The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 02/10/1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FEBRUARY 10, 1986, 7:00 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 10865 SW WALNUT asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-•Agenda Items: Motion to approve as amended. 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. ORDINANCE NO. 86- HOUSEKEEPING ZOA ORDINANCE o Community Development Staff 4 ORDINANCE NO. 86- NARK FEE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE o Community Development Staff 5. ORDINANCE NO. 86- AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 8.46, TO TITLE 8 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE. o Acting Chief Jennings 6. PUBLIC HEARING- CONDITIONAL USE CU 5-85, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 4-85, 6 VARIANCE V 18-85 - NEAL CONGER/WILLAMINA LUMBER COMPANY - NPO #6 An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to establish a 90,000 square foot mini-warehouse facility and to vary the required number of parking spaces from 93 to 4. Property is designated Commercial General and is zoned CG PD (Commercial General/Planned Development). Location: 15700 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 1800). a Public Hearing Opened - Motion to continue to 3/17/86 7. TAX BASE MEASURE - RESOLUTION NO. 86-___-_ o City Administrator 8. LIBRARY DISTRICT DISCUSSION o Head Librarian 9. MURRAY ROAD CONNECTION DISCUSSION o City Administrator 10. CONSENT" AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 10.1 Approve Council Minutes - January 20, 1986 10.2 Receive and File: o Monthly Departmental Reports - December, 1985 o Community Development Land Use Decisions 10.3 Accept Public Improvements - Gentle Woods Subdivision - Res. 86-15 10.4 Accept Public Improvements - Picks Landing #2 Subd. - Res. 86-16 10.5 Accept Public Improvements - SW 114th Court - Resolution No. 86-17 10.6 Accept Sewer Easements - A-{`fart Summerlake No. 2 10.7 Accept Drainage Easement - Walnut Place (Davidson Site) COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 10, 1986 - PAGE 1 10.8 Adopt Historic District Fees - Resolution No. 86-18 10.9 Approve WCCLS Service Contract and WCCLS Automation Contract 10.10 Approve Forwarding to OLCC Applications For Liquor Sales: fRenewal Applications o The Manilla Express, 12370 SW Main, DA Application o Sherwood Inn Restaurant, 15700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , DA App a Albertsons, Inc. , 12060 SW Main, PS Application o Newport Bay Seafood Broiler, 10935 SW 69th, DA Application o Tigard Thriftway, 14365 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Jackpot Food Mart, 15900 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , PS App. o Hi Hat Restaurant, 11530 SW Pacific Hwy. , DA Application o Willowbrook Restaurant, 11525 SW Durham Rd. , R Application o Colonial Texaco, 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application a Coco's Famous Hamburgers, 10900 SW 69th, R Application a Bannings Restaurant, 11477 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Safeway Store, 250 Tigard Shopping Plaza, PS Application o Plaid Pantry 424, 11006 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Plaid Pantry 1163, 11545 SW Durham Road, PS Application o Plaid Pantry #19, 15485 SW Hall Blvd. , PS Application o Plaid Pantry 11149, 11705 SW Pacific Hwy. , Suite A, PS App. o Pietro's Gold Coast Pizza, 13405 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Round Table Pizza, 11940 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Fred Meyer, Inc. , 11665 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application a Fred Meyer, Inc./Eve's Restaurant, 11565 SW Pacific Hwy. , R App. o Payless Drug Stores NW, 12080 SW Main Street, PS Application o L'Ecurie, 12386 SW Main, Dispenser C Application Change Of Ownership o Swift Mart #117, 9800 SW Shady Lane, PS Application (with change of ownership store is to be called Star Market 10.11 Approve Windsor Place Subdivision Partial Bond Release - Resolution No. 86-19 - $155,335.96 11. NON--AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d) to discuss pending/ current litigation issues. 13. ADJOURNMENT" lw/3666A i COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 10, 1986 - PAGE 2 _w T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — FEBRUARY 10, 1986 — 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian (arrived at 7:06 PM), and Jerry Edwards; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator requested the following be cons .dored: .1 Economic Development Committee Appointment 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Mr. Gordon Martin, 12265 SW 72nd Avenue, presented a proposed transportation plan for the Tigard Triangle area and submitted a map and written description. Fie stated the current Dartmouth Street LID and 99W intersection would not give an acceptable level of service by the year 2000. He suggested Council direct staff to work with Ed Hart from ODOT and work to meet the regional transportation needs for the area. b. City Administrator stated the Transportation Committee and NPO for the area have seen the material and have received and filed the information. He noted the Council directed a traffic study for the area last fall and that information has not yet been received. However, staff is working with Ed Hart to look at the local and regional transportation needs in the area. ODOT, to date, has not indicated to staff any approval of the proposed plan. City Administrator advised Council that the transportation element of the Comp Plan remains intact to date and would require a camp plan amendment to change the transportation plan for the Triangle area. 4. ORDINANCE NO. "-081 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 18,146.010, 18.146.020, 18.146.050, 18.100.110(C), 18.66.030, 18.144.020, 18,60.040(b), 18.62,030(i)(E), 18.64.030(1)(E), 18.66.030(1)(E), 18.68.030(1)(8), 18.70.030(1)(C), 18.72.030(1)(D),18.104, 18.80.015(c), 18.84.040(x), 18.114.130(c)(2)(A) OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND POLICY 7.1.2x.2. OF THE FINDINGS POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES DOCUMENT (ZOA 5-85) a, Associate Planner Newton noted Council heard this issue at the 1/13/86 Council meeting and requested adoption of findings. b. Legal Counsel recommended typographical error on last page be corrected. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt with typographical error corrected. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 10, 1986 Sam i 5. PARK FEE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE e� a. Associate Planner Newton asked for Council direction regarding the proposed park use fees. She outlined the recommendations by staff and the Park Board. It was noted the objective of the fee change was to make the park available to more people. b. After lengthy discussion, Councilor Brian moved, Councilor Edwards seconded, to direct staff to prepare the necessary documents to have the park reserved for 4 hour increments, with no deposit required and new rates as follows: Group I Groups II & III 5-Hour Increments at: Covered Area Soccer and Ballfields Groups up to 50 No charge $20.00 $10.00 51 to 100 No charge $30.00 $10.00 101 to 150 No charge $40.00 $10.00 151 to 250 No charge $50.00 $10.00 251 + No charge $60.00 $10.00 Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 6. ORDINANCE NO. 86--09 AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 8.46, TO TITLE 8 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE. a, Acting Chief of Police Jennings recommended approval as livestock at large is currently creating problems of enforcement for the Police Department. b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. PUBLIC IWIVEM - Ci0_ IT3D11A� USE CU 5-85, "LAMMED DEVELOPMENT PD 4-85, & VARIANCE V 18-85 - NEAL CONSER/WILLAMINA LUMBER COMPANY - NPO #6 An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval to establish a 90,000 square foot mini-warehouse facility and to vary the required number of parking spaces from 93 to 4. Property is designated Commercial General and is zoned CG PD (Commercial General/Planned Development) . Location: 15700 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2$1 10D, Tax Lot 1800). a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to continue to 3/17/86 at the request of appellant. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 8. TAX BASE MEASURE a. City Administrator state that the Budget Committee unanimously recommended a tax base measure of $1.7 million be sent to the F voters at the 5/20186 election. Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 10, 1986 b. RESOLUTION NO. 86-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CALLING FOR AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 1986 IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE-WIDE PRIMARY ELECTION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE REGISTERED QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD THE QUESTION OF ESTABLISHING A NEW TAX BASE FOR THE CITY. C. Motion, by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve. d. Councilor Brian stated the city survey has indicated citizen support for maintaining service levels and the $1.7 million tax base would do that for approximately 5 years. He noted the Budget Committee worked very diligently to arrive at a recommendation. He further indicated the Council should make a pledge to the citizens that the tax base would last the 5 years as recommended. e. Councilor Edwards said he supported the Budget Committee recommendation and stated the current tax base has gone 2 years beyond what was promised at the time it was approved. He encouraged support of the new tax base to continue current service levels. f. Mayor Cook noted that population increase and inflation have occurred and the City has worked hard to stay within the tax base 2 years beyond what was promised at the last election. He encouraged citizens to vote in support of the tax base measure in May. f ` g. City Administrator a $1.7 million tax base would be about $5.00/month to the average priced home in Tigard. Motion to approve the tax base resolution was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 9. LIBRARY DISTRICT DISCUSSION a. City Administrator noted that the County Commission has expressed the desire to not have WCCLS funding through the County tax base or levies. The Library Board has suggested that a Library District not be formed too quickly, and City Managers in the County are concerned about the double taxation issues if a district were formed. b. After lengthy discussion by Council, consensus was to have the Mayor send a letter to the County Commissioners requesting a Library District not be formed now, and encour, _ them to continue funding WCCLS for at least 1 more year. Further to encourage the County to seek necessary state legislative changes to address the possible double-taxation issues. 10. MURRAY ROAD CONNECTION DISCUSSION a. City Administrator stated he discussed various options for the Murray Road alignment with the Beaverton Mayor. This item will be discussed at the joint Beaverton/Tigard Council Meeting scheduled for 6:30 PM on Thursday, 2/13/86. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 10, 1986 11. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 11.1 Approve Council Minutes - January 20, 1986 11.2 Receive and File: o Monthly Departmental Reports - December, 1985 o Community Development Land Use Decisions 11.3 Accept Public Improvements - Gentle Woods Subdivision - Res. 86-15 11.4 Accept Public Improvements - Picks Landing #2 Subd• - Res. 86-16 11.5 Accept Public Improvements - SW 114th Court - Resolution No. 86-17 11.6 Accept Sewer Easements - A-Mart Summerlake No. 2 11.7 Accept Drainage Easement - Walnut Place (Davidson Site) 11.8 Adopt Historic District Fees - ResoiuLiwn NO. 86-18 11.9 Approve WCCLS Service Contract and WCCLS Automation Contract 11.10 Approve Forwarding to OLCC Applications For Liquor Sales: Renewal Applications o The Manilla Express, 12370 SW Main, DA Application o Sherwood Inn Restaurant, 15700 SW Upper Booncs Ferry Rd. , DA App o Albertsons, Inc. , 12060 SW Main, PS Application Application o Newport Bay Seafood Broiler, 10935 SW 69th, DA App o Tigard Thriftway, 14365 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Jackpot Food Mart, 15900 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , PS App. o Hi Hat Restaurant, 11530 SW Pacific Hwy. , DA Application o Willowbrook Restaurant, 11525 SW Durham Rd. , R Application o Colonial Texaco, 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Coco's Famous Hamburgers, 10900 SW 69th, R Application o Bannings Restaurant, 11477 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Safeway Store, 250 Tigard Shopping Plaza, PS Application o Plaid Pantry 024, 11006 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Plaid Pantry #63, 11545 SW Durham Road, PS Application o Plaid Pantry #19, 15485 SW Hall Blvd. , PS Application o Plaid Pantry #149, 11705 SW Pacific Hwy. , Suite A, PS App. o Pietro's Gold Coast Pizza, 13405 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Round Table Pizza, 11940 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Fred Meyer, Inc. , 11665 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Fred Meyer, inc./Eve's Restaurant, 11565 SW Pacific Hwy. , R APP• o Payless Drug Stores NW, 12080 SW Main Street, PS Application o L'Ecurie, 12386 SW Main, Dispenser C Application Change Of Ownership o Swift Mart #17, 9800 SW Shady Lane, PS Application (with change of ownership store is to be called Star Market 11.11 Approve Windsor Place Subdivision Partial Bond Release Resolution No. 86-19 - $155,335.96 a. Mayor Cook requested staff amend the SDR 1-86 Director's Decision to require the driveway be developed so that vehicles don't high-center when entering. b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve consent agenda with the requirement that the SDR 1-86 Community Development Land Use Action be amended pursuant to Council discussion. _ Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 10, 1996 c. Councilor Edwards suggested the Tigard Economic Development Committee minutes of 1/21/86 could be amended to note the monies �.. to fund the proposed first year cash grant from the City for downtown development would be NON—TAX dollars. 12. NON—AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 12.1 Economic Development Committee Appointment a. City Administrator stated that after 2 months of advertising, the City has only received one application for consideration for the vacancy. Me recommended Juanita C. Caday would be an appropriate candidate if Council wished to appoint her. b. After discussion, Councilor Brian moved to appoint Juanita C. Caday. Motion seconded by Councilor Edwards. Approved by unanimous vote of -ouncil present. C. Staff will prepare necessary resolution for next agenda. 12.2 Joint Beaverton/Tigard Council Meeting a. Mayor Cook noted this meeting would be held at 6:30 PM on 2/13/86 at Rose's Restaurant in Beaverton. 12.3 Auditor Meeting a. Mayor Cook stated he would be having a meeting with the City Auditor on Wednesday, 2/12/86. If any Council member had areas of concern to be discussion, they were encouraged to advise the Mayor. 12.4 Council Candidate Information Meeting a. City Administrator advised Council that the Council candidates would be invited to City Hall for a brown bag lunch with department heads to ask questions and received information for their campaigns. This luncheon will be held within the next two weeks. RECESS: Regular Session: 8:07 P.M. 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 8:25 P.M. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d) to discuss pending/ current litigation issues. 14. ADJOURNMENT: 9:08 P.M. Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST- r — City of Tigard LW/3686A Page 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 10, 1986 1 i I TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6605 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684.0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 z Legal Notice Advertising • City of Tigard • O Tearsheet Notice 19,96 3 ; P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 • 0 Duplicate Affidavit OF �'GARD � • CQJ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' or ' Stephanie Neubauer lip the being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising &Y 10, 1£168 at 7:00 P3L at Pouter Director, or his principal clerk,of the T1gard T;m e G Jar Rio School Lectum_Rg0l1i.a a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 20683 9W Walnut Streg4'11T ird, � and 193.020; published at Tigard in the P ',tit.tttaY ' aforesaid county anc� state that the W:ol>aafaerl fkaat`tbe Public Hearing totice _ et 13733 S1 A� Asn'at . a printed copy of which Is hereto annexed,was published in the 9 by 4171. entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and � USE C1J consecutive in the following issues: 'VAMANO Jan 30 , 19 8 6 — n>f$etgn's s�raval,t4 a Jn clltty ead to vwy w fired, Subscribed an to before me this Tan -A() i 2Fi tiAif � � Notary Public for Oregon Commission Expires: 8 8 t MyC s: 2 0 P .��. AFFIDAVIT f I TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6610 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0380 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising s City of Tigard a O Tearsheet Notice P.O. Box 23397 a 0 Duplicate Affidavit F - Cfijy ® a Tigard, OR 97223 1986 a i �yl Ti`i OF T'ORRD AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' 1,�3�,Y,�pn3 p Neubauer _ being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theS.i.�eix T'-a—m�- a newspaper of general circulation asdefined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at T i g a r d in the aforesaid county and state;that the City Council Regular Meeting a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and consecutive in the following issues: Feb 6 , 1986 Subscribed sw to before me this Feb 6 - 1986 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 9/20/88 AFFIDAVIT so V6 FF t r �+ DATE wLrgfaz w X; }�•�c�'� .1Re4 yy 5 Y CT1Y OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF PO5IING In Che Matter Of the Proposed Ordinance ado tion of 2 10 86 STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss City of Tigard ) I, Loreen R. Wilson being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) 36--08 & 86-09 which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated February 10, 19x36 copy(s) of said ordinances) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 14 day of February 1, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash Avenue, Tigard, OR 2• Tigard Police Department, 9020 SW Burnham, Tigard, OR. 3. Tigard Public Library, 12568 SW Main, Tigard, OR. c� Subscribed and sworn to before me this ay of 1986. t �.-+------ �`+:;�':..4••••• Notary Public for Oregon `"a • :� My Commission Expires: 2-mac? s •J to !_ 'rry f :q N o..,,�..�..«.......w.....rz:..nR..•..�,..,...w-..P.e�.a...—..-. m-,v.P..�e..-...-v..r.-.._.:._..�-.y.,.....+..,.�r..-.-..+-..'•.:•vwn.r.....w+w.a�ee. - .. - _ .. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86 18,146.050 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 18.146'8 610.040(b)6 020 8.62.030(1}(E}, 18.100.110(0), 18.66.030, 18.144.020, 18.70.030(1)(0), 18.64.030(1)(E), 18.66.030(1)(E), 18.68.030(1)(8), 18.72.030(1)(D),18.104, 18.80.015(c), 18.84.040(a), 18.114.130(c)(2)(A) OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND POLICY 7.1.2a,2. OF THE FINDINGS POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES DOCUMENT (ZOA 5-85) WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has reviewed the Community Development Code and has adopted the same; and WHEREAS, The City of Tigard Planning Commission held public hearings on the proposed changes on December 3, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed changes on January 13, 1986 THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Community Development Code shall be amended as shown in Exhibit "A" attached. Language to be added is UNDERLINED. Language to be deleted is shown in [BRACKETS]. SECTION 2: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By U 1C—L?)i rnalrs vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 1 a 7`h day of /=- 1986 eR. oreen Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This 07"" day ofe ru�� E _. 1986. �oi 11 k, Mayor (2346P) ORDINANCE NO. 86—C g Page 1 EXHIBIT "A" A 18.146 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPED LOTS [18.146.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to provide for the reduction of the front, rear and corner side yard setback area where such a reduction is necessary to enlarge an existing single family residential dwelling.] 18.146.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to provide for the reduction of Yard setback areas where a reduction is necessary to enlarge an existing structure. [18.146.020 Applicability The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts.) 18.146.020 Applicability The provisions of this chapter shall apply to additions to existing buildings in all zoning districts. [18.146.050 Approv:*l Criteria (a) The front, rear or corner side yard setback areas may be reduced to 15 feet provided the following standards are satisfied: (1) The reduction of the setback area established by the applicable zoning district shall be necessary to allow for the enlargement or remodeling of an existing single family residential dwelling; (2) The garage shall satisfy the setback requirements of the applicable zoning district; (3) The standards of Chapter 18.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) shall be satisfied; (4) The maximum lot coverage shall not exceed the maximum lot coverage of the base zone; and (5) The rear property line shall be landscaped with site obscuring plantings in accordance with the standards set forth in 18.100 (LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING) .] ORDINANCE NO. 86-09' Page 2 18.146.050 Approval Criteria The front rear,_ side and corner yard and through lot setback requirements in the applicable zone may be reduced up to 20 percent provided the following standards are satisfied: ill The reduction of the setback area established by the applicable zoning district shall be necessary to allow for the enlargement or remodeling of an exist M building. The garage setback to the front property line shall satisfy the requirements of the applicable zoning district• The standards of Chapter 18.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) shall be satisfied; The resulting lot coverage shall not exceed the maximum lot coverage of the base zone; The proposed addition shall not encroach upon any existing easements; When the proposed addition is within the rear yard, the adiacent to the rear property line shall ba landscaped with sight obscurinq plantings in accordance with the standards st forth in 18.100.080 (LANDSCAPING_AND SCREENING); and Setback buffering and screening requirements that apply when commercial and industrial zones abut a residential zone shall be satisfied. 18.100. 110 E(c) Screening of Swimming Pools. All swimming pools shall be enclosed with a 4-112 foot fence surrounding the pool when the pool is greater than 18 inches deep. Fences shall have a self-latching gate.] LCI Screening of Swimming Pools All swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by Chapter 14.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code. 18.66.030 (1) Civic Use Types Religious Assembly ORDINANCE NO. 86-QZ Page:3 18.144.020 Definition Accessory structure means a subordinate structure located on the lot, the u3a of which is clearly incidental to and associated with the principal structure. Where an accessory structure is attached to the principal structure, in a substantial manner, as by a roof, such accessory structure shall be considered as a part of the principal structure. Examples of accessory structures are barns, garages, carports, playhouses, sheds, [kennels for domestic animals], private greenhouses, gazebos, storage buildings, boat houses and docks, wind generating devices, swimming pool pump houses, and radio and television receiving antenna towers and dishes. .18.60.040 (6) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.62.030 (1)(E) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.64.030(i)(E) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.66.030 (1)(E) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.68.030_(1)(B) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.70.030 (1)(B) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.72.030(1)(0) [Parking Services] Parking Facilities 18.32.120(a)(1)(8) All owners of record within 250 [100] feet of the property; [18.104 FUEL TANK INSTALLATIONS (a) ill above ground fuel tank installations are prohibited. (b) Underground fuel tanks may be installed in all districts provided: ORDINANCE NO: 86— Page 4 (1) An application for a Conditional Use Permit shall be approved by the Hearings Officer in accordance with Section 18.32.160 prior to installation. i (2) Application for a Conditional Use Permit shall be accompanied by a signed, approved document from the applicable fire district.] 