tigard for its generous support and guidance during our first five years. sincerely, Taka Konishi Vice President Regional Office Corporate Office 7100 S.W. Hampton, Suite 231 241 S. Figueroa St., Suite 340 Tigard, OR 97223 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Phone: (503) 620-2965 Phone: (213) 617-7477 FAX: (503) 620-0223 FAX: (213) 617-0159 i ; :.~^;s~, .5,~1,1t;i'hr'~--tY'Md .i ,3,*(1 w ~,•N -`~q C~Rj(• .r: ' i `A. °Yg~ 4 "eE pr.~q-y~+yA.. z a Y. ~c~oiF~-• Y . i p tyryt. RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN PROCLAMATION °t WHEREAS, Alcohol and other drug abuse in this nation has reached epidemic stages, and the 15-24 year old age group is dying at a faster rate than any other age group; and WHEREAS, it is imperative that visible, unified prevention education ' efforts by community members be launched to reduce the ( "f demand for drugs; and a WHEREAS, the National Federation of Parents for Drug Free Youth with the Oregon Federation of Parents for Drug Free Youth (and t.....~ : local affiliates) are sponsoring the National Red Ribbon ay~~ Campaign offering citizens the opportunity to demonstrate " their commitment to drug free lifestyles; and " WHEREAS, the National Red Ribbon Campaign will be celebrated in every Community in America during "Red Ribbon Week," during the week of October 22-29, 1989; and WHEREAS, President George Bush and Mrs. Barbara Bush are the National Honorary Chairpersons and Attorney General Dave f Frohnmayer is the State Honorary Chairman to provide this D! community focus on a Drug Free America; and, WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious i institutions, service organizations, youth, physicians, .~-.s senior citizens, military, sports teams, and individuals cw► will demonstrate their commitment to drug-free, healthy lifestyles by wearing and displaying red ribbons during , this week-long campaign; and, WHEREAS, the community of Tigard further commits its resources to ensure the success of the Red Ribbon Campaign; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of r Tigard does hereby support October 22-29, 1989, as Red Ribbon Week, and encourages its patrons to participate in drug prevention education activities, making a visible statement that we are strongly committed to a drug free community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Tigard encourages all its citizens to pledge: MY CHOICE DPIJG FREE. I Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor f City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder j I l y ! x W / v o ! f 1 1 i j "Wit" , Oct. 16, 1989 To the Tigard City Council r As citizens of a community where we believe our vote as well as our voice is heard and listened to, we feel we must moke a statement regarding a decision by our City of Tigard Community Development Director. The decision we refer to is a traffic pattern on the Hudson property located at S.W. Watkins and Pacific Highway. We were extremely disillusioned by the decision of the development director to do away with the RIGHT TURN ONLY out of the Watkins egress. Even the developer, who after attending several NPO and neighborhood meetings, agreed with our safety and traffic concerns, decided to submit his plan to the city with a 'RIGHT TURN ONLY' on to Watkins, thereby forcing traffic onto Pacific Highway instead of back into our neighborhood. The message that is being; sent to the residents of this neighborhood by the employees of the City of Tigard is that safety is not a viable concern. There are at least 65 children who use t Watkins Avenue(from Park Street south towards Pacific Highway)to and from Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. Children and adults walk and ride their bikes daily on this street. At the Dresent time there are no sidewalks and there are open drainage ditches. With the estimated increase in traffic from this development, we feel the traffic and safety issue has not been dealt with properly. At a recent (September 29th) neighborhood meeting, it was decided unanimously to drop the appeal against the City of Tigard, only because we had more to gain from the developer in doing so. si However, we feel strongly enough to come before the City Council and once again express our views and concerns. We are asking the City 66uncil to please direct the planning department to reconsider their decision regarding the Watkins Avenue exit on the Hdd•son property. Thank you for your time. espectfully submitted, - ew r /cz v v W Oct- 16. 1989 4 M g P Golacy'L 2n Cyty Y~ T~ o GxT TUB ; TO t n d Off' dro Ku Lem' c45ti ell , ~ c Lit=er Vi i t&:~ -G1 ,n.cl a/a3/b~ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Keith Liden October 26, 1989 FROM: Cathy Wheatlw~ SUBJECT: Appeal of Director's Interpretation Manufactured Home - Cook Lane Keith, Herm Porter of NPO #3, asked for and was granted, a waiver of the appeal fee for the above-referenced issue. This was done through Council action on Monday, October 23, 1989 at their regularly scheduled Council meeting. cw MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Keith Liden, Senior Planner October 19, 1989 FROM: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder`-- SUBJECT: Appeal of Director's Interpretation Keith, attached is the appeal received on the Director's Interpretation concerning the placement of a manufactured home on S.W. Cook Lane. Supporting material is also attached. The NPO must request a fee waiver from City Council. It is my understanding that they will be doing this before City Council on October 23, during the Visitor's Agenda. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me. cw Attachments c: Ed Murphy, Community Development Director C.. LAND USE DECISION APPEAL FILING FORM The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to participate in local government. Tigardd's Land Use Code therefore sets' out specific requirements for _ filing appeals on certain land use decisions. CITY 4%20 T1 AIMWIM The following form has been developed to assist you in OREGON filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer any questions you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at 639-4171. 1 1. APPLICATION BEING APPEALED: 7(j?j (e r0)?' S ZN'fc/1~7A7/ON COAX-9640110 Ti-(6- MA1UU FACzu,eM 1-OmL one sw COOK LANE- 1 e. 'M da.+,Qf I ~~rra~s~r 2 . . HOW DO YOU QUALIFY AS A PARTY- 1) GNTM r-b TO 12071 C E ie~, Q Z> A 666-)e1 cc-UeA 6Y 7ff~_ D E-01 ll~ 3. SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL OR REVIEW: PUASL ScE 67TAC GE7 ~ tjQnm ]D6A) 1S /y100A))M JA--t" --,I N c~ y , 1,q a?9. 4. SCHEDULED DATE DECISION IS TO BE FINAL: t01g, ~ 5. DATE NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION WAS GIVEN: to (t : ~i~/C L l QI~F3 6. SIGNATURE (S) iHt-x~E-~HHt•~E1t-~E-1FK x-x-~E-)E~E~E~(~E~E#~(-3HHt •~E~E•~(-x~t-)HF1E~t-x FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Received By: 0- paVe-Date: /O 191Time: 4/ •rtApproved As To Form By: -W Date:/D /8 S2 Time: .,OIYL Denied As To Form By: Date: Time: r - Receipt No. Amount: ~t IHHE ~E ~HE3HE fEi( lHHHwE~yEIC ~E x x ~HHHE ~EiO MMO YEiE IM WD rnu t5l- rQ 91,c o.5 ~ec ova rvet _~~Y 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 i i i i RECEIVED tJUL 07 198J f' Mr. Ed Murphy Community Development Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 July 5. 1989 Dear Mr. Murphy I am writing this letter to you as a protest to several recent actions and decisions made by the Tigard Building and Planning Departments. As I am sure you know, a mobile home was recently placed on a lot on Cook Lane. This is property immediately adjacent to my home at 10634 S.W. Cook Lane. To say the least, I was taken by surprise the day the mobile arrived on the property. I was completely unaware that the Tigard Community Development plan had been amended to allow mobile homes in traditional low and medium density zonings. However, the most distressing aspect of my complaint is the seeming lack of enforcement of the city's building code or; possibly more correctly, the disparity between the code that this particular mobile home is being allowed to conform to and the city's code for traditional houses. There are two basic issues I will address in this letter: 1. Mobile Home/Manufactured Home building code requirements,and 2. Mobile Home/Manufactured Home zoning requirements. I am writing to you on this matter rather than the Planning Director because it is the building code requirements, or lack thereof, which illustrate so clearly -the zoning incompatability of mobile homes interspersed with traditional stick built homes. I think it is incumbent upon your staff to recognize this situation and bring it to the proper attention. Building-Code Requirements Subsequent to the placement of the mobile home on Cook Lane, I have had several telephone conversations with inspectors at the Building Department. I made each of these calls to question compliance with code requirements. Each call resulted in your compliance officers explaining to me the difference between the mobile home/ manufactured Home code and the uniform building code for stick houses. The compliance officer also promised that an inspection would be made to check for compliance with the applicable code. Based on the fact that nothing has resulted in altering the "construction" of the mobile home, I must assume that:(1) either the mobile meets manufactured home building requirements and these requirements are substantially below the requirements for stick homes, or (2) the City Building Department is allowing substantial non-compliance with the applicable code. I believe these specific violations are existing at the mobile home placement on Cook Lane. 1. Foundation -The alledged foundation under the mobile home is a series of five 6 inch concrete strips running east-west, attached at the east end by another strip of 6 inch concrete. These strips have no footing; i.e. there is no subsurface concrete. Neither do these strips form a perimeter enclosure. -On top of the 6 inch concrete strips are unsecured concrete blocks stacked 3 high. The mobile home is placed on these. In no way, that I am aware of, is the structure secured to the ground. 2. Skirting -To skirt the approximately 24 inch space between the mobile home and the cement strip, the owner has attached plywood. Dirt is pushed directly up to, and is in direct contact with, this skirting. 3. Occupation Permit -Has an occupation permit been granted? The owners are occupying the mobile home. However, the structure does not have permanent porches, front or back, no permanent walkways are installed, the driv3way is not complete, etc. Work to complete the installation on this site has slowed to a snail's pace since occupation took place. . 4. Garage -The garage is a stand alone structure. In no way is it attached to the mobile home, nor can it be accept in a totally artificial manner. In addition to these above violations, I also believe that two other problems may be discovered: 1. The side setbacks measured from the east eve of the house to the west eve of the garage does not visually seem to comply with the code. I have not actually attempted to measure this. i 2. The owner obviously has two front yard driveways planned. The presumed use of the second driveway is the large recreational vehicle now parked in the adjacent lot. Zoning Requirements As recently as February 1989 changes have occurred in the Community Development code making the placement of mobile homes more permissive in Tigard. The February change simply deleted the word manufactured from the previously used "manufactured/mobile home" phrase previously used in the code (18.94.020). This change, I am told, legitimized the mobile home placement on Cook Lane. I do not believe this was the change that was intended. I believe the City Council, under the advice of the building department staff, assumed there was a difference between a manufactured home and a mobile home. i The structure on Cook Lane is a mobile home? Drive by and look at it, you will know it when you see it. Imagine it next to your home. It appears that under our current definitions the only difference between a mobile home and a l manufactured home is that the mobile has wheels and a tongue attached. Was the intent of the code change to allow mobile homes.in residential neighborhoods? As stated earier, this structure is not attatched to the ground. It can be moved at any time simply by reattatching the wheels and the tongue. One of the goals of our zoning regulations and building codes is to provide assurance to residents and-businesses that development will be consistent, 4 compatable, and meet certain standards. The result of this change in the code has hardly accomplished that. Again, drive by and look; this structure sticks i. out like a sore thumb. There are two vacant lots adjacent to this structure. Will mobile homes be placed on these? I am afraid of that eventuality and the i. resultant further degradation of the neighborhood and our property values. - i In conclusion, I request that you review the zoning code's allowance of mobile home structures like this one in the same neighborhood with traditionally constructed homes. Mixing manufactured structures in with traditional structures, when they do not comply with the same standards is effectively interspersing, lot by lot, two disparate zoning and building codes. All homes within the same defined zoning area, whether manufactured or stick built, must be held to the same standard. What sense does it make to have two different building standards? Where two standards exist, the lowest common denominator will always prevail because no one wants to build a stick home, held to a - higher standard, next to a mobile home, which is held to a lower standard. This is not an acceptable outcome of the Community Development Code. i Sincere i Dennis Moonier 10634 S.W. Cook Lane Tigard, Oregon 97223 cc: Mr. Keith Lyden Planning Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 i Tigard, Oregon 97223 F, Mr. Herman Porter Chairman. NPO #3 City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard. Oregon 97223 r MEMORANDUM 1 October 11, 1989 RE: October 17 Planning commission hearing on the Director's Interpretation concerning the manufactured home at 10676 SW Cook Lane This agenda item will not be heard at the October 17 Planning Commission meeting. MEMORANDUM 2 October 11, 1989 RE: Director's Interpretation: Manufactured Home at 10676 SW Cook Lane The City of Tigard Community Development Department is issuing an amended decision concerning the manufactured home mentioned above. You will find a copy of the amended decision accompanying this document. The purpose of-reissuing the decision is to provide information regarding the appeal process that was not included in the original document. In particular, please note the final date that an appeal may be filed. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Mr. Dennis Moonier evenings or weekends at 620-6680 or the City of Tigard Planning Division at 639-4171. r CITY OIr TIGA RD OREGON October 10, 1989 Mr_ Dennis Moonier 10634 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Directors Interpretation Manufactured home at 10676 SW Cook Ln. Dear Mr_ Moonier: After reviewing the issues surrounding the placement of a manufactured home at the above' referenced address, I have decided to allow the structure to remain as it is_ in my opinion, the Community Development code as it is now written allows fo= the placement of a manufactured home on a single family lot, and this building as placed meets the intent of the code. The justification for this decision is as follows: 1_ The municipal code allows placement of a manufactured home on a single family lot. C. The building is a manufactured home- By the City Development Code, a "manufactured home- is similar to a "mobile home", except that it meets both the National Urban and Housing Development standards, and the Uniform Building Code_ 2. The municipal. code defines a "manufactured home" as a factory fabricated transportable building designed to meet the Uniform Building Code_ In my'opinion the home complies with the intent of the municipal code- There are some differences in the construction of the building from the Uniform Building Code (such as the insulation and plumbing), but those differences are not outwardly visible, and are suitable for this type of structure. Changing those items to meet the Uniform Building Code would not change the appearance of the building, or provide any real benefit to either the owner or the neighbors. The structural frame of the building 'is the same as a site built home (2x6 wood stud walls, manufactured roof trusses, 2x6 wood floor joists)- 3. The municipal code requires a manufactured home conform with all zoning regulations applicable 'to a site. built home, including minimum lot size, building set-backs, building height, utility availability, off- street parking, and other applicable standards. The home complies with these regulations. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, _ (503) 639-4171 1 _ .Z. +J S t C 4. The municipal code requires that the home is larger than 950 square feet. The home complies, it is 1,280 square feet.. t: 5. The municipal' code requires that the home is placed on a permanent, I; elevated foundation and anchored in accordance with the regulations adopted by the Oregon Department of Commerce and the manufacturer's installation specifications. The home complies. Please.note that the regulations. do not require any anchorage of the building to the foundation. t- 6_• The municipal code requires that the exterior walls and roof of the home be covered with materials customarily used on site built homes. - I The home complies. The building is'covered with hardboard panel siding, which is-.typical material used in site built homes. The roof covering is fiberglass composition, a typical roof covering used in site built fconstruction. t My staff, the City Attorney, and myself have researched this issue thoroughly,1 including calling the manufacturer of the house. in question, and have come to the conclusion that the structure meets the definition of a manufactured home in the Community Development Code. This decision is being issued pursuant to Tigard Municipal Code 18.12_010 as a Director's Interpretation.. t: Any party may appeal this interpretation in accordance with Sections 18.32..290(A), 18.32_310(A) and 18.32_348 of the Community Development Code. r Pl The -appeal 'must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($55.00) and include the tt following information: 1) a description of the interpretation being appealed, s 2) the appellant's qualifications as a party, 3) the specific grounds for. appeal, 4) the scheduled date the interpretation is to be final (see below), 5) the date the interpretation was given, and 6) the signature(s) of those appealing the interpretation. This interpretation will be final on October 24, 1989 unless an appeal is filed- The deadline for filing an appeal is October 24, 1989 Sincerely, i; er:hV Community Development Director • t • ~~c.. G~ :r•+ '.y x':.-5i Y+' L j;;~: 'y... `r.: :•t: .'.'C~"S ..r'w~n `r~i~. .is.a.. .~•i..t':n''~•p+iN •-~i^i....r,.... -°'`'Ft rJSL-•- =~7<.~rh~: - - •'J~7,. ..?.0. s.~:c~.....d. ...,..~i. -P.. . .c.wY:%+•.,.Q~...r:1i8it..vL~..T..c%.~t1:<.iY'A..r,.. ~ . . _ ...:.rt,: • 'C. r - . Jill MIN= OF REGULAR MEETING OF NPO # 3 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 TOWN HALL CONFERENCE ROOM - TIGARD CIVIC CENTER ' 1. Called to order at 7:06 PM by chairman Porter { 2. Roll Call` Present: Porter, Bledsoe, Froude, and Hansen. r Absent: Kl. ngele (excused), Mortensen, Hooker, and Smith (see item 8 { regardiag'Smith•s membership). Staff: Senior Planner Liden Guest: Per attached sign-up sheet d 3. The new Police Chief, Ron Goodpaster, introduced himself to the people in [ NPO # 1 and NPO # 3. He offered statistical help in considering any problem areas. He also asked :us to call him if we need help in the neighborhood. 4. Minutes from August 2, 1989, were approved. d t 5. SDR 89-20/V 89-26 WTM Development Co., 13702 and 13735 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD tax lots 400 and 500), the old Hudson Station. t Discussion of this development continued from last meeting. John Moore with WTM Development Co. had met with a selected group of residents, and in response had offered to the city a modified plan of development. Modifications included curving the exit on Watkins Street so that traffic would be forced to turn right toward Pacific Highway; also the internal traffic pattern made the approach to Watkins not a thoroughfare as was previously. The water detention system was modified so that there would be no standing water except in a flood situation caused by an intense and/or' prolonged downpour. A resident Dave Hammes diagrammed the detention facility. Again John Moore represented WTM Development Co. There was considerable discussion, with residents objecting primarily to the traffic access to Watkins Street. Dave Hammes suggested signing the exist for "right turn only", and marking entrance as "entrance only", so that police could enforce these policies. The NPO made that a motion by majority (3-0).. Bev Froude made a motion that the NPO recommend the City investigate continued usage of 2 or 3 accesses to Pacific Highway, and the NPO approved her motion my majority (2-0). John Moore asked the NPO attitude toward the proposed variance. By unanimous motion the NPO approves the variance, provided that screening is t provided as 'proposed. / Bob Bledsoe commented that the residents were being unreasonable in their i opposition to the development in failing to.recognize and appreciate the compromises being made by WTM Development Co. He made a motion that the } NPO recommend approval as submitted; the motion failed (1-2). Herm Porter 11 F~ w ( ' i • c made a motion to recommend approval with the exception of access to Watkins. Dennis Moonier commented that not having access to Watkins, but instead multiple accesses on Pacific Highway near Watkins, might make traffic in and out of Watkins difficult. Herm Porter withdrew his motion. One resident suggested retaining an attorney for the NPO. The chairman explained that such would not be appropriate for the NPO, but the residents have that option. 6. Manufactured Home on Cook Lane Dennis Honnier stated he had-received a letter August 29 which addressed half of his questions. The building seems to meet the UGB Code except insulation and plumbing. But when it comes to the foundation, it seems the City staff no longer referenced the UGS but Department of Commerce standards. There was much discussion of State and City laws and standards for mobile or manufactured homes. The motion was made for NPO # 3 to appeal the permits for this manufactured home. The motion passed unanimously (4-0). Further, the acting secretary, Bob Bledsoe, said he would poll those members not in attendance. (The result of the poll is'that Rlingele and Hook will support and vote for the appeal, but Mortensen needed more information, particularly what is underneath the structure.) The motion was also passed unanimously (4-0) to ask City Council to take up the approval of these permits for its own review, on its own initiative. NPO # 3 unanimously recommends that the provision allowing placement of manufactured homes in any residential area be repealed. There should be some restrictions such as conditional use, or specially designated area as suggested by the recent State law. 7. H 89-17 - NPO # 3 offers no comment on this proposal. F 8. Other Business i in discussion with all present, it was noted that several residents have applied for membership in the NPO, but no recent appointments have been made by Council (except Bev Froude). The NPO unanimously request Council to make several appointments. Also Mike Smith has had very little ! attendance recently. The NPO agreed unanimously to have the Chairman contact Mike Smith, and ask for either his resignation, or his active participation. 9. Adjournment at about 9:30 PM Respectfully Submitted Bob Bledsoe, Acting Secretary NPO # 3 dj/MIN-NP03 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L METI G WNUffi - AUGUST 28, 1989 - 6:30 PM 1. 10EL CAM: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors Carolyn Eadon (arrived at 6:46 p.m.), Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten and John Schwartz. Staff Present: Patrick Really, City Administrator; Jerzy Offer, Associate Planner (arrived at 7:10 p.m.); Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder, Randy Wooley, City Engineer (arrived at 6:50 p.m.) 2. STUDY SESSION: a. Prison Sitincr: Brenda MacLeod from the Coalition for Responsible Prison siting from the North Plains area noted her concerns with the process of the siting ccemnittee in determining the areas which would be considered for a prison. She noted this represented a dangerous precedent by usurping land use laws and was concerned that local needs would not be taken into consideration. She advised that other sites, which meet all of the criteria, were welcoming the possibility of a prison. After Council discussion, consensus was that the need for an additional prison in Oregon was very clear. Council would not object to a Washington County location; however, the two sites identified in Washington county were not desirable. Council agreed that other sites in the state would be better suited which would meet the criteria. b. Metropolitan Area Communications Communication (MACC) Representatives: Bruce Crest, A ministrator, and Paula Manley, Manager of Tualatin Valley Community Access (TVCA) reviewed with Council their current work activities. Mr. Crest outlined MACC's various functions, including cable franchise regulations, construction monitoring, consumer protection, and their management of the public communications network. Ms. Manley advised TVCA was a little over a year old. The South Center studio, located in Tigard, was the newest addition. TVCA offers training for cxmummity organizations and school children in producing their own video broadcasts at no charge. Ms. Manley presented a short video which was put together by a 4th grade class. (Councilor Eadon arrived at 6:46 p.m.) Mr. Crest noted MACC served 50,000 subscribers (up 10,000 from last year). This represents a population of 300,000. He noted their newest cable operator, Columbia Cable of Oregon, appeared to be working quite well. He advised that a consumer coordinator had been hired to deal with consumer inquiries. COUNCIL MDXTES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 1 r Council was apprised that Tigard Council meetings were now shown in all of Tigard on Goverment Access Qnannel 21. C. Noise Ordinance: Councilor Johnson noted the Noise Ordinance, as proposed, may be too restrictive. Staff advised DEQ has reviewed the ordinance and did not register any areas of concern with regard to enforceability. Discussion followed on outside factors which may add to a noise issue such as highway traffic acccupanying a noise producing activity by a business. Council consensus was that they would review this carefully to assure this did not represent an overreaction to an isolated incidence. d. Hudson Station Property - Staff advised that neighbors have indicated concern about the development of the Hudson Station property (NPO #3 area). Council discussed this issue briefly noting that the final decision on development would be a Director's Decision as provided by-the Tigard Municipal Code (SIC). The TMC allows the Director to approve, modify, or forward the decision to the Planning Commission. 3. VISI'iMIS AGENDA a. Martha Bishop, 10590 S.W. Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, read her testimony into the record; she distributed the text of her comments to Council. The subject of her testimony was the Hudson Station property and adjacent land. A copy of her presentation has been filed with the Council packet material. Ms. Bishop noted concerns with underground gasoline tanks and possible contamination from these tanks which have been in place for years. She referred to the developer's plan which called for a retention pond and outlined her apprehensions with this proposal. b. Virginia A. Brown, 13365 S.W. Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, also testified on the development of the Hudson property. She noted concerns about traffic. She suggested that Watkins Street be made a one-way street to alleviate potential problems. Another item of concern was protection from water runoff from the property once it was developed. C. Dave Hammes, 10740 S.W. Fairhaven Way, Tigard, Oregon, noted concerns with the traffic pattern for this property. He said traffic should be controlled on Watkins Street to avoid traffic- flow difficulties. d. Dennis Moonier, 10634 S.W. Cook Lane, Tigard, Oregon, advised he was also concerned about the development of the Hudson property. He noted frustration over the difficulty in obtaining information from the city on the development. He said he felt that the plans for this proposal had been submitted but there was a time delay COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 2 before the plans were made available for the public to review. City Attorney noted that once the applicant submits his application, the material becomes a public document. Discussion followed on the process wherein it was noted that NPo comments would be received before the Director's Decision was prepared; the public comment period would be held open until after September 6, 1989, to provide an opportunity for the NFO to review at their meeting. 4. GCNSII+TP AIWA: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes: July 17 and 24, 1989 4.2 Approve Resolution Supporting Expeditious Land Use Analysis, Prelim; ory Engineering and Riot-of-Way Acquisition for the Western Bypass Corridor - Resolution No. 89--65 4.3 Approve Resolution Supporting City of Gaston's Membership in the Metropolitan Area communications commission (m cr-) Res. #89-66 4.4 Approve Resolution Welcoming the Head Start center to Tigard- Resolution No. 89-67 4.5 Approve Resolution Appropriating Donations to the City of Tigard- Resolution No. 89-68 4.6 Approve of Greerburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project for Inclusion in the 1989-90 Streets Capital Improvement Budget 4.7 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Meeting: Authorize the City Administrator to Approve all Necessary Documents to Acquire Patchin Property for S.W. McDonald Street Bond Project; Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4.8 Authorize Mayor's Signature on Agreement to implement yard Debris Recycling with Washington County - Resolution No. 89-69 a. Spike Friedman, 10575 S.W. Cascade, Tigard, Oregon, expressed support for Item .6, (Greenburg Road/Cascade Boulevard Traffic Signal Project) . City Council Meeting was Recessed b. Council convened as the Local Contract Review Board. Motion by Board member Kasten, seconded by Board member Johnson, to approve consent Agenda item .7. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. City Council Meeting Reconvened c. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to approve the Consent Agenda as proposed (less item .7 which was considered separately). The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 3 d. Councilor Kasten noted that Item .5 represented a donation of $350 F to the K-9 unit of the Police Departsent. He cm m►ented that there were citizens within the City who were so appreciative of some of the services offered that they make voluntary contributions. In this instance a citizen has requested that this money be used as discretionary funds within that division. He said both the City and Council was most appreciative of these contributions. 4. RED ON MUN ~SH IN CMY LamETS a. City Administrator advised that, in research conducted by staff on a whistle-free zone, it was learned that the public Utilities Commission has the ultimate responsibility and authority for designating whistle-free zones in the city limits. This review can be triggered in two different ways: First, there can be a citizen petition (with as few as 12 names) asking for the PUC to trigger the review. The second method would be initiated by a request of the City government. The request can be a neutral request or a positive request in the sense that the City favors the establishment of a whistle-free zone. The PUC will review the request and make a determination whether restricting whistling would create safety problems. In its review, the PUC may decide to issue the restriction-on whistling for selected times or selected crossings. It was exclusively within their purview to make this decision. City Administrator advised that, if it was the Council's wish to have the whistle-free zone examined for applicability in Tigard, it was his recommendation that the Council ask him to draft a letter asking the PUC to give consideration to establishment of whistle- free zone in the City of Tigard. b. Toby Padgett, 8775 S.W. Commercial Street, Apt. No. 5, Tigard, Oregon, advised that when she last spoke to the Council she asked they petition the Oregon PUC to prohibit train whistles from sounding within the City limits. She said she wished to amend that request and ask that train whistles be prohibited from sounding in Tigard between the hours of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., seven days a week, unless the engineer determines an emergency situation exists at the upcoming crossing. Ms. Padgett cited several cities which now have whistle-free ` ordinances and advised they work well. She noted she had a copy of k. a letter sent to Mayor Edwards from DEQ which stated they supported s and would assist Tigard in petitioning the PUC to prohibit the noise pollution caused by train whistles at night. s C. Mayor acknowledged receipt of the DEQ letter as referred to by Ms. Padgett in her testimony. He said the city Administrator was authorized to initiate a letter to the PUC exploring whistle-free zones for Tigard. i t COUNCIL bIINNUIES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 4 d. Councilor Johnson noted that safety would be the overriding concern in any request for whistle-free zones. 5. P TICN BY PARK MUM - DPLIME CK PAPK ILVY E. 4i a. Mr. Steve Slabaugh, 0mu-man of the Park Board, noted the status of the efforts with regard to the levy which would appear on the mail- in ballot for park funding. He advised a Political Action CoMmittee had been formed by the name of Citizens for Tigard. He noted funds were raised to help in the efforts to pass the levy. ' The PAC has (or will be): t o put up yard signs throughout the City o mailed letters to registered voters within the City o held interviews with the press o distributed fliers throughout the community which outlined the amount of funds necessary to make the park improvements o mailed letters to editors of local papers He said they were optimistic the levy would be successful. b. Councilor Eadon thanked Mr. slabaugh and the volunteers who worked hard on this process. She referred to the investment in the future and the important role that parks development play for Tigard. she said, as Tigard continued to grow, parks would became even more important. Establishment of parks that provide a variety of services was critical. The ballot issue represented at least two years of very hard work and planning. 