City Council Packet - 11/24/1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak n an
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate
BUSINESS & STUDY AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, _
NOVEMBER 24, 1986, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are
13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting
either the Mayor or City Administrator.
o STUDY SESSION - Economic Development Committee
1. REGULAR MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call All City Council Present
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items
2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please)
3. OATHS OF OFFICE
o Mayor Gave to Police Officer Laurie A. Wulf
4. PUBLIC HEARING - SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE REVISIONS
o Public Hearing Opened
o Declarations Or Challenges
o Summation By Community Development Director
o Public Testimony: Prc%nonents, Opponents, Cross Examination
a Recommendation By Community Development Director
o Council Questions Or Comments
o Public Hearing Closed
o Consideration By Council Br/Jo approve changes as noied; Ord.
for 12/16 Meeting UA
S. PUBLIC HEARING - DOVER LANDING REVIEW - PD 2-86 - NPO #6
o Public Hearing Opened
0 Declarations Or Challenges
o Summation By Community Development Director
o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
0 Recommendation By Community Development Director
o Council Questions Or Comments
0 Public Hearing Closed
o Consideration By Council Jo/Ea Change 108th UA
6. PUBLIC HEARING - ENGLEWOOD SUBDIVISION EASEMENT VACATION
o Public Hearing Opened
o Declarations Or Challenges
a Summation By City Recorder
o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Recommendation By City Recorder
o Council Questions Or Comments
o Public Hearing Closed
o Consideration By Council - Ordinance No. 86-56 Jo/Ea UA
4 7. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND ZONE CHANGE FINAL ORDERS
7.1 Georgia Pacific CPA 7-86 and ZC 15-86 (NPO No. 5); Ordinance No.
86-57 Or/Jo UA
7.2 Bethany Associates CPA 10-86 & ZC 18-86 (NPO No. 7); Ordinance No.
86-58 Br/Ea UA
0 Community Development Director
COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 24, 1986 - PAGE I
L:
8. ORDINANCE NO. 86-59 er/M UA 87TH STREET - ADOPTING REQUIREMENTS
FOR PARKING AND LOADING ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 86-60
9. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
9.1 Receive and File:
a. Department Reports
9 2 Ratify Council Decision of November 3, 1986 to Uphold Planning
Commission and Staff Recommendation for Denial of Requests for
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Change Requests:
a. Nordling, Scott & Martin CPA 8-86 & ZC 16-86 (NPO No. 4);
Resolution No. 129
b. United First Federal Savings - CPA 9-86 & ZC 17-86 (NPO Na.
5); Resolution No. 130
9.3 Approve Training Request - Public Works Operations (Wastewater) -
$340 Br/Ed UA
10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive
Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) & (h) to discuss
labor relations and current/pending litigation issues.
12. ADJOURNMENT 9:45 PM
cw/4281A
. E
PAGE 2
COUNCIL.AGENDA NOVEMBER 24, 1986 -
s:
T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — NOVEMBER 24, 1986 — 6:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian, Carolyn
Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob
Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community
Development Director; Tin, Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen
Wilson, Acting City Recorder.
2. STUDY SESSION
a. A workshop with Economic Development committee was held. Amo
De Bernardis, Committee Chairman, introduced the other Committee
member present, David Clement. Community Development Director
nude a presentation on the history of the design project for
Downtown. The overall concept plan for the downtown design
economic development needs is suggested to be determined through
PSU's participation. Dr. Stefano Zigretti and Dana Fadely of the
PSU School of Urban Affairr, Department of Urban Studies and
Planning were presented to Council as the PSU participants in the
proposed study.
b. Stephano outlined the use of PSU students to assist the community
in developing a report regarding economic feasibility. He
indicated the need to determine the community's feeling and
encouraged spending as much time as possible to research and
define the goals. He also felt that as many visuals as possible
should be used to assist in defining the plans.
C. Discussion followed regarding the study boundaries. Amo
DeBernadis indicated that the downtown boundaries needed to be
defined. Councilor Eadon suggested using the TURA boundary and
Councilor Brian supported that suggestion.
d. Councilor Edwards liked the concept of a market study. He also
supported the merge of the Transportation and Economic
Development Committees.
e. David Clement apposed the permanent merge of the two committees.
He felt there needed to be focus on their specific areas of
expertise and interest. Councilor Edwards indicated the group
working with PSU needs to take a look at the total picture and
supported a merge for the project study time. This was agreeable
to David Clement.
f. Stephano noted that Phase I of the project (framework) was in
place by June 30, 1986. City Administrator stated he was excited
with both the recognition stage (to be completed in January,
1987) and Phase 2 (implemented by the end of June). The
recognition stage would involve the definition of the goal
statement and a city-wide survey. Phase 2 would then consist of
developing alternatives and options for an action plan. Phase 3
would include the implementation of the action plan by June 1988,
definition of the action plan, CIP's, financing, and specific
projects.
Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 24, 1986
The Administrator suggested a task force be appointed with
representatives from the following: Utility and Franchise
Committee to tie in infra-structure, Transportation Committee,
Economic Development Committee, City Council, Planning
Commission, and staff.
g. Stephano stressed the importance of communication throughout the
study with all committees in order to reduce the risk of problems
and/or oversights.
Councilor Johnson distributed guidelines and objectives of the
task force comm?.ttee. She proposed consideration of CBD Advisory
Committee to pursue the membership and goals.
h. After lengthy discussion the following committee makeup was
agreed upon.
1 Member Utility and Franchise Committee
4; 2 Members Transportation Committee
2 Members Economic Development Committee
1 Member City Council - to serve as liaison only
T
3 Members at-large representatives from the City with no
more than one from CBO business and two from
outside the CBD area.
i. Community Development Director discussed staffing possibilities.
He indicated Duane Roberts could be available half-time for the
project and approximately 20 to 30 hours per week of Liz Newton's
time. Bill then distributed copies of the Downtown Land
Inventory.
j . Councilor Brian expressed concern regarding 1-1/2 years now when
a 2 year TURA was done before. He thought the TURA plan
information should be utilized. A discussion followed regarding
the Economic Development Committee's work program. Community
Development Director noted the committee's concerns.
k. Dana indicated that the TURA plan was good, basic information. A
new project will begin with a market analysis.
1. A consensus was reached that a report would be presented to City
Council on December 15, 1986 regarding the recommendation of a
task force with use of the PSU format for Urban Design Process.
BUSINESS MEETING BEGAN: 8:04 PM
3. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
a. Community Development Director indicated he had information
regarding an award being given by the Asphalt Pavement
Association of Oregon for Non-Agenda.
b. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards to
approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 24, 1986
4. VISITOR'S AGENDA — No one appeared to speak.
5. OATHS OF OFFICE
a. Mayor Cook administered the oath of office to Laurie Wulf, a new
police officer.
6. PUBLIC HEARING -- SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE REVISIONS
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. The Community Development Director indicated that amendments for
TMC 11.04 Solid Waste Management had been proposed by the Utility
and Franchise Committee. Their task had been to examine the
existing franchise agreement with particular emphasis on the rate
structure and the ability of the Committee to adjust future
rates. The Committee prepared a new format for the franchisees
in filing an annual report and the amendments would give some
direction for the annual report timeframe. The reports would be
filed on a calendar year basis. The adjustment period would also
be on an annual basis that if rate adjustments are justified by
the franchisees. He continued by noting that there is a need for
the City to research the possibility of violations of the
ordinance to continue to be misdemeanors or whether they should
be civil infraction violations. He will report on this topic
after discussion with the City Attorney within the near future
and requested direction from Council.
C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
d. Public Hearing Closed.
e. Motion by Councilor Brian to direct staff to prepare an ordinance
setting forth the amendment* to TMC 11.04 as proposed. Seconded
by Councilor Johnson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - DOVER LANDING REVIEW - PD 2-86 - NPO ,y6
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. The Community Development Director requested Senior Planner Keith
Liden to present the staff information. Senior Planner Liden
stated the Engineering staff sees no particular purpose for 109th
to be a minor collector from Kent Drive or Riverwood Lame south.
It could be developed to a local street standard with a minor
collector standard applying from Kent Drive to the north.
C. Councilor Brian inquired about the name of the southern loop.
Senior Planner Liden stated the name was River Drive and 107th
Loop. They are both to local street standards. The east has not
T,. been determined at this point.
.._.. ..Page,3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 24, 1996
i
d. Public Testimony: supported a
Waneta Chamberlain, 16720 SW 108th Avenue, south and
o Riverwood Lane)
standard street from Kent Drive
a collector street north of the intersection.
letter from Mr. & Mrs. Hochtrett
° Mayor Cook read a
supporting development of a local street standard south o
tion.
the proposed Kent Drive intersec
Roger Anderson, Attorney
for Ken Waymire (Developer)o
ort of the staff recommendation to the north
°
noted his Supp He requested City Council direct
of the intersection, along
staff to obtain five feet ofPhillips'
� 11 psona property hf that was
tooth Avenue from Mrs.
required by application in 1984.
Mayor Cook read a letter from Mrs. Elton C
Phillips
° right-of-way dedication in which she indicated
regarding possible removal of several trees in the
concern over P area.
proposed right-of-way Suite 910,
Alder, Portland, OR,
Stanley Sharp, 621 SW stated the record shows that
° for Mrs. Phillips, be dedicated to
Attorney
MLP 6-84 required additional loath Avenue from Mss. Phillips'
the public along uncertain from the file information ll
property. He gm's was designed to run
whether the right-of-way w arty. He stated the removal
length of the Phillips P P the aesthetics of
of several old fir trees would destroy
the home and property. issues being
I
City Administrator stated there arctwo portion of the
discussed. One is the request to change a Po
roadway from a minor cth�° rtion tfiatwould residential d
aff affect The second, which is
Phillipa' right-of-way, is the condition under th® old MLP
6-84 as to the 25 foot from would rprefe line detheachange t
suggested that Mrs. Phillips'
question would be whether she
the residential
standardaefcond rom the minor standa
Sharp agreed. give that right-of--waY or not. Mr.
was conditioned to g
Sharp again agreed.
Development Director requested Council direction as e
iverwood
e Community rtion of 108th south of Kent DrivelR
whether the po
be redesignated as a local street
Pulling
of residences p
the lower half of 108th served by that segment of
f, Councilor 7ohnson asked if the number
traffic onto for a local street. Senior PI
the road standard anner be any
Liden
indicated yes. She also questioned whether iontronloath.
more development in the most soSenior
utherly Po
ed there is little
in that area due to thland
Planner Liden indicatleft for develop
e floodplain.
public Hearing Closed
NOVEMBER 24, 1986
page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES -
h. Councilor Brian questioned whether Kent Drive or Riverwood Lane
was the legal name of the street. Senior Planner Liden indicated
that it was proposed as Kent but the plat would be approved as
Riverwood. Councilor Brian asked if the name would require any
change in the approval. The response was no.
i. Councilor Johnson moved that staff prepare an ordinance changing
the street designation of 106th from minor collector to local
standard south of Kent Drive/Riverwood Lane. The motion was
seconded by Councilor Edwards.
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
j . Legal Counsel stated he agreed with Mr. Sharp that the issue of
the 25 foot centerline right—of—way needs to be interpreted. By
looking at the language he felt the intent was to apply to the
entire length of the property.
Mayor Cook asked Community Development Director if the policy in
the past included the entire length of the property. Community
Development Dirictor indicated that historically it was viewed in
this manner.
8. PUBLIC HEARING — ENGLEWOOD SUBDIVISION EASEMENT VACATION
a. Public Hearing Opened
b. Acting City Recorder stated that City Council passed a resolution
in October to call for a public hearing and initiate the vacation
request for an easement. There has been no concern addressed by
the utility companies. She noted that the land would be used to
allow for a residential expansion.
C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
d. City Recorder stated staff would recommend approval with the
condition that the ordinance would not be effective until the
31st day after it's passage and that the ordinance would be filed
with Washington County Records and Surveyor. The Planning
Commission and Engineering staff have also recommended approval.
e. Public Hearing Closed
f. ORDINANCE NO. 66-56 AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE FIVE FOOT SIDE LOT
UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 201 WITHIN ENGLEWOOD NO. 3
SUBDIVISION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon to adopt
with conditions.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND ZONE CHANGE FINAL ORDERS
9.1 ORDINANCE NO. 86-57 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-86
AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-86 PROPOSED BY GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION.
Page 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 24, 1986
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
9.2 ORDINANCE NO. 86-58 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CIPA 10-86
AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-86 PROPOSED BY BETHANY ASSOCIATES.
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
9.3 ORDINANCE NO. 86-59 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY DELETING SUB-SECTION 10.28.110(c),
RELATING TO A DESIGNATED FIFTEEN MINUTE PARKING LIMIT ZONE ON A
PORTION OF SW 87TH AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9.4 ORDINANCE NO. 86_60 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING
CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION
10.28.137(2) RELATING TO A DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE ON SW 87TH
AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
a. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Johnson to
adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
10.1 Receive and File:
a. Department Reports
10.2 Ratify Council Decision of November 3, 1986 to Uphold Planning
Commission and Staff Recommendation for Denial of Requests for
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Change Requests:
a. Nordling, Scott 6 Martin - CPA 8-86 6 ZC 16-86; ResM86-_
b. United First Federal Savings - CPA 9-86 b ZC 17-86
ResM86
10.3 Approve Training Request - Public Works Operations (Wastewater) -
$340
a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon to approve
Consent Agenda.
b. Councilor Eadon questioned the time and location for training per
item 10.3. Community Development Director stated that City
vehicles will be used and the staff will return to Tigard all
three days. Councilor Eadon was interested in the total amount
y of time to spent between the seminar and traveling. Community
_ Development Director clarified by stating that an adjustment will
be made during the week in order to avoid overtime compensation.
Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 24, 1986
c. Councilor—Elect John Schwartz noted that if two or more people
are traveling to a training session the only person considered
on—duty is the driver of the vehicle.
d. City Administrator indicated that we will meet FSLA rules. He
also stated the City's policy regarding per diem expenses.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
11. NON—AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff
11.1 AWARD FROM ASPHALT PAVING ASSOCIATION OF OREGON
a. City Engineer informed Council that this award was related to the
68th Parkway LID project. An inspector in the Engineering
Division, Mr. Bob Thompson, nominated the project for the award
and it came in first place in the region. The plaque will be
presented to the City and the consulting firm at the Asphalt
Association's meeting on December 13, 1986. The Association has
invited a representative from the City to receive the award and
the City Engineer questioned if Council wished to attend.
Councilor Eadon suggested that a staff member would be more
appropriate to attend the ceremony.
Councilor Johnson inquired as to the person who specifically
oversaw the project. Community Development Director recommended
Bob Thompson. He stated there are two complimentary tickets and
recommended that Bob be allowed to take his wife. Council
concurred.
RECESS RFGULAR MEETING: 9:00 PM
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session
at 9:03 PM under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) 6 (h) to discuss
labor relations and current/pending litigation issues.
13. ADJOURNMENT: 9:45 p.m.
i
tom%
xCityecorder — City of Tigard
ATTEST:
Mayor — City of Tigard
LW/sb:4485A
Page 7 — COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 24, 1986
z
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY L09M
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice 7-6850
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ,,„_ _ , _ / coaly
Legal Notice Advertising 2, 1 19-86 cG�--
4 • City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice e 'a ' (sG =IG.ARD
PO Box 23397 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit
•
Tigard, Or 97223
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASH GTON, )as'
1,— Anne Jean
being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising
Director,or his principal clerk,of tho-T i g a r d m;m e s
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at m; 9 a r d In the
aforesaid county and state; that the
�jo ice of Enizie o3 No #1 Subdivision
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for____5 successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
n + o 3 40 � o R�-]ltas--�fii-l�+--��rl�-•-
Subscribed a fore me this I'nv_ 2 Q. 8 6,_
R tary Public for Oregon
My Ccw4alselon Expo: 9120/88
AFFIDAVIT
�r
a
TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Noetf 0 7_6872
P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360
BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising
1 �B6
0 ❑ Tearsheet Notice '
• City of Tigard �► (lf �IGAR�
r
PO Box 23397 0 ❑ Duplicate Affidavit �►�
Tigard, Or, 97223
0
A.`
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF OREGON•
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON. )�
i, t
being first duly sworn. depose and sa�rat
a I Tn I" Advertising
e s ertising
Mector,or his principal clerk,of the
a newspaper of Weal circulation as defined in OR 19i.010
he
and 193 020;published at_
aforesaid county and state.that tFie
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for --1-----_succeasive and
consecutive in the following issues:
NO-v. 20, 1986
Subscribed and am bdoro me this.
ry Public for Oregon
my am Expirm 9/20/88
AFFIDAVIT
s
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington) ss
City of Tigard )
I, _ r rh being first duly sworn, on oath depose
and say:
That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of
Notice of Special Meeting for the Council Meeting dated November 24, 1986
(yVaC11r4yPp .SPssjon) I , a copy of said notice being hereto attached and
by reference made a part hereof, on the 20th day of November 1985.
1. City of Tigard Civic Center, 13125 Sial Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon.
1
Subscribed and sworn to before me this , day of -JL4J/e'W&e_- 1980.
0000F ♦ Notar Public for Oregon
ARCNA K. NT My Commission Expires:
v.'JTARY PUBLIC -- OREGON
�N. amw+«ssw Expires_ ......
A.A
November 20, 1986
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
Notice is hereby given that a special Executive Session Council meeting,
called by the Mayor with the common consent of the Council, will be held on
November 24, 1986, at 7:00 PM in the Tigard Civic Center Conference Room,
13125 SW Rall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of
holding an Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (e) to
discuss real property transactions. '
- o E. Cook, Mayor
4312A
�t
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In the Matter of the Proposed
COUNCIL ADOPTED ORDINANCES
STATE OF OREGON }
County of Washington) ss
City of Tigard )
1.-(Y VLX kk.:XY C,\ being first duly sworn, on oath depose
and say:
That I poste in the following public and conspicypus places, a copy of
Ordinance Numbers caLan
which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated
copy.$) of said ordinance(s) beim hereto attached and by reference made a
part hereof, on the _4 day of i .�v���F,,l 1986.
1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon
3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,� day of ��_, 198$.
� t
K i Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires: q-a 8-87
r '=`Y.'N 'c..: `;. =,yy.''- 'v„:n0.-•.
M
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 86-_=g
AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE 5' SIDE-LOT UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 201 OF
ENGLEWOOD NO. 3 SUBDIVISION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to
Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the reason and purpose for this vacation is to return the utility
easement to the property owner due to construction encroachment difficulties;
and
WHEREAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with QRS 271.100, and TMC Section 15.08.110, the
Council fixed a time and place for the public hearing and the Recorder
published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and
`WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation
area and all owners in the affected area, as described in ORS 271.080; and
WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on October 13, 1986, finds the
public interest will not be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS
271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the
request to vacate the utility easement area within said subdivision because
the public interest will not be prejudiced;_and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following condition is necessary to vacate
said land:
The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this
ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of
this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk,
Assessor, and Surveyor.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of the 5'
Side-lot utility easement within Lot 201, Englewood No. 3 Subdivision as
described on the attached Exhibit "A" and shown on the attached Exhibit "B",
and by this reference made parts hereof.
Section 2: The Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be
subject to the following condition:
ORDINANCE NO. 86-4,'�
Page 1
• The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this
ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of
this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk,
Assessor, and Surveyor.
Section 3: In no situation shall this ordinance beffective the Mayor the 31st
oval b
day after its enactment by the City Council and app Y
PASSED: By �.lftaLn� vote of all Council members present after
being read by number and title only, this �_ day
of 1986.
4orLeen R. Wilson, Acting Recorder
APPROVED: This -t11 om r— day of &&L) 1986.
ota Cook, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO 86--r�
Page 2
EASEMENT VACATION
Exhibit "A"
A tract of land in the northwest quarter of Section 34, Township 1 South.
Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, city of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
described as follows:
8aginning at the southwest corner of Lot 201, Englewood III, a recorded
plat. Washington County Plat Records. thence North 740 10' East, on the south
line of said Lot 201, 109,31 feet • to the southeast corner thereof; thence
North 40 20' 39" East, 5.33 feet; thence South 74" 10' West 111.19 feet to the
east right-of-way line of S.W. 115th Avenue; thence on said right-of-way line
on a 325 foot radius curve concave to the west (the chord of which bears South
160 16' 16" East, 5.00 feet), 5.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing
approximately 550 square feet.
cn/149
�tt:
y.
_ a 9~ OOQ a� Exhibit "Ba O
/% O r~
x O
* o ec'tr v �•
• QC
w .1` x'se= — m e z-
��- OD
e N � 4i � �� t0 N ^ �A
to • !� q �r N $ vt
M ON
t Ci'K{ wN
OD
N m
O N O =i
N is +�'� N to « IA s}
it fl d N N
a
N
ttatO O g at0 N 0 f� i
c N to
N N Cs�19 . N N M
•� LO'LL N
T 3N�I SO;; {lOQ{V1NQ110�
•
r,,� „� s►
OT H Ct oC*9t pC'CL N ,J ti
N
9a10 to 0
N Y M OM w O f 00 91 B O N rs N
o� O M R N S 40 N O lV N <
. MOC'itslit t-
O
�s� f ..-.
ti ZW
40
en 0
v t0 0
,n O $ v NN
- M ti h
O !s N
SO •1 CIL ` 6
* A r
s s p nN
O A
.y1511 fO� `emsO% 65,03 TTea
! Q '
4 ee 4 st S 0 N • 0
O • +• !� C
der • . M1Q !,i
s ~ f0 01 4p9 Yp 1 OI•. f 8
Ln w cc
aT.T1 � — � ,dfl
sCi « tD ® � r, A.%
N
O O
in 0
21 co
f-4 co
O ao eo p O e O ccYa
v�t'fs /'i Vl g cya�0 N ON1 N 0
y • 01
« a O to
•Ii, w ago O .� 01 �1
01 ff �� ICN e1
r ��+ �n Y• C11 4OOL
1r'YO M'Ot r
01
r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
s ORDINANCE NO. 86— S
}
TO APPROVE
PLAN
VE
AN ORDINANCE AND FINDINGS
ZONE CHANGE�(ZCS 15-86) PROPOSEDABY GEORGIAIPACIFIC
AMENDMENT (
CORP.
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Heavy
Industrial to Light Industrial and a Zone Change from I—H (Heavy Industrial)
to I—P (Industrial Park); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on October 7. 1986 and
recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the City Council on November 3, 1986
to consider the Commission recommendation.
3
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as
discussed below:
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan
Policies 2.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.3, and the Locational Criteria
for industrial development (Section 12.3). Since the Tigard
Comprehensive Plan has recently been acknowledged by LCDC, it is
no longer necessary to address the Statewide Planning Goals.
The City Council has determined that the proposal is consistent
with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon
the findings noted below:
a. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and surrounding property owners were given
notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the
applicant's proposal.
b. Policy 7.1.2, 7.6.1, and 8.1.3 are satisfied because
adequate service capacity for public water, sanitary sewer,
storm sewer, fire protection and streets exist. Specific
arrangement to utilize these facilities will be made when
the property redevelops.
C. Policy 12.3.1(b) is satisfied because the basic components
of this policy are addressed as follows:
SITES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE:
(1) "Suffered from residential areas to assure that
privacy and the residential character of the area are
preserved."
The site does not abut any residential area.
. .. flItDIMIAI�G
-NO
- .., N
r
street
that
(2) "Locate on anarterial
shallr notbe
and rough
industrial traffic
residential areas."
The site has access directly to S.W. 72nd Avenue,
which is designated as a major collector.
hape
ich
(3) "Thesite shall be of a size and and long range needssof thehuse,,will
provide for short
The property under consideration will be available for
use and/or redevelopment. The site area, about eight
acres, is adequate in sizo and shape for both the
short and long range needs for the envisioned
development.
(q) "The land intended for development shall have an
average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that
nearing
it can be demonstrated that through en�n9ae the
techniques all limitations to development
provisioned services can be mitigated."
The site meets this criteria, and has been partially
developed.
(5)
,it can be demonsiraetafdc�hawillassociated
inter Brelights,
with the
and other externa properties."
activities and uses on surrounding Pro P
to the
are used similarly
past and potential use of from the futuro
The surrounding properties
the subject Property.
Therefore, will
external efects
be compatiblef
development with nearby activities-
(6)
(6) All other applicable plan policies can be met
As demonstrated previously, when addressing the lCOC
the
Goals. all applicable Plan policies are met by
proposal.
Section 2: The City
Ids the Planning Commission's
Ancil upholds comprehensive Plan land Use
recommendation for approval of the Comp
Map and Zoning Map Amendment as set forth in Exhibit "A" (map).
Section 3: This ordinance shall become f c tive the Mayoron e 31st day after its
passage by Council and approval
CIRQII�iANt ;.111d. Sb—
PASSED: BY .,.,,
vote of all Council members present after
being read by number and� title only, this G� da' of ...�osJerr�b�,.••
1986. Y
Loreen R. Wilson, Acting City Recorder
APPROVED: This ('Jr)- da h
Y of l�� /e.r(. oa...- 1986.
/140 rt E. Cook, Mayor
KSL:bs212 [.
w
1
ORJIINANCE NO.
0494 3
a�-
OR 1+1005
12
Q �
.E'
g s �
0
1
40 A
`Y
�' �� �1, •�
W
ul �8
✓�; 4n
cc
41
V
4 • _ F :
J
tog O O[s
z 77
L,„ fe
_
/71
t sosa w �. 4 a '�
bra ,
t �n
• coo
<< �f at
co
� X
�.
• L k
gk
~~ FFF
co
A ILL
wo
en
ca
LLI
all
r
G
+�+ $ to $ w
14
co ti 1t Is
�
® Bis 1. .00.0 M
Q �
sea: 06
�•vC •��
�V
dt
ij
Of
Ce
up A SO
J
"•n � 1
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 86- .
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT (CPA 10-86) AND ZONE CHANGE (ZC 15-86) PROPOSED BY BETHANY
ASSOCIATES.
