Loading...
City Council Packet - 02/24/1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an (; REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate C BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FEBRUARY 24, 1986, 7:00 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 10865 SW WALNUT asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator, 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Cali 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items: Motion to approve as amended. 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION 1-86 - 108th & Durham - NPA #6 A request by Mr. & Mrs. Thoennes, Mr. & Mrs. Nesvold, Mrs. Ogle, Mr. & Mrs. Funchess, Roger Speece, and Mrs. Vandewater to annex 33.41 acres into the City of Tigard. The property is located south of SW Durham Road and east of SW 108th and to zone the property in conformance with the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Tax Map/Lot # Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 2S1 15A 400 & 401 Wash. Co. R-5 City of Tigard R-4.5 2S1 15AD 100/200/300/400 Wash. Co. R-5 City of Tigard R-4.5 2S1 148 800 Wash. Co. R-7 City of Tigard R-7PD & R-12PD 2S1 148 600 & 601 Wash. Co. R S-1 City of Tigard R-12PO o Public Hearing Opened Motion to continue public hearing, at applicant's request, to March 10, 1986 4. PUBLIC HEARING - KRUEGER ZONE CHANGE ZC 3-86 & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE CPA 1-86 - NPO #7 A request by Marge Krueger to move a four acre area which is designated Neighborhood Commercial in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and zoned CA (Commercial Neighborhood) from the west side of 135th Avenue to a location on the north side of the proposed Murray Blvd. extension, approximately 500 feet west of 135th Avenue. The subject property is located between 135th Avenue and Scholls Ferry• Road approximately 1/4 mile north of Walnut Street (WCTM 1S1 33C, Tax Lot 1000). o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments a Public Hearing Closes o Consideration By Council 5. SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE TRANSFER - Frank's Sanitary Service o Community Development Staff COUNCIL AGENDA -- FEBRUARY 24, 1986 - PAGE 'i 6. ORDINANCE NO. 86- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.28.130(53), OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PROHIBITING PARKING ON A PORTION OF SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. o Acting Chief of Police 7. ORDINANCE NO. 86 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.137 TO PROVIDE FOR A DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE ON SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. d a Acting Chief of Police 8. URBAN SERVICES POLICY DISCUSSION a City Administrator -11 9. ORDINANCE NO. 86- AN RELATINGTOOFFICERS AND 6 AND DEPARTMENT HEADSNG ORDINANCE NO. , DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. o Legal Counsel '0. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 10.1 Approve Council Minutes - January 28, 1986 10.2 Receive and File: o Departmental Monthly Reports - January, 1986 o Community Development Land Use Decisions 10.3 Approve OLCC Applications and Authorize Forwarding To OLCC: Renewal Applications o Tigard Bowl, 11660 SW Pacific Highway, RMB Application o Circle K Store #572, 9930 SW Walnut Street, PS Application o Godfather's Pizza, 12286 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. , R Application o Savory Sandwich, 242 Tigard Plaza, R Application a Greenway Pub, 12272 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. , RMB Application Change of Ownership 6 Change Of Privilege Application: o Funnelli's Pizza, 14385 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application 10.4 Adopt Criterion For City Administrator Performance Review 10.5 Accept Unified Sewerage Agency Street Dedication - SW Burnham 10.6 Approve Quitclaim, 99W Frontage Road, State of Oregon - Res. 86-27 10.7 Approve County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards - Memorandum of Understanding and Authorize Signatures 10.8 Approve Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement - Tigard Christian Church - O'Mara 6 Hall 11. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a) S (h ) to discuss employment of public officer/employee and current/pending litigation issues. 13. ADJOURNMENT lw/3684A COUNCIL AGENDA = FEBRUARY 24, 1986- PAGE 2 t � , T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — FEBRUARY 24, 1986 — 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian (arriving at 7:11 PM) and Jerry Edwards; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2. QUORUM ISSUES a. Mayor Cook noted that until Councilor Brian arrived, there would be no quorum. Decision was made to proceed and review agenda items until a quorum was present for action. 3. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator noted supplemental information was distributed for various agenda items and staff recommended pulling item 10.8 for consideration at a later meeting. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA: No one appeared to speak. 4. URBAN SERVICES POLICY DISCUSSION a►.' City Administrator synopsized urban services policy issue. He noted areas of interest and highlighted the City's option to offer to provide services in unincorporated areas under contract with the County with payment being made by the County or upon annexation to the City. He noted the time is appropriate to make efforts to community the City's position with County officials. 4 COUNCILOR BRIAN ARRIVED: 7:11 P.M. — QUORUM WAS PRESENT. b. Lengthy discussion followed regarding annexation and urban services policy. Council consensus was to hear public hearings at this point in the meeting and take this discussion up after those were completed. PUBLIC HEARING — ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION 1-86 — 108th Durham — NPO & A request by Mr. & Mrs. Thoennes, Mr. & Mrs. Nesvold, Mrs. Ogle, Mrs. Funchess, Roger Speece, and Mrs. Vandewater to annex 33.41 acres into the City of Tigard. The property is located south of SW Durham Road and east of SW 108th and to zone the property in conformance with the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Tax Map/Lot Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 2S1 15A 400 S 401 Wash. Co. R-5 City of Tigard R-4.5 2S1 15AD 100/200/300/400 Wash. Co. R-5 City of Tigard R-4.5 2S1 148 800 Wash. Co. R-7 City of Tigard R-7PD & R-12PD 1 2S1 148 600 & 601 Wash. Co. R S-1 City of Tigard R-12P0 4 a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue the public hearing to 3/10/86, per the applicant's request. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page- 1 -COUNCIL MINUTES -- FEBRUARY 24, 1986 6. PUBLIC HEARING - KRUEGER ZONE CHANGE ZC 3-86 6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE CPA 1-86 - NPO #7 A request by Marge Krueger to move a four acre area which is designated Neighborhood Commercial in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and zoned C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) from the west side of 135th Avenue to a location on the north side of the proposed Murray Blvd. extension, approximately 500 feet west of 135th Avenue. The subject property is located between 135th Avenue and Scholls Ferry Road approximately 1/4 mile north of Walnut Street (WCTM 1S1 33C, Tax Lot 1000). a. Public Hearing Opened b. Keith Liden, Senior Planner, presented staff report and noted the requirements to relocate the 4 acre design of Commercial-Neighborhood zoning due to the Murray Boulevard extension relocation. C. Public Testimony: Proponents o Russ Krueger, 3515 SW Barbur Blvd. , outlined the history of the request and suggested this could be approved now with the understanding that if the extension of Murray Blvd. were slightly relocated in the future the design could then be limited or modified to allow for 4 acres of development. o Frank Ossman, owner of lot 100 in area, noted support of the relocation and of the land use application. d. Senior Planner Liden recommended approval newly submitted map to be attached to the ordinance and marked Exhibit "B". e. Discussion followed regarding whether the parcel should be 4 or 5 acres and the location. City Administrator stated the proposed location would not be affected by the tentative location of Murray Boulevard. f. Public Hearing Closes g. ORDINANCE NO. 86-12 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 1-86) AND ZONE CHANGE (ZC 3-86) PROPOSED BY MARGE KRUEGER. h. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt ordinance with newly distributed Exhibit "8" attached. i. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to amend Section 2 of the ordinance to show the parcel to be 5 acres of C-N zone designation. Motion to amend was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 86-12, as amended, was approved by unanimous vote ,of Council present. Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1986 a:. 7. SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE TRANSFER - FRANK'S SANITARY SERVICE a. City Administrator noted additional material distributed for Council information. He further stated that Lorry & Iva Leichner would need to conform to franchise requirements upon transfer. Staff recommended Council approval of the transfer. b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to authorize the transfer and direct staff to develop proper documents be prepared for the franchise transfer. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. S. ORDINANCE 140. 86-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.28.130(53), OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PROHIBITING PARKING ON A PORTION OF SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. a. Acting Chief of Police Jennings synopsized the request and recommended approval. He noted this would allow 4 more parking spaces on Main Street. b. Discussion followed regarding the potential for the creation of a traffic hazard in the area. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 9. ORDINANCE NO. 86-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAP- TER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.137 TO PROVIDE FOR A DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE ON SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. a. Acting Chief of Police Jennings synopsized the request and recommended approval. b. Discussion followed regarding the need for a time limit on the loading zone request. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. d. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to amend by adding a sentence to the newly created section of the code as follows: "Use shall be limited to 30 minute intervals". Motion to amend was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Ordinance 86-14, as amended, was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24, 1986 10. URBAN SERVICES POLICY DISCUSSION - Continued a. Discussion followed regarding the provision of urban services in the unincorporated areas of interest surrounding Tigard. City Administrator stated the intent of the meeting was not to set the policy but to direct work on the policy discussion with the County. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to send a Tetter to the Washington County Board of Commissioners expressing the City's interest to discuss the policy issues. (A copy of the letter is attached and made a part hereof). Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. C. Consensus of Council was to also direct a letter to the Board Chairman of the Metzger Water District regarding the same matter. (Copy is also attached and made a part hereof) . 11. ORDINANCE N0, 86-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 86-11 RELATING TO OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. a. Legal Counsel recommended Council adopt the proposed ordinance so that the hiring of the new Chief of Police would be under an "at will - without cause" doctrine. He noted that another ordinance would be presented for consideration at a future meeting regarding other staff positions. ` b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian, to adopt. :s Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 12. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 12.1 Approve Council Minutes - January 28, 1986 12.2 Receive and File: o Departmental Monthly Reports - January, 1986 o Community Development Land Use Decisions 12.3 Approve OLCC Applications and Authorize Forwarding To OLCC: Renewal Applications o Tigard Bowl, 11660 SW Pacific Highway, RMB Application o Circle K Store #572, 9930 SW Walnut Street, PS Application o Godfather's Pizza, 12286 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. , R Application o Savory Sandwich, 242 Tigard Plaza, R Application o Greenway Pub, 12272 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. , RMB Application Change of Ownership & Change Of Privilege Application: o Funnelli's Pizza, 14385 SW Pacific Hwy., R Application 12.4 Adopt Criterion For City Administrator Performance Review _ 12.5 Accept Unified Sewerage Agency Street Dedication - SW Burnham 12.6 Approve Quitclaim, 99W Frontage Road, State of Oregon - Res. 86-27 12.7 "Approve County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards - $ Memorandum of Understanding and Authorize Signatures 12.8 Approve Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement - Tigard Christian Church - O'Mara & Hall Page 4 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1986 a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt consent agenda with the deletion of 12.8 to be scheduled at a future meeting for consideration and the addition of the following items to 12.3: o Renewal Application for Skipper's Seafood & Chowder House, 11685 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Change of Ownership for Los Baez Mexican Restaurant, 11475 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application b. Councilor Edwards discussed various questions on items under consent agenda consideration. Motion to adopt the consent agenda with changes was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. MON-AGENDA ITEMS: No items were discussed. REGULAR SESSION RECESSED: 8:06 P.M. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 8!17 P.M. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a) & (h ) to discuss employment of public officer/employee and current/pending litigation issues. eputy City Recorde — City of Tigard ATTEST: Z�A�- . � or = City of Tigard `LW/3752A Page 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1986 r ciTYOFTIFARD February 20, 1986 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON Board of County Commissioners Washington County, Oregon 150 N. Main Hillsboro, OR 971.23 SUBJECT: Tigard Arta Urban Services Honorable Persons: The City of Tigard wishes to express its support of the County's stated Urban Services goal. With the recent agreement between Beaverton and Tigard along Scholls Ferry/Hall/Taylors Ferry roads, our Northern annexation area of interest is now set. Our interest boundary on the East is the County line, Southern along the Tualatin/Durham/King City city limits, and Western along he regional Urban Growth Boundary. The City of Tigard is prepared to examine the provision of Urban Services to the Metzger/Washington Square and Bull Mountain communities within these annexation areas of interest outside the City either by contract with the county or upon annexation to the City. -; Additionally, the City is willing to extend its Active 131_n Agreement with the ' county to fully include these areas of interest. The City is wilting to provide current planning, building code and engineering services within these areas on a user's fee basis. 4 Please let us know how we might be of further assistance and how we might best proceed on this matter. Yours truly, �W 4...k John Cook -. Mayor (JC:pm51) mss... -4171 12755 SW.ASH P.O.BOX 23397,', TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639 Q #At• .� ,�— w w;Cia • J>•— `Zt. t i� _ - ,` ~ wM• ••7 r. pit i `_ dam..`,'_—,_,•_ _ • :'!•:�lr T, ! it 6 �i ,w d • rr,r 1 t �w!'•j •rwvfl Q• 1 '' s's • . . .!•. .:�.� �•i ��;•' V t: b \, •f CO~�9w`1 �!:.Q •i � __ '+ r1. ` 7Jt N .:yry, • � � . Af :!S r • r�-3�•a r S _ � ,'" 3 , '� 1, + •� , '-tom '< •�i _ � �..� �a- �• •' _'.Y \ ,x � r ,�•+ , a \,_—_.�� as�► `, xet S tet, + j��, r b• ;�> tf i }•S. y•t'i 5 - 4 /��� „ Nor !J j! �+� IY �_m a . • • � Y- � . 4 fff —{ ..;�•aJ..«• � �••�..d gni z��;C..• r •;�+.; tSEµ++�•�•' -.- .•,�; \ •mfr - if • •* .� a �. •?ti.:•::.�}}_?•. q �it t• I� 'Y rlt.: a1 :.�'JIr,�•(�^t \ RfTI !'J'P... • Jt..Vr:•}?:•}: ,.T �J •Iy.Aft .':1;....� �• ~• llf::�:`:"�.. '••: fn � ri � 8 �,>.. '. rrT: t Qa• Ira �' ° • ! •�.'•;:•• '• ■ Sa'a'r• � a S•„ ¢ �Q •y Y ?^ I� Y AY7�`i. ' ,.:�.'.��•i���"' �': ,' G� R ��. i ,�,Y—,�,,.�_ _:_~ ��yra.___ t —t. x..a..•-�i:`ii?:�fci�°:r�: ....... - } w . d � cf) J zccn� O_ O w ac Ld 1 - o- w xF- z ar WZ n F- c�F- Z U- a j February 21, 1986 CiTYOF T1VARD WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON Mr. Ray Pirkl, Chairman Metzger Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ray: City and District staff have met and discusses Tigard's stated annexation area of interest in the Metzger/Washington neighborhood. I understand that the Board has asked the City to outline its thoughts in this area as it might relate to the Metzger Water District. Attached is a map showing the City's annexation areas of interest boundaries: the County line on the East, Tualatin/Durham/King City on the South, the Regional Urban Growth Boundary on the West, and the recently negotiated Beaverton—Tigard line along Scholls Ferry/Hall/Taylors Ferry roads to our North. Tigard is willing to provide needed urban services in these areas and to support annexation proposals from area residents and property owners. This does not, however, have any necessary effect on the City's relationships to our area's Water Districts. As to the City's interests as they might relate to the Metzger Water District: 1. The City's primary goal is to assure the delivery of urban services to the community in order to support a strong local economy and livable neighborhoods. Our current relationship with the District meets this goal. 2. The City is not proposing any changes in Water Districts, but seeks to continue the current good working relationship between the City and the two Water Districts currently within City limits. The City would welcome the opportunity to meet with the Board to discuss your concerns in this regard. Please let us know if we may be of any further assistance. Yours truly, John Cook Mayor (BJ:pm/1149p) 12755 S.W.ASH P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 -- �-� �•. 