The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 08/15/1988 UPDATE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1988 STUDY MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call - Br and Ea absent 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items Announcements: Ed-65th Annual Conf. of Cities - 12/3-7/88. Boston Sc.-Commented on sound system and trewscript quality - gystem must be repaired 21 COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN DISCUSSION o Washington County Representatives - Bruce Warner & Mark Brown 31 TRIANGLE PLAN DISCUSSION o Community Development Di rector—LaValle Allen, Iry Larsen 4, TUALATIN RIVER WATER UPDATE o Community Development Director-Discussion - Council Support for meetings either an Arwgesat 17 2 pm, Hillsboro; & August 10 7 pm - Tualatin 5. ACTION PLAN REVIEW a Interim City Administrator Tentative Dates for Town Halls: 10/11 7 p.m. Fowler Jr. High 10/18 7 p.m. Twaality Jr. High 10/12 7 p.m. Metzger Elam. 10/19 4 or 7 p.m. Summerfield i 6. INTERIM CITY ADMINISTRATOR DISCUSSION o Inttarim City Administrator - CC consensus; currant interim CA arrangement working well. Areas of concentration Included setting up joint meetings with Beaverton, Water Dist.; keep 135th LIED on schedule; adequate park maintenance, bait control; mid generally -- keep CC informed 7, NON-AGENDA From Council and Staff 7.1 Review Discussion of SDR 00-15 & 00-16: CC consensus - will not call up for review; issues addressed. 7.2 Roeaivo and File Bull Mountain/Walnut Study - CC consensus - do not receive and file at this time., +schiviale as w wlCshop discussion item for language review (workshop 9/17 0-5/2eed cteeio® 9/24) 7.3 Investments for ICMA Retirement Corp. - LOC Res. No. 00-70 81 EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council wont into Executive Session at 10:15 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d), (e), & th) to discuss City officer selection, labor rola►tions, real property transactions, and currant and pending litigation issues. 9. ADJOURNMENT: 10:32 p.m. cw/S912D COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 15, 1900 - PAGE M 3 1011 ONE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate STUDY AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, AUGUST 15, 1988, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start f TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD, asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 6:30 1. STUDY MEETING: 1.1 Call To Or-der, and Roll Call 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN DISC;U'SS1ON o Washington County Representative 3. TRIANGLE, PLAN DISCUSSION A Community Dovelopmont Director A. I UALAI I N RIVER WAIL.R UPDATE' o Community Dovelopment Director 51 AC1ION PLAN RE:Vli'.W u Ir►ter•ini City Adminiatrator 61 INIE,RIM CIVY ADMINIti1RAIUR DISCUSSION o Int:urim City Administrator 7. NON. AGLNDA 11 E.MS: From Counc i 1 sand Stagy f 7.1 Roviow Discussion of SUR 08 -15 ii. 00 16 7.2 Roroivu and filo Bull Mountoin/Wialnut Study 8. CXI.;CU1.1:VE $E;GS'1ON: `fho i iiIard City Council will. �jo into Cxucutivw Session► undor tha provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (ca), (d), (e), 6 (h) to discuss City offic;ar• seluc.tion, labor motions, r►.+al proporty transactions, and curront and pondirn,;l litigation iss►aus, 9. AD:IOURNMLNT lw/aU13D ( COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 15, 1988 L PAGE 1 T T G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L 1 �n REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — AUGUST 15, 1988, — 6:30 P.M. i 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Council President, Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Jill Monley, Interim City Administrator; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY MEETING a, Council President noted the 65th Annual Conference of Cities in Roston to be held �)Qci;mber 3 — 7, lies urgod interested Council members to consider wvaa'ly registration for cost savings. b, Councilor Schwartz commented on tho poor, quality of a recent: appeal transcript, Hie noted the sound system must. Foo kept in good repair to 4s5csro quality transcripts, Councilor Johnson requesiod -a memorandum bo so%nt to the Plannin;l Commis%iion Chair, and Haarinys Officors roportinq poor quality in transc:.ripts. Sho noted that porsons who spoak from thou audience should sit, at the to►st,imony dock acrid spook into thin microphono. lntoarim City AdminiatrFator noted that tho sound system head boon aarvicod rocontly arid wats now in good working order, C, Councilor Johnscan ro quosted Lh+at tho Dull Mourstain/Walnut study nut bo rocoaivoad .and filed by Council at thiac t:imoa, Sho noted conc:orna with Aomo of tho stoat.omontu in the study. Shop abkod th&t Council spo nd tis►ao?, during a► workshop vo iit0on, roaviowing thoa document boforp officially receivoad arid filed by Council. d, City Criginvor aadvi.sod that the Boavoorton Council was holding :a meotinq on trnanaporteation lissups this ovoning. Iwo items under convidoraation woaro Adjac.ont to I'194rd: Now RrholI%/Old cchoIIu F'orry Road diacussion on oliminaatiriq the Y—intwrooc:tion and read roaligr►mant. Diocussion of some charges around 171111. noaar• Scarrvrito Road. 31 COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN DISCUSSION aa, Bruco Warrior, Director of l..and Urso arid Iransportation, nand Mark Drawn, Sontor Pliannor, wcor•oa prosont reaprossonting Washington County Transportation office. Mr. Warner advised that the County Tronsportation Plan Updates procovs would require invoalvomoant by all affected parties, He noted the County would be reviewing finaancirig options to r•e univea issues in cooperation with surrounding communities. 11l. Mr, Warner commented that the Washington County Plan Identified roads of county--wide importance. Some of these major road systems Included Murray Road, Durham Road, Beef Band Road, Pane 1 COUNCIL MINUTE=S — AUGUST 15, 1988 Jenkins Road. Baseline Road. etc. The philosophy of the County was that all jurisdictions should be helping to maintain these roads; therefore, these roads should be retained under County jurisdiction. r_ Mr. Warner- noted the City had accepted jurisdiction of Durham Road about a year and a half ago. This roadway carries heavy traffic and was of importance to the county-wide transportation plan. Beef send Road should also be a county-wide road according to Mr. Warner. tie noted Bull Mountain Road primarily services residential area arid, therefore, would not be considered to be a county-wide road. C. Councilor Edwards asked how cities could retain control over ramifications from activity on roads. For example, Durham Road was designated on the proposed County Transportation Plan m;+p as a truck route, Ne noted that thea nearby neighborhood and Tiq and Council had determined local a truck route was riot advisable becausa of residential and school areas, Mr, Warrior respondod that tho WAshinil.ton County Coordination Comn►itteo would deturmino r�k)aii a laosifie a►tions/jur isdii trans for tho overall ;food of the County. All cities would brave re;prosentAtion on t.hiu committoo, Iia furthor advisiod that it a►ay not bio for they good of tho root of the e:our,ty to hravo ono city deotermine policieou on a road which is important to thio county widio oyuteom. Ileo notod, hiowiaver, ho houi riot re coivood any complaints from any truckeor concurninq tho Durban► Road clavura, At; thio time, this was a controvcoraiol docioion, t. Council c:onvonoun wa►u that until aineothor' by.-pa►vo reautO c«un be dosignatod for trunk trraffir, it would bio Chia City'o dosiro to h4vu Durham Road romain c.lov od to truck trot f i c, d, Mr. Warrior not.od the bopnc:fits of prouenting roquantrd County road improvaomor►ta to thea St,,*J;io of +Ara(jon throut.4h a► i;uuporativu effort, to, Mr, Wiartipr odviood tt►ft financing would continuo to bo f probl€m. Tfiorio is nut. OrloulAh moncy avoilp.abla to improvo fill road# so dotirrod, f. Councilor- Johnson expruuverd conceorn that mratching funds through aithor thea •tato or feadoraal govarnmeant would be iiavor•aal yeaary owe.ay. She adviseod Mr, Wfrner that Council rocontly a►dopteod a rcavolution forwarding a ballot mtoavurea to Tigard votory concerning !n►provtments for Math Durham and Groonburg Rood, Chea juggostrad tt►fit if as city w;Aa willing to pity for road i.mprovem,ont>s, then the City should restrain jurisdiction, She exprevreod concern that roads such as Durham and Greosar►burg would not bei viewed as a< high priority by the County, Mr. Warner responded that it may be more appropriate for, County roads such ars Durtinin and Greenburg to roceive money from the County. Ne also mated that more financing options would be avaailrablo. Mr. Warrior noted that tie felt Cities would find that they would not be able to maintain the roads as the County has t found. Page 2 - COUNCIL- MINUTES AUGUST 15, 1988 g, Councilor Schwartz agreed with Councilor Johnson. Ne noted that the Tigard area of the County has not received much by way of contributions from the County. h, Mr. Warner commented that he felt the priorities would soon be shifted more towards this part of the County (i.e. , proposed westerly by-pass route). i, Councilor Edwards noted that tie agreed with Mr. Warner- in that trips per day on ,ome of the roads far exceeded the amount of usage by Tigard residents, Travel to Washington Square for shopping and travel through Tigard by commuters may indicate that these roads should be assigned to.) the County--wide system for assistance in financing for their ilia inter►ance. Councilor Edwards noted that he would not yet be willing to give up jurisdiction of these reads until such time as the westerly by--plass was completed. tie advised it would be appropriate for Council to continue to support the Nevombar bond issue which would provide funding for improvements on those roads, k, Community Dave lopmont Qiroctor noted that- Uur•hlam Road was now within the City of ligard'a jurisdiction and tho City WAS ru»ponsiblo for ils mtaintonaanco, Therefore, he :agrood CouncAl. should continue to support tho 1)ur,han► Road Sas a pr•o just on tho Traansport;tat:iun Safely Improvomont Bond moaasuro, Mr, Wiirnor aacknowlodgod that it would be at luaat a year bofora tho potontial priority list showing Durham Ru,ad Impruvoniont» Could bo lmplomontod, 1. Councilor, aohn►ton not.od tho trano i t routes in tho Plan do not %how a future transit rout.o aurvicing tho Tigard 1`rianglo Area, Sho further oboe+rvod that a holiport in beth tho 7riranglo Aro«a arid tho Traammol1 Crow dovolopmont should bu pleacod on the Plan'x mia K>. m, lhero was diacunsion on light rail . Mr, Warrior notod thea Sunaot Corridor Aisociaation doturminud that: to link tt) W,*#hingtyn Squinar" may ho mdvi►saablo, Mr. Waafflor' unt:0ur'PVJ0d Ct)(Ameil to n'"t. with Tri-Mot roprosontativ«a'a and bogIn participatirig in talks concerning light r-eai 1 , n. Mr. Warrior rovii►wad road funding options which included a local option vehicle ragistration foo or a fuel tax, Ho notcrd state govornmont had recontly boon suppor-ti.vo with rc+gard to considarat•ion of local options, o. Thore was discussion on Upper and tt►wor Boones 1"arry as designated truck routes. The City of Tigard is intprostod in classifications assignod to these roads as Tigard provides contract police services in the area. P. City Engineer referred to the "Northeast Bull Mountain Study." The County Planning staff haat' agreed to assist the City with traffic projections in the area. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 15, 1988 Q Councilor Johnson noted the interest of the citizens on Bull Mountain to "nail down" the transportation issues in their area as soon as possible. She asked for assistance from the County with regard to completing this review as soon as possible. Mr. Warner advised that he would ba willing to work with the City in determining the transportation needs for this area. 4. TUALATIN RIVER UPDATE a. City Engineer reported that the Departwent of Environmental Quality (DEQ) will be meeting later this week to discuss a proposed implementation schedule of water quality standards previously set, The Cities, County, Unified Sewerage Agency, and agricultural community would have to each do their share to meet thea goals, City Engineer advised that the City and County were concerned with Tualatin water quality but thea implementation timelines may be too short: and standards may require money which the local jurisdictions da riot have, b, Mr. Warner noted this was a major issuo for t.hQ cities and County, Nee advised that tho County has been working for w long time with regard to Tualatin Rivor water quality, Nee said that riot only is the implementation schedules arhort, but tho standards are hi.gt►, {1€e ro€.on►mondod re prouoritativ•l; from the Citiou and Cour►ty attond the hoarin�ls aced upoak with a unified vesico. The hearings are schodulod an follows; August 17, 2;00 p,m„ Millsboro — Court House August; 18, 7;00 p.m, , Tualatin City 14,41.1 C. Mr. Warrior advised that then County and Cities would be asking DEQ for more t,imea to pr,opar�o ve plan to decatiail Coots in relation to wator quality reasult.s, d, Mr, Warner nutod that the st,andorda would not be changed at this time. Ne advigad that the County send Cit:io.0 nood to do more work to determino Options Available, 1ho stp,ndnrdm may be too strict and unasttaina►blo. ra, City Eynginoor advisod thmt tho etandaards were goals fit this ti.me. if unattainable, thein it would be nocsessaery to "ravi.sit" the stondmrds. City Engineer noted that each City would be asked to complot.o a study. it would bo difficult for trach► city to individually implement their findings—thero aro eight jurisdictions for the Fanno Creak alone, City Eml4neer proposod that a unifiod, regional appromch would be more effective, 14e noted that completion of a County—wide study within 12 months was not feasible, f, Gary Ott, NPO 01 Chairman, reported his observations on the now requirements as follows: Page 4 •- COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 15, 1988. o Treatment for non—point source flows would cost around $40 million. o Every new development in excess of five acres would be required to have a treatment system. Cities would probably be responsible for managing treatment facilities. o Planning would be removed from the local jurisdictions. g, Community Development Director noted that the City has 90 days to complete a storm drainage facilities inventory. h, Mr. Warner advised that the storm water management group has begun their work. Their task shall be to determine whetter or not a storm water district should be formed. This work should be completed in about 18 months, i. Council President Udwards thanked Mr. Warner and Mr. Brown for attendinc3 the meeting. 5. TRIANGLE PLAN DISCUSSION a, Community Development Director, rvviow<,d hie momcorandum of Au•3ust 11. 1988. to Mayor Brian and members of City Courrc'.il concernirkg tho Triangle Plyn. Community Dovolopment Diroc:tor outlined the currant situation and identified what the City wanted to have happi�n in tho Trianglo Are (i ,e, . t.Ar<gats). Hc4 sutl�lauted oltornativo propotals for f roe+Ching the targets . b, Community Development. Director rc,ccoomwndod Planning ConovoisiJ on involvomont with the Tigard Triantglco Study. Nu foresaw shifting thio Plannirxl Commission rola to Jong.ran�ja planninj, focusing lest/ can rcogulatory issues, (This ro-julatory issues vx)u1d be shifted to a Hoarimis Officar. ) c, Community Dovclopment Diroetor reviewed a nwp outlinir*g Wth this Tigard and Lake Oswego Triarv3le Arpas. Tho Triangle Area of take Oswego was adjocont to T'igard' s Triangle and crusted an "hourglass" design. Community Development Director reported that ti the Lake Oswego Triangle Area was very active. Mr. LAvelle Allen reported satisfaction with that information cont,sinod in the August 11, 1988, Community Development Director memorandumetc urged that any committQa designated to study the area contain representatives from the Triangle Area to provide continuity with the raork completed over the last 13 years. 6 Mr. Allen noted that the original concept of the area included # five protected residential areas. These areas would remain zoned as residential as long as 75 percent of the property owners agreed to retain this zoning designation. Mr. Allen clarified that this was an informal agreement which was not allowed as pant / of the Comprehensive Plan by LCDC. He would like to see this 1 informal agreement maintained. Page 5 — MJNlCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 15, 1988 d. Iry Larsen, a property owner in the area, agreed with Mr. Allen. He reported that there were three residential areas left. e, In response to a question by Councilor Johnson, Mr. Allen advised that there was no desire for the residential areas to rezone to commercial at this time. Also of concern to Mr. Allen were the conditional uses which could be allowed in the C-G zone. Mr. Allen noted that ingress/egress transportation problems must be resolved before further commercial development could take place. He urged that the Master Plan be put int-a effect as soon as possible. f. In response to a question by the Community Development Director, Council consensus was for staff to pursue the outline as proposed by the Community Development Director through they end of the year. At the end of the your, a "load comn►i.ttee" would be determined, Prioritization of staff time on the Triangle Plan would be established at a Council goal setting workshop to be scheduled at the end of this ,year or 3anuary 1989. a. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 7,1 Roviow of Diroctor'si Dociuionu; ea. SOR 08-15 Von Domelcan/Looi jonja - Tho City Council oxprauuod concern over ut.aff'u a adminiotrtation of the City's policy roga►rding on-sit.o utorill dra►inago do tont ion. Community DovoIopme nt U roc tor roported in hiss August 12, 1988, momoraendum thaet in this e,raus►, utur,m wa►tor run-off would go directly ont.e► reaiIroad property. Staff wneourag o.d thea dovolopor to contact this rirailroasad to at le?+;►ut: notify them of hiu intent to disirhorjo run•-off onto their property, However. if tho rerilroad cumpAny uaid, "No," tho dowolopor would h+avu thea option to provido on uite dotontion, As staff undor•utandu t.t►ia situation currently, the dovolopor is notifying tho raailroisd of his intont to diuchaargo waatvr onto their prop01`4. b. SDR 88=16, Keay Pacific.; Council quotation from thea pre►viaus mooting- Why was on-situ dr•ra1n&9a ratuntic►n allowod as a developer's option? Community Dovaalopmont Diroctor rcported that the issues of drainaago r•etantion was r•asolvod—thin dovalopor would install drainage pipe? under 72nd Avonuo. Council que%tlon from prrvious mooting; Why wQr•ca the parking stall widths aallowod to ba reduc=ed from the stondeard 9' to 8' width? Community Development Director noted that the 8' stall width was allowed ass a minimum to allow the developer flexibility to work around the exiuting trees. All the parking was basically for employees. Additionally, the plan provided parking spaces in excess of the minimum number required; there should be extra parking spaces available, Tho AUGUST 15, 1988 Page 6 COUNCIL MINUTES -� Y } reason the developer provided space for extra parking was because they have more than one work shift. The site plan shows 1.96 out of the proposed 361 to be the full 9 foot width. The Tigard Municipal Code would normally require 2.52 spaces with up to 25 percent allowed for 6-1I2 foot width. c. After discussion, Council consensus was that they were satisfied with the content of the Director's decisions; further review was unnecessary. COUNCIL MEETING RECESSED AT 9:02 PM, COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:15 PM. 7. ACTION PLAN REVIEW ;a, Interim City Administrator noted the need for a Council workshop to discuss sevoral policy decision itt-mm3, Interim City Administrator also advised that th►u timelina for parka isausas sl'►auld also iso dotermined. Council di-c:ussod mothods for disaominat.ing information to cit.ixons concornin,3 park s, Tontaativo dates aelect+ld for potential wurknhop so:►siona wore as f of luwa: tat Choice: Septombor 17, 0 om--5 pn►, Shilo Inn 2nd Choice: $optombor 24, 9 am-•a pill, Sh►i to Inn 1 3:nturim City Administrotur• will coordinat.o with oboont Council mumbeors for tho moot1ni3 date, Siho will. also dovolup a tont,at.tve aaclonda. b. Town Ball m►,)otings for r•aviow of thou Act.ion PlArl wflr'O tontativaly out as full►,wa: Octobor 11, 7,00 p,m, , f"owlor Junior High October, 13, 7:00 p,m., Mottgor f.1omontary October 16, 7:00 p,m„ lwmlity 3unior• High October 19, 4:00 p,m, or 7:00 p.m. , ummer-fiold Roai&ntiaal Arc►ac, 9, INTERIM CITY ADMINIST'RAT'OR DISCUSSION aa. Interim City Administrator, noted earlier Council direction for an r early--August review of the Interim City Administrator situation. She tasked for Council review to determine which areas needed more attention, She reported a primary focus continued to be keeping the citizen newsletter schedule intactand noted the importance of disseminating information to the community on upcoming issues. Page 7 -- COUNCIL MINUTES -- AUGUST 15, 1988 i5. Each Councilor expressed satisfaction with the interim situation. The following items were noted as those which they held important: Set up joint .meeting with Beaverton ` Set up joint meeting with the Water District 135th LID process to be kept on schedule Budget control Continue level of park maintenance Continue to keep the Council well informed 9. NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. ICMA Retiroment Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan Resolution for the League of Oregon Cities to File Amicus Curiae Brief; Interim City Administrator advised Council that rotiroment coverage for Tigard's general and managemivrit employees has evolved over, the last: several years, Prior to 1986, those? two Sr,oups wore cover-od under art eithor/or situation whore oArh amployep-u chose eeither a City- paid IRA ora City contribution to doforrod compensation, In 1986, this oithor/or choices was ropleAced with a monoy purchvasee plaen whoroin they City contributes a designatod porcont to each omployoQ's account. b, Duo to uniquo lanquago in thw Ore►;den Suite) Contribution, the carri3r of Tiga►rd's doforrod compensation plaen has riot boon ably a to offor� stock invootm�ants to e?mployaas who chuao, prior to 1996, the deforrud componsat.iun option, In addition, ttiis crfifoctod ti current omployt*o% who do.forrod thoi r own e�a►rr►inga inti 'C i�1a►rd'a deaforrod cumponsa►tiun plan. This issuo was being pro%iontod to thea Stated Supr opio Court., Tigaerd's warrior, t.ho I.CMA _. Potiromont. Cor•puratie,)n, a+akod for t holp in gaining thea attontiun to t. tis matter by the Supre410 Court, °ahoy roqueested Tigard to quickly pass a reaaealutiun a►akiniJ the Lookguo or Orogen Citiws to act as a le)iad in submittinij a mond of thea court; briar, 'the tiupreme? Court filing dosadlino was August 24, 1988, C, Interim City Administrator rucommrrndod thr►t Council sappr'0v0 thw resolution as aubmittod in their- Council packet. d. RESOLUTION NO, 8878 A RFSOL.U1iON RL.QUESTINC Lrirtcur Or OR[-GON CITIES TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE GRIEF, 0. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson to adopt Resolution No. 8878. The motion was approved by unanimous voter of Council present. page 8 — COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 15, 1988 lo. EXECUTIVE SESSION a. The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:15 p.m, under the provisions of ORS 192.660(1)(a), (d). (e). (h) to discuss City officer selection, labor relations, real property �.. transaction. and current and pending litigation issues. 11. ADJOURNMENT, 10:32 PM Approved by the Tigard City Council on September 26, 1988, Deputy Recorder _ City of Tiga.r� ATTEST; : Mayor - City of Tigard cit/G�?�l3U i r page 9 — COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 15, 1988 i Pit UP i J� TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal R.O.BOX 970 PHONE is="4-0980 Notice 7-6698 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97071 Legal Notice Advertising BTTX OF TIG.ARD • O Tearsheet Notice 4,70r j ti PO BOX 23397 TIOARD, OR 97223 e D Duplicate Affidavit �988 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON. COUNTY OF WASHNGTON, )se. f,_ F?.1�1'P1� �F'TR11�1�3Df�t" being first duly sworn, depose and sa m ih Advertioln Dlrecior,Or his principal clerk,of tho�� j,,�i a newspaper of General circulation as defined in ORS 1631.010 and 193.020;published ats�.�� n min the $a county and state;that the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for—OlalZ—Ouccessive and conseoutivo In the following issues; Subacrib �ndsworn to a me this AUGUST 11 P$ Notary1 or Oregon MY COD IeebnExpire AFI+I Y � ,�► '�t' � J .�s � ate . #3'CY t�Qt3TtQL P. r, 1&i�T r l HAM � { -fn A . u CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 15, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: August 8, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: County PREVIOUS ACTION: Transportation Plan , PREPARED 8Y: Randall R. Wooley DEPT BEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0!h t REQUEST Evil BY: POLICY ISSUE Review of the County Transportation Plan. a.,,.,....�....�..,..T„.�..,�......��. �..T..^�INFQRtiAT'i.4N SUMMARY At the July 11th workshop nioot:inj, the Council reviewod tho draft. County Transportation Plan in saama detail and indicated a desire for at meeting Witt) County staff for further discussion on sovoral items. lhiat diacuas +,n has boon sets for August 15th. ALTE�RNAT LVh a,l"ONSTUE,R D . �., ��.......�..._..._...y,...._.. w,.,.,,,.,,...,.,,,....,.......................... ..,_.�FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION br/S371D W. August 4, 1988 t .. Bruce Warner, Director clWeIOWA mks% WashiuRton County Department of Land Use and Transportation OREGON 150 N. First Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124 Subject: Washington County Transportation Plan Update Dear Bruce: Recently, in a workshop meeting, the Tigard City Council reviewed in some detail the proposed Washington County Transportation Plan dated April, 1988. We are generally quite supportive of the proposed plan. We appreciate the great effort that has been put forth by the County staff, the Citizen's Advisory Committee, and others in preparing the draft transportation plan, and we are very supportive of the effort to coordinate the County plan with those of the various cities. The Council appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the proposer] plan. During our discussion of the proposed plan, there were a few areas where we felt that it would be beneficial to discuss the plan in a little more detail before we made formal comments. Tho issues which we would like to discuss in more detail includo road jurisdiction, the County-wide truck route system, and the recommended roadway improvement projects, including prioritization, timing of projects, and regional financing alternatives. We support the concept of a County-wide truck route system, but we will object to designation of a truck route on Durham Road until other road �. iwpruvements are completed, such as Tualatin-Sherwood Road and Phase I of the Westerly Bypass. Also, we want to recognize that study is currently underway on future alignment of the roadway system between the Walnut Street/135th Avenue area and Gaorde Street and Bull Mountain Road; we would like to be assured that the decisions that coma out of this study can be included in the plan when the study is completed. Finally, we are also concerned that Upper Boones Ferry Road in the City of Durham is a designated truck route and we question why Lower Boones Ferry can not be so designated to alleviate traffic through the center of they City of Durham. We have scheduled additional Council discussion of the transportation plan issues in the Council study meeting of August 15, 1988. It would be helpful if you or someone from your staff could attend this workshop discussion in order to answer background questions which the Council. may have. The meeting will. be held at Tigard City Nall, and is tentatively scheduled for 6:30 P.M. Please advise me or Randy Wooley of our staff, if you will be unable to attend our August 15 meetings. Thank you for your continuing assistance in coordinating transportation planning efforts throughout Washington County. Sincerely, "'O;�A-L.r-e..,.. Tom Brian Mayor ` ke/61981) 13125 SW Ball 6W.,P.O.Box 23397,ligard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171- MEMdRANDkiN CITY OF TIGARD. OREGM1 '!'O: Honorable Mayor and City Council August 9, 1988 FROM: Lorean Wilson, Recorder SUBJECT: Triangle Plan Discussion This material will be forwarded to you in a supplemental packet by Friday, August 12, 1980, lwla818D t MLMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON c, 10; Mayor Uri:en and Members of City Council August 11, 1988 FROM: Ed Murphy, Director of Cu;nmunit:y Developnlen SUIQLCT: Triant3le Plan As you tarts award, the City C:OU"It'il or►d St4;ff hav►► da aril ;a►ld fur same tndk ad .as 1W$ idea of complotin,3 a ",pl;an" fur the Triangle ,ar4,a, This 111011,0 is intende � proporation for tho workshop discussion on August 1E), It batsictally 4,ut;lin4�a the sit.uat:ion ds it: currontly ►aa,ists, trios to idont:ify what wo w:xr t to h.ippon in thju arola (we clan call tht?rl1 olJr' tar'trye � and !401110 altor'noto proposOl's for roachinq our tar'gats, 1h ,V,IUATI ON1, tau 3' und0r'ftand it., is tas f4sllow:: 0 'Thea Tr'iutngla «areata is 340 ,acrou 0 3b acr•er► art) zoned Rosidontial u 131 aLras iar�a run►ad t,0►nn►ar4:ial t r4afeassiorulll 0 173 acres are ,r4ar►Or! C:►,n►ln4+r't.l�al C+urlc�r�al l,huro taro 405 individual r►tar•cols o the overi'v3v ptar•col Biro is •114 acxe- o l'ha +avorcvp rouident:i-Al p,Arc.ol Sita is ,41 .acro, 0 A tjrxadv sch0ol is locoted ne+Far the seauth corner. 0 Much Oaf tho orejut ing eleaveal►.�pmunt is rk►%i(lontial, 1 ho oroa is sorvod by is substoridord stroot Wit e►n• q u W«atetr searvicea is tav"ailMblea in all oKiliting stroots 0 1ho s+ani.tory jowor cervico is Mtast.ly tndividutal septic riyst.4n►s, Main sowor trunk lino u ",aro "jonorally Avai lrablo to tela tri►rr►131ea 0ar0ok, 0 st+►rm dr•naintago faxcilitie?s taro, lr+cking. 0 A study is b�ain�l dune! of thra 711/1. 1 intor4oction. 'trafficpan"�alynis is ceamp]e.�tc►d; two ialtrd niativrls havo boen cho"ae�r► for further rerinement. 0 Thea Djr'tmouth LID haboon f0r►r►ad. 0 1ho onginvering plans forDartmoutt► i+rc� cemopleltead, 0 Lawsuit" have been filed on Dartmouth, but to data thea pr0jcacl; �Yppeanars to be "doak)10" starting this feAll . 0 A questionnaire naireas irod to wias con'Plnte!dwith Mia►rchr; Council,rocoive+.d 'copie,se�signed. o A quelstlran n NPO 4 roprosents the gar a<a, 0 the Economic DevolopmOnt Committee has identified tt►e Y"rirxngle area as a potential area of focus. 0 A Mormon 'temple is being built across 1-5, txs wel.] as an office building. v A developer has bought all the residential properties in the west cornor, and the Council has rezoned it to Commorci<al General. 000 een submitted by Key Pacific, it � square office wiill boa located inthe north cor nervoftithe Triangle, on 68th Parkway, ?Mayor Brian and City Council Page 2 August 11, 1988 The TARGETS are what we want to discuss on August 15. Following is what 1: would consider "targets." based on what I have read, heard, and observed. Generally, we want to: ► o Encourage high quality growth that is consistent with the plans and ordinances of the City, and have it managed and coordinated in such a way that the Triangle develops as if it were a single entity. o Have the Triangle developed to its "full potential," in terms of business development, but developed in such a way as to minimize the environmental damage, keeping a natural "park—like" setting to the whole area. Make it "different" in quality than other general retail or office areas. 0 Build Dartmouth Road as soon as possible. 'y o Ensure infrastructure iu devolopkd as or before prtG:ete development occurs. o Dc assured that the Comprehonsive Plan desitlnations, zoning, development standards, and facility plans aro "right" x or chango them bcifore it's too lata, ' o Prevent. overloading of utroots, o Croato clear policies nand st:;andarda to (juido dovolopmont. V o Eliminate diuincer!iives to dovolopmont . o t;ncour+agea hi13h quality dovolopmont that iu more "corporato" "landucwpod" "multistory" "multi—eau"" o Croatia a "uelf- rontainod" dovoloprnont "Flork" • including office, eattor►deAnt roLa:il, hotol, compuu induatriol , �r o Include the north side proportivu ilonj 99W au ;)fora of tho Iriongle. 0 Improves 99W to ►aura of fa Blvd, appoaranco. o Improve connortionu botwoon Iricanglo, dowr►towr�, .and Kruso—waxy. �Y 0 tae► able to uorvu the 1'64inglo with 'Transit yurvico, ,a 0 Croato larger developaabltp parcelu, or ovon "uupor-blocku." /c, u sonuibly deal with wot.liando and vogot..ation, 0 Werk with school Nutrict to dor.ido thea future of tho elrode school in thi.0 locaatiun. 0 Providu soma protection to rotidoritial propertiou in tho short term, but auaumea convorsior► to other uses aver tho lonfj Corm, 0 0 Keep public; facility mmintonance► costs eau low as practical . .zoo Croato a► "park" linoarl or weatla►nds; prravidea upon, rocro(ational dread for workers within the 'triangle► area, -.)I o Maker the Triangle area at.trActive to the priv,atea invostmont community a- more attractive in fact, than similar areas in other jurisdictions (i.e. , tho L&ka Oswego Tri+angla) . Y Mwyor Brian and City Council Page 3 August 11, 196a In order to accomplish these targets, the Council and Staff, working with committees or citizen groups. need to think through the "how's", "when's", and who pays issues. One way to start doing that is to outline some alternate PROPOSALS. Following are some proposals for starters: o Complete a study or "master plan," dealing with: facilities/transportation (July — Jan.) land use (March — June) a Do the study "in--house," working with a committee. o Appoint a lead committee (either NFO 4, Economic Development Committee, or the Planning Commission). _ I recommend using the Planning Commission u Study will not include — market analysis promotional materials ca Use standard financial instruments fear• public improvements (L1Ds, development installod, state grants) a Consider usin�j; — An "Economic lmprovomont District" for planning/promotional offort.s — Tax incroment financing for public improvomeantu o Use standard tonirq tools for seatbacks hoights lot si,ria (perhopu urt.tin4J a mini►+►►.►m lot sixo) u Considor ovealopintj special dovign st,Andards for the arc►a, ca klegir► ir►formal diuc►assicant; with tho .school Oiutr•ict rogording they future of Phil L.eawis School. o Begin informal to more tactivoly work with property uwne►rs to consralidate smallar luta into 14Argor lots. NOiL, l'hea staff's tabilit.y to spend times on thea °Iriatiglo will despond, to ra largo dQgroo, on the workload rotolting from changing an active planning a►roa, annoxations. tho lualat.in River w«atQr quality issue►, and then downtown, parks and t r,anspor,tation impruvam@nt pr•oljr•a►mn, At tho Council mooting, wo'd like to discuss the Council's in►a►+;1e of the future of thea Triangle, tho ra,lativo ur•gcancy of doing a study, tho fors ouoon "lout opportunities," and such t.hinslu as the appropriate lead cc>mmittoo and the timing, cost, and method of doin�l a study. Wo hops to coma to sumo consonsus as to whrat wo want to happen, and who's going to do what and wham to help mako it happen. I'vo invite►d Lir Newton and Randy Wooley to participate, as wall as Bill Monahan (E-OC Chair-parson), Loulso Stowart, NPO 914 chairparson, and La►VallQ Allam, past NPO 114 chairperson. I look forward to a good discussion with the Council on this very important: %roa of Tigard. sb/6013D cc: Jill Monley, Acting City Administrator Bill Monahan, EDC Louisa Stewart, NPO 114 Chair LaValle Allen, NPO 114 Past Chair Randy Wooley Liz Newton Y�� a v�/1 .•� L•'. T MEII Eit - OV _ . 972 �11Kt,, ,ty', �y'i1 � ��: 1 ^ '� ••rr 5�• r � ` 1- .r. � •\. l �t..;,r+` ar Z ♦ • - :., 3 ,L, a;`. rl j `,r�,A: ti �I 1 ag.•- �� 256 i ,� °� �� •v � � ..�t��-r t �Y1 -j �i � .c. a.�•"��Y_�y .tea'••,?� ♦' >r� yr `' 1 ° � .�. • f; • !� �. 'a ,.�7!'�S'S fu`J'V` , �`` •Jl� � 4 j 1 r *C � t `'s. I' 1 +.� n ls:. fY. �, • �,:` y i* • -"I I `1. -`--•yrj�s��.+..+• :_�• f Ri.',.: �t^ w -1 .,,. � a,�v'YS •�+, " Y ,.. .<t.;� "�``r ` `�•.•,,v �,, '.� �•� :.},:+�-u�, el�•�l .'o•'s"•, tj j„• 1 04 *^a --� �"7i.iT •L .;.t.•,.. �+v, �r •,� � 3"4 •="w`.'i::.J� t ,-`�e••r1 i�=� � �!' a �� a t ,.,., 1• ` + ^tat :' 4e. �aaa� ••,' a' +T• ,a,, ) �. •• . � ^ e�g,�a��71'd,�1�A-' r `' ��F yrl 1+� •_ t '. ..., j e 1,r71''"C-.=.--.� .j a• ,y w tv.�•ipti n.amti'��, r..1'M'i�rr,I• ..h'•N, Iwl ... +1�5 0 .-V ' - h ��►� ~' 'lY.. .::,,a,•,{(�t.l'', '+' ...i1.D• :�,n... � w � >j 1 � ,, 'i : i+ • 7 ••1 ' } r.r, , ., � _ �ylilr-nl.i ��'ry' Yt � ��,,.✓� + n i'# is 1, , ,e b-1 .. �y}n b_•. 1 r�"� ♦.y,t ,. hi: j •, Y• ,. �� -lir' r. • 1•^�,.+ D t- :a . �I4'� i 1 � � .rl, t.. w,.�.".. /` s �, � ♦,. / a! w'n .il. !v"7 R1'• /� '1�`^inr. •, vpyE�a„uv. t�+i " _ � ;'r. '� s.,..r• 1.✓ •� •S ... �;', { ,�. +."�� W„� o / ;"�"�-'��6��9' ta"r'S •t ,h,i+r; r'I'r'�v '� •~�• 1,,.•r �• «1 " •1 9,` •�'� IAVMM• • i �, W+�!4"'s' ,/ rL �ji' t 1� ..d IN 41, . .•• '� J., ' r�ri••rq, f" ,� NPv - w�i j 'Ir a1 4w r a �� f1i !'►< " � 1 +,� "` t trw .l,w iM'� rq w �� °' w, «i '/f l! � r.'M 1..>.J r ..�s.,.'�f�'+'�,,� ,y;�~�`'"+ ''�%•�• �'"' � :r'r J�," may`. � '''" ,yq+�� r °, r v ra a� :•fm. , •[ 1 k''w '� !1 + fig '• `� ss ar f* #� Aft 1 ,Y.rlr t•r• / 4� r .' r� t>f^y"� ri�r/ / r •r'-r `� ` adr•� rrr tom- rfn z�•.`►{� r ,rn 1 I' 1.'�ilr ,Y ry+ •r e,r•.w i • ..,31,�,�1;5„tr 1`� ': +•j'rr/ S r r^I a r`++.1��' '-' p � 0 .•i.at www• j, ► / ItIvEst AVO ...• t•Yr ROVE , r:• Ir, c d s t .VL•• �r 7 �, �, ..y f i �•,Y �Ifit TUAI. of :� ,his �• aY.�►• tir „� i n ae A Illi to ,fes '11M��j i.'.• !Wk•W � MYh•1 At low R, off � �„ �'," n ,�,r+• S � ... M' tr' v s ✓ � I 4• whrw / y • /1 '•'i i/ s .h°J •� i , '22000 ` MLIAM A. MONAHAN A"rn)R'%hY AT I..&W 1=W-,W.MAINS STUXIM TIC..ARM ORMONt 97UL3 sow ea�weou August 15, 1988 Edward Murphy, Community Development Director City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Tigard Triangle Study Dear Ed; Thank you for supplying me with a copy of your August 11 memo to City Council concerning the Tigard Triangle study. Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the City Council work session tonight. Although I have only been chairman of the Economic Development Committee for the past month, I believe that I have a fair idea of the Committee's interast in participating in the Triangle study. Over the past year the EDC has devoted a high percentage of meeting time to providing input to staff on the Triangle issue. For instance, the Committee has become familiar with base data and assisted in the formulation of a questionnaire designed to get a better idea of property owner expectations and plans. The Triangle issue has been a high priority of the Committee and is seen as the top project for this year. Your memo to City Council asks for the designation of a lead committee to undertake the study. Of the three possible committees, the IDC in the most logical for the following reasons: 1. Resolution No. 87-43, defining the role of the EDC, states in section 4 (f) that the "EDC shall &sraint the Community Development staff in the development of the Tigard Triangle Plan". The EDC and City Council discussed this project in depth at their last joint workshop. 2. When the EDC was created by Resolution No. 83-103, the Council identified the Triangle as one of four target areas. The Committee has monitored activity in the Triangle mince formation. 3. The EDC has spent the past year working with staff to become familiar with the Triangle issues. Another Board or Committee would have to repeat the process of orientation by staff. 4. One member of the EDC was selected specifically because he represents the Triangle area. The Planning Commission does not have a member from the area. Although NPO 4 is t 1 completely composed of representatives of the area, I feel i that it is not as accountable to the Council as a standing Committee will be. 5. The EDC has built a strong working relationship with the members of thR long range planning staff who have been involved in the Triangle study - Liz Newton and John Acker. 6. Neither of the other Committees identified has the proper focus, representation, or charge from Council to adequately perform the task. NPO 4 has been one of the City's most active NPO's over the past six years, however, it is composed entirely of citizens with a vested interest in the outcome of the study. The Planning Commission has a heavy calendar at all times as they conduct land use hearings throughout the year. Acting as the lead committee of an area specific long range planning effort probably will not fit into the Commission' s schedule or areas of expertise. In conclusion, it appears to me that the logical choice of a lead committee is the EDC. The EDC was involved in the early stages of a similar study, the City Center Plan Task Force effort, it is up to speedon the conditions and issues of the Triangle, and the members are interested in the project. Perhaps the next work session of the EDC and City Council can be devoted to the creation of an outline of the tasks that must be undertaken to answer, the remaining questions raised by your memo. I hope that you are able to attend the EDC meeting tomorrow to report the Council' s action on this matter. Sincerely+ r William A. Monahan 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 15, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: August B. 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Tualatin River PREVIOUS ACTION: Water Quality Discussion PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley DEPT NERD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUES'1kU BY: POLICY ISSUE Discussion of Tualatin River water quality issues. INFORMATION SUMMARY In your Council mail of August 8th, you receivod a letter from tho Unified Soworage Agency and notice of upcoming hearings by the Dept, of Environmental Quality (DEQ) on implamontation of water quality regulations. At the August 15th workshop, staff will ba propared to discuss the proposod DCQ regulations and potential in►pacts on tt►a City of ligard. ......,,.......... 1a,1,T'4"RNAI"]VF,.;�CON�]DCRF�EI FF"y)CAI; IMPACT ��. :...W.,.�...�.._................W._..........._..:..........�._.............,_...W...SUGGESTED- ACTION br/6371D SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UPDATE #2 Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) July 27, 1988 This is our second Status report regarding the proposed surface water management effort in Washington County, in this update, we discuss DEQ's efforts to address pollution from stormwater, the repayable grant agreement process and consultant selection. IMPORTANT! Cities and County impacted py Proposed DEO Stormwater Control Ru es ep On July Be the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) presented to the Environmental Quality cemmission (EQC) a more stringent and :such expanded version of their original nutrient (phosphorus and ammonia nitrogen) control rules. This version includes new sections on city and county responsibilities for controlling pollution from stormwater. While the EQC did adopt the more stringent controls, it delayed until _September 9 a decision on the compliance schedule for meeting—tom-- cont'rols and the portion of the rules dealing with city and county responsibilities. This gives cities and counties some time to review the proposal and assass the impacts on their jurisdictions. Two public hearings will be held prior to the next EQC meeting: August 17, 2 pm, Xtilisboro August 18, 7 pm, Tualatin The attached DEQ notice gives addresses and outlines the proposal . Cities and the Count should Pay close attention to the it®ms sEarfing w t . No @ o type o wor rs:qu re an a time tames:. it is important that Washington County and the Cities understand that the storm drainage related work required by the now rules is tar beyond the scoC of work for our- joint USA County Cities surface water mane ement effort. we urge the county &no all the C as o Secome award of tRiQ require ments and the impacts: on their jurisdiction. surface Suter Management Process On bold The City of Beaverton has; not yet taken action on a repayable grant agreement to help fund the proposed USA/City/County storm and surface water management effort for Washington County. Because the City represents a large surface area and would have major impacts on two drainage basins, we feel that we must know their decision before determining if the program can proceed. C Project Team Ready To Go When We Are Although we have not hired financial, facilities and public involvement consultants, we have an excellent team waiting to go on this project. From a field of thirteen interested firms, Dames and Moore/URS Consultants emerged as the team that combined a great deal of surface water management Axperience with ai, excellent public information and publi.- -evolvement proposal. We look forward to working with them. Information and Publications Available Call Barabara Cameron or Debie Garner at 6488621 to request copies of the following Information Sheets: 41 why Address Storm and Surface Water Management in Washington County? N2 Nonpoint Source Pollution #3 EPA Regulation of Storm Drains ouestions? Comments? rf you have any questions or comments, please call Dobie Garner (Public involvement Manager ) , Chris Bowles ("technical Manager) or Bob Cruz (rrogram Manager) at 648-8621. Attachment: DEQ notice of public hearings on compliance schedules and stormwater control requirements. F0,goA n Department of Environmental Qualityty CHANCE TO COMMEN A ON A • COHPLIANCE SCHEDULES FOR TUAIATZN =Ls Nearing Date: Wednesday -- 8/17, 2:00 P,M. Thursday -- 8/18, 7:00 P.M. Co=ents Duet Friday, August 19, 1988 WHO IS All businesses, residents, industries, and local governments AFFECTED: within the Tualatin River and Lake Oswego Drainage basins. WHAT IS The Department proposes to add the attached language to the PROPOSED: special policies and guidelines contained in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter 340, Division 41-470(3), The proposed languago provides a compliance schedule for p.chieving the Total Maximum Daily Leads (TMDLs) sat for ammonia-nitrogen and total phosphorus in the Tualatin River, describes flow and temperature conditions in the Tualatin River for which the TFEDL should apply. and includes the Lake Oswego sub-basin within the rule, { WHAT ARE THE On July 8, 1988, the Environmental Quality Cammission adopted rules HICHLIMITS: establishing special politics and guidelines for the Tualatin Basin. The new rules sat standards for ammonia-nitrogen and total phosphorus for the Tualatin River and major tributaries, but do not include a compliance schedule for achieving the now standards. The Commission authorised the Department to go to hearing on additional rules which would contain the compliance schedule. The proposed additions to the now rules include a time schedule for all counties and cities within the Tualatin Basin to develop plana to control the quality of urban storm water within the.urban growth boundaries of their respective jurisdictions. The amendments also include provisions for Clackamas and Washington Counties to recommend a management agency for dealing with agriculture nonpoint source pollution within the basin. Also included is a requirement for plans to be submitted by the designated agricultural nonpoint source agency to control water quality from agricultural activities, Finally, the proposed amendments include a process for the Ca ission to review and approve all submitted plans. The Department is particularly interested in receiving comments on the following issues: 1. Should there be a date specified in the rules for the j, plans to be implemented and the criteria to be met? What is an appropriate date? Should specific technical FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: s all S.W.6th Avenue Contact tris person or division identified in Ow pubiiC notice ter cat�ng 229-rs696 in tiv9 Portland area To avoid tong Portland,OR 97201 distance merges from otiw parts , tato.tali 1-800-452-4011. „n� luv C I information be provided to support selection of a final fi date? 2. Should the counties recommend a designated agency for the agricultural nonpoint source control plan? What agency should this be? 3. Should the final approved compliance schedules and water quality control plans be codified in Oregon Administra- tiva Rules? 4, Should the criteria for phosphorus and ammonia-nitrogen apply during a specific time of the year or should criteria be regulated by specific flow and temperature conditions? The Department will accept public comment on the proposed additions and 1ud3to special lisdguidelines oi AR 340- 4 -470( ). ThPro osedlanguage for additionsand amendments s attached. HOW TO Public Hearings to receive comments on the proposed additions and CO!'1l W amendments to OAR 340.41-470(3) are as follows; ore, am Wednesday, August 17 Hillsboro County Hearing Room 2;00 P.M. County Administrative Office, Room 402 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, Oregon Thursday, August 18ualatinTSeniorn enter 7:00 P.M. 8513 SW Tualatin, Oregon The Department will accept written comments received 'by 5:00 P.M, Friday, August 19, 1988- Comments should be addressed to: Mr. Robert Baumgartner Department of Environmental Quality 811 SW 6th Ave. Portland, OR 97204 MEXT SUP: The Department has been directed by the Environmental quality Commission to bring these proposed rules to them at their September 9, 1988 meeting. r_..F UH2822 Attachment SpECIAL pOLICIES AND GUIDELINES 340-41-470 (3) In order to improve water quality within the Tualatin River subbasin to meet the existing water quality standard for dissolved oxygen. and the 15 ug/1 chlorophyll a action level stated in OAR 340-41-150. the following special rules for total maximum daily loads. waste load allocations, load allocations, and implementation plans are established. (a) After completion of wastawa.ter control facilities and implementation of management plans approved by the Commission under this rule and no latex' than June 30, 1993, no activities shall be allowed and no wastewater shall be discharged to ttie Tualatin River or its tributaries without the specific authorization of the Commission that cause the monthly median concentration of total phosphorus at the mouths of the tributaries listed below and the specified points along the mainstem of the Tualatin River, as measured during the low flow period between May 1 and October 31 of each year, to exceed the following criteria: Mainstam (RM) ug/1 Tributaries ug/1 Cherry Grove (67.8) 20 Scobgins Cr. 60 Dilley (58.8) 40 Gales Cr. 45 Golf Course Rd. (52.8) 45 Dairy Cr. 45 Rood Rd. (38.5) 50 McKay Cr. 45 Farmington (33.3) 70 Rock Cr. 70 Elsner (16.2) 70 Fenno Cr. 70 Stafford (5.4) 70 Chicken Cr. 70 (b) After completion of waateweeter control facilities and' implementation of management plans required approved by the Commission under this mile and no later than June 30. 