Loading...
City Council Packet - 10/26/1987 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL. PUBLIC NOTICE:: Anyone wishing Lo speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA (CATV) sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, *" OCTOBER 26, 1987, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start E TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 6:30 o STUDY SESSION - Review agenda topics 7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items I 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request • that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council minutes: 10/1/87; 10/7/87 3.2 REPORTS: Receive and File a. Departmental Monthly Reports - September, 1987 Community and Administrative Services Community Development Library Police 3.3 Board and Committee Appointments: a. NPO Appointments - Resolution No. 87-� Commission, Park guard, b. Budget Committee, Planning Transportation and Utilities and Franchise Board/Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 87--(-1-0 3.4 Approve Call Public Hearing (12-7-87) for Utility Easement Vac. Lots 4 and 5 of Amart Summerlake - Res. N87-LL 3.5 Approve Call Public Hearing (12-7-87) for Utility Easement Vac. - Lots 131 and 132 of Kneeland Estates 02 Subd. - Res. No. 87-432- 3.6 7- „jam3.6 Authorize hiring of a Word Processing Operator and centralized dictation system - Resolution No. 87- -) ;-" 3.7 Approve condemnation proceedings - SW 130th Avenue 3.8 Receive and file underground of utility lines memorandum (unl0ss pulled for discussion and direction from Council) 4, ACTION AREA OVERLAY CPA 87-03, 7.OA 87-09 AND ZC 87-16 o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council: ORDINANCE NO. 87-_,55 ORDINANCE NO. 87-,-,,j,, ORDINANCE NO. 87-_,:!�Z COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 26, 1987 - PAGE 1 5. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL. PROPERTY F"OR SW 68TH PARKWAY LIC) NO. 35 o City Engineer 6. PUBLIC HEARING — STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION — SW 69TH AVENUE AND ADJOINING UTILITY EASEMENTS o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public- Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council: ORDINANCE NO. 87--5s- 7. ACCEPT FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SET PUBLIC HEARING (11/23/87) FOR SPREADING ASSESSMENTS — LID #35 PHASE V — RESOLUTION NO. 87-2j_:j o City Engineer 8. FORFEITURE OF SEIZED PROCEEDS — ORDINANCE NO. 87— t • o City Attorney 9. NON—AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into ExecutivO ve Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 11. ADJOURNMENT cw/1A08D T COUNCIL AGENDA — OCTOBER 26, 1987 — PAGE 2 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 26, 1987 - 6:39 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer (arrived at 6:50 p.m. ) . 2. STUDY SESSION a. Review of Agenda Items: 0 Council and Staff discussed the following agenda items: —Councilor Johnson had questions on Agenda Item 3.6 concerning the centralized dictation equipment. Council. consensus was to table this item until the November 2, 1987 meeting so further information could be provided by staff. —Councilor Johnson questioned the Community Services Department monthly report wherein it was reported that foreclosure proceedings were being initiated on delinquent Bancrofted Assessment Accounts . The report stated "the first foreclosures will be on property owned by Mary Burnham and Lionel Domreis which account for about $150.000 irr unpaid princinal and interest." This statement should have read " . . .$150,000 in unpaid principal and interest." Mayor, Brian summarized the history behind this case. i —Council discussed Item 3 .7 - Request for City to assist with accessing public right-of-way (condemnation proceedings) -- Don Mori sette Builders. Community Development Director rioted this request was for public right--of--way only. t There was discussion on condemnation procedures. Councilor Johnson referred to the fact that there was a public hearing scheduled on November 2, 1987 for a Comprehensive Plan t Amendment (CPA)/Zone Change (ZC) in this area. She submitted that it would be more appropriate for Council to postpone the condemnation proceedings. Council consensus was to table this item to November 2, 1987 after the public hearing item. (Note: Subsequent action during the Business Meeting Agenda included action on this item; see Item No. 6 below. ) —Community Development Director and Senior Planner Newton discussed with Council Agenda item No. 4 - on the Action Area s Overlay. It was noted that the ordinances prepared for consideration at this meeting did not include any reference to the Tigard Triangle. Senior Planner Newton advised the Tigard Triangle Area would be addressed in a separate hearing fi process. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 26, 1987 Senior Planner Newton distributed to Council the City of Beaverton' s definition for a drive—u:,) window and the text on drive—up windows from Beaverton's Zoning Ordinance. A public hearing for adoption of standards for drive—up windows is scheduled for December• 7, 1987. The Planning Commission will review prior to this date. --City Engineer discussed with Council Agenda Item No. 5. which dealt with disposal of surplus real property for S.W. 68th Parkway LID No. 35. City Council received in their packet a memorandum from the City Engineer which outlined the history of this L.ID. This memorandum also listed the owners of the parcels involved. City Engineer rioted that Parcel No. 2 should show art additional owner: Frank M. Warren, Sr. ---City Engineer discussed with Council Agenda Item No. 7 which was the Final Engineer's Report on LID No. 35 and setting a hearing (November 23, 1987) on any objections to the final at;ties sment roll . City Engineer referred to the Final Engineer's Repur't (submitted to Council in their packets for the meeting) which explained the reasons for cost overruns. ---City Attorney discussed with Council Agenda Item No. 8 which was consideration of an Ordinance on Forfeiture of _seised Proceedr, -" The City Attorney rioted ACLU has challengod similar laws in Clackamas County; the laws have been upheld twice in court. Multnomah County also has a similar law but, to his knowledge, it has not been challenged in court During discussion later in the Study Session, City Attorney noted he had been contacted by Washington County Counsel on this ordinance. Washington County Counsel would like to review the content- of the ordinance. After discussion, Council consensus was to table the ordinance to November 2, 1987, to allow Washington County Counsel time to review and asked City Attorney to make this contact. --Councilor Eadon reported that on October 6, 1987, the Planning Commission considered an amendment to Preliminary Plat Approval for the Butler Terrace Subdivision. The request was to modify a condition of approval requiring a sidewalk between the end of S.W. Inez and S.W. 97th Avenue. Staff recommended the pathway/sidewalk be retained. Planning Commission consensus, after public testimony, was that the property owners were more familiar with the problems and the need for the pathway. The Planning Commission approved a motion to delete the requirement for a bike path, a portion of the sidewalk, and installing the crossover into the school parking lot as the applicant requested. Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 26, 1987 Councilor Eadon rioted that on February 2.3, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 87-08 vacating a portion of S.W. Inez Street. A condition of the vacation (as noted in the ordinance) was: That a permanent pedestrian/bikeway easement be retained over a portion of the vacated area. . The terms and conditions of sai'' easement being those standard terms and conditions adopted by the City for .ase with pedestrian/bikeway easements . . . There was discussion by Council with Community Development Director concerning the information considered by Planning Commission. City Council has until November 3, 1987 to call this item up for review; Community Development Director- advised he would have Senior Planner Liden (staff member present at the 10/6/87 Planning Commission meeting) pr•eparo M memorandum to City Council outlining in more detail thc� discussion and subsequent decision reached by Lhe Planning Commission. This memorandum would be mailed to tho City Council prior- to their11/2/87 meeting. am —Councilor Johnson and Councilor Edwards noted that Ilub Gray recently made inquiries concerning his b,rllfield projects near Cook Park. Mr. Gray had been expros.sirvi concorn.1 over expediting the permit procedures in City 1611 . There was discussion on the item; Mayor ropor•Led iL was his ; understanding that certain requirements havo yet to be fulfilled by Mr. Gray for the Corps of Engineers . Once the*se satisfied, the City is prepared to iasue conditions have been permits. i 4 —Councilor- Eadon noted a problem at the intersection of Summerfield and Durham Road. A new stop light has been i installed but will not be working for a few mora weeks . Councilor Eadon had observed some apparent confusion about stopping at the intersection and wa,s concerned about safety . City Engineer advised he would have staff look into the situation. The Business Meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Brian. 3, CALL TO COUNCIL AND STAFF FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. Councilor Johnson advised she would like to report to Council on the October 23 Washington County Elected Official Caucus. 4, VISITOR'S AGENDA -- No one spoke. E Page 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 26, 1987 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1 Approve Council minutes: 10/1/87; 10/7/87 5.2 REPORTS: Receive and File a. Departmental Monthly Reports - September, 1987 Community and Administrative Services Community Development Library Police 5.3 Board and Committee Appointments: a. NPO Appointments - Resolution No. 87-129 b. Budget Committee, Planning Commission, Park Board, Transportation and Utilities and Franchise Board/Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 8i--130 5.4 Approve Call Public Hearing (12-7-87) for Utility Easement Vacation •- Lots 4 and 5 of Amart Summerlake, - Res . #137-131 5.5 Approve Call Public Hearing (12-7--87) for Utility Easement Vacation . - Lots 131 and 132 of Kneeland [states #2 Subd. - Res. No. 87--132 5.6 Authorize hiring of a Word Processing Operator and centralized dictation system -- Resolution No. 87- (Tabled -- 11/2/87) 5.7 Approvo condemnation proceedings -- S.W. 130th Avenue 5.8 Rorceivu and file undo*r•ground of utility lines memorandum (unless pulir.d for- discussion and direction from Council) Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Juhnson to approve the consent agenda amended as follows: fTable Items 5.6 and 5.7 to November 2, 1987 as discussed clueing the Study Session. Motion passed by a unanimous vote of Council present. 6. CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS - S.W. 130TH AVENUE a. Andy Jordan, Don Mor•isette Builders, asked to speak Lo t-he Council . Mr. Jordan was concerned over- the tabling of item 3 .7 - 4 Approve Condemnation Proceedings - S.W. 130th Avenue. a Mr. Jordan noted the developer' s desire to begin preparation of the plat for a development in this area. Mayor Brian advised that during the Study Session, Council consensus was that it would be ` more appropriate to consider this item once the Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change hearing had been held on property in this area. Mr. Ryan O'Brien, Citizens Savings and Loan, came forward ° and advised Council that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA)/Zone Change (ZC) request had been withdrawn earlier that day. Community Development Director and Legal Counsel advised that Mr. O'Brien's testimony could be accepted as part of the record that the subject CPA/ZC request had been withdrawn. Council discussed the Transportation Plan with regard to the request on condemnation proceedings. Community Development Director advised that the developer's plan complies with the present Transportation Plan for Tigard. Page .a - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 26, 1987 i Mayor Brian said he would be comfortable with approving the condemnation proceedings because the development process would require that the plat be submitted and the City Engineer could check the traffic flow pattern to assure that it is consistent the the Comprehensive Plan. Councilor Eadon asked that any motion for approval of condemnation proceedings be conditioned upon an agreement with the developer that any legal problems/costs which may develop as a result of the condemnation proceedings be the responsibility of the developer. Presently the land has an unknown owner status and is in the process of County tax foreclosure; therefore, Councilor Eadon wanted assurances the City would be protected in the event an owner does come forward with any claims during the redemption period. Legal Counsel advised that Council could condition their decision on receipt of a written agreement addressing the concerns outlined by Councilor Eadon. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor• Edwards, that the City would agree to initiate condemnation proceedings subject to a satisfactory written agreement pertaining to costs or any other exposures resulting from such condemnation. Motion passed by a unanimous vote of Council presont. 7. PUBLIC HEARING — ACTION AREA OVERLAY CPA 87-03, ZOA 87-09 and ZC 87-16 a. Public Hearing Opened . b. There were no declar•at-ions or challenges . C. Senior Planner• Newton synopsized the issue. On September 21, 1987, the City Council reviewed the proposed Action Arras concept. After considering input from the Planning Commission and NPO #1, Council directed staff to revise the standards for administering the ordinance. The revised standards were reviewed by NPO 1l1 and the Planning Commission and their suggestions were presented to City Council at a public hearing on October 12, 1987. At that meeting, Council directed staff to revise the standards proposed in Chapter 1.8.86. Submitted to the Council in their meeting packets were three ordinances which, if approved, would adopt Chapter 18.86 with Council' s suggested revisions, amend the Comprehensive Plan and designate the Central Business District (CBD) as an Action area. Senior Planner Newton noted the reference to drive—up windows in the action before Council; she advised that existing drive—up windows would be allowed to remain (grandfathered) . d. Public Testimony — No one spoke. e. Public Hearing Closed. f. Recommendation by Community Development Staff: Page 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 26, 1987 Senior Planner Newton recommended adoption of the referenced ordinances. g. Consideration by Council: ORDINANCE NO. 87-55 AN ORDINANCE: TO AMEND THE FINDINGS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (VOLUME 2) OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - ACTION AREAS (CPA 87-03) Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to adopt Ordinance No. 87-55. Motion adopted by a unanimous vote of Council present. ORDINANCE NO. 87-56 AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER 18.86 TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE - ACTION AREAS (ZOA 87-04) Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor• Edwards, to adopt Ordinance No. 87--56. Motion adopted by a unanimous vote of Council present. ORDINANCE- NO. 87-57 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZC 87--06) PROPOSED BY THE CITY. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt Ordinance No. 87--57. Motion adopted by a unanimous vote of Council present. 8. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY FOR SW 68TH PARKWAY LID NO. 35 a. City Engineer• advised Council that the City acquired certain parcels of property in connection with the project known as S.W. 68th Parkway LID No. 35 and the plat of Way Lee. When property was acquired for the LID, it was understood that surplus property would be conveyed to the owners of adjoining properties. City Engineer noted that in his memorandum to Council dated October 16, 1987 (submitted in the Council packet), Frank M. Warren, Sr. should be added as a property owner to Parcel No. 2. b. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Edwards, authorizing Mayor and City Recorder to dispose of Parcels 1 through 3, Tract A, and Tract B, and add Frank M. Warren, Sr. as property owner - Parcel 2. Motion passed by a unanimous vote of Council present-. 9. PUBLIC HEARING - STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION - SW 69TH AVENUE AND ADJOINING UTILITY EASEMENTS a. Public Hearing Opened b. There were no declarations or challenges. Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 26, 1987 ro erty owner's in 1985, P ' P won dedicated right-of-way for• the new Engineer summarized this item• n c, City g Street LID would relinquish any the 68th ParkwUY that the City completion Of with the expectation of property upon the street, remainder's Council initiated resulting unneeded 14, 1987, On September of S.W. 69th Avenue and construction. �� remnant portion to vacate assist with the completion process easements which will asci. between S W adjoining utility S'W' 68th Parkway the need to The improvement °f '{i.ghway has removed of the LID• S W Pacific public purposes. Atlanta Street and easements for P retain this right-of-way and utility d public Testimony - No one spoke• e, Public HearCLosed• ing uest. ' t Engineer, recommended approval of the vacation req f. Ci y Council.g. Consideration by CouncRecorder advised a Development Director and Deputy Community es made by • �d Ordinance was hand carried reflt.ctl d ed Council Shutes revi��- their' Study Session. This Or Legal Counsel r•c�fcar•c�ncing applicable Or•eyon Rcav�.sk. numbers and r•efvr•matti,ng of text. OF A PORTION ORDINANCE NO. 87-58 AN ORDINANCE EPUBjjCR RIGHT-OF CATIING VAON AND f1UJINNTNE O A DE'.DI A RECORDS D PLAT OF SW 69TH AVENUE, PUBLIC UTILITY WAS�iIN TON COUNTY,TS AOREGON. CITY OF TIGARD, Edwards, to Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Motion by g7_58 adopt Ordinance No . resent. Motion approved by a unanimous vote of Council P FOR ENGINEER'S REST AND SET PUBLIC HEARING (11/23/87) 10. ACCEPT - - LID 035 PHASE SPREADING ASSESSMENTS 68th parkway Local The S.W. a City Engineer summarized this item. leted in vemer►t District No. 35 was formed in 1983 for construction o - Improimprovements, Construction was comp al details regarding the right-of-way for street and utilities The final engineer' s report 1986, A number* of leg report be resolved their packet. The the project needed the Council in was submitted ver explained the final costs and the reasons for Cncil°hadr agreed that 1983 and 1984, the City Counc The share of the cost of this LID project. In discussions in the City would pay a City share is 15% of construction costs. estimated this LID were preassessed in 1984 based aitional Properties in final engineer's report shows that the final credit due for• each property now costs. The assessment or alculated on actual costs' assessments have been c C Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 26, 1987 lr In order to close out the LID, it would be necessary for Council) to set a hearing date (suggested date was November 23, 1987) to hear any objections to the final assessment roll . b. RESOLUTION NO. 87-133 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ]IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SW 68TVI PARKWAY (STREET) IMPROEN TICE BERGIVEN AND DIRECTING ARPUBLIDL NT C HEARING TO ROLL, DIRECTING BE HELD. Motion by Councilor, Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve Resolution No. 87-133. Motion adopted by a unanimous vote of Council present. 11. FORFEITURE OF SEIZED PROCEEDS a. Consensus of Council reached during the Study ',ession was to )able this item and set for review on November 2, 1981. 12• NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Washington County Elected Official Ci.+ucus Councilor Johnson r•epor•ted on the October 2.2, County Elected Officials Caucus. Shd noted ttiat Chair )lays made a presentation concerning the Oregon on the process begun in Washington County Tourism Al_l lance (part of Governor' s s C.c:onomic. Development this Program) . The County desires to get is process going as quickly as possible. ith an ad hoc committed Chair Hays had met w comprised of business people at large througyu throughout Washington County. Chair Hays and Charlie Cameron (County Administrator-)oo� 1et Witt' Larry Cole and Fldon Mills to discuss a P ' olve Washington County cities in the County Economic Development Plan. Task Force concept and are looking to cities They decided upon a to appoint or elect two representatives: onp from the east side and one from the west side of the County. Councilor Johnson reported that she offered City of Tigard facilities aril to host a meeting among the six east-nide Me could be for the purpose Washington County cities. This of a round-table discussion of the Economic Development Plan and selection of a Task Force representative. Council reviewed their calendar and determined that November 3, A or 5 would be possible dates for the six-cities' meeting. Staff will work on contacting the other cities and coordinating the date. Consensus of Council was that someone from Washington County would be askedlan and the purpose be present at hof the tTa�ktForcelain the Economic Development Page 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 26, 1987 13 . ADJOURNMENT — 8: 18 p.m. Approved by the Tigard City Council on December 7, 1987. 0 CLtAly-'n—e W Deputy Recorder- City of T' and ATTEST: Mayor — City of Tigard cw/1549D Page 9 — COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 25, 1987 i i i TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ° \ Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED C• o o�. J • ❑ Tearsheet Notice OCT 26 1987 • O. O� �1 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit JF T;'Cr-IEiD G, o� 91z`3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' being first duly sworn, depose and say-that I aqn the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the— O,k, ,J *--Q' a newspaper of general circulation a$ de ed in ORS 193.010 and 193.020. published at T` o v J in the of said count and state, tha t — b\ ---- – a printed copy of which is ereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said news er for_—_i_ successive and consecutive in the following issues: Subscribe nd swo o before mo this be–'C_ Zz �q8 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Explrgs:q AFFIDAVIT itid fotlowiag tSrrts srtt peaDiuhe`d for your In rmatlon Furher WOrms"M Aud filti a maY fie obtafaed from the Gty Recor- der,13125,SW)tri Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon$7223,or by Calling 639.4171. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING—OCTOBER 26,1997 &W P.M.Study Session-7:30 P.f11 Rc%nlar Meeting„ 'nGAAD CIVIC CENTER,OWN HAIL 13US SW.HALL BOULEVARD.TIGARD.OREGON r Public Hearls . =Cetus!Busiama Dtfttd Overlay CPA 87.03/ZOA 87-041ZC-16 ►.GM 1►ver n+e Sheet Iftcation; frgttiAveasweP$r-kway L cal tmpmvement DLgdct No.35 3EpoW 4tSutp4ua ReaYPmpirty '. F r^. gesr s Report and went Public Bearing Set •Di am9l -Pol;lir i r prtYvecr nts as Conditians of ns�1+d�+rrNent •f2tdfn§ gallon for.€"felturea sof Sebed PAP fits 1 r+rfsffc .rt s 3 ' r`� f' fic ,.4*M int am 3 - 1rr� txus 1 t3 ttlll. TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal -7 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising 0 ❑ Tearsheet Notice ,73�>a • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit g"1Zz3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUN OF WASHINGTON, )ss. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theSS.'�?��"AtE�� a newspaper of general circu on as ,defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published in the afer i ounty and state* that the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ---successive and consecutive in the following issues: f <1 --r_ Subscribed a to before me this_— c� VS �9$ 7 0NotaryPublic for Oregon My Commission Expirez:q•2-e,88 AFFIDAVIT the following will be currzl 'ay tbt-Ti&d City Council on October 26 1887,at 7:30 P.M.at the Tigard Civic Ccnterjown Hall,Room,13125 SW _Had!Boulevard,Tigard,.Oreva.,Further,infarmatlon may be obtained from ,tM Community Development Director of City.Recorder at the same loci- -4=or by calling 638.4171.You are invited to submlt wr£tten testimony in admce of the public hearing;written or oral testirmmy.wrIll be cohmderxd aai-tttt5 hearing.The public hearing i+will be conducted in accordance with cheoter IS=-and�111;32.of the Tigard Municlol Code"and any rules of procedure adopted by the Cnunctt and avaMble st City Halt,-, 9 WREA13NSIVE PLAN AMF.I MENT CPP;,8?-03.`'ZONE fJfiDI= NAMAMEND+lENTZOA 87-04,ZONE GHAHGi?7.0 87�i$-.hS U lfi Vii`=-vle*l y`t-hei City Council of an amefidment to the Fiddia jo Policies,_ 8®d Ye'tpleir!eatgtlon $taafi*gies docutner�fa addi llctltls liiea giraL4 and Fe as and Isdditional Brea Of�peciat.caticA:,2�e>a Lhe;Atrion $,� Areae QVErlay to_the CEm'.dt "Ct;Tr�' el fb ?Igatd f+diurlctpat Cede to. add a ctMepter tegulating developmeAt la hFeat; fg esierr chap ter YS 1*S CIIF3�t►aftl� t ;f� J TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6548 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED • City of Tigard E3Tearsheet Notice OCT 2 B W�- r • PO Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit ,,,F T,,;;yPj Tigard , OR 97223 • • E 3 t AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION t STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' r 1, Anne Jean being first duly sworn, depose and say tint I am jhg1,Ad e r ising Director, or his principal clerk, of the—_ g s a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at_— T ig a r d in the aforesaid county and state; that the --st_rr-et ( V n r n t,i nn -- i a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for._5—__ successive and f consecutive in the following issues: I -- Sept . 24 , Oct . 1 , 8 15 , 22 , 19, 7 i. Subscribe nd'sworn before me this ]-257 I I ry Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 9-20-88 AFFIDAVIT. OREGON NOTICE OF PUAIIC_ E _JNG . S W 6 I>;AY rl�tUE STREET%FAVATItIN AND .( s-iI III I EASzMENTS WITHIN WAY LEE,A RECORDED PLAT. r3TY QF TIGARD wA,SHINGTdN CO'�3Nt Y.0)2PGON o Tt and+City Couaca vAlfhold a.public tiesriaig on Monday,October 241w,,;at 7:3*04f.,14-1 igard Civic Center roman Hili Roam.1312 r SW. I'&U iloLgevard, Tige'rd, OreVn; to consider the proposed'Oub%i _street richt ay vacation fora portion of S.W.69th Avenue anis rdjoICft pnbUC dSerilCllts wW to way Yate.a.recorded plat,in the City of Tigard, Costnt~9,Orevm-The W of these vacations fs to rete ;f�j`' t .oW.nerxhip unheeded-red cinders of p�eerty irk the tR4t7! .ocai lCMTOvenvent Dh'fct The resp ?Ras Initiated CosakElt,xi 5 'fs 1f `taut]* . r".'ma9 ¢¢ btsA±'d f6r.at'�r�iS f �yy.. "e8tlJtyfat8�{tly��3mlflk, ;" (i%fislae't Z�Ate!-fair=� �'.11f � t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I \�^{V)C �, �i�V\ ( �L being first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That I posted in the following public an conspicuous places, a copy of r c� 1t— A— Ordinance Number(s) �-i.'� which were adopted at ther Council Meeting dated /0- :?l. - -7- copy(s) of said ordinan�e(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the /'day of d"— r' 1987. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon -$ubscr•ihed and sworn to before me this day of �Cfv�2, 19F2 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: P CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE N0. 87—,Z5 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FINDINGS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (VOLUME 2) OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — ACTION AREAS (CPA 87-03) WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Comprehensive Plan periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning staff held a public hearings befo,i^e the City of Tigard Planning Commission on September 8 and October 6, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation of CPA 87-03 at the same meetingi; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held public hearings on the proposed changes on September 21 and October 12, 1987. THE -CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Findings. Policies, and Implemantation Strategies shall be amended as shown in Exhibit "A" as Policies 11.6.1-11.6.7. Section 2: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that this amendment be made with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the Recorder. PASSED: By U ma ni m oa s vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this QlrLO day of 1987. City Recordel%J — A ne kher' Whoa0e� ''�/ �pt,pufi� APPROVED: This .0�(::!I day of 1987. � A � Thomas M. BCCrri�—a"n�n, Mayor Approved as to form: c Ci Attorney) Ln M Date sb/0387D E EXHIBIT 11.6 ACTION AREAS on the land use map where transit service and Action Areas are designated Commercial, Light pedestrian traffic are encouraged in conjunction with Industrial and Medium, Medium-High and High Density Residential Uses. GOALS V sup�5orting nature of intense land uses and high o Reinforce the mutuall accessibility of major transit stations. the use of public transit and facilitate that use through land o Encourage use and design control-.. o Encourage and facilitatepedestrian traffic through land use, circulation patterns and design controls. POLICIES Medium-High, and High the following Density Residential where e as concentrations of General Commercial, Light 11.6.1 Designate as Action Ar Industrial, Medium,ctria are met. a, The area is generally within one-quarter mile of a major transit center or trunk route. b. Areas with existing uses which are frequented by pedestrians, or vacant land which could support uses which would be patronized by pedestrians and/or transit riders. eas which are currently automobile orient c. Ared may be included in r redesign of pedestrian ways to anticipation of a change of use o better integrate the use into the action area. 11.6.2 Determine permitted uses through zoning. Further regulation of uses in Action Areas shall be accomplished with an overlay zone which limits specific automeof uses orientewhiche are Permitted trian and epublic encourages a higher level transit oriented. 11.6.3 Require that all development permitted in action areas be designed to facilitate pedestrian movement within the center and to transit. 11.6.4 Review and update city Parking ordinances to recognize parking needs in Action Areas. 11.6.5 Develop a design plan for each Action Area to pting rovide guidance land uses'. financing public improvements and pedestrian and bicycle circulation, Plans for automobile, transSeWQ age, and lighting will be included. open space, storm drainage, the The City will have the primary responsibility for developing design plan but will coordinate with Oregon Department of Transportation, and Tri-{'het. 11.6.6 Development in the Action Areas may be subject to special circulation and design considerations during design review prior to completion of the design plans. 11.6.: Encourage formation of Local Improvement Districts or other suitable programs for each action area to finance implementation of the design plans. sb/0387D ORO s 7-Ss s L i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87- 5-b AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER 18.66 TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE — ACTION AREAS (ZOA 87-04) WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and 1 WHEREAS, the Planning staff held public hearings before the City of Tigard Planning Commission on September 8 and October 6, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held ,public hearings on the proposed changes on September 21 and October 12 and 26, 1987. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Community Development Code shall be amendod as shown in Exhibit "A" as Chapter 18.86. Section 2: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that this amendment be made with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to 40 exist, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the Recorder. PASSED: By u n ani m oLl..S vote of all Council memberssMent after being read by number and title only, this -- day of O C �Objeer , 1987. City Reco er APPROVED: This day of OGfc.�IRPX 1987 7 q} 6 Thomas M. Brian, Mayor i Approved as to form: L AWL Ci Attor Aey Date cs/03870 ORDINANCE NO. 87-5-0 (ZOA 87-04) EXHIBIT "A" 18.86 ACTION AREAS 18.86.010 Purpose This Chapter is designed to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for Action Areas which include provisions for a mixture of intensive land uses. 18.86.015 Applicability The provisions of this chapter apply to Action Areas as designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map — Land Use. All development within an Action Area is subject to the review and application requirements under sections 18.120.010 — 18.120.100 and Chapter 18.130 as modified below: 18.86.020 Permitted Uses Permitted Uses allowed in an Action Area shall be as specified in the underlying zoning district. 18.86.030 Prohibited Uses for New Developments (a) Outdoor storage of materials, products, or supplies. No expansion of existing outdoor storage area will be permitted. (b) Overnight on—site outside storage of fleet vehicles in excess of two single axle trucks. (c) Overnight on—site outside storage of construction equipment. 18.86.035 Conditional Uses (a) Drive—up windows. (See standards contained in Chapter 18.130.) (b) Any other use specified as a conditional use in the underlying zone. 18.86.040 Interim Requirements In the absence of an adopted design plan, the following issues, under subsection C, must be addressed for new developments as necessary to serve the use and provide for projected public facility needs of the area, pursuant to Chapter 18.164 as determined by the Planning Director. A. The City may attach conditions to any development within an Action Area prior to adoption of the Design Plan to achieve the following objectives: (1) The development shall address transit usage by residents, employees, and customers if the site is within one quarter mile of a public transit line or transit stop. Specific items to be addressed are as follows: USD fs7 —S'L � � 4 s f (A) Orientation of buildings and facilities towards transit services to provide for direct pedestrian access into the building(s) from transit lines or t stops; (B) Minimizing transit/auto conflicts by providing direct pedestrian access into the buildings with limited crossings in automobile circulation/parking areas. If pedestrian access crosses automobile circulation/parking areas, paths shall be marked for pedestrians; (C) Encouraging transit supportive users by limiting automobile support services to collector and arterial streets; and, (D) Avoid the creation of small scattered parking areas ; by allrwing adjacent developments to use shared surface parking, parking structures or under y structure parking. 4 (2) The development shall facilitate pedestrian/bicycle circulation if the site is located on a street with 4 designated bikepaths or adjacent to a designated greenway/open space/park. Specific items to be addressed are as follows: (A) Provision of efficient, convenient, and continuous pedestrian and bicycle transit circulation systems, linking developments within the Action Area, and surrounding developments by requiring dedication and construction of pedestrian and bikepaths identified in the Comprehensive Plan. If direct connections cannot be made, require that funds in the amount of }} the construction costs be deposited into an account E for the purpose of constructing paths; (B) Separation of auto and truck circulation activities from pedestrian areas; (C) Encouraging pedestrian—oriented design by requiring pedestrian walkways and street level windows along all sides with public access into the building; (D) Provision of bicycle parking as required under Section 18.105.020(p) of the Tigard Municipal Code; and, (E) Insure adequate outdoor lighting by lighting pedestrian walkways and auto circulation areas. (3) Coordination of development within the Action Area. Specific items to be addressed are as follows: (A) Continuity and/or compatibility of landscaping, circulation, access, public facilities, and other improvements. . Allow required landscaping areas to be grouped together. Regular shared access where appropriate. . Prohibit lighting which shines on adjacent property; ORO and orientation of land usewhich COSI Screen nsider surrounding (g) Siting d land uses or an adopted plan. loading areas and refuse d��mpsters from view. Screen commercial and industrials la dscapingeSand from single family residential through (C) Provision of frontage roads or shared access where feasible. cs/0387D i t t i i T G f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87-5 AN ORDI(JANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZC 87-06) PROPOSED BY THE CITY. WHEREAS, the City has requested a zone change to assign the Action Area Overlay to the property shown on the map attached as Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their' regular meetings on September 8 and October 60 1987 and made a recommendation to City Council; and WHLREAS, a public hearing was held before City Council on September 21 and October 12, 1987 to consider the Commission recommendation. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as outlined below: Policy 2.1.1 is met because the Neighbor-hoodopportunities g Organization r eview ion and interested citizens have had proposal. Policy 5.1.3 is met because as an Action Area the CBD will be the focus of a Special Design Plan which will consider economic ^ viability. The policies contained in Section 11.6 of Special Areas of Concern will be met because the City intends to implement the Design Plan requirement in this area. Section 2: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that this amendment be made with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the Recorder. ORDINANCE NO. 87-5--) Page 1 PASSED: By V h a h itYttx l5 vote of all Council members resent after being read by number and title only, this �' day of D C fv�2X 1987. 1:�-en 'tvl City \ corder (a rh ;ne w�ea�lQy ll epi , APPROVED: This , day of C—, 1987. ` 0 Thomas M. 6:•ian, Mayor Approved as to form: c -k � Cit At orney I C) 16-7 Date 3b/0387D ORDINANCE NO. 87—�2 Page 2 '.rr.y��a.y.• �n t t 1� � wry t'�� I'• �t�r. ±y'r X61. L PAP •,•� . � n CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87—,5g AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING VACATION OF A PORTION OF SW 69TH AVENUE, A DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT—OF- JAY AND ADJOINING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN WAY LEE, A RECORDED PLAT, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code and ORS 271. 130, and WHEREAS the reason and purpose for this vacation is to assist with the completion of the SW 68th Parkway Avenue Street LID No. 35, and WHEREAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 271.100, the TMC Section 15.08.110, the Council fixed a time and place for the public hearing and Recorder published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area, as described in ORS 271.080; and WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on October 26, 1987, finds the public interest will riot be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and 44 WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate a portion of 69th Avenue right—of-way and adjoining public utility easements; the Council finds that the owners of a majority of the area affected, computed under ORS 271.080, have not objected in writing to the vacation; the Council finds that the vacation will not substantially affect the market value of any abutting properties; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following condition is necessary to vacate said land: 1. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance, and a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington Countv Clerk, Assessor and Surveyor. REM THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of a portion of SW 69th and adjoining public utility easements as described and shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B," and by this reference made part hereof. Section 2: The Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be subject to the following condition: ORDINANCE NO. 87—!)9' Page 1 a. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance, and a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor and Surveyor. fi Section 3. In no situation shall this Ordinance be effective until the 31st day after its enactment by the City Council and approved by the Mayor. PASSED: By U 1\aAi MoU5 vote of all Council members resent after beingread by number and title only, this (iN� day of Go�P,r' 1987. tereeR-M}i- son, City Recorder C&4er-ne hPaFl e� APPROVED: This day of �G'f'�YJ�1 ' , 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor Approved as to form: Afttorrnj�e-y-'F— /0/">4-C'ty Date ORDINANCE NO. 87- Page 2 t • - r , c Exhibit "A" ' 3 qpo rtion of SW 69th Avenue in the northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County Oregon being more � particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which bears N 890 43' 42" W t.00 foot from the southerly. corner of Lot 2, WAY IEE, a recorded plat of said county's plat records, said 4 point being on a cui-ve concave to the northeast having a radius of 171.00; feet; thence northwesterly along said curve 180.52 feet through a central angle of 600 29' 03"; thence S 290 29' 01" E 141.22 feet to a non—tangent curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 221.00 feet; thence along said curve 81.07 feet through a central angle of 210 01` 05"; thence N OG° 40' am 01" W 50.00 fest to the point of beginning.sm FIRM s am cs/07770 I t t 4[ I l 1 =Nis t G`} 1 1 f(x 1 S - r LOT 2 • -N- I 6 i Po.-/ion o 'tiv••. S.lr/. G9�' � /o l film mm f .AREA DESCRIBE® --- f IN EXHIMT A • • ' Q R�/7/.GAO Q = GO°'29 '03" 22 22/. 00 /3/4;er S/. 4 7 ® N 00 O y0'O�'°�i�`/ .sb,00 ilia Elms • - i k I s 1 i i 1 1 9 r Exhibit B A portion of Lot 2 WAY LEE, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being: a recorded plat of said county's plat records, situated in the northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 #st, Willamette Meridian , being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Lot 2; thence North 000 40' 00" West 10 feet to a non—tangent curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 161 feet; thence westerly and northerly along said curve 170.90 feet i through a central angle of 600 49' 09"; thence S 600 55' 24" W 10 feet to the east right-of-wady line of SW 69th Avenue as shown on the plat of said WAY LEE, said point also being on a non—tangent curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 171.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve 100.52 feet through a central aggle of 600 49' 09" to the point of beginning. ' i i f i r •� i r r i i d L � t 4 (f t . 1 f s i f f >,w t `3•yy '.•.tib"' :,ia:', E; 1• S t3 Fac. 'µ��h•�'y+�' „ r 'y f r x .3 �+S y /� -✓ jL�, l'v) �'F+(' 1' �._. � ., RS J'C-,q � t Y '.N• �� �: f �'b ti .. l �. t-F x�.t \t ; [ l .� . y f .,..; •..; �s _ .. .a... y.w;..: ��..� ... U...:. .. _..a. ...,,1 .:: � - s .:�� .,. "' .y. .��+. .r. ...'f .y .._:;�' r. T:a. .. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING SYNOPSIS OCTOBER 26, 1987 o STUDY SESSION - Review agenda topics 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call - All except Schwartz 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (No one spoke.) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: 3.1 Approve Council minutes: 10/1/87; 10/7/87 3.2 REPORTS: Receive and File a. Departmental Monthly Reports - September, 1987 Community and Administrative Services Community Development Library Police 3.3 Board and Committee Appointments: a. NPO Appointments - Resolution No. 87-129 b. Budget Committee, Planning Commission, Park Board, Transportation and Utilities and Franchise Board/Committee Appointments - Resolution No. 87-130 3.4 Approve Call Public Hearing (12-7-87) for Utility Easement Vac. - Lots 4 and 5 of Amart Summerlake - Res. 087-131 3.5 Approve Call Public Hearing (12-7-87) for Utility Easement Vac. - Lots 131 and 132 of Kneeland Estates 02 Subd. - Res. No. 87-132 3.6 Authorize hiring of a Word Processing Operator and centralized dictation system - Resolution No. 87-_Tabled - 11/2/87 3.7 Approve condemnation proceedings - SW 130Lh Avenue 3.6 Receive and file underground of utility lines memorandum (unless pulled for discussion and direction from Council) Ea/Jo - UA - With 3.6 and 3.7 removed. Consideration of 3.7: Jo/Ed -UA 4. ACTION AREA OVERLAY CPA 87-03, ZOA 87-09 AND ZC 87-16 o Public Hearing Opened o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council: ORDINANCE NO. 87-55 Ea/Jo - UA ORDINANCE NO. 87-56 Jo/Ed - UA ORDINANCE NO. 67-57 Ed/Ea - UA 5. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY FOR SW 68TH PARKWAY LID NO. 35 Ea/Ed - UA - Motion authorizing Mayor 6 City Recorder to dispose of parcels 1 through 3, 7-act A, and Tract B, amd add Frank M. Warren, Sr. as property owner - parcel 2. 6. PUBLIC HEARIrG - STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION - SW 69TH AVENUE AND ADJOINING UTILITY EASEMENTS o Public Hearing Opened o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council: ORDINANCE NO. 87-58 Jo/Ed UA 7. ACCEPT FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SET PUBLIC HEARING (11/23/87) FOR SPREADING ASSESSMENTS - LID 035 PHASE V - RES. NO. 87-133 Ea/Jo UA 8. FORFEITURE OF SEIZED PROCEEDS - ORDINANCE NO. 07-_ Tabled - 11/2/87 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 9.1 Councilor Johnson reported on 11/2/87 County elected officials caucus: Chair Hayes presentation an process bequi in Washington County - Oregon Tour-ism Alliance - part of Governor's Economic Development Program. Cex*T desires to get piss going as quickly as possible — Task Force is to be established. Task Force will need too representatives from cities. Meeting to be set on November 3, A, or 5 - hosted b7 Tigard - for six east-side cities to get information on the Alliance (Coars" representative tf will be asked to attend) and select a representative. s 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Cancelled i 11. ADJOURNMENT 8:18 p.m. cw/14080 Y J k TON IuG - otherwise specified 50,000 or major fraction thereof € E. Hotels or office 25,000- 40,000 1 B buildings 40,000-100,000 2 8 s each additional t 100,000 or major fraction thereof 1 additional 8 i 3 F. Schools over 14,000OF 1 8 t , 89.4 Uses not specifically mentioned. In the case of a use not specifi- cally mentioned, the requirements for off street loading facilities shall be the same as the above mentioned use which, as determined by the Planning Director, is i. most similar to the use not specifically mentioned. ' i 89.5 Concurrent different uses. When any proposed structure will be used concurrently for different purposes, final determination of loading requirements t will be made by the Planning Directot but in no event shall the loading requirements be less than the total requirement for each use based upon its aggregate floor area. f 89.6 Location of required loading facilities. The off-street loading i facilities required for the uses mentioned in this ordinance shall be in all cases on the same lot or parcel of land as the structure they are intended to serve. In If no case shall the required off-street loading space be pert of the area used to satisfy the off-street parking requirements. 