The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 12/14/1987 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an a) ,o REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate , STUDY AGENDA sign—up sheet(s) . If no sheet is available, DECEMBER 14, 1987, 7:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start v •H TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are E Q 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters H14 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 7:30 1. STUDY MEETING: 1. 1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Designation of Chair 7:35 '• FANNO CREEK CONFERENCE REPORT o Community Services Director 7:45 3. SUMMERCREEK CROSSING DISCUSSION o City Engineer 8:15 4. TRANSPORTATION PLAN DISCUSSION o City Engineer 9:15 5. BULL. MOUNTAWWALNUT STUDY REPORT o City Administrator 9:45 6. TUALAIIN RIVER WATER QUALITY REPORT o City Administrator i 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 10:00 8. ADJOURNMENT lw/2123D i 4 f f $S 1 E r i COUNCIL AGENDA — DECEMBER 14, 1987 — PAGE 1 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL. REGUI-AR MEETING MINUTES December, 14, 1987 1 . ROLL CALL: Present: Council President Pru—Tem, Carolyn Eadon, Councilors: Valerie Johnson and John Schwartz; City S'aff: Bob Jean, Director ; Jill Bill Monahan, Community Development City Administrator; resent for the Fanno Creek Monley, Community Services Director' (P Catherine Wheatley, Conference Report only); Tim Ramis, t_egal Counsel; Deputy Recorder; and Randy Wooley, C►ty Engineer. 2. PROCLAMATION a, Council President Pro--Tem Eadon read into the record, by title, a proclamation declaring December , 1987 as "Deinking and Drugged Driving Awareness Month." FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS (To be placed on the agenda at the end of the 3 CALL meeting) : a. Policy and guidelines on piano in Library -- Councilor Johnson. b. Keys to the City information -- Councilor Schwartz. C. Resolution — "Access Oregon" Improvements to highway 99W"ighway 18 — Councilor Schwartz. d. Council calendar- update information -- Bob Jean. 4. FANNO CREEK CONFERENCE REPORT a. Community Services Director- advise>d that she had met with Councilors etfthe for Lho Johnson and Edwards last week to da �cnnferen ce hask� beenctiv 'Sscheduled Fanno Creek Conference. The all—day have estimatod about 150-200 for- Saturday, February 27, and they people would attend. She briefly outlined a tentative schedule for the day' s events. asked for ideas in choosing a guest Community Services Director ested Jack Faust, the mod<arator for speaker. Councilor Schwartz sugg the program, Town Nall." The City Attorney said he would contact Mr. Faust to determine if he would be available. cover e cost Of There will be admissionCommunity cSerharvic Services Director would that a tc�onvention the lunch. The packet would be prepared which would include such items as maps, agendas, board and committee rosters/inhat may beoravaiat ion, name entitled, "I Am There was discussion on a movie j Second Version) ." Because of What I Was When 5. SUMMER CREEK CROSSING DISCUSSION rmation a. City Engineer summarized this there a was discussion of. During ehow Dt-ooprovide process for SW 135th Avenue, the new crossing of Summer Creek. Should a bridge be constructed or could the City simply modify the existing culverts or was there some other alternative that sho should bge87 considered. City Engineer reported Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER that staff concluded that additional engineering work was required to adequately answer the question. The Council directed that the additional engineering analysis be performed as part of the consultant's design contract. City Engineer introduced Dave Sandstrom, from Robert E. Meyer', Consultants, Inc. Mr. Sandstrom went over three alternatives, the pros and cons, and the costs. Displayed for- Council view were three enlarged plans detailing each of the alternatives. b. Mr. Sandstrom then described each alternative: (1) Low profile -- extend existing culvert. Total price would be $62,000. -this alternative would provide for water- flows up to range. The alternative would the 10— to 20—year storm—frequency entail extending the existing culverts arid -adding wing walls. A traffic detour would riot be necessary during construction. This alternative is about $'. ,000 higher than what was thought: on the original estimate. City Engineer explained that this was partially due to the fact that the engineers now know more about thea conditions. This alternative would meet FEMA requirements . (2) High profile -- bridge, 40 foot span. Total cosi: would be $171,000. Mr. Sandstrom explained that this would be a pile--supported bridge. Construction activities would require closure of the road. This alternative would be adequate to m`'c't the needs of up to a 1()0- year storm. There was discussion on the freeboard space (the area between the bottom of the bridge and the flows beneath it) . For the 100—year- flood, this bridge would have a 2. 17 foot freeboard space. Mr. Sandstrom briefly described the hydraulic models that were used to calculate the design flow for all three of the alternatives; these models were developed in 1982. (3) The third alternative was for large culverts at a cost of i $l77_,OUO. This was presented as an alternative to illustrate that it would be essentially the same as the cost of putting in a bridge, yet the bridge would have more capacity to accommodate c higher floods. Therefore, this was not recommended as an alternative to be considered extensively, expressed concern over any of the alternatives C. Councilor Schwartz i holding back a lot of water and what would happen when the water was l r released downstream. City Engineer responded that this design was inthat the Coi ineers keeping with the Master Drainage 'tPlan oWnstream anyway rpsCityEEngineer study assumed that the water g said that he did not tti:nk that this would have a lot of impact. d. Pros and Cons of each of the alternatives were discussed: page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER 14, 1987 Option 1 : Pro - low cost, no change in the road grade, no detour, and construction time would be faster. Con - there would be periodic flooding which would increase in frequency as the 2.800 acres above is developed. The flooding, however, would not be every year and would be for relatively short periods of time. There would be the potential for increased road maintenance because of flooding. Increased liability noted, concerns were Option 2: Pro - the 100--year floodplain requirements would be met. It would be a better solution from an engineering standpoint, there would be no erosion concerns, and this option would be a long--tern) solution. Con - the major drawback would be the expense. There was discussion by City Administrator on funding available and the SDC monies which could be used if the Council so desires. It was estimated that within the next five years approximately 1,000 dwelling units would be constr•uctod which would contribute to the SDC funds . Option 3 / Alternative #1 has many of Lho same advantages a, the bridge, but it. ` would nut provide for increased floods and litter/debris passage. This option would require a higher' level of maintenance than the bridge option. In addition, the bridge would be longer Lerm and would reduce liability. e. There was discussion on the freeboard spaca for' the bridge and whether or not that could be increased. The City Engineer reported that the freeboard space for- the bridge could be increased with little additional money. f. Councilor Schwartz indicated that he would like to have staff come back with more information. He still had some concerris potential for additional downstream flooding and wouldalso t,li,ke l'to see cost- estimates for another foot- or two of increased freeboard space for the bridge alternative. Council consensus was to have staff report back on these items on January 11, 1988. 5. TRANSPORTATION PLAN a. City Engineer went over this agenda item and said that the first step in the Transportation Plan would be to identify needs. lie noted that the Council meeting packet contained a status report on the Transportation Plan Update and summarized the contents of the report. b. There was discussion on the possibility that some local streets are accommodating some overflow from collector streets. Specifically mentioned were Garrett and Frewing. It was decided that these individual streets would probably be addressed during the NPO meetings on the Transportation Plan. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 14, 1987 c. There was discussion on timing and when Council input is neoJed in order to keep the Transportation Plan on schedule. Consensus was for Council to submit their comments/concerns to the City Engineer by January 7, 1988. City Administrator will advise Mayor and Councilor Edwards of this time frame. 6. BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT STUDY REPORT a. City Administrator, went through the draft report with Council. His 'I overview comments included the fact that urbanization is clearly occurring in this area --.... it is one of the fastest: growing areas in Washington County. b. Councilor Johnson expressed sol»e concern over the R--6 zoning. There is no City equivalent at this Lime which would reflect this zoning. The possibility of amending the Zoning Code was discussed. C. There was discussion on the section of the report which dealt with other- agencies and their service levels. It was suggested that some of these figures and statements be confirmed, i .e. , fire district rating, is this Class 8 or 97 d, City Admini,;tr•ator notod that figures used in the tablos reflect 1987 dollars; that is, there was no attempt to y udy and further Administrator went through the charts in thin draft st explained tho break--even points and various scenarios where:in these figures could alter somewhat-. He noted of particular interest was the capture of certain revenues that would riot be available to this �. area should they remain unincorporated. e. Thera was discussion on 7I.r' funds and how they have riot remained in this area. With annexation, the City Administrator said these households would see these revenues being used in their all f. Council will have their comments back to the City Administrator within one week. City Administrator will prepare a final draft report for the January 11, 1988 meeting. City Administrator will advise Mayor and Council Edwards of this timeline. 7. TUALATIN RIVER WATER QUALITY UPDATE a. This item was briefly summarized by the City Administrator-. He rioted that, in the past, there had been no over-all coordination of the water management plan. Fie reported on the preliminary stages of the Washington County Water Resource Management Strategy. This is just the beginning of the process and input is now needed from each of the jurisdictions. b. City Administrator advised that he will keep the Council informed as this management strategy develops. Gary Ott from NPO ##1 was present and expressed some concerns; he. asked several questions regarding gard' s involvement with this process. i� Page 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER 14, 1987 8. NON—AGENDA ITEMS .. a. Piano Policy and Guidelines Councilor Johnson expressed concerns regarding the piano which is now in the Library. :she questioned why it had not been available at times for usage by the public. City Administrator reported that the piano usage by the public was tied into the Interim Building Use Policy which in turn hinges on the outcome of the direction from the Court Study. He noted problems with moving the piano (i.e. , tuning problems, etc. ) . b. Keys to the City Councilor Schwartz rioted he had been contacted by one of the GTE. employees who had been presented with a Key to the City at the last meeting. This employee had expressed some discontentment in that he felt the whole story had riot been relayed to the Council. City Administrator indicated there would be some double checking on this item. c. Access Oregon Resolution Council consensus: was that a resolution be prepared with regard to "Access Oregon" Improvements to highway 99W/Highway 18. This item was Scheduled for January 11 , " 88. The format will be similar to the Sherwood Resolution which had been rcaceived in Council mail. { 9. EXECUTIVE SESSI0N a. the Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:30 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (ca), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues . 10. ADJOURNMENT — 10:56 p.m. Approved by the Tigard City Council on January 11, 1988. -Ca'tivtt�u at&�L-- Deputy Recorder — Cit of Tig ATTEST: Mayor — City of Tigard C CW/2424D i P«ge 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — DECEMBER 14, 1987 6 t a k lo Od .. M O '-� ,� g Q� w 6:5 a� as VNA a u O JZ V C — ° _ o z a IM m m �, m U n V o 03 C- m CL cc a f 0 p v 'A o • • • Z c a N uj nj cc uj Z O N' dJ3 m C► UJm m _ u, Z rA C13 WO co o = ate ` 0 m E W a fa co m �- rj LL- m C0 m w r j CL R j O C CL 3 0 Q t~9 b o w o� 3 0 m � Z Damm 2 m O= 3 m� 3 v ® w (� w 0 Q d mn" oc 0 J. 0LL S tit mo ✓ o G m m ~ LO.cv v m a v Q d u-O � cosov - m . E a O o.6— a p r- 1 D 0 c DECEMBER 14, 1987 — COUNCIL MEETING SYNOPSIS i 1. STULY MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call Br and Ed Absent 1.2 Designation of Chair Ea 2. FANNO CREEK CONFERENCE REPORT — update by Com. Svc. Dir. Tim Ramis to Contact Jack Faust — possible speaker 3. SUMMERCREEK CROSSING DISCUSSION City Engineer to update Br and Ed; return with more info. on 12/21/87 on bridge alternative (increased free board footage) 4. TRANSPORTATION PLAN DISCUSSION Councilors to have suggestions to City Engineer by 1/7/88 5. BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT STUDY REPORT Council comwmts to City Admin. within 1 reek; Final Report for Council Meeting of 1/11/88 6. TUALATIN RIVER WATER QUALITY REPORT City Admin. will keep advised. 7. NON AGENDA Piano Policy & Guidelines — Jo concerns; CA reported tied into interim building use policy which in turn hinges on outcome of direction from Court Study. Keys to City — Sc noted concerns with content of Keys to GTE employees last meeting; double checking of facts Resolution — "Access Oregon" Improvements to Hwy. 99W/Highway 18 to be prepared for 1/11/88 meeting; format similar to Sherwood Resolution received in Council Mail. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:30 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 8. ADJOURNMENT — 10:56 p.m. cw/2123D COUNCIL AGENDA — DECEMBER 14, 1987 — PAGE 1 I SAM. F I ` PROCLAMATION PPPPPP''' :111SS1 WHEREAS, drinking and drugged drivers cause over half of all . fatal and serious injury-involved traffic crashes in the State of Oregon each year -- at a cost of an estimated $250 million to oglft+> g YkpM: yl Oregonians annually; and I7 -t personal \•Mf,, _ WHEREAS, this intolerable destruction of lives and pl property can be drastically reduced through a combination of effective i, .. laws; community programs that integrate and coordinate the 111110 enforcement, prosecution, adjudication, treatment, and education i�11111U; components of the "Driving Under the Influence (DDI) System"; changes I''tUyyi'` _ in societal attitudes toward drinking and driving; and increased safety belt usage; and w WHEREAS, the progress we have seen to date is in part the result of the outrage of millions of committed citizens across theINSilt , lH,. nation and thousands of caring Oregonians; and }?tl'MP WHEREAS, by working together toward a common goal of fewer + ! alcohol and drug-related highway crashes, we may enjoy a safer roadway ' system. Q$ , � •4 NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Tom Brian, Mayor of the City of Tigard. ..afII1�1" MIR" Oregon, hereby proclaim the month of December 1987, as :111fl( i'- jt?