1993. no activities shall be allovod and no discharge of wastewater to the Tualatin River' or its tributaries without the specific authorizatiAn of the Commission (s)+all-'be-aellewed) that causes the monthly median concentration of ammonia-nitrogen at the mouths of the tributaries listed below and the specified points along the mainstem of the Tualatin River, as measured between May 1 and November 15, to exceed the following target concentrations: C ' WC3508 r I Mainstem (RH) ug/l Tributaries ug/1 Cherry Grove (47.8) 30 Scoggins Cr. 30 Dilley (58,8) 30 Gales Cr, 40 Golf Course Rd. (52,8) 40 Dairy Cr. 40 Rood Rd. (38.5) 50 xcKay Cr. 40 Rock Cr. 100 Farmington (33.3) 1000 Elsner (16,2) SSA Fenno Cr. 100 Stafford (5,4) 850 Chicken Cr. 100 (c) The sine of tributary load allocations and waste load allocations for total phosphorus and ammonia-nitrogen can be converted to pounds par day by multiplying the instxeam criteria by flow in the tributary in cfs and by the conversion factor 0,00539, The sum of load allocations writs load allocations for existing or future nonpoint sources and point source discharges to the mainstem Tualatin River not allocated in a tributary load allocation or waste load allocation may be calculated as the difference between the mass (criteria multiplied by flow) leaving a segment minus the mass entering the segment (criteria multiplied by flow) from all sources plus instream assimilation. (d) The waste load allocation (WIA) for total phosphorus and ammonia- nitrogen for Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County is determined by subtracting the sum of the calculated load at Rood Road and Rock Creek from the calculated load at Farmington. (e) The Director may issue new waste discharge permits containing additional waste load allocations and approve nonpoint source activities containing additional load allocations for total phosphorus and ammonia-nitrogen provided the Director finds that the ALyern �,Y gff rP besr�efitiA' EISA = �.11i��..Cr►"'......:':.i�errc��"'�. 1�..�Sid�' 0. 99'� 11 wMe 8 y,17 nor exceed the concentrations specified in sections (a) and (b) gL;.ih.�. [will not be exceeded.)' III w hin 90 nava Of &b& ndo2ei4n of Lbese 0124 he UnUf�e►� ti r n Age v�o . W ehl� M,ro Goer ehAl uubmit a -!An-a�d_t me ;zR.3SS �.4_...� +, d s lib ny hew► An _VhM_t rai11 4 . It's�aewa ige facilities e-r, �n� y with this rule. '>rhg than 1 aT sLn�i nn tfLA sched+1le for devgloering and mana¢eenM=..2"n_un"� +mana&jeem,-nr..wirh th .eek /� '_-- ••-a+eaS n+3 Bance algn�v_rowths_1s>L. . V�e!�� fliTffl3.'ACie) Zfl=�ay.e tl$..� � Q�WA�O� f WC3508 - t va months a to the ado ti n o these rules was An tonandColac Clackamas Cas shalluntesubmitm andthlansca do timed schedules within these o cant o i the ualit of to wate d SC in ed to ublic Waters n the alatin River subbasin ram wit nobs o owater ou da ies a a s a sow aW the ua i Mae the o cant a o s ac ed In W e oto ed � s (al �+�d [bl of this ru s. t des . e aun as ma sub t of t A s t o ; C es a d o � ..h 3211133 shall ins uda �. ' — to As a . a d 111 an o a sawa a ver and Ve o d A A o a e ad to a -a a is W b a A d P A Ceu 4 awa s a a a A e c n . W ed a d o a ata Pe o udD a ac a D , e pWe A eri,1AsrCon CounTY And th�1SD city Ji -r'riPP sYAtef�g uLl �,., t arC h a iniilea_ Dvo D a c e d a 51102 r. � �..w�ar�np CALlL1�Y��irC.'.Y�aL?4�'iV a nrefl�t"- ��vslar � ded ifl� stQrmwAr.e�r_�'2I1Z .'� r �►.�a rote 7'h_�_ Q e�s11 C ,^nmen Sf1F, !ye (5) L.bx ^S '---.a_ fuainf�cf�naa and �t t ie�r1 tide a,1f�a r C�ns2.ii�� i�,+r�. fhQ_Ce�nprol AY_ LO r*w � � Uf111��1,1w �"nr R!f►Ph"Yl�.�a� ,�. d p a�nri A$ th@gCN �1 �h� Cd'111S1t. .,..ti•.. on d�yg 4� tea ndoo�s @ �OAr�JIl�IIre x�mr Rnrlud A dU&�LiT1 ontO r�nr► a�s�tb_�n_�,lt^� ara' A.. 1 And usg_�5tA,3,11� O arwwPinrilt �A�_.� - p d P C rtty whiCh� sotbe. ,c u ty_or �4�c�ttar�P�dl Z�,� anothtY _�.'�til. Ot.�SS�G.. WC3508 The Depar60 day's of suti�ission of the interim t Inventory report requested in this section make an initial distribution of waste load allocations and load allocatio s for urban stormuater discha as and a ri ultural and oche ttonpoxnt sources T'hesa Snit+■t t Oads Ara to he used by the counties cities and desi smated management agene es In..daVal Dire-final -- - e a was a oa at ons and oad a o a d me a endo �orat n• v be aced a o a e e of agree me is as deter ;nad by the Ccssion. s a 9 ado n o t as a as t a d p '��5enna an ate o a en es w t G1acl.amas Countie s D� - au ca u e o 0 e a r e ns aball i o om u t e e e +nt seurce Sys e_wrhe rar�. .r+ded mean v t$rou is E34�k'o of the e e Run ' h. fief' �d e21 rhe £t*+dI)D.0 A�..t1°a llanthe- for, �arptma t the e O A A A OD—r.9 """ ti4••s•+renrnental (?«=licv .e Via$ .:11 f...ot tQ ' R;-e�".L. UV-bin 109 OntalILA a •�¢r,atAd �anc,�s�ll I�' I�' A se'hatluLA to e�ha bm�t__� geoMjus_l n+for » h{e• n� a rAg1ti�rA r+n s e this a abill-I ®n invAnm= of thA tae Can ,-xt a� aQa n��< t sA�3cb A d --R bas nAram l��t;�n�.4�:rt.•.,■ (RUES) ro_can rol t)3taA i)i��Ar�e�s �, An imnie+maAnCar-ion achA u�,A��. ,�nd� A rrnrag■ fe s±Val l'Agg g:�° 'fie iyA arse e€ the nr2SXAm and ��++� tl }SNpAvt ; �. The dU asion ahall revicy ail nlxrts xrl■n nrn fl md� r and ��zntY ns r�g}}j,re� b ettL.inns [f1. (g) an 'o flan . wfh,r°e, •ny 2lan tyr—AIM2=-42' on tassui.tgsl 12y A i 1 fn.fltAQ &h 2nr2yad by tha E=lr nmenUl. fst9al t�'V �07pi1�i.lEAs011� 'ori 4 i ■nL cominonAnli '�""."" �ritl� .irwv ti�rrte�tltti_d. JOU ,�t„■...� �S . gs o �rnusent eo th�Qrg,Ps33 Ahl m adopted a.A M&I t UC3508 � . . Icl thin one hundred twenty (11Q) days of submittal of the clan or agency-designation and within sixty (60) days of the public hearing,, the Environmental Quality Commission shall all;ber approve ogreject the plan or designation. If the roma ss' 6n rejects the plan or designation it shall specify a compliance cchedple, for )resubmittal. for approval and shall spegify the reasons for, the raiection If the Commission an arearengy has not made a good faitb elLolt v de an a2grovable plan within a Baso ab e t .a the COMMIsslon ay.invokg gRRr*RrlAt2 as all.gwed yMdal law, e CommlssiojLgball reject the plan if it deteXMIres J;bat the plan will loet meat-the reumixemanil of ibis nileta a najonabj& amount me a GaMMIgsign lhalle e a .gonay dalignagion if IS dararMings the agancX wguld not be Able toca_nduct an cffactive nen22int source prod a u d e A dAXA Of ARRMAI Of OAch Rlanand Sim* schedulg Xeaui,Xed by sections (f) , (n) ander) . the gigniftea -2 n e Shall bg e w .e dfaCharva 20=1t ISIMeda m2i4:.xalm of agroami-ni; Xftb the ai Agr. d e =- CRUnty.2r agAncX- no gg mis gr J4omoSAII um of atmomprit shod Include angr2ndat2 HAg&g 1. 12nd Allg .at gol ad lga!d All2g&&Ionj nailtent with rhe RXoXigtona of this )allo. Tho A of-wits 9 memorandy M gf Arm Ment-MIlL, ct dA rminAd bv ,the Csaion when _ tha Ran is anR12ved. (1� G2=jggj,ggalk}ill nettlI„nro-,-plgn fMDX.tMtntAtjM completiongehadning rggULXgd %jDdgr ROGE12no it) (a) and (i) of this rule A theC„�1ai,on fl.ndo tbat to moot rha .lune 32. 1493 drtA will ghee UprAasonabIg Ityt d n u2nn the count,►,etty or dcrgiglated ng�ag ,Ment ago@n y 7n nakins this finding the CRMnisjUn_s�haii cons idettg fDj,� wing factara_ JAI The fiscal burden_placgd Upon-the pr ci.ty� demignAted m'na to stn y . f& ill f -iility,construct parigA,, M TLma�pnrind need -d to raiseShe Fundn r!*ded to iM21ement tIM X021111,24e n. - — M jbe commitment made and good: 'fiinni�h gi p t exh b d� jbj iXi tz to orbtain aecngs to 1 a d ntc [�.8 to imnl�rug; .� ¢ey�elooed.. WC3508 .iU Within 1.80 dans after adoption of these -'ales the De ar e t w ve,lor appro�+.r a e rules for submission to the commission for : Issuing stir ate( dischBrea oet�it-s dor new developments of five ac3ceso e e u de t o ne B e •c But o under pRS 468 720 These x�v„les will provide Guidance to the counties and qtr es in their development of uxban sto�mwater program SUGGESTED AIUMMMM TO J=STING RULE. UNIFIED SEAM AGE AGENCY: 340-41.470 (3) (a) ... when aireraze weakly flow is less ...maasurad [during the low flow gariod] (3) (C) ___ _ " ,. lass flow is ,,=*asurad [during the low flow period) - _� .., I.Ie t?3nn S00 c f.g.Mod ev_a„�r�48,'3- tOMRo�sW'a 'I` x.+PAtOl than--?0_C (Nota: Proposed replaced language is (bracketed) and proposed now langus3o is SA •) %.. S=M-Ili AC 'S TO MSTINC RULZI 1 AKE O.'4Ll= CORPORATION 340.41-470 (3) in order to improve water quality within the Tualatin River subbasi.n j,nc�Ldin.� 4.alCa� dss��g •, , f WC3508 ! . atNaav:ffiWir YY XxAxLL•t3N.M to r • INION Washington Co. threatened • by environmental lawsuit • Py Dennis Darby Aa m4 Interested in nitrates could potentially cresta County has to pay unspecified would sive rho river say clearer buildia Aomas is Washington even a treater problem with lstal costs of Iy NERC Casa canaPPa achieve but It is likely USA Couaty a the future should Coke tower water flow. The plain whlch can cafy prove Wirt can achieve that goal,They can• note of a potential major probe facts are than whenever You didn't aced to be proven in the not achieve, however. standards the lean between the Unified Sower- have slow moving or non•movins first pplace, if this seems confuse that era exceeded duo i out Northwest A8aaaY (USA) sad the water, sunlight and nutriaats. ing, it can only be because It storm caster problem without Northwest Environmental Do- you got altao sad dirty looking doesn`t make s lot of sense,That `vitlima`tat Rlvaa outfall g[tc (ease Center(NERC).The NERC water. You should know. It, it doesn't grill You 4006144r has filed a notice a Intent to however.that the water Is not a that a successful suit by the, Gary 1Kramor, the USA director y tui (arid settee is required by health hazard and even today. NERC could result in a complete a system to pump the outfall Federal lave) WaBhinstoo Couaty hundreds of p40010 will ' moratorium on now lower from xAe Durham plant [o [h4 and Its asoneY(USA)for exoandy blissfully swim In Lake Oswe o hookups until the "problem' is Willamette would cost about ill Dag Fedora) standards with roe unaware that they aro hsppi�y solved. milliaa sad a system to pump the /pact to the USA sower effluent splashing is the outfall of the S19C4 the NERC would Corn s rank 4Ytfa1P (over bolas released Into the Tualatin Washington County Sower system, like to limit growth in the arca. Cornelius ldliw Ata) to oho Willaate 70 ]River from the )tock Creek. perhaps this Is their hidden would cost b8tweon itJO•S?0 Durham and three w441•couaty asides hrvlag to deal agenda. Not a bad idea. if You million. In total, to meet sawor pinata. with a slaw movies river to want to $hut everything down. standards that are only briefly parry away Its treated outfall, Simply sue USA for not meeting 4/6004444 and of so real eavi• The suit by NERC has USA has a problem eta Another standards It could never most roamental threat would Cost up Ca re$wesoatod ae an effort to with its present system and use to.S90 million, or around S$50 feol a perceived pollution front. In the winter. storm water the courts to stop new rawer for every rate paying customer problem in the Tualatir River d�rtste periods or Aewias taint hookups. if gist 14 not the real In rho USA system. will dJlute the bacteria content and Lake OswaEa (Lake Oswego p agenda of the NERC why have Is a man made lake drawing al• outfall lasts eaoaao4 Point Where the t"111 he not contacted either the This whole diseus0oft MAY most all of Its water from the US or the Couaty to attempt a Tualatin River), Tits Tualatin standards.While this Aappeas Ica oa•le is . s 1 ! m eo� rather technical a , r• tAaq_a p4Caao4 a( sYl! f4ib> e but (t won't seam River is not a elver �aayoaa.., Ir"' l�ti� �9 would voluntarily Jump into for th rliret"•II"�sa with river "polluilon.• would crow topic, When It dans Asppen, great Y quite as mundane it the NEDC a swim and It has 1484 average dJtutlmt the nonatrndard they not first attempt to resolve at&nese) to gni a Court decision fall then the Mississippi (one of effluent tAnY still as ed it out of court? For whatever against the County, This could the world's flattest rivers la standard). NEDC has discovered reason. the NCDC waste to get DO the nett'$ brightest and most other words. t has some o the this ereeptioa sad 1$bs$lag thele USA and Washington County In active economic area out of qualltiee of a linear swamp. proposed lawsuit on tel$ court and use their admitted bnsine$s for an indefinite"tied. Daring the summer. over particular issue because they ossa problem$agaiaet there. liopefutty. USA and Washington half the flow In the Tualatin U win and receive attorneys fees County can find a solution'that pprovided by the outrrll from under the Federal law$ that are NOW, what can USA and will avoid litigation of a vary iJBA•$ plants. 1toU outing) lenient in providing eompen• the Count do to resolve the complex and costly issue. The contains phosphorous and entice far Ictal cone for eavi• County ammonia nitrate which sation for lawsuits. problem? fieside$ hevin to deal red problems ore.more politiCat contributes to a green &Igoe with this lawsuit the E (State than technical, topressure from Environmental 4uriJty omm18• this and other , formation in the river.The algae CCC eeled I p would be present without USA's in other words, NEDC' $Ion) has mandated that USA who would beeaft srou r some of the contribution but to some lesser goes Washington County for must rind a way to reduce by 90 cost,of this issue might lead to a extonL Without USA. the river exceeding standards that percent the phosphorous it re- resolution we all can live with. would urraetpractically dry up In ecenh( they 'have lessee in river r (tht t !r tMe IOdd hesmmmesdmusee xedigwith caue) andhe' stl$ debatablewhether aNBAMP President. L MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 100 Honorable Mayor and City Council, August 9, 1988 FROM: Jill Manley, Interim City Administrator-J SUBJMT: Action Plan Review/Discussion Attachad are copies of the Action Plan and detail sheets, These include adjustments basod on feedback from council and staff on tho "flip flop" of Parks and City Center, iasues, 1 :am concerned about citieon review/foodback on both of thi:ae isuues loadinil up to their alectiuna, With the Tranriportatiun alection in early Novombor, immediately followod by the holidays, wo don't have a lot of tine fur an ideal "infora►ation loop" flow. I need your idoAs on this issue, it soems we hawe the following choiceu: 1 , An information loop as wo aro using in the lranspc)rtation isuue: a, Cummitteo recummond,atiuns b. Nvighburho;ad town halls/focdW.Ac• C. Committoo revised rocommondaations And prosonted to council d. Council public hoa►ring and augropmont, on olec.tion contont "list" u. Neighborhood moutings on contont f, 11vetion This approach will roquiro us to ovarltap information on all three issues and during the holidays which could be confusing to our eitirons, 2. A modified information loop whoro we would eliminate %tops b and t (aabova) . In this way wta can sopraraxto the isnuos in the votrars mind, A last of committee and staff work woulc4 bo done behind the sconos which would ba orchestratod to "come cut" after the holidauys on Park* and immediately after the Parks election on tho City Center, 3 . Some other combination we jointly devolop, In addition to thea citizen reviaw/foodbaack issue there are a flaw other items wo nood to consider our approach on: 0 Campaign committee o Faa l l town halls o Others? x i dc:6384D a t ,i s i spa a urr w •°• JtA � ae �t� auA� 3 Y V i i W.i1 1. C ? .\r�.. Q CA a .+ . 0 i u ,.. twos L1$dng OC.Fl ;aoddng i S m 4 0: �„u, u .o;�in0ay Ol'i a «as aaoddns "Yi pnas aball 011911P4 43044ns �i t; •••i�� )VAG waoas ;vuo told 4aoddns N M M wi be � ) Obs40 a all 11'x71 46 — 3 40 w r a. r'�w .o a► « N✓ M ✓� WMO t/ � W �9 Q5 � N � 1� 9Ik ISN V a 6 it (7 • � ✓yy c }}!! y ✓ Y ��t YY� S✓fi Y i�b1YF ' • '� W w✓� L L ii• t�h�1►�N W�4 N OW�H b « K i b .. ✓ A d N L K N Y1 M m 01,441 S � �2 PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY BOARDS t STAFF 6 PRESS t F TIMELINES COUNCIL COMMITTEES CONSULTANTS NEWSLETTER CAMPAIGN L DATES (CAROLYN) (PR) (LIZ L ED) (608) OTHER COMMITTEE ( MARCH '88 X MAR—APR APRIL SUMMERLAKE LAND PURCHASES X MAY MAY JUNE PARKS CIP X JUN-JULY JULY v w LAND PORCH. G A AUGUST X AUG-SEPT SEPTEMBER BRIEF CC PARK PLAN CANDIDATES? UPDATE X OCT OCTOBER 6 GIP,,. PARK X NOV NOVEMBER PLAN ADOPT PARKS PLANS t CIP BRIEF CC'S ELECT O€CEMBER BALLOT MEASURES X DEC UNUARY CC RESOLUTION PARKS PLAN SUM L MAINT, X ANNUAL COMITTIC R€PORT FEBRUARY N/H TOMMY HALLS PARKS MERV, X FEB MARCH 9-b 5-11 o PARK IMPMTS 1-20 o FOCUS ARTIC 3-9t7 PARKS CAPITAL LEVY 5-YR 0 o LEVY COSTS X MAR $200,000 APRIL Oit. 00/1.000) A-a 4-10 4-17 X APR A-2A MAY 5-1 G-1 X MAY-?UN S-15 5-22 5-29 2UNC JULY AUW5T BEYOND O0'S0�/iCA -k CITY CENTER CITY BOARDS & STAFF i PRESS G TIMELINES COUNCIL COMMITTEES CONSULTANTS NEWSLETTER CAMPAIGN GATES (VALERIE) (CCPTF) (LIZ L ED) (BOB) OTHER COM rrT'EE C MARCH `BB a X MAR-APR � w a APRIL CCJCCPTF A' X MAY wORTS&OP a w v e MAY M ? pw A 7Z w a PRESS RELEASE JUNE CC/CCPTF 6/13 u : y MARKET STUDY WORKSHOP 6/21 y $.°. X JUN-JULY JULY FINANCE STUDY? AUGUST CONSULTANT? w q a y FANNJ X AUG-SEPT SEPTEMBER DRAFT CREEK PARK 9-S DOWNTOWN PLAN 9-12 N/H AREA PLAN /H 9-19 TOWN 'TOWN 9 26 HALLS— HALLS... X OCT ECON, DVMT. OCTOBER & LOW TAX 30-3 RATES 10-10 10=17 10-24 10-11 TOWN HALLS X NOV Z DOWNTOWN NOVCMRER REDEVELOPMENT 11-7 DOWNTOWN ' 11-16 REDEVELOPMENT 33-21 PLAN- 11-20 OKCEMDl'N lamb TURA X DEC 12-12 HISTORY 11-39 i CCPTF 12-26 PLAN tiR JANUARY 1-2 CClCX:PTF wDNKSHOP... f-f6 1-aa 1-ao X ANNUAL REPORT Pf;®RUARY CAMPAIDN 2-6 INT'0. 2-11 a-40 2.27 X FEB MARCH City Center S-6 City CNK 2-13 Plan 1-20 City Center X MAR CONFERENCE 3-27 CC RESOLUTION 6 Redvwt tionsnae APRIL 4-2 #-10 4-27 Fetus on 4-24 MAIL OALLOT CLCCTION - City Center OUL DATE S-11w09 MAY tri S-9 S-is CLECTION RESULTS 5-22 S-20 JUN£ 6-2 DISTRICT FORMATION C 6-12 _ 6-19 6-26 BOND BALE d CONSTRUCTION 00SOA/1CA .a IMLETTER CMMITY TRANSPORTA110N CITY CENTER PAM PAM L" M SERVICES CITY-WIDE OUILIWE EVEtTS i STREETS Me MENVELOPMENT CIP i tM t ANNEXATION ISSUES (NAIL BT) i1 jLVE a Trans. loan Mall O Vol. Rose Oda. (6/1) 0 Trans, Town Nall O 90th Tract Closure o Firawrks o Terri Tiger o So. MetN.yer Cap o Tualatin River O Co, Local Street$ ester Quality o to Circulation 11 JULY o T/4 Fireworks o Traffic Sttdies; a Market Study o Parts cap... o Focus to, Bull 0 4th Fireworks (x) (6/20) o r4re•# lAvite Dlavmwi Triangle, o CrulsiR' "Ilgard' MtMWlout Study o Recycling to 4th Downtown, Ow.. aad costs ... o 11147-0114 1944419 0 TR Iowa Nall&t 0 City Ca, Stam Savary A Plans TR List to CC ... Drainage", 0 MUIR` Tigard 0 135th LID o Terra IN. CIP a1 NxM otNNtN"A*wVtl 0 Public Waring o P«rks ►tans: 0 132adminut it welceew•to lie"; Ox) SC►i o street Bond has, A 4C Res/List Sw"flAka. Cook, MwMA4tiOn CACI;d.SarviceI (4/0) o Mkyar IT t0 4th o LIMit I&A f and Fenno Creak.. o Bull MR, Rd. o tw o%Adopted Cow, a OWN, 0 Pothole patrol o BM/M Trans. Plan CA C4eNRORt&1 #Meighborhoo0 town o Darthnauth LID o Land furchases 0 Ur"N Sarwace# o Verri the liver halls at swwf lake Am of Interest Fie. Cap M/HI 11 2 OCT o ftat►all Its 0 FOCV&ant ft"" 0 Draft DQM%00 0 f4M*creak Park 0 MOV4 Plant ISO (Bit�ii) o NPD lrvielAO 0 CIP$wtu# Repfft AJwK, Ilam Plan A D/1 0 Parke I"Balls V9=* U. 0 NDV 0 11/0 VK00n 0 Road Boni cast 0 Rom%. flRanc# 0 Park& Plan A Ci► o Amwx4tion Fact 0 camil slattian (3R)tOM) 0 Ma 0 Rd BORN 0#0i0n study ""t/Q A A ._ a f inaA4e lkirk#wo Intent #4 Vic 0 Street$INMIC 0 too. DOMO)nwnt o Iwes twRts 0 I#land MwaAat(On 0 Rarycllnl A Bros 412Pb) 0"War,*farewell focilltia Plsn A tax Rata 0 Bull MtR./Ms1Rut Tragi& a KIWI tree A CIP update ,,. ►atitlo"I Lightlal 0 10141*1 ANNUAL •stats of City 0 lran#portstien 0 City Center Plan a Park#Plan A CiP 0 Carestnity S City 0 Mele m a Y114rd1 KPORi Program Pian, lack fore# ONO ORB. A iervicfl W111 0 park$Not. M►A CIP 0 Dawat#wR Pian 0 71AA History #9 Fit 0 Park$ town Nall# 0 sprint C1► #City Canter►tan 9 Park Reservations •AHneAeti#n A City (1) (2/4) C44strwrtIo"A Limits o fames Cr. Conf. lerri liver 0 ESro Reeewl #4 MARCH o tlactlon (Park$) a 810 AwArd# a City Center A a Park CI►'#A 0 Bull Mtn/Wlnut 0 NCCLS tavyt 11/11) o City Cooter Res. O MH. Finance T•+ri 11w 94Ct1On&t 0 Sects a#darks a Park$ Levy COtts 01 APRIL 0 IS ISO 14ayt a Terri Tivar Re. 0 FOCUS on City a 11dg, ►in/t o Bwdpet Me$$ave tR) (4/11) 0 Valwntaer Dinner Comtrectl#n Center►las top. Contract ELatul 01 MAY- O Election (City a Terri 71W R#. feeyellop A Annual JUNE Center) Park#CIP'x ,laaR.ap (S/#) 0 VZC 99 JUL o 1/4 FinUakS O Capital Melnt. o City Center 0 Budget Adapted (9/26) Election Rewlts O wleae!to 119eM; o Crtitin• Tigard O Maeevelop"I t PN ORC. t Services Formd OO50a/1CA MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON r` r T0; Honorable Mayor and City Council August 9, 1988 FROM; Jill Manley, Interim City Administrator�r SUBJECT; Interim Situation Attached are copies of my njemus to y41u un the Interim Work program and your discussion summary on that subject. At that time we said we should take a quick reviow in early August in order to make any adjustments and to touch base on progress and satisfaction, Ple Ave rofiloct over tho last 6 weeks and bring your ideaa% to that as a result, of our discussion, ove►r the next• couple of months we can achieve the noodud results as well as operate as smoothly as possiblo for all of us. I'll have additional information avoilablo in Council Mail 'Thursday, dc;6384D a` i' . '"• MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council June 29, 1988 FROM: Jill Manley. Acting City Administrator SUBJECT: Acting City Administrator Work Program Basad on our workshop June 2E. 1986, following is list; of City Council identified work prioritivaa and my recommendation ctn how those be handled during this interim. STAFF CONSULTANT JILL DUE DATE DONE (h rra/wk o ACTING CITY ADMISTRATOR — C.C. Communications Marcoha 10 Staff Mgmt: & Coord as coord 6 Admin,/Projects 6 -� Int:ervoW 1 Rol, 1 -� Com,/Citizon Rol, 6 u COMMUNITY ;SERVICES MGMT. Wayne ao 6 coordinator o COMMUNITY INVOLVMENT Donnas A Dd/Com Support ID- 6d/Com/NPO inquiriou & ►aosist. Dd/Com training f o ANNEXATION CCORDTNATION L.nroon & 2 GtOf coord & info shArinij Jahn A. — citizen mt90 or critical st;r,at agias olcanvonto o Ci,.A!iSIFICATION REVIVW Jtanictt LGPI? or Rev,(,S) 9/00 con%ultant. 0 5—YEAR PLAN UPDATE Wayne & Rev,(,S) 11/69 Dept: lids .i LID FORECLOSURES/SPECIAL Wayne Rev,(.5) ASSESSMENT FUND MGMT. r STAFF CONSULTANT JILL DUE DATE DONE (hrs/wk o FRANCHISE FEE NEGOTIATIONS Wayne S Rev.(.5) Tim o COMPUTER MASTER PLAN Bruce & Rev.(.5) 9188 AND SYSTEMS EDUCATION CoRmlittee 11/88 x. o BULL MTN/WALNUT INFO. - Fact Sheet handout/ Loreen Rev,(,5) -- Newsletter insert o CITY HALL EXPANSION -- Remodel 0/88 - Arch.Plans to CC Walt 6 Russ Hanson 2 9/00 -- Spa3cs.Ready/raid Call Staff 11/08 o MGMT PERF/MERIT REVIEW - Data Gathering & Unicu Consultant? Ruv• (.`;) 11/80 Syvtem Survuy - Council Action 6/09 1989-90 DUDCLT - Supplemental 08/09 Wayno Rev.(,b) 1./09 Guidelines 09/90 Wayno Rav, ( ,5) 1/09 Ca WATER SUPPLY/OPTIONS RCVILW .- Tigard/Lake 0#w/TWD M`IG ConaultAnt? Orijonizo 0/00 Policy Options Rav, Consult:anO Roviow( .5) 9/00 o WRlrl'EN WORM, PLANS/ Staff 2 0/08 ACTION PLAN o NEWSLETTER/MEDIA MiArchaa Rev. (1) CALENDAR - Aura/Sept 8/22/00 October 9/12/08 - November 10/17/08 -- December 12/5/88 do:5644D CI"(Y OF TIGARD, OREGON _ MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayer and City Council July 1, 1988 FROM: Jill Monley, Acting City Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION REGARDING ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR I thought it might be helpful to summarize our discussion of Juno 29, 1988 regarding the Acting City Administrator work plan over the next four months. In reviewing the work tasks outlined, the following changes and clarifications were made, o Point was made that the "biggies" of transportation, parrs, city center. 135th and Dartmouth don't appear in name on the work plan. This is because they are included as part of the Acting City Administrator staff management and coordination element. o Computer Master Plan -- Concern was expressed about finalizing the computer master plan without the input of tho new City Administrator, It was decided to proceed as planned to complete the draft master plan, however, to not submit it to the City Council for final adoption until the now City Administrator is on board and has a (' chance to roact, o laassif ication Roview and the Manaagament: PerformancalMorit Review -•— City Council would like to see the scope of work and consider the bids in advance of the award of the contract, It is not necessary that those two pieces of work be tied together and performed by the same consultant, however, there may be some logic in than approach. Staff will make recommendations as we begin to got into the work content, * a" r Sueply/OF440%n_e Raw -- As at result of diocuss,ions, it wa►s docidad that in order to he able to respond to citizens there is ix mood for City Council to look into the natter now. I'll draft a letter for Tom's signature to Bob Bledsoe, Chairman- of the Tigard Water District, requesting a joint meeting of the Hoard and City Council. This meeting to hopefully take place between August 8th and the 15th when all City Council can attond. 0 Overall- Work Plan y-- Since Councilor Edwards had not had an oprortunity to voice his priorities regarding all department work playas for the 88/89 FY he will be contacting me directly, after he has had a chance to review the whole packet, to indicate any of his preferences (this was the 3 ✓process on department pages). In summary, regarding the Acting City Administrator work plan, it was. agreed that we would use it as a measuring stick over the next four months to make sure we're staying on course and meeting our deadlines. C Page two Honorable Mayor and City Council July 1, 1989 We discussed a few other items: o I'll be using the "Acting City Administrator" title on official City correspondence as needed while Bob is on vacation. After his final departure. I'll use the title of "Interim City Administrator" as this seems to be common practice and clarifies the role. o Regarding Acting City Administrator professional development, it was agreed that since two of the throe annual ICMA workshops fall over the next four months I would attend the first one in July (13, 14, 15) and tentatively plan on attending in October. A final approval on the October workshop would be made in September based on the work plan and progress at that point, o Regarding the Action Plan flip-flop of the parka and city center issues. it was agreed that it was generally advantageous to reverse those aloctiona and that we should work with tho respective committees to implement the change, o Regarding the 'Piorwvood Library levy foiluro, which wo know will impact our iibr,*ry usage, I'll look into what bacomas of those WCCLS monies, I'd like to mast with City Council again in early August as we move from "/acting" to "Interim" in order to touch base with you on progress and satisfaction. In addition, of that time wo can review the work plan and modify it if needed, JM:mhba4la t MEMORANDUM / l CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ! 