Loading...
City Council Packet - 01/23/1989 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA CATV sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, JANUARY 23, 1989, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 6:30 o STUDY SESSION 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 3. KEYS TO THE CITY: RECOGNITION OF CITIZEN CRIME STOPPERS - BRIAN D. THOMAS AND JOEL R. GRIFFIN. o Mayor 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes - December 19, 1988 and January 9, 1989 4.2 Approve Board & Committee Appointments (NPO's) - Res. No. 89- 4.3 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board Meeting (LCRB): a. Authorize Expenditure for Bridge Major Maintenance b. Authorize Purchase of 2 Patrol Units-Police Dept. Patrol Div. Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4.4 Accept Final Engineer's Report for the 79th Avenue Streetlighting Local Improvement District; Accept Assessment Roll; Direct Notice be Given and Direct a Public Hearing be Held - Res. No. 89- 4.5 Accept Getty's Emerald Acres Subdivision Public Improvements - Resolution No. 89- 4.6 Accept Penn Lawn Estates No. 2 Subdivision Public Improvements - Resolution No. 89- 5. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARKS MASTER PLANS-RESOLUTION NO. 89- 5 Community Development Staff 6. CONSIDERATION OF POLICY STATEMENT FOR SINGLE-OWNER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FORMATION - Resolution No. 89- 0 Community Development Staff 7. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF TIME GUIDELINES IN SECTION 18.30.030 OF TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (NESBITT ASSOCIATES, INC.) o Community Development Staff 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10. ADJOURNMENT cw%8433D COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 23, 1989 - PAGE 1 J.I T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 - 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Pat Reilly, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police; Jill Monley, Community Services Director; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESSION a. Council and staff reviewed items for consideration on the calendar and agenda topics for the business meeting. City Engineer noted some residents may request Bancroft funding for their share of the 79th Avenue Streetlighting Local Improvement District assessment. He advised that staff would review this situation for possible alternatives to meet the residents' financing needs. Council and staff reviewed Agenda Item No. 5 (Consideration of Acceptance of Parks Master Plans). After discussion, consensus was that the wording in the ordinance was premature and it would be more appropriate for Council to accept the Parks Master Plans by motion. Staff clarified that the Parks Master Plans would be presented to the public for review and comments. After public information was received and incorporated into the Plans, the Parks Master Plans would be submitted to Council for formal adoption. b. Hampton Court - Alarm Problem: Chief of Police noted three false alarms had been reported for this complex. He advised that after the fourth false alarm, penalty fees could be assessed; the manager had been formally notified in writing. C. Tigard Marketplace - Community Development Director reported the developer planned to install a condenser unit inside the building and remove the rooftop unit. Outside noise should then be eliminated thus solving the problems experienced by the adjacent neighborhood. d. 135th Avenue Local Improvement District - City Engineer advised that residents of several homes adjacent to recent road improvements (135th Avenue LID) have requested vegetation screening be planted. The improved road elevations are such that the road runs above their back property line. After discussion, Council consensus was to permit the property owners to plant and maintain vegetation screening in the right-of-way. It was noted that the City would replace any plantings removed for road maintenance in the future. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 e. Scholls Ferry Road Improvements - The City Engineer reported that the Oregon Department of Transportation sponsored a hearing on January 19. Road improvements for Scholls Ferry Road (approximately from Fanno Creek to west of SW 125th Avenue) were scheduled for construction during 1990-91. f. City Center Development - Community Development Director reviewed upcoming events and distributed a timeline for council review. (The timeline has been filed with the Council packet material.) He noted staff met with the NPOs last week to explain possible action and answer questions. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the timeline with Council, noting some of the steps were required by state statute. A creation of a City Center Agency would be necessary; this agency would consist of members of Council. One set of criteria outlined for use of tax increment financing was set forth in terms describing an area of "blight." To qualify, an area must demonstrate problems with traffic circulation, access, mix of land use, and parceling of land. Senior Planner Newton noted a variety of funding options would be considered including tax increment financing. City Attorney advised that any areas identified for potential condemnation proceedings should be clearly identified on a map. It was noted that Jolynn Ash and Bill Monahan have resigned from the City Center Plan Task Force. F 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA: a. Dr. Gene Davis, 10875 SW 89th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, requested that the Council motion which tabled the 93rd Avenue Local Improvement District proposal be extended for another three months. Below is a recap of prior action: This item had been considered by Council on September 12, 1988. At that time City Engineer advised there was substantial opposition to the LID and reconunended that the City not proceed with LID consideration as a City-sponsored action. Concern had been expressed with the proposed method of assessment as well as testimony from residents who opposed formation of the LID. City Engineer recommended the proponents be given until January 23, 1989, to restructure the LID boundary and assessment method. The Council, by motion, approved the tabling of the proposal to a date not later than January 23, 1989. David Blake, 5725 Charles Circle, Lake Oswego, testified he was in favor of extending the deadline for up to three months to allow more time for proponents to prepare material for a possible hearing on the 93rd Avenue LID. Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 Ron Mills, 10620 SW 95th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon, testified in favor of extending the deadline. John S. Blomgren, 9460 SW Oak Street, Tigard, Oregon, testified he was opposed to formation of a 93rd Avenue LID. Community Development Director recommended favorable consideration to the request to extend the deadline. He advised there was a potential for significant development in this area. Discussion followed. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to grant an extension to March 27, 1989, to allow more time for the proponents to gather information necessary for consideration of whether to hold a public hearing for a 93rd Avenue LID. Discussion on the motion: It was noted staff time spent on this proposal had been and would continue to be minimal. Councilor Schwartz requested that Council be provided with maps delineating the request. Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 4. KEYS TO THE CITY a. Mayor Edwards rioted that Brian D. Thomas and Joel R. Griffin witnessed a purse snatching at a local shopping center. The two heard the pleas of the victim for help and chased the suspect through the parking lot. Griffin stopped the suspect and held him until police arrived. Thomas retrieved the victim's purse and returned it to her. The grateful victim told police that $100 in cash and the purse's contents were returned intact. The suspect was arrested and charged with Theft II. Police credit Thomas and Griffin for the apprehension and the assistance at the scene that led to the arrest of the suspect and the return of the victim's property. The efforts of Thomas and Griffin exemplify the successful partnership between citizens and police in a fight against crime in Tigard. Mayor presented to Mr. Thomas and Mr. Griffin a "Key to the City" and expressed appreciation for their assistance. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to: 5.1 Approve Council Minutes - December 19, 1988 and January 9, 1989 5.2 Approve Board & Committee Appointments (NPO's) - Resolution No. 89-06 5.3 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board Meeting (LCRB): a. Authorize Expenditure for Bridge Major Maintenance b. Authorize Purchase of 2 Patrol Units--Police Department Patrol Division Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 5.4 Accept Final Engineer's Report for the 79th Avenue Streetlighting Local Improvement District; Accept Assessment Roll; Direct Notice be Given and Direct a Public Hearing be Held - Resolution No. 89-07 5.5 Accept Getty's Emerald Acres Subdivision Public Improvements - Resolution No. 89-08 5.6 Accept Penn Lawn Estates No. 2 Subdivision Public Improvements - Resolution No. 89-09 The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 6. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARKS MASTER PLAN a. Community Development Director summarized. On July 25, 1988, the Council approved a contract with Murase and Associates to prepare a master plan for the three city-wide parks: Cook, Fanno Creek, and Summerlake. On December 5, 1988, the consultants presented their recommendation to the Council in a joint workshop with the Park and Recreation Board. On December 21, 1988, the Park and Recreation Board reviewed the written narrative. A copy of the written narrative was submitted to Council in their meeting packet. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the highlights of the suggestions for the three major parks as outlined in the material prepared by the consultant. Senior Planner Newton advised that the Park Board would be presenting these Master Plans to the public through a series of meetings. The Council would consider formal adoption of the Master Plans once public input had been incorporated. Councilor Johnson commented that a great deal of time had been spent by Park Board members in developing these Plans. She thanked Park Board members and Councilor Eadon (liaison to the Park Board) for their work. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to accept the Parks Master Plans with the understanding that Council would review the Master Plans for formal adoption after receipt of public input. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 7. CONSIDERATION OF POLICY STATEMENT FOR SINGLE-OWNER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FORMATION a. Community Development Director summarized. This item was discussed at the December 12, 1988, Council meeting, at which time council decided to consider single-owner local improvement districts under certain circumstances. Those circumstances included the demonstration of "public purpose," which could include the creation of new jobs, and a demonstration of minimum risk to the City. E, Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 After discussion, Council consensus was that the proposed resolution should be modified. A concern to Council was that the resolution should clearly note that this wording was to allow an exception to Council policy of discouraging single-owner local improvement districts. Council noted the resolution should reflect that financed improvements would be limited to 25 percent of the appraised value of the land (excluding structures) before public improvements. Community Development Director advised staff would prepare a redraft of the resolution as a Consent Item on a future Council Agenda. 8. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF TIME GUIDELINES IN SECTION 18.30.030 OF TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (NESBITT ASSOCIATES, INC.) a. Community Development Director noted Council had approved a waiver of deadline for submission of application materials for comprehensive plan change on September 12, 1988, as requested by Nesbitt Associates. For several reasons, Nesbitt Associates was unable to proceed with the comprehensive plan change and missed the October hearing. The current (and previous) request was for a comprehensive plan change for a 3,700 square foot parcel (swimming pool at Golden Key Apartments) of land between the Embassy Suites Hotel and the Golden Key Apartments. Nesbitt Associates would like to purchase the parcel and incorporate it into their plans for an office-building. Community Development Director noted that Nesbitt Associates hoped to begin construction in late March. The subject 3,700 square foot piece of land would significantly impact the building configuration. Community Development Director recommended Council waive the normal time elements outlined in Section 18.30.