Loading...
City Council Packet - 07/16/1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an SPECIAL MEETING AGENDAagenda item needs to sign on the appropriate STUDY AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, .. JULY 16 1986, 6.00 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TiGARD CIVIC CENTERof that agenda item. Visitor's agenda'items'are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to he 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. � . SPECIAL MEETING Call To Order and Roll Cali 2. CALL SPECIAL COUNCIL FLEETING - 7/22/86 - 6:30 PM o City Administrator 3. METZGER/WASHINGTON SQUARE ANNEXATION o City Administrator & City Attorney 4. METZGER CPO MEETING AGENDA' o City Administrator 5. BOUNDARY COMMISSION AGENDA o City Administrator 5.. ADJOURNMENT lw/3977A� COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 16, 1986 PAGE 1 a T I G_'A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L UTES JULY 16, 1986 - 6:10 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING MIN Councilors: Tom Brian, Carolyn ROLL CALL: Present:' Mayor Sohn Cook; Head 1' Eadon, and Valerie Johnson; City Staff: Irene Erto Chief; Cit Administrator: David Lehr, Librarian; Bob Jean, y Community Development Director; of Police; Bill Monahan, City Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Larsen Wilson, Deputy Recorder. 2, CALL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETINGS s ecial a City Administrator recommended Council call the following p Council meeting 7-22-86, 6:30 ' PM - ` Town Hall Conference .Room o Tuesday, otential Washington Square annexation purpose to receive p petition b. Consensus of Caurcil present was to call the special Council meeting. 3, METZGERiWASHINGTON SQUARE ANNEXATION City Administrator noted- the history of the annexation request and a: petition to annex to the stated over 500 citiz@ns had ,signed thin the northwest boundary City of Tigard. He continued to ;exp between the deviation between the petition and the agreed boundary cities of Beaverton and Tigard.care managemerstJhad contacted the Council that Washington q and wished to file a triple-majority petition for es under the take advantage of tax phasing with a tie to services ander the state statutes. b, City Attorney advised Council of the timing issues surrounding a petition being filed at this time. Administrator presented a copy of Beaverton Resolution No. C. City to uphold its' commitment to the 2721 which requested the City northwest boundary, Fie suggested Tigard should - know whaIf the t the property owners' preference was on the boundary dispute.choice by Tuesday, ?22-86, City did not know the property owners' the City would pull back and honor the original Council position the d, City Attorney stated that the agreement with Beavertonress strong boundary does state that if property owners exp feelings the cities will agree with the citizen desire. He . ry Commission would not be bound further noted thatthe Boundaby the cities' agreement since it is not tied to the comprehensive plan. Councilor Brian stated he wished there were time to meet e. Council. personally with the Beaverton City f f, Ms. Shirley Rowe, 10370 SW 90th Avenue, questioned how the 1, Councils set the boundary line. Page 1 - 'COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 16, 1986 r g. Staff and Council explained the, process of compromise the Councils worked can over the 'last several months. 4. METZGER CPO MEETING a. City Administrator explained the agenda of the CPO meeting noting the main thrust of the meeting is scheduled to be information and explanation with a quick review of the process of annexation. 