��11t'? DRINKING AND DRUGGED DRIVING AWARENESS MONTH . f3 citizens to join in this observance. in Tigard and encourage alltdi �j 5"lllifi�; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i hereunto »• "j'urY c set my hand and cause the Great ilk Seal of thr City of Tigard. _ 4^ Oregon to be affixed. Done at ,i the Tigard Town hall in the City of Tiy;ard and the State of �+ z Oregon. on this day, December 7, {, in the Year of our Lord, One7fl Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty g?r' Fj Seven. x Tom Brian, Mayor I : r M1 Ci y Recorder ^^•« ..;y� d a't: a �Mni ` r Win''` MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council December 4, 1987 FROM: Jill Monley, Community Services Director�� SUBJECT: Fanno Creek Conference As follow—up to the Council discussion on Saturday, November 21st, Valerie, Jerry, Carolyn, and I will be meeting to assemble an outline for the Fanno Creek Conference planned for February 27, 1988. We'd like to share that outline with you on Monday, December 14th, in the Council Work Study Session. sb/2132D 01 t MEN CITY OF -Li ARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: December 14,. �j 1987 DATE SUBMI-f-f*ED: November 29, ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 135th Avenue/ PREVIOUS ACVION: Summer Creek Crossing Discussion_ PREPARED BY: Randa-11 R. Wooley DEPT HEAD 04M* CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE A discussion of engineering alternatives for the 135th Avenue crossing of Summer Creek ................................ -------------- ............... INFORMATION SUMMARY During the LID formation process for, SW 135th Avenue, there was discussion of how to provide the new crossing of Summer Creek Should a bridge be constructed or, can we simply modify the existing culverts or' is there some other alternative that: should be considered? We concluded that additional engineering work was required to adequately answer- the question. The Council directed that Lho addition,.Al engineering analysis be performed as part of the consultant' s design contract. The preliminary engineering has been done and the consultant will be ready on December 14th to present the alternatives and to discuss the advanLiAyes and disadvantages of C.N.i,c h alternative. The presentation will be or-al with appropri,atu, drawings to explain the alternatives. ......... ..I. ........... .... ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED To be presented on Docmebor 14th. FISCAL IMPACT The LID cost estimate- were based on modification of the existing culverts. If a more expensive crossing structure is selected, the Council has indicated that the additional cost would be borne by the City's Street CIP fund. SUGGESTED ACTION The City Engineer will prepare a recommendation following the consultant's presentation. br/2029D N n CX C 0'-V C\e d1 1zl ly IS- ¢ Consultants, S.W.Griffith Drive,Suite 100,Beaverton,OR 97005 Robert E. zypr Consultants,Inc. (503)643.7531 December 14, 1987 CITY OF TIGARD 135TH AVENUE LID SUMMER CREEK CROSSING 1548-01 t e ALTERNATIVE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE* 1 yY } SUBTOTAL TOTAL 1. LOW PROFILE Extend existing culvert $ 62,000 $ 62,000 r 1 2. HIGH PROFILE A. Bridge, 401 span 1. Bridge Construction 138,000 x 2. Engineering 4,800 3. Detour 28,200 Total 171,000 B. Large Culverts 1, Culvert & Headwall Const. 139,000 2. Engineering 4,800 3. Detour 28,200 Total 172,000 * Does not include contingencies C Engineering• Planning 9 Surveying • Landscape Architecture E)vc rsl 1ej DOMM .......... ,(eli�iP►�i{Dill ili�eii�ii�iili III�iI1�lil�llr III.(Ifi �l�T fl(m 111 111 1 fl 11i Ili I I � :i I � ___- ,__..�_ —...._.�... 3 NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO .. TFE QUALITY OF TiE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. ---._...�__-------- _ .._.---_.. _---- - ._...-------. ._--_ __. OB 62 8Z tZ 92 SZ bZ E2 Z2 iZ OZ 61 81 LI 91 Sf bl EI ZI it 01 6 8 1 9 5 b .nlrunlnu�wdnu�wdru� wlui��lnl�tllbui � RCH — -- — f 190 -- _ f j o� / 5 i - - - / TTL r: I f12 NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED ..._..- _DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THANTHIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TOTHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINALDRAWING. oe sz ez a ez sz *z ez zz lz oz a B1ii si si tii etz1 �i-4i6_ e- z -9- s-- b Ez ti uu un uHluu uulaH MARCH � ' 7 ; , 1990 I it i � Q N 9 I 1 g I, W 1 . t i t I!' i I I � � � �\ I \ 1 � � � � .� � ,� � - �, �5 .i , , ��, � 'i �,i,�� ', ;� � �1 i i f� �` .� t. 1111 � ` � I Y t � � � � 4 ''J A S � �'1/ " � � V ' � I _ � � � —�- � � � a ,�. q � � � �� _ .� � ,V � i f � �\ � � � � � » , � � � � ,i �� , :� _ _ _ _ _� ._} . . . r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGE_ NDA ITEM S____NMMRY ' AGENDA OF: Deco 14, 1987 DATE SUE3MITTED: December_4_r. 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Transportation PREVIOUS ACTION: Plan Update PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole CITY ADMTN OK REQUES fE,D BY DEPT HEAD OK'- � T' _ POLICY ISSUE Transportation Plan Update INFORMATION SUMMARY At your December 14th meeting I will provide a brief status report on the good opportunity for, Transportation flan Update. This meeting would also be a g date process and the Council to provide any comments on the proposed plan up the preliminary "needs" lists which have a been prmber . Alsotattached is4apcopy my memo to the NPO' s which you which may be of the City' s current Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map, helpful in reviewing the materials. ALTER_NATI•VE:S CONSIDERED --- FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION wisheshe Council No formal action ad the Tran less tion AdvisoryCommittee-changeprogram Any comments proposed by staff n the "needs" lists will be shared with the Committee at its next meeting. br/2117D MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Neighborhood Panning organizations Bull Mountain CPO Metzger CPO Economic Development Committee City Center Plan Task Force November 12, 1987 South Metzger CIP Task Force FROM: Randall R. Woo , City Engineer r�' ./� ^� c SUBJECT: Transportation Facilities Plan During the next year, we will be working on updating the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map and developing a facilities plan for transportation improvement needs. Attached is a description of the process we will be following. or . The first step is the identification of needs or problems that need to be resolved. We request the assistance of the neighborhood groups to review the needs lists and add additional projects if appropriate. Please review the attached material at your next meeting and forward to me any comments the group may have. I need to receive your comments prior to the Transportation Advisory Committee meeting of January 14, 1988. I will be available to meet with any group that wishes further information or discussion on the transportation facilities plan process. cc: City Council cc: Planning Commission cc: Brent Curtis, Washington County DLUT br/18010 A ' 11 . I 4 DEVELOPING A TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES PLAN FOR TIGARD i WHAT ARE WE DOING AND WHY? 4 In 1983 the City adopted a Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map which describes the arterial and collector street system to be improved and developed as Tigard continues to grow. Since 1983 a number of local and I' regional studies have helped to define more precisely the street system needs. i Each year additional street improvements are completed in accordance } with the Comprehensive Plan. But, each year the traffic volumes in Tigard also increase as our population continues to grow. Traffic growth is outpacing street improvements. The result is safety concerns and congestion as narrow, formerly rural reads receive the demands of the urban traffic. d One of the City Council goals for this fiscal year is development- of a 1 Transportation Plan. The Plan is expected to accomplish several things. 5 The Plan will update the 1983 Transportation Map and provide more detail on the improvements needed, both current needs and needs for expected future development. This will help us to plan for the future and to review the impacts of proposed development. The Plan will help us to establish the magnitude of the City's total transportation needs and to establish the priorities for implementing improvements. Once the priorities and costs are known, we can better address the questions of how to fund the needed improvements. Finally, it will prepare us for the update of our Comprehensive Plan in 1989 as required by State Law. A public facilities plan is now a required part of each agency's Comprehensive Plan. WHO WILL PREPARE THE PLAN? The City's Transportation Advisory Committee will take the lead in 4 preparing a plan to recommend to the City Council for adoption. In order for this volunteer Committee to make informed decisions, they will need input from a number of other sources. Technical data will be provided by the Community Development Department of the City. The Committee also needs to know the desires of the various neighborhoods. Your ideas are important. We will be asking that the neighborhoods actively participate to define their needs and priorities. This neighborhood input can best be directed through the various Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO's) already established. Any portion of the plan which requires a revision of the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map will also need to be reviewed by the C Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would hold a public hearing and 1 make a recommendation to the City Council. br/1602D Page 1 WHAT IS THE SCHEDULE? .r- The tentative schedule is as follows: October, 1987 - Identify transportation needs based on existing plans, completed studies, and past public input (City Staff) . November - December, 1987 - Review the list of transportation needs and revise as necessary (Transportation Advisory Committee with input from neighborhoods). January - February, 1988 - Define scope of work, cost and possible phasing for improvements to address the identified current transportation needs. For future street improvements, initiate preliminar% engineering studies to determine future street alignments.' (City Engineering Staff) March - April, 1988 - Review project descriptions and develop priorities for implementation of transportation projects to resolve current needs. (Transportation Advisory Committee, with input from neighborhoods). May, 1988 - Prepare a draft of the formal plan (City Staff). June - July, 1988 - Review the draft plan and revise as necessary (Transportation Advisory Committee, with input from neighborhoods) . August, 1988 - Formal adoption of the plan. Fall and Winter, 1988 - Develop strategies for implementing the plan and funding the projects. Complete the review and adoption of alignments for future street improvements, as necessary. WHERE ARE WE NOW? Staff has prepared a preliminary list of transportation needs for Committee review. The list is attached. Projects have been listed by NPO to simplify neighborhood review. Because NPO's 1 and 2 are currently functioning as one NPO, they are shown in a combined list. "Projects Already Funded" are those identified in the Six-Year Plan of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) or in the City's current budget or funded by an existing local improvement district (LID) . Those projects listed as "P.E. only" have only been funded for preliminary engineering. The Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee (WCTCC) has recommended some additional projects to be considered for inclusion in the ODOT Six-Year Plan when it is updated in 1988. Those projects are listed separately. The other needs identified include both current needs and projects needed to accommodate future. growth. A letter code after each project indicates the primary purpose of the project, as follows: C - Capacity improvement S - Safety imorovement R - Improvements to correct an existing rough surface H - Hydraulic improvements to remove an obstruction to a major drainageway br/1602D Note that capacity improvements usually also improve safety. Safety improvements frequently also increase street capacity. "Current Needs" are the transportation improvements needed to bring the i existing system to an acceptable level of safety and capacity. Current needs include only projects within the existing city limits. "Future Needs" are the additional improvements needed to accommodate anticipated future growth. t In the case of NPO 3 and NPO 8, "Future Needs" also includes projects which are in Tigard's planning area but are currently outside the city limits. If the project areas are annexed to the City at some future time, these projects would need to be included in the City's improvement program. Some of the "Future Needs" projects will require construction of new ' roadways or realignment of existing roadways. Engineering analysis and public review of alternatives will be required. In some cases, the review process may extend beyond the proposed August, 1988, adoption of the new Transportation Plan. If so, each project can be added to the Plan as an amendment as the review process is completed. ARE ALL STREET NEEDS INCLUDED? No. This plan is only to address the needs of arterial and collector Cstreet systems and other City-wide transportation needs. Development of the local street system in the various subdivisions is usually the responsibility of the developer or the adjoining property owners. Local streets are not specifically addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. WHERE DO WE GO NEXT? The next step is to review the list and identify any needs which are not shown on the list or any projects which should be deleted from the list. Please address your comments to the Transportation Advisory Committee and send them to Randy Wooley, City Engineer, at Tigard City Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, OR 97223, 639-4171. f f s f i i br/16020 { i Page 3 r fi. JC:. a� • tw �� •� 4 0: NO rM --------- low es �� :• ,,� aaaa�aaai� • aaaaa� � i -:` November 5, 1987 N.P.O. 1 & 2 Projects Already Funded Scholls Ferry Rd. , between Cascade Ave. & Hwy. 217 ramp, right turn lane (ODOT) [C] Hall Blvd. at Burnham, signals and turn lane (ODOT and Fed.) [S] Hall Blvd. at McDonald, signals and turn lane (ODOT and City) [S,C] Hall Blvd. at Pacific Hwy. , intersection improvements (ODOT) [C] Greenburg Rd. at Tiedeman, signals (City and Fed.) [C] Greenburg Rd. at Tiedeman, right turn lane (City) [C] Greenburg Rd. at Center St. , intersection improvements (City) [S] Greenburg Rd. at Ash Creek, bridge widening (P.E. only) (City) [S] Tiedeman Ave. realignment south of Fanno Creek (City) [S] Transit Center on Commercial St. (Tri-Met) Projects Suqqested by WCTCC for ODOT Six-Year Plan Update By-pass connection from I-5 to Pacific Hwy. (Tualatin-Sherwood), to relieve through traffic on Pacific Hwy. and other roads. [C] Hall Blvd. , between Pacific Hwy. and McDonald Street, widening [S] Hwy. 217, between Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. and Greenburg Rd. , auxiliary lanes. [C] Current Needs Previously Identified Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins, intersection