Loading...
City Council Packet - 07/28/1986 8. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. f Motion to: 8.1 Approve Council Minutes -• Jul,y 16, 1986 8.2 Receive and File: a Community Development Land Use Decisions b Fiscal Year 86-87 Work Plans c Departmental Monthly Reports 8.3 Adopt Findings - Irvington Moore Temporary Use 9-86 - Res.N 86-- 8.4 Amending Findings - Graymore SDR - Resolution No. 86-IN 8.5 Approve Surd and Committee Appointments: a Resolution No. 86-85 - Transportation Committee 8.6 Approve Intergovermental Agreement With Washington County For County's Transportation Plan Update 8.7 Approve Delinquent Bancroft Alternatives 8.8 Approve City Administrator's Review Criterion For Special Meeting of 8/4/86. 8.9 Approve Call For Public Nearing On 9/8!86 - Kneeland Estates Utility/Roadway Easement Vacation 1ObS . I.A.—8G-4sFa 8.10 Approve Appointments of Acting City Recorder & Finance Officer 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council willgo into Executive e Session under the provisions of QRS 192.660 (1) (d) (h) ts labor relations and current/pending litigation issues. 11. ADJOURNME=NT 1w/3939A z k PAGE 2 COUAZIL AGENDA - JULY 28, 1986 - T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L • REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JULY 28, 1986 - 7:00 P.M. t 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian, Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David C. Lehr, Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Steve Crew, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Acting City Recorder; Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR MOUE-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator requested the following items be considered under Non-Agenda Items: .1 Jack Park Options .2 American Legion OLCC Application .3 Cotswald Subdivision Bond Release .4 Public Information Announcements b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Johnson to amend agenda as requested. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA - No one appeared to speak. 4. PU9LIC HEARING - ZONE AORMMUE AMENDMENT N-" - MECMM REVIEW PROCESS / A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 18.32.310 (a) and (b) _ of the Tigard Municipal Code deleting the requirement that the Council or Planning Commission call up for review decisions made by other Approval Authorities by resolution. This amendment would allow the Council or Commission to call up for review decisions made by other Approval Authorities by motion only. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Community Development Director stated this amendment would allow the Council or Planning Commission to call up for review decisions made by other Approval Authorities by motion instead of resolution. C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. d. Community Development Director recommended approval. e. Public Hearing Closed f. ORDINANCE NO. 86-38 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.32.310 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (ZOA 3-96) g. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page`1 COUNCIL tn%V ES - JULY 28, 1986 �y 5, FRONTIER MARKET/RANDALL REQUEST FOR LAND SWAP a. Community Development Director explained the history of this issue and stated the eSti lanon for Council res d for floodplainoland olve is whether the City should trade dry b. After lengthy discussion, Councilor Brian stated he did not feel it prudent to trade dry property for floodplain and is reluctant to sell the property when future needs are not known. C. Consensus of Council was to have staff research the recent conditional use conditions to identify the amount of land in the floodplain proposed to be swapped and request Legal Counsel to determine the status of the easement in question. This will be at discussedthe that ted s they would 10, 1986 meeting. willing Randal to assist in representative gathering the information Council requested. 6. SMER-TWEL CABLE FRANCHISE SALE a• City Administrator stated the MACC Board directed a study group to check Tidal as to their legal, technical and financial capability to follow the terms and conditions of the agreement. He recommended on behalf of the Cable Study Commission and as City AdmHe stsated that Tiideltor to eishnotale of n the the businesscable franchise Tidal. ofinstalling line but more attuned to customer service. b. RESOLUTION NO. 86=,61 A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE AGREEMENT To TIDEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FROM STORER METRO COCM9UNICATIONS, INC' d by Councilor ards to C. MotionbwCouncilor aamendment to Section Bea to read $100,000wsecurity app fund amount. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. CHERRY MEET AT 74TH AVENUE LID - a. City Engineer noted history of studies and stated the area of the LID had been reduced with each study. The proposed LID now includes 6 lots or parcels of lots. He recommended Council peas the resolution to call fora public icearinc theirugoncerns ust 11, lon to give citizens the opportunity toex LID area. b. Council spoke to concerns about the size of the LID and whether there were any alternatives available to the property owners whose septic systems are failing other than the LID. C. RESOLUTION 80. 86-82 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENT TO FORMA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA OF SW 74TH AND CHERRY AND TO HOLD A Ci7- PUBLIC HEARING, ADOPTING THE CITY ENGINEER'S SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF THE HEARING BE GIVEN. . Page ;2 - COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 28, 1986 d. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. �• Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. e. Mr. Tony Maksym, owner of tax map 2S1 10C, tax lot 4001, expressed his concern with the legality of the reduced size of the LID compared to the petition originally signed. He also requested that Council direct the City Engineer to resolve the ground water problems prior to forming an L.ID. f. Council directed staff to address the financial and engineering feasibility at the public hearing on the 11th and to further discuss what other options are available to property owners if the LID were not formed. RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 7:51 PM 8. CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING 8.1 ROLL CALL: Present: Board Chairman John Cook; Board Members: Tom Brian, Carolyn Eadon, Jerry Edwards, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; David C. Lehr, Chief of Police; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Steve Crew, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Acting City Recorder; Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 8.2 AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: a. City Engineer requested approval to advertise for bids for the reconstruction of SW North Dakota Street between 90th and 35th Avenues. He stated this project had been identified in the Capital Improvement Program. b. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Edwards to authorize advertisement for bids. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 8.3 CLARIFICATION OF BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR FORMAL CONTRACTS a. City Engineer requested Council clarification as to whether Council approval is required prior to advertising for bids on projects under :15,000 that have been identified during the City Budget process. City Administrator stated the Council sees the quarterly Capital Outlay report from the City Engineer and also discusses the items during the City Budget process. b. After lengthy discussion, Council consensus was to allow staff to advertise for bids without additional Council review when the item is included in an approved budget or the CIP quarterly report update. Staff will prepare necessary paperwork for clarifying this section of the purchasing rules. 8.4 ADJOURNMENT: 8:05 PM Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES — JULY 28, 1996 RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: 8:05 PM , - 9. CONSENT QUA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 9.1 Approve Council Minutes - July 16, 1986 9.2 Receive and File: a Community Development Land Use Decisions b Fiscal Year 86-87 Work Plans c Departmental Monthly Reports 9.3 Adopt Findings - Irvington Moore Temporary Use 9-86 - Res.# 86-83 9.4 Amending Findings - Graymore SDR - Resolution No. 86-84 9.5 Approve Transportation Committee Appointment - Res. No. 86-85 9.6 Approve Intergovermental Agreement With Washington County For County's Transportation Plan Update 9.7 Approve Delinquent Bancroft Alternatives 9.8 Approve City Administrator's Review Criterion For Special Meeting of 8/4/86. 9.9 Approve Call For Public Nearing On 9/8/86 - Kneeland Estates Utility/Roadway Easement Vacation 46--74 9.10 Approve Appointments of Acting City Recorder 6 Finance Officer a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10.1 Jack Park Options a. Comawnity Development Director stated that staff has done some research into the options available to the City for addressing the concerns regarding the restrooms at lack Park. Staff may be able to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms or the restrooms could be restored. He requested Council direction. b. Consensus of Council was to have staff study options and report back. Councilor Edwards requested the Council discuss the options with the Park Board at that time. 10.2 American Legion OLCC Application a. Acting Recorder requested Council approval for the American Legion OLCC Application for a one day permit at Cook Park on August 17, 1986. b. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 4 COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 28, 1996 10.3 Cotswald Subdivision Bond Release a. Community Development Director requested Council approval of a resolution to conditionally accept the improvements within Cotswald No. 2 Subdivision and authorize the release of the original performance bond. b. RESOLUTION NO. 86-87 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS COTSWALD NO. 2 SUBDIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF THE ORIGINAL PERFORMANCE BOND. C. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Eadon to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10.4 Public Information Announcements a. City Administrator noted that the Japanese American Institute would be meeting at noon on 7/29/86 and Councilor Brian would represent Council. The Pacific American Institute would meet on 8/4/86 at 6FM and Mayor, Cook would be present. 11. EXECUTIVE The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 8:26 PM under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) & (h) to discuss labor relations and current/pending litigation issues. 12. ADJ+OUilNT: 9:40 PM r cting Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST: or —City of�Tiqa�rd �­ LW/4004A Page' 5 — C•OUNCIL MINUTES —JULY 28, 1996 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6789 i P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)881-0380 Nobe BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advactlaing #C i t y of Tigard e ❑ Tearsheet Notice P.O. Box 23397 *Tigard, OR 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREtiON. -t COUI+ITY OF WABimmiGTQN, ass. i, st+gyphania Neubauer tt being first duly sworn. depose and say that 1 am the Advartisil f F Director.orhiscleric.of tiw '-i gars Timea +� nerv�par of general circulation as-Optined M ORS 103.010 m and 193.020.polished at 8 ar d in Na aforesaid county and state;that the 1iti r1clinril Reg+llsr mpp -ing N+ic•e a pilled copy of which is hent*annexed,was published in the entire!seri of said newspaper for ], successive and consecutive in the following issues: July 24, _1986 8nbaorlbad> rcd efafe ms ttds July 24, 1986 j - Notary Pcrbfic for Oregon WFoil 9/20/88 VIT rJill CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed CITY OF TIGARD ORDINANCE NO. 86-38 STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) • I ""� `�► �CWL �"�c-T being first duly sworn, on . T_ = r oath, depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 86-38 which were adopted at the Council Meet -- g dated u Y Z0, 1�000 copy(s) of said ord nance(s) bei hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the qvirA. day of 1987. 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this ._Agt�� day of %7 1941 ARC-HA lac NT K. 4Notary Public for Oregon U NOTARY PUBLIC -- OREGON My Commission Expires: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86-OJT i" AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.32.310 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE.(ZOA 3-86) WHEREAS, Section 18.32.310 of the Community Development Code allows the City Council and Planning Commission, on its own motion, to hear any land use action approved by another approval authority by a resolution filed within 10 days of the publication of the notice; and WHEREAS, the resolution requirement poses problems if a resolution has not been prepared in advance; and WHEREAS, the Planning staff has recommended to the Planning Commission that the motion for review by Council or Planning Commission be approvable by voice vote; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed staff's recommendation at a public hearing on July S. 1986 and voted unanimously to recommend to City Council that Section 18.32.310 of the Community Development Code be amended; and On July 28, 1986 the City Council held a public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 18.32.310 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended as =' follows. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is shown in [brackets]. ny4W (a)(2) The Commission or Council, on its own motion, Seeks to hear the matter by [a resolution filed] voice vote within 14 days of the publication of the notice as provided by 18.32.240(a). (2) The Council or Commission, on its own motion, seeks review by [resolution filed] voice vote within 10 days of the final decision; or Section 2: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By S,.t_nrjjmaeas vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this g28'rh day of -,T,$ L4 1986. 11 or-en R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This day of :J-ZLIW 1986. EAN:sbld j 43 i,/r . Cook, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. ,86,q,? Page 1 ' AGENDA ITEh1 !/ 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE 7/28/86_ (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. please contact the City Administrator prior to the startof the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED � J -Rc WT x DATE 7/28/86 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) # Item Description: $ 3 - PVBLICHEARTNr_ - ZQNE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-86 - DECISION REVIEW PROCESS Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation OFF ICE'USE ONLY NOTICE OF PROPOSED ACTION LCDC FILE i TO: DEPARTMENT OF LANG CONSaYATIOy & OEYELOPME'iT 1175 Court Street N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 Action: (Check all that applyl . Land Use mew Land Use Comprehensive 9 Plan Amendment xx Regulation Amendment Regulation DATE: JUNE 3, 198833 (City or County) FROM. _ LOCAL FI DATE SET FOR FINAL HEARING ON ADOPTION: July 213 1986 inal(Note; Notice must be received in Salem at when filed at OLCDeDecause p�ovisionstfor� coRn►entshareitged This date must be provide j.V the date of final hearing). TIME AND PLACE FOR HERRING: 7:.00 Tigard Town Sall Room 13125 SW -tall Blvd. Ti and OR 97223 (1) SU144ARY AND PURPOSE OF PROPOSED ACTION: A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 16.32.310 (a) and (b) of the 'Tigard Municipal Code deleting the requirement that the Council val r Pla ninritiesby commission call up for review decisions made by other resolution. This amendment would allow the Council or Commission to call up for review decisions mane by other Approval Authorities by motion only. a. Size of Affected Ane: city-Wide iley- 1 e b. ocati on o A ec'..ea Area: (R) List Statewide Goals which may cooly to the pr000sal: 3) last an state 0r federal a encs es. local overrment Orre10�1 soeci ai service ( districts whlcn may a nterested nor maacte Y p Direct questions and comments to: slizabeth Newton (Phone) 503-639-9171 Address: 13125 Sw 11all Blvd. � ar OR 9 223 4 y � { L jjS OF t s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ZOA 3-86 Amendment to Section 18.32.310 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton REQUESTED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: tkl 01 CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council amend the Community Development Code to allu�r the Council or Planning Commission to call up for review any decision made by another approval authority by motion. INFORMATION SUMMARY Currently Section 18.32.310(a)(2) and 18.32.310(b)(2) requires the City Council or Planning Commission to adopt a resolution to call up for review any decision made by another Approval Authority. The resolution must be adopted within the ten day appeal period setforth on the decision. This requirement poses problems should the Council or Commission wish to call up a decision for review at a public meeting if a resolution has not been prepared. Staff - believes that this situation can be improved by amending the Code to allow the City Council and Planning Commission to call up for review any decision made by another Approval Authority by motion. Staff recommended to the Planning Commission at their July 8, 1986 meeting that Section 18.32.310 be amended to allow the City Council and planning Commission to call decisions made by other Approval Authorities up for review by motion. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward staff's recommendation to the Council. An ordinance is attached which if approved would adopt the modifications as recommended by the Planning Commission. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached ordinance adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation to modify Section 18.32.310 of the Community Development Code. 2. Do not approve the attached ordinance. 7 _ SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the attached ordinance adopting the Planning Comimission's .` recommendation to modify Section 18.32.310 of the Community Development Code. 4 EANsb/dj43 t. f (b) In computing the length of the petition for review period. the t day that notice of the decision is mailed shall be excluded and the last day for filing the petition or review shall be included unless the last day fails on a legal holiday for the CiLy or .,n a Saturday, in which case, the last day shall be the next business day. (c) lite Director may grant an extension of the appeal period un a Director's decision for a reasonable time only if requested by the applicant and in the condition where no appea] has beets field to that date. 18.32.310 Decisions which may be Appealed or Reviewed (a) Any decision by thra Director, made pursuaril. to Section 18.32.090(a) may be appealed to the appropriate approval authority as provided in Section 18.32. 110 and the approval author4 ty's dec is ion shal 1 be f incl . An appeal %hall be t.+ker, by (1) The filing of a Notice to Appeal as provided by 18.17.340 by any person entitled to notice under 18. 12. 120 or Lho decision by the close of City husiness dory within 10 disys after notice of the decisiun is published in a newspaper of general circulation as provided by 18.37.120(m). (2) Tho Commission or Council, on its own motion, seeks Lu hear the matter by a resolution filed within 10 days of lhes publication of the notice as provided by 18. 32 .240(x) . (b) Any decision made by any other Approval Authority under ::ectinr� 18.32.090(b) or (c) may be reviewed by the Council by: (1) The filing of a Notice of Review as provided by 18 37 140 by any party Lo the docision by the close of City busin—is day within 10 days of the sending of the notice of final decision a3 provided by, or (2) The Council or Commission, on its own motior►, seeks review _ by resolution filred wil.hin 10 days of mailed notice•. ..f the final decision, or (3) Referral of a matter under Section 1R. 37.090(d) by lho initial hear°irvjs body to the Council, upurr e.lusufo .,f the hearing, when the case presents a policy issue, whist, requires Council deliberation and determination, ire wtri..h a ' case the Council shall decide ttee application, (e) Failure to file an appeal or petition Por review shall bo deoe•med a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. It is the purptsse of this section to provide Ltso parties every romedy pos%ible. The filing of an appeal or petition fur review i,4 a ce.►rdit i.%r► precedent to litigation. 111 . 57 ,r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 7/28/86 AGENDA ITEM N: DATE SUBMITTED: 7/16/86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Upheld Hearings !SSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Land trade Officer's approval with amendments as allowed by lot line adjustment PREPARED BY: Keith Liden M 1-86 REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: f'' � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: - POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Hearings Officer approved CU 1-86/SL 6/86/M 1-86 subject to conditions and following an appeal, the Council upheld the Hearings Officer decision but modified the conditions. The Lot Line Adjustment allows the City to give or sell the 16 foot wide strip and the purpose of this meeting is to decide whether or not the City should follow through with the transaction. Attached are copies of the assessor's map and the applicant's site plan. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve sale or donation of the 16 foot wide strip. 2. Maintain this area under City ownership. SUGGESTED ACTION { Review relevant information, recommendation of legal counsel, and make a determination as appropriate. dj/45 RESOLUTION NO. 86- Page 1 15Qt �`�- 1600 1800 ., • Np'/ic. 1700 x SEE MAP / 2S 1 2AC 2800 �+ .33Ac. 2700 46 2900 c X260 23 Ac. ti .56At. /PAa p 115 A s rf*s, p z ;D 22001• R. A I AP i3 uT / 4 C , a J SEE MAP 2S:1 208 Q � ,PLbZ � _' �- S, �r --"'r--'-�-�- I ���a� _ +fid i .� D Ot ,� .�.y..� , . .- �, �� F � � � � o� - o __ � �n� � �� � y a� c � �W `' ` o�a �,ti a. . a � � � 3q - o � `e' � J V Z� j � � 4 -. �- � � � � � .. � � � �'� ��yy h � W � - � ' ....: � N . 0 �. _ �! 1 ! 1 : � �":'...r RAGEN, ROBERTS,TREMAINE,KRIEGER, SCHMEER,O'SCANNLAIN &NEILL MICHAEL 0.ALLPORT FRED M.AEBI LAWYERS DAVID C.BACA GARY M.ANDERSON ^''� 2300 FIRST INTERSTATE TOWER DUANE A.BOSWORTH 11 DOUGLAS G.BECKMAN \ PETER M.BURRELL PATRICK G.BOYLSTO R� PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 MARY CHAFFIN ••' DOUGLAS R C (J \\`/\] TELEPHONE 15031 241-2300 CLAUDIA M-COLEMAN— RICHARD M.G TELECOPIER 45031778-5299 SEAN DONAHUE 1 TIMOTHY W.HE i�,'1[ HUNTER B.EMERICK* DAVID J.KRIEG �` 1 �U DOUG E.GOE MILTON C.LAN •.C. I tJ L RODNEY[ LEW J •} WASHINGTON,D.G.OFFICE FRANK 0.HA ILI JER ,JR. D.CHARLES MA ' uD SUITE BOO THOMAS i.HILLIER WILLIAM R.MILLER,JR• T�/ O� `�'AI` 2300 M STREET,N.W. WILLIAM L.MITH*'LARKINi,JA. CHRIS L.04 LLMANN CII \ �' WASHINGTON,MC.20037 JAMES S.SMITH*' JAMES K.N[11.L,JR. V 11 12021 333.8400 PAMELA i.ST[BB[DS ROBERT O.NEWELL' NNiNG pEP WALTER H.EVANS 111 JOSEPH M.VAHLEUVEN DIARMUID F.O1SCANNLA OF COUNSEL TIMOTHY R.NTZI9NOLP9T MARK A.WENTZf[N RONALD K.RAGEN RICHARD D.ROBERTS OREGON AND CALI►08N1A 8A08' HARVEY W.ROD[Ri OBEBDN AND WASHMQTON 8AN11" MICHAEL H.SCHM[ER,RC. July 1 15 1986 OREGON AND nMAR BARS" VICTOR O-ST'ISOLT y , OREBoN AND NEW YORK BARB � �� H.STEWART TRENAR'IE.P.C. 0490ON AND NEVADA BASS—* OF COUNSEL GEORGE BLACK.JR. RICHARD[.K[KT WILLIAM A.MARTIN WATSON D.ROs[RTSON Mr. Keith Liden Planning Department City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Lot line adjustment Burnham Business Center Dear Mr. Liden: At the request of Ms. Marilyn Bishop, House Counsel for Pacific Frontier Wood Markets, I am writing you concerning my findings regarding the existence of an easement over a 16 foot strip of land between Lots 5 and 6, Burnham Tracts. The strip is currently owned by the City of Tigard which it acquired from Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels, Contractors, as part of an exchange in 1983. Pursuant to a preliminary title report issued by Safeco Title Insurance Company on March 25, 1983, the strip was subject to an access easement created in 1933 in favor of the westerly adjacent property owners. Since the easement affects the entire strip it does not appear to be suitable for building any structures on it. I enclose herewith a copy of the title report to which I am referring. In discussing this matter with Mr. Tim Ramis, attorney for the City of Tigard, I advised that based upon my examination, our position was that Pacific Frontier Wood Markets had not only an express easement dating back to 1933, but also a pre- scriptive easement arising from the continued use of the strip for access over the past 50 years. In an effort to resolve the matter amicably, in June 1985, the City of Tigard agreed to remr)ve the recently constructed barricade which had prevented our access, and discussions were undertaken to see if the matter could not be resolved by the City deeding Pacific Frontier Wood Markets the 16 foot strip, in consideration for which Pacific Frontier would dedicatee some of the adjacent flood plain area for a City park. x RAGEN, ROBERTS, TREMAINE, KRIEGER, SCHMEER, O'SCANNLAIN & NEILL I hope the above is sufficient for your purposes. If you have any questions, or are in need of additional documen- tation, please contact me immediately. Very truly yours, 711; , ROBERTS TREMAINE, KRIEGER, & NEILL C� Of Counael PCQ/ms Encl. ccs Ms. Marilyn Bishop Mr. Tim Ramis a7 :gin . ORF-118(12-79 SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE GOK +eyp 9011 S. W. Beaverton Highway OF OREGON Portland, Oregon 97225 MAR 28 1983 P.o. Bo: ss1 Beaverton, Oregon 97075 PRELDaNARY TITLE REPORT C" of r� © Telephone: (503) 297-4941 3/25/83 Order No. W 25154 To: CITY OF TIGAW 12755 S.W. Ash Tigard, Oregon Attention: Bob Thompson Customer Ref: DANIELS, WIGGINS & DANIELS - CITY OF TIGARD Standard Owners $ 1,000.00 Premium $100.00 We are prepared to issue a title insurance policy in the fora and amount shown above insuring the title to Lhe property described herein. This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shay. become null and void unless a policy ie issued, and the full premium therefor paid. Vesiees DANIELS, ti Wlof ROOLLIND J. DANIELS, SALORC.WIGGINSr �h� consisting and GERALD L. DANIELS. Dated as of: March 17, 1983 at 8:00 a.m. Subject to the exceptions, exclusions, .conditions and stipulations which are part of said policy, and to exceptions as shown herein. SAPECO TITLE INSURANCE OOMPANY OF OREGON Z. By: .._�..