Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/23/1987 3/23/87 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA - CATV sign-up sheet(s) . If no sheet is available, MARCH 23, 1987, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. o STUDY SESSION 6:30 P.M. 1. REGULAR MEETING: 7:00 P.M. 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. a. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) b. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 135TH/MURRAY LID 3. PUBLIC HEARING - MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - SDC CREDIT - CITY OF TIGARD A request for an amendment to Section 3 .20 of the Tigard Municipal Code to repeal Subsection 3.20.055 which currently allows for application of Streets System Development Charge credits when making certain improvements at the time of development. o Public Hearing Continued From 2/23/87 o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council - Ordinance No. 87_j2 RECESS COUNCIL MEETING 4. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING 4. 1 Call To Order & Roll Call 4.2 Approve Consultant Contract - Project Engineering - 135th/ Murray Road 4.3 Adjournment RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING 5. PARCEL 21 SEWER DISCUSSION o City Engineer COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 1987 PAGE 1 3/23/87 6. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 6.1 Approve Council Minutes - March 9, 1987 6.2 Receive and File: a. Monthly Departmental Reports - February, 1987 6.3 Approve Transportation Committee Restructuring - Res. No. 87-29 6.4 Adopt Final Order - M16-86 Appeal - Janis Youth Program - Uphold Director's Interpretation - Resolution No. 87- 6.5 Approve Board and Committee Appointments - Resolution No. a. City Center Plan Task Force Committee S9-36 b. Economic Development Committee C. Library Board `89-_&T d. Transportation Committee'�?q- 3q e. Utility and Franchise Committee '89-140 f. Park Board 8`T- L4 1 6.6 Approve Solid Waste Rate Increase - Metro Dumping Rate Increase 6.7 Approve Landmark Ford Appeal - SCE 13-86 - Final Order - Resolution No. 87- L4 a 6.8 Approve Economic Development Committee Role - Resolution No. 87- y�3 C 6.9 Approve Training Requests: a. Oregon Court Administrator's Conference - Nadine Robinson, Records/Court Manager - $180.00 b. International Institute of Municipal Clerks Certification Program - Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder - $380.00 FY '86-87 and $65.00 FY '87-88 7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 7.1 Beaverton-Tigard Councils' Meeting 7.2 June Council Training Workshop 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 9. ADJOURNMENT lw/4552A a COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 1987 - PAGE �7 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — MARCH 23, 1987 — 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder. 2. STUDY SESSION: a. Council discussed agenda items for meeting. City Administrator noted there was new information concerning the Janis Youth Home relating to the classification of this facility. He reported Council may wish to consider receiving more input and tabling the action item (resolution). Other possible agenda item changes were noted. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7: 15 P.M. 3. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator asked that a discussion item concerning a joint Beaverton/Tigard City Council meeting be placed on non—agenda. b. City Administrator requested that the June Council Training Workshop be placed on the non—agenda as an item for discussion. C. City Administrator reported that staff recommends tabling Consent Agenda Items 6.4 (Final Order — Janis Youth Home) and 6.6 (Solid Waste Rate Increase) . There were questions raised requiring additional time/input. d. Councilor Johnson requested non—agenda item discussion on Economic Development Committee. 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Several individuals signed in to speak on the 135th LID. Mayor asked these individuals to speak during the time designated for this topic on the Agenda. C. Mr. John Drennan, 11495 S.W. Gree burg Road, Tigard, Oregon 97223 asked to speak to the Council c-ncerning the Janis Youth Home. Mayor advised Mr. Drennan that Council discussed, during the Study Session, the probability of tabling action on the proposed resolution during consideration of the Consent Agenda. Mayor further advised that latest information Mr. Drennan provided staff will be reviewed. Mr. Drennan distributed to Council the information he had provided staff previously. Mr. Drennan will be notified of the next meeting date on this L_ topic. Presently, it appears as though it will be scheduled for the regular meeting of April 13, 1987. Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 5. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEA93M — 135T11/ISiR MV Local Improvement District a. Mayor called for continuation of the Public Hearing on the proposed 135th/Murray Local Improvement District. b. Public Testimony Proponents o Larry Westerman, 13665 S.W. Fern, Tigard, Oregon 97223 testified that there was no question that 135th Avenue should be improved. Mr. Westerman commented that his property was assessed approximately $2,000 for improvements to Fern Street made a couple of years ago. This LID included only those people living on Fern Street and the 135th extension. He said that while he and his neighbors will be accommodated by the changes to 135th Street, it wasn't necessarily appropriate for them to make payments for that improvement. o. City Engineer submitted a letter signed by 51 people in the proposed LID area. The Mayor read the body of the letter into the record: "I am not totally opposed to the LID and I would like to see the reconstruction of 135th. Including the Murray Blvd. extension certainly makes sense if it reduces traffic flow off of 135th, and more importantly, reduces individual assessments. However, other options might be considered to reduce the cost, it at all possible." Opponents o Dan Duggan, 11035 S.W. 135th, (Lot 2 in LID), Tigard, Oregon 97223 testified that 135th does need to be improved. Mr. Duggan's concern was that scope of the improvement is more than what is necessary. He gave suggestions for paring down the project. If the costs are not too high, he noted that he may be in favor of doing Murray Boulevard Extension at this time also — but not at the costs now outlined. o Mark Bonebrake, 13265 S.W. Falcon Rise Drive, Tigard, Oregon 97223 testified that he would like to see an improved 135th Avenue, but the overall project scope is excessive. He suggested that the City staff work with the people in the area to study alternatives to reach a satisfactory compromise. Mr. Bonebrake was concerned that the City of Beaverton currently has no plans to construct their portion of the Murray Road Extension. Until the Murray extension is totally completed, Mr. Bonebrake said there will be very high traffic levels along 135th. He asked Council what could be done in the Cinterim to discourage excessive traffic speeds and flow. Mr. Bonebrake suggested a series of speed bumps and stop signs. He was also concerned with the maintenance of landscaping. Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 o Marilyn Winter, 11599 S.W. 134th Place, Tigard, Oregon 97223 testified that she does not understand the cost of the project. She agreed that the project should be downscaled. o Roger Anderson, 10120 S.W. Kable, Tigard, Oregon 97223, was present as legal counsel for Mrs. Etta Donivan, 11545 S.W. 135th Avenue. Mr. Anderson questioned the City's implementation of policy concerning the LID and listed his concerns. Mr. Anderson said he believed 64-70% of the value of assessment in this area remonstrated against the LID. He had several questions concerning the assessment method used. o Russ Krueger, 1335 S.W. 66th Avenue, Portland, OR 97225 outlined some plans regarding his future use for the properties he owns in this area. Mr. Krueger indicated he would be willing to construct, in stages as he develops his properties, a portion of Murray o Ed Forner, 11576 S.W. Sheffield Circle, Tigard, Oregon 97223 noted that his request for an audit of the SDC funds paid by the affected property owners in this area had not been satisfied. Councilor Johnson noted that there was discussion on this point at the last meeting and an estimate was given at that time. Approximately $240,000 was contributed by the affected property owners ("ballpark figure") and $209,000 is j i being utilized for the project. o Kathy Baxter, 12950 S.W. 135th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 97223, testified she is not in favor of the project at the scale being E proposed. She expressed concern over increased traffic being ; created on 135th. Ms. Baxter also questioned the design of the street. C. City Engineer reported that valid remonstrances received by the j City represented 48.18% of the proposed assessment area. "Valid i remonstrances" were those received prior to the close of the I! March 16, 1987 Public Hearing. Inclusion of late remonstrances f would increase the percentage to 49.7%. City Engineer noted that people who would be required to deed land for right—of—way have all remonstrated against the project. City Engineer reported, in response to question by Roger Anderson, that if one property owner signed a remonstrance, then all of the property owner's area was counted as a remonstrance against the project. d. Public Hearing Closed. e. Comments by Council o Councilor Edwards commented on the amount of time expended and material read by the Council for this proposed LID. He noted he is not a proponent of LID's in general. Councilor Edwards said it appeared that the consensus was against the LID as it r had been proposed. Therefore, he said would not vote for this project as it stood then. Page 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 o Councilor Schwartz noted he generally concurred with Councilor Edwards and he, too, would not vote for the proposed LID. He commented on possible options for downgrading the scope of the LID which included the removal of a bike path and not constructing the Murray Road extension at this time. He said provisions for future growth were in the proposed LID, but would be eliminated in the downgraded proposal. o Councilor Eadon remarked that the proposed LID would have accomplished more than just upgrading a road; traffic planning for future needs were being addressed as well. She noted the area shows signs of continued growth and the problems being experienced will increase. However, it appeared that the neighborhood perceives that some of this project is premature and too large in scope. Therefore, Councilor Eadon said she will not vote on this project as it is currently proposed. o Mayor noted that a majority of property owners had not testified before Council; however, a downscaled project appeared to be the consensus as to preference for the majority of those who testified. Mayor said, therefore, it would be in order to ask City Staff to review alternatives outlining variable sets of deductibles. He noted that the City should meet with Mr. Krueger concerning his development plans and a possible phase-in of improvements to Murray Boulevard. o Councilor Johnson noted that the savings in dollars may not be great even with reducing the scope of the project. Councilor Johnson outlined the apparent consensus for a downscaled project from those who testified. o Mayor noted staff is to meet with the consultant and review the LID proposal with the following changes and/or conditions: 1. LID shall include improvements to S.W. 135th Avenue only. 2. The intersection shall be designed as currently proposed. 3. S.W. 135th Avenue is to be designed as a local street with one bike path and no sidewalks. 4. The proposed right-of-way should be retained at 60 feet for possible future needs. The legalities concerning the acquisition of this right-of-way shall be researched by Legal Counsel. Councilor Johnson requested that Staff keep records of the right-of-way acquisition costs. 5. Legal Counsel should respond to the legalities concerning the assessment method utilized. Legal Counsel noted that the current policy does provide for the "trip-generation on zone class" as a method of ( assessment for LID'S. f. Community Development Director reported that a delay of this LID will, in turn, delay other developments proposed for this area. Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 g. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to schedule this item for Study Session review on May 11, 1987 with those who testified at the Public Hearings to receive notice of the meeting; that the Public Hearing will be continued to June 8, 1987, with renotification of all affected property owners of said meeting to be done by City Staff. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. c h. Mayor urged citizens present to participate in the upcoming !. meetings. Suggestions regarding a downscaled project would be appreciated. He also encouraged citizens to contact staff with their ideas. i Councilor Johnson requested staff to do research for an estimate on the SDC contributions made by residents in the area. City Administrator acknowledged that this will be done. i 3 COUNCIL MEETING RECESSED AT 9:00 P.M. COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:12 P.M. 6. PUBLIC HEARING — MUNICIPAL 700E AMENDMENT — SDC CREDIT — QTY OF TIGARD A request for an amendment to Section 3.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code to repeal Subsection 3.20.055 which currently allows for application of Streets System Development Charge credits when making certain improvements at the time of development. i a. Public Hearing Continued From 2/23/87 b. Community Development Director summarized. On January 19, 1987, } i the City Council discussed various methods to utilize streets system development charges (SDC) . The Council chose to eliminate the SDC credit procedure contained in Section 3.20.070 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The proposed Ordinance removes the credit procedure effective May 1, 1987. Any credit requests pending prior to that date will be processed through City Council in the coming months. The Metropolitan Portland Home Builders Association reviewed the proposal and agreed with the intent of the proposed Ordinance. C. Public Testimony — no one testified. d. Community Development Director recommended approval of the proposed Ordinance. e. ORDINANCE NO. 87-12 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.20 OF THE TIGARD MUNCIPAL CODE — STREETS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES — TRAFFIC CONTROL. f. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt Ordinance No. 87-12. Approved by a unanimous vote of the Council present. Page 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 7. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING - Since there was no approval of the 135th/Murray Boulevard LID proposal, the Local Contract Review Board did not meet. City Engineer advised Council that due to additional research for downscaled project on 135th LID, Consultant fees will probably go over the $15,000 previously authorized. 8. PARCEL 21 SEWER DISCUSSION a. City Engineer reported that Mr. St. Clair and Ms. Leiser shall be meeting to discuss how to resolve their problems concerning the easement needed for sewer service to Parcel 21. Staff discussed this issue with Council at the February 23, 1987 meeting. Staff has met with both property owners. 9. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to table Item 9.4 (Janis Youth Program) to a to-be-determined date, table Item 9.6 I (Solid Waste Rate Increase - Metro Dumping Rate Increase) to April 13, 1987, and 9. 1 Approve Council Minutes - March 9, 1987 9.2 Receive and File: 1 a. Monthly Departmental Reports - February, 1987 9.3 Approve Transportation Committee Restructuring - Resolution No. 87-35 9.4 Adopt Final Order - M16-86 Appeal - Janis Youth Program - Uphold Director's Interpretation - (Tabled) 9.5 Approve Board and Committee Appointments (` a. City Center Plan Task Force Committee - Resolution No. 87-36 b. Economic Development Committee - Resolution No. 87-37 C. Library Board - Resolution No. 87-38 d. Transportation Committee - Resolution No. 87-39 j e. Utility and Franchise Committee - Resolution No. 87-40 f. Park Board - Resolution No. 87-41 9.6 Approve Solid Waste Rate Increase - Metro Dumping Rate Increase - ` (Tabled to 4/13/87) - i{ 9.7 Approve Landmark Ford Appeal - SCE 13-86 - Final Order Resolution No. 87-42 ; 9.8 Approve Economic Development Committee Role - Resolution No. 87-43 9.9 Approve Training Requests: a. Oregon Court Administrator' s Conference - Nadine Robinson, Records/Court Manager - $180.00 b. International Institute of Municipal Clerks Certification Program - Cath rine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder - $380.00 FY 186-87 and $65.00 FY '87-88 Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 i 10. NON—AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10.1 City Administrator reported on the joint Beaverton/Tigard Council meeting; consensus of Council was to set April 7, 1987 as the date. The location will be determined. 10.2 City Administrator noted information hand carried to Council concerning location of their June workshop. Council consensus was to hold the workshop at the Silver Falls Conference Center. 10.3 Councilor Johnson noted the meeting of the Economic Development Committee at 5:30 p.m. , March 26, 1987, at the Civic Center. She encouraged the Council members to attend if possible. COUNCIL ADJOURNED TO EXECUTIVE SESSION — 9:30 p.m. 11. EXECUTIVE Ste: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 10:22 p.m. Deputy Recorder — City of Tigard . ATTEST: Mayor — City of Tigard CW/4552A R Page 7 — COUNCIL MINUTES — MARCH 23, 1987, 1987 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6982 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 RECEIVEDonce BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising MAR 2 31987 • ❑ Tearsheet Notice • City of Tigard CITY Of TIGARD 0 box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 f AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION r STATE OF OREGON, )ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, I.Anne Jean I being first duly sworn, depose and say th t I am t�e Advertising , Director,or his principal clerk, of the �'igar Imes i a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state; that the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the + entire issue of said newspaper for i successive and consecutive in the following issues: March 19 , 1987 p' ,r C Subscribed to before me this M a r r h 1Q, 1 9 8 7 Notary Public for Oregon My GMaMleMott Expires: 9-20-88 ' AFFIDAVIT '� r f i:-_ < " 1 ' -r'r• sy- ice.- :.Y; , Svc Kl: � 31355i t sONga nmU H r ! CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING l^ In the Matter of the Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 87-12 (TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.20 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE - SDC - TRAFFIC CONTROL) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I, A 7 Z0 being first duly sworn, on oath, depose d say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 87-12 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated March 23, -1987 copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the day of1987. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me thi .t S day of 192 " t` Notary Public f for My Commission Expires: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87- LZ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.20 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE - STREETS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES - TRAFFIC CONTROL WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Municipal Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, the staff prepared an analysis of the streets system development charges procedure and presented options to the City Council on December 1, 1986 and January 19, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Council indicated its intent to eliminate the credit process contained in TMC Section 3.20.050 and 3.20.055; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed charges on March 23, 1987. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: ` Section 1: The Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended as shown in Exhibit "A", eliminating Section 3.20.050(c)(2) and 3.20.055. CSection 2: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after May 1, 1987. PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 23rd day of _ March _ 1987. COCkIIJ2 Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This 23rd day of March 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor br/3063Pt ORDINANCE NO. 87- Page i R EXHIBIT "A" (2) In cases where the planninq commission, site development plan and architectural review board and/or planning director determine that certain public improvements are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare before development of a parcel of land may ensue the cost of any of these required improvements which are deemed extra capacity facilities, as defined in Section 3 20 020 shall be a credit against the total system development charge that the developer would otherwise be obligated to pay. In determining those costs which qualify as contributing to extra capacity street facilities, it is understood that each property in the city is considered responsible for provision of a standard local street (see Section 17.28.040), sidewalk, street lighting (Portland General Electric specifications), and storm drainage An average cost per lineal foot of_ a standard local street will be kept on file by the public works director and updated annually. This cost per lineal foot shall be used as the standard for judging when the cost of required public improvements qualify as a credit against the system development charge (Ord 78-53 G4 1978. Ord. 77-26 95, 1977). 3 20 055 Credit for costs incurred in making certain improvements at time of development In cases where the planning commission, site development plan and architectural review board or planning director determine that certain public improvements are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare before development of a parcel of land may ensue, the cost of any of these required improvements which are deemed extra—capacity_ facilities as defined in Section 3.20.020, shall be a credit against the total system development charge that the developer would otherwise be required to pay. In determining those costs which qualify as contributing to extra capacity street facilities, it is understood t'iat each property in the city is considered responsible for provision for a standard local street (Tigard Municipal Code, Section 17.28.040), sidewalk, street lighting (Portland General Electric's specifications), and storm drainage. An average cost per lineal foot of a standard local street will be kept on file by the public works director and updated annually. This cost per lineal foot shall be used as the standard for iudging when the cost of required public improvements qualifies as a credit against the system development charge. (Ord 78-53 65 (Part) 1978: Ord. 77-26 J6, 1977). 3063P ORDINANCE NO. 87— Page 2 i AGENDA ITEM # -`VISITOR'S AGENDA. DATE March 23. 1987 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)` Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED AJ L W /35 GID wno.�� iClGTN t-l.D�;.n/ �OHN �IQcNN�}M 11415 Sw Mc-EMVw*"- `.4- TA-vis ourx p,,, 7v--+ l3rzj1-m IA w f3��5 Sw FF-1zrj �S C,V, t. 3 JLL, yt-> 6L -jXj e N t-A ,J-V - -V le O-Pa4v-v a,-(ei)40 LAJ FAA 4c CLIX prV- L 4c" y AGENDA ITEM # �_ - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE - °'. (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED KO M4 AA DATE March 23, 1987 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) ' Item Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2b - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 135TH/MURRAY LID ******************************************************************************* Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation ame, Address and Affiliation 5 SW RVI) Cud Bt� ����111` 13225 —• 1 C DATE March 23, 1987 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 PUBLIC HEARING — MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT — SDC CREDIT— CITY OF TIGARD Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation —�_ v lCu, `f, MEMORANDUM C. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 1987 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administratorb�y SUBJECT: 135th LID Developed Single Family Large Lot Deferral Options At Council's direction, staff has reviewed several policy options for allowing deferral of 135th LID assessment shares for developed, large lot, single family parcels. Since the LID spreads assessment benefit costs on the basis of trips generated for developed or potential land use, until these developed large lot single family parcels develop further, they then would not generate the trip volumes. As such they would be a valid class for applying a deferral until development. There are 7 parcels and 9 households potentially in this class. (� PARCEL ACRES EST. LID ASSESSMENT 1. 2 1.4 $ 17,883 5 2.4 15,125 11 4.8 64,504 160 0.7 3,559 161-162 1.1 6,228 303 2.8 (3 homes) 9,698 (-r3=$3232) 391 0.3 3,737 (Non-Remonstrance) 120 734 Two options - - other than the States low income senior citizen program -were considered. 1.) Acreage - Assuming an average low density benefit per acre, staff took the $890 average single family assessment times 7 units average per acre and creates a minimum assessment of $6,230 per household ($890 X 7) with anything beyond that eligible for deferral: PARCEL TOTAL - MINIMUM = DEFERRAL #2 $17,883 - 6,230 = $11,653 #5 15,125 - 6,230 = 8,895 #11 64,504 - 6,230 = 58,274 $18,690 $78,821 Bancroft SDC Deferral 2.) Minimum Benefit - Assuming a local street only theory and a proportional trip generation share, the City Engineer estimates a minimum benefit of $10,000 per parcel, so any deferral would be beyond the first $10,000: #2 $17,883 - 10,000 = $ 7,883 #5 15,125 - 10,000 = 5,125 #11 64,504 - 10,000 = 54,504 $30,000 $67,512 Bancroft SDC Deferral Should Council chose to defer all or part of the assessments, staff recommends the following general conditions be made a part of the agreement: o Signed Deferred Assessment Agreement; o Due on Sale/Development/Lot Split clause; o SDC Fund pays Deferral and gets principal and interest upon development; o Deferred principal plus interest at total rate for Bancroft Applicant's (Bond rate + 2%); o Right-of-Way Dedication as pre-condition of eligibility; o Non-litigation; o Lien recorded with County Recommendation - Council would need to give staff direction tonight and we'll incorporate that action into the LID Formation Ordinance for April 13, 1987. BJ:bs1022W L:- 1 4 + 1 the city shou]d d4Lher Lhc informaLiun 7_.0 F_E"ASTt17t_Il"Y POLICY )f TNTFNT cif I.hrr pr•opuand projnr.t .+nd f►PrpSS�r'y in or'dr:r' to ( etermirrr: t.hn Pf for sof the entirt., project. Ltr.r�L:�l.ive dc•scri► �. to dr.f'ine ttrc• city' - decision for thn Feasibility `�t.age is a r=snlution of i^'c�`Cssi.ngr�of The key public hearing. Again, the• p it►r district. and to scat. :� daLe frac a f recent changes information is the primary factor for efficiency• Trr addition, posed by the in the costs if not handled bond registration costs and 1.Fra construction limitations wcaathrr can increase both time and financial m the accepted city Effectiveness can be increased if staff ois sensitive to the efficiently. Ef f owners, yet riot swayed inLerc:sts of Lt►e proper-LY_ policies. standards, and practises. either Report is prepared in-house or Currently the Preliminary Fngineer s engineering costs are readirry of assessments. The for the staff supervises a consultant. On nearly all Projects' tal cost of the covered by city-funds until the sp engineering study are then included concentrates an the physical aspe is hof the Typically. the engineering study proposed project. general project have been guided by the g of the prof rovement of raw Decisions on the eligibility formed for the imp practice of discouraging proposed projects Highest priority is for improvements to an abliafod or undeveloped land. nts arelonger satisfactory. residential area where the iPrOvQ service which are no long increas'�d"cape►city or treplace Findin X2.1.1 The costs associated with financing are minimized if multiple LIDS are processed together instead of separately. problem by 2.1.2 Slow economic times have increased atingtaepossible cash flow chances for defaults em individual property owners, rely on for the city. The risk increases if the(see re pa payments art the future sales of newly developed land. the Appendix) 2.1.3 The potential economic return to the community from an LID requires a certain amount of risk. 4 More information is needed in the Preliminary Engineer's Report on 2.1. in terms of the city's ability to the financial feasibility firance the project. 's financial participation in an LID has been 2.1.5 In general, the City and varies due to the fund for oversiZing and extra-capacity balances in the appropriate funds. This level of city participation has therefore varied. s fundfrom the city, s operating � 2.1.6 The costs for this stage are paid acts until the spreading of aonly the city's ssessments. This imp it is a financial cash flow, however if viedistrict never forms. loss in the operating fund. PAGE 14 LTD POLICY AND PROCEDURES t rG4 if done by consultants, do 2.1 The Preliminary Enyinecr s Reports, not use' the same far•mi►t, creating prr�bt''n's ""d �"iried exprenYe later in the project. i. staff, the consultants are 2.1.8 When consultants are used by therefore more indirectly accountabte to Council th�luyar1arit�sventi"n by staff; staff has a marc indirect control vulnerable. T'd 2.1.9 The limit an city indebtedness set by the state i.n ORS 223.295(1) is "A city may incur indebtedness in the: form of :•" bonds and other obligations by virtue of the Bancraft Bonding Actto an amount which, exclusive of indebtedness for municipal utilities but inclusive of all other indebtedness of the city, of the latest true cash valuation of shall not exceed .09 (9X) city may issue the city. Regardless of the above limitation. a •03 (3x) of the } bonds under said Act in an amount not eXCThelegislature is now latest true cash valuation of t i at on city.,, :1. considering revising the the City has been reluctant to form LID�s for 1 2.1.10 in the Past. The City unimproved• raw land - since it aides a business .venture which. P1 additional long-term risks on the City. also-.can pdeveloped- residential area mss . much less I hesitation for of economic ;'mprovamant. Proposed districts in thecategory difficulty in development have given Council the 9 determining a policy. ii culating benefit which may Thorn era three basic methods for cal or in combination. these are: ba used solely units, J. by lot, square footage. dwelling } •, l a. By arae. . aquivalont dwunitsetc. elling i.Q. the band of area closest to the b. By zones or_ zonal,wr'Q than the bands) further away ia�provasant'binefits a Q, gy front&90. i.o• front footage. ,x }' 2.2 FEASIBILPOLICY S THE CITY SHALL NOT PROCEED TO THE FORMATION STAGE AND THE PUBLIC 2.2.1 NEARING S REPORT AND UNTIL ACCEPTING THE PRELIMITAORYFo I TME ' DISTRICT AND PASSYNG THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT SETTING THF_ DATE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. :z PAGE 15 LID POLICY Ahn OROGEiURES x .y v - r 0 2.2.2 EI_IGIBII..ITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LIDS SHALT DEPEND UPON THE USE OF THE LAND: (a) I:F TtIE: PROPOSED DISTRICT 1`.2 IN A DLVCLOPLO ARLA WITH LESS THAN FULL TO STANDARD SYSTEMS, EI-113IBLF_ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT'S SHALL nE FOR THE PURPOSE OF UPGRADING TETE SERVICE(S) TO THE PROPERTY OR SURROUNDING AREA AND SHALL TNCLUDE: r (1) THE CONSTRUCTION OR RECONSTRUCTION OF GEWERS, STREETS, STORM DRAINS, SIDEWALKS, AND/OR ANY OFF—S]'ItEL"T MU TOR VEHICLE PARKING FACILITY; (2) THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS; 1 (3) THE UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERIIEAD UTILTTIE:".. - r (4) THE MAINTENANCE OF NEIGIEBORItOOD PARKS. ! (5) OTHER IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE CONST.UERED ONLY IF THEY � 'f SUPPLEMENT THE LID PROJECT. ° s (b) IF THE PROPOSED DISTRICT IS IN AN UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL_ AND/OR INDUSTRIAL AREA, EL_IGtBLE PROJECTS SHALL BE: (1) FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLETING ELEMENTS OF AN ADOPTED CITY PLAN, OR (2) TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SHALL INCLUDE ! THE CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLETE: THE SEWERS, STREETS, '• SIDEWALKS, AND STORM DRAINS. (3) OTIEER IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED ONLY IF THEY 4 SUPPLEMENT THE LID PROJECT. (c) It THE PROPOSED DISTRICT IS IN AN UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL AREA ELIGIBLE PROJECTS SHALL INCLUDE T14E FOLLOWING: .) (1) THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS; (2) THE CONSTRUCTION OF STREETS, SIDEWALKS, STORM DRAIWS; (3) OTHER IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED ONLY IF THEY SUPPLEMENT THE LID PROJECT. 2.2.3 PROJECTS ARE PRIORITIZED ACCORDING TO THE ELIGIBILITY CATEGORIES AND FEASIBILITY INFORMATION. FIRST PRIORITY IS PROJECTS IN DEVELOPED AREAS (AS DESCRIBED IN 2.2.2(a)). SECOND PRIORITY IS PROJECTS IN UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL/OR INDUSTRIAL AREAS (AS DESCRIBED IN 2.2.2(b)). THIRD PRIORITY IS PROJECTS IN UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL AREAS. 