1 TO: Mayor Brian and Members of the City Council August 12, 1988 FROM: Ed Murphy, Community Development Director SUBJECT. Director's Decision, SDR 88-15, Van DoatelenlL.00ijenja The City Council exprexsed concern over staff's administration of tho Ciiy'$ policy regarding on—site storm draina►go3 do►tention. Xn this case, the storm water run--off would (;lo onto the railroad property, ,3t4ff encouratjod the developer to contact the railroad to at least notify them of his intent to discharge rune-off onto ttioir propoarty, Howovor, if the railroad company said "no", the developer, would havo the option to provide on- site► detention. As vteoff undarstands tho situation currontly, the devoalopor is notifyino3 the railroad of his intent to dischr►rolor xtorm w4+torr onto thoir, property, I hope this responso satisfioa thoa Council's concoarn, If you h;ivoa :iny quostiond or, comments, wor can discuss them of the August i5 mooting or tall rr►oa. cw/604D {'1EMOFANUUM r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0; Mayer Arian and Members of the City Counci August 12., 1988 FROM: Ed Murphy, Director, Community Developme SUBJECT-. Key Pacific Director's Decision At the Council's meeting on August 8, concorn was expressed re3ardin(3 the Director's Decision to approve Key Pacific: Service Corp. 's site plan. Specifically, two issues were raised; 11 Why wore tho pcarkintq stalls iallowed to tae roducod from the standard 9' to 8' width. 21 Why was c.)n- sito rotuntion ollowad a►s a di�vv%loper'a option. 1, With rolJard to the parking stall width, the 8' waa allowed Das as WSATPm to allow thy, devulopor f1c►xibility tO work around tho existing tr ►as, and buc•auaea the do%j►alopur, n►ado a► good cavo that tho parking is ;all baxic4ly fur omployQoo, a►► they do not vxpoct "cu'at4.4110rs" to C0111v to this office building, ;In s►ddit;ion, sir cu they «arc► providing wall boyund tho minimum numbor• of spacos roquired, thorc+ should bo oxtr#a upaco OvailabIQ fur' pa►rkinq -- tho lot won't bo all ,janm►ud up with cars. 'The rc►aaon they w.ar►t all tho cKtrca parking, by tho wa►y, is bc?rauscj they have► mora than ono shift. Act:utally, thoir aito pl^n bhow;► 19H out of 010pr•oposc►d 3Gl. to bo tho full 9' width, Our codo would nor•m►11y roquirod 252 sp,ac", with up to M ollowod for compA t up*coti at ian 0--1/2' width. In 114AMM.ar•y, staff triad to *ccommod.4o tho devolopur's neat►d to conutruct an additional 109 parking stallo boyond tho coda minimum roquirenionl:s to acc:or►►owdeAto tho "shift charigo" problem, as wall Ors LhQir desire to nava as many tronas a% psnsiblct or) tt►o site, - Wee did thi.t by giving than) a littlea mora fltaxibility on tho width of the pe►rkinq stalls, but still setting 0, an the rninin►um, which wc4 felt wA% adQqumto for this typo of office use. 2. With regard to the on-trite retention issue. Staff's interpretation of the City's policy regarding on-site retention was that it was not required, and was actually discouraged but that at times it may be necessary as an option if there is a downstream constraint that would cause flooding problems on other property or on the street. Most developers are not interested in providing on-sites detention anyway, so it is usually not an issue. C;, Memo to Mayor and Council Key Pacific - Director's Decision August 12, 1988 Page 2 in this case, staff felt that the development should have either on-site retention, or another 30" storm line should be constructed under 72nd Avenue to prevent flooding in that area. Staff gave the developer the: choice — discoura in the on—site detention., but not actually prohibiting it. Because of the cost of constructing on—sits detention facilities, as well au some design constraints, tho deavolopors have opted to up�3r.Ado thea crossing of Red Ruck Creek under 72nd anyway, adding a new 30" crossint3 to the 30" one alroady in placo. Staff has discuasod itis curront- administration of tho policy on storm -detention, and in the future, will oporito can thea basis tt►:at on-ssito dotontion is niat. an option except in unubual circumstoncos. I appreaciata the Council' s commont's, ,and hopo this mumu sati»fie,d tho concorns raised at the last mooting. 1f you have any furthor quo;;ti,ons or cotimvknts, plua►so call 1110, t br/GA32D 0 1. MEMORANDUM \ CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON TO; Honorable Mayor and City Council August S. 1988 FROM: Bob Jean. City AdministratorMAJ-11 SUBJECT; Bull Mountain/Walnut Urban Services Study Attached is the final draft of the Bull Mountain/Walnut Urban Services Study. Since your review of the draft in the Spring, the following items have boon modified: 1, L:otters of response to the draft from other jurisdictions have been added to the appendix. Updates throughout the text of the study have been added in response to noted issues and concerns of the jurisdictions; 2. Information has boon updated for Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District, Unified Soworage Agency, and enhanced sorvice district costs, After Council receive and file action on August 8th, staff will forward the final study to interested jurisdictions, NPO #3, and CPO M4, lw/621.20 z F CITYOFTIGrARD OREGON t CITY OF T GARD,, OREGON BULL. MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA URBAN SLRVI:CES STUDY �ry x June 14, 1988 Prepared Uy City Administrator's Office: Robert W. Jean, City Administrator Ron 'Nagy and Chris Lin, Public Administration Graduate Studios Intern», Lewis and Clark College F j) 1 13125 SW Holl Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,ligord,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 .� CTTTY OF TIGARD. OREGON BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA URBAN SERVICES STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS P_a I, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY o Findings, ., ., , , , ,, ., 1 u Planning and Annexation Issues, , , ,,,,,,,, , ,, , , , ,,, ,, , , , 3 oConclusions, , , , , , ,,, ,, , ,, „ , , ,,, , , ,, ,, ,,, , ,,, ,, ,,, ,,, , ,, 3 o Recommendations, , . , . „ . . . 4 o Annexation Comparative�Cost/Household�Summary. ... ... . . .. 5 o Study Data Summary_ . , .. . .. . . . . 7 * Comparative Capital Projects Resources, , , , , , , , , ,, , , ,, , , , 8 TT, STUDY AREA o Summary. .. .. . . . , . . . . . . , 9 o Land Use and Development Patterns, , , , , , ,, , ,, , , , ,, , , , , , ,, 11 o Natural Features. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,, , , .. . . . . . . . . . . 1 15 o Transportation Network, , , . . 16 TIT. URBAN SLRVICCS u Washington County "County 2000” Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 o Police. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 o Road Maintanonce. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 21 o Sewar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 21 o Water. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , 22 w o Fire Protection. ,, , . . . . . 22 o Plannlr►g and Development Services, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 25 o School Districts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 26 o Park* and Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 25 a Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 a Other Servico§9. . . , . . . . , . . . 26 TV, RCVE:NUC4S AND CXPENDITURCS * Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 o Ravanue --- Cxpandit;ura Broak•-Even Curve. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 * Raverrua Expenditure Brook—Even by Arca. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 o Projectod Not Oparatirxl Budget Ruvenuc. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 31 * Copital Ravcnuas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 V. APPCNDXX, STATISTICAL TABLC6 AND MISCE;LLANEOUS. . . . . . . . . . . . 35 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA URBAN SERVICES STUDY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 1987, following the decision by the South Metzger/Washington Square area to annex to Tigard, the City was contacted by developers in the Bull Mountain area about annexation, The City Council discouraged an annexation proposal at that time, citing the City's lack of specific knowledge of the area's needs and the City's capacity to serve, Council directed the City Administrator's office to conduct an Urban Services Study of the Bull Mountain/Walnut areas, FINDINGS The basic data gathering was done by two Public Administration graduate students from Lewis & Clark College during the summer of 1987, The final report was completed by the City Administrator's office and released in Draft for 'review and comment in February, 1988. The Final Report was reloAsed in June, 1988, The basic findings of the study are: 1, DEVELOPMENT OF THE B116L MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA 1S OCCURRING AT A COMPARATIVELY RAPID RATE, o There are currently 055 households with 2,137 rasid€nts in the Study area; o The planned density allows 9,486 households for about 23,700 residents, more than 10 times the current population; + o Development is proceeding at a comparatively rapid pace with 607 housing units platted and another 385 units in process, or a doubling of the current population within 5 years; o The area contains approximately 2,045 acres zoned mostly at County R-6 (6 units per acre); the area is largely undeveloped; o Traffic donsity on Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street will in€reavo at 20 percent por year each year for tho next fivo years and then faster each year after that until reaching planned doneitias around the year 2010; o Sewer and water service► either exists or is reasonably available with deavelopmeant; o Fire protection is provided by the Tualatin Rural, Fire Protection District and can serve projectod development; o Parks funding is nonexistent, recreation services are available to a very limited eaxt•cant through the facilities of tho Tigard School District or by aannaxation to the Tualatin }sills Parks and Recreation District; o Storm Drainage service* are minimal and downstream impacts of upstream development arca potentially significant. 2. 7HE COUNTY'S ABILITY TO SERVE THE AREA IS RELATIVELY LIMITED, o County planning services .are directed towards major transportation issues rather than community planning. The result is that local planning services are limited largely to case-by--case plan review at the time of application, with little staff time available for long-range community planning; 1 .• o Police services are provided by the Sheriff's Office through the County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District by a special district levy of 84 per thousand providing one officer per 1,000 citizens; o County services available at County Courthouse, Hillsboro, 25 minutes � . distance; o Local road maintenance by the county is not presently available, but may be funded by a county local road maintenance district special levy of $51 per year, per household; o Major strut improvements are through the County Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF fees) funded as a condition of development, but Bull Mountain Read and Walnut Street may not be eligible for much significant allocation of TIF fees; a Storm drainage is not provided in most or the Bull Mountain area because it is still essentially rural, Recently approved subdivisions have been required to install storm drainage facilities, as a condition of approval, that are adequate to address their immediate impacts and to accommodate future growth. The County does not currently provide for area-wide storm drainage and potentially significant downstream impacts. although a County Storm Drainage District and a $2 per month per household fee i* under study; o Parks and Recreation services are available through annexation to the Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District ($1.47/1,000 tax rata in Fiscal Year 1807--88); o Street lighting is available through County Lighting Districts averaging $4-$5 per month, per household, !, THE CITY CAN PROVIDE HIGHCR LEVELS OF NEEDED SERVICES TO THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION AT A COST COMPARABLE TO OR EVEN LESS THAN COUNTY CHARGES, o Resident* outside city limits pay but "abandon" about $55 par person, r per year by not being in a city. Joining a city entitle* thom to their k share of cigarette, liquor, franchise feces and other revenues at no additional cost, totalling more than $117,000 par year (55 X 2,137 rz $117,535) to the area, o Revenue# from the area would exceed current City direct costs of services, making excess not revenues available for neeodead capital investment% in the Bull Mountain/Walnut areas; o City services available eat the TiqaAN Civic Center, 5 minutes; o City Police *ervicvs are 1/3 greater at 1 Officer por 750 reavidont* compared to the Sheriff'* levy at 1 Deputy per l r;*O; a Annoxa►ti.on to Tigard include* long-range land use planning and public facility programming %cervices from the City; o Library services are a►vsured to City residents, but available to those outside the City only sea long .as the WCCLS levy continue%; o City Systems Development Chmrgas (GDC's) collected from development area t"etod by the City back into tho areas whore the development occurred. Improven►ants to Dull Mountain Road are estimated to cost $3-S million a nd Wolnut about $2-3 million. City SDC% from arra davealopmant could ra►iso most of that *mount (0,600 units X $600 current GDC fee = $5,160,000). The County hiss no Parks funding mechanism, Development of the *reae insides the City would generate $2,150,000 ($250 SDC x 8,600 units = $2,150,000) for Park land acquisitive, greanway preservation, bikeways and other park improvements, r 2 For similar services on a $100,000 assessed value home in 1988-89 the differences in the Bull Mountain or Walnut areas would be: Service County/District City (after annexation) Police $85 (@ 85¢/thousand) $200 included in City tax rate Street Maintenance $51 (@ $51/year) estimates at $2 per- 1.000 Street lights $48 (@ $4/month) ($2.03 actual in 1987-88) Storm Drains a 24 2/month 18 1.50/month . Sub-Total $208 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard Without Parks. . . Parks included in Parks 6 Recreation 14? T.H.P.R.D? -0-- City Rate Annual Cost $355 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard PLANNING AND ANNEXATION ISSUES Growth and development is occurring under current Comprehensive Plans, with or without the adequate public Facility Plans. The City of Tigard is currently developing its Public Facilities Plans for Streets, Sewers and Storm Drainage systems. The City has offered to work with the CPO to jointly develop or expand upon the needed facility plans for the CPO area, as the City dues in the NFO areas. The City roaaliias that the issuas of planning and annexation are separate, but ralatod topics. While annexation is an option for obtaining noodod plalnning and other urban services. the City prefers to leave that choice to individual property ownor9 and residents, Believing that Dull Mountain/Walnut areas will avontually chrauao to annex — whether in 1 yo.ars, 5 years, or 10 yoars an tho C. City is, therefore, genuinely just as concornod as are current residents that the area bo dovel©ped in a logical and livable manner, CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the land use and annexation issuos offocting tho area aro saparato, but rolaatod. Dovolypme_nt iv occurring under currant comprohcnsivo plans in the [lull Mountain/Walnut area with or without onn@xation to th@ City, City levels of urban s@rvicas eithar are riot avai1*bla through tho County, or arta availmble more conveniently and less oxponsiv@ly for compaaraablo sorvicas from the City of Tigard upon aannoxaation. County Transportation Improvomant Foes (TIF) are collected as dovQlopmont occurs, but arta used County-wide, rather than being dedicated to the aaroa from which colloctod. City Systems DavcalopmQnt Changes (PDC) con be taargotod by tho City to immediate raroaa impacts. Noodiad otraot improvamonts, Likes bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street, are unlikoly in the foros000ble future without aanrioxatlon to the City prior, to devolopment. Since annexation aallowo as one-time multiplier, amount to be added to the City's tax base (annexing arta* .assessed valued X City tax base rate = $ added to tax base), it is potentially to the City's short-term financial advantage to consider annexation of the area after it is fully developed. But tax base considerations are just part of the analysis. 3 Annexation of the area sooner, rather than later, offers the following ' advantages for the affected neighborhoods as well as the City: 7 o "Abandoned" revenues at $55 per capita bring in $117,535 the first year and over $1 million extra the first 6 years at no extra costs per household; o City service costs city-wide become even more efficient following annexation of the Bull Mountain/Walnut area, further reducing City tax rate casts for all properties an estimated 5-10 percent below authorized levels; o City services are higher and costs are lower than County Service Districts for comparable services a City long-range land use and public facility planning could help guide development to a more desirable outcome under current Comprehensive Plan provisions; o City Systems Development Charges cannot be collected and targeted until annexation, Meanwhile, County TIP fees are being collected from the area but allocated County--wide, not targeted to needed improvements like Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street, It appears that the total Bull Mountain/Walnut area may eventually choose to annex to Tigard, If annexation happens somewhat later, that works somewhat to Tigard's short—term financial advantage. Meanwhile, each year without annexation means the loss of TIP revenues out of the area, continued loss of abandoned revenues, and the continued lack of long—range Public Facilities Plans coordinated with the Comprohansive Land Use Plans, driving up both the community's and the City's long—range costa, RCOOMMENDATIONS Basoei on the findings and conclusions of tho Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Servico# Study, the following is recommended: 1. That, annexation proposals from the Walnut and Bull Mountain II/North +++ Central areas be supported by the City and required before allowing connection directly or indirectly through City sewer lines; 2. That, annexation proposals from the Bull Mountain I/Southeast and Bull Mountain II/South Contraal aarv4s bee supported and oncouragod by the City; 9, That, annexation roquo+sts from gull Mountain III/Nvrthwast area* be discouraaged until annexation of the Walnut and Bull Mountain t—II areas are substantially completed and adaquatoly served; 4, That, consistent with the first two recommendations, as much choice ,as to timing and logical annexation units be loft to individual property owners and reasident%, and therefore, that tomaraawi ly irregular boundaries and piecemeal aannoxaitions be allowod, viewing the entire Study Area as the aventu*l logical boundary.Creation of islands or thea inclusion of soma minority parcels should also be given consideration by Council when more logical sarvica dolivory would rosult. All lawful annexation methods should be left available to individuals and property owners, including an annexation election of all or major parts of the Study area. S. That, prior to annexation, the City attempt to offer and provide as much Public Facility Planning and long-Prange planning coordination service as possible consistent with County and CPO desires, The better the plan coordination, the lass urgent is the pressure on the City and they area for immediate annexation, 4 f Revised 6/14/88 BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREAS ANNEXATION OPTIONS SUMMARY WHAT ANNEXATION CHANGES? SERVICE CURRENT AFTER ANNEXATION POLICE o Washington County Sheriff. . . o City of Tigard Police, .. o i Officer per 1000 residents o 1 officer per 750 residents. . . with Special District at 85t 1/3 more Police Service than per thousand special levy,,. from Special District,., o Emergency responses around o Emergency Responses average 5 minutes with Special District— under 3 to 5 minutes. . , u Records/Reports located at o Records/Reports located at Hillsboro, , , Tigard Civic Center— o School Resource Officer Programs,,, STREET o Washington County Street o City of Tigard pay for existing LIGHTS Lighting Districts. . . Street Light Districts. , , o $4 per month/$48 prr yaasr ,averago o Paid by City from Street funds. , . STREETS o Washington County— a City of Tigiard— o No local street maintenance now a City maintains lucal atrastsx or form local %treat district from gas taxes, ,,no fees. , . at $51 par year extra. . . o Development SDC fees dedicated o Devolor►mont TIP fears go towards in%ida the City area. , County-wida project priorities. , . SEWER BILL o U.S.A, rates. . . o U.S.A. rates— o Unified Sewerage Agency bills o City of Tigard bills monthly annually on property t:axes. . . per our U.S.A. contract. . . STORM o Currently no County vervice, o City of Tigard Storm Drainage DRAINAGC under study at $2/manth— utility now at $1,50/month. . . PLANNING, o Washington County Dept, of o City of Tigard, Community BUILDING & Land Use & Transportation at Dovelopa►Rnt Dopartrtment at Tigard CNGINEERING Hillaboro offices. . . City Cantor, , . o County CPO Plan, , . o City adopts CPO Plan— o lan—o Limited long-range planning. , . o Full. City Planning and Engineering taarvicas. . . LIBRARY o WCCLS Library Systam only if o Tigard Library open to City Tax Levy continuota. . , residents even without WCCLS tax— GENERAL o Washington County Commission o Tigard Mayor and City Council, with one local Conw&%stoner. . . all locally +elected. . . o Millsboro Courthouse. . . o Tigard Civic Cantor. .. =r' Revised 5/14/88 WHAT ANNEXATION DOESN'T CHANGE SERVICE CURRENT AFTER ANNEXATION FIRE o Tualatin Rural Fire Prot. Dist. o No Change, stays the same WATER o Tigard Water District o No Change, stays the same SCHOOLS o Tigard School District o No Change, stays the same PHONES o GTE or PNO o No Change, stays the same POST OFFICE o Same addresses and zip codes o No Change, stays the same PLANNING AND ANNEXATION ISSUES Growth and development is occurring under currant Comprehensive Plans, with or without the adequate Public Facility Plans. The City of Tigard is currently developing its Public Facilities Plans for Streets. Sewers and Storm drainage systems. The City has offered to work with the CPO to jointly develop the needed facility plans for the CPO area, as the City does in the NPO areas. The City realizes that the issues of planning and annexation are separate, but rolated topics, While annexation is an option for obtaining noodad planning and other urban services, the City prefer* to leave that choice to individual property owners and residents, Believing that Bull Mountain/Walnut area* will eventually choose to annex m- whether in 1 year, 5 years, or 10 years the City is, therefore, -genuinely just aas concerned as are current residents that the area be dava+loped in a logical and livaa.blta manner. n COUNTY SERVICE~ DISTRXTS OR ANNEXATION? Under the County 2000 Plan, countywide services are to be paid from county-wide funds; local services must either come from County Special Service Districts or axnnaxiation to the City. Annexing to than City provides more service At ea lower cost than buying those same services from County Service Districts, rar similar sorvicas on a $100,000 aassessud value homes in 1988-89 the dlfferancos in the Bull mountain or Walnut arouas would be s+ru_ic+* Chunt Ulstr ct 911 (tear annoxm :inns, Police $85 (p 85(/thousand) $200 included in City tax rats Street Maintenance $51 (0 $51/year) estimated at $2 per 1,000 £troat: Lights $48 (Q $4/month) ($2.03 actual in 1987-80) Storm Drrainago $24 (0 S2_/month)_ -.- 16 Sub-Total $208 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard Without Parks. . . Parks included in Parks__dG-_Recreaation-$'147 T.H.P.R.07) --+D- City Rate Annual Cost $355 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard 6 1. 01D n%M Wf fCIA Inca 010% T.f In T ew NNO bOW141f .r ch W PAD of 0C4 %a 41 mTm�+Opo O Y'�.r Yl mTN Ok C-4 r. m f at O It M f m 0 C r?N N A M) 10 T P ��1 f c An T O P M W 1 m 10 10.1 N M P M M M 1', f 1 N 1 q %D i O Q O M fM N W at �D N4n Mf 10 TInN N .+Am.r f Of W1 O w+r+0 N f M +14 f O f c z f O W 1 f N f An.r' 10 1D M M T .y.r 4n T Y1 T O �q N M f JI w+ N -A M71 N in f m q1 0 An m W1 f%V W1 f f 0 �O P T f N N T O W N O N T W41'+Mh Tf TW W1N W1N W fTT W.�f WC1h OAR�MfP P WI P M P M Vi w A M M Vi T M 1IT WS P N Mir N 61 41 W P +w 41 g W P W oft w4M MONM p w O P fr+04 m O Tf N T M N.+O m f 4n M T 1t1 M n C" b N T WI W1 N O N M T S N �O M M N M Ncm W1 P N M i y W MM 4m-W wr W1 a1 W1Mo M OMNAYf f TPTMNM W W1TLIWN ' N owW OM^ W1PlAt41 I QO{�Y1i N.w♦ J101W f ..�W ANb PMNTPT {f1 C4 C) Wl W1 PlNTW1�+ OMY1 W1N1p OWINTPW w 1A w pp s ♦ w At4AA i1 AMWDM b wiPf Wi w1 Tf N MA1iWln Q 'w'1' M b �.1 n NW ti M .Mwnwl ATM N M M V411 a K 40 qr ,fl 70CCII Z M W T y' Qi A iA ii+i►r►M MYOOAI JI O�ch0 4��/f Cf M p�TgNM M wOy�P M4IMNNwwTgO�M O�aq iV IN r VVVAAA 41 N►MNw� �fl MgIUMN bMMAMn ��444NIAYYI/1 n�P MA�f1 AA N 1 M A M M M O M 44 l l 4 f i w NAT T 1 Y! M N M N A M M A WJ1I f(VJ • 41 171 AM �M N M MM p Mn W1 SAM i r qt 49 to V1 wl 11i A.1 1N6 M hl TNi N#n KMOMN A" MrMA+e1M WMMNNI M MTfAwNAMy M4;010y 41! 1H .Id M1 N i1'1 i M • ai'O Ifl ++ W1 T A • d1 A O 1D wM N S1 n M M 1A P+ N�w O zoo, W1 h r n sR M w1 v 1 ,�}1 i► �i 404 M 10 M.y i N • M 44 M M Irl M N N Q44n ! .i► QQM iA 4e1 Y', 4-1A 10 01- AnNNO AAn O JIM A�AAOA NNI�q OfA �► M' y.�MMA " � NMM► ✓Wllw!