The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 02/22/1988 YNRRS[R Rills I I@1 — a 1 al R108i iTRI IIRhA RRB•]I IFf�llB U P D A T E TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA —CATV sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, 'FEBRUARY 22, 1988, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a.future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. o STUDY SESSION Executive Session Called to Order at 6:41; recessed 7:20 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1Call To Order and Roll Call - All Council Present 12 Pledge of Allegiance - Led by Boy Scout Troop 843 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA No one spoke 3. POLICE K-9 OFFICER RECOGNITION o Mayor Brian - Keys to City to K-9 Officers Joey (Posthumously), Major and Buck. Swore in K-9 Officers Abel and`Juup. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. < Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes - January 18, 1988 4.2 Receive and File Monthly Reports - January, 1968: a. Finance b. Library c. Police 4.3 Receive and File Draft Final of Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study 4.4 Authorize City Employees To Purchase Federal & State Surplus Property - Resolution No. 88-16 4.6 Approve Training Request- 1988 ACSM-ASPRS Convention- $980 JO/EA UA (with 4.5 and 4.7 pulled for separate consideration) 4.5 Approve Computer Equipment Purchase Resolution No. Be Council consensus have Budget Committee review 4.7 Approve State Funding Receipt For Bikeway Improvements - McDonald Street - and Authorize Mayor and City Recorder To Sign - Resolution No. 88-17 - JO/EA UA 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 1987-88 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET Resolution No. e8-17 (A) - WED UA 6. LOADING ZONE DESIGNATION ON 87TH AVE. -ORDINANCE NO. 88-03 - ED/EA UA 7, - PROHIBIT PARKING ON FOUR STREETS (Portions of SW Burnham, SW Gaarde, SW Locust, & SW 69th) ORDIWAME NO. 88-04 - As amended (eliminate reference to Gaarde Street in ordinance) - JO/ED UA 8,- NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff Access Oregon Resolution No. 80-19 JO/SC UA Cancelled 3/7/88 Council Meeting 9, EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive,Session at 9:20 p.m, under the provisions of QRS 192,660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10. ADJOURNMENT 10:51 P.M. lw/31860 iOUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 22, 1988 PAGE 1 Y; IN MIMI= t 9 , TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on 6e appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA -;CATV sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet,is'available, FEBRUARY 22, 1988, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by thA Chair at the start TIGARD CYVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 6:30 0 STUDY SESSION - Executive Session & Agenda Review_ 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: '. 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 -Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 7:35 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Lead-Per Issue, Please) 7;40 3. POLICE K-9 OFFICER RECOGNITION o Mayor Brian WA 7:50 4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 4.1 Approve Council Minutes - January 18, 1988 4.2_Receive and File Monthly Reports -,January, 1988: a. Finance b. Library c. Police 43 Receive and File Draft Final of Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study 4.4 Authorize City Employees To Purchase Federal & State Surplus - Property Resolution No. 88—J&_ 4.5 Approve Computes Equipment Purchase - Resolution No. 88- 4.6_ Approve Training Request -'1988 ACSM-ASPRS Convention-WE 4.7 Approve State Funding Receipt For Bikeway Improvements - McDonald Street - and Authorize Mayor and City Recorder To Sign Resolution No. 88-.E- 8:00 8-.8:00 9. PUBLIC HEARING -1987-88 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations or Challenges o Summation By Budget Offices o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Budget Officer 0 Council Questions Or Comments o :: Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council: Resolution No. 88--ii 8:15 6. LOADING ZONE DESIGNATION ON 87TH AVENUE —ORDINANCE NO. 884_3 o Acting Community Development Director 8:20 7. PROHIBIT PARKING ON FOUR STREETS —ORDINANCE NO. 88-0 Portions of SW Burnham, SW Gaarde, SW Locust, & SW 69th o Acting Community Development Director 8:25 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 800 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10800 10. ADJOURNMENT lw/3186➢ COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1988 - PAGE i s T I G A R D CI TY CO UNC-IL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 22,'1988 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL _: Present: Tom Brian, Mayor; Councilor's Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, Valerie Johnson, John Schwartz. Staff Present: Janice Deardorff, Personnel Manager (present for Executive Session--9:20 p.m.); Bob Jean, City Administrator; Wayne Lowry, Finance _Director; ' David Lehr, Chief of Police Jill' Monley, Community Services Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel or City Attorney; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder, and Randy Wooley, Acting_Community Development Director/City Engineer. Others present: Gerry McReynolds, Utility and Franchise (present for Executive session during study session only) . 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:41 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660(1)(d),_ (e), y and (h) to discuss labor relations real property transactions and current and pending litigation issues. Recessed Executive Session at 7:20 p.m. i (Reception was held in the Town Hall at the Civic Center• Lobby in honor of-the ! K-9 officers.) 3. Meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m. by Mayor Brian. Boy Scout Troup No. 843 led the Council and audience in the Pledge of { Allegiance to the Flag. 1 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA No one spoke. 5. POLICE K-9 OFFICER RECOGNITION E a. Keys to the City. Mayor advised that the Tigard Police Department, since 1982, has maintained K-9 program. Original members of the K-9 team included: Sgt. Chuck Martin and his K-9 Officer Joey Officer Darwin Deveny and his K-9 Officer Major. Officer John Nerski and his K-9 Officer Buck (Buck joined the team in 1983 and his handler in 1984.) Officer Joey retired in 1985 and subsequently died in 1987. Officers' Major and Buck retired in 1987. Since the retirement of Officer Major and Buck, the department has appointed Officers' Marlow Fischer, and Gary Wayt as 14-9 handlers. Their K-9 partners are Officers' Abel and Juup, respectively. The K-9 program has been of great value to the Police t Department. K--9 teams have been responsible for the arrest of numerous felons including burglars and armed robbers. The use of K-9's have often greatly reduced the risk to officer's in a high risk arrest situation. They have also been involved in numerous E Rage 1 COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 22, 1988 ts K-9 demonstrations at community d�n`�nstrandc�r demonstrations have schools Crean the Tigard School District, Theseof good will great deal of from Tigard citizens to the City Tigard. Mayor Brian, in recognizing the contribution of K-9s to community safety and the positive image of the Police Department, presented to K-9 Officers' Joey (posthumously), Major and l Keys to ,the City i Buck. Major and Buck came forward with their handlers to receive their' keys. t, b. Oath of Office - K-9 Officers tt Abel Mayor Brian administered the Oath oreoffice Policet`Depa9iofficers Mayor 4 and Juup as 'official members of Lh ld advised, this was being done (as wouthe practice wash all ' to :.the .department)) to illustrate. the K-9 � new officers coming Officers' response to commands. 7• CONSENT AGENDA Councilor Johnson, seconded by Edwards, to approve a. Motion by Co ds sked that items .5 consent agenda. -Count � a ate di.s ussion. Mayo Brian pulled from consent agenda forsep asked for vote on the motion as amended. 1 .1 Approve Council Minutes - January 18, 19881988: 2 ' Receive and File Monthly Reports - January, a. Finance b, Library c. Police .3; Receive and File Draft Final of Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban ,Services Study 4 Authorze 'C,ity Employe<as To purchase Federal & State Surplus Property - Resolution No. 88-16 .6 Approve Training Request - 1988 ACSM-•ASPRS Convention - $960 The amended motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. b. Item .5 - Approve Computer Equipment Purchase employee computer .s City Administrator explained the need f Systems msloManager, has access. Bruce Olson, the new Computer' revised it reviewed the computer User's' Committee's re8ue1988ntd o Mayor and considerably. (See memorandum of February Council from Bob Jean, City Administrator, concerning Computer Systems Needs.) Recommendation of staff was: o Support of the Computer System Manager's revised recommendation o Council motion to approve $19,700 Contingency appropriation for the recommended computer hardware for d softwCouncil purchases resolution was provided meeting packets). page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 22, 1998 Councilor Edwards said that he required more information on past recommendations before he could approve this budget request. Councilor Johnson also indicated that she would like to receive more information. Councilor Johnson said her,understanding was that the Computer 'System Analyst had been hired to work with the organization for- a- time to determine computer--system needs. She indicated she was surprised this recommendation was "made so soon after his employment with the City. CouncilorEadon agreed that this request should go before the Budget Committee on March 1 with more information submitted for review. Council Eadon said she recognized, 'however, the need to utilize the computer equipment to the fullest and would have a problem waiting much beyond March 1. After discussion, Council consensus was that they would like to meet the Computer System Analyst, Bruce Olson, at the March 1 Budget Committee meeting. Further-, Council consensus was that this 'request would be considered at the Budget Committee meeting. C. Item .7 Approve State Funding Receipt For Bikeway Improvements McDonald Street - and Authorize Mayor and City Recorder To Sign Councilor, Edwards asked for, clarification on the scope ,of this project and whether or not any of the Councilors felt that the $6,200 could be better, spent elsewhere. Acting Community Development Director rioted that this project would be matched by about $24,000 from the State, He advised that this area was heavily traveled but had no shoulder for safety. As part of the regional bike system, ' this was the only City street which qualified for State matching funds. RESOLUTION NUMBER 88-17. A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON SW MCDONALD STREET. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor, Eadon, to approve Resolution No. 88-17. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 8. PUBLIC HEARING - 1987-88 - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET. a. Public Hearing opened. b. Declarations or challenges - there were none. C. Summation by Budget Officer (Bob Jean) The Tigard Budget Committee discussed the proposed Supplemental Budget at a public meeting held January 12, 1988. The Budget Committee approved a Supplemental Budget with certain revisions Page 3 COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 22, 1988 j Boom and recommended that it be adopted by City Council. Since the Budget Committee recommendation, revenue in the amount of $10,566 is now anticipated from a soon—to—be-considered contract with Unified Sewerage Agency for, the maintenance of the Durham Treatment Plant grounds. It .is within the City Council's authority to include this revenue and the related appropriation in the Supplemental Budget without republishing and holding a second hearing. Staff had submitted two resolutions for consideration. Resolution "A" reflected_ the Supplemental Budget as recommended by the Budget Committee. Resolution "B reflected the Committee's recommendation and the inclusion of $10,566 as a General Fund resource and ;as an appropriation in the Community Development Program for park/grounds maintenance. Budget Officer advised that formal contract: approval by U.S.A. is set for early March. He explained he was proposing to include this in the supplemental budget process at this time so that all changes could be incorporated at once: d. Mayor called for public testimony. There was none, e. The Budget Officer recommended the adoption of Resolution "B" which included anticipated revenue from the "Unified Sewerage Agency;Contract. f. Councilor Eadon asked for- clarification on the USA Contract. The Budget Officer responded that this was for grounds' maintenance at the Durham Plant. "Profit" from the contract would help the parks maintenance city wide. g. Mayor expressed some concern over the ability of existing staff - to do' this work. Budget Officer noted that the Parks Supervisor r had planned to take care of extra workload by utilization of- seasonal help; therefore, the FTE for this work would riot be "institutionalized" into the regular City FTE. h. Councilor Johnson said she was not comfortable with the margin in this agreement; this could end up costing the City some money. She reminded Council of expensive budget items, such as th^ mowers, which would be getting more useage. Budget Officer noised that when reviewing this proposal, he had asked staff to check depreciation and extra workload on equipment which was figured into the costs. Ne noted he felt comfortable with the figures which were presented. i. Councilor Johnson said that she was not sure that anything would be gained procedurally by adopting Resolution "B." She said she would prefer to wai`: to appropriate budget funds when the contract comes before Council. j. Councilor Edwards also expressed preference to wait until the USA contract was final as it appeared there would be no harm in waiting, Procedurally, he said he could support Resolution A. Page 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 22, 1900 which were described in his memorandum dated January 29, 1988 (said memorandum was provided in the meeting packet). Also included in the packet was an ordinance which would adopt the City Engineer's recommendations. b, Councilor Edwards noted he had visited these sites. He" advised he had specific concerns with the Gaarrde street no 'parking"" recomendation and the possibility of limiting parking that it would disallow visitors in the area. that } C. Acting Community Development Director noted Gaarde tstrcetgbe Police Department recommended parking on eliminated far, a minimum of 80 feet: east of 110th Avenue to improve sight distance. Acting Community Development Director advised that no objections had been received from the' proraerty owner (Mr. Brad Parrott) of the apartment: building located across from ttie 'proposed "no parking" area. Mr. 'Parrott had received not that this ordinance would be considered by Council. Xi (See letter of September 17, 1987 from Brad M. Parratt which was ' included in tile meeting packet.)' 4 There was Council discussion as to whether or not there was a sight--distance problem at this intersection as well as discussion on the length of the "no parking" zone. Councilor Eadon noted she had observed some hesitancies by motorists at the intersection which may have been related to sight--distance difficulties. Councilor Johnson advisedshe had never- perceived any sight--distance problems when she had traveled � by this intersection. There was discussion on .reducing the length of the "no parking" j that zone ' Mayor'commented that he was not an engineerand no�padrking" the Police Department was also recommending in supporting strip. He advised that he would have difficulty any amendment that would make this area smaller. i Acting community Development Director (City Engineer) noted that 80 feet was the amount that the Police Department had recommended. He had also taken a measurement in the field and felt comfortable with this recommendation. He further advised he did not perceive a problem with inadequate on-street parking in this area. 88-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING "CMC 10.28.130, d, ORDINANCE N0. I PROHIBITING PARKING ON PORTIONS OF SW BURNHAM STREET, SW 69TH f AVENUE, SW LOCUST STREET, AND SW GAARDE STREET, AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion' by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Mayor Brian, to adopt Ordinance 88-04, The motion failed; Councilors Johnson, Edwards, and Schwartz noted nay. I f i Page 6 COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 22, 1988 t im WISM N= e, There was further Council discussion on concerns with the ordinance as outlined for Gaarde Street. This discussion included the limited 'street parking available and whether or not the recommendation for 80 feet of "no parking" was excessive. Councilor Eadon noted concerns with safety issues and visibility, Councilor Johnson suggested the ordinance be amended by deleting reference to the Gaarde Street "no parking" zone at this time; f. Motion by ,Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to amend Ordinance 88-04 by deleting Section 2 of the ordinance and all other mention of S.W. Gaarde Street within that ordinance. The motion was approved by majority vote of .Council; Councilor Eadon voted nay. g, ORDINANCE' N0, 88--04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TMC 10.28,130, PROHIBITING PARKING ON PORTIONS OF SW' BURNHAM, SW 69TH AVENUE, AND SW LOCUST STREET, AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to adopt Ordinance No, 88-•04, The Ordinance was adopted by a unanimous vote of Council present. h. it was noted ;by Councilor Edwards that he would like more information on SW Gaarde Street. Specifically, he would like to review backup data (i.e, accident history) as to why this parking restriction was necessary at this time. Councilor ' Johnson indicated a desire to visit the site as well. i.' Mayor requested the Acting Community Development Director reexamine the intersection to determine if a further, parking e the minimum restriction was necessary and, if so, calculatpace required for safety. The Mayor requested the Acting community Development Director to bring his recommendation to Council for consideration. 11. NON—AGENDA ITEMS a, RESOUTRAMAND ION NO. 88-19 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE "ACCESS OREGON" RECOMMENDING PROJECTS AS PRIORITY IMPROVEMENTS PROG PROG Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor, Schwartz, to approve Resolution No. 88-19. Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. b, There was brief discussion concerning a letter from E. S. Mills, City Manager far the City of Hillsboro. This letter, February 4, 1988, was concerning street lights in new subdivisions in unincorporated Washington County. Page 7 COUNCIL_ MINUTES — FEBRUARY 22, 1988 now The City Administrator recommended the City of Tigard support urging the County to; adopt street lighting standards similar to the city. Currently, the County is ,approving street lights on a schedule not compatible to the City. When these areas are annexed, into Washington County cities, they do not conform to city requirements. Councilor, Johnson suggested the City acknowledge to Beaverton and Hillsboro that this was an issue the City of Tigard would review id and would be scheduled for, the earliest agenda time available. }} 9 Mayor asked the City Administrator to send a letter to E. S. r Mills of Hillsboro 'acknowledging the letter and that the City of Tigard shared his concerns with regard to the street lighting , standards. E F, C; Fanno Creek 'Conference - Councilor Johnson reported on the Fanno i CreekConference scheduled for February 27 at ' the Tigard High ' School, Councilor Johnson invited attendance and described registration procedures, 12. EXECUTIVE SESUCE - The 'Tigard City Council reconvened at 9:20 p.m. ' into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d), (e), and (h) to discuss labor, relations, real' property transactions, ' and ; current and pending litigation issues. 4. 14. ADJOURNMENT: 10:51 p.m. Approved by the Tigard City Council on March 14, 1988. `,` l , Deputy Recorder -Cityof Tigar I ATTEST: t t Mayor — City of Tigard t CW/3463D s . t { i i f { Page 8 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 22, 1998 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice i BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 RECEIVED i Legal Notice Advertising � a ❑ Tearsheet Notice I E B 2 21988 . � 0 ❑-Duplicate,'Affidavit CI. "W ,.,CARD AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss. I,` being first duly sworn,depose and ffay th 6 am t `A&!ertisin Director,or his principal clerk,of the ' a newspaper of general circultuo as de din-0RS 193.010 and 993.020;,published atin the aforesaid o an tate;td thdl a'printed co of which is hereto annexed,was published in the E entire issue of said newspaper for` ,L—successive and consecutive in the following issues: i Subscribed a s- n to before me this–P�j /9P i tY P otary Public for Oregon My Comi"ssipir"s:`9D-�� ..++F4e. S r i4z^°„ a . ',t �•'k r k tS" s`�,,¢ t AFFIDAVIT: miFoaB €� s; pour Ii4mrrezalo 1d-fti Ob stq t tt€e 0t tec�r` r��}c E+�dL�,��r. �r�gxff.w�"s��,, f4t+ ,try Y��,.a2F a° 7 oi,5gne� � dup.P -4�ii+if�'j�53t5lL.taBcFgz � ifiA. irf x inti "79i�7�*3Z�1,� ,z. u yY t { e F'�az27s"y�f t.,�.grxf �"' �`i` ✓ srka A ,1 � E ipr; PE tv t r t s n p Oyu e G y 3 `ua iffy 1a C W ii`;� +t� V S !",3i'� 43 � ` 7 v Akre 7 � { , >:<i t qy-fi�Jg; MrSMAYM TIMES PUBLISHING�SCOMPA NY REG�Lega 7-4, P.O.BOX 370 PHONE BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising FEB 16 1988 e � r ° ❑ Tearsheet Notice (i;.`RTARD ® O ® El Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, )ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, qk ) �.. I, being first duty sworn, depose and say tit I am th A�rtis Director,or his principal clerk, of the- a newspaper of general circulatio s def e�in ORS 193.010 and 193.020;published at 1!' in the afores unt an st t •that the a printed copy f which is hereto nnexed,was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and consecutive in the following issues: ZZ, C d SubaCribed.anc� rorn to,betore me111 this 'NotaryPublic for Oregon ¢". .. -'- •---^-+— t,-, pry < a ;. tv°"'."�.0}s . My Comrnl MAN* ° 3ra ';* 7 AFiH�A�e• 1f l2 4jyq� [Y � f 't ,,yrt rr dYjtsfi3'P.t � '}'ty A tEu�li;o��cl�°o�4tie �?14!'� � a ' aratMOM" 'Jig �+ �� jill RUN { xcm�®��m�z>rs,��Ta�T�t,r��rr I3I?ARIx13 s t TIMES PUBLISHING! COMPANY Legalr]-�z34 P.O.BOX 310. PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice YnGCt111 0 tbramrfA$ril(qty+(AU71Ctb;�i1)bC'tfatd°O4JY"`2�Ft6a5'�� :. BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 RC.�1 ' 1�$,st?,i?.l.I B�t1la-xt�trd Cti'I"�,Caster I3I7te C 91f�, 1C'I1I` �(ei°aT� Legal Notice Advertising rFQ vF0 e�?"?�sod�bytbafi�il�� dl3ad��tCammt Asa$lgeoq t'1 o4,5ia Supp}ameatal t 18 patedl bP{OTr A eopy 0@tIu{' le- 1 ° ❑ Tearsheet Notice 8 98 tal Budget may k��t�t� C{� c C �{ nv ��Fr� e 0RD�3125$6/13aliEhvd 1d„OreSvbehcaeatfib4RrdbfpP2dfiAd' ° ❑ D ":ate Affidavits CITY©FTIGAkU ° .d. oX Z33`I"i yuQ SupptbmeritalHugatFinansietSumma*8 u^ ° F®r tba F15csI�°C IUA9--3s F ik 1 I2eclssd Supp�ameotiil hdapted. 1�SIt9- r � Si,Sd�t 84d&Ct AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION QTa1 Ilutd i'�XtS` :' fi2,�30I$A �ID004 f"a,044,18$�°- STATE OF OREGON, )ss cTtrerAgaactea 8°5K7T2 SI,S + 94771. COUNTY F WASHI GTON, ) F$s stCbarSss 46t),009f t90000 i X66000' FluaB:eod Forfeit, I61$00 27,000 10�390: r� a 3�racshlseBers 76010 ` 74,790 807+300, being first duty sworn,depose and say that I am th6 rtising 3JsD4'do17YIap ; f9 19x040 iS$4$0: Director,or his principalbler(< x ff a newspaper of general circulation as define in ORS 193.010 y,SabrO+al ,,',' 461 ;T2 +. 138 1 43�,702 and 193.020;published at in the Haglnaingr odBai 1 42 fl.OQO efor said coon aqd tat • atAha TOr�1I 0E?t.RA1 FUND 88$0472 313037 614Z§ __50� \e 1Tu e ea a printed copy of which is herefoennexOd,was publi had in the Slade 6 85Ta� S36(Mfl 55, 31 {`693093`- entire issue of said newspaper for successive and Clf Aq, bTa: It?609 ' s $2,914 s 168,984, C Yt68Q I Evy 63 OG8 w`45,OR4 I25$84_ consecutive in the following issues: SDC 734800 7$5I 9i J,999 Pat�g$U.0 121900 38,710 1371120 r 4. 1�1��. +Sac1 'Fniid 1,21$,059 1791653 1,3+35>703. Sturttl �Utl>iiia$e>rund; P805di13 : I9,6BZir 01 9 Spaciathb ' 462309 46130= Dom, 0 K x) 2q�s�1100 `r` Y r9 t zr v Oi49113d2 z@15 i7g ' ♦. / �L DPS - T ,. S r �k —K � 1 c6c� FYfOGRAMS/DF..PAR1?RENTS �� r Subscribe swo 'before me ihi ` Caatmaalty+Soar/loere ?dace z32 028 A72 $ 4 ,8 2 92$1871” Rotary Public for Oregon C'otrimualtgS.ervlces 090834 , 0 634,334; g _ Ctuuclpai Co 110,840 MY Commisaioa Expires: • Lp• a Ithrary r . '497090 2229 4) ' Sal Sa1it 1$ AlrFl®A4liT l Tc4alCorism$xry 918��6 f #6 ' 'Ari 'i fl y , -00 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING rK In the Matter of the Proposed COUNCIL ADOPTED ORDINANCES STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of;Tigard ) �Ve�S being first duly sworn, on oath depose I, Daniva /14 , and say: That I posted in the fo �wig, public and) c nspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 2 ' which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated copy(s) of said ordinance(s) beiDq hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 260 day of _ter C� _ 198 . 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, SW Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon y; ~` Subscribed.. and sworn to before me this c�� day of �P c(LCdc�, 198c� Notary Public for Oregon U / My Commission Expires: sb/ed5,37A AGENDA ITEM /1 2 VISITOR'S AGENDA' DATE 2/22/88 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Pleasesign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the_agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through 'staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED x * qc OD co � ro OD 4 ,a �e p ac 14 N -H 14JJ X N K rl gg dt (a �V�4 N O ►+ 4-) int 47 p� Q 0 44 � a p co 4c 0 P 4J ;9O F3 1i T1 a a H a +) a* a N co ad a a it N $ a OD q v aD is is �c 44 4J M .14 41 O ' O rA h0 u .H a � � to a o 14 ri) 44 d A * :3� L is Nis C N41N9c fr int k W -X—w it q.X is O-X Rei �� I y�y t r 7f�y' N10=1'1811F 111112 1 Ram S+ud,g Sess 1L' 2/17/88' MWON THE PROPOSED O.D.O.T. SIX-YEAR PLAN FOR FY TIGARD AREA PROJECTS INCLUDED IN 1989-94 (FEB. 1988 DRAFT) FY 1989: Hall Blvd./Hwy 99W intersection improvements. Hwy. 99W at Canterbury Lane, signal and frontage road revisions. Scholls Ferry Road (MuiTay`to Fanno Creek), widening and signals. Durham Rd. (Hall-Upper Boones Ferry Rd.), bikeway. FY 1990: Scholls Ferry Rd. (Fanno Creek -- Hwy. 217), widening. Hall Blvd. (99W to McDonald), bikeway. Hall Blvd. at Burnham, signal and intersection improvements'. I-5/Hwy. 217 Interchange plan, completion of E.I.Q. (construction not yet scheduled). FY 1991: Hall Blvd. at Oak Street, turn lane. `FY 1993: Hall Blvd. at Pfaffle St., turn lane. Hall Blvd. at Washington Drive, turn lane. Hwy. 217/99W interchange revisions, final plans (construction not yet scheduled). FY 1994: Hwy. 99W at Fischer Rd., signal. NOTE: "Access Oregon" projects are not yet shown in the Six-Year Plan draft. An "Access Oregon" project suggested for funding is the I-5 to 99W segment of the Western By-pass. br/3252D CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA'ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 221. 