18.104 FUEL TANK INSTALLATIONS 18.104.010 Purpose ' The purpose of these regulations is to guide the installation of stationary fuel tanks within the City limits in residential commercial and industrial Zones. E 18.104.020 Definitions E s l Tank shall mean a vessel containing more than 60 U.S. gallons. LbI Container shall mean any can, bucket, barrel, drum or portable tank (except stationary tanks), tank vehicles and tank cans. 3 Fuel shall mean kerosene or any hydrocarbon oil or liquified petroleum gas conforming to nationally recognized standards. Hydrocarbon oils shall have a flash point of not less than t 100° F. , 18.104.030 Applicability The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all new and existing development in all zoning districts. These provisions shall not apply to non-standard fuel containers. e 18.104.040 Requirements (a) All stationary containers tanks, equipment and apparatus used or intended to be used for the storage, handling, use or sale of flammable or combustible liquids or fuels shall be of an approved type as per the Uniform Fire Code. Small tanks or containers with capacities of 60 U.S. gallons or less used or intended to be used for the above-ground storage of residential or home heating fuels are permitted in all districts when they conform to the standards and requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and local fire district requirements. (c) Installation of all fuel tanks with capacities greater than 60 U.S. gallons shall be prohibited above-ground in all districts. ORDINANCE NO. 86-1:2?g Page'5 Specific concerns of tank placement on a site with respect to topographical conditions, barricades walls building exits proximity to buildings or adiacent properties tank construction and storage permits for Class I, II and III liquids shall be addressed prior to the time of building code permit approval and site development review, (where applicable), and shall conform to all requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and the applicable fire district. 18.80.015 The Process (c) The Planned Development Overlay Zone shall be processed in the same manner as a zone change under the provision of Section 18.32, Administrative Procedures except in the situation where zone change is part of a legislative rezoning. In the case of an existing Planned Development overlav zone for a subdivision, conditional use or site development review application the proposal shall be reviewed by thePlanninq Commission. In the case of an existing Planned Development overlav zone for any other type of application, the application shall be reviewed under the Provisions required in the chapters which apply to the Particular land use application. 18.84.040(a)(5) The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan; unless the construction of r said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as timely, 18.84.040(a) 7. The land within the 100 -year flood plain boundary shall be dedicated to the public. 16.114.130(c)(2)(A) [Allowable Area. Wall signs, including illuminated reader boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15% of the building frontage occupied by the tenant]. 18.114.130(c)(2)(A) Allowable Area. Wall signs, including illuminated reader boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 25% of the total area of the wall face upon which the sign is attached. Volume Two Findings Policies and Implementation Strategies. 7.1.2.a.2 [PUBLIC SEWER (NEW DEVELOPMENT ON SEPTIC TANKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY); AND] PUBLIC SEWER SHALL BE RMIRED FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY UNLESS THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS OVER 300 FEET FROM A SEWER LINE AND WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FOR A PRIVATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS OBTAINED AMD: (2346P) ORDINANCE NO. 86— Page 6 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANQE NO. 86- OON AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 8.46, TO- TITLE 8 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, livestock roaming at large pose both a nuisance and hazard to property owners, pedestrians, and vehicular traffic, and WHEREAS, the Tigard Municipal Code contains no prohibition against allowing livestock to be at large, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: TMC Title No. 8 shall be amended by adding Chapter 8.46, LIVESTOCK AT LARGE. Section 2: Chapter 8.46 of the TMC shall read: "Chapter 8.46 LIVESTOCK AT LARGE 1 Sections: 8.46.010 Permit 8.46.020 At Large 8.46.030 Violation 8.46.040 Penalty 8.46.010 Permit. As used in this ordinance, "permit" shall include human conduct in relation to an owned animal which is intentional, deliberate, careless, inadvertent, or negligent. 8.46.020 At Large. As used in this chapter, "At large" means off or outside the premises of the owner, not restrained by a rope, line, leash, chain or other similar means, or not under the immediate control, restraint, or command of an owner thereof. 8.46. 030 Violation. It shall be a violation of this ordinance to permit livestock, as defined in TMC 8. 08.110, to be at large. 8. 46. 040 Penal. The penalty for violation of this ordinance shall be in accordance with TMC Chapter 8.48. " ORDINANCE NO. 86- O� Page 1 Section 3: That this ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By (Jhanima(j-s vote of all Council members 1686. present on the l(Z7Y` day of T=om �, • y Recorder - City of Tigar APPROVED: This /OW? day of ( rt. , p : 1986. fybr - City of Tigard r/ i ORDINANCE NO. 86-0c) Page 2 jAGENDA ITEM !/ _ — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE Q 1 (Limited to 2 minutes or less. please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda. but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME 6 ADDRESS TOPICSTAFF CONTACTED t` Put C� ✓'�< C r- vw,+L ! I u DATE G I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please prJyinft theinformation) � / Item Description: ' ect 7) L �3 Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation #,tlt##1kik*#1t######ilrit######�t####!E�*#Aarlt4tr�trlht►1Hr+klA###!k#ink##�t�k#######ltfk#!F######A##### Gordon S. Martin 12265 S.W. 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 /O _ February 10, 1986 HAND DELIVERED Mayor and City Council City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed transportation plan for the Tigard Triangle and surrounding region Honorable Mayor and City Council: In the past month I have presented to the Tigard transportation committee, City of Tigard Staff, and NPO #4 a regional transportation plan that was developed with the assistance of Tom Schwab, the Transportation Analysis Manager for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). This plan will help alleviate traffic problems on Pacific Highway (99W), and provide an optimum traffic circulation system,for the Tigard Triangle. I would like to summarize the merits of this proposal and reinforce the concerns I have pertaining to the development of the Tigard Triangle transportation system. A State funded regional transportation project that incorporates the local transportation needs of the Tigard Triangle would be far superior to a local only transportation project in the Triangle. Edward Hardt, Metro Region Engineer for ODOT, has reviewed this transportation plan and has stated that it has merit and should be considered. In Edward Hardt's letter to Robert Jean dated September 4, 1985, he recommends that the following two major areas need to be addressed in the development of a transportation plan for this region: (1) consideration of major north/south and/or east/west transportation spines, and (2) identify necessary improvements to the major state highways to serve the Triangle area. The letter also extended an invitation to the City of Tigard to meet with ODOT for the purposes of developing an internal traffic circulation system for the Tigard Triangle which would be incorporated into a plan that addresses regional transportation requirements. Due to the recent developments regarding the possibility of a regional transportation project, more than 50% of the property ownership in the Dartmouth L.I.D. district desire a regional approach in developing the traffic circulation system for the Tigard Triangle. Therefore, it seems reasonable for the City of Tigard to support property owners by encouraging ODOT to further investi6l- to and implement a regional transportation plan such as the one I have presented to the City of Tigard Staff. . Mayor and City Council February 10, 1986 Page 2 The traffic study conducted by Wayne Kittelson, traffic engineer consultant for CH2M Hill, concluded that the road system currently proposed to serve the Tigard Triangle area by the Dartmouth L.I.D. will not be adequate to accommodate the expected Year 2005 p.m. peak hour traffic demands. Specifically, the partial buildout scenario that was investigated in the traffic analysis found that the proposed Dartmouth Drive/Pacific Highway intersection will operate at an unacceptable "F" level of service during the Year 2005 p.m. peak hour. Tom Schwab has reviewed the analysis procedure and conclusions of this traffic study and concurs with its findings. Edward Hardt also concurs with the conclusions drawn from the study. The twenty year analysis period required by ODOT is to ensure that all new transportation improvements connecting to State facilities have an acceptable service life of at least 20 years. According to the traffic engineering report, the Dartmouth L.I.D. design for the Dartmouth Drive/Pacific Highway intersection will experience operational problems before the Year 2000, and will have a volume/capacity ratio of 2.01 in the Year 2005, which is more than 100% over capacity. Although S.W. 69th and 72nd Avenues already have connections to Pacific Highway, they will also experience operational problems before the Year 2000. Pacific Highway is the most important consideration in developing a workable transportation plan for the Tigard Triangle and surrounding region. The traffic study indicates that under the currently planned roadway configuration, 60% of all future inbound and outbound vehicle trip ends associated with the Tigard Triangle area will be oriented toward Pacific Highway. The Year 2005 vehicle trip projections are based on a 55% buildout estimate of the Triangle. The actual vehicle count translates Into approximately 4,140 total vehicles traveling out of the Triangle onto Pacific Highway, and 3,300 vehicles traveling from Pacific Highway into the Triangle during the p.m. peak hour. In the traffic study, 2,480 (1/3 of the total) vehicles were assigned to the Dartmouth Drive/Pacific Highway intersection. Any acceptable transportation plan for the Tigard Triangle and surrounding region must address capacity level traffic demand on Pacific Highway. Pacific Highway Is currently operating near capacity levels, therefore, it will be Impossible to maintain an acceptable level of service on it if any large traffic volumes are added to It from the Tigard Triangle. For any plan to work it must reduce the projected Tigard Triangle traffic demand and through traffic volumes on Pacific Highway. Traffic demand on Pacific Highway can be reduced with two major road improvements: (1) The construction of a major overpass/interchange with Highway 217 approximately 1,600 feet south of Pacific Highway. (2) The construction of a major east/west arterial from I-5 at the Hains exit to Hall Boulevard at McDonald street. A major overpass/interchange reduces Triangle traffic demand on Pacific Highway by providing a direct route to and from Highway 217 for Triangle traffic that would normally require travel on Pacific Highway to access Highway 217 or the Triangle. A major east/west arterial reduces Triangle traffic demand and through traffic volumes on Pacific Highway by providing an alternate route for Triangle traffic in route to and from southwest Tigard and Pacific Highway through traffic . Mayor and City Council February 10, 1986 Page 3 The Development of a internal traffic circulation system for the Tigard Triangle in conjunction with addressing regional transportation requirements is a very difficult and involved process. Construction of a stub-road and ramp connection to Highway 217 off the currently proposed Dartmouth L.I.D. and/or limiting buildout of the Tigard Triangle to 45%, is a short term approach to the Triangle's transportation problems. The goal should be to concentrate on developing a transportation plan that will adequately service the traffic generated by a 100% Triangle buildout. This goal would require a regional approach in developing the Triangle's traffic circulation system. On February 27, 1986, a hearing will be conducted by ODOT for the purpose of updating the Six Year Highway Improvement Program. If a regional transportation plan that incorporates the local traffic needs of the Tigard Triangle is not presented at this hearing, the opportunity for essential State funding may be lost for another 3 years. It is evident that a over with Highway 217 and a major east/west arterial from I-5 to southwest Tigard will be necessary to provide an optimum level of service on Pacific Highway in addition to acceptable access to the Tigard Triangle area. However, without ODOT and State funding, the cost associated with a regional transportation project will be prohibitive, and necessary right-of-way west of Highway 217 may be lost which further prevents the possibility of implementing a regional transportation project. The construction of a local road design such as the Dartmouth L.I.D., will eliminate the possibility of ODOT involvement in helping to solve the Triangle's local transportation problems. A long term comprehensive transportation plan for the Tigard Triangle and surrounding region will never take place unless the local needs of the Triangle are incorporated into a regional transportation plan that ODOT may be willing to implement. One of the ten major goals of the City of Tigard is the development of the Tigard Triangle Transportation system. It seems reasonable for the City to contact ODOT as soon as possible in order to pursue a regional transportation plan that provides for the local traffic needs of the Triangle. Support from the City of Tigard at the February 27, 1986, public hearing is imperative to the acceptance of a transportation plan into the Six Year Highway Improvement Program. The City of Tigard has everything to gain if a transportation plan Is accepted into the program, but if the possibility of State involvement'is lost, the transportation options and development potential of the Tigard Triangle will be greatly limited. Very truly yours, V Gordon S. Martin Jr. Enclosure: cc: Gary L. Tyler Timothy V* Ramis Bill Monahars/ Wayne lKittelson Ac nda-'Z s M Mrd r Arez) r _ 71rlislr6rJr(t tlerir�rr�oir iltJrlr elr rrr 1 I�Pi�T III)ITt (m� ;� rlr lr i r r t L t qo rr rj1 t t t r e s l i t f t r i Irr e r rrr err err ela r r r r r L e r r r e !ape. -- . $fTIRr] ili'j11 ; � BJ1. fJ1� iJiIrJ IIJ I J � 111Jt � l � ljrJ y NOTE. IF THIS MICROFIUi ED i' -.- --_...� 2 3 4 .—. _ 5 _r 1 __._ .;. DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN '� THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO . THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. oe sz rrz iz az sz _ oz "ez zz tz oz sr Of of of s e - igir�rll116riittl11rr1 t11UNMriNtlirgNeei , ♦. mA*" 7Uvo S Low, r: :.'- - �'�y°r;,;... ��t!!•rY` ', i'- � L� .� :w w:lA.': i. 6.: _ c r ". ,y;,. : < x•'�• ! _ •a. � :.= 1 oC.:9"� 4,�t •_•-' 3�'.."( _ � !� (, A''`i' !•: 1'L,F.If. �,�, 1.�, 'fM'l.w•:a , ate,. •��t^ _ -._ .. .eF' .+a, C!`?• _K: ,,,.. [�i w �'r� t tr� r,I�� o t j,y � •. �1�` 1 ,�• Y r,.:t.. ._:, . .:. :, ,,< ,,_ :4.. r+•,=_ :.ry6. -. 'Fc��i � 11::.'.wrw2'. . 1.::. N y„ i�d-�fni, ,,•:(T ei�+ �'1��'.F-'_•_ •.: .:ir'1 ' .'�. :"„ `^"'°.'t :,,; f.' - '. o: `".;:7G- ,er1..i 1� ".f .ki , #G.t,ia ,.•;f f 't,n'. 1�, a �j 'r ��j•_�(,' �',�:tF' :-< �;'�'r ,�cS $�', •' �'`$ „ ;,<'� � ,- '.: _. .. _: � - SSR.+ ��':;. r"; Y'�•:'- -..:: -:: ,� •:";w r, ;. .► R',.. r-�'..., °�i•:�-.�,_ ..rk: -J+ 1.:: ,: ,rAF .:y, t r.r r: ,R,r �r ',a'>. �&v :... },. ,. ...... .:: -., rya .:�.. •�x+.. rt �+ti'+ .*•:-#:. 'f'.`_' r h,. .,t �'�'�;, r - 11 "•"- t f i .3.,:... ,.:. ':: „ R'�' fi:;. .' '.raR _'. r«",,�' '.e,_.. - .. ;:t � ti- nw:, .(. , e i. L:'i T •.F -- 4 .: .�.,. _., ,,,.., •<j.. ... wL.•: - :. ,.. .- '_•'/' :.:. .t _`.' ,tea a �_' y. �. ,... ti✓; ,� �a`.,. .. '.: rrr.7 ,..,:.r "^- '- :: -• .F,T is n *�," ,0.- t . !{�� ♦'`' - 4 ..M,y(i :,•. ".::Sts':. :, :..' � • ., ,' - T ., r'r^gr�T-�- V r K N7.s ,.. :..: .: ... .. ... 4r,-,::_..: , .,:,, ._ .,gip .:. ,'::, r"'._ .. .+• � fs6 � : . :,_� •. ,, ::. , .. x .lir .. ._. . ...,;- +.. e r� �y F.• :,..J� _[ :.. _... o., ,.....- •._. .-_ .-_„ .: /.w :._.15 . .., .,..:.. 1. t -Al {.. �.... � Y y.. -,,:. 'fi_�.. ,•�i.FnY.:..-, 4 ;--:4. .-,.:. '-.r J! ,.- f. i' ..'�;.,s" f r;., F i r+' /� j i OZ ice". ,.f'iS. jr c- ... _t-. .-::...,_ �. •--. r. �,: - ;. .,.,-• _ may_��J- 1 -'-E.. Ala... tr.n ,.: :1,...... }r •k�K - .T:.'- .€,_ �� r lit L t : a. • , 1 : .. ..,. .. -.;:. . ..... :-.,yrs j, "•�.. 1 a- + � L - - S _ :.,�,C--^':..r ] ;,: ,I 't:_ ,1Fi♦. 'w}J, _1C.. _ .gin: \ ',,,. �r: '-: , ' ,_ ._...- .. --' - ..... .:.-'.Y 'may", -' �i.,, -,iL'a.,a. 1 _•,... .f y� 9h�'� �.. "�y • . r�� -,5µm I A 4 v _ • .3�?Q , �, >.'. -y r." .. 1. ;:: � %��: — ''-=2 r,.� ��• : �l 'a;• -.r3r, • -. �. �'- � , J � � :' �rr., -.kms t-a" .¢�` "}-• �: s, a `h,.a - - �:. �,. �4:.. •.-,. -. _ . ' ,: �. - � ,,:,b:'.-.. '::. `_fir .:.,. 'Rks`Ar^. _ ...' moi... �I 747 40 7 _ . - . �1w� .; r �-.��- ,... f`.. - r�4`:i �':: • _,"�,� 11..: `^- �.>� ��(+,EF. ate, i �, _¢-:::g ,�` ;.4.r:'1+'r :;.�. a #;:� � hk �-`' >"r''l'�y; � x,.it - •k, X t R • I - ter'=°?� •a � :S �:;,_,:� .� �a - yy,E. - �: �' r= %tom-,�e;A; �:=i ` -.�G �4r• a 'C,,r c '�-"x+�` w ��...-�-' ,�r .,� , �� :t� ■ s,FVMw_,�1. Y„ �,j +.L:z, :::� „rte. rr ., �, r r .�,^�.A y"? ,1 1 •o :, ;f: Y.� ,fir -' r�? ; �'� -> c! Jr _ •� ��,, �. :,.: 'j,.. �' Ped �,( r�' b-�1�'^+•' ''ISt. - r.< tea'^ J', Y�,- SrNg `.:. :�4y Fk 2 C! � *`a �''t m 1� cc.� '� .p. •'f a �{ ` Y_ I , h • e. iiiiiiSSS�� -"--- a ,_... ." c .`Sar'.. _._...•� .._z7w : •.•', • 4�_A., CITY OF TIGARD OREGON ' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM ##: �.. DATE SUBMITTED: February 10, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing Held ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: _ZOA 9-85 On January 13, 1986 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton REQUESTED BY: City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 13, 1986, the City Council held a public hearing to consider several amendments to the Community Development Code and to Policy 7.1.2 of the Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to ratify the amendments approved by the City Council. The ordinance is attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached ordinance. 2. Modify the attached ordinance. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance. lw/3585A to Yom.? z , CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL_ AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 6, _L986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE: Park Reservation Fees PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton €€ REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ! MA kn ��i' CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE Should the City Council modify the fees for reservations of Cook Park? INFORMATION SUMMARY At the January 16, 1986. Park and Recreation Board meeting, the Board reviewed a proposal from staff to modify the fees charged for use of Cook Park. A copy of staff's proposal is attached. Also attached is a memo which outlines staff's revised proposal and the Park and Recreation Board proposal. ti ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance to adopt the staff's recommendation to modify the fees charged for the use of Cook Park. 2. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance to adopt the Park and Recreation Board recommendation to modify the fees charged for the use of Cook Park. SUGGESTED ACTION Direct staff to prepare an ordinance to adopt the staff's recommendation to modify the fees charged for the use of Cook Park. 2347P dmj °y_ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council February 6, 1986 FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Park Reservation Fees At the January 16, 1986, Park and Recreation Board meeting, the Board reviewed the attached memo regarding Park reservations fees. The Board discussed staff's proposal and voted to recommend charging fees for reservations in 5 hour increments. In addition, the Board voted to recommend charging a refundable deposit to groups over 100 in size to offset the cost of cleaning the park after use by large groups. The Board recommended that the deposit be set as follows: Grooup I Groups II & III 5-Hour Increments at: Covered Area Soccer and --- Ballfields Groups up to 50 No Charge $20.00 $10.00 51 to 100 No Charge $30.00 $10.00 101 to 150 $40 deposit No Charge $40.00 $10.00 151 to 250 $75 deposit No Charge $50.00 $10.00 251 to 500 $100 deposit No Charge $60.00 $10.00 The Board also requested that the Operations Superintendent be consulted to ensure that the refundable deposit will cover maintenance costs. Jerry McNurlin, Operations Superintendent was consulted regarding the deposit and it is his opinion that the refundable deposit will be too costly to administer to offset the small percentage of instances where large groups leave the park in such a condition that the refund would not be returned. After the Board's recommendation to charge fees for 5 intervals, staff has reconsidered and recommends 4 hour intervals rather than 3 hour intervals as originally suggested. The Park is open for approximately 12 hours per day and the 4 hour interval would allow up to three reservation intervals per day rather than 2 five hour intervals. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following schedule of fees be adopted for reservations of Cook Park- 4-Hour Increments at: Groups up to 50 No Charge $20.00 $10.00 51 to 100 No Charge $30.00 $10.00 101 to 150 No Charge $40.00 $10.00 151 to 250 No Charge $50.00 $10.00 251 to 500 No Charge $60.00 $10.00 Staff recommends that no deposit be required. 2347P dmj September 3, 1985 Bill Monahan Following are comments I have with the fee structure for park reservations, per your request: Some time ago I requested to Frank Currie that we restructure the park reservation fees, due to the fact that some people pay the same amount even if they have reserved the park for two or three hours, or for the full day. I would like to see this structure changed to make it more fair to the users. s Grou i Grou_ py_II & IIi C;wered Area Srcc+ er and .3•Nour Increments at: Ballfields Groups up to 50 No Charge $20.UO S10.00 No Charge $30.00 $1.0.00 51 to 100 $10.00 101 to 150 No Charge $40.00 151 to 250 No Charge $50.00 $10.00 251 to 500 No Charge $60.00 $10.00 For groups such as soccer associations, softball and baseball leagues, other than Tigard Little League, requesting use of the ballfields numerous times be charged the $10.00 reservation fee one time for each during the week, should9 week's use, for each field requested. The above charges include the $10.00 reservation fee, whicheifr"(-1w charging separately. This upsets a lot of people, and i feel it is incorporated into the existing fees per above it could eliminate some of the irritation from the public. Also, you will note that i have suggested reservations in a 3-hour increment. We should be able to reserve to more groups t€lis way, and the revenues would increase. Billie Rawlings 9.04.030(1) A fee shall be collected for reservations of facilities in community and urban parks, as defined in the adopted park standards and placed in a fund to be expended % for Administrative activities, and a placed in a fund to be expended for park maintenance, according to the following: t Group I Groups II & III -3-Hour Increments at: Covered Area Soccer and Ballfields Groups up to 50 No Charge $20.00 $10 .00 51 to 100 No Charge $30.00 $10 .00 101 to 150 No Charge $40.00 $10.00 151 to 250 No Charge $50.00 $10 .00 251 to 500 No Charge $60.00 $10 .00 For groups such as soccer associations, softball and baseball leagues, other than Tigard Little League, requesting use of the ballfields numerous times during the week, should be charged the $10.00 reservation fee one time for each week's use, for each field requested. F CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 10, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Livestock At Large Ordinance PREPARED BY: City Attorney's Office REQUESTED BY: ActinekChief of Police DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Police Department continues to have problems with livestock roaming at large which creates a nuisance and hazard to pedestrians and vehicular traffic. The Tigard Municipal Code has contained no prohibition against allowing livestock to be at large. This attached ordinance is submitted for adoption. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached ordinance. 2. Modify the attached ordinance. 3. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached ordinance. lw/3585A CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUt'Y'1ARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM N: .` , Planning Commission GATE SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION: g ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE• Conditional Use final order for aproval dated 12-12-85 CU 5-85, •Planned Development PD 4-85 PREPARED BY: Planning Staff --- & Variance V 18-85 APPEAL REQUESTED BY: Appeal by Ball, Janick & Novack DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �{f CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Ball, Janik & Novack have appealed Planning Commission's approval to establish a 90,000 sq. ft. miniwarehouse facility and variance to the parking requirements of 93 to 4 spaces. Attached for your review is the applicant's narrative prepared by Mackenzie/Saito & Assoc., miscellaneous letters, staff report, Planning Commission minutes, Planning Commission Final Order 85-22, and a copy of the request+ far appeal. NOTE: Above items have not been included in your packet as this may be resolved so a Public Hearing may not be necessary. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Uphold Planning Commission's approval. 2. Modify Planning Commission's approval. 