Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Packet - 01/26/1987
8. DURHAM ROAD JURISDICTION REQUEST - RESOLUTION NO., 87-13 Jo/Ed UA RECESS COUNCIL MEETING 10:01 PM 9. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD 10.1 Call To Order 6 Roll Call All Board Members Prevent 10.2 Approval Of Contract - Aerial Mapping - $25,000 Ea/Ed UA 10.3 Adjournment: 10:09 PM RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING 10:09PM 10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: Ea/Jo UA 10.1 Approval of Council Minutes: January 12, 14, 1987 10.2 Receive & File: a Monthly Departmental Reports 10.3 Call Public Nearing - 67th i Atlanta R-0-41 Vacation - Res.N87-14 11. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 11.1 Park Plan Update - Ea verbal report 11.2 Parking Restrictions - SW Walnut Place Ord 87-05 2-hour Parking - Ea/Ed UP Ord 87-06 Prohibited Parking - Ea/Jo UP 11.3 Training Requests Chief of Police - $382 Martin/Wheeler - $405 Fischer/Myers/Schober/Merrill - $440 All Requests Approved 11.4 Pro-Tem Judge Appointments Apps to be filed with Mayor for Exec Session in Feb. RECESS REGULAR MEETING: 10:27 PM 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:31 PM under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 14. ADJOURNMENT: 11:20 PM lw/4492A " COUNCIL MEETING UPDATE - JANUARY 26, 1987 - PAGE 2 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 - 6:27 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon (arrived 6:28 p.m.), Jerry Edwards, Valerie Johnson, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police (arrived 7:00 p.m.); Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Loreen Wilson, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESS3MM - Transportation Advisory Committee Workshop with City Council. a. Transportation Committee members present: David Funk, Bonnie Owens, Joe Schweitz, and Thomas Sullivan. b. The Committee requested City Council direction and suggested the Committee need to be more involved with the Neighborhood Planning Organizations. COUNCILOR EADON ARRIVED: 6:28 PM C. City Engineer requested direction be given to Staff and the Transportation Advisory Committee from Council in developing the CIP and the Interim Public Facilities Plan. The timeline set out for the CIP program to be completed was by the end of March, 1987. This would be an 18-month CIP list. The Interim Public Facilities Plan would be prepared by February or March of 1988 and would include a 5--year plan. d. Council, staff, and the Committee discussed at some length the lack of information going back and forth between each other. The Committee noted difficulty in determining whether their role was to study local or regional transportation issues. The Committee expressed their inability to obtain a quorum in attendance at meetings to be able to conduct business. e. City Administrator noted that staff will be contacting members who have served on the Committee to determine if they are interested in reappointment. He noted that staff should be able to complete the process during the spring of 1987. f. City Administrator noted that one of the City Council's major goals, from their January 24 Workshop, was a Transportation Plan. He noted that Regional Planning was being coordinated; the Mayor was taking the lead with assistance from the City Engineer. g. It was the consensus of the Council, staff and the Committee that the arterial and collector systems would be impacted by the work the Mayor and City Engineer were doing regionally. It was also agreed that the Transportation Committee should focus on the transportation system within the planning confines of Tigard. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 h. The City Administrator suggested a narrower focus by the Transportation Committee to arterial and collector streets, the 18-month and 5-year CIP. The local issues, such as potholes, inadequate signage, etc. , should be handled through the Neighborhood Planning Organizations up to the Planning Commission and then on to the Council. CHIEF OF POLICE ARRIVED: 7:00 pm i. Discussion continued regarding the policies, agenda and workplan for the Committee as well as the structure of the Committee. Council noted that staff needs to initiate the agendas and take the lead in describing and presenting facts. The Council requested that the Committee determine tough policy issues such as funding of the CIP needs. The Council agreed the Committee Chairman, with the City Engineer, would review a resolution for restructuring prior to it being presented to the City Council. j . Mayor Brian reminded the Committee members that all of their meetings are public meetings under the Oregon Public Meeting Act and would need to, therefore, have published meeting notices and also minutes recorded at each meeting. k. The Committee members advised Council that the next meeting they were going to hold in February would be changed to the second Thursday due to some scheduling concerns the Committee had. COUNCIL. RECESSED: 7:28 PM COUNCIL RECONVENED: 7:44 PM 3. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Councilor Eadon requested that Item .1 would be a Park Plan update. b. City Administrator noted items hand carried to the meeting and submitted the following items for Non-Agenda consideration: .2 Parking Restrictions on S.W. Walnut Place .3 Training Requests .4 Pro-Tem Judge Appointments 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Mr. John Drennan, 11495 S.W. Greenburg Road, Tigard, appeared and requested to be heard regarding the Janis youth care facilities. Mayor Brian suggested Mr. Drennan should appear on February 9th, when the Janis Youth Care Facility has been scheduled for an appeal public hearing. Mayor Brian noted it would inappropriate for Council to consider evidence or any statements prior to that hearing time. 5. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 7-86 NOW OCCUPATIONS (Tabled from 12/15/86 for further information.) a. Mayor Brian reopened the public hearing. Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 b. Community Development Director outlined the history of the issue to date. He noted that the revisions to the Home Occupation chapter of the Community Development Code (Chapter 18. 142) had received Planning Commission recommendation for revision in three broad areas: 1. The expansion of the Purpose Statement in Section `r 18.142.010. 2. The creation of two new categories of Home Occupations; that is, Type I and Type II which differentiate between intensities of use associated with home occupations. 3. New permitting and public hearings procedures for Type II Home Occupation Permits. These three broad areas broke down into eight separate issues which City Council and Staff discussed as follows: Issue 1: Should the City continue the policy of non-regulation of babysitters or, require registration or, review them as a Type II home occupation? Issue 2: Home Parities: if regulated, what standards should be used? Issue 3: Is the use of an accessory building for Type II home occupations acceptable? Issue 4 Should paid, non-resident employees be allowed with a Type II home occupation permit? Issue 5 Should the use of an additional vehicle, such as a van or light pick-up truck be allowed in addition to those vehicles normally associated with the residence for a Type II home occupation? Issue 6: Should any signage be allowed for home occupations in residential areas? For home occupations in commercial and industrial zones? P Issue 7: Should visitors, customers, clients and deliveries be allowed to visit a Type II home occupation and, if so, at what frequency? Issue 8: Whether to require notification of home occupation renewals to surrounding property owners within 250 feet of the subject property. ;. a' C. Public Testimony o Patti Fleming, 10060 S.W. Katherine Street, Tigard, appeared and requested the City allow more than two customers per hour. She noted she was the sole support of herself and her household by having a hair dressing salon in her home. She is zoned residential, but is next door to an industrial area. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 Ott, 9055 S.W. Edgewood, Tigard, represented himself and o Garry No. 4. He expressed concern was speaking specifically to Issue be that the residential areas be tloyees beingted and s allowed oand the ec better with no non-residents em P property. This would assure the maintenance of the residential character of the neighborhood. He also stated having nonly to on- character ot residential, paid sp farmais ynoise but also lincreased epoees would be dsrutivenveh cle traffic neighborhood issues. could pose traffic safety o Dorene Thomas (no ting address given) questioned whether Iba and twhat in the home was currently considered a Type were nine children in the home. would be required if the.-e siness cen Community Development Director repliedtiona would ucurrentlyl besa would be required and the Home e m applications each year. Type I. This would require new p d. Public Nearing Closed. e, After lengthy discussion, the Council arrived at the following lements of the issue. They consensus on the eight separate noted there was lack of support for Type II Issues Council consensus was to continue the policy of non-regulation of baby received, then those complaints sho-sitters and noted that if complaints were uld be sent to the Community Development Director. Issue 2: Council consensus was to not regulate home parties. They did note that it would be a violation if a distributor held a home party in her own home without a Home Occupation Permit. Issue 3: Council consensus was to not allow more than 25% of the total square footage for both the residence and accessory building, whether it be attached or detached, to be occupied for home occupations. Issue 4: Council consensus was that paid, non-resident employees should not be allowed for a home occupation permit. Issue 5: The Council wished to take no action in this area as it would be, basically, unenforceable. Issue 6: Council consensus was that no signage should b allthat �or for home occupations in residential areas, . City commercial and industrial zonnSel signage n should l draftlanguagewhc h would Council requested Legal Cou give better Code definition of what grandfathered rights were is far as home occupations. Staff noted that, preexisting, non- being interpreted as anything that was a P the date the Code went into effect. conforming use prior to Issue 7: Council consensus was to leave the existing Code as it 3 is without change. Page 4 - COUNCIL. MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 Issue 8: Council consensus was to only give notification of home occupation renewal requests to surrounding property owners within 250 feet of the subject property if complaints had been received during the prior permit year on the individual business. f. Mayor Brian expressed his appreciation to the staff for the amount of time that had been spent on the issue noting that it was a difficult one to resolve. g. City Administrator stated staff would develop the appropriate paperwork to bring back for Council review and action in the near future. He also stated that staff would be working with Patti Fleming to resolve her concerns. 6. PUBLIC HEARING — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-86 CITY OF TIGARD Review Planning Commission's recommendation to modify the Tigard Comprehensive Plan designation for S.W. Riverwood Lane from a minor collector street to a local street on the Transportation Map. Also, to redesignate 108th Avenue, north of Dover Landing to Durham Road, from a local street to a minor collector. a. Public Hearing Opened. b. No declarations or challenges were filed. C. City Engineer outlined the history of the request noting that NPO #6 had suggested a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation for River-wood Lane from a minor collector to a local street. The City staff felt it was appropriate to consider 108th Avenue also in conjunction with Riverwood Lane. He noted the Planning Commission approved the proposal to amend the Transportation Map. d. Public Testimony _ Proponents o Mic McDonald, 9740 S.W. Riverwood Lane, Tigard, Oregon noted that he was representing the Riverwood Homeowners' Association and that they were in support of reclassification of Riverwood Lane, but continued to oppose any connection to 108th Avenue. o Lyle Rose, 16360 S.W. Woodcrest, Tigard, Oregon, noted he supported the recommendation of City staff and Planning Commission. o Waneta Chamberlain, 16720 S.W. 108th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon presented a petition from residents along 108th Avenue. The petition noted that 108th Avenue should be designated as a local street continuously from Durham Road all the way to the Tualatin River for various reasons. The petition was dated January 26, 1987. o Norman Harker, from Alpha Engineering, 1750 S.W. Skyline Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97221, stated that he represented- Ranier Bank and other developers in the area and supported the reclassification of Riverwood Lane. 3 Page 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 26, 1987 . x r,� �.�-�., "�' .�"`"` �.. srat...,a�'A��ak aa.�e'ti zVc+.tia.a�"Cs.`•'r" `r �.� e'; � o Richard Olson, 16245 S.W. Copper Creek, Tigard, Oregon stated he supported the reclassification but could not support the connection of 108th to Riverwood Lane. o The City Recorder noted, for the record, that a letter had been received from Kenneth L. Waymire, 10185 S.W. Riverwood Lane stating his support of the reclassification of Riverwood Lane and the accompanying conditions. o Chief Lehr stated the Police Department's recommendation was in support of the reclassification of Riverwood Lane and 108th Avenue. e. City Engineer recommended approval and noted Planning Commission's recommendation of approval. He also reported that the decision for the connection of Riverwood Lane to 108th had already been made and approved by the Council previously in another action taken late last year. f. Public Hearing Closed. g. ORDINANCE NO. 87-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP (CPA 11-86). h. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. PUBLIC HEARING — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-86 CITY OF TIGARD NPO #7 Review Planning Commission's recommendation to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation for 135th Avenue, from the Murray Boulevard extension to Scholls Ferry Road, from a major collector to a minor collector street on the Transportation Map. a. Public Hearing Opened. b. No declarations or challenges were filed. C. City Engineer noted the history of the 135th Plan Designation from Murray Boulevard to Scholls Ferry Road. He reported that with the result of the Murray Boulevard Extension, much of the traffic volume originally anticipated for 135th Avenue would be diverted to Murray Boulevard. As a result, the existing major collector standard could be changed to a minor collector street; this would allow for a slightly narrower pavement width (40 feet vs. 44 feet). d. Public Testimony — No one appeared to speak. e. Community Development Director recommended approval on the Comprehensive Plan Designation of 135th Avenue as approved by the Planning Commission. f. Discussion followed between staff and Council regarding the cost of construction. City Engineer noted there would be about a five percent difference in the overall cost of construction of 135th Page 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 26, 1987 LID. He reported that the right-of-way width would be the same; however, the improved right-of-way would be slightly less. ORDINANCE NO. 87-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD 912-86).COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP (CPA 12-8b ' h. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to adopt. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 9-86 RUSS KRUEGER 8, PUBLIC HEARING -- ZONE mmendation to amend Section Review Planning Commission's reco 18.54.040.040, 18.56.040, and 18. Care of the Tigard Community Development Code to allow Children's Day Care as a Conditional RU25 permitted in the R-12 (Multi-Family Residential, R units/acre),- amily (Multi-Family Residential, 25 units/acre), Residential, 40+ units/acre) zoning districts. a. Public Hearing Opened. b, No declarations or challenges were filed. d the uest to w a C. Senior Planner Liden noteconditional use in varioussresidert 1 zones. He day care as a approval of the stated the Planning Commission recommended app proposal. Senior Planner Liden highlighted various sections of the Code that would need amendment, noting specifically the R-12, R-25, R-40 zones and also Section !8.130.050 (c)(24)(A), adding Multi-Family Residential as an applicable zone designation. d, Public Testimony O Mr. Russ Krueger, 1335 S.W. 66th A . Oregon 97225, appeared before the Council to support the request e. Community DevelopmentDirector recommended approval. the Planning Commission and City staff f. Public Hearing Closed. g O 87-03 AN ORDINANCE MUNICIPAL CODE (pA 9 ). ORDINANCE NO. 18 18.56, 18.58, and 18.130 OF THE T Johnson, seconded by h. Motion by Councilor Councilor Eadon, to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. g, PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE cAME e01'� iNT o�toamen86 d�eOtion18O62.030 Review Planning Commission's of the Community Development Code to allow a residential unit in conjunction with a permitted use Section caretakerfor a 18.106.030 (d) to establish(Commercias General) zone. Also, to amend separate parking standard for mini-warehouse uses. �x a, Public Hearing Opened. ' Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 1 • f 4 b• No declarations or challenges were filed. request of this req C. Senior Planner o ale wouldhighlighted establish ha separate e history parking standard noting the prop for mini-warehouses and would allow�ci lrbusdinessain a it C-Gfor zone� caretaker in conjunction with a co - No appeared to speak. d, Public Testimony Commission and staff e, Senior Planner r val ofnth drequestat Planning recommended app f grief discussion was held regarding the figure that for computing the parking pa computations were -warehouses.based on or Brian suggested that the Mayo definition of "caretaker" be added to the Comprehensive Plan in required for mini the future. TING g ORDINANCE —NO—. 87-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIGARDD MUNICIPALCODE SECTIONS 18.62.030 AND 18.10 (ZOA 10-86). Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to h adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10. DURHAM ROAD JURISDICTION REQUEST be a. Community Development Director stated Caen therjuri�sd�ct jurisdiction ofDurham process required for Tigard o and this was done Road. One would be to annex the right--of-way Commission. on 1/15/87 by the Portland Metropolitan Boundary Development Since that step had been completed, Community w make formal Jurisdiction Director recommended h ngton County for Durno ham Road from d99Wito transfer request to as Serena Court. , b• Dave Atkinson 10460 S.W. Century Oak Drive, requested the uest for jurisdiction transfer. Council approve the req c, RESOLUTION NO. 87-13 RESOLUTION RECORDING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY OF TIGARD TO ACARD ENOW UNDER TJURISDICTION RTIOFO WASHINGTON COUNTN OF DURHAM Y THE CITY OF TIGA OREGON. d, Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCIL RECESSED 10:01 P.M. il. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD a, Call To Order: 10:01 PM Page 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1987 n Tom an; Board b. Roll call: Present: EdBoard, CValerie Johnson, and John Schwartz; Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Chief of City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator, David Lehr, Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Loreen Wilson, City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer; . the sted b Approval of Aerial Mapping Admit atorl to enter 'into ga personal Board authorize the City to services contract with Spencer B. Gross, Inc. f r $25,000 er provide aerial mapping services for the City. Y ut should ideally be noted the maps were last pdears 1$259000 bhad been budgeted for updated every three to fourY commended approval. this project. The City Engineer re c. Motion by Board Member Eadon, seconded by Board Member Edwards, to authorize the city ABmlGrossatlnc to enter into the contract for $25,000 with Spencer Approved by unanimous vote of Board members present. RECONVENED CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 10:09 P.M. 12. CONSENT AGENDA 12.1 Approval of Council Minutes: January 12, 14, 1987 12.2 Receive & File: a. Monthly Departmental Reports 12.3 Call Public Hearing - 67th & Atlanta Right-o"-flay Vacation, Resolution No. 87-14 a. Motion by Councilor Eadon,n, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 13.1 Park Plan Report: Councilor Eadon noted that she had a copy of the plans for a 2/25/87 Town Hall Meeting with the Park Sc. krd. highlighting each At this meeting, the Park Board plans on of the parks in the City and making this open to the public. The purpose of the meeting is to not only show what Tigard has available in the way of parks but also to gain new ideas and perspective from the citizens. 13.2 Parking Restrictions - S.W. Walnut Place: Community Development Director requested the City Council approve two ordinances which would modify the existing parking regulations along S.W. Walnut inan es ord Place and dimformeapprovalnt hebasedt on t adjacentpropertyowners' recommends requests and for traffic safety reasons. ORDINANCE NO. 87-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING - �- SECTION 10.28.090 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A SUBSECTION THERETO, RELATED TO LIMITED TIME PARKING ON S.W• WALNUT PLACE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1987 Page 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 26, Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to (� adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. ORDINANCE NO. 87-06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING SECTION 10.28. 130(49) OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PROHIBITED PARKING AT ANY TIME ON S.W. WALNUT PLACE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13.3 Training Requests: City Administrator requested the Council approve the Training Request submitted from the Police Department since they were consistent with Police Department training objectives and funding was budgeted. a. Training Request: Command College — Chief of Police -- $382.00 Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to approve the Training Request. Approved by unanimous vote of Council Present. b. Training Request: Tactical Supervision of Critical Incidents -- Sgt. Martin and Lt. Wheeler — $399.00 Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve the Training Request. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. C. Training Request: Street Survival Corporal Myers, Officers Fischer, Schober and Merrill -- $440.00. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve the Training Request. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 13.4 City Recorder noted concern that with the possibility of the Municipal Court Judge leaving on vacation the City needed to appoint Pro—Tem Judges to fill the anticipated vacancy. She further explained the position of Judge was an Officer position of the City and, therefore, was coming to Council for hiring direction. Consensus of City Council was to have City Recorder receive interest applications and to review those with the Mayor. Council requested the Mayor make a recommendation for appointments at a future meeting. Page 10 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 26, 1987 RECESS REGULAR MEETING: 10:27 P.M. RECONVENE: 10:31 P.M. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:31 P.M. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e) & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 15. ADJOURNMENT: 11:20 p.m. City ecorder — City of Tigard APPROVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON THE 20th DAY OF APRIL, 1987. ATTEST: Mayor — City of Tigard Lid/cw:4604A 4 4 F S k, n s i Page_1`1 — COUNCIL MINUTES -- JANUARY 26, ,1987 u FINES pUSuSHMING COMPANY Nf� 6 9 2 4 8.0.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-03W BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ❑ Tearsheet Notice *City of Tigard *P O Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, Or 97223 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION sCOUNTY OF WASHOF INGTON, jss. 1.A n n e Jean - se and say that 1 am the Advertising being first duly sworn. depo pirecto4.or his principal clerk,of...�-�_--- a newspaper of general circulation 86 defined in ORS S 183n� and tag,pZO;published pt that Me afor�r a prMted copy of which is hereto annexed.was Published in the +entire issue of said newspaper fO successive and consecutive in the fallowing issues: Jan. 22, 1987 nd ore me Jan. 22, 1987 thi Not ublic for Oregon Myr sxpirao'w9-20-88 A"WAW 5 C e CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance Nos. 87-01 , 87-02, 87-03 and 87-04 STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I, -Lo le 5,oa 2_ being first duly sworn, on oath, depose and 3aj: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Numbers) 87-01, 87-02, 87-03 and 87-04 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated January 2b, 1987 copy(s) of said ordinan�e(s) bei hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the z1day of i 1987. I. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon Sub.scrribk #nd sworn to before me this 1 y day of 1:0-fil 190 Notary Public for Oregon C 11 `�,i My Commission Expires: //--6(o-99 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87—_!2 I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP (CPA 11-86). WHEREAS, the Transportation Map designates the function for streets within the Tigard planning area; and WHEREAS, this map presently designates SW 108th Avenue as a local street and SW Riverwood Lane as a minor collector street; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on December 2, 1986, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a proposal to designate SW 108th Avenue as a minor collector street and SW Riverwood Lane as a local street; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation at a public hearing on January 26, 1987. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: SW 108th Avenue shall be designated on the Transportation Map as a minor collector north of the proposed SW Kent Drive intersection as shown in Exhibit "A". Section 2: SW Riverwood Lane shall be designated as a local street and No. 9 of the Transportation Map Legend shall be amended to state "Indirect local street connections between 92nd Avenue and 108th Avenue" as shown on Exhibit "A" and "B". PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 7k day of T jo. 1987. Xoreen R.2Wilso�ACity Recorder APPROVED: This La. day of _ , 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor { KSL:bs0457W } x� ORDINANCE NO. 87— s Page 1 1 1 . 1 " �1 Ani i ,ice ��;a �' ■ MONH i ,1 .1 ff= `'ori��r��.�. ,� ,■ 1,��■� � �� ' �� ail � r f�•�j ' fib � � `- ��®�`� � Al L��i1R ;�,•+ - s uj L r a s �XHr�3rT ,,,g.. W W JLLJ & wF Z V > < S Q . X 4Ci W� Q Y > Z C9 m L f �► co C C Z .Q Rj T Z ¢ © ---- - e' a0 'a Oz o `r �_ ,tt) S �-- r n V) m t �,. • .r J Q J W � _ •� G Z t- a.N Z .z ► f a W VJ I I CL r� t7 w to cZ W 3 y=x to J_ Q ¢ _ J Y s W E-• W z U -1 L Q Q r � r 4' W ut Q W J U z > V :_ �:. .