5. BOUNDARY COMMISSION 7/24/86 a. City Administrator briefly discussed the outline of the City's presentation to the Boundary Commission. 6; ECONWIC:DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING REQUEST a. Councilor• Johnson advised Council that the Economic= Development Committee has requested to have a workshop with the City Council on, 8/20/86 from 6:00 to 9:00 PM. Consensus of Council was to see if a quorum would be able to attend that meeting.; 7. ADJOURNMENT: 7:03 PM 60puty City Recorder — City of Tigard FITTEST or — City .of Tigard LW/397.6A' Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 16, 1986 Al CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF P051I1dtl In the Matter of the Proposed STATE OF OREGON ) County ,of Washington) ss City "of Tigard ) P � Soh being first duly sworn, on oath depose and ,say. That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of ubli :Notice of Special "Meeting for he Counciltingidated acopy said being hereto attached and �90s Icy reference made a part hereof, on the �7day of w d SILK /,lc�l1trd,. Subscribed and sworn to before me th y of 1°$ Notary public for,Oregon My Commission Expires: --<sQ-' s ' A� `. 1 OREGON 25 Yeats Of S9MCe NOTICE OF SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING 9969-9988 Notice is hereby given that a special Council meeting, called by the Mayor �ti th the common consent of the Council will be held on .duly ls�, 1986, at 6:00 win the Tigard Civic Center Torn Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of reviewing the Metzger-Washington Square Annexation issues. mar John E. Coo? 13125,SOY Hail Blvd.,P.O.Box 23347,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 f Resolution No. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ANNEXKrION OF THE METZGER NEIGHBORHOOD WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY OF TIGARD AND REQUESTIONG MODIFICATION OF BOUNDARIES WHEREAS, the City of Beaverton, hereafter Beaverton, believes that cities' are the appropriate long term provider of urban services and Beaverton generally supports the annexation of urbanized lands within the Urban Growth Boundary, and MHEREAS, Beaverton supports the efforts of the citizens of Metzger to obtain an appropriate level of urban services by annexation to the City of Tigard; and WHEREAS, Beaverton and Tigard have formally agreed to an Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA), see attachment "Au (Resolution 2685) and the APAA establishes a mutally agreed upon annexation boundary for the cities of Beaverton and Tigard; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation of the Metzger Neighborhood Boundary Commission ,#2260, to the City of Tigard cross over the mutually agreed upon APAA line; and HHEREAS, Beaverton wishes to support the annexation of the Metzger Neighborhood south of the APAA line to Tigard. mom, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAVERTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, that: Section 1. The City of Beaverton supports the annexation of all of the Metzger Neighborhood (Boundary Commission #2260) south of the Annexation Manning Area Agreement Line (Beaverton Resolution #2685 and Tigard Resolution #86-25) to the City of.Tigard. .i e s Section 2. The City hereby requests that 'Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission (Boundary C(xnmission) modify the North Boundary line of proposal #2660 to coincide with the line established in the Annexation Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and Beaverton as previously cited. Section 3. The City of Beaverton hereby requests that the City of Tigard support the