improvements [C] Main St. at Fanno Creek, bridge replacement [S,H] Main St. , pavement reconstruction and drainage improvements [R] Main St. , railroad crossing improvements [R] Main St. , at Burnham, intersection improvements [C] Main St. at Commercial, intersection improvements [C] Commercial St. , between Main and Hall, widening and reconstruction [S,R] Burnham St. , between Hall and Main, widening [S] Ash Ave. near Cresmer Dr . , complete missing half-street section [S] Tiedeman Ave. , between Greenburg Rd. and Fowler Junior High, widen for bike/pedestrian safety [S] Tiedeman Ave. at Fanno Creek, bridge replacement [S,H] Grant Ave. , between Tigard St. and Walnut, sidewalks and drainage [S] Grant Ave. at Fanno Creek, bridge replacement [S,H] Greenburg. Rd. , between Pacific Hwy. and Cascade Ave. , widening for turn lanes and bike/pedestrian safety improvements [S] Greenburg Rd. at Ash Creek, bridge widening (construction) [S] Greenburg Rd. at Cascade Ave. , signals and intersection improvements [C] Greenburg Rd. at Hwy. 217, capacity improvements for northbound traffic [C] Intersection improvements at North Dakota and Tiedeman [C] Cascade Ave. , between Greenburg and Scholls Ferry, widening and possible alignment improvements [S] 95th Avenue/Shady Lane, widening [S] McDonald St. , between Hall and 93rd, widen for bike/pedestrian safety and improve vertical alignment [S] McDonald St. , between 93rd and Pacific Hwy. , widen for bike/pedestrian safety [S] Tigard St. , between Main and Tiedeman, widening and drainage [S] Improved street name signing at major intersections [S] br/1602D Page 4 Future Needs Imrroved access to Main St. from Pacific Hwy. and from Greenburg Rd. [C] AsF Ave. , between Hill St. and Burnham St. , construct connection per the Comprehensive Plan [C] i k 3 jt t i f br/1602D i c Page 5 N.P.O. 3 (AND BULL MOUNTAIN CPOAir ) ,. Proiects Already Funded Pacific Hwy. at Canterbury/Bull Mtn. area, intersection improvements and signals (ODOT/MSTIP) [S] Projects Suggested by WCTCC for ODOT Six—Year Plan Update [See NPO 1 and 2 list] Current Needs Previously Identified Gaarde St. at Pacific Hwy. , intersection improvements [S,C] Walnut St. at Pacific Hwy. , capacity improvements [C] 110th Ave. , near Garden Park Pl. , widening and improved vertical alignment [S] Future Needs (including areas not presently under City jurisdiction 121st Ave. , between Walnut and Gaarde, widening [S] Gaarde St. , between 110th and 121st, widening [S] Fonner St. , between Walnut and 121st, reconstruction [S,R] Walnut St. , between Tiedeman and 135th, widening and improved vertical alignment [S] Walnut/Tiedeman/Fonner intersection improvements for safety and capacity [S,C] Bull Mtn. Rd. , widening, improved vertical alignment and possible improvements to horizontal alignement [S] Beef Bend Rd. , widening [S] Murray Blvd. , between Walnut and Gaarde, new roadway per Comprehensive Plan [C] Connection(s) between Murray/Gaarde extensions and Bull Mtn. Rd. [C] Develop and improve connections between Bull Mtn. Rd. and Beef Bend Rd. at 133rd Ave. and 150th Ave. , per Bull Mtn. Community Plan [C] Develop connections between Bull Mtn. Rd. and Scholls Ferry Rd. at Roshak Rd. and Sunrise Lane per Bull Mtn. Community Plan [C] br/1602D Page 6 N.P.O. 4 IiC Projects Already Funded I-5 at Hwy. 217/Kruse Way, interchange improvements (P.E. only) T) C] Hwy. 217 at Pacific Hwy., interchange improvements (P.E. only) (ODOT) C ) C ] Dartmouth St. , between 69th and Pacific Hwy. , new roadway (LID) [C] 72nd at Pacific Hwy. , , intersection improvements (P.E. only) (City) [S,C] Complete Triangle traffic plan (City, ODOT) [C] Park & Ride Lot in the vicinity of 72nd and Pacific Hwy (Tri-Met) [C] Projects Suggested by WCTCC for ODOT Six-Year Plan U ate I-5 at Hwy. 217/Kruse Way, interchange improvements (construction) [C] Hwy. 217 at Pacific Hwy., interchange improvements (construction) [C] [See also NPO 1 and 2 List] Current Needs Previously Identified 72nd at Pacific Hwy. , intersection improvements (construction) [S,C] 69th at Pacific Hwy. , intersection improvements [C] 72nd Ave., between Hampton and Pacific Hwy. , widening and improved vertical alignment [S] 66th Pkwy. , between Hampton and 66th, pavement reconstruction [R] Pacific Hwy. , between I-5 and Greanburg Rd. , capacity improvements [C] Future Needs Construction of a loop road, per Comprehensive Plan [C] Possible extension of Haines St. westward to 72nd Ave. [C] Intersection improvements and widening of collector streets as development occurs, in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Traffic Circulation Study prepared by ATEP [C] C br/1602D Page 7 N.P.O. 5 Projects Already Funded Hall Blvd. , between McDonald St. and Durham Rd. , shoulder bikeway improvements (ODOT) [S] Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , between Durham Rd. and Lower Boones Ferry Rd. , shoulder bikeway improvements (ODOT) [S] Durham Rd. , between Hall and Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , shoulder bikeway improvements (ODOT) [S] Durham Rd. at Hall Blvd. , westbound right turn lane (City) [C] Projects Suggested by WCTCC for ODOT Six—Year Plan Update Hall Blvd. , between Pacific Hwy. and McDonald St. , widening for capacity and safety improvement- [S,C] Hall Blvd./Durham Rd. , between McDonald St. and Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , widening for capacity and safety improvement [S,C] [See also NPO 4 List] Current Needs Previously Identified Bonita Rd. , between 72nd and Hall, widening and vertical alignment improvements [S] Bonita Rd. at Fanno Creek, bridge replacement [S,H] Bonita Rd. railroad crossing improvements [R] Durham Rd. at Hall Blvd. , intersection improvements and signals [C] 79th Ave. , between Bonita Rd. and Durham Rd. , widening and vertical alignment improvements [S] C Future Needs Durham Rd. extension between Upper Boones Ferry Rd. and 72nd [C] New street connection between Hunziker and Hall per Comprehensive Plan [C] Ross St. realignment at Hall Blvd. to eliminate offset from Sattler St. [S] br/1602D Page 8 N.P.O. 6 Projects Already Funded Pacific Hwy at Fisher Rd. , signals [S] [See also NPO 1 and 2, NPO 3, and NPO 5 Lists] Projects Suggested by WCTCC for ODOT Six—Year Plan Update [See NPO 5 List] Current Needs Previously Identified Durham Road, between 87th Ave. and Summerfield Dr. , widening to provide turn lanes and sidewalks, along with vertical alignment improvements [S] 92nd Ave. , between High School and Cook Park, safety improvements (walkways and sight distance) [S] Sattler St. , between Hall and 100th, widening to full standards [S] Walkway improvements in the vicinity of Twality and Templeton Schools [S] Naeve St. , widening and paving [S] Future Needs Possible new bridge connection between Tigard and Tualatin [C] l br/1602D Page 9 N.P.O: 7 Projects Already Funded - Scholls Ferry Rd. at Old Scholls Ferry Rd. , interim intesection improvements and signals (ODOT) [S] Scholls Ferry Rd. , between Fanno Creek and Murray Blvd. , widening and signals (ODOT/MSTIP) [C] 135th Ave. , between Scholls Ferry and 700' south of Morning Hill, reconstruction to minor collector standards (LID) [S] Projects Suggested by WCTCC for ODOT Six—Year Plan Update Supplemental funding for the Scholls (Fanno Creek—Murray) project [C] Current Needs Previously Identified North Dakota St. , between Tiedeman and 121st, widening for bike/pedestrian safety [S] North Dakota St. at Fanno Creek, bridge replacement [S,H] Tigard St. , between Tiedeman and 121st, widening for bike/pedestrian safety [S] Tigard St. at Fanno Creek, bridge replacement [S,H] 121st Ave. , between Scholls Ferry and Walnut, widening to collector street standards [S] Future Needs 130th Ave. , south of Scholls Ferry, develop a street connection in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan [C] Murray Blvd. , between Scholls Ferry Rd. and Walnut St. , construction of a new street in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan [C] br/16O2D Page 10 N.P.O. 8 (AND METZGER CPO) Projects Already Funded Hall Blvd. at Scholls Ferry Rd. , intersection improvements (ODOT) [C] Hall Blvd. at Washington Dr. , turn lane (ODOT) [S] Hall Blvd. , between Greenburg Rd. and Locust St. , shoulder bikeways (ODOT) [5] Hall Blvd. at Oak St., turn lanes (ODOT) [S] Hall Blvd. at Pfaffle St. , turn lane (ODOT) [S] Projects Suggested by WCTCC for ODOT Six—Year Plan Update Hall Blvd. , between Scholls Ferry Rd. and Pacific Hwy. , widening [S,C] [See Also NPO 1 and 2 and NPO 4 lists] Current Needs Previously Identified Pfaffle St., between 78th and Hall, widening and reconstruction [S,R] Locust St. , between Hall and Greenburg, widening and reconstruction, pedestrian safety improvements [S,R] Lincoln St. (93rd Ave. ), between Locust and Oak, construct a new street connection [C] Future Needs (Including Areas Not Presently under City Jurisdiction) Taylors Ferry Rd, extension to Oleson Rd. [C] 74th Ave. extension across Ash Creek [C] 80th Ave. , between Oak and Taylors Ferry Rd. , bike/pedestrian safety improvements [S] Oak St. , between Hall and 71st, widening [S] Locust St. , between Hall and 80th, widening [S] Greenburg Rd. , between Washington Square entrance 05 and Washington Square entrance N6, widening [C] Taylors Ferry Rd. , between 80th and 65th, improve to collector street standards br/16020 Page 11 AbE MDA Prersivt ..i 111111-1' tit 111 1111111 111 71 t ill 011 �, 111 711 711 T " !Rn 1 i I 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 � (� l � 11 S I { 1 �. 1 - 11�T I ' jml i_�1 C��n 1 I_�-� III I11�R1't�llilr(�41lllt)llll°itl+S�°1�1'�+IIi111l1i1p11'Jtlr�lltltltltlt�Rtltlllltti►It y NDTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED 3 4 _-_ S _ S_ .. 7 8 0 I .-- 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS WE TD .' THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL '" DRAWING. of sz ez "iz az sa eZ Ea zz Iz oz -si si Z1._-.I-J-__o!_6 e nelCuulunlunluuluutwul�n�lu�tjmtl)}�i 1 UAWIem ------------- MARCH: 7-- .d1990 ............... xk � _ � _ PROGRESS DOWNSy I TIGARD LEGEND �� 1� 'Ltilr GOLF COURSE I� F' �,r I I COMPREHENSIVE , PLAN z ,1 MAP C 3 ]�.RRID d 1 �rTr W T TRANSPORTATION ° � 1 - ORD. 83-24 G.a.ru. a a . — MODEC(TMAY 9 1983 - — N PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PROJECT 8 .. .� ..i�,.. .. , [ C I 1 f100 IONS NLC 3 f I Tli I lFYE4R 2000 -w ,rc r[ N .,stia .. 7 ; IL I71 �I I,PROJECTIONS 10010 ,a r a .,:. 11EXISTING STREETS _ � I6-- r�YEAR 1990 100 -SOI 4RTERIA;. _ \ 777PROJECTIONS I.WASH ING TON `;L �i. ��' _ '-CTYSOF TIGA RD,OREGON G VICINITY MINOR CUL:.ECtOH _,.__- SIO _7OM:IT .F fLA.NNING d_JENELOPMcNT_ ___ SIGNT RAIZ_ TRANSI SCALE I' 800' - FF 7 _ �. ��' �' _ I _ - �1 -- -- — =BEAV� RTON \'b' xj ,I — —ate — _ d \ 0 f�j = CITY 2 s 1`, T �^ \fa r �� °i --- � �✓�. �—� - ZD .-. p0 � _ yam'~ �` :..� �o•,y _i J .. .tom lI =� ---r T u�.1 LL�,.�� , t "� r- / ..a , I _ - — .. ✓..-L�1 C 1�.. O r _ I i r�. h { — I---'}T 1 � �1 I J u ]C \ T 2 t�7— ——----7� MQ TC NE ^JTH - rl- H-G-fr. — ,.x...11 _.� r--,,_ TOWNSHIP - liQUSN. . p / -,JC �a —1 _ e 0 L/00F L — _ ✓ '--11-_- _. - 260/ � _f�. -?p I-1-- ._?50 0 .�]��,I]�� __-I��. ��` -' :\''•'. � 'ti/ ' `?. •��70© E �r� E_'--� -v -190 -T_`,_ '�. •-� /%.;.. \\6y�0�,� ..' j I>,-.: -7 \ ,_� �— : _ - i - .. �� _ ,.0 BEES. - - h L-,•.�/ L_ CITY w \ LAKE _ G J 1 — — _ 6 — y� 95Q r 950 /iiiiaii :ice: �L—T--s � __ . y,, ^ L i _ l•. �� a - L Imo__ 200 /� I_. �l j.'� r-- --- IT-11UTY �I =rC�` -. - `� t �.. � ��,.. I��-.✓ =-J - 0 , I' _� JTEMPcL ON ELEM OFSCHOOL 200: _ - - _— _--...: w I --. -.--- - �. I' ---- r�•—,..� �_ - �, ��..._2p �_'—'rJn-' �-�. �._ .. � dal '�'v� ��-, lr �f�•- - j�{ O — G l /�� a_' _� ie.a• � "f'-1 .= �� ✓ m' t. r &3P 11 N r,. loso: a= .J _ �• "� r._ �ILea , 94'10 71GAND 950. f �r HIGH L' I_ �•�Sd \ �}-r {.r �\ m SCHOOL U.S A 150 l—. yA\-� �_ REATMENLJ / : _ SSS"' L �I� T PLANT - � / I I _ _ _ L o. `r �, � �- - T \ � !��'��' TJ J, � I `l..^ � CITis Y TY 0 FJ I --� I �� I ;a r; _ I ,� ��'L'' I I y _ _ —_ _ \IJURflA1Y1 --ATUALATIN REVISED MAY.MAY.199T - �VI1 lnlillil4giillli pll'III�In1rPl 111n11g111Rlnlfgi1g111p11�lrlp�qrinlllp{II111V111nn1{11111111'p1'Ilf'1111yIIPpPlipp'1'I'PIIfN9Rl11IN'IPIg11N, -.-. - - I' _ Ir fres.wrcl.co 2 3 1 5 8 T D D 0 II I 14 Is fTMic�puu of fK w c[rw O[ Px i, 2 L2 92 LE 2 R 12 LI CI 21 II 01 L Z 6 0 K E Di I LI YI • t O L I iul 4wlnnL In llwlleliw�l�.l ' I.,-I_.,__ ..,.I.• I�D14 1394 MAR-CH 1 7 - ,1990- 4 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council December 7, 1987 FROM: Cathy Wheatley-Deputy Recorder SUBJECT: Bull Mountain/[Valnut Study Discussion (Draft) Attached for Council discussion is the draft copy of the Bull Mountain/Walnut Study. Following City Council review, the report will be put into final form for release. j cw Attachment i C ` I i E ® pts . Vis BULL MUNTAIN/WALNUT STUDY 1987 y �o Awl BULL MOUNTAIN/WALNUT STUDY = Study Area The 'Bull Mountain/Walnut study area consists of approximately 2,045 acres of unincorporated Washington County located due west of the current limits of the city of Tigard. The area's northern boundary follows Old Scholls Ferry Road and the southern boundary follows Beef Bend Road to SW 150th Avenue. The Urban Growth Boundary marks the western limit of the study area. The study area contains 855 households with an approximate population of 2,150 persons. The current assessed value of property and residences totals $97, 184,500. This figure reflects only those properties appearing on the tax rolls as of February 1987, and does not include any reassessments or newly subdivided properties. Because of the rapid residential development now occurring in the Bull Mountain area it is not possible to determine the true assessed value of the study area from the standard sources. A reappraisal is currently being conducted by the Washington County Assessor and, applying a formula recommended by the Assessor's Office, the revenue estimates in this report are an attempt to show both the true present value of developable land as well as the present value of under—assessed property. The Assessor's Office expects to complete their appraisal by October 1987. i An� � S - n _ I�III lli111'111 II1111Ila1112� i tt111 3I1.11J ITIIY�mr_ I!l,_.lt iIR°1! NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED .1 r►-`� -I .�. I ►� � I [° � � ► I ►I I � I I I ' I�O .- t I 1 1 ala 1 ISI Ill IST (1 Ila 1 f 1 I a 1 .a 1 a 1 all 1 1 1 I YII I a 111 ill ill 1 1 1 I all DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - -- ORAWING. -_ _—_.- ------ — .- ---- ----- -_ OE 6Z 8Z LZ SZ S'Z bZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 BSI LI 91 @1'' 41 EI ZI II OI 6 8 1 9 5 b E Z tt I�Illlula�nlll)y�ypdgia�N[I!Y{�I(�atllNi 1 ,}�l u�11aS�laltl 11W,ut1!!a}altl�iN�l14 !F{ aatakaf�MfaltM .. 1aII11111�11NIiI11�ItIIII111�N11 I -- _ _—-----_-_-- MARCH n - r' v i � �- �,, ,.,� , ask .1mri, � ' Ymm- WIN MM=y ES9L R 4144 / / _ E!J'�!F!�!'► . _ •��-.1.��'�.►�•��►A••�_!•�� '�2'k¢� '` y�� iRS®7 %'^'Vo- t<�.v- � - y�y�i�< O�•Oi•!►i'►i: � �iii ��0�•i n '�` -, bbd...,. _ �!iii�-�-i:=' •O••i�l�l�l�•�!�•�!�•�!r�O•�0�- 1��•�"�i��•�!c►< ,r rd - - c iii��iiiii ii!i i•M"i i4i—0, 42•!'"`•ii �S. •: x, t y�•�•�•�•�•�•�•p rpm••�!�!�!�l��•�!�!�l�. •�•� s• •�•�►!�8. • �•► tAi-R: •i!ii!iiiiii►iiiiiii!i!i!ii - •r�-r� •�.•�••s.••f' ,, �� 3 •O�•�•ii!i!iii�ililiiiiiiii�- i!i`r ,; y � - , ►i`:•O�1000OOi�Oiiiiiii0•i• �•• r—• I-.. �� . `•k - RZ r row ♦ a celZIP♦f►!•!rIR:..•�• •!•!• •' 745-1, C ►iiii!iiiiiii�)!i!ii!i!iiii•!�i! � ! + �'• �►�� •• kPI !•NOR •�•!!�•!!!!•!• 7;f, !!•!•!• •!!i • •♦ ! � `� � fir•' '� IEG - a . _. .,,..... ..'