14i _•t- �M. '�y w--�R�1�� �y-�I--� J I t �' �.�'e � � w i!� p r •� Vl `� r j •� ��� jEL • � S a Ix lz t:. On T& iIrH - •... s Ir n i{� P � � ��__l y _ *� � Pr 1 '• 2 f It •'• "'S.L,�181..0. .-.� i ..rt♦ua! �' • -"• . se���" � i\'•-'..fr ��•�•R"yf �j "•''1 � _-..�.. cc y ! -la.ar•i :i?... .raw. _ .�•.' al0a 1 •}•r :r,.,•:'} ' ti+ ...i+phi•M� •� S �, t �F.i� :j• :•JI.•.tt.. .P 4 ��If:�.�'*� _ .>� S e 3AV •` HI SII Y._•• •' .:t:lii ..aR�'•RR _ `— Li .' �YYYOI Ii �• • Li ii'S' _..J W Z 3 Ce W clrf tillT.N. v 0 awe_1L x F-U Q <0 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6619 P.O.BOX B 684-0360 Notice EAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ( FEB 2 7 1966 Legal Notice Advertising *City 1yOW YGM&d • 0 Tearsheet Notice P. O. Box 23397 • p Duplicate Affidavit •Tigard, OR 97223 • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. I.Donovan L. Mack being first duly sworn, depose and say that i am the Advertising Director,or his principal clerk,of the m; a r d mime s a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Ti gar d in the aforesaid county and state;that the niiv n�i� RpouInr Meeting Naticf- a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and consecutive in the following issues: Feb Subscribed a rn to before me this P Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 0/88 AFFIDAVIT a = 3 im ll v+r Or ;j 4 ` -+ Ep A tp Cc Cc, rL CD 00 U m O ... Z 4 13 •}o r .,. a cc eo v o +• Z CL a ...1 z O 3 OQ a �a to m x 00 126 0W Mco mom CM Mi L A wry Z � a62 o @ c3 CL C Y. F� O� N Q mid m-0.m s 3 O O G.�" , m U a7 C V CL•p' L C O bo M ZZ Z OGmmC 1 X H N O 0 d aj °° CL_ = m r I v c c o w o . oc3 �t a9 °• ° c m m LL w mcti w 0 6 y' o m O� mw0m� � w o o +' W Z +� ae v 3� m c m m 0 U U. U' w H yU -:1.a as m W tot +Q` CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the R=Pofte& Adopted Ordinance Numbers 86-12, 86-13, 86-14, 86-15 STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard ) I, Loreen R. Wilson being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 86-12, 86-13, 86-14, 86-15 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated February 24, 1986 copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 27t day of February ,x12fiSx 1986. 1. Tigard City Pall, 12755 SW Ash, Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Police Department, 9020 SW Burnham, Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Public Library, 12568 SW Main Street, Tigard, Oregon } fL�+vt wl Subscriped and sworn to before me this "`day of Qprj. Zg8B*x 1986. , 44 i Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: (2 .o7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86-1C?-- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS HANGE (ZC86) CONCLUSIONS AND '3PROPObED APPROVE BY MAR E�KRUEGER VE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 1-86) AND ZONE WHEREAS, the applicant has requested A Comprehensive Plan Amendment fromand Z ne Change to shift the existing area zoned C--N (Commercial Neighborhood) on the north side of the proposed Murray side of 135th Avenue to a location west of 135th Ave. (WCTM 1S1 33C, T.L. Blvd. extension approximately 500 feet 1000); WHEREAS, the Planning commission reviewed the proposal on February A, 1986 and ondition that the C-N designation not exceed four recommended approval with a c acres in size; and public hearing on a P February 24, 1986 to WHEREAS, g was held befoCity Council consider the Commission recommendation. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: February 4, 1986 Planning staff report to discussed in the Feb is consistent with all relevant criteria as Section 1: The proposal y Planning Commission (Exhibit "A") Council upholds the Planning Commission's recommendation Section 2: The City and Zoning for approval of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as Map Amendment and the comm ercconfigurationial oofwthe fiveill be oacred C-N shown in Exhibit designation may be modified to conform with the final alignment of Murray Blvd. Section 3: The area presently zoned C-N shall be designated R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) . Section 4: That this ordinance shall be effective on and afterthe Ma31st day ra after its passage by the Council, and approval by Y vole of all Council members present after PASSED: By ( Jag !''__ `� this day being read by number and title only, n of !n v n 1986. Loreen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder ^ of � 1986. APPROVED: This _rte Ty _ day - ¢f. J n Cook, Mayor F (KSL:pm50) ` ORDINANCE NO. i Page #� AGI NDA 1 I I.M `�•7 S1 Af F RC NOR1 1-1-BRUARY 4, 1986 V30 30 P.M. 1IGAR[) hIANN[NG COMMISSION y C,MI 1'-R 3UNOW HIGH ';t;Hir)i Iasi 1U865 .W. WALNUT TIGARD. OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1 . General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 1-86 and Zone Change ZC 3-86 the present area designated C-N (Commercial REQUEST: To move Neighborhood) from the. west side of 135th Avenue to a location on the north side of the Murray Road extension, approximately 500 feet west of 135th Avenue. High Density COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION-. Res:ildential/Neighborhood Commercial y ZONING DESIGNATION: R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) and C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) APPLICANT: Russ Krueger OWNER: Marge Krueger 3515 SW Barbur Blvd Rt. 1, Box 792 Suite Y-1 Beaverton, OR 97007 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: Between Scholls Ferry Road and 135th Avenue, approximately one quarter mile north of Walnut Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33C, Tax Lot 1000) . 2. ga round The property was annexed to the City on June 12, 1983 and in August, 1983, the City approved a variety of Plan and Zone designations for the property which included Medium-Nigh Density Residential (R-20), Medium -12) and Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) . In Density Residential (R February, 198A, the City approved the relocation of the C-N area from the west side of 135th Avenue to the northwest corner of the proposed t intersection of the Murray Road extension and 135th Avenue (CPA 18-83/ZC 14-83. In 1985, shift in the location of the C-N zone to the future Murray Road/Scholls Ferry Road intersection was proposed (CPA 4-85IZC 4-85). Because this request was determined to be premature, due to the unanswered questions related to Murray Road extension, the four acre C-N designation was reapplied at the original location on the west side of � 135th A��enue. It was also agreed that once the alignment of Murray Road was datern�ined, the applicant would be entitled to propose yet another x Murray Road location. STAFF RGPORI - CPA 1--86 and ZC 3-86 PAGE 1 ���r i 3. Vicinity Information Except for several scattered homes ites , I.hi, Are,* between 135th Avenue 'And Schal k Ferry Road is und,rv,�Jopoo ano', lir lits I i s nd to a limited extent for agriculture or is wooded the t,.+r _� 1� to the north Are being developed for single family residences (Cotswald Subdivision) . The land surrounding the present and proposed commercial sites is zoned R-25. 4. Site Information The existing and proposed commercial sites are undeveloped. The commercial site is intended to be located on the north side of the Murray Road extension approximately 500 feet west of 135th Avenue. A specific development plan has not been formulated. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Divisi.. has the following comments: a. Site Development Review approval will be required prior to development of the property . b. Sanitary sewerage and storm drainage provisions will be necessary in conjunction with development. C. Participation in the improvement of 135th Avenue and Murray Road will be required as a condition of development. The Building Inspection Office has no objection to the request. The City of Beaverton suggests that the affect this proposal could have upon the future development plans for tax lot 100 to the east be carefully evaluated. No other comments have been received. fi. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1 and 8.1.1 and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria. The Planning staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of Comprehensive Plan basad upon the findings noted below: 1. Plan Policy 2. 1. 1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. 2. Policy 8. 1. 1 is satisfied because the proposed relocation of the C—N zone will allow for the appropriate alignment of the Murray Road extension. `STAFF REPORT — CPA 1=86 and ZC 3-86 PAGE 2 3 . t-ur.:+Li tit saI Criteria a. The site is proposed to be enlaryed Lo l) w<_roy in size rather than the 'L acre guideline yret furl.h in tho Plan A 4 acre size was established when Lhu proporLy w.-A'. •4ItlIC-Xed Lu the City in order to be consistent with the Washington County Plan which applied prior to the annexation. Since this expansion represents a further departure from adopted Plan Policy, the staff recommends that the 4 acre limit be retained. b. There are no other commercial properties within on half mile of the proposed site. C. The commercial site will be limited to the north side of Murray Road. d. No significant traffic impacts are anticipated from this move. Specific traffic related issues will be addressed during the Site Development Review process. e. The site will have direct access to a collector street. f. The eventual development of the commercial center will be evaluated according to the applicable standards in the Community Development Code. Since the entire area is undeveloped, establishing a compatible relationship between uses should not present a problem. Although it is not necessary to consider specific provisions of the C—N r zone, it should be noted that Section 18.60.045 of the code states that "no use shall exceed a gross floor area of 4,000 square feet." A variance must be approved in conjunction with the Site Development Review process in order for this standard to be exceeded. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the findings and conclusions noted above, the Planning staff recommends approval of CPA 1-86 and ZC 3-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. The new C—N zone designation shall be no more than 4 acres in size. PREPARED BY: Keith Liden APPROVED DY: William A. Monahan t Senior Planner Director of Planning & Development (K+1::bs85) STRFF 'REPORT — CPA 1-86.and, ZC 3-96-- PAGC''3 �r s � S o-LES r 40 a 1 ' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86-_L AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.28.130(53), OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PROHIBITING PARKING ON A PORTION OF SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That Section 10.28.130(53) of the Tigard Municipal Code, relating to locations where parking is prohibited at any time, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: "10.28.130 Prohibited at any time. No person shall at any time park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, and whether attended or unattended, within the following defined portions of public streets and highways within the City: (53) Within the southeast half of the most southerly end of SW Main Street, beginning at the intersection of the southeast curb-lines of SW Pacific Highway and SW Main Street and extending seventy five feet along the Main Street curb-line to a point; ( also, therein, beginning at a point on the Main Street curb-line `R- which lies two hundred five feet from said intersecting r; curb-lines and extending thirty feet therealong to a point." Section 2: That the City Administrator be and he is hereby authorized and directed to cause to have the areas in which parking is prohibited as above set forth suitably pasted in the manner provided by law. Section 3: Inasmuch as this parking prohibition is necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public and in particular pedestrians on said street an emergency is recognized to exist and is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage and approval by the City Council. PASSED: By LAhc,-Y�i I+t'Las4-5 vote of all Council members present after being t.-read by number and title only, this tE7�, day of 1986. - :, e een R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This - day of - 1986. Jbhn E. Cook, Mayor ZrH.bs 108 ' ORDIi11RNCE NO 86- Page..1 - .�. C g v p �o. t.I 00poor Ado alcle N 4 Y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ()ROINANCF. NO. 86-_Z_y AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28, 137 TO PROVIDE FOR A DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE ON SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That Section 10.28. 137 of the Tigard Municipal Code, relating to designated loading zones for specified hours of usage, be, and the same is hereby amended and supplemented to add thereto a new subsection reading as follows: "10.28. 137 Loading Zones Designated, the following portions of public streets within the City of Tigard are designated as loading zones for the hours indicated: ( ) Within the southeast half of the most southerly end of SW Main Street beginning at a point on the Main Street curb-line seventy five feet easterly of the intersection of the southeast curb-lines of SW Pacific Highway and SW Main Street, and extending thirty five feet therealong to a point. The described portion of SW Main street is designated as a loading zone between the hours of ten a.m. and six p.m. , Sundays and holidays "'F excluded. Use shall be limited to 30 minute intervals." Section 2: That the City Administrator be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to cause to have the areas in which parking is limited, as above set forth, suitably posted in the manner provided by law. Section 3: Inasmuch as this parking restriction is necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public, an emergency is recognized to exist and is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage and approval by the City Council. f g PASSED: By „�V?li.n imp, .� �� vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 4117 day of f2 1986. , g ALF 1 LoreR. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This �Tj` day of 1986. 4' t o n -E. Cook, Mayor zµ5 JH:bs107 - Y ORDINANCE NO. 86- page 1 o� s v� too- oil r'�eo�sE� t..aWMlew Zo c/E yt z S t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86-J _ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 86-11 RELATING TO OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. -- WHEREAS, the Council desires to clarify and establish that City Officers and Department Heads appointed subsequent to the effective date of this ordinance shall be subject to termination at will without cause; and WHEREAS, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 86-11 on February 17, 1986, establishing City Officers and Department Heads shall be subject to termination at will without cause; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to clarify Ordinance No. 86-11 by setting forth which City Department Head positions are currently considered vacant and must be filled; and WHEREAS, for this ordinance to apply to certain positions that are now vacant, the ordinance must be effective prior to the filling of those vacancies, and the orderly administration of City business requires that those positions be filled as soon as possible, such that an emergency exists: THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 86-11, adopted on February 17, 1986, is hereby amended by adding the following section: "SECTION 12: This ordinance shall apply to all department heads appointed after the effective date of the ordinance, including that individual appointed to fill the currently vacant position of Police Chief." SECTION 2. Effective Date. As this ordinance is to apply to certain positions that are now vacant, the ordinance must be effective prior to the filling of those vacancies, and as the orderly administration of City busir:ess requires that those positions be filled as soon as possible, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By LA h �n Y+i arc vote of all Council members present after being read by number and 'tle only, this �,/7 day of r=o�i v��L� . 1986. n oreen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This day of 1986. s ohn E. Cook, Mayor z t ORDINANCE NO. 86 /S Page I of L lw/3585A } a AGENDA ITEM # _ - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE a' u (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED rias A s 4°. Fs I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please((print the information) Item Description: L� i��'(0 + as— 2a^4e- 2 G :3— C Proponent (For Issue) opponent (Against Issue) fi eeeire�xeee*+R**e*r�rte****wee*,�e*eae*e�e,�* **e*eeeeee******ase*e,a*ear*,�*eee**,u,��t*e**e Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation M KIN t z f s , a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 20, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Zone Change Annexation ZCA 1-86, 108th & Durham PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton REQUESTED BY: Property Owners DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: aasaasaasaasaaaasssaassaaasassaa agesssssaassasasasssasssssasssssassossasmsass POLICY ISSUE aassssmmassaasssssa�aassaasssaassasssassaassaasassasssasassssasssasasssaassassa INFORMATION SUMMARY The applicantsfor this annexation have requested that the public hearing be set over until March 10, 1986 in order to allow the Planning Commission to consider a development proposal on the property at their March 4, 1986 meeting. masmsasssaaasaassssamasamsaasaassasaasssasaaaasasaasasasaasassasasmassssassssssm ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Z, K ,�� � f��samamaaamamamasmasaasaeasamaaaasaamaasaasassasssaaaamasmsassas:saaaamaasassmaa { SUGGESTED ACTION t � Move to continue ZCA l 86 to Jircri7lu 1986 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 2/24/86 AGENDA ITEM #: _ DATE SUBMITTED: 2/20/86 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 1-86/ Approval Recommendation ZC 3-86 Krueger PREPARED BY: Keith Liden REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK• •-�h CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Planning Commission Reviewed a proposal. to move C—N (Commercial Neighborhood) zone designation and to expand its size from 4 to 5 acres. Planning Commission recommends approval of the change with a size limit of 4 acres. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Uphold Planning Commission recommendation. 2. Approve a modified proposal. 3. Deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION Uphold Commission recommendation. (KSL:pm50) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86- IoZ AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 1-86) AND ZONE CHANGE (ZC 3-86) PROPOSED BY MARGE KRUEGER. WHEREAS, the applicant has requested A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change to shift the existing area zoned C-N (Commercial Neighborhood) from the side of 135th Avenue to a location on the north side of the proposed Murray Blvd. extension approximately 500 feet west of 135th Ave. (WCTM SS1 33C, T.L. 1000): WHEREAS, the Planning commission reviewed the proposal on February 4, 1986 and recommended approval with a condition that the C-N designation not exceed four acres in size; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before City Council on February 24, 1986 to consider the Commission recommendation. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The proposal is consistent with all relevant criteria as discussed in the February 4, 1986 Planning staff report to Planning Commission (Exhibit "A"). Section 2: The City Council upholds the Planning m . ion's recommendation for approval of the Compreh tan Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendment and t mercial designation will be located as shown in E "B". The configurata.on of the f acre C-N des' ion may be modified to conform with the final alignment Murray Blvd. Section 3: The area presently zoned C-N shall be designated R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). Section 4: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 1986. Loreen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This day of 1986. John E. Cook, Mayor (KSL:pm50) ORDINANCE NO: 86- f� F.rsTG:.4'�i LAW OFFICES SCHWENN, BRADLEY, BATCHELOR, BRISSEE ANO STOCKTON P. o. Box 567 139 NE LINCOLN W. C.SCHWENN HILLSBORO. OREGON 97123 CARRELL F. BRADLEY TELEPHONE 15031 646-6677 DcMAR L.BATCHELOR TAX 1.D.-93-0517776 LARRY A.BRISBEE WILLIAM H. STOCKTON December 30, 1985 Mr. William A. Monahan Director, Community Development City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Tigard Solid Waste Management Ordinance Dear Mr. Monahan: Thank you for your letter of December 20, 1985, with a copy of Ordinance 78-64 enclosed. We have agreed to assist Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. , in securing the consent and approval of the City Council to a transfer of the franchise granted by Ordinance 78-64 and any amendments thereto. Mr. Lee Kell, an attorney in Portland, will be assisting Lorry Leichner, an individual, the proposed franchise transferee. Mr. Kell and I would like to meet with you or other members of the City Staff who you would consider appropriate regarding the process for transfer. Mr. Kell and I will have a packet of information regarding the proposed transferee for our meeting with you. We will call your office to arrange a time which is convenient for you for such a meeting. Lastly, pursuant to Section 9 of Ordinance 78-64, will you please consider this letter as the franchisee's written Notice of Intent to Transfer. If you need further documentation at this time prior to our meeting with you, please let me know. Thank you. You rs ver truly, �z � f DLB:eis cc: Mr. R. J. Edwards Mr. Lee Kell Mr. Art Miles MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the Utility and Franchise. Committee February 6, 1986 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development Department SUBJECT: Transfer of Ownership - Frank' s Disposal Service Frank's Disposal Service has applied to transfer, to Lorry and Iva Leichner, ownership of it's franchise in accordance with Ordinance No. 78-•-64, the existing franchise agreement, effective through December, 1988. The applicable portions of the agreement are Section 9, Transfer , Suspension, Modification or Revocation of Franchise; and Section 7, Franchise Responsibility (copies attached). The applicant has complied with Section 9 by submitting a letter dated December 30, 1985 and received by the City of Tigard on January 2. 1986, which ult of this notice, the City has been presented to the City Recorder. As a res Council will consider the transfer on February ?.4, 1986. The language e Section 9 specifies that the Council must give written approval if the transferee, Leichner, meets all applicable requirements met by the original Franchises. I have examined Section 7 of the Franchise Agreement and compared it to a January 27, 1986 letter submitted by Attorney Lee Davis Kell. Attorney Kell's tion to convince me that the Leichner's letter provides satisfactory documenta are ready and qualified to assume all of the obligations of Frank' s Disposal Service. The specific provisions of Section 7 will be met by: "(1) The Franchiseees shall: (a) Resource recover or dispose of wastes collected at sites approved by the City that are in compliance with Chapter 459, Oregon Revised Statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder." The Letter of January 27, 1986 describes the experience of the Leichner family business and Lorry Leichner in particular. This experience shows ability to comply with 1(a): " (b) _Provide and keep in force public liability insurance with a 30 day cancellation of not less than $100,000 for clause in the amoun injury to a single person, $300,000 to a group of persons and $50,000 relating to a single occurrence, which shall be property damage, all evidencpO by a certificate of insurance filed with the City Recorder. Y The insurance shall indemnify and save a City harmless against liability or damage which may arise or occur from an injury to persons or- property resulting from the Franchisee's operation under this Ordinance." Page 3 of the January 27 letter refers to a letter of commitment from Adams - Thompson Insurance Agency which indicates the willingness of the Agency to provide the liability insurance needed. A certificate of insurance meeting the requirements of 1(b) must be filed with the City Recorder upon transfer of ownership, before assumption of responsibility by the Leichners. of (c) Within 30 days after the effective date of this Ordinance, File with the City Recorder a written acceptance of the franchise." This requirement has been met by Frank's, the Council' s approval of the transfer to the Leichner's will place the new owner in Frank's position. to (d) Furnish sufficient collection vehicles, containers, facilities, personnel, finances, and scheduled days for collections in each area of the City necessary to provide all types of service required under this Ordinance or subcontract with others to provide such service pursuant to this Ordinance." Page 2 of the January 27 letter outlines the Leichner's commitment to continue using the same equipment as now used by Franks. The applicant will, however, upgrade the equipment and make some management changes. No reduction in equipment, labor force, or collection schedule will occur. On pages 3 and 4 of the letter, the applicant indicates a commitment to modifications to improve efficiency of service by, among other things, utilizing satellite trucks. The financial capability of the Leichner's is indicated on page 3 under the section entitled Demonstration of Financial Reponsibility. A reading of the information provided shows sufficient commitment to meet the requirements of 1(d). " (e) Provide a cash security deposit or a performance bond in the amount of $5,000 to guarantee payment to the City or other affected person of a judgment secured against the Franchise holder because of work performed that does not conform with the requirements of this Ordinance or other Ordinances of the City. The deposit or bond shall continue until one year after expiration of the franchise or until all claims or demands made against the Franchisee have been settled or secured." This provision must be met at the time of initiating service. The bond commitment as outlined by Adams-Thompson Insurance Agency should suffice to indicate that this will be complied with. (f) Collect no single family residential solid waste before 5:00 A.M. or after 7:00 F .M. unless this condition is waived by the City ('� Administrator or his designee." Page three refers to the Collection Schedule for the Franchised Area. Any modification to the schedule must comply with the time restrictions outlined in 1(f). " (h) Make collections no less often than once each week, except for will—call collections and drop box operations, and except as provided in Section 1.1 ." Again, on page 3 of the January 27 letter, the applicant has committed to improving the efficiency of service. This may not result in collection on less than a once per week basis . (i) Permit inspection by the City of the Franchisee' s facilities, equipment and personnel at reasonable times." Acceptance of the Franchise Agrvoment by the L eichner's will preserve the City's inspection rights. is (j) Respond to all calls for special. hauling requiring equipment regularly supplied by Franchiser within 96 hours of receiving said call unless a letter pickup is agreeable to the customer. SF,14ial hauling of containers or drop boxes supplied by Franchisee is dependent upon availability of those containers or boxes." Page A of the January 27 letter describes the administration services and customer relation services to be provided. Item 1(j) must remain intact as a condition of the agreement. The applicant has not requested a deviation from this standard. 4 "(2) A franchisee may require a contract from a customer who requires an unusual service involving added or specialized equipment solely to provide that service. The purpose of this subsection is to prevent the added cost from being assessed against other ratepayers if the customer later withdraws From service." This special arrangement provision requires that ratepayers not assume the added expense of providing service to those customers with special needs. No deviation from this provision has been requested. The applicant has further committed to introducing a weekly recycling feature similar to that now underway in Wilsonvillq. Explanation of this feature should provide some assistance to the Committee as it prepares the City's program. I suggest that the Committee forward a recommendation to the City Council stating that a review of the application for transfer of the solid waste franchise of Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. be to Lorry L. Leichner and Iva L. Leichner, finds that the request is in order and should be approved by the City Council. If the Committee has any conditions which it would like the Council to consider adding to Leichner's application, the Committee should include those with the recommendation. Should the Committee wish to do this, the conditions must relate to guaranteeing maintenance of service and compliance with Ordinance No. 78--64. (WAM:br/2345P) KELI.,ALTEEMAN 8c RUNSTEIN ATTORNEYS AT LAW SMITE 1330-THE BANK OF CAUFOi7N1A 707 S.W.WASHINGTON STREET .ANL ALDRESS •LLM l RAYMOND M,KELT CLIFFORD B.ALTS Rid.: , POa'�TLAN D,OgEGON 97205-35`2 TED E.RUNSTEiN TELEPHONE 1503,22Z-3531 LEE DAVIS KELL DANA L.BARNES LISA C.BROWN GARY P.COMPA WILLIAM DICKAS MARY ELLEN PA FARR January 27, 1986 MARGARET M.LEEK LEIS ER-N DENNIS A.OLSON WAYNE G.PALMER ERIC SOGGE Mr. William A. Monahan Director, Community Development City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Application for Transfer of Solid Waste Collection Franchise Our File No. 1406-34-3 Dear Sir: In connection for the application for the transfer of the solid waste franchise Frank' s Disposal Service, Inc. to Lorry L. Leichner and Iva L. Leichner, we are enclosing the following information regarding Mr. and Mrs. Leichner. Enclosed is a memorandum regarding the purchase transaction and the ability of Mr. and Mrs. Leichner to provide collection service. Attached to the memorandum are the following references: 1. Bank reference from 1st Independent Bank, Vancouver, Washington. 2. Character reference from Mr. A. Greg Henderson. 3. Character reference from Mr. Art Miles, CPA. 4. Insurance commitment from Adams-Thompson Agency. Please feel free to address any questions either personally or in writing to Mr. Lorry L. Leichner, P.O. Box 343, Battleground, Washington 98604, telephone number (206) 687-2298 or 1-765-2914. We appreciate your consideration. Very truly yours, 1 . Lee Davis Kell LDK:dsw/105:04 Enc. M E M O TO: City of Tigard FROM: Lorry L. Leichner and Iva L. Leichner SUBJECT: Application for Transfer of Solid Waste Collection Franchise File No. 1405-34-3 DATE: January 27, 1986 PURPOSE This memorandum is to provide background information about Lorry and Iva Leichner as part of their application for transfer of the City of Tigard solid waste collection franchise from Frank' s Disposal Service, Inc. The Leichners are parties to an Agreement dated October 1, 1985 to purchase the assets of Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. This Agreement will be effective when the various jurisdictions served by Frank' s Disposal Service, including the City of Tigard, approve a transfer of their respective solid waste collection franchises. The Agreement calls for the sale of the trucks, containers and equipment owned by Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. , and the accounts receivable as of the effective date. Lorry L. Leichner and Iva L. Leichner are also purchasing the portions of Frank's Disposal Service solid waste collection business in Washington County and the Cities of Sherwood and King City. United Disposal Service, Inc. , based in Woodburn, is purchasing that portion of Frank's Disposal Service serving the City of Tualatin. HISTORY AND EXPERIENCE Lorry Leichner has demonstrated the ability to own and operate significant collection and disposal companies. He has extensive experience of over twenty-five years in the greater Portland area in operating both collection companies and landfill sites. The Leichner family has a long tradition in the garbage collection and disposal business. Beginning in the 1920' s Lorry Leichner's father, Philip, began operations in the collection of garbage in the City of Portland. In the 19301.s, Philip Leichner moved his operation to the Oregon �Y:. Memo--City of Tigard Page 2 January 27, 1986 City area, where with Richard Bloom, they operated a garbage collection company. In 1937 Philip Leichner purchased a collection business in Vancouver, Washington. Beginning in 1941 he obtained the exclusive contract for the City of Vancouver, Washington and the family enterprises operated the city franchise from 1941 through 1958. In 1958, another disposal company contracted with the City of Vancouver to provide the collection activity. However, in 1963 the City of Vancouver asked the Leichners to again take over the city contract and the Leichner family enterprises have operated the City of Vancouver contract from 1963 to the present time. In addition to the City of Vancouver, the Leichner family became involved in the greater Clark County area of refuse collection by obtaining the Vancouver Sanitary permit in 1937, the Twin City (Camas-Washougal) permit in 1960 and the Buchmann permit (North Clark County) in 1973. The Leichner family has also operated the landfill site for Clark County since 1939. Lorry Leichner managed all of the Leichner family enterprises in Clark County from 1961 to 1983. In 1983, by mutual agreement Lorry Leichner sold his interest in the Clark County operations to his brother Elmer Leichner. In addition to being the managing partner of the Clark County operations for the Leichner family, Lorry Leichner also was a part owner in other Leichner family garbage - disposal businesses in Boulder and Greely, Colorado and Hood River, Oregon. CAPACITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE Lorry Leichner possesses both the financial resources . and experience to operate Frank' s Disposal in Washington County. All of the present equipment operated by Frank' s Disposal will be utilized in the collection process. In addition, Mr. Leichner would in the near future begin to upgrade the equipment to more modern and efficient systems. There are no plans to reduce the number of pieces of equipment being utilized nor the labor force employed to provide the service. Although the present general manager would no longer be involved with the business, Mr. Leichner uld be and his sons Mike Leichner and David Leichner wo { t . < Memo--City of Tigard Page 3 January 27, 1986 directly involved in the business. Mike Leichner has over nine years experience and David Leichner has over seven years experience in this area. DEMONSTRATION OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Mr. Leichner has a net worth in excess of $2,000,000. The significance of this net worth is that a large portion of the net worth is in cash or cash related equities such as bonds. This financial position allows Mr. Leichner to provide the necessary depth of resources to continue the operation as necessary. In addition to his personal net worth, Mr. Leichner has made preliminary arrangements with 1st Independent Bank of Vancouver, Washington for a line of credit. Mr. J. Clifford Ourso, executive vice-president of the bank is very familiar with Mr. Leichner's financial position an& would be happy to provide any banking reference, in addition to his attached letter. Mr. Ourso can be contacted at (206) 699-4391. RECOMMENDATION FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS Lorry Leichner was the principal party involved with the City of Vancouver contracts from 1961 through 1983. Mr. Kent Shorthill or John Ostrowski, the department head for the Department of Public Works, can be contacted regarding the performance of Mr. Leichner in the City of Vancouver contract (telephone numbers--John Ostrowski, 206-696-8187 and Kent Shorthill, 206-696-8161) . The City of Vancouver contract consists of approximately fifteen thousand customers with a total annual revenue in excess of $3,500,000. 00. CHARACTER REFERENCES As part of this submission, character references from Greg Henderson and Art Miles, CPA, are attached. Greg Henderson operates an independent insurance agency in Vancouver, Washington. Art Miles is the managing partner of Moss Adams CPAs, a regional public accounting firm with 17 offices on the West Coast. BOND COMMMITMENT/LIABILITY COVERAGE A letter of commitment from Adams-Thompson Insurance Agency is attached. COLLECTION SCHEDULE FOR THE FRANCHISED AREA Initially, the collection service in Tigard will i= remain on the same schedule. There will be some modifications to improve the efficiency of the service, >6 Memo--City of Tigard Page 4 January 27, 1986 , including the use of satellite trucks in appropriate localities. This will enable the collector to minimize the use of large equipment where possible. CUSTOMER RELATIONS Lorry Leichner will provide as part of the administrative services of Frank's Disposal the following customer relation services: 1. A fully staffed office of a minimum of two full time individuals to receive any incoming calls or receive directly any personal complaints regarding service. 