modification of the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commissionproposal #2660 to coincide with the lines established by the Annexation Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and Beaverton as previously cited. The City of Beaverton further requests that the City of Tigard send notice of its support to the Boundary Cmimission prior to the July 24, 1986 meeting. Section 4. The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of this Resolution and its attachment with the Portland Metropolitan'Area Government Boundary Commission and the City of Tigard at once. Adopted this day of ,l 1 , 1986. Attest: Approved: , r y Ann Johnson, City Recorder Larry Cole,Tayor LC:ca Res-Annex:6 t � C1,,ACKANIAS 9=cECF IVES y GTON JUL ® 1986 ()CD i S Pic-r D.OREGON 97204 Fill 229-SW7 S.W.sraFx STREET(sulTE ) Y AGE PrOPOSAL NOTIFICATION OF BOUNI�R a Attn: ----- proposal (No. . �(1 1 to: , °rhe Boundary Comission has xecei}ved a pr oP anrsex certain. territory to (b) thdraw certain terri.tcrY from The area involved is shown one attached map. Basic information on � this Proposal is as follows: Area: ��rQ (acres) Multi-family units �0`3; k Bxisting Land Use: Single family dwellings1 0 Cos�ners--ial structures Industrial structures other d le se escri . t Curren.- Assessed Vale-le: $ 3 Current Zoning:-2 0 Total Estimated Population: � $,t-• ter..,n �n rQi1�4�- D. Reason dor: Annexation, ®r (b) withdrawal is Proposed leve CIPMent: lease present a if you wish to make written cotrthan or 'recommendations oodraattend the Public Hearing 1eCter to this office no later than �-`. at 7:00 'P.m. to be held on urs y, ve, , ortl�snnd;, Oregon• on the above matter, Courthouse, 102 in Ptoom 602, Multnomah County Cenneth S. Martin E)ecutive ®££icer XCsw 71 Eac, I COh.1MISSlONEP.S: JOHN GRAGG a STAFF ROBERT L.WEIL.Chairman GEORGE HONNELL tCENNE7H.S:MARTIN.Executive Officer KATHY SCOTT,Yce•Chairman SUSAN OUIGK DENtECE WON:Executive Assistant WAYNE ATTEBERRY PAMELA RAGSDALE € DENIEC WON. Executive Asssstant RAYMOND BARTEL BOB WIGGIN MARCIALANA RUUEN,Acmmistratrve As3is13n7 HERBERTSEALS ; GREGORY FRANK ..' fI d No. 2260 MEN:: �t ,,_.i ���� .x•11 � i i� iI p��� may! �;Ir'ia � L�J�II zi CD ���1� �1'_�� `�C�EIL.I I II__=` � 1I\ Jan,. �•' L�J � ,� `� �? j�I- - \ � �� �,�apf.�f w �• BE4VERT01� �;,: ��y) �. �1 1 TAYLORS 13 1 RQ6,D _ op'v�� . -- a / / •J J �.a. v � •) �/�/� 1�.. JJ�'r JC 1,1 J �J v�� �~ jll TO r }� PORII.AI`ID,�_a ANNEXED �J { 4':4 - ��` _I �`�'�•' '�;� h. ; :::s�J �-, r� a` _ _ ��1� ,� ,S` t i PFAFFLESOUT 99 Ji a S AL PAAX ritl ABOVE ! j✓✓c— Oft t� _�^ � •� f' 111 i PROPOSAL NO. 2260 CITY OF TIGARD i iiti wR y FIGURE 1 a f Resolution Noo f CITY OF BEAVERTON, AREGON E A JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN TiiE CITY OF SEAVERTON AND THE CITY OF 1 TIGARD REGARDING URBAN SERVICES, OECLARISdO AND SUPPORTING PiUTLPL ANNEx TYON ;PLANNING AREAS OF AGREEMENT (APAA). E WHEREAS, the cities of Beaverton and Tigard have previously adopted joint APAA Resolutions (Beaverton Resolution No. 2647), but left the Washington Square Study Area for future review I and I WHEREAS, both cities {lave completed their analysis of the Washington Square Study Area and 'both City Councils have deteimi ned logical future annexation € and urban service boundaries for each city in the area; and WHrRa�A;g .the cities of Beaverton and Tigard find that municipal urban services 1 can be provided most efficiently and equitably by cities; and WHEREAS, conflicting land use plans and overlapping ares of planning interest x ' tend to .delay the ultimate annexation to cities and tend toward illogical and � inefficient service boundaries- and WH- EAS, both cities respect the rights and preferences of property owners and i residents to decide when to annex to a city according to State Laws; and WHEREAS, both cities see competition and conflict between cities over individual annexation proposals as contrary to their mutual long-range o _avoid such conflicts whenever possible by community interests and wish t mutually adopting a_ clear statement of areas of annexation interest. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Beaverton City Council that: Section Z: The prior Annexation Planning Area Agreement (-PAA) and Resolution No. 2647 is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety by, this complete nes agreement upon mutual adoption by the City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard. �e/- Page 1 of 3 c Resolution No. 1(C -5 t i rSect ion 2: A joint Annexation Planning 9'annin Area Agreement (APAA) as to urban i,..,.. services and future annexations hereby exists between the two cities. r Section 3: A South Beaverton - North ,Tigard boundary on future annexation areas of interest as shown on the map (attachments "A" and "B'°) shall : begin on the east at the Multnomah-WashingtonCounty line; then westerly following the south side of Taylors Ferry Road straight past the tax lots fronting SW 88th/Bomar Court; then ,south; to a point aligned with the rear of the tax lots just west of the tax lots facing 91st facing Cedarcrest; west to a point Avenue; south to Hall Boulevard; along the north side of Hall Boulevard, westerly to the intersection of Hall and Greenburg/Oleson Road; westerly along the: south side of Hall , to the west of the Washington Square access road; south behind the tax lots fronting Hail and to the west; to -the west side of the next Washington Square access road; north to a point on the south side of the Golden Key Apartments;. westerly between the south' side of the `Apartments and the north side of 'the commercial properties fronting into the Square; to the north side of the western Washington Square access road, westerly to Scholls Ferry Road; from there southwest along Scholls Ferry Road ,to the Old Scholls Ferry-New Scholls Ferry Read; intersection and,' then southwest along New Scholls Ferry Road to the Urban Growth Boundary. Section 4; The cities declare and support Beaverton's annexation interests north and west ,of this APAA Boundary and Tigard`s annexation interests south and east of the APAA Boundary; Section 5: The cities mutually agree that upon request from the other, that they will support annexation proposals to the other consistent with the APAA Boundary. The cities mutually agree that they will not approve annexations to their city contrary to the APAA without a resolution from the other city supporting such an annexation and specifically modifying any departure from the APAA'Boundary. Section 6: The cities further resolve to generally support annexations by the other even away from the APAA Boundary areas and to further develop a joint annexation policy statement in this regard. Page 2 of 3 (Resolution No. ,� k: pp� t Section a: The cities further agree to adopt the findings and consensus . agreement from the staff review and Council meetings on the Murray Road connection through the Old-New Scholls Ferry Road area from ' Beaverton , southeast into Tigard at 135th/Walnut. Section 8: The cities agree to revise, amend, and support other planning agreements consistent with this APAA resolution, and to an annual review to this agreement as the Councils deem necessary'.' PASSER: This-51L—day of Y1�1 ' kf 1985. ATTEST: AFFIRMED: �l Ci y Recor r Mayor - City o Beaverton LC:ca Res-Tigard:54 Res©lotion �o, lL' Page of 3 E i ����j'- •� ALLEN ,� �T �...1 I I i� `�• `�` day: as �J :yrs a Imo ✓ \�• i �.