Loading...
City Council Packet - 11/17/1986 6. TIGARD TRIANGLE STUDY REPORT Verbal Report - No Council Action o City Engineer 7, CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be k enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: Jo/Br to approee UA 7.1 Approve Council Minutes: October 13, 1986 7.2 Receive and File: a. Department Reports b. Job Descriptions c. CIP Status Report - October, 1986 7.3 Approve Contingency Resolution - Police Vehicle - Res 86-126 7.4 Approve Deputy City Recorder Appointment - Res. No. 86-127 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 8.1 Local Contract Review Board Meeting bid - Jo/Ed Approve Purchase Of Police Vehicles - Jo/Ed accept than axle and locking legasg all C p) options able(other under limited slip rvar Bid plan. Amended motion passed by unanimous vote. 8.2 Resolution No. 86-128 Executive Service Contract Adoption With Jill Monley as Community Services Director/Assistant City Administration Officer/Acting Finance Officer Br/Ea to approve - passed by 4-1 majority vote of Council.the voting lnnay.of Jfill Monley Jo/Ea move to unanimously serpport j UA `�. 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) (e) 6 (h) to discuss labor relations, current/pending litigation issues, and real property transactions. 10. ADJOURNMENT 11:20 PM lw/4280A PAGE 2 -- COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 17, 1986 t 3# T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986, - 6:30 P.M. 1. BOLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian, Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Randy Wooley, City Engineer; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Acting City Recorder; 2. STUDY SESSION - LIBRARY BOARD a. City Administrator Jean reviewed the proposed revision of the City Organizational Chart. A traditional City Organizational Chart is divided into many departments with each Department Head reporting to the City Administrator. The proposed "programmatic" organizational chart would be reduced to three major departments: 1) Public Safety 2) Community Services 3) Community Development The Library, in the new Chart, would become a division in the Community Services Department. (The Library is now a Department.) b. Library Board Chairman Richard Bendixsen outlined the Board's concerns with this new Chart: o The Library Board has enjoyed a unique relationship with the City in the past. They have been able to negotiate, in some instances, for the overall benefit of the City which otherwise may not have been possible through any other department. o Thirty-nine municipalities were contacted to ascertain what the organizational structure was like for their libraries. Out of twenty-nine responses, twenty-eight indicated that their libraries were a separate organization and not combined with other City functions. o The Library Board feels that the present system of management has worked extremely well to date. The Board has serious reservations about becoming less than a City department. C. There was discussion among the Council, Board and City Administrator concerning the time constraints of the City Administrator. Should the City Administrator be involved in the daily "nuts and bolts" operations of the Library? d. The Board questioned the reasoning of grouping the Library with Finance aid the others of the Community Services Department. NOVEMBER 17, 1986 Page 1 -. COUNCIL MINUTES Y f The City Administrator commented that the divisions in the �r Community Services Department have some basic similarities to the Library. these similarities includa public contact, record keeping, and information management. e. It was the consen3us of the City Council and Library Board members to leave the Organizational Chart status quo for the time being. During the Budget preparation process, this subject will again be considered. f. Head Librarian Ertell updated the Council on several areas including the completion of the computerized catalog/circulation system, WCCLS changes, joint effort by area libraries on the upcoming operati levy issue (June 1987), and tie successful "Access 186" program. g. Boardman Walt Munhall commented on the following: o The City needs to expedite signage around the City Hall. o The City is urged to address additional parking needs. o More lighting is needed around the City Hall property. o Suggested that Department Heads prioritize a list of materials needed. o The interior library lighting is unacceptable. It should be ascertained if the lighting meets the building specifications and does it meet State standards. REGULAR MEETING BEGAN AT 7:00 P.M. i 3. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator reported that there is a hand-carry item concerning Item 8.1, Local Contract Review Board Award of Bid of Police Vehicles. b. City Administrator requested on Item 8.2, Employment Agreement for the Community Services Director Appointment, that the City Council adjourn into Executive Session to discuss changes on the Agreement. After the Executive Session, the Council then would reconvene for whatever action was deemed necessary. 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Mayor Cook read a letter, dated November 16, 1986, from Randy and Nancy Krupp, 15805 S.W. Stratford Loop and Jeff and Judy Davison, 15825 S.W. Stratford Loop. This letter expressed concern about a letter from the City of Tigard Codes Enforcement Officer requesting removal of a basketball hoop pole in City right-of-way. Consensus of Council was to direct the Community Development Director to have his staff look into this matter and report back to Council at a future meeting. 5. ROAD RICHT OF WAY VORI01lS STREETS (Fonner Street/ZCA 12-86; Walnut Street/ZCA 14-86; 121st Avenue/ZCA 13-86) Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986 a. Public Hearing Opened. �. b. Motion by Council Brian, seconded by Council Johnson, to continue the Public Hearing to the December 8, 1986 City Council Meeting. Approved by a unanimous vote of the Council present. 6. 135TH STREET LID REPORT a. City Engineer synopsized the Preliminary Evaluation Report for the 135th Avenue LID. Staff met with the property owners in the area on October 21 and the results of this meeting were k summarized in the Preliminary Evaluation Report. Other issues _ which camp up this meeting included a request for a street light as soon as possible at 135th b Scholls Ferry Road. Staff has f- studied this and are proceeding with it; the State Highway Department must be involved since Scholls Ferry is under their jurisdiction. Also, the street name sign is missing at 135th; the sign hats been ordered and will be put up as soon as it arrives. a b. Included the City Engineer's remarks were the following: o Other improvements are occurring on Scholls Ferry Road that _ will help 135th in 1987: Interim improvements are being done by the State at Scholls Ferry and Old Scholls Ferry Road. including minor realignment at that intersection, signalize that intersection, and provide turn lanes both at the '. Scholls/Old Scholls Intersection and at 135th. City Engineer emphasized that these improvements are separate from the LID; they are already funded and the design is underway and the State is proceeding with those projects. o The proposed improvement will include 135th from Scholls Ferry Road to the current City Limits near Walnut Street. As proposed in the City's agreement with the County, 135th will be realigned slightly to create the new intersection with Murray Boulevard. Also under consideration is building a portion of the Murray Boulevard extension. o 135th Ave. is classified in Tigard's Comprehensive Plan as a major collector, therefore, staff has been proposing to build a 44-foot wide street. A major collector street is usually marked as a three—lane street with two through lanes, a center turn lane and extra width by the curb for bike lanes. As a result of questions raised by the property owners, staff reviewed the the most recent traffic projections and the traffic projections contained in the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. Subsequently, staff concluded there might be some justification for considering downgrading 135th Avenue r •. Page 3 —;COUNCIL MINUTES-- NOVEMBER 17, 1986 to minor collector status. This would mean a Comprehensive Plan change that would have to go through Planning Commission _ and City Council Hearings to be accomplished. This downgrading would not substantially affect the costs of the LID. o Staff is proposing a boundary which would include the undeveloped lands that are served by 135th Avenue and by Murray Boulevard as well as the subdivisions that are served by 135th and by Murray. This is consistent with the City's policy over the last few years of requiring adjoining development to pay the costs of improving the collector and arterial streets abutting the subdivisions. Staff has received a number of suggestions that the LID should be expanded to include other people which may use 135th for their access. This probably could be done; however, this would be a change from our past policy of only including those subdivisions and developments that immediately abut the improvement. o There is some concern about nonremonstrance agreements in the area. Tigard has nonremonstrance agreements on several developments in the area. Approximately 22% of the area within the current proposed boundary is covered by these agreements. o Potential assessment methods have been discussed with the residents were reviewed by the City Engineer. Depending on the method selected, a very rough estimate is that the typical subdivision lots would be paying a total assessment of between $900-1,400. o City Engineer reported that the estimate for the total LID would be $1.7 million. $1.2 million would be 135th Avenue improvements and the remainder would be for the extension of Murray Boulevard. 14-array Soule-mord property owners would be assessed for their improvements separately. o City Engineer outlined a preliminary schedule if the Council directed at this meeting to proceed with the preliminary engineering report stage. Staff would anticipate being ready for public hearing on the LID formation sometime in January which would allow the City to move forward and advertise for construction bids in the late spring and build the project during late summer. C. Staff recommended: o To use the boundary as proposed in the Preliminary Evaluation Report allowing for minor revisions to conform to property ' . lines and to conform with some preliminary plats which are just starting to be processed now. At the public hearing, the size of the LID can be reduced if necessary; thus, if it appeared that the Murray Boulevard extension should be deleted from the LID, this could happen at the public hearing: At =r Pag4' 4 -_COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986 this time staff would recommend that the Murray Boulevard and 135th Avenue improvements go at the same time. This would better accommodate the realignment of 135th into Murray and tf would also provide another access to Scholls Ferry Road from the Walnut Street area. o That Council consider reclassification of 135th and initiate the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process to consider changing 135th to a minor collector status. o That Council allow staff to use traffic generating potential of the lots as basis for assessment. This would be better define as to how it would be calculated during the preliminary engineering report. Right-of-way acquisition costs be assessed on a front footage basis with those properties and subdivisions that have already donated adequate right-of-way not be assessed for the additional right-of-way acquisition. o That staff be directed to request approval from the Board of County Commissioners to include the County land in the LID. A portion of this proposed LID is outside of the City limits, Oregon State Law will allow the City to include that in the LID with the permission of the County. o That staff be directed to proceed to the next step in the LID process which is to prepare the preliminary engineer's report. This report would include estimate assessments for each parcel, a more detailed description of the improvements, more detailed cost estimates, and a detailed boundary of the LID. The City Engineer suggested that the preliminary engineer's report look at an LID both with and without the additional Murray Boulevard work. d. The Council then directed questions to the City Engineer. e. Several citizens were present to talk to the Council. o Robert Joy, 11735 S.W. 134th Terrace, is pleased with the proposed downgrading of the size of 135th Avenue. He said the Murray Road extension is important because it reinforces the idea that 135th will not be a major collector. Mr. Joy questioned the assessing methods proposed for this project. City Administrator cited other projects which were financed similarly. o Russ Krueger, 1335 S.W. 66th Avenue, Portland, Oregon, commented about the Murray extension on the Beaverton side. Reported that he has been talking with the City of Beaverton concerning their study on the Beaverton Murray Extension. Mr. Krueger reported that he believes Beaverton anticipates this k Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER il, 1986 would be constructed next summer; therefore, by next fall, the Tiga^d and Beaverton Murray Boulevard improvements should be done. Mr. Krueger commented that it is time for the improvements to be done on 135th Avenue also and feels the Bancroft method for property owners is the best and fairest way to fund these improvements. o Mr. Ed Forner, 11576 S.W. Sheffield Circle, said that neither he nor the neighbors he had spoken with had received formal notification of this meeting nor concerning the LID. Mr. Forner is concerned about the charges which have already been nd would like to have an accounting paid to date on his home a of that money. He asked why they are looking at an LID when the builders have already paid out monies for the maintenance of 135th Avenue. Mr. Forner is also concerned about street lights needed, the posted speed limited at 40 mph is excessive, and school bus stop$ are not adequately signed. Community Services Director reported that the charges paid ($500 prior to July 1st, $600 after ) by the developer were a Capital Projects street fund amount. There was also a storm drainage surcharge and a surcharge for Parks SDC. City Administrator further clarified that the charge of ions $ is sequestered for Capital Pro ararect e forts to improve lthissproject (if bottlenecks around town ande deemed desirable by the City Council) as well as others. Many can be of Mr. Fornadrssed at the Cit er qif questions and nionconcernss t go ahead public hearing Y Conit makes the decis with the project. _.` o Marilyn Rider, 11768 S.W. Swendon Loop, stated she strongly supports the staff's recommendation to downgrade 135th Avenue to a minor collector street. She stated she pay it fowouldthe be undesirable for the property improvement to be as wide and as inviting as Murray Boulevard. She does not want to encourage 135th's use as a through street, but would like it to be improved so that it is t' a safe access to developments within the LID. is on the on o John Butler, 9760 S.W. O'Mara. Commission isa glad to�seeithe Mr. Butler said the Planningfurther beginning of the improvement of 135th Avenuroved s many new a stated that the Planning Commission has app developments in the area of 135th with the assurance of staff soon that improvements would be forthcoming the LID is successful Mr. Butler concluded by saying possible and is done in the shortest time f. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to accept the staff's recommendations of: 1 That the LID boundary be as shown on Map No. 2 (November 1986 Preliminary Evaluation Report); provided, that minor bovrdary adjustments be made in the preliminary engineer's reprirt as necessary to conform to property lines and proposed plats. page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER OVEMBER 17, 1986 ti'u '.3 - ..vlA4i1 J e .", �r brr_^.. .,.. ;. ..,..� ,� .. x,.: :,.. ;-- ;••r ;a - 1S#atl:3m'Sf„{{ytx. c.,�s r'+S f 2. That the Council consider reclassification of 135th (between Murray and Schools Ferry) and hereby initiate the process for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to consider revising the designation of SW 135th Avenue on the Transportation Map. 3. That assessments be based on the traffic generation potential of each parcel for all costs except right-of-way acquisition and that the preliminary engineer's report define the method . for calculating the assessments. s ac uisitions costs be assessed on a 4. That right-of-way q have already front-footage t�f ansa and bethat exclud d ies oper from which the front-footage } donated right-of-way assessment. 5. That the Board of County Commissioners be requested to approve inclusion of property outside Tigard City limits. 6. That a preliminary engineer's report be prepared based on the i above arecommendations c yr h t iconstruction of that eMurrrayt Boulevard anconsider LID of both with 135th Avenue. g, Council Discussion on the Motion: o Councilor Johnson suggested that a larger boundary for the Murray Boulevard portion of the proposal be studied and F prepared for Council review. She was concerned that benefits may very well be realized in a greater area t-n what �t currently proposed. is o Councilor Eadon stated that having the option of committing SDC funds to this project would help defray some of the cost and could be an alternative to expanding the boundary of the LID. o Councilor Brian commented that the questions and concerns he th heard were directed rt not so much spreading the cost M ray Murray Avenue cost of Murray improvements, but excluding the from those who would be paying on 135th Avenue. o There was discussion on the Fern 7-idge area wherein they will be asked to participate as they are within the zone of benefit. Councilor Brian noted that the City has included properties, in the past, which do not front on an improved street but definitely benefit by it. The disadvantage would be that if Fern Ridge is included in this LID, then they cannot be inc?!ided in the extension on the south end of Walnut. h, Mayor Cook call ad for a vote on the motion. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 3 Page 7.-.'COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 17, 1986 a "� i. Councilor Johnson requested that staff report on the Beaverton portion of Murray Boulevard as soon as that information is available. 7. PUBLIC HEARING - ALBiERTSON'S - CPA 6-86 and ZC 10-86 (NPO No. 6) Request by James & Emma Jean White; Herbert & Betty Dayson; H. C. and Amy Randall; Gary & Nadine Randall; Donald & JoAnn Randall; Health Resources, Inc.,; and William Brownson (ALBERTSON'S) for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low, Medium High & High Density Residential to Commercial General and a ZONE CHANGE from R-4- (Residential 40 units/acre), R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) and R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre) to C-G (Commercial General) on property located south of Durham Road, east of Pacific Hwy. and west of 113th Avenue. (WCTM 2S1 15BA, lots 100, 200, 300, 400; & 2S1 15A, lots , i 2800, 2802, 2900, 3000, 3001, & 3002. (Continuation of Public Hearing from November 3, 1986) a. Public Hearing Opened. b. Councilor Eadon declared a conflict of interest concerning this agenda item and, therefore, will be abstaining from the discussion and the vote on the issue. C. Councilor Brian declared that he has had a large number of people contact him by telephone and in person regarding the land use proposal. These contacts are split just about evenly before and against the zone change. People have expressed concerns about _ traffic and their preferences of one type of traffic over another, preservation of trees, the need and/or the no need for this type of development. The general information was basically opinion and he still has an open mind on considering the facts of { hearing and arrived at no conclusions. d. Community Development Director assessed the history of this agenda item overall. Two memorandums were sent to Council on this issue and included in their packets. In the memorandum dated November 7, 1986, staff addressed the housing density issues and what Council's options will be. If Council decides to make the Comprehensive Plan change, there are a number of issues concerning how the City could make up the lost housing opportunity throughout the community. This burden of responsibility can either rest with the City, with the applicant, or a combination of both. i ' The Community Development Director advised that in the applicant's proposal, they pointed out that there would be in excess of 600 units of lost housing opportunity. A memorandum, dated November 17, 1986 prepared by the Community Development Director reflects calculations wherein he proposes that anproximately 412 units will need to be made up. The Community Development Director then explained how he arrived at this calculation difference. Page 8 COUNCIL MINUTES -..NOVEMBER 17, 1986 3( � 3 ��`.""'xt '* ,' �.`cai.';s�t�"ti..✓.=n+ai... .,>e'�.a"5�.�i.�...s_.:ew'' w,:,A % a �",. xt- Community Development Director advised that there have been two Comprehensive Plan Amendments that totalled an addition of 42 i units with no change in acreage. TEe Council may decide to allow these 42 units to be used as a setoff when considering the need for the additional 412 units. This would mean that the bottom line would state that 370 units will need to be recovered. _ Community Development Director referred to maps to illustrate the actual buildable lane' currently in the City. He also referred to a map included in the Councilors' packets which highlighted those areas which may be nominated to make up the densities should this rezoning take place. If Council so directs, staff is prepared to present a variety of methods for the recovery of the housing opportunity. e. City Engineer reported that he has reviewed the Associated Transportation Engineering & Planning, Inc. (ATEP) traffic analysis. He stated that he would feel comfortable with the t analysis if the property were zoned for the proposed development today and the City was looking at a site development review at this point. The traffic analysis is quite adequate and points out the typos of improvements that would be needed on Durham and Pacific Highway to accommodate the development the applicant has proposed. The City Engineer has received revised pages missing from the earlier traffic study and said he is quite comfortable with the calculations which also resolve questions the County had (OM1 concerning the traffic projection. The NPO questioned the adequacy of the turn lanes on Pacific Highway. This is something that should be reviewed at the time of site development review if we get to that point. The City Engineer noted that this would be quite easy to resolve. The City Engineer commented that the traffic report contains the k data which would be needed for evaluation at the time of site review. The City Engineer advised that the Council may want to = review the impacts of all of those Comprehensive Plan changes on the long—range traffic generation in the area and whether these changes should then be transferred as revisions to the Transportation Map in the Comprehensive Plan. ti f. Public Testimony PMR2nents o John W. Shonkwiler, 5750 S.W. Carman Drive, Lake Oswego OR 97034; was present representing Albertson's and addressed the housing issue. Mr. Shonkwiler explained how they calculated BER 17, 1986 Page 9 COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEM i-..�s ,. �'. �++k L� � nh`-.er,t`: •c.,su�..�sir- N- ,tea.. _ -z�S ..:-r.Sh&�-'�,a- - -." the lost density which was somewhat different than the way City staff had done their figuring. However, Mr. Shonkwiler noted that the final figure was 412 and, if the 42 units added through rezoning since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan are subtracted, then the net units to be added would be 370. Mr. Shonkwiler pointed out areas on a map which he and his staff felt would be good candidates for planning change to accommodate higher densities. Mr. Shonkwiler recommended City Council approval for this project conditioned upon the 370 units being made up. He suggested that City staff could be directed to start the legislative process to accommodate the transferring of density through rezoning. He also requested that City Council grant conditional approval to allow Albertson's to go forward with the site development review so that they do not lose time in the process. Mr. Shonkwiler noted that in their Traffic Engineer's study, that an additional 463 units could be added on Durham Road. Therefore, there is still is capacity left even after Albertson's change to commercial. o Richard Woelk, 16016 S.W. Boones Ferry, Lake Oswego, OR 97034, Traffic Engineer for Albertson's also testified. Mr. Woelk explained this Albertson's'project will be adding 177,000 square feet of commercial space which then will produce an increase of 6,500 cars per day (24-hour period). Mr. Woelk summarized the traffic conditions which now exist and then explained how the additional traffic generated by 'A this project would impact the area. Substantial traffic ,§ improvements are needed on Durham Road as well as modifications to the access to the Summerfield at some point past the Summerfield development. A traffic signal will be needed at the Summerfield intersection and in order to accommodate a traffic signal, revisions will be necessary to the Summerfield access, i.e. , multiple lanes out by removing the concrete island. t Mr. Woelk reviewed some of the options presented in his report detailing how the increased traffic could be handled. He also noted that major improvements would be needed downtown before a development such as this could be placed there. c In response to a question posed by Councilor Brian, Mr. Woelk reported if high-density residential (for which it is presently zoned) were placed on this site the amount of traffic would be virtually the same as would be created by this commercial development. However, the peak hours of usage would be different. Mr. Woelk also pointed out that if this i, parcel were to be developed as residential, there could be up to five additional driveways on Durham Road as opposed to the ,f one location for the commercial proposal. Page 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986 r • 3 C o Don Duncombe, Real Estate Manager, Albertson's, Inc., 10230 S.W. Hall Boulevard reiterated if Albertson's is granted the right, through zone change, to develop the property they would pay for all of the improvements thereby making the traffic situation better than it is now. Mr. Duncombe said Albertson's is committed to make this a showplace for Tigard. He believes this development could capture a large share of the $9-12 million of dollars per year leaving this area. o Gary Thornton, (engineer), 4806 N.E. 26th, Vancouver, Washington said he was hired by the Willowbrook people to view the traffic study for this site. He has found no problem with the traffic study and it will work for Willowbrook. o Steve Ward, Westech Engineering, 7000 S.W. Varns, Tigard, Oregon. Mr. Ward is the civil engineer on the project and advised he was at the meeting to answer questions concerning the site development access. o Jane Tye, 15650 S.W. 0ld Orchard Road, Tigard, Oregon, signed in as a proponent, but wish to address the Council on concerns she has regarding the development. Ms. Tye asked that the Council take care to see that the developer follows through with what has been promised if this proposal is approv:id. She is concerned about the change proposed for the entrance of Summerfield and wants to be assured that it will be done properly. Opponents o Phil Pasteris, NPO #6, expressed concern over the traffic study and what he perceived as lack of projections for future traffic impacts on Highway 99. o J.B. Bishop, 3604 S.E. Oak Street, Portland, Oregon 97214, is a commercial property owner in the Tigard area. Mr. Bishop addressed several concerns incluaing the lost density issue, future build—out of the area as it relates to the transportation study and off—site traffic impacts. Mr. Bishop contended that the downtown area could handle this proposed commercial development. He cited the recent LID improvements off Main Street which would facilitate commercial growth of this type. He concluded his remarks by saying the Council should heed the Comprehensive Plan, growth management policies and economic policies which are now in place. g. Community Development Director recommended that the City Council first make a determination whether or not the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is justified in accordance with the criteria within the Comprehensive Plan. From the presentation given on November 3, 3. Page:9r1' COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 17, 1986 the Community Development en al °r' If the City Councilldetermines ll adhered to the recommendation for that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is justified, then housing density issues must be addressed. h. Councilor Johnson asked the o hetheEngineer or not it addressed future comfortable with the traffic study neer responded that traffic projections adequately. The City Engineer he was satisfied with the traffic report. i, Public Hearing was closed. j , Mayor Cook said the fi admen em`CPA)issjustified hNtThererfollowed Comprehensive Plan Ame considerable discussion on this point. o Councilor Edwards said he had no objections to the proposed CPA as long as the criteria is followed. o Councilor Brian said he supports the proposal. One of his key concerns was that if the land is changed to commercial usage, then it should not add to to traffic that otherwise would have been experienced with the property as currently zoned for z study indicates that high-density residential. The traffic F the increase in traffic will be negligible. Councilor Brian noted his desire to ascertain if the density transfer is feasible. o Councilor Johnson basically agreed with Councilor Brian. She (r commented that time would be needed for each NPO to consider i ` the zone change and report to the Planning Commission. o There was lengthy discussion on the density transfer issue. k At the conclusion of the discussion outlined some lor Brian possible went through the density map changes which may be possible in order to accommodate the lost density if this property is to be rezoned as proposed. k. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to give tentative approval of the Comprehensive Plan tough the t as proposed contingent upon density transfers approved land use application process, with no density re tr nsfers abs abutting Durham Road, and directing staff to prepare noting conditional approval for Council action at a future meeting. The motion was approved by a 4-0--1 vote of the Council present; Councilor Eadon abstained from voting. g, TIGARD TRIANGLE STUDY REPORT a, City Engineer went over the report that was delivered to the City Council. Page 12 COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 17, 1986 o The Tigard Triangle Traffic Report tends to confirm the Comprehensive Plan for the Tigard Triangle area. The zoning and circulation plan currently set for the area can be made to work if certain street improvements are made. The report allows for the City to stage those improvements over the next 20 years. o The report addresses both short—term and long—term planning processes. It is currently being put to work in the Dartmouth Street Project. For the long term, this report will be used in planning and looking ,t future zone changes as well as being utilized as a tool in the preparation of the Public Facilities and Capital Improvement Plans. 9. CONSENT AGENDA *hese items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 9.1 Approve Council Minutes: October 13, 1986 9.2 Receive and File: a. Department Reports b. Job Descriptions c. CIP Status Report — October, 1986 9.3 Approve Contingency Resolution — Police Vehicle — Res. 86-126 9.4 Approves Deputy City Recorder Appointment — Rea. No. 86-127 a. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Brian, to approve. Approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 10:24 p.m. 10. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING was called to order at 10:24 p.m. a. ROLL CALL: Present: Board Chairman John Cook; Board Members: Tom Brian, Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David Lehr, Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Randy Wooley, City Engineer; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Acting City Recorder. b. Motion by Board Member Johnson, seconded by Board Member Edwards to accept the bid as presented in the Chief of Police's Agenda Item Summary dated November 13, 1986. Discussion on the motion followed concerning the options listed in the report. Moved by Board Member Johnson, seconded by Board Member Edwards to amend- the motion on the floor to delete all options (other than limited slip rear axle and locking gas cap) if able to under the State Bid plan. V. _. :Page` 13 COUNCIL MINUTES'- NOVEMBER 17, 1986 i i C t Approved, as amended, by a unanimous vote of Board Members present. ADJOURN CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING 10:34 p.m. COUNCIL RECONVENED 10:34 p.m. 11. Motion by Councilor Brian, secondedte Executiveuncilorn Johnson, to alio:-► Councilor-elect S attend Motion approved by a unanimous vote of the Council present. RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 10:35 p.m. RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: 11:00 p.m. 12. CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTIVE SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT a A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN EXECUTIVE SERVICE EMPLOYMENT TOR ASSSTANT CITY ME ADMINISTRATIVE NT WITH JILL � COFFICERCTING SERVICESOMMUNITY DIRECTOR/ FINANCE OFFICER. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to approve the adoption of Resolution No. 86-128. Motion passed by a 4-1 majority vote of Council present; Councilor Johnson voting nay. C. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Eadon, to unanimously support the appointment of Jill Monley as the Community Services Director. Motion approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 13. AD30URW*NT: 11:20 p.m. f j��4 City Recorder - C ty of Tigard ATTE C of Tigard Council :President cw/4323A Page 14- -'COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1986 �i 3n'.�ay .Y i4K i` k", l' .: �ktl�vy�.• iYu'i�"G�:>c.$+�2.. b.b*..+.x. +niM"w.'.th k W _ _ _ TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY L=-6866 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)8840380 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising REC�i VEO • City of Tigard 0 Tearsheet Notice Novi r X986 • PO Box 23397 p Duplicate Affidavit Cfty Tigard, Or 97223 �f ll(;q�p AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON. COUNTY of wASHOIGTON, )sa. ' . e. I Anng, JAan , 6OW9 first duly sworn.depose and say that i am the Advertising Dksctor.or his principal clerk.of a newspaper of general circuits tion as efined in ORS 193.010 and 191.020.published a -- in the aforesaid county and atate:that t�s a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published M the satire issue of said newspaper for i successive and consecutive in the following issws: Nnv 1 4 1 nA4 s .9 i e 'tipfOre me thin 44 _ 0 Notary Public for Oregon >wfy : +c:>:xppes: "/20/83 AflFf4tT r P.: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Propos STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard ) 'being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I Posted in the follow'i �i�-ic and conspicuous p 7 Notice of Special Meeting for the Meeting c$b a cagy of dated _j•I— a copy of said noticu being hereto attached and by reference NWQ a part hereof, on the y day of .•.. =A- e�.�i._• 198i► Subscribed and sworn to before me this _ day of ..� 1996 �t�t1111t4ttftltt��r .. s ��� �'�, Notary Public for Oregon j. .� 1` r pTA:R Y i My Commission Expires: �-•���� 13 J 3 r l' i Y November 14, 1986 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that a Local Contract Review Board meeting, called by the Chairman, with the common consent of the Board, will be held on November 17, 1986 at 7:30 PM in the Tigard Civic Center Town Nall Room. The meeting is called for the purpose of awarding bid for police vehicles. ( rd Chairman, John E. Cook Y� _ Yt DATE I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: '� ( �� �Tv'e2� r Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation . . i 0 yro. ------------- t 4 "s'-' "�T.4'f..+•H=._.a S. _ -v�...crS k-;: a.J'fJ3C:;vdsex ar.�Y _ DATE I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) ' Item Description: �� P'J'jI G Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Prpon Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation _ _ 04r- 151740 1T. .xIC D4�c.972/� � S,/v1K AHtR Ph,1 . 7)i*-K yIN. J'6 "4t-Of-4 r3 L� LL345 S-w- cg uJeo S e ?u �56Sa 5. • O��c �J�- Y .a N N W N .tea M � v r p IP D N OC C e0 N 5 CSD N N to eT a F- N W .� Y O *+ aVi U at hhh--- �O at r V; N ... WO ca ca W p 2 r6, eondS L dl 3 M � p W M � S Sp cnN f` aJ ole IN 5K n V �c ?+ C 8 * 41 91,718 M Itl 0 F- I + � N V V (((III a. C W a n IS I C p -aI Inuj ca � „ O Q W W La Ili o ¢ 4 o en en p Is .. W WF � � m 0F- O 41 h > eon O eon eoi �I f L O 4-% 7 y F 7 to H ag O C .•e W <X N Z N ca ca W H C 4i C U O V1 (a U C O O y. 2 LL In H ODM >. y„ ,0 q- L cc ca W q- Id N C O to p re e4 a tz O +I d W � CpJ Id G CQp Nd 'O i! 7Ti C 4cl O C7 L OGiO 00 C lai rt � O O E p ,fie en en a en en O 2 i a L w GF- -jN 01` J G8w nH at) ^ F- a,2 ,C7 Et C "ah- F U -p �p U N � N -P E m C Cto W L O faf L. i-- N en C (O� tr A 16 a a L L L •N CP Ir W ^ t= In .7Q. m 7K "W W W m +°' it+f� ..4�''.-H '{* -+.�.,-sm�^.r,.^^. w•.ern• t.nnr..+ e�Rca.n �.:i.��.v, ,.�., R � -..'e-«-'s..,`_��sinx." o coc at d �� •W • •� ,� Col :o .� 2 AA ja 2p c 0 M .03 •W -ID I -M e ..w g :p :s C a : .e. L : 1r► w -46 41 VA 40 :g 4A to Af ..w 'a '° g Lot . dL - ci M A ia u o 0 0 0 0.. 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 •,o �' m CS ,>, OP4 En O C C Do �A 4' 0 ice+ 0 c0 o cn b 3 C 0 .14 ,.,� ++ 1 m M 'O C ca CD inc. C � C "gym C) X00 > E o a cv! U 3 cA U cA x ., c° 0. U U a cab �. C7 c. H cc - " o .�' .n x n a a =0 E oro o (p o a a � ra o A cv w u ., s mow' mm H 0 3 6a cm v m c. L4 ca E ceo � o .. a aro . 3 in w v o o N C UO 3:3G E C 3 H W ;oar rp m c) 0 � ¢ E 0r. Ea a � ° W ., W c_ p q ,.pr cti rr Y `� ` nj O 0z 8 cnd' Ow ... may � .0 = E +0+ O `" E C 1.4CL Cq E c, CL a �C c q s. � —4 z cc E 0 d• i. a. Eon , Do L4 o f H n W. La o o coo Q tl� .0 .-4 � o ate " w° a [ mN � — a. � .. A tea' �, n v a zp G`• o >' o E� MW » > >'No O � cime o , L; c� a 00 oeo � z ,, W cx» � z0 cu E gq C�i C eQ o �• v —4 8 E• 6 3 0 o ` M 0. e0 cin .. °. co �' c��n cn M . .• C o > SCD o .0 .4 CD � 0O bq am = o -.. ocn Z m o. i 3 H H c:' ¢ H r� �m c��i Y� CL c o °o G C 41 CO c. 0 2E .C" LO a� fes+ Y. n E 0 [ c rn m �• . ' p '" a r fpm]+ 0 0 aED n ° ' p m L [•, N z d C� V x E 6' co•�+ D+to w x 0 -4 _• c a E E a cap N O G. p cc pop CL 'O�y N tl G 0 R. 0 C7 q v° 00 cid O b cap y(MD p �' O 3 00 •.� 4. 0 0 > A O p) a 0 U � > .� 1 1 N rn N w 3 Q+ C L°. of a E EM � ca rn E to E op x a� v E oa o U o �. oro c0 3 " r a o Cl U) a ro a n f. Cy N p Ri cn e+) m O v .. d' w CO 0 s0+ „>-, (U) -4 40 4 -4 C 0 a Cis cc c c y c .. H a (n _ � � L ro +.• CG cc yy tJ� U p �� i. �, N n at —4 cm M n -4 UJ O E ,"_'i r"-�i d W " •. , AU0 +N+ Opw7It .+ C3m � ) E -14 . C30>4 m o O° xtoaro p °0) JO CDC c.ca �ccJ i co TJ ca z V1 W r� 00 CO G cn R. m m �" C �+ O a) C p --� 07 p, CO cp U �cn H t°. W 3 � 3aro� p, cYvCC H c�a0 $ E- :3 zAEaErc�. co. wgW aM � a ^c pCp C ° U a 0 V> �' m 0 rn (n m a -t� C a0" co CO -4 U O ++ « O • 4i •�+ 0 E~ O (. ,C f. .C. .-i a t-" am+ rn 0 W c c0 S. •.U. .. C ca N t0 �-, cn cn C cc 0 O OC C cEp 01-1 W �' °° ° c% `. °•' (n � >< m w M a �,� Tj � o ac0i 3 u x � a v v w E r+ s�. o „�,c ° A 00 t 0) a� "� S. W m co - cao -!, •i� y.�•1 Q o�' p ap >+ CD 43� oMoz ba) ' a0Za ° co 0 to x N CD 4' CZ 0 N Sc. "-' •c q.. (n a�a�, ¢ N .moi T aT+ .� H LS. — a z �r .-+ ti � CSC� � �+ •--� a 0 �'.. p „�„� O u CO > �N U Cl) ca b :3 '.a) }� MN p � 7oN + � OO (U o > zoaa) Q) n e*� 3 F [ :3 a) W �7 L, f. >+ • .Cr _ 0 •r ON M z x O \ �� MC0 o co q 0 q N I7 ..� H •.�, �+ R. ; ''' V7 �. c, -4 O J " C •� ^, '$ b O b O .1 .-i N N CD V- asam ab � b 4" a) o / nH i 3E. > > > > 0 0 � r ar �i cp a a4 w w 0 4- cp H CJ z Z Z z C� IM CD 3 vs m >,�' cm. a) sE. °' �o p r. o 0o ca. o ��g� I- CD .oco ao m CL— Co Em `� CO 0 CDm NMv . , axi o m a E � o m m o a N a,� >°�cmaA a w p tto �A a m o Co s>. O b > p ro pf.> 4 y •C p m it O N O tff y to m d O D G p E O 0 :�) O p F m f. a) � Cn 0o O a) 'O C E f' a) CL �' M A 'O 00 3 F 2m. w A Y > N p cc cA � ..� m a A 3 Ci a 3 c. .a m p m . n >, r CZpQ .., L b 00 C13 m +r- 0 V r- opo O O W m G co p 3 O O O R. C p W O Ci. a co 3 cU p 0 0 _� '-' c�0m � c. = c � inG,o0 .v3 moo m > .4 � o �" Ym •° Gz >1 .p„ C '' cEn a) „pyo C. ,, z > C p — r O a umi UJ p ~CO `►O. ( C c. (occ to .0p � b7 coU , �j NO En m Cm) tom. Crn pl v E u t m e W e�Uap m oQ ¢ a `n o v°�i � b cz G. a0wGs7 �+ w a ., a o ,r, m A a.,. ►•� cn m .� Z y o m °O C o a� cc .+CP V) �, o W �-+ ca p '^N .�' ° ° a a) .. 3 C 3 W C1, ai ~ W o c» o b .,. 'a', a 4 ca a o 4) cc o o � c `�° � � o � � O m c � a .� aa. o f apoo a � � S. aL as «+ O .•� a O p .v lw a) -4 > '• C O cE. Cp G w cc q� .U-, >' G (-� •' w+ 000..E w Comto r _ .0 I r- co >" ocnoCEomc° am EQ ts. a4. o o p. H zb ' m � o E CO � — °°� `. � ° tea a: ~ m � m � � � o. I s O p a c. U x O 'O E o eco .. — .. m e. o c. E V Q .� E►J� > V E E .,, > VtN� mo C � •- p F +' ;) R. 1 m a N a t0 C E C O@ Q i ., Q mO .. •'+ m —+ ,� O O :» > �". D to z ., > p t, + w {L i0 .0, Ol eti w m O p p w R.cmn N H «°+ Cu CO C co " � «� m — � �� o � w t1, C C*) E cii fA $ C O cn Z 0+ L+ cc V CA C Ey cm 00� 0 � ii S. C7 m c ►7 0 Q. O • j; r� +' .fir p O O C to C) pp .-+ 00 V 0 '^� ..i A°.. -- v47r+ �r' E =0 U .CinaZ «�.7 � aa0 O � t'C, (a C: 13" CD 0) � � U I cc � ^CDH a CL M v a a� a)cn o .. p E ., ° ». � � 0 �' m C.0 mU ,ai .-° � C > co a cm, axiom ca 3 ? L� o o > m aO � m � Do N M C r W ta. +-+° m c. .0 O it c�4 B O 'Y~' 3 ° i 0 co c gym, ammo m ® ..7 a) am a -5 c,.5to p o �� ) 3: o m co) •� C � a) ®co as a 0,44 P-4 L. a m a c � 'm .mC a ti § !S m A o a) vCD o'� }' }' ac a) p0 w .E-, 'dO � oC m atn m „ 3Nw It co co z 0 CD Ld >> > coo y .� a O o co EO o m a) FUU > O � >° 3 � p 'deo p0v rL ooh 3 z 0) O W C G. m O 3 ..+ O p m ca O 'd 'G r- 00) - 0 0 .0 � � a. V t)O—4 p � C o x a) a.Xc 0 r o m .-,} 00 ° m) o-' %, —4 N `� .dam c° v im' ° - a " o ca o N o p iC cn � �34 u L4 Ll o5Ep � � 4 SCO -4 � 0 A.� � � A.3 zM �+ _� oap ra c0 a+ m > rIn o 0. O0 m 00 N .-, ++ N �" N +-' N p.H E O —, Q C. U D � 4 to OD co E .,, O so. I � 0n � •~ � � a z N o H co) C.cnEx"' w co ma O E 3 tp.� m t. G.r,:� c7 ., c0 m n �' U m a) ,.., W > N a w V � CO E 0,.7 CIS >m z 0 C G m o -� Z a u� CO pu cm. c. H ¢ m N C C � o O A sm, 0-4 O a) U .3 >) H w O,� �! - a) � �.+ 03 a) W ;�.Co.b a O E _, c. •-� ¢ p, N O a CID, U •r+ o a, mc.-4 > to 'da) � q,� a� a mpWacooi.., >3 mom >' VNA ,.m� a p ycao a � � � CGLOp. mp7G .�, m m T: cn •N a 3 z x pa E" �, it c.� F U cn w as > a m cc m cF � C = Ha) cm N al c as °w °PC o M;,,, 3 V ,a CL o o cp.'�'i.0 o0 G.. A' �' C W E p a) r; OLI pG a D � � op bee CA m . oo mp w+ o C o oA � x o o o a) c o C? p. U U ..] CLF w t. .+'F c0 •� ,7+ N f, 1 u k k b. gyp" r • x 9 I `MW Ta • 14 art � 4 44e gnl rA ' ,.__.,__•__-rte_ _- F - sc.,y ,E xf y .r. Y .r `-' -----`� x Wa `,�, :- x_.,+`+vii•-++�_ �"'-. ��" � ,_ '*" a z _ t �, #i '!tri r•`�-t '- "'s$$,, u '''s �S�z `,q $ s•, "�s.+ ��' a VI" . •: �_ r� 9 .,'. —� :...,_..,-.�. YC'-t t; sf x'+ �}� s s Y 5;. ^s a a �g Fill CYCz 11C owdc Ic 4oaaGiD I�II1�� - I�I�Ir� ism: Kilo fi Imo■ 1 � Is■r I !�=��i�� I Q�i�� �i� ''ill I .nimp s� I • ` '� � ir IL til HIM SIR all WHEN 131, !�. E �■[r111111■i I i iiia i 1 1 1 I�rrllir■i b ��■ f It 1 ■I 1 �Illr /11�f 1 I/ 1� ■ f■ I�NIIII■I !If oil fl■; ' �` �i �il�rl, r Hlull ■ / ■I��IrI■I f� 1■ILr 111■l 1 1 1 1■�ih�ll■I q �IIf111�11N11ii71111�1■IfR.;ll■I � 1111 1 111 !� 1■��f��11■I F t 1 111Willi 30 �� �. � � � f�� 1111111■I � IIIIIH �r�; �! ' � /� 1111111■I 11■ lull35 II■I �1 = r1 [� 1■11/lel ■I III MILLI I► i4 1�1■I 1111111■I �r����� .:friaF r■a ilrfrll■I ! !t 1c 1 \! 1■II 1W 4I111 I�hit . �1l111■I , .� =v ... VW� Z ► �V VF . �.. . y y K M V r ZZZ r w _ MON`� rN Y.W.IW> K< ^•�y i y My > `S4S4 ArF i Ay�� v W Ila ..y tr ... �� t �gg+r ,� • err. ��~ ��� 1 Y�� 0000• 1-4 HIM • yS � jM. 0 ...O O H� ` ��•S tl N •0 0 � W '''������4���'''���i''���.���www�''''r'r'r� 00 0500 ti }� � ►.� eeee•• 00000 .: _ IBM = W � � W V 00 0J00 aN 0000 S y� ` r 'R3Y Y' r Wr0 ui�uI. o 0 0 pJ M !WN yyy J Y J O 00 O O Y= 0 y was Big= =Fi B'S o ti :Y W . Nis r a• =N�+ O LJ •e••• �O �St�� r ..N 4 � ' November 16, 1986 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Attn: Tigard City Council Hear Tigard City Council, We received a letter from the City of Tigard regarding our basketball poles. After Checking with Mr. George Steele, codes enforcement officer, he indicated the problem was the street sweepers could not get around the basketball poles. The street sweeper has been around our block and did not seem to have any problem due to the basketball poles as the street was cleaned. We have our basketball poles in front of our homes for our children, to give them good clean fun. We live in a quite neigh- borhood and have had no problems due to these basketball hoops. We do not feel that having these basketball poles are in any way preventing or obstructing the free passage of pedestrians or vehicular traffic. Could you please check into this ordinance as we do not feel it would benefit anyone by removing these basketball poles? Thank you for your help and time on this matter. S' cer ly, andy and Nancy Krupp 15805 S.W. Stratford L p Jef and Ju y Davison 15825 S.W. Stratford Loop •'November 3, 1986 aYY(WTWARD • OREGON 25 Years ofServk.e 1461-1986 Randell Gene & Nancy Ann Krupp 15805 SW Stratford Loop Tigard, OR 97223 re: WCTM 2S 1 1 IDD T!. 47aa 15805 SW_Srr^ fa a Lnap- Rear Property Owner: It has coxae to my attention that several residences within the city have placed objects in the public right-of-way such as basketball hoops, fences, and mailboxes. Tigard Municipal Code Sec.10.32.200 states "No person shall place, park, deposit or leave upon any street orother publicay, sidewalk or pts or curb any article or thing or material which in an way prevents, obstructs the free passage of pedestrian or vehicular traffic." Violation of the above ordinance carries a penalty of up to $250 per day of violation. We request your cooperation in the removal of any such objects under your control. If you have any question, you may contact me between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. at 639-4171, ext. 316. Very truly yours, '4 . - George Str sale Codas Enforcement Officer GS:sbi37 Y 13125 SW HaU Bhal.PO;Bax 23397,Tigard;Oregon 97223 Rrim, 39-eN171." t MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council November 17, 1986 FROM, William A. Monahan, Director, �u7 Community Development SUBJECT: Issues Raised at the November 12 Meeting on Right-of-stay Annexation On November 12, Liz Newton and I attended a public meeting on the proposed ROW annexation of Walnut, 121st, and Fonner Streets. Over 50 people attended. The following are some of the major concerns raised: 1) The majority of people feel that the only reason the annexation is proposed is to eventually force the surrounding properties into the City against the wills of the property owners. 2) Most feel that Fonner Street needs to be improved. Most feel that 121st and Walnut are now adequately maintained by the County and will be in the future. 3) Property owners possessing deeds indicating their ownership to the midpoint of the street expressed concern over liability for both street and bikepath maintenance. 4) Weight limits on the City portions of 121st and Walnut are not now enforced. One citizen did state that enforcement has improved. 5) Could the City do a traffic analysis for Fonner Street to determine if the classification of the street needs to be increased? 6) People expressed a desire to have a vote on property annexation. 7) Now can the City afford to maintain these roads given the defeat of the County gas tax and the fact that Fonner is in such poor shape? 8) There is a need for a connection between Walnut and Bull Mountain Road. Residents were concerned that improvements to Murray Blvd. and 135th will increase traffic on Walnut resulting in a need to eventually widen Walnut. 9) If Walnut is widened, who will pay? 10) If Fonner is improved as needed, who will pay? We informed the people that the project could compete for CIP funds. /br192 4�} MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council November 7, 1986 FROM: Planning Staff FAQ/AXI-) SUBJECT: Right-Of-Way Annexations Attached is a copy of a public notice you should have received in the mail. Please note on the bottom of the back side of the sheet, staff had indicated that the public hearings on these annexations will be rescheduled from November 17, 1966 to December 8, 1986. In order to do this, Council should open the public hearing on each item on November 17th and make a motion to continue to December 8th stating that Council may accept further testimony and ii.formation at that time. This procedure will allow Council to accept public testimony on hecember 8, 1986 and will not require another public notice to be mailed. EAN:lw/4297A i 3 t Y � v CITY OF TWARD STI IFFORMATIONAI l03RTING OREGON 25 Yeas of Sernee 19e1-19e6 / The City of Tigard invites you to an informational meeting to get information and provide input regarding the proposed right-of-way annexations of portions of SW WALNUT, SW FONNER, AND SW 121st. Whether inside or outside the City limits, we need to hear from you about possible annexation of these roads to the City for maintenance purposes. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND WHEN: Wednesday, November 12, 1986 TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH - LGI ROOM 10665 SW Walnut Street i The map below indicates the proposed right-of-way annexations: SW WALNUT - From SW TIEDEMAN TO SW 135th SW FONNER. - Brom SW WALNUT to SW 121st SW 121st - From SW WALNUT to SW ROSE VISTA S.W. TA Uj S. � 0 '•^� N / l. •`yr; �a a SE STA OR. S.W. ANNEXATION FACT SHEET The annexation proposals being discussed on NOVEMBER 12, 1986 involve RIGHT-OF-WAY only: If approved, no private property would be included. Later on however. annexation could become an option for more property owners. This fact sheet is designed to clear up misconceptions on what future annexation could mean to individual property owners. QUESTIONS How does annexation affect current land use designations? ANSWERS Although this area is within Washington County, land use designations have been determined by the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. When properties are annexed, the sonieg requirements may change slightly but the basic land use designatiun will not be changed. QUESTIONS Will annexation allow the City to force property owners into sever or street LID's (Local Improvement District)? ANSWERS No. The LID policy of the City of Tigard and Wasington County are similar. LID's for sever and street improvements are formed by petition of the property owners in the area and undergo extensive raview by staff and Council. QUESTIONs Why can't the County continue to provide local services? ANSWFFds The Washington County 2000 Study shows that next year the urban unincorporated areas will have to pay extra for neighborhood Police Patrol. local Street Maintenance and Street Lighting Services through County Special Service District taxes if they wish to receive more than basic countywide services. Annexation to the City would cost less next year for those comparable local services than through t.