�.. Q 2 W hy Q :C •' J w W Z S W 3 ui rr �y J j N `-Rp - F" Z - 3.10 r --ow�El� ..J cr Z " � u C 2�; r V J - s = L) -C c Q _ Z �+ X Q C�✓ �,_- 1I ; 3 0 W V Na� D , \ w � W � uj MWa � � � �� X E_ Jto. r �j LULJJ ED C) aZ z 'z zz - J� V Lu tj w LJ In VO UO ►- UT = . A C 2 uj J Z t o 2 2 Z a 2 2`� Z _j ZW 7 -J Z ZQ Z Z 2f� j cv v cA r co a) O ►- - z w Z a U- 0 J Cf) LLJ 6. Zo Cb 0 O OD co z rc) -' o p z W ❑ N � c _ Z - (10 a z O w C) Z rn — J ON p N � p Q X LL� Z O H O Z Z CL M Q = QQ O a00 N h- 0 co LLJ CL cr Q 0 W O 71 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87— C);Z AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP (CPA 12-86). WHEREAS, the Transportation Map designates the function for streets within the Tigard planning area; and WHEREAS, this map presently designates SW 135th Avenue as a major collector street; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on January 6, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a proposal to designate SW 135th Avenue as a minor collector street; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation at a public hearing on January 26, 1987. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SW 135th Avenue shall be designated on the Transportation Map as a minor collector north of the proposed SW Murray Blvd, intersection as shown in Exhibit "A." PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this -2&-rA day of 1987. C i oreen R.7Wilson,- City Recorder �r APPROVED: This .�scZ,= day of 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor KL:cn/0455W r-d ORDINANCE NO. 87— o Page L • WSW IM all • a t ♦ •�Ot�1 �+o+ .■R,■.■Lrl11 ■rlluis b w BF 0- NOOK- Jos: -►�•♦.. = M�,��C .a HAS �' A� ��� is i.rt iw =�• It1► f� � � L Not WIN 1 j • 1i � ... ,f n • \ • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87- 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18.54, 18.56, 18.58, AND 18.130 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (ZOA 9-86). r WHEREAS, the Community Development Code regulates the construction and operation of childrens day care facilities; and WHEREAS, the current ordinance allows childrens day care as a conditional use in all the single family residential zones (R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5, R-7) but not in the multi--family zones (R-12, R-25, R-40); and WHEREAS, this amendment will allow childrens day care in the R-12, R-25, and R-40 zones as a conditional use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed staff's recommendation at a public hearing on January 6, 1987 and voted to recommend approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposal at a public hearing on January 26, 1987. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Sections 18.54.040 and 18.56.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended by adding the following subsection: (9) Childrens Day Care Section 2: Section 18.58.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended by adding the following subsection: (8) Childrens Day Care Section 3: Section 18.130.150 (c)(24)(A) of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended as shown below with the language to be added underlined. (A) Applicable Zone: Single family and multi-family residential, CBD. PASSED: By [J hex n;m,r«S vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 2/.,-rh day of 1987. L-dire�en R. Wilson, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of T� . .�.►� 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor KSL-bs0459W ORDINANCE NO. 87- _ Page 1 k CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87-Q±L_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING SECTIONS 18.62.030 AND 18.106.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (ZOA 10-86). WHEREAS, Section 18.62.030 identifies the permitted uses in the C-G (Commercial General) zone and Section 18.106.030 identifies the parking requirements for wholesale, storage, and distribution; and WHEREAS, Section 18.62.030 does not allow a caretaker residence in conjunction with a commercial use in the C-G zone and Section 18. 106.030 does not contain parking standards for mini-warehouses; and WHEREAS, this amendment would allow for a caretaker residence and establish a parking standard for mini-warehouses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the staff recommendation at a public hearing on January 6, 1987 and voted to recommend approval of the amendment to City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 26, 1987 to consider the amendment. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 18.62.030 shall be amended by adding a new subsection that states : (4) A single-family unit provided that it is located on the same site with a permitted use in Section 18.62.030 or .040 and is occupied exclusively by a caretaker or superintendent of the permitted use and family. Section 2: Section 18.106.030(d) shall be amended by adding a new subsection that states: (3) Mini-warehouse 1 space for every 200 square feet of gross office floor area, plus 2 spaces for a caretaker residence. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this �% day of Z_ 19 7. `QQ oreen R. Wilson, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of �� _, 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor XSL:bs0454W ORDIWAN E FOO. 87=- o4 Page 1 VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE 1/26/87 (Limited to 2 m nines or less, please) i Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues no on the agenda. but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED 0 _a--m=r ate'"' •.,•; ;:c<. DATE 1/26/87 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on •- the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: . Age0da Item No• k.:�Pubtic Hearing COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-86; Modify S.W. Riverwood Lane to a local street from a minor collector Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Vane, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation Ase 0140 t i?�.oi qui yi�.t fb)voc ..fit o �-- c. � DATE 1/26/87 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) t 4 Item Description: PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHNSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-86; Review Planning Commission's recommendation for designating Avenue as a minor co ec or s ree por ion only). Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation DATE 1/26/87 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: IGAti `=3]U-= PUBLIC HEARING ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 9-86 RUSS_KRUEGER; allowing Children's Daycare as Conditional Use in R-12 R-25 an R-40+ zoning districts. Proponent (For Issue) opponent (Against Issue) Name, AddressandAffiliation Name, Address and Affiliation 1 .63 C S vo to LON DDdMn A t DATE 1/26/87 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: tXo • F=PUBLIC HEARING ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 10-86 Proponent (For Issue) opponent (Against Issue) Nasse, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation y k? 4 1 C-1 -- MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder January 15, 1987 FROM: Billie Rawlings; Community Development SUBJECT: Transportation Advisory Committee Attendance Below is a list of Transportation Advisory Committee dates and attendance since the beginning. January 17, 1985 - No minutes. January 31, 1985 - No minutes. February 14, 1985 - Balodis, Fyre, Kempter, Padgett, Schweitz, Sullivan. March 28, 1985 - Balodis, Bishop, Fyre, Hamlin, Kempter, Padgett, Schweitz, Sullivan. April 18, 1985 - Bishop, Fyre, Schweitz, Sullivan, Balodis. May 16, 1985 - Balodis, Fyre, Hamlin, Kempter, Padgett, Sullivan. July 11, 1985 - Sullivan, Padgett, Balodis, Fyre, Bishop. August 1, 1985 - Sullivan, Padgett, Kempter, Bishop, Fyre, Schweitz. September S. 1985 - Sullivan, Padgett, Kempter, Bishop, Balodis, Fyre, Hummel. October 3, 1985 - Sullivan, Padgett, Balodis, Fyre, Schweitz, Bishop, November 7, 1985 - No minutes. December 5, 1985 - No minutes. January 9, 1986 - Sullivan, Padgett, Balodis, Bishop, Schweitz, Fyre. March 6, 1986 -- Sullivan, Padgett, Schweitz, Bishop. April 3, 1986 - Sullivan, Padgett, Schweitz, Hummel. May 1, 1986 - Cancelled. June 5, 1986 - Sullivan, Padgett, Schweitz. July 10, 1986 - No minutes. August 7, 1986 -- Cancelled. September 4, 1986 - No minutes. - i►'s� �J,it.r:u�r,� October 2, 1986 - No minutes. November 6, 1986 - No minutes. December, 1986 - Cancelled. January 8, 1987 - No minutes. ✓ 2996P - - � a : \ \ \ \ $ ( } I � . ■ • ; : § ) . } � ■ � � ƒ All : \ \ • \ \ \ : ; : $ � $ ■ _ $ § • J �_ �� , a Ie a S J .t ;NQ . ~ � � � �� , � � �� ��. �� �� a ~■ # � � � � . ®���\ . �� ■ � § � �� � . r s _� ■ ■ � r � � . 2. . . . \ re. e e ■ e e 00 ■ Do . e ' e e . . CITY OF TIGARD, _OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA TTEM SUMMARY OF: January 26 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 15 1987 AGENDA AGENDAAGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission ISSUE/ZOA ?-86 Home Occupations recommendation on 12/2/86• public. - he PAR �B 12/15/86 PREPARED BY: Deborah A. Stuart DEPT HEAD OK TY ADMIN O REQUESTED BY: _ POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Planning Commission met three times prior to its final meeting on December 2, 1986 and recommended approval of ZOA 7-86, which revises the Nome occupation Chapter of the Community Development Code (18.142). The revisions encompass three broad areas: 1) expansion of the purpose statement in Section 18.142.010; 2) creation of two new categories of home occupations - Type I and Type II - which differentiate between intensities of use associated with home occupations; and 3) new permitting and public hearings procedures for Type II. home occupation permits. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve ZOA 7-86 as recommended by the Planning Commission and amended as per City Council directive. 2. Approve ZOA 7-86 with modifications. 3. Deny ZOA 7-86. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Approve ZOA 7-86 as recommended by the Planning Commission and amended as per City Council directive. DAS:b92732P MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council January 26, 1987 FROM: Deborah A. Stuart, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Home Occupation Ordinance Revisions (ZOA 7-86) The following shall highlight the evolution of the most recent revisions to Chapter 18.142 of the Community Development Code (Home Occupations) . The Tigard Planning Commission met three times to discuss revisions to Chapter 18.142. At their last meeting on December 2, 1986, a close vote resulted in a recommendation for approval. The revisions encompass three broad areas: 1) expansion of the purpose statement in Section 18.142.010; 2) creation of two new categories of home occupations - Type I and Type II - which differentiate between intensities of use or neighborhood impact associated with home occupations; and 3) new permitting and public hearings procedures for Type II home occupation permits. As the meetings progressed, it became apparent that the resolution of several issues was paramount to a successful vote on the draft ordinance. The following shall illuminate those issues, along with the results of a Planning Commission opinion poll taken recently to clarify their respective positions. Poll participation involved six commissioners. ISSUE l: Should the Citv continue the policy of non-regulation of babysitters or, require registration or,, review then as a Type IT home occupation? Child care is a booming business. Baby-boomers of the 1950's and '60's are now parents knd are having their own babies. As a result, the number of children under age 5 nationwide is growing rapidly and is comparable to figures for 1968 - the last part of the Post--filar baby boom. Dug to many changes in the American nuclear family structure, including more single family 1: tads of households, and divorced, unwed and/or working mothers, today's parents are seeking child day care in record numbers. Because child car* is expensive to afford, parents shop for cheaper services offured by child care providers who hold down expenses by cutting corners. As a result, larger organized day care programs must be regulated by the State. Some states require home-based child care operators to be registered with a local agency as well. a.. HOME pJpATION ZOA 7-86 Page 1 � Yet about 90 percent of childcare providers are not registered or licensed by anybody. Since most are never registered by zoning departments few of these child care operators are known to zoning or public child welfare authorities. They often only become known when problems arise when parents ur neighbors complain to the local jurisdiction or other public agency. Some will argue that as with most home routines carried on excessively, babysitting becomes a business if children and infants are continually brought to a residence to be cared for. In this case, babysitting is treated as a home occupation whether or not for compensation (excerpted from The Zoning Report, Vol. 4, No. 6, June 20, 1986) . Currently our Code considers only one kind of child care: Children's day care. The revisions add a definition for babysitters. The matrix below summarizes the differences between the two uses and proposed and current regulations. STATE REGULATED BY LICENSE? NO. CHILDREN TIME PERIOD CITY Babysitters NO 5 full—time 8+ hrs.over None currently 24 hr period plus 4 part-• 3 hours in time row over 24 hr. period 9 Total At any one Proposed: time 1. None 2. Registration 3. Type II 140P Children's Day YES 6 or more 12 hours No change: Care or less Conditional Use Permit The Planning Commission was evenly split on this issue. Some members believed that babysitters could simply be registered with the City, indicating name, location and anticipated number of children on a form — without a business tax requirement — so that should complaints result the City would be able to ascertain whether the babysitting use had progressed to a children's day care use. All Planning Commission members believed that should a child care operation be determined to be a children's day care use as defined in our Code, then the children's day care use be permitted only with a Conditional Use permit. ISSUE 2: Nome Parties• if regulated what standards should be used? The new ordinance exempts those home parties which occur not more than twice per year and at one location (even though the purpose of the party is for profit) from home occupation permit requirements. The Planning Commission voted 4-2 in favor of regulating home parties and no changes were suggested for the standards. HOME OCCUPATION ZOA 7-86 Page 2 ISSUE 3: Is the use of an accessory building for Type II home occupations acceptable? F The new ordinance will allow the use of an existing, detached accessory building in conjunction with a home occupation, provided: 1) the combined gross floor area used for the home occupation does not exceed 25% of the total for both the residence and the accessory building and that the total area in the accessory building not exceed 500 square feet; and 2) that the building comply with all other accessory use regulations contained in Chapter 18. 144 of the Code. The Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of allowing the use of such an accessory building in conjunction with a Type II home occupation. The Type II application will automatically require a public hearing and the hearings officer (or approval authority on renewals) has the discretion to impose other limitations. The Planning Commission also voted unanimously to include non-heated, non-ventilated spaces (such as found in attached garages) in the calculation of gross floor area. ISSUE 4: Should paid, non-resident employees be allowed with a Type II home occupation permit? The Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of allowing no mare than one paid, non-resident employee to work in conjunction with the business. Family members permanently residing in the home and occasional non-paid volunteers will also be allowed. ISSUE 5: Should the use of an additional vehicle such as a van or light Pick-up truck be allowed in addition to those vehicles normally associated with the residence for a Type II home occupation? The Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor as long as the additional vehicle was small (less than 14,000 lbs. gross cargo weight). ISSUE 6: Should any signage be allowed for home occupations in resi-+•_ntial areas? For home occupations in commercial and industrial zones? The Planning Commission voted unanimously to prohibit any permanent signage ' advertising a home occupation business in a residential zone. This vote maintains the old prohibition against such signage. (Other types of signs such as real estate and garage sale signs remain unaffected and are covered in the Sign Code.) The Planning Commission voted in favor of allowing those home occupations located in commercial and industrial zones to use a small sign. No standards were suggested; staff requests direction from Council regarding sign standards for such home occupations to be inserted in Chapter 18.114 (Sign Code). ISSUE 7: Should visitors, customers, clients. and deliveries be- allowed- to Visit a Tvefe II home occupation and if so at what frequency? The Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of staff's draft recommendation which reads: ". . . shall not exceed that normally and reasonably occurring for a residence including not more than two business visitors an hour or up to a maximum of eight per day and not more than two y, deliveries of products and/or materials a week." HOME OCCUPATION ZOA 7-86 Page 3 ISSUE 8: Whether to require notification of home occupation renewals to surrounding property owners within 250 of the subject property. Because of the amount of staff time and expense involved in making a list of . those property owners and then preparing a mailing, staff recommends dropping the notice requirements for home occupation renewals - unless a violation (alleged or real) has occurred and has been reported to the Planning Division. Surrounding property owners often call to ask why they received the renewal notices at all. Pertinent wording has been added to Section 18.142.040. HOP Ordinance Revisions (ZOA 7-86) Page 4 January 26, 1987 OTHER ADDITIONS OR CHANGES EVIDENT IN THIS SUBMITTAL: 18.142.055(c)(2)(i) - establishes a maximum allowable area of 500 square feet in an accessory building and notes variance procedures. a 18.142.055(c)(9) - allows use of one non-residence related light vehicle in conjunction with a Type II home occupation. Inadvertent omission. 18.142.055(d)(14) -- allows the hearings officer or approval authority (on _ renewals) to limit the number of visitors, customers and/or deliveries. 18.142.040(c) - eliminates the notice requirement to surrounding property owners for home occupation permit renewal except when a violation has been reported to the Planning Division. If a violation has been reported, then an investigation will occur with possible code enforcement and revocation of the permit or if violation report appears to be untenable, then the usual notice and appeal procedures will be carried out. (DAS:cn/2889P) NOME OOCUPATION 20A 7-86 Page 4 P,� January 25, 1987 Tigard City Council Tigard Civic Center 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard , Oregon 97223 To Members of the City Council : We are unable to attend the January 26, 1987 meeting in person but still wish to voice an opinion regarding regulations of home businesses. We feel that the size and nature of any home business should be severly restricted so as to preserve the purpose of an area already designated "residential". Specifically, when any business involves production noise. high traffic levels, employees, signs and second buildings, it then should be considered "commercial" not "residential" and located as such. Sin rely, Daniel and Kathy Strauss 9565 S.W. Frewing Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 y_ 3 } 2 w t r /� � / / f ....� / / � , � ./ �� l l /,.l i i � �'" ` /�`� � �" � � %� ,. � , i ', � � � ,. � ' � - is/� i r � � / �f / � � � / /i . �� _���� ,;+1D" no I PATTI'S COLONIAL BEAUTY A GIFT SALON -'— 10060 S. W. Katherine Tigard, Oregon 97223 639-5408 I have been established as a home beauty salon at 10060 S. W. Katherine, Tigard, Oregon 97223 since 1968 . I have met all state, county and city regulations for my entire time at this location. Permission was granted by the City of Tigard by issuing a license and receiving my money. This business has been my sole source of income as I stated to your person in charge. Curtailing this business would not only invoke a financial hardship for me but also inconvenience my customers of long standing. I have also contacted my neighbors and they have no complaints or or objections to my continuing the operation of my business as I have been doing. My neighbors and customers have evidenced their support by sigi,: g the enclosed petition. Trusting a decision will be rendered in my favor, I remain, Respectfully, Patti Fleming Enc. s ' n nom✓ 10 700 sAv ,ter i�� a yd b opo OZ. S $OD ,Lj"X^.a�•5='�R LV.I�I 'C¢' `�•.Z -' ©`1'Gv 9,2,V,5 d�:ttity cv f,G-�r�J„y,,��,,�c.�,,,J /�a3'aa-•�'�, �; 4�.z�1! `..�9-�az5t l b 15 Sb S< W . /��i .. oZ�•��1 G'3o",r.3.S�_ ry; i of 3s sus kjU - to , 3 - ou - C" Cao- -Fo`t I p 13 p S LJ c cjA O�j7! 7-7 � �' /a3�s� ,� w• ;At. 639-7'3JJ' 25-21`0 Y�~ '^� / ����f f-�i ! �r�..o� �. •! !'�Li..a�'-tL'"L,1"'t.�-:......� t LJ� � ~ �...%cT G� r 2-�''Z'' �7 ` `�'�"�tr�rr •��. 'j�"'T%�r �' 7y�,,i � 6 VV rA t�fv, c.t`fid 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 87— AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 18.142 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE - HOME OCCUPATIONS. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, the planning staff made recommendation of findings to the City of Tigard Planning Commission at three public hearings on October 7, October 21st, and November 18, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of ZOA 7-86 at its regular meeting on December 2, 1986; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changes on December la, 1986 and January 26, 1987. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Community Development Code shall be amended as shown in Exhibit "A". Language to be added is UNDERLINED. Language to be deleted is shag in [BRACKETS]. Section 2: That this Ordinance shall be effective on o al after er he 31st day after its passage by the Council and app PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 1987. Loreen R. Wilson, City Recorder APPROVED: This _ day of 1987. Thomas M. Brian, Mayor OM:bs2732P Owl"AMCE to. Pose 1 EXHIBIT "A" 18.142 HOME OCCUPATIONS — Draft Purpose It is the purpose of this Chapter to regulate home occupations in residential commercial and industrial zones in a manner that will ensure that the use is: (1) A secondary, lawful use to the primary residential use of the premises upon which they are found, and (2) Not disruptive on the residential area. The purpose of this Chapter is also to• 1) permit residents of the community a choice in the use of their homes as a place of livelihood and the production or supplementing of personal income and family income• and 2) establish criteria and development standards for home occupations conducted in dwelling units and accessory structures in residential, commercial, and industrial x zones. The standards contained in this Chapter are intended to assure that home occupations will be compatible and consistent with the residential uses and will not have a detrimental effect on the neighboring properties, and the neighboring residents. The standards contained in this Chapter are intended to promote the efficient use of public services and facilities by assuring these services are provided to the residential population for which they were planned and constructed, { (� rather than for commercial or industrial uses. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 1 No person shall carry on a home occupation or permit such use to occur on property which that person owns or is in lawful control of, contrary to the erovisions of this ordinance and without first obtaining or insuring that there has been obtained a permit for such use in the manner provided by this Chapter where a permit is required. It is not the intent of this Chapter to regulate hobbies. A home occupation is to be Seared ultimately towards financial gain_ 18.142.020 Exemptions (a) Garage sales [are exempt from the provisions of this Chapter.] (b) Sale of produce or other food products grown on the premises. (c) Not—for—profit hobbies. (d) Home parties occurring not more than twice per Year and at one location even though the purpose of the party is for profit. (e) Sabysitters as defined in Section 18.42.020(x)(11) of the Code. 18 142 030 Administration and Approval Process (a) The applicant of a home occupation proposal shall be the occupant of the property. (b) For a single home occupation carried on at two or more Tigard residences one Joint business tax application shall be required but each business partner must apply for a separate home occupation permit. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 2 RIT .:: (c) A Pre-Application Conference with City staff is required in accordance with Section 18.32.040. (d) Due to possible changes in State statutes, or regional or local policy, information given by staff to the applicant during the Pre-Application Conference is valid for not more than 6 months. (1) Another Pre--Application Conference is required if any application is submitted 6 months after the Pre-Application. (2) Failure of the Director to provide any of the information required by this Chapter shall not constitute a waiver of the standards, criteria or requirements of the application. (e) The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny any application for a Type I home occupation. The Director shall apply the standards set forth in Seciion 18.142.050 of this Chapter when reviewing an application for a Type I home occupation. E (f) The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny any application for a Type II home occupation. The Hearings Officer shall apply the standards set forth in Section 19.142.055 of thisChapter when reviewing an application for a Type II home occupation. (g) Notice of the [Director's decision] approval authority's decision shall be given as provided by 18.32.120. The decision of the approval authority may be appealed in accordance with Sections 18.32.310(a) and (b). HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 - PAGE 3 (h) Violation of the provisions of this Chapter constitutes a Class I Civil Infraction and shall be enforced as provided in Section 5-.04.180 of the Tiqard Municipal Code 18.142.035 Permit Renewal — Applicability 'sa (a) Home occupation permits issued under the provisions of this Code shall expire after one year and an application for renewal of the permit shall be filed with the City to continue lawful operation of the home occupation business. The permit renewal application shall be approved or denied in accordance with the provisions sat forth in Section 18.142.040 of this Code. (b) Home occupation permits which received approval prior to November 1983 but may be nonconforming as defined in Section 18.132.090(d)(1) shall be renewed annually. The permit renewal application shall be approved or denied in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 18.142.040 of this Code. (c) Home occupation businesses which existed without a valid Home Occupation permit prior to November 1983 shall apply for a Home Occupation permit under the provisions of Chapter 18.142. The original permit shall be valid for one year and shall be renewed annually prior to the expiration date under the provisions of Section 18.142.040. R HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 4 3- 18.142.040 Expiration of Approval - Extension of Time Revocation (a) Approval of a home occupation by the [Director] approval authority shall be effective for a one-year period. (b) The Director shall renew the permit upon: (1) Application and payment of a fee by the applicant; r (2) Finding that: (A) All of the conditions of approval have been satisfied; (8) There has been no change in the original application approved by the [Director) appropriate approval authority; (C) There have been no changes in the facts or applicable policies on which the approval was based; (D) The applicable approval criteria in 18.142.050 or 18.142.055 are satisfied. (E) The applicant certifies that he/she is complying with the conditions of approval and agrees to-comply in the future. (c) The Director shall give notice of the renewal as provided by 19.32.120 only in the case where a real or alleged violation has been reported to the Planning Division_. The decision may be appealed as provided by 18.32.310(b). HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 PAGE 5 (d) The Director may revoke a home occupation approval if the . conditions are not satisfied as provided by the original home occupation permit or the most recent renewal. [Section 18.32.250(f).] (e) A Home Occupation Permit shall become invalid:_ (1) should the property on which the original Home Occupation Permit was based be sold or legally transferred to a family member who is not a resident of the home, or (2) if the applicant moves his residence. 