The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 06/23/1986 x . f TIGARD CITE' COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to, speak on an REGULAR MEETIMb AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA " sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, JUNE 23, 1986, 6:30 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. ' Visitor's agenda items are 13125 S HALL BLVD. asked to be 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 0 STUDY SESSION 1. REGULAR MEETING:' 1.1 Call To Order and toll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non—Agenda Items: !lotion to approve as amended. 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Prase) 3. PUBLIC HEARING - 1986-87 BUDGET, FEDERAL & STATE SHARED REVENUES 0 Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By City Administrator o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By City Administrator a Council Questions Or Comments 0 Public Hearing Closed; 0 Consideration By' Council o Resolution No. 86—'k� 1986--87 Budget Appropriations 0 Resolution No. 86-73- Services Provided For State;Shared Revenues o Ordinance No. 86— s' Receiving State Shared Revenues 4. PUBLIC HEARING - GONZAGA STREET VACATION 0 Public Hearing Opened 0 Declarations Or Challenges 0 Summation By City Engineer o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination 0 Recommendation By City Engineer 0 Council Questions Or Comments 0 Public Hearing, Closed o Consideration By Council - Ordinance No. 86- 5. PUBLIC HEARING STREET NAME CHANGE SW 113th to SW GALLO AVENUE — NPO #7 A request by five property owners on SW 113th Avenue to change the street name from Sial 113th AVenue to Ski Gallo Avenue. o Public Hearing Opened o DeclarationsOr Challenges 0` Summation By Community Development Director o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination 0 Recommendation By Community Development Director 0 Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed K 0 Consideration By Council — July 3, 1986. r COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 23, 1986 - PAGE 1 i 4 4 is I C 6. £OUNCILREUIEEnI PUBLIC HEARING - RACIFIC FRONTIER WOOD ,MARKETS/,ROBERT RANDALL -COMPANY - CU 1-56, SL 5-86, M 1--86 =:REPO #I, :. A request by MPO W1 for `City Council re,riew �of .a Hearings •Officer, approval :,with conditions of a request dor �a Conditional `Use and Sensitive 'Lands Permit to allow the expansion <of mini- arehouse ,that will be partially within the 100 year flood plain and to adjust .a 2,534 square foot parcel owned 'by the City' of Tigard :and a 5.'51 ' acre g�arcEl': owner] by the applicant Into two �aa:r^cels of 2,21.4 square forst and =5.61, -acres on property zoned ;CBD. The ;prope,rty, is located`-.at: 8850, ;;8860.,; 8170, 8890, 2300 and 8934 `.Sint ;Burnham (UJCTM' 2S1 2AD lots '2200:, 3gOCi.; 2S1: MB iot 2000).. This will` be an "argument-type'" 'hearing only. The CoLanc11 ,will consular' only the record before the Hearings Officer, uahzch is :on file at City; Hall- The Council shall not consider -any new testimony or evidence { a,thich is not in the trecord. 'Pub ic bearing ,pened o Declarations Or 'Cieallenges o Summation Sy Community Development Staff F o Public Testimony: Proponerits,, Opponents, Crass Examination o Recommendation By Cammunity Development Staff o Council Questions Cr Comments 0 Public Hearing Closed 'D ,Consideration Ry Council - iFinal Order ,Adoption 7%14%86 7,. APPL:kL --'DF DIRECTOR'S INTERPRETATIML-ALLOWABLE 1USES IN -CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONE - PRAZRT�: a'iARKET, 8. 231lTERGOUERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH WASHIMGTON COUNTY 9. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 and 7 OF CIVIL "INFRACTIONS ORDI�aIANCE _ NO.. g6-3 0 Community Development Director IO. CHERRY STREET SEWER 'LID :REPORT (Stage II) 0 Project .Engineer 11. CIP/LIQ? REPORT n City Engineer 12.. ELECTRICAL INSPECTION DISCtE�SION o Coy m.unity 13ev�1opment Director COUNCIL ACEROA JUME 23, 1986 - !P.AGE 2' z'! rec{ue st 13_ �Cor4gErdT :ACENDA. These rou iteral u�as� "arate tdiscus!W oto ne Anyone mtine ay r�say be =enacted ,in Rohe motion �i=tho P 1 that an 4-tem 'be removed aby motion .for <discussion and sePstrate action. t oti'on to: '1986 '�APArove Ccsunc:i,g aIindtes —rune 9:, 33.;2 F?ecLive and File. a, R ommunity ,teve'lopment'Land iUse�fDecis 86 i Qpaetmental t�tont4ly Reports day c.. TPI tU,Ddate ;Staff ;Rpp€�r't -%d�ar3i� carry tta =3 -Approve wDe&jarx:nr =t�e'lsnquerit:Banc�Qgo�u�aon�'�io.�86— �fte�. 'No. `86 w la., 4 ;Adopt Tiigard :E-ledtric F�indan g 8es�ylution o• `86 r_k_a # 13 . ;Ai�gPt ;Lc�3kreran 1,Cnur�c�r riniiinns "- w mire '` Ppeal �Decaslon € 'b M6ire ? C=ie► 1 'xfactions 't3fficer`APP �.Casphi�ance KRaroement _;Chelsea Mill raaning :Sup^roughs; 3.?A17'Tiedeman,- :Realignment,`t�greamerit Engineer ins ' lA, t�kS,r�—ACENLi�i TE'4!?S: Etrflm sCounci+l ;ono :Staff —'Cas^ryovers "from ��ne 'lis �Dw htGwn',Counci`1 TA.2 Gaal ,& iLiasir�n TVEUC �1 . a a �Ur4an .Set,v'iceb ;14_x6 :Counr ll `+'Meetings .Calendar Fr,e ' Tigard �Cii y ,Council �;,aill ,��o into ':E"�recuti4e lro;, ,E3tEGU ?UE `SESSION, h to .discuss 5 se-,i�n tunder '�3ee Provisions :of ORS .192.;660 � �) issues'. � i .. :ADJOURNMENT , CZEY t UCIL AGENDA. ZURE :23 2 p r: S f Y F. Y ggendas chars :distributed aolwlg "'With the, 4dlditi'Onal Attm ieti4d�r. ti I Me MINT S .a.J 23, .1" '1. ROLL.. .i;a Pr� �sta d �year ;Johet: # ezanciiorAlerie ,cst'rac , Ie�rry F_dw&rda fl;*ft,`At:�a S2rQ. .)� <T�m ri �ommuunit Duval ,le anv;.city inittrator3-.Bill Monman, add :k3 rd y Bowles, hire cte ri Tidy Rajaiz, L"al COunsO -Ab snts � nciYr=. raly�ra. �de. W"AGMDA ITEMS �. i.tyAdministrator a�evie we the uOd atead agenda and .�ddi�ianr�l consent. *6da -tem-3. b. dtl "by ,-Councilor Edwards, sescaoded9 by Zounci.lor :Johnson to �ftti "i -approved by unani'maus'NOtO 'Of:CO rdcil "pr*sen$. I1iY S;ASENUA : . ,F t . m�'u�'y, .i <Kain, ..indiicat� tai$ .Mr. �n will "b� pres ting-Aba;I�.ntd a; Cmgcil"proje3rt_ deer �anwAqends-items. ENM ISea—�' . �T,=F 1. $s £�T�,Ti::�4r` Ii;��' public:hearing ,apenod Ao .. 4bstribut4d :an . :Cityd ieat. t. A,revizrdresclUtton,approving the bdi0t•:Of overall ,� With the _$11p $ La;`a dittr.ibuted. A "ae reeeult..d4 dizcu%�ieansa d f:� °+ �dbr vy' r rid, it X81 _T*C aid 't�tst t�eee .Library r it d er w"'da p�wt t .distil ."further discs�s�iraaas can -t�bd� ,place between t sq -st&lf,;;udci%, Board. C 'Public`T�ffi i ,ya m *. i1.Ieer, :10920:8W Highland rteDr. and member O4 .Library ,of:_& rfi-01d"Tiaard 3Liai USion, y An mrd, .'Oup orteei Ael&ldi"g :the ,iracla��i2sn :;�� Aho L.ibrar �Ccwwnity ':Oopamrtt to gall "tip far .further stdis9y. a 10 ,Library 1t,�&j11, 1 ld,4-Library' iServe;e :. grt� uifb , erd, '1re " err t, rrt%,vatie' 'Library_c b ; 416t4d-for in'rde�th''Zteady. P6,00.•1 a d I HB T ., une , ;lea A: U.. d. City Administrator reco ,anded appy vsal of the budget rasolutionu an revisod. e. Public„ hearing closed. f. 'RESOLUTION PSC. 86-65 A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF T18RD t PROVIDES.SERVICES,12UALIFYI FOR STATE.,SHARED'REVEES g. fttion by Councilor Sridn, socondedby,'Councilor Johnizcn to approve. t` Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council preZent. �qq� @�1 ��qg�_ CITY'S ELECTION TO h4 �d7&DdtYA�dii6 311. ��^.��G �y� CS�3l'DYC�."4�E I� A�I�� T� RECEIVE STATE-REVENIIES i. 'Motioniby,Councilor Brian, zaconded by Councilor Edwards to approve. � Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. j. LUTICSN' . -S6 A -RESOLUTION AMMVING TFM BUDSET, MAKING ,,,APPfMPRIATIMM ,AND DECLARIM THE A9 VALGREMTAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR k. Ration y b Councilor..Brian, seconded by'Councilor Johnson t® appgove. ^; 1. '.The Council tagreed,that the Library should be deleted from the Coa=nity""Services Department at this time and that Butter ntudy be ., :conducted. o. Motion approved by unanimous vote of-Council present. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - :(MNZASA,STREET VACATION A. Public hearing opened. ;b. City'Engineer �nopnized report, indicating the last s fence on Exhlbit A - legal `d criptionp, reading'"Save and except an ea Ment for.-utility purposes over the entire parcel to be vacated" should be .dal etad. c. Therewas no public testimony. d. Public, hearing-closed. � e. ORDI " E 86-33 WORDIPd CE;'AIACAT°ING .A PORTION OF SW GDNZAeA STREET 3 —w Tib AND 69TH AVENUES AND DECLARINGL4tM EFFECTIVE'DAT'E 4. :Mati ;by-Councilor Jofmsonr seconded by 'Councilor Edwards, to approve as amended witWth- el,delation of the indicated sentence. K: PI€�tion approved',by aniMQuZ veata of;Coaancil pre�snt. ' app y u COMCIL'MIMJ EB . .dune 23, 19M Y s �. €U ID I STRMT f 1p. -'D . Rid 113TH ,TO D AVENUEN ? a. pubijc hear inn opened. t4stimanys Jiro=Hopkins, 11720 SW 113th AvQ., distributed a letter and revi'owod the reasons -far the req�se t with regard to the confusion of the cstraet nwms in thO immediate area. jameq Gallo, 11200 2VJ Tigard St., expressed Wpport for the r oquest. Z. public hearing closed. d, �Di '-FdD. °� DDI a ° �4 A .CERTAIN ROAWWAV,,HEREIN.SPECIFIED, IN THE CI-T 'W TIGMD, AND DELL: IN:3 "4 �. 8�,tstiQrs : byEdwards, seconded by Councilor urian, t pr ovo. fttion approved ni s by Una -3vmt'e Of Council present. 7. A PUBLI {BARD _ PACIFIC FRONTIER MOD' MpgMT3/R0DERT RP.NDA L VI: � Y - ��3 2-y , ' L. -� $, �1� � w tl1 approval r p t. by 1 ®r City Cowcil review of a Hearias ra officer �p6s with ce�oditions of a request far a C ditional Use and Sensitive i.arazia Permit t� ` it the panat of mini arehoaga that will be partially within the 100-�year fly plain and to adjust a 6I owned by�,cbs� fact parcel ed by-the .�'aty of,T Bard and a 5.51 acre parce:ownl ned by the applicant into two,parcels of 2,214square loot and 5.61 acres en property zoned CBD. The property is bated ata 865o, X3 0, 8870, Sago, 0, and 8930 >Burnham, ( TM 2SI 2AD Let% 220OF 3000;.;291 2DD L.ot 2000). a. Public hearing opened. b. Senior planner Ksith Liden reviewed the Eearings Officar's decision on and the-WO?e,aPP04 . CCity t orney .explained ',the l-lid transfer. d. public Tia ti yi c, riiyra' Di �! , p&cific Frontier Wed Harketa, . 090ain tha piarp�aa�; f the e t to *Xpfin the lata isse s t - provide irsi��ear^ h ear; tar ge. The oxt ssri0re will bz Jimitod o -C*�ats�al DistOct uses,and more particularly tG 'uini-warah se .apses. Asa distri Leel a'cry 01 a p t3in3rs the arca f th& prOp02 1`dt line adju t nt. p 3 IL:HI ., Jac " , -1 i opponents: o ftry.Gtt® Chairman, 'WD 01q described ;the 8+, Pis concerns as contained In their letter dated spy 28. Tho major- It*ass of cvncorn were discussed with regard to clarification of the extension ag. :to whom the non-conforming use ends and the >mini-warehouse beginsg confirmation in writing that the owner will not eutend the non-conforming 3.tseel and the possibility that the City obtain the land for the park separate from-,than lot lime adjustment. He felt, the=lot lutea ad ustimont should bo hoard on Its own merit. There dares not appear to be`any justification for trading the property. e. Commnity Development'Director indicated that there is a special provision,in the non-conforming use section of theme Code written for their purpose which givea then a,maximuw. allowable square footage to be used for industrial uses. in this type facility. The 'allowed amount can be moved around in the existing facility but theme uses c sprat gaa into the now buildings. f. Councilor Brian reviewed the background for allowing non-conforming as in mint-storage areas duo to tho high vacancy rates and the economic vi uatioa. ftweverg thiia may be an appropriate time to review the past procedure since the situation no longer *xists. -... g. �"itl! d iFe$ treatar felt the fifty mhae31s3 anrour g the se-Wer connection if the intantiog is to work gradu&lly out of the light Industrial sto*eage type uses and wort mato the CBD zoning. The now buildings are conforming in the COD. h. Diucussion knsuod on tae background of the conditional ease approval ,for this type«of"facility. 1. Gloria Johnson,' waas.cancern*d that Conditicm 17 regarding parking be kept in tact. , . Community _Devalopmart Director recommended that the Hamrings OfficWs decision be upheld with the change from the reference ;to Comordial ;Industrial .zming to Central Business_District zoning and clarify that the sections sof the Code that relate to this are the Central Bginoss:District 'sections of the Cowunity Development Code. The lot line adjustment should be conditioned ;upon 'approval by'the City of the land swap. k. Public .hearing cl000d. 1. Notion by Councilor .Yohnwo ap seconded by; Caunci2or Edwards <to approve.' Page 4 - CEU4CIL MIMTES - June 230 1986 �F Glx Councilor Brines questioned whether the Council should take action regarding the non-conforming asses. 1He summarized other rece-smondationsi no sanitary sewer and water connections should be R oxtended to the now buildings; clarification of mini-warohouue storagegdeletion of the lot linea adjusstmont; and further study the cessation of the coon bitr nasl uses that are 'Pon-conforming in the CO. n. City Attorney said the issue of the non-conforming uzess must be herd under separate consideration of the Code. o.` Mayor Cook ,said the Planning Comission whould review :that portion of the Godes. p• Motion by Councilor Brian to amend the m ation to delete the Hearings Officer®s Condition No. 13 and add a condition' that no sanitary sewer and wast4r saga^vice be provided to the oxtonsions Modify the language to includo, the ch.angas as discussed by the Community Development Dir too with reforonce to the CMD; and add that the uzes3, per the Nvaringas Officer'% findings, be restricted to moot storage uses allowed in the Central Business District. The motion was meconded ,by P.ounc i i car Johnson. iendmont approvod by unanimous vote of Council preaseant. Motion as amended approved by unanimous roto of Council presont. Ty g.; f CYCLIC ON Senior Planner Keith Liden reviewed the draft report. He felt it would be beneficial to review the report with the haulers at the time of the franchises agreemonts in the fall. b. Councilor John%tea rec mended obtaining input from the Utility and Franchise Committoo and stating in the report that the Committee has' revieawod thy+ reports CO. Senior Plaanner. l.iden said.he will talk. to they Conmittere aboutadding an amendment to include that the City is reviewing the issue of recycling vegetative material. de City Administrator felt the report should include a submittal letter signed by the Mayor to include the Council's concerns regarding the Issue of recycling backyard debris. 9. INTE M*IENTRL AOREEM4T WITH WASHIaNTON CCRNITY 4. Community Develop nt Director synopsized report b. City Administrator indicated that the Council racy want to ,add conditions pricer to submitting to the County. The romd In in bard heed of ropair; however, the Council has indicated they want to take aver juri diction of the road in this area. He further rocomended Dego 5 CMWIL HINJTESa Juno 23, ';i i I i changeg to gection 2A of the Agre* nt. C. Cr, :nrilor Johnson 4s39°7 a�� concerned about €� 3. 5 li tb inprovemants n*Wed and the funding for those projects. -lie had hoped that the County would complete %we improvezents before transferring Jurisdiction. I d. Dave Atkin%on, 10460 Century Oak Drive, liaison for Suerfield-Tigard, wanted to be aware of any revisions they Council is going to makes either, now or daring the presentation to thea County an July f so he can prepare hiz pro sontation accordingly. e Councilor Edwards wag concerned about losing the opportunity to gain Jurisdiction if the City places too many c dition%. He ;auggostead accoptirg the,agreement, to go forward with obtaining JuriMictions and proceed from thore. f. It was decided that the City Attorney and Community DevelWmant Director s3ho ld works together to arrive at appropriate language for revisions to Section : and return later in the meeting. bCM IM' INS CWgPTER 5 AND CHAPTER 7 OF CIVIL 11WRACTYC S CRDIPA E 4MCommunity Dsval mont Director synopsized proposal. : b ORDINANCE N3. 86p35 AN ORDIMMEDZNS CWPTER S MD C4 TER 7, OF `tKIE CIVIL I RACTIMM ORDINANCE C. Kotion by Councilor Brigs, seconded by Qmncilor John%on to approve. Reties approved by a rani us votes of Council present. '. it. y STREET R LID T (Stage 11) a. City Engineer synopsized report. He had sent letters to six property awn*rs. Tho lettere were sent out late dues to failure of mord,procesning aquipmmt, and he Maass received anly two responses one oppost-d and one in favor. He also received as tolephonez call in favor. Hee suggested the issue be tabled until the next mooting to allow tip to abet with;the property owners. b. Tony Makaymp spoke In opposition to they formation of ,the"LTD. C. The issue will be heard,at the .Feely14 meeting. ` 12. CIPdLID RMAT F2. City Engineer synopsized report highlighting major projects. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve. Notion approved by unanitwus vote of Council present. Peg* C ECIL MIMTES June 23, 1986 t 1 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION DIeCUS510M �a City Administrator %ynopsized report. b. No action necessary by Council. 14. a ��1a Tia��c� its s raa considered to be routine and may be � enacted in one motion without soparate discussion- Anyone MY requestthat an its be romoved by station for discussion and separate action- � G Motion tog 14.1 approve Council Mina�atoa m Dara �� 1�C it 14.2 Receive and Fillba a. pity nevelop arat Land Use D�cisiWS1 b. Departm"tat Mthly R ports - tray.. 6 c. PI Update Staff Report -- Hand Carry 14.3 'Approver Declaring Delinquent Danacroft Installments « Resolution �4a. �. -67 14.4 Adopt Tigard Eloctric Findings -- ftsolutiOn Nom 8"43 311 3 k4.5 Adopt Luther Church Findings - Resolution floe -69 �. 14.6 WaYMITO APPOSI Dvcisioa .. 14.7 civil Infr ti az Hearing% officer �pc+ir;t nt 14.8compliance ,Agree nt - 'Chelsea Hill 13.9 training b Burroughs . g'r� at Engineering Realignment � t14,k Ti,;h tratr indicttd that14.6 has been deleted City ini i. 1 ti sig. iter 14.7 is the appoia�t��n� aa€ Mary ��». Goatngilor Brian indicated that he and Mary Bowen have a business relationship ;: but this has no bearing on the apprwval. Ra. Councilor johnson sug4ested 14.9 be tabled or pulled for further r di scussi assn a �. C. BRotian by C®uncilrr• Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to adopt Consent 'Agenda with the deletion of 14.2x; and 14.6 and adding Mary -, Bowen's name to 14.7. Ration to amend by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to delete 14.9 for discussion. .. Amendment approved by unanimous vote of Council present. �s Motion as amended &&proved by unas�i�,ou� vote of Council present. d. councilor Johnzan questioned whether it Was necessary that the rine top mnagers all attend the SurrOughs training because of cost factors as well an time assay from the ,fob. City Administrator strezz*d the iMPGTtfi0c* of th* *MPI oy*ez to rarceive the training first hand. The training will not be conducted in the Portland area for : nether year, page 7 COMIL MINUTES June 23, 3 > 1 i i c. , . It was decided that Joy Martin would tel*phano the Council members .. by the end of the and of the week to explain why the training is onsential to tho oporati n wad obtain: a talephane vote. � F 0. Motive by Councilor Briant atcotded by Councilor Johnson to table t . ub ect' to tolepilon pall �o later than Fri of �C�aiu ��s�. tiaraapproved by unanimous vote of Council prOsOnts The Council roturnod to Itm g. IT WITF a. 'rho city Attorney and Comunity Devolopmont director recommended the following char to Section 2s Add the fallowing to , A "d1.e. section depth and paving thicPn ss ,but not access or other County aa€ie r, air a t !"� d bat* Mire Section 22B, ronumbering action to 29. u. b. €ation by Councilor Johnson, seconded by ;Councilor Brien to authorize the ?A 1ayor to sign the agreement. H--tion prov*d by unanimous vote of council present. 3� � Dia ITEIN From acil and Staff - Carryover from June 86 ' 15.1 Downtown Council ' A. Community Development Director sue rued the programa. Councilor 'Brian felt printed materials would be tasior to distribute and tho exi ting slide program could be utilized I it IRST updated. r: b. eacilear Johnson �szggos�ted -allmating a certain amount of funding to updmto the slid* program until adequate Justification for a video is proven. �. c. ! uncllor Brian said hey will sant support the propo5aal as -writt n �. . _.—..-- "----..._a.�__._..tie t......a.a_,„_.._e Eiut bhp -support Le➢@ (a4�s€sd I ca"8aaf .ov gn F.rF9aasaa .�ev�l m.sww• :, A. As Dowintmn Liaism-, Councilor Johnson will. contact John Savory to discuas than matter. The issue wag -tabled with no action. 15.2 Cila and Liaison a.. City Administrator distributed copios and revi*wed tht CounciI 1 Asstgnmontu. 13.3 ; City Administrator discuss" tho issue and asked for the Councils initial r&actiaA. b. COsaraC11o^ Briars requested ti€atod cast; figures when th* inmue x i I comom back for further review. 15.4 Urban services - CQjtjnued to July 34 13.6 COUncil 'Mootin gs Calondar 90 .duly 19 Was now for a COuracil WOrkshop for a quarterly review of goals. b. A maoting will bo zch*duled in August for an exective session for the Cit° Administrator's seal- -rjual perform&nco roview. c C001cilor Johnsion r0quested a work BOOSIOn with Council and the Downtaim Council Is. TPI Update Dopartm&nt indicated they hav* been in Contact with the TPI Staff. orfat 4PP'Lcaticns will beaturnod In this woos. All merchants affected b the cured& and street -closure have boon REMS MDS 10s40 17. EXECUTIVE SESSIGHt The Tigard City council went into Executiv# 'Be ion �:nder the provisions of CRC 192.664 (3), (d), and (h) to discuss d anding _ litigation. IS-° MURMIE Ta INSO Tama. A`- City of 'Tigard 'PagO 9 MIL 4, 10=3 June 23, 1 xk i•, 4. 77 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY ILggrf 7-6757 :. P,O.SOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising City of Tigard [� T'earsheet Notice P.O. Box 23397 e Tigard, OR, 97223 ED Duplicate Affidavit � AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. being first duty sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director,or his principal clerk, of theI ge r a TJ TAPS a newspaper of general circulation as defined in . Ge ORS 193010 %, pt and 193.020;published at TiF- ard in the aforesaid county and state;that the a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,has published in the K �a � : �' � � �M 1 astir®issue of said newspaper far— 1 successive and F" a a` t � # t consecutive in the following issues: Y� # r �S° E June 19 $6 i June 20, 1986before e this- _ri6edas2aS bscin lr c` of � = otary Public€or Oregon '2 A a fa sad t My Commission res: 9/20/88 17" a..x AFFIDAVIT 4 E S x d; L A 7 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal! 7-67,96 � t P.O.SOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 NoticeIt IBEAVERTON.OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising a ® Tearshest Notice *City of Tigard QP O. Box 23397 a 0 Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STtATE OF OREGON, )ss. COUNTY OF WASt#ENGTON, I Stephanie Neubauer being first duly sworn, depose and say thet I am the Advertising Director,or his principal clerk, of the Tigard a newspaper of general circulation as defined in OILS 193.09 �» and 193.929; published at' Tigard in the aforesaid county and state;that the Piib = a z)c flr1 ng Nnt i ra €a7` g7 Ba S� i. a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the ��w� y z 1 successive and z entire issue of said newspaper for 4, u i consecutive in the following issues: s� a64U4 June 19 , 1986 i ice.s'S KJ"� . Y E•. 3 % t�` v JZJg a $ dd �` gg 1 'e Z=. Subscritsad sivo before me this June 20� 1986 4bNotary Public for Oregona V Z" en S a,; rn�AyCanission Ex it-as9/20/88 AFFIDAVIT �,; 'i CITY OFTIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT ±?F POSTING In the tetter of the Proposed k STATE OF OREG PI ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard )t being first duly sworn, on oath depose and. say. That 3, Posted in the fcellowicig public and conspicuous places, a cosy of Ordinance Number(s) �. which were adapted at -the Council Meeting date ((v _ copy(s of said 'ordinance(s) beim hereto attached andbs reference made a j part hereof on the _.� day of�iril-F�J 1986. I. Tigard City Hall, �§fi-€�rPy��S--Yid i3� 2_S t7 f�a-L)— �tt� , 2. -i e� �2 ,F t3- Td -H v g Tigard, OR l.E�.�.�/:C.n.tF'..1 �..r�-L.o^'!.J_ i,�'r3�J r'�GLt�� xl,,•.�:{'�1�.�-°t--�-'' 3. Tigard, OR Subscribed and sworn to before sae this day of 6, If 'latary Public for Oregon' My Commission-.Expires. d/-® 99 CITY. OF TIED, OR N imcE No. 86 7 ORDINANCE DEI T� CITY°S ECTiC1N It) 2F.CEI`1E S ESri[T a. ZEE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLIMIS: SEC 1: Pursuant to O S 221.770, the city hereby elects to receive state revenues for fiscal year 1986g87 PASSED: �y e �t.�` ,�v�. ^� vote of all Council. members present afeer ung r yu 1ra&r and title Only, t��s � 5' of; , 1986. AP-MOVED This 3 r? day of _ a 1986. s oo c, t y()r i i ORDINANCE NO. 86— � FACE 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. s6-33 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTIONOF 'SW GON?AGA STREET BETWEEN 68TH AND 69TH AVENUES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the ;Tigard City. Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08`.030 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the, reason and purpose , for this vacation is to return the right--of-way area to the adjacent property owners to facilitate development of the parcels; and WHEREAS,, the 'vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, in accordance with ORS 271.100, and TMC Section 15,08.110, the Council: fixed a time and place for the public hearing and the Recorder published notice anis posted notice in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, notice has been wailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area, has described in ORS 271.080; and WHEREAS, the Council, having held a hearing on June 23, 1986, finds the public interest will not be prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is ire the public interest to approve the request to vacate the right-of-way area because the public interest will not be prejudiced; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the following condition is necessary to vacate said land: The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of this .ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1:_ The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that portion of right-of--way area known as SW Gonzaga Street between 68th and 65th Avenues as described on` 9he attached Exhibit "A" and shown on the attached Exhibit "B", and by this reference made parts hereof. Section 2: The Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be subjec' to.,the following condition: ORDINANCE NO. 86--� Page F lw/3896A x' K01 ; 11"FIE11,11 1111 IT .a The vacation shall not be effective until the effective elate of this ordinance and shall Trot be until. a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor, erection _ In no situation shall this ordinance be effective c.ntil the 31st, •a Sec after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Councilmembers present after � - rsher and title only, this day being read by Ha of a� 1386. y, Recorder APPROVED: This day of 1986. �� i Mayor ,: i ORDINANCE NO. 4 Pa_e 2 �F, � i` lwf3€i96A F77 i,. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION �- FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF S.W. GONZAGA STREET CITY OF TTGARD A parcel ;of lasad 3n i he plat of WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, Washington County, Oregon; flee said parcel being all of S.W. Gonzaga Street (Seventh Street) between. S.N. 68th Avenue (Washington Street) and S.N. 69th Avenue (Grant Street),', in said plat described as follows: ' North 02° 33' 06" Beginning at the morthwes�tt'corner of Block 32; hence, Fast*, a distance of 60,00 feet, to the Southwest corner of Block 29; thence, B7a 28° 47" East, a distance of 199.97 feet to the Southeast Come, bi Block,2.9; thence,.South 02 33' 17" ;'.est, a distance of 50.00 feet, to 'thence, the Northeast corner of Block 32, Nor+ih B7 2$' 47" West, a distance of 199.97 feet to the point of beginning. The parcel of land to be vacated being approximately 0.275 acres, Save and except an easement for utility purposes over the entire parcel to be vacated, REGISTERED pROFFSSIONAL LAt-1. SSU V -Y R OREGON Sit-T!E!!e:£A:3.1977 KEITH Ce.THOMPSON '135G ; a Y Beams are rased on County Survey No, 20974. mac' �Jl wr° � x g zf'A I ' 4 r r c � x ' +caw r �„ We i F a v 9' bb a i Y � FaA • _ �_ ;arc.,Ky= 'y t- ;.�aiv. lTy}. 3- x "�j'f ! afa'a'��`k�3�'�°' "�. �'"�°,s�+. i�"?§�'T:'�ir�'��.r' *"" 'T`" �� 3ia:,,. �' 'ice :3� .ga:._d-.,y..k'.;:.K..-a,"~- ,�A"i•.- u�"s ,>A�Gs��K-�'m �j, �5' �� '€w��",r�."�.z_"R'� `k°� `ti.c�iz• �� ` $'�'rs'^�� ''�r� _.�iCasy "' t�;��g,.-�'+ a'. � '�i � �yti�*ur q u ��.° �es�. �y',' -r��;,'�"' -:t;'`n F i .�_ :� x 'rte i �"`" r,•;� x� te � 4 i a ! CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON 31 ORDINANCE NO. E6- A CERTAIN ROADWAY, HEREIN SPECIFIED, IN THE AN i3RLlI�9�kP]CE CHA�lGIs'G THE NAME OF CITY OF TIGARD, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. 'Whereas Tigard City Council . finds that purwant to ORS 22?.,120. .the Cian tic Planning Cary+n.issiOn has'submitted �a recommendationT to suncil to spec ieii rename inethe existing dedicated: roadway, within the City attached Exhibit "A:, said roadway not being a county road or state &aighway, and, and City Council finds that changing the name of said roadway will bllereas, Tig alleviate existing conflicts with surrounding street names., and,: Whereas, Tigard Council further 'finds that a 6, athearing on said proposal to was :held .on June 23, 1986, at ?:GO i�.M., and that.. th� rename said public way publication in the Tigard Times, notice of said hearing was given by p newspaper of general 'circulation within the City of Tigard within file Viand prior to the week of said hearing, and that said hearing was duly regularly held by the Council at the time and place as publicized, whereas, ..� all persons Pa interested and the general public were afforded an ld the opportunity to be hea hep public e�intere t and nsaid the best nter sts�®f 1the�City finds that it is in thew o€ the limits of the City that the ..said. proposal be arid' the six mile .area adopted. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS ,AS FOLLOWS Section. That the dedicatdtheusa'me itherebysrenamed as speci€iedached Exhibit A�` be, and :forth Of Section 2: That the City Recorder shall Clerk file a certified c°pyand ;his' Ordinance with the County of Washington County, a like copy with each of the Department o€ Revenue and Taxation, and Department of Land Use and Transportation (county Surveyor) vote of all Council members present after PASSED: By this .7.3a"{ day being read by number and title only, of 1966. moi✓� � G� `e..`" 1 ' Recorder of 1.986. APPROVED: This _�,3 t� eBay __ - --- �3ghn Cook, Mayor (2631P) ORDINANCE NO 86 Page 1 EXHIBIT "A" S. B. 113th Avenue (old name) — S.W. Gallo Avenue (neva name) — being that portion lying between the south right--of--way lane of S.W. Tigard Street (county road No. 916) ;and the south line of Lest 21 CHERRY, 14ILL ACRE TRACTS, a plat recorded its Book 4r page 17, Washington County Plat Records. (2fa31P) i ORDINANC5 NO. 86- Page 2 q _ Y Co. Ind. No. 916 sL:S 140. 13.0791 , rrJac�:�,/sr �.:: r.��z��•' �t:.�f.;:��:'i ✓�, .,. ..s� sr�.��r..��.�/r,: i,�,sr.J.,�rrJ;�;�r:.+rtrrisJ.rrrrJ. s;�rir./r �ir.�.sy�.�r {.� 5e , 72 a2 ....6@9 >° • T3.i1g699a 3 m 43 3J 4'x M 4 4 00 2700 R-220rw x'13`7. 2900 13�r 26008 00 = 29.4c. 3000a ate, i1 .OAC. 15 ,c 0, 16.5J.9t- d 365so P 1 26 1: em 91:13 re 8300 1-4s ad,32x-35"1: Illiii e 1 a 4301 -+ ® IsSA \" E1200 % SC.,j0o. O?STR/CT 0231 SCHf)OL DISTRICT i 742/771 744136 O 1 25 x,70 0 i tri Na n i0(3 L r , 9 1,2 I 1 136 �n 5100 --l" 7 t fl Q s 2 'A 2=1 �' 2 °� 46 O 30 �' S A a 2 X 120 - m ' -0 b 0 o o �, C%[�/� ® t7 O P m 2 W. � �� P. A P 520E P •"' P r 23 o tly� lt �' : 7900L 120 0 5300 � `g 7300 4--1 ..-1 � W 10 22 136- I �.. 1 ��.... .x,7400 o o78 0 sr 5400 Mme'e 5 O. T= .. © 2E 100_gi /i-� 770011e.as 1 120 z 5500 \�?500 �.3o ry`b Sx 3 2w 20 6 w y 7'6`00 INITIAL N 7 _ . 120 ° POINT. aON882904"W 333444111 O\ �— 72 ,_ 72 72 5600 �rrurrii��i s — \5f4ffrfh'Filda s 3.z 4 / 19 tl499 ICE 5700 m` R a ro: o i8 m 1T (i$TRrCT sF '3 rk 8942 0 22 7461667 0 5900 �. 1 r- Q► 6:40 16 �` a ( 2BO 10932 653.24 GowN C J/ C P 19.44 42 ° 15 100.95 t` _ 300 R. 6100 G P nSC1ai'01 LISTRlC7 m23.. x ' w 1.61 :: .¢ 21 737.63_' 970? 3700 6200 12 2 . TR C INITIAL PT 613?4 'BAST i I• J/i/J'.ri r /iii iin r�fiA•✓ .K..,,.. , / ° +, /IJJJ/////J/J fJJJJ/Fl/%JJ//J/•'J////.'%/J///////J'%////%l////////"/J/J/IJ J�;[J/JJJ/ JJ/ - ld.90°OO' w 256 1304.33 L tcu 9 .1a � A tt ��.�'T. - 6.A. W�CGONi RE � � • ... `. e SCALE I`° a o a i :l j� ' 1 i1 a �f 1 I Ll j"tj'I ,.. -z-j�,- 1 �� 1J� , `;' •,. ' .; •r r �� t �` -�,4� ,�� I t- � � ' r• \@sof• 5 C ��._ All.',l �°+... �Y r f _� 8 P� .4/-}`�v\.`.C�✓!' -1.. �R � \ \••es" �!!l. (--�- 7�r-,-i_5.•r.rn l fr.. 1"�-Tr� ��'ci'q�� r .)'�._i.: 34't35 m -T- 1 JUNIOR 21 �. L.F. a Ce � i #...L ! L, :_� - - w Z ( +i 1 /'` � ;•.• l( , r � / 1 `rte• 4"'� �`'''_ i .? �. � e t�'• � jru.ur Nt d � too, -7- p I 1 � pTV � 27 ��nri � 1M•A J .�-��::qjJJ( 1 ,, � � •� t j ' �I j _a. -'s.. :,o,e. 6�-_ - ,7 �• `�,,`� �,�.'�,a�`. '-•�, -•�•� i-.�-j— � -1 `SLI I f � , ..:� ! 1 � s.`�';_;\, ; J'�t•�.. , ,,l .La a 1` xr 1 '� ��' 1�. I�'.�� SS y f 5:5 � �ii ' i t 5 `\\�;• \ `h \ \ a. �i'.� f:! r:'i ; i tf7- �',/� y��i.- •ll ..0� �o\ �S i� !°l •a I is '°' t ..� 1 - ��\�.��, 167 i - • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE WO. 85-3 3 AN OROINAOCE VACATING A PORTION OF SW GONZAGA STREET BETWEEN 68TH AND 69TH AVENUES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE SLATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council initiated this vacation request pursuant to Section 15.08.040 of the Tigard Municipal Code; and t;MEREAS, the reason and purpose for this vacation is to return the right-of-way area to the adjacent' property owners to facilitate development of the ,parcels; and F }�E:EAS, the vacation is recommended by the Planning Commission and the Cit} Engineer; and WHEIREAS, in accordance with ORS 2.71.100, 1 and TMC Sections 15.08.110, the Council fixed a time and place for the, public hearing and the Recorder published notice and posted notice in the area to be vacated; and WHEREAS, notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all owners in the affected area, as described in ORS 271.080; and WHEREAS, the Council,' having head a hearing on June 23, 1986, finds the public interest will not be 'prejudiced by the vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and TMC Section 15.08.130; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate the right-of-way area because the public interest will not be prejudiced; and W1419REAS,' the Council finds that the following condition is necessary to vacate said 'land: The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this ordinance and it shall not be effective.until 'a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Section i s The Tigard City-Louncil 'hereby orders the vacation of that portion of right-of--way area known as SW Gonzaga Street between 68th and 69th Avenues as described on the attached Exhibit "A and shown on the attached Exhibit and by this reference made parts hereof. Section __2_ The Tigard City Council further orders that the vacation be subject to the following condition: ORDINANCE NO. Page I. lc�I3896A •. The vacation shall not be effective until the effective date of this L' ordinance and it shall not be effective until a certified copy of this ordinance has been recorded with the Washington County Clerk, Assessor, and Surveyor. 5ecti n 33: In no situation' shall this ordinance be effective until the 31st day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Payor. PASSED: By ,, ., vote oil all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this dash of c 1986. y Recorder APPROVED.D. This _�3_,r s day of ^a 1986. Cook, Mayor e ORDINANCE NO. 86- 33 r Page JW/3896A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 36— f i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 AND CHAPTER7, OF THE CIVIL INFRACTIONS I E €HEREAS, on April 14, 1.386, the City Council passed Ordinance 86-20, adopting the Civil Infractions Ordinance; HEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Civil Infractions Ordinance so as to remove from the code enforcement officer(s) the discretion to reduce the amount of a civil pee-jalty, that authority to reside solely with the code hearings officer; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish the; amount of the security deposit for a hearing under the Civil Infractions Ordinance at $50.€0; THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 5D(2)(b)(i.v) shall be amended to react as follows: Language to be added is shown in [brackets] and language to be deleted is underlined. (iv) The date, time and place at which the hearing on the infraction is to take palace, an explanation of the respondent's obligation to appear at the hearing, and that amount of the security fees required for the hearing [;] is $50.00, subject to waiver as oaroarided in sE 3 b Section 2: Section 5D(2)(c)(iii) is amended to read as follows: (iii) A notice that if the respondent denies having committed the alleged infraction and requests a hearing on the date indicated on the front of the summons, [the] security fees [appropriate for the charge] in the amount of 5O OO must accompany the denial [;], subject to waiver as ' provided in 5E(3}{b} Section 3: Section 5D(2)(b)(i.ii) is amended to read as follows: (iii) The infraction with which the respondent is charged, the class of the infraction and the maximum civil penalty for the infraction. [The code enforcement officer is authorized to reduce the amount of the penalty when paid by the respondent pursuant to Section 5D(2)(c)(iv)]. Section 4: Section 50(2)(c)(iv) is amended to read as follows: (iv) A notice that, if the respondent admits having committed the alleged infraction as charged, cash, a check or a . money order in the amount shown on the (rant of the __ summons, must accmpany the admissionf,] .[except ,that the respondent` will be further - notified of the cone enforcement officer's authority to reduce the penalty � � : pursuant to Section 50(2)(b)(;ii)), ORDINANCE NO. 86--,;y Page.1 I Section"5: Section 5E(2)(a) is amended to read as follows: 3 (a) If the respondent' ad�r.its the infraction, the respondent fray i ra fiats answer an the back of each summons and complete the app E, forward the summons to the civil infraction hearings office. Cash, a check or a money order:: in the amount of the civil penally for the infraction, as shorn on the front of the summons, shall be submitted with the answer. [unless the respondent and code a penalty r�duetion enforcement officer reach T agreement on pursuant to Sections 5D(2)(b)(iiiand 5Q(2)(c)(iv)3. An appropriate order shall, be oru�s of the civil entered in the rec infracton hearings officer indicating the receipt of the civil penalty k. PASSED: By •. � �ye.�� n� vote of all Council members present after beim read by numb and title only, this d�;�� day � of , 1986. ° (APPROVED: Tris _a�3� day of � 1986. q Cook, Mayor (2580P ti ORDINANCE NO, 86-jS Page;2 S 4 SIGH! UP SHEET FOR VISITOR'S AGENDA ITEM EM ## Visilar's Aera speakers ,are to be minutes or less please. € Name MPddre�, 4 AL i { 4 EM di SIGN UP SHEET FOR AGENDA IT Name Address 9 �, i i 1 z - - SIGN UP SHEET FOR AGENDA ITEM'# � NameAddress ff� r � " i _ _ 4 - B➢ CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY- . - AGENDAOF, June 23, 1386 AGENDA ITEM ff: DATE SUBMITTED: June 2, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance` — t3eclarire the Ci4:y°s Election to PREPARED BY: Jerri L. Widner Receive State Revenues REQUESTED BY: -JerriL. Widner � DEPARTMENT HEAD Off CITY ADMINKSTRA"fQR: p POLICY ISSUE Does the City want to receive State revenues, INFORMATION SUWIARY - - ... Each year the State requires two documents in order for cities to share in State revenues. One document is an ordinance declaring the City's election to receive the ' revenues (attached) and the resolution certifying that the City provides services qualifying for State shared revenues ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Decline receiving State revenues. 2. Accept ,r�eceivi.ng State revenues, SUGGESTED ACTIO! I recommend pa3saga of the attached ordinance. (JLW:cnl35) r `t ; CITY OF TIGARD `OREGON r COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF June 23, 1986 AGENDA ITEM N: DATE SUBMITTED: June 2, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: — ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution Certifvinc,Lthe City Provides Services PREPARED BY: Jerri L. Widner _ Qualifyinc for State Shared Revenues REQUESTED BY: Terri L.-Widner DEFARTMIENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Does the City want to receive State revenues. INFORMATION SUM14ARY Each year the State requires two documents in order for cities to sharp- in State revenues.' One document is an ordinance declaring the City's Election to receive the revenues and the resolution (attached) certifyingthat the City provides services qualifying for State shared revenues. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Decline receiving State revenues. 2. Accept receiving State revenues. SUGGESTED ACTIO! ; I recommend passage of the attached resolution. i (JLW:cnl35) SEE 1b NIN HF. P CITY OF-TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA I•FEM S!!i` i RY AGENDA OF: June 23 1986AGENDA ITEM fl: 3 �r�v��e-� DATE SUBMII"TcB: June ?4, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Budalet Committee ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Revised Resole-- Recomrsenrlation than A roving he Bud at., Kaking PREPARED BY: Jerri L. Widner Aunropriations and DeclarirS the Ard REQUESTED BY: Bob Jean Valorem :Tagg Layy for L986-87. DEPARTMENT HEAD OX: CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE N/A INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a revised resolution for budget appropriations based on your discussions of .lune 1£, 2986, ALTERNATIVES Cos,dSIDEREB N' SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend passage of the attached resolution. (JLW:rn/35) Attachment CITY OF TIGA€XD, OREGON ire COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: :.dune 231 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: May 23, 1986PREVIOUS ACTION: Passed Resolution ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW Gonzaqa rte' Calling For Public Hearing Street Right-of-way Vacation Public PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson Hearing (between 58th & '69th Ave.)_ REQUESTED BY: Donald Pollock DEPARTMENT HEAD OK CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _ POLICY ISSUE Council initiated Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted; by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 12, 1986, Council passed Resolution No. 86-57 to call; for ,a public hearing on Council initiated request to be held at 7:00 PM on 6/23/86. Staff requested a Council initiated vacation to vacate the right-of-way of Gonzaga Street between. '60th & '69th Avenues. No objections were filed by utility companies. Planning Commission and: the Engineering Division have recommended approval. The hearing was published in the Tigard Times according to City and State requirements and all abutting and affected property owners have been notified by mail. All fees will be paid by Donald Pollock Investments prior- to recording of the ordinance. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve vacation request as shown. 2. Approve vacation request with amendments. 3 Request staff to prepare resolution denying proposed vacation based on objections and remonstrances received during the public hearing. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends'alternate #1. Motion to approve ordinance as presented, t lw/3896A f MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGOW TO: Mayor and City Council June 10, 1906 FROM: Randy C.larno, Engineering Services Manager SUBJECT Street Vacation Report—Gonzaga Street (from SW 68th Avenue to SW 59th Avenue) ThPoi Engineering Division recommends the vacation known as "Sins Gonzaga Street (SW Guth to SW 69th)" be approved without special conditions. This recommendation is based on the following findings: (a) There is no effect ora traffic, circulation, pedestrian car bicycle No response was received from fire or police relative to response time; ( a) Drainage in the area can be adequately provided for without w, use of public easements in the vacation area; (c) No response was received from any utility company relative to existing or Proposed facilities in the vacation area; (d) The proposed vacation is not contrary to the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan; and (e) The vacation is not contrary to the Capital Improvements Plan. Reviewed and Approved: P Randall R. Dooley Deputy Director/city Engineer Community Development RSC:bs8 y? $F f �Ml ORANHUM CITY of TIGARD, OREGON To. ,Randy Clarn Keith Lidera DATE:' FROM: Lowen Wilson, Recorder SUBJECT; Street Vacation Report GONGAGA `STREET (68TH & 59TH) The attached letter was sent to property owners today ._ advising thew of the proposed street vacation public hearing scheduled before Council on _ s -s Please prepare an Engineer's Report and Plwining Commission t.` recommendation for that Council meeting. LW5 1.> ►`'C,—h �' r TIFARD , OREGON 25 Years:af�r�� May 23, 1986 1961-1986 Ret STS Conzaga Street'Vacation Public Hearing Dear Property Owner: The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, Tune 23, 1986 at 7:00 PH at' theTigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Bind., Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of the above mentioned street right-of-way.' (See enclosed location map.) cosy interested person may appear and be heard P , for or against the proposed vacation of said lands. Any written objection or remonstrance shall be filed with the City Recorder by .Rune 23, 1986 at 5:00 PM at the Civic Center. The vacation requested was initiated on May 12, 1986 by the Tigard City Council at the request of Donald E. Pollock Investments to return the land to private ownership. This is needed for commercial development of an adjacent' parcel. The legal description of the parcel to be vacated is also attached for your information. If you need further information, please contact my office, or Mr. Randy Wooley the City Engineer, Sincerely, 1 Loreen R. Wilson City Recorder lsr/3894A CC: ' Planning Department City Engineer s - 13125 SW Nall Blvd.,P.O.Cox 23397.Tigard Orego! 97223 (503)639-4171--- a ' s.:-�. ^Mn:�:-'� +1w,s>; :ast�. a .a'Fe,"�.�.' r-- ,�__'fi."i.,� ts ,.,",:aYx •.si.�* x;,r atc %`. cxaz=nm. �V '. � stu,, St��tc F �r �t K a Q; � r Gol , x 5 I �k st 2 3� '�� . 4 " y.,..r, .. .ryv •R5 -T•.',S 'Y- fY1�Y � .6TH �� -..-. _ ,� "�_ - '=?wry' �, xr�. ,�'S,x�r.-.-,: - ,.r3'> m. � �:1 �e�`e'�,�' �i'k�`s �.a _r� �t e•� �, tea, [��x �s�� `r3''i�+ -F'w.r � .'; - ".. -�s'�xz- � � ��{�• .• � .' �� "' �'�� i r��t,J.`v�, .,r,.<��;�.:�, x. ,,-. rYi"�.riy.�.s"��`'s ��r "r a .�,.. .- EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF S.W. GONZAGA STREET CITY OF TIGARD A parcel of` 1and 'in the plat "of WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, Washington County , Gregon; the said parzFt being all of S.W. Gonzaga Street {Seventh Street" betweenS.W.' 58th' ;venue (Washington Street) and S.'�. 69th Avenue (,Grant Street) , in said plat described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Block 32; thence, North 02` 33' 06" East!, a distance of 60.00 feet, to the Southwest corner of Block 29; �henc , South 87" 28' 47" East, a distance of 199.97' feet to the Southeast corner of Block 29; thence, South 02° 33' 17" West, a distance of 60,00 feet, to the Northeast corner of Block 32, thence, North 87° 28' 47" West, a distance;of 19`3.97 feet to the point of beginning, The parcel of land to be vacated being approximately 0,275 acres. REGISTEMED PROFESSIONAL OAECO 0.t KEITH G. Tt;Gt,PSr}h: 135ti MIII Aim "m _ ..r i� P¢ j ... CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 23' 1986 AGENDA ITEM'#: DATE SUBMITTED: June 13, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Request to Re--name Sw 113th Ave to Sal Gallo Ave PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno — REQUESTED BY: Residents of Sid 113 Ave. DEPARTPREJT HEAD Ott: -•! .', CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE— - -- INFORMATION SUMMA Ry In late Barth, 1986, ,staff received a request from residents on S.W. 113th Avenue (attached) to change the name of. S.W. 113th Avenin to S.W.' Gallo Avenue (see attached vicinity map). Staff subsequently evaluated the request and :.. sent a favorable recommendation to PlanningCommission.. As rewired by ORS 227.120, the Planning Commission must make a recommendation to the City Council for a final determination. The Planning Commission heard the matter on 'Rasa 20, 1986 and Janne 3,` 1986 and recommended that the street name change be approved (at the time of this writing, Planning Commission minutes were not available). fLTERNgTIVES CONSIDERED 1. Concur, with the Planning Commission's recommendation and pass the attached Ordinance officially changing the street name. 42. Deny the Planning Commission's recommendation and direct staff to prepare a Resolution (as required by OSIS 227.120) for future Council adoption, stating such denial. SUGGESTED ACTION The Engineering Division recommends trait Council concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation and pass the attached Ordinance changing S.W. 113th Avenue to S.W. Gallo Avenue as described. (2631P) —�. P't'y r .`'Ll'�- .•� / �.1 t � i �.r^,. IA'AYNTMR sxt11� 71 J I v a W ASL � L SCALE1_ x ' � 80 ' Mr T fjF a r 1 uaa rte _ A� a i :iTj ��_�l T"`/'-'-1 �„� t�WW1n <h+fQ_�= . ! p ✓. - I�•!t 1{ 541 EURlw."Ly501tY8� �W LWESt� Opf I..J y �,\ i 9tA�3T : , y .�£��,, r'1 lcrmsaG-t"!r '. L I"�t�\'rt t � � r-i 1"..�.___- _ J —�' /�.j\• 1 �._'�'�.�ts. F �_�` ,r.�-T— /a �- � � �_ � �� V/g i iAO.O.al.,'it� •.::_,`\ \��i�' !�-1< aar wEe.�t� Lsr_.J� �6:+ T� E � -•��`�• rL.Y.1 � T ! L i.issi Aeiwnva s'' y ` \\�. - OR FOWL JUNI L��...�{1 P .� k uMPR£R SH SCHOOL ' J, WP. iK3t PL Z ! a ,\ TV .� � t A rT � � �j e T i 1..,.oaf � `"� S rt Mrtv90(Pa �3plr( //S'-f T•�` •, ra I _ .. Wta��.� 1 1-"�� r. � �.> �} ...y I � *��/+!X ^psi�: t r 1 7\wet”L'.L ocasv w,uj It1 i i i �_. '� ` \' �•. \. ,� � (. � �4�, � 7,� �� i,g�//''jW �(�... j� \..� ^ t�li tea• ��,� � I S } ''�~ f.1` 1 rt r� �( �\ e l�\•, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON € COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: .June 23 1956 AGENDA ITEM 9: DATE SUBMITTED: June 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Hearings Officer, ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Pacific aor)roti!?1 Frontier Wold Markets CU 1-86, PREPARED BY: Keith Liden SL 5-86 and M 1-86 REQUESTED BY: NPO # 1 Anp tiled DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY At a hearing held on April 24, 1986, the Hearings Officer approved the above application subject to conditions. NPO N i; appealed this decision to ,City Council an May 29, 1986. Enclosed are copies of the applicant's submittal, staff" report, the Hearings Officer's decision, a" letter from the applicant regarding the proposed lot lineadjustment' with the City, and the NPO 1 appeal letter. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Uphold the Hearings officer- decision 2. Modify the Hearings Officer decision. 3 Overrule the Hearings Officer decision and deny the request. S SUGGESTED ACTION Uphold or modify the Hearings officer decision as appropriate. 18/dj RESOLUTION NO. 06— Page 3 S f A Ke th Liden ;�ssoc; ate planner aner r�lanrri a,g' Departsner.t Caty of Tigard ` P.O. :j3ox X3337 ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Liden; Re- Notice of Final Orders Sy Hearings Officer Case No. : CL 1-86, S-L 5-i36, and M 1-86 : pac 3 f a c Fri+r+t i er- Wood !'Market s/Robert Randall Co- Pacific o. �- Dated 5-16-F36 Final aro i°+ay 29, 11986 1986 The NPO 1 f orr+gal ly requests a Not ice of Appeal orFc2t it ion for of the above referenced deciai,Pn- Tars '1 feels, 'tirat i� has s ant ;�rre lr dri- ax e'F titer. its - : '3.k .l'S�exaxct' prcrpert isi1br ' a :Ifi�pd5 w. 1 '»mat ivat by the Ci wy Of Tigard 3aa^3 S. €dip® '$€1 was present -,rid t est id the Y`�� y schedcx3e.�'d meeting' cif April 24; '1986 'when $he app7,icast.ion cactae before vise Hearings Officer. The NPO1 #1 at its speciaray which meeting of May =8, 1986 t there was at least 24 hr public noticeD +v� ed by a vete of =m yes to .0 rut kms, submit, a Notice of Appeal or Petitsfor ►��vi�rs� oft3ae Hearings officer Decision= The ip^a3 cyr Review is based on the following; 1 CEt; the second pare c,s tite Hearings Officer findings, lines iris :y) t 6�c>sec "d page industrial zoneq" at•e Ce�� n' 3n fact, th" prOpert:Y is ie,cated in the Central Busimi�mt. i$ rir_t. The c,iistinctican is irfipor tent in that permitted use , .are q:x:te different. We feel this needs to be a0rend0d. r. it}6 r e !