--i County. According to the Washington County 2000 Study just released October 110 1986, comparable services next year fora $50,000 home would cost: URBAN UNINCORPORATED COST 0 RATE) TIGARD COST (S RATE) Streets $ 60.00 (8 1.00/thousand All these are within Police $115.80 (1 1.93/thousand Tigard City tax rate of $1.94/Thousand Street Lighting 3 40.00 M $3-4/month - ANNUAL COST $216 or $3.60/thousand $116 or ($1.94/thousand) ON NOVEMBER 17, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RESCHEDULE THE PUBLIC HEARING WHICH WAS SCHEDULED FOR CONSIDERATION OF THESE RIGHT-OF-WAY ANNE)CATIONS. THE NEW PUBLIC HEALING WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1986. TO ALLOW ADEQUATE TINE TO REVIEW YOU& CO?MSM. PLEASE ATTEND THE INFORMATIONAL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 12, 1986 SO'TRkT TOUR CONCERNS ARE ADDRESSED! CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 0 AGENDA OF: November 17, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: - ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW 135th Avenue PREVIOUS ACTION: LID – Phase I PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD OIC CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: City Council POLICY ISSUE Preliminary evaluation report on formation of a local improvement district for improvements to SW 135th Avenue. INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a Preliminary Evaluation Report which describes the proposed LID, describes a proposal to include a portion of Murray Blvd. extension, reviews a preliminary meeting with property owners, and makes recommendations for proceeding with the LID. portion of The Report recommends that the Council consider reclassifying a 135th Avenue from major collector to minor collector. Property owners are aware of the Report and may wish to address the Council in support of or opposition to the Report's recommendations. We are still in the preliminary stages of this LID. The November 17th meeting is not a formal hearing on this LID. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Per TMC 13.04.02), the Council may: 1. Direct staff to terminate work on the proposed district; or 2. Adopt a resolution directing staff to prepare a preliminary engineer's report, or 3. Include in the resolution any alternatives that Council intends for staff to consider. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of a preliminary engineer's report is estimated to be $7,000 to $10.000. SUGGESTED ACTION 1. That the Council review the Preliminary Evaluation Report, consider any additional comments received from property owners, and consider whether to accept the recommendations of the Preliminary Evaluation Report. If the consensus of the Council is to proceed with the LID, staff will prepare the appropriate resolution for inclusion in the consent agenda of December 1, 1986. 2. That the Council adopt a motion to "initiate a 1.'—prehensive Plan Amendment to consider revising the Transportation Map designation of SW 135th Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and Murray Boulevard and to revise the Transportation Map to show Murray Boulevard in accordance with the current Urban Planning Area Agreement between the City of Tigard and Washington County". /br179 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION REPORT t' 135th/MURRAY L.I.D. November, 1986 On August 11, 1986, _the 'City Council initiated the local improvement district (LID) process for improvements to SW 135th Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. This report describes the preliminary work which has been completed to determine the feasibility of an LID. BACKGROUND SW 135th Avenue, a narrow two-lane roadway without shoulders, is the primary access route for a rapidly growing residential neighborhood in northwest Tigard. Development in recent years has greatly increased the traffic volumes on SW 135th. Substantial additional residential development is proposed for the area in the next few months. Improvements to SW 135th are needed to safely accommodate the increasing traffic. The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map calls for the street to be upgraded to major collector standards. In July of 1986, roadway jurisdiction on 135th Avenue was transferred from Washington County to the City of Tigard. In September of 1986, an Urban Planning Area Agreement was executed between Washington County and the City of Tigard defining the approximate alignment for an extension of Murray Boulevard to meat 135th Avenue at a point near Walnut Street. A minor realignment of 135th Avenue is required to form a tea intersection with Murray Boulevard. FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS AT 135TH AND SCROLLS FERRY ROAD Improvements at the intersection of 135th Avenue and Scholl* Ferry Road are already funded under State and County programs. The MSTIP (Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program) three-year levy approved by the voters in May of 1986 provides for widening of Scholls Ferry Roast. The widened roadway will have 4 lanes plus center turn lanes. The MSTIP project includes traffic signals at 435th Average. The widened roadway will follow the alignment of Old Scholls Ferry Road. The Scholls/Old Scholls intersection will be moved westward and reconfigured to eliminate the sight distance restrictions that now exist near 135th Avenue. Planning is underway for this major street improvement with completion scheduled for 1989. Map No. 1 shows the long-range plan being considered for arterial and collector streets in the area. Recognizing the special problems that exist in the area of Scholls/Old Scholls/135th, the State is proceeding with some interim improvements to be constructed in 1987. The interim improvements include revision of Scholls/Old Scholls intersection to make Old Scholls the through route, signalization of the .'reconfigured intersection and addition of left-turn lanes at the new intersection and at 135th Avenue. `Page: 's These improvements on Scholls Ferry Road are already funded and are not part of the proposed L.I.D. . PROPOSED L.I.D. PROJECT — i The proposed L.I.D. project is the reconstruction of SW 135th Avenue from Scholls Ferry Road to the City limits near Walnut Street. The reconstruction would include minor realignment of 135th Avenue to form a tee intersection with Murray Boulevard in accordance with the long-range plan. The proposed project includes construction of roadway pavement, curbs, sidewalks, street lighting, and storm drainage. Additional right-of-way would + be acquired where necessary. Conduits for utility crossings would be installed whore required to avoid future cutting of the pavement. r Also being considered as part of the LID is construction of the Murray Boulevard extension between SW 135th Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road. This invol=as construction of a new roadway including curbs, sidewalks, street lighting and storm drainage. SW 135th Avenue is shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map as a major collector street. Murray Boulevard is also envisioned as a major collector street. City standards for major collector streets are a curb-to-curb street width of 44 feet and minimum sidewalk widths of 5 feet. The width of 44 feet allows for marking of three lanes (one through lane in each direction plus a center turn lane) with room for a bike lane in each direction. It is estimated that the proposed improvements to SW 135th Avenue would cost approximately 51.200.E and that the construction of Murray Boulevard between 135th and Scholls Ferry would cost approximately $500,000. Hence, the total estimated LID cost is approximately $1,700,000. These costs are very preliminary and would need to be reviewed in detail prior to formation of a LID. Cost estimates include anticipated engineering, inspection and administrative costa as well as construction costs. Cost estimates do not include any costa of right--of-wsy, acquisition. Approximately half of the required right-of-way for 135th Avenue has already been donated by the adjoining property owners or will be donated soon as part of planned developments. The primary landowner along the Murray Boulevard extension route has indicated a willingness to donate the required right-of-way for Murray Boulevard. At this point it is assumed that the remaining property owners will also donate the required right-of-way. (See additional discussion under "Assessments".) f L.I.D. BOUNDARY A proposed LID boundary is shown on Map No. 2. The boundary has been established to include those properties and subdivisions having their primary access off of 135th Avenue or Murray Boulevard within the project limits. This is consistent with the City's policy of requiring .: development to } participate in the improvements to adjoining collector streets. Properties with access to both 135th/Murray and to Scholls Ferry Road or Walnut Street would be only partially in the LID in recognition of the fact that they must also participate in the improvement of the other adjoining street. y Or l. Page 2 z The proposed LID boundary includes approximately 167 acres of property - (excluding streets) in nearly 500 parcels. L.I.D. AREAS OUTSIDE THE GITY Portions of the proposed LID are outside of the Tigard city limits. QRS undaries if approve allows cities to he Ci willlneed to requestoutside approval from the Board approved by the County. The City of Washington County Commissioners. NON-REMONSTRANCE AGREEMENTS As a condition of development the City usually requires a developer to half-street improvements on adjoining streets. However, when a provide half- improvement is considered to be untimely or impractical at the time of development, the City accepts a non-remonstrance agreement in which the land owner agrees not to object to future formation of a LID to provide the street improvements. Non-remonstrance agreements are binding on subsequent owners of the land. Non-remonstrance agreements have been recorded on approximately 22% of the land within the LID. Additional non-remonstrance agreements are pending. IMPACTS Benefits of the proposed improvements to 135th Avenue include a smoother riding surface, improved safety, and reduced maintenance costs. Benefits of the construction of Murray Boulevard include addition of an important segment of the City's planned transportation network and provision of access to land which is currently undeveloped. Murray Boulevard would also tend to divert through traffic from 135th Avenue; also, it would provide an alternate access to Scholls Ferry Road, reducing the need for left turn movements at Scholls Ferry/135th intersection. The LID would satisfy the obligation of owners of adjoining land to provide the street improvements as required by Tigard's Development Code. There would also be some adverse impacts on adjoining properties. One would be the costs to be borne by property owners in the LID. In some locations widening of 135th would require removal of some existing landscaping; this would be true primarily at existing homes outside of the newer subdivisions. Also, improvements to the streets will make the streets more attractive for through During reconstruction of 135th smoother Fivenuetawill tfiere will be to increase vehicle pe disruption and inconvenience to motorists. SCHEDULE If the Council decides to proceed with the LID, we anticipate that formal hearings on the LID formation could occur in early 1987 and constriction could be completed during the summer of 1987. 4iSSESSMENTS Traditionally, street LID assessments aro b--:edon front footage or some-combination of the two. However, LID laws allow the use propQrty area or of any assessment method which equitably distributes the costs to the properties in proportion to the benefits received. page,,,3 s In considering assessment methods for this LID, we need to acknowledge the diversity of existing and potential land development in the LID. Zoning �s is primarily residential but varies from R-4.5 (low density) to R-25 (medium-high density). Existing development includes single-family homes on urban subdivision lots, older single-family homes on large rural-type lots, and apartment buildings. Much of the land is currently undeveloped. The front footage method of assessment does not work well for this LID. Under the front footage method, a subdivision lot with a rear or side yard on 135th Avenue would receive a very large assessment ($7,000 or more) while an internal subdivision lot would receive a zero assessment, even though the benefits to the two lots are about the same. Also, some existing older homes on large lots would receive very large assessments if calculated based on front footage. If the area method is used, assessments would be approximately $0.23 per square foot. The area method tends to shift some of the LID costs from the large undeveloped parcels onto the subdivisons. Assessments on subdivision lots might range from $1,150 for a 5,000 square foot lot to over $2,300 for the larger lots. Several of the existing subdivisions have lot sizes varying throughout this size rango. However, all of the lots are developed with single-family homes and, hence, all receive about the same benefit from the proposed street improvements. The area method does not appear to be equitable. In a 1984 LID report prepared for Washington County *, it was recommended that assessments for a 135th Avenue LID be based on the traffic generation potential for each parcel. This appears to be a way to distribute the costs of improving a collector street in proportion to the benefit each parcel will ; receive from the improvement; i.e. , in proportion to the use each parcel may derive from the improved street. Under this method, the potential development of each parcel would be determined based on zoning with recognition given to development restrictions placed on some parcels due to natural features such as Summer Creek. The traffic generating potential would then be evaluated Led on average figures for each type of development published in the "Trip Generation Report" of the Institute of Transportation Engineers or similar recognized sources. This method tends to shift some of the LID cost from the Iwo-density single-family lots to the large undeveloped lots with high-density zoning. Generally, under this method all subdivision lots would pay the same assessment and it appears that their assessments would be under $1,000. As mentioned earlier, we have assumed that right-of-way will be donated at no cost to the LID. If it is necessary to purchase right-of-way, then these costs would also need to be assessed. It seems reasonable that those properties (including existing subdivisions) where right-of-way has been donated should not have to participate in the cost of purchasing additional right-of-wayIf so, then front footage appears to be an equitable way of distributing any right-of-way costs. * "Feasibility Report for the SW -135th Ave./SW 130th Ave./SW Walnut St. Local ImprovementDistrict project" prepared by Ginther Engineering, Inc., datad April 17, 1984. Page 4 OWNERS PROPERTY OW 11EETInG . Y Wooley and Bill Monahan of the City staff met On October 21, 1986, Rand - rt owners from the LID. The meeting was held at Fowler junior High E with property le attended the meeting. By a show of hands, School. Approximately 60 people most of the people indicated they were owners of subdivisions lottss. Only three indicated that they represented larger parcels in the propos- Concerns and suggestions raised at the meeting included the following: that Murra Blvd. ro rties must for Mkarra Blvd. There hthe vcostsonforn135th inclusion of Murray Boulevard in the LID may Avenue property owners. This can be addressed in the and Calculating p estimated assessments report by preparing optional boundaries both with and without Murray Boulevard. LID Boundary. Some people suggested that the LID boundary should be expanded to a properties that may use 135th Avenue for access. ether ProPesou Areas suggested included theresidential and the Katherine Street/129thSAvenue especially the Fern Street neighborhood, area. no doubt these people do sometimes use 135th Avenue for access and they however, would be probably could be included in the asD these° subdivisions do not abut the inconsistent with past Tigard policy, might have toicy then we proposed street improvements. If we amen�nt at pofanyurs LID for improvement of include the 135th Avenue property owners Walnut Street or for southward extension of Murray Boulevard. Propertyowners outside the proposed boundary have not been notified of LID meetings to date. If the City Council wishes to consider an expanded LID boundary, staff should schedule another informal meeting with property owners and make aPproPriate revisions re tris in evaluation oto rassure assure compliance with ort prior to ur rer to the preliminary engineering report, LID procedures. th of 135th• Some People questioned the need for athree-lane Street Wid street and suggested that a narrower lanestreet would addedcritical adequate.ical intersections. a two-lane street with a center turn Currently. 135th is designated as a majoere r� csome cf r on thhe Cmight Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map support reclassification of 135th north of Murray as a minor collector. volumes The Comprehensive Plan indicates that Year i 000 hour al ak major collector streets. on 135th will be lower than those on our tyP Recent traffic projections done in conjunction and withextthec+nSiut westcomplCorridor Study seem to confirm this. Once Murray studies indicate that turaffic vothe lumes onlls r135th and ry, and 2 on Walnut 1st will c are Qxpected tto through traffic. Th be lower', The projected volumes on 135th are similar to those on minor collector streets such as north Dakota and Sattler. The decision to bring 135th into Murray as a tee intersection tends to th as a lower classification than Murray support the concept of 135 (in terms of;traffic usage). Page 5 Some of the area along the west side of 135th has developed at densities substantially lower than the zoning would have allowed. This results in a decrease in projected traffic volumes on 135th. Based on these factors, Council could consider revising the classification of 135th (from Scholls Ferry to Murray) from major collector to minor collector. A Comprehensive Plan amendment would be necessary. The City standard for minor collectors is 40 feet curb-to-curb with five-foot sidewalks. This width is usually marked as a two-lane street with room for bike lanes but it can be marked with a center turn lane if necessary. If we go to this standard, it would be desirable to provide extra width near the intersections at Scholls Ferry and at Murray. All options assume that parking is prohibited. A continuous canter turn lane usually improves safety but the safety question is probably not a big factor with the traffic volumes we are projecting for 135th. On Murray Boulevard, the center turn lane should be retained for safety and capacity. The change from major collector standard to minor collector standard would result in a savings in construction cost of approximately 3% to 4% an 135th and some savings in future maintenance costs. it would slightly reduce the impacts on existing landscaping. 7,3 through traffic paving its share? It was suggested that since through traffic would also use 135th, that residents of the area should not pay all the improvement costs. In the past, the City has on occasion contributed a share of LID costs from streets SDC funds when the improvement was considered to be a benefit to general traffic circulation as well as a benefit to the LID. Council should consider whether this LID qualifies for such support. General traffic objections. People living along 135th expressed some general concerns about the traffic on the street. "The street is already too close to my house." "Wider roads will mean higher speeds. The traffic already goes too fast on the rough road that is there now." By definition. collector streets are designed to accommodate greater vnlumes of traffic than local streets and usually have higher traffic speeds than local streets. The Comprehensive Plan has designated a system of collector and arterial streets to accommodate the through traffic movements. By providing a system of collector streets, we discourage through traffJc movements in our residential subdivisions. SW 135th Avenue has developed as a collector street in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed improvements will not change the use of the street. Instead, the improvements will attempt to safely accommodate the traffic usage. THE NEXT STEP If the Council wishes to proceed with the LID, the next step in the LID process will be the preparation of a preliminary engineer's report. The report will make a more detailed estimate of LID costs, including an estimate of the assessment for each parcel; it will include a legal description of the LID boundary; and it will provide a detailed roll of property owners. Page:6 i STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1, The City Engineer recommends the following: a 1. That the LID boundary be as shown on Map No. 2; provided, that minor boundary adjustments be made in the preliminary engineer's report as necessary to conform to property lines and proposed plata. 2. That the Council consider reclassification of 135th (between. Murray ano Scholls Ferry). This can be accomplished by a Council motion to initiate a Comprehensive plan Amendment to consider revising the designation of SW 135th Avenue on the Transportation Map. 3. That assessments be based on the traffic generation potential of each parcel for all costs except right-of-quay acquisition and that the preliminary engineer's report define the method for calculating the assessments. 4. That right-of-way acquisition costs be assessed on a front-footage basis and that properties which have already donated right-of-way be excluded from the front-footage assessment. 5. That the Board of County Commissioners be requested to approve inclusion of property outside Tigard City limits. 6. That a preliminary engineer's report be prepared based on the above recommendations and that the report consider an LID both with and without construction of Murray Boulevard west of SW 135th Avenue. /br179 r � Page 7' .*�v� x-f�'yh� a:vY.., .__� .fad.¥`•��1 o,cSaXiF»�, .e!^Cfsa`:. v.<.^,n�.e.ai,in. ..' :bk LONG-RANGE ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN {` SCHOLLE PERRY RIS./, MURRAY BLVD. VICINITY i SCALE: 1%6711' f t d . f f �L'ra^�trsi:' ks: ....:.. , J_.....,...�c, www M OWN �arN on WE. ®1� a.aarr : ■� rrtt r Vw Zvi limb mss,, • still till11r am MOOR _r tl i ■ Ing 67 In �_ �mn . ►tl11i . rarur�n �► 4r V#1-4' I 1. l��_n ■■/ ■ems■■r■r.3��rs�r■ tea. L•1a ;■, i i �lp M, ONE W� i Cry �■" �� , man mean k goo mo®r :`���� � fir► a� � ■ii■ WON ��/� ■■� i■ 7 . .1 �wr�� rm ■■ �-�� ■ ' �L ■ i '•11 ► /,�: • a{'"{:r.'ti t I'.'•"♦ •' :1' •.t"•LI:r•1 • 1 '.• ✓ s t 1 Y: -. •I •• � i►i.}• '1' :r' \.11:.ti "J;A ':+1 • I` •.• 't.i:► .► a Y:J:•-,. r.• C:i:t- :.•t.f. 1- :,N :r1 • 4:1' _.• it YT I' •4: Y.0 -..•..•:fJf Y ii�_•l- t.:Y `it Y r'+ '/: i,:n.:' :� ;.n•Y;J Ya: .; :J'. - (♦ t i• "N.-•, ".'a ".• • / _if.. It ►.: .-fir :►� _ - �: . •► Y{.•C :r;•,'. 1; -• ' mss' - --•• '•,i 1:1 _ •.:� /:1 • - - . .: ,:•. - Y- Y:I� •;'. `.rw •.-- -,►h:.•:�: i-•-. • 'MAS.:•: t - j ' r -.t • Nov. 4 1986 `. V Dear Sir, 11u.'r�Q This letter is in response to the proposed local that is being formed for 135th and the improvement district extension of 145th. I have no objections to paying for improvements to 135th. This road is in terrible condition and in need tig o immediate repair or rebuilding. Also ihtyat Schoare �ls Ferry. I improve the road why not include a lig do have some concerns on why it has to be three lanes wide. I also am curious why the sidewalks are included imtheotIb� The sidewalk in front of my house was paid for bye everyone in the area. I totally object to paying for the extension of 145th. I see this as a benefit to people outside the area, developers in particular. This will cause more traffic on the south end of 135th. This is the only safe way to get out of the area. The intersection at 135th and Scholls Ferry very dangerous. With the trucks coming around the corner at 55+ and the cars coming from Murray that don't even stop at the stop sign. Once a string of cars gets started through the intersection you just have to set and wait until all the cars go through, or some traffic from the east stops ' them. I sincerly hope you will dropthheextension of Murray to 135th. Other than that I support Richard and Carol Hill 13285 S.W. Brittany Dr. Tigard Or. 97223 :.,,amu i I .tL."ML 7,117 J tV.-F kk po F , r __ l x . r zs�r G1CIATED •� ANGPORT'ATION GINEERING t ANNING, "rRAFF I C AlVA �YSIIS AOR 'T I GARm At_1qER'Tac3Na l.� TA s y Y p � k �Ry y$ $PLANNING, INC, t A. GUPVRIGI:zi'x ASS( �{ATED TRAM RTA"n ENGINEE r i TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ALBERTSONS PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND DURHAM ROAD TIGARD,OREGON �y i ' PREPARED FOR WESTECH ENGINEERING, INC SALEM,OREGON son ( PREPARED BY - [ , ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. 16016 S.W. BOONES FERRY ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OR. 97034 'N 66-260 JULY 1986 V TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS OF ALBERTSONS PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND DURHAM ROAD TLOCATED IN TIGARD ,OREGON INTRODUCTION This report represents the findings of a transportation analysis for a 177,600 square foot commercial complex development to be located on the southwest corner of Pacific Highway and Durham Road in Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this transportation analysis is to assess the transportation impacts of FULL development on the surrounding road system. The appendices to this report contain a summary of all key technical calculations and field data collected as part of this traffic analysis. 3 l ��(�ST i SVG C[�ND i T�ONzS STUDY AREA LOCATION The proposed site for this development is situated in the City of Tigard, Oregon on the southwest corner of Pacific Highway and a Durham Road. The proposed development consists of a 43,000 square foot ( , Albertsons Food Center and approximately 155,000 square feet of i commercial retail development. The area surrounding the site is generally residential except for the commercial areas fronting Pacific Highway on the northwest corner and the northeast corner of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. F Pacific Highway is designated as a major arterial street connecting the City of Tigard with the suburban areas to the south (i.e. Newberg and McMinville) . Pacific Highway at Durham Road is a limited access roadway with 2 through lanes each direction and left turn pockets at the intersection. f Durham Road is currently a two (2) lane roadway with no parking allowed on either sides of the street. Durham Road serves as an east/west collector street between Tualatin and the Kings City area to the west. TRAFFIC CONTROL ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 2 The. intersection of Pacific Highway and Durham Road is currently signalized and operates on a split phasing east/west and as , - separate phases for the north/south direction. The signal operates on a 90 second cycle during all periods of the day and is fully actuated for all legs of the intersection. All other roadways and driveways within the area are controlled ( by stop signs. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Where no available traffic volumes were available, ATEP performed a number of additional automatic traffic counts during June of 1986. In order to estimate evening peak-hour turning movement patterns at the intersection of Pacific Highway and Durham Road, ATEP performed a number of manual turning movement counts during the am and pm peak hours. These counts classified all traffic approaching the intersection according to the type n-t movement (lef t-turn,through, or right-turn) . Exhibit i is L. aummary of these counts. S Based on the results of these counts, it was concluded that the weekday evening peak hour of traffic flow within this area occurs from 4c45 to 5:45 p.m. and constitutes about 10 percent of the recorded weekday traffic volume. Since the weekday evening peak hour is also the time when the impact of the traffic generated by the proposed development will be greatest, this was the time that was used in all subsequent analyses. Past experience has shown that while retail center traffic by itself may be as much as 50 percent heavier later in the evening or on weekends, the combination of normal and retail center-generated traffic is maximum during the weekday evening peak for commuting home-to-work trips. CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE Level of Service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the fdegree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an ` intersection or roadway segment. This degree of comfort includes such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impedances caused by other vehicles. As 3 originally defined with the 1965 dighWay Gagacity Manual (Reference 3) , six grades are used to denote the various LOS; these grades are shown in Table 1. Using this definition, it is generally agreed that "D" LOS is the minimum acceptable for an urban area. A number of different procedures have been developed for t estimating the LOS at signalized intersections. For this analysis, a relatively sophisticated procedure was employed that involved the use of m computerized simulation and optimization � a fi ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 3 o F c c co� .Xcc am a rd i L o ac 9 It �r s sk L O 3 L , � O *44W ae� ts6 Wo L ,8 v 3 1 program called SOAPS4 (SOAP84 is an acronym that stands for Signal Operations Analysis Program) . This program, developed t; through the assistance of the Federal Highway Administration, is capable of providing a detailed analysis and optimization of the operation of individual signalized intersections, whether they are operating in an undersaturated or oversaturated condition. The program is sensitive to approach lane configuration and utilization, observed saturation flow rates, traffic volumes, peak flow rates, lost time and effective green time, type of controller, pedestrian crossing time requirements, phasing and phase sequencing. The program is capable of providing Information on green time requirements, optimum signal timing, degree of saturation (by approach movement and also for the intersection as a whole) , average vehicle delay, percent stopped vehicles, estimated total fuel consumption, and estimated annual operating costs for approaching vehicles. A detailed discussion of the methodology underlying this procedure is contained in a ( report entitled, fig0g1 Q02CAtiLM 80$1y9iM EAQhAQ2L MQC2G2M2ut2C ( Ygr_N .QOs which was published by the Federal Highway Administration, January 1985. For the purposes of this analysis, the assumed relationship between the calculated volume/capacity ratio for the intersection and the associated LOS is given in Table 2. All LOS analyses presented in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures described above. For each intersection, these analyses estimate the overall intersection LOS during the peak. hour flow of the pm peak hour. Copies of ff the analysis outputs are contained in the appendix. 1�# P ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION-ENGINEERING &PLANNING, INC. Page 4 3 til''tYT 2 �r;*'f._.9.v+.. . n ....,-.�'€.-Yr weo w•.,a .. � 4V 1. �'. 't _.. «. r � , Table 1 .. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS ONS (SIGNALIZED INTERFECTYONS) Level of eerv--ice Traffic Flow Characteristics A Average overall travel speeds of 30 mph or more. Free-flowing with no congestion. No signal cycle failures. 8 Average overall travel speeds of 25-30 mph. Very few signal cycle failures and little or no congestion. C Average+ overall travel speeds of 20-25 mph. Occasional signal cycle failures and associated congestion. D Average overall travel speeds of 15-20 mph. Frequent signal cycle failures and associated congestion. E Average overall travel speeds of about 15 mph. k,v Unstable flow which includes almost continuous signal cycle failures and backups on approaches to the intersections. This represents the theoretical capacity of the facility. F Forced flow, with average overall travel speeds of below 15 mph Continuous signal cycle failure with backup on approaches going through upstream intersections in some cases. Note: A signal cycle failure is considered to occur when } one or more vehicles are forced to wait through more than one green signal indication for a particular approach. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATIONENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 5 A i 5 - Table 2 �_. CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS a Stopped LOS Delay eer yehiicla (sec. ) A <5.0 H 5. 1 - 15.0 C 15. 1 - 25.0 D 25. 1 - 40.0 E 40. 1 - 60.0 F >60.0 Table 3 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS lataCEE=2a L0§ IMEM QgLax Pacific Highway and Durham Road C 23.82 SEC Durham Road and Summerfield A 12.92 SEC [ TRIP GENERATION Estimating the number of vehicle trip ends that will be generated by the proposed development is of prime importance to the City of Tigard and to Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) . Two basic procedures are available to traffic engineers for estimating the number of driveway vehicle trips generated by a proposed by not -yet -existing developments 1. Apply averages observed through field studies conducted by other similar facilities located throughout the United States. A number of sources are available for this information, Including ICLR QgnSC&tj21 "SUMAL SjCd gdLtL2Mj, which is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); and summary trip generation reports prepared by the California -Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, and other public transportation agencies. All of these sources provide excellent guidance in estimating the trip generation rates for various land uses, but obviously do not take In to account the effects of local conditions and unique characteristics of the proposed land use. 2. Observe through field studies the actual trip generation F characteristics of other similar and existing developments within the local area. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 6 tr tm " Only procedure one above was used in the development of this report. Table 4 below,identifies the expected number of vehicle �- trip ends to be generated by this proposed development on both a C , daily and pm peak hour basis. Table 4 PROJECTED TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Generated Trips (B) -------------------------- Size of ---P_M_ Peak-Hour--------- Land Use Land Use (GSF) (A) Daily Total In Out -------- --------- -------- ------ ----- ----- Commercial 177,600 10,901 984 477 507 is NET ADDITIONAL TRIP ENDS GENERATED BY THE SITE (C) 6,540 390 286 304 ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES& A. GSF gross square feet B. Includes both inbound and outbound trips _t C. Assumes that 40 percent of the trips attracted to the commercial retail represent drop-in trips by vehicles that are already on the adjacent road system. Also assumes that all �3remaining new and diverted vehicle trips are new to the site. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that ogpg of the commercial-related person trips will be made by mass transit, and that only 10 percent of the multi-family related person trips will be made by mass transit. This assumption ignores the Metropolitan Service District's most recent projection that 4-6 { u ' percent of all home based person trips for purposes unrelated to work will be made by transit. Therefore, this assumption tends - to-- cause - the analysis to reflect a worst-case condition, and overestimate the traffic impacts associated with this development. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution of generated trips onto the roadway system { within the site area was determined by.reviewing the project market area and the distribution of existing traffic in the area. s } ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS It was determined by the above and field investigation that the � - following scenarios would be reviewed: Scenario 1. The development would have three (3) right turn in and out driveways from and to Pacific Highway, (1) right turn in and out driveway on Durham Road and a full access at the Summerfield intersection, additional access points on 113th ave. CScenario 2. The development would have Two (2) right turn in and out driveways from and to Pacific Highway, and a full access at the Summerfield intersection, additional access points on 113th ave. Scenario 3. The development would have one (1) right turn in and out driveway from and to Pacific Highway, and a full access at the Summerfield intersection, additional access points on 113th ave. DISCUSSION OF SCENARIOS TABLE t SCENARIO SUMMARY smmsssas:ssss::msmmsammssmms:ssssrsasassssmmaesssszssassaszssssasassas SCLAARIO 1 AM PM LOS LOS ssssssssss:oss:mmsasasas.mmassasssaasssass::ssaxmmassssmmsssasassas: PACIFIC HIGHWAY & DURHAM ROAD A B DURHAM AND SUMMERFIELD A C (except left turn E) (UNSIGNALIZED) DURHAM AND SUMMERFIELD A A (SIGNALIZED) s.as..sass.asss:a.:.:xsmmmm:saamm.ssammmmmmsma::s::ease:..ssmmmm:.smmmm..= SCENARIO 2 PACIFIC HIGHWAY & DURHAM ROAD A C DURHAM AND SUMMERFIELD A A �Y. ssssssssssssmassmmsssss:amm.sssssasss.sasssssssasasassassaassammsss SCENARIO 3 CPACIFIC HIGHWAY & DURHAM ROAD A C DURHAM AND SUMMERFIELD A A �' Y ssssasssssammassssssssaasasssrasms=aoxas=aasaaassxasascaaaasszasaa c ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 6 _ . j a. SCENARIO 1 This scenario would allow the commercial development multiple access points from and to Pacific Highway and full access from Durham Road. { The impact of this scenario is minimal due to the multitude of I driveways along Pacific Highway. The access points would operate as right turns in and out since Pacific Highway is a limited access roadway at this point and left turns are not permitted. The first access point on Durham Road would also operate as a right turn in and out driveway due to the concrete median that exists in Durham Road at this point. The full access driveway on Durham Road at Summerfield would operate at LOS C as an unsignalized intersection ,except for the left turn out of the Albertsons center. This left turn movement would operate at LOS of E with an average delay of 155.6 seconds and a average Queue of 8 vehicles. This amount of delay would cause congestion and diversion of exiting traffic to other access points. This is not a desirable condition for any access point, regardless of type of land use involved. This magnitude of delay would meet warrant 10 - peak hour delay as outlined by the addendum to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, January 1986. 1. Total delay for side street - 27.6 vehicle hours. , 2. Total side street approach > 150 vehicles per hour s 326 vehicles. 3. Total entering volume 1327 which exceeds the warrant of 800 ~' vehicles entering. By signalizing the inte-section and adding left turn lanes,the ( LOS increases to LOS during the pm peak hour. The access points along 113th Ave would have little or no traffic except for commercial vehicles coming to serve the development. The 113th Ave area is still largely undeveloped land with few houses. SCENARIO 2 This alternative reduces the number of driveways on Pacific Highway and allows for a full intersection access point onto Durham Road. This scenario would provide 2 right turn in and out driveways on Pacific Highway and the full access point at Summerfield and Durham Road. The access points along 133rd would stay the same. �- This scenario would allow the Pacific Highway and Durham .; intersection,and the Durham and Summerfield intersection to ti operate at an acceptable LOS during the pm peak hour. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 9 SCENARIO 3 This alternative is the same as scenario 2 except that the - development would have one access onto Pacific Highway at the extreme south property line. The requirements for access with w this scenario would be the same as Scenario 2 and would not. have an appreciable decrease in the LLS of either intersection. CONCLUS I ONS 1. The existing intersections currently operate at a Level of Service C or better. ` f < 2. The full access driveway at Summerfield and Durham Road meets Warrant 10 - Peak Hour delay for the installation of a traffic signal for the side street with Scenario 1. All additional analyzes considered the installation of a traffic signal at this location. 3. Any of the scenarios reviewed would provide adequate access to the site. 4. Based on the above, it was determined that Scenario # 2 would provide the best internal traffic circulation and be the least detriment to the overall operation of Pacific Highway or Durham Road. Haled on the results of the traffic impact analysis described in this report, it is concluded that the Commercial development can be achieved with minimal impact on the existing street system and traffic flow patterns. To ensure the safe and efficient movement of traffic and . �F pedestrians within the area, the following traffic operational Improvements are recommended. 1) A traffic signal be installed on Durham Road at the rv- Summerfield intersection. 2) Durham Road be improved with 2 eastbound lanes between Pacific Highway and the 113th Ave intersection, with 100' left turn pockets at the Summerfield intersection east and west bound. ; ` 3) Two (2) right turn in and right turn out driveways be allowed on Pacific Highnay, (one) 1 driveway located rl approximately 360 feet south of Durham Road and (one) 1 -i-u driveway located at the south property line ' approximately 19100 feet south of Durham Road. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 10 4) The main access point into the development ora Durham Road be made 40' wide to provide a separate left turn lane and one (1) through and right turn lane. The stacking distance required for the access approach is a minimum of 100 feet as shown by the Soap64 Analysis. i . i r1 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. Page 11 -13 V1, Vom .«. *autiaa aoaodow I ! �A ! i ( I ! 3 it t — i ~ 4 II I 2 / \\``..... ['44 `\ 44 Z O r + m o ul � x o �- = x a a O Z IC Us ou URI a. - wo (tp i iso" .Z N m a3 A L N 1►d a ts� `► to �� of 173 z �s LL! z �`. _ cs LLJ j m D Cl W 0 M Y 0 Ll = W z V) I z D <C w o n z W o W C3 Lli 3 LLI z Z A ? a X V I o o a o 0 0 LAI r.> 4n ,�• r� cv 133A NI 30N'd1S I CI � ���� -In �' k�:?.� -..4 _•4. ...Sv- _:+�,5. - vn3u.F�''.7c. .'�-"..7 x� ��.... '-Ad.uat a. L.t d W F J 1 W D � z f. U z (f) LL1 n n- Z � a �s w __- O uj I W Z r G G 0 O G G � t[3 d- tf} tV •- 133J NI 30NViS I C] ,;C�c .C> _ _ +Y..- _ _ ".�. .'J r._»^IYNm.'.Yt•�4•:.wPS3Y�5z4:�1'.��5 cc 1' ¢ w a 2 uja o Q x ac 0 tj IN) 96 -91 a a � j e L7, 'J Yd 169 (rJ N ttJ01 N LU rc W U. 4c" a m o Q Q Za d Z LLI P 4 N N c ac x {{ a o t,..a_ r-- SN x �„ 4 01u 6Q 9 � e C \ \ _ @ $ � co A § k cc s w W < IL W co\ a . � . Ic ■ � < ■ � ■ � ! . £ (\ [\ e � [ § _ _ _ 2 a �� _ ■ / g �§■ �■■ fig$ 91f _ 9 .1 t 3 ©� � . ■& ■ . ■ � x . . « z , . d� \ . . . . . . a�.� . . . . . _. . . . N — Cf) 2 W V C to ' LL x a m CC C ® Lu ui —2 a Z = WQ! i- W F- K a V X d . . G � 1 O fi [ , o _ and _s 3 cos . K—, (� x cm t LLI N IL W =x H H N W �y Q cc Z ft D i 1 Gf Llt n ........... r N I� "a ;J r2f4Cr,J J fs) m sr tory a; - _ x . P r.� ^OIBMCC I ATEX)i TFRANSP-©RTAT I ON TEGHN Y CAL_ AP'P'END T X i 741- C r f .r 4 f r COP1fEII�T ,ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION:ENGINEERING & R11G, I�IC 4 F C, � P--:: Y.. .. �°• �w Gam" �?, `- � x` '�'r�i!-�t_.,�t��u t.� ,.x.Y.s#,'�'` _ ._ir.� t,k '�4 A i ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING AND PLANNING ' DATE OF C01117:6-18-86 TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY MANUAL LOCATION:DURHAN AND HN7 99 DIRECTION OF TRAVELNORTH AND SOUTH BOUND, EAST80UND #titt#t##tt#i+tt+tttti##ttttit#tttttittt+t+t+ttttttttttt+tiiitt#iiitttlittttitHtttfNfftitit#tittfttttt#tttiittt N E N N N S E N E S N S t # FRON + FRON + FROM # FROM + + TINE TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO # TOTAL # NORTH* EAST # NEST # SOUeH# CK f E N N N S N N E S E S N # + + + # #TOTAL t �e.�Y +#+tltt##++tt+ttt++t+t##i+++#itt+ii#ff#tftN#tii#tttttti+#ffft#fi#ttft+fittfittitttiittt#titftf#t+tt#+ttNfftt#+tff AN f f # t # # # 6:00-7e00 63 29 2 4 249 546 14 7 39 139 6 22 + 1122 # 314 # 82 + 17 # 709 t 1122 # 7:00-8:00 93 19 5 2 479 831 81 It 60 169 9 26 4 1805 + 577 + 160 # 22 + 1046 + 1805 + # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0t # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # t 0 + 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # a 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # f 0 + 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # Ot t 0 # 0 # 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 # PN PEAK # # # t # f # U00-5:00 196 137 21 34 841 647 162 143 239 76 40 92 # 2620 0 1050 + 538 + 217 + 815 # 2620 + 500-6:00 189 131 8 23 722 575 79 121 221 93 40 31 # 2233 # 919 # "431 # 184 t 199 f 2233 # # 0 + 0 # 0t 0 # 0 # 0 # # 0 # 0t 0 # 0 # 0 # 0f # 0i 0i 0 # 0 # Q # 04 # 0f 0 # 0 + 0 # 0 # 0 # + 0 # 0 # 0 + 0 + Ot Of + 0f 0 # 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 # + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + # 0 + 0 + 0 # 0 # 0 + 0 + # Oc 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 + t 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 + 0 + # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0t t 0 # 0 # 0 # 0 # 0f Of Nf################+#fi####i##+###t###+#####fit#t##+ti#t#####ft#f###+#++#t#t##if#####t####+###f#t#+###f##i#####tt#24 NR TOT 533 316 36 63 2291 2601 336 282 559 497 95 171 f 7780 f 2860 f 1211 # 440 + 3269 + 7780 f # # a # # t # [, AST 613 363 41 72 2635 2991 386 324 643 572 109 197 # 8947 # 3289 # 1393 + 506 # 3759 f 8947 + ADT FACTO1.15 # f t f + + # AN PK NR 156 48 7 6 728 1379 95 18 99 328 15 48 f 2927 # 891 f 242 + 39 # 1755 1 2927 f PN PK NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Of Of Ot 0 # Of 0 # Of [6 AN 7 726 156 PN 0 0 0 R T L R T L 6 L R 48 0 L R 0 18 T T 95 0 T T 0 Ell15 p L 99 0 R L 0 I. T R L T R i 48 1379 328 0 0 0 SOAP INPUT ECH 0 NO. CARD IDA B NOT N& SOT SOL EDT EDL NOT NBL COMMENT -- 24 1 a 1 2 NOT NK SOT SOL 07 ESL N@T VOL p 25 1DESIN 0 1700 1000 60 5 30 .95 .5 PACIFIC HNY AND DURHAN RDi 26 i tfftf}tttffa}}}tfaf#}f#tt}ftf}}tfatttt#}ff}tf}t}f}}t ; �_. 21 1 28 S ; 29 1 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ; 30 1 16016 ON HOMES FERRY ROAD ; 31 1 LAKE OSNESO OREGON ; 32 1 I 33 1 TI6ARD ALOERSTONS ; 34 1 I 3S i aaa}attattttttttt}tt}tt}a}}}}}}tta}t+}t}tt}}ta##tt} i 36 1 # 1 2 NOT NOL SOT SOL EST Ek NOT NOL i 37 ICONTROL 60 1700 0 90 90 ; 36 IVOLUME 60 1700 647 92062 188 177 34162 239 i 39 SCAPACITY60 1700 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 i s' 40 ILEFT 2 2 2 2 ENNS 41 INEADNAY 3.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 i 42 1 TtN n 60 1700 5 2 5 2 2 0 2 5 I W MATE ... EASTBOUND LEFT. TRUCK FACTOR ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST. 43 ISERUENCE L?T EN i w 44 ITADLE 4 7 19 22 31 33 i 45 IRON 1 6/26 B PH EXISTING GOND 1 NO. CARD ID A D NOT NBL SOT SOL EDT EBL MIT VK COMMENT #}a NARNING: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS IGNORED KITH RESTRICTIVE LEFT TURNS IN THE NORTHMIOUND LEM DIRECTION. He YARNING: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE 16 IGNORED KITH RESTRICTIVE 4 LEFT TURNS IN TUE SOUTAOOSNID LEFT. DIRECTION. !at UARNINSs LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS IGNORED KITH RESTRICTIVE � LEFT TURNS IN THE EASTBOUND LEFT. DIRECTION. tta NARNINS: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS IGNORED PITH RESTRICTIVE LEFT?URNS IN THE NESTi01NID LEFT DIRECTION. 5 I .: . I- a '; '�,.'s; • < SI6NAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKA6E } PAGE - 6 t L TABLE NO. 4 CALCULATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VEHICLES PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) ##Off#if#fif#i#t##i;t#f##ftSi#}f#i###t##i}}Sift##i##i}t##i#}tiff##f#Ht#t##tfiif#ifit#t + )VOL + TIME + 1 - NBT + 2 - NBL # 3 - SBTf 4 - SBL + 5 - EBT + 6 - EBL + 7 - NB7 + 0 - MIL # ttft#itftitf#i#}}i}i}}ifffti###}tit##i}#ff#tf#ifMUM#f of4*istt#itffft#t###fii#i#tits#f;ttttfti##t## f 1 i 1700 # 666.410 f 93.104 # 687.860 + 190.256 + 179.124 # 34.000 # 163.944 i 246.170 + fifti}#it{##ii##}}#t}i}i}i#i}iti#at}tif{fi#f#i#i!i#ifioff ii#ifffifii#tti#fit##tti#i#ii#tiiffi#fii+f#iif TABLE NO. 7 CALCULATED SATURATION FLOWS *VEHICLES PER 60 MINUTES OF GREEN TIME) it#ift#fii#ffiff##fi#}i#}if#fiiiit}ifiii#t!#ffff#i#f###iHtiHt##i#fit#ilii};ai}iH###f ii#siif}}+i#f K# # ISATiTIME + 1 -NITS 2 - NBLf 3 - SBTf 4 - SBL + 5 - EBT * 6 - EBL + 7 - MI7 + 8 - NBL + i*sii}tats###t#iii#ifiii#f#it!#ffif####i#i##}###f##i}i}t}tf#fi#ifsti#i##fi###ifi##isi#f Hitiifitfi#i#it f 1 + 1700 # 3272.727 + 1440.000 # 3272.727 # 1440.000 # 1636.364 + 1440.000 s 1636.364 # 2800.000 + ftafii#iiit#*#i##f#f ifiaiif#i#st#fi###ftaii###tiiifttt#t#iia*ilii}Stift##tfi}fitffai#!ti#titsiifiai;}ift TABLE NO. 19 { LEFT TURN SATURATION FLOW BASED ON OPPOSING THRU VOLUME IPE9 60 MINUTE PERIOD) is#4#4f0a4iita#i#48fti#tfifiaftsait#iftftif##if#aat!!}iii#i#illi#i#iiift#iiiiiffiif#f#iif*flfaaatifaftf #LFTSAT# TIME # 1 - NIT i 2 - NIL + 3 - SOT t 4 - GBL # S - EBT f 6 - EBL + 7 - NIT # 8 - NIL + }taf;ifiif#iia}iiffifftiitii}iasifii}t}ttt*iiia#iii####i#iii#iifi##ia#t}tititft#!#i#f#fiiiiifaaififilii } 1 + 1700 + .000 + 423.337 + .000 # 577.314 f .000 + 1157.936 • .000 # 2274.445 + itiit#ifiii#iStati##tifiaeiifififta#ti#anti###iii#f!#fist#citta#ffafffi#ifitii}atf#ii#iiaf#stfffiaitaf TABLE NO. 22 CRITICAL VOLUME SATURATION FLOW RATIOS FOR EACH PHASE BASED ON ADJUSTED VOLUMES iif#}ia#i#fifi;iiatiiifiiiiiii;ttiits}taiififf#ilii###itaifi*afiiifatitaiaatift#t ( #CRITY # TINE # PHASE 1 # PHASE 2 + PHASE 3 + PHASE 4 # PHASE S # PHASE 6 # iifiaia}##}}}#ai*iisiafaifa#fiitiif#tttiff##tiiaf###}}afisaitiasfitatifatiaf"M f 1 # 1700 # .065 # .067 + .204 i .109 # .100 a .000 + ffiiffaitisfffiiaifiiitisai#t#i►Safitaiitia##i#tits}iifaaaiiaaa#titiaaitiai;fatii TABLE NO. 31 CALCULATED EFFECTIVE GREENICYCLE RATIO FOR EACH MOVEMENT (INCLUDING LEFT TURN RELEASE ADJUSTMENT) fitiii#facia#ftifii#tiifffiifiatiiffit+iNfi#faiaffift!#f#tt#ififfHiififiaa;#aiffifNffifistiN#ii+Hf , f #LAMDA + TIME + 1 - NBT + 2 - NIL + 3 - SIT # 4 -SBL # S - EST + 6 - EBL # 7 -NIT # B - NBL # E fafift#fiffififiiiifaiaftitif#tail###a#a#f#ififi#fiif#fitiifii;ff+ifififsi;iiiftfff}##ii#ifiiff#iiifiii # 1 # 1700 + .315 + .100 # .420 + .204 + .169 # .169 # .iSS + .155 '► H;itfaffiii+N#fitiiittiNt!#}aft#ftiiifi#ifiii#if#ffif4ifi##faiifaiiiiti#iaif#fi}fiiifaiiiifiiifi;fta TABLE NO. 33 CALCULATED DEGREE OF SATURATION t VOLUME/CAPACITY 1 ( IF I = 999.999, NO GREEN TINE) tiiafiit#ifff#f#iii}fftti#3f}i#Sit#if#Ntitttiii#i###f#ffitf}}fififi#itf#tfitif#f##til#iftiftif#fiffff# + I # TIME # 1 - NBT # 2 - NHL # 3 - SIT + 4 - SBL # 5 - EDT S 6 - EDL # 7 - METS B - WBL # PIZ tfff#t#ai#f##itf}{;{f#ifiii*#{###ftf}tiff*#itff#t##if##f#if#f#fi#t###{}#t}}{fai/f#cif##iff##ff#iafif;a# + 1 # 1700 # .645 # .646 # .646 # .646 # .646 + .139 # .646 # .551 + • i#ifitt�titf##tf�ft;}###i!•ff;i#f##tft#tif#*#f;###f;}#if if####tttif#it;}taia{i#ittt#tttt#####fits#t#;## ■ ■ t 0PE ■ ■ I10 ■ ■ A N A L Y 5 1 S P ■ CK ■ ■ E > PAGE - 7 \< L ■ F7 IUa ■ CHECK (PER # e■eEK@G ?■ /\ � -----_�__---�-�- ---� \ « PERIOD ■anOM SOUTeOND ■ate WErea§ . NO. |!#_ VOL_ U � VOL, C--V--CAP --VOL CAP /\ 1 R# e. 14■ . 1". s4 », 244. 246 447 -��-____------ \\ | . �\ � � � |\ � ) \ � • � '-< SI6NAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKA6E > PAGE - 8 { 1GN AND EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTROLLER SERUENCE LOST TINE SPECIFIED INTERSECTION NAME )UNI NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL N/S Ell PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL PACIFIC MY AND DURHAM RD 1: 6/26 8 PH EXISTING GOND ACTUATED NIA L?T EN 5 3.5 14.0 95.0! MEASURES Of EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EIC FUEL EIC LEFT MAXIMUM V/C LEFT TURN TREATMENT lN1VFlMS IVEM-HRS) (1) (SAL) IVEH) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CVC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 NB THRU : 5.19 86.0 9.B4 14.3 .65 ?m XXXI LEFT : 1.30 96.2 1.67 .0 2.2 .65 REST .0 lilt ???? 69 THRU s 5.42 79.6 10.32 17.7 .65 ???? XVII LEFT : 2.03 91.7 2.96 .0 4.4 .65 REST .0 sill ???? EB TWO : 2.03 93.3 2.69 4.2 .65 XXXX LEFT s .31 83.1 .47 .0 .7 .14 REST .0 lilt a THRU : 1.92 93.9 2.69 3.8 .65 XXXX LEFT : 2.57 92.4 3.82 .0 5.7 .55 REST .0 lilt I N E A 6 0 A E 5 OF EFFECTIVENESS SI6NAL T I N I N 6 ANALYSISs DELAY STOPS EX. FUEL EX. LEFT MAXIMUM VIC ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PERIOD s IYEH-HRR) W IGAL) (YEN) QUEUE RATIO ISEC) NO. ISEC) (1) (1) 11) (1) (1) (1) 1700-1800: 20.75 06.2 33.66 .0 17.7 ~ .65 - .0 N/A 90.0: 13.9 10.4 35.4 20.0 19.4 suMNARY s 20.75 B6.2 33.66 .0 17.7 .65 TIMING WM- ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. r ?x.15 a r E = Z seec,5 Le S 5 1985 HISHVAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNINS ANALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD ALBERSTONS INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HISITYAY AND DURHAM ROAD DESIGN DAY: EXISTING AM PEAK ------------6EWORY No. of No. of No. of No. of Na. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Tb,klt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 1 0 0 1 0 M8 1 1 0 0 1 0 NB 1 0 2 0 1 0 SB 1 0 1 1 0 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------_----------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 34 143 40 217 MB 239 162 131 536 NB 92 646 93 833 SB ISO 841 21 1050 f LANE HISTRINUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH MITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) yo LT � -Total No. of Equiv. ThruVol. In Vol. In fipposiay ERUIV Voluse Lanes On Voluse Vehicles LT+iH Ea. Of The Volm PCElt Vlt PCE's (TWT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH lane Reuining (qb) lane � Lanes - 162 1.1 34 37.4 143 180.4 1 180 0 0 ISO 143 1.1 239 262.9 162 424.9 1 425 0 0 425 862 4 92 368 648 1016 2 508 140 232 508 648 3 188 564 862 1426 2 113 149 337 713 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 i up 5 fi CALCULATIONS OF STATUS i EN LT- 34 N! LT= 92 !�,d N9 THM. 162 9 THIRT• 431 Sw 196 SUN= 523 N8 LT- 239 a LT= 188 . TWT- 180 NB TWT= 324 M 419SUM= 512 1(AXIMIMI = 942 LOS B GK OF CRITICAL VOLUMES _ R3gnETurn`Check OK 19BS HISITYAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD ALBERSTONS INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HISHNAY AND DURHAM ROAD DESIGN DAY: EIISTIN6S AM PEAK GEOMMY jjNo. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of t Lt. Lt.k1h. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,kLt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 1 0 1 I 0 0 t 0 � = a C 2 0 1 G SB 1 0 1 1 a TRAFFIC VOLUNES Left Right 4 Turn Thru Turn 9 Total I 02 11 22 60 8i 19 160 i 26 8047 32 93 479 189 iS77 i 5 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A tRiLTILANE APPROACH PITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET)N LT Total No. of Vo EBUIVVolvo Lanes On Opposing roach VolvoPCE1t Vlt PCE's {TN+RT! Total App (vpb) 81 1.1 _ 2 2.2 It 13.2 1 It 1.1 60 b6 BI 141 Y 26 S2 832 884 484 2 2 832 4 93 372 484 856 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 Epp -799 3 y eoo -149 4 1000 i op S f LL CALMATIONS OF STATUS E8 LT= 2 NB LT26 = w V1 TNftRT= 81 SB Tti4RT= 242 StBf= f13 Son 260 NB LT= 60 SB LT= 93 ® _ 13 NB THkRT= 41b { bNts 73 PAR 504 NAIINBBI StM(OF CRITICAL VOLUNcS= 592 LOS = A Ri t Torn Check OK f 1985 HIGHNAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: T16ARD ALDERSTONS INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HIGHNAY AND DURHAM ROAD KS16N DAY: SCENARIO I AN PEAK No. of No. at No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.1Th. Thru Rt.11h. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 0 1 0 0 1 0 YD 1 1 0 0 1 0 NH 1 0 2 0 1 0 98 1 0 1 1 0 0 -----------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES------------- ----------_.�_ Left Right Turn Thru Tura Total ED 2 27 9 38 NB 82 95 37 214 ND 26 849 189 1064 S8 117 479 5 601 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED Lff71THRU LANES ON A M 71LANE APPROACH N11H PEIUiISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) Vo .� LT� Total � No. of ~Equiv.N Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposigg EBUIV Valve Lanes On Volute Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volue PCElt VIt PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Regaining .. > (rPh) Lane Lues - 95 1.1 2 2.2 27 29.2 1 29 0 0 29 27 1.1 82 90.2 9s 185.2 1 185 0 0 185 484 2 26 52 849 901 2 451 399 425 451 849 4 117 468 484 952 2 476 8 125 476 PCE Lookup Table 8 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 i up S CULATIONS OF STATUS ' 0 LT■ 2 N8 LT= 26 a 1HhRT= 95 SD THkRT- 242 ' SUN= 97 SUM= 268 ti` a LT= 82 SB LT= 117 \ZLTH&RT= 29 NB TH&RT= 425 SUM= 111 SUIT: 542 NAXINUN SUN 8F CRITICAL VOLINES= 633 LOS = A Rift,Turn Check OK 1985 HIMMY CAPACITY PROCEDURE EDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD ALDERSTONS INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HISHNAY AND DUMN ROAD DESIGN DAY: SCENARIO 1 PH PEAK ----SEONETRr No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.ETh. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 0 1 0 0 1 0 YB ! 10 0 1 0 N8 1 0 2 0 1 0 [� SD i 0 1 1 0 0 1 s '-»--~--»-----TRAFFIC VOLIN ES- -----_ Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total k ED 34 179 40 253 NB 135 216 161 512 NB 109 704 ^6 909 SB 229 841 21 1091 LANE DISTRIDUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LADS {OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) vo -»-»~!T»» Total No. of Equi v. Thru» Vol. In Vol. In Opposing ESUIV Values Lanes On Values Vehicles LT+TH Es. Of The x Value PCElt Vlt PCE•s ITH+RT1 Total Approsch Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Retaining y Irph! lane Lanes 216 2 34 &B 179 247 1 247 0 _» 0 »N 247 179 1.1 135 148.5 216 364.5 1 365 0 0 365 862 4 109 436 704 1140 2 570 134 243 570 g 704 3 229 687 862 1549 2 775 Be 317 773 3 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -399 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 1 oP 5 TIONS OF STATUS -------•_ EB LT= 34 NB LT= 109 4„ ,Vl THIRT= 216 68 TH&RT= 431 SI!!� 250SQL= 540 YD LT= 135 S8 LT= 229 9 I'm 247 ND THkRT= 352 362 Off SQL= 581 1d1><INQI StMt OF CRITICAL VOLUTES= 963 LOS': 8 1485 NISNNNIY CAPACITY PmDURE PLANNING tV1ALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD ALDERSTONS INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HISHMAY AND DOW ROAD DESIGN DAY: SCENARIO 2 AN PEAK ONETRY -- --_ No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.6Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,tLt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes E8 0 1 0 0 1 0 IND 1 1 0 0 1 0 ND 1 0 2 0 1 0 SO 1 0 1 1 0 0 ----•------TRAFFIC VOLIKS---------------------------- k Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total E8 2 27 4 38 N8 82 9S 37 214 N8 26 844 184 1054 a 117 474 5 601 LANE OISTRIDUTION FOR SHARED LEF t/THRU LAMES ON A NULTILANF APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIOWL NORKSHEET) Vo �---- LT Total No. of NEquiv.M ThruN~Vol. In Val. In Opposing EdUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volvo PCElt Vlt PCE'm (7H+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining lvph) Lane Lanes 95 1.1 2 2.2 27 24.2 1 24 0 0 29 27 1.1 82 40.2 95 185.2 1 185 0 0 185 484 2 26 52 844 896 2 448 346 422 448 844 4 117 468 484 452 2 476 6 125 476 PCE Lookup Table 0 -194 1.t 200 -549 2 600 -799 3 900 -999 4 1000 & up 5 CULATIONS OF STATUS " ES ITS 2 ND LT= 26 IA TN1RT= 95 9 TH&RTu 242 SUM=• 97 SUM= 268 118 L7= 82 8 LT= 117 k Two 29 0 TH&RT= 422 Sm- 111 SUM= 539 MAXI1RHI StNf OF CRITICAL VOLLI ES= 650 LOS = A r Rst Turn Check. KC t 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD AUERSTONS 1, INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND DURHAM ROAD DESIGN DAY: SCENARIO 2 PM PEM( GEOMETRY No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.4Th. Tura Rt.ATh. Rt. Rt,Th,tLt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes lanes Lanes EB 0 1 0 0 1 0 N8 1 1 0 0 1 0 NB 1 0 2 0 1 0 SB 1 0 1 1 0 0 --TRAFFIC VOLUNES-------- - ----- Left Right Tarn Thru Turn Total ' EI 34 179 40 253 M8 345 216 161 722 NB 135 704 96 935 SB 229 841 ?i 1091 LANE BISTRIgUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSNEET) VaLT ~Total No. of Equi r.�fhra Vol. In Vol.-Ino Opposing EQUIV Volume Lanes On Voluee Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Vale" PCElt Vlt PCE's fTH+RTI Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining fyphl Lane Lanes 216 2 34 68 179 247 1 247 0 0 247 L 179 1.1 345 379.5 216 595.5 1 596 0 0 596 862 4 135 540 704 1244 2 622 82 217 622 704 3 229 a? 862 1549 2 775 BB 317 775 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 r 600 -799 3 h} 800 -999 4 1000 ! up 5 FIR CALCULATIONS OF STATUS 0 LT- 34 NB LTa 135 WB TNN3T- 216 SB THIAT= 431 SUM= 250 SUN= 566 r NB LT- 345 SB LT- 229 S EB TH&RT- 247 NB TH&RT- 352 SUN- 592 SUN= 561 a. lkiXINUN'SUM OF.CRITICM. VOLUMES- 1173 LOS - C Right,Turn Check DIC :ty_ } 1985 HIGHKAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD ALBERSTONS INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HISHNAY AND BUM ROAD DESIGN DAY: SCENARIO 3 AN PEAK --SEDNETRY - ----'--' No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Na. of Lt. U.M. Thru Rt.ETh. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 1 0 0 1 0 NB I 1 0 0 1 0 NB 1 O 2 0 1 0 SB 1 0 1 1 0 0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Left Right Turn Thru Tern Total EB 2 27 9 36 NB 82 95 50 227 NB 26 831 201 1058 SB 117 479 S 601 LANE BISTRIMION FOR SHARED LEFTl1HRU LAS ON A NULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In B)ppa;isq EBUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (THAT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Reasining MLane �— lanes 95 1.1 2 2.2 27 29.2 1 29 0 0 29 C 27 1.1 82 90.2 95 185.2 1 165 0 0 185 s i 484 2 26 52 831 883 2 442 390 416 442 831 4 117 468 464 952 2 476 6 125 476 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 [ 200-599 2 t Y 600 -799 3 ` 800-994 4 1000 i up 5 -- -----CA CULATIONS OF STATUS---- EB LT- 2 NB LT- 26 T 118 ""T- 95 SB T%RT- 242 SIO(- 97 SUM= 266 NB LT- 82 SB LT- 117 w ED THiRT- 29 NB TH&RT- 416 SISI= 111 SUK- 533` i NA3SIINR4 SUM OF CRITICAL VOLU ES- 64+4 LOS -A a' Ih t Turn-Check OK' 1 1985 HISHNAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNINS ANALYSIS PROSECT: TISARD ALYERSTONS tINTERSECTION: PACIFIC RIMY AND DURHAM ROAD DESIGN DAY: SCENARIO 3 PM PEAK ONETRY ---No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.6Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,6Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes E8 0 1 0 0 1 0 N8 1 1 0 0 I 0 NB 1 0 2 0 1 0 S8 1 0 1 1 0 0 L ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUNES --- Left Right Tare Thru Turn Total E8 34 179 40 253 M8 345 233 218 796 a 92 647 135 874 S8 229 841 21 1091 LANE DISTP.I8UTION FOR SNARED LEFT/T)DtU LANES ON A NULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NOM(SHEET) t.; Vo - -- LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru~~Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EBUIV Voluse Lanes On Voluse Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volaae PCEIt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT4TH Lane Resaining �.R-- #vphl � - Lane lanes 233 2 34 68 179 247 1 247 0 0 247 179 1.1 345 379.5 233 612.5 1 613 O 0 613 I 862 4 92 368 647 1015 2 508 140 232 508 647 3 229 687 862 1549 2 775 Be 317 775 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -994 4 1040 i up 5 El TIONS OF STATUS E8 LT- 34 N8 LT- 92 N8 = 233 S8 TWn 431 q SUM= 267 SUN• 523 N8 LT= 345 SO LT= 229 D TORT= 247 NB TH6RT= 324 A 592 SUNz 553 'NAXINUN SUN OF-CRITICAL VOLUMES= 1145 LOS = C Right Turn.Check DK tY 95 HCA CHAPTER 10 : UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (RAGE 1 of 2) TE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:06:25 TIGARD ALHERSONS lExv.-�nWE-# yM r„y�ygM §hjkw A"* ti. _;.ST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= ii KEY: A- -B t _ C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP -PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH -MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES _MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANEa Y MINOR STREET LANES t APPROACH: Cl SUMMERFIELS SHARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES iLARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO ,RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJORS NO A SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) "APPROACH A: WESTBND B: EASTBND C: SUMMERFIELS LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,.RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 L_,'PROACH A: WESTBND B: EASTBND C: SUMMERFIELS LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT OLUME O 135 5 17 369 0 6 O 25 HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 'FADJ VOLUME 0 150 6 19 409 0 7 O 28 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 'ASS CAR/HR 0 21 7 O 31 TER 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:SUMMERFIELS . ONFLICTING FLOWS 150 :_CRITICAL GAPS 5.0 APACITY 1047 € CTUAL CAPACITY 1047 .'CTEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:EASTBND ONFLICTING FLOWS 150 'C_RITICAL GAPS 4.5 APAC I TY 1182 4APACITY USED 2% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 CTUAL CAPACITY 1192 cv says 2)- D - 3 APPROACHES HCM CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZE PAGE 2 o tW --.DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:06:25 � TIGARD ALBERSONS l STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:SUMMERFIELS CONFLICTING FLOWS 581 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 APACITY 490 CTUAL CAPACITY 486 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT LOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE LT FROM B: 21 1182 1161 A 3. 10 0.02 FALL MOVES FROM C: 38 856 818 A 4.40 0.05 �i "+lr m=' .,4.-. 1 _ "l, .FS-,a`y'.,T r r+Fnw'A` vd{yrU-erufi`. • A. i 4985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 of 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:08:50 ALBERSTONS ENT EXISTING PM AST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED r?, OLUME= GEOMETRICS= EY t A- -B C LNERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES ONTROLS: FROM C: STOP REVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH ,MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: Y IINOR STREET LANES APPROACHt Ct SUMMERFIELD IP HARED LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANE: YES ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) {' PPROACH A: WESTBND B: EASTBND C: SUMMERFIELD DEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 RUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 APPROACH At WESTBND B: EASTBND C: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT OLUME O 433 11 104 335 0 16 O 63 , :.kHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 DJ VOLUME 0 481 12 116 372 0 18 O 70 ERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ass CAR/HR O 127 20 0 77 ; TEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM CtSUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 481 RITICAL GAPS 5.0 APACITY 738 :;: CTUAL CAPACITY 738 xTEP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM BtEASTBND :CONFLICTING FLOWS 481 r RITICAL GAPS 4.5 APAC I TY 963 CAPACITY USED 15% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.90 CTUAL CAPACITY 963 X 1A 985 HCM - CHAPTER 10 UNSIGNALIZED - 3 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 of 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:08:50 ALBERSTONS ENT EXISTING PM STEP 3 LEFT TURNS FROM C:SUMMERFIELD l ,CONFLICTING FLOWS 975 ZRITICAL GAPS 6.0 CAPACITY 297 ACTUAL CAPACITY 268 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT MOVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE LT FROM B: 127 863 736 A 4.89 0. 17 ALL MOVES FROM C: 97 545 448 A 8.03 0.22 1.. Eli �1 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13: 12:49 TIGARD ALBERSTONS ENTRANCE AM SCENARIO 1 ; -LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: D j A- -B 1 C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP ( FROM D: STOP ( PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET #R OF LANES: 2 LANES LAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO MAIN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES MINOR STREET LANES f APPROACH: C: ENTRANCE EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: YES EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: YES LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO ..,'ROACH: D: SUMMERFIELD EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO E SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) + APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4PPR0ACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 13 368 36 12 135 12 10 4 52 6 4 25 SHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ADJ VOLUME 14 409 40 13 150 13 11 4 58 7 4 28 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 : SASS CAR/HR 16 15 12 5 64 7 5 31 k ' STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 429 150 rr�"I TICAL GAPS 5.0 5.0 ` l;_;AC I TY 780 1047 kAPACITY USED 8% 3% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.95 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 780 1047 ' 11985 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13: 12:49 I .TIGARD ALBERSTONS ENTRANCE AM SCENARIO i L,-EP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:DURHAM WESTBND �A:DURHAM EASTBND CONFLICTING FLOWS 449 150 CRITICAL GAPS 4.5 4.5 CAPACITY 890 1182 CAPACITY USEDr 2% 1% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 890 1182 STEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 607 627 CRITICAL GAPS 5.5 5.5 � -CAPACITY 551 539 CAPACITY USED 1% 1% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1.00 1.00 i ACTUAL CAPACITY 545 532 ;STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 639 689 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 ..CAPACITY 455 427 ACTUAL CAPACITY 442 400 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT LnJVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE LT FROM A: 16 1162 1166 A 3.09 0.01 LT FROM B: 15 890 675 A 4. 11 0.02 LT FROM C: 12 442 430 A 8.38 0.03 TH FROM C: 5 545 540 A 6.67 0.01 CRT FROM C: 64 780 716 A 5.03 0.09 ALL MOVES FROM D: 43 755 712 A 5.06 0.06 s 3 ; 1 f F M - ..d'}+y^C4drosz 1 .1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGTIMEe1D: 1641APPROACHES (PAGE i OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 ITIGARD ALBERSTONS ENTRANCE PM SCENARIO 1 LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED JOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: D A- -B C iSENERAL CHARACTERISTICS DOPULATION •GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP FROM D: STOP ?REVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET 0 OF LANES: 2 LANES [ MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO i 'lAIN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES MINOR STREET LANES ' APPROACH: C: ENTRANCE EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: YES XCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: YES -ARSE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO I ..--PRDACH: D: SUMMERFIELD EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO FARSE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) ,APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D:0SUMMMERFIELD .00 LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 gHRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 33GHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 104 335 54 49 411 11 1430.90 5 98 10 13 63 .90 SHF 0.90 0.90 4DJ VOLUME 116 372 60 54-0x57 12 1500028 109 16 14 70 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0 i OASS CAR/HR 127 60 175 31 120 20 16 77 F D:SUMMERFIELD STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE 402 457 ` CONFLICTING FLOWS 5.0 5.0 l 7=ITICAL GAPS 602 757 ;ACI TY 10% 6�4&PEDANCE APACITY USED 15� a0.90 0.94 x FACTOR 602 757 ACTUAL CAPACITY ri 1 ,1985 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13: 16: 12 'TIGARD ALBERSTONS ENTRANCE PM SCENARIO 1 L,..tP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:DURHAM WESTBND A:DURHAM EASTBND -CONFLICTING FLOWS 432 457 CRITICAL GAPS 4.5 4.5 CAPACITY 904 883 ' CAPACITY USED 7% 14% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.96 0.91 >PCTUAL CAPACITY 904 883 STEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 1029 1059 ,CRITICAL GAPS 5.5 5.5 { CAPACITY 338 326 ( CAPACITY USED 10% 6% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.94 0.97 ACTUAL CAPACITY 294 284 STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 1113 1196 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 ,CAPACITY 250 225 ACTUAL CAPACITY 198 165 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT ..aVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL (SEC) AVa QUEUE zi x LT FROM As 127 883 756 A 4.76 0. 17 r -ALT FROM Bs 60 904 844 A 4.27 0.07 T FROM Cs 175 198 23 E 155.60 7.55 TH FROM C: 31 294 264 C 13.64 0. 12 RT FROM C: 120 802 682 A 5.28 0. 18 ALL MOVES FROM Ds 112 408 295 C 12. 19 0.38 fi 1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES S (F•AGE 1 OF 2) DATE:O7-01-1986 TIME: 13: 18:59 SCENARIO 2 AM PEAK LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME- GEOMETRICS, KEY: D A- -B C I SENERAL CHARACTERISTICS -OPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP FROM D: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET 4 OF LANES: 2 LANES � 11AIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO � .11AIN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES -hINOR STREET LANES i APPROACH: C: ENTRANCE EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: YES i EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: YES L-ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO 1.--WPROACH: D: SUMMERFIELD EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO XCLUS.I VE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO _ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO 1SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LEFTS • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 rHRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 O.00 0.00 0.00 APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST a: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 13 368 40 12 135 5 10 4 52 b 4 25 'HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 -.ADJ VOLUME 14 409 44 13 150 6 11 4 58 7 4 28 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 t ,�ASS CAR/HR 16 15 12. 5 64 7 5 31 STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 431 r-"-.'PAC TICAL GAPS 150 5.0 5.0 I TY 778 1047 APACITY USED B7 3% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.95 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 778 1047 : 1985 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13: IS:59 rr SCENARIO 2 AM PEAK ._� ZP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:DURHAM WESTBND A:DURHAM EASTBND t..CONFLICTING FLOWS 453 150 CRITICAL GAPS 4.5 4.5 -'CAPACITY 886 1 182 CAPACITY USED 2% 1% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 886 1182 STEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD 'CONFLICTING FLOWS 609 631 CRITICAL GAPS 5.5 5.5 CAPACITY 550 536 CAPACITY USED 1% 1% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1.00 1.00 ACTUAL CAPACITY 543 529 STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD i CONFLICTING FLOWS 641 693 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 CAPACITY 454 425 ACTUAL CAPACITY 440 398 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT .VEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE = T FROM A: 16 1182 1166 A 3.09 0.01 I-,LT FROM Ba 15 886 871 A 4. 13 0.02 A—T FROM C: 12 440 428 A 8.41 0.03 TH FROM C: 5 543 538 A 6.69 0,01 AT FROM C: 64 778 715 A 5.04 0.09 ALL MOVES FROM D: 43 752 710 A 5.07 0,06 s { s I ; a F t a � (i(ifif ' 4 1985 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE:O7-01-1986 TIME: 13:21:44 SCENARIO 2 PM PEAK; LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED VOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: D ` A— —B C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP FROM Da STOP f PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET 4 OF t.ANES: 2 LANES E MAIN STREET APPROACH A — EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO MAIN STREET APPROACH B — EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: Ca ENTRANCE EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: YES [ EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: YES LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO l .o,ePROACH: D: SUMMERFIELD EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO -SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) -APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ['APPROACH A: DURHAM EAST B: DURHAM WEST C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 104 335 77 49 411 49 143 25 9B 16 13 63 LDJ HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 VOLUME 116 372 86 54 457 54 159 28 109 18 14 70 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 'PASS CAR/HR 127 60 175 31 120 20 16 77 STEP' 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 415 457 C:ITICAL GAPS 5.0 5.0 ,A AC I TY 791 757 APACITY USED 15% 10% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.90 0.94 ACTUAL CAPACITY 791 757 1965 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:21:44 SCENARIO 2 PM PEAK E.._:„EP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:DURHAM WESTBND A:DURHAM EASTBND ACONFLICTING FLOWS 458 457 CRITICAL GAPS 4.5 4.5 CAPACITY 882 883 CAPACITY USED 7% 14% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.96 0.91 €ACTUAL CAPACITY 882 883 ["STEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 1042 1084 jXCRITICAL GAPS 5.5 5.5 CAPACITY 333 317 1'aCAPAC I TY USED 11'!. 6'!. IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.94 0.97 ACTUAL CAPACITY 290 276 X STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 1126 1221 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 ,..CAPACITY 246 218 4 [ACTUAL CAPACITY 194 160 fy SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT _-, JVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE LT FROM A: 127 883 756 A 4.76 0. 17 LT FROM B: 60 882 822 A 4.38 0.07 ``LT FROM Cr 175 194 20 E 184.53 8.96 __TH FROM C: 31 290 259 C 13.89 0. 12 RT FROM C: 120 791 672 A 5.36 0. 18 ALL MOVES FROM Da 112 399 286 C 12.57 0.39 .3 (`t �' �r.IVa a.,.k.'rm.<...,a 4,s._,...,,3- s>....ew,..x. . '_ •' _ _ _ -1985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:30:21 SCENARIO 3 AM PEAK LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED �VVOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY: D A- -B C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS ,POPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP - FROM C RT LANE: STOP FROM D: STOP PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES MAIN STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO MAIN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: ENTRANCE EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: YES EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: YES l LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO =,.-*PROACH: D: SUMMERFIELD EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO LARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO 'RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO [SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) APPROACH A: DURHAM EBND B: DURHAM WBND C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIGHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i APPROACH A: DURHAM EBND B: DURHAM WEND C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 13 368 42 12 135 5 65 4 52 6 4 25 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 i:ADJ VOLUME 14 409 47 13 150 6 72 4 58 7 4 28 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 PASS CAR/HR 16 15 79 5 64 7 5 31 t STEP i RIGHT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD R 'CONFLICTING FLOWS 432 150 ''ITICAL GAPS 5.0 5.0 :PAC I TY 777 1047 CAPACITY USED B% 3% MPEDANCE FACTOR 0.95 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 777 1047 i f • -1985 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) ' DATE:07-01-1986 TIME: 13:30:21 �CENAR I G 3 AM PEAK k—EP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:DURHAM WBND A:DURHAM EBND CONFLICTING FLOWS 456 150 'CRITICAL GAPS 4.5 4.5 'CAPACITY 884 1182 CAPACITY USED 2% 1% [IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0.99 0.99 ACTUAL CAPACITY 884 1182 ,STEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 610 633 —CRITICAL GAPS 5.5 5.5 CAPACITY 549 535 :CAPACITY USED 1% 1% IMPEDANCE FACTOR 1.00 1.00 —ACTUAL CAPACITY 542 528 : ,STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD ,CONFLICTING FLOWS 642 696 `CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 .CAPACITY 453 424 FACTUAL CAPACITY 440 397 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT L-.sVEMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE LT FROM As 16 1182 1166 A 3.09 0.01 T FROM B: 15 884 869 A 4. 14 0.02 tT FROM C: 79 440 360 B 9.99 0.22 TH FROM Cs 5 542 537 A 6.70 0.01 r—RT FROM C: 64 777 714 A 5.04 0.09 ALL MOVES FROM Ds 43 751 709 A 5.08 0.06 t a l.� A f Y 4' - r 11985 HCM - CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED - 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 1 OF 2) DATE:O7-01-1986 TIME: 13:27:23 T I GARD ALBERTSONS ENTRANCE Sc- c L/ s.1 LAST DATASETS LOADED OR SAVED JOLUME= GEOMETRICS= KEY:' D S A- -B f C GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS aOPULATION GREATER THAN 250,000: YES CONTROLS: FROM C: STOP FROM C RT LANE: STOP FROM D: STOP 'PREVAILING SPEED: 30 MPH MAIN STREET # OF LANES: 2 LANES �IIA'N STREET APPROACH A - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: NO AIN STREET APPROACH B - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANE: YES MINOR STREET LANES APPROACH: C: ENTRANCE EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: YES 1 =XCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: YES &-ARGE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO RIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO l____PROACH: D: SUMMERFIELD EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANES: NO J'XCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LANES: NO -ARSE RIGHT TURN RADIUS OR SHALLOW RIGHT TURN ANGLE: NO MIGHT TURN ACCELERATION LANE ON MAJOR: NO SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTIONS (in seconds) APPROACH A: DURHAM EBND B: DURHAM WBND C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LEFTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THRUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t I GHTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 APPROACH A: DURHAM EBND B: DURHAM WBND C: ENTRANCE D: SUMMERFIELD LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT VOLUME 104 335 116 49 411 11 217 25 106 16 13 863 ?HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 LtADJ VOLUME 116 372 129 54 457 12 241 2B 118 18 14 959 PERCENT GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 �SASS CAMS/HR 127 60 265 31 130 20 16 1055 t STEP 1 RIGHT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMMERFIELD 7�_ ONFLICTING FLOWS 437 457 FI T I CAL GAPS 5.0 5.0 ACITY 774 757 61:ZEDANCE ACITY USED 17% 139% FACTOR 0.89 0_00 ACTUAL CAPACITY 774 757 [4985 HCM — CHAPTER 10: UNSIGNALIZED — 4 APPROACHES (PAGE 2 OF 2) DATEz07-01-1986 TIME: 13:27:23 TIGARD ALBERTSONS ENTRANCE �.. fP 2 LEFT TURNS FROM B:DURHAM WBNA:DURHAM EBND 50I 457 CONFLICTING FLOWS 4.5 4.5 CRITICAL GAPS 847 883 -`CAPACITY 14% CAPACITY USED 7!. 96 IMPEDANCE FACTOR 0. 47 0.91 LACTUAL CAPACITY 847 883 STEP 3 THRU MOVES FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMME RFIELD [ 1063 111282B CONFLICTING FLOWS 5.5 5.5 RITICAL GAPS 325 301 C',CAPArITY 6% CAPACITY USED 0.93 0.97 IMPEDANCE FACTOR 282 262 ACTUAL CAPACITY STEP 4 LEFT TURNS FROM C:ENTRANCE D:SUMPIERFIELD CONFLICTING FLOWS 2037 1273 CRITICAL GAPS 6.0 6.0 CAPACITY 78 204 10 147 I ;ACTUAL CAPACITY l;Y SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF SERVICE BY MOVEMENT 1,,,,�- EMENT DEMAND CAPACITY RESERVE LOS AVG DEL(SEC) AVG QUEUE LT FROM As 127 883 756 A 4.76 0. 17 .T FROM Bs 60 847 787 A 4.58 O'08 FROM Cl 265 O —265 E* INFINITE INFINITE TH FROM C: 31 282 251 C 14.32 0. 12 JiT FROM Cl 130 774 644 A 5.59 0.20 ALL MOVES FROM D: 1090 687 —403 E* INFINITE INFINITE r Y ee` � -r.w . t Y�' .sk��' •wtm.,7.,-� ,.s..E„= ''Y.x" - ut 3 t • 17 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD ALBERSTONS ..,`INTERSECTION: PACIFIC HIGHWAY AND DURHAM ROAD DESIGN DAY: SCENARIO 1 PH PEAK --______-__GEONETRY No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt Xh. Thru Rt.kTh. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach lanes Lanes lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 NB 1 0 1 0 1 0 NB 1 0 0 1 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------TRAFFIC VOLUMES———-—--------—------- Left Right Toro Thru Turn Total EB 104 335 54 493 NB 49 411 11 471 0 143 25 98 266 SB 16 13 63 92 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) Va LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In opposing E@UIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The G -- Volume PCElt Vlt PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining fvph) Lane Lanes 411 2 104 208 3" 597 1 597 0 0 597 389 2 49 46 411 509 1 509 0 0 509 76 1.1 143 157.3 123 280.3 1 280 0 0 280 123 1.1 16 17.6 76 93.6 1 94 0 0 94 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -749 3 G00 •999 4 1000 i up 5 h CALCULATIONS OF STATUS----- 17 EB LT= 104 NB LT= 143 VB THW= 411 SB THIRT= 94 SUMS 515 SW 237 ' MB LT= 49 SB LT= 0 EB THiRT= 389 NB THIRT= 123 GLM!= 438 SUM= 123 SKOF,CRITICAL VOLUMES= 752 LOS = a 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD ALBERTSONS INTERSECTION: DURHAM AND MAIN ACCESS DESIGN DAY: FULL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO 2 t ----------------EEOMETRY ----------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,6Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lines Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 O 1 1 0 0 NH 1 0 1 0 1 0 NS 1 0 0 1 0 0 SB 0 1 0 0 1 0 -------TRAFFIC VOLUMES---------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Tarn Total EB 104 335 218 657 NB 76 411 it 478 NB 243 34 122 399 SB 16 36 63 115 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EQJ,, Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCEit Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+7H Lane Remaining 1vph) Lane Lanes 4 411 2 104 20B 553 761 2 381 173 277 381 _ 553 2 76 152 411 563 1 563 0 O 563 36 1.1 243 267.3 156 423.3 1 423 0 0 423 156 1.1 16 17.6 36 53.6 1 54 0 0 54 WT PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 Boo -999 4 _- 1000 i np 5 t CALC(A.ATIONS OF STATUS— ED TATUS EB LT• 104 NB LT= 243 8 TWT= 563 SB THiRT= 54 SUM= 667 SUN= 297 i NB LT= 76 SB LT= 16 ; 0 TH&RT= 277 NB T%RT= 156 j SUNS 353 SUM= 172 MAXIMUM CAPACITY ,3 SIR( OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES MAXIMUM SUM`OF CRITICAL VOLUMES= %4 UNDER CAPACITY -------------------- 0 TO 1200 UNDER ight;Turn Check OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR > 1400 OVER f ` r IM HISHNAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD ALBERSTONS INTERSECTION: DURHAM ROAD AND MAIN ENTRANCEISMERFIELD DESIGN DAT: SCENARIO 3 PN PEAK —GEOMETRY (( No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of 4' Lt. U.M. Tbrru Rt.&Tb. Rt. Rt,Th,kLt Approach lanes lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes lanes EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 MB 1 0 1 0 1 0 NB 1 0 0 1 0 0 Be 0 0 0 0 0 1 T ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES-- ---------------_���_ Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 104 335 116 555 N8 49 411 It 471 NB 217 25 106 348 SB 16 13 63 92 K LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) Vo wM_---------� LT� Total No. of Equiv.M -Thru�Val, In Vol. In Opposing EDUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LUTH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LUTH lane Remaining lyph) - Lane Linn 411 2 104 20B 451 659 1 659 0 0 659 451 2 49 98 411 509 1 509 0 0 509 76 1.1 217 238.7 131 369.7 1 370 0 0 370 131 1.1 16 17.6 76 93.6 1 94 0 0 94 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 -799 3 i 800 -999 4 1000 i up 5 TIONS OF STATUS- ---ED LT= 104 NB LT= 217 NB TJW= 411 SB TNkRT= 94 SUM= 515 SUM= 311 NB LT- 49 SB LT= 0 U- B:TWT2 451 IAB MIRT= 131 - SUN= 500 SUM= 132 M111"'M OF CRincol. VOLUMES= 826 LOS r d j �� 'Right.Tnre Check_.OK VERSION: 84.03 RELEASE: JUNE, 1985 t SI6NAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE C t OFFICE OF IMPLEMENTATION ...FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TECHNICAL SUPPORT MESSAGE CENTER: (904) 392-0378 1 ttftft##fi#i#}ttttttttftf#ftittif#${{}}}}}}tftt#fit{tf###t{{{}ftf}#ttt#i#ii##titttftfttti#tint#ttiiitt#tt#{}tt#ftt#t#}fttt}}}it 50AP_- INPU7 ECHO NO. CARD ID A 8 NBT N8l $BT SBL EBT EBL WB1 WK COMMENT _ ____ — –» ____ __– _-_- _— ____ ____}{ti-44+b________________: i 2 ISESIN 0 1700 1800 60 5 30 .95 .5 DURHAM AND MAIN ACCESS i t 3 i ttttttftittt{iiit{t}}}{}#iffitftiiiitittfttfittitfft 1 41 51 , 6 1 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION 1 7 1 16016 SW BOONES FERRY ROAD 1 6 1 LAKE OSWEGO OREGON 1 91 1 10 1 TIGARD ALBERTSONS I 11 1 1 12 I ttttttttttttitttittttttttitt#ttttttttt�ttt:tttttit# 1 13 1 t 1 2 NBT NK OT SBL EBT EBL NBT WBL I 14 1CONTROL 60 1700 0 90 90 1 15 1VOIURE 60 1700 123 143 76 16 389 104 422 49 I 16 1CAPACITY60 1700 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 17 1LEFT 2 2 2 2 ENNS 1 18 INEADNAY 3.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 1 19 ITRUCKS 60 1700 5 2 S 2 2 0 2 S 1 ttt NOTE ... EASTBOUND LEFT. TRUCK FACTOR ASSUMED NOT TO EXIST. 20 ISEBUENCE L?T L?T I ( 21 (TABLE 4 7 19 22 31 33 1 22 IRUN 2 7/2 8 PH SCENARIO 2 1 --_–s _ ____ ____ ____ —_ ____ ____ ____ _–__ H ii NO. CARD ID A B NBT NBL SIT SK DT EBL NBT UK COMMENT ttt NARNIN6: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS IGNORED WITH RESTRICTIVE LEFT TURNS IN THE NORTODUND, LEFT. DIRECTION. WARNING: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS IGNORED WITH RESTRICTIVE LEFT TURNS IN THE SOUTHBOUND LEFT. DIRECTION. ttt WARNING: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS ISM. D WITH RESTRICTIVE LEFT TURNS IN THE EASTBOUND LEFT. DIRECTION. a ttt WARNING: LEFT TURN RELEASE VALUE IS IGNORED WITH RESTRICTIVE LEFT TURNS IN THE NESTBOUND LEFT DIRECTION. < S16AAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKA6E > PAGE - 2 i 1 TABLE NO. 4 CALCULATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VEHICLES PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) H\!H#fii}iH\iHHHi#!#t#f!}!f#HitHiii!}#\#Ht####t}i#iftti#\#ifi#fi\\\}}}#fit\#f\#i#i\i#ttif\#t#f # IVOL0TINE + 1 - WIT # 2 -NIL • 3- SIT + 4 - GILT 5 - EST # 6-EBL i 7 -NBT ! 8 - NIL + H##iilii!##iH#HffHtt#ii#ti##ii{}}{};}i##HtfHi#}!#!H}}}{}}}{iiiffi tiH#ii iii#i\#iifitit#\!{#tiHi + I # 1700 + 126.690 + 144.716 + 78.260 + 16.192# 393.668 # 104.000 # 427.064 i 50.470 + -r TABLE NO. 7 CALCULATED SATURATION FLOWS (VEHICLES PER 60 MINUTES OF GREEN TINE) HHfiHH\#{###iHflif{Hi}ii#!#{#\f\#i!}}}\##i\i#Hfif#iHHf�iti{HH#iii#ifit#i#H##if}iHiiiiiH## # ISAT # TINE # 1 - NBT # 2 - NIL f 3 - SBT f 4-SBL # 5 - EIT + 6-EBL # 7 - NBT + 8 -WBL + # 1 # 1700# 1636.364 # 1440.000 # 1636.364 # 1440.000 # 3272.727 # 1440.000 # 3272.727 # 1440.000 + HHi}ifHi}i\HHH!!#fi##HitlHHt!!i##i\fi#i#iltH i!#iiHitiif#f{iii###f##Hi#ilii\\H#i##HitHH# TABLE NO. 19 LEFT TURN SATURATION FLOW BASED ON OPPOSING THRU VOLUME (PER 60 MINUTE PERIOD) HHiilitiH###iHfi HHifH!#H##HHHi####if}if#!i##iHHiiHHi#ti#!##ii##Hif#t######H#+###!H#it #LFTSAT# TINE # 1 -NBT # 2- NIL # 3 - SIT # 4 - SDL f 5 -EBT # 6-EBL # 7 - NBT # B -VOL # HHi+#iHiffi#iH##ii#H#H!!i#HH###iiiHHHHt#tfH#it##f}##{}}#iH##HHHf##\t#i#ifilfiHH##H# .- 0 1 + 1700# .000 # 1281.259 # .000 + 1210.204 a .000 # 807.283 # .000 # 845.947 # H HH#HlHlii#HHHHHiif#f##Hf!#HfH!#i##HH#iHH#H#HH#H#H#iiHif#H#Hi##if##Hi#H#H!# TABLE NO. n CRITICAL VOLUNE SATiR)ATION FLOW RATIOS FOR EACH PHASE BASED ON ADJU6TED VOLUINES i.4 H##HHHHHHHH##Ig,#i#HHH###iHHf fHHHi#i}ii#f HH# #CRITY#TINE f PHASE 1 # PHASE 2 # PHASE 3 + PHASE 4# PHASE 5 # PHASE 6 # HHHH+HHHHf#Hf#H##H#iii##HifH#iHHHHifHHHH##fH#HH###!H#H • # 1 f 1700# .011 # .009 # .048 f .035 # .037 # .130 # HHHH#H#HH#}#}HHHi#+#H#H#HH}###HHH##HHH#H ###H#HH##H##H# TAKE 10. 31 CALCULATE@ EFFEECTIVE GREET!/CYCLE RATIO FOR EACH NOVENENT (INCLUDING LEFT (01 RELEASE ADJUSTMENT) H#HIHHHH#HH#HHHH#f#iHHHifHiiHHHHHH#ii#HHHHHHHHi#HHHtiHHHH#HHHi# #LAMA#TINE# 1 -NBT# 2 -NIL # 3 -IGT # 4-SIN. # 5 -EBT f 6-EDL # 7-NBT# 8 -NBL + Hi#{fHHiiiiHHHHHfHi#H#HHi#Ht#flHHHHHHHHHH!#H##HH#HHH#HHHtiiH#HHH#ti s'• # 1 # 1700# .330 # .242 # .115 # .027 # .403 # .174 # .314 + .084 # H#tHHHi##f#iHH##iHfHH#iHHH###f iiH HH##HH HHHH##H###iHHt#H#H#i#H#!Ht#H##iHi# a 4 1 TABLE 440. 33 CALCULATED DEGREE OF SATURATION I VOLUME/CAPACITY ) i IF I =997.999 NO GREEN TINE) �� HHHHHHHliifHHHHf##Hf ti##HHHHHHH#f#iHHH#f#f#f#f##HHf{HHHHHfiliHHf#H+f{3l..._.. # I #TINE# 1 -ICT # 2 -NIL # 3 - SIT * 4 - 98L # 5 -EBT * 6-EBLf 7 -NBTf 8 -1R)L # HHHH#iH##H#i#iHifHfHfflH#!fi#iH##HH #i##f}ifif#if H##HHH#IHHHi!##i!H#if#ffHffH#f! # 1 + 1700 f .235 # .416 + .416 # .416 # .29B,* .416 # .416 # .416+ _ H##H#H#fiHffi#iiH#H#HH##i{ifii##f##i}�#f#t###ff}i##i#fHf#HHHffHiH#HHHHiff#if#fH#Hfi SI`6NALf OPERATIONS ANALYSI6 PACKAGE ? PAGE ' 3 r� L E F T T U R N C H E C K (PER 60 NINUTE PERIOD) PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST80UND WESTBOUND 40. TINE VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP VOL CAP 1 1700 145. 348. 16. 39. 104. 250. 50. 121. 141 F i i (( < S 6NA ! OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PACKAGE ? PAGE - 4 t ` IGN AND EVALUATION SUHMARY v.> CONTROLLER SEQUENCE LOST TIRE SPECIFIED INTERSECTION M RUN NO. AND TITLE TYPE DIAL NIS E/N PHASES /PH TOTAL SAT. LEVEL EDURHAM AND MAIN ACCESS 1: 712 8 PH SCENARIO 2 ACTUATED VIA L?T L?T -ww 63.5 14.0 ".0% MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS SEQUENCE DELAY STOPS EIC FUEL EIC LEFT NAXINUM VIC LEFT TURN TREATMENT NOVENENTSs (VER-HRS) (I) (SAL) IVEN) QUEUE RATIO PROTECTION VEH/CYC PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PN 5 PH 6 NO THRU s .79 72.6 1.39 2.3 .23 ???? IXII r LEFT t 1.23 64.3 1.96 .0 3.0 .42 REST .0 IIXI M? l SLR THRU s .88 92.9 1.25 1.8 .42 ???? IXXI LEFT s .27 98.4 .32 .0 .4 .42 REST .0 XIII ???? EB THRU , 2.02 67.8 3.88 6.7 .30 ???? IIII LEFT s 1.03 89.1 1.54 .0 2.3 .42 REST .0 XXXI ???? NB THRU s 2.96 78.9 5.15 8.4 .42 ?M. IIIX LEFT a .62 44.9 .85 .0 1.2 .42 REST .0 IIXX ???4 NEA8IfRES OF EFFECTIVENESS SI6NAL 71NIN6 SKYSISt DELAY STOPS EI. FUEL EI. LEFT RAXINUM VIC ALL RED DIAL CYCLE PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PN 5 PN 6 PERIOD t IVEH-MRS) (Y) (SAL) (VEH) QUEUE RATIO (SEC) NO. (SEC) (3) (I) (I) (1) (I) 11) 1700-1600, 9.80 78.1 16.35 .0 8.4 .42 .0 N/A 90.0: 6.6 21.5 15.4 12.3 8.9 35.3 MARY , 9.80 78.1 16.35 .0 8.4 .42 TIMING BASED ON EQUAL DEGREE OF SATURATION. i s I i. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i { November 17, 1386 1•p; Members of the City Council � - FROM: William A. Monahan, Director Community Development SUBJECT: Albertson's CPA 6-86, ZC 10-86 Housing Density In reviewing the information provided by Albertson's in support of its comprehensive plan amendment, I noticed that an error was made in determining the extent of the impact of the proposed change on density. I found that the applicant estimated that a change in designation would believe, is high becausein a net sOf the 659 units of housing opportunity. acre net losfrom buildable buildables not been lands list,tathere ken n is a account.to loss of o 40e units of eliminated potential housing. Thirty of the 40 units need to Le made up, since 10 units, mple, if the required average density, can be deducted ted orwea each acwouldr e. For need 1000 exaunits of we had 100 acres of residentially zoned housing potential to maintain a density of ten. If 10 acres of R-40 are lost. This eliminated, 400 potential units are can be shown on a table as follows: ACRES UNITS OF OPPORTUNITY - - 100 1000 10 400 Rezoning causes loss of 90 600 Remainder Here 90 acres remain and 600 units of potential housing. Since the goal is 10 units per acre, 900 units are required for the 90 units. Although 400 units p to maintain a density of 10 units per were lost, only 300 need to be made u acre Following is an. 1983, analysis of the buildable lands inventory completed in recent in June of 1984, and modified by updated for acknowledgement Comprehensive Plan changes. - ,Y BUILDABLE LANDS ACRES UNITS t LCDC Submittal 1306.57 11,770 CPA 4-84 4.30 172 1310.87 11,942 Council Action in June of 1984 Changing 233.49 acres of 1,168 R-20 to R-25 No Gain 1310.87 13,110 LCDC accepted the redesignation of all R-20 to R-25. Our acknowledged in included 1310.87 acres. The applicant listed three comprehensive plan changes since 1984 and asked the Council to apply these changes to the overall net acreage and housing unit opportunities in the City. The changes affect the plan as follows: CPA 4-84 No change. It was included in Acknowledgement. CPA 20-84 No change in acres + 38 units CPA 6-85 No change in acres + 4 units TOTAL 1310.87 13,152 units The proposed redesignation of the Albertson site will reduce both acreage and total units. ACRES UNITS 1310.67 13,152 Reduce R-40 (1 . 15)e (427) 7 R-25 R-4.5 ( 2.85) ( 13 5—---� TOTAL 1290.29 12,533 The loss of 20+ acres of buildable residentially zoned land also results in a decrease of opportunity. The net effect is this: 1290.29 Acres 12,533'units of opportunity X 10 Units/Acre Goal 12,903 Units requiree by the Metro Housing Rule A total of 370 units need to be added to Tigard's housing opportunity. If the Council chooses to require that all lost opportunity created by the Albertson's change be made up now, exclusive of the 48 units gained in prior amendments, 418 units need to be redesignated. Only 10.68 of the 11.95 acres zoned R-40 were shown in the Buildable Lends' Inventory. The difference results from the deduction of housing units and surrounding land from the total — not considered buildable under the method used by the City. If the Council chooses to direct the staff and Albertsons to evaluate possible Comprehensive Plan changes to rezone to gain 370 or 412 units, it may wish to consider the following exhibits: A. A table of the 1984 buildable lands B. A table of the 1984 density opportunity in each TYPO C. A map showing vacant land near the site which could be zoned, and D. A table showing possible density gains for specific rezonings in the area near the site. 3 /br19O a co CD .�. •� � N . FYI• G 14 N N ry AI 1.1 ma y. .a .r cc - .. .i .1 •i N r 14 � � O �D Yf r1 ry N w N 4n O w rl N n .! An Qp+i F Y ^p r N N V a N W a N a . ~ IV N m N ^� N N M ry O n in N M .4 n N O n O r N r co a � a a. N N R in r .� O n O n : r � N f H M m N N r .ti r4 r 1° .i4 a M n co i N .d 7 h tn N N N b a co M In �O OG r m o .oi 00 0 .o+ yy (CIn44 y � � � � r14 i 3-iyaa�l � ..y.�4ty d�u.-f. r4`..�4 '�i - - r�..i �z,✓+,f� ,2.,uq- .�'� ^+r`. M Oar - • 4 fps : N : -4 S $ K w K r a; .Ca .Q+ 4 • on 41F 64 co M re rb 4 4 O M Sid N P! T _N %0 P _ - u DU . .:.. . :.... i F►11 1 1 X11 � r e�� i 1 )P1 0 1 111 r 1 111 1 1 117 F j 1 �P 1 1(rr r r!1-1 1 11L� 1 � ! !. I t I t 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I t 1 � ----_�._:,_ .:.. _._.:,a._,N_ .._ ,�-___._._..�..,,;,,,,__.:. ti NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED 1 M DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN - THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. -- __.. .. oe sz ez�_, zz az sz oz ez zz ez oz -sr ei--c�--si-._s�__b1 el_ Ze _.oi O1._6 ® � -a--- s___b ___E_ +n1Cee11uulmlluuluul»elauluir tni dq t a UI!➢1 Ill 6 x d MURK C-ira' 7 �- -� .� i ■ ■.f._1119� � � ,����•��1�•'��� e �\�� �a���e�� m . yV. y r`a !,®® �; �. r� f ®`•�' "• 1 en fix; '� ■ f' �0 S►,iA a �, Y �. ®i. ��\,��"� v t� i� �±, 'ra^ 'y 's w J„ \ ®Ilsl�i , ` �'!;ya eym'•�P � �,v'� �>� ■ ,■oil �j � ■ � �®t►y �� �.4�" f �4 , \\ �,.,911 ■ --- �e s�■1��ld����� sa �' 3a,�®�9�IF? .' 1.�A �•:'':{` ��'w ''#® tO�a�'.'�.".!.f���R ��\ `. ! ..■1♦ ■'I ®d f j1p '� �� �� .�I�m�^xr ::. //II/ ■fir- �,f�;�•,�',�/� �"0b:+�A��.eas�'►e ' =�� �\�` ®� ,®® �. �— ■r _s � � :q ; ®� � �e �� ' rig _. ■����� � 1■E3,I11!■ ���v . ®®■ . ■�� `°������ � ,� atm ��► :* ••'' 911 s R ■ rm INS Eli ON O, � _: � ..�� .1,11, _ Bi �■r: ■ ,JL E� . ra•_ R � C�Iv�1111`� � --1� -_'� 3 . �■ sem.■tl�I� / a ' .� ENV, ■■ .� •, : = aft: ����� ;,�■■ �� ��I?7 11� ■ � !� t ■� Ill \/- �. _ °� 1.r1��� � ■ \ s' �v' "1•�=1 ar-s��..�,, ®fir •� I '�.i '�. � . - .- ■0■■■■■■1�®'Wil• ��^ ��;t' ,r, . ���� ISN„_► �: i • 1_ �' .�rs�l�■//■■ ■/■■/�ura��•�polllllul►u — � si� � ♦ /IT71♦ P �Ri,�w� f �NNI v�.'Q� os♦►������ 1tr\\,.Y-�!\\�".-3-.�'��� �� __ ug���U�� �►i���N1�■11�7 .:.r � , `�. .�:R,r;�'■ I' • ��� /�+ its� \\\\\\t:abs./. :'�1Ra �.. � > +-♦ �..` �liiL■ I� w��;� —�■ !� ' �'� 1 �i���;`,* x\11 `\\1\\1\\� Q ��!t� ,.i��` � ,�+ �f o���♦��� •���``►� 'E!� s '��' � :,��-K ��. � � ♦. Iia �1 �/ U9��11l:11 � ■:��; II ■■■■ 111111 !�. � �UcO� r ■�''.Ss��,rf%�I��;���a� I//�a.11l � • � HIII 1 � IL11.'IIL41 11',�Tnlu+• � -■ _,.. * .,. . n, . J' ■3 ■■■�f ���/�/Ihil 1u1��i'����'llr.�� r�n n4��11 !' ' ' �. T.7Ti7 _. t r, t�L+�..1 jlh■ � r��\Il'IIL��— , :�■.,� - F iJ1 ny' v�■�h� +••��HIM M ... i .. tl_:i-. t i li:A:..1.1 L1Y 1, i'- .� •.i. ... .. z a N W - a >• un m v o o .iOc v w z a a o w N N 1A N N h. r+ N .-1 .i r/ N r—i ri a N I cc a a a w E• 4 N N N •4 N m A A Ae N a u+ v+ u+ u+ z N N 1- t1' N a a a a z a a w �+ O l`; M O 0% d O M � W N sl W 01 L, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council November 7, 1986 FROM; William A. Monahan, Director , Community Development f SUBJECT: Albertsons' CPA 6-86, ZC 10--86 On November 3, 1986, the Council heard the application of Albertsons' . Inc. for a Comprehensive Plan amendment for property at the corner of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. The property, consisting of 22 acres, is presently zoned in three residential densities: R-4.5, R-25, and R-40. A decision on the conversion of the property to a Commercial General classification was tabled by the Council pending receipt of additional information concerning traffic and housing density. The staff has prepared this memo to raise issues for Council consideration and discussion at the meeting of November 17. We will be prepared to elaborate on these concerns during the Council meeting. Areas of_Concern: During the November 3 meeting, issues surfaced relative to each of four areas: 1) Economic Development 2) Housing Density 3) Traffic Impacts 4) Approval Process The Council specifically requested more data concerning housing and traffic, impact. To insure that the Council acts properly on the application, staff wishes to remind the Council th,�I the applicable criteria contained ofd the the staff report must be applied and ruled upon by the Council. A copy staff report and applicant's traffic analysis is attached for review. The remainder of this memo will frame the issues in these areas, highlight information which the Council should consider, and present options for proceeding. The memo has been prepared with the thought that additional information is needed in order for the Council to approve the application. Economic Development Within the staff report, on page 3, the following finding was presented: Policy 5.1.3 is not satisfied because creating new, large scale commercial development located in the southwest corner of the City will not "improve or enhance" the central business district as the ALBERTSONS' MEMO CPA 6-86, ZC 10-86 Page 1 commercial focal point for the City. Although the specific effect of this proposal may be debatable, it is certainly clear the developments of this type will not have a positive effect upon the vitality of downtown. The downtown has not enjoyed the same economic growth which other areas of the community have in the past three years. Spreading commercial activity into areas which were planned in 1983 to be developed as residential, particularly in a project of this scale, would further hold back the revitalization of the downtown. 