18.142.050 Approval Criteria for Type I Home Occupations A Type I Home Occupation Permit shall not require a public hearing and shall be an administrative decision made by the Planninq Director. No notification of a Type I Home Occupation Permit will be mailed to surrounding_ property owners of record. Issuance of a Tape I Home Occupation Permit shall be allowed only for those hoses occupations which can successfully meet all of the following approval criteria without exception and which do not possess any characteristics_ of uses and activities--described-in Section 18.142.055 below. (a) The use shall be a lawful use which shall be carried on by the occupants of the dwellings; HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 6 (b) The Home Occupation shall be operated: (1) Entirely within the dwelling unit and the use and any storage of materials and products shall not occupy more than 25% of the gross floor area. (2) More than one home occupation shall be allowed on any one property only if the combined floor space usage of both home occupations do not exceed 25% of the gross floor area the dwelling. (c) The use shall be a secondary use to the primary use of the house as a dwelling; (d) There shall be no exterior indication of the home occupation; no exterior signs shall be used; no other on--site advertising visible from the exterior shall be used which informs the public of the use except Eof] the address of the home occupation may be displayed; (e) There shall be no outdoor storage or display, of materials, vehicles or products on the premises. Indoor storage of materials or products shall not exceed the limitations imposed by the provisions of the Building, Fire, Health and Housing Codes. The applicant shall be required to obtain approval from the relevant Fire District prior to storage of any flammable or hazardous materials on the property. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 - PAGE 7 (f) The use shall not include any retail sales other than telephone sales. (g) The use shall not involve direct sales or service from the property necessitating customer traffic to the residence. (h) The home occupation shall not produce any noise or obnoxious odors, vibrations, glare, fumes, [or] electrical interference, heat, (detectable to normal sensory perception outside the structure), traffic, and discharge of materials gases or fluids into the sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems which are either in excess of what is normally associated with residential uses or which exceed the performance standards set forth in Section 18.90 of this Code. (i) There shall be no other paid employees on the premises other than those who are permanent residents of the dwelling; (j) The use shall not require any additional parking other than that which is required for the residence. 18.142.055 Approval Criteria for a Tvpe II Home Occupation Permit Lal A Type II Home Occupation shall be defined as a home occupation which is of a more intensified nature or use than a Type I home occupation. Type II home occupations may involve the use of one or more of the following characteristics: HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 8 Detached, Existing Accessory Buildings Visitors customers clients and/or deliveries (3) A non-resident paid employee or associate (4) Any other restrictions or regulations which the approval authority deems necessary (18.142.055(d)(12)). .b. A Type II Home occupation Permit shall require a public hearing held by the Hearings Officer. An appeal of the Hearing's Officer decision may be made as provided in Section 18.32.310(a). Lcl The Hearings Officer shall approve approve with conditions or deny an application for a Type II home occupation permit based on findis of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: Lil The use shall be a lawful use which shall be carried on by the occupants of the dwelling; The Home Occupation may be operated within: ( The dwelling unit and a conforming, existing accessory structure The use and storage of materials and products shall not occupy more than 25% of the combined gross floor area and the total area used in the accessory building shall not exceed 500 square feet. Any accessory building that is used must meet Uniform Building Code requirements and be in conformance with 18.144 of the Code. Variances to the accessory use requirements may be applied for as per Section 18.134 of the Code. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 - PAGE 9 i ii More than one home occupation shall be allowed on any one property only if the combined floor space usage of both home occupations does not exceed 25% of the gross floor area of all allowable residential and accessory use structures on the property. The use shall be a secondary use to the primary use of the property as a dwelling; There shall be no exterior indication of the home occupation; no exterior signs shall be used; no other on—site advertising visible from the exterior shall be used which informs the public of the use except the address of the home occupation may be displayed. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials or products on the premises. Indoor storage of materials or products shall not exceed the limitations imposed by the provisions of the Building, Fire, Health and Housing Codes. The applicant shall be required to obtain approval from the relevant Fire District prior to storage of any flammable or hazardous materials on the property. Visitors, customers, clients or deliveries shall not exceed that normally and reasonably occurring for a residence including not more than two business visitors an hour or up to a maximum of - eight per day and not more than two deliveries of products and/or materials a week. R "` HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 10 The home occupation shall not produce any noise or obnoxious odors vibrations glare, fumes electrical interference, heat, and discharge of materials gases or fluids into the sanitary sewer or storm drainage systems which are either in excess of what is normally associated with residential uses or which exceed the performance standards set forth in Section 19.90 of this Code. The home occupation may involve one, but no more than one, non-resident paid associate or employee working on the premises some or all of the time. The use may involve one additional van or light pick-up truck less than 14,000. lbs. ross cargo weight which -My be used solely for the business or for residential and business purposes. Additional Requirements for a Tvpe II Home Occupation. The Hearings Officer may impose conditions on the approval of a Type II Home Occupation Permit which it finds are necessary to assure the use is compatible with other uses in the vicinity. These conditions may include. but are not limited to the following: Limiting the hours, days, place and manner of operation. Requiring design features which minimize environmental impacts such as noise vibration air pollution, glare, odor and dust. Requiring additional setback areas, lot area or lot depth or width. L4Z Limiting the areal extent of the home occupation use and location on the site. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-66 - PAGE 11 Designating the size number, location and design of vehicle access points. Requiring street right-of-way to be free of vehicles at all times. Requiring landscaping, screening drainage and surfacing of parking and loading areas. Limiting the extent and type of interior or exterior building remodeling. Limiting or setting standards for the location and intensity of outdoor lighting. 10 Requiring berming, screening or landscaping and the establishment of standards for their installation and maintenance. 11 Requiring and designating the size, height location and materials for fences. 12 Requiring the protection and preservation of existing _trees, soils, vegetation watercourse habitat areas and drainage areas. J131 Limiting the type and number of vehicles or equipment to be parked or stored on the site. 14 Limiting the number of visitors, customers and/or deliveries to be allowed togo to the site. JL51 Any other limitations which the Hearings Officer or approval authority considers to be necessary or desirable to make the use comply with the purposes stated in 18.142.050 or 18.142.055. 18.142.060 Approval and Compliance for a Business [Licensel Tax Certificate No business [license] tax certificate will be issued for a home occupation until the home occupation application is approved and the applicant certifies that the home occupation will be operated in strict compliance with the provisions of the Chapter and the conditions of approval. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 -PAGE 12 18.142.070 Time Limit and Revocation C (a) The [Director] aooroval authority may approve a home occupation application subject to a specific time period at the termination of which there shall be a renewal application to determine if all of the conditions and provisions of this Chapter have been satisfied. The permit shall be renewed if all of the conditions have been satisfied. (b) The Director may revoke a home occupation approval if the conditions are not satisfied as provided by the original home occupation permit or the most recent renewal permit. [Section 18.32.250.3 JcJ Failure to pay the annual renewal fee shall result _in the assessment of additional five dollars ($5.00) processing fee if paid within thirty (30) days after the due date; or revocation of the home occupation permit if not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date. 19.142.000 Application Submission Requirements - Y (a) An application shall be made on forms provided by the Director and shall be accompanied by: (1) One copy [Three copies] of the applicant's statement or narrative which explains how the proposal conforms to the standards in 18.142.050 or 18.142.055. HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 13 (2) A list of names and addresses of all persons who are property owners of record within 250 [100] feet of the site. (3) The required fee. (� One plot plan of the pr_pert . One floor plan of all structures on the property. One title transfer instrument. One assessor's map. The application form. Property owner's signature(s)_ or written authorization. OTHER RELATED REVISIONS 18.26.030 Home Occupations. A home occupation exists when a dwelling unit in a residential, commercial or industrial zone is used for a for—profit business purpose. See Chapter 18.142. 18.42.020(a)(8) Children's Day Cara. Refers to services or facilities authorized, certified or licensed by the State for children's day care of six (6) or more children at any one time for a period not to exceed twelve (12) hours per day with or without compensation See 18.42.020(x)(11). 18.42.020(a)(11) Babysitting Service Refers to day care services_ for children if the compensation therefore is paid directly by the parent or legal guardian or if the service is provided without any compensation in either the home of the parent or guardian or the home of the babysitter. A babysitting_ HOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 — PAGE 14 service provides for care for not more than five children for eight or more hours in a 24-hour period and the service may be provided for not more than four other ("Part-time") children for not more than three consecutive hours in a 24 hour period No more than a total of nine children including the babysitter's children can be present at any one time. Variation_ from the above constitutes a day care facility. See 18.42.020(a)(8). 2693P/0043P f 3 NOME OCCUPATIONS ZOA 7-86 - PAGE 15 S CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PRESCRIBING NEW PLANNING FEES AND CHARGES, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-52 AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, The City of Tigard has adopted planning ordinances pursuant to Chapters 227 and 92 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; and WHEREAS, the adopted planning ordinances require that for the purpose of defraying the expenses arising from or incident to investigation, evaluation and processing applications fees and charges be prescribed; and WHEREAS, Section 3.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code grants the City Council the authority to set rates for fees and charges by resolution; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council on September 24, 1984 -.oved to set rates for fees at 80% of average cost; and WHEREAS, the effective date for new fees and charges rates was June 1, 1986, and; WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council voted to approve Zone Ordinance Amendment 7-86 after a public hearing on December 15, 1986 an a continuance to January 26, 1987, thereby amending Chapter 18.142 of the Community Development Code (Home Occupations); and WHEREAS, the amended Chapter 18.142 provides for new application and public hearings procedures and creates Type I and Type II Home Occupations; and WHEREAS, the effective date for new fees and charge rates is to be March 1, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: Resolution No. 86-52 be repealed n their beleviedaccording and that fees and charges for planning applications to the following new scheduled attached as Exhibit "A." Section 2: This resolution shall be effective on and after the let day of March, 1987. PASSED: This day of 1987. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder City of Tigard DAS:cn/2737P RESOLUTION NO. 87- s Page 1 '` EXHIBIT A JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE 100% of highest planning fee plus 10% of all additional planning fees on proposal COMPREHENSIVE PLANT PROCESSING Text Only $650.00 Map Only $650.00 Both Text and Map $650.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Less than ten acres $500.00 Ten or more acres $600.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than ten acres $500.00 Ten or more acres $600.00 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT $300.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review $700.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional use review $350.00 TEMPORARY USE PROCESSING 1 to 3 months by Director $75./mo. 3 months to 1 year by Planning Commission/City Council $150.00 Special exemption/Non-profit $ -0- VARIANCE - ADMINISTRATIVE $200.00 SENSITIVE LANDS - FLOODPLAIN $500.00 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 $ 75.00 $10,000 - $99,999 $150.00 $1OO,000 - $499,000 $300.00 $500,000 - $999,000 $400.00 $1,000,000 or more $500.00 + $1 per $10,000 over $1 million not to exceed $2000 LAND PARTITION - RESIDENTIAL $225.00 LAND PARTITION - NON-RESIDENTIAL $225.00 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLANT $400.00 + $5/lot Subdivision variance if needed $100.00 APPEAL OF DIRECTORS DECISION if TO PLANNING COMMISSION $225.00 h RESOLUTION NO. 87- �r Page 2 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION OR HEARINGS OFFICES DECISION TO $300.00 + Transcript Costs CITY COUNCIL VACATIONS/STREETS AND PUBLIC ACCESS Actual costs FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS — $100,00 DEVELOPED LOTS HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT $75.00 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT $ —0— ACCESSORY USES/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES $75.00 INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT $50.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $200.00 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $50.00 Typ® I $90.00 Type II $20.00 R@newal Slay CODE EXCEPTION $220.00 Yk (DAS:cn/2737P) '^f at RESOLUTION NO. 87- Paga 3 j m L. l t I{ y. M `1 y r}� 8 a � g � a a � a O b t�Nppn". Id rl t H 04 W n a � J JANUARY —26, 19£7. WE, THE FROF`ERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF IOETt-1 AVENUE REQUEST T`7HE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL BE CONSIDERED AT TH I_- MEET I NC: 1 . THAT' 100TH AVENUE BE DES I PNATEL AS A !-OCAL STREET CONTINUOUSLY r=ROIJ DURHAM ROAD ALL THE WAY TO TNF TUAt.AT I N FIVER FOR THC FOLLOWING REASONS: A. IT IS RELATIVELY LOW' F-F UL'1T I ON s"+h1D L-sT^L{1_I SHED FOF. FAMILY D4lE !..I__IN3. F. —HE HA7ARD ;F- FNTRAe ICE �-;NTO rUR'iAC^ R'CA ' ```iOM 1(-)r _F" P- ENL_'' - DUE TD F'nOP �:I :-I F?t-I TY ON THE I-FFT !tA3FST 3 . �. TRAFFIC k;Ote._D PE- FACTTE R SERVED L=' AFt'I-1;JXI,.. ,' 1 1 r.eTP-;rbc r� `rTSF TF r D!E C r'F=1I'OEE"' ME.-.,�F�Y .r,—•�.:'1 AF'ARTME:NT�-, Gfj!"JC I34TO THI)T NAM r-1D,DR rS a-8-------------�� -_sly_11� ------------ F- 5' 7a - --- --- ------- _ Za � -- - -----------------� ?��--� - - ------------ v 7 9 ---------------------------------------- --------------------G :y2-10cf,7G Sw J j6700 it/ v8 6sy C� 78y a a JANUARY ?b, 1957. WE, THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF 103TH AVENUE REOtUEST THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL BE CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING: 1. THAT 100TH AVENUE PE DE I CNATED AS A _.3Cr".L STpEET CONT I N IUOUSL-Y FROM DURHAM ROAD ALL THE WAY TO TLS=_' TUAI `iT I N R T VER FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: A. IT IS RELATIVELY LOW pOP(—AT I ON AND ESTARL I SHED FOt-' FAMILY DWELLING. B. THE HA7ARD OF ENTRANCE ONTO DURHAM ROAD FROM V13TH AYCINUE J)UE TO POOR VISIBILITY ON T13E LEFT (WEST? . C. TRAFF I G WCRL R-D BE BETTER SERVED py mAN_,I I;G C UT!_RE STRFC? AT APPPDX I MATELY 102NO A MINOR COLI.r-CTOR STPT-ET :WJE TO FF OPOSEL) APARTMENTS GOING INTO THAT VICINIT','- NAME ADDRESS ------------ • --'- - ----------------- _�j --- ---------�6�fS�_S� !�TN--------------- - - ---------- L - ,tea-_ - ---- -- --------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- k E t ---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------•------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- A --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- x A iii ,s� . r • �/JJJ` CITY OF TIGARD, _OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 11--86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission Riverwood and 108th Avenue Recommendation for Approval PREPARED BY: Keith Laden DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE �^ The purpose of this application is to re—evaluate the present street designations for 108th Avenue and Riverwood Lane. Minor collector streets are designed for through traffic and local streets are intended to provide access to adjoining parcels. Minor collector streets are typically wider, have larger curve radius requirements, and access tends to be limited to accommodate traffic flow. The present section of Riverwood Lane is built to local street standards; a through street or direct route between 92nd Avenue and 108th Avenue is presently required by the Plan. 108th Avenue will function as a minor collector but would be built to local street standards if the Plan is not amended. INFORMATION SUMMARY At the request of NPO N6, a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation for Riverwood Lane from a minor collector to a local street was proposed. The staff felt it was appropriate to consider 108th Avenue (classified as a local street) in conjunction with Riverwood Lane. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal to amend the Transportation Map to change Riverwood Lane from a minor collector to a local street and 108th Avenue from a local street to a minor collector. A copy of the Transportation Map, staff report, Commission minutes, and proposed ordinance are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the reclassification of Riverwood Lane to a local street and 108th Avenue (north of Kent Drive) to a minor collector and modify No. 9 on the Transportation Map Legend to read as follows: Indirect local street connections between 92nd Avenue and 108th Avenue. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the ordinance to reclassify Riverwood Lane to a local street and 108th Avenue (north of Kent Drive) to a minor collector and to change the wording of No. 9 on the Transportation Map as noted above. sb/2715P/0031P Y AGENDA ITEM 5.1 PLANNING COMMISSION December 2, 1986 MEMO TO: Planning Commission November 26, 1986 FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner RE: Comprehensive Plan street designation for Riverwood Lane and 108th Avenue The Tigard Comprehensive Plan which was adopted in November, 1983, included a transportation map which identified 108th Avenue as a local street and Riverwood Lane, between 92nd Avenue and 108th Avenue, as a minor collector. Staff recalls that the intent behind the Riverwood Lane designation was to provide a street connection rather than cul--de--sacs. The existing portion of Riverwood Lane is built to a local street standard. The Riverwood Lane issue was discussed during City Council review of the southernmost phase of Kneeland Estates (S 1-86). The Council affirmed that the street should connect with 92nd Avenue as contemplated by the Plan. Soon after, the designations tur 108th Avenue and Riverwood Lane were reviewed again by the Council in conjunction with the Dover Landing proposal (PD 2-86/S 7-86) It was concluded that Riverwood Lane (Kent Drive on the preliminary plat) would be built to a minor collector standard unless it was modified to a local street designation prior to recording the plat. 108th Avenue was }_ required to be constructed as a minor collector as a condition of approval because it was the opinion of the Engineering Division that this street would function as such given the development potential of the immediate area. The City Engineer has studied the present and proposed designations for 108th Avenue and Riverwood Lane. A report with recommendation is attached. E� 4, dj/2715P/0031P h �w PLANNING CONMIISSION December 2, 1986 - CPA 11-86 Page 1 .'.:. S ..... .... ....Y . TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT REVIEW OF STREET CLASSIFICATIONS RIVER OD LANE AND VICINITY November, 1986 Background ive Plan Transportation Map, currently Durham Road On the City's Comprehens shown as a major collector, 92nd Avenue is shown as a minor collector. for is plan is sh shown Lane is shown as a minor collector. In addition, 92nd and 108th $$connection of Riverwood Lane between no designation; however, the requirement for a Riverwood Lane connection SW 108th Avenue shows implies that 108th should also be a minor collector, as it is the westerly connection between Riverwood Lane and Durham Road. The Tualatin River makes southward extension of the street system unlikely. A deep ravine to the west of 108th makes it impractical to extend Riverwood Lane west of 108th. A subdivision has been approved which will extend Riverwood Lane astward rd to connect to 92nd Avenue. At the time the subdivision was approved, determined that it was not appropriate to extend Riverwood Lane east of 92nd Avenue. The existing portions of Riverwood Lane have been developed to local street standards. Sco of This Review_ f or Residents of Riverwood Lane collector.and NPO 06 This review isneto taddrassd that Riverwood Lane to be a mi question. The study area is bounded by Durham Road on the north, 92nd Avenue on the east, the Tualatin Rivith access only to Durham Roader on the south, and the ravine on the west, excluding properties w Assumptions The following assumptions have been made: 1. In existing subdivisions in the east portion of the study area, each vacant single—family residence; lot will be developed as one otherwise, the existing subdivisions will not change. 2. Subdivisions currently approved by the City or currently under review by the Planning Commission will be developed substantially as currently proposed, with one single—family residence on each lot. 3. The remaining land will be developed at the maximum density allowed z by the current zoning. Traffic Engineering Report CPA 11-86 Page 1 4. One additional access point will be provided to Durham Road, said access to be aligned with the existing 104th Avenue intersection. An existing City/County agreement for Durham Road allows no additional access points in the study area west of 104th. Under the agreement, an additional access point could be considered between 104th and Serena Court but preliminary planning indicates that such an access is unlikely to be developed. 5. Riverwood lane will be extended eastward to connect with 92nd Avenue as planned. 