�M n W1 1AA M/yp�ri !W, �P n n 01 IV 44 h�f a 466DDD o"rA M Q It w diprM n ft �'. 1R1«:♦ b A^� i >w.r N .p.1 ni 0" A A .a M N M d, PV N P^N 1► w w 1 W M N N ' q1 N N 'Jr. 11. 0 �1 y �y J AlJ b J 8rcame ' :is :i� a � wa ' .gi "' 0N' e P N a.r C Cy n' /0 sir a.r Cs K 9 w 9oo D > it IA w C1 Yyy w j pp y d Al hf w p�p . 0.Lia w pp p,Y A/I Hd S�ECW NdS�Ap[W2� NdIG.}Y WZ Nd26.aW 2 Mdb�WRp 4r^ • E Q p pQpQ pQ Cpl pQ pQ }!4L+ W CC pO O G� v N ice+ >N m m N N M 4- . a,J M 40, 4 Q A r ^ N ^� qrM O� to It QQ CQ�I Cl m 11 A ti SP1 M M 01 � 4.6 N ayM4j � wr A M inn a p N m Giy r F ,w �. N Ci « w y� M yr Z ,W Nei « 40 in Z '9 4 M M rr - .» ami► r►� 4� b �u � ►y sw C1�(� L� s> t� •�gr p• +�dll O G t»� 16 . Cf 6 V KN �NN/1. gLi f LIEN BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT STUDY II. STUDY AREA , ahe Bull Mountain/Walnut study area consists of approximately 2,045 acres of unincorporated Washington County located due west of the current limits of the city of Tigard. The area's northern boundary follows Old Scholls Ferry Road and the southern boundary follows Beef Bend Road to SW 150th Avenue, The Urban Growth Boundary marks the western limit of the study area. The study area contains 855 households with an approximate population of 2,150 persons, The current assessed value of property and residoncas totals $97,164,500, This figure reflects only those properties appearing on the tax rolls as of February 1967, and does not include any reassessments or newly subdivided properties. Because of the rapid residential devolopment now occurring in the Bull Mountain avoo it is not possible to dotormina the true assessed v,*lue of the study aar-aa from the standard sources. A rooppraisal is currently being conducted by the Washir►gton County Assessor and, applying a formula ruconmiondod by the Assessor's Office, the rcavonuo ostin►atas in this report: aro an attompt to show both the true present voluo of dovolopoblo land ar well 4% tho prosynt value of undermauvosscd property, The Asszarsor's Off'ico oxpocts to complete their appraisal by October 1907. 0 Land Use and development Patterns Zoning in the study area is about 85 percent R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre) with a small amount of R-15 in the extreme northwestern corner and at the location of the Foxglove subdivision on Beef Bend Road near 150th Avenue. Another exception includes an R-5 designation for the Hawk Ridge development on 150th Avenue. There is no commercial or industrial land in the study area. To better describe the development patterns in the study area, we have divided it into four subareas (see map 2). Development is most prominent in the Bull Mountain II subarea, which contains the Mountaingato subdivision, Phases I—IV. Foxglove Phases I and 11, Sonoma villa, Bull Mountain Park W3, and the Orctas subdivisions, These subdivisions have been platted and approved, but do not currently appear on the tax rolls. After an indepth study of the development in this area we have estimated tho rata of growth and the assassad value rovonuas that could be gonoratud in this area. The other subareas,, Bull Mountain I, Pull Mountain III, and the Walnut area, are not oxparioncing the same rate, of growth as Bull Mountain 11, but all contain large amounts of developable acreage. This includes a.pproximataly 780 across of land currently under farm or forest land deferral. Land which is under deforral is typically valued at $350 to $1,000 par acre, which is contrasted with an average of $28,000 par lot for acreago which has boon tubdividod. i; MEMO 11 `" BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA DEVELOPMENT PROJECTIONS Urban Development Housing Units Population o Platted and Approved lots = 607 1.459 o Recent Applications or Projects in Process, Lots: 395 924 Additional DevelQpMen . by991 2 t?1 2 2Jlu o Current Area Households & Population B-Tra 2.�Z o Total Development by 1992 (?) 1 .874 .52a Assuming normal development timelines of Approved and In-Process units. current aroa population will more than double within five years, That means an average 20% increase per year each year for the foreseeable future, on traffic (Beef Bond, Buil Mountain, Walnut, etc,), sLorin drainage and other urban impacts, or 400-500 new residents per year. Thin development is occurring under current Comprehensive Plans, with or without annexation to the City. 25,000 BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT POPULATION 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 1987 1908 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 2000 2010 2020 12 n at ��It�r{►tltOtia ►{r$r{e rl,g�u tNElpl .;tts{l Ila r�r�Tn17�m i't '1'i� l'f� t T .. _ ,_...- _ - - � NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED _.� z � I ` � � ( � � I j! � t� t tf t•t+ io Ffi leo t f c a tta t a a{� {a r alr r{t r{o r t ajr t t atr ilr a=r yr ttt ( _ -...__-_l2' u . DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO 1 THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING, _ _ ___ _ _ - . OE 62 82 12 IiZ SZ 42 'S2 22 l2 02 Of 81 LI 81 SI4 !+! El 21 11 01 R 8_._`._:9�.S._.. I, £— .,z _ '� � rt ;naI�HMlMNrltuelMmle,uiturltN mAR .- E. 1 77-- W Y w `J ; - s� # 3 � -40 son rr- F Zo ,, ,, �a^�+.'.�i dal �,a��T{�•t��i'.d� :Y Sig y5 � �cif S. �� sa«ac•♦ . ,F,-a'�++a-s`s`'�i'r�!siAi?' '�,.,`..'•��'r�`' T ' t�.. ° •++fir +s.+►r•.s y+i.`>.► • '�.ir' �',•ns;+ws'is•s i� �'�{'� .., _ - �,t •y . _.. ''s0i•`'s.irr.►.••stary�it�►•'si-�sss ss+i..i►a.•y`i•�r'�i r` �y's+li'�s a a•s+sis{_s'►�r'ra•arys►' s+r'�s'�s; n+';:s+r'►i sus+s� _;;s r iry �.'-' #�it•�, +��sss'+'►ssa+sa'��+�s�;'�ts�`is��s•sr.•;s�a� s#s+�i•is��+.�s�� i` . wra«yss•�ss• iy+f«r+rs� �siasyi�`i+ri«s i••+►�i#��:�s+sem+� :s+►•i.sts•s+s+ss-'fs'"sw>s+a►+.•i�ir+isirssi•ia'..i'ss`s•ss��d's s�s•��-� _ a�� 'i. `'`.� FL � �,. - 3`- a+i•i+is��fi.•►=� is•s`i'�iisis+is s�i1"�-- �si!s�s!+.��'�'.is � "y Aja' , `' � �¢`.` � '°�p �,. .;as+•+ss'.•ar*s�si�,«�ri�a��•+s•�s,►„•+s,�Y►si ,+«• ,A•, �_'�^' r f �r`�r�• . f• •s« •s♦ s•s•ss •s ♦�«+rsss•ss•+sss•s{`+sss'+'i + � �b >.►.+••+•ars••••••••ars•• `- a{ � e �♦3•ji i � � i roc �f � � rsi+�� i' rsrr:�s•sr{'�`«4sf+i iJ+s"❖*s.••s•+e. '^�+,�! '` _.cam . .: •e R ` a.`«•a%.". �a•a►:+•�►s fi•i►•+.i ri+•ssss••+•+•i•«•s•i ,�i�• . guy, � f'� •_ �+div f+r-^.• �+r�►��i'�►+�!a►•+►�!••y«•iii•=••••i•••�.i..�r - »'999ffF ss'•,.•a._ • s�ss�s+. ♦.si i�+.s a►�•'i••i„s•+s-�.t:.�� t �a�iC _ s s+i isi i isi i �i i i i«�«ice«s••s� ♦s•s� ,yp��c-xC '' � ti� ,'� �i •a►+.:a:.s...`► .❖••.��'•Z•�❖1�3F .l'` -:' � .^ X � `,w„�5yr .i RE .. ► ►si•OOs•i"Oi•si•i��iisi•i••.►•«•iisi+ice, x� �' • �yf� ;3P?�: (\\C;t?c��iisiii-�•ii ii ii2«�«ya!• ►•iisiiiiisi-ii�►•ii�ii+i ]��y r - � �- ?�`."x� rti A 2 uu WMIUIuUvLLUMHUUUUUUILULWUUUUuUu 1117 _F •,� ,� , . . f fr �� :- rrs yf 3�rw z�' '�'J.,c � y_'}}' �� - J f j-•3..c 5 s r�r �r�,,f'Sd'Jr y�iru?'9'!��-. .zr �r� +,a,�'•.'4�'''� / +� f ,J/,T-_ :r� 3{,.�.r .fr.%:�r.4..c''"'_• 1x..rr� .;,;r. r Jq ,.r - mama . _ ...h✓lrf "'" r _ Y q 6 4 d9 "4 as`4 '+r w2 t 4 h :s JJ if/{s"V4 _ f }rr r Jf .rj i. rjr BERN rrr r�r., p, Its ` -si � ss �.rnr,+> r�f/!r -. - +i�►,f nor y5 «.j NMI: , fl. ►'�./rte .,.. .- 7� if S�i i! ,t rj' r.��•►�� ei � ;a:s.x � dip',<F is _ I J' �,•,••��j�1�fr•■ `alto ? f vp van ■``moi�y11��I ��•��: �a�.� 2 t1 t ♦ i fly:12R®+ Sam- 3 .ta_ ak WMIHHLM ANKI 77 f ttt 3a °� ""n'3 ��w�itia t'F 1e'• +� e� �; ' ., ��>• , + ! }� � s r}t•=_ �� ¢ `i ''-dam'-" f _;,L. l�f'q.�.3' Z r f ,ya' �.., _ .✓moi /3a�'i �'',.' j � ��ix� '�}+7=,Y+' z was � 'fil+� �aP♦ /` AML! ,� 6: .t i■�##;`��*� ` rald � zml Me lliL JEW one MINE a on MR own f F40, San d' r Asx 4�^s�`.. ,V,.e xt�* -;a. r: ;'^,•M'"`z:. �• r„�,.,.-a•1 - �r�/t E� a� �,,,1 -,i • , ,�. o'r's ''"f`'�{�',a�;�", > +�� ,ad+, 'r � � 4' .c. � , � �✓ .:ir +1a:t•iro.. �s'3vn: :; mm .�:Ivan ,• ` en ,. y,.v3/•., •MEN 1 lm i.a7�V r.. _..�C�t..w'?e?f ■ �_r s ' .,5� '�Fij p y r. r- i r r' �� r� rr ,r r..�,t+i€' ✓r �,, � � r r f ! Bill rK ' 7 f f t Lr�f F ►1 tt'��p `�.t Vii.,,. � � {—� �� .. � ....... " - _ �RX.f,rail � � �"' �,` �a.�tri a■ �� y NEI mom,r - 11/!ton I no MONS �R + Cil ai mi ;E ®— rK Kiwi Ile. , '�-' � �tti). 111 I I ♦ �,,, �* � 13 c,., .�:�:�=�:�:�♦♦.�..,. lu -1 . RTr, j1� .�.f..• � .;�.,,..i ,�' ..'rJJ+- JJ .+ .+!J• rJ �. y J z ;r;'Jj,..., r=,.a�I.�z+J.x,v< /+� z. JJ-�a .�,'.yc+"i?u,sft� ��Jr .. J ,,,✓,✓,u,.�.,,vJ,r' �w. 't� f. :�1$$?+.'t�.• yrf s�.f��'r�`;-�` h s �s�'''^+rrr^•'{'w;9"� '!•'�yf r �'�' .t'' ��. - . �y',n�' JaJC J'' rztt•' rJ1. J - $. v- ,�5+'?}rr; �»: �c -r li• asJ.�,� .�-.z' > �% l�ii J fJ r'{`.•J,w. ' J� u w � ��J�^rw �' { �Q��.��.,roz •�„urt„'o-.,^�gcttu��3- � �,�f.. ..f�f ar J?J•h. �{�' 'a'�''•'S r't J a'J'" � s "ia .i2� . -,� ..+ . �: t -Fwv.w�.-.Y rv�i" t � 3'Y+•hS� Y Y1¢ � .�z.:� . r 2 mpg fP IL mail our I in 8 man noun MR Ow tt 777 �f} 1 ��,■■�� i E�,�=■� � �! ■�� . � i. <<? �?.tom a� e a r ry . F� r .-�1�_alb �'�I�1��•1�i��, � < .�.,�' s' e .�<< +•..s � ate. -.,•..:;fir-msµ., -�-. '..� _,:..�.-.. „�-:.._ .�_ .;:., .._ .. �, ' .;».-s ._ _�. .._,-�_ ,..__.,___ _.-:�..:.. ,.:, ..- W.•, .- .__ :.._ _:.rte - r r'�`•kt P r + .t - z• r � Natural Features Bull Mountain is a steep—sloped landform with a flat, elongated crest area, Elevation at the peak, just north of Bull Mountain Road and 144th Avenue near High Tor Drive, is approximately 700 feet. The northern and southern low land areas are more gently sloped and largely forested with a number of narrow, steep ravines which act as natural drainage channels. Drainage on the southorn slope has been complicated by development, more specifically, installation of sewer lines which follow the natural channels, Given the sensitivity of the soil to disturbances of this nature, there is likely to be further erosion in this area without the implementation of a drainage mana►gemant program, The norther low land arca is susceptible to flooding in the rainy season, a problem which also needs to be addressed before responsible development can occur, At pranont there is no drainage managamont survic►a provided by Washington County. ' The Bull Mountain area has boon dusignaatod a critical groundwatar arca since 1974, when it was dotarminod that groundwater lavals were dropping at a rapid rate. The Stato Want@r Rovour+car Duportmunt has monitored the loval+s since 1974 and has r@cantly d@torminod that th@y are now roturnin►j to normal. It is expactod that the critical groundwAtor arcs dasiynation will ba raveindad in the near future, thoroby lifting any restrictions that may a►tcompony that designation. 15 " . Transportation Network 3 The existing transportation network may be described as adequate for the current population, but it will need to be upgraded to handle increased capacity as development occurs. the only Principal Arterial in the study area is Pacific Highway, which intersects with Bull Mountain Road and Beef= Bend Road, both classified as major collectors. Scholls Ferry Road, which forms r the northwestern boundary of the study area, is classified as a minor arterial. There is currently a plan to widen and add a turning lana to Scholls Ferry Road between the intersection of Old Scholls Ferry and Highway 217, This would relieve the congestion at the ill—designed intersection of Old and new Scholls Furry Roads, as wall as aiding tho traffic flow to 217, Bull Mountain Road and Roof Bond Road both carry the mast significant amounts of traffic from the pull Mountain +area, Thaw roads are in nood of widoning and curve realignment in order to handle additional traffic as a result of dovolopmont which will food thoue roads in tho dull Mountain 11 a►roa. Walnut Av@nu@ is also a major colloctor and also int@rsocts with Pacific Highway, Thu surface is in poor condition from the vicinity west of 121st and is vary poor at the intersection of 135th. Probably the worst rand of the entire study ar•raa is 132nd which is in dire need of grading. Therm are currently no bicycle or pedestrian networks within the study area but both the Washington County transportation plan and the Tiga ml park plan contain provisions for bike paths and pedestrian walkways. 16 '. All streets within the study area, with the exception of private roads, are under the jurisdiction of Washington County. The County's policy in regards to transfer of jurisdiction is not set. At this time, the County prefers to retain jurisdiction of arterials and collectors. but transfer jurisdiction of local streets. Scholls Ferry Road is state—owned and maintained. l.. 17 40 id-O 4 0 --ami 4 k mac' tt I wC. C-2 S fir .s rU4-'0'j =111151 Lvz, soy 300 AM- _T1 CO .10 S 00� • 20 0 = WI 1 0 ILI 2 IV 'Tl 16N7,007* 0ii. 1110 0001111,1111i**.ABO Y 41, q* A60 9 of04 Y 4+ 1100 k"WONOWAMOWO 1100-2 1400 1300 Ii. 1300 6 0 coo 10 10 wn FK4URE 2 AshingtonLEGEND Projected PM Peak Hour <-io—OF _'Volume by Direction Traffic Volumes aunty 12m) of Travel "UC MRKS «...4«..,..,'...,,.,.Proposed Facility TIGARD-BULL MTN Area III. URBAN SERVICES Services in the unincorporated areas of Washington County are provided by a number of special service districts, some of which also serve area municipalities. Washi ton Count "Count 2000" Plan In order to cope with consistently under-funded urban services programs, Washington County has proposed a plan to provide road maintenance and police services to urban unincorporated areas until these areas annex to municipalities p-- a process the County views as inevitable. Thu County 2000 plan provides for "interim uorvicall until 1992-93, at which tima the County expects annexation procudurc►s to be in place for most unincorpor4tod areas and will roviow to dotormino if thou* programs should continue basad on annoxation activity and cost-effectiveness. The County 2000 plan is an attempt by Washington County to fit limited rrasourcos to %@rvicu civir►andu in view of population growth and the subsoqucnt domands can urban sorvicos which result. I'hu Council 2000 concept was developed by the County to Fund only county-wide services with county-wide tax rovenuas. specially bonoritead areas or groups will pay their own way, This can be deme eait:har through annexation or through ostablishmant of County sorvico districts. Basically, the plan covers two areas which nood immadiate attention. 19 " Police Services The unincorporated areas of Washington County have an approximate population of 115,000 persons. Currently there are 56 sworn patrol officers to serve the areas. Because of increases in crime and a larger inmate population in the County jail facility, the Sheriff's Department expects the number of patrol officers to be reduced in order to serve the necessary duties at the detention facility, Currently the response time for priority 1 and 2 culls to the Sheriff's Office are in the neighborhood of 15 minutes or more, For priority 3 and A calls the response time is up to an hour, For some calls there is no on site response at all, The proposod .Police Service District would increase the patrol officers by 64. tven this incroase would not enable the County to provide police prot,action at the skame level las municipalities which are adjacent to unincorporated areas, At tho Boundary Commission public hearing on June 11, 1987., Washington County Sheriff, Bill Probstfield, acknowladgod that the increase in patrol officer-# was necessary just to maintain police protection at a basic lovel. Doc ause tho Policy Service District would be sunseto_d in five years tho question was rais@d about job s@curity and sons@ of commitm@nt the "temporary" paatrol officers would have, hrobstfiuld's response was that they would undoubtedly be pickod-•up by municipalities who will annex the unincorporated areas by yoar 2000. This is the goal of County 2000: to provide wheat basic level of urban service rrasourcas will allow with the goal of encouraging annaxwtion to logical servic►a providers -m municipalities. The enhanced sheriff patrol district will be funded by a voter--approved levy of $0.85 per 1,000 assessed value for property owners. This translates into s $85.00 per year for a single family dwelling valued at $900,000. 4 20 f r ' Road Maintenance c ~" Washington County has approximately 1,200 miles of roads under its jurisdiction. About 700 miles, or 58 percent, of these roads are local roads. Given the limited resources the county has for road maintenance, these local roads are the last priority for maintenance and improvement. The County 2000 response to the problem is to create a County 'Service District for local urban road maintenance which will, in effect, be a user fee, The County is developing a method for assessing and collecting these fees but a preliminary study shows that the average cost per household would total $51 per year, Sower Sewor service is provided to the study, as all of WAshington County, by the tanifiud Sewerage Agency, The only sarvice within the study area is in the Bull Mountain 21 subarea. This area drains sc+uth to the Tualatin basin through thu King City area. Officials at USA prodict that sower mains loading from the study area are adequate for projected dovalopment in this subarea and it only ro"ins for local improvumenty districts to form in (ardor to provido service to the south fakes of tho mountain. Oavcalopmant on the wast;arn portion of the mountain will require a pump station. Devolopment on the north slope of the mruntHin is restricted by the lack sof sower linov in this vicinity. Lines will have to be installed from the W►air trunk to serve the area of Scholls Ferry Road, while the area north of 135th will be served by lines in the vicinity of Summer Lake. 21 The Walnut area is virtually unsewered at this time with the exception of a small neighborhood which adjoins the City of Tigard, north of Walnut Avenue. f" By agreement between the City and U.S.A., any development connecting to sewer through City—owned lines must annex to the City to be entitled to use City line rapacity. Water 1 Water service is provided by the Tigard Water District. Currently, the Water 3 District YePVQY all developed areas and the matter plan provides for service ¢ reaching the entire study area as development occurs. Fira Protection The study areae is served by the Tualatin Rural Fire Prot ►ction District (TRFPD) and in the northeastcarn corner by Washington County Fire District #1 . TRFPD has stations in downtown Tigard and mouth of King City, Washington County #1 has na station just northwest of the study area at Rousaaar and Weir Roads. The rosponso Limo is generally within five minutvs throughout thy► i study urea, but imprvvemant of tho transportation network would shorten rosponse. For. thosa #seas with fire hydrants, virtually all dovalopod Aron%, tha► firo insurance rating is Class 3. ror or-cat without: Pira hydrants the rating is Crass 8 or 9. 22 Planning and Development Services Planning and development services are currently provided by the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation in conjunction with the Neighborhood Citizen Participation Organization for Bull Mountain. Their collaboration has produced a community plan for Bull Mountain which is very general in nature but prescribes 'some specific guidelines for development in this area. School Districts Tigard School District 232 serves most of the study area. BoUverton School District #46 serves the northwestern portion of the Bull Mountain ITT subarea. District 232 levies $12,10 per $1,000 assessed Value while Beaverton 040 lorviou $14.10 par $1,000, k Parks ^!A Rgcrpatjion There aro currently nig parks or rocrea►ti+ona►1 f4cilitiws in the study area, The Bull Mountain Comunity Plan racvmrt►onds tho Community "strongly consider annexing to thv, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District or an appropriate recraation service provider", (£o* Oenor•al D®sign Clomont NIS of the Plein.) Those residents who live in the portion of Bull Mountain tI= within Tax Oistriet 4V have access to facilities in the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (`fHPRD), while all have access to Tiga►rd's Summer Lake Park and other facilities within the Tigard park system, The Tigard Park plan provides for park facilities consisting of ten acres per 1,0100 residents. The 25 y ,Park Plan has identified some area which would be suitable for parks in the study area. The fiscal year tax rate for THPRD is $1,47/thousand of assessed value, i Libraries a t f The study area, as all of Washington County, has access to the Washington County Cooperative Library System, The Tigard Library is part of this system. r z 1 Other Services Thera aro virtually no street lights in the study area, Now developments may join a County StraQt Lighting District at $4 or mora par month per household, a Storm drainage managomont is also non- existent, A County-.wide Sturm Drainage District is currently under review at $2 or mora par month par household, � f t l m 26 IV. REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES E In order to analyze the revenue and expenditure potentials for the study area Z i if annexed, a detailed study was conducted using information provided by f } Washington County Department of land Use and Transportation, the Washington County Assessor's Office, the regional Metropolitan Service District, and the Portland State Center for Population Research. Using this information we were able to determine the assessed value of the property in the study area, the a population. the number of households, total acreage, vacant and buildable E acreage, and acreage currently under farm and forest deferral, From this information, projections wera made in rovonue from assessed property value and extrapolated to include revenues from non--property tax sources. Those projections ware also basad on development patterns within t:ho study aroa. After conferring with County subdivision poreonnol and local developer-&, ' we have estimatod the rate of development. This procodura w4s necessary in view of the rapid development in the Bull Mountain 11 subarea in ordor to calculate the assessad value since this information is not yet awvailoble from the standard uourcos, Population projections war* calculatod from the numbor of housoholds which will result from current; devalopment. Our projections for population at: density, which for our purposes is labolud "Year 2000," ma►y differ from tho projections by Metro by 2005. Our information is based on a+ model that 27 ' differs from that of Metro and was created for a more specific study with more s local information. Metro will be updating its information in the spring. of 1988 and will be soliciting projections From local areas in order to adjust its regional model for population pnijections, NOTE; In projecting revenue/expenditure estimates, 1987 dollar values were held constant. No attempt was made to estimate Air adjust for inflation. { f lw1A426a f 28 m . „ m I co N O w oaf+0 co Ln K O .. © a 41 l •Nr W-4 a > o t+v a+ d a+ A e, M ca C cn M m a 0 o a R1 r+l 1 w 44 is fig R K P `''i .x A 102, tv ar 0 a to so to w 50 :0d v'► u'1 +n QI fa a4 - ox a.©y mad 29 t, •}: ::ti-::::::::::•::•::;::•: .... Cl i; .-+ •,�i`y`.ii �•:moi•. ��'•,''«��.'• i;: \iti ••�,';�ii'"��.``�. iti`'••`titin'•• �+ uTu4unON Ung � ply" :: •�,�:•:�: ti';:�:• wwwwrrw�Nl �wwwwM IT uTeaunoW TTnS � �•i�� wrwar�+wr�aawow�aNw�raa�nwwww uTvaunow Tina � ,:i•'Stitiiti�ti4�ii � c �4 d TaTuapToas pauSTL ��ii��ifi1� 1F . !4��11•�M �1FI�AIPF�Y1(Mi A � ' 2nuT98 opo� tea► 0 0 �e 44` S sM, m nj • v s.. 30 a. as N O� t r Q H � t r r r r { M f�M H 1.+ Grol • • • Rp }r C C C d C rl � � r1 rf E1 G w 31 C M Maa sNp i� W w 32 t # Do �� n v� M M .� w Ln �► -� o� 4 41 in en tm fn N w M •* it b � u 'a ** � Ake � � AI K oo t+3 0�1 s. x cl; AJ ao C Ap I- u r M � �{gg7 8 ap 1fj f© 1f �T •" 33 k S r CIO 00 Ch ON 1 w � � IY r r .nl � 9 w cn ON r ON MCw ON ON w to• low In In an 1�W M•I 4J /a. W W W C CO m $ &n n en 34 l� APPENDIX 35 A f Q Pt V f N r, O A A � A it is O • lo 4,q1 n Nl W aNN A A n h N N all ll� A� K A !q P A - w N M w� V n f .w 48 Ot eta in �n s +k C. A �y4.�Wf+• yyy� A iw iw � ttt� I N s ah PI AA W / M M td d h y. d/ .M � M k n � A W �N Al M 40 « rw M « Q y� o% w o a a A do aQ �l�rrsa � foa ` A' s+ a V ON L r C ..r wj.40n W W i.IVi L Y a c a f°-r a d 36 • `• a ni M M ao • V Y Y V + + N Ca N R1 W O a O N O N an ID N M all W IDn n N an an O •+ O O w r a0 f O f iV O �C'1 -t O � ^ n n f f N V V Y V CL as a V n n O M O p O f M W all ao w f .n v w An< O w a CD w n M f O an v m f M $ 61 N A t+ w W cMi. oMo aA , W49w�i N. ii r .w .K >w N n C? +f aM •.1 fl1 N M an f w > tv ♦q lw on * M3 M a �d May P► N A i�LJ sr aar yy ar b ra 0% 0% •.1 R A k RM M 1A a.► v ad v 1d tt y M tIt 2 2 w r M M Iv N ar sn fw fo �9 is A aA aP4 R S A R 'r }M 1 �1 (M� M v � ►moi O. x i i ddc vo r, in .moi fM Is o h am w ~ ►�' h- M }( t��{1 y�1 �p A ✓ F t�~yy i5 � a � NP 0 p� Lr ii a O 6 as t71 rs y G7 y O G O 29to V 0� O V �1 t6 ✓ ,r C Z .+ +q .+ f II� 4 4 3 L1 w .r r war e°c 6. V ayi r rMi► a' 37 N ..� m N �H f v M coO to m M +t O A • M •. v N �D m .r f co N M M � u C M a uw O rn M M hn ew� m m N ti N v OQi ti A N N .fir m n r A w ^v W rn W A SP1 off i A � � M ~ W !A N A J� w i r +r o aq� bw y F lW M1 N y tV A eti � � NI w sM A M dj v — VP R Id ,n If loft N _ 1. aI A N a r w �J r'+ d1► � • G44 11 'p x C W ON rt v u v.+ Aof Arb Zy .w H • r C N s✓ on d r, O N V N 41 v NAJ .7 L 41% vi N O p N IL vi d 3r p 8 A 0. G O ZI a N r h p N • ..fir Y x K b a d 9- m- w 94 O r+ O V 46 w AJ vM o : m of o i z W J2_ O Js I p rn L/ O v v v J V F ►� 6 6 �+ 38 z ' k m v to O O N O N p0 p m t O N hn ... m v N A N V' � N4 N4 0 im CA a all t •' v v N QQ QQ QQ y��l QQ QQ •a N 0 v1 N In N � O u n " � A N � P Oi A f� v N iw•� J1 .� .b ami M A r .O? + S rOq�q ,.� Tw •fir � .Ni w i ws +s 40 A N A N w � ! A A AI wl ll+1 1f1 A W H 40 ra w M V �a laI a+d ' sh 04 GO ON ��{ * 'Ir a A H • i11 M Hal � W Y+ fu y W ana + dF 91 44 IV « aW � W • NN"'� N fail d N -� �zJ w + + H« « i M ap r, r f « Z AA AA wE . e e r« Ls Or to Gh a aC rrOf1 'dd6 h• rdii MA yO+Or v�fOt.w•a+ r++h. vN+00fl7 -8hl e �nO Nv+rOteri Or�j L V w BCL A +o s b �wdbYO i aC #4X St : R4O 19 0+ +aifrs rtl ep f4 1O W M ++w {,L N q all If O 11 gp 11 1 q on q O q • i6.e m w m od s : t : * s ►°-r°, o0 4c 9 r f V P L N N A V • u A O m 06 co N V v'1 N C Q PR C V Z A N f M V W V A rt1 N N In O W N a r.