_:•• .. -. i-si.Fps, ._. „ 4 Land Use and Development Patterns 1 Zoning in the study area is about 85 percent R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre) with a small amount of R-15 in the extreme northwestern corner and at the location of the Foxglove subdivision on Beef Bend Road near 150th Avenue. Other exceptions include an R-5 designation for the Hawk Ridge development on 150th Avenue and an R-3 designation for the Mountaingate subdivision in the Street of Dreams area. There is no commercial or industrial land in the study area. To better describe the development patterns in the study area, we have divided it into four subareas (see map 2) . Development- is most prominent in the Bull Mountain II subarea, which contains the Mountaingate subdivision, Phases I—IV, Foxglove Phases I and II, Sonoma Hills, Bull Mountain Park 03, and the Orcas 1 subdivisions. These subdivisions have been platted and approved, but do not currently appear on the tax rolls. After an indept-h study of the development in this area we have estimated the rate of growth and the assessed value revenues that could be generated in this area. The other subareas; Bull Mountain I, Bull Mountain III, and the Walnut area, are not experiencing the same rate of growth as Bull Mountain II, but all contain large amounts of developable acreage.` This includes approximately 780 acres of land currently under farm or forest land deferral. Land which is under deferral is typically valued at $350 to $1,000 per acre, which is contrasted with an average of $28,000 per lot for acreage which has been subdivided. E)vc AAAI Z-fdAA ffnAn NttL' n D AnPndLj -+ 5 i It t!L(Ilt I!t(ryt rlr�tlt tp tlIIIlt I!► 1�1 t!I l I i -- — ��--A -- — --_ Y �Ij_ (r1�T1mT�( 1(11 I! � l�R��1��t-�(lallt��(ti��t�lil�l��l�llllf Illl�lt(thljlr�rirltll(titltl'Jtll�tlt(tltllll�titlrlr�llrl►tl; NOTE: IF THIS NICROFILKD — _. .I. Z 3 4 -- _ 5 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN - 12 THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL DRAWING. OFFE 62 BE L1Z 92 SZ 42 E12 Z2 IZ OZ 61 BI Lf1 911 S!� bl EI- Z1 11^- 01 6 B egtlllillllll(IIIIIIIt1�111111ut�llllitl�ltlllenLh.�a" "��{•"'h„rN:t:.l,'ti�tNl�mi�tiE�?t�L'Lt11Lu!(IN!ltlukke{NftitslLlislbt»t;raN�Maa>aaiH �IIII : MARCH 17 1 , 1980 w. I r ` pp - 7 �.x.9a a0�� g8�; �R �e�}. 4'•µ x> "syY.7b`R tye9 3a` gRg ��, � ■r of pe1`:a,a�� op aiF •a''i 'a�l� ia'_'bL � �r KK6 $y�G 7 - .. 1 ��,�.�Pj,'►aF';w '9a-P fr'83ii X tl fY a h4 an k>a r,g'L„'.bb°o�'Q'"S•"sa"as"-., "' cx roa`o"sy&t' i"' }xts�„w„bso n"aasaa° ` ' �74_.Y,�nYCp�+9�j6#7opM�y'Y'�H A�Y,Q 4a}yK'-�+b 7>0`��N`t�w S9v3`R.Y•D .6$Oam'Sg b3®C�`c a t°•6 J*1 9 s V.Y aa. JR 7 Ft# a+ t'a-3�r A. �B nb t.>mbA3"aM�_a�'. ...... t'(e3�w 94&aP4D4YQ�a?DPQTRRYY a<> 3 L Y P� 6o a�6�6aK#°P #oDtYS.v.^Cu 'a dr:ot0.�(T 7 bEl�-S�Qn#.P��,$p�C�•+0.��Y+Y a,+A TK;A K a.a ID 4 h Yrod�?ti!p L 7j}¢' -a�+b'a el'.6"L C q.4Y4Q�E°oP 4.LrW C� .q.tom' P+e 7D•; Y b'a�'bF f 9r Y •gyp•' w o0 9.e..7Dv't 9`¢� a:Qy aew"�ooC"s•"9isY'°'�6�va9 4 x w'vyi�`sDa+av'.Fa?h,�,b�s ?.�• • r.�a�Q.+a`-eY s`D'4Y��,rr'a�,aY,Re..,a a.�,b a�•oa.°"�'�#ea°�"�,r' •'9•�c � ti;. ' .. tk'A h•?>$&-S�Co4P Y sa'4•9Y P-+a Co.p. a° d 9..7495, �a, .. r � •�W$'d'�d°-0aA�4'iY^D�Cc 3'�Y'P3nt`air�S�W'L.+b�C„+4;,P FQ�t"riiA "94G�C SA�6® ■� �'aw"�a�,A,�gr,F °`,�` t;#�iC�e9 .'�31�3RD0 VIM - ago or9. P.Qo"9e+ yai�R�y'v<z'+dW . ■ _e,`t' ■ ■■■1 _ i r4�Q ai m }marta S%x-rs Y.a°ad- «> �� „L�� / f� �- _. .■1�■■1. ■■■ .�^�9 r O4`+R�P 4Yd 4�f 2 Y�0 _'fit ZiB��'�� ■`. _: ■■� �•� 1 • J c t�`9!i k2� x 4a`' s 1t y / �� ►111111 11�i 1 a`L<o :2 °t�> t�+d �� .■►.l�`_�� ♦1♦ . ■�� gyp w9W'+=e%mv iF ;7 7 +9 q�rF d s993 �rr; Elf s� C. r 7". m r • � '' �� ■��b�?'•T^a,f>`. 9?aQg.as83 wi;tAl�t G9.C98RJ9Ss"D�'Ap��4'�'�G'at{4t b R9 aob Wis'g•tWy'Ca.6.s b°do.,�a},�'+6C•a>aySS<<°8+`>'aaA',B.'6a°',.'.S��.'"d's�->�Ysa�®7`•°4a:t�-�yY5 .9 "1 •RqR. ------ , :. _�, __ � � � ,�TY<>°n.g9t`f d�:1�xs•q,y 38 4 Y Fq"f 4.?.pSYq�y^? _ a'+b'aw,4d bwd�'- .... �' �?<t,��<>d':�Y fd r� S'YF'0",,g_ eY� sygQ�tq•��G•Y�a�pk,?�D,yxRi°vf6aRY3?. `'C"�babGo-Sd3�,.d. 1 °11 �a ve lu,gy,3 1•+ 7 d`,y fl+?a 6c+? ado Y"a x,w-°`�. 5... r,y a a 1¢X,9E'�°>6p,9�S�Sr�w a..o,a..i.tl R,C <t ?+S.k•,a+9Q;S,�w,a`yt a- Rip,. 1 1' iiilll `g�'C-�0.`;® P^�� T Se�t�'e'' a"'�:v 95n�Td?<y�'�.wOF+P��f^fid C.S.O•.9ARi'c'�i 1 1 +6:�}ae�0�'V`?�+bh Jt�9 y@aoD�,.%'RF'bw�Y%is4R5t Sf33<a:t�Y xH�?�^2�w A�Ya+i kib'S• 1 D"b°bQuQ`�Ag�'�taQD4,�"p4yY'eA�,4S?Q$aN.�b QE�.,?0w--0uA�S� f a�&.ct0�?�t R. k. O•'+F>; :.�A.'�4"644QDA,8.Y'S:tlaQ`# �w-0,"PQ:g,'G`p,& b�4JA@.p•R„a,,S 2 �' qc'• "„'by S :o`a�T .e . 3@�Q..g.,S• <�`9awa9aaw b'�6i'SwwRR'"S' C>,Q„J3aQt,¢wµQ ws°s°e?4, was�a bwy�,e aew°wQ o q+w K 3rd D v d '��a.":a$4 g3�•¢' ad'2y,�w«A�,.y.,oyw<pp.,a-50''Qd�e4%n�drdwwa�,9, o-"sw?`.»`a q Qs. a,w R d>••w<i °n e?_+9. �,y-sa°oo9a•rwa°¢py,,�"�x�A!A'^s a°a ya s��s�a,,y „'�w°`�.s•F�aa�,q�4a�,.,�A 17 _..- -... ... .9�.8�w�,yp��,Qdi•+b dD'R.Y w<P 4 g'a"�w+?FST,+..pj �� ■: IRS- OR � Si xa'4.r�^aw�'i-56 V.-Ir w,a,�fi aRspetS�•F_ ��4 �SR�»a+5a _:=�,�"!�/'�,/1■ '� �-� E`�'E:■ .�. .tr'ca o�+?� w}�eR yaaR sa< ;,#aD:.� ��i�: 4�d 4d Z -Yw WO 110 JL s<�a 39t�c2,Cf'ae'f �sr• 4 j y Alf` t w.Z6` �~•tf'. Y �`�.^ ,iliro :! � eyee !�s N"' s Iv!w1Ge Q�� ygv Jg7`11 1 c f tu.• �s &. , OWN 1111 1 •.1 1 • , 1 1• =77 I. 7,mi ilj,:.:l ! . Tm i I Natural Features affm Bull Mountain is a steep-sloped landform with a flat, elongated crest area. Elevation at the peak, just north of Bull Mountain Road and 144th Avenue near High Tor Drive, is approximately 700 feet. The northern and southern low land areas are more gently sloped and largely forested with a number of narrow, steep ravines which act as natural drainage channels. Drainage on the southern slope has been complicated by development, more specifically, installation of sewer lines which follow the natural channels. Given the sensitivity of the soil to disturbances of this nature, there is likely to be further erosion in this area without the implementation of a drainage management program. The northe m low land area is susceptible to flooding in the rainy season, a problem which also needs to be addressed before responsible development can occur. At present there is no drainage management service provided by Washington County. The Bull Mountain area has been designated a critical groundwater area since 1974, when it was determined that groundwater levels were dropping at a rapid rate. The State Water Resources Department has monitored the levels since 1974 and has recently determined that they are now returning to normal. It is f expected that the critical groundwater area designation will be rescinded in the near future, thereby lifting any restrictions that may accompany that i designation. Transportation Network The existing transportation network may be described as adequate for the current population, but it will need to be upgraded to handle increased capacity as development occurs. The only Principal Arterial in the study area is Pacific Highway, which intersects with Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road, both classified as major collectors. Scholls Ferry Road, which forms the northwestern boundary of the study area, is classified as a minor arterial. There is currently a plan to widen and add a turning lane to Scholls Ferry Road between the intersection of Old Scholls Ferry and Highway 217. This would relieve the congestion at the ill—designed intersection of Old and new Scholls Ferry Roads, as well as aiding the traffic flow to 217. 1 Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road both carry the most significant amounts of traffic from the Bull Mountain area. These roads are in need of widening and curve realignment in order to handle additional traffic as a result of development which will feed these roads in the Bull Mountain II area. Walnut Avenue is also a major collector and also intersects with Pacific Highway. The surface is in poor condition from the vicinity west of 121st and i is very poor at the intersection of 135th. Probably the worst road of the entire study area is 132nd which is in dire need of grading. i i There are currently- no bicycle or pedestrian networks within the study area but both the Washington County transportation plan and the Tigard park plan contain provisions for bike paths and pedestrian walkways. All streets within the study area, with the exception of private roads, are under the jurisdiction of Washington County. The County's policy in regards to transfer of jurisdiction is not set. At this time, the County prefers to retain jurisdiction of arterials and collectors, but transfer jurisdiction of local streets. Scholls Ferry Road is state-owned and maintained. ` I 40 J 7 '0 1 f 0 S800 5 0 4 0 4 32, Z.14 _q X 4? F 0 2ft 3 14" I I , I.., elm % 2 340 7b- t 9ZO 'go Cr It -XI 0 2,5 0 —a-0. Q* 410 0 0 4p f'gr 7 V) Cl) 60 7 1200 70J 1150 do, to to F 1,60-200. .% OA.t- 100-300 q J 0 .10 7 .450 to Ivo 'doodam 8001 460 100 100 _J a z 0 cog / ' - ` i C% %......dooddoodod", D '--IZOO 1100 1100 ............................................ 1400 1300 13100 raw "D 156 600 FIGURE 22 ashingtonLEGEND Projected PM Peak Hour *00— Volume by Direction Traffic Volumes ounty- QQ4 of Travel TIGARD-BULL MTN Area PUBLIC WORKS doon,Proposed Facility URBAN SERVICES Services in the unincorporated areas of Washington County are provided by a number of special service districts, some of which also serve area municipalities. Washington County "County 2000" Plan In order to cope with consistently under—funded urban services programs, Washington County has proposed a plan to provide road maintenance and police services to urban unincorporated areas until these areas annex to municipalities — a process the County views as inevitable. The County 2000 plan provides for "interim service" until 1992-93, at which time the County B c- expects annexation procedures to be in place for most unincorporated areas. �"4( The County 2000 plan is an attempt by Washington County to fit limited resources to service demands in view of population growth and the subsequent demands on urban services which result. Basically, the plan covers two areas which need immediate attention. Police Services The unincorporated areas of Washington County have an approximate population of 115,000 persons. Currently there are 56 sworn patrol officers to serve the areas. Because of increases in crime and a larger inmate population in the County jail facility, the Sheriff's Department expects the number of patrol officers to be reduced in order to serve the necessary duties at the detention facility. Currently the response time for priority 1 and 2 calls to the Sheriff's Office are in the neighborhood of 15 minutes or more. For priority 3 and 4 calls the response time is up to an hour. For some calls 0-ere is no response at all. The proposed Police Service District would increase the patrol officers by 84. Even this increase would not enable the County to provide police protection at the same level as municipalities which are adjacent to unincorporated areas. At the Boundary Commission public hearing on June 11, 1987, Washington County Sheriff, Bill Probstfield, acknowledged that the increase in patrol officers was necessary just to maintain police protection at a basic level. Because the Police Service District would be sunseted in five years the question was raised about job security and sense of commitment the "temporary" patrol officers would have. Probstfield's response was that they would undoubtedly be picked—up by municipalities who will annex the unincorporated areas by year 2000. This is the goal of County 2000: to provide what basic level of urban service resources will allow with the goal of encouraging annexation to logical service providers — municipalities. The enhanced sheriff patrol district will be funded by a voter—approved levy of $0.78 per 1,1000 assessed value for property owners. This translates into $67.88 per year for a single family dwelling valued at $87,000. Road Maintenance r Washington County has approximately 1,200 miles of roads under its jurisdiction. About 700 miles, or 58 percent, of these roads are local roads. Given the limited resources the county has for road maintenance, these local roads are the last priority for maintenance and improvement. The County 2000 response to the problem is to create a County Service District for local urban road maintenance which will, in effect, be a user fee. The County is developing a method for assessing and collecting these fees but a preliminary study shows that the average cost per household would total $60 per year. Sewer Sewer service is provided to the study, as all of Washington County, by the Unified Sewerage Agency. The only service within the study area is in the Bull Mountain II subarea. This area drains south to the Tualatin basin through the fling City area. Officials at USA predict that sewer mains leading from the study area are adequate for projected development in this subarea and it only remains for local improvement districts to form in order to provide service to the south face of the mountain. Development on the western portion of the mountain will require a pump station. Development on the north slope of the mountain is restricted by the lack of sewer lines in this vicinity. Lines will have to be installed from the Weir trunk to serve the area of Scholls Ferry Road, while the area north of 135th will be served by lines in the vicinity of Summer Lake. T-he Walnut area is virtually unsewered at this time with the exception of a r, small neighborhood which adjoins the City of Tigard, north of Wa'.nut Avenue. 6 s Water Water service is provided by the Tigard Water District. Currently, the Water District serves all developed areas and the master plan provides for service 4 reaching the entire study area as development occurs. x r yf}f Y Fire Protection e e The study area is served by the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District (TRFPD) and in the northeastern corner by Washington County Fire District #1. TRFPD has stations in downtown Tigard and south of King City. Washington 1 County N1 has a station just northwest of the study area at Reusser and Weir Roads. The response time is generally within five minutes throughout the study area, but improvement of the transportation network would shorten response. For those areas with fire hydrants, virtually all developed areas, the fire insurance rating is Class 3. For areas without fire hydrants the rating is Class 8 or 9. : 14 (:)Vc (sl ze T)OMMEr i _. Ie 11►�tll IIfIIIa fill III Ill III III llt 111 1fl T I ! ! 1 ! — II ._! _ !m 1 Ir ��- 1. jrle_� 1� � r � l.rril � l { I ! { � ii !� ii ! � li r i { I -1 � ( � { � � �r j m � .l. !1 T r f ]III I t t t t s ! r f i t ! ! r t t t t t t t e i i i � � i!i Jill i NOTE: IF THIS HICRDFILMED ! i . 2 3 4 _ J s_ - IQ DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. -- ---- . ote sz ez cz az sz ez tz zziz oz sr eilow ti el zt o s e ii-_._. -9 s _. b e a ! �mruuhw�unhw�uulq��nuixn{n�!{ '. t...L..d !. ! i,u it I�ttt iumt�u!�n .au•;=a....l... i....�....1 !... ...-'��-�A t111111L11i1! ; MARCH - • ��°L-;s�ss,� x a• � SSBS>its+baa a x3a�ac� �'t8�acr ��fC9aP3gptrd� vvs$•F� xea ab'®' SIRS as � $<.Sar �� a�t�t.s'98$�r�� 3a'a � ��lX d�ddd5d¢« •�� (R �,,, a vrgF iBtFaS SSdtdfEY4$ j� i��R. '�aada'b3�r �M�"'1,y�,N,raa�a35° S<�5��8"$�s4•aSaaSdddb et. !:� ,vs r.s ai $ SSaa•$aaaa ��Clt� ssg',,, '''F«R�� $35 � a eiero-sy,�9 a�•a+$SS,t3�aa.R. 1 V■1■ >fFe� x 'St 8c±r�s�as .,� tk�� ": "ao aatF{$er t�dt-$FS s sa'{ '' casae z._ SSdd3r$$$5� r- � . Ia�� .IsE�'4S�d�SS�` a�:radl{,aa t34� r dsF:3�§#r5�is�D�g$�8ed8°3$8�fYir:t seRtRtR�ia«4Sxsd{�Ss�d. �.. � , �• ` �"� a�2:E3{3io-Sr�`�say$B��S�;a'"`�a:siA�'$•$$s��s sR>+f4+S$'r�q ss AA`o-r r g: s'�s a{ � SSd;sCd$ct 83S 33.3&a.