City Council Packet - 07/21/1986 ti
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
STUDY SESSION MEETING MINUTES - JULY 21, 1986 - 6:30 P.M.
Washington County Commissioner Rogers updated Council on:
Durham Road Transfer-(favorable to City of Tigard)-
. �
Solid waste transfer stations - both sites off Cornell Road.
a
County urban services:
t.
Explained County will have base level services
Spec Distr will be used for any higher levels of services x
County Tax Base
Adopted Citizen Participation Plan
Toll free phones
Standarized road policy
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L t
REGULAR STUDY SESSION MEETING MINUTES - JULY 21, 1986 - 7:10 P.M.
1. -ROLL CALL: Present: Councilors: Tom Brian, Jerry Edwards, Carolyn r
Eadon, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Bob Jean, City
Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development
Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Donna Corbet, City
Recorder Pro-tem.
` 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS
4 2a(1) HOP 15-86 - approval to allow a fluid power system
consulting and brokerage business.
(2) Tamp Use w/conditions for Cruisin' Tigard '86.
5.1 Employee `rraining Request
5.2 Leadership Seminar Report by Councilor Eadon
5.3 County request for TALC/Transportation Representative.
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA - no one asked to speak.
4. TPI REPORT - Bill Monahan updated Council on the Cruisin' Tigard event
to be held on July 26.
�s
S. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that-an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
4.1 - Approve Council Minutes - June 16, 1986
4.2 Receive and File:
a. Community Development Land Use Decisions
b. Washington county Road -Jurisdicition Transfer Final Order
4.3 Approve Board and �ittee Appointments
NPO` -#1 Appointments (citizens representing the NPO #2 area) -
Patricia Cantrell 6 Daniel Gott
::.CITY,,-'COUNCIL MINUTES'.JULY 21, 1986 -'PAGE 1
' -3.. a.. ..ter.,. .. .....-„ ..., ........ .:..;..-a.-.....,._... .,—..... '. :__ —. _ _
f 4.4 Approve Council Meeting Calendar
4.5 Declare Surplus Property For Auction/Disposal - Res. No. 86-79
4.6 - Approve Sanitary Sewer Compliance Agreement (Conser) and Authorize
Signatures
4.7 Approve Carnahan's Addition Subdivision Extension Agreement and
Authorize Signature
4.8 Approve Resolution No. 86-78 Welcoming Japanese School of Portland r
a. Motion by Councilor Eadon seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt
the Consent Agenda.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6. NON AGENDA STEMS:
6,1 City Administrator presented the training request. A motion by
Councilor Edwards seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve.
Motian approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6.2 The Chamber of Commerce Leadership coordinator (Councilor Eadon)
presented a request to use the Civic Center Town Hall Conference
Room for their sessions. The general consensus was to approve the
request.
City Administrator discussed the lack of a council policy on the
use of the meeting rooms. Councilor Brian requested staff to
draft a policy and consider liabilities and bring to the
August 18, Study Session.
6.3 Washington county is requesting that the City of Tigard designate
a representative to their TALC Board. Bonnie Owens name was
suggested and Council deferred their recommendation to Councilor
Brian who is the Transportation representative.
7:35 RECESS TO PARK BOARD WORKSHOP
Chairman Graham opened the workshop. Members present were Elizabeth
Golden, Patt Biggs, Steve Slabaugh and Mike Shwartz. Council present as
above.
Chairman Graham outlined agenda and commented on the good maintenance at
parks that's being done this summer.
Cook Park - Land between Cook Park and the High School was discussed
with regards to purchasing for extra High School and park parking.
Summerlake Park - Steve Slabough reported on inventory status and
reminded Council that the Williams property still needs to be purchased
to complete park plan.
t,
r
m
=_ CITY `COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 21, 1986 - PAGE 2
r
The Parks Public Facilities Plan was discussed. The City Administrator 3
was asked to explain what has to be done in order to complete- the
C.I.P. Discussion followed and the consensus was that staff should a
provide maps for the Park Board to indicate needed improvements on. g
Further discusssion on workloads developed into consensus recommending
staff investigate the feasibility of hiring a parks planning intern to
develop a Parks Master Plan & C.I.P., allowing the Parks Board to remain
advisory,
Bill Monahan to prepare proposal for additional staff at August
council meeting.
Ratt Biggs reported on the after school and summerschool program.
Discussion on bike paths/sidewalks and school siting issues.
The determination of the City's recreation role was discussed, but not
resolved.
ADJWRNMENT: 9:40 PM
Acting City Recorder - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
or City of Tigard
DC:53 =
Sk
y
� {. =1tfLY -21..1986 —.=PAGE 3
sr�
7 a
N t
c- t
ti
a-
Z �
... O M
. 30
: r
vc
IL
m
a
one p
dlco
`
00 r1 riCm
4-4 a
+a
r `
46 49
k
w
_
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA 'ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: July 21, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 9: 4.5
DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUElAGENDA TITLE: Declaring
Surplus Property PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson
REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson
DEPARTMENT NEAD OK: Loreen Wilso CITYADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
Should Council declare unusable/damaged/outdated materials and equipment as
surplus so that these can be sold at auction?
9.< INFORMATION SUMMARY
»:- The City staff has developed a lic.c of surplus property which could be sold at
auction. Since the City didn't want to sell any surplus until after our
= relocation, it has been three years since Council declared surplus last. City
Of Tigard. purchasing rules and ORS allows disposal of public property in this
matter. At this time unusable materials are taking up valuable office and
storage space.
n" ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve resolution attached and declare surplus property.
{ 2. Modify surplus property listing and approve amended resolution.
S. Take no action at this time.
SUGGESTED ACTION
- Alternative #1.
LMl39SIA
-
CITY Of- TIGARD, OREGON
x
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGf:NUA O : -Jul-,,,. 21. 1986 AGENDA I FFM #:
DATE SUBMIIIED: Julv 17, 1986 PREVIOUS ACII:ON: Decision Sinned
I!;SU[IAGLNUA 11 ft_E: Notice of on 7-17-86 and 7-17-86_
Decision by &xmnunity PREPARED BY: Community Development Deft.
Development Department HOP 15-86 REQUESTLta BY: Council
TPI Temporary Use
OLPARIMEHI" NEAU UK: WITY ADMINISIRA1OR:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached are the Notices of Decisions for:
1) HOP 15-86 - approval with conditions of a request for a Home Occupation Permit
to allow a fluid power system consulting and brokerage business.
2) A Temporary Use Permit for approval with conditions for Cruisin 'Tigard' 86 on
July 26, 1986.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
_1) Receive and File at the July 21, 1986 Council meeting.
2) Call up for review on a date set by Council.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Receive and file at the July `21, `1986 Council meeting.
:. COUNCIL AGENDA 1986
CITY OF TIGARD
=OF111FARD
TEMPORARY USF CERTIFICATE
OREGON
25 Years of Sendoe
19AI-IM
has received approval for a
Temporary Use to Operate Cruisin 'Tigard' 86 at Main Street from
Burnham to Scoffins Streetsfrom 8:00AM to 12 Midnight
On 7. �26 19R h
This Temporary Use has been granted in accordance with Section 18.140 of
the Tigard Municipal Code and any special conditions listed below.
In addition, the grantee holds a current Tigard Business Tax Certificate
which expires on (If not applicable, tax I.D.