89.7 Nmrwwr of using loading areas. No space for loading or unloading of vehicles shall be so located that a vehicle using such loading space projects into any public street. Loading space shall be provided with access to any alley, or if no alley adjoins the lot, with access to a street. Any required front, side or rear yard may be used for loading unless otherwise prohibited by this ordinance. f 89.8 Mbdification of Requirements. The Facilities Review Committee may modify the off-street loading requirements as they apply to any individual case only for good cause shown, and it shall set reasonable safeguards and conditions to insure that any such modification conforms to the intent of this ordinance. Modification may be granted if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the committee that loading operations of the use or structure in question will not interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic on a public street. 90 Drive-up Window Facilities. Drive-up window facilities shall be designtvi to provide safe, torr- venient and erf irnent traffir flow. i B. Restaurants, financial and other canmercial establishments providing drive-lip window facilities shall be reviewed by the Facilities Review committee in accordance with Section 13!,. For t he rmu re, the 1 3185 Facilities: Review Committee shall review the proposed development to determine that the following standards are addressed in the design: 1. Restaurants providing drive-up window service shall have suffi- cient parking and sooting to accommodate anticipated customer p volume. IlC1! 2. Restaurants providing drive-up window service shall provide at least two (2) designated parking spaces immediately beyond the service window, or provide other satisfactory methods, to allow customers requiring excessive waiting time to receive their food vh ile parked. 3. Financial and other conmercial establishments providing drive-up window facilities ►hide do not provide for walk-in customer service (i.e., not allowing transactions within the structure) shall provide for safe, convenient and readily accessible ex- terior walk-up window service, such as an automatic teller ma- chine, at any time during regular business hours. -Additionally, at a minimum, two parking spaces shall be provided allowing convenient access to the walk-up service window. !' 4. The coign of the stacking area shall be reviewed by the Fecil- sties Review.Committee to allow customers' vehicles to leave the i" stacking line for emergency reasons. (ORD 3293) 5. On-eiLe parking for walk-in custeaers shall be designed to be readily accessible to all public entrances to the building and to provide safe, convenient access. 6. Establishments having drive-up window facilities shall have sufficient stacking area to insure that prblic right-of-wars are not obstructed. 7. Communications sound systems shall not exceed a measurement of 55 decibels at the adjoining property line(s). C. Drive-up window facilities shall be a public nuisance to be coated pursuant to Ordinance 12 i8, or its successors, if the traffic at the facility causes obstruction or interference with the right-of-way or flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic as described in Section 14.A of Ordinance 1218. Abatement methods may include summary abatement, i clnsure or redesiga of t.h dr;ve—p facility. The Beaverton Pnlice Q 9t1all h:rve the au'.ir.ri.o tr, i,,r.ve r_itatinrr3 to drivers of :rotor vetticler; utotruct.ln•1 ,�. Inc r aj,t-cf-way or -.n1vr1er:.l4 with traffic flog:. Ih(h 5?1y: ..,j.. 19 Section 91 reserved. 1 i 3/86 � i MEN- AGENDA ITEM # _ — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE Oct. 26, 1987 000 (Limited to Z minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAMF, b ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTAIN F-D MM 1 t i f t. l 4 t l t o,2- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 1987 DATE SUBMII'I'ED: October 15, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report PREVIOUS ACTION: Community Services Dept. _ Se tember, 198 PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMEN OKVICY REQUESTED BY: Mayor and Council ISSUE Community Services Department Monthly Report for September, 1987 INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached, please find the Community Services Department Monthly Report; for September, 1987. Ran ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED i I i FISCAL IMPACT i SUGGESTED ACTION Review and File dc: '446p/0015p MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor arid City Council October, 15, 1987 FROM: Jill Monley, Community Services Director SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Repor-L for September, 1987 COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION We conducted a claillv.s, r-oVi*.,w with S.A.I .11'. and adjusted reserves for outstanding worker compensation claims. Based on this review it appears wo' ll be receiving a refund from S-0-I -V . Again this year. This refund should Occur in February or March. In view of our rolal:ivoly good claims experience over the last four years arid since our three yotar aorvomont with S.A.I .V . is open thi s Spring wherein we' 11 be roquos t i rig proposals from workers compensation rarr io rs, It !j o e iii S appropriate Lo o xj.aiij i ne i.h o A I t v r r i,.,a t. i v e of self ins u raric o for th i purpose. Wt?1 11 be bey i rin i rig this his examination in late OcLob(�r. A random poll regard i rig L rcA i ni rig prof orencos was conducted of existing members on our Boards and Co"I'llitt00s. Results focused in two .,Aroas: communication skills development arid y o v v r-rime n t.a I structure and process undors tand i rig. A tr-eaining session focusing on communication skills is plAriripd for, early November. Questions were raised as a piArt of our 1986/87 audit regarding f u rid i rit-:1 .Levels of our Police. Pension plan. As a result of that arid anticipating pension to be an issue in Upcoming I .P.O.A. negotiations, we plan to conduct a pension analysis this Fall and Winter. FINANCE The 5 Year Plan was updated with recent revenue and expenditure developments . In addition, the 5-Year Plan is now on a micro computer spread sheet that allows instantaneous update for various scenarios. The 5-Year Plan will be prinLod from the micro in the near future making it a more flexible and meaningful document. Tentative audit results were made available during September indicating higher than anticipated beginning fund balances in almost all funds. A supplemental budget hearing before the Budget Committoo is planned for January, 1988 at which time beginning fund balance and revenue estimate adjustments along with expenditures carried over from 1986--87 will be presented for adoption. We have begun to maximize the city' s return on investments by taking funds out of the Government Pool and in investing them in Jumbo C.D. ' s. We. have been able to negotiate interest rates of .65% higher than the Government Pool. We will continue to monitor investment opportunities to maximize city revenue We have begun the foreclosure process as directed by City Council in 1985 on delinquent Bancrofted Special Assessment Accounts. Our procPdurps have been formulated by the City Attorney's office. The first foreclosures will be on property owned by Mary Burnham and Lionel Domreis which account for about $150 000 in unpaid principal and interest. Community Services Monthly Report Page 2 ACCOUNTING SECTION: Currently, a process is being developed to collect delinquent sewer and storm drainage charges. We have never pursued the collection of delinquent accounts other than to turn them over- to the county tax assessor each year. We will monitor the performance of this process to determine its effectiveness. CITY RECORDER SECTION The Recor•der•'s office continued work on follow-up for recent annexations including census taking, map revisions, new election precinct numbers and map, follow-up letters and notification to utilities and property owner". The International Institute of Municipal Clerks News Digest published an article on the availability of the Boar•dsmanship Manual prepared by this office Thirteen clerks in the U.S. and Canada purchased copies. -the City Recorder and Deputy Recorder attended the Oregon Association of Municipal Recorders meeting. Updated information was received frost; the State Archivist and on the latest annexation procedures and open meeting law procedures . am The TMC update was proofed by the City Recorder and help is continuing wiLh research projects in the City archives. RECORDS_SF:CTION Ann +Dourget has been selucted as our now records clerk. She comes from thc, City of Portland and has a strong records background. She will start October 12. -fhe Records Management Committee met to discus;s revisions to t:he work plan. In the two months we have been without a records clerk, the progr-am h.as gotton behind . File security is another .issue thol. is being addressed . Collection of / information from different- sections regard irig films kept ire work arras and a , , whether they nc„d to be in fisc..--proof cabinet:s i�r• not is being re,c.arehcd . COURT SECTION The number of citations received continues to be up compared to last year. Misdemeanor and violation filings have doubled from previous months . While relieving for vacation coverage more insight into the workload generated ideas for streamlining the process . Attendance at the Oregon Association of Court Administrator' s Confer-onco gave us information on new legislation affecting Municipal Court:. A new ordinance changing the fine and bail schedules reflect the new laws. Collections are going well. Outstanding fines are remaining nearly the same and more revenue is being brought in than in the last three month of FY 86/87. The Information Counter had 991 contacts and writing of receipts this month. An average of 45 contacts times 1 .5 minutes each equals over one hour• per day when 1 court clerk is unable to work on court related issues. OFFICE SERVICES 1,334 calls were received at the Message Center (average of 63.5 calls per day). The majority of the messages were taken for Police, Planning and Building. The process of ordering telephone equipment per Council authorization has begun. Implementation is anticipated in Mid-November. Word Processing work orders and production have more than doubled since this time last year. This has required the Office Services Manager- to spend more time in production than in monitoring and planning for the word processing, phone and office supply functions. This is creating a difficult- situation for other i departments of the city who depend on these city-wide support services. dc:1446p/0015p COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT WORK MEASURES SEPTEMBER, 1987 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 9/86 9/87 SEWER: 9/66 9/87 Accounts Payable Checks: 355 365 Sewer bills sent li 5215 6057 Vendors 882 771 Sewer payments 4483 6089 Invoices 403 254 Phone calls 420 516 Check requests 367 312 Treasurer's Receipts 796 864 Payroll checks 227 275 New Customer & Add. chg. 314 5O7 No and Adjustments Purchase Orders Processed 127 74 HM SIM RECORDER'S OFFICE Year- to-Date, 9/86 9/87 Resolutions processed 112 12.0 Ordinances processed 46 54 OFFICE SERVICES 9/86 9/87 Number of W.P. Work Orders 2.37 521 Number of Pages processed in W.P. 10,815 25, 147 Average Turn-Around Time Per Work Order 4.4 5.7 hrs PERSONNEL 9/86 9/$7 Recruitments 4 2 Hires 16 5 Terminations 3 1 Unemployment Claims 0 1 Claims Filed: Worker's Compensation 2 1 Other Liability 1 0 1446p/0015p i i 08/01/87 CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT LOSS DATE CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 2/04/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 01/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending (Office Merrill) 07/2.0/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer- Har-burg) claim reopened 03/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pendirig 07/25/86 R.A. Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path pending 04/06/86 Scott Fairbanks Code Enforcement negligence CLOSED W/OUT PMT 9/29/87 07/10/86 Thomas Ar•nholtz Hit manhole cover opon 06/2?../86 Jerri Willner Alleges grievance re O.T.hr•s. open 10/01/86 Hue Thi Phan Intersection accident reopened $1404.88 pd . Police vehicle & claimants other claims pending vehicle - personal injuries 11/24/86 Michael Ryan) Damage to home:; & contents open Ransom Boyce) due to flooding 01/09/87 Tuality Comm. Hosp. Allege City pray for- treatment open of minor child after officers called to home by mother because father vias causing child abuse to infant. Off icer Boothby 1/86 & 8/86 Charles Condon Alleges employee ha-assment: open and stress claim 10/23/86 Various (possibly lort claim alleges civil CL..OSE[)-•W/OUT PMT 37 in all) rights deprived when arrested 9/17/87 for a political demonstration at Flir Systems. 12/05/86 William R. Briot Alleges officers assulted & open battered him while being arrested causing injury. (Mayor Brian, Chief Lehr, Sgt. Martin, Officer Nerski, Officer Harbur•g, & Officer Warren. ) 8/29/87 Norman & Pete Officer responding to call open Sepenuk vehicles collided. Officer Wulf dc:1446p/0015p IF C NON-STAFF RESOURCES/VOLUNTEER REPORT SEPTEMBER, 1987 YTD EST. Category 1985-86 1986-87 September '87 1987-88 1987-88 % Change Boards & Committees 3,108.75 2,601.75 255.5 441.5 1,766. -32X Volunteer Staffing 5,171.25 7,272. 508. 1,671. 6,684. -8% TCYS N/A N/A 6. 1,167. 4,668. +100% swim Community Service 562. 2,387.25 91.25 675. 2,700. +13X Other 283. 264.5 -0- 80. 320. +21X Total: 10,739.5 12,688.5 860.75 4,034.5 16,138. +27X i sb/1377p/0015p i i c 17,000 I 16,C, YJ f 15,000 r 14,000 13,000 12,000 ° I 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 ! 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 86/87 87/88 RIM f+ CITY OF TIGARD, 0_ REGiIV COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGE,� : DA OFOctober 26 1987 DFlTE SUBMIT['ED: October 13, 1987 _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report PREVIOUS ACTION: September, 1987_ — Communit Dev De PI PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan DEPT HEAD OK :iTY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: OL.ICY ISSUE INFORMATION fcUMMf1RY Attached please find the Monthly Report for Septombor 1987 prepared by the Department of Community Development. ram mum Fll [FRNAI]VF S CONS I[)L Rt _ Accept- and place in file. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place in file. sb/0950P/0022P C MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD �. TO: Members of the City Council October 13, 1987 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report - September, 1987 The Department of Community Development reports the following September activity: - Building - The permit issuance pace picked up for- family and commercial . As the permits for the planned larger commercial projects are paid for, revenues and total valuations will increase greatly, The totals for, September reflect permit issuances for one such project. - CCPTF - The bask Force held a very successful breakfast meeting for downtown property owners and businesses. The mooting included a presentation of the many options formulated by the PSU study. Now that the 'Task Force has become more well known to the public, input from .interested parties should increase. - Codes Enforcement -- Voluntary correction of intersection sight visibility issues continues. Twenty-five such problems were corrected in September. Of the 432 cases opened for vision clearance in 1987, 40 percent havr_ now been resolved. A visible improvement has been made at many intersections. Planning - Current planning activity is still trending high. The counter activity and construction monitoring have delayed some code streamlining activity. A revised schedule of code amendments is being worked up. - Parks - The Parks crew is finishing work at the Civic C^neer. Preparation of areas to receive sodding was accomplished in September. A large amount of staff time is scheduled for October completion of Civic Center landscaping. Wastewater and Streets - Regular programs continued with some breakdown of equipment. Both the sweeper and Bomford brushing units continued to develop maintenance problems. Some new equipment to replace or supplement that used on the programs will arrive soon. _ - Engineering Services - Review of public improvement documents has not slowed down Several projects have been submitted for review by developers who are rushing to beat the winter rains. In addition, field inspections are placing a strain on the section due to the high volume of commercial construction activity. sb/0950P/0022P L i BUILDING SECTION — SEPTEMBER COMPARISON Following is a comparison of building activity for September of 1986 and 1987: September, 1986 September., 1987 Single Family Permits 37 38 Multi—Family Permits (units) 0 0 Commercial Permits (new) 2 6 Building Permit Fees $ 15,351 .80 $ 23,2.30.50 Plan Check Fees $ 8,214.43 $ 10,250.08 Plumbing Permits $ 9,262.50 $ 5,588. 10 Mechanical Permits $ 1,750.00 $ 1,696.50 Valuation $2.,749,418.00 $5,025,391 .00 CALENDAR YEAR Jan_. Sept. — 1986 Jan-.—.-- Sopt. -- 1987 Single Family Permits 359 31.4 Multi-•Family Permits (units) 116 40 Commercial Permits (new) 24 28 Building Permit. Fees $ 174,502.66 $ 166, 149.02. Plan Check Fees $ 93,889.63 $ 78,329.2.6 Plumbing Permits $ 56,257.90 $ 50,987. 10 C Mechanical Permits $ 10,794.50 $ 13,707.00 Valuation $39,755,892.00 $36,876,327.00 i i FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON 1985/86 — 1.986/87 i s July -- Sept. — 1986 July — Sept. — 1987 Single Family Permits 135 100 ? Multi—Family Permits (units) 16 0 j Commercial Permits (new) 12 7 Building Permit- Fees $ 67,208.94 $ 68,078.00 Plan Check Fees $ 37,212.97 $ 27,922.21 s Plumbing Permits $ 23,920.00 $ 16,635.60 Mechanical Permits $ 5,089.00 $ 4,025.00 Valuation $14,527,988.00 $13,205,550.00 sb/0950P/0022P l f rt� U L C) .-t M .-i .+ .-+ N O� .-•� N •--I .-i .--i .--i O G1 .--� ,--i C �7 .--� � F E O U Co0 N O O O O O O £ O O O O O 00 O O O O O .� N d •.Ci rn M m O ko M in M h M m O cc ON %o ON s h m ON tl C7 M C C N M ? C LO m CV .•. N N M C M N M M N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G .+ 'n O 0 an O tC) O O O O ttf to Lt) UY) u" O Ln O U') O UI vO h m d -+ rn N h O N .•+ Ln co 4:r h C+ �c %0 O tl %D•«� m N N M , h N .4 to w h tl tC (7� — -:rM N O 0) w C� %0 O M h h m X) h tl %0 O h ., N %0 U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O )n Lo C+ 0 Ln O Ln O Ln O O O an O Ln 0 O O Ln O -+ 2 � N h N h h O N in N fit? �!'1 h h Lf) t0 N :n in r- O M 0 C I h O W h O %0 ON �o N < h M — to (14 C1 N O C tl J .•� C� N r� •tom C) CN C '-' fV N < tl N O, �o Q? r+ Ln (` H � j ? h 11; m < ? tl W U tl M N 1c lr n Q z H Y m rn h m < < N N M d O to �o h C C� h h con C, d in U'1 Ln < h Lro d %0 4o (7� M m m .-� C+ O . H S m %0 N v+ %0 h a C% ? O Ln LO rn s to ON tl o+ m m G Iz M %0 %0 m O %0 N — tl G %0 tl O1 N M C� tl tl tl Lri m %0 M tl (7% N < LP ch tl G O M M Ln O N �E h C h -+ W M ? ? tl M N 1n C; In C tl IcIccl m O a .a Ln O o, Ln m Lr, < h tl s O O O tr O to O Ln Ln Ltl LP) -+ O O h < N On C+ C %0 �+ O Q Cr o1 d Ln h CO - d Ln M CO o+ m tl %0 m --+ ILM r. h m d co -+ %0 O 'O co M Ln m Ln m CO M M O tl N kD -+ N m h cn O m do Io u'1 cn C+ d C+ d 10 U N m a L!) m .•-i .•+ .-+ N .•y N N N -� -•� -� N N N .D .-t d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o o 0 O o 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U 31 h c O O C� O O O co O O O O O AT fl- co at © -. .+fl N tl N %0 m r� N O -4 O < O O �D N tl tl -+ C + m jC� C. to %0 m m m N < Lo to O Ct m C+ :n O C+ O N h O Ln 4; %0 < C C) M 11; C; h cl h cl cl M r•! lr c0 .0- O co m C+ < m < 0 0 Ln 0 CO O O O -+ v: N h lc M C. tl r� .•t 10 h CI N N t0 N Ci C < O CO m O O_ . N ( N M m V) N kO t0 10 N -4 4 N M M to m N Ln < m to NO O L L- � a J L L T d G. L M -OL CJ 37 a L t2 O an %) v0' 7 L U •,- CJ T 7 J.+ O 9 N h 7 L U .t cv --,N � 4j 0 a ` C co .f] L L T C .-y CP 0. J-j 7 U CD C -0 L T C C) t5 d 3 CL 0 = 7 O w U O 0 C1 z U' •3 2 m =s � h 6 m 0 LL. £ ¢ £ h r7 Q Cri O Z O •+ h LL. £ Q £ u 0 ,-� C Ln ON O N .-t N C LO V h �+ r+ O •-+ N t0 •-+ N cq E .-� N N N N N N ti .--i .•ti N N N E O v � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %0 %0 1.0 10 Co oD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N .4 •.Cr Q1 N v'1 0 .-i d CT N o1 N to N h d h %0 C N CD d C N tD N to a U •--+ N �0 �-+ L i i`� -4 C I� � .-4 .--i .••i N N M M M M C .••� ^'� �� N N N M REM azm0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 G . i Ln Ln 0 0 0 �? err 1.11 �n Ln o Ln ,n d n 0G O � ,n o u o r- O Vn %0 �n r�. v c "c co m m m O rn N N o h •.+ M 'n co .•+ N O N C 01 h C M ".0 �o co N C CA O .r o N C d m N O h h O h +n C O W d N CT CT %0 w O h J .•+ N M d C M d Ln .-y M �n to h ci O N M F- £ uJ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O G O H to O v. d o, 0% d d o+ CT C� 0) Ln Ln C Ln an Ln O O f" QQQ'''111 N O N O h h O Lin h N h d h N � �•+ � ^'� O. ON h Q C I QI r, h kO m m O O+ U) Cr N O m a- Q O+ = .•�11! Ci N a, C d M CO -s N crl 17 M N `0 N M ON .I.r E E( d N Co N h '14 0 %o d h d d N N M m C � a z O Y M Co to Co N %0 b O M h h N 0 d C T co Un co %0 ~ U %0 Ln O to N 1.0 M cc m n d N Z O N N H L M O m N ••o %0 it'% CT O �Ci .••, CT N C L* T m M h d h m h h d m n h r+ •• O 0+ h N H W O CC CD rn w o h Ln. �o m to h m O C o+ O m .•�i h .•� NM d Ln h CD C O` O O �� N m C O in ID h M a a H 1 O O N N 0-iiN "o tp t0 CO t0 h G O O O N N N N N m 0 d C}+ N h .-i = ".O h m m O O O n Ln d LCD m to N Cl) N %0 m 0) h CO CT O. CD O %0 h C N %0 r+ a1 M 'o 11; C h M --" d d (i CCJ t0 O to N C CA ri N t0 .•� M C I.0 w O M to h cD N aT m 67 N w C N d %0 mo O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . 1 7 h Ln to to C C Cr d N N N N 0 O C O m h in %0 h r+ N -4 M CT M O h h C� CT m m O t0 co h tCl h N M N fiS C� �n *•� Ln m N d m m om CT a N CD at M .-t h N 'a 'Ci o+ lc m h C C h O to �o -+ rt a m N h 0 to I'D h CD u7 'D C Ln t0 h m in h r` d h to d N m O h to w O %0 C:5 co N %D %0 d CA m CL N It; C� ai CD to 1 h Ch 111 m 'O N tC OD m .-� t0 N .-t .-r N M m M C C d N N elm 00 L L \ T CU L L T d n' T Ltin 4jE d j] S! L 4j E Ln I a, .0 %0 7 L u -+ CJ T 3 O y CJ h L U •+ CJ T +� O C co C -0 L L T C .