Loading...
City Council Packet - 01/14/1987 r - TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate a BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, JANUARY 14, 1987, Noon ask to be recognised by the Chair at the start ' TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 12 Noon 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 12:05 2. SBCOND PUBLIC HEARING-ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 8-86 ALBBRTSONS INC. The Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 regarding the Albertsons Annexation Proposal. One issue frequently addressed on that date was that receipt of the hearing notice was delayed through the heavy holiday sail. In order to ensure that all interested parties have received notice and had a chance to testify, the Tigard City Council has called this Council hearing. A request by the City of Tigard to forward an annexation proposal consisting of 19.04 acres to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. Also, to assign the Development Area designation and to change the coning on the property as follows: Washington County City of Tigard Tax Map zsl Tax'sZRoni+ Zonto 2Sl 15A 2800, 2802, 2900 40 3000, 3001, 3002 R 24 R 25 The property is located on the east side of Pacific Highway and south of Durham Road and west of SW 113th Ave. 16120 SW Pacific Highway, 16270 SW Pacific Highway, 16265 SW 113th, 11430 SW Durham, 11480 SW Durban, and 11400 SW Durban (WCTM 2S1 15DA Tax Lots 200, 300, and 400; and 2S1 15A Tax Lot 2800, 2802, 2900, 3000, 3001, and 3002.) o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Director o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponenta, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Director o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration Ey Council 3. SECOND HEARING-ZONE CHALICE AMMUTION ZCA 20-86 SOUTH METEGER NECi The Tigard City Council received testimony on December 29, 1986 from interested parties regarding the South Metzger Annexation Proposal. One issue frequently addressed was that receipt of the hearing notice was delayed through the heavy holiday sail. In order to ensure that all Interested parties have received notice and had a chance to testify, the Tigard City Council has called this Council hearing. A request by the City of Tigard to forward an annexation proposal to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. The area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progreas Community Pian zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. The property is located on the east side of Highway 217, i south of Hall Blvd., Locust and Spruce Streets, i went of the Multnomah County Line, i north of Highway 99W and Pfaffle Street. (WCTM 1S1 26C Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 401, 402, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1401, 1403, 1700, 1900; WCTM 1S1 26DB Lot 1300; WCTM 1S1 26DC Lots 900, 901, 902, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3301, 3302, 3500, 3600, 3700, 3701, 4100, 4200, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4601, 4602, 4700, 4701, 4800, 4801, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5101; WCTM 1S1 35BA Lots 100, 101, 4 COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 14, 1987 - PAGE 1 v - 1802; WCTM 1S1 35AC Lots 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300; WCTM 1S1 35BD 100; WCTM IS1 35AB Lots, 100, 202, 203, 204, 400, 500, 501, 600, 700, 701, 702, 800, 801, 900, 901,1000, �" 1002, 1003, 1004, 2800, 2901, 3200, 3201, 3202, 3203, 3205, 3300, 3301, 3302, 3303, 3304, 3400, 3401, 3402, 3403, 3404, 3500, 3600; WCTM 1S1 35AD Lots 900, 901, 1000, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1705, 1706, 1800, 1801, 1900, .2000, 2001, 2100, 2101, 2200, 2300, 2301, 2302, 2303, 2401, 2402, 2403, 2404, 2405, 2500, 2501, 2502, 2503, 2504, 2505, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200; WCTM 1Sl 35AA Lots 401, 500, 590, 600, 800, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1200, 1301, 1400, 1900, 1901, 2000, 2500, 2600, 2700. 3600, 3700, 3701, 3702, 3703, 3704, 3705, 3800, 3900, 3901, 3902, 4000, 4100, 4101, 4200, 90000, 90001, 90002, 90003, 90004, 90005. 90006. 90007, 90008, 90009, 90010; WCTM 1S1 35DA 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2202, 2300, 2400, 2401; WCTM 1S1 36CC Lots 300, 400, WCTM 1Sl, 36CB 100, 200, 202, 203, 204, 205 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 300, 301, 400, 401, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 700, 701, 790, 890, 900, 1000, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1100. 1800, 1900, 2000 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2600, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200. 3300, 3400. 3500, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900, 4000. 4100, 4200. 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200. 5300, 5400. 5500, 5600, 5700, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6200, 6300, 6400, 6500, 6600. 6700, 6800, 6900, 7000, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7400, 7500, 7600, 7700, 7800, 7900, 8000, 8100, 8200, 8300, 8400, 8500, 8600, 8700. 8800, 8900, 9000, 9100, 9200, 9300, 9400, 9500, 9600; WCTM 1S1 36CA Lots 100, 1600. 1601, 1700, 1800 2100, 2201, 2202, 2203, 2204, 2205, 2206, 2207, 2208, 2209, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2700 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3301, 3500, 3600, 3700. 3800, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4201, 4300, 4400. 4500, 4600, 4700, 5600, 5700, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6900, 7000. 7100; WCTM 1S1 36DB Lots 600, 700, 800. 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900. 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300; WCTM 1S1 36AD Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 500. 501, 600, 601, 602, 603, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 4000, 4001, 4100. 4400, 4500, 4600. 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200, 5300, 5400, 5500. 5600, 5700; WCTM 1S1 36AA Lots 2200, 2201; WCTM 1S1 36AC Lots 3800, 3801, 3900.) 0 Public Rearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Director o Public Testimanyt Proponents, Opponents, Cross B=amination o Recotendation By Community Development Director 0 Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed 0 Consideration By Council 4. ADJOURNMENT 1w14486A COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 14, 1987 - PAGE 2 lei T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 1987 — 12:05 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Tom Brian; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards (left at 12:23 PM), Valerie Johnson (joined meeting telephonically at 12:20 PM), and John Schwartz; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Jill Monley, Community Services Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Ken Elliott, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, City Recorder. 2. SECON3�iUSLIC HEARING—ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 8-86 ALBERTSON'S INC. N=O #6 The Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 regarding the Albertson's Annexation Proposal. One issue frequently addressed on that date was that receipt of the hearing notice was delayed through the heavy holiday mail. In order to ensure that all interested parties have received notice and had a chance to testify, the Tigard City Council has called this Council hearing. A request by the City of Tigard to forward an annexation proposal consisting of 19.04 acres to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. Also, to assign the Development Area designation and to change the zoning on the property as fellows: Washington County City of Tigard Tax Map Tax Lots Zoning Zoning 2S1 158A 200, 300, 400 R 25+ R 40 2S1 15A 2800, 2802, 2900 3000, 3001, 3002 R 24 R 25 The property is located on the east side of Pr.eific Highway and south of Durham Road and west of SW 113th Ave. 16120 SW Pacific Highway, 16270 SW Pacific Highway, 16265 SW 113th, 11430 SW Durham, 11480 SW Durham, and 11400 SW Durham (WCTM 2S1 158A Tax Lots 200, 300, and 400; and 2S1 15A Tax Lot 2800, 2802, 2900, 3000, 3001, and 3002.) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Councilor Eadon declared a conflict of interest on this agenda item and, therefore, did not participate in Council discussion nor vote on the issue. C. Community Development Director summarized request history. He noted that the item was for reaffirmation by Council on their intent to forward to the Boundary Commission a zone change annexation of the Albertson's property at the corner of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. He advised that the annexation issue was the only issue to be considered. The zoning had been dealt with by Council through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He stated the NPOs' are studying the issue of upzoning other property in the community to offset the zoning displacement of residential units that occurred from the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. There have been no changes to the annexation proposal as presented at the December 29, 1986 Public Hearing. Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 141 1987 The Community Development Director further indicated that the request was brought back before Council due to concerns raised regarding the heavy holiday mail slowing down the receipt of hearing notice in December. d. Public Testimony Proponents o John Shonkwiler, 5750 S. W. Carman Drive, Lake Oswego, represented Albertson's. He requested, on behalf of the interests of Albertson's'and all of the individual lots within the annexation area, that the City grant the proposal. Mr. Shonkwiler noted the Annexation was within the urban growth boundary and the Comprehensive Plan called for the area to be annexed. He concluded by noting annexation would aid Tigard in obtaining more control of Durham Road. Opponents o Dave Atkinson, 10460 S.W. Century Oak Drive, Tigard, Oregon, testified he did not object to the annexation but to the zoning issue which was intermingled with the annexation issue. Mr. Atkinson was very concerned with the possibility of Durham Road being expanded to four or five lanes. He cautioned City Council that the residents of Summerfield do not want Durham Road to be expanded. Mayor Brian commented that, as far as he knew, the Council was 100% supportive of the Comprehensive Pian which defines Durham Road as a two—lane street with a third lane for turning. o Eunice Day, 15940 S.W. Oak Meadow Lane, Tigard, Oregon, supported Mr. Atkinson's comments. She reiterated that the residents in Summer— field want to keep the road from being any wider than three lanes, with one of the lanes being a turning lane. Ms. Day also commented that she would want truck traffic eliminated along the road in order to protract their community. Q. City Administrator commented on the testimony concerning Durham Road by stating jurisdiction of the road could transfer to the City. However, the annexation proposal itself does not affect any of the Comprehensive Plan elements as far as land use or transportation. f. Community Development Director reported City Staff recommended the annexation for Albertson's be forwarded to the Boundary Commission with a favorable recommendation. g. Public Hearing Closed h. RESOLUTION 87-09 A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE INITIATION OF ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED (ALBERTSON'S INC. ZCA 8-86). i. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to approve Resolution No. 87-09 with full concurrence of the public testimony that Durham Road remain as the City has indicated to the residents of Summerfield. Page 2 COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 1987 Councilor Schwartz stated he was Council in discussion followed. as a two-lane road with a R or Brian noted the concurring Council support favor of Durham Road mayor third turn lane. for the Comprehensive Plan with regard to Durham Road Councilor Eadon Motion passed by a 3__0_1 vote of Council present; abstained. SOUTH METZGER SECOND PUBLIC HEARING-ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 2x"86 1986 from 3 . SE on December 29, NPO 02 & 4 Council received testimony Proposal. The Tigard City the South Metzger Annexation interested parties regarding t of the hearing notice One issue frequently addressed was that In order to ensure that was delayed through the heavy holiday chance to all interested parties have received 1 has called until hearing. the Tigard City council proposal to the City of Tigard to forward an annexation Commission. A request by litan Area Local Government Boundary the Portland Metropo 1 Code. The The area to be annexed will be designated he eTigard an bpa shed area an conformance with Chapter 18'Pian°f zoning and comprehensive p of -Procrens Community the Washington County Board Metzgertions by and subsequent designations as adopted 279, and 280, of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278,lied. The City will assign City amendments thereto) will be app conformance with the Tigard planning and zoning designations in s. The Tigard Municipal Cade and Oregon Revised Statute 178q&ls�uthtof Hall property is locatod on the east side of west y the Multnomah County Blvd. , Locust and Spruce Streets, WCTM 1301, 1302, Line, & north of Highway 99W and Pfaffle Street. (1300, iS1 1, 3 s 40, 401, 402, 1107, 1108, 1109, 10. 200, 300, WCTM 1S1 2608 Lot 130: WCTM 1S1 26DC 1700, 1900; 104, 1005, 1006, 3100, 1303, 1401, 1403, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003' 4100, 4200, 440, Lots 900, 901, 902, 350, 3600, 3700, 3701, 510, 3200, 3300, 3301, 3302, 480, 4801. 490, 5000, 4500, 4600, 4601• 4602, 470, 4101, WCTM 1S1 35AC Lots 2900, 00 1S1 358A Lots 10, 35010,.183 00, 390, 400. 410, 420, 5101; WCTM 320, 330, 340. 40, 300, 310• 1S1 35AD Lots 100, 202, 203102. 1003, 430% WCTM 1S1 3580 100; WCTM 3201, 3202, 3203, 3205, 3300, 3301, 3302, 50, 501. b00, 700, 701, 702, 800 801, goo, 0, 901,1 , 2901, 320, 360% WCTM iSl 701, 1004' 280. 3401, 3402, 3403, 3404, 350, 3303, 3304, 340• 1301, 1302, 1303, 170 , Lots 900, 901, 100, 110. 1101, 1102, 003, 1800, 1801, 1900, 2000. 2001' 2100, 2101, 2500, 1702, 1703, 1705, 1706, 310, 320: 2404, 240 , 220, 230, 2301, 2302, 2303, 2401, 280. 290, 300, 2505, 2700, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 2501, 2502, 2503, 2504, 590. 60, 80, WCTM ISI 35AA Lots 401, 500• 101, 1002, 110, 1101, 1102, 905, 1000, 3700, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 200, 250, 2600• 2700' 3600, 410, 120, 1301, 140, 190, 3901, 3902, 400, 380, 390, 90006 9007, 3701, 3702. 3703, 90001 390002, 90003. 9004, 9000, 500, 600, 70, 4101, 4200, 900 9008, 90009, 9010; WCTM 1S1 g5DA 100, 200, 30240, 2401; WCTM iSi 80, 900 190• 2000, 210, 2200, 2202, 230, 36CB 10. 200• 202• 203, 204, 205 206, 36CC Lots 30, 400: WCTM 1S1, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 217, 213 214, 215, 226, 227 228, 229, 30, 301, 400,401' 500, 1300, 1400, 150, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, , 501, 502, 503, 504. 1700,90, 72 10 72/089220�� 1 2300, 2400, 250. 260, 1600, 1700, 1800, Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1987 .m 16 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3700, 5500, 5600, 5700, 5800, 5900, 38AA, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300, A400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200, 5300, 5400, 6800, 6900, 7100, 6000, 6100, 6200, 7400, 7500, 7606300, 6400, 0, 7700, 7800 6600, 1, 7900, 8000, 8100, 7100, 7200, 7300, 8800 8900, 9000, 9100, 9200, 8700, , 8200, 8300, 8400, 8500, 8600, 1600, 1601, 1700, 9300, 9400, 9500, 9600; WCTM 1S1 36CA Lots 100, 2207, 2208, 2209, 1800 2100, 2201, 2202, 2203, 2204, 2205, 2206, 3207, 200, 3301, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2700 2800, 2900, 3000, 4201, 4300, 4400, 4500, 3500, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900, AOQO, 4100, 6900, 7000, 7100; 4600, 4700, 5600, 5700, 5800, 5900, b000, 6100. WCTM 1S1 36DO Lots 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200. 1300, 1400, 2200, 2300; WCTM 1S! 36AD 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900' 2000, 2100, 602, 603, 700, 800, 900, 601, Lots 1000 200, 300, 400, 500, 501, 600.4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000. 1000, 4000, 4001, 4100, 4400, 4500, glOO, 5200, 5300, 5400, 5500, 5600, 5700% WCTM 1S1 36AA Lots 2200, 2201; WCTM 1S1 36AC Lots 3800, 3801, 3900.) COUNCILOR JOHNSON JOINED THE MEETING TELEPHONICALLY: 12:20 PM a, Public Hearing Opened is agenda b, Councilor Edwards declared a crticipate inlict Of the nterest for h the discussion or vote. item and stating he would not pa COUNCILOR EDWARDS LEFT THE MEETING: 12:23 PM G. Community Development Director summarized the SouthMering on tzger Annexation. He noted this was a second schedulededified, however, issue with the Planning Staff's report not being rty is included. He the zone designation to be placed on igarde planning and zoning stated the City would assign City l Code and Oregon designations in conformance with the Tigard Municity ipal Director Revised Statutes requirements. COsignations nor recommending advised staff was not changing any changes from residential to commercial at this time. d, City Administrator reported to the Council that the Planning Report did not change and all of the testimony d, for tithe priorhearing tha was part of the current hearing. il Staff Report had been addended fitaddenda dealt with servicesal included in the to packet dated January 8, 1987) boundary along Spruce the area and suggested to Council the northerly Street be reconsidered. all from e. City Recorder noted, for the record, that Staff received a laceme� ofclanguage the Boundary Commission on 1/13/87 requesting p to clarify the originally submitted legal description. Staff had responded to the Commission's request and clarifying language was Council's included as a resolution for then No.u861140 would dnot tchange. ionShe further stated the map from Resolution g with the f, Community Services Director rep ortd she had service-delivery cocerns Police and Streets Departments in the area. SheSeapropos te response to public testimony ns for Council consideration diat based on Staff r uncil hearing. These alternatives were: the 12/29/86 Co Page A - COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 1987 - Option A: The area as originally approved on 12/29/86 by Council. Option B: The area as approved on 12/29/86 with the deletion of lots along the south side of SW Spruce Street between Hall Blvd. and 71th Avenue. This was based on comments received during testimony from citizens regarding the unimproved portions of S.W. Spruce Street in that area and staff service-delivery concern. Option C: The area as approved on 12/29/86 with the northeast boundary of the proposed annexation being moved south to the Precinct #192 line. This was based on comments received during testimony from citizens regarding the failure of the vote in Precinct 027 at the 11/4/86 election. The line would follow the precinct line and cuts through the middle of several properties which would create some servic"elivery concerns. The Community Services Director also reported there was an update to the resolution forms Council originally received in the official packet for Options A, 8, and C. She stated additional language was added to note the clarification language which was added to the legal description at the request of the Boundary Commission. g. City Administrator added, for the record, that the amended packet in the possession of the Councilors had the legal descriptions for the alternatives in addition to the amended resolution as reported by the City Recorder. h. Public Testimony Proponents o Cynthia Iford, 9970 S.W. Greenburg Road (in the proposed annexation area), testified that she was in favor of the annexation of Tigard and deferred further comments to her son, Reid Iford. o Reid Iford, testified that he lived in Metzger outside of the proposed annexation area. He commented that his son attended Metzger Grade School, in the annexation area, and would like to see sidewalk and paths in the school area and see the school receive the benefits of being within Tigard. He further testified to the strong support for annexation given by the area in the last election. Mr. Iford further stated Washington Square would use City services and enumerated those services. Mr. Iford asked that the record show he would personally circulate a petition for the proposal to be put to a vote. He °\ asked that the Council "vote for a . vote" by forwarding a favorable recommendation to the Boundary Commission. o Thelma Martin, 7119 Taylors Ferry, Tigard, Oregon, testified that she owns property in the area at 9450 S.W. Coral. Mrs. Martin stated that she is in favor of annexation with a note that Mr. Iford covered all of her points. Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1987 f 1 o Pearl M. Blom9ren, 9460 S.W. Oak Street, signed in as a proponent for the issue but did not wish to speak. 4 o Bonnie Lillian Drinkard, 9520 S.W. Coral (in the proposed annexation area) testified that she was in favor of annexation. o John Blomgren, 9460 S.W. Oak Street, (in the proposed annexation area) testified that he was for annexation. He advised Council that originally he opposed piecemal annexation but realized the total area denied annexation in November. He cited the need for City services including police protection and street improvements. Mr. Blomgren commented that when Washington Square opened in 1974, Metzger lost its identity as a small community. o Kathleen Coffeen, 11216 S.W. 81st Street, (in the proposed annexation area) testified that she was in favor of annexation with the hope that Pfaffle would be improved with sidewalks and better access onto Hall Boulevard. Increased police protection was also cited as a reason for her favoring the proposal. o Ray Coffeen, 11216 S.W. gist Street (in the proposed annexation area) testified that he concurs with Mrs. Coffeen's testimony. o Sheila Kasten, 9885 S.W. Ventura Court, Tigard (out of the proposed area) testified that she lived within the Metzger Elementary School District. She wished to see the area annexed so that the school would receive the benefits offered to schools within the city limits of Tigard. She expressed concern for the lack of quick response to child abuse cases in the area. o Marjorie Haglund, 11075 S.W. Hall Boulevard (in the proposed annexation area) testified she favored annexation. Her comments centered on traffic concerns and the need for improvements. Ms. Haglund said residents south of Spruce Street sent their children to schools within the Tigard area and, therefore, related more to Tigard than to Metzger. o Clara Haeffle, 10900 S.W. Hall Boulevard annexation.(in the proposed annexation area), testified that she supported o Leila Whitford, 11070 S.W. Hall Boulevard (in the proposed annexation area) signed as a proponent on the issue but did not wish to testify. Opponents o Paul A. Herberholz, 8400 S. W. Pfaffle (in the proposed annexation area) testified he opposed the annexation proposal. He said the police and streets were adequate and expressed concern about the inability of many to afford any improvements if annexed to the City of Tigard. Mr. Herberholz referred to the November election results noting the annexation proposal for the whole Metzger area was voted down. Mr. Herberholz presented a petition with 65 signatures of persons against the annexation proposal. Mayor Brian noted that the petition is not an original document, but the copy would be accepted into the public record. Page 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 1987 v - o Frances Baynham, 10495 S.W. 71st (out of the proposed annexation area) testified she opposed annexation. She cited the November election results voting down the annexation of the whole Metzger area. Ms . Baynham said she liked the area without street lights and other improvements; the community had all of the services needed. She commented on some recent street improvement work done by Washington County and added that the County had future plans for additional work. Ms. Baynham referred to the CPO 4 Plan approved through Washington County and commented that she worked then for the community to stay as it is. Ms. Baynham objected to annexation in a piecemeal fashion. o Janet Thompson, 10151 S.W. Jefferson, (in the proposed annexation area) testified that she did not prefer to go into the Tigard area because the change would mean "double the cost." She expressed concern that once annexed, the services would not be provided. Ms. Thompson referred to the November election results wherein the annexation of the whole Metzger area was voted down. o Harry Luberto, 8080 S.W. Spruce (in the proposed annexation area) did not wish to speak, but indicated he opposed annexation. o Doris Underwood (no address given) stated she was out of the proposed annexation area on the north side of Spruce Street and did not wish to speak indicating opposition to annexation. o Delores Luberto, 8080 S.W. Spruce, (in the proposed annexation area) testified she was very opposed to Spruce Street going into Tigard. Mayor Brian ascertained that Ms. Luberto's property was on the south side of Spruce in the area which would be removed from the annexation proposal if Option B were recommended by Council. She indicated she could support Option B. o Arlie R. Ott, 8500 S.W. Spruce, (in the proposed annexation area) testified he was opposed to the annexation. He cited the recent elect results wherein the annexation proposal on Metzger was voted down. Mr. Ott stated Tigard had nothing to offer. o Mary Anderegg, 8512 S.W. Spruce (in the proposed annexation area) did not wish to speak but indicated she was in opposition to the annexation. Ms. Anderegg said Option B would be better as it would remove her from the annexation area. o Pat Whiting, 8122 S.W. Spruce (in the proposed annexation area) testified that she was representing herself and her husband. Ms. Whiting had several letters to enter into the record: 1. Roy Collins, 10565 S.W. 71st; although out of the area, he was within the CPO 4 area which is affected by the proposed annexation. Ms. Whiting reported he was diametrically 6 opposed to the annexation. A, 2. Karen Larson, 8311 S.W. Spruce; addressed concerned about service duplication and did not want Spruce Street entered into the annexation. Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 1987 3. Dale Williamson, 8311 S.W. Spruce Street, was opposed to the annexation in total and, specifically, opposed the inclusion of Spruce Street. Mrs. Whiting referred to the CPO plan which addressed the need for zoning areas to allow for higher density and for commercialization. She stated she was not opposed to change, growth, or making room for others. She noted a city must take on a different kind of philosophy for the maintenance of its growth and its administration. She advised Council a reason citizens opposed the annexation was that they do not want to be part of a formal city structure and that they already have a plan which was adopted by the County through the guidelines of LCDC. Ms. Whiting said she was concerned about the quality of growth. The drainage situation was also of concern to Ms. Whiting who did not want a formal, cement covered type of drainage program. She advised the natural runoff now supplies growth of greenery. Mayor Brian asked if Ms. Whiting preferred any option discussed. Ms. Whiting explained that due to tho Spruce configuration, service delivery would be difficult. She concluded by saying ". .one of the alternatives, other than A, possibly should be considered." o Ray Baldwin, 11655 S.W. Pacific Highway, opposed the annexation. He did not support piecemeal annexation and stated the proposal should be presented again as one parcel to the entire Metzger community for a vote. o Steven Herd, 8085 S.W. Spruce Street (out of the proposed annexation area), opposed annexation. He cited the recent negative election results regarding annexation in the area. He commented that it appeared there was not a great deal of thought on the part of the City because of the presentation of the three options. o Sharon Herd, 8085 S.W. Spruce Street (out of the proposed annexation area) did not wish to testify other than to have the record show her opposition to annexation. o Jay Waldron, an attorney representing Washington Square interests, 1211 S.W. Fifth Avenue, questioned and commented as follows: 1. Referred to the Staff Report as clarified by the City Administrator and asked for the opportunity to address it at a future hearing. He requested a copy of the addended Staff Report dated January 8th. t. The City Administrator stated a copy would be provided for the s Washington Square representatives. 2. Mr. Waldron said he presumed the City would have a future public hearing since the three options presented by staff were not part of the public notice. page 8 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 1987 3. Mr. Waldron requested the source of figures referenced in the 12/29/86 hearing (he mentioned $174 and $113). He commented Beaverton was using different figures and requested an explanation of the difference. 4. Mr. Waldron stated he formally requested, at the 12/29/66 hearing, who the residents were that requested the annexation. He said he had not received the information. Mayor Brian commented he had received a variety of telephone calls and citizens have also been quoted in the newspaper regarding this issue. 5. Mr. Waldron said the notice he received stated the City would provide sewer and storm drainage. He questioned whether the City would provide sewer and storm drainage to Washington Square. City Administrator responded, for the record, that all of the cost data used was referenced in the Staff Report as coming from the County 2000 Study. He stated sewer service would be provided by contract with the City through the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) for treatment and sewer line maintenance and billing would be administered by the City. He advised Mr. Waldron that the City had an agreement with USA regarding service delivery upon annexation. The City Administrator noted storm drainage would be handled through the City storm drainage utility. He further advised Council that Washington Square currently impacts land inside the city limits with storm drainage runoff. Mr. Waldron requested the annexation be delayed. He said he understands from Beaverton and other public records that the area agreement, in which an arbitrary line to divide up the Washington Square area between Beaverton and Tigard, expires March 31st. He cautioned the City Council on the issue of gerrymandering. Mr. Waldron concluded his remarks by saying, "I want you to understand the legal ramifications of what you are doing." i. Mayor Brian counted those who signed up for public testimony noting those who were in or out of the area to be annexed. The count, less written comments, indicated the following: Proponents — 11 total with 9 living in the area, 2 living out Opponents — 13 total with 8 living in the area, 5 living out j . Mayor Brian referred to the letters received at, and previous to, the meeting on this proposal. Ms. Whiting presented three letters in opposition and were noted during her testimony. Mayor Brian received a letter from Mr. Ken Rasmussen, 10010 S. W. Johnson, indicating his support of the proposal. The City Recorder entered the following letters into the record: o Marjorie Haglund, 11075 S.W. Hall Boulevard, supporting annexation o Emily Louise Roe, 3030 S.W. Upper Drive, Portland, owns property at 9560 S.W. Greenburg Road, supporting annexation o Dan Agun, 9445 S.W. Lehman Street, Portland, opposing annexation o Richard Irwin, owner of Lot 3800 in proposed annexation area, supporting annexation. �' Page 9 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 1987 k. Community Development Director recommended Council forward the annexation to the Boundary Commission for final action. Mayor Brian asked the Community Development Director if he had a recommendation on the three options. The Community Development Director responded that any of the alternatives could work from the standpoint of the Community Development Department servicing the area. 1. Council Comments/Discussion/Questions: o Council commented on the differences between the options. City Administrator clarified road jurisdiction by reporting that if the road jurisdiction were transferred after the annexation to the City, the City would then assume responsiblity for road maintenance. He advised Council that the City policy was that roads are maintained at the condition to which they were built; i.e. , gravel roads are maintained as gravel roads and asphalt roads are maintained through pothole patching. He stated additional improvements would occur first to arterial and collector streets and then to residential streets as funds are available or as property owners initiate LID requests. o Councilor Schwartz asked for clarification on funding of street lighting. "The City Administrator responded that street lighting would be included in the Cita street lighting budget for existing street lights. He advised that Metzger residents, who have street lights, are currently paying extra for street lights through a County Service District and this payment would be absorbed by Tigard upon annexation. The Administrator then explained that new street lights in the City were added on a priority basis by Council direction. M. Legal Counsel stated he wished to respond to a comment made by Mr. Waldron. He advised Council that it was appropriate, at this hearing, to consider any of the three alternatives which were proposed by staff and noted Council would be making a recommendation to the Boundary Commission. Legal Counsel advised nothing was added to the proposed district and that staff responded to a study of the provision of services and hearing comments. n. Public Hearing Closed o. RESOLUTION NO. 87-08 A RESOLUTION RESPONDING TO A CLARIFICATION REQUEST BY THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO RESOLUTION NO. 86-140 (ZCA 20-86 - SOUTH METZGER) p. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to approve Resolution No. 87-08 for legal description clarification. Approved by a unanimous vote of the Council present. q. Councilor Johnson recommended that the Resolution denoted as Option B T be considered. Councilor Eadon concurred. r. RESOLUTION NO. 87-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REAFFIRMING THE DECEMBER 29, 1986, REQUEST TO THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO ANNEX AN Page 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1987 AREA REFERRED TO AS "SOUTH METZGER" AND FURTHER REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THAT ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. S. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to recommend adoption of Resolution No. 87-10 to request the Boundary Commission to consider a modification of the annexation proposal. Discussion on the motion included the City Administrator clarifying that the amended document handed out to the Council at the meeting is the document that is under consideration. Councilor Johnson advised that the amended document was delivered to her that morning prior to the public hearing. Councilor Schwartz asked for and received from Council and staff clarification as to the difference between the Resolution with Option B and the Resolution with Option C. Mayor Brian noted that this was a two-step process. If Council passed Proposal B, it would go to the Boundary Commission where it could be rejected, modified or accepted. If the Boundary Commission accepted the recommendation, a 45-day waiting period would occur during which 10% of the registered voters could sign a petition to get the issue before the voters in the area. Councilor Eadon commented that her preference was for Proposal B due to simplification of service delivery. This proposal would keep service vehicles for the City within jurisdictional lines when servicing the people on Spruce Street. Councilor Eadon said that Option C would be detrimental to service delivery since it would split property lots in and outside the City. Motion passed by a unanimous vote of Council present. t. Mayor Brian stated the Resolution would be forwarded to the Boundary Commission for a February 12, 1987 hearing. COUNCILOR JOHNSON LEFT THE MEETING AT 1:44 P.M. 4. ADJOURNMENT: 1:45 P.M. r ity Record r^- City of Tigard ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard cw/4501A Page 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1987 10 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed Special Meeting - Tigard City Council - January 14, 1987; 12:00 Noon STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard ) I, Catherine Wheatley being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Notice of Special Meeting for the CounciMeeting ted anuary lLL ch f notice being hereto attached and 12:00 Noon a copy O 1987. by reference made a part hereof, on the th day of January, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. x Subscribed and sworn to before me this .3� day of " 4' 198K Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: \ December 31, 1986 1 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING \ TIGARD CITY C uNIL Notice is hereby give that a special cit Council metin, called by the Mayor with the mmon consent of the Council, will be held on January 14, 1987 at 12:00 Noon at Tigard civic Center, Town Hall Rom, 13125 S.W. Nall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. The eting is called for te purpose of holding a second Public Hearing for te Zone Chne Annexation Z A 8-86 Alm s ns`. \ Inc., NPO #6 and the Zn Change Rn■aion ZCA 20-86 South Mt r NPO #2 & a. < »1hn E. Cook, Mayor \ƒ c/44 2 ` �\ \� �ƒ ®.•. ■....�. .�. ,,� � �� I �` i • « � `� s r ,��'. � ?• � � • - 11 i �, h �;� �: 1� +� �� i,• � �� to �' �� i� •`� 1 � ,' �� � �. _ - � �� ,� ��� �� �� '' �� ' ► ' �'� i� ,� � �� ,, •i M '� �,. � �" � �� ��. � � � � . ' t 1 1 � � � 1 � t a � *:. w] � ��� �� 1 • r 7 I 1 H rou 00, _ no J �• o a0to o w k 3 r A O 4 t / O t S 4r. 41 o 43 0 �v a �a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 14, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: _January 9, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 2nd Public PREVIOUS ACTION: December 29 1986 Hearing - ALBERTSONS ZCA 8-86 Public Hearing & Res. 86-139 Adoption PREPARED BY: Loreeri_Wilson DEPT HEAD OK TTY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City Council POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council reaffirm desire to annex the originally proposed Albertsons annexation request as heard at the December 29, 1986 Council meeting? INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard City Council adopted Resolution No. 86-93 on August 25, 1986 to forward this annexation to the Boundary Commission as a triple majority proposal. On December 11, 1986 the Boundary Commission denied the request based on a recent Oregon Court of Appeals decision on triple majority annexations. The Council then held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to consider initiating the annexation and adopted Resolution No. 86-139 forwarding the proposal to the Boundary Commission under a new status of "Council initiated". At the 12/29/86, meeting one issue frequently addressed during another public hearing indicated the meeting notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice. The Council has called for another public hearing to be held 1/14/87 to offer additional opportunity for public testimony. Staff has included all information submitted at the 12/29/86 hearing as the record for this additional hearing. Please bring your information from that meeting to save on a:.dditional copying costs. A signed copy of Resolution 86--139 is attached for your information and a new resolution which reaffirms your 12/29/86 position. ___...r ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Reaffirm Council initiated annexation request as adopted on 12/29/96. 2. Suggest a modification to the annexation request for Boundary Commission review basad on new information received at the 1/14/87 public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED AMON Alternative NI - Motion to adopt resolution to reaffirm Council initated annexation request as adopted on 12/29/86. j Iw/4486A ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT (SUPPLEMENTAL TO 12/29/86 PLANNING STAFF REPORT) JANUARY 8, 1987 SOUTH METZGER ANNEXATION ZCA 20-86 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Location: East of Highway 217, South of Hall Boulevard, Locust and Spruce Streets, west of the Multnomah/Washington County Line, and north of Highway 99W and Pfaffle Street (Exhibit 1.1). Applicant: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 Size: 390 Acres Assessed Val_ uation: $139,737,400.00 Estimated Population: 1200 Existing Land Use: Single Family Units - 367 Multi-Finaily Units - 140 Commercial Units - 53 Public Facilities - Crescent Grove Cemetery Metzger School 2. LAW USE AND PLAI�MIM� Vicinity Information: The proposed area is bordered on the north by developed single family units, on the west by Highway 217, on the south by the City of Tigard and on the east by the City of Portland. S119 Inly-EMUon: Most of the area consists of detached single-family dwellings. Major commercial use is the Washington Square Mall and Lincoln Center. Also located in the area is the Crescent Grove Cemetery and Metzger School. The area contains approximately 11.75 acres of vacant land. - i - Washington County Planning: The territory is designated Urban on the acknowledged County Comprehensive Plan. The area is covered by the Metzger-Progress Community Plan. The Community Plan (Element 22) discourages, but does not prohibit, annexation of smaller portions within the larger Plan area. The County Plan specifically defers to the County-City Urban Planning Area Agreements in regard to "piecemeal" or small area annexations. This Plan, which covers an area larger than the area proposed for annexation, was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on December 27, 1983. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan has been reviewed by LCOC and found to be in compliance with the state-wide planning goals. it is considered to be an element of the County Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit 2.1). City of Tigard Planning: a. Urban Planning Area Agreement The City of Tigard has an acknowledged City Limit plan. ORS 215.130 provides that "land use and zoning designations on areas annexed to cities will continue in effect unless, or until the City has by ordinance or provision provided otherwise." Furthermore the City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into an Urban Planning Area Agreement the effective date of which is September 9. 1986, The Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) is considered to be a part of both the County's and the City's adopted Comprehensive Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which the City assumes responsibility for land use planning, and an "Area of Interest" in which the County agrees to coordinate its planning due to the potential impacts on the adjacent City. The South Metzger proposal falls within the rules for the Tigard "Area of Interest." "4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the "Area of Interest" subject to the following: "A. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for development. "S. Annexations by the CITY within the Are► of Interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. "C. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other representative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest. NOT CONTRARY TO THE FOREGOING, THE CITY RESERVES ALL OF ITS RIGHTS TO AMEX AND ACKNOWLEDGES THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS TO ANNEX TO THE CITY PURSUANT TO OREGON REVISED STATUTES. (Capitalization added for emphasis.) - 2 - I'D. Upon annexation of land within the area of Interest to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CITY plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY designations. Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for one year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation is outdated and an amendment may be initiated before the one year period is over." b. Municipal Urban Services Policy The City of Tigard has conducted a Municipal Services Study covering the area proposed for -Annexation. The study describes the area, discusses annexation, service provision, expenditure requirements, revenue projections, etc. On July 14, 1986, the City of Tigard adopted an Urban Services Policy declaring its willingness to plan and ultimately provide urban services in an area around the current City limits. The area proposed for annexation falls within the territory covered by this policy (Exhibit 2.2). 3. SERVICES AND UTILITIES Sanitary Sewers The area to be annexed is within the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) of Washington County as is the City of Tigard. USA provides sewage treatment and construction and maintenance of major transmission lines to the Metzger area and the City. Within the unincorporated area of Metzger, the Agency also maintains all smaller saw lines and bills the customers. Inside the City of Tigard, the USA is responsible for all lines 24 inches and larger while the City is responsible for all smaller lines and for billing, hook-ups, etc. The Unified Sewerage Agency bills once a year for a charge of $129 and its hook-up fee is $975 for a single family dwelling. The City bills monthly at $11.50 or '$136 per year (which includes a $.75 storm drainage surcharge) and the hook-up fes for a single family dwelling is $975. USA assesses a property tax, which goes towards payment of bonds sold to construct district-wide, major improvements and regional treatment plants. This tax, which for the 1995-86 tax year was 5.36 per $1,000 of assessed value, would therefore remain the same. Storm Drainage The proposed area lies within the Ask Creek drainage basin. This basin runs south and west into the City of Tigard where it joins Fanno Creek (Exhibit 3.1). 3 - There are three drainage systems within the area: r i { a. Washington Square Ir b. Ash Creek C. Ash Brook 4 1) Washington Square, the commercial mall at the westernmost section of the area, contains 137.35 acres of which 115.95 acres is impervious surface. The area drains directly into the City of Tigard through two culvert and pipe systems under Highway 217 to the Cascade Boulevard area (Exhibit 3.2). 2) The Ash Creek area consists of the area between Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. This system drains south into Ash Creek and then joins Fanno Creek in the City of Tigard. 3) The Ash Brook area consists of the residential area east of Hall Boulevard and south of Spruce Street. This area drains south and west through a pipe and open culvert system into Ash Creek within the City of Tigard just north of Highway 217. Washington County has recently completed the "Ash Creek Drainage Master a Plan" which recommends seven projects within the area to improve storm drainage and alleviate flooding problems (see Exhibit 3. 1). Costs within the three areas are: a. Washington Square $ 42,100 b. Ash Creek 299,60 C. Ash Brook 640,200 $971,900 (Exhibit 3.3) The Plaster Plan has not identified a firm funding formula and to date Washington County has not addressed the issue in detail. Water Service The territory to be annexed is entirely within the Metzger Water District which also serves portions of the City of Tigard with the remainder of the City within the Tigard Water District. The City does not provide water service. Therefore no change in water service will occur as a result of this annexation. Fire_ Protoctiorr The territory to be annexed is mostly within Washington County RFPD M1. A small portion of the area lying between Pfaffle and Spruce Street is within Tualatin RFPD. The City of Tigard is also entirely within these € two rural fire protection districts. Fire service will therefore not change as a result of this annexation. r 4 Parks The area is within the boundarisi of the Metzger Park LID. The LID was formed to insure funding for operation of the park and bond retirement. The LID assesses $.12 per $1,000 AV. 4 - Metzger Park is north of the area and operation of the park and participation in the LID will not be affected. The City of Tigard operates a Park system funded through the property tax. The system consists of one city-wide park, one community park, four neighborhood parks, and three mini-parks. Library The City of Tigard maintains its own library and is currently a partner in the Washington County Cooperative Library Service (WCCLS). Residents of the proposed area currently use the Tigard Library under the current WCCL.S levy which expires June 30. 