¢aaabaa A .. v gg S$5 a* rrtStS a¢ S,t$ba aaatrt{aaa,i f 4 4SRd� $SsbS■�:P'Af S 3%'1aa4 £'RBBB :s,ax+ 3.a�3s�t aaift R,�S{S'S 66.5 f5s'� "not 9 rla'tYSiS#S'fi�$��a5C8�kF�@55595�54$`D`P`s°#o Ss3`3`3`3.3 �� r 44 tr{S�yS>So-S$ >sti's'aa4'4''b)�#��"4+"�r�'F•"$°Sak�s�•.tfa�t �<e¢ad4 R sasaaas g.rYsvSr¢vS5€Kxxtr sus o>r RQ33Sac�a4 S'�AS&g$$Sa�R.$S8S333d� �, da#'F g, ar s.st 3RR4pgS$FSSSY3Sa$4..}aSfi4Rd d S ct 5 S 5 ao-DS44a$I't : s 6 a xi*`a`xaa 5r yraL{ $�bi4{gR daaaSaaaSSSP�,3�5$p¢8$SS$5$sxk�igrE or�ssssarsrtr <x$,s +a a �� $8356��vd$gb43 PSSS$S{S8a'i a¢ 4 4 4 E£t a 3v $8 Sia i4 a$4$R3RdS$Std eft�Crt d F< xx�a a 3r kv via i 36 A$x. �4:gS86�d'°a;tFr,�''D3'�gR@$ £sS+�•s?•gS4oa �i yr>o-¢�SQ�<`''�•eta?sr3� a'fi�fr48F 38 gaSa+E eS ba S z?aaa 3a r as o-g4S 3SSSa� $ct$�5$I$a$a5a5 a�RaF�RbS°S`S�3 53 ar�S4$SSStFtFR s=r u S33•d a 4�a•SS3g3Sda54ax'afSSSs. • i�""� _ , . .;3Rti�e?`e$�,'S„$$3aiis%�i�.?A,SSddo-'3•��•$4`S�t'r`* �` >sa�'e,l .s' d�5$SSaR �* � SaSR4rgSSS3 33*33:bY a s IMtoo 59 ��_ , 'e4e6 ?!t..if r•D o1' � 3et4 - ec sn aRs�as�gzf-r aaaaiaat ��♦ , � '� ��-�� E�'I�CSI �. 3'a�a:8aSaS°°{s{�R s aga8�f��¢aS`•' � �� ■■ � 53S]aaL 6S�s•�8aaaaa{ ,� �, t• , _— ��I■■i ak' 9P 4y?$F$s'D3�f�rA�gS I ` � ■�..� ♦ � �Gni ■■� ■� f ,■■ � :�$5�� AAR- 9i; NNIN Wing Fi% 89, own WE min ■S ! ��r'' a a8 MIN �� t� ♦, ♦yam=a a OR- N. . �1 RMl I t N }. � i:l.c ti�r�% ��♦ (� a —.ems p i r .. • � �� „{ e -.544. t .¢... ' ss3 ass ui 3 $ 3I t fBY •s. � nE � c 3ss.��f MEW": 4 I , .; ...;�. ,:..- •• .+rt�r.) srr<:. .n,..e4! it «+ r'>'r, •,�.f-...t: ,+..'.:'.(, '3 t.;..i• ,h .i,- gel 11111 lima f " min , A- MMHEM x339 RS1 21 ifRFSRti6F� .� aM�■' ��1 • 10 IL as Imo© § a'x .# � �I M1�' � jL ■■�� iii■�l �. � � � NON BE M. MA -�'C�� .■Ill�i`i1 ' �� _l�■1 t3' � m acr a ;� �cif■■ ./ ��,�G��" � � ` � � :� s►1■11�� ; ��'�.� ■�1- �� _�'Ire� __ , 111■ � �`�c �`�t`�h2,�s� i�ivuu f��p ♦moi♦ .-� �' {�� y�, �� ?ss ca3 .• .., .517. ., I' I Y � 1 _ � t •.1.• :... i i L:ir_..}1.:'l ilf' iii it„1 fr.,, t't {I.,f 1 . :r.it - Ap �. Planning and Development Services Planning and development services are currently provided by the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation in conjunction with the Neighborhood Citizen Participation Organization for Bull Mountain. Their collaboration has produced a community plan for Bull Mountain which is very general in nature but prescribes some specific guidelines for development in this area. School Districts Tigard School District 23J serves most of the study area. Beaverton School District 048 serves the northwestern portion of the Bull Mountain III subarea. District 23J levies $12.10 per $1,000 assessed value while - ) Beaverton #48 levies $14.10 per $1,000. Parks and Recreation There are currently no parks or recreational facilities in the study area. Those residents who live in the portion of Bull Mountain III within Tax District 48 have access to facilities in the Tualatin hills Park and Recreation District, while all have access to `Tigard's Summer Lake Park and other facilities within the Tigard park system. The Tigard Park Plan provides for park facilities consisting of ten acres per 1,000 residents. The Park Plan has identified some area which would be suitable for parks in the study area. i Libraries The study area, as all of Washington County, has access to the Washington County Cooperative Library System. The Tigard Library is part of this system. Other Services There are virtually no street lights in the study area, negating tt•e existence of a Street Lighting District. Storm drainage management is also nonexistent. i i REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES In order to analyze the revenue and expenditure potentials for the study area, a detailed study was conducted using information provided by Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, the Washington County Assessor's Office, the regional Metropolitan Service District, and the Portland State Center for Population Research. Using this information we were able to determine the assessed value of the property in the study +%rea, the population, the number of households, total acreage, vacant and buildable acreage, and acreage currently under farm and forest deferral. From this information, projections were made in revenue from assessed property value and extrapolated to include revenues from non—property tax sources. These projections were also based on development patterns within the study area. After conferring with County subdivision personnel and local developers, we have estimated the rate of development. This procedure was necessary in view of the rapid development in the Bull Mountain II subarea in order to calculate the assessed value since this information is not yet available from the standard sources. Population projections were calculated from the number of households which will result ' from current development. Our projections for population at density, which for our purposes is labeled "Year 2000," may differ from the projections by Metro by 2005. Our information is based on a model that differs from that of Metro and was created for a more specific study with more - E local information. Metro will be updating its information in the spring of 1988 and will be soliciting projections from local areas in order to adjust its regional model for population projections. n In projecting revenue/expenditure estimates, 1987 dollar values were used. No attempt was made to estimate inflation. sb/0026a/002a i 1 c t I i i I O b 1C) b P 0 Q N In m P P n d Ll)'+ d o m S S b N Ln w� N P N n P m .•n m P m N b In m n m.+ O O mcn LIZ)n nOC O bmf m OC bN NS ll O o bM vOMn O P m Ln m )o b �"� N m P m m M n V) N m b d O d O M d M N b )!) b N)11 rI M N m m d to n Ln N N P m �+ C• 0 v Ul 8n p m N 'b'^ f N •••' N � bMnNmd PmOMmN db )[) fd0 b - d 'oPn Oan MOIN dP n m A M n n d n m !) N 1[1 N b d n n m P '+ b .•) M M b n M b O) N b n N .11 m m P .� a, f m P m .-) N r m O n d N N O N .r m d 0 0 M On 10t1 .P+ M N - O b CQ n LO )C) N N N M n M1 N �O M m N r+ N ch co 1c; m N O f !1 P N b m .••� m d d Lnm K1 M O MW �+ N m Q d n P n m N �'^ b Ln m P N b N �+ m O m n In P d Cl d In d m O O n m N 14 d )I) P b Q P M N n P n P N O In In P d N t� )f1 1••) O N K) )f1 m b p M )fl m )o O 1fl M b - O) f )!1 M n d N 8 �"� M )A n h M O d P d M f d o m P A n < P .ni '+ b d )o n N m N ~ C L P n W d f � d y P A Q) b P N d M me+ m m O P J) f f f �n Ln w �••� Co P n CO N b �+ w m N b � O d N P m b f N n cV IA P m M m N �+ O^� f O P T f N P P 0 C b O b m N 1fl �+ m f ♦ m m m O M n d N N d m )!1 j .•� N b b 'n N Ih n ^ f �'+ N d O m m n )n N m N O m b m n d N cz f f M P '•9'� Y P b b m C M Go ) f b Z O \ m Go' r c pb NPPd )!1 Oco In In O ,nn Nbb QPn � NP NO )c+ b K b M N n b ••+ n d C v.) M m '+ b O "" d d o) d N .••� M .•+ m U, .•) n f M m N b .••)N P P N )f) O P M 1 a' Ln eq P In an N .. O d m )!) n e n d CIP •.• •., a P ~ C m a m w M M oc m ., c m 0 Yj e6 $ Ln r. r,nmfuO, P SfNIn 8O)P to d)C1m S .P•) Tg C4 $anNnd r n Ili N N 1f1 n m m m M P M f 1. \ f N P N n f O b f f n n P d n d N M M O P n N O N M �•'' Q' m M N M P . ..+ y b T N r n P ' m OI 7 , u,l n h .mi l 3 acj Go 2 2 pO FD f6 a ey m H tG a) '� m 8 W > C 7 > C 7 H > C C H > O C Y >� Ci .0 C .�+..0. r d ~'•O.�.. s) m £ V .o n m 7 v h m ra i a o y m d 1 H d O Y a 0 > £ m O Y O a > m 0 0 Y m a 7 u 0 Y a a 7 b m £ L )Q 7 �+ a N es F n 0�••� C C D: m e+ 6.+ C C C r) m C L K h m.•� C C EE 0 m n 7 0 a 0 7 m a A 7 G7 GY h 7 G > GY " = G > O.Y H N 7 G> GY " 6> O.Y \ C" O 0 a X a A 0 0 0 x a H o O O O X a H �+ C O a x m > O O m x a A HCSGK WZ H4= cW2 HCSG KWZ H 6S6CCW Z HQSa. 2 n I; i Jill i m I v O O C O .p•� O v o O N \ < ti N Ln ^� c O+ M N n pO n �S M v v In I v �7 O. O O O O+ m lo LO m O O b Z O \ N O co N m N M M n n N N n �G M T O O v .� In O rn O p lo c7I lo M P In O o, C n c ++ o M T n Q M T V V O O M M m m O N O, i Q N O 1n \ f ca m O cc N 1n IO M a M ti L L a 4_ d o K s� L O IO .+ a O m m N -w C m �O M1 •+ \ N O a m y ►•i Q N n 'I Q eE C = M T b L m d T 4o y 6 C O y a y 2 m L ., .Qi 4- 6 m W n O 8 S e \ d h• m n m N'f \ N E 7 LZ m 4n Q N M IQ IL ? N a, .r f�{ T M b a � w d � n .d a V A 'o ton > r .w d -w a a 4.1 is n M ¢m 3 Q O rp 1 h rOi L a `O L ed Ca @ \ 9 m C i u v .�, RSO Ly -C ¢ � O ¢ o a a rt > > a s+ 4I ON mN�n U W y C . . v M 0. n�bn ••+N O L ra y O r• OD w OD k O w w b o co� CD c 4 N —11 ful ?� .A c0 :j 41 .a > O $4� x W b a) o. rn --- aD a, 43 O (L) --------------_----------- to 00 ca w = m a7 P4 a G M O ddE- z04 .4 u u n 1 � d H a4 I u En 0 1 ' 1 I 1 1 E- O H I ca CD I 1 E I w 1 C I ON p, yG E- 41 co ; a>1 X O 04 i N t4 d O W t u I to O I 1 co I i_04 CD ------------- � --------- ----------- --------------- F-I s C) A I U � I I I I I 1 I 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 m 1 1 c0 I > I I I .moi 'O O I j OHO= !A O 1 co m to 1 $+ rn a X I > O to Kf vi O rr O O`r; N N yJ — - } CO - -- 0 wO� - -- -- -- 34Ec°, v).o d s i 4 (•: 00 F:• ..... Z ..........._ r::.::.•...••::::::::::. (' 'r: :• :• i :•::•i:•:'r:.;:•}:•:::•:::. to :.:. Ln C4 co uie:IunoW TTng cn zami II ute:junoW TTng PQ. 6 ^ ■www■®wwta�wwlw o 1 I rn II uie]unoW TTng r-4 aha � �-+ •.;. .......:•:.. , to CL. A �•� i Ul cy.. 1` 1 t i S i Tez-3uapisag pie$i1, -anuTEM ,�-I o 00= w ra $4 U) aa) as li a x < vs O to tn CD �. CJ N N .•.-� .•-•� O 4.3 J.l to o x a.o $4 to-- -- a E+ i9 E i® N O ON . 1 t ti z O I a, o � . e � A U r � e r 00 CJ e ca 04 V) 00 r ■ o• _ I 00 c �e r 00 r H do H H H H H co � v C C C co co 4 u E 41 c C ri r-1 r--1 U rl co go -- 3 LL. O f O y: O Co — O O O- '- - to -.T c7 t j � o0 N ii P � y 1 T P O P Y ~ NpL < M W ~ C C u p7 CCo S T � 7 W pp O G v v O Go 7 1 h N • � P d 1 P V b P N OL V M Y Y \Y C C N N 7 m co_ — 8_ o CD ® , - cl e i Go . rn € i - I c 0 i I- � I : W W En � ! i c H � • � f cr% t, ao � •° C) o� co Q IC44 1 a N d e �� N d , k 1 0 r-4 p , w rn • , a `W 0 .01 op (D 00 H H H i C GD CQ rQ CQ i 3 404. -- — -- in ---= O - -- Ln O O _ 'cn o i i E i i I i { (s f 7 IF f APPENDIX i i f E i i a E ji t i i 1• .•A • CL v m v • v v � •1 m coO O N O In O N P N P O ly7 N b K O f m O In .�. O N m b �� m O f Vi 8 p P P .N-r .fir N O0 N .••1 .w N OD m \ O m f a O N b n N 1 f\ f f K b P N m M b n mC" b f� t� O m O IA O 111 O f m m 111 Io CD f 11 b 1co f O b ^ .mr m .�•� f N N m n 111 CD \ r N 111 CD •••1 M N O O ' f n en .. P n n n f O 111 f P m b P v• v v b Z v U M N O N 111 .fl m m lo O 8 b P P g m m :; 1. CD P f .Nq f .Nq N n O � f i N a N all N d P n n n .-• v M b C O O f P w 111 ri:. Ifl P M 1� M DD b O 10 f 10 CD m \ f n m f Ifl DD DD K N N O ' .w P m O S f Q N b P U N m m b h v v v v Z m f to O m O m O O O O O Q • N ED m f� m m b O �O N b e4 f 'N 4p f f ;e4 b M K 111 m W f N cD ^ 0 f P M es! .•u N ;. � 11 Ib m I �' N .^ ot •r X11 f 11 6 N m M b v v v v Z r f P m b m b O N O!n Pn O O 8 O O O O yI Q i m — A N O b b f b O I . ' a m f r11 f� N m K N N .+ N 1 ti � N !� Ol in 111 n d O n N •+ Z N C� v a 0_ x 11 -P" d x e w O w d aV. _ O. C 4v ' ~ O •wm N K x e 18i F ~ V V 16- o n a v c o LO Aj S A r 6 .fir p1 9 1T e6 7 I 1 po 6 F- 2 O. 10 g o a .O n P V cc* J P+ V a m 6 I I .•+ rZ - N In - LI v m tfn m f O M . I N b N b N b O� .•� 1 f N m to M \ .•� f .•� N m In • u O b •� l �Ii N 1 I ' Ip, I f , N 1 I m v O m f .•� f �Lf f f N ch O O� N f b .•� M N �. N n N OD O O I N .� f !n n u M � I rl 1 m P N v InCIO N t(1{. All N 1 i 1 { I � E 0 m 0 n O co n d1 mN I P O— O b N m M N f f j I N f b m b "n f m 1 k F (t l n 47 A N m 1 m 0 O O m nI Mf m N O O 0 m b N co m N f f m N f b c b n f \ m n 1A M N b N N u co i n { �w k mao O n O O to n elf m N ` P — v f b CD b n f \ M f( m o o • n x � L ..Oi I it io Y w ' o .. .. I ! y n N 0 m0 le ry _ A H dQ. N X C O v • t v Y M Y S t y I { ' ...tr o .. e w o r. I LOoo AA 6 a a 0 > L Y w A MOis w N e4 Q _.... V •pC O a� �. s n \ II _ W p d� v v J ►� M y N 6. G � �' 1 ! t 1 1 E I N O m m m m m m m O O O O $ p O 0 C O I O F O v C-4 x T O O N O O O+ M M �� # W O O rf Ch T W O O- m ` O N LOm rl Ln i 1 -p n O� m r1 N 1� O� T �O 10 1� 1' M r10" ^� N e n T N i 1 v 1 1 84 1 1 v + + .moi V v QQv QQv QQv oQv { 10 m fi I a �o• n � '� 4 g � 8 a m e n ! I•t n n $ C% h O N T rI r+ N T N N ~ ^ ^ K O O D O O O t M Mm 0 ` p m • V v + + V v V V N O1 m co C14 V V V V V V A ^ [ m O 1 n o $ 8 ZS 25 $ 8 o m 1 Nm N P N M r N r1 M FF! ^ 7 f MPP4'1 M C4 0 11 V + {�{ v V Q7^V�r1 N V V F • , O� P CA - S v $ m M !� t 1 Cy O �o VVV VVVRy O r1 M p V O M r m O `G N N m p f .moi A N .-1 bl L M L d t N �+ + + O OI v v C m O M Y VV �. V rf 10 O p m w w u M m 0% I • m M •O w C C 4.0 7 DI m g g Q a W r - - e rt •.+ A A 7 N �I Q►fl C d 1{ m M on M w > N 2 w 7 s vw ¢ uV' O g o "dam"atOi Qp � p S �t w N 7 N M �7f N r) r1 8 8+ N 7k .•O•� !6 '>r LOO N n n L I p r+ ..Oi aV A O w + + + co v + + 4 + ¢Q d p 44 q■ ,e .6 I.!---J A — O. O N Yr n ri Q rig ri o N tOtf c- ( a AS 6 0 4 O N C r•1 'O.[ v r� N g N N in v n < L Y ..0 Y d 1A a 110 V%O K�O v v A V!� X Oi vN (�W u �+ O CCs■ tl 1fF K O1� AA OQ Kw� N trf Be KBO .� KM K LL 8 Y 1�c va N U N p Q U 06 i V N v v v n 10 b n O m In 0m 0M,O M b O m c n c n f a Z m ^' m ' f O, m m M m b M N Q m b m b m ,ff N N M In m n N n m "� M n 1 � f I � n .if v < b a a w M M b b !`O'1 .Nam c" m b Z b f n I 1 at O Ln b n O lif 1' O, .bi 1A 1fl n O "� en t N m m I O b n 1 .-. 0 i. f O ,!1 f O! 1 I , '+ f •-� N 6 f m b O� O b f b N b n \ 1A m M f Ln m m f .N., N �-, m O' f b N O b O� n n n U I: m N f ' O. OI N b O! H M M b V V V V O b O n O .w T 2 •"' M m f f n O O� n O N m f b f m O O ` 1t;1 OQi �e1 N M m N M m N b N �..... _..�.. - N m O 0 •y n n n C7 N m T b y v v v v T N N N m m O m f n n 6 b N f OI O M O f m m n .+ N f M M N m b 1e1 ^' m M1 O N " M f � Ifl N b -. f J1 Ifl m .+ m m N n eV 0. -r U O ^' f 6 Z N M M b � O O O n O, N N m M In f m f ch 2 b f in a b b f sn c N P N f Ifl n N f ' m In v n m N r M n n I < •+ •+ N m •a a m m r L eD •a. V ,l1 A .n .n N ` w..+ a n O f m O O N O •■ n ,n O V f N 0% l f d w C d M „may O w v S S C d M i Y ^ QI Ic E� ~ X � R F• A L �6� 7 2 O Q _ w l 2 F d t� F• d d C C a 8 d Md{ w 16 a - ¢ a - G~. , Y d O O Ode 4 n id.• On '•' .� ..�. OC tW! !W- 32 t7i w O� O0e n) oa U N J Hf t7 d C7 2 2 6 N �' ¢ w I I QQ � cc C4 rl f f N v ^ m Q N n m M N C M N b N N b INn \ f f M m N O I I b u .. b n . 1 m M N OI Mf v In b 0 10 T In n N 10 M �• .-0 Q 10 !n m M < b Q b r1 OI N n ti N Itl In M a f m w ; P M y f H N f -w M N co rln f N N b rl I�I� • I 1 OI OI n f N O M M M .� OI \ O' ^. f O 0 O. In m O u n p, m mmti n f O b� .b+ In f m y t4 b N N M m N m \ m M � b u cD M m b M O m N p b A N P r n v n 8 f N n \ M m 'r n In N N .+ b OI N V f n ^ i In n _ O O n In In C 9 N N m d C M U N .9i W w v Pt v U N n O 0 H JA AA a E `, v �,_- --aar- o o _chi . co 04 d f O o N V ;L Cpp N cn 00 at 00 �cX e 0 O °' N .O N N N $ g I .J1 N n 1 v v N Ch .O OI O 04 Le) m ti N 11f n \ b I i• M O n .o • .nr f N N LL1 I m ti f I I IK K v v n 8 O m n O N O. f O. M f 1 1 � n I ti o7 A f cl O. m \ 1 0 o, M ` Iv e o .t. V ol co c to :°cc co o f m u v d/ \ I 1 n m n n H n f .ni .�+V m .moi m N M d T I I 4• Y a++ � A C O V a Y o a # m W m UM d l c4 A m O 7 M � N ~ A a to ~ N a L n y a v mom. t as 04 w f 111 w n �O , a O d L N ? w C d V - 7 V u L— c A A L w ..Oi = ar 1y� . AJ O. ON 4 O 7N� V W sG .-Ai O co 0 I i Q CL. N M v v v pQ pp 8 QQ r O O O O O `i f N O O 8 N (. Ln OLn Ln ^ 8 $ O f b n Of O Of O � N O N f f O .�• M M f f0 N M O .-• n Q O c n n ci n f f b G N M M v v v m f Mm m b m b f f n tti M b ;. • N O• Of T Of N M Q N O N W) m ftf m O• r n 1 O47, "• •'• N M M N It1 .'•� M N f 1 a h E 'r O a, M cL N M M 1 V v V I 1 • m M Of b I I M n ^• M f fn 6n b m b m O O f of n K L` PI N N en T m Of n .Ni M f N O N •f1 yI ` i M .nr 1 1o .. In 8p .r .r N M M N f�f '•" I m f I 1 n to S v Of N b O { r• M M b v v v V I I SS` • I 3 1 m m M mf b m b m O O •. +I nN+ rl 11 O f N O N 0 x M b n • pf .