6. Access to 108th Avenue will be provided at three or more points along 108th. All of the study area west of 108th will have its access from ]08th. 7. There will be no need or demand for through traffic routes in the study area except on Durham Road and 92nd Avenue. The Tualatin River precludes north-south through traffic except for the 92nd access to Cook Park. likewise, the 108th/113th ravine precludes east-west through traffic south of Durham Road, 8. Motorists will use the shortest route available to access Durham Road. Traffic Generation In predicting traffic volumes,we have assumed 10 vehicle trips per day per single-family residence and 6 trips per day per apartment unit. These rates are based on national averages published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in the report titled Trip Generations Third Addition, In November, 1986, the City counted traffic volumes on the existing entrances to the subdivisions in the east portion of the study area. The counts showed average weekday traffic volumes (ADT) as follows: Location ADT Serena Court south of Durham 2249 Martha Street near 92nd 622 Millen Drive near 92nd 925 At the time of the traffic counts, these three streets provided the only access to an area with 376 existing single-family residences and with 8 additional single-family residences currently under construction. The counts indicate a traffic generation rate between 9.9 and ]O.1 trips per day per house, depending on whether we include those houses under construction. This _ appears to confirm the applicability of the national averages which we have used. Traffic Volume Predictions Based on the assumptions stated above, average weekday traffic volumes were predicted for the access points to each of the subareas shown on the attached map. The projected traffic volumes at full development are as follows: Traffic Engineering Report CPA 11-86 Page 2 Area Access Street Proiected ADT (vehicles/day) A 108 Ave. 5840 B 108 Ave 1070 C 104 Ave 3217 D Serena Court 2240 E Martha St. 920 F Millen Dr. 690 G Riverwood Lane 330 Obviously, drivers will not always conform to the boundaries used in projecting traffic volumes. However, we can expect that the boundary crossovers will tend to be balanced; i.e. , the number of Area C drivers who use the Area D access route should roughly equal the number of Area D drivers using the Area C access point. The projected volumes are at the main access point to each area. At points further from the access point, traffic volumes will be lower. These estimates are based on the assumptions of maximum densities in future development of those areas currently undeveloped. Actual development is commonly less than the maximum density allowed; so, actual traffic volumes in the west part of the study area may be less than estimated. Discussion Area A: The projected traffic volume on 108th Avenue at Durham Road is greater than we usually see on local residential streets. Extra width for turn lanes may eventually be needed on the north portion of 108th Avenue. Area B: The projected traffic volumes on the south portion of 108th Avenue are within the levels commonly experienced on local residential streets. Area C: The projected volume for 104th Avenue at Durham Road is rather high for a local street. At the time that the easterly portion of Area C is developed, an additional traffic review should be done. Depending on the density of the actual development, it may be appropriate to consider an additional access point to Durham Road between 104th and Serena Court. Area D: No change is forecast in the traffic on Serena Court, as Area D is already fully developed. Area E: The traffic on Martha Street will increase as development occurs on the remaining vacant lots in the area. The projected volume is approximately the same as the current volume on Millen Drive. Area F: The traffic volume on Millen Drive is expected to be reduced somewhat when Riverwood Lane is extended to connect with 92nd Avenue. Traffic Engineering Report CPA 11-86 Page 3 Area G: The projectd traffic volume on Riverwood Lane at 92nd is within the range commonly accepted on residential streets. General: While we usually discourage through traffic in residential areas, it is still desirable to provide connections between adjoining residential areas. The connections have the advantages of (1) better dispersing of the residential traffic to multiple access points, (2) providing alternate access when a street is blocked by an emergency or a roadway repair, (3) providing for pedestrian circulation, and (4) allowing trips within the residential neighborhood to occur without the need to access a collector road. Recommendations Based on the above analysis, the following actions are recowmended: 1. Reclassify Riverwood Lane from minor collector street to local street. 2. Eliminate the requirement that Riverwood Lane connect directly to 108th Avenue. 3. Designate 108th Avenue as a minor collector north of the proposed Kent Drive in Dover Landing Subdivision. 4. During review of current and future plats, provide for roadway connection between the various areas but avoid creating street alignments that appear as a through route between collector streets. 5. During review of future plats, include sufficient traffic analysis to evaluate the desirability of additional access points to 108th Avenue and to Durham Road Randall R. Wooley, P.E. City Engineer m$ 2715P `r+ Is ♦� �. 2 ONOM LL P.w�°`� CPA 11-86 Page 4 Traffic Engineering Report � • -fir!!, ._ ��■► 1111111111�mr1�1�tu���i= �',�' 11111111►�j��,� pmlive Iola goo �►- �r�� MAE amb SEE � t � r= ME r ! mow Its 111411 I� lab ILI ��1M �►s t /��yJi �� i ' S.r - /rr► � ;� / � � it \ A ■h � i � . or � ft it•'.� - �,,�� ' _ s .. ■ ■ IN pollI I .r TIGARD PLANNING COMISSION REGULAR MEETING — DECEMBER 2, 1986 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:38 PM. The meeting was held at the Tigard Civic Center — Town Hall Room — 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Owens, Fyre, Leverett, Peterson, Vanderwood, Newman, and Newton. Absent: Commissioner Butler. Staff: Senior Planner Keith Liden, City Engineer Randy Wooley, Assistant Planner Deborah Stuart, and Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner .Newton submitted corrections to staff. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioners Newman seconded to approve minutes with correcs"ons submitted by Commissioner Newton. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COPMIUNICATION There was no communication. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENOMENT CPA 11-86 CITY OF TIGARD NPO N 6 Request by NPO N 6 to modify the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map designation for SW Rive wood Lanefrom a minor collector street to a local street and -to change the designation for a portion of 108th from a local street to a minor collector. City Engineer Randy Wooley reviewed the Engineering report and made staff's recommendation to redesignate..9W Riverwood Lam to a local street and to redesignate ArA 109th, north '*#i0over Landing subdivision, to a minor collector. i Senior Planner Lidoin reed a =aor from NPO N 6 supporting staff's recommendation. He also read a, letter from Eugene Cummins, 9850 SW Kent Court, asking for approval. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o David Murray, 10115 SW- RiVOM006-11kn0 ' supported the City Engineers recommendation.- 0 ecommendation:o Wanetta Chamberlaip, 16720 $M 204th, d the proposal. o : Dan Graham, =10184-„SM viiwoo pported proposal since ` Rivervwod Lane is currontly built toD� 'eet. standa<nds PLANNING `D�CEMB�R'2: 199�5� �` Page 1 o Jim Isaacson, 9800 SW Riverwood Lane, supported designating Riverwood Lane as a local street but opposed expansion of Riverwood Lane because it would create increased traffic and vandalism problems. o Kim Condrin, 9600 SW Riverwood Lane, supported Jim Isaacson comments. o Mick McDonna, 9740 SW Riverwood Lane, supported redesignating of Riverwood Lane but did not support the extension of Riverwood Lane. o Stephen Petruzelli, 9980 SW Riverwood Lane, favored the local street designation, however, opposed any connections. o Rick Caffall, Rainier Bank, representing property owners along Riverwood Lane supported the redesignation. o Norm Harker, 1750 SW Skyline supported Engineering's recoeemendations. REBUTTAL o Randy Wooley, City Engineer, explained that this proposal only affected the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: o Discussion followed regarding how Riverwood Lane would connect with future development. Consensus of the Commission was to support redesignating to a Riverwood Lane to a local street and 108th, north ofDovera recommendations aborta minor collector. Discussion followed regarding should be forwarded to City Council. rd Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner rovale �of emac orne8 througto h Q CPA 11-86 to City Council recommending app of the City Engineer's recommendations. Motion failed. Commissioners Moen, Fyre, Leverett, and Newton, voting no. Commissioner Newman abstained. _ a Commissioner Newton moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to forward CPA 11-86 to City Council recommending approval of items one and throe of the City Engineer's recommendations. Motion failed 5 to 3. * Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward CPA 11-86 to City Council recommending approval of items one, two, and three of the City Engineer's recommendations. Motion carried by majority of -44 Commissioner present. Commissioner Moen and Newton voting no. Commissioner Newman abstained. 5.2 SUBDIVISION S 15-86, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 5-86 TITAN PROPERTIES NPO N 6 Request to divide a 15 acre property into 95 lots ranging between 4,400 and 6,000 square feet. Located: South of Durham Road at 104th (WCfl9 2S1 148, Tax lot 600 and 601). Senior Planner Liden reviewed that status of the application and clads staff's recommendation for approval. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEtMER 2, 1986 - Page 2 OW • w ` e F �W v t � O ~ f Z� W < N N �Hw--•MYr o O `�a ! f 0 s. : i-- - w .� = Z4Z • �W ; e .0 � � � Q : M e+� w O Z Z f = O S W j 2 N N J J a= s tw C W O 0 '! cr WE a. 1- -1 cc Z W (n IS �. i }� .�� i �Y o $ z !O �' M • O Wy a i u _ cn 40 •OA�•r �rt S � O t O e fl•� � � � � ■ '� w w �� �::i?}K:'.; Ott 0077! O• �r v u. u s 000 �+r r � .�;:?:6 a;'.{:n'i. t`Kci�'i�4 Q tD F co ob O wj w c O V` O '� G _ ` U s W {0� W 0 0 0 � p r Cl > r M p ��� 0 2 W V � • Q N� a a CrCr WZ n M oN oNd o QWQQ o OD0) � o 0 °' H o 4 j� IL Z Qc ao e $ o �c W W 0. 0. U a o }� V + sm Walk n�1� ■ tls�� !; 1; Tutuop /;� `` I tFr.�=, e� �,+ , • ;= 'c`a � ,TVA �,, - 1♦ lam k oil Moorl oil � .� .■ ■jiii •-, r F� ..A r till r. t srr� CITY OF TGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 12-86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission 135th Avenue recommendation for approval PREPARED BY: Keith S. Liden DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN O REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE With the Murray Blvd. extension being approved by Washington County, Beaverton and Tigard, it has become apparent that much of the traffic volume originally anticipated for SW 135th will be diverted to Murray Blvd. As a result, the existing major collector standard may be changed to a minor collector street. This will allow for a slightly narrower (40 ft. vs. 44 ft) pavement width. INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 6, 1987 the Planning Commission approved a proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan designation of 135th Avenue from a major collector to a minor collector street. A copy of the staff report, Planning Commission minutes, and proposed ordinance are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the change in designation For 135th Avenue (north of the Murray Road intersection) from a major collector to a minor collector. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT Cost savings will be realized during reconstruction of 135th Avenue if minor collector standards are used. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the ordinance to amend the Transportation Map designation for 135th Avenue (north of Murray) from a major to a minor collector street. KSL:bs0438W 3't MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AGENDA ITEM 5.5 TO: Planning Commission December 31, 1366 FROM: Keith Aiden, Senior Planner WV- , SUBJECT: Reclassification of SW 135th Avenue Randy Wooley, City Engineer, has prepared a report discussing the proposal to reclassify SW 135th Avenue from a major collector to a minor collector street. His report is attached and Randy will be available at the hearing to answer any questions. Kl:sb/0319W ,Av 4 ij 3 VT' k 4i4 4 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT REVIEW OF STREET CLASSIFICATIONS SW 135th AVENUE December, 1986 Pure2se In response to requests from residents of the area, the City Council has initiated a review of the classification of SW 135th Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard, Background The existing Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map was adopted in 1983. Attachment A is the portion of the Map in the vicinity of SW 135th Avenue. Attachment B explains the symbols which appear on the map. The Map designates SW 135th Avenue as a major collector street. The Map also calls for another connection between Scholls Ferry Road and SW 135th Avenue near Walnut Street. In 1986 an Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) was approved by the City and Washington County. The agreement better defines the alignment of the connection between Scholls Ferry Road and 135th Avenue. The alignment designated by the UPAA is shown in Attachment C. The proposed new road is referred to as Murray Boulevard Connection. Traffic Projections The existing Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map projected peak-hour traffic volumes for the rhour oyear to be the Murray vehicles BoulevardConnection.perhour n SW on Avenue and 730 vehicles per More recent data from the Metropolitan Service District * forecasts peak—hour traffic volumes in the area for the year 2005. MSD predicts peak—hour volumes on the Murray Boulevard Connection of approximately 800 vehicles per hour. For 135th Avenue, MSD predicts a peak—hour volume .of approximately 18o vehicles per hour. If the Murray Connection were not built, MSD predicts that 135th Avenue would carry a peak—hour volume of over 600 vehicles per hour by 2005. Factors Supporting Reclassification The following factors appear to support reclassification of SW 135th Avenue from major collector to minor collector. * January 17, 1986, memo from Andrew Cotugno, MSD Transportation Director, Boulevard Extension." regarding "Traffic Impacts associated with Murray 6 1. Traffic Volumes. The projected traffic volumes for SW 135th Avenue are similar to the volumes projected for other Tigard streets designated as minor collectors (e.g. , Forth Dakota Street, Tigard Street, Sattler Street, Summerfield Drive). A two-lane street is usually adequate for such traffic volumes with a turn lane added at critical intersections. A minor collector street standard appears to provide adequate capacity. 2. UPAA. when the Transportation Map was adopted in 1983, it appeared that 135th Avenue might need to function as a major through street for many years. However, since then the Urban Planning Area Agreement has defined the alignment for the Murray Boulevard connection and assures that the connection will be provided as development occurs. Construction is beim considered for 1887. Therefore, it now appears safe to plan for 135th Avenue as a minor collector and to rely on Murray Boulevard Connection to carry the major through traffic volumes. The alignments specified by the UPAA discourage use of 135th Avenue ;rye as a through route. 3. 'Actual development. The actual development occurring along 135th Avenue has been at a density somewhat lower than the densities allowed under the current zoning. As a result, actual traffic volumes along 135th Avenue may be somewhat lower than the projections indicate. Conclusions It was prudent in 1983 to designate SW 135th Avenue as a major collector, as a safeguard, in case the Murray Connection were not completed during the planning period. Subsequent actions appear to have made this safeguard unnecessary. Recommendation Based on the factors outlined above, it is recommended that the Transportation Map of the Comprehensive Plan be amended to show SW 135th Avenue as a minor collector between Scholls Ferry Road and the proposed Murray n° Boulevard Connection. Randall R. Wooley, City Engineer 1br2835P } � 1-�F mil 11%--i. ";` ��wwr► \ \saw low um ■moi �i� �• e �■ � .ria rt •.;. �#�i yrs ,s .� `,r/NII ► ' �.h�s. , � 7 � mss: ��•- ■N�rIt1 lfi itra.� S' .`: ::Rs::` i :riui7alti r �; less .0 r rr titH>n ��\t■t�lr�oil r � . � �— ■� of ♦♦ ♦�^ � �� �S7 -S� rF � t!1 JIM mw. \ yJ 6WA,'i��''�, ►ji►W.Myra :. s • • ��' n mu- NOWca `\\liUlpii. r, f.`�+♦moi;,_ : •��;.�.r� " _ rd n PAP Ad •� .jt�i',:r p• tv Y` t r•�ie t r f• r i • > 1 ' 1 LLJ C J Wcr cn Ix a s 0 O O Z = �= a IQ __—_.-- -' 0 all N if M Q 0 t 0 W M J J {— J W N W 00 J LL cc 0 J So i • IS o b� Ir cQ` cc n i ��rin a�♦♦ _. p kis Z49 1 a s go s ;♦ w LOA lie g u c x p U H W co O 0 O Z 0 > }- v�M W 0 0 0 0 -" -I- _ Z W o CV O Z o w CrWZ � � ON U) -J � a " oc» 4 a _ o z z v (D LLJ if u.. rG min `lI Q " Q ,'IL V Y H W O t! V _r -.r MURRAY..BLVD. CONNECTION: GENERAL ALIGNMENT �w KBIT B 602 601 601 107 604 301 800 100 600 108 101 100 1100 300 1101 , TIC • 1301 1200 1302 1300 { r 1 100 r `Z 201 \ �. - ._ ``- �^+• � 101 200 -MURRAY BLVD. CONNECTION JJ I• PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED a Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Fyre seconded to forward ZOA 9-86 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 10-86 CITY OF TIGARD / CODE AMENDMENT Request to amend Section 18.62.030 of the Community Development Code to allow a residential unit in conjunction with a permitted use for a caretaker in the C-G (Commercial General) zone. Also, to amend Section 18.106.030 (d) to establish a separate parking standard for mini-warehouse uses. Senior- -Planner Liden explained that whenever an application for a mini-warehouse has been applied for they also had to apply for a variance to the parking as the Code does not have special parking requirement for mini-warehouses. Also, the Code allows for a caretaker in the (I-L) Light Industrial zone but not in the C-G (General Commercial) zone, even when a conditional use approval has been granted. Discussion followed on the types of vehicles which could be left parking and whether retail uses could operate out of a mini warehouse unit. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED * Commissioner Newman moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward ZOA 10-86 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. Motion carried / unanimously by Commissioners present. V 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-86 CITY OF TIGARD NPO M 7 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation of SW 135th Avenue from SW Walnut Street to SW Scholls Ferry Road from a major collector to a minor collector street. City Engineer Randy Wooley made staff's recommendation for approval to change the designation of 135th from the Murray Blvd. extension to Scholls Ferry Road from a major to a minor collector. He explained that this recommendation had resulted from working with the property owners in that area to form a LID. Discussion followed regarding road standards for 135th, the Murray Blvd. extension, and improvements at the corner of 135th and Scholls Ferry Road. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CPA 12-86 to City Council with a recommendation to change the designation of 135th from the Murray Blvd. extension to Scholls Ferry from a major to a minor collector. . Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 6, 1987 Page 4 - _ .,. _ 7 � � c _ .. 5' .... .:' I _ .. .. _ �. - �. .. _ Y _.. c. � .,- t ._ ._.�, � ... � - _. .: .;' "" i . r Y .. �S � - f £r _ zL,... _ . ` '�_ '..♦ ._ .- - .. . C # _ � __ a '_ �� �_: C:. k' F" 3 i< Vv eat r:: f_`�y _ '� F_ , �^ i ��� � •�` �::. .., �$' :.:.,'�..y..,.i.t s.Ke..Via^x :..ve,.. .. `�'...F. ... .. _ u .. .. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ZOA 9-86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission Daycare recommendation for approyal PREPARED BY: Keith S. Liden DEPT HEAD OK �ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: LICISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 6, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended approval for a proposal by Russ Krueger to allow children's day care as a conditional use in the R-12, R-24, and R-40 residential zones. Children's day care is presently allowed as a conditional use in all single family residential zones. A copy of the applicant's narrative, staff report, Commission minutes, relevant Code Sections, and proposed ordinance are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the recommended change to allow children's day care in the R-12, R-25, and R-40 zones as conditional use. Section 18.130.050(c)(24)(A) must be modified by adding Multi-Family Residential as an applicable zone designation. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance to amend Sections 18.54.040, 18.56.040, 18.58.040, and 18.130.150(c)(24)(A) of the Community Development Code by adding children's day care as a conditional use. KSL:bs043OW R Y A N O B R I B N , Land Development and Planning Consultant 209 N.E. Lincoln Street, Suite "B" Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 (503) 648-4061 TO: City of Tigard Plannning Commission FROM Ryon O'Brien, Plannning Consultant SUBJECT: Community Development Code Amendment DATE: November 15, 1986 This application is a request to amend the Conditional Uses permitted in the R-12, R-20 and 1-0 Zones to include day care centers for children. This use is listed as a conditional Use in all other residential zones. The R-12 to R-40 zones are more intensive, and should therefore allow day care centers. It appears that day care centers were not intentionally left out and that if this deletion had been brought to the attention of the Planning Commission when the Community Development Code was adopted, day care centers probably would have been added to the R-12 to R-40 zones. This code amendment is consistant with the Comprehensive Plan, other sections of the Community Development Code, and LCDC Goals. Because of the higher density of multiple family housing compared to single family, the growing number of small children living with young families in apartment units, and the growing number of working mothers, location of day care centers next to multiple family housing is very important for convenience and reduction of automobile traffic. In most other communities, day care centers in multiple family areas is allowed and encouraged. wd7.kruegerl.536 a 't y MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AGENDA ITEM 5.3 TO: Planning Commission December 31, 1986 FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ZOA 9-86, Russ Krueger A. FACTS i. General Information CASE: Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 5-86 REQUEST: To allow children's day care as a conditional use in the R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre), R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre), and R-40 (Residential, 40 units/acre). APPLICANT: Russ Krueger 1335 SW 66th Avenue, No. 402 Portland, OR 97229 2. Background The R-12, R-25, and R-40 zone provisions were adopted by the City in November, 1983 as part of the City's revision of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Proposal Description The applicant is proposing to allow children's day care facilities as a conditional use in the R-12, R-24, and R-40 zones. The applicant indicates that this activity is allowed as a conditional use in all other residential zones. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO4 and 6 have no objection to the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Section 18.30.120 of the Community Development Code states that ordinance amendments shall be consistent with Statewide Planning Goals, Federal and State statutes, applicable plans adopted by Metro, applicable >f Comprehensive Plan policies, and relevant ordinances. No Plan policies apply directly to this application and none of the items noted above would conflict with this request. The staff agrees with the applicant's justification for the amendment. The allowance of day care facilities within areas that permit higher residential densities is appropriate in terms of convenience, compatibility between day care and more intensive residential use, and traffic impact. C. RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends approval of ZOA 9-86. KSL:bs2849 A f g yty S R -' '� �5+4�"v.,tr c�•Y d..J.-a': +a, '<a_. - .3 i>.. ,.�� _ t,h xc * Commissiahar -But16r moved 'and. Cogmk t +pear Newman seconded to approve SCE 11-66 vrith'fthQ.following conditions; �_.. The sign face will not ex ad the maximum of 90 square feet. 2 Tho sign height will not a" thq maUcmun height of 2 fget. Thio Sicjrt will be set blc fiixtLacaet Pram the property line. r 4. There will be nR let allowed on the counn of . 4 the sign,: Also. for at*ff' to prepare ilr i*l ardor a►Ngr Vice Presid to sign off on :that final Motion "rried by majority nota of Commissioners present. ` Comla#asiiDtiars t. Newton and, Vanderwood voting no. Commissioner Vanderwood reques�ed 'to be .t put in the record as being in favor of the proposal as submitted. -¢. f 5.3 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 9-86 RUSS KRUEGER / CODE AMENDMENT Request to amend Section 18.54.040, 18.56.040, and 18.58.040 of the Tigard Community Development Code to allow Children's Day Care as a Conditional Use permitted in the R-12 (Multi-Family Residential, 12 units/acre), R-25 (Multi.--Family Residential, 25 units/acre), and R-40+ (Multi-Family Residential, 40+ units/acre) zoning districts. Senior Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval. Discussion followed regarding what affect this proposal would have on LCDC's housing goal. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Russ Krueger, 1335 SW 66th Ave, #402, Portland, 97225 explained that there is a need for children's day care in the area of 135th and Scholls Ferry Road and that this would be the most logical way to allow for this type of use. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PLANNING COMM'IISSION MINUTES JANUARY 6, 1987 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED s Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Fyre seconded to forward ZOA 9-86 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 10-86 CITY OF TIGARD / CODE AMENDMENT Request to amend Section 18.62.030 of the Community Development Code to allow a residential unit in conjunction with a permitted use for a caretaker in the C-G (Commercial General) zone. Also, to amend Section 18.106.030 (d) to establish a separate parking standard for mini-warehouse uses. Senior Planner Liden explained that whenever an application for a mini-warehouse has been applied for they also had to apply. for a variance to the parking as the Code does not have special parking requirement for . mini-warehouses. Also, the Code allows for a caretaker in the (I-L) Light , Industrial zone but not in the C-G (General Commercial) zone, even when a conditional use approval has been granted. Discussion followed on the types of vehicles which could be left parking and whether retail uses could operate out of a mini-warehouse unit. conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43 (UNLISTED USES). 18.54.030 Permitted Uses Permitted Uses in the R-12 district are as follows: (1) Single family detached residential units (2) Duplex residential units - ' 2_ ZADtj 4c, (3) Single family attached residential units (4) multiple family dwellings residential units s (5) Group care residential F (6) Mobile home parks and subdivisions (7) Public support services (8) Residential Homes (Residential Care Facilities) t i (9) Manufactured Homes [ 18 54 040 Conditional Uses' (Chapter 18. 130) # 1� Conditional Uses in the R-12 district are as follows: I (1) Community recreation, including structures i•, (2) Religious assembly E. F (3) Schools, and related facilities (4) Utilitig'S l Li - 89 Rev. 12/85 (5) Group residential (6) Parking facilities (7) Hospitals x (8) Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly i 18 54 050 Dimensional Requirements Dimensional Requirements in the R-12 district are as follows: j i (1) The minimum lot size shall not be less than 3,050 square feet per unit. (2) There is no minimum lot width requirement. (3) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, the minimum setback requirements are as follows: (A) For multiple family dwellings, the front yard setback ,hall he a minimum of 20 feet. For single family i� , conditional use. it may be held to be a similar• unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43 (UNLISTED USES). 