°arence=> tt,r� , .tinu+i+.tgtilewral. rAment Csr;f� Ite ' n zi We 1'2f=7 t �t l-. �'tZ iPYct:r':kI Businessa�T he � rtarr ; alrnits.ng uses Instc•r age .fczlatzs stacatxT be ii~rc r s^ to ' a ottr3 �sr^st�rd ti rid;that: thel�� vii§gam:�Jlr ? R F f 4 place a condition Of approval restricting the construction of pluoibinq 'Facilities; bathrooms or wastewater disposal facilities for the new facility. This does not aPPear ir, the decision. 4. The pr^anting of a lest lime ad,]ustF"ent (M 1-86) appears to be a part of the conditiorIal use aRproval (CU 4-88) aced r sensitive lands approval (Sb. 5-86): We feel the lot line adjustment of public prosper"'ty, should be heard by Cour,e;i in ra i public forum. There does not appear- to be any J i.ist i f icat i on for trading tax payer owned -property. in general the NFIO #1 is not opposed to the c, nstr ,_icti ,r-, 01 mini-storace units. The conditions that would r)r ohibit expa existingnon-conformi.no uses ch. r, t �•npear t, ae in farce or ,adequately described in the decis;-r- . We also feel that the lot line adjustment issue ShOUld ga ` before the City Council. We would, appreciate' your forv�ar^dinr� a request £ :r waiver- of fee to to Citty Council for >con9iderat ion. T n ou' fo ur assistance. t t �Ch irperscr , NPO #i r a ts' t t.: i, d: �the ob2rt ldall company 1 + Kristin Square @ 9500 S.W.Barbur Blvd.a Suite 300 m Portland,Oregon 97219 (503):245-1131 "telex 1360557 April 29, 1986 " "• + ) Robert J n City A inistrator +` I.ilifih;l3 1 City Tigard t P,!`�F'JilV tai P.O. Bozo 233x97 Ti rd, Oregon 97223 Rd: Burnham Business and Storage _ Dear Aar. Jean: Recently PacificFrontier Wood Markets and the Robert,Randall Company applied for approval of three land use actions' relating to Burnham Business and Storage at 8900 S.W. Burnham, Tigard. At the .public hearing April 24, the hearing officer orally. approved all tactions, 'yr subject to conditions. The written report willlb be issued' shortly. One of the requested actions is a lot line adjustment, which .had been discussed previously with Bill Monahan and with Tim Ramis. We propose to "'trade" a 16-foot wide strip of property owned by the city, on which we Aave a prescriptive access easement benefiting our property, for undeveloped property in the floodplain, which the 'city will use for its park on Fanno Creek. T enclose a copy of our site plan showing the subject property. Reith Liden has additional information on the proposal. We ask that the ,proposal be submitted to the City Council for its approval. Please let me know what we should submit, beyond this letter, to obtain approval for the trade. Thant: you very much foryour help. Very truly yours, `/ Marilyn,R. Bishop enclosure w, CC: Reith Liden e e CITY OF"TIGARD rY Washingeon County, Oregon s NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER = BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Wvrnber(s): CU 1-$5, SL :S-86, and N 1-86 2, Name of owner: Pacific Frdntier Wood MarketsJRobert Randall Co- 3. Name of Applicant: Same Address 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. S 300City Portland Statet)?Z Zip 97-- 4. Location of Property: Address' 8850 3360, 8870, 8890, 3900, and 8930 SW Burnham Legal Description 1SI 2AD lots 2200, 3000; 2S1 2DB 'lot 2000 5. Nature of Application: Fur :l Conditional Use and SenSitive l:attdS i'c•rr:it to expansion of a mini-warehouse that will partially be within :the 100 ve,tr'ilee ,i Also, to adjust a 6-,534 sq. ft.- parcel owned by the Crty of Tr9arrf .0 r ? ;. parcel owned by the applicant, into two parcels of 2,214 sq. it. e, 5.01 :nre 6. Action Appreslral a requested zoned t'fil) (t'rntr.:l AX _ Approval with conditions I�r s t r i t .) Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted 3t City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX owners of record within .the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization. XX Affected ,governmental agencies 8. Final'Decision: n THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON May 29, .1956 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS F1LFI) The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the 'Planning Department Tigard City ball . 1:3125 SW tiall Blvd. , P.O Box 23377 Ti.sar•d , Oregon. 97223. 9, Appeal: Any party to tyre decision may appeal this decision it, accordance with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 -whicth providz:s that f: written rippi,10 may be tiled within<LO days after notice i-+ given grid s+ nt Thf. deadi :nc for filing ,t an appeni is 2:30 i'.M lo, qut!,!�tiorts: if you have any questions, please call thea City Of Tignt'd talenning'Dep�artment, 639-41/1. Y ti t BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION) � FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, A ) No. SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT, AND I.' ) LOT LINE 'ADJUSTMENT TO EXPAND AN) CU 1-86; SL 5-86; M 1-86 EXISTING 141NI-WAREHOUSE:PARTIAL-) LY WITHIN THE 100-:YEAR ;FLOOD } PLAIN OF FANNO GREEK; Pacific' ) Frontier Wood Markets, applicant) The above-entitled matters came before the Hearings Officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 24, 1986, at the Tigard School District Offices Conference Room, in Tigard, OreJo,, and The applicant requests a conditional use permit, a sensitives lands permit and a lot line adjustment to expand an existing mini-warehouse ,project partially within the 100 year flood plan of Fanno Creek and to adjust a 3.15 acre parcel owned bythe City of Tigard and a 5. 51 acre parcel ownedby the applicant into two parcels of 2. 99 and 5. 67 acres, property Located at: r 8850, 8860, 8870, 8890, 8900, 8930 SW Burnham, property mora specifically described as Tax Lots 2200 and 3000, Dap 2S1-.!AL) 1 . and Tax Lot 2000, Map -2S1-2DB, Cit-r of Tic ard, County of-+• ashi1,,1t,4::, Sate of Oregon; and The Hearings Officer conducted a' public hearin:.i on Apr3.1 14 , 1986, at which time testimony, Evidence and the I'lannin.j Staff Report were received; and :I ' The hearings Officer adopts the findintis- of _ z� t, ,ani clusions contained in the Staff Report, a copy of which is .-it.t .�� ? < i i' Page _1 CU 1-86; SL 5-86; 14 1-86 4 hereto marked "Exhi'bit A" and incorporated by reference herein; t.. The Hearings Officer further finds that while objections were raised to the ;project that it violated the code requirements y z the Hearings Officer finds that by limiting the uses to mini- storage uses; that the development will be consistent with those uses' allowed in commercial industrial zones`, together with the earlier conditional_ uses which were aprovea on -the subject. pro- perty. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that CU 1-86, SL 5-36, and M 1-86 °be and hereby areapprovedsubject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING OR FILL "PEIUMITS. {„ 2 Standard IzaZf-stree. improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, 'storm drainage and uti_liti�e shall be' installed along the SW Burnham Street frontage. Said improvements along SW Burnham Street shall be build to City Major Collector Street standards and conform to the alignment of etiistinci improvements. , 3. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement con- struction plans and one (1) itemize6 construction cost esti:m, ta, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil ngincer,' detailing all proposed public improvements shall ne submitted to the Enqineerirro s Section for approval. The Tics-t:ie.i pedestrian trail alone V, nno Creek shall be included with the-s(. p1-1111s. - <'' 4. Construction of proposed public IMprovemcznt.s shall not commence t �a: the Frit:t7t)CC'.:T"ltl!S 1�iV].sinn has issued apprC)vet ull 4.11 aft Z.el the ...._ � �y r,acle 2 CU 1--86 Flt, 5-86 f1 1-1sG �k t public improvement plans. 'rhe Division will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond, the payment of a ;permit fee and a street light fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concur- rently with the issuance of approve€i public improvement plans. SEETHE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING N,C7RE SPECIFIC INFORIMATIO1I REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. 5. An as-built drawing of all grading shall be submitted upon completion' of' work within the floodplain. 5. The public improvement plans shall detail grading and sail stabilization improvements for work proposed within ;the floodplain. 7. No work shall occur within the floodplain. from October lst through April 30th unless specifically authorized, in writinc7, by the 'City Engineer. 8. All-new uses established on the property shall conform with Community-Devel'opment 'Codereauirements and restrictions. 9. The applicant shall submit a modified site plan fol Director approval which provides sufficient land to enable the construction of a trail on the north side of Fanno Creek as note,i in condition 3 'above, 10. A landscaping plan for the area to be develc�ped sIi.i i l 1 , submitted for Planning- Director approval, which plan shill bli1 : s , the developed area from the Fanno Creek Park. 11. The applicant: shall obtain the necessai e zmi U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the Division of Star.e Page 3 - CtJ 1-86; SL 5-85; M 1-86 f 12. The area below the resulting 100 year floodplain shall : be dedicated as greenway to the City of Tigard. A monumented boundary survey showing all new title lines shall be prepared by a professional land surveyor and submitted to the Engineering Division for review and 'approval. 13. The new legal description for Tar. Lots 2200 and 3000 shall be prepared for Engineering Division review and approval PRIOR to recording the lot line adjustment with Washington County. 14. A City Business Tax shall be paid by any business' operating on the subject property. : 15. Section 18.114. 100 of the Code requires that all tempo- � ;. nary signs have valid temporary permits obtainable from the City. The applicant shall notify all tenants of this reauirement so that tenants are in compliance with the Code. 16. The Decision is valid if exercised within one year of the €inal approval date. 17. There shall be no parking between the end of the existing - building and the edge of the property on the Fanno Creek side " d, except for the loading and unloading of goods and materials into the mini-warehouse units. There shall be absolutely no parking in those areas for other business uses and the pavement shall be marked accordingly. / ;DATED this K' (<<. day of B'lay, 1986. HEARING �6FFICER 4; APPA6VE �'— ETH MASON ,. Page 4 - CU 1- 86; SL, 5-86; ti L-86 X , TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER APRIL 24, 1986 - 7:00 PM TIGARD SCHOOLDISTRICT OFFICES CONFERENCE ROOM 13137 SW Pacific HwY- (Next to Schuckbs & 'Dairy Queen Tigard, OR 97223 1. Call to order 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2.1 CONDITIONAL USE CU 1-86, SENSITIVE LANDS SL 5-8E, AND LOT LINE ADJUST14ENT M 1-86 PACIFIC FRONTIER WOOD MARKETS Location: 8850, 8860, 8870, 8890, 8900, 8930 SW Burnham (§CTM 2S 1 2AD lots 2200, 3000, WCTM 2S 1 MB, lot 2000) 3 Other Business 4. Adjournment a STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2.1 APRIL 24, 19€36 HEARINGS OFFICER TIGARD SCHOOL DIST. OFFICES-CONFERENCE ROOM 13137 SW `PACIFIC HIGHWAY (NEXT TO SCHUCK'S 6 DAIRY QUEEN) TIGARD, ,OREGON 97223' A. FACTS, 1. General information CASE: Conditional Use CU 1-86, Sensitive Lands SL 5-86, Lot Line Adjustment M 1-86. REQUEST: For approval of the expansion of an existing mini-warehouse that wi11 be partially within the ;100 year flood plain. Also, to adjust a 3.15 acre parcelowned by the City of Tigard and a >5.51 acre parcel owned by the applicant into two: parcels of 2.99 acres and 5.67 acres. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District).. APPLICANT: Pacific Frontier blood Markets OWNER: SAME 9500 SW Pacific Highway City of Tigard Suite 300 Portland, OR 97219 LOCATION: 8850, 8560, 8870, 8890, 5900, 8930 SW Burnham (WCTM 2S1 2AD T.�. 2200, 3000, WCTM 2S1 2DB, T.L. 2000) 2. Background Numerous land use applications have been received by the City regarding the property. A Conditional Use (CU 2-74) was 'approved by the City for construction of three mini-warehouse buildings on the subject property. ' Several commercial and industrial businesses have been approved through the Conditional Use process (CU 7--75, CU 24-.76, CU 38--77, and CU 6-79) . During this time, the property was zoned M-4 (Light Industrial) and it was designated for Corrimer•cial-Industrial de=velopment in the Plan for Neighborhood Planning Organization }11. In approving these request, the Planning Commission used the following criteria: a. Less than three employees b. No on-site sales C, No manufacturing or assembly uses d. Low traffic :generation e. One Len square foot wall mounted sign c;l'AFE RE-F�OtiI CU 1 136, S1 5-86,-M 1-90 POLI 1 F ON In 1980, Sensitive i_ands { approval t+sas r. (M '_s©) and Site Design Review granted to expand the r (SDR 32-80) development never took lade, existing facility, but the Current Comprehensive Plan and Comm unity epevelopmentr, 1983, he ci As a City adopted the this process. the zoning designation for the part of area was Chan ged' to CBD (Central Business District) Property and surrounding . vicinity Information The Properties on the northeast side of d arno Creek parcels which lie on the opposite side of the :creek are zoned ded UD. The Partially developed with and Side and multiple family residences. l3urntlam Street abuts the 'property on the east. i 4. Site Information and Property Description The property is developed with three mini-warehouse buildings which have a portion of total square footage g devoted to commercial and non conforminc3 industrial uses that were approved by the City as noted above. �- The applicant is proposing to extend each of the three buildings toward � Fanno Creek. A ,new accessroad is proposed around the enol of Proposed additions The buildings will be located above thethe Year flood present loo } Main elevation of Fanno Creels and the proposed access road wi11 be within the flood flooding y ih In order to mitigate any negative g problems caused b overflow channel is y the to of the road, intended to be excavated with the flood Plain areal. In addition, the applicant i land, that belongs to the City to obtain a 16 foot wide 'strip of applicants' y, which abuts the northern r boundary e n property, bounds p r o y" f y a the t f 5. Agency arid. REPO Comments i The Engineering Division has the following comments: ah. Burnham Street is' a major collector street and half street improvements should be required. b 7-he Location of the 100y ear flood plain ,boundary after the proposed construction is not clear on the submitted drawing. C. A. .visual buffer• should be installed between thre project .and the flood plain area. a. d' 'tic 100 Year flood plain is designated the City. Room should be g d for park purpose by theit provided, along the north s idt� of posed overflow Channel for pedestrainfbicycle p.+th development. e. A permit from the obtairCor Lands must baa ps of Engineers and Division of Staf.e uad prior to initiating work within the Hoed pain, M 1 -85 _• Pf�(;F __ t'• the area below theresulting .100 year flood Plain boundaryt must be dedicated to the City. k.., g. An as--built drawing of all grading shall be submitted of all grading and soil stabilization work. h• No work should occur with the flood plain between October 1st and April' 30th unless authorized by the City Engineer, a The Building Inspection Division notes that the method for connecting to sanitary and storm sewer must be determined prior to building permits. issuance of The Tigard Water bistrict has no objection to the proposal. The Park Board does riot recommend the use of any of the area within the 100 year flood, plain for non—recreational purposes. Comments from NPO #1 will be available at the hearing. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This application consists of three components which inc]ude Conditional Use to allow an expansion of a mini-warehouse, a Sensitive Lands Per-nii.t to allow land form alteration within the 100, year, fl, d Plain, and a Lot Line Fldjiastment to modify the bounder property and the City of Tigard y of the e north. The rsbect oposed development is in conformance with rtthe P^applicable requirements relating to lot coverage, building setbacks, building height, access, visual clearance, and the supplemental criteria contained in Chapter 18. 130. The proposal is consistent with Policies 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2-3, and 7. 2. i Of the Tigard -Comprehensive Plan because the proposed concL�ptual design indicates that no adverse impacts will result and the plain elevation will not rise. Addi ].00 year flood tional engineering information will be necessary to confirms this conclusion, but the Engineering Division is confident: that the proposal can be property accomplished. The preservation of wildlife habitat noted in Policy 3.4.2 will k,t, accomplished because the creek channel will not be affected and the graded areas will be stabilized and re—vegetated. Also, tho tlr,ny Corps/State review will include an analysis of will habitat and ensure that a impace upon wildlita 3. p Mitigation appropriate mita is provided. Policy `3.:3 be followed because is remaining land within the flood plain will be dedicated to the City. Policy lt)0 y` 'yr bicycle pedestr•iari y 3 5.$ calls for a Path which is r�s_cogrmended as a r_•onditiun of apprc,va;! Several athier• aspects of the proposal discussed below mu,t ba, r l,aril'rc,ri ur• amended to ensur-te cogipl:iW"e with City requiremaants, 57'Af I` NI.i�Uh l Cil i t;b, 1. Landscaping The existing landscaping on the site meets City requirements. However, the applicant must submit a landscaping Aslan for the area surrounding the new 'construction. This plan should provide for visual screening of the new driveway and buildings from the future r park area to the west. 2. Parking The development presently has 109 parking d th r---. ' $�•.Sw.^.cS ma�i4soe, eiipat'39 ion will require a total of 136. Although the parking spaces have riot been shorn, there appears to be sufficient room available to comply ,with.this standard. 3. Lot Line Adjustment This portion of'the application complies with CityStandards. The 16 forst wide area 'is presently used by the applicant for access to the rear :;; srtion of the subject property (T.L. 200). As indicated in the applicant's narrative, the City is willing to deed this strip over to the applicant, however, it is also the City's intent that this,would be 'traded " for land dedicated to the City along Fanno Creek for park. purposes. 4. Non Conforming Uses It is the intent of the City that the existing non-conforming uses within the three buildings can :remain as provided in Chapter 18.132 of the Code. The proposed additions shall not be used for other than mini-storage uses- as defined in Section 9.8.42.020 (d)(1)(C)(i). The non-conforming uses cannot be expanded. 5. Fanno Creek Park The proposed property line 'after dedication and the flood overflow channel conflict with the proposed development of the park trail system. A 'bridge has been installed immediately south of the property to extend the existing trail system to the north side of Fanno Creek. The property line location and the design and alig-R¢s�erit of the overflow channel need to be modified to accommodate the trail Since a trail connection is possible in this location, a bicycle/pedestrian trail should be constructed within the area to be dedicated as provided in Section 18.04.040 (a)(5) and (b) of the Code. The specific design and alignment of the trail should be determined in the field with the Engineering Division, C. RrCOMENDAi ION The Planning staff recommends approval of CU 1-86, SL 5-86, and M 1-06 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS 01-HERWI.SE NOTED, ALI. CONDITIONS SHALL. BE MET PRIOR 1-0 ISSUANCE OF BUILDING OR I ILL PERMITS. STAFF REPORT - CU 1--06, st. +�-:f1t,, m 1-86 Pl1Gt_ 4 y!_ R 2. Standard half—street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, t streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities shall be installed along the SW Ournh��i Street frontage. Said improvements along SW Burnham Street shall be built to City Major Collector Street standards and conform to the alignment of existing improvements. 3. Five (5) sets of plan—profile public improvement construction plans and :one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered professional Civil 'JEngineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section: for ' approval. The bicycle/pedestrian. trail along Fanno Creek ,hall be included with these plans. 4. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has issued 'approved public improvement plans. The Division will require posting of a ,`100% Perfbrmance Bond, the payment of a Permit fee and a streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuanceof 'approved public improvement plans. SEE TOE' ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGRRDING;'FEE SCt4EDULES BONDING AND AGFEE E4TS. 5. An as—built drawing of all grading shall be submitted upon completion of work within the floodplain. 6. The public improvement plans shall I detail grading I and soil stabilization improvements for work Proposed within the floodplain. 7 No work shall occur- within the flood plain from October tst through April 30th unless specifically authorized, in writing, by, the City Engineer. k 8 All new uses established on the property shall conform with Community Development Code requirements and restrictions. 9. The applicant shall submit a modified site plan for planning Director approval which provides sufficient land to enable the construction of a tr it on the north ,skip of Fanno Creek as noted in condition 3. above. 10. A landscaping plan for the area to the developed shall be submitted for planing Director approval. 11 . The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the U,S. Army Corps of Engineer's and the Division of State Lands. 1L. The area below the resulting p.00 year flood {Main shall be dedicated as greenway to the City of Tigard. A monumeret4acl boundary survey showing all new title lines shall be prepared by a , professional: land surveyor and submitted to ttie Enyin!?wrintj Division for review and approval. F STAf'!" REPOR F taU 1-06. =moi:. 5--06 M 1 96 'PA(A. 5 zk 13. The new legal `description' for Tax ®ts 2200 and 3000 shall be prepared for Engineering Division review ansa approval PRIOR to recordingthe Zoic liege adjustment with Washington County'. 14. A City gassiness Tax shall be paid by any business operating on the subject property. 15, Section 1R.114.100 of the Code requires that all temporary signs have valid temsugary permits obtainable from the City- The applicantAall notify all tenants of this require Iment so that enants are in compliance with the Cove The oici ion is valid if evercisa d within sane ,year of the final approval date. PREPARED BY: Keith laiden AP BY:;E4illiam A. Monahan Director of Planning & Serrior Planner Development (VSL:dj7) c STAREPORT 1-96, SL 5i 06, M 1-96 - PAGE 5" z�y C d A 46 A O 9 ' TIGARD pa, �;`A.''' sr @ fi •, CIVIC - �: CENTER a $ a: IMOD MOR T., o •'1 ti ' rya �s! •i sw. a { P a5 J Sw E ftrOCM•. s a NCA i. - 1 y 9 • R4 `f f 4 ITT- e -.r-� `u n � ' t �S 6AfENSW nd-1_� •t`ll �� `��y Y ,- �{TElR- I.t E J� , OK i= ST TUALITY � } Ytl90dt �utup�.t�,V% HIGH SCHOOL _ sr. TEMPLETON �h- ♦ iii I I. 1 ELEMENTARt Tu we SCHOOL p _z .sem} ,;.!A1_7 a} . w 1 q _T-Ttss } } nGki.YN C 'f \j - _ aT.LIN6 l { R � j'lOfA�9Tltl�T�� LL� cb TLEa L l . LL l .L Fla n i4Nf LF .MNAHG •t__� F S @}38 ODE!t ,.. ; t daff company Msdn Square a 9500 S.W.Barbur Blvd.o Suite 300 Portland,Oregon 97219® (503)245=1131 T21a -160557 April 1, 1986 City ,bf Tigard. 12755 S.W. Ash P.a. .Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 City Council Members and Staff: The Robert Randall company and Pacific Frontier wood Markets propose to enlarge the three buildings that presently comprise Burnham Business & Storage, located at 8900 S.W. Burnham in Tigard. The buildings, which occupy Tax Bot 2200, Map 2S 12AD3 will be extended onto Lot 200, map 2S 12DB, up to the liras of the 100-year floodplain: we propose to place an access driveway around the ends of the building within the 100-year floodplain`. In con junction with this proposal: we are applying for $ three land -use actions by the City of Tigard: a conditional use approval` a sensitive lards permit, and a lot line adjustment. Each application is addressed separately below. Conditional Use Application We requL7st: conditional use approval to extend three s mini-warehouse buildings located at 8900 S.W. Burnham to the soutnweot, adding approximately 31,000 square feet to the existing storage area. The site of the proposed construction presently is unimproved except for a driveway around the `ends >. of the buildings. The extensions will be patterned after the existing buildings. Dimensions are shown can the site development; plan. The existing access drive from Burnham Street will serve the proposed development.. A paved driveway around the ends of the buildings will provide access at the rear for fire protection and other emergency services as well a8 ;f®r the tenants. we ,will, provide ;additionalparing spaces as required by the Community Development Code. Each of the three 'buildings` is already served by sewer and water. These ;services will be extended to the proposed additions. n .N-A: _ F t 's City of Tigard April. 