5.! THE CITY SHALL IMPROVE AND ENHANCE THE PORTIONS OF THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AS THE FOCAL POINT FOR COMMERCIAL, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS, CIVIC, AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY CREATING A DIVERSIFIED AND ECONOMICALLY VIABLE CORE AREA. The significance of the finding should be clarified. The issue is not that Albertsons' plans to close the existing store in Downtown. Instead, the staff has applied the policy 5.1.3 to this application by pointing out that in 1983 a fixed amount of land was designated for commercial development, including the downtown. Approval of the Albertsons' proposal may further affect or delay commercial activity in the downtown. The proposal would increase the amount of available commercial land, provide for another commercial center of more than neighborhood commercial character, and could ai'fert the eventual absorption of other available C-G designated land. Albertsons' has pointed out within a memo to the Planning Commission, included in the Council's materials distributed for the November 3 meeting, that the types of uses which would locate in the proposed commercial center differ from those which the CBD could attract. Should the Council wish to request further analysis on this point, staff should be advised. At this point, we are concentrating our efforts only in issues related to traffic and housing. Housing Density The designation of the subject site for commercial use would impact Tigard's compliance with State Goal 10 and the Metro Housing Rule. James Ross, Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development, pointed out in his letter of October 16, 1986, that Tigard must maintain compliance with the density requirements of an overall housing opportunity of ten units per buildable acre throughout Tigard. Therefore, any land use action which removes housing opportunities must be carefully considered and, if necessary, = delayed until a satisfactory upzoning of other land takes place to recover the lost housing opportunities. A second factor which Mr. Ross identified which we need to keep in mind, is that Tigard must also provide for a sufficient mix : of attached and detached housing units. Therefore, any rezoning of properties to recover housing density must also take into consideration housing types. Thus, if we find that our task is to increase housing density by 600 units throughout Tigard, a large amount of that housing opportunity must be placed within higher density designations. We cannot, for instance, simply make all R-4.5 in the City R-7 if the net result would be an increase of 600 units. We would be in violation of our housing mix requirements. h ALBERTSONS' MEMO CPA 6-86, ZC 10-86 Page 2 ,w The applicant has indicated that the proposed change would result in a loss of 659 units of housing opportunity. The applicant proposes to offset these units by asking the Council to recognize that 214 units have already been gained throughout Tigard within other land use applications. The remaining 445 units can be made up within rezonings or upzonings. The staff expressed concern over this approach within the staff report. The pertinent staff conclusion, found on Page 4 of the staff report, reads: "Though the staff has no objection of a procedural nature regarding taking credit for past density increases on other properties to justify the loss of the R-40 and R-25 zoning on the subject property, the staff has two reservations regarding the applicant's proposal. First, the area proposed for redesignation to High Density Residential cannot meet all of the applicable Locational Criteria because no direct access is available to a collector or arterial street and the area has significant development limitations due to a large drainageway and steep slopes. Second, the City is presently reviewing alternate development methods for residential projects involving flood plains and other natural hazards. The outcome of this review may affect the average residential density figures and the rezoning of this property for commercial use may make it more difficult to meet the City's obligation to Goal 10. Whether the City Council chooses to grant the application credit for prior density increase is a policy issue. No uniform policy has been discussed by the City." The Council needs to decide these issues: 1) Should the 214 units gained in Comprehensive Plan adjustments since 1983 be used as "credits" in this adjustment, requiring that it limit 445 other potential units be designated for residential use, or 2) Should the full 659 units displaced by this proposal be designated elsewhere, or 3) Should Albertsons' bear full responsibility for filing quasi judicial Comprehensive Plan amendments to rezone or upzone land in Tigard to gain 445 or 659 units?, or 4) Should the burden be placed on the City to go through a legislative process to identify the rezonings and upzoning required to meet LCDC rules? 5) Should a combined effort be undertaken to identify and rezone sufficient land to make up the lost residential units. The staff will present a map showing tracts of land which could be rezoned to make up some or all of the 445 or 659 units. We will also explain the options that are: 1) Rezone a combination of R-4.5, R-7, R-12, and R-25 to higher densities. ,, ALBERTSONS' MEMO CPA 6-86, ZC 10-86 Page 3 t,: 2) Concentrate rezoning to only one or two of the above zoning designations (i.e. rezone only R-7 properties to R-12). If this method is chosen, the need to preserve the proper mix of attached and detached units should be addressed. 3) Change a zoning density to create a new zone. The memo prepared by Attorney John Shonkwiler, proposed creation of an R--18 or R-32 zone. These options will be evaluated for you at the November 17, meeting. 4) Use a combination of the rbove options to make up the deficit. The staff was unable to devote sufficient time to evaluating sites in time to provide maps for your packet. we will evaluate the buildable lands inventory and give you better information to factor into your decision on the 17th. In particular, the sites mentioned mentioned by Attorney Shonkwiler in his memo will be addressed. Should the Council choose to direct staff to pursue the redesignation of property to gain 445 or 659 units, the Council should give direction on location. Options are: 1) Require that all density be made up in the general vicinity of the site, i.e NPO N 6. 2) Spread the density evenly through the City requiring all NPO's to take a share of the density. 3) Spread the density based on which NPO's have the zoning designation which the Council chooses to increase. For example, if the Council chooses to raise R-12 to R-18 the staff will attempt to evenly distribute the new zone throughout NPO's having R-12 zone designations. 4) Request that NPO's and property owners come forward with request for upzonings. Based on Council direction from the above options, the staff then will pursue either quasi judicial or legislative changes. If the Council wishes Albertsons' or property owners to suggest potential upzonings, they would properly be initiated by quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The Council could waive the normal filing deadline to speed up the process. If legislative changes are desired, the staff could open up the zoning of the entire city, hold a series of NPO meetings, and hold public hearings before Planning Commission and the City Council with direction that the needed housing units be recovered. Again, the filing deadline would need to be waived. Regardless of the options chosen, I believe that the process would take from 3 to 6 months to complete. I should caution that the 1983 plan completion followed a long and at times heated hearing process before final zoning designations were adopted. Many properties which may come under consideration have long histories of concerns and much negotiating went into the process before properties were zoned. Any attempts to change some property could lead to opposition. The staff looks to the Council for direction regarding this issue. ALBERTSONS' MEMO CPA 6-86, ZC 10-86 Page 4 Traff is The City Engineer has reviewed the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant and has the following comments: The traffic analysis submitted addresses the impacts of the proposed commercial development on existing traffic in the vicinity of Highway 99W and Durham Road. The report is thorough and provides the type of information we need in site development review. If the requested zone change is granted, the street improvements suggested by the traffic report will be included in the conditions of site development. The Engineer is satisfied that the proposed street improvements will accommodate the traffic from the proposed commercial development. However, at this point we are not reviewing a specific development proposal. We are, instead considering Comprehensive Plan changes to provide for additional development and to increase residential densities elsewhere. How will these zone changes impact the long-range traffic patterns and volumes in the area? How will the Durham/99W intersection function when the area is fully developed? Before these and other related questions can be answered, we need to know what areas are being considered for increased residential densities. Process The Council has revised options for process. They are: 1) Deny the application based upon the staff and Planning commission recommendation. 2) Approve the applicwtion and initiate the Comprehensive Pian changes suggested in the applicant's presentation. Condition the approval of the C-G designation upon successful completion of the other changes. 3) Conditionally approve the C-G designation delaying the effective date until the staff and Council' complete Comprehensive Plan changes which make up the lost densities. Council must direct staff in this area. 4) Table any discussion on this item until the staff and Council follow established procedures and initiate Comprehensive Plan changes to rezone a sufficient amount of land to make up the density which would be lost by approval of the C-G designation. A waiver of the 120 day approval period should be secured from the applicant. Council should indicate its direction on whether the application meets criteria of the Comprehensive Plan. 5) Deny the application and begin Comprehensive Plan Amendments to determine if a sufficient amount of land could be rezoned to offset a C-G plan change. ALBERTSONS' 'MEMO CPA 6-86, ZC 10-86 Page 5 Regardless of the option chosen, if the Council wishes to continue consideration of the proposal, staff should be directed to work with the { applicant's representative to evaluate traffic impacts at the site and any additional sites which become subject to rezoning. Impacts will differ based on where the density is concentrated. The staff recommends that the Council first decide if C-G is appropriate for the location. If the decision is no, deny the application. If the decision is yes, table a decision and direct the staff to begin evaluating sites or residential zoning designations for modification to regain the lost housing opportunities. Additional information will be provided to you at the November 17 meeting. Please bring your materials from the November 3rd meeting. Y ` 3 br/185 �, LBERT50NS' 'MEM0 CPA" 6-86, ZC 10-86 Page 6 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.1 OCTOBER 7, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 6-86 Zone Change ZC 10-86 REQUEST: Plan amendment from Low, Medium-Nigh, and High Density Residential to Commercial General and zone change. from R-4-5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre), R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre), and R-40 (Residential, 40 units/acre) to CG (Commercial General). APPLICANT: Albertsons, Inc. OWNER: James & Emma Fite 10230 SW Hall Blvd. Herbert & Betty Dayson Portland, OR 97223 H.C. & Amy Randall Gary & Nrdene Randall Donald & JoAnn Randall Health Resources Inc. william Brownson x LOCATION: South of Durham Road, east of Pacific Highway, and east of 113th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 15BA, TL 100, 200, 300, 400, and WCTM 2800, 2802, 2900, 3000, 3001, and 3002). 2. Background Information All but the northwestern tax lots are within Washington County. .. An annexation application has been submitted for . the remainder of the subject property (ZCA 8-86). it has been approved by City Council and is awaiting Boundary Commission review. Much of the property in this area south of Durham Road is not within the City. However, the area between Durham Road and the Tualatin River is under the planning jurisdiction of Tigard. 3. Vicinity Information The property on the north side of Durham Road and part of the Summerfield development within the area between Pacific Highway and Summerfield Drive are zoned R-25 (PD) (Residential, 25 units/acre, planned development) and committed to multifamily residential uses. The land adjacent to 113th Avenue immediately east and south of the subject property consists of scattered single family residences on small acreage . f== tracts. The .properties east of the subject property .are within the City and zoned R-25 while .the southern parcels are under County jurisdiction and intended for Low Density Residential development in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CPA 6-86/ZC 10-86 PAGE 1 ,� r The property south of the subject parcels are also within Washington C County and are designated for Medium Density Residential development in the City Comprehensive Plan and are developed with a mobile home park. King City lies on the west side of Pacific Highway. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The subject property, as noted above, consists of several separate parcels with the majority being occupied by a single family residence. The applicant proposes to change the Comprehensive Plan designation corresponding zoning to Commercial General to allow for the construction of a retail shopping center. If approved, a separate application and review will be required prior to developing the site. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposal and it is noted that specific access, street improvement, storm and sanitary sewer service, and signalization must be addressed during Site Development Review prior to construction on the site. The Building Division has no objection to the request. The State Highway Division states that Scenarios 2 and 3 in the applicant's traffic study appear feasible and that potentially detrimental traffic impacts can be addressed prior to development of the property. Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation made this statement: The following are our comments on the above-referenced applications for a site located on Pacific Highway, Durham Road, and SW 113th Avenue. Durham Road - Although this road has recently been transferred to the City of Tigard's jurisdiction, as part of that transfer it was agn,,=•3d that Durham Road would have a ' 90 foot right-of-way, a 44 foot paved width, and a 600 foot spacing standard. The site plan as submitted for comments does not reflect these requirements. In addition, a concrete sidewalk should be required for pedestrian access. SW 113th Avenue - Dedication of five feet of additional right-of-way. If access is proposed to this street, frontage improvements, including paving and sidewalks, would be required. Traffic Study - The access volumes leaving the site are too low, which could reduce the level of service at 99W and Durham. Within the, traffic study, the traffic ;analyst ' reduced the trip generation from the center by 40 F . rs_ STAFF REPORT CPA 6-86/ .10-06 10-86 PAGE 2 , percent in order to reflect the net increase onto {4_ the system by taking out drop-in trips. This is acceptable, however, reducing the new trips does not reflect the actual volume entering and leaving the shopping center. The actual access volumes would be the "drop-in" traffic plus the new traffic generated by this development. i The net impact is that the traffic pattern within this area would be altered because of this j development. Ripo kF, recommends denial of the proposal for the following reasons: a. The uncertainty of the southbound 99W left turn lane to handle the increased traffic. b. Adverse effect on the zone change upon established residential development. i c. Unnecessary commercial development in an area that is adequately served. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The applicant has presented findings which address the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines and the applicable policies contained in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. A traffic study prepared by ATEP. Inc. has also been submitted. The Planning staff analysis below does not discuss the State Goals since the City's Plan has been acknowledged. E The relevant criteria in this case are Plan policies 2.1.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.3, 5.1.4, 6.6.1, 7.2.1, S.i.l, 9.1.1, and the Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is only partially consistent with the Comprehensive -Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. 2. Policy 5.1.1 is met because the proposal will have a small positive effective upon the number of jobs available to Tigard residents. Since it will be similar to other commercial { developments in the Tigard area it will not "diversify" the local t economy. i 3. Policy 5.1.3 is not satisfied because creating new, large scale t commercial development located in the southwest toa•ner of the City ;. will not "in,p -ova or enhance" the central business district as the commercial fo�_.ail point for the City. Although the specific effect of this proposal may be debatable, it is certainly clear the developments of this type will not have a positive effect upon the vitality of downtown. The downtown has not enjoyed the same STAFF REPORT CPA;6 a861ZC 10-85. PAGE.3 economic growth which other areas of the community have in the past three years. Spreading commercial activity into areas which devewere pinned in 1983 3Of tto bescale toresidential, particularly would further holdback the in a Project revitalization of the downtown. q. Policy 5.1.4 is not totally satisfied because the eastern portion of the subject property is adjacent to residentially zoned land to the north, east, and south. This is considered to be encroachment as defined in the Locational Criteria discussed above. S. Policy 6.1.1 is linked to State Goal No. 10 and the Metro Housing Rule which requires that the average density allowed for all undeveloped residential land in the City be a minimum of ten dwelling units per acre. The adopted and acknowledged Comprehensive Plan and zoning provisions meet this figure but do not exceed it. The applicant correctly points out that several rezonir►gs have occurred since the adoption of the Plan which acted to raise the average density of available residential land. The applicant proposes that the density which is "lost" by rezoning this property from R-40, R-25, and R-4.5 to C-G can be recovered by the previous plan/zone change actions and by the City initiating a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allow for High Density Residential development on the P parcels ii-13�of the laPplicant's narrative more th and east of the subject property. g F fully explain this proposition. Though the staff has no objections of a procedural nature regarding taking credit for past density increases on other ' properties to justify the loss of the R-40 and R-25 zoning on the subject property, the staff has two reservations regarding the applicant's proposal. First, the area proposed for redesignation to High Density Residential cannot meet all of the applicable Locational Criteria because no direct access is available to a t collector or arterial street and the area has significant development limitations due to a large drainageway and steep slopes. Second, the City is presently reviewing alternate development methods projects involving natural hazards The outcome ofthis ood oth plains and reviewlmay affect the average residential density figures and the rezoning of this property for commercial use may make it more difficult to meet the City's obligation to Goal 10. Whether the City Council chooses to grant the applicant credit for prior density increase is a policy issue. No uniform policy has been discussed by the City. 6, Policy 6.6.1 calla for visual buffering between different uses such as commercial and residential. Although buffering issues are addressed during Site Development Review, it appears that adequate ; vide sufficient buffering. space is available to pro R 1 j { STAFF REPORT - CPA 6-86/ZC 10-86 - PAGE 4 7. Policy 7.2.1 is met because adequate public facilities (i.e., water, sewer) are available to the site. 8. Policy 8.1.1 is satisfied because the evidence suggests that the additional traffic generated by the proposed commercial use will not exceed the capacity of Pacific Highway and Durham Road. The State Highway Division and City Engineering Divisions have both reviewed the proposal and no problems are anticipated that cannot be resolved during the site Development Review process. 9. The applicable locational criteria or commercial general development are partially satisfied for the following reasons: a. The eastern portion of the property is adjacent to residentially zoned property on three sides when adjacency on a maximum of two sides is permitted. b. The commercial development of the site will not create unacceptable traffic congestion as discussed in finding 8 above. C. Direct access to an arterial and collector street is available. d. Public transportation is available on Pacific Highway. +s. The size of the site will provide adequate opportunities for buffering between the proposed project and residential uses. C. RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends denial of CPA 6--86/ZC 14-86 based upon the above findings and ^_^*tclusions. PREPARED BY: Keith Li en APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Community Development (KL:dj195/dj4) p fi. F S'fAFf REPORT CPA 6--86/ZC 10-96' — PAGE .5 POTENTIAL AREAS TO INCREASE HOUSING DENSITIES The following Proposal Areas are submitted on behalf of Albertsons' , Inc. in support of CPA 6-86 and ZC10-86. Representatives of Albertsons' , Inc. met with the City's staff to assist them in providing the City Council with practical alternatives to enable the City of Tigard to maintain its housing standard of 10 units per acre of buildable lands. The follo:•.ing list of alternatives is not exclusive, but represents eleven areas having the best likelihood for immediate density increases. 1 . Pacific Highway and S. W. Gravens Street - Tax Lot 100 an7_ 1300 a. Acres: 10.96 (This proposal excludes the lots abutting Graven Street and reduces the buildable area in Tax Lot 1300 by 6.34 acres due to flood- plain restrictions ) . C: b. Current Zoning: Unzoned; comprehensive map shows as Medium- High (R-25) . C . Comments : Abuts King City commercial zones and Medium Density residential . Development of the site would not produce traffic affecting the Durham Road traffic network . d. Proposed Change: R--40 e. Housing Increase: 164 units 2. 15400 S. W. 109th - Tax Lot 403 and Tax Lot x`.02 a. Acres: 7.43 (Landovmers requested by letter X: that 8.2 acres be rezoned to R-40 ) . b. Current Zoning R-3.5 x r - c. Comments: Landowners, Mr. and Mrs . Law, requested in a letter to the City Council on October 307 1986, that their land be rezoned to R-40. The land also abuts R-12, R-25 and the Summerfield PD. A zone change of this property to R-12 would provide a good transition in the area rom the R-.'_5 co neighboring properties. The land is also also served by Naeve Street, a collector, and 109th Street. The development of this property would be outside the Durham Road transportation network. d. Proposed Change: R-12. In the alternative, the land could be changed to R-25. e. Housing Increase: 1 . To R-12: 63 units 2. To R-25 : 160 units 3. S. tat. 109th Street near haeve Street - Tax Lots 100 200 , an a. Acres : 17.93 b. Current Zoning: R-3.5 C. Comments: The land abuts R-12 and is near R-25. T;ze land is also outside the Durham transport- ation network. d. Proposed Change: R-12. In the alternative, the land could be rezoned as R-25. e. Housing Increase: 1. To R-12: 152 units 2. To R-25 : 386 units n i �r .�i s, .,3 .j. w:> ;..:- t ..wg.;s •:%:v, _•K-�k- ?.,k.:ti#Vl.4, ud a-"a .Y:.. �f 4. S. kl. Haeve Street and Pacific Hi hway - Tar. Lot 700, and a. Acres: 201.21 b. Current Zoning : R--12 C. Comments: _ The land is The land abutscollector andmajorarter=al also served by h�•:aY streets : Naeve Street and pouldibelloutside Development of the property the Durham Road transportation network. ax d. Proposed Change: R-25. In the alternative,0 ; :�Tthe Lot ?00 could be changed to R- remainder of the property (Tax Lots 600 and ed to R-25• Vlis would 500) being Chang neighboring densi- provide a transition to ties. e• Housing Increase: 1. To R-25 : 315 units 2. To mix of R-40 and R-25 : 400 units 5. Beef pend Road and S. W- 116th Avenue - Tax Lots 16.00 an a. Acres: 5.95 The Comprehensive b. Current Zoning: Unzoned. Plan b. also fails to designate the property vaith any densities. It is assumethat lculationsl was used for vacant buildable lands C. Comments: ll Tne land abuts Beef Bend Road aacentuto Mountain Road. The i and also acif icis k Hight�►aY• R-40 and Commercia_ along would be outside of the property the Durham Road traffic network. d. Proposed Change: R-25 e, Housing Increase: 167 units f ,F E. Bull Mountain Road near McFarland Blvd. - Tax Lot 1200 a. Acres: 14.39 �Y b. Current Zoning : Unzoned. The land is also not designated under the comprehensive planning map and is assumed to be R-1 for vacant buildable lands calculations. C. Comments: The land is just west of R-40 and Commercial along Pacific Highway. The land is also outside the Durham Road traffic networ;: . d. Proposed Change: R-12. This change would provide a transition downward from the proposed change to R-25 as designated in the Proposes: Area No. 5 above. e. Housing Increase : 158 units z 7. Scholls Ferrx Road between 130th and 135th Streets - Tax Lo (Park) a. Acres: 35.33 approximately. b. Current Zoning : Unzoned. Comprehensive Plan designates property as Medium-High (R-25 ) . C. Comments: The property abuts Scholls Ferry Road, 130th and 135th Streets. The land is also adjacent to R-25 zoning to the west. The proposed change in zoning would only affect ti-13 northern portion of the lot above Summer Creek and Drainage Way (a total developable area of 25.5 acres approximately). The land is also outside the Durham Road traffic net- work. 1 4 d. Proposed Change: R-40 e. Housing Increase: 382 units. 3. Scholls Ferry Road and Lower Scholls Ferry Road - Tax Lots 104, 100, Par and Par a. Acres: 5.5 b. Current Zoning: R-25 C. Comments : The land abuts both Scholls Ferry Roads. The proposed change to R-40 would match the pro- posed change to R-40 in the Proposal Area Nlo. 7 above. Both of these properties are on the north side of Summer Creek drainage way in the vacant buildable lands area. d. Proposed Change: R-40 e. Housing Increase: 82 units 9. S. W. Hall and Sattler Road - Tax Lots 100 (Park. ) and a. Acres: 17.5 acres approximately. b. Current Zoning : R-4.5 C. Comments: The land abuts R-12 and R-7 zoning. The property is also served by Sattler as a collector. d. Proposed Change: R-12 e. Housing Increase: 131 units. 10. S. W. Hall South of S. W. Ross Street - Tax Lots 1100 MO and 1305 a. Acres: 22.12 b. Current Zoning: R-7 m -•C �`E}`�.w4r'Y u. W+re .+ j �b w'.sxs qa � rv.i.a, •iw C. Comments: The land abuts R-12 zoning on the west and south. The proposed change would also leave portions of the overall buildable lanes to the north and east as R-7 to serve as transition areas. d. Proposed Change: R-12 e. Housing Increase: 111 units. 11 . S. W. 92nd Avenue, near Cook Park - Tax Lot 900 a. Acres: 8.66 b. Current Zoning : R-4.5 C. Comments: The land abuts R-12, Cook Park and 92nd Avenue. A sizeable portion of vacant buildable lands to the east were recently changed to R-12 where they abut along Cook Park. The proposed change for Tax Lot 900 would extend the R-12 zoning along the northern perimeter of Cook Park for consistency in the zoning pattern and transition for the area. In addition, an increase in zoning at this spot could be arranged so as to phase out onto Cook Park with a minimum impact to lower densities abutting on the north of Tax Lot 900. d. Proposed Change: R-12 e. Housing Increase: 65 units t SUMMATION OF HOUSING DENSITY INCREASES FOR THE ELEVEN PROPOSED AREAS Minimum Density Maximum Density Proposed Area Change Option Chane Option 1 164 164 2 G3 160 3 152 386 n. 315 400 5 167 167 6 158 153 7 382 332 3 82 32 9 131 131 10 111 111 11 65 65 Total 1 ,790 units 2 ,206 units CNC^ 31 MAINTENANCE OF TEN HOUSING UNITS PER ACRE OF BUILDABLE LANDS STANDARD 4 Units A. ALBERTSONS' PROPERTY 1. Low Density (R-1 to R-4.5 ) 2-7 1 .65 acres (Tax Lots 2800, 2900) 2. Medium-High (R-25) 146 3 5.84 acres (Tax Lot 3000) a 3. High Density (R-40) 264 (Tax Lots 300 and 400 were not included in the buildable lands calculations as high density. In essence they were erroneously assumed as being already built upon lands. The correct acreage used in calculating High Density for the buildable 'Lands survey and the City's housing standard analysis was 6.59 acres). Corrected Total Housing Units Loss by Albertsons' Proposed Change to Commercial 412-417 B. CREDIT FOR PRIOR ZONING CHANGES City previously increased density opportunities after comprehensive plan was adopted and acknowledged (CPA 20-849 ZCA 13-84, CPA 6-85, ZCA 7-85) . 48 C. SHORTFALL NEEDED TO BRING TIGARD BACK TO HOUSING STANDARD OF 10 UNITS PER BUILDABLE ACRE 364-369 � ry` SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR DURHAM ROAD i Traffic evaluation of how many cars can be added to Durham Road } before the intersections fail? 4 Assumptions: After Albertsons, additional traffic will be from higher density residential apartments. A11 pm peak hour traffic generated by the additional hignabr or density residential assures will the worst oriented to HwY `ty case situation +or westbound. This intersection failure. hese assumptions, intersection capacity analysis was Pissed on t conducted he bath Hwy 99 and Main access driveway with Durham Road. It was determined that an additional 279 vehicles during the peab:: hour would cause both intersections to operate over capacity. This number of additional vehicles when backed into the trips generated by apartment units it was found that an additional 463 units would generate the 278 vehicles. CONCLUSION ents be built An he Albertsons development nbefore sity pthe mintersections would fail . �nd t NOTE: It should be noted that the 463 units would not all be leaving the complex at the pm peak hour and would not all travel in the westbound direction along Durham Road. 16king the above into account for trip generation, the actual number of apartments that could be built with access to Durham Road would be considerably higher i.e. (using a 50% distribution from the site, 50% go west, 50% go east the actual number of 900 units) . additional apartments could be over 1f _ REPLY TO ADDRESS iNDICATED: JIM SIMMONS ❑ Senate CrwnO" A8Eistart ROPLtUmn LAader Salem.Oregon 97910 WASHINGTON COUNTY :M 121W SW.Par 4 Drive x DISTRICT 4 Tigard,Oregon 97213 OREGON STATE SENATE SALEM, OREGON 97310 October 30, 1986 Tigard City Council Tigard City Hall 13125 S W Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 A p Gentlemen: T� It is my understanding that the Tigard City Council willhear lication an appeal from a Planning Commission decision on the app by Albertson' s Stores to build a shopping center near the intersection of S W Pacific Highway and Durham Road. During the sixteen years I have lived in King City, I have been well served by the Tradewell store in Canterbery shopping area, and by the Kienows store and other small merchants in King City Plaza. However, I do believe that experience in other areas has indicated that competition in providing shopping facilities has resulted in a better choice and better quality of merchandise and service. Presently, the North end of Pacific Highway through Tigard a is anchored by the Fred Meyer store. A store and center such as proposed by Albertsons might well serve as the Southern anchor, and stimulate the growth of Tigard in between. In urging you to consider favorably this application, I am assuming that the Tigard engineering staff in coordination with the Oregon Department of Transportation would require adequate facilities to safely handle whatever additional traffic might be developed by the shopping center. Tigard, Washington County and Oregon are all experiencing growth, and I think we should all do what we can to encourage such growth. Sincerely, r ; JIm Simmons oct. 8, 1986 City Council City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard OR 97223 Re: Albertson Application, File CPA 6-86 & ZC 10-86 Attention: Loreen Wilson, City Recorder We do not object to a shopping center at Pacific Highway and Durham Road, but we do want fair and reasonable treatment of t our interest in the McIntosh/Bishop property on S.W. 1i3th and Durham Road, in three particulars: 1. Avail our property with sewerage service at the same time that the shopping center is serviced. In a telephone iv- conversation with the project manager of Unified Sewerage Service in September, I was told that Albertsons will Kaye two options: one, to tie in with the Summerfield Trunk Line= and two, to tie into a line on Pacific Highway. We have waited several years, unable to develop our prop?rty a because TDC successfully delayed its contractual obligations to extend the sewer to Durham Road, making it available to our property. Now that litigation between TDC and USA has been resolved and the line can be extended. 11 No newcomer in the development of this area should have f sewerage service before those of us who have waited so long. Plans for extended sewerage service should include all of the relevant property south of D&rham road and east of Pacific Highway, not just Albertsons shopping center. . q 2. Keep shopping-center vehicular traffic off S.W. 113th s Avenue. The medium density zoning along S.W. 113th wi.11 create development that will produce enough extra traffic on that street. 3. Protect the aesthetic requirements of residential-zoned property east of the shopping center by creating a sight barrier between the commercial shopping center and its black-topped parking space and the residentially-zoned property on S.W. 113th avenue. 447 ` Sincerely AVaZTAAt44, ay1, rnccU; Donal W. McIntosh SR and Kathreen M. McIntosh i P.O. Box 8034 Black Butte Ranch OR 97759 V King City, Or Nov. 6, 1986 To the Tigard city council, I read the article that recently appeared in the Oregonian about the Albertson's wanting the Durham and 99 property and also hear a great deal of negative discussion herein King City and Summerfield. We sold homes sometimes reluctantly to move out here because it was the area and life style we wanted. But it seems we can't get away from things like Texaco car washes, ugly storage sheds and shopping centers other then King City's- Already the 116 th Duhram Rd areas are dangerously con - Bested at tunes. Summerfield has many available empty shops and yet the desire to add more congestion on that corner which is the entrance and exit at the north of Summerfield, King City streets are heavily used by outsiders coming down from the , ills and Beef Bend Rd useing Prince Albert and 11 6 th to shop, park and ridd• and ~rose over to 99 going south and also to the freeway 145• This is true in reverse also, We would indeed be thaj�ful if another shopping area would not be built on this corner and added to our congested and crossing through Problem. Thank you, Since ely, King City Or. 16550 S. W. 113th Tigard, Oregon 97224 Tigard City Council 13125 S. W. Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Valerie: Please give the Supermarket Complex (Albertsons) alot more thought and consideration. There are far too many buildings already in this area that have been empty-for the most part-at least five years or more. } We really do not need another market in this AREA. The markets or stores we have now are not that busy. Those of us living on 113th find that getting out onto Durham Road always requires extreme caution. There has been one death and many accidents on 113th and Durham Road. (on the exact corner of 113th and Durham Road) We have lived on 113th for 40 years and we choose to continue to live here as } long as we can preserve the quality of life we have known. It is quiet, low density and relatively safe. We'd like to keep it that way Very truly yours, s- orge U. Benz ar ret Benz GB:,b „i cc S t i 16550 S. W. 113th Tigard, Oregon 97224 November 10, 1986 Tigard City Council 13125 S. W. Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear John: 4 Please give the the Supermarket Complex (Albertsons) slot more thought and consideration. There are far too many empty buildings already in this area. These buildings have for the most part been empty for five years or more. WE really do not need another market in this area. The markets or stores we now have are not that busy. Those of us living on 113th find that getting out onto Durham always requires extreme caution. There has been one death and many accidents on 113th and Durham Road. WE have lived on 113th for 40 years and we choose to continue to live here as long as we can preserve the quality of life we have known. It is quiet, low density and relatively safe. WE'd like to keep it that way. Very truly yours, Ge ge & Ma garet Benz -•' fi GB.mb cc R r - i r - 1 , SIL 6 / ' , r - r M# /.5 UCS v�l�OGy , r. 4� l�� .�_-�..-- �� --�=s�.�--rte �'c7G�J .•fwd ry i r- v , } w F G,'�G,�eJC-G�e.-L- a1� --.�.`1-S,,Q ��C•�C�,.e=�-l'..�...� L��et;�-�-�.�.�..... • . ��.-Plc.-t �—�/'�' - F i1 • ` I to ono y � 4y a .c a•tawat6W.•t t a a F ....�s.....prµ..w..+....s....-:.r.-..a.. -.a, .... ...a... t..�.»...._........_-..:z,-.._._.-e—._....3-.�ra._,v....-...:._:.a-mow:.- :'--.».._..___.._.___..��..:....�.: ...r'r..-.....+.:A,...rw�..w.Ewr.'..:w+w•_su.,.....�...:._.•�•..a....,,..._....._,..r.+.-,..:...........r....w-.w..:,_..._:w.a.._:;s...:.,1..�_�..a�...+i ..'K..•:..-.a........._._._....,__....,�. :. �...-....,...,.a.�-w�+r►..r...,t.r:_.....i......aw..v4,.-.a..�....+'..+.�+._.:.....::...�,....... ._ _ _..i.�..,.._w.........:....w.....��....u..___ �:..�.-....._ .,,._._.....�....._,:.._.<..Y. .._. -mow � yir.......+.�r.�wiv :-a�.wi.+.:u..+.......w«.:�..........,._�,..,..u.�a.:.r...+...uae.o�»:v........._....w�+.+an•:`.�. .._—..._..._.wL...awws.ms_.rs..a..........-...:_-..�...:-a...:_.s.oF.wv:::o..............-...-.-...�._..�...�..._�:,._...s-' .�e+,-+•..�.:.1ws.*{�{•or.•,.uc.+•.�w...... ........._,,.,,�._.,...«...:,.t...:rww4ir...-;�r+Y�M�ii ".:+1.M......+r..ty.'w...-awe+M^.i-.:v..�+. fw:.��criiw�a..wv:a_...�+.e..:,�rw.-.++.i.-�.-..r..-_. -- -,.........,..._...,.a✓•.:-.+.c.t ..�:......,+..u...:+�rrrr...+�a�.wuo.�+rw.e++r[+�*"}4+ervww,+�...rn,i,t+Yn'y.+rA�w _. '_..r-..r:±r.ct+�w..�lav xis•+«..-..4Mr..a�...____..._+......,..�.�.........,......w....+.+.-.++�a•o.•..Yuv'- . ry R # � � :�tYefN+ " l�:':. a�-c,.n,..c,._'..:__�_:.�m riiwM.:.r•a..�n�rw4'nirw4s4d.u..�r..._ wrw....�,-� t t , x� ,� i� , ��►�-�,�-rev ././..�� oll ..a.� .,�. .� CL /s//`��' Ap r s. -Xy':'`�p.. .$ i IOU 000, 4 ''� �...._� � :- �.. q,`y. -»'r �, - •�icr:� �-y x - a £.,�.,, t �. -sem +' ; � ;-�,,,�,�8{; �t- -; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 17, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 7, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Tigard Triangle PREVIOUS ACTION: Traffic Circulation Study PREPARED BY: Randall R. Wooley DEPT HEAD OKjdM CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE Review of the traffic circulation plan for the Tigard Triangle area. INFORMATION SUMMARY The transportation analysis for the Tigard Triangle area has been completed. A copy of the report is attached. The report reaches the following conclusions: 1. The Tigard Triangle can be developed in accordance with the tend uses and street patterns shown in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Traffic will remain at acceptable levels of service within the Triangle and on adjoining streets if certain street improvements are completed. The report outlines the improvements needed. 3. The improvements can be staged over the next 20 years or more as development occurs. The report describes the improvements needed at various stages of development. 4. The level of service on Highway 99W will remain about the same as it is today. As more local traffic uses 99W, through traffic will divert to other roads (such as the Tualatin-Sherwood Road). It is assumed that 99W in the Triangle area will be widened during the next ten years to provide six through traffic lanes; this assumption is ( consistent with current planning by the State for 99W. (NOTE: Widening of 99W between I-5 and Route 217 requires little additional right-of-way. Recent development has been designed with room for future widening. In some locations, the pavement for an additional lane is already in place.) 5. An additional roadway between the Triangle and Hunziker Street may be required in the future. The need for this street and its appropriate alignment will depend on the final design of the Highway 217/1-5/Kruse Way interchange revisions. (NOTE: The State Highway Division has begun preliminary engineering work on the' proposed new interchange. When the I-5/217 interchange is reconstructed, it will probably also be necessary to revise the ramp configuration at the 217/72nd Ave. interchange. Reconstruction of the 72nd overpass may be necessary. Planning for these projects will occur over the next two years.) 6. The improvements described in the report are adequate to maintain existing levels of service. If the City wants to upgrade levels of service, the report suggests that the City consider other programs (such as promoting carpooling or improving transit service). Suggested programs are included in the recommendations on page 12 of the report. At the November 17th meeting, we will be prepared for a general discussion of the report but not a detailed review of the technical material. If the Council should wish to discuss in detail the technical aspects of the study, we would request a future meeting be scheduled with the engineering consultant. The report provides data to be used in future planning for the Triangle and for preparation of our Public Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. It provides data which can be utilized immediately in preparing the final plans for the Dartmouth Street LID. t G 1 Tigard Triangle Traffic Circulation Study ' Summary Sheet for November 17, 1986 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ' s J No formal action is required at this time unless the Council wishes (1) to challenge any part of the report; or (2) to direct additional study, or (3) to basin implementation of any of the programs described in Item a of the recommendations on page 12 of the report. 's t I i FISCAL IMPACT The report confirms and supports the Comprehensive Plan; so, there are no new impacts at this time. Cost estimates for the various street improvements will } be developed as part of the Public Facilities Plan. i_ That the Council review the report as an important information document in the City's ongoing planning process, but that no formal action be taken at this time. 4 /br1e2 i }} 5 i P`"z� _ .•• t'',�« x,' + ,1..s- y, s`*p'+'u a �r-ta ,.tx . "+k { s' 65� 72nd currently functions as a collector street and runs between Highway 217 and Highway 99 to the north. 72nd should be improved to a 66' Right of Way and a 42' improvement as shown in sketch dl. This would handle traffic through the "build out" scenario when additional through lanes will be required. (see "build out" improvement requirements) 72nd Avenue should be connected to Highway 99W at the present Fred Meyer Traffic signal . City engineering staff has reviewed this extension and indicates that it is possible to construct this connection without much difficulty. Dartmgth as proposed will function as a collector street until the "build out" scenario occurs. At that time Dartmouth will function as an Arterial Street due to the direct connection to Highway 99W and Interstate 5. As a collector Dartmouth should be constructed as a 3 lane facility with two through lanes and a continuous left turn lane as shown in sketch di. By the 2005 scenario, additional lanes will be required at certain intersections and the street should be developed to full arterial street status as shown in sketch d2. (see year 2005 improvement requirements) . 69th and 70th Avenues are currently unimproved streets and serve local residences only. When development occurs in this area, the street should be improved to the minor collector street status as shown in sketch dl. STREET SECTION IMPROVEMENTS STREET 1996 1995 2005 BLD OUT a�ssssasaasssass�sassasass:ssaasasaaammaesassosam:assaas:nsaaasas Hampton Street dl d1 di dl 68th Parkway di dl d2 d2 69th Avenue dl dl di dl 70th Avenue di dl di dl 72nd Avenue dl dl dl d2 Dartmouth n/a dl d2 d2 dl - MAJOR COLLECTOR WITH CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE 5' 1 5' 1 15' 1 12' 1 15' 1 5' 1 5' - - SW PLANT TRAVEL TURN TRAVEL PLANT SW �4 d2 - 4-LANE ARTERIAL WITH CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE 5' 1 5' 1 12' 1 12' 1 14' 1 12' 1 12' 1 5' 1 5' C ------- ----------- -------------—----------------------------- SW PLANT TRAVEL TRAVEL TURN TRAVEL TRAVEL PLANT SW E i t IMST IBS SNOU I6SFEI9 GIOGMII9H 9INDY PgDE i� t r S . • y �� , r - O GINEEr' _ CITYOFTIIFAPD i OREGON 25 Yew w tp x cr.An Z> r rau .: o r t ov x GAR Z? I'R 2 AN GL E T1�2AFly'2 C C!X RCL..TLAT2 ON STVZ.DY Prepared for The City of Tigard, Oregon 3 i i A JOINT VENTURE BY 4 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 6 PLANNING, INC. AND MORGAN, RYAN d ASSOCIATES, INC. �f 86=239 OCTOBER, 1986_. cur. OE T 1'BAItR- OR� sm TISAND TRZ*NOLE T RSFFtC CIRCULATION STUDY TABLE OF_CONTamrs INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SASICASSUMPTIONS• • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • 1 STUDYPROCEDURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 TRANPL.AN. . . . . . . . . . _ a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .►. . . . . . . . . . . 5 EXISTINGTRAFFIC VOLUMES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 EXISTING ROADWAY 'DEFICIENCIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .T SCENARIOANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0000 - 011 ( RECOMMENDATIONS. « . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 APPENDIX. . . . . . . . . . . . . 34[ '.vT. �+4n -. h� V --. ��54' 3-E Ak�C •. �i ,�p�}v+-.. F T t cTTy OF ZT-gWD, OREGON City of Ticard 3'1ca d Triancle Tgaffic Circulation Study October 30, 1986 INTRODUCTION This Circulation Study is part of an overall Transportation Planning Process by which all types of major transportation facilities and services are considered. This report will deal primarily with streets, but will consider as well the role of alternative modes of transportation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the future street needs within the Tigard Triangle Area. This area contains approximately 337 acres and is bordered by The Pacific Highway (99W) on the northwest, Highway 217 on the southwest, and Interstate 5 on the east. This study was conducted by the Traffic Engineering firm of Associated Transportation Planning and Engineering, Inc., (ATEP) and the Urban A Planning firm of Morgan, Ryan a Associates, Inc., (MRA) . This study performs the following transportation planning functions: 1. Identification of the present circulation patterns by traffic volumes. 2. Identify future circulation patterns by traffic volumes. 3. Identify present roadway deficiencies affecting circulation. !. Identify potential future roadway deficiencies affecting circulation. 5. Develop specific street and circulation plans for the City's future street system that meet the City's stated goals and policies, and that minimize the deficiencies in the street system. BASIC ASSUMPTIONS In order to carry out this transportation planning process, several assumptions are necessary for the prediction of future traffic volumes and distributions within the Tigard Triangle Area. Many of these f assumptions are based on earlier and current transportation planning work in the area, including work performed by METRO, Carl Hutke, Mayne Kittleson, and CH2M-Hill. These assumptions are listed below: z 1. No major improvements will be made after the recently completed �rrQirtD TRI OLE S°Ra�'r�' �r�ar�tL�L+i'YON "amy,, PROS ] 1 ` T ' � 1 CITY OF TIGARD ORNGONr interstate 5 widening. Highways 99W and 217 will be widened to six lanes each toward the end of the planning period. 2. The land within the Tigard Triangle Area will develop in accordance with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This includes conversion of much of the existing single family development to more intense uses, and the development of a significant commercial area extending from Highway 99W southeasterly into the central portion of the Triangle. F. 3. The development of this area will occur over time. It is assumed that more intense development will still be primarily located near the highways in the early part of the planning period, and that Intense development of the central area will not occur until the and of the period. 4. The developable land will generate traffic at the same rates as similar land developments nationwide, and these rates will not change over time. 5. The mix of single occupant vehicles, multiple occupant vehicles, transit ridership, and other alternative modes of transportation, will remain constant unless otherwise indicated in the various alternative scenarios. 6. Level of Service "E" will be the target for evaluating and planning for the street system. 7. By 2000, the Tigard Triangle Area will achieve 60 percent build-out and by 2005, it will achieve 70 percent build-out. 8. Population and employment growth will occur as described in the Study Area Growth Projections section below. Population and Employment Projections tables are included in the appendix of this report. 9. The business properties fronting Highway 99W will continue to have direct access to the Highway and will not cause traffic loading on the internal streets of the area. 10. sixty percent of all trips generated within the study area will be oriented to Highway 99W. The remaining 40 percent will be oriented toward Highway 217 and Interstate 5 via the 72nd Avenue/Highway 217 interchange or the Haines Road/Interstate 5 - interchange. 11. The new retail development within the Tigard Triangle Area will attract 30 percent of its trips from within the triangle, and 70 percent from without. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan also contains more general assumptions regarding: transportation. These are listed below and are all taken into n: account n this traffic circulation study. r= 1. Because of the diverse number of vehicle trips per day that are X. .. c 1 f CITY OF -TIGARD, OREGON ' taken by Tigard residents, the automobile will remain the most dominant source of transportation. 2. Many of the primary (collector streets) transportation corridors within the City of Tigard are currently developed below city standards, and thus inadequately service both current and future traffic demands. 3. With the City of Tigard there are numerous employers with over fifty (50) employees and not all of the employees of these firms reside within the Tigard City Limits. 4. People will become increasingly more energy conscious because of continuing high fuel prices. This factor may increase public transit ridership. It is assumed that most of this transit travel will be from Tigard to Portland's core area and not in increase in inter-Tigard trips. 5. Bicycle and pedestrian pathway systems will result in some reduction of automobile trips within the community. These modes of travel could replace short vehicle trips for shopping purposes. 6. Transportation planning for the City of Tigard must be conducted in cooperation with other local and regional Jurisdictions e.g., Washington County and the Metropolitan Service District (NSD) . 7. Social and environmental concerns will continue to influence transportation routing and development. S. Most of the population and employment growth during the planning period (1980-2000) will occur in the suburban areas rather than the Portland urban core; thus putting more pressures on the suburban transportation systems. It may also have the effect of creating longer trips, i.e., a person lives in Tigard and commutes to work in Portland. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan contains Policies on transportation planning (page II-56) . The first policy is directly relevant to the Tigard Triangle Area and is quoted below: 8.1.1 The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. The Plan also contains a discussion of the street system in the Triangle area (page I-234) . This discussion is quoted below: The needed collector connections within NPO 04 are located within the Triangle Area. The adopted NPO 14 plan Indicates the connections for this area that are needed to (` provide Job access to the commercial and industrial `- development areas. These inner Triangle Collector links include: .F 1'RI�lNQLg ZRAPFZCz$c�I . B'.1wr PAGE3 CZTY OF TIGARD. OREGON .® z 1. A connection between Pacific Highway at 78th south to Dartmouth. Although the exact alignment of this collector connection has not been determined, it is anticipated the alignment will continue in a southerly direction from Pacific Highway and then east to the existing Dartmouth right-of-way. This connection will be continued to I-5 via the new I-5/Haines Road interchange. 