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code which would allow staff to schedule this request for the next available Planning Commission meeting. He advised he did not feel this would be a precedent-setting action should Council decide to waive the timeline since this was a very small parcel of land in terms of comprehensive planning. He noted the need for the property owner to proceed as quickly as possible citing the approaching construction season as a predominant factor for requesting the waiver of timeline. In response to a question by councilor Schwartz, Community Development Director advised he was not aware of any controversial issues with regard to this request. He noted surrounding property owners would be notified as a part of the process. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve the request of Nesbitt Associates for a waiver of time guidelines in Section 18.30.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Councilor Johnson noted the Second Annual Fanno Creek Conference was scheduled for February 25, 1989. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION a. The Tigard City Council went into executive session at 8:26 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), and (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 11. ADJOURNMENT: 9:40 p.m. Approved by the Tigard city council on 1989. 1 Deputy Recorder - City of Ti and ATTEST, Mayor - City o Tigard cw/8939D Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 23, 1989 a COUNCIL MEETING UPDATE - JANUARY 23, 1989 o STUDY SESSION Calendar & Agenda Review Tigard Marketplace - CDD reported developer plans to install condenser inside building and remove rooftop unit; outside noise should be eliminated. Hampton Court - Alarm problem - COP noted 3 false alarms have been reported; after fourth false alarm penalty fees can be assessed; manager has been notified 135th Avenue LID - several houses located adjacent to recent road improvements to LID have requested vegetation screening since the road sets up above their ppty line. CC consensus was to permit ppty owners to plant and maintain screening in the right-of-way. Scholls Ferry Road Improvements - City Engr reported ODOT had hearing on 1/19; improvements on Scholls Ferry approximately from Fanno Creek to west of S.W. 125th scheduled for construction season 1990-91. City Center Development - CDD reviewed upcoming events and distributed timeline for CC review. Staff met with NPO's last week to explain possible action and answer question. 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call - All CC Present 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA - Gene Davis, David Blake & Ron Mills requested 93rd Ave LID process be kept vital and asked for extension to meet requirements for request of a public hearing. John Blomgren noted he was opposed to the potential 93rd Ave. LID. Sc/Jo - Motion to extend deadline for consideration of holding public hearing on 93rd Ave LID to 3/27/89 to allow interested persons more time to gather material/information. UA 3. KEYS TO THE CITY: RECOGNITION OF CITIZEN CRIME STOPPERS - BRIAN D. THOMAS AND JOEL R. GRIFFIN. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes - December 19, 1988 and January 9, 1989 4.2 Approve Board & Committee Appointments (NPO's) - Res. No. 89-06 4.3 Recess Council Meeting; Convene Local Contract Review Board Meeting (LCRB): a. Authorize Expenditure for Bridge Major Maintenance b. Authorize Purchase of 2 Patrol Units-Police Dept. Patrol Div. Adjourn LCRB; Reconvene Council Meeting 4.4 Accept Final Engineer's Report- for the 79th Avenue Streetlighting Local Improvement District; Accept Assessment Roll; Direct Notice be Given and Direct a Public Hearing be Held - Res. No. 89-07 4.5 Accept Getty's Emerald Acres Subdivision Public Improvements - Resolution No. 89-08 4.6 Accept Penn Lawn Estates No. 2 Subdivision Public Improvements - Resolution No. 89-09 (over) COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 23, 1989 - PAGE 1 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal. P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notlce 7-6814 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 0 ❑ Tearsheet Notice CITY OF TIGARD JAN 9,7 I ,PO BOX 23397 0 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 2`? 9 TIGARD, OR 97223 ~t 8~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' 1, ELAINE PETROGEORGE being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the TIGARD TIMES a newspaper of. general circulatior~Ias8fined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at I UH in the aforesaid county and state; that the CITY GOUPICIL MEETING a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: JAN. 19, 1989 Subscri wdsworn to ore me this N. 20, 1989 Na Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 9/ 20/92 AFFIDAVIT ` ARol YN . d ccepinnew'd ^g w 5. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARKS MASTER PLANS Sc/Jo - Motion to accept Parks Master Plans with understanding CC will review for final adoption after public input has been received. UA 6. CONSIDERATION OF POLICY STATEMENT FOR SINGLE-OWNER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT" FORMATION CC consensus to add to proposed resolution wording to clearly note this was an exception to CC's general policy of discouraging single-owner LID`s; also resolution should reflect that financed improvements would be limited to 25% of the appraised value of the land (excluding structures) before public improvements. Staff to redraft resolution and schedule as Consent Agenda item at future CC meeting. 7. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF TIME GUIDELINES IN SECTION 18.30.030 OF TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (NESBITT ASSOCIATES, INC.) Sc/Jo - Motion to approve request for waiver of time guidelines. UA 8. NON.-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff Jo noted 2nd Annual Fanno Creek Conference scheduled for 2/25/89. 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 8:26 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10. ADJOURNMENT: 9:40 p.m. cw/8433D c COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 23, 1989 - PAGE 2 6,~ GCc 5-e.55i cM - CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TIMELINE w es ux 65; DATE WHAT WHO January 23 Update/Status Report - Timeline City Council and Products. Staff January 26 Review 2nd Draft Design Concept CCPTF Plan, Review 1st Draft City Ctr. Consultants Development Plan. February 1 Review 2nd Draft City Center Dev. CCPTF Plan. Consultants February 3 Presentation - Design Concept CCPTF v Plan, Release City Center Dev. Consultants 7-vwh flan draft to Public - BREAKFAST. February 7 Presentation - City Center Dev. CCPTF Plan Draft to Planning Commission Consultants WORKSHOP. P.C., Staff February 9 Discussion - Public comment on CCPTF City Center Development Plan. Staff February 13 Consider formation of City Center City Council Development Agency. CCPTF, Staff February 14 Present City Center Development CCPTF Plan - SUMMERFIELD. Staff February 21 Planning Commission consideration Plann. Comm. Adoption of Final Order - recommend CCPTF City Council adopt City Center Dev. Staff Plan. February 27 First Hearing on Ordinance to adopt City Council City Center Development Plan. CCPTF R-eadi March 6 Second 1 glon Ordinance to adopt City Council City Center Development Plan. CCPTF January 11, 1989 City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Subj: Audible Burglar Alarm 6950 S. W. Hampton (Hampton Square) Tigard, Oregon Attn: City Council Members We, the signatories below, hereby file a complaint with the City of Tigard concerning the audible burglar alarm system at the above mentioned address. This alarm continually goes-off. It sounds seven days per week, any time during a 24-hour period, and it is sometimes three to four times per day. The alarm has a very high decible sound, and we live from one-half to four blocks away. It is a real nuisance to have the alarm blaring off at 11:00 pm, 2:00 am, and 4:00 am - let alone day and night during the weekend. When the alarm goes off, we have timed it to be from 10 to 60 minutes before someone comes to the site and turns it off. The alarm system presently does not go through an alarm company nor the Police Department. We, the signatories on the attachment, expect a written letter from the City Council as to what the finding are.and what is going to be done about this nuisance. This situation'is intolerable! Sincerely yours, SIGNATORIES Attachment - Signatories cc: Mayor, City of Tigard Bonnie Hayes, Chairman, Washington County Commissioner 'n-o s3 NAME SIGNA'7URE SIGNATURE C=2 ADDRESS -7 oz s S.t.J. 6 ot-t ~a6,A ADDRESS WE (PRINT) -JoA/ DE ~~an/ NAME (PRINT)_S(/~1 SIGNATURE SIGNATURE ADDRESS 7070 Sa) 6roNZA61-~- ADDRESS o~ Q _S. InJ • - NAME (PRINT) M .A (XRc Sha ~~~.s NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE (~C ~Sjlq, SIGNATURE ADDRESS ADDRESS NAME (PRINT) f~ OZ, • ,G . I Q NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE SIGNATURE ADDRESS ~77 ADDRESS NAME (PRINT) NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE R, 77 S^ ~`I -SIGNATURE ADDRESS ADDRESS 'AME (PRINT) NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE SIGNATURE ADDRESS ADDRESS NAME (PRINT) C.V\R (I CS p e NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE SIGNATURE ADDRESS ADDRESS NAME (PRINT) ~GNfJ b ~LA-t NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE C.Q~ n SIGNATURE ADDRESS / (o 5 S ADDRESS NAME (PRINT ~p~` ( I NAIVE (PRINT) SIGNATUREC SIGNATURE ADDRESS ADDRESS AME (PRINT) L /tU,c /V R, I3RA I Nu Rb NAP,,IE (PRINT) SIGNATURE G~/I~~-rL SIGNATURE ADDRESS / ~C S. L-If . ADDRESS AGENDA ITEM N - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED t G-2 ~ ((~a ~ ~ s ©S>s~ S c~ $ 9~ ~ 3v! ~~"1~ ~o~ ~~y ^w~ s~i 7v ~k7w 2? 2/ Z lip J r i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Januar 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: January 6, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Reco nitionf PREVIOUS ACTION: None of Citizen Crime Sto ers PREPARED BY: Crime Prevention Specialist" DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY: Patrol Division Commander - POLICY ISSUE Should the City recognize with Keys'~to the City, citizens who come to the aid of a crime victim and assist police in the apprehension of suspects? a. INFORMATION SUMMARY k. On October 24, 1988 at approximately 3 p.m., Brian D. Thomas, 17, of Tigard, and Joel R. Griffin, 28, of Beaverton witnessed a purse-snatching at a local shopping center. The two heard the pleas of the victim for help and chased the suspect through the parking lot. Griffin stopped the suspect and held him` until police arrived. Thomas retrieved the victim's purse and returned it to her. The grateful victim told police that $100 in cash and all of the purse's° contents were returned intact. The suspect was arrested and charged with.' Theft II. Police credit Thomas and Griffin for the apprehension and the r. assistance at the scene that led to the arrest of the suspect and the return i` of the victim's property. The efforts of Thomas and Griffin exemplify the successful partnership between citizens and police in the fight against crime t. in Tigard. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Presentation of Keys to the City by the Mayor at a City Council meeting. 2. Official recognition by the Chief of Police and/or the City Manager. 3. Do nothing. FISCAL IMPACT I None. F'. 2 c SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends adoption of alternative 1#1, presentation of Keys to the City by the Mayor at a city Council meeting. sb/8069D i i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 DATE SUBMIT-TED: January 13, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA 'TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: Board and Committee Appointments > :/'PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK i/ REQUESTED BY: Appointments Advisory Com. POL CY ISSUE Neighborhood Planning Organization A pointments. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee met on November 30, and December 8, 1988, to interview 20 citizens who are interested in appointment to a city advisory committee. The Planning Commission reviewed these Neighborhood Planning Organization appointment recommendations at their January 10, 1989 meeting and have ratified the committees recommendations. At this time the following are recommended for appointment to their respective N.P.O.: NPO APPOINTMENTS TERM EXPIRES 1-2 Linda Sexton 12/31/92 5 Mary Burdan 12/31/92 Wendi Hawley 12/31/92 6 Ken Gotlib 12/31/92 Stephanie Mitchell 12/31/92 Lisa Schmitt 12/31/92 7 Frank Becker 12/31/92 James Boylan 12/31/92 Richard Kronewitter 12/31/92 Larry McGlinchy 12/31/92 8 Marilyn Hartzell 12/31/92 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Appointment of those individuals listed above. 2. Do not appoint any of the individuals listed above. 3. Appointment of selected individuals listed above. FISCAL IMPACT Not Applicable SUGGESTED ACTION Recommend alternative #1, to support the Appointments Advisory Committee and Planning Commission recommendations listed above. dc:8353D CRYOFTIVARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: r n e. X ~n vl DATE: g $8 ADDRESS (RES.): 9870 &U). mcJrpn 1, Q,-ga RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (sus.): _910a S.(~. NAaIAT.,?iU & ~j a~S BUS. PHONE: RY-/SO-_ LENGTH OF' RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: a, ~a AlOrlfli~, SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Spa rla as EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Orvj - M~rrr,r iLSr rJP~S d taL OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: .p J - e s HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH-THIS FIRM? yy10, IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? _tEVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ('nyu T Y~ r711~r~ ; /e C i) rl7i %bvj i /98~ - /98S ORGANIZATIONS AND'OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): e Q u / - GY! 77-' t^P_ma',noJ 'to CT-Pd uqt J -11t, ~hd dPyne 11 ir.