1, 1986 «• Fuge Two s j� Sensitive Lands Ap2lication i The 3.04 acre Lot 200 is undeveloped. A -portion of the lot; is within the 100--year floodplain. Our proposed g construction will extend only up, to the floodplain boundary# as shown on the development plan.. We propose, however, to locate the driveway just wil- the floodplain boundary used to fill the driveway area only as necessary to provide safe access for emergency services. We will dig a corresponding mitigation channel. as ,shown on the site development plana to � preserve the existing floodway storage capacity. n _ We intend to dedicate the remaining area of Lot 200 to the Cite of Tigard in exchange for the lot lime adjustment � discussed below. The proposed new property boundary is �. shorn on the development plan. Lot Line Adu�tment ' The City of Tigard owns Lot 3000 of Tax Neap 2S 12AD. The southeasterly 16 feet of the lotare encumbered by an access easement benefiting our Lot 200 of Tax Map 23 12DS, which is, in part, the subject of these applications. City staff and the city attorney have expressed willingness to � transfer: this property to the Randall Company in exchange for our dedication of property in the flood plain to the city for use as a parka The 16 foot strip is already encumbered by K our access easement and therefore this trade seems to be a logical, as well as mutually beneficial,' one. The easement area is :shown on the development plan. ' Pursuant to the trade, we ask that the boundary of Tax Lot 200 be adjusted to include the area of the easement. Respectfully submitted, The Robert Randall Company Mari yry Ra aas o , x r p ,.y7f7, AA FRQ GL U �fS y rl. r 7 r � mmt a � t { 9 y IUI RUR� , IRt pfloqplo � olntRICI 11H ,�. P.O. BOX 127 TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 0 PHONE 662-2601 PACIFIC FRONTIER WOOD MARKETS April 18, 11786 8850 SW BURNHAM ST TI CrTY OF TIGARD 17elV- 1 Insp. Type RSW I TE Dear Keith L.iden, Thisletter is to notify you that a Site Plan Review has be6n conducted fair Burnham Business Storage Add'itton ire accordance` with Uniform Fire ,Code� Article '10 to establish required fire flow, hydrant location and street access for fire appara tale. Protide fires hydrant location sothat no part of a coarmer— Y e ial building is more than 250 feet Brom a hydrant. UFC 1€7 301(f`) Fire Department access roadways shall be not less. than 20 feed of unobstrut ted width. UFC 10. 207(m) areas of concern a3ro at rear of buildings where potential parking may inter- ...r fere with the required 20 furs swidth. No building shall be constructed which creates a noeded fire flora in excess of 3000 CPM. Exception: Either Inztal,l auto- i matic sprinkler protection throughout or install area sep- aration Fire walls as specified in Section 505(a) of the Uniform Building Code. UFt 10. 301€e3 Total area' an 3 adjacent nt floors, located between fire walls, shall not exceed 12, 345 square feet. Storage of flammable liquids in Group B occupancies shall ,not be allowed. The handling and use of; gasoline andother flammable liquids shall not be permitted unlosb such use and handling` complies with; the Uniform Fire Code. USC 708 If you have any questions regarding this letter, or if I may be of assistance '1n the future, please feel free to call m e at 662-2601. Sincerely,, a Serie 'Will naan Fire Prevention 'Bureau a Tigard, Oregon. April. 23, 1986 " City of Tigard. +0� Hearings jOfficer l2755 77. Ash � �f i l iJ Tigard, Oregon, 972..23. 4 Dear Sir`: PLI AN!Nlit 1)E'T This letter is in reference to FIVE NO. a SI, 5-86 and CU 1-86, concerning Pacific' Frontier and 'Hood Markets. We understand that the expansion of this warehouse does not conform to the City Code as some of the buildings aye being used for light industry which is in violation of the City Code. Also, it seems as though the City of Tigard is allowing too Diuch sand for ad�ustmen't when it is needed for the Public Works Department and the 'Greenway and Park System. About 1980, The Randall Corporation wanted to put a RV d tr:as turned down by the City of parking lot in this area an Tigardafter% meetings with the Planning Commission and the City Council. Why is the road so far dowry in the 100 year flood plain and not adjacent the buildings? Does this not cre ate potential po11® ution of Fanno Creek during the rainy season •when the runoff goes into the creek. Is this extra space intended to be used as a parking lot at a later date? A high fence should be required to protect the Greenway and ,Paris System and the large residential area looking dos�n upon the site. Allowing this much encroachment into the 100 year flood P 'would encourage the undeveloped property to south we�� to do 'the 'same thus destroying the Greenway mnd mark System and the natural<`habitat 'and wildlife in that', area. The large amount of fill ,dirt needed to-do the above would drastically affect the flood plain^. and flow :of Fanno Creek. Tank you for your understanding; and consideration. Sincerely, ~Paul E. Johnson Gloria Johnson. 2l C14-23 -S(® AnP ►�� poors 1-2) � � _ v � il7tiltga.I III g[fill lt ala{.1;a t{a alt ola ala t;a ala tTt r rft [IT= tit fit r tat a a r� a Irl T _�_ ; irj�l►].I [faT 0 g L I I�jria�agl(ti[�tltitla�t;alapa�ahliirla;Zgata�alala;'It;►ga;t�a;a�tta�a;tg NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED — g 2 3 6_ - 7 8 9 It0 6 I DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 12 THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO e;aiata.:;t THE QUALITY OF TaE ORIGINAL ' DRAWING. O£=6z -8Z cz 9Z sz 9z Ez ZZ IZ 02 6t99—LI 91 sr' ;rt EI Zt if o'._6 9 �__g_ s___.4 :narnuhau�tnalun�uuMWLusgmsNanh »ggtlife pH r — f ti 'a N'A R &-q H LL i _ ------------- PCE �,,, .t> •�,L7• __ �, ��.��'%,/ /'<' ) >� r R 1 _j p A 9F�AT NO,.AREA �• k� I � - - EN •�_OVE r +t 9 nE6,. _ .�` •`-' - j. ' - v ;'� _ ` IATURAL AREA --- CITY t m - C9TY6 a i 111 d / _. - YARD 1 ex/tDD{KD rt o0o 1CLA11 IIS T.ERr0y1VE.CEN7 ER`s / SENPOR h / ow .<< i • > o r77 IL TER _ - / t t9 i LILEIo r•, 0 50 00 200 300 PARK MASTER PLAN 01111111, 'mk oft TIGARD, OREGON _ irlil��t S�1i+0lsi�It+;Itl't(ilIIIII`I11tIItt 111111fill IF IrrTpT7jFpjIi1-Pop i.'1rjqIjqIl1+tyl'I'FrIIFIIil gP i;I+tI)It+`+l+llll lit+1+Ol i+f+'ll+i+i+ NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED r ,_..1. . 2 3 4 ._.- _ TJ .. - 6_ _ 7 9 ® t...._.. IZ DRAWING IS LESS CLCAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. OrE 62 8Z L2 8z 1 's'z Oz ez zz tz oz 6t 61 c( SI st bI El at 11- 01_B ® 1 9 S —ir E .z I�w 'rNlillllillll11IN101NoI11Ni1NiINNiiP�Iif1�0,�'�iet� +moi luNi;,--l._1u.;.I--i,•-la--I, + t + ,t I ,t I I + t f. � MARC": �•J 9 J Y1 yn a4 4 2 76 OVERFLOW CHANNEL / � � �� ✓� Occoco TU ADO/TION -- Q \ NEW BOEINDA Y EXISTING CREEK N ' ADDITION o ; / 0 - P20v, Z-07- z- G/NE r4 v✓. - F20N Gs ry of r/6.f.?O �/ Fo CG o o '� NE /DO YEAR FLOOD PLANE y k T \ ' :--_+�__�. yip aT> •.:. (>dt�tliltlt�lit tet�lel ee�l[t e`I�lel t[I�ttr IOt In r 1�1 i t r 11 1 1 1 till 1 r�rr a tie i � � t � �. I__ I Vin. ; i. fl Ijl Ipl 141 le,,el cel let c t tet e e t 1 1 t let 1 1 let t s >n .. NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO 111-E QUALITY QUALITY OF Tt£ ORIGINAL DRAWING. oFFe sz ez :z sz ez bZ _ez zz ea oz sr � - '�%II1111�811�11II�IIN�IIt1jtM��fll�t -1N,�'-'''-"t a 1 • 1 �t1tl�6Elaptlt6N t mARVC." i 1994 i � y- TOs TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RE a 113TH AVENUE STREET NAPE CHANGE � r fry-. FROMs JIM HOPKINS o RESIDENT MINE 23 D 1986 For several reasons, 'I urge you to approve the change of S-VI. i.l3th Avenue to S.W. Gallo Avenue. This proposal reflects some ;inoo aviende and pain for the residents of the street, but the change will make the situation more livable for us for the following reasons 1) Obviously someone has made a mistake for the streets to parallel-An i�°x the first vlace. (both 113th Ave. send 113th palace run Norton to South. The house number 11765 has been assigned to both: streets. My neighbor to the south's address is 11740-- - mine 17'4 3.m.mine is 11720. the other street has an address of 117)0.. . which creates s nusance with %many people searching for an address. 2) The added traffic due to the confusniorn is an unpedessary hazard to our children. . . we are located on the end of a non-thru street to have that safety. 3) The duplicate, parallel street '' pose a potential problem to emergency services personnel. . . that could lend to a tragic situation for the residents of either street. ) The mail and other deliveries are constantly being confused arising from; the situation. As _I mentioned there is some pain irn making these changes. . . lots of addresses to change. ..etc. . . but the change Is a prudent' and timely-one. We propose the change to Gallo Avenue with `good reason. . The street divides land that his family has owned and lived on since 1915- (Jim Gallo) He has lived on the property virtually ' ' all his life The city,engineer .i.nf orals me the street is off grid. . . therefore .couldn't receive a numbered name. . .Gallo iB just fine with us and ;honors the tradition of the neighborhood. Thank You for your time and consideration. Sincerely a 3 � ��tl �}1110, ARA P/ f SE,1/4 NE 1r4 s�cTsON 2 32s Ro w WM. !�IT✓ 1,/ WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE 1"=100 1100 SEE MAP \ .33 ac 2S 12AA C / 22 SEE MAP 1300 •6 `SOG %� f' �/j@," - 2S 1 2A8 95ae Ty02 . p'P ��+ oa F.; yr 404 x401 (nc :.9• ` / 896e 99a= '"�1204 Y �' 1400 •o''o '�'L I9:4 C.S.I:u.12 G941� .93 a uol :S b/1200 �®,J•_: lCSda+1201) 4 ,f Y Isco sra ate•/ 1203 C/ ' y 1601 u ; \�� :.J rT \IL 3/� q , B0C 1501 ''� 1600 1600 !Fc \ ems- ' ~ rolae 1700 A S.!25-7/4 ' J3f !4 �� $IAS, , SEE MAP ` 'A /'•'' /� 'o.. 2S 12AC ,o 2600 � .iaae \ / _ . 1100 2700 2900 '< .13 as 260'' -.`'� !• �:: Y\ 3000 iaa "e' •o .2. 113 Ap �� f�200 � a �eV4'�n g•. \ B U R 3 r } ,. 6. ^210C / �1'!y n 9nff•f df9fi �f STREET / SEE MAP t 25 1 206 •.',. ,res ° �f SEE MAP SEE MAP 2S 1 20B 2S I 2DA � MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON n TO: members of City Council June 16, 1986 FROM William A. ftnahan, Director, a rmunity Develo cnt SUBJECT: Iters 07 June 23_ 1986 Agenda At the request of the applicant, item 07 COD Zone Interpretation has been set aver• to the July 14, 1986 Council meeting. br30 'R. s CITY OF TIGARI3, ORECt?�i v ( COUNCIL AGENDA ITEP's Sts ARY 123, AGENDA i�F: Jun€ AGENDA ITEM SATE suRwITTED: June 13 1986 PREVIOUS ACTIOi1i: �. ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Intergovernment_, Areernent caith ir3ashingan County _ PREPARED 8Y: 4il agar. A. Monahan _ _ REQUESTED BY: Washington County x,71 CITY ADMINISTRATOR,. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: POLICY ISSUE ' Should the City enter into an intergovernment agreement with Washington County for the purpose of gaining jurgsciiction of a portion of [3urharn Road? ' INF'(?Rh�A'IoNSUMMARY consider the City`s request for transfer ed Washington County will conside jurisdictionof portion of Durham Road on July Z.' The County has proposed that Tigard enter into emn of intergovernmental for agreement your onsderation�owhich transfer. A draft agreement i s pr. the County Surveyor, and iCommunity t } represents a negotiation of terms by Development Staff. ALTERNIAT3VES rONSIDEPEC Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign on 1. Accept the Intergovernmental behalf of the City. 2. Propose modification to the agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign a revised agreement on behalf of the City. 3. Reject the agreement and propose that the County transfer jurisdiction of Durham Road with no conditions SUGGESTED ACTIO! Staff " review the proposed agreement sug,ests that the Counciland authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City (br?8) f S INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the _ day of n 19S by and between the CITY OF TIGARD (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") , F , and WASHINGTON COUNTY, a hone rule political subdivision sof the State of Oregon (hereinafter referred to as '°COUNTY"}. WITNESSETH: r < WHEREAS, CITY, is desirous of obtaining jurisdiction of a portion of _ Y S.W. Durham Road (County Road No. 429) lying betweenS,W. Mall Bled and Oregon Y Highway 99; and WHEREAS, COUNTY is considering the surrender of jurisdiction of said i ' road, either in whole or par', based upon the execution "of this agreement by CITY; ` WHEREAS, CouNTY'has adopted policies to guise the surrender of ' jurisdiction process in the interim period prior to updating COUNTY'S s Transportation Plan, and WHEREAS, COUNTY in the transportation plan update°process is determining roads which provide countywide circulation of which the maintenance, p ( Improvement or expansion should he funded from cosnt� vido reveeaue sources; and x PACE I � j 3 A s ER S, the COUNTY transportation plan update will be coordinated with adopted CIT`6 transportation plan, thaw resolving differences and establishing �s uniform classifications and standards; € through CRS;190.0 C and in f now, THEREFORE, pursuant to t3RS 19a.Q03 S consideration of the mutual covenants contained here%n, the paries agree as follows: 1. COUNTY shall A. Diligently pursue the completion of the process of surrendering COUNTY jurisdiction for all of haat portion of S.W. Durham Road as previously described. �. Endorse the CITY'S effort to administratively annex those �( portions of S.W. `Durham Road that are presently outside the F: corporate 'limitsof CITE'. C. Diligently pursue the completion of the process to"surrender �. jurisdiction sdictinsa of the remainder of S.W. Durham Road to the CITY upon the successful annexation of the entire road right of Way when requested by the CITY. 1 PAGE 2 '. 2. If said road, in whole or in part, is surrendered by COUNTY TO � CITY, CITY agrees to the following: $ A. That the standards for construction, reconstruction or any C. improvement whatsoever on said roads shall be in accordance with those 'standards of the COUNTY endorsed by the CITY On � February 24, 1986 by a'memorandum of understanding. Said. standards are entitled "Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards.". B. That the standards for functional classification's, access , spacing and design shall be in accordance with the existing ed by the COUNTY and CITY through County standards or as amend 3 ' the County 'transportation plan Update process. n. C. Initiate administrative annexation of these segments of S.W. Gorham Road not within the corporate limits of the CITY for the purpose of requesting jurisdiction of the remainder of S.W. Durham Road lying between pacific Highway and Bail Blvd. 3. This agreement shall be its effect fortwo (2) yews from the date executed by CITY below and shall automatically be extended for S, additional two (2) year periods unless at least 90 days prior to the end of a terra, CITY delivers to COUNTY a termination notice. 4.. s4 PAGE 3 f � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF FOR VIAS14INGTON COUNTY, OREGON' Chai mai Mayor Recording Secretary City €ecorder DATEEXECUTED: DATE EXECUTED r :PPRO1 D S T9 Vii: APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Counsel Office City Attorney's Office PAGE 4' a 5 s CITY OF TIGARD, =S GON t f COUNCILAGENDA ITEM StJBiPMARY AGENDA OF.- February 24 1996 AGENDA ITEM 0: DATE SUBMITTED: February 203 1906 PREVIOUS ACTION: None SSUEAGENDA,'TITLE: Accept and Authorize Signatures on Washinatan County Road Improvement PREPARED BY: Rangy Clamed Standards. Memorandum of Understanding REQUESTED BY: Engineering Division DEPARTMENT HEAD OK CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ; POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUfIVIARY 1, Over the past 19 months, the County has worked with Cities, Utility Companies Economic Development Committees, private developers (Engineers) and other interested patties to develop uniform road design standa-do for use on County controlled roads. _.. 2: Said standards have now- been developed and generally accepted by all affected parties. County;now desires that cities within the County enter into a "Remarandum of Understanding" on the' use of these standards. 3. By acceptirq this "memorandum", cities basically agree not to object on the basis of uniforrm design standards, to the transfer of jurisdiction, to the City, of roads which meet said standards. Cities also agree to - initiate proceedings to consider adoption of said standards so as to reach a decision thereon within one year. t 4. City Engineering Staff. including Interim City Engineer Bob Wright has reviewed said standards in detail and feel they are acceptable. it should be noted that these are design standards and have no effect on the determination of "Road Classification 5. the City's current design standards are outdated and will be updated this year° schen the new City Engineer is aboard. s ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED f3CT£C1N Engineering and the Interim City Engineer recommend that Council authorize signatures accepting ,this '°PRgsatararedum cif E�ndersta,Psding" as . these design standards have no negative impact on the City's position relative to road jurisdiction or uniform road improvement design standards. (3505A) Memorandum of Understanding This Agreement is entered into this day of 1986, by and between Washington County, a home rule political subdivision of the state of Oregon and an incorporated City. Whereas-. 1. It is necessary to establish and implement modern engineering design standards for road improvements to protect the public and meet transportation needs for the year 2flb�; 2. Uniform design standards for roads in both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the County will meet those goals in the most efficient and effective mariner ; 3. County, through the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee, has developed acceptable standards in conjunction with City, private developers, the Tualatin Valley Economic Development Commission, utilities, and other interested parties; 4. said standards are set forth in the Document n. entitled "Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards" , final draft dated January 29, 1986, and by this reference incorporated herein as Exhibit aA" ; Now, therefore, :the respective parties agree that: 1. City has reviewed said standards, endorses them and recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt them; memorandum of Understanding '- Mage 2 � J will initiate proceedings to 2. - Count_ .promptly � consider adoption of said standards by the Board of County Commissioners and will furnish the City with a set of the adopted standards, 3. City ;will not object on the basis of uniform design standards, to the transfer of jurisdiction, to the city, of roads which meet said standards specified in Exhibit 'A"; •` h. City promptly will initiate proceedings to � consider adaption of said standards so as to reach a 'decision : thereon within one year of the date County adopts said standards. City expresses its current intent to act favorably on adoption. This Agredment contains the full and complete agreement d of the parties and may be modified only upon the mutual ; written consent of the parties. ' S•Fashington County City Board of Commissioners 0209d/1-2 >,t a: Imo,-p•-�- �,i��;, i•'��Ae • ?4 4A • �s `Yx ro � r } L r g WF mom-m- Cr's'z-„�".: ';"�-;+y� �a• � ��'�”;-i} '� '��1-:�M„'.; �Y,. - � .. �,'`: �'�f±��s��f<�* �. �+sr�ry -r�� "��• �'�; '� t=v.$�ix��•" -��;�'+7�� 3�^�°+'"�',.' %i�� „{'�;",�[a'r?t ��''�-� k P.��. 1 1340 &W. Bertha Blvd. �i '� �a �� Inc® Portland.oMg2_n 97219 ® ® .�iC?:9/28� 4293 Eonaur ng inne'sineers t FR File. 940.10-11 f October 91 p i985 Mr. Randy Ciarrs Ergx.neering Services Hanager City of Tigard 1-2755 S.W. Ash Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Randy: ecigicatioxls fc r Roads nd 1 bane reviewed the proposed "Standard Eng neeri.nq Design he 'ifica,tions for Roads` as prepared Construction �pecby useful,thc� Tgashington County engineering , staff and find i� to be a u` 1 est that the City of 'Sicard adapt and endorse the document. � $�tgs3 �� armed to ,use 0-F tTlis document in its present form. and be prepared recommend revisions after it has been used for a year or two. Sincerely, Robert A. W Interim City Engineer VI:j g 410.91 �j�.f OEM V . wt{• CITY OF TIS DA �REGON COUNCIL ALEMA ITE SUMARY WENDA OF:, June 23, 1986 �� AGENDA ITEM P 8 DATE SMIT'TED: June 3, 1986 MM'J MUS;ACTION: IS UE/AGEMA TITLE'. Ordinance Amending City Attorney and m� Chapter :'5 and` 7 of Civi_1 "Infractions' PREPARED' BY: = William A. Monahan Ordinance REQUESTED gy; r DEPARTMENT READ OKi�./d'f �-__ .. CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should the City Code Enforcement officers have authority to reduce the penalties imposed upon violators of City'ordinances? ----------- ------- ------ INFORMTION S�Y The recent Civil Infractions Ordinance adopted by theCiLy _Couuc: i iii Figrii contains a provision giving the Cedes Enforcement Officer discretion to lower penalties. Upon consultation with the City Attorney's office, we determined that sole discretion for fee reduction should rest with the Hearings Officer. ,A The proposed ordinance revision accomplishes this and requires that security fees be posted when a denial of violation is filed. OIR'------'----'T..@---St----Re-14DffiK----.'0'.9818----------------- -----------9----S[l8----------uMmaw i ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the proposed revision to the Civil infraction ordinance. 2. .Amend the proposed ordinance revision and adopt the amended ordinance, 3. Take no action. SUGGESTED ACTION t Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance revision proposed. �F =,no - _ CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEi SIMHARY AGENDA €F: June 23, 1986 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUMITTED: June 12, 1986FMVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing on I.ID ISS'(. AGE A 'TITLE: 74th :& Cherry Formation (4/28/86). Sewer IID I' .ALRED BY: City Engineer REQUESTED BY: DEPRT. INT HEAD OK: -a��'� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ------------------------------� POLICY ISSUE Shall the public hearing be reopened to consider formation of an I.ID with reduced area? 3 WC1®:+B1fR.l\----�tii-i9�tlSiG09f®----ISYiffi�aiR-------W-Rffiffi........Ql.N4�9�6�fA S9QR9®�®®61 Qi Rl9 ION SUM4ARY INFORMAT ... On April 28, 1986, the Council held a public hearing on formation sof an LID - -11 the vicinity of 74th and Cherry. Many objections were heard. ,however, there was an Indication of support from some owners of property on Cherry Street. The Council directed the engineer to consider a reduced I.ID to serve only Cherry Street. The estimated cost of the reduced LID is approximately $40,000 to serve six lots. The property owners have been polled informally to determine interest in the reduced LID. The attached letter showing estimated project costs has been sent to each of the six property owners. The results of the informal poll will be available at the June 23 Council meeting. If Council wishes to reopen the LID formation hearing, we will need to reschedule the formal hearing and to formally notify each property owner.. The hearing could be held at the next Regular meeting on July 14, 1986. If this is the Council desire it would be appropriate to set the date,by motion and to direct the staff to notify'property owners. - - ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. By motion, set the date for a formal hearing on a reduced LID and direct that notices of the hearing be mailed to property owners. 2. Allow the question of LID formation to remain tabled. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommendation will depend on results of the informal poll of property owners and will be presented at the June 23 meeting. G OR -M- 1 une 13, 1985 OREGON 25 Fears of S&ndco 1.26 -"x63'86 Dear Property owner: on April 26, 1966, the City Council held , a Public hearing regarding the formation of a local`_Improirement District (:_Tb) for construction of sanitary se�u lines in the vicinity of Cherry Strcet and 74th Avenue. At that reducin the sire of the LID to serve g meeting, we were directed to consider only the properties on Cherry Street. the reduced LTb would serve only six lots Th project: engineer estimates that the sewer to serine only Cherry Street ; properties would, cost approximately $40,000: If the costs were assessed on the 9�asis of let area, as previously recommended, the resulting• estimated assessments are as shown on the attached sheet. The costs are rather high: x' t r., t in the , smaI1er LID, we :wilt r If- 'trio" property owners 1.UIcsa,".. ren }, �. �� the that the Ccunci.l set a date for continuing the formal hearing on tIb formation. If that happens, you will receive' a notice of the formal hearing. In order for us to determine whether property owners are interested, release complete the enclosed informal poll and return it to me by :lune 23, 1986. Sincerely,, Randall R. Wooley, P.E. CityEngineer Enc 1. 125 W.9 Halli c� P,t?: x 23397,11grard,Orman 97223 (503)639-417 June, 1986 INFORMAL POLI. 74th.& CHERRY LID ' ', OREGON 25 Yrs of S61rv1ce 195'-i9S6i Regarding the fcrmation Of a L1D' for sanitary sewer servic to ;:ix lots on Cherry Street rear 74th Avenue, we are: �j 1nterested ]Not Interested: +,Opptsed3 0 Undecided Name ' Tax Lbt No. Pleasreturn this form by June 23, 1986', tO� City Eti ginee'r City of Tigard ".13125 S.14. Hall Blvd. P.O. B(..•x 23397 Tigard OR 97223 f �y 4171 13V Hall fid,RQ,Box 23397,'1gard,Oregon 97223 (603)639- E - r o ,t :. g 3 3501 500 2€3 Lu 3101 320 L 3332 1 5300 400 cm g g 8 g g PROPOSED SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARY THE CITE' JP TIGARt3 74th AND CHERRY SEWER L.I.D. � (REDUCED AREA) l JUNE, 1986 ,I IN v is SCALE: 1 M 20,0° 1 t^u jil I, fi lure, 1986 s. ESTIMATED ASSE'SSMENTS'FOR A CHERRY STREET SEWER L:I.D. TAX LOT OWNER ASSESSMENT AREA ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 2S1 1DC 400 Maksym 19,800 S 7,847 500 Gage 13,800 . 5`,469 3101 Worzr.iak 15,080 5,97( 3200 Gordon 15,800 6,262 3300 Ems 21,200 8,402 3302 Otto 15,250 6,044 100,`930 sq. ft. $ 40,000 r f,� a CI"[Y OF TIGARD OREGON COU = €D li�6 R AGENDA OF: June 23., 1986 AGENDA ITEM H: _ t DATE SUBMITTED': June 12, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:: _ CIP/LID Budget Report PREPARED BY: City Eng ineer oavv DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � � ; CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Approval of a 'Capital Improvement Program budget for the 1986--87 Fiscal Year. INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are tables showing the budget status of current CIP/LID projects and the proposed project budgets for FY 1986-87. Also attached is an explanation of.proposed budget revisions, The FY 1985-86 CIP budget approved last December was based on a;ory, rough project <cost estimates. Since tigers preliminary engineering work has been completed and the cost estimates have been refined. The estimates on some projects are significantly higher than the earlier rough estimates. _- It has been necessary to add some CIP project work this spring which had not been anticipated in; December. This: added'' work is reflected in the attached tables. The City has ,previously agreed to contribute SDG funds to pay certain costs .in several LID projects. These 'LID projects are expected to be completed during FY 1986-87 and the required SDC contributions are included in the attached tables. The combination of increased project costs, new obligations, and LID commitments leaves our CIP budget very tight. The proposed budget for street CIP provides for no new projects and uses delayed scheduling on some projects to assure that adequate funds are available. The sanitary sewer CIP is in better, condition with three new projects proposed. The storm drainage CIP proposes one new project from last ; December's list of unfunded projects. g: Parks CIP has sufficient funds for current obligations but no new projects, ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. {approve proposed CIP budget as submitted. 