:f: 93-0877340 )
Applicant rune and address: Phone:
Ms. Judy Christenson 620-5351
P.O. Box 230391
Tigard, OR 97223
t
i
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: s
1) Applicantshall obtain a noise permit
2) Applicant shall provide a list of vendors prior to July 24.
x 3) Applicant shall provide copies of signed letters of permission from affected s
-property owners prior to July 24.
4) Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan prior to July 26, 1986
... Approved by: ` Oate: // �•
NAMzbr/15431P)
'j3MZNj4CN0VdP0.L&W=q7;Tj00rd Oregon 97223 (503)639-41Ti
�f . je
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
HOP 15-86
APPLICATION: Request by Richard V. and Doris S. Muralt for a Home Occupation
Permit to allow "Fluid Power Exchange Inc.," a fluid power system consulting
and brokerage business, to operate on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5
units per acre). Location: 12005 SW Ann Street (WCTM 2S1 36A Lot 111).
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of
Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The
findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted
below.
A. FINDING OF FACT
1. Background
No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning
Division for the subject property.
•2. Vicinity Information
Properties to the south, west, and north are all zoned and
developed R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre). Properties to
the southeast are in Washirgton County.
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
There is a 3,600 square foot home on the property. The applicant
proposes to use 350 square feet for the business. The applicant
will occupy the remainder of the home. The business as proposed
will not occupy more than 25% of the home.
4. Agency and NPO Comments
NPO 07 will be notified of the Director's decision and will be
given eche right to appeal.
B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the
Tigard Municipal Code.
C. DECISION
Home Occupation Permit HOP 15-86 is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1._ There shall be no paid employees working in the home in
conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home.
NOTICE OF DECISION - HOP 15-86 - PAGE 1
fl� yyrr
2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior
of the premises.
-3. There shall be N0 customers or clients coming to the residence in
M° conjunction with the business.
4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually.
S. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business.
b. There shall be no noisq emitted from the home connected with the
R business which is audible to abutting residences.
. 7. There shall be no outdoor storage of materials, vehicles, or
products on the promises. Indoor storage of material or products
shall not exceed the limitations :.,.*sed by the provisions of the
Building, Fire. Health, and Housing Codes.
I. Th.'s approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final
decision date noted below.
E 0. PROCEDURE
1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City
v Hall and mailed to:
,1
XX The applicant 6 owners
XX Owners of record within the required distance
XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
EX Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON July 28., 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL
IS FILED.
S. Appeal:
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be
filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given
and sent.
F
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. July 28, 1986
le-
{ 7`ICE OF DECISION — HOP 15=86 — 'PAGE.2
x
4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of
Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Blvd., PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223,
639-4171.
OOP 00-
PR RED BY Deborah A. Stuart. Assistant Planner DATE
Oli
lizabeth IY Senior Planner DATE APPROVED
(DA$:sb/dj38)
f
;NOTICE-OF DECISION — HOP15-66 — 'PAGE 3':-
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
.'' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENaa oF:
July 21, 1986 AGENDA ITEM N: �• cp"
DATE SUBMITTED: July 14, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Director's Decision
HOP 14-86 Joel Rutledge PREPARED BY: immunity vPLD nr _
REQUESTED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
to
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is the Notice of Decision for HOP 14-86, approval of a request by
Joel Rutledge for a Home occupationPermit for a wholesale auto distributing
business on property zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre maximum) ,
located at 12662 SW Karen) .
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
n�.
is Approve as written.
2. Remove from consent agenda and set for review on a date certain by Council.
w
SUGGESTED -ACTION
' '00ro `as:written. .
r-
_-�*=�:_ -amu ,�.. ��...:�. = - - •:�:.,..... � �; -
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
HOP 14-86
APPLICATION; Request by Joel Rutledge for a Home Occupation Permit for a
wholesale auto distributing business on property zoned R-12 (Residential, 12
units per acre maximum). Location: 12662 SW Karen (Bellwood Terrace
Condominiums). (WCTM 2S1 4AA lot 90000).
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of
Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The
findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted
below.
A. FINDING OF FACT
1. Background
In September, 1968, an application for a zone change from
Washington County S-R to R-7PD Planned Residential (2C 11-68)
Bellwood Terrace Planned Development Subdivision was approved.
Phase I and Phase II consist of 107 single family units, 6
duplexes and 33 apartment units for a total of 152 units (SDR
34-80). In January, 1981, a Site Design Review application (SOR
- 34-80) was approved. It primarily concerned carport construction
and parking space requirements. In August, 1980, a temporary use
approval was granted for a temporary mobile home sales office for
- 30 days (TU 5-80).
2. Vicinity Information
Properties in all directions aro zoned and developed R-4.5
(Residential, 4.5 units per acre maximum).
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
There is a 900 square foot home on the property. The applicant
proposes to use 25 square feet for the business. The applicant
will occupy the remainder of the home. The business as proposed
will not occupy more than 25% of the tome. The applicant arranges
for the off-premise repair and sale of automobiles via a telephone
at his residence. No business-related automobiles will be stored
stored at consigned or rental lots.
on the property. They will be
4. Agency and NPO Comments
NPO N7 will be notified of the Director's decision and will be
given the right to appeal.
111- CE OF DECISION -:HW 14-86 PAGE 1
B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 16.142 of the
Tigard Municipal Code.
C. DECISION
Home Occupation Permit HOP 14-86 is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. There will be no paid employees working in the home in conjunction
with the business who are not residents of the home.
2. There shall be no more than one vehicle garaged at the residence
used in conjunction with the business.
3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in
conjunction with-the business.
4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually.
S. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business.
6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the
business which is audible to abutting residences.
7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final
decision date noted below.
D. PROCEDURE
1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City
Hall and mailed to:
XX The applicant 6 owners
S% Owners of record within the required distance
X1 The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
XX Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 7-21-86 UNLESS AN APPEAL
IS FILED.
3. Appeal:
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance
with-Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community
`- Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be
filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given
r and sent.
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. 7-21-86
NOTICE VF "DECISION = HOP 14=56 - PAGE 2
s
4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of
( Tigard Planning Departmll
Department. Tigard City Ha , 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223,
639-4171.
1
PREPARED 81: Deborah A. Stuart, Asst. Planner
DATE
4DAA4POVED
Elizabeth A. Newton, Seniorlanner
(DAS:cn/80)
1
i
PAGE 3
'?W=E OF .DECISION — HOP 14-96 —
_ s
F
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: July 21, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: •�0..
DATE SUBMITTED: July 11, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION:
ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE: Director's Decisions
M 5-86 Henry Paetel PREPARED BY: Community npvPt V=nr
REQUESTED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
Attached is a Notice of Derision for Henry Paetel, M 5-86, approval of a
request to adjust two parcels of 0.93 and 0.24 acres into two parcels of
0. 13 and 0.74 acres each on property zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per
acre maximum), and located at 10342 SW McDonald.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Approve as written
2. _Call up for review at a date set by Council
s
SUGGESTED ACTION
mkt ; �FPra�e as written.
4.,
CITY OF TIGARD
NOTICE OF DECISION
r Lot Line Adjustment M 5-86
APPLICATION: Request by Henry Paetel to adjust two parcels of 0.93 and 0.24
acres into two parcels of 0.43 and 0.74 acres each on property zoned R-12
(Residential, 12 units per acre maximum) and located at 10342 SW McDonald
(WCTM 2S1 11BB, lots 1500 and 2100).
DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of
Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The
findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted
below.