� rR2 � I�� ����" �i._ �•., �ZA~-'.�---! 'I Imo." ,� I { J JI / �� �'~�� I I i, •-� _ - , ate/ PEI 1 I i j' I - I I I � I , oc'.� u '• G t ; ,' _ ' ATTACHMENT A r 5 5r y cco�' ILA 11 ° { it pp g C1 EfF` A {.NEN Fi� .cs:l APA BOUN �� a amu- - '.. `� ,- ,,,•r "ffi'.. rrs �. .vawr..rlr. ,Q aw Q I nyL ° � � E t!/w'7/•^7-tea`!` L !r� y'�_•�l�h'T �'- :..cwao .�/ . a ^ '`• -lL�� 6."1 y� ,�� X T,� A `.'.a„`e y '" ij y E �t• 1�1 Stl T.. e !-_:. z,I^. - �_ i i {,I I I I 1 a f _ aw,.so "W+"°°�U.�wr--•,.-f { t 4 r y ITIPD� ;73 _ 7 �.'rrvISY7N ST t I '�• ;# JI' rt � = w <--r,n s n ay"O � 1Qcl•P 'r.` - s a0. i .. rL� �'� �!r�', "� �j •` � '• ,�J y S e a�'_^"�g`-'x j a F a n•IsH Ics. •'Bal BLVD._\.i3 a �"•� .1k44.."°r.°'°�R� `�^`6�di1_r (i �•�, _ ��� " Il�w1Y�1 1 £+ ..- -n+F�rtV�• 1 : '�UrQ?1 a � I • �' �'%�.� I $�4."-yam -�,- ty�+l 9a/E� i1-0. E '3`,�. ; p�l '�.y,Y � Y` ".,s. •°.H a u 4yY �- € - y,� ' l r ,�`;,m.nce...� f 1 e...���"' at-�I\.y,1��_ 4 -,eI d r--!'I':"'-- -� I t r"a&�• fnJ-,R± •r C`� r ura} �ENN#-`� I^. "-.��THO r^••,�✓J' $ s $,ea,w �_ l'. EY— wnJ "W ,- F 'aij S- ++..n_. I 1 Ga= Y� � w .'a�-•�3�stA 5.i' r."*A,m '' _ °.Ku`�9e�'e`�$��� �7Ca / �Jf�{ I � cr.R¢�rt`�°'1�i a �• w � e 40 „ • 12 + y F 4 f �' �$ "w+F s ��.�. n a„'. w., yv? e�a 7*] ,.a'= 1 nag C>'.-N'i..cn Jw r '�`• 8 s L / .5 c�� I I F f MFR _RDor Mtn �. I.-idlS: •c{ ...11 ' _ n♦ ..y..It }mRr.. WC,P I R� '�"��!�° o-�:M�.r�`•�•c mr I I n �� �f� E¢ _ 00mm > t3 _ Tr�q, T 2.. ^ .y, \1 OdK Ji•�I:i anrt„� I'� •'•�'p .a'eT j 11 31 f ¢ 'k. • ¢ `. `�'.m.l wrt.uu. n 9 { s�wR>`�R m �� 0._ ny. :� - v' � 3 PFAIlFIE ST p .TK1. d: � � F ^� ie.st t�tti• - 72000 - �. 4z t OA.' I firNI t In Si� ® �r I +Tir4j I o `(. � �, gar v Bull Mtn 14000 �"� ar a e. I3• _ Hr. �• .LLe•R n C ww 14000 AAR �Sttr+�R A.1fOONALD ST,R U) N _ R Bb I MTN saa • 8(JN/7A Cc FID King y �._ a c t City w„ y,,."�• .- � lsooa � t l ( BEND -01 rn,.r•nla- r LUANAf,� s 4. ava.w 2 a RD Fisc NDurha an I TffALL 9 I'' .� 1� t �^' •rr ��' i ( roe .I r v. July 14, 1986 Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 OREGON � Portland, OR 97204 25 Yec=of SeMce SUBJECT,. Metzger Annexation to Tigard 1469-9984 ! g x _ Honorable Persons: The City of 'Tigard is pleased to support the community initiated annexation proposal: formally joining the Pletzger community with the City of Tigard. Tigard and Metzger have a long common history and share many of the 'same interests in € schools, transportation, sewers, storm drainage, public safety, business and community liveability. The City of Tigard is pledged to work with the community in F obtaining a vote on this annexation. Tigard at 22,000 population and $1 billion valuation no longer that "small town on the xray to the coast"' -- is Oregon's 12th largest and 'fastest growing city in . Oregon's fastest growing County. Over the years we have developed the capacity to manage growth, annexation and expand' neighborhood support. , Abasic, high quality, low cost, services philosophy has served our changing community well. With the newly-completed $2.5 million Tigard Civic Center and our recent 59% voter approval E of a 5-year max.Base plan, the City of Tigard has the organizational and financial capacity to serve the needs of the Metzger -community. As the Municipal Services Study of the Metzger area shows, this annexation of the f area to Tigard is a 'jig-WI11 scenario. Tigard residents are even better and more economically served through the economies of scale affecting existing programs and t in spreading the costs of city-wide bonded debt