1 .56 030 Permitted Uses Permitted Uses in the R-25 district are as follows: (1) Single family detached residential units (2) Duplex residential units ��" (3) Single family attached residential units (4) Multiple family dwellings (5) Group care facilities (6) Mobile home parks and subdivisions (7) Public support services (8) Residential Homes (Residential Care Facilities) (9) Manufactured Homes 18 56 040 Conditional Uses (Chatpter 18.130) Conditional Uses in the R-25 district are as follows: (1) Community recreation, including structures (2) Religious assembly (3) Schools, and related facilities (4) Utilities Rey. 1270,, ]:II _ 92 (5) Group residential (6) Parking facilities (7) Hospitals (8) Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly 18 56 050 Dimensional Requirements Dimensional Requirements in the R-25 district are as follows: {1) The minimum lot size shall be: (A) For a single family detached unit, 3,050 square feet. k (6) For each attached single family unit, 3,050 square ` ,1a feet. (C) For a duplex, 6,100 square feet, or 3,050 square feet for each unit. 6,300 square (D) For a boarding, lodging or roonirig house; conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43 (UNLISTED USES). 18.58.030 Permitted Uses Permitted Uses in the R--40 district are as follows: (1) Single family detached residential units (2) Duplex residential units (3) Single family attached residential units (4) Multiple family dwellings residential units 'f�a1JL�- (5) Group residential (6) Group care residential (7) Mobile home parks and subdivisions (8) Public support services (9) Residential Homes (Residential Care Facilities) (10) Manufactured Homes 18.58.040 Conditional Uses (Chapter 18.130) Conditional. Uses in the R--40 district are as follows: (1) community recreation, including structures (2) Religious assembly (3) Schools And related facilities 4 ]ll 95 Rev 1?!N' 1. (4) Utilities (5) Parking facilities ® (6) Hospitals (7) Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly 18.58.050 Dimensional Re uirements Dimensional Requirements in the R-40 district are as follows: (1) There is no minimum lot area per unit. , (2) There is no minimum lot width requirement. (3) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, the minimum setback requirements are as follows: (A) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet. (B) On corner and through lots, the minimum setback for (22) Manufactured Home Subdivisions (J) Applicable Zones: R-3, R-4.5. (K) Minimum Lot Size: see applicable zone. (L) Minimum 1_ot Dimensions: see applicable zone. IV t3 (M) Minimum Setbacks: see applicable zone. I T. 13£'.Dsc) t (N) Height Limitations: see applicable zone. s (0) Off Street Parking: See Chapter 18.06 for applicable zone. (P) Landscaping and Screening: See Chapter 18. 100. (23) Automobile and Equipment Sales and Rental: Equipment and Repair - L%9 t (A) Applicable Zone: General Commercial. (8) Minimum Lot Size: see applicable zone. (C) Minimum Setbacks: see applicable zone, and a 5-foot landscaping strip between right-of-way line and auto display area. (D) Height Limitation: see applicable zone. (E) Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements: see Chapter 18.106 for applicable use. (F) Screening in accordance with Chapter 18. 100. L' (24) Group Residential (Children's Day Care . ✓(A) Applicable Zone: Single family residential, CAB. (8) Minimum Lot .Size: 5,000 square feet. (C) Minimum Setbacks: see applicable zone. (D) Height Limitation: see applicable zone. (E) State certification in accordance with ORS 418.805 418.885. (F) Off-street parking in accordance with `ectickn 18.106.030 b.3. f (25) Eating and Drinking Establishments. { (A) Applicable Zone: Neighborhood Commercial. L' III 264 Rev 9!86 '7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ZOA 10-86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission recommendation for a royal PREPARED BY: Keith Liden DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTIU BY: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 6, 1987, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a proposal to establish a separate parking standard for mini-warehouses and to allow a residential unit for a caretaker in conjunction with a commercial business in the C-G zone. Attached is a copy of the staff report, Commission minutes, and proposed ordinance. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the creation of a mini-warehouse parking standard and allow a caretaker residence in the C-G zone. 2. Deny the proposal. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance to amend Community Development Code Section 18.106.030 to establish a parking requirement for mini-i,uarehouses and Section 18.62.030 to allow a caretaker residence in the C-G zone. KSL:bs0438W AGENDA ITEM 5.4 PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 6, 1987 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Commission p�� December 30, 1986 FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner P'" SUBJECT: ZOA 10-86 - Sections 18.62.030 and 18.106.030 The Planning staff is proposing two amendments to the sections noted above to address existing problems in the Community Development Code that relate to mini-warehouse facilities. The amendments pertain to provision of residential quarters and separate parking standards. The Community Development Code presently allows the following in the I-P (Industrial Park), I-L (Light Industrial), and I-H (Heavy Industrial) zones: (5) A single-family detached unit or a single manufactured/mobile home provided that the uses are limited to the following: (A) A dwelling for a caretaker or superintendent which is located on the same site with the permitted industrial use and is occupied exclusively by a caretaker or superintendent of the industrial use and family; or (B) A dwelling for a kennel owner or operator which is located on the same site with the kennel and is occupied exclusively by the owner or operator of the kennel and family. The mini-warehouse operations within the City and elsewhere typically include a residence for a caretaker. A mini-facility is a conditional use in the C-G (Commercial General) zone, but a provision for a related residential unit is not permitted. The proposed wording below will allow for a residential unit in conjunction with a commercial activity in the C-G zone: Section 18.62.030 (4) A single-family unit provided that it is located on the same site with a permitted use in Section 18.62.030 or .040 and is occupied exclusively by a caretaker or superintendent of the permitted use and family. The second portion of this proposal will add a specific parking standard for mini-warehouse uses. Presently, mini-warehouse is grouped under the use category of wholesale storage and distribution which contemplates employees. A parking standard of one space per 1,000 square feet or employee applies to this use. Mini-warehouse uses have few employees (usually one or two) and large amounts of square footage. Customers need a parking space primarily to begin or terminate a lease and otherwise parking is done in front of the storage spaces for loading and unloading. Staff recommends that Section 18.106.030(d) of the Code be amended by adding the following provision: (3) Mini-warehouse 1 space for every 200 square feet of gross office floor area, plus 2 spaces for a caretaker residence. KSL:bs2837P PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Vanderwaod moved and Commissioner Fyre seconded to forward ZOA 9-86 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 10-86 CITY OF TIGARD / CODE AMENDMENT Request to amend Section 18.62.030 of the Community Development Code to allow a residential unit in conjunction with a permitted use for a caretaker in the C--G (Commercial General) zone. Also, to amend Section 18.106.030 (d) to establish a separate parking standard for mini-warehouse uses. Senior Planner Liden explained that whenever an application for a mini-warehouse has been applied for they also had to apply for a variance to the parking as the Code does not have special parking requirement for mini-warehouses. Also, the Code allows for- a caretaker in the (I-L) Light Industrial zone but not in the C-G (General Commercial) -none, even when a conditional use approval has been granted. Discussion followed on the types of vehicles which could be left parking and whether retail uses could operate out of a mini--warehouse unit. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED * Commissioner Newman moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward ZOA 10--86 to City Council with a recommendation for approval. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12--86 CITY OF TIGARD NPO q 7 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation of SW 135th Avenue from SW Walnut Street to SW Scholls Ferry Road from a major collector to a minor collector street. City Engineer Randy Wooley made staff' s recommendation for approval to change the designation of 135th from the Murray Blvd, extension to Scholls Ferry Road from a major to a minor collector. tie explained that this recommendation had resulted from working with the property owners in that area to form a LID. Discussion followed regarding road standards for 135th, the Murray Blvd. extension, and improvements at the corner of 135th and Scholls Ferry Road. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED * Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CPA 12-86 to City Council with a recommendation to change the designation t of 135th from the Murray Blvd. extension to Scholls Ferry from a major to _k : a minor collector. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 6, 1987 Page 4 <� 1., CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY e AGENDA OF: January 26 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 14, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Durham Road PREVIOUS ACTION: None Jurisdiction Request PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPT HEAD 01 TY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Comm. Dev. Dept. POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council request jurisdiction of SW Durham Road from SW 99 to SW Serena Court from Washington County. INFORMATION SUMMARY On April 14, 1986 the City Council adopted Resolutions 86-46 and 86-47 requesting that Washington County relinquish jurisdiction of certain roads or parts thereof within the City to the City for the purpose of improving CIP Planning, Development and Maintenance services. At that time, portions of Durham Road west of SW Serena Court were not within the City limits so only that portion of Durham Road east of Serena Court has transferred to the City's jurisdiction. On January 15, 1987, the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission annexed those portions of Durham Road remaining in unincorporated Washington County to the City. It is now appropriate to request jurisdiction of Durham Road from 99W to Serena Court from Washington County. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution initiating transfer of jurisdiction of SW Durham from Hwy. 99W to Serena Court to the City of Tigard. 2. Take no action. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION i. Adopt the attached resolution. EAN:cn/2898P Y 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approve Aerial PREVIOUS ACTION: None Mapping Contract with Spencer Gross, ' Inc. - $25,000 PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno ! DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Development Services POLICY ISSUE Ordinance 85-06, Local Contract Review Board Administrative Rules, Section 70.010 - Personal Service Contracts, exempted from competitive bidding. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard has budgeted monies this year for aerial mapping services. Late last fiscal year and early this fiscal year the cities of Beaverton and Wilsonville entered into contracts with Spencer B. Gross, Inc. for aerial mapping services. The City of Tualatin had also considered a similar contract, however funding could not be obtained. This presented the City of Tigard with the opportunity to obtain similar services in a very cost affective manner. Two aerial mapping firms in addition to Spencer Gross, Inc. were contacted regarding the services that the City needed and two submitted proposals. After careful raview of these proposals staff is recommending that the City enter into a contract with Spencer B. Gross, Inc. to provide aerial mapping services. Spencer B. Gross, Inc. has provided these services for the City in the recent past for special projects and the quality has been excellent. The attached proposed contract for $25,000 will update all City topography mapping which has not been done since 1974. -- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Enter into a contract with Spencer B. Gross, Inc. for $25,000 to update all City topography mapping. 2. Do not enter into a contract with Spencer B. Gross, Inc. for aerial mapping services. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for this service are budgeted in accounts 10-22400-601 ($14,000 - Engineering Professional Services) and 10-61200-751 ($11,000 - Wastewater Capital Projects). SUGGESTED ACTION ' Staff recommends the Board authorize the City Administrator to enter into the attached Personal Services contract with Spencer B. Gross, Inc. for $25,000 to provide aerial mapping services for the City. gid' RC:cn/0418W — 1 — CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TITLE: Fiscal Year 86-87 Aerial/ToDographv Mapping Update CONTRACT NO. wG. This Contract, made and entered into this „¢7 ti da y of 19 , by and between the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation f the r State of Oregon, hereinafter called "City" and (full name and address of person or firm) Spencer B. Gross Inc. Consulting Engineers 13545 N.W. Science Park Drive Portland OR 97229 hereinafter called "Contractor", duly authorized to perform such services in Oregon. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City requires services which Contractor is capable of providing, under terms and conditions hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, Contractor is able and prepared to provide such services as City does hereinafter require, under those terms and conditions set forth; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION of those mutual promises and the terms and conditions set forth hereafter, the parties agree as follows: 1. Term. Z/ The term of this Agreentntr h�be from the-�-��ta day of January , 1987 to and including the of April unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereof. 2. Services. Contractor's services under this Agreement shall consist of the following: A. SBG agrees to provide the following to the City: 1. Aerial photography of the City at two scales 1" = 5001 and 1" = 1000' . 2. One set of contact prints of the aerial photography. 3. A photo center Index of the photographs. L. 2 - 4. Topographic mapping at a scale of 1" = 100' with 2' contour interval on one-quarter section sheet format. Sheets to be updated or remapped are identified by priority on a schedule attached as "Exhibit B." 5. Digital capture of all new mapping data for later inclusion in the City's computer data base. B. The City agrees to provide the following to SBG: 1. Ground control surveys of all points necessary for the mapping project. 2. A map displaying the location and identity of all ground control points. 3. A list of coordinates of all section and quarter-section corners which are used as sheet boundaries. 4. A list of coordinates and elevations of the ground control points. 5. Identification of all features; such as, streets, principal buildings, etc. to be captured on the map sheets and/or in digital form. 6. Existing map sheets of all quarter sections to be updated or remapped. ,aA - C. Use of photography and Survey Control: It is mutually agreed that the aerial photography and the ground survey control may be used by SBG to produce maps for other interested parties provided: The City is given a copy of the map; or, the City may elect to completely map the quarter section sheet or sheets containing the area and share the cost with the interested party. D. All mapping shall meet National Map Accuracy Standards; which is +_ one-half contour interval vertically, and + .025" for placement of planimetric features from their true position. These positions are dependent on the accuracy of survey control as furnished by the City. Any deficiencies shall be corrected promptly. 3. Contractor Identification. Contractor shall furnish to City its employer identification number, as designated by the Internal Revenue Service, or Contractor's Social Security 3 number, as City deems applicable. �_. Federal Id. No. = 93-0905585 State Witholding No. = 065154-7 SAIF No. = 224031-108 State Employment No. = 360184-6 3 - 4. Compensation. The City agrees to pay SBG for the services and products listed in A as follows: Option 1 — Updating existing sheets per 10% change of features per map sheet. 1st 10% $350.00 each additional 10% $225.00 Option 2 -- Remapping per one-quarter section map sheet. Developed Area $2500.00 Undeveloped Area $1500.00 SBG will invoice the City monthly for work completed and the City agrees to pay within 30 days. The total amount invoiced for FY 1986-87 will not exceed $25,000. After notice to proceed, SBG will begin with the highest priority map sheet and continue with the next priority map sheets until the "not to exceed" amount is reached. Payment by the City shall release the City from any further obligation for payment to Contractor for service performed or expenses incurred as of the date of the statement of services. B. City certifies that sufficient funds are available and authorized for expenditure to finance costs of this contract. 5. Contractor Is Independent Contractor. A. Contractor's services shall be provided under the general supervision of CAty's project director or his or her designee, but Contractor shall be an independent contractor for all purposes and shall be entitled to no compensation other than the compensation provided for under paragraph 4 of this Agreement. B. In the event Contractor is to perform the services described in this Agreement without the assistance of others, Contractor hereby agrees to file a joint declaration with City to the effect that Contractor's services are those of an independent contractor, as provided under Chapter 864 Oregon Laws 1979. C. Contractor acknowledges that for all purposes related to this agreement, Contractor is and shall be deemed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of City, shall not be entitled to benefits of any kind to which an employee of the City is entitled and shall be solely responsible for all payments and taxes required by law; and furthermore ;n the event that r.- Contractor is found by a -court of law or an administrative agency to be an employee of the City for any purpose, City shall be entitled to offset compensation due to demand repayment of any amounts paid to Contractor under the terms of this agreement, to the full extent of any benefits or other renumeration Contractor receives (from City or third party) as a result of said finding and to the full extent of any payments that City is required to make (to Contractor or to a third party) as a result of said finding. 4 — D. The undersigned Contractor hereby represents that no employee of the City of Tigard, or any partnership or corporation in which a City employee has an interest, will or has received any remuneration of any description from the Contractor, either directly or indirectly, in connection with the letting or performance of this contract, except as specifically declared in writing. 6. Subcontracts — Assignment & Delegation A. Contractor shall not subcontract or permit any portion of the work to be further subcontracted except as provided in the proposal without the prior written approval of City, and Contractor shall be fully responsible for the acts or omissions of any subcontractors and of all persons employed by them, and neither the approval by City of any subcontractor nor anything contained herein shall be deemed to create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and City. B. This agreement, and all of the covenants and conditions hereof, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Contractor respectively and their legal representatives. Contractor shall not assign any rights nor delegate any duties incurred by this contract, or any part hereof without the written consent of City, and any assignment or delegation in violation hereof shall be void. 7. Contractor — Payment of Benefits — Hours of Work A. The Contractor shall: (1) make payment promptly, as due, to all persons supplying to suchr Contractor labor or material for the prosecution of the work provided for in this contract; (2) pay all contributions or, amount due the Industrial Accident Fund from such Contractor or subcontractor s incurred in the performance of this contract; (3) not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecuted against the City of Tigard, on account of any labor Department of Revenue all sums withheld to the Oe or material furnished; (4) pay P from employees pursuant to ORS 316.167. i B. The Contractor agrees that if the Contractor fails, neglects or refuses to make 'prompt payment of any claim for labor or services furnished to the Contractor or a subcontractor by any person in connection with this contract as such claim becomes due, the proper office of the City of Tigard may pay such claim to the person furnishing the labor or services and change the amount of the payment against funds due or to become due the Contractor by reason of such contract. Payment of a claim in this manner shall not relieve the Contractor or the Contractor's surety from obligation with respect to any unpaid claims. C. Contractor agrees that no person shall be employed for more than eight (8) hours in any one day, or forty (40) in any one week, except in cases of necessity, emergency or where the City of Tigard absolutely requires it, and in such cases the laborer shall be paid at least time and a half pay for all overtime in excess of eight (8) hours a day and for work performed on Saturday and on any legal holiday as specified in ORS 279.334. D. No City employee shall be required to work overtime or on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday in the fulfillment of this contract except where the Contractor agrees to reimburse the City in the amount of money paid the employee for such work as determined by state law, the City's personnel rules or union agreement. The Contractor shall require every subcontractor to comply with this requirement. 5 — 8. Contractor's Employees Medical Payments Contractor agrees to pay promptly as due, to any person, copartnership, association or corporation furnishing medical, surgical, and hospital care or other needed care and attention incident to sickness or injury to the Contractor's employees, all sums which the Contractor agreed to pay for such services and all moneys sums l h Contractor or deducted from employees wages pursuant for providing or paying for such service. 9. Early Terminatiun A. This Agreement may be terminated without cause prior to the expiration of the agreed upon term as provided by ORS 279.326 as follows: 1. By mutual written consent of the parties; 2. By either party upon 30 days' written notice to the other, delivered by certified mail or in person; or 3. By City, effective upon delivery of written notice to Contractor by certified mail or in person, under any of the following conditions: (insert as appropriate). B. Payment of Contractor shall be as provided by ORS 279.330 and shall be prorated to and include the day of termination and shall be in full satisfaction of all claims by Contractor against City under this Agreement. C. Termination under any provision of this paragraph shall not liability of Contractor or City which accrued affect any right, obligation or prior to such termination. 10. Cancellation for Cause City may cancel all or any part of this Contract if Contractor breaches any of the terms hereof or in the event of any of the following: r involuntary petition in bankruptcy by Insolvency of Contractor; voluntary o or against Contractor; appointment of a receiver or trustee for Contractor, or an assignment for benefit of creditors of Contractor. Damages for breach shall be those allowed by Oregon law, reasonable and necessary attorney's fees, and other costs of litigation. 11. Access to Records City shall have access to such books, documents, papers and records of Contractor as are directly pertinent to this Agreement for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcripts. 12. Work is Property of City All work performed by Contractor under this Agreement shall be the { property of City. — 6 — 13. Adherence to Law A. Contractor shall adhere to all applicable laws governing its relationship with its employees, including but not limited to laws, rules, regulations and policies concerning workers' compensation, and minimum and prevailing wage requirements. B. To the extent applicable, the Contractor represents that it will comply with Executive Order 11246 as amended, Executive Order 11141, Section 503 of the vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and all rules and regulations issued pursuant to the Acts. C. As provided by ORS 279.315, all applicable provisions of federal, state or local statutes, ordinances and regulations dealing with the prevention of environmental pollution and the preservation of natural resources that affect the work under this contract are by reference incorporated herein to the same force and affect as if set forth herein in full. if the Contractor must undertake additional work due to the enactment of new or the amendment of existing statutes, ordinances or regulations occurring after the submission of the successful bid, the City shall issue a Change Order setting forth the additional work that must be undertaken. The Change Order shall not invalidate the Contract and there shall be, in addition to a reasonable extension, if necessary, of the contract time, a reasonable adjustment in the contract price, if necessary, to compensate the Contractor for all costs and expenses incurred, including overhead and profits, as a result of the additional work. = 14. Changes ., City_ may at any time, and without notice, issue a written Change Order requiring additional work within the general scope of this Contract, or h any amendment thereto, or directing the omission of or variation in work. If such Change Order results in a material change in the amount or character of the work, an equitable adjustment in the Contract price and other provisions of this Contract as may be affected may be made. Any claim by Contractor for an adjustment under this section shall be asserted in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt by Contractor of the notification of change or the claim will not be allowed. Whether made pursuant to this section or by mutual agreement, no change shall be binding upon City until a Change Order is executed by the Authorized Representative of City, which expressly states that it constitutes a Change Order to this Contract. The issuance of information, advice, approvals, or instructions by City's Representative or other City personnel shall not constitute an authorized change pursuant to this section. Nothing contained in this sections shall excuse the contractor from proceeding with the prosecution of the work in accordance with the Contract, as changed. 