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from
Commercial Professional to Commercial General and a Zone change for C-P
(Commercial Professional) to C-G (Commercial General); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on October 7, 1986 and
recommended approval with the addition of a (P-0) Planned Development overlay
zone; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the City Council on November 3, 1986
to consider the Commission recommendation; and
WHERion
City Council
ilehd upon the hearings. theCouncilit makes thein this efrom the following findings inothissmatter:
City
1. Section 19.22.040 of the Tigard community Development Code
establishes detailed standards that are to be used to make a
on
regarding a request to amend the plan and zoning map through
quasi-judicial procedure. A request for such an amendment must
therefore address these standards as a part of its application.
These standards include:
a. Statewide Planning Goals :
b. Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1. 4.1.1, 5.1.1,
5.1.4, 8.1.3, 8,2.2, 9.1.3 and 12.2
C. Applicable stardards of the Community Development Code section
18.30.120.
d. Evidence of:
-- a change in the neighborhood or community, or
-- a mistake or inconsistency in the plan or map as relates to
the property
e. Evidence that the change will not adversely affect the health,
safety and welfare of the community.
2. Statewide Planning Goals no longer need to be addressed because the
City Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged by LCDC.
3. Comprehensive Plan policies have been properly addressed in the
following manner:
603:0 NCE N0, 86 10
4
Z
a. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice
of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's
proposal.
b. Policy 5.1.1 is met because the applicant has shown that a
partial rezoning of the property will more likely be able to
satisfy local market demand and subsequently provide job
opportunities for local residents.
C. Policy 5.1.4 is satisfied because the proposed change will not
enlarge the area presently designated for commercial use and
will not encroach upon nearby residential are&.
d. Policy e.1.3 will be satisfied as a condition for development of
the site. Before any commercial development occurs. City
approval through the Site Development Review or Condititional
Use process will be required.
e. Policy 9.2.2 is satisfied because the site is served by Tri-Met
and bus users will be able to commute to this site.
f. Policy 9.1.3 is net because the change in Plan and zone
designations will better provide for local services that nearby
residents now must leave the immediate area to obtain. This
proposal will help minimize the length of vehicular trips.
g. The applicable Locational Criteria in Section 12.2 of the Plan
have been satisfied.
1) A residential zoning district is only adjacent along the
southern boundary of the site.
a
2) Access
The access traffic analysis presented demonstrates that the
proposed rezoning does not create a traffic safety problem
and that the overall impact upon adjacent streets will be
minimal and the level of service for Scholls ferry Road,
Sorrento Road, or North Dakota Street will remain unchanged.
When reviewed in 1985, the traffic signal at Scholl* Ferry
Road/Sorrento Road/North Dakota Street had not been
installed and the improvement and widening of Scholls Ferry
Road had not been scheduled by the State Highway Division
for 1989. The City Engineering Division and State Highway
Division concur with the traffic study with the
understanding that specific access points will be further
evaluated during the Site Development Review or Conditional
Use process.
Direct access to an arterial and collector street is
available.
. -0M1y
Public transportation is available on Scholls Ferry Road.
ORDINANCE NO. etr
'>Paga 2,
.u„ y. r. ,tet
3) Site Characteristics
The applicant has shown that the site will accommodate Council
the
uses proposed for the property. However,
expressed at the hearing
shares the concern that was
regarding the negative impacts associated with a larger
scale commercial retail development. This concern is
heightened since standard Community Development Code
provisions do not prohibit the use of the remaining area
zoned C-P to be used to satisfy parking and landscaping
requirements for a project occurring on the land to be
zoned C-G. Although this scenario is not intended by the
applicant, tis essential to modify
he Council finds that it
se
tions
that
the requestwill d occur on thedipropertythe to in ensure manner
development
proposed.
The property is flat h Dakota Streetility from either
Scholls Ferry Road or North
4) Impact Assessment
hould
As noted in item 3) above, ommQrcial of developmentoswhich
be limited so as to result
is most beneficial to and compatible with nearby
residential neighborhoods. ited
In addition to Chet , Code
scala of the anticipated development on the proper escaping.
requirements relating to building setbactks.Development or
lighting, etc. will be employed during
Conditional Use review.
4. Evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community.
The applicant has demonstrated that si�g�inp�Q� ichangn the
°sreport
taken place since 1963. The development
represents a combination of projects that were anticipated by
the Plan (e.g. , Meadow Creek Apts) and unforeseenThesethave.all
Beaverton School District sale of surplus land).
contributed to a change in the demand for commercial services.
g, Evidence of a mistake or inconsistency in the Plan. ,
The marketing analysis has shown that the demand for
neighborhood professional office services (e.g.. physicians,
travel agencies) can be better satisfied with smaller sites in
more locations rather than fewer large sites. These office uses
zoni
are permitted in the C-G zone as well and the prop Ted analysis
<,
will not prohibit them on the subject property.
also shows that there is a surplus of land zoned C-P rovide
deficit of land zoned C-G. This proposal will help p
additional commercial needed in the area.
�=4
a:
ORDINANCE NO. 86-
page 3
6. Evidence that the change will not adversely affect the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
�• The traffic impact on this proposal will be minimal and coupled
with the site and street improvements that will be required in
conjunction with the development, no adverse impacts are
anticipated.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as
discussed above.
Section 2: The City Council upholds the recommendations of the Planning
staff and Planning Commission with the following modifications
and conditions:
a. The eastern 2.9 acres of the site shall be redesignated for
Commercial General development in the Comprehensive Plan
and C-G (Commercial General) on the Zoning Map. The
northwest corner containing 1.0 acre will be .redesignated
for Commercial Neighborhood development in the
Comprehensive Plan and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) on the
Zoning Map. This amendment is illustrated in Exhibit "A"
(map)
b. Commercial development occurring within a zoning district
shall not utilize space outside of the respective zone to
satisfy parking or landscaping requirements prescribed by
the Community Development Code.
Section 3: This ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day
after its passage by Council, and approval by the Mayor.
PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after
being read by number and title only, this � day
of AJO AM69A - 1986.
Lorean R. Wilson, Acting City Recorder
t, APPROVED: This ��r`� day of � ,e:- 1986.
v
,ofi E. Cook, Mayor
cn/165
s
OitOYE lli0.. 86- �-
§ � 3aF' ..H � .,� s_�"_�s wo^_i 5.< n.,age � • ,a�.k*a
e
I ;
dc
SCVjOLLS
W -
S,
300
7_93 AC.
401 1.0 APS �
X 3,59 lc. ��� •tom
i
W -
cn
SEE MAP .
1g f 33RD io, ,
NO
db ;
400
M
L-
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 86—_'M
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY DELETING
SUB—SECTION 10.28.110(c), RELATING TO A DESIGNATED FIFTEEN MINUTE PARKING
LIMIT ZONE ON A PORTION OF S.W. 87TH AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Tigard City Council that the fifteen
Ziparking limit zone on S.W. 87th Avenue is no longer necessary since the
public in general and businesses therealong will be better served by creation
of a loading zone thereat;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That Sub—section 10.28.110(c) of the Tigard Municipal Code,
relating to a designated fifteen minute parking limit zone on S.W. 87th
Avenue, be hereby deleted.
:f
Section 2: That the City Administrator be, and he is hereby, authorized and
directed to cause to have the area in which a designated fifteen minute
parking limit zone is marked and signed, as set forth above, cleared of such
markings and signing.
Section 3: Inasmuch as this parking zone removal is necessary to protect the
health, safety and general welfare of the public, an emergency is recognized
to exist and is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage and approval by the City Council and posting by the
City Recorder.
s PASSED: By {X1.17 i h7nri s vote of all Council members present after
being read by number and title only, this day
of �AJ..�kr,.,l,Q,r- 1986.
Loreen R. Wilson, Acting City Recorder
APPROVED: This day of 1986.
eA
. Cook, Mayor
mj/39
ORDINANCE NO. 8b-,
Page i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
/ t
ORDINANCE NO. 86-4?-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
k
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.28.137(2) RELATING TO, A DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE
ON S.W. 87th AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1; That Section
2for3apecified hours of usagecib�el anted thersameii �s
to a designated loading zone
hereby amended to read as follows:
010.28.137 Loading Zones — Designated. The following Portions of public
streets within the City of Tigard are designated as loading zones for the
hours indicated:
eeaee
(2) Within the easterly half of S.W. 87th Avenue, beginning at a point thirty
feet southerly of an easterly extention of the south boundary line of S.W.
Center Street and, thence, running southerly sixty feet. he described zone
T
,
is designated as a loading zone between the hours of nine a.a. to three p.m.,
Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excluded."
Section 2: That the City Administrator be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to cause to have the area in which parking is limited, as above set
forth, suitably posted in the manner provided by law.
Section 3: Inasmuch as this parking restriction is necessary to protect the
health, safety and general welfare of the public, an emergency is recognized
to exist and is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage and approval by the City Council, and pasting by the
City Recorder.
PASSED: By 1� ''�'��„ �•c_ vote of all Council members present after
being read by number and title only, this day
of 1r,.►._,., ,_ 1996.
oreen R. Wilson. Acting City Recorder
APPROVED: This f i day of ,�,)r����.. •- _ . 1986.
Cook, Mayor
aiho
r:
ORDINANCE No. 96-1,20
; . 1 _
e y (C S.No It/451
y.° p p
s
CS. 6833 •
4 •4 X14�9
a • v' p4
w» 1 p
C.5. e2e34) Q.•
g : o� `yo�• \Zp\
CS. 5283 u
3970 SCIS q1• y� N `
191.16 stip i �\ \
3301 w M' 1N +t9t
1tN.7iT + 6.46A( ° s` ITIAL POINT !� Cal
`� W
4400
9
.106
go 66
M �
327 CS• 10044
J9 At � � � � 3
4403 w .� ! •
Ib
� .aMr)
•,. Zia �•,,;-
tj
4601'% 4900
.09 Ar o ••°+ .27Ac.
4600 . 5102
w4500 �� ��
MAa b 5000
.27Ac. C
5100 �i�� N" %
t
V .
f��* 4 5106 c.
N
D 4
W
Q
.ST
.5'/T I47-10AI
5
V
IC S.No 11'1451
cS. 6833 •
cut
y'
a () 81
a o •
C S. 828310 o�•
94
a C.S. 5283
S�T•36'E
W
3301
p •' '^ \'16 w
1st lT aR •6.I.6.46A �°e r ITIAL POINT
4400 \ /
.06
00
r_& 10044
W
4405 4- ' soAv.-hist2mg—
s,A.�
a
4403 .Y
,• �•s moo,�
IFAI
cs
4 4XV41
�? 87 Ac s a
Ida \O -b
0
460i '\ w•/' 4900 Z Vt
09 At •o e�u+ �+.27At.
4600 a 5102
OSAC'¢ MAC. b 5000 lbk QQ.
.27Ac. sel
5100
r 3���t�• S i• s
®� ��Ice •. li 5106 '. a'+� + Cj �•
dY� .1BAc 1 •
N
•° D 4
. W �
l Tic QE ce��TEd,
D �
o S eoAlWler 06AIE s
AGENDA ITEM 0 2 — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE 11/24/86
(Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council
wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you
first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City
Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you.
NAI' 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED
DATE 11/12/86
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (please print the inforaation)
Item Description: „t - SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE
REVISIONS
•**+Ar#*#*RIIR#*k�R*R#*****#tR11#**#*****tk#R#Jo***#R***##R**R*R##�R**R*+R*R##*+R*R#*****
Proponent (Bor Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
Ns", Address and Affiliation Naas, Address and Affiliation
t
• lkRr�tArR*fnR#**!**+R***#*#*#*aR�R****f�'!*RR�ftlt*R***Rr*it#*i***�**Ar*****aAaR#R**Rr*****R#*#r
ti
DATE r r js�jsr�
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
Item Description: #5 - DOVER LANDING REVIEW DP 2-86
**11lMlFltfk�kfkit*AtMskfkalk/tft�lllt*RkIkA�*irfk1t1t11AlMit1M*Iklk�Ir/MIMltlk�lt*�t�41Flr�ltlF��1k*�FAirltiirlk+R�t�1llM�IrlihiRll*ilk
Proponent (Por Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
**+�*seae:ts4>t*>t*rk>4�t>4rt>ett*****irie,t**eke**eirt�*+reert,ter*a*it*�r*tte#ir*eiree*�r�k*tk****cert*tt+t*e,�
Nme, Address and Affiliation Matte, Address and Affiliation
/afes SW Rw R wo4a Lv
`hy
r
a,ke**�k�k,�r.*e.eee,k,k�k�k*e*e*.#*t,k*.rte,kit,t.>krt,k.,k�k,k**:**e,ke*ra,kite*eek**eek*e*e**,�ttr�ke*+k*�t
z
l
WITS 11/24/86
(� I Wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print the information)
Item Description: #6 -- ENGLEWOOD SUBDIVISION EASEMENT
VACATION
ataRarakat*stat***Bate***atatataratatarataaakatatatatate,�*e*ee**a***e*�r*�r*+re*e,�e****eae**ee**,te**e**ee
Proponent (Por Issue) Opponent (Against Issue)
atatatataaatatatatatatataratatatatatatatatatat*atatatat stat eatatatatatataeatatatatrtatatatatatatatatatatatatatat+tatatatat*ata�atata►�ratatatatatatatatatat
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
Y
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON J
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: Novembers3q, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 3 1986
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Economic PREVIOUS ACTION: Adoption of Resolution
Development Role Discussion No 83-103 on November 7,_ 1983
PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Economic Dew. Committee
POLICY ISSUE
Should the City Council revise resolution No. 83-103 which created the
Economic Development Committee.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
During the Council/Economic Development Workshop, the Committee expressed
concern about its role and responsibilities. To better define the role, the
Committee was asked to generate ideas. On September 16, 1986, the Economic
Development Committee discussed proposals to modify Resolution No. 83-103 to
reflect the role of the Economic Development Committee. Attached is a copy of
Resolution No. 83-103 and the draft minutes of the Committee meeting. The
Economic Development Committee will present proposed changes at the October
13, 1986 City Council meeting.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Review the Economic Development Committee's proposed changes and take
action.
2. Review the Economic Development Committee's proposed changes and delay
action.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Review the Economic Development Committee's proposed changes and take action
a►s appropriate
/br178
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 83— /03
IN THE MATTER OF CREATION OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 83-99.
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan, contains an Economy
Element which identifies the need for an Economic Development Program. and
WHEREAS, the element calls foe the creation of an economic development
steering committee to assist the: City in developing and implementing an
economic development program, and
WHEREAS. the Director of Planning and Development has worked with a
steering committee to formulate an economic fact sheet describing the City and
its resources. and.
WHEREAS, the Director has now recommended the formation of an official
Economic Development Committee to build upon the comprehensive plan and the
work of the steering committee, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has indicated its interest in forming on
i
official Committee. i
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City of Tigard hereby creates the Economic Development Committee
to work with the Director of Planning and Development to. prepare an
economic development plan for the City.
2. The Committee will consist of nine members, no more than two of whom
may be non residents of the City of Tigard. to be appointed by the
City Counc;'_. Initially, four members will be appointed for two year
terms acid four for one year terms. The remaining position, that of
the Mayor. will run continuous with the term of office. Subsequent
appointments, except that of the Mayor, ball be for two year terms
except where an appointee is completing the unexpired term of a
previous committee member. Committee members shall receive no
compensation.
3. The Committee shall be composed of the following nine members:
a. The Mayor of Tigard
b. A representative of the Tigard Triangle Area.
C. A representative of the Central Business District.
d. A representative of the North Tigard/Cascade Blvd. area.
e. A representative of the .72nd Avenue Industrial area.
f. A commercial banking representative.
g. An at large member.
h. An at large member.
i. An at large member.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-L3
r
4. The Director of Planning and Development and a representative of the y
Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce will serve as ex-officio members.
5. The Committee is authorized to create special subcommittees and
enlist the aid of private citizens to study special areas of concern
and assist in the compilation of area inventories.
6. The Committee shall meet at least once in every calendar month at a
specified time and place.
PASSED: By the City Council on the �Tfh day of NovgMI)er _i. 198
ATTEST:
00,
City Recordeirl Mayor - CjtF o
f T40iN
APPROVED TO FORM:
City Attorney
- r
RESOLUTION 83-)0-3
Jy ,
(WAM:dmj(0215P)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the City Council October 13, 1986
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, 041v—
Community Development
SUBJECT: Economic Development Committee Role Discussion
The Economic Development Committee has suggested that. the City Council revise
the mission statement for the Committee contained in Resolution No. 83--103.
At its meeting of September 8, 1986, the Committee voted to request that the
Council modify the resolution by inserting the following directions:
1. The TEDC develop, for the City, a philosophy to attract new
businesses to the area.
2. TEDC enhance the existing business climate.
3. TEDC facilitate cooperation with neighboring communities on the
issues of: economic development, transportation and planning.
4. TEDC to act as an Ambassador to the Tigard Business community.
Promote doing business in Tigard.
5. TEDC participate in downtown plan development with staff 1986-81 .
(Further, it is suggested that an architectural review committee
be selected for downtown Tigard. )
6. TEDC participate in the Tigard Triangle pian development with
staff 1986-87.
The Committee desires to take a more active role in attracting new
businesses. The Committee has recently spent a considerable amount of time
developing ideas for a downtown improvement pian. Presently the Committee is
negotiating with Portland State University and the Oregon School of Design to
forts a framework to include classes from both schools in our downtown plan. (A
copy of an early memo from Kathy Budny and Susan Clark describing the proposed
is attached). The Committee has dedicated its resources to addressing the
workplan developed by the staff and Council. Now, the Committee wishes to
strengthen its direction and become more active in attracting new business to
Tigard.
With the recent approval by Council of additional staff in the Plannirnj
Division, we are able to offer adequate staff resources to keep pace with the
Committee's energies. I recommend that the Council approve the proposed
revisions to Resolution No, 83-103. If directed, the staff will then prepare
a new resolution for Council approval.
/br162
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1986
Pioneer Pies
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sue Clark, John Savory, Amo DeBernardis, Jim Corliss. Juanita
Caday ,and Todd Mains
OTHERS PRESENT: Geraldine Ball, Jeanne Caswell and Bill Monahan
The minutes of the August 26 meeting were reviewed and approved.
The Subcommittee of John, Amo, Jeanne, and Bill met on September 2 and discussed
possible revisions to Resolution No. 83-103 which created the Committee, Revision-,
suggested are:
1. The TEDC develop, for the City, a philosophy to ,ittract new businesses to thr
area.
2. TEDC enhance the existing business climate.
3. TEDC facilitate cooperation with neighboring communities on the issues of
economic development, transportation and planning.
4. TEDC to act as an Ambassador to the Tigard Rusinoss community . Promote doing
business in Tigard.
S. TEDC participate in downtown plan development with staff 1486-87. (Further, it
is suggested that an architectural review committee be selected for downtown
Tigard.)
6. TEDC participate in the Tigard Triangle plan developanent with staff 1986- 81
Furthermore, it is suggested that TEDC and the TrAnspor-tation Committee be joill d,
as they are interdependent. Specific business can be .allociated to subcommittov, in
the two areas.
The Committee will work to define further vt h of these yools .
• Susan reported that she and Kathy have developed ideas for the downtown design
competition. PSU was contacted and expressed interest. Susan described the intent
that PSU has in doing a class project on the downtown at a time convenient for the
City and the class. Susan and Kathy will continue to pursue the option with PSU at
the suggestion of the Committee.
Bill mentioned that the I-5 symposium will be held on October 8 Witt% Tigetrd a
participant. Tigard will be represented by Bill and the planning staff.
No developers were present. Bili reported on recent land use approvals And
commercial development.
Bill informed the Committee that he is proposing that the Planning Division br
split into two sections - Land Development and Planning Projects. If approved. 1.,0%
of the work program of one planner, Duane Roberts will bo committed to vcanumrt
development and business tax.
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 AM. Thr next meptirrna will be held on luandav
October 21. 1986 at 7:30 AM! at Pioneer Pies.
/br162
**** Notes on Project: Tigard Downtown design competitkon *•*••
Kathy Budny, Sue Clark
Project: $2,500 award for design for a future downtown core based on
economic development of current downtc-.•n; use the design model
to gain publicity and public/voter support of projects to
visibly enhance/improye downtown.
a) set limits of area, boundaries, setting of core (what surrounds it)
b) impact on traffic, limitations, history (previous projects, studies, etc.)
c) special information, ie, the railroad, possible 99 access for S-bound traffic,
efforts of various groups to motivate change
d) architectural design - mini-city, including existing buildings and businesses
e) design new buildings 4 businesses to fit into concept of downtown (style,
type, population, proximity to wash. Sq.)
1. how far in the future?
2. what type of growth in downtown?
3. what assumptions or info would designers need?
f) design and production of irformation packets? staff presentations?
g) marketing, design, community impact?
h) which school(s) should be approached? Eugene too far?
i) on what basis would the money be paid?
Goal: create some visual image of where Tigard MIGHT go with development
excite business support for change
gain voter support for Tigard's new image
Ask designers, "What can you do with what we've got?"
Kathy's contact with PSU: Carl Abbott, 229-4045 Urban Planning
Dntn revitalization class not offered this year
Vancouver had a model and slide program done by a class
National Main St. Center - note book and training
Some interest expressed, but for class project, not contest
2-3 terms in length
Definite need for professional planning staff's help
Project could become a major task, probably for city staff AND committee
meed to clarify project, expectations, commitments, etc.
w�
` I
� i
Format for Urban Design Process
city of'rmjard,Oregon *c
t i
t�
1
4
i.,
FFls
- r
ud"n Design workshop
or. Stefano Zegrettt
Dana Fadely
Portland Slate University
School of Urban Affairs
Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Portland,Oregon
t November 5, 1986
• Tasks Portland State University
City of Tigard
1 Data Base Inventory
Data Base
Background Program &Plans
Proposed Project EAstingARernatives
2 Community Participation 1
Authorities Community Interest Groups Client or Planning Team
Developer
3 Establish Existing and Projected Coalitions
1 I ;
Urban Function Urban Frame Urban Fabric Urban 0uality Aiternap
ives
Existing&Projected
4 Priority Setting & Design Alternatives
specific Altemative i 'Specific Alternative bl specific Alternative 11
5 Evaluation arsd Statement of Impacts
Urban Function Urban Frame Urban Fabric Urban Ousky
-
Adverse &Beneficial '
e
6 Means to Minimize or Maximize Impacts
_ Develop Means to Minimize Develop MeamtoM&*rrze _
Adverse Effects Beneticialimpacts
7 Alternative Selection and Adjustment ;
Action Plan _!
� t
Feedback & Review
------
Tasks Pertland State University
Cay at Tigard
1 Data ®ase Inventory {
f
General description of the project
—History, chronology. and statistical base-
-Purpose and design criteria
—Proposed program and plans
Description of project areas
—Physical.environment
—Socioeconomic environment ;
2 Community participation
Methods of citizen particotion
information from community
information to community
Modes
—Hearings and meetings
—Raft/IV/newspaper
_-Ouestionnaires
-..interview
—Workshops
—Others
The appropriate uses, advantages, and disadvantages
of various methods and modes—groups reached
Community involvement necessary to discern
—Mutuality of goals b user needs
—Dominant factors
—Priorities of issue
—Alternatives proposed or favored
3 Establlsh Existing and Projected Conditions
Urban Functions
.:-Existing conditions
—Projected conditions
Urban Frame
—Existing conditions
—Projected conditions
Urban Fabric
—Existing conditions
—Projected conditions
_ Urban Duality of Uis
—Existing conditions
—Projected conditions
a v
t
4 Priority Selling & Design Alternatives
Establishing quality indicators for conditions described
Above
—Urban design quality indicators (sources of value factors)
socioeconomic environment quality indicators(sources
of value tactors)
Presenting. comparing. and evaluating alternative schemes
Project physical program and plan
5 EvalwWon and Statement of impacts
6 Means to Minimize or Manimize impacts
Impact areas inclwde:
—Response to goals & objectives
�pgns"y. cooperation, and communication
—ProiOct p+ys W program & plans
—Project operation program & use
--Urban function. frame. and fabric
t.lrban quality of Me components
Overlapping impacts
Adverse impacts & means to minkiOze
Beneficial impacts & means to maximize
Ce
7 Aitrnative Selection and Adjustment
Final Action Plan
Feedback & Review
Management of assessment and review process
Assessment—review cycles with agencies & community
constituents
40nitorft interim resutts—testing by troth professional
analysis and user review
Feedback into design & funding decisions 6 stages
Feedback into local environmental inventories. plans,values
—Creation of local environmental base data for future use
s
i
Existing and Projected Conditions
A Urban Functlona !