1988 _ DATE SUBMIT—CED: February 16, 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Reco nim�ion_of PREVIOUS ACTION: Retiring K-9s and swearing in of new 9s PREPARED BY: 0hief of Police R DEPT HEAD HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 01(�~ REQUESTED BY Chie_f_tif Police INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard police Department, since 1982, has maintained ,a K-9 program, original members of the K-9 team included: Sgt. Chuck Martin and his K-9, Officer Joey; Officer Darwin Deveny and his K•-9, Officer Major. Officer Buck joined the team in 1983 and Officer John Nerski, his handler, in 1984. officer Joey retired in 1985 and subsequently died in 1987. Officers Major and Buck retired in 1987 Since the retirement of Officer Major and Buck, the Department has appointed Officers Marlow Fischer and Gary Wayt as K-9 handlers. ' Their K-9 partners are Officers Abel and Juup, respectively. The K-9 program has been, of great value to the Police Department.' K-9 teams have been responsible for the arrests of numerous felons, including burglars and armed robbers. The use of the K-9s have often greatly reduced the risk to officers in these high risk arrest situations. They have also been involved in numerous K-9 demonstrations at community events and at schools in the Tigard School District. These demonstrations have created a great deal of goodwill from Tigard citizens to the City of Tigard. We are, tonight, recognizing the contributions of the K-9s to community safety and the positive image of the Police Department. Handlers treat their K--9s as and t e positive ers, as they truly are We are presenting to K-9 officers Joey (posthumously), Major and Buck keys to the City recognizing their contributions to the community. We are also swearing in K-9 Officers Abel and Juup as official members of the - Police Department, as is our practice with all new officers coming to the Department. We expect that Officers Abel. and Juup will continue the tradition of community service established by their predecessors. SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Award keys to the City to K-9 Officers Joey (posthumously), Major and Buck recognizing their achievements. 2. Swear in K-9 Officers Abel and Juup as official members of the Tigard Police Department. cs/3220D -t a ;; , CITY OF TIGARD MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT-JANUARY 1986 1987-66 JANUARY 198%-88 REVISED 1988 b/C APPROVED REVENUES BUDGET ACTUAL SUPPLEMENTAL (JAN 1988) YTD BUDGET GENERAL FUND ----------- ----------- -------- TAXES $2.030.190 $1.679.379 $2.04D.19D' HER AGENCIES 695,772 419.462 747 �7 GEE AND CHARGES 660.000 495.309 766.000 FINES AND FORFEITURES 181,500 117.593 _ 208.500 FRANCHISE FEES 788,010 152.458 802,800 USE OF MONEY/PROF 159.000 - '70.285 169.000 OTHER REVENUE 96.000 26,574 116,000 SUBTOTAL 4,610,472 2.961.060 4.649,762 BEGINNING FUND PAL 1.240,000 1.314.661 1,314.661 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5.850.472 4,275.721 6.164,423 STATE GAS TAX 838,000 570.099 893.093 COUNTY GAS TAX 117,000 134.999 169.914 COUNTY ROAD LEVY 83,000 17-2.172 128.984 STREETS SDC 754,500 884.574 909.669 PARKS SDC 121,000 84.360 157,120 'SEWER FUND 1,213.050 1:109.261 1,385.703 STORM DRAINAGE FUND 630,500 7.69,540 610.60B SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 4,623,950 330.392 4.623,950 `BOND DEBT FUND 260,500 205.775 274.356 TOTAL REVENUES $14,491.972 $8.096.893 3.15,317.822 PF:OGRAMS/DEPARTMENT5 C , UNITY SERVICES POLICE '2.028.872 $1,148.988 $2.026.872 COMMUNITY SERVICES 680,$34 3:7.0.564 680 6;4' MUNICIPAL COURT 119.640 47.039 119.64D r LIBRARY 400,900 203.807 410,180. SOCIAL SERVICES 45,600 33,891 45,600 TOTAL COMM SERV 3,275,846 1,764.269 3.285.12 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD ADMIN 299.064 143.090 305,864 DS BUILDING 254,333 129.142 265 3'3 DS PLANNING 281,004 134.741 269,004 DS ENGINEERING 238.491 125.027 259.591 PWAADMIN & BUILD 122.705 63,667 122.705 PW'SHOPS & SERVICES 103,950 42.118 103.950 PW WASTEWATER 298,504 185.776 7,16,544 PW STREETS&LIGHTS 596.0031 334.710 611.760 PW PARKS & GROUNDS 186.385 112.550 167,872 TOTAL COMM DEVELOP 2.382,439 1,271,021 2.464.643 POLICY & ADMINISTRATION 172,000 86,701 172,000 CITY WIDE SUPPORT pinN DEPARTMENTAL 598,645 406.663 645,645 .fY ATTORNEY 80,000 56.575 120.000 TOTAL CITY WIDE_ 678,645 463.238 765.645 OPERATING BUDGET 6,508,930 3.587.249 6.687.414 DEBT SERVICE 764,450 514,462 %84.450 ALL OTHER CIF'-GENERAL 216.700 242.907 261,700 CIP-OTHER 5_ __ _ 588,619 _ 475.473 5_623.214 TOTAL CIF' 5.805.319 718.380 5.884,914 CC 'iNGENCY/RESERVES ENERAL OPERATING -17,674 -17.674 192.335 GENERAL RESERVE 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.000 OTHER FUNDS 410.947 410.947 768,709 TOTAL CONTINGENCY --1_393.273 _ 1--9 -27- --1,961_044 "TOTALENDITURES $14,491.972 -$6,213,364 $13_-17-8_2 F i i 1 MEMORANDUM ! CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f TO: Library Board February 10, 1988 Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Library Director SUBJECT: Monthly Report, January 1988 S e WCCLS: The Budget Committee began its study of the proposed Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) budget for 1988-89.' There is a- projected. $332,685 deficit in the amount due to the public libraries. For Tigard this represents $39,283. There is a projected $239,000 carryover, which can be distributed over this first year, or two years (reflected above). Distribution over one year would reduce -Tigard's short-fall ,by $20,392. FY 1989-90 'wouldsee an even greater, deficit with no carry-over fundi The consensus recognizes the inefficiency of the current levy amount. One option is to go, for a larger, adequate serial levy in 1988 or•_89. The committee is also looking at reducing county-wide programs. The _Oregon Library Association (OLA) legislative committee is examining distract legislation that would create a_ library district funded by a tax base and allow for an appointed board. s, WILI: A committee is working to simplify the menu language on the E' is a concerted effort to get full public access computers. There f marc records for all the holdings. The backlog has been created j because more purchasing is being done by libraries than had been 4 expected. Most of this work will be sent to Library of Congress who charges 1¢ per record and is faster than current staff is i able to download records currently. Extra staffing was authorized to work on the authority control in both subject and author files. Some discrepancies in address location (in or out of city) is also being corrected. j Work Room Shelving and Work Stations: The installation date for the Spacesaver Shelving was moved from early January to early February. The plan for the work stations was submitted to the City Council on January 11 requesting that one-half the $14,000 cost be recognized from unanticipated WCCLS funds and the remainder from , increased collection of fines. The Council authorized expenditure of WCCLS funds only. The remainder will come out of the current FY operating budget, Volunteers_: Forty-five (45) volunteers gave 461 hours; 19 hours daily average. Four (4) community service assignees worked 131.50 hours; 5.5 hours daily average. Library Board gave 9 hours. January 1988 Monthly Report Page 2 February 10,- 1988` v Youth Services: Attendance at winter storytime`and toddler time has increased 34 percent over last year. To accommodate the number of requests for toddler time, the 'limit has been raised from 10 to 15 (15 children with adult) `in a year's time. A- series of puppet activities utilizing : the new puppet theater were presented January 13-16. An original puppet playwas performed for each storytime; three "do—it—yourself" puppet plays were conducted and a puppet-making ;workshop was given by a professional puppeteer, Sally 'Skelding. Pre-registration' was required and all programs were full`. Letter4 were sent to 20 teens who have expressed interest in forming a "oung'Adult Round Table. Work Indicators 1988 1987 1986 Adult Materials 10,403 8,320 6,671 Juvenile`Materials 6,034 5,594 -3,807 Total 16,437 13,914 10,478 Days of Service 22.5 23.5 22 Average Daily Circulation 731 592 476 Hours of Service 205.5 213; 204 Materials Circulation per Hour 80 65 51 . Increase/Decrease Circulation +18% +33% +5% Materials Added/Withdrawn 647/0 324/15 669/51 Borrowers Registered 443 645 314 Story Time (number of sessions) 293(12) 259(24) 86(6) Toddler Time (number of 'sessions) 95(12) 6(1) 29(2) Special Children's Program (number of sessions) 120(4) —0— —0— Personal Computer Users 135 N/A N/A i ht/3144D i _ f k i ' 4 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON February 16, 1.988 T0: Honorable Mayor, ,'ty Co cilnIM in inistrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: January 1988 Monthly Report Last month, I told you that the Police Department's monthly reports were generally narrative in nature, but that the monthly r•epor•t for•, December of 1987 would contain some statistics of interest. This month's report will be of a similar nature. In January 1988, 984 traffic citations were ssued� n citationsntoc�warr in January,1987, an increase of 2.96 percent, also changed from 373 cites to 269- warnings, to 984 cites to 919 warnings. Obviously, we are issuing warnings almost on a�for�le987 to 1 as Januwit�arytean DUII ` enforcement increased from 8 in January increase of 313 percent, Criminal arrests in January 1987 were 85, compared to '1.77 in January of 1988, an increase of 21.0 percent. Hours worked in January 1988 were 4,001.3, compared to 3,198.5 in January 1985, an increase of 125 percent. As you can see, productivity increased at a rate of 2:.3 times that of. hours worked. That tells us that productivity is more a result of increases in individual productivity than an increase in total. manpower-. During January the Micro Express lost '$100,000 in computer equipment in a and detective divisions, working together with the Portland burglary. Patrol police Bureau, made 3 arrests in the case, recovered the $100,000 of property and cleared a number of major, commercial burglaries throughout the state. The month of January started with the armed robbery of the Park Street Video. Patrol Division, acting on information from the victims and a citizen reporting suspicious activity, made an arrest within 1 hour of the robbery. A patrol officerobtained information about a suspect that she believed matched the description of the robber of Albertson's. That person has subsequently been identified and a warrant was issued for his arrest, Sergeant Martin and Corporal Johnson were named as co-employees of the month for their innovative supervision techniques to motivate their' troops. I would like to note that the supervisors of other shifts are now following suit- and their shifts productivity has increased markedly. The second night shift responded to a shots fired in a residence call and after resolving the situation without injuries, confiscated a 357 Magnum revolver, a .22 caliber rifle, a 12 gauge shotgun and a .223 caliber mini--14 rifle. This was the second incident with this subject in two years, The previous incident resulted in the confiscation of a .22 caliber rifle and at 12 gaugee rifle capable of semi aut gauge shotgun. . The mini-14 is a military type p- fire and using magazines holding up to 30 rounds, We've confiscated this type of weapon twice in the last 2 months in threatening circumstances. We are very concerned about what we see as a trend in unstable persons possessing this kind of fire power. i E Honorable Mayor, City Council and Administrator Page 2 j February 16, 1988 The Detective Division has made numerous felony arrests for crimes ranging from felony theft/fraud to armed rubbery. During the course of a fraud investigation a federal fugitive was identified and subsequently arrested. The number of theft, robbery and fraud casesgeneratedby Washington Square is having a major and serious impact on the Detective Division. These are felony cases needing commitment- to investigation and more time consuming. Case load is running ahead of population increases, primarily because of the impact of Washington Square. i The Crime Prevention Division held several Neighborhood Watch organization meetings in January. We are looking ,forward to the official startup of at least one group in February, The Support Services Division is short one t dispatcher due to a termination of a "probationary dispatcher. 'The division hopes to fill the position in early March after the establishment of a new eligibility list. Mrs. Carrick has received over $5,000 in alarm permit fees since revamping the program. We anticipate February to be as productive as January; ` ht/3221D P p f` i r t i t 1 4 f { f t t L MEMORANDUM CITY OF 1'IGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor- and City Council February 12, 1988 FROM: Robert W. Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Bull Mountain/Walnut Study Draft Final Attached is the Draft Final copy of the Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study for Receive and File by Council. on the Consent Agenda. This draft has been distributed to the people' and organizations on the attached` list for review and comment by the end of February. The final report will be available in March, '1988. lw/3169U C SEND OUT FOR REVIEW ,& COMMENT: Bev Froude, CPO Chair 12200 SW Bull Mountain Rd. 'Tigard OR 97224 Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3 Chaim 11800 SW Walnut St. Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. Russ Joki, Supt, Tigard School District 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard .Water District Attn: Mr. Bob Santee 8841 SW Commercial St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Hills Park & Roc District Attn: Mr. Howard Tertenning, General Manager 15707 SW Walker Rd Beaverton, OR 97006 Wash. Cnty, Rural FireProtection fist. #1 Attn: 'Mr. Jack Snook 20665 SW Blanton Aloha, OR 97007 Tualatin Rural Fire Protection Dist. Attn: Mr. Floyd Pittard, Chief -,PO Box 127 Tualatin, OR 97062 Honorable Larry Cole Mayor, City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 Mr. George Morgan City Administrator City of King City 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City, OR 97224 Commissioner Bonnie Hays, Chairperson Washington County Wash. County Admin, Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Commissioner Eva Killpack Washington County Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Commissioner Steve Larrance Washington County Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Commissioner John Meek Washington County Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 9712.4 FA 'Commissioner Roy G. Rogers Washington County Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Mr. Charles D. Cameron County Administrator Washington County Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Mr. Bruce Warner, Director Land Use and Transportation Washington County VA Wash. County Admin. Building No 150 N. First Ave. , Hillsboro, OR 97124 Mr. Kevin Martin, Senior Planner _Washington County Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Mr. Gary Krahmer, General Manager• Unified Sewerage Agency Wash. County Admin. Building 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 3215D 3 REQN DRAFT F I N A L For Review and Comment CITY OF TIGARD,`OREGON BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA URBAN SERVICES STUDY February, 1988 Prepared By City Administrator's Office: Robert W. Sean, City Administrator Ron Nagy and Chris Lin, Public Administration Graduate Studies Interns, Legis and Clark College 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 3 } CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON a BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA URBAN SERVICES STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I, EXECUTIVE_ SUMMARY • 1 o Findings. . . . . .. . . . 3 O Planning and Annexation Issues. . . . 3 o Conclusions... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 o Recommendations• • . . .-. • .. . . . . . . . . . . . . : . • . . .,• 5 o Annexation Comparative Cost/Household Summary• . . :. 7 o Study Data Sumnary• , . , . • . . . 8 o Comparative Capital Projects Resources. . . II. STUDY AREA g o Summary. . . . ,. 11. o_ Land Use and Development Patterns• 15 o NaturalFeatures. . . . . . . . • . . . o Transportation Network. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. • . . . 16 III. URBAN SERVICES 19 o Police. • • 21 o Road Maintenance. . 21 o Sewer. . 22 o Water. . . • . . . . . 22 o Fire Protection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 o Planning and Development Services. • . • • • • • • • • • • " " 25 o School Districts. . . . . . • . . . . . ' . . . . . 25 o Parks and Recreation• . . . 26 o Libraries. .. . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . . ,. . • . 26 o Street Lighting and Storm Drainage. IV, REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES27 oSummary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . .. 29 o - Revenue — Expenditure Break–Even Curve. . . . . . . . . . . . ..' 30 o Revenue -- Expenditure Break-Even by Area. , . . . . • . . 31 p Projected Net Operating Budget Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 32 o _ Capital Revenues. . . . . . V. APPENDIX, STATISTICAL TABLES AND MISCELLANEOUS. . . . . . . . .. . . . 35 �hV CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON a BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA URBAN SERVICES STUDY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 1987, following the decision by the South Metzger/Washington Square area to annex to Tigard, the City was contacted by developers in the Bull Mountain area about annexation. The City council discouraged an annexation N proposal at; that time, 'citing the City's lack of specific knowledge of the Councildirected the City area's needs and the City's capacity to -serve. , rvices Study of the Bull _Administrator's office to conduct an Urban Se Mountain/Walnut areas. FINDINGS (71 The basic data gathering was done by two Public Administration graduate students from Lewis & :Clark College during the summer of 1987. The final report was completed by the City, Administrator's office and released in February, 1988. The basic findings of the study are'. 1. DEVELOPMENT OF THE BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA IS OCCURRING AT A COMPARATIVELY RAPID RATE. o There are currently 855 households with 2,137 residents in the Study' area; - 86 households for about 23,700 residents, o The planned density allows 9,4 more than 10 times the current population; id ace with 607 o Development is proceeding at a comparatively rapid p housingunitsplatted- and, another 385 unitsin process, ,doubling the current population within 5 years; o The area contains approximately 2,045 acres zoned mostly at R-6 (6 units per acre); the area is largely undeveloped; o Traffic density on Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street will increase at 20 percent per year each year for the next five years and then faster each year after that until reaching planned densities around the year 2010; o Sewer and water service either exists or is reasonably available with development; o Fire protection is provided by the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District and can serve projected development; o Parks funding is nonexistent, recreation services ar-e available to a very limited extent through the facilities of the Tigard School Dist. ; o Storm Drainage services are minimal. 2. THE COUNTY'S ABILITY TO SERVE THE AREA IS RELATIVELY LIMITED. o Planning services are limited to case-by-case plan review at the time of application, with little staff time available for long-range planning; o Police services are provided by the Sheriff's Office through a county special district levy of 85¢ per thousand providing one officer per 1,000 citizens; o County services available at County Courthouse, Hillsboro, 25 minutes; 1 11110 Iggil NINE=! o Local road maintenance by the county is riot pr•esentlyi*available, but may be funded by a county local road maintenance district special levy of $60 per year, per,household; ~ o Major street improvements are through the County Transportation but Improvement Fee (TIF -fees) fu eligible et mayr� n oto be e development, I for much Bull Mountain Road and Walnut significant allocation of lIF Fees; o The County does riot currently provide for storm drainage month per the area, although a County Storm Drainage District and a $2 per household fee is under study; b Parks and Recreation services are available through annexation to the TualatinHillsParks and Recreation District ($1.47/1,000 tax rate in Fiscal Year 1987-88); o Street lighting is available through County Lighting Districts averaging $4-$5 per month, 'per, household. 3. THE CITY CAN PROVIDE HIGHER -LEVELS OF NEEDED SERVICES To THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION AT A COST,COMPARABLE TO OR EVEN LESS THAN COUNTY CHARGES. A. o Residents outside city limits pay.. but "abandon" about $55 per person, Y per year by, riot being in a city. Joining a city entitles them to their share of cigarette, liquor., franchise fees and other- revenuesata 37 no additional cost, totalling more than $117,000 per year (55$117,535) to the area. t, o City taxes and fees compared with County and Special Service District fees are as follows per year for a $100,000 assessed value home: Service County/Dist rict City Police -$85 (@ 85¢/thousand) $200 included in City tax rate Street Maintenance $60 (@ $60/year) estimated at $2'per• 1,000 ($2.03 actual in 1987-88) Street,Lights $60 (@ 4-5/month): Parks & Recreation $147 (@ $1.47/thousand) Storm Drainage $24 (@ 2/month) $ 18�@ $1 50/month). . . Annual Cost $376 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard o Revenues from the area would exceed current City direct costs of service, making excess net revenues available for needed capital investments in the Bull Mountain/Walnut areas o City services available at the Tigard Civic Center, 5 minutes; O City Police services are 1/3 greater at 1 Officer per 750 residents compared to the Sheriff's levy at 1 Deputy per 1,000; o Annexation includes long—range land use planning and public Facility programming services from the City at no additional cost; o Library services are assured to City residents, but available to those outside the City Only as long as the WCCLS levy continues; o City Systems Development Charges (SDC's) collected from development are targeted by the City back into the areas where the development occurred. Improvements to Bull Mountain Road are estimated to cost $3-5 milliOn and Walnut about $2-3 million. City SDCs from area development could raise most of that amount (8,600 units X $600 current SDC fee = $5,160,000). . The County has no Parks funding mechanism. Development of the area in the City would generate $2,150,000 ($250 SDC x 8,600 units $2,150,000) for Park land acquisition, g Y preservation, bikeways and other Park improvements; Bolcom PLANNING AND ANNEXATION ISSUES Growth and development is occurring under current Comprehensive Plans with or without the adequate Public Facility Plans. The City of Tigard is currently developing its Public Facilities Plans .for Streets, Sewers and Storm Drainage systems, The City has offered to work with the CPO to jointly develop the needed facility plans For the CPO area, as the City does in the NPO areas. The,City realizes that the issues of planning and annexation ,are separate, but related topics. While annexation is an option for obtaining, needed planning and other urban services, the City prei-ers to leave that choice to individual property owners and residents. Believing that Bull"Mountain/Walnut areas will eventually choose to annex -- whether in 1 years, 5 years, or 10 years - the City is, therefore, genuinely just as concerned as are current residents that the area be developed in a logical and livable manner. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the land use and annexation issues affecting the area are separate, but related. Development ,is occurring under current comprehensive plans in the Buil Mountain/Walnut area with or without annexation to the City. Needed levels of urban services either are not available through the County, or are available more conveniently and less expensively for comparable services from the City of Tigard upon annexation. Needed street improvements, like Bull_ Mountain Road and; Walnut Street, are unlikely in the foreseeable future without annexation. Since annexation allows a one-time multiplier amount to be added to the City's tax base (annexing area assessed valued X City tax base rate = $ added to tax base), it is 'potentially to the City's financial advantage to consider annexation of the area after it is fully developed. But tax base considerations are just part of the-analysis - - Annexation of the area sooner•, rather, than later•, offers the following advantages for the affected neighborhoods as well as the City: o "Abandoned" revenues at $55 per capita bring in $117,535 the first year and over $1 million extra the first 6 years at no extra costs per household; o City service costs city-wide become even more efficient following annexation of the Bull Mountain/Walnut area, further reducing City tax rate costs for all properties an estimated 5-10 percent below authorized levels; o City services are higher and costs are lower than County Service Districts for comparable services; o City long-range land use and public facility planning could help guide development to a more desirable outcome under current Comprehensive Plan provisions; o City Systems Development Charges cannot be collected and targeted until annexation, Meanwhile, County TIF fees are being collected from the area but allocated county-wide, riot targeted to needed improvements like Bull Mountain Road and Walnut Street. It: appears that the total Bull Mountain/Walnut area may eventually choose to annex to Tigard. If- annexation happens somewhat later, that works somewhat to Tigard's short-term financial advantage. Meanwhile, each year• without annexation means the loss of TIF revenues out of the area, continued loss of abandoned. revenues, and the continued lack of long-range Public: Facilities Plans coordinated with the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, driving up both the community's and the City's long--range costs. 