2. Lorry Leichner and Mike Leichner will be available to also assist any customers regarding their specific concerns. Both Lorry Leichner and Mike Leichner will be spending full time in the operation orienting themselves to the various service areas and meeting, with the necessary officials to allow for the most efficient transfer of service. 3. The office hours will be eight to five weekdays. p 4. The operational facility will be conveniently located to provide easier access than presently provided. RECYCLING A new feature will be the introduction of a weekly recycling service. This includes specialized collection equipment providing recycling service to every resident on the same day as the garbage collection service. 113:09 t, . SIT pendent 19ank _ HEAD OFFICE 1313 Mein Street P.O.Boa C-OO4 VANCOUVER.WASHINGTON 98669 To Whom It May Concern: Mr, Lorry Leichner has been a very valued customer of First Independent Bank since 1973. He has always conducted his business affairs with the Bank in a very A it professional and satisfactory manner. Sincerel , � f J.. if r urso Vice President r JCO:ms M �z BRANCHES THROTSGFHOLTT SC)X7TXT,%ArEL3T W'ASITYNC?TC7N Henson&Associates ks xww and 8eru r Dir January 17, 1986 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This letter is intended as a personal recommendation to all interested parties as to the general character and business sense of Mr. Lorry L. Leichner. My office has worked for Mr. Leichner in varying capacities personally and corporately as the past presidentof Clark County Disposal, Inc. and its related industries. I have known Mr. Leichner since 1977 and have always found his integrity and business dealings to be honest and straight forward. His past company's success and operation can most certainly be attributed to his most able management and selection of employees and related business matters. We have had numerous opportunities to work with Mr. Leichner on his personal and business matters and have found him to be fair minded and prudent. Mr. Leichner's word often times has been the sole reliance for us to operate under on some of our business matters. I cannot recall a situation wherein we had to question his intent or had occasion for him to go back on his word. I would be more than happy to amplify any of this on Mr. Leichner's approval . Respectfully yours, 77 A. GREG H ENDERSON, CLU K • AGi:slh 703 Broadway.Suite 506,Vancouver Washington 98660 v^ene (206)695-0798 MOSS AD S 100 Fust Federal Plaza 1220 Main Street CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Vancouver,Washington 98660-2993 Phone.(206,693-3653 Portland-.(503)228-7929 Offices in PT nclpal Cities of Washington,Oregon and California February ?2 , 1986 Internationally,Moores Rowland Intl. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, This letter will serve as a personal character reference for Lorry Leichner. Moss Adams has been associated with Mr. Leichner since 1973. Our association has involved working with Mr. Leichner in his financial affairs, particularly related to the garbage collection and disposal business. We have also worked closely with Mr. Leichner and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission and the cities of Vancouver and Washougal. These relationships with the various jurisdictional entities have given us an opportunity to witness Mr. Leichner' s personal int-agrity and sound and fair business actions. Mr. Leichner has demonstrated the ability to successfully run garbage collection businesse3 with total volumes in excess of $7 ,000 ,000. In addition, he has also been directly responsible for the operation of the designated sanitary landfill site for Clark County, Washington. Mr. Leichner has operated in these capacities for approximately the last twenty years. Mr. Leichner' s personal integrity is highly regarded by our firm and the community within which he operates. He has demonstrated the highest level of integrity of always being a man of his word and to work very effectively with city , county and state jurisdictional bodies. I can personally affirm Mr. Leichner's excellent reputation which he has earned in the garbage collection and disposal business in > . the state of Washington. I am sure he will apply the same principles to his endeavors in other jurisdictional areas. Very truly yours, Art Miles Managing Partner - l h r <-b ADAMS—TI- OMP'SON ACAF— ICY INSURANCE BONDS 7409 NORTH EAST HAZEL DELL AVENUE VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON 98665 PHONE: 694-2515 a , January 20, 1986 To Whom it May Concern We are the insurance agent for Lorry Leichner, who we understand is negotiating for the purchase of Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. We are prepared to have liability insurance bound as soon as this sale takes place. In addition, we will also issue the necessary license bonds for the cities of Tigard & Sherwood, Or. Sincerely, �dwar - Thompson EMT:ra :JTIAi CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24th, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 6th, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Ord. #83-46 enacted ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW Main Street on Oct. 10th 1983 — No Parking Zone (amendment)L PREPARED BY: John Hagman Ordinance REQUESTED BY: Community Dev. Dept. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Please refer to the attached map which illustrates the site. 2. Should the Council act to create a loading zone at the south end of Main Street, as is proposed via a separate agenda item, then the attached ordinance need also be passed to amend (existing no parking zone) verbiage within the Municipal Code which would conflict therewith. 3. The attached ordinance is subsequently, no more than a "housekeeping measure". ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION PASS THE ORDINANCE (IF THE LOADING ZONE PROPOSAL IS PASSED) TITLED: "An h, Ordinance Amending Section 10.28.130 (53), of the Tigard Municipal Code, k. Relating to Prohibiting Parking on a Portion of SW Main Street, Declaring an Emergency and Fixing an Effective Date." r` 3H:bs108 CITY OF TTnARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA TF-M SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24th, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 6th, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW Main Street — Loading Zone (creation) PREPARED BY: John Hagman Ordinance REQUESTED BY: Citizen & Police Dept. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: 446mi 4- - - - CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Please refer to the attached map which illustrates the site. 2. The Community Development Department received a request, which was originally directed to the Police Department by Mr. Mike McKinley (who owns the plant store), for creation of a Loading Zone at the south end of SW Main Street. 3. Mr. McKinley's problem is that he has a need to unload & load supplies to conduct business but lacks a practical (legal) place to do so. 4. Subsequently, after discussing the problem with Mr. McKinley and Lt. Jennings, and after inspection of the site, it has been determined that the attached ordinance proposal will satisfactorily resolve all concerns. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED �. SUGGES i D ACTION PASS THE ORDINANCE TITLED: "An Ordinance Amending and Supplementing Chapter 10.28 of the Tigard Municipal Code by Adding to Section 10.29.137 to Provide for a Designate Loading Zone on SW Main Street, Declaring an Emergency and Fixing an Effective Date." JH:bs107 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 6 AGENDA OF: February 24, 1986 AGENDA ITEM M: DATE SUBMITTED: February 19, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Adopted Ordinance On ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Officers/ 2/17/86 DeR.Irtment Head Ordinance Revision PREPARED BY: Chuck Corrigan REQUESTED BY: Tim Ramis, Attorney DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council set policy of 'at will' doctrine being established for all officers and department heads by adoption of Ordinance No. 86-11 on 2/17/86. INFORMATION SUMMARY Legal Counsel recommended, at the 2/17/86 meeting, that Council consider an amendment to Ordinance No. 86-11, which set the at will' doctrine for officers and department heads of the City. The attached ordinance sets for the amendment suggested by Legal Counsel which would further define those positions which are currently considered vacant and would immediately come under the at will' doctrine. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the ordinance as submitted. 2. Amend the ordinance. 3. Consider ordinance at later date. SUGGESTED ACTION rApprove the ordinance as submitted. 3585A A METROPOL I TAN AREA_.COMMUN I CAT I.ONNS_COMMISSION' MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 15, 198E The regular meeting of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission was called to order by Connie Fessler, Vice Chair (in the absence of the Chair) in the Community Roam of the Beaverton City Library at 12500 SW Allen Boulevard, Beaverton, Oregon at 1:45 pm on Wednesday, January 15, 1986. ROLL CALL: Jeanne Percy, Durham; Connie Fessler, Forest Grove; Tim Erwert, Hillsboro; Denis Borman, King City; Daniel Scheans, Rivergrove; Joy Martin, Tigard; Richard Devlin, Tualatin; Eve Killpack, Washington County; Kirk Flanders, Washington County; and William Tierney, MACC Administrator. Mike Dowsett, Beaverton; Bob Jean, Tigard, and Jim Rapp, Sherwood; arrived after Election of Officers. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Ms. Fessler opened nominations for officers for 1986. Mr. Erwert nominated Eve Killpack for the position of Chairman. Mr. Scheans seconded the nomination. No other nominations were made and Ms. Killpack was elected unanimously with 8 aye votes and no abstentions. Mr. Erwert nominated Bob Jean for the position of Vice Chairman. Mr. Borman seconded the nomination. No other nominations were made and Mr. Jean was elected unanimously with a aye votes and no abstentions. Mr. Erwert nominated Herb Hirst for the position of Secretary/Treasurer. Ms. Killpack seconded the nomination. No other nominations were made and Mr. Jean was elected unanimously with a aye votes and no abstentions. Ms. Killpack accepted her position as Chair. INTRODUCTIONS: Chair Killpack noted that Mr. Pete Wall, the new alternate representatives for the City of Wilsonville, was unable to attend todays meeting. She introduced Mr. Richard Devlin, the new representative from the City of Tualatin, and noted that Mr. Robert Haas is now their alternate representative. APPROVAL OF MINUTESt Ms. Fessler moved for approval of the meeting minutes from the December 18, 1985 regular meeting of the Commission; Mr. Borman second the motion. Motion carried unanimously with 10 aye votes and no abstentions. VISITORS: There were novisitors present _ who wished to address the Commission at this time. MACC MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 15, 1986 r CONSTRUCTION AND CABLE OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE REPORT: Decer:►ber___"Report._ Mr. Tierney rioted the handout this date of the December 1985 report. He outlined the report noting the small number (48) of multliple dwelling units under construction due to Storer Metro' s year end. There are 33, 692 subscribers and 38,446 premium subscribers. 83. 0% of service calls were responded to within 24 hours. Mr. Tierney noted the letter from Mr. Dan Murrell, Vice President of Operations of Storer Metro, addressing service call statistics for the previous two months in response to discussion at the last meeting questioning why the service call threshold was not being met. Mr. Murrell' s letter explains that weekend calls for service are now logged when they are received, but may not be responded to until Monday; customer rescheduling and "not homes" are no longer cancelled and remain open; many days of bad weather in November extended the time for service call response; and 4. 5% of calls were voluntary rescheduled by customer. Mr. Tierney stated that 12% of the service calls were not responded to within 24 hours in December and that the Commission needs to determine if Storer' s reasons are valid. MACC staff has not been receiving complaints regarding lack of 24 hour service and staff recommends to allow time for Storer Metro to improve accuracy of reporting before considering penalties. Mr. Tierney stated that telephone answering has improved and Storer Metro is now meeting the requirements. RFI will be completing technical tests on the Lake Oswego system in the near future. FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATIONS �QnEidgr�t�on_of_Changem_tQ_Apcegs_Faci l. t leg;,_.great gn_c�f_Mini_Mobi 1_g � g} _QrQaacfiQn_Uni - Mr. Tierney brought attention to MACC' s December 5 letter to Storer Metro included in the packet, and the Agreement and Proposal Summary which were distributed at the meeting, regarding the creation of a mini-mobile electronic field production unit. He outlined the Agreement, notifying the Board that this unit would be created primarily from the equipment currently at the PCC-Rock Creek Studio. The reasons for the proposal are noted in the Summary, and includes the present Studio gets very little use and MACC' s government access productions are on the increase therefore MACC would better utilize this equipment relieving the heavy use on the Storer Metro vans and editing equipment, thus making them available to access users. He also outlined the costs involved as detailed in the Summary. Storer Metro would provide MACC with a vehicle with clear title, with an operational expense to MACC of 41,450 annually; Storer Metro would p- - for the cost of reconfiguration of the equipment at approximately $3,000; and incidental expenses for operation and maintenance of the EFP system would cost MACC approximately 41,000 annually. Mr. Tierney explained the fifteen conditions of the Agreement as detailed in the handout, informing the Board that this would create a ci:ange to the current Franchise Agreement i.e. Storer Metro would no longer have an obligation to provide the third production van. PCC-Rock Creek will still have priority use upon request for the EFP system, thereby not eliminating the means for productions at the PCC-Rock Creek Studio. -r- MACC MEETLNG MINUTES JANUARY 15, 1986 Mr. Dowsett asked if MACC would retain the vehicle given to MACC by Storer Metro if the Agreement was terminated. Mr. Tierney stated that MACC would own the vehicle. Mr. Erwert asked who will be responsible for replacement of the vehicle. Mr. Tierney replied that MACC would be obligated to replace the vehicle, but Storer would be obligated for replacement of the third van if it was purchased, and added that MACC may trade this vehicle and their current vehicle for one MACC vehicle. Ms. Fessler questioned the current need for the third production van and the difference between it and the mini-mobile. Mr. Tierney explained that the Van is for productions which can be taped near the van (outdoors, etc. ) and today there is no need shown for the third van. The mini-mobile would allow for indoor productions, such as the County Commission meetings which are held on the fourth floor. Mr. Jean stated his concern regarding waiving a future $100,000 franchise requirement and Storer Metro' s obligation on the replacement of other access equipment; it seems that Storer Metro is offering a si30,000 deal and we are offsetting a $100, 000 commitment. Mr. Tierney stated that MACC is not waiving any obligation of Storer Metro to keep access equipment operable and the Franchise Agreement states Storer has to provide the third van "when needed. " Mr. Jean agreed that the Agreement is therefore a probable equivalent. Mr. Dowsett stated he felt maybe the third van requirement should be reinstated if the mini-mobile equipment is returned to PCC at a later date and that he does not want to lose the obligation for the fifth studio. Mr. Murrell replied that MACC controls whether or not PCC has the access equipment and the power to terminate that agreement, and the fifth studio would not be lost, Just on wheels. Mr. Scheans commerteb that the mini-mobile is better than a studio because it Is moveable, were&% the limited use of the studios and heavy use of port-a-paks indicate the preference for the mobile equipment, 'and the mini-mobile can still be used at the PCC-Rock Creek Studio. Mr. Jean stated he was happy with the staff proposal; good tradeoff now considering unforeseen need for third van in the future. Mr. Jean moved to approve the MACC/Storer Metro Agreement Concerning the Construction and Operation of the Mini-Mobile Electronic Field Production Unit as recommended by staff and Storer Metro; Mr. Dowsett seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously with le aye votes and no abstentions. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: lSlI��BC__EY2lL�E,$!�__RIPSIC� - Mr. Tierney noted the distribution of the report at the meeting and allowed time for review. Ms. Fessler moved for approval; Mr. Scheans seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously t with 10 aye votes and no abstentions. MACC MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 15, 1986 C Access Committee_-__Adaption_of_MACC_Access_Committee_Bylaws_by_Poard Motion - Mr. Tierney introduced Rod Hevland, Access Committee Bylaws Subcommittee member. Mr. Hevland outlined the Bylaws as distributed to the Commission this date as amended (previous Bylaws were distributed the week prior to the meeting). He pointed out an important aspect of the Bylaws which would allow the Committee to select their own Chair (the Commission previously agreed the Board representative would automatically be the Chair), noting that the Access Committee is an advisory committee to the Commission and all major actions go before the Commission for their consideration and approval. Mr. Jean emphasized that the Committee is an advisory committee and the Committee needs to understand their accountability to the Board. Mr. Hevland replied that the Commission does appoint the Committee members and the Committee feels they are better able to choose their chair to guide the Committee to serve their purpose. Ms. Fessler moved to approve the Bylaws of the MACC Access Committee as presented by the Committee; Mr. Borman seconded the motion; motion carried unanimously with 10 aye votes and no abstentions. Q�PPtig1_+__St1_@SEess_�rpint��Awalr�s/Aubl�,city_program_Budget_by_SQ�rd_�,.notian Mr. Tierney noted the inclusion in the packet of the proposed budget for the Program from January 1 - June 30, 1986- He stated the Access Committee has the authority to spend $6,000 annually and the budget divides the expenditures by 1) Grants to Producers - $3,200; 2) Annual Competition - $200; 3) Access Workshops - $700; 4) Access Publicity - $1,200; 5) Exemplary Programs - $320; 6) Supplemental Equipment - $674. 