A100 frnat#o tis
A101 Goats & objectives
A102 General criteria t
A103 Problems & potentials/trends & tendencies }
A104 Project organization & methodology
A105 Character of environment: physical & spiritual
A106 Government & laws I
A107 Regional context
A200 tsoclal funatiions
Am Character of community
A202 Demographic background & change
A203 Regional & local projections
A204 Lifestyle/user needs
A205 Social stratification/grouping
A206 Values. probwrq and potentials
A207 Worker/Resident isitor interface
A208 Displacement. relocation, and migration patterns
A300 Econoenlla hawt1oons
A301 Regional& kOcal projections
A302• City tax base
A303 Cost to city i
A304 F=easibility
A305 Marketability
A306 Employment
A307 Education
A308 Housing
A309 Business—large, small, mail order
A310 Commercial--retail, wholesale
A311 Tourism--commercial, recreational
A312 Agriculture—social factors, food resources
A313 industry—industrial planning
moo Natural and site functions
0
A401 Local ecology
A402 Local geology
A403 Topography
A403a —Slope gradients & contours
A403b —Special land forms and outcroppings
A403c —Suitability for development
A404 Soils
A404a -Composition & depth
A404b —Characteristics--permeability, loadbearing,
cohesiveness
A405 Vegetation
A405a -Trees/Shrubs
A405b• -Ground cover
A405c -Climate adaptability & density
A406 Wildlife
4
3jL.�'R� l Cif
�w. .s ..t• �Kx 4w �._ a at..� �. a.� „�xnrti.a _ .ar.��2a z:;t�.. ....�,.. - -'�`
A406b —Native types
A406c —Effect of development
A407 HYdrobgY
A407a —Availability
A407b Quality ,
A407c —Surface b subsurface
A407d —Movement. storage. and erosion
,A408 Mlcrocllmates
A408a —Sun an and orientation
A408b —Wind effects and directions
A408C —Shade/Shadow
A408d --Snow/Ice/Frovt action
A4080 —Rainfaq/Temperature/Humidity
A40g Natural hazards
A409a —Flood/Fite
A409b —Hurricane/Storm
A409C —Tornado
A409d —Earthquake
A410 Resources
A410a —Energy
A410b --Air
• A410c Water
A410d —Land/Parks
A410e —Minerals/Vegetations
A411 Pollution control
A412 Conservation b preservation of natural resources
A413 Max0lization of natural resources
ASO Cultural r
A501 History of area
A502 Heritage and Legend
A503 Archeological sites
A534 Aesthetics and literature
A 5;5 Museums, historic buildings, universities
A506 Local taste factors
ASO Standards and design for 1103111, safetY
and socurlty
A601 Fire safety codes
A602 Building codes—structural. heating, ventilating. air
conditioning, electrical, gas. plumbing
A603 Sanitation standards—water. sewage, waste
treatment. solid wastes
A604 Transportation standards—highway and traffic
engineering, railway, airport
A605 Health and safety standards
A606 Educational standards
A607 Labor standards
A608 Power standards
A609 Environmental standards
A610 Industrial process and equipment standards
welding. pressure vessel, piping
1
t
A700 Gluten reaction
A701 Defining goals & objectives }
A702 pros versus cons a
A703 Public awareness
A704 User needs
Information networks: 1
—Public officials
--Civic associations
—Public interest groups
—Neighborhood groups i
—Newspaper/Magazine/Newsletters
—Radio/TV/Movie clic expertise l
—individuals with spec
—Other
A705 Interpreting design & selection criteria
A706 Comparison of goals 6 objectives
A707 Risks & responsibilities
B Urban Franca
13100 AAasshq
8101 Form generators
-
8102 Gateways & barriers
8103 Centers & nodes
B104 Connectors. lines and interchanges
8105 Density. proportion, scale. and rhythm ;
_ $10€i Zoning. building heights, floor area ratios
Bt07 Spatial sequence. views. vistas
8108 Adjacency conditions: hard, soil
B109 Transitional zones & flexibility—directions.
signage, and visual pollution _
Bt 10 Building prototypes & groupings `=
8111 Historic massing =
B112 Urban frame analysis
B300 Land use
For: i
B201 —Residential
u 8202 —.Recreational •
B203 —Institutional
L 8204 —Commercial
B205 —Industrial
B206 —Agricultural
8207 —t.4ixed Uses
B208 Location, quantity. development units, amenities
B209 Fabric & focus elements
B2t0
Historic
district
systemsites
821.1 open
6212 Land values & availability of types
B213 Economic feasibility
6214 Existing generators
6215 pevelopment patterns & growth _
B2t6 Interaction of above & mixed use proportions
BS00 circulation
13301 Trattic projectors
8302 Modal split and demand
B303 Access patterns, origin and destination patterns
8304 Pubic transportation—PRT. air networks &
capacities
8305 Schedules, signage. and signals
8306 Automobile—primary & secondary networks i
& capacities
8307 Parking requirements, signage and signals
8306 Pedestrian & bicycle—networks & capacities
8309 Physical facilities—existing and Chang"
S310 Terminal facilities and statinnn
8312 Physical form of n9IW0lc—partial• kww- IMM
radial
8313 Interface and interaction of above
8314 Regional interface & interaction
8400 Intrastruch"
B401 Programs. future demands and goals. alternatives
Access to and quality of service facilities for:
8402 --Water—supply. treatment, storage. distribution
8403 —Sewer—collection, treatment. disposal
8404 —Storm/Flood—drainage systems. installation.
maintenance
8405 —Electric & gas—production.generation
& distribution
B406 —Lighting—streets& highways
8407 —Telephone—facilities and other communications
systems
8408 —Solid waste—collection. transport and disposal
8409 —Pollution controls: air. noise, water
8410 —Street amenities: public toilets. benches, bike
racks, fountains
8500 Public fadgties and sOnrieea
8501 Programs. future demands & goals. alternatives
Access to and quality of facilities for:
8502 —Fire—fire prevention
8503 —Police/Crime prevention
8504 —Emergency/Safety
8505 —Schools/Education
8506 —Health
8507 —Public transportation
Cy
i
{
f; Urban Fabric
COO Building programs i s:
C101 Goals & capacities ; x
C102 Building use 3 mixed use
C103 Adjacency diagrams of functions
C104 Square footage/acreage
C105 Number of floors, units, or rooms
C106 Substructures/Foundations
C107 Open space/Site coverage
C108 Architect's plans and Procedure { 3
C109 Con ruction techniques 3 materials: tabor
ava"bility
Cl 10 O wroes management policies and phasing _
C111 Public facilities& services cornpatability =
C112 Preservation b maximization of resources
C113 Urban function: urban frame fit
Cl00 Tri
C201 Comparative studies of building types Q design
C202 Materials& structure
C203 Texture &color
C204 Proportions b scale
C205 Visibility requirements
C206 Compati0ility with existing
C207 Landscaping b siting t
,- C20f3 Signage b visual pollution controls
C209 Alternatives
0300 Building land use Pratotypes
0301 Housing
C3018 —Site plan type--cluster. P.U.O.. site b service.
etc.
C301 b Unit b building types, plot b plot use
0301 c —Programming space for user needs, amenities,
schedules b family composition
C301d —Relationship to circulation 6 utilities systems
0301 a —Building system types and selection
C301 f —Building design, engineering & phasing
0302 Education and health
C302a —Programming space with educational & health
system goals. needs and schedule
C302b —Prototype development for various levels
C302e —Building systems types and selection
C302d —Building design, engineering and phasing of
schools. colleges. training centers, hospitals.
clinics and other health care and education
4f facilities
C303 Institutional facilities and public uses
C303a --Programming, building design. engineering
and phasing
C303b —Governmental administrative areas
C303c —Cultural, symbolic, or civic centers
- C303d —Libraries
K-:
i
C3o3e —Postal buildings .
03031 —Fire/Police stations
C3039 —Court houses
C304 Retail and commercial facilities
C304a —Community commercial centers
C304b —Local convenience services
C304c —Shopping mails. marketing places and bazaars
C304d —Regional malls, marketplaces and bazaars
_ C304e —Central business centers
C304f —office and administrative areas
C304g —Transient residential accommodations i
' C304h —Entertainment
0305 Recreation and entertainment facilities
C305a —open space systems--marks and recreation i
C305b —Playgrounds i
C305c —Gymnasiums
C305d —Tracks
C305e —Zoos
C3051 —Pools, rinks. courts
C305g —Arenas and athletic complexes
C305h —Stadiums
_ C306 Religion and community organization facilities ;
b
C306a —Reus and community buildings for town
center and neighborhoods
0307 industrial facilities
C307a —Distribution centers
C307b --Storaga facilities
C307c —Light manufacturing. service industry.
cottage kxkm ry t
C307d —Meavy industries
0308 Agriculture
C3083 —Existing and reversed use
C308b --Distribution centers
C308c —Storage facilities
C308d —Location
C308e —Water availability
C308f —Productive capacity
C308g —Livestock
C308h —Forestry r
. f
i
i
D Urban Quality of Uf® t
D100 The Synthesis,or how the parts come together
0200 The Composltlon or mix of all the elements
of eonswratlon ah--wo
0201 Proportion of percentage of elements
D202 Priorities or emphasis of elements
0300 The hvioracdon of all the dements
of caonsWsrauon above
0301 Degree of mutuality of goals and objectives
D302 Coordination. cooperation
0303 Overlapping of elements
0334 Critical mass
D305 Conflicts and compatability
D400 The Cho scfar or k""of aw k" place
D401 Physical and spiritual imageability
D402 Richness and variety to simplicity and clarity
D403 Chaos and insecurity to blandness and boredom
f
D500 The Well-belrq of the lndhrldual 1
D501 Physical end psychological
0502 Sol-reaib;atlon
D503 Options for privacy or sociability
0600 The Well-being of sacl,ei groupings
0601 Physical and psychological
D602 Activity groupings. amenities ;
0603 validity of groupings
D604 Purpose and fulfillment
D605 legal, governmental and social constraints
j
Basic Format for Downtown Analysis
Pu tlend State L%*#eisay
City of Yigwd
Information Required
1. Present land Inventory: Uses and Ownership(Hard and Sort)
2. Tax 8M Downtown. Property Tax Revenues,Land Values,Trends
3. Demographics(I"gard and surrounding communities):
Population increase
ease
Ago Croups ;
Income Groups
Ernployrnent(Hownnany Downtown?)
Processionals
Ffic,
4. Sao Analysis: Goobgy,Water-Drainage,Creek Water Level
S. Existing Services
6. Erbertabmr t In Tigard: Theaters,ft Mln%Etc.
i
mwicet Anavem(Fol oYAw Inventory)
1. Gurrerft Esamob®and Promotion of Population and Population Cornposbti�on
2. Space Avallabiilly In the South Metro Area
3. Collection of Data ftm Washington County
l
E
CA-d
DOWNTOWN LAND INVENTORY j ja
BLOG.Y.; 1 LOT NUMBER: 07 TAX LOT NO. : 2S1-2AA 906
ADDRESS: 12080 SW Main LAND AREA: 2.42 Ac
STATUS OF LAND: DOMINANT USE: General Retail Sales c19
OTHER USES: Park i facilities b8
OCCUPANTS: Pa less
CONSTRUCTION DATE: (CONDITION: goad —
BUILDING MATERIAL: Concrete Block
ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: 1358,400, BLDG,. : ti,075,700 TOTAL: $1,434,100
NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: PAVED: 117 UNPAVED:
AMOUNT OF BUILDING OCCUPIED/VACANT: Fully Occupied
FULL-TIM EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES: 36
VACANT COMMERCIAL: POTENTIAL USE (FORMER AND OTHER SUITABLE USES):
VACANT COMMERCIAL: CONDITIONS FOR REUSE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
NEEDED TO MAKE MARKETABLE)
OMER: (NAME) Monico Associates Pa less Drug
ADDRESS: 9275 SW Payton Ln Wilsonville, OR 97070 TELEPHONE: 682-4104
CONTACT PERSON (IF DIFFERENT): NAME: Mr. Hammelt Payless Real Estate Manager
ADDRESS. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 682-4100
' STATUS OR TERMS (SALE, RENT, LEASE, PRICE):
DEVELOPMENT PLANS, IF ANY: No decision regarding moving as vet. Would consider
relocation if Albertson's moved out.
OTHER:
djl9l/di3
i
DOWNTOWN LAND INVENTORY
,BLOCK: 1 LOT NUMBER: 01 TAX LOT NO. : 2S1-2AA 101
ADDRESS: 11900 SW Pacific Highway LAND AREA: .21 Ac
STATUS OF LAND: DOMINANT USE: Vehicle Fuel Sales c29
OTHER USES:
OCCUPANTS: Nine-T-Nine Service Station and Towing Service
CONSTRUCTION DATE: 1937 CONDITION: Good
BUILDING MATERIAL: Brick and wood siding
ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: $60,`000 BLDG. : X67;300 TOTAL: _ #127,700
NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: PAVED: 3 UNPAVED:
AMOUNT OF BUILDING OCCUPIED/VACANT: Fully occupied ---
FULL-TIM EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES: 7
VACANT COMMERCIAL: POTENTIAL USE (FORMER AND OTHER SUITABLE USES):
VACANT COMMERCIAL: CONDITIONS FOR REUSE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
NEEDED TO MAKE MARKETABLE)
4
OWNER: (NAME) Hoffarber Properties ADDRESS: 12005 SW Hall Blvd.
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 639-1468
CONTACT PERSON (IF DIFFERENT): NAME:
ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER:
STATUS OR TERMS (SALE, RENT, LEASE, PRICE):
DEVELOPMENT PLANS, IF ANY: None
OTHER:
dj181/dj3
DOWNTOWN LAND INVENTORY
BLOCK: 1 LOT NUMBER: 04 TAX LOT NO. : 24Z1-2AA 6Q2 01
ADDRESS: 11960 SW Pacific HiSbklaY _ LAND AREA: .89 Ac
STATUS OF LAND: DOMINANT USE: Eating and Drinking Establishment c1A
OTHER USES:
OCCUPANTS: Pioneer Pies
CONSTRUCTION DATE: 1960, 1983 CONDITION: good
BUILDING MATERIAL: Wood Siding
ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: J203,600 BLDG. : $260,000 TOTAL: $463,600
NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: PAVED: 28 UNPAVED: —
AMOUNT OF BUILDING OCCUPIED/VACANT:
FULL-TIM EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES: 35
VACANT COMMERCIAL: POTENTIAL USE (FORMER AND OTHER SUITABLE USES):
VACANT COMMERCIAL: CONDITIONS FOR REUSE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
NEEDED TO MAKE MARKETABLE)
OWNER: (NAME) McCall, W.C. __ ADDRESS: 9922 SW Montgomery, Spokane, WA
c/o Armstrong, Melvin L. 6 Richard R. Spokane, WA 99206
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 509-922-2260
CONTACT PERSON (IF DIFFERENT): NAME:
ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER:
STATUS OR TERMS (SALE, RENT, LEASE, PRICE):
DEVELOPMENT PLANS, IF ANY: None
OTHER:
djl81/dj3
4 fi
DOWNTOWN LAND INVENTORY
BLOCK: 1 LOT NUMBER: 13
TAX LOT NO. : 2S1-2AA 3301
ADDRESS: 12345 SW Hall
LAND AREA: .64 Ac —
STATUS OF LAND: DOMINANT USE: Multi le Famil Residential c4
OTHER USES:
OCCUPANTS: Tigard Terrace Apartments 24 units
CONSTRUCTION DATE: C. 1946 CONDITION: ood
BUILDING MATERIAL: Wood Sidin
ASSESSED VALUE: LAND: 86,bO0 BLDG. : 36b bO0 TOTAL: $453 200
NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING SPACES. PAVED: 32
UNPAVED:
AMOUNT OF BUILDING OCCUPIED/VACANT: INo vacant
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES: 1
VACANT COMMERCIAL- POTENTIAL USE (FORMER AND OTHER SUITABLE USES):
VACANT COMMERCIAL: noNDITIONS FOR REUSE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
NEEDED TO MAKE MARKETABLE)
OWNER: (NAME) Mills Marian J. Levenson Nina c o Cohen Barr
ADDRESS: 15303 Ventura Blvd. 9900
TELEPHONE:
Sherman Oaks CA 94103
CONTACT PERSON (IF DIFFERENT): NAME-- Mana er
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 620-2916, 25.5-6240
ADDRESS:
STATUS OR TERMS (SALE. RENT, LEASE, PRICE): i Bedroom, $270. 2 Bedroom $300
DEVELOPMENT PLANS, IF ANY: Rebuild stairs in December driveway recentl re ired.
OTHER:
dj181/dj3
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
GUIDELINE AND OBJECTIVES
1 . Confirm boundaries of CBD.
*2. Produce an inventory of current dountown.
(Business inventory as well as physical inventory. )
*3. Indentify topographical and geographical limitations
and opportunities. (Fanno Creek, drainage, existing
,stands of trees)
*4. Product a market analysis of commercial, retail,
professional, light industrial parks in this area
and the existing demand for more of each type.
K 5. Produce an analysis of land use zones in CBD,
enumerating disired changes and reasoning for doing
SO.
6. Identify capitol improvement projects needed in CBD.
7. Produce a report on most beneficial improvements/changes
desired in existing developed properties. (Signage,
landscaping, architectural styples. )
S. produce a report on marketing strate
gy for implementing
the total CBD developemnt.
* These items are currently being undertaken by Staff,
and some of these reports are in the final stages of
completion.
CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WORKSHOP AGENDA — November 24, 1986
6:30 P.M.
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER
1. Discussion of the Downtown Project
c City Council
project Scope
O Definition of what the overall scope of the project is. What do
we want to accomplish?
PSU"s participation and desired product. What is the goal of
pSU's study?
o Development of guidelines for PSU's project.
Roles of
e Economic Development Committee
0 PSU
A City Council
Funding Availability
2. Work Program
3. Adjourn
i
/br199
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES OF November 18, 1986
Pioneer Pie Restaurant — 7:30 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: John Savory, Kathy Budny, Amo De Bernardis, David Clement,
Susan Clark
Duane Roberts, Mrs. Ball, Bill Monahan
OTHERS PERSENT: Liz Newton,
The Committee approved the minutes of October 21, 1986.
with Stefano Zigretti and Valerie
Kathy reported on the November 5 meeting ct. Following the meeting, she felt
Johnson concerning the downtown proje
there is a lot that PSU can do for us. At issue is "what dterm one thWeC need
want
PSU to do? Valerie sees the project as a >i° tormine what they can do
y need. To d
;or
an objective for downtown, thate, the City staff has Q. PSU will j
for us and whatne to deciderces ewhat he Committee involvement should beprovided
data to PSU, we
Discussion centered on the need for the Committee ch rano f Ocus in on be accomplishedwhat
PSU P SU E
should accomplish for us. A smaller project,
in a short period time, may be desired. Ideas such as a plan of what Tigard's
ve or t
downtown will limitedoolike in f i which can be years, consistent signage area,
done which doesnot conflict with
or another
future projects were discussed.
The Committee determined that a five or ten year plan is desirable. A goal
such as:
,- eople off fto downtown,
et
identify how we can gp
the obstacles, whatattractions can be created•
— A defined limited boundary is needed.
Evaluate the information gathered by the staff on ownership, assessed
occupants of building, sale prices listed, detailed
value,
information on encumbered property, renovation plans.
Data is available
lot
ropert�iesblock
thatfare considering expansion.or downtown rDuane discussed
the plans for several p
John proposed that the Committee put in writing a proposal of what we expect
to be given to Stefano and the guidelines which we hope to stay within.
Susan suggested that PSU be advised that the Committee would like help in
these areas:
—Identify one goal for overall design — come up with
— a low cost option
— a no holds barred design for downtown option
The PSU study should consider access
— utility needs
— streets and bridges
— renovation of buildings
— construction needs for new buildings
— parking lots
4 �
Page 2
- Types of businesses which should be attracted
- Should a theme be used
- Are awnings or plantings useful
- These could lead to draft concepts which could be considered before a
model is made
-David suggested that we identify
' -What can be done to improve the commercial viability of Main Street?
What stragegies can be taken to focus on the types of shops, stores,
restaurants which are desired. An analysis of existing shopping
opportunity within a wide area would be helpful.
The project could include some market analysis coordinated with the
PSU business school.
Amo pointed out that we need to be realistic about what we expect from the
students. The committee would like the project to be a first step which then
can be built upon.
The committee discussed the option of merging with the Transportation
committee. They oppose merging the committees.
Discussion centered upon new developments planned and underway. Projects
discusses! included Albertson's, Tigard East, and the Tigard Family Drive In
site,
Copies of the Metro Vacant land Inventory and Market Assessment report were
distributed.
The meeting adjourned at 8:55 A.M.
/br197
ECONOMIC DEVELOPM T COMMITTEE WORKPLANS
FY 19SW
3u1r . SEtOA, ._.2st, ._sem , Doc,. 1•n. Feb,.
nsr. Apr, Ma�C .7uns
o Update E.D. Action Plan Review... Draft Recommendation CC•
(Rotation. Expansion s
Attraction...Retail/Ind.)
Budget? CIP Coordination...
o 72nd/Hm1ker Moods List
Budget?
o Triangle Needs List
o Casce Needs List Budget?
ad --
o seholls Ferry Rd./NW Arta Plan BV –TS Planning Consultant..
Review and Recommendation...
o Pacific H". Arta Plan
,;• o wmTOA AREA PLAN
r o Downtown Plan Baso Map...Block Inventory Update...Prepsvw Downtown Area Plan...Draft Plan...EDC Review L Revise CC?
o Downtown Park Plan Base Map... Park Board Downtown Plan Development... Draft Plan...EDC Review b Revise CC?
o
Publit Facilities Planning... CIP C Funding?
Downtown CZP
o CP/Mixed Uses EDC Review with staff...
-o Trans./Parkilq/Cireulation Existing Systems.—Traffic—Study...Report...Draft Transportation Plan...EDC Review t Revise CC?
............. .....a....................... Funding Strategy?
o Funding i Implementation Options t Alternatives Discussions-
0 1-5 Corridor Coordination Slide show Presentation? 1-4 Progrom? Marketing t Promotions...
.........................•S®NME .
Coop Plan Zonieoj, sign Code Roof SignsT .... ....
... ........
o Revive ..........................................................................•.... 'LCDC�Inventory�Update—,
o Development Review i Advocacy Marketing i Information...
j. ....................................................................................
a o Codes Enforcement and
>: seautification. Tani Hall Work Plan
o Ceuneil/Coawitteo Workshops Work Plan CC/Ep
•...............
(051=F)
f
�hy
x
Y a
7
Vacant Ind ustrial
Land Inventory
r & Market
Assessment
t �
September 1986
a -
NK
5
t,
i
sM
17
_ R �
s
�. - -
µ yk
F
t D wn Camdlm by dibft am
tt � POW
� 1 +#
- ego iea.Meir Dbgk*2 RkUd W
11tC r1c Zoq nix 3 Tm Mods
I9isoiex b it�e
►
DiMid7 Sbmm Katt
Di*kt 8 ido
MOW To"
D1 1i
x! Diwk*12 flay KWAM
RAM
t
aa�y
firm
^"
nt-
i� IR,
i
}x
i kv 3 'r-x
MSO Memorandum
2000 S.W.First Avenue
Forttand,OR 9MI-5398
SO V221-1646
Date: September 30, 1986
To: Interested Persons
From: Mel Huie, Local Government Analyst
Regarding: VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND INVENTORY
Attached is Metro's inventory of vacant industrial land within the
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) . The preliminary inventory results
released in September 1985 have been reviewed and updated by local
jurisdictions and Metro, and interested organizations and persons.
The inventory of large parcels (30 acres and larger) was updated in
December 1985.
Release of this data was delayed pending Metro Council action on
three petitions for amendment of the UGB. The inventory was part
of the hearings record in these cases.
In June of this year, the Council acted to approve in concept two
of these petitions. When final action is taken this fall, those
amendments will add two sites in the Sunset Corridor, unconstrained
to development except for a narrow strip of floodplain. These
sites are as follows:
Raiser/Shute Road 450 acres
(South of Sunset,
west of Cornelius Pass)
Riviera 88 acres
(North of Sunset,
east of Helvetia Road)
The Council has denied the third petition, from BenjFran
Development to add 470 acres south of the Tualatin Valley Highway
and west of 209th as recommended by the Hearings Officer.
If you have questions, please call me or Jill Hinckley, Land Use
Coordinator at Metro. Phone: (503) 221-1646. Technical
memoranda, which detail the methodologies for carrying out the
inventory and estimating demand, are available for review at our
office.
FV MH/JH/sm
5844C/460-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Summary yellow
2. Demand .for Industrial Land. . . blue
3-
3. Supply of Vacant Industrial Land. . . . . . . . . . . blue
4. Natural Building Constraints. . . . . . . blue
5. Inventory of Large Parcels
(30 Acres and Larger) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . green
6. Inventory of All Parcels
(Regardless of Siae) * . . brown
** Technical Memoranda (Available
for Review at Netro Office)
A. "How the Vacant Industrial Lands Inventory was Updated"
H. "Site Naps of Subdistricts and Jurisdictional Summary
Information Sheets used for the Inventory"
C. "Industrial Land Demand Estimate"
D. "Comparing Supply and Demand"
E. "Identification and Classification of Vacant Industrial Lands,
1985 and 1982'
F. "Inventory of Large Acre Parcels (30 Acres and Larger) with
Constraints to Development Listed"
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER
. METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT
September 30, 1986
SUMMARY
Total Supply (all parcel sizes) :
_ 19,070 acres of vacant industrial land exist within the OGB. Of
this total, 3,174 acres, or 17 percent, are in Clackamas County;
6,172 acres, or 32 percent, are in Washington County; and 9,724
acres, or 51 percent, are in Multnomah County.
Of the region's total vacant industrial lands, 12,348 acres, or
65 percent,. are within 1,000 feet of sewers, and 6,722 acres, or
5 percent, are farther than I,Uuu feet from sewers. 54 percent of
the total is on-rail and 46 percent is off-rail.
Supply of Large Acre Parcels (30 acres and larger) :
t
Of the region's 19,070 acres of vacant industrial lands, 10,011
acres, 52.5 percent, are in parcels of 30 acres and larger. This
land is located on 103 sites -- 21 sites are in Clackamas County, 39
sites are in Multnomah County, and 43 sites are in Washington County.
There are 24 sites with at least 100 acres of uncommitted vacant
industrial land n t e region. Multnoma-fi County has 14 of the
e tee; Washington County has nine; and Clackamas County has only one
site.
Of the 10,011 acres in parcels of 30 acres and larger: 1,509 acres
are committed to end users] 3,038 are uncommitted with no
constraints to development; and 5,464 acres are uncommitted but
constrained (no sewers within 1,000 feet of the site; hazards
including floodplain, steep slope and settlement ponds;• sites
partitioned into small lots with odd-shaped configurations, e.g. ,
long -and narrow lots; annexation, zone change or plan amendment
requirements; or property available for lease only, rather than for
sale) .
The Columbia- Corridor is the subregion with the largest supply.of
uncoma tted vacant industrial land in large parcels, with 3,156
acres, or 37 percent, of the region's total. 746 acres, or
24 percent, of the uncommitted lands in the Columbia Corridor are
currently sewered.
'. The hi-tech Sunset Corridor in Washington County contains 1,333
acres of uncomm tted vacant industrial land. This represents 16
percent of the region's total.
' Adequacy of the Supply of industrial Land:
Metro's adopted po ulation and Smto ent Forecast to the Year 2005
projects total employment for the our-county metropolitan area tor
"SMSA") to be almost 914,160. Thia represents almost 297,200 new
jobs over the next 20 years. Almost four-fifths of the region's
economic- growth, or approximately 241,5C0 new jobs, are expected to
locate within the Metro area's Urban Growth Boundary (UGS) .