15. Force Maieure Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default because of F any delays in completion of responsibilities hereunder due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence on the part of the party so disenabled, including, but not restricted to, an act of God or of a public enemy, volcano, earthquake, fire, flood, epidemic, quarantine, restriction, - 7 - area-wide strike, freight embargo, unusually severe weather or delay of subcontractor or suppliers due to such cause; provided that party so disenabled shall within ten (10) days from the beginning of such delay notify the other party in writing of the causes of delay and its probable extent. Such notification shall not be the basis for a claim for additional compensation. 16. Nonwaiver The failure of the City to insist upon or enforce strict performance by Contractor of any of the terms of this contract or to exercise any rights hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its right to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any future occasion. 17. Warranties Contractor warrants that all practices and procedures, workmanship and materials shall be the best available unless otherwise specified in the profession. Neither acceptance of the work nor payment therefore shall relieve Contractor from liability under warranties contained in or implied by this contract. 16. Attorney's Fees In case suit or action is instituted to enforce the provisions of this contract, the parties agree that the losing party shall pay such sum as the Court may adjudge reasonable attorney's fees and court costs including attorney's fees and court costs on appeal to appellate courts. 19. Applicable Law This contract will be governed by the laws of the State of Oregon. 20. Conflict Between Terms It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the proposal of the contractor, this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the said terms of said proposal conflicting herewith. 21. Indemnification Contractor agrees to indemnify and to hold-harmless the City, its Officers, Employees and Agents against and from any and all loss, claims, actions, suits, including costs and attorneys' fees, for or on account of injury bodily or otherwise, to, or death of persons, damage to or destruction of property belonging to City, Contractor or others, resulting from, arising out of, or in any way connected with Contractor's activities hereunder, excepting only such injury or harm as may be caused solely by the fault or R negligence of the City, its Officers, Employees and/or Agents. 22. Insurance Prior to starting work hereunder, Contractor, at Contractor's cost, shall secure and continue to carry during the term of this Contract, with an insurance company acceptable to City, the following insurance: — 8 — A. The Contractor shall carry General Liability Insurance with an umbrella coverage to 81,000,000. a copy of which will be furnished to the City. Such insurance shall cover all risks arising directly or indirectly out of Contractor's activities or work hereunder, including the operations of its subcontractors of any tier. Such insurance shall include provisions or endorsements naming City, its Officers, Employees and Representatives as , additional insureds' , provisions that such insurance is primary insurance with respect to the interests of the City and that any other insurance maintained by City is excess and not contributory insurance with the insurance required hereunder; cross—liability or severability of interest clause; and provisions t that such policies shall not be cancelled or its limits of liability reduce without thirty (30) days prior notice to City. A copy of each insurance policy, certified as a true copy by an authorized representative of the issuing insurance company, or at the discretion of City, in lieu thereof, a certificate in form satisfactory to City certifying to the issuance of such insurance shall be furnished to City. B. Workman's Compensation from the State Accident Insurance Fund or from a responsible private carrier. Private insurance shall provide the schedule of employee benefits required by law. 22. Complete Agreement t This contract and any referenced attachments constitute the complete p agreement between the City and Contractor and supercedes all prior written or t; oral discussions or agreements. e CITY F TIGARO By a C. v_car e_r CONTRACTOR l^ / By By t cn168/cn4 i � - E • i 9 a 4 (Corporate Seal) (C rporation) By (P ident) By (Secretary) STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington) PersonallyO % appeared who being du y sworn di sa that he/she is the president of atha the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of nd said corporation and that said instrument wasY%ignand sealed in behalf ofsaid corporation by authority of its BoaDirectors; ahelshe acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntarnd deed. \ " Before me: Notary Public f r Oregon (Notary Seal) Il 0My commission expires: r - �_l 10 - ( rporation) (Corporate Seal) By (Pr sdent) By (Secretary) STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington) Personally J appeared ' ident who being dul ,i^7 sworn did say hat he/she is the pros of and hat the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors; and - he/she acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary t and deed. Before me: No ary Public for Oregon (Notary Seal) My Commission expires: A60 . cnib8/cn4 City of Tigard FY 86-87 Aerial Mappirg Update Exhibit "B" s A. Quarter Sections to be "new" mapped New mapping consist of capturing all feature types that now appear on existing line maps. Finish product to be a reproducible mylar with similar title block and size of existing mapping. All features will be coded for future computer manipulation: s Township 1 South, Range 1 West Description Existing Map No. 1. Southeast Quarter - Section 33 4216 2. Northwest Quarter - Section 35 4119 Township 2 South, Range 1 West Description Existing Map No. 1. Southeast Quarter - Section 12 4622 2. Northeast Quarter - Section 13 4722 3. Northwest Quarter - Section 14 4719 B. Quarter Sections to be updated Updates will capture all feature types that now exist on existing line t maps. Updated areas will be shown on existing mylar line maps. Data may be €_ coded for future computer manipulation. Maps to be completed in the following priority order until service contract amount is reached. 1 Township 1 South, Range 1 West Description Existing Map No. 1. Northwest Quarter - Section 33 4116 2. Southwest Quarter - Section 33 4215 a 3. Northwest Quarter - Section 34 4117 4. Southwest Quarter - Section 34 4217 5. Northwest Quarter - Section 34 4118 6. Southwest Quarter - Section 34 4218 7. Southwest Quarter - Section 35 4219 8. Southwest Quarter - Section 35 4220 9. Southwest Quarter - Section 36 4221 10. Southwest Quarter - Section 36 4222 11. Northwest Quarter - Section 36 4122 f s Township 2 South, Range 1 blest k Description Existing Map No. 1. Northwest Quarter — Section 1 4322 2. Northwest Quarter — Section 1 4321 3. Southwest Quarter — Section 1 4422 4. Southwest Quarter — Section 1 4421 5. Northwest Quarter — Section 2 4320 6. Southwest Quarter — Section 2 4420 7. Southwest Quarter — Section 2 4419 B. Northwest Quarter - Section 2 4319 9. Northwest Quarter — Section 3 4318 10. Southwest Quarter — Section 3 4418 11. Northwest Quarter — Section 3 4317 12. Southwest Quarter — Section 3 4417 13. Northwest Quarter — Section 4 4316 14. Southwest Quarter — Section 10 4618 15. Northwest Quarter — Section 10 4518 16. Northwest Quarter — Section 10 4517 17. Northwest Quarter — Section 11 4520 18. Southwest Quarter — Section it 4619 19. Southwest Quarter — Section 11 4620 20. Northwest Quarter — Section 11 4519 21. Northwest Quarter — Section 12 4521 22. Southwest Quarter — Section 12 4621 23. Northwest Quarter — Section 12 4522 24. Northwest Quarter — Section 13 4721 25. Northwest Quarter — Section 14 4720 is/50 r y, CITY OF TIGARD- OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: January 16, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Repart PREVIOUS ACTION: December, 1986 — Community Dev. Dept PREPARED BY: William A. Manahan DEPT HEAD O ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached please find the Monthly Report for December, 1986 prepared by the Department of Community Development. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Accept and place in file. - FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place in file. (095OP/dOO22P) i�; MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD T0: Members of the City Council January 16, 1987 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development 44�A '�`�' SUBJECT: Monthly Report - December, 1986 The Department of Community Development reports the following December activity: - Building Permits - December activity was substantially higher than that of December, 1985. We attribute this to the and of the year by some builders to take advantage of the tax laws. The total construction activity for 1986 was very impressive with five year highs in the number of single-family permits issued, 415, the valuation of new construction, $45,083,932, Building Permit Fees, $198,311, and Plan Check Fees s $105,641. It was a very good year. Projection for the remainder of the Fiscal Year are equally positive. Through the first six months of the new year, we are ahead of the prior year in all areas of permits issued, as well as fees generated. All signs point to 1987 being even stronger than 1986. We now have full time staff in place and authorized to handle the projected inspection activity. - Jerry Mcllburlin, Operations Superintendent, resigned from his position to y accept a similar job with the City of Coos Say. His responsibilities have been divided among the Crew Chiefs while we recruit for a replacement. The City Center Task Force was formed to work with the staff and Portland State university to formulate a revitalization plan for the downtown area. Planning staff resources have been increased, allowing the staff to develop a strong data base for the study. A study of vision clearance violations was initiated. City staff are identifying problem intersections which have fences, structures, and =s vegetation in violation of the Community Development Code vision clearance restrictions. A concerted effort to enforce the code will be undertaken during the next few months. (WAM:br/095OP/0022P) BUILDING SECTION — DECEMBER COMPARISON (Calendar Year) Following is a comparison of building activity for December of 1985 and 1986: December, 1985 December, 1986 ;; Single Family Permits 18 20 Multi—Family Permits (units) 0 10 Commercial Permits (new) 1 1 Building Permit Fees $ 7,964.00 $ 9,897.50 Plan Check Fees $ 4,653.09 $ 5,065.45 Plumbing Permits $ 2,325.00 $ 2,677.00 Mechanical Permits $ 851.00 $ 585.50 Valuation $1,563,466.00 $2,208,000.00 Jan. — Dec. 1985 Jan. Dec.,, 1986 Single Family Permits 277 415 Multi—Family Permits 342 132 Commercial Permits 20 27 Building Permit Fees $ 167,311.67 $ 198,311.36 Plan Check Fees $ 74,559.29 $ 105,641.32 Plumbing Permits $ 76,862.28 $ 70,304.90 Mechnical Permits $ 10,633.15 $ 15,033.50 Valuation $41,525,590.00 $45,083,932.00 FISCAL YEAR COMPARISON 1985/86 -- 1986/87 July — December 1985 July— December 1966 Single Family Permits 142 191 Multi-Family Permits 10 26 Commercial Permits 14 15 Building Permit Fees $ 73,991.17 $ 91,017.64 Plan Chock Fees $ 36,577.49 $ 48,964.66 Plumbing Permits $ 22,285.00 $ 37,967.00 Mechnical Permits $ 5,120.65 $ 9,328.00 Valuation $16,975,091.00 $19,856,026.00 (br/0950P) M Y sL N N w .y N f .. w N w .ti .y N �I N N O N O O b O f O O O O O O O O 8 O O O O O M w a .+� m P en rn O b en Jf en A e.f en O w • M P • f A f • O T f f N f f M N Mw N N N N N M �" to 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 g hof w P N M O M M N N M I.. N .Ai N A b A M O A W 6n -Wb K P a N A • f P P • P �O O Al A 7� • M • 1 � Q po p p 8 p $p p p M Q� s s 8 O 8 S 8 8 8 8 g 8 g 8 8 9C44rz pq N M N M M A Nf P 7'A� ^ f P P �O P -O N I A N N P N M M OW P N O N SOI P N .4 b A O' m I �tf P1 X11! f • b P • m N 0. N .+ .wi .•r P f At M N N �+ i W0. O M M A 1.1 f ♦ N N P I Q M O P O �p we b N P b Apo P M I � i O A Q w A A P i•V M• �O M b aw Obi ."� h f M N • .M P • Q � P A A MO 40 � b � M b v R P A w �O M f f • N N M �r I f A b P M �!1 M A ® f f ^ ••� w •� s 8 8 8 8 O 8 8 8 8 8 O P w01 $ f A i O d1 N40 ♦ N .•n M A di P w� at N O M N N P N �+ I �O • A w1 A M O e/ �O b M tl1 P I P rw • .� w .w .� .� w .r w w .y N � N N N w 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 ; « g i f��f 8 OQ fps) OQ « . oQ /Ii! df I M v ♦ vpp M I P P 10 Af M M N I Y1 t wIi t :+ } .� A df b PO r' N N M A A A �O M • A w W A P N 0 N N N P A f « P PI wt N N 1�1 IA to N 10 �O Ifl N r1 A N M t ^ ~ ` L L aa L � 1 M QQ@ O •-� T 1A �O A CT � .� �o N N N N N N N N JAI m O O N N N m m N N N N O b O O O b b N N N N N N M T M M M T T ! f f f O O N N N N M a ~ .n • N b f f A A m N �n OA .w rt a� N O� N N • W 0 A M w N f w N b N ko • O� .+ '+� v� N b • ." M �'+ +'� N N N N M M T M rt 6 N J .r to C 8 8 2 g 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 g g Si 8 s 8 g p + b O Q .y N A • • T NM O A O �!1 b �f1 A f ! b • T .t S o • T �O ++ 1N o rt ��pp o M T 1fl • N O N T O� A f T A M ♦ .� • dl IDS • A O A b ! M N �+ O f O in to b A Q� A O • a, g aN w • • a® o -eq w • 0 0 •A 01 A N N P h N N �i�f1 A A f N P N A P Q� A N N Q N A h O AN A f in N O 77? N M O O� N �•pp }}CS�I A �fl Q1 �!f • • a� N A f f T • A �Np M �Q T 04 (Q. N .ter N ♦i1 �,T 1Q b A hpp pP�� 4W V4.®.r N N Trl fi�rr �qp J1 �O n ©WS h • ! M O Q� N M .Qi N N b J1 1fl .Ni b O �1 b M • O M O T • b f .r Ot N A A M T M O+ b b 1fl 0 O I-. ! A r N A • A O o R a, Q. �Ifdo •I � at ^ .r A b N N A M • �a P ! h h ! �a N �Q �+ f!1 T A O f • A N M T 40! ♦ �tl �O N M 1 �n A • Q� O� �+ .+ M o O p d1 O E O 8 Q O O O dY 1D M A �p �a J1 X11 ! a� N A A • �p A • T E O �t1 X71 � M �O N A ++ • �+f Uf Y# w► o N N w► r N oNp b A • �Qj a M �+ ! M rt ++ • M A rD d1 o T �+ w 1,! M I,1 h -► M f N T M • O b A N 1Q +� J! O ♦ M N �O • in 41 M i7 bb h M A ♦ ♦ • • i O w� �A A • r A T �fl b • A �+ •+ ••� .� w w� ..� w n� �+ .w .r rn m 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ` n • A �+ 1 r N n ^ C4 in A P • -P N N ♦ A A M� � ♦ ��p,1 A bb N ♦ N 1R N O h .y A N BOO 1,1 IM on TT .•+ Obi f at O on A w•1 A M A f A •!f f N wAi ! O .+ N1 A b a df O N � n a �+ N • A A A N N N N T T M M ♦ s.d ti N T M M ♦ ♦ ! x MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD T0: Library Board City Council FROM: Library Director SUBJECT: Monthly Report, December 1986 WCCLS: The ad hoc Structure and Governance Committee report, which recommends that the Washington County Cooperative Library Service (WCCLS) cooperative model (which requires special legislation) , was reviewed by Washington County Counsel. Counsel concluded that the model "needs more work" citing various problems with current legislation as well as constitutional questions. The Citizens Advisory Board (CAB), the ad hoc Committee and County Counsel will discuss this further but it appears that these delays will hamper the passage of new legislation to make this an option for restructuring the current WCCLS governance. The CAB will be recommending a 3-year operational levy for the March 31. 1987 ballot. The Capital Needs Committee has recommended that a consultant 'De hired to study the county--wide needs for expanded and new facilities. Automation: The "smart label" project being carried out on Mondays is progressing. Over 20 volunteers are coming in on Mondays and other days to support the conversion project. Nevertheless there will be a large number of ite=o left after the smart label project is finished. Tigard Public Library plans to on "on line" to the public the latter part of January or first of February. There will remain considerable data entry work on entering the collection as well as patron registration. Detection System_ : The detection system cabinetry has been completed. The insertion of metal strips in the books progresses, but slowly. Piano: A Baldwin baby grand piano, gift of the American Association of University Women (AAUW) to the citizens of Tigard, was placed in the library foyer. Volunteers: Sixtv-seven (67) volunteers worked 546.25 hours; daily average, 21 hours; staff time, 9 hours. This included a girl scout troop that gave 25.5 hours to the detection stripping project. Two (2) CE2 students worked =8.25 hours; daily average, 1_9 hours; staff time, 55 minutes. Four (4) community se rice assignees worked 27 hours; daily average, i hour; staff time 15 minutes. There was no library board meeting in December. Youth Services: Three programs were offered. "Choosing Books for Your Child," presented by proprietor of Ginger and Pickles book store, was excellent but poorly attended. 'Ornament Making and Tree Decorating" was well attended (75) and resulted in a nicely decorated Christmas tree in the library foyer. "Family Christmas at the Library" included stories of Christmas traditions around the world, cookies and carols sung around the new piano; 50 adults and children attended. Since adding the Library Assistant 111, another Toddler Titre has been added and made the special programming possible. Li Circulation of juvenile materials remains high (54% over December 1985) and the shelves in the 1-4 and Easy sections are always depleted. Personnel: Librarian submitted a request to City Council for a library assistant I to alleviate circulation increases and a reference librarian for 15 hours per week to enable adequate coverage of reference desk. Request was refused. 4� , t TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY - MONTHLY REPORT, DECEMBER 1986 - pa__ 2 Work Indicators December 1986 December 1985 Adult materials 6262 5216 Juvenile Materials 3332 2235 TOTAL 9594 7451 Days of Service 21 20 Average Daily Circulation 457 373 Hours of Service 190.5 186 Books Circulated per Hour 50.4 40 n Increase/Decrease Circ 29% +13% Reference/Readers' Advisory 123 264 Books in Use in library 706 630 Materials Added/Withdrawn 269/0 495/161 r Borrowers: New/Renewal 171/620=791 108/56164 Storytiae (# of sessions) 26 (1) 83 (6) Special Children's Programs 125 (2) 29 (2) WASHINGTON COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD AD HOC STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE s REPORT October 23, 1986 T RECOMMENDATION FOR LIBRARY COOPERATIVE MODEL REPORT OF COMMITTEE DELIBERATIONS WASHINGTON COUNTY CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD AD HOC STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Creation and formation of a Library District within Washington County through approval of intergovernmental agreements by participating jurisdictions. New governing board to consist of 12 members. representing 11 public libraries and Washington County New legislation required for proposed governing body 3 All libraries could be funded from the tax base. and could retain autonomy of staff, budget and operations - Capital needs for new outlets and expansion of outlets in both incorporated and unincorporated areas would be studied. various funding alternatives are available. Interim serial levy in the Spring of 1987 to fund libraries until tax base election in 1988 '�f r E 1 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD AD HOC STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF DELIBERATIONS AND EXPLANATION OF RECOMMENDATION I . Events Leading up to Need for the Committee The Washington County Cooperative Library Service (WCCLS) has been in existence since 1975, and during this period has grown into a system made up of seven city libraries and four community libraries. These libraries have been partially funded by four countywide levies. The cities presently fund from 452 to 752 of their libraries from their own property taxes , while the community libraries are wholly dependent on levies for operations. WCCLS has grown in the past eleven years. with circulation increasing from 440, 000 in 1915 to 1 . 464. 000 in 1986. The levy has grown from $262, 000 per year in 1976 to $2. 500, 000 per year in 1986. Most importantly. current library statistics indicate that library usage in Washington County is substantially below the statewide average. The statewide average circulation in 1985 was 8. 9 per capita. while Washington County's average was 4. 9, with the cities at 6.0 and the unincorporated areas at 4. 1 . Each of the cities has been able, through the availability of federal funds. local bonds or local fundraising. to build a new building during this period. Three community libraries were established in rented facilities and another moved into a new building. While WCCLS has been able to avoid major financial problems in this period, due to pass.ege of levies, it has come to the brink of rinancial disaster rn several occasions. In both 1984 and 1985 the first levies were defeated: these required second ballot measures . and both passed. However. if either second funding measure had failed, major curtailments and/or shutdowns would have occurred at each library almost immediately. In the last 11 years library operations in nearly every city in the county have been threatened by the failure of local tax measures. This "coming to the brink". and its demoralizing effect on the Public . library patrons, volunteers and staff. has led to the desire for a more stable system of funding for all libraries. During discuss io n with the Washington County Board of Commissioners when the second 1985 serial levy was approved for the ballot. the Commissioners asked the Citizens Advisory Board 2 (CAB) to study the structure and governance for libraries in the county, and to make recommendations for improvement. The Commissioners felt that they had the overall responsibility for libraries. as they approved levies for the ballot, but had little operating authority over them. The study request came as a desire to resolve this inconsistency. Reacting to the request from the Commissioners plus. the strong desire 'for stable funding . the CAB began to review available alternatives in the fall of 1985. A combined meeting with the . library directors. city managers and board members from several libraries was held in October. An informational meeting was held by the CAB and the Commissioners in October. Based on the tight time line required to get a tax base on the ballot in 1986, the CAB, in December 1985. recommended formation of a Special Library District. As expected . this recom— mendation was not favored by the cities. They would have lost some funding if they had not joined the district. and they were concerned about the loss of , their libraries ' autonomy if they did join the district. As a result of the views expressed by the cities. county staff recommended and the Board of Commissioners granted an extended review period in February. 1986. In March 1986, the Ad Hoc Structure and Governance Committee was formed within Washington County to continue to work on solutions to the library problems, and to find a solution which works for both city libraries and community libraries. II. Members of the Ad Hoc Structure and Governance Committee .Jim Johnson. Chairman Citizens Advisory Board .Debra Brodie Hillsboro Library Director .Ann Culbertson Citizens Advisory Board .Bob Davis • Assistant County Administrator .Susan Hardie Tualatin Library Director .Donna Selle WCCLS Coordinator .Mike Solomon Forest Grove City Manager _ .Dorothy Swanson Town Center Librarian 3 III. Outline of the Committee' s Deliberation Process The Committee met 18 times between April 11 and September 24 to: ,identify the goals of each of the 11 WCCLS member libraries .review the alternatives to structure and governance which might meet these goals . identify the "values" which best summarized these goals ,prepare a recommendation ,review source materials listed in Appendix II . review recommendation with library community IV. Description of the Deliberation Process The Committee made one major assumption at the beginning. and has held to it throughout the process: that all libraries would be included in the final organization. The Committee began by discussing the various alternatives for structure and governance which had been identified to this point: . Status Quo . representing the present organization , $ including WCCLS, CAB and combination of serial levy and city property tax funding . Soth Proposal , representing a combination of the Status Quo and a board based on the Cooperative Model .Cooperative Model . representing the type of government which is used by the Metropolitan Area Cable Commission (MACC) .County Service District. representing the organization used for capital projects such as sewers. lighting. etc. .Special Library District, as defined in Oregon Revised Statues .Tri —County Special Library District. as suggested in Dr. Martin' s report to Multnomah County After discussing how each alternative might operate. the Committee decided to ask each library to outline its goals for tP :+ future. so that the Committee was sure that it was fairly considering each member's wishes in the overall process. 4 This goal review process was helpful. as it focus on a combined set of goals for the entire ot thcountmittee to six goals. or Values as we called them, are as follows: y' These Single governing body .Stable funding . Local autonomy .Creation. funding and expansion of libraries .Cost effective cooperative services .Countywide access The Committee then analyzed each value. ne in Committee's opinion, each value should workoforfthe news library organization. The result was a complete set of values. included in Appendix I. which is V. New Library Organization Financing Considerations Assumptions: All present libraries would be part of the new . organization The funding of the new libray zaion through the new board could .incl ude ooat x tax dollars that sme orall are now being directed to libraries through both serial levies and city local property taxes. and would not preclude any agency from providing its own funding The Board of Commissioners would turn over the present WCCLS assets to the new organization. A level of funding would be created which would provide for new and/or expanded l ibraries. and which avoid the problem of cities subsidizing development of libraries in unincorporated areas -z i 5 VI. Conclusion The Ad Hoc Committee on Structure and Governance unanimously recommends to the Board of County Commissioners. the Citizens Advisory Board . public library directors. library boards. city officials that the Cooperative Library District. as defined herein , be supported and eventually established as the single governing organization for libraries in the county. The following steps would be required in the next 18 months to get this organization created. funded and operating: ° .ConsidF� -.ble work will be required to establish this type of governing body. mainly due to the need for legislation to provide for a non-directly elected body to be empowered to put tax measures on the ballot. 4 This requires support from the entire county library community in the next six months. .Draft the intergovernmental agreement under which it would operate. . Conduct a comprehensive capital needs analysis .After the legislation is effective. a ballot measure would be required to create the new organization`. November. 