2. Approve a revised CIP budget. 3. Direct staff to prepare a-revised CIP budget. SUGGESTED ACTION 1. Approve proposed' CIP budget as submitted. 9 RW:brlL PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 3 FY `1986- 7 Exulanation of 'Attached Tcables The attached tables include all the projects which are shown on ,the current'' CIP map. Other CIP obligations of the City are also shown. Where Funding is available, proposed new projects for 1986-87 are also shown. Column 1 shows the amount budgeted for each project as of February, 1986. Column 2 'shows the current estimate of the total cost to the City for each project. For ;projects with outside funding sources (grants, etc.`), only the City's share of project costs is shown. Column 3 is an estimate of actual expenditures through June 30, 1986. These figures were used in projecting CIP carryovers to FY 1986-87. The carryovers are included in the projected revenues for the new budget. Column 4 is the difference between Column 2 and Column 3. It is the estimated amount needed to complete the project.' Column 5 is the proposed budget for each project for FY 1986-87. In some cases the proposed budget is less than the amount needed to complete the project. 4.._- Project Cost Overruns The cost estimates used for budgeting last December were; very rough estimates. More detailed estimates are now available for most projects. Preliminary engineering has identified special costs associated with right-of-way acquisition, soils problems, and drainage. As a result, cost estimates are now higher for some projects. Unnumbered Projects The City has been obligated to pay certain CIP costs which were not shown on the FY 1985•-85 budget. The City is sharing in the cost of several street LID projects to pay for certain improvements which are not usually charged to the property owners. At the suggestion of the State, the City funded a traffic study for the Tigard Triangle area. In the Parks CIP budget three previous City obligations have been identified and added to the project list. Pro op sed CIP Rudcipt --Streets Project overruns combined with LID costs that will come due this next year _ have caused the total Street CIP needs (Column 4) to exceed the expected revenues; Therefore, the proposed budget requires rescheduling of several Projects. (( Project ST-5 (Commercial Street Connection) has been stopped by our inability L,,. to acquire the needed right.-of-way. In addition, we have identified some L� i traffic, pavement, and drainage problems on existing streets which should i probably be resolved before we construct the connection. Therefore, I am proposing that this project be postponed. Project ST-6 (Tiedeman Avenue Realignment) will require more design time than the other projects due to the `need to address special' right—of—way problems,. sensitive lana per issues, and Carps of Engineers permits for work in the wetlands. Construction on this project should be done in the `summer when creek flows are low and when work will not interfere with access to the junior creeschool. Therefore, T propose to budget for design and right-of--way highacquisition this year and to plan For construction to occur in the summer of 1907 (FY 1987-88). Project ST-7 (Worth° Dakota Realignment) has a proposed budget less than the estimated cost: The'difPerence'is the contingency amount included in the cast estissates propose to proceed with design and right—of—way acquisition For right-of—way costs areknown, the project. 8efare advertising for bids, after : we will need to again closely evaluate the cost estimate and budget, At that ted and their final costs still be time some other projects should be 'comple known; any contingency amounts -left in completed' projects can then be used for the North Dakota project. Project ST-18 ` (Paci:fic ;-iighwaylCanterbury Lane) is a State Highway project with some local participation possibly required. The State plan now forecasts ' 1990 construction for the project. Therefore, no City funding is proposed for 1986-87.< All other current Street CIP projects are proposed to be fully funded. Prop ±d CIP Budget — Sanitary Sewer Three new sanitary sewer projects are proposed. Project SS-9 is a major repair project on S!j 89th Place near Railing Street. Project SS-10 involves replacement of a sewer crossing under the railroad tracks at a location east of the Civic Center. The existing sewer crossing has an improper grade and is a major maintenance problem. The size of the sewer may also need to be increased as it serves a developing area of the Tigard Triangle, Project SS--11 will provide for increasing sewer capacity in problem areas, The priority locations will be identified in the sewer master plan study. Proposed CIP` Bsadge Story prainacte One new project is identified. The project was proposed last December for budgeting in FY 1986-87: The new project, sD--3, will provide a storm sewer in S ! 104th Avenue from Murdock to:Sattler to replace an existing ditch that threatens to undermine the street pavement. i Proposed CCP Budget — Parks ` No new projects are proposed. The available funds are needed to Complete current projects and to pay the Nall Boulevard LID assessment for Fanno Creek Park.' RW,.br l3 E. r `x V. O O q O 1 O O 0 1 1 q 1 O 0 O O O O i 1 O O Cil CO H0 0 O O 0 ,rr Ln O O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O p a l� 0 ID 0 O O O O 1 O M O I -1 O i d 0 O u l 0., q Q e N m W ti O Cl) N 0 Ln ul O 10 O LO v Cr.>4 W N4 CO N ri t' M M N tl' 'r N p N a v' :e7-.O (l .n O Q O o 0 o O o I •d• 1 O 1 O O 0 O 1 1 LC WLO O q O OOO6, 1O C> O 0 F EZ Cl,C1, O O 0 0 O ,O 0 O 1 i O I O :0 O O O O 1 I O N a1 W r- Ln OD O N O L/1 :U1 In N ri 00 N o ,I1 Ln M M N "a, :.�a v :Nm V). a ri co 0 o O O 1 0 O O O 0 1 O O 1 I i 1 I I --.o O O O O 0 :O O O 0 O O q O O (D :d O 0 p Ln U) N O O O O 1 O O N O I O 0 u1 M H a? 0 4jN Cb M P O r M to aD U'1 o a+ N O o o o O o o O O o O O C-- 0 0,. d O O 0 O Ln O 0 o O O -0 0 O O 0 O 0 111 0 O 0 O N O ri O 'O O C O -0 O 0 1 N tl1 H 0 o Ln V o Ln tn i Lr) a m o ui o .%D o tri H H tri Ix M N ON M 0 to lD N 1-1 M �o N W H Ucyl , � 11 q ' "�' � I 0 O' O 0. O 0 0 O O 0 O O O O O 1 1 ! i O co -©.r+7 -4 .--4 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O O C . O O O O O o -0 O O O 1 o C O C 1 I I I D O o 0 C 0' ,ri o Lr (3 ou Ln p ,Ln ,n o N N CJ r". O ri CO. M N M r-{ M N W t- ` , G .i i Ol 4j Ln � 4J 4J ) ' C 0 0 co 41 PQ Wt •Q •rOi C •ro J+ C rtt 0 C 4 m U _ r. N N O .: Q U) RS C C 1T v C Lit V).... r•1 tp rd 41 U !J W a Q) - W •.1 >✓ C ..rl N W p ' ,.. ,$ a k U :•1 C r-I C -1 C:....4J rd C 2f W O N WL C tr H G N H E, -C - '+-, C U (1)- { t p to 41 O O, a r--� _ U ,.�, R, tl �a .: ri. a P:.. U? a1 (• 0.n-', u rg H y,• N .. >, 1J al \ c H .•i mo ru V} ^s w G > •� C G W ',\� Cit Ga rkA L O > S.. y.1 4j C? H n1 a3 .k < U � x > s.+ N ;7 N U •-I rtJ C C L,, H W u ! O •r1 4) W t]) .0 •r{ C ln'U .00 .�-I H r�i 'S~ •e{ ry H .5.1 tG o :. O O O •rl U 61 rV C L U N rd - ry co 0. Ga iD 7 .-i U H 7 n � 5 (2) V) = x � � Q Q � E n W K4 is S+7 r-1 ell M =C Ln �D D- CO 61 N r1 ri � 1 C4 I 1 I S 1 I S I 1 I ,1 I i .p H H H H H i H H H E p H H E+ H E� H H H ,E H 1 V) V) V) V) V). V) V) V) V) V) ("I V) ,N (n V) EO 'tA N w V) r a O 0 I 1 I 1 d i w ' o o' o o' o 0 0 0 0 0 'o 0 O:I U O O I' 0 u^. O N O °.O en k.0 CQ p IL W '.tA N U W O 1i'7 O O 1 I I I 1 I o ' W O O. O O O O O O '0 —.Vl P. e E O X 2) 0 n o O -a W U E W- +n 1 0 M O': O 11 "I M 0 O O' O 0 O A O 0 O co C4 wV G4 O_ E � ,.0 p .: - 0 0. O 0" O O O0 0 _ O O O O I 1 I ` N rC E O to Lr r uv O N In'.0 O 114 r-I W E U vy V)- 10 r.A a co L7 J O O O O O O O O 0 - 00 9 s" D4 (b a In N- r-! .-d . � C .14 lw 4t: a ; 41 w A, ro H ro b' H d� a a m a w w ro v a Nrz •�I a ro to c x 'y o ar ro �d w a a r o v m a, xM •N w a ri U u v ua a iJ a a c> s., a C N u u rn U Pi a W .14 ' A4 04 a w rt w Si Z w la a, 4J a. w •rt a X-1 x N .G 4 E = a a � ._• rfl 0 c:' +1 < .1.d O sa_ .E U. :1 10 3 E. .. fU -tet M w _M o w w a) r a H W -W %0 O ? 1-4 r W O co r d to ` w a `n H ♦-•v N � <Y' U'f. W. ('+.: W 41 rd r-d rn cn to cn vd cn do cn w z rn d!} w cn i w o _ro 0 0 O 0 to i O u1 C4 00 0 co M >. In u' Q ¢t w.0 w <;.E. W L:. O JO O T21 H : C. i `O f.-in Cl, ry ry U) O O a b W b` Qti Ll: O O O Q`� Ems) 1I, tf) :O to 0 tf� to rt O .) 6 ? U W a r 6 E+ O Ln L ii d O a Cr 17 Qo CO E+ w-.(. O p' O.. .••. 0 0 0 1 ' J C4tp O W. fn Q L 4 t 00 N J-i y 04 ra 41 H ti G ^•� O - ...9 E+ H w w a 0 _ r4 r-f N M Cn M (n EO / I I O O O 1 O a W co W pl p1 O O G 1 O O "O 0 „•• O co A N sn n M N Ln O L.r U w0as: E- C I 1 O O O i O O O O O 0 O G I I n o o 0 ` E- O O41 N Lr) o W, ur 27 al �. +1- O O O O G O G OD to 10 0 1 O 1 1 O O S t E- E' + m Um O LL, O E x W r+ Cx, E-+ O 1 O O O O O a `v o,ut o G1 o 0 0 ,a o ry FC H O o o Ln. mo r E.cn a O is ri ntn W E. U `°,`' w rn G o 0 0 1 i O [e] •a r•1 O O O O CD LO C ro 4J .14 fo ci C r .. N o4.3a N W H 14 VH _W Ga O U H >-4 m w w w Fi zy a Iii b.. j U-:rai rNI U v o. o o� ; $ p� 0 w w cnCN M EE 4 �0 w a o, d , 'k CITY OF TIeaARff9, OREGON � SIN IL R�-DA`-ITCH SUNY AGENDA OF: ,lune 23, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0.- DATE :DAA 5U$HITT D: June 26, 1986 MVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE'/A-GENDA 'TITLE: Electrical. Inspection Discussion PREFAMD Zy.William A. Monahan ... ..,. RZQUESTRA BY: ` MEitirr na. n-AD oK. +C1Tf A IN:ISTRATOR: aweoeai��m�an-Aasies----u3- .........es.. s.. POLICY ISSUE Should Washington County perform electrical inspections in the City of Tigard? E a: asax��as�-----case-an-as-----asas ----w-wotseeaaazsxtasateaw�ns �. Washington County proposes to provide electrical inspections in all construction in the City. Prior to the county involvement, the State ;of;Oregon provided this service. Tigard may choose to provide the service or contract with x another agency. The staff supports allowing Washington County to perform the service. We have the option to revise this document at any time. " waacxrauaxras�ana¢mes----xr---acRaa----rssxsca-rave----aacnnae---------------------------------- {" ��s� r ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED V.. 1. Take no. action. 2. Reject Washington County as the provider of electrical inspectionsail in Tigard and direct the staff to either hire an electrical inspector or contract with another jurisdiction as a private contractor to provide electrical inspections. tHret sRaa at Re s2twat aa�tx�aat Nasal MA 9e9@a6R'tSMfWxX i@�a0�8A1839A62R 66waeccaznae 4R ai P.laesz+wraen aaa®.aroMea---------------- SUGGESTED awmass>mA¢a-»aaanmaawmSUGGESTED ACTION staff suggests that the Council take no action. "a f MEMORANDUM t TO: City Council June 16, 1986 S FROM: E. T. Walden, Building :Official SUBJECT.` Washington County Letter of May 19, 1986 to Mayor Cook regarding Electrical Inspections The letter indicates that Washington County will take over issuing electrical permits and do all inspections in Washington County, including cities therein. Since we do not 'wish to do this work at this time, 'due to organization, space and manpower, no action on our part is required for Washington County to do this. Since this will provide better service in Tigard, I would recommend Washington County do all electrical inspections. /br e " t r - r `s WASHINGTON OGON May 19 , 1986 f Mayor' JohnE. Cook , City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 . RE: ELECTRICAL INSPECTION Washington County has exercised its option to provide electrical F inspection with County staff effective July '1, 1986. This service was provided by the State Department of Commerce. t Washington County's objective in this is to provide a more responsive inspection service and to implement a true, single- permit process. You need to be aware of this decision as it will affect your city. T State law provides a priority system for the provision of inspection services. First priority goes to the cites, second to t the county and finally to the state. That being the case, Washington County will be prepared to provide the service to all of the cities lying wholly within Washington County. A meeting will be scheduled with your building officials to describe the details of the transfer. F The city can at any time elect to provide the service itself or contract with some other agency. To do so, it must advise the Department of Commerce in accordance with state law. Item 5 in the attached letter to Ron Clark from myself speaks to this subject and may be helpful to understand the issue. Unless the city chooses to provide the service itself or to contract with some other agency, no action is required on the part of the city council for Washington County to provide the service It appears that cities which are in parts of two counties, such as Tualatin, will need to take formal action to advise the Department of Commerce of their choice of inspection service provider. This is based on the assumption that it is in ,the best interests of the city.and the construction industry for a single provider to serve the entire jurisdiction. The logical option for providing this service would be the State Department of _ Commerce or either county in which the city is located, assuming that both counties provide the service. Department of Land Use And Transportation,Land Development Services Division 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/848.8761 Page 2 - Letter to Mayors ELECTRICAL INSPECTION May 19 , 1986 I have attached for your convenience a memo from Mr. Richard Daniels to the Board of County Commissioners discussing our reasons for imolementing the electrical inspection service with county staff. I hope this helps you understand,a little more the background. I: remain rowdy to assist you in this matter. William E. Schlecht Building official 7a r` attachment 4 1, PY fk".+k.:Y3°'�' ....14^-�%'+M[. IzwPwPsiRa' arc+*riY;Ta':-a.S�.'.�`�tr;Wt� .fi3�'.5a:!��eU."Sa^5., ',i� .r."�""r,`'�^�i4 ..w'�' .+YYdY"M`^�3t.94vC=_'�7'3tic` �'f:i..`,&L5..6�M'Y•-F1Y�^.��iH,`r} �,.-r�:''v"-�'�'��'.u:�4'��'�teT."N^F, ge��eF �i!1{yic..%�YYBIS"'�3:.��`M3'�C � F d �Ay l � 5 + w w r �w E4 d : .. � � Irq-•' � .� sr. sur.� f .;Y, rh•.- :�3 �� `r`A� `rri -.3 9 - s _:i .:Y ;".;F,r .�:;�vrt,�--�. �$2@' ra to r,. ..4,r t z mss. rs.s Sim .r ^- s- .- ` h- .,t r 'yi. -cpm 3f , •, � *.,c,. Ir. ..� s ✓ '�_i . .;:: ' r �s , �: .' ..}r<'i.k� `, f) 1..;.: a•P„F.,'"-+.ur.�-nn 'mazi:.Y$"tsfla "wwvSb"4 ',+"t}S .'S:in3L•d.*.. . +!{S-4-iYl.'"a,,.rr4.:c'.�•if.','g7`§`Y#.G;+..�[?"c�,H' ".�+5:tr"YY �. .w �..N){.,�-s -N:...2, �+:'^'T^Y`TF 3 l fie'' ' d' .t ,:. � Ar s4. .; � ` ♦3 t ', � �,-• _D "y• ��Sy��CM t yy, w_ n h R t . _., #: S* .$ :.,' F � b ... �►' ply" Fey; a#� i, ras.s R Yr ''-'*4 •� "r.:. • r3.. '!"' ��. Yy . fir '` r` axs SO, 10, us 31 P —. + �.r,+di �wggg �"��s` - sb ,rr r' "* 4 r' A APH1 9m I Richard Daniels, Director of Lam Use and Trahsportatia u OBJECTIVE: PME''CONSTRUCTION INSpEirMON SEPMMS EFFICIENCY t AND ECONOW Action req ste 4 1) Approve Electrical Inspections as one of the County—provided ins tion services.` 2) . Authorize staff to so advise the State Department of Cc rce by Pay 1 1986. Background: Fr sent Iy ;elcctrica1 inspection is provided by tyre State i�pa�srt of W70.0.ca. Under'cont act,. shingtor County issuas electrical pennits, houses State inspectors and pvides thaw basic office support. Srl%'y, the s hortwmirrgs of this; ar�r�s�g nt arr:. , 1. 7be State's per€a3ts system is verb l or..iMensive anA not easily adata p-ted to our processes. 2. 'There is rao way of checking that electrical permits are , issueed to all projects doing electrical work. He suspect not =V re=deling projects get permits. 3. Supervision for State inspectors is frwra Salmi via ptmne, letter, and quarterly rize ings. As a results wny times Washington County mpg=rain is involved in problem solving electrical situations. 4. State lnsp 'or5s are required to do their own filings hence they have one hour less inspect per day thz c�,�rrty inspectors. S. The State has only 2.00 electrical inspectors for Washington County. They average only 1.08 inspections per permit. The code C*quires a 'mini- nr €f tiftm Irrspections for a residence. Phasing of large projects %fl1i Int mse the-n+ber of inspntlans. Two ins do par permit is a mors r 6asonable average. Kill IMM IMM, z. s a ' x t State law provides that Imal Jurisdictions can assum the responsibility of electricalinspections, just as it cue dthor_ f. areas of construction inspection. To transfer auttwrity a Jurisdic- tion must advise tim State by MY Ist and aswzw the prate; July ist. State law also requires the Stam to pay the County for inswbtio-a the County will sake after the transfer on projects permitted by the State before the.transfer. In addition, State inspectors now rking,in Washington County tould transfer to County payroll. { Budgets have been prepared and are currently in the narml budget review process for this service. The service is fed supported and requires aro',general Rand support. Land Use and 'transportation recoFiends the Board provide this service alone with the other inspection services now provided for the following reasons: 1. sons•1. It allows Washington County to provide a trace orae--stop ` peri it, process which serves our clients care eff is ient y. 2. Reduces the paperwork and client contacts needed to issue permits by 10%. p 3. Prepares for conbination inspection rich when alloted by state law will reduce overhead for residential construction inspection by 15% to 20%. 4. ,allows better coordination of permits and inspection through use of €a compatible .inspections-and permit issuing.process, ja i Pao 2 -' Board of Coissionerrs ELECTRICAL INSPECTIOn az-. April g, 138 AJ.� •, MON.` 4 cITY�OF TIGARQ1-OREGOi�! COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 23,___L9_86 AGENDA ITEM #: �'-s'. 3 DATE SUBMITTED: :Lqr 20S 1386 PREVI©US ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Director's ®ecidzan - V 12-86 Walter West Corp. PREPARED BY: Community Develop ��rse REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD 09: In'l CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE ` INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the Director's Decision for: V 12-86 - Walter West Corp. (Aszman) approval for a request to allow a 1st foot Beide driveway where 29` feet is required on property zaned R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre), located at 12085 SW :135th; ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the Decision as written. 2. Remove from Consent Agenda and set for a date certain. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the Decision as written. br35 z k A CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION VARIANCE V 12-86 i APPLICATION: Request by �da,ter Llest Corp. (Aszman) to allow a 10 foot voids driveway where 24 feet is requiredSid 135th (l+iCTC9y2S1 4R, T. zoned -L5 (Residential, 25 unats/arre) and located at;.12055. DECD Slo%: notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain " conditions. The findings, and conclusions on which the Director based his Tigard decision are as noted below. . k A. FINDING OF FACT 1, Background s. val was granted to divide a On September, 1985, partition appro - 5.41 acre parcel into two lots of 11,250 square feet and 4.75 i acres (MLP 12-85) The applicant subsequently satisfied the conditions of.appraval and the partition has been recorded. The parcel is intended to be developed with a 100 resulting 4.75 acre p approval (Si3Ft 2-86). unit apartment complex which has received City app 2. Vicinity Information ` -25 property to the north, south, and west is zoned Rthe The p ' p north (Residential, 25 developed) with and single familyheresdences.�n The process of being p the above described 11,250 square foot lot that was created by partition, contains a residence. The land to the south is # presently vacant and zoned C-M (Commercial Neighborhood). G t 3, Site Information and Proposal Description is currently Undeveloped. The applicant intends to The property , construct an apartment complex consisting 'of 100, one and two tile rsed bedroom units.eTwelve r•imeter of the project wilwill be l lardscapedhas�well parcel. The p as a central common :area which will include a swim�aaing pool. �. Access will be provided by one common driveway. Of adjusting the site plan to meet the City' s 1 During the process 3 conditions of approval, including' a realignment of 135th Avenue, a � location serving one of nt change in the driveway ro osing ah variancetoli buildings was necessary. The applicant is pp allow a 10 foot wide driveway serving a four-unit building where ' the Community Development Code requires a width of 24 feet. NOTICE OF DECISION - V 12-86 _ PAGE 1 e MEv 4 , 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposal,' but recommends review by the fire district. The Building Inspection Division that problems for two—way passage ' of -vehicles could occur :due to the length and width of the driveway. Washington County Fire District No. 1 notes that the Fire Code requires a, 20 foot wide driveway access. No other comments have been received. D. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The following criteria in the Community . Development Code apply to variance requests: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental too the purposes of this Code, be in, conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Flan, ; to any other' applicable policies and standards;: and to other properties in the same zoning district or ; vicinity; 2. There arespecial circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the : lot size or shape, topography ,or other circumstances ' over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and Citystandards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of land; 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic,__ drainage, dramatic land farms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code; and 5. The hardship is not: self—imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The Planning staff concludes that the variance is consistent with the approval criteria noted in.Section 15.134.050 of the Code based upon the following findings: F 1 The purpose of the minimum driveway width standard is primarily to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles. The fire district has indicated that a proposed width reduction to 20 feet will be acceptable. NOTICE OF DECISION - V 12-86 PAGE a es to large 2. The 24 foot width requirement for driveways also appls multi-family and commercial developments which generatemany;times a the _vehicular' traffic that will result from the four-unit apartment building. , A small reduction in width that still allows' for proper emergency access is appropriate. 3. The proposed multiple family residences are permitted and except for the -four foot reduction in driveway width, all other, City standards will be met. 4. The' variance will not have significant impact upon 'physical or natural systems. To a sma11 extent the proposal will reduce the amount ofwaterrunoff. a. The: proposed variance is minimal and will relieve the applicant of the expense of providing additional pavement that is unnecessary; in `this :instance. C. DECISION x The Planning Director approves V 12-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. The driveway width shall be a minimum of 20 feet. 2. The site plan shall be adjusted as necessary to accommodate the 20 fast width. Any adjustment of building locations must be approved by the Planning Director. 3. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final ss decision date noted below. x D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at Citi Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant a owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization m XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL. BE FINAL ON ,Tune 30 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL- IS PPEALIS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION - ,V 12--86 - PAGE 3 3 Appeal• Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 15.32.290(A) and Section 15.32.370 of the Community Code which provides that a written appeal merit oe Development filed with the CITY RECO[.DER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. June 30, 1986 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City' Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Sox 23397, Tigard, Oregon97223, 639-4171. f PREPARED S Keith S. 'Liden, Senior P;inner DATE .F mill +r�'�. -Monahan, €3irector of Community Development DATE APPROVED (KSL:bs97) 'I t i E i N0j'ICE O MCIS1011 — V 12-86 - PAGE 4 / i f , i k. 14ONTHLY REPORT April 1986 CITYOFTIAIW OREGON 25 Years of erwlc TO: Library Board 1961-1986 City:Council FROM: City Librarian WCCLS: The 'automation 'project is still on schedule. It should be noted that the cable installation for the Tigard Library coincided with other electrical ' installation and went very smoothly. Librarian Irene Ertell served as budget committee chairman. ' Move to Civic Center: In preparation for the move to the Civic Center the library closed to public service on April 26 at 5000 p.m. Personnel: Thirty volunteers gave a total of;269.5 hours; daily 'average 10.4 ` hours. Staff time, 4.75 hours. Three community service assignees worked 'a total of 47.75 hours. Staff time, ' 1.16 hours. Library Board gave 10 hours. 'Youth Services: Display — Giant "Going Away Card" for children to sign to say goodbye toto� oid library. ":fids Talk Books" was county—wide program sponsored by Storer Cable. Children gave 'oral book review of their favorite library book. €, L3CCLS 'and each library received copy of finished tapes which aired on Cable Channel 12. Fifty dollars was donated to library by local scout troop for .: purchase of reference book of interest to 4th :grade boys. Audubon Society' "Wild Cats" was selected. � Work Indicators: April 1986 Aril 1985 Adult Materials 6510 6133 Juvenile Materials 3334 2649 TOTAL 9844 8782 Days of Service 20 21 Average Daily Circulation 493.4 418 Inere&se/Decrease Circulation 18% -10% Reference/Readers' Advisory 319 325 . Books in Use in Library 76$ Storytime Attendance (sessions) 90 (12) 25 (2) Special Children's Programs 27 (3) 164 (8) (sessions) Materials Added/Withdrawn 708/145 697/280 Borrowers: view/Renewal 171/116=287 175/95=270 "3125 SW Mall Blvd.,RO.