6. DURBAN IUM SAFETY a. City Engineer reviewed the presentation presented by students from Twality Junior High School Students about safety concerns on Durham Road. He said he wanted to update Council on this issue: - Speed Limit Concerns. The City cannot change the speed limit without approval of the State Speed Control Board. Staff has requested the State Speed Control Board to review the speed limit and has suggested recent development may warrant a reduced speed limit. The State acknowledged this request in June. It typically takes about three months for the State to Clete their-review and issue a report. - Dips in the Road. Site distance was made even more difficult at some intersections because of the dips in the road. The brush removal program along the roadside has been more frequent and closer to the ground than other areas of the city. - Traffic Signals. Recently, Council approved an agreement with C the State Highway Department for installation of a signal at COUNCIL NBN UES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 5 Hall & Durham funded under the Transportation Safety Improvement Bond Project. Design is underway by the State Highway Division and would go to bid late this year and be constructed in early 1990. School Bus Boarding. Since viewing the video presentation last June, staff has learned that the school bus schedules and routes were such that those students cud not need and were not supposed to cross the road. There will be efforts to correct this. Also, school starting times have been changed at Twality Junior High this next school year; school will be starting about one half hoar later this year. This means students will, for the most part, not need to be crossing Durham Road or walking along Durham Road during the peak morning comwte traffic hours. Truck Restrictions. This was reviewed and implemented before the concerns were discussed last June. City Engineer reviewed that truck restrictions were extended when Durham Road first became a City street. Review of Problems. City Engineer noted in early August he brought a group of people together who were familiar with the problems on Durham Road. He said the group consisted of representatives from the School District, City staff (including the Police Department), NPO representative, and the citizen (Donna Worsley) who helped the students put together their presentation. City Engineer advised this was an informal, but very productive, discussion with identification of several programs which would be implemented at the beginning of the school year. The School District was reviewing with the school bus company some revisions to the school bus routes to avoid having pick- up and drop-off locations on Durham Road. It now looks as if the School District will be able to eliminate junior high and elementary students "from being picked up by the school bus on Durham Road. There probably will still be some stops for high school students on Durham Road. Through the School Resource Officer of the Police Department, an educational program has been scheduled. This includes safety training for pedestrians and bicyclists. City Engineer noted the group talked of the need for education of parents as well. Parents should be made aware of the school bus regulations and where students should cross and be knowledgeable of safety routes and programs established by the school District. Adults should also follow safety rules in crossing roads and riding bicycles. A parent educational program was noted by the discussion group as well. COUNCIL MMUI'ES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 6 In the cases where bus stops were not able to be eliminated along Durham Road, the group talked of ways which could be quickly and inexpensively created for students to wait off of the pavement so they would not be in the traffic lams. once the new school bus routes are established, specific solutions will be identified.. City Engineer noted he thought there were probably a couple of locations where the City could rather quickly respond before the rainy season and provide a better surface where the students could stand clear of the side- street pavement. This would also require coordination with the school bus drivers so they understand why students cannot reach the bus as quickly. The students bad suggested more police patrol. City Engineer noted the police had always given concentrated patrol in the school areas, especially in September when school first starts. The officers will be giving extra emphasis on this during the fall by concentrating on school zones during school crossing times with Durham Road as a high priority. The Police Chief has talked with a number of citizens in the Durham Road area and he has been apprised of the concerns which were brought up last June. The Chief has vowed to pursue these concerns and to assist in seeking solutions to safety problems. For longer-term solutions, the City Engineer referred to the transportation safety bond which provided funds for inprovement of Durham Road next summer. This project was on schedule. A small piece of the road will be worked on this fall by a developer who shall need to construct some site inprovements near 108th Avenue. The bond project would provide sidewalks and bicycle paths on both sides of the road as well as street lighting, site-distance improvements, and left turn lanes for vehicles at all intersections. This discussion group suggested the City explore bus turn outs for the school buses. For longer-range planning and in a regional scope, there has been talk of a westerly bypass and similar routes. These discussions were prcupted because of concerns on Durham Road and similar east-west routes in the Tigard and Tualatin areas. Those plans also address the provision of alternate routes for through traffic. A few ideas were discussed by the group and were decided not appropriate for implementation. These ideas included: Crosswalks. While this seemed like a logical safety improvement, after review of literature which suggested crosswalks have not shown the safety benefits which COUNCIL MDR7TES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 7 might be expected. In some cases, safety was actually decreased. It was decided that crosswalks should not be installed until after the improvements have taken place- With the undulating alignment of the road, crosswalks would not be easily visible by motorists and might create a false sense of security by pedestrians. Warning signs. Most of the people who drive Durham Road were those that drive the road every day because they live or ate through the area. [men people drive streets every day, signs are not noticed after awhile; therefore, this would not be an effective way to inform drivers. pedestrian tunnels. The group rejected this idea due to other safety concerns which go along with tunnels; i.e, potential for vandalism and, because this would not be a secured area, parents would not want their children to be walking through tunnels under the street. Bridges over the street. Similar concerns to the tunnels were noted plus the bridges would need to be rather high to clear the street and provide room for a bus or truck to go under. Experience has shown that bridges were not well utilized. People find them too hard to access and use. The group suggestion was not to put in the bridges now. After the safety bond improvements were completed, a review of the situation would be needed to determine if a bridge crossing would be appropriate. It was suggested that 98th Avenue would be the first intersection to be reviewed as logical site because this road comes from the school; designs were reviewed that may be attractive to pedestrians. City Engineer noted these ideas should have safety benefits for both the long-term and short-term solution to these problems. Mayor thanked City Engineer for his review. He noted he thought staff did an excellent job in addressing the concerns since the testimony received last June. I 7. paRXC HRUMU - ZONE CFWUE ANMMICU ZCA 89-06 DMUM.; IPO #3 For a zone change from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard R-7 zoning designation. ZONE: Presently R-6 County (Residential, 6 units per ace, Washington County). LOCATION: South end of 135th Avenue (WCIM 251, 4, Tax Lot 700) a. Public Hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. COUNCIL NIZNNLTI'ES - ALUUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 8 C. Summation by Planning Staff member Jerry offer. on July 17, 1989, the Council reviewed the annexation proposal for the Daniels property and approved annexation. On August 24, 1989, the Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission also approved that annexation; this parcel would be in the City when the Boundary Commission approval resolution was sided. When Council reviewed this proposal in July, the proposal was put forward to change the zoning from the County's R-6 designation to the City's R-7 zoning designation. The county's designation allowed six units per acre; the City's closest zoning designation to that was the R-7 which allows seven units per acre. At that time, members of the audience requested the City downzone the area to R-4, or four units per acre. The Cm=il asked staff to review this possibility and whether the City would encounter any problems with the requirements for meeting housing opportunities under the Oregon Adnii_nistrative Rules, Division 7, Metropolitan Housing Rule. Tigard staff discussed- this proposal with Washington County's Planning staff who advised they felt the zoning would basically be up to the City. However, the County indicted that if a downzoning were approved, the housing opportunity decrease would occur in the City's inventory, not'the County's. This was confirmed by Tigard Staff with the DLCD office. Staff has kept track of the housing opportunities through the various developable residential properties, and presently, Tigard has an opportunity for 13,112 units throughout the City (for an average 10.16/acre). State law requires Tigard to have the housing opportunity on developable lands as 10 units/acre. The city could approve a redesignation to a lower density plan and zone designation and subtract the 100 units from the inventory and still comply with the State law for total opportunity; however, the City would be that much closer to being right at the line of compliance. Staff recommends that this property not be rezoned to R-4.5, and that Council approve the earlier proposed R-7 designation. Staff feels the City should try to retain as much housing opportunity as possible. Further, because of the topographic constraints of the proposed property, the net effect of a rezoning would not accomplish anything. Staff does not believe the property would develop at a density of greater that 4.5 units per acre no matter what the zoning was. Staff recommends that the Council add the Planned Development Overlay Zone to the designation. The effects of this would be: - to make the Planning commission the hearing body on a subdivision application and - to provide flexibility in individual lot sizes and in setbacks to allow the staff, Planning Commission and the developer more COUNCIL NIINUI'ES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 9 creative ways to develop the property. i Ole Planned Development process could be utilized to require additional buffers along the northern bury of this site or to possibly require larger lots along that boundary and then allow the lots further away from the developed area to be smaller. In summary, staff recommended that the council change the zoning on this property from the County's R-6 zoning designation to the City's R-7 zoning designation, with the Planned Development Overlay. d. Public Testimony Proponents o Town Brian, 7630 S.W. Fir Street, Tigard, Oregon, testified that he represented, Taira Klaus Corporation which was the owner and applicant of the property. He noted, as had been outlined by staff, the Boundary Commission approved annexation of the property last week. One of the elements provided in evidence at the Boundary Commission, was a substantial change in the proposal from what was submitted to the City a month ago. The lots have been decreased from 152 to 120; it would all be natural gravity flaw instead of pump stations; the number of lots contiguous to the Fern Street properties have been reduced from 13 to 10; drainage lines have been moved out of the easement between those lots and the Fern Street properties to eliminate any disruption to the natural vegetation and the trees there. The developer does not object to a downzone. The proposed density would be about 3.2 units/acre. Mr. Brian referred to a letter from Mr. Dale Addington submitted to Council which outlines this position on the downzoning. t r Mr. Brian advised the developer supported the Planned. Development Overlay. He said there were a lot of natural and j'. sensitive areas on that property which needed to be preserved and the flexibility the PD overlay would provide would be important. In addition, he advised they would be meeting with the neighborhood to respond to their concerns. o Mayor read into the record the August 28, 1989, letter from Dale Addington, authorized representative of Taira-Klaus Corporation which stated the developer did not object to a downzoning of the property. This letter has been filed with the Council packet material. i COUNCIL MURUES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 10 Opponents o Rod Kvistad, 13535 S.W. Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon, testified he was a proponent for the City of Tigard over the long haul. He said he did not like to see a project go in without all the details thorcughly analyzed. The downzoning would be excellent. He referred to Councilor Eadon's earlier comments that as housing lots become smaller, more parks would be new. He advised of his concerns should this property be developed at full density. He encouraged the Council to look at the 4.5 units/acre designation for housing in the area. Even this would not be compatible with what now exists; most of the lots in the area were at least 3/4 of an acre in size. He noted concerns with roads, drainage, sewage, etc. He asked that the procedures be outlined to assure neighbors could provide meaningful input into the proj eat prior to it being presented to the City. Mayor advised of the process available through the Planned Developuent Overlay regulations. Mr. Kvistad urged the Council to not only look at this project, in terms of density, but to future projects which could occur in the area and what this might mean to the total picture of the City of Tigard being a pleasant place to live. The decision made this evening would represent a precedent for a great deal of property; therefore, he again noted the importanoe to dawnsize the zoning designation. Councilor Johnson expressed concerned over a statement by Mr. Kvistad that they did not know about this public hearing. o V.W. Kac ynski, 12985 S.W. 135th, Tigard, Oregon, testified that this property was on the north slope of Bull Mountain; it was not on the top or agricultural land it was forest land. If this property was on the top of Bull Mountain, he advised he would have no objections to the density goals as state. He said he professionally disagreed with the position stated to the Council by the City planner. He said the only analysis the planner was using was the analysis of housing goals and density. Mr. Kaczynski said there were equally required IBC goals of water-quality, wildlife, and natural resource protection as well as soil conservation. He noted when all of these were taken into consideration, a recommendation cannot be made for a density of 7 units per acre on this steep, highly erodible property. Mr. Kaczynksi noted concerns with winter conditions including icing which occurs several weeks every years. He advised that S.W. 135th Avenue was Washington County Road and represented a serious traffic safety problem. COUNCIL MDR= - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 11 Mr. Kaczynski advised the entire property has had every bit of soil scraped. He outlined the removal of trees, plant life (including some endangered plan species), and brush which was recently removed. He said he was prepared to sue the developer should the land slump onto his property which was inmediately adjacent. In response to a question by Mr. Kaczynski, it was noted by the City Engineer and Mayor that the property was not within the City limits at the time the clearing was done. Mr. Kaczynski expressed concern that if the property was zoned to seven units per acre, the developer could find creative ways to increase the density. He noted there were serious constraints on the property. He strongly urged Council to downzone the property. o Gary Steele, 12645 S.W. 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, noted neighborhood concerns. He advised he moved to the area because of the large lots, dead end streets, and it was less ; crowded than nearby areas. He noted he would not be opposed to higher density housing on the top of the mOUntain; but not f on the steep slopes. He asked C=i--il to consider changing the zoning fran R-4.5 instead of R-7; this would appease the neighbors in the area. Mr. Steele advised he called LcDC in Salem and talked to Mr. Greg Wolfe. Mr. Wolfe advised that even though this area was.; zoned R-7, LCDC will review the area as to the way the area has developed to determine whether the housing inventory requirements have been met. He noted he was pleased that the developer has decided to develop the land with fewer units.; He advised he has talked to the Water District and with full develoXanent of Bull Mountain's north slope, there would not be enough water available. Other problems he cited included drainage and traffic. He advised the Bull Mountain R. Transportation Study has not yet been completed and now, there i~ was an additional 122 homes being built with only one way out on 135th Avenue. t: Mr. Steele said a lot of issues needed to be reviewed in making the decision as far as zoning was concerned. If the zoning is set at R-4.5, development would be limited; however, if Council approves the R-7, the developer could change their Q mind and build to that density thereby creating additional problems. He noted adjacent area was zoned R-4.5 and would be more in keeping of the Current land use of adjacent properties 1 and the long-term, sensible land use of the north slope of COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 28, 1989 PAGE 12 f Bull Mountain. Mr. Steele referred to the earlier comments on parks. He said the only parks they have in their area was in a residential area which was not accessible because there was no parking. Mr. Steele advised that telephone service was also an issue. He said he talked to the telephone company. Presently, the residents were an a carrier system which was very poor and causing problems. As far he knew, this was the only service which would be available for the 122 homes. He reiterated he recommended to the City Count- l the area be downzoned. o John Lewis, 13990 S.W. Fern, Tigard, Oregon, testified that he thought the developer was planning to develop at only the 3.2 units per acre. However, he was concerned should this developer sell the property to someone else who was not as credible. Mr. Lewis noted concerns about the ravine on the west side of the development- with regard to drainage. He also was concerned with traffic issues. o Tillman Stone, 13720 S.W. Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon, testified he represented the Fern Street Neighborhood Association. Mr. Stone outlined the characteristics of his neighborhood noting the neighbors cared very much about their area. He said the zoning choices between R-7 and R-4.5 was a major concern. He noted the management of the whole project had been poor; the original engineers were no longer working on the property. Mr. Stone said he believed the overall project was a good one; if it was done correctly, it would probably enhance existing properties. However, there were serious safety concerns to considered and he would remain opposed to a development at R-7 zoning until further consideration was given. Mayor Edwards clarified, for the record, about the vegetation clearing ont he property. He said Washington County apparently was advised and knew of the developer's activity. Tigard has no authority over the property at this time. The Mayor noted that with a Planned Development overlay, concerns over this property can be voiced. Mayor assured those present he was fully aware of the neighborhood and was familiar with their concerns. He noted he, too, wished to preserve the ecology of the area as much as possible. COUNCIL MINITl.'FS - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 13 Y o Kathy Baxter, 12950 S.W. 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, noted concerns over the period which she called a "sneaky window." She noted frustration over the County advising neighbors that this was going into the City, yet when the City was contacted, they said the property was still in the County. She said within one day the environment was ruined. Ms. Baxter also noted concerns with removal of trees over six inches in diameter. Mayor reiterated the City has no legal jurisdiction over this property. Ms. Baxter suggested that since this probably could happen again, the City and county should determine a way-to govern in these instances. Mayor outlined the regulations in place by several jurisdictions. He noted he was also concerned when the clearing of the property was taking place. Once the property becomes part of the City, then items such as traffic, drainage, sewage, and buffering can be addressed. Mayor noted the city's concern that people living in Bull Mountain have not expressed their desire to be annexed to the City in order to assure planning as development occurs. Ms. Baxter asked about liability for problems because of the clearing of the property's vegetation. City Attorney said he believed the City would not have any liability for action which was taken without the City's approval nor was the property within the City's jurisdiction. Ms. Baxter concluded by urging the Council to zone the property R-4.5. Rebuttal 0 Tom Brian clarified the following issues: - There were changes within the last ten days with regard to representatives of the developer. He was personally contacted by the developer within this time period which has re--.alted in some of the changes in the plan as submitted. Hopefully, the team together now would be consistent in their approach to the development of the property- - Tree removal occurred prior to Mr. Brian's supervision of the project. He said it had been his understanding this was done for removal of brush and was done with the permission of Washington County. The only trees cut down over six inches were photographed in advance, submitted to the County. They were either diseased or dead. COUNCIL MnRITES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 14 The contractor has been directed to examine the area and to look at soil stabilization in areas necessary. Mr. Kaczynski requested that as soon as property becomes part of the City, to direct the developer, through the City Engineer, to do anything possible to stabilize the soil. Mayor advised he thought this request was reasonable and the City Engineer would look at damage (if any) and assess the area. e. Recamendation by the Community Development Staff. City Engineer noted the subdivision process would be a separate public hearing process which would proceed after the property was in the City. He advised staff has viewed a subdivision proposal and a revised proposal, neither of which have been reviewed thoroughly at this time. Receipt of review comments would occur during the Planning Com-rassion hearing. City Engineer noted the issue before council tonight was the zoning of the property. Basically there were three choices presented: 1. R-7 Zoning 2. R-7 Zoning with Planned Development overlay 3. R-4.5 Zoning A draft ordinance was prepared and submitted to council outlining the zoning for R-7 with the Planned Development overlay. If Council chose one of the other two options, City Engineer suggested the Hearing be kept opened by continuing it to September 11 to assure proper procedural steps. City Engineer advised staff's recommendation was for R-7 Zoning with the Planned Development Overlay. After reviewing this site and some of the preliminary planning work, staff was persuaded that, even with an R-7 zoning, actual development of the site would be restricted by topography and it could not develop more than R- 4.5. This would preserve the housing inventory which was required under State regulations. He noted staff reconmended adoption of the proposed ordinance. f. Council Questions and Comments: Councilor Eadon asked Legal Counsel to review the LC'DC housing requirement condition: At periodic review, how does the LMC evaluate compliance with housing density requirements? Legal Counsel responded that all jurisdictions in the metropolitan area were required to have within their plan, on paper, the opportunity to create a density of 10 units/acre with a split between single family and multi-family of 50/50. The requirement was one with which you could take a lot of different approaches. One approach would be to calculate the density down to the last unit and have only the minimcnn necessary. Another approach was to provide some ODUNCIL MDVrES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 15 margin of error. Me staff was suggesting the latter approach based upon previous experience. Legal counsel further explained, at periodic review, there was a review based upon both what had actually taken place in the way of development and the density available on paper. If there was a pattern of developing at a much lower density provided for in the } (reprehensive Plan, it raises the specter that the Cmprehensive Plan was not really an accurate predictor of development and, } r therefore, additional density would need to be assigned to other i. areas to meet the average. ' g. Public Hearing closed h. Council Discussion: Each Councilor noted they did not make a declaration at the outset of the hearing; however, - clarified they personally ]mew Mr. Torn Brian, the developer's representative. Mus would have no bearing on any decision they would make on the issue. Councilor Schwartz noted he understood the eoncenr by the residents in the area.- Realistically, he said he could not see the potential of R-7 density being constructed in this terrain. He noted he felt comfortable with the Planned Development Overlay on the subject property in that there would be adequate review and hearings on any develapanent on this parcel. He pointed out the importance of maintaining the required housing density; Tigard was presently barely within the guidelines. If the City varies too far from this, they could be in violation of the state requirements. In addition, by not }crowing what other decisions would be needed, for other pieces of property in the future, he advised he would ` want to see as much flexibility for the city as possible. He noted, therefore, he would support the R-7 with the Planned Development Overlay. Councilor Kasten said he was sympathetic to many of the concerns expressed by the citizens who live in the Fern street area. He noted the topography of the land would essentially prohibit high- density housing. As a Council, they were also faced with the requirements mandated by the State; therefore, he advised he would j support the recommendation for R-7 Zoning with a Planned Development Overlay. Councilor Johnson explained the requirement by the State to have a 10 unit per acre inventory as she felt this was critical for those who testified to understand this. She further explained that if one area is downgraded for zoning, then there was a possibility k that another area would have to be upgraded. Councilor Johnson said she believed the area was improperly zoned by the County from the outset. She also noted the difficulty the COUNCIL MnMTS - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 16 City was in, because if they correct the zoning to more accurately reflect has the property could be developed, then the City's density inventory would be affected - not the County's. She further rioted decisions made tonight must be made carefully because there was no guarantee of who would develop the property. R-4.5, she stated, would be the proper zoning and this was what she would support. She noted staff was watching to assure that the proper inventory was maintained; however, she believed R-4.5 was the correct zoning for the property. Councilor Eadon agreed with Councilor Jason's comTents with regard to the inappropriateness of the County's zoning. - She noted this could not be looked at as an isolated piece of property; the entire north slope of Bull Mountain was probably improperly zoned. When the slope develops, all of these issues must be revisited. She also noted the Planned Development Overlay would allow the citizens to be involved in the development and site reviews; it would also allow more discretion in the ultimate outcome of the property. The best inmedlate hope for Bull Mountain would be to attract developers into the area who would be sensitive to the uniqueness of the slope. Councilor Eadon noted her concern if the property was downzone:d, then it would not be realistic or responsible to be so close to the minimums required by the State for density averages. She advised she was going to support the zone change to R-7 with a Planned Development Overlay. She also noted the need for Council to have discussion in the near future as they must continue to deal with the density issue. Mayor Edwards noted his agreement with the Councilors' comments. He advised he was concerned about the position the city was in with regard to the density requirements. Based on the fact that the developer in this particular situation was already going to develop at less than R-4.5 and most of the land bordering this area was R- 4.5, he announced that he would be voting in favor of the R-4.5 zoning. Councilor Schwartz said he thought it was obvious, because of topographical constraints, that the property could not develop at R-7. He pointed out by making this R-7, this gives the City more flexibility for future decisions. i. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt Ordinance No. 89-22. ORDI WCE NO. 89-22 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE (WNGE WA 89-06 (DANIEL) AND DECf DUNG AN EFFF7C1'IVE DATE. IC COUNCIL NIINUrES - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 17 Mayor Edwards noted the name of the applicant, Daniel, should be changed to Taira Klaus Corporation. A roll call vote was taken with Mayor Edwards and Councilor Johnson voting "Nay." The ordinance received a majority vote; however, Council practice has been to hold a second reading at the next meeting for ordinances which do not receive a unanimous vote of council present. The second reading of the ordinance was scheduled for September 11, 1989. 8. -PZ2NDA ITEMS a. Mayor announced that the Council would be supporting the MSTIP/2 proposal of Washington County. This was being done based upon the partnership with the neighboring cities of Tualatin and Sherwood. He advised council felt it was very important that the regional transportation be ccaVleted in the area. Councilor Schwartz added that the MSTIP/2 would also take care of major projects within the Tigard area which were badly needed. b. Mayor noted Council consensus to join the other jurisdictions in Washington County to oppose the proposed area of North Plains as a future prison site. Council would not oppose a prisons in Washington County; however, from testimony received council was aware of areas within the State which have asked for the prison which also meet the criteria and would benefit economically. C. Councilor Johnson referred to an earlier cxmm►ent about a neighborhood park on the north side of 99W being tucked into a neighborhood which did not have parking and access. She noted funds would be provided for acess improvement and parking areas if the Park Levy was passed by the voters in September. Sunm erlake Park was a citywide park. 9. E X1T1VE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 9:53 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10. ADJOURNMENT: 10:40 p.m. b Catherine Wheatley, City Recd er ATTEST: Mayor, City of Tigard cw.ccm828 COUNCIL NRR= - AUGUST 28, 1989 - PAGE 18 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 23. 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorization PREVIOUS ACTION: to request bids for remodelin of the Senior Cents r. PREPARED BY: Greg Berry DEPT HEAD ITY ADMIN OK% REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Shall the City staff be authorized to advertise for bids for remodeling of the Senior Center. INFORMATION SUMMARY The project was previously advertised for bids on April 26, 1989. The one bid received exceeded the available funding. City Council elected to reject the bid and retain an architect to reduce the scope of the project to within available funding. The attached proposal of the architect to accomplish this is the result of working with an advisory committee composed of City staff and representatives from the Senior Center Board. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Authorize the City staff to advertise for bids. 2. Withhold approval to advertise. FISCAL IMPACT The project has a budget of $200,000 including construction and the Architect's fees. $113.787 is funded by the City while the remaining $86,213 is funded by a H.U.D. Block Grant. SUGGESTED ACTION That the LCRB, by motion, authorize the City staff to advertise for bids for the remodeling of the Senior Center. dj/SS-SC.GB RICHARD E. RAGLAND, AIA • ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS TIGARD SENIOR CENTER REMODEL MINUTES OF COMMITTEE MEETING NO.2 SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 Present: Ed Murphy - City of Tigard Greg Berry - City of Tigard Duane Roberts - City of Tigard Cliff Scott - City of Tigard Emma Prelliman - Senior Center Al Bates - Senior Center Dick Ragland - Ragland Architects Richard Olmstead - Ragland Architects 1. PROJECT TIMELINE Timeline was reviewed for drawing preparation, bidding, Council review and approval and construction period. Ragland mentioned timeline reflects a longer than normal period due to elevator ordering and delivery. After discussion it was decided to let a separate Bid Package for the elevator which will save at least a month in time of completion. Also changed was a one, instead of two, week review and approval by Council, addition of a week period for contractor to gather and submit paperwork prior to construction and a pre-bid meeting. New projected Schedule attached to these minutes. 