R
An estimated 8,975 acres will be needed to accommodate this
projected employment growth within the UGB: 5,192 acres for
industrial and 3,783 for commercial. i
The total amount of vacant industrial land in the region is almost
four times the estimated long term need. However, not all land
designated for industrial use is necessarily suitable or existence
of available,., for development. A lack of sewers within 1,000 feet or
existence of natural constraints may represent major difficulties
for certain types of development. in addition, shortages may exist
or develop in certain specialized submarkets within the region.
4
t
3
}
•
l
s
DEMAND FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND
Long-Term Needs
Metro's adopted Population and Employment Forecast to the Year 2005
projects total employment for the four-county metropolitan area (or
"SMSA") to be almost 914,160. This represents almost 297,200 new
jobs over the next 20 years. Almost four-fifths of the region's
economic growth, or approximately 241,500 new jobs, are expected to
locate within the Metro area's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) .
An estimated 8,975 acres will be needed to accommodate this
Y ' rojected employment growth within the UGBt 5,192 acres for
industrial and 3,783 for commercial. This estimate is consistent
with 1982 estimates of 3,500 to 7,300 acres needed through the year
2000.
Metro estimates prepared as part of the 2005 Forecast identified
2,437 acres designated for commercial use. This is 1,346 fewer
acres than are projected to be needed by 2005. Some industrially
designated land is likely to be developed for commercial use to
accommodate this shortfall. Assiming the entire commercial 4
shortfall is accommodated on industrial lands, total industrial
vacant land needs would be 6,538 acres.
Short-Term Demand
s
The Oregon State Economic Development Department suggests that from
three to five times the amount of industrial land expected to be
needed for the next year should be available to meet short-term
needs. While this is a useful rule of thumb, it is often difficult
In practice to predict accurately annual land needs.
For example, according to a Norris, Beggs, Simpson summary, 1,290
acres were purchased for development from January 1, 19840 to
January 28, 1985. Another 800 acres were known to be in negotiation
or in escrow as of April 1985. If land sales were used as the basis
for short-term need estimates and were to continue at that rate,.
then 5,000 acres -- almost as much as the entire projected long-terms
need -- would need to be available for immediate development., Such
an estimate of short-term need is likely to be unrealistically high.
Another estimate of annual need can be derived based on actual land
consumption rates over the past few years. Because of the
recession, however, this approach may produce too low an estimate.
Building permit records indicate that from January 1982 through
March of 1985, only 540 acres were consumed for industrial use.
This translates to an average of 168 acres a year. At that rate, a
mere 840 acres (five times the annual average) would be sufficient
to meet short-term needs.
tit
A third, and- probably most reliable approach, is to use long-term
projections as the basis for estimating short-term needs. Five
times the projected average annual growth for the next five years
produces 1,700 acres as an estimate of short-term needs.
To be responsive to the recent land sales boom, however, and to
ensure that Portland maintains its competitive position, this figure
might be doubled to provide a generous estimate of short-term needs.
SUPPLY OF VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND
Re9ionwide Totals
Metro's survey. of local jurisdictions identified 19,070 acres of
vacant industrial -- some 2,630 acres more than were identified in
Metro's 1982 industrial Land Market Assessment.
Some of this increase is due to differing methodologies for the two
studies. However, some portion of this increase is likely to
reflect local jurisdictions' increased commitment to economic
development and the resulting redesignation of additional land for
Industrial use.
The total amount of vacant industrial land in the region is almost
four times the estimated long-term need. However, not all land
designated for industrial use is necessarily suitable, serviced or
available for that purpose. Accordingly, this study examined some
key variables that can affect the developability of industrial
land. However, none of the variables considered appear to pose any
significant constraint to the region's ability to accommodate
anticipated growth.
t
3 f
r m
Natural Building Constraints
Traditionally, the low, flat land in floodplains has been
designated, sometimes by default, for industrial use. The Statewide
Planning Goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development
Commission (LCCC) classify residentially zoned land in floodplain or
subjectto other natural hazards as "unbuildable." Because such
lands do require additional engineering and investment for
development, industrial lands subject to locally regulated natural
hazards are also
considered
IndustriallLandeMarketindeed,
Assessment�.ere
so classified in Metro's
However , such land should not necessarily be eliminated from
consideration. In the first place, buildings will generally cover
less than 50 percent of any given lot to be developed.
floodplain or other constrained land covers less than 50 percent of
a lot, it may, if suitably locrted, be' used to meet landscaping,
setback or parking requirements without significantly affecting
development costs. The fact that a part of a lot could not itself
built wttiextra
etheaffect
expense
of
developngtheenre lot ifose "unbuildable" portionseednot
be built upon.
Where building constraints affect more than 50 percent of the site,
however, or are inconveniently located, then filling, grading, or
other special engineering activity is likely to be required for
development to occur. In such cases, development will be more
costly. But rarely is the land technically or economically
"unbuildable."
With these considerations in mind, information was collected
wherever available on lots with more than 50 percent of the site
constrained by floodplain or other natural constraints, lots with 50
percent or. less constrained, and lots free of any natural building
constraints.
Since this information was not available for such of the land
supply# the results underestimate land in each category.
Nonetheless, this analysis identified 9,345 acres in parcels free of
any natural development constraints or hazards, and 1,632 acres more
In parcels with less than 50 percent of their area subject to
natural .development constraints. Complete hazard information is not
available for the Columbia Corridor.
•
Sewer Avaiiabilit- r
•, govern are the one *suet have" for most urban industrial development
in the region. Fortunately for long-term growth prospects,
virtually all land within the UGS is expected to have sewers
available by the year 2000.
Wven in 'the short-term, the unavailability of sewers within 11000
feet may be only a minor impediment for a large scale industrial
s 'developer. not for smaller firms or in cases where the distance to
the nearest sewer is so great as to make sewer extension too costly
for even a major industrial use, sewer availability may be a
critical element of site selection.
For this study, sewer availability generally means that a sewer line
lies within 1,000 feet of the nearest property line. However, for
more than one-third of the land included in the inventory
information was available only for whether sewers were actually
adjacent to the site. As a result, data on sewer availability
significantly underestimates the acreage with sewers within 1,000
feet.
Even these conservative figures show that sewer service is available
to sufficient land to meet not only short-term but long-term needs.
Metro's survey identified a total of 12,348 acres with sewers within
1,000 feet or less. Of these, 10,801 acres are free from any
natural development constraints or hazards, and an additional 1,215
acres have natural constraints covering less than 50 percent of the
parcel. Furthermore, the Portland Development Commission and City
of Portland have approved creating an urban renewal district in the
Columbia South Shore to construct roads, storm drains and
recreational areas. The district is bounded by H.B. 82nd and 185th
Avenues and Columbia Boulevard. Water and sewer service (if
desired) will be provided through Local Improvement Districts (LID)
and be paid by benefiting property owners.
In sumo, there is currently within the UGB enough sewered, relatively
unconstrained land to accommodate projected growth through 2005.
Parcel Size
Many industries require a large site area to accommodate their
current operation, allow for future expansion, or protect them from
Incompatible uses. Metro's survey identified 10,011 acres in 103
parcels of land containing 30 acres or more in one ownership.
Of this, 1,509 acres are already committed to particular
developments. This still leaves 8,502 acres of uncommitted land in
parcels 30 acres or larger -- more than enough to contain the entire
region's industrial growth for the next 20 years. 3,038 acres of
this land is known to have sewers within 1000 feet and have less
than 50 percent of its area subject to natural constraints. 5,464
acres have one of the following constraints to development: no sewer
and water lines within 1,000 feet of the site; hazards including
floodplain, steep slope, and settlement ponds; sites partitioned
Into call lots with odd-shaped configurations, e.g. , long and
narrow; annexation, zone change or comprehensive pian amendment
requirements; or property available for lease only, rather than for
sale.
Of the region's 3,038 vacant uncommitted industrial lands in large
parcels with no constraints and available for immediate development
45 percent of the land is located in Washington County, Multnomah
County has 41percent, and Clackamas County has nearly 14 percent of
the total.
of
tted
The Sunset Corridor possesses 11333Incadeition,c5671acreslofd
ther
16 percent of the regions tots
vacant lands are committed.
The definitions of terms used in conducting the update of the
are available informare the
inventory and more detailed
Technical Memoranda which a .
Proximity to Rail
„ For most industries, pro
ximit�sthaveitraditil is a onallyvbeen dee or neutral
signated
factor. Lands along rail lin
for industrial use: 95 percent of the Metro are
major industrial
growth centers are served by rail. Thus the absence
frail access
for those who require it was not considered as a potential
development constraint.
esses
However, for vibration-sensitive mroximity anufacturing
beroc
ansideredca a$ in
electronics indu
liability rathersthan' anpasset.
Some 884 acres were projected to be needed to accommodate new
employment, growth in the .electronics industry.
noweverr over 530
acres of vacant land have already been
200 mittelofor
develot may beent by
4.
electronics industries, so final year
somewhat higher.
in Washington County, there wiithinr1,000cres feet andand with nonotonaturaraill
3,076 of these with sewers
constraints covering less than 50 percent of the land area.
In Clackamas County* there are hin1i3000rfeetf andnwithnot
natural rail,
1,869 of these with sewers wit
constraints co acresof land not on
pnd ercent 1,
vering less than 273
Multnomah .Countyr there are
of these with sever within 1.000 feet and with nature
constraints
00
v covering lass than 50 -percent of the land alrea.
acres and larger. ,53 parcels were identified regionwide As located
-off rail lines.
M0/JR/sm
5646C/460-6
09/30/86
'Mw
f p -�•'.y, ? 'E
MEMO Memorandum
=0 S.W.Firs)Avenue
V,,&nd.OR 9MI-5398
91tV:21-Nr46
s
t
t
•
Date: Sep' giber 30, 1986
To: Interested Persons x
• ' 4
From: Mel Buie. Local Government Analyst
Regarding: VACANT INDUSTRIAL LANDS2
AND LARGER)IN
E ORY OF LARGE ACRE
PARCELS (30
During December 1985• Metro's Intergovernmentalocresource vacantCenter
Dur g
(IRC) updated its existing inventory
industrial parcels with iThehutedwase baseds of tuponeanoinventory
Growth Boundary (UGB) • departments of local
conducted during the spring and summer of planning
The information
in this report was collectedDevelopment frohCe�mission (PDC) , Port
'jurisdictions# Portland
of Portland* Oregon Economic De elopmentstate Department, economic '
planning consultants.
No primary research or site visits were conducted.
Meetings and
zations
telephone interviews with representativesstup-todate informationifor ithe
were cx3nducted to obtain the _ tions
inventory. Attachment "J" lists theThe informationagenerated from
sations contacted for information.
the inventory was also compared to recent inventories of vacant
industrial lands published in Ore on Business Ma astne (August
985) and The Business Journal Jufot raaja�5aman mentsp planning
r
1 t t overs
documents prepare Y Pe
0
Portlacid Metropolitan
urban Growth Boundary (see Attachment
references) .
•, ed as
covers parcels of 30 acres and larger and
Thclassifies te updathem as "omitted' to an end user atcelsnaree also ."
classifies. Constraints to developing uncommitted large p
identified.
The information is available by eight subregions: Sunset Corridor
with 13 sitet Sout
s, Kid-Valghin toneCo Nt �nville Mithith 12 sldl test East
81
N3,,n ton Count w t 18 s teal with
C ac eases County with ilnairemainoermofa magi Count20with efive
' rag am w t Sites, a
s tea.
i
Memorandum
Page '2
September 30, 1986
Vhe.'inventory shows that there are 103 sites with 30 acres or more
containing some 10,011 acres. The total acreage figure includes
1,509 committed acres; 3,038 uncommitted acres with no constraints=
and 3,464 uncommitted acres with at least one of the following
6onstraints's no, sewer lines within 1,000 feet of the site]
hasarda, including floodplain, steep slope, and settlement ponds= '
parcels with odd-shaped configurations, e.g. , long and narrow;
annexation, sono change or comprehensive plan amendment
requireowts; and property available for lease only, rather than
for 'sale.'
`
Of the reg ion's 3,038 vacant uncommitted industrial lands in large
parcels with. no constraints and available for immediate
development, 45 percent of the land Is located in Washington
County#Multnomah County has 41 percent, and Clackamas County has
nearly 14 percent of the total.
Columbia Corridor is the subregion with the lar est 'suhey
1 of
vacant industrial land with 3,237 acres or 32 percent of the
riagloWe total. only 81 acres are committed. But only 746 acres
or 24 percent of the uncommitted lands sre available for immediate
devei t. tome .76 percent of the uncommitted lands in the
Columb Corridor do not have sewer within 1,000 feet or are in the
floodplain.
', `- The' Portland Development Commission and City of Portland have
`
approved creating an urban renewal district in the Columbia South
$bore to provide road*, storm drains and recreational areas. The
district is bounded by U.N. 82nd and 185th Avenues and Columbia
Boulevard. Nater and Sewer lines (if desired) will be provided
tbroagbt000aj Improvement Districts (LID) and be paid by benefiting
�_ property o+rrners. -
fte P=set.4orridor possesses 1,333:'acres_of uncommitted lands or
pemwat of .the ceg ion*s total. In addition, 567 acres of the
_ s. s't ..lames arm oc�msitted. .
Ift-
d*finitions of terns used in conducting the update of the
{,
inventory are provided in Attachment L. `«
4 V46a-5 .
h
n-
(30 ACRES AND LARGER
A. BMEW CORRIDOR -- UPDATED DECOMM 1985
Uncommitted
Parcel committed No Ganstraints Constra nts
1. Sawthorn Farm/ 35 0 0
Metheusl
2. Dawson Creek 0 54 252
3. ITEC 210 0 0
4. Johnson2 0 35 12
S. Raiser/231st 0 77 22
6. a. Fujitsu3 140 0 0
b. PacTrust3.4 0 48 0
7. Tanasbourne 41 30 39
8. Five Oaks5 0 71 31
9. seaport 0 197 0
10. 81=kAftst Union6•7 0 107 0
40
11. Oregon Graduate 0 0 138
Center
12. Cornell Oaks 53 0 38
13. Windolph Park 75 0 85
13 22
TOM 567 694 639
•= 1 Remaining acres in small lots undevelopable for large user-
2 Van Duyn project on 12-acre parcel did not materialise.
3 information from Jos Layman,, pacTrust.
4 Parcel bordered by planned realignment of Cornell load an north. Old
Cornell load on south and Cornelius Pass load on east.
5 Ton acres of rnuoonstrained parcel in floodplain.
6 lour acres of 107-acre parcel in floodplain.
7 Divided into two parcels west and east of tracks.
=VON,/sm-58440-460-7-07/16/86
MARY VWAW Lm PAPASLS
(30 ACRES MM Ii1RGMR)
B. COUNry -- OPDAmW =3== 1985
Omitted
Wool C omitted no Constraints Constraints
1. Forest arwm/Tektronix 72 0 0
2. Surcher 0 0 64
3. 10th Avenue IP 0 30 0 .
!. 8obbs Road 0 0 36
3. Malmt Strset/Spaniol 0 0 32
6. walnut Street $./surge' 0 60 0
7. Oregon poses 0 0 49
S. ***my 0 0 60
9. seaver ton TSS 77 ® 0
fs
10. Beaverton Crook b 0 61
U. Floating point 56 0 0
12. St. Mary•• , 0 0 52
TQ+m 203 90 376
16 sates of 60-acro parcel are in floodplain. Portion of act*&
in floodplain are fillable.
3844C/460-6
07/16/86
Y
-73
_� a
,�`, .-
SUMMARY OF VACANT LAMM PARCELS
(30 ACRES AND LARIGMR)
C. SOUTH MSHlbl@1'Ob1 OOUNTf UPDATED DECEMBER 1985
Uncommitted
Parcel Committed No Constraints Constraints
1. Anderson 0 0 70
2. Frontier Leather 0 0 30
; 3. 08/NA Lumber 0 0 52
4. sentrol 0 40 0
S. Marshall/Sherwood 0 36 0
6. Bossman 0 0 32
7. Roch/Nager 0 72 62
S. Bogota 0 0 40
9. sharp . 0 0 30
10. Drake 0 31 0
11. Moore Clear Co. 0 58 0
12. Ragg/Meisee 0 40 0
s
13. Quatryl 0 0 79
14. Leveton- 0 240 0
15. Malgreave 0 0 65
16. swampor/Un 36 0 0
17. Sidell/lualatin 0 81 0
E
18. std. Mire G Iran/
Itel/Pardus20 0 17 .
46
TO'D1L 36 598 523
Pour property owners, but land assemblage tot a sale to single user
should not be a problem.
!free property awnexsr but land assemblage toe a sale to single user
should not be a problem.
10 -5844C/460-1-07/16/86
f
OF t7liCAW IARW PAF=S
-(30-ACRU MW LXROW
=.�w alA. i1VZLiUPDAM amcalam 1.9$5
' gtuaoaslitted
No Costraints Goastr ate
g�3L ot
I, i►arka y/Wrm Neaten► 0 59 0
Z. 8111g oon 0 0 33
' f
3. KirammAp 0 42 0 •♦
4. Tektra►ix 63 0 0
S. Tektranix 100 0 0
E,
G. Ridder/UO Rational
Bark.ftu" 0 0 43
7. hike 101 0 0
8w eomksan 0 0 40
9. tseamm 0 33 0
10. spa 0 0 S9
.., TOZl1b .354 134 175
',K�44CJ450-11
Ti
rE
4,3
- w
- -
e
r i
' r
� Y -5.-, �.� �N .�,'-• .z , .„�w,, �.;,#n �^ r'�` � �.M" Ka .� 'w � ?3 3,ax,-cu ,ate
SUNG= OF VACANT LM= PARCBLS
(30 ACRZS AND ISR)
R. RAST CLACKNKM OWWM — UPDATSD DBCZMM 1985
Uncomitted
Parcel Cosaitted No Constraints Constraints
1. O 37 0 0
2. Southern Pacific/
Raraony Flood 0 0 87
3. Precision Castparts 0 0 52
4. Case Withycembel 86 0 0
S. Southern Pacific/
B.B. 122nd Avenue 0 148 0
6. PM/S.E. 130th AVenue2 0 33 0
7. Seventh Day Adventist3 0 35 0
S. Red Soils4 0 65 0
9. Ores" 0 0 34
10. Rivercrest 0 0 39
11. worth Clackaaas
School District 912
0 0 58 .
TOol'16L 123 281 270
If government offices are relocated, an additional it acres would be
available to fora a 76•-acre parcel.
1 If Oregon National Guard Camp is relocated, an additional 64 acres
• would be available to fora a 150-acre parcel-
2 Soeae acres will be used for future site of a substation.
3 if church *me moves, an additional 50 acres would be available to
fom an 85-acre parcel.
WOR
5044C/460-10
_'Q7/l6/86
x 7_
u F-,
SUMMARY or VACANT YAMS PALS
(30 ACRES ASD LNIMR)
F. COZOMIA COBRXDOIR 1985
pncomitted
Pel Corritted no Constraints Contra nts
1. S /mant 8ayden Island 0 0 33
2. Sayden Island, Inc. 0 0 37
3. PSE/Wast sayden Island 0 0 496 !
4. Best Transportation, Inc. 0 0 182"
5. East semen Island 30 0 0
6. Riwrrgats 0 360 361
7. Gilmore Steel 0 0
S. Berta Road 0 125 35
9. 8oadeoor 0 0 65 _-
10* nirpoct business Center 51 0 0
11. PIkAlcutheaat Quadrant 0 0 400
t 12. PIA/8authwat Quadrant 0 0 236
13, Miding,/Sivrera 0 90 0
#� Columbia 205 0 40 0
15. Bernard Coaeroe Center 0 65 0
Ym 16. ._. lath aid !!Here 0 0 s0
17 mp].ae�d/1sStb N=, 0 0 2003A. goods j
0 0 05 o
39. sroabd�rlr �ltrport 0 0- 65
0 30 0
2.U6
. 6
al
eJ i
£ 4 d
� .�.� '• �F''��i��F."��x..s�.n'•+ �-'�r�z�".-„_ �v,�,�:.'-e'��a.t:'." .s.,,Hx.?' ..c.zry -.-=�.�.,�°a�,�.',aJ�. w-r.,.-j� �3 ` c-, - � ''.`'��'+�°�`�'�»-tib"' �
RCEW
SOP VACANT PA
AY �
(30 AiCIS6 AND L �
.._
UMDBCB� 1985
PD
pncomnittea
P.. Dosmnitted
Cal
No Constraints Ccnstra nts
0
30 A
1. Cessgbino Bast 55
0 55
2. Santiela Corp. Park 0
0 34
3. Hoeing 85
0 0
!. $iawArnan
36 0
5. Caaaaft CDrP•
0
0
0 44
6. Skstrcaa 31
0
7. ariesh Sanaa Gravel
0
s
C
0 36
•. sera 0
O 43
9. -Shaun 95
,..
0 0
10. Columbia Brick Works
0 0
auiitsu �Ao
12. Clear Crack 0 45 O
Business Park
0 .0 297
13. Nwill' 265
Len Pwitic 0 0
14. VVIWA/un
RCL
23 908
200
Was
•_ 58440/460-14
07/16/66
_ 7'i`x
SUMMARY OF VACANT-LhMG6 PALS
(30 ACRES AND LNR=)
B. RWAMM QF' WLTWMR COUNTY -- upDA'i9;D USCMU 1985
uncommitted
Pi Committed No Constraints Constraints
<1. multnaoab CUntx Fara 0 0 70 .
83 '
2. Publishers 0 103 0
3. Mwks Landing 0 114 0
6. VW Site/St. Jobns 0 35 12
S. sidsll/WortLnd 35 0 0
TOIRL 35 232 165
mvm
S&44C/"0-12
07/15/"
a..
1
h
s ,
s x t ,1'jy 1
Attachment "I"
SI8 aw or VACAW UUM PASA
(30 ACRXB Ami LRRSR)
BY Caum MW =GUN TOTAL
QPDATZD DECUBM 1985
omitted
!
! o!
of ! o
Vii_� Total po Constraints Total. Ctic�stra►int� Total
a County 134 175
*110 swills•. 264 270
ast C� County. 123 291
Total 367 25.b5! 415 13.b5! 445 8.14
+�fio�b,_ Come�t 746 2,410
Columbia C rridor 28010 243 908
Gx 252
14mirAsr of CountY .
Total 316 20.94! 1 4 40.85! 3, 3 63.75!
UashJ n 567 694 639
Suw wt rr ar 90 374
Kid- i Lngton CMMtY 203 5
South washl"ton County 36
Total
806 ,�3.41� 1 @� ,43,�,43t 1 28x"
3IOR T0�!'1►L 1,509 100.00! 3,038 100.000 5,464 100.000
' 34<44Cf460-t;�
fi711�6
' I lalccss►tiaa oer pasrosl laaaticim and oonstraints ba dsvelop�sat ii anY, ara in the
•**r orwaAa ries availabla for reviser at the Ustto otfio4.
;
t.
� IIg'' ��t� �. :ice= •� h` .�+� s.:ct_„s K:
ATTACHMENT "J■
LIST OF JURISDICTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED
Public Sector
1. Beaverton Planning Department
3. Cornelius City Man-ger's Office and Public Works Department
3.. Forest Grove Planning Department
4 Gresham Planning Department
5 Hillsboro Planning Department
6 , Lake Oswego Planning Department
7 Mllwaukie Planning Department
8. Portland_Planning Bureau
9. Portland Development Commission
10. Sherwood City Manager's Office
11 Troutdale Planning Department
120 Tualatin Planning Department
13. Nest Linn Planning Department
.14. Wilsonville Planning Department
15. Clackamas County Transportation and Development Department
18. Washington County Land Use and Transportation Department
17. Port of Portland
18. State of Oregon Economic Development Department
Private Sector
1. Balls Janik a Novak Attorneys
2. Hobson a Associates
3. Norris# Beggs a Simpson
4. Coldwell Banker
5. The Quadrant Corporation
6. Gordon Davis Planning Consultant
7. Aaren Myers i Associates
S. 1044 Friends of Oregon
9. western international Properties
�. . PACTt ttst
U. C8214 t,HILL
12# R0 Vortbwest Consultants
SVW46o-14
'09/38/86
,
77
i
3
N
4 ,
e _
�x
:- '-R 3 ,z;:r`�, "- .._ .ems., ,k -•., ..a: s. .,y w
ATTACHMENT "H"
REFERENCES OF PLANNING DOCUMENTS
1. "Petition for Amendment to the Portland Metropolitan Urban
Growth Boundary,* October 1485, Raiser Development Company and
Co-Petitioners.
Z• "Petition to Amend Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary
. for -the Roseway Business Center," October 1985, BenJFran
Development.
.,`•. 3. *Petition for Amendment of Metropolitan Service District Urban
Growth Boundary," October 1985: Riviera Motors, Inc.
Noon
5876C/460-15
09/18/86'
rg
3
d,
Wig"
ATTACHMENT "L"
f GLOSSARY
3. Committed Land purchased or optioned by an ends-user vs. a
de"fi open, holding company or speculator.
2. Uncommitted - Land available for sale or lease to an end-user.
3. Parcel - Land in one ownership, regardless of parcelization.
. 4. Hazards - Parcels with 25 percent or more of its land area
w th a the 100-year floodplain; or parcels with steep elope
greater than 20 percent) or industrial settlement ponds as
defined by local jurisdictions.
5, Industrial Park IP - Not all parcels designated as IP -are
c:ompleEely subdivided or developed; and may still be in the
proposal stages. Each site needs to be individually chucked.
NR/=
$976C,/`45.0-16
09/18/86
�i
9-
t
T
� r
w
3M
SUMMARY OF VACANT INDUSTRIAL LANDS
WITHIN METRC! REGION IIGB
(ALL pARCELS - REGARDLESS OF SIZE)
Note; Data Limitations for Beaverton and the Columbia Corridor
requires separate treatment
Subdistrict On-Rail Off-Rail Total
SLWSRS WITHIN 1,000'
-
' Parcels with All Data Avaiiabiel
No Hazards 2,956.37 4♦351.74 71308.11
• Lasa than 503 Hazards 805.45 409.56 1.215.01
. .