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 t -semi W- Em- Aw -7- 2i MONTHLY REPORT May 1986 REDO 25 Yeors of Service TO: LIBRARY BOARD CITY COUNCIL 1961-1986 FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN WCCLS: The automation equipment arrived at the center in Aloha. Staff training will be scheduled for June and it is anticipated that we will begin conversion in July. Librarian attended a meeting on structure and governance held by city managers and librarians. Each city, except Tigard, presented a statement on local service goals and criteria for a cooperative county-vide 'service model. City Administrator i has instructed Librarian to take inactive roll at 'present in light of work load connected with the move and setting up new work programs. Dedication of Civic Center All members of the staff were scheduled for.work on May 17, Civic Center Dedication Day, so as to be present for the ceremony and take care of library visitors. Shifts of trained volunteers were also scheduled to give tours and answer general questions. Literacy Group: A group from the Tigard literacy program held their first meeting in the new library on May 31. Move to Civic Center: On Saturday, May 3, the first books were moved into the new library. The move was completed on Tuesday, May 6. The library reopened for public service on May 17. Personnel: Twenty-four volunteers gave 186.25 hours; 7:2 hours daily average. Community service assignees worked 36.75 hours; ,1<4 daily average. Staff time, 45 min. Library Board gave 19.75 hours. Youth Services: The library was closed until May 17, but on Friday, May 16, Toddler Time was conducted as scheduled. The juvenile circulation for May (open 11 days) was 2322. Last May (open 22 days) circulation was 2816. There were 6 pre-school ' storytimes; 3 toddler times; 3 scout groups; visit by 60 children from C.F. Tigard Elementary School.. Work Indicators: May 1986 May 1985 Adult Indicators 3320 6242 Juvenile Materials 2441 2924 TOTAL 5761 9166 Days of Service 11 23 Average Daily Circ' 523.7 398 Increase/Decrease Circ 327* --7% Reference/Readers' Advisory 205 301 Books in Use in Library 444 5torytime (sessions) 44 (6) 37 (3) Special Children's Programs 93 (5) 61 Materials Added/Withdrawn 532/0 890/65 Borrowers: New/Renewal 176/114-290 114/120=234 * Reflects daily average increase. Library was closed until May 17, 13125 W1 Hnil Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (533)639-4171 s - e ( MEMORANDUM CITY OF T'IGARD, OREGON r TO: s {payor and City ,Council June li 1986 FR{ ;; Jerri L. Widner, Finance Director SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY - MAY AND PART OF JUNE The statistics for May have not been completed yet, so in the June report you will be receiving May, numbers. The staffing for Finance will. be short by two people until July---.due to vacations. This means additional work for some of the department. We are currently gearing up for the annual audit, the completion of the budget' y and filing of the proper forms to the tax assessor and preparing for the r implementation of the hardware and shortly thereafter the software of the new computer system: I predict our department will be busy for next six months working on the computer implementation. The Municipal Court clerks finally got to move into their area on June ©,; 1986. We're hoping;this move will relieve Community Development from some of the pressure of meeting the public and that soon we will be fully operational. JLW:jw (1347F) i CITY OF T'IGARD,`OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUnMARY AGENDA OF: June 23 3986 AGENDA ITEM M: t DATE'SUBMITTED': June 5. 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Repart Anil 1986 Community €3eveloRment PREPARED 8Y: W. A. Monahan. y� REQUESTED BY: DEPAi�TfiiENT MEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY' ttartd please fS.nd the Manth�ly Report `for April, 3986 prepared by the Department of Community [Development. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION' Accept and place on file. (0590P) ;i WON MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t. TO: Members of the City Council June 5, 1986 FROM- William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report April, 1985 During April, the Department of Community Development was involved ;in each of the following areas: — Coordinating the move of the division to the Civic Center. Processing 20 single family" residential building; permits and 5 commercial permits. Through April 30, 146 single family permits had been processed. Inspections for these properties wer underway. Capital' improvement project coordination was transferred to Randy Wooley. — Adoption of the civil infractions ordinance to streamline codes enforcement - Evaluation of the Business Tax system to enhance revenue collection. — Regular Operations work programs with an emphasis on park preparation and street work. The Department,was fully staffed in April with the addition of two part time park workers. Efforts to prepare the parks for summer use were underway. Improvements to Cook Park were delayed somewhat to allow staff to concentrate on Civic Center landscaping. Normal Planning and Engineering tr�ens were experienced while Building permit issuance slowed 'down from the high rate of the preceeding three months Building`activity has not slowed as the number of plans submitted for checking remained steady. Over the course of 1986, well over three hundred single family permits should be issued. The three Home Shows in Tigard were scheduled for ,operation in April and May. These should continue to fuel the demand for permits in Tigard Committees staffed by the Department were active during April. All are involved in activities consistent with work,programs. = (WAM:brf0950P) BUILDING SECTION — APRIL COMPARISON Following is a comparison of building activity for April of 1985 and 1986: A ri 1_.,, 1985 A ri l, 1986' Single Family; Permits 19 20 Multi—Family Permits Total Units 2 0 Commercial Permits 2 1 Building Permit Fees $ 12,171.50 ;" 20,050.50 Plan Check Feer 6,591.15 11,969.53 Plumbing Permits 11,966.80 3,487.50 Mechanical Permits 731.00 834.50 Valuation 2,513,574.00 5,885,660.00 Tan. — April 1585 Jan.. April 1986; Single Family Permits 83 146 Multi—Family Permits , (Total Units) 332 6 Commercial Permits 5 4 Building Permit Fees 68,557.50 $ 66,735.92 Plan Check Fees 22,8$6.60 36,832.58 Plumbing Permits 34,994.78 22,460.40 Mechnical Permits 3,161.50 3,115:00 Valuation 17,969,724.00 15,597,195.00 (br/095 P) ,i rt , 3 .. f. O k 0 0 0 �-- r'I � O N C � C� w O O C O O O O O in O O Lc? In Ch Ol V In -co a, N c O w w in O O O :O O O upi rn uai. •+ c •� P o o .t, o � o N n N P O N CN+ 01 w Q i'nyy N N w N Qf N h C 0. N 0. W O+ » a.. e)• X11 �'. J G M O h 17 ^i M Cf h M 0 10 tV Q+ 41 o 0. O a O off O O Cf �+ sn O u O • Q, ..a N ti N N 10 tP/ .r LO O N C. N M b m N O .� co ti 0 & S S o S S o m -. 10 10 010 C h P O O O �. O uD P w N � S h W N p m a) C m O ® C m G pt T b lc m N P O h N N T � M N Cal W OP1 � P a M C) In O N m M I ti 0 5r 51 L• CP � 41 C� co J2 L L w ma fZ LL £ tS v° e y� W O O N M N m W N N N N O O O O Ct C a e W .-v H 40� t J 2.O ' - v co O u07 u0-, 0 0 � 00 un m O ti .e N rn a an M b ,P (71 to 4 O O gg .A mI ...O K! .ni P @ N n " R 0. Ct h N +'<I N O N O E N O Q n C+ M N C m a W h b to N M O N ll O h I C� In W [T N N M1 a CLI N N 0 co n fW.. n C. N ,ni N 0. 9 Y 0y in 0 •+ O O ti O n0 m m W ul W W N N W 1� O :ut an1.1 n. a+ - W n m N `W In C+ `O cT n �n W m j0 N M1 m. m. Wul G+ a h' M1 a W �C �O K'1 Iff a 01 C6 NO -W O a• m W m O G C7 O O G O O O O O 0 O -O O O O O -0 O O N co O ." m o+ �'.N 10 w O NO.-s w min m m 40 �C in co O m �O M N10 N Ow C m O u) !f d t1. CITY OF TIGARD OREGON v COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SU'c'"4RY f ,�2 AGENDA OF:, June 23 AGENDA ITEM N: h`�8�_ _ DATE SUBMITTED: June' 17, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: 5 ISSUEAGENDA TITLE: Director's Decision M 2-86 7 Chester Currx and PREPARED BY: ommuni v Develoom_ert _Steven and Lori Jensen _ REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT, HEAD OR: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the Director's Decision for M 2-86 — approval of an application by Chester Curry, and Steven and Lori Jensen to adjust :two parcels of 0.59 and 0.60 'acres'into two parcels of 0.84 and 0.35 acres each on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4`.5 units per acre) and located at 9975 and 9995 SW Garrett Street. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve as written. 2.` Call up for review at a date set by Council. ' SUGGESTED ACTION _ Y Approve -as written-. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF 'DECISION M 286 APPLICATION: Request by Chester Curry and Steven and Lori 3e�-user, to adjust two parcels of 0.59 and 0.60 acres into two parcels of 0.94 and 0 35, acres each on property zoned 'R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5units per acre) ;and located at 9975;and -9995 SSW. Garrett Street (WCTM 2S12Cd, tax lots 3700 and 3800). DECISION: Noticeis hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based .his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1, Background No, previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department with respect to the subject properties. 2. Vicinity Information Properties to the north, east and southeast are all zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre). Properties to the 'southwest and northwest are zoned R-12 (Medium-Nigh Density Residential,' 12 units; per acre). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 2,200 square foot residence on tax lot 3700 and an approximately 1,500 square foot residence on tax lot 3800. The applicant' proposes to combine the rear portion of tax lot 3800 with 3700, in effect moving the upper boundary between the tax lots 90 degrees to the south so that tax lot 3800 is reduced from 0.60 acres to 0.35 acres and lot 3700 is increased from 0.59 acres to 0.84 acres`. The property being enlarged is located at 9995 Garrett Street (lot 3700) and is presently on septic while 9975 Garrett Street (lot 3800) is on city sewer. Since the lot on septic will not be reduced in size, the system should not be affected. Hooking up to the public sewer system is presently encouraged and could be required in the future. Because no additional development is proposed and the parcel's ability to } accommodate the existing system will not be inhibited, a public sewer connection will not be required as a condition of this approval for lot 3700 at 9995 Garrett Street. 4, Agency and !`SPO Comments } The Engineering Division has the following comments: a) The City should require a five foot dedication of right--of-way (i.e., 25 feet from the centerline) along Garrett Street. NOTICE OF DECISION — M 286 PAGE: 1 b; A sanitary ; sewer main line exists in the roadway. If the dwelling units on the subject parcels are not connected thereto, then they should be required to`do so. cl Standard survey and legal description requirements are also necessary. The lot fine adjustment shall be recordedat Washington County. The Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. No other comments were received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.162 of the Tigard Community ' Development Code. The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan; the lot lime adjustment complies with all statuatory ;and ordinance requirements and regulations; adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal'; and 'both lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of the Code (7500 square foot minimum lot size and 50 foot minimum lot width). C. DECISION The Planning Director approves ' M 2-86 subject to the following condi-tions ,t r 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 2. The;final legal descriptions and survey maps shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to recording. The necessary documents shall be recorded by the City unless other arrangements are approved by the Director. 3. A five foot wide strip of land along Garrett Street (25 feet from the centerline) shall be dedicated to the City. The necessary forms is attached. 4. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final_ decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall' and mailed to: _ XX _ The applicant & owners y XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX _ Affected governmental agencies NOTICE OF' DECISION M 2-1,86 - PAGE 2 i' Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL:3E FINAL ON June 27, 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.29Q(A) and Section 13.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. ' The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.t9, June 27 L 1986 4. _Questions: if you have any questions, please call the City of . Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO 86k 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223; 639-4171. ; P3�EPf�RE eborah A. S art Ass ant Planner DATE �. Wi1iann 'A. Morahan, Director of Community` Development DATE APRRQVED 1, (DAS:sb5) NOTICE OF DECISION - M ,2-136 - PAGE 3 � CITY_OF TIGARD.OREGON , COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM`SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 23 196 AGENDA ITEM H: DATE SUBMITTED: June 10s 'a9B�i PREVIOUS ACTION: Council direction ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE at prisr coancil meetinca _ DECLARING DELINQtlENT QANCROFT PREPARED BY: J. Widner INSTALLMENTS RES NO, 86-1n' REQUESTED BY. Cit C uncil DEPARTMENT HEAD 09: L•, , ��R! CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY- ISSUE To manage installment payment agreements—keeping them current and acting on those that 'become delinquent. INFORMATION SUMMARY T'he City Council at a previous meeting determined that twice each fiscal year, it would review delinquent installment agreement accounts and act on those that were delinquent, The months of June and December were chosen for action. Attached is the Jure resolution of delinquencies for your action. After passage of this resolution, I will notify affected property owners and allow them 30 days in which to bring the ;account current, before the City will begin foreclosure proceedings. I would suspect that what happened last year, will. happen;this year—property owners will want to make alternative payment arrangements I still have the necessary forms for doing this and I will come back to you for your approval on any of these that are necessary. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Do nothing, but act in December. 2. Adopt the attached resolution declaring the accounts delinquent. SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend passage of the attached resolution. COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 23, 1986 PAGE 4 CITY'OF TIGARD OREGON � �C(?UNCIL AGENC?A ITEM SUMMARY JUN 23 AGENDA OF: -�- � AGENDA ITER DATE SUBMITTED: Sune 13 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Tiaa,rd Electric on June J 1986 . Rescalutiox� 86 �D Q11, PREPARED BY:' Deborah A. Stuart REQUESTED BY fe�nr�arE amuse 3UT 4-8t DEPARTMENT HEAD 0K: CITY ADMINISTRATOR* ` POLICY ISSUE INi ORMATIOI SUMARY ." On June 9, 1986, the Tigard City Council heard a request by Tigard Electric �,. for a 'Temporary Use Permit 'to alloys Use of � mobile hose as a temporary office ups to one year. The Council voted to deny the request. Attached is a ' resolution for Council adaption. .. �� ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution. 2. Approve with modifications. C SUGGES:LQ ACTION Adopt the attached resolution. � (br21) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA 0! June_23 1986 ' AGENDA ITEM : DATE SUBMITTED: June 16, 1986PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing was ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Christ the Kinn held on June 9 1986 _Lutheran Church (SDR 9-861 PREPARED BY: Keith Liden REQUESTED €3Y: City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On June 9, 1986, the City Council held a public hearing to consider conditions number 3 and 6 of an approval granted by the Director of Community Development for an expansion of Christ the King Lutheran Church. The Minutes are attached. The City council voted to modify the Director's decision to require ' 35 feet of right-of-way along Bull Mtn'. Road instead of 40 feet. Attached is a resolution which if adopted would approve the Director's decision with modified conditions. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Adopt the attached ordinance. Modify the attached ordinance. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance. dj/18, Council Agenda .June 23, 1906 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 23, 1986 AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL DATE SUBMITTED: Mune 4th, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE'/AGE@JDA TITLE: Chelsea Hill f#2 Subdivision Compliance Agreement & PREPARED BY: Development Services Debt Performance Bond; ;authorize Mayor & Recorder to execute in Cita''s behalf REQUESTED BY: John HaaSman DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: %<J��J �� CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY 'ISSUE- — INFORMATION SUMMARY c 1. The proposed "Chelsea Hill No.2" subdivision is located< on 'Sid O'Mara Street ,between Frewing Street and Hall Blvd. The preliminary plat ;has been approved by the City'. m �x. 2. The attachedSubdivision Compliance Agreement and Personal Surety � Performance Bond has been submitted by the developer, as is required by the 'City, to assure completion of installation of all public facilities "within the proposed subdivision. " 3. Construction plans have been issued and all required public improvement fees have been paid. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to execute the Subdivision Compliance Agreement for Chelsea Hill No. 2 in behalf of the City; and, also, accept the Personal Surety Performance Bond therefor. JH:bs83 v MIAMI WIE M. 100 p' 4, 1 'L CITY OF TIGAR€}, OREGON COUNCIL 'AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 2.3, 1986 AGENDA ITEM H: 13.9 HATE SUBMITTED: June 18 1996 PREVIOUS ACTION: Approval of the s ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Training Computer Master Plan Ra ug est - Surr•ourahs PREPARED BY: Jerri L. Widner REQUESTED BY: Jerri L. Widner'' DEPARTMENT MEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR ^ POLICY ISSUE 9 Implementation of the Computer Master Plan. INFORMATION SUMMARY Tigard City Council approved the Computer Master Plan in the last few months. As Part of; the plan, ;there was approval of a main frame computer and micro computers. One of the micro computers is to be used as a floater for department head use. In addition, the micro computer will be used by the Engineering, Planning ' and Building Departments. ' In order to use this equipment properly, employees will need to be "trained on the equipment. Burroughs is putting together a three-day training session July 22nd, 23rd, and 24th here in Portland. Normally,, their training is in Los Angeles. The cost of this training per person, depending on the number attending, will be between $450-$500 per person. City staff have identified nine employees to attend. They will he: Bob Jean, Joy Martin, Randy ;Wooley, Bill Monahan, Jerri Widner, Randy Clarno, Deborah Stuart, Laura McLellan, and someone from Building to be determined. Attached is a description of the course. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Do noth i.ng. 2. ' Have training in Los Angeles. 3. Frain here locally. SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend approval of this necessary training for the use of the B25 Micro computer. (JLW:cnl55) Attachment f' 1 4- 1 'e i4 20 Complete Operations (EP 6070 Audience # This course is for operators of the B 20.Although programmers,analysts,and data processing managers may attend,the subject natter is directed to the operator. Objectiives t Upon successful completion of this course,the student will be able to: Recognize the physical attributes of B 20 systems and clusters. a rower on and off a B 20 system and cluster. t Use floppy diskF4. ®:Use executive commands to manipulate files. ' f - o Use executive commands to control the input,processing,and output of the B 20 system or cluster- ® Respond to errors. Description This course provides the information required to perform in-depth B 20 operations. Topics i 4. a Physical Operation(power-on,floppy disks,power-off and printers) k. Using Executive Commands ` ® Interpreting Error Status Codes, f' x p. Prerequisites EL 6300—B 20 Operations Self Study Duration g: 'three days • f . no l S-12 x ffi. CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA'ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June23 1985 AGENDA ITEM 0: DATE SUBMITTED: June 19, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Engineerinq Contract For PREPARED BY: Citv En ineer S.W. Tiedeman Realignment REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT 4EAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Approval of contract for engineering services for the Tiedeman Avenue Realignment project. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed CIP budget includes funding for completion of design and right--of-tray work for Tiedeman Avenue Realignment. MacKenzie Engineering Completed the preliminary engineering report. Attached is a drawing" showing the proposed realignment'. The design will provide <for ultimate development as shown; however, we propose to construct only a 30 foot street width with sidewalk only on the west side. Until the narrow Fanno Creek bridge is replaced, construction of the full street width and east sidewalk would have little benefit. The attacked contract provides for MacKenzie Engineering to provide engineering services through the design phase, and also during construction if needed, ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached contract for engineering services. 2. Direct that the contract be modified. E 3 Stop work on the project. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the contract as submitted. lbr33 g 1 j MAC ENZIE ENGINEERING,INCORPORATED OLM- SW BANOR'*f Slliffl PO(4TI-AND.GREG()N97201 ,1503),2,24 9560 [ §' } June 113, 1986 i City of Tigard Attention: Mr. Randy Tooley City Engineer 12755 S'.W.. Ash Avenue Tigard, Oregon .97223 Dear Randy: RE: S.W. Tiedeman Street Realignment, .E-ngi:neering .Services ' r Project Number 186030.001 c Thank you for the opportunity, to continue service 'to` the City of Tigard"s Capital ; Improvements Program. The following .shall serve to document .our ;fee and time �schedul.e � for completion of bid documents and construction services for the Ti.edeman ,pro.ject. Task 1: Sensitive Lands Application Time and Materials, Not to Exceed $1,400..00 We will prepare the .joint Corps,/Division ,of State Lands .applicati,on, T:i.gard Sensitive{.ands Application, cal cul ata ons., :narr.etive and:draws qgs. :Processing of the application th.r,ough the 'various <agencies .wi:ll :be the r-esponsi'.b�iity of the city of Tigard.. Our initial field review with Corps .staff will ,1ntl,ud_e g review of any abbreviated review ,processes that ;may .be ,available for this project. Task 2 Fina�iveering Design and Construction -Documents � 4 a Time and Materials, 'Not to 'Exceed $4,.500.00 We will prepare final construction drawings and s:pecifications., acceptab'l:e for advertisement .and bidding_ The specifications ,will follow either CSI or APWA format, as :directed by the C tye � The work will be commenced upon your verbal authorization, to be closely followed by a standard City`.Services Contract. Our work will be comlete, ready for advertisement, not later than four .weeks after corps approval is granted. zf e . t t z � �� a0no i c n IF 4 r ro .m rF !' � /`5 � � ��. f tri k ��'��r!✓,`�� } �i �trr \ tl \V _. f �sp; e/ rf =FTl,tf f r r 1 ..m-U+t << ,n T Cts# ✓ .Q 9 �, If w rs, Baa / '� iE�s �� ' `e� r ' � ' .,�" ��• rt�m^Z e!i��v�\ <� as � n a. t .n '.r^ •w. :. t s V PY pi�X:` 49 \`L., aa,o�, ;y �. itou 1� p Y 31 Jiw rn rtfl G rn t T x F777 Io - ,N rmlt i .5 v s "CITY =OF':TIGARD,��'OREGM CONTRACT:FOR'PROFESSIONAL `SERVICES 2:3�3T Ai:T =TITL"E: ._ S:&�. `TIEOEP9 RAV �S�JE REFttlGE+IMENT,-..EB'JGY.NEERIIG'-'SER9fI -S 'CONTRACT f!O.,:. r :This == r Randy,Wooley i �Trojet t',NumberI186030A01 .Josie`.10, 1985 Page"2. -r...t_ a. !`......F.n i. !-inn Services. ass-.'J. Con`r Ls.ucs.a w f,i�ae.. rid Material s,'.NotAo..Exceed-$3,500;00 'e-will. provide construci ion inspection commensurate with the.progress of'the ew project. 3n add,ition, we .wi11 be available'-to visit the `.site =to-,r- that � contractor�and'Ci_ty questions, iproblems,; or suggestions. ,tie estimate that 20 site visits will-•be adequate for- this,.project. - `also subcansioltant, ;critical checks on will provide, throughour soils ' construction quality. This includes subgrade, base rock, and paving,density testing 'at..appropr•iate' intervals. tie -wi i 1 upgrade t0�e plans to`�`°as=bu i 1 t° at the comp)et i on of 'the project. 'Task=4: Construction Staking Time,=and-'MateriAls, fdbt- to'c Exceed $3,300:00 Providel.one;set sof�each of.the f611 owi ng stakes: a. Clearing Iimits Slope",stakes -c. Storm-Arai n ;stakes d, Einish.-,curb,stakes at',251 on, center While werealize thattheCity survey-crew has. provided support to our design effort, we'-=have:supplied_a fee:for this item in: the-event the City crew is unavailable. Len_Schelsky will be,our survey-subconsultant, when required. the C ty on this-project. I hope;th isadequately,addresses our projectedcosts for engineering/surveying services on' this project. <'Please do;not hesitate to.call with any questions you may.have. 'Sincerely, David:'G. .Larson, P.E. P�ojhct Engineer 2. Paysment by the City shall release the City from any further 'obli.gation for payment to Contractor for service or services performed or expenses incurred as of the 'date of --the statement of services. Payment shaI12 not be considered acceptance or approval of any work or waiver of any defect 'therein. 3. The,City certifies that sufficient funds are available 'and authorized fog expenditureto finance costs of this contract. B. A11 worts performed by, the Contractor under, this Agreement shall be .the property of:the City. 3. Contrast Identification. 7he Contractor .shall furnish to the City its employer identification number, as designated =by the eternal Revenue ' Service, or Contractor.'s Social' Security'Number, as' the :City deems applicable. 