-+ CSr C• .4J ? U co C 10 L L T C -4 01 \ O� r6 v m a 3 7 3 7 CD u O G (71 rd w It in LL F_ C £ h m C 0 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM ca— CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY y TO: Library Board Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Library Directo SUBJECT: Monthly Report for September 1987 WCCLS: Raymond Holt presented the preliminary draft of the Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) Report for Library Development in Washington County. Libraries were asked to conduct a pin map study during the week of Sep- tember 20 to determine where library users live. Study did not reveal new infor- mation. Friends of the Library: The Friends of the Library dedicated the Neva Root puppet theater on September 14. The Friends paid for the materials and Library Board member Walt Munhall designed and built the stage. Over 200 people attended. Acoustics and Lighting: Library Director met with architect Norman Dull to discuss acoustical and lighting problems. Some solutions were discussed. There was also a meeting with Dull and the City Administrator to discuss these issues. Workroom Shelving: City Council approved purchase of Spacesaver shelving for work- room at regular meeting on September 28. Volunteers: Thirty-seven volunteers gave 412 hours; daily average, 17.5 hours. Two CE2 students spent 17 hours on job exploration. Seven community service assignees worked 58.5 hours. Library Board gave 9 hours. Youth Services: No programming was scheduled. This month is always given to planning for the coming year with specific planning for the first quarter. The Children's Librarian reported to the Library Board on the story-times presented in Town Hall during the summer, recommending that the sessions be held in the Library. The Board concurred, recommending that steps to educate users as to when the "noisy" times will occur. Work Indicators: September 1987 September 1986 September 1985 Adult Materials 8,620 6,722 5,374 Juvenile Materials 4,659 _4,041 2,674 TOTAL 13,279 10,763 8,048 Days of Service 23.5 23 20 Average Daily Circulation 565 468 402 Hours of Service 219 212.5 186 Materials Circ per hour 61 51 43 Increase/Decrease Circ 23% 342 87 Reference/Reader's Advisory 403 375 204 Books in Use in Library 2,046 1,392 801 Materials Added/Withdrawn 371/24 278/0 673/0 Borrowers Registered 338 339 253 Story Time (V of sessions) NONE NONE NONE Special Children's Programs NONE NONE NONE Personal Computer Users 92 N/A N/A i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t i � ti TO: Mayor, Council., F City Adminis r�ator `' � October 15, 1987 FROM: David Lehr, Chief of Police Y 1 w;� SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report -- September, 1987 During the month of September Support Service Manager Carrick did a recruitment to e::tablish an eligibility list. for Dispatch positions . A list was established and a new dispatcher was hired to begin October 16. A joint task force meeting was held with Washington Square Security to dofine procedure protocol on emergency and nonemergF-�ncy call response. It was agreed that Washington Square Security would attend roll calls at Tigard Police Department to be aware of information that might impact the Squares security oper•at.ion. The Police Department also conducted four neighborhood watch kickoff organizational meetings. The Department will continue to work with these four neighborhoods to get them organized into neighborhood watch areas. the final f organization of the Copper Creek area was accomplished during September. I met with school officials and residenLs again on parking issues at -figar•d High School. The level of concern appears to be diminishing as we get increasingly better control over the situation. Concern about football parking is almost nil with parking allowed on the soccer field and high visibility police patrols. Daytime concerns are now down to littering and � some mailbox blocking. The Police Department will probably be bringing two ordinance changes to the Council to allow bag will of no parking signs for special events and expanding the mail zones . t Mrs. Carrick and I attended a County--wide meeting on 9-•1-1 . You have received a report on the results of that meeting in a separate communication. t I I continue to be involved in the Municipal Court Study. F The Patrol Division has prepared a plan to be effective October 1 to increase community in an effort to combat the increase in patrol visibility in the armed robberies. A metro areawide increase in armed robberies is occurring that may be linked to increased drug usage. Ms. Watros and other members of the Community Services Unit have been making plans for the Emergency Services Faire October 1 through October A. sb/1386D E, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26 1987 _ DATE SUBMITTE.D: O__ctober• 16, 1987 r ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: _ PREVIOUS ACTION: NPO Appointments 9/8/87 Planninq Commission Approval _ PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT BEAD OIC CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission LICY ISSUE Neighborhood Planning Organization Appointments INFORMATION SUMMARY At tho Planning Commission meeting of September 8, 1987, it: was recommended the following appointments be made to the Noighborhood Planning Organizations: Name NPOImm Term_Ex��i r��s Em Gurdon Martin 11K 12/31/91 Margaret Nolan #E3 12/31/91 John A. Nolan 118 12/31/91 Sue Siebold H0 12/31/91, Marjory Haglund 118 12/31/91 NPO 8 is a new Neighborhood Planning Organization formed by City Council for the recently annexed South Metzger area. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Appoint the individuals to the respect:ivo NPO' s. 2. Do riot appoint the individuals to the respective NPO's . FISCAL IMPAC-f SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate #1, approve the appointments to the NPO's as listed above. dc:1579K 49ew( July 27, 1987 Tigard Planning Commission City of Tigard P.O Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: NPO #4 Reappointment Dear Planning Commission: I am requesting reappointment to NPO #4 because I feel its my tahe in, and einformed of the future planning for the TigardTriangleand surrounding area. Thank you for considering my request. ` Sincerely, Gordon S. Martin CI° OF TI A CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 NAME: lj p r dcn '- .�. GZ r'] t h DATE: Z �J''�� 7 ADDRESS (RES.): 1226S- -5W 2z incl AUc"ue ? .1 RES. PHONE: 62U-2117-2 ADDRESS (BUS.): 142 SGU 72Kc.J 4vP-2BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: — WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: L O rq OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: 1OW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? tis' 1 PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: N 1A4c-t-w A 0L ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Al P D `7 Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO _nide City Outside City (1172W) 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397.Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 Sr i 3 �I F TIi CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Service 9961-7986 NAGE: a DATE: S ADDRESS C t' i RES. PHONE: A'tQ ADDRESS (BUS.): ' BUS. PHONE: t LENGTH OF RESIDENCE iN TIGARD: •-F-� 1'j Q au SUGGESTED BY: r WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:�4H�r� 1 ae r_ r ►!. c N,...b .1' �yt"r,✓.G X ��o� f�'G1� rl.L� j OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Rrq i� �-� ,,u.�l yc ---�---�� IAT 11, i i 4 HOW LONG -IbM YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? - �!6 ��f APPLICAN IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO TS ONLY)? t` PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: t OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): RY, r..►,„�iW��__s�G,�,f.�.,P.n.;:S;Ac 1k”rIff. nf[9} BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: jJ Date received at City Hall N+~ � Date Interviewed Board Date Appointed , Committee, or NPO inside City Outside City (1172W) i 13125 SW Nail Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CITY TIVARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of SeMce 1961-1986 NAME; DATE:A A ' ADDRESS (RES.): Mgo 3 vo RES. PHONE: 2p - II -I ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE TIGARD: 0 /Q 40,4gs SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU.LIVE PREVIOUSLY? 1� gfl,-- Oil . EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: l HOW LONG JIM YOU. BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? g eo rs IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: �11f( CfUh F pu•Aeas DmFue-3 111ol (tub Wing, It&6I OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: � () Date received at City HaW61 q 1 I fI` n2A12338 Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside Citv Outside City (1172W) 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 C ITY F T��®4 CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION ��E w 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 NAME: (30�i) i DATE: b i ADDRESS (RES:): ((Zno aw g'� �� 3 RES. PHONE: (o s 7-S 1117 ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: _SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? �K EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: �(4il" OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: �• +�. � 1 S �rGUt$ ��'`�°� � �g'r e� HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AR* (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? OG�TZftnO PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: &9041l2D ICA" (eadmr MeNAIM ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: o 14, q OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: 10 L7 y/jq" fik.— rcUl Q�Le ' r_—�--------------------------- Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (1172W) 93'125 SW Nall BNd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 FM I Septembeh 2, 1987 To: Diane M. Je.tdenka P.tanning Comw:z4.ion Secnetany ' City of T.igand F,%om: Ma�tjeay Hagtund 1105 S.W. Halt B.tvd. T.cgatd, Oregon mom Re: Appointnent to NPO Number. 8 1mom My neaaons bot becoming a membex of NPO Number 8 ane as Jottma: My numbex one objective woutd be to Wng the aAea .into a eohe Ave group to enabte ebjective p:.annueg. At the meetinga ptioit to annexation to Tdgaad, Jeau and emotions weu expw4ed nathen than fact-6&ing and objectivity; .i.e., o.tde)c nea-idents expA".6ing jean o f to6 ng.the i& homes and yyounger n.ea.i.dents de" o f the• "CLty of T.�gand." L.jut these. a}'Jpnehena.iona need to be,Laid-to neat by xetiab.te in6oAwtion .in oadeA to pnog&",6 .into ebjective devetopme+tt. Since I have tGived here gat tkihty yeau, I beti.eve 1 could Attate to the otdeAl,"A.idente, and my expenience at Ponttand Community Cottege, AM I worked with many dii jelunt ages and types of people, would enable me t4 co,%muAjcate wet,G with the younger. naa.i dQnta. Atso, nn,s.idents on main thonoughjanea need a nepnesentative to express their conce�na in Jutute deva� -► ; conce�uia which can . vwm those o hea.ideats on the a etxeets. Even though we atttena�ed MetzgeA W meetings to express our pnobteff4, we�e,tt - these we;tq not addnet.sed when the plan jot the area P=6 a milted to the County. S.inte I Live on HaU.B.tvd., I could undeutand and atteimpt to keep communication .Groes open to netieve appaehena.i.on in JutuAt ptanning. I extend my apotog,iea bot not attending the meeting and woutd be happy to meet with you at yout eonve i.ence .ii you w Uh. Thank you, (2 .-W a� f c1 d Y t CIIYOFTIFARD , CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Service . 1961-1986 NAME: Ct ' DATE: i `• /^ ADDRESS (RES.): 114,7, C�L`(-f 3 ��' -- RES• PHONE: BUS. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): ES — lei r � LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: , t� SUGGESTED BY; WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? N EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: _ OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKG UND: HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS TRIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? n/I�'r-'� PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: 00, 0 1iER INFORMATION (GERiERAL REMt",S): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: y Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (1172W) 13125 SW Mall Blvd,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 16, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: Committee and Board Appointments PREPARED BY: Jill Monley DEPT HEAD OKOj- CITY ADMIN 6K REQUESTED BY: Appointments Advisory Com. Committee and Board Appointments INFORMATION SUMMARY The Appointments Advisory Committee met in a marathon session October 14, to interview 20 citizen who are interested in serving the City in An advisory capacity. At this time. the Committee is recommending the following nine appointments: Committee Name Teem Fx.L)j.KLLLrj Budget Committee George Burge-is 6/30/09 Deborah Hinton 6/30/90 Planning Commission Jill) Castilo 7/1/90 [)on Rosborou�.jh 7/1/90 Park Board Marty Welch 12131187 Carolyn DoFr-,.Ar)g 12/31/08 Mariann Rithor 12/31/80 Transportation Dick Walker 12131188 Utilities & Franchisos, Eldon Wogun 12/31/80 Kelly Rennols 12/31/88 In addition, we are recommending to the Planning Commission appointments of seven individuals to NPO' s and recommending to the Extension Service appointment of two individuals to CPO' s. Two other individuals are interested in Library Board or Friends involvement and staff will follow threigh. .......... ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Appointment of those individuals listed above. 2. Do not appoint any of the individuals listed above. 3. Appointment of selected individuals listed above. FISCAL IMPACT F. SUGGESTED ACTION Recommend alternative 01, to support the Appointments Advisory Committee recommendations listed above. dc: 1579p fu t! / AUN 231987 ITYOF TIG.QRD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION i NAME: c-C-) cL ir. {3 0 t,2inl>r SS DATE: — i r ADDRESS (RES.) : 1347 9 Cl?. Vfc-G-lfGE �Lc=nrK� 0 RES. PRUNE: 6 3 7 -0903 t ADDRESS (BUS. ): 3X5 13 & NE. S� SE M BUS. PHONE: 3 7 S l-O$ L LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIG py�rZ •�� YDS SUGGESTED BY: Z WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? NC w lrotz K - Po RTr-At 4/D- R Inez C7,S,0✓t= EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND. I�7C5T �"Y/y /'r-S C�GoNO pt(CS CGOv /rvG) -7 OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: TlzfiiySPo�2TrFTlo/y E'Gonro.+ts'r�L Pl-RXKr�I C� See.-r/o O,ZE 5 Tr lfwY. 1> V HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR HPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: BoAftt� o /zvsrBe5 wrST f/ra`S 3�PT/s7- clLy-x—clf ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: f OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): THUS, CUMML'CCtiE5 OR NPO IN"CERN5'l'EU IN: -L f'Tf T3-' �CrET -._•- -- I)ate ):rceived at City Hall — UatIncerk tt•ucd _ —•---- Date Appointed _ - Board, ( rnmttt :�• , ,t: if'tt ---- Inside Ct,Ly — (0346p) r C11Y F Tl1F CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST•APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Sen�ice 1961-1986 � DATE: � G NAME: �C� I i1J ADDRESS (RES.): ("S `��t') Li -I?tea��� o� c RES. PHONE: Com b" ADDRESS (BUS.):, �'�` �w �fy- jR�'_!1�Q��g7_`7j BUS. PHONE: 7� (�,►"?O LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY:Im leis c jL`r 1 T�f� no WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? L k Iv - c�L n EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: F1� [Nk)a4'tPV'r I�IA?Pltt-� C[out(G4 � k Sal IZ I 11 Y/J -aT 4)W'l C 8 lL� OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: _ /Ja►vCi < CZ ' olILl0I HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? tots S IS THIS COMeANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLI S ONLY)? — PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: _A,3FtsJcyni ]) t*� ycwt btu i�l�\Z�fl� Ctc�tyt�atbt� i u ,r ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: 'f rc�'�ii�%P� 5�+fie a eLa �� A — „�w`>► �11�L C ]r���tl- .r. (11�1�Pr2— U �'l���r►�ct ��o�N��. c��n��i�►mtti� fat; �� 'S`rit�b►�nttw►��.e�►�S F1ud►.,�z I��Na�x�S a�S�C �ymi'�� rvS h��+.�Cc._S?�• �S `C . . �: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): h is BOARDS, COFSMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: �L�.o�i sJ(y1li►�J Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (1172W) t 13125 SN Hall Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (5Q3)639-4171 RE VE D OCT C11YOFTIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 NAME: TAtYTF;_'19ATTER C.STTTr -_- DATE: 10/11/87 ADDRESS (RES.): 9563 0,-W- Tnp? Tigard, OrPgnn 977711 RES. PHONE: _620_.7.53-2 ADDRESS (BUS.): P.Q. jjgx 23702Ti_2nrd,Oregon 97973 BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 1L yr-q SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Por land - EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: l � yrs ('.a4cndp College.., 5 yrs Plumbers Ap=rnnrirnchi= OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Tournagm.n Plumber-- 6v-s- Commercial Landscape A Irrigar on Onntrgrrnr 1% vPA HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?_y„G _- PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: _jJtt1P TPaRt,P - ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Rnnrd Member of Ist Church Cuz=ant m®mbor of OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COKtJITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Planning Comission Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (1172-) 131125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 IF Ci OF T�� CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION RD OREGON 25 Years of Service 1961-1986 NAME: 77 AosgQg02S/ DATE: ADDRESS (RES.) : 21,90 5w Sare,dw w!! . ?9dFa RES. PHONE: 439-3/3/ _ ADDRESS (BUS.): 9;.o Sw5/x A.►9. Pyd BUS. PHONE: 2 �-SFo66 _ LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 9 AO.S , SUGGESTED BY: _ WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? )I,LD SE A4#11 C,; Aa-vY4A& EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: .,vnl. Co/ E bNarr 08- OCCUPATIONAL ROCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROU D: AM�,,, IPE�ud� M/ri C:EA�� Raw HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? tilk Y9*A.5 .S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: Mon.Lc OTtGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: �•••• Soc��ryrs. o� s,w// I�Mwlsr47S -M��►Sd�e OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): � 1 G/OMM/l�L.rC Sear �._.�c*i G.9M M� �VR n/d 4 � GI BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: UAA4 W-rA401Jc4sE t Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO nside City Outside City (t172W) 13125 SW Hail Blvd,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 - (; 0 19871 Cirf TIG CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Service MRD 1961-1986 NAME: t-A � DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): �+� RES. PHONE: ,r ADDRESS (BUS.): ''Z'Y�A V Ci' oe- BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: �('� SUGGESTED BY: '"'�'� WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OC PATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: �S ,nfl HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? ' S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOVURR;PO AREA (N 0 APPLIC S ONLY)? _ PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: e� - � N ORGANIZATIONS AND OFF ES: P ,at �®qLexLf s OT INFORMATIO (GFI. REMAF S): 110 41 d11ej-PA..0 00"dfiz' XX k t r'. BOA2DS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: C 5 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrr.��r.�rr��rrrrrrr w. rrrrr rrrw r.��rrwwwwrrrrwrrrrrr {( Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed E Date Appointei Board, Committee, or NPO Inside Citv Outside City ( ,1172W) 13125 SW Hall Blvd,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 19871 (25 TY F TIG )RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION ®���®N Yeors of Sendce 9969-1986NAME: G�IOI Yti //11 � �)-amD /p — — �'�I ADDRESS (RES.): 1/(n SO �•�• ThHGcae ��`Gc �S RES. PHONE: Lv39-4pF7 ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: ? LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: //yrS SUGGESTED BY: , WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? /yj P f•?qty- ahvc� /J�� �' S �'� �` 7,:5 ur EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: �1iJ a's �t'h S �P�1 r t� Q�Pt' � a 9 Y__ OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: - �. -as1 �,. Sim ���-per /11 vPcfi< L �XZ,&, d 41Pw 47�'!�ajtLP� CHOid LOG I&VE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: O i-k n- Y-"ep ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): A V4 �'7�L/•76i¢C' o >� A Q !+u / w i�+.•. y� i-o/ 7`A C� p � /ac / e f- oz-� ce� BOARDS, COMMITTEES NPO—INTER-F$TED IN: -2)cl (!:FA l-ee.zc snc �P SPA �a�� Qa��c✓ �co�cde� /�s1 o��,�y /;f���s�e5� ,b��e W..; ��hoscq� P_ f uoe, c.c.��S se 4 b�:�e �a1/ak Date received at City Hall O— — Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO ( Inside Citv Outside City (1172W) 13125 SW Hall Blvd,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CITY 0 F TI . IMWW CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION OREGON 25 Years of Sendce 1969-9986 r NAME: i- DATE: ADDRESS (RES•): /i/3S S. W -7732,by 6k7 RES. PHONE: BUS. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): (,y�✓ LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: f¢�,�`,, `,- `-'L' ` SUGGESTED BY: 1 WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Sw ATL` EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGRO D: ROW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 1S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? ` PREVIOUS.COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: / i OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): } BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:r"_ E f Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Aapotnted Board, Committee, or NPO { nside City Outside City (1172W) 13125 SW Hail Blvd..P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 195; CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION ORSIGON 25 Years of Service Ty rr 1961-1986 NAME: ti ��c� DATE: _ ADDRESS (RES-): p . -1 R}sS. PH NE: .5th �.�!� �I ADDRESS (BUS.): + Igt A BUS.. PHONE: �1 b S-'W S AbAY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: o^ 8 WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: 06' r ` ` CJOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? Com, IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? No PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: �„ '• Q<<� ORGANI7.ATIONS AND OFFICES: n 1 OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS k �[�E -)L^u- J E',C1A :r 1 14 :(l CM z BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: r� _�]� -1- Date received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appotnted Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (1172W) L,41- c't 4� 0 f`' GF e�jLNr G CS 13125 SW Hall M.P.O.Sox 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CfTY®F TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: 5( IzA A. Wo '1 DATE: 5-116 7 1363� -� .4 RES. PHONE:— ADDRESS (RES.): ADDRESS (BUS.): '7-44o BUS. PHONE:b3`t-3(3`t L.ENCTH.OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: S SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: QJ S /1�• s ftn ( At-`i�L<i.,� S l�r+,�ers�lca OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: PJ wlc LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 4 r s IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (HPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? _-`"- PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: e.A t,J0-JA.'Ajo.) ��•�� �.s2�s� wa►� /�Av�aq rte. Cr�n►e►,c Q ¢.• ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: ( r p c- J � sYta- OTHER INFORMATION (GENE' AL REMARKS): t IL ..DS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: !i r��--� a•n F ---------- -------------------------- Date !deceived at City Hall Uate Interviewed Uatc Appointed Board. Ccmanittce. .►l NPO �! } Inside City Outside City _ (0346o) 4935_ SLJ K­161e f Vrrd Jure- C17Y F Tl� CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION L N en�ice 6 NAME: J. /�P�1ReLs DATE: m ADDRESS (RES- RES. PHONE: -3 ADDRESS (BUS.): ►5�- GaScc+1G YY3S �(, G,l�cnad! d�tf'-•2 STZI 7 BUS. PHONE: -02 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: y!. Z .w, SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Sri f;elel t1/4.- EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: d S o¢oG'a,; 5-1-6u ` :Q'`4•• y�%JerSi 7 OXf..r OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Coere-y' ese, <Uew')$ )$;-- Gatcs+ le-_ Irl'J�ouf�y oat -�D4j�9/' IAc-3 !'21e. eRSineer14 _!A t dtilt. HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: M G - 6�f' L C%A4 ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: , OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: 77-7777:7_77; Date received at City Hall � Y �ateInterviewed 4' Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (1172W) 13125 SW Hall Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 1987 DATE. SUBMITTED: October 13, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Utility easement PREVIOUS ACTION: None vacation request — Lots 4 and 5 of Amart Summerlake _ PREPARED BY: Development Services DEPT HEAD OKM� -, CITY ADMIN OK _ REQUESTED BY: Land Development Cons. POLI ISSUE Council initiated easement vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85--30. 1_NFORMATTON SUMMARY sm Land Development Consultants, who is representing a developer, is requesi:iny RM that the Council initiate vacation proceedings for a utility easement between Lots 4 and 5 of Amart Summerlake (see attached request ,and map) . Staff supports their request subject to a complc>te review which would include input from affected agencies. _.. ._.. . A14 'IVES CONSIDERED 1 . Appr•ovo the attached resolution calling for a public hearing on December' 7, 1987. 2. Take no action at this time. FISCAL IMPACT Approximately $300.00 for advertising and recording fees which will be paid by Land Development Consultants. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends alternative yl . cs/1349D t • J ■ Irk�■ ;►��►�aa �� � , MEN Nunn IN MEN xr EWAdu■■■�1r� . ' s, x .fin ��rt ONE ■■■■��I/_ 2 rr: ■ ■ _ 4 a gist ZVI gap MEN mm 555 SEEMS ow ti.�:.:� ,ter►';! = ' ��a� ■ ■►►►�zzz' � ��' '` f >} �► . , .��.� .+►� (IliiN ■A■■� yrs r , } ����t � ��.._r == 1111■ � -� `` ,,,` , 3 — -- T+ ' ■■■ oil BE Rim Manson ��� \1111■'�� .. ,11r1� ■ ■ � �t 4 � 'r °^ ,'e + �.5 �' i� Y x4t ` �1 � l� f" .. � k .::'ty d:t yi �� �� f� r�.+ 3 � �� t •1^ Ji a.. u...orf.�.�J...�� Y.r.l .. ... r .� ..._ � ._.., ..+�• .�: _.�.' ..,L _�._.....f..r. . .., ... . jr � w .., .._es ><:'.e r�'.S. ..., �:..i.t L A N D D E V E L 0 P H E N T C O N S U L T A N T S 209 N. E. Lincoln Ave. , Suite "B" Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 ( 503) 648-4061 Bob Oquist, PLS George Wilhelm , PE Ryan O'Brien, Planner Joe Thompson, Project Mgr. September 21 , 1987 Randy Clarno Development Services Manager City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard , Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clarno, The purpose of this letter is to request that the City of Tigard City Council initiate vacation of a 10 foot wide utility easement located between lots 4 and 5 of the Amart Summer Lake Subdivision. The reasons for this are the fact that complying with ORS 271 regarding filing a petition to the City of Tigard for all properties within 200 feet and 400 feet of the easement would be practically impossible. Secondly, this easement is necessary to allow for the permitted side yard set back of 4 feet within the Amart Summer Lake Subdivision. In conclusion, this easement is necessary to allow for potential lot line adjustments of the subject property. Please submit this request to the City Council for their September 28th meeting for Initiation of vacating the easement. If you have any questions or need further information, please give me a call . Sincerely, } r Ryan O'Brien wp7.morisset. 440 T p� jf [i F T EXHIBIT "A" A ten foot wide strip of land located in the northeast quarter of West. Willamette Meridian, Section 33, Township 1 South, Range 1 County, Oregon, the centerline of which City of Tigard, Washington is described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 4, Amart Summv.r Lake, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South 850 21' t to the point of terminus on the east 38" West, 112.65 feeG right—of--way line of SW summer Lake Drive. The sidelines of said tenfoot wide strip extend to the boundaries of Lots 4 and 5, said Amart Summer Lake, containing approximately 1126 square fek�t. cs/11347D i a' a�G,g'iE oto-L! FSAF vipR O ��� 'aj+5•'�jO� 1A ar sWit 2516 ` n ct2 F'Y Y. NOTICE OF AMART SUMMERLAKE (LOTS 4 and UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION REQUEST fi The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, December• 7, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. at the Tigard Civic center Town Hall Room, 13125, S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of public utility easements within lots 4 and 5, Amart Summerlake, a recorded plat, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. The subject vacation is to return to private ownership an easement which is no longer needed fur• utilities as currently aligned. The request- was initiated by the City Council on October 26, 1987 at the request of Land Development Consultants. Any interested person may appear• and be heard for• or against th^ proposed vacation of said lands. Any written objections or remonstrances shall be filed with the City Recorder by December• 7, 1987, by 7:30 p.m. TT Publish November 5, 12, 19, 26 and December 3, 1987 i t 1 o tt�®Rae li v o R O Q 04 OD =w O O N M N C, O Q M b O N ct gT.CZ lel vWC111 _ '.L of .09 ~ 4 Ulm � Qbi e rr ` e tap lli.1 sl.sp w Oto = Owl Oma = OO s O p .s 0 t- cli to_ '_" � coo r' OG Oww Lf ro :o `° t i8noo• Ys/ v •i=ems ,.. VA �,� .► •^/` s r g 07 N .e ��M Of ♦ * FqN OtD .sr 1�:> oLn 0" sn 0 in O l0 Oa adYS 0) O -- 4 s ��� f t a w 119.!4 4}a• 4S� td1 t• C, >d 7 O �• •..,, w ' N 2 .O i4,ti C M Cro CC �pL r-M N °! O a rl , J w o .apQ = Q. c in O N c p o g o g CO ' fa (K�) - a+I r. r «N CO N SILT 30 *3077 �OJ7 4>7 In A It'C���� M Q o p !4 -!,r ti 13A180 Cf) a 111 O uli9 ,ic Lc C,) �to � � � N i CC � 00, • t Q M d � a �� t n(� O � _~ �' Ct �{ Q tt!• � s1 / o *272 f7 A -Q rri' y � IC) O tia•it ~ 1F 1 ��+�tt!•,. „/� i O f•7lc f� 73 2t f E Cf 1=C �'r V sly, U, V OD �l ♦F s 1(( �,t�,`• rj aij Q N�y ^ ® r p �• g t M_~�yt f `Q_*0104 . Q tai►! f: uS �•Ji ('w t4 8 ti �V OODD '^4O N 07.72 as O O • 07 Ci•LZ '11'9 ►17i`- o W7 �� o al ~ N ►14.2, i• ? fn 1 O cD ( _ Ot V9 T „X i ti N iT `tr 0 �9yb N OCD ff` N �'•p~ m 0 s � 001 .4 C OD tp N - F toCD C%J Gt cz ti {�� ! _ r4 CID W t2t2i o•y>� GC'tO* �Pc %0 00 L2� fif2*. Cl CO }^yaM31 ....... ... .?! ..... JaAI� •�.�,� Q �m oaf n s Q O Q ' 0 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 13, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Utility vacation PREVIOUS ACTION: None request — lots 131 and 132 of Kne_ land ^' Estates No. 2 subdivision_ PREPARED BY: DevelopM ment Services DEPT HEAD OK '••1TY ADMT:N 01< REQUESTED BY: Ranier Bank, Ore on LICY ISSUE Council initiated easement vacation request — consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85--30. INFORMATION SUMMARY Rainier Bank of Oregon is requesting the City to initiate vacation proceedings for the vacati n ,� public. utility easemenL but:ween lots 131 and 132 of Kneeland Estates 1!v, 2 subdivision (see attached map and letter) . Staff supports the vacation request. _... ALl"ERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Approve the attached resolution calling for a t>ublic hearing on December i 7, 1987. t f i 2. Take no action at this time. FISCAL IMPACT 1 . Approximately $300 for advertising and recording fees to be paid by m Rainier Bank. yt SUGGESTED ACTION } staff- recommr3nds alternative H1 . cs/1361D f OEM l f fa } J Y.: ELM— SURE IIIIIIINIP og, soon ■■■■■■■t■ ■■� aaca■�� N. ����� MEN J'Y - Itlas©■ Exonsums fir. M� I� ■���■ ■��■ '■ SO ■� _ r� �►/ ■ter ■ SFlii 14 '� � mil ■ .■ ■ ■ :� ■ ��/ft1 �►� w �, � ■�■d ■ ■ _hair • ■�r►/ ::�,, �•— ■�� ■ INNEWOOFmoommumoommoommoomme �i■ .■ . -WhO ■!30■■ ■■■ Mal ■ Iltl'�® p�ti�tllllHlll■ ..� ;, IS no .�In cru •�■q�11M,� ��,♦r .'r j .ani ��� 111►� ♦ � �.�,: ■ �;tif ■ Igo" -,�+ �\\�, iii � � ` ���' ��'� �/11ti���� t► �� vie " MAN Err lilts r`...�l�� ` �.i1i11111tI��rJ��i� ��■O � , ����'i�llit :.`.���IIIl�11�■■� ■� .�1 .: � La� Err� Is i r Rainier Bank Oregon,N.A. 10250 SW Greenburg Road P.O. Box 23457 Portland,Oregon 97223-0070 (503) 245-1161 October 06, 1987 City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Att: Randy Clarno Dear Randy: As we have discussed, there is a utility easement still existing along both nidi sof the now Kneeland Estates VWait onbetween his easement lots 132 & 13ere was over looked when the easementsline were 'gr granted l ngdboth sides Further, new 5' utility of all new lot lines at the time the lot line adjustments were done. ent We, therefore request tovbeari�he costn of Ofsuch amvcgcationg the old lot line and agree However, we would ask for the City's consideration in assessing the costs if that is possible. As we have discussed, this is an in everyones best interest unfortunattthei vacation,on, buthere it swe must work through the to accomplishpublic bureaucratic system to accomplish our goals since this is proper ty. quest to be vacated can The easement we e, land being IO.00 feet in width described and 119.88 that certain parcel feet in length running parallel to and extending 5.00 feet on either side of lots 132 & 131, commoUl Wash Washington, State of line in Kneeland Estates II, in City of Tigard, County of Oregon. The easement should be granted on the basis that no utilities now exist within the easement; new `e tsl�em}a is have been granted along the new, adjusted lorlines; t cal ingress and easement as it now is, the lot has no pac egress or building pad. As indicated in our conversation, this lot was sold and ready to close, currently we are still working with o r buyersrk tying to hold them. Please allow me to do any g speed up the process. City of Tigard Page 2 A copy of a map indicating the easement to be vacated and letters from the utility companies are enclosed. S' cerely MM Aim is Assista t Vice Pr •ident RSC:kab Enclosures EXHIBIT "A" A ten foot wide strip of land .located in the northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette.. Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 132., Kneeland Estates II , a recorded plat-, Washington County Flat Records, thence South 36° 45' 46" East, 119.88 feet to the point of terminus on the nor•ther•ly right-of-way line of SW 93rd Avenue. The sidelines of said ten foot wide strip are parallel with and five feet from said center•l.ine and extend to the boundaries of Lets 131 and 132, said Kneeland Estates '11, containing approximately 1120 square feet. cs/1356D T TERED SIONAL URVEYOR TJT%'U G N FIGION #2252 IV "syQ' S/9 0ti $ •C 4b i % N �O go 9b G vkll ol CP I 10' L I T Y E M TA 6 9 ! dFr~ SCJ r 00 Cb Ltol / 4b2T 9 q do / baf,, r, L od `ti r?s fl Ale Of OP //3 \`p/ �` .f ///�r4• �e a S'pi1�� �/R�+i�bb �o �C ��� .411 ;�2 ;► ' �`� � + �+ .+V Quip �� `"Y Jill0 NOTICE OF KNEELAND ESTATES NO. 2 SUBDIVISION (LOTS 131 and 132) UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION REQUEST The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 7, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. at L-he Tigard Civic center l"own Nall Room, 13125, S.W. Nall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of public utility easements within lots 131 and 132, Kneeland Estates No. 2, a recorded plat, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. The subject vacation is to return to private ownership an easement which is no longer- needed for utilities as currently aligned. The request was initiated by the City Council on October 26, 1987 at the request of Rainier Bank of Oregon. Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said lands. Any written objections or remonstrances shall be filed with the City Recorder by December 7, 1987, by 7:30 p.m. TT Publish November 5, 12, 19, 26 and December 3, 1987 C l CITY OF T'IGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Oc tob,vr 20; 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October, 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Word Proc.essins PREVIOUS ACTION: .—Technician Position - OA III �.� PREPARED BY: Jill Monley, CS Director DEPT HEAD OIK��`CII"Y ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY: Jill Monley, CS Director POLICY ISSUE The position of Word Processing Technician was riot included in the 1987--88 Adopted Budget. In order tofill the position, Council approval is needed. In addition, Council must direct by resolution that contingency be appropriated to fund the newly approved position. _ ::: _............_._ ._. ......._..._....._.. .............._...__. __..__... . . INFORMA-TION SUMMARY Our Five-Year Plan does not provide for support. staff incr'ea•aes across the board in individual departments as technical and service staff are increased. Rather, the plan provides for certain common support functions to be provided on a centralized basis in order to provide consistent (ILality and increased production and turnaround on a city--wide: basis. The demand on existing WP staff has increased steadily over Lhe past six months. With organizational r•owLh and incre,aspd emphasis on customer sk?r•vi.ce that increaso will continue. In addition, maximum pr•oduk:Livity of the WP operation and all WP user's will improve with implementation of a telephone acck?ssod dictation system. This systom is particularly helpful to staff and Council mnmk)k?rs who may be located outside the Civic Center building because it is available 2.4 hours a day by any touch tone phone. rhe following funds would bo necessary to fund Lhe position out: of the Community Services Department for half a year: Salary and Benefits $ 8,800 Material and Services (includes one--time set-up) Word Processing Operator ] , 95 Phone Dictation Equipment 1,3395 Recruitment and Hiring Costs 200 Capital Outlay: Terminal and Related 3,700 Phone Dictation 4,450 $19,600 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the position requested and adopt a resolution to provide funding - $19,600. - 2. Approve the position but riot phone accessed centralized dictation equipment $13,755. 3 . Disapprove the position. FISCAL IMPACT General Fund Contingency will be reduced by $19,600 and appropriation in the Office ervices Section will be increased by $19,600. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative ##1 - approval of the position and related contingency appropriation. sb/1326D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF" THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL. AUTHORIZING THE POSITION OF OA III (W.P. TECH TIPJ THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND TRANSFERRING APPROPRIATIONS. WHEREAS, production in Word Processing has more than doubled in the last 12 months; and WHEREAS, Word Processing staff are finding it difficult to keep up with existing demand; and WHEREAS, it appears that. demand will continue to grow as the 5 Year Plan unfolds; and WHEREAS: Word Processing is a centralized function serving all departments of the City, therefore all departments are affected when production demand cannot- be nip.t; and WHEREAS, the 5--Year Plan does riot. provide fur increases in staff within individual depar-tments for typing and dictation production as needs increaso; and WHEREAS, production by Word Processing staff will increase with more use of transcription rather than hard copy; and WHEREAS, production by Word Processing users will increaser with use of tram>c.r:i.- tion rather than hard copy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section-1., The position of OA I:[I ( Word Processing Technician) and purchase of telephone accessed dictation equipment is authorized in the Community Services Department. Section 2: Contingency is to be appropriated as follows: Adopted Revision Revised General Fund Community Services $3,010,361 $ 19,600 $3,029,961 Other Programs 1,737,082 - 1,737,082 Contingency 1,094,757 ( 19,600) 1,0751157 Total General Fund $5,842,200 -O- $5,842,200 PASSED: This day of 1987• ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard City Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 87- Page 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder October 19, 1987 FROM; Sherrie Burbank, Office Services Mgr�� SUBJECT: Dictation Equipment As you know, six months ago Word Processing started transcribing Police interview/narrative tapes. Prior, to that time, transcription was very limited. Since July of 1987, we have also been transcribing various other short memos to minutes. Once the operators have performed this tapes from task several times and have become mur•e experienced in transcription work, ing both production time will idecrew>m'cumK�arc�cial:or20,'wE>mE'fudr macliineof atrans�ription. longhand and shorthand F it save the transcriptionist time, it sav(�s the document Not only does producer time. The averag(� speed of producing a document in longhand is 10 wpm, shorthand is 20 wpm, and machine dictation is 75 wpm. 1"o further ,lecutive`an dhlsecr secretary provided producing 3 r�letters per day forsa to�talof basis450 woof �rdFs an t k.Xl l_onyhancl Shorthand Mach i ne. 22.5 min. 6.0 min. Dictate (Executive) 45.0 min. yy 5 min. -- Shorthand (Secretary) 30.0 min. ?_2.5 min. Transcription 30.0 min. As you can see from these figures, the secretary would gain 30 minutes per day through use of machine dictation while an executive could gain either 16.5 minutes per day over the shorthand method and 46.5 minutes per day over the longhand method. After initial training of staff and fine—turfing of support staff providing transcribing services, use of dictation equipment would be more cost- effective for the City and staff. Dictation equipment would support City needs as they are currently projected in the Five—Year Plan plus it would maximize operator/dictator productivity. There are two options available to the City regarding the purchase of dictation equipment: (1) expansion of our current handheld recorders; or (2) purchase of a centralized network. There are pros and cons to both options which need to be addressed. Handheld Pros Cons Compatibility w/ current equipment Theft Initial cost per unit Durability of cassettes & equipment Compactness No built--in security One user per machine Centralized Pros Cons Compatibility w/ current equipment Initial cost Durability of cassettes & equipment Size (can't be moved frequently) Built—in security measures Message taking capabilities Telephone access for outside users Accessibility Usability If we were to purchase 25 handheld micro cassettes exluding the cassettes themselves to be used by staff (managers, Council members, etc.), we would be spending approximately thc: same amount as we would on a centralized unit. 1'n addition, we would be less centralized so there would be the need to purchase addition transcription equipment to meet the needs of staff. Recommendation ! Its I recommend that we invest money in the centralized network in or-der, to make staff resources ae and maximize productivity . Th better use of limited centralized network would allow more flexibility to the City in that all parties (including those stationed outside City Hall) would have easy access for dictating purposes either during office hour's or after hours. sb/1320D t i } 3 t t 7 i A A b q gi} !u S C S A t4 1 E c i t CITY OF TI:GARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 15 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Request for City PREVIOUS ACTION: None to assist; with accessing public right;__ of-way -- Don Morissette Builder PREPARED BY: Development Services Mgr' �, REQUESTED BY: Don Morissette Builders DEPT READ OK ,t yr-CITY ADMIN OK RE Q , L.TCY ISSUE Should the City assist: developers with overcoming a timing related obstacle created by another governmental agencies process. INFORMATI.ON SUMMARY Don Morissette Builders is requesting the City to assist them with accessing SW Winterlake Drive and SW Falcon Ripe Drive from the cast (see attached letter and map) . Access is currently restricted by a 40 foot wide strip of land which is known ai, SW 130t.h Avenue but is not: a public right--of-way. 1.A, should be noted that SW Falcon Rise Drive will be oxtended to thea west line of SW 130th Avenue as required by a previous land use approval . This 40 foot strip currently has an "unknown owner" status (county designation) and is in the process of Country LAx foreclosure. Until this process is complote, approximately two years, the property cannot be conventionally Lransferr•ed Lu either public or private control . It tAPPOa.r•s the only mei::hud by which access ME could be gained is for the City to condemn a portion of the 40 foot strip of am lama adjacent to SW Winterlake Drive z+nd SW falcon Rise Driver. The City 'am Atic�rney has been consulted .in the matter and suggests that condemnation may be the only immediate solution. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Agree to initiate condemnation proceedings once Dori Morissette Builders, approval that requires street connections Inc. have received a land-use to SW Falcon Rise Drive and SW Winterlake Drive. 2. Require Don Morissette Builders and any other potential developer to wait: the required two years until the property is free and clear and conventional transfer can occur. 3. Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT Don Morissette Builders have proposed to pay all cost associated with the condemnation. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff would suggest Alternative No. 1 provided all legal requirements could be met. sb/1388D A'T MRNEYS AT LAW October 14, 1987 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Randy Clarno OCT City of Tigard 1 ��87 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Condemnation of Portion of 130th Avenue Dear Mr . Clarno: Imm own This office represents Don Morissette Builders, Inc. with respect to that portion of Tax Lot 4200, lSl-33DC in the City of Tigard known as 130th Avenue. Pursuant to previous conversations, this letter is to request that the City initiate condemnation proceedings to condemn two portions of the above Tax Lot necessary to A7.1'ORNF:YSextend the F1 ' right of way of Southwest winterlake (.F:11'l6 R.IIAMSTON ARTIIt-R L.TAR1.OW Drive and ti..: 50' right of way of Southwest Falcon Rise E.ANDREW JORDAN ROY R.n10MP!i)N Drive as shown by maps previously submitted y Ryan W ILLI AM IL CAFF'EE RANDOLnIJ.S'TEVF.NC O'Brien with respect to this matter. In the event that JOHN IL BAKER the 43 acres located at Tax Lot 1.00, Map 1S1-33DD is OF COUNSEL RALPIIBOLLH:ER developed, as my client intends, it would a necessary LEGALASWI'ANTS to have at least two exits to the property. Currently, JANET G.ANDFRSON BARBARA S.KELLY only 128th Avenue is available as access to that VIVIAN T.LENTZ MARILYN E.PRESTON property. GLORIA S.ROUSE MARY CAROL.SCHNELI. ETIIF.LVNSPROUL Based upon the above, we request that the City begin ANGELA M.SULLIVAN condemnation proceedings immediately with respect to LFW-VREWC.FLLIICKOR the right of way necessary to make the two connections across the undedicated 130th Avenue and that the matter be placed upon the Council agenda as soon as possible. As indicated previously, my client will be willing to pay the costs associated with condemnation. Thank you for your assistance. Y urs very truly, BO IG MPTON & RLOW 1500 S.W.CEDAR LIILI_S BLVD. SUrM102 E. ANDRE ORDAN PORI•LA.ND,OREGON 97275 TELEPHONE("3)641 "3)W I-71'71 FACSIMLLELS07)5{I.299I EAJ/BF/1038G-2 cc: Mr. Ryan O'Brien Mr. Don Mcrissette E r • u. 4 1 r . a t ■ 1W I „ T �tea■ ■■ w`'�a■ :�Ip = � � �� r ■ N� Vti is AIR W01 UI NMI k " -11' , s — 4�.. ■ ``��•��• � •r. t 'dby/� / ■ ■ ■otoll amOman T4. , ` „■ � ci���n "mss';�' �{�' F URE UT miss maw Smog By AMR NINE 41r#41 OMEN am ow all own ILAW mass will so MERIN f. >3�' � !� /lily �"�' Er+ !/1��:"r+"� it, � � • • y. s ��, *����■ lel■ ■■■■■■ ■! t .. .