��.. we l Title Off icer i Order No. W 25154 Page No. 2 DESCRIPTION: The Southeasterly 16 feet, measured Washingtonright angles e0rto the southeasterly line, of Lot 5, BURNHAM TRACT, county, EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes for the fiscal year 1982-83, partial payment has been made Amounts $290.93 1936 ;71an ytater�t Account Na.s gay 462216 Hap: 2S1 2AD 02400 Levy Code: 023-20 2. City liens, if any, of the City of Tigard, (An inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk concerning the status of said liens and a report will follow if such liens are found.) 3. The promises herein described are of assessment ofject to the the Unified itatutory powers including the powd Sewerage Agency of Washington County. 4. the rights of the public in and limitsthat s.iiportion Busnha�ethe Avenuas� herein described lying within the S - so lealsLhtd, st dsad.' inel"'Kvg t2W:tom Am& p'rovisioas Dated: April 29, 1933 Recorded: May 2, 1933 Rooks 151, Page 153, Records of Washington County 1='twos..ofs #"Stwrly Adiacow Property Owners+ For: Road Affects: All of the herein described property. Said ea smut was also reserved in deed recorded in, Book: 226, Page 317, Records of wachington County. 6. The terms and provisions of Daniels, Wiggins 6 Daniels, Contractors partnership agreement, a copy of which should be furnished for our examination prior to closing. SAS t. Order No. W 25154 page No. 3 EXCEPTIONS: NOTE: We find no judgments or United States Internal Revenue liens against: CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon. End of Report. a1W 4 S w i 2S 12 AC 2800 ...,}� p ♦A� G� .34Ac. 2700 I i ` ,4oAc. 's 2900 ° 260 0 1° 2500 % ti e 3000 r �c + `�° • , J.O4 A c 2?00 'sr Ar r ,M r •� ,9r0 SEE MAP j' *.` Sr 2Si208 2 ST. 0 ~ .a s a sem' • • ! .Si":. I CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 28 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: July 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Resolution by ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: MACC Board to Consent to Sale Storer-Tidel Cable Franchise Sale PREPARED BY: Joy Martin and MACC REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _ POLICY ISSUE Transfer or ownership of the Cable Television Franchise from Storer to Tidel Cable. INFORMATION SUMMARY Member jurisdictions of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission (MACC) are requested to approve the resolution prior to re-drafting the Franchise Agreement The MACC Board has reviewed Tidel's legal, technical and financial capability to follow the terms and conditions of the Agreement. On June 25, 1986, the Board passed a resolution recommending the approval by member jurisdictions of the sale. The attached resolutions is prepared in response to this action. Attached to the resolution are supporting documents from MACC for this decision. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Pass the attached resolution. 2. Do not pass the attached resolution. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the resolution consenting to the transfer of the cable communications franchise agreement to Tidel Communications, Inc., from Storer Metro Communications, Inc. JM/dc:41 N4]ETROPOLXrAN AREA CON CATIONS CON 04ISSION z "j 12655 S.W. Center Street •Suite 390•Beaverton, OR 97005-1601 •(503) 641-0218 Jure 25, 1986 TO: MACC MEMBER JURISDICTIONS a FROM: WILLIAM J. TIERNEYs MACC ADMINISTRATOR RE: TRANSFER OF CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE The MACC Board is recommending the member jurisdictions of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission give their consent to a change of ownership of the Cable Communications Franchise to Tidel Communications, Inc. from Storer Metro Communications, Inca This recommendation is made following review by the Board of Tidel°s legal, technical and financial capability to operate the system according to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. I direct your attention to the report contained in this packets for information about the sale and our analysis of it. This packet contains MACC Resolution 86-02 which includes the report spoken to above. The Resolution formally makes our recommendation to consent to the transfer. It also contains a draft resolution for you to act upon. Upon action by the City Councils and Washington County Commission, please execute and return a certified copy of the resolution. MACC staff will redraft the Franchise Agreement to reflect the change of ownership and provide copies for you to execute. You can anticipate receiving a redrafted Agreement by the end of the summer. it you cannot schedule your meeting according to the enclosed meeting schedules please contact MACC. If you wish to have Tidel officials attend your meetings please contact them directly. WJT/team Enclosures cc: Fresa ' MACC Board Representatives and Alternates 4 ;& .�_.,. •,e �. a c +';y' ,p - '}. METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RESOLUTION 86-02 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE MEMBER JURISDICTIONS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION THAT THEY APPROVE THE SALE OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE TO TIDEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FROM STORER METRO COMMUNICATIONS. INC. WHEREAS, Storer Metro Communications, Inc. (hereinafter Grantee) requested, by letter dated May 5, 1986 and supplemented by letter dated June 18, 1986, which are both attached as Exhibit "1", pursuant to Section 3.5 Franchise Non-Transferable of the Cable Television Franchise Agreement, that the casia television franchise be transferred to Tidal Communications, Inc. (hereinafter Tidal). an Oregon corporation with its principal office in Portland, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission (hereinafter Board) elected to consider the request to ascertain if Tidal has the legal* technical and financial ability to operate the cable television system under the terms and conditions of the Cable Television Franchise Agreement, and to make a recommendation to the member jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Board requested certain information of Tidal to assess the prospective buyers legalf technical and financial qualifications and this request was complied with and is attached in the original resolution as Exhibit "20: and WHEREAS, the Board reviewed the information, heard testimony from William M. sauce, President, Tidal, regarding Tidel's legal, technical and financial qualifications, and heard testimony from Patrick Cleary, Vice President, Chase Manhattan Bank, in support of Tidal's financial qualifications; and WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on June 18, 1986 and approved a report outlining the key issues which is attached as Exhibit "30. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission as follows: A. The Board, based upon the evidence presented and its own research, is of the opinion that Tidal possesses the legal, technical and financial qualifications to operate the cable television system under the terms and conditions of the Franchise Agreement. B. The Board, based upon testimony of William M. Sauce believes Tidel is fully aware of the terms and conditions of the Cable Television Franchise Agreement and agrees to operate the .n system in compliance with those terms and conditions. MACC RESOLUTION 86-02 PAGE 2 C. The Board recommends the member jurisdictions concur with its findings and grant a transfer of the Cable Communications System Franchise Agreement between the Jurisdictions t.. Participating in the Metropolitan Area Communications Commisssion and Storer Metro Communications# Inc. to Tidel Communications* Inc. D. The transfer will become effective upon the consent of all member jurisdictions and the filing by Tidel of the following with the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission in a form satisfactory to the Commission: 1. Formal acceptance of the Franchise Agreement indicating that Tidel agrees to be bound by all terms and conditions thereof; and 2. Certificate of Insurance pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Franchise Agreement: and 3. Evidence that a security fund of $100,000, pursuant to Section 9.2, has been deposited in a bank account maii#tained by the Commission, or that Tidel has acquired the existing security fund originally deposited by Grantee; and d. Proof of the posting of a $100#000 faithful performance bond, pursuant to Section 9.35 and 5. Evidence that the financing of the purchase of the cable system is essentially the same as that presented to MACC staff and legal counsel on June 17, 1986, and that all financing is completed. E. Filing of its acceptance of the Franchise Agreement and all other documents by Tidel must be completed within 45 days of the approval of the 15th member jurisdiction to do no. Failure to timely file the information shall make the approval of the jurisdictions null and of no effect. The approval of the transfer shall become effective upon MACC formally determining that all member jurisdictions have approved the transfer and that Tidel has submitted all required documents. F. Upon completion of item B. above, the membes jurisdictions and Tidel shall execute a Franchise Agreement upon the redrafting of the Agreement by MACC staff to reflect the transfer. Adopted by the Board of Comissioners of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission this day of Jun//e, 1986. ve M. R 1 pac MACC Chair r MACC RESOLUTION 86-02 EXHIBIT "1" R METRO ,4aS.W.a aor,Court (` BBeaverton. 9 Beaverton.Oregon 7005 . 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (503)6"-3188 CAN MURRELL VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS May 5, 1986 Metropolitan Area CmTmr icaticns Ommnissicn and Member Jurisdicticd's 13655 S.W. meter Street, Suite 390 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Ladies and Gentle Storer Metro cations, Inc. proposes to sell its cable oMXIOf icaticsss system located in the area of the Metropolitan Area txsmmission juxt_edictions to Tidel e>1n Micatiens, Inc., and in cocmection with such sale, to transfer existing franchises between the Metropolitan Area Qomcrr iraticaes Oonmission jurisdictions and Storer Matra to Tidal. Pursuant; to Section 3.5 of the franchise agreements, Storer matzo heresy r+egaosta approval fm n the Metropolitan Area Oanaaeicatians O msission and its msmbers to such transfer of the casting franchises. We will be happy to provide you such assistance in connection with this request as is feasible, and will prcowide you with the &=rrlentaticn ssgnired within the tinoe set forth in Section 3.5. Sinoerely, Dan Murrell Vice President of Operations EW jk cc: Jim Mine } [SACC RESOLUTION 86-02 EXHIBIT "1" SMRFR METRO ,"S.W.Brigadom HeaYertorl,Oregon 87005 .. COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (503)644-3188 DAN MURRELL VICE►RESIDENT Of OPERATIONS June 18, 1986 Mr. Williaal J. Tierney Metropolitan Area Oom &rACatiCW Cbmdssian 12655 S.W. Center Street, Suite 390 Beaverton, oa:egon 97005 Dear Bills lie: Transfer of K= Fran&Amw to Tidel tfcens• Inc. We wish to clarify our letter of May 5, 1986, as it relates to the current and pendi=ng de3liberatioas of the K= and its me d=s. In connection With the request for approval of the K= members for transfer of Misting franchises to Ti8e1 icntions, Itnc., effective taken the paged sale of assets by Storer NDUO lml uticaticns, Inc. to - Tidal Om mnicati+ons, Iw•• it in contamplated that Tidea Of the asset mm. would asset a the franchise obligations tamthe sale, and that Starer Metro Balt=dmt3ans, Inc. as grantee,. and Stars poet<nmicatand 0mir ions, •twou�ld s�eiiev�ed�tligations�ar3sirn9 or sucoesx= by Verger to be perfarmed =Aer the frna>dAms mgm equennt to the closing date. Sirnoerely, Ann Vice president of Operations EWjk cc: Jim Mmos+e MACS RESOLUTION 86-02 EXHIBIT "3" METROPOLITAN_AREA_COMMUNICATIONS_COMMIESION REPORT TO MEMBER JURISDICTIONS FROM THE MACC BOARD ON THE REQUEST TO TRANSFER THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE TO TIDEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FROM STORER METRO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ,TUNE 25, 1986 I• IMI�S�BI.