2.2.4 THE CITY SHALL MANAGE IT'S ANNUAL INDEBTEDNESS SO THAT IF THE INDEBTEDNESS IN ANY YEAR GOES OVER THE LIMIT, THE CITY WILL ADJUST THE FOLLOWING YEAR. THE FORMULAS ARE: AVAILABLE ADDITIONAL DEBT = STATE DEBT LIMITATION — EXISTING DEBT (debt includes principal and interest) AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR 10% x AVAILABLE ADDITIONAL DEBT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION = 2 COSTS PER YEAR 2.2.5 THE CITY SHALL FURTHER PRIORITIZE THE TYPES OF PROJECTS TO BE CONSIDERED BY IMPOSING TIME CONSTRAINTS AND BY GROUPING SIMILAR PROJECTS TOGETHER FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPETING FOR LIMITED FUNDS. TABLE 3 OUTLINES THE TIME CONSTRAINTS FOR EACH TYPE OF PROJECT. LID POLICY AND PROCEDURES (5/2/05). PAGE 16 2 � l i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I TO: Mayor and Council / March 23, 1987 f f FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City EngineerpZL. L SUBJECT: 135th/Murray LID I have tallied the remonstrances received by the Council prior to the close of the hearing on March 16, 1987. The people submitting valid remonstrances represented 44 of the 437 LID parcels. The 44 parcels contain 48.18% of the property area within the LID. These figures include 6 parcels in Brittany Square which are subject to a waiver of remonstrance in favor of Washington County; it is unclear whether the waiver is valid in the current LID. Remonstrances were also received from the owners of 72 parcels in the Cotswald subdivisions, with one owner representing 71 of the 72 parcels. The Cotswald subdivisions are subject to waivers of remonstrance in favor of the City. Therefore, these remonstrances were not counted in the total remonstrance. The 72 parcels contain 5.28% of the LID area. A letter of remonstrance was received after the close of the hearing and was not counted. It was from the owners of 2 parcels containing 0.76% of the LID area. Testimony in support of LID formation represented 59 parcels having 17.20% of the LID area. Because the total remonstrance was less than two—thirds of the LID area, the Council may take any of the following actions: 1. Proceed with LID formation. If this is Council direction, staff will prepare an ordinance for Council adoption on April 13, 1987. Approval of the Board of County Commissioners is required. 2. Modify the LID. If the modifications would result in an increase in the assessment of any parcel, it is necessary to cchedule a new public hearing and to notify all property owners within the modified LID. 3. Stop the LID. If this is the Council decision, a motion would be appropriate directing staff to stop work on the LID. E C � /br0986W i i i NcP..n d c 3�< 3547 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Honorable Mayor & City Council March 23, 1987 FROM: Cathy Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder SUBJECT: 135th & Murray LID Attached please find letters concerning the 135th/Murray LID proposal. The top two letters were received after the public hearing testimony was concluded. All other letters were received during the public hearing. cw/4586A Attachment C i. March 16, 1V87 f L. Letter to l:o�lnci 1 , Planners, laity and County Engineers and/or whoever it may concern: He: Planned road wtkSWalnut to some "MurrayMurrayExtension" ) t may be known address, and brinq to the attention of those ! wish to briefly this project . concerned, three main points concerning First, I would like to ask the Council ,Planninq Commission or Engineers: What is the exact nature and purpose of this project It the nature of the project is to extend Murray to the junction of and to widen and/or improve S.W- 135th and Walnut; is to improve traffic flow between the and the purpose nd the 'l Hillsboro/Beaverton area aigato/theler main North/Southarterials generally, Western Washinqton County of the Willamette Valley) , then let those `hat stand to gain the most from it pay for it, namely the general pope 'e, developers and merchants/businesses. Second , 1 wish to ask; Why should local property owners pay for something they neither want nor particularly need'? Something that ity of life, shorten their life span and will decrease their qual increase their frustrations and stress. C;ranted, 1:�Sth and Walnut are rough but this tends to keep f 135th both the amount Ferry Roadeed andothernewlc own. The developmentsshasldeteriorated between Scholls YI'hey are severely, but shouldn' t this be repaired by the developers'?equipment they responsible for dincreased own what wtrafIlwillnagree,I ad the lalrheavy i eadyapoor oad . use has broken Third, 1 want to state that 1 fully object to any project that other than local , traffic onto S-W- 135 Ave. will tend to bring any, and S.W.Walnut . ollution or 1 don' t want or need the added noise, P path in to, frustration. i don' t desire to iuiteusenGrl.f�5tici toacross SchollspFerry Rd as and out of , my neighborhood. 1 q and o S Brous to travel a Normal route because I feel it is too busy 9 when not absolutely necessary. Walnut are totally residential both S.W. 13bth Ave or S.W. and are not, as far as I know, even zoned for business. Both have a rural atmosphere at this time and a wide, highly travelled road would destroy this. Has the environmental impact ever been considered? Has anyone considered how many children wait for school buses alonq both streets'? What will increased traffic do to their health and safety? 1 feel there are several better , more logical , alternatives to ,--7 ��G this project . � is 95s-o F� I a7 ItyY1 . March 8, 1987 cc City Recorder City of Tigard P. 0. Bax 23371 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: This letter is to voice our opposition to the proposed LID for 135th Ave. & Murray Boulevard. Thank you. Sinceroly, i���-cam' `."`%lam✓� zv.c-nJ Charles & Karen Halvorson Owners of Tax Lots: isi 33C 00101 isi 33C 00108 Ci COt,e vee 1366s' S,w, A-Adu1t 414AJC----, _ G� x-.��, :_: LJ.1LL/ASM L, 1312.-D Gv•iJ _ J a.IJNG -SCO�A/GO /-3/toc.1.J , L Il ;I _ ixP - ��er�adx,.d a r•:;r:.).,�."+=.,.::ri. - - i M E E F E I i REMONSTRRANCES RECEIVED MARCH 16, 1987 FROM ROGER ANDERSON i E { s ( a i I f i _ E - Y March 16, 1987 City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 I remonstrate against the proposed formation of an L.I.D. for the improvement of 135th Avenue as indicated in your public hearing notice of 2/27/87. My objections follow: 1. The construction costs outlined in the notice are less than half of those in the L.I.D. proposal yet our estimated assessment is almost $18,000; $1,000 to $2,000 more than in 1984. K q,-AA * J 2. Connecting Murray Road through to the south end of 135th Avenue near Walnut Street will turn 135th north of the Murray intersection into a minor street. This section does not need the elaborate construction proposed but rather resurfacing with a bike lane or sidewalk not both on both sides of the street. 3. The major use of the Murray extension will be to the benefit of people living outside the L.I.D. area. Therefore, other sources of funding should be utilized beyond the L.I.D. - State, County, City. 4. There has not been enought time for residents to provide imput on the proposal. No preliminary plans or study data was distributed to property owners. 5. A fairly large group of residents to the southwest of the 135th/Walnut connection are excluded from the L.I.D. and yet they have no other access to or from their residential area. 6. The amount of the assessment creates a serious hardship for many property owners. The cost of the proposed improvements if affordable at all will likely never be recovered-in the sale of the property even to a developer. Based on the above we strongly remonstrate against this L.I.D. PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS Ito 3 tj f City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue C to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens input ind were not ot thisLded ID any opportunity to have any put in theplanning and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. n DATE: 3/'V- '..14, C. Property Owners(s) Property ()wner's (s) Address: i-3! St) 6 V_.s. 2 Property Address (if different) C -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objectic^s - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning.Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. • r ' City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: 1 � ,-� A/ Property Address (if different) C' -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were net provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. ;?x K< i City Council City of Tigard Page Two r 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the eefproposed improvements. DATE: �,. Property owners(s) Property owner's (s) Address: �� S Property Address (if different) I C= -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. 5 `'. IC °_4 L �1 City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: 4PropeeOwners s) Property Owner's (s) Address: � ���_ �I✓ -�- r Property Address (if different) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C" City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: E_ Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: 722 Property Address (if different) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard ; Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW MurrayBlvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State :;ighway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard nwhich includes the area of this proposed LID apparently ot consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through hout all factors time for citizen input, Planning and considering involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvement7q� DATE: Aerty Owners(s) f Property Owner's (s) Address: 3/SS S.W. SMD 7l +e Property Address (if different) •sm City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- wandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. ;. 3 y City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: _i// // L*KK kW 7" Property e s(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. s City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop— erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Pro �tyOwners(s) Property Owners (s) Address: Property Address (if different) —2— t City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. r' City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against thisn LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: AIP 4<747 Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: 7iG�l� , a � 97223 Property Address (if different) -2- w S City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW MurrayBlvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135hAvenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens inard were planningnot of thisiLID any opportunity to have any put in the and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this without all factors time for citizen input, planning and considering involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop— erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improve ►vment DATE: l 1 [ 6 Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: �3 Zl� ��L✓ tS � - " -- Property Address (if different) ' —2— City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this JLID and the proposed improvements. / DATE. / -7 i/��IZ�Z Tna2•C/ Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: ' T T �Y -r! r-�/�- Property Address (if different) -2- �i. City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID.- This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: MQ ��v X987 ®roperty Owners(s) Property OT-mer's (s) Address: 11-700 .SW ( 3 '[ f�A Terrace_ �IA� nR. 97zZ3 Property Address (if different) �ras -2- e City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. E t C� � -M t 3 City Council i City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs t only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: 4r4ertys(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: , 7/�/G1AA,t Property Address (if different) C -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murra Blvd. LID Re: n I hereby object to the formation 135th of a Locale and SW Mu rrayBlvtfor e Blvd. , District as proposed improvement the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. against this LID for the following reasons: I object to and remonstrate 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector costs exceeding normalty, County and State should pay for all half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135hvenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnutis inadequate is onto handleest such traffic. Fowler Junior High and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7oflTiward which includes the area of this proposed LID apparent ot consulted; and the local citizens of in theard were not planning of thisiLlD any opportunity to have any p and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without and considering all factors time for citizen input, Planning involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use not these issalsotincreasescthe dassessments ttotthose e agnst i so within Th LID. � LID. C.- J City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: o ertyOwner s Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) C_ -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. :r, City Council City of Tigard Page Two i 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: �.. P op rty ers(s} Property Owner's (s) Address: IJ`l S �� (L�F n r p T�� ��- 6 iC C 7 z Z 3 Property Address (if different) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 tions - SW 135th Ave. and SW MurrayBlvd. LID Re: Remonstrance and Objec I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. against this LID for the following reasons: I object to and remonstrate 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and state should improvementspay for to locallstreetsexceeding normal standards. half streetP 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler nior High rafficSchool pastson a school create Walnut and to direct additional t additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 ofTigasd which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently ot consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. adequatethrough without time 4. It is premature to ram m this LID and considering all factors for citizen input, planning involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exchedeoulddnotsremonstratearea againstwho uthisuse these roads so that t y c LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the fproposed improvements. DATE: Q r perty �s(s Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. y City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously_ object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: r(� Atg�� A Property ers(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: L4 S Sw I-S tl-' 7TI-racc, T14ar-d , OR °l�Zz3 Property Address (if different)" Lln vh I -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. 1 ubject to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- L.. dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. r 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to a demonstrate against this_LID and the proposed improveme DATE: Property Owners(s)- Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) Z s -2- z 'ate City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements refereed to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City council city of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop— erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the city for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: -5' "'� 17 Property owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: %��n✓���j�i2 23 Property Address (if different) • �/ 6 � sc� ,v►�G��s w e w ' L wee► �- � � a /� S el-11-3/ Lj'' -2- t ?ti- cl` City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. 1 r City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: 2-16-87 . e �. Propert Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: 5ki S %Ople ID, 7�"� �a L'2e�• 9�3 Property Address (if different) i i 1 -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue ® to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improveme DATE: Property rs(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) C_ -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Ori on 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW MurrayBlvd. LID I hereby as well as object to the formation AvenueandSWcal pMurrayvemenBlvdstrict for the proposed improvement of SW red to in your Notice of Public Hearing the other improvements refer regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a SW h because the local collector localstreetstreetsch sand nottcollector streets. The City, only need local a for all costs exceeding normal County and State should pay half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue h resi- to Walnut will directly funnard from Beaverton to de traffic rState e to handle such dential neighborhoods of Tig C. Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequat hb west Walnut traffic. Fowler additionalHtrafficigh opast ol son ha school will create and to direct concerns. additional noise and safety 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the arca of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local nitineur of in theard were not planping of thisiLlD any opportunity to j 'y any p and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID thrconsidering all factoate time for citizen input, planning and involved. erry- 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and g the area who mandered so as to excludecouldresidnotsof remonstrate againstwould these roads so that they LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Ms C*4 LS tc:13-7 el-41� Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: L 3 4rAG 5 SW '5(21-K7_A­�/ �2 7 -2— Property Property Address (if different) 1 J ��C�RoJ�� Or. � L.. l • T� . W�Ttd o.� � ,�t �t,..l�-j 'To 2C7- k-1 CT ALLOVVS 2 0 L--+2^C )Y -2-) Tv-42-.& tit C� S'V-4 �`���- Gof t7 -7-WO — C®^.j c_ ,v LS A-L L- T� —2— rte- t� City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: �1/l r'/1. �6. Z Property-Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) -2- i City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW MurrayBlvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd., as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will CdloffTigard from unnel dBeaverton toe traffic rStateough resi- ., dential neighborhoods Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently ws ot consulted; tto havelanytizens of input in theard were not planning of this LID ded any opportunityLID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C- City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the/proposed improvements. DATE: Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) i i t -2- �y: City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a f collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents ` only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal i half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C.- City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other rea.Lis, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. 7 DATE: Sh/ ell— ProrpeVy ers(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: l7L� S eo -7-4Le-D� Q!' 1�?Z 2 2 Property Address (if different) C' -2- . f w City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. Tile Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- �. dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C c City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvement DATE: f6 �l ,P� .e�. . l '' • Property 0wners(s) / f� S Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) 314 c5uJ cOA) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murra Blvd. LID th I hereby object to the formation of aLocal improvementsw Murray Dis ,rictwforell ase proposed improvement of SW 135th Ave nue andthe other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. against this LID for the following reasons: I object to and remonstrate 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and flcosts exceeding normalot collector streets. The ty, County and State should pay or all half street improvements to local street standards. 135th Avenue 2. Facilitating a connectidirectly funneleen outsideatrafficRoad athrough resi- to Walnut will directly y dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such Walnut traffic. Fowler itionalnior HtrafficSchool pastson a school create and to direct add concerns. additional noise and safety 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7oflTigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparent ot calit of consulted; and the 10in Tigard in the planning of thisi iLID any opportunity to have y and the proposed improvements. LID through without 4. It is premature to ram nnins adequate time g and considering all factors for citizen input, pla involved. erry- 5. The boundaries to excludef this oposed LIresidents ofrtheeareaiwho w uld use mandered so a these roads sthat increasescthe assessmentshey ould not remonstrate tagainst i tothosewithinthe LID. This also LID. 1 City Council City of Tigard Page Two L � 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously �ob ect to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. ' DATE: Prop y Own ers(ss ) i Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C;; t l t 1 City Council j City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this ot area construct new buildttsuchswhich streetsdasnpartXofttheirso hat they do not have development. 7, When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition theirostland only against those property owners losrogeYart ty owner pay the is highly unfair. This makes such a p the City. City for the value of his land taken by For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. r 11 0", 111110 DATE: ' Property Owners(s) Owner's (s) Address: 3e.Z1�~ Property Property Address (if different) City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Property (hmers(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) _-2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity t_o have any input in the planning of th2s LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: Property Address (if different) C. . -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. 0 City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the _ City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, 1 (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: /7Y C �)A 1?ti�-�'�J Property owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: f � �S lv' ' /►'/J/��i/►�(S- Hl G LI 1ler Property Address (if different) I4 c5cuo.: Fh-e--cz/V Pt&E I -2- �= t r ��,� . =-o—,�� r��yrelr.� /�'o S. rrJ• i35�-s-- r t City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue Cto Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. I z • ti, City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against th 3 //an the proposed improvements. DATE: y/ Property Owners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: 119 �l —_ Property Address (if different) C -2- .tea Y - City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd._ LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. Tile City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of. Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. s T City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Property Owners ) Yr Property Owner's (s) Address: Sur Property Address (if •different) t -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue C to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. C T City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements. DATE: Property (Jwners(s) Property Owner's (s) Address: I/9Zp Property Address (if different) C > -2- I f City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area notohaveuto buildstreets streetsdasnot partexist theirthat they do development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many erties. The assessmentf rownersflosingacquisition theircosts land only against those property the is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay City for the value of his land taken by the City. strenuously object to and remonstrate For these and other reasons, I (we) against this LID and the proposed improvemen DATE: C, Property Owners(s) Property owner's (s) Address: + Z Property Address (if different) .f -2- City Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Remonstrance and Objections - SW 135th Ave. and SW Murray Blvd. LID I hereby object to the formation of a Local Improvement District for the proposed improvement of SW 135th Avenue and SW Murray Blvd. , as well as the other improvements referred to in your Notice of Public Hearing regarding this LID. I object to and remonstrate against this LID for the following reasons: 1. The Local Improvement District is the wrong way to pay for a collector street such as SW 135th because the local residents only need local streets and not collector streets. The City, County and State should pay for all costs exceeding normal half street improvements to local street standards. 2. Facilitating a connection between Murray Road and 135th Avenue to Walnut will directly funnel outside traffic through resi- dential neighborhoods of Tigard from Beaverton to State Highway 99W. Southwest Walnut is inadequate to handle such traffic. Fowler Junior High School is on Southwest Walnut and to direct additional traffic past a school will create additional noise and safety concerns. 3. The Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 7 of Tigard which includes the area of this proposed LID apparently was not consulted; and the local citizens of Tigard were not provided any opportunity to have any input in the planning of this LID and the proposed improvements. 4. It is premature to ram this LID through without adequate time for citizen input, planning and considering all factors involved. 5. The boundaries of this proposed LID were determined and gerry- mandered so as to exclude residents of the area who would use these roads so that they could not remonstrate against this LID. This also increases the assessments to those within the LID. City Council City of Tigard Page Two 6. The developers are attempting to have the residents of this area construct new streets which do not exist so that they do not have to build such streets as part of their development. 7. When compared with the proposed assessment for the 1984 LID, the assessment has increased over 50% for many of the prop- erties. The assessment of right of way acquisition costs only against those property owners losing part of their land is highly unfair. This makes such a property owner pay the City for the value of his land taken by the City. For these and other reasons, I (we) strenuously object to and remonstrate against this LID and the proposed improvements DATE: s a ►uJ�, p. C `{r C^,/t rroercrert1Je rs s�/r `}7o3r Property Owner's (s) Address , , 9 T S S. �,.�. nin �r Property Address (if different) C - -2- City of Tigard f 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. <F Tigard, OR 97223 March 21 , 1987 Re: 135th / Murray LID I am not totally opposed to the LID and I would like to see the reconstruction of 135th. Including the Murray Blvd. extension certainly makes sense if it reduces traffic flow off of 135th, and more importantly, reduces individual assessments . However, other options might be considered to reduce the cost, if at all possible. 7VM 75! J- 2 3 tl 3 Sw �' r 1I7 7 5w 13 T-�r'r t 10 I �r 11 12 13J 4n. 14 2 �1� 15 17 T C � 19 13210 21 2 / / �/ • • '� O r , i ,mzj rl • .c yff,11 WIN, WOMMImi owl, EVA' ST 1 s k ol n qq, 6 Q°25722- 44 �7?7 g(llcere T? CITv COUNCIL TIGARD, OREGON Since you as our City Council have asked for our imput I on the matter of the LID on S.W. 135th, we , as property owners ` give .you the following recommendations : 1 . Delete the Murray extension : it' s untimely, unnecessary, and expensive. 2. To redraw the boundary for the 135th LID to include a portion of the Murray LID ( see illustration. ) 3. To build a local standard street. If you want to build extra capacity, underground utilities, or other non- e9sentials, make that portion a city contribution. 4. Be consistent in ,your assessments. Trip generation based on future use produces gross inequities. 5. Work again with owners and developers to design an im- provement with which we can all live. 2111 6 �Jc%� d�-2 CITE COUNCIL TIGARD, OREGON Since you as our City Council have asked for our imput on the matter of the LID on S.W. 135th, we , as property owners give you the following recommendations : 1 . Delete the Murray extension : it's untimely, unnecessary, and expensive. 2. To redraw the boundary for the 135th LID to include a portion of the Murray LID ( see illustration. ) 3. To build a local standard street. If you want to build extra capacity, underground utilities, or other non- essentials, make that portion a city contribution. 4. Be consistent in ,your assessments. Trip generation based on future use produces gross inequities. 5. Work again with owners and developers to design an im- provement with which we can all live. S IT grc _9 72 23 s. /vknlj, _ �� �.� 11 35-'r,w , M tiW6, A& 6/?. :n 9 _�. a�.,.,.,..�.,�. � �:►�._ _�� 9 3�s c�_,__�,Y N�►��a�►moi-����7z� �-'- -- -<<�l!s fr�l �a� �� z ► 57�Z3 � � 1 S`S` S 1-✓ l�`anti.� .�y_ � t CITY COUNCIL TIGARD, OREGON Since you as our City Council have asked for our imput on the matter of the LID on S.W. 135th, we , as property owners give you the following recommendations : 1 . Delete the Murray extension : it's untimely, unnecessary, and expensive . 2. To redraw the boundary for the 135th LID to include a portion of the Murray LID ( see illustration. ) 3. To build a local standard street. If you want to build extra capacity, underground utilities, or other non- egsentials, make that portion a city contribution. 4. Be consistent in ,your assessments. Trip generation based on future use produces gross inequities. 5. Work again with owners and developers to design an im- provement with which we can all live. �J r 115-1116 S w 135�y& Y 3 CITv COUNCIL TIGARD, OREGON Since you as our City Council have asked for our imput Con the matter of the LID on S.W. 135th, we , as property owners give you the following recommendations : 1 . Delete the Murray extension : it's untimely, unnecessary, and expensive. 2. To redraw the boundary for the 135th LID to include a portion of the Murray LID ( see illustration. ) 3. To build a local standard street. If you want to build extra capacity, underground utilities, or other non- e8�sentials, make that portion a city contribution. 4. Be consistent in ,your assessments. Trip generation based on future use produces gross inequities. 5. Work again with owners and developers to design an im- provement with which we can all live. 4 9w� s • ' 111 1 i. . Tr� r 11111 � =�11�1 Wit\ �\■1��,`��:11��/+moi. , Ing it/s o IL 1 - D oDwct L enc mvef, oe, Y 4 h a t t F IF ILL-U IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON j,.( 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON •�• -�' t t1 1;1• .1 3 JANIS YOUTH PROGRAM, INC. , ) NO. 4 Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT 5 V. ) (FRAUD; BREACH OF CONTRACT; CONVERSION; RESTRAINING 6 LORETTA ALLEN,,- ._ ) FORECLOSURE; AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL) l �? 7 Defendant. ) l 8 i 9 For its First Claim for Relief against defendant Loretta 10 Allen, plaintiff alleges: 11 (Damages for Fraud) 12 1. 13 Plaintiff is an Oregon nonprofit corporation. 14 2• 15 Defendant is an individual whose last known address was C 16 11500 S.W. Greenburg Road, Tigard, Oregon. 17 3 . 18 On or about April 10, 1986, plaintiff as vendee and 19 defendant as vendor executed an earnest money agreement 20 ( "Agreement" ) for the sale of realVproprty ( "premises" ) located 21 at 11490 Greenburg Road, Tigard, Oregon. =The ,'premises were ( 22 *1mp"rbyied by';:a: large house which,plaintiff, now uses as a:'halfway 23houge �for !Eroubled':youth; A true copy of the Agreement is 24 attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated by this 25 reference as though set forth here in full . 26 Page 1 - COMPLAINT (FRAUD; BREACH OF CONTRACT; CONVERSION; RESTRAINING FORECLOSURE; AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL) 7) SPEARS.`v j✓" L eLEDSOE. ANOMC ON & YOUNG ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5� 570 S WYernhi0 St..Suite 600 Portland.Oregon 97204-1393 Telephone(5031776-6151 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE Of` ?FtEGQN FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON JANIS YOUTH PROGRAMS, INC. , 3 ) Case No . 86-11470 4 Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 5 V. ) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ' S MOTION FOR A 6 LORETTA ALLEN and JAMES F. ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CALLAHAN, ) (Oral Argument Requested) 7 ) Defendants . i s 9 INTRODUCTION 10 On Wednesday, December 10, 1986 , plaintiff in this i 11 action obtained an order from this court requesting defendants 12 to appear and show cause, if any there be, why a preliminary 13 injunction should not issue . The subject of the requested 14 injunction is explained below. Hearing has been set for 15 Thursday, December 18 , 1986 , at 9 : 30 a .m. 16 The requested injunction would enjoin a nonjudicial ! 17 foreclosure sale now set for Friday, December 19 , 1986 , as well 18 as the notice of sale that instituted foreclosure proceedings . 19 The facts supporting the request for preliminary injunction are 20 set out in detail in the attached Affidavit of Barbara Hutsell . 21 Briefly summarized, this case involves the purchase of 22 a -home by plaintiff , a United Way Agency, fro .I .defendant Allen, 23 for use as a halfway house for troubled youth ( "the 24 Property" ) . The bulk of the purchase price was paid at 25 closing; a balance of $20,000 was given in the form of a 26 promissory note, which was secured by a deed of trust . Payment Page 1 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction MILLER,NA H.W-EVER•4AGED L CARLSEN Anor lyn cro o,Lo- . i 115 % r hr e.. r,..^.••d G•.