1987. If annexed, residents would be able to continue to use the Tigard Library free of charge, even if the WCCLS levy is not extended and fees for out-of-City patrons are imposed. Street Lighting Currently, street lights in the area are provided through Washington County Service District #I. Lighting in the district is dependent on formation of Local Improvement Districts covering the area desiring lighting and then sharing the costs of the lights through a yearly assessment on each benefited lot. The assessments vary depending on when the particular LID was formed, the type of light, etc. There are three assessment districts within the proposed area. They are: a. Ashbrook Farms $37.68 per year b. Lehman 30.32 per year C. Metzger Acres 45.75 per year The City of Tigard pays for street lighting costs out of its Street Fund which has as its primary source of revenue, State-shared gasoline tax money. If the annexation is approved, property owners currently paying street lighting assessments (these appear on the yearly tax bill from the County even though they are not taxes) would be relieved of those obligations. This change would take place on July 1, 1987 to coincide with the time the City would be receiving State-shared revenues generated by the annexed area. Street The City would take over jurisdiction of the majority of the streets in the area to be annexed. (Taking over jurisdiction for the purpose of assigning maintenance responsibility is a separate City-initiated action which takes place subsequent to annexation.) Exceptions to this would be Scholls Ferry Road and SW 80th Avenue which are major collectors/arterials for the County and over which the County may wish to continue jurisdiction. Hail Boulevard is still designated as a State Highway and the State therefore retains maintenance responsibility for it as well as for Highway 217. Generally speaking the County has not had money in recent years for local street maintenance and in fact has had to carefully prioritize its expenditures on major thoroughfares. Local street improvement has been up to local property owners willing to pay the entire cost of improvements 1 through neighborhood Local Improvement Districts (LTD's). - 5 - Major impacts on the street system in the proposed area are Washington Square and Lincoln Len on l• t e major complexes ecollectors arterdan iais inincrease These the area traffic volume on not y Road, and Highway 217) but also on the (Hall Boulevard, Scholls Ferry minor collectors and local streets. The increase in trafficGreaenb �rg adversely affected, in particular, Locust Street, Oak Street, (from Hall Boulevard to Highway 99W in Tigard). Spruce Street from approximately SW 77th Avenue to Hall S Additionally, p ravel-improved or unimproved right-of--way. This Boulevard is primarily 9 could have an impact on delivery of emergency services. Police The Washington County Sheriff's Department currently providesin the law an functions in the proposed area. Current service 7 officers Per unincorporated areas of Washington County response approximate in the area varies 1,000 (1 per 1,400 residents). Emergency patrol from 5 to 15 minutes depending upon the location of the sector car, Response to non-eawrgencY calls varies from 30 to 45 minutes. law cement ervices in Washington Square is the largest conthe umer Washington to Cou County Sheriffs and Oregon the area and relies heavily upon the Wa r►g force which makes State Police. Washing maintains is custody toone ofsecurity the above-mentioned "citizen arrests and hen transfe ro agencies. The agencies then en jailte and and assumes inv stigatiosell or norre ponsibility for booking in the County handles traffic control functions on the Washington Square security shopping center proper^ty. provides a service level of 1 officer per 775 The City of Tigard currently p of Tigard is under five residents. Emergency response within the City minutes. The City would hire additional officers to improve swrvice level ratios and response time- 4. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS -- St�eats vements have been identified in the Municipal Services The following impro Study for the purposed area: a. Lincoln Street - Extension from Locust Street to Oak Street and improve to minor collector sta to major collector status from Lincoln b. Locust Street - improvement Street to Hall Boulevard. C. Greenburg Road - Widen final section to five lanes. d. Greonburg ROM/Highway 217 - Provide additional 17raffic capacity on Greenburg Road overpass from louthbound Highway Pedestrian Network bikeways in the vicinity of Metzger Irrove pedestrian walkways and and along Nall Boulevard. School, Washington Square, - 6 - - Storm Drainage See storm drainange Section 3. 5. CONCLUSIONS Boundary Commission Policy Under Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR 193-05-00), the Boundary Commission has developed and adopted three policies related to annexation (Exhibit 5.1). They are: a. Policy on incorporated status. The Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban services. b. Policy on mediation, coordination, and maintenance of financial integrity. The Commission recognizes that the growth of cities may create financial difficulties for special districts and that jurisdiction should mediate boundary disputes. C. policy on long range government structure. The Commission generally favors logical long term arrangements of governmental structure which may dictate approval of irregular boundaries in the short term. Within the guidelines of the above policies, the following conclusions are valid: a. The City of Tigard is the logical provider of services for the urban unincorporated area within this proposal. b. 1) This annexation proposal will create no financial impact on the special districts currently providing service within the proposed area. 2) The City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard have agreed with passage of the Annexation Planning Area Agreement that the City of Tigard is the logical provider of services within this area. C. The proposed area provides a more logical boundary than exists and lies within the long range planning limits of the City of Tigard. Sanitary Sewer and Stores Drainage Sanitary sewer and stone drainage within the proposed area impact the City of Tigard. Annexation of the area would provide single jurisdiction control, maintenance, planning, and response to the needs of the proposed area and the current residents of the city. CWater Service x No impact. - 7 - -. Fire Protection No impact. Parks No impact. Library Library services are assured to City residents beyond the term of any WCCLS levy. Street Lighting City of Tigard funding mechanisms for street lighting would eliminate property tax assessment for the provision of this service. Streets Local street maintenance and traffic engineering functions within the proposed area would be better served by a jurisdiction impacted by traffic related to activity within the area and that has funding mechanisms available to accomplish those functions. The City will prioritize capital improvements required in the area within the framework of its Capital Improvement Plan. Police L, The City of Tigard would be able to provide a more adequate level of service to the residential and commercial areas within the proposal at a more reasonable cost. 6. REV€NUE ESTIMATES The following revenue estimates are based upon 1986/67 figures. PROPERTY TAX $139,737,400 x $1.94 $271,090.55 SHARED REVENUES (1,200 RESIDENTS)1 Gas Tax $22.08 $ 26,496.00 Cigarette Tax 4.20 5,040.00 Liquor Tax 7.59 9,108.00 State Revenue Sharing 5.00 6•000•00 TOTAL $ 46,644.00 FRANCHISE FEES2 $ 70,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE; $387,734.55 1 LOC estimates 2 Estimate based upon "Municipal Services Study' 3 Excluding user fee items — 9 — 7.• RECOMMENDATIONS i. Annexation The City and Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission approve the annexation as being consistent with the following: � t Urban Planning Area Agreement Annexation Planning Area Agreement Oregon Administrative Rules 193--05-000 Sanitary Sewers Upon annexation the City of Tigard and the Unified Sewerage n nCecy enter through into an intergovernmental r m n a11986-87 ee and ittheS City alassuming responsibility the remainder FY 1987-88. Personnel and equipment requirements are estimated to bel : $25,000 one Utility Worker 11 20,000 One Utility Worker 1 19,000 One Maintenance Worker g 000 Material and Supplies ,$73000 1 Personnel and equipment requirements are for both sanitary sewers and storm drainage. . ..: Storm Drainage ge Pan" The City work within the f th&r Statef and Countyr to the "Ash Ceek �esolve0 raidrarinage land and in cooperation with flooding problems in the area. Water Service No change recommended. F r+m to tion No change recommended. Parks No change recommended. 714¢ Libr ar No change recommended Street�tiffl The City of Tigard assume costs of street lighting in the proposed area n 1987-58. - 9 - Streets The City of Tigard initiate a transfer of jurisdiction of all local streets and minor collectors in the area effective FY 1987-88 and major R collectors dependent on County policy. The City should prioritize capital projects in streets and pedestrian/bike ways as outlined in the Metzger-Progress Circulation Study (see Urban Services Study) with the FY 1987-88 CIP. Estimated Personnel and Equipment Requirements: 1 Utility Worker II $ 25.000 2 Utility Worker I 40.000 1-Ton Truck 14,000 1 1 Pick-Up Truck 17 500 103,500 Polic The City of Tigard assume emergency response in the area effective no later than May 1, 1987 and coordinate with the Washington County Sheriff for full assumption of patrol and investigation responsibility July 1, 1967 but no later than September 1, 1987 (dependent on staffing). The following personnel and equipment requirements are based upon City of Tigard Police Department estimates (Exhibit 7.1): Four Patrol Officers i One Investigator $172,000 One Dispatcher 23,605 Two Vehicles 23• Miscellaneous Equipment _ 14.500 $233,365 Robert JOan City nistrator RW.sb/0369W :c f � - 10 - s CITY OF TIGARD,_OREGON 3 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: December 29 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: December 22, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: Council adopted Albertsons' Annexation ZCA 8-86 Resolution 86-93 on August 25, 1986 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPT HEAD OK.&ZA CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City Council _ POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council initiate a 19.04 acre annexation to the City as originally proposed by Albertsons' Inc. The property is located on the southeast corner of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. INFORMATION SUMMARY On August 25, 1986 the City Council adopted a resolution to forward a triple majority annexation request for the subject property to the the Council Portland adopted Area Local Government Boundary Commission. In addition, resolution to change the zoning on the property. On December 8, 1966 the City Council adopted a resolution with conditions to change the zoning on the subject property to C-G. One of the conditions attached to the approval is that the property be annexed to the City. On October 1, 1986 the City submitted the triple majority annexation to the Boundary Commission. On December 11, 1986, the Boundary Commission denied the triple majority annexation based on a recent Court of Appeals ruling. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached resolution to initiate the annexation proposal. 2. Take no action. 3. Deny the resolution. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution to initiate the annexation proposal. (EAN:cn/2821P) STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM DECEMBER 29, 1986 - 6:30 PM TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: ZCA 8-86 Zone Change Annexation REQUEST: A request to annex 19.04 acres into the City of Tigard. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 2S1 158A 200, 300, 400 - High Density Residential 2S1 15A 2800, 2802, 2900, 3000, 3001, & 3302 - Medium High Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: 2S1 158A 200, 300, 400 - R40 2S1 15A 2800, 2802, 2900, 3000, 3001, & 3002 - R25 APPLICANT: Albertsons' Inc. OWNER: Herbert and Betty Dayson 10230 SW Hall Blvd. H. E. and Amy Randall Portland, OR 97223 Gary and Nadine Randall Donald & Jo Ann Randall Health Resources Inc. Arthur and Ann Marie Low c/o William & Judith Brownson LOCATION: The property is located on the southeastern corner of 99W and Durham Road. 2. Background Information On August 25, 1986 the City Council adopted a resolution to forward a triple majority annexation request for the subject 'property to the Portland Area Local Government Boundary Commission. In addition, the Council adopted a resolution to change the zoning on the property to the designations indicated above. This property is not subject to the one year limit on zone changes after annexation like Metzger is. Unlike Metzger, this property is within the City's Urban Planning Area and the City may consider zone changes and plan amendments at any time. On December 8, 1986 the City Council adopted a resolution with conditions to change the zoning on the subject property to C-G. One of the conditions attached to the approval is that the property be annexed STAFF REPORT - ZCA 8-86 (Albertsons') - PAGE i to the City. On October 1, 1986 the City submitted the triple majority annexation to the Boundary Commission. On December 11, 1986 the Boundary Commission denied the triple majority annexation based on a recent Oregon Court of Appeals ruling. 3. Vicinity Information The property to the north across Durham Road is zoned C-G and medium high density residential and is developed as the Summerfield commercial and residential development. The property to the east is zoned medium density and is underdeveloped as large lot single family housing. A 30 acre mobile home park lies to the south on property zoned medium density. King City lies across Pacific Highway to the west. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The property slopes gently to the southeast and has second growth trees scattered on the site. There are 6 single family homes on large lots within the area proposed for annexation. 5. Agency and NPO Comments No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. B. FINDIMGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1 and 10.1.2 and Chapter 18.136 and Chapter 18.138 of the Community Development Code. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal as submitted is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: a. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. b. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the Police Department has been notified and the land is located within Tigard's Urban Planning Area. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon findings noted below: a. Chapter 18.136 is met because the applicant has met all of the approval standards for annexation of property. b. Chapter 18.138 is met because the land meets the definition for buildable lands as defined by OAR 660-07-000 and shall be designated as "developing area" on the Development Standards Area Map. 3 STAFF REPORT - ZCA 8-86 (Albertsons') - PAGE 2 �x C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of ZCA 8-86 subject to the following conditions: R' 1. The property shall be designated as a "developing area" on the Development Standard Areas map. 2. All development on the property shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard. 3. The City of Tigard Police Department shall review the proposal. fAZ1 M r112= EPARE BY: El beth Newton APPRO D : William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Community Development (EAN:cn/2814P) STAFF REPORT — ZCA, 8-86 (Albertsons') — PAGE 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 86— A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED (ALBERTSONS' INC. ZCA B-86). WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council adopted Resolution 86-93 on August 25, 1986 to forward this annexation proposal to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission as a triple majority proposal; and WHEREAS, the Boundary commission denied the proposal on December 11, 1986 based on a recent Oregon Court of Appeals decision on triple majority annexations; and WHEREAS, annexation to the City of the territory described in Exhibit "B" attached would constitute a minor boundary change" under the boundary commission law., ORS 199.410 to 199.510, and WHEREAS, by authority of ORS 199.490(i)(a) the Council of the city of Tigard may initiate the annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(1)(a) hereby initiates proceedings for annexation of the territory described in Exhibit "B" to the City. SECTION 2: The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission approve it. SECTION 3: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Resolution with the Commission at once. PASSED: This a!a day of �PC(?YY1�211'_11� 1986. President of Council — City of Tigard ATTEST �RecorHder ity — City of Tigard ( (EAN:cn/2817P) RESOLUTION NO. 86 _ Page l SLC MAP zs . IooC LD SEE MAP 2s 1 1000 •pi'ry'� C.. r.w• Q � �.grs.+rr `••.� Z • 3. ..wr.w w•w - — — - _ _ •- / r fi fir.. �•"`r,� - �� •_ i.G rrr«r.rr 3001 3000 3002 s i Z oo .70 Ac. 184 Ac. 61 A f. :N4 • • r .Z3-?4 • too its •. - � 1 S i {)j 200 2802 ♦ �� 0 LlOAa _ i 41Z. t+ *s Z zr _ �3_`T� 2803 2oo1:.a — .. � � ..se.. ti s t.. f-. • rrr.• goo sus••e't e u K • 2700 1 r t./aAe 1 e goo sit' � _ .1 2703 •ato 2702� 705 2704 0 t.ssA.. _ .J$"` t.It Ac o « 2�) '•sr.o r 1 ,0 .o 2G.0 .. 1 t: :s wt I LEGAL DESCRIPTION } Apart of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 15, T 2 S, R 1 W, W. M. , Washinovlkn County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning. at a point on the North section line of said Section 15, said point also being on the northerly extension of the West right-of-way line of S. W. 113th Avenpe (County Road No. 1364) ; a thence along said West right-of-way line South 695.89 feet ; thence North 89. 47, 00" West 640 feet, more or less, to the West Tline of Lot 19, WILLOWBROOK FARM, recorded plat in Washington 34 County Platt Records; thence along the East line of the Northeast quarter , of the Northwest quarter of said Section 15 South 0. 154 0011 West to a point 352.51 feet; thence North 89. 49. 30" West Y 650 feet, more or leas, to the East line of the Oregon State- United States Highway 99W right-of-way; thence North 15. 08, 001, u East 402.35 feet; thence North 19. 331. 30" East 347.6 feet along the East 1•ine of said right-of-way; thence South 89' 49, 30" East r 430.2 Feet, more or less, ' to the East line of the Northeast quarter -of the .Northwesfo quarter of said Section 15, thence North 0• 15, 00" : West aXonq said •Eaist line 330 -feet, more or less, to ' the 'Korth,quarter. corner -of said Section 15; also being the Northwest corner of Lot 18 of said WILLOWBROOK FARM; thence East 640 feet, along the North line of said Lot 18 to the point of true beginning. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 14, 1987 DATE SUBMITTED: January 9, 1987 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 2nd Public PREVIOUS ACTION: December 29, 1986 Hearing - South Metzger Annexation Public Hearing & Annexation Res. 86-140 ZCA 20-86 PREPARED BY: Jill Monley DEPT HEAD OKtj CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City Council POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council reaffirm desire to annex the originally proposed South Metzger Annexation request as heard at the December 29, 1986 Council meeting, or suggest a modification to that request? INFORMATION SUMMARY The Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to receive public testimony regarding the proposal South Metzger Annexation. At that meeting much testimony was received that indicated the hearing notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens in the area were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice. Also, some residents along Spruce Street (from Precinct #27) indicated that this area was not within Precinct #192 (which precinct voted 2 to 1 to join the City at the 11/4/86 election). The Council passed Resolution No, 86-140 at the 12/29/86 meeting forwarding the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission for a hearing on 2/12/87. The Council also called for another public hearing to be held 1/14/87 to offer additional opportunity for public testimony. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Staff has prepared three options for consideration which address various concerns. OPTION A: Should the Council wish to reaffirm the original annexation and make no modification suggestions to the Boundary Commission, Option A resolution should be adopted. OPTION B: Should the Council wish to reaffirm the original annexation but suggest a modification to the Boundary Commission to address service delivery concerns, Option B resolution should be adopted. As outlined in the staff reports, Spruce Street between SW Hall Blvd. and SW 79th Avenue is fragmented into different sections of road with limited improvement to the right-of-way. Substantial improvements are seen on that portion east of SW 79th Avenue to SW 71st Avenue. OPTION C: Should the Council wish to reaffirm the original annexation but suggest a modification to the Boundary Commission to address removal of Precinct #27 from the annexation proposal, Option C resolution should be adopted. Staff has researched the precinct boundaries along the Spruce Street portion of the annexation area. Precinct #192 runs basically along the back side of those homes on the south side of Spruce Street. PAGE 2 COUNCIL SUMMARY MEMO SOUTH METZGER ANNEXATION ZCA 20-811 1/14/87 COUNCIL MEETING FISCAL IMPACT Option "B" would optimize the service delivery cost, therefore fiscally create the least expense. however, under Options "A" b "C", the City could provide service delivery with a minimum cost impact. SUGGESTED ACTION City Council should state their preferred option after the public hearing and discussion have occurred. Council would then pass the appropriate resolution and direct staff to prepare the necessary legal description. ti {t_ J„Y _fir{ rs ;5 >i sk. lw/4486A OPTION A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE INITIATION OF ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED SOUTH METZGER ZCA 20-86). WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to consider initiating annexation of the territory outlined on the attached map; and WHEREAS, the Council initiation pro.--ss is being used since the triple- majority annexation process was recently challenged in the Oregon Court of Appeals and the triple-majority process is ;till being questioned; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 86-140 on December 29, 1986 to forward the proposal to the Portlard Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission for a hearing on 2/12/87; and WHEREAS, at the December 29th meeting much testimony was received that indicated the hearing notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens in the area were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice; and WHEREAS, the City Council called a special meeting for January 14, 1987 to allow for additional opportunity to receive testimony on this proposal; and WHEREAS, the City Council further determined the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18. 138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTI _ 1, ,,The Council hereby reaffirms Resolution 86-140, as it was amended.` Ofii_ ;?3�tritlsr� 41, 1987 by Resolution No. 87-09, initiating proceedings for. annexation of the territory as shown on Exhibit "A" and described in Exhibit "B" (attached and made a part hereof) to the City. SECTION 2: The Council hereby determines that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and compr•2hensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments theretu) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. Ic SECTION 3: The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests favorable action by the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. PAGE 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87- SECTION 4: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Resolution with the Commission at once. PASSED: This day of 1987• Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder City of Tigard lw/4486A _r u YP r PAGE ,2 RESOLUTION NO. 87— i ' Ir l�.l�...f►..■•..�r _ 111■ � 1■�S,AMMI/ ■ 'r+� U �����■/ . ♦ rt�r ' ■our► all •r r r1 +��.�..■� �:1! •56■maw ■w �w■ •11 ► �r r 'rr r■llll 1._ uu r111nrL•r11 i �, � � 1►� , `�, ��:'■ 1 .111 4 I 1 1/i11 1 Mr 01111 ' / a�.■ ' .rr� ���; �'' ►�`� ,�t!3ui� : fir ■�■. .1/11.■� 1J I� _ ��� a/!. X11. �® so,0%. mil � Vii. ,•: �- u■nwm ■ ::1111 1. �/- ■■.�1 1_ i .��,. _ . 11■ _� Sol � . - �_ z ...1 r. tul■ ..�J. .illll HEon IT�,.t,�,�w 111111111 Mir Evil wars a� `; �w aul (-�lrr-!� • - 114 - POI: =111 __ ' - - � ■• 1/111111111►= .� '�5 '1 1 'i. X111 .1■gar .1111111 � ■�L/�lt� ■���■: � ��� �■IW1E s,"�" i■w i IralL�1;"ten■ -■.-i ' . �i-� ■:1f111'L■Ii1 j111t11t . 