Loading...
City Council Packet - 06/19/1989 le TI:GARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate STUDY AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, JUNE 19, 1989, 5:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TI:GARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 5.30 1. STUDY MEETING 1.1 Call to Order and Roll Call 1.2 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. NON-AGENDA ITEM; : From Council and Staff 3. CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN DISCUSSION 4. WORKSHOP MEETING WITH PARK BOARD (7:00 PM) 5. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d), (e), & (h) to discuss Police Chief selection, labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 6. ADJOURNMENT /r cw/9970D 1. COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 19, 1989 - PAGE 1 I T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L MEETING MINUTES - June 19, 1989 - 5:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon (arrived at 7:00 p.m.), Valerie Johnson, and Joe Kasten; City Staff: Pat Reilly, City Administrator; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN DISCUSSION: a. Relocation Policy: Senior Planner Newton reviewed the draft relocation policy which had been distributed to Council. She advised the draft was modeled after the regulations currently used by the Portland Development Commission (PDC). She noted the PDC regulations were a good model because they incorporate the Federal Uniform Relocation Act regulations enacted in March of this year and have been reviewed by PDC legal counsel. Senior Planner Newton advised the draft was intended as a starting point for council discussion. It was recommended that the finalization of the relocation policy be assigned to the Advisory Committee which was scheduled to be formed after the election. Council discussion followed concerning the preparation of the final relocation plan. Council consensus was for staff to submit the draft policy on a future agenda for Council to formally accept the document. The draft could then be used for reference when answering citizen inquiries until development of the final policy after the election. b. Land Use Discussion: Senior Planner Newton distributed pages entitled "Central Business District Non-conforming Land Uses" and "Central Business District Permitted Land Uses." After reviewing each of those businesses which presented existing non-conforming uses, she explained some of the ramifications of implementing criteria specified in the Development Plan. Existing businesses would be affected should they try to expand or discontinue their use. She noted that in trying to orient the Central Business District towards pedestrian traffic, Council should consider how land uses would affect the downtown area; that is, would they be "pedestrian friendly." She suggested Council may want to consider establishing several districts within the area; i.e., pedestrian traffic was to be located on Main and Burnham Streets while automobile-type uses be located on Commercial Street. Discussion followed. Mayor Edwards expressed concerns that a mix of uses was needed in the downtown to attain economic viability. Page I - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1989 The Council reviewed the lists for the non-conforming and conforming land uses. Council consensus was to remove "adult entertainment" as a conditional use. 1 Discussion then centered on the uses in the downtown area and the market structure which would be necessary to compete with regional shopping centers. i There was discussion on the merits of encouraging multi-family residential in the downtown area. If a substantial number of family units were in the downtown area, this would probably encourage retail to follow. Compatibility was also a primary f concern. City Attorney, in response to a question from Councilor Johnson, advised council should focus on one item, such as residential development. r r i Council meeting recessed at 6:55 p.m. ! (Councilor Eadon arrived at 7:00 p.m.) i Council reconvened at 7:05 p.m. ' I 3. COUNCIL WORKSHOP WITH THE PARK BOARD: { a. Park Board Members Present: Steve Slabaugh, Chairman; Board k members: Marianne Bither, Carolyn De Frang, Jeff Hepler, Suzanne f Schrag, and Shel Scolar. i b. Chair Slabaugh updated Council on work completed by the Park Board on the park levy project priority list.. He noted the Park Board had held a series of meetings with several citizen groups to determine if there was support in the community for a park levy. ! Chair Slabaugh reviewed the projects on the priority list for s Summerlake Park. He noted the bridge at the dam had been reduced to a four-foot wide pedestrian bridge. There had been some discussion on whether or not to include restrooms; after review, the Board felt restrooms were a necessary improvement. 