Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/28/1988 e I MEN r MEETING UPDATE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING.AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA - (CATV) sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, MARCH 28, 1988, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by cohtacting either the Mayor or City -Administrator. :30 o STUDY SESSION & EXECUTIVE SESSION - The ;Tigard City Council will go into Executive Sessionunderthe provisions of, ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (a), & (h) to discuss labor 'relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. :30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Cali 1.2. Pledge of'Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) No visitors 3. FAIR HOUSING MONTH'PROCLAMATION Mayor 4. KEYS TO THE CITY a. Recognition of Tigard Student Recipients - Oregon Congressional Award Medals for Voluntary Community Service & Personal Excellence: o Travis J. Pilcher II (Silver) . T TO o Matthew E. Hoekstra (Bronze) APRIL TABLED'. TO 1388 o Andy J. Trumbo (Bronze) b. Recognition of Citizen Volunteer Committee Member: o Patrick J. Furrer —Economic Development Committee - NOT PRESENT 5. OATH OF OFFICE PATROL OFFICER SHEILA JACKSON - Mayor administered oath 6. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 6.1 Approve City Council Minutes - 2/1/88 6.2 Receive and File: Council Meeting Calendar Update 6.3 Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports: (a) Community & Administrative -Services 2/88; (b) Community Development 1/88 & 2/88; (c) Library 2/88; and (d) Police 2/88 6.4 Accept- Baldwin Sanitary Sewer Extension - Resolution No. 98-24- 6.5 Approve NPO Appointments - Resolution No. 88- 25_ 6.6 Approve Resolution for Transfer of Appropriation for Civic Cantor. Parking Lot Expansion/Improvement Project -- Resolution No. 88.26 6.7 Approve USA Durham Treatment Plant Grounds Maint. Agree. Ros.N88 -tabled-4/25 6.8 Approve CIP Streets Project Revision 6.9 Approve Training Requests: (a) Police Executive Development Workshop for Chief of Police; and (b) National Main Street Center Training for Senior Planner Newton.' 6.10 Approve Amendment to Res y88-22 C;oncer•ning Intergovernmental Coop. Agreement Between MACC and the City Resolution No- 98- 27_ Sc/Ed - UA continued on back. 4 K , st#st 1 Z 111 111;1 gas "I f COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 28, 1988 PAGE 1 7. PUBLIC HEARING - DARTMOUTH STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1140 This Public Hearing is being held pursuant to Tigard Municipal Code 13.04.055 to consider the final plans and specifications of the local improvement district. The City Council may cure defects, or delete portions of the plans which have been 'declared void or set aside for t any reason, and may ,make necessary additions to the information contained in the preliminary engineer 's report-. o Public Hearing Opened - Continue to April 11, 1988 - Sc/Ed UA 8. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOP. 87-07 CHAPTER 18.114 SIGNS Review proposed amendments to Section18.114, Signs Ordinance o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges a Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination k' o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments u Public Hearing Closed language revision requested f o Consideration By Council: Ordinance No. 88- public hearing continued to 4/25/88 - Sc/Ed UA 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10. ADJOURNMENT : 9:01 p.m. lw/3764D * 9.1 - Murray Connection - Acting CD Director described Beaverton realignment & zoning ramifications for Tigard. Council consensus: Support. Acting CD Director to make necessary decisions on realignment '. and proposal for zoning changes. 9.2 City Administrator LOC Legislative Involvement - Council consensus: Support City Administrator's participation on Finance & Taxation Committee. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speakonan REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA - '(CATV) sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, MARCH 28, 1988, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's,agendaitemsare 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON '97223 can be `set for- a future Agenda,by-contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator, 6:30 0 STUDY SESSION & EXECUTIVE SESSION - The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under theprovisionsof ORS 192.660 (1) (d),- (e), & (h)_ to discuss labor relations,`` real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2. Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 - Call To Staff and Council, For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 3. FAIR HOUSING MONTH PROCLAMATION - Mayor 4. KEYS TO THE CITY a. Recognition of Tigard Student Recipients - Oregon Congressional Award Medals for Voluntary Community Service & Personal Excellence: o Travis J. Pilcher II (Silver) ' o Matthew. E. Hoekstra Bronze o Andy J. Trumbo (Bronze) b. Recognition of Citizen Volunteer Committee Member: o Patrick J. Furrer - Economic Development Committee 5. OATH OF OFFICE - PATROL OFFICER SHEILA JACKSON = Mayor 6. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. . Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 6.1 Approve City Council Minutes - 2/1/88 6.2 Receive and File: Council Meeting Calendar Update 6.3 Receive and File Departmental Monthly Reports: (a) Community & Administrative Services 2/88; (b) Community Development 1/88 & 2/88; (c) Library 2/88; and (d) Police 2/88 6.4 Accept- Baldwin Sanitary Sewer Extension - Resolution No. 88- 6.5 Approve NPO Appointments - Resolution No. 88- 6.6 Approve Resolution for Transfer of Appropriation for Civic Contor Parking Lot Expansion/Improvement Project -_. Resolution No. f8- 6.7 Approve USA Durham Treatment Plant Grounds Maint. Agree. Ras.#88 6.8• Approve CIP Streets Project Revision 6.9 Approve Training Requests: (a) Police Executive Development Workshop for Chief of Police; and (b) National Main Street Center, Training for Senior Planner Newton. 6.10 Approve Amendment to Res. #88-22 Concerning Intergovernnnintal Coop, Agreement Between MACC and the City - Resolution No. 88- COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 28, 1988 — PAGE_ 1 7. PUBLIC BEARING DARTMOUTH STREET_LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT N40 This Public Hearing is being held pursuant to Tigard Municipal Code 13.04.055 to considerthe final plans and specifications of the local improvement district. The City Council may cure defects, or delete portions of the plans which have been declared void or set aside for any reason, and may make necessary additions ' to the information contained in the preliminary engineor's report. o Public Hearing Opened - Continue to April 11, 1988 8. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-07 CHAPTER 18.114 SIGNS Review proposed amendments to Section 18.114, Signs Ordinance o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or• Challenges _ o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions,Or-Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council.: Ordinance No. 88- 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10. ADJOURNMENT lw/3764D ,y ;i r' IGARD CITY G`.0UN._GTL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - March 28, 1988 -- 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor- Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Jerry" Edwards, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Chuck Corrigan, Legal Counsel; Bob Jean, City Administrator'; David Lehr, Chief of Police; Jill Monley, Community Services Director; Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Deborah Stuart, Assistant: Planner; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder; and Randy Wooley; Acting Community Development Director/City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESS1103: Called to order at 6:32 PM by Councilor President Edwards. a. Consent Agenda Discussion: o Consent agenda Item .6----Approve resolution for a-transfer of appropriation , for Civic Center parking .lot expansion/improvement project. Councilor Eadon questioned this item and asked it be pulled for a voice _vote. (Note: This was riot voted on separately during Consent Agenda however, Councilor Eadon 'noted'her ,concern on this issue.) MAYOR BRIAN ARRIVED AT 6:35 PM. o Item .7--Approve USA Durham Treatment: Plant Grounds Maintenance Agreement. Councilor Edwards led discussion on whether or not this contract should be approved at this time. Council, at their April workshop, will be discussing policy issues on service contracting for other- jurisdictions. Councilor Schwartz commented that it should be kept in mind that such contracts could mean hiring additional people who become' part of the long-term employment force for the City: [le also noted that the City should decide whether or, not they just want to recover costs in a contract situation. Consensus of Council present was to table the Item .7 to the April 25, 1988 meeting. o Agenda Item 8-.-Approve CIP Streets Project Revision. Councilors Edwards and Schwartz requested clarification. Acting Community Development Director explained that the requested revision to the 87-88 Street CIP was being done in accordance with the overall Transportation Plan and for areas within the City limits. o Item ,9--Training Request for• National Main Street Center—Senior Planner Newton. There was discussion on the account number allocation submitted. City Administrator advised that this training had been budgeted as a specific dine item under this account number. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 28, 1.988 k , B b, Agenda Item No. 8--_.Sign Code. Mayor Brian suggested it be s clarified eluting the public _hearing that this was not a new sign € code. Action'being suggested contains revisions to the existing :.sign code and it would not be appropriate for: individual sign k review at this meeting. City Administrator noted that the proposed amendments actually eases some of the requirements of the present code. 1 - 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council L-jent into Executive x Session at 6:52 PM under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN AND ASSISTANT PLANNER STUART ARRIVED: 7:04 PM t STUDY SESSION RECONVENED: 7:13 PM a. King City — Police Contract. There was discussion on the request before Council concerning police service contracting. Council consensus was to postpone making a decision until after the April workshop. The ling City Police Service Contracting issue would be discussed at the April 25 meeting. Council consensus was to send a letter, from the Mayor, to the Y King City Council, advising them of the Council's decision to table any action until April 25, 1988, Also discussed was the upcoming Durham police services contract. No action will be considered ;by Council until after the April workshop, b. There was discussion on the Budget Committee meeting scheduled for -5:30 pm. on March 29, 1988. Council consensus was to 'reschedule .to 7:00 p.m. due to scheduling conflicts for several members of the Budget Committee. Community Services Director will contact the Budget Committee Chairperson. r 5• VISITOR'S AGENDA: No one signed in. 6. FAIR—HOUSING MONTH PROCLAMATION a. The proclamation was read by the Deputy Recorder. A copy of the proclamation can be found in the Council meeting file, 7. KEYS TO THE CITY a. Recognition of Tigard student recipients for• the Oregon Congressional award medals for voluntary community service and personal excellence — Tabled to April 11, 1988. b. Recognition of citizen volunteer committee member, Patrick J. Furr•er, Economic Development Committee. Mr. Fur•r•er• was riot present; Mayor requested staff to forward the certificate to Mr. { Fu r•re r•. i Page 2 — COUNCIL. MINUTES — March 28, 1900 1 8. OATH OF OFFICE a. Mayor• administered oath of office to Patrol Officer Sheila A' Jackson. Mayor and Council extended congratulations to Patrol Officer Jackson. Mayor commented that Ms. Jackson was a veteran of the US Army-served in the military police. lie also rioted that in addition to other• skills, Ms. Jackson speaks French, Korean, and Spanish fluently: 9. CONSENT AGENDA: a. Mayor Brian noted ,that item .'7 was tabled to April 25, 1988. b. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Edwards to: .1 Approve City Council minutes - 2/1/88. .2 Receive and Filer Councilor meeting calendar• update' .3 Receive and t=ile Departmental Monthly Reports: a) Community and Administrative Services, 2/88; b) Community Development, 1/88 and 2/88; c) Library 2/88; and, d) Police, 2/88. .4 Accept: Baldwin Sanitary Sewer extension - Resolution No. 88-24: .5 Approve NPO appointments - Resolution No. 88-25. .6 Approve resolution for Transfer of Appropriation for• Civic Center Parking Lot Ex pans ioii/Improvement Project - Resolution No. 88-26. .7 Approve USA Durham Treatment Plant Grounds Maintenance ' Agreement - tabled to:the April 25, 1988 meeting. 8 Approve CIP Streets Project Revision. .9 Approve Training'Requests: a. Police Executive Development Workshop for Chief of Police; and b. National Main Street Center Training for Senior Planner Newton. .10 Approve amendment to Resolution No. 88--22 concerning Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement between MACC and the City - Resolution No. 88-27. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. C. Acting Community Development Director explained Item .8 as to the scope of work proposed. In February, the Council and Transportation Advisory Committee discussed two new ` transportation planning projects. Staff suggested that Council approve revisions to the 1987/88 streets CIP by addition of a Northeast Bull Mountain Study ($20,000) and a City Center Access Study ($40,000). The Northeast. Bull Mountain Study was intended to identify the alignments of collector roadways to connect Walnut Street, Bull Mountain Road, and Gaarde Street. This work is urgently needed to assure creation of the necessary road system as the area develops. The proposed ' study budget is $20,000. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 28, 1988 A Muni Acting Community Development Director further explained that the City Center Access study is proposed to complement planning work of the City Center Plan Task Force. The project will evaluate ,.. engineering alternatives for major access between the 'Cascade Boulevard/WashingtonSquare area and the Main Street area. It would also look at traffic circulation in the City Center area. The proposed budget is $40,000, It was proposed that the two Transportation Planning Study Projects be added to the Street CIP list, using a portion of the funding available from previous deletion of the Tiedeman project. 10. PUBLIC HEARING- DARTMOUTH STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #40 a Public Hearing opened. b. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to continue the hearing to April 11, 1988. There was a sign-up sheet for testimony; however, there were no names listed on the sign--up sheet. There will be an opportunity for public testimony on April 11, 1988. The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 11i PUBLIC BOOM — ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA-87-07, CHAPTER 18.114 SIGNS. a. Public Hearing opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. C. Summation by Senior Planner Liden. Council had received in their packet the eighth draft of revisions to Chapter 18.114 of, the Code which regulates signs. The Planning Commission had met five times to discuss the Sign Code and the City Attor'ney's office had been consulted throughout. The changes included new and improved definitions; provisions to allow one balloon per owner or legal occupant per year; insertion of sign permit requirements; revised standards and consistent wording for the C—P and C--N zoning districts; new Administrative Exception criteria for new proposed signs and existing nonconforming signs; changes (mostly deletions) to make the Code "content-•neutral" consistent with recent court cases; standards for freeway—oriented signs; provisions to allow two freestanding signs on corner lots by administrative review and on interior lots by Sign Code Exception approval; and corrections for inconsistencies between the Community Development Code and the Tigard Municipal Code. Included in the Council packet were the minutes, memos to the Commission, and exhibits submitted by the public for the December 15, 1987, January 19, February 23, March 8, and March 15, 1988, Planning Commission Hearings, proposed revisions (Draft 08, Exhibit "A"), and a proposed ordinance for adoption, Page 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES— March 28, 1988 u FAW MAN Senior Planner Liden reviewed Deborah Stuart's memorandum of March_ 21,, '1.988. This memorandum highlighted the changes° the Planning Commission approved and recommended to ,the City Council for adoption. Senior- Planner Liden rioted that in no case are the proposed sign standards more restrictive for permanent "signs than the present Code. He further advised that the Planning Commission recommended the City review the Sign Code in one year to determine how it was working 1 Senior Planner Liden reviewed additional areas which, after study by the City Attorney, were recommended for change. Major changes = were: i Top of Page 20--..-(4) (freeway-oriented signs)--.-use k following wording: Any properties which are riot abutting but which will be located within a 1,000 feet of the Interstate Highway 5 1 and Highway 217 rights--of-way and where the sign is primarily intended to be seen from Interstate Highway 5 and Highway 217 shall be allowed a freeway--oriented sign through the Sign Code Exception process. Pa;e 40, (7)---substitute the following wording: A proposed exception for a freeway--oriented sign on a property located within 1,000:feet of the Interstate 5 and Highway 217 _rights-oF-•way may be granted if: (1) the proposed sign(s) meets- the dimensional and i locational criteria given in Section 18;114.090(e); and (2) the sign is primarily intended to be seen from Interstate Highway 5 or Highway 217. i Page 24--48.114.129 (d)---should read as follows (the proposed new wording is underlined): r Any person who owns or leases a sign structure shall { remove such sign structure after the expiration of the amortizationen riod for the sic�n(s) as provided in Section 18.114.110. d, Mayor advised that the present sign ordinance had been in place for a number- of years and the ordinance now before Council reflects amendments to that ordinance. Mayor added that this would not be the time for individual sign cases to be discussed. Discussion should be limited to general terms as the sign code would be applied City—wide. Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES — March 28, 1988 A d. Public Testimony QP-P-L—)nent o Wilbur Rasmussen, Rasmussen Chevron in Tigard, was present ' with Phil McCurdy, Architect, 8040 NE Sandy Blvd. Mr. McCurdy referenced the Oregon Revised Statute$ and Oreq n" Administrative Rules which pertain to fuel— pricing and disclosure laws. lie rioted that pricing must be visible to not only the customer but also the potential customer. Ne advised that service 'station pricing is very important to service stations in this highly competitive market. Mr. McCurdy advised that his concerns were with the two freestanding signs as allowed in the sign code ordinance. Most fuel pricing signs, were low to allow visibility to both people purchasing the fuel as well as the potential customer- driving_ by. Gas station owners want the logo sign to be fairly tall for a brand"recognition. Senior Planner Liden noted this situationhadbeen discussed by the planning Commission wherein some businesses want two freestanding signs The proposed changes to the ordinance- would allow the two freestanding signs with the allowable square footage to be_divided between ;them. Some extra square footage_would be possible via the Sign Code Exception process. There was discussion between the Council and Senior Planner t_iden on the Sign Code Exception process and how it would apply to service stations Senior, Planner Liden noted that most servicestations were in a 'nonconforming situation and the City would riot charge a fee for, the Sign Code Exception process for existing nonconforming signs. o Gerald Kolve testified on behalf of the tenants of Canterbury Square Shopping Center. He noted their present sign would be just outside the square footage requirement—­-even with the 25 percent allowance in the Sign Code Exception criteria. Mr . Kolve asked Council to allow this Shopping Center a sign at least as large as the signs allowable in the freeway sign zone area. Mayor commented that Council and staff wished to distinguish between Highway 99W and the businesses located along 1. 5 and 217 as needing different kinds of signs. Senior Planner, Liden explained that, if, through the Sign Code Exception process, a business's sign still did not meet Code requirements, the variance process would still be available to them. i i i Page 6 COUNCIL. MINUTES — March 28, 1988 r i oiiii,A il There was discussion between Council and staff as to whether or not the 25 percent allowed sufficient discretion in the Sign Code Exception ;process; Senior Planner Liden advised that he was comfortable with the process as now set forth in the Sign Code. o Richard Fuson, 175 NE Columbia, Portland. Mr. Fuson asked if the amendments to the Code included a formula for calculating sign " square footage based on the linear footage of the business along the street. Senior Planner- Liden advised that there was no formula. Any business, regardless of the amount of linear feet on a highway, would be required to have the same sign. e. Senior Planner Liden recommended the approval of the ordinance and exhibits before Council with the changes noted. f. Council questions and comments. There was lengthy discussion on certain elements of the proposed amendments. Also discussed' was the nearing deadline _ for conformance by all businesses to the Sign Code. City Administrator summarized discussion conclusions; When a sign conforms toallcriteria set forth in the sign code, an outright Sign Permit, is granted. —When a sign is larger than allowed (up to 25% larger'), an individual: business could be .granted a larger sign through' the Sign Code Exception process. -When a hardship situation exists, (or a situation consistent with Variance criteria), an individual business could be granted a sign larger than the 25% limitation through the Variance process. Both new signs and existing sign requests could utilize this process; however, new signs may have a more difficult time proving hardship. Mayor expressed concern that freeway signs would be allowed within 1,000 feet of the freeway rights—of--way (1--5 and 217). After lengthy discussion, Council consensus was to remove any reference to footage from the proposed amendments to the ordinance. Requested freeway signs should be based on their merit- and whether or not they abut the freeway. Mayor recapped the discussion; - The freeway sign zone section should be rewritten as described above The Sign Code Exception process and Variance process should be adequate when addressing problems of existing signs which are outside the size requirements of the Sign Code. City Administrator Hated the need to reviewthe existing and proposed language to assure this could be implemented as desired by Council. Mayor rioted that this would ,be appreciated; he added variances in some instances are very difficult to obtain because of the strict guidelines. Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 28, 1988 f With regard to the issue of the second sign (freestanding signs) and requirements of State Law, Senior Planner Liden ' L advised: Under the new provisions intheSign Code, business owners would be allowed to have two freestanding signs through the :Sian Code Exception process. How the business owners decide to divide up the square footage between the two signs would be at theirdiscretion. h. Motion by-Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor, Edwards to continue the, public hearing to April 25, -1986, to allow staff time to make revisions as discussed at this public hearing. The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCILOR EDWARDS LEFT THE MEETING AT 8:50 PM. li NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Murray connection — Acting Community Development Director described the Beaverton realignment for the Murray Road and how it would affect the connections to Tigard's 'plan. He also noted that if Tigard should also realign to connect with Beaver-ton's realignment, there would be some zoning ramifications to be considered. After discussion, it was Council consensus to support the Acting Community Development Director in;making the necessary decisions on the realignment and to develop a proposal for necessary' zoning changes. b. City Administrator advised Council he had been asked to become involved with the League of Oregon Cities on a committee. After discussion, Council consensus was to support the City Administrator's participation on the League of Oregon Cities Finance and Taxation Committee, 12. ADJOURNMENT 9:01 PM. JC/S-9 Approved by the Tigard City Council on 1988• Deputy Recorder-City of Tig ATTEST: Mayor City of Tigard cs/4162D Page 8 — COUNCIL MINUTES - March 28, 1988 t Lt n TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal`'7�1c��9� P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360` @i Not BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising .f MAN f I ❑ Tearsheet Notice 9 1988 0 ❑ C/7 Duplicate Affidavit ,, 02ARD { AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTO )ss. I, 1 )ME being first duly sworn,depose and s that�I m hQ_Mvertismg Director,or his principal clerk,of the a newspaper of general circulation as d ed in ORS '193.010 and 193.020;`published t in the aforeimd1� Oat and t e- htatbt a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and i consecutive in the following issues: h } Subscribed Sn--d-sw—Boirn,o before met is + +� otary Public for Oregon my Commission Expire sq + x>& AFFIDAVIT � The 8o!lowl�}g -a€��r+'�te .�t�tpalbIlsheo�^5 �su,�fnt'clrgr�#to��� ESat It er tnforniatj aad ff►It!age ad sMnj,be ot: Wa pro ffi l' der,13125�y�'y./�ths13�Ttva x���$e*goti '27/3Y�axt{ : a �CyatlQiy�{� tt � g I71dr�S„Uylyagt�[Y/�SYIIpW�+�y� �.1'�, 43E25 S ► atlU�svti), Ito q ; ' N' 6 qty � err NV”, � t r 4 t' '.Sibsl .117tn�t �V�.'1 ©�Y� 4"zi y ,� "t �aaau►6t i� +'�Z f'" r �`i 1 �' �"� ,ct2 .:�,s,�"�� �� 'Pub -e y e eta �}�y}��"�Ss�',+� ,.+y�ySsvag#+'��5��a'ti,R Yti j ! p•x�f Ci t) t%V 5 ' GY •^�•p'C H tl�.<S7' ��a�mem+ A..•, Cy � At roU . � us a°i ro°a.aio'al r� Lu 4)00 u'Q y o,as8rA c�oArov ay'a0,a)S ro ue° Wssa w ati. +n V ;oo ea Tda o x zw:; a� w � rvwoc� a Via"•, :: momv wrodai' Ar4a?oa � + o ami mow:' Ap ,Av� O can d URI ° � 6L � •= ys Ci E+ wo ° 43 Upq °�v, nogr�'d Gam ' °U� v~, �6 �W-,;a m W p .®z M)io � G PU R� p z B 02 l Ot ii C o 7 _ tl1 Oa t 0 a O N Q A O U z t) 0 0 ® c o. h N!6 O z - a �! C co > O co3 ro o w t0 Q ro v40, m r w CD co ro c ap W a D w e ro N N Op � ° I. IL y ccuo�� 0 w ( w 1 6- O .,.� tux=1 y C o `) z a m i ;� s m C) M Q nN m ro 5 N �h) Q 'C ro ro't9°'� L S O N CL 91 N U d /� Q �� pCmNC L C '0 O tl QC)< N tl�� A p ro g N W OIL oL o O e e ~ 5 LL O - ' 000 -10 CLC, to 7 ? FT- .:. 00)CD m N U V.. Q ®C . i. tar p a r an e ® ® COO a® to ro ro 0 o 0 TI ES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ❑ Tearsheet Notice 0 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF yWASHIN )ss. being first duly sworn, depose and ay the I amt Advertising Director,or his principal cleric,of the � a newspaper of general circularti-on�sd in ORS 193.010 and 193.020;published at in the afo�ss��y a�an ate;that the ' '„ arAMA, Q a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for l `successive and consecutive in the following issues: ADw' 307, owfc Subscribe Znd swor-n—m,,before me this A61 '--q " N ry Public for Oregon My Commission Expires-ao -g 0 AFFIDAVIT R or 'I" � - + The goilowln�wilt be,consideren by the ttigard City Coaintt oa Nsdactt 2B._t8,$S,at?'30 )yi at Yga�d i,, tent r,f'o ItaIIE 33ivd 'ii igand,�3rein t�rrtlter lnfors on nav,be a�bta3uedrotn kae Cotninuot#y Development T}at`et$ot`ar City�o �t g#than ate toe�st3o�i a�` �' b Caping OWL You,are 14'f 4t to submit #tern#�tl Sn+y fit sdv�tm �� of fMa pt�btta tsearing varittealsnd'dral testfMona vflil l�C.s Ii$dteat '�F t ttr ring e-pubtic hesrl wIl[`1tg CdrzMIA 3h aA¢ rdafaGe r{I. a`� applfcELf�te Gaepoa P8,�0 of trie,. # rdtclpal t* - zproced adapted by the EAUnCit aiza# ' I e t it , r t ,' lt7d`ya� 'V YtA`l �15y1+77(8511�iyL,,f,A��-l+(F(.�a'1 0A!$7' MEE=` 1- AGENDA ITEM 2 — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE 3/2 8/8 8 (limited to 2 minutes or less, Please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council ear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you wishes to hns through staff.resolve your concerPlease contact the City first try a Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED f j I • d "�& t try v.�i to c M r T 4�• r7 %r f F • `I n r t1.5 I 1 � 4 +S F ��• f n � y I PP 4� 1 11" 1 1 1 1 11� '1/ 1 • 1. d f Y i� §.,. M1 S yla 1 H OZ._� tfi N�M t•; 4 Tt rpt x n; YAP' xl � tai r� rw�r7,3x fr x aatt�r i 4 •`•y�� n"�r. -1 � >`LA r,It 5 �. �t 'S. �. r, ,t r r } �` �` s i�SL�a:"k.'rr3st 37A)�+�'q� µ �-r rFyrr �- �.t J ._I- y.��` v"•'`u'�� /`I�a'^i4;xcr �.,S+x�`�yx`i E y 1'�z, %: { t��kyc • � ,: �. T .r s � t t' � i y:.*,r i I k3£ }dS.Vw € ;'F y s �' .;� r";s F* � k '� �z� ��vi.0 s t r 'x� <�.,5r x• � t 6 k, � � a h .{f 2-_ iii § rt - J �{,1 a� �t'�L���f y.-.',.e, r�`, ��� . .�, �7 t -.w.'i4, ;�I�ksr t'i�ty. d A, {R.'� '� s #�f ��•..�?�1:��'st�+��{�}U�t �'�t� � 1 .,, =a..a. .,ft....... .�.ca., ..}. ...x ._ v....r .:-. ...., ::_.....�:,- f_.... _ . .,:,✓s,r...,..:W._Y...t,t.s.:� s.,+...a.,C. X ,,.,,. �.:..ra ,. .... DATE 3/28/88 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the fallowing item: (Please print the information) Item Description,: AGENDA ITEM! NO. $ ZONE ORDINANCE'AMENDMENT ZOA. 87-07 �. CHAPTER 18.114 SIGNS — ,PUBLIC HEARING Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue), ame, filiation Name, Address and Affiliation ZAP `-vim r M-f ,42�i r LK C� deer r14 As-vl- i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T TO: Honorable Mayor, ncil a City iinistrator March 22, 1988 &51 FROM: Chief- of Police SUBJECT: police Service Contracting At the March 14, 1988, Council meeting you received a memo from me regarding a request from King City fur~ a cost analysis of the provision of police services by the Tigard Police Department to King City. As a result of discussion, Council consensus was that it wished to review the City's policy on providing service "contractually, and that Mayor Brian communicate with King ' City requesting a direct communication from the King City ,Council to the Tigard Council specifying more particularly their request. Mayor Brian sent a letter to King City and has received from King City, a letter in 'response and an information sheet on cost of services from the Sheriff's Department. The letter indicates that the King City Ad Hoc Security Committee will meet March 29, hoping to know what you have decided regarding their request. It would be appropriate for Council to discuss this issue during .the workshop session March 28, _1988. ' Time will be available as the Dartmouth Public Hearing has been continued to April 11, 1988. ht/3848D Ems City of hing Citi March 20, 1988 Mayor Tom Brian fZsz City of Tigard P.O. Box23397 Tigard, ,OR 97223 Dear Tom: Thank you for your Council's response to the dual requests from myself and Mayor Jean Young in re: the possibility of a police protection contract for King City with Tigard. First, let me `update you We have named Dennis McClain Senior Officer and hired a second officer, whom we have used before, on an hourly basis so that we may maintain our usual level of pro- tection. Tuesday I am going to propose to our Council in a spe- cial meeting that we maintain this situation to the end of June. Or This will give us time to assess McClain (and he us) and will give us "elbow room" to decide what we shall do in the next fiscal_year. I believe the Council will agree. Sheriff Probtsfield came to the Ad Hoc Security Committee meet- ing last week and left the attached proposal for 'a seven-day-a- week, one shift agreement. To simplify, and compare apples with apples, could you provide a figure on the same basis ? The per- tinent figures appear on the second page, commencing with the FY-88 through FY-89. The ad hoc committee meets again March 29, which will give us a chance to know what your Council decided. Does this seem reasonable to you (639-1542) ? Sincerely, Vernor M. Schenck Police Commissioner (503) 620-6444 City of King City ® 15300 S.W. 116th Avenue, King City, Oregon 97224 ® w ea f ICING CITY and POLICE PROTECTION ------------------------- DEMOGRAPHICS & TAXES ------------------------------ Current Population: 2,015 Assessed Value--FY-86: $80,070,769 Assessed Value--FY-87: $84,450,935 Assessed Value--FY-88: $81,682,540 Est. Assessed Value--FY-89: $83,316,191 Total Current Tax Rate: $21.51 Current City Tax Rate: $1.57 Total City; Property Tax: $128,242 Per Capita City Tax: $63.64 LAST CONTRACT WITH SHERIFF ------------------------------ Date Expired: June 30, 1966 Service Level--Coverage; Seven eight-hour shifts per week Service Level--Hours: 2,912 Hours per Year Total Cost: $67,000 for FY 85-86 . Rate: $23.01 per hour Tax Rate Required: $0.8367/$1,000 A.V. CITY POLICE FORCE ------------------------------ Start-up Begins: April 1, 1986 Preliminary Start-up Costs - April 1st - June 30th, 1986: Estimated at $15,655 Final Payment to Sheriff - April 1st - June 30th 1986: $16,750 FY 1986-87 Costs: Estimated at $93,849 Tax Rate Required: $1.11/$1,000 A.V. Total Protection Costs - April 1, 1986 - June 30, 1987: Estimated at $126,254 Tax Rate Required: $1.49/$1,000 A.V. Cost per Capita: Estimated at $62.66 IMPACT OF COUNTY AUDITOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON POLICE CONTRACTS AFTER FY-86 ------------------------------ Assume -- - ----- --- -- Assume same service level: 2,912 Hours/Year KING CITY CONTRACTING (Cont'd) FY-87 Rate Per Hour: $35.58 FY-87 Total Cost: $103.609 Tax Rate Required: $1 .23/$1,000 A.V. FY-87 Cost per Capita: $51.42 FY-88 Rate Per Hour: $48.15 FY-88 Total Cost: Tax Rate Required: $1 .72/$1,000 A.V. FY-88 Cost Per Capita: $69.59 F VERY TENTATIVE ESTIMATE [ of FY-1989 CONTRACT COSTS # - --- ---- --------------- --Assume Same Service Level: 2,912 :Hours/Per Year FY-89 Estimated Rate Per Hour: $49,57 FY-89 Estimated Total Cost: $144,342 Required Tax Rate: $1 .73/$1,000 A.V. FY--89 Cost Per Capita: $71.63 HOW MUCH POLICE SERVICE WOULD A TAX RATE OF ,$0.85/$1,000 BUY (ESPD Rate) _ - -- ---------- Total Property Taxes Raised: $70,819 Estimated FY-89 Rate/Hour: $49.57' Hours of Service Per Year: 1,429 Hours of Service Per Week: 27.47 Coverage: 3.43 8-Hour Shifts Per Week (About Half the Coverage Purchased from the Sheriff in FY-1986). i ii IN L CITY OF TWA RD OREGON March 16, 1988 Mr. Vernor M. Schenck Police Commissioner, City of King City 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City, OR 97224 /may,w" Dear Commission chenk: The Tigard City Council has received from Chief Lehr your letter regarding Ring City's request for an analysis of costs for the provision of police services to King City by the Tigard Police Department. After preliminary discussion the Council requested that I communicate with you regarding your request. Prior to directing staff to do a cost analysis, the Council wishes to review its own policy regardingproviding contractual services to other �. jurisdictions. We are also requesting that your Council provide to us, in writing, a more detailed request, so that our staff might more effectively provide you with an analysis of costs. „; Council, therefore, has tabled considering your request until it has had an opportunity to discuss the _above issue with the full Council present and receives further clarification from your Council. That discussion should occur at the March 28, "1988, Tigard Council meeting. The Tigard Council understands that the King City Police Department is operating shorthanded due to a resigation and that your Department is operating on an interim basis pending the replacement of the officer. We will continue to respond to emergency calls in King City as per our contract provisions. The Council wishes to assure you that the Tigard Police Department stands willing to provide you with whatever assistance you might require upon request. Sincerely, Tom Brian Mayor ke/3743D 13125 SW Hall Blvd.;RO.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)1639-4171 t City ®f King City March 16', 1988 Mayor Tom Brian City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Street Tigard, OR 97223 -0y` Dear Mgyar-'Brian: Recently I appointed an ad hoc committee to look at King City security. This committee includes three residents, the President of the City Council and one councilor. The committee has asked if it may obtain approximate figures of what it would cost, if Tigard Police Department contracted to patrol King City. The first question is, would you even consider it ? If you would consider it, what might an annual cost run for (1) one shift a day, (2) two shifts a day or (3) the addition of the patrol territory as"a supplement to Summerfield schedules ? I realize this is an imposition on your time and that of your people and I apologize for it. But what the committee is looking for is a basis to compare King City actual costs with "what if" costs. Sincerely, GcZ ht, J an K. Young ,Mayor 144 A City of icing City ® 15300 SM. 116th Avenue, King City, Oregon 97224® (503) 620-6444� City ®f Bing City March 16, 1958 Mayor Tom Brian City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ma, r i an: Recently I appointed an ad hoc committee to look at King City security. This committee includes three residents, the President oftheCity Council and one councilor. The committee has asked if it may obtain approximate figures of what it would cost, if Tigard Police Department contracted to patrol King City. The first question is, would you even consider it ? If you would consider it what might an annual cost run for (1) one shift a-day, (2) two shifts a day or (3)' the addition of the patrol territory as -a supplement to Summerfield schedules ? _- I realize this is an imposition on your time and that ofyour people and I apologize for it. But what the committee is looking for is a basis to compare King City actual costs with "what if" costs. Sincerely, �A�bU �Jan K. Young ayor C City of King City 15300 S.W. 116th Avenue, King City, Oregon 97224 ®(503) 620-6444 � i KING CITY and POLICE PROTECTION --------------- DEMOGRAPHICS - --- -DEMOGRAPHICS & TAXES ------------------------------ Current Population: 2,015 Assessed Value--FY-86: $80,070,769 Assessed Value--FY-87: $84,450,935 Assessed Value--FY-88: $81,682 ,540 Est. Assessed Value--FY-89: $83,316,191 Total Current Tax Rate: $21.51 Current City Tax Rate: $1.57 Total City Property Tax: $128,242 Per Capita City Tax: $63.64 LAST CONTRACT WITH SHERIFF Date Expired: June 30, 1986 Service Level--Coverage: Seven eight-hour shifts per week' Service Level--Hours: 2,912 Hours per Year Total Cost: $67,000 for FY 85-86 Rate: $23.01 per hour Tax Rate Required: $0.8367/$1,000 A.V. CITY POLICE FORCE ------------------------------ Start-up Begins: April 1, 1986 Preliminary Start-up Costs - April 1st —June 30th, 1986: Estimated at $15,655 Final Payment to Sheriff - f April 1st - June 30th 1986: $16,750 FY 1986-87 Costs: Estimated at $93,849 Tax Rate Required: $1 . 11/$1,000 A.V. Total Protection Costs - April 1, 1986 - June 30, 1987: Estimated at $126,254 Tax Rate Required: $1 .49/$1,000 A.V. Cost per Capita: Estimated at $62.66 IMPACT OF COUNTY AUDITOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON POLICE CONTRACTS AFTER FY-86 .------_--------- .__ Assume same service level: 2,912 Hours/Year KING CITY CONTRACTING (Cont'd) $35.58:. FY-87 Rate Per Hour: $103,609 FY-87 Total Cost: $1.23/$1,000 A.V. Tax Rate Required: $51.42' FY-87 Cost per Capita: $48.1b FY-88 Rate Per Hour: $140,213 FY-88 Total Cost: $1.72/$1,000 A.V. Tax Rate Required: $69.59 FY-88' Cost ,Per Capita: VERY TENTATIVE ESTIMATE of FY-1989 CONTRACT^COSTS _--- --------------- --vice Level: 2,912 Hours/Per Year Assume Same Ser $49.5T FY-89 Estimated Rate Per Hour: $144,342 FY-89 Estimated Total Cost: $1`.73/$1,000 A.V. Required Tax Rate: $71.63 FY-09 Cost Per Capita: How MUCH POLICE SERVICE WOULD A TAX RATE OF $0.85/$1,000 BUY (ESPD Rate) _-- $70,819 Total Property Taxes Raised: $49.57•• Estimated FY-89 Rate/Hour: 1,429 Hours of Service Per Year: 27.47 Hours of Service Per Week: 3.43 8-Hour Shifts Coverage: Per Week (About Half the Coverage Purchased from the Sheriff in FY-1986) . � . q, fnoun vor ressional Award Council March 9, 1988 HONORARY CHAIRMEN The Honorable Tom 1ki an Mark United Slateld s Mayor of Tigard. United States Senator Bob Packwood `P.O. .Box 23397 United States Seantor '.Tigard,. Oregon 97223. Las AuCoin United States Representative Bobsm'.th Dear Mayor Brian: United States Representative Ron Wyden United States Reproaentative On behalf of the Oregon .Congressional Award Council, Pe1af DeFazlo S United States Representative I am honored to inform you that students from your Denny Smith -city have been approved to receive Congressional United States Representative Award medals for voluntary community service and EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE personal excellence. Joan Moore,Chairman DamickDuahren Their willingness to give of themselves to voluntarily J.Kelley Moore Casey Woodard help .others andtheircommunities and achievements in ADMINISTRATIVE ASST. personal development and physical fitness are admirable. The initiative, achievement,and Suzann°Hlldlck excellence they have demonstrated in voluntary COUNCIL MEMBERS service is an inspiration to all involved with :.LmnardAnderson the Congressional Award. Barbara Banda Floyd Banned W"Yaeeiekar The 1988 group,of Congressional Award recipients Nancy Batted will be recognized with the presentation of medals Sua Busby JeanetteMamard and certificates of achievement by a Member of. Royal"Buzz"Collins the U.S. Congress on .Saturday,. April 9th,. at 3:30p.m. TIM fBetty�ks in the House Chamber of the State Capitol. I hope � Delz ®oewey°` you will be able to join us for this special Sue Dewily occasion. Becky Flowers Jane Fraoso Larkin Franks Dick Ginsburg My congratulations to you and your city for the anHenn¢man Mike Her({a special recognition awarded to these fine young Mike Lane Hannon. people. Peggy Hart N2ACY Hildick Lynette Houghton incerely, Paggy Hoyt 6 Nancy Huppedz Brenda Imeson - RayJohnson Linda Johnson Charles Kimbol,Sr. Bill Knox. .— Nancy Lewis Site Loveland Joan Moore Dr.Maria Made Richard(Dick(Miller. Council Chair Rudy Miner JM:Sh Frank Nelson Lynn M.Nelson Alex Paul Cheryl Perrin Althea Prattd3roome- Belty Schedeen Mitzi Scott 'horm ron Seldean .arbara Selby Carol Sep{ch Marian Smith we Smith Tom Stearns _ Ray Steinleld,Jr. Joanne Stern Sleve.sWera Jack Trachsel �� ` �• —�(��`r'`�-� Dorls Wadsworth (/ Me!Waggoner P.O.Box 40005,Portland,Oregon 97240 Dals Whitney An Oregon Nonprofit Corporation ���/ -- 1988 Congressional_ Award Redipients GOLD: Shelly Jean 'Cook Brian E. Smith 8080 S.E. Otty,Street 30873 Bellfountain Road Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Corvallis, Oregon 97333 SILVER: Clarence C. Cook, Jr: Anthony J. Corona 8080 S.E. Otty Street 3209 N.E. 7th milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Portland, Oregon 97212' Lisa M. Crockett Amin K. Kamadoli 3032 Morris Place 3828 Ivy Way N.E. .Reedsport, Oregon 97467 Salem, Oregon 97305 Joseph C. Livengood Scott B. Nelson 4850 Fir Place N.W. 1890 Hawthorne Drive Albany, Oregon - 97321 Reedsport, Oregon 97467 Tiare M. Gehrman William D. Norfleet 72 Eulalona Court -15170 Guthrie Road Klamath Falls, Oregon .97601 Dallas, Oregon. 97338 . Travis G. Pilcher II Tricia A. Rosson 7915 S.W. Fanno Creek-Dr., ' #2 3325 N.W. Parkview Dr. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Beaverton, Oregon 97006 Bradley D. Stevens Theodore J. Thoren 31$5 Maple Drive 124 Tioga Place Reedsport, Oregon 97467 North Bend, Oregon 97459 BRONZE: Joseph A. Ashton Matthew D. Beasley 3075 N.W. Cornell Road 17443 S.E. Boardman Ct. Portland, Oregon 97210 Milwaukee, Oregon 97267 James J. Claus Wesley C. Cook Route 3, Box 169 8080 S.E. Otty Street Sherwood, Oregon 97140 Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Kevin M. Duncan Mark & Godfrey 8915 S.W. Arapaho Road 14415 S.W. Yearling Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Matthew E. Hoekstra John F. Knieling 13880 S.W. River Lane 3791 Wiltsey S.E. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Salem, Oregon 97301 Todd G. Nelson Andy J Trumbo 1045 South 8th 14365 S.W. '144th Avenue . Coos Bay, Oregon 97420 Tigard ' Oregon 97224'' loiJlsIO Isuolssej ouoo PYISIO IDOWS suogd ewoH epo6 dig 9 1410 WAS ewSN •pjvmV leuopoiSuoo 941]o►uopeolldde ue ow puss esesld Cb :S"0 0.=.0 c3: ZEE E N;2,2 C E 5E 'o m a a m� w L `4 >(4pppc!J g a m �� a E g O C13 . •- E? C 09 C ?g a g Ix I ID �ai wO mEE P� m m cC�m �E O �c am m >_9 aE¢ TiE nm � 3E y °® J I- I �5 cgs —_� a bg a �' am $ L, 0=9 a 5g E n$ V06 yA Evm m 3° p^gym � y` a � a � Fo F40 a NS t a c gQrn ° 0 >a 0 C SCO.=.. OU 0U E E mma E C > oao _ c 0000'2000 888 ¢ 888 s > t=�5� _ °c W •Cn. 9CC(p . � Nm om. .09 9IDYc •0 'or 9"Cm 4g �t.8 ° gym$m mt0 . cn XiXo® q0c i y$= J g �°EE'o 3_ �3 $ �E o 1 �� �pp(D IE E O m rt ZS SIS S2? y m @m u$ m Na 8�m •uom E � �m 5 m E e y10�u,�E @` E wN m, � �E CL-0ESE 2.2 C BC CC aRs�� arc v mW ;mg �a omao ��a J awacia ��o 3m�0C c$r t aOE'S toll m CID Y c c m E $ gv' Z4c E m 3 cda o W � C7 � L � � �$•c SEE � .