15; and 7) Viewership Survey - $100. He explained that $3,000 revenue from Storer Metro is budgeted and $3,394. 15 is carried over from 1985. Mr. Erwert moved to approve the proposed budget as presented; Me. Fessler seconded the motion; motion carried unanimously with 10 ayes and no abstentions. Bor2natioB__grJ__Hgarg_Ae_tr�eat - Chair Kilipack noted the inclusion in the packet of the agenda for the MACC Annual Retreat to be held on Wednesday, January 29, 1986 at the Jenkins Estate. Mr. Tierney informed the Board that Mary Himmel will act as facilitator for the Goals and Marc Pease, Program Manager, City of Tacoma, will be the dinner speaker. -4- MACC MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 15, 1986 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS Mr. Tierney outlined the status of three ongoing demonstration projects on the PCNs I. Oregon Graduate Center, Video Projects Operational since 1/b/66. Very successful. Hope to demonstrate to MACC Board by doing a Commission meeting on the two-way video system. 2. Unified Sewerage Agencys Two projects - high speed data link and telemetry. Both working fine. 3. Reedville School District : Planned to be working by mid-February. There being no further business, the Commission adjourned at 2s47 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Eve Killpack Chair zt EK/(TMM)/tmm Recording Secretary T. McIntosh # Meeting recorded by audiotape and videotape recordings. tl i� ME'I R0P0L,ITAN AREA C® CA'PIONS COr41%MS SIGN 12655 S.W. Center Street a Suite 390•Beaverton, OR 97005-1601 •(503) 641-0218 February 11, 1986 TO: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FROM: WILLIAM J. TIERNEY, ADMINISTRATOR RE: 1986 GOALS Enclosed is a report on MACC's goals for 1986 based upon discussions at the Retreat of January 29, 1986. The report has two sections. The first section is a listing of the goals as proposed at the Retreat. The language is exactly what was written at the meeting by the facilitator. The second part is the work plan developed by staff and presented for your consideration. Each goal, with the exception of the last two listed at the Retreat, is incorporated into the work plan either as a goal or an objective. Since some of the "goals" discussed at the Retreat were similar they were grouped together (as objectives) under a more general goal. WJT/tmm Enclosure METROPOLITAN_AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION GOALS - 1986 Elements of Goals as identified by Mary Himmel, January 29, 1986: * Control +� Change * Attainability e Tangibility UQA6g_lRgNTIEIEQ_61_SQAR©_RETREAT (Number preceding goal indicates the number of "blue dots" given to prioritize the goals by the Commissioners. ) (30) CONSUMER PROTECTION: INCREASE THE ENFORCEMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION STANDARDS BY ENFORCING PROVISIONS OF THE FRANCHISE. (18) DEVELOP PROGRAMS USING VIDEOTAPE TO INFORM AND EDUCATE THE PUBLIC AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS ON THE ROLE, AUTHORITY AND ACTIVITIES OF MACC, PUBLIC ACCESS AND PCN. (18) SCHOOLSt PROVIDE INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS TO INTEGRATE PUBLIC ACCESS INTO THEIR CURRICULA. (17) COMMUNICATIONt PUBLISH A MACC NEWSLETTER AND DISTRIBUTE TO MEMBER JURISDICTIONS AND THE MEDIA. (16) DEVELOP A 3-5 YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN ON REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES WHICH STAYS WITHIN THE 2% FRANCHISE FEE PLUS OTHER REVENUES. (14) ORGANIZE A COORDINATED STRATEGY FOR INTERCONNECTION OF SYSTEMS TO INCLUDE PCN AND ACCESS. (12) DEVELOP A BROCHURE FOR DISTRIBUTION TO POTENTIAL AND EXISTING SUBSCRIBERS DESCRIBING MACC AND ITS ROLE. (11) INCREASE AND TECHNICALLY IMPROVE CABLE ACCESS PROGRAMMING. (10) INSTITUTE A PROGRAM TO INCREASE THE USE OF PCN AND ESTABLISH EVALUATION CRITERIA. (10) DEVELOP AND PRESENT TO STORER ALTERNATIVES TO ALLOW THE PRESERVATION OF UNIVERSAL SERVICE. (6) EXPLORE OTHER POSSIBLE COOPERATIVE VENTURES/PROGRAMS WITH NEIGHBOR` (2) DIRECT THE ACCESS COMMITTEE TO IDENTIFY PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY. MACC_GOALS_�}ORKPLAt�_l985: 5081..1 �NCREA��_TH�_�NFO�Q� I �dj_QF_�QN �IMFR FaRQT�QT�OI�_ TANFA�Q3_�Y �P`iFORC�,N¢_QRQV I��,QNS_QF_�Rf1NQF1I 8E_�OR€FM�NT_ OBJECTIVE: MONITOR CABLE OPERATIONS AND PERFORMANCE IN CONSUMER PROTECTION AREAS; REPORT PERFORMANCE TO BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. Workplan: 1. Receive data from Storer Metro. Monthly (telephone answering, service request response, technical quality, and 60--day installation requirement. ) 2. Prepare Compliance Report. Monthly 3. Submit Compliance Report to Board for Monthly consideration. 4. Follow-up on Compliance Report to investigate As Needed problem areas; report to Board. 5. Hoard acts on Compliance Report to accept Monthly compliance, warn Storer Metro about lack of compliance or penalize according to Section 8.7 (as amended) . S. Engage an independent contractor to perform At Least Twice technical test on RSN. A Year MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 OBJECTIVE: MONITOR DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SUBDIVISIONS IN THE FRANCHISE AREA TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FRANCHISE REQUIREMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND ACTIVATION OF CABLE PLANT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF WHEN 50% OF SUBDIVISIONS$ BUILDING PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED. Work Plan: 1. Request member Jurisdictions to notify November 1985 Storer Metro and MACC of approval of new subdivisions. 2. Develop computerized data base. March 1986 3. Develop system to collect information on regular March 1966 basis from member Jurisdictions. (Subdivision information/buildins permits) 4. Collect data from member Jurisdictions. Monthly, Bi-monthly or Quarterly 5. Update computerized data base; share information Monthly, with Storer Metro. Bi-monthly or(,_ Quarterly 6. Notify Storer Metro by letter, of subdivisions As Needed reaching 50% building permit threshold and beginning of sixty day requirement. 7. Notify subdivision residents of requirement As Needed to construct cable plant. 8. Monitor construction and compliance with As Needed construction requirement. 9. Notify Board of status; Board considers As Needed penalties for noncompliance. Related Activities: 1. Complaint Resolution 2. Customer Service Attitude Survey MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 C WAL:. INCREASE_AND_IMPROVE_COMMUNICATION_WITH MEMBER JURISDICTIONS AND-PUBLIC OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP PROGRAMS USING VIDEOTAPE TO INFORM AND EDUCATE THE PUBLIC AND MEMBER JURISD!C-TIONS ON THE ROLE, AUTHORITY AND ACTIVITIES OF MACC. Work Plan: 1. Prepare development plan addressing format, By May 1986 frequency, subjects, distribution and cost. 2. Board consider and approve plan. May 1986 3. Produce first video program. By July 1986. 4. Distribute first video program. August 1986. S. Produce and distribute subsequent video Frequency programs. Determined By #1 and Oil OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP MACC NEWSLETTER FOR DISTRIBTUION TO MEMBER JURISDICTIONS AND THE MEDIA. Work Plan= 1. Prepare development plan addressing format, By May 1986 frequency, subjects and costs. 2. Board consider and approve plan. May 1986 3. Prepare first newsletter and distribute. By August 1986. 4. Prepare and distribute subsequent newsletters. Frequency Determined By #1 and #2 -4- MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP A BROCHURE FOR DISTRIBUTION TO POTENTIAL AND EXISTING SUBSCRIBERS DESCRIBING MACC AND ITS ROLE Work Plans 1. Prepare a development plan addressing format, By December distribution means and costs. 1986. 2. Board consider and approve plan. December 1986 3. Prepare brochure and distribute. Determined By #1 and #2 OBJECTIVES PREPARE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF MACC MEETINGS FOR MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Work Plant 1. Prepare Executive Summary Monthly 2. MACC Representatives distribute to Councils/ Monthly Commissions. Related Activities: r 1. Cablecasting MACC Meetings 2. Customer Service Attitude Survey 3. Press Releases QQA�,I QROhsOTEL_�.14.�_AI,�Q_�fil6I�T_OTH€RS_TO_4JSE_THE_A�CESS_FAC���,T�ESL OBJECTIVES PROVIDE INFORMATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS TO INTEGRATE PUBLIC ACCESS INTO THEIR CURRICULA. Work Plant 1. Compile a package of information (written By May 1986 material and videotapes) on educational access. 2. Contact school districts' administrations and By September brief them on educational access. 3. Assist school districts in producing programs As Needed along the "Homework Assistance" model. 4. Start up the Educational Access Users Group By October of the MACC Access Committee. 1986 5. Update school administrators on educational Regularly access activities. MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 OBJECTIVEa INCREASE AND TECHNICALLY IMPROVE CABLE ACCESS PROGRAMMING The MACC Access Committee is responsible for publicizing community programming. One of their activities is an open house scheduled for February 19, 1986. Staff has requested they develop a workplan for inclusion in our goals and objectives. Related Activities: 1. Staff Access Committee 2. Develop computerized data bast of access users. 3. Monitor Storer Metro's compliance with Franchise Agreement. 4. Provide technical assistance to government users. 5. Increase frequency of coverage of Tigard and Beaverton council meetings. S. Cablecast council meetings "live- " 7. Produce coverage of County Commission meetings. S. Work with other jurisdictions to increase by two, those jurisdictions doing regular council cable coverage. 9. Produce fifteen (15) MACC programs per month. l®. Produce two public service announcements per month. 11. Market video production services to member jurisdictions. ( 12. Establish a policy regarding charges for video productions. 13. Audit/inventory access equipment- 6966.t quipment. 696 �,i�i���1_�TAY�_�J�TNjN THS_�7G_�RAN�HI.SE_��E_DLUS_NQNFRANCHI$E 89YOU99 OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP A 3-5 YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN. Work Planz 1. Prepare a Financial Plan as part of the June 1986 annual budget process. 2. Review Plan with the Budget Committee. May/June 1986 3. Review Plan with the Board; adopted June 1986 by Board. X" MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 OBJECTIVES SEEK TO INCREASE NONFRANCHISE FEE REVENUES. Work Plan% 1. Prepare report on revenue alternatives. May 1986. 2. Discuss report with Budget Committee. May 1986. 3. Implement concepts and ideas recommended by From July Budget Committee and approved by Board. 1986 On QQQLI QRQQN� �_Q_QQQD�NQTED_�TRAIEGY_�OR_gNTRCQIVNECTQ�I_OF SY8TEM�S_IQ_j�IQ�UQ�_QQ[d_QNQ_QCQESSz Work Plans 1. Assess current status of interconnection. By March 1986 2. Establish MACC Ad hoc Committee February 1986 3. Develop strategy and receive approval of Committee. By April 198E 4. Implement strategy. { QQE�= ���T_�.ISI€_Q_Q�QGBAM_TQ_�.NQR�Q$�_IH�_Qs�_QF_I��_QQN_®NQ ��TQH�ISH_��JQLUAIION_C$ITERiA OBJECTIVES MARKET PCN TO PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS Work Plans 1. Establish PCN Advisory Committee March 1986 2. Develop Marketing Plan By April 1986 q 3. Develop brochure. By May 1986 4. PCN Advisory Committee consider and April 1986 y approve marketing plan. 5. Implement plan. From May 198f { -7- MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 ' OBJECTIVE: RESPOND TO IDENTIFIED PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS' TELECOMMUNICATIONS NEEDS Work Plan: 1. Work with public institutions who have an Ongoing identified telecommunications need. 2. Respond to request for proposals. Ongoing 3. Propose demonstration projects. Ongoing OBJECTIVE: DEVELOP SERVICES TO PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS USING RCN Work Plan: 1. Assess potential services and review with September 1986 PCN Advisory Committee. 2. Develop business plans for services. November 1986 3. PCN Advisory Committee recommends potential December 1986 services to Board for approval. 4. Market approved services. December 1986 OBJECTIVE: ESTABLISH EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR PCN Work Plan: 1. Discuss potential criteria with PCN Advisory By November Committee. 1986 2. Prepare report on possible criteria. By December 1986 3. Continued discussion and adoption by First Quarter Committee and Board. 1987 Related Activities: 1. Monitor Network performance. 2. Respond to complaints. 3. Work to improve PCN reliability. 4. Work with Storer Metro for PCN and RSN installations into public facilities. t 5. Develop contracts with existing users effective July 1, 1986. 6. Seek to have $50,000 annualized revenues by January 1, 1987. -8- MACC GOALS WORKPLAN 1986 QL3ALa OEVELOD_AND_PRESENT_TO_STORER METRO_ALTERNATIVES-70_A L=L FOR THE_PRESE_RVATION_OF_UNIVERSAL_SERVI.CE Work Plant 1. Prepare a report on alternatives, including By July 1986 cost and benefits. 2. Create an Ad hoc Board Committee April 1886 3. Report reviewed by Ad hoc Committee; August 1986 strategy approved. 4. Report presented to Storer Metro; September 1986 strategy implemented. f Y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY J AGENDA OF: February 24, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 19, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report January-1985 Community Development PREPARED BY: W. A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEACa ..: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached please find the Monthly report for January, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3. Capital Project Status Report 4. Economic Development Minutes 5. Engineering Division Report 6. Operations Division Reports 7. Planning Commission Minutes 8. P2Aaning Division Monthly Report 9. Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee Minutes (Not Received) ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place on file. (0950p) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON February 19, 1986 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: William A. Monahan. Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report — January, 1985 ort for January, 1985, prepared by the Attached please find the Monthly Rep elopment. Elements of the report are: Department of Community Dew 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3, Capital Project Status Report 4, Economic Development Minutes h 5. Engineering Division Report � 6, Planning Decisions 7, Operations Division Report 8 Transportation Committee Minutes Following is a comparison of building activity for January of 1984 and 1985: January, 1985 January, 1986 Single Family Permits it 39 Multi—Family Permits (total Units) 328 0 Commercial Permits 1 32.492.00 $ 1 Building Permit Fees $ 07 b,518.00 2 Plan Check Fees ,177. 2.225.1212 4,992.50 Plumbing Permits 786.00 430.50 Mechanical Permits Valuation $10.158,762.00 , 2,379,990.00 { r� 3 9{�t For the Month of January, 1986 Building - January was another strong month for residential permits, as 39 were issued. Total permit fees and valuation were well below January of 1985, as a major apartment development of 328 units was processed at that time. In comparison to the 39 single family permits in January of 1986, only 11 were issued for the same period in 1985. The Street of Affordable Homes, Good Cents Homes, and a third show of homes prompted the major permit activity. Economic Development Committee - The Committee met and discussed the proposed downtown non-profit organization. The commitment of monies from non-general fund sources of $10,000 presented in Bob Jean's memo was of great encouragement to the committee. Lee Hames of Tri Met presented plans for a transit center to be located on Commercial Street. A conditional use must be obtained from the City. (WAM:br/0950P) r MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council February 18, 1986 FROM: Planning Staff 4M SUBJECT: Annexation Report for January 1986 On January 6, 1986 an annexation request was submitted to annex 33.41 acres into the City of Tigard. The property is located south of Durham Road adjacent to SW 108th. A public hearing will be scheduled for this proposal before City Council sometime in March. On January 13, 1986 the Tigard City Council approved a resolution to forward a request by Lloyd and Arletta Taylor into the city to the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission. The Taylors own 34.9 acres located south of SW Walnut at the southern terminus of SW 132nd. The Taylor annexation request was forwarded to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission on January 30, 1986. (EAN:pm48) 8 N M LL11 I N .+ H N f .-• nr m . N N N •p � .+ P N &A O N P *+ O m on in A n b m K m m M A m f Y1 O 8 8 s 8 s 8 ;[f CO N P a ® ern .�+ •l1 N O n to*co N •7 N O b q N M le b A f n M P M Ifl N N f OL S W6 Mo O P n M P O P A A M •c to to .0 An A m f f b Y 8 g 8 g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 d a O W A b O A f V4 N in b f .+ at .+ .r •O O O b .r .� P O M ® N r1 N N N N N rl N m $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 m h let � +ntf v 8 C a w O M O at b Ut A N P m M N m W q b n N N M n n Ic M p N M N M M f N M M •"� N N ul M si L 6 L" b 41 � 35' 6 H rt O er+ m r w s r = 4. o a d b co a 1 h epi ¢ w o i o f r4 Lp ., ip O M H1 b h P O� .�. w N N U Y� m O O N N N W m N N N N O P+ N T M T M T M M f f f f 7 M T M M M M M M M M M M s M � N b ++ $ 8 1ff •p 1tf � N 8 n m m M N M .+ S • m M b v .. �n m a ��pp m M O h T V r• a N P m r. O h b M 1 v N M f U1 Ifl b n P P p O N m P w Op 1 Jf Y9) N O a a m W m m m m m m 10 ter+ P H P P n N N N N h n N N ml r• •R h ^ f N n N n P P h N N N 1n P If! In P P N Q N N Mf M b O f m M b m f N M 1f1 1•f b b b h n h O (J is to O P O H iiO O M V 10 N t O U m b f r• O P 1n P b P1-4 m � n n P m h m n P m M O 1fl 1t, P 1n 1n Q! N b N N h M mb 41'1 P f b 6 • f m �+ N M M f f d[ b 1p h �+ 8 8 8 0 0 � 8 Qch = f •!1 M In m h m M f O N M M p N O 10m M M O N m1tf 1, lo .Nr m T r W, b m P - - — — - - O O p8 O O O O O 8 8 8 O 8 .4 gb O 1f1 fP P P P P P f O O ^ f N n n N L a 1B N N M U1 b b m m b b N h > .t f a p � h c 8 M ., It M f m .