2. BUDGET STATUS The Committee reviewed the budget and target reduction goal of $93,820.00. The following items and estimates of reduction were reviewed and approved by the Committee: cm NW Third Aim Pnrtlanrl OR Q77f1Q ;nv271-r.77S 9/ 14/89 Meeting Page 2 i ITEM SAVINGS A. Delete Phase E entirely :6,000.00 r. B. Delete the wood deck on the west 1 end by the pantry $21300.00 C. Delete or change the following portions i of Phases A & B: 1. Delete new proposed stairs at elevator, reduce entry and store room below. $20,000.00 2. Delete new roof over existing roof { (redesign HVAQ. :6,000.00 3. Eliminate new cabinets on first and R second floor. 540200.00 k 4. Eliminate lower level heat pump. $15,000.00 4 5. Redesign HVAC system (eliminate i split system by elevator and substitute a ! "package" unit, simplify duct runs, etc.). $73500.00 f c 6. Reduce finishes budget (no refinish of second floor, delete sink at west end of Social Hall, etc.). $15,000.00 7. Eliminate south awnings, retain existing electric operated curtains. $5,000.00 8. Delete fire sprinklers. $180500.00 Total Reduction $990500.00 9/ 14/89 Meeting Page 3 D. Add new floor at existing opening at ramp to windows. Install wall around new interior stair. (S6500.00) Total Reduction $93,000.00 Based on these reductions, and the prospect of a more favorable bidding climate during the fall Ragland thinks the proposed work will be within City budget of $180,000.00 for construction. 3. WATER TANK REMOVAL The City still needs to make contact with the National Guard to determine when, and if, water tanks and the interior ramp can be removed. Ragland said it would be best to wait until just before construction begins in late December or early January. It was mentioned that temporary heating for the Center will be required during Winter construction. 4. HUD REQUIREMENTS UPDATE Roberts said the requirement for compliance with employee hiring and training for both contractor and all subcontractors apply. Ragland said this may be a factor in lack of bids because of the size of the project and a busy construction season. Roberts said the City and HUD will work with contractors to fill in the necessary paperwork. This needs to be addressed in the Invitation to Bid. 5. CITY BIDDING REQUIREMENTS Berry gave Ragland examples of preferred City bidding documents and explained procedures. Ragland to incorporate this information for the Addenda. -MONO titer ttitl~ tlittlO t ApOtO -moo tiotY Coae`m~ Pte $ A -UP ~tn8s attl+ ~ ~n~ia~cs: ProPs~ Upd»vd EN dot old Pec► , ~np~n Ad ~Coun~ PLANS AQ4NE n EM fl two", t E ~q Ps T pelab pEI octet Ekw10` ~pwry 10 SENIOR C~NTE'R aEMO attn4 Pty AYis T 1601D D IMEI~INE r T NKS~I'tIN~ ~ $ec~ Con CYE oL gEP EM8E61 t. 6 1989 AND, Pa N Ea~Counc p~qu►rod umena a1CHAaD E a r~111~c1ot awe' ' ~~inl~lon COt~tilUCjjo* Cotes n Cit~aT if l{OLIDAY NQ ConsrN~q i i ti RICHARD E. RAGLAND, AIA ARCHITECTS= PLANNERS October 9, 1989 Mr. Ed Murphy, Director of Community Development City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 s SUBJECT: Tigard Semor Center Fire Sprinklers i Dear Ed, As ve discussed at the Committee Meeting on Thursday, October 5 at the Senior Center, I have the folloving comments regarding the elimination of the fire sprinkler system vbich vas originally proposed for the building remodel. As you know the project vas nearly $100, 000.00 over budget and it vas my direction to evaluate the proposed construction program against available monies and make recommendations to reduce both proposed program improvements and evaluate vbere costs could be reduced in other nays. In order to meet the budget reduction goal I have proposed changes in two basic areas: One) eliminate actual proposed construction projects, and tvo) redesign or modify proposed elements to achieve budget reductions. The proposal to eliminate the fire sprinkler system vas based, in part, on the fact that the building is not required to provide a system by code, also, vbile it would be desirable to have a fire sprinkler system, it could not be justified given the magnitude of the reductions required. The greater than normal cost of providing a fire sprinkler system is due to the need to bring in new vater service to the building from the parking lot area in order to serve the building, and the need to route nev sprinkler lines through existing construction. It vas noted in our observation of the building that there are currently no smoke detectors in any of the rooms or no visible extinguishers in the building. The kitchen is provided with a fire suppression system at the range hood, as required by code. It would be our FtiiC~~ll v a..t: L; ; 12 198) ~nmmurlty D~se~opmcni 510 NW Third Ave, Portland,OR 97209,5031223-6725 { Page 2 recommendation that for a relatively small cost approved smoke detectors could be provided throughout the building at each floor, and in addition readily accessible fire extinguisher cabinets could be installed as an offset to the installation of a sprinkler system: while this may be a less desirable system it would provide the early yarning needed to evacuate the people from the Center. The primary advantage of the sprinkler system is the salvage of the contents. If you would like any further background or information on the above, please don't hesitate to call. Very Uwly; ,vm ( Richard E. Raga , AIA WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON I October 11, 1989 Pat Reilly, City Administrator IT, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 E E~ Bel 16 Tigard, OR 97223 : Attention: Duane Roberts Dear Mr. Reilly: As C requested in your letter of October 5, 1989, a six month extension of the Tigard Senior enter project is approved. The new termination date of the contract is April 30, 1990. If the City will propose to materially change the scope of the activities, please advise us so that we can formally amend the project agreement/contract. We look forward to this project proceeding according to the new schedule and being completed as expeditiously as possible. Keep us appraised, and don't hesitate to call us if you require any assistance. S cere , H.J. Ma c Progra Manager Offic o ommunit Development HJM/sa/ec Office of Community Development 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone:503 / 648-8814 LI 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 10-23-89 DATE SUBMITTED: 10-11-89 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Revise City/ PREVIOUS ACTION: State agreement for Hall Burnh intersection rovements PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: P LICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY In 1986, the City entered into an agreement with the Oregon State Highway Division (OSHD) to share the Cost of improvements to the Hall/Burnham intersection, including installation of traffic signals. Part of the project funding is from Federal Aid sources. New Federal regulations prohibit the use of Federal Aid funds on a project unless the Federal share is at least 50% of the project. Hall/Burnham does not meet this requirement. To avoid losing the Federal money, OSHD proposes to switch the Federal funding to the Hall/McDonald project, which will meet the 50% requirement. A corresponding amount of State funding will be switched from Hall/McDonald project to Hall/Burnham project. The total City share of the costs of the two projects will not change. A maximum City expenditure is specified on each project. To allow this change in funding to occur, it is necessary to amend the agreement. The attached resolution will allow the amendment to be signed by the Mayor and City Recorder. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution authorizing the amendment to the existing agreement. 2. Withhold approval of the amendment. FISCAL IMPACT 1. Approval of the amendment will cause no change in total City cost of the two projects. 2. Failure to approve the amendment may result in the loss of $31,713 of Federal funds. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the attached amendment. dj/SS-A-HBI.RW 44 CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON C~ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SL RY AGENDA, OF: October 23. 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 11. 1989 ISSUE/AGENM TITLE: Amoi.nt Deputy PREVIOUS ACTION: Recorders to Act as City Recorder In t OM 11 Certain Circumstances PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADNIIN OK REIQiJESTID BY: C. Wheatley & L. Wilson PO CY ISSUE Should the function of City Recorder be continued during absences of the City E Recorder (i.e., City business away from City Hall or personal leave time) and does Council wish to have Deputy Recorders appointed to handle the municipal court function. INFOR TIMON SC14U RY Currently, there is no back up for the office of City Recorder should she be away from the City. To assure continuity of services from the Recorder's office, staff recomTen3s that Liz Newton be appointed as Deputy Recorder. Ms. Newton will be filling the position of Cc mminity Involvement Coordinator on i October 30, 1989; she possesses thorough knowledge of meeting req irements for f the City of Tigard; and she has reviewed the land use appeal process with the i City Attorney and City Recorder as it pertains to the Recorder function. Historically, the Council has appointed Deputy Recorders to assist with the Court function; namely, the signing of criminal cauplaints and certifying documents for discovery and other purposes. The Administrative Services Manager supervises the judicial staff as well as the Records/Court Manager as she acts in the capacity of Deputy Recorder for court purposes. i ALTEEtNATTVES CONSIDERED 1. Appoint the Ccatmunity Involvement Coordinator as Deputy Recorder for city- wide function, and appoint the Administrative Services Manager and Records/Court Manager as Deputy Recorders for court-related purposes only. 2. Give staff further direction. FISCAL IMPACT' N/A SUGGESTED AC'T'ION Approve the proposed resolution. cw.depres CM OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA rl'R4 SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 12, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Board & Connni PREVIOUS ACTION: AM9intments PREPARED BY: Cathy Wheatley DEPT' HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK RDQUESTID BY: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The attached resolution outlines the reccmmendations of the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee for filling vacancies on various boards and ccmuittees. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the proposed resolution. 2. Adcpt the proposed resolution with amendments. 3. Decline action at this time. FTSCAL IMPACT N/A SUGGESTED ACTION Alternative No. 1: Adapt the proposed resolution. cw.bcappoint C C11Y ®F TIIFA RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME. - DATE: 9' x.21 ~p ADDRESS (RES. 41~0 yl,c~ ~2 RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDE14CE IN TIGARD: J 7~~2.3 SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: / s l4?10~ OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND j HOW LONG ~A,VE YOU BE N EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? t ,:S Tn-S 'C=f~&W LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY,))? S L ~ raC+ ~ ~?61~` `ID1L _ PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: (_!'"~)k,1- ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: ,Zo ~~.9•~ /~.EL'//J~~/1~B•c~ c~i/~/~~' OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMAkRKS): BO DS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: L Date received at City Hall 'q Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Halt Blvd., RO. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 D CITY OF T11FA RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME DATE : - Zl -`a ADDRF,SS (RES.): 11-755- S~ 13Z{ - RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): t ZS-Z-- ( C! J SC GS t=~e~s~ e~ BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: W5 C \-7r~sl~6 J WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? floz :p~-~ t3'S~ W'-j 1a-7 4-~ P"`►- l EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: P-S. WPteZ S ,C C a 001 y `{e- AMA-nc~-~,f Q-~ CA- c_- OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:' HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? ~r-S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: ~J1P~ W Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City 1C Pn 7 Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CITY OF TI6A R® CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: k'-XA 56Ln L3 rU5Sen DATE: Q, 1218-9 ADDRESS (RES.): 1223 RES. PHONE: IoZO-IIolZ-j ADDRESS (BUS.): P. 0. 1'~[7X ZOO , DIZ. BUS. PHONE: i5-i I - 46!5 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: ID (4F(t-5 SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? [20V "d, OBE EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: 7 M I "Ofptl ate-, o rrLeSeiv~.t- - 45 es r7►-tt~nn 5{zvCG gee v d o~-. OCCUPAT ONRL STATUS AND BACKG N Fe~,~i{~Pr. foIS55 nreS - gF-OC.VL~y~o0 -k1lal! 01 X - ! 61 ~ft-a Gh,i'.r i n HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? q- 162...., 1S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (N 10 APPLICA S ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: - ' OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Oate received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City sb/4772A/0002A 13125 SVV Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 r v } v September 15, 1989 Susan Grossen 10570 S. W. Park Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ms. Grossen: On behalf of Mayor Edwards and the Tigard City Council, I would like to thank you for your interest in serving on the Library Board. Your interest application has arrived and is being held for the next interview process. The Mayor's Appointments Advisory Connittee tries to meet 3 or 4 times a year to interview and rerommiend appointments to the City Council. It is anticipated that the next interviews will be held during September. You will be contacted when the date is determined to set up a specific time for interview. If you have questions, or I can help further, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Valarie Dionysius Executive Secretary vd/intltr CITY ®F TIVA RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: DATE : / 1a" f / ADDRESS (RES. ) : 14f&T RES. PHONE : 6a76' LOO. ADDRESS (BUS.) : O 000 < o216c I91ary1hurst 70.3(7 BUS. PHONE: 03,5-0SG'7 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD, /0 N/ SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ,h EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: w P~ti .,xLMQ16 V f lL'765 OCC ATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: ;Dt-f Ilbyz i -7"J/- ClaMMaS I_e E .S. .D- HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? / V/♦ .a THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? ' PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: /VO)IQ ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: done- OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): Q cta( 4fevi q83 %peertEneQ_ in commundy r2efiyi f;es -77 ~,~-culd be r► Qsse7l- -Ab fh15 borlrd hL.cau~e IZZ am ~L cfeayiYe fhlnker- •Eni~-LVCLln4 CC'S ,~Ctcf ~ „ f EYt/Ir , BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: L , -,Tar Date received at City Hall 7 /o? y/8 9 Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City sb/4772A/0002A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 July 24, 1989 Marla Resnick 14862 SW 106th Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Ms. Resnick: On behalf of Mayor Edwards and the Tigard City Council, I would like to thank you for your interest in serving on the Library Board. Your interest application has arrived and is being held for the next interview process. The Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee tries to meet 3 or 4 times a year to interview and reconmiend appointments to the City Council. It is anticipated that the next interviews will be held during September. You will be contacted when the date is determined to set up a specific time for interview. If you have questions, or I can help further, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Donna Corbet Executive Secretary do/intltr CITY OF TIGARD. ORE7C~ON COUNCIL AGENDA 1'EM SC14MARY AGENDA OF: October 23, 1989 DATE SUERiTiED: 10/13/89 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE; PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A rove pro-tem J e AMgintmenti. PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ALIT O / REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson POLL ISSUE The City Council decided in 1987 that it wished to have three pro-tem judges serve the Municipal Court. INFORMATION SCARY In 1987, Council appointed three pro-tear judges to assist with hearing and disposing of the Municipal Court caseload. Of those three, Nancy Campbell resigned to accept a position as Washington County District Court Judge; Kenneth Bourne resigned due to the recent dual lucrative law interpretation since he serves in Sherwood; and Janise Augur is still serving as a pro tem. Staff recruited interested attorneys from the tri-county area. 26 applications were received. Of those 10 passed the initial objective screening process and were asked to complete a supplemental questionnaire. Two service providers were rated highest at the end of the questionnaire review process. A brief synopsis of the two follows: o Attorney Bruce A. Liebowitz - lives and practices in Beaverton - has prior experience as a city and county prosecutor - specializes in traffic defense in private practice with experience also in criminal and civil cases. o Attorney Michael J. O'Brien - lives and practices in Forest Grove - has prior experience as district court judge - has experience in traffic, criminal, and civil cases in private practice. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDII2ED 1. Appoint Bruce A. Liebowitz & Michael J. O'Brien as pro-tem judges and approve personal service contracts. 2. Give further direction to staff. FISCAL IMPACT 1. Council authorized sufficient funds for 3 pro tems in the 89-90 budget. ACTION SUGGESTED Alternative #1 - Motion to appoint and approve personal service contracts. lw/ccprotem y r7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 23,1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 9,1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TI Gaarde House d PREVIOUS ACTION:purchase of property award. PREPARED BY: Development Services Mar. E DEPT. HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY;Community Development POLIC ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY s On April 10,1989 the City acquired the" Gaarde" house(original Gaarde% homestead) to facilitate the Gaarde Street Bond improvement project(see attached map). Subsequent to the acquisition, Council directed staff to sell the house through the sealed bid process for the purposes of relocating it to another lot. On September 26,1989 a bid opening was held with only one bid be submitted. This Bid was from Ron Soberg for $7,000. Ron's bid included one contingency and two request. The contingency was that he be able to purchase a lot from the Tigard Assembly of God church. Their congregation is expected to approve Ron's: formal offer on October 15,1989. His request are that the City waive permit b^ fees that are typically required when relocating a house and that he be given the front doors to the garage which is detached from the house and was not part of the bid. There appears to be justification for waiving SDC and sewer connection fees given the nature of the relocation (see attached memo). There also appears to be no reason why Ron could not have the doors since the City was going to destroy the garage anyway. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Award the bid to Ron Soberg subject to his ability to obtain a lot from the Tigard Assembly of God Church. Also include the garage doors and waive all City sewer connection and SDC fees. i 2. Award the bid to Ron Soberg subject to his ability to obtain a lot from the Tigard Assembly of God Church. Also include the garage doors and do not waive all sewer connection and SDC fees. t 3. Do not award the bid to Ron Soberg. FISCAL IMPACT $ 7,000 of revenue from the sale of the house. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council adopt alternative #1 as stated above. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON TO: Ed Murphy, Director of Community Development FROM: Randy Clarno, Development Services Manager., DATE: October 9, 1989 SUBJECT: Gaarde House Bid Award Findincts On September 26,1989 the bid opening for the Gaarde house was hsid and one bid was received. That bid was for $7,000 ($2,000 over the minimum bid required) and from three long term Tigard residents who have recently formed a construction corporation. The principal of the corporation is Ron Soberg. Their bid comes with one contingency and two request. They are: 1. A contingency that they are able to purchase a lot on Gaarde Street from the Tigard Assembly of God Church. They have made an offer to the Board of Directors which has been accepted and must be ratified by the congregation. The congregation is expected to approve this on October 15,1989. 2. A request that City permit fees be waived as demonstration of the City's interest in maintaining the Gaarde house in the City as part of the City's heritage. Staff is specifically asked to waive City permit and utility hook-up fees. Staff estimates they would normally be liable for the following fees: A. Street SDC $ 600 B. Park SDC 250 C. Storm Drainage SDC 250 D. Sewer Connection 1,250(1000-USA, 250-City) E. Sewer Inspection 35 F. Building Permit( a relatively small fee will be involved for moving and re-placement of the structure). Only $250 of the $1250 sewer connection fee comes to the City, the remainder goes to USA. This relocation does not create any new housing units nor allows that possibility since the land the house is being moved from will become public street right-of-way. In addition the house is currently hooked-up to the public sewer and paid connection fees at the time of hook-up. For these reasons it would seem appropriate for the City to waive sewer connection ( City's portion only) and SDC fees. However other fees such as inspection and building permit fees should probably be collected since they are cost recovery based. 3. A request that the front doors to the garage be included in the bid. The garage, which is detached, and other out-buildings were not included in the bid because they were not movable. However there appears to be no reason why the garage doors could not be given to them. Recommendation The City should accept the bid from Ron Soberg and his company with the following conditions: 1. That they are able to acquire the lot from the Tigard Assembly of God Church. 2. That the City waive all sewer connection and SDC fees; and 3. That the City give to Mr. Soberg the front doors of the detached garage. C 13755 SW 116th Place Tigard, Oregon 97223 September 26, 1989 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Relocation of "The Gaarde House" 10905 SW Gaarde Street Tigard I would like to offer the following as supplemental information to that which was required by the City of Tigard as part of my bid package for purchase and relocation of The Gaarde House now located at the above stated address. The previous and soul owner (until purchased by the city of Tigard) was part of the founding history of "Tigardville", as demonstrated by the fact that the street that the house now is sited on was named after the owner. It is therefore my wish to treat the structure with the historic respect that it is due as part of the iist.ory of our town. With this in mind, if I win the bid for the purchase of the house, my plans are as follows: 1. Relocate the house,to a lot west of the Tigard Assembly of God Church. 2. Maintain the exterior of the structure as it now exists, making only changes that might be necessary to repair any damage that may be sustained during moving or to bring the structure up to present codes. 3. Maintain the interior as it now exists with the following exceptions: o Redo the kitchen cabinetry to be all .one style that is consistant with the style of the time period the house was built. o Eliminate one bedroom on the main floor (the smaller corner room) and use that space to update and enlarge the hathroom and the the remaining bedroom. The bathroom would be Pnlarged to be r_onsi.stant with the rPquiremPnts of a 3 bedroom, 1 bath house, not to be a "master bedroom bath". Tn addition, all rewiring required to bring the house up to present codes will he completed, as well as any required repairs, add,iti.ons and/or deletions to the existing plumbing and heating system. C_ The Request for Bids states that the outbuildings are not included with the sale of the house. I would like to request that if I win the bid and if the plan of the city is to eliminate the outbuildings, the garage doors and hardware be included with the house so that the garage can be reproduced on the new site. I talked with 2 'souse movers earlier this summer and both said that the garage would nave to be moved or otherwise eliminated in order to get the house off the site without removing the big tree in front. In the face of all the new construction in the Tigard area, I beleive it is important to preserve a bit of the history of our town, even one small house. I am looking forward to working with the city to do so. S nc rely i Ron Soberg Tigard resident for 2 years. _ L 11 t I A•1- r' / ONNr.Y • V~ r wt ~ z ~.StY•.. t 11 1-F . Q Qn1~ ~Qtt3, ~ T7yy~s~t n F Li L Ws1 LitQ1 / t 41; Li 3Ar W08 woo ; '10 >t00YN3NW3Ar v% „u 3 •aA 3A )AV .t.s X0011, r307I N ! y '3M J _ JA=G aYl>rro AV Nis Fits • t.• < i $g W YIK ♦ •Yp`Z,JiW 3Ar Wis ;t(at, J H REROOr t YI SAY 4494 1 t?Q V'• 3I Z ^ 4! 4~ m g `6 t 3 ♦ i! ~ti\~' yp~ ~y dp`> iG •fn 3Ar > o d v ~ M G ~ ~ ~ ~ is >y Z ~ = WH a ~ os ~ ~ a 0a•~„ V{La 1 ♦ A. V ,11\NO I r -.1d ~W rq ; f Us A MILS n 1 'aAr YI/4 G i'4 / r ab~ w yF6 W 61A31n; W3AY vI P6 ~1~yy ' s t b 44 ~ +\p J a c 1 "1 W V 'a AV ^ W 1 CAIOAOC 1 wI- G < r va.~ G^ Mi,Ilaa W WG+ 3 o W F s~ >eTMJFU Ito -Ou W ,,1 ) .J1 i 6NI)iLYM H 3AY y L ~fjb H 7901 3Ar v1101 ~6 O i~AVt•~ G `i 3AY G 3Ar wLC • ~ 1~ tj. _ ~ Y, wool .fir ~ Ar a ^ § j iaw1 wI ~i c ='G am wso Y r` o' I ~o► ( AV le v 1~ m Op 'ld 11 iN i07 4 A " dy IIStF i ^ aooMx •ld yard •3AV G . C WAr YI►I ur/ s :u r 1 1,111 V' `a a o vlsu. o ~~~W~ G to i W •N ~ ~ Y s ~ YJ II \ r 0 ' 1A * d/~ 7111 iLVO. •Lw {tl V o / d Y7~ •a 3Ar y H .4 1 wll 1- <n w 10AYr11JMUVN ~ y in ~ ~ r~ ~d~y ~ Cb wsya tM Qv. • li .t Vs 0 O~IF'F~' '1d it g C = ^ WQ< I d, N ~ pool a a C &h CaI W i 1 i 01 _j G J g z 4 s iyG 7 ~Ar wta M 'awl 4.301 I ?_fil a C G uttl Wt; U G " W =I 5^ V ~~{p1 • ~ ~ r11i1 d! Al MR07 MOlIN/MlIN t!0 w N o~ Y YJiil a i+'' ~'1d M6i1 A - pit I - - - - - - - - - - T T-t' I I' - 1 i °0 L , I N I• I I j o I I = rho I' It D • I' A I I 1 i I I I ' o TIGARD ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH PARKING LOT CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 23. 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Final heari PREVIOUS ACTION: Hearing set by on SW 135t Avenue LID Resolution No. 89-78 PREPARED BY: DEPT HEAD Ok_U CITY ADMIN OK/ REQUESTED BY: P ICY ISSUE Public hearing on final assessments for the SW 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. INFORMATION SUMMARY October 23rd is the date set for a public hearing on the final assessment roll for the SW 135th Avenue LID. By ordinance, objections must be submitted in writing prior to the hearing and must specify the grounds for objection. Notices of the hearing were mailed to all property owners on October 12 and published in newspaper on October 12 and 19. Following the hearing, it is appropriate for the Council to adopt the final r assessment roll, with any revisions that may result from the hearing. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached ordinance adopting the final assessment roll and providing for installment payments. 2. Revise the assessment roll. FISCAL IMPACT The LID cost of $616,106.98 is borne by the LID property owners. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommendation will be presented at the close of the public hearing. dj/SS1-FH135.RW MEMORANDUM C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Recorder DATE: October 23, 1989 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer SUBJECT: SW 135th LID Final Assessments Late this afternoon, two errors have been brought to my attention that need to be corrected in the final assessment role. Parcel No. 323 is a non-developable tract used for driveway and landscaping. The assessment roll erroneously shows this parcel as a single-family residential lot. The assessment for Parcel No. 323 should be changed to $0.00. Parcel No. 349 has been subdivided. The new lots are shown in the assessment roll as Parcels No. 349-A through 349-E. However, Parcel No. 349 is still erroneously shown on the roll. Parcel No. 349 should be eliminated. br/135.rrw S. W. 135th Avenue LID Written Objections Filed with the City Recorder Prior to 5 p.m. on 10/23/89 1. Genevieve C. Burke 13. Tom Kroner; Sherry Simmons Kroner 13125 S.W. Chimney Ridge St. 13235 S.W. Brittany Drive 2. Joyce L. Collins 14. Mr. & Mrs. James L. Hicks 13114 S.W. Chimney Ridge Street 11625 S.W. Sheffield Circle 3. Troy Allen & Tania Kay Palmer 15. Roger & Jenna Johnson 13436 S.W. Scotts Bridge Drive 11665 S.W. Sheffield Circle 4. Eileen G. Rowe 16. Amir M. Fatehi; Carol L. Cutting 12240 S.W. Morning Hill Drive 13870 S.W. Hindon Court 5. John M. Collins 17. Amy and Max Schaefer 13136 S.W. Chimney Ridge Street 13350 S.W. Brittany Drive 6. MaryAnn Coon 18. *Casey Rushing 12098 S.W. Westbury Terrace 13335 S.W. Chimney Ridge Ct. 7. June M. Todd 19. *Larry Snyder 11801 S.W. Wilton 13315 S.W. Chimney Ridge Ct. 8. Ann K. Suer 20. *Scott Yale 13330 S.W. Brittany Drive 13355 S.W. Chimney Ridge Ct. 9. George and Donna Scott 21. Mr. & Mrs. Nicholas Koush 11640 S.W. 135th Avenue 13617 S.W. Fiering Lane 10. Richard & Kendra Steph 22. Scott Rice 12169 S.W. Westbury Terrace 13624 S.W. Feiring Lane 11. Jan T. and Melody Virding 23. Effie Roberts 13343 S.W. Shore Drive 13295 S.W. Chimney Ridge Court 12. Mark L. Lee 11860 S.W. Morning Hill *Three signatures on one letter. .i October 18, 1989 STAFF RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT S.W. 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Re: LID Parcel No. 386 (Burke) Prior to formation of the local improvement district in 1987, the Council gave extensive consideration to the question of how to fund the 135th Avenue improvements. The question of whether to use citywide funds for the improvements was heard and debated by the Council during several months of hearings and public meetings with property owners. The Council decision was to form the district but to pay from citywide funds the portion of the cost related to the bridge at Summer Creek. In 1988, voter approval of the Major Streets Traffic Safety Improvement Bond relieved some of the pressure for funding of street projects through the citywide street program. As a result, the Council was able to provide additional citywide funding to the 135th Avenue project. In the final assessment, the LID is paying only 46% of the project costs. Property owners were notified of a public hearing in August of 1987. Owners of single family subdivision lots were notified of estimated assessments of $998. Following approval of the Bond measure in 1988, residents were told that the revised estimates were approximately $500. The proposed actual final assessments are $532.85. These are the only cost figures which have been provided by the City. For qualified senior citizens, there is a state program providing for deferral of LID assessments. Information on this program has been provided to Mrs. Burke. c: Genevieve C. Burke dj/SRTOTPFA.RW C October 14, 1989 Local Improvement District City Recorder City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: objections to LID' assessment against Parcel No. 3U'U OBJECTIONS: 1. The tax is discriminatory: a. It applies only to specific homes in the area of the street improved although the street is open to everyone. A tollgate is the old fashioned way of handling such unfair practices. 2. Cursory notice by real estate salesmen regarding the very vague possibility of such a LID ever occurring. We were told that it would be covered by the general population of Tigard after coming to a vote. 3. The tax is unfair to the over 65 group of owners. Those of us who bought in this area did so because we thought it was stable. Now we find heavy increases in our annual taxation, heavier than many surrounding areas, and a steady increase in apartment dwellings which detracts from the secure community that we had hoped to find. ...On top of this, we now are supposed to pay a LID... AND I FIND THIS DEFINITELY OBJECTIONABLE. Genevieve C. Burke 13125 SW Chimney Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 C cp /a/1~1~9 L L { October 18, 1989 STAFF RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT S.W. 