4. City's Reoresertative For purposes hereof, the City's authorized 'representative .will be the City '.Engineer, 13125`:SW Hall Blvd., P.Q. Sox 23397, 'Tigard,' Oregon 97223;1, (503)."639 4k?1 5. "Contractor's Representative. hereof,-.the:Contractor's 'authorized representative will be. David C. Marson 0690'SW Bancroft Street Portland,' OR 97201 6. City's Obligations. In:,order to: facilitate the .work of ithe .Contractor as above outlined, the City shall fur•-nish to the Contractor access to all existing inforir.�Ltion-ajhich :is do the City's possession concerning the location of sewer <and .water 'lines and 'other 'utilities . or .structures - which affect: the planning and construction of the'proposed improvements. 7. Contractor is :Independent--Contractor. R. Contractor's services shall be provided under the general supervision of City's>project director or his or her 'designee, ' but :Contractor :shall be , an independent .:.contractor for all purposes ;and 'shall be entitled to no compensation other than the compensation provided for under paragraph 2 of this Agreement. `sl COAJTRACT'IIF0R PERSONAL SERVICES _:PAGE' 2 B. In the event Contractor is to perform the services described in this Agreement without' the 'assistance of others, Contractor hereby agrees to fide a joint declaration with City to the effect that Contractor's services are those of an independent contractor, as provided under Chapter 864 Oregon laws 1979. C. Contractor,acknowledges' that for all Purposes related to this Agreement, Contractor is and shall< be deemed to be an independent contractor ani not .an employee of the City, shall not be entitled to benefits of any kind to which an employee Of the City is entitled and shall 'be solely responsible for all payssents.and taxes required by law; and furthermore I in the event that Contractor is found by>a court of :lase or an administrative agency to :be an employee of the City for any purpose, City shall be entitled to, offset compensation due to demand '; repayment of any 'a-mounts 'paid to Contractor under the teras of this Agreement, to the full extent; of :any benefits or other renumeration Contractor receives (from City or third party) as`a result of said finding and to the fullextent of any payments that City is . required to snake (to Contractor or "to a third party) as a result of.said finding. D. The undersigned C+3 tractor hereby 'represents that no employee of the City of Tigard, or,any.partnership orcorporation in Which a City employee has an interest, has or will receive any � remuneration of :any, description from the Contractor, either directly or indirectly, in connection with the letting or performance oftbis,contract,' except as specifically declared in writing. . i3. Subcontractors -- Assi nment £ delegation. A. Con's �'. iractor-shall submit a list of subcontractors for approval by the City, and_Contractor shall be fully responsible for the acts or- omissions of any 'subcontractors and of all ;persons employed by them, -and neither the :approval by City of any subcontractor nor anything contained herein shall be deemed to create .any contractual relation between the subcontractor and City. �. This Agreement, and all of the covenants and conditions hereof, '` shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and v: the Contractor respectively and their legal representatives. EN Contractor -hall :not assign ,any rights nor delegate any duties incurred by this contract, or any part hereof without the written consent of City, any any assignment or delegation in ., violation hereof shall be.void. /77 CC3WRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES —`PACE 3 f _ �+. Contractor`s `Emsslo�cees A9edxcal 'F�a�ments. �, Contractor agrees to pay p The Conromptly as due, to any person. copartnership, association or corporation furnishing medical, surgical, and hospital care or other needed care and attention E incident to sickness or injury to the for such r employees, all all sums which the Contractor agreed to pay monies and sums which the Contractor collected or deducted from employees' wages pursuant to any `law, contract or agreesssnt for `n or paying for such services. provide. g pay r 10. Early Te'rnaination. A. This Agreement y be terminated 'without cause prior to the ; expiration of the agreed upon term by mutual written` conseeat of n the parties and for the fallowing reasons authorized by ORS 279.325: 1. if work under the Contract is suspended by an order of � a public 'agency for any reason considered to be in the public interest other than by a lat+or dispute a n by reason of any third party judicial proceeding relating to the work other than suite or action filed in regard to a labor dispute; or 2. If '-he circumstances or conditions are such that it is impracticable within a reasonable time to proceed with a substantial portion of the Contract. 9. payment of Contractor shall be provided by ORS 279,330 and shall be prorated to and include the day of termination and shall be in full satisfaction of all claims by Contractoragainst City under this,Agreement. C. Termination under any provision of this paragraph shall not obligation or liability of Contractor or City .. affect any right, - which accrued prior to such termination. 4 il. Cancellation for Cause. City may cancel all or any part of this Contract if Contractor in the event of any of the breaches any of the terms hereof or , following:, Insolvency of Contractor'; voluntary or invo u ntary ofa petition in bankruptcy by or against Contractor; appointment receiver or trustee for Contractor, or an assignment for benefit of �3 creditors of Contractor. Damages for breach shall be those allowed by 'Oregon law, reasonable and necessary 'attorney's fees, and other costs of litigation at trial and upon ap.raeal. 12. Access to Records. City shall have access to such books, documents, papers and retards of -Contrac tar as are directly 'pertinent to this Agreement for the § .<5 minatzon, excerpts and transcripts. purpose of making audit, exa1 ,x n G. C S TRACT FdR PERSONAL SERVICES PAGE 4 E 't pg l 13. Force ftieure. � Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default because of any delays in completion of responsibilities hereunder due to causes ` beyond the control and without I fault or negligence on the apart of the party so disenabled, including, but not restricted to, an act of C-od or of a public enemy, volcano, earthquake, fire,' flood, epidemic, quarantine, restriction, area---wide, strike, freight,embargo, unusually revere weather gar delay of subcontractor or supplies due to such cause; provide 'that the party so diserabled shall within ten (10) � days from the ;beginning of such delay notify the other party in writing -of the causes of delay and its 'probable extent. Such € notification shall not be the basis for a claim for additional �. compensation. 14. Won-Uaiver. P- 'The failure of the City to insist upon :or enforce strict performance by Contractor of any of the terms of this contract or to 'exercise any rights hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its right: to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any future occasion. 15. Warranties. All worst shall be guaranteed by the Contractor for a period of one r year after the mate of final acceptance of the cork by the Owner. � Contractor currants that all practices and procedures, workmanship � and materials shall be the best available,unless otherwise specified ~ in the profession. Neither acceptance of the work nor payment therefor shall relieve Contractor from liability under warranties contained in or implied by this contract. 16. Attorney's Fees In case suit or action is instituted to enforce the provisions of this contract, the parties agree that the losing party shall pay such sum as the Court may adjudge reasonable attorney's fees and court costs including attorney's fees and court costs on appeal. 17. Applicable taw. This contract will be governed by the laws of the State of Oregon. 18. Conflict Between Terms it is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument and the proposal of the Contractor, this instrument ,shallcontrol and nothing herein shall,be considered as an acceptance of the said teras of said proposal' conflicting herewith. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 5 19. indemnification. r Contractor agrees to indemnify and to hold harmless the City, its Officers, Employeesand Agents against and from any and all loss, claims, actions, suits, ;including costs and attorney's fees, for or on account of injury, bodily or otherwise, to, or death of persons, damage ,to or destruction of property belonging to Cita, Contractor or others, resulting from, arising out of, or in any array connected with Contractor's sole negligence. 20. Insurance. � Prior to starting work hereunder, Contractor, at Cont.actor's cost, shall secure and continue to carry during the term of this Contract, with an insurance,company acceptabl£ ;to City, the following insurance: € A. Public Liability and Property Damage insurance with . limits of not less than $500,000.00 for person injury, $500,000.00 for ` damage to property, $500,000.00 comprehensive automobile liability and $250,000.00 for broad form property damage coverage. Such insurance small:cover all risks arising directly or indirectly out of Contractor's activities or work hereunder, including the operations of its subcontractors of any tier. Such insurance shall include provisions or endorsements naming City, its Officers, Employees and Representatives as additional insureds, provisions that such insurance is primary insurance with respect to the interests of the City and that any anther insurance -maintained by City is excess and not contributory insurance with the insurance required hereunder;` cross--liability or severability of interest clause; and provisions that such policies shall not be cancelled or their limits of liability reduced without thirty (30) days prior notice to City. A copy �. of each insurance policy, certified as a true copy by an authorized representative of the issuing' insurance company, or �. at the discretion of City, in lieu' thereof, a certificate in -forma satisfactory to City certifying to the issuance of such insurance shall be furnished to City. B. Workman's Compensation from the State accident Insurance Fund or from a responsible private carrier. Private insurance shall provide the schedule of employee benefits required by law. C. Professional Liability Insurance, The Contractor shall have in force a policy of Professional Liability insurance in an amount of not less than $500,000.00. The Contractor shall keep such policy in force and current during the tern of this contract. D. Adequacy of Performance. Any 'insurance- bearing on adequacy of performance shall be maintained after completion of the project. Should such insurance be cancelled before the and of the guarantee period and the Contractor fails immediately to procure other' insurance-as specified, the City reserve the right to procure such insurance and to charge the cost thereof to the Contractor. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL. SERVICES - PAGE 6 1. `date Pareexaenc. This contract and any referenced attachments constitute the coal fete agreement between the City and Contractor and supercedes all prior U.ritten or oral discussions or agreements'. IN d4IT6'dESB fEERCOr, the City ha scaused this Agreement to be executed by its drily authorized undersigned officers, acting Pursuant to resolution of the City Cauncil, duly. Passed at the Regular Meeting held, on the of �ar2e _ _ 3rd day ree en�— --- 19 86 and the contractor has executed this an tine date hereinabo;re' first written. CITY OF 'b YGARD Hate 3Y: -- BY: CONTRACTOR «ate BY: BY: br33 6/86 CON"#R G FOR ' RSONAL SERVICES PAGE 7 d CITY OF TIGARD. OREGOIV COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 23, 3965 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: June '19, 1965 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of En�rineerind Contract For PREPARED BY: City Engineer 1l:,__ S dal Tiedeman Realignment REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OR: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Approval of contract for engineering services for the Tiedeman Avenue Realignment project. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed CZP budget includes funding for completionof design and right--of--way work for Tiedeman Avenue Realignment. MacKenzie Engineering Completed -the preliminary engineering report. Attached is a drawing showing the proposed realignment. The design will ;provide for ultimate development as shown; however, we propose to construct only a 30 foot street width with sidewalk only on the west side. Until the narrow Fanno Creek bridge is replaced, construction of the full street width and east sidewalk would have little benefit. The attached contract provides for MacKenzie Engineering to provide engineering services through the design phase, and also during construction if needed. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached contract for engineering services. 2. Direct that the contract be modified. 3. Stop work on the project. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the contract as submitted �. ibr333 f MA.CKENZIE ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED l)GaO S.W.k?AN('l3 l 1 ,A I*-T 1 PORK AND,OREGON 87201 (503)?24 9560 G June 10, 1986 t City of Tigard Attention Mr. ;dandy Wooley City Engineer 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Randy: RE: S.W. Tiedeman Street Realignment, Engineering Services Project Number186030.001 Thank you for the opportunity to continue service to the City of Tigard's Capital Improvements Program. The following °shall serve to document ;our fee and time schedule for completion of 'bid documents and construction services for the Tiedeman project. Task 1 Sensitive Lands Application Time and Materials, Not to Exceed $1,400.00 We will prepare the joint Corps/Division of State Lands application, Tigard Sensitive Lands Application, calculations, narrative and drawings. Processing of the application through the various agencies will be the responsibility of the city ofTigard. Our initial field review with Corps staff will include review of any abbreviated 'review processes that may be available for this project. Task 2: Final Engineering Design and Construction Documents Time and Materials. Not to Exceed $4,500.00 _ We will prepare final construction drawings and specifications, acceptable for advertisement and bidding. The specifications will follow either CSI or APWA format, as directed by,the City. The work will be commenced upon your verbal authorization, to be closely followed by a standard City Services Contract. Our work will be complete, ready for advertisement, not later than four weeks after corps approval is granted. Anpr& ► .i 3 pi IIIA IItill° Itij+il et° to I'I#rit.tjt I i t 1 t t 7 . f � ... _ I 1 f 6 �' i � 1�'1' 'T'f'm��s'I��'lijTl�-1�t1�;'�-��i ElEi!�Ei'IT�E�IiEIEi��tE�EtB�°ItIE'0++1T6°I°�°EliE6j't+j+f+tEllj+l��+lEj+E��+i+jt!°i+9+j ilE y NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. -- _ _ _ OtL 6Z BZ dZ 9Z SZ bZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 81 LE 91 5IY i l EI 7.1 II OI 5 9 L 9 5 b 6- __Z i�+b �mrulljun�uuhulaunixx�aa°Iaa�Ied� _ _ , ` p him-ARCH: 990 - _-..-_ QIIlttjttll�t111jIII1�I111jIl+I�IRIj1111't+++jlil�iliillA .. .._ - �.+..�. i ._- I --�1- ,�/ �,� .•� �•� �'� �"' �.I � EX1971NG(LOAD ,��.;:..•..... iN,\ ��REDIR,ECT CREEK /�,°•/ ....� I� /` •'. ..' i// - /k FLOW END51 ALIO aNDIE -TIN6r \ NEW I2�` 3TORw7 \1` j'�I� f ss/,. ;+%` ° •�; REMOVEA/JD EaRLACE�'fRARFIG SIGN f \SEwE2 UNE '� n -�yJ•J,R141SE wwrs vw&vE. EXTEND 101 CONCRETE j ^ PIPE" RELOCAYE - '� r FENCE-\� `< '�: r+�� '%' a ! -//� �1` y \�• �: i POWER POLE MAY NEED \ `�'�(/,fid- °°s"� '.•:.,: �*S� •>'� ; 1 / TO 15 R Y \ /---��{ STDf R 1 SIAL E EPLACED DUE / _7 .- �•" p 1 TO FILL Ts1°VAY NEW CATCH 1 1 GRAVEL viLIVB JGO N`EW\ - I > > p�ASIN 1 o I i• �IMPROVEMENT�. \ \ � - % RELOCATE FENCE L \ 1 I '\REMOVE AND RELOCATE "�•y.— '^• •'I `POWER POLE AND"I'ELeIIII E +.•`= \TED G.EN ! . RAISE C.B. RIM A5 REQUIRED i'. t •\\ '�;� �� 'd•.-.. RBMOV.@ 2.411 R6OW ) 514N INDICATING -""�" 'REI:OCATE C.B. i... Cu+ E stic,alT PROPOSED IMMOVF—ME.NT15 RELOCATE WATER METER �.. ILEL.00ATE MAILBOX - REMOVE 0- REPLACE TRAFFIC 516rN FIGURE .9- ° \REMOVE REFL.ECTOIX MACKEME ENGINEERING INCORPORATED. I ..• �� 0690 SIN BANCROFi ST PORTLAND OREGON 15W3 22,.9560 hillr�>JIi�Il1 klk�lll rlaa�k alk ala Ili ill eik eji la Til a ! -till �.i�iiafal[�la�kdl�aia611a�at}[]Irj+h�+ta�+i+dal,Jalr�ola1llii+aaja1litiapiia�F11 1_t 1 NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED i, -..-. . . .. 3 4 .. _ 5 - 6 7 _ 8 9 O j DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. _—_ - 0£ GZ @Z LZ 9Z SZ OZ Bt ZZ IZ 02 6t @I LI --91 _5 Irl Ea ZI — 11— 01 6 8 L 8 S -v E -Z I° nataaNPnululdaul�uuh,uNNalNsa�lanliida21tm 1111 11111=1I s — I 1 �m i I CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TITLE. S.W. TIEDEMAN AVENUE REAL IGNM NT ENGINEERING :SERVICES CONTRACT NO. : This Contract, made and entered into this ' 23rd day of July 1956 by and between the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, hereinafter' called "City" and Mull name and address of person or �. firm) Mackenzie Engineerinc, Incorporated, 0S�O 5W Bancroft Street1 Portland, Oregon 97201 hereinafter called "Contractor", duly authorized to perform such services in Oregon. W I N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City require services which Contractor is capable of providing, under terms and conditions hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, Contractor is able and prepared to provide such services as City does hereinafter squire, under those terms and conditions set forth; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION of those mutual promises and the terms' and conditions set forth hereafter, the parties agree as follows: 1. Project_Description. Contractor's services under this Agreement shall consist of the following: a. Contractor shall perform professional services, as outlined in the project proposal dated the 10th day of June, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The project for which services are to be provided is known as S.W. Tiedeman Avenue Street Real iqnment. e 2. Compensation. A. The City agrees to pay the Contractor not to exceed ; . 12,700 for performance of those "services provided herein, , ' which payment shall be based upon the following applicable terms: 1. A schedule of payments', as follows: (schedule set forth). Monthly upon receipt of invoice for services to date CONTRACT FOR PERSOMIAL, SERVICES — PACE 1 �a 00 M, I=" f I' Randy Wooley Project Number 186030.001 } June 10, 1986 Page 2 i l Task 3: Construction Services 4 Time and Materials Not to Exceed $32500-00 rate the proof the ess We will provide construction illp on be �availablesto �visiththe siterto review ! ; project. In addition, we n roblems, or suggestions. We estimate that contractor and City questions, R LO site visits will be' adequate for this project. . We will also provide, through our soils subconsuitant, critical checks on construction quality. This includes subgrade, base rock, and paving density k ro riate intervals. testing at app R We will upgrade the plans to "as-built" at the completion of the project. ' Stakin Task 4: Construction g Time and Materials Not to Exceed $3 Provide one set of each of the following stakes: a. Clearing limits b. Slope stakes c. Storm drain stakes d. Finish curb stakes at 25` on center While we realize that the City surveyfor crew hass item n the eeventp the City ort �c�eW1 gs effort, we have supplied a unavailable � urvey subconsultant, when regkired by the City on Len Schelskunavailable. y will be our s this project. I hope this adequately addresses our projected costs for engineering/surveying services on this project. Please do not hesitate to call with any.questions you may have. Sincerely, David G. Carson, P.E. Project Engineer DGL/eg 2. Payment by the City shall release the City from any farther obligation for ; payment to Contractor for service or {., . services performed or expenses incurred as of the date of the statement of services. Payment shall not be considered accestance 'or,approval of any work or waiver of any defect therein. S. The City certifies that Sufficient funds are available and. authorized for Expenditure to finance costs of this contract. a S. All work performed by the Contractor under this Agreement shall be the property of the City. 3. Contract Identification. The Contractor shall furnish to the City its employer identification number, as designated by the Internal Revenue Service, or Contractor's Social Security Mumber, as the City deems applicable. 4. Cita a s FdeGsresQ�otati me. For purposes hereof, the City's authorized representative will be the City Engineer, ' 13125 SW ?fall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223; (503) 639-4171. u. 5. Contractor's Representative. For; purposes hereof, the Contractor's authorized representative will bw David G Larson. 0590 SW Barcroft Street, Portland OR '97201 6. City's Obligations. In order to -facilitate "the work of the Contractor as above outlined, the City shall furnish to the Contractor access to all existing information which is in the City's possession concerning the location of sewer' and dater lines and ;other utilities or structures which affect the planning and construction of the proposed improvements, 7. Contractor is Independent Contractor. A. Contractor's services shall be provided under the general supervision of City's project director or his or her designee, but Contractor .shall be an independent contractor for all f purposes and small be entitled to no compensation other than the compensation provided for under paragraph 2 of this Agreement. CONTRACT FOR,,PERSONAL SERVICES PAGE 2 �. In the event Contractor is to perform the services described in this Agreement without the assistance of others, Contractor hereby agrees to file a joint declaration with City to the effect that Contractor's services are those of an independent contractor, _as pa�ovidad under Chapter 864 Oregon Lads 1.979. C. Contractor acknowledges that for all purposes; related to this � Agreement, Contractor 'is and shall ba deemed ` to be an � independent contractor and not an employee of the City, shall � not be entitled to benefits of any kind to which,an employee of the City is entitled and shall be solely responsible for all � payments and taxes required by law; and furthermore in the event ' that Contractor is found by a' court of law or an administrative' agencyto be an employee of the City for any purpose, City shall be entitled to offset compensation due to demand repayment of any amounts braid to Contractor under- the tests of this Agreement, to the full extent of any benefits or other renumeration` Contractor receives (from City or third party) as a result of said finding and to the full extent of any payments that City is required to make (to Contractor or to a third party) as a result of said finding. . D. The undersigned Contractor hereby represents that no employee of the City of Tigard, or any partnership or corporation in which a City employee has an interest, has or will receive any remuneration of any description ;from the Contractor, either directly or indirectly, in connection with the letting or ' _ performance of this contract, except as specifically declared in writing. 9. Subcontractors Assignment & Bcleaation. r` r; A. Contractor shall submit a list of subcontractors for approval by the City, and Contractor shall be fully responsible for the acts of subcontractors and of ,all persons employed an or omissions y by them, and neither the ;approval by City of any subcontractor note anything contained herein shall be deemed to create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and City. B. This .Agreement, and all of the covenants and conditions hereof, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the `Contractor respectively and their legal representatives. Contractor shall not assign any rights nor delegate any dudes incurred by this contract, or any part ' hereof without the written 'consent of City, any any assignment' or delegaUon in violation hereof shall be void. k, _ F 5 CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES PAGE 3 S" i g. gantrac or's Em sloyeeg medical payments. f promptly as due, to any person, The Contractor agrees to pay p shing medical, copartnership, association or corporation furni surgical, and hospital care or toher needed care the Contractor's employees,and �tall incident to sickness or injury e sums Which the Contractor agreed to pay for such services and all � monies and `suds +hich; the Contractor collected or deducted from contract or agreement for employers' w;Aaes pursuant to any ' lain, providing or paying for such services. d 10. ssrly Termination. A. This Agreement may be terminated without cause prior to the � expiration of the 'agreed upon term by mutual written' consent of the parties and for the following reasons authorized by ORS 3 279.326: 1, is suspended by an order of If work under the Contract a public agency for any reasonb Ga slabo�dto be dispute in the tby public interest other than by proceedingrelating reason of any :third party judicial to the wsork other thael suite or action filed in regard to;a labar dispute; or 2, If the circumstanced or conditions are such that it is sonable time to proceed with impracticable within a rea a substantial portion of the Contract by 3 B. Payment of Contractor shall be provido tereisRnataon279. arsda�hallak►e `. be prorated to and include _th y in full satisfaction of all claims by Contractor against City under this Agreement. C. Termination under any provision of this paragraph shall not x; affect any right, obligation or liability of Contractor or City which accrued prior to such termination. bi. Cancellation for Cause. ' cancel all or any part of this Contract if Contractor City may ' the terms hereof or in the evens of any of the breaches any el following: insolvency of Contractor; voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy by or against Contractor; appointment of a receiver or trustee for Contractor, or an assignment For benefit of creditors of Contractor. Damages for breach shall be those allowed by Oregon law, reasonable and necessary torney's fees, and other costs of litigation at trial and upon appeal. 