3. Reverse Planning Commission's approval and deny the application. SUGGESTED ACTION NATE Open Public Hearing and set over to February 17, 1986. MEMORANDUM f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council February 6, 1986 FROM. Bob Jean, City Administrato SUBJECT: Tax Base Ballot Measure The following is the language proposed for submission of the Tax Base question to the voters at the 5/20/86 primary election. This will. be put in a resolution format and hand—carried for your consideration Monday evening. 51. CITY OF TIGARD TAX BASE QUESTION: SHALL THE CITY BE AUTHORIZED A NEW TAX BASE OF $1,700,0007 EXPLANATION: The City's current tax base has been in effect since 1980. In that time, City population has increased from 15,000 to an estimated 22,000. Federal, State, and County funds have been cut. City savings are none. The growing need for services has exceeded remaining revenues. Service level cuts and layoffs have occurred. Police neighborhood patrol hours have been cut. Emergency response times have increased. Parks maintenance is limited mostly to Cook Park. County library funds end next year. Federal Revenue Sharing funds are cut. The City Council and Budget Committee unanimously recommended this new Tax Base to the voters. The City is allowed an $838,527 Tax Base next year. This measure authorizes a new Tax Base of $1,700,000. All of the increase is to maintain or restore Police, Parks, Library, Youth and Senior programs. lw/3668A { r JUa CITYCWTIFA WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON February 4, 198£ Tigard City Council Tigard City Hall Honorable Mayor and City Council: The Tigard Library Board has met and discussed the Citizens Advisory Board's recommendation to replace the Washington County Cooperative Library Service with the formation of a library district in the unincorporated area, plus any city that wishes to join. We have also studied the other options presented in the W.C.C.L.S. staff report. W.C.C.L.S. has been a viable and valuable instrument in developing and strengthening library service in the County. Therefore, we feel compelled to suggest that a stop be called to what appears to be a rush to judgment on the matter of forming a library district. We do not believe that all other options have been sufficiently studied in order to justify the recommendation for a district at this time. As we look for the right solution, we would rather preserve what has proven to be effective. This rush to produce a quick solution strikes us as a sure way to make things worse instead of better. Maintaining the status quo in order to allow sufficient time to make the best choices does not seem all that undesirable. If we must pass one more serial levy so as to allow services and cautious deliberations, we are prepared to live with that necessity. s As your Library Board, we await your consideration on this matter and are available to assist the Council in any way. Sincerely, Tigard Library Board2. Walt Munhall, Chairman WM/dc:1134p 12755 S.WL?ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 uk.< k rest Prove February 4, 1986 Donald D. Stilwell, County Administrator Washington County Administrative Office 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 RE: W.C.C.L.S. Governance Dear Don: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the WCCLS governance . issue. The points which I would raise are: 1 . It seems as if WCCLS participants are being guided toward the formation of a library district without having fully explored the alternatives, in- cluding that of the maintenance of status quo. The staff report which has been, presented to the Commissioners is premature and, again, does not represent a full discussion of the issues by all affected participants. Last Fall, Forest Grove chose not to take a position on the formation of a library district not because it wished to avoid the issue but, rather, the question dealt with only a portion of the issue and not the entire tR issue of governance. • 2. 1 would suggest, as have many others, that discussions involving all impacted entities - including Washington County Commissioners and stiff- - commence immediately and begin to explore all available options to the governance issue. 3. The Forest Grove City Council and Library Commission are aware that the governance issue still needs to be resolved and, at this point, are supportive of maintenance of status quo. While this comment may be more appropriate in a group discussion of the WCCLS issue, I offer it now because it appears. that pressure is being exerted to go toward the library district without full discussions with all parties involved. 4. Finally and for all of the reasons listed previously, 1 would urge the County Commissioners to defer action on the January 13, 1986, WCCLS report and library district issue and, instead, initiate formal dialogue with 'the Citizens Advisory Board, WCCLS staff and the Ad Hoc City Managers/Librarians group. Hopefully, such a procedure can result in a reasonable resolution to this very important issue. Sincerely, Michael E. Solomon City Manager cc: Forest Soth, Chairman, Citizens Advisory Board Ad Hoc City Managers/Librarian's Group Donna Selle, W.C.C.L.S. CITY OF FOREST GROVE P.O.Box 326 Forest Grove,Oregon 97116 (503)357-7151 �1y �� WASH*4GMN OREGON February 4, 1986 Donald Stilwell County Administrator County Administration Bldg. 150 North First Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124 Dear Mr. St Thank you for your letter of January 31, asking for our concerns regardingoa e Washington County Cooperative Library Services Citizens Advisory recommendation to form a new Library Service District as an alternative to the current library governance structure. Attached is the letter from With tmy he d's Library Board to the Tigard City Council in this regard, along thoughts in this letter. The Council will be considering its position at February 10, 1986, meeting. As staff, we do not see any benefit for Tigard to join the district as described in the W.C.C.L.S. staff report and the C.A.B. working papers which were sent to us. In fact, the cons greatly outweigh the pros. It concerns us particularly that whereas W.C.C.L.S. was organised to (1) extend library mprove the library service in service to the unincorporated area and (2) to i established libraries of the County, the proposed district addresses primarily the service to the unincorporated area and the construction of new facilities. We don't dispute the need for this, but the need to improve ies is l there and Tigard service a established doesinotrcontinuestoladdress that concern ould equally. r in equally joining Furthermore, we believe that the C.A.B. has made this recommendation precipitously without thoroughly weighing the possible consequences. As it now stands, this recommendation may very well fragment countywide library services and actually depzive the unincorporated area All ofu e stand tolose vice they have come to expect and library utilize under W.C.C.L.S. many of the gains we have made with W.C.C.L.S. in the last ten years. We do not consider the district to be the only option. Though pursuing these options may not fit into the time-line established by the C.A.B., we believe that the magnitude of this change demands reconsideration of the time-line to allow adequate time to develop and present other proposals that would more nearly preserve the delivery of all the library services as wenow faciliti know it in with W.C.C.L.S., as well as address the need to develop library the unincorporated area. 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 Donald Stilwell Letter ' Page 2 February 4, 1986 We understand the County's concerns regarding the structure and governance of W.C.C.L.S. as it now stands. -But we need to remember that W.C.C.L.S. did not come into being until a thorough study was done and all participants were satisfied that their needs were being met and that they shared the common goals of W.C.C.L.S. as previously enumerated. It took almost two years to revise the allocation formula, but cooperation and consideration carried us through. How can we change the entire make-up of W.C.C.L.S with less effort? We believe that there is real danger in pursuing the present hurried course and would request that a more realistic time-line be established to allow a more thorough study of the issue so that we may, cooperatively, reach the best solution for all. Sincerely, Rotiert W. Jean City Administrator RWJ/dc:1134p enclosure CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM H: DATE SUBMITTED: FebruaryL 6, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: a ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Murray Rd. Ext. Discussion PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan _ REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should the Council adopt road and intersection design standards for the Murray Blvd. Extension which are proposed by a joint recommendation of Washington County, Beaverton, ODOT, METRO, and Tigard's Community Development Department. INFORMATION SUMMARY The Community Development Department has met on two occasions with representatives of Washington County, Beaverton, ODOT, and METRO to evaluate the design standards which will best serve the North Tigard areas as it develops. The ad hoc group has prepared standards for inclusion in the Tigard/Washington County UPAA, including a modification to the Council's adopted route and intersection of the Murray Blvd. Ext. The Council. should consider the proposal prior to meeting with Beaverton's City Council. The proposal advocated by staff would result in Murray Blvd. functioning without traffic coming to a stop at 135th. The proposal is based on the staff ; analysis of efficiency as well as safety. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Review the information presented and discuss the issue with the r Beaverton City Council. On February 17, 1986, accept the joint recommendation of the staff from the give governmental agencies and direct the Community Development Department to include the Y recommendation in the Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. 2. Review the information presented and discuss the issue with the Beaverton City Council. On February 17, 1986, modify the staff recommendation and direct staff to include the modification in the negotiation of an Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. 3. Take no action. SUGGESTED ACTION The staff recommends that the City Council review the information presented and discuss the issue with the Beaverton City Council. On February 17, 1986, accept the joint recommendation of the staff from the give governmental agencies and direct the Community Development Department to include the recommendation in the Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. ® (2345P) f MEMORANDUM \ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Members of the City Council February 6, 1986 @ FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Murray Blvd, Extension The attached draft letter was prepared jointly by Washington County, Beaverton, METRO, ODOT and T in an attempt 'to resolve the long standing dispute over the construction and operation of the Murray Blvd. extension in Tigard. The letter was prepared for review by the Tigard and Beaverton j Councils in a joint session, consistent with my earlier comments to you at the Friday evening work session with department heads, conducted by the Council on f January 17, 1986. Bob Jean suggested that you be given an opportunity to view } the information prior to your joint meeting of February 13th with the Beaverton City Council. The letter points out that either option which we have been grappling with over the years will result in increased traffic to the area. What the Council must consider is how the actual intersection will function and how the function will either increase or decrease the liability of the City. Based on the analysis of METRO and the State, the "T" Intersection proposed will create a situation that is not workable given the traffic which will be generated within the area. The density which the City has approved in the area will, upon development, make a "T" intersection both inefficient and more dangerous ' than other options. The preferred option is one that allows traffic headed north and south along the extension flow through the intersection with traffic heading south on 135th coming to a stop. This preferred option, designed to the specifications outlined in the draft memo, will serve the area more efficiently and reduce the City's liability. I support the memo which has been prepared and urge the City Council to give strong consideration to revising its stand on the intersection in light of the intersection and road standards which have been negotiated by the City with the County and other agencies. I feel that the standards which we have reached agreement on will make the road function as the Council intended without placing undue restriction on the function of the intersection. (WAM:br/2345P) 4 __ January 27, 1986 To Tigard City Council Beaverton City Council Board of County Commissioners From Bill Monahan, Community Development Director - and John Gillam, Transportation Planner - Beaverto ndy Cotugno, Director of Transportat=on - Me Tom Schwab, Tr ffic Engineer - ODOT Bruce Warne 'Vputy Director, Land Use & Transportation - Washington County Re MURRAY ROAD EXTENSION INTRODL':.TION In an effort to eliminate misconceptions, inaccuracies, and conflicts among transportation plans of the City of Beaverton, City of Tigard, and Washington County, two meetings were held with representatives from affected agencies . to develop a common technical base and understanding of existing and projected traffic patterns in this area. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM"iENDATIONS Based on a review of the latest traffic projections prep_ared by Metro as - - a portion of the SW Corridor Analysis, the following conclusions can be made: The construction of a westerly bypass or widening of Highvay 217, 99W, and Sunset Highway are necessary to assure that traffic volumes in the Murray Road extension/Walnut/Gaarde area are kept at a 2) Without such a bypass or highway widening improvements, traffic volumes will increase significantly in the northwest Tigard area due to motorists trying to avoid congestion on existing state facilities; and - 3) A Murray Road Extension is necessary to provide a transportation network for the residents of the northwest Tigard and south Beaverton area to and from state facilities meaning the current arterial designation is not correct since it fun:tions as a collector r�.•ad; and 4) The Murray Road Extension will carry -less traffic than originally planned in the 1983 Washington Ccanty Transportation Plan; and Raw MWErs- r Murray Road Extension January 27, 1986 Page 2 5) A 'T' intersection constructed to adopted engineering standards will not reduce traffic volumes on the Murray Extension/Walnut/Gaarde Streets; and 6) A 'T' intersection not constructed to adopted engineering standards would creme traffic safety problems and possible liability to the governing ag-ency; and 7) Without the Murray Road Extension, traffic volumes on SW 135th Avenue will increase sigi•ificantly causing traffic safety concerns at its r intersection with Old -cholls Ferry Rcad. This safety problem may necessitate closure; and 8) Without the Murray'Road Extensio.n, traffic on SW 121st Avenue between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Gaarde Streets will druble in the next 15-20 years. 9 Further, it is recommended the following actions be taken to assure there is complete agreement on this facility, its functional class, and traffic carry capacity: 1) City of Beaverton, City of Tigard, and Washington County agree and t make necessary plan amendments to enact common functional class and design requirements for the Murray Road Extension; and 2) The Murray Road Extension be constructed with the following classification - and design considerations: - - - Designation -- Collector Number of Travel Lanes -- 2 (plus turn lanes at major intersections) Eike Lanes -- Yes Right-of-Way Requirements-- 60 feet (plus slope easements where- necessary).-. - Paved ecessary)._. _Paved Width -- 40 foot minimum Ac:ess -- Limited Design Speed -- 35 M.P.H. Minimum Turning Radius -- 350 to 500 feet Parking Facilities -- None provided on street 3) Any changes to current land-use designations in the Murray Road Extension area coordinated with all jurisdic�ions to assure that traffic impacts are adequately analyzed since all current traffic projections are based on the existing land-use designations; and 4) The Murray Road Extension should be constructed to five lanes n_ar the Murray/Old Scholls intersection to adequately address turning movements f in bc:h directions; and f Murray Rc.ad Extension January 27, 1986 Page 3 5) City of Beaverton, Tigard and Washington County should vigorously support improvements to the surrounding regional transportation system as outlined in the Regional Tra,.L: 3rtation Plan; and 6) The actual alignment, to be subsequently developed, will be formulated by the Cities of Beaverton or Tigard based on the design standards outlined in 2) abcve; and 7) Maps reflecting the above noted classification and design considerations be prep:red for adoption in the Urban Planning Area Agreements (UPAA) between Washington County and City of Beaverton and Washington County and City of Tigard; and 8) The Intersection design of S.W. 13h Avenue and Murray Extension should Z •�M :,;. not be a 'T' Inters- ction due to potential liability to the governing agency and since no reduction in through traffic will result; and 9) Improvement to S.W. Gaarde Street between S.W. 121st Avenue and Pacific Highway should occur coincident with Extension of Murry Road from Walnut) 15th Avenue to Gaarde -..;:)rovements. _ ... BACKGROUND Washington County adopted its Transportation Pian on June 28, 1983. This stated the Murray Blvd. Extension is a minor arterial/major collector. This designation and mapping of this facility have been a point of =onflict between Yashington County and City of Tigard for years. In June 152_3, ~� an 'Urban Area Planning Agreement (UPAA) between Washington County and Tigard included language which stated that the need and location for the Murray Blvd. connection was unresolved. It also stated that until this issue was resolved the City and County agreed to take no actions which would preclude "alternative solus ions" :..__ K.. . .. __. . Since the time of that"agreement, the UPAA has expired and various develop ments have been approved by City of Tigard and subsequently appealed by the County to their City Council for resc'ution of the street design in . early 1984. After lengthy discussions and expenditures of funds by the City and the County, interim revisions to land development actions were taken. However, the unresolved transportation issues still haunted the reactiviated UPAA in April 1984. In June 1985, the UPAA expired again and Mur-ay PDad Extension issue was still unresolved. Thus, as a result of the need to reactivate the UPAA, on-going development, and proposed land use changes in the area, it is imperative that the Murray Road Extension issue be resolved. To that end"-_.._ a meeting was c0 led with representatives from Metro, the City of Ti-----rd, City of Beaverton, Washington County, and ODOT to help resolve and achieve a common technical base of know'edge. Murray Road Extension January 27, 1986 Page 4 ALTFINATIvES Based on the review of traffic numbers provided by all jurisdictions, it became obvious that the connection of Murray Road between Old Scho.1s FErry and Walnut/Gaarde area is necessary to assire that the Tigard n_4gr.orhoods and south Beaverton residents can get to work and other major _.ate transportation facilities. The traffic numbers did show, however, that this road serves mainly this area and does not act as a regional rou:.e for traffic be-.Ween Beaverton and Tigard or other a--as in South County. The numbers also show that -he Westly Bypass or an expansion of the Sunset Highway, Highway 217 and 99W are necessary to avoid major traffic impacts in this area. Traffic impacts would be the greatest with no bypass or widening of the highways and no Murray Road Extension. The numbers also show that very little (120) through traffic is attr=acted as a result of the extension of Murray Road. With the extension and either the bypass or widening Sunset Highway, it res foL7d thet approxi:.ately 8,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day would travel this road. The attached analysis also shows that the provis'an of a 'T' int--section in lieu of a sweeping curve reduces the attr.4ti of this facilit) very slightly. It is estimated that approximately 27 vehicles per hour " 2%) less will utilize this facility if a 'T' intersection is included at 13cth Avenue and the Murray Extension. The analysis was also perfo•-med a modified 'T' ir.:Qrsection which woLld be built to ac:epted traffic _Bfety standards. Thus, three alternatives for the intersection at 1:5th and - - Murray Extension were analyzed. Those are: -- 1) Curve -- This alternative assumes that design standards are the same throughout this facility, and traffic is mellowed to free flew from Murray to Walnut. The advantages to this are traffic flow, energy i -" conservation, traffic safety, driver convenience, and lact, of conflicts.' ' ---" The disadvantages are thet it will attract approximately 27 vehicles-_. _ - � �.__._.___ per hour (200 more than the other alternatives.-__-- 2) lternatives.____.___2) Modified 'T' Intersection - This alternative assumes the intersection of 135th and Murray Extension would to widened sufficiently to allow safe turn refuges and right turn movements for southbound Murray Road Extension vehicles. This would require 135th Avenue to be at least three to four travel lanes. The advantage of this alternative is the design of this facility (sirce it was designed to current traffic engineering standards) would not pose a liability concern to the governing agency. The disadvantages are inconvenience, conflicting turning mover_rts, extra costs, decreased safety and excessive roadway width wh;:h r2sults__. ___...._ in driver confusion. Y r Murray Road Extension January 27, 1956 Page 5 wO lane ht 3) T Inter=action -- This alternat ve assumes two lane/tof tref: icrattraction. 7T. The advantage of this tersectiontwithuno'turon n2lanes, unsaTe turning rningg The disadventages include intersection public agency for knowlinzly movements and liab_ y to g an u r.safe intersection design for the turn volumes projected for this intersection. on and n of Based on ;.he analysis above, it as the conclusi built incltieunoftaomodified all participants that a curve (alternative T intersection or a standard 'T' intersection. taebeebuiltndueitossfety present , would not rEcommebl the straight 7 in an.- liability problems. i modified requirements, considered as a and potentialible lut on. However, due to roadway width requirements, recommended. confusion, the curve (al ;,ernative 1) JO m r F= In 19—mama 0 METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT 527 S W HALL Sr PORTLAND,OREGON 97M &13 20-1645 ProvkftToo Travp&Ubn SlidW&SMand velarRaglorWServi0m Date: January 17, 1986 To: Bruce Warner, Washington County John Gillam, City of Beaverton Bill Monahan, City of Tigard From: )VAndrew Cotugno, Transportation Director Regarding: Traffic Impacts Associated with Murray Boulevard Extension Attached is information documenting projected year 2005 P.M. peak-hour traffic for various road networks in the vicinity of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension and for various scenarios for the surrounding regional street system. A series of alternatives are included involving a progression from a low-traffic demand through the corridor to a high-traffic demand through the corridor. This series of alternatives involves implementation of the proposed Highway 217/Sunset Westside transportation scenario without the Murray Boulevard extension for a low-traffic condition to an alternative that includes the Murray Boulevard extension, but without surround- ing improvements to the regional highway system. The various alternatives between these two benchmarks include different configurations and lengths of a Murray Boulevard extension with and without the surrounding regional transportation system. All of the alternatives represent variations of the "Highway 217/Sunset" Westside system scenario with the exception of one bypass alternative. The bypass alternative indicates that the traffic effects through the Murray Boulevard corridor for a bypass scenario are essentially the same as for the Highway 217/ Sunset scenario and that the tradeoffs as to what configura- tions to build are not strongly related to the bypass versus Highway 217/Sunset decision. The following are observations and conclusions about the attached traffic information: 1. Assuming construction of the proposed "Highway 217/ Sunset" system or "Bypass" system, but without the proposed Murray Boulevard extension, the traffic volumes projected for 135th, Walnut, 122nd, and Gaarde are all in excess of the substandard condition of the roadways. The character of traffic is for a a 1 Memorandum January 17, 1986 Page 2 major collector level facility, but the quality of the roadways existing is insufficient to handle projected traffic. The situation is particularly a problem at the intersection of 135th and the New Scholls/Old Scholls intersection because of the unsafe geometries of the intersection. The increase in traffic volumes on 135th with development of the area significantly increases traffic operating through that intersection, creating a very unsafe condition. I would recommend, in fact, closing the 135th Avenue leg of this intersection if these high volumes are projected because of the unsafe condition. 