- farm,, BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: fj~v A~~~snrv f3~r~a OM e=az'#~'es At 'W'e Date received at City Hall• I - 4- Q $ Date Interviewed Date Appointed. Board, Committee, or NPO A12 n 1 - 1 Inside City X Aj P dL Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Rvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CI YOF T167ARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME : / G 4 DATE : .7- 11-11 ADDRESS (RES.): RES. PHONE:- y0-2,6 ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: .G~~~, 58~~ LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: '7yl~r SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ED CATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL S ATUS AND BACKGRO HOW LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH HIS FIRM? - " IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? 3 . VIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVI >Lae= Ole ORGANIZATIONS A OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (G REMARKS): BOARDS, COMM ACT S O INTERESTED IN- 04- Date received at City Hall 7- 1.12 -8 F Date Interviewed Date Appointed X A/00 *,S' Board, Committee, or NPO Al o Q S Inside City Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 RECEIVED O ACT 98988 RECEIVED CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: WENDI C. HAWLEY DATE: OCDDBER 17th, 1988 ADDRESS (RES.): 14790 SW 79th RES. PHONE: 620-5056 ADDRESS (BUS.): 14790 SW 79th BUS. PHONE: 620-5056 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: life minus three yrs. SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Schooled in Tigard; at PSU (2 yrs.) .OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Owner/ManaQer, HAWLEY CONSTRUCTION, 8 yrs; Office Manager for WARDMARK C0: 1980; concurrently employed by SSd. Landscaping. HOW.LONG.HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? HAWLEY CONSTRUCTION'8 yrs, S&L 9 mos. IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN-YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? .EVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: -Uniform Director, Tigard Little League', 3 yrs; Active in i the fight to save and expand Durham School; Educational volunteer at Durham, 2 years; artiva in PSf) ftmrlraiGarc•~.€,c~nnA--aetfWj-cis H,p Firct Min-rb of Mrict. gr-jentist. TilZard ovei ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: .Former Board member, First Church of Christ, Scientist, Tigard; Board of Directors, Tigard Little League; Member, American Diabetes Assn; All-City Choir, Tigard; OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): I have a good working knowledge of the need for I have. planning; experience in working with zoning requirements, HOA's, and other groups of adults; my background-in construction and business is substantial,, decision-making from . a position of .responsibility is-familiar-as I help manage 6 employees BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Planning Commission Date received at City Hall _/0 -7U d 8 Date Interviewed l a Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO AJ ~ C Inside City ~K N P00',5 Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CITY®F TIFARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: Ken Gotlib DATE: 11-10-88 ADDRESS (RES.): 8835 S.W. Scheckla Drive RES. PHONE: 639-8111 ADDRESS (BUS.): Same BUS. PHONE: 620-4782 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 2-1/2 months SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? New Jersey, Eugene, OR and Los Angeles EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDi .3 yrs. U of O Political Science OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND -BACKGROUND:. Sales Management: -•-Regional -S?Lles Manager of medical instrument-distribution. Responsible for sales representatives t. and a 2 to 3 million dollar sales budget. HOW LONG 'HAVE- YOU BEEN . EMPLOYED WITH. THIS FIRM? 6 years IS THIS COMPANY: LOCATED.-.-WITHIN YOUR NPO -AREA (NPO' APPLICANTS 0NLY)?. • No' PREVIOUS :COMMUNITY. ACTIVITK.: None ORGANI7.ATIONS AND OFFICES: :None OTHER INFORMATION GENERAL,-RBMARRS):. Considering the fact that I am new. to the area, I would like 'to' get involved. with the community, and feel that the Citizen Committee would be the best way to get'started. BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: .Planning; budget Date received at City.Hall • Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO V P0 Inside City P Q Outside City i _ i cs/4772A i 13125 SW Hall Blvd.. P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 . r F CITY OF TIFA R® CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: Stephanie J. Mitchell DATE: October 24, 1988 ADDRESS (RES.): 9335 SW View Terrace RES. PHONE: 684-1984 ADDRESS (BUS.): Evaluation Dept. PPS, 501 N Dixon, Portland, OR BUS. PHONE: 249-2000 x238 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 24 rears SUGGESTED BY: Tom Brien, Town Hall Mtg WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Gresham, OR"t Minneapolis, MN EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:_M.A. Educational Administration, University of Minnesota, 1980; B.i. Child Psychology, Univ. of MN., 1976; College of St. Benedict, ..1966-68 OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Educatinnal Program Evaluator. Portland Public Schools, 315 yrs.': Trainer/Technical Assistance Coordinator, Univ. of MR., 9 yrs ; Teacher, 8 yrs HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS'FIRM? Pn tland Public Schools - 3' years IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN. YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? No .EVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY; _Co-chair, Neighborhood Block Club, Minneapolis, MN 1980-85' c -Precinct Delegate, 1975-81; Delegate to'City Conventions, 1977-80.- ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: American Educational Research Association' Portland'Association of Central Administrative Personnel OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): I would like to work with my NPO on Planning issues. for the future development of our neighborhood and community BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: NPn (brit T f6rgnt t1,a mimhPri) i Date received at City Hall //11,~h0j Date Interviewed. Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO ) Inside City Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 i CITY OF TIGA RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: 1.1t5A A. I-1 eT 1 DATE: I ~2" -S8 ADDRESS (RES 17, 5('J A'ypJV / U/~ qrJ 4 RES. PHONE: Vigo(' _85 ADDRESS (BUS.): IZQ:54-\/ h-N (U_, Sf-~IGD /fib j5BUS. PHONE: 22 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIG :_'5(-h(y_ V tQ1e 87 SUGGESTED BY: UCr4t EA6LE7 f6f, WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? F)!~AM 1 N &Yp/jjQ EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: t~ ~ `~QMM~ ~L1fJ 1 ~ j91 , OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: I c , • HOW LONG HAVE Y 6U BE ' EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? _51 I'1 C~ &(;6_j_85 IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN~YJUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? C :REVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: Q 111 fG)_A-0 L A16V TV Q a ORGANIZATIONS AND "OFFICES : o J4/ OTHER I? FORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): L r461- 1L A• WAA.1 w /y 10 BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: /v d ( f: V Nrvi or N PO Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed 1 ;Z( Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO AZ Q Inside City X Al p 0 ""19 Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 ~F C11 YOF T11FA D CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: l"~C''i34/Y~ /~'f ~~i~~~C~~'~•C~i~ DATE: ADDRESS (RES.) RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): /~o3o?O S.~ BUS. PHONE: ~po?0-~~D LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND : OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: /97/- a/c. X987- ~ecs~~~` SOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? / 44,dWe ~f'/JJQ IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? /Yd XVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS 'AND OFFICES : s ~0~~9iJ~c~.E - 7:~9,~d/ '~~i~►s~5 D~"~5 ~~io~''0~1/l1~i~~ OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) : 4::;r1;V" ,riy ee - BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed { M~~ Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO 11 ] Inside City /U pn-'&`1 Outside City r 1. cs/4772A_ 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Bar, 2397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-:4171 t CITYOF T1 ARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: J I DATE: q -I- ADDRESS (RES.): s, g, "-RI RES. PHONE: ~Q'Z(D-fit ADDRESS (BUS.): u'a BUS. PHONE: 'zZ$=12.Z8 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: ~►,e~rS SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE. PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND-. c ~S 1 1`~4~ ~ ~[]r o ~ 21a HOW LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH TH IRM?1 ~ S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPL S ONLY)? , p .EVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: lt~~~~ - a ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Date received at City Hall_ Date Interviewed I Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO k) e o -7 Inside City X U r o 7 Outside City cs/4772A 13125 M11 call Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CITYOF T167ARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME= iZIGI-tN~~'~ ( 2lGK, 1 1'~P~c~r.SEW` ITTFR. DATE: t2-'-$$ ADDRESS (RES.): k ZfjO !S S LO:. 1Jf7t?TH 7 i4 t~C~ ilk 5G~°f RES. PHONE: (o -K~~(t^, ADDRESS (BUS.)-. J[325 S, W . CiA0 VO0 j gam! BUS. PHONE: (1,t {(t, - c ti. t q LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 5 044 0. SUGGESTED BY: = y t!S tQY_b y WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? S.E . pTLU KAA,&. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: or U- (ir3n(%r V'-'W OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND.BACKGROUND: I9 ~f 5 - C.U Rt2C t~~ K/F~a-P~ Ci~4 P~PE~$ S ~'~`S tagt-i BURtEzIJ 4 $ DU V[ ff Nv GtiYtc9yPS yrr~t~t~E,f-~ Cwt SS' •C1.S . ~ ~30TC~ C31(.C.. f [U lYT t~~["i V`EC i 6T~_ HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 3 `lt2S IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED.WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? 1lf© PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: jaG'K-XV & t hj -r(1-)Q CAVL2Pf°EfC-=QS ,,~AA.-''~C~ C St~+~~~-+st- ' R/L~-',[ C.Y•'~D r~rr-cl ast~ 1+0-bat 1Py~"nn~ C-t P'.04N-F W 5~~~/t)~7NC~ST 71 V_ZC_J r`G[v 1 e ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: _OPC-C-,,<)j-3 fit= C00SC--2tliq'ttGN -BL-) i2 tJ t<V4 cwt C3 . A'C--t P_C C _ hS - V ch~'~ e,~~bRQr I~ r-} ht' p ICJ c t . ~ ~ .L fa , 1 Ej~ QSt= l`J . W , - - [4G'~ t l/~ ylitC-tti~t t?,~r(Z S~~ tGES PC p.~ OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): 'Q-i+ t fZ 9F~S f fJ F C3 P,Ti-(t' t rz,_ mtr Y c (aV _C ( lGc~ZT<-- Tt C~ t~-f~b at-~--IER (fU PC3 ' i. i4-yt~l oP(I~ t~~ t~-'~C.Z~ u.9~ f2t-G LcSc_,L L W (TT4 (7IV-6-RS r F4-t~~ f=Q_~t ~C~~ ~N.t2Cr~UC-2 f~f BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: N PO Date received at City Hall ~Sf Date Interviewed A,Iks 7 Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Al nC) 7 Inside City _0 PC, Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hail Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CITYOF T1~AR® CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: LARRY T •MCGLW(:H Y DATE: (v 28 ADDRESS (RES.): 1155(0 S.W. SHF-PFIEL6 Ck• RES. PHONE: (,III-9'f31 ADDRESS (BUS.): 3F01 S.W. M U,RXA4 BLVD BEANE--TOAI BUS. PHONE: (o(fl-3151 )(184K LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 3 • YEAts SUGGESTED BY: WHEEKE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? gEAVERTOfV EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: 3eccRe p- (5F -Sawc.E, CoMPaW- '5Q&-JGF FACM 13'4IGIiAdl YOU.NV UNIVRSITY OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: S0FTWA9-,--- lIF~•~ FLOAT- /AJ6 P,Nr 5~! STEM S , .LNG . Fd T!f-E PREy/OU5 S YEi42s HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? $ J/EA-,Q5 S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN- YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? ND REVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: NOrVE ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: TF~4CUSIZ IN REU6JOa5 1Ajer "Cn0^j YOr,GTFf- I.zM4e . 