��'aT�QN_QND_@AC�(G�Q4d�� On May 5, 1986 Storer Metro Communications, Inc. requested the cable television Franchise be transferred to Tidal Communications, Inc. , an Oregon corporation with its principal office in Portland, Oregon. This request was made pursuant to Section 3.5 EC�I,es�igs_�ogwlrgngfgCg�i�� of the Franchise Agreement. Section 3.5 and Section 3.6 Q160gg_ O_�gOtlg�, a related section, address the Grantors' responsibility and authority in the event of a request for an ownership change. Each Grantor, i.e. all the member jurisdictions, must give their consent in writing and may inquire into the qualifications of the prospective buyer to operate the cable system under the, terms and conditions of the Agreement. The MACC Board determined it appropriate to investigate the prospective buyer's legal, technical and financial qualifications and to make a recommendation to the member jurisdictions. To that and, the Board did the followings A. Requested detailed information of Tidal which was complied with and reviewed in a special Board worksession held on June 4, 1986. B. hard testimony by William M. Sauce, President, Tidal regarding the prospective buyer's legal, technical and financial qualifications, and knowledge of and willingness to comply with the terms and conditions of the Franchise Agreement at a special Board Meeting on June 13, 1986. Mr. Sauce's statements regarding Tidal'* ability to finance the purchase of the system were supported by testimony from Mr. Patrick Cleary, Vice President, Chase Manhattan Bank, which has guaranteed to provide the senior debt and serves as investment banker to Tidal responsible for securing subordinated debt and equity capital. C. Hold a public hearing on June 18, 1986. The public hearing was held "live" on Tualatin Valley Television, Cable Channel 22 and (� allowed for public testimony to be received via telephone and from those present in the meeting room. MACC RESOLUTION 86-02 EXHIBIT "3" REQUEST TO TRANSFER CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE I I. LEGAL_I�SSUES�a The Hoard found Tidal met the legal qualifications to assume ownership of the cable system as contained in the Cable Communications Act of 1984. Tidal stated it agreed to assume all the rights, duties and responsibilities of Storer Communications, Inc. and Storer Metro Communications, Inc. pursuant to the Franchise Agreement, including the provisions contained in Storer Metro's Proposal as incorporated in the Agreement by reference. It further stated it agreed to perform all legal obligations and responsibilities of the Agreement. Tidal was asked if there were exceptions and noted there were no exceptions. Tidal Communications was founded in 1980 to purchase and manage cable systems in the Pacific Northwest. It currently owns cable properties In Oregon, Washington and California, and serves as the managing partner for a limited partnership which owns a cable system in Oregon. Its cable systems serve 11,500 subscribers. s` William M. Sauce now owns over 99% of Tidal although he will be selling up to 20% equity in Tidal to finance the purchase. He is the only member of the Board of Directors, but again indicated the Board may expand after the purchase. Tidal's experience in operating cable systems is in classic cable markets where off-air television reception is poor. These systems located in rural areas have many fewer subscribers than the MACC Franchise. In fact the MACC subscriber base is three times the size of Tidel's combined current cable holdings. Tidal does not have direct experience operating a system as technically sophisticated as this one, nor with a subscriber base of 34,000. Additionally, it has no experience operating institutional networks and its community access operations are much more limited than the one operated by Storer Metro. Tidal intends to keep the current system manager. Although the Board recognized the lack of direct experience in operating large cable systems, a number of factors mitigated its concern. The system is builtout and has been operating for over three years. In 19869 it has met the the construction requirements, customer service standards, and technical specifications of the Franchise Agreement as amended in October 1988. Changes are not required to most compliance standards. Tidal intends to keep system management in place and its principal has personal experience in operations as large as the MACC franchise. -2- MACC RESOLUTION 86-02 EXHIBIT "3" REQUEST TO TRANSFER CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE IV. EMONU86-MUE9 Tidal is purchasing the system for $43,200,000 from Storer Communications, Inc. It is estimated to have additional expenses of $1,450,000 for brokerage and professional fees. The price will be $1,260 per subscriber, which is in line with prices paid for other cable systems today. Storer's capital investment was 050,000,000. Tidal is financing the purchase through senior debt t%249000,000) , subordinated debt ($17,000,000) and equity ($5,000,000). The financing package provides Tidal with $1,350,800 in beginning working capital. Chase Manhattan Bank is the lender for the senior debt and is serving as the investment banker to secure subordinated debt and equity. The equity will be provided by the sale of UP to 20% in Tidal Communications, Inc. The Company does not now have cash available to increase the amount of equity. The other cable systems it awns are not generating sufficient amounts of cash to be in a position to support the purchase or the operations of the MACC franchise. Consequently, the Board, as well as Tidal and their bankers, view this purchase as snore analogous to a a stand alone cable system than to a purchase by a multiple system operator. The Board requested and received a ten year projection of the cable system operations. It analyzed these projections to determine the validity of the assumptions and the Company$s ability to meet franchise obligations, repay debt and provide a return for investors. The ten year projections submitted by Tidal indicate that the cable system will generate sufficient cash to most all obligations including operating expenses, capital expenditures, and interest and principal payments on senior and subordinated debts during the ten years (1987 to 1996) with $10,390,000 accrued over and above expenses• The Board views the projections as tending to be optimistic. Statements at the June 13 meeting were made by Mr. Bauce and Mr. Murrell in defense of the projections' validity. In summary, the projections assume the followings A. A 31A per year growth in residential dwelling units. B. A 1% per year growth in penetration thouseholds subscribing to cable divided by total households passed by cable) from the current 48%, increasing to 57% by year 010. C. A 28% increase in revenue per subscriber in years 02 and 02 with a a 5.5% average increase over years 03 through 010. D. Operating expenses 10% below Storer Metro's current operating expenses in year 01. E. Operating margins (operating income divided by revenue) in excess of 42% in years 03 through 010. F. Interest rates averaging 11% over the ten year projection. -3- MACC RESOLUTION $5-02 EXHIBIT "3' REQUEST TO TRANSFER CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE The Board is principally concerned that there is little room for deviation from the projections before cash flow problems and the potential for operating problems will occur which could result in lowered levels of service in violation of the Franchise Agreement, as well as an inability to pay interest and principal on debt. Mr. Cleary from Chase Manhattan Bank indicated the loans would contain covenants restricting cash being taken out of the system prior to repayment of senior debt. Additionally, he indicated the bank is not inclined to turn off the cable system if the worse situation occurs but will seek to sell the system to another operator. V. Mr. Sauce stated he was familiar with the Franchise Agreement and Intended to operate the cable system in compliance with the Agreement. The Board identified the following key provisions to Mr. Sauces A. Interactive Services B. Franchise Few C. Security Fund D. Faithful Performance Bond E. Operational Requirements of the PCN including rates, installations, termination and subsequent deeding to MACC. F. Construction Requirements relative to new subdivisions, isolated homes, and multiple dwelling units. Q. Status Monitoring H. Quality of Service, i.e. telephone answering, customer service response, and technical specifications. I. Community Access Mr. Sauce indicated he was aware of each requirement and intended to cmmply with each requirement. -4- x _ MACC RESOLUTION 86-02 EXHIBIT "3" REQUEST TO TRANSFER CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE The Board recognizes the entreprenurial effort Tidal Communications is making to purchase the cable system and the risks involved. The Board believes based upon the evidence presented that Tidel Communications, Inc. possesses the legal and technical qualifications to operate the system. The Board has some skepticism regarding the financial projections and has a degree of concern because 88% of the purchase is being financed with debt,$ although the weight of the information is not so negative as to warrant the Bard challenging the financial ability of Tidal Communications to operate the system. The Board's concerns are tempo. somewhat by the ability of Tidal to secure financing at compatitive rates from a mayor lender. The Board believes it has been diligent in impressing upon the prospective purchaser the requirements of the Franchise Agreement and Its attitude of requiring strict compliance. It further has impressed upon the prospective buyer that compliance with the Franchise Agreement supercedes repayment of interest, principal and dividends. It has accepted Tidal's statements that Tidal will operate the system under the terms and conditions of the Franchise Agreement. After careful consideration, the Board recommends the member jurisdictions approve the transfer of the Cable Television Franchise Agreement to Tide1 Communications. Inc. froeee Storer Mletro Communicat tons, Inc. w -5- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA IDEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 28 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: — DATE SUBMITTED: July 18 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 74th W Cherry Sewer L.I.D. PREPARED BY: _ City Engineer IV _ REQUESTED BY: City Council r421 DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: -' �' � � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: "ol.TCY ISSUE Formation of a local improvement district for construction of sanitary sewer in the vicinity of 74th and Cherry. INFORMATION SUMMARY On April 28, 1986, a public hearing was held to consider formation of an LID for construction of sanitary sewer in the vicinity of 74th and Cherry. After hearing public testimony, the Council directed that an LID of reduced scope be considered. The attached Supplement to the Preliminary Engineer's Report describes the reduced LID. The reduced LID serves only six lots. Informal discussions indicate that four property owners support formation of the LID: two property owners oppose the LID formation. The attached Supplement includes a modified LID boundary. After hearing property owner comments in June, the proposed method of assessment was modified to better correspond to the benefits received by each of the six lots. If Council wishes to proceed with this LID, it will be necessary to schedule another public hearing and to formally notify each of the property owners. August 11th would be the earliest regular Council meeting when the public hearing could be scheduled. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt a resolution of intent setting a date for a public hearing on the revised LID proposal. 2. Reject the LID. 3. Direct that additional revisions be considered. SUGGESTED ACTION 1 Adoption of the attached resolution of intent setting the public hearing for August 11, 1986. (2645P) � w L a CL 0 G C u w a n C d cc { a s v o Y O O a 12 cY ^w ; 146 4 i 6 mJA-2 mp W- YmJY 10 "Z,` J .410 � � 1 � • .Q s a F.p+ «Cp .. .!r CA 1 J O yr pC y i. +!