2. If the Highway 217/Sunset transportation system includes construction of a "Phase I" Murray Boulevard extension (from the intersection of Murray and Scholls to 135th Avenue) , the overall traffic through the corridor will increase some 12 percent in the western parts of the corridor and 6 percent in the eastern parts of the corridor. This facility would relieve the traffic problems on 135th and at the 135th/Scholls intersection, but would leave the heavy traffic on E Walnut and 122nd. In addition, this configuration would create a difficult traffic operating condition due to the close proximity of the 135th/Walnut inter- section and the 135th/Murray Boulevard extension intersection with the predominant traffic flow being between the Murray Boulevard extension and Walnut. 3. If the Highway 217/Sunset alternative were constructed with the full Murray Boulevard extension from Murray/ Scholls to Gaarde, the total traffic increase through the corridor would be 25 percent above a condition with no Murray Boulevard extension in the west end of the corridor, and 13 percent increase in the east end of the corridor. Construction of this facility would f urtber relieve traffic increases on Walnut and 122nd, but ;got on Gaarde. Under this scenario, special attention would be required to design the intersec- ti. -- along the length of the bypass to handle the preaominant flow of traffic. Intersections not adequately designed to handle the traffic flow would create a difficult and unsafe traffic operating condition. If these facilities were designed to meet traffic operating standards and, therefore, limit the liability exposure of the jurisdiction, the impedi- ment to traffic flow would be minimal. ti Memorandum January 17, 1986 Page 3 4. If the Murray Boulevard extension alternative were designed intentionally to discourage traffic, it would likely create unsafe operating conditions and maximum liability exposure to the jurisdiction. 5. If the surrounding regional highway system is insufficient, significant additional traffic impacts through the Murray Boulevard extension corridor would occur. Under a condition where the "mini" bypass connecting from Scholls Ferry Road to Highway 99W were not built, traffic through the corridor would increase to 36 percent above a condition with no Murray Boulevard extension. if, in addition to this, the widening of Highway 217 did not occur , the traffic increase through the corridor would be 61 percent above a condition with no Murray Boulevard extension. AC/gl 5QO6C/D3-2 F_. f_ t Murray Boulevard Extension Scenarios 2005 P.M. Peak-Hour Traffic Cutline #1 Change from Cutline #2 Change from East of 135th #1 West of 99W #1 1. 217/Sunset without WB 379 924 Murray Extension EB 700 919 Total 1,079 1,843 2. 217/Sunset with WB 456 990 Phase I Murray EB 756 968 _ Extension Total 1,212 +133/+12% 1,968 +115/+6'% 3. 217/Sunset with WB 465 1,000 downscoped Murray EB 774 990 Extension Total 1,239 +160/+15% 11990 +147/+8% 4. 217/Sunset with WB 517 1,050 full Murray Exten- EB 831 1,035 sion Total 1,348 +269/+25% 2,085 +242/+13% 5. Bypass Alternative WB 525 with full Murray EB 840 Extension Total 1,365 +286/+26% 6. 217/Sunset with WB 573 1,133 Murray Extension EB 897 1,160 without Mini- Total 1,470 +391/+36% 2,293 +450/+24$ Bypass 7. 217/Sunset with WB 671 1,218 Murray Extension EB 1,061 1,246 without Mini- Total 1,732 +653/+61% 2,464 +621/+34% Bypass without 217 widening i" ACC:lmk 1-14-86 t. lama m �W Alternative l 217/Sunset Scenario Without Murray Extension 1 r AA t►,' c'^ 3 k V M N oz 1-liz r l � i r r ® -z PF 9t� �.' 7,411 f ff fS2 = 9aS 1 O 1- 1 V E 1 o tt ., N z ; } m s v a C 3 cu R 0 U w 6-4 L.n z M Q c Q LIJ 1 d 1 a (Dial Alternative 2 217/Sunset Scenario with Phase I Murray Extension (Scholls @ Murray to 135th) 4 y N dna aD � US w IWO 1 � w � d S a F 0 146 U2 M tea << r ROE as aO r w N rt t �e ® m m m u' Ags O GO l.11 4 i � t O F- U W � u H d O N O ` O � O � Q c J O 1 w t j . �� M o N to y m �S UA LABW La �$ ru Z \: O „ F-- U W W Z Z LD L.f1 5. O F `^ L Ld V J a O ` i F O Ln at N cm LLJi W� V rt AL U,ea w r f i 1 1 1 �t 1 •M 6 F t 1 of 1 W 1 t .-• co . t P I t m d to c co It Fos Is •- .r i coco a 42 cl � N N q' •• •• = N •O •• •• C 1,01 � � 11 1 � _ � � ; Alternative 3 217 Sunset Scenario with Murray Extension designed- to discourage traffic l e0 N A O� L Z LP rD LL i-gas- N N N ar j ON n0S ti DA � x 9 � � r W O P4 OF L.A 9A � e a O N 1 w d rd em— 0 � N IY Z FEW ®eo a UA 0 ev U) • z O w w v • O � l.f1 � O O � ,J s C p e 0 LnQ ® Q m fow— • y N r y w � to 4 z cv ico $ L9 O r � f A. LIJ W Z O OLLI x X: y # ' O > O r Ln ° m L v°� C � Co 4� 1 !e fi i t i N�p 8 t . 0 N C w tm M w = M N ®= N fig I r Alternative 4 217/Sunset Scenario with Murray Extension built to standards +.�� +,�.,� +- r + ..is + � +_;► +_ +_+ _ - + +.+ i + � + _ _ f. r Y' �1 t W r 'r; r •1 ;.s. n. 1- w - n AA��•j CV Z O ( wcn ` Z 0-4 ff� O a.C► t�t1 W c O Ln o �� w P W a � 0 00 tri 4 c%j i co i Ln U z O ' Id f ul Ld F u 1 z y Z La ® tl © _ W tl M -i > tl C asR a N C-) ti to y i $ W t w!~A NN g® ' d C. Q) rau i` ii i o .,. �� •• w w w w •• w r w w w c d a d a .. �, FIN l : j I ^ � I . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . dw � f® \ . - Q \ - �� - . . p _ 2 > . , . . . . ■ a d< y2 * : . • < - �� r Alternative 5 Bypass Scenario with Murray Extension built to standards t` M i o doN e� V W ' r y Jr Ln (� o N ' it i f 4 E ' G f CU co t tf Ln !� t ♦iy � F � � t o 19k o Act t - t e z 1 i I I5 2 i { s S N i 1 qr r _ N qmr Ap w •• N N N M N N M •• •• •• �� a a� � � !! •� v � @ O a! Z i 9 Alternative 6 217 Sunset Scenario with Murray Extension t built to standards without "mini" bypass from Scholls Ferry to 99W � Yx r N r r. ■ - r G� •4 J w - r � La ®= m Se O N cn U W U) W M ui Ln I Lu ` " D trip 3 c t co ill C!1 Z D W cr w I-- AS ll � O "' o cn w J � p D Q Q Ln , C--) � Q Li } S4 ' m � M w •. N Y/ A N •• N •• w r♦ ) I S 7 NSF rfin IBM Alternative 7 217 Sunset Scenario with Murray Extension built to standards without widening of 217 without "mini" bypass - Scholls to 99W e gym ~ J � a J O � 6 tit i O A N i M r t t e ®-- s Q cu r W o d � Cn '° tiJ � �? t Ln •~ i LIJ r e s m . t • cn r z O s i N O � cu Ln � y LU Q o M f 1 R, t t�t i s E `s s 's s 1 F 1 K ° a v h_ r- N « 3 1 a7 fe+� ., A « w m�� r w •• M w w � •• M N = w w CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 2/10/86 AGENDA ITEM #!: / () , DATE SUBMITTED: 2/6/86 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Departmental Reports-Administration PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet REQUESTED BY: r DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Monthly Departmental Reports INFORMATION SUMMARY The December volunteerism report is attached for your information. You may note the decline in some categories, which may be due to seasonal conditions. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED { SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and File MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: 2/5/86 FROM: Donna Corbet, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: Non-Staff Resources/Volunteer Report Category 1984-85 Dec. '85 1985-86 % Chane Boards 6 280 1766.75 +38% Committees: 2552.75 Volunteer 293 2240.50 + 7% Staffing 4173.75 Federal 54 899 -34% Assistance 2660 4 Community -0- 403 -52% Service 1676 Other 1300 -0- 55 -90% Total: 12,362.50 637 5364.25 -13% t" (O961p) CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0: DATE SUBMITTED:_February 6 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUVEJAGENDA TITLE: Monthly_RePort December 1985 Community DeveloQment PREPARED BY: W. A. Manahan REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: Z� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: . INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached please find the Monthly report for December, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1, Annexation Report Z, Building Division Report 3, Capital Project Status Report 4, Economic Development Minutes 5, Engineering Division Report s, Operations Division Reports 7, Planning Commission Minutes 8, Transportation Committee Minutes ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place on file. (0950P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council February 6, 1986 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report — December, 1985 Attached please find the Monthly Report for December, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3. Capital Project Status Report 4• Economic Development Minutes 5• Engineering Division Report 6. Planning Decisions 7. Operations Division Report 8. Transportation Committee Minutes Following is a comparison of building activity for December of 1984 and 1985: December, 1984 December, 1985 Single Family Permits 11 Multi—Family Permits 18 (total Units) Q8 Commercial Permits 0 Building Permit Fees 2 1 Plan Check Fees $ 11,193.50 $ 7,964.00 Plumbing Permits 2,535.27 4,653.09 Mechanical Permits 3,605.30 2,325.00 Sign Permits 1,277.001 851.00 Valuation 170.00 130.00 $ 2,887,200.00 $ 1,563,466.00 The totals for 1985 activity compares to 1984 as follows: Jan — Oec 1984 Jan — Dec 1985 Single Family Permits 195 Multi—Family Permits 277 (total Units) 80 Commercial Permits 342 Bui.ldin4- Permit Fees45 20 Plan Check Fees $ 121,968.29 $ 167,311.67* Plumbing Permits 53,601.37 74,559.29 Mechanical Permits 37.741.23 76,862.28 Sign Permits 6,742.02 10,633. 15 Valuation 2.510.00 1,235.00 $28,766,912.00 $41,525,590.00* *These figures reflect the final figures for 1985 adjusted to delete rebates and reflect other minor accounting revisions. mffwffw� OWN December, 1985 The Economic Development Committee continued to discuss the formation of a downtown non—profit organization. The Committee suggested that a representative of Tri Met attend the January meeting to discuss the proposed transit center planned for the downtown. A representative of the Oregon Mai Street Program met with John, Bill and Jeanne to discuss the possibility of Tigard's participation in the program. The Committee was encouraged by the position feedback given. End of the Year Summary The Building, Planning and Engineering revenues exceeded projections. All indications point to another strong year in 1986. C; (WAM:brl0950P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council February 4, 1986 FROM: Elizabeth A. Newton, Senior Planner �(�✓� SUBJECT: December Annexation Report ` On December 13, 1985, Lloyd and Arletta Taylor submitted a request to annex 34.9 acres into the City of Tigard. The application was scheduled for the January 13, 1986 Council meeting. On December 21, 1985 the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission approved the Perrin/Schenck annexation which involved one lot of .80 acre:, un the north side of SW North Dakota near SW 92nd Avenue. EAN:bs96 C MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: January 2, 1986 SUBJECT: BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MONTH OF December . 1985 NUMBER OF PERMITS/TYPE VALUE OF WORK PERMIT FEE PLAN CHECK 4% 18 new single family res. $1,027,966 $5,467.50 $3,044.03 $218.70 1 res. alterations 500 15.00 9.75 .60 1 new commercial(+-1 sitework) 80,000 476.00 309.35 19.04 10 coml. alterations 455,000 1,626.50 1,222.03 79.63 misc. structures 1 other dem?aiition,SFR -0- 15.00 -0- .60 TOTAL VALUE 1,563,466 1 King City comm'l alt. 15,000 110.50 67.93 4.42 1 " Plbg. ---- 20.00 -0- .80 1 11 Mech. ---- 14.50 -0- .58 36 Mechanical permits ---- 851.00 20.15 34.04 24 Plumbing Permits ---- 2,:295.00 -0- 93.00 ___L_Signs 130.00 22 Sewer Connections (20%) 5,460.00 20 Sewer Inspections (1002) 715.00 4 Amart/Wedgwood 1,440.00 5 Leron Hts. 750.00 o c o g o $ o g o o 0 ui aio 0 0 0 ori o 0 0 in n 0 m f f m ♦ o O m u O. E EEo U �I m O O N N N m m N N N N N - m m m m m m f Y a a m m m T T T m m M m m m m cr f N b M .fr Y � h a m wb. .m+ f M n N N ? rAI 6 77 pp 0 N $ n .. .... m yi -• m GI r _ m m m m m m m y: 9• O. N N N N n n N N 10 p n T T N Y M b ¢ E N t� O P N �` O n �n a• � m a . p a N .~• r +Tn b b W n n n O 2 H a mi O tmr! f 'O6' M i00 G! N m N N U A n a m A m n gh In .+ b N N A M W b in D+ ♦ m f m - N m M t t to b b A C 8 S N 9 2 "- b b b ♦ � m ut n �^ D� O �tf .+ a n Ibn co m a O - A N N b. m b O 1f! N o M W D� W f f N fT dl A m ti n f f N A n A LLT b T b O N ♦ f ♦ N M l� M b b b un m b W .ba b N m T T Y E L n L .r min W a+ 7 Y •'+ OI T M O41 g rP°stlw a ►mss r�i to i o } .. _:vo ro V •C^S V O O b O f O O O M A f m Q �f1 m M N N N N N M N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ® S O n b b f P m M A m G t4 n Q m N O� m f T b 1n N O A eV O b O, Y 4o Q M O A f N M W h M O f �O M h_ O Q• W O m N W +n b f Y1 h m f f r x b AG Uf .p+ b O O b w -wO N � 1l! � if1 Q� N � ♦ H m N ca O J M G1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N b N f ��jj QQ QQQ 1Q1� QQ A QII n C Pf'1' N v � O o A cA% N Mb h 1n cp at .r L Cd fe u u a r t ++ o a a �o ro m n > a u oo a v r n s i� h n ¢ w O x o # 3_ ss� R r February 3, 1986 CAPITAL PROJECT MONTHLY STATUS REPORT L.I.D. 's 72nd Street L.I.D. The ordinance accepting the engineer' s final report and closing out the project was adopted by Council on January 20, 1986, 68th 6 Parkway Street L.I.Q. The final legal papers needed to secure the entire right-of-way have been received and recorded. The contractor broke ground January 20. July 30 is the scheduled completion date. Ken Elliot is researching the issue of the City financing private utility improvements through Bancroft Bonding. 68th Sewer LID As noted in previous reports, this project is complete except for the installation of a 140 foot lateral at Elmhurst that crosses Mrs. Ball's property. A large fill on the property to be served needs to be toed to allow a manhole to be installed. The agent for the owner of the lot advised that he was unaware that the contractor who deposited the fill. had not obtained a permit and had improperly contoured the fill. Staff has advised that construction of the lateral is on hold until the grading of the fill is accomplished. Once this is done staff will recontact Mrs. Ball's attorney regarding the necessary easement. 135th Street L.T.D. Bill Monahan is meeting with the county and Beaverton on February 10th regarding the issue of the configuration and location of the Murry Blvd. extension. This issue has held up formation of the L.I.D. 74th and Cherry Sewer L.I.D. The preliminary engineering analysis is complete. The estimated costs were higher than anticipated. Engineer is looking at ways to cut costs. 100th and Inez Same comments as above apply. Dartmouth Street L.I.Q. Still no decision from the Court of Appeals on the Martin case. Page 1 Mr. Martin presented his proposed alternative route for the Darmouth extension to staff on January 27. The City received a letter from Don Pollock, who owns property in the District, expressing support for Martin's proposal.. A first draft of the ATEP triangle transportation report is due in early : i February. Hall/Burnham Street L.I.O. ` Stuart Cato delivered the final plans and drawings to the City in mid—January. They have been reviewed by staff and sent to Bob Wright for his comments. On January 22, Ken Elliot sent out purchase offers to the land owners within the district, t With regard to the signal capital improvement project, negotiations are s proceeding with the State for the City to acquire jurisdiction of Hall. Cato redesi City will have to have is preparing a p 9n traffic signal report. The jurisdiction before the signal can be installed, proposed the Regarding the: highway department's ro osed left turn lane project, State's Title TI Funding request is on hold at present. This is because the $60,000 amount recommended by the Salem office is not sufficient to fund the project as dcasi9ned. A refunding request is in preparation. i Canterbury Siaryal L.I.D. Consideration of the State's request for additional funding continues to be on hold. Higher priority projects have set back review of the proposal. C.I.P. 's Fanno Crook Park Handl rail ,�interpretive center, and other building materials have been received. 69th Sewer Completed as of 1/31/86. Other Projects have d to either Thirty of this year's toAthe City itself-is Following cis aslistewhich details consulting engineers � these assignments: Page 2 PROJECT CONSULTING ENGINEER I. STREETS A. Reconditioning/Overlay 1. Main Street 2. North Dakota Street 3. SW 94th Avenue KPFF/City 4. SW Fairview Court Engineer: Stu Cato 5. SW Fairview Lane Phone: 227-3251 6. SW 116th Place 7. SW Commercial Street 8. SW 68th Parkway PROJECT CONSULTING ENGINEER I. STREETS (Continued) B. Reconstruction/New Construction 1, SW North Dakota Street McKenzie/City (From SW 90th to SW 93rd) Engineer: Dave Larson Phone: 224-9560 21 SW 104th Avenue Lee Engineering (From SW McDonald to Engineer: Duane Lee 200' North) Phone: 655-1342 3. SW Commercial Street Lee Engineering (From SW 98th to SW 95th) Engineer: Duane Igoe Phone: 655-1342 4. SW Tiedeman Realignment McKenzie/City (Near Fowler Jr. High) Engineer: Dave Larson Phone: 224--9560 5. SW No. Dakota Realignment DeHaas & Associatias (at SW 1.15ti, Ave.) Engineer: Marlin ()Haas Phone: 682-24`>0 6. SW Hunziker Street Realignment DeHaas & Associates (At SW Hall Blvd.) Engineer: Marlin DeHaas Phone: 682--2450 7. SW Main Street Bridge P.O. Report "Not Assigned." C. Signalization 1. Greenburg/Tiedeman R.A.Wright Engineer: Bob Wright Phone: 246-4293 State Highway Division Engineer: Wayne Schulte Phone: 653-3229 2. Scholls Ferry Rd/No. Dakota State Highway Division Engineer: Wayne Schulte Phone: 653-3229 Page 3 3. Hall Blvd./Burnham KPFF Engineering Engineer: Stu Cato Phone: 227-3251 State Highway Division Engineer: Wayne Schulte Phone: 653-3229 4. Hall Blvd./McDonald State Highway Division Engineer: Wayno Schulte Phone: 653-3229 D. Right-of-way Acquisition 1. SW Commercial Street Lee Engineering (From SW 98th Ave. to Engineer: Duane Lee SW 95th Avenue) Phone: 655-1342 PROJECT CONSULTING ENGINEER 2. SW Tiedeman Ave. Realignment McKenzie/City (Near Fowler Jr. High) Engineer: Dave Larson Phone: 224-9560 3. SW No. Dakota Realignment DeHaas 6 Associates At SW 115th Avenue) Engineer: Marlin DeHaas Phone: 682-2450 4. SW 79th Avenue Realignment Burton Engineering (At SW Bonita Road) Engineer: Tom Burton Contribution Only-Mara Woods Phone: 639-6116 Subdivision II. WASTEWATER A. Sanitary Sewer 1 . "Triangle" trunk P.E. Report "ON HOLD" 2. Master Plan Study "ON HOLD" 3. SW 69th Ave. Extension Development Construction Svc , (From SW Hampton to SW Gonzaga) City/John Peterson 4. O.E.A. Access Paths City ("Triangle") Operations 5. Pinebrook Repair City (West of Hall) Operations 6. Watkins Repair City (North of Derry Dell) Operations B. Storm Drainage 1. Cascade Avenue Drainage KPFF Engineering Engineer: Stu Cato F Phone: 227-3251 Page 4 loth;. WN 4 2. Canterbury/Gaarde Drainage Development Construction Svc. Engineer: John Peterson Phone: 648-4959 t 3. "Gentle Woods Channel McKenzie/City Reinforcement Engineer: Dave Larson Phone: 224--9560 The four projects that have not been assigned are: 1. SW Main Street Bridge P.E. Study (Includes Main Street Reconditioning Project). 2. SW 135th Avenue L.I.D. 3. Triangle Trunk Sanitary Sewer P.E. Study. 4. Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Study. 2138P Page S i r TIGAR M CO EOMIC DEVEL yP 21NT COMM ITTEE I MEMBERS PRESENT: John Savory, Amo DeBernardis, Pat Kennedy, Dick Cochran, Jim Corlis, Kathy Budney OTHERS PRESENT: Lee Hames, Geraldine Ball, Mary Bross, Dee Dee Harrington, Deborah Stuart, Bill Monahan The minutes of the December 17, 1985 meeting were reviewed and approved as written. John and Bill gave an update of the status of the downtown non-profit organization formation. Don Hanson was unable to attend the meeting, however, � he has been active circulating surveys to businesses to determine their interest. Bill displayed a map which delineated the proposed boundaries of the d w town, including commercial areas on Pacific Highway. Amo and Pat suggested Tigard Plaza and Park 217 be included as well as First Ithat nterstate Bank. Bill John reported that the will develop a few concepts for the area for review. ea as its present lease Chamber is considering a relocation to the downtown ar arrangement is up. Bill noted that the Main Street bridge has been added to the City's Capital Improvement Program. Engineering will be completed in year one. A memo from City Administator Bob Jean was discussed which describes his If a downtown organization is formed and commitment to the downtown area. joins the Main Street Program, he would support the following: ation of the 1 ParklPlannfor thetion and entire Downtown area as a city-wide tpark. . . Creek 2, Engineering and construction funding of those projects identified but not yet authorized on the 18 month CIP list. . . 3. Discounted lease rates for the Old City Hall if based jointly to the Chamber, Downtown Association, and I-5 Corridor Association. . . 4. Finally, if 50% or more of the eligible merchants first year cash Association, I'd propose that the City fund a $10,0 grant, a $7,000 second year and $4,000 third year grant. The Committee was encouraged by the committment. Amo proposed that the Committee get together as soon as possible with Don Hanson Tto he C mmatteei Of the memo and to determine the next steps necessary. discussed whether the Main Street Program was nee ting the or the regroup of the to be successful. Bill endorsed the program by program and the technical support available from successful operations i other communities. He noted that Katie Brand, director of the Forest Grove program. ness Forest had indicated c a willingAmo suggestedrthat meeting also discuss theprogress to u othss e program Grove with business people. John will contact Don Hanson so that tie and Bill can get together with Don to discuss the formation of the downtown organization. Lee Hames of Tri Met described plans for the new transit center scheduled for completion in 1986 on Commercial Street. A conditional use permit was granted for the center to locate on the site of the Tigard Auto Body in 1987. That permit has lapsed so new designs are being prepared for a new submittal. The plan will include the present Greyhound building, a canopied area for bus patrons, possibly leased space for businesses which are service oriented to bus patrons. landscaped areas, and area to accomodate bus loading and storage. The plan will be similar to the Beaverton station. The plans must be reviewed by the Fedoral Government also. Lee pointed out that funds are committed to the project and are not affected by the Gramm-Redman Act. State lottery funds are also committed to the project, as well as a 20% local match provided by the former property owner, Dick Kadel. Discussion centered on the need for parking affiliated with the center. Tri Met is now exploring sites in Tigard for Park and Ride facilities. Downt in parking lots committed to all-day parking of transit customers is not envisioned, nor is it compatible with downtown needs. Locations on Barbur and Pacific Highway are being reviewed. Tri Met is looking for 3 to 4 acre sites t as they can accomodate 100 cars per acre. The Prairie Market site, althought in the Downtown, was suggested for evaluation. John raised the issue that one on street drop-off space was inadequate, given present use at the bus stop in front of the former Zoop's store. Lee pointed out that the plans presented are preliminary and could be changed prior to submittal for a conditional use permit. At the time of submittal materials, (� landscaping, paving, and design will be firmed up. She noted that efforts will be made to make the facility vandal-proof. Benches, public telephones, lighting and bike racks will be added. No public restrooms are planned. The Metro Solid Waste Transfer station was discussed. John's letter to METRO was among those submitted in opposition to locating the facility in Tigard. METRO dropped the site from consideration. No developers were present to discuss plans for development. Other Business - John noted that Tony Orlandini hs resigned from the Committee, due to the fact that his business is no longer in Tigard. John asked for assistance in locating a possible replacement, preferably someone with a business on Pacific Highway. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 A.M. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, _ February 18, 1986, at 7:30 A.M. at Pioneer Pies. (WAM:br43) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: William A. Monahan, January 15, 1986 Director of Community Development K,01—FROM: Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager '� SUBJECT: Engineering Monthly Report for December, 1986 Function Personnel Time in Function December I. Private Development Services 7% A. Land-Use Application review . B. Improvement Permits (Subvd., half-street, sewer & Delg. projects . . . 20% C. Public/Agency assistance 8% D. Property Vacations . . . 0% II. Geographic Information Services A. Mapping and Records . • 21% B. Survey and Design 1. P.W. Maint. Projects . . . OX 2. City Wide Control . . . 11% 3. Capital Project Engineering . . . OX III.CaRital Development Services A. Public Fac. Master Plan review and update 1% B. C.I.P. and L.I.D. Admin. assistance 2% C. Street C.I.P. assistance. . . . OX IV. General Admin. & Misc. Personnel Reviews, training, staff meetings, Citizen committee support, Section management, Budget prep. , union meetings, Computer Master Plan, etc.... 14X A. Urban Services Study (Metzger) 1% V. Non-productive time (Holidays, vacations sick leave etc. 15% 1101mil I I VI.Revenue Activity FY 84-85 FY 85-86 A. Engineering Service Fees & Charges DECEMBER DECEMBER 1. Improvement Permits (I.B) 579.24 334.00 thru DECEMBER thru DECEMBER 18,952.21 60,688.30 B. Public Works Operations Fees & Charges FY 84-85 FY 85-86 A December December 1. Streetlights . . . • • • • . • • • • 220.32 - 0 - 2. Traffic control Signing - 0 - - 0 - NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS DECEMBER 1. A & B Heating Frank Aazman - street opening permit - SW 72nd Ave. 2. Davidson Rental & Car Wash - Public Storm Drain, Pacific Highway & Walnut (RSC:br/0840P) � 2 J N c ' I I i 'ITNI r-T I 1 ¢ ,Np i In M I t 1+1 en i d. In 1 I � s I t» t h 1 WN N N I a � 0I o wI i al e0+) �I n� C, '1 1D n' .-+I N OJ �1 _ I 0 i I O I N �G 1 � "•� { �' .. I a• P; n( O i N n O ( •^i P; a0 _ ... !