•oc- -'tC7 I on the note was set for approximately one month following 2 closing . On taking possession of the house, plaintiff • 3 discovered serious , latent defects in violation of express 4 5 provisions of the Earnest Money Agreement signed by both 6 parties . For example, rewiring was required to meet housing ! 7 code specifications .. A hole in the chimney covered with 8 sheetrock had to be repaired . Extensive plumbing work was necessary. Fixtures had been removed. In addition, defendant 9 i ' 10 Allen' s assurance that the sewer line had been brought right up 11 next to the house proved to be false . 12 Plaintiff made the necessary repairs and replacements i 13 of the breaches of the Earnest Money Agreement and defendant I 14 Allen' s promises . It then deducted those costs from the 15 $20, 000 balance due and paid the difference, notifying ' defendant Allen that it considered that amount to be payment h 16 e 17 full on the promissory note , and requesting reconveyance of the 18 trust deed. 19 Subsequently, defendant Allen ' s attorney, defendant 20 Callahan, who also is trustee of the trust deed, sent notice o 21 a nonjudicial foreclosure sale to be held on December 19, 22 1986 . This action was commenced when plaintiff filed a I 23 complaint for fraud, breach of contract, conversion and 24 injunction against foreclosure on November 4 , 1986 . 25 26 Page 2 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Q Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction MILLER.NASH,YIIENER.HAGER L CAPLSEN Ano•nevs end Cou'sele•s or Lvw Teleeho^ "5031 77-,-5E58 is. c. .. T r.H�.rrv, n. to^.. C•rc� c-:Ca._FtG I POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 2 1 . Irreparable Harm 3 Defendants have threatened and continue to threaten to 4 go ahead with a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of the Property. 5 If that foreclosure sale is consummated, plaintiffs will suffer 6 irreparable injury in the form of loss of the possessory and 7 certain ownership interests in the Property. Equitable relief 8 by way of injunction has long been available to protect g possessory rights in realty. Watts v . Spencer , 51 Or 262 , 268 , 10 94 P 39 ( 1908) . In addition, due to the uniqueness of each 11 parcel of real property, Robertson v. Jones, 280 OR 507, 511, 12 571 Ptd 905 ( 1977) , the foreclosure of plaintiff ' s ownership 13 interest in the Property cannot be compensated with money 14 damages . The threatened foreclosure sale also carries with it " 15 the substantial risk that the rights of third-party purchasers 16 to the Property will be interposed, so that no later judgment 17 restoring plaintiff to the Property will be adequate. 18 Finally, plaintiff ' s purpose in purchasing the 19 Property. was to run a 'halfway house for troubled youth which it 20 is: now. doing. . Such an enterprise only can be successful if it 21 can create an atmosphere of trust and a sense of permanency. 22 If plaintiff ' s are not even successful in providing these youth 23 with shelter, or if they are forced to relocated following a 24 foreclosure sale, that trust will have been lost and 25 plaintiff ' s purpose for purchasing the home will have been 26 destroyed. i, addition, plaintiff ' s license with the Oregon Page 3 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction MILLER NASO,WIENER,HAGE+"a CARLSEN A••omevs cnd Coumelon a,law lrleol+o— 5431 7;4.5e53 III 5 \t' ° •F A:r^ue °r'oM O•rar=':�e.3�co C � s YI C I Children' s Services Division would be jeopardized . These are 2 irreparable injuries : the law has no adequate remedy for such 3 harms; they cannot be compensated for with money damages . 4 2 . Plaintiff ' s Likelihood of Success on the Merits 5 The basis for the threatened foreclosure is a 6 declaration of default . The declaration of default is based 7 solely on plaintiff ' s setoff or deduction of the cost of 8 repairs and replacements , caused by defendant Allen ' s breaches 9 of the Earnest Money Agreement and other promises , from the 10 amount owed on the promissory note secured by the trust deed . 11 Thus, success on the merits in this case turns on the validity 12 of the declaration of default . That declaration ofdefault not 13 only was wrongful and without support in law or in fact ; it was 14 also a violation of defendant Callahan ' s duty as trustee . 15 It is well established that a vendor ' s 16 misrepresentations concerning the condition of the property 17 give the purchaser a cause of action for damages . Holland v . 18 Lentz, 239 Or 332 ,350, 397 Ptd 787 ( 1964) (vendor ' s 19 misrepresentation that the house was insulated entitled the 20 purchaser to recover damages) . This rule even extends to the 21 vendor ' s silence with respect to material matters that the 22 seller has an obligation to disclose. Millikin v . Green, 283 23 Or 283 , 285, 583 Ptd 548 ( 1978) (seller concealed faulty 24 condition of roof of new building) ; Ogan V. Ellison, 297 Or 25 , 25 68Z Ptd 760 ( 1984) (seller failed to mention that property was 26 illegally partitioned) . Page 4 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction PAILLEr. NASH.WIENER,HAGEP S CAPLSEN A rtw• evs ood Counselors or low TSI.oher ISC:7 s f 4 ,Y •r t'Mt.z These damages also include the cost of making 1 2 improvements or installing items that the vendor misrepresented 3 would be on the property. Pale_ v . Knoll , 69 Or App 372 , 4 384-386, 687 Ptd 1087 , rev denied, 298 Or 150 ( 1984) . Finally, 5 the purchaser is entitled to use the damages suffered as a form future payments to be paid to the 6 of credit against any 7 vendor . Kleiner v . Randall , 72 Or App 465 , 696 Ptd 556 ( 1985) ; 8 see also REAL PROPERTY (Oregon 1981 & Supp 1985) § 77 . 16 , 1985 9 supplement , at 77-5 . 10 As the attached affidavit of Barbara Hutsell shows , 11 the trust deed was given to secure a $20 , 000 balance on ttie 12 purchase price. plaintiff incurred $13 , 892 . 03 in expenses for 13 repairs and replacements due to defendant Allen ' s violations of the Earnest Money Agreement and other promises . It exercised 14 is 15 its right to credit that amount against the $20 , 000 balance , 16 and paid the remainder . This it was entitled to due . The 17 payment of the remainder after setoff was made in a timely 18 manner , and satisfied all the requirements for full and final 19 payment on the note. Thus, there was no basis on which 20 defendants could assert that- plaintiff was in default and 21 therefore there is no basis for the threatened foreclosure. 22 A recent Washington case is instructive, Cox v . 23 Helenius, 103 Wash 2d 383 , 693 P2d 683 ( 1985) . In that case, 24 the plaintiffs contracted for the purchase and installation of 25 a swimming pool at their home, at a cost of $9 , °85 . They 26 secured payment by granting a security interest in their home CPage 5 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of - Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction x. MILLER.HASH.v.IENER•HAGER L CARLSSN A•to•nevs cnd Cou�sro•s o•law S rlrotio _ 5 C2a coSE c.',t_ I in the form of a deed of trust . Shortly after installation the 2 plaintiffs suffered severe damage to their plumbing system as a 3 result of faulty installation . They notified the installation Y 4 company immediately, but the company failed to take any i 5 action. Plaintiffs spent several thousand dollars cleaning up 6 and trying to restore running water to their home. Because the 7 cost of repairs exceeded the balance due on the note secured by g the deed of trust , plaintiffs requested that the defendant g company reconvey the deed of trust and pay damages . They 10 withheld any further payments on the note . i 11 Defendant Helenius, attorney for the defendant 12 company/beneficiary and trustee under the deed of trust, 13 eventually commenced nonjudicial foreclosure by sending out a 14 notice of default . Despite the fact that Helenius was aware of 15 a complaint filed by plaintiffs seeking reconveyance of the 16 deed and in effect challenging any assertion of default , }ie 17 proceeded with the foreclosure sale and the home was sold for 18 $11,784 . In Cox, the Washington Supreme Court was reviewing a 19 judgment of the trial court setting aside the foreclosure. Its 20 basic holding was simply stated: 21 "We hold that the suit brought by the grantor [seeking reconveyance and damages] prevented the 22 trustee' s initiation of foreclosure, making the sale void. We further hold that the trustee breached his 23 duties . " 24 The court ' s reasoning in Cox was based on the 25 trustee' s position as one owing a fiduciary duty to the trustor 26 as well as the beneficiary: CPage 6 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction MittER.NASH.WIENER,HAGER L CAVLSEN A++omevs and Co—w-s of L,,- '74-SE F ow77a.SE5E 1 " [A] trustee of a deed of trust is a fiduciary for both the mortgagee and mortgagor and must set 2 impartially between them * * * . See Blodgett v . Martsch, 590 Ptd 298 302 (Utah 1978) ( 'duty of the 3 trustee under a trust deed is * * * to treat the trustor fairly and in accordance with a high q punctilio of honor ' ) . " 5 693 P2d, at 686-87 . 6 The court also noted that because "the deed of trust 7 foreclosure process is conducted without review or confirmation 8 by a court , the fiduciary duty imposed upon the trustee is 9 exceedingly high. " 693 P2d at 686 . That duty includes the 10 responsibility to " ' take reasonable steps to avoid sacrifice of 11 the debtor ' s property and his interest . '" 693 P2d, at 687 12 (quoting McHugh v. Church, 583 P2d 210, 219 (Alaska 1978) . 13 The extensive damage to plaintiffs ' property "put the 14 very issue of default into question. " 693 P2d , at 687 . The 15 trustee had actual notice of the complaint . For these reasons , 13 the court concluded that the trustee should have "delayed 17 foreclosure until resolution of the underlying dispute . " 18 Ibid. In fact, the trustee ' s failure to do so not only was a 19 breach of his duty as a trustee, but the court suggested that 20 it may have been a violation of DR5-10.5(B) for Helenius to 21 continue as trustee and attorney for the beneficiary in the 22 fact of an actual conflict of Interest . 23 The Cox case is remarkably similar to the case at 29 bar. The high fiduciary duty of a trustee under a deed of 25 trust applies in Oregon as well as Washington. See Harper v . 26 Interstate Brewery Co. , 168 Or 26, 120 P2d 757 ( 1992) . Like { Page 7 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction MILLE PNASH,V.`IENED.HAGEC a CACLSEN A110'evs ono Cou-selo•s v Low Teleol+one,.,C?I:ia_L055 r. . ( 1 Cox, this case involves a trustee who had notice of the 2 complaint filed by the trustor seeking to enjoin the sale and 3 in effect challenging the validity of the declaration of 4 default . Defendant Callahan' s duty as a trustee obligated him 5 to delay the sale until resolution of the underlying dispute. 6 He has refused to do so , in violation of his fiduciary duties 7 to plaintiff . ' 8 3 . The Balance of Harm Tips Heavily—in Favor of Plai•ntif f . 9 whether to issue An important factor in determining 10will the injunction is the degree of harm that each party 11 suffer as a result of the issuance or not of the injunction. 12 In York v. Stallings , 217 Or 13 , 22 , 391 Ptd 529 ( 1959) , the 13 Oregon Supreme Court indicated that a court may in its 19 discretion refuse an injunction when the hardship caused to the 15 defendant by the injunction would greatly outweigh the benefits 16 resulting to the plaintiff . In this case, by contrast , the 17 balance of harm tips heavily in favor of plaintiff . 18 If the injunction issues , the only harm to defendants 19 is that they will not receive payment of the amount allegedly 20 21 22 ' The Washington Supreme Court , relying on DP.5-105(B) , suggested that it was a violation of that disciplinary 23 rule for a lawyer to continue as trustee of a deed of trust and as counsel for the beneficiary, at least when 24 actual conflict surfaced, such as the filing of a complaint by one party to the deed against the other . 25 Oregon' s DR5-105 (B) is essentially the same as that applied in Cox; defendant Callahan' s conduct in this case 26 may well constitute a violation of that disciplinary rule. CPage 8 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction rnRlF� NaSti.VAENE7.M4_E4 L CFRLSEN A••o•ne rs c^c Ccuntrlo•S cl lo+•' • . ... !.4 .. a ... .^_ _ .. v j 1 in default during the pendency of this action--an amount that t 2 plaintiff contends is not owed. Even if it is subsequently 3 determined to be owing, defendants will be reimbursed with 4 interest . The requested injunction will not result in any 5 other legitimate harm to defendants . 6 By comparison, the benefit of the injunction to 7 plaintiff is great . It stays a foreclosure sale that is 8 founded on a wrongful declaration of default , thereby 9 preserving plaintiff ' s very substantial interest in the 10 Property until resolution of the underlying dispute about 11 default . It prevents the interposition of the rights of third 12 party purchasers asserting claims inconsistent with plaintiffs ' 13 claim of entitlement to reconveyance of the trust deed. The 14 injunction allows plaintiff to go forward with its business 15 without operating under the threat of foreclosure . 16 4 . The Public Interest Favors Issuance of the Injunction. 17 A final element that factors into a court ' s analysis 18 of whether to issue the preliminary injunction is the public 19 interest. See Martin v International Olympic Committee, 740 20 F2d 670 , 674-75 (9th Cir 1984) . ' In this case, the public 21 22 z The Martin court was analyzing the power to issue a 23 preliminary injunction in terms that apply broadly to the common-law power of state courts, as well as the authority 24 of federal 'courts. In that same vein, the Martin court also noted that a preliminary injunction also may issue if 25 the moving party establishes that — serious questions are raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in his 26 favor . "' 740 F2d, at 679-75 (quoting William Inglis & Sons Page 9 - Memorandum. of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction r.+1tlE Q.HASH.`ti'EJEP..HLG:�LCL%LSE � eno•�ers vc CounsNo•s o•lcr+ 111 .. C:.4 L. a•.r .r 1 interest overwhelmingly favOls issuance of the injunction . Tile in the 2 requested injunction would promote the public ' s interest 3 stability of land titles . By utilizing the process of losure, conducted without review or 4 nonjudicial forec 5 confirmation by a court , defendants ' attempted foreclosure sale f 6 in the face of a challenge to the very issue of default could j i 7 only result in an unstable title and further litigation. 8 The public interest also favors an adequate 9 opportunity for interested parties to prevent wrongful �! 10 foreclosure. It is this policy that has given rise to the I 1r 11 various equitable doctrines that limit foreclosure, such as the 12 right of redemption and statutory rights to cure . See, e .g . , !I 13 ORS § 86 . 753 . In the normal case, trust deed foreclosures 14 adequately protect against wrongful foreclosure by providing a i5 statutory right to cure the default prior to the sale , as well j 16 as the requirement of notice. In addition, the status of the 17 trustee as a fiduciary both to the beneficiary and the trustor lg should operate to prevent wrongful foreclosure . But where the lg very issue of default is placed in question, then the statutory 20 right to cure default is of no value . If , in addition, the 21 22 ' Continued 23 Baling Co v . ITT Continental Baling Co . , 526 2d 86, 88 (9th Cir 1975) . Plaintiff contends that it has satisfied 24 all of the prerequisites for issuance of a preliminary injunction under the test utilized in the text , supra , and 25 that it even more clearly has satisfied this alternative test mentioned in Martin . 26 C.• Page 10 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff ' s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction hu LIE R.MASH.>.:-ErIER•HAGER b CA�LSEN A vo• e vs er_Co It,,o-s o•law Tl1'nn.:5:31.:L.re5C 111 � .. i[. ... .. C•ra_ _.•'._ r " 1 trustee refuses to delay the sale until the underlying dispute C_ 2 is resolved, then the trust deed system' s protection against 3 wrongful foreclosure breaks down. The only recourse is for a 4 court to enjoin the sale. 5 Finally, in this case the public interest is involved f 6 because the party seeking protection against wrongful 7 foreclosure is a charitable organization. Plaintiff provides a- � g t valued-::public service running a halfway house. The requested 9 injunction allows that work to go forward during the pendency 10 of this suit , without the disastrous effect that a 11 holiday-season foreclosure would have on the youth who live 12 there. CONCLUSION 13 14 For all of the above reasons , a preliminary injunction 15 should issue enjoining notice of sale and the foreclosure sale 16 threatened by defendants . 17 MILLER, NASH, WIENER, HAGER & CARLSEN 18 19 Michael w. 14o- in 20 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 Q. Page 11 - Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff 's Motion fora Preliminary Injunction MILLER,NASH,WIENEP.,HAGEQ&CAOLSEN A•'omeys and Counselor C.Low Teleoho,e 77a.S!SS 1!1 S C: i.r.h A.e^.e r"�-^d ^•eac- ':;d.;t:7 1 I hereby certify that I served the foregoing and .authorities in support of plaintiff' s 2 memorandum of points 3 motion for a preliminary injunction 4 5 on: Mr. James M. Callahan 6 Suite B-2 11825 S.W. Greenburg Road 7 Tigard, Oregon 97223 8 Attorney for Defendants 9 10 11 12 13 by delivering to said attorney a full , true and correct copy C14 thereof . I further certify that said copy was contained in a addressed as above stated, the last-known 15 sealed envelope, attorney, and delivered to said address on the 16 address of said 17 17th day of December 1986 . 18 19 Michael W. Mosman 20 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 C! Page i MILLER,HASH,Ya ENEP,HAGEo b CAPLSEN i A,twney%and Co-melol%W low '- Teleoho,e t5:M 22x•5858 111 $ F.,a,A . u. Op•'1on!1 O.eoo '2�-26c0 . j.T�t� • . - 1 1 t � �I --IE OREGONIAN,THURSDAY,JUNE 12,1986 ® 4M MW5 ..T �.�`•��•�Sw��i;�:.?.'•^,�.EG�~y :� New house i Tigard. expands youth facility By ROBERT OLMOS said. of The Oregonian staff The Progress Rotary has adopted METZGER—The big yellow house Cordero House,which houses 12 boys, r.n.rrr.. gs_Ir,- • for troubled youth here_soon will be as one of its"pet projects"and recent• .:r•-`•«• �+.•.�� _�-.+c.r•-• ..-�: i'-��i JoiQed by an equally big'`sister"liouse_ ly presented the house with an Ameri- .-,-,•r.L.•-..Fr.• :�•.+'•r.: m.,,,�,::.i—•�"�-�.••t-�-.•'^ •i innearbyTigard. can flag. The club also donated funds ' The house here, on the corner of so that new clothes dressers could be Southwest Locust Street and 82nd purchased for the boys' rooms. Also, Avenue, is called the Cordero House the club will donate material for and has been serving delinquent youth repaneling the home's entryway. Ince 1972. The club also sponsors a"kid of the The house to be opened in Tigard' month" program, whereby a resident wnrTe the Damascus House, nio`ved to of Cordero House is invited to a �- •--. its new'SotitNwest Greenburg•Road Progress Rotary breakfast,where Fe is location from Ledar Mill, and due to honored and given a dictionary as a � ,, . .. `:• ;.�,. :� �; _ i open In August. gift. r: r `-..- 'T`I^' The homes are part of the Washing- The tQ thS who come to Cord ton County Janis youth programs. and Damas ware "kids in irouhJe: Barbara Hutsell. program manager utsell said. Some have faced a high for the youth programs,said housing at incidence of "drug and alcohol abuse the Cedar Mill shelter home has been with their families or selves, or both," limited to five youngsters,but that the % said Ilutsell. Some are referred by (new home easily could house 10. ) Juvenile courts or they come_o-die -Hutseil`described tie s 61iir home homes by way of the FfacLaren School., as"the only one of its kind in the coun• vs,where sta�c fi I Or try_ ty." It serves as a shelter for boys ing o reduc thp nnnulation: The ■""�"��" betty:-• the ages of 14 and 17 who omes operate under contracts with `,r' need child protective services. Boys the state Children's Services Division. stay there for only 60 days for evalua• Every year,Cordero House sponsors tion by a professional staff that deter- a picnic for neighbors. " mines where a more permanent place- "Last year, only one neighbor -�.--r.3' •.^_-���i`:�...,,,^ ter. .... ;•, '.�._ ment will be made. came,"said Hutse(I. �c T • Cordero House is a residential treat. The program director said she hypes '►��►.•- '• :�` ment center,where boys stay from six more neighbors come to this year's plc- !_ �-•'rr',,� to nine months. They attend school nic, which will be held later in the ,r,.. R :,• . �•,, ,. classes under sponsorship of the Tigard summer, so that they may learn more wL School District, which provides a about the program and get to know the teacher and a teacher aide, Hutsell young residents. i . �;�•,'.a ... .. - � _ •� ... M_ ..� �- .. i� ; .. .. ... ._ a eLr.-.�..s- . t • 4{4 r 1` !( 4 F: I Memo - Janis Youth Programs, Inc. (M16-86) Page 2 The shelter run by Janis is intended to provide temporary housing and care for youths between the approximate ages of 12 and 18. The number currently residing in the building varies, but it appears to range between 5 and 12. This operation is licensed by the State. The building is with the R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) zone and " re-ap care residential" is listed as a permitted use and "group residential" is listed as a conditional use. The Community Development Code contains the following definitions in Section 18.42.020(a): (5) ;;Group Residential Refers to the residential occupancy of living units by groups of more than five (5) persons who are not related by blood, marriage, or adoption, and where communal kitchen/dining facilities are provided. Typical uses include occupancy of retirement homes, boarding houses, cooperatives, and half-way houses, but excluding group care facilities as specified in (6) below. (6) Group Care Residential Refers to services provided in facilities authorized, certified, or licensed by the State to provide board,' room, and provide care to six or more physically disabled, mentally disordered, mentally retarded, handicapped persons, dependents or neglected children; but excluding those use classified under hospitals. Typical uses include, intermediate care facilities and institutions for the mentally regarded and physically handicapped. The staff determined that "group care residential" applied in this case because of the child care and the State licensing requirement. Chapter 18.120 of the Code indicates what types of development are subject to Site Development Review. 18.120.020 Applicability of Provision (a) Site Development Review shall be applicable to all new developments and major remodeling of existing developments exce t it shall not apply to: (1) Single family detached dwellings; (2) A duplex, which is not being reviewed as part of any other development; or (3) Any remodel that involves 5096 or less of the . total square footage of the existing structure, or 50% or less of the exterior wall surface. t i • I ' I 3 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 16, 1987_ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Streets System PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Discussion Development Charges Credit January 19 1987 PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan f DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council eliminate the streets system development charges procedure? _ t€ INFORMATION SUMMARY p Is On January 19, 1987, the City Council discussed various methods to utilize streets system development charges (SDC) . The Council chose to eliminate the SDC credit procedure contained in Sectin 3 .20.070 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The attached ordinance eliminates the credit process effective May 1, 1987. i f f ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED { 1. Approve the ordinance as written. t 2. Modify the ordinance and adopt the revised ordinance. 3. Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION The staff suggests that the City Council approve the attached ordinance Celiminating Streets SDC credits on May 1, 1987. /br3063P i MEMORANDUM ' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i i T0: Members of the City Council March 16, 1987 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, ^ Community Development SUBJECT: Streets System Development Charges Credit On January 19, 1987, the Council discussed the streets system development charge credit procedure contained in Section 3.20.020 of the TMC. The Council directed staff to prepare a revision to the ordinance eliminating the credit effective May 1, 1987. Council action was based upon a decision to have all SDC monies go to Capital Improvement Projects. The Council also expressed a desire to hold open the option of contributing funds from SDC's to local improvement districts. During the discussion, the staff cautioned that the present fee of $600 may not be sufficient for CIP purposes if the Council does allocate funds to future LID'S. The attached ordinance removes the credit procedure effective May 1. Any C credit requests pending prior to that date will be processed through the City Council in the coming months. /br3063P C '. HCL,,d HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN PORTLAND _--__ 15555 S.W.BANGY ROAD, SUITE 30 ------ - - -- • LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 503/684-1680 THE HOUSING CENTER -------------------------- ----____ 1 March 18, 1987 Mr. William A. Monahan Director, Community Development City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bill: Thank you for the opportunity to review the options now being weighed by the Tigard City Council regarding the city's considered, development charge. rge. AsaTigard is chtaking suchissues rather than a crisis management" Among the four options presented in your January 12 memorandum, our recommendation would be to adopt Option "D", keeping the system development charge at its current level and eliminating the credit policy. Several factors contribute to this recommendation: 1) As your memo points out, this approach causes the least disruption to the city's capital improvements plan. Thus, the city will be better prep ared to address long-term capital needs, and not have its program subject to variations in funding thatcare even wider than the variations caused by struction market itself. 2) As your memo also noted, Tigard' highest tetherstate, and-fees cost is already among the and a higher fee would make the city less attractivet numbers builders. If you've watched the building p ermit lately, you'll have noticed that the largest-volume jurisdiction in the Portland metro area is now Clark County. One reason is fees, which are substantially lower there (SDC's are prohibited by state law in Washington.) A related and important problem is the difficulty such high front-end fees are causing for builders' cash flow. Tigard, like most jurisdictions, requires e that .fees nd SDC's be paid before issuing a building pt �. Con- struction lenders, on the other hand, will not release f i I `s Page 2 the first draw until after construction has begun, r usually after the foundation is poured. Thus, the builder finances the fees and other start-up costs out of his or her own pocket. For the builder who starts two or three houses in a short period (which often happens, even for smaller-volume builders, be- cause of our short dry season) , the cash-flow problem becomes serious. 3) Credit systems, through equitable in theory, aren't very efficient in practice. Developers who have re- ceived such credits often find that they cannot increase their lot prices to reflect the credit and to recover their expenditures. And builders respond better to a "level playing field" than to a momentary "windfall" in the form of a lot-specific credit when it comes to keeping their sale prices competitive. This is particularly true in Oregon, where in residential construction, developers usually don't build homes. For these reasons, we plan to ask Washington County to change its credit system to a refund of developers' costs under the county's Traffic Impact Fee program. In the county, however, fees are already high enough and volume great enough to allow such refunds. So, if it is necessary for Tigard to take one of the steps you've described, the one which would have the least impact on housing cost would be Option Again, thanks for involving us in the consideration of these options, and I hope our input will be helpful. Sincerely, Charlie Hales Director of Governmental Affairs i I I � y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY — (CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD) AGENDA OF: March 23, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 16 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorize PREVIOUS ACTION: Engineering Contract for 135th/ MurrayLID PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole GZ o— DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Approval of the contract for engineering services for the 135th/Murray L.I.D. INFORMATION SUMMARY In order for the 135th/Murray L.I.D. to stay on schedule, design work needs to begin in April. If the Council indicates a desire to proceed with the LID following the public hearing on March 16th, we will be requesting the Contract Review Board to approve the consultant contract for design at the March 23rd meeting. The contract is being prepared and will be available for review prior to the March 23rd meeting. Design work could then commence as soon as we receive LID approval from the Board of County Commissoners. County action is scheduled for March 24th. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the contract as submitted. 2. Direct that the contract be revised. 3. Re3ect the contract. FISCAL IMPACT Fees are being negotiated and will be shown in the contract. SUGGESTED ACTION Approval of the contract. The consultant will not be authorized to proceed until the County has approved the LID formation. /br3068P i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Contract Review Board March 23, 1987 FROM: Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer SUBJECT: 135th/Murray LID Engineering Services Contract On March 23rd the Council will be considering whether to proceed with the LID. If the decision is to proceed, we have set a goal of being under construction by August. In order to meet the goal, design must begin immediately. Therefore, we will be asking the Contract Review Board to Approve the attached contract with Robert E. Meyer Consultants for engineering ices. Meyer is the consultant who prepared the Preliminary Engineering Report for the LID. Their work so far has been very thorough and professional. The selection process for the preliminary engineering report involved review C of the qualifications of all consultants who had shown an interest in street design work. From that review, four consultants were selected as best qualified for this particular LID project. Each of the four consultants were requested to submit a proposal and all four responded. Based on the proposals received, I judged Meyer to be the firm best qualified for this particular project. Factors considered included technical abilities, reputation, ability to provide clear public presentations, understanding of the project, freedom from any conflicts of interest in the 135th/Murray area, and fee schedule. The attached contract provides for disign and construction staking at a lump sum fee of $ 212,500.00 Engineering and inspection services during construction would be furnished on a time and materials basis, as the amount of services required is dependent upon the construction time, weather and the contractor; the estimated additional cost is $ 42,100.00 When expressed as a percentage of the project cost, these fees are about the same as those on the Dartmouth LID and less than those on other recent street LID projects. The contract amount is within the amounts estimated in the preliminary engineering report. If the LID formation is approved, I will recommend approval of the attached contract by the Contract Review Board. RRW:cn/0986W Attach. r 1 a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES C CONTRACT TITLE: 135th Avenue/Murray Boulevard Local Improvement District CONTRACT NO. i This Contract, made and entered into this day of March 1987 , by and between ti.a City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of the state of Oregon, hereinafter called "City" and (full name and address of person or firm) Robert E. Meyer Consultants Inc. 4805 S.W. Griffith Drive Suite 100 Beaverton. .OR 97005 hereinafter called "Contractor", duly authorized to perform such services in Oregon. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City requires services which Contractor is capable of providing, under terms and conditions hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, Contractor is able and prepared to provide such services as City does hereinafter require, under those terms and conditions set forth; now, therefore, CIN CONSIDERATION of those mutual promises and the terms and conditions set forth hereafter, the parties agree as follows: 1. Project Description. Contractor's services under this Agreement shall consist of the following: a. Contractor shall perform personal services, as outlined in the project proposal dated the 19th day of March , 1987, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The project for which services are to be provided is known as 135th Avenue/Murray Boulevard LID 2. Compensation. A. The City agrees to pay the Contractor for performance of those services provided herein at the rates described in the attached proposal, which payment shall be based upon the following applicable terms: 1. Contractor shall submit monthly billings showing the services completed to date and payment due. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 1 t 2. Payment by the City shall release the City from any further obligation for payment to Contractor for service or services performed or expenses incurred as of the date of the statement of services. Payment shall riot be considered acceptance or approval of any work or waiver of any defect therein. 