� q� • y 9 f] w w C C M C r �e 7$♦ M i IF I Ye t� C is m 4 a: 41 4 � �r • • t a j� s.♦ ' ! ::r i L J N 1 «M tlF LF i 11•.46 •. � M • 06 O NYO.S 1►W H• Y F F g g sillFWR �^oil _ 1 �r�~pC�, ' O M i ■ w `y M pp°, yN�s N 1 CP 6W Ji IW,�1 O.01 r 0 «t CITY OF TIGARD` OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 7/28/86 AGENDA ITEM #: 7' D DATE SUWQTTED: 7/ 18186 PREVIOUS ACTION: 188WAGENDA TIS: Authorize Advertisement for bids for PREPARED BY: City Engineer f� Y SW North Dakota St . •Improvement REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: -rpt__ CITY ADMINISTRATOR*. POLICY ISSUE Shall the Contract Review Board Authorize advertisement for bids for SW North Dakota Street Improvements? �T'ION MWftRY Project ST-3 in the Capital Improvement Program provides for resurfacing and reconstruction of SW North Dakota Street . between 90th and 95th Avenues. . The plans and specifications for the project are now ready for bidding. &T-12 ATIVES CONS 1 . Authorize advertisement for bids . Z. Direct that the plans and specifications be modified. 3. Stop work on the project. C)l Authorize advertisement for bids . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY �f AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: July 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Clarification of Purchasing Manual Procedures for PREPARED BY: R. R. Wooley Formal Bidding REQUESTED BY: A DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: v': tCITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE Procedures for formal bidding of contracts greater than $15,000. INFORMATION SUMMARY There is some language in the Purchasing Manual that needs clarification. It relates to formal bidding procedures. Prior to suggesting new language, we need Council direction. It is clear that Council approval is required on award of contracts in excess of $15,000, but it is not clear whether the plans and specifications should be submitted for Council approval prior to bidding. Council review prior to bidding provides the Council with an additional check point in the process between the budget approval and the bid award. However, Council approval prior to bidding also adds from one to three weeks to the project schedule (depending on the schedule of Council meetings) and adds more items to the Council's thick agendas. We are requesting that the Council (sitting as Contract Review Board) indicate which procedure is preferred. We can then draft some minor revisions to the Purchasing Manual to formally adopt the preferred procedures and to clarify the Manual. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Require Council approval of specifications prior to advertising for bids. 2. Allow staff to advertise for bids without additional Council review when the item is included in an approved budget. 3. Specify in advance (perhaps at budget time) which items must be submitted s for Council approval of specifications prior to advertising for bids. WORSTED ACTION Any of the alternatives are workable. The City Engineer prefers Alternative N2, as it allows more flexibility in scheduling of construction projects. (2653P) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMARY AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 8: DATE SUBMITTED: July 24, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Notice of 4ziat npcision•for MGP 3-86 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton a REQUESTED BY: City Council DEPARTMENT' HEAD OK: CITY ADMINXMATM: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the notice of Final Decision for: MLP 3-86, Kenneth & Diana Fraser - A request to divide a 16,246 sq. ft. parcel into two lots of 8,132 sq. ft. each on property zoned 13-4.5. � ALTEIFBMlT�1FS,+,�O�NBIOEREl7 1. Cali up for review on a date set by Council. 2. Approve as written. t .Approve as written., CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 3-86 (FRAZER) APPLICATION: Request by Kenneth and Diana Frazer to divide a 16,246 square foot parcel into two lots of 8,132 square feet each on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre). Location: Northwest corner of 97th Avenue and Elrose Street (WCTM 2S1 11BA) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application- subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FAG? 1, Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Division for the subject property. 2. vicinity Information Properties in all directions are zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4,5 units per acre). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The subject p-uperty is vacant and covered with tail grass. The applicant proposes to divide the parcel into two lots of 8,132 square feet each. All half-street improvements except for a sidewalk have been installed. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Building Division indicates that consideration should be given to the possible meed for storm sewer easements on the existing lot with respect to roof drainage. The Tigard Water District has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. However, it should be noted that all the debts for water improvements along SW Elrose Street (SOLARCREST) have not been paid by the owner. About ;1,530 is owed the water district for engineering, inspections, and administration as of November 1982. Only the most westerly lot would be affected by this and, then, only because a rebate is due for the water main installation of $13 per lineal foot frontage on Elrose Street. Total due to connect to the existing 6 inch main = =1,095,51 + meter ($775). CJ .11OT3 E -OF,"&CISTOIY' LP'3-46 --PAGE, 1 The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The subject property was included within two local improvement districts for street and sanitary sewer improvements (LID Nos. 25 and 28). b. The remaining assessments must be paid in full prior to recording the partition or the issuance of building permits. C. 97th Avenue is designated as a major collector street. In order to minimize the number of access points on such streets, the driveways for both parcels should utilize Elrose Street for access. d. Roof rain drainage must be connected to the public stormwater system. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has no objections to the proposal No other comments have been received. B, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed partitioning is consistent with the minimum lot size of the R--4.5 zone (7,500 square feet minimum). The proposal also meets the standards for lot width, lot area, and street frontage. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves MLP 3-88 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PARTITION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 2. The partition survey and legal descriptions shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. The City shall record the necessary documents after approval unless other arrmngements are made with the Director. 3. Standard half-street improvements namely concrete sidewalks, corner rains, storm drainage and utilities, and streetlights shall be installed along the SW 97th Avenue frontage to major collector street standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent iW ovements. 4. Standard half-street improvements including concrete sidewalks and drivosaiy aprons. storm drainage and utilities, and streetlights shall be installed along the SW Elrose Street frontage to local street standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements. ;'•- Ix"ItCE OF.OE;CM0N .- ML.P 3-96 - PAM 2 , r 5. Five (5) sesta of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 6. Sanitary and storm sewer details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. (Contact John Hagman regarding public improvements.) 7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond, the payment of a permit fee and & streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with, the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. 9. The remaining assessments for LID Nos. 25 and 29 shall be paid in full. 9. No direct access shall be permitted to 97th Avenue. 10. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. { D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners _ XX Owners of record within the required distance XX — The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON August 5. 198E UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 19.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. August 5, 1986 NMCE OF 'DECISION - MLP 3-96 - OWE 3 - 4. Questions: If you -have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Nall, 13125 SW Nall Blvd., PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. . PREPARED BY: Deborah A. Stuart, As stent Planner DATE I.-Y ' Willi�ua A. lbnahan, Director of Community Development DAYE APPROVED (DAS:sb/djS6) a .a F. • was a F1 TNaaTr� \'as• S ,'1 NOT3CE«f DECISION _-M—P 3-96 —•PAGE.4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: J111W_28.. 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0: R ?a DATE SUBMITTED: .Tnly, 9.1 _ 19R6 PREVIOUS ACTION: Direr• or of Cammunit_v ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Nntir•F nf Final nevelo2ment apgnroyal gn JuI _1R,19Rh— no..;ai nn _ SnR 14.-R6iW,a am TULCZn.16 PREPARED BY: plr.rtiPa REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the Notice of Final Decision for: 1. SDR 13-86 - APPROVAL with conditions of a request to construct two industrial buildings totaling 58,800 square feet and related facilities. The site is located on the south side of Tech Center Drive adjacent to• the Southern Pacific Railroad. TER(�ATIVEB QOiY, ZOERED 1. Apprve as written. 2. Call up for review on a date set by Council. �O�O�TW #CiZQM Approve as written. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 13-86 y Western International Properties to allow the APPLICATION. Request by construction of taw industrial buildings totaling 68,800 square feet and related facilities on property zoned I-L (Light Industrial) and I-4 (Heavy south side of Tech Centers Drive adjacent to the Industrial) and located on the4000 . Southern Pacific Railroad (WGTM 2S1 10C, TL 1100 Sport) t?ECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applicant subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted be A. FINDINGG OF FACT 1. Backgruund Lot Line Adjustment (M 16-85) was approved and recorded which enlarged the subject property. The former eastern property line coincided with the boundary between the I-L (Light Industrial) and {Heavy Industrial) eastern 256 zones. Since of thee zone designations were not changed, the is zoned 1--H and not the remainder is zoned I-L. 2. Vicinity Information The properties on the north side of Tech Center Drive are developed and zoned I-P (Industrial Park). The area to the south and east is zoned I-H and the land west of the railroad tracks is zoned I-L. Tech Center Drive is designated as a minor collector street and it is intended to cross the tracks and provide a connection to Bonita Rd ceding to Hunziker�Streeble andfHallrostreet extensions to Blvd. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The property is undeveloped and is covered primarily by tall grass. The applicant proposes to grade the site and construct two industrial buildings totaling 66,810 square feet. The o buildings will share a common central landing area with parkin located around the building perimeter. Storm drainage will be directed toward the railroad right-of-way to the west. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The public storm sewer line crossing the northwest corner of the property must be within a public easement. As a condition of approval for M16-85, the majority of this easement was dedicated. Confirmation of the recording of NOTICE OF DECISION - SOR 13-86 - PAGE 1 this easement should be provided and any remaining portion of this line without an easement should have a public easement recorded as a condition of approval for this development. b. Written verification shall be provided indicating that Southern Pacific Railroad approves of any necessary drainage improvements to be made within the railroad right-of-way. C. The method for disposing of stormwater runoff has been determined previously for the Tech Center Drive area and therefore a Sensitive Lands review is not necessary for the proposed public storm sewer line which crosses the subject property. The Building Inspection Division and the Tigard Water District have no objections to the request. The Tualatin Rural fire Protection District indicaes that all portions of the building must be within 250 feet of a fire hydrant. No other comments have been received. 