2. A connection in the form of a loop road from 69th westerly to 72nd, to the Dartmouth connection, til above) then south in an easterly direction to Hampton; and 3. A connection from N2 above to Atlanta tG be aligned with 68th. To complete the collector system in the Triangle area, the following streets must be upgraded to minor collector standards; 68th, 69th, and 70th. Each of these proposals from the Plan were incorporated into the alternatives being studied. fi=X PiWaxam The following steps where used in the development of this study: 1. Inventory - Existing count and circulation pattern information was gathered from the Tigard, Metro, and Oregon Department of Transportation staffs. Extensive additional manual and hose counts were taken throughout the study area. The city's current land use inventory was updated where necessary. 2. projections The Tigard Triangle Area was broken down into areas which were mapped in transportation analysis zones (TAW based on similar existing and future land uses. several scenarios were developed for future street patterns in the area, generally dealing with the construction and configuration of the Dartmouth Drive extension, and the 68th Street extension. The Tranplan computerized traffic forecast model was used to project future traffic volumes and circulation patterns for 1995, and 2005. The METRO SHM6 2 transportation model was used to determine the Full Build Scenario. �i 3. Analysis The Tranplan projections of volume and turning movements were compared to the capacities of existing and planned facilities to determine deficiencies. For each scenario, determinations of level of service were made for critical intersections based on the alternative street layouts. t Identified problem areas, which generally involve intersections, were analyzed in detail to determine if there were alternative configurations that would lead to improvements in service. 4. Recommendations The circulation scenario that demonstrates the greatest efficiency in moving traffic though out the entire Tigard Triangle Area was selected as the recommended system. TRANP� L'AN Y The Tranplan battery of transportation planning programs was used to analyze various future development scenarios. Each of these scenarios Is based on either different growth rates, different land development patterns, and/or different- roadway layouts. The Tranplan software package was used to develop a traffic simulation model that would provide a representation of existing and projected t traffic volumes within the Tigard Triangle Area. To accomplish this, a } street network was developed for use with the software. A cursory land use/parking survey . was conducted concurrently with the coding to determine the existing population/employment distribution within the study area. Aerial photographs were also used in the coding process. This survey was used in conjunction with the 1983 population and employment data that was provided by METRO. Calibration of the Tigard Triangle Traffic Simulation Model consisted of r matching 1985 ground counts with volumes projected by the model. Once the model projected reasonable volumes for the base year, a new street network was coded to simulate the 1995, 2005 and Full Development street € systems. Cordon (gateway) traffic projections from METRO were used with the 2005 Scenario. Cordon projections for 1995 were developed under the assumption of a steady growth between 1985 and 2005. Full Development cordon volumes were assumed to be capacity of the streets feeding into the study area. During the calibration process the traffic generation rates were taken from the ITE Manual. This is consistent with both the Oregon Department of Transportation and METRO's methodology for making traffic projections. A single purpose trip table was used in projecting traffic volumes for this study. �'ZMD 'TRI1ilDAN 'TRAFFIC CIROffiArInu B'TUDY _ RAGE-& CITY OF TIGARD, ORKGON The trip rates that were used for all scenarios were based on the MSD model. Included in the appendix of this report is an excerpt from METRO's planning documents that was provided to ATEP for use in this study. This document details the generation rates. Similar trip rates were used for the full development scenario with the exception of Commercial-General and Commercial-Professional land uses. Trip generation rates from a publication entitled "Development and Application of Trip Generation Rates" (FHWA, January, 1985) were used for these categories. These rates consisted of 462.4 and 296.64 trips per acre respectively. A capacity restrain incremental loading was used to distribute projected traffic volumes for the various scenarios on the simulated street network. The following street capacities were used for this purpose: High Volume Arterial (99W) 35,000 vpd Major Collector w/ turn lanes 16,000 vpd Major Collector w/o turn lanes 10,000 vpd Residential Street (improved) 4,000 vpd Residential Street (unimproved) 1,000 vpd It was assumed that the traffic volumes on 99W were near or at capacity and, as a result, volumes along this corridor will not change. Finally, the two primary routes that were tested (68th/69th Street extension from Hampton Street to Highway 99W, and the Dartmouth/78th Street connection from I-5 to 99W) were coded with a continuous left turn lane. r BELA Na TRAFFIC VOLUMES ATRP gathered detailed information on existing traffic volumes in the Tigard Triangle Area by using counts taken by the City of Tigard, the Oregon Highway Division, and METRO. These were extensively augmented by hose and manual counts taken by the ATEP staff. The counts deal with both volumes and turning movements. The results of these counts are shown on Map 1. The counts showed an existing overall traffic pattern as shown on Map 2. These arrows and percentage figures show the general direction of travel demands to and from the Tigard Triangle Area. Each -of the streets within the Tigard Triangle Area is classified as either an arterial, collector, or local street for the purpose of this analysis. These classifications are based on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan designations. Each of these classifications is described below: ARTERIAL STREET - The primary function of an arterial street is to provide for the traffic movement between areas and across portions of a city or region, direct service to principal generators, and connect to the freeway/expressway system. A subordinate function is the provision of direct access to adjacent land, however this function is highly discouraged. Since the primary function of this type street is movement of vehicles rather than access to abutting land or parking, arterial streets are subject to sra �a r�i � a re�anrrc crn�►rrox srunY p � ., i wo 000 6 to Ur X448--r� -�-I 6 I.IAINEg RD. J? < .-120 0AATMouTW zT. '9 P6ANK4I04 'ST. a. co � 2214 q ; '2495--0• 9 = WAMPTOM ST. M r 'PIOAI%P ' RIAA.d" CIACtJLiTfom 'bTuoy p 1985 AVERA&E DAILY TOTAL � T RUFF I G VOLUMES (A" �4 Up �, 7 .. 30% gq� WAINE•5 AD. > DAATMOUTH IZT- PJI4AgKLiN ST. W> H d u�MR7®N WT. r Tl*AF�a wrRIAN*LA C1A0vr.A71014 WrUPY '.x EX i s'P 1316 Tf�AFF1G 'VOLUME pI5TPi1®UTIOa r CITY OIC` TIG D OREGON - i regulation and control of parking, turning movements, entrances, exists and curb cuts. Control of access may also be required. Traffic volumes generally range between 5,000 and 35,000 vehicles per weekday. COLLECTOR STREET - Functions to conduct traffic from activity centers and neighborhoods to arterial streets. It is a principal traffic carrier within a neighborhood, and also provides access to abutting land. The average weekday volume could range between 2,000 to 8,000 vehicles per day. LOCAL STREET - Provides access to abutting land. These streets ;serve local traffic movements and are not intended to accommodate through traffic. The traffic volumes would be less that 2,300 vehicles per weekday in residential area, and may be somewhat higher in commercial or industrial areas. The traffic counts indicate, based on the above definitions, in what street classification the following streets are operating: ARTERIAL STREETS Highway 99W Highway 217 Interstate 5 COLLECTOR STREETS Hampton Street 68th Parkway 72nd Avenue All other streets in the Triangle Area are designated local streets. I&XIsTINg ROAD AY DR7ICIBNCTRS Capacity Analysis ATEP has inventoried the existing transportation system for those elements necessary for the circulation of the roadway's capacity, "Design Capacity" of any roadway is based upon the following factors: 1. Lane width 2. Shoulder width 3. Humber of lanes d. Speed zones and constraints 5. Intersection controls 6. Parking restrictions 7. Roadside obstructions The impact of traffic volumes is governed by the location of least capacity. As a roadway's traffic volumes approach their maxi, that ratio is generally expresses as a Level of Service (LOS) . The roadway's ability to carry vehicles compared to the congestion created is the A�'�IC `CIS 1� 921MY -Pj= 7 CITY OFTIGARD, 0 820" primary factor in determining LOS, as they are described in Exhibit 1. EXHIBIT 1 LEVELS OF SERVICE Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. Level .A - (V/C < .5) - Relative Free Flow No delay due to other vehicles. Level B - (WC > .5 & < .6) - Stable Flow - Slight Delay An occasional delay due to other vehicles. Level C - (V/C > .6 & < .7) Stable Flow - Acceptable Delay. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted, but not objectionable so. Level, D - (V/C > .7 & < .S) - Approaching Unstable Flow - Tolerable Delay. Vehicles may be delayed during peaks with the peak period. Level E - (V/C > .8 & < .9) - Unstable Flow, Congestion, Intolerable Delay During peak period, there will be long queues of vehicles, and delays may be great. Level F - (WC >.!) - Forced Flow - Jammed The traffic system has basically broken down. Generally, street systems have been planned to operate at LOS *D" at worst. However, inflationary effects on the costs of construction and right-of-way have forced many 'cooanities, Tigard included, to design , Instead for LOS "Bt*. The inconvenience that the LOS "S" situation creates at peak traffic periods is considered a valid trade-off for the costs of construction and impacts on the surrounding areas. Chart 1 illustrates the present traffic volumes and current capacities CITY OF TIGARI? OREGON of the major streets in the Tigard Triangle Area. It can be seen that, at the present time, all internal streets are operating below designed capacity. CHART 1 Tigard Triangle Area Traffic Circulation Study CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND CAPACITIES Provided by Oregon State Highway Division PRESENT PRESENT VOLUME/ TRAFFIC DESIGN CAPACITY STREET VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO --------------------------------------------- INTERSTATE 5 45000 50000 0.90 HIGHWAY 9961 37000 35000 1.06 HIGHWAY 217 57200 35000 1.63 68TH 1165 10000 0.12 72ND north 3994 10000 0.40 72ND south 9800 10000 0.98 HAINES 2973 10000 0.30 DARTMOUTH 2411 10000 0.24 HAMPTON finest 3126 4000 0.78 HAMPTON east 829 4000 0.21 ACKNA3 I0 ANALYSIS The scenario used for the initial analysis is based on the City's projected development for the Triangle area. This involves a change to commercial and industrial/commercial development patterns with more extensive commercial use along Highway 99 and the proposed srtmouth extension. The industrial/commercial development is typified by the various "business park" developments currently within the area and also found to the east along Kruse Way. The model results are shown in Table 2 on the next page: aArlu�sym< e � Tgp_ C eI ?It7N _ 4- TABLE 2 Tigard Triangle Area Traffic Circulation Study TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS FOR MAJOR INTERNAL STREETS 1995 2005 BUILD-OUT 68TH-N. of Dartmouth 81140 11,140 24,400 68TH-S. of Dartmouth 40200 7,710 22,000 69TH-S. 99 8,915 13,700 15,700 72ND-N. of Dartmouth 2,230 4,800 8,801 72ND-8. of Dartmouth 9,340 10,800 11,550 HAINES 41290 6,250 7,700 DARTMOUTH-S.of 99 7,630 12,200 21,500 DARTMOUTH-R.of 72nd 7,460 10,400 33,000 DARTMOUTH-W.of 72nd 7,970 10,300 21,500 HAMPTON-W. of 68th 41,000 5,000 7,000 HAMPTON-8. of 68th 600 1,000 1,800 Using Tranplan and the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual Planning Method of intersection analysis, each major intersection was analyzed to determine level of service for each of the projection years, for peak hour flows, and to determine intersection improvements that would be necessary to maintain a Level of Service of "B" or bettor. The major intersections are listed below with their LOS levels, based on the above projections: CHART 3 Tigard Triangle Area Traffic Circulation Study LSvgL OF 8xRVIC2 PROJECTIONS FM MAJOR INTZRSSCTIONS WITHOUT IVT=szCTION IMPROV6MZNTS 1995 2005 BUILD-OUT 72th i 99W 8 B F 69th a 99W Z 8 F Dartmouth A 99 E B g Dartmouth i 72nd B B 8 Dartmouth i 68th A B B 72nd i Hampton A B B 68th A Hampton A A A g: air CITY OF TZGMQ_ 06MN - - CHART !4 Tigard Triangle Area Traffic Circulation Study LEVEL OF SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR MAJOR INTERSECTIONS WITH INTERSECTION IHPROVEMENTS 1995 2005 BUILD-OUT Dartmouth & 99 S $ E 72th & 99W E E E 69th & 99W E E E Dartmouth & 72nd A B D Dartmouth & 68th A A C 72nd & Hampton A A B 68th & Hampton A A D The street improvements referenced in Chart 4 include developing Dartmouth extension and 69th extension with continuous left turn lanes. See the Technical Appendix for complete lane configurations. (f f}f(E(E t CONCLUSIONS i The analysis above demonstrates that most of the Tigard Triangle Area can be developed without extraordinary street improvements as long as a methodical system of making the necessary intersection improvements is Implemented. It is evident that the interface of the Triangle area with Highway 99W Is and will continue to be a traffic problem area. However, ODOT, working in conjunction with ATEP, has determined that Levels of Service will be maintained at LOS "z" despite increased traffic generation from within the Triangle. Highway 99Y will evolve into providing more of a local access sole, with through trips diverted to other routes, thereby stabilizing the total volume. The other routes impacted will most likely be Interstate 5 as traffic moves south instead of turning west on Highway 99, and Highway 217 and Tualatin-Sherwood Road which will "pick up" the diverted east/west flow. The primary conclusions of this study are: 1. The development of the Tigard Triangle will not create traffic volumes or patterns that will create an unacceptable level of service within the Triangle or on any of the three surrounding major highways. 2. Conclusion 1 is predicated on the creation of intersection Improvements,. primarily left turn lanes, at each of the intersections with Highways 99W and 217. 2. Level of Service "B" will be maintained on Highway 99W despite the Increase in trips generated within the Triangle. These new trips ZOARe TR dGA'' IC"CI [xltl\'PIOl�t 'e'rmJX _ FAQs 11 12ITX OF Trr_,An_ 0RAfi0N will serve to divert through trips to alternative routes, thereby stabilizing the total volume. These conclusions indicate that development of the Triangle can proceed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan with only the traffic related constraint of cremation of the intersection improve- ments. It is pointed out, however, that this only creates an acceptable situation. For Tigard to actually improve the situation, more drastic measures will be needed. These measures must focus on employment rofated trips, and the reduction of these trips on the highways during the peak hour. sased on the above analysis and the data gathered during the course of this study the following recommendations are made. 1. Development proceed within the Triangle in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intersection requirements, as described earlier in the report, be developed at the intersections of Dartmouth and 69th with Highway 99W. 3. The City explore the possibility of an additional route providing access to the Triangle and oriented to employee trips. This may Involve a new overcrossing of Highway 217 and connection to an appropriate street south of 217 such ' as Hunziker. The determination of an appropriate route was not considered as part of this study since its location will depend greatly on the Oregon Department of Transportation improvements to the Hwy 217/ I-5/Lake Oswego interchange. d. Tigard should develop a multi-pronged approach to improve, rather than just stabilize, traffic flow in this area. This program could include some or all of the following techniques: a. Broadening the Peak Hour - The volume that would normally flow in and out of the Triangle during the peak hour can be "spread-out" over a longer period of time. The City could mandate "flex hours" for employees in the area so that starting and quitting times range over a two to three hour period each. This can be obtained directly through ordinance, or more indirectly through the land use approval process for individual uses. c. increase Density of Riders per Car - Despite the Comprehensive Plan assumption that carpooling and other forms of alternative modes will not increase during the planning period& these may be the most viable answer to the congestion , problem. It is suggested that Tigard begin an active and aggressive alternative modes program that • will involve promotion of ridesharing for all current and future employees in the-: �•.a,+rrr g �m9r PANS 1� _earn �k � , CITY OF TZ GARD, OREGON Triangle area. The program should involve two components: encouragement for carpooling, and incentives for the business owner. The encouragement should come in the form of the City providing carpool matching services, educational programs, and general promotion for ridesharing. The incentives for the business owner should involve such things as credits for parking spaces for the provision of a permanent business-supported or mandated rideshare program, or assistance in obtaining tax credit for setting up vanpool programs for employees. d. Increase Use of Mass Transit - Again, despite the Comprehensive plan, a significant increase In Tri-Met ridership into the Triangle Area would make a significant difference in congestion level*. The City is encouraged to be very aggressive in its dealings with Tri-Met to help assure that demands for internal transit circulation within Tigard, and particularly into the Tigard Triangle Area, are met by Tri-Met. If they cannot be, the City could consider creation of its own "shuttle service", with park a ride lots located outside of the Triangle area and convenient shuttle service into the Triangle's employment centers. These recommendations, if all followed, would result in the minimization of congestion along the Triangle's northwest border. Any one of them could also achieve this goal by itself. However, the social impacts of an effort to implement any single one solution would probably be significant. An aggressive position by the City on three fronts is probably the most viable avenue. First, the City should work to have the internal street system within the Triangle completed, including the necessary intersection Improvements with Highway 99W. This work should be performed in advance of or along with major development in the area. Second, the City should look to the development comarunity to assist in Improving on this situation. Participation in street projects and Implementation of flex hours and ridesharing need the full support of the developer and employer. The developer and the employer should be made to realize that it bears a responsibility to assist the Community In this way if it wants to locate in the Triangle Area. Third, the City must continue to encourage greatly increased transit service and ridership into the area. This may be accomplished though the decisions of the Tri-Met Board of governors, or through the City's own provision of transit service. g rr rBarfiM rR ►icr:rvnart sit .®13 a w • 1 HAMPTON T 2.1° DAF+TMOUTN 'HWY-99 1 VAR+TMOUTA 72N0 HWY 99 4 .&919 __,i 2 WAY 4 WAY HnMPTQN to9Ti ?I.GARD TRIANGLE CMCUl:ATION ST.UD`Y. a R�QUlP�MENTg ,� _ . �,R . • �+TILA01UTH toST� r e / `R HAtAnON -7omP TMOU7g Hwy 99 .._�' OARTMOUTI 72N0 HWY 99 4 _b9T9 !�2 WAY � 4 WAY STOP STOP r HAMPTON . toBT' Hb.INES to9T� T(GA RD TNANGLE CIRCU I:AT I DRI - . ST.UD`( 1 ______IMPF.SOVEMEU'�'. FSE.GaUIt�MENTS_ i �.. 2005 �. ;dPSTMOUTH.. i A�t �r _HAMPTON 72fD OARTMOUTN 4 HWY-99 t r DARTMOUT44 Ut4o HWY 99 HAMPID IJ_. . �oBT HA.INES ._+ ._lo9TH _ 7IGARD :TRIANGLE CIRCULATION .- ST.UD" . N_lPP%oVr cliT.. P�QcsIP+�MENT�_ .� ._ lp: - �, • t T I t3AFtn -r Ft Y 13L-E G I zr-UL I ON £-3TUZyY TECHN I GAL- I X let" � 3 x • , ' .. city gem APPENDIX TIGARD CIRCULATION STUDY STRZET PLAN ARTERIAL STREETS Highway 99w Highway 217 Interstate 5 H 6-lah ma � Currently Highway 99W is a and left turn pockets. Proposed to be keep the level of service at LOS This improvement widened to operation through and not degradestheexOx istto ing traffic 9 this area. As traffic increases, the more keeping thevlevel t ache other arterriala in the LOS R. area thereby 6-1� an2is sCurrentl Highway 217 is operate at Lpgogogor sc be widened to tatate me time to come, study. A No improvements are to be considered as Part of this COLLECTOR STREETS The following streets streets within the Tigard aTriangle re eds to function ( ee street section dc)llector Hampton street 68th Street 69th Avenue 70th Avenue 72nd Avenue Collector S a east of 72nd Avenue currently development street. Since it serves thefunctions as Pment to the oast of 72nd Ave and is the existin e from the Triangle to H g office higher than a t �' 217 it la projected to carte ss point typical collector street. Y volume Currently it is a two lane roadway with left turn configuration will be changed anticipated the Pockets at the triangle occurs Sed until the future "build roadway required at and then additional left turn lanes will be the Hamptons intersections with 72nd and be (see build out improvements) 3 68th Avenues was Planned to function as Hampton and Haines Road. a collector street accommodate traf€ic in its The existing Improvement between f when additional present form until aomowill Improvement ui through lanes will be ter 1995 'nprovement req requirements) . required (see N2005p } ZF BZ DY CITY ii 2 ' 72nd currently functions as a collector street and runs between Highway 217 and Highway 99 to the north. 72nd should be improved to a 66' Right of way and a 42' improvement as shown in sketch dl. This would handle traffic through the "build out" scenario when additional through lanes will be required. (see "build out" improvement requirements) 72nd Avenue should be connectedtoo Highwity ay 99W at ndicatese tpresent Fred Heyer Traffic signal. his Is engineering possible. Dartmouth an proposed will function as a collector street until the "build out" ArterialoStreetoccurs. due to thethat direct� will function as an connection to Highway 99W and Interstate 5. as As a collector Darttwo through lanesuth dbe and aocontinuous leftaturn lane lane facility with t 9 as shown in sketch dl. the 2005 iailanes werequired certain ) .at certain intersectctions (seeYear 2005 improvment requir The remaining streets inside the Tigard triangle should be developed to minor collector street status as shown in sketch di. STREET SECTION IHPROVEHSNTS STREET 1986 1995 2005 BLD OUT r ssa:asrtssssssasssssussssssasssssasasssssssasasssssdsi:asosss Hampton Street dl dl d1 d2 s 68th Parkway dl dl d2 69th Avenue dl dl dl dl ?0th Avenue dl dl dl dl 72nd Avenue dl dl di d2 3 dl - MA.70R COLLECTOR WITH CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE _ 5+ 1 511 15' 1 12' 1 15' 1 5' ( 5' SW PLANT TRAVEL TURN TRAVEL PLANT SW r d2 - 4-LANE ARTERIAL WITH CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE 5' 1 511 12' 1 12t 1 141 1 129 I lZ' 1 50 1 51 ' SW PLANT TRAVEL TRAVEL TURN 'TRAVEL TRAVEL 'PLANT SW SIM 1.1=2 max . ' ° ....:.:.... .......u.sNJJuMhfis+ntiNhnN.:N.`..a.waww .::..wv'w.:.n:..•IuuiJHJJa:•J1.>I.XXNXWafawaiXMXI...X uwJr OPUU ATION/EMPLOYMENT 1983-2005 Population _ Employment 1983 2005 1983 2005 390 Zone Pte_ Pop. (Change) Chg. � Emp. (Ch_ ange) 8 Chane 130 1,585 1,077 (-508) -328 0 0 -- -- 213 1,803 1,706 (-97) - 58 0 0 -- '- 224 1,122 1,378 (+256) +238 281 321 (+40) + 148 225 1,319 2,215 (+896) +688 55 55 -- "- 228 2, 378 4,512 (+2,134) +908 1,549 2,374 (+825) + 538 227 414 2,203 (+1 ,789) +4328 40 299 (+259) +6488 111 336 335 -- -- 2,064 2,286 (+222) + 118 *226 363 363 -- -- 322 3,723 (+3,401) +1,0568 112 259 259 -- -- 1,272 1,533 (+261) + 21% 115 2,002 1,883 (-119) - 68 1,596 2,217 (+621) + 398 116 1,666 2,598 (+932) +568 172 923 (+751) +437% 128 1,488 1,996 (+508) +348 25 86 (+61) +2448 *129 853 781 (-72) - 88 1,904 2,362 (+458) + 248 Tigard Triangle. r TAX a xx a IA Z a z MP n`'` .� i '✓.+�# r- lac uz- ";. 4 r .a yG..'.wi.•"�r TIGARD TRIANGLE LAND USE INVENTORY - June, 1986 Zane Res ComPro ComGen School PGE i Total-- ---------------------i--------- ------------------------------------- 20.0 ------ 1 ; 20.0 --- 20.0 2 i 5. 1 5. 1 3 ; 4. 1 4. 1 4 ; 3.4 3.4 6.9 5 ; 6.9 It 5.7 6 i 5.7 , 7 i 5.7 5.7 8 ; 2.5 2.5 9 ; 2.5 2.5 10 i 2.5 2.5 2.3 It i 2.3 ' 12 i 4.8 i 4.8 13 12.3 i 12.3 14 3 2.5 2.5 5.7 115i 3.0 2.7 i 16 i 4.8 4.8 17 5.0 5.013.8 Is i 13.8 8.4 19 i i 4.8 20 1 • 21 i 4.8 i 4.8 22 i 23 i 5.0 5.0 24 i 1. 1 i 1. 1 25 i 2.9 i 2.9 26 i 13.0 i 13.0 27 i 3.0 8.7 i 11.7 28 i 14.2 5.0 i 19.2 29 i 15.7 i 15.7 30 S 8.8 7.2 i 16.0 31 i 12.6 i 12.6 32 i 14.7 i 14.7 33 { 43.8 i 43.8 34 i 6.3 i 6.3 i 9.5 9.5 35 36 i 6.3 i 6.3 37 i 14.6 i 14.6 38 i 0.0 39 f i 0.0 40 i i 0.0 1 _ i 0.0 r 42 i 0.0 43 i 8.0 i 9.0 44 . ;1 18.4 0.0 - i f 8.0 OTALi 43.3 f51. 1 ' 132.9 12.6 7.2 i 347. 1 'ES+h EVq S a�. ��' .a� sy.�„,ys:��� rR �*. - L' eke. t s, �xr �3� ., �'. .s .� .--a�` 'y"`d- 'fax-. j s"F`c p.-•.�-Y ti=-i,z�ev` ,...:.... ...... ..... ., .w.... .� .tia ....�L t , s Tigard Triangle - Land Use and Population/Employment Data Year 1986 1 -----Employment--Mopul- 1 SFDU Com TAZ 1 SFDU 1 Office 1 Retail lation Acres Acres --------------------------------------- ---------- --------- I 1 0 1 490 1 O ! 0 1 0.0 20.0 2 0 1 177 1 0 O 0.0 5. 1 3 0 104 1 0 0 0.0 4. 1 4 0 134 1 0 0 0.0 3.4 5 1 0 1 128 1 0 1 0 0.0 6.9 6 2 ! 106 1 0 4 1 0.6 2.5 7 1 5 O 1 0 9 1 1.4 0.0 8 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 9 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 4 1 0.6 0.0 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 it 0 13 1 0 0 0.0 1.0 12 7 1 0 0 13 2.0 0.0 13 1 i2 i 0 1 0 1 22 3.4 0.0 14 1 2 1 0 0 4 0.6 1 0.0 15 1 9 S 0 1 0 1 16 1 2.6 1 0.0 16 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0.3 0.0 17 1 10 0 0 1 18 2.9 0.0 18 1 3 1 103 60 1 5 ! 0.9 10.0 19 1 7 1 0 1 0 1 13 2.0 4.0 20 1 5 1 100 1 0 1 9 1 1.4 0.0 { 21 1 7 1 0 1 0 1 13 1 2.0 1 0.0 22 1 4 1 0 1 0 1 7 1 1. 1 1 0.0 23 1 6 1 0 1 0 1 11 1 1.7 1 0.0 24 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 0.6 1 0.0 25 1 it i 0 1 0 1 20 1 3. 1 1 0.0 26 1 16 1 0 1 0 1 29 1 4.6 1 0.0 27 1 13 1 0 1 0 1 24 1 3.7 1 0.0 28 1 0 1 167 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 14. 1 29 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 30 1 4 1 0 1 0 1 O 1 1. 1 1 16.0 31 1 0 1 54 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 32 1 32 1 0 1 0 1 58 1 9. 1 1 0.0 33 1 5 1 0 1 0 1 9 1 1.4 1 0.0 34 1 18 1 O 1 0 1 33 1 5. 1 1 0.0 35 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 4 1 0.6 1 0.0 36 1 1 1 O 1 0 1 2 1 0.3 1 0.0 37 1 14 1 0 1 0 1 25 1 4.0 1 0.0 38 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 39 1 O 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 40 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 .1 0.0 1 0.0 41 1 O 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 42 1 0 1 0 1 0 i 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 43 1 94 1 400 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 8.0 44 i 94 i 0 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 18.0 45 1 94 1 0 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 0.0 1<< ---------------------------------------1----------1 Total 1 482 1 1976 1 1380 1 1208 1 137.8 1 113. 1 Commercial Acres Developed -- 32.6% E Total Acres Developed (Com. and Res. ) 72.3% ..-.r.:.. .... ......'.:...:...ish>.sib:f.>uu.>:...:>1r:au.W31Hira.Ll. ...r>......_....... Year 1995 -----EmploymentAcres --;Fopul- 1 SFDU ; Com 1 Acres TAZ 1 SFDU 1 Office ; Retail 1ation ; ------- --------- '--- ----1-,----0-'- 490 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0.0 ; 20.0 2 0 ; 2100 ; 0 ; 0 0.0 1 5. 1 3 p 0 1 100 1 O O 1 0.0 / 4. 1 10.0 r1 ; O ; 150 ; 0 ' 0 1 3.4 0.0 ; 6.9 5 1 O ; 150 ; O ; 0 ! 6 ; 2 ! 100 1 0 ; 4 ; 0.6 ; 5.7 7 5 ; 185 ; 0 1 9 ; 1.4 1 2.5 8 O 1 200 ; 0 O ; 0.0 ; 2.5 ; ; g ; 2 1 100 1 0 ; 4 1 0.6 2.5 0 1 100 1 0 ; O 1 0.0 ; 2- 10 0 0.0 ; 2.3 ' 0 ; 100 1 0 11 1 2.0 ; 0.0 12 1 7 1 0 1 0 ; 13 1 0.4 13 1 12 ; 0 ; 0 1 22 ; 3.4 1 14 1 0 1 O 1 4 ; 0.6 1 0.0 ' 2 15 1 9 ; 0 1 0 ; 16 1 2.6 0.0 16 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 0.3 1 0.0 17 1 10 ; 0 1 O 1 18 1 2.9 ; 0.0 150 ; 100 1 5 ; 0.9 ; 6.0 18 1 3 ; ; 19 1 2.0 4.0 7 1 q 1 O 1 13 ; 5 1 200 1 0 ; 9 1 1.4 1 4.8 20 1 21 7 O 1 0 13 20 1 0.0 1 1 1 ; . O.O 22 ; 4 1 0 ; O 7 1 . 1 1 ; 23 1 6 1 0 1 O 1 11 ; 1.7 ; 0.0 24 1 2 1 O 1 0 1 2 ; 0.6 ; 0.0 25 1 11 1 0 1 O 1 20 p 3. 1 ; 0.0 26 ; 16 ; 0 1 0 1 29 ; 4.6 ; 0.0 27 1 13 ; 0 1 O 1 24 ; 3.7 ; 0.0 28 ; 0 1 300 1 0 1 0 ; 0.0 ; 19.2 O ; 0.0 ; 0.0 29 1 O 1 0 1 0 ; 0 1 1. 1 ; 0.0 30 i 4 1 0 1 31 i 0 ; 55 i 0 1 O ; 0.0 0.0 32 1 32 1 0 ; O 1 58 1 9. 1 0.0 1 33 1 5 ; 0 1 320 1 y 1.4 1 0.0 34 ; 18 ; O 1 O 1 33 1 5. 1 ; 0.0 35 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 4 1 0.6 0.0 36 1 1 0 ; 0 1 2 1 0.3 ; O.O 37 1 14 1 0 1 0 1 25 1 4.0 1 0.0 38 1 O 1 0 1 O 1 O 1 0.0 ; 0.0 39 1 0 1 0 1 O 1 0 ; 0.0 1 0.0 40 1 0 1 0 ; 0 : 0 ; 0.0 0.0 41 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 42 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ; 0.0 ; O.0 43 94 1 400 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 ; 8.0 44 1 94 1 0 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 18.0 45 1 94 1 O 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 0.0 ------ -'----------1-------- ----------------------- ------ / ` Total i 482 1 2980 1 1740 1 1208 1 137.8 ; 117.5 Commercial Acres Developed 33.9% 73.6Y. Total Acres Developed CCom. and Res. ) k . - .:.....w`.a:1Jw...iuuJM.i,uwi'ai:YlJwl��i.lili iai�l:�l:L+aY+1 •�z--, •Jvu.i.Wei+...... .... ......._� � Year 2005 '-----Employment--iPopul- 1 SFDU ! Cam TAZ i SFDU i Office 1 Retail lation ! Acres 1 Acres - --------------------------1----------1--------- ----i-; ---- -- 0 i 490 1 0 ! 0 i 0.0 20.0 2 i 0 ! 200 1 0 ! 0 i 0.0 5. 1 3 i 0 1 100 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 4. 1 4 1 0 i 150 1 O i 0 1 0.0 ! 3.4 5 Is O ! 150 i 0 ! 0 ! 0.0 6.9 6 i 2 1 300 1 0 i 4 1 0.6 1 5.7 7 1 5 1 385 1 0 i 9 i 1.4 1 2.5 8 1 0 1 300 1 0 i 0 1 0.0 1 2.5 9 ! 2 ! 200 1 0 1 4 1 0.6 ! 2.5 10 1 0 ! 100 1 0 i 0 ! 0.0 1 2.5 11 ! 0 1 100 1 0 ! 0 S 0.0 1 2.3 12 i 7 i 0 1 0 i 13 ! 2.0 1 0.0 13 1 12 1 O i 0 1 22 1 3.4 1 0.0 14 1 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 0.6 1 2.5 15 i 9 i 0 i 0 1 16 1 2.6 1 0.0 16 1 1 i 0 1 0 1 2 i 0.3 ! 0.0 17 1 10 i 140 1 0 1 18 1 2.9 i 5.0 18 1 3 1 270 1 200 i 5 1 0.9 1 13.8 19 1 7 1 0 1 0 1 13 1 2.0 1 4.0 20 ! 5 1 200 1 0 1 9 1 1.4 1 4.8 21 1 7 1 0 1 0 S 13 1 2.0 ! 0.0 22 ! 4 1 0 i 0 ! 7 i 1. 1 1 0.0 23 1 6 ! 0 1 0 1 11 1 1.7 1 0.0 24 1 2 1 O 1 0 i 2 1 0.6 1 0.0 25 i 11 1 0 ! t? 1 20 1 3. 1 ! 0.0 26 ! 16 ! 0 1 0 1 29 1 4.6 ! 0.0 27 1 13 ! 0 1 0 1 24 1 3.7 1 0.0 28 1 0 i 390 i 0 i 0 ! 0.0 1 19.2 29 ! 0 1 95 i 0 i 0 S 0.0 1 0.0 30 1 4 ! 0 i O i . 0 1 1. 1 1 0.0 31 ! 0 ! 55 1 0 ! 0 1 0.0 ! 0.0 32 ! 32 ! 0 i 0 1 58 ! 9. 1 1 0.0 33 1 5 ! 0 1 440 ! 9 ! 1.4 1 0.0 34 ! 18 ! 0 1 0 1 33 ! 5. 1 1 0.0 35 1 2 1 0 1 100 i 4 1 0.6 Is 0.0 36 1 1 ! 0 1 0 1 2 1 0.3 ! O.O 37 1 14 1 0 1 0 1 25 Is 4.0 1 0.0 38 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 O.O ! 0.0 39 1 0 1 O 1 0 ! 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 40 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 41 1 0 1 0 ! 0 ! 0 1 0.0 1 0.0 42 ! O i O ! 0 0 1 0.0 i 0.0 43 1 94 1 400 1 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 8.0 44 1 94 1 0 ! 440 1 284 1 26.9 1 18.0 45 1 94 1 0 ! 440 . 1 284 1 26.9 1 0.0 ------------------------- Ic Total 1 482 1 4025 ! 2060 1 1208 ! 137.8 i 232.8 CommercialAcres Developed---- 38.3% . Total Acres Developed (Com. and Res0-. 78.0% Y iv°-R'. r"3'ar R.. _ _ *!i JI�+F I�� ..tN fiLt ✓7;4 _ _ FULL DEVELOPMENT 1 SFDU !----No. of Acres-! Sch 1 Total TAZ !Acres 1 Office 1 ketail 1 Emp 1 Acres --------------------------------------- ---------- 1 1 ! 0.0 1 20.0 ! 0.0 1 0 ; 20.0 ! 2 ! 0.0 ! 5. 1 ; 0.0 i 0 ! 5. 1 1 3 ! 0.0 Is 4. 1 1 0.0 ! 0 ! 4. 1 ; 4 ! 0.0 1 3.4 ! 0.0 ! 0 ! 3.4 ! 5 ; 0.0 : 6.9 ! 0.0 ! 0 ; 6.9 6 ; 0.0 1 5.7 ! 0.0 1 0 ! 5.7 7 ; 0.0 ! 5.7 1 0.0 ! 0 ! 5.7 ! 8 1 0.0 S 2.5 ! 0.0 ! 0 : 2.5 9 1 0.0 : 2.5 ; 0.0 ! 0 ! 2.5 ! 10 : 0.0 1 2.5 ! 0.0 ! 0 ! 2.5 ! 11 1 0.0 1 2.3 ! 0.0 ! 0 1 2.3 12 : 0.0 1 4.8 1 0.0 : 0 : 4.8 ! 13 ! 0.0 1 12.3 : 0.0 : 0 ! 12.3 ! 14 1 0.0 1 2.5 ! 0.0 1 0 : 2.5 ! 15 1 3.0 : 0.0 : 2.7 1 0 : 5.7 1 16 0.0 ; 4.8 : 0.0 ; 0 ! 4.8 17 ; 0.0 1 5.0 Is 0.0 1 0 : 5.6 1 18 ! 0.0 1 0.0 It 13.8 ! 0 ; i3.8 19 : 0.0 1 8.4 i 0.0 ! 0 : 8.4 i 20 1 0.0 1 4.8 ! 0.0 : 0 1 4.8 21 : 0.0 1 4.8 ; 0.0 : 0 i 4. ! 22 1 0.0 1 1. 1 1 0.0 ! 0 1 1. 11 ! 23 1 0.0 1 5.0 : 0.0 : 0 i 5.0 24 1 0.0 1 1. 1 1 0.0 ; 0 : 1. 1 ! 25 : 0.0 1 2.9 : 0.0 ; 0 2.9 26 1 13.0 1 0.0 : 0.0 1 0 : 13.0 : 27 ! 0.0 1 3.0 1 8.7 ; 0 : 11.7 ! 28 0.0 1 14.2 : 5.0 1 0 ! 19.2 1 29 : 0.0 1 15.7 : 0.0 1 0 1 15.7 ! 30 1 4.0 1 0.0 8.8 ! O It 12.8 31 S O.0 1 0.0 : 0.0 ! 55 1 0.0 1, 32 1 14.7 1 0.0 : 0.0 i 0 1 14.7 : 33 : 0.0 1 0.0 : 43.8 1 0 : 43.8 ! 34 1 6.3 1 0.0 : 0.0 : 0 i 6.3 1 35 1 0.0 : 0.0 Is 9.5 : O 1 9.5 1 36 1 6.3 1 0.0 : 0.0 1 0 1 6.3 1 37 1 0.0 1 27.5 1 0.0 1 0 1 27.5 1 38 1 0.0 i 0.0 : 0.0 1 0 : 0.0 : 39 1 0.O 1 0.0 : 0.0 1 0 1 0.0 1 40 1 0.0 1 O.0 : 0.0 : O : 0.0 : 41 1 0.0 : 0.0 1 0.0 1 0 1 0.0 1 42 : 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0 : 0.0 1 43* 1 30.0 1 10.0 1 3$.0. : 0 f 75.0 44* 1 30.0 1 0.0 1 45.0 1 0 : 75.0 1 45* 1 30.0 1 0.0 1 45.0 1 O i 75.0 1 °----------1- ts Total 1137.3 1 -188.6 1 217.3 1 55 : 543.2 1 Thesethree zones include lands outside of the Trangle. -` " ',m WAiNES Rv. I too O OARTMoUTH gT. m FF%ANKLIN ST. N � � • �p W M r - r O J TI�iAPtiD 'TRIAMO ..S FM FIE �OU� TRAFFIC VOLUNW5 e " ' .-25io WAlNE5 ptD. O 3a� � o o ° � � � � pARTMoU�'H �T• `p O PF,AWKLIN ST- C4 ST"N d• G N N � w � dd,pt�►P?oN VT. 4 O GIP4Gta�.`.'�ION *Tucry t94:? AV Re OXILY 1014L -va&Fpic vowmSs iaDT� 24 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 68TH DESIGN DAY: YEAR 1995 ------------------GEOMETRY ----------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.47h. Thru Rt.kTh. Rt. Rt,Th,tLt Approach lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 WB 1 0 0 1 0 0 NB 1 0 0 1 0 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 211 74 41 326 W8 3 61 49 113 NB 124 183 18 325 SB 70 71 272 413 LANE BISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES 40PTIONAL WORKSHEET) ��-------------- -------------------._ + Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In opposing EPUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volmme PCElt Vlt PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (rph) Lane Lanes --------------------------------------------- 110 1.1 211 232.1 115 347.1 1 347 0 0 347 115 1.1 3 3.3 110 113.3 1 113 0 0 113 343 2 124 248 201 449 1 449 0 0 449 201 2 70 140 343 483 1 483 0 0 483 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 1 up 5 ----- -- -CALCIlIRTIONS OF STATUS---- --------- EO LT- 211 NB LT- 124 W6 TWT- 113 S8 THIRT- 343 rAw 324 SW 467 No LT- 3 SB LT- 70 - B`TwT- 115 )ID THkRT- 201 io• 118 SUM- 271 NABIMUM CAPACITY SUNFF (IF LEVEL i V{7ry{MES NAXIMM 'SIM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES- 791 A CAPACITY------_�_____�___-- 0 To I200 UNDER R1lht Turn Cback `OK 1201,TO 1400 NEAR 140 OVER 1965 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROSECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 72ND DESIGN DAY. YEAR 1995 ----------- ----GEOMETRY --------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes E$ 1 0 0 1 0 0 WB 1 0 0 1 0 0 NO 1 0 0 1 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 20 130 310 460 N$ 261 172 14 447 NB 199 7 207 413 SB 2 0 2 4 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) -_ _—_—----------------------------------- Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. in opposingEQUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. 04 The Volume PCEIt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproacAPer Lame in LT+TH Lane Remaining (vo) Lane Lanes -- ------------------------------------ - 166 1.1 20 22 440 462 1 462 0 0 462 440 2 261 522 186 749 1 706 0 0 706 2 1.1 199 218.9 214 432.9 1 433 0 0 433 214 2 2 4 2 6 1 6 0 0 6 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1400 & up S ---- ---------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS---------------------- 0 LT= 20 NH LT= 199 NB YMT= 708 SB TH&RT= 6 SMS 728 SUM- 205 Ri LT- 261 SB LT= 0 ED TMT* 440 ND TH&RT= 214 OUR= 701 SUM= 214 MAXIMUM CAPACITY {{' SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUNES NAXIMUM SUN OF CRITICAL VOLUMES= 942 B CAPACITY---- --- 0 TO 1200 UNDER Right Torn Check OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR 1400 DEER y 1985 HIGHYAY CAPACITY PROCEDURF PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: 716ARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HAMPTON AND 72ND DESIGN DAY: YEAR 1995 ------------------GEOMETRY ---------------—----------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 0 0 0 0 1 VB 1 0 1 0 1 0 NB 0 1 0 0 1 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 -----------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 0 0 0 0 NB 72 0 38 110 NB 0 379 14 393 SB 22 546 0 528 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LAMS ON A MULTILANE APPROACH NITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES !OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) «---------------------------------------------------------------- -- -------- --------+------------- Vo LT Total No. of E iv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing ERU1V Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT TH Ea. Of The Volume PCE1t Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (vph) Lane Lanes 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 72 79.2 0 79.2 1 79 0 0 79 506 2 0 0 379 379 1 379 0 0 379 379 2 22 44 506 550 1 550 0 0 550 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 —599 2 600 —799 3 600 -999 4 1000 & up 5 ------------------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS------------------ EB LT= 0 NB LT= 0 N8 THtRT- 79 68 THIRT= 506 SINN 79 SERI= 506 0 LT= 72 S8 LT- 22 r 0 TH&RT- 0 NB THWa 379 SUN■ 72 SUM= 401 MAXIMUM CAPACITY : SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL� VOLUlO:S 11AXINUM SISI OF CRITICAL VOLUMES- 585 A CAPACITY - -------------- 0 TO 1200 UNDER Right Turn Cbeck OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR ? 1400 OVER 1985 HIGHNAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 99 DESIGN DAY: YEAR 1995 ----- ------GEOMETRY ---------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.6Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 1 0 2 1 0 0 ND 1 0 2 1 0 0 NO 2 0 0 1 0 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 26 2359 233 2620 W8 68 2175 65 2308 NO 365 49 82 496 SD 147 111 99 357 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTlTHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) 4 -----------------------------�------------------------------ _ LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In 4 plying EQUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining fvph) Lane Lanes 2240 5 26 140 2592 2732 3 911 771 799 911 2392 5 68 340 2240 2560 3 660 520 588 860 210 2 365 730 131 861 1 861 0 0 861 131 1.1 147 161.7 210 371.7 l 372 O 0 372 PCE Lookup Table O -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 & up 3 -------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS---------------------- E8 LT= 28 N8 LT= 183 ND TH&RT= ON SB TH&RT= 210 go- 888 SUM= 393 YB LT= 68 9 LT= 147 a TWT= 864 N1) TipdtT= 131 SUM= 932 SUM= 278 NAXIMM CAPACITY SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES MAXlNN1 SUM Of CRITICAL VOLtS= 1325 f' CAPACITY-------------- 0 TO 1200 UNDER 's Right Turn Check OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR > 1400 OVER 1965 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: NNY 99 AND 69TH DESIGN DAY: YEAR 1995 ----------------GEOMETRY -------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,kLt Approach Lanes Lanes Lees Lanes Lanes Lanes E8 1 0 2 1 0 0 NB 1 0 2 1 0 0 NH 1 0 1 0 1 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total ED 55 1760 126 1941 so 273 2124 0 2347 NH 101 43 371 515 S) 0 99 112 211 LANE )ISTRIWTION FOR SHARE) LEFTITNRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES {OPTIONAL MORKSHEET) ym LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EOUIV Volume Lanes On Volute Vehicles LT TH Ea. Of The a Volute PCElt Vit pCE's (THAT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining Lane Ivph1 «-- ane Lanes ------------------------- -- 2124 3 55 275 1886 2161 3 720 445 500 720 3665 273 1365 2124 3489 3 1163 0 273 1062 211 2 101 202 43 245 1 245 0 0 243 43 1.1 0 0 211 211 1 211 0 0 211 PIS: Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 90rs -999 4 1000 & up 5 ------------------CALCULATION OF STATUS------- ---- Q LT- 5S N) LT= 101 ' WI1 TNIK- 1062 9 THW- 211 } SUM- 1117 SUN= 312 s 0 LT= 313 S9 LT= 0 Q TN&R1- 629 N) TH&RT- 43 SUN- 902 StRZ 43 MAXIMUM CAPACITY StMI OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES MAXIMUM SUM OF CRITICAL VL1IESz 1429 CAPACITY---- --« 0 TO 1200 UNDER RigAtt Two Mock OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR 1400 OVER 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HAINES AND 68169TH DESIGN DAY: YEAR 1995 ----------------GEOMETRY ---—--------------—------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.QTh. Rt. Rt,Th,6Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 0 0 0 0 1 WB 0 1 0 0 1 0 NB 0 1 0 1 0 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 -----------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES---------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Tura Total EB 43 3 23 69 We 47 1 113 161 NB 5 359 77 441 SB 151 332 15 498 LAIN: DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) ----------------------------_._—..—_------------------- Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing E@UIV Val use lanes On Voluae Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Voloae PCElt Vit PCE's 1TH+RT1 Total ApproachPer Lane in L1+TH Lane Resaining 1vph1 Lane Lines ---------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 43 47.3 26 73.3 1 13 0 d 73 26 1.1 47 51.7 1 52.7 1 53 0 0 33 347 2 5 10 436 446 2 223 213 218 223 436 2 151 302 347 649 1 649 0 0 649 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 i up 5 «--------CALCIN.ATIONS OF STATUS--- 0 LY- 0 NO Us 5 iNl THMS 53 S8 TH&RT= 347 Sol- 53 SUM- 352 8 LT= 47 a LT= 151 a TNhRT_ 73 8 TH&RT■ 223 SUM= 120 GUN* 374 MAXIMUM CAPACITY SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES MAXIMUM SUM OF CRITICAL VOL11!ES• 494 A CAPACITY- 0 TO 1200 UNDER Right Turn CIKk OK 1201 T8 1400 HEAR 1400 OVER UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION FORK FOUR-NAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION CITY: TIGARD INTERSECTION: HAINES AND 66TH 169TH METRO SIZE: 100,000 TO 500,000 LANE CONFIGURATION: 2-LANE BY 2-LANE COUNT: YEAR 1995 ALTERNATES LOCATION PLAN: ANALYST: DICK NDELK N s v E s ------------------------------- I APPR 1 NEST i EAST 1 SOUTH 1 NORTH I 1 HOVE 1 M1a. 1 -VT I-NR I EL I ET I ER I SL 1 ST 1 SR 1 ML i NT I NR I 1 VOL 1 43 1 3 1 23 1 47 1 1 1113 1 5 1 359 1 77 : 151 1 332 1 15 1 STEP 1 DEMAND LES A AND LES 8 = 230• VPH LES C AND LES D = 939. VPH TOTAL DENAND 1169. VPH STEP 2 SPLIT LES A AND LES 8 s 30 % LES C AND LES 8 = 70 Y STEP 3 INTERSECTIONS SERVICE 6 SATURATION LEVELS DELAY 6 LOS • C-D SATURATION LEVEL = 78. Y STEP 4 LOS C VMMIES FOR 11 LES = 67. VPN FOR E LES = 157. VPH FOR S LES - 430. VPH FOR N LES • 486. VPH FOR INTERSECTION = 1140. VPH Via;. �7j15 ti I- NOD WAINE5 AD, q� c91s � o DAKI MOUTH IbT• 1A ? PP,ANKLIN $T. ,ZysB,_,� � NOMPTOiJ g'f• fr J F s Tt OAI%D TRIAMO" GIPtCue.I�'[IoeS:'bTUQY T PrAPpie, .VOLUMS.5 u� �•�►\0O I 00 00 .9 pt4)0� 4--3G:oo flyo AA i-IAINE3 RO. O � ,? ury O N ( � O OARTMOUTH 'bT- � * VD8 A Oj 00 40 44Pap,Ar4KLW ST. C14 2ts�d---�•, i N O M PT Ol�l 'bT r �; r M 3 TIGAPW -MIA"" 0104LJLI► 4 -- 2005. AV5P%4GS DAV.TOTAL O 4 TFNA=FIG VOLUM65 CART) M h �{ o 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 68TH DESIGN DAY: YEAR 2005 -------_ -----GEDMETRY ---------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lutes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes E8 1 0 0 1 0 0 WB 0 0 0 0 0 1 NB 1 0 1 1 0 0 SB 1 0 1 0 1 0 ------TRAFFIC VOLUMES---------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 280 104 75 459 WB 6 86 76 168 NO 219 301 26 546 SB 97 94 322 513 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SNARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERNISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) _....---------------------------------------------- Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In _ Opposing ERU1V Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining two) Lane Lanes »162 ._i:;_ _--_-28- 399 "---179 487 1 487 0 0 481 179 1.1 6 6.6 162 168.6 1 169 0 0 169 94 1.1 219 240.9 327 567.9 2 284 43 262 264 327 2 97 194 94 288 1 288 0 0 288 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 ON -999 4 1000 i up 5 » ---------CALCU'ATIONS OF STATUS-------------- EB LT= 280 NO L1= 219 WB TMT= 169 SB TMT= 94 SUM= 449 SUM= 313 09 LT= O SB LT= 97 EB TN6RT= 179 8 TH&RT■ 164 SUN= 179 SUMS 261 MAXIMUM CAPACITY SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES _. MAXIMUM SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES= 762 A CAPACITY--------------------------- 0 TO 1200 UMBER Right Tare Cbeck OK 1201 TO 1400 NEM > 140 OVER F E 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: 716ARD TRIANGLE t INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 99 KSI6N DAY: YEAR 2005 --------- ----- --- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt Xh. Thru Rt Xh. Rt. Rt,Th,ELt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lines Lines Lanes EB 1 00 2 1 0 0 409 2 0 1 0 1 0 NB 1 0 1 0 1 0 SB __---,_-------TRAFFIC YOLUNES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total E8 36 2251 333 2620 Ng 57 2186 65 2306 Ni 608 45 146 799 Be 163 Be 125 378 LANE 1167RIINlTION FOR 51JK0 LEFTITHRU LANES ON A 1MILTILANE APPROACH PITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL VORKSHEET) _ __ A.' "ofEquiv. w Thru ---Val. In Val. In Vo LT Total E�JIV Volare Lanes On Volare Vehicles LT+TN Ea. 0# The O�irg roacbPer lane in LT+TH Lane Resa��l Volume palt Vlt PCE's (TH+RTi Total App Lane ----------- 1vpb) _ ----------- _---- 2431 _------ i80 2251 2431 3 810 630 666 81 2251 5 3 845 560 617 945 Z151 5 57 295 2251 2536 1 714 0 0 711 Be 1.1 608 668.8 45 713.8 1 210 0 0 274 45 1.1 165 181.5 BB 269.5 PCE Lookup Table 0 —199 1.1 240 -599 2 600 -799 3 900 -999 4 1000 it up 5 .--�-----CALCIILATIOIG OF STAT Kv LT -- ® LT* 36 SH Ta 88 W THma 845 6WI_ 392 1Oa 881 8 LTa 57 SB Lys 165 El TRW* 45 CAPACITY T1gJlja 750 � T�a 210 NAxIMBI 88R= 841 9A OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES `s NUIRUR OUR OF CRITICAL V(ILIA Bz 1273 D rn____- UNDER 0 TO 1200 1201 TO 1400NEAR Qi bt Tran Chea OK ) 1400 0 1985 HI6HNAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: 716M TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HNY 99 AND 69TH DESIGN DAY: YEAR 2005 GEOMETRY --------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of Na. of No. of Lt. Lt.BTh. Thru Rt Xh. Rt. Rt,Th,kLt Approach Lanes Lanes Lines Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 1 0 2 1 0 0 ND 1 0 2 1 0 0 N8 1 0 1 0 1 0 SD 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUNES- --------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 56 1698 187 1941 ND 426 1971 0 2397 ND 174 37 620 831 SB 0 DO 119 207 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTlTHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL INKSHEET) ` Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In �- opposing EBUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCEit Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (ypb) Lane Lanes ___.»------------ -----------------------------------____----_-__--z-�.__-----____-_-------- 1971 S 56 280 1883 2165 3 722 442 498 722 1885 5 426 2130 1971 4101 3 13670 426 986 207 2 174 348 37 385 1 363 0 0 385 37 1.1 0 0 207 207 1 207 0 0 207 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 1 up »----------------CALCULATIOMS OF STATUS-- 0 LT- 56 NB LT- 174 NB TwT- 986 88 THLRT- 207 SUM- 1042 SUM'_j 381 U LT- 426 8 LT- 0 E1 THMs 6" NB THW- 37 GUNS 1054 SUN- 37 MINUN CAPACITY SUM OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUN E8 NAtIMM SUN OF CRITICAL VOLUMES= 1435 E CAPACITY---- o TO 1200 UNDER Right Tern Check OK 1201,10 1400 NEAR 1900 OVER :µ ' E 1955 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS [ PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE E INTERSECTION: HAINES AND 697H/6BTH f DESIGN DAY: YEAR 2005 1 No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt Xh. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,LLt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 0 0 0 0 1 WB 0 1 0 0 1 0 NB 0 1 0 1 0 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 -----------------TRAFFIC VOLUNES----------------------------- Left Right Tura Thru Turn Total EB 66 5 20 91 NS 60 1 221 252 NB 5 537 111 656 SB 259 424 21 704 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A NULTILAKE APPROACH WITH PERNISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL YORKSHEET) ------------------------------------------------ Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EOUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT4TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (vphf Lane Lanes -------------------___.._-_----------------------------- ! 1.1 66 72.6 25 97.6 1 95 0 0 96 25 1.1 60 66 1 67 1 67 0 0 67 445 2 5 16 645 664 2 332 316 324 332 640 3 259 777 445 1222 1 1222 0 0 1222 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 !.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 000 -999 4 1000 6 up 5 -w _--..--CALC&t,T1O15 OF STATUS____---_------------- EB LT= 6 NB LTx 0 00 THWU 67 SB TH RT= 445 Sw 73 SW 453 18 LT= 60 SO LT• 259 ED TWAT• 90 Ni TRW* 332 OOMS 150 Mo 591 MAXIMUM CAPACITY SUM OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLNES MAXIMUM SON OF CRITICAL IR>LONES■ 749 A CAPACITY --------- 0 TO 1200 UNDER Right Tiara ChKk OK 120110140 NEAR ? 1400 OVER . 1985 HISHNAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT. TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HAMPTON AND 68TH DESIGN DAY: YEAR 2005 ------ -------SEOMETRY --------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Tb. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes lanes Lanes EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 MD 1 0 0 1 0 0 NB 1 0 0 1 0 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 -----------TRAFFIC VOLUNES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 57 3 3 63 MB 32 )8 2 52 NH 38 113 9 160 SB 9 46 38 93 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARES LEFTJTNRU LANES ON A KULTILANE APPROACH »�» MITH PERNISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES-IOPTIONAL-MORKSHEET)-_»-»-_»»»»»________»_»___» Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EQUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The t Volume PCEIt Vit PCE's 1TH+RT) Total ApproacbPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (vph) Lane Lanes 20 1.1 57 62.7 6 68.7 1 69 0 0 69 6 1.1 32 35.2 20 55.2 1 55 O 0 55 84 1.1 38 41.6 122 163.8 1 164 0 0 164 122 1.1 9 9.9 84 93.9 1 94 O 0 94 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 & up 5 ------- CALCULATIONS OF STATUS----------------~---- EB LT= 57 NS LT= 38 MS TH&RT= 55 9 TWT= 84 SUN= 112 SUN= 122 MS LT= 32 88 LT= 9 0 TH&RT= 6 NS THkRT= 122 SW 38 SUN= 131 NAXINUI CAPACITY SUN QF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLU0 NAXINUN SISI OF CRITICAL VOLUMES= 243 A CAPACITY- -0 TO 1200 um Right Tarn Check OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR > 1400 OVER 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 72ND DESIGN DAY: YEAR 2005 ------------------GEOMETRY -------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of 1 F Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt 4proach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 1 0 1 0 N8 1 0 0 1 0 0 ND 1 0 0 1 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 1 —__.