50 or More Hazards 269.06 63.12 332.18
Y Subtotal ,03 .8$ 4-,-824.42 0,855.3624
Columbia Corridor
:nom (Hazard information not
available
Total, Acres y
Within 1,000' of Sewers 2,625.90 457.10 3,083.00
Beaverton (Only(Only Total
Afros Availablo) N/A N/A 410.00
Kong THU 1,0001 FROM SEMRS
= _ parcels with All Data Available3
!to Hazards 819.72 807.02 1,626.74
Less than 503 Hazards 55.01 362.78 417.79
s
504 or bore Hazards 1.45 1,�� 3.11
Subtotal
Columbia Corridor,
(Hazard information not available)
Total Acres
More than 1,000' from Sewers 2,526.50 2,147.90 4r674.40
464 81600.86
4 19,070 34
TONAL. MHT,RO REGION, (within UGS) 10.059. z ,..,,
5044Cl460-27
# 10/09/06
S .
Haters;° 1 The available Columbia Corridor data did not have
information on hazards, but did have data on rail and
Sewer access. Thereforer the Columbia Corridor could not ;
t ba• lunped with the other parcels and the best data
� r
break&O'n possible I asshown. bats; was root available`
x F
i,a .Beaverton on .hasards. or raii .ucaess but was for 'aewer
{ °, eceeas`. Therefore,`; the' best`data available: is` as'.ahovstr
-
d (footnotes continum ! oin next page),:
X
J xi� SAi,i'• y9r�
v
s
r,
Baasard totals omit Beaverton and the Columbia Corridor
- acreage.-
3 All of Beaverton's industrial land is within 110002 of
sewers. Therefore the lack o€ data as3 explained in
footnote I does not ;affect this portion of the table.
Subtotal for won-rail" and "off-rail"- do not include
Beaverton as explained xn footnote 1. Therefore, these
subtotals do not sun 'to the grana total,
s�
4,4
f
iS#y
sE a � a Ufa E
L7 - ,i,•n ''' x !
-
�`'s
-
'�s`-
- � ,.,.., � �..: . ". � ..a-�'�.' „�:"� x.u- ,::.•r"�� •: e.�.�.a.'�--fix; -
SUMMARY Op VACANT INDUSTRIAL LANDS
(ALL PARCELS -- RBGARDLBSS 'OF SIS$)
On Rail Off Rail Thai
CLAG1hm" COUNTY s f
461,acres
I�fthin 1#000of Sewers with:
aarals 757.93 1 r 787.47 2,545.40
Loss tin 50% Hazards 96.38 81.35 177.73
504 or *ore Hazards 1 *05
,_,1 1,._...7,6 96 18$:72
x sbtaal 3.016.07 11896.78 2041
Total Acres
ROrtd� Cham 1,000' from Sewers with:
. . - Bazar is 31.76 200.96 232;.72
is tha�A 804 awards 10.96 13.97 24A.93
" • v.. '. Of o�c •. rte Razards 1.45 1.66 3, 11
216.59 255.76
11.17
so
CLAC�'.rilMASCOUNTY 105024 2 113.37 ane 19 3.682
X83. 1Crses
x #.hin 1#1000* of Sewers_ with, Y
, ► asaara:; :arils 0.00 0.00 ;00
, 0 .8a$aras 0.00
47.2947
.29 r
=r►r0':amara: 0.00 - .00 0. 0
: x = t1�Dtotalq' a
s .ahs 1 tl from 84mare with: ;
�
r ## a#tR ~
0.00 x.00 # «pt1
lia . '.moi ears 0.80!< S.Oti s 0 00
F�
-40 i s
}
0.00
z
"VI$- w '
VV
,x t1'F w xa w•a k' S�s s :x k"' `F 3t w ,
ING
Si71�!A tY Of VACANT INDUSTRIAL LANDS
(g#LT, PARC.HLS REGARDLESS OF SIZE)
F
R�►ladistr i at
On Rail
Off Rail Total
Lake Oswego.
"to% "Acres
k '. Rhin 1,000• Of Sewers with;
�.
No Hazards 11.70 0,.00 11.70
Al
Dass than 501 Hazards
6.16 0.00 6.16
0.00 0 0.00 oZQe Hasarc�s ...,_.._
Subtotal` 17.86 0.00 17.86:
s' to
I Acres
ire than 1,00011 from Sewers with: 0.00 0.00_ 0.00
Mazards
Y -
Less than 501 Hazards 0.QQ 0.oa 0.00
301 or Moms Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
. . . 8ubtatal
�� .00
17 17
_? TOW Acres
within 1.000' of Sewers with:
-s 0.00 142.75 142-.75 -
aaearda 0.00 0.00
s , Less ttw►n S4! Aasaarda
6.603.70 40 30
S01rrkire Hazards "�a. .
� - �` EiatltbtE7it'�tl` •
-
Ca -ttAn 1 0001 from Sewers witha
BB 0.00 180.77 10. 9r
:jos $asa�cas o.00 13«97
,b �� � raaar8s 0.00
y
0- 0
66 ...40 34..4285 Af z
op 4 %4 yifi F«, y
r ., °A•^� c .T .,�a, t fi r a cr t � .� *" ^,.3 x„�.. ..`�'r+`a'�t*.. x b� y '" .`S.
,, a`"` ,+" r i "` z "`yam. { v'a' j''`•" -sir ,
Xt
Ski?�j
SUMMARY O!' VACANT'''INDUSTRIAL LANDS
(ALL hARCSY+S
F-. 1tBGARDLBSS flP SIZE)
district
On Rail Off Rail Total
Clackawas
$Otal Acres
• vitbic 1,800' of Sewers with:
y U. o Hhsarrls 440.54 309.16 ?49.70
Less 'thao` 500 Hazards 0.00 3m:0b 34.06
5 5 T4s or e .Hazards 2.50 a� 26.75
., ., 443.04
367.48 810
subtotal
Total Acres
'1?8art than 11000' from Sewers with: 0.00
0,00 0.00
No Hazaards
r :4 Lass than 500 Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 o.Qa
50% or Stora Hazards -$ou
5-83
subtotal •
443.04 367.48 810.52
93�,hv�Y„224 t
Total Acres
�ii�thin' 1*0009 of sawars withY
bio Aasar�ls
13.85 37.10 50.95
_Lass ;tbam $00 Hazards
86.T4 0.00 86.74
` 50 orft + Assarda 112.66 11:00 112.66
0ubtotil2 .
10
� Tote2 Acres
tiC►��! •than 1,000' from Bowlers- with:
f x . teatosare�s 0.00. o oo ' 0.00
acs U% sasards
0.0o
0*00
5►da or .ore samaras 0.00 0"00 2:00
= Sobtal.' '�=
+t
N.A
213 37.10
� i 'J
_
y 5 �y-
` �?
71
r�,__
$UMARY Op VACANT INDUSTRM L&NDS
{ALL $ARCBLS ---.REGhRA&JSS OF $ISE)
{ On Rail Off Rail Total
.: obdistriat _
,== Milwauki.es
'il'atal Acres
Niton 1,0009 of, Sewers with: 63«06 18,35 81.21
No Hazards
Less_ than 500 Hazards 0.00 4.00 0.00
. S48 or More Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
Subtotal 63.06 18.15 81.E
Total Acres
Mr►re than 11000' from Sewers with: 0.00 ' 0«00 0.00
:>: • Hazards ''
Loss than 500- Hazards 0.00 0:00 0.00
• 508 or More Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
g Subtotal 0-05
?it-
,. 0?AL 63.06 18.15 $121
� ik amas bluffa
-Total Acres
Within 1#0004 of Sewers with:
Y� 0.00 420.00 430.00
.. *o Saxards 0.00
t Less than-301 Hazards
0.00. 0.00
"t oar' ozR Rasards 0.00- 0.00 0. 0
= 170 T� ':03 U
Oubtot*l-
Votal Acres
3 ifore tb* n s000° froa4 Hewers w�iths 0.00 0«00 0.Q0
NO yjta�tar�la
{ #° Asa t ► 3;01 Hazards 0.00 0.00 O.QQ
50• of Mare Saearda 0 0 0�=
t 8.ubtcliirl •
ffu
0.00 420F d 4 �►
° 4 460=31
0~$- �
P4 f
i
t
raj' „`� r i
t dc i
r
T
'SO RYVAC INDDST L,; I D s
i'ARCl6 & RECAWLESS OF, SIZE)
ti
0itrizt Rail.
On Rail Off TotaL a
9 a
ti — —ll�iF$C
,A
, ' 3, f Sewers with:
W ' li a ud�t 7.87 69.3 77.22
tboW 1 Sas 1s 0.00 0.40 0.00
a , FT
r 0asarda 0.00 0.40 0.0
0
g
T tbtQrtal ''
3 : w SU7.0 69*35 7 .
o
Acc�a
?! h 1400 0 from Severs friths
08sards 2+5.39
; . $ 1 .aimI►�a1Ct3 ��. l: 0.00 10.96
3 `
. a
oc More 'easarS� 1.45 0.00 1.45
s
oto '3� ', 14
� 6�67 70.551 117.32
f -�---
A
fl $evore its $d
� .: v. 220.91 790.E 1011. 7
40 3.00
h res µ _
frow Vewors WL-t" -
00 5.37 . 24»26
a #
oas ,a.0�# ~`� �►:
� hsar�ls o as o24
x K
t 00
p
,�
i5 , ' 3i' { �°, '3F+$� kms• .w; .•i- tl �'' 9 k' fx �� �� - .�
� •,$,.+?y l Y'P�S� +- Edi Sj uY x� •-
WFME
it
u
f��'- ,+
�'�=�" "t. f'"`r
Vw
• kA.K.d� 3�_ 5�1t
`4 yTE.
Diu
1 li
F
i
s-
summa"':of VACANT=::INWSTIJAL::LANDS
( PA== MIMS..Off°'`SIZE)
ri
on Railff Mail: . o# =�
01ibltk-1-##090' of Sere with i
ar is (ss t.) 642.42 790,6# 1 43 ,0+6
f -
ONnr ** 0 tl a #� 509 :8s�carda X1.0..0 26.0 1 27.99.
* V", ! 41 Hazards 0.00 15.70
ILvaa�ia
-corridor
idor
� formati+ao not 'available)
•. thi =1 000 0] of Bowers 2#625.90 4157.14 3#083.00
y
lam+!! "1.#000' from Sevres with:
�� � ► as+� ..iss4t.f 492.96 96
�� �, s , ► ` 808 Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
M � i
.orMore Hazards 0:04 0.00 440 +
;.
bar f y- '' 14-:.iR�,i
littomation not available)COW
Y "
S L {
440rca Ori 1.000 of .Sewers 2#526.14, 2,147
� s
agum
'• ,y 4 : _ � ti�# _ _ _ qtr``:"'�`
lip,DSIIa 'carr
'.;. �... .ngti5w�,d �' ,fu z£ 2 •�''`1 ��x� .i,;, -...e..'�-a�k � >�r .�arci l �r�i-f��'S °��R.'k�,,��i.-t .
't '";s q -}a,�£r-.mak.• ,.,� � .�r 1 -Ni--ifie
� .-� -..;.s e�.��i �,dk� ��iT•x �SdzT�Ct'd"r .ya .c .t�t�e-.:7,�a"y`" '�''�t.'�'�, �f 3�346""�.,�r��s �.r} e �,�+g
��.�'Yi•�'�"-',r`°'' ��r�r7 �>r �.,._nr.� s���s� -fir
a
f--
e .
SQl�9siRF Off' 9RCrANT INDOSTRIAL LhNDS
(ALL PARCELS -- RBGM=LWS Of Sasa) a
t�bdistriot On Rail Off Rail Yotal
'fOt�,l
Acres
within 1.000. of Sewers with*
R
No Hasazds 209.62 595.84 SOS.46
h' Lose than S0 aasards 1.00 26.00 27.00 f
: 800 or Nora Harsards 0.00 0,00 0,00
_032
Subtotal 21
TUM
Total Aares
than 1,000' from Bowers with:
w n 6 Hazards 492.96 0.00 492.96
Loss than 5Q• Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
z;
..
0.00 0.00
$09 or More sasards 0,00
Subtotal 492.96 f.i�$ •
703.58 621.84 2 325.42
die 1 ISA
n Rail ® f Rail x2tol.
XMIndoc of Kul na*ah Count *
bo nQ Portland outst Columbia Corridor)
Total Aeras
WItbin 1 000• of Bowers with*
max : ' • we 8asards 432.80 194.80 627.60
s than "SO% Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.0
os Iio►go Hazards
41i total` 432.80Wo s
y
tbtn- 1:000• from Severs with: 0.00 0.00 0.00 .
..8asards
'than-,508 8asards 0.00 0.00 A.00
y drib :S tO Hazards .0 0600
.: .
�- St�►tata
2►
2 208.$0
yAs..
a
n,�}`
`'
r
7 c
Raiisi! ilil
�. gj�L4 RA$t;*W, RRGARAIM-sp. OF AIM
ieric On Rail Off Rail Total
ri
viae iu tow County:
{ ltl 000of :Sewer a with:
k Oea ��pracarda 1,556.02 11x73..63 . 3p329.45
Raa�►rali 70$.07 302.33 1#010.28
Tvv 50% r 1 $.76107. 0 21.46
00to
t2#371.39 . ,"� 8.69
2,07
30,
ton ;t0f2 y 'f+a►kal
► s= irailable) #10.00
� 1 ares
R111-Ix�4 x,000' from sew*ra withs
295.00 606.46 901.Qt,
'*�y 8 than 50 44.05 348.$1 392.88
1".�k" . fl. 0 �
339 US :6 172 GV
�al+�I JrI�313•��
MUM., _.
u ,
3'•t
4
•'� v;cam aa°'n..$�"� >y P $. g$ "k'
? c c,.s ''* .._ '� t a ':'a a;
z jty Y sr p"""s '- §r'f
4.
- �'��� r. n f� atm. '-,�� � -�'.`. ,. k �� �,�.b �1 s rfifi c. - �,,y'.'�'��',� �•
Lass tom.get s) 1
f i L
i Rail
On
l�
Rail
x r` h. Cg
it
k268.62 101.60
29.28 5.57 r 38.35
'
00 '0100
� 297*90 IT
TWO i
1tAa4'. t
�¢ 45.20iZ.46 107..5.6
�,
:tom 00# Ram"+��
0.00
s.Qa a.aa
# Hser4� 0.00 a.as 0.00
62.
16*73
39...>1.1. .0 J73.63 5 t
� b
M r
$52..55 baa. a. x 253.75
72.33
22.00
wad
F tiE,
:..3 M.
43.39-
w
W !
tet, .
i y1`�f
-�< � .g � '�� �X^,sa 'R.�-.�-,�+� 42: #A€�� ��a•-h s f, '� '�' y�j -
f II
r
y4
n
s x-
'INIlUSARI :. .I+aAl�,NsDp&
ARGAROLM
C
iatri�t On Rail Off Rail w r Katal.
+ epi �►Cr1@!e _ _ -
#3.t# ia .pifp of sewers w3 tb:
95.67 83.5p .369.27'. .�
0% Hazard96.23 .
70 ri Hazards 29.99 A. D 2i1.9 r�
: t+ t .
i8'► $±
�' �sR�e►l,t�exr�s
two .tom 1,#000 froae Seegers aitbs 70.47 2 +.24 95.73
Zots-' t#�on_ 4% uasards 29.39 0.0 29.x+9
r ' Orsr� � i�td�1`
p b.CO
3i�S 131.88 4,4 .
R '1, 00" of saw* �ritb: 17.53
. a 17.53 . 3
R .. . _
" x 0
r . VA
o'
bti+'
*' � aFYI
4Itrea $ .
��=-` � �� ►R- �. ���?�'' f�r+r�a �+ur►�rs- �►i the ,� . - 5,
Al
T 0.00
.5
4iltirs3 n 3i
- .+ ,
"� �-° '�., .�.�#�5tZ'a� `� A�+ r6a*asa,°%'s � �. �e s .h'tt {'y„ �4�.�•uY y ?.,4[.'�f R
Jig
SUMMARY OF VACANT 'INDUS'TRIAL LANDS
� (ALL PARCELS -- REGARDLESSt OF SIZE)
Subdistrict On Rail OffRail Total—
Cedar Hills:
Total 'Acres
Within 1000' of Sewers with:
' •. No,Hazards 5.29 10.77 15:06
• Less than 504 Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
«, .a40
508 or More Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
Subtotal S. 9 10.77 16.T6
Total Acres :.
Not* than 1,0001 from Se-ers with:
y No Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
*. Lose than' 506 Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
• 504 or Move Hazards 0.00 0.00
Subtotal 9.$$ " 00 00
' 529 107,7 1606
Total -Acres
Within 1:000' of Sewers withs
* no Hasakde 76.13 35.64 101.76
• Le ,thane 50% Hazards 5.31 12.86 18.15
gs:
5000 0.00
Sa btotaal Regards 0� 8.48 I M.
* than. x#000' from Sewers with:
Np.Nowwde 4.00 6.89 4.89
• __ o aa�erds . 0.00. 0.40 �-_ 0.00
• o 91cre
Hazards 0.00 0.00 . 0.00
8�xbto al - T..". `
81.43 43.31
AUt
W
_ 0 ' i6.
: t
, " - .
a�
s
37
art;.
v,
SUMMARY OF 'VACANT INDUSTRIAL LANDS
(ALLPARCELS -- REGARDLESS QIP SIZE)
�►tidst
On Rail Off Rail
rict Total
Tigard:
;dotal Acres
Mithin ,1,0001 of Sewers with:
45.60 24.20 69.80
• - No Hazards 16.20 39.53 55.73
Less than 50% hazards
504 or more Hazards 55.76 21 77.22 ,,,
Subtotal
11" 85. 9 20 `7
Total Acres
More than 1,000' from Sewers with: 0.00 O.OQ 0.00
so Hazards 0.00 0.00 0.00
} Less -than 505
Hazards00
•
Sotor Mare Hazards 0.00 0.00 Q$:.
Subtotal
0 0� '0 -
Ta'fAL 112.75
7.56 85 20
:jualatint
Total Acres
-Within 1,000' of Sewers 286.09 824.15 1'.'110.25
Subtotal,
(net of hazards)
'fatal Aareit
lio a than 1,000' from Setters 61.$1 74.00 135.81
Subtotal
(net hazards)
347.9E6.04
s - e
n .1,000• of '8*wors
tof
{ {natiaiSRrd�
410'00
G
°E r
SF" `k' #'`4.di,K `e
- - t
OATH OF OFFICE
State of Oregon )
ss
City of Tigard )
I, Laurie A. Wulf do solemnly swear that I will
uphold and support the Constitution of the United States of America and the
State of Oregon and the Charter and ordinances of the City of Tigard.
I will faithfully, honestly, and impartially perform the duties of Police
Officer to the very best of my knowledge and ability so help me God.
lw:41b1A
f. 23
a+ c r
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 24, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 14_1986
s- ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Amendment To� PREVIOUS ACTION:
TMC 11.04 Solid Waste Management
PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan
DEPT HEAD OK TTY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Should the Council revise Chapter 11.04 of the TMC to update the chapter?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Utility and Franchise Committee has proposed several revisions to Chapter
11.04 of the TMC to recognize changes in ownership and direction of the
franchises, new procedures and dates for rate analysis and adjustment.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. flake no action.
2. Revise TMC Chapter 11.04 by incorporating the changes suggested by the
Committee.
/ 3. Modify the suggested changes and direct the staff to bring back modified
4 amendments to TMC Chapter 11.04.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUMSTEO ACTION
The staff and Committee recommend that the Council revise TMC Chapter 11.04 by
Incorporating the charges suggested within the staff memo attached,
lbr191
F
� t t
MEMORANDUM
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i
E
TO: Members of the City Council November 14, 1986 {
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, t!=�f�
Community Development
SUBJECT: Amendments to TMC 11.04 Solid Waste Management
The Utility and Franchise Committee, working with former Community Assistant
Brian Hartung, identified the following amendments necessary to bring Chapter
11.04 of the TMC up to date.
11.04.040 (b) (1) page 153-3
Change "Frank's Disposal Service, etc." to
"Pride Disposal Company, Larry Leichner, President,
P.O. Box 839, Sherwood, OR 97140;"
11.04.040 (b) (2) page 153-3
Change "Miller Sanitary Service, etc." to
"Miller Sanitary Service, Inc. , Thomas Miller, President,
5150 SW Alder Ave. , Beaverton, OR 97005;"
11.04.090 (c) page 153-8
On the tenth line, beginning with the work "direct", delete the
remainder of section c. In its place, insert "Annual Report filed
by franchisees."
11.04.090 (6) (1) page 153-9
On line 1, beginning with the work "September", delete the
remainder of the section. In its place, insert "March lit, the €
franchisee shall file an annual report (Exhibit "C") with the City
Recorder for the year ending the previous December 319t."
11.04.090 (e) (2) page 153-9
On line 2, delete "October 1st" and in its place insert "April
1st".
11.04.090 (e) (4) page 153-9
On line 3, delete "November 30th" and in its place, insert "May
31st";
On line 4, delete "January 1st" and in its place, insert "June
1st".
`i'
Y
Page 2
At a later date, the Committee suggests that section 11.04.180 page 153-14
will be revised to reduce violations from misdemeanors to civil infractions.
{
The proposed amendments deal with:
1. Proper names and addresses of the franchisees.
2. Designation of the proper submittals to be considered when the City
considers rate adjustments.
3. The dates which will govern rate analysis.
A representative of the Committee will be present at the Council meeting to
discuss the proposed changes.
t /br191
w,
A.
.,Uma S"±A' a�{"1.6_ ,.'C,w,-, "1. - a<l�.*.' � __ _ �'^�j.'r .Ax ...7Yy.: ,.� �^`•
Title 11 , 1 l ���� JP&
HEALTH AND SAFETY C jam' (o H vt c , f iEYly
Chapters:
11.04 Solid Waste Management
Chapter 11.04
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Sections:
11.04.010 Title for citation.
11.04.020 Purpose, policy and scope of chapter pro-
visions.
11.04.030 Definitions.
11.04.040 Franchise--Granted to certain persons--
Scope of regulations.
11.04.050 Franchise--Tern--Automatic renewal when.
11.04.060 Franchise--Fees.
c 11.04.070 Responsibility of franchise.
11-.04.080 Frsinchise--Transfer, suspension, modifica-
tion or revocation--Conditions.
4 11.04.090 Rates for service.
11.04.100 Container requirements and collection limita-
tions.
11.04.110 Offensive wastes prohibited.
11.04.120 Unauthorised deposits prohibited.
11.04.130 Interruption of franchisee's service.
-11.04.140 Termination of service by franchise.
11.04.150 Subcontracts.
11.04 .160 Rules and regulations.
11.04.170 Enforcement officers.
11.04.180 Violation deemed misdemeanor when--Penalty.
11.04.010 Title for citation. The ordinance codified
in a Ater ifiall Seknown as the "city of Tigard solid
waste management ordinance," and may be so cited and pleaded,
and shall be cited herein as "this chapter." (Ord. 78-64
51, 1978) .
11.04.020 Pur se, 221igX and sco of cha ter ro-
visions. a It is declared to be in the public interest
or thi city of Tigard to establish this policy relative
to the matters of solid waste management to:
153 (Tigard 1/15/79)
11.04.030
r•
Provide sufficient waste volume to sustain
solid waste management facilities necessary to achieve
resource recovery goals established bythe
andcity,
Metropolitan
State Department of Environmental Quality
Service District;
( 2) Provide the basis for agreements with other
governmental units and persons for regional flow control to
such facilities;
( 3) Insure safe accumulation, storago£ solidcwaste;
transportation, disposal or resource recovery
( 4) Insure maintenance of a financially stable,
reliable solid waste collection and disposal service;
( 5) Insure rates that are just,
faito r,
reasonaable
and adequate to provide necessary
6) Prohibit rate preference and other discriminatory
•� practices which benefit one user at expense of other users
' of the service or the general public;
( 7) Conserve energy and material resources;
8) Eliminate overlapping service to reduce truck
traffic, street wear, air pollution and noise;
( 9) Provide standards for solid waste service and
public responsibilities; and
• (10) Provi$adt��uq�solid wasteand ecol.lectorsy fea-
sible recycling by •
(b) No person shall:
( 1) Provide service, offer to provide service or
advertise for the performance of service without having
obtained a franchise from the city of Tigard;
( 2) Accumulate, store, .collect, transport, dis-
=! pose of or resource recover solid waste except in compliance
with this chapter, other 4ity ordinances, and Chapter 459,
=e Oregon Revised Statutes,
ddealingrwith
solid
ated hasteder manny a ementent
and regulations and amen P
foregoing. (Ord. 78-64 S2, 1978) • !
+ 11.04.030 Definitions, (a) "Compensation" means and
inclu es:
(1) Any type of consideration paid for service, in-
cluding, without limitation, rent, lease payments andmonany
f{
other direct or indirect provision for pay
ment
goods, services or benefits by owners, tenants, lessees, oc-
f cupants or similar persons;
i (2) The exchange of services between persons; and
� (3) The flow of consideration from the person owning
or possessing the solid waste to the person providing the
service or or from the
essirson providing
e solid the
e.service to the per-
'� son owning possessing• � r
i
k_M- 153-1 (Tigard 1/15/79)..
11.04.040
g•-�'` (b) "Council" means the city council of the city of
• ::• Tigard.
(c) "Franchise" means the right to provide service
granted to a person pursuant to this chapter.
(d) "Person" means any individual, partnership,
association, corporation, trust, firm, estate, joint
venture or other public or private legal entity.
(e) "Putrescible material" means organic materials
that can decompose and may give rise to foul-smelling, of-
fensive odors or products.
(f) 'Resource recovery" means the process of obtain-
ing useful material oresources
materialsfrom
recovery� waste
recycling
and including energy recovery,
and reuse of or from solid waste.
(g) "Recycling" means any process by which.solid
t waste materials are transformed into new products in such
i a manner that the original products lose their identity.