■■ ■t � ., �� � ,�� - '� �i1 111■ " O'DONNELL, RAMIS, ELLIOTT & CREW MARK P.O'DONNELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW CANBY OFFICE TIMOTHY V. . ELLIOTTBALLOW & WRIGHT BUILDING IBI N.GRANT,SUITE 202 13 KENNETH M. ELLICAN BV.OREGON 97013 STEPHEN•F.CREW 1727 N.W.HOYT STREET IS031 266-1149 CHARLES E.CORRIGAN• PORTLAND.OREGON 97209 KENNETH H FOX 15031222-4402 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT JEFF BACHRACH MARGARET C. HAND STEPHANV WATSON PLEASE REPLY TO PORTLAND OFFICE SHARON L.WILLIAMS MICHAEL REDDEN Or COUNSEL •ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN STATE OF WASHINGTON i DATE: October 19, 1987 i TO: Tigard City Council i FROM: City Attorney RE: Authority to Condemn Our office has reviewed the request for exercise of city condemna- tion authority which is on the agenda for tonight's meeting. We are satisfied that Council has authority to undertake the requested action. To the extent that we would be condemning only land to be used for public right-of-way, we would satisfy the public purpose doctrine }}} which limits the use of condemnation authority. I have further recommended to the staff that all expenses of condemnation, including staff time, legal costs and condemnation award costs, should be borne by the developer. TVR:mch 10/19/87 C MEMORANDUM , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator October 16, 1987 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Undergrounding of Utility Lines the Planning Section has inquired concerning the cost and At your request, feasibility of und erg round i rig utility lines along Pacific Highway. Duane Roberts Iias discussed the results in the attached memo. The results are mixed: some of the objectives can be met, however, thV cost is quite high. :Lt appoars that the complete under-grounding of lines is not possible. The cost of undergrounding conservatively i:: $8 million. Duane' s meow breaks this figure down further by the road segment•; which yc�u r4tquest.ed. a.nformation on the brer,+kout of costs to customers is also included in the memo. Obviously, the cost per customer is a concern as well as the spreading of thc� cost to all consumers. Public reaction to such a major undertaking, with the cost passed on to all customers similar i:o an LTD, must bo carefully ( evaluated. We also just received new information (copy attached) from PGE which indicates that a cost: of $281 per foot was recently arrived at for a similar project in Lake Oswego. We believe that the $300 per foot figure is realistic. please advise me if you require further work on this project. br•/12.91D w i October 15, 1987 Duane Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd PO Box 23397 Tigard OR 97223 Underground Conversion Costs Fecently you asked as for a cost estimate to underground PGL; facilities along Highway 99 in Tigard and we quoted you an approximate $250.OU cost per foot based upon an estimate for a similar request along SE 82nd Avenue in Portland. Last year the City of Lake Oswego also asked for a conversion cost as part of their proposed improvement of S. State Street and at that time we gave l them a detailed estimate for this work. Numbers from this estimate (cover letter enclosed) detailed below would be, in my opinion, representative of the costs associated with any conversion along Highway 99. One major difference, however, would be that the poles along Highway 99 would remain in order to retain our transmission circuit. The conversion costs for undergrounding PGE facilities along S. State Street in Lake Oswego were: Total number of poles: 45 Length of conversion: 8,190 feet or 1.55 miles Net remaining book cost, less salvage, plus removal cost $ 22,404 Associated overhead* 31,111 Cost to install vaults, covers, duct system and conduit** 1,797,194 Cost to install underground primary conductors, switches and transformers 452,890 Total $2,303,599 or $281 per foot * Associated overhead included six poles and anchors to facilitate the conversion. ** Includes 8,190 feet of duct system encased in concrete and restoration of blacktop at $100 per foot, 20 electric vaults, 18 transformer pads and 4,000 feet of 4—inch PVC. Western Division-14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road—Beaverton,Oregon 97007-643-5454 Duane Roberts October 15, 1987 Page 2 I am also enclosing a quote from Bones Construction for installing a duct bank (2 - 6-inch PVC, 2 - 4-inch PVC and 1 2-inch PVC) and a switching l vault for PGE this year along Murray Road. Based upon Bones' quote, the cost per foot was approximately $47.001 including the cost of the vault. This quote assumed trenching in native soil and no restoration work other 4 than rough backfill. Please call me if I can be of further assistance. 7 's Sincerely, r rats t o n Service and Design Supervisor i Western Region 643-5454, Ext 354 JJ/sa8.1B16 Enclosures C 3508 S.W.209th • Aloha,Oregon 97007-1028 • 649.5682 February 25, 1987 Forti'and General Electric 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road Beaverton, OR 97007 ATTENTION:. Sanford Re: Murray Hill Conduit Installation Dear Sanford: At your request I am sending you a price quote for the installation of underground vaults and conduit along approximately 120' of PGE frontage on Murray Road. . These prices are based on the assumption that we would install the conduits at the•same time that we do the trenching and installation of the GTE conduits under our contract with Columbia-Willamette. Our prices are as follows: 1 . Trench excavation and backfill $0.92/lf. of trench 2. Furnish and Install 2 - 6" PUC, Sch. 40 Conduits $4.10/lf. of pipe 3. Furnish and Install 2 - 4" PUC, Sch. 40 Conduits $2,43/lf. of pipe 4. Furnish and Install 1 - 2" PUC, $1.36/lf. of pipe Sch. 40 Conduits 5. Furnish and Install one underground $3,750.00 each vault (15106) Please sena a purchase order or contract as soon as possible. We are about to begin installation of the GTE conduit and would like to know for sure if you want us to install your conduit at the same time. Sincerely, David Shetler r ,c/dId INTER-OFFICE C0A1MU-N1UA:1'i0 1N PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Dau March 19, 1986 To Bob Blakeney From Don KrichbaumV(�' Subject Cost to convert overhead facilities to underground for City of Lake Osweso. COST TO rREMOvE EXISTING FACILITIES Cost to remove 45 distribution poles , primary and secondary conductor. Net Remaining book Cost $ 3' 359 . 58) 9 - 84 Less Salvage X21 ,520. 00 - Removal Cost $ 22 ,404 . 26 Associated Overhead $ 31,111 . 2£ Cost to install vaults, covers , duct system and conduit . �1,797 ,19� . 4li Cost to install underground primary, switches, cut-outs , transformers and 452, 890 - 74 lightning arrestors. Job was priced based on estimated years not on actual years or figures . *Includes Contingency a i t t � a i vn�c MEMORANDUM OWN CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Bill Monahan October 9, 1987 s FROM: Duane Roberts SUBJECT; Cost Estimates for Under-grounding Utility Lines Along Pacific Highway. This memo focuses on the estimated cost and cost per month per- customer of converting existing overhead utility lines to underground services alone Pacific Highway. Costs are computed for three different portions of Pacific ity limits, Hall to Bull Mountain Road, Highway: East city limits to west c and Hall to Walnut Street. The memo was prepared .in response to a r'0quest for information by tho City Administrator. Interviews conducted with engineering officials of the four utility districts and one state agency that own overhead lines located within these portions of Pacific Highway were theprimary data sources. The officials were: Jim Johnson, PGE Service and Design Cons-it.ant Supervisor; Jim Ryan, PGE Service and Design Consultant; Bob Olson, G'1L Irig ineer•; Georgette Garcia, PN13 Engineering Manager; Frank Stone, Willamette Cable Construction Supervisor; Alan Troyer-, ODOr Region Traffic Signal Manager; Lee Gunderson, ODOT Assistant District Maintenance Supervisor. The City Accounting Manager prepared the s cost: per customer- estimates. It is important to point out that none of the officials consulted were asked to do any fieldwork. Many emphasised the practical difficulty of arriving at cost estimates for the retrofitting of existing services through developed lands without careful fieldwork and analysis. As such, the various estimates arrived at represent only ballpark statements. As indicated later, better estimates could be requested if so desired. Y. EXISTING CONDITIONS r K Observation shows that utility poles are situated along 100% of the north side and 80% of the south side of the full 20,800 feet length of Pacific Highway as it passes through Tigard. The number of wires strung on the north side varies from 10 to 11. These consist of transmission, distribution, and secondary r power lines; traffic signal cable; television cable; and some 4,200 feet of telephone cable. The poles on the southern side of the road are owned by GTE and PNB and carry telephone cable only. PGE In discussing the power lines, an important point is that the transmission cable located on top of the pole is ca high tension, 57,000 volt line. i 4 According to PGE, this line is riot capable of being placed underground without insulation capable of withstanding high voltages. One means of meeting this requirement is by placing the line inside a conduit containing a circulating oil bath. Due to lack of a compelling need thus far, PGE has no experience upon which to evaluate the cost or feasibility of converting a transmission line using this or- any other possible method. For this reason, the cost of under-grounding this line is not included in the estimates given in this memo arid, unless proven otherwise, it appears that this line and the poles that it is fastened to could riot be taken down as part of a conversion from overhead to underground. A related issue is that a 1984 PUC rule (84-737) prohibits districts from requiring the conversion of lines in excess of 35,000 volts (sea attached). Since the PGE line exceeds this voltage, the City could not legally require that it be placed underground. PGE' s other- power lines, i.e. , their distribution and secondary lines, are both capable of conversion. "fhe placemo nt of two six--inch diameter conduits and a vault would be needed in order to accomplish this work. Construction costa and issues related to the retrofitting of power, and other aerial lines include the following: Sidewalk Removal : The public ROW along 99W is 8 feet from the curb. "the sidewalk on the north side of the highway is mostly 5 feet in width and c�xLends from the east city limits to Gfaar•de.. Street. According to Mr. Ryan of PGE, except for road crossings and a few places where the sidewalk is 8 feet: .in width, the sidewalk along 99W would not have to be removed in order- to dig the size trench needed to �+cr.ommodat:e all existirig utiIiticas lines . ( Road Crossings: the removal of hard surface that. would be necessary includes the cutting or, boring of a multitude of road and sidewalk crossings . During is prohibitively expensive. Highway Department permission would be roquire.d to tear up the street. Cutting or boring would also be required on private property for converting the aerial drops running from the road into each business or residence. Transformer Sitting: Another consequence of the elimination of the aerial drops is that the transformer, which converts current- to a lower voltage and is installed on the pole in an aerial system, would have to be replaced by a pad mounted transformer at each business or residence. In the case of a business, if no island or other site were available for the placement of the transformer-, it would have to be placed in a parking area. If so placed, a transformer and associated barrier posts would take up approximately one parking place. Tenant Improvements: Each business and residence located adjacent to 99W also would require certain other internal and external improvements, such as moving the meter base and a greater or lesser amount of rewiring to meet current code, in order to connect to an underground system. Based on the 82nd Avenue study, the cost per business would range from $300 - $1,500. These costs would not be changed back to the ratepayers as a whole. They are considered as tenant improvements and, as such, would be a direct cost to the property owner. Significantly, no financing is available for the owner's expense of converting. The derivation of a construction cost estimate for converting power lines and appertenances to underground services is based on a large study of similar facilities along 82nd Avenue in Portland. The estimate for 82nd was $400 per foot total cost for PGE lines. Because of fewer circuits and less development, Mr. Johnson revises this figure downward to $300 per foot for 99W. If this figure is correct, the total conversion cost for• the 20,800 feet of overhead cable contiguous to 99W in Tigard is $6,240,000, not including the main transmission line. These costs would appear• to be consistent with an estimated cost of $175 per foot as of 1975 (see attached) . GTE GTE owns poles along approximately 75% of the roadway under discussion. As mentioned, these are situated on the south side of the highway. GTE estimates the cost of converting to underground services at $1 .3 to $1 .5 million. The cost would go down somewhat to $1 . 1 to $1 .3 million if the GTE lines were to be laid in a shared trench with PGE on the northern side of the highway. PNB PNB owns 1, 100 feet: of acer.ial facilities extending from east city limits to 72nd Avenue. The estimated cost of conversion is roughly $75,000. WILLAMET-TE. CABLE Willamette Cable owns trunk and distribution lines stretched along the length of 99W through Tigard. The estimated cost of undergrounding these lines, including t:he cost of constructing pedestal amplification stations every 190 feet, is $12.50 per foot or $300,000 total cost. OREGON HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT The cost of traffic signal undcergruundirig, including the installation of a junction box every 190 feet, is calculated to be in the $250,000 range. As with the GTE estimates, the PNB, Willamette, and ODOT esLimates would go down a considerable amount through the use of a common trench. COST ESTIMATES The sum of the individual, per foot retrofitting rough estimates given above gives an overall, full route cost estimate in the neighborhood of $8 million. The reduced cost for removing the 10,000 feet of aerial cable between Hall and Bull Mountain is $3.8 million. The cost of removing the 4,400 feet of aerial cable between Hall and Walnut is $1 .6 million. These amounts would remove the telephone poles and lines stretching along the south side of 99W. They also would remove the crossarms and most of the overhead lines attached to the poles along the north side of the highway, but would not remove the poles themselves nor the high voltage line strung on top of the poles. The tentative per customer costs associated with these estimates were computed based on 20 and 30 year reimbursement periods and a uniform percentage of monthly bill surcharge. These parameters are consistent with PUC guidelines IM relative to the manner and timing of cost recovery. These state that conversion costs shall be repaid in a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 30 years, and, except as described in "A" (4), shall be calculated based on a to all customers located within the boundaries of uniform percentage applied ease of calculation, a fixed customer base of the local government. Fease 11,900 (10,500 residences and 1,400 businesses) and a 10% interest rate were assumed. A growing customer base of course would reduce proportionally the per customer figures shown, as would a lower interest rate. Also assumed is that the City orders the utilities to convert their facilities at the utilities expense, and that all the costs of conversion are incorporated into one billing system (PGE:'s) . IMPACT ON AVERAGE RATEPAYER Highway 99 through City: $8,025,000 WMam --L)-0,90-0- band sale+ costs $39.50 per' customer my= 8, 115,000 at l0Y 2.0 year's fur, each 6 months $8,025,000 _ 90000 at 10`X, 30 years $36.00/ 6 months 8, 115,000 ( Hall to Bull Mountain Road: $3,840,000 _ 70,000 3,910,000 at 10% 20 years $19.00/6 months $3,840,000 70,000 3,910,000 at 10% 30 years $17.50/6 months Hall to Walnut: $1,670,000 50,000 1,720,000 at 10% 20 years $8.50/6 months $1,670,000 50,000 1,720,000 at 10% 30 years $7.50/6 months t IN CONCLUSION It goes without saying that these estimates are all very speculative. Careful fieldwork and analysis would provide more accurate estimatez If better preliminary information is required, staff will attempt to provide it within his ability. To provide highly detailed estimates and to verify information provided by the utilities, it: may bo necessary to hire a consultant with special knowledge of this subject. cs/1248D i i s i t i 1 ORDER NO.84 - 737 ENTERED SEP i tiddLk 18 1984 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONER OF O?EGON R 69 In the Matter of the Petition of ) CORRECTING PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ) for adoption of a proposed rule ) ORDER relating to the conversion of ) utility facilities. ) In Order No. 84-615 the Commissioner adopted ' OAR 860-22-046 relating to the conversion of utility facilities. Page 6 of Appendix "A" to Order No. 84-615 discusses a section of the rule permitting local govern- ments to direct the utility to collect conversion costs from only a portion of the customers located within the local government' s boundaries. That section was inadver- tently omitted from the rule adopted by Order No. 84-615. (The omitted portion is underscored in Appendix "A" to this order. ) The purpose of this order is to correct the mistake. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the corrections to O;:R 660-22-046 set forth in Appendix "A" are adopted. IT IS _URT= OrDEF.ED that a certified copy of this order and the corrections to OAR 860-22-046 be filed with the Secretary of State. Made, entered, and effective , �� O co `��!\ GENE MAUDLIN Public Utility Commissioner ;dg/0206A +` ORDER NO. 84 - 737 (d) "Local government" includes cities; counties; authorities and agencies created pursuant to ORS Chapters 456 and 457; special districts of the type described in ORS 198.010, 198. 180; and all other political subdivisions of the state. (e) Overhead electric or communication facili- ties" means electric or communication facilities located above the surface of the ground. (F) "Overhead retirement cost" means the original cost, less depreciation, less salvage value, plus removal costs, of existing overhead distribution facilities no longer used or useful by reason of the conversion. (g) Underground electric or communication facili- ties" means electric or communication facilities located below the surface of the ground exclusive of those facilities such as substations, transformers, pull box3s, service terminals, pedestal terminals, splice closures, apparatus cabinets and similar facilities which normally are above the surface in areas where utility facilities are underground in accordance with standard underground ,,ractices. (h) "Utility" means any electric or communication ( utility described by ORS 757 . 005. (2 ) This rule does not apply if the total conversion cost incurred by the utility during one calendar year does not exceed five-one hundredths of one percent ( .05%) of the utility' s annual revenues derived from customers residing within the boundaries of the local government. (3 ) When a local government requires a utility. to convert electric or communications facilities at the utility' s expense, the utility shall collect the conversion costs from customers located within the boundaries of the local government. (4-) The local government may direct the utility to VOO collet conversion costs from only a nortion of the customers located within the boundaries of the local government. (5) Conversion costs incurred by the utility shall be accumulated in a separate account in the utility' s books. Interest shall accrue from the date the utility incurs the cost. The rate of such interest shall be ecual to the effec- tive cost of the senior security issue which most recently preceded the incurrence of the cost. (6 Z The utility shall collect the conversion costs and interest over a reasonable period of time subject to approval by the Commissioner. Ho-Wever, the pay-back period P.nnendix "F" ?age 2 of 3 ORDER NO-8 4 — 7. shall not exceed the depreciable life of the facilities. Collection shall begin as soon as practical after the end of the year in which the conversion costs are incurred. (7) The conversion cost to be recovered from each customer shall be calculated by applying a uniform percentage to each customer' s total monthly bill for service rendered within the boundaries of the local government. The amount collected shall be separately stated and identified on each bill. (8) This rule applies to conversions upon which construction is commenced on or after August 13, 1984. r alm/0685o-11 Appendix "A" Rage 3 of 3 ORDER NO-84 shall not exceed the depreciable life of the facilities. Collection shall begin as soon as practical after the end of the year in which the conversion costs are incurred. 7) The conversion.cost to be recovered from each customer shall be calculated by applying a uniform percentage to each customer' s total monthly bill for service rendered s within the bounuz ,,ies of the local government. The amount collected shall be separately stated and identified on each bill. C 9 This rule applies to conversions upon which construction is commenced on or after August 13, 1984. E Sk • i i 1 C . 3 { {t R S F e x alr/0685o-11 p Appendix "A" Page 3 of 3 RECENED MAIN - 3 1975 Portland General Electric Company CITY OF TIGARD WESTERN DIVISION 14655 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD BEAVERTON.OREGON 97005 643.5454 February 26, 1975 f 1 i r Mr. Wilbur Bishop, Mayor City of Tigard P. O. Box 23557 Tigard, OR 97223 i 1 Dear Mr. Bishop: 1 I recently saw Bruce Clark at the City Hall and he mentioned you had expressed interesi in undergrounding overhead power lines, particularly along the route of P2.cific Highway as it passes through the City. i You are probably aware that when new residential subdivisions and � established, our distribution systems are almost apartment complexes are d. King is a prime example. This has been always placed undergrouns not too difficult to accomplish as the going on for several years, and it areas are new and rarely have any developed overhead distribution. I appreciate your desire for seeking improved appearances in the City and commend you for it. However on conversions it is a much more complicated and costly matter. About three years or so back the Tigard City Council expressed the same idea and inquired about practicability of converting the existing line which carries both transmission and distri- bution voltages plus the service laterals from overhead to underground. A meeting was held with the Council and the determination was made that proceeding with such a program was just too vast an undertaking. A basic estimate at this time reveals a cost in the neighborhood of $175. 00 per foot. One 300' span would amount to $52, 500. 00 and a factor that would add to the $175. 