��m$ � �� EC g+ $ 1010 i: r OREGON CONGRESSIONAL AWARD COUNCIL P.O.Box 7427 A10112,Oregon 97007.0027 HaC SS qC EE tie �j® y �1Z;lA E.9 mz HUM a •o yr S � _ � a� � � � h°oL' wu�i ° »oma Sw n. E$ OREGON CONGRESSIONAL AWARD COUNCIL P.O.BOX 7027 ALOHA,OREGON M07-0027 ATfN:Awa►d-CQmmi4too i , OEM t OREGONCITYOFTIFA March 16, 1988 E i Mr. Matthew E. Hoekstra 13880,S.W. River-Lane ' Tigard, OR 97224 I' I Dear Matthew: l F On behalf of the City Council and citizens of r the lions f Tigard, I am honored to offer to you our ' Bang 4 participation in the Congressional Award program. , Your achieve- ersonal_development and physical fitness are admirable, ments in p achievement and excellence '' you have kk the initiative, our community I o and s demonstrated in voluntary service to others and t y is an inspiration to all. I regret I will not be able to attend the presentation ceremony on but would like to extend to you an invitation to attend April 9, April 11 so that each member of Council can ;. our Council .Meeting:of Ap • personally offer their congratulations. • . Once again, our best personal wishes to you. You are a credit to your community. Sincerely, Tom Brian Mayor TB:mh 13925 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.B®x 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171- l RINMIMMMM MINE 111111111 -jaa­ 4 CITYOFTISAr OREGON March 16, 1988 ' ; 1 Mr. Travis G.,_Pilcher II 7915 S.W. Fanno Creek Drive, #2 Tigard, OR 97225 1 1 Dear Travis: On behalf •o£ the Cit}; Council and citizens of the City of Tigard, I am honored to offer to you our congratulations for your part icipation;in the Congressional Award program. Your achieve- ments in personal development and physical fitness are admirable, and the initiative, achievement and excellence you have demonstrated in voluntary service to others and to your community e is an inspiration to all. I'regret I will not be able to attend the presentation ceremony on April '9, but would like to extend to you an invitation to attend our Council Meeting of-April 11 so that each member of Council can personally offer their congratulations. once again, our best personal wishes to you. You are a credit to your community. Sincerely, Tom Brian Mayor TB:mh i 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,RO.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-c1171— 1 OREGON March 16, '1988 Mr. Andy J. Trumbo 14365`S.W. 144th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Andy: On behalf of the-City Council and citizens of the City ;of Tigard, I am honored to offer to you our congratulations for your participation in the Congressional Award program. Your achieve- ments in 'personal development and physical fitness are admirable, and the initiative, achievement and excellence you have demonstrated in voluntary service to others and to your community is an inspiration to all. I regret I will not be able to attend the presentation ceremony on April :9, 'but .would like to extend to you an invitation to attend our Council Meeting of April 11 so that each member of Council can personally offer their congratulations. Once again, our best personal wishes to you.. You are a -credit to your community. Sincerely, ` Tom Brian Mayor _ TB:mh 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.6nu 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223, (503}6394171 ?� t3F Yr: :;rS._. E�.r;�v i >•'t u '�' T a : t` 0;` t 4 it t„fj a s 1 }J � t r LYss �4 DDPD Dcd aoq a is ea {: y/{'•' � � f s t^tFt F `��• 1 J f.,tJti"k�� t pmD ommm�=DDmomoogooc o� -�,{ � �;�PM_P6m ggDDPDOPllmq Pgdmd PPBdDDBOF1bq FmegG'qq4.dl4 DQb Gfl PDfltRPG DP dmq PggqhmPPP Dne:iq dA OOP tlGPPFggqqfln}F(T tj1' G {£�� � la F Vt,$;� }51.. kid Ij 3•4is3rTti�� ti� n is 33 y z7 u. • • • • •u - 1, a • • 3 ��. 3, r � •�� +ry h •�' °a �?'� � �- � Arlt i t{ c "t e 11• • • r .- 'a '�.w f5 t y ' a 'f�rvC• .La ' �� r ir.: Y qSC 'T`r2 y�l y f d d I�t'"ffi.•�� �: t 1 • �! "� Y r'. L a 't �h�F7 hY �Af;� • • ���f�f$ � `1 �{r iir5 own ILL gs xs ! 1 ''4.�3 t• 5 ! moi.t k,.�. l •'y� tF;� •b` K 3 r b f ��r L r a D �1 d). L z t,4 7r, r N.x" x i} •.a Y 4 ,� p}.°'}y �r-t;} Lt i x r ;; r•tI Y n i -:+.i• TA -:1t -2r..�.y'k..z,a.'`'f._�l..c...:i.l�i �a:t rx?.St �rY E e 7, ...n 5.�.-. •,.I.�i�'r.�'S? r i..,.�..e:.,.... ,:u•...r.. ...eF ,r.;i .a t. m... .-, .,,}«, �w.>,"�.,•..,..„Y3. f..,:��n ..c.3},..5'.,r_*4I. 5 Z. , L ff CITY OF TI:GARD,,—OREGON E COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 26, 1988 — DATE SUBMITTED: March 17,_1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: _ Keys to the City T ` PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet x DEPT HEAD;OKE- CITY ADMIN 01< REQUESTED BY Mayor & Council --POLICY-ISSUE Recognition of volunteer service to the City of Tigard by Presentation of a t "Key to;the City.,, INFORMATION SUMMARY , Patrick J. Furrrer, Attorney at Law, served on the Economic Development Committee from March, ,1987 through, January, 1988. His voluntary service to the City `of` Tigard is very much appreciated and he is being recognized by presentation of a "Key to the City." R r, -''ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED F.. g4V C FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION do:3681D 1, lgjgl�gi I s { T t, � a A"/5A 27 M t U: jF �q FY y .r �x r v r- r ► `� �, • \ 1 ��}(fiF:IJ } r O) • 1/' j sa 6/i.�4,,..,��,� 71r t� -��� it �1�' I'�t� '1�� h�► h� '�-� h� h�� ;_ � � t 1 h5 7i ///�"` sem^? r.�`rr 1=• .., l'�'" `s ; R 41 1 Alt rr,3 r #? � , r c"y a. � �a ♦♦ � , e r k, —24 �x i s ��C;• rr ��'��`s� i 4 �: !`'��4.. k� r/i�..,�" .�,;:.1{It -` .\�1�:1f����� 5a�\�,,lli,. ,���,��t,��''� ��!:�:,....�j t�:�/,A.'li O'k.rli \� .f1.�1� y>rlrx,,��+•7tf �z���Z� s � v��l 11��� ry�- �1 � �I} r1� s/=�}�,�Ir.a r it Va air-fP�a �,a f t t t���f.7.{Y •'�', �P 1 j� ��: q � a a ,�► :.1 �"xs a i .+U.. i3c� .�, � a.*}�'�^�'� i•s,� .,r �, m:�'',� ,� y �-,§r4 r• ;tft J: rt � .r- � r•� �'a , !ut { a ¢ ���"f et >< �y t, f .i. �,t.:;'�` .,r.���.,�,�`> }.-.�•' a_ Fr{Pts, e+ t.�:.,,...�' {:�.,..x� '� 1 _d sem^ _•,.:. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA.ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 28, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: March 7, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Oath of Office PREVIOUS ACTION: ; -- —'Patrol Officer f Sheila Rae°Ja son PREPARED BY: David C. Lehr DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK cpS REQUESTED BY: David C. Lehr INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 1st, the Police Department hired Sheila Rae Jackson to fill the Council-authorized position of patrol officer. Ms. Jackson is a native of Washington state and is a 1976 graduate of Hudson Bay High School, Vancouver, Washington. She has 'earned 86 "quarter hours of credit from Gadsden Jr. College at Gadsden, Alabama. Ms. Jacksonisa veteran of the U.S. Army, serving in the military police. Her service ' included .performing as a patrol officer.icer. She also worked undercover with a CID narcotics suppression team. Most-of her military police experience will serve her well as a patrol officer for the City of Tigard. In addition to other skills, Ms. Jackson speaks French, Korean and Spanish fluently. The Police Department feels fortunate in having Officer Jackson as one of it's members. SUGGESTED ACTION Administer the Oath of Office. G ca/3572D { 111 i ZEN 11:11 I 5 OATH OF OFFICE State of Oregon ) City of Tigard ) Do you, Sheila Jackson, solemnly swear that you will uphold and support the Constitution and laws of the United States of America and the State of Oregon' and the Charter and ordinances of the City of Tigard. That you will faithfully,' honestly, and impartially discharge , the duties of office of Police officer, during your continuance;therein to the best;of your ability,` so help you God. And do you further affirm that youarenot now, nor have you everbeen at any time, a member of any organization advocating the overthrow of the United States Government. i T T G A R'D _ C T 1 YC 0 U N C 3. L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - February 1, 1988 - 6:35 PM 1. ROLL CALL: Present: President of Council, Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, -Valerie Johnson (arrived at 7:49 PM)` and John Schwartz; Cityg Staff: - Ken Fox, Legal .Counsel .(left 8:15 PM)' Bob Jean, City Administrator (arrived 6:40 PM); Keith Liden (arrived 8:05 PM left 9:00 PM); Jill Monley, Community Services Director ,(left- 8:15 PM - returned 8:47 PM); Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel (arrived at 6:44 PM); Nadine Robinson, Records/Court Manager (left at 8:15 PM); Loreen Wilson,_ City Recorder; & Randy Wooley, Acting Community Development Director/City Engineer (arrived at 8:56 PM). 2. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to: 2.1 Receive and File Council Meeting Calendar Update 2.2. Approve Board and Committee Appointments: a. NPO Reappointments - Resolution No. 88-12 b. Various BoardandCommittee Appointments - Res. No. 88-13 2.3 Approve Streets CIP Revision Recommendation 2.4 Approve Resolutions of Final Acceptance: a., Bond Park No. 2 Subdivision —Resolution No. 88--14 b. Bond Park No. 3 Subdivision - Resolution No. 88-15 a. City Recorder submitted an amended resolution under Item ,2.2 b noting that the Mayor's Advisory Committee had recommended the addition of Richard Morley for appointment to the City Center Plan Task Force Committee. They also added to the Utility and Franchise Committee two appointments, John Cochran & Daniel Walsh. b Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to amend ,Resolution No. 88--13 as recommended and approve consent agenda as amended. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 3. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: a. Councilor Eadon stated that Mr . Rob Walsh was working with St. Anthony's- auction and stated that they wished to dedicate some proceeds from the auction to the City. It was suggested perhaps the Interpretive Center in Fanno Creek Park might be appropriate. Councilor Eadon requested any suggestions be directed to her by the end of the week. CITY ADMINISTRATOR ARRIVED: 6:40 PM 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA: No one appeared to speak. LEGAL COUNSELOR RAMIS ARRIVED: 6:45 PM 5. NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. MACC franchise update -• City Administrator advised Council that MACC was about ready to hold public hearings for the transfer and sale of the Tidel Cable Company to Columbia. He stated the company was financially stable and had operated other cable systems focusing on customer service. " Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1988 i V MEN= 1{ COUNCILOR JOHNSON ARRIVED: 7:49 PM City Administrator further explained that MACC recognized the need to increase the use of community access channels. He stated om able �. MACC's recommendation was to eventually mouteo fbeing�F�runc and r system being awned by a private company eventually purchased by MACC. He explained the tentative P; agreement with Columbia and >noted the franchise Tee was i y, 30% to F recommended to be split three wa s, 52-1. 2% to the City. MACC, and 17-1/2% to access programming. r Discussion followed regarding the private nonprofit api:ion versus cable company performing contract obligations over the next few years. Councilor Johnson voiced philosophical concerns with that issue and stated she would want to study the idea further before making a commitment. is Consensus of Council was.. to receive the report: and requested Councilor Eadon and City Administrator to continue reporting on the MACC franchise issue. b. Coun_.•_ c?1V Calendar Update City Administrator discussed additional meetings to be noteon the Council calendar: addition of 2--9 d ODOT hearing at the Civic Center regarding 2--17 Study Project; 2-17 at noon, the East County Meeting at Tualatin City Hall. 6, STUDY SESSION — Court Study Recommendation a, Community Services Director presented a written report noting the history and growth of thca study: issues. She further stated that there was some pressure for a'decision to be made soon, since the 3 minor traffic caseload had increased well over 2.00 percent and the Washington Square caseload estimates had been adjusted. The Community Services Director explained the h-F Option, noting that the participants in the Court study felt this option would provide a high quality of service to the citizens, while a positive cash flow would be maintained. b. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the phase-in of the misdemeanor caseload. The concern regarding what caseload volume actually came out of Washington Square and a concern regarding the police officer's overtime and downtime as it related to court. C, Legal Counsel Ramis shared concerns that he had discussed with Washington County's District Attorney regarding the role of the prosecutor in the criminal cases and noted concern regarding the type of criminal which the court would see coming from Washington Square. He stated that the District Attorney had observed a more professional criminals being involved from the Square and in turn, these cases required more time to prosecute. Legal Counsel ct further suggested the City Council weigh both the o�sibilityscal �of and the service impact. He stated, looking at the p it may mean service charge backs by the County in the future, y it's untimely now to make this move. Page 2 — COUNCILMINUTES FEBRUARY 1, 1908 d. After further discussion, the Council consensus was to implement Option 2+ whichwould include Municipal Court hearing minor traffic and parking cases only, with night court; to start as soon as possible. Council expressed concern regarding the lack of substantiated data on the Washington Square caseload and the amount of overtime/downtime Tigard Police Officers currently experienced through District'Court. The Council wished to, not be discriminatory in the level' of service given to citizens and merchants' in the City, however, they expressed concern about making the change to hear all the misdemeanor-caseload at this time. Council expressed a desire to enhance the service level the Court currently offers to citizens by beginning the Night Court' Option. Council dir-ected staff to investigate options available for hearing the misdemeanor caseload in other courts, while 'keeping an eye to city cost containment. Council requested the Committee gather information on a City-wide basis to attempt to better, define the amount and type of caseload being generated, both in the misdemeanor and major traffic categories, and to also prepare information regarding police Officer overtime, the number- of court--related trips and ,downtime spent in processing ' those cases in other courts Council requested an update report in September '88 and February '89. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN ARRIVED: 8:05 PM e. City Council consensus was to continue to lobby for an ,'East County District Court. , Council President Edwards rioted that the population in Washington County was most dense in the East County ` area and felt that the East County District: Court should be studied thoroughly by Washington County. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR,, LEGAL COUNSEL FOX, AND RECORDS/COURT MANAGER LEFT: 8:15 PM 7. SOLAR ACCESS DISCUSSION a. Senior Planner Liden advised Council that a joint study group in the Portland Metropolitan area had been studying the Solar Access project. He. stated that Tigard had participated, along with 21 other local jurisdictions, and that the intent was to establish a uniform approach in the Metro area with similar policies or ordinances to protect Solar Access within single—family, residential developments. He submitted a drafted mode]. ordinance for new subdivisions, residences on existing lots (in—fill), and protection of solar systems from future shade. Senior Planner, Liden stated that there was a consultant available to meet: with Council should they wish more information. He requested direction from Council as to the City's participation in the process, noting that a public, hearing should be scheduled by the end of April should the City wish to participate in the project. b. Council members advised staff that though the Solar Access project was the right direction for the Metro area to follow, they had no desire at this point to hold a public hearing nor r make this part of the City's development requirements. Pane 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 1, 1988 c, Councilor Johnson noted her appreciation to City staff for following the Metro-wide emphasis in this area and also rioted her appreciation of staff limiting their time on the project. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN LEFT: 8:45 PM 8 CIVIC 'CENTER ARCHITECT SELECTION a. City Administrator recommended a feasibility study be developed in a three--phase approach to allow the City to maximize the area on the Civic Center site. He suggested the following phases; o Phase 1 (approximately $10,000), develop a long-term space planning for the site; o Phase 2 (approximately $ 0,000), develop functional arrangements and design 'options for- enlarging the building; o Phase 3, once Phase 2 is completed give staff suggestions for immediate remodel needs. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RETURNED: 8:47 PM City Administrator stated he had interviewed six architects. He felt three of the architects could' do the job and recommended that HDN be the group that would be selected to do the job. He answered questions Council directed regarding HDN' s references. -'CITY ENGINEER ARRIVED: 8:56 PM b. Consensus of Council was to direct the City Administrator to negotiate with HDN for• bothPhase l and 2 scope of work. " RECESS City Council Meeting -- 8:58 PM 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 9:00 PM under the provisions of ORS 192.660(l)(d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. ADJOURNMENT: 9:17 PM Approved by the Tigard City Council on March 28, 1986. City Recorder - City of 'Tigard ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard lw/37A7D Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1988 T I G A RD C T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - 'February; 1, 1988 - 6:35 PM_" 1. ROLL CALL: Present: President of Council, Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson (arrived at 7:49 PM), and John Schwartz; City Staff: Ken Fox, Legal Counsel -(left 8:15 PM); Bob Jean, City Administrator (arrived 6:40 PM); Keith Liden (arrived 8:05 PM - left 9:00 PM); Jill Monley, ' Community Services Director (left 8:15 PM returned 8:47 PM); Tim 'Ramis, Legal Counsel (arrived at 6:44 PM); Nadine Robinson;. Records/Court Manager- (left at 8:15 PM); Loreen Wilson, City Recorder; & Randy Wooley, Acting Community Development Director/City Engineer- (arrived at 8:56 PM). 2. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to: 2.1 Receive and File'Council Meeting Calendar Update 2.2 Approve Board and Committee Appointments: a. NPO Reappointments - Resolution No. 88-12 -b. Various Board and Committee Appointments - Res. No. 88-13 2A Approve Streets CIP Revision Recommendation 2.4' Approve Resolutions of Final Acceptance: a, Bond Park No 2 Subdivision - Resolution No. 88-14 b. Bond Park No.' 3 Subdivision - Resolution No. 88-15 a. City Recorder submitted an amended resolution under Item 2.2 b noting that the Mayor's Advisory Committee had recommended the addition of Richard Morley for appointment to the 'City Center Plan Task Force Committee. They also added to the Utility and Franchise Committee two appointments, John Cochran & Daniel Walsh.' �• b. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to amend Resolution No. 88-13 as recommended and approve consent agenda as amended. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, 3 NON-AGENDA ITEMS: a. Councilor Eadon stated that Mr. Rob Walsh was working with St. Anthony's auction and stated that they wished to dedicate some proceeds from the auction to the City. It was suggested perhaps the Interpretive Center in Fanno Creek Park might be appropriate. Councilor Eadon requested any suggestions be directed to her by the end of the week. CITY ADMINISTRATOR ARRIVED: 6:40 PM 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA: No one appeared to speak. LEGAL COUNSELOR RAMI5 ARRIVED: 6:45 PM 5. NOW-AGENDA ITEMS a. MACC franchise update- City Administrator advised Council that MACC was about ready to hold public hearings for the transfer and sale of the Tidel Cable Company to Columbia, Fie stated the company was financially stable and had operated other cable systems focusing on customer* service: Page`1 - COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 1, 1988 a COUNCILOR JOHNSON.ARRIVED: 7:49 PM City_ Administrator further explained that MACC recognized the need to increase the use of community access channels. He stated MACC's recommendation was to eventually move from the cable system being owned by a private company to being runand eventually purchased by MACC. He explained the tentative agreement with Columbia and noted the franchise fee was recommended to be split three ways, 52-1/2% to the City, 30% to MACC, and 17-1/2% to access programming. Discussion followed regarding the private nonprofit option versus cable company performing contract obligations over the next few ;years. Councilor Johnson voiced philosophical concerns with that issue and stated .she would want to study the idea further before making a commitment. Consensus of Council was to receive the report and requested Councilor Eadon and City _Administrator to continue reporting on the MACC franchise issue: b. - ` Council Calendar Update City Administrator discussed additional meetings to be noted on the Council calendar: addition of 2-9- ODOT hearing at the Civic Center regarding 2-17 Study Project; 2-17 at noon, the East County Meeting,at Tualatin City Hall. 6. " STUDY SESSION - Court Study Recommendation a. Community Services Director presented a written report noting the history and growth of the study issues. She further stated that there was some pressure for-a decision to be made soon, since the s minor traffic caseload had increased well over 200 percent and: the Washington Square caseload estimates had been adjusted. The Community Services Director ,explained the h+ Option, noting that the participants in the Court study felt this option would provide a high quality of service to the citizens, while a positive cash flow would be maintained. b. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the phase-in of the misdemeanor caseload. The concern regarding what caseload volume actually came out of Washington Square and a concern regarding the police officer's overtime and downtime as it related to court. C. Legal Counsel Ramis shared concerns that he had discussed with Washington County's District Attorney regarding the role of the prosecutor in the criminal cases and noted concern regarding the type of criminal which the court would see coming from Washington Square. tie stated that the District Attorney had observed a more professional criminals being involved from the Square and in turn, these eases required more time to prosecute. Legal Counsel further suggested the City Council weigh both the fiscal impact and the service impact. He stated, looking at the possibility of service charge backs by the County in the future, it may mean it's untimely now to make this move. Page 2 —COUNCIL MINUTES - I"EBRUARY`1, 1900 d, After further discussion, the Council consensus was to implement option 2+ which would include Municipal Court hearing minor traffic and parking cases only, with night court to start as soon as possible. Council expressed concern regarding the lack of substantiated data on the Washington Square caseload and the amount of overtime/downtime Tigard > Police Officers currently experienced through District Court, The Council wished to not be discriminatory in the level of service given to citizens and merchants in the City, however, they expressed concern about making the change to hear all the misdemeanor caseload at this time. Council expressed a desire to enhance the service level the Court currently offers to citizens by beginning, the Night Court Option. Council'; directed staff to investigate options available for hearing the misdemeanor caseload in other courts, while keeping an eye to City cost containment. Council requested the Committee gather information on a City-wide basis to attempt to better define the amount and typeofcaseload being generated, both in the misdemeanor and major traffic categories, and to also prepare information regarding Police officer overtime, the number of court-related trips .and downtime spent in processing those cases in other courts. Council requested an update report in September 188 and; February '89. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN ARRIVED: 8:05 PM e. City Council consensus was to continue to lobby for an East County 'District Court. Council President Edwards noted that the population in Washington County was most dense in the East County area and felt that the East County District Court should be studied thoroughly by Washington County, ILL COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, LEGAL COUNSEL FOX, AND RECORDS/COURT MANAGER LEFT: 8:15 PM 7. SOLAR ACCESS DISCUSSION' a. Senior Planner Liden advised Council that a joint study group in the Portland Metropolitan area had been studying the Solar Access project. He stated that Tigard had participated, along with 21 other local jurisdictions, and that the intent was to establish a uniform approach in the Metro area with similar policies or ordinances to protect Solar Access within single-family, residential developments. He submitted a drafted model ordinance for new subdivisions, residences on existing lots (in-fill), and protection of solar systems from future shade. Senior Planner Lidenrote stated that there was a consultant available to meet with nformation. He requested Council should they wish more i direction from Council as to the City's participation in the process, noting that a public hearing should be scheduled by the end of April should the City wish to participate in the project. staff that though b. Council members advised the Solar Access project was the right direction for the Metro area to follow, they had no desire at this point to hold a public hearing nor make this part of the City's development requirements. Page3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1988 c. Councilor Johnson noted her appreciationto City staff for following the Metro-wide-emphasis in this area and also noted her appreciation of staff limiting their time on the project. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN LEFT: 8:45 PM 4 8. CIVIC CENTER ARCHITECT SELECTION f a. City Administrator recommended a feasibility study be developed allow the Cit to maximize the area in a three—phase approach to y on the Civic Center site. He suggested the following phases: o Phase 1 (approximately $10,000), develop along—term space planning Tannin for the site; o Phase2 (approximately $40 000) develop functional in arrangements and design options for enlarging the building; o Phase 3, once Phase 2 is completed give staff suggestions i for immediate remodel needs. f COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RETURNED: 8:47 PM City Administrator stated he had interviewed six architects. He feltthree of the architects could do the job ,and recommended that HDN be the group that would be selected to do the job. He ; answered questions Council directed regarding HDN's references. t CITY ENGINEER'ARRIVED: 8:56 PM b. Consensus of Council was to direct the City Administrator to negotiate with HDN 'for both Phase 1 and 2 scope of work. RECESS - City,Council Meeting — 8:58 PM } 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went ; into Executive Session at 9:00 PM under the provisions of QRS 192.660(1)(d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current , and pending litigation issues. ADJOURNMENT: 9:17 PM Approved by the Tigard City Council on March 28, 1988. City Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST 4 Mayor —'City of Tigard I f lwl3747D I Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1988 � f; 1 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - February 1, 1988 - 6:35 PM 4. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: President of Council, Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson (arrived at 7:49 PM), and John Schwartz; City Staff: Ken Fox, Legal Counsel (left 8:15 PM); Bob Jean, City Administrator (arrived 6:40 PM); r' Keith Liden (arrived 8:05 PM - left 9:00 PM); Jill Manley, Community Services Director (left 8:15 PM - returned.8:47 1 PM); Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel (arrived at 6:44 PM); Nadine Robinson, Records/Court Manager (left at 8:15 PM); Loreen Wilson, City Recorder; & Randy Wooley, Acting Community Development, Director/City Engineer ,(arrived at 8:56 PM). 2. CONSENT AGENDA - Motion to: 2.1 Receive and File Council Meeting Calendar Update ; 2.2- Approve Board and Committee Appointments: a. NPO Reappointments - Resolution No. 88-12 ` b. Various Board and Committee Appointments - Res. No. 88-13 2.3 "Approve Streets CIP Revision Recommendation 2.4 Approve Resolutions of Final Acceptance: a. Bond Park No. 2 Subdivision - Resolution No. 88-14 b. Bond Park No. 3 Subdivision - Resolution No. 88-15 a. City Recorder submitted an amended resolution under Item '2.2 b noting that the Mayor's Advisory Committee had recommended the addition of Richard Morley for appointment to the City Center Plan Task Force Committee. They also added to the Utility and Franchise Committee two appointments, John Cochran & Daniel Walsh. b. Motion by Councilor-Schwartz,-seconded by Councilor Eadon, to amend Resolution No. 88-13 as recommended and 'approve consent agenda as amended. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 3. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: a. Councilor Eadon stated that Mr. Rob Walsh was working with St. Anthony's auction and stated that they wished to dedicate some proceeds from the auction to the City. It was suggested perhaps the Interpretive Center in Fanno Creek Park might be appropriate. Councilor Eadon requested any suggestions be directed to her by the end of the week. CITY ADMINISTRATOR ARRIVED: 6:40 PM ` 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA: No one appeared to speak. ' LEGAL COUNSELOR RAMI:S ARRIVED: 6:45 PM 5. NON-AGENDA ITEMS _ a. MACC franchise update City Administrator advised Council that MACC was about ready to hold public hearings for the transfer and sale of the Tidel Cable Company t Columbia. He` stated the company was financially stable and had operated other cable E- systems focusing on customer servi.c:e. Page 1 - COUNCIL'MINUTES FEBRUARY 1, 1908 COUNCILOR JOHNSON ARRIVED: 7:49 PM City Administrator further explained that MACC recognized the need to increase the use of community access channels. He stated MACC's recommendation was to eventually move from the cable system being owned" by a private company to being run and eventually purchased by MACC. He explained the tentative agreement with Columbia and noted the franchise fee was recommended to be split three ways,' 52-112% to the City, 30% to MACC, and 17-1/2% to access programming. Discussion followed regarding the private nonprofit option versus cable company performing contract obligations over the next few 1 years. Councilor Johnson voiced philosophical concerns with that issue and stated she would want to study the idea further before making a commitment. Consensus of Council was to 'receive the report and requested '' Councilor Eadon and City ;Administrator to continue reporting,on ; the MACC franchise issue. - b. Council Calendar Update City Administrator discussed additional meetings to be noted on the Council calendar: addition of 2-9 ODOT hearing at the Civic Center regarding 2-17 -Study Project; 2-17 at noon, the East County Meeting at Tualatin City Hall. 6. STUDY SESSION -'Court Study Recommendation a. Community Services Director presented a written report noting the {_ history and growth of the study' issues. She further stated that there was some pressure for a-decision to be made soon, since the minor traffic caseload had increased well over 200 percent and the Washington Square caseload estimates had been adjusted. The Community Services Director explained the 4+ Option, noting that the participants in the Court study felt this option would provide a high quality of service to the citizens, while a positive cash flow would be maintained. b. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the phase-in of the misdemeanor caseload. The concern regarding what caseload volume actually came out of Washington Square and a concern regarding the police officer's overtime and downtime as it related to court. C. Legal Counsel Ramis shared concerns that he had discussed with Washington County's District Attorney regarding the role of the prosecutor in the criminal cases and noted concern regarding the type of criminal which the court would see coming from Washington Square. He stated that the District Attorney had observed a more professional criminals being involved from the Square and in turn, these cases required more time to prosecute. Legal Counsel I further suggested the City Council weigh both the fiscal impact and the service impact. He stated, looking at the possibility of service charge backs by ,the County in the future, it may mean it's untimely now to make this move. Page 2 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 1, .19x(3 d. After further discussion, the Council consensus was to implement Option 2+ which would include Municipal Court hearing minor traffic and parking cases only, with night court to start as soon Af as pos:3ible. Council expressed concern regarding the lack of substantiated data on the Washington Square caseload and the amount of overtime/downtime Tigard Police Officers currently exp,arienced through District Court, The Council wished to not be discriminatory in the level of service given to citizens and merchants in the City, however, they expressed 'concern about making the change to hear all the misdemeanor caseload' at this time. Council expressed a desire to enhance the service level the Court currently_ offers to citizens by beginning the Night Court option. Council directed staff to investigate options available for hearing the misdemeanor caseload in other courts, while keeping an eye to City cost containment. Council requested the Committee gather information on a City-wide basis to attempt F to better define the amount and type of caseload being generated, both in the misdemeanor and major traffic categories, and to also prepare information regarding Police Officer overtime, the number t of court-related trips and downtime spent' in processing those cases in other courts. ' Council requested an update report in September '88 and February 89. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN ARRIVED: 8:05 PM e. City Council consensus was to continue to lobby for an East County District Court. Council President Edwards,noted that the I population in Washington County was most dense in the East County area and felt that the East County_ District Court should be studied thoroughly by Washington County. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, LEGAL COUNSEL FOX, AND RECORDS/COURT' MANAGER LEFT: 8:15 PM 7. SOLAR ACCESS DISCUSSION a. Senior Planner Liden advised Council that a joint study group in the Portland Metropolitan area had been studying the Solar Access project. He stated that Tigard had participated, along with 21 other local jurisdictions, and that the intent was to establish a uniform approach in the Metro area with similar policies or ordinances to protect Solar Access within single—family, residential developments. He submitted a drafted model ordinance for new subdivisions, residences on existing lots (in—fill), and protection of solar systems from future shade. Senior Planner Liden stated that there was a consultant available to meet with Council should they . wish more information. He requested direction from Council as to the'_City's participation in the process, noting that a public hearing should be scheduled by the end of April should the City wish to participate in the project. b. Council members advised staff that though the Solar Access r project was the right direction for the Metro area to follow, f they had no desire at this point- to hold a public hearing nor make this part of the City's development requirements. Page 3 COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1988 c. Councilor Johnson noted her 'appreciation to City staff for following the Metro—wide emphasis in this area and also noted her appreciation of staff limiting their time on the project. SENIOR PLANNER LIDEN LEFT: 8:45 PM 8. CIVIC CENTER ARCHITECT SELECTION a. City. Administrator recommended a feasibility study be developed in a three-phase approach to allow the City to maximize the area on the Civic Center site, He suggested the following, phases: o Phase 1 (approximately $10,000), develop a long-term space planning for the site; o Phase 2 (approximately $40,000), develop functional arrangements and design options for enlarging the building; o Phase 3, once Phase 2 is completed give staff suggestions for immediate remodel needs: COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RETURNED: 8:47 PM City Administrator stated he had interviewed six architects. He felt three of the architects could do the job and recommended that HDN be the group that would be selected to do the job.'' He answered questions Council directed regarding HDN's references. CITY ENGINEER ARRIVED: 8:56 'PM b. Consensus of Council was to direct the City Administrator to negotiate with HDN for both Phase l and 2 scope of work. RECESS City Council Meeting — 8:58 PM 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard 'City Council went into Executive Session at 9:00 PM under the provisions ,of ORS 192.660(1)(d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. ADJOURNMENT: 9:17 PM Approved by the Tigard City Council on March 28, 1988. L0_ City Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard lw/3747D Page 4 COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 1, 1988 r CITY OF 'TIGARD, OREGON � MEMORANDUM w - R TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 15, 1988 a FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator J SUBJECT: COUNCIL. CALENDAR, FY 1987-88 $ t Attached is an updated tentative calendar, for this fiscal year. Official Council meetings are marked with an asterisk (*). I've put question marks (7) g along side those still needing Council OK. If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. s 7 March '88 17, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) Location TBA *28, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) Dartmouth LID & Sign Code Hearings *29, Tues Budget Committee (Recommendation) r April '88 Tentative date for Beaverton joint meeting`??'??? 1, Fri Community Development Director Assessment Center & s Interview (5:30 Council/6:00 Social Hour/6:80 Dinner, at Embassy Suites Hotel) *11, tion Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) X12, Tues Council Executive Session (6:00?) *15-16, Fri—Sat Council Workshop x•18, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) (Meet with Park Board) 20, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) — Beaverton Library 21, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) — Location TBA 22, Fri Metro Managers Meeting (2:00-5:00, Social Hour, to . follow) *25, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)(Meet with City Center Plan Task Force) *26, Tues volunteer Awards & Recognition (6:30) I, t Mother's Da 8, Sun Mo y *9, Mon Council Business Agenda (6;30/7:30) i *16, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) (Meet with Planning Comm.) 18, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) — Beaverton Library 19, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) — Location TBA t x•23, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) � 30, Mon Memorial Day t Council Calendar - Rage l G 11111 MITI E June '88 June? Council Workshop (w/Staff?) *13, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30)-Budget Hearing 14, Tues Flag Day r 15, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library i 16, Thurs Community Development Block Grant Planning Advisory Board (7:30) Location TBR 19, Sun Father's Day *20, Mon Council Study Agenda (6;30)-City Center• Plan Task Force? *27, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) i; July '86 4, Mon Fireworks *11, Mon Council Business Agenda, (6:30/7:30) #-18, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) - Transportation Committee? G 20, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30)---Beaverton Library M *25, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) I 29-31, Fri-Sun Oregon Mayors Association Meeting August '8g *8, Mori Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *15, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) -- City Center Task Force? X22, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) September '88 *Sept Neighborhood Town Halls 5, Mon Labor Day *12, Mori Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) � d *19, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) - Park Board? 21, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library E *26, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) t October '88 f` *Oct Neighborhood Town Halls *10, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 10, Mon Columbus Day *17, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) - Utility & Franchise Comm.? 19, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) -- Beaverton Library *24, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 31, Mon Halloween 1 t November '88 8, Tues Election Day 12-15, Sat-Tues League of Oregon Cities Conf. in Portland X•14, Mon Council Business Agenda (6;30/7:30) 16, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library x•21, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) - Economic Dev.7 24-25, Thurs-Fri Thanksgiving Holiday �A Council Calendar, - Page 2 1 ' MON III IgIviggi: f' December '88 ?Dec Council Goals Workshop? K-5, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *12, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) -• Library Board? *19, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 21, Wed MACC Meeting (1:30) - Beaverton Library 26, Mon Christmas Holiday January '89 2., Mon New Year's Day 16, Mon Marian Luther King, Jr. Holiday February '89 ; 14, Tues Valentine's Day r' 20, Mon President's Day ` March '89 17, Fri St, Patrick's Day 24, Fri Good Friday 26, Sun Easter May_ '89 14, Sun Mother's Day 29, Mon Memorial Day June '89 14, Wed Flag Day 18, Sun Father's Day July '89 4, Tues Independence Day r September '89 4, Mon Labor Day V October '89 31, Tues Halloween November '89 23-24, Thurs-Fri Thanksgiving Holiday December '89 25, Mon Christmas Holiday mh0028a Council Calendar - Page 3 E lmmli z lc , ol CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF:, March 28, 1986 DFlIE SUBMITTED: _March 18, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report PREVIOUS ACTION: Community Services De t. —fon---PREPARED BY: �D Curbetu~— February, 198 _ REQUESTED BY Mayor. and Council DEPT HEAD OiC� CITY ADMIN 01 Q �..._... _ ..= y� - POLICY ISSUE Community Services Department Monthly Report for February, 1988 - INFORMATIONSUMMARY Attached, please find the Community Services Department Monthly Report for February, 1988. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Review and File dc:1446p/0015p MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Honorable Mayor, and City Council March 18, 1988 FROM: Jill Monley, Community Services Director SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report for February, 1988 COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINI` STRATjON Significant emphasis was placed this month on polishing our recommended budget in order, ' to stay within the five year planctttsmartermaintain andcurrent effici.ently ratherlevels Of `th� just We are making a ,concerted effort to think and a do what we have done in the past. ased on The court study report was presented to Lym�nor`ltraft` c l and pand�sparking,scourt B service the decision to pare back to a str g provision, we will be,putting together, a plan to phase out the handling of misdemeanors by Jul 1, 1988, with most of those being phased out by September, 1988. This will not y r tr `h1 month,umic-•r willbeh�bringir�gtine partrtime u reduce court staff workload untemporary caseload is still increasing ea help to assist us in processing this increased workload; Hopefully, this summer the -phase—out of misdemeanors will ting staff to handle the increased leave time for exis minor traffic caseload. The first annual Fanno Creek Conference was held on the 27th and is proclaimed `1 be big success. With more lead time, more volunteer assistance in planning implementation, and more knowl.Fg�o Creek Conferen e shouldputtingwhich we gained in together k�besm smoother andmore cost conference, the second annual effective. In an effort to develop our, maonabsenteeism a gement staff, Wcooperated deal the City of Forest Grove in providing a training session is The Personnel Assistant was selected and began work in late February. Her rworme and Maggie Bonner. Maggie has 9 years of experience in private sector personnel is eager, to apply her personnel knowledge to working for the City of Tigard. In the few short days since she has joined us, we have already observed significa nt benefit enti itand our ability to keep up with both workload and service to other city p' public. FINANCE/ACCOUNTINGto the nce Department Budgets were due Administratorinincorpor ztingr allrlbudget y in usubmissiansheintodthe Director assisted the 1988-89 Proposed Budget, The Proposed Budget douument was then reviewed by department heads before submission to the Budget Committee on March 1. Budget, approved by the Budget Committee in January, was The 1987-80 Supplemental at a public hearing. The Supplemental was then presented to Council on February 2.2, approved by Council through the passage of a resolution. j SOME=: C.S. Dept, Monthly Report Page 2 The Utility and Franchise Committee, staffed by the Finance Director, met with the City Council in February to seek further direction on several issues, An Office Assistant I position in Accounting was vacated by Neen Valenza in mid-February. Neen had been temporarily performing the majority of the City--wide purchasing functions anticipating a position in the 1988--84 budget for purchasing. 