1A) 7bW- CAfuRcf-l- of c7asus C44t r-67= i4 Tr y ~ s•4~~vTS,/ ivtve•17v~ys 1 . OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): CONG60-AN ,O ~4$ULC~T Tlf' O9VALQ,10m6./r- _ OP 716 4~QD , J0Ke77CUC ,'W-(.Y 7HXC IMP1,0t-Y 6,oeofAJ.1, /G /V. W, CU.C~/~r~2 e -ZC iWOI.!" 4LsC-) LaK 7b FA7n11-1A21zzE X14 ifs ELF W/77 VtF- C/TY Q1Q 11eW N1n5 t1 r R~4 /Ts FUAJ,!f ll. BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: V)00 Date received at City Hall 7-/0-994 Date Interviewed ( a' Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO /V (90 Inside City X A) P0'-7 Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION GON NAME: TIIFAID C---- DATE: ADDRESS (RES. : 10„185 70 t- T; nat%d,4I)P-q :X3 RES. PHONE;_elS (D ~q~ f-j ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ~ /bno/LC ,.'S-.1 - EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Ce~A P o OCCUPATIONAI, STATUS AND BACKGRO : 6 A,, YW ~n --/oC,iif d l~tlcl tee' e" ftLW LCiL 1 ~n n n ~n .e..P Q~~ ~ r „cL~hr Qito[r '7i-t~.v ,y -fnr /3 Ueay~ 8`Ueeers HOW LONG HAVE YO BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? _Sy~1trS IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? tEVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ~ ~ N ~rn Nt~c.~ P ORGANIZATIONS AND'OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:„~.~ Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed /41 Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City ~k) P n Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hal! Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorization of PREVIOUS ACTION: Expenditure For Bridge Major Maintenance PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: OLI Y ISSUE Local Contract Review Board authorization is requested for expenditure of up to $45,000 for major maintenance of timber bridges. INFORMATION SUMMARY Bridge inspections last year revealed the need for some major maintenance work on the City's seven timber bridges. The 1988-89 Budget provides $60,000 for bridge major maintenance. The primary work required on the bridges is replacement of deteriorated timber railings and timber curbs on the older bridges. This maintenance work is required on seven (7) of our City bridges. It appears that the least expensive way to accomplish the repairs is to contract with Washington County. The work would be done by a maintenance crew that routinely performs similar work on timber bridges throughout the County. Because the County crew is well experienced in this particular maintenance activity, it appears that the cost would be far lower than if the work were to be done by City crews or by private contract. In addition, the County has access to a low cost source of the specialty materials required for railings on timber bridges. The County would charge us only the actual costs incurred by the County in accomplishing the repairs. The County has estimated that they could accomplish these repairs for us at a cost not to exceed $45,000. The remaining $15,000 in the budget for bridge repairs is for substantial repairs which may be required on the abutment of the Grant Street Bridge. The engineering staff is still evaluating the need for the abutment repairs and the best ways to accomplish them. It is likely that we would hire a private contractor to accomplish the abutment repairs. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Authorize the City Administrator to issue a purchase order authorizing Washington County to perform bridge major maintenance not to exceed $45,000. 2. Withhold authorization. FISCAL IMPACT $45,000 from the Streets CIP budget, Account Code 10-6130. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board, by motion, authorize the City Administrator to issue a purchase order to Washington County for bridge repair work not to exceed $45,000 br/8351D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: January 6, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Purchase of 2 PREVIOUS ACTION: patrol units for patrol division, PREPARED BY: Lt. Robert Wheeler DEPT HEAD OK' CITY ADMIN OKREQUESTED BY: Chief David Lehr E' PO ICY ISSUE Should council continue its policy of replacing equipment that presents safety hazards to its operator's. INFORMATION SUMMARY The police department is proposing to purchase two 1989 Chevrolet Caprice police units to replace two aged (6 years old) Malibu patrol units. The units to be replaced have 105,533 and 102,476 miles on their speedometers respectively. Both of these units are unsafe to drive because of excessive wear. The proposed purchase will be on-the State of Oregon contract with Russ Chevrolet and are the same make and model of our other units in the fleet. Sufficient funds have been budgeted and are available for this purchase. D ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Purchase the patrol units. 2. Not purchase the patrol units. FISCAL IMPACT 1. $25,458.00 2. -0- SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends the purchase of the 2 patrol units. RESOLUTION NO. 87- Page 1 s No. 04899 PURCHASE REQUISITION V.ASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DATE: January 5th,1989 TO: PURCHASING DEPARTMENT FROM: Lt. Robert Wheeler DEPT.: Police (patrol) 0 ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER ❑ GET PRICE / DELIVERY QUOTATIONS AND CALL ME WHEN THEY ARE RECEIVED AT EXTENSION ❑ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: SUGGESTED VENDORS : NAME :Department of General Services (Oregon) NAME ADDRESS : Purchasing Division ADDRESS : 1225 Ferry Street OR CITY :Salem, Grege A7~~0 CITY TELEPHONE TELEPHONE N: REQUIRED DATE: DELIVER TO: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT ESTIMATED REQUIRED NUMBER PRICE 2 Each 1989 Chevrolet Caprice (White) 8 C c. 4 Dr. Sed Patrol Units. @ $12,554.00 Police Package on State of Oregon Bid: Russ Chev Tigard Vendor 10-1120-703: 25,108.00 2 Each Undercoats for above units @ $45.00 90.00 2 Each Mudflaps for above units @ $55.00 10-1120-703:0 110.00 1 Each Shop Manuals for above listed Police Units @ 50.00 10-1120-703: 50.00 SUB-TOTAL:: 5,358.00 PLUS State service fee 100.00 Or) 00-1 i~o ESTIMATED. T• TAI. $25,458.00 APPROPRIATION BALANCE : $46,570.00 AS OF : 1/5/89 SIGNATURE .~9 y1~U, OQ U \PPROVALS : (UP TO $ *Rd 500.00) SECTION MANAGER Lte er PURCHASING A (IF OVER $500.01) DEPT. HEAD / PURCHASING AGENT (IF OVER $5000.01) DEPT. HEAD / PURCHASING AGENT / FINANCE DIRECTOR 0 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: January 11, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW 79th Avenue PREVIOUS ACTION: Streetli htin LID, setting the d&tq of final hearirAq PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole GG(~r DEPT HEAD OK CIl"Y ADMIN OK,; REQUESTED BY: POL CY ISSUE Setting the date for final hearing on SW 79th Avenue Streetlighting LID. INFORMATION SUMMARY All work is complete on the SW 79th Avenue Str•eetlighting LID. In order to close the LID, it is necessary for the Council to formally accept the final report and to set a date for a hearing to consider any objections to the final assessment roll. Staff recommends that the hearing be set for the regular Council business meeting of February 13, 1989. The final engineer's report is attached. Final assessments are less than had been estimated at the time of LID formation. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution accepting the final report and assessment roll; setting a hearing for February 13, 1989; and directing that notice of the hearing be given. 2. Direct that revisions be made to the report or to the assessment- roll. FISCAL IMPACT All costs are included in the LID assessment. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution, br/867QD FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT' FOR SW 79TH AVENUE STREETLIGHTING LID Background The SW 79th Avenue Streetlighting Local Improvement District (LID) was formed in October 1988, by Ordinance No. 88--29. The purpose of the LTD was the installation of street lights along SW 79th Avenue between Pfaffle and Thorn Streets. Construction The street lights were installed by Portland General Electric Company (PGE). All work was completed on October 28, 1988. Final Costs The final costs of the project are as follows; Payments to PGE $1,897.47 Legal Notices 141.75 Administration 474.06 Total Cost $2,513.28 Final Assessment Per Ordinance No. 88-29, the costs are to be spread equally among the 32 parcels in the LID. Therefore, the final assessment is $78.54 per parcel. The final assessment roll is attached. The estimated assessments at the time of LID formation were $93.75 per parcel. Actual costs were less, as it was not necessary to use any of the budgeted contingency; administrative costs were also quite low due to the simplicity of the project. Submitted January 12, 1989, Randall R. Wooley City Engineer br/8674D FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR S.W. 79TH AVENUE STREETLIGHTING L.I.D. TAX LOT NO. PARCEL AREA PROPERTY OWNER FINAL (WCTM 1S1 36CA) (Square Foot) ASSESSMENT 2201 9,643 William & Marian Frye $78.54 10940 SW 79th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 2202 7,982 Leonard & Linda Hing $78.54 10910 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 2203 8,727 BenjFranklin Fed S&L $78.54 REO/LUF #5302 P.O. Box 6400 Portland, OR 97228-6400 (Re: 10880 Sw 79th Ave) 2204 8,145 Warren & Betty Johnson $78.54 469 S. Pino Circle Apache Junction, AZ 85220 (Re: 10850 SW 79th Ave) 2205 7,748 Gerald & Joan Cach $78.54 12525 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 (Re: 7905 SW Thorn) 2206 7,981 Shirley June Stevens $78.54 7945 SW Thorn St. Tigard, OR 97223 2208 9,670 Thomas Park $78.54 7960 SW Thorn St. Tigard, OR 97223 2209 11,515 Del Zander $78.54 13700 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (Re: 10945 SW 79th Ave.) ` 2300 11,088 Keith & Adele McDonald $78.54 10975 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 2400 10,153 Meri Jean Landers $78.54 11005 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 2500 20,307 Earl & Marjorie Moxley $78.54 11065 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 I 2700 10,153 Donald C. Tobey $78.54 8285 SW Landau St. Tigard, OR 97223 (Re: 11095 SW 79th Ave.) 2800 10,153 Juan & Rosa Arce $78.54 11125 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 2900 10,153 Robert & Betty Sickle $78.54 11155 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3000 10,153 David Wheelhouse $78.54 c/o Douglas Denney 11185 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3100 10,153 Dept of VA-St, of Oregon $78.54 c/o Roger & Joanne Curnes 11215 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3200 20,307 Luther & Eilleen Branch $78.54 11255 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3300 13,538 Leonard & Helen Loos $78.54 7935 SW Pfaffle St. Tigard, OR 97223 3301 13,038 John & Barbara Hammersmith $78.54 11305 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3500 17,430 Gerry & Jenii Peterson $78.54 11300 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3600 13,538 Robert W. Knight $78.54 11290 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3700 10,153 Gladys K. Theal $78.54 11260 Sw 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3800 10,153 Lowell & Dorothy Reynolds $78.54 11250 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 3900 10,153 Everett & Patricia Rowles $78.54 11200 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 j I • 4000 10,153 Lillian S. Palcic $78.54 11170 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 4100 11,507 Leroy Johnson $78.54 Lois Baerwald 11140 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 4201 8,800 Edward & Sheila Wozniak $78.54 11110 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 4300 10,153 Earl & Gladys Anderson $78.54 11080 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 4400 10,153 Irene K. Gray $78.54 11050 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 4500 10,153 Ruthanne Rusnak $78.54 11020 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 4600 10,153 Lewis & Ann Maxwell $78.54 10990 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 r 4700 12,423 Walter & Christa Geniuch $78.54 10960 SW 79th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 TOTALS 355,529 $2.513.28 /br January 11, 1989 z CITY OF TIGARD,_OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 _ DATE SUBMITTED: December 12, 1968 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution p~ PREVIOUS ACTION: Placed on acceptinq Getty's Emerald Acres l maintenance nuarantee period /86 subdivision lic improvements ; PREPARED BY: John Hagman l- DEPT PLEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Community Devlp. Dept. POLI Y ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Getty's Emerald Acres subdivision is located on SW Bonita Road just east of SW Hall Blvd. (see attached map). 2. All public improvements have now been satisfactorily completed and have withstood the required one year maintenance guarantee period. 3. The Engineering Division certifies that the improvement is now acceptable and that all requirements have been met. 4. Therefore, it is recommended that (in accordance with the terms of the project agreement) the City Council accept the public improvements, namely - street, sanitary and storm sewer system and streetlighting for City operation and maintenance responsibility and, further, that the Adb Council authorize release of the assurance bond. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None; the (City-Developer) project agreement specified City acceptance upon satisfactory completion of all City requirements. FISCAL IMPACT 1. City assumption of responsibility for operation and maintenance of the public improvements specified above. SUGGESTED ACTION Pass tole Resolution titled: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS GETTY'S EMERALD ACRES SUBDIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS." ke/84150 a i SO gW 89thAVE S. W. 89, y~ IS W 88th AVE. N 9x f!1 1 I 1D 44 60 M.S S.W. !01 87th CT. Ow E x~ Z I 5. M. 3 w. 88th A E 87th AVE. z x ti0 1D i N S.W. D U 86th AVE 5 N` r NAL - BLVD. JAIN ibWD' ~ - N r v~ S. 0 ' D f f S. 84t T FAIVVO CREEK { N cn c ~ o rmZ f m f 0 n S Q' (A 3/It/ P~ £8 M' i _ i ? S. W. COLONY CREEK a PL LP S•w• 81st AVE. i ' s S.W. 8 tn~CT. i I ~ •M ¢ "Id g X 00, q in ~o 80NITA mFIRS ~nj~ VILLAGE ` 8 1 ,I 9A1N0 CONDOMINIUMS O ~ I m 1 L ~ I Cil'Y OF TIGARD~ OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 _ DATE SUBMITTED: December 20, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution_ PREVIOUS ACTION: Placed on maintenance accepting Penn Lawn Estates No. Zia; guarantee period on Januar 1987 _ Subdiv. public improvements PREPARED BY: John Hagman ^ DEPT- HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK% / REQUESTED ELY: Communit_v_ ev p Dept. POL ICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Penn Lawn Estates No. 2 Subdivision is located adjacent to and south of S.W. Springwood Drive, between S.W. 115th Avenue and S.W. 118th Avenue (see attached map). 2. All public improvements have now been satisfactorily completed and have withstood the required one year maintenance guarantee period. 3. The Engineering Division certifies that the improvement is now acceptable and that all requirements have been met. 4. Therefore, it is recommended that (in accordance with the terms of the project agreement) the City Council accept the public improvements, namely - street, sanitary and storm sewer system and streetlighting for City operation and maintenance responsibility and, further, that the Council authorize release of the assurance bond. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None; the (City-Developer) project agreement specified City acceptance upon satisfactory completion of all City requirements. FISCAL IMPACT 1. City assumption of responsibility for operation and maintenance of the public improvements specified above. SUGGESTED ACTION Pass the Resolution titled: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS PENN LAWN ESTATES NO. 2 SUBDIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS." sj/8496D N _ GO RO p0 ON NDOM`N, ~O JMS CO S.MC 1• • 400 v S.W. BASSWOOD O p Z . ! 9s ~ 3~~ 9 OREENWAY s.w, v SCHOL W000 0 ~ i O CT. TOWNCENTER N S.W. o c vi- "sty G it \ N W 0~- w w zn ? V Z Z L a ~ m ' a ~ No 0 ` o .1y Cs D ❑OD 3~ ANTON OR. / . S.W. MANZANITA 1 t 4 r--7 ect .r 1 I MCT. r 1 I w S. TIMOTHY 39 3 e j N = vl NORT14 DAKOTA as Na ui sT S.W. I n S.W..BURL 0 S ®VRLCRES' DR = O,P SUMMER ST. t.. SUMMERCREST us Va h S.W. TIGARD S s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 ATE SUBMITTED: January 12, 1989 _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of REVIOUS ACTION: Presentation to Parks Master Plans / ouncil on December 5 1988 _ PREPARED BY: Elizabath A. Newton ft. z2/. i DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK / REQUESTED BY: Parks & Recreation Board POLI Y ISSUE Should the City Council accept the "Parks Master Plans" as prepared by Murase and Associates under contract to the City? i' i c INFORMATION SUMMARY ` f On July 25, 1988, the City Council approved a contract with Murase and Associates to prepare Master Plans for the three city-wide parks: Cook, Fanno Creek and Summerlake. On December 5, 1988 the consultants presented their recommendations to the City Council in a joint workshop with the Park and Recreation Board. On December 21, 1988 the Park and Recreation Board reviewed the written narrative. A copy of the written narrative is attached with a z resolution to accept the consultant's report. In addition, the consultants ' have prepared large-scale plans for illustrative purposes. i ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution accepting the Parks Master Plans prepared by Murase and Associates. f' F ' 2. Delay adoption of the resolution. 5..; E- FISCAL IMPACT If Council adopts the resolution accepting the consultant's report, the 5% retained on the contract will be paid to the consultant. wSUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution accepting the Parks Master Plans prepared by Murase and Associates. br/8728D TIGARD CITY Pl --i ANS PARK COOS{ PARK CREEK PARK FANNO LAKE PARK 5~r,~EIZ x.< ~ • saw I~,~ . L.~~ ~ .tom'` ` 10 17 ei ~ ~M ttlll ~'t111"tt•1t VVV ~II~ 49 CITY OF TIGARD PARKS MASTER PLANS Design Narrative FOR COOK PARK FANNO CREEK PARK SUMMERLAKE PARK MURASE associates 1300 N.W. Northrup Portland, OR 97209 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No./Fig. No. Introduction 1 Cook Park Narrative 2-5 Master Plan Fig. 1 Fanno Creek Park Narrative 6-10 Master Plan Fig. 2 Summerlake Park Narrative 11-13 Master Plan Fig. 3 Appendixes Appendix A: Cost Estimates C- Cook Park Al - A3 Fanno Creek Park A4 - A5 Summerlake Park A6 - A7 Appendix B: Review & Permit Requirements Cook Park B1 - B2 Fanno Creek Park B3 - B4 General Comments B5 Appendix C: Cook Park Riverfront Improvements Cl Riverfront Plan Fig. 4 . ~ t1CT~Q~ ~~~R~D ~ c ~ G ' ~ 4` i Introduction Master Plans for the City of Tigard's Cook, Fanno Creek and Summerlake Parks have been prepared to help direct the further development of these community recreational resources. The Master Plans have been developed through the collaborative efforts of the Park Board, City staff and interested citizens. Facilities and site improvements identified in the Master Plans are needed to help meet the present and future recreational needs for the citizens of Tigard. When the plans are implemented, both Tigard and the larger metropolitan area will benefit. Besides helping to meet the recreational needs of the community, and preserving important natural areas, the implementation of the Master Plans will work to support commercial and residential development in the City. The development of Fanno Park will directly complement anticipated improvements to the City Center. The outdoor recreational opportunities offered in the park will attract area residents to the Main Street area and increase their exposure to this commercial center. Further, the park improvements will provide an attractive setting for the commercial area, making it a more pleasant experience for shoppers and the commercial clients. The improvements at all these parks will significantly expand the variety and quantity of recreational facilities available for the citizens or Tigard. This expansion of recreational opportunity will enhance the livability of the community and its attractiveness for the area's residents. 1 ~ f r Q'J t 1 MASTEIZ. PLAN COOK PARK ~.Sw ' ;r1 yMM ~J ' h r SIMON a I I Cook Park Master Plan An overall view of the Master Plan recommendations shows the recognition of three separate and unique areas in Cook Park. The first is the upper area where the existing Little League and soccer fields, large picnic area, playground, picnic shelter, and restrooms are located. This is the area where the greatest variety and quantity of recreational facilities are to be found. Presently, and as provided for in the ` Master Plan, this is to be the area where the highest concentration of active recreation will occur. The second are the areas of natural riparian and wetland vegetation. This includes most of the river bank, the large wooded area in the central and eastern portion of the park and the small wetland area north of the soccer fields,. These areas are to remain in a natural state. Only limited trail work, interpretation displays and habitat enhancement will take place. i ~y'. "j - _ ' Ste`` fi :;i._, =.f. The third is the riverfront around the area of the existing boat dock and launching ramp. Presently this area is used for limited picnicking and launching of small craft into the Tualatin River. While this is one of the few access points to this river, the launching area is little used. Beyond these recreational uses, this area is used for storage of surplus materials. The Master Plan calls for improvements to this area which will significantly expand picnicking and river-oriented recreation. Several overall objectives served to direct the development of the Master Plan for Cook Park. The first objective was to take care of the need to update and improve existing facilities. Existing irrigation systems, the playground, Little League fields, and restrooms all have become worn with use and time. Rehabilitation improvement and expansion, in the case of the playground, is needed to meet present recreational demands. The second objective was to provide additional recreational opportunities by adding new facilities. A fishing area designed to accommodate the mobility handicapped, parking, and expanded picnicking are indicated for the riverfront area. These and the other related improvements in this area will allow for expanded and more intensive use of the riverfront. Riverside trails and roadside bike lanes are included 2 to make the park more accessible and useable by bicyclists. Additional soft trails, trail heads and interpretative displays are included to provide for improved use of the natural woodland area. The wetland north of the soccer fields is improved to both provide a better edge to the park and to improve the habitat value and potential educational uses of this site. In the upper area of the park, the expanded playground and spray pool will greatly enhance the use of the park for families. The bandstand and adjacent expanse of lawn will improve the park's function for musical and other community events. The inclusion of the caretaker/gatehouse and small utility garage will improve park security, enable the collection of entry fees (if this becomes desirable), and improve efficiency of maintenance operations in the park. Irrigation of all new and existing developed areas are included to both improve park use and reduce maintenance and operational costs. The third objective was to improve the safety and utility of the park. Improvements to the safety of the park are to be accomplished in a number of ways. First, rehabilitation and updating of existing facilities will eliminate potential hazards. Second, widening of the access road to include bicycle lanes and the provision of separate riverside trails will provide for safer use and access of the park. Finally, realignment of the main access road to the outer edge of the most active recreation areas will limit pedestrian crossing and other conflicts between park users and cars. Improving the utility of the park has been accomplished by adding facilities (as mentioned in the previous page), relocating access roadways and by regrading and stabilizing the bank in the riverfront area. Relocating the access road occurs in two locations. The main access road is presently located between the main picnic and playground area at the Little League fields. This road is relocated to the north and to the west of the Little League field, eliminating the division of the park. This ! realignment allows for the redesign of this active recreation area and provides a more supportive and complementary juxtaposing of recreational facilities. This frees up this central area of the park, allowing for the expansion of the playground and the addition of a spray pool, bandstand, and large lawn area to this area of the park. This provides a central focus, unity, and organization which the park presently lacks, improving the safety, utility and aesthetics of the park. i 3 ~a Relocation of the riverfront roadway and parking to the north, away from the river's edge, expands the useable space along the river and allows for the addition of new, and improvements of existing facilities in that area. The Master Plan calls for significant upgrading of the riverfront area. An improved approach, and parking, will allow for better use of the river access ramp. Paving of the road at the parking area will improve access. Regrading of a stretch of the riverfront to provide for a gradual sloping "beach" will improve use by canoeists and riverbank fishermen. Additionally, "handicapped" parking, paved walkways and a paved river edge plaza will provide access and a fishing platform for mobility- impaired citizens. 0 0 d At! The final objective has been to improve the aesthetics and other visual attributes of Cook Park, making it a more attractive and supportive resource for the community. Tree plantings along the main access road and in the recreation areas Cook Park at Tualatin River Edge_.. 4 change of Which will reflect the river materials arian of Organization, and s along the r'verfro to access al nP scale, sense ° lantmg k's connection provide Additio of nal native. p the par the edge seasons. sense of that area. IC will reinforce the vironment and the attractiveness en tnnc v°' VV i Ss ~ I i y 'l I ~r- ~ ~ ~ ~ j ! R ?4 . t . _ _ _ _ L~:_._..~ . ''J 'F ~ ~ F ~ t I ~ i;~ ,.y.,. u . . ,~......aa*.?.. •:.wa?s~ `c„+5 ,w~.. .+v.ae^:~=.F -sffi"^^^'^;%~'xfE.~+-,~ven~C'r.~0. r _ - M _ hip tl. fl Lh_ 1(I. I q .!_0 i T 1 P I. T~ ~ PI ITjll f j+ 1 ~ P. I tll f(. {f IfI111 If1 ~p 111 AIL qL Llt rIL ~~TTI) tfL ryi LIB etr r i FII ~ ~ ~I ~ rae~~~~ ~~~I~1~I ~~Ilr.~~ ~If ~IfL'1~2ili~'lj t~ ~ t[► C j ! ( 1 f i i ( I ~ I Ifs t~ ~ # - I _IL ~ NOSE: IF THIS MICRDFIlAEO 11' 2 4 5 7..._._ . ~ 8 - ; ORAl1IlJ; IS LESS CLEAR THAN ~i ~ - - _ - ~ THIS NDTICE, IT IS OUc TO ~ . 1}f QOALITT DF TfE ORIGINAL _ _ _ ~ _ ' ,r 06 SZ BZ LZ 8Z SZ >Z £2 ZZ IZ GZ 6f 8f 11 91 Sf frl 61 ZI II Gf B 8 1 9 5 4 £ Z la'°' F' aLICIIaINL~Lndun~ua _ 11. , c ~ ,d l f, ' t. - c ' ~ . « .t Pf~ _ K ~ ~ 1.,, _ ~ fe.