A. FINDING OF FACT
1, Background
No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning
Division for the subject property.
2. Vicinity Information
Properties to the north are zoned R-3.5 (Residential, 3.5 units
per acre maxim). Properties in all other directions are all
zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre maximum).
3. Site Information and Proposal Description
There is presently a 1527 square foot residence, a 508 square foot
detached garage and a 616 square foot accessory building on tax
3 lot 2100. Tax lot 1500 is vacant. The applicant proposes to
enlarge the vacant parcel (tax lot 1500) by adding approximately
20,448 square feet of the developed parcel (tax lot 2100) to it.
Tax lot 2100 will be reduced to an 88.78 x 276.05 foot rectangle
(18,022 square feet) containing the three buildings. The three
buildings conform with the setback requirements of the R-12 zoning
district. The applicant wishes to sell the resulting vacant lot
` in order to reduce the amount of property he must care for.
4. Agency and NPO Comments
The Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has no
objections to it.
The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has the
following comments:
a. The applicant shall execute a non-remonstrance agreement for
a future LID to improve McDonald Street.
NOTICE OF DECISION - M 5-86 PAGE 1
ATkoea`«,. —
_
.tea
�r
,tea,
_
b. Additional right-of-away shall be dedicated to the public
along the SW McDonald Street frontage to increase the
might-of-way to 3o feet from the centerline.
M Y Y
C. Applicant shall connect with City sewer by paying the
required inspection fee and obtaining a connection permit
from the Building Division.
B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The proposal is consistent with the approval standards given in Section
18.162.060 of the Tigard Municipal Code. No additional lot will be
created by the lot line adjustment and both lots will exceed the minimum
lot size requirements for the R-12 zoning district (3,050 square feet).
The developed lot will maintain the appropriate setbacks. Also, the
dimensions of the parcels will allow for efficient redevelopment of the
properties at a later date.
C. DECISION
The Planning Director approved M5-86 subject to the following conditions:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO
RECORDING THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY.
2. The revised legal descriptions for the now parcels shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Director PRIOR TO
RECORDING. After approval, the City shall record the documents
and forward a copy to the applicant unless other arrangements are
made with the Director.
3. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the public along SW
McDonald Street frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet
from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be
tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by
County Survey 020,187. The dedication document shall be on City
forms and approved by the Engineering Section.
e. Applicant shall connect to City sewer by paying the required
Inspection fee and obtaining a connection fee from the Building
Division.
S. The applicant shall execute a non-remonstrance agreement for a
future LID to improve McDonald Street.
6, This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the date of
the final decision.
{ 8.
M 5-86 PAGE 2
NOTICE'OF .OECISIOq -
r
D. PROCEDURE
1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City
k Hall and sailed to:
]CIC The applicant 6 owners
III m_ Owners of record within the required distance
IDC The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization
XX Affected governmental agencies
2. Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON July 21,, 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL
IS FILED
3. Appeal:
Any party to the decision way appeal this decision in accordance
with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community
Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be
filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given
and sent.
The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. July 21, 1986
4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of
Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW
Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171.
�Y. `•
PROARED BY: bosh A. Stuart, Assistant Planner DATE
Wil A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DTE APPROVED
_ (cnM
r
wOTZt OF;DECISION - M 5-86 -- PAGE. 3 -
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Randy Clarno, Jerry McNurlin July 9, 1986
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director,
Community Development
SUBJECT: Road Jurisdiction
The attached Resolution and Order transfers jurisdiction of a number of roads
to Tigard. Please note that this was effective upon passage, not after 30
days. Please take immediate steps to notify appropriate personnel.
Jerry, you need to adr these streets to your Crew chief worK programs.
(WAM:br50)
cc`: Chief Lehr, TPD
IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FI L E ID
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Jul 3
la
In the Matter of Surrender of ) RESOLUTION AND ORDER
Jurisdiction of portions of j
County Roads to the City of
Tigard, Oregon. ) County Road No.
This matter having been considered by the Board of County Commissioners
at its regular meeting of July 1, 1986; and
It appearing to the Board that the City of Tigard, Oregon has requested
of this Board its surrender of Jurisdiction of a portions of certain County
Roads as described and depicted in attached Exhibits "A" and "B", attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein,n, now under the Jurisdiction
of Washington County, Oregon; and
It appearing to the Board that said roads lie within the boundaries of
the City of Tigard and that Jurisdiction over and across said roads should be
transferred properly to the City of Tigard; and
It appearing to the Board that by its Resolution and Order No. 86-50,
dated May 13, 1986, it duly required the setting of a time and place of public
hearing on said request and required that notice of said hearing be posted
' ( pursuant to law; and
It appearing to the Board that in accordance with said Resolution and
Order, notice was duly given and a public hearing was held on this matter on
the 1st day of July 1986, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in Room 402 of the
Washington County Administration Building, Hillsboro, Oregon; and
It appearing to the Board that at said public hearing the Board heard
the matter and considered objections and testimony offered by all persons
interested n the proposed surrender of the Jurisdiction, and the Board having
considered this matter found that the best interests of Washington County
} would be served by granting said request; the Board hereby
FINDS AND DETERMINES that it is necessary, expedient and in thi best
interests of Washington County to surrender Jurisdiction to the City of
Tigard, Oregon, those certain roads as hereinabove described; and it is hereby
RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Jurisdiction of the County over said roads
as hereinabove described and responsibility for the maintenance, construction
and repair and the full and absolute Jurisdiction over said road for all
purposes of repair, construction, improvement and levy and collection of
assessments thereof shall vest in the City of Tigard, Oregon, and the City
shall then have the same control, power and Jurisdiction of the road or
Portions thereof as are by its Charter and the laws of the State of Oregon
given or granted over any of the public streets and alleys of said City; and
it is further
_
r
RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Director of Land Use and Transportation of
Washington County, Oregon be, and hereby is ordered to amend as necessary, the
.s
official records of Washington County, Oregon, to indicate the surrender of
jurisdiction as herein above described; and it is further
a RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk of the County Board of
Commissioners, be, and hereby is authorized and directed to forward a
certified copy of this Resolution and Order to the City of Tigard, Oregon, as
due notice of the surrender jurisdiction.
DATED this 1st day of July, 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONERS
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
t�a.„_..�...�•
Cha 1 man
co n ecretary
Approved as to fora
Asst. County Counse ' 4� AYE NAY ABSENT
Date' HAYS
2638agl/d KIL.L.PACK —�
MEEK
MYLLENBECK a�-
ROGERS —'-= ---
r
EXHIBIT "A"
1. County Road No. 1602
(S.W. Franklin Street lying between S.W. 66th Avenue and S.W. 69th
Avenue). All of County Road No. 1602, in the Northeast one-quarter of
Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M.
2. County Road No. -1600
(S.W. 68th Avenue lying between S.W. Franklin Street and S.W. 6onzaga
Street). That portion of County Road No. 1600 lying between the
beginning point and that portion previously transferred in County Road
No. 2379 (T/J) in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M.
3. County Road No. 1544
(S.W. 69th Avenue lying between S.W. Clinton Street and S.W. Hampton
Street). All of County road No. 1544 lying in the Southeast
one-quarter of Section 36, TIS, RIW, W.M. and the Northeast one
of Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M.
4. S.W. 66th Avenue (Unnumbered County Road)
(S.W. 66th Avenue lying between a point 200 feet southerly of S.W.