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Re: LID Parcel No. 356 (Collins) Prior to formation of the local improvement district in 1987, the Council gave extensive consideration to the question of how to fund the 135th Avenue improvements. The question of whether to use citywide funds for the improvements was heard and debated by the Council during several months of hearings and public meetings with property owners. The council decision was to form the district but to pay from citywide funds the portion of the cost related to the bridge at Summer Creek. In 1988, voter approval of the Major Streets Traffic Safety Improvement Bond relieved some of the pressure for funding of street projects through the citywide street program. As a result, the Council was able to provide additional citywide funding to the 135th Avenue project. In the final assessment, the LID is paying only 468 of the project costs. Property owners were notified of a public hearing in August of 1987. Owners of single family subdivision lots were notified of estimated assessments of $998. Following approval of the Bond measure in 1988, residents were told that the revised estimates were approximately $500. The proposed actual final assessments are $532.85. These are the only cost figures which have been provided by the City. For qualified senior citizens, there is a state program providing for deferral of LID assessments. Information on this program has been provided to Mrs. Collins. c: Joyce L. Collins dj/SRTOTPFA.RW October 13, 1989 City of Tigard Local Improvement District 13125 SW Hall Blvd P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: LID Parcel No. 356 This letter is written to protest the LID assessment against my property because of the improvement to SW 135th. That road is heavily used by apartment renters, but not by myself or those where I live. When we bought our home (my husband is in his 80's) we were assured that the debt would be taken over by the City of Tigard. Now I find that this is not so, just before we get notice of our property taxes (which we were told would be increased by several hundred dollars this year). This LID is a debt that, in all. fairness, should be absorbed by t•4e all the residents of Tigard, not just the few that are unfortunate enough to reside close to 135th. I hope you will give my appeal consideration, and not force still another move (because of taxes) upon those of us who are elderly. SincereLyy, Joyce L. Collins 13114 SW Chimney Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 //:vv l October 18, 1989 City Of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Randall R. Woolev Re: LID Parcel No. 349D Dear Mr. Wooley, There are several reasons why we object to the assessments on properities within the S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District: A) 135th Avenue runs directly behind our house. The City of Tigard recently raised the road, and now people using this road can see directly into our backyard. Privacy is a thing of the past. The City of Tigard promised to plant tall bushes to correct the problem. However, they have decided that the individual owners will be responsibile for the correction. We will have to raise our fence to correct this problem, at a cost of several hundred dollars that we had not counted on. More importantly, the property value value of our house has deminished because of the road ( being raised. B) When we moved into the neighborhood, we were not told of the assessment. People moving into the area should be notified immediately. C) The most frustrating realization is that 135th Avenue has not been improved. There are several pot holes, and the road is very narrow. The road in this condition is very loud, and extremely hard on cars. Please take all these items into consideration when you make jour decision. We remain, ~g' Troy Allen & Tania Kay Palmer 13436 SW Scotts Bridge Drive Tigard, OR 97223 ijECEIVIED 0 C T 2 01989 Canmi mib i)e ad October 18, 1989 city Council_ 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear City Council: I object to the proposed assessment for 135th Avenue for the following reason. I bought this home in `':ay, 1989, which was four and one-half months ago.. At closing or at any other time during the purchase of this property, I was not informed of this assessment. I contacted Chicago Title Company today where the closing took place and they said they were not informed o f any proposed assessment. I have not been able to attend or participate in any former hearings regarding this matter.. My neighbors have informed me that they have been involved with this particular issue for almost two years. Since I was not adequately informed or able to participate in any previous hearings regarding this assessment I strongly object to this proposal. Sincerely, Eileen G. Rowe 1291,n S. W. Morning Dill Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 s OCT 2 3 1989 t' OCT 17, vT 7[ 2 3 1989 John M. Collins 13136 SW Chimney Ridge St. Tigard, OR 97223 October 20, 1989 Mr. Randall Wooley or City Recorder 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Wooley: City Recorder RE: LID parcel Number 355 This letter is intended to voice my objections to the assessment for the improvement of SW 135th Av. The reasons are as follows: Upon purchasing this property in July of 1988 there was nothing disclosed concerning this assessment. The title company did not discover this because there was nothing recorded. It was only after moving in that a neighbor advised us that we may be billed for the pending improvement of SW 135th. Av. Had we known about this issue before purchase we probably would have negotiated it with the builder. Of all my neighbors subsequently contacted none have any recollection of ever voting on this issue and none know how this LID was ever formed. The letter recently received is the first official notification that we have ever seen although we have seen mention of an LID in the paper at one time. My question is who formed this LID that no one in this neighborhood is sure about it's origin? The lack of notification aside I object on the basis that SW 135th is not a street that is exclusively used by the local residents. Instead, it is used as a thoroughfare between SW Scholls Ferry and Pacific Hwy. In other words, far more non local people use this road than local. Why then j are the locals being billed separately? I would not have such a problem with this if the road was used primarily by the local residents. Not only are we paying for a road levy for all roads but are expected to pay a disproportioned amount for a road that happens to be in a close proximity to our home. I am quite aware of the statements that were made that if the road levy passed the LID amount would be less. That still does not make it right. Sincere OCT 2 3 19N Jo M. Collins t!2 LIJ Ll "Cl 11 r MARYANN R. COON 12098 S.W.Westbury Terrace Tigard, Oregon 97223 October 18, 1989 City of Tigard City Recorder 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: I am writing this in reference to the Notice of Hearing on Final Assessments for S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District which I received in the mail Friday, October 13, 1989. (I have attached a copy of the notice for your reference.) I have several reasons for objecting to this assessment on my property. First, the improvements on 135th Avenue were completed prior to the closing date of the purchase of my home in March, 1989. When I purchased my home, it was my understanding that I could not be charged for any existing liens against my property prior to the signing of the contract, and the developer/ owner, James McGehee, would be the liable party. My title insurance carrier was notifing the City of Tigard to check on existing liens/taxes at that time. So, I was extremely shocked to find myself being assessed for improvements that had not only taken place prior to the purchase of my home, but also that I had received no previous notification that there would be any such charges. I'm sure established homeowners in the area must have known about the street improvement & pending assessment charges, but because I didn't own my home until it was completed, I knew nothing about the entire situation. My second reason for objecting this assessment charge is that because of my concern about this matter, I checked with my next door neighbors who purchased & moved into their home the same time as I did. They i did not receive an assessment notice. So, I can't understand why I should be assessed over $500.00 for a street improvement that is not even adjacent to my home while they are not assessed at all. Finding this out made the situation even more confusing and frustrating to me. I am not trying to avoid my responsibility as a homeowner, but I really do feel that I have been unfairly assessed in this matter. I would appreciate your consideration in this matter and hope it can be resolved fairly. Sincerely, Mar coon t r OCT 231 9 8Ll October 12, 1989 NOTICE OF HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT'S FOR C17YOF Ti6ARD S.W. 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OREGON Mary Ann R. Coon 12098 S.W. Westbury Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LID Parcel No. 396 Dear Property Owner: The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 23, 1989, at Tigard City Hall, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, at 7:30 PM to consider written objections to the individual proposed final assessments on properties within the S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. The assessments on the proposed assessment roll, or as it may be modified by the Council, will be levied by the Council after the hearing and the assessment will be charged against the property. It will be immediately payable in full except where the property is eligible for installment payments. The proposed assessment roll is included in the final engineer's report. Copies of the final engineer's report are available for public review at the Tigard City Hall and at the Tigard Library. The proposed final assessment for your property, identified by Washington County Tax. Map and Lot Number 2S14BA 00700, is as follows: Basic Assessment $ 532.85 Right-of-Way Assessment $ 0.00 Total Assessment $ 532.85 The total cost to be assessed against the properties within the District is $616,106.98. The name of the owner, the description of the property assessed and the amount of the assessment against each described property is shown on the assessment roll. Only written obiections will be considered. All written objections must be filed with the City Recorder by 5:00 PM on October 23, 1989, at the Tigard City Hall, located at 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. All written objections must state specifically the grounds for the objection. 13125 SW Nall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 9VI g ~ r IF October 12, 1989 NOTICE OF HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSM EN,rS FOR CITY®F T'GAM S.W. 135TH AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OREGON June M. Todd 11801 S.W. Wilton Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LID Parcel No. 116 Dear Property Owner: The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 23, 1989, at Tigard City Hall, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, at 7:30 PM to consider written objections to the individual proposed final assessments on properties within the S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. The assessments on the proposed assessment roll, or as it may be modified by the Council, will be levied by the Council after the hearing and the assessment will be charged against the property. It will be immediately payable in full except where the property is eligible for installment payments. The proposed assessment roll is included in the final engineer's report. Copies of the final engineer's report are available for public review at the Tigard City Hall and at the Tigard Library. The proposed final assessment for your property, identified by Washington County Tax Map and Lot Number 1S133CD 11700, is as follows: Basic Assessment $ 532.85 Right-of-Way Assessment $ 0.00 Total Assessment $ 532.85 The total cost to be assessed against the properties within the District is $616,106.98. The name of the owner, the description of the property assessed and the amount of the assessment against each described property is shown on the assessment roll. Only written obiections will be considered. All written objections must be filed with the City Recorder by 5:00 PM on October 23, 1989, at the Tigard City Hall, located at 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. All written objections must state specifically the grounds for the objection. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., RO. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 t OCT' 3 198 . . J - Ali C ~~5 ~'CL~t'~t~/."-1~l.-SL~t01 j ~ i'1,~/~~ L``- f~~ ~i~ L'~ 5-, t~f~• r ~ P. C / -J l ~jU / (i° 1 Lei 1 ~~Zl2V j2--, ter} t l , LzI ' Igloo MEN- e'er f7 - - - L,-T, jz- E n October 21, 1989 TO: City of Tigard U 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd PO Box 23397 2 3 1989 i Tigard, Oregon 97223 r€ //,'w OCT RE: S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement Drist~44D-t..-A&s,ess..Mmm on LID Parcel # 161 (TL 300) and # 160 (TL 400) It is wrong for the City of Tigard to assess me $9,876.07 for my property and home with a total tax appraised value of $71.000. That makes the assessment 14% of the total value of my property. My home which is on TL 400 is assessed as six home sites or $3,197.11 plus the Right-of-Way assessment of $5,070.54. TL 300 which is adjacent to my home is assessed as one home site or $532.85 plus the Right-of-Way assessment of $1.070.54. TL 300 has no sewer stub and is 38' x 225' making it too narrow for even one building site without deeding land from TL 400. Because my home is centered on TL 400 and more property is needed from this TL to make TL 300 a buildable lot, the best I can hope for is my home site and one more building lot. The assessment on both parcels is figured on my property having seven building sites. I don't know how the City came up with this figure, but after the dust has settled from all the development around me, I'm left with a piece of property that after some engineering, surveying and sewer work expenses I have two building sites, my home site and one other. I should be paying for two building sites, not seven. I believe there are only three single family home sites on 135th that are affected by the LID..The rest of the property owners had more land and were forced to donate 135th extra Right-of-Way to get neccessary zoning for heir multifamily and single family subdivision protests. These property owners made a profit by the increased property values and the value of the donated land was just the cost of doing business. This is not true in my case. The City of Tigard has asked me to donate land from both parcels for the 135th LID. Why? The property has an appraised value of aproximately $ 7,200.00 (as per the Cith of Tigard). The the city has told me that if I don't donate my property for the 135th Right-of-Way, I would be assessed the value of the land plus all legal fees to foreclose on the property in addition to the basic assessment. It seems to me the the cost of acquiring properties to improve 135th should be shared by the whole improvement district, not by one individual. I think it unfair and unethical for the city to try to bully me into giving up my property. I don't know what options I have, but I've been treated unfairly by the City of Tigard and ask the City Counsil to look at my situation closely and approve these requests. 1. TL 300 pay one Basic Assessment of $532.85 2. TL 400 pay one Basic Assessment of $532.85 3. The City of Tigard pay my Morgage holders $7,200.00 for the land need for 135th improvements and that I pay no Right-of-Way Assessment 7Sincere and Donna Scott 11640 S. W. 135th, Tigard c 0(c), 6300 6.99 &n 3 t 01 ~Y R: vi w 21 R=125 x`.57- tr1 Rr17 TR' 0 620049 ~RX 530048 r 6929 a~2J R / N8000/ 4vd' 9°5616E b° ip C 1 r°' i> ij 7 /3 6000 610 m~ 20 5200 20 o'i46 Niwii w in 8) m ~5400~ I I e 10 ~~N Q 535.05 5.0 5900 `J m r 19 4 12 e?4 met;, 3 °c J 5100 ~hJ ♦4'P N.~`~ Rr 17 17 Rill 7 'N W V R=17 5.9 19 P~\ 'b~' / 90 0O 1A* 6•QS 66 ~i 1 N 26.69 37.03 III `R=17 l0 , `ice 6 9 M m R,17 2`~151I,II 22.93 104.96 h -11 M O 2 12.97 6 R=5d n S.W. g5? 65 8000 5000 39.99 S \26 43.08 50 50 43.91 X61900 \Z~ V' p 0 8 y6 ry°j 4600 R=17 71 ' 7 8 , II 1OZ. ° 53 p 11, 58000 5700 5600 5500_ ;g g 91.24 4900 4600 47004 a+ ° - (09.68 A~ 8100 00 N 16 15 14 13 8 A A 7 70, n - :0 7700 0 12 'a grt 1\~^J J 5 INITIAL INITIAL a° iP ° 161 2L1 1 J `r POINT M8403B 3B"W POINT 98.34 ~NZ S89°58'38"W AO 60 50 S0 S 10.64 3 64 40 93.45 55 00 10 0 n 48500 13 642 0 8900 100 §9300 5 200 n760 II 7 'p / 1H 130 Y ti 20 01" 72Ac. I 7500 n° 8400 21 14 19 I 6 in 8500130 3 69 8800~a~> v~ r 7400 15 bap 18 1 a° 560 in 5 Bo 300 ~l I rr, \ 100 rn 14.64 8700 /9Ac. r _,6 J 7300 to m 8600 m 17 2 4 ` 14 ^ 9 16 m dye ` 'O ,NI 5° 1330 9 ~ U7) - Y o 07 200 am e'en P I ~,,1 ~~2 13200 M ~ a' 0z 3\'°y7100 FJ 13~ h° 24.67 I'~ 2 1310023 -F - R / nma 7000 A 1' 13000'0, 22 50 R-IT 'a $to r~ ie.r1~X WEST 1 a AAp- ` 1 20' - 90.63 b°12900 O 90 q6 ~W O 35' 73.91 91.68 50' 40.63 50 ' 4S 111 'S 7 O A / N 8905 45.. E 9.37 92 ' 60 ,`,11 m 034 O 6 1480 OiP RING F11600 11500 11400 11300 11200 a '11000 .93 4 ktk; h^ 12600 0 N c 40 1 R` tey 19 nn c9 01 in Of _ a co ANE m 7 6 N 5 in 9 e9 ~g• nb 147001 d0v ~ - 4 ;12700 < 2 o a '11100 Q 18 46.02 3 f /040 1 ?4 rni / Q o n 100' v m I M84 ~6 00 3~9 .oQ 11700 one /99~ N J 2 It 12600 * 14600 r io t- ?,9 ` 50.52 50. r 9 Q 17 ° 1 v =0 8 m S 82 44.6 ♦1 n n J ° f~ 2 f00 is Q!• / 20.13 50 of Z M AURMpNT tib. S 81.42 2460 j( 51.97 10 9T 65 Of C ° Q =22 Of b I- 11800 .~a2g9 50.52 nS.W. Q 0 43.54 P' 12100 94.67 `°~j ♦ =2 ' 11900 12000 n 12200 ,♦1 va 9 86.24 \ 46p, 70 54~ 6 • N o P N °.•.12500 a 20.c0 7 i0 9 o m o to 13 N *0 o ° M 17500 17400" r ~ci 10 ~ I I a 12 a 102.74 e, M Io ' a T17600 w Cn 12300 cd rd on CIO, o12400 0 2 31 30 29 / N 89 49,16"w in 14 In 15 0 t 35' 0 35' 53.66 105.11 50' 50' 95' 101' In 6715 70' 54' I 116 ML 1% 035• 100 7 7;6 _'w 103.82 TRACT"N" 64.08 0 50 5 Of „ 2500 2400 2300 2200 2100 2000 1900 1800 1700 16 p INITIAL POINT N r e 53 m 5 2 0 51 50 0 in 4 Y 49 0° 48 47 46 N 45 in R~20 6o m - 01 79.7 37.61 37.61 75 77.45 R=15 I`g Re15 13 so so C (I e r•) t; :i. i ti I:c i. 1..1.::r> ) I I r' r;,.: l r • I . ai1 1:L c: )4t)i~ =i ,a )T'I f;i:CIRF, r.l . _[?f•,GIE)Y' (-':;•f::/t::,d) J .l ti:) ji!!!•It•!r= . ti 1 APT I_.C7'I° fa F•iciiF"I VFtl._l...E Y "I"1=tF=1i ;'r:) 1. .1 •'J C, I: ; L;' I = I t+c3 t i= I'I ' I. 1'11 c r . -I I"1 el u L I ` i•' l) I", J. 'v f-1 i._ i 1 . q . J. t , ID1# Bi 1 .1 1I1 I_e:v:i.ed fa'•: JI) 1,isr L!:I i 1 . 0 c).2 ; v 1 , 6 ..J,.J., 0 •:..,..1 I. I. « I .I. ; .I...J,~ 1'';(._ c.) r`• r`' en t 7 E~~ f o I I:; i. 1 :L t_i Thar d Date DUE-: L_t-a;ri.(---~ca T<:.as: Fa I• • •ss I: 7 r 1 I. r' c.l 1` t!. r.: I- I > w_ . - 311:-1 ! « ~I 1. 5A3-7, « 4 .L - _ i.:r 1. .I. « .I. ....1 « , r - • = .x.`11=1 . ~I't ~ '..J C_ « `l 1 , ~ J. ~ _ i -rc.)I:J.i s;ci:,ur., Enter ")'.:•I" to Change I-%r_,tch ln'formiatii n« "1:'" I;c:1 I 9• c.) r•' t h t~ 11 i. 7 c e 1 I a n P X u :o f= u n c t J. c-, n s, i•'i c r,1..i , f: . r' 1:, is ...f F•'rop rty ID IS.I. ' na I. I)essc r i h t i on : . IM AC PI L.-OT f~ ASH iL...__f 'r (,'T i EBCMT'1' „ G UFiG'F. U I: 11t:a 1 1.6/1. ? S;IIJ 1-:15-1-H i...a= t; i;r:, , r. « Ch r « .1.iT1r'!''':I.,1'!:iiii'I`1't.c_ G i.tUS : 11640 W AVE .1 111 L I'loi-t Lender: I:iVF-i - .2:3- ...l...l 6 + 0 :1. '.;YI----'@='c J. .1. 1•I:.~..:. nil i?i ii37),::~::'1`1 t: pia f).,+~,+~ LJi=)ri•=::3~ •F: I-1c~ "Fi(w"1.1,1r~1'.I" I:c~~~,,r: c :I: c~l(~r'i t; :i. fi'v f;t'i. a..l. r:> i c:,I. !.~r',::;i'-•~.:>t I:. r i .,or--ler t. : Iti:2'62E.31i.5 a r`.._(_1(5~'- C.)F. ..!-!...!F: c::?,e11 ^'i !.'r"'~t'= F t.: R C.!Ei: 1-1 'I::! i• Il.i •ii -'l' LOT %S (aS1•i 5;'(iLJ_.IE'Y T'FtAt'-"I':=, r D <-a tc h . ! r i c:i i n r.! a i. r - i= • 1. l1ri Ii1 11..1. 1I:7 L._(?•~~.l.r.?ri I'ras; 1':a;; 1:71_, i:^ lll'I:tF1.-L; ral'i1l0i .I 1. 47 t L`7S2 (FC~ --R[EDEP-IF'..1"1.01`d) . 199-- 1. Be1r -5 1.4• (L.IF:I'JI.ICILDE-F'', 1L-i~C''J1ts•.".'•=444. 1 (FC--PEN(` L..L.,,) -1 T GC..,_,3 t_)i_?(_? 1i?6. i.c~? !.,,.'_i..::.... ~ 6. 636 .2 84',51.21 9Cj El i Q . i 7 . ! .J Iry 1. ~ ? t-? ..7 ...1 1 1 i. ' .<:*A' E_rit-r^ "C" to C.;r.:.,n'tinur•::; i; j:: This pr oper,ty i.9 t..(ndc-n, ftar^~_'r:l.(~ ur Depress tl-ii•'- "RETUFUA" k.ey- (;(_tr`r-F_n't Ar-,r)rAis.-ro.1. Fy'(::)I=`t?t"'I:~' CI7 F%'262'E,,-.5 1. r rI<_1:I. I:7rsc r": i. F:, t; J. c:)ri; .:L'i'Flt_: I 1 L._fa1 1 F1' L. Owner 't 622"'.2% .2 .~,r!~y L.....t~?'• t; 1-!:::Ir ;i r: E;t.::UTT , GL_OF;t,[ la 1:)Cll',I1l"•lA t1 L_ ~ :I. t_t t..;tt •:I C:':...: r.i 1.1.6 4C? SW 1: 5 fH (-VE::I',!!_ll_ t._s,.::> TIGr-lRD, OR 77 t t l_l'i3 I " 1 i':• L._ ::l t l i J . Code (.lr't.'.ra 05 1 85 r;y r ! C.) iii:• .I. ri i5'. •E` i::: , ..,.N:?- I'lol't l.._iDricl r' •__:l.,-:e1. i-~Ei ,:~t'iri„fa11 i r. ~ 1: ep r'?a5 s thy "NETLIRIT' 4ti v= J. October 22, 1989 la zar` q ! 0'bJ ' City of-Tigard i 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 iE Richard & Kendra Steph 12169 S.W. Westbury Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 r Re: Final Assessments For LID Parcel No. 429 i Dear City Counsel, j As per your October 12th, 1989 notice of hearing correspondence, this is our written objection to the proposed basic assessment against our property. We hope you carefully evaluate the current position of levying an assessment against only those within the S.W. 135th Avenue Local C Improvement District. Following are our objections: 1. We believe that this road improvement has benefited the entire community. This is evidenced by the increased use of 135th Avenue. This road is very convenient for those who would like to get to downtown Tigard and highway 99 heading both east and west. With E the increased congestion on Scholls Ferry from 121st Avenue to Progress many drivers elect to bypass this via 135th Avenue. With the entire community deriving benefit from this road improvement, it is not equitable for only those within the S.W. 135th Avenue LID; G to fund the entire project. 2.,With projected plans to continue Murray Blvd. into our neighborhood, we believe this access road would have needed to be improved to handle the increased road use. Again as these road improvements will benefit the entire community it is not equitable for only those within the S.W. 135th Avenue LID to fund this improvement district. 3. The neighborhood you intend to assess is largely made up of first ROME time home buyers and young families. It seems unfortunate that not only is this assessment not based on useage of the improvements but it is being levied against a group of taxpayers that can probably least afford it. The amount assessed against those families puts a great strain on their budgets. 4. There are several planned subdivisions within a very close proximity to the S.W. 135th Avenue LID. The road improvements made to 135th Avenue will also benefit these new families to the community. Some of these subdivisions are currently underway while others are only in the first stages. We must consider who will derive benefit from the road improvements now and in the future. As you can see, our objections center around how the entire community benefits from this road improvement. Not just those within the S.W. 135th Avenue LID. To levy an assessment against few, to benefit many, is unjust. We could understand paying for improvements such as hook- up to a sewer, because we would derive all of the benefits. But we do not agree with our funding of this project. We realize this is a C difficult problem to resolve. We hope you stronly consider our object- ions along with those of the other residents within the LID. Respectfully, Dick & Kendra Steph t } October 12, 1989 I NOTICE OF HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY®F T'VAR i S.W. 135TH AVENUE € LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OREGON r' Richard A. & Kendra J. Steph 12169 S.W. Westbury Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LID Parcel No. 429 Dear Property Owner: The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 23, 1989, at Tigard City Hall, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, at 7:30 PM to consider written objections to the individual proposed final assessmefits on properties within the S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. The assessments on the proposed assessment roll, or as it may be modified by the Council, will be levied by the Council after the hearing and the assessment will be charged against the property. It will be immediately payable in full except where the property is eligible for installment payments. i The proposed assessment roll is included in the final engineer's report. Copies of the final engineer's report are available for public review at the Tigard City Hall and at the Tigard Library. } The proposed final assessment for your property, identified by Washington County Tax Map and Lot Number 2S14BA 03200, is as follows: Basic Assessment $ 532.85 Right-of-Way Assessment $ 0.00 Total Assessment $ 532.85 The total cost to be assessed against the properties within the District is $616,106.98. The name of the owner, the description of the property assessed and the amount of the assessment against each described property is shown on the assessment roll. Only written obiections will be considered. All written objections must be filed with the City Recorder by 5:00 PM on October 23, 1989, at the Tigard City Hall, located at 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. All written objections must ' state specifically the grounds for the objection. h pia 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 C Page 2 Notice of Hearing on Final Assessments for S. W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District Any questions regarding the filing of objections or the basis for the assessment should be directed to Randy Wooley, City Engineer, at 639-4171. Sincerely, Randall R. Wooley City Engineer fr/NOHFA135.RW /04~ /Sy October 23, 1989 City Recorder Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 To whom it may concern: This note shall serve as our objection to the assessment for work preformed on SW 135th Avenue under the Local Improvement District. Our objection is a simple one. This is the first we have ever heard of this or have been notified of such. That seems wrong. It is our understanding now from a recent conversation with the City Engineers Office that notices of this assessment went out to local home/landowners in August of 1987, well before we bought or built our home. Had we been notified of this or been given an opportunity to voice or vote over it previously, we would feel better about owing this, but finding out you owe $532.00 for roadwork you knew nothing about and not hearing until one year after you move in, doesn't settle well or feel fair. As there was no record of this assessment the title search showed no such future debt (yet one had obviously already been determined), our mortgage and title companies were unable to instruct us or arrange for a trust fund to be set up to pay this bill. Additionally, the party from which we bought our property failed to make note of this assessment and as such we feel the onus to pay this bill falls on the City for not filing, agaipst our property, and the owner of the property for failing to inform us of this assessment. We trust that due to these circumstances our bill will be nullified (and the former landowner billed in stead) or at worst we pay a substantially reduced amount. Thank you for you consideration. Sin rely, Jan T. Melody Virding 13343 S Shore Drive Tigard, R 97223 R : Parcel No. 278 a'YJ i October 12, 1989 NOTICE OF HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT'S FOR C,~r®~ S. W. 135T'Ii A V EN U E LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OREGON Mark L. & Lynnett D. Lee 11860 S.W. Morning Hill Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LID Parcel No. 82 j Dear Property Owner: The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 23, 1989, at Tigard City Hall, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, at 7:30 PM to consider written objections to the individual proposed final assessments on properties within the S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District. The assessments on the proposed assessment roll, or as it may be modified by the Council, will be levied by the Council after the hearing and the assessment will be charged against the property. It will be immediately payable in full except where the property is eligible for installment payments. i The proposed assessment roll is included in the final engineer's report. Copies of the final engineer's report are available for public review at the Tigard City Hall and at the Tigard Library. The proposed final assessment for your property, identified by Washington County Tax Map and Lot Number 1S133CD 07200, is as follows: Basic Assessment $ 532.85 Right-of-Way Assessment $ 0.00 Total Assessment $ 532.85 The total cost to be assessed against the properties within the District is $616,106.98. The name .of the owner, the description of the property assessed and the amount of the assessment against each described property is shown on the assessment roll. Only written objections will be considered. All written objections must be filed with the City Recorder by 5:00 PM on October 23, 1989, at the Tigard City Hall, located at 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. All written objections must state specifically the grounds for the objection. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 Page 2 Notice of Hearing on Final Assessments for S. W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District Any questions regarding the filing of objections. or the basis for the assessment should be directed to Randy Wooley, City Engineer, at 639-4171. Sincerely, Randall R. Wooley City Engineer fr/NOHFA135.RW October 17, 1989 , City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Op~QOe PO Box 23397 Tigard OR 97223 -z "o' 'Y1 RE: FINAL ASSESSMENT FOR SW 135th Avenue Dear City of Tigard, We are writing in response to the notice of final assessment for SW 135th Ave. local improvement district. It does not seem fair to us that we are being assessed $532.85 for the improvements made to 135th Avenue for several reasons. First of all, it is more than just the three subdivisions that benefit from the improvements. 135th has become a major throughfare in the last year. The residents of the many new apartment buildings along .135th are now very probably primary users of 135th. We doubt very much that the apartment owners are being assessed $532.85 for each apartment that they own. Why should they be subsidized in this manner by the city? In addition, the Walnut Street 135th Street corridor is becoming an even larger tributary in the Tigard transportation network and therefore the cost should be shared by the whole area. Since the LID that brought about the 135th improvements, there has been a levy passed that will improve many more roads in Tigard, but with the cost being absorbed by all (including ourselves) which seems like an acceptable and equitable way. Our property taxes went up $30.00 per month in 1989. Shouldn't this increase help pay for the local road improvements already? We therefore request that our assessment be dropped and the cost paid for out of the Tigard general fund or out of the other recent road levy. That would be the fair way. Aren't all parts of Tigard equal? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Tom Kroner Sherry Simmons Kroner 13235 SW Brittany Drive Tigard OR 97223 626-.1001 F, OCT 2 3 1989 Mr. and Mrs. James L. Hicks 11625 SW Sheffield Crl. Tigard, OR 97223 City of Tigard Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Written Objection to Final Assessment Lot #1S133DB 01700 City Council: As property owners of the above Lot Number, we object to the assessment against our property for the improvement of SW 135th Ave. When we purchased our property in 1987, there was no information give,nto us regarding the improvement project. We did not vote for the improvement or have any vote for or against the improvement. We were satisfied with the condition of the road and property as it was or we would. not have invested in our home in this location. In fact, we were very favorable of the country-like atmosphere that Britnay Square in General and Sheffield Crl in particular presented. The improvement of SW 135th has not been an improvement as we see it. A quiet country road has turned into a major raceway. Cars that once used I-5 to access Tigard now use 135th and the traffic is horrible. The cars drive 60-70 miles an hour at all times day and night now it's a thoroughfare.,-- At present, we are trying to sell our home. We have had three real estate agencies give us a value analysis of our home and all three have informed us the value of our home is $3,000 less than any other home in Sheffield Crl. because the back abutts 135th. The improvement of 135th has devaluated our home by $3,000 dollars. The real estate agencies told us if they could move our home just across the street our home would be worth $3,000 more. It would seem the City of Tigard should be repaying us rather than we paying them. In addition, the upkeep of the easement on 135th by the City is deplorable. My husband mows behind our house in order to make it presentable for sale of our property. The City has done nothing about the problem, but bend the weeds over when they come around every 4-6 months. This summer, the weeds were taller than the Brittany Square fence. We pay a gas tax that is for road improvement as well as other road improvement taxes and we feel that the money derived from that source should be sufficient for 135th improvement. It would seem that the City of Tigard is trying to RIP off tha Gi ti zer~G - i L .n~ f • OCT 2 ~ i969 ~5 v an ROGER A ANNA JOMW9ON - 11865 S.W. SHEFFIELD CIA. TIGARD, OR 97223 - - - - ~ F • ---~.S-S2s5. W~u~'. • ~=1~ --.~ct-.v-c~-l--__ _L~/_o_. 1.3 - - - - 42 C2-4~~ _ - - P.t~ ~G c4S c V+~4Yv~4- .n `~~s - Ct rec_ - 4(! ~3~'rf,~ve Loas_ Wis. k ROGER S JENNA JOHNSON 11685 S.W. SHEFFIELD CIR. TIGARD, OR 87223 i G'i-tM l2of (~JV r- . ,:r Clr~fj 4t - - Yi ma-191, cf vy"' `mac Y-RS4 c,4- 1 - c- `-.(/`e i A - wLe!_r-e- Jf _ 4 cin ~,c.~ - - o _---is - - - ! - _ ___._~-~,~►-ks---~-~ ~~I~ . c.G~.- - mss..... ~►~-E-~~ VIP 0( Al 51. dYrnQ--- as~C~yt llf - ,---(/-is . _Far-c._._a _ _ __C - c,,,~ c~.s • - tit.) e-~(,-- w~- d-f=-- V L Q--f--i- - - Ca ~~S 7- i IMER 8i JENNA JOHNSON 11866 S.W. SHEFFIELD CIR. TIGIARD, OR 97223 i - ---SCE-~ --,~-~-s b~-- - _ l-~. G (sue --_g~SS- -~L - -~e_- - t_ r r _ E rjoM JJJENNA JOHNSON 11M M SHEFFIELD C UL TIGARD, OR 97223 c t-- ------°___._1~CJt-~t-.. 5-~2sZ y _._.~.~~----------►-~~~rl-u-2 rw~~%vtl - - - - - - - -.~iu"_ .'.v_Q_ . _ -i - --C-e o~ ---C-cZS.~_ _ Y1! - - Tkil Q --w-- - - - _ -,t.