(h) "Reuse" means the return of a commodity into the
" economic stream for use in the same kind of application
i as before without a change in its identity.
(i) "Service" means the collection and transportation
of solid waste by persons for compensation.
i {j) "Solid waste" means all putrescible and non-
luding but not
putreacible wastes, inclimited to garbage,
rubbish, refuse, ashes, wastepaper and cardboards residential,
commercial, industrial, demolition and construction wastes;
F ',• discarded home and industrial appliances: vegetable or animal
solid and semisolid wastes= dead animals, a.nd other wastes;
3 (1) For the purpose of this subsection, "waste"
means any material that is no longer wanted by or is no
longer usable by the generator, producer or source of the
material, which material is to be disposed of or to be
resource-recovered by another person. The fact that ma-
terials, which would otherwise come within the definition of
"waste" may from time to time have value and thus be
resource-recovered does not remove them from this definition.
i - Source-separated wastes are "wastes" within this subsection.
'i (2) The term "solid waste" does not include any
£ .N "hazardous waste" as defined by or pursuant to ORS Chapter
459. (Ord. 78-64 53, 1978) .
11.04.040 Franchise Granted to certain arsons--
SCO22 re u at ons. a Subject to the provisions of
t s sect on, s chapter, the city charter, and any amend-
. •menta to these documents, there is hereby granted to the
following persons an exclusive franchise to provide service
within the exclusive area shown within a map of existing
' franchised areas on the effective date of the ordinance
' codified in this chapter, which map is hereby attached
hereto, marked "Exhibit A," and by reference is hereby
-' incorporated herein.
as
153-2 (Tigard 1/15/7.9)
11.04 .040
(b) The franchisees are:Ai ►ole `�1p°:•! �" ►'"'�y L-o a R L� �t
(1) Area I. Fs =-s -tel Serv+ e,-.,Trtte. . Haab
771S Frlik, President,
(�Q Qvx F3�j Slno�woud,,o2 9710 -rAWAS
g7�;33 Service, Inc. , G•}
(2) Area ZI. Muller Sanitary pre.
Muller, President, :W °`y,el Av& -g,fi .d
9700
.� ;5U)(3) Area III. Schmidt's Sanitary Service, Inc. ,
John Schmidt, President, 8325 SW Ross, Tigard, Ore.
17223;
(c) Where any area is annexed to the
g city
on Cof Ti gard far
and the area had been franchised by
solid waste collection service prior to annexation, the
county franchise shall be recognized as to the area; but
service, term and other requirements shall be those of this
Inof chapter. If the area was franchi3e tothe area shallobe addedd
in subsection (b) of this section
by the city manager by amendment to "Exhibit A." For
persons other than those listed in subsection (b) of this
section, an acceptance ofefranchisise04ust be signedthischapter•
and
recorded as provided in
(d) Nothing in this franchise
from transporting,his section sdispos-
t person
( 1) Prohibit- any
ing resource recovering waste produced by himself so long
as he complies with iRevisedeStatutes,her city
dealin�giwithesolid
and Chapter 459 Oregon
waste management, and regulations promulgated under any of
the foregoing. For purposes of this subsecbioA, solid
similar
waste produced by a tenant,
person is produced by p ersonseeand occotubYntherlandlord,
property owner or agent of either the landlord ox property
owners
( 2) Prohibit any person from transporting, dis-
posing of or resource recovering, sewage sludge, septic
pumpings and cesspool pump 9
( 3) Prohibit any person licensed as a motor ve-
hicle wrecker diagosi g afORS lor4utetizseq.
n9 motor cvehic esg•
transporting,
or motor vehicle parts;
( 4) Prohibit the city council from withdrawing certain solid waste services. bY amendment to this chapter on
the basis of a finding that such regulation is not neces-
sary for the implementation aneseryiceedistrictssolid
s of atter
or a city, county or expolit
waste management plan;
{ 5) prohibit any person transporting solid waste
through the cityLala contractor s* not temploy ed into demolish,the
{ 6) Prohibit
construct, or remodel a building rors s truand construction but
not limited to land alaaring ope
` wastes, ,froia hauling waste created in aonnection with such
employment in equipment owned by the contractor and operated
by contractor's employees;.
153-3 (Tigard 1/15/79)
11.04 .050--11 .04.060
(1) Franchisees shall be given advance notice of
a hearing on the subject and an opportunity to be heard;
(2) if, after the hearing and on the basis of
written findings, the council directs the service be pro-
vided, the franchisees shall be given a reasonable
opportunity to provide the service or subcontract with other
persons to provide it;
(3) if franchisees do not provide the service within
the specified reasonable time, the council may issue a
franchise or franchises
franchiseethat
underservice
thisasubsection (g)nd limited to on-
route recycling. applicable requirements of this chapter.
shall comply with all
(4) Nothing in this subsection shall prevent tthea
franchisees Fran► insttion nootrifrom including income and expense
council determination
in the rate justification section. (Ord. 78-64 S4, 1978) .
11.04.050 Franchise--Term---Automatic renewal when.
(a) e r g ts, privi eges an n t a ranc se granted
herein shall continue and be in full
force
to subject and inlulling
the thirty-first day of December, termsas set
conditions and payment of franchise fees . to the city
forth in this chapter.
(b) unless the council acts to s herein granted.meach Januaryrlst,
re
newals of the franchise
the franchises
ra a�i3anuary lstorentallly(Ord renewed78-64 S5,t1978) . ten
years from
11.04.060 Franchise--Fees. (a) Effective July 1,
1978, as compensat on or a ranchise granted to each
the
franchisee and for the use of city
yts theta,percent offranchisee
shall pay to the city a fee equal
ree
cash receipts resulting from the solid waste services con-
zs ducted under the franchise. Such fees shalldbss�ollowing
on a quarterly basis and paid within thirty Y
the and of each quarter calendar -year period. Each franchise
shall maintain an adequate bookkeeping system showing the
£ � gross cash receipts resulting from the solid waste services
Records shall be' conducted audit by r theauthorized�personnel designated by theon at franchise
times for au
city administrator.
_ (b) Wilful misrepresentation of gross cash receipts
te cause for inediate re-
by a franchisee shall constitusuant to Bennion 111.04.080 of
vocation of the franchise, pur
this chapter.
(c) The franchise fee shall be in lieu of any business
fee or tax, but shall not be in lieu
lideense or regulatory fee City of Tigard. (Ord.
of any ad valorem tax, imposed by
-: 78-64 S6, 1978) .
i=-
153-5 (Tigard 1/15/79)
z _ _
• 11.04 .040 '
r.r
�_ ( 7) Prohibit the collection, transportation and
'biz's reuse of repairable or cleanable discards by private
charitable organizations regularly engaged in such business
or activity including, without limitation, Salvation Army,
Goodwill, St. Vincent De Paul, and similar organizations;
( �) Prohibit the operation of a fixed location
where the generator, producer, source or franchised collector
of solid waste brings that waste to a .fixe bled onforhowever, !
transfer, disposal or resource recovery; p
that the establishment or maintenance of any such location
brought into being after April 1, 1978, shall be only by
permit issued by the city administrator;
( 9) Prohibit the collection, transportation or I
redemption of beverage containers under ORS Chapter 459;
(10) Prohibit a person from transporting- or dis-
posing of waste that he produces
es as assinciOf dental
part of
the regular carrying on of
er-
vice; gardening or landscaping service; or rendering;
(11) Require franchisee to store, collect, trans-
port, dispose of or resource recover "y hazard
movidedte
as defined by or pursuant to ORS Chapter 459; P
however, that franchisee
may e
of handling such cteaandiapartefrom thissiness franchise
and chapter;
(12) Prohibit a nonprofit charitable, benevolent
or civic organization from recycling wastes provided that
�'�°• is not such collection regsilar or periodic business of
such organization and that, for all such collection after
April 1, 1978, a subcontract shall be obtained from the
franchisee in the area or areas to be served or that a
permit is obtained from the city administrator.
(e) Where a permit is required from the city adminis-
trator, it shall be issued only upon a finding that the
service is needed, has not been provided by the franchisee
or, in the case of fixed base facilities, by
+ sideration to the
The City Administrator shall give due
nsuch conditions as
purposes of this chapter. He may !
he determines are necessary to obtain compliance with this E
chapter and may restrict the term of such permit. The
permittee will comply with all applicable provisions of this
chapter.
(f) Solid waste placed out for collection, whether or
not source-smpa=aeteiac dbelongs
for coilectionfranchisee
a permittee,
belongs toor,
the permittee.
(g) Not withstanding other provisions of this section,
if the council finds that on-route recycling is technologic
tally and economically feasible and directs that it be in-
stituted:
;1a
«4
153-4 (Tigard 1/15/79) �
M.. ;.
r
• ' 11 .04.080
containers or drop boxes supplied by franchisee is dependent
~"r upon availability of those containers or boxes.
(b) A franchisee may require a contract from a customer
who requires an unusual service involving added or specialized
equipment solely to provide that service. The purpose of
this subsection is to prevent the added cost from being
assessed against other ratepayers if the customer later
withdraws from service. (Ord. 78-64 57, 1978) .
11..04 .080 Franchise--Transfer, sus ension modification
or revocat on--Con t ons. a The franchisees shall not
transfer s M—RcKise or any portion thereof to other
persons without sixty days prior written notice of intent
and the subsequent written approval of city council, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The city council
shall approve the transfer if the transferee meets all appli-
cable requirements met by the original franchisees. A
pledge of this franchise as financial security shall be
considered as a transfer for the purposes of this subsection.
The city council may attach whatever conditions it deems
,appropriate to guarantee maintenance of service and compliance
with this chapter.
(b) Failure to comply with a written notice to provide
the services required by this chapter or to otherwise comply
with the provisions of this chapter after written notice
and a reasonable opportunity to comply shall be grounds
formodification, revocation.or suspension of franchise.
(1) After written notice from the -city coundil
that such grounds exist, franchisee shall have thirty days
from the date of mailing of the notice in which to comply
or to request a public hearng before the city council.
(2) If franchisee fails to comply within the specific
time or fails to comply with the order of the city council
entered upon the basis of written findings at the public
hearing, the city council may suspend, modify or revoke the
franchise or make such action contigent upon continued
noncompliance.
f (3) At a public hearing, franchisee and other
interested persons shall have an opportunity to present
oral, written or documentary evidence to the city council.
The finding of the city council thereon shall be conclusive)
provided, however that such action may be reviewed by a
( court on a writ of review.
(4) In the event that the city council finds an im-
mediate and serious danger to the public through creation
of a health or safety hazard, it may take action to alleviate
T; such _condition within a time specified in the notice to the
franchisee and without a public hearing prior to taking such
action. (Ord. 78-64 S9, 1978) .
.:A
r
l
i53-7 (Tigard 1/15/79)
_ �-�� � k ` �.�. _.� .� �. r „a.. - •T4s � .�,. „� ''Ysa
11.04.070 .
11 04 070 Responsibility of franchise. (a) The
Franchises shall:
• ( I) Resource-recover or dispose of wastes collected
compliance with
Ch sites pter 459,approved
egony the RevisedtStatutesthat randnregulat ons promul-
gated
, 9
gated thereunder;
( 2) Provide and keep in force public liability in-
surance with a thirty-day cancellation clause in the amount
of not less than one hundred thousand dollars for injury to
a single person, three hundred thousand dollarsto a ail
of persons and fifty thousand dollars property damage,
relating to a single occurrence, which shall be evidenced
by a certificate of insurance filed with the city recorder;
the insurance shall indemnify and save the city harmless
against liability or damage which may arise or ogcur from
an injury to persons
or propeeerty thli
resulting from the fran-
chisee's opera
( 3) Within thirty days after the effective date e
of the ordinance codified in this chapter, file with the
cceptance of the franchise;
city recorder a written a
( 4) Furnish sufficient collection vehicles, con-
tainers, facilities, personnel, finances and scheduled
days for collections in each area of the city necessary to
provide all types of service required under this chapter or 't
subcontract with others to provide such service pursuant to
' �. this chapter; - _
�•;:;; ( 5) Provide a cash- security deposit or a perrmance
bond in the amount of five thousand dollars to guarantee
payment to the city or other affected person of a judgment
secured against the franchise holder because of work per-
formed that doss not conform with the requirements of this
chapter or other ordinances of they-city. The deposit or
ear after expiration of the
bond shall continue until one yE
demands made against the
franchise, or until all claims or
franchisee have been settled or secured;
( 6) Collect no single-family residential solid
waste before five a.m. or after seven p.m. unless this
., condition is waived by the city administrator or his designee;
( 7) Provide collection and disposal of solid waste
from all city facilities, city parks, city sidewalk con-
tainers and city activity area at no cost to the city on a
regular schedule;
( 8) Make collection no less often than once each
week, except for will-call collections and drop box opera-
tions, and except as provided in Section 11.04.140;
( 9) Permit inspection by the city of the franchisee's
facilities, equipment and personnel at reasonable times;
(10) Respond to all calls for special hauling
requiring equipment regularly supplied by franchiser within
' nine -isagreeablsaid e s
cialhaulingnless a rdf
pickup tothecustomer
� .
- - 153-6 (Tigard 1/1 /79)
. s.
, r
• 11.04.090
11.04.090 Rates for service. (a) The rates to be
i �'•r
charge to a persons y e ranchisee shall be reasohabie,
uniform, and based upon the level of service rendered,
distance, concentration of dwelling units and other factors
which the city council considers to justify variations in
rates that outweigh the benefits of having a single rate
structure unless otherwise noted in this chapter;
(b) Nothing in this section is intended to prevent:
(1) The reasonable establishmentofwunifoaste rm
classes
of rates based upon length of haul; typeo
collected, transported, disposed of, salvaged or utilized;
or the number, type and location of customer's service, or
upon other factors as long as such rates are reasonably
based upon cost of the particular service and are approved
by the city council in the same manner as other rates;
(x) The franchisee
from community, benevolent at
or
reduced cost for the
charitable program.
(c) Rates to be charged by the franchises under this
ouncilas
chapter shall be set by the city cCept,bincreasesion in charges
deemed necessary by the council.
to the franchises for solid waste disposal site fees imposed
t by a goves-rsnental agency may be included-in the rates by
Ll resolution, provided such increases are evenly
counc
councdistribated among the rates. The franchises shall provide
sixty days written notice with accompanying justification for
-shallall other proposed ate
changes.posesofthis chapter and tuncil h a due
consideration to thePurPo
.� I Fos
t,
4
,
coat
"mks Uroo-sooOVAMP
`r5 o nit -service,�'�"e`n`_s n
- � s eces..fn-si • •�
-
88
to--€-raseh-isee-on-the s�tra�•t �
fa ^extra-chaa• a--•�e�CuFs'
fn 3,19-8
j
cow
Wid+ng tire 11M
,....s,►turda
a su R3sge
a s on~taitet.....to d
• (d) The franchisee shall be p vided with thirty-
M day prior written notice with accompanying justification for
a city initiated reduction in rate schedule.
• (e) Unless a governmental unit or legislative body -
` has raised or lowered the cost of providing service or
there is a substantial increase in the cost of doing busi
�. _ tees that was not provided for in the previous rate adjust-
ment, rate adjustments shall be made annually on the follow-
ing schedule:
153-8 (Tigard 9/83)
k
11.04.090
t
z
'b,,T F
Moerr�
(1) On or before -rt, the franchisee shall
rt of current-income and expense together with
- supply a repo erase for the year beginning January
projected income and exp December
1st and ending the
lowing incomeeandsexpensehreported
with
existing and proposed rates.
subsection (c)
may include any or all er plicabledtonthe franchised busi-
of this section and others app
mess. Fiscal year franchisees snselandtincomete revenue
recordsand
to
expense from date of actualpe
June 30th. dministrator shall report to the
T �'- i its and propose
council by on the franchisee repo
rate adjustments, if a y . He may make such recommendations
libes
as appropriate to the rate determination. A copy
delivered to each franchisee. et a hearing on any proposed
(3) The council may
rate adjustment.
(4) Unless there is good cause shown and recorded
the council shall act upon
in the minutes of the 30�and the adjustment
any rate- adjusttae b 1st Rate adjustments shall be by
shall take effect
resolution and or r of the council•
ired from each
(5) The reports not aerate adjustment isfranchisee
regardless of whetherrates or an interim rate for a new or
(f) Emergency {�
altered service may be set by the city admini-strator: pro-
altered
ro-
vided, however, that an emergency or interim rate is not
valid for more than six months from the effective date.
om
1 the
The city administrator shall report aany emergency
or interim1 for
rate adopted together with justification
action by resolution and order, if the rate is to continue
for more than six months. the council are fixed rates f
Rates estab11 notlished bythan th
' and thefr nchiseepursuant tocsubnecthare shafon( b)f2)re or essof this e
' fixed rate
- section.
•; (h) Nonscheduled services shall be charged at the
reasonable cost of providing the service taking into ction
on
sideration the factors in subsection (c) of this
and as determined by franchisee. the Council may set uniform
in establishing rates,
rates, uniform rates by zone and different rates for collectors
where there is a service and cost justification.
y ..�- (j) Until changed by the council, rates to be charged
are those in effose ratesr.
e'ct on eisfattached tofective d the ordinanof the ce
A schedule of those
herein, marked Exhibit "B," and by this reference is incor- t
porated herein,
(k) if approved in a rate schedule, a "start charge"
for new service
"and a "restart charge" for reinstituted
s
service may be added. I '
t r -
�i 153-9 (Tigard 1/15/79)
r-
wh
11.04.100
(1) Franchisees may request and the council shall
schedule a p on bhe application for adjustment
public hearing public hearing has been
or action of the council where no
held prior to rate determinaq�rne•pay�aent for residential and
(m) Franchisee may
multi-family residential service up to three months in
advance, and may bill up to three months in advance franchisee
_ rears or any combination. Where billed Paymein ntforcomplete
will refund a prorated portion of the Pay Where billed
months in which serviceadjustment not to be t shall be effective until
in advance, no rate 7
the end of the advance Payment'
(n) Any Person who receives solid waste n�cresu suchfrom
the franchisees
shall a rent&I orllease fe for acility shall' be
service.
liable such
for payment for sa,:vices provided to a tenant Of such
dwelling if the tenant failsmto make- trental or lease
servicers. The owner of more units shall be primarily respon-
facility having two
sible for services provided tortthe the df such facility,
and shall be billed for the
at time of service for drop-
and
Franchisee may
box service or for any customer who has notestablished
prd. 78 64
credit with franchisee. (Ord. 63-19 S1,
S8, 1978) .
11.04.100 Container r irements 0 coupe on9liannita-
+. :
tions. Ina on to comp once w
mations promulgated pursuant thereto and in Section
11.04.100s purposes of this chapter, to prevent
(1) To achieve the other and
recurring back and other injurii�struto �tionstoscollectors
persons, to comply with safety _ and 1 with
from the Mate Accident
gident ins rr nceental rued,a ds s� comply
safety, health an
(h) solid waste cans shall have a round
the top thatopro-
sidep tapering outward to the opening
vides for unobstructed dumping
of the contents, a bail or
. handles on opposite sides, a close-fitting lid with
.= handle, not to exceed thirty-two gallons' capacity, 'and be
watertight in construction. Cans shall be made of mein
tal
or some rigid material that will not crackle t break
freesing weather and shall be waterproof,
and easily cleanable. No solid waste can or container shall
eucc®sd sixty pounds gross loaded weight, and putrescible
4=04I.I(garbage
a ) shall be placed in plastic bags or securely
mapped in paper after being drained of liquids.
(B) Sunken refuse can
vegrounds iby the owner not
fore
. used, unless they are placed
service.
153-10 (Tigas3 9/83)
11.04.100
on the scheduled collection day, the user shall
(C) int which does not jeopar-
provide safe access to the pickup point
dine the safety of the drivers and orf a lrisk ito theon person
the
person
motoring public or create a h
providing service. Cans must be in a visible (from the
street or alley)_ location which may be serviced and driven
to by satellite vehicles wherebehindlanl- Access musto not
require the collector to pa obstructions such as
her
vehicle or to pass under low hanging
eaves, tree branches,passage or ele�ansamustlbes which
obstruct safe pa 9e � andfromcans
at ground level, outside of garages, fences and other en
= closures, and within one hundred feet of the street right-
' of-way or curb. Where
orhotherhstructiurenor road is incapathat a bleOf
bridge, cul
safely carrying the weight of the collection vehicle. the
Collector shall
not rovidetarSafeosuch alternativetaccess point or
� ure or
The user shallP
j system. (D) All solid waste cans located at single-family
residences shall be placed together in one authorized loca-
tion on collection da .
E) Alllsolid wastelrreeceptacles, including but not
(
limited to cans, containers and drop boxes,
merloreuser�.taine
in a safe and sanitary condition by the
,�- (g) solid waste service customers shall place items
not intended for pickup at least three feet from solid
waste can(s) or containers) . to a solid
W
:.t (G) No person shall block the access
wasx.
te container oer onr drcpsh�ll deposit material in or remove
s (s) p lied by a fran-
material from any drop box or container supe
chile without permission of franchisee. solid waste
(I) No persons shallatakanchise or ee or peve rmitted under
placed out for collection by
this chapter. rson shall place any hazardous waste,
..i (J) No pe
j; as defined by or pursuant to ORS Chapter 459, out for collec-
z lace
tion by another person, franchisee or person, franchisee
.' it in any container supplied by such a pe .
or permittee without prior written notrmiittee,oandnalsoCupon
tante the person, franchisee or pe
compliance with any requirements of ORS Chapter 459 and any
regulations thereunder.
rules or
? - (r All putrescible solid wastes shall be removed
once
of
from any premises at least regardless
:1 of whether or not confined in Y
cO
i drop box or can.
.r.
j
153-11 (Tigard 1/25/79)
11.04.110
(L) No person shall use any solid waste collection
..'�-..
��•' container of one cubic yard or more in capacity unless it
is supplied by the franchisee or is approved by him on the
basis of safety, equipment compatibility, availability or
equipment and the purposes of this chapter.
(m) Containers (and drop boxes) shall be cleaned
by the customer or user; provided, however, that the fran-
chisee shall paint the exterior and provide normal main-
tenance. The customer or user shall be liable for damage
beyond reasonable wear and tear. hall supply a location and
(N) Container customers s
to meet standards of
properly maintain containers so as
the Consumer Products Safety Commission.
(0) All loads of solid wastes that may scatter,
blow, leak or otherwise escape, and whether on collection
vehicles or others, shall be covered during transit to dis-
posal or resource recovery.,
(P) No person shall install a stationary compactor
for collection unless the franchisee has been notified and
has the necessary. equipment to handle the solid wastes.
(Q)" A container for hazardous or other special
wastes shall be appropriately labeled and placed in a loca-
tion inaccessible to the public. if the -container is re-
usable, At shall be suitable for cleaning and be cleaned.
(See" also requirements of OILS Chapter 459 and rules and
regulations thereunder.)
t.t.; (2) No stationary compactor or other container for
commercial .or industrial use shall exceed the safe-loading
design limit or operation of the collection vehicles pro-
vided by the franchisee serving the service area. upon
petition of a group of customers reasonably rrequirng
iran-
special service, the city council may require
chisee to provide provision for vehicles capable of handling
specialized loads, including but not limited to front-load-
ing collection trucks and drop-box trucks and systems.
E (3) To prevent injuries to users and collectors,
stationary compacting devices
s8for han
applicable shall comply with and stateisafetyeregula-
tions.
? (4) Any vehicle used by any person to transport wastes
shall be so loaded and operated as to prevent the wastes from
4 dripping, dropping, sifting, blowing or otherwise escaping
s from the vehicle onto any public right-of-way or lands ad-
jacent thereto. (Ord. 78-64 S15, 1978) .
11.04.110 Offensive wastes prohibited. No person shall
have waste on properAty that Ts oYfensive or hazardous to the
a health or safety of others or which creates offensive odors
i ; or a condition of unsightliness. (Ord. 78-64 S16, 1978) .
153-12 (Tigard 1/15/79)
11.04.120--11.04.143
cr= 11.04.120 Unauthorized de sits rohianced. N with Cher
san s a wi out su orization an comp sit waste
disposal site requirements of this chapter,of
ePoother.
on public property or the private property
Streets and other public places are not authorized as
places to deposit waste except as specific provisions for
containers have been made. (Ord. 78-62 S17, 1978) .
11.04.130 Interruption of franchisees service. The
is
franc ee agrees, as a condition of a ranchse, that when-
ever the city council finds that the failure of service or
threatened failure of service would result in creation of
an immediate and serious health hazard or serious public
nuisance, the city council may, after 'a minimum of twenty-
four hours' actual notice ueststhe ranchisee providedor public
four
re
hearing if the franchisee 9
another person to temporarily provide the service or to use
ilities and equipment of a Fran-
and operate the land, fac
chisee to provide emergency service. The city
council shall
nd business upon abatement of
return any seized property aafter
the actual or threatened any interruption
incurredof iin,thedopera-
i payment to the city for y
tion of the solid waste service. (Ord. 78-64 S10, 1978) .
i
11.04.140 Terms tetianate seryOf 1ce bce t aranora
ieportion
,... f ranch see s a 1 not
► of his costars unless:
i.•?
(1) The street or road access is blocked and there
# is no alternate route and provided that the franchisee shall
restore service not later than twenty-four hours after
street or road access is opened;
(2) As determined by the franchisee, excessive weather
conditions render providing service unduly hazardous to
l ina
persons providing service or to the public or such t act-
tion is caused by accidents or casualties caused by
i of God, a public enemy, or a vandal, or road access is
blockedi
(;) A customer has not paid for provided service after
.= a regular billing and after a seven-day written notice from
'.} the date of mailing, which notice shall not be sent less F
than fifteen days after the first regular billing; or E
(4) Ninety days written notice .is given to the
city
council and to affected customers and written app
i obtained from the city council;
omply with the service
(5) The customer does not c
•i standards of Section 11.04.100 of the chapter. (Ord. 78-64 !
S11, 1978) .
t
i
4
.•: 153-13 (Tigard 1/15/79) R
ter .. .... ., , -
11,04.150--11.04.180
11.04.150 Subcontracts. The franchisees may subcon-
tract with others to provide a portion of the service where
the franchisees do not have the necessary equipment or ser-
vice capability. Such a subcontract shall not relieve the
franchisees of total responsibility for providing and main-
taining service and from compliance with this chapter.