Clinton Street and vacated S.W. Yarns Street). That portion of S.W.
66th Avenue, maintained by Washington County through an agreement with
the Oregon Department of Transportation as approved by Minute Order No.
69-104, dated April $, 1969 and Minute Order No 80-95, dated February
19, 1980, excepting therefrom any portion that has been acquired by the
Oregon Department of Transportation thru subsequent agreements, in the
Southeast one-quarter of Section 36, TIS, R1W, W.M. and the East
one-half of Section 1, T2S, RIW, W.M.
5. S.W. 67th Avenue (Unnumbered County Road)
(S.W. 67th Avenue lying between I-5 and a point 150 feet northerly and
S.W. Clinton Strec:). That portion of S.W. 67th Avenue, maintained by
Washington County through an agreement with the Oregon Department of
Transportation as approved by Minute Order No. 69-104, dated April 8,
1969 and Minute Order No 80.95, dated February 19, 1980, excepting
therefrom any portion that has been acquired by the Oregon Department of
reements, in the Southeast one
Transportation thru subsequent ag -quarter
of Section 36, Tis, R1W, W.M.
6. Unnumbered County Roads
(S.W. 68th Avenue lying between S.w. Clinton Street and S.W. Atlanta
Street; S.W. Baylor Street lying between S.W. 69th Avenue and S.W. 66th
Avenue). All of S.W. 68th Avenue and S.W. Baylor Street as maintained
by Washington County through an agreement with the Oregon State
Department of Transportation as approved by Minute Order No. 80-95 dated
February 19, 1980, excepting therefrom any portion that has been
acquired by the Oregon Department of Transportation thru subsequent
agreements, in Section 36, TIS, R1W, Washington County, Oregon.
. PAGE 1 OF 4
t
EXHIBIT "A"
7. County Road No. 1522
(S.W. Baylor Street lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. 69th Avenue,
S.W. 69th Avenue lying between S.W. Baylor Street and S.W. Clinton
Street and S.W. Clinton Street lying between 69th Avenue and S.W. 68th
Avenue). All of County Road No. 1522 lying between the beginnin point
and that portion previously transferred in County Road No. 2593 �T/J) in
the Southeast one-quarter of Section 36, TIS, R1W, W.M.
S. County Road No. 245
(S.W. 72nd Avenue lying between a point 300 feet north of S.W. Baylor
Street, and a point 400 feet south of S.W. Elmhurst Street). That
portion of County No. 24o n2379tween(T/J)that(southrtion line of Lotu15
transferred in County Road N
Fruitland Acres) and the terminus of C.R. No. 1092 in the S.E.
one-quarter of Section 36, TIS, R1W, W.M. and the N.E. one-quarter of
Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M.
9. County Road No. 1092
(S.W. 72nd Avenue lying betwoen a point 50 feet northerly of S.W.
Beveland Street and a point 400 feet southerly of S.W. Elmhurst
Street). Aoi of County Road No. 1092, in the Northeast one-quarter of
Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M.
10. County Road No. 1922
(S.W. Hermoso Way lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Beveland
Street; S.W. Beveland Street lying between S.W. 72nd Avenue and the
westerly line of HermosoPark). All ofW County Road No. 1922 in the
North one-half of Section
,
M.
11. County Road No. 472
(S.W. 72nd Avenue lying betw 4n a point 270 feet northerly of S.W.
of
Beveland Street and a point 880 feet southerly). That portion ne County
Road No. 472 lying between the beginning point and the south line of Lot
13, Beveland, in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 1, T2S, R11W, W.M.
12. County Road No. 900
(S.W. Naeve Street lying between State Highway No. 99W and S.W. 109th
Avenue, and S.W. 109th Avenue lying between S.W. Naeve Street and S.W.
Highland Drive). All that portion of County Road No. 900, except that
portion previously vacated, in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 10,
T2S, R1W, M.M.
13. County Road No. 1415
(S.W. 109th Avenue lying between S.W. Naeve Street and a point 1200
feet, more or less, north of said intersection). All of County Road No.
1415, in the S.E. one-quarter of Section 10, T2S, R1W, W.M..
�v -
PAGE 2 OF 4 r_:
EXHIBIT "A"
14. County Road No. 1366
(S.W. 108th Avenue lying between S.W. Durham 1366,and point
nthe to1900 feet,
more or less, south. All of County Road Na
east
one-quarter of Section 15, T2S, R1W, W.M.
15. County Road No. 857
County Roam No. 727
(S.W. Sattler Street lying between S.W. 100th Avenue and S.W. Hall
Blvd.). That portion of County Road 857 lying between angle point No. 1
and the Terminus Point, and all of County Road No. 727, in the South
one-half of Section 11, T2S, R1W, W.M.
16. County Road No. 865
Street). AllW. 100th venue of County gRoad No. 865, IInrthekNor hwestand
one-quarternofd
Section 11, T2S, R1W, W.M.
17. County Road No. 1290
(S.W. Ross Street lying between S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. 81st Avenue;
S.W. gist Avenue lying between S.W. Ross Street and S.W. Bonita Road).
All of County Road No. 1290, in the west one-half of Section 12, T2S9
R1W, W.M.
18. County Road No. 1042
(S.W. 74th Avenue lying between S.W. Bonita Road and S.W. Durham Road).
All of County Road No. 1042, excluding that portion previously
transferred in County Road No. 2379 (T/J) in the east one half of
Section 12 and the North one-half of Section 13, T2S, R1W, W.N.
19. County Road No. 933
(S.W. 79th Avenue lying between S.W. Durham Road and S.W. Bonita Road).
All of County Road No. 933, in the west one-half of Section 12, T2S,
R1W, W.M.
20. County Road No. A-138
(S.W. 74th Avenue lying between S.W. Fanno Creek Place and S.W. Durham
Road and S.W. Fanno Creek Place lying between S.M. 74th Avenue and S.N.
Upper Boones Ferry Road and S.W. Upper Boone's Ferry Road lying between
S.W. fano Creek Place and S.W. 72nd). That portion of County Road No.
A-138 lying between angle point No. 2 of said CR No. A-138 and the
beginning point of CR No. 922 lying in the Northeast one-quarter of
Section 13, T2S, R1W, W.M.
u
PAGE 3 OF 4
r
EXHIBIT "A"
21. County Road No. 1439
(S.W. Tiedeman Avenue lying between S.W. Tigard Street and S.W.
Greenburg Road). All of County Road No. 2439 in Section 35, T1S, R1W,
W.M. in Washington County, Oregon.
22. County Road No. 934
(S.W. 135th Avenue, lying between S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Scholls
Perry Road). Thatportion of County Road No. 934 :ging between the
north line of Obrs Heights, a subdivision of record in Washington
County, and the Terminus Point of said C.R. No. 937 in the North
one-half of Section 4, US, R1W, W.M. and Section 33, T1S, R1W, W.M.
crdesc/s
PAGE 4.OF 4
z
r�
■■■■=,
M00
�1� ol
�. POO
04
WIN00�, ■.ia
a100
ONE��
y
1
tic1i� ■ -
111
►' IRS Us R
a�
♦ ``, i
ins
son um
� r���� �� ♦��•�' � � • — �V\\fit\��\�� ,\\ s���
1
All
its 11 ol sit"
10
ire
AG£ 11111
Sol
A�b1s +
1 �
s
C
c -u
� e
�a
i•
Li
.. � �� �■�,�■ ■ �■� Ifs
HE
TM
on Ilultti►1�
mass
Van
In
pP , 9 �.•..■. .i� ,..tit ■ 111101
sj man Q
mt ���llllNlill■ .
s ,fit♦ � w w
\\\\\ son _
�,�►�,.'��Q ■li �// / X111 B �,'
�, .•�s�■■�•,, �, 'rye �
:�lii■11f�► �,. � 11111 n>,f,\�l I�l� ■ ■ten►.. ■
Fr �w
PAGE 3 of 6 EXHIBIT
�y
1. i�•
1 �
1 !