3 !il RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings and conclusions of the Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study, the 'following is recommended: 1. That, annexation proposals from the Walnut and Stull Mountain II/North Central ureas be supported by ,the City and required before allowing connection directly or indirectly through City sewer lines; 2. That, annexation proposals from the Bull Mountain I/Southeast and Bull Mountain II/South Central areas be supported and encouraged by the City; 3. That, annexation requests from Bull _ Mountain III/Northwest areas be discouraged until annexation of the Walnut and Bull Mountain I-II areas are substantially completed and adequately served; fk 4. That, consistent with the first two recommendations, as much choice as to ¢ timing and logical annexation unitsbe left to individual property owners and residents, and therefore, that temporarily irregular boundaries and piecemeal -annexations be allowed, viewing the entire Study Area as the eventual logical boundary., Creation of islands or the inclusion of some minority parcels should also be given consideration by Council when more logical` service delivery would result. All lawful annexation methods should be left 'available to individuals- and property owners, including an annexation'election of all or major parts of the Study area. 5. That, prior to annexation, the City attempt to offer and ,provide as much Public Facility Planning 'arid long-range planning coordination service as possible consistent with County and CPO desires. The better the 'plan coordination, the less urgent is the pressure on the City and the area for immediate annexation. mh/0026a 4 F } Revised 2/12/88 E BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREAS ANNEXATION OPTIONS SUMMARY r WHAT ANNEXATION CHANGES? g r I E AFTER ANNEXATION SERVICE CURRENT ICE o Was County Sheriff. . . o City of Tigard Police POL o 1 officer per 750 residents. . s 0 1 officer per 1000 residents 1/3 more Police Service than with Special District at 85¢ from Special District. r per thousand special levy. . . o Emergency responses around o Emergency Responses average b minutes with Special District. . . under,3 to'5 minutes. . . o Records/Reports located at o Records/Reports located at Tigard Civic Center. . . Hillsboro. . . o ; School Resource officer^ { 3 Programs. . i l o Cit 'of Tigard takes over payments . e Street Light STREET o Washington County Street of existing g LIGHTS Lighting Districts. . . - o 4-5 Month, $60/year average Districts. . • o. Paid by City from Street funds. . . o City of Tigard. .. STREETS o Washington County.. . o All major road improvements are o All major road improvements ' are 'through LID. . . through LID... o No local street maintenance now O City from maintains.lo alfsstreets ' or form local street district at $60 per year extra. . o Development SDC fees dedicated _ oinside the City area._..' Development TIF fees go outside the area County—wide. . . SEWER BILL o U.S.A. rates. . . o U.S.A. rates. . .it f Tigard bills monthly o C O Unified Sewerage Agency bills City of U.S.A. contract. . . annually on property taxes. . . p er STORM o Currently no County service, o City of Tigard Storm Drainage DRAINAGE proposed at $2/month. . . utility at $1.50/month. . . o City of Tigard PLANNING, o Washington County Dept. of . BUILDING & Land Use & Transportation. . . o Community Development Department at Tigard City Center. . . ENGINEERING o Hillsboro offices o City adopts CPO Plan... o CPO Plan. . . o Full City Planning and Engineering o Limited long—range planning• • Services. . . LIBRARY o WCCLS Library System only if o Tigard Library open to City Tax Levy continues. . . residents even without WCCLS tax. . . GENERAL o Washington County Commission allTigalocallyrd relectedty Council, with one local Commissioner. o Tigard Civic Center. .. o Hillsboro Courthouse. . . S WHAT ANNEXATION DOESN'T CHANGE SERVICE CURRENT AFTER<ANNEXATION FIRE o Tualatin Rural Fire Prot. Dist. o No Change, stays the same WATER o Tigard Water District o No Change, stays the same SCHOOLS o Tigard School'District o No Change, stays the same PHONES o GTE or PNB o No Change, stays the same POST OFFICE o Same addresses and zip codes o No Change, stays the same, COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICTS OR ANNEXATION? Under the County 2000 Plan, countywide services are to be paid from countywide funds; local services must either come from County Special Service Districts or annexation to the City. Annexing to the City provides more service at a lower cost than buying those same services from County Service Districts. For similar services on a $100,000 assessed valuehomein 1988-89 the differences in the Bull Mountain or Walnut areas would be: Service County/District City Police $85 (@ 85¢/thousand) $200 included in City tax rate Street Maintenance $60` (@ $60/year) estimated at $2 per 1,000 Street lights $60 (@ 4-5/month) ($2.03 actual in 1987-88) Parks & Recreation $147 (@ $1.47/thousand) _ Storm Drainage $24 (@ $2/month) $ 18'"(@ $1.50/month), _ Annual Cost $376 Bull Mtn/Walnut $218 Tigard _6 111!1 vill"11 1 I � I i ; 1 1 mffmdm Oe M10av vNM CO 01 a: by M.+ ch MOO NwO �DOs.MN a,co w0 w .+C O N tD M m P m OO 000 b.IM r,C-4 a N NP mvP.rMM MOt0 mem OOIONNO '000 W h0 taMd OmP O aIm Mm10 0--ma+to mMPr,Nm �OvO C.Om ,a.~. O.r Ln 10 N inaM N. 0) C �0. . PMN N gONC 0. MC 0 co M. 0 LON tom co at mO mmM C 10MC C O t0aP CNN PO In NON P(D Ln e+M P :.P C PmM N. Ln C-4•0 d Ph m ti d Ia a.P O�.d m'01 m 1aMa N P N In m mT m'r1 m mON ei 000+ 4... ..I N C m 0 N -r c-4 r NO.N m C C O M P.M rI M N r1 O .+. N N N N m P M N M N..1 N N 0 v L r6. a N asL b m.�mC d M m to mOM m.yN m dC htT P mN� "0 POm N a N.-I mOmP MaI d0,CM d m00 h M NMat•a .+CO atN�D N 0,m N P of r, 61... N O M M rn CN P M.+ ONIn Mm10 OIn N Pay m O•+m M m tO O 'MM.-i t0 .-i q d M �'^ .P-tnK O ..I111nP m p a M.. a, d m.. d d 10 m c, a+.h dq > .'0 N.. Y d \ 10 01 N CM.-� M cc at MC d CM Ln d'M m6+P m Nb �m O mN tO rIC N PNM a1MMm N.-+ O.t C 00"n dtd C,0, W bOb MN.�i M 1mCC mm0Omh CNX1 CmM hd G m.-INSD tD O 1O M �'+ N dP h 10 fir-W < MM m d N P.MN m N.� Q ��10 �.. M .NH X OID w Ch 10 10 ItM C a , tDNwa+vM OmOOMM OMP N'0�0 cat PNO Lf) .-INaI C '0 mNP'0•+ PN m d Q a1M Pd M . . .. . • •m% ., Ili hP m Nn0 m ~IN40 n Y M N in 0 m I r I O M ti P N.a Om ti m M10 a rn CCL m ,; O mi N U') m m 0. m \ m �.....' 9 O t ol d a p O M P C O d O m 0 a I M C', Q m M �D a)P O a t P N N O O O M P d P tOn mm in MC-atC M OAC P hat NN M Pmm m m atMd .-I. W - Nmo.d O+ NtiC b C%'oN N athN O Nm O B. co .y M N m m CD rl: 10 .y O m V t\ ON m m N a m d N H ¢ T L E 3 d d d j a 7 '¢aa sSxn-1.30.HB Ca3l a C OCC? re O d V V+ .y O a 0 - . "N.� 0 a a'O ada Y aaa OYa Yi aCtYd an >d 1.aOC 1Y3 W3, d w 0 t8 n n a n.0 r6 a n d acGd>d 0 . c c K 0 accC d � w 0 a a a wl dn O aa a > YdQ Y dxr0o » Ka 0X0a0 o i Heo Qx o o 0 W d Oo H0C J<N ¢ /L 0:w0 aKW 3 . EO 000 0 ,O �^ 00 m O O Ci Cr 0 O N N, ao 00 00 b00 b .¢U. (6 41 (y t/f N N O� y Y.H bi Mt O >'o 0 00 00 6 d joc, ]oa, C'nnrn�l dY n'f O�011 N ra N < 1 F u> N 0 ti Y B H O 0 O O N Y a mM ro 3 _.. 40 4A ri Go �v 0 � Y d 3 C m 0.-0. O d d O O0i INN 0.- C, Q . 4ft m O 000 %O 008 0 , 0 co 0 40 40 0 d L T _ 41 co 0 000 000000 d0 d O p, 0 mN N co C-4 al 4A !Nco T y c O m a C M C EL+ m 0 000 d O C O 0 0 0 d y j m co N N (�„ T d a N-- d C o co lj� 40 3 rd O h d L co 0 O m LL O+ d 7 .� N m Y d d 40 Y C� C N 00 _ O d a E O y G. L d al . O d .N O d O 7 d 091 CL m V 7 m Y LL LSV td TU L .r6 pU CY rb .Y d dd m: O.m 0 N V E d lz � n p3 41 caE �+ o� L Y ••.�L 0. ..d.N L > L T L O L W d .0 E O C L d Y .Y..0 cn m O ad,C U a 7 U.o:N U 0 3 I BULL MOUNTATNNALNUT STUDY C , TI. STUDY AREA j i The Bull Mountain/Walnut study area consists of approximately 2,045 acresof unincorporated Washington County located due west of the current limits of the city of Tigard. The area's northern boundary follows Old Scholls Ferry Road [ i' and the southern boundary follows Beef Bend Road to SW 150th Avenue. The Urban Growth Boundary marks the western limit of the study area. { 9 The study area contains 855 households with an approximate population of j E 2,150 persons. The current assessed value of property and residences totals $97,184,500. This figure reflects only those properties ,appearing,on the tax rolls as of February 1987, and does not include any reassessments or newly subdivided pr•oper•ties. Because of the rapid residential development now occurring in the Bull Mountain area it is riot possible to determine the-true � r assessed value of the study area from the standard sources. A reappraisal is currently being conducted by the Washington County Assessor and, applying a formula recommended by the Assessor's Office, the revenue estimates in this report are an attempt to show both the true present value of developable land as well as the present value of under—assessed property. The Assessor's Office expects to complete their appraisal by October• 1987. f 9 C)2--'2 2-g$ Anpr& 71 y 3 I �rl��`�III�111 Illlryr rl��ll oir�rll II11111 VIII(! TjT�lj frj1 if l[T fT 111 INOTE IF THISI lit 1(�iJ IYI .II tOr III I 1 1 r r r.l-! 11� 111 yl 1 1 1(r 7 1 111 til 111 rp o;!F!1 - I J i '�' 1 r � �l l. �j � � f , MED DRAWINGTHIIS SSS CLEAR MICROFTHA Aw _ I 2 3 4 _ _ 5 6 12 TFE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - - DRAWING. _ a 0t£ 62 BZ 12 82 SZ 42 £2 Z2 i2 02 6t @I [I - 91 S�` b! £1 21 !I OI 6 B L __9.- S .._-6 - 6-. ._Z 111 iMllllll�llllillll�lllliltllilCH�111�U1h!( I _ ._ _ 1 1 I -- "ARCH r i _ 1990 � F pow INN mm R �• �� ',, �� x '` of - .®dxpyo ♦ice � 6+..►..n .� '�`' �' . X000�i�.cc;►i •: >....... � `s..a►a►.• iay�y��i�i�i i i�i�� i i��i 1� yi•W-aW��i♦ or p . ' ■ iF.;35 ��i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i i�i�►�i�i�i�i�i�i}'i�i-v ' t , ♦.a►..1..1.a►a..►a.a►♦�.♦a.a►.a►.1.1..a►.w.•►►s031 �� _ •• _ ♦a►1.a►MMA .a►..a►a►a►..a►....=►tea►a►a►. � 0J��J00�-"�►i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�a�i�i�i�i�►aQi�i Vii' '_� �� ` '�'�; x - � „ '��i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i►i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�c� ,►� �O��O�+OO��i�i�.►�O�i�00�00�i�i� •-rl t—^�i�i��`� gs�� i Oi�i�i�i�i�i�.moi►i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i� :��s r�:�yy+tmt �°' ►iO�O��i00�O��i0000�O.pp��a►�a, • -oma � et'�, - .►aiiiia►iiii�i'!►.ii�iii�� , ., s t. '-� � � k� _ ♦IVB►a►,*a�t l7�Jf,�1�►�.�►�.�a►�.%►.��.�.�a►�.�.�.�.�a►�� .y.r. � ., _ 1 -.:'-�tii 5 i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i�i►i�i�i�iri� i i�i�i� �!i�i�i�i a> _ _ ♦a►a.a.�a.a►a.a►a►.►a►a►.a►a►a..;. IR. ♦...F.. � ' ._ems � � .' ♦..a.a►..a.a.a►.►.a►.�.a EMu•a►a►.sa.a►��V.��a►a►a►.a►r- ►V�a►...a.a►a.a►a..a►a►a.a►...a►a►a►.►• � T�, 1`. _C�)►.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.��a►�a►�.�1�.�a►�.�a►�a►4J^ cif 7.�5� •i` ►a►a►a►a►a►a.a►a►a►.a►a•� ,I, I. , .: rt':JI IllII..•:.ff.11�i.:ilr i.ii r !,��rr i.,.; ..:�....,1. I !I i. 3':,i Y' tiv Np .p be .c, aa, x re 1 �-a • I xc>a��b c# '�''�"<x °� a<�'>>C - ra ,��r��ad��a>��5�&h�g$.. ��, � gg�■',�Q Y�.S S:O� �Ot��S'Q�u•P�.o"!ab�.�rgS��s,+O'y��.o�,�<>�T.9•ysD. of N1 A&•� A oP A. 9 �'N w`4 iP Q'+4:pa".1p°><<"'(`��`� ' ■T �`D te'o >+ s mo 4 DQ oX .�5 84n�V kayY°�gpi8"q» r X8;8.. Sd�SX _ r•8 .+.'.P D<a..p &©. ., .tee .. � -.. , � �}'�Pa<>�'�br_1>a,N Y�&�?,y. $4>:Y R �8 ',0��@+'I`'+P( .�_Y Zt,L�`6"•�bi+D�' VSab�Qe'.. 1 W R Y}.YgQg �.,yw)o#Qr'm��°�;m^ap`k>�Y d�sb�Eo'�Sab.a-o+d`• OliPt.9,b+bs�96ii,Q'Q'D�Q`+P.P+b'3GdR"•4'g4Y�.AQ" e^.o Y+?4 4c e�" ® i 6-s> 6c a.„o..m s. .o. •K�« b,Y a a p > )°:8 s>Qc';gQ`.b6t.erA':" v ro m ,•>•sgg- -.®®,y,g�A QS &<> o.)D Q�.g b a<s.w m�sd�.R 8,®�545,k'0>«R'(�9,a9<4u`p�4 '+e®Y'�_4 b:ag•G 3C)"Q>}t+�+p. E'D ti� ��4 d) .,�8� a, _-_ `5Q�9� � T ' � $ F >� �,,To..A4y a� 4 5yv6C a r t.1-aa ° d=ieg by a a +.aJo-w- � P a -"I Q" +D [r s >Q>.�o);.'"Q,Q� �c��aM >��,y`eSY"S1`% yv'�'�• ■ R.� b'3�QD44�t9wK�?4S`9-d��v4QSp;�Q°a?a aa"'�oA 4+B�c7'w)`yr Y83i+P'b'S ab yG�,tp �eX'aA f, rF�,.,s.�q:�f'•,��'e .3,�>'�<s 1 � �-»�.�,.�a'�°a#.Q.�®,y�ac�ay�;a.•'Aa^'dw<Da"� -�e eo'q'' (es(�k Oil >YSoloRp+asb`'1f' a , ani �F�.+Y�8 75R6RR18�>>aR —�I . :$.'Qa:.`�9.,�w�'aRma,�•a�"w'Y�e�£�'4%'�3i $a �bR�a« a��■_—E;�� y� In3irM -4'3'6!' If ooh r <r+ r MINE MR MR Kann off 1 ■ ■1 #<�f oaa* il ' ' �,! 1!�� `►•e�(, 'Fil— AIN bil--�_��` ,��.��1�11�� -��1�• aiiix iij '^stye eF"' t': �• , ' �., :e2 Sia t{' epee' 1 v et eta CIe e3 mTlmr7mrrm m ' - • 1 r 1 1 1' 1 1 / •...,.• L,....,:.:.! ,y .,un c tfe ,.nuo uv❑h.nmbFn,�. u y ' 1 ' n�*_1 A6�9y}'!�a�'0aaDS 4.'�.6•Se D�',°;1dCDw. ,044 s 'P¢pd'•PO.�.A�-0'D<pdD.Pn.,y'Fyw ��P�`T°j�. p0'•4S.t x�aa�{ �� 4+bA �Jt R ra .T•4 + k 008 Y 8�0•'�b T+S•b aR. y Nim iF pia; k'YV_fY.�9�nb�i'a+i8bw6d - • 'w•T4>6d >* :v.. -o... ss.•< w.g �TyP-O-JF�-�•f.::c..�Y�l%l•+ld+trQ,{o i. . ®?. .. .-. e-9 d>v9b IS d<eD .Y 9•a+R y�iriS�Y'B e °¢O,P•Pd„bw�°+P'b'd>��'PI�']b'.R'�T.n.. 34d j Pmiia<#I®b fie ®�S &�a>�g�Y25#yw�d A+aa��iPmgb gy�0'r51-;!nn�b4H¢,3�w<`f 4r ASV L7 .>4<� da'�P¢Sw•,e ?..iy.,cvywtp4,y{%0ww 19•0ga'-0`.. ■ �■ ®w:a;�oa 'i >q_,��ywa O>aP b ®�S"Js;'ea ba..b..a a•e<jY`„w'b,,;-4l+F a¢ON 'p.y-. GR4 t 1 E PQ;a..wo'1.q#.a1�b�d+eD<GiP.:gh'ae>d"•% ,a'a,�gba�D®,H+P.B'b.�A'�k%aiei2g'Eeb�<> a�•�'�`C°y�g'>H'G 4N�aO'+?I9�dd:°,b°�:.. 1 de,@,y^D®4,ydr of Qo+P.a- 6•vnD•i��b w 4 . bb,�Q��wd•8w'•s®wwww<44P d�r'.69�a"'roDa;..:lya�®R>+dQaO�s.,C0PP"'•y9$g•�9'.a9,.'gm��'&a�P'P¢g$a..y°>w.',4op7wwaoeaQay,�r.t:�•.��9V-b,'`¢baPae-fa#4aB ®Fae'�•wya0'..Kp QBF�'-�:yak��!:'��'¢ ?s•6 ai •a x. r Q d rae ae+ �H••so.�:� - � �.#&+bWQO+�a+Pw•3,�Aj,<tQ>.4�P0?4�w�<P�4%a&'�nDnP-0O-0`'TW iq• "1e¢ag'4>e4 K��d�*H N A6'p 3+':�4Si - ■ ((jj M w CI�`+D`��4ww`Q�¢'Q'�Y"'�P<�4�4 6;9"{7`S.•QO?+fd��0�.Sd Y w�O�4roP ApQ' ��il a d.QD P iY w 4�nb•6r#a R.#®.{.P a+..:... 0 4¢'f� •dL r�•,�w®ayd;•Ye.<r�a ew,P°�o¢�'°.snP a .�»•x�•.:�'�,�:-.s� r. Y •a as'Fs{l`i aS3�y�'�'io• s nD 4.b•.w�+4`b w_4'e+_9.d'WC°�'9iY ooee.aa-•0.�r•.?D k T'3>wd�'��U¢'F e".b;+Rai °��4,Sp' 7 g�'+6��,q9'�DYQ'�{�°.g6'g®R#^P06gb.4�D`�C�"t�iY�w'p"?P°PQY48��Y°PQ09`•9. +rww4'PO 6�a dC�'6t�N' 4 4-w#e+y.,p.cBa.+P�Y�wd`<P�'Qw'4•@'baDWQa4,g�' M.�'�i`6 fr�0..%&f;Spe;'0��' 9�4aw�•,0°T<A�&�'4°S 4•K`•S>#0+P,b w•P P+( i J �'0�C.T�S® ag;'FR �� oP�'p'q,g^ayerrr>�9Y®#J�9 SR6Rff�u:� �� ■ #nP¢4�K'>wB'+m4,adc•d aC S acz..sa ��1 jaaam.,p,.9„aad,6�'O0•Y moi`-'t'£0;� J3a 'd�R�w'°c• � � I_-■'�� ' � 6?>>w�kd oto°+! .. ='� -� ■■ ■ a 4a.T4�"Qgq T.r}eR i�w� yaf #� S f t�■�e�� - �■■ [■1�E�� son p'°sP'�q'�'�„rye�e•'��a'a��" -° �� V� ■j� �� f � � ■�1■■■1 ■.. ,,.,a`'��w�4T�e zsk''ae�`.°"r,,,ao. 99 IN♦ -■■lE■■►� i a�� a �� ,�i■■ �a r.�T Q A« g _ � ttRt■t��1':t��. ■ � L r e J e! at av>a y, •.9e 1 5pik4 t 4+ y r Ji�p�.1v�JjtF.z : iii �x .`ed 40 �+>4 p•Po z.� WN, li%'�.;nom, - 99mp � •' - '•Ilit�S1. RRR6��8aa666 �t J FJ o'�4M Nia) ;2i;o; s. Fis z: DSS'` I gi &, 4m;ri ,,0�'FeS4"98E{a}g¢,�8a�dtd&#'kg RBkB'vvV.8&ddd�S i+ 8'r.�..° � � a 8 ias+• •E88 oda �' � �■ 69f"a� 'q`.ae R4 ' # 4t3 a sus+ea��§��#a- s'dg� { .SBeF¢ �. 8tde�s�aiz rtr'"rgoaS&:S<ei�Dedd@FSiib{'. . ' ` 145'9 aL Awl � tc,3gd'9�f¢`�¢!¢ sg9 �� x°86 8Bg83 r 99fig�DPa3'k ' "\ F:dEd4<�kk>d° Of,M- 0 -a:DBaa a'S;tiaa,�+d@ Baisy{.�,,:g•,83g'8d.8�3�d'{d�'Baghg�agABx A�gq)Ph>PP.88Sz! as°81d� aa ''i SSb4S9:pfag saatt4e t>°fk �FBgd3Aeak83'8� =b Dg�sBtSaaa�g;E+dd'k iStSfidkRRS zta9o4�39i99svaao8,n,43g3s„�ssd'+r A6 8r#4�d�dd��•F4'S$t>sFP� �' � SE 3Asss.,...eye 8t}}s,,Ss Atte•�.dP,d'd'454,4:'b?6°D`F`R°R°3`B`B°g96�4 E -� ii�,$oa8 gAgeg#�+y� ?E�9f8d848gdgtr4d�r3tgNg�BgSgS°S°8°saa ass0�V?84� g8��xyg4o qqs F iF3,asro 53 D>�f ga�s¢ sa e �F88888E'dgk¢dgdgdg�g�dSd4dSd8t �4f$g4g4aogFis�q!vk��4 3Q4Y40gp"� ko-E sps i s {4d49kg48d288:8d4g,ggddddk44495+ #$s 4 8414th Fs g8C 88884.sr4gE'ddddd'4gk�4 i i�°ia4�4o-£o-4o-E a 3vpQ'�sSdd,ss'3>' m•a ■ �„ kdSdSd484vi+dg i�8SS48a8.a.s�9gg8ddE 3#.-`v v v8 � _ - //� a �ka',k;d Pggk@48asi�ffa9SSS8x Lgd6e<t,}b?b?�'��494a a e+,��" 9?,f °g'Fg88+23�3�k1#di'd�Q+S8S68�'gg44oa d'a4i4,s 9 � $c ■ 43'�gQ84.S.8i#sgsg�gaa�a�a+a4ak4S4b�4aersA ++or+>a 4+,41` ¢sg'i�'�3a fgddddd SS4S4 ri8'dgA�d.3d f##5S sa a+ �a Q t 44�'49gbg4�,�9as3Yh'sa44ggBd544fi§ise9ar"4v �esg i rs,ow�„ia ?8g@g48SS888Sa¢3a�¢sk48Aa dd eF k 4 44�i�aggg g8gxz,'°FSS° '� .Sk.:d�d6i�,4,,S,k.s.,d,3�'a��gdg�d�d�d484444,4k44$g'A��'r,,44��^�'��n'P •�z�k , �. 3@W8tsg'rg�w' s 9 ga s�flB xb�w S4Saaaq '� S4SSaS 4 _ �a 8 >dddd4S4i�a'faro g� -- 88ddddd iv. �� A'fA�X35� Zio. 8 3c i �qeq<pP sr ,`�,�stsao-�R2 ��'1,�� ♦'•� �� R i■I�—I ��. s 3��a? X94 t s a a t� ■� � E.. EC! z<a48S8 s{� Sagags�£4sr 6d mom � !, E � � .� �1!■�� Pxg AC-0 dS£aA sba;aa9 _ �NINE s3 gd4F>4Euskko:vYv !�� a� � �� ■1 �. FkS, 4 s8r'DdidRk+r°A9F ��1l�■■►�� ' ^G� ,.>t■■1 ■ OWNX4445#. �>F £$�3a�i �� ... L � 111 �_ ■eil PON 9 19 MINI •.. . - lolliii. p7 j�i � ��k aq” " s'`o” �.o'�' -r-N-1i�iN 0-0 ON. ':�-�r`�•Him •� moi♦ 1�.• . +' `° je�► r�:---•'-7.c Ztra�t�a��w � J�' a��s.ct 3. a �,q�6 .7a loll miuusm Eli uujiuuuiuuuui '4111L 3�4 • • l .. JFAJ ! , THE CITY OF TIGARD FIGURE 4-3 AND VICINITY PROPOSED TIGARD 1 PARK SYSTEM I ; Seo -EXISTING CITY PARKS PROPOSED AREAS FOR PARK LAND ACQUISITION -SCHOOLS '8 E-Elementary J-Junior High H-High School f� _ SM `� ••••••• EXISTC N PAPS s . d - i PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN/ 0 ; _i 11 i �: BICYCLE PATHS -- _ ® ® 0 PROPOSED EQUESTRIAN TRAILS ® SA M ♦ ®r 9� t 6 l • l: 1 .. -e,�� ,..-.,fir ,.,<_ _ �.,•; . NOTE: t E: IF THIS MICROFIIMEO 3 4 5 s- 7 t r t t t t t t t t t r t t'�►t �.._. DRAWING r + I I 1 � I + i i + f � t [ i � 1 ► i � + + DT �� - _.--'-._..1 2 __. _ - 8 8 J O LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT I5 DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. "-='- JL oe 6z ez a ez Gz 1,z ez za tz oz sr ei—ti - si sr bi ei`"z�- - i -o s a s -Ms b s z t atttualNtt�tatiun6wtxy�ud tu��nl�t .I""'"--i�--.--',�'•.�:! ... .I t t�tat.,•d�sr!Ntt�rutl:...t. .. t....l t i I.�,h..tlt�xNhNdetdtndaelwdnuhtdtRtLxdtwhRtltet th tlutdmtlun�tuthat�NHllili�ilip�itt ; f ARCH , 1990 x K.•. � — —,a1Lz�G�_zE ,,,, IMMMAKA "m AWSaamOL JIK SYSTEIF +...c TaiiGC:1GG�AL S7SiF]II z•. � _ F1c 3`Li$tGiIEE�Mat iTSiEii ,`' �----� •— r x Y 1. Piilll� ... �q,� 1- ten t (Cpri\�+' ..,..9 I � 1 ,....1E IN I - i 11 iFi IIIf1111111111TtT17111 11 II 11111111 � � � � `•�� - '_ �1 I t 1 1 1 t.as I. 1. I t l t o mrr� rti .,..�._.—..._._._ :.,_•__•_ :,:. .,.-..�-�. Y I I I- 1 I I ( I. I I J-.IT"A"',�iml L.PI_ 1'ln I 1 1 I.�11 n'I�111 1 rtl 111 111 Itl II141111111 PIgiI1111i 111gg11111 t1111111Ig1u11111� - _ ::�` ,..^..ri; NOTE: IF TNISMICWCLEFIUEO - 2 3 4 _ $ 6 ] B B 1t O SS AR MMINOTIiQ.EIT IS OOE 10 i.it TE QUALITY OF TE MIGOtAL J.J 16,6111.,hu, DWIW -_ _ ,IOE 82 BE 22 92 S2Yt E2 R IZ 02 6t 91LI- 91 Lf1.1 -CI_ tI- -II 01-6 --Y (--9 --y Y--- E y { •,, +IIGm6ndunLudnuGwlllMluutilpl, -- ��1990 I 4 /IICr 3LwARC+'SAC* cm 6 i 3E Eii77a.6QC11� b ac x s a»k �r-ecgr �=.ar -woar. w r B -- >tiEy6 TE�+w-iSJob,, t+cadr,alrE S:.nasE Z1.T. all r -r 220 'c IBNR<< �orrT.fa ettarfat sa spa Ifu�reee rr� 1 _ t scar as L.0" x ' R f - -- -- Y - L � L• ' —= 1` g routes ---»Routes ogrammed or under construction I REGIONAL ----Proposed routes(no funds BICYCLE identified) ___ Corridors(specific routes to be T___ j UJ N ®Rlt determined) j August 1983 j. ISO 01.119011-ml .I F 11 111 1Jill 11 I 1 101E: l - 1 f i.. l i.. 1. i�lnlj i P.f 1?t9�1.1!_jl f tf ITITT�IIIIpmN11IIf1111111I11T il�lillg4t(r V14'flp11p11lllllligrpptry111 '._- - TMM MIMFI E 2 3 4 _ 5 8 7 8 8 O II .... 1 OfV/Yw IG IEGG CIE TX,W THIS NGTI(Z,n Is W ITV pF TIE - OE 82 BZ 2 BZ SZ ►2--Ey R 12 OZ BI BI CI_.9t_..-Sr -YI .B�.—Z1_ .;�__Ot-8_.8.. t__9S._..f.-._E 2 la-- �_ .. •�MIGIIIIIIitlllllutlllll � _ b MARCH 1 i Land Use and Development Patterns 4 Zoning in the study area is about 85 percent R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre) with a small amount of R-15 in the extreme northwestern corner and at the .location of the Foxglove subdivision on Beef Bend Road near 150th Avenue. Other exceptions include an R-5designation for the Hawk Ridge development on i 150th Avenue and an R-3 designation for- the Mountaingate subdivision in the Street- of Dreams area. There is no commercial or industrial land in the study area. To better describe the development patterns in the study area, we have divided it into four' subareas (see map 2). Development is most prominent in the Bull Mountain II subarea, whichcontains the Mountaingate subdivision, Phases I-IV, s Foxglove Phases I' and II, Sonoma Hills, Bull Mountain Park #3, and the Orcas subdivisions. These subdivisions have been platted and approved, but do not currently appear on the tax rolls. After an indepth study of the development ` in this area we have estimated the rate ofgrowth and the assessed value revenues that could be generated in this area. The other subareas; Bull Mountain I, Bull Mountain III, and the Walnut area, are riot experiencing the same rate of growth as Bull Mountain II, but all contain large amounts of developable acreage. This includes approximately 780 acres of land Currently under- farm or forest land deferral. Land which is under deferral is typically valued at $350 to $1,000 per acre, which is contrasted with an average of $28,000 Per' lot for acreage which has been subdivided. eg gg Eel= 11 BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT AREA 3` DEVELOPMENT PROJECTIONS Urban Development Housing Units Population _o Platted and Approved Lots = 607 1,459 o Recent Applications or 385 924 Projects in Process, Lots: Additional�ey l ^^,�r,i Mw 1992 (?) o Current Area Households & Population 2.,-137 o Total Development by 1992 (?) X874 Assuming normal development timelines of Approved and In-Process units, current areaoWulation will more than double within five years. That means an average 20X-increase per year each year for the foreseeable future, on traffic (Beef Bend, Bull Mountain, Walnut, etc.), storm drainage and other " urban impacts, or 400-500 new residents per year. This development is occurring under current Comprehensive Plans, with or without annexation to the City. 25,000 BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT POPULATION 20,000 - - 15,000 10,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 2000 2010 2020 12 Natural Features' Bull Mountain isa steep-sloped landform with a flat, elongated crest area. Elevation at the peak, just north of Bull Mountain Road and 144th Avenue near -High Tor Drive, is approximately 700_ feet. The northern and southern low land areas are more gently sloped and 'largely forested with a` number of narrow, ' steep ravines which act as natural. drainage, channels. 'Drainage on the southern slope has been complicated by development, more specifically, installation of sewer lines which follow the natural channels. Given the sensitivity of the soil to disturbances of this nature, there is likely to be further erosion in this area without the implementation of a drainage management program. The norther low land area is susceptible to flooding in the rainy season, a problem which also "needs to be addressed before responsible development can occur. At present there is no drainage management ' service provided by Washington County. _ The Bull Mountain area has been designated a critical groundwater area since 1974, when it was determined that groundwater levels were dropping at a rapid rate. The State Water Resources Department has monitored the levels since 1974 and has recently determined that they are now returning to normal. It is expected that the critical groundwater area designation will be rescinded in the near future, thereby lifting any restrictions that may accompany that designation. 15 Transportation Network The existing transportation network may be described as adequate for• the current population, but it will need to be upgraded to handle increased capacity as development occurs. The only Principal Arterial in the study area is Pacific Highway, which intersects with Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road, both classified as major collectors. Scholls Ferry Road, which forms the 'northwestern boundary of the study area, is classified as a minor• arterial. There is currently a plan to widen and add .a turning lane to Scholls Ferry Road between the intersection of Old Scholls Ferry and Highway 217. This would relieve the congestion at the ill-designed intersection of Old and new:Scholls Ferry Roads, as well as aiding the traffic flow to 217. �wBull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road both carry the most significant amounts of traffic from the Bull Mountain area. These roads are in need of widening and curve realignment in order to handle additional traffic as a result of development which will feed these roads in the Bull Mountain II area. Walnut Avenue is also a major collector and also intersects with Pacific Highway. The surface is in poor• condition from the vicinity west of 121st and is very poor at the intersection of 135th. Probably the worst road of the entire study area is 132nd which is in dire need of grading. There are currently no bicycle or pedestrian networks within the study area but both the Washington County transportation plan and the Tigard park plan contain provisions for bike paths and pedestrian walkways, k g b i ,I All streets within the study area, with the exception of private roads, are under the jurisdiction of Washington County. The County's policy in regards to transfer• of jurisdiction is riot set. At this time, the County prefers to retain -jurisdiction of arterials and collectors, but transfer• jurisdiction of local streets. s Scholls Ferry Road is state—owned and maintained. ArB !7 40 r' 47 2H kA as ;—J—. 6 .— , .fes I; , �i 5800 51 0 I W. 1 '".. f^ I '1f •. .+% 0 -�-� .r STAT ��' 00 11` r.r - ! - —'� _' 0f iJ it r_ --� 'I r•! J goo ---- \� I� -. // / �/,• ', 27�+U-340 ;#,f�J:! ILII .6' ! /. � ! A O O it I I` e I It I\4 ct• I; !ia , �- cc f ¢P CD �c 0 t , ��"l;tet�(/�.\. ,*r/• a�n�\I• -,��.,�I�.•�-'�•C I '1. hJl Y r//•:a..+ o N a !: tt_j Jl. ! orf_-.s \, _r ,�1\l\ _ !i.✓ ^t !!' '��?lr� �:.v��I '' `'"f' 1150 i �.`' '•` ��Y 'I� IJ ��`�� ,.i-:7 i �t � a t -�; •!1200 ,•�t f__ - .7i: f��. :%^1•+1,t S �Qa`�.�+�-'"�I � I � i.f ,,'�• '.'/!�°slg' + e { _y •►.6,' =� Ii��•�' t �l/Jv 3 '-` �, iil {�1� .. f 1 get IO to i r%? {i i 6 20071 M <. 110 11 '{ 00' 460 — — / c. 100 tll100 ® =9 - Z 1J O I� ] I ®14 ! � �, o :1X00, 1100 _ 9100 1 � � ®®.1100 `9400 , 1300 1300 I :I REUSeERRo !g 0 �s !"� ii ®00 FIGURE 22 ashen t®n LEGEND Projected P�9 Pork Hour Dunt g t� Volume by Direction Traffic �io9RAr91e v Y of Yravel PUBLIC WORKS --, ---Proposed Facility TIGA,RD-BULL MTN Area 18 III. URBAN SERVICES Services in the unincorporated areas of Washington County are provided by 'a number of special service districts, some of which also serve area municipalities. Washington County "Count 2000" Plan �^ In 'order to cope with consistently under—funded urban 'services programs, Washington County has proposed a plan to provide road maintenance and police services to urban unincorporated areas until these areas annex to municipalities a process the County views as inevitable. The County 2000 plan provides for "interim service" until 1992-93, at which time the County expects annexation procedures to be in 'place for most unincorporated areas. The County 2000 plan is an attempt by Washington County to fit limited resources to sarvice demands in view of population growth and the subsequent demands on urban services which result. Basically, the plan covers two areas which need immediate attention. PoliceServices The unincorporated areas of Washington County have an approximate papulation of 115,000 persons. Currently there are 56 sworn patrol officers to serve the 19 areas. Because of increases in crime and a larger inmate population in the County jail facility, the Sheriff's Department expects the number of patrol officers to be reduced in order to serve the necessary duties at the detention facility. Currently the response time for priority 1 and 2 calls to the Sheriff's Office are in the neighborhood of 15 minutes or more. For priority 3 and 4 calls the response time is up to an hour. For some calls there is no response at all. The proposed Police Service District would increase the patrol officers by 84. Even this increase would riot enable the County to provide police protection at the same level as municipalities which are adjacent to unincorporated areas. At :the Boundary Commission public hearing on June 11, 1987, Washington County Sheriff, Bill Probstfield, acknowledged that the increase in patrol officers was necessary just to maintain police protection �w at'a basic level. Because the Police Service District would be sunseted in five years the question was raised about job security and sense of commitment the "temporary" patrol officers would have. Probstfield's response was that they would undoubtedly be picked—up by municipalities who will annex- the unincorporated areas by year 2000. This is the goal of County 2000; to provide what basic level of urban service resources will allow with the goal of encouraging annexation to logical service providers — municipalities. The enhanced sheriff patrol districtwill be funded by a voter-approved levy of $0,78 per 1,000 assessed value for property owners. This translates into $67.88 per year for a single family dwelling valued at $87,000, } 3 20 Road Maintenance Washington County has approximately 1,200 miles of 'roads under its jurisdiction. About 700 miles, or 58 percent, of these roads are local roads. Given the limited resources the county has for road maintenance, these local roads are the last priority for maintenance and improvement. The County 2000 response to the problem is to create a County Service District for local' urban road maintenance which will, in effect, be a user fee. The County is developing a method for assessing and collecting these fees but a preliminary study shows that the average cost per household would total $50 per year. Sewer Sewer service is provided to the study, as all of Washington County, by the Unified Sewerage Agency. The only service within the study area is in the Bull Mountain II subarea. This area drains south to the Tualatin basin through the King City area. Officials at USA predict that sewer mains leading from the study area are adequate for projected development in this subarea and it only remains for local improvement districts to form in order to provide service to the south face of the mountain. Development on the western portion of the mountain will require a pump station. Development on the north slope of the mountain is restricted by the lack of, sewer- lines in this vicinity. Lines will have to be installed from the Weir trunk to serve the area of Scholls Ferry Road, while the area north of 135th will be served by lines in the vicinity of Summer Lake.