1987 or March 1988. .Following approval of the organization. another ballot measure is required to establish a tax base. May. 1988. Inherent in this timetable is the fact that it will. be necessary to have another serial levy on the ballot. since present funding expires in June. 1987. It is, clearly not possible to have the new organization in place before then as the proposed legislation cannot be effective before then and the next tax base election would be in May 88. The Committee suggests that another levy be placed on the ballot. The Committee believes that the Board of ¢ Commissioners should be in position to support the levy as a temporary measure. since a solution would be in progress. 6 s - e. The Committee suggests that the Cooperative Library District has the following pros and cons. Pros: Approaches single governing body Stable funding is assured for all public libraries in the county Local autonomy for city and community libraries is retained , and is defined in intergovernmental agreement which would be completed before the organization is formed There is provision for creating new service outlets or expanding existing libraries Maintains the very positive aspects of the present organization: nonfee countywide access and cost effective cooperative services Provides for long- range planning for future service outlets Cons: Passage of legislation to provide for non-directly elected board to be empowered to put tax measures on the ballot is not assured Public acceptance of tax base at adequate funding level is not assured Board size ( 12) may be unwieldy 7 C?. Apoend i x I AD HOC STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE DETAIL Of STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE VALUES VALUE: SINGLE GOVERNING BODY Librar Board composed of 12 members representing 11 public i raries and Washington ounty Method of Selection: Each city would select an elected official Each community library would select an elected member from the library' s Board of Directors One member would be from the Washington County Board of Commissioners Addition, of new members representing new service outlets would be provided for in the intergovernmental agreement establishing the district board Duties of Board: Y Board purview would be limited to those programs of service g operated by the district such as Test Slope. Books By Mail. Outreach. Courier etc. Staff Development, establishment and implementation of personnel system for countywide library agency staff Programs of service operated by district Approval of programs of service and circulation policies relating to those programs Approval of Materials Selection Policy including collection development. weeding, reconsideration of materials, and gifts and donations of materials Approval of public relations programs, displays and exhibits 1 �Y Development and implementation of Long Range Plan. including development of future service outlets Finance All financial responsibilities of a library district. including levying of taxes. budget approval , audit. etc. Setting of fees. fines and charges for countywide programs Approval of use oil district facilities Approval of acquisition and disposition of district property Approval of district contracts and agreements with other libraries and agencies Relationships to other libraries and existing boards New library board would be responsible for library , service in the unincorporated area of county. either by contracting or direct operation New library board would be responsible for approval of contracts with library service vendors Cooperative Users Committee would be advisory s to this. board; WI LI could be incorporated as a non— profit corporation Professional Board would be advisory to this board concerning budgets and program development Pros: Approaches single governing body concept Maintains local autonomy Addresses issue of tax monies being overseen by elected officials -r3 Cons: Will take special legislative action 'to revise library district law Board size may be unwieldy 2 i r VALUE: STABLE FUNDING Create a tax base for a erations and a fundingstructure to � prove a or ca eta nee s. Alternative funding mechanisms: Capital .Tax base for operations and bonds for cap ' needs. .Cities maY continue to fund part of their libraries' operations in addition to district funds. ital .One tax base tj cover both operating and cap needs for ale libraries in county. Pros: Long-term stable funding capital and operational needs de d Addresses both future liquidation of co ul d c ov er indebtedness and Meets simultaneously a goal of both and aD erational community libraries for capital funds Gets away from reliance on short-term levies urban conflict Resolves rural vs. dent on city Libraries would not be wholly depen funds Cons: Public acceptaisenot assured at adequate funding level Y VALUE: LOCAL AUTONOMY Retention of direct control by governingbodies of cities and community i raries in the fol-lowing areas: Budget Level of service (including hours) Personnel Materials selection Building Pros: Makes for better ability to respond to local conditions and desires Fosters greater community involvement Keeps faith with citizens who have spent time and money establishing the local library Maximizes salability of the cooperative library concept at the local level Retains accountability of local operation Provides potential for libraries to maintain local financial support and, therefore. control. Cons: Potential for decreased efficiency, particularly in collection development Potentially a more cumbersome decision—making process Varying service levels could result in interjurisdictional conflicts 4 VALUE: CREATION. FUNDING AND EXPANSION OF LIBRARIES New outlets for library services are needed as well as expanded acs lities torp-r—e-sent libraries in order to deliver equitable countywide library service Pros: More library services and materials would be available countywide to keep up with growing population Forces long range planning for library services. Alternatives for Ownership of Facilities: 1 . Cities could retain ownership of their existing facilities at time of formation of district. 2. County–owned WCCLS assets could be turned over to new district. 3. New or expanded facility in a city could be owned by the city. 4. New or expanded facility in unincorporated area could be owned by the district with reversionary interest to Washington County. 5. Unincorporated library in area annexed by city could be transferred to city ownership. 6. As an alternative. district could accept ownership of any facility. y. 5 � �•z 5`s..t.' �, "S's�w 4., _ :>k.. .a _ ....i+ -.ars �+` r: r . n VALUE: COST EFFECTIVE COOPERATIVE SERVICES Countywide services. both present and future. should be those w'_Fich fit the following criteria: Must be based on needs assessment Must be more cost effective if delivered in larger geographic area than by a single library Must be higher quality of service if delivered by larger k unit of service is Pros: Aictual programs are based on definite criteria Services are available to patrons of small libraries that otherwise are not available Provides a mechanism to access library resources from both inside and outside the county Provides a forum to address library issues from a collective perspective Cons: not all libraries always derive equal benefit Some programs are hard to tailor to meet the- needs of both small and large libraries x 6 VALUE: COUNTYWIDE ACCESS Nonfee access (without direct charge to patrons) to provide library patrons EST e a z it to borrow and return library materials at any library Pros: Political boundaries are not a barrier to library service and are transparent to users Nonfee access can be accomplished by varied funding mechanism ; reimbursement of net lenders . circulation, patron registrations or any variation or combination thereof Required for library patrons to use other library systems Required for acceptance of some grants Promotes library use t ic 7 Appendix II 1 SOURCE MATERIALS CONSULTED Martin. Lowell , A Development Plan for the Multnomah Count Library. April. 1986. League of Women Voters of Portland , Multnomah County Library System, April. 1986. Chadwick. Robert. Regional Library Report. March, 1986. Columbia Willamette Futures Forum, A Summary Report of the Regional Services Project: The Future of Our Libraries . Parks, and Transportation, January. 1986. Oregon State Library. Establ ishing a Library District: Legal Issues and Answers. May, 1996. Washington County. Staff Report - Washington County Cooperative Library Services Structure and Governance, January, 1986. Oregon Department of Justice . Draft Opinion Request OP-5997, August. 1986. Barney, Don and Associates, Executive Summary; Final Report of Multnomah County Commission on Library Policy and ministration. December, 13TS. �j g ar ."., „r..'* _.,•..:;x ........,,� .-m._.:.,... ..i vi exp-F...,i .Y ,.r. =.:.� f�,� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t AGENDA OF: January 12, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 3, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A Vacation Request - Portions of S.W. 67th Avenue and S.W. Atlanta Street PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City of Tigard POLICY ISSUE Council initiated Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30 INFORMATION SUMMARY This vacation is being requested by the City without objection of the owners of the adjoining Mercer Project for the following reasons: 1. Eliminates excess right-of-way on S.W. Atlanta Street, thus reducing public liability. Excess right-of--way was created as the result of recent State Highway Department improvements to S.W. Haines Street. 2. Reduces the right-of-way of S.W. 67th Avenue to current City standard, being 25 feet from the centerline. This, again reduces public liability. If the attached resolution is approved, the public hearing would be scheduled for 3/9/87. The City Recorder will mail notice to each property owner who would normally be required to sign a vacation petition. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolution calling for public hearing on 3/9/87. 2. Take no action at this time. FISCAL IMPACT 1. N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative #1. cw/4503A I■ I■■II■ .I■i ■t� ■ ■■ a/a :/JI! :IIlion INNIMM ■� F ■ 11 moi■ i1111G: i!'//lit � � !t■tl i! ■■ ..�■ ��+ 1 �11fIC 1!■� �I/11l ■■■ .ti■11 1/!1■ �'•• Cl11: ■1■n ■111■ !!!!■1 !/I! C ,'-moi '1� !!1111 .1/!lir �!llt: !!■!! 1:1�■ ■� ■ ,��i ■ : r r _. il■ ■ILI ■'1■:� _� ,_ �! !: _ © ■.- ■IIID oil m!■c ■r■;r�rr ■■Fri, r■ -..� �/ ,■■, � ■■. ■.■�tr.■r�� ■■■■ ■.��.: :.■rte - teal 10� r■ IN'0110 - -� '• ■ wool OR r �� - -� ■� �I Nails �%` ✓� �% , - S�� 11 r■� ■� r■ ■ � iii r�� � '- � .. .11111 ■r ;� � -' OF son -- Sim Ion visa mc I WE rm ■■` �/■///� �■ ■�■ d Vii►... �� � "'►,I� ` � /�/ ■�■ �■ ■� ■ _- ■■ter E- 1 ���� % ! ' fir■iii ■ �� moll CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 22, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW Walnut Place PREVIOUS ACTION: Tabled from 1/19/87 Parking Restriction Ordinances (2) to be heard 1/26/87 PREPARED BY: Engineering Division _ DEPT HEAD OK%l , TY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Adjacent Property Owners POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1.) The Council considered the attached proposed ordinances (2) at their previous meeting and requested modification, which has been done. 2.) The attached ordinances (2) propose modification of existing parking regulations along SW Walnut Place and the implementation of further restrictions. Certain adjacent property owners requested the modifications for traffic safety reasons. Most area property owners and tenants were given the opportunity to comment on the proposal and those who responded support staff's recommendation below. It should also be noted that the Police Department has reviewed the proposal and also supports its recommendations. 3. ) Both of the attached ordinances need to be enacted, or discarded, together; one impacts the other and both impact (modify) existing parking restriction ordinances now in effect along said street. The attached map(s) more clearly illustrates what is being proposed by implementation of the two ordinances. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. ) Do nothing to modify the existing parking restrictions along SW Walnut Place. This alternative is not recommended by staff. 2.) Modify the existing regulations, and the attached proposed ordinances, to prevent all parking along said street. This alternative is not recommended by staff. 3.) Pass both ordinances, modify existing "limited time" and "not at any time" parking restrictive areas. SUGGESTED ACTION 1.) PASS THE ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING SECTION 10.28.090 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A SUBSECTION THERETO, RELATED TO LIMITED TIME PARKING ON S.W. WALNUT PLACE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 2.) ALSO PASS THE ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING SECTION 10.28.130(49) OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PROHIBITED PARKING AT ANY TIME ON S.W. WALNUT PLACE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 2907P jh 4 ( W Z N � m O Q Cn a �• CM D0 1i 'Y N t Q U ,- Z N._ J O Z Y —� W to d � � •• �„ �' ` W LLJ • rd A F"ie N c rN o 0 Z LL� 0te O fA //_ •y �� ams __.., ji O a� l .v. ems' �� � `�•�� �N y L� ..•/ J � ti, �, P� L� W a 'lll1�j1�311 ar a JJe'. it JJ�JJJ v O •�; ;:\, N \; Ildlllli # � yr � i�"' \ �'�i7= ;+• � N �� IJJJI� lJfl� JJJJIJ j `' ',zl b �l1 IJJJI - 46, J OQ T =— ,y + '' r•.• \ IiJiJJJJJii�i• W . � Q JJJJJJJ z � \1� m °ter JJ�1�11 / D 4 cnLAJ r �� m tn z a 4 j p d LL wz En r n} O z J p w. � r a�J, % 0 N o W (n F N cr z 4 �. O Cj LL C1 0 tn ' r Ln r y� Z 41. lb in uj !b- Oil Q a Pr 0I11 �f I h `� y k iia Ao Lij yrs , v Ll �••� ���I�s h x,015, D0 0 \O 0. c IV O^ 0foa '�'� �1 st N �,� ej P ! D b CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 26, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Training _ PREVIOUS ACTION: Request — Street Survival PREPARED BY: Chief Lehr DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Chief Lehr POLICY ISSUE 1 t f f INFORMATION SUMMARY d Police Officers on a number of occasions are confronted with threat of physical and deadly force. This training prepares the Officer to be aware of threatening situations, so that he/she might avoid the confrontation or deal with it in a prepared and confident manner. Training will enhance Officers' safety awareness and provide skills to deal with confrontive and dangerous situations with least force necessary. Training is in Portland March 18th through March 20th, 1987. t i i ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED i 1. Approve the training request. a 2. Deny the request. i i m 1 FISCAL IMPACT i 1. $440.00 SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Staff recommends alternative #1. DCL:bsO516W t ,:: CITY OF TIFARD EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST s. This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: i- 6' Requested by: C-`_'7 ",�._�_ (�r`�yt;1A— Vendor No. : 1,��_ _ [J(j Employee request attend PAYABLE TO: ( `t s, -- [ j Employer required attend T. �,,�� For check run of Sulle 1642-7 • �� '•1 [ ) Mail check Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. :�„_ PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: ass:sass:sssssssasssssssssssssss=rassssassss:ss:=ssrssasssassassassmsssmsasrsas Title of Program: - Institution or organization Registration Deadline A n Training Dates From: 3-IF a? To: Describe the purpose: —,-,,;:r ✓s 2_ ;..., .i t_�t: t � . _r�C � K,!! ` L'sv►-,per. cvv 14 Is this related to current position [ ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: � 'U ;Q./tC re�litct��7+'L 4:A V i )ice. �. riT_i TRAINING COSTS:' [ ] to be advanced [ ) to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... /U- i146 Books.... ....• .............................. Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... Lodging......................................... Per Diem........................................ Other: Total $ !/o a=assess:sasmsa=az=sssmea:soa:asses=sssaes=as=asmaasaaa==amssman=oaamaas=assess Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures made on my behalf. _ Employee Signature: /' i C r r`�Y Date /- ?� s Appropriation 1 ceraZJIJS Manager: [X! approved [ ] disapproved D t. Head: [ "approved ( ] sapproved (explain): L Finance Director: llnissionet.d officers from ;.�:`;s`'- i= =�L;:'1 • • • • and Murt .County,Twp a�•` s;•;' .a,K :d dll •{e�rs.�c��r,iep��tions— us of of aU ♦. police, academy ± • and reserve off+cers•—�rec:rwis attending the Street Survival in Select the location II'" ~.•.:; ^ ---------------------- rr , FORM -------------------- REGISTRATION i o enroll, mail this form, with � i Northbrook. IL 60pg2.2727 Payment, to: Calibre Press, Inc„ Dept S, 666 D t .! For Immeiate credit card r Dundee Rd., Suite 1607 I registration, 1 i (except Illinois). 9 . phone: (312! 498-5680 or TOLL-FREE 1 1 1 TOL -800.323-0037 t 1 1 •Atlantic City,NJ—January 14-15/16 •Portland,OR—March 18-19/20 • 1 1 •Evansville, IN—January 21-22/23 • 1 1 Boston, MA— Minneapolis,MN—May 4-S/6 1 •Carson City,NV—February 11-12/13 • March 25-26/27 •Rochester, NY—May 27-28/29 1 1 •Atlanta,GA—March Lakewood,CO—April 7-819 • 1 r 1 March 13-14/15 •Kent,ON—April 27-28/29 Chicago, IL—June 13.14/15 i Please register me for the Street Survival It Seminar at •Universa!City,CA—June 24-25/26 1 _ 1 1 to my preference marked below. Enrollment not open to civilians.soap at>o t 1 Mae:Seaaee amreped a m,s"do mtmaw .according t tme+ a tar the"day.Jua dnd Dom. o for go t+nr wNdde e:etttw,s tEeemytr: , ro etwd the hY> aaorsm,as 1 1 Foal 3-D ya°'Iaee mer here t e!►i'ro�am 1 Lu Tbkd Donly ❑Officer S75)Rrg 2 Cap only 0 Day ) ` _— i O Officer Ism) t O Slxwse(S40) = s 1 - 1Total S 1 . ; 1 E"dilill"d is. ©Check or mors@ 1 O VGAY order made payable to Calibre Press, lnc. 1 0114'c* Acct. Number O Purchase Order#I 1 Please leave a Wank Ahem a space appears betweenExp.date: 1 Signature "`""°°`s on Yaw card. 1 Name 4/SC..-zLL ZzcjLao W 1 f Address . 9-5-.5 I :all W" Spouse Name 1 t 1 PO.Box NuMbW 1 1 2Still1 1 ' �22 3 Apr Numper ' dome Phone(Ania___)____�,�� 4 Asa 1 `°°" ode Dept. Phone(,S0 3) ZIP 1 Area Co ft A 1 Rank A�wcl�y.e 1 ! et Send me_ Agency S 1 extrabrochuret s to give to my fellow you rtm 1 «. r' Officers. also 1 r �Zly Pf10tOCOpy this form.) 1 + 5!Vrdcc& - ler de 1t'� i imedW to awned Joir, otWi tt bel Se 0 M a ts..!!4 1 ' t !dA �dolt de#s.EaM1 ;ratlret1a:tic►. t . 1 tldVitlsd 7 WN b•sped Mltlt' t 1 —a-..,... ,al'o<w t�atl4�tptn oorttMiilteto. dli09ti":. !� ,. t Aft arMy VaElonsa - t 1 CALIBRE PRESS 666 Dundee Rd .INC. 1 1 .,Suite 1607 stn tc RATE 1 1 Northbrook,IL 60062-2727 urs.POSTAGE 1 Please mark any :'•• a 1 corrections for your 1 ` •.r • ;. i in ding label and return i j t an envelope. r PLEASE INFORM YOUR TRAINING DIRECTORr t CITY OFTIC�,� tD► EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in you o nel filee.. DATE OF REQUEST: Q1 U$-��' Requested by: f/L���/ Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: CA - i� _icea,s,a J;;-�Employee request attend 4-o7- -S l t(e Duadge . ea.__� ( ] Employer required attend 41 a For check run of Natal ,2oc�K�rL• teoot ?� 7 ( J Mail check [ j Notify dept. when ready Vendor No.: Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: ssssssassammassssasssssassssssnssssssmsaa:ss:msssssaaaassasssssssssssaassssssssaa Title of Program: 1 - ' Institution or organization L S Registration Deadline Training Dates From 0,-3 ZZ—TO: -1,?A9,8 7 Describe the purpose: Is this related to (current position ( ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: 05 Ctscs,s/r3<,.. TRAINING COSTS: ( ] to be advanced [ j to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... go- 1 Books................... . ..... .....0....... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . Lodging—......o...................o.........o-- Per Diem........................................ Other: Total $ .Z ass=ssssaasssssas:saasasazaaaaaaasssa:aaaaaaaasaammamaaassmmassaaaaamasasammasammsaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/trainingpolici are no met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditur, ade o m e alf. Employee Signature: DateA/"'/ld'��� Appropriatio ncep 35'Manage (pQ approved ( ] disapproved D pt. Head: approved ( J sapproved (explain): { Finance Director: sskxwd officers from inty.Township State.C& 'f4,1 •• •1-.1 W fiN <_.•: • esecurity police•academy recruits a reserve officers—are •.iy �_ `!`�'-• • attendingthe SYWl Survival 1 `y+.�. -. ••'_ 11 Seminal:Select the locution " �� ���-y-•� i.t• •� fleafeSt you. ••••.'.�••, ,I ,fit• REGISTRATION FORM --------- ' To enroll, mail this form. with payment,to:Calibre Press, Inc., Dept. S. 666 Dundee Rd., Suite 1607, % Northbrook, IL 60062-2727. ' r' 1 For irrtrtnedlate credit card registration. phone: (312) 498-5680 or TOLL.-FREE 1-800-323-0037 � • (except Illinois). e Atlantic City,NJ—January 14-15/16 a Portland.OR—March 18-19!20 a Minneapolis.MN—May 4-5l6 e Evansville. IN—January 21-22/23 a Boston,MA—March 25-26/27 a Rochester.NY—May 27-28/29 s e Carson City,W—February 11-12/13 a Lakewood,CO—April 7.8/9 a Chicago,IL--Juste 13.14/15 ' e Atlanta,GA—March 1344/15 a Kent,OH—April 27-28/29 •Universal City,CA—June 24.25!26 1 Please register me for the Street Survival 11" Seminar at ! I x'00 �'' ~ ,according to my preference marked below.Enrollment not open to dvilians.except SOOMM ' ' 1 IIo1K t/aieM YMn1110 Y�I N not eiolaMrr kaw plapiMer kx tM MIM!ktlnlMo a align.EanpM Mea agtr aoYl k!MMM tM tr13�pn�ron4���asK kava � t WA Sol"say IN sr abs OW.JL41 d1Kk sr opsNPAW boat. r fell S-pq Pt"rsta Ofritlx('010O i95 - i fMt 2 Mp oo i75 O $65) t i TMrd Day Ody 0 Officer(S50) O SPoum(S40) s S t Total i 1 i Endowd is: p Check or money order made payable to Calibre Press, Inc. O Purchase Order# ' OM.C. Acct. Number Exp.date: [r� t 1 Plsass leas a blank when a space appears between nianbers an Vow card. ;•i. 1 Signature ^^�� Name M Y Q r2S 1 :!n/ A �++ Spouse Name Lem I i Address 13 1. 1 t?O. rkrrbw Sonat APL NuRlt r ~ t TI+Cn.a a2 cJ /Z�C'o '✓ `� 7..1..;1 3 - 4 t Home Phone ) N/A - Dept. Phone(-rLQ 3) _ 1 Rank ✓2 n eA 1 Agency I G f Bend rrte extra brochUMS to give to my WOW Orficere.(You may also photocopy this form.) i e CALIBRE PRESS,INC. u.s Posr t y 666 Dundee Rd.,Sue 1607 PAID . 1 Northbrook,IL 60062-2727 Pefrettt�9 I Please mark any ' corrections for your J•'s '• :a j mailing label and return l in an envektpe. ' PLEASE INFORM YOUR TRAINING DIRECTOR ABOUT THIS SEMINAR ' --------------------------------------------------------------- 7 CITYt3tr Tttr�4RD EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST [~ This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy Will be placed in your personel file. DATE OF REQUEST: /-IS-E37 Requested by: ,G .S�Djell Vendor No.: PAYABLE D �TO: �l,.r, Employee request attend r "[ � Employer required attend 4 O For check run of o �. TL Mail check [ j Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: _ - sswssssassass:sasssssssssssssssss:maasmcrsssaaaaaaaasassassssmsssssssssssssassss Title of Program: s of S "VA Institution or organization Registration Deadline _c Training Dates From: -/ - 7 To: - Describe the purpose:R�7�r 'v o44PLe rr/(pFOP)" Is this related to .0/1 current position [ J reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS:* [ j to be advanced [ J to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition. 0o Books.................... ...................... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . Lodging......................................... Per Diem........................................ Other: vu - Total assns=sssssassss:sssasasaaaae=s:ssssaasosssasaasasaaassaasasssassasassssssassass - Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the _ City for any expenditures made on my behalf. Employee Signature: � Date 41 Appropriation ce:a6 Z 35 Manager: V<1 approved [ J disapproved t. Head: [ approved [ J isapproved (explain): L`r O!2 r L o u Finance Director: officers from Sts!•.County.To nShiP •.'.7p`� a and Munan i*d 3caofry descdO seclurity poke.academy NMAS •�'A•�• �.• .• 0 e and nmww officWS-800Street attending the Sqn-dw Select•l,� •.�:,'i,• 'n j/•)_. • the dation i .,� •N?-• = nearest you ••!"w _• " .. •�- _:.. REGISTRATION FORM -------------------- r-------mail this form.with payment to:Calibre Press. Inc., Dept- S.666 Dundee Rd.. Suite 1607. To enroll, 2.with Warlhbroalc, il. credit card registration, phone: (312) 498.5680 or TOIL.-FREE 1-600-323-0037 3 ' i For intmedlate 9 (except Illinois). r MN—Ma 4-5/6 • ...., ti ; •Atlantic City,NJ--January 14-15/16 a Portland,OR—Match 18-19120 •M'ni Y —May 27-28/29 o Evansville, IN—January 21-22/23 o Boston.MA—March 25-26/27 •Rochester,Mf - ' •LakewoodCO—April 7-8/9 •Chicago,it-,June 13-14/15 '• 1 •Carson City, NV--February 11-12/13 •° ' 13-14/15 •Kent,Oif— ril 27-28!29 o Universal City.CA—June 24-25/26 i . 1 o Atlanta.GA—March � - r Please register ma for the wrest survival 11" Samiaal'at ' i � G ' ,according 1 Enrollment not Mans • sa.s _ r preference �iew r apafllathti . w � .iaawarrwls�.rt .�•cww �r 1 •,• ... , �: ss ar pna nsdalr s eMleaea.banwr� � 1 ser swi1N aaAr IN so as ft.jug dwo sw an OFeboom - �q_DO Officer 10 Q soom � YM officer(S50) spom(W ❑ �fes) __ r TOW 1 to Calitxe Press, ft. ❑Purchase Order# i 1 Endoew+: Q Check or money order made Payable r-r-r-rT1 • . ifl YiBA Exp.data: fl M.C. Acct Number 1 Please wnwe a tdank www a apnea sppaars between nsrdws on You►entre. 1 Signature rZ/'C Spouse Name _ Name—. Lam Kira aaetaa rwnr iAddress vo.een N10100sewn _ APL ween 272.2 .3m Coen Horne Phones ) N/A Dept. Phone y 3��"--Z�• .�is� :`•. '.;, ; Ana Code Aroa Gods Agency • •t i g«W rrte ' extra brochures to ghre to MY fellow offioera.(You may also photocopy tftia form.) ad .: •-• ; <Nte016•• �j l ln' o0raon-._ .i _ _ CALIBRE PRESS,INC. PAID •� r866 Dundee Rd.,Suite 1607 Noreibroale,IL rNortitwook,IL 60062-2727 Parrrdt No me 1 Please mark any corrections for your ''i .•::.: ;`•'��.. :. 1 mailing label and return in an envelope. PLEASE INFORM YOUR TRAINING DIRECTOR ABOUT THIS SEMINAR • L--------------------------------------------------------------- CITYOFTIFARD EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: (J/- 0'I- S 7 Requested by: t! iy+ e r r i// Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: b r e d'r�ss. .✓C .- Employee request attend D g-r.�, 1146 n ifNd e e Rd-� [ j Employer required attend 5 a ,ta7 A�err�b�s/�r L For check run of 01 a- 27,z7 [ j Mail check ( Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: s:ssssssassssssssasssassss:asssassasssssssssasssscssssaassssasesssssssassassss: Title of Program: S-rree r a r vi Institution or organization CA14re firer r b'1>5jr lerriF/��! kegistration Deadline Training Dates From: 03-er-F7 To: 0-7- 2, -F7,�K Describe the purpose: 7uct«Jr rrAiNliv� 'F- on, rA1rsC_r ft e J( r-rlCe CdA'J / y. 21 - / -rAItf ya Fe ea 5e s Ca jprtraX,1vj G7r � Scf"-,V N.- R ll rriTi C41 �A/4ise o7- a � S f/CWJjieA1t1 1* 1'e lY lla✓.•�.- Is this related to (�11 current position (/J j reasonable promotion or tfansf r? Explain.: a rTre-ef, PITA/ �.r <<� ./ire of/icet� , r��Pc,a!(y. ��; tt�/ -- g_71r_$� is a ScAe tiled d.,I. ♦rr ire P - 2 .prrPil a IMtitri A' , T `� T� r /�Yf� a �of�G�offli0✓/ Ci/'!: `► ��P,v �6iv,/v SAT-- -��--i'(-�� JC X 0 4w/!W AJ �l of 1� N/ Ort r-7,ire i..r:,// is P Nr.�r✓r�. TRAINING COSTS: to be advanced [ j to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... /d-/!.7Q— j9.29,'dt) /x.06 Books*.......................................... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... Lodging......................................... i✓ Per Diem........................................ / Other: �+ Total $ _Z /0. 00 ass:a:sasszasssaaaaaasaaaaaaaaasaaaaassasssass::saassa::aasasassaaaaass:assssaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures made on my behalf. Employee Signature: ew,// f Appropriatio Vance: 3 r Manager: [X approves ( j disapproved De t. Head: ( approved [ j isapproved (explain): s "tc C Finance Director: 1 Commissioned officers from Federal,State,County,Township o and Municipal agencies of all • a i descriptions—plus military security police,academy recruits and reserve officers—are attending the Street Survival II'" Seminar.Select the location nearest you. -----------------REGISTRATION FORM --------------------, i I 1 To enroll, mail this form, with payment, to: Calibre Press, Inc., Dept. S, 666 Dundee Rd., Suite 1607, 1 Northbrook, IL 60062-2727. 1 I r TOLL-FREE 1-800-323-0037 For immediate credit card registration, phone: (312) 498-5680 o I (except Illinois). 1 1 l is Atlantic City, NJ—January 14-15/16 C e Portland,OR—March 18-19/20_ i e Minneapolis,MN—May 4-5/6 1 I e Evansville, IN—January 21-22/23 • Boston, MA—March 25 26/27 a Rochester,NY—May 27-28129 i e Carson City, NV—February 11-12/13 a Lakewood,CO—April 7-8/9 is Chicago, IL—June 13-14/15 e Atlanta,GA—March 13-14/15 a Kent, OH—April 27-28/29 is Universal City,CA—June 24-25/26 i 11 I Please register me for the Street Survival if'" Seminar at according i to my preference marked below. Enrollment not open to civilians, except spouses. 1 1 NWe SOouses a termed on ening do not nen.,anty have to reg stet for Me Same schedule aS of ren; Enample-You may wish to attend the full 34ry program.DW your WOUSC may have ; W"sm We only ter the ourd day Just CWk the��tlicer tat110M 1 1 1 1 Full 3-Dint Program ❑Spouse($95) = S Rist 2 Days Only Cl Spouse(S65) = $ 1 1 1 Third Day Only O Officer(S50) ❑Spouse(S40) = $ 1 Total S 1 1 i err+os.o ❑Check or money order made payable to Calibre Press, Inc. ❑Purchase Order# 1 j ❑VISA Exp.date: 1 ❑M.c Accl. Number 1 I 1 Please leave a blank where a space appears between numbers on your card. 1 1 I 1 1 Signature I 1I Name ! ; F r r 'i f# / Spouse Name j 14 At,e 1 Last Fust Middle Inial 1I 1 Address • 2 -7 7 p Po box Nun*w Street APLNwnher 1 1 /,I ,,'Aril Dreg , �7 _,' � I N QdY /— 5140 Zip coder 1 � I Home Phone( Sa,, ) cf a - 3/1 3 Dept. Phone asci Code) l ' /X Aree Code I i Rank 4uh t"(* r Agency 7 i I'd /'l 1, c e Qlee T- 1 1 Send me extra brochures to give to my fellow officers. (You may also photocopy this form.) 1 1 1 . .r-*...-r..ter.-.._.�...,....•�+ r-.,+.er-.-r- -eve!t...r�t•�---^...•+c,sC+e, f ^" ,. ." 1 1 YNIENT LOCATION LOI)GINf351,.. 1 Seminarfefee is payable by check, Each Sominar 1s presorted in'a oondort Special d�soolaMs!>�i y bdpN18 f>ave 1 ktor"order,oredlt card or department able ciassroom atmosphere,with•good been arranged tlof$e1il ler attendees at i purdhase order U.S. funds only. Re- visibility and sound for the many vlsusls:c"a0 locatioils.:Datars vrpl be sent with 1 1 hinds must be applied for In writing at and demonstrations.The exact aft for :your registraAlon conflirmadlon- Marty 1 I least 2 weeks before Seminar date.Ear- your Seminar will be specified wfth officers combine Seminar attendance 1 1 y►egiatrstion advised. your registration confkmatiorl. with family vacations. 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 BULK RATE CALIBRE PRESS,INC. u.s.p POSTAGE I 666 Dundee Rd.,Suite 1607 1 1 Northbrook,IL 60052-2727 1 Please mark any 1 corrections for your i mailing label and return 1 1 in an envelope. 1 I i 1 I 1 i PLEASE INFORM YOUR TRAINING DIRECTOR ABOUT THIS SEMINAR ; --------------------------------------------------------------- TI NE'1N -GENERAOR T1�1 - OF STREET SURVIVAL ago— MINAR: 198'1 .. - r • Aflandc Cita NJ-Jaouw 14-15/16 ' . EvanWft, W—JanmY 21-22/23 • Orson Citi MV-Febrwry 11:12/13 , r -AUsub BA--March 1344/15 • Portia d IM—Mamb 18:19/2D -March 25-28/27 Win; MA N., —March ! • 1:alcerod, CO—April 7-8/9 - ` KeK — 27-28128 • Mi es�poi , MN_Mary 4-5/8 y. • R NY--May 27-28129 . Cpicsgb, -,fie 13-unci - o _ Edbld to Tow atloodam*at < . Ordosi a Expe'n,Via,Wig s Plus owe W 1-800.32$.M0 TM FW(Olfc*¢t - w(M2)498-56x0 Fork Ja:fsat_Co Credit Card ROseryatkas wo r L The Tactica/Ed e I nTM 9' SemInc7l, err�r� r X �5 n i- Choose a 32orlday program Calibre Press Street a Seminar,the most popular train- : ' The pro tory of law enforcement, hasundergone - , inp program in the HistoryIr " •>>':��J..It�r.j';.Z• major revislons to update and expand its content. •'" ',_ � Now for the first time.a flexible format lets you select the number of training days that fit your schedule. Y ca hensive 3-day pMgram ' attend the rminpre • a You can attend the first 2 days 001Y f • -; —or- 4k�• You can attend the third day on{y. • • • � Your spouse can also rimose depending on time availability. You'N see dramatic NEW VISUALS. valuable NEW TACTICAL IN- r FORMATION and unique NEW AUDIENCE-PARTICIPATION DEMON- i STRATIONS.This new program Is called: �. rs over the 3-day period.Days 1&2 .x It combines 2 different semina cera called The Aeiical Edo"Swhwt,with emphasis on survival tactics and use of force. Day 3 is called The wU" Seminaf.and focuses on preparing for and surmr{ng a Critical incident psycho' logical{y and legally. You can enroll in either one—or both.at a savings. Either way, you'q experience the realism, usefulness, entertain- ' of presentation you've come to " ' - • . ment,dedication and high-quality P expect from the Street Survival•program. • ,,.seas, l UPDATE YOUR TRAINING CEKTIFICATION. . . Ila semYar ii aneNad to aadN toward rrs«vio.Tra�ino n aaa.atals Kanea.Kanuicb. ••rreerasla f ow. NOM oaloon.oft(MM oars.onoon.7M.urn.varmo d.wommoa,ane wronrno• seminar eueralanot appNa taa,ra aarrt+o "10r>,rtenn,aae«advanced lewd oatlriutloe irc Alaln,Amaral.Moaan.llawaa.New Me".Noon r�rowa war vlrola.(&"=apOeeeorr r«ago reprredl. oldahoee.TN.rsaa and vlrorrs- Aeandaroa is ardoraaeand aarNNdion car lr oM anger artan dram ire ldelw.MaryWrd. • ANerJlion Ualdbp for SemNr arYndanoe Is arINtlN Nt Florida and Arizona.when Iran 0 g revaaras pa". ilaaraN,MdWa.kR%%Misaori.New llrrpddrs.Sone StM8 dW&Wda a0onty vm piw antlRrala in of WS P Nle.M submNted.N:Colaade.6eorpia. f. t1NN pR06n11M 11111 e®1 TK NXMNAL Ai>;0CUM OF MN OrMIM OF LW OFOnEMR IRAN 1 1• 1 e The seminar runs from 8.00 S.M. to 5:15 ndout books . Registration! et dgin tape o5 vides - Note-taking materials and a new special hs at 71a ~_ _ •' recording permitted.A commemorative patch and certificate will be given each attendee. r• - •+• Copies book The Tactical Edge: Surviving High-Rick Pafrnl, will be available at • e the new special reduced nate. A select number of other survival produts will also be discounted. • discount 00 normal coach flights to most seminars.Ask for details. content taigiveyou the edge ever � DAYS 1 & 2: The Tactical Edge Seminar The first two da s of the new Street Survival II"' program fit together as a cohesive trainin unit. The emphasis is on survival tactics for high-risk patrol and on the proper seiectian, delivery and justification of once. Besides content that r builds on the Tactical Edge book, many new areas that relate to officer vulnerability are explored. Fast, aa.arate ' decision-making and the development of tactical options for controlling violent offenders to protect yourself and your partners from life-threatening assault are common themes throughout.Highlights include: Contact/Cover a new concept in officer protection...tacti- anger assessment how to read"predictable threatening cat reconstructions of tragic armed confrontations ...the behavior" in suspects ... what "resistive tension" tells key ingredients of asurvival-oriented response to violent Oyou about threat potential ... assessing danger from tat- situations...psychological and physical considerations in posi- Koos...using your body language to de-escalate incidents...a tioning suspects during field interrogations. new look at Yes/Maybe/No People ... special considerations - with emotionally disturbed or drugged subjects. ' uilding searches:how to assess your risks of entering... ments of attack ... understand- using Tactical Thinking to guide your movements inside ontrol principles:the ele B...decision-making that avoids blind movement...evalu- ing the Danger Zones—and your"Reactionary Gap" ation of surveillance/security techniques ...coping with special positioning your hands for the fastest responses ... how problem areas...what to do with located suspects...defeating c to your adversary and for the "audience" ... ung attack dogs...working with K-9. uaiance and breath control work for you and against the suspect ... what tactics work and don't work against bigger assailants Tactieal brainstorming:how you can devise winning strata Weapon retention. gees on your own ... how to screen new tactics you hear about for strengths and weaknesses—before you stake orce: new ways to select the right force option ... over- your life on them ...vehicle stops—is what's new realty better coming the dangerous threat of under-reaction...what the ...field testing theory vs.reality. Flatest court decisions mean to you ... how to educate a jury about the realities of force ...the secrets of justifying your ursuits: a different kind of "barricade" problem ... to decisions in reports and testimony...special considerations for Pchase or not to chase ... little-known emergency driving officers with limited force options. techniques that can keep you alive ... critiques of actual that • incidents ... keeping your vehicle stop tactical and safe when C ouetermeasums:at last—physical control measures the chase ends ... new legal risks to you from the offender's work ... "blitzes" and stunning techniques even small driving. officers can master easily ... how a female partner can deliver surprising and devastating physical force ... bar fight rdremists:today's newest threats that are nearest you ... applications ... what works best against drugged attackers ... Etactical defeating booby traps in biker clubhouses, drug labs and handcuffing. survivalist quarters...the growing alliance between prison gangs and paramilitary fanatics ... the latest in disguised and urvival shooting:evaluating offender weapons—and your the Winning Mind-set ... Crisis Rehearsal—the improvised weapons ... where domestic terrorists fit into the own ... international picture. Spractice that gives you the edge under stress in a gunfight new techniques for getting the most from your handgun and wife threats our risks from therowing influx of"knife shotgun when your life is on the line ... targeting alternatives .• cultures" ...edged weapon awareness .your response when "center mass" doesn't work ... how to keep "officer Koptions evaluated—baton,gun,empty hands...the des- down"from becoming"officer dead." E peration disarming move that works if you can't use your firearm And much mole... a new threat—the ballistic knife. r - - : • • � � inn ___,�,. HOW 1 enders violent Ient off DAY 3: The Witt" S��rz�i:Dar OPttonai Day:� is a natural a(7rttt,vn to Oat's i anf7 71 ±1 n stand all c as. e tri,ru! un;; PIC toc �r± pp1nG taagt(af and Icgi1 aspe�tl, ut �>urvfvin4 a t r�'•;c:3i Inpdiak Ertl; rrttir3n'e ittighlq,htµ n JudFr b a('t for p' p Survival Resource t neww I !jr(,; till u l'i ±rlg Ib Mi't!I) y(?n d11vt ihr r you tion t KIMA you 11,10' thr et' b t !;f r !.' . sttengih if: ',h r;;'. and te•,tr w'u•i lh+ u(Jrl �g;lnst you antastes vs realities 1,1vil, dt,• ;:1 .., :. Fifilubw'A ytY: u[ t h•,. r�r 'J_± a ;t tlnnn n,iinri ,uf(t,i !i:a Cf� ;re< i ",,, _ it'd' ,.e liar d .hu 1 'ur h n' r tt_.iU:iyr 1.1,rl ,r c'r r N X t ,_ . . � u• r .. , ' �orhabte solutions ui r ji ,rq l I ' d �" ,lr• rr � rr, nrgr.I ,k e., u �Iabllliy r t ; 1 Courtroom (raps ' � +^r, � . • r fIR",`.iii;... .�, ,, "n' •. ,_, ,t i::•r ... lr.! h�,, r . COU'' inning n .r f : I n etiectiv('(a'(�;• rr'i,±z±? , tt f: ., ,e yuo nor t,±:, !ylr�i'. -:.±I;it•m,n� Y,� t(�11itIQ Yr rti �.h!tlihd� ..t i t.f,t y,,�, ��; rr tfi,gh t`Urti rt''. lf•�'. tt.it:M y:yl� REGISTER - - YOUR INSTRUCTORS Rsaa�bsry t�arsoe Charles Remsberg and Dennis Anderson are co- founders of the Street Survival*Seminar.Remsberg is author of the popular text:Street Survival:Tactics for Armed Encounters,and the new best-seller,The Tactical Edge:Surviving High-Risk Patrol.Anderson is the award-winning producer/director of training films, including Survival Shooting Techniques and the new Deadly Force Decisions. Together they've trained more than 35,000 officers and have been responsible for saving scores of officer lives. + Sergeant Gary Klugiewiez of the Milwaukee County (WI) Sheriff's Depart- ment joins the team for Day 2. During 10 years as a line officer. super- visor and defensive tac- tics instructor, Klugie- wicz has earned an in- ,, temational reputation for developing practical,re- alistic new tactics for safely controlling dan- gerous suspects. s +a- i Lewinski Powers Day 3 instructors include Bill Lewinsid and Tim Powers.Lewinski has 18 years'experience as a law enforcement psychologist. His hands-on insights about post-incident trauma have helped numerous officers and their families overcome Critical Incident "afterbum." Powers is founder of the Fibres Insti- tute for Police, fire and Rescue. An authority on peak physical performance,he has developed"Tac- tic Aerobics,"combining fitness training with prac- tical self-defense. (inched m em be swoumW wow seem ie apege�eies.) F CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY x AGENDA OF: Januar 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 26, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Training PREVIOUS ACTION: Request Command College _ PREPARED BY: Chief Lehr DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Chief Lehr POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The FBI and the Washington State Center for Criminal Justice Training hosts an annual 7-day seminar for law enforcement executives of agencies with fewer than 50 sworn officers. It is modeled after the Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar for Chiefs, in departments of over 50 sworn personnel, held at the FBI Academy. I have been invited by the F"BI to attend this years' seminar, March 14 through March 20, 1987. ALTERNATIVES COiNSIDERED 1. Approve the request. 2. Deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT 1. $382.00 2. -0- SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Staff recommends approval of alternative #1. DCL:bs05O7W e C11YOFOR�A EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your pe sonnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: 1 2fajS? Requested by: ) of C. LGlnr Vendor No. : _ PAYABLE TO: 4C. ` ei. [ NJ Employee request attend Mta .A [ J Employer required attend For check run of ( J Mail check (yeJ Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: sssasasssssssasssaaasaasassassasasaassassaaassasasasassssas:sssasssssssssssasas Title of Program: /VmrU cs Institution or organization Registration Deadline Train ng Dates From: .tie !•!• To: 240, 1 87 Describe the purpose: F!r Is this related to ( • current position. ( ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: to be advanced ( ] to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition.................... .... . /ot 1116-bZS:Oa Books.. ...e..e, bus, t........................ ain, a ...... , et .. . Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . Ji5.t1 to-(.24;op �- Lodging................... ......... ........... . . 10 / Per Diem.................. ..................... . Other: Total $ o ssaaaaaxsssaasaaaaao=o.eaaaaaa=aaasaaaacaacaaaaoaaa=aaaa=aaaaaea=aaaaaaaaaascma Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures made on my behalf. Employee Signature: Date Appropriation a ce4/CZ)-C)0 - Manager: [ j approved [ ] disapproved Dept. Head: [ approved [ ] disapproved (explain): azze Of Finance Director: _'• •.\•• � 'L�,' ••�• •jam• _.}• � .-•. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS ice- ,••Z•i ?'�-~ :: +�4.,+s°a,'ri Y�• •ts `.s�'% '�: .. j t;�*-_, ,�� :,�• ��;:fit-�l.�• ' ?:�rI'�'�,:�. .�r ... ;,_,' The course material for the Command College will �( 'w= • .•s•.��'i±;,;2.�."`.".%'s'-rti'k"'•� ,t�"S,.•�• '°i`� . »�' "'v �~ •: yj `�;; r : ».. •. ': be patterned after course material in the Law Enforcement Executive and Development Seminar • ' •;. ' - (LEEDS) held at the F.B.I. Academy. However, attendance at LEEDS is limited to agencies with 50 or more sworn personnel. The Northwest Command • College will target but not be limited to) managers • from agencies with between 10 and 50 swum • _• personnel. A total of twenty participants will be • selected from Washington State with ten additional • - participants drawn from throughout the region. A 7. committee consisting of representatives from the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, • the Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission • and the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be • • responsible for selecting participants based on their - - submitted application. ' APPLICATION FOR : •• ' - NORTHWEST COMMAND COLLEGE ` Complete both sides of this application Last Name Rist Middle L HR David Christian Home Address 8630 SW H—amlet ct, City State Zip • Tigard OR 97224 Home Phone It Birth Date SSM (503) 639-9012 5-20-43 305-44-2866 _ - Name of Agency/Department TIGARD POLICE DEM. Agency/Department Address Phone N 13125 sW Hall Bl.city Istate(503) 639-6168 Tigard Ott lzi97223 •S.� _a'••:"1• s..•'•• ••' x.t :: � •.`�� •�i x .. •'+.•.. •••�•� 1. , ,_ .��. _ a :• .:=`: ' _�' -` : :,:-: :: :_':i-`:. ; CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS '` �j='•"" ;�-�''> '`� �_�� ", The course material for the Command College will '•=- .� �j�.�^ ���•�='�•�Ji' 'i�I'1..� _ 'G'MM•� rte• � ��;: ;?' ; ; - <•; be patterned after course material in the Law • :�' '=="� •"""• •"' Enforcement Executive and .:. _ :• -"` Development Seminar • - _ - (LEEDS) held at the F.B.I. Academy. However, - attendance at LEEDS is limited to agencies with 50 or more swum personnel. The Northwest Command College will target (but not be limited to) managers • •• from agencies with between 10 and 50 sworn • . ' - personnel. A total of twenty participants will be - selected from Washington State with ten additional participants drawn from throughout the region. A committee consisting of representatives from the •. .. Washington Association of Sheriffs and Pblice Chiefs, • the Washington Criminal justice Training Commission ' and the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be • responsible for selecting participants based on their ' . submitted application. • ' - APPLICATION FOR • - - NORTHWEST COMMAND COLLEGE • Complete both sides of this application • last Name Fast Middle ` LEHR David Christian _ Home Address 8630 SW Hamlet Ct. city state zip Tigard CR 97224 Home Phone* Birth Date SSN (503) 639-9012 5-20-43 305-44-2866 - Name of Agency/Department ", -•' - _ TIC;AI2D POLIO DEPT. •. t Agency/Department Address Phone# r , • 13125 SW Hall Bl. 1(503) 639-6168 city •' - Tigard I State zip Cltt 97223 w . - • '3� '���. - •r(-• - Pte:�••• �J _ .a_Li.. .����' •.�• •'1� 'y•r •'1••w�>`•'!=`_�.a•��� .�. �(..�.♦.w�!�� y.J.a ,�f1. L.;e•� ���1:r•� •♦t.rt._,.� t�.:.>: �. j- � •,�« .ti.. ••i•,• ?.�S�*�.. •r 4.•:•:• .�,..ra�� •-.• d�•�r�!4i�(.t.4�+ :/�J.��.f`fes 7w t•�t�".d s:�l� .af+r•'..L`t.•• ��.� fr.�t.,�?�•.'YrS'-��♦ .�f``.��:+�.,,�'-••�.J�.•:.'I•••N�:? .yy ••� /tY-,•S'- tf� �'^N�l.�rY�Jrr,:y:fa�`•A'i�.Zi��l�' -•�-ti aY'�.w'�i: v ••.,i:��.•.....i.i..:.♦.s1aa�:1�....�i3f�o:r1�.►s iso Announdag •' • . The Second Annual - Northwest - Law Enforcement a Exewuve Command college Cb-*onsared By \.L , CRDAML Washington association Washington State a . of Sheriffs and Criminal Justice Police Chiefs Training Commission Federal Bureau of Investigation ILI` �t • t t.t - •� SIS•I� �_ _,_�t = a .�• - •.f• •i. • ';.�•.y •'� :a. :•• .e•'!♦: �t,'.S' .•!• •1�•�•'�. .t' �•. a g I � � Lri .., t E m W " � rz � m U C C O to Vf �' Ocr N v a a O t Z► LL W F- > C ` a C Q 'coo s > Q- >_ > v_ Q 2 -J a �c 3o `�' Y3 of a D `�L, a U x 00 x b, c 0 roc V 4 a ea M 'O L MW cn C W O Q'p 0.J'O eo C eo N V p ^pp ..� c ts► a - p 1- 'c, v c a w oo— O O ev Ci «:I- .� E r � m�•- m Tv Q CCC i� '� > ? C o as Z r o w W >- u u ?• V, c eotZ n ' < � 53 w oiz a,c V of Cp v LU t� o o � �. ao Z �, W � - B _'Scu .� JS3ZC_ G. t/� w � � p - J � F- u� LL'SQ� �'u`o c Z 00 1N F 3 M- W W '� C W c - E a Q ° a a. c D_oE a 3u ffi V- c0 � a ac r m c sa. 3 mu M'. n v, � c � � c ►- u a p ax" > E 3 � 3 $ a •E .r .N �� aQ m V � E! a s LU t '—° Q a r g-a 9 3 u V a o C c ;; ate, '-> .� � c caoccQt M ° O 8,°Lv eco �� Ea � a �Loai-c� � u4E+ eo �oc > °' Umcs ESE°.�' VW ac, 2 c � a � �c� 1% E �- � E >' c2i° a VVc— .. WV E c"a " � e�ac ,' �' oco � Esa v m� � � aE � ' Y � X W u-•ao_ a s u � , E -Y -0Z $`` uva c ams E � � c C W J c o &oayL CL ^ oao'c a bc�= 0 Q u v Q QN> 0Cn cg E ` c w Qro L' 3� eo m 3 „+ u 3 t%1 _ Q m _ c V � � > p W c g O rJ W efl C 00 e'^o C O C 0! C a a ` m _- C m m O to '�_ C a V E ro 3- � ca ,o .. �a � a p � m � � �s E •- � �_+ Ec � Ea �i° �i a�so" � Vin cctvc W aQEc_ -�- wm cLio 'E -j c � - a; a cEQ W W Z �,°a u - �+°o-ra.c r-.2., V a� o �� _� p m S.Q�C u s �-r Z `° c� pa-. c y-voO' X 41— ,5-0 o v V N V eco O 'O C eo 2 oaD = �. L m O a _ M Z c 10 0 oo �c �i oo'- o 0 E c eo � '° o �° �_ � 0-0 -- u � Q aeo ..>_, � cacc . or- co',,, aa �. � 3 ayc, � .r-a ooc 2 E � E° E � uc.- = c ca � o t�� a � 'c � QZQ FcE �+ oao0 �' ' acieua oaf Q � �s aao °' ro �� caci tb.� � t° ZW �� Uaxi � aDouaxia °eoo[�.�.r- 6 U. QQVQ �'a reV �'c7i •. _ �'moi. _ �:R.•-''•r: ` -.f:'.. - :�. y�., . "� j � •"=Z Z, c.'�. i' ..• •' 1"t1r :t .r " ... +ice'. ��. �`� -i.'•�'r'�,"'C'rI y`iYv CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 26, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 26, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Training PREVIOUS ACTION: Request — Tact' al Supervision of Critical Inci6btk PREPARED BY: Chief Lehr DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Chief Lehr POLICY ISSUE TY INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard Police Department is required to respond to a number of critical incidents, requiring competent supervision of the incident. In the last several months the Tigard Police Department has responded to hostage situations, robberies, and barricaded persons. This school will enhance the skills of Department Supervisors in supervising such incidents. Training will be held February 12th through February 13th. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the request. 2. Deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT 1. $399.00 2. -0- SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Staff recommends alternative #1. f DCL:b30507W xa r•- { EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST ' This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: i- O,3-ja'7 Requested by: MggT�nS Vendor No.: PAYABLE TO:�1%" ,t- IMA9,7-,r [XJ Employee request attend ZZ6A.214- ( j Employer required attend For check run of [ j Mail check ( J Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: sasssssssssssssssassssa:sassssaaasasaasaaassaaaasssasaaassssssssssssssassssssas Title of Program: DAM -COZ `' / mgj2 Institution or organization Registration Deadline ---Ata 15 Training Dates rom:Q2- I �St�o: OZ- 13•S7 Describe the purpose: Supe4,Vlc6�j ,IKC1 C P—Pjaymenc+ CluriN C/-, f��-�-', (3CCA.*-a,yXCeS 1.F p . 1�-Obbe-ry 5 HoS+rAje- jj to a,+10YLZ XVXa Is this related to [XI current position [ j reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: [X] to be advanced [ J to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition.................. ....... r Books........................................... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . Lodging....................... ................ .. to-f/�a- t�rtae 0 Per Diem..................... ................ ... .0-//zn -Uy!*a Other: Total aaaasaaaa==aassaassaasaaaaaaaasaasesaaaosos=scacaaaae=aaaaasasaasaaaaaasossaaaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures made on my behalf. Employee Signature: Date /- R• a'7 Appropriation be: 3S Manager: [ � approved [ j disapproved D t. Head: ( approved [ J sapproved (explain): S%r u a Finance Director: a _• '•• is •' - .. _ ,. .• 'r;J.�•• •,a�•.a.'•:^•:•�• -,•' '' �„-� •.�'• s ..• :•r"_.• .. .•�•� f. '•".�.r ^w. �:�.• S a�j`:s Y• ••�.•• - ♦ ti-:11 .Y.-. ..,:. -..- �L.S.•-Zr.►fr�'.J_.�:�+'�-'. •�� � •'P�• _wZ•,A.`s-wi.�. •Lim.: .; ��?? i.Er ,8a24•�lat 21/�"�/87 1��F (45?g1 Aca OVE'GON " .►-� R ^T,^t SE^ �0 :'N:'JQ��J.... IT BILL S 0. SOP ='MTON unLICF DFP!!=T r i IS c ^„-r:; n• ;��.._.•^� •c -TACTICAL croto;�IaTO.. t"I;ISL I':CJ^: �.c :-•��? C��-_,_- ...�.. ;. :o :. - r:r f r- :” vsL ]2_ AJ 13TA. .:. p, I I�'^L''*F: �.,_ ^- "SI1�taSJ!i:'aIC�^� SUB- CiS . r.I�ID SIA;: ' fid:, ..35 i!"L "_'A^.TICAL SCOUTIN%- TO VI'.+L ?z GELD I!^�Z Qr?JFi�I'mti�•�r? C� A�yAt!"� ?E�Ig'IR ,T30, I. �P E�top.:.- ?'hT. p?ICE 1S Sic P AT^�r -�,:• (_. _ � ^�5-?51�. , i0 ���?ai. L . `.• �T+.?IrrT' COO"TA ''_' V - ,+nw 0"'COSS w SI: l'p n'Ti^'!:s�T , :. _ "'' ��•�• r•c c!;•�R1i: �1 :OV=?l.'-T l�ij F. z O. %: 0 Pp nn '.�(��' L-CDVT�t; i7CAU SFnVICL' PVAILA3L_ SOloA -� 51.51: h F �y C Srtk - - ..• �'•t..T'6... y "ice;''_ , _ CITY QF TIG%, RD f_. EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: /f/H/g 7 Requested by: Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: ._.GS2lZCdT (7('j Employee request attend -- T.rtsg., ( j Employer required attend For check run of ( j Mail check [ j Notify dept. when ready Vendor No.: Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: PAYABLE TO: asacssasasasssssasssmmss:sas:s::assssssacrossaasasmaasmasasasmasassssssms:aasssa: Title of Program: of s Institution or organization _ Registration Deadline _/-/5-d' 7 Training Dates Frow,�1, 0&2&7 Describe the purpose: sec N��-veol•ae-� Rv.vo.t.�cstlae.•r% Is this related to [DQ current position [ j reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: 4S ra leoc. ►�,u�'s:e.✓ P co.,,.......•k.x .% .o�•, /.�sj9,r:.s.�(p .k, t���•,-�a1 .w a1 SKpevay.•se c ��Fie�J iwcr�r..rs w.�ti 5c.wr� FKPyUe.Ie`' as Gutlf has R.Q.`c� /�coN^�• TRAINING COSTS:* (Dd to be advanced [ j to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition........................ . Books......................................... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)... . Lodging......................................... /..fy'aa /,b6 Per Diem........................................ 7b 4 wd Other: Total $ a==azaas=saasasaasaaaaaaasaaasaaa=aaa=a=oaa=aaurasoaaecavc=aaaaaaaa=oaaa=amaasaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expend' es mad on behalf. Employee Signa re: Date y Appropriation b ceanager: ( approved [ j disapproved D t. Head: ( appro3ved [ j isapproved (explain): P_C Finance Director: «� �• .J.<' -.. gas A''�.+-....4'+�i��r i - 'ti'�� .a. IN ;,�, T,Ln JR32.4:.115Y ?1/-" /f?7 1 4► (15. •. qry �FEGON ' a . •. .err ^r i� Df1LIC� DFPA=T"''r'IT IS FLIf"r T� *JC''mIfi vILL�S?OPIS0P !�, „ .jICT�•! �^ c :.I TraL I'.CI"... _ ^'„,-n•1Q ��• TACTICAL GT�pTi-'D ' ` r ..•t^ , ��► h:ti�' _' I.:af . r--;.*' T3FY =J�- ..-. .,. r T �� , ;.AID IAS^L'�"Y i S t�STP.R7L. SI1ltErTu1�SS . AA✓•TCP- JLJa C1 T ATTICAL SCOUTI ;+i= ec•• ►:�?. •a ?- _ELD I:: FNTOr- CeFC� Tom. ? ,T rF•+ T�•TO I: ,F rru ATm�r'�TE. AD"-At< E ,,_$ Z' I'' rnr^ T%k P'lICE IS Si ,T a) ^�7—?:,lc , ;;) ISi-� • `JI r. �. +, A cal IN gDVANCE OF 0.i -vos" D3SI::.11;G ^ �y. r'Fr !.I r'_ SI C _ .. . .•+ TIS S 4T%r 1 S �sQV d'Z.f.. TP 7 •_ Tl ±� SFRVICE P_VAILA�L- C� C hCO �L,-� L. 0r� ^ T (.1?T 4• T0"r _