---_---TRAFFIC VOLUMES---------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 18 197 321 536 ND 302 302 21 625 N6 242 7 254 503 SD 11 8 0 19 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) Vo �.___.__- LT---_--Total ' No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In 11"osial EQUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+cT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining (vphl Lane Lanes -- - --_��---------------------------------- 323 2 18 36 197 233 1 233 0 0 233 _ 197 1.1 302 332.2 323 655.2 1 655 0 0 655 8 1.1 242 266.2 261 527.2 1 527 0 0 527 261 2 11 22 B 30 1 30 0 0 30 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 900 -999 4 1000 & up 5 ---- --CALCULATIONS OF STATUS----___._ ED LT= 18 ND LT= 242 V9 THIRT• 655 SB THUT■ 30 SUN■ 673 SUN= 272 MD Us 302 SB LT= O 0 THMs 197 NB TWAT= 261 SUNz 499 SUN= 261 U11111M CAPACITY (� SIM! OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUTES n- NAXIIMM SUN OF CRITICAL VOLUMES= 945 D CAPACITY --- 0 TO 1200 UNDER A1j:t Torn Check OK 1201 TO 1400 NEWT > 1400 AVER a C 1485 HISHUY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TISARD TRIANS'LE INTERSECTION: HAMPTON AND 72ND DESIGN DAY: YEAR 2005 ------_ --------GEOMETRY ----------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 0 0 0 0 0 1 N8 1 0 1 0 1 0 N9 0 1 0 0 1 0 S9 1 0 0 1 0 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES-____.__.._-_-_--------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total E1 0 0 0 0 NH 79 0 42 121 Na 0 462 16 478 S9 19 564 0 583 LANE DISTRIDUTION FON MARE! LEFTlTHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH KITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL VDRKSHEET) VD LT Total No. of Equiv. Tkru Vol. In Vol. In Opposisg E1UIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Voluae PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LUTH Lane Resaining fvpb) Lane Lanes 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 79 86.4 0 96.9 1 97 0 0 87 564 2 0 0 462 462 1 462 0 0 462 462 2 19 38 564 602 1 602 0 O 602 PCE Lookup Table 0 -1" 1.1 200 -344 2 600 -749 3 800 -994 4 1000 & up 5 -----------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS-----..------_._ E1 LT- 0 N9 Um 0 1N) TIwRT- 87 89 THMT- 564 SMS ff7 W& 364 0 Lt- 79 91 LT- 14 E9 MT- 0 0 TM AT- 462 9191- 79 SOLI- 481 MAXIMUM CAPACITY SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES MAMMON SO OF CRITICAL V"OLINNE9- 651 A CAPACITY 070 1200 UNDER Right two Chick OK 1201 TI 1400 NEAR 1 1400 OVER 3513 �y �pN In ti WAIPF-5 RD. N 04 o > DARTMOUTH 'ST. \ 44w- lit, ��,� 4� 136 ►-�► lit, � o• PSARKLIN ST. LO N W H MAMeTOM a TI as I%P TFLI4NQ" C4 r GiP4Cu�-AT10N .BTUdY ; .�- dr � .� bUILO-OUT PM PE.M:NoUR TRAPPIG VoL.UMES � �AOTRO' E.MME 2 PPtiOJEG1I006 uj a z . I O 2a� co a 1 � ao t o o y�•a �'' 4506 6200--b- u A N E5 AD, N > DARTMOUTH 'ZT- ? _ PINAWKLIN ST. 00 silo --a► a NOMPTON S?• r J i CIF44j"Ifam 4TUO^' N Y 1T t?SA�iils XcffKL-- 1 WM- MIA rotiietRO. ammo i"PSDJroc. tOMS 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS `L PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 68TH DESI6H DAY: TOTAL OLD PM PK ------------------GEOMETRY -------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt Xh. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. fit,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 2 0 2 0 1 0 uB 1 0 2 0 1 0 NO 1 0 1 1 0 0 SO 1 0 1 1 1 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total ED 843 314 226 1385 up 41 585 517 1143 NO 343 472 41 8u S8 233 226 773 1232 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) ---_._--_---------------._—------------------------------ Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In e opposing EOUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Value* PCElt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Reoaipinq s IYph) Lane Lanes ..----«--»-------------..------------••-- - so 2 845 1690 314 2004 2 1002 0 843 314 314 2 41 82 5B5 667 2 334 252 293 334 226 2 343 6" 513 1199 2 600 0 343 513 313 2 233 466 226 692 2 346 0 233 226 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 Boo -999 4 1000 1 up 5 ------------------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS--------------_------ EB LT= 423 NB LT= 343 99 TH&RT= 334 68 TH&RT= 113 SUM= 756 SUM= 456 NB LT= 41 68 LT= 233 EA TMT* 1557 0 THINS 257 Sw= 198 SUI- 490 MAXIINBI CAPACITY SUM OF CRITICAL LEVEL VDLUMES MAXINUN SUM OF.CRITICAL VOLINIFS= 1246 D CAPACITY 0 TO 1200 UNDER Rigbt Tern Check QK 1201 TB 1400 NEAR > 1400 OVER ♦ 1485 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HWY 99 AND 69TH DESIGN DAY: TOTAL RD PN PK ---------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.tiTh. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,T+:,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 1 0 3 1 0 0 NB 1 0 3 1 0 0 ND 1 0 1 0 1 0 SD 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total ED 63 1910 210 2183 ND 419 1939 0 2358 ND 214 46 763 1023 SD 0 133 180 313 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A !MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL NORKSHEET) --------------------------- - t Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Val. In Vol. In - Opposing EQUIV Value Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TN Ea. Of The Volume PCEIt Vit PCE's LTH+RT1 Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Reeaioing (yph) Lane Lanes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1939 5 63 315 2120 2435 4 609 294 357 b09 2120 5 419 2095 1939 4034 4 1009 0 419 646 313 2 214 428 46 474 t 474 0 0 474 46 1.1 0 0 313 313 1 313 0 0 313 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -794 3 800 -999 4 1000 i up 5 ------------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS------ ------ EA LT• 63 NB LT= 214 a TmT■ 646 93 THLI:T• 313 SUM= 709 SUN- 527 18 LT* 419 SB LT- 0 ES TWT■ 530 NS THUtT= 46 Stat= 949 SIAL= 46 NAXIMIN CAPACITY SIA! OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLIKS y NAXIMM 5111 OF CRITICAL. VOLIN ES= 1476 E CAPACITY 0 TO 1200 LQw Right Turn Cheat OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR > 1400 OVER f ------------ ('' 1965 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS *•. PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 99 DESIGN DAY: TOTAL BLD PM PK ------GEOMETRY ----------------------------------- No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.6Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 2 1 1 0 NB 1 0 2 1 0 0 NB 2 0 1 0 1 0 58 2 0 1 1 1 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUMES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 45 2821 417 3263 we 62 2373 71 2506 NB 945 70 227 1242 SB 742 396 562 1700 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) ---------------------------------------------------- r` Vo LT Total No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EQUIV Volume Lanes On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vlt PCE's 1TH*RT1 Total ApproachPer Lane in LT*TH Lane Remaining Ivpb1 Lane Lanes ------------------------------------------------- 2444 5 45 225 2821 3046 3 1015 790 835 1015 2621 5 62 310 2444 2754 3 918 608 670 916 396 2 945 1890 70 1960 1 1960 0 0 1960 70 1.1 742 816.2 396 1212.2 2 606 0 742 396 RCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 1 up 5 ----- ------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS ---------------- EB LT- 45 NB LT- 473 0 THIAT= 918 SB TH#RT= 196 81N1= %3 SUN- 671 WB LT= 62 68 LT- 371 E1 TNART- 940 N1 TOWn 70 MAIN 1002 SUN- 441 MINIM CAPACITY SUN OF CRITICAL LEVEL VOLUMES WINUN SUN OF CRITICAL VOLUNES- 1673 E CAPACITY— ac i 0 TO 1200 UNDER T Ri,bi !wn Check OK 1201 TO 1400 NEAR > 1400 OVER r 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TI6ARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HAINES AND 69TH168TH DESIGN DAY: TOTAL BLD PN PK -----------------GEOMETRY ----------------------------------- No, of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 WB 1 0 1 0 1 0 NB 0 1 1 0 1 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 -----------------TRAFFIC VOLL41ES----------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total ED 329 25 100 454 MB 111 2 410 523 NB 16 1088 225 1329 S1 233 361 19 633 LAVE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFTITHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) —---------_------------------------ Vo LT Total No. of Equir. Thru Vol. In Vol. In �.- opposing EQUIV Volume Lines On Volume Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume PCElt Vit PCE's 1TH+RT1 Total ApproachPer Lane in LT+TH Lane Remaining < lvphl Lane Lanes 2 1.1 329 361.9 125 486.9 1 487 0 0 467 x 125 1.1 111 122.1 2 124.1 1 124 0 0 124 400 2 16 32 IOBB 1120 2 560 528 544 560 1088 5 233 1165 400 1565 1 1565 0 0 1565 PCE Lookup Table 0 -1% 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 & up 5 _—_-w__--MCtLATIM OR STATUS------ 0 LT= 329 NB LT= 16 VB TI&RT- 124 SB THIRTY 400 SUNS 453 SUM= 416 k, 18 LTY 111 SB LT• 233 a TORTY 125 N1 TIMTY 560 SUM- 236 "a 193 NAXIINlN CAPACITY St1N OF CRITICAL LEVEL VMXNEB MAXIM SUI! OF CRITICAL VORUIES0 1246 1 CAPACITY- - 0 TO 1200 UNDER Right Turn Check K 1201 TO 1400 NEAR ) 1400 OVER { r 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HAMPTON AND 72ND DESIGN DAY: TOTAL BLD TRAFFIC PM -------------GEOMETRY ------------------------------------ No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.6Th. Thru Rt.QTh. Rt. Rt,Th,4Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 NB 2 0 1 0 1 0 NB 1 0 1 1 0 0 SB 1 0 1 1 0 0 ------«---------TRAFFIC VOLUMES- --------------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total ES 0 1 0 1 NB 947 0 503 1450 NB 0 1066 37 1103 SB 16 497 0 503 LANE 1ISTRIHUTION FOR SHARED LEFTfTHRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL WORKSHEET) — Vo LI -«- Total - No. of Equiv. Thru Vol. In Vol. In Opposing EQUIV Voluee Lanes On Voloee Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Volume FCEIt Vit PCE's (TH+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Resaining lvph) Lane Lanes ----------------«---------- _ 0 1.1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1.1 947 1041.7 0 1041.7 1 1042 0 0 1042 487 2 0 0 1103 1105 2 552 552 552 551 1103 3 16 80 467 567 2 264 204 220 284 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -199 3 800 -999 4 1000 1 up 5 —« ---------CALCULATIONS OF STATUS----------- ----~ E1 LT- 0 N8 LT= 0 N8 TMT- 0 98 THIRT= 244 gil- 0 SIAL= 244 98 LT= 474 Be LT= 16 :tE1 TIIERT= 1 N1 MRTs 532 SUIT- 475 SUM= 568 M JINUM BIM! OF CRITICAL VOLIN ES= 1042 LOS = B R181tt 3a CMsck OK " * M _ r 4 ♦ 1965 HISMY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: HAHPTON AND 68TH DESIGN DAY: TOTAL BLD TRAFFIC PN No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. U.M. Thru Rt.&Th. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes ED 2 0 0 1 0 0 V1 1 0 0 1 0 0 NB 1 0 1 1 0 0 S8 i 0 2 0 1 0 _-----_�-------1RAFFiC VOLUMES---...�.---------------------- Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 905 48 48 1001 a 12 104 185 301 NB 203 603 4B 856 S8 140 717 592 1449 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR MAKI LEFTITHRU LANES ON A NIR.TILANE APPROACH VITH PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL VORKBNEET) — Va _-~----~—_..—__------LT --MTotai ---�-- No. of Equiv. Thru Val. In Vol. In Opposing EDUIV Volww Lanes On Voluee Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The Vol,Um PCEIt Vit PCE's ITN+RTN Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane Reeaining lvphl LaneLanes —-------- 289 2 905 1810 9b 1906 1 1906 0 0 1906 96 1.1 12 13.2 289 302.2 1 302 0 0 302 717 3 203 609 653 1262 2 631 22 225 631 653 3 140 420 717 1137 2 569 149 289 569 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -599 2 600 -799 3 800 -999 4 1000 & up 5 -- TIONS OF STATUS----------_ 0 LT- 453 NB LT- 203 V9 TH&RT- 289 S8 THLRT■ 359 SIA(- 742 SUM- 562 ND LT- 12 88 LT-. 140 ® THUT- 96 ND THNIRT- 327 M 108 91110 467 NAXIMUN SUN OF CRITICAL VWJ02 1303 LOS - D Rilbt Tura Check OK R R f . A � f 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY PROCEDURE PLANNING ANALYSIS PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE INTERSECTION: DARTMOUTH AND 72ND DESIGN DAY: TOTAL BLD TRAFFIC PN --------------b'EONETRY -------------»------------------ No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of Lt. Lt.&Th. Thru Rt.&Tb. Rt. Rt,Th,&Lt Approach Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes Lanes EB 1 0 1 1 1 0 ND 2 0 1 1 0 0 NB 1 0 1 0 1 0 SB 1 0 0 1 0 0 ------------------TRAFFIC VOLUNES------------------------------ Left Right Turn Thru Turn Total EB 34 373 607 1014 NB 1004 1004 70 2078 NB 258 7 271 536 SB 204 149 0 353 LANE DISTRIBUTION FOR SHARED LEFT/THRU LANES ON A MULTILANE APPROACH WITH PERNISSIVE LEFT TURN LANES (OPTIONAL MORKSHEET) ----------------- ._._-_.�- -_�- -----------------_�» Va LT Total No. of Equiv. Toru Vol. In Vol. In opposing EBUIV Volm Lanes On Volum Vehicles LT+TH Ea. Of The .. Volume PCElt Vit PCE's (TN+RT) Total Approach Per Lane in LT+TH Lane RMining (vph) Lane Lanes �1014rw -rS~--N34 N170 373 -~543 -~-2 - 272 102 136 272 373 2 1004 2008 1074 3062 2 1541 0 1004 1074 149 1.1 258 283.6 7 290.8 1 291 0 0 291 7 1.1 204 224.4 149 373.4 1 373 0 0 373 PCE Lookup Table 0 -199 1.1 200 -399 2 600 -799 3 800 -"9 4 1000 t up S ------------------CALCULATIONS OF STATU5 ----------------- EB LTA 34 N8 LT■ 258 0 TH&RT■ 537 SB THwm 149 son 571 S & 407 NO LT= 502 9 LT• 204 EB TH&RT= 181 NB TMRT= 7 > SUN= 689 SUH- 211 MAXINUH SUN OF CRITICAL VOL9KS= 1096 LOS ■ C Right Turn Check 01( .Fes. .'-W V MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor & Council October 29, 1986 FROM: Doris Hartig — Deputy Community Service Director SUBJECT: September Monthly Report 'ty Accounting and Support Services have spent time catching up the backlog. The process for monthly utility billing is improving. Progress is being made with the new computer system and staff should be able to use for accounts payable in early November. Word Processing expects to implement the new hardware/software upgrade when the court function is cleared. The auditors have completed field work and Council will receive audit report in November. Personnel staff has spent considerable time on recruiting, assessment centers and new hires. To date the positions of Community Service Director and Finance Directors are still open. ia42 z > WORK LOAD INDICATORS Sept. '85 Sept. '86 Expenditure Reimbursement Requests Processed * x 157 Purchase Orders Processed 40 127 Recruitments 2 4 Hires 6 16 Terminations 0 3 Unemployment Claims 2 0 Claims Filed: Workers Compensation - Stress - Public Works Bite on Leg - Police (2) 1 3 Liability (see attached report) Checks Written: Accounts Payable 19? 355 Payroll 236 288 Sewer Payment Received 1,451 4,483 Sewer Bills Sent 1,437 5.215 Dame, Address, Changes 253 ="5 Cash Receipts 687 796 Word Processing Work Orders Received 134 237 Emergency Requests 28 81 Pages Processed 16,123 10,815 Average Turn Around 5.4 4.4 Telephone Calls 6,190 11,387 Walk-ins 2,166 N/A Volunteer Hours 0 0 * Information not available ia42 10/24/86 " CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT a DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 2/13/85 Mervin Boon False arrest pending 8/21/84 George KuSiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity (Officers Johnson, Ober, & Newman) Y 2/4/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 3/20/83 Fred Ozan False arrest Appeal Filed F (Officer Killion) 1/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False AeeQst pending (Office Merrill) 7/20/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened 3/16/85 Julie B. Winkel-sin Wrongful Death pending 12/15/85 Ron & Peggy Cole Loss of jewelry - stolen Reopened { after insured had possession 4/5/86 John Hutchinson Trees cut on private Pending property 7/25/86 R.A. Cutshall Bike hit cable in park path New claim 1/31/86 David Fain Police negligence Open 4/6/86 Scott Fairbanks Code Enforcement negligence Open 9/19/86 Renata Collins Water damage-drain overflow Open ( problem (0886F/0019F) :E r - i � � � I I / 1 1 I .` �� ; 1 �i 1 1 ,� � 1 a � � I sp p1 1 t 1 • I � I I 1 1 �* 1 1 1 /[ 1 � 1 3� 1 1 ii I 1 1 1 1 K I I ` A �� � 1 1 1 } I I 1 i 1 = 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •` 1 1 1 ` 1 1 1 � 1 " 1 1 � 1 SNI 1 I t � 1 1 1 +� � 1 x � i M 1 Z { � 1 I V M M � • � � M ` -� � #� � � - � .. �. � »� � � � � h h � . '� � � +� � �' o d 6� iM 11rf�� •fix ���"z, x�^s.+rr - ,.,.,�.� s: _ - ,-..r. _ r..it,e y-�,.n, _ ��. . . . . . . . . . . ! � | � ! � � � | � 2 > �� ! © � . § £\ ■ . . . .I � � : � . « ®\. . Lr - > J � \ «\ - M t r �1 r i � O W«w A � O 1 r LIS 1 Jill W r i 1 L 1 1 1 �G r ,4 L * tJ v MEMORANDUM [.� CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council November 7, 1986 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Administrative Order Adopting J Classification Descriptions Pursuant to Res. N 86--411 the following have been reviewed by the City's collective bargaining units, the Personnel Department and administratively adopted by the City Administrator. These are for your infomation and are to be received and filed. RWJ/dc:99 LL� , f� C L A S S I F I C A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N S POLICE DEPARTMENT Secretary/Clerk I Dispatcher/Clerk School Resource Officer Police Officer Corporal Sergeant sb103/sb4 �r i� T +F SECRETARY/CLERK I f �- GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs clerical lle ustepsofin some Procedures and increasing complexity often involving P tment policies, laws, and requiring judgement in applications of depar regulations controlling work assignment; uses own initiative to accomplish tasks within prescribed work assignment; may occasionally assist dispatch back—up; may provide clerical support to a number of professional or administrative employees within a department. irection an SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under receivethe supervision and daily supervi ion and dassignments ffrom administrative employee and may a clerical employee of a higher classification. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision of employees is not normally a responsibility of Posit in this classification. : (Any single position of a class will not EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES listed and many positions will involve usually involve all of the duties duties which are not listed.) al 1. Performs a range re ndence, maintenancevanced and and r analysisieof lrecords, composition of correspondence, Preparation of statistics and reports. dures in 2. Generally interprets laws, regulations, on to Policies, other units,e organizatio s,, to obtain from or provide inf or the public. 3. Operates typewriter, word processor, or computer to prepare forms, reports, minutes of meetings, correspondence, and requisitions from copy, rough draft, dictating machinelf , oral instructions r seficeomprocedure applying full range of vocabulary, grammar, knowledge, and basic knowledge of radio and teletype. 4. Receives, reviews, adjusts, and records documents and reports requiring use of technical subject—matter knowledge. 5, Schedules meetings, notifying participants. posting notices, and preparing materials. 5. Generally advises general public on interpretation of laws, city ordinances, and department regulations and procedures. 7. Assists in maintaining various fiscal and personnel records; posts and balances receipts, and prepares cashier deposits. 8. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFYCATIONS: recok epng ice Knowledge Of: Standard office practices and procedures; andf arithmetic; basicj and reporting, Business English, spelling, p bookkeeping principles. SECRETARY/CLERK I Page Two Ability To: Communicate effectively and appropriately orally and in writing; interpret and apply program information in making work decisions or supplying information to others; organize own workload efficiently and make appropriate decisions concerning work methods, maintain specialized records and prepare narrative or statistical reports from information gathered, make accurate arithmetic computations or apply standardized statistical or mathematical procedures, manually or by machine; operate full scope of office equipment and machines; transcribe meeting notes and minutes; establish and maintain effective working relationship with subordinates, peers, and supervisors; understand and execute written and oral instructions; meet and respond to public and private officials in a courteous, efficient manner; organize workload in a logical, efficient manner; work independently; work effectively in stressful situations meeting required deadlines. Skill In: Operation of standard office machines; written and oral communication. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: High School graduation or equivalency and three years progressively more responsible clerical support experience, or any satisfactory combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. sb103/sb4 kw.< S M y a�7 DISPATCHER/CLERK II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Receives and dispatches police emergency communications and non—emergency instructions and messages in the central office; performs a variety of clerical duties; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Support Services Manager; daily supervision of work projects may be provided by a shift commander. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision of employees is not normally a responsibility of positions in this classification. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) I. Answers the telephone on all emergency and non—emeogency calls; records messages and complaints. x. Operates police radio; dispatches patrol cars to calls for assistance, accidents or possible illegal action, providing complete, accurate information to officers. 3. Maintains radio contact as necessary and records officer's location at all times; maintains related records necessary for efficient operation of the department. t 4. Maintains traffic and criminal files. 5. Performs day—today recordkeeping, communication, and clerical support functions for all divisions of department. 6. Meets the public and gives assistance when needed. 7. Transcribes investigative interviews and types reports. 8. Assists officers with female prisoners in searches or accompanyi to jail/hospital. 9. Operates teletype, computer, and related data entry and retrieval equipment to obtain pertinent information to assist officers in field and for follow up reports. 10. Assists in training of newly hired Dispatcher/Clerk, Secretary/Clark, and others. It. Performs related duties as required. a DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Grammar, spelling, Business English, and modern office procedures; recordkeeping and reporting; state, federal, and local laws. DISPATCHER/CLERK II Page Two Ability To: Operate radio, teletype, and computer equipment; establish and maintain effective working relationship with co-workers and supervisors; communicate effectively orally and in writing; work flexible hours and shifts as assigned; use tact, discretion, and courtesy in inter-departmental and public contacts; learn city codes, ordinances, regulations, and procedures; communicate effectively and appropriately orally and in writing; organize work efficiently and make appropriate decisions concerning work methods and priorities; operate the full scope of office equipment and machines; type at least 40 words per minute; establish and maintain effective working relationships with peers and supervisors; maintain specialized and confidential records and prepare narrative or statistical reports from information gathered; make accurate arithmetic computations or apply standardized statistical or mathematical procedures manually or by machine; understand and execute written and oral instructions; organize workload in a logical, efficient wanner; use good, independent judgement in making decisions; work effectively in stressful situations meeting required timelines; comprehend and interpret pertinent laws, rules, and regulations. Skill In: Operation of office and communication equipment necessary to perform duties. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Graduation from high school or equivalency with previous office experience including typing; or any satisfactory combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. _A sb103/sb4 -4'.-: �R r SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER f t GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A professional, sworn police officer assigned to the School District who works in the High School and/or Junior High Schools within the Tigard School District to provide education, support, and counseling to students with special problems, and serves as a law enforcement resource person to school faculty, staff, and concerned parents and citizens. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of school principal or assigned administrative staff member while on school premises. Reports to Assistant Chief of Police or designated superior officer and performs all regular work described for police officer when operating out of Tigard Police Department. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this classification. May act as "Officer in Charge" of special incident on school premises (such as theft, drug overdose, suicide, or other type of student crisis or problem). EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL. DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not specifically listed. The following are illustrative examples only.) 1. Serves as resource person, providing support and counseling for students with special problems, such as alcohol/drug abuse/addiction, family violence, child abuse/neglect situations, and the like. Works with students to correct problems and change behaviors befure criminal activity has a chance to occur. 2. Provides education in classrooms or seminars on such matters as safety, drug/alcohol abuse/addiction, suicide prevention, rape awareness, and related matters, as needs of School District dictate. 3. Serves as liaison officer between the Police Department and the School District, helping to prevent crimes in the school system, conducting Investigations into alleged criminal acts, maintaining peace and order and assisting students with special problems. (Normally does not conduci investigations, but serves as liaison between the Police Department and school officials.) 4. As directed, teaches classes and/or makes presentations to students, faculty and staff, community and civic groups, etc. , regarding safety, drug/alcohol abuse prevention, functions of SRO program; and otherwise promotes both the School District's and Tigard Police Department's image in the community. S. Participates as member of the faculty in school activities and training and staff development programs. Also participates in athletic and social events, etc. , both in official capacity and as interested citizen to promote well—rounded image of law enforcement officer to students, faculty, and citizens, and to develop relationships with students who don't normally come to this individual with problems. Functions as member of faculty "team", especially with dealing with student problems and/or participating in training or staff development programs. SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER Page Two figure on school and serves as authority sitive image of 6. Maintains th ito deterb cr. i1nal acts and to promote a Po campus, students and faculty. law enforcement among en ve fforts 7. Functions as coordinator or resource person beage ciesi and theSchool of the Tigard Police and/or other law enforcement District in criminal or drug investigations. Makes arrests as appropriate when viewi criminal acts on school Rremise�s•a� assumes such lice office 8 Performs all duties described for regularerfor•m�° related duties as expanding additional responsibilities and Performs dictates• needs of the School Resource Officer prog ESIRABLE ALIFICAT'IONS: training, and f e Baccalaureate degree P referred or combination ae ino law denfo cement, psychology, experience equivalent to a bachelor's deet sociology. education, or related field. and individual lice work, family skills; tions, juvenile Po written communications and Skill in investigations. verbal and relations, public relations. counseling. Effective assertive; positive human effectively with diverse citizen self-confident, Skill in dealing faculty and interpersonal skills. news media, school officials. Ability to publics, businessleivic leaders, news and senior high school level. est possible sand students at the j faculty. Promoting jCi staff. with school officials and i served. work effectively nity being image of law enforcement within the comma Attend School Resource Oregon BPST standards for police officer. Must meettwithin months of hire date and attend he school in-service officer training nt programs provided by training aux! staff development city and off-duty in athletic and social Participates both i School Disfficial trict. events sponsored Y the Requires Dragon driver's license; residence within Clackamas. Multnomah, or Washington Counties. sbiO3/sba POLICE OFFICER GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A professional, sworn position that performs law enforcement and crime prevention work including patrol and investigation; enforces federal, state, and local laws; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of a supervisor or signs and reviews work; receives daily other superior officer who as assignments from a supervisor or other superior officer. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this classification. May, as officer in charge or senior shift officer, be responsible for leadworker duties. ll not EXAMPLES nv PRINCIPAL DUTIES: dutiesn listed single and position positions 1 willwiinvolve usually involve al duties which are not listed.) and ase 1 records and reports, and traffic participates �insthe prosecution of prepares c esinthe court. 2. Prepares daily activity reports; prepares accurate and complete, concise reports on traffic accidents and criminal investigations; maintains various records and files. 3. Serves criminal warrants, applicable court orders and subpoenas. 4. Assists disabled motorists, provides information and direction to the public. 5. Receives and investigates criminal activities; furnishes information to assist with investigations and investigates traffic accidents. 6. Patrols assigned areas to enforce traffic laws and to prevent and detect crime; manages time consistent with divisional and departmental goals and , objectives. 7, May be assigned to specialized unit of department. B. Observes and reports hazards and potential crime and traffic problems. g. Occasionally requires leadworker duties including assigning of work and assisting work force. 10. Trains and instructs recruit officers; completes recruit evaluations on an established schedule, when assigned. il. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Federal, state, local, civil, and criminal laws; functions, ` responsibilities, and procedures of a law enforcement office; practices and procedures for investigations; correct use and care of firearms; English grammar, spelling, usage and punctuation. POLICE OFFICER Page Two Ability To: Apply effective and reasonable courses of action in apprehending violators; use firearms safely and correctly; operate a motor vehicle in a safe manner; prepare accurate, concise, and informative reports; deal courteously and firmly with the public in situations requiring good judgement and tact; establish and maintain a harmonious and effective working relationship between divisions and with fellow employees and supervisors; work flexible hours and shifts as assigned; prioritize work and work independently using good judgement in decision making. Skill In: Use and care of firearms; safe and efficient operation of a motor vehicle. police radios, cameras, radar equipment, intoxilyzer and related police equipment. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Graduation from high school or equivalent with some experience or course work in law enforcement; or any satisfactory combination of training and experience as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIRElNTS: Possession of SPST basic certificate at time of hire or within 12 months of employment; possession of a valid Oregon driver's license and good driving record. sblO3tsb4 i" R �3 CORPORAL GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A professional, sworn position that, in the absence of a watch commander, acts as first—line supervisor on an assigned shift coordinating the work of subordinate law enforcement personnel; trains new employees in all phases of law enforcement; task team leader; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of a watch commander or other superior officer for activities assigned. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: In the absence of a watch commander directs activities of department personnel during an assigned shift, consistent with divisional and departmental goals and objectives. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Assists watch commander in supervising the personnel and activities of assigned shift. 2. Receives complaints and requests for police assistance and assigns personnel and equipment to the scene of crimes. 3. Conducts pre—shift briefings providing information on current activities, actions, and investigations pertinent to shift operations. 4. Interviews suspect*, victims, complainants, and witnesses; gathers evidence from various sources; prepares reports concerning findings of evidence. 5. Investigates violations of federal, state, and local laws of some complexity; testifies in court concerning investigations. b. Conducts inspections and reviews officers performance to ensure departmental goals and objectives are achieved and assignments completed as assigned. 7. Trains and instructs recruit officers; completes recruit evaluations on an established schedule. S. Assists with research regarding specific crime, traffic, or non—criminal subjects. 9. Ensures cooperation and exchange of information needed for combined crime reduction efforts. 10. Inspects the use and maintenance of all equipment used by subordinates. 11. Provides all other patrol duties when necessary. g 12. Performs related duties as required. CORPORAL. Page Two DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Federal, state, local, civil, and criminal laws; functions, responsibilities, and procedures of a law enforcement office; practices and procedures for investigations; geography of the City and location of important buildings; correct use and care of firearms; some knowledge of basic supervisory practices and principles. Ability To: Supervise and assign subordinates in day-to-day operation; prepare clear and concise reports; apply judgement and discretion; deal courteously and firmly with the public; carry out investigations and analyze pertinent facts; apply effective and reasonable courses of action in apprehending violators; establish and maintain a harmonious and effective working relationship between divisions and with subordinates, peers, and supervisors; perform duties of a police Officer and Field Training Officer. Ikill In: Use and care of firearms; safe and efficient use of a motor vehicle, police radios, cameras, radar equipment, intoxilyzer, and related police equipment. K,VMWE AND TRAINING: Graduation from high school and two years college course work in law enforcement or a related field and three years satisfactory supori*nce as a police Officer; or any combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. @LgLI RY SPEGIAi REQUIREMENT$: Possession of a valid Oregon driver's license; intermediate SPST certification. sb103/sb4 �g y xr.x } SERGEANT "t GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A professional, sworn position that provides first-line supervision of subordinate police officers or investigators on an assigned shift including shift assignments and training of new recruit officers; investigates criminal offenses, accidents, and related problems; special team leader; does related work as required. SUPERVISION_RECEIVED: Works under the direction of the Division Commanders. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Responsible for the direct supervision of law enforcement personnel on an assigned shift or team. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Assigns, reviews, and analyzes the work performance of police officers for compliance with federal and state laws and departmental rules, regulations, and procedures, consistent with the department's mission and goal statement. 2. Conducts performance evaluation reviews to ensure fulfillment of the division and department goals and objectives. 3. Recommends hiring, firing, transfer, promotion, demotion, and takes appropriate disciplinary action towards employees assigned to area of responsibility, consistent with established policies and procedures. 4. Adjusts grievances of subordinate employees at the first step of the grievance procedure. S. Conducts reviews of, develops, plans, and implements division programs and procedures consistent with departmental objectives and policies. 6. Maintains budget control within area of responsibility and assists the division commander with program budget develop.ient. xs, 7. Identifies training needs; develops and provides in-service training to personnel. 9. Investigates complex violations of local, state, and federal laws; interviews suspects, victims, complainants, and witnesses. 9. Testifies in court concerning investigations; prepares reports concerning findings of evidence collected. 10. Ensures proper use and maintenance of all equipment used by the department through periodic inspections. 11. Coordinates with other city, county, state, and federal enforcement personnel on matters involving inter-jurisdictional investigations and operations. 12. Conducts research regarding specific crime or non-crime subjects. SERGEANT Page Two 13. Assigns directed patrols to targeted crime or traffic problem areas. 14. Assumes responsibility at the scene of major crimes and takes command of emergency situations until relieved by a superior officer. 15. Ensures close cooperation and exchange of information needed for combined crime reduction efforts with all other divisions. 15. Reviews assigned cases to ensure timely follow up investigation by subordinate personnel. 17. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge dge Of: Considerable knowledge of federal, state, local criminal and civil laws; functions, responsibilities, and procedures of a law enforcement office; principles of supervision, organization, and administration; investigative techniques; geography of area including location of important buildings; correct use and care of firearms. Ability To: Develop and apply supervisory skills; prepare clear and concise reports; carry out investigations, evaluate facts, and draw accurate conclusions; deal courteously and firmly with the public; evaluate personnel and programs, and to develop and recommend revised or new procedures, analyze situations quickly and objectively, and determine a proper course of action to be taken, establish and maintain a harmonious and effective working relationship between divisions and with subordinates, peers, and superiors; perform general patrol duties of a Corporal. Skil : Use and care of firearms; safe and efficient use of a motor vehicle, police radios, cameras, radar equipment, intoxilyzer, and related police equipment. p�RYENCE AND TRAINING: Graduation from high school with three years satisfactory experience as a Police Officer, two years college level law enforcement course work, and supervisory experience, or any combination of experience artd training as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL. REQUIREPR=NTS: BPST Advanced Certificate and possession of a valid Oregon driver's license. sb1O3lsb4 C L A S S I F I C A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N S GENERAL Helper Maintenance Worker Building Maintenance Custodian Utility Worker I Utility Worker II Utility Worker III Equipment Servicer II Equipment Mechanic III Building Inspector I Building Inspector II Building Inspector III Engineering Assistant Engineering Technician I Engineering Technician II Engineering Technician III office Aide office Assistant I Office Assistant II office Assistant III Senior Accounting Assistant Library Aide Library Assistant I Library Assistant II Library Assistant III EQUIPMENT OPERATOR'S TABLE UW III Advanced UW II UW Z MW Helper Technical Sr. Equip. Equip. Entry P/T Skill Operator Operator Semi—Skilled Laborer Backhoe PO 00 T Dozer PO O/T Graders PO O/T Articulated Mower PO O/T Hi—pressure Cleaner PO OO T Td & Grouting PO 00 T Welder PG O/T Larger Roller (Riding) PO 00 T Sweeper PO 00 T Patch Truck PO O0 T Dump Truck/Sander PO 0/T Dump Truck PO O/T Tractor/Mower Unit PO 00 T Riding Mower PO 00 T Small Rollers (Walk) PO 00 T Paint Striper PO 00 T Pavement Breakers PO 0/T Plate Compactor PO 0/T Chain Saw PO O/T Cut Offsaw PO O/T Hand Power Mower 0 Power Edger/Trimmer 0 Pressure Cleaner 0 (Parts) Weed Eaters (Whip) 0 0 Cars 0 Pickups PO = Primary Operator ' OO = occasional Operator O/T = Occasional or Training T = Training Only Under Supervision sbiO4/sb4 ri HELPER GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs a variety of unskilled manual tasks; may be assigned to any section of Public Works Operations Division, does related work as required; duties of their class are generally of a routine nature and does require physical exertion. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Operation Supervisor and may report for daily work assignments to a Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Assists in the maintenance, repair, cleaning of storm and sanitary sewer systems. 2. Assists in patching and repair of streets. 3. Removes brush and grass from road and walkways. 4. Loads and unloads rock, dirt, gravel, sweepings and other materials. 5. Assists with repairs to building, fixtures, fences, etc. b. Water, mows grass and trims hedges and trees. 7. Assists skilled and semi-skilled workers in their daily work. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Sufficient education and experience to provide the following abilities: 1. Ability to understand and follow oral instructions. 2. Ability to perform heavy manual labor for extsnded periods. 3. Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees and the public. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge of: Use of hand tools; safety precautions necessary to perform duties. Ability to: Perform heavy manual labor for extended periods of time in adverse weather conditions; understand and follow oral instructions; establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees. r'F i HELPER Page 2 SKILL IN: Use of hand tools. EXPERIENAND TRAINING: Experience or training which would demonstrate the CE ability to perform work as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT: Possession of or ability to obtain valid driver's license. sb104lsb4 k A 4 L �g 8 e ,� ��. �-�,,. :._F3✓ ,? g - _ to-.-,' - MAINTENANCE WORKER GENERAL STATEMENT Position. Perfa OF DUTIES: be assi �"$ a variety An entry-level greed to Y of unskilled maintenance and a required, any unit within the and semi-skilled operator Public Works Division manual tasks, may SUPERVISI • does related work as ON RECEIVED. Works under the Supervisor or Crew Chief. general supervision of the Operations �hP$RVISION EXER_ C� ISED Supervision pervision is not a r@sponsibility of position in EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL usually involve DUTIES: duties which all of the duties(Any single Position are not listed.) listed and of a class will many positions will not 1. Assists in the involve sanitar maintenance, repair. cleaning,Y sewer systems. g, and 2. inspection of storm and Assists in Patching and repair of street.. 3• Removes brush and grass from road and 4• L°ad$ and unloads walkways• hand or rackusing hand tools dirt, gravel 5• Assists sweepi",s, and other materials with repair, by to building, fixtures, fences. etc, • Sweep ' walks, waters and refuse and paper from Parks garounds. trims hedges and trees, and r Assists 'killed a emoves work. red semi-skilled Public Works employe.. 8• Controls traffic heir daily Projects. manually in t through and around construction and g• Assists with custodial maintenance Including cleaning of em responsibilities playas and for maintenance 10. Uses, assists, or Public access areas• of buildings Operator's Table and °Perates Public Works DESIRABLE Performs related work equipment per the ALIFICAT as required. Equipment IONS; K�nowleda��0 Use t Precautions °f hand tools necessary to and standard Perform duties. work Abilit_TO: Practices; safety adverse Perform heav weather Y manual labor instructions; conditions; for extended other establish a understand and follow Periods of employees and maintain effective oral time in the classif;cation supervisors; working and written 50 sufficiently Perfo oral onshi Pound items of Varying si bending, twists rm Physical r ps with Ping sizes, ng• reaching, and ,requirements of Iif Ing at least MAINTENANCE WORKER Page Two Skill In: Use of hand tools. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Experience or training which would demonstrate the ability to perform work as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT: Possession of or ability to obtain valid driver's license as issued by the State of Oregon. sb104/sb4 +ny+� z x 5Y. s BUILDING MAINTENANCE CUSTODIAN f skilled GENERAL STAT"EMENT OF DUTIES: Performs buildings Lando equipment Work miss maintenance and janitorial work on city generally routine in nature. Must be able to work variable shifts and be bondable. SUPERVISIONRECEIVED: Works under the general supervisisupervision frotions Superintendent and will receive assignments and daily the Operations Office. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of However, incumbents may occasionally positions in this classification. exercise lead responsibility for employees assisting in assigned tasks. single position ll not EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Anytions will lass iinvolveduties usually involve all the duties listed and many Po which are not listed). 1 As a member of a crew or individually, performs work in construction, city buildings, equipment and related city maintenance and repair of facilities. work on plumbing, electric and mechanical 2. performs routine maintenance system. g. Assists supervisor in setting up and maintaining work schedules and programs. ' 4. Maintain a safe, clean work area for employees and the public. 5. Wash, wax, polish, clean/vacuum carpet and floors. 6. Wash, and clean city buildings. 7. Maintain yard and flower beds. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: !Wg1ledae of: Standard methods, materials, tools, equipment, and technology of the trade; occupational hazards and safety precautions of building maintenance and of chemicals used in the trade. Ability to: Locate, diagnose and repair malfunctions of equipment and buildings. Understand and execute oral and written instructions; ther establersish ish and maintain effective working supervisors; work any type of shift, be self--motivated and work alone. Skill In: Use and care of tools, equipment and materials, chemicals of the building maintenance/custodian trade. E ri�nca and Train" ing: High school graduate or equivalent and two (2) years of custodial experience and three (3) years journeyman level building maintenance experience. Necessary Special Qualifications: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid drivers license. sb104/sb4 UTILITY WORKER I GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A basic operator position who performs a variety of semi—skilled manual tasks or operates light automotive and other equipment used in public works activities. May be assigned to any division within the Public Works Department; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Operations Supervisor or Crew Chief. SUPERVISION_ _EXERCISED: Supervision is not a responsibility of position in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Performs heavy manual labor, digging ditches, cleaning and installing culverts or drain tiles, cutting and burning brush, spraying brush, removing obstacles from roadway, storm and sewer drains and adjacent area, hand loading and unloading all types of materials onto trucks. 2. Does routine manual work connected with patching and repairing roadways; sands slippery or bleeding road surfaces; installs and repairs guard rails, fences, sign posts, and mail boxes. 3. Operates dump, platform or other types of light trucks and related equipment; operates a variety of heavy trucks and equipment for training purposes. A. Operates variety ofmo .►ing equipment, tractors, light trucks, and related small mechanical maintenance equipment. "i equipment. Maintains and repairs 5. Assists in the operation of high velocity sewer cleaning machinery and equipment. 6. Assists with operation of closed circuit video inspection equipment. 7. Mows, trims, and waters lawns in City parks on established schedule. Maintains trees and shrubs including trimming, pruning, fertilizing, planting, and watering. Maintains turf and planted areas by implementing fertilizing and weed/pest control program. 8. Cleans, repairs, and installs sanitary and storm lines, manholes, and catch basins. Inspects, cleans, and repairs storm drains. 9. Checks wastewater pump stations to ensure proper working order. 10. Assists with mapping of storm and sanitary lines. 11. Controls traffic manually through and around working areas; performs a variety of tasks in the maintenance of construction of storm drains and t'r.- ' sewers, and other public works projects. _ t k Y. r F UTILITY WORKER I Page Two es imaintenance of buildings, 12. Performs custodial responsibilitis repairs on buildings and or including cleaning of employee and Public access areas and maintenance of performs minor reps grounds, Cleans, paints, and P playground equipment. and nducts routine maintenance on refrigeration, heating' cooling. 13. Co .stems security systems' and plumbing Projects as 14. Completes basic carpentry, electrical, painting, required. Controlonstruction atid maintenance s traffic manually through tasksnd ainuthend c maintenance o construction 15 Pe a variety of projects, Pprojects- of r0 eCta. of highways, bridges, and other public works p j 16. Assists with preparation and installation of traffic signs. traffic 17. Prepares roads for use by installing traffic buttons, Painting lanes and markings'nart of a crew ndently on assigned tasks or as p 18. Works either d � Projects. assigned to ape nt per equipment Operator's Table and 19, Operates Public Works equipment performs related work as req C}` DESIRABLE ALIFICATI—ONS. perform -� tools, and equipment required to p Use of vehicles, and safety precautions in Usl of Know Of_: hazards. Perform duties: duties; practices, methods' nt, and tools required to Pe herbicides, materials, vehicles• equipment, techniques, shrub, and tree care and maintenance', landscaping pesticides, and their applications. riods of time Sufficiently perform physical labor for exter�netd r and hand abil_.___its 01 use and care for equiP�O written in adverse weather c rm duties; understand and follow oral and tools required to Pe independently; establish and maintain effective with hrkit instructions; work indepe supervisors; deal effectively he relationships witch Other be employees ble to peand form duties of Maintenance Worker public; and al classification. Skil1__I^: use and care of hand and power tools; operation of assigned vehicles, and machinery. ,equipment, or any AND TRAINING: Nigh school graduation or equivalency; EXPERIENCE which would demonstrate the ability to satisfactory experience or training h9 ing authority perform work as determined by to obtain valid ' Possession of or ability NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIRENIENT' he State of Oregon. driver's license as issues by sb1O4/sb4 UTILITY WORKER II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A skilled senior operator of a variety of medium to heavy sized trucks and equipment involving the manipulation of auxiliary controls; performs a variety of manual tasks associated with public works; does related work as required. May be assigned to any division within the Public Works Department. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Operations Supervisor or Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class, although some employees may occasionally be assigned lead responsibilities for specific work assignments. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Drives a truck in connection with the transportation of aggregates, asphalt, sand, rock, stone, and other materials; drives a truck with a snow plow attachment for removing snow from roads; drives special purpose trucks, as needed. 2. Operatics a loader in loading and moving gravel, rocks, dirt, solid waste, and other materials; operates a grader or dozer in moving or grading of a variety of materials or snow; operates a backhoe to dig trenches and backfill. Operates special purpose equipment, as needed. 3. Performs daily preventive maintenance on assigned equipment. 4. Performs a variety of manual tasks associated with public works projects and in conjunction with the operation of the equipment. S. Operates a variety of equipment requiring extremely close tolerances for grade alignment and contour for training purposes. s 6. Works either independently on assigned tasks or a part of crew assigned to specific projects. 7. Operates closed circuit video inspection equipment to determine problems in sanitary and storm lines, manholes, and catch basins. 9. Operates high velocity sewer cleaning machinery and equipment. 9. Repairs and installs sanitary and storm lines, manholes, and catch basins. 10. Inspects operations of wastewater pump stations to ensure proper working order and makes repairs. 11. Maintains up-to-date maps of storm and sanitary lines. 12. Maintains and repairs building and equipment requiring basic carpentry electrical and plumbing activities. UTILITY WORKER II �'` Page Two 13. Constructs and ensures proper installation of new and replacement traffic signs in accordance with Uniform Traffic Control Manual. 14. Estimates materials needed, orders and oversees storing and inventory control of traffic sign stock. 15. Operates Public Works equipment per equipment Operator's Table and performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Care of vehicles, equipment, machines, and tools required to perform duties: practices, methods, hazards, and safety precautions in use of materials and equipment required to perform duties; basic carpentry, electrical, and plumbing techniques. AbilityTo: Drive or operate vehicles, equipment, machines, and tools skillfully, safely, and in conformance with applicable laws, regulations, and work rules; detect needed repairs and make minor adjustments to equipment, machines, or tools needed to perform duties, understand and carry out written and oral instructions; work independently in performance of regular assignments; establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees, supervisors, and the public; function effectively in adverse weather conditions; perform basic carpentry, electrical, and plumbing tasks; read and understand blueprints and drawings; operate electronic video tracking equipment; and also must be able to perform duties of Utility Worker I classification. Skill n: Operation of assigned vehicles, equipment, machines, and tools; maintenance and repair of buildings. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Nigh school graduation or equivalence and three years experience and/or training at a level equivalent to Maintenance Worker I in the operation of maintenance equipment associated with this class, or any satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL QUALIFICATION: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid driver's license. sb1O4/sb4 iqT Y k` UTILITY WORKER III GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A Journeyman level position with advanced technical and senior operator skills in a variety of medium to heavy duty equipment; performs a variety of manual tasks a.sociated with public works, at a skilled or Journeyman level; does related work as required. May be assigned to any division within the Public Works Operations division. This position does involve high level of skills in construction and maintenance work. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Operations Supervisor and reports for daily work assignments to a Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class, although in the absence of the Crew Chief the employee may be assigned lead responsibilities or the employee may be assigned lead responsibilities for specific work assignments. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Drives a truck in connection with the transportation of aggregates, asphalt, sand, rock, stone, and other materials; drives a truck with a snow plow attachment for removing snow from roads; drives special purpose trucks, as needed. 2. Operates a loader in loading and moving gravel, rocks, dirt, solid waste, and other materials; operates a grader or dozer in moving or grading of a variety of materials or snow; operates a backhoe to dig trenches and backfill. Operates special purpose equipment, as needed. 3. Performs daily preventive maintenance on assigned equipment. 4. performs a variety of manual tasks associated with public works projects and in conjunction with the operation of the equipment. 5. Operates a variety of equipment requiring extremely close tolerances for grade alignment and contour for training purposes. 6. Works either independently on assigned tasks or a part of crew assigned to specific projects. 7. Operates closed circuit video inspection equipment to determine problems in sanitary and storm lines, manholes, and catch basins. 8. Operates high velocity sewer cleaning machinery and equipment. 9. Repairs and installs sanitary and storm lines, manholes, and catch basins. 10. Inspects operations of wastewater pump stations to ensure proper working order. ._ ' 11. Maintains up-to-date maps of storm and sanitary lines. ` 12. Maintains and repairs building and equipment requiring basic carpentry electrical and plumbing activities. UTILITY WORKER III Page Two 13. Constructs and ensures proper installation of new and replacement traffic signs in accordance with Uniform Traffic control Manual. 14. Estimates materials needed, orders and oversees storing and inventory control of traffic sign stock. 15. Operates Public Works equipment per equipment Operator's Table and performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Care of vehicles, equipment, machines, and tools required to perform duties; practices, methods, hazards, and safety precautions in use of materials and equipment required to perform duties; basic carpentry, electrical, and plumbing techniques. Ability To: Drive or operate vehicles, equipment, machines, and tools skillfully, safely, and in conformance with applicable laws, regulations, and work rules; detect needed repairs and make minor adjustments to equipment, machines, or tools needed to perform duties; understand and carry out written and oral instructions; work independently in performance of regular assignments; establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees, supervisors, and the public; function effectively in adverse weather conditions; perform basic carpentry, elQctrical, and plumbing tasks; _$ read and understand blueprints and drawings; operate electronic video tracking equipment; and perform duties of Utility Worker II classification. Skill In: Operation of assigned vehicles, equipment, machines, and tools; maintenance and repair of buildings. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Nigh school graduation or equivalence and three years experience and/or training at a level equivalent to Utility Worker II in the operation of maintenance equipment associated with this class; or any satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL 9a,1ALIFICATION: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid driver's license. -_ sb104/sb4 3A 2. 1..a `k3 a.: 'g EQUIPMENT SERVICER II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Lubricates, fuels, and does routine servicing of automotive vehicles, equipment, and machinery and other construction equipment; performs limited mechanical or electrical repairs; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Operations Supervisor and may receive daily supervision and work assignments from a Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of this classification. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed .and many positions will involve duties which are not listed ) 1. Services automobiles, trucks, tractors, mowers, and other public works equipment with fuel, oil, grease, water, and air; reports defects and need for repairs. 2. Maintains records of service to vehicles and equipment; schedules vehicles for maintenance and notifies departments. 3. Performs limited mechanical or electrical repairs on trucks and cars; installs headlights, lightbulbs, fuses, and other related electrical >- apparatus. 4. Performs equipment maintenance work, such as changing oil, filling or draining anti—freeze from radiators, replacing oil filters, and changing and balancing tires. 5. Assists mechanics occasionally as assigned. B. Maintains an inventory of replacement and repair parts; requisitions parts to replenish inventory. t 7. Maintains work area in clean, orderly manner. 8. Prioritize own workload as assigned. 9. Occasionally performs some Utility Worker I duties and assists with general city maintenance of buildings and utility operations. 10. Performs related work and emergency basic operation as Utility Worker I per Equipment Operator's Table as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Automotive and equipment lubrication and servicing methods and practices; mechanical parts and accessories. EQUIPMENT SERVICER II Page Two Ability To: Follow oral and written instructions; read and interpret manufacturers' lubrication and servicing manuals and charts; operate and maneuver automotive and heavy road equipment; maintain clean, orderly work area; make mathematical calculations; establish and maintain effective work relations with fellow employees and supervisors; keep accurate records; bend, stretch, and lift materials and tools required of at least 50 pounds in varying sizes; perform duties of a Utility Worker I. Skill In: Use of automotive and equipment servicing equipment and tools; servicing automotive vehicles, equipment, and machinery. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Nigh school graduation or equivalency and two years experience and/or training in maintaining and servicing fleet and maintenance equipment; or any satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Possession of or ability to obtain valid driver's license and have a good driving record. sb104/sb4 Jf Y _S f { EQUIPMENT MECHANIC III ' GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A Journeyman level position who performs mechanical repairs and modifications to automotive vehicles, equipment, and machinery and other construction equipment; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of the Operations Supervisor and may receive daily supervision and work assignments from a Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this classification. However, incumbents may occasionally exercise lead responsibility for employees assisting in assigned tasks and fill in during the absence of Crew Chief. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Performs a variety of skilled mechanical repairs and modifications to automotive vehicles, trucks, construction equipment, and machinery. 2. Performs diagnostic inspections of engines, using electronic or mechanical analyzing equipment in performing engine tune ups. 3. Perforans preventive maintenance on equipment by checking, repairing, or replacing brakes, steering gears, fuel pumps, carburetors, generators, and alternators. 4. Inspects, adjusts, and replaces components and related parts including cooling, fuel, and exhaust systems; replaces thermostats, fuel line filters, and mufflers. 5. Welds and modifies equipment and fabricates parts as needed or as directed. 6. Services automobiles, trucks, tractors, and other construction equipment with fuel, oil, grease, water, and air; reports defects for replacement on repair schedule. 7. Assists with major overhauls. 8. Assists supervisor in maintaining schedules and solving work problems. 9. Maintains safe, clean work area. 10. Assists with building and grounds maintenance and repair. 11. Occasionally performs some Utility Worker I duties and assists with general city maintenance of buildings and utility operations. 12. Basic and emergency operation of equipment per Equipment Operator's Table and performs related work as required. EQUIPMENT MECHANIC III page Two tools, equipment, and Standard methods. materials.piples; functioning of DESIRABLE QUAEIFICATIONS: mechanical p precautions of technology of the mechanic trade; combustion engines; occupational hazards and safety chniques. internal combo variety of welding mechanic trade: diesel—powered equipment: it most mechanical malfunctions in execute Ability To: Locate, diagnose, and repair understand and automotive and construction equipment and machines: instructions; layout, plan, and work from sketches; establish oral and written relationships with other workers and and maintain peffective erform duties of workingre Servicer classification. supervisors; pe equipment, and materials of the mechanic Skill In: Use and cera of defects in equipment. trad Oe 11 eating and adjusting ivalency and three EX ERIE AND TRAINING: High school graduation or �c�uding experience in preferably satisfactory ourneyman level mechanic experience, or any years fleet and maintenance equipment-, hiring maintaining and repairing experience and training as determined by equivalent combination of authority' to obtain a valid ALIEICATIQNS: possession of or ability NE SSARY SPECIAL ood driving record. driver's license and have a 9 sbl04/sb4 } x R 'n;::'� af,:y, r..� 4 ."s'� ',:�`a y .z� :x — -•{ �`:q�'ere srSW2Y' t..., # _ BUILDING INSPECTOR I GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs inspections of buildings and structures in order to ascertain that construction and alterations are done in compliance with applicable codes and plans; does related city code enforcement work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the direction and supervision of the Building Official or Inspector of a higher level. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Conducts plans reviews and field inspections of buildings and structures of the nature and size allowed by the C level state certification. 2. Issues building permits and other construction and alteration permits after computing related fees. 3. Recommends, or takes appropriate action to ensure compliance of construction with plans and applicable codes. A. Consults with and advises contractors and builders regarding applicable regulations. 5. Performs field checks of driveways and sidewalks. $. Investigates code enforcement complaints, contacts violators to suggest action for compliance, and follows Civil Infractions Code procedures to compel resolution of the complaint. 7. Assists other departments, contractors, and the public by responding to inquiries at the counter, by phone, and by mail. f 8. Works independently with limited supervision and direction. 9. Performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Principles and practices of zoning codes; government legal procedures and terminology in the area of engineering and planning; construction codes and regulations, materials, techniques, and accepted safety standards; proper inspection techniques; planning, engineering, architecture, or related field. Ability_ To: Establish effective working relationships with other workers, supervisors, property owners, builders, and the general public; investigate and assure compliance with the building and zoning codes; understand and y . execute oral and written instructions; interpret blueprints, plans, and specifications; work independently in performance of regular assignments; function effectively in adverse weather conditions; bend, stretch, and lift materials, tools, and equipment of at least SO pounds in varying sizes. BUILDING INSPECTOR I Page Two EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: State certification at the C level as a Plans Examiner and Structural Inspector. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid driver's license and have a good driving record. sb104/sb4 4 BUILDING INSPECTOR II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs inspections of buildings and structures in order to ascertain that construction and alterations are done in compliance with applicable codes and plans; does related code enforcement work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the direction and supervision of the Building Official or Inspector of a higher level. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will 'involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Conducts plans reviews and field inspections of buildings and structures of the nature and size allowed by the B level state certification. 2. Issues building permits and other construction and alteration permits after computing related fees. 3. Recommends, or takes appropriate action to ensure compliance of construction with plans and applicable codes. 4. Consults with and advises contractors and builders regarding applicable regulations. 5. Performs field checks of driveways and sidewalks. 6. Investigates code enforcement complaints, contacts violators to suggest action for compliance, and follows Civil Infractions Code procedures to compel resolution of the complaint. 7. Assists other departments, contractors, and the public by responding to inquiries at the counter, by phone, and by mail. i 9. Works independently with limited supervision and direction. 9. Performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Principles and practices of zoning codes; government legal procedures and terminology in the area of engineering and planning; construction codes and regulations, materials, techniques, and accepted safety standards, proper inspection techniques, planning, engineering, architecture, or related field. Ability To: Establish effective working relationships with other workers, supervisors, property owners, builders, and the general public; investigate and assure compliance with the building and zoning codes; understand and execute oral and written instructions; interpret blueprints, plans, and f specifications; work independently in performance of regular assignments; function effectively in adverse weather conditions; perform duties of Building Inspector Level C classification. \ BUILDING INSP CTA II . Page Two :. . i EXPERIENCE ANO TRAINING: Sa■ certification at the B level as a Plans / Examiner and Structural Inspector and State certification at the c level as \« Mechanical Inspector. NECESSARY SPECIAL R oU R� : Possession o or ability to in a valid : \% driver', license and have a good driving record. «\ sbIO/sb4 � �/ . . . . . BUILDING INSPECTOR III GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs inspections of buildings and structures of all complexities in order to ascertain that construction and alterations are done in compliance with applicable codes and plans; enforces building codes and zoning regulations; does related code enforcement work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED. Works under the direction and supervision of the Building Official. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class although some employees may occasionally be assigned lead responsibilities for specific work assignments. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Conducts plans reviews and field inspections of buildings and structures of the nature and size allowed by the A level state certification. 2. Issues building permits and other construction and alteration permits after- computing related fees. 3. Recommends, or takes appropriate action to ensure compliance of construction with plans and applicable codes. 4. Consults with and advises contractors and builders regarding applicable regulations. 5. Performs field checks of driveways and sidewalks. 6. Investigates code enforcement complaints, contacts violators to suggest action for compliance, and follows Civil Infractions Code procedures to compel resolution of the complaint. 7. Assists other departments, contractors, and the public by responding to inquiries at the counter, by phone, and by mail. 8. Works independently with limited supervision and direction. x 9. Performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Principles and practices of zoning codes; government legal procedures and terminology in the area of engineering and planning; construction codes and regulations, materials, techniques, and accepted safety standards; proper inspection techniques, planning, engineering, architecture, t or related field. Ability To: Establish effective working relationships with other workers, _ supervisors, property owners, builders, and the general public; investigate and assure compliance with the building and zoning codes, understand and execute oral and written instructions; interpret blueprints, plans, and specifications; work independently in performance of regular assignments; function effectively in adverse weather conditions; perform duties of Building Inspector Level B classification. BUILDING INSPECTOR III Page Two t EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: State certification at the A level as a Plans Examiner, Structural Inspector, Mechanical Inspector, and Fire/Life Safety Plans Examiner. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid driver's license and have a good driving record. sb1O4/sb4 =i E8 tit 7 S� ENGINEERING ASSISTANT tv. GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs one or more routine engineering clerical or limited skill engineering support functions in the field or office; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of a section manager and may report for daily work assignments to a Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Clears brush, drives stakes, holds chain or rod; operates survey equipment in a training capacity. 2. Performs routine drafting, sketching, tracing, and lettering in preparation of maps, cross sections, plans, and plat layouts. 3. Updates existing drawings and maps. 4. Assists in routine inspections of construction projects; maintains appropriate inspection records; performs routine materials tests or prepares samples for testing. 5. Installs traffic volume counters at designated locations; retrieves counters at and of prescribed period; records traffic count. assists in studies assembling, computing, and expanding road data. 6. Performs various inventory control functions. 7. Makes basic engineering related mathematical computations including plottinq grades and computing cost estimates. r 6. Posts public notices, performs document and file maintenance and research. 9. Performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Mathematics; survey techniques, instruments and tools; drafting methods and instruments; engineering maps and records. Skill In: Care and use of equipment and instruments used in surveying and drafting. Ability To: Understand and execute oral and written instruction; interpret engineering plans and specifications; work out—of—doors in adverse weather conditions; perform mathematical calculations: sketch and draw maps and plans; establish and maintain effective working relationships with other workers, supervisors, and the public; bend, stretch, and lift materials, tools, and equipment of at least 50 pounds in varying sizes. ENGINEERING ASSISTANT Page Two t EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: High school graduation or equivalency or satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT: Possession of or the ability to obtain a valid driver's license. sbiO4/sb4 r 5 1 _ ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs a variety of technical engineering work in the field or office; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of a section manager and may report for daily work assignments to a Crew Chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not a normal responsibility of Positions in this class, although some employees may be occasionally assigned supervisory responsibilities for specific projects. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Performs a variety of surveying assignments; operates a transit or level to turn horizontal and vertical angles for profiles, cross—sections, slopes, setting grades, and running control lines; prepares field notes, sketches, and other records; participates in running chain, rodding, and cutting brush as required by the project; locates monuments or other established control points. 2. Performs a variety of design and drafting assignments; reduces survey Field notes to engineering drawings; drafts plans, profiles, cross-sections, and cut and fill drawings; computes grades, curves, areas, and material quantities; maintains and updates engineering maps i' and drawings; prepares as—built drawings. 3. Performs less complex inspections of private and public construction projects such as driveway aprons, • sidewalks and street patching for compliance with plans/specifications and city codes and maintains Inspection records. A. Assists other departments and the public, responding to inquiries in person, by telephone and by mail. t S. Conducts day and occasional night street, transportation route, traffic control device inventories and inspections, recording and maintaining data. 6. Conducts traffic and turning movement counts recording and maintaining data. 7. Conducts speed zone and travel time studies recording and maintaining data. 8. Assists in collection of inspection samples, inspection of construction sites for compliance with approved plans, standards and specifications. 9. Prepares accident report summaries identifying problem locations. �Y10. Works independently or as part of a crew assigned to specific projects. ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I it. Conducts or participates tes in special engineering projects; organizes materials or information; researches data; and prepares reports of findings and recommendations. 12. Performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: 'Survey and drafting methods, techniques, instruments and tools; mathematics and trigonometry, as applied to technical engineering; engineering maps and records; principles of traffic engineering and regulations governing fice engineering instruments; making drafts, Skill In: Use of field or of sketches or tracings of maps and plans. Ability To: Interpret engineering plans andspecifications; perform variety of technical engineering work; work out of doors for extended periods in adverse weather conditions; sake accurate mathematical computations and maintain accurate records; follow oral and written instructions; establish and maintain effective work relationships with fellow employees and supervisors; assume project chief responsibilities; sketch and draw maps and plans; use hand tools and equipment; research files to obtain full, accurate data; write complete, concise reports; perform duties of Engineering Aide classification. EXPERIENCE M TRAINING: High school graduation or equivalency and one year traffic engineering, surveying or drafting college coursework or experience; or satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL 9MALIFICATIQ_N$: Possession of or the ability to obtain a valid driver's license. sb1O4/sb4 y 1'. i k ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs technical engineering responsibilities in one or more specialized off2ne2rin field nctaggign�nes soften ng rrequiveyinre drafting, and inspecting of eng g projects; independent performance of functions; does relates work as required. SUPERVISYON RECEIVED: Works under the general supervision of a section manager and may report for project or daily assignments to a crew chief. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: May be assigned lead worker responsibilities for technicians of a lower classification. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve a21 of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Acts as instrument technician in directing a survey crew involved in determining preliminary lines or road location and performing other land survey work. rawings and working plans of engineering projects 2, prepares and revises d working from field notes, rough sketches, and verbal instructions, prepares plans of engineering projects including access roads, PiPe lines, drainage, retaining walls, traffic signal and illumination installations, channelization plans, may prepare and review estimates mas and specifications; checks the work of other engineering personnel; may of City participate in the development of as--built drawings and updating maps. 3. Maintains records and prepares periodic reports on status of engineering projects. ;. Determines topography of ground by elevation and location. S. Assists in cost analysis and estimates. i 6, Sets construction points for roads, bridges, culverts, etc. from notes W-4 maps. ty Contacts and confers with private contractors beingacperformed indpublicl rights vers regarding constructio way. geodetic ions and 8. Searches for and tionsstor position cotrnersson o a geodeticgrid s t for updating uses these nta mapping. 3 9, performs a variety of inspection work on compliance with assigned construction appropriate insures h specifications and plans; pe materials tests and takes samples for later testing; maintains required notes and records; determines continuance of construction projects based } on contractor's adherence to specifications and plans; uses a variety of equipment and instruments in inspection work. ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II / Page Two L 10. Testifies in court regarding disputed lines and in accident cases. 11. Files and updates official records. 12. Assists other departments and the general public by responding to questions pertaining to services of the department. 13. Reviews and issues permits. 14. Investigates complaints and takes or recommends action for resolution. 15. Inputs geographic information with data from city control and other municipal data into computer and other record systems. various reports; including the sanitary sewer mileage report, 16. may prepare street mileage report, and annexation boundary report. 17. Performs related work as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Mathematics, including trigonometry as applied to field surveying. engineering computations and designs, practices and procedures engineering civil enginearing and construction works; surveying equips+@ principles and practices; materiaci lels wd and equipment techniques, tomated d in technical engineering work; supervisory principles systems; traffic engineering principles, Practices and procedures. lens and specifications; perform a variety Ability To: Interpret engineering P work assignments; work out of doors for of specialized technical engineering conditions; s++pervise the work of extended periods of time in adverseand workingte others; make accurate mathematical rcal calculations establish in tructions;cuestablish and research legal docuaaen maintain effective working erel�ernshipsing r�ss a subordinates, performsduties soof and the public; prepare ng Engineering Technician I classification. Sk 11 In; Use of field and concengineering reports-, making coextensions and equipment: ise and drafting, writing complete, understanding units of measure. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: High school graduation or equivalency and two years experience and/or college course work in technical engineering; or satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. CESSARY SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid driver's license. sb104/sb4 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN III GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs advanced engineering work of a technical nature in the investigation, location, design, inspection or construction of engineering projects; incumbent may be assigned to a specialized area; assignments require independent pe-formance of technical engineering functions; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under supervision of a section manager, who reviews work performance for results obtained. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervises a variable number of technical engineering personnel engaged in surveying, design, construction, inspection or special proect work. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Receives, circulates, and checks public street, sewer and subdivision development construction plans and street opening permit construction pians to assure conformance to City standards, specifications and design review conditions; resolves deficiencies and conflicts; coordinates plan review process; approves and issues final plan to principals. 2. Determines document requirements for public street, sewer and subdivision development, construction projects; prepares, processes and provides construction agreements, performance bond and street opening permit documentation; resolves problems; coordinates documentation process, approves and issues street opening permits to applicants. 3. Receives land-use and site development review request application; Investigates site; researches relevant public records; prepares and provides a written response pertinent to the City and general public's best interest; provides public improvement civil engineering and construction code information to staff and potential applicants at pro-application conferences and also over the telephone and publif counter. 4. Develops, organizes and maintains public street, seder and subdivision development construction project and street opening permit project records and files. S. Prepares Ordinances and Resolutions as may be necessary. 6. Responds to staff and citizen requests for public information at the public counter, over the telephone and by mail. ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN III Page Two 7. Prepares, reviews and revises drawings and working plans of city engineering projects, works from field notes, rough sketches and verbal instruction; including roads, pipe lines, parks, drainage, retaining walls, channelization plans; may prepare and review bid documents, cost and material estimates and specifications; may participate in the development of "as build" drawings and the update of city maps. 8. Assists in city construction project activities; acquires and evaluates lab test reports of material samples for compliance with plans/specifications and city codes. Assists in the coordination of the city construction activity with utility agencies, private contractors and individual propertyowners; completes various status reports and prepares or obtains as built drawings. 9. Conducts complex traffic studies and problem report investigation; prepares reports and maintains records. May function as a "Traffic Engineering Technician." 10. Overseas and coordinates surveying activities within the department; supervises and assigns locations to be surveyed; participates in surveys, as needed. 11. Prepares legal descriptions and makes cost analyses and estimates. 12. Reviews the work of drafting personnel and assigns projects; coordinates activities. 13. May coordinate and oversee all inspection and traffic gathering activities; prepares reports and makes recommendations; participates in a variety of other technical engineering activities. 14. Inputs geographic information with data from city control and other mtmicipaRll data into computer and other record systema. 16. May inspect more complex private andt street k sewer installations for compliance with Plan/specifications and city codes. T 16. Investigates citizen complaint reports and relatingto the property damage reports public $actor and takes action to resolve problems. _ 17. Performs related work as required. i �tr;" .., T' r y A YN «yzm+ .'!.�°`a� .•.k i� '�'.� 71*S � �'.�T't Y .Y iP'L' �� �iu _ ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN III Page Three DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge of: Principles, practices and techniques of civil engineering; methods employed in land surveying and use of appropriate instruments and equipment; public construction and inspection methods and materials and testing techniques; principles of engineering designing procedures; mathematics including trigonometry and their application to engineering problems; property mapping systems; drafting principles, methods and practices; supervisory techniques including training, evaluating, motivating and disciplining subordinates. AbilitrM To: Plan and coordinate engineering projects; read and interpret federal, state and local laws and regulations;g perform precise survey and design work; make complex calculations; reduce field notes; prepare plans and designs for public works and utilities projects; use specialized office, field and laboratory equipment and instruments; interpret engineering plans and specifications; gather and correlate data from various sources and produce final plan or major chart; conduct research and draw up deed descriptions; make complex mathematical computations; read, interpret and apply engineering plans and specifications; supervise and inspect the work of contractors to obtain adherence to plans and specifications; establish and maintain effective working relationships with subordinates, peers, supervisors and public and private officials; understand and execute oral and written instructions; work independently in performance of regular assig;,mants; assign and evaluate the work of others; enter data into computer; write complete, concise reports. Skill In: Uses of dr.`F:ny machines and instruments; use of office and field surveying insteusoents and equipment. EXPERIEWX AND TRAINING: Associate degree in civil engineering from an accredited institution or completion of an Engineer in Training Certificate and threey ears progressively more responsible experience in engineering; or satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring supervisor. E SECESSARY SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Possession of or ability to obtain valid driver's license. T sbIO4/sb4 x� �r y x^^� ( OFFICE AIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES: Performs a variety of entry level and basic routine clerical tasks; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the supervision and direction of an administrative employee and may receive daily supervision and assignments from a clerical employee of a higher classification. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Operates photo copy machine, collating and stapling as required. 2. Opens, sorts and distributes mail. 3. Retrieves and delivers materials and supplies for department. 4. Sorts and files materials alphabetically, numerically or by other predetermined categories. 5. Tallies data for inclusion in reports. 6. Types address labels and forms. 7. Conducts population counts for census. 9. Prepares materials for shipment or mailing. 9. Removes materials from files upon request. 10. Performs receptionist duties, answering routine inquiries, greeting the public for training purposes. 4 DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Office practices and procedures. Ability To: Understand and follow oral and written instructions, operate office equipment; operate a typewriter to sufficiently perform duties, work without close supervision; meet and respond to the public in a courteous, efficient manner; establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees and supervisors; file according to established procedures; make simple mathematical computations accurately and rapidly; learn assigned clerical tasks and adhere to department routines; carry or transport up to 35 pounds of material up stairs. Skills In: Operation of office machines and equipment as required to successfully perform the duties of the position. �.C,•8 ETA .'�%".. .:�" .,a r..:. ...r..+t...ar qtr.s :4aA OFFICE AIDE Page Two EXPERIENCE * AND TRAINING: Nigh School graduation or equivalency and work experience in an office environment or coursework in office practices and procedures; or any satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. NECESSARY SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: Possession of or ability to obtain a valid driver's license and have a good driving record. sb104/sbA f. d, t� Str t c 8r F a r OFFICE ASSISTANT I GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs secretarial and clerical duties according to established standard procedures; duties include operation of standard office machines; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the supervision and direction of an administrative employee and may receive daily supervision and assignments from a clerical employee of a higher classification. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Operates typewriter, word processor or computer to prepare forms, reports, correspondence, requisitions, simple tabulations and other materials from copy, rough draft, dictating machine or simple oral instructions. 2. Sorts, codes files and indexes materials alphabetically or numerically; conducts file and record searches, logs in documents for public record. 3. Posts information to various departmental, fiscal, billing or other records according to standard procedures; compiles reports containing tallied posted data and basic mathematical calculations. 4. Serves as receptionist or counter clerk answering routine inquiries, providing general information, forms and documents to the public; refers callers to appropriate department. 5. Opens, sorts and distributes mail, maintains files, distributes bulletins. 6. Prepares materials for shipment or mailing, receives shipments and checks invoices. t T. Operates duplicating and copying equipment, collating and stapling as required. 9, Accepts payments from the public in cash and checks, issuing receipts. 9. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Business English, spelling, punctuation and arithmetic; modern office practices and procedures;, standard office equipment and machines. OFFICE ASSISTANT I Page Two t� Ability To: Communicate effectively, orally and in writing, establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees, workers and supervisors; meet and respond to the public in a courteous, efficient manner; learn and perform assigned tasks quickly and accurately from oral and written instruction; make appropriate decisions within well-defined guidelines; learn the operation of standard office machliness and duties n; make simple computations accuratelyand quickly; perform e classification. Skill In: Operation of standard office machinery and equipment as required by position. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: High School graduation or equivalency and one year clerical support experience, or any satisfactory combination of training and experience as determined by the hiring authority. ab104/sb4 OFFICE ASSISTANT II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A skilled Secretarial/Clerical position performs clerical duties of variety and increasing complexity often involving multiple steps in procedures and requiring judgment in applications of department policies, laws anti regulations controlling work assignment; uses own initiate to accomplish tasks within prescribed work assignment; may provide clerical support to a number of professional or administrative employees within a department. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the supervision and direction of an administrative employee and may receive daily supervision and assignments from a clerical employee of a higher classification. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Positions in this class may have lead worker responsibilities over one or more employees. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Performs a range of advanced and complex clerical duties including composition of correspondence, maintenance and analysis of records, preparation of statistics and reports. 2. Interprets laws, regulations, policies and procedures in order to obtain from or provide information to other work units, organizations or the public. 3. Operates typewriter, word processor or computer to prepare forms, reports, minutes of meetings, correspondence, and requisitions from copy, rough draft, dictating machine, oral instru:.tions or self composition, applying full range of vocabulary, grammar and office procedures knowledge. 4. Receives, reviews, adjusts and records documents and reports requiring use of technical subject—matter knowledge. t 5. Schedules meetings, notifying participants, posting notices, preparing materials. 6. Reviews or checks work performed by others, locating and correcting arrors, advising of proper procedures and assisting in training of new - duties. :{ 7. Advises general public on interpretation of laws, city ordinances and departmental regulations and procedures. S. Assists in maintaining various fiscal and personnel records; posts and balances receipts, prepares bank deposits. 9. Performs related duties as required. OFFICE ASSISTANT II Page Two DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Standard office practices and procedures; office recordkeeping spelling, punctuation and arithmetic; basic and reporting; easiness English, bookkeeping principles. Ability TO: Coaamanicate effectively and appropriately orally and in writing; interpret and apply program information in making work decisions or supplying it information to others; organize own workload efficiently and make appropriate decisions concerning work methods; maintain specialized records and prepare narrative or statistical reports form information gathered, make accurate, arithmetic computations or apply standardized statistical or mathematical machine; operate full scope of Office equipment and procedures, manually or by machines; transcribe meeting notes and minutes; establish and maintain effective working relationship with subordinates, peers and supervisors; train, supervise and coordinate the work of others; understand and execute written and oral instructions; meet and respond to public and private officials in a courteous, efficient manner; organize workload in a logical, _ efficient manner; work independently; work effectively in stressful situations meeting required deadlines; attend occasional evening meetings; and pe rform duties of Office Assistant I classification. Skil1 In: Operation of standard office machines; written and oral communication. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Nigh S graduation raduation or equivalency and three years progressively more responsible clerical support experience; or any satisfactory combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. sb10A/sb4 —a-.:szx,a. :fit, r _ ••� OFFICE ASSISTANT III GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: A Senior Secretarial/Clerical position performs complex and varied clerical functions involving the interpretation and application of departmental policies governing the work performed; may provide direct clerical support to administrator at the senior management level or may supervise a distinct clerical unit; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the direction of a senior manager who reviews work for conformance with policy. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Positions in this class may exercise direct supervision over assigned clerical personnel, often in a specialized clerical function. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many position will involve duties which are now listed.) 1. Assumes responsibility for major department activities insuring compliance with laws and established procedures; monitors activities within scope of responsibility. 2. Answers varied inquiries; explains policies and procedures and arranges appointments. 3. Arranges committee meetings including coordinating selection of the time and place; ascertains possible conflicts; makes reservations and notifies participants; prepares agendas and meeting materials. 4. Attends meetings recording matters discussed and action taken; prepares minutes of meetings. 5. Prepares a variety of correspondence, reports and other materials from direct or machine transcription, rough draft, general instructions or self—initiation. t 6. Receives, sorts, analyzes and summarizes material for preparation- of reports; relays and interprets administrative decision, policies and instructions. 7. Compiles data for questionnaires and public reports, performing necessary investigations in developing the information; prepares work sheets and tables of some complexity and makes computations of materials assembled; maintains financial, personnel and department transaction records. 8. Supervises clerical unit, trains new employees and current employees in new duties; assigns work according to changing needs within the department. 9. Devises new forms, formats and procedures as necessary. 10. Maintains records and reports not requiring special accounting techniques but requiring involved procedural determinations. OFFICE ASSISTANT III Page Two ' 11. Assists supervisor on a variety of administrative details and projects. 12. Schedules and coordinates use of public facilities. 13. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Standard secretarial and office prectices and procedures; punctuation, arithmetic; composition and grammar; Business English, spelling, P rinciples; office record keeping and reporting Procedures; basic bookkeeping p management. tmental public Ability To: rdepar Use tact, cd�iQ$retoodnln and es, regulations and procedures attend contacts; learn city orally occasional evening meetings; communicate effectively and and in writing, organize work efficiently and make appropriategeneralrecords concerning work methods and priorities, maintain fiscal and machines; take and w. and files, operate the full scope of office minute equipment testablish and maintain : � .: transcribe direct dictation and meeting era and supervisors; ; effective working relationships with subordinate, Pe train, supervise and coordinate the work of others; maintain specialized records and prepare narrative or statistical reports from information standardized gathered; make accurate arithmetic computations or apply g statistical or mathematical procedures manually or by machine, understand and t execute written and oral instructions; organize work load in a logical efficient manner; use good, independent judgment in making decisions; work effectively in stressful situations meetingne performdutiescomprehend q fiche interpret pertinent laws, rules and regulations; Assistant II classification. �� Skips: operation of standard office machines; written and oral coaounication. t (PERIENCE AND High school graduation or equivalency and five years 1RAIi�It�i_: progressively more responsible experience including lead worker or supervisor responsibilities; or any hiringasuthorityy combination of experience and training as determined by sb1o4/sb4 SENIOR ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT IV GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs a variety of bookkeeping and double entry tasks in maintenance of general and subsidiary records involving independent judgment in properly recording and documenting fiscal transactions; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the supervision and direction of an administrative or accounting supervisor who provides technical assistance on unusual or difficult bookkeeping problems. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervisionis not normally a responsibilityleof positions in this class although employees mayassigned responsibilities in supervising Office Aides or volunteers. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Maintains varied and complex records associated with accounting functions such as budget control, activity control, financial transactions such as personnel, equipment and materials. 2. Compiles data and prepares summaries, statements, statistical and other business reports. 3. Prepares and processes payroll information for new hires and terminations. 