-~y - - n p _ w=.,- - ,wf 1 _ ~ - ~ ~y ~ . _ r+ - _ - ~ / ~ 1r ~ _ ~ / _r'~ ~ r~ E 1 r +d' ~ ~ nom-- ~ , ~ ,T, ~ ri , >1'~` `u't~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~A. ~ FANNO CREEK PARK ~ ~ ~ , ~ d ~ MASTER PV~N cma~wu¢a ,1 I I o ~ a ~ ~ ~ fig. 2 z: € ~ € I € f i ~ € U L € riB~r€!!►€'I'ni'€~~'l~~mlr?r{w►,Tij')i€j rf~ii+-i w' pig' Ni~41? h€, w,~wr rn,a rrT w, r r 1 a , , ,€r , , , , a, , r rr, ~ I ~ [u~ 1 I,t l t I€t€ €j I€t Irt = NDTE: IF TNIS NlcaoFlu4ED ; t . _~...~I.. ~ 2 3 4 _ 5 6.... 7 8 9 _ 0 Jl..._...... €2' DRAN1NTi IS LESS CLEAR THAN I~ ~ iHIS !'NICE, IT 3S Dlk TO i 1HE QUALITY OF Tff ORIGINAL iI _ - _ DRANING. ~ }s--..~ ~ ; oe sz az az sz sa tiz ez zz ra oz sr er t! si sr b, et zi n or s e e a s b e z r~ F 'rnrGuduulaRlru,6,N€Nxs~N,lN r . ~ ~ s I ~ r r w _ , - ---m . - _ _ _ - ~ - 1 t r , F~ ~yl~"' 1'te _ O i rti~', - 1e Y t • x i ~L 111J~ 11 R ~ f ! , ~ 2' L•, lm~' } L L ~'t Fanno Creek Park The proposed boundaries of Fanno Creek Park lie within the 100 year floodplain on either side of Fanno Creek between Main Street and Hall Boulevard. This site is a segment of a proposed greenway corridor which runs the length of the Creek, within the City of Tigard, extending downstream to the confluence with the Tualatin River. The park's function as a part of this linear corridor, the natural environments which make up most of the proposed park, its location in a floodway, and it's contiguousness to both the Main Street commercial area, the Civic Center, Senior Center and residential areas are all important factors which directed the development of the Master Plan. i The objectives the Master Plan hopes to achieve include: 1. Public land acquisition needed to complete the securing of this segment of the greenway and park. 2. Completion of this segment of the greenway's trail system. 3. Development of recreation areas to support activities in the Main Street commercial area and at the Civic Center. 4. Preservation of the natural habitat corridor. r 5. Improvement of the public's recognition and use of this community recreation resource system, through the development of recreational facilities, nature interpretative displays, and other means. E 6. Identification of features and facilities in the park which are compatible with, and tolerant of periodic flooding. Presently, only the eastern portion of the, proposed park is under public ownership. F The portion of the floodplain west of the Civic Center still needs to be placed in public hands. In addition, a key parcel which is out of the floodplain, at the f western edge facing onto Main Street, needs to be obtained to provide adequate visual and physical access and presence for the park in that important commercial corridor. t An 8-foot wide paved path is called for to run the entire length of the park. This path and smaller segments connecting it to the northern and southern edges of the park will provide access to and through Fanno Creek Park. Creating adequate linkage through the park is especially important because of its role in the larger f greenway trail system. To assure an adequate route for through travel, a pathway on the southern edge of this park is shown for the segment west of the proposed E p~ P a 6 Ash Street extension. This will be needed when the area on the north side of the Creek is fully developed and becomes too congested to be a suitable trail route. Providing more cultural or active recreational areas to support the Main Street commercial area and Civic Center, and preserving the natural vegetation, leads to the delineation of three distinct areas within the park. The first area is referred to as the "Main Street Plaza and Water Garden." This area lies to the north of the creekbed and extends from Main Street, east to the Ash Street extension. This area is designed to be intensively used and programmed for a variety of recreational, civic, and commercial functions. The ability to provide for numerous activities and functions will make this a strong attraction for the community, serve to support the adjacent commercial area, and meet the community's need for recreation. This site is seen as an important part of developing the Main Street and City Center area into an important focus for the citizens of Tigard and surrounding areas. The elements shown in this area are designed to be integrated into the future commercial establishments to be developed along this segment of the River. Facing on Main Street is a paved urban plaza. Portals mark the edge of the square and the entry to the park. Steps along the southern edge of the square lead directly down to the creek, reinforcing the physical and visual connection of the waterway to the park adjacent to the commercial area. In the creek, adjacent to the plaza, water steps (small waterfalls) are indicated. These help improve water quality and provide visual and auditory interest for the park. i 17 v"d • E i i Civic Plaza at Fanno Creek f i 7 East of the plaza, in the area of the existing large open field and small existing pond, a new large pond is shown. This pond functions as a visual focus for this part of the park, reinforcing the water-oriented theme of the park. In addition, this larger body of water serves to enhance the habitat diversity of the park, buffer the natural areas from more intensively-used portions of the park and thereby support a more stable environment for birds and other wildlife in the park. A large water jet is indicated in the center of the pond. This, or a similar feature, functions as a visual focus, while improving the water quality of the pond and masking sounds from the nearby Pacific Highway. On the northern shore, trees and green lawns lead down to the edge of the pond where varieties of water-loving herbaceous perennials and shrubs are planted. The theme of this area, as insinuated by the name, is that of-an English water garden- -tended, but not manicured. This informality is in place both to reinforce this theme, and to provide a design capable of weathering periodic inundation by high wintertime water levels. In the middle of the north shore, an amphitheater is shown. This will provide a location for outdoor plays, concerts, other performances, and public events. On the eastern shore of the pond, a "Tea Garden" is indicated. This includes a tea house and garden area where tea, and other refreshments can be served. This location could be managed by a concessionaire for the general public and for holding of special group meetings or receptions. The plaza, amphitheater and "Tea Garden" are all facilities that can be programmed and operated to generate revenue to support the maintenance and operations of the park. f ~.".J o 9 C O The "Civic Center Water Garden" is the second distinct area. This area is at the eastern end of the park, immediately south and east of the Civic Center. This is a small area of maintained lawn, trees and water edge perennials and shrub plantings. A pond is excavated in the location of an existing overflow channel to create a visual focus for the area and to d versify the area's natural habitats. A small weir is shown at the downstream edge of the pond to control summertime water levels. An aeration spray head and pump may need to be installed in the pond to improve water quality. In addition to the pond excavation, a small channel is shown connecting the stream to the backwater slough adjacent to the Civic Center. This is indicated to help improve passage for wildlife and to improve the i. water quality in the backwater area. t On the edge of a second pond, a small arbor and patio are shown. This arbor and f surrounding lawn area will be used for picnic lunches and small gatherings to complement the plaza areas at the Civic Center.; x. : North of the Senior Center, an area of existing canary grass is shown to be mown to create a rough meadow to allow for the informal play activities of people in the adjacent residential area. The rest of the park, comprising the majority of the park area, is indicated to be a nature preserve. Here natural vegetation and habitat areas will remain i undisturbed or altered to improve their natural character and ability to support the area's wildlife inhabitants. This includes preservation of a large portion of the center of the park in an undisturbed state. On the western end, adjacent to the "Main Street Water Garden," the blackberries that crowd the Creek edge will be removed and native trees, shrubs, grasses and herbaceous plants are called for. This includes a planting of native materials along the southern edge of the Creek adjacent to the plaza area. This is needed to assure a continuous corridor of natural vegetation along the Creek. This is important for the maintenance of diverse and stable populations of native plants and other wildlife. 9 At the eastern end of the park, at Hall Boulevard, an entry plaza with interpretative and educational displays are indicated. This is indicated, not only to inform visitors about the natural environs of the park, but also to call the public's attention to the fact that Fanno Creek is a public park and nature preserve. Sr (12 7r cll~ . i AS-04 X jy '\t `Ste, , ~y . Arbor and Patio at Fanno Pond. 10 ~t ~ y r t ~ _ . ~ ^r~ i t i L ~ xr7h..^'-,r ag ~~,.~e':+.~ Wis... w,~~, - ~.s-•-~w9,. ,,'rs._... - - ~ ~ {Iti~{I lil'IyI tyr~gl~Ill~go tyi0lyt IppTt 81 r~ m IIT 11 ~ lyl is ~l ql I~ 1Ti lil IyC lyl lyl tyl ip yl ep ql Ip Iyl Ip 111 Ip ili lyl ql lyi III C° 3 i t ~ ~ f ] 1 ~t(Tt~T i 3°~..~ y?htq I. f ~ (~1 l f j ! u- ~ E ! ! 1 I f ~ ► f ~ ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. _ 9 0 -11_ ._-12' ' N)TE: IF THIS MICROFILMED °i ORAMIt~a IS tE55 CLEAR THAN ~ - 7HIS NOTICE IT :S WE TO ! ~ _ ' 1FE QWLITY OF 71E ORIGINAL 10£ 6Z 8Z t2 8Z SZ >t £t ZZ i3 OZ St BI LI 91 5f 41 EI ZI II 01 6 ~ B - 5 6 E .Z Imo" nI 'dII~III~I111~Nil~llli{uupxl~Ml _ - a _ ,~o ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ ~I~ ~ , a ~ ~ ~ f - ~ ` ~ r ~ - ~ ~ ^s , - s - - - ~ ~ . - - y~ ~ ~ 'uf r' t~ . ,.«4 ~ ~~f ~ - . /l t `p 2 ~..1 e --a Y ~I / _ ~ j _ ~ 4 / ♦ _ ~ "9 ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ai ? ~ } S 4 ^'.f _ Y 1J .p t A~ ~ ~ V A '~t ~ 1 $ ,,.w - ~ ~,.f~ ,I Yt, ~ ~ ~ D i ,0~ _ ,o .c ~ ~a` a 't a. ~ 000K_P_A_ _R_K_ ~ MA5iER PLAN cnr a ncnRa on , 00 1 .a a~ - ~ as w~ . R1IrI e{rgii _ i .F fife rJr r~l eft qr fl{ [fr ili I}jrf< _ ~ Ih_('fi~.i~ I_.. _ ~ I t a ql I{i 111 1 1f1 tp 3Ir rlr ~ji TI rfr rp qr 111 rN r{i ►rl rl T,Cr 1 f .I l C l ~ f ~ I~ Ttl If ~ I~! ~ CTI ~ I~ I I i i 1 I i t{ f h f'~'m'i~' fi ~ _ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 II _ .12' FATE: IF THIS MICROFIUIED i~r~++r@+`~r+r+~+~"~r - '4 . DAAMIIG 1S 1E55 CLEAR THAN ~ - . i THIS FIOT3CE, 3T IS DUE TO . ~ TI£ QUAL3TY OF TI£ OPIGIHAL ' _ _ DRAtlIHS. ~ ~ OE 62 02 LZ 92 L2 frZ 6Z 22 I2 O2 61 BI LI 91 ~Sf ~41 EI 2l 11^ OI b 0 L ~ 9 9 1 £ ..Z I'""' F '1~~'~ n _ - `A11111411111~IIl1uIII FIHlDtl _ ~ _ ~rj~., ~'ic5i: .tit. . o~ low i Summerlake Park Summerlake Park is a designated community park, located in a rapidly growing residential area of northwest Tigard. The park is located on Summer Creek. The proposed greemvay corridor along this creek will be an important extension of the park's recreational features. Summer Lake was formed by the damming of the creek. The low flows of Summer Creek have led to some water quality problems in the lake, but efforts are underway to attempt to mitigate these problems. f Presently, development of and access to the park are limited. The completion of Winter Lake Drive will greatly improve access to the park. The program of land c acquisition and development, identified in the Master Plan, will provide the space and facilities needed for community park activities. The objectives for the Master Plan include: 1. Acquisition of additional lands to provide adequate buffering from residential areas and space for needed recreational facilities. 2. Provision of recreation facilities and features needed to meet community and neighborhood needs. 