•,•� .A) P P W rn I n P N M h col ( y N P1 J( b 1' b Pr o n n, aD ao o ; 7 /'•f I b J 60 i I CO( C4,I ~ r N b 00I N b I ,h OND I ^I I I O( O O iN `" I � i i ti b P I 1 W P J I �I Nm J b � C4 N P P m n b n W m b N N 1 i i� 11 1 �O � i S m co IN «r M1 ^ N N ^ I Vb1 0 N WN 1N ! i 6 -1 N J 06 O N , J P, b a0 �n I 1r1 N I N I M I C �I ^' •� C I rw. a) w l a a a aw I H 4 •.1 �•1( N M M N u 1 VI J •1 JI J N �? J W� N N JI J Y Y ! u u cn a W Y � JC .CS .C� Z Y 4 O( t t n9I '0 L r F 1 s •,•- a o ; 1� N n N N O NN� b 1)) O OI o7 ' O 110 m a0 n b m O m O cc N N N. N N t�A NI NI D Y m d� V •n.. O u = 19 O N N N N I t�•1 o ! W i � o d a -77 a v C ch f I me i c ci x , s u N O C a+ 0 1 s H a o I r w ! a ; w u ? o 0 0. 0. a� � S M o� •o j � 1 O N � !,,. C � N N •O N N N r 2 N W i: � = 10 %0 i qimim •C m P d N N p ! H � v M C tai e m °o w Q M •• w n mo o:+ o m o r n 1 Y ro ' m a0 6 e0 — Ci O °! E.1 I 1 W 9 4 1 .+ a ° u N y W H ..1 N V N ro ro u d ro !. o s a a m u N ro u y > > �• vN > i O C T N lu O '-f H y W nr W 67 U V O U C q N N n F t/7 6 n n !C CD CO a0 N F CO w 10 a � E ., - N N n w ^i v v 1 , mom f' -M � ^ N OI N V1 O O a WJ ti M m cn C0Qq .O U -M m I M C .M+1 p n m M r� a M M N i m •. 1 G —O� G� 1 0m I i= la i ! Iii -4� i 1 , Z ) 1 C-0 z, v. u�i alll � of vpii vi) amo` o LA �v a o p yl a a, �j ml I oil I �. of o�I nI ao� mo� n' Nft �nNf l VM11� mNi'j Ncol 14 MM� �N!I M^t M co.p 0010 rn coC71 C, 1! . �O 1 ,n i u•1 N N a.l 0 1 10 ,hn In,fn 0, MO OR a P � V ) r. � ma.» C OI .� i P P: 0;ufl �` .O� Mf N C� m N %0 N1 n a1 VZ M mI mi M u1 ,A a I .O O QO 01 — N. lit n! 1 PC O .�,1 a hl pal h' V1! hi ,n1 M N P, N m! ' ^� V 4 C� 1 _ 1 � f ..o. w� w w w 1 I � I � I o y y L' a: aa N r a a a a a a a c.f al a w a1 s' ml u• d F. .O iy•�• I f I � I N A' 9 d m( w l d dl W wl w y N O Oft NI w d1 w) d( d wI �. w 4cnoL� L .-, L O L '+ ta! - C71 O c v a v w �l O 1 NI m1 N ! n n n m V! n cr eN .. � r. �—1 — nln..sin n �, n n i-.1 �: n i I , i 14 'C: d n 'J , N 7 - I rJI el `yt N r"1 v O O ( h t �' I i •1 i 1 1 f iii 1i 1 I 1 ! 1 ( ti o p+ 7 "l 1� u1 N f C d OC1Icn Men V: CIO r I `• ^.f p N h 4 Ln -.4 1 1 .-r p M N a% O� N 1. en M �� 1� .J 'b >r' NI a+ M N' In � co00 � h� GO U ml M� h I i w 1 ' 1 tr t I 1 1 1 1 i C � f c 1 rn W { M y co M h .r to O f � fT ! 0�0► 0%3�3 1n M � f N ID co %D %D N I 1 ,rl NI N 11111 + NI N •"' S 1 ' t wt r • La a I ;> 2: '01L] A 1 vi C*t -0 F 7 H w 1-•+ s � 1 i" { i E ' 00OO 1-4 O s —4 N E ! ..r a ON Ln %O 00 Cl C; C4f a p c 0 F N O O M %a 00 a w V1 r+ N i a O N O M O '+ Iz O M n F ^ a Ln O M O a; co Ln Ch N � .moi 00 �7 H 6 >- a 00 a O ON r M N a Ln �7 N p n a -.7 o O ZOc. �.I .fir O .C11NIT7 O F 14 Q a Oad I ! I w � ;r, v :t a C4 •• m 0w c vs c ..a s.i •.+ ' u'1 00 O N .� C Q •-� + N S o Ln H I i OoN NI I �a O O u a Q1 I a M me-+ ... O co — M w M O a O a N W O co M O -T .4 N a , Li p � i tl7 L1I.a L y 4 W to +4 a.7 Q) C O c Aj m O rJ u m m ri Cd to a m a cd O w a o c. oG a Ix a4 0 x w H MONTHLY REPORT Cl T'GA� WASHINGiCN COUNTY.OREGON DATE: 1/13/86 FOR MONTH OF:__ December_1985____ OPERATIONS OFFICE: 1 WASTE WATER: 2. 1.2 1 158.0 Hrs T.V. Inspection 88.5 Hrs Sanitary Sewer Clean 1.0 Hr Storm Drain Clean 74.75 Hrs Santiary Repairs I 4.0 Hrs Catch Basin 68.5 Hrs Manhole Repairs 4.0 Hrs Flooding Maintenance gkg 9.0 Hrs Storm Drain Repair t STREETS 2. 1.3 66.5 Hrs. Street Cleaning 47.0 Hrs Patching 8.5 Hrs Painting & Street Marking 282.0 Hrs Sign Maintenance 85.0 Hrs Brushing & Limbing 16.0 Hrs Grading & Rocking 2,5 Hrs Bridge Maintenance 60.0 Hrs Sanding PARKS 2.1.4 Green Thumb Labor 10.0 Hrs Irrigation 10,0 Hrs Building Maint. 4.0 Hrs Building Maint. 113,25 Hrs Landscaping 128.0 Hrs Landscaping 1.0 Hr Trails Maint. 5.0 Hrs Trails Maint. 15.0 Hrs Construction 6.0 Hrs Construction 59.75 Hrs Litter Maint. 5.0 Hrs Litter Maint. SUPPORT SERVICES 2.1.5 14.0 Hrs PM on Equipment 158.5 Scheduled Repair 7.5 Hrs Unsched. Repair 32.0 Hrs Fabrication 22.25 Hrs General Support —. _ ---- 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:6.39-4171 1/13/86 PARK MAINTENANCE REPORT For Month of: December 1985 There was a total of 223.5 maintenance hours at COOK PARK, with 10.0 hours irrigation maintenance, 143.5 hours landscaping, 10.0 hours trails mainten- ance, 17.0 hours construction and 43.0 hours litter maintenance. CITY EMPLOYEES GREEN THUMB LABOR Irrigation maintenance 10.0 Landscaping 70.5 73.0 Trails maintenance 8.0 2.0 Construction 13.0 4.0 Litter maintenance 43.0 Bus Stops: 13.75 City Hall: 8.0 En glewoo d: 1.0 Fanno Creek Park: 3.75 Jack Park: 41.25 36.0 Liberty: .5 Main: 1.0 Pacific-99 Walkway: 4.0 1.0 8ummerlake: 5.25 Woodard: 8.0 8.0 r e PLANNNING AND DEVELOPMENT t REVENUE REPORT CITY PLANNis.G HEARINGS DIRECTOR"S DOCUMENT MONTHLY REVENUES COUNCIL COMMISSION OFFICER DECISION SALES Totals from July 1985 $450.00 $ 350.00 $1,000.00 $1,415.00 $187,35 GT ($3,402.35) Totals from Aug. 1985 150.00 3,200.00 -0- 2,715.00 94.65 GT ($6,159.65) Totals from Sept. 1985 -0- -0- -0- 675.00 229,30 GT($ 904.30) Totals from Oct. 1985 --0- 930.00 500.00 675.00 173.80 GT ($2,278.80) Total from Nov. 1985 -0- -0- 800.00 1,315.00 150.40 GT ($2,265.40) DECEMBER Applicant Receipt # `- Koll 9132 220.00 (M) Gurvetz 9254 200.0O(SCE) Columbia Equities 9272 2000.00(CPA/ZCA) Toni Trimmer 9259 75.00 (HOP) Pac Trust 9310 300.00 (MLP/M) Macadam Forbes 9591 220.00 (M) Westlake Con 9592 30(1.00 (MLP) M. Custer Ford 9630 300.00 (SDR) Larry White 9770 75.00 (HOP) Sall Janich 9631 300.00(appeal CU) Document Sales Misc 85.75 Plan Document Sales Misc. 127.25 Eng December Totals 2300.00 200.00 -0- 1,490.00 213.00 GT ($4,203.00) TOTALS TO DATE: $2,900.00 $4,680.00 $2,300.00 $8,285.00 $1,048.00 YTD ($19,213.50) FYTD — November 1985 t PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS DIRECTOR"S DECISIONS 8 CPA Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Also CC) 10 MLP Minor Land Partition 3 ZC Zone Change 11 SDR Site Development Review 4 ZCA Zone Change Annexation (CC) 8 V Variance 5 ZOA Zone Ordinance Amendment (Also CCO 5 TU Temporary Use 1 PD Planned Development 21 HOP Home Occupation 1 1 S Subdivision 10 M Misc. (Lot Line Adj . flexible setbacks) 2 SCE Sign Code Exception HEARINGS OFFICER DECISIONS 3 SL Sensitive Lands Permit 3 CU Conditional Use WM:bs8 TI:GARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - DECEMDLR 3, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut — LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Peterson, Vanderwood, Newman, Owens, and Fyre (arrived 9:00 PM). Absent: Commissioners Bergmann and Leverett. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote of members present. Commissioners Newman and Owens abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION There was no communication. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 REVIEW LARRY SCHMIDT'S APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT' TO NPO # 5 _ o Mr. Schmidt was unable to attend because of a conflict. He called staff and requested they explain to the Commissioners why he would like to become and member and asked that the Commission forward his application to City Council for appointment. o Commissioner Vander-wood stated that she knew Mr. Schmidt and supported his appointment to NPO # 5. Discussion followed. Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to forward Larry Schmidt's application to City Council with a recommendation for appointment. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.2 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 11-85, VARIANCE V 17-85 BEND. FRAN. DEV./TOM MILLER MARY BURNHAM NPO # 6 Appeal of the Director's decision. Located: within the Solarcrest Subdivision, at the southwest corner of Elrose Street and 97th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 11BA lots 4900, 5600, and 5700) . Senior Planner Liden explained that the applicant had worked out a tentative agreement, however, if the agreement did not work out staff would like this item set over to the January 7th, 1986, public hearing so that staff would not have to readvertise if the agreement should happen to fall apart. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — DECEMBER 3, 1985 — PAGE 1 Mary Burnt ani was present and requc!st.ed that Lhe Planning Conuni.ssi.oner scat. over the hearing to the January meeting. c Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to postpone M 11-85 and V 11-85 to January 7th, 1986. 5.3 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 4-85 CONDITIONAL USE CU 5-85, VARIANCE V 18-85 NEAL CONSER NPO # b erty zoned C—G (PD). Also a Conditional Use for a mini--warehouse on prop Variance to reduce the off—street Hi hw�yparking (WCTM 2S1rIOD,tlot 1800) to 4 spaces. Located 15700 SW Pacific 5 Y lamed that the Conditional Use was coming before Senior Planner Liden exp ert Staff the Planning CammissioQfbeD Ove thesCof the onditional Use landay o theVariancewith 11 recommended approval - € k conditions. President Moen stated that Willaminia Lumber Co. , however,he owners he dl not the property, where clients of his employer, Coe Mfg. , feel there e would participate in the was a conflict of interest so h t hearing. APPLICANT`S PRESENTATION 0690 SW Bancroft, Portland, OR 97201, { o Lance Stout, MacKenzie/Saito, had addressed all the applicant, explained how they t representing the app Planned Develoment, and Variance, He criteria for a Conditional Use, ! explained that the applicant had done extensive investigation rand this location, visibility, good access, compatibility, and topography site met all their needs. This use would createless They had general. commercial use which would make them a go exceeded most of the buffering requirements. They had reviewed the staff report and had no objectquestions.ions and he was available to answer 18858 Allegheny Ct. . Oregon City, OR, 97045, reviewed past o Neal Conser, proposed projects that they had constructed. He showed a drawing t project and mini-storage, stating that this would be a high q6, the pSummerfield constructed with brick. He had met with NPO # supported the t Association, and Tualatin Development CO'i turenpas yof hthealareaand letters project. He submitted a folder of p supporting the project. He read into the posed tie requested that the reviewed the landscaping which is being pro p Commission approve the proposal. PUBLIC TESTIMONY NPO # 6 Chairman, supported the proposal. He personally o Phil presse , licant had done on this was immpressed with the investigation that the app project. o Jane Miller, 10920 SW Highland, Tigard, representing the Summerfield Civic Association, was in favor of the proposal and asked for approval. She is also a member of NPO # 6. t 1 1985 PAGE 2 PLANNING CtMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 3, - E o Rocky Conser, 6580 NW Mt. View Dr. Corvallis, Or 97330, brother of the applicant, commented on why the Variance for the parking spaces should be allowed. o Susan Quick, 101 SW Main St. Portland, (Ball, Janik, Novack attorneys), representing Durham 99 Association, owners of the property to the south. known as the Summerfield Center, opposed the proposal. They were concerned that a mini-warehouse was more an industrial use than a commercial use, that it would decrease property values, that there was not enough adequate buffering and that a cyclone fence would not be aesthetically pleasing. Their building was constructed of glass and would look directly at the proposed project which would consist of asphalt and garage doors. o Paul Challancin, 23803 150th St. , Monroe, Washington, explained that they had purchased the Summerfield Center about four months ago and had invested a considerable amount of money to do major landscaping and rejuvenation of the project including establishing a •k site. He explained that Bldg. "C" was constructed of glass and had a 10 to 15 foot setback from the property line; and would look directly at the mini—warehouse. He admitted the project was more attractive than most but it was still a mini—storage. He did not feel he had enough information to support the proposal. o Susan Quick, submitted a letter from Curtis, Mackenzie & Slocom, Inc. who had been asked to review the impact that the mini—storage would have on her client's project. She requested that the Commission consider these impacts and deny the application. REBUTTAL o Lance Stout, questioned whether the mini—storage should be considered a industrial use. He felt it was more of a commercial use. He continued that they had gone beyond the required amount of landscaping but where willing to work with the adjacent property owners to provide adequate landscaping. He doubted that the County Assessors would decrease the value of surrounding properties. He asked that the Commission to consider what the effect on the value of adjacent properties would be if someone with less consideration for buffering would develop the site. o Phil Pasteris, NPO # 6 Chairperson, suggested that another color besides silver could be used for the cyclone fence. o Rocky Conser, stated that the fence along the front of the property would be constructed of wrought iron. Discussion followed regarding the fence. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Butler was concerned that since this was a CG zone that the mini—storage would allow business to operate out of the storage areas. Senior Planner Liden stated that the existing Code prohibited that from happening. Discussion followed. DECEMBER 3, 1985 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — — o Lengthy discussion followed regarding the landscaping and fencing. o President Moen favored the proposal if condition number 10 was changed to require that type 8 vegetation be used on the southern boundary. Also, that a condition be included that stated the site would be constructed of brick and that the 25' foot of natural buffering along the back be maintained. o Commissioner Peterson concurred with President. Moen and suggested that the urought iron fence go along the southern boundary just past the existing building. o Commissioner Owens felt the vegetation should be upgraded to allow for immediate visual buffering. She felt the mini-storage user would also use the Willowbrook Center. She was concerned that the wrought iron fence would .rause a security problem if it was extended along the southern boundary. o Commissioner Butler requested a condition be placed in the final order stating that no business shall be allowed to operate within the mini-warehouse. o Commissioner Newman supported Commissioner Owens' comments. Discussion followed regarding the landscaping and the cyclone fence. Commissioner Fyre arrived 9:00 P.M. Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to approve PU 4-85, CU 5-85, and V 18-85 per staff's recommendation and findings; modifying condition number 10 to change buffering along the southern boundary from A 6 C to type 8; and adding the following conditions: 12. That the mini-storage would be constructed of brick. 13 . That the fenra along the front of the project would be constructed of wrought iron. 14. That no businesses would be allowed to operate within the mini-warehouse. 15. That the 25 foot of natural vegetation along the eastern boundary would be perpetually maintained or replaced if destroyed. Also, to direct staff to prepare the final order and for President Moen to sign off on that final order. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present, Commissioner Fyre abstained. 9:15 Recess Commissioner Vanderwood left. 9:30 Reconvened f PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 3, 1985 - PAGE 4 5.4 COMPREFIEN'SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1.5--85 7.ONE ORDINANCE AMhNDMENT 7-OA 9 -85 Section 18. 104+FUE1. TANK INSTALLATIONS o Lengthy discussion followed regarding what hydro—carbon oil is, whether these should be conditional uses, and what the fire departments responses was. Consensus was to gather more information and input Prom the fire districts. Section 18.146 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT LOTS o Senior Planner Liden modified staff proposal under the Approval Criteria by adding 5. The proposed addition shall not encroach upon any existing easements. Changing number 5 to 6, to read: When the proposed addition is within the rear yard, the area adjacent to the rear property line shall. be landscaped with • irlht obscuring plantings in accordance with the standards set forth in 18.1.:::.080 (LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING); and changing number 6 to number 7. o Consensus of the Commission was to support the proposed changes 18.100.110 (c) Screening of Swimming Pools o Consensus of the Commissioner was to support staff's proposal. 18.66.030 Add Religious Assembly as a Permitted Use. i a Discussion followed as to whether this was appropriate in the CBD zone:. Consensus was to support staff's proposal. Commissioner Owens left 10:00 P.M. 18.32.130 (a)(1)(0) Procedures for Decision Making: Quasi—Judicial o After lengthy discussion, consensus of the Commission was to require notice to be 250' for all applications. 18.144.020 Accessory Uses and Structures o Consensus of the Commission was to support staff's proposal. 18.80.015 (c) The Process (Planned Development) o Consensus of the Commission was to modify staff' s proposal as underlined below: "In the case of an existing Planned Development overlay cone the applicant may choose to have a land use [the Overlay Zone] application reviewed under the provisions of this Chapter or to employ the review procedure required in other chapter which apply to the particular land use application." r� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 3, 1985 — PAGE 5 / o The Commissioner expressed the desire to hear Site Development Reviews, tl Conditional Uses, and Minor Land Partitions which have a PD overlay. 18.114.130 (c)(2)(A) Wall Signs in Commercial Zones o Lengthy discussion followed on what effect this would have if a building was constructed with staggered walls. The Commission requested staff to do more investigation. 18.84.050 (a)(5) Approval Standards for Sensitive Lands o Consensus of the Commission was that a bond or monies should be received when it is not feasible to construct the bicycle Path. The Commission requested that staff investigate establishing a fund for bicyrl- paths. 18.84.040 (a)(7) Add New Section o The Commission modified the proposal to requir that land remaining within the 100 year flood plain boundary shall be dedicated to the public. 18.60,040(6), 18.62.030(1)(E), 18.64.030(1)(E), 18.66.030(1)(E), 18.68.030(1)(8), 18.70.030(1)(C), 18.72.030(1)(0); change "parking services" to "parking facilities". o Consensus of the Commission was to support staff's proposal. POLICY 7.1.2 a. 2. (Page 4 of Findings, policies, and Implementation Strategies document. o Consensus of the Commission was to support staff's proposal. * Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Newman seconded to forward CPA 15-85 and ZOA 9-85 to City Council with a recommendation of approval with their modifications. Also, that staff provide the Commissioners with a copy of the proposal that will be sent to City Council so that they may make additional comments on items of concern. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. 6. Other Business o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Fjre seconded for staff to contact Commissioner Owens and make corrections to the minutes on items that she had commented on. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. 7. Meeting Adjourned 10:25 P.M. Diane M. Jelderks, Secretary ATTEST: A. Donald Moen, President 2215P s dmf PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — DECEMBER 3, 1985 — PAGE 6 v s i Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee Minutes of the December 5, 1985 Meeting Present: Tom Sullivan (Chair), Mark Padgett (Vice Chair), Lidija Balodis, Milt Fyre, Joe Schweitz (late) , Wilbur Bishop (late) and Dennis Hummel. Guests: Geraldine Ball abd Allen Troyer. The meeting was called to order by Chair Tom Sullivan at 7:05 p.m. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved. Tom introduced Allen Troyer from ODOT to discuss signalization on Pacific Hwy. Mark began the discussion by asking if what is now in place is the best, most modern system available or if it could be better. Allen responded that the controllers are fairly new, they are the most modern and they are the standard. Lidija asked if the system is speed based. Allen answered yes, but that all lights are traffic actuated. They are semi-actuated between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. and totally traffic actuated after 7:00 p.m. in accordance with the chart Allen distributed. The system is not perfect. Everyone expressed concern with the lack of timing in the system. Allen said that with the traffic actuated system, perfect timing is t impossible because of side street traffic. Time based clocks lose synchroni- 11 zation and several cycles are required before it is regained. In the next 3 months, the time clocks on 99W will be interconnected via hard wire which should be an improvement over the current situation. Tom asked what the f pedestrian signals do to the system. Allen explained that they lengthen the green light in the pedestrian crossing direction. Pedestrians are allowed 1 second per 4 feet curb to curb. This contributes to further throwing the system out of synchronization. Joe asked if a mechanical system would be better. The answer was a definite no. When the hard wiring of the clocks is completed, we will have the most modern, efficient system available, I th ink. Wilbur and Mark explained the impact the proposed garbage transfer site would have on the Hunziker and Hall Streets area. Following lengthy discus- sion, Mark moved that Tom write a letter from the committee addressed to the city council, Metro, The Times and The Oregonian stating the problems associated with the proposed site. Joe seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Mark brought up half street versus centerline improvement. He asked the county why they switched from half street to centerline and was pre sen ted with some information. He then asked if this is an issue we should study. Lidija asked why not require full street improvements. The general answer was too many problems associated with different owners. Lidija expressed reconcern with variances granted and the problems they create. Milt moved that Mark set up a speaker from Washington County on half street improvements for a future meeting. Tom seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Joe discussed current light rail and bus proposals. Several changes are going on and he will set up a presentation for a future meeting whenever the `. committee desires. s =OEE Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee Minutes of the December 5, 1985 Meeting rr ' Page 2 1 . Milt explained what the Southwest Corridor study is doing. Both he and Tom are on the Citizens Advisory Committee and they will be bringing items before our committee in the future. The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m. t r r'. DH/9sa6A8 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: February 4, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Notice of Decision SDR 1-86 Westlake Consultants PREPARED BY: Community Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: saaasassmaamasaaasaasamaasa ass s asaaasaa ssaxsasxs o sass xxmasaxssaxasasaaa asssasaas POLICY ISSUE sssass:sossasassaassaasassass:aaaaasaaaaxsaxaasaaasasaasaaxasacaasaaxaaxaca ass= INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the Notice of Decision for SDR 1-86 for Westlake Consultants for a Site Development Review on property zoned C-G for the purpose of constructing an automotive lubrication facility (Minit-Lube) on a portion of the site, located at 13935 SW Pacific Highway. ss=:ssgsssssssssssssssasaassssssssssssssasssssaaasasasassasaassasssssssaasssaas ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and file. 2. Motion to remove from consent agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. muss�asssssas�asss�ssas�a�saasassassaaasasmsasasssamaaassaaxassaaaaasaaaassasa SUGGESTED ACTION Receiveandfile. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 1-86 1, APPLICATION: A request by Westlake Consultants (Aldo Rossi) for a Site Development Review on property zoned C-G for the purpose of constructing an automotive lubrication facility (Minit-Lube) on a portion of the site. Located 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 30D Lot 1000). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has been APPROVED subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background In 1977, Richard A. Cooper requested a Conditional Use Permit to locate a used car lot in a C-3 (1977 General Commercial) zone but "Retail Commercial" in the NPO #3 plan. His request was approved and later in April 1978 extended until May, 1978 subject to the fulfillment of conditions. In July, 1977 Mr. Cooper requested a Site Development Review for the used car lot. SDR 19-77 was approved but conditions were not met. In September the applicant was cited for a zoning violation and violations of state law which was related to closure of a southern access point. A request for a minor land partition in January, 1986 was approved subject to certain conditions. The decision was made final on January 27, 1986. 2. Vicinity Information The properties to the west are zoned R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) and are developed with single family residences. Properties to the north, wouth and east are zoned C-G (General-Commercial). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The subject property is utilized as a used car lot with a mobile office near the center. One driveway entrance is situated near the northeast corner of the parcel. The applicant proposes to construct a Minit-Lube facility on one of 3 newly created tax lots. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District had the following comment: The site plans are found acceptable as shown and are in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Article 10. A disclaimer was provided to indicate that their approval is not an approval of omissions or oversights by the Fire District. NOTICE OF DECISION - SOR 1-86 - PAGE 1 r �- The State Highway Division had the following comments: An access permit will be required by the Oregon Department of Transportation. The proposed single access to the three parcels is appropriate but the driveway width shown could be 40 feet. The skew of the driveway as it intersects Pacific Highway will restrict automobiles making a left turn. An on-site modification of the driveway has been suggested to improve the angle with the street. The Engineering Services Division had the following comments: a. A State Highway Division street opening permit should be secured by the applicant prior to commencing of any work within the Pacific Highway right-of-way. b. An easement should be provided to the City by the applicant for the mainline sewer facilities, the easement documents shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Division. No comments were received from NFO #3. 0. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed site plan for the Minit--Lube facility is consistent with Community Development Code requirements for additional setback requirements, visual clearance area, landscaping and screening, and access and egress. As of January 29, 1986, MLP 19-85 has not been recorded as required by its conditions of approval with the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SDR 1-86 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. Seven (7) set of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 3. Sanitary sewer and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 1-86 - PAGE 2 • 4. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. Said agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED. 5. An access permit must be obtained from the Oregon Department of Transportation. 6. A State Highway Division street opening permit shall be secured by the applicant prior to the onset of any work within the Pacific Highway right-of-way. 7. An easement shall be provided to the City by the applicant for the mainline sewer facilities, the easement documents shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Division. 8. Applicant must successfully record the new lots associated with MLP 19-85 with the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation prior to issuance of building permits. 9. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XXX The applicant 6 owners XXX Owners of record within the required distance XXX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XXX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON February 13, 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. !� ea1: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 2:30 P.M. 2-13-86 4. questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW sh, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 9743,, 639-4171. 639-4171. elef (6 P EPR E BY: D orah Stuart, Assistant Planner DATE /tiB& Willi m A. Monahan, Director of planning 6 Development DATE�APPROVEO (DAS:bs89) r i t t i _ ��.�'.�:M.,�-_�• ` 1, - : .�� op L MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council January 21, 1986 FROM: Jerri L Widner, Finance Director SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY - DECEMBER During the month of December, the City received 7,175 telephone: calls and had 2,200 walk-ins. Word processing handled 9,042 pages of information with an average turn-around time of 6 hours. Accounting processed 477 checks during December. Sewer bills totaled 1493 with total receipts of 1,488. Cash. receipts written by reception totaled 654. There were 47 purchase orders processed during December. There were three recruitments and one hiring during December. Attached is the claims report for the month. r y /,Z CITY OF 1I13ARD 1 CI AIM ".1WW. RI PORI DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESI:RIPIION STATUS 2/13/05 Mervin Boen False arrest pending 8/21/84 George Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity (Officers Johnson, Ober, 6 Newman) 2/4/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open (Officer Nal Merrill) 3/20/83 Fred Ozan False arrest closed w/o payment (Officer Killion) 1/11/85 Harry Field Alleges False Arrest pending (Office Merrill) Unknown George Hludaik Alleges his constitutional pending rights violated Unknown Neil. Gerrard Alleges his constitutional pending rights were violated "20/85 Steven Bacon False Arrest (Officer Harburg) claim reopened r16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending 9/6/85 Farmers Ins. etal Alleges officers caused pending panic stop (Officer Jim Newman) 10/16/85 Opal Kaske Failed to yield right-of-way pending 9/24/85 Henninia Arias Tripped & fell on sidewalk pending 12/6/85 Cpl Johnson Diamaged vehicle when parking pending 11/26/65 Lujon Apt.s St�wor backup pending (DH:pm/0886F) € Tl A D► iroLIBRAKY PUBLm.phone 639-9511 12568 SW Main•Tigard, Or.97223 MONTHLY REPORT December 1985 TO: LIBRARY BOARD CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN WCCLS: The professional board continues to work together setting policy and pro- cedures for the automated circulation system. At two meetings of the city managers, librarians and Citizens Advisory Board, the question of who should pay for the op- erating and maintenance costs was discussed and unresolved. It was decided that normal slippage of the projected time lin, ,could probably reduce the first year's costs. Discussion has just about produced consensus that a replacement cost should not be established during the current levy inasmuch as that was not in the original planning. The Citizens Advisory Board has voted to recommend signing the automation vendor's contract. The governance issue remains unresolved to the satisfaction of the cities. Nevertheless, the CAB has voted to recommend to the Washington Board of County Commissioners that a library district be formed in the unincorporated area of the County. In spite of the delay in signing a new services contract, the city re- ceived its first payment for the 1985-86 levy. Rotary Project: Library Board chairman, Walt Munhall, and Librarian met with Tom Taylor and Denis Borman to discuss a suitable recognition plaque in the young adult area. Business Women's Forum: Librarian made a presentation to the Tigard Area Business Women's Forum on December 11 regarding plans for the new library building. «- Personnel: Dan Stuntz, sponsored by TCYS, began working as an aide on December 4. He will be funded for 160 hours. Nineteen volunteers gave a total of 195.5 hours; daily average 8 hours. Five community service assignees worked 29 hours; daily average 1.2 hours. Library Board gave 7 hours. Youth Services: Our holiday theme was "Christmas is Together Time" featuring exhibits, programs and activities geared towards family participation. "Read Together" encouraged families to jointly read ten books to complete a reading certificate and submit it to the library with a non-perishable food donation. Participants received two free tickets to the Joy Theater. The theater donated thirty tickets and the Kiwanis Club provided 'i the food collection barrel. Fourteen tickets were given out. "Get Together" was our family night at the library. Readings were given by the Children's Librarian and a junior volunteer (Mick Corliss). Twenty-nine people attended. Forty-one children attended six storytimes. Overall juvenile fiction circulation was down 28% from November to December (2,365 to 1,696) compared with a 24% drop in 1984 and a 28% drop in 1983 during the same months. It appears to be a seasonal flux. Work Indicators: December 1985 December 1984 Adult Materials 5216 4806 Juvenile Materials 2235 1761 TOTAL 7451 6567 Days of Service 20 20 Average Daily Circulation 373 330 Increase/Decrease Circ +13% -10% (4 Reference/Readers' Advisory 264 196 Story Time 83 (6) 9 Special Children's Program 29 (2) 73 Materials Added/Withdrawn 495/161 300/0 { Borrowers: New/Renewal 108/56=164 98/79=177 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM is /Q, DATE SUBMITTED: January 21, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEJAGENDA TITLE: Notice of Decision MLP 19-Q5 -Aldo Rossi, SDR 19-85 Margaret PREPARED BY: Community Development Custer Ford. M 16-85 Seimens-Allis, Inc. REQUESTED BY: 7,4 DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: seam ssrsasaaaaasaasaasaaaa as xa x.x a=aaaaaa asaxa asses aaaaasxaaaaaaasaaaaaxaaxa axaaa POLICY ISSUE aasaamssssssss saczsasaaaaaaaaa z sea xaaaazease�aaaaaaamaaasamaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasa INFORMATION SUMMARY �. Attached are the Notice of Decisions for: MLP 1.9-85, by Aldo Rossi to divide a 1.13 acre parcel into three parcels, located on the west side of SW Pacific Hwy, approximately 200 fee north of McDonald Stceet. SDR 19-85, by Margaret Custer Ford to expand an existing 1,140 square foot office building with an addition of approximately 6,488 square fee on property zoned C-P, located at 7160 SW Fir Loop. M 16-85, by Seimens-Allis, Inc. to adjust two parcels of 134,364 and 419,441 square feet into two parcels on property zoned I-L, located at 13885 SW 72nd Avenue. a7Rasmalma,maasasaasssammaaaaaa:aaaaasaasaasaaaamacssamaaasmssasaaaaasaassssassa.sa ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. szmamsasasamaa:aaaasaaasmaaaaaaa:aaaasaaaaamaasasazasaaaaaaaaasaaaasaaasaaaasaaaa SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. � a CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 19-85 APPLICATION: Request by Aldo Rossi to divide a 1.13 acre parcel into three parcels of 30,863, 12,295, and 13,471 square feet on property zoned C-G (Commercial General) and located on the west side of SW Pacific Highway approximately 200 feet north of McDonald Street (WCTM 2S1 3DD, T.L. 1000). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous Land Use proposals have been reviewed by the City. 2. Vicinity Information The properties to the north, south and the east side of Pacific Highway are zoned C--G and developed with retail and office uses. The parcels to the west are zoned R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) and are developed with single family residences. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description The subject property is utilized as a used ,car lot with a mobile office located near the center, One driveway entrance is situated near the northeast corner of the parcel. The applicant proposes to divide the property into two parcels with frontage on Pacific Highway and a third parcel adjacent to the residentially zoned properties. Proposals will be forthcoming regarding development of the resulting parcels. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. All necessary street improvements are in place along the Pacific Highway frontage, but a street opening permit will be necessary before any work may commence within the street right-of--way. b. The three proposed parcels must each be served by sanitary and storm sewer facilities. Public easements will be necessary to allow service to each of the three lots. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 19-85 - PAGE 1 The State Highway Division recommends that access for the three parcels be restricted to one location. The location of the proposed 40 foot wide easement is appropriate. No other comments have been received. 8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed partition is consistent with the applicable requirements of Chapter 18.62 (C-G zone) and Chapter 18.162 (Land Division). The applicant should be aware that access to Pacific Highway or future development may be limited to the location which coincides with the proposed easement. Development of the three parcels will require City approval through the Site Development Review or Conditional Use process. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves MLP 19-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PARTITION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 2. Public sanitary and storm sewer easements shall be provided to the City by the applicant on City forms and the installation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities which conform with City code, shall be assured prior to recording the partition. 3. Seven (7) sets of plan—profile sanitary and storm sewerage public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to he Engineering Section for review approval. 4. Construction of public sewerage improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond and the payment of a permit fee. Also, the execution of a construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approve public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEES SCHEDULES, BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. 5. Joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. Said agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED. 6. The partition survey and legal descriptions shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. THE CITY SHALL RECORD THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AFTER APPROVAL UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE WITH THE DIRECTOR. Y, ,t NOTICE OF DECISION — MLP 19--85 — PAGE 2 ' - r 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notic : Notice was published in the newspaper, Posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant 6 owners XIX Owners of record within the required distance rhood Planning organization XX The affected Neighbo XX Affected governmental agencies 2, Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL 6E FINAL ON January 27, 198b UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: arty to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance Any p and Section 18.32.370 of the Community with Section 18.32.290(A) eal must be Development Code which provides that a written app filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. 1-27-86 you have any questions, please call the City of 4, 1(�uestions: If y rd City Hall, 12755 SW Tigard Planning Department, TigaTigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. Ash, p0 Box 23397, g DATE Senior P ner PREPARED 8Y Keith S. Liden, ` `?, William an, ire for of Planning 6 Development GA AP OVED (KSL:bs66) 4 MLP 19-85 PAGE 3 NOTICE OF DECISION - - CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 19-85 APPLICATION: Request by Margaret Custer Ford to -expand an existing 1,140 square foot office building with an addition of approximately 6,488 square feet on property zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) and located at 7160 SW Fir Loop (WCTM 2S1 IDA, T.L. 1400). DECISION. Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1, Background In 1978, the City granted Site Design Review (SDR 27--78) approval to construct two office buildings on the property. The first building and a portion of the parking area (Phase I) has been completed, but the rear section of the parcel remains undeveloped. 2 . VicinityInformation The properties to the north, west, southwest, and east are zoned .. C-P and developed with commercial office buildings. The property immediately south is zoned T-P (Industrial Park) and is partially developed with a light industrial use. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description A 1,140 square foot office building occupies the northern portion of the property. A ten foot wide driveway provides access to a small parking lot. A significant number of fir and deciduous trees occupy the property. The applicant proposes to construct a two story , 6,488 square foot addition on the south side of the existing building. The existing parking lot will be expanded to include a two-way drive, additional spaces, and a one-way exit onto a driveway on the property immediately to the east. 4. Agency and NPO-Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. The nearest catch basin for stormwater runoff is located approximately 250 feet west on Fir Loop. Storm drainage facilities must be designed to mitigate runoff problems which would affect adjacent properties or the roadway gutter system. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 19-85 - PAGE 1 b. A street opening permit will be necessary for any construction (eg. driveway aprons) which occur within the public right—of—way. C. A joint use and maintenance agreement will be necessary for at least the portion of the driveway that will be shared with the property to the east. The Building Inspection Division notes that all Building Code requirements must be met. The Tigard Water District indicates that fire protection capacity is adequate unless a sprinkler system is required. Because the water use on the property will increase the owner should check with the District to determine the need for a larger meter or an additional one. NPO ##5 has no objection to the request. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed development is consistent with relevant portions of the Community Development Code pertaining to building height and setbacks, lot coverage, access, and parking (22 spaces required, 28 provided). Several issues related to landscaping, parking, and access warrant further discussion. E Landscaping A landscaping plan was not submitted for review but one must be approved prior to the issuance of any building permits or tree cutting. Section 18.100.130 of the Code states that a ten foot wide landscaped buffer containing a combination trees, shrubbery and ground cover must be provided along the boundary of the property abuts the I—P zone to the south. The Code also allows the Planning Director to approve alternative pians which provide the same degree of desired buffering. The site plan indicates that this buffer area will vary between five and fourteen feet in width. The required landscaping plan should address the reduced width of the buffer strip and show how the proposed plan will be consistent with the intent of the Code. Finally the Code discourages unnecessary tree removal. The site plan illustrates the need for removing the trees as shown, except for the 31 inch Douglas fir located between the south side of this proposed addition and the rear driveway. It appears that only minor adjustments would have to be made to the site plan to keep the tree. This issue should be reviewed in conjunction with the landscaping plan. i NOTICE OF DECISION'— SDR 19-85 — PAGE 2 G Parking As noted earlier, the proposed project will provide more than the required number of spaces. However, the Code also calls for the installation of bicycle parking spaces at a ratio of one for every 15 required vehicular spaces. Therefore, at least one bicycle space'is necessary. Its design and location should be submitted for review and approval. Access The proposed driveways meet the access standards for the City. The one--way driveway should be clearly marked as such to minimize the number of motorists traveling in the wrong direction. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SDR 19-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. The building construction plan shall illustrate site grade (both existing and proposed) and shall clearly illustrate site stormwater runoff direction and runoff controls. Mitigation of runoff onto adjacent parcels, including the public roadway, shall be provided for, and assured to the City in writing by the applicants architect prior to City issuance of an approved building plan, 3, A city Street Opening Per-nit shall be obtained by the applicant in the event excavation work over 12" deep is proposed to be preformed within the public right-of-way of SW Fir Loop (i.e. within eight feet of the existing curb). 4. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall,be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. Sanitary sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. 5. Construction of proposed public improvement shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond and the payment of a permit fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING, AND AGREEMENTS, NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 19-85 - PAGE 3 ' agreements shall be executed Said nd Joint use and maintenance g for all common driveways. 6• standard forms of all recorded on City be referenced on and become proved by the agreements shall agreement shall be app applicable parcel Deeds. Said E AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS engineering Section. JOINT USE ARE ENCLOSED. Director l be submitted for 7, A landscaping plan shalPlanning approval which includes the following: a. Compensation for the partial reduction in the width of the southern buffer strip. ustification for its b. Retaining the 31 inch Douglas fir or j removal. Contact Keith Liden regarding this condition. S The one-way driveway shall be clearly marked. g. This approval is va:.id if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE er, posted at City Notice was published in the newspaper, 1 Notice' : Hall and mailed to XX — The applicant b owners required distance Owners of record within the req �9 0 anization �— The affected Neighborhood PlXX anning XX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: FINAL ON Januar THE DECISION SHALL BE 27 1986 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. ' appeal this decision in accordance to the decision _maY Any party and Section 1$•32.370 of teal Community mbe with Section 18.32.290(A)rovides that a wwrittenaPP t iven Development Code which P after notice is 9 filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days and sent. 1-27-86 The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. please call the City of If you have any questions, and City Hall, 12755 SW uestions Department Tig 4' Tigard Planning 39-11 Z- Tigard, sh. PO Box 23397, Oregon 97223, DATE Senio Planner 7 PRE Y: Keith Li DATE APPROVED --------Development William A. Mona an, Director of plana (KSL:bs65) NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 19-85 - PAGE 4 _ III P 'w \t � Dom 4 r' CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 16-85 APPLICATION: A request by Seimens-Allis Inc. to adjust two parcels of 134,364 and 419,441 square feet into two parcels of 243,082 and 310,723 square feet on property zoned I-L (Light Industrial) and I-H (Heavy Industrial) and located at 13885 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC Tax Lots 1100 and 4000). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director- based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT I. Background An application for a Minor Land Partition (MLP 3--83) was approved in May, 1983. The applicant (same) proposed to partition 532,783 square feet into two parcels of 190,955 square feet and 341,828 square feet. 2. Vicinity Information Properties to north of the site are zoned I--P (Industrial Park). The zoning on tax lot 1100 (eastern portion of subject property), to the south and east is I-H (Heavy Industrial). Tax lot 4000 (remainder of property) is zoned I-L and properties to the west are zoned I-L (Light Industrial). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a large industrial structure on tax lot 1100. Tax lot 4000 is presently undeveloped. The applicant proposes to move the boundary between tax lots 1100 and 4000 east to with 20 feet of the existing building. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Services Division had the following comments: 1. The Applicant shall provide a storm sewer drainage way easement to the public across the most westerly portion of parcel No. 2 (tax lot 4000). (See Conditions) 2. The lot line adjustment shall be recorded at Washington County. The Building Division had the following comments: 1. An on-site inspection may be required because construction has taken place without a permit due to prior location in County. NOTICE OF DECISION -SEIMENS-ALLIS INC. - M 16-85 - PAGE 1 2. Approval :,f the new lot line may violate Building Fire Code requirements due to a change in property line setbacks. We have received no further comments. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions of Section 18.162 of the Tigard Community Development Code. At present, the two parcels, tax lots 4000 and 1100, are divided by a zoning map demarcation, i.e. they are zoned I-L and I-H respectively. An adjustment of this lot line which is coterminous with the zoning map demarcation between the I-L and I-H zones would create a larger lot 4000 which spans both the I-L and I-H zoning districts. Therefore, the applicant should be made aware of the uses permitted outright in each separate zone and what uses are permitted outright in both zones (see attached). A zoning change for either lot is also a possibility should the applicant wish to use tax lot 4000 for a heavy industrial use. Inquiries can be made through the Planning Department and an application must be filed with our office by mid-February in order for it to be placed on the Planning Commission's agenda in April. C. DECISION M 16-85 meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.162 of the Tigard Community Development Code subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 2. The final legal descriptions and survey map shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to recording. The necessary documents shall be recorded by the City unless other arrangements are approved by the director. 3. Three (3) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 4. Sanitary sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. 5. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond and the payment of a permit fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. NOTICE OF DECISION -SEIMENS-ALLIS INC. - M 16-85 - PAGE 2 6. Applicant shall provide a storm sewer drainage way easement to the public across the most westerly portion of parcel No. 2 (Tax Lot 4000); from the 24" conduit outfall at the west end of Tech Center Drive, through said parcel, to the railroad right-of-way. Said easement shall be on approved forms. 