� N M N N in n _ (1,•f p N b a �' I v v en v V t m a n f 0 O b m b m O O C f f n ¢ M� f .+ N V to Of � o% M f N O N N Z A fA ` O 1 Of M n M fA n vi 1 ap .+ fr m n t n I I F n v { fj111 o N f N M M b I V V V v • m N Of b 1 s o7f m O m O O f f f n 6 M n n 0 n Of flf ffl .Ni M f N O N f(1 2 �` , C1 O .• wn N M M N rA "•• b '4 � I n I L • U f N M O O N O .� N C t a o c n a C O cc f I O M � W! fn ^I. '�'� yP4 Aj 4 & e a c g N i a—a off-=-4 _`O„ 0 r 'a g , g cp -cc pl A. P V M N V a Z 3 OL. & FO m ¢ f - f t t t { Q N V O V ti Q 10 V n'1 � 117 Q C N N \\� � 1 •' rl .•1 f u O .r A a Ch d l l i I I I I i t �E 1 I rj 1 Q 1 • m 1 . r 1 • 1 I It � 1 'coo 1 . 1 t n m y a 8 In ♦ m N /.7 N eel b N N n 4" u 111 ,^ r w , L 6 a, I I n A Kf Il7 C I N ae GIx v d N0 9 I) C GM v _ W 1 v U A 9 O OI t L 6 L r n9•. N 0 L4Ea M Y V y 00 d N m _� a _ L w- wo S w - _- ____ aul or i a7— _ L a _- O ._.sAJ s Fay c— Y ro. �, v w i+ s I w M 0 0 7t n q 7 c 6 G y t uJ • rf t m 80 O .ti 00 O O b m N p m 10 CD O n 2 N N p f n E O f N Y Q \ O. m Y m 0 O .! m C O L 1 N m 9 N N co n n O n m m m � • o.tZ C o• m N K ^m teff tai i, n t 1 m V M V V V Lo t V G N In A QQb QQb p O O O O M r . \ n p�O.. .y m O m b O Q O t� L1 O b f W:n O. bi O f T - g CIDJI '�'� e P.^ m u N N N b %00 In " N ` O n ¢ m V " K _K K M K s m In m it t t v t v m V v v t ^ T ^ p p Q p b 1f1 X11 t Go pQ a pQ f Op S 8 a p N O.Oa N O ♦ O �n m i P.: -co Q O .(1 O. m r m 0 U) m �_ b f N N b f N N O C3 W In Ln T N N n r` T " v v V i rn a a a n t I nC84r T n ON \ • m n os.o om m go N O O e m an d .fo f Ql �f(f .Ni Go n N C C4 O .0.. .r v m i v ^' + ►e V a + co 8 " N O m m � ' b u Y .. TsOm pO b \!f n tr .ti 14-0 N O m m N n w Ail 1 r 3. N 8 8 Yd. Y 1 q (� .. � o I� .E m n u O ♦ a. r m g m n 15 m m Kf E 7 L.+ m n b 0 In a .» T f m N 13�w w N n .moi d CP v L u w ,n� 79 u c¢ 1 n n d L • C L v II d wI w.�. d /6 0 T ^ 4 6 L L O L C -� ^ d7 ry^OOi .�+^m cm v 2 ¢ w 1 4 wm d wn Y O dN 7• O) O� O -11+ N L C. O .y N ¢ A ---0� �- +J 1{ ' N n C*!V m o m O ow Y co O. a- O. Aj C w 4 O L 1 °C p o--m m m o. a m m w "i^ 1 CL ot f ¢ ¢ ayi t3 ►� d° 60 i I ,. U N v v b CLat C4 -KL v v m O O 10 b O m 1C1 N n 8 1i Lf) .Ni Ln N 0 .0 In Ni p b Ob+ O b O .•' .N•' � M N m N N N O \ N 111 111 N f O 1A v U C. N v v v v v n a+ b b ~ b b 8 M 8 N O O N O n M 01 M N 11f tO M 1LOI n m N m 01 n a b f 1A n f n n n 01 f n 8 b 01 111 m 1 111 111 f N N .� O N 1 T .-� m '••' N N n 01 N f .•1 n f O 111 f CL n N b 01 0 C C 10 W m N Q N f v 01 f 8 1(1 a N b N n u1 M 01 m f f b 01 O 111 .Ni N .•� .ti 01 m 1\A 1 m N P as O N 01 ti I n n n U n asa v d 01 N b m m %0 O f N efn 8 LonQQQ o Q p b O N ,p f N v 1A O 11f 8 N 01 1A O a f N ti n m N .� 0) .r w I O N b a U v v m 10 CL v v 1 i ' m O mm as m f b .•1 8D, N N 1 � N ? m b O N s O. m m m f n b et N sA O O b m p f m m b N M O N .� n m In N 1 j N n ' G , ac v en 1n ,p 1�' f � v v v I it • n Af m N m n e N n Ql 3 N N a ® I 1 01 1(1 N n I 1 A 1.•ai � I � , r U n a Li 111$ N m O O N p .r ^ 7 1 C C 1 M. ' C t v d ' w C .moi +S 41 X w d a+.q+ v L _ E K X 14 7 S N w G L L __d d C i w w w -r1 r-1 O. O. C O y Y H L y O C L o0 i d b _ d 6 1 R Y j _adi C 4 d B ami Y ..Qi Y n in W Z •"� •moi �� LO t e1 Ln 8 N Lf) a1 m m M M tp N k N Ln N b /p b ' n N Ln N M f N m y }} t O; N N f bO O N t .-1 m w o ♦ a ,It n - 1I N b a m t t m Kf n �b•1 M N ♦ tt N u • 3 n ~ .a.1 v In b N p N N •••� f d N ♦ O m 10 m a m m a n n Nb a Lnn .ti b f N n m 1 ti ti N t N {}!}t i O f A ^ p O f aD N O N a4DNO v O 1701 12m1 m b b to 1!f 17f O O ? 1p m 1a N N M O t n • a f m a v 1n M +� f m m .� f • • 171 N b ► a m It 1n a b m O 1n b N ♦ .�-1 N .fn u 1 f t�f p) p.� N _ lo rl n 'n v n m N N N ♦ M m •- _ O • 1Sf n ti N m 1n f • t � w ♦ --1 N .m.1 a i I• E n � L 1 ia•1 Q 'f't' y 1t1 1On 1i' N C 1' v U N O .moi W 1 [ t1 n v C Y.1 �-• K L L 'O O r•+ f Y d •� • O AA -•1 C A v M 1 1 t t Y C061 -ui . Y d O d Np L ; tan •r L L O C 7 0 C7 8-U d Aj 6 •- f n T O - n•1 O Vp oz W - Y �0 pc b oe 6 {yN{y�7O O �_ op C y--•-t O p� W f11 e v v J f.7 10- M v' V G a u w 11 jf lr%JL tree[ of .Drees only a start for area BY MARTHA ALLEN _ � apparent hostility toward the devel' C,* P-Miaw.The orpow" , opment.At a= . held for.area res TIGARD —More than 100,000 idents on the home show site jus eople are expected to attend the 2 before the show's opening,she said reel of Dreams home show this many comments reflected wonder .onth on Bull Mountain, but area STREET OF DREAMS about the beauty and size of th( residents and city officials are look- DIRECTION MAP O homes and speculation about wh< ing beyond the summer traffic to the the new residents would be ffi development's long-range signif- 4 'These people will be our neigh Cance for the community. 10 bors;'she said. City officials say they have no immediate plans to capitalize on the borhoods,would make a fine addi $5 million development or the traffic tion to the city,according to Bin it will generate.But city representa- TIGARD 3Q Monahan,Tigard director of tom tives and members of the local m"Me fact that that construction if development. neighborhood association agree that 7 'Th taking place in as area that wiT become Tigard Is a positive thing,' Five other Monahan said."It carries a certair V amount of prestige,and the addictor subdivisions have Q of those neighborhoods will create high-quality housing and add a been approved. A higher level of diversity to our hour $' ing opportunities." BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD Monahan suggested that the the subdivision is just a taste of Street of Dreams development could things to come. 1%rtd. spur more high-cost development on Five other subdivisions on Bull MOUNTAIN Bull Mountain. "Though it is Mountain— GATE already occurrin&this could stimu• e late more in the near fixture and may nprompt more annexations sooner. prov y as ngton County ea It's natural for those neighborhoods within the last 20 months.With ant 0 O to want to annex to the city for serve eye on the development just outside STREET OF = toes Its door. the city has undertaken a DREAMS Y Tigard officials may be proud of study of the area that may be a prel- RO having the show in their area, ude to annexation. Froude conceded.But she added:"I "We're very pleased to have the think the Street of Dreams means treet of Dreams In our communi- something different to the people 4 said Tigard Mayor Tom Brian. who live here now.It's one small , _4ven though that area is not within street in the Mountain Gate subdivi- our city limits.the people who live "We are gathering data, so that vided services vs.county service dis- sion, which will have 205 houses Owe will shop and to to school in when the time comes,everybody can tricts. when it's all built. And Mountain Tigard.We feel the Bull Mountain make better decisions" Froude said the citizens' group Gate is only one of five major subdi- h Bart of the larger Tigard tom- mu The Street of Dreams show, and had not taken an official stance on visions planned. com- munity.- the surrounding subdivisions. the question of annexation by "It's like this is just the first wave And It may someday be a part of which are in various stages of plan- Tigard or any other city. of a whole flood of developments." Brian was quick enla squ Tigard city, though ning, are in unincorporated Froude said she was uncertain Brick to point out that the one Washington County. County resi. what effect the Street of Dreams VaIr-Dot phase Bun Mean ■tene of an 'exation t area stay_ dents who live outside cities will would have on the people living on avote this fall on whether to form Bull Mountain.though there was no { "We're not Interested in forcing three service districts to provide any annexations."he said."I do feel urban services—one to provide - that the area eventually will be Police protection,one for road main- within the city,but that's a long way tenance in urban unincorporated OIL" areas and one for road maintenance The Bull Mountain-Walnut area in rural areas• study will assess the Immediate and Homeowners on Bull Mountain Iont-term urban service needs of the will have an opportunity to 1.!arn area.which includes the new deuel- more about the proposed county opments on Bull Mountain and an service districts at a meeting at 730 area west of Tigard between Walnut p.m.Aug.19 in the Portland General Street and Bull Mountain Road.The Electric Co.offices,14655 S.W.Old study will look at bow much it Scholls Ferry Road, Beaverton. would cost the city to provide road. County representatives will meet sewer and police protection to the with residents to explain the dis- areswhich is adjacent to the city on tricts and their costs. the Wen The meeting was arranged by Started in June,the study has a local citizen participation organiza- target completion date of next tions.Beverly Froude,leader of the fin,Brian sakL citizens' group on Bull Mountain, Asked if the city were interested said getting people to attend the {{nnnnexing the new subdivisions on forum was a priority of the group. - `msountain.Brian replied:"That's "rm glad that Tigant is doing the ; I.a delicate question. study," she said. "We:t at least.be. - "We have-no immediate plans, able to compare apples and apples; but because the issue is coming.we well be talking about facts rather felt it would be prudent to determine than opinions," when making deci- what our pa.i ion will be."he said. sions about annexation and city-pro. _ sCO) Hs ® $ s1 X Y 5a a E C;A ,a,® eS= Ft I oils Y w Igs 8 � Bal. --; Y cc �b � a t .� � C . flit s r + © a CL � < � � � } its -tog 4 g o al2k I (� 19,254 cis _ Co /may 3 (U Cts $ s CD E O •— � -i - U y n O• a yy��gga r ppp .d c may. KIM a A n n 8 w Y v E 4 a U ^ s® 93 wing j! o � ns u Val .8 - $ ,S�s 11A 1,1b I ®o =. ON �..0 .ma a 9 a . '' o - a� s a OWN �I; I��o : s �- ,. - � •0 r �� Jig: fig `. .O ' Ins . 8 ' - 4 - t i• T. {. Rlri�r Ili,mer ��A71�y Inc. Rubin I.uzicr U ,t.,Inc jlrtnillxinr ,n ' • v• ` Iiumiti,:4x `r, Sao 7 l (•..,1 yr r. i r .�,.ya"1 ',5 :'j Ika il f , is�.lut+truttiun ,, )lklym: a y III, (;[)n,tnN'tn)n p \unh t i}Yk a(1fNtx',' • •,`(Oril)a" (lung, IIN. .\IuhIIN: X - III IIINY,Illy;• IlrNil,K,!0: AWN'.,IIN'. 4,. '[v .x' � .rt r•ZT _•. .✓l trlsk. g •• 'a .o. . �3 �1�=+..�4a�`'`_.kr',�•;1,1 `,c` i �YF�• 3e G1.piv,�y.:a„frf •r4•~' s• 9�fr r� t�+,•l.;�a�:. ..J•• �f.� �-�• .r,.w �Ijy•p��[r Is�,�("'('�. '1 � 1 r+ I��AIG.�4T.,?- �',fJ.'.'- y . Y - •., 1 ,t t y r ^r k . 7 �~/['�r r�T I Vii" � :r n i� uC1-�. Y• 1 •.. � � �P:rj rr�a 1� �+",.rlr.' 1=F.fi.r+o�•��r•��ii. _ � �i rllil •• • y 9.• • AnPrda 5 �I li�c Illi}I Ililllt Its 111 /�1 ill 1(t Ilt Ill In1 • � � �- I -) � 1 f 4 �. � 1�,I 1 L.P, ➢I. l��l��+��lllill+{'IRl�ililltC��+11111i11I+lillih1'J11'illilllili�ili�lir'IIi�Ilii I1111111i1ifi1('4u •. NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED $ 9 _ . 10 .1� _.__.1. DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN I THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - OE 62 BE LZ 93Z SZ — * ZZ ZZ IZ OZ - - tUl�Nll�llil�llll�llll'11111Nii�HN�UIMIUl�} i I'��tU1 � MARCH All The Oregonian,Saturday,August 29, III Ir J' 1 TM OregoniWBRENT WOJAHN Bull Mountain Park,located on Southwest 141st Avenue off Buil Mountain Road,-offers large lots amid Douglas fir trees. Subdivisions takesBull N'lountain opened the area for the Street of Dreams square feet and multiple level homes need to By I.ARRY SHAW T=mile =n and other development,according to Mas- be at least 2000square feet,Masters said. of The Oregonian staff "No garish colors...I think the actual » Masters'latest subdivision is Bull Moun- language is earthtone stains;'Masters said. wo housing developments are under a F+ Tain Park No.3 and it will be his last Roofs am mandated to be wood or tile,and way on Bull Mountain near Tigard— <' arm roa,uin z Bull Mountain Park No.3 and Sono- V.rk Moa �'� TIGARO m Masters said his lots range from the no recreation vehicles,motor homes or mo- i ma Hills. a` = smallest at 13,630 square feet to the largest -torcycles may be parked on the street or in Bill Masters'Bull Mountain Park=: k 3° = at 18A70 Square feet. theAriveways unless in a garage.' j opment off Bull Mountain Road on South- Prices range from$37,000 to$46,000, '"1'helots are larger than most lots devel• west 141st Avenue is well on its way to com- sweva Mea"�" including all underground utilities. oped on Bull Mountain."Masters said. pletion. KONG CITY l raaoal� Only eight lots of the original 18 remain "And we are one of the few with trees. The 67-year-old Masters,a retired auvr- Masters said and he is reserving one,with Except for the very large firs,I planted ney and former United States administra- a view of the T11alatin Valley,far himself most of them;(the site)was originally a tive law judge,moved to the Bull Mountain we couldn't develop because we didn't have He is debating whether to build a new potato field.- arra,just west of U.S.99 West,22 years ago sewers,"Masters said. home. Masters said be was still mulling wheth. and purchased 2D-plus acres. An affirmative vote for a local Improve- Strict covenants cover the building sites. "Wewentforalongperiodoftimewhere went district brougbt the sewers and Single story homes must be at least1,800 See SUBDIVISION,Page D2. - SRI t �r t o r a a I , 3 x, The OreponiaNBREW WOJAHN Eight lots remain for sale in the Bull Mountain Park subdivision on All lots are tree lined.Single-level homes must be at least 1,800 Southwest 141st Avenue off Bull Mountain Road in the Tigard area. square feet and two-level homes must ue di least 2,000 square feet. ®evelopers offer treed lots, Ems 10untd-in view NSUBDIVISION,from Page D1, "The lots sizes will range from 7,000 to 12,000 ing and shake or tile roofs. er to build on one of the sites. square feet,"Mulkey said,"with an avenge of "It will be an upper-end subdivision;'Mulkey I"I haven't made up my mind,"he said, about8AW. Said."catering to the move-up pdcerange." "anyway,I can't do anything until I pay the IRS "We should be ready to go by the first of Sep- The subdivision is located 630 feet oft Bull pill the money." tember.'Mulkey said Mountain Road. I Farther west on Bull Mountain Road on South- "We are Selling to other builders and already 'We'il put a brick entry out front and probably west Chardonnay Avenue,the 55-lot Sonoma Hills have sold 15;'he added. ha eea white board rail fence bordering the entry subdivision by Orion Homes is under way. "All of the lots have a nice view of the Coast "We want to give it an estate-type effect",Mul- The lots will range from$36,900 to$39,900, Range and It sunset view:'Mulkey$aid- key said, according to Mike Mulkey of Orion and the Mulkey said covenants in the protect would Mulkev oroiected an eventual huildmlt in 1R +ititl►��i�iIII�1111tit�tifJ112tII�111�Ii1(1113111�I'P Y ' ' M[rYI IiIfiliStiTriT �ili�i�f��Pl►ilBlilill��t111111I�1t�i11��I�II) J1jIi1t1�1111111ItIt�tirliftifit y _ ,T NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED i`�---..-..-... .�. --- - -- - DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS WE TO - s TFE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. OE 6Z eZ LZ 92 SZ 4Z BZ ZZ IZ OZ 6P Bl LI 91 SI' bl Ell Zi 1I 01 6 9 L 9 S d £ 2 Icy t �nLfmthnlluulLutluul►Ntltntln�nniJlU. q)tulit�Wt�iltnt�tlnlg�Hi +iURf ►►�i� IIB MARCH 7 : 199 ) t, Ii s. > © < . wv \ . NOW W � . «�.. . .�. . y. $ . $ � : . ■ , , DRAFT REPORT �- WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STRATEGY November 17, 1987 Prepared By: ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. PO Box 976 _ Olympia, WA 98507 (206) 352-5090 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. WASHINGTON COUNTY'S INITIAL RESPONSE 2 3. FINDINGS 2 4. RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 A. Overview/Policies . 