` 21 The Walnut area is virtually unsewered at this time with the exception of a small neighborhoodwhichadjoins the City of Tigard, north of Walnut Avenue. By agreementbetween the City and U.S.A., any development connecting to sewer through City—owned lines must annex to the City to be entitled to use City line capacity, Water Water service is provided by the Tigard Water District. Currently, the Water District serves all developed areas and the master plan provides for service reaching the entire study area as development occurs. Fire Protection The study area is served by the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District (TRFPD) and in the northeastern corner by Washington County fire District #1.- TRFPD has stations in downtown Tigard and south of King City. Washington County #1 has a station just northwest of the study area at Reusser and Weir Roads. The response time is generally within five minutes throughout the study area, but improvement of the transportation network would shorten response. Foi- those areas with fire hydrants, virtually all developed areas, the fire insurance_rating is Class 3. For areas without fire hydrants the rating is Class 8 or 9, 4 f 22 a "4sF fl ,., .�:��.�„ �*-"'^��+�''r��' -•._ ?:^""-, -s «x�xx� x�, .�� m '.tom` ," ?' ..`��s'.` m,�:t�; _�?',�"`..` �rmk-'..-.:sem - �+.��,� �� 86ti6t� xax��►�8+'�bet, iy+�,�g '°q6" �"�+X..y.m:� ,t� �� e`,y�aJA a •k � �syi. �K38f� i 3��, >,.-.. :...� m �� s y� 3w- �h4 �1 '-��j�'' +,•��k - r t .,, £S9. BtSq ri �� , ..�.: 3��9fA flf, w.s�;:._+u�'�.�� ,� � J��Ia Mrd +.e. Y''0*ip. •+9�` �moi.• ii1�i F�i��3$3 a4. ftR ,88f '� � a d w � 4a saw 1 R ®: OR Sat m s611NINf111 f� owl I ;. =;-ter ■`� �t1 t�-�� av�e{,��r� �� I------ G�r�■��R��f�L3_i C..w'.'C'vv"�1$ �.F' �� •� � �� .�Sr�..��/yrs ��' H s` r �€ V9" Nr ��►, � *�."�.. � .,�.;; 4"5 -b ,' `.'ae',a '�k r � � •"' '°" ra me ..�v,,, .. �� '� as Rf 8831E 9t3F9�1$ a t'r v �6LR�ae 4�'$�P' '�r,�� Q '�lsg '•. of �r .d� "'� '';ry {x ,.A r; r � Rtf,;r� ' o,Q�3� yaa tilAf rigy1�� ,�R,vf�pp spf�^-d' ��Rfl4 ��- ��'at;,. •�, ,�;�a ��,� 8#8� k.�� r � c}� �•. .10 Rftl 6Bf �'� ,rt4 �„".: x 2� g r {• �^ p'k •-s:-'cs ¢ �t t�,-S m.-.r "a;r� Mir jr o � Asn sae+ mz M �: ��} d '*gCCe�% d tk4K7��•.w..�44C7 00?]ll(K9Q2 "`�' a"3'• �.EEsa 5�it°Q' $ r ,gQUeiF'., �q N•K r. Rq"dDG898 *atx'x A xn, �•�—� 1^iii. J•E .�y■ ■■iii' ��a��+� Nil ova#1 Agagg �. •�W�, .fi ------- �gk ON-RIW 4^ix ,I � � , M X ed -. �y y51: 7 ...... MR, X} hW, yR .......... ��. - 9-� ., r.., S a• X!.-• '*..,:.. a n.?y,"fs_,. q :.j..; =tr x -t 1 _ � � ``��•- & ��',, �i; '4 x ,� �r+ � �.k*' '�` ��7�.'i`i,u�. s,�t 4-i':r i"� �.�ar'�,t-�-C'�t..rt-.��Y T .n..r'szgt *•�` �" B'��` ,5. x +S' ...x�.7; J^S,�' �Z +}.a.��Y "ri�.�' K�.��..�'?xu :'�`-3.•".. '�.i.:in�r'�,su"4��:tr"i';'�.a,s'. r.'x�� .,��w' '.-s..�s�..,�.:�s.�5,-.n,c �,.�'�". _+�� .x"i" n:�i:Y.�k7.fis�.•�s+�r Planning and Development Services_ f Planning and developmentservicesare currently provided by the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation in conjunction with the j Neighborhood Citizen Participation Organization for• Bull Mountain. Their (� collaboration has produced a community plan for Bull Mountain which is very general in nature but pr•escr•ibes some specific guidelines for development in this area. School Districts Tigard School District 23J serves most of the study area. Beaverton School District 1148 serves the northwestern portion of the Bull Mountain III ` subarea. District 231 levies $1.2.10 per $1,000 assessed value - while Beaverton #48 levies $14.10 per $1,000. Parks and Recreation There are currently no parks or• recreational facilities in the study area. Those residents who live in the portion of Bull Mountain III within Tax District 48 have access to facilities in the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District-, while all have access to Tigard's Summer Lake Park and other facilities within the Tigard park system. The Tigard Park Plan provides for park facilities consisting of ten acres per 1,000 residents. The Park Plan has identified some area which would be suitable for parks in the study area. •The fiscal year tax rate for THPRD is $1.47/thousand of assessed value. l j Lmffmwi 25 } ' Libraries The study area, as all of Washington County, has access to the Washington County Cooperative Library System. The Tigard Library is part of- this system. 'Other Services There are virtually no street lights in the study area. New developments may join a County Street Lighting District at $4 $5 per month per household. Storm drainage management is also non- existent. A County-wide Storm Drainage District is currently under review at $2 - $2.50 per month per household. yO 26 IV. REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES In order to analyze the revenue and expenditure potentials for the study area if annexed, a detailed study was conducted using information provided by Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, the Washington County Assessor's Office, the regional Metropolitan Service District, and the Portland State Center for Population Research. Using this information we were able to determine the assessed value of the property in the study area, the population, the number of households, total acreage, vacant and buildable acreage, and acreage currently under farm and forest deferral. From this information, projections were made in revenue from assessed property value and extrapolated to include revenues from non-property tax sources. These projections were also based on development patternswithinthe 'study area. After conferring with County subdivision personnel and focal developers, we have estimated the rate of development. This procedure -was- necessary asnecessary in view of the rapid development in the Bull Mountain II subarea in order to calculate the assessed value since this information is not yet available from the standard sources. Population projections were calculated from the number of households which will result from current development. Our, projections for population at density, which for our purposes is labeled "Year 2000," may differ from the projections by Metro by 2005. Our information is based on a model that 27 differs from that of Metro and was created for a more specific study with more local information. Metro will be updating its information in the spring of 1988 and will be soliciting projections from local areas in order to adjust its regional model for population projections. MOTE: In projecting revenue/exp�me estimates, 1987 dollar values were held constant. No attempt was made to, estimate or adjust for inflation. mh/0025a C{ 28 00 0 M1 W 14 O W Orli DCO O c0 Ln CV 4 4j C3 0 4.) 0 14 N`CJ -W O� ---------------- 0i co(d $.4 O I -------------- m N P4 a d 1 r O d�Ha 1 Q E-+ b4 u 1 W 1 r-1 t � z-+ i Q 1 W a at T ^ > Etn -� O F-i I N o N E� I � co ' 4 0 N ! O I . o zn a 0 A Ln I 1 � I ' 1 I i 1 ! 1 1 Iss 1 O O I ,p O I 1 ON > O (n 01 d 6 x C O 6 u1 O O \, CV N O Qa w0 OX ro a o<c a E-+ %r, 29 t:::•:::::t:•:•: :•:::•::•:::: ::•: 00 Ln is t: F: z F•.•:::::::. to z #: uis�unoW TTnff 'n e' cn •.... co :::•:::.•...�.:::::�::::•: �� ate ®� �®® ::. ::.:....::.... O DW cn II uie�unOW TTnS a tn �i . H to K:::•::•. ! Tetauapxsag pas2tZ tn 0'1 # •{F F �®iF#3F1F####�#9F3FiE##iE•x•#®#•JF•k•# iF#� ^ ! anuTEM v> o a o 0 0 roa � —! w •% a, 7. O N tR. tn 0 Ln CD Ln >,a N N H ro a ice. $4 P. WOy a O X P.p Pk.H �o � 30 --r----••. '. ppm jy. S, 5 at r , C� 4 c 6 1}x - '3 _ - • Il.i�r l zai r t i ' • q l�h i { k ki �. L f s ',dtYL � J1/ 7 gh�l�� ti Y I r�y f> 4 .• � ,r u L • r ii + 1 i i•C ' 4 lP { -. J - -4 '�`" G tR. 2 .:r t .l f I ri{jl J yl 5 C wr✓,s X Yl 3 � � x - < Q� P � P L � � g MINOR a m g 9i o m g o a° Cl 6 W y � M °i 32 t r:.r..-c-.-i �, ,.1 .,� ,r,. ,.,> ,�-.-.T-._: "_. _v...s",.--..,;-'-r,==�-+fr•---.-'.. �'_�.,r �'"`z,u-+^rrc t _ t��_ _ '�`'t.._ r' a y r r Ji z 1: ' t t 7R�, p - � 5 ' r�csi �yw t fa, ft �u c r y � s • �`ij Y 'F ' c 7 j f i � • . r� o.�7 +^ f It Y 7 - •• Yf�S4H��i t na +ht hr�t iy ti S 5 r, .• t yy,�Yy:. .• fir��r t�1} Y ink rsy. i / r d: `N {, 4 r 3it..s.3� S' 1 yt e 1- f � 1( 4 t' • s 6+. � r 'r r fr L • ;3 S4, • - ) " Y4� i� d Y;•, 1 mR 3 _ l 4 Y +d — ) 4 — u.1 _ • ! i �r x; T±' • r _ t 22� • � ff r • •a 1 i a i i APPENDIX C 35 77, __.. ._ . N � t v 000 Q N N t 00 to N � 0 N N Qcl �.:.. nO M M m Ln ( v v N 0 0 'ain co 0 .i t - p N O Q+ N � n0 en m 04m co O m m 00 v n a m0 a ol 00 O v . O If) 'a N n a 4. M t p M .•� a v ... N a' LO \ Ln ? O ` .4 N 0 _ aD O n ami r+ m. m.. w L: L a L b N b v v 9 O N m C ti U m 04 vlo - m u N n W 4-4j a.. •O C � u a c m 9 L 4J 41 O Id co.Ew a' p O 0 v a'-� \E a m W w m Ln ch m wj a ma. m ' 7 N Olo G a ? � y a a.L m 7 y ¢ a CO O.L.. 1 a ¢ m c 41 Q.3 Q—mO.m O �C7 E 0,. n ro 7 T GO. L Q •O cofs fud 6 a me you f6'o � u s ¢tj O N b m N J1 U W .. O a•.� reB x .:L. m 3 ,, u ' 36 I i P, n: @ C! @ 1a rn w O a 10 O O N � � ,N @ ,e Q O ¢ M O .�+ O M N M t0 nl M O @ C4 1 10 fl\ 01 .Ni .i 10 N O m @ o N 0 n @ @ A a 10 m a Inn m a n m O@ m 0 co° °° @ n n n m e m .+ @ N N m n @ \ •• h� h o, C. O Ln @ a m a m ID U a w @ M O O in O N 0 N 1n 10 m m 10 O O 01 .D O i11 N a N @ n� 1Q w ,y .-, 1n N < N aC4 h w s1 A N 19 11 - .•i m m 10 ¢ a ... v m M m O M O o O 0 O N w N v Ln M rn m N m w 10 0 10 N N '•' co m O. @ n m .1 N 001 m N N •••� w 10 -C a! --. M a w O m o m O O O O O @ O. w N N w M h M w .D O 10 N 10 N 10 @ @ \n t0 M @ 1n w N @ N co n O @ O1 m N .d .a N w .-1 N +r w w A A A IR @ Va ai z @ a w o 10 u. @ m w m @ w O O O O O N N� ^+ ti N m � h rn 1n LO n a O N N .+ Z N. dGo .. v n � C v C 4 - o a w a ro V... y v » 0 aE x x .0 a a a �c x ° xrt c`ti z° 41 m o N +' a ti w c o .0 a a a V N L to L. U T 1 a OL W N O •+ T Y to y A C7 t- 3 O a a I aci a 37 7. N ill to m m m it1� a O N N N m Nm B N N � O \ m N N 0 Cn N Q. M m n.. m m D+ ,n� an Ul m r ^ n n M mm OO m n m N O, Nm O r-, a m ^ d o e.. .,i C b �O m a, n M N ti u 4 - 1/) mj m O r, O O m m p v O ,D. N m M N < m N C ,D rl ,n m u m O 0 O O m n ,n m N ,--� lo N m m� N Q V n N v W co b n < \O m N ti x C m O n B O a. _ n r, a - C .+ y O n 49 a m a c p U a Ha - .. W i �.1I •+1-I d .fir N d O v m O cL C + E D nn U m 7 t M seu a o a E® a0i oNi .Oi L O U O— G \ 7 n..I O La to > v 3 L U.o a o 2 N ! 0 4 o u. w 11 a G mH a.O. x A L O o 7 4 fa. ° r, .-rei Z t a re G o a re a tpt re a a U ;..� 0 0 a E y -...Z7 ++ 0. a . . n. 38 _.i. " re as CD i o m d m m * 0 + + �+, ,+, .+. .t co co p 0 Op $ Op ao o o 0 m O OCh m C4 a, . Ch b \ Ln 0 co M m 0' N n rn m `v tmo ,nui n m ,n M .. n M M r M 0 0 0 O ?C N 0 0 0 0 0 0a 10 OD a n O O O O O C m \ b l O _m to n n 00 0 w a m to h tp ,A tp n O 0 R o n N. N a N ~ ID 0 mco 0 ~ m n M _ c 0 it K m 0 ,n O a O m r, a m O O O O O O e m N '" m C O 0 00 0 0 NO 0, n _ CD 7 0 O m Sd + conk! Ft v + v 0 fn 04 C" O O m ,n m O O O O 0 M �. m O to.. O O r. o m m 0 10 ON 04 y -a L.: _ O M T= K N10 O ti r, + + Ln v O m 0 -p m O O ,n N ^' N u C m O t''a 0 0 LO In tOO m O+ N O L 4j 4J V q C C vi L 3.a b m O rd CD ..Ei. 11 O O O r r6 rd W W m In tq O, um m n ofis m M ? Nol .O m a c¢o, ° o 0 o m a N L L 0 O 0 0 0 O 0rd L 7N h N T N O N tnn .-, ,A ,A O N Qjri. f6\ •O L L 00 00 O.O 00 00. 00 00 a 7 :� 00 so w n C u ui+ O O O O O.O O O O O 00 O O „ „. ¢..6 J ¢. O O A m 00 00 00 ,n A 0 0 a E n 9 m•O m C u H. 61 O O N u7 h ,[a O O ,11 O N N O O 6•.� » C O cS.H ¢.q ,a .invO0v0°i vnyn vN » L O =. LB 41 d., .O aA Qt8 vt0 X,D X.T V W O 1.a Qa CE m qn Ba oo x., N x,n X., Xto , X +'d `s a GL. 'Z V m 11 II O If M 11 Ln II II ON it j Vw cit w 3 W CL X139 9q° o m o ak ale � * *. xc * h�°�° ss°. 2 i ,.iCL r, 0 en p N O N c M N - O -b C m -c n cn M� N c m M e rn m M n N N M m N n O .+ n c c • a v >m v oa O . N O m O N O N in ¢ � a' .+ 41 q 11 tn Ot N M co n in ^ ^ M. M 10 nID r, 01 NI, O ti C .••i N ¢ -.ip11 O N N CL rn ry a N n10 C, r O n :,Q .+ M co -W a, n. O a n O N M < \ O in N M - O� m .. O .n c v M10 p. W tClQ 11" I� ¢ o N Q 0$ N N co m O N h .. m 2 Col m M b O 4 N Q M M N m .+ M in N N M Q N Q In In m CDC, p O O w O m a2 �� e N0 I\ N . -+ N co M a N Q O• N Q 1n N.\ M u1 n � n co N C 04 a m c aa H n O Aj L ns E CID O H 7 .j tl1 61. 3 F O ¢ a j Go a N cn co ~ C7 T v a c o rd y .+ .+ m .. d WIS. rnl U N 0. G7 a P{,.: _pc O 0. r to V mi, lim IN= VON ligi�pljg� 11 m N n h C < N p :Q � b N Mb IMI� O n N O M N H b N N Ip In N m Q A m - n N �7 v co m C4 Itf O O IO N•I� h N O O b at t!1 h N \ M c m Ln m n e n a b n n M A b N U N' N A rM r h In a• Q w N m M y C b m a N h m Q N M b N .-•I Q In Q m C \ N b m h h W N n O m M Nb O n O m y n m m 0 e v c N O� n If1 OI O• n I[I N M v ol 0 Lo to to C Q o A M u ~ m rn m 0 A O rt C N O b� b m N m m In v CD N N In p Ip In N N M p \ CD m O N C h h m O M n A m M A b u n b m m Io M N N O lo fT m OI C m Q \ OI N o IO ^ h In N p N o + b OI L n A O a O n Lo 4.R. m •O kA C C sA U a Q w H a C VI v m S O a 0 O E 9 O N m ••u+ Y U 4, N O =a m O a a a 3 a U U a C o v m F o c O a u . a+ x z v a a a n> n .+ n p w w -P a c Q f�A r 0 O A E O a .Lra •w Up RID L Z O .0 o- a rI xw O Z v. '.J U F M F 6 w O q. 2 41 < o 0 0 < < m o ID su 0) H lb rt iD rt M ON O,11 C N N 0 0 _ O . w Ili C H O 9 O.w w S 7 w© A M N N O N m C „,.0 O O rr C-, V w tr A w'O 0 ON 5: .C ID W v r CO v ry c'p cf w 0 w O.a O M 0.. O. w r, w.<, ar r-. O. W :.au w 0. < O r \ D '. N:. w w A ro w O v w ID C- * a ID CL I 7 iD O CL w a V V A W CO rl ri a rn v w N.-b L. 00., _.O 00 w. rt 3 KfD m (t'.aw Y. m rt ° w A ID It- 10� � W N 3 7 O r rt w V a V O+ V V W V 9 H w co n co °. rn"e > m co O.. w a+ + O Y• 3 r to -n ID r o e _..0 w ` co 10 a �D ® .• V O .. a w co A b N O b V w U+ V 0 ON O m N I O r 10 + + w w LTA N N a V 0 W V Dt N V lT N Y' Vr W 1 N O 10 a, 10 v N n + + w w r - O p V w pID Ch r O w x O 0 O - N W n IJi V } 00 it 8� i N OO O O O O O O O O O O p p p p O p O O O O O O ,o 0 N v n m a v O O O O O C OI b O c O M Cr ,a h m O m O N N m O n CT N ^� p O a 1. m j rn M p m ,o m b m O O < a v n C,. m� a CT of CT N .N-� (mn Q N O N Ln N 'm A to n m n 1 p .+ h m M N 1f .a C a1 . cm —T3 Ol O U M N to V N n NN .1 ao 04 O O N o N : CTI \ m Cn tt+ n N-i m d N C N Ln C^1 rl T 0 J.. .i.. N M M N LO ..1 .a Y7 CT n m U N N b c�... Q M l] N M m v ,o 00 ,a m p p c a \ ut a rn N m n n a, a N n aai n '+ m a N O N. ,fl m �o C a, ai... .r. ., N iCf. u p N o a a N M m ,D mIn 0 ID m to m O O 6 v < n ¢ mI a .+ N C 11'1 N n .N-1 M Q N to N O. N 111 CTI m h CT M h 01 M1 I!'1 n mj m .-� .� Nm M N 111 .+ W n m N n v n () p h N d N 111 ^>- N M M 0 m r1 H l{ a h N Q mO m p m o o n m n a z m� n n O n cl � Lr) .N-1 m < N O N ,11 CT� 1L/1 n L Ln '9 a c v M O O N o ^� N N C n Go t, v CV 9ly p a OH. U m a X v E Cn N O CV SCD F- x 2 a U L is 3 2 e1 n O 40.1 F L. x H m .+ y a a tV 3 ix'.y U a ti" Q1 2 �. � 7 w W L t .. Z .-�i '�O � t. 16 3 L N Lal . 21 ..1 L 9 0 F Cn. O a. C+ U N J:. 0 U aa.3 a CO N F- a ¢ 4 3 01p N O 0`.. 0 N.. C b O _N O C O a+f N .y v 0 m.. �n Imo.. m O d .r pp N On �.: C 0 N N.. 0 CN a 1 q m Oco ( m n m n p Q, Q1 "" mcc m Ov N m 1c W N � OJ pl N N d t, N N10 .+ n Lo m L 2 0 d 1 a C C H S M U C C- d CL N ;t O aj0 cGI C m 7 C �'� ON 0. ..ui x U N d. O d m ( 0 CL O Cl H. 0 O :W Y y C 7 al U CU — L E O Q Y O. U n x 91 W OZ a v 44 I big K n n 00 v0000 - 0 Co 1 0 %0 O. N p- , p N N 00 m m n n c ,-i m ` N C m o N 1 o m m a m O n rn n O vv m N m /•M M M - + + v - p O O N �f7 O O 10 b O OO ,D <00.i am ko O c 4 w NQ7 N N .y N ,0. �p O v v t .}i .t.. t 0 c O 00 O 00 0.0- 10 Ln N 0 k W p N C � N O O C O O O O 0 W mN O W N 00 0 n n Lf)COc W O C4a0® N. N w 0,Cj at `O C Qo co 10 > O ^7 O Np �N h. h to m + � .. p .+ 000 O O OO. `Q n O O O n a h e h cOiOm 00 00 0 n N n C N c� 0� C N b... �0 Q a 0 m Cal rn in D N Q7 m v L d fa24m C } 2t O v M t co _ 7 b000 O v w M O O O 00 03 N O ,D U M b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u ,. 00 0 m 0 0 ,o Lnn N.N N,0 N O m m N h ti 'os no ` Cal c 7 l L 3 N c 0 .y 0 m ~ d T O N v 4-y 10 V M rl N C u d O N� u L 1i b 0 0 u O O c w vi u. w 00�. 000 m 6 = N Ll n v° .; tn m .2f6 b >n O n n 4- d � cb" .o r rn my v co b Cade 7 N a7 N .p N V N N M d v L U 0 N U J w m 0 cu 7 N d 041 Id ci O ' .ti ++ r.m N , N 0 t6/ 7 T7 N .O O C 41 0 (6vi c7i\.'.8 .Oi Lam. L\ O >U ti G O Q N N p duu. •+ V 41 0 f" N r8 u •� 3 iYi.O a O .� N L a, O .-� N ¢ 0 •,a d u rb :� O. O N n .CON t�-.p b C. D• 7 0) et 0� N Y W u N C E H M �D i { 1 i y 1 I OI � .. d �y O L 1J 0 U Oo 0+ 0+ N L N 7 U 0-- O v v 00 m cD O, C• L co b L CL O W 0 o a 41v E° �° ¢ 45 N co 14 :I S N M M a 0.W O O N n O to N n M r0 N On. N .a+ N N� M. .. M .-� M N � N E O N ~ m [ N O In m O nO N M ono m In fin M N < n rl n TC%l ..� n 0� N R N m rn � o lj U en a •� m c 0 Ln 0 c4 O O.. M n d ^� Ln In N O N \ M co lo S ^ N O C N N "� N N N !{t cl co [ co d d 4 . U n a ,p o+ ID t pw .rLnmocl C11 .a OO N 'o d N O N `� O i n � Ln m N (T v 0. m. N n cl Incl N O Oco � Z m N O€ M f+ M d n d M O. N d .+ O 09 �O N m co cli.. n m lo v O¢ p s. %. v v p0 NO N C U') r, 4 cl Q Z O M \. m O N `n N d m n n M cl co M N t� M c lo n m m yr. Ln N 0 2 V H CJ ,C V C N O o 54 16 L rd EP ix c K c 41 3 c _ W W y - - o ,� a ¢ 46 a o t c U N U a 3aco Q w .NN O 'n O N v � A � m - m h M • A m rn M m m lo Ic co Ln �G N Ln u < m rn N ^ C b N rn .+ ^ m m Q of a ti by n.. tf! N ip :.Oi :N M m ^ l M N Q CO N n n Co e+ n W N 'O N N .+ Q p C. h N io d� Ln Ln n N co Q oCi v 0.... Ln In of oNof :�c col0 w m Io In b � N N to O H co 1 4.+ n n N m m .••i p N m a,— In M N Q m M N -c [ - co to N n 01 M M r m In G1 lo M A to u M 07 O7 co.+ P1 N No� LnC O N P if1 I� m N tv N C M m co W in n in u L N d V414 c c U mV d w cL V x o 4j 0 E 3 O N O.- ••� x J d O d. 7. N a O > L.... L m. N Z m n 2 L ul O U o— C 7 0 � O d d 'd 3. d U U Qd C o •O n T O — o U 4- W Y d C m H w 0 x r L :. .R d O M of O c O: U f6 d .-1 L .-+ r+ rC 2 a L c o n. X W _ O�. c O 0 c N O 0 ¢, u LU o m y .� U h 1•i v h• a. 47 I lit UtttUUNIAN,THURSDAY,AUGUST 6,1987 11M 4M ll streei of Dreamas onh,, a stam forarea By MARTHA ALLEN apparent hostility toward the devel cor sPOW"4 The or.00Wen opment.At a party held for area res idents on the home show site just TIGARD-More than 100,000 before the show's opening,she said eople are expected to attend the many comments reflected wonder eet of Dreams home show this..onth on Bull Mountain,but area $YET®F DREAMS about the beauty and size of the residents and city officials are look the new residents would DIRECTION MAP O homes and speculation about whc ing beyond the summer traffic to the Q 'These people will be our neigh• development's long-zange signifi- p aors,"she said. canoe for the community. a City officials say they have no borN Those neighbors,and then ad di. immediate plans to capitalize on the tion to t would make a fine adds• $5 million development or the traffic tion to the city,according to Bill it will generate.But city representa• TIGARD Q Monahan,Tigard director of com- tives and members of the local 3 munity development neighborhood association agree that L The fact that that construction is, r taking place in an area that will G become Tigard is a positive thing;' Five other Monahan said."It carries a certain amount of prestige,and the addition subdivisions have of those neighborhoods will create Al high-quality housing and add a been approved. higherlevel ofdiversity toour hous- ing opportunities." BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD Monahan suggested that the subdivision is just a taste o€- Street of Dreams development could to come. ---t'�ef+� spur more high-cost development on t ."ve other subdivisions on Bull Bull Mountain. "Though it is Mountain— MOUNTAIN .,N already occurring,this could stimu- e m GATE late more in the near future and may n prompt more annexations sooner. prove y as mgton County ,w It's natural for those neighborhoods within the last 20 months.With an to want to annex to the city for sere eye on the development just outside 4ff2 ices" STREET OF its door,the city has undertaken a ac Tigard officials may be proud of study of the area that may be p prel- DREAMS L-1000" � having the show in their area, ude to annexation. Froude conceded.But she added:"I ' "We're very pleased to have the think the Street of Dreams means "et of Dreams in our communi• something different to the people said Tigard Mayor Tom Brian. who live here now.It's one small "Even though that area isnot within street in the Mountain Gate subdivi• our city limits,the people who live "We are gathering data, so that videdservices vs.county service dis• cion,which will have 205 houses i there will shop and go to school in ,when the time comes,everybody can tricts. when it's all-built. And Mountain Tigard.We feel the Bull Mountain make better decisions." Fronde said the citizens'group Gate is only one of five major subdi- area is part of the larger Tigard com• The Street of Dreams show,and had not taken an official stance on visions planned. munity:' the surrounding subdivisions, the question of annexation by "It's like this is just the first wave And i4 may someday be a part h which are in various stages of plan- Tigard or any other city. of a whole flood of developments." an enlarged Tigard city, though ning, are in unincorporated Fronde said she was uncertain B was quick to point out that the Washington County.County rest- what effect the Street of Dreams B ._ , u sea stu7" dents who live outside cities will would have on the people living on h no p ase one o an annexa WBull Mountain,though there was no etlvote this fall on whether to form" three service districts to provide anyy "We're not interested in forcing annexations,"he said."I urban services—one to provide that the area eventually will be feel police protection,one for road main- tenance in urban unincorporated : j within the city,but that's a long way areas and one for road maintenance Off." The Buil Mountain-Walnut area in rural areas. study will assess the immediate and homeowners on Bull Mountain long-term urban service needs of the will have an opportunity to learn area,which includes the new devel• more about the proposed county opments on Bull Mountain and an service districts at a meeting at 7:30 area west of Tigard between Walnut p.m.Aug.19 in the Portland General Street and Bull Mountain Road.The Electric Co.offices,14655 S.W.Old study will look at how much it Schoils Ferry Road, Beaverton. would cost the city to provide road, County representatives will meet sewer and police protection to the with residents to explain the dis• area,which is adjacent to the city on tricts and their costs. the west. The meeting was arranged by Started in June,the study has a local citizen participation organiza• target completion date of next tions.Beverly Froude,leader of the spring,Brian said. citizens'group on Bull Mountain, ";ked if the city were interested said getting people to attend the i� sexing the new subdivisions on forum was a priority of the group. mountain,Brian replied:"'Phat's "I'm glad that Tigard is doing the a delicate question. study;'she said."We'll at least.be.. "We have no immediate plans, able to compare apples and apples; but because the issue is coming,vie we'll be talking about facts rather felt it would be prudent to determine than opinions,"when making deci• what our position will be,"he said. sions about annexation and d citypro- 48 t . MONISM ,� � wrail ', "1 * �"�`''� _• , ...C6 . &vv�0� ,U-2,0 g c o Sao g a a 0 0 •C �ilFit min b�� IN ww. R q , :19. d P °a w o�w�>yda 9 E 8r$ .p a,py� �p,9q 'p mQd a�Ady�p �a.ayw� as a� e.atie -� 1"yeti a Val C•' wYdY V cc o,�1p 20 1 ppp U- QSm e .Sm34 a aM 110H p a b� ,g M � � r J a z IM 8 Wt � 12 tali 9 s a 9 4i d«d I flip H $ s��a•� ��9F�o Ad4aW� -B it ca $a$ pa � � «"co a ,,gy�pt � ° `� s ed w•h�� 49 n= I i ''°v ° a gu=coq $g � �uYS_�+y��rs d p•vA a '� 03 0 'ama� doa3 i >A p mom I'm o. b � a p $ . old .�Ajl �- m7 H LL U: o� Q in go w F" WQ OT^cMMwy A b q .". ,s'.. «� « qW u SCL '� 4 g� k -e0 fl- I01 -ell X g $ iyIN m 50 a. 5 St w t S t 5 la � i41�Eln Iillnl,}5 z r►n�- ,�` �' f r4'AN Y 7 Jt i 1 ,ti' Ruhm`t.Jull�k a a= lira�tllyi51n1 {, ,, k lmu.�Lrc� C k V"s [luRt4ill iffla� 71R' �(II Ff/)Ill r r L� �'t fig,�lltlMlll� t' tt4 glt5lNlllulty- N Ip�', Ya e(Ull�flll tiOR a na. �Orill tlflil( i tt 4 ,L i 1 1 . ? n _ to 1,}lJ r� r •+_ ..+'xr'`., rY t s t 1;:,: r 1 r i s L' :k 1 Coil t f R�s1' t k k x , tk't r45 21I�t)li)l"+ Itll t t t 2 'kY F iLf �S�Cz��y{1141y�1lUlll , r = 1�5J7U�l1x t- Ti Z J ��il� f7S4 T tf i 4# f s 't �1 w r •inti yl;:�r.Jt�`'-,`,a,.'{,��) :r.4'� 1.. ..ti Il, I r ,fY tc, it 2 W J 11' 1 1 t '+k f i 5/86 WASHINGTON COUNTY - TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREAAGREEMENT 0i , 191 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this a day of b y WASHINGTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the AStaa of regon, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY," and the CITY OF TIGARD, an incorporated municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY." WHEREAS, ORS 190.010 providetaftanunits or alllocal funct9onsrandnts actmvitay iesethatinto a agreements for the performanceY i perform; and party to the agreement, its officers or agents, have authority p ; WHEREAS, Statewide Planning Goal 02 (Land Use planning) requires that City, County, State and Federal agency and special district plans and actions;shallbe consistent with the comprehensive plans of the cities and counties and .regional ' plans adopted under ORS Chapter 197; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission requires each jurisdiction requesting by nowledgement of which comprehensivepliancto submit an planning coordination9withintthe setting ..forth the means by Regional Urban Growth Boundary will be implemented; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY, to ensure coordinated and consistent compre- hensive plans, consider it mutually advantageous to establish: 1. A site-specific Urban Planning Area within the Regional Urban Growth Boundary within which both the COUNTY and the CITY maintain an interest in comprehensive planning; 2. A process for coordinating comprehensive planning and development in the Urban Planning Area; 3. Policies regarding comprehensive planning and development in the Urban Planning Area; and 4. A process to amend the Urban Planning Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. Location of the Urban Planning Area The Urban Planning Area mutually defined by the COUNTY and the CITY includes the area designated on Exhibit "A" to this agreement. II. Coordination' of Comprehensive Planning and Development A.' Amendments to or Adoption of a Comprehensive Plan or Implementing Regulation' 53 U 1 Page 2 1. Definitions Comprehensive Plan as defined by OAR 660-18=010(5) means a generalized, coordinated land use map and policy statement of the governing;body of a local government that interrelates all functional and natural systems and activities relating to the use of lands, including, but not limited to, sewer and water systems, transportation systems, educationalfacilities, recrea- tional facilities, and natural resources and air and water quality management programs. "Comprehensive Plan" amendments do not include small tract comprehensive` plan map changes. Implementin%_Reculation means any local government zoning ordi- mance, land division ordinance adopted under ORS 92.044 or 92.046 or similar general ordinance establishing standards for imple menting a comprehensive plan. Implementing regulation" does not include small tract zoning map amendments, conditional use per- mits, individual subdivision, partitioning or planned unit devel- opment approval or denials, annexations, variances, building permits and similar administrative-type decisions. 