7. Should applicants' development plans (for lot 4000) require installation of a closed drainage system there, then such shall be installed at owner's expense. 8. The existing boundary between the I-L and I-H zoning districts shall not be affected by this action. 9. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. 0. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XXX The applicant & owners XXXOwners of record within the required distance XXX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XXX Affected governmental agencies T_. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of'an appeal is 4:30 P.M. off' 3`F3 Es 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. P EPA` Y: Deborah A. tuart, Ayrptant Planner DATE .0IIV OF William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE APPROVED (DAS:bs/71) NOTICE OF DECISION -SEIMENS-ALLIS INC. - M 16-85 - PAGE 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: 65 13 DATE SUBMITTED: January 28, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Res. 82-103 placed ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution _ the subdv. on its maintenance period accepting Gentle Woods Subdivision PREPARED BY: John Hagman —�"'� REQUESTED BY: Comm. Dew. Enqr. Services DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLIGY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Gentle Woods subdivision is located on the east side of SW 79th Avenue ( approximately halfway between Bonita Road and Durham Road. 2. All public improvement work therein is now satisfactorily completed. 3. Subsequently, staff recommends that the City Council take final acceptance action,thereinregard,and, also, authorize release of the maintenance bond. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Pass the resolution titled: "Resolution of the Tigard City Council Accepting the Public Improvements Constructed within Gentle Woods Subdivision and Authorizing Release of the Maintenance Bond." (JH:pm37) h CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Feb 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0: AGENDA OF: y 28, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Res 80-77 placed DATE SUBMITTED: Januar on its maintenance eriod ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution the subdv. acce tin Picks Landi 2 Subdiv. PREPARED BY: John Naaman REQUESTED BY. Comm Dev En9r. Services CITY ADMINISTRATOR, DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: _----- - POLICY ISSUE�� ff -� INFORMATION SUMMARY 1, Picks Landing 2 Subdivision is located south of Durham Road near the intersection of 98th Avenue and Durham Rd, 2. All public improvement work therein is now satisfactorily completed. $ Subsequently, staff recommends that the City Council take final acceptance action ,thereirregard,and, also, authorize release of the maintenance bond. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION uncil ing Pass the resolution titled: "Resolution within theTigard L ndingy 2 oSubdivision Land the Public Improvements Constructed Authorizing Release of the Maintenance Bond." (JH:pm37) CITY OF TIGARQ, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY / AGENDA OF: February 10th 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: ,1 ) '_5� DATE SUBMITTED: January 29 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Accepted Compliance ISSs1E/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution Agreement & Bond on January 7. 1985 acce ti "SW 114th Court" with PREPARED BY: John Haaman conditions _ REQUESTED BY: Comm. Dev. (Ener. Serv.) DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLIt_ 1Y ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. SW 114th Court is located in Summerfield Subdivision, north of SW and developed as ` Sublacf roadway to er4rewaynew multi-family t of Sw 109th Acomplex alledit s"The Fo ntains" p ield Drive a 2, Construction has proceeded satisfactorily. The developer, Tualatin as indicated their desire for Council to place the Development Company, h work on its one year guarantee period a rid performance bond on file. to g same.4SeStaff leave to has existing prepared and recommends passage of the attached resolution. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED '! SUGGESTED ACTION ic Pass the resolution_titled: SWR 114th 1�nourtntatively located accepting the Northof street improvements known a Summerfield Drive and West of 109th Avenue, subject to specified conditions. J'H:bs84 r4 J CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON_ • COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: ��• — DATE SUBMITTED: January 28, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Sewer Easements A-Mart Summerlake No. 2 PREPARED BY: John Hagman K../ REQUESTED BY: Comm. Dev. Enqr. Services DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: l ��/ G 1'! CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION_SUMMARY 1. The easements will provide access for public operation and maintenance of one sanitary sewer line and one storm sewer line ; both being located within AMART SUMMERLAKE No. 2 SUBDIVISION, as illustrated by the attached maps. 2. The easements were required by staff to be provided to the City for the aforesaid reason and, subsequently, it is recommended that Council act to accept them. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Accept sanitary and storm sewer easements to facilitate public operation and maintenance of certain sewer lines within A-MART Summerlake No. 2 Subdivision. l (JH:pm37) INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PAIL IIP PERMANENT STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT n,pyl A7L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT Thomas Kucera and Jill Kucera; Robert Lair Welch, Jr. and Charlene V. Welch, Clyde c. Saylor III and Rebecca J. Saylor herein after called the Grantors, in consideration for =ant u convey untollars the City ofOTigard from aheperpeetual Tigard, hereinafter called Grantee, g rating, maintaining, inspecting and easement for constructing, reconstructing, operating, i repairing of an underground storm drainage line and appurtenances, together with the right to remove, as necessary, vegetation, foliage, trees and other obstructions on the following described parcel of land, situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon: (Described in Exhibit "A") IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors that such use shall not from the full use and dominion provided, however,e of the intent of the easement interfere with the uses and purpose IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above successors eand forfeited f ei d �the case of such esimmediately revert to the Grantors, the To HAVE AND Z0 1YJLp the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its ! successors and assigns forever. \ IN WITNESS WHLTdDOF, the grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals this _I"' day of N04F-M fi2- , 19BS r� (Seal) -(Seal) (Seal) (Seal) Z (Seal) l �� STATS OF OREGON 1 ss. County of Washington ) T" day of oV� 1995 before me, the BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this _�_ PPe a and the within- undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, personally named Thomas Kucera and Jill Kucera; Robert Lair Welch, Jr. and Charlene V. Welch; Clyde o me to be the identical inivuals C^Saylor IIn and Rebecca J. Saylor who are known t and who executed the within i strument and acknowledged to metha id d<,scr executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREO1, QIP have hereunto set my hand and seal this 'lTM day of --�s�L�l11tL� C Notary Public Oregon (NMMAL SEAL) My Commission Expires: 19 (� �& Tigard Approved as to form this day of By: y A.ttrne 0 � Approved as to legal description this 3ay of d 19 By:C1 y Tigard rt►?+�p Approved this CQ�*Y of '=b r-ss�.r - ITY 19�yREOON CITY CUUNC(-`Yl+, Cl'rY GF TIGARD, C BY ity Recorder - City of Tigard C p O DAVID EVF1f1S Ana �1SSOCiF1TES . enc. 2626 3W CORBETT flVEnL)E • PORTLAnD.OREGOn 97201 • 503/223.6663 ART020 10-28-85 D.W.B. EXHIBIT "A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,FOR STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT A1ART SUMMER LAKE 2 (PHASE 4) A portion of the East one-half of Section 33, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, said portion being described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 19 AMART SUMMER LAKE, a duly recorded subdivision recorded on Plat Book 52, page 34, Washington County Plat Records, within the East one- half of Section 33, Township l South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, -Washington County, Oregon; thence along the east boundary of said Lot 19, North 20016'09" East , 12.89 feet; thence South 76024'31" East, 146.11 feet to the TRUE POINT OF f BEGINNING; thence North 34055'19" East, 97.81 feet; thence North 33005'11" East, 85.24 feet; thence North 29056'25" East, i 82.81 feet; thence South 60003'34" East, 15.00 feet; thence # South 29056'25" West, 83.22 feet; thence South 33005' 11" West,85.89 feet; thence South 34055' 19" West, 93.17 feet; thence North 69039'47" West 7.75 feet; thence North 76024' 31" West, 8.05 feet; to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 3956 square feet, more or less. Deane W. Blair, P.L.S. 1981 ''-: �P'NI'fP��Y S�W�iy �•P��M�6�i'f a� N t'o0'03'3h"W 10.00' ,..:' N�i3'05'i i'5 •+. ': �. a� N0*0�v�'35'1 ' •� N� 329.8L.' T. ek �� I I NZO'►ti'ai01"E NV9'39'4?'W � I P.QG: iZ:99' 1.75' "� • I I 2 A� Z9•iO'i1� rz t�Pp 10 AGGOMPPNY dE7-fov-m �Nn ` '.J - aNQ fMMMItl10d71'i�R Oil�•� ��1 r��lr w.M�«.�M� P iNDIVIDUAL--GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT IMW ATS• MEN By THESE PRESENTS THAT Thomas Kucera and Jill Kucera; Robert Lair Welch, Jr. and Charlene V. Welch, Clyde c. Saylor I II and Rebecca J. Saylor herein after called the Grantors, in consideration for the sum of NO dollars ($ 0.00) from the City of Tigard, hereinafter called Grantee, grant and convey unto the City of Tigard, a perpetual easement for constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting and repairing of an underground sanitary sewer line arra appurtenances, together with the .right to remove, as necessary, vegetation, foliage, trees and other obstructions on the following described parcel of land, situated in the City of Tigard, Washington.County, State of Oregon: (Described in Exhibit "A") IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not Interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of such event. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. # IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of 19-1:?_. (Seal) 1Seai) Al (Seal) (Seal)7 (Sealy- ISTAOFRDOGOMN ! ss. County of Washington i BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 'I day of NO19%,b before me, the undersigned Notary Public in aid for the State of Oregon, personally appeared the within- named Thomas Kucera and Jill Kucera; Robert lair Welch, Jr. and Charlene V. Welch; Clyde C. Saylor III and Rebecca J. Saylor who are known to me to be the identical individuals described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY VHEREOF, iI have hereunto set my hand and seal this '1� day of UAJF:/APWYt_ , 19 t 0. (NOIORIAL SEAL) Notary Pu6I'ic r Oregon My Commission Expires: 321-55� Approved as to form this 1-I'day of Ee 19 . ar y Attar of T �•Cl - ity ' Approved as to legal description this y of 1 By: _ Ci C Tigard Approved this f 0!!day of j=,�/o r care. CITY COU. 1L, CITY OF TIGARD, OREOCN BY eel i Recorder - City of Tigard p (�C==::)no DAVID EVA ns Rnp A330CIATE3, inc. 2626 3W CORBETT AVEnUE • PORTIAnD,ORE&0n 97201 • 5031223.6663 ART020 10-28-85 D.W.B. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SANITARY SEWER EASMENT AMART SUMMER LAKE 2 (PHASE 4) A portion of the east one-half of Section 33, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, said portion being a strip of land 32.00 feet wide , being 16.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the centerline of S.W. Summer Lake Drive, said point of beginning being South 59015'08" ..EAST 25.00 feet from the most easterly corner of Lot 33„ Anaart Summer Lake; thence along the arc of a 322.16 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 27010'1711 an arc distance of 152.78 feet (the chord bears North 1700914311 East, 151.35 feet to a point of tangency; thence North 3034135" East, 329.86 feet to a point of non-tangent curvature; thence along the arc of a 325.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 25045125" an arc distance of 146.10 feet (the chord bears North 72056117" West, 144.87 feet) to a point of tangency thence North 60003135" West, 70.00 feet to the point of termination. Containing 22 , 360 square feet, more or less. eane W. Blair, P.L.S. 1981 ':' hPN1'fP9zY ��Vtf�iy �P��M�N'f x N too°03'35"W ?0.00' •t `'G°O'O's'34'>; �ti• 1�00' • of fir+ N j. . .. I N ZO'ifi'O'i's; Ntr'I.39'A•7'IN s d24.06 y p3 Z7°10'iY• t?lt.lE3 25.00 M*O-r 10 pGGOMPP-NY 4E 'fOF-M PNP t t MILL LIP- � �. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY E /n AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: L), q DATE SUBMITTED: January 28, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: r ISSUE/AGENUA TITLE: Drainage Easement - Davidson Site PREPARED BY: John Hagman Walnut Placed REQUESTED BY: Comm. Dew. Engr. Services DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: — POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The easement will provide access for- public operation and maintenance of one storm sewer line; said line being located on a private tract adjacent to SW Walnut Place, as illustrated by the attached map. 2. The easement was required by staff to be provided to the City for the aforesaid reason and, subsequently, it is recommended that Council act to accept it. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Accept the Davidson storm sewer easement to facilitate public operation and maintenance of the line installed therein. r. (JH:pm3 7) INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PERMANENT STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT f hereinafter called the Grantors, in consideration or the um of dollars ($ ^� from the City Of Tigard, hereinafter called Grantee, grant an,: convey' unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement for constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting and repairing of an Aaderground 9taormdrainage line and appurtenances, together with the right to remove, snecessary, ve 8 foliage, trees and other obstructions on the following described parcel of land, situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon; } SEE EXHIBIT "A" right, j IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any [ title or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. I IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or esr:gne should cause said easement to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revtrt to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE AND TD HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(&) has (have) hereunto set his (her) (the aad(s) ad al( ) this 20th day of Qecei r 14 . ti j� (SEAL) (SEAL) William G. Davidson (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Washington ) EE IT KLVJ BERED, that on this ,day of before ss. the undersigned Notary—Public in and foc ina tate of Oregon, }t personally appeared the within-named Jilliam G. Davidson who is ars own to as to e the ideatiea individual(; described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to at that he (she) (they) executed the some freely and voluntarily. IN TEr,,.VONY WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand and seal this 20th day ic of Decem er 19 65 y ie for Oregon (NOTA.RIAL SEAL) My Cosgdaeion Expires; Approved as to form this J l +,. day of f,. (: . 19.1!_2._' BysGui.i. ty Attor ey - ty o Tigas �Oday _. Approved as to legal description this 2.3— ^o�f Bys CltyeftftOr VC o Tigard Sunt 7l'` • Approved this 1 nday of • 1"�za CI IL, CITYO!F TZGARD, OREGON ity Recorder - City of Tigard r is/cu/o:: EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION DAVIDSON STORM SEWER EASEMENT A strip of land being 7.50 feet on each side, when measured at right angles, of the following described center line within the following designated premises: Beginning at a point on the northeasterly line of Lot "r at Frewing Tracts, being a subdivision of Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 1 Frewing Orchard Tracts, Washington County, Oregon, S-43°50'00"-E 88.60 feet from the most northerly corner of said Lot "F"; thence N-75°06'25"-W 91.60 feet; thence: parallel with the northwesterly line of said Lot "F" S-45'12'00"-W 107.00 feet; thence S-71°04'30"-W 75.00 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of S. W. Walnut Place as set forth in the plat of Frewing Tracts, and the terminus of this ease- ment, said terminus being N-43°50'00"-W 23.67 feet from the intersection of said right-of-way line and the northwesterly line of said Lot "F". The side lines of this easement shall extend or shorten as necessary to intersect the center line boundaries. 1 /,2.00~uJ 7•Aa �q i mosr vofrg v mss.• �� ,1 �� Mme for �- - �.s'' � a �s Sa i t� iaARMs -MCMO AGIM,AAMOCCIA'13M =MCC" CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: I C), [ DATE SUBMITTED: February 4, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council adopted ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Historic Ordinance 86-02 on 1/13/86 District Overlay Fee PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Newton _ REQUESTED BY: Planning Staff DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: j�j _� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should the Historic District Overlay fee be reduced to reflect the reduced costs to be incurred by the City as a result of Ordinance 86-02. INFORMATION SUMMARY On January 13, 1986 the City Council adopted Ordinance 86--02 which modified the requirements for the Historic District Overlay. The elimination of the Public bearing requirement will substantially lessen the cost of these applications. Staff feels that the current foe of $400.00 is too high and that a fee of $75.00 would conform to the Council's policy of setting fees at 80% of the cost of processing the application. Attached is a resolution which, if approved, would reduce the Historic District Overlay fee to $75.00. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Reduce the Historic Overlay District fee from $400.00 to $75.00. 2. Retain the current $4013.00 fee for Historic Overlay Districts. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution which reduces the application fee for Historic District Overlays from $400.00 to '$75.00. EAN:bs94 Y CITY OF TIGARO, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: ° DATE SUBMITTED: February10, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: r ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: WCCLS Contract For Service (1985-87) PREPARED BY: REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT 14EAD OK: s^Q.Q _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The agreement for Library Services with Washington County has been reviewed and it is appropriate for the City of Tigard to sign. This agreement covers the life of the present levy (i.e. 7-1--85 through 6-30-87). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to authorize the City Administrator to sign the agreement with Washington County on behalf of the City of Tigard. lw/3585A v v%, %)i ire i uv1.11 ll y L_ILJIU1 Y OtA VIUUS Howl IL s 0 0 likk UMM111 MEE ONE Sol son MEE now WN r January 30, 1986 MEMO: TO: Public Library Directors FROM: Donna Selle RE: Nonfee Access Agreement In discussion with County Counsel consensus was reached to merely extend the life of the agreement to June 30, 1987 and add 1986/87 proposed reim- bursement attachments. Please have all three copies signed and returned to this office. Donna seue.coorcinator Mailing Address:P.O.Box 5129 Aloha,Oregon 97006 Location: 17880 SW Blanton Street Aloha,Oregon Telephone:(503)642-1544 AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES This Agreement is entered into by and between the cities of Beaverton, Cornelius, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Sherwood, Tigard and Tualatin, Banks School Dist. #13, Cedar Mill Community Library Association and Town Center Public X Library, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Contractors, and Washington County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as County, on behalf of Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS). WHEREAS, the voters of Washington County have approved a tax which will allow $2.5 million annually for fiscal 1985/86 and 1986/87 funds for the provision of countywide library services including non-fee access by County residents to contracting libraries; and WHEREAS, the County, cities, and community library boards are authorized ( to enter into agreements for the provisions of these services pursuant to ORS 357.410 and ORS Chapter 190, and the Contractors are capable of providing such library services, and the County is desirous of contracting with Contractors to provide the same; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. CONSIDERATION As compensation to Contractors for the services to be provided pursuant to this agreement, County agrees to pay Contractors payments according to funding formula for services rendered pursuant to this agreement, subject to Section D on termination. For those Contractors that are municipal corporations, on or before December 31st the County shall pay Contractors { 2 two-thirds of their contractual payment. The final one-third of the total payment owing Contractors shall be made on or before April 15th. Payments shall be made monthly if Contractors are private, non-profit libraries. Funding formula used to compute individual library payments: After annual costs for Countywide Services (average cost $333,000), Automation (average cost $333,000), County Administrative Cost Allocations and Elections (average costs $69,000) and Contingency (average cost $200,000) are reserved from the total WCCLS appropriation, the remainder is divided into two funds; 1) a city fund equal to 46.112 of the remainder and 2) an unincorporated fund equal to 53.89% of the remainder. These percentages are based on 1985 assessed valuations as used in ORS 308.205. 1985 assessed valuation in the contractor cities including Wilsonville is $4,307,225,721; assessed valuation in the rest of the County is $5,033,970,812 From the Citv Fund: 1) Community libraries are reimbursed for service to county residents who live in contractor cities at the rate of $1.50 per circulation. Total annual circulation will be based on the 12 month period April 1 through March 30 immediately preceeding the contract period. Circulation percentages will be surveyed by each library on two, two-week periods in the 12 months immediately preceeding the contract year. 2) A contractor city-to-contractor city reimbursement is made for service at the rate of $1.50 per circulation. 3) The remainder is prorated among contractor cities and the City of Wilsonville based on assessed valuation. From the Unincorporated Fund: 1) Contract--;r city 14 braries are reimbursed for service to crn:nty re ids *.s living outside contractor cities at the rate of $1.50 per circulation. 2) Community libraries are reimbursed for service to county residents living outside contractor cities at the rate of $1.50 per circulation. WCCLS REIMBURSEMENT PROCESS "The 'City Service to Unincorporated Users' reimbursement must not constitute a greater percentage of a city library's total budget than the 'Unincorporated Washington County Circulation' constitutes of a library's total circulation." 3 . The following is the general calendar outline of events. July 1 - Public libraries turn in previous year expenditures as final figures are available and/or audit completed - City libraries turn in present fiscal year's budgets to check for minimum levels of city support - Monthly payments to Community Libraries begin October - Countywide circulation survey Assessed Valuation figures available Reimbursement figures compiled December - 1st check for 2/3rds of WCCLS payment is made with adjustments in city reimbursements from previous fiscal year, if necessary January - WCCLS Budget preparation April - 2nd, final payment to cities May - Second countywide circulation survey June - WCCLS Budget adoption Notes: Interest earnings on the special library fund accrue to the special library fund. (ORS 294.080 (1). Any remaining funds from the $2.5 million annual appropriation will be carried over and be considered in the next year's library appropriation to maintain the circulation reimbursement formula. A CJi.\" Ui _ it i1istribiit:`iiii worksheet 1S :jt i.ilC �'u :1 i\ :ib1t :t. B. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COUNTY County agrees to provide the following services for each Contractor: 1. Daily courier service excluding weekends and holidays 2. Reference services at Pacific University Library including Interlibrary Loan 3. Shared audio visual equipment 4. Outreach services to the elderly, handicapped and institutionalized 5. Books By Mail to all rural route boxholders and any Washington County resident by request t . . 4 6. Children's Summer Reading Program 7. Planning for long term growth and development of Countywide library services 8. Coordination and administration of above and with the Tri-County Region, State and Northwest 9. County shall provide Contractors with a copy of its annual audit 10. Develop and implement an integrated library automation system for libraries in Washington County towards a separate, self- supporting program for continuation of the system by WCCLS or its successor agency. C. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTORS Contractors agree to provide, at a minimum, the following services: 1. Non-Fee Access Contractors shall provide Washington County residents free (non-fee) access to their normally circulating library materials under established circulator. =-rill not be construed to prohibit overdue fees or other special service fees as long as those fees are uniformly applied to all borrowers. 