I
. _— " 111'►�� ��. �
iia+ t-r►/ '�_'"'�
• ® y
t
summons
lost
■�t1► - rr.
KIM
110
-,
■ ■�■ Its: .
IVA
WIN
' r
- - :1111 ' ■ � ► ::� � .� .•��,,,
COUNTY ROAD — TRANSFER OF
�;.. -. JURISDICTION
7
City of TIGARD
#.e
;�' -�D �'x' •wOrnM
°Pto� Proposed Transfer wwwwww
s =" City Limits
r-
VICINITY MAP
a �
w
M �
P ,
IRLr ^ ice... •,`
r1ern" �� • •�• '� ., •�w�sRuuc[''/iluec ••.�
�• a �� t • �' ``li '�
/ I—
' • w Nr. i ., IMS
' s sal . � �� o y . •.• 1 „ ! , , � 3A
n Ulm
�: �* ► : iii
PAGE 6 of 6EXHIBIT, B
} CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
>i
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
AGENDA OF: July 21, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: L) �rj
DATE SUBMITTED: July 9, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: NPO 1 and 2
Appointments PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton
REQUESTED BY
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: Gy` CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
At the July 8, 1986 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission held a public
hearing to consider recommending two individuals for membership to NPO N2
(presently combined with NPO Ni) and NPO N1. Daniel R. Gott appeared before
the Commission seeking membership to NPO *i. Patricia Taylor Cantrell seeking
membership to NPO N 2, but was not able to appear before the Commission.
Because there were no members in NPO N2, the Council consolidated NPO M1 and
NPO M2 into one NPO for membership purposes in the summer of 1985. The
Commission voted to recommend appointment of Daniel R. Gott to NPO N1 and
Patricia Taylor Cantrell to NPO #1 02). Attached are copies of the
individual interest applications.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Accept the Planning Commission recommendation appointing Daniel R. Gott
to NPO N1 Patricia Taylor Cantrell to NPO #1 (/12).
2. Deny the appointments.
SUGGESTED ACTION
Accept the Planning Commission recommendation appointing Daniel R. Gott to
NPON1 and Patricia Taylor Cantrell to NPO N1 (2). Their terms shall expire on
7/21/90.
�` (EAN:br2645P)
CITYOF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION
NAME: i ,� •C. UATf: a;� -p
ADDRESS (RES.);/ �t�C RES. PHONE:
ADDRESS (BUS. ): BUS. PHONE:
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: .SG d e1�A-V
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: r
7`' .1QJ %C�Gr'- .LlUrG6 CrA7��•V.5M 1 c� �'D �• ��
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND:
L ' 3
�vE /i so •4 /
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO A PLICANTS ONLY)?
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ��% r'v ~'u`(A-),
j.�Jtly/�J�t7 i•J A �E"iY��i��!/�� o-J•'-y C� iSSsrE
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: A!e/F �„ •r "- j
OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS):`%y � .L
J IL V>
.,47441
DA
i •,V
BOARDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: 9 �! i•c �
` ------------- ------------------^-------
----------------------- --- ----------------------
Date Received at City Hall Date Inte-rviewt
gDate Appointed Board. Committer, ar NI"
Inside City Out s ide City
(0346p)
�L�•GI VtU
• 4 H86
�G C11Y Of TIGARD
CITY OF TIGARD CITIZEN CONNITTEE INTEREST APDL, CATION
DATE: ,2r•'n/� �.�t-�'•L
NONE: A �
T/G�9RD RES. PHONE:
ADDRESS (RES.):
US. PHONE: Cj 2
ADDRESS (BUS- ): /,��i R S- S W T-
�s�• ..�d ,2D S�F/E'k 5
succEs•rED BY:
LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: _�Q.�s.�==s 7_
3 5
1,41 S u.�w+,E r'
WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? /
NCE
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
�0A --
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: f ^�
iIle
e LJ.F
NOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM'. S
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?
O1� N
PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: .�R J
r�
N � -
ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES:
e ,/G
OTHER INFORMATION {GENERAL REMARKS):
•IGPTi9.A�
*1661
------------
BOARDS. COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN:
------------- ------ Date lntdrvirved --
Date Received st City full -------------------------------
-BOa.rd,, t;o�maittec. elf N1'U.
Uatr<`.Appointed Outside City
11 ide City
(03
. . . :.
ZiN
A ,y ..,..sw+..x.�
a
MEMORANDUM z-1
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Mayor and City Council July 11, 1986
FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Council Meetings Calendar
Mon. 7/14 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Sat. 7/19 Study Session at 9:00 a.m. — 3C Workshop
Mon. 7/21 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Mon. 7/28 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Mon. 8/4 Executive Session at 6:30. CA review. Deadline for filing
Mayoral position petitions.
Mon. 8/11 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Mon. 8/18 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Mon. 8/25 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00. Council position petition
filing deadline.
Mon. 9/1 NO MEETING. HOLIDAY. CIVIC CENTER CLOSED.
Mon. 9/8 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Mon. 9/15 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
Sat. 9/13 Comunity Services Director Assessment Center.
Mon. 9/22 Study Session at 6:30, Council at 7:00
11/4 CC position election.
11/8-11/11 League of Oregon Cities Conference, Eugene.
LW:bs130
- -
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY (,::7 AGENDA OF: July 21, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: 1 �O _
DATE SUBMITTED: July 3, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: PC issuance of Final
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Authorize Mayor Order No. 85-22
and Deputy Recorder to execute PREPARED BY: John Haqman
Conser San Sewer Compliance Agreement REQUESTED BY: Community Development
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: sir CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
1. The proposed sanitary sewer extension is located at SW Pacific Highway
between SW Durham Road and SW Naeve Street and is to be done in
conjunction with development of a mini-warehouse (storage) facility and
other on-site construction work.
2. The attached Compliance Agreement and Performance Bond have been submitted
by the developer, as is required, to assure completion of public
improvement (sewer) work.
3. Construction plans have been issued subject to Council acceptance of this
sanitary sewer agreement and bond. All fees are paid.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Authorize the Mayor and Deputy Recorder to execute the Compliance Agreement,
for the Conser Sanitary Sewer Extension, in behalf of the City and, also,
accept the Performance Bond.
JH:sb/dj32
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
f COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY u
AGENDA OF: _ July 21, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: 1+
DATE SUBMITTED: July 3, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council approved the
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Carnahan's Subdivision Compliance Agreement and
Addition Subdivision Extension Conditionally accepted the L)roiect
Agreement — Authorize Citv Execution KRes #85-42)
_ PREPARED BY: John Hamman � Yc
REQUESTED BY: Community Development
DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:
POLICY ISSUE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
1. The Council conditionally accepted the public improvement work performed
within Carnahan's Addition Subdivision (by Resolution #85-42); said
project is located north of SW North Dakota Street and west of SW 106th
Avenue.