2. The COUNTY shall provide the CITY with the appropriate oppor- tunity to participate, review and con.. on proposed amendments to or adoption of the COUNTY comprehensive plan or implementing regulations. The CITY shall provide the COUNTY with the appropriate opportunity to participate, review and comment on proposed amendments to or adoption of the CITY comprehensive plan or implementing regulations. The following proceduresshall be fol l owed by the COUNTY and the CITY to notify and involve one another in the process to amend or adopt a comprehensive plan or implementing_regulation: a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the proposal, hereinafter the originating agency, shall notify the other agency, hereinafter the rEasponding agency, of the proposed action at the time such planning efforts are ini- tiated, but in no case less than 45 days prior to the final hearing on adoption. The specific method and level of involvement shall be finalized by "Memorandums of Under- standing" negotiated and signed by the planning directors of the CITY and the COUNTY. The "Memorandums of Understanding" shall clearly outline the process by which the responding agency shall participate in the adoption process. If, at the time of being notified of a proposed action, the responding agency determines it does not need to participate in the adoption process, it may waive the requirement to negotiate and sign a "Memoranduno of Understanding." b. The originating agency shall transmit draft recommendations on any proposed actions to the responding agency for its review and comment before finalizing. Unless otherwise agreed to in a "Memorandum of Understanding," the responding Page 3 agency shall have ten (10) days after receipt of a draft to t submit comments orally or in writing. Lack of response shall be considered "no objection" to the draft. c. The originating agency shall respond to the comments made by t the responding agency either;by a) revising the final recom- mendations, or b) by letter to the responding agency explaining why the comments cannot be addressed in the final C draft. d. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action. If after such consideration, the originating agency acts contrary to the position of the responding agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate appeals body and procedures, e. Upon final adoption of the proposed action by the origi nating agency, it shall transmit the adopting ordinance to the responding agency as soon as publiclyavailable, or if { not adopted by ordinance, whatever other written documen- tation is available to properly inform the responding agency of the final actions taken. f s, B. Development Actions Requiring Individual Notice to Property Owners 1. Definition Deveio ent Action Requiring Notice means an action by a.local government which requires notifying by mail the owners of pro- perty which could potentially be affected (usually specified as a distance measured in 'feet) by a proposed development action which directly affects and is applied to a specific parcel or parcels. Such development actions may include, but not be limited to small tract zoning or comprehensive plan map amendments, conditional or special use permits, individual subdivisions, partitionings or planned unit developments, variances, and other similar actions requiring a hearings process which is quasi-judicial in nature. 2. The COUNTY will provide the CITY with the opportunity to review and comment on proposed development actions requiring notice within the designated Urban Planning Area. The CITY will provide the COUNTY with the opportunity to review and comment on proposed development actions requiring notice within the CITY limits that may have an affect on unincorporated portions of the designated Urban Planning Area. 3. The following procedures shall be followed by the COUNTY and the CITY to notify one another of proposed development actions:, E a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the E proposal , hereinafter the originating agency, shall send by f 55 Page 4 ' first class mail a copy of the public hearing notice which identifies the proposed development action to the other agency, hereinafter the responding agency, at the earliest opportunity, but no less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the scheduled public hearing. The failure of the responding agency to receive a notice shall not invalidate an action if a;good faith attempt was made by the originating agency to notify the responding agency. b. The;agency receiving the notice may respond at its discre- tion. Comments may be submitted in written form or an oral response may be made at the public hearing. Lack of written k or oral response shall be considered "no objection" to the proposal . ; c. If received in a timely manner, the originating agency shall include or attach the comments to the written staff report and respond to any concerns addressed by the responding agency in such report or orally at the hearing. I d. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action. If, after such consideration, the originating agency acts contrary to the position of the responding agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate appeals body and procedures. C. Additional Coordination Requirements 1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall do the following to`notify one another of proposed actions which may affect the community, but are not subject to the notification and participation require- ments contained in subsections A and B above. a. The CITY or the COUNTY, whichever has jurisdiction over the proposed actions, hereinafter the originating agency, shall send by first class mail a copy of all public hearing agen- das which contain the proposed actions to the other agency, hereinafter the responding agency,.at the earliest oppor- tunity, but no less than three (3) days prior to the date of the scheduled public hearing. The failure of the responding € agency to receive an agenda shall not invalidate an action if a good faith attempt was made by the originating agency to notify the responding agency. b. The agency receiving the public hearing agenda may respond at its discretion. Comments may be submitted in written {; form or an oral response may be made at the public hearing. Lack of written or oral response shall be considered "no objection" to the proposal 56 i Page 5 c. Comments from the responding agency shall be given con- sideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action. if, after such consideration, the originating agency acts contrary to the position of the responding t, agency, the responding agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate appeals body and procedures. l III. Comprehensive Planning and DevelopmentP_ ol�es A. Active Planning Area 1, Definition : Active Plannin�Area means the incorporated area and certain unin- corporated areas contiguous to the ineorporated area for which the planning and seeks tssibl CITY conducts comprehensivee. The CITY- development activities to the greatest extent po Active Planning Area is designated as Area A on Exhibit "A". 2. The CITY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning within the Active Planning Area. 3. The CITY is responsible for the a,prequiredprts by adoptioOAR nland with@nd ment of the public facility p the Active Planning Area. 4. The COUNTY shall whichwouldc�eatedlotsdivisions thanwithin 10 acres Active size, Planning Area v�hic service are available to _.unless public sewer and water s property.` 5. The COUNTY shall not approve not dor,ent inorthe be conditionedi�o Area if the proposal wouldprovide provide for, an enforceable pian for redevelopment to urban densities consistent CTYlas indicatedebyive thePlan CITY'n the future Comprehensive upon annexation to thea CI Plan. 6. Approval of the development actions in the Active Planning Area shall be contingent upon provision of adequate urban services including sewer, water, storm drainage, streets, and police and fire protection. 7. The COUNTY shall not oppose annexation to the CITY within the CITY's Active Planning Area. 57 Page 6 B. Area of Interest 1. Definition Area of Interest or Primary Area of Interest means unincorporated lands contiguous to-t a Active Panning Area in which the CITY does not conductcomprehensive planning but in which the CITY does maintain an interest in comprehensive planning and development actions by the COUNTY because of potential impacts on the CITY Active Planning Area. The CITY Area of Interest within the Urban Planning Area is designated as Area B on Exhibit "A". 2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and development actions within the Area of Interest. 3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation,` adoption and amend- ment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-11 within the Area of Interest. 4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject to,the-following: a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of Interest as' a condition to the provision of urban services for development. a b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. c. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other repre- sentative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest.- Not contrary to the fore- going, the CITY reserves all of its rights to annex and acknowledges the rights of individual property owners to annex to the CITY pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes, d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CITY plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY designations. . Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation`for one,year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation is,outdated and an arrmendment may be initiated before the one year period is over. 58 f I 1 i Page 7 j r 5. The City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard have reached .an agreement on, a South Beaverton-North Tigard boundaryestablishing future annexation areas of interest. This boundary coincides with the northern Urban Planning Area boundary shown on Exhibit "A". Washington County recognizes that the future annexation area of interest boundary line may change in the future upon mutual agreement of both cities. I C. Special Policies 1. The CITY and the COUNTY shall provide information of comprehensive planning,and development actions to their respective recognized Community Planning Organizations (CPO) through the notice proce- dures outlined in section;III of this Agreement. 2. At least one copy of any COUNTY ordinance which proposes to (1) amend the COUNTY comprehensive plan, (2) adopt a new plan, or (3) amendthetext of the COUNTY development code shall be mailed to the CITY within five (5) days after its introduction. 3. At least one copy of any COUNTY ordinance which proposes to rezone land within one (1) mile of the corporate limits of the CITY shall be mailed to the CITY within five (5) days after its introduction. 4. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County.have agreed to the following stipulations,regarding the connection of f Murray Boulevard from O1d,Scholls Ferry Road to the intersection of SW 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street: a. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County agree to amend their'respective comprehensive plans to reflect the following functional classification and design considerations: 1. Designation: Collector 2. Number of Travel Lanes: 2 (plus turn lanes at major intersections) 3. Bike Lanes: Yes 4. Right-of-Way: 60 feet (plus slope easements where necessary) 5. Pavement Width: 40 foot minimum w 59 i P age 8 E 6. Access: Limited 7. Design Speed: 35 M.P.H. 8. MinimumTurning Radius: 350 to 500 feet 9. Parking Facilities: None provided on street 10. Upon verification of need by traffic analysis, the connec- tion may be planned to eventually accommodate additional lanes at the Murray/Old Scholls Ferry and Murray/New Scholls Ferry intersections. 11. The intersection of SW 135th Avenue and the Murray Boulevard connection will be designed with Murray Boulevard as a through street with 135th Avenue terminating at the Murray connection with a `°T" intersection. heMurray12. The general alignment oft M Boulevard connection is illustrated in Exhibit B. b. Any changes .to land use designations in the Murray Boulevard connection area shall .be coordinated with all jurisdictions to assure that traffic impacts are adequately analyzed. c. The City of Tigard, City of Beaverton and Washington County shall support improvements to the regional transportation system as outlined in the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). d. Improvements to SW Gaarde Street between SW 121st Avenue and occur Murray Boulevard the r d fromlWalnut/135thcident AvenuewtohGaardeoStreet.n of Murray e. The City of Tigard and Washington County, with involvement by affected property owners, shall jointly develop an alignment for the connection of Murray Boulevard between the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street and 121st Avenue/Gaarde Street intersec- tions in 1986. 5. The CITY and the COUNTY shall informally establish administrative procedures and designate appropriate personnel to receive and review notices required by Sections II A, B and C of this Agreement. 60 f P' Page 9 Tv'. Amendments to the Urban P1 anni ng Area Agreement A. The following procedures shall be followed by the CITY and the COUNTY t to amend the language of this agreement or the Urban Planning Area Boundary: 1. The CITY or COUNTY, whichever jurisdiction originates the iI proposal , shall ;submit a formal request for amendment to the responding agency. 2. The formal request shall contain the following: a. A statement describing the amendment. b. A statement of findingsindicating why the proposed amendment is necessary. c. If the request is to amend the planning area boundary, a map which clearly indicates the proposed change and surrounding area. ori inatin 3. Upon receipt of a request for amendmentfromthe g 9 agency, the responding agency shall schedule a review of the request before the appropriate reviewing body, with said review to be held within 45 days of the date the request is received. 4. The CITY and the COUNTY shall make good faith efforts to resolve requests to amend this agreement. Upon completion of the review, the reviewing body may approve the request, deny the request, or make a determination that the proposed amendment warrants additional review. If it is determined that additional review is necessary, .the following procedures shall be followed. by the CITY and COUNTY: a. If inconsistencies noted by both parties cannot be resolved in the review process as outlined in Section III (3), the CITY and the COUNTY may agree to initiate'a joint study. Such a study shall commence within 90 days of the date it is determined that a proposed amendment creates an inconsistency, and shall be completed within 90 days 'of said date. Methodologies and procedures regulating the conduct of the joint study shall be mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the COUNTY prior to commencing the study. b. Upon completion of the joint study, the study and the recommendations drawn from it shall be included within the record of the review. The agency considering' the proposed amendment `shall give careful consideration to the study prior to making a final decision. 61 Page 10 B. Prior to August 30, 1986 the parties will mutually study the following topics: Urban services provision by the County and City; the possibility of Tigard assuming active plan responsibility for a portion of the Metzger-Progress Planning Arega as shown as an area of interest on Exhibit A; and the possible removal of a portion of Section III B.4.d., which now requires the City to maintain County plan designations for one year after the effective date of annexation. Proposed revisions to this agreement shall be considered by the partiesasdata is available as soon as possible after September 1, 1986. C. The parties will jointly review this Agreement every two (2) years, or more frequently if mutually needed, to evaluate the effectiveness of the processes set forth herein and to make any necessary,amendments. The review process shall commence two (2) years from the date of } execution and shall be completed within 60 days. Both parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any inconsistencies that may have developed since the previous review. If, after completion of,the 60 day review period inconsistencies still remain, either party may terminate this Agreement. V. This Urban Planning Area Agreement repeals and replaces the Urban Planning Area Agreement,dated September 26.,:1983, Washington County-Resolution and Order No. 84-73, and City of Tigard Resolution 84-19B. This Agreement commences on 9 19 � IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Urban Planning Area Agreement on the date set opposite their signatures. CITY OF TIGARD Bye --/ Date Mayor W HINGTON COUNTY By ,-° Date -q-$ll� airman; Board or CountfyVommisFioners Date 9r r Recording Secretary 62 Al 9 i 1 •+�� M f ' L.''1• ��/ sl Wil/— 'V!J \ ____ t irI.. t 'r �itf '� •d " r t. n I IF 441, GIL -'� '.:L.. ' ' ♦ 1 �' •j am h `' 'L �; � -•i 1.".t��s". t � 1 ,' Wim. !� ��1 � _ ^♦� ILLI tu LU JIM LU �M z 0 —,� � ®. J •� .. a Z ro W, :�. i' W n !� m e a i I v z a CC a z ~ \ a < a o in w f� v . mJIM \ ca 0 63 - r to l y y Oft 3 r r• t � .r 4 t \■ 5 � 1 k b 1+- �� • v 1 F v d Y t � _ / t �x � 5 1 F+ ( k #a£ MURRAY BLVD.CONNECTION a t Y (I t � i� St{ f rt 33f 3i 1� Y� } 1 1 a T 4�y a 7t t''J� ��y j✓i,� 4:z l t 3 ; S tl1 � ''t�.//�`�h e f�li:rL1?N7�tJx Xr{". 1 a} 1 d�' ��ftt a. j r � � 47 Y �i f a•a;- *[,t tY � rl v r i^ V fs FE G d `r K. • �Y �i - - � - ivy±✓!� - Ii 4 e Y� �vr X 5�t � v Ma tp M� ,r�Rti�tir k�'l e; i t � ' tt VON,-s�- 3qr 4�b� r IY � .�., ti � S3i4-. i 1.�:_ r�` d•5-.1 :,.' s{r t "_:Y nn �4�..�4at l`"'3 fav �1�h;� .{•'CKa ' ';,FYt s�+�,.a�lr ai''i kc�i fil I�� in Y�x�s�y�{1's"1• •. �.Z,A.:.....-� AGREEMENT (TIGARD) da of `!'I-II$ AGR,.LEhiLNT made and entered Ln:a as or tris. u:'c r 19?0a between the CITY OF `PJCGAi�D, a aaun cipOcity al co:- reinaiter referred poration of IEDState of'SEWERAGE AGE&CYas �OFeW,lSHI:OTON COUNTY, a.9municipal tPcor- and the UNIF poration and county service district, hereinafter roferred to as the " � yti , Ar..nc i VITN I.SSE t'H: WHEREAS, the Agency was duly formed and o.:,aniLed under CaaPta:r' 451 ORS for the purpose of providing sewerage treau►nent facilities within its boundaries; and � WHEREAS, City is within the Agency by action of its Caunci' u1d pursuant to an election duly conducted within the boundaries of Agency; and 4 WHEREAS, City has and does; v.;n and operate: certain seUeraga facilities 11ithin the Agency; and F WHEREAS, Agency has developed a master plan for.the imslteW?tntaion o tion of sewerage facilities within the Agency and is in a p. coordinate and unify treatment facilities into an integratec�.oe7er^ge s system for the areas within the Agency; and A have the authority to enter Into 1onQ Agency WHEREAS, City and B Y range contracts for the cooperative operation of service'facili�.i�s under ORS 451.560 and Chapter 190 ORS; and WHEREAS, It would be in the best interest of the Agency and City to`enter into an agreement which provides for the 'operation and-owner- so erstep of certain sewerage ge facilities and other pertinent matters relating thereto; NO.4, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the I covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the parties harato, it is covenanted and agreed as follow: Section 1• Definition of Terms• A. Wherever the following terms are-used in this agreement, $ they shall have the following meaning unless otherwise i specifically indicated by the context in which t-hzy appe2M: 1. "CONNECTION CHARGE" means an amount of money charged for connecting to the sanitary ue:aer system. . 2. "FINANCING REPORT" means Financlng Plan Unified Setaerape A enc Washington Co_ltunt Oregon, armed February, 1!1[u, by Bartle We 11s ssoc9�1t3s. 3. "INDUSTRIAL WASTES" means any liquid, gaseous, radio- active.or solid waste substance or a combination thereof resulting from any process of industrial or manufacturing business, or from the development or recovery of natural resources. �,. "OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE" means the regular perfin- ante of work required,to assure coTltin�. { i ' R 66 of the sanitary seweraga sybtem and corrective measures taken to repair facilities to.keep them In operating condition. 5. "ORDER" means Resolutions, Orders and Directives of the Agency prescribing standards and conditions of uae of sanitary sewerage facilities 'and"ratea and charges therefor. 6. "PERMIT APPLICATIO.J AND INSPECTION FEE" means fees ;charged an applicant for permits and related inspections for connections to the sanitary sewerage system. 7. "PERSON" means the state, any individual, public or private corporation,--political subdivision, govern- mental agency,,-municipality, industry, copartna-ship, •- association, firm, trust, estate or any other legal entity whatsoever. 8. "SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM" means any combination of sewage treatment plant, pumping, or lift 'facilities, 1� sewerpipe, force mains, laterals, manholes, sale ; sewers, laboratory facilities and equipment, and any other facilities for the collection, conveyance, treatment and disposal of sanitary sewage comprising the total publicy-owned sanitary sewerage:system within Agency' jurisdiction, to which storm, aurfsce and ground waters are not intentionally admitted. 9. "SEWER SERVICE CHARGE" means a regular charge to a property owner or occupant -of designated premises for the use of the sanitary sewerage• system. 10. "SPECIAL AUDIT" means a financial review of the actual -costs, federal grants, sewer bonded indebtedness, and'other pertinentdata relating to a determination of the amount payable to the City for the acquisition by the Agency of designated properties as described in this agreement. 11. "STANDARDS" means the standards and conditions of use p of the sanitary sewerage -system as specified by the Agency. Section 2. ®peratinE Procedures and Relationshius. .A'. The City agrees to: 1. Enforce the standards, rules and regulations govern- ing the use of the sanitary sewerage system as pro- mulgated by the Agency, and to notify Agency of violations requiring Agency legal action. 2. Obtain Agency review and approval of any permit application for industrial waste discharge. _3. Obtain Agency review and approval of plans and speci- fications for any addition, modification or recon- struction (other than repairs) of the publicy-owned sanitary sewerage system prior to undertaking wort: thereon. 67 I i Agency review and approval prior 4• (Obtain to en;sr.- ing into any agreement for. the use ox' the sareita:^y sewerage system. to initiat- 5• Obtain Agency review and agraeuviental pgorrthe fin3ttcing } ing ®r.ent-ering into any to the sanl- or incurring of indebtedneas relating, tary sewerage system. E 6. Establish in its records a separate account for the i n purpose of accounting for nneto t sagse Ment••1 collected by the City pursua 7• Use City revenues, exclusive of payments recaived pul-suant to section 5 hereof, arising from this agreement for sewerage-related purposes Only. 8. Allow the Agency access at any reasonable tlme upon reasonable notice to inspect and test sewerage [ facilities within the City. 9• Grant the Agency permits from time to time as may ble necessary for the installation of sewerage facilities withOut in the public streets and ways provided tof the hat 'the ' imposing permit is fees, p , Agency shall adhere.to any condition required pus-- suant to §451-550(7) ORS. 10. Take such curative or remedial action•asand when ny- necessary to maintain that portion. of the p o.jned sanitary se-rerage system under the jurisdiction of the City in accordance witto budgetary Agency tiotas � standards, subject, however, etary be lawfullymit and to the extent that the City racy authorized to act'. Sect i__.on•3• Ov�rershin oP Facilities. sfer assign and set over to the A. The City does hereby tran , and to Agency all ofpthe City's ent anderstcollecLip �ion1 f.cililtiesdw within certain sewage City, including 1. Treatment plants and appurtenances: 2. sewage collecting trunk and.interceptox limes of 24-inch or greater diameter. ui ment and supplies as set forth on the attached 3• Eghibit A by reference made a part hereof. rights-Of-way and permits held by the 4. Easements, rig 11111 and 11211 but City with respect to the foregoing subject to she termsshallpbevboundsandVconfur to dndl of which the Agency shall save, hold harmless and indemnify the City from any failure to conform thereto. erves to. itself al S. The City hereby excepts and ae hereilncbo eystated, land res .or interest in land, except h TGt i 68 i i including lands utilized in connection with treatment plants; treatment facilities; provided, however, that s the city does hereby grant to the Agency consent for 1 the non-exclusive use of such lands as may be necessary to enable the Agency to own, operate and maintain such E facilities during continuance of this agreement. C. In consideration of the obligations of theCity under ! this section, the Agency shall compensate the City in accordance with Section 5 of this agreement.. i l Section 4. Administration is eration and Maintenance of � Sewerage 'Facili es. • k„ A. City and Agency agree that: 1. City will 'continue to operate and maintain the treatment plant and other facilities until the use of the_facilities are, in the discretion of the Agency, no longer required. E' { 2. City will process permit applications, make inspec- tions of connections to the sanitary sewerage system, collect, account and-record connection foes, inspection fees, and sewer service charges within the;purview of this agreement, in accordance with the orders of the`Agency. City will remit to the Agency.on a monthly basis, with a report on Agency-designated forms, the -fol- lowing amounts: Forty (40%) per cent of all permit and inspection fees. '' su ,>,,, b; Thirty (30%) per cent of all sewer service charges collected. " c. Eighty (80%) per cent of all connection charges collected. A. City will, diligently maintain regular billings and collection of fees, Mdjusl.. complaints thereto, and -pursue delinquency follow-ups and tack, reasonable steps for collection thereof. 5. Agency may at any reasonable time upon reasonable notice .inspect and audit the books and records of- the City with respect to matters within the purview of this agreement. 6. The City and the Agency nay each need extra help from t9.me to time that might be supplied by the other. In such a case, eithzr City or the Agency in u411iz- ing .the services of an employee of the other, shall pay the lending government as follozla: thr•, employee'. salary rate currently in effect for the time worked plus twenty-five (25N) per cent thereof. Pav 11 ff 69 f r Section 5. Connensation. t►. The Agency agrees to compensate the City for the acquisi- tion of its sewerage facilitlos as identifiod in s Exhibit "A" attariad hereto and incorporated herein, the total amount of $ 536,849.00' . , payable in the E manner following: 1. The swa of $70,00.0., paid to the City upon execution of this agreement, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. 