� rl n .. n .n a t �p A ca ti ra N u O M1 O N O C-4 W f Q r11 P V f A Q W V O J1 W mW V Z V f A w ry V A M A 1j1 N P O iCl . N rig Aeft ti A v1 P W V A { I1 I1 O^+ n i • A W A A N i A O .� • ti N 4 4 a Ja P N pp J'AP t0.) N N A V ifl N A 1 n W 10, O W i m A fA AP 49 R N N N rl Y & 1T ri w aj� t ar v v rc E f M ►�" O 40 M D � w� r► � •► ro O� � R+►� +�i w �w rw w O ril Q 7 N V" to � }J� til AA Y3 #V AI 0% Q N 1�`1 Aq r'�) 1C ffffff111 w ffl to y h hl 4T Y nl � A eb v ar +.r ar id iM► .M .M A N N I h a M p ai M A ~ Q IA d+ AA7 40 tl m wa em i Ap f CwC� L 40 C s y IiC +spy f{��1 ZIP AP In t u► y }� c7 D C d g As v 7 w L «r V 4 D fY v AJ y b w i � Vii p ; �N 7 W W Z .ter .ro. �w p ri p n Q a a v i3 40 e O f � n n ,� \ •. m N Q •+N n C3 M N N_ f qy N R Q v V R J1 A N \ A R 10 A P M f b H N 44 a M i N 1 w +�► N m + w s \ ho -30, w w wt �q �l 01 N 6V h +� 1Q9 20 . M N lA iDB i v ✓moi N A y w A y1 M p~ +I ►i � �W hl A w M fV` AD M � ~r R' ..r V h A 6 IV A 44 Lam!" N tC W Ow " ro r s At 8 u " y c z D V$ C � 9 Q « ►A p1pIf 46 , fl •, s o xr " y v •- W w a 7 s v R a Vn r c a 4 o d W a �. .�. v r w 41 40 Go v Al N X A NN M •. O ♦D N 0 O v �hn O ' p � � m 1.0 w N .fir N -1 ►� PJ V 7R a �C H N iA 7N vCIO Ate/ a.l .. A n iA Q• .. , 1 YV O !,4 GQi P ,ni N A nny Qa s 7M e i n»o N C bG O! if'1 tort Al 04 w h 6A W N y � � 1t/ say Ifl � v M ♦ CQI M sr Iy N N to N N G d K ..r h K .p Ns7 iY p 6'� 'NJ~ � £�' sw-V a 4,A is ty♦ � ti d � .� n !Ii �G„ b� V � r E ♦ 7 N� m 9 er V ad pd1 C 6 . M. v w +.til Alto M rM r it Y 3 O a✓v O IA v v /6 A 7 6 ti. of , CJ. N t►s� R ti ' 42 p F A R N n0 N pp S S S �pf pp pp pppp �.pp t N p 4 O U O O O O b O Q ' F iLf f �a A A O a O +t'1 O aA O N f N ti � .r O n e N aw ai € v O Co .D m as O O v f f A r w m N P PP lT N NI A A P A f P ID N 0 F J1 4m /A kn A a rp f int O N 1f1 m ^ ^ } .. P ti N M rl N 1f1 ^� w iRt1 sr t i e mI M Wr N� Ri A A A R R M W �T �iY A •+ M +l IN N 41 Iw1 A A O �i w N A wi N fA w� �r JI �1 +n ^. 0% sus w+ M M 1i9 60 v v v v tM N M N N M w� ko � A A 1.1 � M hD O� ttj R N.0 %0 %.0 %0 �It iN � O'� M � w 7M•1 ra�IIP iN � rV vl iM1 �, dNll i a� N N M M AY IA +� w +1 M! A N M ' yF A Y�0 A rI �T.pl r J1 �I #1 M M 18 40 AW Mi M M 4'� V1 M i+l 1�. O� ►� N�J L� P'f h �. � H h P ✓1 1I1 W .Mf K f+l O M /A b� 1+fY1 !M � N � N M 0 IM A � M W r' +r4 en ® b O w+ Cow d M v 7 �°► Iti ►v+ Y w wo M y rte+ CL R 0: K M A n J d p w M• d � r ~~ L v w L z w i O 1i yY% a) ss N 3 , tlt D L Dgg A b 0 d +f • - O Off. V N J .N V d t7 2 Z m m do 1p' 6 �/J ^ — — - co a ca tV O Q O N N w �.. .. .+ O a Q I 4 i i�il✓ ♦ i0 W xA F M M 0 w� A r � rr C� Y► N �► /0la 9 Q� 9 W { if a✓ 3, r b MI }y w� Cy N a✓ �Nj N ti raj rE � AJ 0 a I p b s M tj a M Jw 1< M t CC w if d L •+ r+ ✓ Z M L O G A K L W 7 a ..fir D O Yt O Gas w J U !� F 6 6 v 44 m O O O V' O N N pQ m b O N V O C°.J a D GL V A ,tf ` a ca as .+ M M O L M D O •Y1 . O, A m �1 V N N co m � A@ M A A A •+ M tT n O a� V eA V Co N M �\ g N 10 0 S m Ch A aro.: ..i aw o aaa o' O U n s o ,o v m.. a IDO v o w at OD n N W W a 44 ... N Ul ti w )A _aA iA 414 04 } fA Y ♦ T l •/ In♦.I M V V ••, N Q a. Q QQ� t� Q �� V 1I� 4.4 ♦T V J1 � 4 ,tl "U A Iw N Q 4 Q A J1 A � iA V C3 N T A iSc7� A ai ii w •n W �► N N APof N N ••� N ID .� 4 h A ti d V 04 1Y in w N \�'►. Ji q V� M r.a Lr �°• ao M* PW ,}yam w N A: M C Y W V M M r a � rt ■+ e a 1 W A r► 46 W B N 4w W aw 66 0"It 0 a y ¢ V q t r » O r o :± ,I wol w } v -v* V O S ¢o � ao ai ••� e6 ae ¢ v b � r ab a d •% w .. s M { d p N h ae H n m m r7i A o+ 7 m A 0.A d V W ,u w C .snl a0 LaV» O�✓v 7vvm m m ar Am s a d ` ` yla N V F d 6 ale /t PJ ...._._ .._. I1 y1 t M ao a N A R+ V N O vvN m N ^ m .r N aD A N O \ N m "'� M atl f M n n n N M M V .rr V M Q N O n Q r. N 1� *4 4n A a► n �• n a r n ti M N N N f H f O aft V' L0.7 w� M TI ai'i y w w w iq Cl O M A A r Q N O � N N O t!1 aD n n ,°�' P a O •�, M ,•� w ii77 ,.w 4.1 d► 40 M w M r N .w Q� M w,r v v A A M C 8� M T a � W wi ea v* RJ N 1�1 M `YI ?� A am M fW Rl fH of f+ M (� � yY N M M 1! %W ,l/ y ✓ As t N 0" d NM � 6� d^ Y i'J n � M NA ,^jl M M r 40 N w A r M r o in in y W' p C y r +D .V+ OAC, CC d G = d 0 pD m 6 K omc r. n M b b 7 C o a i y 6 N N y Yn a � (� O C O K .V d M br .w f ,r p .r u d « Z if OV 7 W W Z .� ... ..� O u d IXc g o+ v "i .� v'�i cg oV► s a m a~i r a a' 4!i • • �f 1"9 O � A � lb M f.1 m m r C-4 i1 N M v .p N �^ N n c a O hn Cri In 4" 'o n C m W In W S N ti �' N i co N b..I H r n to in V N jA ►� W" R W N' N f+ C0 v �w A A9 � N m ! ,� � � � +moi � � +► fw W M d1 d4 Q i' /•t f� k +V PI 6 ~ A N AI 9 W fa of w f+) M u M I 1fto N /n M N N Ar M M M 6.0 M 400 At CL A � r•o e � K 8 � u w 2 6 na. D Aj qu { M G i i p Q " k' .P pal po C U ..VOL J L g 10 a. "t'1p m M W O Z d O C{erg O T WI O ma✓ � V p' My W 6 6 �..I . 47 ...�.......wivuuv, a nUnbuAY.AUUUS 1 6.1887 M 4M M' .� Street of Dr arm only a start forarea� By UAintA AU.EN apparent hostility toward the de- pment.At a var ty held for area r TIGARD--More than ltro,000 idents on the home show site I people are expected to attend the Q before the show's openin&she sz Street of Dreams home show this2y counts reflected wom t~ month on Bull Mountain. but area STREET OF DREAMS about the beauty and size of residents and city officials are look- DIRECTION MAP homes and speculation about a inc beyond the summer tragic to thethe new residents would be. development's long-range signifl- 40 "These people will be our nel canoe for the community. O boss."she said. City officials say they have no N Those neighbors,and their neL immediate plans to capitalize on the borhoods,would maks a fine ad SS million development or the traft tion to the city,according to P it will generate.But city representa• 71GARD L` Monahan.Tigard director of co �r fives and members of the local a� niunity development neiyhhorhood association agree that s "The fact that that construction taking place in an area that w baaame Tigardis a positive thief Five other Mona)=said."It carries a teem amount of pr astige.and the addict subdivisions have Q of those taetahborbood§will cm hirh-quality housing and add been approved. �� Qp level f diversity to our hat the subdivision is Just a taste ct BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD Monahan suggested that tl Street of Draatas development cou the o� ecomthcrrubdivisions on 13u11 spur more high cast development mountain MOUNTAIN OnA Bull Mountain. "Though it Aheady QccWTtng,this could sum late moue in tha near future andprompmt rove y as agton County It's&Mural fo annex�ch�o within the last gG months,With an -Al_ to want to ounert to the city for ser aye on the development Just outside tSTREET OF Its door.the city that stay be ken a DREAMS Tigard of ish may be proud study of the an�oa that may be a ptel• A �„ having the show in their arm '**We.annexation.vossed to have the Froud*ooncaded,but she added;' ; Street of Ataaams in our communis think the Street of Breams mel said Tigard Mayor Tont Urian, sonlothine different to the poop; . Even though that area is not within t who live here now. Its one am& fret&city limlta,the people who li ., suvat In the Mountain Gate aubdiv We aroathering data, to that vidod son' m#vs.county service dig. cion, which will have 206 houac Tire will shop and oto school in when the time comes,everybody can tticts, when it's all built, And Mountai Tigard, We feel largerhe Mountain make betterdedsiona." Fmude said the rittsens'group gate is only one of five major subd arca is lost of the larger Tigard cant' The gttreat of preens show,and had not taken on+otl'tclal stance on vtatons planned, Nnunity" the surrounding subdivisions, the question of annexation by "It's like this Is Just the firstwa% And It ma someday be a ti of which atvt In various stases Of per' or any other city, gf a whole Rood of davelopmertU,'• an enlarge qu k! .Tigard city, nowthough 4ts are In unincorporated T'Vudo said site was uncertain �n was gttick- point cute.a Wast61tera county. County rest• what effect the Street of!beams p iaxe onean at.4dent& who livo outside cities will would have on the poople living on ��," vote this fall on whether to forret !lull Mountain,though there was no "We're not Interested in forcing three service districts to provide any annexations."he a*14.-1 do feel urban services—one to provide that the area ew•entually will be police protection.one for wad train• j within.the city,but that's a long way tonance In urban unincorporated 1 to" arm and one for toad maintonance The Bull Mountain-Walnut ansa In lural arenas. study will assess the immediate and . Homeowners on Bull Mountain long-term urban service needs of the will have an opportunity to learn area.which includes the new detnol• more about the proposed county opmews on Buil Mountain and an seMce dlah'fcts at a="Mftg at 9:30 ` area west of Ti and between Walnutm.Aug.i@ In the Portlaid Gonoral Stnvt and Dull Mountain Road,The Electric Co.offloft,146 S.W.Old study will look at how much it Seholls perry Road. Beaverton. 1 would cost the city to provide toad. County representatives will meet sewer and police protection to the with residents to explain the dis• area,which is adjacent to the city on &lets end their costs, the west. The meeting was arranged by . Staited in June,the study has a local citizen participation organise• target completion date of next tions.Deverly lFtoude,leader of the spring.Brian said. eititem, group on Butt Mountain, Ached if the city were Interested said getting people to attend the !}' nnexitng the new subdivisions on forum was a priority of the group, i t nountafn.Brian r+epUcd:'That s "I'ar glad drat TigaM 1s doing the a delicate question, studr."she said.•`Well at least-be.. [ "We have no Immedlate'plant, able t�EF*hen apples and apples; ; but because the issue is comin&we well about facts rather ► felt it would be prudent to determine than -sling dec l- what our position will be,"he said. stars about annerstlon a city-pro 48 •'t, �� T s > L' ; .onB o "" q Y �T Hf • '° I oil _-A bid 8id • s 0 to co e ll CAH cc CL � a al's awn aa „ '� , om tiv� � � A a Xi 11 NNW .�.. I'm Ile if I i NOE x r 49 3 a .Cal _��• V� I l ,_o y .a Y w " 8 >gg� pe Ili b WAVM i - oil 1All N Lm pill Awl, a AwkA goo .... m miff- cc � � � , • 7 ; ;NEIJIM � V11 AS a� s� g 9 l v s!� so m r `7 • 1tI.�Y latus,, ,� Ky s t,it)u)1!va r r dIMIX Mitts GUN,, lkiuis� il� r {tt\It1u1 a �: �t41411) 'I�nt.tt�ktirHl - rlt� t,,,n\tntaUlus , l•lclvt,ui, �.. 'I ttkua't,,}tic 1�xs\Nn)t p rL. '•i� It kr 1.,11 t , s � o • ?,�,,. '# At1r•(>,Ilk r. 4 r 1 ANY _ t r. •ICn,llt,.,�K;; nMAK 44 ' 1 f y r air -... Q'r+'�y`^!':� ' .A -!'.,,a•. + NIT-, .77 s r r -•_"s ,�"'dr ti Y �l , �.�.Vy,., *• .y. w ..rl y'+ t sY _ 5C'? f..(.y' `7' Y •.s-®+-/; . Ji'•'43`La• 'rl r..r:. E � r, • �:i t . 5/85 WASHINGTON COUNTY - TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 19 S by WASHINGTON COUNTY, a political s ivision of the-State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY," and the CITY OF TIGARD, an incorporated municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY." WHEREAS, ORS 190.010 provides that units of local governments may enter into agreements for the performance of any or all functions and activities that a party to the agreement, its officers or agents, have authority to perform; and WHEREAS, Statewide Planning Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) requires that City, County, State and Federal agency and special district plans and actions shall be consistent with the comprehensive plans of the cities and counties and regional plans adopted under ORS Chapter 197; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission requires each jurisdiction requesting acknowledgement of compliance to submitan agreementthe setting-forth the means by which comprehensive, planning coordinationt Regional Urban Growth Boundary will be implemented; and WHEREAS plans,the UNTY and itemutuallyoadvantageouscoordinated estabtish;consistent compre- hensive1. A site-specific Urban Planning Area within the Regional Urban Growth Boundary within which both the COUNTY and the CITY maintain an interest in comprehensive planning; 2. A process for coordinating comprehensive planning and development in the Urban Planning Area; 3. Policies regarding comprehensive planning and development in the Urban Planning Area; and 4. A process to amend the Urban Planning Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Location on of the Urban Planning_Area The CUTY and the incl udesntheaarea9Area designatedaonydefined by Exhibitt *A" toethisNCITY agreement. II. Coordination of Comprehensive Planning and Development A. Amendments to or Adoption of a Comprehensive Plan or Implementing Regulation 53 Page 2 1. Definitions Comprehensive Plan as defined by OAR 660-1$-010(5) means a generalized, coordinated land use map and policy statement of the governing body of a local government that interrelates all functional and natural systems and activities relating to the use of lands, including, but not limited to, sewer and water systems, transportation systems, educational facilities, recrea- tional facilities, and natural resources and air and water quality management programs. "Comprehensive Plan" amendments do not include small tract comprehensive plan map changes. Imelementin2 Regulation means any local government zoning ordi- nance, andivision rdinance adopted under ORS 92.044 or 92.046 or similar general ordinance establishing standards for imple- menting a comprehensive plan. "Implementing regulation" does not include small tract zoning map amendments, conditional use per- mits, individual Subdivision, partitioning or planned unit devel- opment Approval or denials, annexations, variances, building permits and similar administrative-type decisions. 2. The COUNTY shall provide the CITY with the appropriate oppor- tunity to participate, review and comment on proposed amendments to or adoption of the COUNTY comprehensive plan or implementing regulations. The CITY shall provide the COUNTY with the appropriate opportunity to participate, review and comment on proposed amendments to or adoption of the CITY comprehensive plan or implementing regulations. The following procedures shall be followed by the COUNTY and the CITY to notify and involve one another in the process to amend or adopt a comprehensive plan or implementing regulation: a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the proposal, hereinafter the originating agency, shall notify the other agency, hereinafter the responding agency,, of the proposed action at the time such planning efforts are ini- tiated, but in no case less than 4S daprior to the final hearing on adoption. The specific method and level of' involvement shall be finalized by "Memorandums of Under- standing" negotiated and signed by the planning directors of the CITY and the COUNTY. The "Memorandums of Understanding" shall clearly outline the process.by which the responding agency shall participate in the adoption process. If, at the time of being notified of a proposed action, the responding agency determines it does not need to participate in the adoption process, it may waive the requirement to negotiate and sign a "Memorandum of Understanding." b. The originating agency shall transmit draft recommendations on any proposed actions to the responding agency for its review and comment before finalizing. Unless otherwise agreed to in a "Memorand un of Understanding," the responding s 54 Page 3 agency shall have ten (10) days after receipt of a draft to submit comments orally or in writing. Lack of response shall be considered "no objection" to the draft. c. The originating agency shall respond to the comments made by the responding agency either by a) revising the final recom- mendations, or b) by letter to the responding agency explaining why the comments cannot be addressed in the final draft. d. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action. If after such consideration, the originating agency acts contrary to the position of the responding agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate appeals body and procedures. e. Upon final adoption of the proposed action by the origi- nating agency, it shall transmit the adopting ordinance to the responding agency as soon as publicly available, or if not adopted by ordinance, whatever other written documen- tation is available to properly inform the responding agency of the final actions taken. B. Development Actions Requiring Individual Notice to Property Owners 1. Definition Development Action Resuiring Notice means an action by a local government which requires notifying by mail the owners of pro- perty which could potentially be affected (usually specified as a distance measured in feet) by a proposed development action which directly affects and is applied to a specific parcel or parcels. Such development actions may include, but not be limited to small tract zoning or com prehcnsive plan map amendments, conditional or special use permits, individual subdivisions, partitioning& or planned unit developments, variances, and other similar actions requiringa hearings process which is quasi-judicial in nature. 2. The COUNTY will provide the CITY with the opportunity to review and cement on proposed development actions requiring notice within the designated Urban Planning Area. The CITY will provide the COUNTY with the opportunity to review and cement on proposed development actions requiring notice within the CITY 'limits that may have an affect on unincorporated portions of the designated Urban Planning Area. 3. The following procedures shall be followed by the COUNTY and the CITY to notify one another of proposed development actions: a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the proposal , hereinafter the originating agency, shall send by r 55 Page a first class mail a copy of the public hearing notice which identifies the proposed development action to the other agency, hereinafter the responding agency, at the earliest opportunity, but no less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the scheduled public hearing. The failure of the responding agency to receive a notice shall not invalidate an action if a good faith attempt was made by the originating agency to notify the responding agency. b. The agency receiving the notice may respond at its discre- tion. Comments may be submitted in written form or an oral response may be made at the public hearing. Lack of written or oral response shall be considered "no objection" to the proposal . c. If received in a timely manner, the originating agency shall Include or attach the comments to the written staff report and respond to any concerns addressed by the responding agency in such report or orally at the hearing. d. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action. If, after such consideration, the originating agency acts contrary to the position of the responding agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate appeals body and procedures. C. Additional Coordination Requirements 1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall do the following to notify one another of proposed actions which may affect the comm4unity, but are not subject to the notification and participation require- ments contained in subsections A and B above. a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the proposed actions, hereinafter the originating agency, shall send by first class mail a copy of all public hearing agen- das which contain the proposed actions to the other agency, hereinafter the responding agency, at the earliest oppor- tunity, but no less than thrice (3) days prior to the date of the scheduled public hearing. The failure of the responding agency to receive an agenda shall not invalidate an action if a -good faith attempt was made by the originating agency to notify the responding agency. b. The agency receiving the public hearing agenda may respond at its discretion. Comments may be submitted in written form or an oral response may be made at the public hearing. Lack of written or oral response shall be considered "no objection" to the proposal . 56 Page 5 c. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action. If, after such consideration, the originating agency acts contrary to the position of the responding agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate appeals body and procedures. III. Comprehensive Planning and Development Policies_ A. Active Planning Area 1. Definition Active Planninq Area means the incorporated area and certain unin- corporat areas contiguous to the incorporated area for which the CITY conducts comprehensive planning and seeks to regulate development activities to the greatest extent possible. The CITY Active Planning Area is designated as Area A on Exhibit "A". 2. 'The CITY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning within the Active Planning Area. 3. The CITY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amend- ment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-11 within C the Active Planning Area. 4. The COUNTY shall not approve land divisions within the Active Planning Area which would create lots less than 10 acres in size, unless public sewer and water service are available to the property. ' S. The COUNTY sha11 not approve a development in the Active Planning Area if the proposal would not provide for, nor be conditioned to provide for, an enforceable plan for redevelopment to urban densities consistent with CITY's Comprehensive Plan in the future upon annexation to the CITY as indicated by the CITY Comprehensive Plan. 6. Approval of the development actions in the Active Planning Area shall be contingent upon provision of adequate urban services including sewer, water, storm drainage, streets, and police and fire protection. 7. The COUNTY shall not oppose annexation to the CITY within the CITY's Active Planning Area. e 57 Page 6 B. Area of Interest 1. Definition Area of Interest or Primary Area of Interest means unincorporated lands contiguous to the Active-Planning Area in which the CITY does not conduct comprehensive planning but in which the CITY does p maintain an interest in comprehensive planning and development ! actions by the COUNTY because of potential impacts on the CITY Active Planning Area. The CITY Area of Interest within the Urban Planning Area is designated as Area 8 on Exhibit "A". 2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and } development actions within the Area of Interest. 3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amend- required b went of the public facility planq Y OAR 660.11 within the Area of Interest. 4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject to the following; a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for development. b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. c. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other repre- sentative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest. Not contrary to this fore- going, the CITY reserves all of its rights to annex and acknowledges the rights of individual property owners to annex to the CITY pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes. d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CITY plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY designations. furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for one year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation is outdated and an amrmendment may be initiated before the one year period is over. 58 Page 7 S. The City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard have reached an agreement on a South Beaverton-North Tigard boundary establishing future annexation areas of interest. This boundary coincides with the northern Urban Planning Area boundary shown on Exhibit "A". Washington County recognizes that the future annexation area of interest boundary line may change in the future upon mutual agreement of both cities. C. Special Policies 1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall provide information of comprehensive planning and development actions to their respective recognized Community Planning Organizations (CPO) through the notice proce- dures outlined in Section III of this Agreement. 2. At least one copy of any COUNTY ordinance which proposes to (1) amend the COUNTY comprehensive plan, (2) adopt a new plan, or (3) amend the text of the COUNTY development code shall be mailed to - the CITY within five (5) days after its introduction. 3. At least one copy of any COUNTY ordinance which proposes to rezone land within one (1) mile of the corporate limits of the CITY shall be mailed to the CITY within five (5) days after its introduction. 4. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County have agreed to the following stipulations regarding the connection of Murray Boulevard from Old Scholls Ferry Road to the intersection of SW 121st Avenue and Gaarde Stre;:t: a. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County agree to amend their respective comprehensive plans to reflect the following functional classification and design considerations: 1. Designation: Collector 2. Number of Travel Lanes: 2 (plus turn lanes at major intersections) 3. Bike Lanes: Yes 14. Right-of-Way: 60 feet (plus slope easements where necessary) S. Pavement Width: 40 foot minimum 59 • a•' Page 8 f_ �. 6. Access: Limited 7. Design Speed: 35 M.P.H. 8. Minimum Turning Radius: 350 to 500 feet 9. Parking Facilities: None provided on street 10. Upon verification of need by traffic analysis, the connec- tion may be planned to eventually accommodate additional lanes at the Murray/Old Scholls Ferry and Murray/New Scholls Ferry intersections. 11. The intersection of SW 135th Avenue and the Murray Boulevard connection will be designed with Murray Boulevard as a through street with 135th Avenue terminating at the Murray connection with a "T" intersection. 12. The general alignment of the Murray Boulevard connection is illustrated in Exhibit B. b. Any changes to land use designations in the Murray Boulevard connection area shall be coordinated with all jurisdictions to assure that traffic impacts are adequately analyzed. c. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County shall support improvements to the regional transportation system as outlined in the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). d. Improvements to SW Gaarde Street between SW 121st Avenue and Pacific Highway 99W should occur coincident with the connection of Murray Boulevard from Walnut/135th Avenue to Gaarde Street. e. The City of Tigard and Washington County, with involvement by affected property owners, shall Jointly develop an alignment for the connection of Murray Boulevard between the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street and 121st Avenue/Gaarde Street intersec- tions in 1986. S. The CITY and the COUNTY shall informally establish administrative procedures and designate appropriate personnel to receive and review notices required by Sections 11 A, B and C of this Agreement. 60 •iage 9 IV. Amendments to the Urban Planning Area Agreement A. The following procedures shall be followed by the CITY and the COUNTY to amend the language of this agreement or the Urban Planning Area Boundary: 1. The CITY or COUNTY, whichever jurisdiction originates the proposal , shall submit a formal request for amendment to the responding agency. 2. The formal request shall contain the following: a. A statement describing the amendment. b. A statement of findings indicating why the proposed amendment is necessary. c. If the request is to amend the planning area boundary, a map which clearly jndicates the ,proposed change and surrounding area. 3. Upon receipt of a request for amendment from the originating agency, the responding agency shalt schedule a review of the request before the appropriate reviewing body, with said review to be held within 45 days of the date the request is received. 4. The CITY and the COUNTY shall make good faith efforts to resolve requests to amend this agreement. Upon completion of the review, the reviewing body may approve the request, deny the request, or make a determination that the proposed ,amendment warrants additional review. If it is determined that additional review is necessary, the following procedures shall be followed by the CITY and COUNTY: ' a. If inconsistencies noted by both parties cannot be resolved in the review process as outlined in Section III (3), the CITY and the COUNTY may agree to initiate a joint study. Such a study shall commence within 90 days of the date it is determined that a proposed amendment creates an Inconsistency, and shall be completed within 90 days of said date. Methodologies and procedures regulating the conduct of the joint study shall be mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the COUNTY prior to commencing the study. b. Upon completion of the joint study, the study and the recommendations drawn from it shalt be included within the record of the review. The agency considering the proposed amendment shall give careful consideration to the study prior to making a final decision. 61 Page 16 B. Prior to August 30, 1986 the parties will mutually study the following topics: Urban services provision by the County and City; the possibility of Tigard assuming active plan responsibility for a portion of the Metzger-Progress Planning Areqa as shown as an area of interest on Exhibit A; and the possible removal of a portion of Section III B.4.d., which now requires the City to maintain County plan designations for one year after the effective date of annexation. Proposed revisions to this agreement shall be considered by the parties as data is available as soon as possible after September 1, 1986. C. The parties will jointly review this Agreement every two (2) years, or more frequently if mutually needed, to evaluate the effectiveness of the processes set forth herein and to make any necessary amendments. The review process shall commence two (2) years from the date of execution and shall be completed within 60 days. Both parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any inconsistencies that may have developed since the previous review. If, after completion of the 60 day review period inconsistencies still remain, either party may terminate this Agreement. V. This Urban Planning Area Agreement repeals and replaces the Urban Planning . Area Agreement dated September 26, 1983, Washington County Resolution and Order No. 84-73, and City of Tigard Resolution 84-198. This Agreement commences on , , �� ..� 19, 142 ,,,�,• f IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Urban Planning Area Agreement on the date sat opposite their signatures. CITY OF TIGARD By , �••� 0ate ayor W ��IXGTON COUNTY t Date 8y "t +Ta,rman; Board o ountyone+ ssoners Date Recording Secretary l 62 .,y'. � J i tK2 4MOR" WN •r v WN a• 1 _ NQ WN ON • + _ 1 _ i . 1 c ' to �"� - ��' i '� (� _ ��i = •� i F t �� t 1 '� �I. -�•�. � 'r w Est, pm uz � ,` , V { �1 rl' MURRAY BLVD. CONNECTION GENERAL AUGNMENT .� EXHIBIT B soa tsss ; 602 URBM PLMNNM AREA AGF13DA ' 60t 804 501 107 ., 301 800 tag 500 109 tot 1100 100 200 1301 1300 1302 1300 100 201 101 ` 700 MURRAY BLVD, CONNECTION 64 cm or zaoA", axa00:1 '6kiiilWax'v0.72-�',C,2„ .T AN OltD=AWX fMPZA O 074JU Maee no. 66..41 WITil xgsrao r To SMR COAMMON ASM SUME na, ArMCATZows. nwaT::S 4WD SOM; ._ �c:Eii�c ai_ ra,aa,�anaxs � fat s, :.os-v Q .ss xuaa.,." .th•, Cur,it s.74 o � ts1 shee° st D,.ba a�ox'e�w NiouT smaaraosilod into ash _,Y, ,6t '� $duo , Aa�►N'r��tle►�1! t19gliF +o16 s►'$�{►�'ara lelAaP��ii or;omina ae# x6.66232 ' >4p11;611 r o�ltsa.y�smfss._ se�'i >x Vkal.,O eN•itd�rl�6t� a 4Nd bT tb* Comet% on tho 'l.4tA aduy'W 0ototwOr, 196 . aha. all "WAduous dbattto, M4 the aha e•.!�!,.a! !�7�aa ex.;ate. • s..� '��.. L ,t#Eitin>e�► a+it'#!�' #N a1t1��t t'�' S4r tla.s' e19"f b*41th and, rah#.+�'of loco'city o! Tsd� that ores= >Raaeb eta, ii•►1i1•aoet '613, d na"t1laRwle, had vt a0 b"A awoerse0d b$ tba'erdinuaata, "dove rakl,as s" �eutnutions of the vivi up _ 6s1+'ssltlti Aglpf"„Op, wIsi' �Oot „;t?iRaE010, 'bo xepoo►1o+4,wstA i�►o soaart �paarNila dig' , 1�N,tie $PC*s�ty.►to�t+sat+s0►y Quit d to "Is% *Ad , W4 *r4i a 04411 00 aw�ja�al�#ry.,tipoq,Its pas' r the Coum93.i as4 B1 taaast MM T*%* et all Cownall Maxibery po"ent, atter Utz$ bMA00V and t1tio only, ,rtl�i#,1tA',dta'r el'.,�Iq�1tc�IbNi�i xg79tr ;"Y,7- by tbo,>4►o r p+Mite MAh doy Or,s#Ot+t"O retilt. ~ 4tr r.arae gn!' . o1RFZNAj4>r� ds.T2-.>�,ct.. 65 AGREEMENT (TZGliRD) -r�THI$ AGRi:^EML•:NT made and entered Into as of the day or � u •�..'E.-.+✓ , 1970, between the CITY OF TQAi3f?, a gun goal ccz.-_ poe=ioa of the State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as / and the UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASH1:101110H COUNTY, a municipal cor-poration and county service district, hereinafter referred to as tha "Artncy", , aITNE'SSETH: WHEREAS, the Agency was duly formad and or~ganiized undezo Chaot:er ++51 ORS for the purpose of providing sewerage treatment facilitiaa within itu boundaries; and WHFJREAS, City is within the Agency by action of its Counui? And pursuant to an electim duly conducted within the boundaries of x'444 Agency; and WHEREAS, City has and doea; own and oparata, cartaln aeuara►g* facilitios within the Agency; and WHEREAS, Agency has developed a master plan for the ircplsa�artyrs.. tion of sewaxago facilities within the Agency and In in a pasitiot� to coordinate and unity treatmaat faei)Atl4s into an intogratort,zwvaraxt system for the areas within the Agency; and ' WHEREAS, City and Agency have the authority to enter into • range contracts for the cooperative operation of aervioe'roalli4i2s t under ARS 451.560 and Chapter 190 OR$; old WHFMAS, it would be in the beat intareat of the ASOncy and City • to enter into an agreement which provides for the operation and,owner- ship or curtain sewerage facilities and otter pertinent matters slating thereto; NDW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the px•emiaea and of the covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the parties harato, it •ia covanantod and agreed as follows: ' , SactiOO I. Definition cE TTeerma. A. Wherever the following terms aroused In thio agreamont, they shall have the following moaning unless otherwiae specifically indicated by the eont*xt in which th6y appears 1. OCON14ECTION CHAIM" meant An amount; of money char•fr,ed for eonnocting to the sanitary sower BY3tern. 2. "PINANCING RE!'on" mobilo • inan�cuiatna—plarno Unified ea�»cam Wash n t February, , t 0 W0110 ed ADVIOCIAtoz, 3• "INDUSTRIAL WASTES" means t%ny liquid, 020ous, rAdlo- , acti.ve.or solid waste substance or a combination thereof reoulting from any process or industrial or manufacturing business, or from the developv&nt or recovery of natural reoou_rcea. �4. "Orl-MATION AND 14AX11TENANCg" meAna the ragul,ar perfonn- ance of work requirad,to assure continues] functionms; t 66 or the sanitary sewerage system and correctivs measures taken to repair facilities to.keep theca { in operating condition. l 5. "ORDER" means Resolutions, Orders and Directs res of the Agency prescribing stapdards and conditions of use of sanitary sewerage facilities and rates and charges t1saralor. 6. "PERMIT APILICATION AND INSPECTION FEE" aae•ns fees charged an applicant for parmits and relat*d Inspection* for connectiona to the,sanitary sewerage system. T. "PERSON" means the state, any individual, public or private corporation,•'polItical subdivision, Savern- mental agency, -municipality, industry, oopartnar3hlp, association, firm, trust, estate or any other 1p.9al x entity whatsoever. • � ! 8. "SOITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM" paeans any combination of � sewage treatment plant, pumping, or lift faeil.iti**, a1 sewer pip*, force matins, laterals, manholes, side sewers, laboratory facilities and equipment, and any other facilities for the collection, conveyance, treateaent and dispogal of sanitary sawago comprising the total publicy-owned sanitary sewAralge Aynt-Om � within Agency' j urindiction, to which storm, z:urfaco and ground waters are not intentionally ad:oittod. y. "SEWER SERVICE* CHARDS" moans a regular chifto to a property owner or occupant of designated promise* for the use of the sanitary Aowerago. system. 10. "SPECIAL AUDIT" moans a financial review of the actual costs, ftderal grants, sewer bonded indebtedness, and 'other pertinent data relating to a determination of the amount payable to the City for the acquioition by the Agency of designated properties as described In this agreement. 11. "STANDARDS" means than standards and condition:, of unee or the sanitary sewerage .system a* speciriod by tho Agency. Aoct� Tori 2. 22oratins Procedures rind nel.ationhipy. W. Tho City agrees to: 1. Rnforce the standards, rule* and regulations govern-Ing the use of-tho sanitary sewerage syaYtom as pro- anulgated by the Agency, and to -notify Agency or violations requiring ACaney lopal action. 2. Obtain Agency review and approval of any permit application for industrial waste discharCe. 3. Obtain Agency review and approval of plana a.nd npaoi- E ficationa for any addition, modification or recon- struction (other than repairs) of the publ.icy-owned � sanitary sewerage aye;tern prior to undertaking work . r a:3sercon. i rat;;a 67 J1. Obtain Agency review and approval prior to eater.- � Ina Into any agreement for. the use of the sarnitary sewerage system. 5. Obtain Agency review and approval prior to Initiat- ing or entering into any agreement -for the financing or incurring of indebtedneas relating to the rani- tery sewerage sy$tem. 6. Establish in its records a separate account for the purpose of accounting for connection and user faa-i collected by the City pursuant to this agreament. 7. Use City revenues, exclusive of paysaenta racaivdd pursuant to Section 5 hereof, ariaing from this a,Creament for sewerage-rotated purpoa�sa only. 8. Allow the Agency acceas at any reasonable tinea , upon reasonable notice to inspect And test "weraga facilities within the City. , g. Grant the Agency parmita from time to time as may be necessary for the installation of sewoxage faoilttios In the public streets and ways of the City without imposing permit issuanad fees, provided that the Agency shall adhere to any conditions,roquirod pur- suant to §4571.550(7) ORS. , 10. 'fake such curative or romodiA% action -as amd ishan necessary to maintain that portion of tha publicly- owned sanitary sewerage system undor the juriodiction ' of the City in accordance with proscribed Atgancy standards, subject, however, to budgat&%7 liattationa ` and to the extent that the City sway be lawfully authorized to act. ect�. Ownerahip of FROILIti.es. ' A. The City does hereby transfer, assign and sat over to the Agency all of the City's ownership Interests in And to certain sewage treatment and collection fAcilitioo within the City, including 1. Treatment plants and appurton--mcoo: 2. Sewage collecting trunk and,intorceptor lines of 24-inch or greater diameter. 3. Equipment and supplies as not forth on the attached Exhibit "A" by reference made n part hareof. 4. Easements, rights-of-sway and permitts held by the City with respect to the foregoing "i" and "2" but subject to the terma and provisions theroof, to all of which the Agency ohanll bo bound snnd conform rnd shall save, hold ha,rmle-so and indemnify the City from any failure to conform thereto. D. The City heraby excepts; and rosnerves to itcelf tell ixrsd .or Intorout in land, except no haraltiabeve atotod, Vafre 3 , 68 inaluding lands utilized in connection with treatment Plants. treatment faeilittes; provided, however, that the: City does hereby grant to -the Agency consent for the non-exclusive use of such lands as may be necca3a*�y to enable the Agency to own, operate and maintain such facilities during continuance air this agreement. C. In consideration of the obligations of theCity under this section, the Agency shall compensate the City in accordance with Section !i of this agreeta nt. Section 4. Administration Oneration and Maintenance of A, City and Agarcy agree that: I. City will continue to operate and maintain the treatment plant and other facilities until the use of the facilities :are, in the discretion of the Agency, no longer required.. ' 2. City will procea a permit applicrationa, make ipapoc- tions of connections to tho sanitary sewerage , +system, Collect,..acgount And "cord gonngction roes, . Inspection Fees, and cower service charges withiin the purview of thia agrooment, in accordance with the orders or the Agoney. �� 3. City will resm# to the Ageney.on a mothly basis, n �. with a report on Agency-dosignate+d forts, the rol- C lowing amounts: a. Forty (40%) par cant of all permit and inspection t'ooit. b. Thirty (30x) per cont of all Dower service ;"• charas collected. '3 1� C. , Eighty (80x) per cent of ell connection chlsrgen collected. 4. City will diligently maintain raguiar billi.ngo And collection or feees, adjust complainto thereto, sued pursue delinquency follow-upn and tak" raaaonsble steps for collection thereof. S. Agency cay at Any rea2onablo time upon reacona:blm notice inspect and audit the books and records or the City with respect to mattorn within the purview of this agreement. 6. 'Pita City taatd the Agency may each need extra help rrot time to time that alight be: supplied by tho othar. In ouch a cane, either City or the Agency in ussilix_ � ing the zervicesa or an employee of tho other, shall , pay the handing governmant an follous., thea amp).t)y0a e c salary rate currently in crrect for the titnee #Orked plus twenty-five (25r) per cent thereaor. PASO h 69 Section 5. Comoensation. A. The Agency agrees to compeasatsthe City for the acquini- tion of Its sewerage facilities as identifiod in Exhibit "Aa attached hereto an incorporated harei.ra, the total amount of $ 535,049.00'. , payable i:a the manner following: 1. The sum of 370,000., paid to the City upon executions of this agreement, the receipt whereof it hereby acknowledged. 2. Pre-existing general obligation sewerage facility bonds; As partial payment duo the City, the Agency hereby e>grees3 to pay to the Cltyy or as City -may direct, not lass than ton (10) days prior to due data, a- cum sufficient to enable the City tb' pay principal and Interest on all general oblidition bonda of ithe City according to the amortization achedulea of each Issue no and when same fall due, with respect to sewerage faailitiaa of the Citx, inOuding those let forth in Exhibit "A". Compensation to the City from the Agency,for VOW- cipal sums required for bonded debt service only Oall be applied in reduction of the defearretd balanae of Agency's obligations hereunder; interest phymen.n ! 'on bonded dobts hereunder *hall constitute intariast duo the City on that portion of the daforred balwioa of the Agency's obligations hearounder roprovantad ' by the City's ,bonded indabtedneoa to harain 4eflnod. 3. The balance of the Agana In obligations to the City t'or trunafvr of the f� cilitlas hereunder aha1:. be paid by the Agency to the Ct i annual Install- ; moats, each not lens's thaun4$ ,�,'44�•4� ,1� µ.'.:;�, ' . Interest on deferred balanci"it Cho :r of fiva (5x) per cant per annum From July X 19 0 until paid the first payment o ,ea ma a e,n or a ors July ,l, 19f2'and a .like payment on or befera Jt%ly of each aaUndar yaAr theroafter. Sgeit,lgn n. Other Provinions. A.. The City and the Agency further agrees that: s 1. The Agency will not extend cervices to areas outnide the City and outside existing sanitary diatricts except with the, prior approval of the City where use of City facilities is necessary to serve such area, or wherw,nuch areas faro contiguous to or in the near vicinity of the City's boundaries. 2. Tho installation and conatruction, and this finan+ci.no thereof, of newer linea and faciiitios having a diameter of iota than 24 inches; aro doetnad to be within tho jurisdiwtion and control of the City, unloiss othorvites agreed to by tete Agency. Such Pace 5 70 installaction aitd construction shall be 'made is accordance with this agreament. Agency hill not establish local asuessment diutricts as provid4d by Chapter 451 OILS. E 3• Tha City and the Agency trill each obtain such instar- ance contracts as necessary to cover the liabilities or the Cit} and the Agency respectively ro., the risks and limits set forth in 130.260 of zcoq QRS, and each of the parties hereto shall gauss the other to be named as co-insured on the policy or the other consistent with the obligations or each of the par- ties under the terms of this contract. tt. At such time as the 'Ag4noy shall discontinua opera- tion or use of any facilities on City--owned preniaes, the Agency shall remove such equipmentfacilltIaa or fixturesthorarrom for a period ot.six (6) months after' ouch discontinuance or such 'faailitios shall become City proporty, provided that to the extont � the Agency shall demolish or remove faalli.tlua, the sites thereof shall be lert free and clear of all residue and debris and in good order and condition. } This agroemont shall be affective upon its execution by both partios horeto and shall continue in effect for a tosm of thirty (go) yours from and after the date hereof. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF this instrument has boon executed in dupli- cate pursuant to resolutions heretofore duly and legally adopted by oaah or the parties signatory hereto. UNIFIED SWERAOE ACENCY VV As To F r. OF WASNTN0TON COMITY, OnEOON Ca�nr� Co�e�w�cl Jw 8y W�.h9ug�oo sountr,�r,r. . oar4 o own•y amm ae flnorh or ashington County, Us the novarning body or the Dnit'ied Sswarage AStney. CITY OA TICARD• OPLOO11 49by CJD". f RY,..,�t�!✓i.L�ten��..►-r7LQ�3J+tsl..+t' y ruw�c or Mayor By • ]tenor ' t • ADDENDA 1. page 5. Section 5-A2; following the complete paragraph ending with the words "net forth in Exhibit 'A'". add "payments will commence on or before July,1, 1972 Ira accordance with the amortization schedule nhown in Exhibit '81." 2. Page 5, Section 5-A3; following the end of the paragrap;i, add "Such payments to be imadee, over a period not to exceed twenty years." 3. Page. 6. Section 6-A-4i the latter oeetion of which zoada. "the sites thereof shall be left free and clear of All residue and debris and In good order and co &-- tion." to read. "the sites tharoof *ball ba left fr90 and clear of All demolition waste and debiis." 72 - A-1 Treatment Plant and Appurtenaur.-as (a) Hain Lift Station:_Ivo 10 S.P. =tcxn and pump3, atructura, ' piping. valves and control oquir„azo,. . (b) control Buildings, Euilding structure. boiler. control -zinal. flow rocordar, sludge p;up, nen.ux, wat= closet, bot eater baar:+ -. a1xup nw.ma, XQ- circulation AumP, piping, vitiv04 ztA ti-..'rad items. , (c) Grit Channals Structure. gates and flog aadb4xi nq equipment. (d) Primaxy Digo3tors Streicturo, piping and valvaa. (a) Socondary Digesters Structure. piping, valvae and supor- natant controls. (f) Primary clarifiers Stxucture; valves, pipipg, drive mochaniam, and saotor. (9) Diversion Structures Struetuxe, piping and valvers. (h) S*condary Clarifier valves; Piping, driva n+acha►nian and motor. (i) Activated Sltedge basins Structur*s, piping, vn%-oan, tvo adratoro# and two 10 ii.P. a2fluemt pt,mp3. + (i) Aerobic Di gaat vn 04vini S tructorsrs', Piping# a"Ali, c,►lorias�► contact buoin, and one n*ratc+r. (k) Chlorine Muipmont bldVos Structure, chlorine oquipirvat, hoLut ng equipment, %ruate eXud90 r.i=p, control panel, scala* and fixed arqui,innsat. (1) Recirculation Pump Stations Two 711 H.L. aubmarxibla recir- culation pumps and related control v,,pdp- matt, , (ta) yilter Ptarp Stations 4%00 7N ti.i+. PUMP* and t gtotr3, atructor,;t, piping, valves, control bquipment, atuap pans., and wamhdown paurip, (at) Hock piltera+t fir► rock ftitors, str.ucturvA, pipisr;, rr~'e"' valves, and diu tribution nyu tt+m. 73 to) Final cl.a.rltl,=z "eo clurifi%r stzucturcL-%. drive r-mchaniuma and raoWra- �R (p) old Chlorins Contac: Ta-ikc StXUCture OAI.%". r. (q) yard piping & 1 iscellaneouu: All undax'g.ou.d utiliti.na betwoon structure or rslated utilitiaa, diveruion boxes, stand pipe, waste burAw , conducta, val;•.aa, raanholes and nateri r.g cqu ipsaent. A-2 Scro-.%r Linea 24" or greater (a) 24" Interceptor (Clay Of Tig=d) A-3 111,Ap Stations , (a) Durnham Street Pump Station (City) (b) ronjta Street Pump station (City) Page 2 Pbchihit W 74 C` e Exhibit -A- p.. V END-44MMI T TO CO:ti`?;i.ACT Dottr�cn tha City of Tigard and the Unified ftency or Uazhington County, Oregon Dut_d Sant-=-cber 0, 1974 Irl+ a.' 4AGR1:;!�iD bz Mwoli!n the CITY OP i,.r.GARD and t-li `:i1.l i�wawa7, S::ii�,i A0 1=NCY OF W';S:i1N0--10 i COUNTY, OR MON that :Lw owia .lxrattan (-P V144 :all+WA. b,2A41it3 to L* attAlntd 110rOuNdUP, P-;rgra-:)b "3 or :l�c:t3 an a or uald contraut be, Und the same 3a hereby, amend,.!td to ' City Ana who Ajenay will each obUiln amah oontracta. as naoo4aury to cov*r t:aeir ra3poatlw liabilitioa arialnC out or this c4rtumpt Asad each or the partioa horato nha.11 prov..dai *writton ovidenoo or such imuranea Cor lialta o: liability not leas than those sot Forth in OR3 30.270. Such 3nauranoo aontrActo *hall provide for r►;, least 30 dAyx 'aritton uoltci to be givan thv other party in tha ovhrt osmilla:ion." Xr% all ol4l. t+ roaspaota o.gLd t3roemdnt bomrit%Z dato c,C Soptvrx- tsar u, 1910 bn, Gn d tho ex4v is heroby, rafi:flod artd conrirmad. ; 1'f :iZxNh,".;i 1.1111REOt+, thls 7,natrmtnt heo boon u.+muted In d,%plicW;v purauunt to r4'roludi0n3 hisrotororn duly &nd IuUally &4optud ay emote or %lie }ire ti4►a M SAAtory her+xto. WiMED 11SWt 1- 043r AOMCY OS' 41A"lita�43'411,L`►111i�"�, +1;:x�SC1l MR,Xx°:tA4t ,11111 c>Ar:�o�L+�y �::►;as nn ��+x�•:4 body cof thu UAMI Sm.tom ,4 4'xo'-fey • L/ •a�y � •!�'�I 'rwr.wK..�r��•r✓rrr',� � .r.Yrf• • ��llllllllii7 'Y 75 • e US AGREES F2%V . � U,CA RE.O 72-9 HIS :�r.Z.t'�.:.-�. ::a, ;.law:' .1I1:.� vn��:iti 1:2wA O4' .3:anusry, ::li., LLtwaSLl: :•: V:2_a.`_ed 'w•SI1Jd 'M'4oalcy of Wiwhinfjtoll incorp aratcKl 0�S Ci:safer •;51 t oulit;^ Service ViutriCt, to " :a:i ."��y�:iL'�•T , a1,.1 t!10 City Of T1Rsiri], Z :r.:ricipal sorparaci�:l ��, r;•; Shat•: oration, hereinafter referred to as "City", tr':+ERk.aS ;adl_.;uanc to t'iL � tra.:x :.4twictan City and Acjdncy, dated D;;i3t6at*=r 8, 1970, City saes zl-r.z! a:,. *ain t;.Q treatment plant and anter facilities for se tr:l7e trc.-,zm:z3: +i�.;tin t::e city limits of City; WHERZAS, City is dasira:as of :.y•:r,;:y as:.unain.; :::e opLration and maintenance raspor*ibility of the �t�.:t,::��}R wzvjt.-Zn: ;)lent wni4 n for»rly belonged to City; and WHERF,"%S it would be in the >hat intra,;:.:: 0: .1geto.:y a;I City to agrae to Agency assuming the operation anJ nai,nt+:nartc:-.., resuonaibility of said sewerage treatment plant, with the appruuriata chin,3v of ravenue distribution by City; NOW,TIM=FORE, in Consideration of the pra:Aiu%ia .t:i � t}lad covgriallts ard agreementXto be kapt and performed by tba' parties h%P"t.'.u, it i;x covenanted and agreed as follows: 1• socti dated �1. of that contract between City and AVansy, 6, 1970, concerning purchaser of nowarAVO facilities by Agency and the distribution of maintensr«:a and operational responsibilities between Agency un,j City, be, and hereby its, deleted in its entirety from acid agreement, and thea following lanquage shall be ins"rtead in its placer "Effective rebruary 1, 1972, and thereafter, the Agency shall operate and maintain the treatment plant Tend pwfp stations. The City shall continue to operate anu maintain all other facilities of the Collectionayyatom. Agency shall operate and maintain the treatmeant ph.ant until, in the sole diacretion of the Agency, the: use of said treatment plant is no longer requ rod." 2. section +4. A. 3& bo of thea above eie®eriberd contract, dated December 00 1970, be# and hore by is, deleted in its entiretyy e� from said agreement, and that t following languages shall iM inserted in its places "Deventy percent (709) of all newer service charges Collected." 