12: Access to Records. City shall have access to such books, documents, papers and records f. nt to of Contractor as are directly pertinethis Agreement for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcripts. CONTRACT FdR PERSONAL SERVICES - PAGE 4 Ali 11 ME= 3 13. Force Maieure. tveither City nor Contractor shall be: considered in default because of any delays .in completion of responsibilities hereunder due to causes beyond the control and without fault or -negligence on the apart of the party so' disenabled, including, but not restricted to, an act of God or of a public'enemy, volcano, earthquake, fire, ,flood, epidemic, quarantine, restriction, area-wide strike, freight embargo, unusually severe weather or delay of subcontractor or 'supplies due to such cause: provided that the party so disenabled shall within tan (10) nays from the beginning of such delay 'notify the other party in writing of the causes of delay and its probable extent. Such notification shall not be -the basis for a "claim for additional compensation.' 14. ikon—Waiver. The failure of the City to insist upon or enforce strict performance by Contractor of any of the terms of this contract or to exercise any rights hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its right to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any; future occasion. 15. Warranties. X111 work shall be guaranteed by the Contractor for ',a period of one year after the date of final 'acceptance` of the work by the Owner. Contractor warrants that all practices and procedures, workmanship and materials shall be the best available unless otherwise specified in the profession. Neither acceptance of the work nor payment therefor ,shall relieve Contractor from liability under warranties contained in or implied by this contract. 16. Attorney's Fees. In case suit or action is instituted to enforce the provisions of this contract, the parties agree that the losing party shall pay such sum as the Court may adjudge reasonable attorney's fees and court costs including attorney's fees and court costs on appeal. 13. Applicable Law. This contract will be governed by the laws of the State of Oregon. 16, Conflict Between Terms. It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be .any conflict between the terns of this instrument and the proposal of the Contractor, this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the said terms of said proposal conflicting herewith. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 5 t f . w 1 `Indemnification. Contractor agrees to indemnify and to hold' harmless the City, its t Contractor officers, Ecsiployees and Agents against; and from any and all loss, including costs and ;attorney's fees, for or claims, actions, suits, i on account.: of injury, bodily or otherwise, to, or death' of persons, damage to or destruction of property belonging to City, Contractor or others, resulting from, arising out of, or in any way connected with Contractor's sole negligence. 20. insurance. Prior to starting work hereunder, Contractor, at Contractor's cost, shall secure and continue to carry during the term of this Contract, € with an insurance company acceptabl2 to City, the following insurance: A. Public Liability and Property Damage insurance with limits of not less than -$500,000.00 for person injury, $500,000.00 for damage to property, $500,000.00 comprehensive automobile liability and $250,000.00 for- broad form propertydamage coverage. Such insurance shall cover alll risks arising directly or indirectly out of Contractor's activities or wor% hereunder, including the operations of its subcontractors a any tier. such insurance shall include provisions or endorsements naming City, its 'officers, Employees and Representatives as additional insureds provisions that such insurance is primary insurance with respect to the interests of the :City and that any other " insurance maintained by City is excess and not contributory insurance with the insurance required hereunder; cross—liability or severability of interest clause; and provisions that such policies shall not be cancelled or their limits of liability reduced without thirty (30) days prior notice to City. A copy of each insurance pricy, certified as a true copy by an authorized representative of the issuing insurance company, or at the discretion of City, in lieu thereof, a certificate in form satisfactory to City certifying to the issuance of such insurance shall be furnished to City. B. Workman's Compensation from the State Accident Insurance Fund or from a responsible private carrier. private insurance shall provide the schedule of employee benefits required by law. C. Professional Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall have in force a policy of Professional Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than $500.000.00. The Contractor shall keep such policy in force and current during the term of this contract. s D. Adequacy of Performance. Any insearance bearing on adequacy of performance shall be maintained after completion of the project. Should such insurance be cancelled before the end of the guarantee period and the Contractor fails immediately to procure other insurance as specified, the City reserve the right to procure such insurance and to charge the cost thereof to the Contractor. CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES — PAGE 6 21. Complete Ac}reement. This contract and referenced attachments constitute the complete . agreement between the City and Contractor and saapercec.es all prior .. written or oral discussions or agreements r � WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be executed by ithe ts duly authorized undersignedofficers, the R Regular act ing pu held onant the —resolution day City Council, duly passed at the Regi-and the n�contractor has executed this; of June 33b ' Agreement on w•he date herea first written. CITY OF TIGARD BY- Date S. a CONTRACTOR BY: Date BY: br33 Sl86 s C1%TR6C'r r 0R PERSONAL SE�tVTCC:B — PAGE 7 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council June 23, 1985 FROM: John Savory, William Monahan SUBJECT: Downtown Council Finding On June 16th the City Council request additional information in support of the Downtown Council's request for ' the reprogramming of X1,500 from issues: for Downtown Council activity for Fiscal Year 5987. $g the issues: "Among, the A. Description of the project with,attention to the audiences, S: Explanation of the emphasis to be given on the Downtown Council. C Cost breakdown. D Haw the effort will coincide with the Chamber slide shave of five years ago. E. Outline of the slide' presentation. #4 A. Description of the Project The project was first prompted by a request by the I-5 Corridor Association for participation by the City in an area-wide marketing seminarscheduled for the fall. Tigard will have an present information about tile Opportunity to e City. available ` land, zoning, permit processing, economic development efforts, and targeted industries for attraction. Each city will provide space to display information throughout the day. The Economic Development Committee di3cussed this opportunity a few months ago and eventually determined that a slide show would be the best means of delivering Tigard°s message. In addition, the slide show can also be used in a' variety of settings to promote the City and downtown. The show can be taped for VHS for viewing by very small audiences. The expected audience is: • tib The I--5 seminar _ participants artici ants will be realtors for large companies w which place industries in our area. Realtors which focus on hi-tech firms will be among the participants, however, it is expected that generalist realtors will dominate. Representati+.jes of major companies, the State Economic Development Commission, and our fellow cities and I.._b members will attend. It will bean opportunity for us to show our City and its interest in economic growth. Page I (2) Companies"which-evaluate Tigard as a potential site for relocation or expansion. Again, the presentation will be evidence of our interest in ;growth. Utilizing VHS cassettes, we could send a tape to 4. companies requesting information which appear tobe serious prospects. The focus will be turned to existing businesses as well as northwest businesses, national companies, and perhaps overseas concerns. The emphasis will be on the regional market. I (3) Tigard's downtown property owners and businesses. Efforts of the Downtown Council to organize so far have not bee as successful as hoped. The Council has had difficulty getting the attention of many r of the potential members ' although meeting notices, 'surveys, and newspaper coverage have been utilized. A well prepared slide presentation could show the Council's direction and the City's potential in a way which attracts some membership. Overcoming the TURA failure has been a major problem. Until something starts to happen in the downtown, start.-up efforts for the Council may continue to be slow. (4) Tigard's Citizens. The slide show can put Tigard's best face forward now, at a time when Tigard is on the move. The City is building momentum as many positive things are happening. Capturing that momentum and spirit now for display at service clubs,.' neighborhood town hall meetings, and interested organizations could help,build the r spirit even more. f' B. Explanation of the Emphasis to be given to the Downtown Council. A major portion of the slide presentation will be devoted to depicting the downtown area as an area of prime concern to the City. Its accessibility, visibility, and redevelopment potential will be stressed. Starting with the Civic Center and new Chamber' offices, the area will be displayed as the prime area of concern for the City as Tigard works to develop and enhance its image as a City. Of the four areas of concern designated in the Economic Element of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan, the downtown is the only area which is not experiencing new economic growth totally on its own. The area needs City attention and assistanr.e. The message that the area's property ,is x available, zoned in a way which provides opportunity for many commL-rcial uses, and is scheduled to benefit from various capital improvement F projects can be sent by the presentation. C. Cost Breakdown. In May, Media West prepared an estimate of the cost of a professional slide presentation which would be of top quality. The original estimate was in the $6-7,000 range. Following discussion with the Economic Development Committee, the hard cost to Media West was reduced to $2,837. This was accomplished by the use of volunteer help to prepare the first draft of the script, photography of new items by volunteers to be included . in the show, use of slides from the Chamber show, and use of a volunteer narrator. 'The early discussions can this project brought to light the availability of highly qualified volunteers in Tigard. Use of their help accentuates the community's interest in economic development and will better assure that the project portrays Tigard as it really is. 6 Page 2 ; Cost of the project can be shown as follows: 6— 7,000 g Real 1 Cosi: $3,200 $4,200 estimate Volunteer value 2,837 'estimate N Media West Tee *- Pr^o____posed Allocations of Cost „ Volunteer Services $3,200 – $4,200 . $1,500 City of. Tigard ; 500 Downtown Council $ 800 _ $ 900 � 'Private Contributions The proposed share of 'j;1.500 represents approximately 25% of the City itures plus'volunleers hours). total cost of the project (expendt D. How the project will coinicide with the Chamber slide show of five years ago. resentation is a high quality presentation. ` obviously, The Chamber slide p in over that five year since 'Tigard has been the fastest growing City ber show does, however, have period, many slides are slidesowh ch areut of useful.Gh Slides portraying the essence many high quality of Tigard remain valuable. The Chamber will be an active participant in this project. They have presentation their show available to us. 41e expec agreed to make copies of t to work. closely with them so that the end result will be a slide }z �V the City with focus on downtown, plust the Chanter will have access to new slides to update their show. E. outline of the Slide Presentation, first daft is ' outline of the show will be developed when betThe actual highlighted in the prepared for the show. At least the following Will show: Introduction to the City .- Fjistory – Demographicsant two years Future direction building on the success o+ the p 2. Available Land/Existing Industry Discussion of the City,s Potential Display of existing 6kajo businesses (Gerber, Williams, etc. Office Parks Industrial Parks 3, Focus on Commercia.l/Industrial Areas – Development Potential – Downtown Tigard – Cascade Blvd. 72nd Avenue area ` – Tigard Triangle r, page 3 K` 4. Attributes of the City and the Developable area -- Transportation access - Market access Public improvements - Labor force - Education system . - Recreation resources - Housing supply 5. Community Leader/Ambassadors > - Statement with photos of civic; and business leaders concerning Why Tigard is a good place to do business. Information on who to contact Community Development Dept. for permit, land, demographic information. . Chamber for areawide information and business assitance ` 6. Invitiation to visit the City with a sign-off by the Mayor The program will be prepared with the knowledge that it must be updated on a regular basis ' to be effective. With this in mind, the group of volunteers from 'the Downtown Council, Cityu, and general public; will esta�alish a schedule fszr future saeetings to meet and continue the effort on an ongoing basis. l WAM:brf d j 25 f t Page 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: June 16, 1986` AGENDA ITEH 4: a, .w DATE SUDHIT ED.- _.Tune 9, 1986 PREVIOUS A IOIN: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Downtown Council Fundin2 Discussion PREPARED BY: _ — REQUESTED B1: DEPARTMENT HEMS OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ' ,saeseammamaaae�amos��aamamm�bmmmmmam-m--mmvcamaammaa—®amm=-.=awa-rr,, -sn---------- POLICY ISSUE Should the City'; repr.ioritize a portion of funds allocated to the Downtown Council to an economic development marketing project proposed by the Downtown Council and Economic Development Committees. esmmmsaraaxamuffim,xaamwcmzmea�aarsn:riasm:ammmmam�ascaaamsasmmsaamaamm®aewe®aama.mmmaamsnm�m®ee�r.�®.mm�nas INFORMATION SMOMY .x✓ The City Council has budgeted $10,000 in the Community Development administration budget as a contribution to activities of the Downtown Council. The Council now would like to reprioritize $1,000 to $1,500 of that amount to a slide presentation to attract business to Tigard. Preliminary discussions with ?redia West, a;producer of visual presentations, revealed that $2,837 is required to produce a quality slide presentation while making use of many volunteer resources. John Savory will be present to discuss the project. ass---a---= aam-a- ------=a.*aR--------a--s----as---- ----------®,.a,.. --- ALTERNAT1VES CONSIDERED 1'. Reprioritize a portion of the City's commitment to the Downtown Council to. a marketing presentation. 2. Take no action. SUGGESTED ACTION The City Council should discuss the project with t:epreser:ting the Downtown Council and Economic Develarpnent Committee and reprinr.:.Y_ize the, funds requested. ka; 6 , -1tv x .y l t., F SOUTHWEST OFFICE . SUPPLY 22245 S. J.gain Street Porband,Oregon 97223 Ph.539-3179 ;1 E 3 June 9, 1956 { 0: The P�iayor and City Council 0: purpose in being an your agenda is to ask that $1500.0rJ of the $1±0,Q s 00 earmarked for the Downtown Council be re-allocated for the purpose of having a slide/video presentation developed to show potential developers and business people the advantage locating in the Tigard area. The original cost of this project was a}aout, $7,000 but through the judicious use of volunteers such as Council Brian the cost;of the project has been reduced to $2800.00 - $290 .00. if you approve the expenditure of $3.500.00 ; to $280city funds $29for this project, the Downtown Council will contribute $500.00, leaving about $800.fD0 - $900.Q0 to be raised by other means. The presentation would feature Tigard's IusinLss com°rue s and would emphasize our growth potential. it would, in its slidde show format be suitable :for presentations before large audiences and the video version would be ideally suited for smaller audiences of up to 10 people. As a tool for aiding economic development this project is fairly inexpensiveadvertising. Prompt consideration of this proposal' is necessary as it requires ` several. months to put this together and the first opportunity for a` showing is in September at a meeting of developers and real estate brokers sponsored by the 1-5 Corridor- Committee. s r iftl I 1� Ii1\\�,1 it 4. )nVli� ini�;lri r;l� May ,19, 1986 I11�'t x �t:1Ti,j Jahn c Savory. Vice President Southwest office Supply 5245 S.W. Main Street Portland, ©R 97223 Dear John, Thant you for giving Media West,' Inc. the opportunity to submit an estimate 'for assisting you with your slide presentation to attract business to the Cit�oo�ami£orayoulwithinnyoarnbudget. t that we can produce a top quality P g Media Wast, Inc. has been in the audio/visual productionwi industry for mord: than •12 years. we are a full-service company _ erienced and talented people: writers, producers, staff of exp Of directors, technical camera peaple, and lab tec�hrn�'tral0inAevery .. g uC111'{.Y r mark is done in-house, ensuring �-- aspect of, your production from concept to° completion. It would be a pleasure to work with you on thisproject for the City of Tigard, as well as continue to work with you to meet your developing'conununicat ion needs. Sincerely, e Foley Sales Manage MEDIA WEST,_ INC. enc `SF/epb r .� �l_.• .'�r• }c.l.c';hF.t 4�r•u ,r. t/,t��=i (')llil( �fil•l�) k. WHY MEDIA WEST, '1NC.? nnnication strategies We understand business, and hoer to build. conu that contribute to financial success. F,d3e are message oriented. our strategies, programs and productions are Communication TOOLS - not ends 'in themse3ves -- created to deliver specific messagesinthe most effective manner. ' We aregual ty oriented. We believe that good communication farsighted planning, disciplined requires careful research, reativ4-y 'and well-managed execution. - ne oriented. We understand budget limitations, We are bottom-linewitiniveess and are tom='nitt ° dWe1strive tox'Obtainimum fmaximumnmileageh d., from pre-defined buaets our clients' communication investments. - We are flexible. Wetodae'�stto ghhcompetrapid-fire marke�place�t We inevitably occur in y know how to marshall our resources to meet client needs, no matter how urgent. - We are not limited to a specific medium. We have expertise in the entire range of audio-visual and print media. We use only those media which clearly meet project criteria. - We offer a broad range of client services, making us a "one stop" shop. ride in our creativity, communication design and We take p but we utilize these -tools to meet client needs, craftsmanship, not to satisfy egos. } s ; ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Media West is pleased to have the opportunity to prepare an estimate for the city of' Tigard's presentation. We have based the estimate on providing production support services to supple- ment the work that members of your organization and other groups in Tigard will contribute. Y As outlined by John Savory, Tigard community members ,will provide the rough draft of the script all photography, and talznt for narrating the audio track. Media West will offer services in fine-tuning the script which includes visualization, art and production for the grpahic slides, recording the sound track, and transferring the program to video. We will also prepare for you duplicate copies of either the slide sound program or video program. We have estimated that approximately 25% of the slides will be graphic title slides and approximately 10 of the photographic slides will be split fraomes. This is for estimating purposes basedonan average slide program. AUDIO-VISUAL PHWHAM 102ii t;.\\ COST ESTIMATE:SHEET Arctic Drier Eli ncra,n Date 5/19/86 Orggc )I)T0 5 Pnurrn at luual nnansattin 6 Minutes t Clienrs Name SOUTHWEST OFFICE SUPPLY Approx Running Time �� , Address 7 F�, t4 Maid oSTre_p'h Approx Visuals or Scenes 80-100 r��r aid`C3R 9 X22 Completion Date Phone � 7� Estimate Prepared 8y Sue Fole i Contact 7nInp Program Description P�QZXZ Type of Production � a�p �a7 -�- lousiness to the F City of Ticard. PRE-PRODUCTION SERVICE EST. HESS RATE TOTAL COMMENTS Research 2 $50/hr 100.00 Treatment!Propesal $50/hr int Draft`Script $50/hr Client Provided end Draft Script f $50!hr 300.00 ' Storyhoarding $35/hr '-,ent Meetings 2 �a50lhr 100 00 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous IS 500.00 t; TOTAL PREPRODUCTION t PRODUCTION SERVICE EST. HRS RATE TOTAL COMMENTS Loc,Film/Video Camera $90/hr 2 person crew w/equip: Asst Carneraperson $35/hr Gaffes Grip $35/hr :: Soundperson $45/hr P , Client Provided Photography Photographer-Still $52/hr Producer 10 $50/hr $ 500.00 Director S50/hr ' studio/2 person crew/equip. Studio Rental $135/hr Additional Camera $50/hr including oper./equip. �---- Other ..,deo Stock Film Stock .Set Construction ------------ On-Carrera Talentr ,:4G h. 45 .001 YnVIsV�,s wiv t�..unt�1.. SERVICE EST. HRS RATE TOTAL COMMENTS Sound Edit E Mix ter 135.00 _-- Narrator's Fee Client provided Materials-Sound 2010-0, Audio Ta e Music/SFX Fees S80.00 160.00 2 Music Selections Art/Typesetting 500.00 For Graphic Slides Materials-"Art 50.00 Transfers 95.00 Transfer Slides to Va eo Optical Printing Graphic Slides, p it 600.00 Props Travel Per-'.Diem Lab Fees Rental PMisceliareous Miscellaneous _-- $2,105.00 TOTAL PRODUCTION: POST-PRODUCTION: SERVICE EST. QTY RATE COMMENTS Edit-Slide 2 $45/hr $ 90.00 Edit-Vides $100/hr _ Programming 1 - $55.00 55.00" Pulse Audio Tape Materials Video $75.00 75.00 1" Tape for Video Master Slide Trays/Mounts Miscellaneous 1` $12.00 12.00 Audio Cassette Master Miscellaneous Miscellaneous TOTAL POST-PRODUCTION: $ 232.00 DUPLICATION: SERVICE EST. HRS RATE TOTAL COMMENTS Slide Dupes Filmstrip Dupes Video Dubs Film Dupes` Audio Cassette Cub Miscellaneous Miscellaneous .•nr. nrirn trnTa r�ei f � t • , s SUMMARY: E PRE-PRODUCTION ESTIMATE S 500-00 PRODUCTION ESTIMATE t'2�105 00 POST-PRODUCTION ESTIMATE S 232 00 DUPLICATION ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE �2 837 00 — N K-I'LlCer"Of USU;l (A)171mu it icatk ns lnc(.x}x)mtkd S.11' PLEASE NOTE: THE ABOVE (QUOTATION IS AN ESTIMATE, NOT A FIRM BID, BASED ON OUR PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS. IF ANY OVERAGES OCCUR, YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY, AND WITH YOUR APPROVAL, CHARGED FOR 'THOSE OVERAGES CONVERSELY, IF A PROJECT IS COMPLETED FOR UNDER THE ESTIMATE, THOSE SAVINGS WILL BE PASSED ON' TO` YOU. C TUALATIN VALLEY t Economic Development Corporation 4, June 10, 1986 F Hon. John E. Cook City of Tigard, PO :Box 23357 Tigard, OR 97223 � L Bear --Jahn, �. Seldom, if ever, do we have the opportunity to leverage activities within the Metropolitan region, ,to the benefit � of Washington County. However, we may have a great "opportunity" now. ; Business and political leaders from Portland have scheduled a gate on the regional convention center for this November. To gain passage for the $65 million proposal, , they need the united support- of Washington County business and political leader-s. The proposal, to build a convention center to serve this region, is a positive, well thought � out initiative. It is this proposal that creates the leverage we couldn't generate on our own. The :issue is clear. The economic structure and future of Washington County is tied directly to our transportation, system.. That system now is inadequate. Improving the y transportation system must he our first, second and third p priority, and we must work together to see it get done. I have spoken to many business leaders and politicans in Washington County. To` a person they agree that our- support of the Convention Center must be tied to commitments made by the City of Portland. These commitments are three fold. First, recognition that Washington County needs a major North/South transportation system. This, by the way, will have direct,and positive effects on Portland. Second, there must be a commitment that Washington County � receive its appropriate allocation of money to provide funding , levels necessary to solve our transportation problems beyond the North/South issues. Finally a long term Issue, that we all work to change the gas tax allocation � formula for transportation dollars that currently works against our county. Without these commitments, our cpp, support, in spite of the 'merits of the convention center, f must be weighed very carefully. i 4755 S.W. Griffith Dr. e Suite 310 o Beaverton.. Oregon 7()05 ® (503) 626-4050 k The TVEDC has Inid out an ambitious program to address these isues. It won't happen if we get last in a debate Over specific projects or compromised by short term promises. It especially won't happen if ve don't work together to see it through. Your input Is necessary for success. On behalf of the TVEDC andother organizations affiliated with this effort, I would encourage your can munlcation, cooperation acid support. The agenda prepos3ed, must be a Ruccess. Si. ere' y P V ;Phillips President ` PVP.Ecl . cccBoard of Directors i 4. w JI , l ,: MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON! TO: City Council June 19, 1985 FROM: Planning staff l.I'Ji SUBJECT: Katherine St. LID August 11, 1980 — Katherine St. LID formed and assessment adopted'. Mr. Lowrey's assessment was based on 5 lots. Under the Development Code provisions in effect at ;that 'time, < 5 Tats seems reasonable, however, some fill would have been required. Filling in floodplain areas in residential zones was allowed at that time. August 24, 1982 — Frank Currie wrote a letter responding to Mr. Lowrey's letter regarding how his assessment was calculated. Frank's letter assumed the Code provisions that were still in force from 1980 which would allow fill in residential areas. November, 1983 — The Community Development Code and Comp Plan policies were adopted which are in effect today. There are policies contained in the current Comp Plan documents which prohibit filling within the 100 year floodplain on property zoned for residential uses. Under these provisions, Mr. Lowrey would probably be able to get 3 lots out of his property. Mr. Lowrey has chosen to Bancroft his assessment over a 20 year period. He has paid: $3,577.05. Mr. ' Lowrey stili owes: $9,430.80. (cn/59 ;k.