2. Said "conditional acceptance" meaning: final acceptance subject to
completion of (certain) incomplete items and, also, continued maintenance
of completed items.
3. Now, though progress is being made, whereas all of the conditions have yet
to be met, it is necessary to extend the previously executed Agreement to
assure full and final performance of all work.
4. Subsequently, the developer has requested City acceptance of the proposed
Extension Agreement; City staff endorses Council acknowledgment thereof.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
SUGGESTED ACTION
Authorize Mayor and Deputy Recorder to execute the Extension Agreement for
Carnahan's Addition Subdivision, in behalf of the City.
JH:sb/dj32
c.
R
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON �.J •'
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council July 19, 1986
FROM: loreen Wilson, Recorder
SUBJECT: Employee Training Request
As you are aware, the Word Processing/Office Manager was hired 6/1/86. One of
the tasks assigned to this individual is the implementation of the word
processing computer upgrade this fall. Consistent with the comprehensive
computer training plan which Council approved on July 14, 1996, the WP system
manager will need to attend a software programming class given by Wang. She
will then take the lead in implementing the cross-training program in-house.
This class is offered by Wang once each quarter and the next available class
is scheduled for Friday, Jully?5. 1986. If the WP system manager waits for
the next offered class, it will be during the anticipated start-up time for
the new system. Therefore, I would recommend approval of the training request
In the amount of$195.00. This is less in cost than anticipated originally.
lw/3955A
m 4 31t
• - CITY OF T117ARD
r
tt 11it .t( .
iz
:uli<rt. t1, ro p ,ti s, ftrlstr.•U. A cop, .rill :i. sr� �r .•i. �• y. 1 tic
I)Ar(: Ur krAJUr..S1
Vendor No. : �
PAYAKU. 'ro: 1 Y7/7 request attend
IX j Employer required attend
94=
For c �k run of
( j Mai -heck P.0
{ j Not i f y , zwh,.(( ready
Vendor No. : Vendor No. :
PAYABLE TO:�- PAYABLE TO:
sazaszzzaztezzsazaaazaaxaxaaaxaaxaaazoa=xax=aaxmas_=ssasaaasxszsaaasoasaaaz:aaaz
Title or Program: + `
Institution or organization
Registration Deadline W-" Training Wates From: To:
De - be the purpoSe:
;tde WC�ID55C
Is this related to 1 X] current position ( ) reasonable promotion or transfer?
Explain:
TRAINING COSTS: to be advanced ( ) to be reimbursed after attendance
Account Nc. Amount
Registration or tuition.........................
Books.. ... .. ... ... ._.+._
Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.)....
Lodging.........................................
Per Diem........................................
Other:
Total $ Igg7 DD
ssssssssss:sssssssassssssssssasssasssa:sasassssssssassss:ssssssssssasssssssssss
Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of
education/training policies are not net, I may be required to reimburse the
City for any expendituvr made omy b half , 7
Employee Signature:-.%AV-&.eZL ;� __ _ Date
Appropriation balance:_ Manager:_[ ] approved ( J disapproved
Dept. Head: [ j approved ( j disapproved (explain):
a
Finance Director:
# g a xr ate- ci
f -�
uc
4 AC
T ► - •p- 4 n rc n T
a- is CIE
p
CY _ cY
V
y G 1 J
+r #4 r 4
eti
Y
C
H 's
t. �
..w
o
S9 M
H
U 6 �1 ;
VN
W
' 3
o f f Q 3 5 e
{
Q J Y
a aG N V) d E t` F � C2 w a p �r
�•� it
y 1 i
_ r,
IV
in
Ir
dj -q 'llp Cc
J
J 42
l
r .
CO,
M
fu
w
•
�U � � • - � yy yy oa} t} ~gg �i
a • • � � � � i i i i yYs3�� i O �
a 1 • • • f O 1 • D• • O �
CAF ':AL nYyn=:t:
4. : . Co.- r a r V - BOL t+oe 11
.Z Faln ClayeCll:lp,^,*-rIC,(
y . X'C*amt R.Iverside t.1rai = .
. � :ke_ball cCjur,
:a(I r, 1C � . .•T,f,E� iris
�.,• _ .
7 i r;r, �- >: r r.: FS
_ . _(.: . . . .G
_ j
CJ
4 , w f -ad flo�, 3 Er.:al . .
71-4-1 f.. . l C--r: and -,a 2 . f � . .. O` . ♦'_ , . `. Cltt• c•tinter acres_ paging.
C. GIF `fence a eener y.
D. 1 ?erpretive Center .
Y,. E . ri tall picnic tables and trash
:v. Gr e�-nway Park Trails
F. Outline con.pleLed system.
&. Frio!- it.izF C:F prole:' -
C-, gra l r, sw - Fina, Anc fi4lc� and
lrlc
ar,c€
pr oo•air..
V. St reet Pea,;-�;,t r ,an-bike Pat r..
s
A_ Qu't i.i rre conn T�Led _y t,en..
pr for it-izt- CIP projc-ct
V: sandy Helfrich
all r.e t:1C-k 1 C l rt t:l ar,6 C
Ci l .
. - _
r�glo _r• rr,: l: ar. fp:
= t .may
.it of i
f � cniZ 13nc
a iner
cart W'_. z;:rf�clr.
r.F.3 :DGr ( r,, -
_ art''3�'�_ .
enc r�_n � .r. t . .< . .. .
,'-• f
_ _"= i•.��': r6r.cf!'- l.' �' � � r. ..: . '"! moi : •!
v6-t .r:17tC. c.. aL•• t:C
r=�ar•: ;s:.
cn� city's role lr. r ,e: vinc
f4t ailoilfE. e .g. . bird neF- ir,,,,
- ?.: =a-v. ca. a1oc
A described above, CIp pro3ect� Mitr, lllu=
and costs. This will be used a8 a basis CI"r' f'Ir�r. aria
alio as a service club catalog for vai�nt •_er �,. -.Fans .
x,
' J
3 S (((
-
r
Park Board Members
Cba,aaixw of commerce.Ad Soo Committee.
on After Seal Pte=
From: Pat Biggs
is a MM of the results of the awyey W ch the School District
sant to all ele mtary school Pu=ts this spring. we were is:terested
the Swmts' perceptims of utwthgr there is a need for an after achobl
dal=e p�o WM in their child's school, even ttnugh many P� resPoc i
app tly have no need themselves for such a program. Elementary PrinciPals
dis u m ed the issue early in the a d=1 Year when they contb=od to
ad
perceive the need for aftaac scbaol Programs.
At tt %ay 10 s daool Board meetia�g, r q resentatives of the Washington
OMMta +�
r y VMM will prom* a prMosal to the Board to start taco► after
school programs this fall in Charles jr. Tigax+d and ltaslatin Elementary
They win Pmt a proposed budget along with otbw pertinent
iatforpae�ti,on.
TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J
NEEDS ASSESSMENT RESULT'S
AFTERSCHOOL CHILD CARE
JUNE, 1986 +
1. flow many children do you have attending school?
144 Kindergarten 18%
133 lot Grade 17%
145 2nd Grade 19%
143 3rd Grade 18%
93 4th Grade 12%
78 5th Grade 10%
47 6th Grade 6%
783 TOTAL
2. What arrangements have you made for your children after
school?