5 B. WRMP — Schedule and Work Plan 5 C. WRMP — Joint Operating Agreements 5 D. Water Supply Management 6 E. Water Quality Management 7 Fi F. Water Resource Management and Development 7 G. Watershed and Drainage Basin Management (Tualatin Basin) 8 H. Regional Funding Options 8 LIST OF EXHIBITS 1 Washington County WRMP Strategy/Organization 10 2 Washington County WRMP Program Elements 11 3 Washington County WRMP Operating Agencies/Support Agencies 12 4 Washington County WRMP Work Plan Outline 13 5 Washington County WRMP Preliminary Work Plan 14 f l 1 ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Management Consultants P.O.Box 978• 811 N.Columbia Olympia.Washington 98507 (208)352-5090 November 17, 1987 Ms. Bonnie Bayes, Chairman File No. Washington County Commissioners 150 N. 1st Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97123 Subject: Preliminary Draft - Washington County Water Resource Management Strategy Dear Ms. Hayes: d to it this Economic and Engineering oposedcWashington County WatereResourcemi`Sanagemente liminary draft oery P Strategy for your review and comment. It is our understanding that this preliminary draft will be presented to the Water Resources Future Needs Committee and to other study Washington County groups for review and input during the first week of December. Following receipt of the review comments, EES will dworknthe plan tonaddressnthehe proposed approach, and will develop a specific short- and long-term needs of the County. it should be emphasized that EES's basic approach seeks to minimize the creation of new governmental structures and programs. It recommends consol- idation of government programs through joint operating agreements and coor- dinated management of utility services. It may be necessary in the future to create a new regional authority for water resource ments managend byceat. However, we believe through use of joint operating gr ing areas of rshimosttOfutherobjectiveslidentified aws, the eby thedCountyed gram l existing and its Advisory accomplimpli E Committee. We are scheduled to meet with the Water Resources Future Needs Committee on the recommendations. We are prepared to meet with December 2 to discuss other groups, as appropriate, to seek their input and to further clarify and expand upon the steps necessary to implement this Strategy. Sincerely, R. L. Wubbena, P.E. President cc: Lloyd Barron, Chairman Water Needs Group Gary grahmer, Unified Sewerage Agency Dist. Gene Seibel, Wolf Creek Hwy. Water Enclosure l pp Utility Applications • Resource Management • Financial Analysis Product Forecasting Antitrust BellsrUe.Washington 0 Olympia.Washington • Washington.D.C. r DRAFT REPORT WASHDFMN COUNTY WATER RESOURCES MARAGEHM STRATEGY 1. INTRODUCTION Washington County continues to seek a balance between the demands for service and resources created by new growth and the desire to retain the quality of lifestyle that is characteristic of Washington County. In 1986, the Board of Commissioners appointed the Water Resources Future Needs (WRFN) Committee to initiate the first step towards defining the County's water resource management needs and to recommend a program to meet those needs. The 22-member WRFN Committee, representing 18 sepa- rate groups or jurisdictions, evaluated the water needs of the County. These included recreation (including fish and wildlife); water quality agriculture and irrigation; (including stream flow and flood control); a g and, municipal and industrial water supply. The WRFN Committee found that over 20 agencies and private organizations have some degree of regulatory or decision--making authority over water resources in the County. The WRFN Committee did not address the institutional or governmental relationships, but rather discussed the general objectives and unre- solved issues that should be addressed. The WRFN Committee's recom- mendations identified the need to define the method and options avail- able to manage both the growth and the water resources necessary for the quality of life desired by the County citizens. The summary of the WRFN Committee's May 198 report ishighlig is to following problems. Washington County's pop to increase over 40 percent in the next 15 years. The Tualatin River will not be able to meet the needs of the increased population. Presently, no one entity is responsible for planning for the needs, for coordi- nating the activities of over 20 involved agencies, or for ensuring that all key issues are included in the necessary water resource management program. The WRFN Committee's overall recommendation was that: "The Board of Commissioners of Washington County must assume the leadership role in addressing our current and future water resource needs and uses. Coor- dination and planning for our diverse long-term and short-term water needs and uses is critical to the future quality and quantity of our water and quality of life within the County." 1 1 3 i ► 2. WASHINGTON COUNTY'S INITIAL RESPONSE The Board of Commissioners accepted the WRFN Committee's report. They ' evaluated alternative approaches for responding to the specific findings of the Report. The Board also evaluated the broader issue of how to take advantage of the existing leadership and the progress already being made through the cooperative efforts of the cities, the water utilities, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA), and other districts and interest groups. Concurrent with the WRFN Committee efforts, the County, through USA and in cooperation with special study groups, has been evaluating and de- fining the water quality, water resource, and water supply needs. They have identified water quality problems. They have also identified poten- tial solutions through modified operations, facility expansion, and pos- sible new comprehensive water resource management strategies that in- volve participation by all local governments and utility systems. Concurrent with the County effort, the Wolf Creek Highway Water District, in cooperation with the other participating water utilities, has con- tinued to evaluate the long-term water supply needs for the County. They have concentrated primarily on the development supply through the use of the Washington County Supply Line from the City of Portland, and on developing joint supply and retail service area agreements with the Hillsboro, Beaverton, and Forest Grove Joint Water Commission. The County and Wolf Creek Highway Water District acknowledged the WRFN Committee recommendations. They have begun the integration of the inde- pendent activities into a common strategy. To assist them in this effort, they have contracted with Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. (EES) to expand the definition of need and to evaluate the options in meeting those needs. EES's specific assignment is to develop a summary of existing conditions, proposals, and options being considered by the County, cities, and special districts. They are to outline possible implementation strate- gies for both the short- and long-term needs of the County and then assist in developing an integrated Water Resource Managment Plan (WRMP) for the County. 3. FIMIPGS After reviewing many of the recent studies on water resources with the professionals and citizens currently responsible for managing a program in the County, the problems identified by EES are typical of urbanizing -2- f i counties. Namely, these problems include narrowly focused water supply, water quality, water flow, or sub-basin problem definitions that require an integrated program for effective long-term solutions and efficient resource management. The water resource management needs of most urbanizing areas are com- pounded by the shortage of natural resources, the competing and con- flicting objectives of the state and local governments, and the city versus special district management objectives. These conflicts and problems are further compounded by the lack of a common definition of need, resource constraints, and regional objectives. EES believes the WRFN Committee properly identified the need to develop a common definition of the Washington County needs and options. The Committee also recognized the importance of assigning the management task to an "organization or agency that has access to the resources and experience necessary to get the job done." EES's approach to this study has been to review existing studies, inter- view agency staff and citizen advisory groups, and to present both a brief narrative and graphic understanding of the issues and institu- e to defer the discussion of planning tional relationships. EES chos data and technical solutions to the Phase 2 Work Plan. A graphic definition of the various water resource groups in Washington le in the total program is shown on County and their respective ros Exhibit 1. The Exhibit, Washington County Water Resource Management Strategy/Organization, represents the first definition of each agency's generalized role and input into the proposed strategy. The missing element is the central organization or agency" that has access to the resources and experience to get the job done. To help identify or select a logical organization or agency to provide t the necessary leadership, EES evaluated the respective roles and responsibilities of the existing agencies involved in water resource management in the County. Exhibits 2 and 3 identify two different management options. Exhibit 2 outlines a possible program management orientation with three different programs recognized: utility delivery, resource protection, and re- E source management. Exhibit 3 recognizes the same three program needs but outlines the management structures on a functional basis. Both Exhibits recognize that the utility delivery systems, with defined ser- vice areas, become the critical element of an effective water resource management system. r f ff -3- A review of existing programs indicates that the special interest re- r- source protection and resource management organizations and support agency authorizations do not provide the existing framework necessary to serve as an effective organization for regional resource management. Only those agencies with direct utility and regional service responsi- bilities have access to existing authority and resources to implement the recommended program. Exhibit 3 reassigns the agencies into the operating and support roles they fulfill. This preliminary assignment supports the conclusion that a Joint Operating Agreement between the water supply agencies, USA, and the Tualatin Irrigation District (TID) could provide the necessary sup- port organization for Washington County to achieve its water resource management objectives. a EES also considered a single city, an existing support agency, or governmental reorganization as an alternative lead organization for water resource management. All were initially rejected due to the project's objective of implementing the recommended program early in 1988. 4. RECOMMEIMATIONS Based on existing studies and the initial findings, there is sufficient documentation of need and public support for the County to initiate development of a coordinated County-wide WRMP. The technical issues and water resource conflicts also support the urgency to identify the long- term water supply, water quality, and environmental protection require- ments if the County is to continue to provide for its future. The long-term projections are needed to help ensure that short-term solu- tions compliment, rather than conflict with, the long-term needs. Some of the tasks necessary to develop and implement the WRMP will re- quire detailed field studies and the development of a comprehensive water use model to properly manage the Tualatin River. Other tasks are designed to help establish areas of governmental and utility responsi- bility. This is so the appropriate agency will be held accountable for the leadership and financing of critical assignments. Some tasks only require letters of intent to support and document the joint efforts already begun. Exhibit 4 presents the first draft of the proposed Washington County WRMP Work Plan and the assignment of lead agency. The following specific recommendations expand on the Exhibit 4 outline and help put into focus the complexity of the tasks required to develop r the WRMP. -4- 1 A. Overview/Policies (1) The Washington County WRFN Committee should review the fol- lowing recommendations and assist the consultants and agency staff in developing an aggressive, but achievable, Work Plan for 1988. the County and interested (2) This Plan should be reviewed by appropriate organiza— tions to verify that the role of all appro P tions and agencies is recognized and properly assigned. (g) The WRFN Committee, in cooperation with the local governments ts and utilities, should assemble and review for consistency, existing Developement, Utility Service, and Resource Manage- ment Policies in the County. Conflicts or absence of approp- riate policies should be referred to the agencies for re- sponse. (4) The WRFN Committee should serve acoordinator Plan isand rconsifor input from other advisory groups when dered. B. {,SMP - Schedule and Work Plan ase I, (1) This Report should be revisedothendWRMP finalized aphase Ih report Implementation Strategy royal in January should be scheduled for final review and app 1988. (2) Phase II, Development of the WRMP - as outlined in the Draft Work Plan shown on Exhibit 5, should begin in February 1988. �. (3) Pl^ese III, WRMP Implementation - �pgsho should dates identifiedtas ed eluents of the Washington County a part of the Phase II Scope of Work. The Scope of Work should incorporate tasks relating to each of the recommenda- tions outlined in this report. Some WRMP tasks should be scheduled for implementation in 1988. C. WRMP - Joint operating Agreements (1) The County and Wolf Creek Highway Water District should expand their existing and joint funding agreement to fulfill the funding and management needs for the Phase II portion of the r WRMP. [ t -5- t (2) The major water supply agencies and the TID should develop a joint funding and project management agreement with USA and Wolf Creek to assist in implementing both Phase II and III of the 141M The agreement should establish the communication and decision protocol, and the target dates for project com- pletion. (3) The local support, state and federal agencies should partici- pate in the review of the Phase I implementation strategy. They should support the County's plan to develop and implement a comprehensive WRMP through letters of intent and financial support for specialized studies. D. Water Supply Management (1) The Washington Supply Line Group (WSLG), should initiate a Washington County Water Supply Needs and Development Plan (for 5, 10, 25, and 50 years), in cooperation with the Hillsboro, Beaverton, and Forest Grove Joint Water Commission (HBF/JWC) and other water suppliers. (2) The WSLG and HBF/JWC should enter into a joint operating agreement to undertake the supply needs and development study and to establish both a short and long-term service area and operating protocol between the WSLG and HBF/JWC for the Washington County supply area. (3) Wolf Creek, Metzger, West Slope, Raleigh, and Tigard Water Districts should, in cooperation with the area cities, develop a regional hydraulic model of the supply, storage, and distri- bution system. This model should be used to help define log- ical retail service