~~- c - O C T 2 3 1989 Community Development Mr. Amir M. Fatehi Ms. Carol L. Cutting 13870 S.W. Hindon Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 641 - 6272 October 23, 1989 Tigard City Hall 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Final Assessments for S.W. 135th Avenue To whom it may concern: Our reason for this letter is to object to the proposed final assess- ment that is going to be made against our property. As first time buyers, we feel it is ruly unfair that we should have to pay for something that was previously set-up (1987), long before our move into the area. On top of this, the builder, the realtor, and the mortgage company never informed us of any form of property assessment previously made against the area in question. Excluding the final paving this summer of our court and the surrounding streets in our immediate neighborhood, 135th Avenue as a completed de- velopment before we purchased our home. I believe what I am driving at is this; why should we be charged for something that was decided on long before our involvement in the area, a decision we had no say in and something we were not informed of at the time we purchased the home? I feel the fault lies with the builder, who probably knew of the assessment and never bothered to tell us. I would like to be given the chance to speak to the Council on the issue at hand. Sincerely, Amir M. Fatehi R~~.EI'v tcv October 21, 1989 DOT 2 3 1989 Mr. Randall Wooley Community DMIOpmeM City Engineer City of Tigard Tigard, OR Dear Sir: We purchased our home at 13350 S.W. Brittany Drive in late August 1988 moving in on the 24th, the day work began on 135th. Several weeks later a lady came to our door with a petition concerning the improvement assessment on 135th. This was the first information we had been given concerning the residential assessment. We would like to give you our objections to this assessment. 1. If this is Tigard policy to upgrade it roads by means of local homeowner assessments then there should also be a Tigard policy that requires homeowners and/or realtors to disclose this information. Our purchase aggreement asks if there are any "pending" assessments to this property. A question which the homeowner and realtor answered "no". We are attempting to locate the former owner. Needless to say we feel that we've been had H 2. We purchased our home primarily because we wanted a quiet neighborhood. A sunday walk will show you that 135th has now become a thru-way and has opened our quiet community to increased speeding traffic. On Sunday, October 8th we stood on 135th near the apartment complex so we would be in a position to watch traffic. In a 15 minute time frame 7 cars turned in/out of neighborhood streets; 22 cars drove straight thru. When we leave for work in the mornings, one must be "on the look out" for the fast moving cars who are using this street as a short-cut or thru-way. We visited the Tigard city office and looked at the assessment roll, the letter then had been sent to homeowners and the map of the area being assessed. Perhaps a study should now be done to determine the percentage of cars using this street who are not local residents. It appears to us that we residents are expected to pay for a Tigard city main thru-way. We appreciate the time you have taken to read our objections and you can understand the position-we have been placed in. Sincerely, r i GG ' ice; . 9 e 6' ? -G Amy (W Max"Schaefer ' r 13350 S.W. Brittany Drive Tigard, OR 97223 ( OCT 2 3 1989 October 22, 1989 Community De"lopmeM Randall R. Wooley City Engineer City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LID Parcels Nos. 311, 312, 313 Dear Mr. Woolley: Grounds for our objection to the individual proposed final assess- ments on our properties within the SW 135th Avenue L.I.D. are: 1) The completed project is far and above more than what the HOMEOWN- ERS IN THE L.I.D. area desired (i.e. 3 lane width, bridge, sidewalks, street lights, etc.). 2) It is unfair for the homeowners to financially support a project that will not provide a cash return like the SUBSTANTIAL return that the apartment developers will reap. 3) It is unfair to this group of residents to be individually charged for major street improvements (creating a "minor con- nector" to Scholls Fry. Rd., Murray Rd., & who knows when other projects in the area are paid through taxes paid by all residents. 4) Peior to the last election, our previous Mayor of Tigard stated that if elected he would reduce by half the assessment amount to property owners within the SW 135th L.I.D. The statement not only smacks of vote buying, but also makes us believe the Mayor should also have the power to pay for the entire cost of the L.I.D. improvements out of city funds. It is apparent now that you were not interested in the wishes of the homeowners; we are not interested in paying for YOUR improvements. t. Sincerel r Larry nyder Casey Rushing Scot le 13315 SW Chimney Ridge Ct.13335 SW Chimney Rdg. Ct. 13355 SW Chimney Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Rdg. Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 Parcel # 311 Parcel # 312 Parcel # 313 - L4 ► ~T REUEivtu a5 . OCT 2 3 1989 Dommunlt► Developmod Scott Rice 13624 SW Feiring Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Oct. 23, 1989 Tigard City Council { Re: Objection to 135th LID Final Assessment y r Dear Sirs, f c I would like to object to the final assesments on the 135th LID. It would appear that the assessments on undeveloped land are based on the intentions of the owners rather than on the actual legal limits to development as indicated by the zoning. We all know that plans often change in this neighborhood. If we assess based on the best intentions of the owner at this time and actual developement eventually exceeds their intentions, we have no way to recover moneys lost. Let me give some examples. Mr. Kruger owns 71 acres within the LID zoned approximately 1/2 R-12 and 1/2 R-25. A plat has been filed r for 85 single family lots on a portion of this parcel. The proposed assessment is based on trips by those 85 families. However, Mr. Kruger is not yet required to develop these 85 lots. He can submit alternate plans or sell the land to others to develop up to the maximum allowed by zoning. It can happen. As an example of how things can change, look at phase II of the Sunflower Apartments. These units were excluded from the LID boundaries based on the intention to build a primary access to Scholl's Ferry Road. What we have today is an emergency only exit to Scholl's and 77 apartments exiting onto 135th without paying a dime towards improvements. I understand that we have no legal recourse to include them again in the assessment. I do not wish to point a finger at Mr. Kruger or Sunshine Apartments. They are two cases I am most familiar with. The potential for change exists on every undeveloped lot. In conclusion, I ask that assessments on all undeveloped land be based on the maximum legal occupancy of the land and not on a lower occupancy as projected by present owners. Sincerely, Scott Rice i t r i 10-23-89 02:23PM FROM Smith's Tigard ~0, a ~~rrv~ Pr" r ' ..r / wet Ile' ~r~ 10/23/89 14:22 0503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD ~ 001 ACTIVITY REPORT RECEPTION OK TRANSACTION # 2392 CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID G3 START TIME 10/23 14:21 USAGE TIME 00'49 PAGES 1 C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ( n COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY w AGENDA OF: October 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 11, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 89-07/ ? PREVIOUS ACTION: Reviewed by Planning k/ ZC 88-07 Met er-Ems Rockwell / Commission on October 3 1989 PREPARED BY:,- Jerr Offer Planner DEPT HEAD .O CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Ed Murphy, CD Director POLICY ISSUE ! Should the City redesignate approximately 5.02 acres from a Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial Professional and a zoning designation of C-P (Professional/Administrative Office Commercial) to a Plan designation of Medium High Density Residential and a zoning designation of R-25 (Multiple-Family Residential, 25 Units Per Acre)? The applicants urge the City to approve the proposal in order to provide for multi-family opportunities within close proximity to the Triangle area and major traffic corridors. Opponents view the proposal as providing the potential for greater impacts upon the established Rolling Hills neighborhood which abuts the site. INFORMATION SUMMARY On October 3, 1989, the Planning Commission reviewed the above described Plan Amendment/Zone Change proposal. The subject site is located at 13265 SW 72nd Avenue, south of Varns Street. The site is currently developed with one single family residence. The site abuts the developed, single-family residential Rolling Hills subdivision on the north, west, and south sides. The Planning Division staff report recommends approval of the proposal based upon findings that the proposal is consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Plan policies, the Plan's locational criteria for the Medium- High Density Residential Plan designation, and a finding that a mistake had been made in original Plan designations. Staff noted that the Plan's locational criteria and policies call for multi-family housing opportunities to be provided near employment and commercial centers and near primary traffic corridors and transit routes. Staff noted, however, that multi-family housing opportunities provided by the existing Plan and zoning maps, (especially with regard to developable properties) are extremely limited near the Triangle, Lincoln Center/Washington Square, SW 72nd industrial corridor, downtown, and near I-5 and Highway 217. Staff's recommendation for approval of this proposal noted that approval would be a step towards correcting this mistake with resultant benefits for the entire community by making a traffic sensitive locational decision. The applicants concurred with the staff analysis and added testimony regarding the site's poor suitability for typical C-P uses as well as a change of circumstances regarding changed markets for office and multi-family development. The applicants added testimony regarding how apartment development on the site could be sensitive to the needs of the adjacent single family neighborhood. Public testimony at the Planning Commission hearing was mixed. Proponents cited reasons why the property was unsuited for typical C-P uses and that the proposal was an opportunity for quality development of the site. Opponents noted potential conflicts with the adjacent neighborhood including increased traffic, noise, crime and fireplace smoke as well as potential decreased property values and the need for the City to assure the neighbors' expectations for the property. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend denial. Commissioners noted that the proposal would likely result in a quality development for the site, but the Commission was not convinced that a change in circumstances affecting the parcel or a mistake in Plan designations had been demonstrated. Commissioners noted that this was a difficult recommendation to make because they found that the site satisfied the applicable locational criteria and the site is well located with respect to proximity to employment/commercial centers and transportation corridors. However, the general sentiment of the Commission was that there is an obligation for the City to assure the neighbors' expectations for the future development of property through denial of the proposed amendments. Attached is a vicinity map; the Planning Division staff report; the October 3, 1989 Planning Commission minutes regarding the proposal; the applicants' proposal description booklet; and written comments on the proposal received by the Planning Commission. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve as recommended by staff. 2. Deny as recommended by the Planning Commission. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the proposed Plan/zoning map amendments. Adopt the staff report as findings supporting the approval and supplement these findings as necessary. Direct the staff to prepare a final order. br/CPACC.jo "VALL iRLET 01 X Pi -~JI I - 4 ART __LLTLMSIOM-- O!• O ' R , --VT 36 I - - - (PDT 9 ~ II R! •ylp(ll h. ~p 3w. • SIT O E IM9 • RMO `I l Kr FRRRKLIM T • - 4~~ i ~ 1i • 7.K 1[KL.aR 3Ti R w S.1r tO11LRM ai. pHlL LEN 4ptf+ ELEMENTARY Y yL a aT SCHOOL. •1 ~L sr. s • f-1Rww+T r . .10 - e~ l Sw Q A T - Y p ~ s..+. yll - sTg4 r _ i•'. JT&C" CENTER DRIVE • / Z 't7 11 12 _i_. - S: oLOw cE ~ u I c•ffr f, 1 ~ l L ~t 1 b ER caI1K[[wsw. ~w o i ,hp u sT„ m= MIA 's ► 1 S. II.ET T I - Zonr/ /1i'G AAP AGENDA ITEM ~i STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: October 3, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. HEARING LOCATION: Tigard City Hall - Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 89-07/Zone Change ZC 89-07 REQUEST: 1) Plan Map Amendment from Commercial Professional to Medium-High Density Residential. 2) Zone Change from C-P (Professional/Administrative Office Commercial) to R-25 (Multiple-Family Residential, 25 Units Per Acre) APPLICANT: Criterion Equities AGENT: OTAR, Inc. (Mark Rockwell) (Ralph Tahran) 1800 One Main Place 17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd. 101 SW Main Street Lake Oswego, OR 97034 t. Portland, OR 97204 OWNERS: David Metzger Raymond Ems P.O. Box 275 13400 SW 76th Avenue Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97223 (Tax Lots 800 & 801) (Tax Lot 3600) LOCATION: 13265 SW 72nd Avenue. Approximately 5.03 acres located on the west side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street (see vicinity map, Page 10) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WCTM 2S1 1DB, Tax Lots 800 and 801 WCTM 2S1 1DC, Tax Lot 3600 (portion) 2. Background Information Creation of tax lots 800 and 801 from a single parcel was approved through Minor Land Partition MLP 1-81. The Plan and zoning designations for these parcels were changed from R-7 (Residential, 7,500 square feet minimum lot size) to their current Commercial Professional/C-P designations during city-wide Plan and zoning map revisions in 1983. No other previous land use or development applications regarding these properties have been reviewed by the City. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 1 3. Vicinity Information Adjacent properties to the north, west, and southwest are zoned R-3.5 r (Residential, 3.5 units per acre) and are developed with single family residences. Properties directly south of the site are zoned C-P and are presently vacant or occupied by single family residences. Properties across SW 72nd Avenue from the site are also zoned C-P. These properties are developed with a number of office buildings containing a variety of commercial and professional uses. The subject site has 367 feet of frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. SW 72nd Avenue is functionally classified as a major collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. SW 72nd Avenue is developed with 44 feet of pavement, curbs, storm drains, streetlights, and a sidewalk along the site's frontage. The site has slightly more than 600 feet of frontage along SW Fir Street. SW Fir Street consists of 20 feet of gravel covered right-of- way which dead ends into the driveways of residences to the south of the site. The Transportation Plan Map designates SW Fir Street as a local street. Fully developed local streets typically consist of 50 feet of public right-of-way improved with full street improvements. i / 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The subject property consists of three parcels totalling approximately c 5.03 acres, including a 16.5 foot by 630 foot section of tax lot 3600 between SW Fir Street and the other involved parcels. The remainder of tax lot 3600 is not included in the proposed Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change proposal. Tax lot 800 contains a house in its northeastern corner. The other parcels are vacant. The site contains a grove of trees in the northeastern corner of the site. The remainder of the site is mostly open and covered with grasses, weeds, and fruit trees. The parcels are relatively flat with a slight slope towards the east. The applicants request a Plan Map Amendment from Commercial Professional to Medium High Density Residential and a zone change from C-P (Professional/Administrative Office Commercial) to R-25 (Multiple- Family Residential, 25 Units Per Acre) for the subject parcels. Although a development plan for the parcel need not be submitted for a proposed plan/zone change, a conceptual site plan illustrating how the site might be developed with a multiple-family residential development has been provided by the applicants. The applicants, intent in ' providing the conceptual site plan was to illustrate that a multiple- family development which would comply with the Community Development Code's density transition requirements could be constructed on the site. Code Section 18.40.040(A) requires that area within 100 feet of an established area not be developed at a residential density greater than 125 percent of the allowed density (as specified by the Comprehensive Plan designation rather than the current zoning STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 2 i designation) of the adjacent established residential area. For the subject properties, areas within 100 feet of the Rolling Hills Subdivision to the north and west could not be developed at a density greater than 6.25 units per acre because the maximum density allowed by the Plan's Low Density Residential designation applied to Rolling Hills is 5 units per acre. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has reviewed the request and has commented that development of the site with a multiple-family residential development in the R-25 zone, would generate substantially fewer vehicle trips per work day on adjacent streets as well as lesser t traffic peaks at typical AM and PM rush hours as compared to office ! development in the existing C-P zone, . Development of the site under either the C-P or R-25 zones would require increasing the rights-of- way for both SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street and would also require substantial improvements to SW Fir Street. Storm and sanitary sewers to serve the site are available in SW 72nd Avenue. NPO #5 has reviewed the proposal and has commented that they believe that the majority of the neighbors of the subject property oppose the project. Planning Division staff attended a neighborhood meeting for review of the proposal. Some neighbors commented that they favored the proposed plan/zone amendment because they felt it provided the opportunity for a quality development on the site as opposed to other uses that could t be located on the site under the present zoning. A number of neighbors voiced opposition to the proposal and made comments related to increased neighborhood traffic on evenings and weekends, the potential "domino effect" this proposal might have on later rezoning in the neighborhood, the compatibility between low density and high density development, the need for additional multi-family housing opportunities, and the effect this proposed action might have on neighboring properties' values. Other comments related to specific items the neighbors felt should be considered in the review of a site development plan for the property. ! i The Building Division, the Tigard School District, and Metzger Water District have reviewed the request and made no comments•or objections regarding the proposal. C No other comments were received. s B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, 10, 12, and 13; Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.3.2, 6.3.3, 6.5.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1, 7.8.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 9.1.2, and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria; and the change or STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 3 mistake quasi-judicial map amendment criteria of both the Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code. The Planning Division concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the following findings: 1. Goal #1 (Citizen Involvement) is met because the City has adopted a citizen involvement program including review of all development applications by Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements have been satisfied for this application. 2. Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) is met because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies, and Community Development Code requirements to the review of the proposal. 3. Goal #9 (Economy of the State) is satisfied, although the proposal would reduce the City's inventory of developable commercial land, because l) the reduction of C-P zoned land proposed is not a large amount compared to the total amount of developable C-P zoned land in the immediate area and the Tigard Triangle area; and 2) allowing multi-family development near C-P and I-P zoned developable properties may provide an attractive mix of land uses thereby helping spur commercial and industrial development in the area. Other communities have shown that such a mix of land uses can successfully co-exist without adversely affecting commercial or industrial growth. The applicants have pointed to the neighboring Kruse Way area of Lake Oswego where such a mixture of land uses exists. 4. Goal #10 (Housing) is satisfied because the proposal will provide for additional housing opportunities as promoted by the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660, Division 7). Approval of the proposal would increase housing opportunities on the City's developable residential lands by a total of 125 dwelling units. Approval would also provide increased opportunities for multi-family development. The Metropolitan Housing Rule requires that the City maintain.a minimum housing opportunity rate for developable land of 10 units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for single family and multi-family housing. 5. Goal #12 (Transportation) and Goal #13 (Energy Conservation) would be satisfied through providing the opportunity for an intensive land use near major transportation corridors (Highway 217 and I-5) as well as near employment centers. This promotes efficient use of the transportation system thereby promoting energy conservation. I The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 4 applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because Neighborhood Planning Organization #5 and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the proposal. In addition, the applicants have met with the immediate neighbors of the site to present their proposal in advance of the public hearings. 2. Plan Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the proposal would provide the opportunity for additional multi-family development and would increase the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. This is detailed in the discussion for Statewide Planning Goal 10 above and the attached memo regarding the effect of both current plan/zone amendment proposals on the City's compliance with the Metropolitan Housing Rule. 3. Plan policies 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 will be satisfied because the proposal would allow for development of the properties in ways that may be more compatible with adjacent established low density residential areas than the currently permitted uses of the C-P zone would be. Future residential development of the parcels will be subject to density transition limitations within 100 feet of the Low Density Residential Plan designated areas to the north and west of the site. These t limitations would tend to lessen impacts on adjacent properties to a greater extent than Code requirements applicable to development proposals under the current Plan and zone designations. Both the existing C-P zoning designation and the proposed R-25 zoning designation allow a maximum building height of 45 feet. The C-P zone requires 20 foot side yard and rear yard setbacks from residential zones and thus under the current zoning designation, a 45 foot tall building could be constructed within 20 feet of the abutting developed residential parcels. Because the density transition requirements of Policy 6.3.2(a) and Community Development Code Section 18.40.040(A) would apply if the properties were zoned R-25, it is unlikely that multi-family residential buildings taller than two stories tall would be built within 100 feet of the properties' boundaries with adjacent developed residential parcels - much less within 20 feet of those properties. The applicants, conceptual site plan illustrates how development of the site might occur in light of the density transfer requirements. While the housing types allowed in the adjacent R-3.5 zone and the R-2.5 zone proposed for this site may be substantially different, the density transition requirements along with Code requirements regarding landscaping and buffering can be used to make the differing housing types compatible. 4.. Plan Policy 6.5.1 will be satisfied through review of a development proposal for the site through the Site Development Review and building permit review processes to assure that developments on the site will not create nuisances and that all buildings will comply with the Uniform Building Code. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 5 5. Plan Policy 6.6.1 will be satisfied through the imposition of buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code to any future development proposal for the properties. i 6. Plan Policies 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, and 7.6.1 are satisfied because adequate public service capacities are available to serve potential development on the properties. k i 7. Plan Policy 7.8.1 is satisfied because the Tigard School District was informed of this proposal. The School District has not commented that the proposed addition of housing opportunities within the District would cause exceeded capacities in the District's schools. The School District has been making plans for increased school capacity through several preliminary school construction and expansion proposals for which funding has been approved through the recent school funding tax levy request. f f 8. Plan Policy 8.1.1 commits the City to plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future development. This policy would be satisfied because s development resulting from the proposed redesignation of these parcels would tend to reduce the anticipated traffic onto SW 72nd Avenue and other nearby streets as compared to development under the current f zoning. SW 72nd Avenue is a major collector street developed with f primarily commercial and industrial uses and with good connections to several arterials. Although residential use of the site would be anticipated to generate more nighttime and weekend traffic than most of the permitted uses in the current C-P zone, that traffic would be expected to be on SW 72nd Avenue and not on local streets in the i adjacent residential neighborhood. The Engineering Division will review any future development proposal for the property and may require improvements to affected public streets to reduce impacts resulting from future developments. 9. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a condition of approval of any future development of the properties. Necessary street improvements would be required at the time of development. The City's Engineering Division will review any future development proposals for the properties. 10. Plan Policy 8.2.2 is satisfied because Tri-Met offers bus service on SW 72nd Avenue on which the parcels have frontage. Therefore, the proposed redesignation would locate an intensive type of development within close proximity to an existing public transit route. 11. Plan Policy 9.1.2 is satisfied because the proposed redesignation would provide the opportunity for high density residential development in proximity to transit routes, major highways, and employment centers thereby promoting efficient use of the transportation system and reduced energy consumption. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 6 F i 12. The Locational Criteria specified in Chapter 12 of the Plan for E Medium-High Density Residential use are satisfied for the following reasons: a. The subject properties are not committed to low density development. b. Density transition, buffering, and screening requirements of the Community Development Code may be used to help make future development on the subject properties compatible with neighboring low density single family residences to the north and west. C. The subject parcels have direct access to SW 72nd Avenue, a- major collector street, and are in close proximity to Highway 217 and I-5, both which are functionally classified as arterials. d. Serious development-limitations affecting the properties, such as steep slopes or poor drainage, are not evident. Essential public facilities are present to serve future development on the properties and have sufficient capacity to serve any increase in demand caused by development of the site. e. Public transit is available on SW 72nd Avenue in front of the A site. f. The properties are located within one quarter mile of a business and office center across SW 72nd Avenue from the site. The site is also relatively close to the under-developed Tigard Triangle area which is anticipated to be a major employment center in the future. The applicants point out that there are few multi- family housing opportunities, developed or undeveloped, within' Close proximity to this future major employment center. Development of additional housing near the Triangle may result in reduced needs for automobile commuting between home and work. The applicants point to the successes of the Kruse way corridor i to the east as an example for the Triangle area of a successful mix of new, high quality office development, mixed density residential development; and limited retail development. Although the site is some distance from convenience retail services at this time, it is quite possible that convenience retail uses may become available as adjacent properties and the Triangle are developed. E g. The applicants anticipate that private open space as well as recreational facilities will be provided as part of development of the site. In order to approve a quasi-judicial amendment to the Plan and zoning maps, the City must also find that there is evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community which affects the subject parcel. Alternatively, the City must find that there has been a mistake or inconsistency made in STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 7 the original designation of the parcel (Comprehensive Plan, Volume 2,Policy 1.1.1, Implementation Strategy 2; Community Development Code Section 18.22.040(A)). The applicants assert that a change in circumstances has occurred in that there is now a significant demand for housing opportunities within close proximity to employment centers. This sort of demand was not as evident just a few years ago. Substantial recent growth in the region has led to increased traffic congestion and increased commuting times. Proximity to one's place of employment is now a major factor in deciding where to call home. The housing industry has responded by developing all densities of housing close to employment centers. The applicants point to the neighboring Kruse Way area as an example of such a mixed use, mixed residential density area that has developed in recent years. Opportunities within the City of Tigard within one mile of the Triangle area for developing any type of housing, especially multi-family housing, are extremely limited except for multi-family development above the first floor in mixed use developments within the Triangle. The Planning Division staff concurs with the applicants' assessment of the increased demand for housing opportunities near employment centers. Our assessment is based not only on our discussions with potential developers but also on discussions with potential residents of the City looking to live-nearby their places of employment and with current residents who are concerned with their increased commute times. We also have noticed an increase in mixed use developments and less strict segregation of land uses in other cities. Primarily because such mixtures of uses can result in decreased traffic and fuel consumption, staff supports integration of land uses where it is possible for the uses to harmoniously co-exist through proper site planning. Staff also believes that a mistake in the original Plan designation for this site in-particular as well as mistakes in the Plan Map city-wide exist that the proposed action can help to rectify. It is difficult to assert that a mistake was made in the Professional/Commercial designation of this particular site in 1983 because of the extensive discussions and deliberations regarding this site that occurred at that time. Nevertheless, we believe that the mistake that was made here, and in other locations throughout the city, was that not enough attention was paid to the need for multiple family residential opportunities at locations such as this that are near major employment centers, near commercial centers, near major highway corridors, and near public transit corridors. By locating higher density residential opportunities near employment/commercial centers and with respect to transportation opportunities, reduced dependence on automobile transportation could have been promoted and some of Tigard's present traffic congestion could have been avoided with positive impacts for the entire city. Instead, the current Plan Map designates the majority of areas available for new multiple family residential development far from employment and commercial centers. The primary areas that are designated for multi-family housing opportunities are at the far western and southwestern edges of the city. The City Council and Planning Commission are well aware.of the difficulties that have arisen as these areas have STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 8 developed and as rapid growth has hit the city in general. A common complaint in recent years has been the great increase in traffic in the newly developing areas and in developed areas through which the new residents must pass in their travels to I-5, Highway 217, and local employment and commercial centers. Providing multi-family housing opportunities nearer the Triangle, the SW 72nd Avenue Corridor, Washington Square/Lincoln Center, the central business district, and near I-5 and Highway 217 can help correct the mistakes of current Plan designations and minimize future traffic congestion. We therefore find that the current designation of this site can be categorized as a mistake in that it represents a lost opportunity to serve the city as a whole through locating multi-family housing opportunities close to typical traffic attractors. Such a redirection will require difficult decisions regarding existing neighborhoods, such as the Rolling Hills neighborhood, but we believe that the density transition requirements of the Community Development code and careful site selection and site plan scrutiny can be utilized to afford compatibility between housing developments of differing intensities. We .find that the subject site is ideally located with regard to the Plan's locational criteria for multiple family residential opportunities, especially with respect to proximity to employment centers and highway and transit access. We.. also find that the applicants' conceptual site plan illustrates haw the density transition requirement and careful site planning could make high density residential use of this site largely compatible with the adjacent low density residential development. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings and conclusions listed above, the Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation for approval of CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 for the subject properties to Medium-High Density Residential and R-25. Evly j la"U II&A PREP BYYAsV,eant effer RO Y: Re h Liden Planner Senior Planner br/CPA8907.J0 STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07 (Criterion Equities) - PAGE 9 MEMORANDUM t~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Commission DATE: October 3, 1989 FROM: Jerry Offer and Deborah Stuart Assistant Planners SUBJECT: Metro Housing Rule Compliance The Metropolitan Housing Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule 660, Division 7) requires that the average density allowed for all developable residential land within the City's original planning area be a minimum of ten dwelling units per acre. Two plan amendment proposals before you tonight could affect the City's overall housing opportunity index or allowable density on lands that are classified by the Plan as buildable residential lands. The City's Plan, as acknowledged by LCDC in 1984, inventoried 1,311 acres of developable residential land in the City. Zoning at that time provided for a housing opportunity of 13,110 units, just meeting the Metropolitan Housing Rule standard. Since that time, eight Plan amendments have been approved which have affected the inventory. Those redesignations provide a current inventory of 1,290 acres and a housing opportunity for 13,112 units (10.16 units per acre). The two proposals before the Commission will have somewhat counter effects on the amount of developable residential acreage and the housing opportunity index. The Gross proposal (CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08) would reduce the amount of developable residential land by approximately 2 acres and the housing opportunity index by 47 units. The Criterion Equities proposal (CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07) would increase the amount of developable land by approximately 5 acres and the City's housing opportunity index by 125 units. The effect of these proposals, singly and jointly, on the developable lands inventory and the housing opportunity index is displayed below. 1. Approval of Gross proposal Developable acres - 1,288 acres Potential dwelling units - 13,065 units Housing opportunity index - 10.14 2. Approval of Criterion Equities proposal Developable acres - 1,295 Potential dwelling unit - 13237 dwelling units Housing opportunity index - 10.22 3. Approval of both proposals Developable acres - 1,293 acres Potential Dwelling units - 13,190 dwelling units Housing opportunity index - 10.20 units/acre TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 3, 1989 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, I r Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Castile, Fyre, Leverett, Rosborough, and Saporta. i Absent: Commissioners Barber, and Peterson. Staff: Assistant Planner Jerry Offer (left 10:00 PM); Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart; Planning t Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded to approve j' the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners E present. Commissioner Saporta abstained. i E i 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION 44 t o President Moen announced that Agenda Item S.3, an appeal from NPO 3. regarding manufactured homes, is being postponed to the October 17th Planning Commission hearing. i i 5. PUBLIC EOARrNGS t i S.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-07 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-07 METZGER-EMS/ROCRWE L NPO #5 A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Commercial Professional) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). ZONE: C-P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: West side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varna Street and SW Fir Street (WCTM 2S1 1DB, tax lots 800 & 801, 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600) Assistant Planner Jerry Offer reviewed the proposal and staff's reasons for recommending approval. Discussion followed regarding maximum building heights of the existing and proposed zones and the density transition required between a R-3.5 and R-25 zone. Also discussed was why i the staff was recommending approval of the R-25 rather than the R-12 zone. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION • Y o Mark Rockwell, Criterion Equities, 1800 One Main Place, 101 SW Main St., R Portland, OR 97204, reviewed the existing condition of the property and uses which would be permitted under the existing C-P zoning. He reviewed F reasons for and the need for the proposed change from C-P to Residential and why R-25 versus R-12 would be better suited for the property. C PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 1 f o Ralph Tahran, OTAK Architects, 17355 SW Boones Ferry Road, Lake Oswego, OR 97035, explained that this proposal would minimize exposure to the single family residential area and is not designed to the maximum density which t would be permitted. He compared design and site development review j standards between the C-P and R-25 zone. He stated that the traffic from an R-25 development would have less conflict during peak times than C-P traffic and that they are willing to commit to the design concept that 4 they are proposing. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Craig Hopkins, NPO # 5 Chairperson, stated that the NPO was impressed with the proposal. However, they are 'supporting the neighborhood in their ' opposition to the proposal. They feel that the Comprehensive Plan F provides for orderly development of the area and that the C-P zoning should be maintained. f 1 o Jack Stiger, Steiger Enterprises, Inc., 10250 SW Greenburg Road, Tigard' OR. 97223, stated he has shown the site several times and feels that the site is better suited for a high quality, high density residential use. o Gordon King, 4214 SW 51st Place, Portland, Or 97221, Commercial Realtor for Cushman Wakefield stated he had passed on listing this site as it is inappropriate for commercial professional use and would be better suited to high density residential. s o Dale Roseman, 13355 SW 76th, Tigard, OR., 97223, lives 200 feet from the west end of the project. He supports staff's recommendation for approval. He felt it would increase the value of property and enhance the area for future development. o Raymond Ems, 13440 SW 76th, Tigard, OR. 97223, had owned the majority of the land that is now the Rolling Hills Subdivision. He felt the proposal would clean up the area, that there is a high demand for residences in this area, and that there are probably 500 jobs available within a five minute walking distance from the proposal. o David Metzger, Rt. 4 Box 267C, Sherwood, OR., representing his mother who owns the property, stated that the property has been listed for 9 years and they have been told repeatedly that this is a poor site for office use. He added that a large number of offices across the street have remained vacant. They have had several offers for the front half of their property which would leave the back half, which abuts the residential r area, with a structure that would"be constructed of less quality than the multi-family structures proposed. G o James Powell, 7660 SW Fir, Tigard, OR., lives two to three houses away. He was concerned that it had been decided in 83/84 how the site would develop and that now there is a change in thinking, and the developer wants to change the use. He was opposed to the change in principle. Discussion followed regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 1989 - PAGE 2 r. o Bob Sudlow, 7530 SW Varns, Tigard, OR. 97223, supported the proposal. He would prefer single family residential but realizes that is not practical. He stated there has been no growth under the current circumstances and felt the proposal would increase property values. Currently the residential area is an island and if the site is developed as commercial professional it will further fragment the residential island. f o Staff submitted letters of support from Leonard Ludwig, First Portland Leasing Corp.; John Decosta, Professionals 100; Jim and Nancy Wryn; and Wallace Harding, Harding Fletcher Company. o Bruce MacKay, 7430 SW Cherry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, abuts the south boundary of the property. He had investigated the zoning at the time of purchase and had made his decision to buy on the basis that the abutting property would develop as commercial profe-bsional and opposed changing the zone to multi-family. o Jerry Howe, 13280 SW 76th, Tigard, OR. 97223, lives adjacent to the proposal and had purchased his home a year and a half ago because of the large lots and low traffic. He felt if the site is developed as commercial professional, the traffic would end after 5:00 pm. If the site developes as multi-family, he felt traffic would occur at all hours, that higher crime rate would result, and that the multi-family area would not be maintained to the neighborhood's standards. He questioned how many S times will they have to face rezoning issues? o Ray Piricl, 7745 SW Varns, Tigard, OR. 97223, neither favors or opposes the request. He stated that this site had been a major issue during the Comprehensive Plan process, originally it was zoned I-P and as a comprise was zoned C-P. He added that the Rolling Hills Subdivision is a special case and the City had made a commitment to protect the subdivision and he felt the City should honor that commitment. o Earla Guerra, 7670 SW Cherry Drive, Tigard, OR. 97223, was concerned what would happen to other adjacent vacant land if this site is allowed to change to high density residential. She opposed the change. o Joanne Bieker, 7730 SW Cherry, Tigard, OR. 97223, requested that the property remain C-P. She did not feel the City had taken care of problems such as the apartments to the north of the subdivision. o Millie Cox, 13320 SW 76th Ave., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated they had purchased their property two and a half years ago knowing that they f abutted C-P zoning. They would not have purchased if the property had been zoned for multi-family. She stated the subdivision has approximately 65 quiet, large, well kept lots and that the proposal would more than double the population. She was also concerned that property value would f' go down. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 3 ~ f r i e F o Ron Katon, 13395 SW 72nd Ave., Tigard, OR 97223, resident for 18 years was concerned about what effect the proposed exit/entrance would have on his road. His other concerns were that crime would increase, evening and t weekend noise would increase, population would triple, and what would f happen to the other vacant eight acres to the south which are in close proximity to this site along Fir Street. f E o Sharon Takahashi, 7610 SW Cherry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated she has been a member of NPO # 5 since 1981 and they have had to protect the neighborhood against Tech Center, Hillside/Hunziker, and the batch plant. She did not feel that there was an error in the plan and if there is a f need for additional multi-family that the Tigard Triangle should be evaluated for that use. I o Ed Gordon 7475 SW Cherry Dr., Tigard, OR. 97223, stated h: owns f apartments and has concerns for the problems that high density living creates such as traffic at all hours. He opposed the change. o Dennis Worznick, 7495 SW Cherry, Tigard, OR. 97223, opposed the request. He felt that lack of housing should be put in the Tigard Triangle. He was concerned that adjacent vacant property would be changed to R-25 if this proposal is approved. i i o Jim Jackson, 7380 SW Varns, Tigard, Or. 97223, located on the north side of the project likes the look of the project, however, has concerns regarding crime, noise, and air quality from fireplaces. } o Greg Weber, 7425 SW Varns, Tigard, OR. 97223, opposed the request. He was concerned about air pollution and traffic. x C o Tom Brian, 7630 SW Fir, Tigard, OR. 97223, nearby, not adjacent, did not feel a substantial change had been made to justify the change and that market changes come and go. Many owners had purchased homes based upon the existing zoning and he felt the Comprehensive Plan should be relied upon. He noted that the criteria is the same for R-25 zone as it is for the C-P zone, that the City is in compliance with the housing goal, that additional residential uses (R-40) are allowed in the Tigard Triangle above the first floor, and that if housing is targeted in the wrong area this should be addressed during periodic review. He added that a neighborhood meeting had voted 30 to 3 to keep the C-P zone and that economic circumstances should not be balanced on the backs of this neighborhood. He requested denial. However, if the Commission chose to recommend approval he suggested that the applicant be required to sit down with the neighborhood and come up with some restrictive covenants. REBUTTAL f o Mark Rockwell stated that the applicants are willing to commit to restrictive covenants. He felt that the reason the neighbors are happy with the C-P zoning is because of the vacant site they have not been exposed to the uses which would be permitted, several of which would not end at 5:00 pm. In addition, they could have a 45 foot tall concrete PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 4 building 20 feet from their property line. He felt 9 years was a long time to ask a property owner to be patient. Also, that traffic would be 50% less than a commercial development and would not penetrate the neighborhood. He felt that the concerns for increased crime are unfounded and that even homes in the Rolling Hills Subdivision have been allowed to run down; that the $50,000 units they proposed would not denigrate but would enhance the area and increase home values. He did not feel the R-40 density allowed above the first floor in the Triangle was a serious zone as it has not even been able to work downtown Portland. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Leverett favored the request. o Commissioner Rosborough felt that this was a high quality proposal. However, he was unsure whether the criteria had been met. He did not feel a mistake had been made. o Commissioner Castile was impressed with the design, however, he felt the C-P zone should be preserved. o Commissioner Pyre felt that this is a good development; however, there are no guarantees that this is the project that would be constructed. He did not feel that the criteria had been met for a change. He felt that perhaps the entire area should be looked at for a change to multi-family. o Commissioner Saporta did not feel the criteria had been met. o President Moen-was concerned that the criteria had not been met to warrant a change. He had a problems with abutting R-25 and R-3.5 zones. He felt that density transition and buffering help, however Rolling Hills is unique and the city did make a commitment to protect the subdivision. o Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Castile seconded to forward CPA 89-07 and ZC 89-07 to City Council with a recommendation for denial based on the finding that the proposal did not meet the criteria to allow a change in the Comprehensive Plan. l 1 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-08 ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-08 GROSS NPO #7 A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium-High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and a Zone Change from R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre)" to C-N (Commercial, Neighborhood). ZONE: R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th Avenue. (WCTM 1S1 33CA, Tax Lot 100) Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart reviewed the proposal, the proposed road improvements, and made staff's recommendation for denial. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 5 PROFESSIONALS 100, INC., REALTORS@ t Mr. Jerry Offer Community Development Department City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Ammendment and Zone Change for 13265 S.W. 72nd. Avenue; 2S1 1DB, tax lots 800 S ! 801, a portion of 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600) Dear Mr. Offer: " Based on my experience in marketing the property, there are several reasons why I recommend approval of the proposed i Comprehensive Plan Ammendment. First, the site is not large enough to accommodate C-P projects of substantial scope and quality. Second, the I. site is disproportionately deep in relationship to its width and frontage on S.W. 72nd. This eliminates most C-P developments as greater width and visibility are nearly always important requirements. These limitations result in two small sites. One on the front that is 2-2.5 acres, and the balance of the property in the back making up a second "landlocked" site of a similar size. If the current zoning is maintained, I fully expect the property will be divided into two parcels as we have had interest from various individuals to purchase the front portion to build a small office or commercial building. That leaves the "landlocked" back half of the property undeveloped and with relatively little value. Given these circumstances, I would not anticipate that the development on the property will be of high quality, particularly on the back half. However, if the Comprehensive Plan amendment and zone change are made, the opposite is true. The size, shape, and f. location of the property are excellent for accommodating a f; high quality multi-family development. Furthermore, the change would help to adjust a significant imbalance in available land. At present there is a large supply of undeveloped C-P land yet there is no R-25 land available in or near the Tigard Triangle. ` Sincerely, Cohn Decosta Lake Oswego Branch • "Kruse Woods One" 5285 S.W. Meadows Rd., Suite 161, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • (503) 636-4545 ' Mn. and 'Mu. Jame, H. W&yn OC i U? 1989 7570 S.W. Che/rAy vn.ive ~y T.igand, Oregon 97223 6mt ~1`ommunitq Dzretopmezt T.igand oi;tt City HaZZ Tig.ahd, Oregon Regahding: Zone change son Rotting Hit X-6 Eztatez VeaA Councib, FAiend and Newghboxs, We aae hoAAy we eoutd not be here tonight in peuon, but we woubd tike to .tend ouA suppoht in avon os the zone change. We seeb there woubd be beautisub wet kept apoAtment,s. Beautisut tand6cap.ing and wetZ maintained. The bui bde" have o s sexed to give u6 this a s s uA.anee in wining. They would be mane atuutive than a steAibe o55.iee building, and we have no cu mane that an oss.ice buitd.ing wi,et be built there. It coubd be any number os us.inezzes. It eoutd be a day cane centeA, with say a hundred patients coming and going twice a day at peak .tJra.ss.ic houtus. It could be and E U on Moose Lodge bui.Ct there with many might time activities going on. There aAe empty o66.ice6 a.P,.b oven T.igand, Who would want to bu td another o55.ice buibding to stand vacant. Take a wabk abound your neighborhood and Zook at the empty oss.ieeb son gent. Tnass.ie--we are doomed to have move tnass.ic, no matter what iz bunt ,there. We think it wou bd be better to have move earls than 18 wheebeAz making and pick- ing up deb.iv ere,i e.6 snom a busine,6s on wu4ehoua e. These apa ttment dweb be&A arse not alb going to be pourui.ng out onto 72nd street at 7:45 A.M. each monn.i.ng, they wieb be coming and going 1u6t as you and I do, at vaAiou,6 hours. We seee you would be betteA oss with these nice apart ment6 bi.hi.nd you than what we have. We know what it is tike to be awakened in the night by someone pound= ing ; et eE on dnopp i.ng g. ".6 in the dump6teA, on .tau ck6 .idt i ng ha t6 the night, wasting son a pickup. Believe me you don't want that. We think most os the %e6.i.dent6 os Rotting H-(. tb would tike to bee th.i6 .band remain as it iz, but with -band in such bhojrt suppQy, it can not be. Someone iz going to buitd something on this .band and we wou?.d nathen see it be a 6eautl.6ul developement than a pig .in,a poke. We have enough ugly on 72nd, .bet's have some pretty son a change. kd ad6 cy tunyn~ !e/e3/tSy by: se 4n 5b6 'L3y 'to i s HAKU I NG fL6TCH6& CITY Ue T l GAtW !Q~ 00Z MORIGAGE BANKERS E'V ANp REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS October 3. 1989 Mr. Jerry Offer Community Development Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard. Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Residential R-25 13260 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. Offer: For the past 28 years. I have been involved in financing a wide assortment of real estate developments throughout Portland and the State of Oregon. My background includes reviewing prospec- tive development.sites and assessing proposed projects' financial feasibility. This year we anticipate Harding Fletcher will finance over 100 million dollars in real estate, much of which is in the Portland area. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change repre- sent a very positive opportunity for the immediate neighborhood and the community at large. The site in quesLlun lx not well suited for C-P development. it has relatively little frontage in comparison to its overall depth. The C-P zone also permits a wide assortment of uses (many of which would not be desirable neighbors to the adjoining homes) to place varied types of buildings up to a minimum of only-20' from the adjacent residential lots.. It is unlikely the property will be developed as a ,quality office location. The orrice buildings on the east side of SW 72nd Avenue have not been as financially successful as had been originally anLlclpaled. ReuLal rates continue to be below the overall office market, and vacancies are high. Re-zoning the property to k-25 accomplishes several L'hings: 1. The site is the correct size, shape and location for a financially successful multi-family development. 2. Tigard has very little multi-family land available in C that area of town and the zone change would respond to that need. Uoyd Center Tower • Suite 1050.825 N.E. Multnomah • Portland. OR 97232 - Phone (503) 235.4328 • FAX (503) 239.7513 LV/VJ/VA V.J•JL VJVJ L.I.7 1:/LJ JJAJW IIV • l.L.•vll•.a♦ .l • • a • a~a saw vv..., Mr. Jerry offer Oulubuc, 3. 1989 E Page 2 E 3. A multi-family residential project is more compatible with the adjoining single family development. It would act as a buffer between the homes and the more intense t. commercial and industrial uses and thus serve to rein- force and preserve the Rolling Hills neighborhood. i I strongly encourage the City of Tigard to adopt the proposed { Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zone Change from C-Y to H-25. i ours very ruly F k~ 494 L~ Wallace E. Harding, CMB " President WEHijg t i. ' i s` r v NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION HS After a brief introduction to Tigard's new police chief, Ron Goodpaster, our NPO adjourned to the city hall conference room to deal with the night's agenda. Present were Chair Craig Hopkins, Orm Doty, Wendy Hawley, Wayne MacKinnon, Larry Schmidt and Sharon Takahashi. Guests this evening were Dick Bauer and Martha Bishop. The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. and the minutes of the previous meeting were approved as submitted. Unfinished business: 1. The question of the congestion and confusing lane markings on the 72nd Avenue overpass has had attention drawn to it and a letter has been sent to the Regional Highway Board. 2. The speed on Hall from Hunziker to Durham has also been similarly addressed. New business: *8: SDR 89-22/V89-28: This item was moved up in the agenda to accommodate Mr. Bauer, a principal in the issue, and Mr. Schmidt. Schmidt's Sanitary Service is seeking to expand and relocate a nonconforming sanitary service business. A new truck barn and areas to place recycling bins and containers away from the adjacent residential property are planned. Fuel tanks are to be removed or decommissioned by Oct. of 1990 and new fencing will be added. A second driveway will be added to access property on west side of house. This plan was an amicable solution to both Mr. Bauer and Mr. Schmidt. 1: HOP 89-33: Sunset Wall Covering. Michael Lehman of 7925 SW Ashford. No objection voiced. 2. SDR Appeal of Coiling Firs at Durham Road. Information only. Final appeal denied. 4. S 89-07: Bristol/McMonagle proposal to divide 2.48 acre parcel into 13 lots. No objection seen as it is allowable use and development. 5. SDR 89-16/V 89-23: Edwards/Castile proposal for commercial landscape construction and nursery business. Has been granted by the planning commission. 6. SDR 89-19: Pactrust Buildings 218 and 220 in Oregon Business Park III. No objection. 7. SDR 89-19: Two buildings in Pacific Corporate Center. No objection. 9: CPA 89-07/cc 89-07: Metzger-Ems/Rockwell. Request for a comp plan amendment and cone change to allow 110 apartment units on 72nd Avenue, between Varns and Fir. The membership of the NPO had no strong feelings on the proposal but urged the residents of the-area to attend the informational meeting to be help at Phil Lewis School on Sept. 27, at 7:30 p.m. At that time they will be able to ask questions and voice their { opinions on the project. I=,"-Y IPCUTUAN® UEASINC CCUU. FORMERLY CHARTER EQUIPMENT LEASING CORP. OF THE NORTHWEST September 29, 1989 Mr. Jerry Offer Community Development Department City of Tigard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 13265 S.W. 72nd. Avenue; 2S1 1DB,(tax lots 800 & 801, a por- tion of 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600) Dear Mr. Offer: Since I am unable to attend the public hearing on Tuesday, October 3rd, I am writing you this letter. As a property owner on south- west Varns street, I want to express my strong support for the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and zone change. As you are aware, in addition to the large employment base already located in this area, Tigard has plans that call for developing - thousands of new jobs within the Tigard Triangle as well as a large number for the southern end of S.W. 72nd. However, to my knowledge, there are no provisions in place to provide for any new multi-family housing within the triangle and there is very little inventory of multi-family land in the east and northeast portions of Tigard, and that is particularly true of land designated R-25. The proposed change is a step in the right direction. It's a mis- take to plan for thousands of new jobs and not accommodate the ob- vious need for additional multi-family housing. Sincerely, Leonard Ludwig,:- President LL:dab O CT 0 21989 7145 S.W. Varns Street a Portland, Oregon 97223-8057 • (503) 684-3417 Fax: (503) 684-0087 J A REQUST FOR A I PLAN AMENDMENT i - AND ZONE CHANGE - FROM COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL (C-P) 1 TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (R-25) RESIDENTIAL i I - C Prepared for: CRITERION EQUITIES 1800 One Main Place 101 SW Main Street Portland, OR 97204 I- ` Prepared by: - OTAK ARCHITECTS, P.C. 17355 S.W. Boones Ferry Road Lake Oswego, OR 97035 I.' August 14, 1989 I.- I- - - i PROPOSED: A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Commercial Professional (C-P) to Medium-High Density (R-25) - Residential. i LOCATION: A 5.03 acre parcel of land fronting on the west side of SW 72nd Avenue between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street. I s, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax lots 800, 801, 251, 1DB and a 16.5 foot wide strip of the northerly i portion of tax lot 3600, 2S 1, 1DC., Tigard, Oregon. Total area: 5.03 Acres. I. I • • 1 1 INTRODUCTION This application is to seek an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan to change a 5.03 acre Commercial Professional parcel to Medium-High Density (R-25) Residential. In the Comprehensive Plan Policies, the Commercial Professional Zone and the Medium-High Density (R-25) Residential Zone must meet the same locational criteria, to suggest that the land uses are somewhat interchangeable. We believe that a change in circumstances has occurred since the original designation on the Comprehensive Plan and the remainder of this narrative will serve as the supporting documentation. The Tigard Triangle area is developing as a high quality business center much like the Kruse Way Corridor to the east of the site. The Kruse Way Corridor has an added dimension to this business center concept, by providing a mix of housing types so the public can live close to their employment. A similar situation is possible in the Tigard Triangle but there is a shortage of sites that would be available to develop high quality multi-family in close proximity to the business centers. The subject site does not have the size or site configuration necessary to develop as a business park or office park to effectively compete as a viable commercial use. It also appears as though a commercial use would intrude more into the residential area just by the nature of its design requirements. A multi-family project must meet more strict design requirements and screening and buffering to fit into the site more positively. We have designed for this amendment proposal a suitable residentially scaled attractive project that proposes significant screening, setbacks and buffers from the existing residences. The multi-family market remains extremely strong and, in this case, provides a housing choice that is not available at this time to complement the Tigard Triangle. f z SITE DESCRIPTION f I The site is an approximately 5.03 acre relatively flat parcel of land gently sloping from west to the eastern boundary. The property fronts on a major collector, SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Single-family development abuts the site on the northern and western boundary. Across SW 72nd to the east is a business park. A nice collection of mature trees exist along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage and will remain with the proposed project. The site is a rectangular shape that goes deeply into the residential area and has all public t facilities available. r I i 2 1. 1 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES PLAN POLICY 1.1.2 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY change is consistent with Plan Policies and change in circumstances affecting parcel or neighborhood, or a mistake in original land use designation As will be discussed in great detail, this request for a change to Medium-High Density - Residential is consistent with all the applicable Plan Policies and locational criteria for Medium-High Density Residential designation. Changes in circumstances have taken place affecting this parcel, neighborhood, metropolitan housing policies and the preference the public has indicated in the past few years to live j closer to their places of employment. As the Tigard Triangle area continues to develop, a pattern much like the Kruse Way area is resulting, an area of high quality development on major transportation corridors where people can work in the office and business centers and have a choice of quality housing opportunities, mixes of single-family and multi-family; in effect, a mixed use development on a broader scale. The subject parcel meets all the locational criteria outlined in the Comprehensive Plan for a Medium-High Density Residential Zone designation. Development of nearby business centers and the absence of high quality multi-family housing in the immediate area make this an ideal site to provide housing for the continuing development of the business and office parks. Metropolitan housing policies have caused a change in circumstances since the original adoption of Comprehensive Plans, increasing housing density requirements on communities to approximately 10 units per acre, up from an original mandate of approximately 8 units per acre. Recent decisions by Metro to limit extending the Urban Growth Boundary changes the circumstances to continue to develop more intensely. These recent policies, Metro wide, along with the continuing demand for multi-family housing and the public's increasing desire l to live closer to where they work to minimize commute time and increase leisure time make l this an attractive, ideally located Medium-High Density Residential site. PLAN POLICY 2.1.1 NEIGHBORHOOD REVIEW OF PROPOSAL For a comprehensive review of our proposal by the neighborhood, we will implement all the strategies outlined in the Plan Policies. We will inform. and meet with the appropriate Neighborhood Planning Organization up until the scheduled hearing date. The Plan Amendment process assures that affected owners are notified. The City also assists the process in providing meeting areas in City Hall. I- I- 3 I " 1 PLAN POLICY 6.1.1 INCREASED HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES The policy is satisfied by offering housing development to occur, to the greatest extent possible, on designated buildable lands in areas where public facilities and services can be readily extended to those lands. All services are available to this site and the proposed design preserves the trees and character along the 72nd Avenue frontage to the maximum extent. The proposal would provide for additional multi-family development and would increase the net housing opportunity on buildable lands in the City. The City is obligated through the Metropolitan Housing Rule to provide for an equal housing opportunity mix of single-family and multi-family units with an overall development density of 10 units per acre. This redesignation request would further the City's compliance with these requirements. PLAN POLICIES 6.3.2 AND 6,3.3 COMPATIBILITY WITH LOWER DENSITY ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL ZONE " These policies will be satisfied through strict buffering and screening criteria in the Community Development Code. The density within 100 feet of each property line abutting J residential will not exceed 25/0 over the density shown on the Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent land. The increased setbacks, density limitations and height restrictions will mandate a development more compatible with adjacent residential areas than the existing I zone designation of Commercial Professional. PLAN POLICY 6.6.1 BUFFERING AND SCREENING I This policy will be satisfied through the Design Review process. This proposal will be subject to more stringent buffering and screening requirements than the current allowed use of Commercial Professional. In general, we also intend to increase the buffer by placing garages against the property line areas abutting residential to form a solid secure buffer. I PLAN POLICIES 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.1 PUBLIC FACILITY AND SERVICE CAPABILITIES I The Policies are satisfied because adequate public service capacities are available to serve h ' development on the property. Sanitary sewer and water is available on SW 72nd Avenue. Site drainage will be directed to nearby storm sewers. A 2/3 street improvement on Fir Street will be required. Erosion control techniques will be included as part of the site development plan. PLAN POLICY 7.8.1 ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL SYSTEM The Tigard School District is being informed of this proposal. A new addition to the Durham Elementary School is nearly completed. It is our understanding that the School District is also reviewing proposed changes to school attendance boundaries to alleviate overcrowding in existing classrooms and to provide additional capacity to serve future growth. C 4 1 PLAN POLICY 8.1.1 SAFE AND EFFICIENT STREET SYSTEM AND PLAN POLICY 8. 