2. Library Services Contractor, her-by au.-e+.: to expend all County funds received pursuant to this agreement in providing library services according to Contractors' established policies. The provision of library services shall mean that the Contractors' library facility shall be open for public use by Washington County residents. 3. Staff Contractors shall have one designated paid staff person who shall have the responsibility for administration of the library and its programs. 4. Record Keeping Contractors shall supply County with a copy of the 3, 5 ( annual report it makes to the Oregon State Library in accordance with ORS 357.520. Contractors shall also keep circulation records of use of its library by residents of individual cities, unincorporated areas of Washington County and other counties. Circulation percentages will be surveyed by Contractors for two, two-week periods in the 12 months immediately preceeding the contract year. 5. Financial Audit/Review Each contracting city shall furnish the County a copy of its annual audit. Each contracting community or non-profit library shall be responsible for obtaining an annual review of its financial statements by an independent certified public accountant. This review shall be performed in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. County shall be furnished a copy of the contracting community or non-profit library's financial statement review by December 31st of each year. 6. Equal Opportunity County Personnel Rules provide that County shall enter into contractual agreements only with Equal Opporti.inity Employers. Therefore, Contractors hereby agree that its employees (and applicants for employment) shall not be discriminated against because of race, color, national origin, religion, physical or mental handicap, sex or age, except in the case of bona fide occupational qualifications as defined and provided by Oregon law. 7. Compliance with Applicable Provisions of ORS Chapter 279 Community Library Contractors further agree that they shall comply fully with all applicable provisions of ORS 279.310 through 279.430. Said provisions are hereby incorporated by reference and the applicable terms contained therein shall be binding upon Community Library Contractors in the same manner as if they were fully set forth herein. 6 D. TERMINATION 1. The County shall have the right to terminate this agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice, if it determines, in good faith, that the public interest would be served by such termination or if during any successive fiscal year beyond the first year of this agreement the funds are not available. he right to terminate this agreement upon 2. The Contractors shall have t rmine, in good faith, that the (60) days written notice, if they dete public interest in their jurisdiction would be served by such termination or such termination is based upon appropriated funds for Contractor being less than the amount reasonably anticipated. Each of the individual Contractors shall have the right to terminate their ent without affecting the agreement between participation in this agreem remaining parties and the County. to any party in the event of the termination or parties shall be limited to the following: a. If County is the party initiating termination; County shall provide consi.dera�iot=: st i:: tris agreement prorated t � Contractors monetary to the date of termination as compensation for disruption of service. b. If any Contractor is the party initiating termination; Contractors consideration stated in this shall be entitled to the monetary of the fiscal year; provided, agreement through the remainder ision of stated library however, that Contractor continue the prov services and that Contactor shall be obligated to expend those funds Section C.1 and C.2 of according to the provisions of this agreement. N 71 7 f_. c. If Contractor is the party initiating termination; Contractor may elect to receive sixty (60) day entitlement and be relieved of all service obligations as compensation for disruption of service. E. HOLD HARMLESS Each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each of the other parties, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from and against all claims, demands, penalties, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense attorney's fees arising in favor of any person on account of personal injury, death or damage to property arising out of services performed, the omission of services or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the party so indemnifying and/or its agents, employees, sub-contractors or representatives. Indemnification agreed to herein is subject to and shall not exceed the limits of liability of the Oregon Tort Claims Act (ORS 30.260 through 30.300). F. CAPTIONS Captions and headings used in this agreement are for convenience only and shall not be construed or interpretvc so as to enlarge or diminish the rights or obligations of the parties hereto. H. TERM The term of this agreement shall be July 1, 1985 through and including June 30, 1987. I. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this K 75 INS e t .Y n^ 8 agreement is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement. The 1985-86 reimbursement schedule is: Banks $ 17,027 Beaverton 590,236 Cedar Mill 169,996 Cornelius 14,541 Forest Grove 116,506 Hillsboro 263,029 Sherwood 21,308 Tigard 194,559 Town Center 112,432 Tualatin 81,567 West Slope 71,796 Wilsonville 8,803 Countywide programs 326,996 Washington County Date Date DATE PREPARED: TAX RATE PER 1,000 A.Y.: LEVY AMOII"lT: 10/7/85 $0.27 $2,500,000 Q7RE inning balance 711/85 $560,558 Current property tax collections $2,2 +� Delinquent !ax collections $!00,000 Interest $10,000 Per capita state aid $14,704 Non-classified revenues (donations, etc.) $2+300 TOTAL PROPOSED R$VE?LE $2,937,362 'OFF THE THIP• EXPENDITURES County administrative charges $69,000 County wide library services 33,000 $3 Automation Sliope pass�thru* funds ,� Contingency Per capita state aid $1,281,565 REMAIN DER AVAILABLE FOR REIKMJRSQEM $1,655,797 % of f of assessed valuation ASSESSED VAUJATIDNS (in 1,000's) total among the 8 cities Total county AV $erton $9,x'197 100% 36 Cornelius 121,078 3 Forest &rove $309,215 7 She IIlerwobod $573;0026 22 Tigard $906,369 21 Tualatin $396,195 9 Wilsonville $53,333 1 Total of 8 cities $4,307,601 46.11 100 r -cinder of county $5,033,596 53.89 CITY •FUND' 46.11 % of remainder available $763,554 UNINCORPORATED •FLN• 53.89 % of available $892,243 City fund $763,5:54 Uninc. fund $892,243 Community library City library } services to city services to residents $39,5:2 unincorporated City base refund $724,033 residents $590,212 Balance $0 Community library refund at $1.50 per circ. 6338,547 Balance ($36,517) s S MiNINUM BUDGET REQUIREMENT IN CONTRACT City Service to Unincorporated residents reimbursement oust not {` ititute a greater percentage of a city Library's total budget 'c ..i the Unincorporated Washington County circulation constitutes of a library's total circulation. Appropriate adjustments will be made in WCCLS reimbursements to assure compliance with this provision. Budget projections, FY 1985-6 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Total City Lib. Total Minimum projected budget required if Percent Library City services funds % of library's circ. equaled % of total Unincorp. Budget Base to uninc. from budget represented by Uninc.res.use Library Res. use FY 85-6 Refund co. res. WCCLS reimbursement I (d)/(a) x 100 3 Beaverton 50.79 $1,033,2285 $257,144 $331,591 $01,074 $652.880 Cornelius 18.28 $51,390 $20,351 $3,975 $14,808 $21,744 Forest Grog 34.89 $256,526 $51,974 $65,074 $118,645 $186,513 Hillsboro 35.25 $491,258 $154,387 $105,448 $267,858 $299,121 Sherwood 43.80 $48,817 $12,274 $13,984 $21,699 $31,928 Tigard 34.41 $253.000 $152,345 $53,902 $198,131 $156,639 Tualatin 16.19 $2841544 $66,593 $16,238 $83,065 $100,320 FORMULA DEFICIT The current formula will always exhaust the city fund by distributing all moneys remaining in that fund among the participating cities according to their percentage of assessed valuation. In 1984, we experiencedincreases in unincorporated patron use, in both the city and community libraries. Couoled with an historic shift in AV from the unincorporated to incorporated areas, the result for our formula was an anticipated deficit in the unincorporated fund. .when this projected deficit was discovered, it was suggested that it be shared among the libraries. A number of factors have contributed to reduction of deficit from the anticipated 3158,4111 to ($36,517) 1. a larger levy 2. larger than anticipated cash balance in WCCLS funds on 7/I/85 $560,358 rather than $503,568 3 3. a small reversal of the historic shift in AV 1984: 46.557% in cities, 1985: 46.11% The current 'deficit' is distributed in the following manner. TOTAL FOR LIBRARY amount Library from this % of deficit new anticioated grid total share total 4/8/85 NET Banks $17,340 0.9 3313) $17.027 $16.047 $960 Beaverton $601.074 29.7 ($10.838) $590.236 $562.610 $27.626 Cedar Mill $173,118 8.5 ($3.121) $169.9:6 $162.626 $1,34u Cornelius $14,808 0.7 ($267) $14,541 $14,078 $463 Forest Grove $)18,645 5.9 ($2,139) $116,506 $108,861 $7,645 Hillsboro $267,858 13.2 ($4.830) $263.029 $246.363 $16,666 Sherwood $21,699 1.1 ($391) $21,308 $23.446 ($2.1.38) Tigard $198,131 9.8 ($3,572) $194,559 $186,618 $7,941 Town Center $114,497 5.7 ($2,064) $112.43.? $79.160 $33,272 Tualatin sd3,065 4.1 ($1,498) $81,567 $80,395 $1,172 West Slope $73,114 3.6 ($1,318) $71,796 $69,235 $2,561 Wilsonville $8,%4 0.4 ($162) $8,603 $8,036 $767 Countywide Programs $333,000 16.4 ($6,004) $326,996 TOTALS $2,025,314 100.0 ($36,517) M i.G M N N N N r� r va a d D A w ♦ 'v Yr� p 00 a�pa NN Nti ap .rT.N tT� Y7� � N1� Ril a N O O a .O-•i a .. YT ""ice NqNq Ypp YY��11 �M�Yypp Yr�pp�� O O ♦tT� �� amU MiQ Mm y`O� man ts�N �r'� 1pp rrpOp 1pp� ,.( �{ ,.j tV `w ALM �� M V»� M A3 N N ' "$SC �85t o8S a85t �$5i �XiS 1*82 '8`•+t 1*82 O a J p O a a O a 3 peJM V1�m NOM OO� ^YO� OON wtg ;;!2= OSN �/M N 1ryw N pip p {yp O p.-x ♦� r..�af �$N ,a...N O M Vy R1 f � O �Nr UN O ON ON O N� CSN lS N N � M pper�++ —82 OON M ObN X54 —,z"4 fV 4 O oS O N YF o ff': nl''c tuC'Xi n v`3N! {Z g _S2 �'.ti ram In^R �� r c; c; NN ON ON _ _ N M = N N N Y1 NSM ;M!! $ Nom' �$`J1 "$Si MOS -82 _22 v C a ON O Y.IM YVM O O OM a J W tea:► �o.p `.Y� �2�.4i r�� in� �8� �BY� Ntsrr -8.2 -a* N CCoopp Q1�n� yYY��OO ppo 11��pp oo pp Nttyy y� OJi Nresa•aa? �Y•]� Hfg,m„ wN�O X90 O$M �pN �f�l� O$N Q 4�, M N N N N Y � N yY _ y1 �' gg gJ na�..s $A o.�»Y .-.o�N Y'g�o.! �o.p»� �o.»W �o.y» op» Ys�o•" o.ye i■n o.W� �o.y� c> 'pU_N 1C■y Y� yY» .moi yW1 N i A U G O G YYyy�1 qC V� 4[a O ...Y LA a F� d¢ CI Jr+YL tr QOC>- �tnWQ DRAFT LEVY DISTRIBUTION FORMULA FOR Ff 1986-7 DATE PREPARED: TAX RATE PER 1,000 A.V. LEVY AMOUNT: 12/16i85 $0.21 $2.500.000 " 35-6 Circulation, assumes 1 times tnat of FY 1984-5 systemwide Circulation Survey: October, 1585 Octoter, 1985 REVENUE Beginning balance 7/1/86 6200,000 Current property tax collections $21250,000 Delinquent tax collections $100,000 Interest $2 000 7 Per capita state aid $14,700 Non-classified revenues (donations. etc.) $2,300 TOTAL PROPOSED REVEL $2,569,000 •OFF THE TOP• EXPENDITURES County administrative charges $69,000 County wide library services $3333,000 Automation $333,000 Best Slope pass-through funds $1,500 Contingency f 00,000 Per capita state aid $14,700 6951 200 REMAINDER AVAILABLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT $1,617,8W % of % of assessed valuation ASSESSED VALUATIONS (in 1,000's) fall. 1985 total among the 8 cities Total county AV $9,341,197 100% Beaverton $1,529,866 36 Cornelius $121.078 3 Forest Grove $309,215 7 Hillsboro $918,520 21 "herwood $733,025 2 igard s9t6,365 21 Tualatin $396,195 9 Wilsonville $53,333 1 Total of 8 cities $4,307,601 46.11 100 Remainder of county $5,033,596 53.89 CITY 9FUUND8 46.11 % of remainder available $746,033 UNINCORPORATED 'FUND' 53.89 % of available $871,767 E=City fund $746,033 Uninc. fund $871,767 unity library City library services to city services to residents $511826 unincoroarated Citv base refund $654.207 residents 55513,185 Balance ($0) Community library re�c.,rC at $1.50 per circ. $323.674 Balance tf 10,0521 MINIMUM &UDGET REOiJIRE(9ENT IN CONTRACT P*v Service to Unincorporated residents reimbursement oust rot ititute a greater percentage of a city library's total budget v nan the Unincoroorated Washington County circulation constitutes of a library's total circulation. aooropriate adjustments will be nape in WCCLS reimbursements to assure compliance with this provision. Budget projections, FY 1985-6 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Total City Lib. Total Minimum projected budget required if Percent Library City services funds % of library's circ. equaled % of total Unincorp. Budget Base to unirc. frog budget represented by Uninc.res.use Library Res. use FY 85-6 Refund co. res. WCCLS reimbursement I (d)/(a) x 100 1 Beaverton 48.82 %1,033,285 $246,551 $318,744 $587,104 $652,880 Cornelius 16.38 $51,390 $19,513 $3,562 $10.357 $21,744 Forest Grov 33.20 $256,526 $49,833 $61,925 $117,792 $186,513 Hillsboro 34.84 ,491,258 $148,027 $104,217 $258,560 $299,121 Sherwood 37.04 $48,817 $11,769 $119827 $17.453 $31.926 Tigard 29.58 %253,000 4146,069 $46,3326 $169.510 $1`6,639 Tualatin 11.55 $284,544 s63,&50 %11,583 $8.1,021 $100,320 FORMULA DEFICIT The current formula will always exhaust the city fund by distributing all moneys remaining in that fund among the participating cities according to their percentage of assessed valuation. In 1984, we experienced increases in unincoroorated patron use. in both the city and community libraries. Coupled with an historic shift in AV from the unincorporated to incorporated areas. the result for our formula was an anticipated deficit in the unincorporated fund. '•en this oro.jected deficit was discovered, it was suggested that it be shared among the libraries. The projected, formula-created 'deficit' for `9a budget calculated herr is ($10,092) The current 'deficit' is distributed in the following manner. TOTAL FOR LIBRARY Library_ from this % of deficit new grit total Banks $17,340 0.9 ($09) x17,251 Beaverton $587,104 29.9 (13,021) $584,083 Cedar Mill $173,367 8.8 (s892) $172.475 Cornelius $10,357 0.5 ($53) so,303 Forest Grove $117,792 6.0 (s600l sl 17,1na Hillsooro $258.°60 13.2 ($1,331) sc57 229 Sherwood $17.45.3is=)1 :) c3 Tigard $165,510 8.6 ($&724 slcc,aki Town Center $11-3.455 5.8 (s584) $112,871 Tualatin $833.021 4.2 (5427) W.593 West Slope $71,337 3.6 (s367) 570,970 Wilsonville $89555 0.4 ($44r $8,511 t Countywide Programs $333,000 17.0 ($1,714) $331.266 TOTALS $1.960,892 100.0 ($10,092) . . . . i - ■ | S 7 2!d ' ■ ; - ; a ` ; , ± Ail ® 9 | § § � � . . ,� � � . \ � � # ■ = e 2 j � | | � f 2 � ■ |„ '@| . � � re ■ ■ | .� $ � � � $ | • | J § . � | , � § ■ ! ! � ! ! § ! m ! ,| va ns 2 y Q 41 !R q$ q| q| q| q} | &7f | � -� �, -� -� -� -/ -- �• 3� =i �� . � . .� .� ■ -� -• ^e ®! q| 3� lit | �- .��.�... n • q| -! '� 2 � -!Mg &' w� A57 .� " a ,, ., .. 'as litSlE m2 °� 2 , of visa q, -. -, e| -7 '■ ; '- "■ '' S9.! gas Sig '32 —ale za` a' if , - ■ . - tea - - n ' '. ° '� °d' ,� � $ g e | ■ �• q- q§ '- | Vie) 8' �) !!Man! R if § ! ! � �� ■ �■ �: », �i #; �; #i �� - \ | � i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY j AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: / �/�} 1 10 DATE SUBMITTED: February 5�, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval. of OLCC Applications PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson REQUESTED BY: Various Applicants DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: - CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE ' INFORMATION SUMMARY The following businesses have submitted renewal applications for Council. approval: o The Manilla Express, 12370 SW Main, DA Application o Sherwood Inn Restaurant, 15700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , DA App o Albertsons, Inc. , 12060 SW Main, PS Application o Newport Bay Seafood Broiler, 10935 SW 69th, DA Application o Tigard Thriftway, 14365 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Jackpot Food Mart, 15900 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. , PS App. o Hi Hat Restaurant, 11530 SW Pacific Hwy. , DA Application o Willowbrook Restaurant, 11525 SW Durham Rd. , R Application o Colonial Texaco, 11465 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Coco's Famous Hamburgers, 10900 SW 69th, R Application o Bannings Restaurant, 11477 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Safeway Store, 250 Tigard Shoppinm Plaza, PS Application o Plaid Pantry #24, 11006 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Plaid Pantry #63, 11545 SW Durham Road, PS Application o Plaid Pantry #19, 15485 SW Hall Blvd. , PS Application o Plaid Pantry #149, 11705 SW Pacific Hwy. , Suite A, PS App. o Pietro's Gold Coast Pizza, 13405 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Round Table Piz-.-a, 11940 SW Pacific Hwy. , R Application o Fred Meyer, Inc. , 11665 SW Pacific Hwy. , PS Application o Fred Meyer, Inc./Eve's Restaurant, 11565 SW Pacific Hwy. , R App. o Paylass Drug Stores NW, 12080 SW Main Street, PS Application o L'Ecurie, 12386 SW Main, Dispenser C Application The following businesses have submitted change of ownership for Council approval: o Swift Mart #17, 9800 SW Shady Lane, PS Application {with change of ownership store is to be called Star Market The Police Department has conducted records and background checks and the Acting Chief of Police recommends approval of all applications. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve all applications. 2. Approve some applications. 3. Deny application requests. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve all applications. lw/3585A A CITYO TIVi4IMI WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON POLICE DEPARTMENT INTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TOs a Lorean Wilson _ DATE: 1-23-86 MOMS Det. Lt. L. Branstetter SUBJECT: Liquor License renewal applicants The following applicants records have been checked through 1983, Department files and found clot to have any violations. r 9020 S.W.B RNHAM •P.O.BOX 23397•TIGARD,OREGON 97223 • PH:639-6168 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Lonnie Branstetter January 15, 1986 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications Please process the background checks on the following businesses and make recommendation for Council approval on 2/10/86. Your report should be returned to me by FEBRUARY 5, 1986. N.C. LII Enterprises Inc. The Manilla Express 12370 SW Main Tigard, OR 97223 DA Application Sherwood Inn Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. 15700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97271 DA Application Albertsons Inc. Alber•tsons Food Center No. 544 12060 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 PS Application lw/3585A a T'FA W sHw4a ON GouWY.OREGON POLICE DEPARTMENT INTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TOt Lorean Wilson DATE: 1-28-86 >lRoMl Det. Lt. L. Branstetter SUMCTt Liquor license renewals _- The following liquor license holders have been checked for violation during the past year of 1985 and show no violations. NEWPORT BAY ONE INC. WILLOWBROOK RESTAURANT TIGARD THRIFTWAY COLONIAL TEXACO JACKPOT FOOD MART COCOAS HAMBURGERS HI HAT RESTAURANT BANKINGS RESTAURANT d 9020 S.W.BUR NHAM •P.O.BOX 23397•TK3ARD,OREGON 97223 • PH:838 81ee s mom MEMORANDUM F; CITY OF T'IGARD, OREGON TO: Lonnie Branstetter January 27, 1986 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications Please process the background checks on he ollowingu businesses reportshod make recommendation for Council app roval returned to me by FEBRUARY 5_,__19116. APPLICATIONS: RENEWAL � :.N �,rt g� .pn®::..Inc.=�` ` Benz. George & Theresa & Kathleen Mooers Newport Bay Seafood Broiler Willowbrook Restaurant 11525 SW Durham Road, Tigard 10935 SW 69th, Tigard R Application DA Application o�� 03A Inc. .�L Amirrazvani„ Amir & Sakineh � � Colonial Texaco Tigard Thriftway igard 11465 SW Pacific Higway, Tigard 14365 SW Pacific Hwy. , T PS Application PS Application Grace Restaurant Company jackpot-Food--Mart Coco's Famous Hamburgers #116�j��1� 15900 SW Upper So ones ferry Rd. 10900 SW 69th Avenue, Tigard Tigard, Or. R Application PS Application ,:_ staurant`-e Bannings Restaurant & Pie House 115Hat Re 11477 SW Pacific Hwy. , Tigard 11530 SW Pacific Hwy. , Tigard DA Application R Application CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP - NEW APPLICATION: Jin Geun Seong & Mi Ran Seong, Swift Mart #17 location, to be called Star Market, 9900 SW Shady Lane, Tigard, OR, PS Application. 1w/3585A aTY(WWARD )NASHINGMN OOUNTY.OREGON POLICE DEPARMENT INTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Lorean Wilson DATE: 1-28-86 FRO.: Det. Lt. L. Branstetter SU&MCT: New ownership applicant liquor license SEONG, Jin Geun SEONG', Mi Ran dba Swift Mart #17 9800 S.W. Shady Ln. Tigard, Orn Applicants have been checked for criminal records finding no record. 9020$W Bl iAM •P.O.SOX 23397�T93ARD.OREGON 97223 • PH:6394188 CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON POLICE DEPARTMENT INTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Lorean Wilson DATE: 2-3-86 FROM: Det. Lt. L. Branstetter SUBJECT: Liquor License renewals The following Liquor outlets have been checked through Department files for violations during 1985 finding them to be clear. Safeway Store #383 Pietro's Pizza Plaid Pantry #24 Plaid Pantry #19 Plaid Pantry #63 Plaid Pantry #149 r 9020 S.W.BURNHAM • P.O.BOX 23397•TIGARD,OREGON 97223 • PH:639-6168 4' MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON January 30, 1986 TO; Lonnie Branstetter FROM: Loreen WilsonQ.,t O _ SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications and make Please process the background checks on 2�10�861ow1You ng ru report sshould be ' recommendation for Council approval returned to me by FEBRUARY 5 1986• RENEWAL APPLICATIONS: Store #383 pietro's Gold Coast Pizza Parlor Safeway 13405 SW Pacific Highway 250 Tigard Shopping Plaza Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 R Application ' PS Application Plaid Pantry #19 Plaid Pantry #24 15485 SW Hall Blvd. x" 11006 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 PS Application PS Application _ Plaid Pantry # Plaid Pantry #63 Suite A 11545 SW Durham Rd. 11705 SW Pacific Hwy. ,c Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 pS Application PS Application lw/3585A MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Lonnie Branstetter January 28, 1986 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications Please process the background checks on the following businesses and snake recommendation for Council approval on 2/10/86. Your report should be returned to me by FEBRUARY 5, 1986. RENEWAL APPLICATIONS: Castle Pizza/Limited Pizza Ent. Payless Drug Stores NW, Inc. Round Table Pizza 12080 SW Main Street 11940 SW Pacific Hwy. PS Application R Application Fred Meyer Inc. Fred Meyer Inc./Eve's Restaurant 11565 SW Pacific Hwy. 11565 SW Pacific Hwy. PS Application R Application Columbia Cuisine Inc. L'Ecurie 12386 SW Main Dispenser C Application lw/3585A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: February 10, 1986 _ AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: Februa_r_y_5, 1986 PREVIGUS ACTION: .Accepted Proiect Compliance Agreement & Performance Bond ISSUElAGENDA T11-LE: Windsor P1 Subd On Nov. 25th 1985 (Letter of Commitment) Partial Bond PREPARED BY: Engineering Division Release No. 1 REQUESTED BY: John Hagman DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1) The project is located at the old Metzger Sewerage Treatment Plant site, adjacent to 106th Avenue and Black Diamond Way. 2) Construction has progressed satisfactorily and, subsequently, the developer (Howard-Kim Inc.) has requested release of installation guarantee monies for that portion of the work which is complete. 3) Staff has reviewed the request and hereby recommends that the Council authorize release of the amount(s) detailed in the attached summary. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to execute a letter in behalf of the City, providing for a partial release of installation guarantee monies for Windsor Place Subdivision, in the amount of one hundred fifty five thousand three hundred thirty five dollars and ninty six cents ($155,335.96). (1943P) Pte,. February 11, 1986 I TWOR'2 WASHINGTON COUNTY,CIRMSEIGSON Howard-Kim Inc. 10900 HE 8th, Suite #900 Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Winston Place Subdivision (Letter of Commitment Partial Release) Dear Ms. Howard: In the matter of the Two hundred twenty six thousand one hundred seventy six dollars and sixty five cents ($226,176.65) Letter of Commitment, between Howard-Kim, Inc., and the City of Tigard, Oregon and Continental-Oregon, Inc.; this is to serve as official notice to allow said Continental-Oregon, Inc. to release to Howard-Kim. Inc. a portion of the deposit entrusted to said Continental-Oregon, Inc.. The amount hereby authorized to be released is one hundred 'fifty five thousand three hundred thirty five dollars and ninty six cents (;155,335.96). The amount to remain entrusted to Continental-Oregon, Inc. as a cash performance bond to mesura the City that all remaining requirements of said Subdivision are completed, shall be seventy thousand eight 'hundred forty t' dollars and sixty nine cents (970,840.69). This notice shall not be construed to nullify or alter the terms of the aforesaid Letter of Commitment in any way; it is merely an authorization to release a portion of the entrusted monies. City of Tigard, Oregon 1 By; E -� r ---Mayor City Recorder (JH:bs/101) 12755 SW.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:6,39-4171