3. Preservation and enhancement of existing and potentially significant ! natural areas. i 4 Land acquisition called for by the Master Plan include the upper half of the western end of the park, the area around the conference/reception facilities, and the southeast portion of the park, south and east of the lakeside path. Acquisition of these parcels will complete the enclosure of the lake, provide an amount of land needed to provide adequate facilities, and land needed for a park-like setting for the lake and surrounding park. Recreation facilities indicated in the Master Plan are aimed at providing recreation for the community as a whole, and surrounding residential areas. First of all, Summerlake Park is a recreation "node" on the proposed Fanno Creek greenway. When the greenway and associated trail system are completed, many of Tigard's citizens will have safe and convenient access to the park along this route. The trail system called for on the Master Plan will both complete the segment of the greenway path which runs through the park, and provide facilities for popular forms of recreation (e.g. jogging, walking, and bicycling) in the park. The paved trail j system includes roadside sidewalks, an 8-foot wide paved trail all around the lake, and bridge over the dams and at several small stream crossings. In addition to the paved trails, a 6-foot wide "soft" trail is indicated looping the lake. The trail runs ` 41 alongside the paved trail around the lake and conference/reception area, forming t a loop over 8/10 of a mile in length. Cutting through the middle of the loop, ` l 11 4 another segment of the soft trail system runs between the existing forest and southwest edge of the lake. The conference/reception facilities indicated south of the forested area will provide the community and neighborhood with flexible and attractive places for meetings and special events. Revenues generated by this facility, if desired, can be used to offset park operating expenses. At the west end of the lake, facilities typical of a small community park are called for. These include tennis and basketball courts, playground and spray pool, large open grassy play area, a restroom, parking lot, a picnic shelter and a picnic area capable of handling a small group or a number of individual picnickers. At the southeast corner of the park, an additional playground, restroom, large grassy play area, and lakeside docks are indicated. a ^vzw 0*4 4 tzt Conference Center Garden at Summerlake Park. 12 Improvements needed in the park, but not shown on the Master Plan, include the reestablishment of lawn and the installation of a new irrigation system along the north and southeast shorelines of the park. The specific layout, position, and variety of facilities indicated in the Master Plan have been tailored to provide for community-wide needs in a way compatible with, and supportive of the surrounding neighborhood area. Achieving a complimentary relationship with the neighborhood is also accomplished by providing a shrub buffer for the existing homes along the northern edge of the park and the future residential area southeast of the lake. Plaiicing of tree groupings along the lakeshore is intended to provide screening of the residential areas, while maintaining views onto the lake. Landscaping and mounding between the street and parking areas will provide visual buffering of these areas for the residential areas south and west of the park. The large mixed evergreen and deciduous forest in the center of the park, the islands in the lake and the lake edge itself, all provide a rich environment for. natural vegetation and wildlife. The Master Plan calls for the preservation of the forest and adjacent lake edge wetland in their natural status. A soft surface trail through this area will provide a pleasant exercise route, and an opportunity for those hoping to observe wildlife up close. Enhancement of the lake edge and lake island involves reestablishment of more natural and diverse vegetation. This involves both the planting of native plant materials and the limiting of lake edge mowing to allow native plants to establish themselves. The lake and woodlands are an important link along the Fanno Creek greenway corridor. The preservation and enhancement efforts called for by this plan will not only maintain the continuity of this corridor, but also provide an attractive setting for the park itself. r J .~ti dd n Bike..Path and Isiand in Summerlake Park. 13 S_U_MMER_ LA_ _K_ _E PARK MASTER PLAN CITY OF 'CICARD. OK J \ \ ~ i ' i .I o nee loo L01. ~f CID So 1'. ` PY.Wl 'J - .NNIA T.Y. lryPoN Q 1 ,.J 4n414Uy if U.s~atw S.wn l~rn ..li~'•~~` J ` ~...w. ~iawwn_~rr1.:.w.I,n.r.w.w.nw....»+ti. 1-. fb.l. I - 'FJ. - In ~ ~ ~ (rt'~~ inn` "Cj, • A YWtl Mry h..c rr rl~ t ~ r ~ I 1 ~ f e! S 1 ~ ` -y S ~1~-,I .or lake • Y ~ ~ t~rvda . r F ~ . ~ it - • 1 ('ti 06 1 wYYa F \ '"r( r4.1w _1 ~ owo...rt..v... raw.1~N f •ir~' 1.»r. 1 t, « -raw I1 ~}y~5[~gp~~~M ~y ~ l ~ ~iYp C + •,.v~ w W APPENDIX u r 1 _ ~ p i APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATES I. Cook Park Master Plan Cost Estimate January 9, 1989 A. Asphalt Trail (8' wide, 6,600 L.F.) $ 92,400 B. Concrete Walks (8' wide, 2,440 L.F.) 48,800 C. Concrete Plaza (23,000 Sq. Ft.) 34,500 i D. Parking Area 1. @ Little League Field (59 cars) 50,000 2. @ Soccer Fields (98 cars) 84,000 E. Access Drive (pavement and curb) 1. 40' wide (1,600 L.F.) 152,000 2. 24' wide (1,060 L.F.) 63,600 3. Improve Roadway and Turnaround @ south edge of picnic area 10,000 F. Remove and Dispose of Existing Asphalt t Pavement (47,750 Sq. Ft.) 76,000 } G. Relocate Little League Fields l (backstop, player benches, fencing and field work) 55,000 H. Shelter/Concession Stand/Restroom 150,000 I I. Half Basketball Court 5,000 J. Amphitheater/Bandstand 25,000 K. Renovate Existing Restroom 40,000 L. Playground/Tot Lot 80,000 M. Spray Pool 50,000 Al i i t k N. Soft Trail (6' wide, 1,600 L.F.) 5,600 0. Benches (15) 7,500 P. Picnic Tables (30) 15,000 i Q. Irrigation F 1. Existing Picnic Area (210,000 Sq. Ft.) 63,000 2. Access Road, Parking Lot at Plaza Area (86,000 Sq. Ft.) 25,800 3. Soccerfield Area (234,000) 70,200 K R. Wetland Enhancement 30,000 S. Landscaping 1. Trees 65,000 x 2. Shrubs 50,000 ` 3. Lawn (290,000 Sq. Ft.) 32,000 J i T. Caretaker/Gate House 80,000 i AMP, j U. Riverfront Improvements (to be continued) 1. Earthwork (4,000 C.Y.) 16,000 2. Roads ~gg a. Paving and Base (39,000 Sq. G Ft.) 39,000 b. Curbing (2,700 L.F.) 13,500 3. Trails a. Paved (3,600 L.F.) 50,400 b. Soft (2,000 L.F.) 7,000 4. Fishing Plaza a. Paving 950 b. Wall 8,000 5. Back Stabilization (2,500 Sq. Ft.) 14,000 6. Irrigation 30,000 7. Landscaping 75,000 TOTAL $1,714,250 i •I. A2 NOTE: 1. Due to the schematic nature of plans, it may be appropriate to figure contingency costs into the estimate of the total cost. I f t i 9 f •l. ~i k A3 I` - i II. Fanno Creek Park Master Plan Cost Estimate January 9, 1989 j, A. Asphalt Trail (8' wide, 3,270 L.F.) $ 49,050 j t B. Bridge Relocation 7,500 C. General Riparian Planting 11,000 } D. Path Lighting (39 each) 58,500 f ; E. East Entry 1. Plaza Paving (1,250 Sq. Ft.) 6,250: 2. Display Kiosk & Park Sign 8,000 3. Benches (4) 2,000 4. Trash Receptacles (2) 500 5. Riparian Plantings 5,000 6. Irrigation (15,000 Sq. Ft.) 10,000 F. Meadow Development 10,000 G. City Hall Water Garden 1. Pond Excavation 15,000 ,i 2. Wier 5,000 3. Arbor and Arbor Patio 22,000 4. Planting 22,000 5. Irrigation (33,000 Sq. Ft.) 11,000 6. Benches (7) 3,500 7. Picnic Tables (7) 3,500 i H. Main Street Plaza and Water Garden 1. Plaza a. Paving (16,800 Sq. Ft.) 67,200 b. Bollards (8) 3,200 C. Entry Portals (2) 10,000 d. Planting 20,000 e. Plaza Creekside Steps and weirs 48,000 2. Weirs (2) 10,000 A4 i 6 I 3. Pond Excavation 85,000 4. Rough Grading 20,000 5. Irrigation 42,000 6. Planting (Water and Tea Garden) and Lawns 142,000 7. Riparian Planting 20,000 8. South Bank Asphalt Trail (8' wide, 1,020 L.F.) 15,300 9. Tea House and Courtyard 80,000 10. Amphitheater 35,000 11. Water Jet 4,500 12. Pump at well 10,000 Is 13. Asphalt Bicycle Path (north bank replacement path) 10,000 I~TOTAL $872,000 NOTES: 1. No land acquisition costs have been added into these figures. 2. Due to the schematic nature of plans, it may be appropriate to figure contingency costs into the estimate of the total cost. s , j ! A5 III. Summerlake Park Master Plan Cost Estimate January 9, 1989 A. Bridge @ Dam $ 47,000 B. Footbridges over Creek (3) 3,000 C. Soft Trail (6' wide, 5,470 L.F.) 20,000 D. Asphalt Trail (8' wide, 4,030 L.F.) 56,420 E. Lake Edge Landscaping and Irrigation (area between existing walk at lake edge on the north, east, and southeast lake shores) J 1. Riparian Plantings 8,000 + 2. Tree Planting 22,000 k 3. Lawn 16,800 j 4. Irrigation 35,000 { F. Docks (2) 4,000 G. North Shore Property Line Shrub Planting 8,400 H. Southeast Area 1. Playground (equipment, benches, walk) 30,000 2. Restrooms 80,000 3. Irrigation 29,000 4. Lawn 13,200 5. Trees 17,000 6. Creek Planting 3,600 7. Property Line Shrub Planting 3,800 I. West End 1. General Site Preparation 20,000 2. Irrigation 62,000 I' 3. Lawn 27,600 4. Shrubs 27,000 A6 ; i ; I M 5. Trees 25,500 6. Parking Lot 20,000 7. Tennis Courts 50,000 8. Basketball Court 10,000 9. Picnic Shelter 17,000 10. Picnic Tables (20) 10,000 11. Drinking Fountains (4) 6,000 12. Benches (10) 5,000 13. Path Lighting (12) 18,000 14. Restrooms 80,000 15. Playground 60,000 16. Spray Pool 40,000 J. Conference/Reception House Area 1. Conference/Reception Building 190,000 2. Parking Lot 45,000 3. Irrigation 30,300 4. Walks 8,400 5. Patios 15,000 6. Landscaping 105,750 K. Half-Street Improvements 102,000 TOTAL $1,371,770 NOTES: 1. No land acquisition costs have been added into these figures. 2. Due to the schematic nature of plans, it may be appropriate to figure contingency costs into the estimate of the total cost. I. t i I 1 A7 f r i; APPENDIX B i REVIEW & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS COOK PARK The Cook Park Master Plan developed by Murase associates calls for some modifications to the north bank of the Tualatin River and to a wetland area adjacent to the existing soccer fields. The purpose of this discussion is to give a preliminary indication of the type of improvements proposed and the procedure necessary to accomplish the work. The modifications to the bank of the Tualatin River will involve flattening the gradient of the slope along a portion of the bank io allow for public access to the river. Currently the riverbank is steep and does not lend itself to easy access by either pedestrian or boat traffic. This improvement will provide for fishing, > canoe and handicap access to the edge of the river. The slope will require treatment to guard against erosion due to changing river levels pedestrian traffic 4 and storm runoff. Slope protection can be accomplished by using concrete pavers similar to "Grasscrete" that allow for soil and grass to be placed in the , voids at the surface of the slope. The concrete will provide stability while the. vegetation will give an aesthetically pleasing appearance. F! The improvements will require a portion of the bank area northwest of the boat launch to be excavated and a gradual slope extended to the edge of the water. The material removed will be used in an area adjacent to the access road and turnaround. The excavation and fill in this area will need to balance so that no change in total flood storage volume is lost. In addition, the question of how this excavation will affect flood flows both up and downstream of this site will need to be addressed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to evaluate the impacts of these proposed improvements. The approval process for this work along the Tualatin River will include a joint submittal to the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. These applications will place the proposed project into two separate approval processes. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' permit will involve the evaluation of the impact to the Tualatin River floodway and flood plain zones. ' This project is not anticipated to significantly impact the floodway or flood plain.However, the grading will receive a close look by the Division of State Lands. This permit will heavily involve the Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife ' which will evaluate the impacts on the riparian vegetation and the wildlife habitat ii 131 i' i Items required for this submittal are earthwork calculations, mapping of proposed improvements, determination of "mean high water" and "ordinary high water" levels, elevations or cross-section views, existing shorelines, etc. The Division of State Lands and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may require additional items beyond those listed on the application, depending on public involvement and environmental impacts to sensitive areas. The wetland area under consideration for enhancement is just to the north of the soccer fields. It is proposed that the wetland be excavated to provide a deeper pond and the area planted with more diverse wetland type vegetation. This improvement will enable the present wetland to serve a broader spectrum of wildlife. Another benefit of this improvement will be the cleansing effect that the pond will provide for surface water runoff from uphill development. A very important item associated with the improvement of this wetland area will be control of the drainage into and out of the pond and its relationship to the overall drainage system for the park. a:. ' These improvements will require a joint permit application similar to the one discussed as part of the riverbank improvements. The application to the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will require a description of the proposed improvements, earthwork calculations and a preliminary planting plan utilizing plant species from the approved Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife plant materials .list. I I' G 3 r sp1 I. I i I I. B2 FANNO CREEK PARK The proposed improvements to the Fanno Creek Park include the creation of two backwater areas. One of these is located between Main Street and the proposed extension of Ash Street. The other is located just west of Hall Boulevard and behind City Hall. These areas are to be controlled by weirs in . the stream channel. i The larger of the two is located between brain Street and Ash Street and will require the diversion of water from the main stream channel into a new pond adjacent to the creek. This pond will require aeration by use of a water spray jet and introduction of fresh water from the Fanno Creek stream flow. This process could possibly be supplemented during dry weather conditions by pumping water into the pond from a proposed new well adjacent to the site. Flow of water from Fanno Creek into the pond would be controlled by a weir in the main stream channel, allowing normal stream flows to continue after the pond level is reached. Careful consideration will need to be given to