8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION This proposal is consistent with Community Development Code requirements related to building setback ar,! height, maximum lot coverage, access, _ visual clearance, and landscaping. Additional discussion is warranted relating to parking, storm drainage, signs, and allowed uses. 1. Parking The Code requires that one parking space be provided for each 1,000 square feet of floor area for many industrial uses. Based upon the proposed size of the buildings, 66 spaces and one handicapped space are required. The applicant is proposing 276 spaces and two handicapped spaces. This will allow sufficient flexibility to accommodate the few uses permitted in the I-L zone which have higher parking requirements. The Code standard for parking space dimensions is 9 by 18 feet. All of the spaces shown on the site plan are 18 feet in depth and the widths vary between 8 and 9 feet. The Code permits the use of compact spaces (8-1/2 x 15 feet) for 25 percent of the required number of spaces as well as any spaces provided above the required amount. Based upon the above standards, the site plan must be amended so that a minimum of 5o spaces are a minimum of 9 feet in width with the minimum width for the remainder to be 8-1/2 feet wide. A wheel stop or equivalent is required three feet from the front of all parking spaces located on the perimeter of the property. Also, u landscaped strip of at least three feet should be provided between the street right-of-way line and the parking lot. These standards can be met by simply moving•the curb two or. three 'feet In from the - property- dine and -expandtng.;the landscaped I area devotest to ivy. Loan"landscaping material or a iideimlk can be located in the front thane •feat of a.parking-space. . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 13-86 PAGE 2 Finally, the Code requires that one secure bicycle parking space be installed for every 15 required parking spaces. This project must have five bicycle spaces with the location and design to be approved by tho Planning Director. 2. Storm Drainage The previous lot line adjustment approval required the dedication of a public easement for the anticipated storm sewer line located in the northwest corner of the property. An easement was submitted which included most of the necessary easement area. Since the construction of the storm sewer line was not necessary until the site was developed, the dedication of the remainder of the public easement was postponed to the site development review stage. 3. Signs The applicant intends to place one sign near each driveway entrance which will direct traffic to the appropriate driveway. The signs will be approximately six square feet in size per side. Given the nature of the project and the need to provide directional information at the entrances, these signs are appropriate. 4. Allowed Uses The project-is a continuation of the development on the north side ' of the street. It should be noted that the permitted uses are not identical because of the different zoning districts which apply. The applicant should review these differences with the Planning staff. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SOR 13-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. Five (5) sets of public improvement construction pians and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailed all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 3. Sanitary and storm sewer plan—profile details and concrete driveway apron details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. -4. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond and the - payment of a permit fee. Also, the *i' *MICE.-OF OECISIOW — SOR •13-96 -Z PAGE3 execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES8 BONDING, AND AGREEMENTS. r' 5. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which includes: a. Wheel stops or equivalent for all of the parking spaces adjacent to the north property line. b. A minimum width for 50 parking spaces of 9 feet. C. All remaining spaces shall be a minimum of 8-1/2 feet in width. d. Location for five bicycle parking spaces. The design shall also be approved by the Director. 6. A sign permit shall be obtained for the directional signs utilizing the dimensions, size, and design submitted by the applicant. 7. The applicant shall provide the remainder of the public storm sewer easement between the rights-of-way for the railroad and Tech Center Drive. Said easement shall be prepared on City forms (enclosed). Contact Jahn Hagman of the Engineering Division. 8. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant i owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON July 29, 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. NMCE OF DECISION SDR 13-86 - PAGE 4 , The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. July 29, 1986 4 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of ff= Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW t Hall Blvd., PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. -xb E £D KeithS. Lidera, n r Planner TE W Lam A. Monahan, Director of Community Development 0 E APP ED ; (KSL:sb/dj54) for 3.+._ DECISIW -_ SDR 13.=96 PACE-.S : MEMORANDUM �e CITY OF TIGARQ, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council July 18, 1986 FROM: loreen Wilson, Recorder SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 86-87 Wok ?laps r n; The information for receive and file on the 7/28/86 agenda (08.2b) is the same information received in your 7/19/86 Council packet. Please bring this material with you. lw/3955A ��a 6 w � V � J O K 3 Q Z U a y v �i m d Y W � x 4. D p O N6 m� Q• ti dl w L 09d wQ V� ` 1 M S " 1 a M v Y M 81 41 r Y q d r «r r t ai sI` c i i • w c w ~ m a 1 +� It 06s gi C A CL 40 u L6 ` M gC d Ot L �' � CC S v v', •• m Q ■ y y� w sA -cc owi {»Q� w c G C6 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O. 0 0 'O 0 0 x CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON l5 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: July 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE: ;Administration Department Monthly PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet Report REQUESTED BY: lAdDEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE F Monthly Departmental Reports x' INFORMATION SUMMARY The Volunteerism Report through Jane 30, 1986 is attached. You may note some significant increases in Volunteer Staffing and Board and Committee service. The Green Thumb Program was cut back this year showing a reduction in Federal Assistance. Community Service is also off significantly. The "Other" column is where we shag volunteerism in the parks, ie, Rotary at the Civic Center etc. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and fila. dr:ao Sx 4. k MEMORANDUM f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGOM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: July 16, 1986 FROM: Donna. Corbet, Executive Secretary. (' SUBJECT Wan-Staff Resources/volunteer Report Category 1984-85 June 30, 1986 1985-86 % Charge Boards i Comaittees: 2552,75 1342 3108.75 + 22% Volunteer Staffing 4173.75 2930.75 5171.25 + 24% Federal Assistance 2660 715.5 1614.5 - 39% Cosounity Service 1676- 159 562 - 66% Other 1300 228 283 - 78% TOW: 12,362.50 5375.25 10739.50 t {0961p� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 7/28/86 AGENDA ITEM #: . � G DATE SUBMITTED: 7/16/86 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Dept. Report May and June, 1986 PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan Community Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: L,2 CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the May and June department reports for Community Development. Business is booming! ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Accept and place on file SUGGESTED ACTION Staff suggest that the City Council accept and place on file the Department Reports for Community Development. dj/52 w� zv MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council July 18, 1986 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report — June 1986 June of 1986 was a very successful month for the Community Development Department. Among the highlights were: iso — Increased enforcement of business taxes, over 5OO letters were sent to identified business which did not hold business tax receipts. Initial returns were very encouraging. — Capital projects involving city crews at Cook Park and Watkins Street were nearing completion. Operations staff devoted 283 hours to the Civic Center project, mostly in the area of grading and installation of the irrigation system. - A very productive work session was held with the City Council, Planning Commission, and staff. Work items for the upcoming year were identified. - Development activity continued at a strong pace. Engineering and L` planning reviews required significant staff time. - Building activity was exceptionally high. Among the key indicators were. - 0 43 single family permits issued (the fourth month of 40 or more permits in 1986, 225 through June in total). a Issuance of permits for 100 multi-family units on 135th Avenue. — r n h i o Building permit and plan check fee revenues of $40,595.00. June was the highest revenue month in the past four years. Through June, revenues were as follows: o Building Permits $ 107,293.72 o Plan Check 56,676.66 o Plumbing Permits 32,337.90 o Mechanical Permits 5,705.50 TOTAL $ 202,013.78 We are exceeding 1985 by $8,600. -- Codes enforcement was in high gear as increased staffing allowed for prompt review of code violation complaints. Voluntary compliance following official City notice was encouraging. Most cases were closed following compliance. - Attorney Marvin Bowen was hired as the City's Civil Infraction Ji Hearings Officer. d j,/52 r 3$��, C>..:,+,. a�'^-•—E t,:-srz=. .,y„s; =':x�-. _ .�. _sr`'-aas_:,� `=.+-�.t.-..r.. - _ �.. - f" BUILDING SECTION — JUNE COMPARISON MONTH: June 1985 June 1986 Single Family Permits 24 43 Multi—Family Permits (units) 0 100 Commercial Permits (new) 1 2 Building Permit Fees $ 91602.00 $26,887.50 Plan Check Fees $ 5,407.49 $13,707.54 Plumbing Permit Fees $ 3,335.00 $ 4,900.00 Mechanical Permit Fees S 652.00 S 1,679.50 Valuation $3,484,300.00 $6,796,370.00 YEAR TO DATE: January — June January — June 1985 1986 Single (Family Permits 135 225 Multi—Family Permits 332 106 Commercial Permits 7 7 Building Permit Fees $93,320.50 $107,2.93.72 Plan Check Fees $37,981.80 $ 56,676.66 Plumbing Permit Fees $56,577.28 S 32,337.90 Mechanical Permit Fees $ 5,512.50 $ 5,705.50 Valuation $24,550,499.00 $25,227,904.00 �Y dj/52 ^°t 5 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council June 24, 1986 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report — May, 1986 The Community Development staff was involved in the following areas: Landscaping of the Civic Center in place of the subcontractor originally hired for the job. Over 230 hours of staff time were ? committed to the project. Construction of the interpretive center which completes the Fenno Creek Park. — With the Hiring of George Steele as a temporary employee, the 3 staff began enforcement of the new Civil Infractions Ordinance. Single family construction permits exceeded the comparable period of 1995 (36 as compared to 28). — Public improvement and building inspection activity was very high with construction seasonally high, as expected. — Planning staff continued to gather the names of businesses s suspected of doing work in Tigard without payment of business tax. Enforcement is scheduled for June. =s — Capital improvement programs moved forward with Randy 4pooley .' coordinating project engineer activities. No significant problems developed in May. Some work program activities of Operations such as road side mowing and park maintenance were postponed to allow staff to undertake the Civic Center landscaping. Support staff from the Development Services sections gradually were freed up from their ongoing nvolvonnt in Civic Center construction. (WNVbr40) ..K s -" BUILDING SECTION - MAY COMPARISON k ay F May 1965 May 1986 MONTH: � 28 36 E Single Family Permits O 0 Multi-Family PQrmits (units) 1 1 Cormercial Permits (new) $15.161.00 $23.670.30 w Building Permit Fees $ 9,687.71 $ 6.136.54 Plan Check Fees $18.247.50 $ 4.977.50 Plumbing Permit Fees $ 1,699.00 $ 911.00 Mechanical Permit Fees $3.096.475.00 $2,834,339-00 Valuation January - May January - May YEAR TO DATE: 1985 1986 121 let Single Family Permits 332 6 Multi-=Family Permits6 5 Comseercial Permits $83,718.50 $80.406.22 Building Permit Fees $32.574.31 $42,969.12 Plan Check Fees $53.242.28 $27,437.90 , . $ 4,026.00 nePlumbing Permit Fees $ 486050 chanica4l Permit Fees $21,066,199.00 $18,431,534.00 Valuation di/52 _ s si MEMORANDUM �) rr CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON it TO: Mayor and City Council July 15, 1986 FROM: Doris Hartig, Deputy Community Services Director SUBJECT: June 1986 Departmental Report During the month, Municipal Court staff moved into their area. How to improve the acustics &eliminate some of the noise in that specific work area is being studied. The Department is gradually sorting, unpacking, and getting settled into their areas. Everyone is enjoying the new Canon copy machine. The new Word Processing Section Manager was hired - Sherrie Burbank. She will be responsible for getting "on-line" the new word processing upgrade this fall. The conversion to monthly sewer service bills was implemented this month with one-third of the City receiving billing for June & July. The cycle for one month billings for the entire City begins in August. The following workload indicators will detail further what was accomplished during the month of June. �x WORKLOAD INDICATORS JUNE, 1986 JUNE, 1985 Purchase Orders Processed 136 31 Recruitments 3 2 Hires 1 3 Termination 1 1 Unemployment Claims 0 2 Claims Files - SAIF 3 1 - Liability (see attached report) 2 5 Checks Written - Accounts Payable 419 227 - Payroll 255 xx Sewer Payments Received 1283 xx Sewer Bills Sent 1516 xx Nam /Address Changes 113 xx Cash Receipts 949 680 Word Processing Work Orders Received 222 99 Emergency Requests 60 36 Pages Processed 5217 10659 Average Turn-around (hrs.) 9.5 7 Telephone Calls 11051 4982 Walk-ins * 1800 Volunteer Hours 64 -0- Function has changed - we do not have one central station. Citizens now go to Municipal Court, Cashier, & Community Development. uw` xx information not available. 