over'a broader base. The Metzger areas capture abandoned revenue- entitlements and capital improvement funds unavailable to unincorporated areas. By Council Resolution, The City has pledged to return all revenues from the area directly back into area services and projects for at least_five years. The Metzger community is mature and politically capable of determining its, own ; future. Tigard supports that determination. Tigard does not presume to tell 1 Metzger citizens whether they should now annex to Tigard or not. Our task is to t inform> theca of the services we offer, the capital improvements we can construct, (, and to welcome them in as full participating members of one of Oregon's finest cities. The City of Tigard supports the community's right to decide for itself and vote on their annexation proposal. Thank you for your consideration and assistance. To my neighbors and friends in s Metzger, Tigard welcomes you, Sincerely, John E. Cook Mayor'' JCC/dc 13125 SW Hatt Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 �«n A C O fl F t i b ip. L L s L L = Y L o ^ ~ o o T v d a M y V C g L O Ay�qq O ^ t b o J L pQ V Q V '.✓ m c o n ao m e :.'.' s K a a.'� �.A Y w 2 6 •o y m� 4 g` e^ci o ��O s... E p ` tl IF b' h w� 9 y l C'••b.. � C W w + �.b O r COY o.n 's T••L• can NLmc. a y'e.OLa w � u wa n �U L O Rs a9 LQ L.K. 3� °"..a 6 p m t•3] ,b TY.L .hn gb•my tpJp tJ ` .V� ..i 1 to '�w� UL ♦+j 6r Ob � C YC mCtC� � y'" p� � �9 l+(� b ,C X86. 4Y 44 yrCM ap LMY Km:�^' UY C O 3 W m V' ib W N 49 a m Q..J 4 V w ✓ V su �.. ow A u u a Neu wee >v+rc w»oa we ' gy a„oHu Fp N c o3 p. as M_ @..+ iep y..o a ".o a u o u o a a -.i.w m o.o w✓ u w..ai y wo..� _u ao a w +p � 'Nes �c.•' �. �� RO RO u.4 •V aF qF q.. O OYx� -} Av 'Ou Np utl A4fi YVOum N_M yt 5F uti 4aNm yy o K N C E6.9t a m G � t9� Y N w m V.O � A u C �mar E t Y S [1.�q a0}ee =•rt A o R _ a C. '•1 �' .n o �w np u+ o � oD d u n o �o v aha �w Y6 U® CoA 6ocv e°`+sm omw m-e• i N m 0 ^ R �•s a9� d� 7yC a �.0 H ao phi w y b y � a Y. - 5 nm ya.o x�.snit auk �mR^w r^•,a �'cu da C V 6 n M M.O .690.N F • e �7{ r ME7Z6ER A NCXAIJ.UN PkOPU3M :y SERVICES TRAN:i2TiON tjMEl•wrli -- 1907— M -�)W N c-i98u-> IUN JUL t1,1C •SF:Pr (%'r NOV ilFf JAN iEFt CZAR' APR MAY Y ( NOV DEC 3m, ITB MAR APR MAY POLICE ns' t I STREETS tax STRE£Z LIGHTS syr STORM DRAINAGE .,.' „mak. ., }.... • SANITARY SEWERS PARKS b RECREATIONS : �•,,,�• p r r�4�•e"<,P�"a�a`TT” ltr >`'"f+.,i��''-tt 1,r�.�,.s�y'�`'�•+i.4t, BVILOING & CODES ,°' PLANNING t ENGR LIBRARY r r , '` -lii C .h....• t rI'M 'xf FINANCE'& ADMIk. 4 r....�.+. f+a .� 4 r r� r �- ... •ten..-... SP£CIAL'CIP LIST COHPARATIVE MUNICIPAL SZRVICLS ANNUAL USER PEES $40;000 A.V. KOHL YYLH HLTLOLR TYCAAD. 9¢AVLRTON PORTLAND FY 196-66' UAT&%USER F'LZS° 4145.40 3146.40 $16$.00 $ 61.00 S2'd2a°Usti:;.. 124.00 129.00 129.00 76.20 STORM DRAVA" 9.00 TOTAL 4275.40 $284,40 $297.00 $157.20 HLT2CLR ,YYCAP.D LLAVLRTON PORTLANp PaOPLRTY TAX $1135.20' 31216.20 $1903.20 $1371.60 # ,.USER YZLS:: 275.40 25y,4'.4a IOTA 0610.60 $1$00.60 $1600.20 $1526.03 LISS METZ=TOTAL1i10-60 i41a.6d 1410.60 TOTALDI7PLYZNCL $ 90.00 : $ 399.60 S 316.20 ESTIMATED REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE PROSECTION FY FY FY FY FY 1990-91 1987-08 1980-09 . 