4 r ;1 /I ■K.MM emu ■■u � t = r t 11-i 1■1■a—1111// �.111! X111■ ■ �� �:: n 1111 ' + . °, � � • • :1111: ■L■ . �� .11�•• 1 .� - � +. j �s ■ 1�■�1W! -_ ■� / I - ,� ; a R .INI�. ■ 11 ■1116111Nu WN ��+E 1 ■■L� ti , 1 1'1 4 ,7 � r1111.a 00.911111 Ills '� •� ..ter ii` / d" C i. rr • r14 ��;1 ! rr, ii�. , i , ,r i 1�± r, I rr■ .ilal llllu ..l�II. ■11l� ■11 1� ■1' r rell" �'� r ...■ —111'■ilon w ��I�■ 1111.11111 .r.. - •liilil 111711■Il li � ■� ■1ll>` %o� .. ..■ ..�. •_ ,� k . .1■. .11111 ■ _ / ♦ �q1/11111�111� i E��� .�. �r 1■ w■Jr �. - .� ■ ��r� o y y ,l-* ..�°�� �' �" _ ' /illi t1 111,_ .1■ r il.� �"�" .IN. 1 WIMILT . * ♦ 111' .17� /.•� r-w,.t .$-t - ,r ti: r '� _r l_y �inu•nalr ,n.' tom.off ( 1 ■�■ // �11��3 "1�: u.�NI .�1 �•'� iA 7� r.�t I��1+f,� ■ - .4_------- 11 . 11 lf3 s1r1r1 ,�,:1d` ,: j ' �C.fci � �'� 41� �1 er;`;�GG' / • NMI' � ,1 �U, ,_l 111 ■ � 1.�-- � ■,��.Ir �� _ 6,:: �, � �� ,` � ae�irfl'.rirailPz.e I EXHIBIT F LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION PURPOSES ONLY That portion of land located in Sections 26, 35, and 36, Township 1 South, range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows; Beginning on the centerline of S.W. Greenburg Road (County Road 2472) at its intersection with the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 4, Ashbrook Farm, , a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said point of beginning being on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard; thence North 880 10' East on the south line of Lots 4 and 5, said Ashbrook Farm, 850 feet, more or less, to the southeast comer of said Lot 5 and the centerline of S.W. 95th Ave. (county road No. 1018); thence on said centerline North 070 17' East 125 feet, to the intersection with a westerly extension of the south line of that tract conveyed to Jack D. Godwin, at ux, by deed recorded in Book 443, Page 186, Washington County Deed records; thence South 88° 25' East on the south line of said Godwin tract 205.05 feet to the southeast corner thereof; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, and on the east line :of said Godwin tract North 000 38' West, 140.3 feet to. the south line of that tract conveyed to John 0. Wick, at ux, by deed recorded in Book 468, Page 261, Washington County Deed records; thence on the south line of said Wick tract South 880 25' East, 105.57 feet to a point on the east line of Lot 17, said Ashbrook Farm, (said point bears South 000 04' East 205.45 feet from the northeast corner of said Lot 17); thence on the east line of said Lot 17, South 000 42' East, 73 feet more or less; thence, continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, North 89° 18' East, 73.38 feet; n� thence North 000 42' West, 298 feet to the north right—of-way line of S.W. Oak — PAGE 1 Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East 400 feet, thence South 223.69 feet to the southeasterly right-of-way line of the abandoned Oregon Electric Railroad; thence, on said southeasterly right--of-way line, South 520 13' West, 553.63 feet to the north line of Lot 18, said Ashbrook Farm; thence, on the north line of Lots 18, 20, and 21, said Ashbrook Farm, South 850 45' East 895 feet; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, North 000 42' West, 450.5 feet; thence North 890 18' East 100 feet; thence North 000 42' West 190 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East, 110 feet; thence South 000 42' East 190 feet to the southwest corner of that tract conveyed to Terry W. Mills, at ux, recorded in Book 679, Page 146, Washington County Deed records; thence easterly 299.20 feet to the southeast corner of that tract conveyed to James L. Senkel, at ux, as described in Book 548, Page 67, Washington County Dead Records; thence North on the east line of said Senkei tract and a northerly extension thereof, 190 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East 180 feet to an angle point thereon; thence continuing of the existing city limit of the City of Tigard northeasterly 30 feet; thence, leaving said north right-of-way line, easterly 65 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of Lot . 1, Block 53, Metzger Acre Tracts, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said corner being on the south line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence South 000 07' East on the east lines of Lots 12 and 13, said Ashbrook Farm, 375 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of that tract conveyed to Peter 0. Juve, at ux, as described in Book 333, Page 353, Washington County Deed Records; thence West, on the north line of said Juve tract, 266.24 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence on the C2 west line of said Juve tract and the west line of the Clarence A. Cole, at ux, tract as described in Book 334, Page 91, Washington County Deed Records, South £_. - PAGE 2 - 000 07' East 327.23 feet to the re-entry corner in the west line of said Cole tract; thence West, on the boundary of said Cole tract, 184.26 feet to the most westerly northwest corner thereof; thence South 000 07' East, on the west line of said Cole tract 69.26 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 947); thence West on said north right-of may line, 25 feet, more or less, to the west right-of--way line of S.W. 89th Avenue; thence South 000 17' West, on said west right-of-way line, 504.4 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 36, Graham Acres, a recorded Plat, Washington County Plat records; thence South 890 07' East 475.70 feet to the west line of said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence, continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, South 000 17' West on the east line of the D.C. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52, 291.05 feet; thence South 880 42' East 295.62 feet to the center of S.W. Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947); thence on the centerline of S.W. Hall Boulevard, South QO° 50' West, 74.75 feet to the intersection with an easterly extension of the south line of Lot 10, Block O, said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence westerly, on the south line of said Lot 10, 294.8 feet more or less, to the east line of the said Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52; thence southerly, on said east line, 380 feet, mora or less to the intersection with the northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217; thence southeasterly, on said northeast right-of-away line and a southeasterly extension thereof (said line being the existing city limit of the City of Tigard) 420 feet, more or less, to the intersection of a westerly extension of the south right-of-way line of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence easterly, on said south right-of--way line and the extension thereof, 260 feet, more or less, to the east line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim No. 53; thence southerly, on said east line, said line also being the east line of Lot 20, Block 0, said Metzger Acre Tracts, 110 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said Lot 20; thence westerly 75 feet, more or less, on the south line of said Lot 20 to its intersection with the - PAGE 3 - northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 717; thence southeasterly, along said northeasterly right-of-way line, 490 feet more or less to the west line of that tract of land conveyed to Arthur W. and Margaret C. Verharen in Book 1062, Page 492, Washington County Deed Records; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard North 000 36' West 430 feet, more or less, to the centerline of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence on said centerline South 890 48" East approximately 208 feet to a northerly extension of the east line of that tract conveyed to J.C. Peterson, et ux, by deed recorded in Book 142, Page 59, Washington County Deed Records; thence North 130 20' West 25 feet, more or less, on said northerly extension to,the intersection with a westerly extension of the north right-of-way line (said north line being parallel with, and 25 feet north of the centerline) of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence easterly, on said north line of S.W. Pfaffle Street, 1080 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the east line of Friendly Acres, a recorded plat, Washington f County Plat Records; thence northerly, on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, 1347 feet, more or less, to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence on said north line South 890 02' East, 55.8 feet; thence North 000 17' East, 108.10 feet to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 929); thence on said south line North 890 56' 09" East 147 feet to the east right-of-way line of S.W. 78th Avenue; thence on said east line on a 15 foot radius curve concave to the southeast 23.47 feet; thence continuing on said east right-of--way line South 000 17' West, 123.54 feet; thence North 890 56' 09" East, 100 feet; thence South 000 17' West, 85 feet; thence North 89° 56' 09" East, 37.76 feet, thence South 000 17' West 175.63 feet; thence South 890 16' 58" East 206.6 feet; thence South 000 11' West 1062.3 feet; thence East, parallel with and 25 feet north of the centerline of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975) 140 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the north right-of-way line of State x - PAGE 4 - Highway 99 West; thence East along said north line 130 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the northwest right-of-way line of State Highway 99 West; thence North 540 East, on said north right-of-way line, 530 feet, more or less; thence North 000 29' East 493.54 feet; thence South 890 East, 192.0 feet; thence North 000 12' East, 100 feet; thence South 890 10' East, 20.60 feet; thence North 000 12' East, 450.6 feet to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence South 880 03' 10" East, 15 fee'-, more or less, to the southwest corner of Block "B" said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence North 125.8 feet on the west line of said Block "B" to the south right-of--way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 929); thence East on said south line 700.65 feet to a point which is 60 feet west of the centerline of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road No. 1080); thence South 138.5 feet; thence East 30 feet, more or less, to the west right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue; thence on said west right--of-way line on a 316.5 foot radius curve concave to the east, approximately 130 feet to a point of tangency on said west line; thence South 28' 57' East, 141.8 feet on said west right-of-way line and its southeasterly extension to the intersection with the northwesterly right-of--way line of State Highway 99 West; thence northeasterly on said northwesterly right-of-way and the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, 710 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue (County Road No. 1456); thence North 000 04' West on said east right-of-way line, 375 feet to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of S.W. Pine Street; thence South 89' 58' East on said south line 190 feet; thence North 670 36' East, 415.35 feet; thence South, 100 feet; thence North 670 36' East 387.0 feet to the east line of said Section 36 and the existing city limits of the City of Portland; thence North leaving the existing city limits of the City of Tigard, and on said section line, �1 525 feet, more or less, to the most easterly southeast corner of Citadel Estates, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North 890 18' - PAGE 5 - 10" West, 264 feet; thence South 122.70 feet; thence North 790 02' West, 11.35 feet; thence North 890 16' West, 469.20 feet to the northerly extension of the east line of Block 2, Villa Ridge, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South 000 40' East, 547.70 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Pine Street; thence North 890 58' West on said north right-of-way line and its westerly extension 250 feet to its intersection with the west right-of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue (County Road 1456); thence South, on said west right-of-way line, 352.20 feet; thence South 720 30' West 198.91 feet; thence North 890 58' West 380 feet to the east right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road 1080); thence North 000 04' West, on said east right-of-way line, 10.70 feet; thence North 890 48' West, on the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street 4000 feet, more or less to the east right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Blvd. (County Road 1165) said east line being parallel with and 30 feet east of the centerline of said S.W. Hall Blvd.; thence northerly, on said east right-of-way line, 1180 feet more or less to the south right--of-way line of S.W. Mapleleaf Street; thence East, on said south line, 10 feat; thence North 236.1 feet; thence East 5 feet; thence North 146.1 feet to a point of curvature near S.W. Locust Street (County Road 749); thence northeasterly, on a 25 foot radius curve concave to the southeast, 39 feet more or less to a point of tangency on the south right-of-way line of said S.W. Locust Street; thence North 70 feet to a= point of tangency on the north right-of--way line of said S.W. Locust Street; thence northwesterly, on a 25 foot radius curve concave to the northeast, 39 feet more or less to the east right-of-way line of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence West, 70 feet to the west right-of-way line of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence South on said west right-of-way line, 30 feet to the north right-of-way line of said S.W. Locust Street; thence westerly, on said north right-of-way line (County Roads 749 and 753), 500 feet, more or less, to the northerly extension of the east right-of-way line of S.W. Jefferson Street; thence northerly on said northerly - PAGE 6 - extension approximately 50 feet to the easterly extension of the north right-of-way line of S.W. Locust Street (County Road 753); thence West, on said easterly extension and said north right-of-way line, approximately 1282 feet to the east line of Lot 2, Block C, Lehmann Acre Tract, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North, on said east line and its northerly extension (being 190.3 feet west of the west right-of-way line of S.W. 92nd Avenue) 1609.2 feet to the south right-of-way line of that public road described in Book 442, page 432, Washington County Deed Records; thence North 890 37' East, 25 feet; thence North 122.9 feet; thence North 890 37' East 20 feet; thence North 010 04' West on said east right--of-way line, approximately 330 feet to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Blvd. , (County Road 1165); thence northwesterly, on said south right-of-way line, approximately 1160 feet; thence South 010 03' West 333 feet; thence North 870 27'12" West, 961.08 feet; thence North 010 07' West 301.5 feet; thence North 89° 41' West, approximately 750 feet to the east right--of--way line of State Highway No. 217 and the existing city limit of the City of Beaverton; thence continuing on said existing city limit and the east right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217, southerly 1700 feet, more or less, to a point common to the city limits of the City of Tigard and the City of Beaverton (said point being approximately 660 feet north of the south line of said Section 26); thence -southeasterly, on the existing ci_ty limit of the City of Tigard and the east right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217, 2750 feet, more or less to the intersection with the centerline of SW Greenburg Road (County Road 2472); thence southwesterly, on said centerline, 635 feet more or less, to the point of beginning, containing approximately 390 acres. JF:sb12890P - PAGE 7 OPTION A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE INITIATION OF ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT "A" AND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED (SOUTH METZGER ZCA 20-86). WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to consider initiating annexation of the territory outlined on the attached map; and WHEREAS, the Council initiation process is being used since the triple- majority annexation process was recently challenged in the Oregon Court of Appeals and the triple-majority process is still being questioned; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 86-140 on December 29, 1986 to forward the proposal to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission for a hearing on 2/12/87; and WHEREAS, at the December 29th meeting much testimony was received that indicated the hearing notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens in the area were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice; and WHEREAS, the City Council called a special meeting for January 14, 1987 to allow for additional opportunity to receive testimony on this proposal; and WHEREAS, the City Council further determined that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Council hereby reaffirms Resolution 86-140, as it was amended on January 14, 1987 by Resolution No. 87--08, initiating proceedings for annexation of the territory as shown on Exhibit "A" and described in Exhibit "B" (attached and made a part hereof) to the City. SECTION 2: The Council hereby determines that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and i zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. SECTION 3: The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests favorable action by the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary s Commission. - PAGE 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87- SECTION 4: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Resolution with the Commission at once. PASSED: This day of 1987. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard 1w/4486A f'- :}'t cF 4 PAGE 2 RESOLUTION NO. 87— .� I�tti r C_t.;► �.,.,. /t■Il,lov �� ■ mak.-, -� ;afro`'�- ` a��. a �=�, "'� �� ::� Vii,.�.�;a= ~°�i�' �� � � \■I ' =:1! ■Ilu. ■��i�iiil F'�'�� Hi = womon ,IJ familial's7� 1. ?� ■1�1 rL a a!� i r/� - r ■�� �1■ 111 wl ■r ♦ . r r as 10 In 5 ■tl■ Elilot � MIC til �_.��6 �1 _ �..a 1�'���, _ X1.1 .1■■ U. I�a �, a tu{ 4 _ WOMEN ME =01I tills memo all I HIM n . 7 rra r �{ • 1■ 11.1 ■ 0Itel• HR No [ �"��� ri� ill nl■ all j 0.81 ■til•■ ■1.: •i •It,� :iii ����,� � w,r�;,�� � IN S . si !, . ,.�r. ■ A �= i r� ,LJ ; urr'9t�!Ino �. .. 111 �;■ • r■ ■w �/. �,dr.,,:r.,..iJ�;a�l�uLun �t 1• �.. ■.- 111. :a� .rte L��z-;,��rr c������. � .1{SIV■■i moi, Ur■1 `■"�i ■■ r� rl■� rn� I 4 s, n i 1r .. r■a■ r a■ ur �z MR ■r,. �'..., WIN '"'l i rrx Iu ism Is. not goals .,5 �, Ra1ir��ii�■.�� Ilii:t' T�f t ti;��. ��' +"� � r �Iil!■/I�ttlf~ it;: ani. Z. _ r� , .ion 1f ng� IN �� III/Y�i l.. r.a. ■ui' Yilf�In �. ^� _u-anJ t 4 L iV��,� {��■ X1111 /Now i - i '-� rrrr ■r 7ii11 omit.s�•'IP 1 _ _ '' �T■s� IIIA+�ii1�a,u�'t■��.� only I f ■ . �, j ,� ■L r,a tii.�H 1■■ lkit ��• Zm '�j 8 EXHIBIT ':�►" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION PURPOSES ONLY That portion of land located in Sections 26, 35, and 36. Township 1 South, range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning on the centerline of S.W. Greenburg Road (County Road 2472) at its intersection with the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 4, Ashbrook Farm, a•recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said point of beginning being on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard; thence North 880 10' East on the south line of Lots 4 and 5, said Ashbrook Farm, 850 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of said Lot 5 and the centerline of S.W. 95th Ave. (county road No. 1018); thence on said centerline North 070 17' East 125 feet, to the intersection with a westerly extension of the south line of that tract conveyed to Jack D. Godwin, et ux, by deed recorded in Book 443, Page 186, Washington County Deed records; thence South 880 25' East on the south line of said Godwin tract 205.05 feet to the southeast corner thereof; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, and on the east line of said Godwin tract North 000 38' West, 140.3 feet to the south_ line of that tract conveyed to John 0. Wick, et ux, b; deed recorded in Book 468, Page 261, Washington County Deed records; thence on the south line of e said Wick tract South 880 25' East, 105.57 feet to a point on the east line of Lot 17, said Ashbrook Farm, (said point bears South 000 04' East 205.45 feet from the northeast corner of said Lot 17); thence on the east line of said Lot 17, South 000 42' East, 73 feet more or less; thence, continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, North 890 18' East, 73.38 feet; t thence North 000 42' West, 298 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak - PAGE 1 - Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East 400 feet; thence South 223.69 feet to the southeasterly right-of-way line of the abandoned Oregon Electric Railroad; thence, on said southeasterly right-of-may line, South 520 13' West, 553.63 feet to the north line of Lot 18, said Ashbrook Farm; thence, on the north line of Lots 18, 20, and 21, said Ashbrook Farm, South 85' 45' East 895 feet; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, North 000 42' West, 450.5 feet; thence North 890 18' East 100 feet; thence North 000 42' West 190 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 89" 22' East, 110 feet; thence South 000 42' East 190 feet to the southwest corner of that tract conveyed to Terry W. Mills, at ux, recorded in Book 679, Page 146, Washington County Deed records; thence easterly 299.20 feet to the southeast corner of that tract conveyed to James L. Senkel, at ux, as described in Book 548, Page 67, Washington County Deed Records; thence North on the east line of said Senkel tract and a northerly extension thereof, 190 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East 180 feet to an angle point thereon; thence continuing of the existing city limit of Lhe City of Tigard northeasterly 30 feet; thence, leaving said north right-of-way line, easterly 65 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block :53, Metzger Acre Tracts, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said corner being on the south line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence South 000 07' East on the east lines of Lots 12 and 13, said Ashbrook Farm, 375 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of that tract conveyed to Peter O. Juve, at ux, as described in Book 333, Page 353, Washington County Deed Records; thence West, on the north line of said Juve tract, 266.24 feet to the northwest corner thereof; thence on the west line of said Juve tract and the west line of the Clarence A. Cole, at ux, tract as described in Book 334, Page 91, Washington County Deed Records, South PAGE 2 - 000 07' East 327.23 feet to the re-entry corner in the west line of said Cole tract; thence West, on the boundary of said Cole tract, 184.26 feet to the most westerly northwest corner thereof; thence South 000 07' East, on the west line of said Cole tract 69.26 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 947); thence West on said north right-of-way line, 25 feet, more or less, to the west right-of-way line of S.W. 89th Avenue; thence South 000 17' West, on said west right--of—gray line, 504.4 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 36, Graham Acres, a recorded Plat, Washington County Plat records; thence South 890 07' East 475.70 feet to the west line of said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence, continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, South 000 17' West on the east line of the D.C. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52, 291.05 feet; thence South 880 42' East 295.62 feet to the center of S.W. Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947); thence on the centerline of S.W. Hall Boulevard, South 000 50' West, 74.75 feet to the intersection with an easterly extension of the south line of Lot 10, ' Block 0, said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence westerly, on the south line of said Lot 10, 294.8 feet more or less, to the east line of the said Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52; thence southerly, on said east line, 380 feet, more or less to the intersection with the northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217; thence southeasterly, on said northeast right-of-way line and a southeasterly extension thereof '(said line being the existing city limit of the City of Tigard) 420 feet, more or less, to the intersection of a westerly extension of the south right-of-way line of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence easterly, on said south right-of-way line and the extension thereof, 260 feet, more or less, to the east line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim No. 53; thence southerly, on said east line, said line also being the east line of Lot 20, Block O, said Metzger Acre Tracts, 110 Feet more or less to the southeast corner of said Lot 20; thence westerly 75 feet, more or less, on the south line of said Lot 20 to its intersection with the E - PAGE 3 - w. nartheasterly right-of--way line of State Highway No. 217; thence southeasterly, along said northeasterly right-of-way line, 490 feet more or less to the west line of that tract of land conveyed to Arthur W. and Margaret C. Verharen in Book 1062, Page 492, Washington County Deed Records; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard North 000 36' West 430 feet, more or less, to the centerline of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence on said centerline South 890 48" East approximately 208 feet to a northerly extension of the east line of that tract conveyed to J.C. Peterson, et ux, by deed recorded in Book 142, Page 59, Washington County Deed Records; thence North 13' 20' West 25 feet, more or less, on said northerly extension to the intersection with a westerly extension of the north right-of-way line (said north line being parallel with, and 25 feet north of the centerline) of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence easterly, on said north line of S.W. Pfaffle Street, 1080 feet, more or less, to its Ic intersection with the east line of Friendly Acres, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence northerly, on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, 1347 feet, more or less, to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence on said north line South 890 02' East, 55.8 feet; thence North 000 17' East, 108.10 feet to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 929); thence on said south line North 890 56' 09" East 147 feet to the east right-of-way line of S.W. 78th Avenue; thence on said east line on a 15 foot radius curve concave to the southeast 23.47 feet; thence continuing on said east right-of-way line South 000 17' West, 123.54 feet; thence North 890 56' 09" East, 100 feet; thence South 000 17' West, 85 feet; thence North 890 56' 09" East, 37.76 feet; thence South 000 17' West 175.63 feet; thence South 890 16' 58" East 206.6 feet; thence South 000 11' West 1062.3 feet; thence East, parallel with and 25 feet L xs' north of the centerline of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975) 140 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the north right-of-way line of State - PAGE 4 Highway 99 West; thence East along said north line 130 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the northwest right-of-way line of State Highway 99 West; thence North 540 East, on said north right-of-way line, 530 feet, more or less; thence North 000 29' East 493.54 feet; thence South 890 East, 192.0 feet; thence North 000 12' East, 100 feet; thence South 890 10' East, 20.60 feet; thence North 000 12' East, 450.6 feet to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence South 880 03' 10" East, 15 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of Block "B" said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence North 125.8 feet on the west line of said Block "B" to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 929); thence East on said south line 700.65 feet to a point which is 60 feet west of the centerline of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road No. 1080); thence South 138.5 feet; thence East 30 feet, more or less, to the west right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue, thence on said west right-of-way line on a 316.5 foot radius curve concave to the east, approximately 130 feet to a point of tangency on said west line; thence South 280 57' East, 141.8 feet on said west right-of--way line and its southeasterly extension to the intersection with the northwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 99 West; thence northeasterly on said northwesterly right-of-way and the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, 710 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue (County Road No. 1456); thence North 000 04' West on said east right-of-way line, 375 feet to the intersection with the south right-of-way line of S.W. Pine Street; thence South 890 58' East on said south line 190 feet; thence North 670 36' East, 415.35 feet; thence South, 100 feet; thence North 670 36' East 387.0 feet to the east line of said Section 36 and the existing city limits of the City of Portland; thence North leaving the existing city limits of the City of Tigard, and on said section line, 525 feet, more or less, to the most easterly southeast corner of Citadel Estates, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North 890 18' - PAGE 5 - 10" West, 264 feet; thence South 122.70 feet; thence North 790 02' West, 11.35 feet; thence North 890 16' West, 469.20 feet to the northerly extension of the east line of Block 2, Villa Ridge, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South 000 40' East, 547.70 feet to the north right-of--waY line of S.W. Pine Street; thence North 890 58' West on said north right-of-way line and its westerly extension 250 feet to its intersection with the west right--of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue (County Road 1456); thence South, on said west right-of-way line, 352.20 feet; thence South 720 30' West 198.91 feet; thence North 890 58' West 380 feet to the east right-of-waY line of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road 1080); thence North 000 04' West, on said east right--of-way line, 10.70 feet; thence North 890 48' West, on the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street 4000 feet, more or less to the east right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Blvd. (County Road 1165) said east line being parallel with and 30 feet east of the centerline of said S.W. Hall Blvd.; thence northerly, on said east right-of-way line, 1180 feet more or less to the south right-of-Way line of S.W. Mapleleaf Street; thence East, on said 36.1 feet; thence East 5 feet; thence North south line, 10 feet; thence North 2 .W• Locust Street (County Road 749); 146.1 feet to a point of curvature near S concave to the southeast, thence northeasterly, on a 25 foot radius curve n the south right-of line of 39 feet more or less to a point of tangency o said S.W. Locust Street; thence North 70 feet to a point of tangency on the on a north right-of-way line of said S.W. Locust Street; thence northwesterly, 25 foot radius curve concave to the northeast, 39 feet more or less to the east right-of-way line of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence West, 70 feet to the said west west right-of-way line of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence South on ri ht-of-way line, 30 feet to the north right-of-way line of said S.W. Locust 9 Street; thence westerly, on said north right-of-waY line (County Roads 749 and 500 feet, more or less, to the northerly extension of the east 753), thence northerly on said northerly right of-way line of S.W. Jefferson Street; - PAGE 6 - _ r� extension approximately 50 feet to the easterly extension of the north right-of--way line of S.W. Locust Street (County Road 753); thence West, on said easterly extension and said north right-of-way line, approximately 1282 feet to the east line of Lot 2, Block C, Lehmann Acre Tract, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North, on said east line and its northerly extension (being 190.3 feet west of the west right-of--way line of S.W. 92nd Avenue) 1609.2 feet to the south right-of-way line of that public road described in Book 442, page 432, Washington County Deed Records; thence North 890 37' East, 25 feet; thence North 122.9 feet; thence North 890 37' East 20 feet, thence North 010 04' West on said east right-of-way line, approximately 330 feet to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Blvd. , (County Road 1165); thence northwesterly, on said south right-of-way line, approximately 1160 feet; thence South 010 03' West 333 feet; thence North 870 27'12" West, 961.08 feet; thence North 010 07' West 301.5 feet; thence North 89" 41' West, approximately 750 feet to the east right-of-sway line of State Highway No. 217 and the existing city limit of the City of Beaverton; thence continuing on said existing city limit and the east right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217, southerly 1700 feet, more or less, to a point common to the city limits of the City of Tigard and the City of Beaverton (said point being approximately 660 feet north of the south line of said Section 26); thence southeasterly, on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard and the east right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217, 2750 feet, more or less to the intersection with the centerline of SW Greenburg Road (County Road 2472), thence southwesterly, on said centerline, 635 feet more or less, to the point of beginning, containing approximately 390 acres. JF:sb/2890P - PAGE 7 - OPTION B CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REAFFIRMING THE DECEMBER 29, 1986, REQUEST TO THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO ANNEX AN AREA REFERRED TO AS "SOUTH METZGER" AND FURTHER REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THAT ANNEXATION -------- WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to receive public testimony regarding the proposal South Metzger Annexation; and WHEREAS, the Council initiation process is being used since the triple-majority annexation process was recently challenged in the Oregon Court of Appeals and the triple-majority process is still being questioned; and WHEREAS, at that meeting much testimony was received that indicated the hearing notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens in the area were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council passed Resolution No. 86-140 at the 12/29/86 meeting forwarding the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission for a hearing on 2/12/87; and WHEREAS the Tigard City Council also called for another public hearing to be held 1/14/87 to offer additional opportunity for public testimony; and WHEREAS, participants at the public hearing noted the different areas of improved and unimproved street right-of-way along SW Spruce Street; and WHEREAS, at the 1/14/87 hearing Council reconsidered the boundary of the proposed annexation area along Spruce Street and voted to request the Boundary Commission consider a modification to the original annexation request based on service delivery concerns addressed by participants in the hearing. WHEREAS, the City Council further determined that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18. 138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code- and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Council hereby reaffirms Resolution 86-140, <-as=,-t -was aWwnd '1F '}rggT,:<:by-- 'Rs�iat3ori ' 8?-QB initiating proceedings for annexation of the territory described therein to the City. SECTION 2: The Council hereby determines that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments PAGE 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87- ng and thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planni zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. SECTION 3: The Tigard City Council additionally requests the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission consider a modification to the proposal along SW Spruce Street as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", described on the attached Exhibit "B", both being made a part hereof. This modification request is responsive to the comments received during the hearings regarding unimproved portions of SW Spruce Street yet allows service delivery to those areas which are improved. SECTION 4: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Resolution with the Commission at once. PASSED: This day of 1987. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard lwl4486A PAGE Z > RESOLUTION NO, 87— t'��iii•}1 �r�+►�� luulf �` 1f I� It■,�fu: tet.. -�N�R � _ �+ ' `� - - r�� /�■■■Ifil� �� i It - - T'{ — v'>;' ., WINit r am Ion! I'�11M11�1�• !� x ` �n1. "� i - r }1tr •Ia• ra._ loll �► yt-qtr.■*• �_ r ■- err :r ■!♦ Cr f�11+ MM\�t:��� 'Lott C� /� t....(. ■■■ fir' /, ��UII■�■n..L/. - : '!�!�: .:11 ■sem; 31u�t/�'1tl" � � c `j - _ ,1!!: a:: 1111 �i,■ ,�::" ' �Z',. 11111/1/1 717,1L , �� �!: ����111�- Vii// ���■�Er ■r. #1 malls rME l�, �' ►..• ~' = MINE *• • .. _ �■ -til s� �■st r■ _ w i � ����/' We M IM -;I main ♦ — s Aivim Is Ell: :ll: :.: ■:1 .11.. . _� ar } •• Zlt al- miss • _ IIL: :IS: LI:ism �nitlir�4il�r`r��.�,: tr.� �� �i ■/. i ■111 � �L �■■ -.. -- — --= .. a a ■t __ rl _ ■was■ ■1:�� ■I�t11//■■/lrl i,�ai ■.� n1� r ■r �� Ism mmum Elm wC Oro �1/. ■ti.■ _ _■ �' ����_so �� is . sac :NJ2 1: ... r ��� Is ME ro MR 71 ■r� — i� nitt� ' tt_• � I . M US Mar. will i -12 t�'� 1 .■�� !1�� IM illi M 11 LM �nf. v - • .•� MOM slow— me ■a► a MEN �► �- tll4 �rttr� il� ��� _HIM mom MIMI MallMall11 !� .► I r: OPTION B EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION PURPOSES ONLY That portion of land located in Sections 26, 35, and 36, Township 1 South, range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning on the centerline of S.W. Grecalurg Road (County Road 2472) at its intersection with the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 4, Ashbrook Farm, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said point of beginning being on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard; thence North 88° 10' East on the south line of Lots 4 and 5, said Ashbrook Farm, 850 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of said Lot 5 and the centerline of S.W. 95th Ave. (county road No. 1018); thence on said centerline North 070 17' East 125 feet, to the intersection with a westerly extension of Lhe south line of that tract conveyed to Jack D. Godwin, et ux, by deed recorded in Book 443, Page 186, Washington County Deed records; thence South 880 25' East on the south line of said Godwin tract 205.05 feet to the southeast corner thereof; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, and on the east line of said Godwin tract North 000 : 38' West, 140_3 feet to the south line of that tract conveyed to John O. Wick, et ux, by deed recorded in Book 468, Page 261, Washington County Deed records; thence on the south line of said Wick tract South 880 25' East, 105.57 feet to a point on the east line of Lot 17, said Ashbrook Farm, (said point bears South 000 04' East 205.45 feet from the northeast corner of said Lot 17); thence on the east line of said Lot 17, South 000 42' East, 73 feet more or less; thence, continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, North 890 18' East, 73.38 feet; — PAGE 1 — thence North 000 42' West, 298 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East 400 feet; thence South 223.69 feet to the southeasterly right-of-+gay line of the abandoned Oregon Electric Railroad; thence, on said southeasterly right-of-way line, South 520 13' West, 553.63 feet to the north lane of Lot 18, said Ashbrook Farm; thence, on the north line of Lots 18, 20, and 21, said Ashbrook Farm, South 850 45' East 895 feet; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, North 000 42' West, 450.5 feet; thence North 890 18' East 100 feet; thence North 000 42' West 190 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 221• East, 110 feet; thence South 000 42' East 190 feet to the southwest corner of that tract conveyed to Terry W. Mills, at ux, recorded in Book 679, Page 146, Washington County Deed records; thence easterly 299.20 feet to the southeast corner of that tract conveyed to James L. Senkel, at ux, as described in Book 548, Page 67, Washington County Deed Records; thence North on the east line of said Senkel tract and a northerly extension thereof, 190 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence on said north line North 890 22' East 180 feet to an angle point thereon; thence continuing of the existing city limit of the City of Tigard northeasterly 30 feet; thence, leaving said north right-of-way line, easterly b5 feet, :more or leas,• to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 53, Metzger Acre Tracts, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said corner being on the south line of S.W. Oak Street (County Road No. 823); thence South 000 07' East on the east lines of Lots 12 and 13, said Ashbrook Farm, 375 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of that tract conveyed to Peter O. Juve, at ux, as described in Book 333, Page 353, Washington County Deed Records; thence West, on the north line of said Juve tract, 266.24 feet to the -s - PAGE 2 - northwest corner thereof; thence on the west line of said Juve tract and the west line of the Clarence A. Cole, et ux, tract as described ;n Book 334, Page 91, Washington County Deed Records, South 000 07' East 327.23 feet to the re-entry corner in the west line of said Cole tract; thence West, on the boundary of said Cole tract, 184.26 feet to the most westerly northwest corner thereof; thence South 000 07' East, on the west line of said Cole tract 69.26 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 947); thence West on said north right-of--way line, 25 feet, more or less, to the west right-of-way line of S.W. 89th Avenue; thence South 000 17' West, on said west right-of-way line, 504.4 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 36, Graham Acres, a recorded Plat, Washington County Plat records; thence South 890 07' East 475.70 feet to the west line of said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence, continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, South 000 17' West on the east line of the D.C. Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52, 291.05 feet; thence South 880 42' East 295.62 feet to the center of S.W. Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947); thence on the centerline of S.W. Hall Boulevard, South 000 50' West, 74.75 feet to the intersection with an easterly extension of the south line of Lot 10, Block 0, said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence westerly, on the south line of said Lot 10, 294.8 feet more or less, to the east line of the said Graham Donation Land Claim No. 52; thence southerly, on said east line, 380 feet, more or less to the intersection with the northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217; thence southeasterly, on said northeast right-of-way line and a southeasterly extension thereof (said line being the existing city limit of the City of Tigard) 420 feet, more or less, to the intersection of a westerly extension of the south right-of-way line of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence easterly, on said south right-of-way line and the extension thereof, - PAGE 3 - 260 feet, more or less, to the east line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim No. 53; thence southerly, on said east line, said line also being the east line of Lot 20, Block O, said Metzger Acre Tracts, 110 feet more or less to the southeast corner of said Lot 20; thence westerly 75 feet, more or less, on the south line of said Lot 20 to its intersection with the northeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 217; thence southeasterly, along said northeasterly right-of-way line, 490 feet more or less to the west line of that tract of land conveyed to Arthur W. and Margaret C. Verharen in Book 1062, Page 492, Washington County Deed Records; thence continuing on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard North 000 36' West 430 feet, more or less, to the centerline of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence on said centerline South 890 48" East approximately 208 feet to a northerly extension of the east line of that tract conveyed to J.C. Peterson, at ux, by deed recorded in Book 142, Page 59, Washington County Deed Records; thence ' North 130 20' West 25 feet, more or less, on said northerly extension to the intersection with a westerly extension of the north right-of-way line (said north line being parallel with, and 25 feet north of the centerline) of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975); thence easterly, on said north line of S.W. Pfaffle Street, 1080 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the east line of Friendly Acres, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence northerly, on the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, 1347 .feat, more or less, to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence on said north line South 890 02' East, 55.8 feet; thence North 000 17' East, 108.10 feet to the south right-of--way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 929); thence on said south line North 890 56' 09" East 147 feet to the east right-of-sway line of S.W. 78th Avenue; thence on said east line on a 15 foot radius curve concave to the southeast 23.47 feet; thence - PAGE 4 - A continuing on said east right-of-way line South 006 17' West, 123.54 feet; thence North 890 56' 09" East, 100 feet; thence South 000 17' West, 85 feet; thence North 890 56' 09" East, 37.76 feet; thence South 006 17' West 175.63 feet; thence South 890 16' 58" East 206.6 feet; thence South 000 11' West 1062.3 feet; thence East, parallel with and 25 feet north of the centerline of S.W. Pfaffle Street (County Road No. 975) 140 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the north right-of-way line of State Highway 99 West; thence North 540 East, on said north right-of-way line, 530 feet, more or less; thence North 000 29' East 493.54 feet; thence South 890 East, 192.0 feet; thence North 000 12' East, 100 feet; thence South 890 10' East, 20.60 feet; thence North 000 12' East, 450.6 feet to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence South 8810 03' 10" East, 15 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of Block "B" said Metzger Acre Tracts; thence North 125.8 feet on the west line of said Block "B" to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road No. 929); thence East on said south line 700.65 feet to a point which is 60 feet west of the centerline of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road No. 1080); thence South 138.5 feet; thence East 30 feet, more or less, to the west right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue; thence on said west right-of-way line on a 316.5 foot radius curve concave to the east, approximately 130 feet to a point of tangency on said west line; thence South 280 57' East, 141.8 feet on said west right-of-way line and its southeasterly extension to the intersection with the northwesterly y 99 West; thence northeasterly on said right-of-way line of State Highwa northwesterly right-of-way and the existing city limit of the City of Tigard, 710 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue (County Road No. 1456); thence North 000 04' West on said east right-of-way line, 375 feet to the intersection with the south - PAGE 5 - kv; t s right-of-way line of S.W. Pine Street; thence South 890 58' East on said south line 190 feet; thence North 670 36' East, 415.35 feet; thence South, 100 feet; thence North 670 36' East 387.0 feet to the east line of said Section 36 and the existing city limits of the City of Portland; thence North leaving the existing city limits of the City of Tigard, and on said section line, 525 feet, more or less, to the most easterly southeast corner of Citadel Estates, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North 890 18' 10" West, 264 feet; thence South 122.70 feet; thence North 790 02' West, 11.35 feet; thence North 890 16' West, 469.20 feet to the northerly extension of the wast line of Block 2, Villa Ridge, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South 000 40' East, 547.70 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Pine Street; thence North 890 58' West on said north right--of-way line and its westerly extension 250 feet to its intersection with the west right-of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue (County Road 1456); thence South, on said west right-of-way line, 352.20 feet; thence South 720 30' West 198.91 feet; thence North 890 58' West 380 feet to the east right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road 1080); thence North 000 04' West, on said east right-of-way line, 10.70 feet; thence North 890 48' West, on the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street 2060 feet, more or less, to the northerly extension of the west line of Block "F" Metzger Acre