2. Pre-existing general obligation sewerage facility bonds: As partial payment due the City, the Agency hereby agrees to pay to the City., or as City may direct, not less than ten (10) days prior to due date, P.• sum sufficient to enable the City to pay principal and interest on`all,general obligation bonda of -the City according to the amortization schedule of each issue as and when same fall due, with respect to sewerage facilities of the City, including those' set forth in'Exhibit "All. Compensation to the -City from the Agency-for prin- cipal sumsrequired'for bonded debt service only shall be applied in reduction of the deferred balance of Agency's obligations hereunder, interest payments 'on bonded debts hereundershallconstitute interest due the.City on that portion of the deferred'balance of the Agency's obligations hereunder represented . by the City's .bonded indebtedness as herein defined. E 3. The balance of the Agency's obligations to the City > for transfer of the facilities hereunder shall be paid by the Agency to the City in annual install- ments, each not less than$14,442,45 e�Laa ., 1 • interest on deferred balance at-the •rate of five (570 per cent per annum from �Ju_�y 1. 1970 until paid., the first payment to-be ma ice on or before July _l, 1972'and a like payment on or before July of each' calendar year thereafter. section 6. Other Provisions. A., The City and the Agency further agree that: 1. The Agency will not extend services to areas outnide the City and outside existing sanitary districts except with the prior approval of the City where use of City facilities is•necessary to serve such area, or whare•nuch areas are contiguous to or in the near vicinity of the City's boundaries. 2. The installation and construction, and the financin-g, thereof, of server lines and facilities having a diameter of less than 24 Inches are deemed to be within the jurisdiction and control of the City, unless othansise agreed to by the Agency. Such Page 5 AMMEri1M4'1' { 70' € installaction and construction shall be -made in accordance with this agreement. Agency will not establish local assessment districts as providyd by Chapter 451:ORS. 3. The City and the Agency trill each obtain such insur- ance contracts as necessary to cover the'liabilities of the City and the Agency respectively fon the risks and limits set forth in §30.260 et seq OItS, and each of the parties hereto shall cause the other to be named as co-insured on the policy of the other consistent with the obligations of each of the par- ties under the terms of this contract. 4. At such time as the *Agency shall discontinua opera- tion or use of any facilities on-City-owned preru.ses, the Agency shall remove such equipment, facilities or fixtures therefrom for a period 'of—six (6) months after such discontinuance or such 'facilities shall become City property, provided that to the extent the Agency 'shall demolish or remove facilities, the sites thereof shall be left free and clear of all residue and debris and in good order and condition. This agreement shall be effective upon its execution by both forties hereto and shall continue in effect for a tein of thirty (30) years from and after the date hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed in dupli- cate pursuant to resolutions heretofore duly and legally'adopted by each of the parties signatory hereto. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY t},F,p}s Y AS TO p nl OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON By county coueiycl for Cha/3 , Board of Gounty ommiss onerss _ W:abing:ou County,Or�� of Washington County, as the governing body of the Unified Sewerage Agency. .' APP^Q�ED '�:�,•:!-i::'C:�'(:?1 C'JUl`:iv CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE.ry l cu ux U. ri�r.uinNvMayor /Z By . Iiecor er f F'i„r G A0.11 N ADDENDA 1. Page 5. Section 5-A2i following the comjglete paragraph ending with the words "set forth in Exhibit,'A`°, add °'payments will commence on or before July,1, 1972 in accordance with the amortization schedule :shown in Exhibit !B'." 2. Page 5, Section 5-A3; following the end of the paragraea, add "Such payments tobemade over a period not to exceed twenty years." 3. page 6, Section 6-A-4; the latter section of which reads, "the sites thereof shall be left free:and clear of all residue and-debris and In good order and coeds-- tion to read, "the sites 'thereof shall be left free and clear of all demolition waste and debAs." M 01 i ` 72. E7ffiJLB�'A''e0r�" i' A-1 Treatment Plant and Apppurtenane:aa (a) Alain Lift Station:.Two 10 H.p. motors and pumps, Structure, piping, values and control cqui^:zuent. 4 (})) Control Building:. Buildi-19 stractnre, boiler, c:outrol -.0ne , flow recorder, sludge painp, closets hot Crater beatgx, 31nip nt;mp, re- circulation pump, piping, valve'a area items.: (c) Grit Channel: Structure, gate3 and flow teetering equipment. f (d) Primary Digester: Strcicture, piping .and valves. ' t (e) Secondary Digester: Structure, piping, valves and supar- natant controls. ' (f) Primazy Clarifier: Structure, valves, piping, drive mechanism, and rwtor. (g) Diversion Structure: Structiure, piping and valves. (h) Secondary Clarifiers structure, valves; piping, drive mechanism and motor. (i) Activated Sludge Basin: Structures, piping, valvea, tmo aerators, and two 10 YI.P. eff?uent _rumps. (;j) Aerobic Digestion Basin: Structures, piping, t=all, .' contact basin, and one aerator. orine & Equipment Bldg.: Structure, chlorine e:quiprent, (k) C3sl . hoisting equipment, wztete sludge a1mU, control panel, scales and fixed equi.e"aent„ (1) Recirculation Pump Station: 3tvo 711 H.P. sub:reraibls rOciz- culation pumps and related control e-Cpip- rient. (ta) Filter Pimp Station: Tao 73s 11.P. pu,, and rotors, Otruct:u:c piping, valves, control oquipment, sump pump, and washdown PIMP. (n) Hock Filters: Tiro rock filters, structure3, piping, rod%' valve3, and distribution system. 73 I f (o) final Clarifier: 'T'o clarix"ic:r structu_�+x, Za3:i:e�j, vnla2 drive nechaniama ana z::ators, (p) old Chlorine Contact Tan2c: Structure only. j c•, (q) Yard Piping & Eliscellaneous: All underground utilities between Structure or related utilitic�c, diversion boxes, stand pipe, Waste bu cat's, conductu, val-:v3, rjnnh les and riaterxret equipment. A-'L Smdcir. Lines 24" or greater (a) 24" Interceptor (City of Tigaxd) 5 A-3 :Zunp Stations (a) Durnham Street Pump Station (City) (b) ronitn Street Pump Station (City) 4 ( Page 2 - Exhibit "A" 74 N, still � t d Exhibit "A" f A',1END-MENT TO CONTRACT Dotuaem `he City of Tigard and the Cra4fied S-z!:rer'age 7y Q;ac y of ,;asyington Coir ty, Oregon Dabsd saps ,^:ober 8, 1970 IT aS itGM-., D bat-iJcen the CXTY OP MARJ and the -AGENcy OIC' uASH!NaV -!ON COUNTY, 01200% that in oun s..4i&rattan of tel=: :7.2 Taal b..:neri.t3 to b2 attained ie-Mounder, Paragraph j of r SeC`alcn 6 of ap,11 : contract be, end,the came Is hereby, amend-ad 4a read A4 i°HADD sa• .?,. The Cloy and the Agency will o.ach obt d n such e 1 h.� 1 1 n 0 'b el in�ti_:tYU. GOntJ.':iCtn• t.9 iaeG(:`39;try to COl..l ��1:.xC . poctiv3 liabilities arising out of thin agr;,iment mnd each of the parties hereto nhall pro iia writton CVidenCe of such inSur an0a for limita o, liability not leas than those set forth in ORS 30.270. Such insurance contracts ; 3ha11',provide :or at least 30 days 'written rsow-ce to be given the other party in the event , of Camallafioh." X:t ?i 0::?aY,` r p'a-ets saki agreement beaIlzq; date cof S;'pt"mii^ be-a L; 1910 bt.-, r.:cI tba a-xii: is hereby, 'ratlfi#--d a-ad c;onfir;.1ec?. .1:138 MI, t:hiss instrum-unt has boar e:toeut:ed In s;r,j4Cti`;2' pursuant to rezoluUom :sereto;iore duly" and le&&!y j4dop,,4d iyy e.sch of the pn tica ai.gnato-ey hereto. 0:� L11l8iil��l'O'i tJLyl;ry, 0'.i 1acN 1105 :} of ti:)`d7:y is;1;P4T.'.=•.ra:ii+):'!t:':; of Va311LIgton Count;, a.:s th.114, -:,On9rn+- body Gi the U:airied sowerac,i f Te ncy GAITC; Lar By 75 sum ._.._._ . awr.�^s...e.,:.u:r.uen«iGli?•::1.w:•�C.RvtJt++i7:+r.%a1 N+wr.•:,1[. AGREEMENT %°+> USA R&O 72-9 ,.T.. an l �nea into ::i_ I ,, day 7 .GZ._:L ., a OS .7ile^.11r�:,.. Z9!?, .L......._e`L :+'.U'1 'it, se-,I:n.� P1t71.' a7S :11 a1.:d71C:a�tOP1 cou:jty, a • ' ' i roroorat(.-< ::1 u=sL lIg ORS Chapter •:�1 Count • Servii e District, ,. _era`�t.r rc_+.:raL to as . ..g,n•y". _a�.3 ,'.:= City of Tigard, a ..^._cipalJcorporation n th-! Stat•.: o°.Oregon, '�'re.tn after referred to a J..."City", :1IViZSS"ET*! tsuS.RF:AS, ;nP_;u;,nt to thecunt a a: ty and Ageney, dated etrr�rr 8, 1970, City does o-)-.!r-3t(_- t treatment plant and other facilities for sewerage t eata_nt within the City limits of City; WHEREAS, City is desirous of g n':y •.1sz.I ' ba: operation and maintenance responsibility of the plant which formerly belonged to City; and WHEREAS it would be in the nest antereat oo Av•Nncy a:.a City to agree to Agency assuming the operation and res )onsibility of said sewerage treatment'plant,'with the appropriate Chany-e, o:. revenue distribution,by City; NOW,THCREFORE, in consideration of the nrt :i:•� 1 oi t:re covenants atrl agreements to be kept and performed by the oarties hereto, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: Sectiop 4. 1. of that contract between City and Agency, dated I� A "r 8, 1970, concerning purchase of sewerage facilities by Agency and the distribution of maintenance: and operational responsibilities between Agency-and City, be, and hereby is, deleted in its entirety from said agreement, and the following language shall be inserted in its place: , "Effective February 1 1972 and thereafter, the Agency shall;operate and maintain the treatment plant and pump stations. The City shall cont.; ue to operate and maintain all other facilities of the collection system. Agency shall operate and maintain the treatment plant until, in the sole discretion of the-Agency, the use of said treatment plant is no longer required." Y. 2. Section 4. A. 3. b. of the above described contract, dated December 8, 1970, be, and hereby is, deleted in its entirety from said agreement, and that the following language shall be inserted in its place: "Seventy percent (70%) of all sewer service charges collected." 3. The remainder of said agreement, dated 139GemLe� 8, 1970, and each part thereof, be, and hereby is, ratified, readopted, and continued in full force and effect byand between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed in duplicate pursuant to resolutions heretofore duly and legally adopted by each of the parties signatory hereto. CITY 01GARD, OREGON UNI. SEWERAGE AGENCY 0�6AASI NGI N COUNTY, OREGON i/1•,i tiayor C�d rman, Board of County Camm'ssioners o Washington County, Oregon ., HY /i`'/:.,,; `/•/•r f ti� the governing bodv of thA to„f;rr: \\\�. 76 'J t . .-._-�—�. -. ... .:. _.._ _....:t:_. __:�. "--^--z�s�'*'S"-^�::r'?:�'-�Ri�^:%�M:,'=+lstit'.,; _ -.rwm"'^�?_^.rr .- .Y.a�w.:..vsa•, Q - - - - fff,4f O�f!�rir��➢��1��f��iRrjalr�r�r�r1T tirJr{7�T�7i77iir�tjm of►jrl+ alffr; rlr3 ' ' 6 ►'WJ1E: IF THIS MICROFILNEQ .__-- �c DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 1w, THIS NOTICE. IT IS dlE TOTHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINALDRAWING. ._.-----sz sz , Liz az sz raez zz Iz oz sr er to s► sr Vii.__e!_ z _-.off__.o16 ® L9sbZ !' ANIL YMNiIN1NEdNNIN1!GllINHHNIl�r1 rL-t. %7. ff ...A... J....I I....I....I I... I jamp""M MA"" Oan: �•---4 .,,.:._gym...F ....�- .-. ,,.. ... Ly - moi, IMMMAKAit "m AWSaamOL JIK SYSTEIF +...c TaiiGC:1GG�AL S7SiF]II z•. � _ F1c 3`Li$tGiIEE�Mat iTSiEii ,`' �----� •— r x Y 1. Piilll� ... �q,� 1- ten t (Cpri\�+' w,..9 I � 1 ,....1E IN I - i 11 iFi IIIf1111111111TtT17111 11 II 11111111 � � � � `•�� - '_ �1 I t 1 1 1 t.as I. 1. I t l t o mrr� rti .,..�._.—..._._._ :.,_•__•_ :,:. .,.-..�-�. Y I I I- 1 I I ( I. I I i_.IT"A"',�iml L.PI_ 1'ln I 1 1 I.�11 n'I�111 1 rtl 111 111 Itl II141111111 PIgiI1111i 111gg11111 t1111111Ig1u11111� - _ ::�` ,..^..ri; NOTE: IF TNISMICWCLEFIUEO - 2 3 4 _ $ 6 ] B B 1t O SS AR MMINOTIiQ.EIT IS OOE 10 i.it TE QUALITY OF TE MIGOtAL J.J 16,6111.,hu, DWIW -_ _ ,IOE 82 BE 22 92 S2Yt E2 R IZ 02 6t 91LI- 91 Lf1.1 -CI_ tI- -II 01-6 --Y (--9 --y Y--- E y { •,, +IIGm6ndunLudnuGwlllMluutilpl, -- ��1990 I 4 /IICr 3LwARC+'SAC* cm 6 i 3E Eii77a.6QC11� b ac x s a»k �r-ecgr �=.ar -woar. w r B -- >tiEy6 TE�+w-iSJob,, t+cadr,alrE S:.nasE Z1.T. all r -r 220 'c IBNR<< �orrT.fa ettarfat sa spa Ifu�reee rr� 1 _ t scar as L.0" x ' R f - -- -- Y - L � L• ' —= 1` g routes ---»Routes ogrammed or under construction I REGIONAL ----Proposed routes(no funds BICYCLE identified) ___ Corridors(specific routes to be T___ j UJ N ®Rlt determined) j August 1983 j. ISO 01.119011-ml .I F 11 111 1Jill 11 I 1 101E: l - 1 f i.. l i.. 1. i�lnlj i P.f 1?t9�1.1!_jl f tf ITITT�IIIIpmN11IIf1111111I11T il�lillg4t(r V14'flp11p11lllllligrpptry111 '._- - TMM MIMFI E 2 3 4 _ 5 8 7 8 8 O II .... 1 OfV/Yw IG IEGG CIE TX,W THIS NGTI(Z,n Is W ITV pF TIE - OE 82 BZ 2 BZ SZ ►2--Ey R 12 OZ BI BI CI_.9t_..-Sr -YI .B�.—Z1_ .;�__Ot-8_.8.. t__9S._..f.-._E 2 la-- �_ .. •�MIGIIIIIIitlllllutlllll � _ b MARCH 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Copy Holders of the February 16, 1988 Bull Mountain/Walnut Area Urban Services Study (Daft Final) FROM: Cathy Wheatley, Deputy Recorder SUBJECT: Proposed Tigard Park System Attached, for your information, is a copy of a map of the proposed Tigard Park System. ow Attachment i y L11 CITYOF "IIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: DATE: SUBMITTED: February 4, 1908 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Eligibility to PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A _ Acquire Federal and State S_ur•p•lus _ Property _ "PREPARED BY: Wayne Lowry, Fin. Director DEPT HEAD OK_ CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED EC3 FtY POLICY ISSUE Shall designated City employees be authorized to represent the City of Tigard in the purchase of Federal and State surplus property? INFORMATION_SUMMARY The State Department of General Services, Purchasing Division, is 'authorized to acquire, warehouse and distribute surplus property to all eligible agencies in the state. In order to become eligible, the governing board must pass a resolution designating its authorized representatives and file such resolution and an application with the State. W `ALTERNATIVES CONSIDC'RED 1. Approve attached resolution and submit: application. ` 2. Do nothing. - --•. ____....._�_..._...._____....._...�.._ FISCAL IMPACT Substantial savings may be realized by the purchase of surplus property. SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Staff recommends approval of resolution. cn/3061D r J.. F Department of General Services 6 PURCHASING DIVISION NEILGOLDSCHMIor DISTRIBUTION.CENTER,1655 SALEM INDUSTRIAL DR.,.NE.,SALEM,OREGON 97310 GOVERNOR January 4, 1988 CJity of Tiagard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Attention: Neen Valenza The Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended 1949, through Section 203, and consistent with Public Law No. 94-519, releases Federal Surplus Property through the federal General Services Administration to the States and local organizations for public purposes. The Department of General Services, State of Oregon is authorized by ORS_ 279.820 to ,acquire, warehouse, and distribute surplus property to all eligible donees in the State and enter into cooperative agreements. Accordingly, please find enclosed the basic application forms inviting your application and petition for eligibility, acquisition and use, of a broad spectrum of available property. In these times of severe economic crunch and budget constraints for capital investment, we feel we can provide partial solution for cost effective use of those precious dollars. When the Oregon eligibility documents are complete, we will develop the interstate cooperative agreement with the State of California State Agency for Surplus Property on your behalf. Should you require further information or assistance in the completion of the application package, please contact me at 378-4714. Sincerely yours, Kenneth R. Jones, Manager, State/Federal Surplus Property KRJ:rc Enclosures fedapp3 awplib/memosl oC'J fi ® ® ®pneations A. Instructions Applicable Only to Certain Specified Applicants 1. If the applicant is a school, college, or university lacking evidence of formal approval or accred- itation, the following type of information may be accepted in lieu thereof: a letter from a school district governing board or the State Board of Education or similar authority stating that the in- stitution meets the academic or instructional standards prescribed for public schools,colleges,or universities in the state or that students will be accepted for transfer to accredited or approved institutions at the same academic level;OR a minimum of three letters from accredited or ap- proved`institutions to the effect that students from the applicant institution have been and are accepted as if coming from an accredited or approved institution. ;t. If the applicant is a school for the mentally or physically handicapped, the application must in- clude a copy of a certificate or other evidence that the facility meets the state and local health and safety standards. (sive data on length of school day, week, and year and the number and qualifications of staff. 3. If the applicant is an educational radio or educational television station, the application must be accompanied by a copy of the FCC license to operate exclusively for noncommercial educational purposes. 4. If the applicant is a private, nonprofit library,the application must include a statement from the governing body that the library serves free all residents of the community. 5. If the applicant is a medical institution lacking evidence of formal approval, accreditation, or licensing, the application must include a letter from a city, county, state, or federal health au- thority stating that the institution is approved by that authority. A licensing authority will be accepted as evidence of approval only when the licensing authority prescribes the medical re- quirements and standards for the professional and technical services of the institution. R. Instructions Applicable to All Applicants 1. Public Law 94-519 mandates that surplus personal property be distributed in a fair and equit- able manner based on the relative needs and resources of interested eligible agencies and orga- nizations and their abilities to utilize the property. To assist the state agency in complying with this requirement, enclose a statement with the application providing information relating to the following: a. Source of funds, such as tax revenues, federal or state grants, tuition or service charges, and donations or contributions b. Economic condition of the agency or organization, including any extraordinary economic problems c. Availability of funds and facilities to repair or renovate the property and maintain the prop- erty in use d. General description of the nature and types of property needed for use in the program or activities t f _w ,i i J Dept.of General Services APPLICATION FOR ELIGIBILITY Federal Surplus Property FEDERAL PROPERTY UTILIZATION PROGRAM 1655 Salem Industrial Dr.N.E. UNDER P.L. 94-519 Executive No. Salem,OR 973 i0 376.4714 Legal Name of Applicant: CITY OF TIGARD Mailing Address: P 0 Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd, yip Code 97223 Location: Tigard, Oregon County Washington Phone:(503) 639-4171 1. Application is made: a. as a Public Agency , b• as a Nonprofit Educational or Public Health Institution (attach copy of Tax- exempt determination under Section 501,of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954) 2. E.pplicant is a: (See definitions) 1. __Child Care Center a. State Agency g• School for the alllyly FYandicappedpped m. Hospital b. X Local Government c. School h. Educational Radio n. Health Center Station o, Clinic d. College e. University i Educational TV Station p. Other(Specify): f. School for the 7• Library Mentally Retarded k, Museum S. Source of funds: a. X Taxes or Public Funds b. Grants and/or Contributions C. Other (Describe) 4. Applicant is: a. Accredited b. Approved c. Licensed (Attach documentary evidence substantiating Approval or Licensing) 5. When not obvious from institution's name,attach a narrative to provide: a. If a 1PubHo Agency,details of public program functions,activities,and/or facilities. b. If Nonprofit Edi details to include grades taught, enrollment, length of school day, weeks, and Year; number and qualifications of full-time and part-time staff, and facilities operated or program conducted. c, 19 Nonprofit Public Health, details of services offered, number of beds where applicable, number of resident physicians, number of,registered nurses, other professional staff,and facilities operated,or programs conducted. Date Signed Title ' (JACally Authorized Official Attachments: (As required) 1. Assurance of Compliance with Nondiscrimination 2. Authorization of participants S. Narrative program description(if required) 4. IRS determination (if nonprofit under Section 501 of IRS Code) S. Evidence of approval, accreditation or licensing(if required) FOR STATE AGENCY USE 1. Applicant is approved as a: Public Agency Nonprofit Educational Institution Nonprofit Public health Institution 2. Applicant is not approved Comment: Date - , AUTHORIZATION OF PARTICIPANTS RESOLUTION "BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board,OR by the Chief Administrative Officer of those organza- tions which do not have a governing board, and hereby ordered that the official(s) and/or employees) whose name(s), titles) and signature(s) is (are) listed below shall be and is (are) hereby authorized as our representative(s) to acquire federal surplus property from the Oregon State Agency for Surplus Property sander the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side of this form." NAME TITLE SIGNATURE (Print or type) Wayne Lowry Finance Director 3i.11 MonZey Community Services Director_ Bob Jean City Administrator Cliff Scott Operations Manager Loreen R. Wilson City Recorder PASSED AND ADOPTED thisQ�21)d-day of�� —� 19.0L, by the Governing Board Of -Ahe a-ko Of E al-d .0 h o c4 l�.�u Ork ,-i� of the Governing Board of .�EC.i��i �'S CU __ dohg�'eby certify that the foregoing is a full,true and correct copy of tx�`resolution adopted by the Board at a�A UTL-meeting thereof held at its regular place of meeting at the'date and by the vote above stated,whiclAtesolution is on file in the office of the !� Board. *see att.0xfjed R.Q Lt-Lc{-i b n f t CITY OF TIGARD NO 6-7-1b , Name of organization 13125 SW Hall Blvd mailing address Tigard . WA 97223 City County ZIP Code (Legally Authorized Official) OR AUTHORIZED this day of , 19 , by: Name of chief administrative officer Title t Name of organization Mailing address j [Signed] City ^County ZIP Code (Legally Authorized Official) ASSURANCE OF (COMPLIANCE WITH GSA REGULATIONS UNDER TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTSACT OF 1964, SECTION"606 OE TITLE VI OF THE FEDERAL PROPERTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ACT OF 1949, AS AMENDED, SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED, TITLE IX OF THE EDUCATION AMEND- MENTS OF 1972,AS AMENDED,AND SECTION 303 OF THE AGE DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1975. CITY OF TIGARD (hereinafter called the "donee") (Name of donee) HEREBY AGREES THAT the program:for or in connection with which any property is donated to the donee will be conducted in compliance with,and the donee will comply with and will require any other person (any legal entity) who through contractual or other arrangements with the donee is authorized to provide services or benefits under said program to comply with,all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the General t_'arvices Administration (41 CFR 101-6.2) issued under the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 606 of Title VI of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as r amended,Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended,Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as mended, and Section 303 of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, to the end that no perso> hee United States shall on the ground of race, color,national origin,sex, or age, or that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall solely by reason of the handicap,be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of,or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the donee received Federal assistance from the General Services Administration; and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.' # The donee further agrees that this agreement shall be subject in all respects to the provisions of said regulations; that this agreement shall obligate the donee for the period during which it retains ownership of possession of any such property; that the United States shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this agreement; and,this agreement shall be binding upon any successor in interest of the donee and the word"donee"as used herein_includes any such successor in interest. CITY OF TIGARD Dated Doge BY Bob Jean, City Administrator (Preaident/Ctuirman of the Board or comparable authorial officW) 13125 SW Hall Blvd P 0 Box 23397 ' o. Tigard, OR97223 IAmee Mailing Addreax �. s -r 64.12.5•FSP01 i y, s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY f AGENDA OF: February 22, 1988 DATE SUBMITTED: February 10 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Computer PREVIOUS ACTION: Budget Committee Equipment Request January 12 1988 _ PREPARED BY: Wane Lowry Fina DEPT 'HEAD OK CITY'ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Bob Jean/Bruce Olson POLICY ISSUE Shall City Councilauthorize the appropriation of contingency for additional computer equipment? INFORMATION SUMMARY See attached memo. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve resolution for the appropriation of contingency. 2. Revise request and alter the appropriation accordingly. 