1909-�90 1986-87 LOW - HIGH Lop.4 - HIGH LOW - HIGH LOW - HIGH IOL: HIGH n ' S A B` R 6 A E3 REVENUES Franchise Fees 102700 -107035 215670 - 226453 226453 - 237775 237777 - 249665 249665 - 262148 TOTAL 5 YEAR Fees 6 Charges 88816- 93256 186515 - 195040 195840 - 205632 205632 - 215913 215915 - 226710 State Shared Rev. 91340 95907 185000 - 194250 185000 - 203962 105000 - 214160 185000 - 224060 REVENUES/ County Gas Tax 17500 - 18375 35000 - 36750 35000 - 35567 35000 - 40516 35000 - 42541 SERVICES: Property Tax -O- - -1' 482840 - 5069_812 444957 - 467204 430394 - dS1913 41613E -_ 437047 $4688250(A) - 300356 '- 315373 1105025- 1160275 1087250 - 1153160 1093003 - 1172167 1101816 - 1193314 4994209 8 TOTAL 108_7250 EXPENDITURES HIGH - LOW HIGH- LOW HIGH - LOW HIGH - LOW HIGH - LOW EX Police Services 210000 —199500 396000 - 376200 435600 - 413620 479160 - 455202 527075 - 500722 79800 04000 - 79800 Streats 42000 - 39900 84000 79800 04000 - 79800 84000 - 5 YEAR Streetlighting 28000 - 26600 56000 53200 56040 - 53200 56000 - 53200 56000 - 53200 Storm Drainage 28080- 26676 58968 - 56019 61916 - 58820 65011 - 61760 66260 - 64047 SERVDIREICES: Sanitary Sauter 55959 53161 112853 - 107210 117516 - 111640 123391 - 1172221 1295 123082 1$3595071(A) - -0- -0- -0- -0- Parks CRec. .x415321 B Bldg 6 Codes 9525 - 9048 20001 - 19000 21001 - 19950 22051 20940 23153 21995' _..(-Z -D- -0- `n- -a- -0°- '°' Planning& Eng. ^0 '� N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/R N/A N/A Library N/A N/A -On -�0- -0- -Lti- Finance LAdmin. -0- S YEAR NET TOTAL 373564 - 3548_85 727022 - 691424 776033 - T372's0 .129613 - 700131 8®8049 - 843646' NET REVENUE 173208>- t39512> 377203 - 468846 311217 - 415930 264190 - `384036 213767 - 349668 REVENUE FOR SPECIAL CIP: $1093179(A) 1578068 B BHE5s62 ria t 4 :. MEMORANDUM CITY 'OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council July 16, 1986 FROM: Bob Jean, CityAdministrator@} SUBJECT: Metzger/Washington Square Topics I. PROPOSAL' PROCESS, Ak'D TIMING What's the PROPOSAL? At the COW4UNITY'S REQUEST CITY COUNCIL OFFER . Resolution 86-53 SUPPORT MetzgeriWashington Square Annexation . ELECTION, November, '1986 CPO/PLAN' RECOGNITION CITY SERVICES SPECIAL CIP REPRESENTATION! . What SERVICES? LL RESOLUTION 86-77 URBAN SERVICES Police Streets StreetlightinS Storm Drainage Sanitary Sewers Parks and 'Recreation (Metzger Park LID UNCHANGED!) Building and Codes Enforcement Planning and Engineering Library Finance and Administrative Services EXISTING FIRE AND WATER DISTRICTS "NET REVENUE" TOTAL; REVENUE from 'Metzger LESS DIRECT SERVICES to Metzger EQUALS NET REVENUE for SPECIAL EXTRA CIP PROJECTS . . . Pledged for at least 5 YEARS to target SPECIAL CIP PROJECT" NEEDS IDENTIFIED BY MERGER After at least the first five years, services and projects priorities just like any other• City neighborhood How FAST for.Services and Projects? As officially,On file wit"' the Boundary Commission in the City's staff report SERVICE NLT LIMITED OTHER Police & Court` duly 2, 1987 March 1987 Emergency Backup January '87 Streets Jan. 1, 1987 ssume` Existing & Start New Installation Street Lights July 1, 1987 A Storm Drainage July 1, 1987 ar sooner depending on USA Transition Sanitary Sewers July 1,';1987 or sooner depending on USA TR Parks & 'Rec, Jan. 1, 1987 . NO CHANGE FOR METZGER PARKK LID Transition Building & Cedes April !', 1987'or sooner depending on;County . . . Planning ,& Eng. Jan. 1,' 1987 if County provides records . Library Upon annexation No WCCLS change Finance& Admin. Upon annexation . Capital Improve. July 1, 1987 with CIP Planning;upon annexation What Capital improvement Projects? Bikeways/Walkways Locust Street Hall Blvd. Streets Oak Street Improvement Greenburg Road Improvement 80th Avenue Improvement Storm Drainage Replacement of :culvert Taylors Ferry Road Replacement of culvert 80th Avenue Parks (if desired by Community & Metzger Park LID) What are the City's Direct Services/CIP Casts? Manges shown on Handout . . Average: $ 800,000 Services/Year 400,000 SpecialCIP/Year $1,200,000 Total/Year What's the Individual's Cost? Shown on Handout, Fact Sheet, and 84ewsletters Bottomline . 