4. Gathers payroll data for City employees; verifies deductions, time worked; processes data; prepares checks on semi—monthly basis. S. Computes employer paid contributions and distributes to appropriate budget accounts; prepares all payroll deduction and payroll benefit reports; prepares payment for all federal and state d'a'y distributes ll premiums to all insurance companies and retirement groups; payroll to appropriate accounts; posts payroll and balances deductions. t 6. Makes journal entries and posts to general ledger. 7. Makes approved transfers to and from budgetary accounts and balances accounts against control data. 8. Maintains a variety of accounts receivable, billing appropriately; posting payments to proper accounts; preparing reports on collections; preparing balances and periodic statements. 9. Prepares reconciliation sheets, maintaining accounting and fund records according to established account classifications and involving a wide range of bookkeeping methods. 10. Performs related duties as required. 4� k: t SENIOR ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT IV page Two DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS lied to governmental Knower Of: Bookkeeping principles and practices as app i standards, methods and procedures; fiscal records and account ng, business roll processes. preparation of fiscal reports; pay Perform detailed work involving numerical or written data; apply Ability(To� principles to the maintenance of payrall, fiscal book epin9 and accounting P Cations re re necessary records ar,d statements; tke inabulate volved st tistical varied pa compo accurately and rap Y machines, including computer; reportsng ; use standard office and bookkeeprrkinglationships with other employees establish and maintain effective Wobli in an effective, tactful manner; load and and supervisors; deal with the Pu understand and execute oral and written instructions;rf rgrmani re�rnsib 1 ties with limited supervision; Pe problems; bend. work independently in stressful situations; solve p thoroughly and accurately stretch and lift materials, tools and equipment as needed' chines including Sk ll Tn: Operation of standard office and bookkeeping ma - commuter• and three TR High school graduation or equivalency • responsible accounting experience, preferably using EK RT ire s,.espo years pro9r�ssively municipalaccounting procedures: or any sauthorityry combination of experience and education as determined by the hiring sb1O4/sb4 t h> W fid 4' F LIBRARY AIDE _ GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs clerical functions for a variety of activities within the library including shelving, filing, circulation and typing; work is routine and performed in accordance with specific instructions; performs related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the direction of an Assistant Librarian; however, daily supervision may be provided by a Library Assistant who assigns work and reviews for conformance with established practices and procedures. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) 1. Works at the circulation desk checking in and out books and materials and providing general library information. 2. Types and files catalog cards for public catalog. 3. Assists in processing overdue notices. 4. Searches reserves. t_ S. Types and files registration cards. b. Shelves books and other materials. 7. Assists in maintenance of collection. S. Assists with inter—library loan program. 9. Performs relatbd duties as required DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: t Knowlodge Of• Office procedures and practices. Ability To: Understand and follow oral and written instructions; establish and maintain effective working relationship with other employees and supervisors; deal effectively and tactfully with the public; alphabetize and file accurately; learn the Dewey Decimal System; learn routine processes within the training period; write legibly and maintain neat, accurate records; perform a variety of assignments as necessary to balance workload; operate standard office machines; physically perform the duties including bending, reaching and lifting up to 35 pounds. Skill In: Operation of standard office equipment. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Graduation from, or current attendance at high a school; or any satisfactory combination of _ Y experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. sbiO4/sb4 �n LIBRARY ASSISTANT I GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs clerical duties for a variety of functions within the library according to established standard procedures which can readily be learned with training on the job; duties include operation of standard office machines; does related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the supervision and direction of an Assistant Librarian and may receive daily supervision and assignments from a Library Assistant of a higher classification. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) I. Assists at the circulation desk checking materials in and out, collecting fines and lost book charges and providing library information to patrons. 2. Registers library users, types user cards and maintains files. 3. Shelves books and other materials. 4. Assists in processing overdue notices. 5. Types correspondence, reports and other materials for Librarian. 6. Assists with cataloging, handling new books and materials, and checking cards and shelflists. 7. Assists in maintenance of collection. S. Assists with inter-library loan program. 9. Searches files. i 10. Types and files catalog cards for public catalog. It. Operates duplicating and copyirri equipment, collating and stapling as required. 12. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Standard office practices and procedures; 0 y Decimal System. t w LIBRARY ASSISTANT I Page Two Ability To: Establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees and supervisors; COMM casraldeffectively n eainstructions,; wctfully with ork public; understand manner; operate standard independently completing assignments in a timely both numerically and office equipment; file quickly and accurately alphabetically; learn library procedures; learn the Dewey Decimate System; write legibly and maintain neat, accurate records; physically pe duties including bending, reaching and lifting; perform duties of Library Aide classification. Skill In: Operation of standard office equipment including typewriter. EXPERIENCE AND TRAIMING: High school graduation or equivalency and general office- experience,the hiringy satisfactory combination of experience and training as determined y sb104/sb4 } LIBRARY ASSISTANT II GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs clerical and para—professional duties for a variety of activities within the library including circulation, user registration, overdue records, filing and typing. Performs related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the direction of an Assistant Librarian. However, daily assignments may be provided by a Library Assistant of a higher classification. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Supervision is not normally a responsibility of positions in this class, although some employees may occasionally be assigned lead responsibilities for specific work assignments. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL _DUTIES: (Any single position of a sil ss will not usually involve all of the duties listed and many Potions lve duties which are not listed.) 1. Works at the circulation desk checking materials in and out, collecting fines and lost book charges and providing library information to patrons. 2. Registers library users, types user cards and maintains files. 3. Maintains book reserves and associated files. N. Assists in processing overdue notices and maintaining statistics. S. Types correspondence, reports and other materials for Librarian. 6. Assists with cataloging, handling new books and materials, and checking cards and shelf lists. 7. Occasionally responsible for library operation in absence of more senior staff members. B. Processes donated books and materials into system. _ ! 9. Searches files. 10. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE 2MALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Practices, principles and philosophy of modern library procedures sufficient to perform assigned duties, standard office practices and procedures; Dewey Decimal System. LIBRARY ASSISTANT II _ Page Two Ability To: Exercise good judgment in carrying out library policies; establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees and supervisors; communicate effectively and deal tactfully with the public; understand and follow oral and written instructions, work independently completing assignments in a timely manner; operate standard office equipment; file quickly and accurately both numerically and alphabetically; learn library procedures; physically perform the duties including bending, reaching and lifting; perform duties of Library Aide classification. fi Skill In: Operation of standard office equipment including typewriter. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Nigh school graduation or equivalency and two years general office experience; or any satisfactory combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. sb104/sb4 j k z LIBRARY ASSISTANT III GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: Performs full scope of responsibility in specific library functions including circulation and technical services; performs related work as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Works under the direction standards. hLibrarian who re views for the degree of maintenance of library and assignments may be provided by an Assistant Librarian. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: May supervise and direct daily work of employees assigned to section of responsibility. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPAL DUTIES: (Any single position of a class will not listed and many positions will involve usually involve all of the duties duties which are not listed.) 1. Assists the public in the use of the public library by giving standard information in person or by phone. 2. Explains the use of library facilities to new patrons, assisting in the use of card catalog. 3. Answers reference questions as required. 4. Arranges and organizes circulation desk for operation; checks library materials in rn out, standard rol procedures: s materials rata d followingelirarycorrect proceduresand damage arranges materials for reshelving. S. Supervises and works in unit of responsibility; reports major problems to supervisors; schedules community service workers and volunteers in unit. 6. Receives new materials, checking invoices and condition. 7. Catalogs new and replacement material in accordance with library t practice; prepares list cards and materials for shelving. 8. Organizes and prioritizes materials for processing and supervises completion of process. 9. Maintains records of materials added to collection including periodicals. 10. Participates in selection of materials to be added to collection. 11. Selects and prepares books for annual bindery shipment. 12. Maintains lists of voluntegrs:foc general and specific functions. 13. Prepares correspondence, reports and statistics as required. 1 LIBRARY ASSISTANT III Page Two 14. Maintains shelf list and public catalog of entire book, records and cassette collection. 15. Maintains records of and processes inter—library loan requests. 16. Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: Practices, principles and philosophy of modern library procedures; reference tools, book selection tools; library classification system, library procedures and techniques; books and literature, rules of descriptive cataloging; book mending; Dewey Decimal System. Ability To: Exercise good judgment in carrying out library policies and procedures; establish and maintain effective working relationships with subordinates, peers and supervisors; communicate effectively and deal tactfully with the public; understand and execute oral and written Instructions; train and supervise volunteer and paid subordinates, organize and prioritize workload for self and subordinates, operate standard office equipment; physically perform duties including banding, reaching and lifting; appropriately catalog and file within established system; perform duties of Library Assistant II classification. Sk „Il xn: operation of standard office equipment. € E AND TRAINING: High school graduation or equivalent and four years =p# office experience, at least one of which was in a library setting; or any -' satisfactory combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. sblO4/sb4 ass F d CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 3s_ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY —71 AGENDA OF: November 17, 1986AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: C.I.P. Status Report — October, 1986 PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woolev t� REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: Crl� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE A report on the status of the various projects in the CIP and LID programs. INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the monthly report on CIP projects as of October 30, 1986. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive information report; no formal action required. SUGGESTED ACTION Receive reports; no action required. (RRWbr2503P/31P) 5 Paige 1 a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT October 31, 1986 ST-1 - Resurfacing of Fairview Lane Fairview Court & 116th Place Completed. ST-2 -- Resurfacing of SW 68th Parkway Completed. ST-3 _North Dakota Street Resurfacing and Reconstruction (90th to 95th) This project is far behind schedule due to delays in relocating some existing utilities. However, the contractor has promised to begin the road construction on November 4th. If the weather holds, the project should be completed by mid-November. ST-4 SW 104th Avenue Reconstruction Construction is substantially completed. ST-5 - Commercial Street Connection This project has been postponed. ST-6 - Tiedeman Avenue Realignment Consultant working on final design. ST-7 - North Dakota Street Realignment at 115th Avenue Final design complete. Staff is working on right-of-way acquisition. Construction will need to be deferred until Spring. ST-8 - Realignment of 79th Avenue at Bonita Road This project is being constructed in conjunction with development of Mara Woods Subdivision. The subdivision plans have been approved. ST-9 - Main Street Improvement Study Project completed. ST-10 - Hunziker Street Realignment Study Project completed. ST 11 - Traffic Signal at Greenburg Road and Tiedeman Avenue To be designed by the State as a Federal Aid Project. City/State Agreement approved by the Council on November 3rd. ST-12 - Traffic Signal at Scholls Ferry Road and North Dakota Street Project completed. ST-13 - Traffic Signal at Burnham Street and Hall Blvd. Design is underway. ST-14 - Traffic Signal at Hall Blvd, and McDonald Street Design is underway. Page 2 ST 15 L.I.D. No 85-1. Nall Blvd Street Improvements Construction complete. We are compiling final costs for LID closout. ST-16 — L.I.D. No 35 S.W. 68th Parkway Construction complete. We are compiling final costs for LID closeout. ST-17 — L.I.D. No. 40 Dartmouth Street Extension Engineering design work is approximately 507 complete. Property appraisal reports for right—of-way are complete. ST 18 Pacific Highway and Canterbury Lane Intersection Improvement The State has scheduled this project for 1990 construction. (RRW:br2503P/31P) Page 3 SS-1 — Sewer Master Plan The master planning work will be scheduled for this winter. SS-2 — Pinebrook Sewer Trunkline Repairs We will be evaluating how to complete the repairs as soon as work load permits. SS--3 — SW 69th Avenue Sewer Extension Project completed. SS-4 — O.E.A. Trunk Access Paths The work has been delayed to better coordinate with private development in the area. SS-5 -- Watkins Avenue Sewer Reaair Project complete. SS-6 — 100th Avenue and Inez Street Sewer L.I.D. The LID was defeated. SS-7 — 74th Avenue and Cherry Drive Sewer L.I.D. The LID was defeated. SS-8 -- Elmhurst Sewer Extension Still working on acquiring the required easements. SS-9 — 89th P1. Sewer Report Scheduled for Spring, 1987 SS-10 ,— Industrial Area Sewer RR Crossing Scheduled for 1967. SS-11 — Sewer Capacity Upgrading Projects will be defined during the CIP update. (RRW:br2503P/31P) 5i- Page 4 SD-1 Gaarde Street and Canterbury Area Drainage Improvements Construction plans are complete. We are working on acquiring the necessary easements. SD-2 — Gentle Woods Channel Improvements Due to difficult access for construction equipment, we are re—evaluating the repairs to be done. SD-3 — 100th Avenue Storm Sewer (Murdock—Sattler Scheduled for 1907 if funding is adequate. SD-4 — Summerlake/Anton Park Drainage Construction plans are bung prepared and easements acquired. Construction schedule will depend on weather and easement acquisitions. PK-1 — Cook Park All work is complete except for irrigation and the pedestrian bridge to the float. The bridge is here but cannot be installed until the float is repaired. City crews will be installing irrigation in November. PK-2 — Woodard Park _. Project completed. PK-3 - Sugarcreek Trails This project has been delayed by weather and workload. It will be rescheduled. Other Projects 1. Sumer Lake irrigation is completed. (RRW-.br25o3P/31P) kl Rage 5 CIP/LID PROJECT STATUS As Of October 31, 1986 PROJECT STATUS ESTIMATED COMMENTS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE c 4 C c w a w u r M4 0 W Lf Lf 134 (a w $ � w UO It ST-1 - Fairview Resurface ,3�'< ; •�• .+,• Com leted ST-2 - SW 68th Parkway Resurfa •'�': '? Com leted ST-3 - No. Dakota Resurface S• 11/14/86 v ST-4 - 104th Ave. reconstruct Completed ,���, 5 - Commercial St. Connect. --- Project- ST-6 - Tiedeman Ave. Realign. :;.;.• 6/30/87 ST-7 - No. Dakota Realign. -- 6/30 87 Construction by ST-8 - 79th/Bonita Realign. Sri•.'• ' ? P-ivate Developer _ ST-9 - Main St. Improve. Study ,� Completed Prelim En r ST-10-• Hunziker Realign. Study Completed Prelim. En r ST-11- Greenburg/Tiedeman Sign •'� 6/30/87 ST-12- Scholls Fry/No Dak Sign Completed _--__.•----- S ST-13- Burnham/Hall Signal 12/31/87 �____•1.------- ST-14- Hall/McDonald Signal 12/31/87 ST-15- Hail LID #85-1 Completed— ST-16- SW 68th Parkway LID #35 Completed ___ .. •___..__ .__._.. . . ST-17- Dartmouth LID IF40 7/31/87 x-18- 99W/Canterbury improve. 1990 _.... �..___..--- - -..... .. . , CIP/LID PROJECT STATUS As Of October 31, 1986 PROJECT STATUS ESTIMATED COMMENTS PROJECT COMPLETION DATE c L C +� �' y y in U ,Ea .� a F +�+ ° s. 0 a N > y c SS-1 - Sewer Master Plan v 6/30/87 SS-3 - Pinebrook Trunk Repairs �; ? SS-3 - SW 69th Sewer Extension Com 1 ted ti SS-4 - OEA Trunk Access Paths SS-'S - Watkins Ave. Sewer Repa Cnm feted --- "S.,-6 - 100th/Ines Sewer LID 1,1p ated 71� Defeated SS-7 - 74th/Cherry Sewer LID - - IIID SS-8 - Elmhurst Sewer Extensio . ? c- - 89th P1. Sewer Repair 1987 — -10- Industrial Area RR Xing 1987 SS-11- capacity Ularadinq 1587 i � i ■ • ■�'J �ti xy �� .. _ .• tri . il.��•J`r r���i i e r♦ . i� J� l 1 ✓� - ilt�l�®i i /T —3 CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 17, 1986DATE SUBMITTED: November 5, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution PREVIOUS ACTION: Council approved Appropriating Conti enc urchase of vehicle October 13 1 6 EPREPARED BY: Wa ne Lowr ' DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE The City Council has determined that a police vehicle should be made available for use by the Chief of Police. INFORMATION SUMMARY ' At the City Council meeting of October 13, 1986, the City Council approved the purchase of a police vehicle to be funded through the appropriation of General x Fund Contingency. Contingency is to be appropriated as follows: From To Apgropriation Police Adm. Capital Outlay $11,000 121,596 $10,596 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. No action. 2. Adopt attached resolution. FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recossnends passage of attached resolution. ;' WL:can/145 r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 17, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 8, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appointment of PREVIOUS ACTION: Deputy City Recorder - Catherine Wheatley PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OKREQUESTED BY: Robert W._Jean POLICY ISSUE Should the function of City Recorder be continued during absences of the city Recorder (i.e. City business away from City Hall or personal leave time). INFORMATION SUMMARY Since the Council has appointed Loreen Wilson as Acting City Recorder there is currently no back up for the office of City Recorder should she be away from the City. Due to the size of the City and the amount of requests coming to the Recorder's office on a daily basis, staff would request a Deputy Recorder be appointed. Ms. Catherine Wheatlay has been serving as Recorder pro-tem over the last two months. At_TERNATYVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolution appointing Catherine Wheatley as Deputy 1 Recorder. 2. Take no action at time time. FISCAL IMPACT X/A SUGGESTED ACTIN Alternative number 1. 1w/4298A Yom,` R_.Z..; CITY OF TIGARD„, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: November 17, 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: November 13, 1986 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Council Approval PREVIOUS ACTION: to purchase 3 new patrol cars. PREPARED BY: Capt. Jennings DEPT HEAD OK ITY ADMIN OKREQUESTED BY: Chief Lehr POLICY ISSUE Contract Review approval required on expenditure over $15,000. INFORMATION SUMMARY State of Oregon Department of General Services awarded low bid of police vehicle package to Weiler Chevrolet in Oregon City. Single price per vehicle is $11,150. Capital outlay budget authority for new vehicles for FY 86/87 is $36,000. There is also a $100 service fee to the State and a charge of $24.00 for a Shop Service Manual. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED _. 1. Purchase 3 Chevrolets on State Bid. 2. Purchase 3 vehicles not within the required specifications at higher price not on State Bid. 3. No purchase of replacement vehicles. FISCAL IMPACT An expenditure of $33,574; less than the $36,000 budgeted authority. SUGGESTED ACTION 1._ Alternative No. 1 — Purchase the 3 1987 Chevrolets on State Bid. K } e,ec -' _ r -v - a4 z MEMORANDUM ` w CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor, Council & Ad 'nistr for November 14, 1986 FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Police Patrol Vehicle Specifications I have had conversations with several of you concerning the size of our police patrol vehicles. As you know the Department in the past has purchased Chevrolet Malibus, a mid—sized car. Those Malibus have served the department well. However, Chevrolet no longer manufactures the Malibu and has replaced it with the front wheel drive Celebrity. Ford Motor Company has replaced the LTD II with the front wheel drive Taurus and Chrysler has temporarily discontinued production of the Plymouth Gran FuryJDodga Diplomat. They will ` resume production of these vehicles in February, 1987, when American Motors Corporation will start making them for Chrysler. While a front wheel drive vehicle is adequate for general passenger use, it is not an appropriate vehicle for police patrol use. The front ends of front wheel drive vehicles are expensive to maintain, are subject to front and problems, and wear out tires at an accelerated rate. Most police agencies have avoided using front wheel drive vehicles for patrol vehicles. In the Michigan State Police tests the only front wheel drive vehicle tested was the Ford Taurus and it tested significantly poorer than the rear wheel drive vehicles. There may come a time when only front wheel drive vehicles are manufactured but until then few agencies will be willing to put them into a patrol fleet. Until now I have been reluctant to purchase full size vehicles, preferring mit!-size vehicles because of purchase price and operating cost efficiencies. However, it now appears that we have only the full size Crown Victorias and the full size Chevrolet Impala Caprices to choose from. They are comparable in price. The Chevrolet Impalas tested N1 in the Michigan State Police tests, Chevrolet was also the winner of the State Police bid. It is therefore my recommendation that we purchase the Impalas through the State Police bid. We can expect 90 to 120 days delivery. OL:bs223 IA CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON p� „} RESOLUTION NO. 86-/�. O A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN EXECUTIVE SERVICE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH Jill Monlev Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer. WHEREAS, the City wishes to assure certain protections for City officer and department head positions in regard to possible termination as at will employees serving at the pleasure of the appointing authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1: This Employment Agreement (attached Exhibit "A") be entered into with Jill Monlev Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer. This Agreement will take effect December 22, 1986__ PASSED: This 17th day of November 1986. 4 Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: l v 5 City Recorder — City of Tigard RWJ:1w/4147A/0028A RESOLUTION NO. 86— EXHIBIT "A" — RESOLUTION N0. 86— AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT { THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 17th day of November 1986 by and betmeen the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Jill Monley , Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer, hereinafter referred to as "EMPLOYEE". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the CITY has offered and the EMPLOYEE accepts this appointment as at will serving at the pleasure of the appointing authority; and, WHEREAS, CITY and EMPLOYEE desire a written agreement creating a professional and businesslike relationship, serving as a basis for effective communication and to avoid misunderstanding; and, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained and for consideration herein specified, the CITY and EMPLOYEE mutually agree: SECTION 1 — EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND AUTHORITY: The CITY has agreed to employ Jill Monley as Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer consistent with state law, City Charter, ordinance, resolution, administrative procedures and described in EMPLOYEE'S job description (Exhibit "B"). The EMPLOYEE agrees to accept said employment serving at will at the pleasure of the City Administrator, with Mayor and Council Consent, as the appointing authority. SECTION 2 — TERM: ( The term of this agreement shall be indefinite. Vothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the CITY to terminate the services of EMPLOYEE at any time, subject only to the provisions set forth in this Agreement, nor nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the EMPLOYEE to resign at any time from his/her position with the CITY, subject only to the provisions set forth in this Agreement. SECTION 3 — TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE: ,4J- R G „� � � • �"` -- A. Te ination At dill Not For Cause. This Tigre nt may be terminated by either the CITY or EMPLOYEE for any reason whatsoever upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notice to the other party,,e,4 Nothing shall restrict the CITY'S right to give notice and immediately suspend with payP OYEE 73t,from his/her duties. B. Termination For Cause. In the event of a For Cause termination, this Agreement shall not be deemed to construe any waiver of rights or remedy available to any employee. This Agreement may be terminated by the CITY in writing immediately For Cause at the sole discretion of the CITY if EMPLOYEE shall be found unfit for the position per Federal, State or City rules and regulations applicable to employees in a For Cause tenwination. toLa C. Severance Applicability. In the event EMPLOYEE is involuntarily terminated At Will Not For CausrG �y� . CITY or voluntarily resigns following a written request from the appointing authority that he/stw resign during such time as the EMPLOYEE is milling and able to perform the assigned duties, then in that event the CM agrees to pay EMPLOYEE, or continue to employ EMPLOYEE fo a ike time following the 30 day written notice period, a lump sum severance payment equal to �� following the 30 day notice Severance pay shall be at the EMPLOYEE's highest rate of monthly base salary during his/her term of City employment. However, if EMPLOY is terminated For Cause or convicted of any illegal act involving personal gain to hiaVher, then CITY shall have no obligation to pay the severance pay. D. If the CITY reduces the salary or other financial benefits of EMPLOYEE in a greater percentage than an applicable across-the-board reduction for all unclassified employees of the City, or if the CITY refuses following written notice requesting compliance with any other provision benefiting EMPLOYEE herein, then the EMPLOYEE may, at his/her option, deem the Agreement to be involuntarily terminated without cause at the date of such reduction or refusal to comply with the meaning and context of this Agreement, and the severance pay provision of this section shall apply. E. If EMPLOYEE voluntarily resigns his/her position with the CITY by giving the CITY at least thirty days written notice in advance, then EMPLOYEE shall be deemed to have resigned in good standing. Termination or resignation in good standing shall entitle EMPLOYEE to a lump sun payment equivalent to all accrued vacation and other entitlement benefits, except that in no event will these benefits exceed similar benefits accorded other unclassified employees. SECTION 4 - SALARY, VACATION, AND OTHER BENEFITS: A. Salary. The CITY agrees to pay the EMPLOYEE for his/her services in an amount as determined by City Council on a Median Market Total Compensation basis for similar positions throughout the Tri-county area, reported and payable in the same installments and in the sane manner as other employees are paid. There may be performance evaluations as often as the CITY deems appropriate and as provided in this Agreement. There shall be a merit pay increase review annually. Apart from any merit pay increases, the CITY agrees to compensate the EMPLOYEE with an annual increase for coat-of-living within pay range at least in the same percentage and canner as awarded to the unclassified employees of the CITY. EMPLOYEE shall be paid $3,330/month ($39,960 annual equivalent) effective December 22, 1986. D. Hours Of Mork. Because EMPLOYEE will devote a great deal of time outside normal work periods or office fours to City duties, EMPLOYEE'S work week shall be a flexible work week. The City Administrator at his/her sole discretion may allow a reasonable amount of "like time" off in consideration for time / worked beyond a normal work period. Any "like time" off granted by the City Administrator shaQj not be// an accrued benefit. Salary shall be considered full compensation for the sits Tfulil [C. Vacation. The CITY recognises that EMPLOYEE had education and experience equivalent to years employment with theY as of the dat of this appointment. EMPLOYEE shall therefore accrue vacation at no less than days per year hours/month), and shall henceforth accrue vacation at a higher rate equivalent to other unclassified employees based on an equivalent December 22, 1426 effective date of appointment. �98� D. Other Benefits. CITY agrees to provide EMPLOYEE the same premium benefit allowances paid by City for other unclassified positions of the City and to allow EMPLOYEE to allocate any unused benefit allowances into a deferred compensation program designated by EMPLOYEE. SECTION 5 - ANNUAL GOAL-SETTING AMD PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: The City Administrator shall encourage the Mayor and individual members of the Council to periodically identify their comments about the Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer functions of the City. The City Administrator shall Beet at least annually with the EMPLOYEE to evaluate and assess the performance of the EMPLOYEE in meeting or progressing towards the goals adopted by Council and directed by City Administrator. These annual evaluations shall be conducted by the City Administrator, unless City Council requests to participate in the evaluation. If City Council requests participation, or the EMPLOYEE requests City Council participation, then the evaluation shall be in closed Executive Session. In the event the City Administrator determines that the performance of the EMPLOYEE is unsatisfactory in any respect or needs significant improvement in any area, the City Administrator shall describe these concerns in writing and in reasonable detail or with specific examples so as to be objective and positive in nature. The EMPLOYEE has the right to request an audience with the City Council to discuss L th:se written concerns. The opportunity for performance review shall not be construed in any way as granting a for cause or due process right. SECTION 6 - GENERAL PROVISIONS: ` A. Professional Liability. The CITY agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the EMPLOYEE from �. any and all demands, claims, suits, actions and legal proceedings brought against EMPLOYEE in ;pis/her individual capacity, or in her official capacity as EMPLOYEE of the CITY, if EMPLOYEE was acting within the scope of his/her employment. The CITY agrees to pay premiums on appropriate insurance policies through the CITY'S normal insurance program. B. Other Terms and Conditions of employment may be determined by the CITY relating to the duties and performance of the EMPLOYEE provided that such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the City Charter or any other law. clothing shall restrict the ability of the CITY and EMPLOYEE to mutually and in writing amend or adjust the terms of this Agreement. EMPLOYEE reserves the right to discuss the terms or termination of this Agreement with the City Council as a whole in either closed Executive Session or open Regular Session as state law allows and as the EMPLOYEE dorms appropriate. C. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this Agreement, the EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to receive the same !clary, compensation, vacation, sick leave and other benefits as accorded any other unclassified City euployee, including provisions governing accrual and payment therefore on termination of employment. All provisions of the City Charter and other City programs relating to employee benefits aril working conditions as they now exist or as amended, shall also apply to the EMPLOYEE as to other unclassified employees and are in addition to any benefits to the EMPLOYEE specifically identified in this agreement. D. Professional Development. The CITY encourages the professional growth and development of the EMPLOYEE. The CITY shall permit a reasonable amount of time for EMPLOYEE to attend and the CITY shall pay for the direct costs necessary for travel, subsistence and registration as approved by the annual / budget. { E. The EMPLOYEE is required to maintain residence within the Tri-county area in accordance with City Code rtquirements. F. The text herein shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties and any oral or other understandings are not binding upon the parties, unless specifically amended in writing by mutual agreement. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the heirs at law and executors of EMPLOYEE. This Agreement shall became effective as of December 22, 1986 G. Se%Yrability. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or portion thereof shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed and the EMPLOYEE has signed and executed this Agreement, both in duplicate, the day and year first above written. Mayor - City of Tigard '" Employee ATTEST - City Administrator (RW:lw/4147A/0028A) EXHIBIT "B" COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR GENERAL STATEMENTOF DUTIES: An executive service level position as Community Services Department Head and as Assistant City Administrative Officer. Administers the divisions of Finance and Accounting, and Support Service /City Recorder. Directly supervises the City's personnel/labor relations, purchasing, insurance/risk management, and community/public relations programs. Serves as an Officer of the City as Assistant City Administrator and acts as City Administrator in his absence when designated or on city—wide projects as assigned. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: An executive service level position appointed and removed at will by the City Administrator as appointing authority with consent of Council. Works under general direction of City Administrator who periodically reviews activities for goals achieved and results obtained. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Provides general supervision and direction to the City Recorder/3upport Services Manager, and the Finance Director. Directly supervises the Assistant Director/Personnel Director/Purchasing Agent, Community Administrative Assistant, and the department's confidential Executive Secretary. Acts as City Administrator in his absence or as designated. EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPLE DUTIES: (Any single position of a classification will not necessarily involve all of the duties listed, and many positions will involve duties which are not listed.) _ 1. Interprets and implements City Council and city management policies regarding finance, accounting, personnel/labor relations, purchasing/contracting, insurance/risk management, community service/public relations, and related support services, within scope of responsibility/accountability designated. z 2. Delegates responsibilities to division managers and other subordinates and exercises full scope of supervisory duties, including setting and reviewing performance goals, etc. 3. Initiates and develops departmental policies and goals, seeking administrative or policy—making approval as needed; administers approved policies and plans; reviews and revises procedures and plans as needed for optimum performance. 4. Prepares department budget for Administrator/Council approval; administers and monitors approved budget. 5. Represents the department before the City Council, necessary boards and commissions, and a variety of intergovernmental organizations, as well as the general public. Represents the City Administrator in his absence or as designated. 6. Manages interdivisional conflict and coordination. Coordinates work with other departments. T. Drafts a variety of correspondence, reports, etc. , for City Council and others as required. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR Page Two �. 8. Participates in a variety of city organizational meetings on a periodic basis in conjunction with assigned responsibilities. 9. Performs variety of regular management activities such as overseeing recruitment, selection and training of personnel supervised, conducting periodic performance/progress reviews, goals setting meetings, personnel evaluation/follow-up, verifying payroll records, approving requests for leave or training, and like matters. 10. Performs related duties and assumes additional responsibilities as needs of the City dictate, including but not limited to: Board and Committee Support. Public Information and Community Relations, Employee Relations, and Special Projects. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge Of: General accounting, budgeting, and related fiscal matters, or personnel/labor relations, and sound management principles and practices. Thorough knowledge in one or more of areas supervised. Ability To: Plan, direct, and administer the divisions of Finance/Accounting, City Recorder/Support Services, as well as the functions of personnel/labor relations, purchasing, insurance/risk management, public/community services, and related. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with subordinates, peers,ciWyel�ff�gidiversembers of citizen boards and Develop ideas tend her management staff, as express them orally and in writing, including making effective presentations at public meetings. Skill Communication, application of knowledge and skill to areas supervised, budget preparation and fiscal administration, Pers onnel management/labor relations, and modern management principles and practices. Specialized skill in interpersonal relations, conflict resolution, and "team" building. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Master's degree in Public Personnel, Business Administration or related field — or equivalent combination of education, training and experience, plus eight years of progressively-more-responsible public service administrative experience, including at least three years at the senior manager level. Requires general familiarity or experience with personnel/labor relations, public sector contracting, purchasing, insurance, risk procedures, with considerable expertise in one oar moreaofdfiscal the areas supervised• SPECIAL REQUIREMENT: Incumbent in this position serves "at will" of City Administrator and may be released from employment without cause. An Executive Service At Will Employment Agreement will be offered by the City. Incumbent must establish and mah wand Mashing of n Countiesintain permant eof thency tstate hin hof Oregon i es of Clackamas, Multnomah, , nine months of appointment. Val:d driver's license or ability to obtain one within 30 days of appointment. sb1O6/sb5 EXHIBIT "A" — RESOLUTION NO. 86r- AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEt*W THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this 17th day of November 1486 by and betBeen the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Jill Morley , Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer, hereinafter referred to as "EMPLOYEE". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the CITY has offered and the EMPLOYEE accepts this appointment as at will serving at the pleasure of the appointing authority; and, 1 WHEREAS, CITY and EMPLOYEE desire a written agreement creating a professional and businesslike relationship, sewing as a basis for effective communication and to avoid misunderstanding; and. THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants herein contained and for consideration herein specified, ttm CITY and EMPLOYEE mutually agree: SECTION 1 — EMPLOYMENT, DUTIES AND AUTHORITY: The CITY has agreed to employ Jill Monl*V as Community Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer consistent with state law, City Charter, ordinance, resolution, administrative procedures and described in EMPLOYEE'S job description (Exhibit -B-). The EMPLOYEE agrees to accept said employment serving at will at the pleasure of the City Administrator, with Mayor and Council Consent, as the appointing authority. SECTION 2 — TERM: The tors of this agreement shall be indefinite. Vothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the CITY to torsinato the services of EMPLOYEE at any time, subject onl•; to the provisions set forth in this Agreement, nor nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the EMPLOYEE to resign at any time from his/her position with the CITY, subject only to the provisisolns_ set forth in this Agreement. A SECTION 3 — TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE: QXA. A. Termination At dill Not For Cause. A may be torrinated by e t t{ tlf8 C_ I or LOY� for any reason whatsoever upon the giving of thirty (30) days written notice to the other part Nothing shall restrict the CITY'S right to give notice and immediately suspend with pay the EMPLOYE from his/her duties. S. Termination For Cause. In the event of a For Cause termination, this Agreement shall not be doomed to construe any waiver of rights or remedy available to any employee. This Agreement may be terminated by the CITY in writing immediately For Cause at the sole discretion of the CITY if EMPLOYEE shall be found unfit for the position per Federal, State or City rules and regulations applicable to employees in a For Cause termination. C. Seversoce Applicability. In the event EMPLOYEE is involuntarily to noted At Will Not For Causekby CITY or voluntarily resigns following a written request from the appointing authority that he/che resign during such time as the EMPLOYEE is Billing and able to perform the assigned duties, then in that event the CITY agrees to pay EMPLOYEE, or continue to employ EMPLOYEE for a like time foliawing the 30 day written notice period, a lump sum severance paymentRermio�f "pay following the 30 day notice t e ranee pay shall be at the EMPLOYEE's highest rate of monthly base salary during his/her ty employment. However, if EMPLOYEE is r' terminated For Cause or convicted of any illegal act involvi personal gain to him/her, then CITY shall have no obligation to pay the severance pay. D. If the CITY reduces the salary or other financial benefits of EMPLOYEE in a greater percentage than _ an applicable across-the-board reduction for all unclassified employees of the City, or if the CITY (� refuses follaring written notice requesting compliance with any other provision benefiting EMPLOYEE herein, then the EMPLOYEE may, at his/her option, deem the Agreement to be involuntarily terminated without cause at the date of such reduction or refusal to comply with the meaning and context of this Agreement, and the severance pay provision of this section shall apply. E. If EMPLOYEE voluntarily resigns his/her position with the CITY by giving the CITY at least thirty days written notice in advance, then EMPLOYEE shall be deemed to have resigned in good standing. Termination or resignation in good standing shall entitle EMPLOYEE to a lump sup payment equivalent to all accrued vacation and other entitlement benefits, except that in no event will these benefits exceed siwilaT benefits accorded other unclassified employees. SECTION 4 - SALARY, VACATION, AMD OTHER BENEFITS: A. Salary. The CITY agrees to pay the EMPLOYEE for his/her services in an amount as determined by City Council on a Median Market Total Compensation basis for similar positions throughout the Tri-county area, reported acm! payable in the same installments and in the same wanner as other employees are paid. There may be performance evaluations as often as the CITY deems appropriate and as provided in this Agreement. There shall be a merit pay increase review annually. Apart from any merit pay increases, the CITY agre*s to compensate the EMPLOYEE with an annual increase for cost-of-living within pay range at least in the same percentage and manner as awarded to the unclassified employees of the CITY. EMPLOYEE shall be paid =3,330/month (=39,960 annual equivalent) effective December 22, 1986. B. Hours Of Rork. Because EMPLOYEE will devote a great deal of time outside normal work periods or office hours to City duties, EMPLOYEE'S work week shall be a flexible work week. The City Administrator at his/her sale discretion may allow a reasonable amount at "�ike�l t " of in consideration for time worked beyond a normal work period. Any "like time" off grant:i;4y�lhe CitO Administrator shall not ba ( an accrued benefit/ Salary shAll be considere4 full compensation for the position. e tips,POW4L 404 CN We S.,K► aK. �� C. Vacation. The CITY recognizes that EMPLOYEE had education and experience equivalent to 417full• years esnploywent with the CITY as of the dad this appointment. EMPLOYEE shall therefore accrue vacation at not less than days per year hours/month), and shall henceforth accrue vacation at a higher rate equivalent to--other unclassified employees based on an equivalent Decesber 22, 19T6 effective date of appointment. fill D. Other Benefits. CITY agrees to provide EMPLOYEE the same premium benefit allowances paid by City for other unclassified positions of the City and to allow EMPLOYEE to allocate any unused benefit allowances into a deferred compensation program designated by EMPLOYEE. SECTION S - R"JAL GOAL-SETTING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: The City Administrator shall encourage the Mayor and individual members of the Council to periodically identify their comments about the Comanunity Services Director/Assistant City Administrative Officer/Acting Finance Officer functions of the City. The City Administrator shall meet at least annually with the EMPLOYEE to evaluate and assess the performance of the EMPLOYEE in meeting or progressing .tomards the goals adopted by Council and directed by City Administrator. These annual *valuations Ahall be conducted by the City Administrator, unless City Council requests to participate in the evaluation. If City Council requests participation, or the EMPLOYEE requests City Council participation, then the evaluation shall be in closed Executive Session. In the event the City Administrator determines that the performance of the EMPLOYEE is unsatisfactory in any respect or needs significant improvement in any area, the City Administrator shall describe these concerns in writing and in reasonable detail or with specific examples so as to be objective and positive in nature. The EMPLOYEE has the right to request an audience with the City Council to discuss these aritten concerns. The opportunity for performance revieo shall not be construed in any way as granting a for cause or due process right. . ...... . .. . r SECTION 6 - GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Professional Liability. The CITY agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the EVLOYEE from any and all demands, claims, suits, actions and legal proceedings brought against EMPLOYEE in his/her individual capacity, or in her official capacity as EMPLOYEE of the CITY, if EyPLOYEE was acting within the scope of his/her employment. The CITY agrees to pay premiums on appropriate insurance policies through the CITY'S normal insurance program. B. Other Terms and Conditions of employment may be determined by the CITY relating to the duties and performance of the EMPLOYEE provided that such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the City Charter or any other law. Vothing shall restrict the ability of the 491TY and EMPLOYEE to mutually and in writing amend or adjust the torus of this Agreement. EMPLOYEE reserves the right to discuss the terms or termination of this Agreement with the City Council as a whole in either closed Executive Session or open Regular Session as state law allows and as the FMLOYEE deems appropriate. t C. Except as otherwise specifically provided by this Agreement, the EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to receive the same salary, compensation, vacation, sick leave and other benefits as accorded any other j unclassified City employee, including provisions governing accrual and payment therefore on termination ! of employment. All provisions of the City Charter and other City programs relating to employee benefits and corking conditions as they now exist or s amended, shall also apply to the EMPLOYEE as to other unclassified employees and are in addition to any benefits to the EMPLOYEE specifically identified in this agreement. 0. Professional Development. The CITY encourages the professional growth and development of the EMPLOYEE. The CITY shall permit a reasonable amount of time for EMPLOYEE to attend and the CITY shall pay for the direct costs necessary for travel. subsistence and registration as approved by the annual budget. E. The EMPLOYEE is required to maintain residence within the Tri--county area in accordance with City Code requirements. r; F. filar text heroin shall constitute the entire Agreement bet*een the parties and any oral or other undermturdirgs are not binding upon the parties, unless specifically amended in writing by mutual agreement. This Agreimeet shill be binding and inure to the benefit of the heirs at law and executora of EMPLOYEE. This Agreement shall become effective as of December-22, 1986 G. Severability, it any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid or unenfo-ceable, the remainder of this Agreement or portion thereof shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect. IN VMS S WHERWF, the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed and the EMPLOYEE has signed and executed this Agreement, both in duplicate, the day and year first above written. Mayor — City i►f Tigard — Employee ATTEST — City Administrator (RM7:Lw/4147ft/00 t3) x � a `gig _ «, .