-1 V co P N N rl N rl N N N T M T M f L 4. L Lry L 6 per. uo 3.pp o c P 4. ¢u L h h N O i O 1'rf v a MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: February 3, 1986 SUBJECT: BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MONTH OF Janua}�ry 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS/TYPE VALUE OF WORK PERMIT FEE PLAN CHECK 4% 39 new single family res. $2,379-9990.00 12,050.00 6.518.10 4.82 4 res. a-terations 46,642.00 358.00 232.72 14.32 1 new commercial 261,000.00 835.00 543.08 33.42 7 coml. alterations 70,475.00 540.00 336.90 21.60 1 misc. structures(res.move) 5,000.00 50.50 32.83 2.02 1 other demolition -0 15.00 -0- .60 TOTAL VALUE 2,762,927.00 ..0 King City Z4 Mechanical permits 430.50 -0- 17.20 ,,.. Plumbing Permits 4,992.50 193.91 signs nom w�LSewer Connections (20%) (40 @ $35.00,1 @ $195.00) 1,595.00 -A.L Sewer Inspections (1007) 1,435.00 TLQ Amart/Wedgwood 6,840.00 �n Lenon Hts. 3,000.00 �6 � f - February 19, 1986 ` CAPITAL PR03ECT MONTHLY STATUS REPORT L.I.D. 's 72nd Street L.I.D. Closed out. 68th 6 Parkway Street L.I.D. Construction is about one week ahead of schedule, and the project is more than 10% complete. 68th Sewer LID No new information to report. 135th Street L.I.D. On hold pending Urban Planning Area Agreement. 74th and Cherry Sewer L.I.D. Notices regarding informal property owners meeting will be sent out early next week. 100th and Inez Engineer has completed a second design which includes two main lines instead of one. Property owners meeting to be held in about three weeks. Dartmouth Street L.I.D. No decision from the Court of Appeals as yet. Hall/Burnham Street L.I.D. Neither the church nor Mr. Sturgis have accepted City's purchase offer. The church has submitted a counter—offer. Mr. Sturgis is concerned about the possible need to remove trees from his two properties. The City Administrator, Community Development, and Project Engineer will meet with Ed Hardt, ODOT Metro Regional Engineer this week to discuss the full range of issues related to the project. Canterbury Signal L.I.D. No new information. C.I.P. 's Ts The main and Commercial Street overlay projects have been eliminated pending further study. The Cascade area drainage project has been eliminated due to higher costs than anticipated. r: Engineering services agreements on other C.I.P. projects will be executed this week. x; 0950P TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES - January 21, 1986 MEMBERS PRESENT: John Savory, Amo DeBernardis. Pat Kennedy, Dick Cochran, Jim Corlis, Kathy Budney OTHERS PRESENT: Lee Hames, Geraldine Ball, Mary Bross, Dee Dee Harrington, Deborah Stuart, Bill Monahan The minutes of the December 17, 1985 meeting were reviewed and approved as written. John and Bill gave an update of the status of the downtown non-profit organization formation. Don Hanson was unable to attend the meeting, however. he has been active circulating surveys to businesses to determine their interest. Bill displayed a map which delineated the proposed boundaries of the downtown, including commercial areas on Pacific Highway. Amo and Pat suggested that Tigard Plaza and Park 217 be included as well as First Interstate Banka Bill will develop a few concepts for the area for review. John reported that the Chamber is considering a relocation to the downtown area as its present lease arrangement is up. Bill noted that the Main Street bridge has been added to the City's Capital Improvement Program. Engineering will be completed in year one. A memo from City Administator Bob Jean was discussed which describes his commitment to the downtown area. If a downtown organization is formed and joins the Main Street Program, he would support the following: 1. Development, adoption and designation of the Downtown/Fenno Creek Park Plan for the entire Downtown area as a city-wide park. . . 2. Engineering and construction funding of those projects identified but not yet authorized on the 18 month CIP list. . . 3. Discounted lease rates for the Old City Hall if based jointly to the Chamber, Downtown Association, and I-5 Corridor Association. . . 4. Finally, if 50% or more of the eligible merchants join the Association, I'd propose that the City fund a $10,000 first year cash grant, a $7,000 second year and $4,000 third year grant. The Committee was encouraged by the committment. Amo proposed that the Committee get together as soon as possible with Don Hanson to apprise him of the memo and to determine the next steps necessary. The Committee then discussed whether the- Main Street Program was needed for the group to be successful. Bill endorsed the program by citing the track record of the program and the technical support available from successful operations i other communities. He noted that Katie Brand, director of the Forest Grove program, had indicated a willingness to attend the next meeting to discuss the Forest Grove success. Amo suggested that we also discuss the progress of the program with business people. John will contact Don Hanson so that he and Bill can get together with Don to discuss the formation of the downtown organization. t Lee Hames of Tri Met described plans for the new transit center scheduled for completion in 1986 on Commercial Street. A conditional use permit was granted for the center to locate on the site of the Tigard Auto Body in 1987. That permit has lapsed so new designs are being prepared for a new submittal. The plan will include the present Greyhound building, a canopied area for bus patrons, possibly leased space for businesses which are service oriented to bus patrons, landscaped areas, and area to accomodate bus loading and storage. ' The plan will be similar to the Beaverton station. The plans must be reviewed by the Federal Government also. Lee pointed out that funds are committed to the project and are not affected by the Gramm-Redman Act. State lottery funds are also committed to the project, as well as a 20% local match ' provided by the former property owner, Dick Kadel. Discussion centered on the need for parking affiliated with the center. Tri Met is now exploring sites in Tigard for Park and Ride facilities. Downtown parking lots committed to all-day parking of transit customers is not envisioned, nor is it compatible with downtown needs. Locations on Barbur and Pacific Highway are being reviewed. Tri Met is looking for 3 to 4 acre sites as they can accomodate 100 cars per acre. The Prairie Market site, althought in the Downtown, was suggested for evaluation. John raised the issue that one on street drop-off space was inadequate, given present use at the bus stop in front of the former Zoop's store. Lee pointed out that the plans presented are preliminary and could be c"ed prior to f submittal for a conditional use permit. At the time of submittal materials, f landscaping, paving, and design will be firmed up. She noted that efforts E will be made to make the facility vandal-proof. Benches, public telephones, lighting and bike racks will be added. No public restrooms are planned. The Metro Solid Waste Transfer station was discussed. John's letter to METRO ! was among those submitted in opposition to locating the facility in Tigard. METRO dropped the site from consideration. No developers were present to discuss plans for development. Other Business John noted that Tony Orlandini hs resigned from the Committee, Oue to the fact that his business is no longer in Tigard. John asked for assistance in locating a possible replacement, preferably someone with a business on Pacific Highway. c t The meeting adjourned at 9:00 A.M. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 18, 1986, at 7:30 A.M. at Pioneer Pies. (WAM:br43) .e MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: William A. Monahan, February 13, 1986 Director of Community Development FROM: Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager SUBJECT: Engineering Monthly Report for January, 1986 I. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/PERMITS A. Land—Use Application Review ... ....•........••••........•••• 8% (74) B. Public Improvement Permits .... ................. ........... 20% (184) C. Property Vacations (i.e. Plats, easements, street ...,) ••• . 1% (9) II. SURVEY AND MAPPING A. Survey 1. City Wide Control •...... ..... ......................... 7% (64) _ 2. Public Works Operations "Maintenance" Projects ........ O% C 3. Capital Projects . , ........ ............................. 0% B. Mapping/Drafting 1. City Wide Information mapping 21% (193) 2. Department mapping ........... ......................... 0% 3. Construction/Misc. Drawings 0% III. TRAFFIC/LIGHTING A. Streetlights ................................................. 1X (9) B. Signals................ ....... ............................... 1X (9) IV. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT A. Public Facility Master Plans/Policy Review Assistance 1% (9) (i.e. Streets, sewer, storm drainage, etc...,) ........ B. Capital Improvement Program Assistance/Support gX (74) (i.e., Project Coordination, Plan Review, Inspection) ..... V. PUBLIC/AGENCY ASSISTANCE ........................................ 9% (83) VL. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND MISC. ......•..•••••••••••••••••••••• lOX (92) ionssick leave, etc....,). 13% (120) VII. NON—PRODUCTIVE TIME (Holidays, vacat , VI.Revenue Activity FY 84-85 FY 85-86 A. Engineering Service Fees & Charges JANUARY JANUARY 1. Improvement Permits (I.B) 6,614.18 975.00 JANUARY thru JANUARY 25,566.39 61,663.30 B. Public Works Operations Fees & Charges FY 84-85 FY 85-86 January January 1. Streetlights . . . . . . . . . . 76.25 - 0 - 2. Traffic control Signing . . . . . . 2,065.67 - 0 - NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS DECEMBER 1. First Baptist Church street opening permit - SW Gaarde. (• 2. John Klune - street opening permit - 12300 SW Duchilly (RSC:br/084OP) r ate. 1..• m O. 8 W I o N I ' ► �� ! i 1 i I 171 i 1 i I I N 6 W i N I� 1 I I i I m I w�i m 1 IJr1 e14•1 e� ago I n �i I�i1 I /^- =° I rn ^ ^Imo ai ao n J v a ` c o v W Mi WI , N ',A' c C4 � �, �► �� a`' `1 � I I i I i � ( i t T i l a di J I P f a m o n l ao W > N ' 10 ' 0��� I 1 ^ M it f I i 1 m _ +A VN'f i O+ O M M V1 M „W 1 n M 1O M � N I v1 171 W O. l a .+ I 1 F � i O, Q prp�l� co n. J of 'D 'T �o um1 �/1 1 WUN w l e o 171 a a W N to N I 1� J I In /'1 m Y' V% n co r lc en e1 1 -T T 1: t� m M O� • YI .r 1 a n P n v1 m I .•1 �p e+1 N '•1 ' , cc el W P1 W ' m �I 1 1 � Z a0 6' �i N W Z N A. N h Z h 3 1 N N d tR N( 4.1 i 0 O W, Y! O w w w Y I S I O.i t O 'O '0 b C C w 1 al w Y 1 S } u, 1. 1 I 1 m N O O D 7 0. OI 6 u• . Y w d d d d a d b9. W A ? a0 u V d 1 H b > T > > > 'O > 'OI > N d as 0 V i u O w V Y Y y v d al d w al Y al 01 a Y w / 1. S .d s O O S S S t t O A O .0 .•1 al - U I O � p '.U U d U 4. W U U U U U la. U W U� •.i U W W T a 0 -N m m T m W co N O O N 10 N n n n n m n n Ip .oOD I c ON e% n n n i-.I n n r.I r.i 0 n �i a Ch x y N .o' Y � O � O 4 u •Ni {Fr � t � M H M a Y OG po �1 N l•i M v � O m O O Y vt v. u 00 Q H x C .a 4 x X 7 6 � O J b fti 3 3 m N P /•1 41 f�•1 n y h N en W N ] .0 � O u W In O. e+i Q x N O , x •^i 1� 1� N N 1.1 P1 w Y N W a e ao 0 .. co W 110 /m'1 fN•1 .O O co IT F 1+1 i0 V1 W b V a> cn N 1 • 8 � m u > � OD O .O 00 C 4 .O Y C OO aI 3• N I- 14 ..e F a W u 14 C Z i+. w• C O p •7 V] •d t W M W N N ! u 01 l•1 co •r r f•1 Yy F 17 ! n n O m cD ao h F W pa.. Wa � r% N\ NnV el% .1% Irn N cV cV2 Nvvv vv (fit` v NOD OD C� Pt Y' 7 V1 PI O P 2 P1 2 M n vrc Y , CL I I m c N V1 1 I �■ ao P1 M 1. n N I is co 3:4 • t 1 1 N I I <1 4I O v N l��1 n OD ^� V O� I u'1 �O •" I .T cn OO .4 ( '1 �O v en.p1i /f n ..� v1 H1 f7 N ih aD � w I i.7 O n O O .+ C. pfin d I I N .r ... .y e�•1 , .�Di .+ II I, OD Pf C-4 .fir P1 P1 N n �O N 7 .r m r OD n O P1 OD N a0 P1 N .N.. mO00 a y N N O .y N .y N r = n v1 M N OD n T Pt .t N M n H lh co N Vl .4 n. co N 1N W% � �p N O� d O• N n �O V1 �D O N O J N W O N D 0 N OO 0 O OOD OD ON m O� OD n tT OD %O .O N N P1 P1 P1 n %O sw Or. u1 S .+ N n n N ^ N n .pr N encn gn ■D O n co co .+ n ao aO ao n n tO. N OD N N Pt P1 P1 I •m � W a a M -a a a w C. a O. D a i a a. i O w u M W M M N W MI M H 'D b b 'O 'O .� O• '4 'O �I dt 'O 'O b 'V L .p' T �? IV N a d b W N N v v .°. e o m > > > > v eo be > u w > a > > u u r+ Y Y40 Y M V 'G Y Y Y Y $ $ Y • Y ^' Y F F F F Y O O F F N Y F F F F ■ ■ .4 P1 P) Y O N O N Op co m O %C�O aD co co co co p p O N N N N N N N NN N N t L` it 00 CD cc, 1 i i O I C Ci c� O I �', ( .-. ••'.' "�M 11 1 I 1 .-. of � i � � X11 � { ^ � ` o, 1 o co ON ! r .0 CN t M N , G' 1 S ' M 1 W 1 n M M 1 `� ' N I � '"t j co i 1 00 C-4 14 00 hs 1 1 %O ^] M .-� t7� N to M .-+ �T I O, N M r co en -Ir cn IT I I 1 I ---- 1 co w O til W O v E A 7 1 A d 2 Cl W W 0. H I U( 1-4 W d f1z Ca I1-4 Ln j 1 E- cNn rn o rn ON cr� o O 00 an p M N M C H 7 7 %.O V1 V1 O M M 00 �Y ON %D n .-+ O� ^� .-+ M n O 7 W M 7 ts7 �O N 7 �O O 7 7 H d N r- A r+ N O 7 H a a 93. w M OD M M %D 00 �+ W 10�1 n N in n �O ez a — n Ln OH 00 L - a Co W CYN ►� a �., CL an°'c oc .. m O w C 3 o a H JJ vi 7 p .-� N 1- M n PO O .'F. O •a d W n p en 00 P 7 P+ H N 7 u1 00 M N 7 O� LI .-i n cd A m Co .-+ N .r t- P+ M Vt �O •-+ 7 .--i v1 O% N H M �� co H N o+ N O Z 4; W 7 M O M Ln cli •. U M O) ai u �+ u m44 $4 Vi a t W 0 O a a 0 O 0 u 0 0 ri d -' .-a to •n sa p..c a t+ u a v H +i V4 c0 w of %V 0) e0 0) 10 a 0) O ? o H a 5e a a a 04 a 0 sz w H t MONTHLY REPORTG`1YOFT16ARD WASHINGTON axx-TY.OREGON DATE: 2/5/86 FOR MONTH OF: January 1986 OPERATIONS OFFICE: WASTE WATER: 2.1.2 102.5 hrs Sanitary Sewer Clean 4.0 hrs Storm Drain Clean 8.0 hrs Sanitary Repairs 21.0 hrs Catch Basin 32.0 hrs Manhole Repairs 2.25 hrs Flooding 9.0 hrs Storm Drain Repair STREETS 2.1.3 61.0 hrs Street Cleaning 99.0 hrs Patching 133.0 hrs Sign Maintenance 17.5 hrs Brushing/Limbing _ 4.0 hrs Grading/ Rocking 4.0 hrs Sanding PARKS 2.1.4 GREEN THUD 15.5 hrs Irrigation 5.0 hrs Restroom Maintenance 2.0 hrs Building Maintenance 176.75 hrs Landscaping 133.5 hrs Landscaping 60.5 hrs Trails Maintenance 4.0 hrs Trails Maintenance 8.5 hrs Construction 73.0 hrs Litter Patrol 3.5 hrs Litter Patrol SUPPORT SERVICES 2.1.5 18.5 hrs P.M. on Equipment 128.0 hrs Scheduled Repairs 21.75 hrs Unscheduled Repairs 23.25 hrs Fabrication 8.25 hrs General Support 12755 o.vv.AS P.O.BOX 23337 -::TIGARD,OREGON 97223. PH:639-4171 2/12/86 PARK MAINTENANCE REPORT: For Month of: January 1986 There was a-,total of 168.5 maintenance hours at COOK PARK, with 16.0 hours irrigation maintenance, 3.0 hours restroom maintenance, 104.0 hours landscaping, 15.0 hours trails maintenance and 30.5 hours litter patrol. CITY EMPLOYEES GREEN THUMB LABOR Irrigation maintenance 16.0 Restroom maintenance 3.0 Landscaping 67.0 37.0 Trails maintenance 7.0 8.0 Litter patrol 30.5 JACK PARK: 30.25 24.0 WINDMILL: 2.5 BUS STOPS: 9.0 SUMMERLAKE: 18.5 GENESIS: 9.25 _ WOODARD: 9.75 ENGLEWOOD: 90.0 51.0 ' DOWNTOWN: 1.5 99 PATH: 1.75 MAIN: 2.25 LIBERTY: 2.75 FANNO CREEK: 2.0 CITY HALL: 1.0 POLICE DEPARTMENT: 1.0 OPERATIONS YARD: 54.5 8.0 a -k { An additional twenty hours was performed by Community Service .labor. �1 �t COMMUNITY SERVICE VOLUNTEER WORKERS Washington County Corrections For the Month of: January 1986 City of Tigard NAME Hrs Ordered Hrs Worked Wash. County Juvenille Dept Michael Bayse 20 GREEN THUMB LABOR Marvin Mosely 77 Walt Van Tuyl 94 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICE 20 TOTAL GREEN THUMB 171 r PLANNNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVENUE REPORT - JANUARY 1986 CITY PLANNING HEARINGS DIRECTOR"S DOCUMENT MONTHLY REVENUES COUNCIL COMMISSION OFFICER DECISION SALES Totals from July 1985 $450.00 $ 350.00 $1,000,00 $1,415.00 $187.35 GT ($3,402,35) Totals from Aug. 1985 150.00 3,200.00 --0-- 2,715.00 94.65 GT ($6,159.65) Totals from Sept. 1985 -0- -0- -0- 675.00 229.30 GT($ 904.30) Totals from Oct. 1985 -0-- 930.00 500.00 675.00 173.80 GT ($2,278.80) Total from Now. 1985 - 0-- -0- 800.00 1,315.00 150.40 GT ($2,265.40) Total from Dec. 2300.00 200.00 -0- 1,490.00 213.00 GT ($4,203.00) JANUARY Applicant/Payee Receipt # McMonagle/Harris 9859 1275.00 (ZCA/PD/S) Westdale 9884 300.00 Lincoln Say./Loan 9915 340.00 (S) Walter West 10045 1,000.00 (2 SDR's) OTAK 10086 415.00 (S) Martin Bros. 10097 200.00 (SCE) Heath NW Inc. 10273 200.00 (SCE) Sam Gotter 10021 285.00 (S) Sandra Lawrance 10350 75.00 (HOP) Gene Davis 10387 500.00 (SL) Robert Claus 10343 280.00 Oregon Sign 10140 50.00 (Sign) Sub Shop 10081 20.00 (Sign) Columbia Neon 10427 10.00 (Sign) Jeffrey Hjorth 10483 10.00 (Sign) All Seasons Sign 9933 10.00 (Sign) Cornerstone & A. 10490 150.00 (SDR) Document Sales Misc 144.00 CD Document Sales Misc. JANUARY TOTALS 1,275.001 1,720.00 500.00 1,625.00 144.00 GT ($5,264.00) TOTALS TO DATE: $4,175.00 $6,400.00 $2,800.00 $9,910.00 $1,192.00 YTD ($24,477.00) FYTD — November 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS DIRECTOR"S DECISIONS 9 CPA Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Also CC) it MLP Minor Land Partition 4 ZC Zone Change 15 SDR Site Development Review 5 ZCA Zone Change Annexation (CC) 10 V Variance 5 ZGA Zone Ordinance Amendment (Also CCO 5 TU Temporary Use 2 PD Planned Development 22 HOP Home Occupation 1 1 S Subdivision 10 M Misc. (Lot Line Adj . 4 SCE Sign Code Exception flexible setbacks) HEARINGS OFFICER DECISIONS 4 SL Sensitive Lands Permit 3 CU Conditional Use WM:dj54 y_ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council February 18, 1986 FROM: Jerri L. Widner, Finance Director ^^' SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY — JANUARY The month of January was busy with the final engineer's report for 72nd. Avenue, requiring notices to property owners, refunding of overpayments and requesting payment from two parcels that underassessed. During January the following activity occurred: Phone calls 7,215 Walkins 21905 Work Orders Processed 219 Average Turnaround time per work order 5.9 hrs. Total number of pages processed 16,612 Accounts Payable Checks 346 Payroll Checks 255 Sewer Billings 1,738 Cash Receipts 2,596 Purchase Orders Processed 93 Saif Claims Filed 1 Recruitments 2 Terminations 1 Unemployment Claims Filed 1 The claims status report is attached for your review. 