'The purchasing function will be split during this interim period among several Community Services Employees with Donna Corbet 'in the lead, The Burroughs computer went down for the third month in a row. Management Systems Northwestwho maintains our computer center, together with Bruce Olson, Computer• Manager, -coordinated the field engineers and a computer specialist in fixing our computer problem. TFie system was down three days. Utility billing ;and -accounts payable were only one day late going out in spite of the three day computer delay. CITY RECORDER Budget preparation for this section was completed. Court study results and their impacts were analyzed. The Recorder and Deputy Recorder workload responsibilities were reviewed and reorganized. 'The Deputy Recorder will be attending Council meetings until May; at that time , the workload will be reevaluated. "The City Recorder will continue to work with Code review, franchise agreements negotiations, resolution' review, agenda updates, purchasing process review, election trending and annexations information coordination. The City and Deputy Recorders were assigned to monitor prison site calls and to provide information as requested to citizens and business representatives. The Recorder's section facilitated efforts, as directed, for removal of the prison site from selection committee's list. i 4" Personnel related issues were addressed by the City Recorder, i.e. , new hires, role clarifications and cross training. . OFFICE SERVICES Word Processing Although WP had a 10.7 percent decrease in the number of work orders submitted, 909 additional pages were processed which is a 42.8 percent increase over last month. However, WP dropped turnaround time to 4 hours per work order which is an hour decrease in work order processing time. There was an 84 percent increase in the number of tapes submitted through the Word Processing Center. Staff also spent approximately 51 hours preparing the .proposed budget for i . � ludget Committee meetings. This 51 hours does not include time spent r performing minor- changes and reprints. i Work has been started on the Proofreading Manual which brings us closer to implementation and standardization of this procedure, In fact, we anticipate : noising in next month's report that we have implemented this ser -vice to staff. -MIR- C.S. Monthly Report Page 3 WP is now fully staffed with regular full—time employees. Karen Ellis joined our; staff on February 25. The team is functioning very efficientlywith her 6 addition. g office Support (Switchboard/Office Aides) F As with W.P., we are experiencing an increased demand on RUSH projects. s ort increased by 1.5 hours per, work order in Turnaround time for Office Supp February. The demand for support in this area was hampered by a vacant i position. Lack of Office Aide support has created an impact on the switchboard and was a 3% decrease in the average number of Message Center functions. There calls processed per day during February as compared to January. Office Services Management ces In addition to devoting time to developing and needs was g prroffice ov dedthane inithe f budget, more input into the City wide budgetary past. Due to this 'exposure, forms have been developed to make the process of ient and streamline the preparation of next statistical gathering more effic year's budget, �,. Because the Modular Unit waws added. on City grounds it was necessary to coordinate the installation of phone wiring and telephones for this area. In addition, Community Development conducted a major relocation'during the latter part of February. This _again required coordination, installation of new With a few exceptions (the phones, and programming changes where necessary. f Building recorder) these changes went on without a hitch. Phone indexes have been updated to reflect all current changes. COURT Although February was a short month the traffic caseload was again at 800 citations. Both clerks have been putting in overtime in an attempt to keep E the caseload current. The number of incoming calls have been tracked, an �- is spent on each one. At 723 calls, that means over- 40 average of 3.3 minutes lative to minor traffic actions alone. hours per month on the phone re The traffic accounts receivable has been monitored and the outstanding fines at the end of February were 27.5% lower than in January, t i RECORDS Bonnie Mulhearn, our new Records Office Assistant T, began February 16. She I to keep on has been a great help in beginning some programs that we have had hold for sometime. In addition to responding to daily records requests, we lave begun the process of converting the Planning records in the records room t to letter size file folders. �I CITY T of,-, T I I f Feu R MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT FEBRUARY 1968 1967-BS f`EBRL1Ai,`% REV I SED 1988 REVENUES BUDGET ACTUhL 7 (FED 1986) YTD GENERAL FUND y -_--=- ------ ----- '"AXES $21.040 190 $1.705.071 '(HER AGENCIES ,747 72 520 52-, FEES AND CHARGES 4$766..000 548.301 FINES AND FORFEITURES- s202.500 1.43.526 FRANCHISE FEES ss02.000 16 3.089 USE OF MONEY/FRCP bi0i.000 89 2 OTHER REVENUE 11lb..000 SUBTOTAL. -^s4. 197 857 BEGINNING FUND BAL 1,':14.661 1, =1.4.o6i TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6. t64,<12- 4.512.516 STATE GAS TAX 81/3.05-1 670 176 COUNTY-GAS TAX I 9,9111 1.75,50 1 COUNTY ROAD LEVY 1.:8,964. I ,'994 STREETS SDG 90y 66y 18 659 PARKS SDC 157 120 89.4511' SEWER FUND 1., 1:65.7031. 17 STORM DRAINAGE FUND 610,608 it05.929 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 4 623.950 6 752 POND DEBT FUND 2/4.'58 254.860 TOTAL REVENUES $15,7%17.1122 $B.67-L,. I 9 P "'GRAMS/DEPARTMENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES POLICE 32.0' 8,872 $1_5,00 807 COMMUNITY SERVICES ` 680.834 365.2144 MUNICIPAL COURT s`.f19.640 54.770 LIBRARY, r}11:1.1.80 960, SOCIAL SERVICES 4$445.600 a TOTAL COMM SERV 3.285,1 26 2.010.014 COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT -05,86 4 4 176.6 '. CD ADMIN ,_ DS BUILDING b5. 150.727 DS PLANNING 69.1104 155.i2e, DS ENGINEERING 22 5 591 J-17,14-7 PW ADMIN 8, BUILD 122.705 7.1..'716 PW SHOPS &'SERVICES 103,9;0 47.485 FW WASTEWATER :'18.544 204.452 PW STREETS & LIGHTS 611.780 _:61.667 PW PARKS & GROUNDS 187,872- ____1'25.566 66 -- TOTAL COMM DEVELOP 2.464.647- 1.44.1. " 1 POLICY'& ADMINISTRATION 172,000 98.62'9 C( ' WIDE SUPPORT NON DEPARTMENTAL 645,645 4-;8,445 CITY ATTORNEY 1,20, 61.12' TOTAL CITY WIDE ---- -765.645 - 645A99r66 OPERATING BUDGET 6.687.1114 4.049.542 DEBT SERVICE 184.450 5131.107 ALL OTHER 261.700 247.769 CIP-GENERAL CIF'-OTHER 5.62-:3,214 --- 550_-69 TOTAL CIF' 5.884,914 797..838 r CONTINGENCY/RESF_.RVES 192.335 GENERAL. OPERATING 192. 00 GENERAL RESERVE 1.008.000 1.000.000 947 OTHER FUNDS 768,709 768, ` --- TOTAL CONTINGENCY _1.,961.044 --1 961_^82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $15.:317.822 $7.339-769 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT WORK MEASURES FEBRUARY, 1988 i . I I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 2/87 2/88 SEWER^ 2/88 2/49 Accounts Payable Checks: 334 383 Sewer bills sent out 5424 6218 Vendor's 614 9�9 Sewer payments 3860 4929 � Check requests 320 225 Phone calls 257 248 Payroll checks 256 294 Treasurer's Receipts 679 927 Purchase Orders Processed 14 71 New Customer & Add. 348 203 chg. and Adjustments RECORDER'S OFFICE Year-to--Date 2/87 2/88 Resolutions processed 30 19 Ordinances processed 9 4 No, of Council Meetings 3 3 No. of Hours for Meetings 6.5 10 Agenda Items received, reviewed and followed 'up on (if necessary) 30- 28 Copy-.Volume for February CC Mtgs. 4,585 copies OFFICE SERVICES 2/Q7 _2/88 Number of Work Orders These 616 Number of Pages processed no. 's 22,892 Special Projects no L- 246 Average Turn-Around Time Per Work Order available 5.4 hrs PERSONNEL 2/87 2/88 Recruitments 4 4 5 6 Hires 2 Terminations 1 Unemployment Claims 2 2 Claims Filed: Worker's Compensation 0 3 0ther Liability 1 1 1446p/0015p 03/01/88 CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT' LOSS DATE CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 2/04/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter- cplt. 'pen (Officer Hal Merrill) 01/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending , (officer Merrill) 07/20/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened 03/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending 07/25/86 - R.A.;Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path pending 07/10/86 Thomas Arnholtz Hit manhole cover open 10/01/86 Hue Thi Phan Intersection accident CLOSED 2/88 _Police vehicle & claimants PD $3,364.86 vehicle - personalinjuries 01/09/87 Tuality COMM- Hosp. Allege City pay for treatment open of minor- child after officers called to home by mother because father was causing child abuse to infant. Officer Boothby - 10/17/87 Teresa Marie Sanchez Tort Claim _ alleges excessive open use of force during arrest. officer Killion 11/11/87 Marianne Lyles Claimant vehicle made 90 turn open . in front of city vehicle causing collision. 11/22/87 Russell Snyder - Sewer system backup into home. open Extensive damage 11/25/87 Rusty's Resale Sewer system backup into business CLOSED 1/88 on main street. PD $3,984.75 12/07/87 Andrea Carlson Claimant ran red light and hit- CLOSED 1/88 insureds 1979 Chevrolet — City Recd $528.60 bldg. insp. 12/28/87 City of Tigard Vehicle driven by Chief Lehr hit CLOSED 2/88 black ice, damage to 1986 PD $564.94 Chrysler LeBaron, 1/12/88 James Cohrs Hit monument cover in street open causing damage to 1985 Chev PU. 1/16/88 City of Tigard Wind blew branch of tree onto CLOSED 2/88 City's 1987 Chevette. PD $376.78 2/2/88 City of Tigard Stolen motorcycle helmet open Ofc. Harburg 1446p/0015p NON--STAFF RESOURCES/VOLUNTEER REPORT ; FEBRUARY 1988 YTD EST, Category 1985-86 1986-87 February '68 1987-88 _1987.-88 % Chancre Boards & Committees 3,108.75 2,601.75 254.50 1537.50 2306.25 12'Y Volunteer Staffing 5,171,25 7,272. 740.0 4,650.25 6,975,50 -5% TCYS N/A N/A -0- 1,190. 2,380. +100% Community Service 562. 2,387,25 136.75 1,490,75 2,236, -79b Other 283. 264.5 15% 13,897.75 +5 Total: 10,739.5 12,688.5 1,131.25 8,868..50 z !t K 60, CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 28, 1988 DATESUBMTF'ED: March 21, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report, PREVIOUS ACTION: January and February,44, PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley — DEPT HEAD 01 CITY ADMIN OK i REQUESTED BY: POL CY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached please find the Monthly Report for January- and February, 1988, prepared by the Department of Community Development', ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Receive and file. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. br/0950P/002.2P MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARp TO: Members of the City Council � March 21, 1988 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, Acting Director Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report — January and February, 1988 The Department of Community Development reports the following January and f February activity: Transition. The departure of Bill 'Monahan after several years as the Department's Director necessitated some temporary adjustment of work loads. Several key staff members have temporarily assumed additional work x responsibility under, an-interim plan to keep the Department working smoothly until a new Director is on board, f Development Activity. Proposals for new development remain strong in terms of site development reviews, construction plan reviews for new subdivisions, and requests for pre--application conferences with staff, It appears that 1968 will be another year of-tremendous growth in 'Tigard. Permits. Although the numbers of new building permits is down from last year, the valuation is much higher than last year. The January figures include issuance of a per•mi.t for major• construction at the Lincoln Towers project. 4 x Inspections. A dry winter• .;has allowed construction to continue. Both engineering and building inspectors have been kept very busy in the field. G Modular Building. The Engineering Division completed its move to the new modular building adjacent to City Hall. Some adjustments to office layout inside City Hall has allowed us to reduce noise levels and to provide better service to citizens at the front counter. Operations. Street sanding was required on several days in January. Routine maintenance activities continued. F Capital Improvement Programs. Design continued on all funded projects. Right—of—way acquisition was completed for the Durham/Hall turn lane project. Right—of—way donation was negotiated for• the signal and turn lane projects at Greenburg and Tiedeman. Design for the 135th Avenue LID is nearing completion and right—of--way discussions have begun with property owners. The State has awarded a construction contract for interim improvements at Scholls Ferry Rd./Old Scholls Ferry Rd. , which should also improve access from 135th Avenue. i' Memo ;to City Council January and 1=ebr•uary Monthly Report Page 2 Washington Countyhas announced a proposal to overlay the rough portion of Walnut Street east of 135th Avenue this summer. Prison Site. Data collected by the staff and provided to the architect and others aided the Council's "program to halt State consideration of a site on SW 74th Avenue as a potential prison site. Budget. During January and February, the Department's detailed budget proposal for 1988-89 was'yssembled. br/0950P/0022P BUILDING SECTION - JANUARY COMPARISON Following is a comparison of building activity for January of 1987 and 1908: January, 1987 7anuary, 1988 i 28 17 Single Family Permits8 5 Multi1 -Family Permits (units) 2 r` Commercial Permits (new) 116,830.00 $ 37,543.35 Building Permit Fees $ 9,389.63 $ 4,369.31 Plan Check Fees $ 4,492.50 $ 3,500.00 Plumbing Permits $ 1,668.50 $ 1,004.00 Mechanical Permits $ 4,302.,150.00 $13,456,876.00 k Valuation 6 - CALENDAR YEAR 1. is Jan. — 1987 Jan.___ 1988 28 17 Single Family Permits18 5 Multi—Family Permits (units) 2' t Commercial Permits (new) 1 16; $ 37,543.35 $ 830.00 Building Permit Fees $ 4,369 31 ` Plan Check Fees $ 9,389.63 $ 4;492.50. $ 3,500.00 Plumbing Permits 1,004.00 Mechanical Permits $ 1,668.50 $ Valuation $ 4,302,150.00 $13,456,876.00 FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON July — Jan - 1987 July — Jan. — 1988_ Single Family Permits 219 175 44 175 Multi-Family Permits (units) 16 22 251 Commercial Permits (new) $ 107,847.64 $ 166,328.49 Building Permit Fees $ 58,354.29 $ 72,795.77 Plan Check Fees $ 42,459.50 $ 42,401.10 $ Plumbing Permits 11,509.00 Mechanical Permits 10,996.50 $ $24,158,178.00 $46,496,373,00 Valuation br/0950P/0022P i V L r.� ri O G1 .-� :.N Q.. in 0. M IA -i t0 N E 0 C� w O N O 0 0 O 0 _0 O N N N C N a K40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HO A m 0 0 Ln 0 O 0 o O o Lr) o 0 H U M Q 10 O 0 N 0 N N N d 17 C C W ID O N -q N r, M d m p a �a H U z a 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 o 0 o O p < N Ln tD N .0 to N Lo W N O C m -q 0 N,. O N O to 0N LO p N d: 0 H ..-�.. dd w N M l0 01 ,-� .'tn w. O N H E C �D to w to d C tD it1 > �. H ry D O- 00 J Ua t0 w 01 w N N. M M N.'.N 0 CO M H -C C8 N. tD w %D N 00) w N 0 0 Ck U m 01 .N M O 0 0 O d d N o tD C 0. +a 0 0 0 0 N w O M O - o O un H O O 0 0 O N 0 0 O w p w M E . L O c m n Orn m W O w M w t m a m w ;D w M C N N to %0 N N d D. w w O w m N N %0 N N to M to �D u tD Lf N d 01 L mN .-� •-+ N .-+ .-i N .-� r N N .-i N m CD r-I 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O o �I t1� 4DN w w r ,.-,l 0 N N M Nko 0 N N O '-+ .---1 O %0 d00 N d N .4 m kD to d N :O m d tD 0 w .4 N O N N .4 m d to N t M t0 M N 1D C M N N m N -� O O O >1 a L L q {/ L � 4J Cl O \. C LO 0 5 r .-4 E m CEt E rib 4 N I 3 L U •i a 3i :3 -W 0 a a w J p C COC -0 L L :n C -4 Ul 0. P > U w [ O ai m a o o- z n n n a U O a ch r6 L -4h U. cC h h ¢ cn O c 0 , r,Immolling 1::i�i�� 1!1111l:illlll'!!Il !llllll' 11'1!1'111'1 n { .-a rd rd V L h N E 04 N O '� -a 0� + - C,4 N m m m E co co 0 O U . e LO C CA' '�• CA' C d 6 kD OD N c: f. M N N 4r h �D C co a N .h-E O. :. N tD 4 Lo N ,.m m m 0 A O 0 O 0 0 ,;0 A O 0 0 A 0 O 0 0 O O m O 0 uco m 0 o, ko m m A N a C iDC...�D. N m O NC Nh .N en A J rd ., m h o C , N C En h C f U O ci : W 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 H m m O 0 LO Eta 0 . 0 14 z .-( tD 0 N h cr b �D a C N C a N 0 hh C .4 to it) ..,..E C a h a N ON w a ,.C LO h Ln M , N m m m d Lo 0 tD h z a C C �.. U %D. C C- m. '.ds h .-+. Cv. N m H -cr > '� a N a m m 0 N; --E kO O N m k CD a N m C LD ED h co a A N C o CD a H r O )a 0 0 0 0 N O O m m C rr C Eta CO •4 O A En O 0 co co m m •4 a C m L 0 C h m a h 0 z c O m N m N m .--t h C O C h C .-s 0 0 m N Al D. m h h Q N a tD m tD 0 C hci LO �D N it h .-1 .•� hQ C C O 3 h ,�•E N N •� m rd 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O Q O U- 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 O C O m m .-E N m 4A co O LC) +-� N Q N h CD h a En N O h ,:3 M.••E fit) C 0 m to ua v� oo m A co > N tD C to. CT U) A C 1D tD O EI) U t0 O 14 0 r+ �o a O h C EI? ON m 0 LO m m 0 a 4 0 C h a O C kD L C a C h M tD a Eta Q M � w .••) Co O M N t6 0 L � as L L o (L •,, is S rd 7 H n 0) 12 E E O G co G s2 L L C -s Oi C. d.a > U t coI 1-1 rd L g BUILDING SECTION — FEBRUARY COMPARISON Following is a comparison of building activity for February of 1987 and 1988: FebruaryT 1987 February, 1988 Single Family Permits 39 20 ' Multi—Family Permits (units) 0 0 Commercial Permits (new) 0 3 Building Permit Fees $ 15,884.00 $ 17,034.85 Plan Check Fees $ 6;192.85 $ 9,025.57 Plumbing Permits $ 6,415.00 $ 852,80 Mechanical Permits $, 1,794.50 $ 3,411.93 Valuation $ 3,214,360.00 $ 4,678,965.00 h CALENDAR YEAR Jan.—Feb. , 1987Jan.—Feb. , 1988 Single Family Permits 67 37 � Multi--Family Permits (units) 18 5 g' Commercial Permits (new) 1 5 Building Permit Fees $ 32,714.00 $ 54,578.20 Plan Check Fees $ 15,582.48 $ 13,394.88 Plumbing Permits $ 10,907.50 $ 4,402.80 Mechanical Permits $ 3,463.00 $ 4,415.93 Valuation $ 7,516,510.00 $18,135,841.00 FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON - s July_ Feb. — 1987 July__ Feb. - 1988 Single Family Permits 258 195 Multi--Family Permits, (units) 44 251 Commercial Permits (new) 16 25 Building Permit Fees $ 123,731.64 $ 183,363.34 Plan Check Fees $ 64,547.14 $ 81,821.34 Plumbing Permits $ 48,874.50 $ 43,253.90 Mechanical Permits $ 12,791.00 $ 14,920.93 Valuation $27,372,538.00 $51,175,338.00 P' br^/0950P/0022P r6 U L at ,-t N C' 0 O M Lo 'i ko N M E 9 £ m O N O O O O O <O O N N N O i N v m ON, io o+ L7 n m rn m C .M- n+ o (p N M : ..t m N M M N M N N o O O O o O O 'O O 0 O O O M -a U) En O alt 0 O m o O O n O O Ch . C uy y njo O � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Lo 0 0 0 0 0 co 7- ' N Lo O 0 h M 0:1 N C' m N Ul co O to Lo co LO v C to Ln t h O m 3 0 Q �g � ,. Y _m.. 'D cr co N ''D m 0 h LO O ri [ H U b. co U w N N m m h N_ M LO _..N ko 0 to N to ai Q' t` O M ,N p V Ar : N O M O 1-1 d' to Z rd� Ui tD <3 n vo m ao O N 14 -i tp d C .-i ,-� .4 .-i J O. H 0 m -PO O O O N N o m 0 .-� O O en LOO .a 0 O to �n O n O �n m O c° m co a? Len M M co ko 0 tt1 t N h ko t0 N N � O CL OD co O OD n h �4 N N ttl m o o o 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0, 3 O O ct t0 tf) C7 .-4 C- N m N v? rd M 0 0 N N O •-� •�-� O tO N Q n .-i m tD td C N O m G W .4 Ln n m N Cn d an + d 4 t b N M Lo M N tp tt M U) n to h co : it N � O O L L. L �+ a m L E S1 � rd s N v E E O € -W n L U v � 7 CL 4 j •U L ui 0 C14 LO E O U 3:5 ca co0 O O O O O O O c to LO 'O 0 m N a ' C m n Z» N N Ar P�, O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O m .-� 0 O O 0 0 O '0 0 0 O O 0 c�a m m rn ;a m m O N m e m s LO 0 1 m O m to m n m 0 �pc. �pN m 0 c "N. . n N 0 0 Q, f- U O a W "0 0.:0 0 _0 O O O O O 0. O O 0. N n c w Q Os c N c 0. N ; N C -0 -O 0 07 co 'n 0 c ON n E c O t0 c O c 0 Q m m m d .•f N m m m 4' m ko n U 'y z u -c c m 0 n r+ c 1-4 m c N m co H a > S O+ OD 01 co c t0 N � �. 0 N M %0 ai H U CD m tn 'O � m rl 0 O a LO M m © C U .moi N M d 0 k n 0 CC p N -L, H n 0 co d1 O O O O N O O m m Ar t er LO O m •.+ O O Lf) O O co W m m .-� '-t rn C m N L O a n Lo �r N ui �o c 0 m c4• � m co w m .-+ n c 0 er n c -1 w 0 m H c n 0. m n n kO N m %o m tp CO c n 1:1 to LO e NC; c n •+ n O c c C 3 n c rt m a) n co M tr n Q+ ri C al M rr t4- CD O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U- O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O w O O c O MM � O 3 U) ,-� M N O N n m n 0 N O n c � � c O m LL) Lf) tD ca co m O • 4 m co 3.) m Cn i1) O c �o �o O m �[) C U va itT O •-� O -+ � rn O n c �r) rn m w Lf) m L Q m O m m N 04 rd 0 L � a w L L m L 0 N LB .N E 0 a - -0 � L )6 Ln C 3 = -+ n w Q E E C t w T 0 a a •.� a L L •. - O oD C M L 7t C ,.a 01 C. .4.) > U X co C 12 L O O)I C. M 3 3 3 a U. O 0 f•- 0( rd w � -� h L6 E ¢ Z: h r) ¢ cn 0 a o + h �- �w MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Library Board March 17, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Library DirectormcQq_'�to SUBJECT: Monthly Report -- February 1988 WCC'LS: The budget for WCC:LS is still under consideration. There has been no recommendation from the Budget Committee nor- from the Professional Board, Discussions are „still<going on in regard to reducing county--wide services in order to increase the pay--back to the cities for the library service to unincorporated areas. Structure and governance also is being reconsidered in that the Board of County .Commissioners- has said that they are willing to continue their role as sponsoring county agency, for the county-wide library <service. In order for ahem to be able to continue in that role, they are indicating that it will be necessary to greatly readjust the structure and governance that we now have, to include the formula, and it is expected that a very special committee will be appointed in the near future to consider these issues. WILI: A specialcommittee of computer user's in the county is codifying all the policies that have been established over the last year and a half for the operation of WILL. Also a schedule of special reports is being considered by each library so that more information can be gleaned from WILI each month. Community Contact: On February 24 the Library Director was invited to speak to the Tigard Kiwaniannes. The topic was "Good Books are Coining." This was a spring preview of some of the books that are coming out by favorite authors and by new authors. Volunteers: Forty regular volunteers contributed 421 hours to 1i.brar•y service, for a daily average of 19 hours. CE2 student spent 15 hours on job exploration. Three community service assignees worked a total of 34 hours. Library Board members gave 6 hours. Youth Services: School visits were conducted during the first week of the month at Fowler Junior High, Tuality Junior High, and the Tigard High School. This is part of our program to bring more teenagers into the library to do their homework and to do their reading. Our second annual pre--school fair was held on February 25, Fourteen local agencies were represented. It is estimated that 75-100 people came through during the four open hours. Our annual workshop on creative story--telling was presented to 22 students from Tigard High School, Jody Westerman, library assistant, organized and presented a program on child safety in two parts. The first session was on February 25 just for parents. The second session was on March 3, which included the children. 9 March 17, 1988 Page Two 1988 1987 1986 Work Indicators 631 6,508 Adult Materials 10,305 7,4 �6 7_§L 3,147 - Juvenile Materials 34 , Total 16,654 12,398 9,655 22 21.5 20 Days of Service - 757 577 483 Average,Daily Circulation 202 198 186 Hours of Service 63 60 82 Materials Circulated per Hour 8228% 11% Increase in Circulation 362 644 653 Materials Added/Withdrawn ' 653 362 387 Borrowers Registered 217 (12) 272 (13) 130 (9) Story 'Time (No. of Sessions) 57 (9) , 107 (13) 124 (6) ToddlerTime (No. of Sessions) Special Childrens Program (No. 22 (2) 0 0 of Sessions) 133 N/A N/A Personal computer Users ht/3717D 6 JJ � MEMORANDUM" CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON a�^ch 1,Honorable Mayor, Council 1988 TO; I /(; (L� & City Administrator ICY � !�tL• FROM: David C. Lehr, Chief- of Police it' U SUBJECT: February 1988 Monthly Report In February 1988, six Tigard police officers, along with officer's from several other police agencies, were certified as Hazardous Materials Technician I. This certification was the result of training ndat Provided bt e and State Police Fire Marshals office in a course sponsored by - - g Department. This is the .first certification of police officers in the state of Oregon as Hazardous Materials Technicians. Traffic enforcement, FIR contacts and and other contacts continues at a rate of about 300 percent over last year. The City has also experienced a major decline in residential burglary and robbery rates since this effort began. I am not yet willing to attribute reduced crime rates to productivity increases, but. Office Mike Knutson left: the Police Department to attend the eight week basic office Mike courseu at the BPST Academy in Monmouth. The Police department will trabe hiring Sheila Jackson ST March 1, Sheila will be our third female' patrol officer. Frankly, the novelty is wearing off, as it should. During the month of February, the 11-7 shirt on a routine assist call observed `' a restricted weapon on the person being assisted. Further investigation revealed' that the person was an ex—convict. He was arrested for being in and being an ex—convict possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in possession of a restricted weapon. Officers obtained a search warrant for a steamer trunk found in his car and seized the components of a meth lab. Officers also fired two individuals in possession of a pair, of vice grips with metal shavings on them. They were released at the time but subsequently from an inthe arrested when officersreceived removed and the els fell off lasdhelwas�at drivinglug nuts on his tires had b The PCSU completed three home security surveys in February. The unit did three pre—school stranger danger/officer friendly presentations. The Crime two presentations for service clubs in Tigard. Prevention Specialist did The Crime Prevention Specialist held four neighborhood watch organizational meetings in February. cs/3786D CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY flGENgFl OF: March 28, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: FebruaryT"251_1988 "ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution PREVIOUS ACTION: _Placed onto «cctnq Baldwin SanitarySewer maintenance guarantee period on Extension and authorizinq`assurance _ February 9, 1987. release. PREPARED BY: John Hagman DEPT HEAD OK`f)M/0 CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Community D v Dept. OL1:C:Y ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The project is located on SW Terrace Trails Drive, westerly of SW 115th Avenue (see attached vicinity 'map). 2. Construction of the 280' sanitary sewer main proceeded satisfactorily and all work withstood the maintenance guarantee period without fault. 3. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council act in accordance with the terms of the original project 'agreement, namely--accept the Tine for public operation and maintenance and _authorize release of the installer's maintenance assurance posting. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 11 Do not accept the line at this time, contrary to staff's recommendation. 2. Take action to accept the line at a later date. FISCAL IMPACT 1. Acceptance of the sewer line will obligate the City to assume operation and maintenance responsibility. SUGGESTED ACTION PASS THE RESOLUTION TITLED: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS THE BALDWIN SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION." ht/3422D 1 r CITY OF TIGARDL OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA 'ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 28, 1988DATE SUBmI,rfED: March 17, 1986 f ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: — PREVIOUS ACTION: M _ 4` Neighborhood Planning Organization 4 Appointments PREPARED BY Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD 0k CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY Manor's App'ts Adv. Com, �? :.. _ POLICY ISSUE^ Board and Committee Appointments F INFORMATION SUMMARY � f The Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee met on January 2.0, to interview 13 citizens who were interested in serving the City in an advisory capacity. At that time six people were recommended for appointment to N.P.O. 's and their y . names were submitted to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission u ' considered them at; their- February 23rd meeting. Those six individuals were confirmed for appointment to their respective N•P.O.'s and are as follows: '- NPO #3 Daniel Walsh Term expires 12/31/91 NPO #6 Denis Hackelman Term expires 12/31/91 Marcy Nodland Term expires 12/31/91 NPO #7 Russell Head Term expires 12/31/91 N k NPO #B Betsy Brinkley Term expires 12/31/91 g Mike Erickson Term expires 12/31/91 { ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED #1: Appointment of those individuals listed -above. 02: Do not appoint any of the individuals listed above. #3: Appointment of selected individuals listed above. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Recommend alternative #1, to support the Appointments Advisory Committee recommendations listed above. dc:3681D € r : _ f S • 5 x� S .4i r xg y x 1 - } � a , q LJ ,s • : k Y 3 s' WATI MM, ,,;:-�; its aY• , �� s � g �k2 i i f,�p yL4 �: xN 1' • / / f0,P 3 t �r r n' Y .1 }F 1 F } fi •i 4 J Y nC ft'St.:C 'rJ,Yti �?�'�i rf! �£�sl yt't t#�.-k ,�n•'i'i �` It.: s'Yfr_.0 ��`t�iiF x �1': }L YiL"•.�Ff a'�'STL4.._�•u 31f F_�.��y2 f%f t.'�' C a�'�f4 r��i _.' � I�i,�,ykrX¢t 'i: J ''��. $....r1,.,• 3t� -kms s r T- t :- .t;F. :<, ty, _r .� - E k22}.{ q,Fyu�s. , +• 3 f'a _ fit drrrd��ebt4l z�.- � � r z � ,' :a . . ..♦�. 1 �� i `ks-74ZA 'fit 3 x, � - Ali• � ;: ii ./ r. i'� . r• , .__ � Y 1 x� • ti � �NL r .► 1." .i•.L 1• I�.. i ��t+q >,' ly 1 ..' �. ►,1 lIs! ��± '4`� S'a . r �• Ct. i •. {Y Z{f4 >} F f ( A n jX "f 11 It N OWNS,% NW I SURE= - --- - ------- ....... ....... ....... ..................... 1 x.e:.. '`,.!�.� �a:.". ,,��,7� 5x.if'� f 1 a, n§ S ..��� t�..., e��.wr_,,....,'r. .,..<�. ..•.En to....._.L«. � .'xs � ?'_. .F2's._. ....y t x.`. ri11ED JAN 251988 CITY OF TIGARq CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION d ��a00-iaNtch K ear TuY'1 � DATE: i NAME: man crHONE,,SS* 5 5yREs. P ADDRFl -1a r OR V10 BUS. PHONE:- 222:12V) ADDRESS ADDRESS (B[S.): v 1t SUGGESTED BY: I.ENGT:! OF RESIDENCE IN.TIGPRD: Lb{4 V n 1 i 0'`� _®� Ct I. WHERE DID.YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? i11� T EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: J<11VG(5( 1 $ ! OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: SSI a.(I a -N11 i I aC cl�Uh HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH. THIS FIRM? �c2 of ItI `'.S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? yP1tEVI0US COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: Btu_ 4J ar ,�rr�gfar�, A1�'Err� o�cN o �c.r� 1 <rt ( fa- f, ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: (t OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REhtMS):I ! A110f i f �( . �u�e�?� Qdij IVL'LlpS� are irnir� (1/FC \n �" i COMmu " f m II__ „ _ � �f(Pa TI a- BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: ___------- Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed I � 0 -),/o PM Date APPointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City u Outside City P k t cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171- 01. CITYOFTIFARD fA RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION CITY;��� 2of SeMce 1961-1986 NAME: TSS t"-L �E�� DATE: 10 x d ADDRESS (RES.): RES. PHONE:.� -jxg0 p 6. ADDRESS (BUS.): ` 01 LJ c ck110v BUS. PHONE: �,�,3- 900 ` LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: L4WL,M�� SUGGESTED BY:. WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: �,aM>,OR+>5�'hQS�.�$-Y r.cS•} U� �O,r.c.c�r� &"�-• — HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH.THIS FIRM? 45 S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?. �o PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: Se—flA on LG,.x' �►n.;�A P OC}`2"` Ce " ov, ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: 5_k4 Q-a[� ,_ �� L Nneii I. c'\ OTHER INFORMATION (GENEAL REMARKS): 4 1& 2rti�k '� �c� eih SG t� �.� t�w iw,�J2 i c�i 3 wo...\ he c� G.�`_ Ryf o P�D.-;✓�c�r C Avv,-- 4o_ �,��,��..A � Sew--?+use. w•,�1•.'.� �h� CLac�, o� �� •A,� BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTEDy IN: C�cor•ec ����� �� � �5 �c Rte. nw cc�vi i.S o r\ Date received at City Hall .Date Interviewed Date Appointed II t J Board, Committee, or(& 7 ,.side City x Outside City (1172W) 113125 SW Holl Blvd.,PO.Box 23397,Tigard,aeon 97223 (503)639-4171 CCITYOFTKAND CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON NAME: `1�kIs DATE: _ j 7 ADDRESS (RES.):' � mJZ + RES. PHONE: 5'',ZLbG ADDRESS (BUS.): I h _ BUS. PHONE: 6aTnib LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: ro'b SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? �45aAe_yT%, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: mas+ irs hn' Lard ( nv-`?L4nninli ell cymoyv OCCUP TIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: hp ko ✓ t gA drt a t�► .� �t So lam GJ14 CZ HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? CJS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICJTS QNLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: % SQk:t, &9,1 V LID04 C IV Yl'ifr'10..�2Jt ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): iONE mmm r`�J� E>► __G SOi -- 130 AVIA m�lCdAc- ha c�i.�ecl ir► �� �r. odl tt�or�ww BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Kmr) R Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed 1 a 0 V,to PM Date Appointed 2// /000 Board, Committee, or NPO Lipo-4 $ Inside City Outside City cs/4772A 13125 SW Hall Blvd„P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 .(503)639-4171 -- UtC 1C, 1987 CITY OF, TIGARD. FLP,teil d DEM 1 F E INTEREST APPLICATION CITIZEN COMMYTTE IN pp OREGON j NAME: 6 C �S®1'1 - _ DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): p-7 S S.G,. (o9 ' STS' 'i 16�cD 3'RES. PHONE: � $-02-.x; ADDRESS (BUS.): -tJ GA,cdt Erej 0a�,L-r k }Aw I s-i S,_2r�a�� BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: r WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? +6 r-H 1,vt 1,vas A 1',-4:1 fl EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: (}� S. LA. P t AS t K ». OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: r-(& 62V S a --lit e 6 4 R l�s F r col f'►'d J 4p HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? t eery 54:11 worle�.e9 a�j--TI D• ' IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? � PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVYTY: Com un;�- �10 1vr� PC WUMercus ckc{l P5 �.S.(A — C ctaviso rti.,bo,4rA $(,-87 �. E` OR•AMIZATIONS AND OFFICES: S+U6et,)+ S.u. SZtf$7 �A-�ov►g, �s3..era.'�-- k2o.�y.d-l�bte_, w�sT coA�T��s�c�-�1¢. racy+s0.60lg OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS)e. 5}�4�w� Field Gcr-\ kicle-arT!uw`}•p—r P,5.Q, a S — R7 r ' A" Ores Win.,, yet-4, BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTEDr- �co.no.,e;� �eJe10 meK'}- r" t recrmikear\ ' Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed I D Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City x Outside City 1 cs/4772A 13125 SW Holl Blvd„P.G.Box 233973gcard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 281988 DATE SUBMIT'T'ED: March 21, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Supplemental PREVIOUS ACTION: Appropriation for Civic Center - Parkin Lot Ex ansion. PREPARED BY: Randall R Wooler DENT HEAD 0 nO CITY ADMIN OK !� REgUESTED BY E FF .._... .. __..._ .... _. _. POLICY ISSUE ' Shall,$80,000 be appropriated for construction of the Civic Center Parking lot ' expansion project? 4, f INFORMATION SUMMARY ' f Previously we reviewed with Council (in a study session) the plan for expansion of the Civic Center Parking Lot. Construction drawings are now complete and we are ready to advertise for bids. The estimated construction ' cost is $80,000 t. Before we can advertise for bids, funds for the project must be appropriated. � Attached is a resolution prepared by the Finance Director appropriating $80,000 for the project from Operating Contingency. E' ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Appropriate the necessary funds. 2. Direct that the project be modified. 3. Direct work to stop on the project. ?' s FISCAL IMPACT As described above. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the resolution appropriating the construction t funding. br/3804D , Afk§JPRE;=J:JJ111JJJ11J 1111113,11 101 1!11 11111111 i' P c CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL' AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 28, 1988 DATE SUBMITTf_D: March 21, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA-TITLE: USA Durham PREVIOUS ACTION: _ Facility Grounds Maintenance Agreement PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woolev ,, — DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POCTCY ISSUE Shall the City enter into an agreement for landscape maintenance of the Unifiedg Agency Sewerage Agenc Durham Facility? INFORMATION SUMMARY_.. An agreement has been prepared for City maintenance of landscaped areas at the USA Durham _Facility. For this service, USA would pay .the 'City $31,700 per year. Attached is a memo providing more details. A resolution has been prepared authorizing the Mayor to sign such an agreement. i ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED i 1. Approve the agreement. 2. Direct that the agreement be renegotiated. 3. Withhold approval. FISCAL IMPACT Additional net revenue to the City of approximately $4,500 per year and additional net service of 0.25 FTE to the maintenance of City facilities. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. r. br/380AD MEMORANDUM CITY OF-TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and Council March 21, 1988 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, Acting DirectorP/ f' Community Development P� SUBJECT: USA Durham Plant Landscaping Maintenance Contract ....E i 3 It is proposed that the City will provide general maintenance of ;landscaped 4 areas outside the plant fences at the Durham Facility of the Unified Sewerage Agency. This arrangement appears to be beneficial to both the City and the Agency.; G In order to provide this service, the City would need one additional full—time Parks employee plus certain other costs as outlined below: Employee Wages $14,856 Employee Benefits 5,167 Safety Equipment, Clothing Allowance & Training for Additional Employee 600 E 3. Fertilizer & Chemicals 3,200 Additional Operating Costs For Existing Equipment (fuel, repairs, & depreciation) 3,300 Total estimated cost to City $27,12.3 e The proposed FY1988-89 budget for, Parks includes the necessary expenditures for the proposed USA grounds maintenance. USA proposes to pay the City $31,700 per- year for this service. The City would benefit in two ways. First, the City would receive a net revenue of approximately $4,500 per year. Second, the City would have an additional Parks maintenance employee but only about 75% of the additional staff time would be required for the USA work. The remaining 25% of the t employee's time could be directed toward improved p park maintenance. Council approval of the attached contract is requested. r br/3804D t, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 88— A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILAUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY FOR GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AT THE DURHAM FACILITY. WHEREAS, an agreement has been preparedproviding for maintenance by the City of certain grounds 'areas at the Durham Facility of th 'lnified 'Sewerage Agency; and, WHEREAS, it appears to the Council that the proposed agreement would be w beneficial to the City. i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign, on 'behalf of the City, an agreement with Unified Sewerage Agency for grounds maintenance at the Durham Facility. j PASSED: This day of 1988. I ATTEST• Mayor — City of Tigard t Deputy'City Recorder - City of Tigard APPRO :D AS TO FORM: ity Recorder g .Dat lw/3804D RESOLUTION NO, 88' D R A F T Intergovernmental Agreement City of Tigard and Unified Sewerage Agency - Unified Sewerage Agency Durham Facility Grounds Maintenance 1. This Agreement is between the City of Tigard and Unified Sewerage Agency, both Oregon municipal corporations, referred to as "City" and "Agency", respectively. The , parties have authority to enter into agreements pursuant to ORS Chapter 190. ; 2. The Agency owns and operates a facility known as the Durham Advanced' Wastewater Treatment Plant, "Durham Facility", located within the City. The Durham Facility is in need of periodic maintenance of its grounds and landscaping. 3. The City has 'adequate personnel and equipment to maintain the grounds and landscaping of the Durham Facility, as well as its own property. Now, _therefore, ,the parties agree as follows: 4. The City shall perform grounds care and maintenance activities at Agency's Durham Facility accordingto the Scope of Work contained in Exhibit "A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. A map of the Durham Facility is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. A map of the Durham Facility,is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 5. The Agency shall pay City for such services in the amount of 01,700 per year, in equal monthly payments. City shall submit invoices for such payments, and Agency shall make payment within 30 days of receipt. 6. City shall utilize its own employees and equipment to perform the work. City shall be responsible to pay, insure, and supervise the employees, and shall supply all fuel and maintenance for the equipment. Any waste material produced by the work shall be properly disposed of by City at its expense. 7. The term of this Agreement shall be one year. It may be renewed for a like term by agreement of the parties. This Agreement may be canceled by either party upon 30 days written notice to the other, addressed to the City's Community Development Director, or the East Basin Division Manager, respectively. S. Each party shall be responsible for the claims, demands or lawsuits arising out of the actions, negligent or otherwise, of its employees, instituted by any person. Each party shall maintain sufficient insurance to cover such risks or shall maintain a program of self—insurance therefor. Intergovernmental Agreement City of Tigard and Unified Sewerage Agency ; Page 2 9. In the event this Agreement is cancelled, Agency shall pay 'City the portion of the contract price earned to the date of such cancellation. 10. The following items are outside the scope of this Agreement: irrigation; , replacement of any damaged landscape material; bark or other mulch; planting of annuals, shrubs, or trees; pest control such as mole or beehive control. - The parties may agree to include one or more of these items in the scope of work by adopting an amendment to this Agreement. 11. Agency may request mowing at greater frequency than shown in Exhibit "A". Agency shall pay City an additional sum of $625.00 for each time that mowing is performed outside the schedule shown in Exhibit "A" City of Tigard Unified Sewerage Agency Authorized by Resolution No. 88- By: By. Titles Title: - Dater Date: Approved as to form: Approved as to form: Legal Counsel Legal Counsel br/3705D x i�h # p :h � r t y* Y.:v to y: z Y`f 1 . 9, ONE SON N x�* e � k d • ®®® K, e 7Ak k r a f NoElmME MEN •+F a. �� Y • ■■ ■■ ,may Y ' No , � s t rS r� 5 N'. �z £�*3 No■■r X4.5 P � No t r-: atp v rr " r t y E)vc rsl 1edOMMY,, KttLn iii iiI II► iii Iii iii iii Bio II! ►ir s!i III ii! !� T t I ! i 1 7 i i it 1- � ! � IIIIII 1 � I ! c I. � - ( �fmTm� i.Pi � r�Rr� i 1.'1 ' NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -- - ._..i 2 .� 4 _ �j - $ iQ . . �!.. . _... 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. os sz ez cz az sz vz �or��NlN��i,Nduu�nulm��aulat��tin,)pi i U,illil�iii MARCH 7 . ; , 1990 _ ._ -- ----------------- g� g' d r� °o Q Z ZI �•, � �i r" o , 3LL HA N wl0. t i w w.ro xoG.wG.i EXHIBIT ..B.. I �` - u„e.,o.�.�•yen I rmquTv, _ L AREA COVERED BY GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT . .5 13 N E 21y000 ` 0f5 I - . I cc w eo.+Trax sTauenae� I \ i ly! v.2 ' 3 •=e acuw+s/sLu �\ THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN REDUCED - ,\ APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF SCALE •,9 , \VC`�\` d WASTE U_ME SLUDGE ``\ - r [EltrulQ � ` �OjV \ STATION �\ ``\..� 4r'I'BIIr�G 0 \ A� Z � Z: Z Q —°"`°"a Yeteren�Thomp�oa& UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY SITE PLAN - - .. no3 i•=oo' IS +rt 'In /Pwm• DURHAM WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Da J Ls we P760.042-- 12392 ••^ •• G 33 ti w, �{f�t�►�I{fall fif�f{f yell+ +Ol�tll IIS L1+ 11+Jiff 7 m m Ili II 1 1 f I f I III nl X77 i I7 �7T DRAWING IS +'1"'� 1 ..1.'_ t''l�� I �.{ l'I I��Illll�flr�ll+�lll�lll�ll+illi�Jlf�l h'il+�lll�ll 11-►�II+IIIf,flflfit�llf�e'f'F11 •. J NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED '— --.- .�.. � 2 3 4 _-- _ 5 � 6- 7 8 9 0 LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE• IT IS DUE TO TFE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL _ _ DRAWING. OE 62 B2 L2 82 52 b2 EZ ZZ 12 OZ 6t BI -LI _91 Sf' bl EI Zi 11 01 --W- MARCH 6® ru 7 . , , 199® CITY OF TIGARD,:OREGON COUNCIL-AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March _h 28, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: March 2.1 1.988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Streets CIP PREVIOUS ACTION: Revision `- PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley. / GGUCf I Y ADMIN REQUESTED BY:HEAD Qu GC PO ICY ISSUE Shall the Streets capital Improvement Program be revised to add transportation planning projects for Northeast Bull Mountain area and for City Center access? INFORMATION SUMMARY On February 1, 1988, the Council approved a revision of the Streets C'iP program (p. 136 of the 1987-88, Budget). ; The Tiedeman Avenue Realignment project was deleted from the "FY 1986-87 Work in Progress" list, thereby freeing up $157,000 for other projects. Two projects were added to the, CIP list in February: North Dakota Shoulder construction ($50,000) and Ash Avenue at Cresmer Drive ($10,000). This leaves $97,000 not yet assigned to new projects. In the February workshop meeting between Council and the Transportation Advisory Committee, two new transportation planning projects were discussed. The Northeast Bull Mountain Study is intended to identify the alignments of collector roadways to connect Walnut Street, : Bull Mountain Road, and Gaarde Street.. This work is urgently needed to assure creation of the necessary road system as the area develops. The proposed study budget is $20,000. The City Center Access Study is proposed to complement planning work of the City Center Plan Task Force. The project would evaluate _engineering alternatives for major access between the Cascade Blvd./Washington Square area and the Main Street area. It would also <look at traffic circulation in the City Center area. The proposed budget is $40,000. It is proposed that the two transportation planning study projects be added to the Streets CIP list, using a portion of the f=unding available from the previous deletion of the Tiedeman project. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve revisions to the Streets CIP as proposed. 2. Modify the proposal. 3. Take no action. _._.,..._._.._.,,_._...-_______..._.�..__........�_.-..._.. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated above. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that the Council, by motion, approve revisions to the 1987-88 Streets CIP by addition of the Northeast Bull Mountain Study ($20,000) and the City Center Access Study ($40,000). br/3804D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 28, 1,988 DATE SUBMITTED: March 18 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA-TITLE: Training PREVIOUS ACTION: Request - D Lehr - Police Executive Devel�CITY Workshop PREPARED BY: D. Lehr DEPT HEAD OK IN OK4& QUESTED BY: D. Lehr INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard Police Department has initiated a strung training program within the department over the last two year's. We have taken advantage of every non-cost training opportunity available to us. We have also used training funds to train officers in areas of departmental need. In fact, we have developed a training by objectives 'philosophy toward training. That is, we send people to schools based on developing their skills and career's to meet departmental and community needs. Executive Development is often neglected in a Police Department. Managers too often' do not take advantage of training opportunities to develop and/or enhance managerial and leadership skills. I have had only one ,real opportunity in the two years I have been here to be involved in ,an in-depth managerial/leadership skills development course. I believe it is critical that I maintain skills and develop new skills in a rapidly changing environment. The Police Executive Development course at IPTM will offer a curriculum particularly suited to my; and the department needs. (Please see the course description). -ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the request, 2. Deny the request. - _ — FISCAL IMPACT 1. -0- 2, $1,199 —- SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the request. sb/3791D C1 TIVARD EDUCATION/TRAININGREQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, ,n' copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be'placed, in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: 3-18-88 Requested by: Chief Lehr Vendor No.: 1 PAYABLE TO: Institute of Police Technology & ( X J Employee request attend c/o Director,' IPTM Management [ j Employer required attend Uniersitv of North Florida For check run of 4567 St. Johns Bluff Rd., S. [X J Mail check w/ attached registration Jacksonville, FL 32216 [ ] Notify dept. when ready form Vendor No Vendor No.: PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: msassssmassssaassasaassssssamemassssassasssacaaasrsaaassasaaasmmasasaaassmsssss Title of Program: Police Executive Development Worksho Institution or organization Institute o Po ice Technology & Management Registration Deadline Training Dates From: 4 25 To: 4 29 88 Describe the purpose: Tt help the police executive survive by offering topics such as Management of Change; Effective Delegation; Productivity; Time Management; Communication Skills; and the Executive and the Media. Is this related to fxxJ current position [ ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: It is important for Chief Lehr to be able to maintain and develop managerial and leadership skills. TRAINING COSTS: ( ] to be'advanced [ J to be reimbursed of ter attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition.......................... 10-1120-62500 350.00*to be mailed Books........................................... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... i 128-662400 250.00 *will use VISA. Lodging......................................... 10-1120-62400 323.00 *will use VISA. Per Diem........................................ 10-1129-62T= 7� 6.00 *will use VISA. Other: (ground transportation) 10-1120-62400 100.00 *will use VISA. Total $ 1,199.00 msmsssssssmaasasaasaamaaassaaaasxssassxasacacscsacssxcmsoasasasaasasassanaaaaaa Authorizations: I(empl yee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training pol ies a not e , I may be required to reimburse the City for any expendit s mad m all. F cm to ee Signature: i v Date c�a r10 p y -�� xs J S �' ��y /1 yzc:, 2-7 Appropriatio al ance: Manager: [ J approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Head: [ approved ( ] disapproved (explbin): 96 e Finance Director: roc 0 Z caCi � ycU) mro ro12 YQ - "' og ? a0) m j � Y � � � ' a -0o6 'a -rn -oEm 2 o y m W. O � .0 a.-:.. c Lo 7.._ p O p O _O C..p'ro:E E O) N L E C.T O d) Z =.T m X 0 0 .0 'D CO M N`U) a al -- p..�.. O � O �p_� C ® 7 - mu. -p .� v � ' C o Y. - o . Cc V_YQ '3 N0 .:LLQ :.o .:(Cd. UOL5., y ca.� ° T C:N p ' N -.:C p 0 0 C V p 0.� ccd .L0 US ca°-° °D °'� o aa'ic°- � � oo� � NEcEo � o � 3ca ro � � �c � U) ¢ � ro � °' � = C v �L �o a) 0a '� c° oE c0N � r -N Q U "ro _ to� o O '7 C ._ «f N Y E.T d O Q T �:C .= •�•Y. Q 0 m.''S = om � 0 °� N 0)LO E W � � a> mc � m > nQ � r� = � oEO '72 Q o E Q _.- . CM m e co rnid c � o 0 yjp ° o . m NO2v � a�im � NQ � m � aoi � rno � � � a _ Q EYro � > cvnc aci) - CLco � a0 rn vita - C _ � Co j- �om Q� :3 C: ia-a ovaio � am coo mroc`an pcY�O � ro `osm, ° tJ l F- ) c -o(L Q Q H Z 2 E r 22Q0a (An -� aOwtt30 f- o� � 2 o a o t U B d e wo _ V e tM g o 3o B o: Institute of Police Technology and Management University of North Florida REGISTRATION FORM Name: David C. Lehr Position/'Title: Chief of Police Telephone: ( 50) 639-6168 Ext. 219 Mailing Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. } Organization: Tigard Police Department OR Zi 97223 City: Tigard State: P I: Course Information: ` Course Title: POLICE EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP Return to: Director, IPTM University of North Florida Course Date: := APRIL 25-29, 1988; St. Augustine, FL 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road, S. ❑ AUGUST 15-19, 1988; Miami, FIL Jacksonville, Florida 32216 Course Fes: $350 Telephone: (904) 646-2722 ; p Authorizing Official Make checks payable to: Institute of Police Technology and Management - Autho g , Name: David C. Lehr Position(ritle: chief of Po]i rn ❑ Send Invoice to: Purchase Order Number: or tc Fee enclosed E' m Y O m m o o 16 c «V. L o 5 C � N N E � N co 0 Q 'w N N L p m 3sacw cE0= w E mv - 2 c � - 'C' r ~ n > v c m H m E td E o° > r o m aai o m E rod d o m m ro 3 m m N c d o -j m ca m (A cL C y C C O) c 2 W m N 3 C CL'UD)'ll E C_ ~ '° ¢ tN O1 t 0 l0 m O ro a tp N L t C 8 00-'00 caU o. N R L m m ° c q m w m r ® co m o o -r .c ro x E m ro E 0 3 ,-57 E ° E 3 w ' = cm EE � M «i $ oxo mE moC 'Emao `oma ° ° � �° mm � « 'com E L E m �' m a m a- xsA Ev m m o 0 > M 0 my c o ° a _o cmi t o 0 x L O«ro. m �= ro J L a V .. ,°� .0 ` _ « id . y 7 C E N r N °'; N .0 o •3 N o CO ,7 W L ° a i !n N U O C Z m N C = ° .m.. _ U N CDL m 3 CL °,o c o :110 ; mro a c :° o ¢ E '9 ° a�n° 'u m z m �- n r 15 0 9 m o m m m L O V 0. w A'° X J C m C ® 7 V ro L O p t m C « c p O y C « j 'E L C . of ° E M'3 w ro N T y a Y E o° ¢ co Ui w b > E d « . m o m e 3 0 pm c ® m me am m x v ° ®,q .2 tvm mm 's ro mmmmco .n �. x N d>L w N i C H cca C ® C, 7 C o w :C J V G° 3 7 m m .�"' d C� O Y N O U m 0 0 0 lE`0 Y mL m .o L° > � v C• °'m a � v c m ° zm3 3 cr Nod t m cm o ro o' eP 3 o rn�6 r o e E N c m e O W m m e ? » O m ca e Y N O 3 ' > o v ° io o n m c rn m c y !? c°i .° m m c 0 m ro o 3 °�m a g m x m ' ca m a o N y a m rom aroE 0yms o me E a3 mwn O m � ro 0 - am Q >. o2 w q L UO E o 0 Y,C O m W O t ` W LL O 3 A« m N m N « ro m 6 U « r� v mm�H o v No Evrigm c mcm cc � � nvc m •o ° mc 3 a ro , 3 �' Ecro ._ mc E 5tm � m ro c 3 > COCoO mvcU � oC m 0) m .X O m `-- _,O m `O F &q C aro N C O O ro 0 a�. ro N m U1 0) m C m v L a L i a 'E m L m 0 O A m v mia E 7CeOCL CO 07C0 _ C x E N 0 O m ca _m ° mco COCD N 0O ro ° ' mm 0 : mLo0 0 mm MG -V 0 � ra C, W rnvv 0 ECcCOp O '-'O « m - °« I- p o w m 0 ° E o m S0 E L. m Om Y m m iO moaO O U aV8 « a N 4 t ID e C� W v r CIS A4 ;04 FT� cn roux as Ca 0-4Ca Y � c� � Z P� °moo E-4 f�a N' 0.p 0 Institute of Police Non-Profit Technology and Organization Management U.S.Postage UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA Paid MEMO 458757.JOHNS BLUFF ROAD,S .laoi(sanVll{©,Florida JACKSONVILLE,FLORIDA 72216 Permit No.t I p FN1 'cc -O 'C � N O n.N O O� aa) C EO L=r a) ®?eL. co a) cL ro ro o "- C. (0)o >0 o cmi ro� 3 3v.>y_v 3 o c c o N a 3 cro � NNC (6 ro tnNN �LroC orov'Y (� ro >_ c C cEcp ° ° -mN ro - �t- ai � N °LAN 0)o 6!3 t_- > w c� N Z N,a c c a•U co ro Y '' Dco oEc._ c8 orJJUN � Tin c0)Nvro (d > ` ro ro�ca ® ® C N C•a) a) U C > ,r C ro'N'a ro N N_ ro o f •p ,- W Q)• OOEO0p yCN U0)a �_ EwR.2 , N >.O ANN J < l� > . QNCa)2C' a)',0: OEcL pCC ° ONa)CNa) m ro CC ll ��N p SIA alC o C C.ro CL a) N w C.� Tp ro.�-• ro C p O rn W— ro ro L 'a to aR ° (a—-° a C a) l0.�., t0 N•a "O N O,X N ° E LOC '� 7'C V U. V c CL c•a c� c c N o o rnp E N c a) N EN c w 0 ® ® ILO V ro0c `" � NErn to (DSCa)Co. oro =U)op:�U�2 2 15) �ZLLv !- 0)x c cE ° N 3 p o E a) n o(�' >v A Co C CL N °�°�� LU04 Nmm.Sro � `wEov a�W � c� Ey � co. 0)ro , c? ° ;- a.. c-a 2! a >'p= U U N C-c c 2 2, C-1) > > c o o'rn-' C N F- N'a aN- R3 C C ;"w-•- O 3 a� C 0 Q) C� � C.C.LO •C o lJ• tflo� E • 00 ~ W O N'0 3.� ro d C N L U U:'d 0 6 N V) tj E N N� CCN ° a_1 `N U Q C� U p: �� U + ro 9dA m 'o 2 acio rn Co.. aNA Z y o U inm °-u) 3: oL o ac) y � « u. NroEroc- ° g ro ° N U occa)5 -° 0) r — •C Q) .-• a g) C >. Cwt✓ N Q. E - y a)ro N a) a) Z c.0 2; _ ° L o co aw'a E xaccoi H N U o E ° o•'> N o-- o N o h- o� Ec°� E' F UEro.r.-. Nro A o° C�inSaE :E*00' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF March 28, 1988 DATE SUBMI'ECED: March 17.1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Training Request_ PREVIOUS ACTION: none . National Main Street Center`. Creating Economic-0 ori: niter on Main Stre PREPARED BY: Elizabeth. Ann Newton DEPT MEAD OKl �CITY ADMIN OKtREQUESTED BYCouncilor Johnson i r POLIO ISSUEr Council approval is required of any training request that is over $500 or, 500 miles from the City and not specifically identified in the current FY adopted budget. INFORMATION SUMMARY r; The Senior Planner with lead responsibility for the Planning Projects Division is also the Project. Manager for the City Center Plan. With the departure of the Community Development Director, the Senior Planner is responsible to coordinate Council concerns, consultant report results, and City Center- Task Force issues into the development of a plan. In addition, the Senior•, Planner will be responsible to, the new Community Development Director for identification of City Center Plan issues as they r'el'ate to the development of the plan document. The conference agenda deals with issues relevant to Tigard's City .Center such as economics, attracting ,and enhancing business and attracting reinvestment. A copy of the conference program is attached. _ 'ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED _ 1. Approve- the Senior Planner's attendance at the National Main Street Center Conference titled "Creating Economic Opportunity on Main Street" ;' in Sari Diego, California from April 25-28, at an -estimated cost of $1,038.70. . c 2. Deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT The Planning Division budget for FY 1987-88 does not contain funds to suuport the City Center Plan. Expenditures to support that effort have been considered on an as requested basis. The Planning Division training budget r does not contain sufficient unencumbered funds to cover this request. _ ~+ SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the request to send the Senior Planner to the National Main Street Conference titled "Creating Economic Opportunity on Main Street". ke/3813D -PlM -MIR I -- - _ o 0 - - National Main Street Center Nonprofit Org. ; National Trust for Historic Preservation ' u.S.Postage 1785 Massachusetts Avenue,N.W PAJO it Washington,D.C.20035 SYashington,D.C. Permit No.8803 c,1 _:r7. r, 'T' - 1 _ TP� c T 7 >` 3 s' C g EE n c u m. Z c d o a��i o O L) E .c' o "n o w z U o C U O a o E p v " U Ij o h o ,`eU v OO QO Q .ru. � 0 �r> jaNU v Ov U �o cn � (,Cn va7+ t ZC <- a En Rr o L c a o In o v N E z_o o E o t U o E E m o o f c n r� m on _ o E n G p C 1 E c E ° U > E E N E .� i C '� _ ❑ - c o c ._ o v c E G o — ¢ .0 .'t.. O N N O v iy O C <' °' v .� a P. "_ O CL .. w .O .�'.. �. C U -C , ea j U U ? Q �c U (} U m U F n h o y ZZ n 0 C v c I c c Z5 iiiZ ? CIUF• r rv'i m t •2 7. tx � 4i 40 hBo v V O 13d! u u .-, °" N g,•«� O Q at.Ly.p o " gu % ~ u w`�•�•� e1, °�y q . o Jw o s a o p � .� o ° C 3 °op �: p O N 'gyp N 3 `«-dN h 0 ep ND •'. q ° u �'' « d O « > o Eb+•d� a .N, d, ro m � 01.0 0.4 ai " Fi `+• N 3. w 00 « eL w... $. u °, i7+ .Cp u "'d' V. p n d 0u'".•�v yP�,.:VuuN a�,Xa_0.,1 q .a��u:...'5 Ew.. '«ti•�'ua " ���" oq ON J. dUUu N>o'o �ONCNi. �•bO�y w(4V°L��'"1.+v�.".��Cy'.O -SMw 24 otd ;I *WT ". Ny ~ V c V +y p -Z, �'d ° . y b1w° ' Or O ° pU "'oNa. u — 00 y o uA0 "Vo p -0 '•«aU�u�vg, . .wdp ; rf .. v uau w + � •P4 uu V � u eo > y NN � ° o, LWq N A [.0moj04 0, ' x 0os v �~ab•.«v w coi •guu, i u u v oa pay .. ro- N Z -2 4 3td0 w bae r. cd v o' 6b m F .u. a`3 O w .°. { bo q OA b p a y N .-> r. G "" Uvs. 0aN°�3Cid1-q«>N' .rooUu,.'d1«°��u« ;?~.��ty`��wy�rq'}���°`�.p��ug >v�iba�O'+aade.'�v"oa�c4..�q. y.wuP«,��«+.•adopv. �3«�d Api 6 '•lci ho�ttAyyO��..'".5 ��dN>�<++'�`�w•A«'�d°cq�t.�Vo n _i C a tb ^ 0a v pA 3 'a m m> o os d -0 ON -a ° N > . 0 Eaoaw O C� q - ^ O o a+ « y co �•�•a"°figa"'+' twO CN da . %. ° Pq ° c N •b N io-0 ° u gp ` cc o 0 co 5. —.q�p u0 0 ° > ouOuCau % u � weyo�Rv O A cO ° TM3A �qu o ss '� Q $ � o 'mav ud > q a. .°. �� o &Lu «Cr 'UU ti ni « N ® N �.,aN y.'� .U. ° y ead 'O in ed .«i 5 w S .0 A A e6 O r•�e w $. boo q bo as G p a m 00 3 N q � xx W •� o � u � N a�s ° o. A W i° Q q w E~WAaae 24 00 �ooNN, ap!J ."bVoVd+) CN.'�.y«a„•. •oN�tVsd. {�°aa]+!.a�t'.ad7+ cd uNNT. «Ni «li dN' ' .O „.O •A0 Cl «ub �•'«0.w. uTN'^Nu.g�7,y7r! •,e�bdy0) sUma�'+!) .rOMU,, «Or- o O a) o °pvo -0 Tl v ° � a, „ O N woo41 U U u u> o dI • � .�XW .N- « M « S 4)l0 E 00 .40, cqO u p� •o O N .0 f+ d «Q My rh w d M O h VpU E+ Qj g p m.... U•a .p V O •N+ H "�+ 'n V V U w p •�! W .� 'd fr Ri N N w w .U. « C cd H O �. id a 47 o w o w u '« « cUi a y a •.� a a ° o td to N « cd p a s >y eo >, oro o a O rov y Ca q O u nt u y 'u ' •� Q^ U.r.. M 4! U M O N N ^. �❑y u'� ,o«~ .•«,a; Ua°.q>N.Oya, N gGu:l '9N -O N cd u ' •.PNri''+o�J N w O toe. W -q OR a > pp :3 qO z: o $ pu � s - 5 a 0 o ,,, v3 ao >> ` uw o O 3 H G+ �3q u .q•`.•TC..VG7N> vGid7C•vCg�'�yoU"' y:N° " 0 -0 b� c. .�...0•_ .QOp.mo$ wU°VU' N > ° p to C' ° •�Ov" $g y 'qO O a a oo oo o. N bo o ° h .5cd czqv G , N uv uo Ua 0 cu > u . �yM y N tel. TJ `� u 0 (Ay N •. I C �, � o cc o p vto O p ° �� 13. Ndp O A p 00 6 v .M .7 > Gb q °moi a 9 p a i a aI o r .�a 3 �°n y ej p • v aw !J ViaA a v"iaoa « p C00 a3 0 ,'�� .. u d o a u o to ba r. C3 oo q67 appo m O pe° ,q M .w �j � °ice 6 �" n� W P°a HQ a PG td Cly Eo `Q 08w t. Ao V U M n zCL V 4 a yy y t co co w 3 A w C d ci F �, ®.. Q p � S e 3 p a o ,9 o o .4 N w bo 103 �tt77a6U0 w y qp p N bo .u q 4 �j2 m as v bo Q" A v w a ?L '� p e0 q b C « ;.n b A 0 p cs 00 :mom m. o � W � •�-� °� W W 04 W 'm a � .� W � •�� «pp L91 ci Go 6 yya a a p q •o o � a 0u a E v a A � .04 bo bo 93 U uu Zvi 4a A. .s° r �.' aA aGa Jr,- U C69 94 y� M spy 0. � � ci. "�3 au° Yw : wb U- w w . qq O �U• CwL' uw°i« '�aO y�qC.'�.!U'') w ^'�ww"� uMw ... ww o � Et x " a't' p M tyC u 0 m o u oa o o w o'O u o M 9 3 b E° Q R. ¢U L o 9 q qtcyuu..w®C.maQrisu:'m.ncQ�3'd$a°u u�U�Oua. Uy°wa'.yo-�q�.�oN"'. �v°•aubu uo 9cu;.•«��au a;ppw...awo � ..wa`0�`ucns Qwa cR,' x3oo.a. q�qw C°S u 3u.u)..�wp. � n �'$c a3.u�•F.o.�'Stio C:N ydVppO 0Gi aooy cO a 0 1u0 m ° pxjw72 o Ww c !°EvoS-a Ua 0:2 u t'u0a.2f. ru0, Q -p . V� LM.« yua E . � r� max` T� aGo o O 00 0� v yy � a q to M N R, Hoc o v o woo U ue u`l„ , 00 00 o N ®600 �.� rn � ... ..... .......... ... .. ........ ... ...... .. Go 0000 00 MI 0 4 g _ a eo ..0000 o_, u 8 ° w app (9 up' pp EZ N ..Q a w A c 3° 30 u o 'mow'a 3U” 4 4 ,00 N N 10 A W • e� IV �0? E �wMaa �,p. b" V •OL• U O "q' u.7 Psi LL C 2 wN +o u aBootr ntto x o p Av A id4�. b�C ..V..:u ago.ev a o p, q G au p0 q� u� ��,I 3 0— I 101, a°u 21 to ,a 0 6uU.�a"�U' V�.'fwu��" o o`� xpl^sW«wPwtVd.Cro'�.tW�c't ❑~Tt��-l.V w dZ atir7. �Jum °oa o n x aRaeo � vNOWto 1 fsAmoiu `w Xuo n0. 000 ' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 20 z ❑ ❑ ❑ a»" - ❑ ❑ u eO o O U z H O U p U ffi w g wwaa h ........................................................................................................... ......................................... ' o S aj M N cr� ewq 'b O V O CS al m .A.. U Y�..4' V N p 0 a ua7uvOwvo«ue...�A'/ns�app� .•ber�E�amOu t349r �''F'SmhCoo,t",.:—•h�uw.a ��EqaaNai ~Mmuvp..0.yN y�oVta�"' ;Aoto>v,0;�:uw»�•i°Y>usG Q�.Htamo.i Acoa4,.'�QmGw Am°vaG� MpC.a7.it eO0v.O co.M.:.64:1' »�.M.e.,„wu�yv" luu?vyNF0.' w'Q�P.t Ou�ww° NO ^L ° " 00 NhO OWN y- • C O Q 0 3 pp C O U A cv,uw,,.�au,•V.•,, „tt�o ao aV00Na «uvuwaV�'mOwoOao Y'a=uia=�c• .c or- cn be v Ns z C o ecato 0 o N s ra zuo go o 00 -6-4jN '0 a 0sPpwoo2 (Uv Z22 cv Zo to ewiw w WVu O ^ pi M w O WV p m wuw Z + a ° Cc) MA ? w ao w Q.0 a Z «t. .c 0UQ ° Co 00-C © Ln C6 ca N � a. o o ' to 42 � < Z 0 oao - ar u ouc paNa� O ': EoN a F U-t 4« co7G' .°O trCON w o V bv � 0 cc, M� O�. ' w V'D V V O " v >. 4' z V 4 C..• c�a O ti cq N w N 'A•' T U �. .0 U `� k au ° 5. —m eo Oo �ao— o VA VM � V MM • 0NU GU " b co 3q a 0 1 0 9 0aC i f CITYOFTIFARD EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other 3 ion. Documentation is required, a copy is forms of Bather training or educat 9 to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: V21188 Requested by: Elizabeth Newton Vendor No.: ��- PAYABLE TO: .rLa1reet Center [ ] Employee request attend Na l 2315+ :c Preservation (X ] Employer required attend ,oma GS�..►,,. a�rG Ayg For check run of 4/1/88 4a gan A` 6i [ ] Mail check [X ] Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : (2) Vendor No.: (3) PAYABLE TO: �ar;f; Travel PAYABLE TO:Elizabeth A. _Newton _ 11505P�cific Hwv 7550 SW Scholls Fy. Rd. D-10 >Tigard. Or972-23 i Beaverton, OR 97005 Vendor No.: (4) SEE ATTACHED PAGE `-- ----------------- ___=_------- --------___=____- _--------- ------- Title of Program: Creating-Economic Opportunity on Main Street Institution or organization National Main Street Conference Registration Deadline 3/29/88 Training Dates From: 4 26 88_To: -4 8 Describe the purpose: The conference is_designed to benefit those just starting development programs as well as experienced professionals who want to augment or refine their skills. Is this related to [X ] current position [ ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: [ X] to be advanced [ - ] to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... 10 2- (1) Books........................................... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... - - v (2) Lodging......................................... 10-223-6221 (4) Per Diem........................................ _10-223-624_ 90.00 (3) Other: rah/far 10-223-624 25.00 (3) Total $ 1,038.70 Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures ma on my be f.f Employee Signature: ' Date • G r0-&2-3-U,L`t--2.f .45 r Appropriatiocy lance: 12,., Manager: 1 , approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Head: '-1-1 approved [ ] disapproved (explain): /',.'/77,T,-(7 77777741 t/•l'f l//•E' y i Finance Director: C Vendor No-:4 The Westgate Hotel 1055 Second Ave. San Diego, Ca 92101 _i ENRON= CITY OF TIGARD,,OREGON � COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 26, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED March 21, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: MACC PREVIOUS ACTION: 3/14/88 Council Amendment To Inter overnmental _.ApprovedResolution No. 88-7.2 Agreement With MemberJurisdictions PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT MEAD OK CITY ADMIN O J REQUESTED BY: Bob Jean POLICY ISSUE Shall the City continue to -administer cable TV franchises through_ MACC? If so, shall the City consent to amend Resolution No. 88-22 to allow for distribution of the 5% franchise fee amount as currently dune? INFORMA�FION SUMMARY On 3/14/88, the Tigard City Council approved Resolution No. 88-22 which: 1. consented to the transfer of the franchise from Tidel to Willamette; 2. consented to a change in control of Willamette; 3. authorized amendment of the MACC franchise agreement; 4. authorized memorandum ofunderstanding with Willamette; and 5. authorized change of distribution of 5% franchise fee from 60% City and 40% MACC to 52-1/2% City, 30% MACC, and 17-1/2% Community Access �, support. As in the past, every,member jurisdiction must agree to the same terms. At a recent Lake Oswego Council meeting, they declined to change the distribution of the franchise fee from the current 60/40 split. MACC has determined that in order to keep the franchise transfer on schedule, other jurisdictions should be presented with a resolution which would reaffirm the 60/40 split in franchise distribution. (See City Attorney's 3/17/88 memorandum attached.) .,�,_, _.,____�....______.-.•---ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Consent to MACC suggested reaffirmation of the 60/40 split in franchise distribution. 2. Withdraw from MACC ad negotiate a separate franchise. SUGGESTED ACTION. Alternative #1 — Motion to approve Resolution. lw/3822D O'®UNNELL. RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW l ATTORNEYS AT LAIN 1727 N.W.HOYT STREET PORTLAND.OREGON 97209 1503)222-4402 DATE March 17, 1988 TO Tigard City Co99--Office FROM Tigard City At RE Metropolitan Area Communications Commission Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement At its meeting of March 14, 1988, the City Council passed Resolution No. 88-22-which, in addition to consenting to the transfer of the cable television franchise administered by the Metropolitan Area Communication commission,' authorized the amend- ment of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement of MACC's member jurisdictions. One of the proposed amendments to the intergovernmental agreement would have changed the distribution of franchise fees between MACC and its member jurisdictions. Currently, 40% of the franchise fee collected from the cable operator is retained by MACC and the remaining 60% is distributed to thememberjurisdictions pursuant to a formula based upon the revenues generated within the juris- dictional boundaries, etc. The proposed change in the distribution formula would have reduced MACC's percentage of the franchise fee to 30%, ,reduced the member jurisdictions' percentage to 52.5%, and would have devoted the resulting 17.5% of the franchise' fee,to MACC's operation of access and local origination programming. (MACC is taking over these operations in conjunction with the transfer of the franchise. ) At its meeting on March 15, 1988, the Lake Oswego City Council approved the transfer of the franchise and the related documents, but refused to pass the amendment that would reduce the member jurisdictions' portion of the franchise fee. After much discussion at its meeting on March 16th, the MACC commission determined that, so as to keep the transfer of the franchise oa schedule and to keep the MACC member jurisdictions operating in unison, the other jurisdictions should be presented with a resolution deleting the change in distribution of franchise fees from the proposed amendments to the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement. It was generally agreed by the MACC Commissioners that the member jurisdictions should work toward a unified position regarding their support of access and local origination programming, but that at this time it was important to maintain cohesion among the members and that the best way to do so was to maintain the status quo with regard to distribution of the franchise fees. Bob Jean presented a forceful argument in this regard. CEC omch 3/17/88 4 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 28,_1988 — DATE SUBMITTED: 21, 1988 ? ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Public Ijear'in� PREVIOUS ACTION: _ on Dartmouth LID - ` 001 -- _ PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooler �L��r! DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0 7.. REQUESTED D BY. PLICY ISSUE - ._ F Public hearing on the Dartmouth Street Improvement District No. 40. E INFORMATION_SUMMARY On March 14th, the Council approved a resolution setting March 28th as the date fora public hearing to :consider final plans and specifications for the u Dartmouth LID. Property owners have been notified. Mr. Charles Ruttan, attorney for the Martin family, has objected that the scheduled date does not provide sufficient time for property owners to review the final plans and other relevant documents. In order to assure that adequate information is available to all interested persons, the City Attorney has recommended that the hearing be continued to b April 11, 1988- Since the hearing has been advertised for March 28th, it will be `necessary to formally open the hearing and continue it to April 11th. I am notifying property owners of this expected continuation. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Hold the hearing as scheduled. 2. Open the hearing on the 28th and continue it to a date ce-again. is FISCAL IMPACT . SUGGESTED ACTION��-. Staff recommends that the hearing be continued to April 11, 1988. br'L3808D k f March 22, 1988 OREGON Dear Property Owner: In my letter dated March 15, 1988, l notified you that the Tigard City Council planned to hold a public hearing on Monday, March 28, 1985, to take testimony regarding the Dartmouth 'Street Improvement District #40. At the request of the attorneys,for the Martin family, affected property owners, the ;Council is expected to reschedule the hearing to Monday, April 11, 1988, at the Tigard CivicCenter, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon at 7:30 PM to allow:more time for review of the information provided by the City. The information will now be available for public review beginning March 28, 1988. Since public notice was given of the March 28th meeting, the Council must open the hearing at the March 28th meeting and continue the hearing to a' date certain. I fully expect that the hearing will be held on April 11th. I hope that this delay does not present problems to you. Sincerely, Randall R. Wooley Acting Director Community Development Department br/3809D i t i 113 all Blvd.,2551�/FE B R0,Box 23397 Tigard, I .Oregon 97223. . (503)639-4171 ;, . CITYOF rIGARD OREGON £, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMF�RY AGENDA OF: March 28 1988 DATE SUBMIl�l"ED: March�l71988 c ning ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Cha ter 18.114 HcaViOnUs onT12/15/87an1/19 6 -2/21/88_ Signs ZOA 87-07' 3/8/88and 3/15/88 PREPAREDD_ebo_rah R� Stuart ; ----- — s DEPT HEAD 0 CITY:A:DM.INEQULS ED BY _ �__ PO ICS r < Shall the City's Sign Code (TMC 18,114) be revised? if INFORMATION SUMMARY Z Attached is the eighth draft of revisions to Chap 18.114 of the Code which regulates' signs. The Planning Commission has met five times to discuss the t, The Sign Code and the City Attorney's office has been cvisinns onsulto allawted uoneuballoon ' changes include new, improved definitions; 2)_P ermitIK per owner or legal occupant per year; 3) insertion of sign p requirements; 4) revised standards and V�orExceptionsistent Wocr�iter iing s for the enewP proposed e zoning districts; 5) new Administra 6) changes (mostly deletions) to make signs and existing nonconforming signs; standards the Code "content-neutral" consistent with recent court cases; 7) i; for freeway—oriented signs; 8) provisions to allow two freestanding signs on by Sign Code corner lots bycies administrative ' review and on interior lots R ' ce tion approval; and 9) corrections for nconsistenCommibsiun and exhibi een the CDC nd Lts . x p the TMC. Attached are the minutes, memos to the w. submitted by the public for the December 15th, January 19th,proposed revri ions March 8th, and March 15th Planning Commission hearings, p p i (Draft # 8, Exhibit "A"), and an 'ordinance for adoption. ~� ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED k r. 1. Adopt the proposed revisions recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Adopt the proposed revisions recommended by the Planning Commission with , a modifications, 3. Reject the Planning Commission's recommendations, FISCAL IMPACT None �— SUGGESTED ACTION attached ordinance for ZOA 87--07, 1. Adopt thea t cn/1825D •ti MEMORANDUM a CITY OF'TIGARD, OREGON i g TO: The City Council t March 2.1, 1988 Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Plannerr FROM: � SUBJECT: Sign Code Revisions (ZQA 87-07) F ( Attached are the revisions to Chapter 18,114 of the Community Development Code which pertain to :signs. The City Attorney's office has worked with staff and has approved of recommended changes through and including draft number pro�d an following highlights the changes the Planning recommended to the City Council for adoption: of provisions which could be interpreted as 1. Removal or alteration regulating sign content. 2. Correction of typoaraohical and aranimati_. ical errors. � i � a 3. -Oregon Motorist Information -tact. Section 18.114.010(d), page 1, adopts by reference the provisions of this act which regulates billboards along State -highways. 4. Definitions• Section 18.114.015, pages 1--8. a) Several obsolete terms � "Incombustible no longer used in the code will be deleted (e.g. , "Incombustible real Material") along with content—related terms (e.g., estate, religious assembly signs). b) Regulations which were located in x the definitions section were relocated to more appropriate locations (e.g. , temporary signs). c) Similar ter-ins were grouped under common categories (e.g. , Temporary Signs ("A" frame, banner, balloon, etc.) and Lighting Methods (internal, external, etc.). 5. ' Administrative Variances. Section 18.114.030(j), Page 10, provides for' variance review by the ns which Planning Commission of is°Sn scode t�oexception ' cannot be considered as administrative or g applications (non—dimensional requests). Vii. Section 18.114.070(1)-, page 15, prohibits si ns on vehicles. This is a new regulation. 7. Section 18.114.085, page 15, now spells out how staff measu_ res signs. 8, Special Condition Signs. Section 18.114,090 has been expanded to include provisions for; a, Ballo__o_ns. 18.114.090(c), page 19, allows one per, owner or legal .. occupant per year. •' City Council' Page'2 March 21, 1988 b, Electronic Message Centers. 18.114:090(4), page 19 The code distinguishes between flashing signs which are prohibited and electronic message centers which-`are-allowed-only in the C—G and CBD zoning district by the length of `a ,light interval: Flashing signs 2 second or less; Electronic,Message Centers = greater than 2 seconds in duration. c. Freeway—Oriented Signs. 18.114.090(e), page 20. The Code will allow' freeway-oriented signs on propertieswhich directly abut 1-5 or Hwy. 217 with a sign permit. Proposed signs not abutting but which' will be located within "1,000 feet of' these-freeways may apply for freeway oriented sign approval via a s._qn code ' exception application. Maximum height =;35 feet. Maximum sign area =>120 square feet/face. d. Awning Signs, 18.114.090(f), pages 20 and 21. These provisions clarify how awning signs will be 'handled. A new definition has now been inserted in the definitions section (18.114.015(4)). No previous regulations' for such, signs existed. e', Flush Pitched "Roof" Signs, 18:114.090(8), page 21. Signs on roofs with an angle of more than 45 degrees from horizontal will be allowed with a sign permit. , Roof top signs will not be allowed as before. 9. Temporary Signs. See Section '18.114.100(c)(1) and (2), page 22. a) A distinction is now made between temporary rigid signs and temporary lawn signs. The latter replace provisions for political, _ ideological, religious, etc. , signs which inappropriately regulated sign content. Lawn signs will be exempt from ,sign permit requirements. b) Temporary sign permits will allow the following dimensions: Before After Temporary signs 6-70 sq ft/face 6 sq ft/face—residential (content-related) 32 sq ft/face--commercial/ industrial Lawn signs --- 6 sq ft/face Wall banners 18 sq ft maximum 30 sq ft maximum Balloons Not Allowed Allowed with permit Pennants Not Allowed Not Allowed c) One balloon per owner or legal occupant per year will be allowed with a City sign permit. See Section 18.114.090(c), page 19. 10. insertion of new dimensional criteria for freestanding and wall signs in the CCN and C--P zoning districts. The existing code does not discuss all dimensional requirements (such as sign height) nor does it address all sign types and situations in these zoning districts. See Section 18.114.130(4) and (3), page 31 and 32. 4 r" City Council Page 3 March 2.1, 1988 s s 1.1. 'Cross-references to special condition signs and temporary signs were inserted throughout Section 18-..114,130, pages 25-39, to clarify that they are allowed in certain (or all) zoning districts: 12. Two Freestanding Signs. Section 18.114.145(a)(6), page 41, explains when the Planning Commission can approve`a Sian Code Exception request for a II second freestanding sign oninterior lots. Second freestanding signs p will be allowed administratively ;on cornerproperties''via a sign permit provided the proposal can meet the requirements of Section 18'.114.130(g)(5), Page 39. 13. Insertion of Criteria- for Approval of an Administrative Exception. Section 18.114.148, pages 42-43. Allows for an administrative procedure to allow proposed new signs and existing nonconforming signs if they vary no morethan5 percent from 'code dimensional requirements. 14. Sign Permit Requirements. Section 18.114.160, page 45, has been added to clarify sign permit'application requirements. Staff- believes these changes are necessary to make the Sign Cade legally defensible, administratively efficient and more clear and understandable to the public. The proposed changes will offer increased signage opportunities to the business community, both in terms of the number of signs as well as the i size of signs. The Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the Sign Code be reviewed again in one year to determine any inconsistencies as well as to measure- its success and administrative ease. This 'recommendation appears in the attached ordinance. ht/3754D Attachments i ; P i 1 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I ORDINANCE NO. 88-bio Y E AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18.114 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE —SIGNS - AND I SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE - (ZOA 87-07). r WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its , Community j Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and i WHEREAS, the Planning Staff made recommendation of findings to the City of Tigard Planning Commission on December 15, 1987, January 19, 1988, February 23, 1988, March "8 and 15, 1988; and 1 WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changes on March 28, 1988. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Tigard Municipal Code', Signs,; shall be SECTION L: Chapter 18.114 of the amended as shown in Exhibit "A". Language to be deleted is shown in [BRACKETS]. Language to be added is UNDERLINED. g SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective on and after, the 30th day after its passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor and posting by the Recorder. f PASSED: 8Y .._. vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this ___ day Y< of 1988. Cathy Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder APPROVED: This day of 1988. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor Approv,0 as to form: f City Attorney rrkk'' e y� Date lw/3753U ORDINANCE NO 88-QX9 EXHIBIT A" 18.114 SIGNS 18.114.010 Purpose 18,114.01_2 Effective Date of this Chapter• 18.114`.015Definitions 18.114.020 Permits Required 18.114.030 Administration and Approval Process 18.114.040 Expiration of Approval — Standards for Extension « Time 18.114.050 Inspections 18.114.060 Sign Exempt••ions 18,114.070 Certain Signs Prohibited 18.114.080 Sign Illumination 18.114.085 Sign Measurement 18.114.090 Special Condition Signs 18,114.100 Temporary Signs 18.114`.110 Nonconforming Signs 18.114.120 Sign Removal Provisions — Nonconforming and Abandoned Signs' 18.114.130 Zoning District Regulations 18,114.140 Exceptions 18.114.145 Approval'Criteria for Exceptions to Sign Code, 18.114.148 Criteria for Approval of an Administrative Exception 18.114.150 Sign Code Exception Application Submission Requirements 18.114.160 Sian Permit Application Requirements l ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 PAGE 0 — ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) t L E 18.114.010 Purpose The purpose Of this Chapter, is: (a) To protect the health, safety, property and welfare of the (1) public; (2) To improve the neat, clean, orderly and attractive appearance of the community; 3 [To improve the effectiveness of signs in identifying the ( ) advertising businesses;] conditions r To allow and romote ositsamet ne avoidinnuisanceslto users` needs while at the y nearby properties. (4) To provide f-or safe construction, location, erection, and maintenance of signs; ; rid sign clutter; and (5) To prevent proliferation of signs ae t To minimize adverse visual safety factor, to public highway s (6) travelers. Chapter to regulate the In addition, it is the purpose of this Chap location, (b) quality of materials, construction, design, q illuminations and 'maintenance of all signs electrification, or from public rights-of.-way visible from public property permit the erection or, (c) It s purpose of i this Chapter, inot the puto manner unlawful sign at any maintenance of any placeorn any s under any other, ordinance or state or federal law. of the Oregon (d) This Chan ter ado is b reference the rovisions_ ; Motorist Information Act ORS 377.700-377.992. 18.114.012 Effective Date of this Chapter } tive date of A11 references made in this cha t83 unless otherwise sp cificahy Cha ter shall mean November 9 19 sion. stated in an ordinance revi 18.114.015 Definitions in the 4 a For the purpose of this Chapter,wornumberd includespthenplural, � (a) include the future, the g and "buildi.ng" includes { "shall" is mandatory and riot directory "structures" except "sign structures. 4 unless the context requires otherwise, the As used in this title, 4 (b) es shall have the meanings set forth in following words and phrases this Chapter, 806_ PAGE 1 ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT a (3/21/88) ORDINANCE NO: fit. } (c) The definitions to be used in this Chapter are in addition to a Chapter 18.26, Definitions,_and are as follows: r (1) "A" Board [r][r] Refers to any double face temporary rig d sign, [which does not exceed twelve square feet per side.] € i -MAbandoned�Sicln. A sin structure riot containing a sign rur } 90 continuous days or a_sign not in use for 90 continuous days_ [(2)] Area, See Sec Lion 18.114.0085for definition of sic n�area. [means the entire area within any type of perimeter which encloses the outer, limits of any writing, representation, emblem, figure or character. The area of a-sign having no such per•imeter'or, border, shall be computed by enclosing the � entire surface area within a parallelogram or triangle, then computing the area thereof. The area of all signs in existence at the date of adoption of this title, whether conforming or, nonconforming, shall be counted in establishing the permitted sign aria of all signs allowed for an individual business on a premises. Where a sign is of a three-dimensional or round or irregular solid shape, E the largest cross—section shall be used in a flat projection for the purpose of determining sign area;] Awning Sign. A sign incar�e�.ted:into or attached to an KAI awning. t Balloon. See definition under Tem orar Sign'_ Subsection 16.114.015 49 F Banner. See definition under Temporary Sign, Subsection 18.114.015 49L [(3)] Bench Sign_ [means a] A bench designed to seat people ri which carries a written or graphic message. [(4)] Billboards [See "Outdoor Advertising Sign."] Billboard shall mean a sign face supported by a billboard structure_ Billboard Structure. Billboard structure shall mean the structural framework which supports a billboard_ 10 [(6)] Building Officials [means] Officer or designee of the City empowered to enforce the Uniform Building Code. 11 [(5)] Businesses [means a] All of the activities carried on by the same legal entity on the same premises and includes eleemosynary, fraternal, religious, educational or social organizations. "Legal entity" includes, but is riot limited to, individual proprietorships, partnerships, corporations, nonprofit- corporations, associations.= or joint stock companies, t f ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 2 - ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) i k, [(7) Businessof Outdoor Advertising includes the business of constructing, erecting, operating, using, maintaining, or leasing outdoor- advertising signs.] 12 [(8)] Construct_ [means e] every type of display in the form of f letters, figures, characters, representations. € [(g)] Cutout. e] Every type 'of display in the form of f letters, figures, characters, representations_ or others in cutout or irregular,form attached to or superimposed upon a sign or advertising sign, 14 [(10}] Development Review_ [means t] The site development review ("� process set forth in Chapters 18.120,or 18.13Q or ].$�8Q. g " [Directional Sign. Refers to any single or double faced, permanents or tempora ry sign designed to direct or, to guide pedestrian or vehicular traffic.] [(A) Street-oriented directional signs, Any directional f sign located along the street frontage or near an access or egress point on a property. Such signs each require a sign permit and payment of associated fees.] i [(B) Orr-•site directional _ si ns. Any directional sign d internally on real property. No erected nr locate sign permit: or fee shall be required for such signs � (18'.114,060(a)(9))•] ? designed and ' 15 Directional Sign. A permanent sign which `i__�s ____.._ erected solely for thn_purpose of traffis or _pedestrian direction,and placed on-the property to which the public is directed. 16 [{il)] "Display Sur•f-ace. [means t] The area made available by, the sign structure for the purpose of displaying the advertising or identification message. i 17 [(12)] Electrical Sign. [i] Includes any sign utilizing electrical wiring. 18 [(13)] Electronic Information Sign, Includes signs, displays, devicesor portions thereof with lighted changing messages that change at intermittent intervals, each lasting more 3 than two seconds, by electronic process or remote control. Electronic information signs are not identified as signs. Also known as an rotating, revolving, or moving g g i automatic_ changeable copy _sign or electronic variable message center. [(14) Externally Illuminated Sign includes a sign illuminated from an external light source.] 19 [(15)] Face of a Building. [means a] All window and wall areas of i a building in one or more parallel planes, 1. ORDINANCE NO, 88-06 - PAGE 3 - ZOA 87•-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) 20 [(16)] Flashing Sign. [means a] Any sign which is illuminated by an intermittent: or sequential flashing light source whose interval is two seconds or less in duration, or which is in any 'other- way animated so as to create the illusion of movement without actual physic'almovement or the illusion of a flashing or intermittent light or light '- source, [Flashing signs do riot include electronic information signs.] 21 _, Flush Pitched "Roof" Sign. A sign attached to a mansard or Simi lar type of roof. See Subsection 18.114.090(g). [(17)] Freestanding Sign. [means a] A sign erected and mounted on a freestanding frame, mast or ,pole and not attached to any building, X23 (18) Freeway-oriented Signer [means a] A sign primarily designed to be road by a motorist traveling on a' highway designated by the Oregon State Highway Department as a freeway ,or expressway; specifically, these shall be Interstate 5, and Oregon State Highway #21:7, and shall not include U.S. Highway 99W• 24 (19) Frontage. [means t] The length of the property line of any one premise along a publ4.c roadway, [(20) Ideological)Sign means signs which communicate a political, moral, or philosophical comments or religious statement which does not promote any commercial' interest or refer specifically to a particular ballot measure to be voted on in the next election,] 25 [(21)] Immediate or Serious Dangers This includes: (A) Whenever any portion of the structure is damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood or other causes; and any member or appurtenance that is likely to fail, or, become detached or dislodged., or to collapse and thereby injure persons or, damage property, (B) Whenever any portion of the structure is not of sufficient strength or, stability or, is not so anchored, attached., or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one-half of that specified in the Uniform Building Code for this type structure or, similar structure and will not exceed the working stresses permitted in the Uniform Building Code for such structures. (C) Whenever the location of the sign structure obstructs the view of motorists traveling on the public streets [or any place] or private property, and thus causes damage to property or- thereby injures persons, ORDINANCE NO, 88-06 PAGE 4 ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) f [(22) Incidental Sign means signs advertisirig or- identifying associated goods, products, services or facilities available on the 'premises, including, but not limited to, trading stamps, credit- cards accepted or brand names.] [(23) IncombustibleMaterial means any material which will not ignite at, or below, a temperature of twelve hundred y degrees Fahrenheit during an exposure of five minutes and which will not continue to burn or, glow at that temperature when tested in acc.or•dance with standards established in the Uniform Building Code.] 26 [(24)] Industrial Park. [means a] A parcel of land which complies with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.68. [(25) Internally Illuminated Sign means signs with an internal source of illumination where the light source is not visible from the exterior of the sign.] 27 Lawn Sign. See definition under 'Temporary Sign Subsection ' 18.114,015(49), (2� Lighting methods. Direct. _Exposed 'lighting or neon tubes on the sin face. ' (B) Elashing. _ -_ights which blink on and off randnm_1-_or in sequence. `Indirect or External. The light source is separate from the sign face or cabinet and is directed so as to shine onthe sign. D Internal. The light source is concealed within the x sign. ' i [(26) Maintain means to permit a sign, sign-structure or-part thereof to continue or to repair or refurbish a sign, sign f. structure or, part thereof.] 24 Maintenance. Normal care needed to keep a sign functional x, such as c.leaninu, oiling and changing, and repair of light bulbs and sign faces Does not include structural alteration. [(27) Nameplate means signs identifying only the name and occupation or profession of the occupant of the premises on which the sign is located.] r; 30 Nonconforming Sign. A sign nr sign structure lawfully erected and properly maintained that would not be allowed under the sign regulations presently applicable to the site. 51 [(28)] Nonstructural Trim. [means t] The moldings, battens, caps, nailing strips and latticing, letters,, and walkways which are attached to a sign structure. C ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 - PAGE 5 ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) 9 [(29) Off--premises Sign means any sign including, but not limited to, a , painted ;sign, temporary sign, permanent sign or outdoor advertising sign, which sign advertises goods, products or services which are ;riot sold, manufactured or distributed on or from the premises or a sign which advertises a business or facilities not located on the premises on which the sign is located.] [(30) Outdoor Advertising or Billboard Sign means sign - constructed, erected and maintained by a person licensed to engage in the business of outdoor advertising and which sign is an off-premises sign supported by a substantial permanent sign structure with a display surface or display surfaces primarily designed for the purpose of painting or posting advertising messagethereon at periodic intervals, and where customarily, although not exclusively, the use of the display surface is leased to other persons. Sometimes referred to as "billboards."] L3 2� Painted Wall Decorations. Painted wall decorations are displays. paint directly on a wwaal and are designed and intended as a decorative or ornamental feature. Decorations mom' also include li•hy itiU. 33 Painted Wall Highlights. painted wall highlights are painted areas which architectural or structuralfeatures, - KIAJ Painted Wall Sign, A sign plied to a building wall with paint and which has no sign structure. 35 [(31),] Penson, [means i] Individuals, corporations, associations, firms, partner-ships, and joint- stock companies. [(32) Plastic Material means those materials made wholly or partially from standardized plastics listed and described in the Uniform Building Code or approved plastics which have been approved by the Underwriters Laboratory for use in construction of electrical signs.] [(33) Political Signs means signs promoting or opposing a candidate or measure in a specific election.] 36 [(34)] Premises. [means o] One or more lots on which are constructed or on which are to be constructed a building or a group of buildings designed as a unit. [(35) Projecting Sign means signs other than a wall sign which projects from a building.] .(171 Projecting Sign. A sign attached to a building other than a wall sign in which the sign face is not parallel to the wall. Such sign shall not project above the wall of the building to which it is attached, except where there is an existing parapet. ORDINANCE NO. 88--06 PAGE 6 - ZOA 87-07 —. DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) 38 C(36)] Projections [means t] The distance by which a projecting; sign extends from a building. 39 Public Sign Signs legally erected _fur tr__a_ffic or ur oses by or on behalf of a 99vLe neat J nformational p p Nency, 37)] Readerboar•d Sign_ [means a]; Any sign with changeable copy �40� [( as message, except electronic information signs. or 41 Roof Line The_,Ttop �ed-g9---°f a roof or building ria s, whichever is h�� iaher. excluding ar. cu olas,�cMlmney__=-s=-- otherminor �roj?ct_ En- (means S_� ns a] A sign erected fully upon or directly 42 [(38)] Roof- Sign. above a roof line or parapet of a building or structure. Exceptions; Approv,____,ed____temporary balloons si ns attached to existingarchitectural features and flush ted' signs 43 [(39)] Rotating,.. Revolving or Moving Sign,_ [means a] Any sign, or portion of a-sign, which moves in any manner. 4A Sho ping Center . Areas of not less than eight business units. 45 Shopping Pl___.._ aza:-Areas of seven or fewer business units.. [(40) Sign means an advertising sign, outdoor advertising sign, on-premises sign, display, temporary sign, temporary sign -than a`device used primarily display, messagelight, g (other emblem, device, to illuminate a building or a Premises),lacard, poster or figure or mannequin, painting, drawing, p_ other thing that is designed, used or intended for advertising purposes, or to inform or to attract the attentionof the public, and includes, where applicable, the sign structure, display surfaces and all other component parts of the sign.] 46 Sign Materials placed_.__or, constructed pr!__ im�rily t_ °-p°nvey a message or other dis 1a and which can be viewer) from.. a ri ht-of-wa rivate roadwa or another property or from the e air. 47 C(41)] Sign Structure [means a] Any structure which supports or is capable of supporting any sign as described in the Uniform Building Code. A sign structurebe buildingIngle pole and may or may riot be an integral part of a 48 Structural Alteration. Modification of the size, shape, ar height of a sign structur�_eJAlso _include4 replacement of sign structure materials with other than cam arable materials, fob ple metal parts replacing wo�ud ps ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 - PAGE 7 - ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/2.1/88) 49 [(42)] Temporary Signer '[means a] -Any sign, "A" board frame, banner, lawn sign ar ' balloon [or advertising display] which is not permanently erected or permanently affixed to _ any sign structure, sign tower, the 2round_, or building and which is riot an electrical sign or an; internally illuminated; sign or one with changeable message characteristics. ) Temporary RiaidSigner Fl temporarU sign, other than a lawn sign made of rigid materials such as wood pljwood, plastic.:See Subsection 18.114.100 c . (B� Balloon. An inflatable temporary sign anchored by' some means to a structure on the ground. Includes simple childrens' balloons hot and cold air balloons, blimps, and other . dirigibles. See Subsection 18.114.090S _ Banner. A sign_ made of fabric or other,—nonrigid. material with no enclosing framework'. See Subsection 18.114.100 c 5 . Lawn Sign. A temporary freestanding sign which is exempt from sign permit requirements See Subsection 18.114.060-(b)(2) 50 Tenant Sign. A"sign placed in control of a current tenant or ro ert owner p. 51 [(43)] Uniform Building Code_ [means t] The most recent structural µ and specialty Oregon Uniform Building Code as adopted by the Oregon Department of Commerce, and which Uniform Building Code,` by this reference,' is incorporated in this title to the extent of specific citations thereof in this title. (5� [(44)] Wall Sign, [means a] Any sign attached to, painted on, or erected against the wall of a building or structure, with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the plane of the wall. 18.114.020 Permits Required (a) No sign or sin structure .shall hereafter be erected, reerected, constructed, structurally altered or relocated within the city limits except as provided by this title, and a permit for the same sign or sign structure has been issued by the Director [and designee]. (b) A separate permit [is] shall be required for each [a] sign or signs for each business entity and a separate permit [is] shall be required for each group of signs on a single supporting structure. (c) A separate permit [is] shall be required when it is proposed to remove a sign from its supporting structure for its repair and maintenance (d) Separate structural permits under the Uniform Building Code shall also apply. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 —PAGE 8 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 0 (3/21/88) (e) In addition, an electrical permit shall be obtained for all he enforcing agency, subject to the illuminated signs, frum te provisions of the State Electrical Code: a 18.114.030 Administration and Approval Process (a) The applicant; for sign permit [structure] proposals or sign code exceptions shall be the recorded owner of the property or an agent g the owner. authorized in writin by (b)' A Preapplication Conference with City staff is required fur sign_ ;code exception applicants. See 'section 18.32.040. (c) Due to possible changes in State statutes, or regional or local policy, information given by staff to the applicant during the is valid for, not more than six months. Preapplication Conference , (1) Another Preapplication Conference is required if any accessory use or structure application is submitted six months after the Preapplication Conference (2) Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this Chapter shall not constitute a waiver of � the standard, criteria or requirements of the applications. G shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny any (d) The Director application for a sign permit. The Di.r•ector shall- apply.. the . et forth in [Sections 18.114.080, 18.114.090 and standards s 18.114`,130 et this [Code] Chapter when reviewing an application j sign. n. ' for a, g � .' appealed in accordance with (e) The decision of the DirectThen�ao lawinshall qualify to have Subsection 18,32.310(a) . n -_-Iha standing as a party (1) Any person who has been ordered by the Director to remove a sign, alleged to be in violation of this Chapter; (2) Any person whose permit e rider this erect peer,alter a sign has been refused or revoked u (3) Any person seeking an exception from the provisions of this Chapter; (4) Any person adversely affected by a determination of nonconformity by the Director under Section 18.114.110; (5) Any person otherwise adversely affected by a determination Y made under this Chapter. (f) No hearing before the Commission shall be granted from a decision E by the Director unless the appeal is filed within ten days of the decision, ORDINANCE NO. 88-06_ — PAGE 9 -- ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (g) , Application for hearing shall not stay the action of the Directorunless the applicant requests a,stay and after' appropriate notice i and Mearinys, ' Lhe Director determines that specific public safety ` considerationsoutweigh the delay of the ,action for the hearing and review process. t p , (h) The Director• is authorized and directed to enforce all of the 4 provisions of this Chapter. F (1) All signs for which permits are required shall be inspected ' by the [Building Official.] Director. (2) Upon presentation_ of proper credentials, the [Building Official] Director may enter at reasonable times any building, structure • or premises in the City to'perform any duty, imposed upon the position by this Chapter. Si n ermir_t and_sign code exception n fees will beset by reso___•_ lotion ' of the Cid Council. s Applications for, Administr_._-- ative Variances 1;o th7is Chapter shall be reviewed by the Commission accordingto the a__pP offal Cr_ rtetla contained in Section 18.134.050. ' 18.114.040 Expiration of Approval -- Standards for Extension of Time (a) Sign permit approval by the Director shall be effective for a period of [ninety] 90 days from the date of approval. (b) The sign permit approval by the Directorshall lapse if: . ' (1) Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within the [ninety] 90 day period; E (2) Construction on the site is .a departure from the approved plan. (o) The Director shall, upon written request by the applicant, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed [ninety] 90 days [;] provided [,] that: (1) No changes are made on the original sign permit plan as approved by the Director; a initiating The applicant can show intent of ini g construction of (2) the sign within the [ninety] 90 day extension period; and (3) There have been no changes in the applicable policies and ordinance provisions and Uniform Building Code provisions on which the approval was based. 18.114.050 Inspections (a) General_ A11 construction work for which a permit is required E< shall be subject to an inspection by the Building Official per the Uniform Building Code and this title. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 10 - ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) a i of the lot or proposed locai:i0fficial may be requireon for �gtoe�ver•ify (1) A survsy the Building d by roved plans ! compliance,of the structure with app Neither the Building Official nor the jurisdiction [is] (2) erase, or other obligations, entailed shall_be. liable for' exp material' required to in the removal or replacement of any allow inspection: Of the person doing the a fib) Inspection Requests It shall be the dutyuthe Building Official that d a permit to notify s work authorize by P E such work is ready for inspection. The Building Official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least one such inspection is desired. working day before c Required Inspections_ Reinforcing structOrel or shall. not beelcov covered ork or s (c) of any part of the proposed concealed without first obtaining approval of the Building Official. fi Foundation inspections shall be mad__e_••• after' all•--rE'-gired { excavations, form work bolt settin s ore completed and_ read to 4 receiv? cont_ rete^ S?� All al. nchoraaes--shall-be left exposed for`insp___E�tion• z S f� iris ection shall be made by the apency iss �c uin Electrical y ctr'icalRerm•its_ s ectionS. Final inspection sh�a11 e cction shal alled b count ( Final In p_•_•_ - --- app- l�_ _cant when all work is completed Thi`.•_.s_lnspe State law or e all items r•equlred b__y_ h�? �catio • lands.a ng under- it required, and city 'ordin_ance _such as the locations, K gene compliance with t_he a roved plans,- and .:requirements of this titles 18.114.050 Sign Exemptions a) The following signs and operations shal notr quiret sig of ethic but shall conform to all other applicableof this section: Chapter and the provisions of subsection (b) rental or lease of [(1) Signs advertising exclusively the sale, premises on which the signs ar-e located;] r [(2) Memorials or tablets, names of buildings and dates of erection, if either cut into any masonry surface or constructed of bronze or, other incombustible material;] [(3) Signs denoting the architect, engineer, contractor, and . similar information concerning a subdivision or development and placed on the construction site;] • ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 PAGE 11 - ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) l 111s; 111 IM j [(A) Signs denoting one time clearance sales of household goods (e.g. a garage sale);] [(5) Signs promoting or opposing a candidate or measure in a specific election;] [(F) Ideological signs;] [(7) Signsof temporary nature advertising events or products for sale for nonprofit organizations.] [(8)] Signs of a temporary nature which meet all of the following criteria: (a) There is no more than one temporary sign on the premises; for, each temporary sign in excess of the one exempted sign a temporary sign permit shal'1 be required as provided in Section 18.114.100; and (b) Wall signs or wall banners which do not exceed eighteen square feet in area or freestanding signs , which do riot exceed a_total of 30 [twelve] square feet in area; (c) The temporary sign will be erected for a period no longer than sixty days; t Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of---way, private road or other private proper-ty; a Signs inside a building, except for strobe lights visible from a right-of-way, private road or other, private _prn ert'�� E KAI r Painted wall Decorations; Painted wall Hi.ghli.ghts Lawn Signs; S7� Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the City is a partyentered by courts of competent jurisdiction; Directional Signs; S9� [(10)] Nothing in this title shall prevent [s] the erection, location, or construction of directional [or instructional] signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to direct or to guide or to instruct pedestrians or vehicular traffic while on the parcel of real property on which the signs are located. No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs; and _ORDINANCE NO. 88-05 -- PAGE. 12. — ZOA 87-07 -• DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) fj i. 10 [(9)] Nothing in this title shall prevent _[s] the erection, location., or construction of signs on private property ' wheresuch erection, construction, or location is required by any law or ordinance 'nor shall any public agency or utility be prohibited from erecting signs on private property when otherwise permitted__ [;] (b) All signs exempt from permit 'requiroments under subsection (a) of this section shall meet the following requirements: (1) The sign shall be erected on private property with the consent of the lawful possessor, of the property and 'shall riot be placed on utility poles or in the public right—of--way; (2) Except as otherwise stated in Subsection 18.114.060(x)(8) of this section the total area of exempted lawn or, temporary' signage per parcel shall riot exceed six square feet per face` in single family residential, [twelve] six square feet per face in multifamily zones, [fifteen] 32 square feet per face in C-N zoning districts, and [seventy] 32 square feet per face in other zoning districts, regardless of the number of signs; and (3) At least- one sign shall be permitted per parcel of land;' additional signs on such parcel shall be spaced at least [fifty]' 50, feet apart in residential zoning districts and [thirty] 30 feet apart in nonresidential zoning districts. (c) Lawn_signs [Signs] exempt from permit requirements under subsection [(a)(1) and]' S [(3) to (5)] of this section shall be removed within [fourteen] ten days of their initial display. [from the end of the event displayed.] (d) The sign permit: provisions of this Section shall not apply to repair, maintenance, or change of copy (including, but riot limited to the changing of a message on a sign specifically designed for the use of replaceable copy), or unlawfully erected or maintained signs. 18.114.070 Certain Signs Prohibited (a) Prohibited Display of Flags and Banners. It is a violation of this Chapter to erect or maintain strings of pennants, banners or streamers, festoons of lights, clusters of flags, strings of twirlers or propellers, flashing or blinking lights, flares, balloonsL and similar devices of carnival character. Exceptions: (1) National, states and institutional flags properly displayed; (2) Seasonal decorations, [and generally recognized holidays;] (3) Signs [Pennants] and banners approved as temporary signs; and Balloons as allowed in Subsection 18.114.090 _ ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 13 - ZOA 87-07 -DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (b) Unsafe Signs or Improperly Maintained Signs. No sign shall be constructed, . erected or maintained unless - the sign and sign structure is so constructed, erected, and maintained as to be able to withstand the wind, seismic and other requirements as specified in the Uniform Building Code, or, this Code. a (c) Signs at Intersections. No sign' shall. be erected at intersections of any streets in such a manner as to materially obstruct free ;and clear: vision. All signs s_� hall be consistent withChapter 18.102 of this Code r (1) No sign shall be erected at any location where, ,by reason of the position, shape, or color, that interferes with, obstructs the view of, or could be confused with, any authorized traffic signal or device; i (2) Na sign shall be erected which makes use of the word stop, "look," ''danger,° or any other similar- word, phrase, symbols or character in such manner as is i reasonably likely to interfere with, mislead, or confuse , motorists. (d) Obscenity. No sign shall bear or contain statements, words,, or pictures in which the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex or is patently offensive because it affronts the contemporary community standard relating to the description or representation of sexual material which is utterly without redeeming social value. (e) Traffic Obstructing Signs. No sign or sign structure shall be constructed in such a manner or at such a location that it will obstruct access to any fire escape or other means of ingress or egress from a building or-any exit corridor, exit hallway, or exit doorway. No sign or supporting structure shallcover, wholly or partially, any window or doorway in any manner that it will substantially limit access to the building in case of fire. [(f) Off—premise Signs. No off-premises sign shall be permitted in any commercial or industrial zone, except outdoor advertising signs, as regulated in other parts of this title. Off—premise signs may only be approved by the Commission through the exception procedure established by Section 18.114.140 of this Chapter.] Abandoned Signs. (g) Bare Light Bulbs. Strings of bare lights shall not be constructed, erected, or maintained within view of any private _or public street or [public] right—of—way except if designed as part of a structure's architectural design_. This subsection shall not apply to lighting displays as described in [subdivision (a) of subsection (a) of this] Subsection 18.114.070 (a)(2 . (h) Roof Signs. Roof signs of any kind are prohibited, including temporary signs[.] with the sale exception of approved temporary balloons. (i) Revolving Signs. Revolving, rotating or moving signs of any kind are prohibited. ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 — PAGE 14 — ZOA 87-07 -- DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (j) Flashing Signs. A sign which displays flashing or intermittent or: sequential licdht or liits of changing degrees or intensity with each interval in the cycle lasting two seconds ori less. Exposed reflective—type bulbs, strobe lights, rotary beacons, par spots, zip lights, or similar devices shall be prohibited. (k) Temporary Signs with Illumination or, Changeable Copy. A sign not permanently erected or affixed to any sign structure, sign tower, or building which is an electrical or internally illuminated sign or- a sign with changeable message characteristics. Right—of--Way. Signs in the e public right—of--waY in whole in._part . except signs legally erected fear informational ur owes by or on behalf of a crovernment agency... Signs on Vehicle Any sign placed on orpainted on a motor vehicle or trailer-,- as defined qyiORS 805.560E .565, and .590, with the primary purpose of providing a`sign not otherwise allowed for by .this` Code. 18.114.080 Sign Illumination (a) The surface brightness of any sign shall riot exceed that produced by the diffused 'output obtained from [eight hundred] 800 milliampere -fluorescent light sources spaced not closer than eight inches, center on center. (b) Exposed incandescent lamp which exceeds "[twenty-five] 25 watts shall not be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb :or lamp to any public street or public right—of—way with,the exception of electronic information signs. 18,114.085 Sign Measurement ) Projecting and Freestanding The area of a 'freestanding or projecting sign shall include all, sign faces counted in calculating its area Regardless of the number of sign cabinets or sign faces the total allowable area shall riot be exceeded. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows if the sign is composed of one or more individual cabinets: The area around and enclosing the perimeter- of each cabinet sign face or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area The perimeter of measurablearea shall not include embellishments such as pole covers` framing,_. decorative roofing etc. , ro_p vided there is not written advertising copy on such embellishments. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 - PAGE 15 - ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) k S T.f the sin is co m osed_1-'f more than t��o jg— cabinets,. `- enclosing the--en-tire the area S1Tl le sin facia or modules _____ -•- erimeter of all cabinet,ea yMal•--1be duthe area °f the s- n s co_ ntlnuous eumetric Ibe Pole covers and other embellasurement ss�m llfl thzy�°nOt l--•bear in the ` p of the sin .me writtenadvertisin'�copy,. The overall Mei ht of a freesttaandipq §lin '—r-'_ig'n structure - the grade directly below_• the_ _ _sn t-- °-the 4 is measuYed from m.M__ sl n structure and shall hi hest Dint of--the sin or incLlule_arch_architectural and- -structural embellishments. � shall be within a sin le: continuous Wall Sigris•_ The! area _•-- straight: line eumetr^ is Pry` u-e- which rer..__i_nieter com os_� -�'f ani If i�he sr n enhe closes the 'extreme vidualtlet er's or.`__s imbols us1-ng t�ta^^ia��-n�__area 3 igcom used of in ___- ----- _ (. trhe area within the erimeter of back nd with or without added deco.... ration, _._�------ shall be calculated by measuring all sumbols and let-ter$ 0':-°t- her deco"'_"�:_ lnclud____ r<g.l° = Special Condition Signs 18,114.090 P clition Si ns shall have secia__.1°r--uni ue dimensional Special Co___n �_.• or other requirements imp°sed loc, a_tional illumination maximum___ number'— on"them i_n addition to the re ulations contained in this Chapter;• uP_._.._rBillboard. Signs. Outdoor advertising] _.-oard [Outdoor, Advertising Signs. (a) [ are shall be as follows: Billboard sign regulations [' ] r outdoor advertising] Billboard signs` (1) Zones Permitted [ in a C-G commercial tone or [are] shall be permitted only and I-H 'industrial zones. maximum height of an [outdoor- advertising] (2) Height. The thirty--five] 35 feet from bill____ board sign shall not exceed [' the ground level at its base. (3) Size. an outdoor The maximum sign dimensions °f [ [twelve] 12 (A) a billboard sign shall be [ advertising] --Gwent five] 25 feet in length feet in height _ [and Y--fiv foundations) or a total (excluding supports three hundred] 300 square feet maximum sign arca of [ per face. be in (B) [Outdoor advertising] Billboard signs may[fourteen] 14 hei ht and feet in g in area to qg feet in length or a total maximum [forty-eight] five 675 square of [six hundred seventy ] sign area oriented feet per face where permitted as fre��way- signs. ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 - PAGE 16 - - [(C) On freeway-oriented signs, cutouts may project beyond the displaysurface and may add up to one-third additional area of permitted display surface and further may extend five and one—half feet above, four feet below or two feet to either side of the display surface, provided that the thirty-five foot maximum height' limit; is not exceeded by such cutouts.] (4) Locations Permitted. (A) [Outdoor advertising] Billboard signs [are only] shall be permitted to locate on and within 100 feet of [orient; to] Oregon State Expressway No. 2.17 and/or Interstate Freeway No. 5[.) rights-of--ways. (B) [Outdoor advertising] Billboard signs shall riot have more than one display surface facing in the same traffic direction on any one premises. (C) For the purpose of this provision and for the purposes of applying the spacing limitations or density limitations which follow, ' a single [outdoor` advertising] billboard structure on which two display surfaces are attached back-to—back [is] shall be considered ,as one [outdoor advertising] billboard sign and with one display surface facing one traffic direction. Lf a proposed billboard si nLs) is`within 660 feet of the public right•2f--wa of a�state highway then any necessary permit(s) from the State. HigFiway Division shall be obtained, - (5) [Outdoor advertising] Billboard signs shall not be located within [three hundred] 300 feet [or] of another [outdoor advertising] billboard sign on the opposite side of the street or highway or within [five hundred] _500 feet of another [outdoor advertising] billboard sign on the same side of the [street or] highway. (A) For purposes of applying this limitation, distances shall be measured as a radius from a sign. (B) Where two or more signs are in violation of these spacing provisions, the first lawfully constructed, erected and maintained shall be permitted to remain. (6) [Outdoor advertising] Billboard signs shall have all metal structures; provided, however, that the display surface or display surfaces and the .stringers used for the support of the display surfaces together- with cutouts may be made of other materials. (7) [Outdoor advertising] Billboard signs are not permitted as roof signs. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 - PAGE 17 -- ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (8) All signs, together with all of their supports, braces, guys and anchor's shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in a safe condition, ;. (A) All signs and the site upon which they aro located shall be maintained in a neat, clean and attractive conditions. (B) Signs shall be kept: free from excessive rust, corrosion, peeling paint or, other surface deterioration. (C) The display surfaces of all signs shall be kept neatly painted or posted. (b) Bench Signs. Bench signs [are] shall only be permitted at designated transit stops in commercial, industrial, and multifamily zones where no bus shelter exists, (1) There shall be no more than one bench sign per allowable transit stop. 2 (2) Placement of the bench sign shall riot interfere with pedestrian traffic or [traffic vision.] be located within a vision clearance area or a public right—of—way. (3) Application for a bench sign shall include the signature of the ' affected property owner and proof of liability g insurance. t. The _si n area is limited to a total of 14._s uq are _feet. [(c) Incidental Signs. ,Incidental signs shall 'riot exceed twelve inches in height and eighteen inches in width and shall be limited to four signs attached to a permitted free standing sign.] [(1) Incidental signs as described -above, are permitted as wall signs.] [(2) The total combined area shall not exceed six square feet.] [(d) Political Signs. Signs relating to the nomination and election of any individual for a political office or advocacy of any measure to be voted upon at an election shall be allowed under the following conditions:] [(1) Such signs shall be temporary in nature and shall be removed within ten days after the election.] [(2) Such signs shall not exceed twelve square feet in residential zones and thirty—two square feet in all other areas.] i [(3) No political sign shall be erected within or on any public property or right—of—way or affixed to any pole, post or standard located within or on public property or right—of-way.] ORDINANCE N0. 88—OS - PAGE 10 - ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) Balloons One inflatable stationar balloon or one_cluster of children'$ balloons fir�ml�ied..^. down _shall be allowed onlyif a_11 of- ..the_ following 3 conditionbare satrsfiedL. Ly�of Tigard sign permit is obtained for each 2 Each owner or legal occu ant :of property •°r buildinct sha___11 b? allowed one balloon' er_ye_ars. 3 A balloon i n shall be allowed to remain u_ C�for a period of no longer than seven dans-, i Balloons ma be permitted a_5 roof signs with a_ cit Y slgn eL- r—Mlt' The sizeof�_balluon shall nof exceed 25 feetin h___ ei�ghi�% 4 �)- The balloon shall be tied or 'mounted directl to a structure or the grou� nd and shall not be allowed to float in the air higher than?5 feet above the nearest building roof line, rs____�EleCtronic Message Center' (variable__ messa� I Electronic Message Cente sin regulations shall be asfollows: 1 Zones Permitted. Electronic Messa a Center si ns shall be permitted E � only in the C-G and CBD. zones. , area of an electronic Height and Area. The mabemthat ewhien is hiclint stipulated in subsection message center sign shall _ Locations Permitted. Electronic messa a centers shall be a, llowed to substitute for one freestanding sign or one wall sign., One electronic message centeesr, sin either freestanding or wall, _- shall 1 be allowed per premix Light Patterns. n "chaser effect" shall be...prohibited. Travelili htatterns Messa es and animation shall be dis la ed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration. e Freeway—oriented Si ns. Freeway—oriented sin regulations shall be as fol^ 1_ows permit from the State of Oregon under the Anyone who qualifies for a _ provisions Of the Ore on Motorist Information Act need not seek royal from the City of Tic[RE separate a� Zones Permitted. Freewa —oriented si ns shall be permitted only in the C—G I_p I—L and I—H zoning districts. to Locall be Rsmi� ations Permitted. Freech—odic ct ed yl�utns shHiGhwaY 217 and/or locate on ro erties_ Wh --� Interstate Freeway No 5 rights—of—wa; ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 — PAGE 19 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) L41 Any uses which are not abutting but which will be located within 1,000 feet of the Interstate Highway 5 and HighwM 217 ri hcy t-of--was and which are oriented towards Interstate `Highway 5 or Highway 217 shal1 be allowed to apply for a freewaM-oriented sign throw hwthe Sign Code Exception process. Height. The maximum height of a freewdy—oriented si n shall not exceed 35 feet from the ground level at its base. Total area A total maximum sign area of 120 square feet per face (240 square feet total) shall be allowed. If the 'si n his abillboard 'then the pLqvi2ionof Subsection 18.114.090(a)�3 (6) shall appy. L7) Freeway—oriented' signs -shall not have more than one_dis la surface facing in the same traffic direction on any one premise. lZ on freeway-oriented signs, cutouts may project beyond the display surface and may add up to one-third additional area of permitted display surface.., and further may extend five and one-half- feet above, four feet below or two feet to either side of the display surface, provided that the 35 foot maximum height limit is not exceeded by such cutouts. (� Freeway—oriented signs are not permitted as roofer tenant, temporary, balloon and awning signs. 10 Permits required. Freeway-•oriented signs shall be allowed only by an administrative approval of a site development review or, by approval of 'a sign code exceptionnbby the Commission 111Sign permits shall be required for- all freeway—oriented signs. .Cf Awning Signs, Zones Permitted Awning signs shall be permitted in all zoning districts Height. Awning signs (copy) ma not extend above the upper surfaces of the awning structure They may be hung below the awning if the sign clears the sidewalk by at least eight and one—half feet. Lighting Awning signs may be internally or externally illuminated. gjq.httof Way Awning Signs may extend into the public right—of•-wad six and one—half feet or two—thirds of the distance to the roadway, whichever is less. However, no sign may extend within two feet of the roadway. State Highway Division approval shall be necessary for awning signs on state highways. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 - PAGE 20 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) c� Flush Pitched "Roof" Bich._ Zonin District, Allowed in all zoning districts, 44— Height, The face of flush pitched "roof" signs Ilajnot extend more than six inches above the roof line. PlacementsFlush' pitched "roof" signs shall be Parallel to the build in face: they_may nam expend beyond the building, wall, Such surfaces shall be considered part of a 'wall surface in the calculation of total wall area. Attachment. Such sicgns shall be attached to a_mansard or other near-vertical roof where the roof- angle is cgreater• than 45 degrees from horizontal. All Coderp ovisionsplacable to wall signs shall also be applicable to this type of sign. 18.114.100 Temporary Signs {a) Authorization. The Director [is] shall be empowered to authorize temporary signs not exempted by Section 18.114,060. The Director shall" attach such conditions to the issuance of a permit for a temporary sign as may be 'necessary to assure discontinuance of the use of the sign in accordance with the terms of the authorizatiorn, and to assure substantial compliance with the purpose of this title (b) Issuance Authority: (1) The ,Director may issue temporary sign permits which shall terminate within [sixty] 60 days from the date of issuance; a (2) No permit; shall be issued-for a period longer than [sixty] 60 days, but a permit may be renewed by the Director upon a showing of good cause for the continuation of the temporary permit. [(c) Required Conditions. Applicants for temporary sign permits shall submit such evidence as may be required to enable the Director- to determine that one or more of the following conditions exists:] [(1) The need for the temporary sign is the direct result of a casualty loss;] [(2) The applicant has lost leasehold occupancy rights;] [(3) The need for a temporary sign is to bring to the attention of the public a special sale, a special service, or a special event which is compatible with the business;] i [(4)] Types and locations of temporary signs [are] shall be as { follows: E c ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 PAGE 21 ZOA 87--07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) ( [(A)] The total number, of temporary signs shall not exceed four for any one business at any one period of time. 52� The total area of one'freestanding temporary sign shall not exceeds Six square feet per face in residential zones. 32 square feel per face in commercial and industrial zones [(B) The total area of one freestanding sign shall not: exceed L-welve square feet and for wall signs eighteen square feet.] _ { C3� [(C)] ` See Subsection 18.114:015(c)[(43)] �9Z, Temporary Signs, for, [definition of] types approved. { Temporary_ wall signs shall not exceed 30 square feet in area. ._ Banners Banners may be allowed as temporary stens provided they meet the dimensional r_z'quirements fur temporary wall signs�(30 square feet maximum area) and a fi sign permit has been granted where required. A balloon as provided in Subsection 18.114.090 c R [(D)] Location shall be as approved by the Director [Building Official] [Sign clutter-, blanketing, and shabby E appearances of signs shall be avoided.] [(i) Foundation inspections shall be made; after, all required excavations, for-in work, bolt settings are completed and ready to receive concrete.] [(ii) All anchorages shall be left exposed for inspection.] [(iii) Electrical inspection shall. be made by the agency issuing electrical permits.] [(iv) Final inspection shall be called for by the applicant when all work is completed. This inspection shall cover- all items required by the Building Official under State law or City ordinance such as the locations, landscaping if required and general compliance with the approved plans and requirements of this title.] Set Attachment' Temporary signs may not be permanently attached to the ground buildings or other structures. 18.114.110 Nonconforming Signs ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 22 - ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (a) Except as provided in this Chapter, signs ,in existence on March 20, 1978, in accordance with [according to] Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16,_ which do riot conform to the provisions of this Chapter, but which_ were constructed, erected, or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations, shall be regarded as nonconforming signs which may continued until March 20, 1988. (b) Signs in existence on January ll, 1971, which 'do riot conform to the provisions of this Chapter, but which were constructed, erected. or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations, were regarded as nonconforming signs and could be _ continued for a period of ten years from January 11, 1971. All such signs which were riot brought into compliance with the standards in Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16 and the extensions granted are now in violation of this Chapter. (G) Signs located on premises annexed into the City after .January 11, 1971, which do not comply with the provisions of this Chapter, shall' be brought into compliance with this Chapter within a period of ten years after the effective date of the annexation. (d) Any sign which is [structurally altered,] maintained, relocated, or replaced shall immediately be brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this Chapter, except, the repairing and restoration of a sign on site or away from the site [s] to a safe condition. Any part of a sign or sign structure for normal maintenance shall be permitted without loss of nonconforming status. For purposes. of this Code, a-sign fi ce or message chancie shall be determined by the following: ) AAAssign face or message change on a nonc0nf-orming sign is not allowed as an alteration when the affectedproper will be sold or transferred and the business will .not remain the same; A sign face or message change shall therefore be allowed as an alteration only for existing conforming signs and for nonconforming signs prior to their amortization expiration date; No sign permit shall be required for allowable sign face 0r message changes. Should a nonconforming sign or sign structure or nonconforming portion of structure be destroyed or repaired by any means to_an extent of more than 50 percent of its replacement cost, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this Code. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 23 — ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) I (� [(e)] Signs in existence on the effective date of [the ordinance codified in] this Chapter- which do riot comply with provisions regulating flashing " signs; - use of par spotlights or rotating beacons; rotating and revolving signs; flags, banners, streamers or strings of lights__ ,(or temporary or,incidental -signs) shall be made to conform within [ninety] 90 days from the effective date of [the ordinance codified in] this Chapter. [(f)] [Outdoor Advertising] Billboards. Signs in existence ` on the effective date of [the ordinance codified in] this Chapter- which do not comply with the provisions of Subsection 18.114.090 (a)(4)(A) ,shall be permitted to remain along U.S. Ijighway 99W only until March 31, 1998, at which time such signs shall_ be brought intq_.,onformit . 18,114.120 Sign Removal Provisions - Nonconforming and Abandoned Signs (a) All signs erected after the effective date of [the ordinance codified in] this title, which are in violation of any provision of [the] this ordinance, shall be removed or brought into conformance, upon written notice by the Director [or designee]. (b) All signs which do not comply with this Chapter, but were erected prior to the effective date of this ordinance, shall be removed or brought into - conformance within [sixty] Go days from written notice by certified mail given by the Director [or- duly authorized representative], (c) If the owner of sign, building, structure, or premises fails to comply,with the written order, the Director [or designee] may then cite the owner into court subject to Chapter 18.24, Enforcement. The following exceptions apply: (1) Section 18.114.110, ` Nonconforming Signs, provides for certain time limits and other conditions for certain signs as described therein. (2) Any sign that by its condition or location presents an immediate or serious danger- to the public, by order of the Building Official, it shall be removed or repaired within the time [he] the Buildin Official may specify. In the event the owner of such sign cannot be found or refuses to comply with the order to remove, the Building Official shall then have the dangerous sign removed and the owner cited for- noncompliance and recovery of any damage or' expense. (3) Temporary Signs: All temporary signs shall be removed [or repaired] as provided in Subsection 18.114.10Oj§j j (d) Any person who owns or leases a sign structure shall remove such sign [and sign] structure ` when [either] the business that it advertises has discontinued business [in the city or the business that it advertises is no longer conducted in or upon the premises upon which such sign is located]. ORDINANCE N0. X88-06 — PAGE 24 — 'l0A 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (1) If the ,person who owns or leases such sign fails to remove it as provided in this Section, the Director shall give the owner of the building, structure or premises upon which such sign :is located, [sixty] 60 days [']`writtennotice to remove (2) If the sign has not been removed at the expiration of the [sixty] LOdays [-'] notice, the Director [or designee] may remove such "sign at cost to the owner of the building, structure or premises. (3) Signs which are in full compliance with City sign t regulations which the successor to a person's business agrees to maintain as provided in :his Chapter need not be removed in accordance with this Section. (4) Costs incurred by the City due to removal, may be made a lien against the " land or ,pr•emises on which such sign is t located, after notice and hearing and may be collected or foreclosed in the same manner- as liens otherwise entered in I4 the liens docket of the City. 1 18,114.130 Zoning District Regulations j (a) [Permitted Signs.] No sign of any character shall be permitted in 4 an R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2s or R-1 zone except the following: k [(1) Nameplates. Sign bearing only property numbers, names of i occupants of the premises or other identification of the premises not having a commercial connotation not exceeding a combined area of four- square feet-1 Wall sign(s). May riot exceed a combined total area of four square feet._ [(2.) Real Estate Signs. One on—site temporary sign for each street frontage offering the premises for sale, lease or inspection by the public; provided, that the total area of- such sign does not exceed six square feet in area. Such signs may also be modified to indicate that the property has been sold ] [(3)] [Permanent housing complex identification signs.] Ever housing complex shall be allowed one permanent freestanding [ground] sign, at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right—of—way, with the site property landscaped, [denoting the development name] and not exceeding [thirty—two] 32 square feet in area. Illumination may be approved as long as it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the Director considering the purpose of the zone. ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 — PAGE 25 ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 0 (3/21/88) [(q)] [Permanent subdivision identification signs. One] Every platted subdivision shall be—al low 9d one permanent, freestanding [ground] sign, , at each entry paint to the subdivision from the ' public right•-of-way; with the site properly landscaped, [denoting the development name] and not exceeding [thirty-two] 3 square feet in area. Illumination may be approved as long as it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the Director considering the purpose of the zone. Nonresidential signs one illuminated or nonilluminated freestandi q sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under the, site development review or conditional use process. Wall signs may not exceed five percent of the dross area of the wall face on which the sign is is mounted. [(5) Real estate directional signs. Temporary real estate signs advertising an openhouse and located off the premises, limited to a sign area of six square feet and a maximum dimension of four' feet may be erected and maintained, provided` the display of such sign shall be only during r those hours the property is available for inspection.] [(A) No other off—premises _directional signs shall be allowed. No permits are required for such signs, k but the Directormayestablish reasonable rules and regulations to prohibit sign clutter, erection of unsafe` signs or other problems in connection with j the erection of real estate directional signs.] ' V1i [(B) Such rules and regulations shall be on file with the i City Recorder.] i i [(6) Religious Assembly.] F i [(A) Freestanding signs for religious assemblies and educational institutions in residential zones are limited to sixteen feet in height and sixty—five square feet in area per sign face.] [(B) Religious assemblies and educational institutions are permitted to have readerboards but not in excess of the allowable sign area.] [(C) Wall signs shall not exceed five percent of the front wall area and not be permitted on side or- rear walls.] Directional signs onprivate property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining_ public streets. One sign with an area of four square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway. Said signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas. j; ORDINANCE NO. 88-06_ — PAGE 26 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) # L [(7)] Signs exempt from pei"mit. ' The signs specified in Subsection 18,114.060(a) [are] shall be allowed", subject to any restrictions imposed by this title. 7� Tempor•ary signs as per Sections 18.114.090 and 18.114.100. Lawn signs as per Subsections 18.114.060 a S§) and (b)(2), f Special condition si ns as per Section 18.114.090. 10 Additional allowed signs; awning sign(sZ, painted wall` -sign(s), monumer}t (b) Multifamily _Rosidential Zones. No sign [is] shall be permitted in F an R--12, R-25, or R-40 zone except for the following: {, [(1) Permanent residential nameplates identifying the premises. Totalsigning on a premises shall not exceed one square foot of area per dwelling unit.] [(2) Incidental signs. Such signs shall only be permitted when attached to a permanently affixed sign structure or to the wall of the building.] [(3) Real estate signs. One outside sign offering the premises for sale providing that the total area of such sign does not exceed twelve square feet. Such signs may be modified: to indicate that the property has been sold.] ill Wall Signs) May not exceed a combined total area of one square foot per- dwelling unit and mal _not proiect from the wall face. Every housing complex shall. be allowed one—permanent freestanding_sign, at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right:-of-ways with the site propertylandscaped and not exceeding 32 sauar,e feet in area per, sign fjace. Illumination may be approved as lonq as it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the Director considering the purpose of the zone. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed one permanent freestanding sign, at each entrypoint to the subdivision from the public right-of--way, with the site properly landscaped,and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sican face . Illumination may be approved as long ..as-,..it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the Director considering theu� rpose of the zone. (4) Nonresidential signs. One illuminated or nonilluminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and [thirty-two] 32 square feet in area per- sign face [identifying any nonresidential use] permitted in a multifamily residential zone, if such use has been approved under- the site development review or conditional use process. Wall signs may not exceed five percent of the gross wall area on which the sign is to be mounted. ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 - PAGE 27 - "LOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) ( [(5) Real estate directional ,signs and Religious signs, in accordance with subdivisions (4)_& (5) of subsection (a).] [(6)] Directional [or instructional] signs on private property when ,such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. One sign with an area of four square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway, [The] Said signs shall be 'consistent with Chapter 18.102, Visual Clearance F r= Areas. [(7)] Signs exempt: from permit. The signs specified in Subs ' lon 18.114,060(a) [are] si,all be allowed, subject to t any rL-s;.rictions imposed by this title. Temporary as per Sections 18.114.090 and 18.114.100. k Lawn signs a5 per Subsection 18114.060 La)_(Q and Sep cial condition si ns as per Section 18.114`.090. ainted wall 10 Additional allowed -signs. Awning sign(s ,_e F sign(s), monument sin s ' (c) Commercial Zones. No sign shall be permitted in a C—G and CBD zone except for the following: (1) Freestanding signs. ; (A) Freestanding signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties zoned commercial and industrial. g ' (i) One multifaced, freestanding sign [identifying the principal - goods, products, facilities or, services available on the premises, is] shall Le permitted [on the premises,] subject to conditions and limitations as stated herein. (ii) A readerboard assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign. (B) Area Limits, The maximum square footage of signs l [is] shall be [severity] 70 square feet per face or a total of [one hundred forty] 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into public right--of--way space. r (C) Area Limit Increases. The sign area may be increased one square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line the sign is adjacent to. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement may be taken from a point which is [fifteen] 15 feet from the pavement. This r increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of, [ninety] 90 square feet per face or a total of [one 0 square feet for all faces. } ,i hundred eighty] 18 q � ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 28 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (D) Height Limits. Freestanding signs located next to thepublic right—of—way shall not exceed [twenty] 20 feet in height. Height may be increased one foot in height for each ten feet of setback from the property line or a point [fifteen] 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of [twenty-two] 22 feet in height. (2) Wall Signs. (A) Allowable Area, Wall signs, including illuminated readerboards, may be erected or- maintained but shall not exceed in gross area [twenty--five) '15 percent of any building face [the -total area of the wall face upon which the sign is attached] on„_which the sign is to be mounted. (B) Wall signs may not project more than [eighteen] -18 inches from the wall or extend` above the wall to which they are attached. [(C) In buildings_where one or more tenant(s) occupy a portion of a building 'which ,does riot include any portion of an -interior wall having exposure to -a public street, allowable wall sign area will be computed in the following manner:] [(i) Each tenant not having building frontage may have a wall _sign on the wall having street exposure (front wall) provided it does not exceed in sign area that portion of sign area permitted that front wall tenant having the smallest proportion of allowable sign area.] [(ii) In: this type of building the allowable proportion of front wall sign area shall be computed as fifteen percent of the total building face.] [(iii) A wall sign program shall be established for all multitenant buildings; no new permit shall be issued until such a program is established.] [(iv) On preexisting buildings, each new tenant will adhere to the established program.] [(D)] If it is determined under the development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional [fifty] 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted. No .copy will be permitted, however, in the additional area permitted. For Purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos, and letters. ORDINANCE N0, 88-06 - PAGE 29 ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/08) CU (E) Painted wall ,Signs. Wallsigns painted directly onto the wall surface shall not exceed in gross wall area [fifteen] 15 percent of the face of the building they are painted - upon, and the vertical dimension of the sign cannot exceed ,[twenty] 20 percent of the height of the wall. [(F) One freestanding or wall sign will be permitted offering` the _premises for sale or rent. Total area of such sign shall not exceed seventy square feet.] (3) Directional [or instructional] signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and; exits for, motorists on adjoining' public streets. One sign with an area of four square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway. Said signs shall be consistent with Chapter- 18.102, Visual Clearance Areas. Electronic Message Centers as per Subsection 18.114.090(4 [(4)] Signs exempt from permit. The signs ' specified in Subsection 18.114.060(a) [are] shall be allowed, subject to any restrictions imposed by this title. Temporary signs as per Sections 18.114.090 and 18.114. 100. Lawn signs as per Subsection 18.114.060 a 6 and UKZ_ J881 special condition signs as per Section 18.114.090. Additional Allowed Signs: Awning sign(s), flush pitched °roofer Signs) freeway.--oriented51 n(S) tenant ' sign(S), monument signs) projecting sign(s). (d) Commercial-Professional Zone. No sign shall be permitted in a C—P zone except for the following: [(1) There shall be not more than one square foot of sign area for each one hundred square feet of floor area within the building or buildings to be identified. All signs shall not exceed fifteen square feet per face or a total of thirty square feet for all sign faces if both faces are used.] [(2) No sign shall project above the roof line or extend over a public sidewalk or right—of—way. All faces of signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located and to which the sign pertains.] [(3) Signs may be painted or otherwise applied directly to a wall providing such sign is an integral part of building design and approval is obtained for such sign under the development review process.] [(4) No billboards are permitted.] ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 30 — ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) a ' [(5) Special types .;of signs per Section 18.114.090 may be approved underthedevelopment review process.] [(6) Signs within a planned development district for the specific purpose of advertising the premises for sale or rent, site identification, building identification, tenant identification and traffic direction may be permitted within such planned development as approved in the detailed development plan subject to approval by the Director, ' providing that an integrated sign theme iscarriedout compatible with the overall development and consistent with the approved general plan and program.] [(7) Directional or instructional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. One sign with an area of four square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway. The signs shall be consistentwith Chapter--18.102,'Visual Clearance Areas.] [(8) The signs specified in Section 18.114.060(x) are allowed, subject to any restrictions imposed by this title.] Freestanding signs. Freestanding sign 'shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties C—P_ _i)_ One multifaced, freestand' sign per premises ng shall be permitted, subject to conditions and limitations as stated herein. ii Freestanding signs in the C—P cone shall only be allowed as freestanding or those exceptions listed under subsection 18.114.130(d)(4). Area Limits. The maximum squuare footage of so freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into public right—of--way space. ) Area Limit Increases. The sign area my be increased one square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line the sign is adjacent to. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement may be taken from a point which is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 50 square feet per face or a total of 100 square feet for all faces. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 - PAGE 31 ZOA 87--07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) Height Limits. Freestanding signs located next to the public right &V shall not exceed 'eight 'feet ' in height Height may be increased one, foot in height for each ten feet , of - setback from the pro 2rj lane or a point 15 feet from the 'edge of pavement whichever is less to-a maximum of ten feet in'height. Wall Signs . Allowable Area. Wall signs including—illuminated read erboards, may be erected or maintained but shall i not exceed in ar: a five percent of an building on which the sign is to_be mounted. LB) Wall 'signs shall be para1121 to the face of the building upon which the sign is located. F If it is determinedunden the development- review process that the wall sign's visual_appeal and overall design quality would be served, an ; additional 50% of the allowable sign area may be , permitted. No copy will beep r,mitted, however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this ; subsection, includes _.symbols, logos, and � letters. ' D) Painted Wall Signs. Wall signs painLed`.directly onto the wall surface shall not exceed in gross wall area five percent of the face of the building they are painted upon, and the vertical dimension of the sicgn cannot exceed 20 percent of the height of the wall Billboard signs shall be allowed only as provided in z Subsection 18.114.090(x) of this Chapter, Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify`driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoinin public streets. One sin with an area of four square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway. Said signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18..02, Visual Clearance Areas. Temporary signs as per Sections 18.114.090 and 18.114.100. ' Lawn signs as per Subsections 18.114.060(a)(6) and (b)(2). Special condition signs as per Section 18.114.090. Additional allowed signs. Awning sign(s), freeway—oriented sign(s), tenant signs), monument sign(s)_ (e) Neighborhood Commercial Zone. No sign [is] shall be permitted in a C—N zone except for the following: ORDINANCE N0. 86-06 — PAGE 32 — ZOA 87-•07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) [(I) The area of all signs shall not exceed fifteen square feet per side, or a total of thirty square feet for' all sign faces if more than one face is used.] [(2) Free standing signs may be permitted in lieu of building— mounted signs, subject to specific approval under the design review process.] [(3) Special types of signs per Section 18.114.090 may be approved- subject to a specific approval under the development review process.] [(4) Directional or instructional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify- driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. One sign with an area of four square feet per face 'shall be permitted per driveway. The signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.102, Visual Clearance Areas.] [(5) Signs exempt from permit, The signs specified in Section 18.114:060(a) shall be allowed, subject to any restrictions ' imposed by this title'.] (�' fr•eestanding signs.. (A) Freestanding ' signs_ shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties zoned commercial and industrial. Ji) One multifaced, freestanding sign per premises shallbe permitted suh�iect to conditions and limitations as stated herein. i Freestanding signs in the C—N zone shall-only be allowed as freestanding signs or exceptions listed under subsection 18,114.130 e)(4). LBI Area Limits. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into public right—of—way space_ Area Limit Increases. The sign area may be increased one square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line the sign is adjacent to. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement ma _be taken from a point which is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 50 square feet per face or a total of 100 square feet for all faces. ORDINANCE NO. 88--06 - PAGE 33 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21188) Frepstanding signs located nex_ t _. a ; Height Linri1�_:S :_.__-•------Shall ' theuh1 i�c r_aghi-of-way Shall not exceed 20 feet in ne foot Jn hei ht. Nei ht: 'ma b seii�.back from ____ he_pro erty ... ine for each ten feet of avemeni paint 15 feet fro the ea�_nf p" F whichever is less to a m__aximum of 22 feet in he y • t i Wa 11 S iqn sillujili R Anated llowable Area. Wall Sihall or nain ain�d_bui.�st hall rreeaderboards ma be ere inV not exc_ eeo In-gr°s$area ten_percent of any__buildg -• fi ac_ e_on which the sign i_�� f ' to be mounted. ¢ arallel to the face of the y Wall_sus 's -hall be p =----- - k build in u on„ which located. the sr----•anis loc_� ._ If- it is determitied.under t`he deevelopmen�_-nt review - _wa11 signs visual a��? process t;hat the _ ---- an eve_ call_ _dosigri_-.qualit�y_ Would - -fie 5-ervec ` a additional 50 percen of- the 'allowable sign area my. a be _,perm�ited• No Cnp_y..will,be ermined however For• ur oses of i in the additional area---pet—ludesds symbols, s� and this subsection "SO y',"incl letters. minted Wall Signs, Wallsigns�.pa�.nted dir____?��lu. S�. P a ..._._- ---- onio the wall surface the Tacetofx the build�nall ss_ area ten percent n are ai_ n_ted up_.°n, and the vertical di,__ ►nensi°n of the sigr_„ cannot exceed 20 p_-er•cent of_the height of the tion 3 r 113.114.090 of th,i.s Special-types__of signs as undereCth-�-e-y�iwelopme_:treview Chapter incl_be---app ed anal signs nn pr�v__ate._pr°perty when such signs arm Direti entrances and_ exits__ solely_ designed to identify driveway Tor n�.,torists on ad oinin ublic streets. One sign with an area of four square feed ber e consice stent e with PeM1tCha ter drivewa Said si ns 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas. Temporar� signs as per_ :�ectinT n_s 16.114.090 and 16.114.100.. Lawn si ns as er Subsection 18.114.060(a)_L and b 2 - Billboards as or Section 18.114.090(4 ,. jol special signs as per r�Seetinn18�11A.090. cial condition g Additional allowable e_.__signs: Awn in si n�)_ 1 tenant � Ss i n mom t sin s t, ORDINANCEN0. 8_g-�06-_ PAGE 34 - ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (f) Industrial Zones. No signs [are] shall be permitted in an I--P, I—L.,_ or, I-H zone except for the following: (1) Freestanding signs. (A) Freestanding signs shall have certain 'limitations and conditions when permitted on 'properties zoned commercial and industrial. (i) - One multifaced, freestanding; sign [identifying the principal goods, products, facilities or services available on the Promises,] shall be permitted [on the premises,] subject to conditions and limitations as stated herein. (ii)-A readerboard assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign. (B), Area Limits. The maximum "square footage of signs shall be [seventy] 70 square feet per face or a' total of [one hundred forty] 140' square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a-property line into public right--of—way space. (C) Area Limit Increases. The sign area may be increased one square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front 'property 'line the sign is adjacent to. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement' may be taken from a point +' which is ,[fifteen] 15 feet from, the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of [one hundred eighty] qQ square feet for all faces. (D) Height Limits. Freestanding signs located next to the public right--of—way shall not exceed [twenty] 2O feet in height. Height may be increased one foot in height for each ten feel: of setback from the property line or a point [fifteen] 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever, is less, to a maximum of [twenty—two] 22 feet in height. (2) Wall Signs. (A) Allowable Area. Wall signs, including illuminated realrds, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area [fifteen] 15 percent of [the building frontage occupied by the tenant] any building face on which the sign is to be mounted. (B) Wall signs may not project more than [eighteen] 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 35 — ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) [(C) In buildings where one or more tenant-(s) occupies a portion of abuilding which does not include any portion' of an exterior wall having exposure to a public street, allowable wall sign area will be computed in the following manner:] [(i) Each tenant riot having building frontage may have a wall sign on the wall having street exposure (front wall) provided it does not exceed in sign area that portion of sign area permitted that front wall tenant having the smallest proportion of allowable sign area.] [(ii) In this type of building the allowable proportion of front wall `sign area shall be computed- as fifteen percent of the total building face.] [(iii) A wall sign program shall be established for all multitenant buildings; no new permit shall be issued until such a program is established,] [(iv) On preexisting buildings, each new tenant will adhere to the established program.] [(D)] If it is determined under the development review process that the wall' sign' s visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional [fifty] 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted. No copy will ; be permitted, however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos, and letters. S.D.. [(E)] Painted Wall Signs. Wall signs painted directly onto the wall surface shall not exceed in gross wall area [fifteen] 15 percent of the face of the building they are painted upon, and the vertical dimension of the sign cannot exceed [twenty] 20 percent of the height of the wall. [(F) One freestanding or wall sign will be permitted offering the premises for sale or rent. Total area of such sign shall not exceed seventy square feet.] (3) Directional signs [or instructional] on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. One sign with an area of four square feet ,Ler face shall be permitted per, driveway, [The] Said signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.102, Visual Clearance Areas. (4) Signs exempt from _permit. The signs specified in Subsection 18,114.060(a) [are] shall be allowed, subject to any restrictions imposed by this title. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 -PAGE 36 – ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) i Mai 5 Ten�or�a�-signs as per Sections 18.114.090 and 18.114.100. Lawn signs as per Subsections 10.114.060(a).(6) and b 2). L61 �Pecial condition signs as per Section 18.114.090 may be view process. approved under the development re F Additional Available Stens;. Awnin _sign s 1_ tenant si n(s), freeway-oriented sin s), proiecting sign(s),F monument sins monument— � (g) Other Requirements Which Shall Apply to Commercial and Industrial Zones. If it is determined under. the development review process € that the sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served while maintaining the intent and purpose of this Chapter, an additional [fifty] 50 percent of the allowable sign area and - [twenty-five] 25 percent of sign height may be permitted. No copy will be permitted in theadditional area or height. For purposes of this subsection the word "copy" includes symbols, logos,, and figures, as well as Tetters. (1) Each freestanding sign shall be surrounded by an area set aside to protect the sign from vehicles negotiating in the s parking area of the business [to which the sign relates,] and the area set aside shall be landscaped. i< M (A) The size and shape of the area set aside and the landscaping shall be represented on the plot plan required by permit and shall be subject to the review and control of the Director or his agent, under the development review_process (B) On existing siteswhere a landscape island is not feasible, ,the minimum clearance between the lowest portion of a freestanding sign and the ground [is] shall be [fourteen] 14 feet in any vehicle maneuvering area. (2) No freestanding sign, nor- any portion of any freestanding sign, shall be located or project over any portion of a street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way or property unless an exception has been granted. (3) When a premises contains more than a single tenant but is not defined as a shopping center, the provisions of a freestanding sign shall take into consideration the need for providing a signing system which is harmonious in appearance and legible. ' (A) The building owner shall provide, at his own expense, a common support for all tenant signage. (B) Up to an additional [fifty] 50 percent of sign copy area may be permitted under the design review process so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when determined that; the increased sign area will not deter from the purpose of this Chapter, ORDINANCE NO. 88-06__ W PAG[ 37 - ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) t E (�) Shopping centers or industrial parks, [defined as areas of G not less than eight business units and consisting of not 4 less than faun acres,] shall establish 'a single signing format. [(A) The sign shall include the complex name and street } number.] C(g)] Up to an additional [fifty] 50 percent of sign area may be permitted under, the development review process to adequately identify the complex when it can be determined that the increased sign area will not deter from the purposes of this Chapter. [(C)] This increase should be judged according to unique E identification needs and circumstances which necessitate additional area to make the sign sufficiently legible. [(D)] When a shopping center or industrial park has more than one main entrance on separate frontages, a second freestanding sign may be allowed under the design ' review "process. The two allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously. ) Legal owners or occupants of properties or buildings which t are not in shoppigg centers and which are directly located are proposed to be or located on a commercially and industrially ' zoned Carner___propert —iesZ, one or more contiguous tax lots located at the intersection of two or more ublic streets shall be allowed to have one free- standing sign along each street'f-rontage_accordina to the following A sign permit shall be required for each sign prior to its erection. The total combined height of two freestanding signs on the premises shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed in the same zoning district; e_ S� Neither of the signs shall exceed the sign height normally allowed in the zoning district in which the r signs are located. See Section 18.114.130. & p The total combined area of two freestanding signs on y` th premises shall not exceed 130 percent of what, is normally allowed in the same zoning district; if a premises already has two freestanding si ng s, a third sign shall not be permitted The two allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be Viewed simultaneously. Fi11 other provisions of th is Chapter p shall a 1 — c ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 PAGE 38 ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) 18.114.140 Exceptions (a) The Commission or, on review, the Council [,] may grant exceptions to the requirementsof this Chapter when the applicant demonstrates that, owing to special or, unusual circumstances relating to the design, structure, or placement of the sign in relation to other structures or land uses or, the natural features of the land, the literal interpretation of this Chapter• would interfere with the communicative function of the sign without corresponding public benefit. (b) When the Commission or the -Council approves an exception the rights thereby given to the applicant shall continue to exist and to belong to the applicant or any other owner of the land for, a period of one year from the date of final approval. (1) If, at the expiration of one year from the date of approval, construction of the structure or initiation of the use giving rise to the need for the exception has not begun, the rights given by the exception approval shall terminate without further action by the City, the Commission, or the Council (2) [The] Said rights shall also terminate at or after the expiration of one year from approval if, though commenced within one year, -construction ceases and is not resumed within [sixty] 60 days. 18,114.145 Approval Criteria for Exceptions to Sign Code (a) The Planning Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an exception to the Sign Code based on findings that at least one of the following criteria are satisfied: (1) The proposed Sign Code "Exception is necessary because a conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance with the Sign Code standards; (2) The proposed exception to the height limits in the Sign Code is necessary to make the sign visible from the street because of the topography of the site; (3) A freestanding sign to be located on a secondary access drive that serves the subject property from a street other than the street to which the business is oriented. (4) Up to an additional [twenty-five] 25 percent of sign area or height may be permitted to adequately identify the business when it is determined that the increase will not deter from the purpose of this Chapter. This increase should be judged according to specific identification needs and circumstances which necessitate additional area to make the sign sufficiently legible. The increase(s) shall not conflict with any other nondimensional standards or restrictions of this Chapter. ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 PAGE 39 ZOA 87-07 DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) (5) The proposed sign is consistent with the criteria set forth in Subsection 18.114;130(8) of this Chapter. Thepropos--d exception-far a second freestanding sign on_an interior lot is necessary because all Of the f-ollowin applies: additional _ si ee will accommodate state-mandated advertisiney requlations or additional signage is necessary, to accommodatea�regional or national business standard-sized sign; ii) The combined height of both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of the sign height normally allowed for one freestanding sign in the same z ninq district; however, neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same zoning district; Neither sign poses ' awvision clearance problem or project into the right-of--way iv Total combined sign area for both signs all not exceed 130 percent of what is normals allowed in the same zoning district; however, neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same zoning_district. _ The proposed freeway-oriented sign to be placed on property not directly abutting Interstate Highway Nu. 5 or Highw v 217 is' associated withh abusiness which demonstrably serves the traveling public. (b) In addition to the criteria in subsection (a) of this section, the Commission, or `in the Case of an Administrative Exception: the Director-, shall review all of the existing or proposed signage for the development and its relationship to the intent and purpose of this Chapter. As a condition of approval, the Commission or Director may require: (1) Removal [of] �)r alteration of nonconforming signs to achieve compliance with the standards contained in this Chapter; [and] (2) Removal or alteration of conforming signs in order to establish a consistent sign design throughout the development; and (3) Application for sign permits for signs erected without permits or removal of such illegal signs. 18.114.148 Criteria for Approval of an Administrative Exception The purpose of this section is to set forth the criteria whereby the Director is empowered to grant a Administrative Exception as i prerequisite to a sign permitfor a proposed new sign or as a means to allow the continued use of a marginally noncanfarming sin due only to its dimensions). ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 - PAGE 40 - ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21./88) i 1111[11111111,111,1 M151,111,11'11'1 MINOR I iI 61, 1 11 111 The proposed Administrative_ Exceptions) to sign height and/or il sign area does/do or•-wl not exceed by .more than :five percent the existing sig height and sign area standards that otherwise would be �appicable in the same zoning..A str•ict,Mfor the same type of Sian• , The Director shall approves approve with conditions, or dent/ an application for a Administrative Exception based on findings that one or more of the following criteriaare satisfied:_ The proposed _Administrative Exception(s) applies/apply to an existing nonconforminq_sign or a proposed new sign for a 4 develop Ing tei e (2 The proposed Administrative Exceptions) will nat _be materially detrimental to the uurposes of- this Code, be in conflict with thepolicies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same tonin district or vicinity, r L3 The proposed sign height or area Administrative Exception is for the convenience of the regional or national business which wishes to use a standard-sized sign_ f KAI The pException will not be detrimental to public safety and welfare; The ro�osed Administrative Exception' will not involve an extension into the public right—of—way; The Administrative Exception will allow a unique sin of unique design or style which will enhance the area or will be a visible landmarks s Nonconforming signs) may be allowed past the expiration of i its/their amortization date when the Director finds that: J The proposed modified signs is/are closer to conformance than the old sign in terms of a percentage reduction of its/their dimensional nonconformance; and The overall visual impact of all signs un the site f has been improved with respect to the total number and size of all signage; and E One of the Sign Code Exception criteria in Subsection 18.114.045(a) is satisfied. t When at least one of the above criteria in Subsection 18.114.148(a) is satisfied, the Director shall review all existing i and proposed signage for the development as outlined in Subsection 18.114.145(b). i 18.114.150 Sign Code Exception Application Submission Requirements A ORDINANCE NO. 88-06 — PAGE 41 - ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT 9 (3/21/88) (a) All Sipa Code Exception applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director and shall be accompanied by: (1) Three copies for review by the Director of the sign plan(s) and any necessary data or narrative which explains how the sign plan proposal conforms to the standards [:] Fifteen copie. for review by- the Planning Commission nrF the-sig flans forig ' sn code exception:- . (A) Sheet si.ze for an accessory use or structure site plan(s) and required drawings shall preferably be drawn on ;sheets not to exceed [eighteen] 18 inches by [twenty-four] 24 inchest [, and] (8) The scale of the sign site plan shall be [20, 50, 100 or 200 feet to the inch.] an engineering scale; and (C) All drawings of the sign elevations and structural components shall be ,a standard architectural scale, being one-fourth inch or one-eighth inch; (2) The required fee; and (3) A list of the names and addresses of all persons who are property' owners of record within [two hundred fifty] 250 feet' of the site. (b) The proposed sign site plan shall include the following information: (1) The location of the Proposed sign, and all existing signs on the site; (2) The location of all existing and proposed buildings on the site; (3) The location of all existing and proposed streets and rights-of•-way, including names and widths; and (4) The location of all overhead power and utility lines located on the site. (c) The proposed sign architectural plans shall include the following information: (1) The sign dimensions; (2) The materials and colors to be used; (3) The height of the sign above the ground; (4) The source and intensity of any illumination; (5) Construc+ ion drawings indicating sire of footings, anchorages and welds ORDINANCE N0, 88-06 PAGE 42 - ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) k (6) The Director, may require engineers' calculations for •sign construction, anchorage and footing requirements, including wind resistance and seismic forces, all in conformance with the requirements of the Uniform Building Codes in • accordance with Subsection 18•32.080(a). All sign structures on or, near'a building shall conform to the State Fire Life Safety requirements and the Uniform Building Code requirements of the building, structure, or, area where it is erected; and (7) All electrical illuminated signs shall bear the Underwriters Laboratory label or equivalent. 18.114.160 Sign Permit Application -Re urs ir,ements ) All applications shall be made on forms provided by tile Director, and shall be accompanied by: Two copies for review by the Director of the sign site plan(s) and two codes of the sign architectural plans: The proposed sign site plan.shall include the following information: jjj The location of the ro usedsign' and all existing freestanding, wall or other external signs on the site; ii The location of all existing and proposed buildings on the site z, The location of all 'existing and .. proposed streets and rights—of--ways' including names and widths, iv The location of all overhead power and utility lines located on the site. (v) The distance of the sign to the nearest public right(s)—of—way vi The address of the site where the sign will he located; and The name, address, and phone number of the applicant. The proposed sign architectural plans shall include the following information: The sign area dimensions;_ ii The materials and colors to be used; The height of the sign above the ground; ORDINANCE N0. 88-06 — PAGE 43 — ZOA 87-07 - DRAFT 8 (3/21/88) r iL vj The source and intensity of any illumination; Construction drawings indicating size of footirtigs, anchorages and welds; vi The address of the site where the signs will be located The name address and phone number of the applicant; and viiia t"or those cases where an existing sign is to be modified," the applicant for a sign permit shall provide documentation or verifiable woof"of,when a sin was erected" and, wherever possible shall submit a copy of the' original sign permit: Proof of a current City business tax certificate. Proof of a U.L. or equivalent label subscriber number. The required f-ee, lw/1825D _ ORDINANCE NO, 88-06 — PAGE 44 ZOA 87-07 — DRAFT' 8 (3/21/88) TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MARCH 15, 1988 1. Vice 'President Owens called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center TOWN ,HALL ROOM - 13125_SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. 2. - . ROLL CALL: Present: Vice President Owens; Commissioners Fyre, Peterson, Barber, and Castile. Absent: Commissioners Moen, " Leverett, Newton, and Rosborough.> Staff: Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Deborah Stuart, Assistant Planner; 'Diane Jelderks, Planning` Commission Secretary. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-07, Section 18.114. Signs. Review proposed amendments to Section 18.114 (Signs) of the Community Development Code. Vice President Owens explained to the audience that this hearing has been` set over fromMarch8 and the public hearing portion had been closed. She asked for staff's presentation. Senior Keith Lidera reviewed the time lines required to forward Planning Commission's recommendations to City Council for a March 28 hearing. He continued that even though thePlanningCommission had closed the public hearing portion that there are people in the audience who would like to give testimony and that the Planning Commission could reopen the public hearing portion if they so choose. He requested that Deborah Stuart co e forward and review changes that had been made to the proposal. Deborah Stuart reviewed her memo dated, March- .11, 1988. She summar zed changes that had been made to draft #5 which are now reflected in d ft #6. She continued by reviewing Exhibit II which had been submitted y Commissioner Barber. Discussion followed regarding size of temporary signs, the number of signs that could be used as temporary signs, whether to remove or leave in the obscenity section of the Code, and what size sign should be allowed on a mansard roof. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mike Carulli, Columbia Neon (OESA), .1820 East Burnside Street, 97214, explained that he represented the Oregon Electrical Sign Association , and that the changes being proposed by staff were basically acceptable. They had several concerns: 1) The maximum height for free-standing signs. They favored 25 feet which would allow for a right-of-way clearance of 13 feet 6 inches which is required by the state. 