1.3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The proposed development directly abuts SW 72nd Avenue a developed major collector street. Street right of way will be dedicated along SW 72nd Avenue and SW Fir Street. Our - development will construct a 2/3 street improvement on SW Fir Street to serve as access to our development, so that traffic from our development will not pass through existing neighborhoods. Tri-Met service is available abutting the site at SW 72nd Avenue. PLAN POLICY 8.2.2 LOCATING INTENSIVE LAND USE IN AREAS SERVED BY PUBLIC TRANSIT This policy is satisfied because Tri-Met offers bus service on SW 72nd Avenue, less than one quarter mile from the properties. The proposed redesignation would locate an intensive type of development on an existing public transit route to maximize use. PLAN POLICY 12.1.1 LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. FOR MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PLAN DESIGNATION The proposal is in complete agreement with the outlined locational criteria for Medium- High Density Residential use. 1. Density transition, buffering and screening requirements of the Community Development Code will assure that the development will be compatible with adjacent residences. f 2. The proposed development plan maximizes the privacy of the existing residential area. 3. The subject parcel fronts on and has direct access to SW 72nd Avenue, a major collector street. 4. The subject site is relatively flat, with sparse tree cover, and is fully serviced; so no development limitations exist. f 5. Tri-Met service is available on 72nd so public transit is available within one quarter mile. 6. A business center is located across SW 72nd from the site. Convenience retail service is also available nearby. Also relevant is the part increased housing opportunities will play in the development of the Tigard Triangle, an area that will provide a mix of uses; employment centers with complementing housing areas, much like the Kruse Way Corridor is developing to the east of the subject site. 7. The proposed development will provide its own open space and recreational facilities. i ( 5 I COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LCDC GOALS AND GUIDELINES GOAL 1 - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT This application follows the Plan Amendment process and the subsequent notification procedures required to insure the general public may become involved in the planning process. Additionally, neighborhood meetings will be held to present our proposal to the immediate area. GOAL 2 - LAND USE PLANNING By following the designated process and by providing a factual basis to support said change, this amendment conforms to said goal. GOAL 3 - AGRICULTURAL GOAL Not applicable. 1 GOAL 4 - FOREST LANDS Not applicable. GOAL 5 - OPEN SPACE SCENIC AND HISTORICAL AREAS AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1 Not applicable, except for open space requirements of the Medium-High Density (R-25) Residential Zone. I GOAL 6 - AIR., WATER AND LAND RESOURCE QUALITY The development would conform to all environmental quality statutes, rules and standards. GOAL 7 - AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS Not applicable. I _ GOAL 8 - RECREATIONAL NEEDS Not applicable. f GOAL 9 - ECONOMY OF STATE The subject project will provide jobs and services to residents of the State. Development of the site will have a positive influence on the tax base. I~ 6 1- lol- GOAL 10 - HOUSING . The proposal will provide for additional housing opportunities as promoted by the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Metropolitan Housing Rule. The Metropolitan Housing Rule requires that the City maintain a minimum housing opportunity rate for developable lands of 10 units per acre and a minimum 50/50 opportunity mix for single-family and multi- family housing. GOAL 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES Urban services exist on or in close proximity to the subject site. The proposed Plan Amendment would allow for the use of these facilities and services in an efficient and reasonable manner. GOAL 12 - TRANSPORTATION The proposed use would make efficient use of a major transportation corridor. GOAL 13 - ENERGY CONSERVATION Greater efficiency is achieved by placing increased intensity along high capacity I transportation corridors. GOAL 14 - URBANIZATION The site is within the Urban Growth Boundary. I . l 7 f l xy MAIN r~ J 98s•04 tes , toA g01 12,.De' t-- txs.4~ •a 710 •+t / tN° ',88As•• y" 46 tgox'~ 1 2y 4y 709 '60 S-`R-i xo. 1*'' _~'-Co;nd 12s•4y' 708 ' j~ t Yt~ S vi. 1„•4s 707 '0 7,9 r o 0 E S V `~i o 706 1^', • o 2~ a in °1° j 169 1189. 20, 58 27 o4, 1000 Z " 2 6 yl 11•i,, 118°e05'~ ~l . O l 125 a ~ 23 000 x 1100 2.38 A~: " ;54AC. 12.D0 .29 . IN x 2.40AC. c.1 ; r1 ~ SIR S'C. sE b 8g•tgE ~ ,V+ ~ , 2 • . •,t 5 140' " 13a •6~. •24 ~ yto ~ a 4201 ~i ~2j9T5 V"t Ito 00 to 90.),l 19o.12 • 1 p a 1 ` i' e 24 W 90AC'_ f i _ 1 .ynf ! 5641 O 69 li0 1626 3Kp2 ,A l _ r,-»'• t` 1 .Q/ / 3501 0 .47AC% r~ ' > 11~ W " 87 AC $to i o • to 40 vl% "O 292.90 1~3 I 200 Ac.. r•__ age 2~* r f .46 AC- " A ' ti~ Now I NORTH 217 1. 99W TIGARD PROJECT w SITE `w Q z N i i i t i t t , VICINITY MAP ot*c architects, P.C. 17355 SW. Boors Ferry Rd. Lake Osv.eyo.OR 97MS (503) 6315.3616 101 E em street vancotiva. WA 96660 (206) WS-OW u central Way 830S Kiattand. WA 98033 (206) E72-"46 I CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: October 10, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Comprehensive PREVIOUS ACTION:Plannin Commission idw Plan Amendment CPA 89-08 ZC fhearinc on 1013/89 89-08 Gross PREPARED BY: Deborah Stuart DEPT HEAD O CITY ADMIN OK%i ! REQUESTED BY: PO ICY ISSUE Should the City change the Comprehensive Plan to allow neighborhood commercial development at the southwest corner of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th Avenue? INFORMATION SUMMARY On Tuesday, October 3, 1989, the Tigard Planning Commission heard a request for a comprehensive plan amendment and zone change for a 1.87 acre parcel located at the northern end of SW 135th Avenue abutting SW Scholls Ferry Road on the west side of SW 135th Avenue. Staff recommended that this proposal be denied based on the comments of the state Highway Division, Washington County and the City of Beaverton which raised concerns pertaining to traffic and access to the property. The agencies noted that improvements to SW Scholls Ferry Road were not final and could potentially change thus affecting this parcel. Staff believed it would be wise to await completion of these state and county highway improvements and that a plan amendment and zone change might be premature at this time. NPO #7 is recommending against the zone change based on traffic impact, re- allocation of housing units and lack of need for an additional commercial zoning. The Planning Commission decided to deny the decision based on the fact that they believed there had been no mistake, inconsistency or change in circumstances in the plan. Attached are the staff report and a vicinity map, the applicant's statement and a copy of the Planning commission minutes. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Deny Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 as recommended by the Planning Commission and staff and direct staff to prepare a final order. 2. Approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 and direct staff to prepare a final order. FISCAL IMPACT None SUGGESTED ACTION Deny Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change CPA 89-08/2C 89-08 as recommended by the Planning Commission and staff and direct staff to prepare a final order. r~ STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 OCTOBER 3, 1989 TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON i t i. A. FACTS 1. General Information l CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 j ; REQUEST: A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from E Medium High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and a Zone Change from R-25 (Multi-family Residential, 25 units/acre) to C-N (Neighborhood Commercial). Zone: R-25 (Multi-family Residential, 25 units/acre). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-High Density Residential ~p ZONING DESIGNATION: R-25 APPLICANT: E. Aleen Gross OWNER: same 2955 SW Fairview Blvd. { Portland, OR 97201 I LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 33CA tax lot 100). 2. Vicinity Information The subject site is bordered by SW Scholls Ferry Road to the west, Old SW Scholls Ferry Road to the northwest and north, SW 135th Avenue to the east and a similarly zoned R-25 (Multi-family Residential, 25 units/acre) parcel, containing a single family residence, to the south. The area between new SW Scholls Ferry Road and.old SW Scholls Ferry Road to the west is within the City of Beaverton. The City of Beaverton also lies due north on the other side of SW Scholls Ferry Road. 3. Background Information The subject parcel was annexed to Tigard in June of 1983. No development activity has occurred on the subject site since annexation with the exception of the installation of a traffic signal at the northern portion STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 1 of the subject property. Therefore, no land use requests have been f reviewed by the Planning Division staff with respect to the subject property. 4. Site Information' t' The subject parcel involved in the proposed redesignation is approximately 1.87 acres in size and is largely covered by small deciduous and evergreen trees. The eastern half of the subject site was included in the SW 135th, Avenue Local Improvement District and so possesses half-street improvements. According to the applicant, the stated purpose of this redesignation is to facilitate construction of a small retail commercial neighborhood center which would subsequently require a City Site Development Review permit. A redesignation to C-N•would in no way limit the future development of this parcel strictly to this specific retail use. The Code provides for a pp variety of civic and commercial uses in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning f` district. F 4 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Tigard Water District, the Consolidated Rural Fire District and the City Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. (i The City Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and makes the following findings and observations: Development under C-N zoning is likely to generate approximately 4,000 vehicle trips per day to and from the site. Development under the 4 current R-25 -zoning would likely generate less than 300 trips per day. Thus, the proposed zoning would likely result in a substantial increase in the vehicles trips to and from the site. However, traffic impacts on adjoining streets away from the site would likely be rather minor. The types of businesses allowed under a C-N zoning tend to serve predominately the adjoining neighborhood and passing motorists. Of the 4,000 trips per day the majority are likely to be motorists who are p already passing by the site and stop briefly at the site; thus, these; trips would not represent new trips on Scholls Ferry Road.; A C-N type development would be expected to receive much of its business from the adjoining neighborhood. To the extent that the C-N zoning development provides a new business location for the neighborhood, it may actually represent a decrease in trips on Scholls Ferry Road. Neighborhood residents could shop in their neighborhood rather than driving to a more distant commercial location. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 2 f Therefore, we conclude that the proposed zone change would lead to a substantial increase in traffic at the site, would probably lead to some increase in the turning movements at the intersection of 135th and Scholls Ferry Road, but would lead to negligible traffic impacts on the street system away from the immediate vicinity of the site. If the C-N zoning is approved, it appears that adequate controls are available through the site development review process to adequately accommodate the increased potential traffic to and from the site. Impacts on the utility and storm drainage systems from development under the C-N zoning would be approximately the same as those for development under the existing R-25 zoning. Recommendation: The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposed zone change. Washington County's Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and comments: Our primary concerns with this application are traffic and access issues. The County and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) have been jointly developing plans to improve a:d widen Scholls Ferry Road to accommodate existing and projected traffic to the year 2010. Those improvements are intended to support the traffic generated by existing land use plans, not to induce land use plan changes along "he Scholls Ferry Road corridor. The applicant asserts, without tindings, that this plan amendment will reduce congestion on Schollo Ferry Road. C The Scholls Ferry Road project includes elimination of the Old Scholls Ferry/Scholls Ferry intersection by realigning Scholls Ferry Road with Davies Road, constructing a cul-de-sac on the existing Scholls Ferry Road, and vacating the existing connection to Old Scholls Ferry. The signal at this intersection will be removed, and a signal will be installed at SW 135th. Scholls Ferry Road will be widened to 5 lanes and will require additional right-of-way from this site. Final plans have not been completed, so the exact amount of right-of-way needed is unknown, but it will likely be approximately 30 feet, to accommodate a right turn lane at 135th in addition to the through lanes. No access could be granted on Scholls Ferry Road not only because of access spacing criteria (1000 feet), but because of the standing queues at the 135th signal and the additional right turn lane onto 135th. The proposed access on 135th would need to be analyzed, and a traffic impact statement prepared before we could assess its impacts. The additional traffic generated and the additional turning movements at the 1345th/Scholls Ferry intersection may cause an unacceptable level of service for the design proposed in the Scholls Ferry Road project. The State of Oregon Highway Division has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 3 The proposed zone change would generate additional vehicle trips on both SW 135th and SW Scholls Ferry Road. A rough estimate with a 37,000 square foot retail center at 117.9/1,000 is 4360 ATR (average trip rate) compared to 280 ATR for R-25 zoning. This should require a traffic report before it is considered. An access permit is required. Frontage improvement should include a left turn lane as well as the curb and sidewalk. Neighborhood Planning Organization #7 has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: After consideration of the applicant's statement, NPO #7 feels that the subject request can not be supported. A list of the major reasons why we feel we cannot lend our support to this request follows: a. Based on projected transportation and construction for the area, any business would be stressing an already congested intersection area which is planned for an even greater traffic load. b. This property is already zoned R-25. If the zoning were to be changed, then this density level would have to be relocated somewhere else in the city. C. Properties located at SW Scholls and SW North Dakota, and at new Scholls and the proposed Murray extension, both barely outside { the Summercreek neighborhood, are presently zoned Commercial Neighborhood. It is felt that these properties if developed as zoned, would service the area adequately with no need for further zoning of this type. No other comments were received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant approval criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 9, and Goal 10 and City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.6.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.1, and the locational criteria for Neighborhood Commercial designated areas in Section 12.2. The staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the applicable Statewide Goals based upon the following findings: 1. Goal 1 is met because the City has adopted and follows a citizen involvement program which includes review of development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization. In addition, all public notice requirements have been met for the subject application. STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 4 C 2. Goal 2 is satisfied because the City has applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan policies, and Community Development Code requirements in review of the application. 3. Goal 9 is met because the proposal would increase the City's developable commercial land base thereby increasing economic opportunities within the City. 4.. Goal 10 The Metropolitan Housing Rule (OAR 660, Division 7) requires that the average density allowed for all developable residential land within the City's original planning area be a minimum of ten dwelling units per acre. The City's acknowledged plan in 1984 inventoried 1,311 acres of developable residential land in the City and the estimated housing opportunity index was 13,110 units. Since then, eight plan amendments have been approved which in turn amended the inventory. Therefore, the City's current inventory includes 1,290 developable acres and a housing opportunity for 13,112 units (10.16 units per acre). The subject proposal would reduce the amount of developable residential land by approximately 2 acres and the housing opportunity index by 47 units. It is staff's opinion that this property may ultimately be unsuitable for residential development due to its small size and its close proximity to three streets. This situation would be partially alleviated with the proposed closure of SW Scholls Ferry Road at this location. If any residential development were to occur on this property, substantial measures would need to be taken in order to buffer the residents from the adjacent noise and vibration of the three roadways surrounding the property. Consequently, if the property were to be developed as R-25, large building setbacks and buffer areas, on-site accessways, j preservation of the large evergreen trees and the provision of residential amenities such as a pool, carports and/or garages could t reduce the amount of developable land to less than 1.87 acres. As a result, the housing opportunity index would likely be far less than 47 units. i Another Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA 89-07/ZC 89-07, is being considered simultaneously by the Planning Commission and has the E G• potential to add almost 125 dwelling units to the housing opportunity index. This change to the Comprehensive Plan would negate the relatively small reduction in potential housing units pending with this application. Should the Commission rule favorably on both! applications, the City's housing opportunity index would not be P< adversely affected. The staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies based upon the following findings: STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 5 1. Policy 1.1.2, Implementation Strategy 2 is satisfied because the ( policies of the Comprehensive Plan are satisfied as described below and because significant physical changes in the neighborhood, as evidenced by the great amount of development in the area surrounding the subject site, have occurred since the Bite's annexation. Implementation strategy 2 is also stated as Code Section 18.22.040. 2. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because Neighborhood Planning Organization 7 and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. 3. Policy 5.1.4 is satisfied because the neighborhood commercial designation would not result in substantial neighborhood commercial encroachment into a residential neighborhood. The subject parcel is only 1.87 acres large and is already surrounded by residentially zoned land. The encroachment of residentially zoned and developed properties to the northeast, southeast and south can already be readily observed. Immediately to the east of the subject site lie about 17 acres of buildable land also zoned R-25. This land could not readily be developed as C-N designated land because of the Code's two acre maximum size requirement for C-N parcels, which in turn would require a partitioning of the large acreage into smaller parcels. It is speculative but possible that the adjacent land to the east might someday also be rezoned C-G (Commercial General). However, a joint study conducted by the Cities of Beaverton and Tigard on the amount of commercially zoned land within the SW Scholls Ferry corridor concluded that there are ample amounts of commercially zoned land and leasable space already available in the area. Encroachment or Bprawl of existing general commercial land to the east (Greenway Town Center) is not possible because of the Summerlake residential development extends to and abuts SW Scholls Ferry Road inbetween the center and the 17 acre residential parcel and so any resulting future commercial strip would not be contiguous. From the standpoint of good land use planning, the creation of intermittent, abutting commercial and residentially zoned land along the corridor is not desirable. 4. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the proposed redesignation is not anticipated to affect rent levels or housing opportunities in Tigard. Approval of the proposed amendment would not affect the developable acreage of 1,290 acres and the housing opportunity will be decreased but by a small amount. This proposal will reduce the city's housing opportunity by at most 25 units to 13,065 units (10.14 units per acre) (see attached memorandum). So much multi-family development had occurred within Tigard in the last few years that removal of the opportunity to build a relatively small number should not dramatically affect the rental housing costs in Tigard. In 1988, the City Building Division issued building permits citywide for the construction of 229 multi-family residential and 297 single family residential units. Through July, 1989, over 292 building permits have been issued for multi-family housing units and 183 for STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 6 tk. ~f r single family residences. At the half-year mark, the City is already far ( ahead of its total 1988 housing unit total. Therefore, the Metro Housing Rules minimum density requirement will continue to be met by the City if the proposed amendment is approved. f 5. Policy 6.6.1, which requires buffering between different land use types, will be addressed in conjunction with a development application. i 6. Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4 and 7.6.1 have been satisfied because the City Engineering Division will review all utility plans prior to their installation to ensure that they are of adequate capacity, that they meet city design standards, that any new structures will connect to city sewer and that water service for fire protection is accessible. 7. Policy 8.1.1 is satisfied because this property fronts SW 135th Avenue, a minor collector street and resulting traffic will not be directed through existing neighborhoods. 8. The applicable locational criteria for Neighborhood Commercial development are satisfied for the following reasons: a. Spacing and Location f The site size will meet the locational scale criteria of a maximum two acre site for a Neighborhood Commercial zone. Commercial activity will be limited to the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of r SW 135th Avenue and SW Scholls Ferry Road. All other intersections ( will remain residential. On the northern side of SW Scholls Ferry Road, the City of Beaverton has designated these lands Multi-family Residential and Single Family Residential to the northeast. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan contains a spacing requirement for the spatial distribution of neighborhood commercial zoning districts throughout the City. A requirement for a one-half mile service area radius of a neighborhood commercial center is intended to distribute C-N zoning districts throughout the City. Staff notes that.there are currently only three neighborhood commercial zones in the city, one of which is situated along the proposed SW Murray Blvd. extension, about a half mile to the southwest. Another neighborhood commercial zone is located approximately 0.5 miles to the east on the southeastern corner of SW North Dakota and SW Scholls-Ferry Road. The third C-N parcel is located about 3.5 miles to the southeast at SW Durham Road and Hall Blvd. Good land use planning ideally provides for neighborhood commercial zoning districts that are distributed throughout the City and which are close to densely populated residential areas. The purpose of a C- N zone is to provide pedestrian-oriented, small scale services to } residents of the immediate neighborhood. The addition of this 4 neighborhood commercial center could reduce automobile passenger trips to other commercial areas for convenience goods and services, ; STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 7 reduce the duration of such trips and possibly reduce energy consumption. b. Access According to the City Engineering Division, the State Highway Division and the City of Beaverton, a commercial development at this site would likely exacerbate traffic congestion already present in the vicinity of old and new SW Scholls Ferry Roads. Future development on the subject property will be allowed access only on SW 135th Avenue, a collector street, and will not cause traffic to meander through local neighborhoods to get to the site. Additional comments regarding access can be found in a discussion later in this report concerning impact assessment. c. Site Characteristics The site will have direct access from SW 135th Avenue, a minor collector street, and indirectly from SW Scholls Ferry Road. Development on this property will not direct traffic through local neighborhoods to get to the site. The site has no development limitations which would restrict commercial construction other than the proximity of the three streets and the large evergreen trees. d. Impact Assessment The scale of the site will be commensurate with the surrounding residential uses. The size of the parcel is within the maximum allowed by the Code for properties to be designated as neighborhood commercial. The configuration of the site and its relationship with the street system is such that the adjacent residential land to the south can be buffered with landscaping and other screening, specifically a combination of trees, shrubbery and possibly even a fence. Unique features on the subject site primarily include its trees, which can be protected by tree removal permits at the time of development and which can be incorporated into the site's landscaping. Adjoining residential uses can be protected by off-site impacts by careful City review of the placement of building mechanical equipment and loading and parking areas. There are also no adjoining non-residential uses which would be affected by any associated glare, lights, noise and other commercial activities or impacts generated from this site. Four different commenting agencies have noted that the traffic impacts of a commercial development at this site would be greater than that of a residential development. Much uncertainty surrounds the issue of long-term impacts caused by traffic because the much- discussed transportation improvements are still uncertain. It may be that once these and other area-wide improvements have been completed and SW Scholls Ferry Road to the east of the site has been widened, ( then any impacts caused by this proposal and subsequent development STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 8 will negligibly affect the area. However, staff concludes that the current congestion and safety encountered by motorists at peak traffic hours on SW Scholls Ferry Road should not be exacerbated by additional motorists until transportation improvements are in place. In conclusion, staff finds that the proposed Plan Amendment from High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and the proposed Zone Change from R-25 to C-N for the subject 1.87 acre site are generally consistent with all applicable Statewide Planning Goals, City of Tigard Plan policies, and the locational criteria for Commercial Neighborhood development. The City of Beaverton, Washington County, the State Highway Division and staff all share concerns about the short-term impacts of traffic in the area and access to and from the property. The housing opportunity index may be slightly and negatively afected by this proposal; yet approval of other concurrent proposals by the Commission may outweigh a reduction in the housing opportunity index resulting from this proposal. Future construction plans for the SW Scholls Ferry corridor, this intersection and old and new SW Scholls Ferry Road are not final at this time. Therefore, staff recommends that an approval of this proposal be delayed until such time that the public improvements to the area are completed and traffic impacts of any development on the subject parcel can be adequately assessed. C. REO0M30MATION l To forward CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 to the City Council with a recommendation for denial based on the above findings and conclusions. a PREPARED BY: Deborah Stuart APPROVED B E izabeth Newton Assistant Planner Senior Planner v, opA S GaoLL S ~~3 o S.W 9r~ S.W. HAWKS BEARD h ST. vy <''~F J O ' STAFF REPORT - CPA 89-08/ZC 89-08 - GROSS - PAGE 9 Fage 1 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD'S CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant proposes a comprehensive plan map change and zone change (hereinafter called "proposal") to allow commercial neighborhood development on her property located in the southwest quadrant of S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd. and S.W. 135th Ave. (hereinafter called "site"). Specifically, applicant proposes a land use change of her 1.87 acres of essentially vacant land from high density residential, R-25, to commercial neighborhood, C-N. The proposal recognizes the unique location of the site, the unique needs of the residents in the neighborhood, and a better use of the site. Furthermore, the proposal better serves the statewide and the Metropolitan Service District land use planning goals. The site is located in a neighborhood that falls withen the City of Tigard and the City of Beaverton. Applicant identifies the neighborhood (hereinafter called "Summer Creek") as a corridor running north and south, with its borders more or less defined by; S.W. Davies Rd. and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd. on the west S.W. Fern St. and S.W. Walnut St. on the south S.W. 130th Ave. and S.W. 127th Ave, and 1Z8th Ave. on the east S.W. Weir Rd. on the north Summer Creek is unique with respect to its street configuration. Its many cul de sac and loop streets connect with a few collector streets which connect with its one major arterial, S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Rd. and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd. The collector streets that connect to Summer Creek's major arterial area Davies Rd., 135th Ave,, and 130th Ave. to the north of it Scholls Ferry Rd., 135th Ave., and Walnut St. to the south of it Summer Creek is also unique with respect to its developable land inventory. Its inventory is zoned predominantly as R-Z in the City of Beaverton and zoned predominantly as R-25 in City of Tigard. Summer Creek's present development is much higher in residential density than in the past as a result of the high density zoning of its land inventory. S E P- 4- 8 S M ON 1 5 :0-4 O R P A C I n z r l P-0:2 Page Z Summer Creek's street configuration and present land development reflect the need for a commercial neighborhood development withen the neighborhood on its major arterial or one of its collector streets. Applicant's prnposal to'allow commercial neighborhood development on her site serves toa Provide convenience goods and services to Summer Creek's residents withen their neighborhood Reduce present and future automobile traffic congestion on S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Rd. and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd. Reduce automobile fuel consumption by Summer Creek's residents Encourage walking and bicycling by residents for short distances withen their neighborhood Reduce foot and bicycle traffic on S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Rd. and S.W. Scholls Ferry Rd. Strengthen sense of neighborhood identity Meet the convenience goods and services needs of all the residents of Summer Creek, instead of the housing needs of just a few of its residents Provide neighborhood economic opportunities to City of Tigard and City of Beaverton residents The proposal's reduction in Summer Creek's residential land inventory is insignificant. The proposal converts 1.87 acres of R-25 zoned land to C-N land, which reduces developable multiple-family residential units by just 46 units. The site is located adjacent to a state highway. S.W Scholls Ferry Road, with heavy present traffic volume. The site is one of the least desireable locations in the neighborhood for single family residential development as a result of its proximity to the highway. Applicant believes high density multiple-family residential development will abutt the site to the south and the east in the immediate future. The site is adjacent to one of Summer Creek's primary collector streets. S.W 135th Avenue, providing the neighborhood ingress and egress to S.W.' Scholls Ferry Road. The proposal will provide a buffer strip along S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and insulate the neighborhood from the highway's traffic noise and vibration. The site is withen the S.W. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District and abuts S.W. 135th Avenue. Public water and sewer and other utilities. such as electricity and gas, are more than adequate to serve the site's sanitary, health and fire needs. Improvement of*S.W. 135th was completed by City of Tigard in early 1989. t Page 3 The site presents no notable development issues. It is essentially flat. It sits 2-4 feet above the grade of Scholls Ferry Road and 135th Avenue. It exhibits good drainage and ground stability. Natural drainage from the site flows into a natural creek. The site is visibly above the 100 year flood plain. The site presents no extraordinary street development issues. City of Tigard just improved S.W. 135th Avenue. The size of the site precludes extraordinary street access. The applicant envisions site access to 135th Avenue no closer to the Scholls Ferry Road intersection than 300 feet, thus mitigating any traffic congestion impact. The proposalpresents an opportunity to locate land intensive use adjacent to several Trimet transit service proposals. Applicant is urging Trimet to act upon its 3 year old proposal to extend transit service to 135th Avenue with its Garden Home, #45 Route. Trimet planners, Ken Zadarin and Don McDowell, and Trimet scheduler, Joe Schweitz, are in the process of studying whether the residential development in Summer Creek in the last 3 years is sufficient to support this proposal. Applicant believes Summer Creek's recent multiple family residential development will provide Trimet with -the requisite ridership. Trimet staff are also in the process of studying their proposal to extend -transit service along Scholls Ferry Rd. to Murry Rd. and Murryhill with its Scholls Ferry Rd., #56 Route. Furthermore, Trimet staff are in the process of studying their proposal to add transit service between Beaverton and Tigard transit stations along Murry Rd., Scholls Ferry Rd., 135th Ave, and Walnut St. Trimet's board of directors consider these proposals in April of 1990. Applicant commits to constucting a bus turnout lane and shelter on the site, to accomodate Trimet's future transit service, on either Scholls Ferry Rd. or 135th Ave. The site will primarily serve Summer Creek. The present and potential future residential development of the neighborhood provides the site with a trade area of over 5,000 people, assuming single family units house an average of 4 people and multiple family units house an average of 2 people. The site is less than 2 acres. It is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoils Ferry Rd. and 135th Ave. There are no other commercial neighborhood developments or zones withen 1/2 mile of the site. • f t. n Page 4 The site presents an opportunity to locate land intensive use adjacent to future street improvements. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) proposes major road improvements on Scholls Ferry Pd. in the immediate future. Its proposals strengthen the unique location of the site for commercial neighborhood development. ODOT's proposals include; Adopt Old Scholls Ferry Rd. as the state highway west of 135th Ave. Widen the state highway on Scholls Ferry Rd. and Old Scholls Ferry Rd. to five lanes from Fanno Creek bridge to Murry Rd. Vacate Scholls Ferry Rd. immediately to the southwest of 13Sth Ave. and cul de sac it. Extend Davies Rd. south to Scholls Ferry Rd. to connect Scholls Ferry Rd. with the state highway Install traffic signals at the Scholls Ferry Rd. and 135th Ave. intersection. ODOT's proposals significantly reduce traffic congestion on Scholls Ferry Rd. and 135th Ave. Its proposals significantly increase the traffic capacity of the streets and intersection abutting the site. ODOT'=- proposals call for construction to begin in 1989. T E R i i i , 9 'a 6 C f •yw Ml! AAI .O IV I s~ I 1 I SPANIEL STI - J~ I ar.lcorsr~t st ;r. 4( EIT I I pp - ~T m ~N S N SNOwSYOE u`I 1 -A( TO PUBLIC 'P Y s n corrnna' ~ S (PO> c. rJ 4!I > t` ~ • OIL ~ ffF a 3 L ~ I~!J-1 g o S.r. wF'S, BEARD ~ ~4 S N: .~1~~ T n C _ OR r - r -25 (PD) I ~ W 01- 4 cER IR a ,Aa - < LILT •~I i 1 _ wAYE Sw I cr LN a •.NSUMMMAKE PARK Trt; v I J••• FEFF'ELC I s S~ WMAER I.T. V 1 O ~•5 J` . D~ lUIWER CREST is 4 POa W. ASFBURY LA. S.w. M !T ME C ` LN. jt~UL •1O MARY I t ® v ~L_,' L T ARD WOODW • sXE T, (P0) (HDI o~ _ N AIL F AO OF I s.r. 2133 ~s g I ~ ! IU1T 4 3 ~~IL( FLR ! 4 tt c ; 0( V\ A! N O R/jW G 5 FDOF O 8 r Ir \ \ t ' S.w Sr WLLS j r-- X. ANN \ .a. SCOT • _ BVr - NI CT lA. N Ct EXTENSION 0 \ a Avt Sr. B OON I - 11 ` {CT > R e2 SLNART S • - a S W. WALNUT ST. Ai w R25 MARIL CT. C Y PL. ~ GSAN. SW w r ~ 1 i l Sr RTA >T. I A-1 ~ * JA s sr. STANDARD 1/2 MILE SERVICE AREA j to (in red) wl i ti VS SUMMER CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD sw "A !T• (in yellow) 'N -"HINGT ' ISLAND /<s w►T SOME ® ""s RYSRR « ® +Bwgnui+i 29131313 T41TMt ~7Z22Y r+Be11 «.-«:i. dr Prrrr rrr T 4~rtu~ wWtM AIM41 ft'SS'C► ^ pYdt7 BNB1t S5^reS ei~ I puss ^^~e^lii pie C.3 w1/YpttM -i"4 ii- C 1O 12 y+l gB1sg s8f3 pwMANwrxr 88s$8 «•.t•X ! 41St q 9%IAWIC «~«ri~ nnr tl. a ~ 1- a ^ O rY 41WH WrN9 ou"inn~u ncm `u ^O Y+l ~n««« «nn^n 1,,, nnrn frY YWttQ scg q ~ T4KC ~plptt~ c sS'►S s A Tt's5• f e',n dC' a ~~rdB9 :"•1.11« «d,R s'+a~ E a M.O.MitM 6~"j ::.r G o lNtYq ~^«...n: !EJ•$ lowm 9:333 333 - 'S S p rol RRRRR MAR s C riu E. C T41S ^ « .nr m' ~ e['ez1 ^ ~Rb ~ a d Go, W In .p NIY►',{NAZI, ~AARA An:! -w" was E'+ V . C « «.r o -V 5 G 9414 Mf ::ZQ212 Z:22 -up co CO) cz ca {YI ~ 0-) VIVI ana F U Lqv YtYYff ~P~~°S sa33. .C NIWJ YYYUl Sinn.. W O H t Nis AU 4iii H Ri Atop tBIT Nis P••"'« «««"'3 33 wwtM ~nR MARRA A; T nmmo^ «~«rii Jiiu Tlt{Ll mm--- d1 F Z ~ ~95'~K ^ W PONS RR:S«^ :R:Rr.:q:x ax wlTw nBl z,9-1:49 ttxfi«.«e n« -4 94 F Po.• mmo « n r..• I "lung Mi►«°.^•,F',,«« «>rirnR pv► jy wiB~W ^oo~n Y3«««X', : W z Po^ n T ^m mmo^« ^«n. a Mgt C.3 I rY tul4N wr+49 IS 1• ^ TYISV,' av C oao~^«:i~iri ei^.'• QI w E"+ 904 wttq ^•oPe~ «^«n. nr A ^ E_o d119YTIN : Sl'sS'E►s,.,oo....... is E t nt•e R RR 8 d w ~ adn _ E ° Ye10Yp{tBM « «:i. ;r { E T NwBS oao~« ««ii~Yi s ° wYNB1 ^~88 gBSl4^ $4 x ° Asopmo r.ssai iaaaa ss C > TNtil ^ma:e ^~«ri3 irir !Ws i<o+o^^ -i44Yi e1:. x5 1►N►ati ~tfu +L Sgs=_ MMI- a as QG 4ms 9~ ~ y^+ n«g«n L4.t QG ~ m _ «n riffs _07 ~:mo~u~o ii: 2 A T YISMS _ C.0 w 3. C4 I ® SCSiI NNq ►+Nti:s~ .3;sa ca:"-R +R~R m~ ~ A SSeNg r2 owiaa «7A'dt : s>Q«~« .^Q ap3 q+Yg t# o lW4Plat we<i Pow^« ww~vw ier'-r ii + H st'ss'¢► 414_ ° ° YBA S28--s Asgan «3S3« LieAiiii«P : EA 419 i~ ° c c 5 c N 411 BntY o"All Yri~9 rHHxie xA6x= a-.r.« a a~ ■ 3 C.3 22:A3 .A«xx xRAAi fYAii« «O ` ■ sss ^ IC SS'dl 'SS'K, ar o eg A~.s: aas>~an al:~lsa sa - ■ _ < z Nw T pan, 41St j ~ _ wrron asRata aaasssxs sssasa ss C ~ 9419 o~:i:«c ao^Yn•':= «:iiiv~ iii:(ii: iii ~ ~ W9C y 4+4f «8n« axxxs SRASR aRAitii R?~ !414 M! mwnwid Dais^««w.. "ieiii= io « c ~ o ® wY4►f RAn ° S: TS .:a."tA }1RiSx .^V (S i::i n«n«« Oro 1 .-..-..saa sZsxx xtrtt ~o c'T SS•dy9S•fK■ ANlM9 B.SxR S4A8n« ~i~iAi~x S~nx3 0°x g TNtBBf :eiowri: oewwe 'u~irii ii.iNii i:rr \ } lit ■ ^ M+l 8°t8°' S+I &i6ki AxxRS M44" 941st nmwi::: i-eYiPG ii~iiiii rrr O ~ 6 n C PVou"w►N! y{ti,;8« RRxx{I A$Ax> i~~ ` m ~o~~ 4 0 9PsWWT S['sS'[► .NMf s~~3s~ r~_sa AiRfrs~ 71 1 O ; E wtrBgtBM Y:O wOOG1G N~l1~• ""4.- it E ■ : 0- -.8938 P1114M Aalgoo ass.«a a;rssa g;;;; ~ 918111 tP m'o~ a ..AA ~lB~ll' Tt'9zl x BB/ Be APO* Troul .IGMV.% .^=MM Nsx!a _-xvz;; 33i O rKMI nr:~Q':~' i•:i~:deci o^«_'iJii 3~ r--- --1 sw c- wA ! Xac ' 064'ET; -I I ~I I sl S!L SPANIEL ST Sr.i COYSIXL T ~r, ' s d ~ ~ s • :MlLO«AT ~ r Q -EVC'.yD r~ n ~N s « SXOwSrOE .X t d 4...... an BP TO PUBLIC ! v SN .11 -OT T!!I'AI• 1 (PDT i C ~C a~~V\V\~o~~ 60 s« - -25 (PD) B0. r - ~ \ _ _ _ < o4cleA LILT c'A '"~i' f` wAE r w cr -'sUMMERLAKE /PARK \ Lr . N v I X[FF'ELC llN~Kn n. 4.5 Summ" cnEST s. 11-1 d asl~unr LU. S.W. w Fri C L \ \ O/~ LM f i sw V - ~X; " LA ProXT 0, ~ Fw1Alay (HO W. roO ■onoRB I-L cX A ON . \ \ S.W. 33 4 33 Is ! %ATRERrc 4 3 a. 5 4 si \ e` ow ro \ \ 3 i r ' \ S NOON L S.w 0 - Sr WLLS \ W. SCOT CT SA/~ - M cr s r. .d ` % T .r. AMR PL El NS 1 0 N + AVE Sr. BAOOR R -/2 1 cr = > K Y NART S w y • S W. m%aff S!. RAs 25 i s ROM R. r Pt. • s.r. S w R• -LL W • Q ~ I I Sr nrA !r. TRIMET PROPOSAL FOR sx JAMS ST. EXTENSION OF GARDEN HOME, si #45, TRANSIT SERVICE ^i I ~ it sr•~ __WA~HINGT ISLAND ~S. r TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR BESTING - OCTOBER 3, 1989 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center - TOWN HALL - 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Castile, Fyre, Leverett, Rosborough, and Saporta. Absent: Commissioners Barber, and Peterson. Staff: Assistant Planner Jerry offer (left 10:00 PM); Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart; Planning Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioner Saporta abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o President Moen announced that Agenda Item 5.3, an appeal from NPO 3 regarding manufactured homes, is being postponed to the October- 17th Planning Commission hearing. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMEPT CPA 89-07 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-07 METZGER-EMS/ROCKWELL NPO #5 A request for approval of a comprehensive Plan Amendment from (Commercial Professional) to Medium-High Density residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Commercial Professional) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). ZONE: C-P (Commercial Professional) LOCATION: West side of SW 72nd Avenue, between SW Varns Street and SW Fir Street (WCTM 2S1 1DB, tax lots 800 & 801, 2S1 1DC, tax lot 3600) Assistant Planner Jerry Offer reviewed the proposal and staff's reasons for recommending approval. Discussion followed regarding building heights and the density transition between a R-3.5 and R-25 zone and why R-12 is not being proposed. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Mark Rockwell, Criterion Equities, 1800 One Main Place, 101 SW Main St., Portland, OR 97204, reviewed the existing condition of the property and uses which would be permitted. He reviewed reasons and the need for the proposed change from C-P to Residential and why R-25 versus R-12 would be better suited for the property. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1969 - PAGE 1 building 20 feet from their property line. He felt 9 years as a long time to ask a property owner to be patient. Also, that traf is would be 50% les than a commercial development and would not enetrate the neighborho d. He felt that the concerns for increased cr' a are unfounded and that e n homes in the Rolling Hills Subdivision ha been allowed to run down; t t the $50,000 units they proposed woul not denigrate but would enhance the area and increase home values. He id not feel the R-40 density allowed\above the first floor in the Tria gle was a serious zone as it has not even been able to work downtown Por and. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Leverett favored the reques o Commissioner Rosborough felt that is was a high quality proposal. However, he was unsure whet r the iteria had been met. He did not feel a mistake had been made. o Commissioner Castile was impre s d with the design, however, he felt the C-P zone should be preserved. o Commissioner Pyre felt th t this is good development; however, there are no guarantees that t is is the prod ct that would be constructed. He did not feel that the riteria had been et for a change. He felt that perhaps the entire ar should be looked at for a change to multi-family. o Commissioner Saport did not feel the criteria ad been met. o President Moen w s concerned that the criteria ha not been met to warrant a change. He ad a problems with abutting R-25 an R-3.5 zones. He felt that density transition and buffering help, howev r Rolling Hills is unique and a City did make a commitment to protect th subdivision. o Commissio er Pyre moved and Commissioner Castile secon ed to forward CPA 89- and ZC 89-07 to City Council with a recommendati n for denial based the finding that the proposal did not meet the crite 'a to allow a change in the Comprehensive Plan: 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 89-08 ZONE CHANGE ZC 89-08 GROSS NPO #7 A request for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium-High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and a Zone Change from R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) to C-N (Commercial, Neighborhood). ZONE: R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of SW Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th Avenue. (WCTM 1S1 33CA, Tax Lot 100) Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart reviewed the proposal, the proposed area- wide road improvements to State and County roads, and made staff's recommendation for denial. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 1989 PAGE 5 PUBLIC TESTIMONY ` o Gary Coe, 11115 SW 135th, Tigard, OR. 97223, felt the proposal was being requested in order to slow down the sale of adjoining properties and to drive up the price for this site. He felt they could end up with a McDonald's on the site and he opposed the proposal. REBUTTAL o Bill Gross stated that the developer was no longer interested in purchasing their site because of the wetlands to the west and south. Also, the C-N zone does not allow a use such as McDonald's. PUBLIC SEARING CLOSED o The majority of the Commissioner felt the proposal was premature and did not meet the criteria to amend the Plan. o President Moen commented that the existing C-N zone would be better suited at this location and could be considered a mistake. * Commission-Saporta moved and Commissioner Rosborough seconded to forward CPA 89-08 and ZC 89-08 to City Council with a recommendation for denial. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. President Moen voted no. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o There was no other business 7. ADJOURNMENT - 11:15 PM Diane M. Jelderks, Secretary ATTEST: A Donald Moen, President dj/1-24PC PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - , 1989 - PAGE 6 Page 1 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD'S CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION FILE NO.: CPA 89-8 / ZC 89-8 Applicant proposes a comprehensive plan map change and zone change (hereinafter called "proposal") with respect to her property located { in the southwest quadrant of S.W. Scholls Ferry and S.W. 135th (hereinafter called "site"). Specifically, she proposes a land use change from high density residential, R-25, to commercial neighborhood, C-N. The proposal recognizes the unique location of the site, as well as, the unique past and potential development in the site's neighborhood (hereinafter called "Summer Creek"). The proposal concludes that the best use of the site is commercial neighborhood, C-N, rather than the present high density residential, R-ZS. The site is unique with respect to its surrounding streets and wetlands. Scholls Ferry is to the north and west. Perpetual wetlands are also immediately to the west of Scholls Ferry. S.W. 135th is to the east. Perpetual wetlands and the 100 year floodplain are ZSO-350 feet to the south. The site is one of the most unsuitable locations in Summer Creek for single family residential development due to road noise and vibration. The site is unsatisfactory for multiple-family residential development due to its small size (less than Z acres). Assembling the site with properties to the south does not result in a preferable size for multiple-family development (less than 4.S acres) due to the surrounding perpetual wetlands to the south. Assembling the site with properties to the west is impractical due to the perpetual wetlands to the west, even if Scholls Ferry: running southwest, is vacated as a result of the Davies Road extension. The site is the most suitable location for commercial-neighborhood c development due to its proximity to Scholls Ferry and 13Sth. Scholls Ferry is a major lateral transit corridor to and from the 217 Highway, as well as Summer Creek's major arterial. 135th is one of Tigard's recent LID street projects, as well as one of Summer Creek's collector streets. The site is the most suitable location for C-N development because it does not encroach into present residential areas nor preferable potential residential areas. The site is the most suitable location for C-N development because present and preferable potential multiple-family residential areas do almost completely surround it. Page Z The site is unique with respect to its location in relation to other present or potential retail centers. It is almost equidistance from the Greenway Town Center (zoned C-G), the future St. Vincent Medical Campus site (zoned C-N and C-P), Murrayhill (zoned NS) and the potential Murray Road extension retail center (zoned C-N). Summer Creek is unique with respect to its street configuration. Its many cul de sac and loop streets connect with only a few collector streets which, in turn, connect with its one major arterial, S.W. Old Scholls Ferry and S.W. Scholls Ferry; running east-west (hereinafter called Scholls Ferry). This past street configuration will force future street development to adopt the same configuration. The result is that Scholls Ferry is a bottleneck for Summer Creek residents on their way to and from home. Summer Creek is also unique with respect to its developable land inventory. Its inventory is zoned predominantly as R-Z in the City of Beaverton and zoned predominantly as R-Z5 in City of Tigard. Summer Creek's present development is much higher in residential density than in the past as a result of the high density zoning of its land inventory. 1.1.1 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT: c. THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ARE KEPT CURRENT WITH THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY. The Plan does not recognize the needs of present and future Summer Creek residents in the near future. 5.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROMOTE ACTIVITIES AIMED AT THE DIVERSIFICATION OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO TIGARD RESIDENTS WITH PARTICULAR EMPHSASIS PLACED ON THE GROWTH OF THE LOCAL JOB MARKET. The proposal provides Tigard residents job opportunities in the near future. 6.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A DIVERSITY OF HOUSING DENSITIES AND RESIDENTIAL TYPES AT VARIOUS PRICE AND RENT LEVELS (the City shall encourage housing development to occur, to the oreatest extent passible, on designated buildable lands in areas where public facilities and services can be readily extended to those lands). The proposal encourages multi-family residential development to occur. The proposal provides present and future multi-family residents convenient access to convenience goods and services in the near future. The proposal encourages multi-family residential development where public facilities and services can be readily extended. e•. Page 3 8.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PLAN FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT STREET AND ROADWAY SYSTEM THAT MEETS CURRENT NEEDS AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. The proposal provides an oppportunity to reduce traffic on Scholls Ferry in the near future from Summer Creek residents in pursuit of convenience goods and services. The proposal provides an opportunity to relieve traffic congestion at the east end of Scholls Ferry in the near future where traffic congestion is already severe. 8.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS; b. STREET RIGHT-OF-WRY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH; c. THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO CITY STANDARDS WITHEN THE DEVELOPMENT; d. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACTS; e. STREET IMPROVEMENTS BE MADE AND STREET SIGNS OR SIGNALS BE PROVIDED WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT IS FOUND TO CREATE OR INTENSIFY A TRAFFIC HAZARD; f. TRANSIT STOPS, BUS TURNOUT LANES AND SHELTERS BE PROVIDED WHEN THE PROPOSED USE IS OF A TYPE WHICH GENERATES TRANSIT RIDERSHIP. Applicant agrees to the preconditions to development. Applicant requests approval of the proposal in order to plan for the future. 8.Z.Z THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE THE EXPANSION AND USE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY: a. LOCATING LAND INTENSIVE USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO TRANSITWAYS (the City shall propose land use densities, withen the Comprehensive Plan, along transit oriented corridors that support public transportation service). The proposal provides intensive land use in close proximity to a major transitway in the near future. The proposal provides intensive land use on the most probable Trimet service routes in the near future. Page 4 v 12.2.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE TYPE OF USE, ITS SIZE AND REQUIRED TRADE AREA (Neighborhood Commercial centers are intended to provide convenience goods and services withen a cluster of stores. Convenience goods are goods which are bought frequently and for which people do not engage in comparison shopping. The uses permitted in the neighborhood center include convenience markets, beauty shops, etc.); The proposal provides for commercial development that is reasonable and preferable in density and compatible with the surrounding present and future multi-residential development. b. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES; c. APPLY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE OF THE PROJECT (The proposed center shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination shall be based on the street capacity, existing and projected traffic volumes, the speed limit, number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of the most intensive use allowed in the zone). The proposal itself does not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. The site access on 135th (as far as 330 feet from the intersection at Scholls Ferry) is safe. The site access itself does not create congestion on 135th. 135th is 60 feet wide (with no allowable street parking) at site access with ample room for a left turn center lane. The concern with traffic congestion and safety centers on the 135th intersection at Scholls Ferry. ODOT plans to install signals at 135th in the near future (as soon as 1991) which eliminates this concern. Applicant requests approval of the proposal subject to the preconditions of development as recited above. Applicant believes that a developers' consortium will assist ODOT in funding signals installation at 135th and Scholls Ferry, in the event ODOT funding is inadequate. SUBMITTED BY a. DATED pd~~ 3i y9~9 E. ALEEN GROSS ~ " G ;v ' ~ "f ;~r- t~ u a esl-3 q -rte . , Z.,"_'j~. ,w.. _ - ":air. F:a . - ~ _ - " {f~l'{► 1{I~I{I I{O~Ip 1,1 Z[0 iJi~i{i 6jT11{i 1{i~({f ~ Tm k~ljl{I i Tai ~ I I I f~ T{I IJI 1 {i ~i 6 I{t I 1 In .1)1 ?h !p tll 111.{T I{! 111 iit III ill ttl it ~ ~ ~ a } i J. ! _f~~'1 (v ~ !i~ I{~ ~+C.~ I ► I it ~ y ~ ! ~ ! + . _ ; ~ ~ z a ~ _ s PUTE: If THIS HICAOFSLt&0 6 _ _ ~ 8 8 ~ 0 i l....._ ..:J ~ ~ owu~uc is LESS aeAR Tsui I ~I ~ ~ " TMts dOTIiF, Ir is oue m ~ , . iFE QUALITY OF TIE 6RIGSNAL I~ ' DRAPING. yr 0£ 6Z 8Z LZ 82 SZ 4Z £2 ZZ iZ OZ 6t 81 LI 91 Sf ~il vEl~ ZI Y II `01 6 8 L 8 S 4 E Z 1~' t`' _ i t Itl _ 'Nlgllu~Illl~illl~IIII~IIU~iN~ ~ v i , I„ rc. .~.:,..~r.~ . ~ tt i ~~IIII~~ _ - V~ ` C p e - ~ ..i' ' TQ ° ~t= FlE~.D _ -i ,.~~0' f~ i:iood Plains ~ 3)rain sways 5~~~~~. ag r 9 y Watiands - - i Significant Wefitc'tdt ~I. r' ~ . _ vz,'= +984 ~'N'.7R'i'7~~ w Ce. ~ ~iw. » ..'ii e Ate' i / .F tl ~ ~.'I- ti 1 ..3. ~ . ! I r . I~ ' ~ ~ _ l.._ ~ .s_ l~~ N'.iw , E f . , l i ~ ti. ~ L i ~ z,"~,~., ~ .:e~,,%r area" r 5. F :xy ~ ~ >w , . • ` f ~ aG .M'~i. L ::C- ~i }f.a d.;.r h .'e.° - ` j Viz) ~ a . ~ yyY i • + `G ' ~ t ~ ...;4_ ~r . 5. . ~llllfliillllit gt1yrllt~lp Ijllt+l Illllll Illil~ Tj~1lTllln Ifl III IIT R+~IIt III I I III I _..'"""_-""'_""°~'_.-."._.,.""'s'--`c':`^.°^'~„_"'.'""".... ~ ~ ~ ( ( ~ I ~ ~ T.. 3 ~ I ~ f~rll l+lill~ III III III IIt Ill 111 Ili yl IIl -1+1111 III 1 I I 1 Ill I I rl"' I ) l I) 1 J l ~.1 ~ 1 ~ I J ~ ~ il~li l+1 N)TE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - ~ 1 ~ 2 3 4 _ 5 fi 7 8 9 I~0 +I I , ORAMII~G 1S IESS CLEAR TNM THIS NOTICE, IT 25 DUE TO ' 1HE QUALITY OF 7FE ORIGINAL DRAMING. - - - - - - OE 6Z 8Z LZ 9Z SZ 4Z EZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 BI LI 91 SI' 4t EI ZI II 01 6 8 1 9 S 4 E Z I~ F , inl~aulmt~uuhm~mtliul~mOntl~imllnGn~ ~._~'~a„"1". ~I~.m,L,,,G.ya;u!~;.L,.d.,,d,~..,,1...,t,,.;~.;,:.,a;,,.!,..I. _ wt4wlom ' ~I , • _ _.e. a, . _ j - c a y _,+ST C(T T ~:1L T. i{£ Yt$%Jlf - S - CY _ _ t S, G EE~€YVAY$ ABU OPEC! SPACE . ~ . . - - : - . - -i~~~c~ , v_ _ \ _ e'er y~'T` -~A 1F(5LF *1 p/~~ ; ' " _ y-- _ - _ ~p _ _ V~~IKTRFN i J r_ ~ ' SET*_~ ~t7 ~.~i - 4 - ' 1- _ :~'I~C.~.,:~ '~s +'~e'AI~~1~.'i' ,~9t34.~'* i£:;.:.C)PiY~fT e`` _ ~ - ~ _ R _ w X - l f ~ r _ . - i ~ _ ~ : esq.., ,-y~•-,-,y'. ys/ S2 3 .4~-~ ra_ ~ - _ Y ~y-~ I;. _,_r,_ ..,fir, c k r . AVER ~ r • ~..~~~~~1~~ E S 4 . , , I ~ H+M I i 3 tar^~ i I« 1 i - a~ ~ I~.. I. i ~ _ L ~ - _1 ,~-r~-„ • is ,Y: ,,,~,1;~i - ~ ~1 _ ~ 1--- - - ~ I ~ ~ n r ~ a _ - - g _ r r ~,,C 'i t I %y-- ~ ~ C i ~ . i ~ ~ o~ I . ! _ 1 , I~ r 0 _ c :I ',~1 - ..,,w r~'r OL1L~~O~~~~6 ~ ~ I I. 1 I I : . W,a a ~t'~ ~_T RG,E j' i ~ .''"i~~';~: • :::f: \•i:::.: Pll I'1Y ~ae ~ ~I ~f ~ "`UUUCCCJJJ 1k_ WE T R _ _ . ~ J S E N r ~1~ /I OIYISIGN ~ ~ II ~ _ I ~ t ~ " \ _ I~ (I OffIGE ~ ~ I ~ _ ~SUMYENLAKE /WRK ~ n - - o ~ ~ _ ~`I ~ _ _ Q ',r111'I~ltl'11111'I'I'I'!'t'I'I'Silil9lllIIIIIIII11111TI!'~~Pi'(mllU(IIIIfTjR~gi~llftjl~lll tlr)gl IIIlIIfIIIII! III !I! 111 )11 III 111 11! !11 III 111 111 lat 711 Ili 17~1.,d*,--- _ . ~ I 2 3 C 1 ! ) j l !.I ~ I! I I i l l l !ii I NDTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - 4 _ ~j 6 ~ 8 9 O II i2. ' DRAWING IS LESS CIEAR IRAN - THIS NOTI~, IT IS DUE TO . THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL , OE 6Z BZ LZ 9Z 52 42 EZ 22 IZ OZ 6t BI LI 81 SI' ~ bl EI ZI II 01 ~ 6 8 t 9 S b E Z I°++i e Enllnulunlunhul~NNl17uluNIln~NUl _ 1 ' I '~II'''', , t _ I!>plWlllll , I. . _ , - , ti ` I ~ , _ - g.~'~°r'---r _ 3--~ r-a ` r 3 1 - c'7 i .ti ~ ~ ~ ' ' 7~-. ~ _ E_ - -s t - ,::gv may„ - -s ~`~~~,~,Z - _ , Fin : t - a r ~ i ,r > ~ }ii _ - _ a f~B _v ~s ~ p,~f ~ .~Y ~ , - x ~ ; ' w i~ ;N+Jt~=i ~ . .83 - y 1 • , ,y~' ~ 1 ~ 83 X81 t ~ ~ f f f f. = ± 3 ck;~K',~'i~i c. - ! c , a'rc' :,t. ~ r ' ~ .1 bK i ~ T~"~s. NATURAL RESOURCE DISTRICTS . ~ I. i a l.r _ ~ _ -q ~ ~ 61 ;r,.:caC ~I~' i~,- J%' Proloctad Propar!/~s ~ 1' ~ ~ s r,.•;, 88 87 i x..68 . " ~ _ _ _ _ --.~.a,y,"~ ~ ~ ®S~na/llw Prap~rtlss 79 ~ : ~ i v _ ~ 1 74 _p__ _ u"TO 84 ~ ~ ? O~slgn Cancarn ProperUoa - N' ~ r ~'T6 ' 72 tvaw,r..e«bmnweuww ~a ~lMprovemenf Propertlso , b~ w~xoy~TMmn .+naao 85 17 G w~a.a< _ ~aau.eauma..aanaramro.~ _ ~ ~ Z WoHandai 100 Yr. Floodp/alnt 10016 FiuyviBoavY UU,bon wya.n +9e0 w.ao~+~. r~w.ao nrwp OWaiaO q Wmd Woa. matrob M Fap ~ `~R~~YYIC MMIIIYIIII Dart l~r FbpgYi 9pvdyl ~~pp~F1T r~CIM1d ~I~YtIII Ayd nrgbri 0w - AaMI Laa bon i9Ei MeW uW VaPauM Waiar.On6 armaYq - - . ~ ~ MaP • . 86 b»GydBaeM RS maps bfasf Pel. ~ _ _ ~ s.mCa~a fo NtYCgcnu haWnau mn ~ Drama aew~a noo, xmueeraaraeeww. `4y: mu9'""'voxa ~ CITY T V OF BEAV ~R 0 OREGON - - --_w--Y-.__~.::~.~_~. ~ ~ l 1 I I I ~ I I I ~ I I I I I i t 9 I1 11 Ifl Ifl T i i l l i l f Iii Tl 101 .i i I I l l i ~W.:a-~ rf ~ f (l l o l l 11 I fJ 1~ f l i l i I 1 (mTmi i t i t ~R9 ~ i.~ f i b MITI I~I~i ►~1 ill e i I~I Illhflp Iplil~ ip~ili Ifilili Ili~ip ili'q> ryi~+i a ApTE: I IS MICROFILMED 4 5 6 ~ 6 8 ~ 11 12 DRANING I$ LESS CLEAR THAN I - - 1H15 NOTICE, IT I$ DUE TO I iFE L TY F A 0 TIE ORI INAL G W DRgWIAG. _ OE 8Z 82 LZ 9Z SZ 42 EZ ZZ IZ OZ 8t BI ❑ 91 50'' bl EI ZI II 01 6 8 [ 9 5 6 E Z ' e ~nifuuluN~uNluu~imNxi~imhih~nrl u ~ ~ , . - - - - ~ . - ,_~t. ~ a F t l s ~ ~ ~ b E ;~J L ~ ' ~ l ,I uw ....-..J -T-^M~~ ~ y,,:r.. ~i~-'kr A, .."J... r•e =.V~'.+¢f4i ..._,w.:nvc~ww :'::.n'i'r.~. "'*k::" ~ ^4~ ~ ~~i~ I~ilyr~IL~L~~!' 91l 11 11 11I F - ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _I 1 ~ (f ~!i (1 j i } ~I~~~~~ ~ j!t 1 fFj►1~ I 1 ~i~ IT(fF1~►t►(+li~;•il,o~ll1(► i9rP~111IIf7SL1~ ilyFlr i 1jllIIll1(I►I I,Ii11L(~,y~► 3 u 1 6 ' rb~: IF rNtc MICROFILMED 2 3 4 _ _ 5 6.. 7 8 8 6 . 11 _..1 . ' ORApIIG IS LESS CLEAR 1HAN i ~ ~ ~ - ~Nts Nonce, n Is ouE rD ! . 1FIE QDALIiY DF'1!E ORIGINAL DRAIING, i sau. ~ R. 0£ 6Z 8Z LZ 8Z SZ bZ EZ Z2 BZ OZ 61 81 d1 91 S► bl Et ZI t► Ok 6 8 L 9 5 b E Z I , 'uyl(1►nllnl(mdLU~uuhui~ , _ I i ~ ~ ~ i y~r a - r. ~ fi. . ` L. _ ~ i _ ~ re. _ 2 _ 8 i _ _ ~ ~ 4 _ tLi i_ 4, cs / i - ~ _ .._.v . _ ~ ~ ~ ~e9ef~ r t 7rf`!S EU/LG/NC O!•f<>? O/JLa STOQS~ s / / s 'f t iw. ~P ~ 7N TtilG :FTOR/L'J ~QG. ` O Z2,~• 1 i. _ - _ - ~9 i - - 7 , 2 Q . _ , - -u - - _ , q h ~o ; , ~ .,.x.'. ~ n } ~ /iG. V~ Cover '.K i . t . ~ ys. . t/ , ~ ~ ~ r ~ r . ` ~ A ^ - / ~w_ I Stvub Plant' Q U «.~L.~ - - ~ -.:t ~ gin' <<a. < ~ .»~;~r N gar - 4 ~ ~ , f~~ ~ ;~C/in tteeleun e[ leest~ r -v P=ray Q I - ~ 2 f yD I~ ~ gee lean et 1•esc on: ~ • ~V~ li C_ e.,Y unr~.~ ere.r• qh~ ' ! J/~ ~ V ` r Z~ a. Y~j/~'~ \ ~ ci. onl .r0 ~ ~ _ n' v I1T 2 Vr^, 1 i ! _ e x v 4 : L v~ l ~ I <sc5 3 2t e ~iq~~ cFG'.xab e~-e€. u 1 " e ~ .s'r:F. III ' j :~BJ ~ ~ -A- , i~ , r n {p/li(~'y/'-1, ~ it ~I ~ = 1 VQ rf - I~,II ' - r~~2 r e, ~ $ e~~6a~>~~51~eq L, c; ~ r, ro i 1 Ja 7" ri !O / T - .J _ ,.i,<:.i' ae e ^ 'o° Tree Stakin . ~..r` l: lad 1 sa ;lei! ~ ~r,r; A I'~' `l 3€U 3R0 3RU ~5e '/I' 4v✓ 11 ;f' ~ ,J %g .f: , / I/ t r r I z i r i /5 IMP :y' /7 /B l`7 4~k 1, /~i°, ~il,~ ~ 2~~~ 2D ~ ~^iJ ~ ~ ~ r"` 1 ~ 4 d J. ,,2/ r y 6, % J : .i J r i%„ c ,f` ~ ~ , ~x - ~ i. a , I~., I s ~ IVY TRASH CNCL03'U4`C a WG__:nF.1 dQuplcl ' OL, YftFtO L/CHT voda7,EC a Ilp~n I ~ ~ I IIin~In~IliYn I 1119 11999~~~ppVq I I ~ 1141'Iq I~q I I I VI~~ opal i I n~ I'I Illlnpu'nl ~ I I~~Iplgll9gll ~i I l ~ i Iw - E 3 9 5 6 ] B B 0 11 12 ~I~' a~Mw~nri L2 d 2 2 22 5 K C2 2 1 02 1 I I I I I ZI I OI S a 2 f! 2 2 2 D A 11 9 5 1[ I L I I ~~41d~~nh~~d~I~~Ir~.d~~d~mll~~~WII~nIlou61uYw41n41nhm6uV~Iluouulwllllllwlnnluu4uhuJuuhnVwlwlnnlnldlntlmlVltllln6mluuW~ i I i I I 1 i I i IIIIVIIduIVuu6lVlluuulld _ _ MARCH ~ 8 ,1990 I F. F Ste: T.SS°=. S:i= ~f S:3r >3..i>~ ~ ~..ca. .I .4c _ . " . . ,.ya. - . _s - t -r-....'r 'ac. _ _ ° ti. - _ ,t.s .ri. a _ y a e i e _ ~ _ _ __.~-_4 X8~ , _ jr]~a ~ - : _aat wr+ - ~ .w-.va s ~ ~ t 3 .e - J e a _ _ err rz : - - ' - - - - - - - _ a,.w. - - ~ r _ ~ v, q Q - I J « ~ h ~5 ~ ~ ~ .r: - , ~ ~ MT G ~s . f .d..e. , ~ tfu/l- - e.;; t «w.a.m....~,.c e Y ~ . rte' ' a , , . ' ~ t,.., ~ , V ~ . P e.,« .r .trml. a . « w....... tr. Im Q ~a, ' 'f dr/! ,w.ru:rn cxP ~ of . ly a..r. Sms.li.e :o •}If .u: t Srtytm. 1 Miq •m •r r. • ~ / I 9 C%t~ y isrwelm.d pl«tIM ams «lM eles . t .aa w.a-n« . ~ i~.xi: ~7•-. r ~ : urr wm t«« mtlltta~w rotlry cN ewm Kun la ~ _ . 'l r eeseaw et ttw r•aee•t ter tl~tiw i! mvRtslgr aw r' r k.. tame •t th [iw yr tM Snpettim, rrKtiw eetlen • ' ~ ~ ' - ~ ,m.e.e, am «et:w. «Sat.e.z. w~eii u. , l ~yf~ ~j. ~.r; ~ , ~ i I«P.<eaa ma tam.t .eeeaeae:.. O Y • ...cFY l , ~ f _ . m a.mnm .a l.ae .ar Pl.auMa r. ...emm .m Y i11. ~J~ ~ .i~t - m.:aialoa wm aeane. er em•r. nane.aaec. 1. m a ~r p ` la<:xe. all rerk ee to w.n nec.rl.l* la a n.nltnr 1 \ t ~n~ taMltlon, Ce : lew eM keP ell a G \ F 4 Bison a:M r e-tree rater ea n cs«eryte vend eM Glenn '1 v«kly M w tee law least Wlce prior / ~ { ~i,s [e tteatantt Snapsttlon aM Wge law et least a Iyyl I • Pemulc6 Mess erns ane eew[a eu[ anY unrven Braes. Vl ~ ~ ~Vlrf eb a ~_I' 2-•=" ~ l -~~--J ~~~lll~l G S I _ Y ','rte, ! °~--i u"1 h~ ~ _ x,r ; ~f j .'I' JF 1 I ~ Y 11. ~ " ~r~ r~ ' /sa% Yf~~. l3' "~f ~ nc. fr. t'j,`r L' 'r ~.~.z ~ 'rj f III _ /3 ~ p v G x, s au P, ~ II ~a.~' ~ . . X1 r I j 'y.~ r h r ? f ' 3 RU 3 RB ) RAI ,f /5 /T ~ !6 { 't I'r,j P ~ . ~ q. E,. ~ 4+a r.' '~f.~~'i{i.• / t claf~l' > f.~ A S". i °9 raa ,a7 ..r L. ~ , . ~ I11~pV~p PVC Igil ~ n Ir~IVpl ~ II4I~IVIIU~I~III~N~m~IO~V~lll~pl~ggpi~ I n~ggn~~pgil ~ npll~ I ~ Ir~ippu~il I pl I I~J~VIq~~~l~pn~~npl ~iVli - I ' 2 3 4 6 e 1 e 0 0 I I I tale Gum dltif mweuu n a_.zE-1 t c x c x l °A""' oc ez`ce ¢ u a a dz ei ~ n u m ci p u al II of - a n~lilniL8in6nl.e4eM{~' ' ' ' ' ' 'y 8 - - MARCH _ I__ 1,1990-_ - ~JvN- O'yenda, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 1. AGENDA OF: 10/23/89 DATE SUBMITTED: 10/20/89 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Pak-Best,Inc^ PREVIOUS ACTION: none Ore Bus Dev Fund Resolutio'+ ~An PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts, Admin Plan DEPT HEAD O ITY ADMIN OK',':'// REQUESTED BY: Pat Reilly, City Admin POLICY ISSUE To adopt a resolution expressing support for Pak-Best, Incorporated's application for an Oregon Business Development Fund loan. INFORMATION SUMMARY Pak-Best, Inc., located at 17333 SW Bonita, is a newly organized company that will manufacture high quality shopping paper bags, folding paper board boxes, and custom gift wrap. The company also will manufacture industrial quality envelope boxes. Pak-Best has applied for an Oregon Business Development Fund loan to enable it to purchase printing and manufacturing equipment. With such equipment the company estimates that it will be able to provide 50 jobs in its first year of operation and approximately 100 new jobs by the end of its third year. In order to qualify for a Development Fund loan, the jurisdiction in which the project is located must pass a resolution expressing its support. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Not to support the application. FISCAL IMPACT The passage of the resolution will not obligate the City in any way. As for state fiscal impact, it is pertinent to note that the Oregon Economic Development Department does a thorough credit check before taking any action on requests for development fund loans. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the resolution. In terms Of land use, the proposed project is classified as light-industrial and the project will be sited on land designated for this use. The project also is consistent with city economic development policies r and implementation strategies.