flood levels and flow, both upstream and downstream, of this site so that this improvement will not affect those flows and potentially damage adjacent properties. Flood flow calculations completed for final design will consider the existing channel configuration and compare its flow characteristics to those of the proposed channel. These flow characteristics will be used to determine the flood f depth at selected points along the stream corridor during flood flows. The weirs will be designed so that they will not create restrictions to the stream flows during flood stage on Fanno Creek. The additional flood storage volume created by the new backwater area will provide a significant mitigation to the weir installation in the main channel. The second backwater area will be formed using a weir in the main stream ! channel approximately 280 feet upstream from S.W. Hall Boulevard. This pond area will be located in the stream channel and will be much smaller in size than the one upstream from the Ash Street crossing. Design requirements for this weir and pond area will be the same as those discussed relative to the larger pond. The main difference will be that this backwater area will be within the channel and will be used to increase the wetland adjacent to the stream and to provide a more diverse wildlife habitat. B3 :j Pi i In all cases, the design calculations will need to show that the proposed improvements will not alter the flood plain or the 100-year flood contours. This will be done by designing the grading such that, for all fill within the flood plain, there is a corresponding removal. No fill will be allowed in the floodway, and any structure placed within the park will need to be assessed as to its impact on the flood flows through the stream corridor. The permit process for this site will be the same as that for the riverbank improvements within Cook Park. A joint permit application will need to be made to the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers where equal weight will be given to the evaluation of the impact on the flood plain, floodway and the wetland habitat. Different from the Cook Park improvements along the Tualatin River, these proposed improvements will heavily involve the evaluation of both the flood plain and floodway issues, as well as the environmental concerns of those affected property owners and the Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife. Another state permit process that will be required for the construction of these ' ponds will be through the Oregon Water Resources Department. There are two permits required for this type of improvement. First, a determination of water rights will need to be made by a Certified Water Rights Examiner and an affidavit filed with the state showing the water rights for these parcels of . property. Then, two permits will be required. One of these will give the right to create the pond area and to appropriate water to fill the ponds the first time. The second permit will allow the continual appropriation of water to maintain the ponds. These two permits deal with the water rights for this property and will require additional mapping to show where the property is relative to a section corner or Donation Land Claim Line. This mapping will need to show the point or points of water diversion from the main stream flow relative to the reference corner or line. These permit applications will need to be prepared in cooperation with a Water Rights Examiner and will need to be accompanied by a certificate indicating that the property has the right to appropriate water from Fanno Creek. a, I~ B4 GENERAL COMMENTS Timing for the processing of these permits range from 45 days to 8 months, depending on the complexity of the application. The permits for Cook Park should only take 45 days to process, unless a private party or one of the reviewing agencies express a serious concern. Possible concerns will be relative to wildlife habitat and damage to the existing wetland areas. In both cases, a planting plan showing existing and final plantings would be very helpful to the Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife in their evaluation of the permit. If this information is supplied to their office, it could help speed the processing of these permits. Improvements to Fanno Creek Park are more significant than those proposed in Cook Park relative to the existing stream and the surrounding vegetation. These improvements will require significant documentation for review by both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands. Within the Division of State Lands' review process, the Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife will have the heaviest involvement. Although the proposed improvements are extensive, this permit should only require a maximum of 45 to 60 days to process. This proposal will make improvements to the Fanno Creek flood plain and floodway requiring careful documentation and design to verify that the changes in the channel will not change the flood flow velocity or depth, either upstream or downstream from the park. Because of the complexity of these proposed improvements, we would anticipate that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' permit will be more time consuming. Depending on the level of detail required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' office, this permit could take up to 4 to 6 months to process. The Water Resources Department permits could be the most time consuming of all because of the backlog of work due to recent changes in Oregon State Law. This new law requires all subdivisions of land to have their water rights established prior to recording. The Water Resources Department does not have a very large staff and therefore this last year has had trouble processing all the applications in a timely manner. This may change as their department is able to shift some of the workload to outside consultants. This application could take 6 months or longer, depending on the Water Resources Department's workload at the time the submittal is made. It should be noted that all permit applications could be processed simultaneously. This may help the agencies to coordinate their review and thereby speed the permit process. ( B5 APPENDIX C Cook Park Riverfront Improvements Additional work was done to refine the design of the improvements to the riverfront boat launch area at Cook Park. This area is one of the few access points to the Tualatin River and improving this area is seen as a way to expand recreational use of this river. Presently, the steep riverbank, limited developed area, and poor parking inhibit this area's usefulness. A number of refinements were identified by these efforts. First a fishing plaza and paved walkway were added to provide access to the river edge for the area's mobility-impaired citizens. The dock was relocated closer to the boat launch area to make it easier for for people to launch their boats from this ramp. The eastern end of the road was curved further to the north to provide more grassy sloped areas adjacent to the river. Finally, the boat launching and parking areas f were revised to eliminate unneeded road crossing by the riverfront trail. •i .i :i i~ j 1I` it C1 won 111 1 ~ r ( I 1{{ 11 1 S"\~ ' . r* ~ Itt N.,..m,.ee.m 1 IM ~1 1 1 ) e r j!i / LJ \111 t 1 { , 4 ~ 1:>> L. ✓ ,~~_~1 wl J y` ~y i 11!!t f y/!~ f vwvec.e tn.c 11f tit { 1 1 ' W f ~ .,r.., t .M,>J: !/r? !r! 1H 11 1 c...+ x~p• ' [N.Ima T».. ~e~iwi"^1 1'i' 1 ~ - J ~ ~ , ~f / ! / ~ ~ tuume wn ~e u• Pcmo..a v++• ow 1 ~ 1 ~i ? 19 ~ ~ / ' / P"'"rr ! ! Euuva weoGma (}i W'A i"1w ~1 1 talr+~ 1 i• ~~,/r'e 1 rte' \ © Nwl~ u Sl.bmi•e Ph.. B•n> ~ ,rti ( I• ~ 1111 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rr fir if// IN% COOK aNT 1{vutPl ~VEMENTS i RIVER J ~.~'%/ice/ ^~'7 ~ ice/ rr~ it r• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 23, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: January 13, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Single Owner REVIOUS ACTION: Local Improvement District f.~ PREPARED BY: Ed Murphy DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - POLICY ISSUE The policy question before the Council is whether or not the City should allow "Single Owner" local improvement districts; and, if so, under what circumstances. INFORMATION SUMMARY This item was discussed at the City Council's meeting of December 12th, at which meeting, the Council decided to allow single owner local improvement districts under certain circumstances. Those circumstances included a demonstraton of "public purpose", which could include the creation of new jobs, and a demonstration of minimum risk to the City. y ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED The Council may choose to adopt a policy statement as written, modify the policy statement, or reject the statement. . FISCAL IMPACT There is no direct fiscal impact resulting from the adoption of this resolution. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff suggests that Council approve the policy statement by adopting the attached resolution. br/8754D A/01 c~ c~ e-tQ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON rr RESOLUTION NO. 89-1 u A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR SINGLE OWNER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, t e City receives, from time to time, requests to form a local improvement strict in which there would be only one property owner involved; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to clarify the conditions under which they would be receptive to the formation of a single owner local improvement district; and WHEREAS, the City',. Council discussed their proposed policy at the Council meeting of December,\12, 1988, and directed staff to draft a written policy statement formalizine~,the oral decision of the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that the City will consider the formation of local improvement districts in which only a single property owner is involved under the conditions described below: Section 1: The property`is zoned and proposed to be used for industrial, commercial or %de ice development; Section 2: The applicant on strates the "Public Purpose" involved, which may include the cr ation of jobs in the community. Section 3: That the applicant demonstrate that the risk to the City government or the general taxpayer is minimized. As a guideline, the City Council will request the following: a. That the applicant\ provide an appraisal of the property affected, such appraisal being done by an appraiser acceptable to the Citi.,Administrator; b. That the amount to bs, assessed against the property not exceed 25% of the appraised value of the property; c. That financial documents be provided as required to the City Administrator which ~an demonstrate that the property owner has financial ability\to pay the assessment. PASSED: This day of 1989. ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard Deputy Recorder - City of Tigard br/8754D RESOLUTION NO. 89- ID Page 1 i J • I MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r i I i TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council Respond By i FROM: Cathy Wheatley, Deputy Rec rder For Your Information DATE: January 17, 1989 `Sign and Return SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 7 - Request from Nesbitt Associates for Waiver of ; Time Guidelines i i Attached please find a request from Nesbitt Associates as referenced above. This material was received just prior to issuance of the Council packet; staff will have a recommendation prepared for Council at the January 23, 1989 meeting. cw/8766D ' I Patrick M. Nesbitt Associates Inc. 5 S.W. Cascade Avenue. Suite 220. Beaverton. Oregon 97005 03-641-4984 FAX 503-641-5221 i i MEMO TO CITY OF TIGARD Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner Ed Murphy, Community Development Director Gerry Edwards, Mayor Valerie Johnson, Councilor Carolyn Eadon, Councilor John Schwartz, Councilor Joe Kasten, Councilor FROM Ken Eagon One Embassy Centre office building Patrick M. Nesbitt Associates, Inc. DATE January 10, 1989 SUBJECT REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF TIME GUIDELINES IN SECTION 18.30.030 OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'T' CODE. In response to a request by Nesbitt Associates on September 12, 1988, the Tigard City Council approved a waiver of the deadline for submission of application materials for a comprehensive plan change to a 3,700 sq. ft. parcel of land between the Embassy Suites Hotel and the Golden Key Apartments (see attached map). Due to circumstances beyond the control of Nesbitt Associates, we were unable to proceed with the comprehensive plan change at that time and subsequently missed the October hearing. Since we now hope to commence construction in late March and since inclusion of the subject 3,700 sq. ft. property will significantly impact our building configuration, we respectfully request that council waive the normal time elements outlined in item 18.30.030 allowing staff to schedule our request for the next available planning commission meeting. City of Tigard January 10, 1989 Page 2 We have discussed this matter with the planning staff and the Community Development Director. They felt it appropriate that our request be placed before council. We appreciate councils' attention to this matter and respectfully request your favorable consideration. Thank you, J. Kenyon Fagon JKE/akp