2) The requirement for engineering drawings should be changed to require engineering drawings only when a sign code exemption is required. 3) Regarding, pre-applications, they felt they should be required through the sign code exemption process only and not with PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 15, `1988 PAGE 1 each sign permit issued. 4) Since we are working-towards a neutral code, they requested that the code be reviewed in one year to resolve any problems that have developed. o Robert E. Farrell, Newport Bay Restaurant, 9750 SW Shady Lane, explained that they had taken over the Newport Bay Restaurant three years ago and had put in considerable amount of landscaping to make the site visually attractive. He received a letter stating that their boat with the painted word "Where fresh seafood comes ashore' is not a permitted use. He stated that they would cooperate, but they want it to lookgood also. They would like a provisioninthe Code which would allow them to leave the boat with the painted words as part of their landscaping. o Larry Bissett, 2004 NW Irving, Portland. Asked if the proposal had been modified to allow two free-standing signs and if any ,provision had been allowed for more than one tenant on a premise. Discussion followed. It was determined that Mr. Bissett's concerns could be covered under the administrative variance section of the Code. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Discussion followed among the Commissioners regarding leaving the requirement restricting obscenities in the Code, the height and size of signs that should be allowed on mansard roofs, the.difference between a mansard roof versus a pitched roof, a definition for an interior lot, how to encourage;the use of monuments signs, what the maximum distance a sign should be from the freeway to be considered a freeway-oriented sign, what _standards other jurisdiction use for freeway-oriented sign (staff to research), and_how variances to the Sign Code provisions will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. ` Discussion followed regarding the public testimony. Consensus of the Commission was that the height should remain at 20 feet, that the Sign Code should be reviewed after one year, and the Code does have a provision that would allow Mr. Farrell to retain his boat sign. Commission Fyre moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward draft number seven to City Council which will incorporate all Planning Commission's recommendation including the following: l) That the section prohibiting obscenities be reviewed by the City Attorney to see if it could be left in the code. 2) That the freeway oriented signs have a limit of 1,000 feet from the freeway, and that a recommendation be made to the City Council to have the Code reviewed within one year. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 4. MEETING ADJOURNED 9:31 PM ✓J� ' Diane M. Jelderk ; Planning Commissions Secretary ATTEST: Donnie Owens, Vice President sb/37S1D PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES LARCH 15, 1988 PAGE 2 lama AGENDA ITEM 2.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 15, 1988 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: The Tigard Planning Commission �� March 11, 1988 t. FROM: neborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planne3w SUBJECT: ZOA 87--07 DRAFT 6 The following summarizes changes I have made to draft 5 and which are now reflected in draft 6: 1. Deleted obscenities provision - 18.114.070 (d) page 14; 2. Relocated 'awning and flush" mounted "roof" sign requirements from definitions subsection (.015) to special condition , signs 18.114.090 (f) and (g), pages 20 and 21; 3. Corrected typographical errors; 4. Inserted definition of "painted wall sign" - Section 18.114.015 (c) (31), page 6; i 5. Inserted the definition for shopping center; revised roof line and flush mounted "roof" sign definitions, Section 18.114.015 (21), (40), and;(43),.pages 4 and 7; 6 Changed balloon requirements to allow one per business (riot business premises) per year - Section 18.114.090 (c), page 19; 7. Removed tenant sign provisions in commercial and industrial zoning districts- Section 18.114.130 (c) ...(d) (e) (f), pages 28 - 37; 8. Added a sign code exception criteria for a second freestanding sign on interior lots - Section 18.114.145 (a) (6), page 41; 9. Added a sign code exception criteria for the approval of a freeway-oriented sign on lots riot directly abutting I-5 or Highway 217 Section 18.114.145 (a) (7), page 42; 10. Revised 18.114.148 (c) (7) - Administrative Exception criterial for nonconforming signs - to be more specific, less vague, page 43. dj/3683D s FRAHLER INVESTMENT COMPANY William(Bill)and Alva FrahlerO Phone:244.7955 AR .�•198 10730 S.W.85th Avenue Portland,Oregon 97723 CITY OF TIGARa oLAN14I G DEPT- , March 2, 1988 , City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Or 97223 Attn: Planning Division Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner , Re: Frahler Electric Sign Dear Sirs: Attached is a letter and sketch I submitted to Mr. Liden in regards to the Frahler Electric sign. ,. Our roof sign was mounted on our original building and then we added' a second story to our office, consequently, the visibility of our sign is very.minimal. In this respect I don't believe the location of this- particular sign would in any way spoil the aesthetic qualities of Tigard. I am requesting a sign code amendment with provisions that would legalize roof signs in certain locations and a "Grandfather Clause" installation similar to our Frahler Electric sign. Respectively submitted, William M. Frahler 10730 SW 85th Ave Port]and, Or 97223 WMF/jo enol PS: Our sign is behind the second story office addition and within 20' of the ground. FRAHLER ELECTRIC COMPANY ,' ;`,;ti•, 118W S.W. GREENBEIRG ROAD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 \\ k PHONE,(503)6144627 r f February 25, 19138 _ t City of Tigard i 13125-SW.Hal I Blvd Tigard, Or 97223. Attn: Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner Planning Division City of Tigard Re: Frahler Electric Sign Dear Sir: In as much as our sign has been on the roof of a building in Tigard for 29 years, we are asking for a sign code exception application We are basing our request on the following: The full sign cannot be seen under 150 feet traveling from South to North on Greenburg Road, nor,can it be seen under 135' -traveling from North to South. The sign cannot be seen in front of the building from any distance. p We respectively submit this exception application on the basis that our sign should not be offensive to anyone in it's present location and has been in use in Tigard for 29 years. I Sincerely yours. j William M. Frahlrr ` Frahler Invesl.Bnlnt CO. fII WNF/Jo I encl : i COMMERCIAL. 1NDUSTRIAI • RE %1DENT1AI r ! a a Y f sr�� ,k � r } y; i F a , r rtr'f t d;cr i r pFy fS4 - YlV ( r 4 JA�x4 Aal `a t a3k �y FMY� ♦ ' kL} P�rYa�.4 't T r Y9 r 4 i a � y�eY - E X , 5 ,3 t} IMM I—IN, 3k�7,z5!4 ts� y ryr r?:t r T P'1 c Y d M 4 rY( ? i 11 X }` a fsL rpp4 i;Y Fmk 4 7- -77 rs F s' .P� .-.,N'�,,.r;�(;: JOHN D.W EBBER, W.D.,P.C. Physician Diseases of the Breast Therapy of Breast Cancer March 7 , 1988 ° 19gS Keith S. Liden ;pkR Senior Planner Planning Commission SIVej pEp�� City of Tigard t2 ��s� 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: City CodeRequirements 11632 S.W. Barbur Blvd. Dear Mr.-Liden: This letter is written in follow-up of our telephoneconversation of March 7, 1988, during which we discussed the recent City Code Require ments ,outlined in your letter of February 17, 1988, to Eastgate Theater Inc The, purpose of this letter is to bring to the attention of staff and the Planning Commission the historical development of our property, currently utilized fora private educational' facility for dance and gynmastic instruction. This facility has been providing a wholesome and positive influence on the community since its erection in _1974. Its function is similar to that of any small grade school with an attendance of over 1000 students and a staff of between 25 and 40 persons. Paramount in its past development was the safety of its patrons, which included usually young students and their mothers. _ Identity on Pacific Hwy. was a high priority which was assured by City of Tigard staff when an off-street location was selected for purposes of safety. Our small sign is currently erected according to the Sign Code Appeal SCA 2-74 of May 29, 1974. This sign is situated at a site specified by City of Tigard engineers on a 30 foot easement from our. property to Pacific Hwy. Its erection complied with the newly designed sign ordinances which were being evaluated in 1974, later being accepted in 1978. Your recent letter indicating non-conformance of our sign is disturbing, as our previous attempts to work closely with the City have been successful. We hold that our sign is in conformance with the guidelines outlined to us by the staff of the City of Tigard and its Planning Commission, and that to remove our sign from its present location would provide undue hardship on our off-street location. I appreciate your willingness to review this matter and to pursue it with the Planning Commission for consideration. Y u sinrerel , Jo D. Webber, 6 .Borland Rd., Suite C-3/Tualatin Oregon 6 97062-9749/(50 3)(,)221111 Fellow,American College of Surgeons/Diplomate,American Board of Surgery JDW:J d American Society of Clinical Oncology „ CITY F TIGARD P. O. Box 23557 92420 S. W.Again Tigard,Oregon 97223' May :29, 1974 L Dr. John Webber ;Jobber DanceStudio 11632 S.U.` Pacific Highway Tigard, Cregon 97223 Re: - Sign Code Appeal SCR 2-74 Dear Or. Webber: This is to inform you that the above request has been approved by the Tigard Planning Commission subject to the condition that said sign meet the minimum vision clearance standards of the Tigard Zoning Ordinance as described by Ordinance Section 18.12.100 (b). If you should have any questions regarding the above action, please. do not hesitate to call our office at 639-4171. Sincerely, Uinslow C. Brooks Planning Director WCB/fs IVA TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 0 i REGULAR MEETING — MARCH 8, 1988 i: President Moen called-the meeting to order, at 1:40 p.m. . The meetingwas held at the Tigard Civic, Centur -- TOWN HALL- ROOM, 13125' SW Hall Blvd. , � Tigard, Oregon. ' R i 2. ROLL GALL: Presents President Moen, Commissioners .Rusbor•ough, Peterson, Barber, Castile, and Owens (arrived 8;07) . 1€ Absent, Commissioners Frye, Leverett, and Newton. Staff: Keith Liden, Senior Planner; Diane Jelderks, Planning Commission Secretary. t 3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Rosbor•ough moved and Commissioner' Castile seconded to approve minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION b Ther was no Planning' Commission Communication.. 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 88-01, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 88-01 SEAPORT ASSOCIATES NPO 45 Request to change the zoning, from IL (light industrial) to I—P (industrial park) on 0,92 acre currently -developed site. Also, to approve an already recorded lot line adjustment between the subject parcel (WCTM 2S1 1BC, Lot 201) and adjacent parcels (WCTM 2S1 IBC, Lot 200). The lot line adjustment results in a roughly equivalent exchange between the parcels of areas of approximately 3,950 square feet each. Senior Planner, Keith Liden, reviewed the proposed change and made staff's recommendation for approval with one condition. President Moen stated that he worked for, a company that is a competitor, of the Irvington Moore Company, but did riot feel it would create a conflict in this proceedings. APPLICANTS PRESENTATION Joe Kaufman, Box 660, Wilsonville, Oregon representing Seaport, stated that Seaport currently has a buyer for this property who would like to use the site as their head office, however, this is not permitted under- the current- zoning, He requested that the Planning Commission grant approval for this zone change to enable the building to be marketed as it ' was 'constructed for. He apologized for the lot line adjustment being processed inappropriately. This was done because the firm is located in another State and was riot familar with the correct procedures. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3/8/80 PAGE I PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mr, William C. Ludders, 2.190 SW Crest Drive, Lake Oswego, 97045 (Owner of rental pruper,ty near S(>apur•t property), had questions 're,3ardi.ng ta•io hours of operation and the exchange of the land between the two property owners. Mr. Kaufman responded to Mr. Ludders concerns. Discussion followed regarding the landscaped buffering and 'what approvals would be required for occupancy. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Consensus of the Commission was for approval. CommissionerBarber moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve Zone 'Charge ZC 88-01 and Lot Line Adjustment "8-01 based on staff's recommendations and conditions. Also, ;for "staff to prepare the final order- wW for President Moen to sign off on that final order. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-07 SIGNS Senior Planner Liden explained that Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart had prepared the proposed amendments and would be available for questions later. He reviewed the changes which had been made from, the previous draft. He explained that the first sign' conformance letters had been mailed to bring signs into conformance by March 20, 1988. Because of- this, letters had been submitted by Doctor John Weber and William Frahler regarding specific sites. Also, individuals are present in the audience who would like to'give-public input as a resultofthe -letters that were mailed; PUBLIC TESTIMONY William Frahler, Frahler Electric, 10730 SW 85th Avenue, Tigard, 97223, summarized his letter which had be distributed to the Commission. He requesting that an amendment be included in the ordinance which would allow signs to be grandfathered. lie explained that his roof sign mets the Code requirements in all other ways except that its located on his roof. He added that the sign had been in existence for 29 years and was basically used to help delivery people find their location. He felt converting the sign over to a pole sign would be less attractive. Discussion followed regarding the process and how this hearing deals with the entire City in general and not with individual cases. Roger Anderson, Attorney, 10120 SW Kable, Tigard, Oregon representing Hobart Vermilye, Health Habit, stated that his problems were similar- to -Mr. Frahler regarding roof signs. He reviewed the history of the Health Habit site and distributed pictures of various roof top and billboard signs. He noted that billboard signs have no value except; to sell particular products. He submitted languane changes and suggested that Section 18.114.110 could be modified to include a portion of Greenbury Road which would include Mr, Fr•ahler•'s site. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES "3/8/88 PAGE 2 Ger-ald Kolve, owner of Canterbury Shopping Center, explained that he had ns and ten approximately twenty t CIF sl enants, ten of whom had conforming g who did not. He r';aquested that the Planning Conunissiun consider some fl��xibiliLy within Lhc cede where of sign,n, whatsense `ui lciakrwallcicl;iyn, whd to at - .• .: .: definitions of . what is a r 9 - added iti - He strict dcf in square feet it should be, etc. height it should be, how many q that the shopping center was constructed below grade and if the sign are lowered they would be located ,below grade and almost impossibl skt`d' that He reviewed difficulties that specific tenants were having and be addressed as to whether 'e theyr sign located on manser•d roofs considered roof signs or wall signs. tions Jerry Fuller•, 11440 SW Pacific Highway, owner of ha number r "likes to a have in the area, had several concerns. One, freeway-oriented section amended from height height of 35 feet: to 50 fits. 1'wu, he would_ like to amend the total area, from 120 square feet to 1.50 square feel. He suggested that the freeway-oriented signs have an ns ider(id distance of 1,000' fcerthato In tirereasedwhei:ghtay ucoublcd beuapproved freeway--oriented. . He suggested t:hruught theSign Code Exception process. Phil McCurdy, representing Chevron U.S.A. was present to discuss the , vice stations. He added that he given staff a copy special needsof ser stations. His concerns were of the ORS which governs signage; for service that the sign code should be amended to incorporate ,the use of two free-standing signs when totUe. sign Hearea also o�expressedcr his or it concern for improve the `aesthetic Val ations to have theirfreeway-oriented signs and the need for service st signs oriented toward the freeways. RECESS 8:40 P.M. RECONVENE 8:55 P.M. Commissioner Peterson left 8:45 P.M. i rig hi s Discussion followed with hp•ic htMiller his rexisLing sign, visibiil ty of on in relationship to the freeway, ent directions, and when the sign was erected. the sign from differ Larry Bissett, 2004 NW Irving, raised concerns for more flexibility in the Code to allow certain design criterias for building sites that would be more appropriate to the site then what is already permitted by Code. He suggested that e section 18.114.130 (g) be modified so that more than He free-standing sign can be permitted, provided the height of such sign do,, not exceed (example, 8 feet) and the area of all signs shall riot; exceed (example, 70 percent) of the total area of all sign;; that would be permitted by Code. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3/8/08 PAGE 3 Assistant Planner•. Deborah Stuart. summarized chanyes that he+d boc:n 1114de since draft four. Ln response to Mr. Anderson's proposal for amortization of roof signs as they are proposing for billboards, she wanted the Commission to knew that st<Aff is taking a 'sir•icter view and that they are riot in support ,of pormi l tin,;l any type of r•uufsigns. She added she would be r•ewr•itirig Section 18.114.130(9)(5) which should address Mr. Bissett's concerns.' Discussion -followed regarding the Sign Code -Exception that had been approved by City Council for MicroAye, the sire of freeway—oriented signs, if any signs will come into conformance with the changes being proposed, the maximuin height versus combined height when two free—standing signs ar-e allowed, corner lot requirements versus interior- lot 'r•equir•ements, tieing number ,of signs permitted with number of accesses, using monument signs as much as possible, allowing two free--standing signs for- all lots, what- total square footage should be allowed, what signs should be allowed as permitted uses and what, signs should be require an exceptions. Consensus of the Commission was that two free-standing signs should be permitted on corner lots and inter-ior lots would require Sign Code Exceptions. The Commission requested staff to investigate the use of monument- signs, by other jurisdictions. Discussion followed on the billboard signs- amortization. The Planning Commission requested that staff investigate a shorter- amortization period for billboards. Discussion followed regarding fr�eeway--oriented businesses, what distance should be permitted, what- distanceshouldrequire Sign Code Exceptions, and what kinds of criteria you should use. The Commission requested that staff explore what signs ar•e per on state highway/freeway signs and to supply definitions for- painted signs. l-engthy discussion followed regarding prohibiting or permitting roof signs. Consensus of the Commission was that administrative decision process should be made available for existing roof signs. Also that special consideration should be given to Main Street and Canterbury Square because of the topography. President Moen requested the public give their- rebuttal now before he closes the public hearing. Roger Anderson suggested that the Planning Commission review existing roof signs using the existing Sign Code Exception criteria. Also, that the roof sign should be given the same amor-tization as billboards. Mr. Frahler drew a picture depicting the location of his roof signs stating that it is a neat, clean, well- taken care of sign, and it.s been there for 29 years and he would like to keep it. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3/8/88 PAGE 4 I._ar•ry BissoLL felt that hi.s proposal could be r0vised Lia allow flexibility and ilncour•age the use of monument signs when ther•o is more . . than one tenant, but the site does riot qualify as a shopping center. Ile suggested mod ifyirig his proposal to read that whin more than one free--standing "moriumont" sign riot to exceed six feet and ni;+yhe change the por•centage nit to exceed "sixty percent" of what would be per•miLt:ed undor that zone. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Further discussion fol.lowod regarding roof signs, possible alternatives to either 'eliminating roof signstotally, allowing an administr,at:ive exception for• existing 'signs,, and ;specifying specific areas to have special-considerations such as MainStreet and_Canterbury Square. Senior planner- L.i.don explained that the 'downtown (CBD area) is beirig reviewed by the City Center'` Task Fonce and that they were in the process of putting together' a plan, consequently no enforcement is being done on - downtown signs only compliance agreements being signed to require them to bring thein into conformance when the downtown plan is complete. Further discussion on roof signs and what would be the ,appr•opr•iate language to use. The :Commission requested that staff provide language that would eliminate roof signs but would allow signs on-manser•d roofs with possibly a 600 angle. The Commission requested that staff come -up with definitions for sign area that would riot include the manserd roof area but would allow the sign to be considered a wall sign, The sign could be mounted above the gutter but riot to oxceed the roof line. Discussion followed regarding how to continue, what issues needed to be covered and what issues had already been resolved. Further discussion on the use of balloons, how often, consensus was to allow once a year- and not to limit it to new businesses but for everyone. The Commission requested staff explore the use of monument signs and how their use might- be encouraged. X Commissioner, Moen moved and Commissioner, Castile seconded to table the Zone Ordinance Amendment LOA 87--07 to March 15th to deal strictly with the Sign Code. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o There was no other, business. 7. MEETING ADJOURNED 11:45 PM Diane M. Jeldor•ks, Planning Coimnissions Secr•el:ar•y A I'1'IcST A. Donald Moen, President dj/3785U PLANNING C"ISSION MINUTES 3/0/88 PAGE 5 AGENDA ITEM 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 8, 1988 TO: TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 3, 1988 FROM:. DEBORAH STUART, ASSISTANT PLANNER_ RE: ZOA 87-07 " i i ATTACHED IS DRAFT 5 OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SECTION I 4 18.114 (SIGNS) OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE. j i r.w l k 1 t 1 4 ` w { P, A°F ar :stt„� s r 2f � r t` t' M MMP } .r {I � �• `M -��t m 7M1.�6hte !�ti4y!`9 { s c r Cal t' fi :Rk ss w i E yp Y r„'iW, 71 i r • y r t �4 ,.� t uc vis�. ur r3 y f 4 lr y? s ,.pl a f skit#t f tts Yr t: a 1 k Y ,4.' wyP y y Y r :s sryc'*t y hx +tif Mzr41 •= y t t 'r, flt rf5' 3`:9 4 5 1 1i 1 2 k s € t!{f� ifs F Y Mr �y+r#s '� dy �' i 3` fi tsrx.ktl ` y Y LF l`IA t 1 vs tt i t "F1F. SM, S r - i* 'Y,,i r€* db r t«? r rt; � '.y lc � 'A�3{� t ti , r'h � +• t. 3 �" r sti t 1 4 r�Y r; rAUltjn Sit pi- t s:fy `t w� ri gc,}F T�A s d F4 Y�` x 7• +"(aro rro Yx 1 r 7x 1} r +. yr (. l � ^9, , Pw c a lbs;.Gr ri. w 1sst`6ri{ ariar 4p .fczr{ :X' nt wr'S. t {f f. } t ; fz wtF, �u r c'x r Po�j r� a 5: f �Y sa k 6 a Ar _Q rt•y4Y x : �� r+r. r '�,�� 'r aC. ���� ^' �`,t►'�rt �.an *.t`td •m t#-tab f�;: s'•-'7$r cz £ ,'' i t "Rr F2. 5.-.i+. }.. +t,,,. t t f >t.•• a 5r 4 „f x/s r k51va�` r Wt P�` i-s3�rx,,'�7 aa' 'uhc. .r+. ,sy"v:tir'� b 1.Y?71 5- u3•{rl+•4 kt r t` �5 3m �'r1f; r+"r'�i'fF�'.s�mx;:t_ C �t s A�li f�lly4 e "-ir `4 �Yr� e ,C S � r {2,,,711 S�:��-"��: .✓n'�!� t.f.r7�"� c T r!, `fir fY J � t j t $ 2. i V Y x �+� 1lr a�•rr y�3% S._�� A i-F^r y _.�sl �G� I �,, r- .kd �� ?.7k � 4. —F' �5���,fir4 i �' ��kxsw K��..rT.,=r a ���1 �,� r �,�5..�'� `-•.err +� '���'A' i '<�,rxi P �,."i �j�> S iiC �• � } t 'y Y6r �} s _,rr Fx ,� c x r' P4frX 1` i Cr'trrYy; 51. t s t, +`� ,', ft t '"�, e 7 Y yr r ev'•`'arl,�r ifi of€rrE S Sg C(i Y 5 "a .f�.7'4 xt k > ,~s✓tt`4t t 1 i r $yt".''' 1s yt }tA a�„,rt�ri rr ,-1?s'�# S'7-y �S ,�, Jt }i `s.-15, .if. 2 e 4xx •y t i- �*� r k e:4 r 1� .{t ti^'a'`�a!4 1 ;r „r f� FY .R.. e! 't'",� 4 v' r r •z4 �,'”`-�-�a!F sfi i•'"+t"fri sf- l L""v § u`.L T" r v vyrS•'rtii47y�,pz bvtr` r_rt�s ��S) ,,r G �;#'v+.4,{tyf-=fqr f +r� 3t-r?. .. .. v Sr5i5 7'f 7 s1v r W w ,,= t 1r"rky ltd f y:tl t:'�X s• f3 tZ : €q s r'i :-x't 1 5< � c t. �<.: r�,.4 N :"- ^x :�. �v t'�{ r r}�r. '<� zZ• _f o-.�'Yt fl ,i• ii'r r •t � E '.x d s vt, _ r�ry$.�y .'',-r #•�'' +.iy pp,, ?.x r r -- {{ S� r i k.r t t,r 3, a crit -��,,a, �, t t 4 t r- x i t All Yf � ��kiYa1+"i �.�tlR t [�,^{ '�S`�ri�r'`q_ _,mak `�ff Ff �£Y1�,4+� Ver(, 4 �k�-��F Z•5�1� :�aC^rtNh Y/�y °�{r�4�'.��A+Pl 4.,�yiF#*i T'a Yom'-.$t!"�ts�kr�{-..y� r �4:. xs•tT: #``k,veyp'"c,' ; .� {i ted.S 3, -^' +tet , 'rs2' '�/��.:^`r y"' i`i �� f r rer""..; a £3 p•.�'�5'i�T�t C 5 i cC�G» 7 3 r r t c t d...p, x {:.F��w. _._.:''�"fikYt r# -} t:: t.'£. i�'y,� ,.. y, ,..y 7r{. •3 .i.,, ::� ...e. •;�=,.r--".s.ns�„'r i-�.�.-....- ...,..-<3�,r. -_. f'-- g �� ,..,3�rs P'h � -�`a�• �-s[i a s,.l�n,� i ? +,Ts €'r3-'s'{s' <� Q1,5 �r its �,?�:pS-r,{ �sr lEr7 ��ar r`'i t'�)i''a;,.rfi�` S� s +`YF+tt. ,kk ''$ti -_ ,� k z•- a�,e- _ �' xs -.kY a C n! �- - / •t 1 r', Sirr r>s s'?1`6 �;.c 3rF r , � }£a �i �����n� � kf c� S� �'�""•k�r t/#' a✓`� r a�� a:3- ?r2 a r� f��ri = t.�� ` f tT- e e,sy zfa Gkz F{Y 1.t-(�}t"' ���'=3'rt a� sli s+•:. 1l M� s Y" k. A,:'`vr€ r€ •�t� 9 `a D r�� :.�"t. .,ar,v,...t ,..�.:�' .�`a�.r� ;�3•y }wa">;y,;; ��air.$< ,..('f._�,� �.. ���.,�p'�;_ � 4; c_ r , � •. , _� r ter, r i � p r: +`+�. T •{ISS.;S f 1 .�1j� r�;S K1 -'- 4� 1�'.� i"�`^ '��2 � ti.t n j �¢7� Y f`J� .yr t r 1y c J ,i. ': +$'P� i;!��t} �' •It'y�ri�'' 'r ix' aYzs r I# �� a t•� Y i'k,:YT�3�.:t p -. .14�rxi #,Eff �Y , Y- t Ors{ t -.r ! +1-t-+ts. s x; tyt F a, f i�c'' � F,,xr•r--s•�`f r y s tr}5 +t to F�s`�� _ ,=t-` 'w• sdW�a x? �'.. t 't ait i�> it+ i`i'r d},�. r, : i xT Sa,as-k r s. y? �i„�r try_A,fits` rr �. tl i } k r� Ta � ! P r � - �`� a• N� � - 'i'',.i�� t`rh ,�t>c�t�rss't't��tt c�"rn a 1¢ y--�5S�y�`c r i� ���MS �K :;C r .'-.,-, r t€r rk Y +�'r' � r s✓ yKat..5ira2i�' {{�•Y i:.-}Xyrr %M"r +e e� +52. {`t r..t i �•a*a r .# ct*`c.}r. Y'wI art fa t wsY r`*rr �^+x.r U>i- r5r `'� f xa, r ft< Lr. '�r• C jsxv f a r L n• $Z i fir. ` •- �;fy r� Fr`'��i�Sr�{i� � ��c'��Ti d :,+�.��lmil:'T el�yi}+�.1�K'��TS•^1 SrFu�xP*;r�} °J,i isY t- d t-. t v.r;,`sr=.: S•^j y- t :' .et h air q i �: ,rr #1' -,5- t2. 'cab +t c r �+,t - ntti`.,.: x s7,,`` Y ,f''r £f..:^ y f} ,s i r.uy�+ �, �' g• �.r«iv``'1�`•ki L :ar £� Y { t{''+••a �- r�t - fs� r+ +p r t� t m--- yr t-`z i d : st y{a t�G x { - r�„ tr S r -{ 'O St it s '` ii a a+7 n f 7 , k �.. Y clti �i F 1s r•.l: 7 r r��S� � tY r4 t t5s.nt3 F'.�..S yY�'i�i :..t{ '#�S�' �'+-,c t � Y r n r , Nil r ,4 &t r � :b r t-.- , ,>�,,;'t;r..r �..,r,.::w:., r;,{,y?# Grp A"fnx �l f lr P r�� ��i� �r9 Ib J �'r�I�y,Tt-L s t�i '•r r l.. i r t t °,, des.: 5 S '`- y r "r ?tii > tti`. baa@-. � rr .,Yr#� -"y � f '9 c -ride tlaKj f/x•rw �i }3 iLs{-�kr7'+c # r 1. }i i.. f T ._ / t r 1, rr x,� it r�t:»,�> ��-, *"a 4 5�s>•a.r 51 t a< to_f!� p t � � trvsm 'l� 1 f, �r ;+`x+<t r k*�Gtr('r'sf. r 7 'c r'� c - + +'`k � j Y tr S ,'t+i�' -:. TABLE 18.114.130(a) PERMANENT SIGNS - R-1 through R-7 ZONES Number of Max'. Sign Max. Sign Signs Face Are Height Wall signs Unspecified 4 sq ft combined N/A Housing 1 per entry 32 sq ft Unspecified Complex I.D. Point Signs Subdivision-l.D. 1 per entry 32 sq ft Unspecified Signs point Nonresidential One 32 sq ft 6 ft. Signs— Condl Uses Additional Signs Allowed: Special Condition See Section 18.114.090 Signs Directional One per 4 sq ft/face Unspecified driveway F Temp. rigid signs 32 sq ft/face Unspecified Lawn signs b sq ft/face Unspecified - - — — — — — — — — — Extensions into R.O.W. : Not allowed Lighting: Indirect Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Centers: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed WM Table 18.114.130 (a) Page 1 j , d TABLE 18.114.130(b) PERMANENT SIGNS - R-12 through R-40 ZONES Number of Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs _Face Area Height Wall signs Unspecified 1 sq ft: 1 sq ft N/A of dwelling unit Housing 1 per entry 32 sq ft/face Unspecified Complex point Signs Subdivision 1 per entry 32 sq ft/face Unspecified Signs Point Nonresidential 1 per site, 32 sq ft/face 6 feet Signs-Condl uses 2 if more than-1 street frontage Additional Signs ,Allowed: Special Condition See Section 18.114.090 Signs Directional One per 4 sq'ft/face Unspecified driveway Temp. rigid signs 32 sq ft/face Unspecified Lawn signs 6 sq ft/face Unspecified — Extensions—into R.O.W. Not allowed Lighting: Indirect Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Centers: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed TABLE 18.114.130(b) Page 2 TABLE 18.114.130(c) PERMANENT SIGNS - C-G and CBD ZONES ms's_ Type of Number•,of Signs Max, Sign Max. Sign Signs Permitted Face Area Height Single business 1 freestanding :Freestanding 70-90 sq ft per 20-22 feet on one premise 1 wall sign/ facedependingdepending on face on setback setback Wall 15%of wall face N/A Projecting sign is mounted on Awning Painted wall 15% of wall face 20% of wall height Center with 1-7 One Freestanding 70-90 ft per 20-22 feet - tenants, less See area face depending depending on than 4 acres on setback setback Projecting 15% of each N/A Wall tenants wall face Awning Painted wall 15% of wall 20% of wall face Height Shopping Center One Freestanding 70-90 sq ft per 20-22 feet or Industrial Parks face depending depending on 8 or more tenants on setback setback Min. 4 acres Wall 15% of wall face N/A Awning Projecting Painted wall Electronic Message One in lieu Freestanding 70-90 sq ft 20-22 feet Centers of freestanding per face depending on or one wall depending on setback sign per premise setback Site Development 2 Freestanding Freestanding Up to an extra 20-22 feet Review 50% of sign of depending on area setback Fascia Wall Page 3 TABLE 18.114.130(c) TABLE 18.114.130(c) PERMANENT SIGNS — C-G and CBD ZONES (continued) Number of Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs Face Area Height Additional,Signs Allowed: Special Condition Signs See Section 18.114.090 Temp. rigid signs up to 4- 32 sq ft/face Unspecified Lawn signs See Code 6 sq ft/face Unspecified Directional One per 4 sq ft/face Unspecified driveway Extensions into R.O.W. : Not allowed Lighting: Indirect, Direct, Internal Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed Electronic Message Center: Allowed only with minimum message interval of greater than two seconds TAB►_E 18.114.130(c) Page 4 TABLE 18.114.130(e) PERMANENT SIGNS - C-N ZONE Max. Sign Number of Max. Sign Height Sir qns_ Face Area 32 sq ft/face 20-22 feet Single business 64 sq ft/total on one premise up to a max 50/face or 100 total Freestanding Sign One per premises ; 10% of 10% of wall N/A Wall wall face face One per 48 sq ft/face OR 30-32 feet Site Development 95 sq ft/total .- Review premises (applies to all of above) Additional Signs Allowed: . Special Condition See Section 18.114.090 Signs ; One per 4 sq ft/face Unspecified K; Directional driveway Up to 4 32 sq ft/face Unspecified Temp, rigid signs 32 'ft/face Unspecified Lawn signs See Codesq . Extensions into R.O.W. : Not AllowedIndirect, Direct, Internal Lighting: Not Allowed Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Center: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Allowed Temporary Signs: page 6 TABLE 18'.114.130(e) tit/2677D + EXHIBIT PROPOSED SIGN CODE CHANGES ko e'rYqh 1. 18.114.070 (h) Roof Signs-- [Roof signs of any kind are prohibited, including temporary, signs.) No roof signs, including temporary signs, are permitted with the ex- ception of approved temporary balloons. However, roof signs may be approved by the Commission through the exception procedure established by Section 18.114.140 of this Chapter. r 2. 18.114.110 (h) Roof Signs -- Signs in existence on the effective date of this Chapter which do not comply with the provisions of this Chapter shall be permitted to remain along Main Street and U.S. Highwa 99W only between S.W. Greenburg Road and S.W. Johnson Street until March 31, 1998, at which time such signs shall be brought into conformity. Commissioner Moen arrived RECESS 9:50 PM RECONVENE 10:05 PM 5.4 SUBDIVISION S 88-01 VARIANCE V 88-05 THURSTONSON/WAVERLY CONST. NPO # 5 Request to subdivide a 4.7 'acre parcel into 29 lots, a variance to allow a -50 foot street corner rail instead of the required 100 foot radius, and to :allow adjustments of the side lot lines of the platted lots of a maximum of 4 feet. Senior Planner Liden` reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval with conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Bill McMonagle, Harris--McMonagle, 12555 SWHall Blvd, representing the owner and applicant, had no objections to staff's conditions. He explained that the lot line adjustments are the same as the ones allowed for Bond Park. ; PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC ,NEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding the required radius and why the variance would be acceptable. # Commissioner Peterson moved- and Commissioner Moen seconded to approve S 88-01, V 88-05, and M 88-03 based on staff's findings and recommendations. Also, for staff to prepare the final "order and for Vice Chairman Fyre to sign off of the final order.'" Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.5 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-07 CHAPTER 18.114 SIGNS Request by the City of Tigard to review proposed amendments to Section 18.114 (Signs) of the Community Development Code. Senior Planner Liden introduced Assistant Planner Stuart to review the proposed amendments. Assistant Planner Stuart reviewed her memo regarding proposed changes. o Discussion followed regarding different terminologies, the use of balloons being limited to grand openings, the different size signs being proposed for different zones, the use of monument signs, and what could be allowed forgasstations. o Commissioner- Moen felt that prohibiting the use of obscenities should remain in the Code and suggested checking with the Attorney to see if this would be permitted. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1900 Page 5 PUBLIC,TESTIMONY o Larry Bissett, 2004 NW Irving stated that he had reviewed the proposed were a ropriate.- He felt that the amount of the pp amendments s and felt y signage that the Code allowed for wall size was shocking. He was in the Code which would allow existing concerned if provisions were made non—conforming signs to be granted exceptions under special circumstances. Discussion followed. o Randy Mawhirter, Luminite Sign Company, had read through the proposed amendments and felt it was good compared to other jurisdictions. He felt there should be a special zone for Main Street because of its unique situation. Also, there is nothing in the Code addressing lighted awnings or standards for neon displays. He felt monument signs were appropriate' in IndustrialParkentrances, however,- in locations like Main Street, this type of sign visibility would be blocked by vehicles. o Bob Byzick, Oregon Sign Company wanted the Commission to know that signage is very expensive. He` agreed' with Mr. Mawhirter that illuminated awnings neededtobe addressed. He questioned if allowing a high percentage for wall signs and restricting the size and number of freestanding sign is what effect,the City really wants. He felt this would cause an increased use of large illuminated cabinets as wall sign which may be less attractive'than two or three smaller freestanding signs. lie questioned the size allowed for electronic signs,' stating that they could not be constructed within the size allowed by Code; noting that the Park 217 and Landmark Ford electronic signs were larger than permitted by Code. o Discussion followed on how to proceed Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Fyre seconded to set ZOA' 87-07' over to the -March 8th ' Planning Commission hearing. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o Commissioner Owens questioned if the HOP section of the Code could be brought up for review again. Discussion followed. Consensus was that the Commissioners needed to contact the City Council directly to see if they would be willing to address their concerns regarding the Home Occupation Section of the Code. 7. ADJOURNMENT: 11:30 PM ' Diane M. Jelderi(s, Secretary ATTEST: MILT FYRE, Second Vice President 0-9 dj/3385D PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 23, 1908 — Page 6 AGENDA ITEM 5.5 PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 1988 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: The Planning Commission February 18, 1988 FROM: Deborah Stuart, Assistant Planne SUBJECT: ZOA 87-07 SIGN CODE REVISIONS - Draft 4 Attached are the latest revisions to -Chapter 18.114 of the Community Development Code which discusses signs. The changes include: 1. Insertion of new dimensional criteria for freestanding and wall signs in the C-N and C-P zoning districts; 2. ` Removal or alteration of provisions which could be interpreted as regulatingsign content. 'Staff consulted with the City Attorney at some length. Section 18.114.130 still needs improvement_ with respect to content issues; 3. A distinction is now made between temporary signs and (temporary) lawn signs. The latter replace provisions for political, idealogical, religious, etc, signs which inappropriately regulated sign content. Lawn signs will be exempt from permit requirements; 4. Section 18.114.070(l) provides new regulations for signs on vehicles; 5. Section 18.114.085 now spells out how staff will measure signs; 6. Section 18.114.090 allows a business or businesses to display one balloon and one banner upon the initial openi..ng 'of=that business as per Council direction. A sign permit will be required for both; 7. Dimensions for temporary signs have been increased to 30 square feet- for wall banners and 64 square feet for A-frame signs. Improvements for consistency to this section are still needed; 8. New regulations have been inserted for electronic message centers in Section 18.114.090(d). dj/3323D o Commissioner- Fyre moved and Commissioner. Rosborough seconded to approve 7_C 87-23 as proposed, .- Also, for staff to prepare the final order and for President.Meen to sign off on that final order. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners presenia. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-07 CHAPTER 18.114 SIGNS Request by the City of Tigard to review proposed amendments to Section 18.114 (Signs) of the Community Development Code. o Senior Planner Liden explained that the existing sign code had been patterned after the City of Portland and Multnomah County's sign 'codes.'. He reviewed difficulties that had arisen from court rulings which> prohibits regulating message on signs. Discussion followed regarding off premise signs and how to determine other than by message. On temporary :signs, a standard size needs to be established instead of basing sizeon the use or type of business using the temporary sign. He added that a copy of the proposed amendments had been sent to the organization which was formed by the sign industry to address their concerns. He continued reviewing sign standards by zone. In a R-1 to R-7 zone there are no maximum heights specified. Consensus of Commission was that ,a heightlimit should be specified. Suggested checking with other jurisdictions to determine how they handle. Zone R-12 through R-40. Consensus was the same, adding that there should be a maximum size face area for walls signs for multi—family dwellings. Discussion followed regarding sizes of signs for C-G and CBD zones. Mr. 'Liden suggested allowing public testimony at this point since the testimony concerned the C—G zone. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Larry Bissett, owner of property at the corner of SW Pacific Highway and Greenburg Road (Oregon Bank & Clinic), explained that the clinic was constructed in 1946 and the bank building in 1975, at which time they were required to go through an extensive review by the Design Review Committee as well as having to go through a Conditional Use approval for the drive-up window service. Presently they have 3 signs which were all approved during the design process. They would like to add an automatic teller machine and upon approaching the City for a sign permit were told that their existing signs are nonconforming. He requested that the Commission review the proposed amendments to the sign code, allowing for flexibility for such things as corner lots, two or more tenants in a location, or possible trade—off options such as two smaller signs in place of one larger sign. He suggested establishing some criteria that would allow an applicant to qualify to apply for additional signage. Fie volunteered to be on a committee to help establish such criteria. Planning Commission Minutes — January 19, 1988 Page 2 o Discussion -followed regarding looking at what other,;jurisdictions do to see how. they deal with similar situations. Also, how they might use monument signs rather than the standard 4 x 4 sign on a pole. Further discussion followed regarding what affect we are trying to achieve and the possibility of having a Citizens Sign Design Review Committeereview proposals ;prior to the Commission hearing them. Staff was asked to discuss the idea with the City Council at their workshop on January 25. Discussionfollowed regarding sire standards being 30 square feet only for the CP and; CN zones. Consensus was C-N should be the most- restrictive and CP less restrictive keeping the signs lower, similar to monument' signs. Discussion followed regarding Temporary signs`. The, different types, how' different sizes are currently allowed for different uses, what types are allowed, length of time allowed,, and ,enforcement. The direction being that we 'should be more restrictive than before. b. OTHER BUSINESS o` Solar Energy Ordinance Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposed ordinance explaining that it is divided into three parts: (1) New single family residential subdivisions; (2) In fill, or existing developments; and (3) Permit System,'' that would allow for protection against encroachment. Discussion followed. No action is necessary at this time. 7. ADJOURNMENT '10:15 PM '� a L� Diane M. Jelde Secretary ATTEST: A. Donald Moen, President ht/3011D Planning Commission Minutes -,January 19, 1988 Page 3 AGENDA ITEM 5.2 PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 19, 1877 ? MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON January 13, 1988 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: New Sign Standards (ZOA 87-07) Recent court cases have made it necessary to revise portions of our sign code, Chapter 18.114, so that our wording is consistent with these judicial rulings and thus legal. The essence of these recent court rulings in favor of free speech is that jurisdictions cannot regulate sign messages or sign content in sign codes. The amount, type and placement of signage can be regulated. The proposed sign regulations, therefore, aim to make our code 'content, neutral." There will be no mention of on- or off-premise signs, nameplates, ' identification signs, real estate signs, political or ideological signs or other types of signs based on their content. The task before the Planning Commission is to devise some uniform dimensional criteria which will ,apply to all temporary lawn signs (freestanding, temporary signs such as real estate, political, ideological signs, etc nThese stand standards must be uniform throughout the city. New dimensional dards for both freestanding and wall signs are also needed in the C-P and C-N zoning districts. Attached ar•e sign standards by zone that reflect existing Code requirements or staff recommendation where standards are presently- -lacking. Please review the attached table so we may discuss these standards on the 19th. ht/2677D a TABLE 18.114,130(x) PERMANENT SIGNS R-1 through R-7 ZONES Type of Number of Signs Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs Permitted - Face Area Height Walls signs Unspecified Mall 4 sq ft combined N/A Housing 1 per entry: Awning 32 sq ft Unspecified Complex I.D. point Painted wall- Signs Freestanding Subdivision I.D. 1 per entry Awning 32 sq ft Unspecified Signs point Painted wall Freestanding Nonresidential One Awning 32 sq ft 6 ft. Signs- Condl Uses Painted wall Freestanding Religious Assembly 1 per site Freestanding 65 sq ft 16 feet Uses with readerboard 1 per site Wall 5% of front wall face Directional One Freestanding 4 sq ft/face N/A Projecting Wall Extensions into R.O.W. : Not allowed Lighting: Indirect Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Centers: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not A114wed•:- Temporary Signs: Allowed Planning Commission 1/19/88 (ZOA 87-07) Page 1 t TABLE 18.114.130(a) PERMANENT SIGNS R-12 through R-40 ZONES z , Type of Sign Max. Sin Number of Signs Max. Si g g Signs Permitted Face Area Height Walls signs Unspecified wall 1 sq ft: 1 sq ft N/A of dwelling unit Housing 1 per entry Awning 32 sq ft Unspecified Complex I.D. point Painted wall Signs Freestanding- Subdivision I.D. 1 per entry Awning 32 sq ft Unspecified Signs point Painted wall Freestanding Nonresidential 1 per site, Awning 65 sq ft 6 feet Signs-Condi uses 2 if more Painted wall` than 1 street Freestanding frontage Religious Assembly 1 per site Freestanding 65 sq ft 16 feet uses with reader- board i wall 5% of front wall . t face Directional One Freestanding 4 sq ft per N/A Wall face Projecting Extensions into R.O.W.