00 per foot estimate is the customer's expense of connect.converting his internal and external wiring to accommodate anunderground the businesses and residences along the highway presently have overhead services. It would da for necessary the c nversion work he Company would have underground co a Mr. Wilbur Bishop, Mayor February 26, 1975 Page 2 the problem of providing continuity of service. Some commercial customers would also have to change their service from 120/240, 3 p, 4-wire Delta to another voltage and alter their equipment due to the possibility of trans- former resonance problems in larger amperage panels. Briefly that is the situation. If the costs sound monumental to you you're right, they are. I do want you aware however that as a Company we wish to cooperate with the City in the development of the City's growth aims, within the context of practical applications. :truly)Dours Ver / Pete Perrir.e Marketing Department tm C: Messrs: Bruce Clark, Administrator Don Shattuck, Division Manager, Western Division, P. G. E. Co. Li CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMNiARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITF•ED: October 16, 1987 } ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Action Area PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearings on Overlay CPA 87-03, ZOA, 87--09, and b_ePtember 21 and October- 12 ZC 87-16 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPT HEAD OK ^4rr'm-1 CI1 Y ADMEN OK REQUESTED BY: City Council POLICY ISSUE Should the City adopt policies and requirements to implement the Action Area Overlay? Should the CBD area be designated as an Action Area? INFORMATION SUMMARY On September 2.1, 1987 the City Council reviewed the proposed Action Areas concept. After considering input from the Planniny Commission and NPO Itl, Council directed staff to revise the standards for administering the ordinance. The revised standards were reviewed by NPO H1 and the Planning Commission and their sugyestions were presonted to City Council at a public hearing on October 12, 1987, At that, mooting Council directed staff to revise the standards proposed in Chapter 18.86. Attachod is an or•dinancr_ which, it' approved, would adopt Chapter 18.86 with Council's suggested revisions. Also attached are ordinances amending the Comprehensive Plan and designating the CBD as an Action Area. _.........-..........._ ....... ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the ordinances attached. 2. Recommend further revisions to the attached ordinances. 3 . Tako no action. FISCAL IMPACT None. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinances . sb/1403D z CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 10/26/87 — DATE SUBMITTED: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 'Disposal of v_ PREVIOUS ACTION: Surplus Real Property. for SW 68th _.. Map P Parkway LID No. 35 _ PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooled _.. DEPT HEAD OK' - r-NV CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY: titr-- OL_ICY ISSUE Shall the City dispose of real property which is surplus as a result of tho SW 68th Parkway LID No. 357 INFORMATION SUMMARY The City acquired certain parcels of real property in connection with the project known as SW 68th Parkway L.ID No. 35 and the plat of Way 1._oe- When property was acquired for the LID, it was undcr•stood that surplus property would be conveyed to the owners of c+djoining properties. The <At:tdchOd 11101110 explains the variou!. remnant properties to be conveyed. AL TERNAT IVIS CON;IDLRE D 1 . By motion, authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to dispose of parcels 1 through 3, Tract A, and Tract B, all in accordance with the recommendations of the attached memorandum. 2. Retain the properties in City ownership. FISCAL IMPACT None. The property values were already recognized in calculating payments due to the various property owners for property deeded to the City as right—of—way for 68th Parkway. —i SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative #1. br/1314D MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and Council �/ October 16, 1987 FROM: Randall R. Wooley !"91 SUBJECT: Surplus Property from SW 68th Parkway l_IU No. 35 Local Improvement District No. 35 was formed in June of 1983 for the purpose of constructing SW 68th Parkway street and utilities improvements betweon Haines Street and pacific Highway. In 1985 the various property owners deeded to the City the property needed for the street right-of-way. The alignment of the stroot left three small unusable remainder parcels identified on the attached map (Exhibit A) as parcols No. 1 , 1, and 3 . These parcels were also deodod to the City. It was undorsLood by the proporty owners that these remi.Ainder parcels would bu conveyed to the ownors of adjoining properties upon completion of Lhe project-. Conveyance of these parcels was calculated as a portion of the value received by oach property owner for proporty deedod to the City. It was also anticipated that, upon completion of the project, the city would relinquish all interest- in the portion of SW 69th Avenue which was platted in 1975 as part of a subdivision and is no longer needed under the new 68th Parkway street alignment. This property is shown on Exhibit: A as "Tract A", "Tract B", and "right--of--wrAy to be vacated" . As shown on Exhibit B, Tracts A and B are reserve strips intended to prevent access from adjoining properties until the street was extended in conformance with City standards . Because the street was extended on the new alignment- of 68th Parkway, the reserve strips are no longer, needed. Parcels 1--3 and Tracts A and B appear to qualify as Special Case Properties under the procedures for disposal of surplus real property adopted by Ordinance 87-48. Special Case Properties are defined as parcels that were acquired by thn City for capital improvements and were purchased subject to an agreement for the manner in which any surplus would be disposed . There was a verbal agreement between the City and the property owners in 1985 regarding disposal of these parcels. That agreement was reflected in the calculations determining the fair market value to be paid each property owner for property deeded to the City. Ordinance 87-48 provides that if the Council determines that the agreement is valid, the property shall be disposed of pursuant to the agreement' s terms. Based on my review of the files and discussions with the engineering consultant, I feel confident that a valid verbal agreement did exist in 1985. Therefore, 1 recommend that the parcels be conveyed to the owners of adjoining properties. More specifically, I recommend that the Mayor and City Recorder be. authorized to convey certain surplus parcels of real property as follows: 1 . Parcel No. 1 as described in attached Exhibit C to be conveyed to Oregon Education Association, an Oregon nonprofit corporation. 2. Parcel No. 2 as described in attached Exhibit D to be conveyed to Raymond A. Feichtmeir and Frank M. Warren, Jr *A 3. Parcel No. 3 as described in attached Exhibit E to be conveyed to Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , an Oregon corporation. 4. Tracts A and B in the plat of Way Lee. to be conveyed to Way W. Lee, General Contractor-, Inc. , an Oregon corporation. The surplus right--of- way of 69th Avenue in the Plat of Way Lee should be vacated in a separate and subsequent action of the Council . The legal descriptions in Exhibits C and E: would retain slope easements for the City where appropriate. br•/1314D c Qvc (S1 I C) Atr& a i l►ala a i a a a , a a a a + a a a a a ! !i a a a ! ! , t _. _ _._,__..-- .�,�-_ ._._.. ss-__ .._.�_-__.,_.., � 1 � i � fl I_Jt I_ii Ii 1JF T+ �PRt +la ut ralrlr aa , _ . _ ;: NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN _ THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO JIM THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. -- -- ---- ; os- 6z sz_— La— -az sz yz ez zz—tz- oz sr el —u -si--si b� e!_ Z-1 -101-15- ® . _9 s t, e z a� --•� — A1tai+alll!! x: MARCH � 1990 - i' y SITE PL,� w :V' A Q F t 4 �O 0 0 CO �* 1.'=150' / W t t N 5000 - + l 6502 D A 7r4G>< Q L.I.D.BOUNDARY Ry 6e 4Z; Tr � 8 - } 3 2tl0 DA 100 DA a 2400 DA � + (.)Jay !_ems °D + + DA r W P�RGEc A/o 3 - r�L�rtf�,e« 0 Pe9RC� /VD. 2 'fig i ii< yl/�trBq M ¢ ; Ld +N 4000 ki 41 DEA 2300 DA AWC64 Nc ODOTIMPROVEMENTS SW;ATLANTA AVE — — — SW HAINES RD + + i w > t . > > Q I 1 ,- llhll ill 1(1 111 Ile 11/ 111 111 11f III 111 Ilt 1(1 I I 1pi T 1 1 t ! ( 1 l 7 i fIi 1 1 IIT it Iil ill ill IIT 11r 111 111 ! 1 111 1(1 1 1 111 !li 111 111 1{I FII _- ., ('1�1�)'T'imI I P1 t J�t�i I I�_ I i I I� I I C 7 I l �' I J I I NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED — .. 2 312 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN - THIS NOTICE, IT IS WE TO - THE DUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - __,._.,__ ,y , DRAWING. ---- '-- _... _ OE 6Z 82 tZ SZ SZ bZ E2 ZZ fZ OZ 61 81 LI 91 SI bl EI ZI II- OI 6 B L" 9 -- S b £ Z rnitauluulnu6u,luulluduul+Il+ll�nll . - --- MARCH91990 LIJ .9 V.a �� � .� r OldyL `o y3i.c � .moi w b" LJLJ e0 g S d y m a i d 0 g W� �-� vui p .ad Ou �� o ? p a1 L9 00 0 _ u :14 0 U. U N= a w v0 0 u .I.- '•, WO E od__OyX) 0-0 qj Ld -j CV �-v - J ate, 3 Z3c � 3a `_" � Q�" gyp'. SC �► - w O z� L N3 „ offtj > o eco ° m IL w4�3�ro u � " F 10 CL�� uQ Lil o " p gab$ I u L �C N ** a a�O W x W wcZ a " a n U o 00 0 0 X. t Is 0 03u �`+ o�iva c :A LU � a �� � dQ C � cwIt. 1 ' u v d dJ [., a La, O L > Q ppb Lp"°' nbtr 4 E uv %,0gvs � `' T 0d L 0 o O �Ju 3Np.♦ flay Vi V C u V u 0 = N �+� L 0 �.11 u > ° v I� QZa � Oo �� 1 a _ '- c0c„ E ° or19t� b � ^ a V JJ I Z OuH •.O20 ¢ a a( ort7 J Q�U►� u., d �O�-.t1 � vp"n 0-m-9.0 ~ u a o�+OOZ t s W ` r n ►- M M n v ries-xa se.ree .a•. g•pd Q. ..: ti • r � � tiG � , � 1*� H •r a M u Np / � I" •1 r ■may € _ � \ t9v ��� v♦ L68 r ',r gr 107 � � f z � � • to / B � O Q � n p r �.s =// _ 9£G'J7► /y.0r.00 N .1 t� � O OP, Mf V _ � ■ rvtir O 9 • ZFO • V de J u Odff v .`, r�g�d rsv / l �. /•� L tot It � _ _ X4 , Y Ln 0 O r....•' f _/ ``�._.�•v..�9 �� / i yeti '[:. �ZO: U O�a 0 �J U 0 m W� O�0 jp ID Ob d �$ L9 m Q� 0 0 �_u O� � �� ZY O U V S a� u O. N e ° N �y 1 14 t0 ° N - v Y 0 �• � 0 ,n c 1) -6 ap y a WV ud ..iw-0 o 1 .fi b a 3 � aosU 3 ib o 41 t Z c p 0oio° �3so�-i-Z i�0 y q N y I u 1 O y V� J a rj 7C) u q m = N w e u LAN �v 0 °�` Wz0 °s 0 d�°�$ I N a �c Q= L s•� u i l� l� , a c2 N �' U QEi+ U w 0 u� �l ;, O ULu . aN� O � QL� a = Q' � � " " Z � v m� L X03 L� oEi � a � m CZOCc: Ovng � 0 4c u-•� C., •�' d y•Q 0 tL U-�, L 1;�■ E O a d v Cr " "-0- -C a K. U _£ 0d L ..'° � O U Js �Ju N pc1S+1 L . ° SO 0.4 = l�ti43 0N�� odav� d v = 2J+u� ou .,`` o'��-fir' i �L �ZNC v� oc u CCzOOU.n � rc � `yu ., o a u Y n Ocb J Qwl0.JOIO �j \0 t oL+OOZ 'SW V r n zp o nr ,� a it r nr 1cQ.s�xa sc.*at ------ \, s,o,d LL rc� r,1r ,Qo •oo s . a•. v • r r ko •73d � b� ` � � � - � � SCC 0 b Z L \ •Fri �/4 0 4 or L6'E • • • = ,y(� 107 8,09 t .. Y V W 3 --' g L K 0 ■` t 1 n d • �- + /7.01 Y 04 " 0 N vi � ♦ NL+2 O�Y�� i � 4 ■� J v u Oa a -+� v 1.00.6 R\ w Y �, �y fa , �/ '�� .s.Od� ti GG to w "64 \� 5 ~« 0 � 0 0 04. =.n M4 l `b Jf v ne• i N� + � !• w �: •� • H h N 9'IL ,of •� ` � i J �� L A �= �r a ± = O x e t n �� ■ . . � \ 8 Ee, ,`per '04 �uam r \ a ., v8 �aa ,amlJo� , d 1 / \ W 7L T V Lto to c n0NA0N ^pnw � rJ � - ►p10r�� V I^O ---- • t o c+ e zin M,o►.00 � t V Q J l V OQ Y J v U OQ t J V u d a..Y ai n, \ p.vne�•�' �• OS O 4 t • EXHIBIT C Property to be conveyed to Oregon Education Association, an Oregon nonprofit corporation PARCEL NO. 1 A parcel of land in that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Commencing at an old 3/4 inch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80--14679 of parcel 111; thence along the east line of said parcel :LII, also being the west line of a parcel described by County Recorder's Fee No. 82-•3895, on a bearing (basis of bearings is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 495.04 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence on a bearing of North 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 305.97 feet to a point of nun--tangency; thence along the arc of a 299.50 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 04 seconds, an arc distance of 321 . 13 feet (the chord bears South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds Wast 305.97 foo L) to Lhe point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.200 acres, more or less . Said property is subject to the following encumbrances: 1. Restrictions and limitations of access created by: a. Deed from State of Oregon to PCiE recorded January 29, 1967_, Book 456, Page 434, Washington County. b. Dead from PGE to State of Oregon recorded December 4, 1980. 2. Easements reserved in the following deeds: a. OEA to State of Oregon, June 2.7, 1982 (slope) b. IDEA to State of Oregon, June 27, 1982 (drainage) i C. OEA to State of Oregon, July 1, 1982 (slope) d. OEA to Feichtmeir and Warren, February 17, 1982 (sign) i 3. Conditions and restrictions as disclosed by Contract of Sale from IDEA to Feichtmeir and Warren, February 17, 1982. t 4. Any matters which would be disclosed by a survey or inspection of this property. i 5. A perpetual easement retained by the City of Tigard for the maintenance, repair or reconstruction of the embankment slope of the public road and appurtenances in the area described as follows: i, Exhibit C Continued SLOPE EASEMENT A portion of that parcel of land situated in the southeast quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon as described in County Recorder' s Fee No. 85044008, Parcel B, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of Parcel B of said County Recorder's Fee No. 85044008; thence on the west: line of Parcel B, North 010 47' 04" East 70.00 feat; thence North 170 50' O1" Fast 112.01 feet to a point of nun•-tangency; thence northerly on a curve concave to the west 112.75 feet through a central angle of 220 18' 57" (the chord of which bears North 140 15' 37" West, 112.04 feet) to a point on the west line of said parcel B; thence on the said west line of Parcel B North 010 47' 04" East 20.64 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence southerly on a curve concave to the west 321. 13 feet through a central angle of 610 26' 04", (the chord of which bears South 011, 47' 04" West 305.97 feet) to the point of beginning. Containing 0. 114 acres. br•/131.4D EXHIBIT D Property to be conveyed to Raymond A. Feichtmeir and Frank M. Warren, Jr . PARCEL NO. 2 A parcel of land in that part of the Southeast Quarter, of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at an old 3/4 inch iron pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorders Fee No. 80-•14679, parcel III; thence, along the east line of said parcel III, on a bearing of (basis of bearings is the Oregonsate C�.:�r'dinate System) distance of ane South g O1 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds Wost, 90.45 feet to a point, thence, leaving said east line, North 39 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 95. 15 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 340.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a .55 central angle of 04 degrees 08 minutes 14 seconds arst� ond s West `?_'4`54 PAet) ismfeet (the chord bears North 37 degrees 10 minutes O1 to a point in the north line of said parcel II.T; thence, along said north line, South 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 78 .36 feet; to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.082 acres, more or less. The said property is free from all encumbrance except a mortclage with Horace Mann Life Insurance Company recorded July 3, 1969, Book 149, Page 226. Conditions land Restrictions. this declaration sha11 curls tit:utV a covenant to run with the land described herein and shall be binding on all persons claiming under the grantorand these restrictions shall be for the benefit of an limitations upon all future owners aon the rof said real property, to wit: none of the redwood trees existing real property, or any replacement thereof, shall be moved, removed, damaged or destroyed. br/1314D 4 t r r f f s r k e k r t i �- i EXHIBIT E ( Property to be conveyed to Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , an Oregon corporation PARCEL NO. 3 That part of the: Southwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Commencing at an old 3/4—inch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80--14079, parcel III; thence along the north line of said Parcel II:1: on a bearing (basis of which is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of North 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds west a distance of 150.67 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence along the arc of a 400.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 04 degrees 56 minutes 53 seconds, an arc distance of 34.54 feet: ( the chord bears North 26 degrees 39 minutes 01 seconds 34.53 feet) to a point in the east line low of Lot One of the P.laL of "Way 1-ee"; thence along the aforementioned lot line South 01 degree 39 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 30.36 feet to a pipe, in the north line of Parcel 111. as descr•ibod in County Recor.Jer•' s Fee No. 80-14679; thence along said north line South 88 degrees 12 minutes .15 seconds East a distance of 16,38 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.006 acres, more or less. The City of Tigard retains a perpetual easement for, the maintenance, repair or reconstruction of the embankment slope of the public roadway and appurtenances within the parcel conveyed by this document. br/1314D CITY OF -TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 14 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street and Utility PREVIOUS ACTION: Called fur public easement vacation public hearing — hearing on 9/14/87 — Res. 87-117 portion of SW 69th Avenue and adjoining utility easements PREPARED BY: Development Services M DEPT HEAD OKCITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Community Dev._Dept. POLICY ISSUE Council initiated street and utility easement request; consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION SUMMARY In 1985, property owners in the 68th Parkway Street LID dedicated right--of--way for the new street, with the expectation that the City would relinquish any resulting unneeded remainders of property upon completion of construction. On Iffffim September 14, 1987, Council initiated the process to vacate a remnanL portion of SW 69th Avenue and adjoining utility easements which will assist with the completion of the L.lD. 1"he improvement of SW 68th Parkway between 'SW Atlanta Street and SW Pacific Highway has removed Lhe need to retain this night--of--way and utility easements for public purposes. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Approve the vacation request as recommended in the attached staff report. 2. Request staff to prepare resolution denying proposed vacation based on objections and remonstrances received during the public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT Approximately $300 for advertising and recording fees. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 with motion to approve the Ordinance as presented. cs/1349D r9�j�. rte.:•`� �•w - r.4 Yt i�f`II r r `1ti1 ' ■ 111/1 t ■� i/■ ��� ■ 'y RE sill all itt�_ �■ IRK MINN :1.m i tilt 1111atimit's Rim ■ ��/� ■.�� ■■� ... ..r.,�� --; ,,• � 4 'v a ■ . .■ . Iia ■/1 . _111■ r� I..■ . .:. s1/1�. ./ ._ r ti +: nlow !�!M/:c ilir L111 ! ■ow! v5 J NNE mom DO Yy _S�_Jsqlvs, mr man \ arms soon IN ■ t r: .'�+i� sem■ .1111/ _ , ■� y- Now INN m f �- .1/18 ■'@ �. 1� . �„ ... __ ■■ ■ to `': ,� R �, �_ ■� ' � � %L �� t� ■�� \{`. ,,. /K///�/� , ■limed I t�i■ .. mom t ' �■���- INN _ __ ■■ . ■ _ _ ■t - x S +>4::.. F� 4 ' � afil r � r [�N �ti r '4 1 � a;.j r r_ rt YR• raj d SII ar MEMORANDUM N� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council October 15, 1987 FROM: Randy Clarno, Development Services Manager1� SUBJECT: Community Development Department Report for Proposed Vacation of a Portion of SW 69th Avenue and Adjoining Utility Easements BACKGROUND This portion of SW 69th Avenue and adjoining utility easements were dedicated Sim EM for public purposes in 1975 by the recording of the subdivision plat of WAY LEE:. the improvement of SW 68th Parkway between SW Atlanta Street and SW Pacific highway has oliminatfad the need to retain this right-of--way and utility easement f)r public purposes. FINDINGS // Planning Commission_ 1! On September 22, 1987, the Planning Commission reviewed the Community Development Department request and recommended approval (see attached memo from the Planning staff) . Traffic Circulation, Transportation Plan and Capital ImpnoLyomoant_s Plan There is no impact to traffic circulation, the Capital Improvements Plan and Transportation Plan as the completed construction of SW 68th Parkway fulfilled many of the needs associated with those items. Fire and Police Services Responses were received from both the Police Department and Fire District, and neither had concerns relative to service or response time. Drainage and Sanitary Sewer Both drainage and sanitary sewer were provided with the construction of the SW 68th Parkway LID. Other Utilities Responses were received from the following other utility providers and none had objection to the proposal. i Willamette Cablp Television Tigard Water District Metzger Water District t Portland General Electric General Telephone Co. fir.. Northwest Natural Gas RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed vacation be approved subject only to necessary recording and certification r•equir•ements. cs/1349D ism Em I MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i TO: City Council September 2.3, 1987 FROM: Keith S. Liden, Senior Plannur SUBJECT: 69th Avenue Right-of-way and Easement Vacation On September 22, 1987, the Planning Commission reviewed the above woposal. They decided unanimously to forward a favorable recommendation to City Council . sb/1029D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON /7 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: October 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: LID No. 35 PREVIOUS ACTION: — Final Enqineer' s .Report and Assessment Roll. PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole L9791-f-j— DEPT HEAD OK —]ADMIN CITY OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Shall the Council accept the final engineer' s report on the SW 68th Parkway LID and set a public hearing to consider- objections to the final assessment roll? INFORMATION SUMMA'RY The SW 68th Parkway Local Improvement District No. 35 was formed in 1983 for construction of street and utilities improvements. Construction was completed in 1986. A number of legal details regarding the right-of--way for the project needed to be resolved. It appears that these details are now all resolved. I t is time to close the LID. Attached is a final engineer' s report submitted by the engineering consultants . The report explains the final costs and the reasons for- cost overruns. In discussions in 1983 and 1904, the City Council had agreed Lh(it the City would pay a share of the cost of this LID project. 'rho City share is II-)% of construction costs. Properties in this LID were preassessed in 1984 based on estimated costs. The final engineer's report shows the additional assessment or Credit duo for each property now that the final assessments have been calculated baked On actual costs. In order to close out the LID, it is necessary for, the Council to set A hearing date to hear any objections to the final assessment roll. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Accept the final engineer' s report and set a public hearing on the final assessment roll . 