3. The City certifies that sufficient funds are available and authorized for expenditure to finance costs of this contract. B. All work performed by the Contractor under this Agreement shall be the property of the City. 3. Contractor Identification. The Contractor shall furnish to City its employer identification number, as designated by the Internal Revenue Service, or Contractor's Social Security number, as City deems applicable. 4. City's Representative. For purposes hereof, the City's authorized representative will be the City Engineer, 13125 SW Nall Blvd. , P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223; (503) 639-4171. 5. Contractor's Representative. ( For purposes hereof. the Contractor's authorized representative will be David H. Sandstrom 4605 SW Griffith Drive, Suite 100_ Beaverton OR 97005 6. City's Obligations. In order to facilitate the work of the Contractor as above outlined. the City shall furnish to the Contractor access to all existing information which is in the City's possession concerning the location of sewer and water lines and other utilities or structures which affect the planning and construction of the proposed improvements. 7. Contractor Is Independent Contractor. A. Contractor's services shall be provided under the general supervision of City's project director or his or her designee, but Contractor shall be an independent contractor for all purposes and shall be entitled to no compensation other than the compensation provided for under paragraph 2 of this Agreement. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 2 B. In the event Contractor is to perform the services described in this Agreement without the assistance of others, Contractor hereby agrees to file a joint declaration with City to the effect that Contractor's services are those of an independent contractor, as provided under Chapter 864 Oregon Laws 1979. C. Contractor acknowledges that for all purposes related to this agreement, Contractor is and shall be deemed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of City, shall not be entitled to benefits of any kind to which an employee of the City is entitled and shall be solely responsible for all payments and taxes required by law; and furthermore in the event that Contractor is found by a court of law or an administrative agency to be an employee of 'Che City for any purpose, City shall be entitled to offset compensation due to demand repayment of any amounts paid to Contractor under the terms of this agreement, to the full extent of any benefits or other remuneration Contractor receives (from City or third party) as a result of said finding and to the full extent of any payments that City is required to make (to Contractor or to a third party) as a result of said finding. D. The undersigned Contractor hereby represents that no employee of the City of Tigard, or any partnership or corporation in which a City employee has an interest, will or has received any remuneration of any description from the Contractor, either directly or indirectly, in connection with the letting or performance of this contract, except as specifically declared in writing. 8. Subcontracts — Assignment & Delegation. A. Contractor shall submit a list of subcontractors for approval by the City, and Contractor shall be fully responsible for the acts or omissions of any subcontractors and of all persons employed by them, and neither the approval by City of any subcontractor nor anything contained herein shall be deemed to create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and City. B. This agreement, and all of the covenants and conditions hereof, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Contractor respectively and their legal representatives. Contractor shall not assign any rights nor delegate any duties incurred by this contract, or any part hereof without the written consent of City, and any assignment or delegation in violation hereof shall be void. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 3 9. Contractor' s Employees Medical Payments. The Contractor agrees to pay promptly as due, to any person, copartnership, association or corporation furnishing medical, surgical, and hospital care or other needed care and attention incident to sickness or injury to the Contractor's employees, all sums which the Contractor agreed to pay for such services and all monies and sums which the Contractor collected or deducted from employees' wages pursuant to any law, contract or agreement for providing or paying for such services. 10. Early Termination. A. This Agreement may be terminated without cause prior to the expiration of the agreed upon term by mutual written consent of the parties and for the following reasons authorized by ORS 279.326: 1. If work under the Contract is suspended by an order of a public agency for any reason considered to be in the public interest other than by a labor dispute or by reason of any third party judicial proceeding relating to the work other than suit or action filed in regard to a labor dispute; or 2. If the circumstances or conditions are such that it is impracticable within a reasonable time to proceed with a substantial portion of the Contract. B. Payment of Contractor shall be provided by ORS 279.330 and shall be prorated to and include the day of terminati•,n and shall be in full satisfaction of all claims by Contractor against City under this Agreement. C. Termination under any provision of this paragraph shall not affect any right, obligation or liability of Contractor or City which accrued prior to such termination. 11. Cancellation for Cause. City may cancel all or any part of this Contract if Contractor breaches any of the terms hereof or in the event of any of the following: Insolvency of Contractor; voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy by or against Contractor; appointment of a receiver or trustee for Contractor, or an assignment for benefit of creditors of Contractor. Damages for breach shall be those allowed by Oregon law, reasonable and necessary attorney's fees, and other costs of litigation. 12. Access to Records. City shall have access to such books, documents, papers and records of Contractor as are directly pertinent to this Agreement for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcripts. C CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 4 r Z 13. Force Maieure. f ( Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default because of any delays in completion of responsibilities hereunder due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence on the part of the party so disenabled, including, but not restricted to, an act of God or of a public enemy, volcano, earthquake, fire, flood, epidemic, quarantine, restriction, area—wide strike, freight embargo, unusually severe weather or delay of subcontractor or supplies due to such cause; provided that the party so disenabled shall within ten (10) days from the beginning of such delay notify the other party in writing of the causes of delay and its probable extent. Such notification shall not be the basis for a claim for additional compensation. 14. Non—Waiver. The failure of the City to insist upon or enforce strict performance by Contractor of any of the terms of this contract or to exercise any rights hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its right to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any future occasion. 15. Warranties. All work shall be guaranteed by the Contractor for a period of one year after the date of final acceptance of the work by the Owner. Contractor warrants that all practices and procedures, workmanship ( andmaterials shall be the best available unless otherwise specified in the profession. Neither acceptance of the work nor payment thereof shall relieve Contractor from liability under warranties contained in or implied by this contract. 16. Attorney's Fees. In case suit or action is instituted to enforce the provisions of this contract, the parties agree that the losing party shall pay such sum as the Court may adjudge reasonable attorney's fees and court costs including attorney's fees and court costs on appeal. 17. Applicable Law. This contract will be governed by the laws of the State of Oregon. 18. Conflict Between Terms. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the proposal of the contractor, this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the said terms of said proposal conflicting herewith. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 5 19. Indemnification. Contractor agrees to indemnify and to hold-harmless the City, its Officers, Employees and Agents against and from any and all loss, claims, actions, suits, including costs and attorneys' fees, for or on account of injury bodily or otherwise, to, or death of persons, damage to or destruction of property belonging to City, Contractor or others, resulting from, arising out of, or in any way connected with Contractor's sole negligence. 20. Insurance. Prior to starting work hereunder, Contractor, at Contractor's cost, shall secure and continue to carry during the term of this Contract, with an insurance company acceptable to City, the following insurance: A. Public Liability and Property Damage insurance with limits of not less than $500,000.00 for personal injury, $500,000.00 for damage to property, $500,000.00 comprehensive automobile liability and $250,000.00 for broad form property damage coverage. Such insurance shall cover all risks arising directly or indirectly out of Contractor's activities or work hereunder, including the operations of its subcontractors or any tier. Such insurance shall include provisions or endorsements naming City, its Officer, Employees and Representatives as additional insureds, provisions that such insurance is primary insurance with respect to the interests of the City and that any other insurance maintained by City is excess and not contributory insurance with the insurance required hereunder; cross-liability or severability of interest clause; and provisions that such policies shall not be cancelled or their limits of liability reduced without thirty (30) days prior notice to City. A copy of each insurance policy, certified as a true copy by an authorized representative of the issuing insurance company, or at the discretion of City, in lieu thereof, a certificate in form satisfactory to City certifying to the issuance of such insurance shall be furnished to City. B. Workman's Compensation from the State Accident Insurance Fund or from a responsible private carrier. Private insurance shall provide the schedule of employee benefits required by law. C. Professional liability Insurance. The Contractor shall have in force a policy of Professional Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than $500,000.00. The Contractor shall keep such policy in force and current during the term of this contract. D. Adequacy of Performance. Any insurance bearing on adequacy of performance shall be maintained after completion of the project. Should such insurance be cancelled before the end of the guarantee period and the Contractor fails immediately to procure other insurance as specified, the City reserves the C right to procure such insurance and to charge the cost thereof to the Contractor. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES - PAGE 6 f r i 21. Complete Agreement. i This contract and any referenced attachments constitute the complete agreement between the City and Contractor and supercedes all prior written or oral discussions or agreements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized undersigned officers, acting pursuant to a motion of the City [, Council acting as the Contract Review Board, duly passed at the Regular Meeting held on the day of , 19 , and the contractor has executed this Agreement on the date hereinabove first written. CITY OF TIGARD BY: Date BY: CONTRACTOR BY: Date BY: RRW:cn/0985W CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 7 ANUM 4805 S.W.Griffith Drive,Suite 100,Beaverton,OR 97005 Robert E.WeyerConsultants,nS+ultants,I 0e. (503)643.7531 9200-87-22 ��+ March 19, 1987 Randall Wooley City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Proposal for Engineering Services Murray Boulevard / 135th Avenue LID Dear Randy, Thank you for asking us to submit this proposal for engineering services for the design and construction of the Murray Boulevard and 135th Avenue LID improvements. This proposal contains the following sections: 1. Project Description 2. Scope of Work 2.1 Basic Services 2.2 Additional Services 3. Owner's Responsibility 4. Payments to Engineer 5. Schedule 6. Authorization 7. Exhibits B, C and D 1. _Project Description This proposal is based upon the detailed project description and design criteria in the Preliminary Engineering Report, dated February 6, 1987, by Robert E. Meyer Consultants, Inc. A brief description of the project includes the following: 1.1 MURRAY BOULEVARD * Construct to City of Tigard standards as a Major Collector, from Walnut Street to Scholls Ferry Road,a distance of approximately 2,800 feet. * Street section to include 44' width between curbs, asphaltic concrete paving, sidewalks on both sides, street lighting, storm drainage, pavement marking and signing and limited improvements for water, sanitary sewer, power and telephone. * Scholls Ferry Road widening for turn lane at Murray Boulevard intersection. s h Engineering• Planning• Surveying• Landscape Architecture 'j rr 1.2 135TH AVENUE 1 . Construct to City of Tigard standards for a Minor Collector, from an intersection with Murray Boulevard to Scholls Ferry Road, a distance of approximately 3,700 feet. Street section to include 40' width between curbs, asphaltic concrete paving, sidewalks on both sides, storm drainage, street lighting, pavement marking and signing, power, telep"kione and limited improvements for sanitary sewer, water and cable. Construct bridge over Summer Creek 2. Scope of Work The following scope of work is based upon Engineering Services for design and construction of the proposed improvements for both Murray Boulevard and 135th Avenue under the formation of a single LID. : 2.1 BASIC SERVICES 2.1.1. Meet with Client Review project requirements for design, bidding and construction. Review and establish detailed project schedule. Collect data as needed. 5 2.1.2. Control and Topographic Surveys # CONTROL SURVEY x * Tie all existing monuments necessary to establish existing and proposed street centerline and right-of-way. * Set and tie points for horizontal and vertical control for a photogrammetric topographic survey of the streets. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Topographic Surveys for design will be accomplished by a combination of aerial photogrammetry and field survey methods. All survey data will be tied into the City of Tigard's horizontal and vertical control networks. -' Aerial photogrammetry will be used to produce a topographic manuscript at a scale of P= 201, with one foot contour lines. Elevations are expected to be within 0.2 feet. * Additional topographic field surveying will be performed in areas where a high order of accuracy is needed for design, and in treed areas not adequately covered by the photogrammetric survey. This will include critical curb, pavement and driveway elevations; existing utilities, as marked by utility companies; and, depths to buried utilities, as "pot-holed" by others. We recommend that existing �y buried utilities be exposed at critical locations for control of vertical road alignment. f 9200-87-22 Page 2 of 12 2.1.3. Subsurface Investigation r A subsurface investigation will be peformed by L. R. Squier Associates, Inc., Geotechnical Consultants, to develop recommendations for design and construction of Murray Boulevard, 135th Avenue and the bridge over Summer 4 Creek. Field work will include the following: a) Test pits consisting of 7 to 9 excavations ranging in depth from 5 to 15 feet. b) Four observation wells in selected test pits to measure depth to a ground water table. c) A single boring to a depth between 40 and 50 feet, or to practical refusal of the drilling equipment used, near the proposei center of bridge span. Engineering studies and analyses will be accomplished that will lead to the preparation of conclusions and recommendations concerning: a) earthwork, including site preparation and the placement and compaction of fill; b) estimated settlements; c) pile foundations as necessary; including pile types, capacities, installation criteria; d) subdrainage requirements; e) stability of cut/fill slope; and, f) pavement section(s). 2.1.4. Traffic Engineering Traffic engineering services by Robert Keech, P.E., Inc., will include the following: Projection of pavement load (20 year 18 kip single-axle equivalency and traffic coefficient. a) Refine traffic flow projections. b) Determination of truck traffic composition. c) Determination of Tri-Met activity. d) Tabulation of pavement loading. * Construction traffic control signs. a) Prepare 1" - 100' plan sheet showing construction signing (1) b) Prepare typical construction sign plan sheet Permanent traffic control signs and markings. a) Prepare 1" - 50' or 1" - 40" plan sheet for each street segment, showing permanent traffic control (1) C 9200-87-22 Page 3 of 12 2.1.5. Preliminary and Final Design BRIDGE a) Hydraulics A hydraulic study will be performed using the Corps of Engineers, HEC-2 computer program for analyzing the 100 year flood surface profile at the bridge site. A bridge opening configuration will be developed that will satisfy FEMA's regulatory requirements for a "no-rise" condition. Recommendations and supporting calculations will be sent to FEMA for approval. b) Structural Based upon the bridge opening required to meet hydraulic requirements, a bridge will be designed to provide a 40 foot street width, plus sidwalks and railings on both sides. The structure is expected to be a pile supported, prestressed concrete, single span bridge. c) Permits A joint permit application will be made to the Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. Final plans will incorporate requirements of these agencies. The permit application will be submitted as soon as possible, prior to completion of final design, to provide the time needed for the permit process to be completed prior to construction. * 135TH AVENUE AND MURRAY BOULEVARD Preliminary and final plans will be prepared for construction of 135th Avenue and Murray Boulevard. a) Establish horizontal and vertical alignment to meet design standards and to minimize impact on existing utilities, driveways and construction costs. b) Meet with property owners directly impacted by proposed improvements, to coordinate design of driveway adjustments and landscape restoration. c) Coordinate design of intersection at 135th Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road with ODOT and City of Beaverton, so that alignment is compatible with the extension of 135th Avenue to the north. d) Coordinate with public and private utility companies for installation and for relocation of utilities including telephone, power, street lighting, cable, water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and natural gas. e) Determine sidewalk alignments and delineate areas to receive landscape treatment. f) Specify treatment for designated landscape areas. g) Evaluate and make recommendations for construction phasing. h) Prepare plans for both temporary and permanent pavement markings and signing. C ' 9200-87-22 Page 4 of 12 * SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD WIDENING Widening of Scholls Ferry Road at the proposed intersection with Murray Boulevard is anticipated for construction of a new left turn lane. We will provide engineering services for this project including topographic survey, preliminary and final design. Design will be coordinated with the City of Beaverton and ODOT. Prepare opinion of probable cost for construction for the various project elements. * Prepare Contract Documents and specifications for construction. All project elements will be included in a single set of Contract Documents. Separate bid schedules will be prepared, as required. Meet with City of Tigard on a regular basis throughout the design phase to keep the City informed on progress and to review design decisions. Obtain approvals to proceed with bidding and construction phase. 2.1.6. Bidding and Contact Award Assist City of Tigard with obtaining bids and selecting contractors for construction including: C Preparation of bid advertisement * Attend pre bid meeting # Answer questions during bidding * Attend bid opening * Review bids and recommend award of contract Assist with contract award * Issue Notice to Proceed 2.1.7. Right-Of-Way Survey * Following the final determination of the right-of-way alignment, MEYER will furnish a legal description of each parcel of land to be acquired by the City as additional right-of-way. MEYER will also furnish a legal description for each slope and/or temporary construction easement required for the completion of this project. A map will accompany the descriptions for each tract affected. * Prior to construction, MEYER will tie and reference all existing monuments likely to be destroyed during construction. These monuments will be tied to the control survey performed during the preliminary survey phase of work. * Upon the completion of construction, the above referenced monuments will be reset. Monuments will also be set at all centerline curve and angle points. Where the right-of-way line does not run parallel with the centerline, right-of-way angle points and curve points showing the new alignment and all monuments found and set will be filed with the Washington County Surveyor. 9200-87-22 Page 5 of 12 2.1.8. Construction Survey MEYER will provide a constuction survey for S.W. Murray Boulevard and S.W. 135th Avenue,consisting of one set each of the following items: Establish project bench marks at appropriate intervals. * Slope stakes at top of bank or toe of fill at 501+ intervals. Subgrade stakes at 501+ intervals on each side of roadway. Ditch grading stakes at 501+ intervals. * Storm sewer pipeline and catch basin stakes at intervals as requested by the contractor (501+ intervals,average). Sanitary sewer pipeline stakes at proposed street crossings. Water pipeline stakes at proposed street crossings. Horizontal and vertical control stakes for the location of piles and pile caps together with slope stakes to define the new channel at Summer Creek Bridge. * Curb stakes at 251+ intervals on each side of roadway and at quarter points at all curb returns. * An "as-built" survey locating all items not constructed as per original plan. 2.2. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 2.2.1. Contract Administration During the Construction Phase, ENGINEER shall provide Contract Administration as follows: 2.2.1.a Consult with and advise OWNER and act as his representative as provided in Articles 1 through 17, inclusive, of the Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract No. 1910-8, NSPE/ACEC (1978 edition). The extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilites and authority of ENGINEER as assigned in said Standard General Conditions shall not be modified, except as ENGINEER may otherwise agree in writing. All of OWNER's instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER, who will have authority to act on behalf of OWNER to the extent provided in said Standard General Conditions, except as otherwise provided in writing. The Standard General Conditions shall be modified as follows: Article 11 Change of Contract Price 11.2. Change: "All claims for adjustment in the Contract Price shall be determined by ENGINEER if OWNER and CONTRACTOR cannot otherwise agree on the amount involved." To Read: "All claims for adjustment in the Contract Price shall be reviewed by the ENGINEER. �3 The ENGINEER's recommendation shall be presented to the OWNER for review and approval. 9200-87-22 Page 6 of 12 Article 12 Change of the Contract Time 12.1. Change: "All claims for adujestment in the Contract Time shall be determined by ENGINEER if OWNER and CONTRACTOR cannot otherwise agree." To Read: "All claims for adjustment in the Contract Time shall be reviewed by the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER's recommendation shall be presented to the OWNER for review and approval." 2.2.1.b Make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the executed work of Contractor(s), and to determine, in general, if such work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. ENGINEER shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of such work. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s) or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s). ENGINEER's efforts will be directed toward providing a greater degree of confidence to OWNER that the completed work of contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents, but ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the failure of Contractor(s) to perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. During such visits and on the basis of on-site observations, ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work, shall endeavor to guard OWNER against defects and deficiencies on such work and may disapprove or reject work failing to conform to the Contract Documents. 2.2.1.c Review and approve (or take appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings (as that term is defined in the aforesaid Standard General Conditions) and samples, the results of tests and inspections and other data which each Contractor is required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents (but such review and approval or other action shall not extend to means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto); determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contactor(s); and receive and review (for general content as required by the Specifications) maintenance and operation instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of inspection, which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract Documents. 9200-87-22 Page 7 of 12 2.2.1.4 Issue all instructions of OWNER to Contractor(s); issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents, and in connection therewith, prepare change orders as required; have authority, as OWNER's representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work; act as initial interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the acceptability of the work thereunder and make decisions on all claims of OWNER and Contactor(s) relating to the acceptability of the work, of the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Doucments pertaining to the execution, and progress of the work; but ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or decisions rendered by him in good faith. 2.2.1.e Based on ENGINEER's on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedule, determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts; such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, that, to the best of the ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a Projrct upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contact Documents, z and to any qualifications stated in his recommendation), and ' that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractor(s); but by recommending any payment, ENGINEER will not thereby, be deemed to have represented that continuous or exhaustive examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of the work or to review the means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, or that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interest or encumbranceF or that Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2.2.1.f Conduct an inspection to determine if the Project is substantially complete, and a final inspection to determine if the work has been completed in accordance with the Contract Document, and if each Contractor has fulfilled all of his obligations thereunder so that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to each Contractor and may give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice shall be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 2.2.1.e. 9200-87-22 Page 8 of 12 After the final project cost has been established, prepare a final report summarizing the project costs and prepare a final assessment roll. 2.2.1.g ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or ommissions of any Contractor, or subcontractor, or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractors' agents or employees or any other persons (except ENGINGEER's own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise performing any of the contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.2.1.f thru 2.2.1g, inclusive, shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liablilty for failure to properly perform duties undertaken by him in the Contact Documents. 2.2.1.h Record Drawings will be prepared upon completion of construction. One set of reproducible mylars will be provided for the OWNER. 2.2.2. Construction Observation 2.2.2.a If requested by OWNER or recommended by ENGINEER and agreed to in writing by the other, a Resident Project Representative will be furnished and will act as directed by ENGINEER in order to assist ENGINEER in observing performance of the work of Contractor(s). 2.2.2.b The duties and responsibilities and the limitations on the authority of the Resident Project Representative and assistants will be set forth in Exhibit B, which is to be identified, attached to and made a part of this Agreement before such services begin. 2.2.2.c Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in progress, and field checks of materials and equipment by the Resident Project Representative (if furnished) and assistants, ENGINEER shall endeavor to provide further protection for OWNER against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractor(s); but the furnishing of such resident Project representation will not make ENGINEER responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions of programs, or for CONTACTOR(s)' failure to perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2.2.2.4 If OWNER designates another person to represent OWNER at the Project site who is not ENGINEER's agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other person and the effect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER under this Agreement will be set forth in an Exhibit that is to be identified, attached to and made a part of this Agreement before such services begin. 9200-87-22 Page 9 of 12 2.2.3. Testing During Construction Testing during construction will be performed by Carlson Testing, Inc. Testing will be performed to determine whether workmanship and materials used to construct this project are in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. Testing will include the following: (Refer to Exhibit D) * Earthwork Aggregate compaction Asphaltic concrete gradation and compaction Concrete compressive strength for P.C.C. curbs, sidewalks and bridge construction. 3. Owner's Responsibility OWNER shall: 3.1 Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of all design and construction standards which OWNER will require to be included in the Drawings and Specifications. 3.2 Assist ENGINEER by placing at his disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. 3.3 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to perform his services. 3.4 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals, and other documents presented by ENGINEER, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination, and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER. 3.5 Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others, as they be necessary for completion of the Project. 3.6 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project, including any that may be raised by Contactor(s), such auditing services as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the moneys paid to him 9200-87-22 Page 10 of 12 under the construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule or regulation applicable to their performance of the work. 3.7 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to ENGINEER's services. 3.8 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of ENGINEER's services, or any defect in the work of Contractor(s). 3.9 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 3. 4. Payments To The Engineer Payments to the ENGINEER are proposed as follows: 4.1 BASIC SERVICES For items 2.1.1. through 2.1.8. outlined under the Scope of Work, Basic Services Section, we propose the following Lump Sum fees: Lump Sum Fee 135TH Avenue do Murray Boulevard $192,000.00 Summer Creek Bridge 13,500.00 Scholls Ferry Road Widening At Murray Blvd. 7,000.00 TOTAL LUMP SUM FEE FOR BASIC SERVICES $212,500.00 4.2 ADDMONAL SERVICES We propose to perform Additonal Services at our standard hourly rates plus expenses at cost in accordance with the attached Schedule of Hourly Rates, Exhibit C. r: 9200-87-22 Page 11 of 12 For budgeting purposes, we have prepared the following estimates of costs that may be incurred during a 15 week construction period. *Contract Administration Labor $15,000.00 Expenses 500.00 Total $15,500-00 *Construction Observation Labor $21,000.00 Expenses 700.00 Total $21,700.00 **Testing During Construction Labor & Expenses $4,900.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL SERVICES $42,100.00 * Exhibit C, Schedule of Hourly Rates for Robert E. Meyer Consultants, Inc. ** Exhibit D, Schedule of Hourly Rates for Carlson Testing, Inc. The actual amount of Additional Services will be dependent upon the length of the construction contract time, weather, and the contractor. Based upon the above, the total estimated fees are $254,600.00. 5. Schedule Basic Services items 2.1.1 through 2.1.5 can be completed 14 weeks from date of ENGINEER's receipt of authorization to proceed. 6. Authorization This proposal may be attached as Exhibit A, to the City of Tigard's standard contract form. Work may be authorized in phases, beginning with Basic Services and following with Additional Services, as needed. We look forward to working with you on this important project. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, RO RT E. MEYER CONSULTANTS, INC. David H. Sandstrom, P.E. Civil Engineer Dept. Head DHS/vv Enclosures 9200-87-22 Page 12 of 12 Exhibit B to Agreement Between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services, dated , 19 (for use with No. 1910-1, 1979 Edition). Duties, Responsibilities and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative A. General. Resident Project Representative is ENGINEER's Agent,will act as directed by and under the supervision of ENGI- NEER,and will confer with ENGINEER regarding his actions.Resident Project Representative's dealings in matters pertaining to the on-site Work shall in general be only with ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR, and dealings with subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge of CONTRACTOR. Written communication with OWNER will be only through or as directed by ENGINEER. B. Duties and Responsibilities. Resident Project Representative will: 1. Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and schedule of values prepared by CONTRACTOR and consult with ENGINEER concerning their acceptability. % 2. Conferences: Attend preconstruction conferences. Arrange a schedule of progress meetings and other job conferences as required in consultation with ENGINEER and notify those expected to attend in advance. Attend meetings,and maintain and circulate copies of minutes thereof. 3. Liaison: a. Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with CONTRACTOR,working principally through CONTRACTOR's superinten- dent and assist him in understanding the intent of the Contract Documents.Assist ENGINEER in serving as OWNER's liaison with CONTRACTOR when CONTRACT'OR's operations affect OWNER's on-site operations. b. As requested by ENGINEER, assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details or information, when required at the job site for proper execution of the Work. 4. Shop Drawings and Samples: a. Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples,receive samples which are furnished at the site by CONTRACTOR,and notify ENGINEER of their availability for examination. b. Advise ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR or its superintendent immediately of the commencement of any Work requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER. S. Review of Work,Rejection of Defective Work.Inspections and Tests: a. Cenduct on-site observations of the Work in progress to assist ENGINEER in determining if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and that completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents. b. Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any Work is unsatisfactory, faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents,or does not meet the requirements of any inspections,tec!s or approval required to be made or has been damaged prior to final payment:and advise ENGINEER when he believes Work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for observation,or requires special testing,inspection or approval. c. Verify that tests, equipment and systems startups and operating and maintenance instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents and in presence of the required personnel,and that CONTRACTOR maintains adequate records thereof:observe,record and report to ENGINEER appropriate details relative to the test procedures and startups. d. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these inspections and report to ENGINEER. ©1979 by National Society of Professional Engineers,2029 K St..N.W..Washington,D.C.20006 NSPE/ACEC/ASCE Publication No. 1910-1-A 1979 Edition 6. Interpretation of Contract Documents: Transmit to CONTRACTOR ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents. 7. Modifications: Consider and evaluate CONTRACTOR's suggestions for modifications in Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER. 8. Records: a. Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence,reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples submissions, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders,field orders,addi- tional Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents,progress reports,and other Project related documents. b. Keep a diary or log book,recording hours on the job site,weather conditions,data relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of visiting officials and representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors, daily activities,decisions,observations in general and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures.Send copies to ENGINEER. c. Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all CONTRACTORS, subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and equipment. 9. Reports: a. Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the Work and CONTRACTOR's compliance with the approved progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing submissions. b. Consult with ENGINEER in advance of scheduled major tests, inspections or start of important phases of the work. c. Report immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident. 10. Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with CONTRACTOR for compliance with the established procedure for their submission and forward them with recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of values, Work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incor- porated in the Work. 11. Certificates.Maintenance and Operation Manuals:During the course of the Work,verify that certificates,maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and furnished by CONTRACTOR are applicable to the items actually installed;and deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior to final acceptance of the Work. 12. Completion: a. Before ENGINEER issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion, submit to CONTRACTOR a list of observed items requiring completion or correction. b. Conduct final inspection in the company of ENGINEER,OWNER and CONTRACTOR and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected. c. Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to ENGINEER concerning acceptance. C. Limitations of Authority. Except upon written instructions of ENGINEER, Resident Project Representative: 1. Shall not authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents or approve any substitute materials or equipment. 2. Shall not exceed limitations on ENGINEER's authority as set forth in the Contract Documents. 3. Shall not undertake any of the responsibilities of CONTRACTOR,subcontractors or CONTRACTOR's superintendent, or expedite the Work. 4. Shall not advise on or issue directions relative to any aspect of the mzans, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction unless such is specifically called for in the Contract Documents. S. Shall not advise on or issue directions as to safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. 6. Shall not authorize OWNER to occupy the Project in whole or in part. 7. Shall not participate in specialized field or laboratory tests. Prepared by Enpueri Joint contract Doeoments Committee Published jointly by:Professional Engiaeen in Private Practice.a practice division of the Nation)Society otProfessional Engineers:American coasukm{Engineers Councii;American Society of Gvil Engineers EXHIBIT C _ ROBERT E. MEYER CONSULTANTS, INC. January, 1987 Standard Hourly Rates For Services PRINCIPAL $ 75.00 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER $ 55.00 DESIGN ENGINEER $ 48-50 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN $ 35-40 SURVEYOR $ 45.00 ARCHITECT $ 45.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $ 36-40 DRAFTSPERSON $ 34-36 SURVEY FIELD CREW (2-MAN) $ 54-60 SURVEY FIELD CREW (3-MAN) $ 78-85 RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE $ 33-36 WORD PROCESSOR $ 22.00 CLERICAL $ 20.00 * AS APPROVED BY THE CLIENT AND WHEN THE PROJECT REQUIRES WORK OUTSIDE THE NORMAL 8 HOUR DAY, 40 HOUR WEEK, SATURDAY, SUNDAY, OR LEGAL HOLIDAY BILLING WILL BE 1.50 TIMES THE AMOUNT SHOWN. TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT WORD PROCESSOR $ 10.00 COMPUTER $ 35.00 EDM -ELECTONIC DISTANCE MEASURING $ N/C TOTAL STATION - INCLUDES CAD $ TO NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 1.05 X ACTUAL COST GEOTECHNICAL / SOILS LABORATORY TESTING 1.05 X ACTUAL COST Page 1 f EXHIBIT C ROBERT E. MEYER CONSULTANTS, INC. January, 1987 OTHER COSTS - SUPPLIES, REPRODUCTION, MILEAGE, COPIES & MISCELLANEOUS POLYESTER FILM (MYLAR DRAFTING MATERIAL) $ .60 PER SQ FT SEPIA PER SQ FT $ 1.60 PER SQ FT BLUELINE PRINTS: 22 X 34 PER SHEET $ 1.00 30 X 42 PER SHEET $ 1.25 XEROX COPIES PER SHEET $ .08 MILEAGE CAR - PER MILE $ .30 SURVEY TRUCK - PER MILE $ .40 SURVEY MATERIALS STANDARD STAKES - PER STAKE $ .25 IRON RODS - PER ROD $ 2.00 OUTSIDE REPRODUCTION 1.05 X ACTUAL COST PHONE CHARGES 1.00 X ACTUAL COST � POSTAGE & SPECIAL HANDLING 1.00 X ACTUAL COST FILE RECORD SURVEY 1.00 X ACTUAL COST Page 2 k EXHIBIT "D" - Construction Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. C P.O.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)684-3460 March 13, 1987 Robert E. Meyer Engineers 4805 S.W. Griffith Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Attn: Dave Sandstrom Re: Inspection and Testing Services 135th Street LID Gentlemen: We offer our services for structural inspection and testing for the above referenced project at our standard unit rates as follows: 1. Shop and/or field inspection services . . . . . . . . . .$ 25.00/hour 2. Overtime: time in excess of 8 hours per day on project site - Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. . . . . . 35.00/hour 3. Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Charge 4. Concrete Test Cylinders, Cubes, Prisms. . . . . . . . . . 10.00/each 5. Laboratory Proctor Test - per material type . . . . . . . 100.00/hour a. Nuclear Densometer Technician . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.00/hour 6. Rice Density Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.00/each 7. Asphalt Extraction-Gradations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55.00/each The above listed services and tests are those most frequently requested. Prices will be furnished upon request for items not specifically covered herein. Based upon available information, we estimate a total cost of $4,835.00 for all inspection and testing services for this project. We stress that this is only an estimate and is to be used for informational purposes only. It should in no way be considered a "tight" bid. Our staff consists 'of City of Portland licensed special inspectors holding multiple certification as well as AWS certified welding inspectors and NDT technicians. CWe thank you for this opportunity to quote and hope to be of service to you on this significant project. EXHIBIT "D" Very truly yours, CARLSON TESTINI,:IN 0lz'.� Douglas W. Leach President llo CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23, 1987_ DATE SUBMITTED: March 13, 1987_ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Sewer Service PREVIOUS ACTION: to Parcel 21 of LID #42 PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wool ;Z DEPT HEAD OK !r ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Provision for connection of Parcel 21 to the sewer in Local Improvement i District No. 42. _ INFORMATION SUMMARY On February 23rd, we discussed the difficulties in obtaining an easement necessary to provide a sewer connection to Parcel 21 in LID 42. The Council directed staff to meet with property owners and report back on March 23rd. A meeting was held with property owners and they are considering the available options. At the March 23rd Council meeting, we will report on any progress. " ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED C FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION This will be a progress report only. We are not yet ready to propose formal action. /br3057P C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �r- MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 16, 1987 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administratory J SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY l/ Per Council's suggestion, I'll begin preparing a monthly Executive Summary instead of the quarterly. I' ll use the Executive Summary to update Council on the major Council Goals outlined in the Policy Calendar, and secondly to inform Council briefly on the Departmental Issues that might be of potential aste horough au reports ase this lbefore, this ng further nfrepo t information. Since ben haven't a bit longer than subsequent months. COUNCIL GOALS: 1 . Transportation Program. City Engineer, Randy Wooley, continues to be in the lead on this goal area. Staff recruitment for the Transportation Engineer authorized last fall by Council is in process. Consulting Engineers have also been brouCht into the process for specific projects. Two main Local Improvement District projects underway are 135th/Murray and the Dartmouth Street L.I.D. 's. We hope to stay on schedule and begin construction yet this spring or summer on both projects. The 18-month Capital Improvements Project list should be available for Council review in April for the Spring, Summer and Fall projects. The 18-month C.I.P. list will be available for budget purposes. 2. Community Involvement. Community Services Director, Jill Monley, has met with Council Members and is beginning to pick up the activity in the Board and Committee areas. We hope to begin discussions on the NPO expansion this summer. A Boardsmanship Workshop is planned for May with an advanced Boardsmanship Workshop for the Fall. 3. City Center Plan. Appointments to the City Center Task Force are scheduled for late March or early April. Staff and PSU continue their data gathering and research projects. A written work plan for this goal is yet to be developed. 4. Comp Plan Update. Bill Monahan and I are yet to develop the work plan. 5. Sanitary Sewer Plan and C.I.P. Engineering recruitment authorized by Council last fall is in process. Randy Wooley hopes to begin work on the sanitary sewer master plan yet this spring, leading to public facility plan adoption this fall and C.I.P. approval this time next year. 6. Economic Development Action Plan. The Economic Development Committee Resolution is being revised. New appointments to the Committee should be eds to be developed. in place this month. A new work program then ne 7. Storm Drainage Master Plan. A Wastewater Engineer authorized by Council last fall has not yet been hired. The storm drainage planning effort will follow the general sanitary sewer planning goal. 8. Municipal Services Policy. Jill Monley and I will begin working on some draft materials this Summer for Council discussion this Fall. A work plan and study session schedule needs to be developed. 9. Sign Code Program. Bill Monahan needs to develop a work plan schedule. 10. Annexation Policy. Jill Monley and I hope to discuss this with Council at the April workshop, resulting in draft documents this Summer and Council approval of policy and code revisions this Fall. In addition to the 1987-88 Council Goals, there are a series of continuation goals yet to be completed by the Administration yet this fiscal year. o Parks Plan and C.I.P. The Park Plan is well underway and scheduled for Council discussion with the Park Board this May and adoption in June. C.I.P. development and approval will occur over the course of the Summer and adoption in the Fall. We need to decide whether we want to have Debbie Knechtel continue as the Parks Planner in this assignment through the Summer or not. o Community Events. The City is prepared to support the proposed 4th of July fireworks, Cruisin' Tigard and Christmas lighting events as they develop during the year. o Library W.C.C.L.S. The W.C.C.L.S. Continuation Levy is scheduled for March. The computerization program continues to come on—line. Access /87 continues. o Municipal Court Study. Jill Monley is prepared to take the lead with the Municipal Court study over the course of the Summer, leading to recommendation to Council this Fall. The Court Section, City Attorney, Municipal Judge and Police Department will be involved in the study. Discussion have also begun with the County regarding possible absorption of Justice Court into the City's Municipal Court. o Records Study. A comprehensive outline of a multiyear records management program is being prepared. Any staffing changes necessary to implement that can be discussed in the context of the 1987-88 Budget. o Five Year Financial Plan and Services Plan. Pending the outcome of the Metzger annexation, we will need to update the City's Five Year Financial Plan, Staffing Plan and Service Level Plan. I would hope for a Council Study Session in May and approval in June. o Compensation and Benefits. Annual adjustments for FY 1987-88 need to be completed prior to June. Matrix studies are coming in now showing total compensation median market positions on Management, Police and General Employees. We also have a survey of Council compensation. The discussion f of Council flexible benefits will be addressed over the course of the Summer with recommendations to Council this Fall. o Personnel Rules. Community Services Director, Jill Monley, and I haves begun pushing the Personnel Rules. We hope to have a Council Study Session in May with adoption in June effective July 1 and the start of the new Fiscal Year. o Labor Relations. The TPOA arbitration scheduled for mid—March; need a Council Study Session in April on the TMEA/OPEU upcoming negotiations. Any compensation adjustments for management group will be discussed with Council this Summer and adjusted this Fall. { Other related issues, not directly of a Council or administrative goals I nature, are also ongoing. o Budget. Departmental budget requests are currently being prepared. The City Administrator will prepare the proposed budget the first week of April and submit the propopsed FY 1987-88 budget to the Council and Budget Committee in late April and early May for hearings. Adoption needs to occur in June. i o Interqovernmental Relations. The Mayor is now actively involved in the i JPACT transportation issues. Council needs to decide who is going to represent the City on the various legislative issues in Salem affecting the City. Councilor Eadon and I will work out attendance at the MACC cable communications meetings. A general clarification of roles and responsibilities needs to occur at the April Study Session. o Study Sessions. Council needs to identify and prioritize those topics it wishes to set for particular study session time and the amount of time on Ceach topic. I have sent out a memo asking for suggestions in this regard. DEPARTMENTAL ISSUES: Library: o W.C.C.L.S./Cable TV--We are having some difficulty with our data transmission to the Tigard Library over the cable TV lines for the W.C.C.L.S. computer. MACC is aware of it and working on it. o Personal Computers—for public use and staff use will shortly be delivered to the Tigard Library. One is a MacIntosh and the other is an IBM compatible. The City had budgeted funds for these with 50 percent match from the Friends of the Library. o W.C.C.L.S.—discussions are underway trying to find a way to minimize the central administrative costs in order to maximize the per circ distribution to each member library. This is critical to keeping Beaverton in support of the March levy and in order to have us get E our revenue targets under the five year financial plan. F i Police Department/Public Safety: C o I have asked Chief Lehr to prepare a current status and alternative summary on 9-1-1 issues for Council review. ' r i R o The Washington County Consolidated Dispatch Center is having some difficulties and some changes going on with fire district dispatch. CWe are largely unaffected but monitoring. o Ambulance Services—The County has just issued its rules on Advanced Life Support (ALS). We are monitoring the fire district and ambulance company issues in this regard. o Police Service Contracts—Sherwood discussions are still pending. o District Court—Discussions are going on with the cities and the i County. We hope to get two new District Courts for Washington County. We are trying to get one of othe District Courts located on the east side. This could save Court overtime and transport time. o Police Reorganization—Memo is being prepared by the Chief for distribution in late March. Community Services o The Salary Survey and Matrix Updates--In final review and ready for Council Study Session. o The City has been approached by Denny Derby regarding annexation of the Street of Dreams. If Council wishes to proceed with this by Council Resolution, action should be taken before there are any voters or residents to contend with. Staff will bring this issue to the Council April Study Session for review. o Annexation Laws—Being reviewed in the Legislature. Jill is coordinating with a Metro Managers Committee in this regard. o Justice Court—The City has been approached by the County about the possibility of taking over Justice Court and merging it with Municipal Court. Jill is reviewing. o Records Study—Loreen has prepared the draft sequencing the records program, sending it to Council. o Customer Services Counter—The staff shares Council's concern about the cold feeling of the lobby and the lack of a customer services focus. The remodel suggestions in this regard are being brought to Council Monday night, 3-16-87. o Phone Systems--Study is on hold (no pun intended). We will pick up in the context of the budget. o Computer Master Plan—The Finance Director, Wayne Lowry, and the Computer Users Steering Committee are updating the Computer Master Plan for C.I.P. scheduling purposes. o Court Study—This is tentatively scheduled for this summer. o Temporary Part-time Help—Continues to be used within budget authorizations to keep up with current workloads. Specific suggestions in this regard will be addressed in the budget context. E J- o Personnel Rules—are being put to the front burner and will hopefully ( be ready for adoption this June. o Golden Key Apartments--Owners have approached the City and favor annexation. Staff recommends that this occur as an island annexation w in July, assuming a successful South Metzger annexation. April discussion? o Island Annexations—Staff recommends that Council discuss this at the April Study Session and initiate island annexations this July. o Bi-Weekly Payroll--Would be to the City's advantage to shift to a bi-weekly payroll schedule. Most employee groups tend to favor; the Police Union is somewhat resistant. We are continuing to review the possibility of a change from twice monthly to every two weeks. o N.P.O. Role Redefinition—Jill is starting to work on this area and will be discussing this with Council. We hope to get into it with the N.P.O. 's over the course of the Summer, changing them from a Neighborhood Planning Organization focus into a Neighborhood Participation Organization dealing with more than just planning issues. City Administration o Business Taxes--The Legislature continues to hold Hearings on exempting builders and realtors from paying local business taxes. I have been working with the League of Oregon Cities in this regard, C but have refrained from going to Salem pending further clarification from Council. o Roads Study—The State/County/City Comprehensive Roads Finance Study is in the Legislature. The City staff has not gone to Salem, pending clarification from Council as to representation on legislative issues. o Boundary Commission—The repeal of the Boundary Commission, the exemption of Washington County from Boundary Commission authority and changes on the Boundary Commission's authority regarding the incorporation of new cities have all been suggested as bills and hearings have been conducted in the Legislature. Mayor Brian was able to attend but was not allowed to testify on this measure. o Current Year Budget—The current year budget is trending at or slightly below (about 2 percent below) budgeted amounts, essentially on schedule. We are currently preparing a revenue update for the current year budget. o FY 87-88 Budget—Preparation efforts are under way. o Update to the Five Year Financial Plan and Staffing Plan--Is scheduled the end of March or early April, pending the outcome on the South Metzger Annexation. It would be my intent to use Brian Hartung as an Administrative Assistant for about one week to assist on this project (very low profile, in house). i f 4 f E E o City Attorney's Priority List_—Has been reviewed by Tim Ramis and myself. The list is attached. Priority 1 is high and 3 is low. ' Community Development o Hall 4treet Improvements—For Council information, prior City e State Co—unci ls and staff have had an informalHualderstand Streetlnup wtohanhinterim that the State would attempt to bring ity would consider assuming street standard and at that time the Street. responsibility for Hall Street as a City o Plumbing Inspector---We were not successful in recruiting a Building Inspector who was also a Plumbing Inspector. With Ed Walden's retirement this June we will be looking contract relationship with Lake Oswego for all plumbing inspections than single family residents, which current staff can inspect. O Active Plannina--The Community Development Director 1 possibility of expanding conversations with the County regarding the the City's Active Plan and by contrast including building, planning, engineering services within the City's area of interest. This issue needs to be discussed further at some point with Council. The County is generally interested, but nothing immediate. he Group Care and Home Occupations Issues--Continue tooccur t o Leislature where City authority in this regard is beingpreempted by State Statute. Ma'or Structural Ins ection Services--We may need to contract for o ion with a consulting engineer firm if the major structural inspect Lincoln Center area is annexed to the City for tede activity. do Lincoln Center III. This would be a fee suPe not have anyone on staff who would be available to inspect a project of this size. O Spring Clean—Up--With the garbage haulers is scheduled for May 2nd. Bill will be sending a memo to you in this regard. O Waymire and Dover Landing--Ken Waymire has asked that the City give him a rebate on his storm drainage SDC's for some extra capacity a condition of development. Staff has storm drains in his project as advised him that the City does not have a storm drainage rebate policy. We however do feel there is some amount of extra capacity beyond what might normally be his extra capacity requirement. We are examining the possibility of sharing in that cost as a C.I.P. project. Council approval would be necessary. O I-5 Association—The City Staff continues to be involved with various I-5 Association activities. O Westover/Boyce Storm Draina e—Council has received a memo from Phil Westover concerning storm drainage problems in the McDonald area. This is an area that was developed under County rules. It looks like the storm drainage is under—sized. It may require a capital project improvement. Consultant engineer has been retained to take a look at the issue. O Maxim' s Ditch—Tony Maxim called and complained about a storm property which has not been cleaned out. drainage ditch behind his Staff is looking into it as a maintenance item. U Stress Claims--We have two employees w2 her back to workstresso are out on claims and Chuck j We are working with Trudy Belcher to g Condon may be onto a long—term disability. Jill is working with LGPI on the management of Stress Claims generally. Legislation may be needed. O Street Lights—The publicity over the assumption of street lighting costs in the Metzger community has prompted several recent requests from existing Tigard neighborhoods for new lights. The City does not have a written policy regarding new street light installations. nstallferentions.ugPast policy has been that neighbors showing a strong even consideration at the neighborhood for street lights would be g budget time for new installations. A written policy needs to be developed in this regard. o Metzger Park—The City has been contacted by the County regarding possible contract maintenance of Metzger Park. This is on hold until after the South Metzger Annexation. Luxury Theater Complex Proposal in the Tigard Triangle—We have o received a preapplication in this regard. Traffic studies are under way. It is a permitted use in the zone. If Council has questions or concerns, please contact Bill Monahan or Keith Liden. o PublicWorks Operations Superintendent—Recruitments are under way. cting capacity as Operations The Streets Crew unief is in the A Superintendent. ng nts o T.A.G. Bricks--Mayor Brianhas enwhereSethef bricks coforalthe from citizens wanting to Courtyard. Apparently there is some difficulty getting the brick manufacturer to schedule the imprint of the bricks. o Parks Landsca in at the Civic Center--This project is completed within the funds that have been authorized. Any additional work will require either supplemental appropriation this year or funding to complete the project in the next budget year. o Chelsea Park Access—The builder has indicated he is willing to dedicate an easement and improve it to his property line, providing access to the Downtown Fanno Creek Park, if the City will complete the trail system connecting into the Park. Council has called this up for Plan review. OLincoln Center—The City has had specific discussions with the County and with the Tigard School District regarding possible purchase of some property from the school for the extension of Lincoln Street if the Lincoln Center project goes forward and is annexed to the City. o Target's Sign--The Target Department Store folks have gone forward with their sign variance from the County and if subsequently annexed apparently would not need any additional OK's from the City. o Leron Heights Private Sewer—This is in the process of legal close-out. The City will be notifying Allen Patterson in this regard. Building and City Attorney are in the lead. o Sight Clearances--The Code issue of sight clearances will be discussed with Council in an upcoming Executive Session. o Sign Code Enforcement—This will be discussed with Council in an upcoming Executive Session. o Water District Building—The Water District continues to go forward with its plans for constructing an office and shops complex at the corner of Hall and Burnham. The District has been advised that this ! is not in compliance with City code and may come before Council i before a Building Permit is issued. o City Shops Clean-up (Mt. Tigard)—The City needs to continue to budget funds annually for the removal of street sweeping and sewer line cleaning debris from the shops area. i o Flec:t Management—The City's aggressive preventive maintenance program has been pretty well underway this last year. We are hoping to move with the new computer system into a more comprehensive fleet ( management program starting this summer. o Metzqer and the Metro Housinq Rule—Annexa taion of Metzger to Tigard will not impact the current Metzger or current Tigard densities. Metzger is OK at its current five units to the acre plan densities and does not have to increase to Tigard densities if annexed. Tigard is looking now at an average of ten units to the acre and does not have to pick up any difference in increased densities if we annex Metzger. Once annexed, the Metzger and Tigard combined average will be around nine units to the acre total City density. These density issues deal with buildable lands only and do not affect existing density. o Non-Remonstrance—This issue needs to be set for Council discussion at some point in the future. The enforceability is in question. o Janis Youth Non-Remonstrance—The City expects Janis Youth to apply for non-remonstrance agreement on the recently conditioned improvements. Council needs to consider whether they are willing to take the risk of ever getting the improvement or not. o Building and Grounds Maintenance—Comprehensive review of Civic Center, Old City Hall and the Senior Center maintenance requirements is being pulled together both for capital needs and O & M needs for the budget. BJ:mh (1336p) cc: Executive Staff t TO: Library Board (IrOREGON 0F T11A� City Council' FROM: Library Director SUBJECT: Monthly Report, February 1987 25YeorsofSendce 1961-1986 WCCLS: The Washington County Board of Commissioners (BOC) voted to approve a $2.6 million operating levy for three years to be placed on the March 31 , 1987 ballot. They also endorsed the Structure and Governance Committee recLmmendation for legislation that would allow formation of a cooperative model for delivery of county-wide library services. This recommendation was written into proposed legis- lation and forwarded to the legislature. The Capital Needs Committee continues t work on the RFP for a consultant. At a meeting on February 23 city managers, librarians and county staff met to discuss the services contract for 1987-1990 under the proposed levy. On March 9 the group will meet again to discuss the changes which were suggested and the budget. Automation: The new date to go "on-line," that is circulation of materials, has been set for March 17. The collection data entries should be nearly complete and a majority of our patrons will be registered. Temporary help had to be maintained through February. Detection Svstem: The system has been disconnected and a dedicated line is to be installed. Volunteers: Fifty-nine (59) volunteers gave 502.5 hours; daily average 21.8 hours. Three (3) community assignees worked 32 hours. Library Board members gave 9 hours. Amnesty: In an effort to retrieve long overdue books and answer the demand for available materials, the library declared an amnesty (no fines) for overdue material. There is no way to assess the result, but it can be surmised that some books returned which might not otherwise and the publicity never hurts. Computers for Public: After soliciting quotes three personal computers, one Apple II E, one Macintosh and one Tandon P.C. (IBM clone) , were ordered for use by the public. This