4 There was a question on necessity of pathway lighting. The infrastructure (i.e. culverts for wiring at a later date) were the only items provided with regard to lighting. It was noted that until the park was fully developed, there would not be a lot of evening use of the park. Jeff Hepler reviewed the Cook Park project priority list. Major items included: Development of the riverfront area, relocation of the roads, and planting grass areas to open up more of the Park for recreational activities. Councilor Eadon noted the ballfields at Cook Park were not addressed at this time. C Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1989 There was discussion on the irrigation equipment and the fact that it may need to be moved at a later date should other improvements be necessary. Chair Slabaugh noted that future improvements to the park were probably five to six years in the future; irrigation in the interim was necessary. ! There was brief discussion on lighting and the possibility that a { few vapor lights might be a viable proposal. 1 Shel Scolar reviewed the Fanno Creek project priority list. Mr. Scolar noted the list had been pared down because of other tE plans being developed in conjunction with City Center development }r plans. Councilor Johnson noted concern that the west end of the park had not been identified for right-of-way acquisition. After lengthy discussion, council consensus was that funds could be set aside in the Fanno Creek Park allocation for land acquisition; however, exact locations would not be specified. f r Board member De Frang reviewed the greenways and bike paths project priority list. She referred to a map which illustrated where bike paths would be constructed or improved. While reviewing the Durham Road/Cook Park connection, it was noted that a portion of the bike path along 108th Avenue extended beyond the city boundary. City Attorney advised he would review will review f whether levy funds can be used for areas outside the city limits. An analysis of the C proposed park levy with regard to millage rate r and total funds available, was distributed for Council review. Councilor Eadon requested Council consider approving a levy p; amount of 23 cents per $1,000 of assessed value for five or more years. s. F Mayor reviewed with the Park Board the possibility that Council ` may combine improvements to the Senior Center with the park levy. He advised this had not been discussed with persons from the Senior Citizen Center; however, he wanted to get ask the Park Board their opinion of this proposal. f' Park Board Chair Slabaugh commented he could see where this combination could be beneficial. He advised the drawback was that this would be a more expensive item on the ballot for voters to consider. Board member Hepler requested the issue be reviewed more k:,: thoroughly. He said adding the Senior Citizen Center to the levy could create some confusion and perhaps jeopardize future recreational and youth programs needed in the community. Mayor Edwards advised comments from the Park Board would be x reviewed by Council. He also noted there would be several tax issues on the September ballot which could affect the outcome of the proposed park levy. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1989 . i ' i f After discussion, council consensus was to support a proposed park levy in the amount of 23 cents per $1,000 of assessed value' for five years. It was further noted the allocation for Sumnerlake Park and Cook Park would remain as proposed. Fanno Creek Park allocation would remain at the total dollar level proposed by the Park Board. Funding priority would be given to the bicycle paths, foot bridge, and meadow plantings. An amount would be set aside for Fanno Creek Park land acquisition. There was discussion of studying a proposal to schedule completion of projects over a three-year while being paid for over five years. i Board member Hepler noted the excellent assistance from City E; staff; especially, Senior Planner Newton. He also expressed f, appreciation for City Council's support. Councilor Eadon thanked fellow Councilors for their willingness k to reconsider the dollar amount in the proposed levy. 4 Adjournment: 8:40 p.m. Approved by the Tigard City Council on (~i 1989. Ccc~ze.u~ Gc' ~-e-lc►.~.C~ Deputy Recorder - City of Tig d ATTEST: - City of Ti `a d Council President cp/0103D j } Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1989 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 N,)tlce 7-6987 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice P. 0. Box 23397 • Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit • e AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ass. I, Dortha Marty being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the T i cla r rl T I mew a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the City Council Meeting a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for One successive and consecutive in the following issues: June 15, 1989 Subscribe sworn before me this 16th of June, 1989 ry Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 9/20/92 AFFIDAVIT ; The following seleL'fed';ey ada it at cpu_ d for your information Further InformaSotl So bt~talned from the City Recor -;A& , 13Y25 SW FiallBt ;<1h 923'of by calling 634172 jCT1 X COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING .DUNE 19,41989y , i s 5 O P1VI Study. Meetirtg} r x Y, TIGARD CIVICCENTER, TOWN BALL a L13125 SW HALL BOULEVAm T~G`P► -6 OR~CON f x 4 4 - t 1 .111 L .ic %17~-_7 } • Worltshop Meeting with ParDr 1;oartE Plan Discussiofr on City Center il • Executive Session unde ~tpe prov3sio of 0'R"192 BlIO}'~& ~:d a u` M O'cu suss o~fce G lief lcctio tlons,`real p r " C" ` Hans, and curren~ancl