2. Direct that the final engineer's report be modified. FISCAL IMPACT The City's share of construction costs is $67,565.48. The current Streets CIP budget includes $67,600 to cover this City contribution to the project. SUGGESTED ACTION Adoption of the attached resolution accepting the final engineer's report and assessment roll and setting a hearing on any objections to the final assessment roll. The date of November 23, 1987, is the suggested date for the hearing. The engineering consultant will be available on that date to answer any questions. br/1291D COOPER C01MB JLTANTS9 11MC. ENGINEERING/PLANNING/CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 11675 S.W.66th AVENUE• PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 • (503)639-4914 76100/55 March 4, 1987 S Mr. Randy Wooley, P.E. City Engineer City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: S.W. 68th Parkway, LID No. 35 Dear Randy: Enclosed is a cost summary and an assessment roll showing the amount each property owner owes for the improvement of S.W. 68th Parkway. The assessments are determined from the cost incurred by the City and were spread as follows: Street 50% Area and 50% Frontage Sanitary Sewer 100% Area Utility 100% Area Right-of-way 100% Area The methodology is the same as that adopted by the City Council in July, 1984. The area is computed for each lot based on a distance of 270 feet from the right-of-way line of S.W. 68th Parkway. The frontage is the distance along the right-of-way. The area and frontage values for some of the properties have changed from those shown in the preassessment as a result of the alignment changes requested by the property owners and the Oregon Department of Transportation. The final cost of the LID is $807,885.10. This is approximately 15 percent greater than the $704,915.00 estimated in July of 1984 for the preassess- ment and 41 percent greater than the original engineer's estimate of $571,295.00 in April of 1983. The cost estimate history is as follows: 76100/55 68th Parkway March 3, 1987 Page 2 Preliminary Report Preassessment Bid Estimate Final Item April , 1983 July, 1984 December, 1985 February, 1987 Construction $363,495.00 $360,523.00 $438,000.00 $450,436.55 Legal , Engi- neering and Administrative 52,000.00 97,340.00 97,340.00 109,909.55 Right-of-Way 155,800.00 247,052.00 247,052.00 247,539.00 Total $571,295.00 $704,915.00 $782,392.00 $807,885.10 Estimates The estimate for the Preliminary Engineer's Report was made prior to the preparation of plans and specifications. A preliminary design was used for the preparation of the estimate for the preassessment hearing in July, 1985. The estimates for the Preliminary Engineer's Report and Preassess- ment did not include a contingency at the request of the City. If a contingency of 15 percent was included in the first two estimates, the estimated construction cost for the preassessment would have been within $5,000.00 of the bid. The preliminary design was changed twice after the ' preassessment hearing. The first change was at the request of the Oregon Department of Transportation. They requested that the intersection at Haines Road be moved east to avoid the construction of a retaining wall . The second change was at the request of OEA. They wanted the right-of-way in the northeast corner of their property moved to the northeast to avoid j conflicts with a future building planned for their site. Sf The changes in alignment caused the project to be delayed. It was necessary to revise the plans and right-of-way descriptions and obtain right-of-way. As a result of the delays, the cost of the project increased. The construction was started in early spring, a wet period, rather than the summer before, which increased the bid cost and contributed to the need for extra work, the removal of organic material and placement of geotextile fabric. The delay also increased the project cost by shifting intersection work from the state project on Haines Road to this project. COOPER CONSULTANTS,INC, I f 1 76100/55 68th Parkway March 3, 1987 Page 3 Construction In April , 1983, the Preliminary Engineer's Report indicated an estimated construction cost of $363,495.00 The preassessment estimate in July of 1984 was $360,523.00. These two estimates, as noted above, were prepared prior to the completion of final plans and specifications. The estimated construction cost for the final design and bid opening was $438,000.00 ($435,000 for contractor and $3,000 for PGE) The bid received from the contractor in December of 1985 was $419,125.75. This was not a fixed price contract, but a contract based on unit prices. The final construction cost for work performed by the contractor and PGE was $450,436.55. We have reviewed the Preliminary Engineer's Report, preassessment estimate, bid estimate and final cost to determine where the increases occurred on the project. The following list includes the major items which created the increase in construction cost from the preassessment to the final cost. 1. Retaining wall added along Newport Bay Restaurant $ 25,500 4,300 2. Alignment changed for ODOT and OEA 3. Removal of organic material and placement of 23,500 geotextile fabric 4. Revision of driveways at Newport Bay Restaurant 5,000 5. Retaining wall along OEA's parking lot 4,500 6. Landscaping and tree relocation 2,000 7. PGE construction 700 8. Other miscellaneous revisions and quantity changes 4,400 TOTAL $ 89,900 Legal , Administrative and Engineering The legal , administrative and engineering costs in the Preliminary Engi- neer's Report were estimated to be 15 percent of the construction cost, $52,000. The 15 percent estimate was determined by the City from other LID projects. It was unrealistic for this project and corrected for the pre- assessment. The preassessment estimate of $97,340.00 was determined by an itemized listing of the various components, the cost of which had been established after the Preliminary Engineer's Report. The final cost for the legal , administrative and engineering was $109,909.55. We have reviewed the costs incurred in this section and listed those items which were not itemized for the preassessment. COOS,i R COMMUL4ANT8,INC. 76100/55 68th Parkway March 3, 1987 Page 4 1. Preassessment $ 5,350.00 2. NOT alignment and intersection revisions 5,580.00 3. OEA revisions 2,590.00 4. Extra plans and specifications for bidding 280.00 5. Extra inspection and surveying 4,260.00 6. Warren Pacific Corporation credits 2,000.00 7. Mortgage survey 1,200.00 9. Items estimated, but not expended (8,690.00) Total $ 12,570.00 om Right-of-Hay The Preliminary Engineer's Report estimated the right-of-way cost to The$155,800.00, which was 125 percent of the county assessed value. county assessed values were used under the assumption that the relative values between the properties was correct. The 25 percent was added to the county assessed value because of the appraisal dates. The final right- of-way cost was $247,539.00 and was based on an appraisal made by an independent appraiser. The right-of-way was paid as a credit on the gross assessment. Property Owners The City should expect objections from the property owners on the final assessments, as a result of the increases in their assessments. We do not believe that we can change the assessment method at this time since it can only be done by the City Council . The final net assessments range from a credit of $1,227,82 to an additional amount owed of $38,874.86, an increase of 42 percent. 28150 Feichtmier and Warren Tax Lot 101 Decrease of $38;.49- 0.43% Tax Lot 102 Decrease of 6.95% 1, 227.Q The decreases on the Feichtmier and Warren property are a direct result of the credits for the right-of-way. The relocation of the street to the east increased the land taken from them, providing a larger credit for right-of-way. ,38,875.33 a2.44� Oregon Education Assoc. Tax Lot 2300 Increase of $� Conversely, OEA did not have as much land taken and therefore did not receive as much credit on the net assessment as expected in the preassessment. C®OPEER C®Nf3iJEsTAN T S,INC. 76100/55 68th Parkway March 3, 1987 Page 5 Way Lee General Contractor Tax Lot 6502 Increase of $9; 35.8% Tax Lot 2400 Increase of 26.69% 23,335.�3 Way Lee General Contractor, Inc. received a small triangle of land on tax lot 2400 and had less land taken than proposed in the preassessment. As a result, his assessment is greater than the overall average. IDI Z.i 18.53% Pollock Tax Lot 200 Increase of $ , The Pollock property had more land taken than proposed in the preassessment and received a larger credit. The increase is therefore not as great as some of the others. `, QG Portland General Electric Tax Lot 2300 Increase of $&r44? 23 11.53% ffm PGE's property has no frontage on the project, therefore only the area portion of the assessments applied and their increase was not as great as some of the others. We have enjoyed working with the City of this project and were very pleased by the recognition given the City by the Asphalt Pavement Association. If you have any questions, please call . We are planning to attend the council meeting for the public hearing on the final assessment to answer any questions. Please advise us of when you establish the time and place. Sincerely, COOPER CONSULTANTS INC. c Keith C. Thompson, P.E. Principal Engineer KCT/lc Enclosure: Cost Summary Assessment Roll cc: file (1.1) D. Kliewer t` 4 COOPIRIQ CONBULTALN'M INC. � s r COST SUMARY S.W. 68TH PARKWAY LID NO. 35 $ 450,436.55 Construction 247,539.00 Right-of-Way 99,301.22 Engineering and Inspection 2,000.00 Warren Pacific Credit 4,589.00 Legal and Miscellaneous Cost 4,019.33 City Administrative $ 807,885.10 City Share (15% of Construction) 67,565.48 Gross Assessment $ 740,319.62 247,090.00 Right-of-Way Credits 2,000.00 Other Credits $ Net Assessment 491,229.62 The above figures are based on the city of Tigard's records. Costs not own in the City's initial report but included in this report are $740.56 shown contractor not yet paid, and $1,500.00 for to PGE, $4,500.00 extra appraisal report. PGE costs have been transferred from miscelleneous to construction cost per the Preliminary Engineer's Report. ;2 11 IS!! 111FAIN2.11 Will r 'c I'll 11 co P W! H W 1 P 4 4 M1 O 11 N S 1 M1 11'7 I/'l P Y 11 N H on 1 N M1 4 P 11 W to 1 ' z cwn i r � No -0a :� .-0 I 11 f I II q 11 y I v .-0.. I 11 f I 11 f[ey 1 O O O O O 11 O I O to Irl 11'l 1I'] 11 O I m O 11 O Nl 1 -0 H H 1 C!! N -0 m H 11 P 1 In -0 P 11 O D 1 ^ 11 N 11 P 93C. V 1 M M N N N 11 N I 11 1 I 11 t � H -0 O M1 M1 Irl 11 N [D I 11 tid W "1 11'l m P N M1 P 11 LC [rl 7C 1 -0 M1 119 1- 4 P .Pn II = t tri to 1 K N V 1A m _ �� H w O f cc W 1 M1 O N .-0ti CO H 11 O �Z.. Lo, t w LA 1 N .M1'+ M .fir N .O•I --0"� 11 M1 to Q 1 M N M N 11 N W W S. W 1 m 11 O x U3 1 X tNLL, t 11 N J 6 P 11 P W O L,jt .1-> 11 O K x r t11 N d L (�( G =3 1 �,► li N W 9= O F 11 w O 5 4 1 11 [A W C u z 1 cq N N H 11 O 6 ►- t-] 11 O � !31 N (� t H O -0 11 P W ¢ # 1 b P h PO M1 = 11 IfJ X 6.21 i N [T 11'1 11 M1 J a I .P.. n N Irl N N 1 N N N M M N 11 N O 0 O Q Q �. 1 11 LL M m Z a 1 ly 6 11'l 1 .r .Nn a W W twrl Z O (` I•l 1 H M1 m a M1 -0 11 1f7 ) to LSD FI-' Op 1 O N O t L7 H .2 m O It C'4 O -Al i- W e !t a P 11 m �a U 9= m .mom P Ul LLQ I u Q 7t r 1 11 11 1 -0 M1 N 11 N 4 O / H N m a- 1 r 11 r 1 N ti N 1- m t� W i 1 0= a m 1 M N N 11 N f t4 1 11 Irl r 11 W .-. -0 O N N 11 H tal 1 � N r Irl Irl N H 11 I"'W -0 11 0 r 1 O Irf N ^ O .O 11 11'l 1 m 11 m N 1 M N N M N N N 11 N t I'll t LAA CD, O m Irl fl -0 C.01 to m O M1 m P It Q I-- ►� 1 -0 +n O N y -0 M1-I 11 0- M1 Z 1 O M1 cr- O � 1 rt If/ W 11 O 11 N P -tn„I O 11 P N r,: N J 1 ...I rt N H O N 11 .t`..I + } o 1 to o to u ki Li 1 ` m I 11 .0 -0 -0 o- LAJ 1 m cz 11 v h -W L-4 tO Y I n t M1 J t..i J Vco &Z f+ 1 M ¢� a s a to r-IFt � o O m o LAJI m W 1 W W 4 11 O O ~ = 1 6Wp d Dl O W_ W 11 M Irl N M M m 11 y. 1 W V W (~-1 S = ]C 11 tl't 1 J [IQC J c 1-- = p 1t V s n 1- ge i r z r z w --AQ ' W W S 1 ¢ C 6 0 LD W W O W 11 Z C 1 7t 6.1 r V A. I+- Y.. [L O 11 in LLS m y 1 N O O N O O fl W W S I-- 1 m ILD cz O O O .On O O_ II M O 1 M 6 J 1 4 -0 N N N tl to r ►'�' 11 O 4l P- 1 11 Z W Jy [.f] f` It ac Z s It d. 1 6 O O d D O d 11 to [l71 = LIC T_ 1 6 1 -0 -0 -0 ►-� 1 tt I F 'I h)o CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TtrCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SU_ MMARY AGENDA OF: October 26, 198% DATE SUBMJIIT : October 12 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Forfeiture _ PREVIOUS ACYION: Ordinance _------- PREPARED BY: Chuck Corrigan RE UESTED BY: David Lehr, Chief DEPT 11EAD OK, is CITY ADMIN OK_ Q POLICY ISSI:E seized proceeds and/or Should the City of Tigard process for•i=eitures of instrumentalities of criminal activity or continue processing forfeitures through the Washington County Counsels' Office. INFORMATION SUMMARY At the present time the City of Tigard has adopted the Washington County Forfeiture Ordinance. This requires that forfeitures arising in Tigard and e. Courts he processed by the County Counsels' Office. processed through Stat This procedure requires a �j0 percent sharing with the County of forfeited proceeds. Processing through Federal courts does riot guarantee any set percentage of return to the Cityf 1()10 a or•cetn t ttacedoof�nfor•feitedd procoodsguaranteE and Police and a rotur•n u F ins trumentaliticas, 1t� 1J processing costs. The ordin1�nccOfpi cc'S Seized lmoneyy for, processing forfeitures with the city Attorney All be securities, and negotiable insl r•ument's npr'1�<, ositoork, intvetst,t�hp money pending with the City ' s Financial Offic.c.r whc. y P oui:come of l:he forfeiture proceeding• Upon forfeiture the money, securities, k or negotiable instruments: and the proceeds of ]auctior Cd tF�r Chiefs of property polic shall be placed in an account or fund accessible_ only Y or his authorized designee to be used furl `�dsrtf shall1e'rbe ��made t to . Reports the City of seized, forfeited, and expended pros i Council . Adoption of the ordinance Would riot. pthel11ordinancefor-fpituis proceeding, through federal court when appropriate.par of the Police Department' s Operations � appropriate procedure will be made p' Manual to administer the ordinance. The ordinance has an camergency clause so L be received before the end of the Year' would be received funds anticipated to under the new procedures. Termination of the agreement with Washington County ediate termination by mutual. consent. requires 60 day notice or imm ALTERNATIVES CNSI ODERED 1. Adopt the ordinance as proposed with an emergency clause to take effect and notification of termination of the forfeiture immediately upon passage agreement to Washington County. 2. Retain the present procedure of forfeiture proceedings through the County. FISCAL IMPACT c Approximately 50 percent increase return of proceeds from forfeitures. 1. PP 2. Status quo. -------= SUGGESTED ACTION r Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance and notification of termination of the forfeiture agreement to Washington County. r cs/1311D r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. n ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR CIVIL.. FORFEITURE OF INSTRUMENTALITIES AN & PROCEEDS OF' _CRIMINAL ACTIVITY SETTING FlN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. that is seized from arrested persons which constitutes the WHEREAS, property rime must generally be returned to the proceeds or instrumentalities of a c criminal upon disposition of the charge; and WHEREAS, these iristr•umentalities and proceeds are often used to again commit the same or another crime and the return of the pr•uperty thus serves to encourage and perpetuate the commission of crime in the City of Tigard; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds that to protect the safety and welfare of the City of Tigard residents, it is in the best interest of the City of Tigard to: cripple illegal drug traff�4�rr,orisandc_alincotics with them,ltofs by the depriving narcotics dealers, and those r ' g instrumentalities and pr•or.eeds of their trade; sei.r..r.. gambling equipment, on records and the proceeds of illegal gambling activity; arid, to otherwise deter ills. al zAct:ivity and r•emuvO Lhe operating instr•umentalitic>s, profits and 'g < proceeds of cor•tain crimes from criminals; znd WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council finds it appropriate to use the forfeited property to fund law enfur•cement activities that could not otherwise be funded within the City's budget. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 , T_i_tlo. This chj+pter• shall be known as the Forfeiture Ordinance of the City of Tigard and may be so pleaded and r•eforred to. section 2. Definitions. (a) As used in this ordinance, unless the context requires utherwi5o (1) "Controlled substances" are those dofined in ORS 475.005(6) [1985 ed.] except that this shall not include less than one avoirdupois ounce of marijuana. (2) "Deliver or delivery" is that defined in ORS 475.005(8) [1985 ed.]. (3) "Facili.tate" means that the property must have some substantial. connection to, or be instrumental in, the commission of the underlying illegal activity which this chapter seeks to prevent. (4) "Gambling" is that defined in ORS 167.117(4) [1985 ed.]• (5) "Illegal activity" means: (a) Gambling or promotion of gambling; or (b) The manufacture or delivery of controlled substances; or (c) The possession of controlled substances with the intent to distribute. (6) "Manufacture" is that defined in ORS 475.005(14) [1985 ed.]. (7) "Marijuana" is that defined in ORS 475.005(15) [1985 ed.] . C ORDINANCE NO. 87— Page 1 (8) "Possession of controlled substan w .h the intent to distribute is that defined in 2 U C §8 (a)(1) [1976 ed. ; published 19811 . (9) "Production" is that defined in ORS 475.005(19) [1985 ed.] . (10) "Promotion of gambling" is that defined in ORS 167.117(10) [1985 ed.] . Section 3. Forfeiture. (a) Any person who engages in illegal activity within the City of Tigard shall forfeit to the City of Tigard the following property, and no property right shall exist in it: (1) All controlled substances which are intended for IM manufacture, delivery or distribution, or- that have been manufactured, delivered, or distributed; (2) All raw materials, products, containers, equipment, books, records, research materials of any kind which are used, or are intended for use, to manufacture, compound, store, process, distribute or deliver any controlled substances; (3) All conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels which are used to manufacture, deliver, or distribute in any manner- to facilitate the manufacture, delivery, or, distribution of any contr•o1.1ed substance or any such conveyance which is used to transport or conceal any coriLr•olled subsLance; (4) All monies, negotiable instruments, securities or other• things of value furnished or exchanged or intended to be furnished or exchanged by or to any person to facilitate any illcagal activity, and all proceeds and profits traceable to such furnishmeriL, exchange or illegal activity; (5) All proceeds, profits and things of value excepting residential real property traceable to any illegal activity; (6) All equipment, materials or records of any sort that: areused, or intended foruse, to facilitate any illeg<:al activity; and than residential property, which is (7) Al] rectal property, other used to manufacture any controlled substance, or used to facilitate the promotion of gambling as defined in ORS 167. 127 [1985 cad .]. (8) This chapter- shall riot apply to those acts made' unlawful by ORS 166.720. Section 4. Seizure. (a) Any property subject to forfeiture to the City of Tigard under this chapter may be seized by any police officer on behalf of the City without issuance of court process when: (1) The seizure is incident to an arrest or search under a search warrant or an inspection under an administrative search; or (2) The property subject to seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the City of Tigard in a forfeiture proceeding under this chapter; or under ORS (3) A police officer lawfully seizes the property 133 .525 to 133.615 [.1985 ed.] and has probable cause to believe that the property has been used or is intended for use in or to facilitate illegal activity. ORDINANCE NO. 87— Page 2 Section 5. Institution of legal proceedings. (a) In the event of a seizure under this chapter, the City Attorney, acting in the name of the City, may institute a forfeiture proceeding to obtain a judgment of forfeiture against the seized property. (b) The proceedings shall be instituted and conducted in accord— ance with the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure and the Oregon Rules of Evidence relating to civil actions. Upon the filing of the complaint, the City Attorney shall initiate an application for a temporary restraining order- restraining the return of the seized property to the defendant or other owner of the property. The defendant: or owner of the property may demand a trial. by jury in any civil action brought pursuant to this section. Section 6. Di_position of property. (a) Prior to obtaining any forfeiture judgment, any money, securities arid negotiable instruments that are riot retained by the Chief of Police for- evidentiary purposes shall be deposited with the Financial Officer of the City of Tigard pending the outcome of the forfeiture proceedings. The Financial Officer is authorized to deposit or- invest such property under the s<+me conditions that apply to the deposit and investment of City funds. (b) Seized property other than money, securities and negotiable instruments shall be kept in the custody of the Chief of Police or his designee for safe keeping until judgment is rendered in the forfeiture action. (c) When a judgment of forfeiture is obtained under this chapter, the property shall be disposed of as follows : (1) At the discretion of the Chief of Police, the forfeited property may be retained for official use in law enforcement activities. When the Chief of Police determines that such property will no longer be used for lae.i enforcement purposes, it shall be sold in accordance with (2) and (3) of this subsection. (2) Property (except money, securities and negotiable instruments) which is riot required by law to be destroyed and which is not harmful to the public shall be sold at a public auction by the Chief of Police. (3) The proceeds of any sale, and any money, securities or negotiable instruments shall be used by the City of Tigard Police for law enforcement purposes. Section 7. Non—Consensual use of property for illegal activity. No property shall be forfeited under this chapter to the extent of the interest of an owner who did not consent to the use of the property in the illegal activity. Section 8. Report to City Council. The Chief of Police shall provide a report to the City Council whenever property is seized, forfeited, or expended pursuant to this ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 67— Page 3 i f Section 9. Separability. If any section, clause or- phrase of this chapter, urt of or its application to any statute, is determined by any co competent jurisdiction to be invalid or- unenforceable for- any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this chapter- or- its application to any other- statutes, but shall continue to be in of-fect. Section 10. Emergency declared. Inasmuch as it is necessary for- the peace, health and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that this amendment- be made with the least possible delay to have the City seize instumentalities of criminal activity to fund law enforce— ment activities that could riot otherwise be funded within the City's budget, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage by the Council, approval by the Mayor, and posting by the Recorder. PASSED: By _,_ vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this _ day of _ 1987. Lor•een R. Wilson, City Recorder APPROVED: 'This _ day of 1987. Approved as to form: mas ThoM. Arian, Mayor City Attorney Date cs/1417D l ORDINANCE NO. 87— Page 4