(Ord. 78-64 512, 1978) .
11.04,160 Rules and regulations. The city administrator
or his esignee-may propose and prepare rules and regulations
pertaining to this chapter. The rules and regulations shall
be printed or typewritten, and be maintained for inspection
in the office of the city recorder. All proposed rules and
regulations promulgated under the authority of this section,
and all amendments thereto, shall be immediately forwarded
to the franchisee operating under this chapter for his re-
sponse. The franchisee shall have thirty days to respond
in writing to such proposed rules and regulations. The
rules and regulations and any amendments thereto shall be
approved by the city council following said thirty-day
period. (Ord. 78-64 514, 1978) .
11.04.170 Enforcement officers. The city administrator
shall enforce the provisions of this chapter, and his
agents,* including police officers and other employees so
_; ,�:•; designated, may enter affected premises at reasonable times
for the purpose of determining compliance- with the pro-
" visions and terms of this chapter. (Ord. 78-64 S13, 1978) .
Gfvl�. S►,�FeAcnoN --
»�' 11.04.180 Violation deemedUmisdemeanor' when--Penalty.
Violation Ey any person or the provisions of su sect on (b)
,i of Section 11.04.020 or subsections (1) (G) through (1) (K) and
(1) (M) through (1) (0) of Section 11.04 .100 of this chapter shall
be deemed to be a misdemeanor and shall be punishable, upon
! conviction, by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars.
(Ord. 78-64 519, 1978) .
4=y;
j
<= 153-14 (Tigard 1/15/79)
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: 11/24%86 DATE SUBMITTED: 11/17/86
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Dover Landing PREVIOUS ACTION: Approval by Council
PD 2-86 Amendment to Resolution With Conditions
86-75 PREPARED BY: Keith Lidera
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The applicant has requested an amendment to the conditions that require all of
108th Avenue to be improved to a minor collector standard. This would require
an amendment to Resolution 86-75 which outlines the conditions of approval.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the request.
2. Deny the request.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Approve the request.
sb148
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: City Council November 17, 1986
FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval for Dover Landing (PD 2-86)
On July 14, 1986, the City Council approved Dover Landing subject to
conditions (Resolution 86-75). Conditions 2 and 8 required that 108th Avenue
be developed to a minor collector standard. The applicant ib requesting that
the collector standard only apply to the portion of 148th Avenue that is north
of the proposed intersection with Riverwood Lane (Kent Drive). The local
street standard south of this intersection is intended to eliminate the need
to remove several mature trees that are near the existing road right-of-way,
The Engineering Division has no objection to the request since the section of
108th Avenue south of RivQrwood Lane will serve few properties and it will
r
Z function only as a local street.
Attached is a copy of Resolution 86-75, a vicinity map, and a copy of the
preliminary plat.
sb1A8
U'.k
G.9
if
`1
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 86-_-25
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER UPON CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF A
PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION (S7-86),
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD2-86), AND SENSITIVE LANDS PERMITS (SL4-86), ADOPTING
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
WHEREAS, this matter came before the City Council at its meeting of June 16,
1986 and was continued to June 23, 1986 upon an appeal by the applicant for
review of the Planning Commission's denial of the application request; and
WHEREAS, :the City Council had before it the Commission's denial, documentation
provided by the applicant as part of the application, staff report to the
Commission, supplemental staff report, Commission's final order, transcript
and minutes of the April 8, 1986 Commission hearing, letters from residents
submitted during the hearing process, applicant's appeal letter, and
applicant's request for a correction to the Commission minutes; and
WHEREAS, the applicable criteria in this decision are the following:
Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.3. 3.5.3, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, and 8.1.3
of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Chapters 18.50, 18.80, 18.84, 18.92,
18.160, 18.162, and 18.164 of the Tigard Community Development Code.
f WHEREAS, based on the record in this case, the City Council makes the
(o, following findings of fact:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
Section 1: The subject site is located on both sides of SW 108th Avenue and
north of the Tualatin River (WCTM 2S1 15A, T.L. 400 and WCTM 2S1
15AD, T.L. 100, 200, 300, and 400).
Section 2: The property is presently zoned R-5 in Washington County and R-2
(RQsidential, 2 units/acre) in the City of Tigard. The
Washington County segment is presently in the process of being
annexed to the City of Tigard with a R-4.5 (PD) (Residential,
4.5 units/acre, planned development) zone applying to the
property.
Section 3: The applicant requested approval of a subdivision and planned
development consisting of 92 detach:.a single family residences
on lots ranging from 4,800 to 28,000 square feet in size along
with supplemental requests to allow minor lot line adjustments
of up to 3 feet to be permitted with staff approval and
permission to construct a sewer line and street improvements
within a drainageway.
The City Council also makes the following conclusions of law based upon
the following findings:
Ct
RESOLUTION NO. 86-::7-5:
Page 1
a. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice
of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's
proposal.
b. Policy 3.1.1 will be satisfied provided that any portions of
lots 4 through 13 which exceed 25% slope are not graded or
filled without a Sensitive Lands Permit. Such a permit has been
requested to allow construction in the drainageway in the
northwest corner of the property and construction of a sanitary
sewer line and a portion of a cul-de-sac in the ravine. A
review of the preliminary plans indicates that the work proposed
can be accomplished in a manner consistent with this policy
except for the cul-de-sac. The proposed cul--de-sac is within
the 108th Avenue/113th Avenue ravine which is delineated by the
140 foot elevation and is identified as a significant wetland
! and wildlife habitat. Though the proposed cul-de-sac can be
successfully constructed within the area, it appears to be
unnecessary. The cul-pie-sac should be shortened so that it is
above the existing 140 foot contour or designed so only a small
portion lies below this elevation. A field visit with the
applicant and City Engineer would be the most appropriate way to
determine the street location.
C. Policies 3.2.3 and 3.5.3 call for dedication of flood plain
areas to be incorporated into the City's open space system. The
proposed dedication is consistent with this policy. A ralated
item which must be resolved is the proposed pedestrian access to
the greenway. The access easements shown travel straight down
slopes that range between 25 and 35%. These easements must be
replaced by a pedestrian path which is a feasible means of
public access to the river.
d. Policies 7.1,2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 can be satisfied because
adequate water. sewer, and storm drainage facilities will be
required to serve the development prior to approval of the final
plat. The applicant indicates that these facilities will be
provided within the subdivision as required by the City
standards.
Also, the storm sewer system will be modified so that the
proposed development will not have an adverse impact upon the
drainageway and around water areas on the west side of 108th
Avenue.
e. Policy 8.1.1 calls for the provision of a safe and efficient
street system which accommodates present and future needs. The
alignment of Riverwood Lane should be continued through this
development as a minor collector unless the Coiaprehensive Plan
is modified in this regard. 108th Avenue will function as a
collector and should also be improved as a minor collector. The
City will require full and interim improvements to 108th Avenue
in conjunction with the development as well as resolution of the
present site distance limitations at the Durham/108th
Cj intersection.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
Pago 2
f. Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval
relating to street improvements are completed. The full street
improvements on 108th Avenue where the street abuts the
development will be required in conjunction with Phase I of the
project. Interim improvements to the remainder of 108th Avenue
will occur prior to October 1, 1987. These improvements will
adequately accommodate the anticipated traffic generated by the
project.
g. Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal does
meet the density requirements of the R-4.5 zone.
h. Chapter 18.92 is satisfied because the proposed density is
consistent with Code requirements. On page 3 of the applicant's
narrative, the density calculations are presented. The
calculations are correct except that they do not account for a
57,280 square foot area of the subject property which is
presently within the City and zoned R-2. By adjusting for this
factor, the allowable number of units is 82 as indicated in the
supplemental staff report. Although many of the lots are less
than the 7,500 square foot minimum in the R-4.5 zone, the
Planned Development chapter of the Code (Chapter 18.80) allows
for small iota provided that the average density does not exceed
what is prescribed by the underlying zone.
I. Chapter 18.80 is satisfied because the proposal is consistent
with the purpose and requirements of this chapter pertaining to
planned developments. Planned developments are intended to be
used in undeveloped area such as this. As noted above, the Code
_ does not require the enforcement of lot size and dimension
standards within a planned development.
J . Chapter 18.84 covers Sensitive Lands issues within flood plains,
drainageways, and the 108th/113th Avenue ravine. The
application can meet the applicable criteria. The 100 year
flood plain of the Tualatin River will be dedicated and a
pedestrian path will be constructed along the river. The length
of Dover Court will be reduced to minimize any encroachment on
the 1O8th/113th Avenue ravine. Also, the amendment to the storm
saser system recommended by the City Engineer will reduce any
storm water runoff impact upon downstream properties.
Though not directly affected by the subdivision proposal, lots 4
through 13 may require a Sensitive Lands Permit in order to
develop on slopes that exceed 25x. Based upon the contours
shown on the preliminary plat, it appears that at a minimum
Sensitive Lands approval will be required prior to the
development of Lots 9 through 12.
k. Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal
does meet the requirements set forth for the submission and
approval of a preliminary plat.
RESOLUTION N0. 86—
P
Pago 3
I. Chapter 18.162 covers the City's requirements regarding lot line
adjustments. The proposed ability to adjust side lot lines
after the plat is recorded can meet City requirements but the
procedure for adjusting property lines should follow the process
described below:
The Community Development Code provides a two-step review
of lot line adjustments. A preliminary application is
first evaluated and a decision is made. If the preliminary
application is approved, a final application is submitted
containing the final lot line adjustment map and regal
descriptions. Following City approval, the map and legal
descriptions are recorded with Washington County.
Conflicts may result in relation to the location of utility
services and driveway locations. The final lot line
adjustment map and legal descriptions shall be required for
each adjustment that occurs under provisions of the
preliminary approval. The map and descriptions should
include information regarding the precise location of
existing utilities and driveways. A certification from an
engineer should be provided which indicates that the
adjustment will not adversely affect existing utilities or
that the facilities will be relocated to the satisfaction
of those utility company(s) involved. An costs associated
with change in utility location will be borne by the
developer.
The PD overlay zone does not have a minimum lot width
requirement, but the 5O± foot wide lots are relatively
narrow for single family detached residences. The 4-foot
side yard requirement shall remain in effect as well as the
5-foot driveway setback requirement contained in T.M.C.
Section IS.04.080(b). Variances or waivers of these
requirements shall be viewed with disfavor.
a. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval
process for the final plat.
The City Council, therefore, orders the above referenced application be
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. LMLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO
RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT.
2. Standard full and half-street improvements including sidewalks,
curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities
shall be installed along the SW 108th Avenue frontage. Said
improvements along SW 108th Avenue shall be built to not less than
2 City minor collector street standards and conform to alignment of the
existing centerline.
C,
RESOLUTION 100. 86-�ZL
Page 4
. r
3. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans
and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a
Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public
improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for
approval.
4. Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as
part of the public improvement plans.
5. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until
after the Engineering Division has issued approved public improvement
plans. The Division will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond,
the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee.
Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction
compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the i
' Issuance of approved public improvement plans.
6. Prior to approval of the public improvement plans, the applicant
shall submit data sufficient for the City Engineer to determine that
the subdivision complies with the requirements of the Comprehensive
FPlan Transportation Map. Unless the Transportation flap is modified
by the City Council, the data submitted must include evidence that
S.W. Kent Drive can be connected to Riverwood Lane with an alignment
that meets the City standards for minor collector streets. Unless
the Transportation Map is modified by the City Council, S.W. Kent
Drive shill be designed and platted to minor collector street
standards.
7. A one (1') foot reserve strip granted to the City of Tigard shall be
provided at the terminus of S.W. Kent Drive and, also at the terminus
of B.W. River Lane. Special permission need be granted to T.L. 0700
P and &800 by the City to allow crossing of the reserve strip.
S. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the
S.W. 108th Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet
from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied
to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by Washington
s County. The dedication document shall be on City forms, and approved
by the Engineering Section, or shall be detailed on the plat.
9. S.W. 108th Avenue shall remain open to traffic at all times during
construction.
10. Street Centerline Monumentation
A. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of
all streets and roadway rights-of-wy shall be monumented before
the City shall accept a street improvement.
B. All centerline monuments shall be placed in a monument box
conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes
shall be set at design finish grade of said strebt or roadway.
RESOLUTION no. 86-
C. The follow,..d centerline monuments shall be .,et:
(1) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections
created with "collector" or other existing streets, shall be
set when the centerline alignment of said "collector" or
other street has been established by or for the City;
(2) Center of all cul-de-sacs;
(3) Curve points. Point of intersection (P.I.) when their
position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise
beginning and ending points (B.C. and E.C.).
(4) All sanitary and storm locations shall be placed in positions
that do not interfere with centerline monumentation.
11.-A Sensitive lands Permit will be required for any landform alteration,
including the development of single family homes, on slopes greater
than M.
12. Construction of the proposed sanitary sewerage improvement
of bliall t
commence until posting of a 100% performance bond, payment
ic
improvement plan chuck and inspection fees and execution of (and City
acceptance of) a construction compliance agreement occurs.
13. Construction of improvements below the 140 foot elevation contour west
of tooth Avenue or within the 100 year flood plain shall occur only
for the eMER22as of bikepath AnLd other e9blic iw rovement requirements
only during the period between April 30th and October 1st or at other
times approved in advance and in writing by the City Engineer.
14. A site grading plan shall be submitted with the improvement plans.
The site grading plan shall include provisions for erosion control
including temporary erosion control during construction. No
construction shall occur until the site grading plan has been approved
by the City Engineer.
15. The applicant shall construct interim street improvements on S.W.
tooth Avenue from S.W. Durham Road to the point where Pull street
improvements are required by Condition 2 above. Interim street
improvements shall include a minimum 22 foot pavement width. Also. 3
foot gravel shoulders and drainage ditches shall be constructed unless
otherwise specifically approved by the City Engineer and Washington
County in conjunction with Phase I improvements, but not later than
October 1, 1987.
16. The applicant shall obtain from Washington County a letter of service-
ability and approval of public improvement plans for S.W. tooth Avenue.
17. At the intersection of S.W. tooth Avenue and S.W. Durham Road, the
interim street improvements shall include improvements adequate to
provide a minimus intersection sight distance of 450 feet. The
intersection sight distance .shall be based on an eye height of 3.5
feet and an object height of 4.25 feet above the road, and shall be
measured from the center of tooth Avenue at a point 10 feet south of
the edge of the Durham Road pavement.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-�
Page 6
18. Storm drainage from streets and other public improvements shall be
conveyed in closed conduits and discharged at points within the flood
plain area. All storm drainage conduits shall be located in public
rights-of-way or in easements dedicated to the public.
19. Any or-site or off-site sanitary and storm sewer easement, which may
be necessary for provision of service, shall be on City forms and
approved by the Engineering Division; on-site easements should be
denoted on the subdivision plat.
20. The existing (access-egress) easement across the north end of Tax Lots
#100-11400 shall be vacated; the cost thereof to be borne by the
applicant.
21. The lands which are within the 100 year flood plain shall be dedicated
to the public for greenway purposes. The flood plain boundary shall
be surveyed and clearly marked. Said markers shall be maintained
throughout the course of development.
22. The existing dwellings which are to remain must be connected to
sanitary sewerage facilities as soon as the facilities become
available.
23. An asphalt surfaced pedestrian/bicycle path with a width of 10 feet
shall be constructed along the Tualatin River within the boundaries of
the greenway. The path shall include one public pedestrian path
connection to S.W. River Drive at via a public right-of-way or public
easement in the vicinity of SW 108th. The easement width and
alignment shall be approved by the City Engineer.
24. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City Engineer,
the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington County.
25. ALL CONDITIONS BELOW SHALL BE HET PRIOR TO RECORDING ANY LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY.
A. The final lot line adjustment application(s) shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Director PRIOR TO RECORDING. The Lot
Line Adjustment documents shall be recorded by the City and a copy
shall be forwarded to the applicant. In addition to the
requirements of Section18.162.080 of the Code (copy enclosed), the
applicant shall provide information illustrating the location of
all utility facilities in the vicinity of the property line(:) to
be adjusted.
B. A registered engineer shall certify that each final lot line
adjustment will not have an adverse impact upon the utility
services within the subdivision and the service available to
individual lots.
C. Any relocation of utilities shall be approved by the appropriate
utility company. All cost incurred shall be borne by the
( developer or lot owner.
RESOLUTION NO. 86--
Page
6--Page 7
D. Variance or waiver requests to the 4 foot side yard setback
requirement or the driveway setback standard in TMS vided.08o(b)
must be compelling and substantial evidence must be provided.
E. one or more final lot line adjustment applications may be filed
for all lots in the development as provided by the above
condition. This approval shall expire within one year of the
final decision date noted below•
26. Four foot side yard setbacks are allowed but all other setback
standards of the underlying zones shall remain in affect.
27. Dover Court cul-de-sac shall be shortened to the City Engineer's
specifications.
28. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final
decision date noted below.
The Council further orders that the City Recorder send a copy of the final
order as a notice of decision in the matttar.
PASSED: This day of 1986.
'-- City of Tigard
ATTEST:
r
puty City Recorder - City of Tigard
KSL:bs129
ftSQumm no. 86-�-S
a r
. fnrffNffa?�f.f■f�f.frrf� ��lr■ ���� �'+"" �
AWN
am
Is
L. all
r rr r rr r• �� �i t �
t ; z :: Me
r• In
�'��nn.■■.� .ria• ani �� i�llMt ittate: im M
WIN
ANW
41
`�' �� , _:,���► �\\\\'1�\\\\lei\\, \. `U'1'��■l��t � `� �i��,. — ��`�., i�..�
♦ r. s'= i�� /CC1I ■��� ! /,� �tll a'a
aI Samr
Elm
wil
■■its
lilt
F��_� ' �� 1 17 Kill
V Ka
■ aa■n e'r'r �: 'L�!` ,r,M�i
•/M
f •
M r'a
The
wi[
acr
!/
t / cun:
Dra.
couI
op
�I
Wt
} l 75
7.9
Al 0 72 4 70
Men 2
E ,;11 P I
01 ti
.Vil.
1
w , 16 17
a
v y
Q ll "7 61
3 a�F J �3 '$ JJ?j 7.1 -1 t lo. -
�
rs-
4!
000 66
=r 45 SO
33
31 .(32 —'
34 44, h 64
I
.
is 43 3 ne_ L!
AIL-
6 Z!
3c 53
30 d +2 _,a •a�
ss •°-
J7 41 54
•1
i
40 S7 , 60 \\
t �1 t ' 3 2 1' 39 s•I
59
1j
3a s7 sa
go
7A Ioo ,
16,565 SW 108th Ave.
Tigard, OR 9722A
November 19, 1936
CiLy of Tigard
F.C. Do:, 2-797
Tigard, OR 972:
Re: November 24, 1906 Public Hearing
Amendment of Dover Landing Subdivision
Resolution 06-75
Dear Honorable-- M.AyOr- , City Council and Ladies and
gentleman:
Them seems to be some COI-IfL.45ion as to my position
regarding this amendment. To make the record clear
submit this information.
I agreed to sel I a PO- LA,:,,s C jjy land to Waverly
Construction Co. as he wante.1 to build housing
development. I was very specific that I would not
surrender any road frontage land beyond the 20. 41
foot from the center of the road in which my house
occupies (179. 5' ) as I have several 100 year fir
trees that I did not want damaged or removed. If the
City can guarantee that there will be no root damage
or destruction to these trees I will must certainly
be happy to discuss this issue further.
Sincerely, I
wi'-44"" C-C '.
Mrs. Elton C. Phillips
S.JE"NLP PjJjLjjM
HIU"s
ISMS SW.108
P:7
TIGAM 0it.07224
A6
XPL4 Ad
/6790 JW /08
Tirm4 auvon
/'ibvembe+t /986
T49aAd CA4 COWL04-L Re: Fi)-e /skPI RD 2-86..S 7-Wi,SL4 46
13/25 SW A6,U &Vd', AppLiaank- Kerux"k WAVai re
74wu4OAfiWA
pbw4e be Lr�&mwd and let it be &ae"d 'a Ae nemird +m,
Fobeat 0. and FiesdniCa L. fbcfiuEai,#.t oA above ad&m" WLA to mnem
uuth the mgadt to ame ed wnd oae 04 apPwmt 10'z Lbvea Land&lg
,Subclivc,eion. (R wZztion 8675) to aLZM /O&d Aveme tq be dew'&Pod
Aa a .lowt etaeet AkuK Ad 4ow44 of #lie pwpojed Kend Dove Lmt& a on.
l�
r �i
STANLEY E. SHARP, P. C.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
621 S.W.ALDER,SUITE 510
PORTLAND,OREGON 97205
TELEPHONE(503)224-4415
24 Nov 86
Ms. Elizabeth A. Newton, Senior Planner
City of Tigard, Community Development Department
13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: Your File PD 2-86 , S 7-86 , SL 4-86 , NPO #6; CPA 11 =-86
Our File 59132
Dear Ms. Newton:
The contents of this letter are to be considered as the testi-
mony in the foregoing hearings currently set for 7 :30 p.m. ,
11 /24/86 an 12/2/86 .
This office represents Mrs . Elton Phillips.
Until this date, it was not clear to Mrs. Phillips that she and
her late husband had already dedicated the right-of-way to
Tigard 25 feet from the center line of S.W. 108th as a result of
a decision rendered 11 /21 /84 in their minor land petition MLP 6-
84 and Lot Line Adjustment M 8=-84 .
That being the case, Mrs . Phillips requests that the Dover
Landing Subdivision be amended to allow 108th Avenue to be
developed to local street standards rather than collector street
standards.
Regarding CPA 11-86, Mrs. Phillips opposes the redesignation of
108th Avenue from a local street to a minor collector street.
That proposed redesignation would open the door for subsequent
usage which might well eventually extend beyond the 25-foot
boundary. Should this occur, there would be a taking of Mrs.
Phillips' property in the form of condemnation. Any such taking
would cause extensive damage to the remainder of her property,
for the reasons hereafter discussed. The taking of an addi-
tional 5 feet would cause her to lose all ofthe trees hereafter
described.
My client has a number of very large fir trees, several of which
are approximately 100 years old, which form a corridor parallel
to 108th Avenue. Exhibit "A", attached and incorporated by
reference, shows the position of these trees in relation to the
i
Ms. Elizabeth A. Newton, Senior Planner
City of Tigard, Community Development Dept.
24 Nov 86
Page Two
old 20.41-foot boundary, the current 25-foot boundary, and the
30�foQt boundary, should the street become a collector street.
The existence of these trees is precarious, and their root
structures are vulnerable to damage which would be caused by the
installation i�)f utilities in the right-of=way or any other
activities which would disturb their root structures.
The destruction of the trees would cause significant economic
harm to Mrs. Phillips. The value of the remainder of her prop-
erty would be substantially diminished in addition to the loss
of the square footage involved in any taking. The destruction
of these trees would denude her property, totally changing its
character and appearance. Her property currently esthetically
provides a sense of ruralness and seclusion.
Kindest regards ,
STANLEY E. SHARP
SES:jb
Enclosure(s)
cc: Mrs. Elton Phillips (w/encls. )
phillips.n24
IT `l► �Ree� f �ecia/� ' 4/tucV• t" t 3 3'' e6 �
�r
f,g pec f' I�v /ac.)J d f in F,'�y h7' :. '�w •r�,S
a
44 eel S ''Oto r%em; cuNciat,� jb� SIN
3I 4
4
ine w h:.1.t N•It xj i`7
yy l
41
3
31
6 "f'R ta¢. '�6 �,� � ` T+`Co•�n rM1 e w �'1 C.r�i C s�it cel :tJ�" 4�iJ}-
J
i
- 1 O �-}-"Rt4 d �.%L � �tv� inf,►w Diu v r v{it 1�n �P s��a
5 !
c frlE 1+`=/o
'
N ANDERSON & DITTMAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
TIGARD PROFESSIONAL CENTER
8865 ILW. CENTER STREET
P.0.BOX 29006.TIGARD. OREGON 97223
T[LCPNONE .6031 699.1121
DERRYCK H.DITTMAN
ROGER r. ANDERSON
November 24, 1986
To: Members of Tigard City Council -
Mayor John Cook
Tom Brian
Carolyn Eadon
Gerald Edwards
Valerie Johnson
Re: Dover Landing Review - PD 2-86
This letter is being submitted on behalf of the applicant with respect to
the matter of the vacation of street right-of-way along property owned by
Jeanne Phillips. The City staff has recommended that the street right-of-
way be 50 feet along this part of the street known as Southwest 108th, and
the applicant Ken Waymire, Waverly Construction Company, agrees with the
staff recommendation of 50 feet.
This street width of 25 feet from the centerline for right-of-way would
preserve most of the trees along the property now and which will continue
to be owned by Jeanne Phillips. As a matter of fact, in November of 1984,
the Director of Planning and Development, William A. Monihan, approved a
lot line adjustment and minor land partition application requested by
Elton and Jeanne Phillips with respect to this property. One of the
conditions of that approval was the dedication of right-of-way to increase
the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The City failed to
obtain a dedication of all of the right-of-way, but only obtained a dedi-
cation of approximately 50 feet of the right-of-way apparently because of
a mix-up in the maps or at least a mistake in failing to carry out the
Planning Director's decision with respect to the right-of-way dedication
required as a condition of the lot line adjustment and minor land
partition. A copy of that decision is attached hereto.
Members of Tigard City Council
Page Two
November 24, 1986
The lot line adjustment and minor land rarLition were completed, but the
dedication of the right-of-way was not completed.
Therefore, in addition to approving a dedicated right-of-way of 50 feet,
25 feet from the centerline on each side, the applicant requests that
the City Council direct the City staff to require that Mrs. Phillips
complete the dedication of the street right-of-way that was required by
the minor land partition MLP 6-84 and lot line adjustment M8-84 so that
the plat of this development can be recorded immediately.