1w13963A' r .. 7/7/86 CITY OF TIGARD (� CLAIM STATUS REPORT 4 STATUS OF LOS$ CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION 2/13/85 Mervin Soon False arrest pendia $!2118! Goorgs Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity (Officers Johnson, Ober, , t Newman) 214/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 812A/$3 Fred Azan False arrest Appeal Fired (Officer Killion) 1/11!85- harry Field Alleges False Arrest Pending (Office Merrill) 7/20185 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened glib/$g Julie S. Winkelman Wrongful Death Pending it?/141$' Opal Kaske Failed to yield right-of- +say Pending rubra. $278.20 Collision paid Ron t Peggy Cole Loss of jewelry -- stolen Reopened after insured had possession Sui-Thank Ilan Insured hit claimant pulling Insured: :2,530.66 out from stop sign Claimant: $3.570.33 ,. Add'l. payment at $168.01 to claimant r . 4/g/gg John Hutchinson Trees cut on private Pending property - OW0886F) � 3 .". r � ry MONTHLY REPORT TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY June 1986 a1yc*6nrrAw10 OREGON TO: LIBRARY BOARD 25 Yew of SOMCO CITY COUNCIL 49644986 FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN WCCLS: The Structure and Governance Committee has been meeting to study options for continuing county-wide. library service. The Committee decided to select values and examine how different models will affect each value. They believe that this will en- able them to determine which model would give the best service in as objective a manner as possible. The goal is excellent county-wide library service. The common values in- clude: county-wide access, stable funding, cost effective cooperative services, local autonomy of libraries, a single governing body and funding for new libraries. Automation: The computer system is in place at the Aloha headquarters and it is now possible to enter our data. However, the cable cannot be brought into the Tigard Library yet because there is no conduit beneath Hall Blvd. for that purpose. Therefore, a staff person must travel to Aloha several times a week for data in-put. This is going to im- pact on our conversion of the collection and being ready with other libraries on the target date in December/January. Requests have been submitted outlining problem and insisting on early solution. New Hours: Beginning June 2 the library began service to the public from 1 to 5 PM, icreasing total weekly service to 501 hours. ]Personnel: Two part-time aides, Margret ladanza and Rosemary Woltring resigned. A third aide, Lauri Davis, has given notice for September. Three remaining aides have beet: assigned extra hours and recruiting has been started to fill vacancies. Volunteers: Forty-one volunteers gave a total of 447.50 hours; daily average 17.9 hours. Library board members gave 21 hours. Ycuth Services: 450 children signed up for the summer reading program which began June k6 The Jungle Club programs filled immediately with waiting lists. Five elementary school visits were made. Volunteers have been trained to work at the children's room desk when children's librarian is not scheduled. They are responsible for keeping room neat and organized, answering directional questions, directing que:ttiuns to appropriate staff per- son and distributing information brochures and rearing lists. r.irculation of all juve- nile materials is up 36%. Work Indicators: June 1986 .lune 1985 Adult Materials 6649 5?29 Juvenile Materials 5737 3663 TOTAL 12,386 9,392 Days of Service 25 21 Average Daily Circ 496 441 Increase/Decrease Circ +322 + 82 Reference/Readers' Advisory 399 216 Books in Use in Library 1157 907 S--orytime (sessions) 128 (7) 75 (3) Special Children's Programs 87 (3) 136 (3) CrMaterials Added/Withdrawn 397/14 621/8 oi Borrowers: New/Renewal 363/207-570 182/137-319 13125 SW Hall Blind.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 w r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON a COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: July 21 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0: � DATE SUBMITTED: July 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing on a ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: TU 9-86 ^July 14 1986 PREPARED BY: Deborah A. Stuart REQUESTED BY: _ DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �✓ t CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE K, a` INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 14, 1986, the Council made a motion to approve a temporary use permit for Irvington Moore to allow a one-year extension of TO 6-85 (which allowed a mobile office trailer on light industrial property) and to further allow placement of a second mobile office for a one year period on property located -« at $205 SW Hunxiker Street. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution. 2. Approve the attached resolution with amendments. SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Approve the attached resolution. dj/46 7, ;at- } CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 7128/86 AGENDA ITEM N: ' DATE SUBMITTED: 7/11/86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Final Order ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Correction adoption 5112/86 of Resolution No. 86-59 PREPARED BY: Keith Liden REQUESTED BY: Keith Liden _ f DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: F: �- CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE A - INFORMATION SUMMARY City Council adopted the above order for Gramore (First Interstate Trust) (SDR "6/V 5-86) on May 12, 1986. Through an oversight, the order noted the charges to be made to the Director's decision but it failed to apply the . 1' remaining conditions. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the correction for page two of the order. € dj/85 . ..t.. - Fos CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council July 16, 1986 FROM: Brian Hartung, Community Assistant SUBJECT: Transportation Committee Appointment The Tigard High School has submitted a name from the upcoming senior class to fill the vacant student seat on the Transportation Committee. I have attached a resolution appointing Kathy Pheister to that seat with her term expiring concurrent with the school term (June 30, 1986). CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY J AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: July 15, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: v ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Washington _ County Transportation Plan Update PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woolay - REQUESTED BY: Washington County DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: r�'Y }i CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Shall the City enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Washington County regarding City involvement in the County's Transportation Plan Update? INFORMATION SUMMARY The County will be updating its Transportation Pian during the next year. One goal of the update is to assure that the County's plan is coordinated with the plans of the various cities. Attached is a letter from the County's Planning Manager requesting a Memorandum of Understanding regarding City participation in the Plan Update process. In the Memorandum of Understanding, the County assures that the City will have opportunities to participate in the Plan Update process and the City promises that the City will formally consider adoption/recognition of the Plan after it is adopted by the County. At its July 10th meeting, the Transportation Advisory Committee of the City reviewed the Memorandum of Understanding and recommended approval. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. 2. Revise the Memorandum of Understanding. 3. Withhold approval. SUGGESTED ACTION City involvement in the County Transportation Pian Update is very important. The Memorandum of Understanding appears to be an attempt to promote ` cooperation and coordination between the City and the County. Staff recommends approval of the Memorandum. (2650P) II z .. WASHINGTON COUNTY, I9 s'= OREGON June 18, 1986 Bill Monahan, Planning Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: "Memo of Understanding" - Washington County Transportation Plan Update Washington County will be updating its existing County Transportation Plan during the next 12 to 15 months, with plan adoption scheduled to occur during the summer and fall of 1987. The County has retained the transpor- tation planning firm of OKS Associates to assist staff in this major planning effort. Your city will be participating in this important endeavor through the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee - Policy Group structure. Consistent with existing City/County Urban Planning Area Agreements and past practices, the attached Memo of Understanding has been prepared to formalize this arrangement. This Memo of Understanding is intended to serve an administrative purpose only and need not be officially endorsed by your City Council. Please note, however, that the Memo of Understanding calls for City Council formal recognition/adoption of the County's re- vised Transportation Plan at the end of the planning process. Please sign or have the Memo of Understanding signed and return it to my office by July 31 , 1986. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or Mr. Rod Sandoz at 640-3519. ly, r nt Curtis anning Manager db attachment q Department of Land Use And Transportation,Administration - 160 NorZh First Avenue Hiiisboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/648-8781 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: JULY 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEM N: /) J DATE SUBMITTED: July 21, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Resolution 86-67 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ALTERNATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR DELINQUENT BANCROFT PREPARED BY: J. Widner ACCOUNTS REQUESTED BY: J. Widner DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � �� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE The policy issue of this item is the collection procedure for delinquent Bancroft installment accounts. INFORMATION SUMMARY When the City Council declared Bancroft installment accounts delinquent in 1985, it was determined at that time that these delinquent accounts could make alternative arrangements to meet their obligations. Many of titose accounts did make alternative arrangements and have become current in their payments. .; Since Council's position was to avoid foreclosure if possible, I have gone ahead with the same position with the accounts were declared delinquent on June 23, 1986. Attached you will find a letter from Gervis 6 Dortha Terrill, stating they would like to continue making their semi-annual installment payments. They have paid all back billings and are current. You will also find an agreement stating these terms. I recommend that you review this agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Continue with foreclosure proceedings. 2. Allow the Terrill's to continue making semi-annual installments. 