38 None. They are on their own.
93 A neighbor watches them.
55 They are enrolled in an afterschool child care program.
70 Profit 4 Non—Profit
's
18 An adult watches them.
18 An adult relative watches them.
26 An older brother or sister watches them.
263 No arrangements are necessary. A parent is home.
3. If you have had to sake special arrangements for your
child, are you satisfied with the arrangements you have
made?
243 Yes (71%) 100 No (29%)
4. Would you like to see an afterschool child care program
-
located in your child's school?
396 Yes (92%) 33 No (8%)
5. If that were not possible, would you be willing to have
your child bussed to another school for the program? 4
171 Yes (45X) 210 No (55X)
6. If there were to be a convenient afterachool child care
program located in the district, how willing would you be to
support this?
55 I'd sign my child up immediately. (13X)
249 I'd consider the program, depending on cost. (60X)
109 I'd continue with present arrangen6ats. (27x)
7. $5,00 per day is an average afterachool charge for a program
running from dismissal time until 6:00 p.m. and including snacks,
fully supervised care, activities, transportation, and occasional
field trips.
Would you be willing to pay that amount for such a program?
316 You (80X) 78 No (20X)
TOTAL NUMBER Of SURVEYS RETURNED: 503
to -
_ AFTERSCHOOL DAYCARE SURVEY
PARENT COMMENTS
JUNE, 1986
Please consider kindergarten children. .
As with most structured childcare programs, 6:00 is not late
enough for my work schedule. It is unfortunate that the
childcare needs of people who work something other than a
typical 9-5 day are not addressed. I would still be
interested in some sort of program that might be arranged
although I would have to find additional care.
I only work part-time--maybe one or two days a week!
If a summer schedule could be worked out that would also be
wonderful! I would be interested in paying extra for an
after-school tutor situation also.
I hope an afterschool program can be set up. Too many
children are going home to empty hoses. I don't believe,
however, that at $5.00 per day, per child, for afterschool
til 6 p.m. , you will get such of a response. It seems to me
that those in most need of this care will be unable to
afford this price.
This would only be on an occasional basis. If his
grandparents were not available to watch him after school, I
would consider an aft'erachool care program.
o fi
I think for younger children it's a fantastic idea for those
who are left with no arrangements for supervision after
school.
{' I have always felt there was a need for such a program using
school facilities. My only question would be regarding the
cost. T.f a child were to be there for only 1-2 hours after
school, would the charge still be $5.00 or would it be
prorated?
Not many babysitters are equipped to handle non-babies! . . .
1 Schools would be great! But $5.00 a day for supervision
from 2:30 to 5:00 is a little too expensive for me. Private
babysitters are charging $1.00 to $1.50 and sometimes the
extra cost is hard to handle. . . . Mould this care be
available in the summer too?
If there was an after school child care program, I could
- work more. I an very much in favor of this! It is so hard
to find dependable babysitters.
-2-
I really could have used this program when my children were
in the primary grades. I have ao need now, but feel you are
making a bi'g step in a good direction. Good luck.
I also have a 4-year old. It would be somewhat inconveuientt
to have to pick up one child at school and sake another stop
to pick up the 4-year old at a private daycare provider.
When the 4-year old .starts kindergarten_ then it would be :
much more feasible for me to consider afterschool child care
at the school.
The only problem I have with this program is that I work
later than 6, so does my husband. That would probably be
the only reason I wouldn't use the program.
We would be interested if this had been proposed when our
son was in earlier grades.
I think there is also a need for before-school care. Many
parents who work leave before school starts. We have to
have 1 1/2 hours of day care before school but are home
after school.
Could this service be used by someone who only needs care on
a ,part-time basis?
I would not need
thethis
programprogram
I would. as I I thinkhome,
this program=
u
ever had to use P
is a great idea.
This kind of care should provide several activity choices
for the older children like volleyball, basketball gases,
use of the school library and an area where homework can be
done if they want to work on it. We are looking for more
than a babysitting service, which is why I no longer use =
private daycare centers. They are such too limited for
older children.
I think this is a great idea. I would be interested on a
drop-in basis. I wouldn't need it every day.
I would also like to see a before-school program which we
feel is as important as an after-school program.
I don't need such a program but I think it's a great idea.
I would be interested in such a program on a part-time
basis--once or twice a week. There would also be tines it
would be used the. full week, but this would be infrequently.
This is not a_program I need at the present time. However,
I realize that other people are not as fortunate as I an in
my present position. Therefore, I would like to know of
nd. Thank you.
this program if and when it gets off the grou
-3-
t
i
t
i
I thl.nk this is a grand idea anB
many PTe �s.it materializes. It
would be ideal for many,
he 0
ccasional
I night be interested is Wouldrthatmbenaapossibility? s
basis--nothing regular. E
Ia addition to afterschool care, I would like to see the
ro rams for the kids of working
school provide some
s��ettsonths.
parents during the
I don't think I would use this service is my
current
if my shift at work changes, this would
situation. However, rest alternative for a
be beneficial-
full-time'
eneficial. full� think it •s a gtime
parent working
Although we do not need this type of program, I know of many
families who are and think it would be beneficial for all
concerned.
Th program rogram should also provide care
for ysay when school
is closed for conferences, teacher
since my child will be entering 6thlgaalike tohe valuesee somes
independence and time on his iallowing him to
activities nda endenttoward
child,
feelings, butwith supervision.
retain his P
I hope the district can arrange something like thi��ildtcare
would be very helpful for many families. Finding
is not easy to do.
Could this also include occasional care on a reservation
basis? work
is fall so I'm very
I do wish to go backast a pers nhwho did at one tinne provide
interested. Also,
now how great the need is.
after school care, I k
I think $5 is high. I presently have her is child care
center and it is =105 per talso Tany days uoff atno
des before
eextra
and/or after school care Plususe aftersc
ur case we only hool and vacation
charge. . . .10 o
days. The older the ehiidaend ah
monthly should be.
I
flat roe for
can see $5 for occasions
regulars.
For before and after sch000nthcar at This daycare
cenesr� I
currently pay f100 per icharge
i days, etc.
e? We both have to be at
Christmas break, spring
vacations,
Any chance of before-school car
work by ?•
-4-
My kids would only be there for maybe only as hour. Would
they pay $5.00 no matter
iaould the ahm.palsoaat only be
for after school? need
I feel this is a valid program for many in the school
district. . . .Also, when I did need a bab1steafter
r.school,
+
it was not for $5.00 per day. I Paid 00Per
houThe
;S.00 average is tohouldhb .The
If the costacouldnbelmore the
lower the average s
appropriate, many parents would take advantage of this
afterschool program.
Would I be allowed to use the childcare program
occasionally? (not on a regular basis)
What arrangements are fhrre forMonday-Fridays.dysrete school is
closed? We need c
I hate to see the school district get into the child care
business. It becomes easier and easier for parents to turn
over the responsibility of the child's walfareo the
time is the
school--from breakfast before school till supper
evenings.
Beginning next year. I would only need childcare for
approximately l hour a day for 1 child. Therefore. I'd like
to pay hourly and not per day.
work; having afterschool care
`., Although I do not Pr®.e:...
available would influence my future employment choices.
also know of many unaupaauldchildren
suchafter
progrnm. .and
l
would like to think pareatsw
hope this goes!
for
I am always here o home£ld but my alone. I havetis seenhtheytears and
those children whoo g
the fear and would hope this program would benefit them.
With the increase in working parents I feel this would be
estimulating or
ulLikewise
program
athletic. tnyrovevaluableto the children.