Tracts, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South 000 17' West, 168.10 feet to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence North 890 03' West on said north line 1665 feet more or less to the Northwest Corner of said George Richardson D.L.C. No. 55; thence South 000 11' West on the west line of said Donation Land Claim, 150.55 feet; thence North 890 06' West, 84.5 feet; thence North 000 ii' East, 110 feet; thence North 890 06' West, 184.40 feet to the east right-of-way line of S.W. all - PAGE 6 - r Blvd. (County Road 1165); thence North 00° 11' East on said east right-of-way line and its northerly extension 173.23 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road 947); thence South 890 58' West on said north right-of-way line 25 feet more or less to the east right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Blvd. (County Road 1165); said east line being parallel with and 30 feet east of the centerline of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence northerly, on said east right-of-way line, 1180 feet more or less to the south right-of-way line of S.W. Mapleleaf Street; thence East, on said south line, 10 feet; thence North 236.1 feet; thence East 5 feet; thence North 146.1 feet to a point of curvature near S.W. Locust Street (County Road 749); thence northeasterly, on a 25 foot radius curve concave to the southeast, 39 feet more or less to a point of tangency on the south right-of-way line of said S.W. Locust Street; thence North 70 feet to a point of tangency on the north right-of--way line of said S.W. Locust Street, thence northwesterly, on a 25 foot radius curve concave to the northeast, 39 feet more or less to the east right-of-way line of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence West, 70 feet to the west right-of-way line of said S.W. Hall Blvd. ; thence South on said west right-of-way line, 30 feet to the north right-of-way line of said S.W. Locust Street; thence westerly, on said north right-of--way line (County Roads 749 and 753), 500 feet, more or less, to the northerly extension of the east right-of-way line of S.W. Jefferson Street; thence northerly on said northerly extension approximately 50 feet to the easterly extension of the north right-of-way line of S.W. Locust Street (County Road 753); thence West, on said easterly extension and said north right-of-way line, approximately 1282 feet to the east line of Lot 2, Block C, Lehmann Acre Tract, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North, on said east line and its northerly extension (being 190.3 feet west of the west right-of-way line of S.W. 92nd Avenue) 1609.2 feet - PAGE 7 - line of that public road described in Book 442. Page to the south right-of-waY ° 37, East, 25 feet; Deed Records: thence North 89 432, Washington County thence North 010 t; the Mort 122.9 fee h 89° 37' East 20 feet: thence North approximately 330 feet to the south line. 04' West on said east right-of- 14a 1165); thence S.W. Hall Blvd.. (County Road right-of-way line of 1160 feet; line, approximately northwesterly, on said south right-Of" 'Y ° 27'12" West, 961.08 feet; thence South 01° 03' West 333 feet; thence North 87 � t 301.5 feet; thence North 890 AI' West4 approximate he ° O7 Wes No. 217 and thence North 01 line of State Highway ht--of--way on said 750 feet to the east rig thence continuing existing city limit of the City of Beaverton. and the east right-of-way .line of State Hi9 "y No. 217, existing city limit limits of the - to a point common to the city southerly 1700 feet. more or leas, int being approximately 660 of Tigard and the City of Beaverton (said Po on the City thence southeasterly, t north of the south line of said Section 26)% right-Of-way line of fee and the east existing city limit of the City of Tigard 217, 2750 feet, more or less to the in with the State Highway N°. on Greenburg Road (County Road 2472); thence southwesterly, centerline Of SW to the point of beginning$ containing e, 635 feet more or said centerlinless, approximately 385 acres. 1F:cn/2823p/0024P R 71 IP _._ PAGE 8 - E 4 AW r OPTION C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 87— A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REAFFIRMING THE DECEMBER 29, 1986, REQUEST TO THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO ANNEX AN AREA REFERRED TO AS "SOUTH METZGER" AND FURTHER REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THAT ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to receive public testimony regarding the proposal South Metzger Annexation; and WHEREAS, the Council initiation process is being used since the triple—majority annexation process was recently challenged in the Oregon Court of Appeals and the triple—majority process is still being questioned; and WHEREAS, at that meeting much testimony was received that indicated the hearing notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens in the area were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice; and WHEREAS, further noted by some residents along Spruce Street was the desire to not be annexed with an indication that this area was not within Precinct 192; said precinct voting to join the City at the 11/4/86 election; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council passed Resolution No. 86-140 at the 12/29/86 meeting forwarding the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission for a hearing on 2/12/87; and WHEREAS the Tigard City Council also called for another public hearing to be held 1/14/87 to offer additional opportunity for public testimony; and WHEREAS, at the 1/14/87 hearing Council reconsidered the boundary of the proposed annexation area in the Spruce Street vicinity and voted to request the Boundary Commission consider a modification to the original annexation request. This request would be responsive to the negative comments received from the citizens within Precinct #27 and would pull back the boundary in this area to the Precinct #192 northerly boundary line. WHEREAS, the City Council further determined that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger—Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Council hereby reaffirms Resolution 86-140, ak itatas-aiot8#ti � initiating proceedings or annexation of the territory described therein to the City. SECTION 2: The Council hereby determines that the area to be annexed will be z � designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the —Progress Community Plan zoning and Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger PAGE 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87— comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. SECTION 3: The Tigard City Council additionally requests the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission consider a, modification to the proposal. This request would be responsive to the negative comments received from the citizens within Precinct 027 and would pull back the boundary threa t . andhe ecinct #192 described onrtherlatta hedry line Exhibit s'e", both hown on the attached Exhibit o�•ed being made a part hereof. §ECTION 4: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Resolution with the Commission at once. PASSED: This _ day of . :1987. -..Mayor , City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder — ,City of Tigard ' lw/4486A PAGE 2 RESOLUTION NO 87— �„,. . is .� � r,• ♦rl AU � �•��. � .t... :yf1r'�' .!;� II///1111/1��=+���iil'i.wE.� n■■ rI I1■x'71. Arun♦ r(4r piM1/ ■T'l�M tons an i off till I I �R�■-■�H .�„ ��� �1�� ■ .It 1 , t► �1 `�i�= Ott ww /�:i Foll. ISM111!M._- nn tllu..l .Aup :. ® A ♦ r - ���' .w,: ��'�Il�n IIiiI1111i.1:11J�1■.;.SII■�I _�, �� 'ti �►�, ..����I111 ■ut/t :_.rtt� •.�_ jar, . .. .: - .�.� � r■Jim �t112.','L'J ` � — ���- �/6�{1. .■ �m.•L �■ JPR/�Allf�l�it lll•���� t■1■�+ =^! rr■ It. r�i . r■r i� ICA %loxre WIN/Pam ���!■T����. .... ,rr �! .111. - `...■ ••stale •I all milk ..■�. .ullt itG tw+�'`'i• 1111111111 ' �I, mug :1{IIt � .:r. rr+! ���• 111�111�� T■tr �L■. +■ JrWIMP u .■ arrl '. P!iire,�'s� rs r. iJrutrr,rt x11111111^ [ 1111 :IIIlf/1// �NtE ! K ■1�!l1 = a �j+�/ i.. `._.� s. , .�, I li i��li :filll!��� r : �■i� : ���` N'r��i`r ;11 r■ ■Ll ►uE ' 1frr +It/► - ■■ r■ '!/ '! /!�: nn■r� mess ■ most ■w E ' X1111: :111! bill■ '■IL rpt H11".. ..fill■t !� A/■ / - �_■I 111. 1 ■'° •tiA:■ :IJ1! : flit{': ■ illlLl -" �r 11■11 IC��ri 1�.-�SII[ ■�:';�r Al��y• ling a r 1 r r '11 l . Arlt 1/i� .11 Lf' ■��r ■w s[� I,I!'•t' .��`��►Ai��i ■ii :11 11 IIIo t '•. f .. rrt.•' •��'��• . ,,. .... ' 111, ■11 >_Itl■ 1ii111 ILII >✓,. .., ..� ;';«1 • ' '; `,� .■ ;� ! 11■11 ICEwI� ■: ■I��t■ (' •�+1 .n�■��� � ,:� �i- .1.. ,l/rl{ IMM. 1■ "II:F ■�' :111: '' 1 � p an r,, ,y�)l � �:�i ���I� ■aw�'ttlFltl�llr-.��►y � [. I - ' � r�r�L [f )[ ■� � '■I��F�I,I�IIIf _ y_ - i //oss all Ilr LllW, .IFi q; � ` I :tl ' i`4t n'i• ;;1 r ' C;i. ' 7 II I 1 ■ , �i/,� __ �,. ri� ■■ � �. 1¢ i rtY ii -'1 .■ ■1� 1 .+It y y �; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON OPTION C RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REAFFIRMING THE DECEMBER 29, 1986, REQUEST TO THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO ANNEX AN AREA REFERRED TO AS "SOUTH METZGER" AND FURTHER REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THAT ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 29, 1986 to receive public testimony regarding the proposal South Metzger Annexation; and WHEREAS, the Council initiation process is being used since the triple-majority annexation process was recently challenged in the Oregon Court of Appeals and the triple-majority process is still being questioned; and WHEREAS, at that meeting much testimony was received that indicated the hearing notice was delayed due to heavy holiday mail and citizens in the area were vacationing and unable to respond adequately to the notice; and WHEREAS, further noted by some residents along Spruce Street was the desire to not be annexed with an indication that this area was not within Precinct 192; said precinct voting to join the City at the 11/4/86 election; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council passed Resolution No. 86-140 at the 12/29/86 meeting forwarding the annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission for a hearing on 2/12/87; and WHEREAS the Tigard City Council also culled for another public hearing to be held 1/14/87 to offer additional opportunity for public testimony; and WHEREAS, at the 1/14/87 hearing Council reconsidered the boundary of the proposed annexation area in the Spruce Street vicinity and voted to request the Boundary Commission consider a modification to the original annexation request. This request would be responsive to the negative comments received from the citizens within Precinct #27 and would pull back the boundary in this area to the Precinct #192 northerly boundary line. WHEREAS, the City Council further determined that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Council hereby reaffirms Resolution 86-140, as it was amended on January 14, 1987 by Resolution No. 87-08, initiating proceedings for annexation of the territory described therein to the City. inn SECTION 2: The Council hereby determines that the area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in conformance with Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The MetzgerL-Progress Community Plan zoning and -� PAGE 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87- comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279, and 280, and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conformance with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised Statute requirements. SECTION 3: The Tigard City Council additionally requests the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission consider a modification to the proposal. This request would be responsive to the negative comments received from the citizens within Precinct 027 and would pull back the boundary in this area to the Precinct #192 northerly boundary line as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", and described on the attached Exhibit "B", both being made a part hereof. SECTION 4: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Resolution with the Commission at once. PASSED: This day of . . 1987• Mayor — City of Tigard '' s ATTEST: City Recorder — City of Tigard lw/4486A y, PAGE 2 RESOLUTION NO. 87- I • • / ■r s IIIII�. s"kia,riIran sells— an . loan mow r�yrl?+Y1r •"1111"n 11■ yl■ ♦ � 117 �/n■.'1 ��r 1 .��1 48 rii � � �♦`; ■.� . ■ ►•+`�•1..tt11�:� nn X11■i1t■1 �Ai. !1► .. N ♦S / MINI ALNEW. .,.� 111 > 1 :1� I • _ILLI f �� ��^■ - • 111■lltlllri ■ �' +�� ,�� �1 \i►� .�����111 ■ ilTmom� �N� �- ■ ■ 111' ■LJ - roll. .■ 192 ■ ■Jl�ir - �, .. f p1�r�ANISMI /A■ :1I . ��■1''�� Ilr 11 = �� C �r/ r ► ' � �►�� �� � :�;.r1 . mammal[ a--for, ..� 71 ■,fl�� ....,,. S• �11�!11111 �i- r n r '( i r;'-_._ t►i+ Z �■' ■.0 ra ■.IIS■ :HIII lira �r'.�"r M•� u' kMCI aall wor WTIGARD AREA OF INTEREST OF sew o' 't-, .. ter.n+� iI 1111111111 9, • ,�_+,� _ .■ "IEt![ .111Ur'.� ' /r •: 111l111 � r .i :r ;r^i aiii '.w _ /111 IN J1 -•f114 11111'■ r'IInIN.W, � "`• ■. nu= AV I1::'w;"^ me r ■y r .■��■s t �� • � '• y we ■. .. .. ... 1111111111 .«1111/.11 .«11t.:.1, .. .:-.. ■ ■■tum [ .. <. I:' 111111M�/�� 1111: :1111! itlll■ NJ log w -tM11I1G ...1 � Hill ill ■1 A �'� � ' 8 11! - •ii•■ MAP :1111: ■L■ gill }11J 4' : .. • I .. � Y._,,;� •: I�En illll r: :lilltl '."_-11,y 11111111MUM! ...i■ y ` ► 11:: 1111111111111 11111: �:,1111/t■ T17 � t■ t ta111� tt 1111-t. ♦���t ■■�� � --... - ' ■ii : [iil.i '.Prli. ■IL1E ■ _ ■�' � I` I,t{i'•t .*��•:r�►�•' —'; 111 11■r • afn s ■ III■ 11111111111mill ■111111 ' l r-a� • � � ' - ,"' " 'llllil ;! ILII I�F!�I ■: �1��Y/ c,! sent �• t-< `. ";' ' Al ■iiil alt;♦= ��"- �'■i11;: /� 1111• •umiluuu� �' _ 1 �j �� � : ,'•', � V.. j. '�� �I a �ry�a i` - �' it � i � `• �� .. lirmoms. ftYuttst►` � , 11.•1`-• �� �+IAC I t t��■I . i. i ! ■..1 � r ` �_wl•�� � i �'� 1 f i rt l:- `�• ra 1 II!` i �r � . Y �� �, •tlh �����■ u—"s. Hell t 1 �i�_,,,,11.\ �r _:r i j' r t■ � Il.i � •■ ■ ■ ��I�llll�■ _el:___ ___ _— ! 1� :_:�.:' ■Icy an= i_�. 4 ai ' 1 .`t i�• f1� 1 �nfiI� ,:� 1111' / I■■ ■ ` syr r �r�tt'd.. t,i --t. • / 11 J� ���i �:��� ,� ■. ■� fir■.■. �{�■■rr► �ti� „r' � �' ■ �/ rl �� 1'��N� sip IN � or,: now� �1:=. ► 111 .►. �� �" �E i� iL! �G r orf-��I�!' ■���► � tr" . �', • 1, „���^^e� r■ - Or ���' �_ L■ �rlri{� «sir /x r+c r Exhibit "B" DRAFT Those tracts of land located in Section 36, T1S, R1W, W.M., Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Parcel I Beginning at the northwest corner of Block "B" Metzger Acre Tracts, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said point of beginning being on the south right-of-way line of S.W. Spruce Street (County Road 929); thence South, on the west line of said Block "B", 125.8 feet to the north line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence North 89000' West, on said north line, 1130 feet, more or less, to the east right-of-way line of S.W. 78th Avenue; thence North 00017' East on said east right-of-way line, 85 feet more or less to a point of curvature thereon; thence northeasterly on a 15-foot radius curve concave to the southeast 23.47 feet to the south right-of--way line of S.W. Spruce Street; thence North 89056'09" East, on said south right-of-way line, 1120 feet more or less, to the point of beginning, containing approximately 3 acres. Parcel II Beginning at the initial point of Villa Ridge, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said initial point being on the east right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue (County Road 1080), and on the south line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim No. 53; thence North 89001' East, on said south Donation Land Claim line, 390 feet more or less to the north right-of-way line of State Highway 99 West; thence northeasterly on said north right-of-way line, 210 feet more or less to the west right-of-way line of S.W. 69th Avenue; thence North on said west right-of-way line 116.32 feet; thence South 72030' West 198.91 feet to the south line of Lot 2, Block 4, said Villa Ridge; thence West on said south line and its westerly extension, 380 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 4, said Villa Ridge and the east right-of-way line of S.W. 71st Avenue; thence South 00004' East, on said east right-of-way line, 187.8 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 2.25 acres. Parcel III Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 1, Villa Ridge No. 2, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records, said southeast corner being on the Willamette Meridian; thence North 00030' East, on the Willamette Meridian, 329.70 feet to the easterly extension of the south line of Lot 44, Citadel Estates, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North 89018'10" West 264 feet; thence South 122.70 feet; thence North 79002' West, 11.35 feet; thence North 89016' West, 469.2 feet to the northerly extension of the east line of Block 2, Villa Ridge, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South on said east line, 313.20 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 11, said Villa Ridge No. 2; thence North 82046'30" East, 749.53 feet to the point of beginning, containing approximately 5.3 acres. to off ♦ 4a •. '+ ilA cru 1t//1//11'r .. v �Ill�r■ a rfLr■P+Mt/ 7 . ■err �■aurrl uw,:::a' �, � r\ � t �♦�..., s NamNJ �i i ■tire:■��014� nn all'i�.■t t.Rr. ■ �•.�� ' ' ��� .��": ::= • �Itmilllltl/rV1.ytJltrmoo' _IIrLI t � rt .t� �'�'� "� ' ►�:�►. ,,►!!hili' ."':, -.�_ �����M � ' , �: .� ,: 01 IM" 5,4 n�wt �■■ : E Woo ■ Ass;_ ■r _ �- �_at � �tl/■ :r�: ;utll'lIG ,.,Z�+:M;•�' 1111111111 ltI,;,,�.� 1111111 r, - ► ��.■�s . �,rrn■rte+�� /tttlf IS t t ��ls�. `*r� �\I%,,�`'�"■■r! low �i�.lArw (ta ��■ ti f� ,�IU�a--rfI11F1� � �� [' 1111: Cliltli�■ -.r :.F loom writ', - _� �:r:arrar■_.,n unnnr� s '► {1# :11rs allElflf ..■ ■ ■ a, �1!/= . �■ q �c-�. � I�f111�"'III�ItitiE '� . y It ■a 9r■ ■a1t ■FL:mtrtf tr�s� ■ ■ ■am milli mi1l1�r/�■E� IM11J11I■■:'■111 !..1f1r111!1 ■■Ir� ■ISE "■-'. jr, 161111" • = � � ' ■ . . ■iii . t�Z .11.■�/JI_ .1111.■ ,_ ,� , Salim, �� ; :.; 111171 11111 .�. .. IIr:11�.. ..1■ �1+� ...,,• i ; (: r 5tt : '!IIIc /Ir`t� 111111 t11111111111� ,�-,�Iin/i■ n�tr= ��ryii��i� ` �•. ,_ r , , 1 d:/i: :II/II IIIIi :MhII:Hill :11 1 ■r .,® ■� ■,y� GTI ! „ . .,..�, _` r... ■ ■fl:: S:Iltr i11M/1 till ..�:'.:11 `p l bt—A ;--,'j w�;:" � ��-� iiMl:If11'u `�ilr:'Ilrll l.�i rC ■tll::��'`'r� f 1 _ r'' ♦ ' ■ n . t■ . nw 11'6 1: • MUNI • ` > ` "I' r/111 ItM IIIJ. . Irt� ram �► .. ♦ , i �� }1 ._:.. r t �i I�IUL' 1♦lt! �.r % i� iii ; l if �kart[i6i '��f3 t'`'�✓ �/ �� Itt' .��V' /■ � c"g-{ G€ +a t s`.i. r' t �Y...>• c e�//■r■/.Y t,\ Illi�t .� � �tf'it , '� a��J4,.J.��' �(H4 ;T( [ �t /�"� ;: � � �r '^���I�'.�"w^, \ : 'tti• �:� � Tr• � r.a.C l,.,It l �t t �� ..,�•� l�+ Sol • 1♦� r :Its � S,�s�it�itt �■�i .�.�Y��� 1 i ir (k 1-..yam: 1 i. . ■�lid���I�!II. � t .,■ _ � t�,��} c- an��_�' � �Itr �►• �► !�L:! ;r,�� l rq ; /■ .mail.ttl, rn. ■ —...■, 1-� t1 l � f_I_1.... :'�l� � 1..*11 i/: '1 ;. r: .� u.:.1111■11 _t_T::!�.Iflllliii -fig son n1.:.■ � Ilw itr C:"-1"s':•'�allllliil - `�■1- in-1-1e`N.,1■ ' 4Ir1,1.Ir!i ■■�11�1 .i`I1.1■I1II/IF IM�u was .uq1.■ .,� �.-"'-:G��.rd:t"ill\'�►�i 1IL�I�tApi� t"ll'l1�O1 1„ .• .fa►00 oop,Ur -• "9111111/ ■t1� �- 1•—. .�� # ..11- ��tinl►.. WINISI — —11■1. .... uVa .u.- ■ .•utUn.� li #111111 -' bnuni • � III.anup ln�r.. � .cacti_.�iii -- '�■/■�:119uu-•1111■ / w� . �. ' ��i#11111h :11 � �I>� ,� lllAl::IIL��6118.■ ■11••.L _ :5 11! G*:=-., - :11ME:IIII: (DVC rsl 1�d -Documpn Ktet�f)i LEAL v►-�y Anp sir rpcltpa rpt rpt spa rir rpr rpr III III Ips iit IT] r :,r f97 r� a!1 i t I � � -1 � .� � I i f _ � Tr]_"' � _[! prTrp tpl Ipr rpilipi tp fjr i�L 1i` it r i Ipl tpt th:alr spl tls rpt rpr tpr tit rpt ara s t rpr s t r-It y T � t 'l � NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED _-- ___... .I 2 3 4 _ 5 6 _ 8 9 0 ii 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO �THE QUALITY OF T}£ORIGINAL DRAWING. ---- OE SZ ez cz 9z sz 0z Ez zz 0z 6r B1—Li--9� Sf bl el zl of o' _g_ ® L ._9 .5_._._b S Z i iNrtitnhtn�wtluu�twttxa�utnc�tansl�elr, jpip��[sarttlll rdunllltl�1)! p a _ Il��Ili i -maitCH, I -- EXHIBIT 3.1 t M M \`moi , i �1��I f�i!• I �> I uL_ off`- ---- ��' V&4ttingconcounty III CAR 1 4 �L_.1�'! GA DEN' ILHO _��_! t «a/" RO.I :I a, and T f fatlSpDi iati0 ' . ,:. I, .) ( f Department of Land Use ._'� ...�: �/�.�6olj-a%,.-=;,•. „ I.� I( - - ^Z' ; it �� . ! " • �I.I 6«FFewOn � LEGEND C- II =\`, �I J" _ L (-,, Basin Boundary —_ ml • i ' , �ces FEMr rsoL— •17A'i:.�i;y�_..—__.I_._... ._ i jr---..i�- (--- +.+�- Geek Channel - FERRY RD I� '1 y Jam- JIJ`;`_� - 1 Ab ndoneC R.R.Grade ICEnwRCRF6r i OARCREST ST i J�i li L CE •�I _7- L_ .. ( LJ I -1 \ Existing Detention Facility C 1— Recommended Culvert Replacement �� Ir C9 Ir—<J�I I / ? L�J L� (1• / wcxws itQ a n .. • y 2 � ����� � es J ,e r •' ®vn®v Rec^mmended Piping FOCUST 1s; ,o a � � J 99 4600so• Recommended Channel J 6T r�6 I L—�L—JC�C51 I �Y��«a"'ELi ` pmt _� _ "'.•.`��: C'�'i' ® Recommended Detention Facility 7^, \ , 1�-117 ,( !' n' ' -C J ,tl,ltl,l,t Recommended Channel Regrading Recommended-Bridge Replacement ow.OTA tj :��, i1= i i _:,JI -�` ^GIS T(GARDj ;� + g ST l i t 17 �• 1 �i,- F ,c�6 J�I,,. ZU Project Number on Capital _ Improvement Pro ram i able 7-2 i �..o I /J 7j 1 �•` ,J �te:tkmns of me Asn ueee araa,.ye:rslam.m a.aiiwte \\\ I a on r:<aa•,wk..ao=wDa:ea al Fne wasn:,9tw.eounlr F ` -- � :II�I��L✓1��.: •+ orn,n....aat�a.au��a.arrsu.rl.ron ( KC Kr.nnF chin a M.—,Inr. 4LDRMNAGE ington County Department of Und Use and Transportation NORTH MASTER PLAN 111 S.W.A,h SI..Von 11And.OR nT_MT y /'-� p�7��>LE/� 2.26 Eram i ItAv.,IN Ing. e S¢y y R p{ }-1� 0 660' 320'I:.("1 in.h S.W.Q•rMYt Aro.,I',MLinA,(1R V7_yll 1 ll`)l 7. `JJL�AJ�J MASTER PLAN SCALE � FIGURE 7.1 J •\ 3 I i IIPJT 1itplir t ftBt,+ trt ridltat rir lir lir Iit r t 7 d , r r 1 r d s � i a I 1 r l z'1'�T��►�m� i_r+ r e�°l i l � DRAWING is I• - 2 3 4 --. -_ 5 - 6- 7 8 9 IO li.._._.. 12- NOTE: IF THIS PA ICROFILMED -�-^-- LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF Tt£ORIGINAL DRAWING. ----_ os sz ez cz 9z si- sz sz zziz oz sr ®i 1i --9�" Sf- t,� Cl Zi ii---os e e 9 S e s z r c NtraallNu�lmlnu�uuleta�usyalu�!(ttnlif(q WI�IW�r11 A C"H ­--MAR ' 7 19 Q ......... I I EXHIBIT 3.2 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley, Community Services Director January 7, 1987 hituh Randall R. Wooley, City Engine V11 / SUBJECT: Washington Square Drainage The Washington Square area (aproximately 179 acres) drains toward the southwest. The storm drainage from the Square passes under Highway 217 in four large culv:;.rts and then flows through the Cascade Boulevard area of Tigard. The dr&inage systems in the Cascade Boulevard area are poorly defined and inadequate to carry the large volumes of storm runoff from Washington Square during major storms. As a result, there has been frequent flooding of some properties along Cascade Boulevard. The Ash Creek Drainage Master Plan, prepared for Washington County by Kramer, Chin and Maya, Inc. , in January, 1986, describes the history of the problem as follows: "When Washington Square was built, the County incorporated the shopping center property into a special service district, Drainage District Number 2. The purpose of the District was to have been to construct a detention basin to mitigate runoff impacts from Washington Square. The Drainage District, though formed, has never been active. The detention basin was never constructed. Analysis for this project found that a detention basin downstream of Washington Square would increase flooding in Fanno creek by retarding flows from Washington Square to match peak flows from upper Fanno Creek. Thus the Washington Square detention basin was not considered in this plan and is not recommended." Instead of a detention basin, the Master Plan recommends some downstream improvements as shown on Figure 7.1 of the Master Plan (copy attached). The project shown as Number 19 would require construction of new culverts under the railroad spur and the main railroad line along with construction of a new drainage channel to Fanno Creek. The project shown as Number 12 would require substantial regrading of the Ash Creek channel between Highway 217 and Fanno Creek. In addition, improvements are needed to the existing drainage ditches in the Cascade Boulevard area in order to improve flow and reduce maintenance problems. Replacing the open ditches with closed culverts is the preferred solution. A separate study ("Master Drainage Plan, City of Tigard" prepared by CH2M/Hill in July, 1981), has identified over $4,000,000 of improvements required along the Fanno Creek channel to accommodate the increased runoff resulting from upstream development such as Washington Square. Memo to Jill Monley January 7, 1587 Re: Washington Square Drainage Page 2 If Washington Square is annexed to the City of Tigard, the property owners will be required to pay the monthly drainage fee charged to all developed properties in Tigard. At the current rates, the fee for Washington Square would be approximately $1,500 per month. These fees are used to maintain and to improve storm drainage systems. The fees from Washington Square could be used to address the storm drainage problems which Drainage District No. 2 had been intended to address, and to pay a share of the improvement and maintenance costs for the Fanno Creek channel. 