Very truly yours,
ANDER N & TTMAN
Roger F. Anderson
Enclosure
RFA:PP
cc: Kenneth Waymire
City Attorney
„►-
r 6 •. i
j CITY OF TIGARD t
NOTICE OF DECISION i
'. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 6-64
MINOR LANG PARTITION MLP 6-84
i
R oast b Elton and laanna Phillip to adjust two parcels of
APPLICATION: y parcels of 2.27 and 2.25 acres and to divide the `
1.61 and 2.91 acres into two pa
2.27 acre parcel into two lots of 1.07 and 0.85 acres ar�dRaZ15�Rasidantia<lf�_
parcel for common access. The prop-arty is zoned
units/acre)
MW located at 16565 SY! 108th Avenue, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map !
291 15A, Tax Lot 1100 and 1102).
y Of
ECS,: Notice is tmam^aby given tMt the Plannicngatians c subject to ceor for the rtain
notice
Tigard has APPROVED the above describeda►PP
conditions.' The findings and conclusions on which theDirector basad his
decision are as noted below.
{x:
!1. FIM MO OF FACT
1. gackg round
The property has recently been annexed to the City (ZCA 11-445)
2, Vicinity Information
The property is surrounded by parcels of comparable�i�tl''y��
Soundary but
within _tM Cil utysisd ctiUrban Growth
W"hington ts
!. Site Information and Proposal Description
Tie 2.01 acre parcel contains one use and the
ion of the property 2.27 is within the
M
River.
is undeveloped. The western $actI%* central
y loo year flood plain of the Tualatin sitive lands area. This
the property is within • sen
ravine that is a
T designation is due to the presence of s steep
sipnifim:mrmt wtlemd arced wildlife area.
s to enlw” the 2.27 acre parcel by 0."
7M applicant R is of 1.07. 0.00
awemr�aa and than divide this tract intois taedad to be utilized as
mead 0.l4.be the smallest pare
a m access for the two hsmnesitas from tooth Avenue.
. ftency and Wo Comments
TM ineering Division has the following comments:
a. Mich of the P1 is within a sensitive lands area was
Plan because of tM
identified in the City comprehensive
r=
Presence of a flood plain and steep slopes.
M4TICE OF mM - h t-s4 L ill.* "4 - PANE 1
;�' x
b. The lower portion of the ravine (below 128 foot elevation)
is within the 100 year floodplain and should be dedicated to
the public as greenway.
C. The remainder of the ravine between 128 and 140 feet in
elevation should be shown in relationship to the proposed
property lines.
d. A Sensitive Lands permit will be required for any
development proposed below the 140 foot contour lines.
@. Sanitary sewer easements need to be recorded for each parcel
which does not have direct access to the proposed public
sewer line to be installed near the bottom of the ravine.
f. As proposed with the separate 50 foot wide access parcels,
the application should be considered as a major
partitioning. Also, this parcel should be combined in some
manner with one or more of the three parcels to clarify the
ownership status of the access road. Arrangements for
easements will vary depending upon the ownership of the
roadway.
g. 108th Avenue is classified as a local street. City
standards call for a right-of-way width of 25 feet from
centerline. it appears that additional right-of-way should
be dedicated to meet this standard.
The Building Inspection Office, Washington County Land Use and
Transportation Department, and NPO 6 6 have no objection to the
request.
The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has not submitted
comments.
B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the R-2 zone. The
existing house will meet the setback standards and all of the resulting
lots will exceed the minimum lot size required of 20,000 square feet.
Preliminary information indicates that the two undeveloped parcels will
have homesite locations outside of the sensitive lands area.
The partition portion of this application should be modified to
eliminate the separate 50 foot wide access parcel. This area should be
incorporated as part of the other parcels with the appropriate easements
provided for any lots that do not include ownership up to 108th Avenue.
NOTICE OF DECISION - M 8-84 i MLP 6-84 - PAGE 2
FbeF
nally the applicant should be aware that a Sensitive Lands Permit wil1
necessary prior to construction activity, including the proposed
sewer line, below the 140 foot elevation.
C. DECISION
The Planning Director APPROVES M 6--84 and MLP 6-84 subject to the
following conditions:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO FINAL
APPROVAL OF THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AND PARTITIONING.
2. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the
SW tooth Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet
from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be
tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by
Washington County (Co. Rd. 6 1366). The dedication document shall
be on City forms and approved by the Engineering
DEDICATIONS FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED.
3. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and
recorded on City standards forms for all cowman driveways. Said
agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all
applicable parcel deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the
Engineering Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS
ARE ENCLOSED.
4' The
modifications eadjustment information
shall accompany the
al AWotlindocuments for Planning
Director approval:
a. Verification showing that the two undeveloped parcels will
include a building site outside of the sensitive land* area
as defined by the City.
b• The 50 foot wide access parcel shall be eliminated and
incorporated as part of one or more of the three parcels.
S. The area within the 100 year floodplain shall be dedicated to the
public on City forms (enclosed).
6. Copies of the recorded lot line adjustment and partitioning shall
be submitted to the Planning Depal nt within 15 days of
recording.
T. A City approved non-remonstrance agrawat against future street
imwprovemmwnts shall be signed by the applicant. The form shall be
available from the Engineering Division.
S. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final
decision date noted below.
NOTICE OF DECISION -- M S-S! t MILP 6-94 - PAN3
PROCEDURE
1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper. posted at City
Nall and mailed to:
The applicant ` owners
Owners of record within the required distance
The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL
IS FILED.
3. Agp2al:
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
= with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be
filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given
and sent.
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M.
4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of
Tigard Planning Department. Tigard City Hall, 127SS SW
Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171.
M aA A. Moew.han,
�ofPl�.nlnq�j6 e
Director Dvelopment DATE APPROVED
(KSL:daj/OSW)
s
#XM(E (W oa== - 14 "-1 P" 6-64 - Pfm 4
r
.�_ SCAL 200'x'-' 10
S6 MAP 2S 1 1000
Selo-sa'w •
C R {re O
sef 1500 1 100 se los
t 1600 t.*JAe � S."Ac1. 1
25 A 26 12 3-74 36
(S432)
1501
?#Ac.
ees•i o
343.2 487.04,
i� Sar.-oa Ian ass.as 200 8 337.06
3 �Ji3e MAc
1401 -
1300 xso
tstAc AZOAC
W 201
%! > A.!d At.
202 sso
bL0 2 It AA.
' 4 ski A:, 300
S-09 Ae
w .3 - R
.4 se
- - - -- - -- !: 20 w 34
f 10070 ♦ �, s
23aw78
t
as i101 - -
100
##Ae. Lts:aa 400
2� /.&AR 29 1102 no -� 33 ,.
!+
�• 777���JJJ t.SSO.us941 � 401 aso•
aoo.ei
« -
Soo.u
.r•ar
w
I. 0 Ac. ,; l Akb
CITY OF TLGA RD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 24 1986 AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE SUBMITTED: November 14, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Passed Resolution
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Englewood No. Calling For Public Hearing On 11/24/86
3 Subdivision (Lot 201) PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson _�
Utility Easement Vacation Hearing REQUESTED BY: Mr. Ron Rovse
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
Council initiated Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as
adopted by Resolution No. 85--30.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On October 13, 1986, Council passed Resolution No. 86-119 to call for a public
hearing on Council-initiated request to be held at 7:00 PM on 11/24/86. Staff
requested a Council-initiated vacation to vacate the 5' side-lot utility
easement on Lot 201 of Englewood No. 3 Subdivision (SW 115th Avenue).
No objections were filed by utility companies. The Engineering Division has
recommended approval. The Planning Commission will review said vacation at
their November 18, 1986 meeting; their recommendation will be forwarded to the
City Council prior to the November 24, 1986 public hearing.
The hearing was published in the Tigard Times according to City and State
requirements and all abutting and affected property owners have been notified
by mail. All fees will be paid by Mr. Ron Royse prior to recording of the
ordinance.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve vacation request as shown.
2. Approve vacation request with amendments.
3. Request staff to prepare resolution denying proposed vacation based on
objections and remonstrances received during the public hearing.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Staff recommends alternate #1. Motion to approve ordinance as presented.
e
i
E
{
{
t{{
I.
z
{
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: November 10, 1986
TO; Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy Clarno, Engineering ineering Services Manager
SUBJECT: Englewood d o. 3 Subdivision
1) Public Utility Easement
(Southof Lot
The Engineering Division recommends the vacation
nwiown as "En lewood
No. 3 - South five feet of Lot 201" be app
roved This recommendation is based on the following findings:
(A) There is no affect on traffic, pedestrian or
bicycle circulation. No response was received
from fire nse time
artmentrhadtnoeto concernsorelative todaccesspice
or
Department
response time.
(B) Drainage in the area can be adequately provided for
without use of public easements in the vacation area;
(C) Responses were received from utility companies, and
all supported vacation of the purposed area.
The proposed vacation is not contrary to the Transport-
(D)
ation element of the Comprehensive Plan; and
(E) The vacation is not contrary to the Capital Improvements
Plan.
Reviewed and Approved:
t
william-A. Monahan
Director_ - -
Y Conuctunity Development DepartInen
,r.
MEMORANDUM "---
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
November 24, 1986
TO: City Council
FROM: Keith Liden, Senior Planner t"
SUBJECT: Side—Yard Easement Vacation, Lot 201 — Englewood No. 3
On November 18, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal to vacate
oted unanimously to forward a favorable
the above easement. The Commission v
recommendation to Council.
KL:cw/4377A
8
r t
?Fe
b4
ty�
tTvj
V :.
I
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 24 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 10, 1986
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 7-86/ PREVIOUS ACTION: City Council approval
ZC 15-86 Georgia Pacific
PREPARED BY: Keith Liden
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On November 3, 1986, the Council approved the above application and instructed
staff to prepare an ordinance.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the ordinance.
2. Approve the ordinance with modifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Review and adopt as appropriate.
KSL:bs/212
r w
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: f1-Z _ DATE SUBMITTED: —
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Parking and PREVIOUS ACTION:
Loading Zone Ordinances- S.W. 87th
Avenue PREPARED BY: Sohn Ha man
DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: Comm Dev. Dep .
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
1. The two proposed Ordinances need to be enacted (if the Council so chooses)
together; they work hand-in-hand to effect a result.
2. The object being to eliminate an existing fifteen minute parking zone at
the Center Street end of S.W. 87th Avenue, replacing it with a loading zone.
^aid fifteen minute ,parking zone is currently being improperly utilized as a
loading zone while the existing loading zone which is situated at the Pacific
Highway end of S.W. 87th Avenue, is not of general use to the preponderance of
local business's because of its location.
3. Subsequently, if the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the
public and local business's, to renovate the situation, then it is recommended
that both Ordinances be enacted. Staff suggests that such be done.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
PASS TWO RELATED ORDINANCES, EACH BEING SEPARATELY TITLED, TO WIT:
1. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY
DELETING SUB-SECTION 10.28.110(c), RELATING TO A DESIGNATED FIFTEEN MINUTE
PARKING LIMIT ZONE ON A PORTION OF S.W. 87TH AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
2. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.28.137(2) RELATING TO A DESIGNATED
LOADING ZONE ON S.W. 87th AVENUE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
_' mj/45
x,
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Mayor, City Counc and dmini ati n November 12, 1986
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Parking and Loading Zone Ordinance -- SW 87th Avenue
The Police Department has reviewed the proposed ordinance and inspected the
site. The Department agrees with the proposed ordinance. We are requesting
comes effective that a street
that at the time the ordinance bemounted rubber
stop sign be placed on 87th Avenue.
DL:bs218
_1
Y
M
�r
4
r
- vim, ,� _,��.�� . .�. � •'"�. `'
To: Cha+rf Lehr
From Officer Feacherston
Sir: Regarding the City of Tigard Council agenda item; Parking and
Loading Zone Ordinances - S.W. 87th Ave. The curb on the East side of 87th
38 feet South from S.W. Center is currently painted yellow. At the end of the
yellow is a sign which reads No Parking, Loading Zone, 10:00AM to 4:OOPM.
This sign has been in that location for years and in fact this agency has
been writing citations for cars parking in that location durring those years.
The trucks have been using that location for a loading zone for some time and
it has not caused any traffic problem. The only other sign on that side of S.W.
87th is a Loading Zone sign back near Pacific Hwy. whick is rarely used for
a Loading Zone. I would agree with the proposed ordinance change with the
one exception that the city place a street mounted rubber stop sign on the
pavement on 87th at center. This would mark the stop so that when trucks are
loading, if they block the curb mounted stop sign, traffic Northbound on 87th
at S.W. Center would still know that this is a stop street.
Respectfully Submitted
John C. Featherston
x .
AGENDA ITEM 9.1
CITY COUNCIL 11/24/86
PACKETS
THERE ARE NO MONTHLY UEPAR101ENTAL REPORTS AVAILABLE
FOR THE PACKETS AT THIS fiIME.
11/17/86
cw
x
s -
I
`.7
S
-
�+s�
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 24, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 10, 1986
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 8-86/ PREVIOUS ACTION: City Council denial
ZC16-86 Nordling Scott Martin
PREPARED BY: Keith Liden
DEPT HEAD OKE_ ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
On November 3, 1986, the Council denied the above request and instructed staff
to prepare a resolution.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the resolution for denial.
2. Approve the resolution for denial with modifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Review and adopt as appropriate.
�, � KSL:bs212
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
`_ AGENDA OF: November 24 '1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 10A 1986
�� ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 9-86/ PREVIOUS ACTION: City Council denial
ZC17-86 First Federal Savings
PREPARED BY: Keith Liden
DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
09 November 3, 1986, the Council denied the above application and instructed
stk.ef to prepare a resolution.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the resolution for denial.
2. Approve the resolution for denial with modifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
SUGGESTED ACTION
Review and adopt as appropriate.
' KSL:bs212
n„ff w
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: November 24, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 14, 1986
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Education PREVIOUS ACTION:
Training Request — Operations
Wastewater Crew PREPARED BY: _,William A. Monahan
DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY:
POLICY ISSUE
Should the City send two employees of the Operations Wastewater crew to a
training session on the operation of pumps?
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Two Wastewater crew members require training in the operation of pumps, a
skill necessary in their job. The cost to train each is $$170.00. The
employees will travel to the training site together in a City vehicle.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve the training request.
2. Deny the training request.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for the training session is $170.00 per employee and is covered in the
FY 1986/87 budget.
SUGGESTED ACTION
The staff recommends that the Council approve the training of the two
Wastewater crew members.
/br191
i
rx 0JY T1r7—A /N.
aN• 1';.:A'.Ptiwt> h:1.Q0E5•'
{�
4 T�JS EOrC1 ... _ .er Li.. _:1 lk i Lt•
f S of ei flit.[ r.r a111lilt; O+ c. i .,. .at .C:,.. ._.,G.3..._•1.t.atrl tt:i d... .>_t , �t� ..,+5 .>
t t<.
be attaheu' t =_h la 1orug
} . �:u.:',i'. : .. ..±). 1=1r', i-;...1•, ,.. .. .t.'a:N.i '�
ow up teport 14 re-jo1cu,,,. _Y W1 ,I ac k-6 j;. , j>t::. .,ti'f'. i Tilt'..
D OF REQIIhS1 : 11/13/86 t'•r',;.,• .,.t "i Bob McGoni-&-le
ve r No.
P! ABLE TO. Linn-Benton Communis College ( X� t,a; loyut , r, 't. t?L,��y�n� nDo�1 Fu,
i
ars as se»ccs_. sssa zi.:;:�x csac arx.«_...-_-:a..._:. .a::. .:...,:..:,e..nz..�, _a •._s. :. 's -_.: a
Vii► a
of Program: —tum 11-4 P4mpin8
uitutian or E>rg:lni:zat ion p ann- reu x sus.. Av zOA=0tA7 _ iR1 $ .Linn-Benton)
At isstration ltea.iline 12J21Bb_ 1'rrxiniclp I;�,c, 1 . 1. X.2_/2/$6__�a; .1314/ 6__
De tribe the rmjrpe:se;
s9
k<
Isitli8 related to Ce.,r'r11' !>c,aition ( 1 1ta;ottahir uu,trt :..,3 •,r t ;•ti to—,
F.x
la Ln:
!
WING COSTS: i j to be adv.jnceci to Y1r :r,l s!•u. ;; .fr + •: ;. _;•nd.1 r. .
Re tration or tuicion... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-2120-625:00 $125.00
:... ..... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
2 (mileage, bus, trate-a, airplane, etc. ) . . .ILWAO .
:ins...... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I . . . . . . . . . .
Pe. ,iiia... .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . .. . . . . . . . 10-2120-624:00 W.-db
Ot IV;
ucal S $170.00
r� rsta.�sfa.as®sisaaa�cx area saasmnaa syswan sassssssso-r-s.ax.-_.a.ess maces:-_a:.m.. c sa r:s a-ass:ar rs�as-ter:
{ ixetions: i(employee), understand ana agree that Lt all ccrlclitio:rs t7t
t /training policies are not met, I may Pe required to rem*urae the
4 tor,any expendit r ulade on my behalf.
Signature j� � �� _ ...__..___ Late 11/13/86
Fi vy,
iatidk lance: 4345.00 Manager j J approved ; disas
{),plr it L'J:':�
t ad.'V Y� ( irlrl,rovtd disapproved (explain) :
1
�•- "t __rirsancw• ?:etc:�.Ctrr. :
„ 1
f
Pumps
!About This Cour se:
This course Is desil;nsd for all per-
sonnel
ser
• BhlOMI'�4"7 �
sonnei who come �n cartnct with
centrifugal pumps: owners,
��, yf.cl•
operators, maintenance perst nnet
and$Wes people. The worxshop Is i_ _.1
-� � � �
based on s cific pertotr}ancs Ob- ---
g' jectives which are ayslumed by _ .,aw....
pr
e•sierid p031 40316.F he credits are
` b"e4 on corn;)IetOf V sat- +
w tem,qW aftend rv.ie.The:, tr-tshon
Will lipft*ow a !.'W f sok, o hist
becomes part of the
materials.
December 2, 3, 4. 1986 �1EKi�
When: (Regis. begins at 3:34 a.m.) !I
Tuesday f
Pump Theory ;
Where Linn-Benton Comm. College: Pump Types s
65U0 SW Pacific Eilvd. Pump Nomenclr,r~'A
I Albany, OR 97321 Roller t3esrin�s
College Center 8uPaing Wednesday { I
AisealCalapooia Room t;ornoonen:Fiepov-e-mrt
Packing Installation
mocnantem Semis
$125,00 per person Pump Piping Sym'ems
4..0sti Pump Hydraures
(includes text v beverage)
Pvday
ump Hydraulics
C�pmrating contHtksna 11
Credits. 2 Credits Unes anon t
Special Pumpin�Jnivl
Evoluatlop
skeet Arasmith
Instructor: QRr
NC A HAND*
Mr.Aresmith has tied over 15 years experience
In waterworks operattons and instruction in �LL{�T®R
wlrletr of.gQuraes,This course was _.
develloped by
'Mr.Arasmith over a pentad of
six years and has been delivered by him to
r over 800 participants. Mr. Arasmith is the e
fl author of the text "Pumps and Pumping”
t mound which this course Is built.
t 1,
OIo�IPLETION 5.00 p.m. ------, ,
in
-R�r
SO
•a,AO !RueQttl -UM HO "SullqLId'
tf3l�d 'PAts ol.;toa; MS 0059
-'vamasod 's*n afiatlo0 -(IWU1"U:) uoluag-uu"
t 0 lS3O2id-NON SNINI"I 1y1N3wNO2iIAN3 2{031131N33 338MYS31d NMMO
l ! knWM
bnpeMe►+pit
,
• AWW*-
y ;
�wwsrrwwwwwwwwwwrw�ewww�swwawwwwww.nirw�pw+��wwrrwiwrwar�rr
f; SEND REGISTRATION TC:
Oregon Resource Center for Environmental traininq
Linn-Benton Coaur'ity .allege ahor4�. i5j aj92s-s�`lC'
6500 Sw Pacific Blvd.
Albany, OR 57:321
1 I wish to register for the workshop en>r�ticci:
i! P i'S & Pwt+pi ng - Hel� at L i rn-Bentori Communi-Ly Co i lege
December 2, 3, 4, 1980 - Cost $125.00
` State — --
Phone
h .4 yeI
r 1 •A
' CITE' T14FA RD
f
s^ �
form is to be used tui c.,ntezeneers ti,,minarb, c.�ilr=:� c , , to and L�Li;.:r
of either traini;rg ,.)r education.
i<;cuzn,•r,c at;.,n z� z e( r t. : z . s copy i::
�.
Ce attached to this i,srt.. 1,_.achmetzt_> s,t: .,.,. ,,_, may
4.. .Orr iiQ ;@ .'Art is rr?,;u 1 r•' : ,;,>•i w t. i ,,:• :.it yi r
D E OF REQUESI'-_jjkjj4 _ _ r. +" L° s'. Suzette Garon
V or No. :
P A$1.( TU: _ Linn-BentoR__CoM t� Y-�4 l@ge xx ;
ss_00W
Allo._4&_gj3U.__ ,
t a,: h+ n {
r '
Ve or NO. : .,ettt jr No.
F 1.E To
• I':i`!a5L!S FC1•
Ai a.Ca➢RaGaaa>a si»3ia1la,=„4..:.5�-.:.-,,;,»:si�S:G�3e�a3.<a-_ :�Ce;: --.< .-... -s .... sL:: cs.:a x as 2:: c:e.1c-° '.:v
t of
Program: tp$ p._
titutionorur anzan Ore&o�n.$
ResourceCenter for�Environmental
Training _(Linn-Benton)
'straton ;1ea<line12/2/86 tr.,irzi::, ii ;tes Frau 12%2/86 : 12 4/86
De vibe the purpose:
Thh s course will cover pump theory and types of pumps. Will teach how to operate &
ma tain & some repair. Since we have 2 pump stations in our system, I feel this course
w l be beneficial.
Is his related tta 1 ,� ; c:,trrent pt.>a&t lost
Est ,aln: he do daily checks of our Sewage Pumping Stations and are responsible for thdir
b�4ug maintained properly. Also have to be able to do trouble shooting or repairing if
t y are not running correctly.
I!!G COSTS; It j to be. advacced
Nc
tration or tuition.,F. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-2120-625:0012500
•................. ... . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . .
Tor 1 (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc. )... .
ng.......... ....... .. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P#t . ....: . . —f6=2I'fdU;SZiIIO' _`7+"S:Uff'
lea....., ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tota!
ittr4 most .......... a.awa_mxaa.e aeuaa.asaasra
. cations: Iteaiployee) , understand and al:tie tEtaz it ill ^nnt3iL x+ f
tion/training policies are not met, 1 may be rr,l,.z t re l to crirrbuiv e,
e,
1; - for any ®xpend ure made on my behalf.
ee Si$r�at�re: _ , 'late it 13,(86_-
,
Api
priation ance. 1q. Manager je_ i ( diSapprLsvNd
ipr Head. ( appiUVed sapproved Sex}slain) .
.K
t
t� .
ti
i
Pumps
3 i
tPumping
About This Coutse: y _;
This course is de3i nsd for all per. �_�, � ' ��,.,,,� -•.
sonnet who corns m rantart with 4 :.
centrifugal pumps: owners,
operators, maintenance personnel ,! _v
and sates people. The workshop is —w _i:. � ) _.-:-_A
basad on specific poirfomiance oh•
lectives which are evaluated by
pre-and pas!-tests. +he crew=ts are
baser on ccmclet:ro Of ts--e pa3t-
tps3, ddat�rtr3�-:`�e. i7ze xcr�ts?ro� j
will w1ow a a38 rsa9f, #owl that
becorne3 part of tht., ldnt a i ; 1
materials;.
When: Qec+ember 2, 3, 4, 1986 tie% #
(Regis. begin3 at 8:30 a.m.) 1
TZ*y t
Linn-Benton Comm. College, Kme ry;«'.
Where: 13300 SW Packle Blvd. Punw Nomen0st"ttt
Albany,OR 97321 fit"®°arini s I
College Center Building Wednesday r
AlsealCalapoola Room C3ornumnent Fmpsa^.e:o<r ,,
PrCietrep InstatleCon i
Mtaanan"Seals
�.t7►St: $125,00 per person �p Pi��41yste►rns
(includes text beverage)
Thursday
pump""mulfcs
C�pKitittQ
Conollltsms
3 Credits L.ixlc 1
Credits: Unesmft Tart ns~
Special Pumplr+c, JW-1
lb
i EwtuatioN
Instnxtor: Skeet Arasrnith W r
Mr.Aresmith has had over 15 years experience
In waterworks operations and in stnJction in CALCULATOR ,✓'"
__,j_�liojy_of cgur$ae. This course was._ ,,,,y-
developed by Mr.Arasmith over a perk>d of
six years and has been delivered by him to =
over 800 participants. Mr. Aresmith is the 4
author of the text "trumps and Pumping"
around which this course Is built.
� t+.
4OWLErION 5:00 p.m. r f-----=�
e
lix A
s
F SO
i9 p�
�a.ep I KuegIVQItl
� mad
U6 HO 4,fupq LV
a504sod -S'n 'PAIS sf;Ioad AS 0OS9
1130dd-NON JNINIddl ltJ1N3W a6aLL03 �l'}unuuu) U04u8$-uu�l
y
N041AN3 b0J UIN-0 33dflGS3b N003HO
r,
-L.JLPJLJL
Ls
kls j
�,M.ryJf�
'SAlh
!
AWWA,;
arsawwsrwwrrwawor�wr�nwwwaar�eswsirwsr.orwrrrasr�wrr��rrwrwrrn
SEND REO I STRA T IO. �C:
Oregon Resource Center for Environmental Training
f Lin!!-Benton Commurity :..,)liege o +�>;3j9Ef3-:sG1C;
f 6500 SW Pacific 91vd.
Albany, OF 57321
I wish to register for the werl:shep emit;. d:
Pu p'S b Puff i ng - he l at L i nn-Benton Community College
December 2, 3, 4, 1986 - Cost $125.()j
State..._._- Zip
Phone
At
r._; �� '�, -r .3. ....e� a _ .c •"'.._._._ -_ ^_....�� ¢a r .t.+rr-a^hEl.`3�.a Sa;,