I would be interested in knowing the adult to * of children
ratio. possible age group differentiation-if any (for
application of appropriate activities) s as well as
credentials and suitability of persons considered for care
to be given-
Working parents would also need child care arrangements for
an hour or so before school starts. Has this been
considered?
eed of this service but if I needed
At present I an not in n
it this would be an excellent idea and most likely I would
use it.
I think it is a wonderful idea and would back it. There are,
too many children left oontheirsasthehyounger onesdren
need supervision as o
I think such a progra�oi$asempty'house�• aware of many
children who go home
ld
I feel there should be sa diVcoungooaridea ethat awould ibenefit
attending. I feel it i
a lot of parents and younger children who have to stay hose
alone after school.
would for
It is our hope than eratedrwith subsidypfunds mofsanyykind.
itself and not be p
I get a special rate for my older child since she is barely
there 1 hour.
I would be very interested in an afirstcgraderrogrearolladli�ick his up
also interested is it hool
i!
it might be less than $5.00 a day since I would p
an hour after school is Gu�Tentido have a day care asclnwould cern abeuleft
pulling children out of
f with no sitter during the summer months, spring vacation,
and Christmas.
I an a single parent on a limited income with no child
support.
I hate to think of my child alone--8 years old--for 8 hours
a day. The politics of today have made it nearly impossible
for a single parent not receiving child support to pay
J_# nearly as such a month for child day care as for shelter. I
hope you can help.
Although at present we are not is need of a y childcare
program. I know of the frustrations and agony
moan experieacs in finding good child care. I therefore
support an afterschool program.
This does not apply to ■e at the present time. I do thick
-
there is a very great need for this for other families,
however, and I'm sure those with children younger than mine
would welcome it.
I need before-school care as well as after-school care.
The program sounds good--I would be interested in the option
t be
to gartpifeitais nottatprogramimeiat my
interestedchild's school.
-6-
I presently do not need this service; however, that could
change and I would definitely like to see a program like
this started. I am aware of many children in the Tigard
schools who are simply on their own and would really like to
see that change.
I would be willing to consider this program if the children
were kept in the local school area (3 Tualatin schools) .
$5.00 per day is high cost to me and I would need to see
some flexibility in rates for 2nd, 3rd children (family
plan) and for time spent in the program (2:30-5:30 or
3:30-5:30) . It is a great idea. I wish you luck with it.
It would be great if activities would include those not
taught in schools such as gymnastics, dancing, musical
instruments, or marching.
While presently home every day, it looks as though I may
have to go to work in the fall. . . . A supervised program,
s badly needed.
approvedool Thanks, You have
I an interested in this
particular
areroeftma because there are
so many childrenarea who
unsupervised after school. I an home with my children, but
there are many children whose parents are not at home after
school. This could really be a great program!
= ,ynr summer - summer school program for 1/2 days?
Programs such as swimming, computer, sports programs, etc.
I've heard positive feedback from parents using a similar
program in other districts, and would be very interested in
receiving further information.
=5.00 a dayin not unreasonable,
but
ilot
when you
have three children
What about before school .program starting at 8:00 a.m.?
I'd be interested in such a program if it were available for
just those days when I couldn't be home after school. $5.00
for an hour or so would be too expensive.
Great idea. Full support.
Sats off to the District! Looks like there may be hope for
the U.S. in finally recognising the need of care for the
children in these changing times of the 2 parent or single
parent working family. Still there is the staggering cost
of day care, especially for many of us who have more than
one child; whether the need will be full time, part time, or
both for eiin care.districtwhich istakingstepst
vlyto oout Ism
pleased to lvo i
-7-
understand, address, and possibly put together a program for
the needs of the children and their parents! Thank you.
r I would like to see a graduated pay scale for part-tine
attendance.
'It would be nice to have a program such as this., as
occasionally an emergency comes up and quick alternative
daycare is needed by everyone.
I need morning arrangements too. It would cost too such.
Absolutely no childcare provided by schools!
This kind of child care would enable a lot more mothers to
return to work.
I will be working in the fallof
6caand chilrento are and from will be
a major problem, especially getting
childcare facilities-
1 think this is an excellent program for working parents.
could this service be used onanoccasional
2"drop in"
basis,
or must they be full tine? How
about
What about by the hour?
Would the program accept drop ins? on occasion I as not
home after school.
What about before school?
This is a good idea as long as there are good adult
supervised activities:
If I needed the program, I would probably use it.
I don't used this service naw--but maybe in a couple of
years I will.
Sight now, I have small children and an staying hose with
t%ea. However, in 4-5 years I think I will be very
interested in an afterschool child
ildcarheree program and I will
use one like the one you describe
It would not work for 30meunless I could get before-school
care, starting at
I would only need this serrvicTan vicea partight-time
be basis
for
now.
However, later a full-tim e
y.
Would this be opoen for drop-in use?
I feel there is a strong
eneed
affor
a program
suchhas this-to
In the two Years I ve ne e
be satisfied with either afterschool babysitters or private
day school care. Too few choices exist for quality
I'm aware of away children who'
childcare in this community.
are fending for themselves after school and really hope
something can happen000n to help
those children. Thanks
for the opportunity t
When my children were younger we relied on daycare center
'for child care. Would like
eato see schchildlcareation used for
afterschool care for those
Would not be willing to pay $5.00 for 3 kids--need specis.1
rate.
for next year my main interest would be before-schoolcare
and occasional afterschool since I'll work .6 time.
year after next I will have a child in kindergarten. Is
ith there any thought of extending
welcare
to edlpawgoodtidea.
Overall I think it
My child does not need after school care, but I'd like to
see this program started as I know of several children at
ages 8 and younger that go homeand stay alone after school.
If I needed it, I'd definitely take advantage of an after
school childcare program and feel confident in knowing there
was responsible supervision.
every
I any interesin ometimesaneedgchildbut not care. notrregularlyy of
the week. . . .I s
though.
Think it's a great idea.
Not working now but plan to when school starts next Sept.
I think it would be wonderful! When we started our daughter
in Metzger, she was in third grade and both parents worked.
We were hoping for a�eetbutgourlike
sonthis
willthen.
whea heShe
startslonger
needs afterschool cars,
school in a few years.
It's about time!
There is a great need for such a program, especially as a
face-saving device for kids 10 years old and older. I also
believe that schools should ntry
duringrent
summerout
their
wouldfacilities
for a profit after hours and
for the bussing? Thanks.
I wish this had been done long ago. It has been needed.
I Mould be so thrilled if there were a constructive,
well-supervised after school care program, I can't tell you
how much. Finding real high quality, or even low quality,
T
. -9_ [.
childcare in some areas is next to impossible. As a mingle
parent, good childcare and convenioat childcare is vital to
our emotional well-being and this year has been the worst
for finding that. Even daycare centers were at full
capacity so my kids wouldn't to there and in-hose sitters
often have 10+ kids to l adult! Areal situation! I would
only need afterschool care for about 2 hours so $5 is steep,
especi allysince I have another pre-schooler to prow JLU
"o care f
for. That*s $2.26 hour for the lot grader! Thanks.
I an presently working out of my home but if this should
change I feel this childcare program sounds great.
Presently have my son enrolled in a daycare program for
before and after school. Would need availa,ility before
school also. Bow would days off from school thast are not
holidays be handled? (teacher conference days, early
dismissals, snow days) Would the care center be closed
also? Would theta be any continuation of services,during
summer months?
}