28G3P JxM A{ t k� t u CASCADE BOULEVARD AREA STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM South Outlet — Washington Square 1, Culvert and pipe system from Washington Square (adjacent to TGIF/Cinema area) running under Highway 217. 2, 3, 6 4. Culvert and pipe system entering Cascade Blvd. area (adjacent to mini storage lot). 5. Location of culvert and pipe system located next to pini storage sign (adjacent to Scholls Ferry exit). 6. Culvert system that flows to Ash Creek after leaving pipe system under private property. 4 t rr y f L r Q s CASCADE BOULEVARD AREA STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM North Outlet — Washington Square 1, 2, t 3. Manhole access to pipe system located on east side of Highway 217 running under Highway 217 near Progress exit. 4, 5, 6. Culvert and pipe system on west side of Highway 217 adjacent to "Toys R' Us" location (Cascade Blvd.) �i 7-, 8, & 9. Culvert system in Cascade Blvd. area adjacent to Vangas location flowing to fano Creek. R F 3 T O << �� '!.' �= i � - - :T � � _ �� i .. Q Y ,i / EXHIBIT 3.3 ASN CREEK ORAINASE MASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE Rem BRIM i CULVERTS TR311UTARY UPSTREAN OOINISTREAM OESISN FLOM OIAMETER UNIT COST LENSTN COST LOCATION NNE NODE (tfsl tial t$lftl (f t)AKA < ONl 11 8811 117.0 64 11." 111 Sm$80,001.01 S ( :.111 !0202 143.0 94 1162.11 l9 $3,071.1 an" • 2m 2111 119.1 48 1144.N 43 16,401.01IMll • • 2111 2111 121.1 48 1144.11 431 f91,064.011 STEVE Nam- 3131 2022 59.4 36 $108.01 871,6201.0111 15TNq�PINENTOTO TSPRUCEE77TN • 21131 2131 28.11 24 172.01 175 • . 284 2131 28.0 24 f72.a 81 15,032.01 75TH 4 PINE IIETtNR 111312 11311 43.0 1100.01 44 S4,611.010N 91ST ! OAKAY w 130 6024 53.0 io 1111.11 47 iS5,176.01 OLESON cl Com 6 p23 1122 47.1 '3• 191.01 '1t1 g0, . a APT'11=S. of OLESON • M12► 1120 07.0 36 1111.01 194 12!,442.11 NAL!. 6126 6125 70.0 36 1101.11 301 $3215".11 MRM + • 1062! 1162 114.1 94 1162.N 250 148,511.01 MK1.111. HER= �,M#Tm Till 311$4 3161, 321.1 78 S234.014 19,311,11 NTN a • 3112 3111 317.1 72 1216.01 Si 111,011.11 • 3111 4011 313.1 61 $181.01 41 17,301.11 pm PLACE 61 011.11 41 17,IN.N • • f7 560.00 aim Im m TRI/ 3121 31411 94.1 42 f124.M N 10,911.11 NTN NR. FLOREU • • 4121 3111 212.1 54 $162.11 53 10,371. 14 NTN NR.TAYLORS FRY • 4111 4105 62.1 30 111•11 • • 4114 4113 394.0 72 $216.11 41 _11,641.11 CEIARCREST • 4111 1162 916 72 $216.01 228 $!9,240.01 t3-72•,16'L01s11RIK{m:K w�,._.-_.._»------------------------------------------------------------ - TOTAIi-»$453,b72.a- PLUS 452 FOR CONTINGENCY, LEGAL, AONIN., AN EM. COSTS1 1294,152.40 TOTAL COSTS- 1657,124.4 -R ti _J R V .W.. R >• O N to W W W_ • p~. m a=iC u�.. Z W Ij � • ~ R � � S K IO W O O Y O O Z i m W i n 7L /►. QW OC Y sYynYy A ►-. i o ►O- w ^ 4 i J . VI Z w V J 1 W a ••1 •'_N N J m •y m w M cc p, 00o s N : lu t an i O i i i i i i i O i i i i i w w i i i 0 •1 i i •i ✓! ••� m w i i i i i w w i w i w w w •w m Im • i i w i s i • • • w .p + is at w w O w i o.m 1 h r 1.0 1 1 M-! m w !f ! N m ! w N '1! M •m ii • • N t� ; M N ON• N M M M N N N N N _ 1 N N •r .N s ' i oiTnN •= o � o , � � = i i i i i w • . _ a $ San s 1 • w M ! i s 11..�� pw. r vs O C" n m O •!r N 1•'1 r' '� i 1ff P .rIt N p N • si 4 R • _ • N N _ m O !� N i •O .O A A P Q• pp.. M - - N M N N 1 r • •I• N N N N N N N N N N N • � y. I N N N N N N N N • M ' � z �►* � i aIle 1♦ ! m m m N ! ! '� w w N w N s i 4'0 N i qJ ~ � 4 � • � h ! ! t •/ � M P M � M f� 7+ � •ty0 s_ 1 W � ..•i ; i� •t1 pp mm ...• / .i• ..!•w N s N 1�1 N HdW H M M M if N ✓Pi O• �R y} 1 Amin 1 S m r Ns_ ... w � � � A i i N � � • IN1S� � � S � I In to • � 1 1 J LL 1 • p 1 aAnd_ . , ' •A 2 W 4.2 1 • Z _ _ . • ,ice, • • oI • . . Acas . • . • • 1 % W ti W � 4c J Q K Q _ OC to W � O 1y s W ' •C 9 W y N i •_-- Z S Z H ti 0 0 ti m'• S Z C9 Y N .� Y '` Q I`^ �' �.I Z xri• e=D O 1 F+ !� F� F'� ti P� •'� •� X QC QJ � /..• �' O O- W �.1 Zit �C N!. A 1N WO OC i•� W O hm 3�.. Z oG i3 I Ef. Vi t) •••. .- O O t• O 1-' O m = P- W 10 OC .• J O O O W pW� Q J 0 0 0 0 0 F� I.- O r- 4y H O O p O tOC 4 0 I- j •. ►� 1-� s� ONC t>t 7.. .�y h- •"- 1-- ►� ►-- •- Y Z. yyyyyy.���1 i W ~ ~ i� ~ •O� N • i • N i 1 F. tl.. ^ = {Ci w I+ @_ m ! O N A N m.N • p yOy F� 1 fft��1 E �• •� • W O I► ^ Y9 P N A V9 1 N fw •h 1 N. 1- M M -0 M N m "a M m P m w .� • MJr N P P M •19 .O h tV Irf 1 i61 h 1 M ' ; •+. P 1/7 m T -O m -0 If, V7 Y9 P h P -0 N m P N i Y9 P T Y7 M'Y7 O i T T Iti m •1190 •..► 1 / •� • 1\ O ^ r r /r ! �. V'• m 4 M r 1'-- m T r ! P Iff h T ! .O ^ P .N.1 .r{w Y'• 119 r /N �•pp 1 r O I .►.N r r N N N �. N •+ N M N •+ N N N N N N N N N N N /V7 1A ►� 1 N N N M M N N N N N N N M N ••"'• r 1 V7 A • •M N /N 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i s a 0! w V• i 1 11• 1 i O Y: Z m i a! ? •'� a = X 0 1}+► Il IA Y M •6 •� •yy/��� {./p�� S N r. ' 10 w N i i A r f+ A 1I i /� Vf_H_- Uf_A / i_ .► P Mf i_ _ aMi► i O O O OL 4i S -%*:, M M y•I�� M Y7 N M 1/� N ^ H N 1ff H .O /y M �• N (y M pq •/� M H H N 1 h- N N N N N N N N N N M N N M N N M M M N M M M N N M N N } 1 spp1yy {{11.• �: , 4w qft N M ; • v3 .wr •cl• RP'• "3ZolTmn~i �`. m ►M�sorhso• .lio!- aim ^ : '.� � � •'�s � 11.• ,r► •+w��' te�' .. ! � •.. 1 .• ! •19 I►. -0 i as N H ! m N IH T 1/� N P. H ® ! •�1 N H H •'�- �• H m '� _ b► •• N N N N N N N N N N N MI N N N N N N M _ N M N _►N 1 J S • N - i a A ^ OL �• •� f0 N�♦r► •I �O It�rY /�. +0 <! Ci 3 _ [M[/I•�� i M M w w-M I HIy� M M i ! M N w •I► M M Iq •�fy� �O N 1 ?. Y N ti► N N N N i► N N N N N M N M N N M • H ,+'i Yl O ..00 '0 .N• H w N N w N �Ny mi M ^ Ji M N 1 1.V• N N N N N N N M N N N M N N N N N •I► M M N N N M N #j/► • Y. I / 1'a C4 C-4 r~V N Mf rM a i i i • '► M m m14w P H i i Y1 Yf 1/7 i i i i i Vf i i i i i i i i !/f IH y1 i 0! Vf i at Yf .ff i •ff i ,ff �w r t r Y9 .p �O �Y M M Vf .O O 1/7 M N H O• P i .Y N M r H " N N . -O 119= :2 {y ! 119 •f1 11'• �0 -0 -0 Imo. ! !W 1/9 -0 m -O ! H H i i ^ ^•+9 ! T V! •1f ! ^ w w „ .w-• .w• .Hi 1• i" *. ; ...� ..• 1 !V N N N ^6 h N N N N . N N N 04 N N M H M M N N /V •V N N T t .! ! ! T V' A -0 1. •� M� • i i •ff Y7 N Mf i S w A a/'f V�' +s Y7 i C4 I� W M + I► O'- -O i ! -O •A I� ! h Y9 N Y"! •r1 -4 -O y -O 0 ►�. T N .••• M '$ 1 i d M N N ••` N i i ! N i -!O NO YO9• N h + am i N •+ N _a 4. h o � i A sHs N i i A N S • � WO > i 1 � � � ! � w N r M � � M � h � � w w i i � � N N N i - .i-� .i.� .i.• � w � N 1+k N O ; X16 N ' ��yy / i N w I�f N i i i � � {�1 -0 ! P at i_ .r fV H N ++ N i • = O 1 ! �► N N � i ti i M h N N � i -O O O N N A i i� i_ i � 1 3 OQ • i i i i i v A i 0 i i v s H H r i w ^ i i w i ; T ! ! ! 119 ! T •► M � M M M � d i i .-. �+ � N M A U � �• Q i rA 1 • � MR d • ' {y N • 1 Y W V � � • • • . • • • • . O= • . . . • J to Z . • Z • • • . • _ • • • • • us rg 1 4 • M CREEK DRAINAGE MASTER PIAN COST ESTIMATE REPLACE BRIDGES 5 CULVERTS "IgTARY LFSTREAM DONINSTREAM IESIGN FLOW DIAMETER UNIT COST LENGTH COST LOCATION AREA NOSE *DOE t$lfti ffti HAL SOME 1111 1111 117.2 61 $101.98 to $12,211.11 SPRR As" um 2001 t1222 143.1 54 $162.11 19 (3,178.11 89TH • 2202 2011 119.1 48 1144.11 43 16,411.11 HALL • • 2111 2018 121.1 48 $144.11 631 $9!,864.20 STEVE a 2131 2122 59.6 36 $101.11 247 126,676.11 SPR110E-77TH TO 78TH 2131 2131 28.2 24 172.11 975 111,2a.l1 7ST1N�PiNE TO SPRUCEE7ITH 2111 2231 28.2 24 112.01Bt $5,132.21 75TH 6 PINE 0 lETj3 spa„ t1382 11311 43.2 1118.01 44 14,690.!2 91ST & OAKNAY 00� (5i 6032 6014 53.1 30 1101.11 47 15,!76.01 OLESOM 38 $91,01 lli $11,621.01 APT'S S: OF OLESON 1123 6122 47.0. • • 6221 112! 11.1 36 $101S32S01.1 311 32 .91 199 :512.11 NAIL • 6226 6223 71.2 36 fiq.a 210RSE11S • • 1!621 1862 lIf.2 54 $162.11 2S! $42,511.11 HAIL NR. HEMLOCK BOOTH P-13 3a4 3813 32t.1 78 $234.11 42 19,36/.11 e2rH • 3112 3801 317.1 72 1216.01 51 11/,811.11 82ND 3011 410 315.2 61 $I81.11 41 17,311.21 PARK PLACE • • . • 61 $181." 41 11,381.11 ' NORTH TRIO 3/28 Salt 94.1 42 1126.01 61 $g;91�18 BOTH 181. FLOREINXe • 4121 5001 212.1 S4 fib2.11 5933 18,318.11 BOTH NR.TAYLORS FRY • • all 4015 62.1 31 191.11 • 4014 4103599.1 72 $216.11 42 . 18.641.!1 CEOAR�EST "Of 1262 916 72 1216.11 228 $49,248." f3-72',76'LONGINENLOCK ------ -��� ----------------- --SUBTOTAL:---1433,672.1! PLUS 4n Fog COMTtNBENCY, LEGAL, ADMIN., AND ENGR. COSTS: !224,152.42 -------------- TOTAL COST-. 657,824.41 .r .w�1 _T+ k t� f t , ASN CREEL( DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE ! REPLACE BRIDGES 6 CULVERTS N/ DETENTION I GOLF CSE 6 PIPING 4 NALL,ASN BRK,7IST,TAYLORS FRY,NTZ SOL TRt1OTARY UPSTREAM /1 WTREAM DESIGN FLOM DIAMETER UNIT COST LENGTH COST LOCATION AREA NODE NODE Ws! iie! If/#t! lit? - t _._.__.___r____----��-__•_.---------•----------------------------------------------»—__—„_._---_—»------- � WAR 9111, DIN 117 61 $181 iN 318.10.” SPRR SNUARE ASN (ROOK 2001 Ism 03 54 $162 N $3,171.11 09TH 2811 2111 144 48 044 4" 399,36/.11 HALL TO 84TH • 2112 2"1 119 3144 43 16,481.11 mau + 0111 2#n Ln 46 $144 601 116,4N." STEVE TO HALL 2111 2111 121 48 3144 631 141,864.!1 STEVE + 2121 2111 85 42 1126 SN 363,11!.01 791!1 TO STEVE 2122 2121 59 36 $IN 551 159,4"'." SPDC oon TO 79111KTErE i 2101 2#22 59 36 1101 247 326,676." S%U-MV TO 78TH , - 20 24 $72 975 171,2".18 75TIN�tME TO SPR110Etr11TM • 2131 2� { • 2141 2831 71 24 112 It $5,132.01 MR I PINE illTion SCNat. 1171 1#62 24 24 172 12" 386,411.11 LOCUST coE • 1#381 1134 21 31 $9# 13" 1117,01.11 91ST • 391 N 13,913.11 • ' 11312 11311 21 31 10LUF 1S CRtU:K 6#21 4181 48 3/ 391 12" f118,M.21 MALI � S4111N 1411 3164 3113 321 78 1234 48 34,361.0 "IN • 3012 3111 Sil 72 $216 51 338,8".#/ 82ND • • 3t" 4181 313 61 fl8r 41 11,381.18 PARK PLACE • • • 315 68 $t" 41 $7,381.0 NORTH TRt8 5121 SNtI 94 42 $126 N 17,561.0 OLSEN ' • 4138 4111 38 39 $91 40 136,101.0 TAYLORS FERRY PIPING , 41121 S!N 212 54 $162 55 18,911.11 BIT" NR. FLORENCE , • • -4111 480 62 31 $91 93 18,371.0 /1101 ! TAYIORS FERRY } {�{ 4013 399 72 $216 tl $8,60.0 CEO#RCREST a •968 72 $216 221 349,248.11 43-724,761006)•NEMLOCK 4001�_..•- 1062-•-------------------------------------- -101AL: -394#,253.0 N= PLUS 451 FOR CONTINGENCY, LEGAL, AONIN., AND ENGA. COSTS: - $449,213.83 TOTAL COST: $1,447,466.85 • 4f ASN CREEK ORAIKW wASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE REPLACE SRIO6ES 6 CULVERTS NO OETENTtOM a 60LF CSE 6 PIPIN6 f NALL,ASH IRK,71ST,TAYLORS FRY,NTI SOL TRIBUTARY OO1N18TREAN 0016N FLAN OtAKETER UNIT COST 1E116TN COST LOGTteI( fflftl 00 AttEA NODE NODE (CIS) , fiat ---------------- 444_ -----------------4---------------------if SIGIS --------'a' :1!,41.11 SPAR as SIM 1011 1010 117 2101 11211 113 54 1162 14 $3,171.10 8lTN 2101 1110 til $144 691 $4!,361.10 NAtl TO 04TN 1012 2011 114 $144 45 16,/10.10 NALL In 41 $144 . 610 $04,411.1!STEVE TO MALL • 1011 2141 10 1144 631 $41,04.11 STEVE • 2111 nil 121 42 $126 510 1631111.11 "INTO STEVE • 2i21 2111 Is . . 21222 2121 5y 36 HooHoo531 f'A',410.10 #70TN TI 74TN6STEVE • 2121 S4 Silo 247 SHAM" -7nN TO MN • 2131 ?0 24 $72 973 m'm.10 7STWINE TO SPRliCE1d7TN • ml 2131 28 21 172 8l $5,132.10 75TH t P{NE 2031 1162 24 24 112 124' fab.4M.10 LOCUST NETt1E1 ' 1071 ltsi 2/ $4/ 130/ 1117,14.11 4lST TO OAKNAY is 10311 30 190 4/ $3,415.10 OAKfIAY 40 217 • 10312 last21 ORF CS CREEK 6031 6124 53 36 Me 11 45,074. T'S 10 OLESS. OLEO • 6123 6422 47 30 141 lie 111,621.10 AP • 612! 41187 36 $t4 1211 (129,64.11 NALL PIPINS 3103 3I1 70 $234 41 14,361.10 10TH um Till 1014 317 72 1216 54 fi1,ON." 12NO • 3102 4011 41 17,310.10 PARK PLACE 3101 4010 315 61 rifle • i • • • • 60 1181 N $7,310.10 t10ITN tRI1 1021 S4/t 94 42 :126 6t 17,561.10 OLEsdt 31 $!1 410 136,110.10 TAYLORS FERRY P.iPtNe 431 . - 4110 38 6162 55 $1,41!.10 11TH MR. FLORENCE . : . .: � � 262 32 110 43 141,37/.10 /ITN i tAYLARS FERNY r . 4001 443 34! 72 1216 40 $0,640.10 CEOARCREST 1110 1162 tall 72 $216 221 149,240.0 u-72',76_'LON61NEN a" __._.___��______�_� ��...»---------------------------------4444-- -SUBTOTAL: �1986,301.10 PLUS 451 FOR CONTINGEMICY, LEGAL, AONIN., AND EMR. COSTS: $443,035.43 -- -- TOTAL COST: f1,431,136.45 w q y;. \' . tit url ME!I III �1■ its �1�.� ■■■� �� �iu■' .�lMlll.__ u�.tll■.fd 11� �/LMon SUN . � ��Mall • • • • _Mar�I1R. ■JI■ 1�1_...L�� , • .. — C. �� ....�L..or� tl: WIN ■i1! PL Mom !*■�� 11 .," . MW OW 010l" . ■:■ __ oor, 1i 0-1 :!11� �■11: ;1111 IIG IT. 1�� '!�!111111 1■R-. ..I! 1111 u i NMWPM .r 'Also 10 !*�1.�! .� -• � •� ■ Rr_ �'■ 1 II �1n v,.n�-fllr . I �. }1 r :Sr•l�rttr�;n nnnwk ;Alillli: : 1 rilil��ir/ i �■ i�w�,1' �IW ��►r•.'�-„ X1111111■ :11111111/ / ' ' �� -�. ;�l■��� _ �� f! it 1 I�IIIE �■IIti1P All ■ doll", ■ttt - 1'� �n� ����+�►w�rr� mile •n�a 1■���_ 111 ::INiI/t �. 11113. Salo..■ ■«-sa . . , Mi u■t. 1111l�1111: :1/� ■10 �[ 111ll: Dill: 1111■ i■E ■1 ■_ , ::` L ■ 1111=1141110,111 M11! :1111. Will ' aiJ ■� `!��� �� -'fit ■ oil .01111■ i ■� 111/1111 1 .1 �Iu/�� . ..■ Q I �luu■�� 1• ' ■i■ .1110111 Ill■ .l�11. ■111! . •� ■r �; nig •� all � .. —111. ■IIo. ..Ql■ � �,r.,y� ..: �11111 :i11i� Ihi .1111 to E �/ ■� =1��0� ■■ ■� , 11�+ ..L ■1111 1i.. .111g. :1 `t► FEWr '�`'t1�1 ■�. oil u� rll■ ■r 1 ..M!�,. u1■i 'OrR u u!��_ : = t-�= r _ �r�. , a..,.,,.�., .� :� ■� - � ZEN ~, ���.. ■` ■. rr■ . r �s �� •� _ �_� �:�: � M � 111 i;t�. afr:��l\ �� ... r.r� �_ ..� � .� ,' �■ � �.I�! o� Sat ■.•� t[ _, �'1■1 :C• Sa:,�■ �� ���. f� � ■ _■ _ _ mail sna '�11 �•�: ■,■ as it : ` 1� , ■ .Tri■ lug . �I♦ 0101t r 1 1 ■ •u i , y EXHIBIT 5.1 OREGON ADMIIVISTRATTVE RULES CHAPTER 193 DIVLSION S—PORTLAND ML'TROPO[1TAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY C011U*USSWN _ D WSION S by the Legislature since the original law was passed,is to hold down the number of goveiziniental units. When the Portland Boundary Commission carat into existence there were POLICIES approximately 305 units under its jurisdiction.'Today there are 150.'Annexation of urban and urbanizabic land to cities slowly Policies but surely lessens the need for new single purpose units of 193415-000(1)Policy on incorporated status government and will eventually lead to elimination of some (a)Policy:The Boundary Commission generally sees cities existing single. purpose districts. Special districts were as the primary providers of urban services. �n�Y formed a interim devices to deliver services until (b)Basis for icy:This policy is based on the Commis- the areas they served became highly urbanized and needed the Qol' tut services of a city. sion's understanding of its purpose in stun ifying governmen- tal structure and on its tong tam view Oi how governmental i tb o time w� eliminated when Columbia County was structure relates to the economy. efficiency and equity of gypped frons DC jurisdiction. urban service provision. (2)Policy on mediation.coordination and maintenance of firtanciai integrity: (c) The existence of many different governmental units (a) Policy: The Boundary Commission's role includes makes the delivery of urban services unnecessarily complex. disputes arising over boundaries. coordinating 'The visibility and hence political accountability of marry of service delivery, and exploring ways to keep units of govern- these units is relatively low. (The average election turnout . anent financially secure. according to a study in the early Ift was in the nieighbonitood (b)Basis for policy:This policy is based on the Commis- of 4-5%for special district elections).Cities on the atter hand Sion's desire to act as a catalyst to bring about greater long have a relatively much higher visibility and accountability. (A range planning and coordination of the boundary change single city with 5 elected officials might deliver the same procsas. This role is especially important during periods of services as four special districts with 20 elected officials). time when special service districts have lost much of their Cities have the ability to balance service needs and financial base as a result of acinexation-arced withdrawals of allocate scarce resources after comparing the relative merit of territory but still have duties to perform. each service.Special service districts cannot do this. (3)ply an long range governmental structure: (d)Within cities there is relative equity of service levels. (ai) Policy; The Boundary Commission generally favors With delivery by many units.this equity is often lost.The level kgicd long term arranganeeus of governmental stricture of service varies widely, with some being unacceptably low which may dm:mw approval of kTTeWiar boundaries in the short and others being particularly high. tem. (e) Cities generally offer a wide range of necessary (b)Basis for policy:This policy is based on the Coni rds- services for an urban area.Outside of cities some less popular sion's understanding that the Legislature desires the Commis- but necessary services such as storm drainage and paries and Sion to help create a lasting system of responsive,efficient and recreation Are often not available. Cities generally do a better economical govermnental structure.This understanding comes job of long range planning for service delivery. particularly frau a reading of the Boundary Commission statute when it comes to these less popular and visiibie services.They (particularly the-Stanidards-and"policy"sections).and from do so precisely because cities arc by nature supposed to be full legislative intent expressed in numerous hearings hek! and service providers. As the need increases for a new service,the reports issued since the Boundary Commission was first city responds by beginning to plan for it. Each special district cfeacd, plants only for the service it currently provides.Thus.planning Stas.Axih.:ORS Ch.183&.194 for a new ser--'ice is often not done until the need for the Hist: PLC38 3-1982,f. 12-6-42,ef. 1.2-83 service is critical and with crisis at handl. (f)Cities offer greater opportunityy for economies of scale and operational coordination.Tlirotigii interdepartmental joint Policy Papers purchasing and joint operations.economies can be effected in cities that arc usually not possible in small single purpose units. A waiter and a sewer department in a city, for instance, may hworptirsted Status have a single crew and share backhoes,trucks.etc..whereas a 193-85-M(1)Background: water district and a sewer district serving the wane area may (a) The Boundary Commission .Advisory Committee recently(196142)held a series of hearings with representatives duplicate manpower and equipmet t. of special districts and cities. A report was issued with (g) Cities have greater fiscal resources available to them recommendations to the Commission,one of which states: than i�nY single or limited purpose.units. Thus. cities are better able to balance the burden of paying for services and "The Boundary Commission should let it be known that reducing potential heavy 'impacts on any one segment of the urbanized ares should be placed Into incorporated tom )Polioli This goal should be spelled (2a)Policy constraints: does for municipal services.Th out in she as well a poles.„ (a)This policy on incorporated status docs relate to the section of boundary commission law which changes the Commission with maintaining the financial integrity of all units This proposed policy states the desires of most cities within the of government. Clearly, the Commission must uphold this Boundary Commission's jurisdiction. For the special districts portion of the statute as well as to meet its structural improve- the policy reflects what many of them see to be the reality of ment goals. The policy on Mediation. Coordination and the situation even if this does not coincide with their prefer- Maintenance of Fnancisi Integrity addresses this need. nice. Many of the units feel the Commission maintains this (b)Thus,the Commission must temper this policy when it policy de facto and would prefer it be a stated public fact,even conflicts with the maintenance of financial integrity of a though they may disagree with it. special service district. The Commission should view financial (b) One very clear reason for the existence of boundary integrity as applying in each individual case as well as the commissions which has been re-emphasized a number of times cumulative effect. However. the potential negative impact of I- Div.5 (March. 1963) 5.1 F 1 C)Vj GON ADhaza77tATIVE RULES CHAPTIER 193 DIVISION S—PORTLAND MB4 RaPOL1TArN ARM LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMLSSION an action (or actions) on a unit's financial integrity must be Long Range Governmental Structure considered to be an actual threat to the unit's fiscal integrity. 19346415 (1) The Boundary Commission views as a operation.solvency or efficiency. major reason for its existence the facilitation of an economical ability to continue op Stat.Aatlr.:ORS er do 199 efficient system of governmental structure. The boundary commission statute charges the Commission with guiding the roar: PLGB 3.1982.f.12-6.82.ef. 1-243 creation and growth of units of government with this in mind. The statute likewise cautions the Commission against creating Mtillatiom,Coordination and Maintenance of Financial 1ntgPUY igopml extensions of boundaries.The Commission believes it 1903.05410(1)it is the intent of the Boundary Commission should prevent creation of permanently illogical boundaries. to promote greater long range planning and coordination in �)However.the nature of the boundary change llyproresiess st racers.The Commission orad incremental. Because large inhabited areas generally resist relation to the boundary change p annexation to units of government, most annexations art its soft will attempt to be a catalyst in exploring better ways to relatively small. Growth of city and district boundaries when provide public services from a governmental structure pmt of viewed in this light. is almost always -illogical-by definition view,involving particularly the districts.cities and counties it since the addition of each lot or group of lots creates irregulari- saves as wed as other interests in the region. ty in the boundary. Commission must therefore look at the (Z)Tbis rob of searching for ways si improve the service ure of governmental structure and service Y win emphasize PX ininoacti a the very when reviewing individual proposals. When that CAwAnss. Asa con will tion of longstanding practice. the mages t�view indicates eventual logic,economy.efftcien- Coattstirtsiat and staff will attempt to mediate interjihrisdictiorn- cy, structural simplification. greater community identity. al ftiutss arising Iran boundary determination and service equity — and other long term results compatible with sound delivery. long term governmental structure. — the Commission may (3)An ignpotartt aspect of the above rob is the Commis- chase to approve proposals which at fast glance may appear siom's charge to maintain the financial integrity of units of to be illogical extensions. This long t.:rm -.hew may dictate goverment involved in the boundary change process. auacexatiohs of "island" areas or conscious creation of island (4)On a an by cane basis the Commission and its staff areas where circumstances warrant this approach. Particularly wN atwly ways re keep districts financially secure during in the latter case.the Boundary Commission encourages units parkwh of tune when they have lost much of their financial of Wvwriment to work with the Commission and its staff. ratomoss due to encroaching city annexation.but still have a (4) In the past. the Commission has encouraged some duty to provide service.In many cases the cornmu pity at lary cities to explore ways of eliminating partiocularly tortured (i.e,the patrons of such districts)may have a responsibility to with boundaries. Such encouragement is always t out districts that eventually will be entirely annexed with other standards and requirements of the law(stuchST help phase tinting and availability of services); so that while the overan and the Boundary Cominission could be the agent to define tlhe Wel is kept in sight,individual proposals are judged separately. Mathews. with some accepted and some rejected. Slee.Awk.:ORS Ch.113&199 Stat.arta.:ORS Ch. 183 do 199 NW: PLGB 3.1982.t. 12-6.32.ef. 1-2-33 Nth: PLGB 3-1982.f. 12.6482.et.1-2-83 (March. 1963) 2- Div.5 EXHIBIT 7. 1 MEMORANDUM ' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Jill Monley, Community Servic Dire r January 7, 1987 FROM: David Lehr, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Services Impact and Transition Schedule for South Metzger Annexation The following basic Police services will be provided to the South Metzger neighborhood upon annexation: Estimated Personnel and Equipment Requirements for Servicing Metzger: Four (4) Patrol Officers One (1) Investigator — $172,000 One (1) Dispatcher — 23,865 One (1) Marked Patrol Car — 11,500 One (1) Unmarked Car — 11,500 Miscellaneous Equipment — 14,500 $233,365 Estimated Transition to City of Tigard Patrol and Emergency-Response: Emergency Police services would begin following a positive annexation vote as of May 1, 1987 and coordinate with the County Sheriff throughout the transition period. The City of Tigard will recruit and hire additional officers as fast as possible after necessary budgetary authority is granted. The City will rotate experienced officers into the Metzger community as new officers are brought into the Department. This assures a balance of experienced personnel throughout the City. Additional constraints to the immediate assumption of patrol duties are as follows: Apr 187 May '87 June 187 July 187 Aug 187 Sept '87 Oct 187 Nov 187 Annexation. . . Emergency Start up. . . Full patrol services. . . Recruitment. . . New hires. . . Training. . . Based upon the above timelines, it is estimated that full assumption of Police services in Metzger would take place as early as June but no later than September, 1987. DL:sb/0370W Ci �r; MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, ORBGON TO: City Administrator December 31, 1986 (.� FROM: Chief of Police 1 SU&7FJLT: Spruce Street Properties As S.W. Spruce Street exists today, it is fragrrrented into four separate sections between its intersections with S.W. Hall Blvd. on the west end and S.W. 78th Avenue on the east end. Accessibility frau the south cannot be made. In order to reach any of the residents on the south side of S.W. Spruce right of way, access can only be gained frau the north on S.W. Pine between S.W. 85th Avenue and S.W. 77th Avenue. This would create an increase in response time to emergencies due to the fragmentation of S.W. Sprue Street. Those residents that are adjacent to the south of the property lots along S.W. Spruce between S.W. 85th on the west end and S.W. 78th on the east end can all be accessed easily fran S.W. Pfaffle northward, and not increasing response time to er+ergencies at all. f . WE THE UNDERSIGNED DO NOT WISH TO HE FORCED INTO THE CITY OF T I GARD. AMOUNT DATE NAME ADDRESS OF PROPERTY �- l.L�-.s----- _ - /C (L?- _ `, ` � `S�"16r L- =�_!'4 7 i ti�-� _- - T'4 T______ I ���,`..� _i -�.�cJt1�i.y�• —�_T ------------------ zz's ^iwx _ f� L_------ J ' / -----if .W �f.��G T !17 _6CZ- Ii - IT �1 Siate �. L G1-.�+-� �-.. _,.{=1-+•,,tit_..• iL__r� Sl_�l_,lrL1 _... �.�.�.,Z�o1s►�� .- `- lam &nrz -�?L�---�-��> Jy �•�_�?-- ------Jl�t_ _ --------i22.? !S 1:.tc_`•�1 � �-i' ----rL�l1.Z�JLC .o.Z��^ - �Z.��an�_'__-�.:i 3c�� 3•%-�C�Vii~ �r �rr4 '�� �;,�1t�s��,2.�t1�2.y .J�-z=� _-_��_!L-- as LL,,=L4L: zZ - y _' s�? �_� jl o1 ------- .Z4 ------ r 26 a9.7 fir%g=L_5� • --- i� 3-t 3Li. L.L2_f�Z_ t ,.� _L% �ye��1Ls�� f.�.� _ ----Z�`s►�-,u�u all 37 tt-1/ a _ c= ��q�q.� �_ u� iEv___�z AL,(-------74 ���:_ 07- / 1_l! `6��_ � 5�.- L rte. 8-`�--------�;�'y--- if xy t------ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------- WE THE UNDERSIGNED DO NOT WISH TO BE FORCED INTO THE CITY OF T I PIRD. AMOUNT DATE NAME ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ----------------------------- 3? ------------------- - --------- -- !=••�3.1—�-i— '----�-��Q�,�et '6. Lit_5..�...-- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- --_.---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------- f ----------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------=------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ;; ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- WE THE UNDERSIHONED DO NOT WISH TO 9E FORCED INTO THE CITY OF T I OARD. AMOUNT DATE NAME ADDRESS OFF PROPERTY r = ------------- - - - ' ssssss___ ✓ _ __ ___.- _ ------------------- ___ ------ irk 111 ri 11ar � � 13 ----------- -------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------ t ----------------------------... ��.---..--- __—_—____---_____r`__ ..: ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ,.i ------------------------------------------------------------- .' ------------------------..-_--_---.---_—. —________—_______________ _. ------------------------------------------------------ ---------- -------------------------..---------.—.-.-----------------_---------- •h ------------------------------------------------------------- . ----------------------------------_—..--------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- _ -------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------------- .a[ --------------------------------—.-----------_----------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------'--'- -----'-------------------------- 4111- 1 x -------------------------—--_---------------- ----------- ------ ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ ------------------------------------------------------_— ------------------------------------------------------------- y,:g ------------------------------------------------------------ 8311 S.W. Spruce Metzger, OR 97223 January 12, 1987 Tigard City Council c/o Tigard City [call Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Tigard city Council: I am unable to make your January 14 meeting, since it has been scheduled right in the middle of a Workday. However: I Want to go on record as OPPOSED to annexation of the portion of Metzger defined by your latest boundaries. As a property owner on Spruce, the Proposed boundary street, I'd be affected by your plans for the street itself as Well as by the confusion of services mice,et�twhich would result. ,Annexation has already overwhelmingly. cinct 27* which includes Spruce, Was opposed I would appreciate it if you would stop trying to annex the properties of people who have already indicated that this is not what they want. It would also be appropriate not to schedule further discussion meetings during times when many working property owners obviously cannot attend. Sincerely, ylilliamson Ic a 3 January P, 1987 Tigard City Council City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall lost Office Boa 23397 TiFmrd, Oregon 97723 To the Tigard City Councils the City of Tigard decides to annex a part of Metzger. the Council net the 29th of December and voted in favor of the anadzation. Why should I believe that the vote would be different this time. We know that the Council would not vote against itself and what the City of Tigard waste. I protest being forced into the City of Tigard. If I an f ted into the city, I shall be forced in voting against anything the City of Tigard proposes. Sincerely, Dan Agus 9445 S. W. Lehman Street Portland, Oregon 97223 u� ®• X 3 3 :h } evX. 'ft a. fps:`;r4.,,�,na Y`.�� � _ - •e.a/'xKivtB�.�_+� Iki' k aa .■_ � ■rte w ,....�� J■� ._..��� �■� ���! ..�,►F, `a ,,,t'�`�.`� amu■ nOr ii .� ■�■■u rte.. —�i'. �� ■ _ . �.. =011G., up �� ■■I■ WIN rrt■ � !! ■1 �.iu� a ■■■ �■� 1�� N■ltin R—,/11l9 i��il- 1111111,�i: ---_,�� .r.' �.r' ■ICt ..� �unrrnt►t. ��. 1�' _ 1, in�11 �■■.■� w■t 1 ,�■ -1� -� .. tlrr� �� � 1111 i�iil� � 11 Ina MIN .. .,1 ` �. '�,� • ■ . I, _si __ mm SIZE MINIMUM OWN r� -]` L�Il♦� iii I a:i w� ■ !♦:�■� .... 11111111 �u ■.-i irn :,-.� ii1: t�`�ri. - —.■. ,� -�■ _ ■■ r IIIA ■1w L1■ tt•r■ N■� ■■`'.� �itlltt��BiU1■ ... w ■.■w ■ �� ■ J m - i� Ilii ii■ ML .1, ilZ w■'� ,; -i �'��hi►i1■ ■■ ■1 !+ tri!!■1. _. =il. ■1_mane s_ �+ Zvi cc■t,ttt■.DIY �■ mart ■-� Ilw ■r■r .-/ '!3 INK ME Mn---`:E ' �+w +tF' Inl IA1: ::': :03soil mij IN= Flo MOP Nc :11111 L�►�rY,. a :1lrtisZj C am— Ila .�' r �■rte_ �11111oll ter■ �� roll! .'��� ' rt r. idn' � 111111111 ' ...��►��■r�� lill :f: :/Il� . _,� �+`� � � i1i11■�I�ItI� ONr.., all 11 on logo �� t� � _ �;�i ,=ice � � ■r■� :nll�■■.. �' ' Nunn oov�, Cm`■r OWN go i t 1. � ,�1�`_ c- �a/■\■�1 �- 11V�, • 0 m oil MAP S - . ��/ J I 5 �/#rr V�� i r. w ■■nut-, �� 1 CITY OF TIGARD. OREM NOTICE OF SECOND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 141987 AT losBQN00N CONSIDER FOLLOWING APPI.ICATIONsHALL OF THE TIGARD C CENTER _ 13125 SW HALL BLVD., &LG D, FILE NO. ZCA 20-86 NPO i 2 6 4 APPLICANT: CITY OF TIGARD OWNER: Various PO Boz 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 NOTE: The Tigard City Council received testimony on December 29. 1986 from interested parties regarding the South Metzger Annexation Proposal. One issue frequently addressed was that receipt of the hearing notice was delayed throuih the heavy holiday mail. In order to ensure that all interested parties have received notice and had a chance to testify, the Tigard City Council has called a special Council meeting for January 14, 1987 at 12:00 Noon at the above noted address. REQUISTs The purpose of this special meeting is to hear the public hearing item noted lov and forward an annexation proposal to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. The Boundary Commission hearing is scheduled for February 12, 1987'at 7s;0 pm at the Multnomah Courthouse. 1040 SW Stb, Portland, Oregon. LOCATION: The area to be annexed will be designated as an established area in c ormance with Chapter 18.136 of the Tigard Municipal Code. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan zoning and comprehensive plan designations as adopted by the Washington County Board of Commissioners (Ordinance Nos. 278, 279. and 280. and subsequent amendments thereto) will be applied. The City will assign City of Tigard planning and zoning designations in conforaancs with the Tigard Municipal Code and Oregon Revised statute of Hall requirements. Blvd., Locust and SprucetStreet. i vast ofthe th at side of Multnomah HCountyy217, & south Line, i north of Highway 99W and Pfaffle Street. (WCM 131 26C Late 100, 200, 300, 400, 401, 402, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1300, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1401, 1403, 1700, 1900; WCTM 1S1 26DB Lot 1300; WCTM 131 26DC Lots 900, 901, 902, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003. 1004. 1005, 1006, 3100. 3200, 3300, 3301, 3302, 3500, 3600, 3700, 3701, 4100. 4200, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4601, - 4602, 4700. 4701, 4800, 4801. 4900. 5000, 5100, 51019 WCTM 181 35BL Lots 100, 101, 1802; WCTM 1S1 35AC Lots 2900. 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3900, 4000, 4100. 4206, 4300; WCTM 1S1 35BD 100; WCTM 151 35AB Lots 100, 202, 243, 204, 400, 500, 501, 302 7 3203 701,205 23300, 801,3301.9 30302 901,3033,, 33044,,23400�, 1004,3401, 3402, 3403, 34042901, , 3500, 36001 WCTM 3203, 3205, 35AD Late 900, 901, 1000, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1705, 1706, 1800, 1801, 1900, 2000. 2001. 2100, 2101, 2200, 2300, 2301, 2302, 2303, 2401, 2402, 2403, 2404, 2405. 2500, 2301. 2502, 2503, 2504, 2505, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200; WCTM 1S1 35AA Lots 401, 500, 890, 600, 800. 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 900, 901, 902, 903. 904, 905. 1000, 1001, 1002, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1200, 1301, 1400, 1900, 1901, 2000, 2500, 2600, 2700, 3600, 3700, 3701, 3702. 3703, 3704, 3705, 3800. 3900, 3901. 3902, 4000, 4100, 4101, 4200, 90000, 90001, 90002, 90003, 90004, 90005, 90006, 90007, 900081 90009. 90010; WCTM 1S1 35DA 100, 200. 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 20 205 206,4207,00. 2208, 209,WCTM �0 211, 212, 2i336CC Lots , 400, WCTM 1S1. 3608 100, 200,- 202, 203. , 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221. 222. 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 360, 301, 400, 401, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 700, 701, 790, 890, 900, 1000, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000 2100, 2200, 2300 2400, 2500, 2600, 2700, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300. 3400, 3500, 3600, 3700. i�p& 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200, 5300, 5400, 5500, 5600, 5700, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6200, 6300, 6400, 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 6900, 7000, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7400, 7500, 7600, 7700, 7800, 7900, 8000, 8100, 9 2i000= 8300,, 8 00, 500, 8600, 100. 8700, 8800, 8900, 9000, 9100, 9200, 9300, 9400, 9500, 1600, 1601, 1700, 1800 2100, 2201, 2202, 2203, 2204, 2205, 2206,2207, 2208, 2209, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2700 2800, 2900. 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3301, 3500, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4201, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 5600, 5700, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6900, 7000, 7100; WCTM 1S1 36DB Lots 600, 700, 800, 900. 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700. 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300; WCTK 1S1 36AD Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 501, 600, 601, 602, 603, 700, 800, 900. 1000. 4000, 4001, 4100, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4600, 4900, 5000. 5100. 5200, 5300, 5400, 5500, 5600, 5700; WCTM 1S1 36AA Lots 2200, 2201; WCTM 1S1 36AC Lots 3800, 3801. 3900.) (See Map On Reverse Side) Further information may be obtained from the Planning Department or City Recorder at the same location or by calling 639-4171. You are invited to submit written testimony in advance of the public hearing; written and oral testimony will be considered at the hearing. The public hearing will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and with rules of procedure of the Tigard.City Council- iv/4463A 3030 S. W. Upper Drive Portland, Oregon 97201 January 9, 1987 Mr. Bob Jean City Manager City Hall Tigard. Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Jean, I own property located at 9960 S. W. Greenburg Road and I am writing this letter to go on record as suppporting annexation to Tigard. Please add this to the testimony in support of annexation to Tigard at the meeting on January 14, 1987. i will be unable to attend. Thank you. Sincerely, Emily ouise Roe h 1-1,947 Q CGP January T, 1987 TO: The Tigard City Council and The Planning Department FROM: Marjory Haglund 11075 S•W• Rall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon RE: File No. ZCA 20-86 NPO # 2 & 4 I attended the meeting December 29, 1986 to express my desire that we be annexed to the City of Tigard. We have received another notice of a meeting on Jan. 14, 3987 regarding the South Metzger Annexation Proposal. I plan on attending this meeting, but I am submitting this letter to reiterate my stand that we be annexed to Tigard. I was surprised at the group of people attending the Dec. 29th meeting, who are not in the area of the proposed annexation and their determination to oppose annexation regardless of the wishes of the residents of the proposal. As I expressed in RV testimony at that time, I felt 3W area was not well represented by the Metzger CPO. I offered to serve on committieso=but pie never e eerasked toia control so, and I came to the conclusion that a small group and they that they had worked on a Metzger plan to submit to Washington County, were unwilling to make any ciienges irregardless of the wishes of the residents in the immediate beon in listened orif wetsubmitt d Information.eel we would have This isea animportant Tigard and vocal reason for sly request for annexation. Washington County has informed us that LID's will be formed, through additional taxation, if we vent road maintenance and additional police PrO action to the we Would be better served by Tigard because of our proximity• we would figures, the cost would be about the same, but we would have some of the additional ammenities offered by a city i! we are in Tigard. Washington Square is fighting annexation tooth and R&U-according to their testi,• ancial reasons for doing Mony at the Dec. 29th meeting. I can understand their fin so, but Washington Square has really changed the complexion of the Metzger area. Traffic has increased dramatically on the streets leading to- the square, particularly on my street, Yell Blvd. Other businesses have located in the area because Washington Square is here. It would seem a criminal element Would be attracted by the Square and this would effect the Metzger area, also. I am not against Washington Square. I shop there frequently and belong to the Meridian Park Hospital MIUng program at the Square and feel the Square is an asset to us. However, they do have an obliSation to the residents of the area to help us solve some of the problems that have evolved since Washington Square has been built. Historically, people have objected to change and fear it. se However change started have in this area the month the Tigard exit opened from 15• I hve seen s great many ^ ' changes in the 30 years I have lived in or how- Tunnel vision never solves say- }; thing, and I feel we must adjust to the changes that have occurred and plan for then. Annexation into Tigard will help us solve some of our problems and build then. for the future. . Thank you, l- ILI-57 8311 S.W. Spruce Tigard, OR 97223 rte- January 13, 1987 Tigard City Council City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear City Council Members: I am unable to attend your 12:00 meeting on January 14, and find it highly annoying that such a meeting was scheduled in the middle of a working day. However, as a five-year resident of Spruce St., I want to be counted as opposed to the annexation of any portion of Metzger bordering on Spruce. Metzger has already voted against annexation and I fail to see why we have to keep repeating the process. Sincerely, ren E. Larson Lei at:t - OaT Of AAPeA, y c(r �'J.4yo r ANO XOlve of hf A,�Ce No Al�s TA ke . / o yv�r l'ePr'eSc�1dTA7i vP s Mei z6er w o w.O be ,6�Y,veir ed To 6eTA e r or .VoT AT A//. T!e vvTe s NU you A40e bef 4 yed Tied M�%zGer /'�s:��.vCe euTsd� of TAe 011o�0Sed 41-e4 wXo wo/'leecl So 4.4rd To /Aa// Mel--z&er iwk T'6!,4rd AS A cwAaly . Ti(rry d:d,e�T co.4,vT Pi e ce M PA/ .4N19 7-he T✓;wsTed yo W, ,4r Die zA s'T 1Zee7-,'1✓ Ml; m rd 5.x;0 A .t/ZA4Zer D Peo /e 6 r,4ve Tip;er ex R;N Tih+ e- To A i'A1 4 i4/loGv c,,d A :A4 1W c:eW 1,,,A i re c1 Time To S1�e A K, yo el D;.D.v ' T .4YK for A CouNT D:f Aese /oe&v, . Z Fee/ ,7-A,S w�S G1os�/y ;Mlio r . AID ouT of oeDer. 2 ) A.V1t ,uGToA✓ -Vgce.4 m h A D L;TT/e S,4y the u7- he;AI& - AA-IlYe r ed. 4re,4 DAY/y 6ordeis' Jo or 4OASh ;XGA-PW SQuAre . ColwH woa Go Xpwe To DAX yot� Dv so i.v _ .�dlsGr loe. /i Ei41'd 4,4S zasT ;7-T _ resyoQcT;b: y . of McTZ Ge.r e4A1We,<e5 _ S'ra.__ .4/ow& cojTh oar ot;&NDS .4AID J'%47-49s 'cvo c.[AIYDTe.. yore -peoe/e P;A(,e _��V . T.'sw Id u,.T,•l/ j ore_ reIlers'� _.Th.�s'. .�. aT!�i✓...dw1�--��,��✓ Ta al-&e t_orAer.� Tv do . TAP._--,V,4me, l e A Ave f'e4;w CAI Po!'T/ANd� I A& Cr/'o de a NTc D 4,4T., / ,v Ta S1,o,P _ _ .. ...--------------------_.---- JAN January 13, 1987 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: Bill Monahan RE: Zone Change Annexation ZCA 20-86 South Metzger NPO No. 2 and 4 Dear Bill : I'm writing to you in response to the attached hearing notice. I have no reservations of the South Metzger Area being annexed to the City of Tigard. However, if annexation succeeds it is my opinion that the entire northwestern half (west of a north-south line parallel to and along S. W. Lincoln St. and the east boundary above S. W. Locust St. Area) be zoned either C-G or C-P. This would give a broader consistent zoning to the area and would allow more commercial expansion to occur with close proximity to a major shopping center, Hwy, 217 and main collector streets such as Greenburg Rd. and Hall Blvd. I also feel that with this zoning the area would meet all the stated purposes of Section 18.62.010 and Section 18.64.010 per the City of Tigard Planning Ordinances, and would benefit the surrounding community and the City of Tigard. Sincerely, Ken asmussen 100:0 S. W. Johnson Tigard, Oregon 97223 KR:kmc C17Y®F TIG.4RD OREGON 25 Yecra of SerWce 1951-1986 CITY OP TIGARD, OREGON N 0 T I C E O F P U B L I C N E A R I N G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVE THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 29 1986 AT 6:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER 1 1 SWHALL BLW., TIGARD, OR, BILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: PILE NO-. ZCA 20-86 • NPO 0 _I 6 4 APPLICANT: CITY OF TIGARD OWNER, various PO Boz 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUESTS To forward an annexation io Proposal to the Portland Metropolitan Area dary Local Government LOCATIONS On the east side of Spruce Streets. and west x of tay lhe Mui and nomah County ty Line, and northof Highway 99W and Pfaffle Street. (WCTM IS1 26C Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 401, 402, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1510 26DCOLot°302,900,1303,901, 902,E 1403, 1700,1000 loot, 102,E 003, 1004JSJ 26DB Lot 1005, 10061. 3100 3200, 3300, 3301, 3302, 3500, 3600, ,3700,3701, 4100, 420, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4601, 4602, 4700, 4701, 480, 4801, 4900, 5000, 5100, 532U; 3 TM 1S}400350. 100, 101, 1802; WCTM 1S1 35AC Lots 2900, 300, 100, , 3600, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300; WCTK iSl 35BD 100; WCTM I.S1 35AB Lots 100, 901, 1000, 202, 203, 204, 400, 500, 501,0 3200 , 320, 701, 7 3203,02, 0, $013300be 3301, 3302, 1002, 1003, 1004, 2800, 2901, , 3303, 3304, 340, 3401, 3402, 3403, 3404, 3500, 3600; WCTM 1Sl 35AD Lots 900, 901, 1000, 110, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1705, 1706, 1800. 1801, 1900, 2000, 2001, 2100, 2101, 2200, 2300, 2301, 2302, 2303, 2401, 2402, 2403, 2404, 2405, 2500, 2501, 2502, 2503, 2504.2508002780, 2800, 803, 2900, 300, 3100, 3200; WCTM is 9033, 904t°905, 1000, 590, 0,1, 102, 1100, 1101, 804, 805, 806, 900, 901, 902, , . 1102, 1200, 1301, 1400, 1900, 1901, 2000, 2500, 2600, 270, 3600, 3700, 3701, 3702, 3703, 3704, 3705, 3800, 3900, 3901, 3902, 400, 410, 4101, 4200, 9000, 90001. 90002, 9003, 9004, 90005, 700680900070 1900, 2000, 90,101 0200WOT22151 35DA 100, 200, 300, 400. 50, 600, 2300, 2400, 2401; WCTM 208,32209,Lots 210,X211,4212,WCTH 1S1,213, 214, 215, 216, 2 100, 17, 216, 203, 204, 205 206, 207, 401, 219, 220, 221, 222, 233, 224, 225, 790, 227, 228, 229, 30130 81 1400,,1400, 50. 501, 502, 503, 504, 700, 701. 160, 1700. 1800, 190, 200 2100, 2200, 230, 2400, 2500, 260. 2700, 2800, 2900, 300, 310, 3200, 3300, 340, 350. 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900, 400, 4100, 4200, 430. 4400, 450, 4600, 470, 480, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200, 5300, 540, 5500, 5600. 570, 580, 5900, 600, 6100, 6200, 6300, 6400, 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 690, 700, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7400, 1500, 760, 7700. 7800, 7900, 800, 8100, 820. 830, 8400, 850, 860, 870, 8800, 8900. 900, 9100, 9200. 9300, 940, 9500, 9601 WCTM 22066 36C& Lots 22096 +2300, 2400. 2500;00, 1601, 1700, 1800 22700 2800, 2202, 2203, 2204, 2205, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200 3300, 3301,-3500, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900 400. 4100.' 4201, 4300, 440, 4500. 4600, 4700, 560, 5700, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6900, 700, 7100; WCTM 151 3609 Lots 600, 70, 80, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 160, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100. 2200, 2300; QCTK 1S1 36AD Lots 10, 200, 300, 400, 500, 501, 60, 601, 602, 603, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 4000, 4001, 4100,4400, 450, 460, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200, 5300, 5400, 5500, 5600, 570; v= ISI 36AA Lots 2200, 2201; WCTM 1S1 36AC Lots 3800, 3801. 3900.) (See'Map on Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING IN THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HE RULES OF PROCEDURES OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. pLEASS THE CITY DBFAFURTHER RTHENis-ATI 6399--4T1I711Ns CITY OF TIGARD 13125 S RECORDER BLVD PTIGARDD,, OREGON 97223. !�■. Emu ow IN a oil MUCH .■■.■■... man��,,CCr ''saw" ` .�: :11 .0 • ■ Mpg M Mal 11A !1/: :f:� IIIA L■ ���•_.� - i■■f� dWINanIowa so , WaM �. tam, M Zito���, � ■!■ Gill �� � 7 � op an U-SM, 111M wR�.11M, an PIImoi■ ■4� an qd Ul How 5 U rF I,LN�11w avn a AI W4 (-111 t! ! an an lam a ■' l� �'■ ■ ■� I �■/ = `7l �i�l� �'i$��t+ , ter,. Man , ■� �= tea.. ,a `1Ir • ��■i :i■ ■.■. ■Its ■ ■ illI�i■i .■ moi... '� �rmm ■■ ■■.■ ■■.■ �■ ■�■ /■/■■Alnos an la �.. ■■r . ■moi ,amu �::..���'��d���s ■oi n ■■� � � • . �an - �_ ,,'' Big I U. Lot NINE as mammon MOM pp_ o=—�:•.����e��� !IreM :■■rl� am g �� ■�r� „� �� � gip. c �� _ � ,�■■. a — ����-:..r-.�,'d �i � '�� �� �� Fri ■i�� . _ , 11 1■ t11�Fh�n,i i�� �ii�u. - � '�tt■I+= :E DI:low