areas, joint storage and supply line projects, and joint operating agreements for the Urban Growth Area. (4) The WSLG and HBF/JWC should review the long-term benefits of i establishing a Washington County Water Supply Authority for supply development and management. Retail water distribution would continue to be provided by either the cities or the water districts, similar to the USA program. (5) The WSLG and HBF/JWC should develop joint programs that will benefit both utility service and ensure quality service in Washington County. Programs that should be considered are: a) laboratory services and monitoring; b) utility billing and -6- I water use data management; c) regional supply system planning and hydraulic modeling; d) cross-connection control; and e) emergency and special construction services. (6) The water supply agencies (WSLG and HBF/JWC) should join efforts with USA and TID to integrate supply development, water quality protection (surface and groundwater) and water reuse planning and operation programs. E. Water Quality Management (1) USA's operation authority should be expanded by petition to include responsibility for storm utility operations, drainage and flood control, non-point pollution and groundwater manage- ment, and appropriate participation in solid waste and water supply planning to ensure that all necessary water quality control programs are developed and incorporated in the WRMP. (2) USA should immediately initiate development of a stormwater utility and a non-point pollution control plan. Both of these activities are an integral part of the early water resource management strategy. i (3) USA, in cooperation with the TID and the Soil and Water Conservation District, should outline options available for water reuse and alternative flow regimes that both impact and improve water quality in the Tualatin River. Both point and non-point sources of pollution should be considered. (4) USA should develop a Comprehensive Water Quality Control Plan for the Urban Area. The Plan should incorporate the waste- water collection and treatment store utility, non-point pollution, and groundwater protection plan. S SWCD, with assistance from the USA, should develop a rural ( ) area non-point pollution control and groundwater protection t plan. F. Water Resource Management and Development 1) USA should enter into a joint operating agreement with the ( TID, WSLG, and F.BF/JWC to project long-term water needs, water reuse, and flow augmentation strategies. { I t -7- (2) Based on the results of the Water Supply Needs and Development Plan and the Comprehensive Water Quality Control Management Plan (Recommendations D(1) and E(4)) and the projected water needs and flow augmentation strategies, an integrated resource management and development program should be scheduled. f I G. Watershed and Drainage Basin Management (Tualatin Basin) # 1 (1) The Tualatin River Basin serves as the watershed for several i public water supplies and groundwater lake recharge areas. It } also serves as the natural drainage basin for storm, agricul- ture, and domestic waste flows. Consequently, the management I } program should consider the technical support and operational management activities within the basin. Exhibit 4 outlines the role of the key agencies and the fol- lowing proposed study sequence. a (a) Identify Development, Utility Services, and Resource Management Policies - WRC. (b) Prepare Urban Area Water Supply Management Plan - Water Supply Agencies. (c) Prepare Urban Area Water Quality Management Plan - USA. i i (d) Prepare Rural Area Water Supply/Waste Disposal Plan for r individuals and small communities - County (USA). (Agriculture)(e) Prepare Rural A riculture) Water Quality Control and Irrigation Plan - TID/SWCD. E Based on the four plans and the associated findings and recom- mendations, the operational responsibilities for implementing an integrated plan should be assigned to a joint operating board composed of representatives from USA, WSLG, HBF/JWC, and the TID. Staff support should be provided by the respective agencies. Although the study efforts should be assigned to the lead agency, the staff support for the integrated effort should be assigned through a Joint Operating Agreement, to the USA. r H. Regional Funding Options i z The source of funding for the studies, capital improvements, opera- tion of the regional facilities, and staffing for water resource management programs includes the following options. More detailed fstudies will establish both costs and benefits. 1 I -8- F (1) Utility Service Fees - Water User Charges - Sewer User Charges - Storm User Charges - Irrigation Assessment (2) Ad Valorem Taxes e (3) Assessment District (a) Tualatin Watershed/Drainage Improvement District (b) Groundwater Aquifer Protection Districts (c) Subarea Benefit Districts (4) User Fees (Recreation/Fisheries/Utilities) User fees are generally based on direct benefits received. A Tualatin Improvement District could provide a comprehensive approach to funding the many studies and water resource management programs. The concept anticipates a County-wide assessment based on benefits received. The funded projects and operational programs would be outlined in the WRMP. This option will be discussed more in the final report. -9- ' i E)vc rsi ze Docurner Anpr�CL � (111{116�111t111�1111111 11111 lIIIIII III IIIIIp 7jF�T{i rpfml Il1r 11T 17� { 1 � � ( ! _P � f � I i_.� t l ! 1n>�t11111111��i��lll1j111t111�11�ta71I1111111+111111'�11�IIi1�111{111�111I111��11{FI1 . y �, NOTE: IF THIS MICRDFILMED I:-----_-.- :_..L. .__ _ _... 2 _- - _ 3 4 -- _ 5 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN t THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. '•r.-___ _--<---- _ _ --b-Z-6-1_ _ - OE 6Z BZ LZ 9Z SZ bZ EZ ZZ IZ QI LI 91 -Sr J. E1 21 11 01 B- 6I��"��"��" j �nlrNuhul�ulduu�uulxulruitm +nlu11 Alllllll111H MARC-Hry. w _ 7 91994 ... ...... ..... ..of 5 ON j too;-, oil!In............1 to lot At 1 ................ .............Gig M. nn OWN"also�jjj an,yy Von,I-M7 A IIVic TAX4 FOR".200"A test x-YQN NONA,A AM 1 Taco............goo I W_ R&O" N ------------ URM ANA a Now Lv low.. .....I All I foils! 4 C& Ung II ...........R Mum yjow�' IMr HTY "ADA BEQ/q_,A rag.""WIN IHem 7- 77- W&Rh 411AW Np-a MW ILil 11A low 1% 141cool;t RS a too -OR E M ago 0 5K -SITAWAS T's ON No WoU 1 = Now "S& qg a un;to... ..... iit 891 VMS,M son TH=NT ....................... jowl Z9 ITAMEN Ago :10 3011 Pon" via�Tw Mot 0 Rol mum Midi bz cr o CL 0 m O w i C —na� 3c 00 Z V) E a *. m d Loom . a N a z z w w C) d Z p Q +� O L -- cr- Z~Z Z Z 0 C 0 t/1 rn w W w O tal O c c .. Cit CEJ Z ONN w J U U n' va E ; O O m En in d -15 h-w5 Z :: =0mc H in w Zp Z � � OV)� O 00007 M�..ycr. mJ 6 om v � , N N CL v o- amaQ �I z L Q.�= W a 0 �: G D In F: a O F d �3 � o ca'i 3 z m 0 C3 cn O w c l lb } a o W Z O w p cz to 0 CD " Z U J V 3 u D V) v z 0 c� z N d 3 c o c a� c� c E m w-10 m � a Do v L c 00 o V) c c = 3E # � o� aao 0o m0Q' 33 � N = -11- C N� NVU N i W IAJ a_m Q W(nOv) v �= C O pa a- 3 a J N ' CL " F- m ° fl vv LLJ a d o Z C9 Q in cn F.- F- 0 z CA a. W U N r a aEn i r� t OR� Q� < i OA CL cc a us r • S C 3 O •t dao ,09a.a�a' CL z < vin � f gtl 3 < I y �A o ch CL Z—c.= 3 a �� $� € � c z UL�n �� v 5 a oin n N z « � 3 CLCL Wz 3r CL r i 1 a. bco C) 4000 cn a. q 114 U 3 ami 3 A w A o Q 3 y co 41 H U H M 5 Cn O 41 b b OCl a U o w O O 41 O A o ac tui PG C44 d 41 A .-1 V61 3 3 U 3 O a p a p • � aJ 7 u � C 04 o pp C r H M � U y� q 0 e G �q L+ 1✓ }a 4Qi x 0z°1 ca m dR ►u+ 4�1 D, w b d G O \ d 6 41 it d >+ M d 0 G >+ o C v O a 4) 1 4/ O 3 41 1 +c \ C Z C O L 41 o u '-7 L O u L d A .a O \ U-4 u Ln C 41 .--I 1n a co cn H w {J u O z > u Cy Ova H o a cu > b w I to M 41 3 I� .-1 X co m +4 41 4/ p u r1 \ O r-I aJ L O O O C C L b Cn d N A ca u 1.+ N 0 3 w w $4 O O u C \ O .-d x 14 41 w O 3 3 P+ +i -4 d c4 c0 a 41 41 w u .-1 C G +1 +I t O W d d C to C xC+ W 41 h0 0 41 q C C O o O O . r-4 41 O o O d d .dl w 3 Cn 6 H .-ti-CCO �7 ~7 P+ ai >> >> >+ 41 >, u a 41 4) a s ,J u U a a a a w w w 'D +1 41 O u r_ 4) 0 0 41 U b O O O O 41 -ri r1 r1 C .i C r-I 41 +l G -4 rl C 41 O O . I r-1 ♦-i .--I C L tJ L O L O +c 41 Tl r-4 +l u 4) -4 'r7 ri L 41 41 41 41 rl C C C _ H Cn iL v 4 > 0 1+ w > > wO c0 > > > > 4 41 41 y HH4W cz In O H u LQj C W El Om El 41 c a� y be cacc >10 b C V C Q. C r1 •O1 b co to -4 d 41 7 7 1a G 14 o C Ai aJ u „-I 41 Cn I +J Ql 4) O 41 a O C w C of '--I G \ 41 G +J O ++c 3 6 --t C 41 O p a co 41 r-1 x M 4J O H 4J H 7 .4 b 7 6 .-I O 3 O c0 a \ W `E a cn 41 w C Cr u e0 L+ R. E w .-1 0 O to d O u 41 7 b w 41 1 fa t+ ca 7 m O 14 sQ 41 41 G O C +i $4 *00 -4 A 3 3 � -14- �F 1 ��: r ✓r%� � '� tot f r PIS I II . FO N � � %%t SII i � ` � . � III, � ii��lut a„ I III.IIIII��fll�l I ,i1�IIlUII I��ilill!q;; - WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER RESOURCE PLAN :- WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT LEGEND f Urban Growth Area In Washington County Washington Supply Line Service Area Hillsboro. Beaverton. Forest Grove Joint Water Commission Service Area ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES.INC. November 16, 1267 • ' y ;:y•. _ECON_ O_MIC AND-ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. - - Management Consultants _ - P.O.Box 976• 611 N.Columbia _ - Olympia,Washington 98507 (206)352-5090 November 17, 1987 Ms. Bonnie Hayes, Chairman File No. Washington County Commissioners 150 N. 1st Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97123 Subject: Preliminary Draft - Washington County Water Resource Management Strategy Dear Ms. Hayes: Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. (EES) is pleased to submit this pre- liminary draft of the proposed Washington County Water Resource Management Strategy for your review and comment. It is our understanding that this preliminary draft will be presented to the Washington County Water Resources Future Needs Committee and to other study groups for review and input during the first week of December. Following receipt of the review comments, EES will expand upon the findings and the proposed approach, and will develop a specific work plan to address the short- and long-term needs of the County. It should be emphasized that EESrs basic approach seeks to minimize the creation of new governmental structures and programs. It recommends consol- idation of government programs through joint operating agreements and coor- dinated management of utility services. It may be necessary in the future to create a new regional authority for water resource management. However, we believe through use of joint operating agreements and by clarifying areas of responsibility under existing laws, the recommended program will accomplish most of the objectives identified by the County and its Advisory Committee. We are scheduled to meet with the Water Resources Future Needs Committee on December 2 to discuss the recommendations. We are prepared to meet-with other groups, as appropriate, to seek their input and to further clarify and expand upon the steps necessary to implement this Strategy. Sincerely, R. L. Wubbena, P.E. �N President cc: Lloyd Barron, Chairman Water Needs Group Gary Krahmer, Unified Sewerage Agency Gene Seibel, Wolf Creek Hwy. Water Dist. Enclosure Utility Applications • Resource Management - Financial Analysis Product Forecasting Antitrust Bellevue,Washington • Olympia,Washington • Washington,D.C. �r: t ——------------- — -7 7 T'i. J 2 ................................ 7-- 7 i H� 7 7� i i'T ji T T� ......... 7_1 2. 7 �-7� 'F� _Y� Tf Z RM .......... -1 -7'7� 7. bl 01 ji _7- D-i i Jm -7, Z� nr 5-' nt_ j J. ........ 7 '7 w zak 'i,'-i,i' f- 5� 7 2 f Y ........... J"� �iLi' A� F o 7, .......... v 2, ........... -J� '�Q j"t"_ 4, g� �cl-.Rxlz ZAWIW.�&S -Wh, UW U. STTITHEGQUALTT fir�.gft Q-6 j YK ZM' .......... 5P.i, c 'k- 5Z 4111 EXMIT 1 NASENGTON COUNTY HATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY/ORGAHMATION t4vmnbw 16,I N7 9 county Caunb"are CftY Ca.w3s Ututy SON" i:JC7 IMLM Transmon � er Water Reoaurca wa Urba Staaraeter/Dratrage _Water Quality pUaSapd worte waehbgton Ca./ � ,to Metro Lard Use Nadal Re.aaea Eam--TQM COUNTY WATER Itl FUTURE NEWS Ufte ften.meant Economy Regrdatore , Wet- iMiatrk Plm/ln+pi to ) DEO/Todatin pM=s EPA/ E Wa��tRwCOMetro.Wtr�a �.rms P7ve Oh Resources Human Raa rew Man"enat Croup. Env.Quality FReh t McMe Mk7lr Supply Management Naragema Coartl6raUa Caquahebtre WQ Caadi+atIon ��NY Maw) 1 I�s+U �4P1Y � tuta� J /Flm+ (i+waedaalsr Ldcm gavwRRa� CoAoofla V � Naf-pofit Yardtafiy Starm�atr Tnatmat Do;— Crmmw tab or S-94-" water D"t. CRte. -Irr.Obi HWAbom USA HWAbmo THPRD USA CounbfAm USA Camttyy/USA USA Portland water Paad Metmr ar Rearta Other, krlptla oDW*Ut SwCD klgnUa�rONbkor kr t State ParlCuria at SwrP Dy}�t CIUe. FtrUad Clatlrana. Sherwood Tigard koro &sow R�enatkxr FM t MWdtlfe FBe.teQ �" DEQ Lake Onego lltrrar. WwK Slope wwat Crook FOnaw Ouw Drokmp OtrMlet Hlbboro Rakdgh OMs. _ Hydropwar a,a9�na FTaad Catrai Oeeeya Core. H UR b o Canty SwCO SA COE I it -10- it lj► 1111111101 l l l l l l l l r ( l l l I t 11T 1111IiT II1tT 1 111 I j.. r l ! ! I i I [I 1 1 1 ! I j l ! III ! 1 1 1 1 I. 11 ! . _ i, -� ' ` I ! ! ,•I•� m�t� (- ( I �I I 1_ I I. I �I tit Ilf )) I I 1 1 t I 1 1 J t I t t 1 I I I t til RIR 111 RI1 111 rlr 1 t til: '� NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - -._._ -! . 2 3 4 -- _ 5j 6_ - 7 8 9 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL _- DRAWING. --- ----— _ Z 82 SZ bZ EZ ZZ IZ QZ 6t 81 LI 91 Si b1 EI ZI 11 OR —6 9 46C1Z ( »�.•m..l"glNla! ----I-��, a — .Slih••t,me` tmd I IiUlllll�1111 �m nulun ludas Dultal __ _. —_-_—_. M CIS 19 �® !Lal¢; - p 4 1 e i { WATER RESOURCES FUTURE NEEDS COMMITTEE James Allred, County Commissioner Appointee Lloyd Baron, Chairman, Interested Citizen Don Burdick, Lake Oswego Corporation Larry Cole, Cities Representative - Lyell Gardner, WCSWCD t 'Roger Gano, Cities of Yamhill County Oscar Hagg, Interested Citizen Grant Johnson, Wash. Co. Chambers of Commerce Shirley Kengla, DEQ Gary Krahmer , USA Les Lingscheit, Oregon Parks Association Jesse Lowman, County Commissioner Appointee Laurie Martin, Wash. Co. Visitors Assoc. Mike Mc Killip, County Commissioner Appointee John Meek, Washington County Commissioner Dan Porter, Yamhill County Commissioner Ken Rutherford, Fish and Wildlife Arden Sheets, OSU Extension Office Gene Seibel, County Commissioner Appointee (water districts) /L.')OLF c-f2EFDC. Howard Terpenning , THPRD Palmer Torvend, TVID Charles Varnum, County Commissioner Appointee (Cherry Grove) (n t l` Tr •M- - •'t' (A !tt 4� . �► III , ►, .� 10 ��C� f� OF . I./I �� ►1!,�iir� �'r// �I//,� i� t�� I II III(IhI t�tl ILII II `ISi11�IlI R_,.�, �� /;�\f/ .�� •� Ih � �I�Ali►�I��i,Ii�l,a�►I,►,�,;,t:,t..►�►�,, , . HisIll.SII I� 7!� moi..► r�., �; ;;,•:,;, i S I .•!, rr �. iII ,. V,::�f�lul• I � �� I IIIh,;il .._.:: ► : , �i., � ►11111 III. � .. . NEW � CiG�►L -,.: �nlly�l;lli '.ill}ll�il�l�l��;lnlll; - Ild RESOURCE VLhl; UrbanVAS WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENr "EAS Growth Area in Washington County C 1111111 � �1� ►� I�. .`.} i�' >• 11111 I 1� •.: ',z PIP I I I V�'•;!!! . ..5_��VIA Rr .. /.,!j��' ,,` :IIi�� r {►,I��il��,�IIIII,,;;; ,;.�.�..„1.:�; ' �Ir ,..►i�.,,.r..�..Jf�11 i II ��Illllllllll�llll�u,�. �III��I��I I I � ;�:. �' � .•�,/ ��1i.11� III � ,..:.�j !. �AW t...�.11 l•I � .1� ' .__ ��{ II h?lutt ml Itt� I�111111 WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER RESOURCE PLAN "2 WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS .j: LEGEND Urban IIIIIWashington Supply Line Service Area Hillsboro. Beaverton. Forest Grove Joint Water Commission Service Area ECONOMICNovember 18, 198ry yy r-i