3. Prepare a different payment agreement with the Terrill's, i.e. monthly installments. SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend City Council to authorize the Mayor to sign a Payment Schedule Agreement with the Terrill's to continue with semi-annual installments. 1369F '' 1 � � . • , �, r - - . .•/ � s � I� � ,r / � � � f � ;, j ;� / � � , / ,� i ;, .- � �/ f � � / i / � r J J� .� � �� t � . n - :, � � � . � - � .� � � � � - - _ ` � � � , � � � r i / E� �� ,.. _.. . . P A Y M E N T S C M E 0 U L E AGR EEMENT The Tigard City Council has declared the entire assessment balance plus Interest on the property described (at the time of assessment), as 1S134CB L1700, 12160 SW Summer Street, Tigard, Oregon, immediately due and payable in full as authorized by Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 13 (Ord. No. 84-56), unless the property oyner enters into a formal binding payment schedule agreement acceptable to the City. The property owner(s) of said assessed property have not made full and complete installment payments. The outstanding balance through March 15, 1986 is $1,291.06. In lieu of foreclosure as authorized by the Tigard Municipal Code,Chapter 13 and Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS Chapter 223), the City of Tigard and Gervis and Oortha Terrill agree to the following payment schedule: The outstanding balance was paid July 2, 1996. The next installment is due September 15, 1986 and each March la and September 15 thereafter. Full and complete installment payments shall be paid on or before these dates. Failure to comply with the payment schedule of this agreement shall be a breach of this agreement, upon a breach of this agreement, the City shall proceed with collection by sale of the property as provided by Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 13 and Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS Chapter 223). Signed and dated this day of 1986. 1 Of Tigard '- hkatsi o+• Billing Address: 12160 SW Summer Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 , r g MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW EMPLOYEE Robert DATE August 4. 1986 W. Jean g POSITION City Administrator REVIEW PERIOD February - August, 1986 DEPARTMENT Administration LAST REVIEW March, 1986 REVIEWER City Council CURRENT SALARY f4098/mo- TYPE OF REVIEW: GOAL SETTING PROBATION^ PROGRESS PERFORMANCE XX 1. MAJOR GOALS/PROJECTS FROM LAST REVIEW: COMPLETION Z: (0_55% Little or No Significant progress..56-752 76-85Z Satisfaetarr..86-95Z Good Goal Achi veseut..96ol0OZ Exme ceeded oMost Yet To � d Expectations) * Work ?rograma(April Workshop. Goals & Policy Calendar Update) 0 Performance Indicators (Monthly Report Summaries. Annual Performance & Service Levels Report) o Productivity & Team Building (Police Dept. with Chief. Hid- Management Training) o Performance Evaluations (Clear Goals & Reviews of Staff) N A o Personnel Rules (7/86) & Merit System (9/86) a Computer Master Plan Implementation & Management (7/86-12/86) N/A * Community Recreation Plan & Park Board Workshop a utilities & Franchise Committee Workshop & Work Plan * County Urban Services Agreement/Urban Services Policy * Support Matsger/Washington Square Annexation o Labor Negotiations * Intergovernmental Relations A * Public facilities Plan (12/86) & CIP (6/87) * Community Involvemant/Information Program MIA * Transportation Plan Program (3/87) o Police Chief Selection & Support * Support Downtown Economic Dsvelopmsnt * Tax Base/Adequate funding Information & Support o Planning Commission Workshop & Work Plan (6/86) 2, ESTABLISHED PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONS: (Circle) Needs OX or Exceeds Improvement Satisfactory Expections ( - ) ( X ) ( + ) o Oral communications - X + 0 Britten communications X + o Leadership/initiative - X + .: a Problem solving/decision making - X + 0 Innovation/ingenuity/creativity - X + 0 Planning/organising - X + a Interpersonal sensitivity X + o Management control . - X + o Adaptability/flexibility/stress tolerance - X + o Resource utilisation/economy/cost control '- X + o Taas+ork/meating participation X + 0 Community relations - X + X + a _ X + 0 NOTES ON STRENGTHS AND WEAXNESSESt FOR OFFICE USEONLY EPR COMPLETED PAF COMPLETED NEXT REVIEW DATE EPR RET DATE PAF PIF C. S. & G. SIGNATURE DATE EPR PIF -- -- a. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON- COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Jul 28 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: ' July DATE SUBMITTED: July 18, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEOAGENDA TITLE: Street_- Vacation Request - Kneeland Estates PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson-L REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council initiated Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30 INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Richard Caffall of Lincoln Savings and Loan, has requested vacation of a 30' roadway easement and three 5' utility easements within Kneeland Estates No. 2. This request was required by a Planning Director's decision (M13-85) which approved lot line adjustments within the subdivision conditioned upon g vacation of the roadway easement and utility easements which ran along the old lot lines. If the attached resolution is approved, the public hearing would be scheduled for 9/8186. The City Recorder will mail notice to each property owner who would normally be required to sign a vacation petition. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolution calling for public hearing on 9/8/86. 2. Take no action at this time and require developer to circulate petition. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends alternative #1. lw/3967A MEMORANDUM � CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO, Honorable Mayor and City Council July 17, 1986 FROM; Bob Jean, City Administrator( V ting City Record SUBJECT: Appointment of Acer & Finance Officer Due to the recent organization change which created the Community Services appointments are necessary to fill the acting City Recorder and Department, appo appointment of Eoreen Wilson as Finance Officer poserve xa thea Acting for a sitions. I would recommend apps the Acting City Recorder since she has filled the City Recorder Punct number of years. As the Acting mepartment Head, I would :r Finance officer for the present i lw/3955A f 3t �w �y { • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 'SUt"ARY q _ AGENDA OF: July 28, 1986 AGENDA ITEC{ B: l o DATE SUBMITTED: July 24, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTLeft. Park tour June 17, ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Jack Park 1986. restrooms PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton REQUESTED BY: Elizabeth Newton DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ✓ /'' CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SSUI MARY During the June 17, 1986 park tour, some concerns were expressed about the condition of the restrooms at Jack Park. Staff has done some research into the options available to the City. Attached is a memo which outlines the F. procedure necessary to remove the restrooms and a memo which outlines the costs to restore the restrooms. F k 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1.) Direct staff to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms. 2.) Direct staff to proceed with the restoration of the restrooms. E STEO ACTION a Direct staff to request permisssion from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council July 24, 1986 FROM: Planning Staff MA i SUBJECT: Jack Park restrooms During the June 17, 1986, tour of the City's park facilities some concerns were raised about the condition of the restrooms at Jack Park. As a result of z those concerns staff has researched the City's options concerning those facilities. Because the restrooms were constructed in part with Federal Grant, the City must obtain permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to tear down the facilities. The Bureau of Recreation requires that the City submit a letter to Al Cook with the Oregon State Parks Department requesting permission to tear down the facilities if that option is chosen. The letter must contain the estimated cost of restoring the facilities and a statement that the Council has directed staff to request permission to remove the facilities. Obviously restoring the restrooms is also an -option, as outlined in the attached memo the estimated cost for restoration is approximately $14,039.00. At this time staff requests Council direction as to how to proceed. Staff's recommendation is to request permission from the Federal Bureau of Recreation to remove the restrooms. { 2657PJdomJ s M r M u R A N L' t' M TO: Bill Monahan aAOR I%W FROM: Jerry McNurlin WASHINGTON rOUWY.ORtG( , SUBJECT: Jack Park Restroom DATE : July 22, 1986 This is the estimated cost to repair the restrooms at Jack Park. The materials that j will be used is as Vandal Proof as we can obtain. It is the same type that is used c in jails and Federal Parks. {; 1 Toilets (3) $ 2,250.00 Urinal (1) ' 698.00 Sinks (k) 1,188.00 Band Dryer (1) 327.00 Partitions 2,026.00 '( i Roof (steel) 6,000.00 i Freight 350.00 Misc. 1,200.00 3 1 TOTAL $16,039.00 CC: Lia newton Curtis Spaan Pile _, 12M. SW ASH P.O.BOX 2339? TiGAR0,OREGON 9'223 PH 639417 t APPLICATION SHOULD BE RECEIVED NOT LESS THAN 10 DAYS PRIOR TO EVENT OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION APPLICATION AND AUTHORITY TO OPERATE -SRB-SRW APPLICATION IS MADE FOR: _3._ Special Retail Beer @$10.00 per day DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE No.of Days 1 No.of stands 1 Special Retail Wine @$10.00 per day No.of Days No.of stands NOTE: Fee must be paid by CHECK or MONEY ORDER PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT FIRMLY USING BALL POINT PEN 1. Applicant: Tigard Amari can Lg'i nn post _x158 Phone 2_6wBe L i38 2. Trade Name License Type Beer 3. Person Responsible at qvent . Do 3-cLean - COPMUMDER Phone—21ab - 4336 4. Mailing Address P.Q. Box ?.31.L82 City Tigard Zip 8722 5. DATE(S) AND HOURS OF EVENT(S) Aug. 1'L lo:00 to 7:ooP.H. 6. EVENT ADDRESS: Cooks Park CITY Tigard Zip X223 7. Type of Event:, pian)a. S. Above location is Within City Limits Yea-Outside City Limits Z 9. Boundaries of Event: Roped o area around coverscTarea Q 10. Method of supervision to insure compliance with liquor laws: Rtgnin Ing for a31 mAmbera and attests under contral of Bar Xgr. 11. Expected Attendance: 1100 t t o 500 12. I/We understand that a false or misleading answer to any of the foregoing questions may subject this application to denial. I/We certify that all information submitted i mplete and correct to the best of my/our knowledge. Signature(s) Date Date 13. AUTHORIZATION BY PROPERTY OWNED/0PERATOR CONTROLLING PROPERTY I own/control the property where this event is to be held,This application meets with my approval. Owner or Agent: Name Phone au 2 Authorized Signature Date w14. RECOMMENDATION OF CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE o Recommendation: Grant Den DEP ? Police Agency w Authorized Signature Date 15. THIS AUTHORITY 'S NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED BY AN OLCC REPRESENTATIVE License is Granted Recommend Refuse Date Issued c . BY Title . lu 'RESTRICTIONS Fee Paid Receipt# f. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY )!% AGENDA ITEM # AGENDA OF: 1986 DATE SUBMITTED: July 17 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution �_ Conditionally Accepting Improvements PREPARED BY: John Hagman _ Within Cotswold No--2 REQUESTED BY: Community_Development & Subdivision Developer DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: _ -v' CITY ADMINISTRATOR: - POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. "Cotswald No. 2" subdivision is located west of SW 135th Avenue near 531 Brittany Drive. 2. Construction of the public improvements therein has progressed satisfactorily and, now, the developer has requested that the Council place the work on its one year guarantee period. 3. The developer proposes to utilize the attached "Agreement With Depositor And Trustee On Savings Accounts Or Deposits" to assure maintenance of the work and installation of incomplete items and, requests release of the cash deposited as the original performance assurance. 4. A copy of the original performance bond is attached hereto (said bond to be released) and a copy of the replacement bond is attached hereto (said bond is to be held as the new assurance bond), for Council's information. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED b SUGGESTED ACTION PASS THE RESOLUTION TITLED: A resolution conditionally accepting public improvements known as Cotswald No. 2 subdivision public improvements and authorizing release of the original performance bond. r JH:sb/dJS8