~ - Not allowed Lighting: Indirect Flashing Lights: Not Allowed= Electronic Message Centers: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed Planning Commission 1/19/88 (ZOA 87-07) Page 2 TABLE 16.114.130(c) PERMANENT SIGNS C-G and,CBD ZONES Type of Number of Signs Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs Permitted Face`Area Nei ht Single business 1 freestanding Freestanding 70-90 sq ft per 20-22 feet , on one premise 1 wall sign/ face depending depending on face on setback setback Wail 15% of wail faceN/A Projecting sign is mounted on Awning Painted walk 15% of wall face 20% of wall height Center with 1-7 One freestanding 70-90 ft per 20-22 feet, tenants, less See area face depending depending on than';4 acres on setback setback Projecting` 15% of each N/A wall tenants wall face Awning Painted wall 15% of wall 20% of wall face height Shopping Center One Freestanding 70-90 sq ft per 20-22 feet or Industrial Parks face depending depending on 8 or more tenants on setback setback Min. 4 acres Wall 15% of wall face N/A Awning Projecting Painted wall Directional One Freestanding 4 sq ft per N/A Wall face Projecting Electronic Message One in lieu Freestanding 70-90 sq ft 20-22 feet Centers of freestanding per- face depending on or one wall depending on setback sign per, premise setback Site Development 2 Freestanding Freestanding Up to an extra , 20-22 feet Review 50% of sign of depending on area setback Fascia Wall. Page 3 Planning Commission 1/19/66 (7.OA 67-07) TABLE 18.114.130(c) PERMANENT SIGNS - C-G and CBD ZONES (continued) Type of Number of Signs `, Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs Permitted Face Area Height Extensions into R.O.W. : Not allowed Lighting: Indirect, Direct, Internal Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed Electronic Message Center: Allowed only with minimum message interval of two second planning Commission' 1/14/08 (ZOA &7--07) Page 4 TABLE 18.114.130(4) PERMANENT SIGNS - C-P ZONE Type of Number of Signs Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs Permitted Face Area Height Single business on one premise Center with 1-7 ! tenants less than faces .Shopping Center or industrial parks 8 or more tenants Min. 4 acres Site Development Review (applies to all of above) Directional Signs Directional - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - Extensions into R.O.W. : Not Allowed Lighting: Indirect, Direct, Internal Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Center: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed Planning Commission 1/19/88 (ZOA 87-•07) Page 5 TABLE 18.114.130(e) PERMANENT SIGNS - C-N ZONE Type of Number of Signs Max. Sign Max. 'Sign Signs Permitted Face Area Height Single business on one premise Center with 1-7 tenants. Less than'4 acres Shopping Center 8 or more tenants Min. 4 acres Site Development Review (applies to all of above) Directional Signs Extensions into R.O.W.: Not Allowed Lighting:; Indirect Direct, Internal Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Center: Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed' { Page 6Planning Commission 1/19/88 (ZOA 87-.07) a ; TABLE 16.114.130(e) PERMANENT SIGNS - C-N ZONE i ' Type of Number of Signs Max. Sign Max. Sign Signs Permitted Face Area Height i Single business on one premise Center with 1-7 tenants. Less than 4 acres Shopping Center 8 or more tenants Min. 4 acres Site Development Review - (applies to all of 'r above) Directional One Freestanding '`4 sq ft per N/A Signs Wall face Projecting - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �. Extensions into R.O.W. : Not Allowed Lighting: Indirect, Direct, Internal Flashing Lights: Not Allowed Electronic Message Center: -Not Allowed Moving or Rotating Parts: Not Allowed Temporary Signs: Allowed ht/2677D Planning Commission 1/19/66 (ZOA 87-07) Page 7 Philip R (McCurdy, Architeet , 8040 N,E,Sandy Blvd. Portland,Oregon 97213 (503)282-5477 December 21, 1987 Mr. Keith Liden Community Development Dept. 13125_S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ref ZOA-87-07 revisions to the sign code, Job #87122 Dear Keith, On behalf of Chevron USA, Inc.,-I submit the following: 1. Oregon Revised Statutes, #646.930, outlining "Trade practices and Antitrust Regulation" for motor vehicle fuel pricing. 2. Oregon Administrative Rules, #OAR 137-20-150, outlining gasoline advertising requirements. 3. Questions and answers from the Department of Justice, Business/ Labor/Consumer Affairs Division, Financial -Fraud"Section. 4. _Excerpts from: "The Economic Values of On—Premise Signs" by National Electric Sign Association, Public Service Project. 5. Philip R. McCurdy, Architect's comments on the vital role of service station signage. Chevron USA requests this information be submitted to the Planning Commission, for the purpose of establishing a sign code exemption policy for gasoline service stations. The exemptions requested are: a) Allow two freestanding signs. b) One freestanding sign to be used for pricing and service information only, the other, a logo sign in accordance with the sign code. c) Freestanding pricing sign may be located in the front yard, readily visible and readable by a potential customer. d) Alternate: Pricing signage may be mounted on the. logo'sign. The allowable logo sign area will not be decreased from the price signage area placed on this pole. Respectfully, Philip R. McCurdy, Architect ». 1 L _ 9 i } u `f Y:. i+14Nr- 1 z 4y�F x z' S yrt t Ki - F:.M R Y : U v y,.tix4F�A - x �Y d; � F;�a-�.•.:.�.� Q �� rxp�- t rr i r t: ��t._ ::.r T t� �z'�b. Y yr �'' x Fa��,rt,!•z, S,4 kt m + y Szi a A Fa L f,SA �'r 3'ly. G rer i�Ff s uL s syk�"n ���. 9 � ,fJ ,Yi r � 1 '� ....:-. 1 ! 7r t �l;_,kl i t 't. .�Fa`ti' 1•��•�,,i�.�*»3 9 y,+. t r 1 +(S SK ��Y�1,F: z� 41 s I ! r 4 L . „f{ a [,..' -... ,IS �a '- ! ata f,.r E_} ls�{t 'zska 4..r h .Z. �� �, i ��"� s,lt }�,•7 } y ."��,.,.5 � t Y� b..V ea�,x�'fyz�s 4..`t � i a'.. z �". .,: .� .., .E(i., -Gs a...,::.: _.. .<.., .,rw.:,..vw. _,.:...s ..,:r.. :....,..,. 4..:.v/,a, ..it....:r. _ .!'s N��_.._ ,. �,tl•�:d��,FJ.�t....:,..�"�5rS 4f)..��. ::x�L.� � DAVE FROENMAYER WILLIAM F.GARY • DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEYGENERAI.'. .. ' f DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Justice Building Salem,Oregon 97310 Telephone:(5031378-4400 ( January 13, 1986 E Dear Gasoline Dealers: 3 As you may already know, the 1985 Oregon Legislature passed a new law concerning gasoline advertising in Oregon. (ORS Rulemaking authority and enforcement was placed,`in 646.930.) g Y the Departmentof Justice. Our Financial Fraud Section drafted rules to implement the law after meeting with representatives of the industry and holding public 'hearings. The rules were filed with, the Secretary of State on December 31,_ 1985. Both the law and rules took effect January 1, 1986. Dealers have 90 days or until March 31, 1986 to make the necessary advertising changes. We believe the new law and set of rules will help both the consumer and you as a gasoline_ dealer. Consumers will no longer be misled by confusing advertising, thus 'paying higher prices than necessary and dealers will not lose customers due to unethical competitors. In order to make the rule transition as smooth as possible, . my staff has compiled the attached information and will be distributing it throughout the state during meetings with interested gasoline dealers. In cooperation with the Oregon Gasoline Dealers Association, we have scheduled the following meetings: January 13, 1986 - Portland area January 16, 1986 - Bend area January 20, 1986 Grants Pass area January 22, 1986 - Salem area January 28, 1986 - Seaside and Eugene areas Other meetings in Coos Bay, Pendleton and Klamath Falls are being scheduled in February. The staff of the Oregon Gasoline Dealers Association has taken the responsibility of notifying dealers of the time and location of the meeting in their respec- tive areas. ( i -•Gasoline Dealers January 13, 1986 Page Two If you have any questions concerning the law or rules that were not answered during the meetings, please _do not hesitate to call Financial Fraud .at 378-4320 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. Enforcement assistants will make sure your questions are answered. yours very truly, DAVE FRORNMAYER Attorney General DF:cm Attachment I , ! i TRADE PRACTICES AND-AI�I'I'I'r UST REGULATION- 84fi 646.930 Motor vehicle fuel prices; (4) Violation of ORS 646.915 is punishable rexluirements for display. (1) A person who by a fine not to exceed$50. } operates a service station,business or other place (5)Violation of ORS 646.920 is punishable for the purpose of retailing and delivering gas- by a fine not to exceed$50. oline,diesel or other fuel into the tanks of motor (6)A person violating ORS 646.930 commits from the a Class C misdemeanor.(Amended try 1953 a 3s1 ;2: vehicles may display on a sign visible street the lowest cash prices charged for the sale o 1967 c.14d§2 1967 §a; .2 on(a)enacted as 1969 f all grades of gasoline,diesel or other fuel. c395 42 1971 87484 1§224 197755 cc_255 115; eubaectioa (3) (2) The following apply to a sign, displaying enacted as 1975 c.25S 116(1);1985 c251 128:subsection(3) t4 prices under this section: enacted u 19a5 c.46912(2):wbG*ction(4)enacted as 1985 (a) The price per unit of measurement and c.46a 13 (3): rabeeetion (5) anactod as 1985 c.46a 14 (2):' the unit of measurement for a particular kind of sybaection(6)enacted sa c-75111(4)] fuel must be the same on the sign as on any penalties. (1) Any person dispensing device used for delivering that kind of 648.6420�the terms of an injunction Biel into the tanks of motor vehicles. who wilfully (b) If a cash price displayed on a sign is issued under ORS 646.632 shall forfeit and pay to } the sign the state a civil Penalty to be set by the court of available only under some conditions, morethan r violation. For the and the dispensing device must clearly state the P°urposes o ;section, the court issuing the i conditions. injunction shall retain jurisdiction and the cause f (c) If a price displayed on a sign is available ti continued, and in such cases the pros- only in a certain area of the service station or ecuting attorney acting in the name of the state business,the area where the price displayed i8 may petition for recovery of civil penalties- available must be clearly identified. (2) Any person who wikfully violates any (3)A person who displays a cash Price that is provision of an assurance of'.voluntary tom- available only under some conditions may not Ply approved and filed with an appropriate require, as a condition of;buying fuel at the under ORS 646.632 shall forfeit and pay to displayed price,that the buyer fill the fuel tank of court the state a civil penalty to be set by the court of the buyer's vehicle.Tormsrbl 648.8751 not more than$25,000 per violation.Any pros- riate 646.935 Diesel fuel sales; prisms din- stating attorney may apply to an apPrOP crimination. (1)No person operating a service of such civil penalty. court for recovery station selling to the public at retail diesel fuel, where delivery is regularly made into s receptacle (3)In any suit brought under ORS 646.632,if on a vehicle from which receptacle the fuel is the court finds that a wilfully used a method, wilfullyrson is r usingpractor supplied to propel the vehicle,shall refuse to sell � unlawful by ORS 646.607 or 646.608,the and deliver any quantity of such fuel to any attorney,upon Petition to the court, vehicle during regular business hours, upon p on beef of the state,a civil penalty demand and tender of the posted price plus any to may of not exceeding$25,000 per i applicable tax for such fuel delivered,subject to a Violation. "tC.744 by the §17;1975 x437§5:1977 c 195 1101 rationing policy established by state or federal vollation.(1x71 8744 statute or regulation. (2)A price differential or method of delivery designed to discriminate agninst or discourage purchases by vehicles of small fuel capacity is prohibited. However, a reasonabledelivery hall differential based uponquantity s�) not be considered discriminatory.(Formerly PENALTIES 646.990 Penaties. (1) Each violation of any of the provisions of ORS 646.010 to 646.16() by any person, firm or corporation,whether as principal,agent,officer or director,is punishable, upon conviction,by a fine of not leas than$100 nor more than$500, or by imprisonment in the ( county jail not exceeding six months,or by both. (2)Violation of ORS 646.725 or 646.730 is a Class A misdemeanor. (3) Violation of ORS 646.910 is punishable by a fine not to exceed$50. 1 GASOLINE ADVERTISING 2 137•-20-150 3 (1) DEFINITIONS: For purposes of OAR 137-20-150 to 137-20-160 the following` definitions shall apply: (a) "Retailer" means any person who operates a service' a station, business or other place for the purpose of retailing and 7 delivering gasoline, diesel or other fuel into the; tanks of motor S vehicles. 9 (b) "Displayed" means visible from a street or highway 10 adjacent to the place of business. 11 (c) "Clear and conspicuous means in a;form that is 12 readily visible to and easily readable by a customer or potential 13 customer who wouldbe materially affected by the information and 14 means in a location that a person who would be materially 15 affected by the information ought to have noticed the information g displayed. a 17 (d) "Full service' includes services such as washing is windshields, windows and headlights, checking fluid levels, 19 checking or adjusting tire pressure and inspecting belts and 20 hoses but does not include a car wash. 21 (2) ADVERTISING: A retailer is not required to display 22 prices chargedfor gasoline, diesel or other fuel. 23 (3) DISPLAYED PRICES: Except as provided in section (4) of 24 this rule a retailer displaying a price for gasoline or diesel 25 4 shall: 28 (a) Display clearly and conspicuously on each sign 27 the lowest cash price for each grade of gasoline or diesel fuel 28 1 - GASOLINE ADVERTISING Department of Justice Business/Labor/Consumer Affairs Division Financial Fraud Section Salem,Oregon,97310 (503)375-4732 1 offered for sale. Each lowest cash price displayed shall be the 2 same size as.`All other prices displayed on the sign. 3 (b) Identify clearly and. conspicuously -for each price 4 the grade of gasoline or diesel ' fuel. 5 (c) Arrange all prices in a meaningful and consistent 0 order. 7 (d) State clearly and conspicuously on the dispensing 8 device and on the sign all conditions, applying, to the lowest cash g price. Conditions limiting the cash price on the display must 10 comply with the following criteria. 11 (A) All words or symbols -of limitations or con- 12 - dition must be presented in equal size and must be 13 equally visible to the consumer; 14 (B) All words or symbols of limitations or con 18 clition must"be no less than one-third- the size of the . 10 words or 'symbols- setting forth the cash price. 17 (a) Not display-1 prices"for.'products' other`.than:Basom 18 'dine or-`diesel':fuel-"•in a -manner creating-a likelihood of con 1g : fusion or-misunderstanding with "the`:price of gasoline or diesel 20 fuel 21 - - = (f) Not' charge a customer more than the amount 22 registered on the dispensing device or per unit than the unit 23 price calibrated on the dispensing device, unless the dispensing 24 device is for diesel"- fuel and at- least 85' percent of the fuel 25sold during the-preceeding 12 months by the retailer is diesel. • •28 (g) Calibrate `all 'dispensing- devices in the same -unit. 27 of measurement. E 28 2 GASOLINE ADVERTISING Department of Justice Rusinese/LaWr/Consumer Affairs Divisic Financial Fraud Section Salem,Oregon 97310 (503)378-4732 I (h) Display the price per unit of measurement and the 2 unit of measurement for each type of fuel in the same unit of measurement as shown on the dispensing device. In the 'event both cash and credit sales under a' disco'unt for cash program are 5 'made from the same dispensing device, a sign stating the cash a price, and identifying it as such, at least 2 inches in 7 height must be placed on the pump face in the immediate vici- a nity of the metered price so both may be observed by the con- 9 sumer at the same time. 10 (4) EXCEPTIONS 11 (a) A retailer who displays only the price of diesel 12 for vehicles with PUC permits and who sells during the preceeding 13 twelve (12) months at least 85 percent of its total fuel as . 14 diesel need not comply with OAR 137-20-150(3) (x) through (e) . 15 (b) A retailer who has a sign existing. as of January s 1, 1986, more than 20 feet in height as measured from ground 17 level to the bottom of the sign must: is (A) Display clearly and conspicuously on 'the sign 19 the lowest cash price for the two predominant grades of 20 fuel which the retailer sells to motor vehicles. For 21 purposes of this section, "predominant grades of fuel" 22 means the grades sold in the greatest volume during 23 the preceeding 90 days. 24 (B) Display clearly and conspicuously on a sign 25 visible from the street the lowest cash price for all 28 grades of gasoline or diesel sold, 27 (C) Comply with all other provisions of OAR 3 - GASOLINE ADVERTISING Department of Justice Business/Labor/Consumer Affairs Division Financial Fraud Section Salem,Oregon 97310 (3®3)`378-4732 1 137-20-150(3) 2 (5) LIMITATIONS: A retailer displaying prices for a ,par 3 ticular grade of gasoline or diesel shall: 4 (a) Not require as a condition of buying fuel at the 3 displayed price that the buyer fill the fuel tank of the buyer's 6 vehicle or purchase a specific quantity or dollar amount of 7 fuel. This section shall not apply to sales to truckers with PUC S permits.' 9 (b) State clearly and conspicuously in commonly 10 understood terms on each display and at each dispensing device 11 any limitations applying to `the price; 12 (A) For purposes orf this rule limitations include 13 but are limited to methods of payment, e•g•, credit or 14 cash; level of service, e.q., full service or mini- 15 serve. is (B) In the event each dispensing device on a 17 dispensing island is subject to the same limitations, is clear and conspicuous signs may be placed on the canopy 19 above the island that are visible from each side of the 2 island or at the entry points of the island stating the 21 limitation in lieu of a sign placed on each dispensing 22 device on the island. 23 (6) OTHER LOCATIONS: If a price displayed on a sign is r 24 available only in a certain area of the service station or busi- 25 ness, the area where the price displayed is available must be 26 clearly and conspicuously identified so customers may readily 27 determine the location of the displayed price. 28 4 - GASOLINE ADVERTISING Department of Justice Businew/Labor/Consumer Affairs DivisioE Financial Fraud Section Salem,Oregon 97310 (503)378-4732 1 OAR 137-20-160 2 (1) A retailer may not limit the price advertised far a 3 particular grade of gasoline or diesel to a consumer purchasing or receiving goods or services in addition to the gasoline or � 5 diesel fuel except for full services. For purposes of this sec- 6 tion consumer does not include truckers with PUG permits who purchase diesel fuel. 3 (2) The location at which any grade.. of gasoline or diesel 8 fuel is dispensed or at which any limitation is applicable shall 10 not be changed except for ;a bona fide reason and shall not be } 12 changed within 60 days of another change except for an emergency 12 or legal necessity. 720-150 and this rule is a violation 13 (3) Violation of ORS 13 14 of the Unlawful Trade Practices Act, ORS 646.608(l) (u)- 1b 17 is 20 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 GASOLINE ADVERTISING ` 12/3©/85TW#2/am Department of Justice $urine a/Labor/Consxsaer Affairs Division Financial Fraud Section Salem,Oroggn 97310 (503) 3,7 732 QUESTIONS Q. DO I HAVE TO ADVERTISE MY PRICES? A. No. There is nothing in the rule or statute which requires you to advertise. Q. IF I ADVERTISE, WHAT DOES THE LAW. REQUIRE? ' A. Any advertisement must state your lowest cash price for each grade of gasoline and diesel fuel sold. Q. BUT WHAT IF I ONLY SELL DIESEL FUEL TO APPROXIMATELY ONE PERCENT OF MY CUSTOMERS? A. You must still advertise the lowest cash price for all grades of gasoline' and diesel. If you have pumps that dispense regular, unleaded, super unleaded and diesel you must have on your sign the WL lowest cash price for,each grade of gasoline as well as diesel. Q. HOW DO I ADVERTISE MY PRICE FOR DIESEL IF I AM NOT A TRUCK STOP? A. The rules have not changed in this area. The diesel price you will be advertising depends on the type of customers you serve. If the majority of your custo- mers are consumers, " you will advertise the diesel price which includes state and federal taxes. Q. SOW CAN I DETERMINE WHETHER THE MAJORITY OF MY SALES ARE TO CONSUMERS? A. If_ 51 out of ever 100 sales of gasoline and/or diesel fuel is sold in deliveries of 25 gallons or less the station will be considered to primarily serve con- sumers. 2 Q. ARE,THERE ANY SPECIFIC SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SIGNS? - [; A. No. The law does not require signs to be any specific size aslong asthey are visible from the street and display the price clearly and conspicuously. ; Q WHAT ABOUT THE PRICE POSTED ON THE SIGNS AND ANY WORDS OF LIMITATIONS: MUST THEY } BE;OF ANY PARTICULAR SIZE? A. The rule requires that all advertised prices must be the same size. if there are conditions which apply to any price advertised, then the conditions must be presented in equal size to other con - presented be visible to the consumers, and be no less than one-third the size of words or symbols setting forth the r price. Q. CAN I ADVERTISE _IN GALLONS IF MY PUMPS g ARE CALIBRATED IN LITERS? A. Yes. But you must also advertise your liter price. This means that if your pumps are calibrated in liters you would have to have your lowest cash price ad- vertised in liters as well as gallons. Assuming your station has three grades F of gasoline you would have to advertise your price for regular, leaded and unleaded both in terms of gallons and liters. Your price would 'have to be the same size and your words of limitations would have to be the same size as all words of limitation and would have to be no less than one-third the size of the Price. �< Q. DO I HAVE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL ., ORDINANCES? A. Yes, to the extent the local ordinance complies with the statute. If your local ordinance is inconsistent with the statute, you would have to follow the statute. We have not found a local ordinance which would conflict with the law or the rule as currently drafted. r. a 3 Q. WHAT ABOUT MY EXISTING SIGNS? DO I HAVE P TO CHANGE THEM? A. You will have to change your existing signs if they do not comply with the current law. There is no grandfather provision. Q. ARE THERE ANY EXCEPTIONS? A. Yes, there are some exceptions. If you have the large signs',that are typically seen on the highway, the rule could make an exception. Q. WOULD MY EXISTING SIGNS QUALIFY AS A HIGHWAY SIGN? A. Maybe. Your sign does not have to be on ahighway-to qualify.- The sign simply has to be a minimum of 20 feet in the air as measured from the ground to the -bottom of the sign. Q. IF I HAVE A SIGN THAT QUALIFIES AS ONE OF THESE "HIGHWAY SIGNS" WHAT DO I NEED TO DO? A. You must advertise the lowest cash price for your two predominant grades of fuel that are sold to the traveling public. For example, if your primary 'products sold are unleaded and super unleaded, then you must advertise both the unleaded and super unleaded. You will also have to have another sign posted in the station which would display your lowest cash price for all grades of gasoline and diesel. If the sign already advertises more than two grades of fuel, it may continue to advertise the additional grades. Q. WHAT ABOUT PUMP TOPPERS? I HEARD THAT YOUR OFFICE WAS REQUIRING PUMP TOPPERS. A. The rule as currently drafted does not require pump toppers. There was a substantial amount of discussion regarding pump toppers. There were various reasons why pump toppers were eliminated at this time. The hope is that the dealers will clearly identify their pumps and that there will be no need for pump toppers in the future. a 4 , Q. CAN I CONDITION THE PRICE WHICH I INTEND TO CHARGE CUSTOMERS ON A FILL UP OR ON A PURCHASE OF A SPECIFIC QUANTITY OR DOLLAR AMOUNT OF FUEL? A. No. The law makes it clear that you cannot condition a price upon` a fill. The rule also makes it clear that you cannotgetaround the :law by charging a price based ,upon a purchase of a speci- fic quantity pecificquantity of fuel, for example 10 gallons, or a specific dollar amount, $10. Q. CAN I STILL ADVERTISE OTHER PRODUCTS, SAY FOR EXAMPLE CIGARETTES? A. Yes. The rule, however, prohibits you from advertising in such' a way that the consumers would be confused or misled by your advertising of other products. for example, you would be in violation of the rule if you created confusion and misunderstanding by placing your sign for a carton of cigarettes at $1.02 next to your sign for regular gasoline. Q. CAN I RUN A PROMOTION THAT WOULD ADVERTISE THE PRICE OF UNLEADED WITH THE PURCHASE OF A PACK OF SOFT DRINKS? A. No. The rule prohibits these type of tie-in arrangements. Other types of arrangements would be a car wash, purchase of cigarettes, milk, etc. Q. CAN I ADVERTISE A CASH PRICE AND CALIBRATE MY PUMP IN THE CREDIT PRICE? A. Yes. The rule specifically addresses this problem and allows you to advertise the lowest cash price, calibrate a pump in the credit price and provide for a cash discount. You must clearly iden- tify the cash discount for the consumer. b Q. WHAT SORT OF SIGNING MUST I USE ON THE DISPENSING DEVICES? f A. There are no special signs required. You must, however, identify, at your dispensing device any limitations applying to the price and the customer must be able to readily identify where they will obtain the lowest cash price. Lf your entire,dispensing island is used for a single level of service, for a example mini-serve, or a single method of payment, example, cash, then you may post-a clear and conspicuous ,sign on the canopy above the island which is visible from each side of the 'island or at the entry points of the island designating the level of service or the method of payment instead of a sign placed on the dispensing device. If you are offering- a discount for cash and the pump is calibrated for a-credit price, you must, according to the Department of Agriculture, have a price differential chart on or adjacent to each pump or island. Q. WHAT IF I AM A TRUCK STOP? DO I ,HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULE? A. In some cases, you will have to comply with the rule. If you advertise only your lowest cash price for diesel fuel , and you in fact are a truck stop you need not comply with most of the rule. The way you can determine whether you are a truck stop or not is the number of gallons of diesel fuel sold during the preceding 12 months. If more than 85 percent of the fuel sold at your station j during the preceding 12 months consisted of diesel fuel, then you are a truck stop within the meaning of the rule. Q. WHAT IF I AM A TRUCK STOP AND I WANT TO ADVERTISE THE PRICE OF REGULAR ALONG WITH THE PRICE OF DIESEL? ARE THERE ANY SPECIAL RULES FOR ME? A. As soon as you, decide to advertise any other prices, other than diesel for trucks with FUG, you must comply with all of the provisions of the law. j 6 Q. WHAT ABOUT THE FILL REQUIREMENT AS IT RELATES TO TRUCKERS? A. As stated above, there is a prohibition in the rule against fill up require- ments. If you are offering a fill; up requirement to truckers with PUC, the rule will not apply to,you. Q. CAN I RUN A PROMOTION THAT WOULD ADVERTISE THE -PRICE-OF UNLEADED WITH THE PURCHASE OF A`PACK OF SOFT DRINKS OR A CAR °,WASH? A. No. The rule prohibits this type of tie-in arrangement unless the promotion runs to truckers only. Othertypes of arrangements would be a car wash, purchase of cigarettes, milk, etc. Q. WHAT IF I VIOLATE THE RULE, WHAT PENALTIES DO I FACE? A. The law makes violation 'of ORS 646.930 a Class c Misdemeanor. The law provi- des -that a Class c Misdemeanor may result in 30 'days jail time and/or a $500 fine. The rule also makes it a violation of the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UPTA) . Under the UTPA, you may be subject to a civil complaint filed by individual con- sumers. The consumers may recover dama- ges, not less than $200, plus attorneys fees. In addition, the Oregon Department of Justice may proceed against you civilly. They may ask you to volun- tarily comply or in the event of a wilful violation, could ask the court to impose a civil penalty of up to $25,000. r � 4N J: C {# i -Syti '2 1f 4 1 I E i s FT ' • 1 , • � � � � 1 � •1 � 1 0 �o� T .i yLr pp � {M1 fTI, cit i � 1 w� s �1 Y t I X ' Q�� 3� ♦.may d� va _ 1J �t�• AS - •� t — d'` k ' M; #1 1 f k { &r t ME!; a° r ;? ,} R3a F Y X: S� a, 1 rs °. }y X TABLE I incidence of Comparison Shopping by Individual Trades Prefer To Shop Loyd . ..: Several To One Places Plan Tota] Type ofShoppia8 - % % % 1.Service Stations 54.7 . .` 45.3 100.0 2. Liquor Stores' 45.6 54.4 100.0 3. Shopping Centers 76.8 . .. 23.2 100.0 4. Theatres 96.4. ' °' 3.6 100.0 5. Drug Stores 45.9- 54.1 100.0. 6. Fast Food Restaurants 79.1 20.9 100.0 7."Auto Dealers 76.2 23.8 100.0 8. Banks 29.8 70.2 100.0 9. Builders Supplies 70.0 30.0 100.0 10. Floor Covering Stores 68.3 31.7` _100.0 11. Furniture Stores 88.5 11.5 100.0 12. Clothing Stores 96.2 3.8 100.0 13. Motels 79.4 20.6 100.0 14. Home Improvement Stores_ 66.0 34.0 100.0 - 15. Garden Supplies 66.0 34.0 100.0 Mean Averages` 69.3 30.7 100.0 TABLE IL Consolidated Results of Four Public Opinion Surveys on the Importance of On-Premise Signs to the Public When Shopping " for Specific Products or Services Very Not Impertant Important Total Type of Business % % % 1. Supermarkets 77.1 22.9 100.0 2. Banks 77.7 22.3 100.0 3. Motels 82.7 17.3 100.0 4. Shopping Centers 62.3 37.7 100.0 5. Home Improvement Stores 61.2 38.8 100.0 6. Fast Food Restaurants 84.2 15.8 100.0 7. Service SLations a. At home 67.2 32.8 100.0 b. On a trip 95.0 5.0 100.0 8. Auto Dealers, 77.3 22.7 100.0 9. Furniture Stores 83.5 16.5 100.0 10. Garden Supply Stores 61.2 38.8 100.0 ' 11. Hardware Stores 71.8 28.2 100.0 12. Floor Covering Stores 92.9 7.1 100.0 13. Clothing Stores 73.6 26.4 100.0 14. Discount Stores 79.1 20.9 100.0 15. Theatres 85.8 _ 14.2 100.0 16. Drug Stores 77.6 22.4: .100.0 17. Liquor Stores 82.6 17.4 100.0 ' 18. Builder Supplies 78.5 21.5 100.0 y .f Mean Averages77.4 22.6 100.0 TABLE ffi Becall of Specific On-Premise Signs in the Respondents'Area and Attitudes Toward These Individual Signs A B C Recsn Useful seeing Type Approve Type of Business Sign Sign '::Appearance 1. Bank 51.3 76.8 80.1 2. Motel 73.1 85.3 89.7 3. Shopping Center 77.0 67.8 80.0 4. Fast Food Restaurant 72.7 81.0 80.8 5. Service Station 45.4 80.9. 85.6, 6.';Auto Dealer 69.7 78.7 7"x.5 7. Furniture Store 38.6 71:9 80.4 8. Theatre 72.0 81.7 82.3 Mean Averages 62.5 78.0 82.1, �yBLE /Special Information the Public Would Like To See on Service Station On=Premise Signs Unaided Response Information Des'ved 1. Gasoline price 73.937 9 2. Automotive products soldthere 29.7 3. Mechanic service available 25 4 4. Type of service available(full or self) 19.2 5. Other products sold there Nute:The above is in addition to the brand of gasoline. WIN Philip R, McCurdy, Architect 1 8040 N,E.Sandy Blvd, Portland,Oregon 97213 (503)282-5477 t i VITAL 'ROLE OF SERVICE STATION PRICE AND SERVICES SIGNAGE I 1. People are often many miles from home, in need of services that are j immediate! ' Price and service information signage is essential informa- tion. The functional value of this type of signage is often overlooked or abandoned in favor of aesthetics. l 2. Price and service information signage plays a' key role in the economic well being of the service station operator. Severe regula- tion of this signage overlooks the economic importance for the business owners. 3. Aesthetics in trade for vital pricing and services information is not supported by the public.- (See 'National Electric Sign Association graphs.) The public requests this type of signage at a location visible to the public. 4. The pricing and services information signage is treated by the sign ordinance as an optional form of communication. In actuality, this type_ of signage is the only link to the customer or prospect, it is not an option, and is critically important, more important than any other form of advertising. 5. Because of signage abuses within the community, local planning agencies often over-react, or lack necessary information resulting in restrictions that are inappropriate and too severe for specific type of businesses. An understanding of the "target market" for any part- icular business is essential for making appropriate code restrictions. The bottom line is ... can the aesthetic values intended by the sign ordinance not conflict with the special needs of service station signage? I believe two well designed, well placed and effective on premise signs can actually reduce the total sign area and possible number of on-building signs.. The result being less building sign clutter with definite aesthetic rewards for the community. Guidelines for establishing the aesthetic quality of signage should address the entire site, and not be so structured as to conflict with special business needs and state or federal regulations. End 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 87-07 SIGN CODE - CHAPTER 18.114 Request by the City ,of Tigard to review proposed _amendments to Section 18.114 (signs) of the Community Development Code. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the types of changes being proposed. He explained that the Commission did not have act on this item tonight, however,; they would like input,; then table the item to the January 5th hearing. o Discussion followed regarding the size of signs for the CP zone, trade off options, enforcement, what other jurisdiction are doing, especially with gas stations and Billboard/outdoor signs. o Senior- Planner Liden stated if the Commissioners come up with other concerns to' please-call staff so their concerns could be addressed. President Moen moved and Commissioner Newton seconded to table ZOA 87-07 to the January 5th Planning Commission hearing. Motion passed unanimously by Commissioners present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o Commissioner Owens explained that she would no longer be able to participateasa member,of the Tigard TransportationAdvisory Committee (TTAC) and that another Planning Commissioner needed to take her place. A decision should be made by the January 5th hearing date as to who will replace her. 7. ADJOURNMENT 11:15 PM Diane M. Jelde , Secretary i ATTEST: i A. Donald Moen, President C i i dmj/2320D PIeANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 15, 1987 - Page 6 4 AGENDA ITnM 5.9 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION I MEMORANDUM DECEMBER 15 1987 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON November 24, 1987 i TO: Planning Commission Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planner* FROM: SUBJECT: z0A 87-07 Sign Code-Chapter 18.114 the first draft of 70A 87-07 which proposes revisions to Attached is a copy of the sign code. The following summarizes the changes made: _ 18.114,015 - including definitions for flush , forming signs, - 1. New and improved :definitions pitched roof signs, noncon &Oning, signs, balloons, time and temperature signs. ening to allow one hot air balloon and one banner 2. provisions for grand op events. for C-N and C-P zone standards. Note: liit wording Commission. 3. New more eXpcthe Planning Dimensions are to be discussed by WM permit requirements. 4. Insertion of sign P g. A new Section 18.114.085 which clarifies how s igns are to be measured. 6, Deletions in wording to make code content-neutral the • 7. . Regulations for electronic variable message flashing. criteria for apF>r'oval of a mini-variance which A new Section 18.114.148, nonconforming signs or a proposed new sign. g. will apply to existing is/1979D Attachment 4 11 (4c() lj 4-u (��-�' (�`�. �� l�%G t'/•f 5 U i r!Cr't^.L,l j�i''l V G( dCl '� P ( . tt-77 2- 0 (C,) I r tr 11 ACid II fi b 64, �! � C lt,c 7'� Cc.✓ �i✓L ��C, r�.<:r.l �L+ l'L',Lt.c�J�; ".j`, C/.: q` r \ r Lo �.J c •.." _`� (�. kt4- p 15, P• 2- ''3;l��a� 11�oa ,3'Yuc,4Ute' I, t Led j - S �A t 61 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 18, 1988 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator/ SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES LEGISLATIVE INVOLVEMENT I have been asked to serve on the League of Oregon Cities Finance and Taxation Committee. I have expressed interest and tentatively accepted subject to Council approval regarding time and involvement. Is this consistent with Council intent regarding staff intergovernmental activity? If not, I will decline. RECOMMEND: Authorize City Administrator involvement on League of Oregon Cities Finance and Taxation Committee. BJ:mh i g -Oreao F Y k Yv/` .8 9 1201 Court Street NE, P.O.Box 928,Salem,Oregon 97308 FEBRUARY 1988 LEAGUE POLICY DEVELOPMENT 'PROCESS ADOPTED At its first meeting in 1988, the League's Board of Directors approved the framework for increased city involvement in future legislative matters. Under the new framework representatives on the League's Lenislative Committee will be charged with the additional responsibility of<leading the effort to strengthen state/local government relations. Four permanent Standing Committees were created to assume greater ongoing responsibility for municipal policy development that 'cuts across structural or departmental lines, while two areas,energy and transportation, were singled out for attention through the use of two specific Issue Committees. The specific issue committees,although not considered "permanent" in nature, will also develop multi-year recommendations. For the past several years, the League's Legislative Committee has been charged with the overwhelming responsibility for city policy development. Historically, the committee has been comprised of over 50 elected and appointed officials representing cities both geographically and by population. Additional representation from local government associations such as finance officers, police and fire officials has added some specific expertise to the group. The Legislative Committed has been augmented by the work of other interested city officials, organized into five Legislative Subcommittees. After an intensive summer's work during each legislative interim year, the Subcommittee reports have been forwarded in September to the Legislative Committee; the committee has,then sorted and selected those issues which would form the League's legislative positions and/or be referred to the League membership as a resolu- tion or Oregon Municipal Policy amendment. By the end of the annual League Conference preceding the regular legislative session, the active work of the subcommittees is suspended and the Legislative Com- mittee has fulfilled most of its responsibilities for the legislative session. The restructuring of the policy development process is targeted, over the long term, to establish a broader role for Legislative committee members to initiate discussion of city concerns with state, business and other leaders and to formulate multi-year policy objectives. Beginning with the spring 1988 Legislative committee meeting, committee members will lead cities' efforts at the local level They will direct their efforts toward enhancing city officials' understanding of local government legislative issues; improving the use of news media and regional coalitions to foster awareness of municipal problems and policies; and improving effective city/legislator commu- nications. The Legislative Committee will con- CONTENTS tinue to determine the composition of the League's legislative proposals and positions but League News . . . . . . . . . . 2 will put increased reliance on the efforts of the Oregon Update . . . . . 3 standing and issue committees to identify long- Publications . 4 and short-term policy goals, target resources, Federal Affairs . . . . . . . . . 4 conduct research, and provide better opportu- Calendar . . . . . . . . . 5 nities,to discuss long-term policy direction. One Budgets and Ballots Workshop . 7 of the obvious changes to the process will be the Help Wanted . . . . . . . . . 8 creation of more permanent standing or issue Professional Directory . . . . . . . . 9 committees instead of the Legislative NLC Congressional City Conference . . 10 Subcommittees. The four standing committees INSERT.- 1987 Awards for Excellence Winners are for the areas of Community Development, (Continued on page 2.) n 111112, 1 Eli! (Continued from page 1.) Finance and Taxation, General Government, and Personnel; a new specific issue Committee will work on Transportation. These committees are established to provide an ongoing, long-range policy direction as well as focus on the next legislative agenda. The Standing Committees are expected to be composed of a small number of individuals having specific knowledge of subject areas or a strong commitment to th(r- committee. They will be asked to assist League staff in analysis of issues, research the impacts of alter- native policies, focus on-problem-solving, and make policy recommendations. An effective standing com- mittee system will require the efforts of individuals who are willing to commit to a continuous"role in policy development. Call for Volunteers. The League is currently seeking volunteers to serve both the Legislative Committee and each Standing Committee and the Issue Committee on Transnortation.> Letters of interest should be submitted to the League by March 7.- Appointments will be made shortly thereafter. All committees will begin to meet in early spring. The Board and the League staff are excited about the potential benefits of this effort! Please call us if you wish to discuss how you and your city can participate. Appointments made to Transporta- Formed in 1983, the Energy Advisory Committee tion' and Energy Advisory Committees follows major issues such as the Northwest Con- servation and Electric Power Plan, 'BPA policies At the January meeting, the League Board of and programs affecting local government, the Dbiennial state energy plans, and local government Directors selected new committee members for two activities at the significant policy advisory committees which Oregon Department of Energy. operate continuously throughout the year to dis- Councilor Forrest Soth, Beaverton, Councilor cuss intergovernmental policy concerns. Susan Reid, Ashland, and Jane Cummins, League The Board appointed three representatives to the Staff Associate, were also appointed as the League's representatives on the BPA, Local and Local Officials Advisory Committee (COAG) to the Tribal Governments and State Consultation Group Oregon Transportation Commission for two-year for 1988. terms. The 1988-89 appointees are Jim Gilroy, - Mayor, Cottage Grove; and Becky Lu Brown, City The League Board extends its appreciation to all Administrator, ;Sisters. Mayor Larry Cole of of those who applied for a position on these Beaverton was reappointed, and is now serving as committees, as well as those city` officials who Vice-Chairperson of LOAC. The new members gave of their time and expertise on the committees' will replace Councilor Candace Bartow, Grants over the past year. Pass, and Public Works Director Tom Gellner of Bend. The new appointees join Councilor Loran Weise, New members appointed to Coquille; City Engineer Pat Napolitano, Her- Legal Advocacy Review Committee miston, and Transportation Development Manager Dan Meinert, Corvallis, who have one year left in In November 1983, the League established the their terms. Legal Advocacy Review Committee (LARC) to recommend those instances in which the League LOAC was created in 1978 by agreement among should file amicus briefs or institute litigation the League, the Association of Oregon Counties, where significant or broad case law decisions and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Its could impact the principles of city governance. purpose is to function in an advisory capacity to The League Board, at its January meeting, the Transportation Commission on department and appointed two new members, Mayor Shirley policy matters where there is a shared state and Huffman, Hillsboro, and City Manager Steve local government interest. Rhodes, Tualatin. The new members replace Councilor Forrest Soth, Beaverton, and City The League's Board also appointed five new Manager Bill Barrons, Albany. Members serving members to the Energy Advisory Committee. The continuing terms are: City Attorney Ron Bryant, 1988 city committee members are Forrest Soth, Metolius; City Attorney Gene Hart, Medford; City Councilor, Beaverton; Building and Safety Attorney Tim Sercombe, Eugene; City Attorne( Administrator John Elegant, Salem; Mayor Nancy Tom Sponsler, Gresham; and City Manager Pete-, r Kirkscy, Woodburn; City Administrator Henry Harvey, Lake Oswego. LARC is funded by volun- Hartley, Prineville; and Wastewater Treatment tary contributions from member cities. Services Manager Floyd Collins,Salem. 2 ff