3. The remainder of said agreement, dated 0, 1970, ansl ench Fart thereof, be, and hereby in, rratitieed, readopted, rind continued in full force and vff+act hyand betwocin tba partion hereto. IN WITNESS WHERMr, thin :instrument has been executed in duplicate pursuant to resolutions heretofore duly and legally adopted by each of the parties signatory hereto. CITY !'IGARD, OREGON UNI 18 SEWERAGE AGEoCy C • / e cvAst N COMTY', ORMON IIy 7�8y C�S re'l" Board of-County Commits uones 33y ea Washington County, Oregon Rne•n+-r+.,.v ''' :'' iss the governinq bodv of thea tim fi r.A 76 A 1 I t i i COMMENxS AND RESPONSES FROM VARIOUS JURISDICTIONS j E 77 TIGARD PUSUC SCHe OLL DIST RICr 2M on AdmWsuation Office 13137 S.W.Pacific Highway Tigard,Oregon 47223 WARM Arca Code 1503)620-1620 February 19, 1988 Mr. Bob Jean City Administrator City of Tigard) P.O. Box 23997 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bob: We have reviewed the "Draft Final" copy of the Bull Mountain/Walnut Aron Urban Services Study *nd wish to peas on to you the following comments or reactions to the information contained in the study. As you know, the Tigard School District is experiencing ' significant annual increases in student enrollment. It has long boon a policy of the school district's Board of Directors to not oppose development causing those increases but instead to provide for such growth by having adequate classroom spaces and related school facilities available when needed. You are also well aware of they potential impact that full development of the Bull Mountain area will likely have on school enrollments ov@r the next several years. With that in mind, there are three main comments we have at this time relative to the study. First, the Dull Mountain/Walnut Study Area map does not reflect the recent change in the Urban Growth Boundary which occurred late in 1987. One of the impacts of that change was to bring inside the UGB an 18-acre site owned by the school district and located at S.W. 131st and Beef Bend Road. This, along with the "tnstitutio>Aal" zoning designation which has been approved for that property, makes it possible for the school district to plan for an elementary school on that site at some point in the future. With the anticipated development In the Bull Mountain area, this obviously becomes a critical factor in school district plena for providing for increased enrollments. r` 78 Secondly, the "Area of Interest" shown on the slap of the Hull Mountain/Walnut Study Area does not include our Beef Bend school site and, therefore, is apparently not at this time being considered for annexation into the City of Tigard. With the change in the Urban Growth Boundary, it appears to make sense to have the new area included in the city boundaries of Tigard and we would recommend that option be pursued. Finally, enclosed is a copy of a letter we sent to Keith Liden in June, 1987 regarding an interest we have in seeing traffic patterns improved between the Bull Mountain area and Mary Woodward Elementary School. Beginning with the 1988-89 school year, all elementary-age students living in the area went of Pacific highway will be attending Mary Woodward. As the letter states, any plans which will result in a more direct route from Bull Mountain to the school Would have a significant positive impact on our tronsportation situation and have the full support of the school district. Thank you for furnishing us with a copy of the Urban Services Study and providing us with 4" opportunity to comment. If you have questions or need further information. please let me know. Sincerely, j R *sell Joki, Superintendent Enclosures Growth ary has chwWod NOTEt line should ® noted that while the address ad by the School DUrban trict tai louts de of the study area and would not effect this report.' 79 &Adn*14-tradon IGlMD pUBUC SCHOOLS.DISTRICT 23J Office 3137 S.W.F-4&ic HQhwwaY Tkjwd.Oregon 97223 Area code 15031620-1620 June 4. 1987 Mr. Keith Lidos City of Tigard 131.25 S.tV. :.'all Tigard. Oregon 97223 Roar Keith: As a result of the residential dovoioAmant on Bull Mountain and the planned expansion of Mary Woodward slemontary School to accomodato children from that area, we haves an interest sin supporting ystem between aBull ny �Mountain andforts to rS.+W. t12lathe aStreet,0.tion y it is our understanding that discussions have or aro tsking place regarding the extension of S.W. 121st in a southerly direction, thus providing a more direct rout* to Bull Mountain Road. This development, if it wore to occur+ would greatly improve school bus transportation patterns. We wish considering, andaweswouldting appreciatechavingsthe copiesiOf the be co plana. it we can be matter. pleasendolved in any not hesitat*utorlotiusuknowl.s on this Si nceroly, Russ Joki, Superintendent 3 a Y s0 T t 6 A R D WATER DISTRICT 8B41 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. TIGARD.OREGON 97223.6290 " PHONE (503) 639-15513 i February 19, 1988 Robert W. Jean City Administrator 13125 SW mall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re; Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study Dear Bob; i Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject study. 1 have reviewed they study and find that it is very comprehensive. Tigard Water District, too, perceives future problems to i adequately serve water to the Buil Mountain area. Enclosed is a recant study pertaining to this matter. As a result of the ► recommendations contained therein, the water district will, within the next month, complete the installation of a parallel lb-inch water main between the 10-MG reservoir (at 125th and Bull Mountain Road) and Hi Tor reservoir on top of Bull Mountain. Also, additional pumping capacity has been added at the 132nd Street pump atation. Mans are presently being drafted to construct a new 1-MG reservoir on district-owned property at Hi Tor in 1992. ' it is my view that no matter which governmental entity assumes responsibility for this area (null Mountain) , there are major problems ahead. Particularly, at some point in time, the vehicular traffic problem must be addressed, and the costs will be substantial. Personally, 1 like the more demanding, consistent utility requirements of the city versus the county when now developments are planned. This includes curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, etc. So, good luck on your plan and there is plenty of work ahead no matter which governmental body assumes responsibility. t Sincerely yours, NOTES The original copy of the referenced "Water Supply Plan For 40 Bull Mountain Area - Tigard e�bert antee Water District - 9/85" is on Administrator file at the office of the Tigard City Recorder. 89 f )%V AMOY& P.O.BOX 127•TUALATIN.OREGON 97062•PHONE 6+B2%Z601 February 22, 1988 Robert W. Jean City Administrator City of Tigard P.O. Sox 23397 Tigard, 4R 97223 RE: .Bull Mtn./Walnut Area Urban Serviceas Study Dear Bob, The draft final of the Bull Mtn. Service study appears to toot the needs of the Tualatin Fire District. We would like to see a :statement regarding water supplies that would, require developers to assure a continuances of presort Tigard Water District practices. Adequate supply lines and hydrants are important to this department. Otherwise,, the document is well written. Sincerely, Floyd Pittard Fire Chief FLP/nd cc: Bob Santa*, Tigard Water District i 82 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON March 8, 1988 Robert W. Jean City Administratcr City ofTigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O." Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bob: In response to your Draft Final Urban Services Study for the Bull Mountain area, I would provide the following comments. This letter will also serve as a response to your February 22 letter concerning coordinated city/county land use planning and public facilities planning in the Bull Mountain/Walnut Area. In regard to the coordinated land use and public facilities planning, you are aware the city has active planning responsibilities for a portion of the area and the remaining area is within the area of interest of the City of Tigard. Our department coordinates all development activity and planning within this area with the City of Tigard. This approach appears to be working satisfactorily. At this time I do not foresee any need to change this arrangement, but I agree we need to work closely. In responso to the Urban Services Study I have asked my staff to review the document. The study obviously shows the reasons for property owners to annex to the City of Tigard. I believe it can be accurately stated that the residents of Bull Mountain may indeed receive better public facilities and services through eventual annexation. However, in reviewing the document It appears that the authors present an overly bright picture of life after annexation in the City of Tigard and at the same time, intentionally or unintentionally, present an overly gloomly picture (and sometimes an erroneous view) of existence in unincorporated Washington County. The following are areas of the report which we believe are in error or need changes made in order to present an accurate picture of before and after annexation. 1. Page 1, Findings: Planning services are limited to case-by-case plan review at the time of application, with little staff time for long-range planning; 83 Department of Land Use And Transportation,Administration 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/848-8761 Robert Jean March 4, 1988 . -Page 2 f, Comment: The Planning Division of the Department of Land Use and Trsnportation works almost exclusively on long-range planning and related issues. The Planning Division currently has fifteen full-time employees. The Planning Division work program reflects Board direction and has placed major efforts during the past two years on major transportation issues rather than community planning. 2. Page 2, Findings: The County does not currently provide for storm drainaa in the area, although a County Storm Drainage District and a 12 per month per household fee is under study; Comment: Storm drainage is not provided in most of the Bull Mountain area ecause it is still essentially rural. Recently approved subdivisions have been required to install storm drainage facilities, as A condition of approval, that are adequate to address their immediate impacts and to accommodate future growth. 3. Page 2, Findings: Service Count /Dy istrict City Police 85 (0 850thousand) $200 included in Street Maintenance 60 (0 $60/year) City tax rate Street Lights 60 (@ 4-5/month) estimated at $2 Parks & Recreation $147 (0 31.47/thousand) per 1,000 ($2.03 t� actual in 1987-88) Storm Drainage 24 @2/month 1g.50/month) Annus os u n a nut ar Comment: This chart is misleading. It gives the impression that the City of-- igard provides the same level of Parks and Recreation facilities and services as TNPRD, when in fact the City provides only minimal facilities. The annual cast comparison would be more accurate if the $147 for Parks and Recreation was deleted. I do not believe that any of the study is currently in TNPRD, and know of no efforts to expand the district into the Bull Mountain area. The number used for street maintenance again is an estimate which the Department has used in our work on the County Service District. This number may be either higher or lower based upon action by the Board of County Commissioners. Initial estimates show that it will be lower. This figure should be marked to indicate that the funding will be voted on this June. Also storm drainage is identified in both the County Service District approach and in the City, it is my understanding that the Service District proposal will include all of Washington County including incorporated areas. Therefore this number should either be deleted at this time or a number should be used that is consistent both Inside and outside of the cities. The street light costs appear to be ( high. On average in unincorporated areas of Washington County street lights run between $4S and $SO a year. These changes would make a more reasonable cost comparison for the Buil Mountain area at $223 versus the City of Tigard at $218. 84 Robert Jean •• March 4, 1988 . ,Page 3 4. Page 2, Findings: Annexation includes long-range land use planning and public facility programming services from the City at no additional cost; Comment: This statement implies that the County charges extra for long-range planning and public facility planning. The County finances both services from the general County revenues. S. Page 3, (introduction): Growth and development is occurring under current Comprehensive Plans with or without the adequate Public Facility Plans. Comment: This statement is incorrect. Public facility master plans av1•i e=een developed by USA for sewer service, by Tigard Water District for water service, and by Washington County for transportation facilities. Only a master storm drainage plan is unavailable at this time. b. Page 3, Conclusions: Needed levels of urban services either are not available through the County, or are available more conveniently and less expensively for comparable services from the City of Tigard upon annexation. Comment: This statement is not correct. All critical and essential services, as defined by the Washington Coun-y' Community Development Code, are available to those areas of Bull Mountain currently undergoing development. Development cannot be approved unless services are available. "Needed levels" should be defined or deleted. 7. Page 3, Conclusions: Needed street immpprovements, like Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street, are unlikely in the foreseeable future without annexation. Comments This statement is misleading. It suggest that the City is a e o finance certain road projects. There is no objective evidence to support/ the contention that the City of Tigard can finance major Improvements to Bull Mountain Road and Walnut St',aeet any sooner than Washington *.ounty is able to. k `. 85 •• Robert Jean March 4, 1988 Page 4 8. Page 3, Conclusions: Meanwhile, each year without annexation means the loss of TIF revenues out of the area, continued loss of abandoned revenues, and the continued lack of long-range Public Facilities Plans coordinated with the Comprehensive land Use Plans, driving up both the community's and the City's long-range costs. Consnent: Again, there is an incorrect reference to the lack of public facility plans. Also, no evidence is submitted supporting the claim that unincorporated development adds "long-range" costs. It should also be noted that approximately12� 6,000 in Traffic Impact Fees were spent on Bull Mountain Road in conjunction with the Mountain Gate Subdivision in 1987. During the same year approximately 162,000 in TIF Revenues were collected in the entire Bull Mountain area. 8. Page S, What Annexation Changes: Streets W Washington County 0 All major road improvements are through LIDs No local street maintenance now or form Local Street a District at $60 per year extra. Comment: These statements are incorrect. Washington County uses LIDs as one way of improving the county road system. In those cases where LIDs are used for major roads only the local road component of these roads have been constructed with LID funds. This is true of 158th, Cornell Road. Kemmer Road and many others. The more common method for improvement of the County major system has been states federal, system development changes and county road funds. The County does provide a E minimum level of safety and hazard elimination maintenance on the local road system today. This amounts to approximately $3600000 in the urban unincorporated area. The $60 per year is an estimate that has been used as part of the prepartion for forming the CSD for Local Road Maintenance. This number may vary as the Citizen Advisory and the Board of County Commissioners review the budget and scope of work planned for the District. Preliminary indications are that this amount will be about 1S-20% less than originally planned. 9. Page 11, Land Use and Development Patterns: Other exceptions Include an R-5 designation for the Hawk Ridge development on 150th Avenue and an R-3 designation for the Mountaingate subdivsion in the Street of Dreams area. There is no commercial or industrial land in the study area. Comment: This statement makes reference to an R-3 designation. Washingfon County has no such designation. 86 t Robert Jean j March 4, 1988 i Page 5 - F C r 10. Page 19, Washington County "2000" Plan: In order to cope with consistently under-funded urban services programs, Washington County has proposed a plan to provide road maintenance and police services to urban unincorporated areas until these areas annex to municipalities - a process the County views as inevitable. The County 2000 plan provides for "interim service" i until 1992-93, at which time the County expects annexation procedures to be in place for most unincorporated areas. The County 2000 plan is an attempt by Washington County to fit limited resources to service demands in view of population growth and the subsequent demands on urban services which result. Basically, the plan covers two areas which need immediate attention. Comment: This section does not completely describe the County 2000 aP'i-n- -Tt leaves out reference to the fact that 92-93 is not an absolute end date for the provision of "interim service", but rather a review E date to determine if these programs should continue based on annexation activity and cost-effectiveness. Overall, the entire concept of County 2000 is not accurately reflected here. The overall concept should be summarized as a decision on the part of tho County to fund only countywide services with countywide tax revenues. Specially benefited areas or groups must pay their own way. This can be done either through annexation to an existing city or through establishement of county service districts, which the County and its unincorporated residents have elected to pursue on a limited basis. 11. Page 200 Police Services: Currently the response time for priority 1 and 2 calls to the Sheriff's Office are in the neighborhood of 15 minutes or more. For priority 3 or 4 calls the response time is up to an hour. For some. calls there is no response at all. Comment: The statement "for some calls there is no response at all" sug-- gess that some calls are ignored by the Sheriffs Office. It would be more Informative to state that some calls are handled over the phone rather than In person. I would advise you to have the Sheriff comment on this area since the CSU for enhanced Sheriffs Patrol is newly funded. 12. Page 20, Police Services: The enhanced sheriff patrol district will be funded by a voter-approved levy of $0.78 per 1,000 assessed value for property owners. This translates into $67.88 per year for a single family dwelling valued at $87,000. C 87 Robert Jean March 4, 1988 . .Page b Comment: This statement is incorrect. The enhanced sheriff patrol zs� t'—ict will be funded by a three year "fixed amount" levy ($3,371,000/year) with an estimated tax rate of $0.85/thousand of assessed value in fiscal year 1988-89. Tax rates in subsequent years will likely be lower. 13. Page 25, Planning and Development Services: Planning and development services are currently provided by the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation in conjunction with the Neighborhood Citizen Participation Organization for Bull Mountain. Their collaboration has produced a community plan for Bull Mountain which is very general in nature but prescribes some specific guidelines for development in this area. Comments: This paragraph strongly implies that Washington County as prepared an abbreviated and makeshift plan for the Bull Mountain Area. This is not the case. The Bull Mountain Community Plan was created individually over an extended period of time as part of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan. It was developed in accordance with the LCDC Goals and Guidelines, and received acknowledgement of compliance from LCDC in 1983. This plan is an specific and complete as any city plan in the County, Conclusion: With the changes identified above I believe that the oa cument ;ou1d present an accurate picture of the situation in the Bull Mountain area before and after annexation. I appreciate the opportunity to review this document and provide comments to the city. If you have an questions concerning my comment or would like any additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, Bruce A. Warner, P.E. Director e: Board of County Commissioners County Administrators Office Division Managers CPO #4, Bull Mountain BULLMT/br 88 AF Ift UNMEO SEWERAGEAGENCYOFWASHINGTON COUNTY August 3, 1988 Mandy Clarno City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Sewer Extensions Dear Randy; Please consider this letter as written confirmation of our telephone conversation this morning regarding procedures to extend sewer mains in the vicinity of Tigard that utilize city facilities, When asked for sewer service that would require the use of city facilities, Agency staff generally responds by either referring the customer to the City of Tigard or requesting from the City of Tigard permission to extend such sewer mains. The basis for this practice is the city/Agency agreement dated September 6, 1970, More specifically, the section providing this basis is as [" follows= ` "Section 6. other Provisions. A. The City and the Agency further agree that: 1. The Agency will not extend services to areas outside the City and outside existing sanitary districts except with the prior approval of the City where use of City facilities is necessary to serve such arca, or where such areas are contiguous to or in the near vicinity of the City' s boundaries. " 3 hope this information proves to be helpful to you. Should you require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me. 7obe�r6tC. ruly yours, C zt Manager Collection sr�tems Division J 828 ( c: Chris Bowles r 89 t 150 North First Avenue,Room 302 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/848-8821 r EXCERPT FROM TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN c. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE URBAN SERVICES TO AREAS WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA OR WITH THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY UPON ANNEXATION. 10.1.2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS OF LAND BY THE CITY SHALL SE BASED ON FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING: a. THE ANNEXATION ELIMINATES AN EXISTING "POCKET" OR "ISLAND" OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY; OR b. THE ANNEXATION WILL NOT CREATE AN IRREGULAR BOUNDARY THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR THE POLICE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARCEL IS WITHIN OR OUTSIDE THE CITY; c. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS COMMENTED UPON THE ANNEXATION; d, THE, LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AND IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY BOUNDARY. e. THE ANNEXATION CAN BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE SERVICES LISTED IN 10.1.10). 10.2 EXTENSION OF SERVICES OUTSIDE THE CITY LTMTTS OLICIES 10.2.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF CITY OR UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY (USA) LINES EXCEPT; , a. WHERE APPLICATIONS FOR ANNEXATION FOR THOSE PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY; OR b. WHERE A NONRCMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT TO ANNEX THOSE PROPCRTICS HAS BEEN SIGNED AND RECORDED WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY AND SUBMITTED TO THC CITY; OR c. WHERE THE APPLICAULE STATE OR COUNTY HEALTH AGENCY HAS DECLARED THAT THERE IS A POTCNTIAL OR IMMINENT HEALTH HAZARD. 10.2.2 IN ADDITION TO THC RCQUIRCMENTS OF POLICY 10.2.1, THE EXTENSION OF SEWER LINES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS SHALL NOT REDUCE THE CAPACITY BELOW THE REQUIRED LEVEL FOR AREAS WITHIN THE CITY, 10.2.3 AS A PRECONDITION TO THE APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION OF SERVICES OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMIT£, THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT 'OF REVIEW FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS OUTSIDE THE TIGARD CITY LIMITS BUT WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA (REFERENCE TIGARD-S URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENTS WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY). T14E CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT: a. PRECLUDE THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTIES TO URBAN DENSITIES AND STANDARDS; OR 'r 90 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: _ August 15>_ 1488 DAZE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1588 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ICMA Retirement PREVIOUS ACTION: Corp. Deferred Comp. Plan — Resolution for LOC to File Amicus Curiae Brie ' PREPARED BY: _-J. Morley DEPT HEAD OK ! CITY ADMIN OK ;r_(_ . REQUESTED BY: J. Monle� POLICY ISSUE. Strengthening our employee retirement: plan, INFORMATION SUMARY Retirement: coverage for, our general arid management employees has evolved over, the last several years, Prior to 1946. tt•►ese two groups were covered under an either/or situation where each employee chose either at City--paid IWA or a City contribution to duferrod compensation, In 1986, this either./or choices was replaced with a Money Purch+ase Plan wheroin the City contributo%s a de-signated per-cent to each employee's account, Due to unique lsanguotjo in the Oregon State Contribution, the carrier, of our dofarrod componsation pl4an has not boon able to offer stue:k invoutn►c►r►ts t.a our employees who choue prior, to 1906 the dofer•rod cowpon,.enation option, In addition, this affected e;urront: umployetas who der0r•r,ead t.hoir own uarninj% into our deferred comporvaot:ion plan, 11-1iu iuuue is k►eiing prournt.od to thea :tato Supromo Court. Our, c4i►rrior, the 1CMARot:iromont Cor,por;ation, h Au askod our, heal;) in gaining the attention it) th►is matter by the Supromo Court , Thoy have asked us to quickly pMss +a rosolution asking thea t:oAquo of Orejon Cltiau to act au the lead in aubmitt:inl a friend of tho courtbrief, lime► it' ir+►portant as the Supromo Court filing deadlines is August 24, 1980. .r T,...�._ . .... ..... . ..... . A1.717RNAT IM CONSIDFR1 0 FISCALI.Mt)CT { i f Nona Recommend passago of Lha i.ttnechod rosolution, cs/6443D Attachment l