6% or $90/year . about $7-8 more per month . . . ABANDONED REVENUES about $400,000/year! When? Last year CPO invited Portland, Beaverton, and Tigard . . . CPO requested more information. Tigard is Municipal Services Study of Metzger Area Community initiated Annexation Petition CPO reviewed proposals and study Boundary Commission Public Hearing, July 24, 1985 and decision expected August 21, 1986 Election? loo petitions to Boundary Commission November '86 Election Election results to Secretary of State Census count and notification December '86 Metzger in Tigard City Services Start—up upon annexation as per schedule filed with Boundary Commission - a II, ISSUES AND CONCERNS Police: Two cops in Metzger Park? What's problem? You tell us. Response appropriate to need and situation. Who do we call in emergency? Sage as now, 9-1-1 . . . we'll coordinate at Dispatch level Blue shirt instead of brown short . hopefully faster'.. Tigard Police Drug Unit? Home Occupations Permit? Drug manufacturing? � Response appropriate to need and situation. New Police Officer selection? Established procedure in .place need to utilizeas is if to get new officers on in timely fashion . . . , State Certificationprocess . Police just a threat? Cutbacks by County Sheriff are real! County 'doesn't have the money` to be both a 'County and a "city" Parks: s No change by annexation to Tigard in Metzger Park LID Fire: No change by annexation to Tigard in Fire Districts Wate r: No change by annexation to Tigard in Water Districts Schools: No change by annexation to Tigard in schools Why change? Why now? You decide. You came to Tigard for information. You were concerned about Police, Streets, etc. We're not suggesting what or when you should do TIGARD is the ONLY city pledged to work with the community for a VOTE Consider Special Districts impact? LAW ENFORCEMENT, adequate, continue, response times, traffic enforcement, pedestrian safety . Special District cost? °$2/1,000 or $120/year STREET MAINTENANCE, local streets, collectors, arterials and major' intersections, $10/month or $120/year. Special District cost? � BIKEWAYS/WALKWAYS? Metzger proposed LID for $1.40/I,000? $80•-$90/year? County cannot be both a County and a "city" Complete COMMUNITY ANNEXATION vs. PIECEMEAL? City's offer UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY You CHOOSE or you may.LOSE services and opportunity TIGARD': LEAST CHANGE r NEEDED SERVICES LOWEST COST What's in'it for Tigard? Mayor's letter to Boundary Commission Lowerunit operating costs and 'improved efficiencies through economic scale . Lowerdebt service costs by operating over larger base . . . ' Planned change and stable transition vs. crisis . Increased influence and political clout in region and State . Washington 'Square III. €eOLICIES Mayor's changing? Council change? Binding? City Council Resolutions . .unanimous WIN-WIN souvenir Metzger 6,000 (20%): Tigard 22,000 (SO%) significant influence and representation! What if ELECTION FAILS? PIECEMEAL ANNEXATIONS Carved up between PORTLA„ID, BEAVERTON, and TIGARD Loss of community' TIGARD STILL HiELG4IES METZGER, noir or later, just consider that NOW MAY BE BEST OFFER REID IFORD Reid represented 'HIMSELF and HIS VIEWS STILL-; HE ACTED IN COPNUNITY INTEREST, NOT HIS OWN . he could have 'just 'worked for a small TRIPLE MAJORITY and cut out ;community . ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS HAVE RIGHTS PROTECTED UNDER STATE LAW WASHINGTON SQUARE Just as convinced and committed as many of you, got informed and will EXERCISE TI4EIR RIGHTS and make a BUSINESS DECISION. sb69 ,T<