3. Do nothing. FISCAL IMPACT 1. Reduces contingency in the following funds: Current Appropriation Balance General $192,335 $12,077 $180,258 Sewer 243,993 3,723 240,270 Storm Drainage 3,228 1,635 1,593 State Gas Tax 56,487 1,891 54,596 County Gas Tax 48,298 374 47,924 'Total $19,700 SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Staff recommends approval of recommendation. ht/3154D CITY OF TIGARD,"OREGON 'i MEMORANDUM • TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council February 8, 1988 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator i SUBJECT: COMPUTER SYSTEM NEEDS i At the Supplemental Budget review the Budget Committee "put the $25,000 if Computer Systems request into Contigency for Council consideration after i further review by the new Computer• Systems Manager•. Bruce Olson, the Computer• Systems Manager, has reviewed the Computer• Users Committee's request and has ; revised it considerably. What Bruce found is that our current Burroughs "smart terminals" (the B-20 and i B-25 personal computers) can be reassigned where only those terminals will work, but that less expensive IBM-PC type clones-can be purchased to meet our immediate ,needs in Community Services* and Community Development. Bruce's approach increases current and future systems applications at an evenlower € cost than the narrower and more expensive original request. Police needs have, been pulled out of this request for further study and will be addressed in the 1988-89 Budget workshops. Department and Description Committee Request Revised Request Police: Software $ 5,000 ? General Government:Software Licensing 0 $ 3,500 (allows PC emulation for 25 XT or AT units) Community Services: o Bancr•of-t assessment billings and collections software $ 2,000 $ 2,000 o Accounting Manager workstation 2,800 (B25) 2,000 (AT) o Court/Records workstation r and software 0 3,400 o Court records software 1,500 0 (IPM) o Personnel records workstation 2,800 1,400 (XT) o Hardware and ser•vi.ces 800 1,000 $ 91900 $ 91800 Community Development: o PW Operations Modems $ 1,500 (B) $ 500 o Development Services workstation 2,800 (825) 1,400 (XT) o Engineering CIP design software 5,000 5,000 o Hardware and services 800 500 $10,100 $ 7,400 o Pavement Management System $11,000 $10,000 (Approved by Budget Committee) 5 i 4 Page two Honorable Mayor and City Council February; 8, 1988 Setting aside police needs for further review, the Computer Users Committee's request and the Computer Systems Manager's revised request is as follows: Department Original Request Revised Request General Government 0 $ 3,500 Community Services $ 9,900 91800 Community Development 10,100 7,400 Pavement Management SYstem 11-'000 10,000 TOTAL $31,000 $30,700 Recommendation: Staff supports the Computer Systems Manager's revised recommendation ($30;700 needed, less $11,000 already authorized = $19,700 r requested appropriation). Council motion to approve $19,700 Contingency appropriation for the recommended 'computer hardware and software purchases. Approve attached Resolution. BJ:mh3ll4D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 88- 4 A resolution of the Tigard City"Council appropriating contingency for computer system hardware and software: k WHEREAS, a request from the computer- users group for additional computer equipment was submitted to the Budget-Committee `on January 12, 1988, for f inclusion in the 1987-88 supplemental budget; and K WHEREAS, the Budget Committee denied its inclusion and directed _staff to I resubmit a`computer equipment request, after review and revision by the newly j hired Computer Systems Manager; and j f WHEREAS, such a request has been reviewed and revised by the Computer Systems Manager and submitted to City Council. t NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1 Contingency is to be appropriated as follows: j i a , General Fund City Wide,Support ' $ 12,077 Contingency (12,077) Sewer Fund City Wide Support 3,723 Contingency (3,723) Storm Drainage City Wide Support 1,635 Contingency (1,635) State Gas Tax City Wide Support 11891 Contingency (1,891) County Gas Tax City Wide Support 374 Contingency (374) PASSED: This day of 1988. r ATTEST: Mayor, - City of Tigard S t City Recorder = City of Tigard APPR D AS FORM: � t e ,i y Recorder Date F RESOLUTION NO. 88- lw/3154D CITY OF _TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY , AGENDA OF: February,22, 1988 - DATE SUBMITTED: February 10 :1988 ISSUE/AGENDA 'r]TLE: Training Request: PREVIOUS ACTION: None _ 1988 ACSM-ASPRS Conventionr March 12-16, 1988 PREPARED BY: Development Services M ' DEPT BEAU OK C CITY ADMTN OK REQUESTED BY Development Seruxces Mc7r. POLICY ISSUE Council approval is required of any training plan that is over $500 or, 500 miles from the City and was riot specifically identified in the current FY adopted budget. INFORMATION SUMMARY 9 The City currently sponsors my membership shi p � with ACSM (American Con ress on Surveying and. Mapping) because of it's < xr•cpct relationship with lob duties arid professional status. The ACSM organization has proven to be a valuable resource in evaluating and implementing new surveying/mapping methods and practices. Of late, ACSM has focused more on geographic and mapping information systems. In fact, 'ACSM and URISA (Urban and Regional Information 9 Systems Assoc.) have become the leading resource for' regional, county and municipal governments when researching ' geographic and mapping information systems. Because of the City's 'continued growthand need to develop , system--wide plans and improvements (i.e., transportation, drainage, sewer, � etc.), I feel it is important: for us to maximize our mapping information � resources. This Convention and it's training sessions shiould provide staff with the opportunity to improve it's efforts ' with our current mapping information system Funds for, this or- a similar training plan were budgeted in Development Services this year, however,' the specific training plan was riot identified in the budget document because it was riot known at that time. ALTERNATIVES_CONSIDERED 1. Approve the Development Services Manager request to attend the 1988 ACSM-ASPRS` Convention in St. Louis, MO from March 12-16, 1988, at an � estimated cost of $980. 2. Deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT Sufficient funds ($1,300) were budgeted under travel arid training within the Development Services Division budget to accommodate this or a similar training plan. SUGGESTED AC1'I0N I Staff recommends that Council approve the request to send the Development Services Manager to the 1988 ACSM-ASPRS Convention. � ht/3132D RD CITYOFTIVA EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other ' formsofeither training or education. Documentation. is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file DATE OF REQllEST- / Requested by: Vendor No.: (ly X p] Em loyee request attend ( ` PAYABLE TO: 1 88 AGSM_AgPR9 .o vention [ [ ] Employer required attend For check run of _ [ j Mail check [ ' J Notify dept. when ready X Vendor No.: (2) Vendor PAYABLE TO: Randy_s. C�arn� PAYABLE TO: • s zzaacaaa-�acaaaa: - oaea c..=aarao _m—�aaaca?�aaaaa aaa �_ _- � /�mar Cr r i ei v p �^rammetr Title of Program Amer�c n C n reaG on cnrvPv,na y , Institution or organization& o• T gsi_ Registration Deadline 2/26/6a _ Training Dates From:_7� 3 16 88 Describe the purpose: lb rive training in the follawing areas: '1) Mkp� infarnaticn mange nt systms. 2) Hto COMTHnate ming efforts with other: agencies urAWU-rj p: vane utilities 3)G99�c Infetnaticn systgn design and dwelcp nt �. .to sat star ~ds., Gaining]aZawleclge in thane arms, especially in this cular' forun, sho d result In tore and r1aW saving l e is with tk�Citys g .. ,tm*ping i 4m nw aga�t system, -Icuns this related to X ) current posataon [ J reasonable promotion or transfer? Explains TRAINING COSTS: [X J to be advanced [ ] to be reimbursed after attendance Account-No. Amount 10 � 2To $160.00 1) Registration or tuition......................... Books.............a............................. 00 Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)•••• � -- 325.00 2) Lodging......:.................................. Per Diem................................ �'1�"-- 35.00 2) Other: Total s _ ac=aac_=d=o.-aaaasac=ca.aoaaca=ec=a aacaa==asa�aaa:aaaa=aoea=tea.'^----c- [.. Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, / may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures' made on my b f. Date 2- Employee Signature: z Lam -^ (624 625) E Appropriation balancet1r300 _Managers ] approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Nead: [ J approved { ] isapproved (explain): F Finance Director' �_ RECEIVED FEB 2 1988 Advance Registration 11988 ACSM•ASPRS March 13-March 18,1988 ANNUAL CONVENTION Cervantes Convention Center i St.Louis,MO t Please complete this form and return to ADVANCE REGISTRATION COORDINATOR,1988 ACSM•ASPRS CONVENTION,210 LITTLE FALLS STREET,FALLS CHURCH,VIRGINIA 22046 (703)241.2446.Please type or print information and check appropriate boxes. _ I PAYMENT Make checks payable to: 1968 AGSM-ASPRS CONVENTION Payment must be made in U.S Funds drawn on a U S bank } VISA,MASTERCARD are also accepted. (other payments will be returned) i DEADLINE:Payments must be received prior to February 12,1988 to receive advance registration rates Typed Job Function , Business REGISTRANT Randy $ �`�arn0 t ❑Government t ❑Owner First Randy (Last) ClarnO _ Agency 2 Q(Manager NAME TO APPEAR ON BADGE (First) 2❑Surveying 3❑Researcher COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION City of Tigard, Oregon Firm 4❑Operations 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. 3❑Engineering 5❑Educator STREET ADDRESS ngineenng 6[1 Other � CITY,STATE.ZIP(Postal Code) Tigard, OR 97223 Firm 639-4171 Home(503 639-9234` 4❑Firm Cartographic } TELEPHONE Office(503 ) HmFirm Purchasing � COUNTRY USA 5❑Equipment Authority ManufaI IX Recommend MEMBERSHIP STATUS:(please check all that a Photogcturer i 6❑Ptatogram 1 meth Firm 2❑Authorize 1 ASPRS 6 ACSM y 3❑Specify 2 ❑Primary Data Acquisition American Cartographic Association 10 ❑Non-Member 7❑Oil Company 4❑NIA 3❑Photogrammetric Applications 8 American Association for Geodetic Surveying 11 ❑Student 8❑Software Appy ❑ 9❑Hardware 4 ❑Remote Sensing Applications 9[g National Society of Professional Surveyors 12 ❑AGU 10❑Other 5❑ Professional Practice Is this the first ACSM-ASPRS Convention that you have attended? [g Yes ❑No ) t ) REGISTRATION FEES Rates apply to registrations received Rates apply to registration received BEFORE February 12,1988 AFTER February 12,1988 Member Nonmember Member Nonmember Fee ) FULL REGISTRATION(Package). (A) $165.00 (1) $240.00 r"Hvalaw ae,i retxuary 12.19ee Includes exhibits,proceedings,sessions,t ticket to Icebreaker and t 160.00 ticket to Banquet WEEKLY REGISTRATION (g) $110.00 (J) $19000 (0) $16000 (X) $240.00 $ } Includes exhibits,sessions,proceedings,but no social functions - DAILY REGISTRATION(check) (C) Days tr (K) Days n, (R) Days c (Y) Days 0 $tlay Monday_Tuesday_.Wednesday_Thursday_Friday S4c 0000 day 575.00 day $60 00 day 890.00 Includes dailytechnical sessions and exhibits,bul no proceedings or social functions ENLISTED MILITARY PERSONNEL ; (D) S 20.00 (L) $ 30.00 (S) $ 20.00 (Z) $30.00 $ t Includes sessions.exhibits,proceedings.but no social lunctions - STUDENT(School) (E) $ 15.00 (M) $ 2000. (T) $ 15.00 (AA) $20.00 $ Includes sessions.exhibits,proceedings,but no social functions - SPEAKER(Session or Paper) (F) $ 15.00 (N) $ 20.00 (U) $ 15.00 (BB) $ 20.00 $ Includes sessions,exhibits,proceedhgs.but no social functions GUEST PROGRAM(Name) (G) $ 30.00 (0) $ 30.00 (V) $ 30.00 (CC) $ 30.00 $ - IncUcles In-House Activities, spitality.but does not include:Icebreaker, - Banquet or burs OTHER PROCEEDINGS ONLY (H) $40.00 (P) $60.00 (W) $ 4000 (DD) $60.00 $ ADDITIONAL SOCIAL FUNCTION TICKETS(rote descriptions on social page) - (A) MONDAY NIGHT ICEBREAKER COCKTAIL PARTY Tickets(u$20.00 each $ March 14,1988 - (B) GALA PRESIDENTS'COCKTAIL PARTY,BANQUET AND DANCE Tickets 0,$55.00 each $ March 16,1988 TOTAI.FEE MUST BE ENCLOSED $ 160.00 y Enclosed in rrry check,or please charge my VISA MASTERCARD CANCELLATION POLICY Account# 100%refund it written cancellation is received by ACSM/ASPRS in the amount d$_ Expiration Data Convention Registration Coordinator before February 5,1986,50% Name appearing on card refund if written cancellation is received no later than February 26. 1988.No refunds will be given alter February 26,1988. Autlxxized Signature I_ i s�• c $ g E g $ 9 LLi9a E E ^ i I O� po u N E A• C y R6 qq t p E E ¢ _ Y®0 yYt QE Sw agl - k ao I NUi -.� qty"-Q Z NhZ �UOV U171i r N �� rr � t s,tif �1��:��'ih, �t r €49xiht`f �,tt,,�tU,�.slr��ti�t t f.ic 1 ^'G`,+# � �5 '� ✓ r r r ��6 1 �,r'f�..Y. � �{� � � r�n.t a�}��rr� �•/v ltiy�•`f�p+ � I�� 'St r U� a,1r S?•� (r- y l � s '; •*TF �� 6 i� "� p °� 'ar�"v � u � •fF 1 ;:1t}4y r •� 3J r d Yvr'•t,T'A ilT�. �t�C s � gig ji x��, �� ?��•slk' ,�! 't i� r"t .� fir o �, ,nts `�4 ver �R �r E'' 'M" r (r. "� ,, .} r, y •;rt c tic { �yL•t� '� i1�7. Lnev��l�.ytx �,p 4 1 : . rtt /Llr g, •( #.tGt''te lB �r,8tgg, �, •A�.r. tgr�6,ili�thi`t�: �W �#tr �e� �:�sri�i t n .-,' �',.L 5 .x•)t:r ,. ';:L .: _�rs:�-ie'43, t� s,'""R.-= 5 �=.�,.,?-�.u=.,�.:.i.Lv" ,f=;..� �?--s.-�. a �h4T. -k x vNA } t t�r * � M J,! _ 4Y • yY � �j f-E".I x �j tpjP� c y � M: r [ r [ eft �✓�}T �.J[ 4 �,+t t .r"Ssi}�. ; r i � f�2�cKt�tf4 •. ¥ F d , if. c F C' ,�yp`;' 4 W�a�JrzY� * '. �< ;r fa� "f��"�'t}x"-• �Y�'� � r�� 9ry ��L.{�� r �,y-."Y��L+.2 t nA' w It f yY 1 �`"} w- Y rt t r a . 'z ^�, aFP Py�_'u1•�4etE �`3t'? 'y,,,�u rsiz k.; t�'� s Y ti 1 x� ,,x S-&d•�` �} :q�'#� �'l4��y S�� Z .i�Y''Or�`��s ,�.�r F15. ,4� K I�'tnf ry ' �ii}�� dn,c^i 4' 4 r 7{.Z �°a;. �a„"' y�F••xy' 1`'t. iSFi;p"7ty,x•71YW�"r7'i- ai��S+AI'i+x" 'Yitry"'�. 1 v✓ x�'L1`,�[p ai•33'E.�sir�> -`'��.�;� ��'��F ?yl9t�Y•[t '�' �r� �° �'� ��# �� f t�ae ;rr-zea x'tf}f�`�*-�n� � •�` ,.'�'4`i!"i'.� ''�><fi' {i M 1T'L"is'+Y E �tf f i1 til �'i rt'' �.+^�.�Fu� -! rte'" .yxwi R11, , g1 `� t Y -•s 9s ��'t', r y' e -s :t{-a4 4F Msl? 't �,. �' _ .! v v r t4 S a y l'"'f"•.! .'tt'ru" 7 /,[�)Z3` - (ri�r.u•t-s Y� y, ..� rt T r�� R t �y 7� { FI�t�*nb 7 i• 2 'Y1'1' }�� a!�:4 i i -. a: 12 [ y[r '#S}�'i �rn �p{��S �i3 rah. s�„"i'y�rf n'i'}ri.✓�ia3�'9rw� � It.1_tr.az. ��SK i'ki �,.�.�,.�-.�� 4, :3.�i��d'i`.X 'la��'.}w'�•.t Jltl�ids»Ila..,[ �'Y4'`9W5"AS� GS�•y-�. y { U a yf 4 i l y-1 CC� yy5 3 r }4: ZE4 Ch1;y -'Rt ct f:t `•7yP iF 1 4 .t-. .� .i.S i"._....,.-.,, t ..1,.•.�£. .4,.1'.. ...., ...x,..t`„{.....-..z .2.,,,, >� .6:'.:. .+,s',�,„Y r„L�,3,4. Y i r i.t; 4 '�: ..r} , '3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON C_OUNC_IL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 22;_1988 ~__ DATE SUBMITTED: February 1 _1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Mc0onald_Street PREVIOUS ACTION: Bikeway Funding Fl eemgji __— _ PREPARED 13Y: Randall R. Woole �� DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADOK _ REQUESTED BY OLICY ISSUE s Shall the City accept State funding for, bikeway improvements on McDonald Street? E INFORMATION SUMMARY f We have been successful in obtaining State bikeway funding to construct shoulder bikeway improvements along both sides of McDonald Street between pacific Highway and SW 98th Avenue, McDonald Street qualified for the funding because it is on the regional bike route system. The estimated project cost is $31,000, The State will pay 80'Y of the costs up to a maximum of $24,800. If the Council wishes to accept this State funding, it is necessary to approve a resolution author-izingexecution of the attached -agreement. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the resolution authorizing execution of the funding agreement. 2. Request changes to the agreement. t 3. Reject the funding offer-. FISCAL_ IMPACT Approximately $6,200 matching money from the City's Streets CIP Fund (to be budgeted in FY 88-89) SUGGESTED ACTION Approval of the attached resolution. br•/2958D 4' 4 F Department of Transportation � ;�,; N HIGHWAY DIVISION NEIL GOLDSCHMIDT Region I GOVERNOR V 9002 SE McLOUGHLIN, MILWAUKIE,OREGON 97222 PHONE 653-3090 January 25, 1988 In Reply Refer To. File i RANDALL WOOLEY, City Engineer CON 8 City of Tigard' P.O. Box 23397 Tigard', OR 97223 Subject: Proposed Agreement Project Name: Pacific Hwy.-98th Ave. Funding: State Bikeway City: Tigard Attached are three bound copies and one ,unbound information copy of a proposed agreement covering responsibilities related to the planned bikeway improvements on McDonald Street Would you please review this with your staff and with other affected City personnel, and if it is satisfactory, arrange for an ordinance- or ' resolution authorizing execution by the proper City officials. The bound, signed copies should be returned to me at this _office along with a copy of the authorizing document. You may retain the information copy. Following final action by the Highway Division, you will be sent a fully executed copy for your records. Initial State deposit not to be made prior to July 1, 1988 I If you have any questions, please call me at 653-3229. WAY�E SCHULTE Federal Aid Specialist WS:p0 p � Ick c Q cc: Ed Marges - MC&A #9293 Attachments fl D-r � e" L 734-1850(1-87) MORIM Approved: OSHD Staff EDM:me 1/11/88 Misc. Contracts & Agreements No. 9293 CONSTRUCTION-FINANCE AGREEMENT BIKEWAYPROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division,,hereinafter referred to as "State", and the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, acting by and through its ll City Officials, hereinafter referred to as "City WITNESSETH RECITALS , g. By the authority granted in ORS 366.514, not less than one percent ` of fundsreceived from the State Highway Trust Fund will be expended by the State and the various counties and cities for the establishment of footpaths and bicycle trails. The establishment and maintenance of such footpaths and bicycle trails are for highway, road and street purposes. 2. By the authority granted in ORS 366.775, State and City may enter into agreements for theconstructionand maintenance of bicycle -pedestrain trails with the allocation of costs on terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the contracting parties. 3. Under such authority, State and City plan and propose to construct the Pacific Highway - 98th Avenue Section of the McDonald Street bikeway, hereinafter referred to as "project". The location of the project is approximately as shown on the sketch map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof. 4. State and City have determined that actual total cost of the bikeway project, estimated to be $31,000, shall be shared approximately 80 percent by State and 20 percent by City. In no event shall the State participation exceed the total sum of $24,800 or 80 percent of the actual total cost, whichever is the lesser. NOW, THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the fore- going RECITALS, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: STATE OBLIGATIONS 1. State's Bicycle Program Manager shall review and concur in all plans and specifications prepared by the City, and shall process all billings submitted by the City. 2. State shall assign a liaison person from its appropriate Region Office to monitor progress of the project and to assure substantial compliance with the plans and specifications. The liaison person shall review and concur in the final construction and shall review and approve all billings submitted by the City. f 3. Upon receipt of an acceptable copy of the construction plans and r specifications and notification that the City is prepared to proceed with the work', the State shall deposit with the City the sum of $12,400, such amount being equal to 50 percent of the agreed maximum State share of the project costs. Said deposit shall not be made prior"to July 1, 1988. 'Upon completion of the project and receipt from the City of an itemized r statement of the actual total cost of the bikeway project, the State shall deposit with the City a final payment of $12,400, or the remainder of 80 . percent of the actual total cost of the bikeway project, whichever is the lesser. Yn no event shall participation by the State exceed the total sum of $24,800. CITY OBLIGATIONS 1. City or its consultant shall conduct the necessary field surveys, f prepare the plans and contract documents, advertise for bid proposals, award all contracts and supervise construction of the project. Actual ; construction of the bikeway project may be accomplished by City forces, by contract or by any combination of these methods, as City shall elect. 2. City shall submit two sets of plans and specifications to State's Bicycle Program Manager for State review and concurrence prior to any construction. The bikeway design shall be based on the American "Guide for I` ns ortation Officials Manual 1 Gu and Tra ,,. Association of State Highway P � s supplemented and adopted Development of New Bicycle Facilities, 1981", a by the State. All signing and marking shall be in conformance with the Federal Highway Administration's "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" as supplemented and adopted by the State. 3. City shall by October 1, 1988, enter into a contract for construction of the project with a private contractor, or commence actual construction if the project is to be accomplished by the use of City forces. City_shall complete construction of the project within one calendar year from initiation of contract or commencement of construction. �. 4. City shall notify the State Bicycle Program Manager, 200 Transportation Building, Salem, Oregon 97310, phone: 378-3432, prior to proceeding with construction of the project. -2- 1 1 4 , submit to State'sro'ect 5. City shall, upon completion of the project, f liaison person, an itemized statement of costs of the final actual total cost of the bikeway portion of the project. 6. City shall, upon completion of the project, thereafter maintain and operate thebikewayat itsowncost and expense, and in a manner satisfactory to State. 7. City shall adopt a resolution authorizing its designated City f Officials to enter into and execute this agreement, and the same shall be attached hereto and become a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written. City has acted in this matter pursuant to Resolution No. U-12- , adopted by its City Council of the cQoDnd day of 1988. f This project was approved by the Oregon Transportation Commission on December 15, 1987, as a=part of the'F.Y. 1989 Bicycle Program. At that time the State Highway Engineer was authorized and directed to sign the necessary agreements for and on behalf of the Commission. APPROVAL RECOMMENDED STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Transportation, By Highway Division Region Engineer By State. Highway Engineer [ Date APPROVED AS TO CITY OF TIGARD, by and through I LEGAL SUFFICIENCY its City Officials ¢ By By 'G City Attorney Mayor By /� Recorder.wpailj s f -3- w»w t _�// ii II!' 1L'I1C 11 fl' '\\B"°°�"•^+'// 31 w �I,.a.. ..li ..mil �' _ LSI ** \ ° /��f • L� � c 710 rrr arx x'+♦» �e DE_-. °acor �.- RK ! < > sc /� w, cr j TIGARE-1 �x 4,. pxnaR P°V 18090 I 7 IBFRTn 4i r >pnxER ST $ TA�e, \J 1— • o ,e� tj uaosa cc b 9 ---� • o eM�� (�.4* J � r .4°� �0.�- ..wr.ex.v.ae... I I _ "II i l«r BLVp ia. /.f i _ �I 5 ^ x� 4 5, s r—e PROJECT c. KING CITY Pop 1.060: °! ��. O k•r>< �C n. J +,o ' ".. R q .`M•_4. CC 3 K n --"`- 57Cd J 1. C-',"w B11 t-5 LA CITY OF TIIGARD, OREGON GotI__•_NCTL_AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY a AGENDA OF: Fet>rcaar-y—22 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: February 5, � "` _~ PREVIOUS AC'T'ION: -- ISSUE/AGENDA "TITLE: 1987-II8 � y supplemental PREPARED BY: Wayne LowryFinance Di. DEPT FiEAD OK� CIT R TIV OK RLQUF,ILD BY: Budget Cammittee -- - _ - - - _ POLICY TISSUE E Local Law r•equir•es' that a Supplemental Budget; be adopted by the ' Governing Board by resolutian after a public hearing; INFORMATION Sl1MMARY udget at a The Tigard Budget Committee discussedgs he 1,F�zPoBu �J tlrrCon iuttee lemental Bapprov d a ,. pub'l.kc. meeting held January SupplemenLal Budget with cerl.ain' revisions and reconnneridcad that it be adapted by City Council, Since the Budget Committee recammendatian, revenue in the amount of `$10,566 is now artci`p tic�herDurham Tr eratment,Plantto be sgr`ounds.conIt is with U.S.A. for, the maintenanceI within the City Council's auLhor•itY to include this revenue anti the relai:ed � the Supplemental in Budget without republishing and Holding a second hearing: We have submitted two resolutions for- consideration. Resolution "A" reflects the Supplemental Budget as recommended by the Budget Committee. Resolution £s "B" reflects the Committee's recommendation and the inclusion of 410,566 as a General Fund resource and as "an apprapriation in the Commun:�i;y Development _ Program for- park/grounds maintenance, r ALTERNATIVES CONSTDERED t 1. Adopt original Budget Committee r•ecommendeci supplemental budget Resolution "A." round maintenance of the Durham Plant included, : 2, Adopt Resolution "B" with g ..___._.._�..--•__.... ____._.__.._._._._._.__._..__._ FISCAL_IMPACT 1• Resolution "A" increases resources and appr•opr•:iati.ons by $825,850. L. Resolution "B" increases resources and appr•opr•iations by $836,416. Note: The USA contract revenue must be included in a supplemental budget in . order to be appopriated. 5UGGESTED ACTION 1, Staff recommends adaption of Resolution "B" which includes the newly anticipated revenuer ht/3073D +' j 1 kv CT.TY OF TI.GARD, OREGON f•,! (f" 11# RESOLUTION N0. 88--.�a.- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR 1987-88 AND MAILING APPROPRIATIONS. — Public meeting on Jan�.iary 12, WHEREAS, the Tigard Budget Committee held a rand 1988, to discuss a 'proposed supplemental Budget', WHEREAS, the Budget Committee, has submitted a supplemental budget recogni.zing audited begirina.ng ,fund balat7c revenue roestimate�riadjustments, experiditure " car•r•yover's from 1986-87, and additional app ' CaLions; and WHEREAS, the Budget Committee recommendation is included herein; WHEREAS, the City is negotiating ama ntera�r ce of ct with th je UDurha�n Tr•eatmrent Agency Plan in which the City will provide grounds. The estimated revenue to be r•ecei.ved 'upon approval ut the contract is $10,566 through the end of the 1987-88 fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Budget for 1987-88 in the amount of $836,416 Section 1: The Supplemental is hereby.adopted, . Section 2: 1987--88 Appropriations ar•e to be adjusted as follows: Revised TotalRevised 1987-88 Budget Fund/Pro ram Budget: Supplemental GENERAL $3 090,846 ($16,145) $3,074,701 Community Services 35,083 1,077,938 1,042,855 Community Development 0 101,7001g1,7g0 Policy and Administration101,700 43,570 466,615 City-Wide Suppor , t 262,009 1,454,035 Capital Projects/All Other 1. 192 026 Total Appr•opr•iations $5,850,472 $324,517 `. 6,174,989 SEWER $121,000 $ 15,675 $136,675 Community Services 28,555 343,059 Development 314,504 0 30,400 Community 30,400 Policy and Administration 23,530 145,630 City-Wide Supp or•t 122,100 72r- 939 625,046 3 Capital Projects/All Other _-___��..- ].04,89 $172,653 $1,385,703 Total Appropriations $1,213,050 ht/3073D } Total r Revised Revised 1987-86 Budget Fund/Pro d r am Btadget supplemental �_ STORM DRAINAGE $ 32,000 $ 0 $ 32,000 Community Services 8550 238,550 , 230,000 17;100 Community Development 17;100 0 Policy and Administration _ 6,930 64,230 57,300 258,72230 City-wide Support 35 372a Capital Projects/All Other 2.94 100 ��---Z $ 630,500 ($19,892) $610,608 Total Appropriations r , STATE TAX STREET $ 26,500 $,1,375 $ 27,875 Community Services 1.2,651 596,751 584;100 Community Development 19,000 '- 19,000 0 Policy and Administration 10,480 73,980 63,500 175,487 City--Wide Support 144,900 30,587 Capital Projects/All Other a Total Appropriations $838,000 $55,093 $893,093 � COUNTY GAS TAX $ 12,500 $ 1,375 $13,875 Community Services 551 66,251 Community Development 65,700 3,800 3' $Q0 0 t Policy and Administration 12,700 2,490 15,190 City-Wide Support 22 48,49f3 70,798 � .Capital. Projects/All other, 300 - _ Total Appropriations $117,000 $52,914 $169,914' COUNTY ROAD LEVY 0 $ 0 Community Services 1,516 67,219 65,703 Community Development 0 0 O policy and- Administration 0 0 0 City--Wide Support 44,468 61,765 Capital Projects/All other, 17J 297 Total Appropriations $83,000 $45,984 $128,984 , STREETS SDC $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Community Services 76,750 5,404 82,154 Community Development 0 0 0 0 Policy and Administration O 0 City-Wide Support 149,765 827,515 Capital Projects/All Other 677,750 Total Appropriations $754,500 $155,169 $909,669 PARKS $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Community Services 460 3,287 Community Development 2,827 0 0 _0 policy and Administration p 0 0 City--Wide Support118,173 35�6G0 15_ 3,033 Capital Projects/All Others $36,120 $157,120 Total Appropriations $121,000 'r Revised Total 1987-88 Revised'" Fund/Program _ Budget Supplemental Budget _ BOND DEBT 0 $ 0 Community Services $ 0 $ Community Development 0 0 0 Policy and Administration 0 0 0 City-Wide Support 0 0 0 Debt Service 260,500 0 260,500 Capital Projects/All Other 0 13,858 13,858 Total Appropriations $260,500 $13,858 $274,358 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 0 Community Services $ 0 $ 0 $ Community Development 0 0 0 Policy and Administration 0 0 0 City-Wide Support 0 0 0 Debt':Services 523,950 0 523,950 Capital Projects/All Other 4,100,000 0 4;100 000 Total Appropriations ° $4,623,950 $0 $4,623,950 TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET $14,491,972 $836,416 $15,328,388 PASSED; This day of 1988, ATTEST; Mayor — City of Tigard City Recorder — City of Tigard APPROVED AS TO FORM; .n i -y Recorder -I0-�$ Date ht/3073D c MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor' and City Council February 16, 1988 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator"" SUBJECT: Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Maintenance Contract Staff has reached tentative agreement with USA on grounds maintenance at their, Durham Plant. The contract pays us about $30,000 annually for a $25,000 direct cost. The $30,000 figure is -still cheaper than USA's 'cost. The "profit" from the contract will be used to help with parks maintenance City-wide. Formal contract approval by USA is set for early March, and for Council review and approval in late March. The appropriation authority for this under the Supplemental ' Budget will not be released administratively until formal contract approval by Council; cw/3222D 1 _i t 4 s t. CITY OF TIGARD v^ a 19B7-88 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET SUM)4AR'Y 1! PROF•OSED 1987-88 1987-BB' CITY BUDGET PROPOSED. ADOPTED COUNCIL COMMITTEE SUPPLEMENTAL F"r_ 'P.NUES BUDGET BUDGET, REVISIONS REVISIONS ----- ----- --- G ERAL FUND $ .0:0,190 $10.000 $2.040.190 TAXES 8,272 51.500 $747,272 OTHER AGENCIES 687:500 106.000 $766.000660.050 FEES AWD CHARGES 18I,500 27,000 4 .0B.500 FINESANDFORFEITURES 788.'510 14.790 $802,600 FRANCHISE FEES 159 0OD 10,000 6169.000 USE OF hIONEY/PROF' 96000 20,000 $116,000 . OTHER REVENUE --- ___--- ----- ----------- --- ----- 4 602,2tl0 8,272 2-9,290 4.849.762 SUBTOTAL 74.661 $1, �,14,661 BEGINNING FUND BAL 1,240,000 ------------ - 5.842,200) 8.272 1 951 _S.164.423 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 55.093 69.3.093 STATE GAS TAX' 838.000 52,914 169,914 COUNTY" GAS TAX 117,000 45,984 128,964 COUNTY"ROAD LEVY 83.000 754D0 1.,5;169 909.669 S STREETS SDC 754.500 6.120 157.120 PARKS SDC 1 111,050 172.653 1.385.703 SEWER FUND 0 -19.892 610,68 STORM DRAINAGE FUND 630.500 0 4.623.950 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 4,623,950 13,858 -74. :;58 BOND`DEBT FUND 260,500 ------ TC` L REVENUES 214,483.700 $8.272 $8.5,650 $15.317,822 PROGRAMS/DEPARTMENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES $0 $2.028.872 POLICE `s1.987,872 $41,000 0 6$680,834 COMMUNITY SERVICES 620,849 59.985 0 $119.640 640 09: MUNICIPAL COURT 11 ,0`000 280410+ 180 LIBRARY 377.950 + 0 0 645.600 tinraAL SERVICES 4.5,600 ._•.151,661 I30,985 - __280 ------------ 265,126 "TOTAL COMM SERV t' -. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10.450 6.800 '05,864 288,614 CD ADhIIN 254 _ 265,..3-- TTp 11.000. DS BUILDING '' � ^ 8.000 289.004 � DS PLANNING 257.781 23.223 199,791 38,700 21.100 259.591 DS ENGINEERING. 0 p 1^''.705 PW ADMIN & BUILD 122,705 0 0 10.3.950 PW SHOPS ✓ SERVICES 101.950 20,040 '_.18.544 29•B.504 0 PW WASTEWATER 0 13.777 611.750 0 PW STREETS & LIGHTS 598.003 1.487 187.872 L PW PARES & GROUNDS 186.385 -------- TOTAL COMM DEVELOP. --2 310,066 72.373 62,204 2.464.643 ' F•Ol(".Y & ADMINISTRATION 172,000 0 p 172.500 CITY WIDE SUPPORT 551.100 47.545 47,000 645.645 NON DEPARTMENTAL 80.000 0 40.000 120.000 CITY ATTORNEY _ ___ _ -_- ---------- --631.,1-0 -----47,545 -----87,000 765.645 TOTAL CITY WIDE ----- ----------- ------ --- pPERA7ING BUDGET 6.265.027 250.90.3 171.464 6.687.414 DEBT SF_RVICE 784.450 0 0 784.450 ALL OTHER 211.700 5.000 45,000 661.700 CIF'-GENERAL _14 CIP-OTHER 5.563.619 25,000 _---- J 6 _---- // .-, TOTAL CIF' - 5,775.319 --- -0,000 - 79.595 5.684,914 COhITINGENCY/RESERVES GENERAL OPERATING 1.000,000 -238.481 217,009 192.335 c 1.000,000 0 O 1.000,000 GENERAL RESERVE 445,097 -34. 150 357,762 -`-1768_709 OTHER FUNDS ---------r ----------- 1,961 TOTAL CONTINGENCY 1.658,904 272,631 --`-574,771 -----..044 TOl'AL 48 700 - -- 8-072 `--4825-850 $15.317.922 EXPENDITURES X14 I. N TO 00 I .40 r. K,a N`OQo CA ( `r, '0 Uip 0:.: 0 .9omO 1 V n t-11 :I- m O J-CA -10 V)O.P O N°1'm n 17 O 0 ( 7 I.'.-+ II N. 0 O.0 0 G' i... 00 rD.t�'_ .0 (:.� m.Fj O N.t� O.pi�.m 1 � A �.0 1 ^�.1..It 11 II _C' n,�'O h'O.'I P 4*m(9 i m OTO 0 I-N Bi N P P.PJ t,m-.:n 'AID :C7 U-3 O I N I.n II m,- .-.C N 0 N CJ O -+..m I �7 h 7t N I o`I m II 0j -0 •3 N r`,0;1 Ol O_�O 1 O'o r,.p-� 1 d- .-+ �0-+ I n I 'a 11 (., N''o n.+•-+..I tD _ to '- Lij s�''i ri i F? 1 ri 1 1 ' ri 1 vii E _ w it 0 000 ON r- I d' 00 10 I It II 0 ( O Z �c1 I I rA 000 d'hN I It ,O0 I O. I 't II 0 :.1 0 W D" I' I' _ 0 0 0 P h,O I n9 O 1 C l n it - V7 O 01401-0 C'J 11 0 CL z (fi W �� WIi i II ,, � v#c•�i"i c; U 1 0 1 O O O 0 0 1 0 0. I O t O 11 OOoU� 1 U) J CC f m I W 0 O O �0 I •D O l 0't '7 II O O P I P � w 1 N1 ,.J 1 � o ipi nii o oN 1n Q N ri a o i n 1 n I o n N cJ C-441 CJ I fP<I tPr II I ,7 Ill CL I'. 1 I l II ;x¢ - W 1 0 1 01 O II p 1 ID Ca-'W I I 'A I M I to :I i(i II ! t yp W 0 U ILL \(� OHJ v t='to tTj W I I 11 I II ('i c 0 00 ( -0 d ri 0 C+N 0 0 0 w I P O N O I N l 0 11 p O .-O t \. I t`1? a' 00 I.co -vo0 t40 Q' ONOOm I r O t0 I � I F9 II N O �-0( r \hi\ m4 1 mm �OPJJ I CO OthOct t� .U. .hj ( V' 0 '0O I I P II ^`rO Cis-1 ti m W l 1 1 1 U1.1 COOP r,U-) 1 rJ Q- y--�m CJr.0mmo I N N mO l m I N II OD �O .-.Pm0 i Ui n> 1 Nm ^• Od' I m o4Nm KlNOP 0)m I m n G.n m I n l II m> I 0-0 -• � 1 ra c•J w ra cv -+�rJ N-� ! Fa N 1 ,o I vin m ca �h.:� i W P W I ( I ( !R 1 II y. - I .-.s w (a CC N 1 0 Vi 0 I N 0 O 1 FiN I 1-1 i r. 11 0 0 0 1 O. O� J G Z 1 ❑m O i m N C! O n � I , I O II O O O 1 0 !- ..W O UZ W 1 O I >zI 1 ' O 0 tri Ui Ui I1 O 0 1 0 0 rim I Cd n I h l 0 II U i Cd C•J I O Z S' O U) i a'N Pi. i ri N II W0 CL O I 1A I ( ;Pr CL,1 U CL'7 I I tk I I I 1F1 II I X W 1 CJ Q• 0001 tb- -'+00 t-i n I •0 0 00 1 0 I n II O 0 F'i 0 1 P I h c!• O o I .-+I%,m 0. O Ui 0 0 m I m O 00 I O 1 (,A II N 0 't p h O l mN rl l N O r 1 0 Omqm �oP O - O 1:111 II 7 hPN - O I ri p I I F I n00` N0 I man Q• PJ F�mm �o I O C'J •�O I i N II 7 -�m-om0 I N n L ! m o-J n I u7 m N N o r•J p r r m l n �i m I Fi 1 m n m cJ m I I` m O I P.0 -+ti I �' CJ(11 N.+ ••+.+C•J N -+ I !!� N i •0 1 N II (� CJ ( w 1 ( u +n Cl I I .� II I Ui tR II I ( 1 I I n CL 0 — m m -1 0 (n m > Z W F mW F W Fca u W W F G,Ua Z W4 hW- F¢ 3 s- 1121 W •+F m U) u_ J> f. F U > (L W O 0 Cr J O N CC F F- CC .-a W O U F -jZ O W(L it Z O Z} T W W CFL 7 W O m W >~a4 ul W«m F Z CL W W !- C7 F- m�"#'•,u- CC m U > O > (A C7 IY F-. 0 .+ (iZ CL 111 x ri W Z Z W««2 m>s U F 7 1-CC U p W 'S :3 U U (y( m. } J W q . w 3F 4 (1J iC0 tri U CCW WrOW 4 1- Q: (D J Z4Z ZZmW W T -1 Q ¢F J .-� W FW *� T . h } fi > 2 T'-+JZ (1.F W Y ¢ W CLF Q C7 > xZmtLiCO (A FWZ '-A CLJ F. FZ 11 Z09)cr CL F- « 4.W 11 F Z iC W W QV-¢CL F- F UO UQa 0 �+ CJ OJZ OmQF-¢ O -0 0 «. W m0"3(D CL CL O Lr Z.z Ix. F. Z GL 17l o_W C CD 3 m CL. H > 3 } F F- m F.I I i I F OO HO F UO t-I tD N.m 33333 .i Y fZj ~ F H HH p i0C Gti.UZJ(('- O UG00ti.CL(LfL CL 0J NZU w W JuUUUJ CITY OF TIGARD 1987-SB SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY F'ROF'OSED 1967-66 , 1987-88 CITY BUDGET PROPOSED ADOPTED COUNCIL_ COMMITTEE SUP'P'LEMENTAL r_,.EVENUt'S . BUDGET` REVISIONS REVISIONS BUDGET ---------- .3F, - AL, FUND --- --- ----------- --- --- - --$10.000 $2.040 190 ,.-S $2.030.190 OTHER AGENCIES 587.500 8. 72 51.500; -$747,_.7^ FEES AND CHARGES 660,000 1106.000 $766.000` $P'08,500 FINES AND FORFEITURES 181.500 14.790 27,ODO $202.500 FRANCHISE FEES 788,010 USE OF`MONEY/PROP 159.000 10,000` $169.000 96.000 30 566 26,566 OTHER REVENUE ----------- SUBTOTAL 4.60 200 8,272 249.856 4,860.328 SUBTO BEGINNING FUND BAL 1.240,000 74,661 $1,314.661 ---- ----- -------- ------------ ----------- TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5,642.200 - 324.517 6.174,'989 STATE GAS 'FAX 638.000 55.093 893.093` COUNTY GAS TAX 117,000 52,914 169,914 83.000 45,984 122.984 i>OUNTY ROAD LEVY 155.164 '909.669. STREETS SDC 754.500 r-EWE enc 121,000 36,120 157,120' SEWER FUND 1.213.050 172.653 1.385.703 STORM DRAINAGE FUND 630,500 =19,892 610,608 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 4,63.950 O 4.6 950 :_ BOND DEBT FUND 260.500 1 858 X74 '-6 ----------- --- TOTAL REVENUES $14,483,70D $8,272' $936.416 $13.328.388 PR'-RAMS/DEPARTMENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES t POLICE $1.987.872 $41,000 $0 $2„0 8.872 COMMUNITY SERVICES 620.849 59.985 0 $680.834 MUNICIPAL COURT 119.640 0 0 $119.640 LIBRARY 377,900 :30.000 2,280 5410.180 SOCIAL SERVICES 45.600 D 0 $45.600 ----- --- ---- TOTAL COMM SERV 1.151,861 130.985 2.280 3.285.126 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6,800 305,864 CD ADMIN 288.614 10.450 __ DS BUILDING 254.3 .__3"' 0 11.000 265. DS PLANNING 257.781 _=.22_ 8.000 299,004 DS ENGINEERING 199,791 :,8.700 21,100 259.591 PW ADMIN &< BUILD 12.705 0 0 122,705 PW SHOP'S &< SERVICES 103,950 O 0 lo3.950 _ FW WASTEWATER 298,504 0 20.040 318.544 RW STREETS &< LIGHTS 596.00: 0 13.777 611.780 PW PARKS &< GROUNDS 186.385 O 12.053 198,438 ---------' ----------- ------------ TOTAL COMM DEVELOP' _- .310,066 72.37" 92.770 2.475.209 :il-ICY &< ADMINISTRATION 172,000 O O 172.000 I'c`IMIDE SUPPORT I�10N DEPARTMENTAL 551. InO 47,545 47.000 645.645 _ CITY ATTORNEY 80.000 O 40.000 120,000 ----------- ----------- TOTAL CITY WIDE 6=1,100 47.545 87.000 765,645 --- ----------- OPERATING BUDGET 6.:65.027 250,903 182.050 6,697.980 DEEPAT SERVICE 784.450 0 0 784,450 ALL OTHER CIP-GENERAL 211,700 5,000 45.000 261.700 14 CIP-OTHER -5.56_,619 25_000 ______4595 ----------- ------- -5,62__-- .TOTAL CIP _ 5.775.319 ----'30.000 79.595 5.884.91.4 CONTINGENCY/RESERVES GENERAL OPERATING 213,807 -238,481 217,009 192.335 GENERAL RESERVE 1.000,000 0 0 1,000.000 OTHER FUNDS 445.097 -34,150 - -`_57_762 _--768_709 ------ --- --------- _ TOTAL CONTINGENCY 1,658.904 272.63+1 574,771 1,961,044 ----------- --------- ----------- -- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $14.455,700 $0,272 $836,416 $15.Z;28.388 CITY OF FIGARDx OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMSSUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 22.E 1988 - DATE SUBmi"T"I"ED: Januar M25,_ 1988 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Loading Zone PREVIOUSACTION: r _ On S.W. Avenue _... �� PREPARED (3Y: Randall R. Wooled _72 LSU-- DEPT HEAD 01 `U,G?TY ADMIN Oil REQUE.,('ED BY: POLICY ISSUE: Shall a loading zone be designated on S.W. 87th Avenue near Pacific Highway. INFORMATION SUMMARY An additional loading zone has been requested on S.W. 87th Avenue.` The attached memo recommends approval of the loading zone. Police Department has reviewed-the-proposal and does not object. ALTERNATIVES`CONSIDERED as 1. :Approve the loading zone as requested 2. Deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT 113 Approximately $50 for signing. SUGGESTED ACTION Adoption of the attached ordinance creating the loading zone. br/2869D MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and Council January 29, 1988 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City; Engineer SUBJECT: Loading Zone on Southwest 87th Avenue Attached is a letter requesting an additional loading zone on SW 87th Avenue- at Pacific Highway. I have reviewed the history of parking and loading zone restrictions in this block of 87th Avenue. The restrictions were revised in -1986, creating a loading zone in the northerly part of the block and deleting all other parking restrictions Itappearsthat the existing loading zone is still required and cannot be relocated. Usually, I would not recommend having two loading zones in such a :short block. However, it is apparent that the businesses near 87th and Pacific Highway do needa loading zone and have no other available parking. It appears that all operators of businesses in the immediate vicinity of 87th and Pacific Highway support the propose,11 loading ' zone. Therefore, I recommend that a loading zone be created as requested. br/2882D s k t a 11955 Southwest Pacific Highway , Tigard, Oregon 97223 October 21, 1987 4 F f City of Tigard City Council 12420 S. w. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 , Mr. Randy Wooley, Public Works Director Attention: 0 Gentlemen: g zone at Request for loadinNortheast corner of 87th & Pacific Hwy- Re: wy•Re h In June of 1981 the City Council grone anted our request for a loading dzthis at the nor corner of 87th and Pacific Highway, and we enjoy last year the sign convenience for a number of years following. However, erating under : was removed (with no notice to us) and. we since been op �* conditions in this req adverse and burdensome � cycle Shap and Arthur L. Smith, � fie find ourselves, as does the D & S Cy CPA, loading and where we cannot offer our customers this convelace cscreens, cycles, etc. of heavy items such as stoves, firep unloading merit. as well as office equip We again make this appeal to you to . stress enough us a 1-hour loading zone during the business hours for this purpose. We cannot gh thesafety rohibits in view of the busy Pacific Highway wh factor this allows us ich p kind from the front of he Sto�e�asnancreased thetdemand loading oh the f any beauty shop o addition of the nearby y ace available to use to load for parking and there seldon is near-by sp often hand-truck the items into customer'sblockaAblocks a onresult ey theverynarrow sidewalk. bulky stoves, etc for important matter your immediate consideration �. Won't you please give this imp " and reinstate a loading zone to relieve us of this awkward situation. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information to bring about a decision. Thank you. very truly yours, �� D & S CYCLE SHOP A HUR THE ANDIRON FIREPLACE SHOP 1 � Ida A. SP gue , rs)• Cd// Presiden r;es �0 cunei l nr x 7 q q Mid s'lll® �® 111115 X1111111111. �,¢ �{ � • ® ®® 1 : � ®i11 o11®II IIIIi :: 11 :1®1� '■11 11 ' �}�� ` ®11� ®11�® 1111111 s, .4 mosill ■IIIIe� !1 G 11®1111 ! �■It. :IIIJ: :1 :': �IIL� ■ Y'�� 4��' � �� X1111" X11® �■® i'iiTiii� ��® � 3 , ® :1111 � �� /��.� ■ .■ �■ ': � � _} ■■■ Wr ■1 a ' ■ �; ��1110 a 10 ■® ®a ®_ .. _ _� ®� -= = • ® ® oilyIN iE •� "' :,,® .� } _ ;` MAE ,`� ��. ONZO x. ,► �! c J � �tf x� 1 f P t' Jr 4. �� k:Y;fXJ i� Si 1S@ `�J�Fix Y', F - 4J•f.+ �l Zst ff ;yq ..cf�"L T S'i'�'u f� +kt-. Y Vl - < r {.i y' yy Y4�Y k. 1t J.i ��,,.,.>,:._...._wY.M.ai.....,.�, _..-,.gat•:a�,f_t�tK.l.. :.:,Y',.. r..c:-;+: .ro t�'.�� .f;+.A.,c+.i.+til....,.. ,f,'-,,.:a .,,,. i'-,,., .r.e ,- ��.A.e� ..�{,-..... .. ..m. ,.n:. E CITI__OF TIGARD�OREGON COUNCIL AGkNDA Ill__Mi CMMARY , AGENDA OF:. _February 22 988 DA-rE SUBMITTED: Januar 25 1988 — PREVIOUS ACTION: i ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Parking Prohibitions ,, pREPAI•tEf)<BY: Randall R. Wuole ; DEPT H �'"EAD�O CITY FlDMIN OK F_ REQUf 51 CD BY ' POLICY ISSUE Shall parking restrictions be adopted on portions of Burnham Street, 69th Avenue, Locust Street, and Gaarde Street? INFORMATION SUMMARY f I am recommending parking prohibitions At the request of citizens and police, y: on portions of four streets as described in the attached memo. . An ordinance has been 'prepared Which would adopt my recoirnnendati ions. ALTERNAIIVES-CONSIDERED Ie 1. Approve the ordinance as prepared. 2. Direct that the ordinance be amended. 3 Reject the ordinance, it k FISCAL IMPACT A proximately $400 for signing casts. , p , .� SUGGESTED ACTION Adoption of the ordinance as prepared, br/2869D r,; 11 ligin 1 11 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and Council January 29, 1988 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer SUBJECT: Parking Prohibitions In-response to various requests from citizens, I am recommer'ing additional `parking restrictions in four locations. These proposed prohibitions have been reviewed with the police chief. trnham Street Prohibition of ,parking along the north side of Burnham Street near Hall Boulevard has been requested' by the <Tigard Water District. The District is the owner of the adjoining property. Attached is a copy of their letter of request. Prohibition of on-street 'parking is consistent with the long—range planning for nurnham Street. For this reason, and for the reasons stated in the District's letter, I recommend ,that the District's request be granted. 69th Avenue On 69thAvenue, north of Pacific Highway, parked vehicles occasionally interfere with the operation of the intersection and of the traffic' signals. When cars are parked in this area, it is difficult for motorists to enter and leave the Pacific Highway intersection in the marked traffic lanes. I propose to prohibit parking, along 69th Avenue from Pacific Highway to a point approximately 50 feet south of the driveway to Banning's Restaurant. The owners of the adjoining properties have been notified of this proposal. The owner of Banning's Restaurant has indicated that he understands the need for parking restrictions and can accept the restrictions as proposed. Locust Street We have received a number of requests to have parking proh"ited on Locust Street between Greenburg Road and 93rd Avenue. It is difficult for eastbound traffic to stay within the marked traffic lane when parked cars are present. Callers also complain that parked cars restrict sight distance at driveways. The problem is most severe along the south side of Locust Street. Owners of the adjoining properties were notified of the proposed parking prohibition in early January. Their responses provide strong support for prohibition of parking on the south side. However, there was concern expressed that prohibiting parking on the north side would create problems for clients of the medical offices on the north. side of the street. Based on my review of the 3 s i { Mayor and City Council Page 2 January 29, 1988 i a t ' location and comments received from citizens and property owners, I conclude that parking 'along the south side is currently a problem that should be eliminated and that parking along the north side creates little current k problem for motorists. Therefore, 'I am recommending that parking be prohibited only on the south side of Locust Street at this time. Gaarde Street Parking is currently prohibited on Gaarde 'Street except that parking is allowed on the north side of Gaarde for approximately 190 feeteastof 110th Avenue. Residents of the area have complained that theparkedcars make it difficult- to see westbound traffic when entering', Gaarde Street from 110th Avenue. The Tigard Police have recommended that the parking on Gaarde be eliminated for _a minimum of 80 feet east of 110th Avenue to improve site distance. The police would prefer to see all parking prohibited. In September, owners of: a abutting properties were notified of the-proposed parking restrictions. Only:two responses were received. Attached is a letter from Brad Parrott opposing further parking restrictions. I also received a phone call from Mike` Jaskelka of the First Baptist Church; he favored parking restrictions on Gaarde as long as parking is available on >110th Avenue. Eventually, when more of Gaarde is widened to full standards, we will want to eliminate all parking on Gaarde in order ,to mark turn lanes. Currently, however, the widened sections ;are too short to accommodate turn lanes. Parking- is currently available on the west side of 110th and there is no proposal to change 110th Avenue parking. I propose to prohibit parking for. 80 _feet _east of 110th Avenue on the north side of Gaarde to improve safety, as recommended by the police, and to allow the rest of the existing parking to remain until additional street improvements are completed in the future. br12882D T I G A R D WATER DISTRICT-8841 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. TIGARD.OREGON 97223-6290' PHONE (503) 639-1554 t 4,; November 27, 1987 ` lkll Randy R. 'Wooley, P. E. Deputy-Director/City Engineer City of Tigard P. 0. Box '23397 WA Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: No parking areas; Request for Dear `Randy: It is requested that vehicles not be allowed to park in the street,` next-to the curb, along that portion of SWBurnham,Street and Hall Boulevard, where the new TWD Operations Center will be constructed. (Air-King site) . The area shown on the enclosed map in red defines the specific limits of requested no parking. Parking in the small area located directly in front of Roof ,& Shine Roofing (inside the diagonal white line) should be con- tinued. The reasons for this request are as follows: 1. The street is too narrow to accomodate parking and the type of vehicles (trucks, etc.) that utilize this thoroughfare. 2. There is no need for such parking space. All businesses located across the street have on-site parking lots, including Tigard Electric, Precision Graphics, and Burnham Business Park. Presently, there is no activity on the site where TWD will build its facility. 3. One of the conditions imposed by the Hearings Officer, prior to the city issuing a building permit to TWD, is that there must be 350 feet of safe sight distance on both sides of the main driveway (located near the existing fire hydrant) . Any street parking would interfere with this requirement. 4. TWD will provide 61 on-site parking spaces when the facility is built, more than ample to meet all anticipated parking needs. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Abil/Vantee, P. E. Administrator 'prWo IN— Man m>- - 1 J R 1 N , � . 0. _ g®1°900 N ten )0 18100 Ac. NZAc. C r\ .4 700'9� e ® .J5Ac j4.2 18 O V. ' J 1500 �0 95AC. 2000 / .46A c. f 2100 �^ ®.9 3, 4.33Ac. ` i I 61 Ac.) / , r 7 , �O le (3.58 Ac.) / � a (156,000 sq. ft.) iJ / e 500ti° `� �"7 Ac. s � J� �� a� PROPOSED SITE' ~2200ley o o OPERATIONS CENTER / r _ i s�ai/ = TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Itti � n 4- 20469.41 P.C. .210 '.-e.,... —(4 Acc. pyo Map 2S -2AD i dSTREET- �L ,111 Scale: 1" v 100' co SCE MAIC SEE MAP 2S 12DB 2S 12DA Parrott&Associates Certified Public Accountants September 17, 1987 aZ��., rim n 1 8 Mr. Randall R. Wooley City of .Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd: P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Parking Restrictions on S.W. Gaarde Street "hear'Mr. Wooley: I am both the landlord and an occupant of the four-plex at 11000 and '11010 S.W. Gaarde. The apartments have only one parking spot for each of the units. Mosthouseholdshave at least two cars. All of us in the four-plex are parking our second cars next to our units, on Gaarde. This is the only place we can park these cars. And the only place guests can park their cars. Gaarde Street bends tothesouth just one-half° block from 110th. Also, there already is no parking on Gaarde within 20 feet of 110th. Because of these two reasons, vehicles parked on Gaarde Street directly across from my apartments do not restrict the sight distance for drivers entering Gaarde Street from 110th Avenue. I request on behalf of myself and my tenants that no additional parking restrictions be imposed on S. W. Gaarde Street east of 110th Avenue. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Brad M. Parrott Cr Suite 216.6700 S.W. 105th Avenue•Beaverton,OR 97005 (503)626-8561 ME •moi �r .r. r."'r - S 69th Avenue vicinity Map s = ■ �a �� ■11111 '/�■'�■ .i �►'�■®■: ■ ,I ni c 11 111. J ®p = ►�awl _ x i■ �:�CI 18■■ 011\1 Milli ■ 0 it JL ® �' ■■■ILocust Streets�r5 oVicinity Map ` din _■ �1.�. a��.�,,, !��. ,111 _IIIlion ` ■l�iilll ■m"1■ oiill ■/l 1111 'M1■" mill ��■ lllll .!'al®■®x: 111"� °1111/® 800, ME A EGaardL street vicinity MaP Y ry IKE #° ,r �= W l�r►.�i .= : ill Boo, > ; 4,, •.,_, ry �'� ■gyp MOM son k ■ 1 \II Will �Illli. t H, r !-��1� �►� �� : . 1 iii 11�- t ■� �� MINE 101 ��■��0■1:■��►/; f ,`. b -.. now x ■: �� } ■ rr .. �7' � 11711� 4 ME 11111 5 t 5 H3 - � L { .z � i ! y� 3�4 t1{ ��t.A "R..� ._ n�f r�T � ^«r #• 7t 3:. s ��, i' ¢ <cY,{} K .,�,:, f. -.,'.'w1 t ,. :t :*a`. .dt ...,.A..,. •e ....x...s,Y,�..... ...�.kl.J:,.... ..-<..._ ` City f Hillsboro 205 S.E. Second Ave.o 681-6100 ❑ Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 February 4, 1988 Mr. Bruce Warner, Director Department of Land Use and Transportation 150 N. First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Dear Bruce: i wish to voice a resounding "second" to the street lights proposal of the City of Beaverton in the letter from Linda Davis to you, under date of June 27, 1988. The issue of street lights surely needs be addressed as Ms. Davis very accurately advised you of a problem which, unless changed by policy, will continue to cause annexing entities significant costs in buying out the power company capital interests in street lights. We would join in urging you to: a. Require street lights in all new subdivisions and developments conceivably subject to annexation or incorporation and these in accordance with a County approved street lighting policy, not necessarily one devised by the seller of the service (you note there is presently a surplus of electrical power) ; and b. That these required lights be paid for by the developer so that only the M and 0 costs accrue to either the lighting district or the annexing entity. An Equal Opportunity Employer Qe _ytp, Mr. Bruce Warner February 4, 1988 Page 2 Thank you for early attention to our request. Very truly yours, CITY OF HILLSBORO E. S Mills " City Manager ESM/gw cc: C. Cameron L. Davis L. Cole S. Huffman B. Jean S. Rhodes` C. F'essler R. Gibson c \i f (0411Y OF 1117A PD February 24, 1988 OREGON David C. Haugeberg, Attorney at Law Haugeberg, Rueter, Stone 'Gowell & Fredricks, P.C. P.O. Box 480 McMinnville, OR 97128 Rea Access Oregon Program Dear Mr. Haugeberg: The Tigard City Council has adopted Resolution No. 88-19 supporting the Access Oregon program, as suggested in your letter of February 5, 1988. Enclosed is a copy of the resolution. The City of ,Tigard strongly supports the joint effort to improve the 99W/18 corridor. Thank you for your work"and support for our common goal.. ' Sincerely, 7 � ' - ec— Randall R. Wooley Acting Director, Community Development cc: Frank Angelo, Washington County DLUT br/3395D 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,RO,Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 i r)NORABLE NEIL GOLDSCHMIDT HONORABLE JIM SIMMONS HONORABLE DONALD LEARD l VER NOR OF THE STATE OF OREGON OREGON SENATE MAYOR OF LAFAYETTE 454 STATE CAPITOL 12160 SW PAR 4 DRIVE P 0 BOX 55 EN OR 97310 TIGARD OR 97223 LAFAYETTE OR 97127 HONORABLE LES AUCOIN HONORABLE PAUL PHILLIPS HONORABLE NEIL COHAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OREGON HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MAYOR OF DUNDEE 1716 FEDERAL`BLDG 15075 SW DAWN COURT P 0 BOX 201 DUNDEE OR 971150201 1220 SW THIRD TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97204 RICK KUL24 REGION 1 ENGINEER HONORABLE J.A. HEBERT ROBERT N BOTHMAN, DIRECTOR OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION MAYOR OF SHERIDAN OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 9002 SE MCLOUGHLIN 'STREET 139 NW YAmHILL 135 TRANSPORTATION BLDG. MILWAUKIE OR 97222 SHERIDAN OR 97378 SALEM OR 97310 MICfHAEY, P HOLLERN, CHAIRMAR WILLIAN ANHORN, REGION 2 HONORABLE FRANCIS EDDY ENGINEER MAYOR OF WILLAMINA ORLON TRANSPORTATION COM Wo BROOKS RESOURCES, OR DEPT 0}r TRANSPORTATIONP O BOX 629 PtO BOX`6119 2960 STATE ST I HILLAMINA OR 97396 REED OR`97709 SALEM OR 97310 I JOHN WHITTY, VICE CHAIRMAN HONORABLE` STARK yA DAVID BI`sHOP, CHAIRPERSON SSION OREGON,TRANSPORTATION CON' YOR OF VILSONVILLE YAMHILL COUNTY COURTHOUSE � YAPHHILL COUNTY COURTHOUSE NORTH 4 -STR `f P'0 BOX 220 525 EAST FIFTH COOS BAY OR X37420 i' WILSONVILLE OR•97070• NCMINNVILLE OR 97128 v� HONORABLE JEAN YOUNG ALBERTA BRYANT, CHAIRPERSON MAYOR OF KING CITY LINCOLN COUNTY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116TH AVE LINCOLN COUNTYCOURTHOUSE KING CITY OR 97224 225 WEST OLIVE [ NEWPORT OR 97365 G'fiNTHIA.FOR.D' HONORABLE DONALD STEPHENS DAVID HAUGEBERG, AM AT LAW OREGON-TRANSPORTATION CON MAYOR OF DURHAN HAUGEBERG, RUTER, STONE, 33'VALLEY VM-DA P 0 BOX 23483 GOWELL AND FREDRICKS HEDFORD OR, 97504 TIGARD OR 97223 P0 BOX 480 OR 97128 DAVID BOLLENDER HONORABLE EDWARD GORMLEY HONORABLE NORMA OYLER OREGON TRANSPORTATION COM MAYOR OF MCMINNVILLE KAYOR OF SHERWOOD Wo PP do L 230 EAST SECOND ST P 0 BOX 167 920 SW SIXTH, VE NCMINNVILLE OR 97128 SHERWOOD OR 97140 PORTLANDIOR 97204 .ROBERT WVALL• HONORABLE ELVERN HALL HONORABLE LUANNE THIELKE O M MAYOR OF NE6dBERG MAYOR OF TUALATIN 414 EAST IST STREET P 0 BOX 369TUALATIN OR 97052 NEWBERG OR 97132 r� &")vel o �°��`