includes printers and basic software. A policy for use is being developed and this program will require staff monitoring. It is planned that the staff will use one of the computers for certain library tasks. Friends of the Library donated $2500, almost half the cost. Let's Talk About It: Discussion leaders are being trained for the Let's Talk About It series being presented in March and April. Publicity for the media, in-house notices and fliers have been developed, sent out and/or displayed. Youth Services: Kids Talk Books program (CATV) , involving 20 children, was completed February 7. Produced by Metropolitan Area Cable Commission and WCCLS, the program will be shown over the public access channel in March and April. -Historical materials from the Washington County Historical Society were used for a program celebrating Oregon's birthday. - Quotes for the Neva Root puppet stage came in too high, ($500), but two local retired woodcrafters have volunteered to donate their labor to produce a puppet theater for the children's area. - Two classes on Creative Storvtell.inb Teci,nique were presented to Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY - MONTHLY REPORT - February, 1987 - page 2 High School child development classes. - Donations for purchasing children's t books continue at a modest rate. i Work Indicators February 1987 February 1986 t Adult Materials 7631 6508 Juvenile Materials 4767 3147 TOTAL 12,398 _ 9,655 Days of Service 21 .5 20 Average Daily Circ 577 483 Hours of Service 198 186 Books Circulated per hour 63 60 Increase/Decrease Circ 287 11% Reference/Readers Advisory 535 460 Books in Use in Library 2263 1197 Materials Added/Withdrawn 362/1 644/0 Borrowers: Registered 684 387 Storytime (# of sessions) 272 (13) 130 (9) Speical Children's Programs (sessions) 107 (13) 124 (6) C ~ MEMORANDUM (V, a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council march 12, 1987 FROM: Jill Monley, Community Services Director�� SUBJECT: February, 1987 Monthly Report The highlight of the month seems to be the bond sale closing on February 24. All the appropriate documents were signed and the transaction was closed. The City will save $247,000 over the life of the bonds! Last month's South Metzger efforts paid off in the Boundary Commission's approval of the proposal. Staff has worked with two consultants for a total salary/compensation study for bench marked positions. A telephone training/usage program has been initiated wherein a specific extra function of our phone system is focused on each month. We believe by maximizing the use of each telephone instrument that this will relieve some of the burden on other staff at the same time providing the best service to citizens. This month is "Call Forwarding Options"! We recruited for a Court/Records Manager which included an all—day assessment center. Nadine Robinson was the successful candidate and began employment here on February 9, 1987. dc:1328p i t b MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley March 5, 1987 FROM: Doris Hartig SUBJECT: February '87 Monthly Report Heavy rains and bad weather caused the sewer to backup and damage two properties. Two people attended the noon brown bag lecture on the heart. This was scheduled by the Safety and Wellness Committee. This Committee is discussing holding fire drills and having a training class for City employees on the use of fire extinguishers. Staff has worked with two consultants for a total salary/compensation study for bench marked positions. An "RFP" has been prepared and reviewed with the Employees Assistance Committee. Proposals will be mailed in March. In preparation for the March hearing information/fact gathering for TPOA arbitration has been continuing. Irene's time for February has been divided: 45% accounting; 47% for personnel, and 8% processing P.O. 0621W/0009W C WORK LOAD INDICATORS Feb. 86 Feb. 87 Expenditure Reimbursement Requests Processed 0 89 Purchase Orders Processed 49 68 Recruitments 0 4 Hires 6 5 Terminations 2 1 Unemployment Claims 0 2 Claims Filed: Workers Compensation 1 0 0621W/0009W C ' � FEBRUARY 1987 WORK LOAD INDICATOR for Irene Allen (OAI) Finance - Bancroft Accounts total hours 10:50 Billing Employees for Long Distant Calls total hours 20.00 Checks Crunched, put into Envelopes & Distributed total hours 5.50 total items 441 Cleared Checks total hours 1.5 Deposit - Change in process, takes less time to do deposit total hours 20.50 total items 4,242 5-Year Projected Budget Plan total hours 6.00 Finance total hours 64.00 Personnel - Board & Committee Map total hours 5.50 General Office Duties total hours 30.50 Meetings total hours 2.50 OSHA Report total hours 7.50 Performance Review total hours 2.50 Purchase Orders total hours 11.50 total items 68 .turn around time 7.5 hrs. (turn around time is - time I receive P.O. to be typed till it is ready to be mailed) Recruitment total hours 13.50 Volunteer Report total hours 3.00 Work Load Indicator total hours 2.00 Personndl total hours 78.50 03/03/87 CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 10/01/84 Mary Strickland Alleges age discrimination open 08/21/84 George Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car closed (Officers Johnson, Ober, & Newman) 02/04/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 01/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending (Office Merrill) 07/20/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened 03/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending 12/15/85 Ron & Peggy Cole Loss of jewelry — stolen closed without payment after insured had possession 04/05/86 John Hutchinson Trees cut on private closed — paid $3000 property for damage 07/25/86 R.A. Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path Pending �^ 31/31/86 David Fair Police negligence Open 04/06/86 Scott Fairbanks Code Enforcement negligence Open a 09/19/86 Renata Collins Water damage—drain overflow Open problem 07/10/86 Thomas Arnholtz Hit manhole cover open 08/22/86 Jerri Widner Alleges grievance re O.T.hrs. open 10/01/86 Hue Thi Phan Intersection accident reopened $1404.88 pd. Police vehicle & claimants other claims pending vehicle — personal injuries 11/24/86 Michael Ryan) Damage to homes & contents open Ransom Boyce) due to flooding 01/07/87 Shirene Mills Intersection accident open Collision — Police motorcycle & claimant's vehicle 12/14/86) Jay Aughenbaugh Sewer backup — damage open 02/04/87) home and yard \ 02/01/87 Family Medical Ctr. Sewer backup — damage to open offices a (0886F/0019F) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 12, 1987 FROM: Donna Corbet, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: Non—Staff Resources/Volunteer Report YTD EST. Category 1984-85 1985-86 Feb. '87 1986-87 1986-87 96 Change Boards & Committees 2552.75 3108.75 188.50 1680.00 2520. —18% Volunteer 591.50 4869.50 7304. +41 Staffing 4173.75 5171 .25 96 Federal Assistance 2660 1614.50 —0— 163 244.5 —8496 Community Service 1676 562 32 694.50 1041.50 +8596 Other 1300 283 —O— —0— —0— Total: 12,362.50 10,739.50 812. 7407. 11,110 +3% C 0947W MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley March 10, 1987 FROM: Wayne Lowry SUBJECT: February Status Report for Finance Division FINANCE: Foreclosures: I met with Ken Fox of the Attorney's office and we discussed foreclosure procedures for delinquent LID installment accounts. It is now up to us to start the procedure for foreclosure. I expect to get the process started again in early April. LID's: I had several meetings during the month related to Dartmouth, Hall/Burnham, and 135th LID's. We sent notices to the property owners of Hall/Burnham for final assessments and applications to Bancroft. Refinancing Bonds: I attended the bond sale closing on 2/24/87. All the appropriate documents were signed and the transaction was closed. The City will save $247,000 over the life of the bonds. ` Training: I attended a Dept. of Revenue seminar on spending and tax limitation rules. It was very pertinent to my job and I learned things I didn't know before. ACCOUNTING SECTION: Payroll: Linda continues to work the kinks out of the payroll system. It seems to be going very well. We have received very few complaints or questions from employees. I made contact with a direct deposit representative from U.S. Bank. She sent us some literature on direct deposit. IPM's direct deposit system allows deposit to only one account whereas the bank uses a system called "sure pay." It appears that implementing the "sure pay" system used by the bank may cost us some programming time. As we find out more, I will report to you. A/P: Linn continues to do a good job with A/P. We have been going out of our way to pay on items that departments submit late but have a real need to pay. Utility: Progress on the new system for utilities is slow ( mainly due to Melinda's irregular attendance. I feel that Melinda is slowly coming out of it and will be more dependable very soon. WL:cn/0912W a l { ACCOUNTING WORK MEASUREMENTS FOR THE MONTH OF February 1987 C^ Sewer/Storm Drain A/P 1986 1987 1986 1987 1723 5474 Bills Sent Out 256 334 A/P Checks 1426 3860 Sewer Payments Entered 852 614 Vendors - Sewer Cash Receipts Written Open Purchase Orders qgq Invoices Recd & Processed 150 257 Phone Calls Taken 112.69 Amt. Discounts Taken q Rebills Prepared 1 Void Checks 150 348 Name & Address Changes 1 Vendors Paid in Error New Customers Added to System Other Adjustments 320 Check Requests Delinquent Accounts Refunds P/R ( 256 Regular Paychecks 60 Tigard Pharmacy Collections 257 159 King City U.S. Bank Collect. O.T. Paychecks 30 34 Benefit Reports/Comp. 73 Payroll Changes A/R 679 Cash Receipts Entered 744 G/L Journal Entries Automatic & Manual Misc/Special Projects Standard Journal Entries Petty Cash Transactions Correcting Journal Entries Financial Reports Fanno Creek CDBG NSF Checks Returned NSF Checks Repaid i (WL:cn/1417F) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON March 10, 1987 T0: Jill Monleyn� FROM: Doreen Wilson' � SUBJECT: February Monthly Report for City Recorder/Office Services/Municipal Court-Records Sections Attached you will find the February monthly reports for the Municipal Court and Office Services Sections. City Recorder's Office o ' City Recorder participated in process for hiring Court/Records Manager which included an all-day assessment center. Nadine Robinson was the successful candidate and began employment with the City on February 9, 1987. o City Recorder spent considerable time during February on the South Metzger Annexation process. o t Recorder and DeputyRecorhas been spent der workloads positiongnd redefining roles for the City o Division Manager meetings have been implemented on a regular, weekly basis. cw/4568A --tee MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder March 9, 1987 FROM: Sherrie Burbank Office Services Manager SUBJECT: Monthly Report for February, 1987 Office Services had a very busy month during February. South Metzger kept all of us busy in one way or another. Following are some of the highlights for the month: Switchboard: There was a slight increase in the number of incoming telephone calls during February. Near the end of the month, I asked Pat to record the number of messages she was taking. She •took approximately 133 messages over a six . day period of time. This was primarily when Debbie was unavailable (lunch, breaks, already on the phone, etc.) We have since trained all three Office Aides to provide back up at the Message Center when Debbie is absent. Message Center: The Message Center has now completed its first full month of operation. Overall, we have noticed more efficient use of the telephones by staff. Pat and Debbie are combining their efforts to enhance the switchboard operation by forwarding various calls to the Message Center (i.e. , directions to City Hall, recruitment/general information, and messages). During the month, 399 messages were recorded through the Message Center. Debbie indicated the busiest days appear to be Mondays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. The heaviest hours were 9-10, 11:30-12:30, and 10-11:30, respectively. In addition to the calls received during business hours, the Message Center is responsible for answering the "night bell" which totaled approximately 74 calls during the month. I would like to add that with further staff training I think we will see additional usage of the Center beginning within the several months — especially as we approach budget preparation. Word Processing/Office Aides: We had an increase of 48 work orders this month which accounted for an additional 2,239 pages processed. Rushes and Special Projects remained very close to the same amount as during January. During February, the Building Division requested an Office Aide to assist in document filing and retrieving messages from the answering machine on a daily basis. In addition, I spent approximately 7 hours preparing a draft of the citywide budget for distribution to managers. Also, approximately 4 hours was devoted to training Bev to update and create basic glossaries. She is grasping these concepts and will now begin training in the development of more complexed glossaries. sb/0032W/0002W C GRAND TOTALS Number of Work Orders 522 Number of Pages 19,604 Total Turn—Around Time 2,871.4 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 179 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 85.5 hrs. Number of Special Projects 73 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 55.0 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 5.5 hrs. All figures are rounded to the nearest tenth. 0032W/0002W ti s MEMORANDUM City of Tigard, OR To: Loreen Wilson March 9, 1987 From: Nadine Robinson Subject: February Monthly Report for Municipal Court The number of cases filed in Municipal Court were up slightly over January. There were 308 traffic offenses filed and 10 misdemeanor cases filed. 290 cases were terminated, 176 by the Court and 114 through bail forfeitures, bail refunds and suspensions. There were 1908 cases pending at the end of February. This includes cases waiting for arraignment, set for trial, and cases with payments pending. Collection efforts are showing some progress, the overall fine amount owing is down by $699. The "fines amount" figures on the Citations Processed Through Municipal Court will be available from Accounting by February 16. i /\r i Ct LA-!ate M I.A,y 1 G r PA 1 fG a A- /4 SSI I I Imunk%pal C~0 0WOAth be Which 60M0CCwJ (Yarq AA-7T+FnwJy P,L—A q (Presiding Municipal Judge) MUNICIPAL COURT STATISTICAL REPORTING SYSTEM Monthly Reporting Form FIELD TRANSACTION . j 1 Cases Pending First Day 1. . 1.1 Major Traffic Offenses 1.1 1.2 Minor Traffic Offenses 1.2 �,p 1.3 Other Cases 4 1.3 .1:1 2 Cases Filed 2. 2.1 Major Traffic Offenses 2.1 2.2 Minor Traffic Offenses 2.2 &09 2.3 Other Cases 23 J0 3 Cases Terminated 3. � 3.1 Cues Tried 3.1 1 -7& 3.1.1 Major Traffic Offenses 3.1.1 -4� 3.1.2 Minor Traffic Offenses 3.1.2 L�.L 3.13 Other Cases 3.1.3 ��- 3.2 Other Terminations 3.2 3.2.1• _ Major Traffic Offenses 3.2.1 3.2.2Minor Traffic Offenses 3.2.2 72 3.2.3 Other Cases 3.2.3 37 4 Cases Pending Last Day 4. Ll,Sl1, 4.1 Major Traffic Offenses 4.1 -- 4.2 Minor Traffic Offenses 4.2 4.3 Other Cases 4.3 67 14CS-2 i I G o �. r- 0 f Cl. L ,� ` 1 y '� • G Ln u H �. � l A ,V, w C f'G 0../ N v O �. u ,n 0. N ,4 00 ¢a C •,, c ¢ w .r, LN _O H L17 ¢ Sq or o w 00 , do \nom c,do Ct' a o V .-4 � � 1 O ca O Q 14 U4.14 0x 0 cc O= V 1R z O �► +j t7 p' d W I� 00 da_4 O Aj vv p 1 o w u iJ 8 w 0 kc)i N x O w 14 a � I a on N O Z t+. O• M V n 111 � L C ca U04 0 N Lj w C ro bo W L C u b N rn V N m G N u d W 7 U c % .+ H +J 00 O 914 C: w . ro to ,. cc ca W A w H r 'ro O 3 at V to l CJ N d G W O C N Gca O to W 00 V ,Lj., �Q PG O4 y, V 7 C V ►. cm 0 •d ro N V d/ L d _Q v V. O 0! C) t0 �� Iq N A Q u V V H yT' c! `�'� y Z �+ 'u c. ,Ci vt C V u v CC H H 6 U N u v) H d �+ ro W 61 X �• d +9 L u V 0. ,p m V A �n V to u ro b ►+ 7 I B �+ .� N ccw N fe w coro ..� ►+ •.c cc o •.+ 7 7 . MEMORANDUM �- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 12, 1987 FROM: Jill Monley, Community Services DirectorJ., SUBJECT: January, 1987 Monthly Report January was a month of orientation. myself to the department's staff and functions and certainly of all staff to me. We began producing payroll on our new computer system. A few bugs still need to be worked out however, in view of the complexity and sensitivity of this issue it went well. South Metzger research and data gathering required extra effort throughout the department. The total Boundary Commission report was assembled and filed within the required deadlines. dc:1328p F �i y MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley February 9, 1987 FROM: Doris Hartig SUBJECT: Monthly Report Recruitment activity remained high, with many requests for information regarding positions, status of recruitment process, new employee orientation and the development of material for assessment centers. Staff experienced some difficulty in coordinating activities with departments. At the Safety Committee meeting fire drills, posting of building exit routes and location and type of fire extinguishers was discussed. Monthly brown bag lunch lecture was on cancer. Five employees attended. TPOA contract negotiations, OPEU contract review, E.A.P. fact gathering and dealing with the sensitive issues of SAIF claims also took considerable time. A review of purchasing rules was held with various units and divisions, the exception being the Police Department. I will schedule that as time permits. Problems still exist as employees are either careless or try to circumvent the system. It is a continuing problem of education and retrieving improper paperwork. DH:cn/0621W C : WORK LOAD INDICATORS Jan. 86 Jan. 87 Expenditure Reimbursement Requests Processed SHE 90 Purchase Orders Processed 93 107 Recruitments 2 5 Hires 0 3 Terminations 1 2 Unemployment Claims 1 0 Claims Filed: Workers Compensation 1 2 Liability (see attached report) Checks Written: Accounts Payable 202 369 Payroll 275 367 Sewer Payment Received 1,488 6,682 Sewer Bills Sent 1,466 5,371 Name, Address, Changes 235 733 Cash Receipts 654 684 Word Processing Work Orders Received 165 454 Emergency Requests 36 215 Pages Processed 9,042 20,665 Average Turn Around 6.0 3.5 Telephone Calls 7,175 10, 116 Walk—Ins 2,200 N/A Volunteer Hours 0 0 **Information not available C 0621W C 02/06/87 CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 10/01/84 Mary Strickland Alleges age discrimination open 08/21/84 George Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car closed (Officers Johnson, Ober, & Newman) 02/04/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 01/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending (Office Merrill) 07/20/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened 03/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending 12/15/85 Ron & Peggy Cole Loss of jewelry - stolen Reopened after insured had possession 04/05/86 John Hutchinson Trees cut on private Pending property 07/25/86 R.A. Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path Pending 01/31/06 David Fair Police negligence Open 04/06/86 Scott Fairbanks Code Enforcement negligence Open 09/19/86 Renata Collins Water damage-drain overflow Open problem 07/10/86 Thomas Arnholtz Hit manhole cover open 08/22/86 Jerri Widner Alleges grievance re O.T.hrs. open 11/24/86 Michael Ryan) Damage to homes & contents open Ransom Boyce) due to flooding 01/07/87 Shirene Mills Intersection accident open Collision - Police motorcycle & claimant's vehicle (0886F/O019F) t i f MEMORANDUM CITY OF T:IGARD, OREGON c TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council February 13, 1987 FROM: Donna Corbet, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: Non-Staff- Resources/Volunteer Report YTD EST. Category 1984-85 1985-86 Jan. 87 1986-87 1986-87 X Change Boards & Committees: 2552.75 3108.75 251 .25 1491 .5 2556.75 -17% Volunteer Staffing 4173.75 5171.25 580.5 4278 7333 .75 +41% Federal Assistance 2660 1614.5 -0- 163 279.25 -82% Community C_ Service 1676 562 49 662.5 1135.75 +102X Other 1300 283 -0- -0- -0- -0- TOTAL 12,362.5 10,739.5 880.75 6595 11305.5 +5X 1289p t MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley, Community Services Director March 12, 1987 FROM: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR JANUARY, 1987 The month of January was a very busy one for the whole division. Linda Parr has spent the majority of her time with IPM Programmers working out the details in the new payroll system. We ran live payroll on the new system for the January 20th paydate. Several errors in programming became evident. The programmers used Oregon State tax tables for monthly payroll rather than bi—monthly, therefore, underwithholding state income tax. We also found that the ICMA deferred comp. deductions were being deducted after tax rather than before. Both of these problems will be rectified by the 2/5/87 payroll. Programmers have been working on the utility management system and we expect to begin extensive work on utilities in late February. I spent many hours in January working the Bob and Jill on the City's 5 Year Financial Plan. I also was involved in the Budget Committee training session on January 20th and the meeting of the 27th. The advance Refunding Bond Bid opening was on January 27, 1987. I attended the meeting and presented the results of the bid opening later that day to the Council at a special meeting. WL:bs0912W 1 F I ACCOUNTING WORK MEASUREMENTS C FOR THE MONTH OF Januar87 i 4 Sewer/Storm Drain A/P 1986 1987 1986 1987 346 394 A/P Checks 1738 5417 Bills Sent Out 588 Vendci,s 1822 5128 Sewer Payments Entered Open Purchase Orders 21 Sewer Cash Receipts Written 569 Invoices Recd & Processed 429 Phone Calls Taken 35.54 Amt. Discounts Taken 34 Rebills Prepared Void Checks 325 Name & Address Changes 1 0 Vendors Paid in Error 55 New Customers Added to System t 0 Late Payments _.._? Other Adjustments 277 Requests Delinquent Accounts Refunds P/R f 255 242 Regular Paychecks 101 Tigard Pharmacy Collections 60 O.T. Paychecks 315 King City U.S. Bank Collect. 30 29 Benefit Reports/Comp. 50 Payroll Changes A/R 744 696 Cash Receipts Entered G/L Journal Entries Automatic & Manual Standard Journal Entries Misc/Special Projects Correcting Journal Entries Petty Cash Transactions Financial Reports Fanno Creek CDBG 5 NSF Checks Returned —— 4 NSF Checks Repaid C (WL:cn/1417F) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley, Community Services Director March 12, 1987 FROM: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder SUBJECT: Monthly Report — January 1987 Over 130 hours were spent by City Recorder alone on South Metzger annexation. This doesn't count hours of Word Processing, Deputy Recorder, or Records Clerk. Hired Brian Hartung to assist with annexation efforts. Spent approximately 30 hours hiring process for Court/Records Manager. LW:bs09l2W y + ;1 vt",h i OFFICE SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT January, 1987 ADMINISTRATION Number of Work Orders 19 Number of Pages 367 Total Turn—Around Time 65.1 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 16 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 11.4 hrs. Number of Special Projects 4 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 3.3 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 3.4 hrs. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Number of Work Orders 218 e Number of Pages 2,450 4k Total Turn—Around Time 1,430.0 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 65 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 18.1 hrs. Number of Special Projects 15 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 13.1 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 6.5 hrs. FINANCE Number of Work Orders 47 Number of Pages 2,135 Total Turn—Around Time 226.1 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 26 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 10.9 hrs. Number of Special Projects 11 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 6.7 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 4.8 hrs. Note: The statistics for Finance do not include delivery of the daily bank deposits. LIBRARY Number of Work Orders 10 Number of Pages 28 Total Turn—Around Time 76.2 hrs. Number of Rush Requests N/A Total Time Spent on Rush Requests N/A Number of Special Projects 1 Total Time Spent on Special Projects .3 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 7.6 hrs. r Ii_ 1 I PERSONNEL/CSD f i Number of Work Orders 74 Number of Pages 3,773 Total Turn—Around Time 281.7 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 23 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 6.1 hrs. Number of Special Projects 10 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 5.3 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 3.8 hrs. } POLICE { Number of Work Orders 24 Number of Pages 254 ! Total Turn—Around Time 85.6 hrs. i Number of Rush Requests 17 t Total Time Spent on Rush Requests .75 hrs. f Number of Special Projects 4 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 3.8 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 3.7 hrs. SUPPORT SERVICES/COUNCIL Number of Work Orders 82 Number of Pages 8,358 Total Turn—Around Time 247.1 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 41 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 45.5 hrs. i Number of Special Projects 26 4 } Total Time Spent on Special Projects 15.8 hrs. 1 Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 3.0 hrs. i Note: The statistics for Support Services do not include Office Aide time which was spent assisting Court. E GRAND TOTALS Number of Work Orders 474 Number of Pages 17,365 Total Turn—Around Time 2,411.8 hrs. Number of Rush Requests 188 Total Time Spent on Rush Requests 92.8 hrs. Number of Special Projects 71 Total Time Spent on Special Projects 47.8 hrs. Average Turn—Around Time per Work Order 5.0 hrs. All figures are rounded to the nearest tenth. f 0032W/0002W C. 4 i l RECEPTION INFORMATION SPECIALIST i Report for January 1987 January 1 through January 31, 1987 Total phone calls - 8,370 Average 441 calls per day for 19 days OPENING MAB,, Sorting and prepare sewer bills for deposit: 24 hours in 19 day period = Average 1.5 hours oer day ( two people now sorting, opening, etc.) BACK UP FOR: Accounting - 6 hours Personnel - 3 hours Receipts for January - 66 = 1.5 hours total Prepare mail at the end of day - 10 hours Money spent for postage = $1168.06 SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION CRECORDS SECTION MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 1987 JANUARY 1 — JANUARY 31, 1987 (20 Working Days) The Records Section employed 1 full—time records clerk. He worked a total of 132.5 hours during the month. Bill Quillard averaged 7.8 hours/day for 17 days (he missed three days due to illness). The majority of his time was consumed with daily filing/retrieving of records and converting/reorganizing files. The following is a breakdown of his time within the various project headings. LAST MONTH PERCENT CHANGE RECORDS REQUESTS (Used To Obtain Records From the Vault) Total Requests Processed: 59 47 + 20% In—House: 57 Citizen: 2 Total Files Removed: 140 81 + 42% Total Boxes Removed: 21 60 — 65% Total Copies Made: 232 228 + 2% Total Time Spent: 11 hrs, 13 mins 8 hrs, 38 mins + 23% Research Time Spent: 5 hrs, 25 mins 1 hr, 47 mins + 67% Avg. Time/Request: 11.40 minutes 11.23 mins +1.5% C Avg. Requests/Day: 3.47 2.24 + 35% Avg. Time/Day: 39.59 minutes 25.14 mins + 36% OTHER DAILY FILING/RETRIEVING Total Time Spent: 34 hrs, 47 mins 34 hrs, 22 mins + 1% CONVERT/REORGANIZE FILES Total Time Spent: 30 hours 43 hours — 30% Avg. Hours/Day: 1.76 hours 2.04 hours — 14% RECORDS INVENTORY Total Time Spent: 2 hours 1.5 hours + 25% Avg. Hours/Day: .12 hours .07 hours + 42% TEAM MEETINGS/TRAIN PERSONNEL Total Time Spent: 5.5 hours in 4 days 8.5 hrs in 6 days — 35% (Records Committee-1.5 hours) COURT BAILIFF DUTIES Total Time Spent: 7.5 hrs in 4 days 7 hrs in 5 days + 7% COUNCIL/COURT SET—UP 6 TAKE/DOWN Total Time Spent: 8.5 hours in 10 days 8.5 hrs in 9 days — C4360A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23 1987 DATE z unp IT I ED ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Transportation theVCommittee N. Council workshowith p _ Advisory Committee Restructuring PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Restructuring of the Transportation Advisory Committee. _ INFORMATION SUMMARY cil and members At the workshop emeComm�ittee Januaryon 26th 2concentrate units efforts lone citywide agreed that roved a transportation planning. At its February meeting, h and Committee P of the draft resolution which would redefine the purpose Committee as discussed at the workshop. A copy of the proposed resolution is attached. Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 84-62 which originally formed the Committee. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the resolution as presented. 2. Amend the resolution. 3. Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT None. SUGGESTED ACTION The Committee recommends adoption of the attached resolution. RRW:cn/817W E 3 3 :9 Y 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 84- r, - A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD RSITCITY COUNCIL OWERS AND CREATING DUTIA TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE, DEFINING ystem in WHEREAS, d ardt is of maintenance importance effective tothe livability iands economic the City off TigTig Well-being of Tigard residents and businesses; and, WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council at its goals workshop in July, 1984, identified Transportation and Capital Improvement Program issues as high priorities; and, WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council discussed a possible citizen advisory committee and the need for expanded public input to the Public Facilities planning process; and, ommerce has recommended the formation of WHEREAS, the Tigard Area Chamber of C Advisory Committee and indicated its willingness to an official Transportation assist in such an advisory committee; and, WHEREAS, staff recognizes the need to coordinate Transportation plans with related Wastewater plans and Public Works maintenance programs; and, issio lWHEREAS, Oregon law requires Litie plans based on the Development Comprehensiv�e Plan;n to ' review and approve Public Facil NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The Tigard City Council ordains and establishes a Transportation Advisory Committee. Section 2: The purpose of the Transportation Advisory Committee shall be to develop, maintain and advise as to the implementation of a Transportation Public Facilities and coordinated with related Wastewater rPlan affecting plans.Transportation Section 3: The Committee will consist of nine members, no more than by o the whom Of may be non-residents of the City of Tigard, to be app ointedfour members will be appointed for two year terms and Council. Initially, remaining position, .that of the Mayor or Mayor's four for one year terms. The with the term of office. Subsequent designee, will rL^ continuous appointments, except that of the Mayor or the yor's completing the will be ofor two year terms except where an app ointee previous committee member. Committee members shall receive no compensation. The Committee shall be composed of the following nine members: a. The Mayor of Tigard or the Mayor's designee from the City Council. b. A representative of the Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce. C. One resident of Tigard living north and vest of S.W. Pacific Highway. : RESOLUTION NO. 84-,_ One resident of Tigard living south and east of S.W. Pacific Highway- d. Commission or designee. \ e. A representative of the Tigard Planning f. An at-large member. g. An at-large member. h. An at-large member. i. An at-large member. In choosing at large members, the City Council shall give consideration to ersons representatives frointerested in or m the bicycling ionall un commuters, engineers or other dependent upon mass transit, g h school student, preferably a Junior transportation specialists and one hig each year. { with an annual term expiring June 1, of i Works will serve as an ex-officio member. The Director of Public ittees and enlist the aid The Committee is authorized iectal special of concern 1 of private citizens to study special i i s: The Committee shall be advisory only to the Sect= 4 - Powers and Dutie i City Council. The Committee shall meet periodically, at least 9 times per year. The Committee shall review regional and local transportation plans. The Committee shall develop a Transportation Previe Facilities date ache trelated 1 assistance. The Committee shall annuaallythr Public Facilities Plan. 'fie Capital Improvements Plan priorities p standards and Committee shall review and recommend as to related engineeringbikeways and mass Plan policies. Transportation shall include streets, Y transit systems. The Committee scall review and recommend a balance of budget resources between operations t. PASSED: This day of !j <, u ' Z 1984. Mayor City of Tigard i i ATTEST: h lDeputy��City sLLc c'Recorder City of Tigard C C I � RESOLUTION NO. 84- 6.,,? i i PAGE No. 2 j (dc:0558p) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: M�rr1i iF,, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ��a- with— PREVIOUS ACTION: Denim of ap ,al Program (M= f36) - by C PREPARED BY: Keith_T•':?on_ DEPT HEAD OK! GITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 9, 1987, the City Council upheld the Director's interpretation related to the Janis Youth shelter. The staff has prepared a resolution in accordance with the Council decision. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the resolution as prepared by staff. 2. Approve an amended resolution. FISCAL IMPACT r SUGGESTED ACTION t . Approve resolution as submitted. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87— a A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF AN INTERPRETATION OF DIRECTOR'S DENYING THEREQUEST DECISION SENTER NG INDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. PROGRAMS, INC. (M 16-86) CONCLUSIONS. WHEREAS, the applicant requested a review of a Director's interpretation of Section 18.42.020 (a) and Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above request at its regular meeting of February 9, 1987, and March 9, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The City Council upholds the Planning Director's interpretation of the Community Development Code which classifies the youth shelter facility as a "Group Care Residential" a use that requires a Site Development Review approval in accordance with Code standards. Section 2: The Council, therefore, ORDERS, that the above referenced request be, and the same hereby is DENIED. The Council FURTHER ORDERS that the Planning Director and the City Recorder send a copy of the Final Order as a Notice of Final Decision to the parties in this case. PASSED: This day of 1987• Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard 3058P/dmj RESOLUTION NO. 87- 4 Page i i e lD. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 23, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: Board and Committee Appointments PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Mayor's Appointments Com. POLICY ISSUE Board and Committee Appointments to fill vacancies. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee has met several times over the past month to interview applicants for the various boards and committee vacancies. Attached are resolutions recommending appointments to the City Center Plan Task Force, Economic Development Committee, Library Board, Parks Board, Transportation Advisory Committee, and the Utilities and Franchises Committee. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Council Motion to approve recommended appointments. \/ dc:1347p MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 16, 1987 FROM: Catherine Wheatley, Deputy Recorder OA SUBJECT: Board and Committee Appointments At this time, final appointment recommendations for the Board and Committee appointments on the March 23, 1987 agenda have not been determined. These recommendations will be hand carried. cw C.C. .. C.TYOF TIGAW CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: hI�'�h DATE: (RES.): ADDRESS /j�,/CnC �A� J�'�i'/r''l' ! + /G/1 97Z RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): ?('nnl S(,t) Mor fj�( 'r BUS. PHONE: ���//-�/J` X /0/,3 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD• 2 '/2 r SUGGESTED BY: �)P,(t�5 I P I 1 e,(— WHERE WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? V � r EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Ao ines5 OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: TPr'{1/)rr �� iter! �e�r- 40r HON LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: rhyrch r 1a4e ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: L' OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): S 17 OtiF 5`7 SJrCX'Q 1/)� C 4 1►' �ne�l r;,-�I� tem �,►d err -rv��� o- �)A- 3 BC AS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: PAi'kS'8 ��L'. Ci k rce. 'CI: CLS ------------------------------------------------- __ _ ------------------- Date Received at City Hall _ Date lntervicvcd 3�/p (0,00 Date Appointed Board, Committee. tit NPO inside City Outside City (03461)) C.TYOFTIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: Start K Cohen DATE: January 29, 1987 ADDRESS (RES.): 14275 S W 125th Ave. , Tiaard,OR 97224 RES. PHONE: 639-4795 ADDRESS (BUS.): 1105 Standard Plaza, 1100 SW 6th BUS. PHONE: 222-5510 Portland, OR 97204 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: approx 2 yrs SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Lake Oswego, Oregon EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Whitman College, Walla Walla (B.A. Econordi•cs)'; -Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College (JD w/ honors) OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Associate attorney w/ Bernard, Kneeland, Crawford & 3rophy; duties include assistance on land use cases involving a major amendment to the Portland UGB, as well as genefa�, iggtion & real estate matters. As a law :lerk with Hermann & Associates,v I worked on other land use matters. HON LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 18 months rHIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY• I am a current member of the Portland Rotoract, a communit'_ ervice organization whiSse purpose is to assist other c ari a e organizations chieve their goals. ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Past treasurer of Portland Rotoract for 1986; currently being considered for position of vice president. OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): I have a keen interest in helping to reviti lize the Downtown Tigard Area I am proud of our city and hope the area can attract new and diversified retailers to the downtown area. I was pleased to learn of :Kauffman Stream Born Fly's decision to move downtown, as well as Dicks Color Center. These are steps in the right direction, but additional planning is clearl. needed to achieve a stable economic base in downtown Tigard. 11C.tOS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: City Center Plan TASK FORCE or Economic Development Board or committee. ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------- --- --------------Date lncerviewed Date Received a[ City Hall 3 9 Oace Appointed Board. Committee, .it NPU ".inside CiCy Outside City TY OF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: lR1S �1�� DATE: L �gO�`, ADDRESS (RES.): I (� �� �.+�r v �- 7 72-23 RES. PHONE: Cp0 -j 7!j�S ADDRESS (BUS.): 101 �`��y�1� �D�"f1. N►'� BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: ,41A � SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ea$w"I i OPEO'• EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: '$ un 1�I�I5 OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: LT � HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? �1 ?'� 6 CHIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: 1---i I'-( Of ocmpt� Ti ;0 . I nr-%o "LAO GLTIS'o �S_YN1��� coram ►-r-�1. ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: � �STI �3L�St ISSi�%wivS - � �J?iTtO corn m u W i ,amu - i d 40c cc c-:11 i yLG LJiCi C`'�L �- D I N: rIT f[#rJ'[ir�R�l L dl.�.. �C�t�l N 1 NG_CdIr1M., ------ nate ----nate Interviewed 3/io a0 Ptil ..... ..�.�.wau�eu Board. Comntttee. m NPO N46p) ide City Outside City -- .......... . . . �r::v:�i•J:a1 CITYOF TIGARn CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION �1 GATE: / _ f&/, 47 c; NAME: �/y� �J l/��'L � - / c� ADDRESS (RES-): ?S , O �w ', �n �z4w/ y7lZlfES. PHONE: �/ ;y G ADDRESS (BUS.): Z L — / �G Ar v BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? %✓/� n y� EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: 1,40 140 �17 S'c�hvd L" OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: A by C/�✓tet /)�' ��i�c� Ll �v l..'c'/Jt �i�� -r i�/o - CJ��-��v � �S' ✓ e �✓a rye • // /OJJ �j�,C /'L('J t, ,N LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? CA'Y IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR � NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS 'i�1.Y)? / � PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: /G�� /1 `/'/'��Cr /J000'/ ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): //'ice/ -�/7^/��'�'y '� 1,4,-r a o,/ ✓L Ili e he/y �i �� 7'1 �`,�- 7 G' �� ✓ J�;-o; e-. C. BOARDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: _ ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ------ Date Received at City Hall Uate interviewed 3l/D Uate Appointed Boacd. comunictec. of •d ••c Outside Cit (� L.TY OF TI17A RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: R. Michael Marr t� DATE: Dec 4, 1986 ADDRESS (RES.): Ll SLI yl 5 S W 87th ('t 7�/ zz / RES. PHONE: 620-2372 ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 15 Years SUGGESTED BY: Valerie Johnson WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Salem Ore on EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Administration 3S Oregon State University Busines� • Post Baccalaureate Portland State University - At-(-ounting OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Self-Lmployed Accounting Consultant• Previously held positions as Comptroller, Assistant Controller, Freight Claims Manas*cr HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: Terrific N Qard Kiwanis, Founded TiTn - , (h•P^ni zed opposition to Plaid_Pantry Stores on Hal_1_ B�vd nea n •,i +3 � A :^1•�nnl rPas� Have tici ated in several political activities ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Terrific Tia-ard Kiwanis ( President, SLcretary, rr0-- s Chprs), Tigard Promotions, Inc. (President, Board Chprs), .Jest Portland United Methodist Church (Administrative Board Chprs, Board Mbr, Treasurer in coming year) OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): I have a strong belief in the future of Timard and wish to participate in the preparation There is a need for constructive creativity with ompassion for the positions of both residents and business. All endeavors of the city_ could reflect a 'return for the investment' that can be seen by those carrying the financial the projects should be feasible and the explanations to the exnensP �honld h� vPii t[ •ght out and understandable. u ..<DS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Downtown Design Committee beim or�anize� to xork with Portland State University planning group. ----------------------------------- -----------------------:--------------------- ,,o Ptit Date Received at City Hall Date (ntervicved !D Oate Appointed Board, Commtttee. of NPu Inside City Outside City ,- e (0346p) 6• S� 6 TIGM0 CITY OF T 11 ARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION p f--- DATE: NAME: G < ✓ ADDRESS (RES. /Z 170 �- �'y��� 3 RES. PHONE: 2 0-5 7 50 ): /J �� G /�� ADDRESS (BUS.): '('5�� Z 3 S/�Sf //85 � 'yh Q yaBUS. PHONE: 2 -` `f o LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: �b `-�a�� SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? /I�-R--� �T / f EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: /J 77'U"t N /GA- f t 'crN ec.✓ Q' ✓154'� . �G�t < COW LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: 11-04-1 ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: /o I� S OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): EES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Ql� r! 6V'✓ BOARDS. WMHLTT - ---------------------------------------------------------- Date Received at City Hall nate lnc¢rvicvcd Oats Appointed Board. couuaittee. CIO NIK1 arm Y INVEN'T'ORY OF CITIZENS Su�;�ested for Community Service DATE 3i�5/86 ARES. PHONE 639-2297 LAME Kate ?cart ` ��Gso swUS. PHONE 685-2036 ADDRESS 196&4 SW �aren,�0- Tc��� 4`7.22 23B LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD 1 year SUGGESTED BY WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Gar°�n Home area EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Presentlya senior, enrolled at PSU art-time; (also OSU & U df P) ; Graduated from Mar crest H.S. OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND Major Account S ecialist in Leasing Business at Tektronix; previously a Financial Assistant. Experience in managerial and administrative areas, also. PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY - Served as member of lay advisory board for CHarney County Family Planning Advisory Council ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES _ Working on a fund-raisin fI c Friends of Public Broadcasting _ OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) I have a great deal of interest in learning more about the City of Tigard, and in becoming involved in programs to expand the scope of the Parks and Recreation De artment. ig BOARDS OR COMMITTEES INTERESTED IN Parks and Recreation �e�rs, ,. a�in i - lute Interviewed Date Received at City Hall Date Appointed Board or Committee INSIDE CITY OUTSIDE CITY -- t •i�G CITYOF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: JOHN SAVORY DATE: 2/25/87 ADDRESS (RES.): IT�ttal �vt' C,,Tec/JtES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): [1��yS S t� Me,.j^ I 1 a e, 11- Bus. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? LL EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: fTTKruso e CQ.vl �C SN �tm'�� �o�`l� .-d n n ` c r rr J u �1/'Ccrw,�I t H •�-F i �... �!�U FJD� � �D✓f I c.kU OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: JIs ko I ey ` n - Ise- e2 y�(� - f�C F�✓Cs • S sW�c��t �. HQ' LONG HAVE YOU BEEN'EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? /iZ C- IS``THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? A IJ t Vc eOdS ►V ti u,(AL V0 PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: A 0Gcvy Goavlcj o 'f" 01t,cCom'o!s �1 ccyof (2, o".tbev ©p C0© vtAe,1ee-- ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: ( V•e as u•✓ey L2F c a Od CJA Qkyr -e ivw�G�t v ► �� Yi Da�tQ 17eve1o,0m--C fiA. t �a w K.�ocnJN- o rt.cA•c c, OTHER INFORMATION (GENEP.AL REMARKS): BOARDS, ()UHMLTTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: a C0§,0, ,C, Vef/ I N14PtiL ------------------------ _-___-___-_-_---_--___- Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Oate Appointed Board. Committee. tit NPO Inside City Outside City CiTYOF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: V(.j_SGC--.'L. -ZCJ C�tG-JL/L DATE: ^3 0 ADDRESS (RES.): /00loS5(.v / 1lP�00CL - 97ZZT RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.)• /OS�OO 1-'&o �c 5CcLcL2� 3 V 17-23 BUS. PHONE: &Z-0 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? /► ` 1'77& -'Fro) , EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: (0su) J7 r2eD`o 2 �en7'�L �o,� � �• �k-' -`�P OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: , HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? C PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): .SDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED LN: ------ ---------------------------------------------•----------------------------- Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, at NPO lnsidc .City Outside City _ (03461)) NOFTIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: C'./�D.d, .�.�iClot�l ///�/U�c.Ok 1 - DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): RES. PHONE: 70L ADDRESS (BUS. ): BUS. PHONE:' ,n LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: .3 i ( J SUGGESTED BY: z� �u�y WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? 1%2 A±=. L EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: os, L :Q" 1/g7G l R OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: 44S�x�o�- L 1193-rIS9� /d,u x�� C�-� l :�D�-•�� .��.-�.;E• HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? -3 THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: IJGGf/ ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: �(,- �Q ` r-�.�.-a/ LLrt�l� ✓-t-O Ci< OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): BC :DS, COMMIrrEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Date Received at City Hall Date Incerviewed Date Appointed Board, Committer. o! N110 Inside City _ Oulsidf- Ctl y - ---,~---_ _ (U34G10 C.TYOFTIGA- RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: F John Etzel DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): 14848 SW 109th, Tigard, OR 97224 RES. PHONE: 639-1678 ADDRESS (BUS.): PO Box 2946, Portland, OR 97208 BUS. PHONE: 294-7158 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 1 year SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? Corvallis, OR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Bachelors of Science in Civil Engineering at Oregon State University, .Corvallis, OR in December 1984. OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Work as a Civil Engineer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, Portland, OR. HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 1 year C THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: St. Boniface Parish Lector. ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Member of American Society of Civil-Engineers, currently hold a Fundamentals of Engineering Certificate. OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): I am very interested in getting involved in T{,gards' city Government I would appreciate your consideration for _a board or Tommi t ee Thanks R-LDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Received at City Hall Date lnterviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee. tit fillO -.Inside City Outside City _ •'_ '346p) CT:�^af:T11GARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: ;NCne` Ann Newr Drub DATE: S,.1TZ5. 11WO ADDRESS (RES-): j q 5--,C) SyU 92 l ioUrd OR RES. PHONE: 6�0 4 765 ADDRESS (BUS.): 24-4-<j Li berj.r Sf AIF_ scaIemr nP BUS. PHONE: 372-645 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: 60 rltc�4 SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIME PREVIOUSLY? 150-5 NE N01man Or+16LrAC1. 0� EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: A85 F_ P_dIr011' r 'i ' `T OCCUPATION/AL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: ltrr✓1*,4 %1 et 7r"' r� ')iG�nal TCc6' r,Ak1 Ire, nee 6r A/ Qregrm 5tafe- .44.1. IlIy151071 I Kl ,S `U_- vrodtichbr; SGS%VrJIIYlr,V1 1� ytl(JYI�(/Cfi✓i�"N redo- bi- do-vetoVIA�eyifiltv'.1iybled c.IGIulf-, h LJ111t�. 1. At o !�✓dVC /:l/C(clCi/17�G J���'� HOLT LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 7 nT)nf'►5 THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: r ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Z am -1L 7-affic, lona l S{w S key 4kih OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): fI5 a r1;I Achl tnlvrK irecf�� _— UJA ?ruf/c E�cinirrs L ,m I(S�iitr Hr G GY ikt l�P,�� 6f iY1fi rr+cfiGn On _1, / J J il"4 rC- C O)l bl /J{S Gu�SO /lWz&ad m /fiP feaiif rey;5lOj% o ft e- Sysf&)1 of SNr k ;11 -T;'70'-d.I l gGrd BCDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: 7►_QnsPattLbUn Cammi dL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Keceived at City Hall Date interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee. of NVO inside City Outside laity (0346p) .TYOF TIG- RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: 'T/N Ale,C ILI DATE: - > ADDRESS (RES.): RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): YG��5- S �. (�D�•e - ci(/rC 5����cLF BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: ("n tM 'C9 . SUGGESTED BY: fJ7iiL�Gf�2• WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: `J •� �QZ ,4,.,,� �Tf►Tf Oar/✓mai✓ ���h' �y� s�u���s OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: (J� F,�,-,�L /�/.t.a��E.e �Q c '"'S <ff5 /�v4C op V A — �`(t'�Ck n C K /<)c -r e- J Yds 6/�CG-f•2i.f NOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? l' i'!Q ? PRn Bi+Br-� j' THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NN AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? ��i• ` v PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: /C/�/l�- ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: ���/s�Tiyi✓fr'C ��C/��l/iC �l�lr£'i Y OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): �,•�• �A' t2 i o 42- -z- 7- 2- T' S� / �•s f 2,nr a c,v -,-,✓ /L!.¢/!_�=.P .��v�-'DE J �i1.�//�L''�iv�' �-•'�•<2 fG,, ,,� 1.. tDs. commirms OR NPO INTERESTED IN: S�o,cri9T,aN o ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Received at City Hall Date lntervie-ed Date Appointed Board, Committee. m NPO lnside City Outside City a (0346p) 4 f t RECEIVED k . •I�fi CITYOFTIGARDEB 0 21987, CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION ITY OF TIGARD NAME: 1 �� � r7.-{C/JC� OATS: ADDRESS (RES.): IAS-OS- S RES. PRUNE: ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: /h y Jw•+ i1�yYJT WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? �e r✓., l l(S j>R� l rc./Z 1 l`I EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: 3 S 6tne- ! Sa rnw� � � I Ing OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: c .1asA,%n HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? t II THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? I PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: �" Lta✓!. �JGP� 6i�-�7/L / -y4fy e' 3--7 LL! �. Ja�u.,'�c!/ a-� /Ia^tins �ia�Gl �^'/�S G�/llN� ��'i � svw-t c� (lLl✓n-fcC/ ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): M4 w.��— �ll�oar n'✓r'G�'�1G�~" �` � i�1 T fV /sl��/✓G< 7 // .qrF.- �10� ti�C� !aa k.,nC 77-*Vol 7� bGca�+i�S q.s /7✓O/✓G� /n 17V/• /7Cr11 Ca7Mn1JlIT7 1 G1/� W�/t�0. le BOARDS. — 1 i C - BOARDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: GC C &14" 74,j4- 7/+''-c c•- �3�fZ«'^'^"`/'<<✓c��•-►�+� f Date Received at City Hall Date lncerviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee. tit NPO _ .tilnside City Outside City _ 'V�4 6 p) RECEIVED 2-,t 1y�35 ;ITYOF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD �.--,�I a I , r d S DATE• NAME: RES. ADDRESS (RES.): — �' BUS. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: - +Y» S /SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: ST e-r SST ka OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: ! f HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? ?S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY). �— C PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: �4'1 ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: Me. t7 < RD k- OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL kEMARKS): 7ARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED iN: Rec ; a� C -------------------------- ----------------------------------- Date Received at City Hall Q�a?���s Date Interviewed 1"1--:101e5- 0 Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO L :ie VL Inside City Outside City (0346p) C1TYOFTIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: DATE: —IDS ADDRESS (RES.): 7-7yb.7 S, (,{� Q��11//¢�/ S�- q�� RES. PRUNE: ADDRESS (BUS.): NONE BUS. PHONE: Norsk LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: I MQ& SUGGESTED BY: hqAxalN�vs q WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? 50 S.GlJ ���ON.QC1'O S00-1��� EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: JG1Z00( �m6�N o 4VJ4;-&;A! v iv aJl ,C�6�,eA ME OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: W, HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? Il... iHIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: i1�dNE OTHER INFQRH TION (GENERAL REMARKS): Awe A ROS A Nd 0/V Add sv/1'JE W'Vcl dX,4/N BOARDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: f /1.- 11/ I�I/ //SSE [.01�1�7�'•`'� - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date Received at City Hall Date interviewed Date Appointed Hoard, Committee. 0I NPU Inside City Outside City 'i (03461) C'NOF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION 9AF j1 $6 NAME: fe6ecIKAH a1 'rr DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): $�Ttl zl-6 Tx�; no- 9zZ3 RES. PHONE: /do-Aar ADDRESS (BUS.): lee-,p ,1 �A rJA) 4yp dr,Ca0/— 9/7"6- BUS. PHONE: ldl/-37L1 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: /Xx SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? t .✓6raJ JyL.< 11&bo� t/ vGs A�lyzo.t+l EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Aq. .V� 6DUCA71-nJ r A -r7-oAJA .rY-A7X UAtffl, S 7Ri41&g A -4?A9 -A 4rzvom gmn5 [.c� ,a^ry .9Z OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: -TYew-._1eA W sr j -s- -c.cTr cntG_ 'rti+!r�a � Se4,t.3 w �-JAt¢ wi�I..W -fpgY-a)Adgf HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: , ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): Rq Eps -rttfE &A_sr Fi>uk c.IiE4RS s DIAL'= Oh'Keo 4-T AO WSTrt AcdA(AAMM44 I r 1Asz y c> err2 OPPJ2.t-rmiA BC as. COMMITmES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: Ba cGt�T'� /.S62AQt �i�.)oucsc, �6✓rct��.Jt' -------------------------------------------------------tt---------------------------------- Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Uate Appointed Board, Commtttec, tat NYU Inside City Outside City _ (0346p) • Co- 5-� TY OF TIGA- RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION NAME: --I 4L'*1 K� li/7 DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): / 0?0/ S S&" 119",-C,10 CJS Sf '1 y RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): W �q '��%� BUS. PHONE: a T�� e 1 J LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: �� Y-n C, SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? �( a I--i 0 0 k KD EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: �e.f�e �� O�v (A -1 c O �J ,per 5 { P_ N OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: S !� �nC, C,� � "t P ►�1. W j-,, L o s4-r(A c4 o r HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? -:--TilM*CONPA`NY-4,OCATRD+iW1,T1tIN.YOUR:NPO+AREA-(NPO•.APkLICANTS.QIALY,):Z,.�.�.•...... .:.,�,.;........ ::-,-,,. _•....:,.._.: PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: p K) Re's ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: �� OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMAkKS) : ^ S C' S ARDS, COMMITru.s OR NPO INTKRh.S•11.1) 1N: `----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date Received at City Hall Date !nr_erviewed Date Appointed Board, Commlttee, or NNO Inside City Outside City (031461)) � ----- -- — PAID 1986 INVENTORY OF CITIZ17NS OF suggested-for Communit Service DATE__ A4A-J L�•I 1��� �. PHONE NAME �l-(--Fil C� I BUS. PHONF. 6 ! o " l f L ADDRESS 14'� Lam" _ •t � . r SUGGESTED BY LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD / "T WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ---�— t 0 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND l�• A • 1 a OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND �' M er.-c 77— PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITYT��) a �- ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES d srB�A F[1 A S A �dn,liv �' T7��✓c ��''�` v Coy OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS) BOARDS OR COMMITTEES INTERESTED ----------------------------- �_._.._._._._. Date Received at City Hall Bate Interviewed Date Appointed Board or Committee INSIDE CITY OUTSIDE CITY _ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 16, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Solid Waste Rate PREVIOUS ACTION: None Increase — METRO Dumping Rate Increase PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan DEPT HEAD OK ZALITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Shall the solid waste franchise haulers be permitted to pass along to cosumers the recent METRO rate increase affecting dumping charges? INFORMATION SUMMARY METRO recently increased the disposal rates charged at the St. John's Landfill and Clackamas Transfer and Recycling Center. The increases will affect Tigard's three franchise haulers. The haulers have requested that the increases in charges at the disposal sites be passed on to the consumers. An increase of $.15 per can and $.23 per yard is proposed. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Accept the staff recommendation and allow the haulers to increase solid waste rates according to the schedule contained in the resolution to be hand delivered on March 23. 2. Deny the proposed increase. 3. Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION - The staff and Utility and Franchise Committee will provide a recommendation at the' March 23 meeting. /br3067P MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council March 16, 1987 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, A111- Community Development SUBJECT: Solid Waste Rate Increase - METRO Dumping Rate Increase Tom Miller of Miller Sanitary Service, Inc. , one of Tigard's three solid waste franchise haulers, called me on March 12 and asked that the Council consider a rate increase created by METRO's recent increase in disposal costs. The METRO rates, effective April 1, 1987, are outlined in the attached letter dated February 9, 1987. Copies of the letter were in a recent Council packet under "Council Mail". Mr. Miller has requested that the Council pass a resolution allowing the haulers to immediately increase rates to cover this increase. He cites Section 11.04.090(c) of the TMC which reads: "(c) Rates to be charged by the franchises under this chapter shall be set by the city council by resolution as deemed necessary by the council. Except, increases in charges to the franchises for solid waste disposal site fees imposed by a governmental agency may be included in the rates by council resolution, provided such increases are evenly distributed among the rates. The franchises shall provide sixty days written notice with accompanying justification for all other proposed rate changes. The council shall give due consideration to the purposes of this chapter and the Annual Report filed by franchises." $.15 per can, based upon an average can weighing 30 lbs. $.23 per yard of loose material based upon an average of 200 lbs. per loose yard. The haulers request that the rate increase go into effect immediately. They will then notify their customers of the impending increase. Mr. Miller informed me that Council action now would result in a possible May 1 implementation date. The advance notice to customers prompted the addition of this item to the March 23 agenda as the next meeting is not scheduled until April 13, 1987. A staff and Committee recommendation will be presented at the March 23 Council meeting following Committee consideration on March 18, 1987. A resolution will be hand delivered. C /br3067P NIE1 O 2000 S.W.First Avenue Portland,OR 97201-5398 5031221-1646 February 9, 1987 Mr. Robert Jean, City Administrator City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 972230 Dear Ur--ealit: MetroCouncil Richard Waker Pn�idin�Officer Over the past several months the Metropolitan Service Di,triL.t District (Metro) has been conducting its annual Solid Jim Gardner Waste Rate Study. The 1987 Rate Study of disposal fees Dr+uty Prr+uling c>If;<t•r has been completed. The Metro Council received public District testimony and input from its citizen Rate Review Committee o>trictI dale and has set rates to go into effect April 1, 1987. The SOkyKirkpatrick adopted rates are lower than the proposed rates of which D,".14 you were notified in early December. The rates charged at Tom Delardin ( .1istrict5 Metro sites and Metro fees charged at non-Metro sites are \,.IrgeVanBergen being implemented this spring to allow sufficient time for DI$MCI6 waste collectors and the regulating..jurisdictions to make Sharron Kelley District? adjustments in their operations, if needed (e.g . , commence Mike Bonner recycling programs or new fee structures) . Di.<Nic18 Tanya Collier DI,ki9 Disposal at the St. Johns Landfill will cost $16.70 per Larry cooper ton for commercial haulers and $3.50 per cubic yard for David K0I" public haulers. At the Clackamas Transfer & Recycling 11wr iii°WCenter, the fees will be $19.70 and $3.90, respectively. c-r� Metro encourages, however, the use of alternative v2rriri facilities, wherever possible. The Metro User Fee or the Re�tCi ma Regional Transfer Charge will be imposed according to the enclosed table. The increase to commercial haulers at the St. Johns Landfill and CTRC is $2.32 per ton. The change translates to about 20¢ per month extra for one-can-per-week collection service to residences, $2.75 per month for two-cubic-yard-per-week service to businesses, and $6.00 per 20-yard drop box. The rates are higher due to waste reduction and diversion measures designed to increase the life of the St. Johns Landfill. Disposal is one cost incurred by haulers. Insurance, fuel, labor and other costs should also be considered in evaluating collectors' costs. You will need to examine the increase or decrease of each factor on the collection rates in your individual community. February 9, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call Steve Rapp or Rich McConaghy at 221-1646. If you would like to discuss the impacts of this disposal rate increase on collection fees which you regulate, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and the hauler (s) in your area. Sincerely, Tor Lyshaug t Acting Director of Solid Waste gl 6977C/D2 Enclosure x N: . 4 SUMMARY OF METRO DISPOSAL RATES Effective April 1, 1987 i 3 ST. JOHNS LANDFILL Commercial Public Rates Rate $/2.5 cyd Vexxtdra $/ton trip Base Rate $9.25 $5.43 $2.11 User Fee $3.20 $1.00 $0.40 Regional Transfer Charge $2.75 $1.88 $0.75 Rehabilitation/Enhancement Fee $0.50 $0.15 $0.06 State Landfill Siting Fee $1.00 $0.30 $0.12 ------------------------ TOTAL RATE $15.70 $8.75 $3.50 Special Waste Fees at St. Johns:$25 Special Waste Permit Application Fee $4.00/ton Special Waste Surcharge, plus the $16.70/ton regular commercial rate $50 per trip minimum charge M Uncontaminated yard debris rates of $9.25/ton (comm7<rcial) or $2/cyd (public) are offered at St. Johns CTRC Commercial Public Rates Rate $/2.5 cyd $/extra Won trip cyd -------------------------------------------- Base Rate $9.25 $5.43 $2.17 User Fee $3.20 $1.00 $0.40 Regional Transfer Charge $2.75 $1.88 $0.75 Rehabilitation/Enhancement Fee $0.50 $0.15 $0.06 State Landfill Siting Fee $1.00 $0.30 $0.12 Convenience Charge $3.00 $100 --------;0.40 ------------------ - TOTAL RATE $19.70 $9.75 $3.90 Additional fees stray apply for disposal of tires, excess weight at St. Johns, uncovered loads, one ton cocmercial minimum, possible special waste lab fees if costs are incurred by Metro. The public minimum rate may be reduced by delivering at least 1/2 a cubic yard of recyclables. SR 1/8/87 OVER l7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87— A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INCREASING GARBAGE RATES WHEREAS, a Metropolitan Service District (METRO) has announced solid waste disposal increases at dump sites of $2.32 per ton effective April 1, 1987, and WHEREAS, increases in charges to the solid waste disposal franchises for disposal site fees imposed by a governmental agency may be included in consumer rates established by the Council by resolution provided they are evenly distributed among the rates, and WHEREAS, the Utility and Franchise Committee met on March '18, 1987 and reviewed the proposal of the solid waste disposal companies and recommended unanimously that the Council approve an emergency measure to pass a temporary rate increase to cover disposal site fee increases imposed by the Metropolitan Service District pending annual rate review, and WHEREAS, the increase proposed will result in a $.15 per can per month cost to consumers, or $.23 per cubic yard of loose material or $.52 per cubic yard of compacted material, and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need for prompt action to ensure a timely pass through of this government agency imposed operating cost increase; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: The Tigard City Council wishes to increase current garbage franchise collection rates to reflect a complete pass through of increase METRO garbage disposal site fees, to be effective April 1, 1987, and shall continue until Committee review and Council action result in a further rate adjustment. Said increases are reflected in the attached Exhibit "A". PASSED: This day of 1987. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard 3088P RESOLUTION NO. 87— Page 1 ✓ . I • r EXHIBIT "A" SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TIGARD SCHEDULE OF RATES — APRIL 1, 1987 RESIDENTIAL RATES One Can $ 8.25 On Call Service $ 4.10 Two Cans $15.60 Each Additional $ 8.35 COMMERCIAL RATES Number of Cans One Two Three Four Five One $ 8.75 $16.80 $25.05 $33.30 $41.75 Two $16.30 $31.20 $46.60 $62.20 $77.60 Each Additional $ 6.55 $13.10 $19.45 $25.90 $32.35 t br3088P C - RESOLUTION NO. 87— Page 2 i • 6 EXHIBIT "A" (Cont.) CITY OF TIGARD CONTAINER SERVICE - LOOSE Container Size Stops Per Week One Two Three Four Five One Yard 48.43 89.56 128.69 Each Additional One and 1/4 yards 56.49 103.78 148.77 192.46 230.25 Each Additional 50.19 92.28 132.57 171.46 205.25 One and 1/2 yards 64.35 124.10 177.65 225.60 272.75 . Each Additional 58.95 109.10 159.65 201.40 242.45 Two Yard 84.86 160.82 229.48 291.04 351.10 Each Additional 76.76 140.82 196.48 246.84 296.20 Three Yard 109.49 205.38 290.17 364.66 445.95 Each Additional 100.49 190.38 272.27 352.66 430.95 Four Yard 134.02 250.54 365.66 466.78 560.10 Each Additional 126.02 242.54 353.66 458.68 549.20 C.. Five Yard 155.65 300.30 438.05 568.50 682.45 Each Additional 150.45 285.00 415.55 540.60 657.45 Six Yard 172.18 331.16 484.14 626.92 766.10 Each ^Aditional 165.08 319.16 466.04 597.32 728.10 Eight Yard 208.44 399.18 579.72 752.46 913.80 Each Additional 200.14 383.18 555.92 720.56 873.80 CONTAINER SERVICE - COMPACTED Stops Per Week Container Size One Two Three Four Five One Yard 111.82 205.54 294.56 381.18 455.80 Two Yard 169.84 321.88 459.32 582.56 702.90 Three Yard 219.06 411.02 580.98 729.84 892.90 t i RESOLUTION NO. 87- Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" (Cont.) DROP BOX SERVICE Drop Box Size Regular Service Occasional Service 116.80 127.40 Twenty Yard Box 51.10 Rental 4.70/day after 48 hr. 150.70 161.80 Thirty Yard Box 68.20 Rental 6.20/day after 48 hr. MISCELLANEOUS RATES A) Court apartments E) Return for pickup of five or more units inaccessible can $ 7.80 6.55 F) Extra distance —lf 1 stop per week $ per foot after the first 2 stop per week $ 13.10 100 feet 8) Extra garbage per can $ 2.75 C) Call Backs $ 7.80 D) Bundles, boxed refuse, the first 100 ft or bags equivalent amount of one can $ 2.75 wAM:br/3088P t.. RESOLUTION NO. 87— Page 7_Page 4 ,z utility and Franchise Committee Minutes of March 18, 1987 7:30 P.M. — Tigard Civic Center Members Present: Gerry McReynolds, Barbara Osborne, Don Jacobs Ex Officio Members Present: Tom Miller, Mike Leichner, Larry Schmidt Staff Present: John Acker, Bill Monahan The meeting began at 7:30 P.M. Minutes of the February 25 meeting were considered and -approved as written. Bill introduced a request by Tom Millar that the Committee .and Council consider passing a resolution to increase rates to reflect the April 1 MFIRO dumping fees increase. Discussion followed. Gerry stated that the Committee cannot react quickly to a general rate increase request, but to be fair', a pass through of the disposal rate charges should be presented for Council consideration. Gerry suggested that the Committee should eventually restructure the rates. Tom agreed that a total review should be done. Gerry asked that a reevaluation of the rate structure be set as an issue for' Committee consideration in the future. Motion by Barbara, seconded by Dun to t+rt tho item for future consideration. The proposal passed unanimously . The Committee then took action on the rate increase request. Dun made the following motion: A resolution should be presented to the City Council calling for an emergency measure to pass a temporary rate increase to cover' disposal site fee increases imposed by ME-IRO pending annual rate review completion. Barbara seconded the motion, unanimous vote of approval by those members present. The rate increases to be requested are: $ .15 per can per month (from $8.10 to $8.25) . $ .23 per cubic yard of material (loose). $ .52 per cubic yard of material (compacted). The rates reflect the $2.32 per ton increase which METRO will put into offect on April A. Tom noted that the proposed rate increase for Tigard does not include extra cost to the haulers in the form of the franchise fro lhp haulers will pay the City a fee based upon the increased gross revenue. Gerry asked Tom to prepare a new rate table with the methods of calculation of the new rates. The Committee discussed the status of the solid waste rate setting procedure. Gerry reported that he has discussed the Annual Reports with Wayne Lowry. lip C Page 1 t noted that he needs to see the reports to properly review them to doter-mine how the rate setting mechanism works. He asked if the haulers had a problem with the Committee members being issued copies of the report for- review. 'the franchisees agreed that copies should be distributed to members only. Any further request for viewing, at this point, should be referred to the City Attorney. The item was tabled until copies are distributed and the Committee can get with Wayne Lowry. A special meeting was scheduled for Wodnosd,,ky, April 1 at 7:00 P.M. to discuss the reports. John reported on the status of the May 2 clean up day. Fie has dissemin,yted information through the All . About Town and Chamber newsletter. Discussion centered on where pick up will be made, and when. Input has bean roquestod from NPO's and others. Larry suggested that each NPO target two or throe areas for a concentrated clean up. Among the areas to be considrrod ,ars• major streets, areas around schools, vacant lots and dead ends that h.ivk. become neighborhood dumping grounds, and common areas. John will kovp tho Committee posted on progress. Bill explained that the staff liaison responsibility has been shifted to Wavnt• Lowry. The shift was made because the upcoming issues are mostly rolatod to finance. Community Development will still be involved in the clear, tlil day, recycling, handling consumer complaints, and interpreting the solid w.,4!;tr franchise agreement. The meeting concluded at 8:35. A special meeting will be held i»; Wodlivsday . April 1, at 7:00 P.M. At that time a regular meeting time will bo established, including the April regular meeting date. /br3084P Paige 2 CtDuvlct YY�PQti,Yt CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON -/aj�� COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 18, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SCE 13-86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing LANDMARK FORD APPEAL March 161987, PREPARED BY: Keith L.iden DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City, CoinniI POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is modified resolution approvinq.Sign Code Exception SCE 13-86, per City-Council's request. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt resolution. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON C RESOLUTION NO. 87- AN IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A DENIALFINALORDER AES GN UPONCITY YCOUNCIL EXCEPTION REVIEW 3P86) APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION LANDMARK FORD. WHEREAS, this matter before the City Council at its meeting of March 16, 1987, upon filing of an appeal by the applicant on a Planning Commission denial of a Sign Code Exception; and ssion WHEREAS, the City Council had before of the P anne Planning ing1Commi sionlhearing the Planning staff' s report, the transcriptapplicant as part of the application; and and documentation submitted by the app WHEREAS, the applicable criteria in this decision are the following: Chapter 18. 114 of the Tigard Municipal Code WHEREAS, based on the record in this case, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: NE corner SW Section 1: The subject sitesare SW Dartmouth/SW68 h e east side SW 68th Franklin/66th, SE between SW Elmhurst and SW Dartmouth within the corporate limits of Tigard, Oregon. (WCTM 2S1 1AA, Tax Lots 1200, 1301, and 5700) Section 2: The following signs are located in the vicinity of the Landmark Ford property as noted below: Location Dimensions Total-Area Proposed NW corner of Unknown Unknown Removal SW Dartmouth and but small SW 68th SE Corner of SW 4' x 6' 48 sq. ft. Remain at Dartmouth & SW 68th location West side of SW 68th 2' x 3' 6 sq. ft. Moved to east side halfway between of SW 68th Dartmouth & Franklin NE corner of 2' x 4' 16 sq. ft. Remain at SW 68th & Franklin location C RESOLUTION NO. 87- Page 1 Section 3: The applicant states that he wishes only a "temporary sign exception good for 180 days". The sign at the southeast corner C. of Dartmouth and 68th will remain up until the State Highway Division completes their signage for the southbound ramp. The applicant has purchased land which surrounds the Ford facility and will establish direct access from SW 68th to the business. Once such access has been created, there will be no need for the signs. Section 4: The applicant's request is to retain three off premise signs, noted in Section 2 above, that were to be removed as a condition of approval of SCE 2-86. Section 5: Section 18.114.145 sets forth the approval criteria for exceptions to the sign code. The City Council also makes the following conclusions of law: (1) The City Council concludes that the applicant's request for a Sign Code Exception does meet the approval criteria set forth in Section 18.114. 145 of the Tigard Municipal Code and that the Planning Commission denial of the application shall be reversed. (2) The City Council concludes that the off site signs shall be removed by September 1, 1987. The City Council, therefore, orders that the above referenced determination be, and same hereby, is APPROVED. The Council further orders that the City Recorder send a copy of the final order as a notice of final decision in this matter. PASSED: This day of 1987. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard Ci RESOLUTION NO. 87— Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 23, 1987 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Referral to ISS�3`/, CE,1lDA TITLE: Economic Development Committee _ Economic Development Committee Amending Resol ion PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE To Modify Resolution No. 86-135 and repealing Resolution No. 83-101. INFORMATION SUMMARY In follow-up to last week's Council Meeting, this proposal was reviewed by the Economic Development Committee, who agreed with the proposed changes. This attached resolution reflects the changes. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED C FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to approve this resolution modifying Resolution No. 86-135 and repealing Res. No. 83-103. dc:1348p CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: March 23 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: March 20 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Training PREVIOUS ACTION: I�msudgetedRe uests - De ut Recorder & PREPARED BY: Loreeon Records/Court ManaCer ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT HEAD OK POLICY ISSUE Should the Tigard City Council approve training requests which are budgeted items? INFORMATION SUMMARY The Records/Court Manager is budgeted The thend Oregong conferenceisat Court Administrators (OACA) twice a year. Salishan Lodge and will be held April 12th-14th. This is the only organization ganization in Oregon for court personnel. In the past the conferences have proved invaluable in keeping up with current law and mplementation of victim's practices (i.e. arrest warrants, trial process, i rights bill, pending legislation, court consolidation, etc.) The Deputy City Recorder is budgeted to ro rthe International am. This isInstitute the firstof three Municipal Clerks (IIMC) certification p g and will be held in Seattle at the University of years for this program anization available Washington July 19th - 24th. Th'.s is the only training org ast for Recorders. The City m Recorder establish finishehspec specific certificationer k llsupono whichgram the summer. The first-year (i.e. technical rest of the professional development sequence can be builtduties, etc.) writing, records management, communications skills, statutory These training requests were e 4/13/87 received la and age registration deadlines do not allow holding these until ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve both budgeted training requests. 2. Approve one budgeted training request and deny the other. 3. Deny both budgeted training requests. FISCAL IMPACT 1, $560.00 from FY 1986-87. 2. Record/Court Manager - $180.00 6 Deputy Recorder - $380.00 3. $ --0- SUGGESTED ACTION CMotion to approve both budgeted training requests. lw/4587A I i • C17Y OF TIIFA R® EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: 3/17/87 Requested by: Nadi nP Rnhi nann Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: OACA [ , ] Employee request attend Linn County Courts [ ( ] Employer required attend P.O. Box 1179 For check run of Albany, OR 97321 ( ] Mail check 00 Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: cal i gha.,__T.nrlga PAYABLE TO: P-0- Sox 11R _ G1c-ntmr1Pn Reach. nR A73RR Title of Program: Oregon Assoc for Court Admi n Spring rnnfPYPnr-P Institution or organization GACA Registration Deadline 3/27/87 Training Dates From: 4/12IR7To: 4/14/R'7 Describe the purpose: Semi-annual educational conference for court administrators. Areas of interest: Warrants, Video/Mock Trial; Work Redesign; Union & Collective Bargaining; Legislation Review; Is thiserela edn oe IX currrenElposition r[t �o �ga�.��ti�motion or transfer? Explain: Provides training related to my responsibilities as Court myager. TRAINING COSTS: [ X] . to be advanced [-74] to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition.. .... ... ................ 10-1300-62-50-0 S40.00 Books................. ..... . .. .. ................ Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . 10-1300-62400 30.00 �c Lodging... ................... . .. ... ........... .. 10-1300-62400 90.00 Per Diem....................................... . 10-1300-62400 20.00 Other: Total $ 180.00 Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures made on my .behalf. Employee Signature:�ir.�� oDate .3 i81�7 � !o a Appropriation balance: 9-1-4y O Manager: Ql�. [X ] approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Head: ( J approved [ J disapproved (explain): i Finance Director: 0 M 1 O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O • • • O O Ln O 00 O M 111 >� 111 f� 111 111 � th th t!f O N th V> O ro � a� o w C wv ..y coC .i M a) £ C N O CN U iJ •• iJ ot O Lr] H O ro LL U I O w (aro O; �+ 11) W a a N W O N C u' E U � H C I H (1)r z o c auroi 1., o) o o 04c C zrn -+ Ori c co 0 o at n, : u 1;4 ,t x+•s+ CO c .c o 3 z•.r a) o{ ► >J •. W 11 'tl . y : itA O > .1 U o0 ca aw E-4 sc IU+ d' a) H >+ a) y UO •• �'�J4i+ 5,: r'•Of z c .0,4 � H •• H o: y a� •� v, to CD £ N o to IIJ � - ,., 04 U H L 44 '0 F i 1 •1 AC • a N N 1D £ w .i U O Cl) c 'v o cma Cl 00 x x C4 :3 ri ^ w e (oH w >• 1-1 O o c a w 4) O a) �-+ 47 � rn w o -+ a �+ s o c� O D U m w E z <,�� £ C: C? -4 1r co a �+ 3 in 3 3 H O w c a x a >vrn - ro H O c M = G]w•.4 .i N < z U w •r♦ x O z c a -,--4 u, ,,.., E4 O to " ro 1 , E.., .-i I • a Z C4 y 1— to r 'o•r1 >r KC w W (a 0014 a) (VyroN £ z•.drn > a0 OU � wtO Doa JH N N '0 I u (a () Cf) Cf) O w ro 1] H H4+ a O a C `0 �, £ O r-1 W H .N f� =DO > mC14 E d •4/••1 £ c< In In 0� •.- f.1 w JJ 1 >4 >+ a) w z A7 N a) r- w w Si >+H .4 OH m >J U C 1�!) c(0 E m 4 fn 1N•1 6 d C £ a t �,'U a) OU 10 04 a rn a EF 3 OC� o (1) dUU COm CO fC $4 E C 4 to O rn z to A '0 y 0 a) C SN.+ H E D U C07 a u) i.i Cc7 00,5 H f V ro ..Ni '0 ro t� w O < H o5 £ a) —4 c £ LWazxO O "{ a) > O O w =) O O • 'o �1 c°'i o � m � � `�' � z a U i ro z > sem 41 0 o >4 Lt COAj si " � m to d O v O £ a w O •• In •. •• O aJ (1) tot) 0 C13 w {.,, N w yr- 7 a) 0) ro E O H N 0o N .-1 —4 a) d O D O rn cjr-+ Z U d CL Z E r1••� ro ro d C17YOF T11FARD EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: March 11, 1987 Requested by: Cathy Wheatley Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: Univergity of Washington [ X] Employee request attend Conference Registration ( ) Employer required attend _ University of Washington Ext. GH-25 For check run of 3/20/87 Seattle, WA 98195 [ ) Mail check [ X ] Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaa=aaaaasaaaaasia:asaaaaaaaaaaaasaasaa-- ��aaaaaaaasaa� Title of Program: 1987 Certification Seminar for Northwest Munic 1 Clerks Institution or organization University of Washington Registration Deadline 14-1-591 Training Dates From: 7/19/87 To: 7 24 8 Describe the purpose: First seminar in a series of three as part of certification program set forth by the International Institute of Municipal Clerks. Course of study includes communication skills, technical writing, records mgmt., statutory duties. Is this related to [ X ) current position [ ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: Valuable as ongoing training process as duties for Deputy Recorder a position. TRAINING COSTS: [ x ] to be advanced [ ) to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... 10-12300-625-00 205.00 Books.. • . ...... .. ...... ... . .......... ... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... Lodging... .:....... ........... .. ................ 10-12300- 24-00 Per Diem.....:..... ............................ . Other: Total $ 380.00 gaga:aaaaacs=a.ay.oaaavaaaaaaaaaaaxaasaaasaaaaaasaaaaaaaesaxaaaaa==e.caca=sasaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditu es made on my behalf. Employee Signature: Date3 m/"v7 Appropriation glance: 77.Hanager:_Lj,�- �) approved ( ] disapproved Dept. Head: _ [ ] approved [ ] disapproved (explain): Mode of transportation may be the train -- their rates are prPngntly $3n-5n l or round trip to 5eattle. If this training is approved I would like to ` go ahead and pay for train Ea—c-R—eE Ea—c——eon my own and request reimbursement lat ease note lodging includes all buttwo or three meals. oc> c !! may/ P79 7-88 Finance Director: 1987 l Certificate®n Seminars f®r Northwest mumcipal Clerks July 19-24 Professional Development I Aug. 2-7 Professional Development II CAug. 9-14 Professional Development III j University of Washington I Sponsored by: � Graduate School of Public Affairs n Conference Management,UW Extension i l International Institute of Municipal Clerks Washington Municipal Clerks Association a s t 7 The IIMC requires the following distribution of the 100 student/instructor contact hours over three major curricula areas,which the GSPA will cover in Professional Development Seminars I.Ii,and 111. 1. 50 hours in Public Administration,including: a. Administrative/Management:planning,scheduling,coordination,de- cision making,problem solving,time management,priority setting b. Changing Nature of Governments:intergovernmental and intra- governmental functions and relations c. Concepts and Practices of Municipal Fiscal Policy.Municipal Law, Urban Planning.Municipal Personnel Administration 2. 30 hours in Social and Interpersonal Concerns: a. Personal and Professional Development cognitive skills—memory. analytic skills,psychological development—coping with stress and change,increasing knowledge of yourself and your effect on others: ethics:values:and attitudes b. Human Relations:dealing with staff,citizens,council,mayor,group dynamics:social trends:changing society c. Interpersonal Communications:ability to understand and be under- stood by other people.verbal communications.active listening 3. 20 hours of Electives,selected by state,provincial or regional associa- tions to provide for specific needs for special skills and knowledge: a. Specific skills in Accounting.Budgeting,Election Administration, Ordinance Drafting.Records Management Supervision b. Current challengesiproblems indigenous to a particular geographical area c. Written communication,including reports,agenda preparation,coun- cil proceedings,etc. d. Community and public relations with special emphasis for a particular area 3 x4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 1987 FROM: Marcha K. Huntylte . SUBJECT: BEAVERTON-TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SESSION As I discussed with you on Friday, Beaverton's City Recorder contacted Loreen Wilson to set up a time for a joint meeting with the Councils. The dates clear on Mayor Cole's calendar are Tuesday, April 7; Tuesday, April 14; and Thursday, April 16. As I indicated, April 16 is scheduled for Doris Hartig's coommunity retirement recognitiion dinner at the Hi Hat Restaurant. Of those members polled on Friday (March 20), April 14 was acceptable to Mayor Brian, Councilors Eadon and Johnson; Councilor Edwards had a conflict on that date and prefers April 7; I was unable to contact Councilor Schwartz. Councilor Edwards suggested that a meeting date be discussed at the March 23 Council Meeting. /h C s- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 1987 FROM: Marcha K. Hun// - SUBJECT: JUNE 26-28 COUNCIL WORKSHOP I have checked with various facilities in the Portland area and it seems that all are booked for weddings, etc. for the month of June. I have, however, tentatively booked Silver Falls Conference Center for that weekend. It sounds as if the facility would be to your liking--we can even schedule special menus if that is your desire. I am attaching copies of information for your review. Please let me know as soon as possible if this facility is acceptable and I will initiate a deposit payment. Thank you. /h Attachments i i i i B Department of Transportation VICTOR ATVEH PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION GOVEMM Silver Falls State Park-20024 Silver Falls Hwy SE-Sublimity,OR 97385 (503) 873-8681 March 19, 1987 Marsha Hunt City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - Dear Ms. Hunt: Space at Silver Falls Conference Center has been reserved for your group of 8 on June 26-28, 1987. Enclosed is a packet of booking informatico. Please complete the Conference Booking Agreement and return it with your confirmation deposit by April 17, 1987. This will confirm your reservation. Sixty days prior to the start of your conference, an additional guarantee deposit is due and should be sent in with the yellow forms. Adjustments from the number originally reserved for may be made at this time. Your final billing will be based on the guarantee figure. If you wish, you may issue a purchase order in lieu of the cash deposits, and I will bill you following the session. Some things to keep in mind while planning your conference: LODGING: Upper Smith Creek Cabins, double occupancy bedrooms, have been reserved for your group. Single occupancy bedrooms are available for reser- vation with advance notice. An additional fee of $9 per night will be char- ged for single rooms. Your meeting area will be Upper Smith Creek Meeting Hall. MEALS: Meals are served cafeteria style in the dining hall. Normal meal ti s are: Breakfast-7:30 AM, Lunch-12:00 Noon, and Dinner-5:30 PM. Please let me know if these times are not satisfactory, or if anyone in your group has special dietary requirements. We are looking forward to your stay at the Conference Center. If you have any questions or need special accommodations, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Jose p iegerich Con r nce Center Manager jm Enclosures 7U10.1S47A SILVER FALLS CONFERENCE CENTER 20024 SILVER FALLS HWY SE SUBLIMITY, OR 97385 TELEPHONE (503) 873-8681 ! 4 RATS SCHEDULE f Daily Rate $37.50 per person (Double Occupancy) i The daily rate for conference center guests includes breakfast, lunch, dinner, use of meeting rooms and audio visual equipment, overnight accommodations (double occupancy) , linen and housekeeping services. A breakdown of these costs follows: Breakfast $4.50 Lunch $4.50 Dinner $8.00 Overnight (double occupancy) $20.50 Single occupancy bedrooms are available at an additional fee of $9.00 per night, when space permits. The Conference Center facilities may also be scheduled for day ! r" meetings. The daily rate for use of the specific building is indicated below: Meeting Hall (capacity 100) $100.00 Dining Hall (capacity 90) $75.00 Upper Smith Creek (capacity 30) $60.00 Unit Lodge (capacity 16-18) $60.00 These are charges for Day Use Groups. All recreational facilities and equipment are available to all conference center guests at no additional charge. Maximum overnight capacity is 56. � I INSTRUCTIONS FOR ROOM ASSIGNMENTS 1. Designate 1 person in your group to fill out the room assign- " ment sheet.Write legibly. PARKING 2. The buildings reserved for you have been circled.As you hand a� out the keys, write the person's name in the corresponding j space. FIRE PIT 3. Assign 2 people per room,unless you have arranged for single rooms. Remember: Single occupancy is an extra charge per i night. RACCOON CABIN 4. Once everyone has checked in with you,turn in the completed sheet to the kitchen staff. ADM. ALDER LODGE BUILDING CHICKAREE 5. Instruct your participants to return their keys to you at the ' CABIN close of the session.When you have collected all of the keys, BLUEBERRY LODGE a turn them in to the kitchen staff. THANKS FOR THE ASSISTANCEI ACTIVITY FIELD . DINING HALL TURN OVER FOR ROOM ASSIGNMENTS (CEDAR LODGE I I DOGWOOD LODGE SMITH CREEK O MEETING HALL WOOD SHED VOLLEYBALL COURT �� ^0 HORSESHOE PITS RESTROOM 7: SWIMMING POOL 6 4 7 5 2 UPPER SMITH CREEK PARKING MEETING HALL •��✓�� / f 0 75 ISO 300 _ FEET t i i t 30 Numerous recreational opportunities are available at the Conference Center. Recreation checkouta equipment other items, Paulyour DeShawenjoyment, are available RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AVAILABLE Swimming pool (unheated) Outdoor f re pi t ----. Volleyball Court Horseshoe pits Hiking and biking trails RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT Volleyball and net Horseshoes Croquet set Frisbees Bicycles (4) 4 Ping pong table, paddles and balls Pool table, balls and cues Games: Scrabble, backgammon, Monopoly, puzzles, Pinochle and Standard card decks and poker chips. OTHER ITEMS AVAILABLE Video Cassette Recorder and television (must supply own cassettes) Identification books on birds, wildflowers and native trees • O. d C O d .0 c p t C O` N NCry d - •=O � 0 b a�,o 3 E c 0 E - T j bpi �- O Q Q: M b O` 6. O u � M d W >. v O c > z o L ie w- M d Zu Z > > O aci W s 0 ° y _ U a 'v UZ U T p � o b d 0c, W _ w d c .� o c Ln N U � w p a Cl. }, > o b ,e «. d d u Z L O p o yf, 7 °� iN°O° c C 7 O en d C iti OC G C >, N C _ U- 00 O C E E > U W v L >• c o 0 00 Z � u"- cpn °� O E 0 � � a m V � OZ M ;, r cvi o > �' o to F- v a s N n N Z s _ J W Q= �N, E Y u c aui �• _ — ° v v aZi ' N tpt,���°; �e I.L. C7 N N y C C Q. N •� Y C Ea� E w W .0 co mJ0 p u W v oo E F o 0 3 -O o = W o f ` V d d 00 t Z y ca n. Y W d N E CD CL .0 z 040- 3 Z o 0 0 u v c Y O o c i H ei O A ai �> > d t/1 c W t y d c m c re W 7p O c Z o b O b 'u W a u C C ), bale d T•u d A c a E '� C 7 d r t•Op Y p y'E o u E _.•x u a d c E 3 osU� c u p ai eo E rem C Q1M 'a. V- >' dN p " O vvU bF-v :: 0 d p E> p " N p a > > �Nv p EM >- cam t $E E o d E a d Y c E M Q C c r` aCi Od0 b w �^= C_ � �. b0 0 d p O ,d-,VaO O O H n- p LL. ~wO °� U p d c w u b = c u 0 u N n c U '- �.. c ` N :3 =�M = O c c ° �' a> > c a to LL co T ^ by oo ac, �, O..> ` N V 0 — p ` v d o N d V A > Y .D t �- p� b d N C ewe p p N V LL u u .. 3 T N O d c > ¢ R '.s w $ c ,a+ Q SMCdQ•S.3e Y.�Lvau� HOv .�>uy.�•0w A - L0u oC eae- robb . c. M>—y ,3,•pv`3i t{a�,i� '3°O XaCni, u�doNbpe0 1Ed—C>C,=-p«roaQ� ws a4N p Ytp O - O 0 UU a p O E wOOpYV co p CL oa .0 o auw uO E Nd'* i 0 O 0 E C � AMta~Cdvp ; oMCE O v'°LE c cgs d = tO C 0 A° o E ab E op oo EO I W5 roY Z En n 2 > DEc ZcoY °' o O ' cAJ c c" : C O p npc . ° W r- ie O i ,J d06 Cd E '0O O O c°db>'4 u 0 O >� CL _ W N EOC � O ° bcedd U w0b0% p . ea� b CL CdJVUa0NV O a W C W W U. cd ¢L < Em _j.0 , � C� uNAd �I i i t/1 ` J Y l } ce- LL ce u.► LU U i 0 J U F- N N LU c O O Q w z L o LU � c ¢ L o 0 _ J co � - v1 to N N 3 Q Z N N N W J ¢ to C .c } O ro j NX �- E W �t O X O .. Do L O E06 E a OC d n CL W 3 to c '" Y c d E O E Z en = c 3 ,o E b F E >' w N d c ¢ °' %IV- E U - Lai d c X NN LLJLL d' A N �. ''' b O J V . N c E p p o en 3, o Yo ppC T Q J uuj in L Z N ye a d L N LL V Loo d C ° W Z U. Z C T ,a EY c N o d d � V X go U c 3•3 S v - 3 d in p •' °.' u n mW O p ro v ;; to 2 - } a� f6 c n > J E r V O N .%. r = C N O dD to .� CA U. ro c - 3 v+ a� d N 3 '^ Y •O E O OC W ro t E y LL t o c S d C 1d U F-_ O ro ro u C O 'N Lp Y ` N LL E _ •v+ C •'� E .O L O C J A " Odc� o b p �0 -0 E pc o Ono O 2wN :Ikn C to 0 T U� HLi le � C ao o7 � 0 Q > z 4 en N E b Q ✓ C -0 i V1 LL. N L00C u .J O u N — N <L T u G 7 O Loo .� E OC O C vi 0— o u. gE d o t~V� c E H o VN u o .0 o O O CL ¢m Odb u. c9 i E a , p O pE oC -19 . t a OC f„ F.. : • u. • • • • h ro LL. • • ON REQUEST: Extra Per Person: SILVER FALLS CONFERENCE CENTER Country Cinnamon Rolls, $1 25 20024 Silver Falls Hwy SE Danish,and Pastries Pie-per Slice $125 Sublimity,OR 97385 Coffee,Tea,Herb Tea-per Serving •25 Telephone(503)873-8681 ---------------- IN ADDITION... Weight Watcher and Vegetarian meals are pre- RATE SCHEDULE:. pared at no extra charge with advance notice. Daily Rate—$37.50 Per Person —————_ ————--—— (Double Occupancy) The DeShaw House Company has 24 years of experience preparing fine foods and looks for- ward to assisting you and your group in planning for that ,Special Event". Our meals are served buffet style and include a The daily rate for Conference Center gues s includes breakfast,lunch,dinner, use of meeting rich variety of imaginatively prepared dishes.Food rooms and audio visual equipment, vernight r service is considered an integral part of our pro- accommodations (double occupancy), linen and gram, complementing and enhancing the con- housekeeping service• ference atmosphere. a; BON APPETITE! - ———————————————— A breakdown of these costs follows: i i BREAKFAST $ 4.50 LUNCH $ 4.50 DINNER $ 8.00 I OVERNIGHT $20.50 (Double Occupancy) Single occupancy bedrooms are available at an g additional fee of $9.00 per night, when space permits. i E Your hosts, Paul &Emily DeShaw,welcome your• DINNER: Extra Per Person: group and extend their friendly hospitality and Choice Prime Rib $3.50 delicious meals in a casual country inn atmo- Beef Wellington $5.00 sphere. Chateau Briand $7.50 w/Bernaise Sauce(Limit 25) Scampi $6.50 Salmon w/Hollandaise $4.50 Choice Tenderloin—8 oz. $3.50 Choice Top Sirloin—8 oz. $3.00 4�. Veal Oscar $3.50 �i ` t Some of our chef's gourmet dining selections, BAR-B-Q SPECIALTIES: prepared at your group's request, are listed Pacific Salmon $5.00 below. (In Season Only) Choice Tenderloin $4.00 ———————————---— —— 8oz. Choice Top Sirloin $3.50 10 oz. MENU SELECTIONS: Oregon Grown Chicken $1.25 BREAKFAST Extra Per Person: t Eggs Benedict $1.50 -- ---- -------- -- j Country French Ham&Cheese Crepes, Croissants,Fresh Fruit $1.50 HORS D'OEUVRES: Extra Per Person: ——— — — Vegetable Garden $1.50 ——————————— Cheese&Cracker Tray $1.50 Nachos w/Guacamole $1.50 LUNCH Extra Per Person: Fresh Fruit Plate $1.50 Taco Salad $1.25 (In Season) Crab Louis $2.75 Antipasto— $2.50 Shrimp Louis $2.50 A Selection of... Philadelphia Steak $1.50 Marinated Mushrooms, Salami, Pepperoni, Salmon w/Hollandaise $2.50 Provelone, Mozzarella, Olives, Italian Peppers, Chefs Salad Deluxe $1.00 etc. 1 r .. __� .•._.�..__�.__�. ..�-_. y.o c -_.�o.. ._. . Eco nc � °>, ,°.v C • N .�. �v nc nE V� u E } �L p C j = C Yj u q= c• u L L E,S SE 0. I vU = O Z O LJ I Z EW -- cU g c Wec W ° .u W ,zI. int Eav GJ�Og� oC < Sl7iL f�� E - = - EUu y ` z��aV LE _ yam $t� Qo j° o> acy aa3y5E•dy tL yovoc} / y -j E > o c x 3 J �=i E E R ` C - u.n - �g 'c�o of _ - E 'C=° Vi c.: 3 E o V 3 I'm n o _ E y'- �® y� _ 's��s� �'- ®© ;a'c O ti pC A u cc —V Y c = y E-� ;•'��v o X v h XW v LU 0 cc y=n - .E2r2Z c j C Y C G 9 v J ac ;�•a ._ iS y w ^' C s oc _ _ Y F d Z• V Q J V L J Y°.�W�u XE I w ��� ,► Q (.L., V1 I w a g \ 1 •IIS �• \' 1 0 6 > W Ln 13 W a : I -i O V) Q ~N rN-W Cc V J 0 m n Place Stamp Here SILVER FALLS STATE PARK 20024 Silver Falls Highway SE Sublimity, OR 97385 Attention: Conference Center Manager n F° aNa °ca go Nn oNNz-i �< ?n°^ OD - ..� Z> z`23 ` 3�1.' cTn n �9• S'�2c�o a^>> Mgr 3a2 �_° e A N3 w'^ � �• NKN 7C Ase^• -••°:�o, ,�nnx ° �. g.�W > - - 3°. A R. aAm-�• 0 n> _ T E c e d°^ ^^ =a�N? f,n o' '�oM=75 Y.M^� n�Y'. dP^ a P..� O-0 n j .. ^ 9.. n^ y^ •^"e �.e M en ��.� �a'o^^ :.Mg�n A irwnR�`3 wNeq°.^, �.",^d mo=o °."F'" ^5•"'3 `_r 3=.? ^e Fa < 29 ew ^- ^�"• Ped F•° �'c,o °..3 ET,^�„ c<pm' 9 °�kw s voce °n ^dvo 'o' •• k..iii- Mt_^p ^ ^ -e ?G^fea n, a d S 9 ^ �nC77 ..`^x.6.it 06 �e�Me= =—ems g '9. ?^3 rJ'� eue.�w �3y ^n tiZ 9C Pn G'�P"�g.' �e�Y�nin •�O1 rte• N63 �<C^° 6w�5 v Zww S. B O Rn Y:NSGn�K R v'PA 3PS' ^e^^•�y^; °' ^N ^n o E�s� ae�^ 5•�Q resQ qo �_ -°.^• >a�� =.off^�� : ° w O•o •$ =y � �,F� o'a c; ^no n�isz n�`TJg3. c�� � R `R iC°�.!i '^��_�O 5. S'vo� Q�3�$ f,�6Yg'3 cfo�° c� o>S4'o oecorl �R � >>C'3 R�.S i:c^ nr a ooR N� 2°•n 52 Seo..R n^ N3°pk IVS< ego •"R Z. xv� vie =r n - n� 3 Fr n<�3 ii aHn�.. ^in�,4`i noon so.Pi o`^ %s %K= n7Ss �Esc�a s, °-• ro - { o XGA Im m > 7 Ln 00 r 9 n x o o '�'•1 z CmC211n•' z aDD '•\ £ > pr O>F-+ � SNC \\` Z F m ••� ra >0>x 1` i �•1 > rA > N / N 1 0 d � A o°n o A nT x z 3> ��^A • / AAC O S C, j,/ v, �n •'�//y lam' 2 O� x / >m 1 �V/ n Z^ x SILVER FALLS CONFERENCE CENTER SILVER FALLS STATE PARK 20024 SILVER FALLS SUBLIMITY, OR HIGHWAY SE 97385 TELEPHONE: (503) 873.8681 NAME STREET STATE ZIP CITY TELEPHONE: ❑ Please reserve accommodations in conference center No. of Guests Arrival Date Departure Date ❑ Please send additional information on: _ Overnight Camp Ranches — Group Camps Silver Creek — Day Use Conference Center