1260F CITY OF TIGARD 1/30/86 CLAIM STATUS REPORT DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 2/13/85 Mervin Boen False arrest pending 8/21/84 George Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity (Officers Johnson, Ober, & Newman) 2/4/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Hal Merrill) 3/20/83 Fred Ozan False arrest Appleal Filed (Officer Killion) 1/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending (Office Merrill) Unknown George Hludaik Alleges his constitutional pending rights violated Unknown Neil Gerrard Alleges his constitutional pending rights were violated 7/20/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened 3/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending 9/6/b5 Farmers Ins. etal Alleges officers caused pending panic stop (Officer Jim Newman) 10/16/65 Opal Kaske Failed to yield right-of-way pending 9124/85 Henninia Arias Tripped fell on sidewalk pending 12/6/85 Cpl Johnson Damaged vehicle when parking pending 11/26/85 Lujon Apts Sewer backup Pending (DH:pm/0886F) �:" TIGARD U %.* 0 m ne 639-9 11 12566 SW Main•Tigard. Or.97223 MONTHLY REPORT January 1986 TO: LIBRARY BOARD CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN WCCLS: The new intergovernmental agreement for county-wide library service was revised to extend through June 1987, the period for the current levy. More re- visions have been made to the automation agreement and it is anticipated that both documents will be signed by the City in February. The governance issue continued to be discussed at the professional board meeting January 16 and at the Citizens Advisory Board, Ad Hoc City Managers and Governing Bodies Repre- sentatives meeting that same day. City librarians, managers and elected of- ficials continued to voice their disapproval of forming a library district before further options could be explored. It was announced that the CAB's proposal for a library district would be on the Washington County Board of Commissioners' agenda February 11 and that cities would be asked to comment on the proposal. Cities to include Durham and King City, but excepting Banks and North Plains, have already voiced their disapproval for the library district as proposed. Dedication Committee: Librarian will serve as staff member for the Civic Center Dedication Committee. - Librate Furnishings: A Request for Quotations was sent to vendors for bids on the remaining furniture to be purchased for the new library. Bids are due on February 7, 1986. Still to be purchased are plants as well as the refinishing of three antique � pieces. Volunteer Brunch: Library volunteers were honored at a brunch on January 27, 1986 at Durham Station. Thirty persons attended. Jean Lindsay, new volunteer coordinator (also a volunteer) , was introduced. Personnel: Dan Stuntz, sponsored by TCYS, finished his 160 hours. Twenty-six volun- teers gave a total of 277 hours; daily average 10.7 hours; staff time 4.5 hours. Five community service assignees worked a tntai of. 23.5 hours; daily average .9 hours; staff time 2 hours. Library Board gave 8.5 hours. Youth Services: Another story time was added for a total of three each week; one morning, one afternoon, one evening. Winter Toddler Time began and filled up immedi- ately. The spring session is already filled by those who could not sign up for winter. This suggests that two sessions could run concurrently. The sessions, in order to be a successful, must be limited to 10 parents with children. Gaarde School 6th graders are displaying their original poetry. There are five new volunteers to help with } youth services. A "Parenting Books" list has been developed and will be distributed to local pediatricians in the area. A "Favorite Read Alouds" list was sent to Hopkins Elementary School which is sponsoring a read aloud program for K-2 students and their parents. 3 TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY —MONTHLY REPORT - January 1986 - page 2 s, Work Indicators: January 1986 January 1985 Adult Materials 6671 7025 Juvenile Materials 3807 2990_ TOTAL 10,478 10,015 Days of Service 22 22 * Average Daily Circulation 476 455 Increase/Decrease Circ +5Z -3x Reference/Readers' Advisory 264 421 Story Time Attendance (sessions) 83 (6) 46 (5) Special Children's Programs 3 (sessions) 29 (2) 72 (6) A. Materials Added/With:rawn 669/161 510/247 Borrowers: New/Renewal 207/107-316 211/154365 4p Note: Juvenile circulation almost doubled from December 1985 to January 1986 -- 1696 to 2940. The total Juvenile non-fiction circulation reached 715 -- `° the largest ever. pa Y I x :. �4 TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT 1985 yEARLY Report / I• Calls for Service: 15,656 j4,479.4 A. Obligated Time--2-3—,O92.9 B. Non-Obligated Time 6 ' IT. PART i CRIMES * No. Cleared Arrests A. Homicide 3 1 B. Rape 39 13 C. Robbery 35 17 9 D. Assault 3 - 57 53 38 E. Burglary 383 247 206 F. Larceny 77�50 - 14 12 G. Auto Theft 7 1 3 H. Arson 354 296 PART I TOTALS: 1,290 t` III. PART II TOTALS 1,029 615 523 €. TOTAL - Part I and II 2,319 969 819 IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARGED: 819 c. Juvenile Male 2966 . a. Adult Hale r„_..39 d. Juvenile Female b. Adu 1 t Fema 1 e _.•._ 140 ML V. W $180,601 VT. TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 921,913 TOTAL PROPERTY RECOVERED VII. TRAFFIC - a, Accidents Investigated 384 injury Accidents 97 Fatal 1- b. Citations: VBR (Speeding) 1264 Yield Right of Way 74 Following too Close, 19 Red Light 583 Stop Sign 122 Improper Turn 103 Reckless Driving 11 55 Careless Driving_126 Driving Under the Influence 5L While Sus ended 96 other Hazardous 402_ Driving P ' Non-Hazardous 1.966 Total Hazardous 2955___ #' c. Enforcement Index 30.15 d. Traffic Enforcement Totals Citations: 4,921 4` Warnings: 3,914 : L Clearance Rate 27 4$ -- N+ NO n. _ part I Crimes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate 59.8% part II Crimes (Minor Crimes) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24. 1986, AGENDA ITEM #: f 6 , a- DATE SUBMITTED: February 19, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEJAGENDA TITLE: Notice of Decisions V 20-85, Davidson & HOP 2-86, Lawrence PREPARED BY: Community Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: m:asaraaassa aas asasassssaasrss amsacts ammamsaaassassasasasasasrmwmsam:wmmsmammsmas POLICY ISSUE asssmmssmmrswmrmsssrmms:sassaswmenmmsssrsssrassmwsasssasrawmmswmwsssmrsmsmmrrsrwsa INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the Notice of Decisions for the following: 1. V 20-85 a request by William G. Davidson for a variance to delete a portion of a public sidewalk in conjunction with the development of a car wash and maintenance facility on property zoned C-G, located at 12860 SW Pacific Highway. 2. HOP 2-86 a request by Sandra K. Lawrence for a Home Occupation Permit for an interior design business office on property zoned R-4.5, located at 9850 SW GarrettStreet. srwmrrsssmrsrrssasmsstetssrtssrsmaris:wrssrmsrrrsrwsrmsrawswsrmrsrsraaruwrsrrorramsw ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and file. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. t•t�rswrrsatesfsssmsasms+esmssm:ssrm:rsrrmsrsramrsssswsmmwrsmsmtersamssrrsssmssrrmssws SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file: P t CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION VARIANCE V 20-85 Request by William G. Davidson for a variance to delete a APPLICATION: q unction with the development of a car a portion of a public sidewalk inrooerty zoned C--G (Commercial General) and maintenance facility on Prop 1601 and 1700) Highway (WCC 2S1 28D T.L. located and 12860 SW Pacific Director for the City of DECISNotice is hereby g . given that the Planning The findings and ION: Tigardhas DENIED the above described aPPlication conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. ' A. FINDING OF FACT i i 1, Background ranted in Site Development Review approval (SDR 17-85) was 9 Cit 's half street improvement December., 1985 for the development of y a car wash and maintenance facility. The Variance to the ht beforr. City Council and s ; requirement for sidewalk was broion regarding the Variance was directed to issue a decision reg t 2 Vicinity Information Pacific are The properties Parcels to the ro erties to the devotedto commercial euses.st long are also zoned C-G and are Residential, 12 units/acre)isa orated south are zoned 'tments and a church. The Property developed with ape with to the east at the end °Res dentiial, 25eIs units/acre)devel�ped apartments and is zoned R-25 ( act Property Walnut Place is a public street which abutsthe tithe immediate and also provides access for all thele eloped with pavement and vicinity. This street is presently curbs, but no sidewalks. Site Information and Proposal Description 3 is Walnut Place side) of the property The rear section ( building operated by the undeveloped except far a small recycling Lion's Club. The portion near the rwalnut ar ltat h Pat if is Highway portion by a self-se intersection is occupiedcar wash and The applicant proposes to remove the existing in the construct a new, six stall, self-service rvice fascility (Oil Canco An automot portion of the Property• car wash site. Access Will Henry's) is proposed for the existing on Pacific Highway be provided by the existing driveway nt and four driveways on Walnut Place. serves Davidson's restaura NOTICE OF DECISLQN - V 24--85 PAGE - 1 The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the installation of a public sidewalk only along the western property frontage and not the south side of the parcel. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division is opposed to the variance primarily because of the apartment units at the end of Walnut Place and the lack of any sidewalks at the present time. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the request. NPO #1 recommends denial of the variance. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Section 18.134.050 of the Code requires the following approval criteria for variance proposals: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonable possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affer„ed any more than would occur if the development were locateu as specified in the Code; and 5. The hardship is not self—imposed and the variance requested is tho minimum variance wh ch would alleviate the hardship. Policies 8.1.1 and 8.1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan call for the provision a safe street system and sidewalks. The deletion of this sidewalk would cause pedestrians to walk in the street or to cut through private property. There do not appear to be any peculiar circumstances which would make the installation of a sidewalk impractical or unfeasible. Based upon the above findings, the proposed variance is not justified. NOTICE OF DECISION — V 20-85 — PAGE 2 The landscaping plan that was approved as part of SDR 17-85 did not include the sidewalk which is the subject of this request. However, this plan was approved with the understanding that the proposed landscaping areas on the southern Walnut Place frontage would need to be shifted five feet to the north if the Variance was not approved. The Code requires that parking and loading areas be buffered by landscaped areas that are a minimum of three feet in width. C. DECISION Based upon the above finding and conclusions the Planning Director denies V 20-85. 0. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: The applicant & owners Owners of record within the required distance j( The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON ---r-=.ir F� UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.3;.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. �y 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigan! Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. PREPAR I r tb LidenP1 r DATE 01 William A. Monahan, Director of Planning 6 Development DATt AOA6RdVED (KSL:bs112) NOTICE OF DECISION -- V 20-85 - PAGE 3 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION fi HOP 2-86 APPLICATION: A request by Sandra K. Lawrence for a Home Occupation Permit for an interior design business office on property zoned R-4.5 (Residential, 4 Single Family, 4.5 units per acre). D.B.A. "Sarah Lawrence-Interior Design." Location 9850 SW Barrett Street (WCTM 2S1 2CC Tax Lot 400). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background In 1980, Patricia Jacobson applied for, and received approval for a zone change from Washington Co RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 (Single Family Residential, 7 units unit). A minor land partition (M6-80) was approved in 1980 also, thereby creating 2 parcels. 2. Vicinity Information Surrounding properties to the north, east, south, and west are all zoned R-4.5 (Single Family Residential, 4.5 units per acre). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 1900 square foot home on the property. The applicant is proposing to use 190 square feet for the business. The business use as proposed will not occupy more thein 25% of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO #1 will be notified of the Directors derision and will have the right to appeal. 8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18. 142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 2-86 is approved b'ect to certain Pasubject conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the home in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home. - NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 2-86 - PAGE 1 cY y 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in conjunction with the business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall bc, paid annually for the business. 6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is ,Audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval. is valid if PKercised within one year of the final decision date not.od below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice, was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and m.Ai lod to: XXX 1 he ,,jpp l i l arrt & owners XXX Ownrers of record within the required distance XXX They affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XXX — Affoctrrd <3ovocnmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHAT l E11 F1NAt ON �¢;V ev UNLESS AN APPEAL_ IS FILED. 3. AppeAl: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.,790(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the f;1TY Rt-VORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. A'4 The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. A`,,t-' 4. 22Rst_ions: If you teavit any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO nox 23:397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. PR PARE bosh A. S ar Ass' ant Planner DATE William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development 0 TE PROVED (DAS:bsi11) NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 2--86 PAGE 2 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 1-86 APPLICATION: A request by Larry and Martha White for a Home Occupation Permit for "Postal Plus", a bulk-mail processing business in an R-4.5 zone (Residential, Single Family, 4.5 units per acre). Location: 9375 SW Millen Drive. (WCTM 2S1 14AB Lot 5400). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information Properties to the north, east and south are zoned R-4.5 (Single Family Residential 4.5 units per acre. Properties to the west are zoned R-7 (Single Family Residential, 7 units per acre). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 2200 square foot home on the property. The applicant proposes to use 450 square feet for the business. The applicant and family will occupy the remainder of the home. The business as proposed will not occupy more than 25% of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO N6 will be notified of the Director's decision and will have the right to appeal. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Thero p posal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 1-86 is approved subject to the following conditions: i. There shall be no people working in the home in conjunction with y business who are not residents of the home. NOTICE OF DECISION - HOP 1-86 - PAGE 1 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in conjunction with business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XXX The applicant b owners XXX Owners of record within the required distance XXX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XXX Affected governmental agencies 2. final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community be Development Code which provides that a written appeal must en filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. al 4. 29Qstions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. ' AW REPAREQ Y: Deborah A. Stuart, Assi tant Planner GATE Willi na an, i ct r of Planning 6 Development DATE APPROVED (OAS:bs115) NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 1-86 — PAGE 2 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Februar 24 1486 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: Februar24, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of OLGC A 1 ications PREPARED BY: �LLor REQUESTED BY: Various Applicants DEPARTMENT NERD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: -- POLICY ISSUE _ INFORMATION SUMMARY The fallowing businesses have submitted renewal a lications far Council approval: R Appl O Skipper's Seafood & Chowder Nouse, 11585 SW Pacific Hwy . , The following business has submitted change of ownership for Council approval: O Los Baez Mexican Reastaurant, 11475 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application rant application was approved a short time ago by the Las Baez Mexican Restau now changing the names of the owners. The Council, however, they are Department has conduced records and of all appl cations checks and the Acting Chief police recommends app TLA ERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve all applications. 2. Approve some applications. 3. Deny application requests. k SUGGESTED ACTION Approve all applications. g lw/3585A ,r `s CITY OF TIGARD,_OREGON / COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: _February 19 1.986 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of OLCC Applications PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson REQUESTED BY: Various Applicants DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ROLSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The following businesses have submitted renewal applications for Council approval: O Tigard Bowl, 11660 SW Pacific Highway, RMB Application o Circle K Store #572,9930 SW Walnut Street, PS Application a Godfather's Pizza, 12286 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. , R Application o Savory Sandwich, 242 Tigard Plaza, R Application o Greenway Pub, 12272 SW Scholls Ferry Rd. , RMB Application The following business has submitted change of ownership & change of privil_e9e application for Council approval: `.e o Funnelli's Pizza, 14385 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application The Police Department has conducted records and background checks and the Acting Chief of Police recommends approval of all applications. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve a.11 applications. 2. Approve some applications. 3. Deny application requests. SUGGESTED_.ACTION Approve all applications. lw/3585A ,i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON T0: Lonnie Branstetter February 14, 1986 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications Please process the background checks on the following businesses and make recommendation for Council approval on 2/24/86. Your report should be returned to me by FEBRUARY 19, 1986. RENEWAL APPLICATIONS: 3 Tigard Bowl Circle K Store No. 572 11660 SW Pacific Hwy. 9930 SW Walnut Street RMBApplication PS Application CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP & CHANGE OF PRIVILEGE APPLICATION: (This paper work was transmitted to you on 2/13/86) Funnellis Pizza 14385 SW Pacific Highway M R Application { lw/3585A .l l t { CI �TIFARD WASHHIN�N COUNTY.OREGON POLICE DEPARTMENT =DYER DEPARTMENT METC�RANDUM TO: Loree (Milson DATE: 2-18-86 FRCM pet, Lt. L. Branatetter SUBJECT: Fgnn2lits Pigza Ligugr License New applicants for this business have been checked for criminal record and show no history. i r 3 -5s �^ 902o S.W.BURNtiAM •P.O.BOX 23397•TiGARD.OREGON 97223- PH:633-6168 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Lonnie Branstettter \ February 18, 1986 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications Please process the background checks on the following businesses and make recommendation for Council approval on 2/24/86. Your report should be returned to me by FEBRUARY 19, 1986. RENEWAL APPLICATIONS: Savory Sandwich Godfather's Pizza 242 Tigard Plaza 12286 SW Scholls Ferry Road R Application R Application lw/3585A ,6,ve /Lz� A f � / 0. y MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW EMPLOYEE Robert W. Jean DATE 3/3/86 POSITION City Administrator REVIEW'PERIOD Mar 85 - Feb. 83 ^DEPARTMENT City Administration LAST RkVIN" Audi. '85 REVIEWER City Council CURRENT SALARY $3979/mo. TYPE OF REVIEW: GOAL SETTING END PROBATION PRdGRLS§ ''� PERFORMANCE X 1. MAJOR GOAIS/PROJECTS FROM LAST REVIEW: COMPLETION %: (0-55% Little or No Significant Progress..56-75% So*Ci Progz4ss, Most Yet To Go. 76-85% Satisfactory..86-952 Good Goal Achievement..96-1005 Exceeded Expectations) o Work programa(unit, Council Goals, project 6 routine%posted!) o Performance Indicators(Annual Report/monthly Reports/Budget?) o Productivity and team building (Weekly/unit 8 Monthly/piv.'.i) o Performance Evaluations (Timely, Current, Meaningful?) NIA o Personnel System Revisions o Computer Master Plan o Scholls Ferry Road/Murray Connection Plan o Greenburg Road Study i Tiedeman Signal o Community Recreation Plan o Utilities i Franchise Committee o Urban Services Policy Plan o Civic Center Project o Labor Negotiations o Intergovernmental Relations o Public Facilities Plan b CIP o Police Chief Recruitment i Assessment Center " 2. ESTABLISHED PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONS: (Circle) Needs, OK or Exceeds Imp'tovement Satisfactoty Expectations o Oral communications - X + o Written communications - X + o Leadership/initiative - X + o Problem solving/decision making - X + o Innovation/ingenuity/creativity - X + o Planning/organizing - X + o Interperbobal sensitivity - X + o Management control - X + a Adaptability/flexibility/stress tolerance - X + o Resource utilization/economy/cost control - X + o Tsamwrk/meeting participation - X + o Cosswulty-Relitiono' - --- 3t + o Intergovernmental Relations - >': "jr— .+ r o Public Police,Issues/Futurii Oriented - X + NOTES ON STRENGTHS ANO'WEAINESSES: _._ .. �..._...__ __.. _. ha OFFICE USE ONLY ;} EPR COMPLETED _. ,...._ .. PAF COMPLETED ...-. --.. .._NEXT REVIEW DATE'EPR RET DATE PAP PIF C. S. A G. DATE EPR PIF SIGNATURE r' J. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: I LI DATE SUBMITTED: February 14,__1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of Unified Sewerage Agency Street PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno��jj Dedication REQUESTED BY: Engineering r��.7?—" DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: - l CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY In December 1985, Unified Sewerage Agancy began to take the necessary steps to dispose of surplus property located on SW Burnham Street near Stevens Marine. The City Engineering Division requested that USA dedicate a portion of that property to the public for street right--of-way to SW Burhman Street. They did 3 agree to do this and the necessary documents are attached for your review. B ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Engineering recommends that Council accept this Street Dedication from U.S.A. RSC:bs129 ,CORPORATION STREET DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY dd—e5 ere yde icate to the Public. a .perpetual right-of-way for street, Koad and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along and within the following described real property in Washington County, Oregon: See Attached Exhibit A. To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the owner in fee simple and the property 1s free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their rights above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The amount paid for this dedication is $ Nnn-Mnnetarv- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned corporation has caused this Street Dedication to be executed by its duly authorised, undersigned officers acting pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors. Unified Sewerage Agency Name of Corporation By. y :L 1 CneManager Chairman, Board of Directors STATE OF OREGON ) ss. ` COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) February 3 , 1986 Personally appeared and Wes Mvlle„heck who. eac eing iret u q sworn, did eau tat t • ormer • M 1z a;AXpnR and that the latter is the Chairman, Board - --- of Directors. LSA _ Vamkid03lcof Unified Sewerage Agency , a� , and that t • seal affixed co the forego ng instrument-is the corporate i�sS-o�iid corporation and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors= and each of then acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. - C (Official Seal) f,,L�TiaGee Notary Public for Oregon j My Commission expires: /� /X ACCEPTANCE t�. �- a a (' l . . AFPro...d •o iese�hls-- v of �� a By. Y -.. q Attorney - y of Tig sd Approved as to legal description this -,e1��day of 19 4 By. Ci gar _ Sv Accepted bytheCity Council this 9 7 ''day ofQ�(Y/ CITY C CITY OFITIGARD,•OREGON _ ty,Recorder - City of Tigard i EXHIBIT "A" A strip of land located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, said strip being also a portion of that tract of land conveyed to the Tigard Sanitary District, a municipal corporation, by Deed Book 391 Page 193, said County Deed records; said strip being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of Lot 1, BURNHAM TRACTS, a recorded plat in said County, with the southwesterly line of SW Burnham Street (County Road No. 1319); thence on the southerly line of said Lot 1 South 63054' West 10.62 feet to a point that is 30 feet from the centerline (when measured at right angles) of said SW Burnham Street; thence parallel with the centerline of said Burnham Street North 45045' West 16.42 feet to the northwesterly line of said Tigard Sanitary District tract; thence on said northwesterly line North 44014' •East 10.00 feet to the southwesterly line of said Burnham Street; thence on said southwesterly line South 45®46' East 20.00 feet to the place of beginning. (RC:pm22) R l ter ``� m. -E CORNER OF TO 2S l 2AC R rY �r 'Y' N.E CORNER OF THE _ SOUTH 1/2 OF JOHN HICKLIN O.L.C.ST MOST PGt NORTHERLY CORNER OF BURNHAM .TRACT. 50 3� w o C 60n) ��► dna I iAc.opNJ z A 700 t67Ac. e+Wy: �y1 y 4 400 s w" 43Ac. � we 'a S l 011A0c $ SEE MAP 2S 12AB �►J 4`�0 �. CANCELLED 200 1702.1101 A.1,1900 2.Sit Ac. 2001,2100,2000, t '•GSC y34Ab qE '341 M63 y ��i_ • Or ot* SEE MAP 202 2S 12AD 2 !.26 Ac. o ti 100. 1.�•bE e 4.71 Ac. • �y r g 4 ° 203 °> 1.71 Ac. o q16 �J wo !E' o� Mg Ic �V 1 r C T C 1 . C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 20, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Quitclaim Approval For 99W Frontage Road PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson REQUESTED BY: Randy Clarno DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ./ U CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The 99W frontage road which is on the south side of Pacific Highway across from the intersection of Park 6 99W, has been an area of mutual concern between the State Highway Department and City of Tigard since 1976. This area has changed hands many times and the underlying fee title to the land has been difficult to determine. With the pending development of a shopping complex in that area, staff has received a street vacation request for the frontage road. After extensive research, staff finds it is necessary to request a quitclaim to the frontage road area. This property will give the State of Oregon ability to sell the strip of land between the frontage road and 99W to the developer after the street vacation is processed. Legal Counsel has reviewed and approved the quitclaim form and the process which staff is recommending. Council should be aware that a request will be presented in the near future for a Council initiated vacation in this area. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution to authorize execution of quitclaim deed. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to approve the attached resolution to authorize execution of quitclaim deed. ., lw/3585A QUITCLAIM DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, hereinafter called grantor, for the consideration here- release and quitclaim unto inafter stated, does hereby remiseh its Department of Tra:.sPor- the STATE OF OREGON, by and throug rantee, and unto tation, Highway Division, hereinafter called g , grantee' s heirs, successors and assigns all of tro property with the right, title and interest in that certain real p P Y appurtenances thereunto tenements, hereditaments bela :go,or and appur in anywise appertaining, situated in the Count of Washing State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: That certain real property situated in the George Richardson D.L.C. No. 38, Township 2 South, Range l West, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon, and being all that property described in that deed to the State of ough its State Highway Commission, Oregon, by and thr recorded in Book 332 , Page 421 of Washington County ded Book Records. ALSO that portion of that property described co those deeds to the State of Oregon recor de399 and in Book 146, Page 157 of in Book 148, Page Washington County Bookoande40rfeetysoutheasterly eofythe h of a line parallel wi Highway West, which center line of the relocated Pacific on ees, center line is referred to in said State of northwesterly excepting therefrom all that property lying of a northwesterly projection of the southwesterly line nd and of that tract of land as conveyed to RolaWashingtony Ingalls, recorded in Book 270, Page 455, County Deed Records . To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee' s heirs, successors and assigns forever. The true and actual consideration forthis the transfer stattual ion in terms of dollars, is $0.00. Hoerteror,value given or promised consists of or includes other property which is the whole consideration. In construing this deed and where the context sochanges requires, the singular includes the plural and all gr be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. In Witness Whereof, the grantor has executed this instrument this 26th day of February, 1986; by and through its Mayor and duly authorized by Resolution No. 86- �'7 of the City Recorder, y of Tigard, passed the 24th day of City Council of the City February, 1986. y 1 DEED QUITCLAIM 3 THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY PARTICULAR USE MAY BE MADE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. A BUYER SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. J r - City of Tigard c City Recorder - City of Tigard STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) Personall appeared -� Z and who, being duly sworn, each for himself and not one for the other, did say that the former is the Mayor and that the latter is the City Recorder of the City of Tigard, Oregon, a municipal corporation, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Tigard by authority of the City Council; and each of them acknowledged said instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before me: - Notary Public for Oregon (NOTARIAL SEAL) My Commission expires: Grantor's Name and Address: City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Grantee' s Name and Address: State of Oregon - Department of Transportation Highway Division 140 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97310 After Recording, Return to: State of Oregon, Dept. of Transportation Highway hwa Division 140 Transportation Building, Salem, OR 97310 z , Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: State of Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Highway Division 140 Transportation Building Salem, OR 97310 2 — QUITCLAIM DE® j CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 24, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0: ( �' r DATE SUBMITTED: February 20, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Accept and Authorize Signatures on Washington County Road Improvement Design PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno Standards Memorandum of Understanding REQUESTED BY: Engineering Division DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: (JAW __. CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Over the past 18 months, the County has worked with Cities, Utility Companies, Economic Development Committees, private developers (Engineers) and other interested parties to develop uniform road design standards for use on County controlled roads. 2. Said standards have now been developed and generally accepted by all affected parties. County now desires that cities within the County enter into a "Memorandum of Understanding" on the use of these standards. 3. By accepting this "memorandum", cities basically agree not to object on the basis of uniform design standards, to the transfer of jurisdiction, to the City.- of roads which meet said standards. Cities also agree to initiate proceedings to consider adoption of said standards so as to reach a decision thereon within one year. 4. City Engineering Staff, including Interim City Engineer Bob Wright has reviewed said standards in detail and feel they are acceptable. It should be noted that these are design standards and have no effect on the determination of "Road Classification". 5. The City's current design standards are outdated and will be updated this year when the new City Engineer is aboard. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED y SUGGESTED ACTION 4 -" Engineering and the Interim City Engineer recommend that Council authorize signatures accepting this "Memorandum of Understanding" as these design standards have no negative impact on the City's position relative to road jurisdiction or uniform road improvement design standards. { _ (3585A) x, ; R.A. Wright Engineerin g, Inc. Portland1340 SW Bertha Blvd. Oregon 97219 Cconsulting engineers 503/246-4293 l File: 940.10 October 9, 1985 Mr. Randy Claro Engineering Services Manager City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Randy: Specifications for Roads I have reviewed the proposed "Standard Engineering Design and Construction Specifications for Roads" as prepared by the (� Washington County engineering staff and find it to be a useful document. I suggest that the City of Tigard adopt and endorse the use of this document in its present form and be, prepared to recommend revisions after it has been used for a year or two. Sincere y, Robert A. W ig Interim City Engineer RAW: jg 410.91 is If z: ,lR. mum AdW Memorandum of Understanding This Agreement is entered into this day of , 1986, by and between Washington County, a home rule political subdivision of the State of Oregon and an incorporated City. Whereas: 1. It is necessary to establish and implement modern engineering design standards for road improvements to protect the public and meet transportation needs for the year 2000; 2. Uniform design standards for roads in both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the County will meet those goals in the most efficient and effective manner ; 3. County, through the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee, has developed acceptable standards in conjunction with City, private developers, the Tualatin Valley Economic Development Commission, utilities, and other interested parties; 4 . Said standards are set forth in the Document entitled "Washington County Uniform Road Improvement Design Standards" , final draft dated January 29, 1986, and by this reference incorporated herein as Exhibit "A Now, therefore, the respective parties agree that: 1. City has reviewed said standards, endorses them and recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt them; Memorandum of Understanding - Page 2 2. County promptly will initiate proceedings to consider adopt' in of said standards by the Board of County Commissior .s and will furnish the City with a set of the adoptP . standards; 3. City will not object on the basis of uniform d sign standards, to the transfer of jurisdiction, to the c. ty, of roads which meet said standards specified in Exhibit 'A" 4. City promptly will initiate proceedings to consider adoption of said standards so as to reach a-'decision thereon within one year of the date County adopts said standards. City expresses its current intent to act favorably tt on adoption. This Agreement contains the full and complete agreement of the parties and may be modified only upon the mutual written consent of the parties. Washington County Citi Board of Commissioners 0209d/1-2 j r r-_ 70-Fro %H a as N N H C4 _ O to �+ H W 03dgo co � H H H N N ca N 04 +moi' 14 cn G � � r+ jitaxi x N iJJ f�77 H to aww w .4 to _pip es O 04 0 ti t+ ,.4 a w en +► Aj 41 C4 In ra O N go m .-r W Gl W t11 tom+ a ro a �4 � � cn �m �� � in v :o in rw co *+ 04 c� a G w ap ps C" .0 Va V V ~0 1 'o C" 04 QN b a 4by Uca 0I r4 . cow c a Ell .a 60 H CNT v N (A t~7 � V *14_ � V 1"4 � b O o �0 1A x � a► 3 ' ..t roil + N O+ 'o r4N 14.O d. eV r E "�- '�`;";°�T�.Y�.+-...,� �v. �'`_ 'i".: � �'_.��,ta.sYK w5 F^* 1 '�' 7 .xa�>r`..x,.�i^ae�' �YnS.•tir_ ,.k*�:�:r: