The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 01/20/1986 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS & STUDY AGENDA sign-up sheet(s) . If no sheet is available, JANUARY 20, 1986, 7:00 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 10865 SW WALNUT asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Rol]. Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non--Agenda Items: Motion to approve as amended 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. PRESENTATION OF KEYS TO THE CITY o Mayor 4. WASHINGTON COUNTY ISSUES REPORT o Quarterly Visit By Commissioner Rogers 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE l_IO FINAL ASSESSMENT o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges p Summation By Finance Director o Public Testimony: Written Objections Only - o Recommendation by Finance Director o Council Questions Or Comments a Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council o Ordinance No. 86- - Adoption of Reassessment Amounts 6. PARKS AND RECREATION REPORT o Planning Staff 7. CIVIC CENTER PROJECT REPORT o Assistant to City Administrator and Civic Center Advisory Committee 8. URBAN SERVICES POLICY PLAN o Assistant to City Administrator 9. NO PARKING DESIGNATION AT ASH & COMMERCIAL - ORDINANCE NO. 86- 0 Engineering Services Manager 10. MUNICIPAL CODE REVISIONS .1 Amending Election Petition Form Requirements - Ordinance No. 86- .2 Amending Mayor Filing Requirements - Ordinance No. 86- .3 Adding Restriction of Access Rights - Ordinance No. 86- Legal Counsel PAGE 1 COUNCIL:. AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1986 - 11. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be - ` enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 11.1 Approve Council Minutes: January 10, 11, & 13, 1986 11.2 Receive and File: o Community Development Land Use Decisions o Community Assistant Temporary Position Memo 11.3 Approve Council Calendar Update 11.4 Approve OLCC Applications: o Los Baez Restaurant - 11475 SW Pacific Highway (formerly Shakey's Pizza) - New Outlet requesting Dispenser Class C & Restaurant licenses. o Floyd & Marine Bergmann, Bergmann's Restaurant, 12725 SW Pacific Highway - R application renewal o Clarence J. Hess & Ho Fung, Lone Oak Restaurant (Shin Shin), 11920 SW Pacific Highway - Class A application renewal o Chow Yuen-Cheung, So William Tat Wing, Lim Yee-Ten, & Chan Loi-Fu, Silver Palace, 14455 SW Pacific Highway - Class A application renewal o Mary A. Dreeszan, Ron's Green Valley Tavern, 12470 SW Main - RMB Application renewal 11.5 Authorize Appointment of City Recorder & Finance Director officers r 11.6 Authorize Letter Requesting Shareback To Cities In County Law Enforcement Levy 11.7 Receive and File Computer Master Plan Status Report 11.8 Approve Proposed Dartmouth LID ,#40 Engineering Contract With R. A. Wright Engineering, Inc. ® 11.9 Accept Public Improvements With Conditions -- Penn Lawn Estates - E Res. No. 86-13 11.10 Approve Penn Lawn Estates Partial Bond Release #2 - Res. No. 86-14 11.11 Approve Refund For Street Lights - Anton Park Subdivision 11.12 Accept Corrected Street Dedication - Self Service Furniture - SW Gaarde Street 12. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d) & (h) to discuss public employee hiring, pending/current litigation and labor relations issues. 14. APPROVE POLICE CHIEF JOB DESCRIPTION AND TRAITS CRITERION 15. ADJOURNMENT lw/3596A COUNCIL AGENDA -- JANUARY 20, 1986 - PAGE 2 NEE T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 20, 1986 - 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian (arrived at 7:04 PM), and Jerry Edwards; City Staff; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; Jerri Widner, Finance Director and Acting City Administrator; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. Mayor Cook noted the Council would act as a 'committee in the round' until Councilor Brian arrived. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. None were requested. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. No one appeared to speak. 4. PRESENTATION OF KEYS TO THE CITY a. Mayor Cook presented a Key to the City to Councilor Scott noting that she is relocating with her family to Texas. Council and staff expressed their appreciation to Councilor Scott for her service to the City. b. Councilor Scott expressed appreciation to the Council, staff, and citizens noting she will take many memories of Tigard and Oregon with her. COUNCILOR BRIAN ARRIVED: 7:04 P.M. 5. WASHINGTON COUNTY ISSUES REPORT a. County Commissioner Roy Rogers appeared to speak with Council regarding various county--wide issues which impact the Tigard area. Some areas of discussion were the need of funding for the proposed bypass through the Sherwood/Edy Road area and urban services studies. He commended the City for their efforts to work jointly with City of Beaverton to mutually agree on urban growth boundaries. b. Councilor Brian stated he specifically wishes more projects from the Tigard area to be added to the MSTIP proposed bond. He noted the law enforcement levy could only be supported by himself if X' there were a shareback formula to cities included in the proposal. t, C. Councilor Edwards expressed concerns regarding the law enforcement ' levy and the lack of a shareback to cities along with transportation issues. d. Mr. Kenneth Scheckla, audience member from Tigard, expressed z desire to have jurisdiction of Durham Road turned over to City of Tigard. Commissioner Roy Rogers stated that road is a major link in the County transportation plan and doubted that jurisdiction would be relinquished to City. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 20, 1986 6. PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE LID FINAL ASSESSMENT a. Public Hearing Opened b. Finance Director summarized history of project noting that all interest was computed from 5/10/82 for the pre-assessment and from 8/18/82 for the deficit assessment. She recommended the refunds be given after all outstanding interest is paid to date. C. Public Testimony No written objections were received. d. Finance Director recommended approval of the ordinance with the note of the interest computation date and the requirement that all outstanding interest be paid in full to date prior to release of any refunds. e. Public Hearing Closed f. ORDINANCE NO. 86--03 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE FINAL_ ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SPREADING THE FINAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LID 21 - 72ND AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS. g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt Ordinance No. 86-03 noting that all interest was computed from 5/10/82 for the pre-assessment and from 8/18/82 for the deficit assessment, and requiring all refunds be given after any and all outstanding interest is paid to date. 8. URBAN SERVICES POLICY PLAN a. Brian Hartung, Community Assistant, presented the updated report highlighting target dates, development of formulas for the study and the 9/16/86 election date which is tentatively set for sending the issue of the Metzger Annexation to the voters. b. Councilor Brian stated the Council's position is not to initiate the annexation of the Metzger area but will forward any petition from the citizens to the Boundary Commission. C. Discussion followed regarding the Washington Square/Metzger Annexation. It was noted that the Metzger residents would not be paying any existing bonded indebtedness which the City currently has if annexed. 9. ORDINANCE NO. 86-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF SW ASH AVENUE, AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. a. Acting Chief of Police Jennings presented the request by the Fire Department for restricted parking along Ash Avenue at the intersection of Commercial Street to allow for movement of fire emergency equipment. Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES -JANUARY 20, 1986 b. After discussion, Councilor Edwards moved to adopt Ordinance No, 86-04. Motion seconded by Councilor Brian. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10. AUDIENCE RECOGNITION a. Mayor Cook welcomed Cub Pack #799/Den 5 to the meeting and stated they were observing government in action. 11. PARKS AND RECREATION REPORT a. Since no member of the Park and Recreation Board was present to discuss the report with Council, consensus was to withdraw the matter for future consideration. 12. CIVIC CENTER PROJECT REPORT Civic Center Advisory Committee Members present: Valerie Johnson, Chairperson; Carolyn Eadon; and Craig Hopkins. a. Committee Chairperson discussed dates of tentative move to Civic Center building noting March 15, 1986 as substantial completion date of the building, with final completion scheduled for April 15, 1986. The Committee recommended Council consider approving the addition of windows in the Police Department. After considerable discussion, Council requested staff check with surrounding Police Departments regarding the advisability of adding windows in the police offices, investigate the cost of windows vs closed circuit TV, and check with the Tigard Police Department staff. b. Councilor Brian requested staff write memo to file regarding the City's concern with subsequent damage along the Police Department where scaffolding fell and exposed the exterior wall during the curing process. C. Legal Counsel advised Council that an agreement is being prepared for the Contractor to sign which will speak to the lack of insurance provided by the Contractor and will require coverage by a certain date. 13. MUNICIPAL CODE REVISIONS a. Legal Counsel synopsized the history of each proposed code change noting state revised election laws, clarification of filing requirements for Mayor's position by Council members, and the need for more Police authority to restrict access to secured crime areas. b. ORDINANCE NO. 86-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AMENDING SECTION 2.40.010 AND 2.40.020 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW REGARDING ELECTION PETITION FORMS FOR CITY COUNCIL POSITIONS, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 20, 1986 x;. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. f' Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. d. ORDINANCE NO. 86-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AMENDING SECTION 2.40.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE FURTHER DEFINING FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MAYOR'S POSITION BY TIGARD CITY COUNCIL_ MEMBERS, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. e. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. f. ORDINANCE NO. 86-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 TO ADD CHAPTER 7.50, AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO CERTAIN AREAS. g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 14. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 14.1 Approve Council Minutes: January 10, 11, & 13, 1986 14.2 Receive and File: o Community Development Land Use Decisions o Community Assistant Temporary Position Memo 14.3 Approve Council Calendar Update 14.4 Approve OLCC Applications: o Las Baez Restaurant - 11475 SW Pacific Highway (formerly Shakey's Pizza) - New Outlet requesting Dispenser Class C & Restaurant licenses. o Floyd & Marine Bergmann, Bergmann's Restaurant, 12725 SW Pacific Highway - R application renewal o Clarence J. Hess & Ho Fung, Lone Oak Restaurant (Shin Shin), 11920 SW Pacific Highway - Class A application renewal o Chow Yuen-Cheung, So William Tat Wing, Lim Yee-Ten, & Chan Loi-Fu, Silver Palace, 14455 SW Pacific Highway - Class A application renewal o Mary A. Dreeszan, Ron's Green Valley Tavern, 12470 SW Main - RMB Application renewal 14.5 Authorize Appointment of City Recorder & Finance Director officers 14.6 Authorize Letter Requesting Shareback To Cities In County Law Enforcement Levy 14.7 Receive and File Computer Master Plan Status Report 14.8 Approve Proposed Dartmouth LID #40 Engineering Contract With R. A. Wright Engineering, Inc. 14.9 Accept Public Improvements With Conditions - Penn Lawn Estates - Res. No. 86-13 14.10 Approve Penn Lawn Estates Partial Bond Release #2 - Res. No. 86-14 14.11 Approve Refund For Street Lights - Anton Park Subdivision 14.12 Accept Corrected Street Dedication - Self Service Furniture - SW Gaarde Street Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 20, 1986 x a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to remove item 14.8 for consideration at a future meeting and approve the remaining portion of the Consent Agenda. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 15. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff a. No items were discussed. RECESS: 8:20 P.M. RECONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION: 8:25 P.M. 16. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (a), (d) 6 (h) to discuss public employee hiring, pending/current litigation and labor relations issues. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: 9:15 P.M. RECONVENE IN REGULAR OPEN SESSION: 9:15 P.M. 17. APPROVE POLICE CHIEF JOB DESCRIPTION AND TRAITS CRITERION a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt the performance traits on the memo of 1/20/86 and the police chief job description, subject to Council approval on the at-will doctrine. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. ADJOURN REGULAR SESSION AND RECONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION: (under QRS sections cited above) 9:16 P.M. 18. ADJOURNMENT: 10:05 P.M. r� Deputy City Recorder - City of Tigard ATTEST: r - City of Tigard LW/3667A Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 20, 1986 LISHING COMPANY Legal 7-6595 TIMES PUt� Not P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(53)684-0360 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 1 Notice Advertising R�C�IVE Legal i ;A rr D • E3Tearsheet Notice � r1z,,,36• City of Tigard P.o. Lox 23397 s ❑ Duplicate Affidavit /ry OF T�GgRO • Tigard, ..,R 97223 • 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. !, lasing first duly sworn, depose and say that i am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk,of the !P1�� a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 he and 593.020; published a aforesaid county and state;that the t f which is hereto annexed, was published in the a printed COPY o successive and entire issue of said newspaper for----- consecutive in the following issues: s Subscribed nd"sw �bel*10 me this Janes—�' i otary Public for Oregon /Commission Expires: 9_ __ /88 &FIDAVIT g Y " !"A '""x 3•.. ' yy t 1�� Ye�%9'E'.��ys'^�t��f' rT.S�, 1 r v CI1Y OF TLGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF P05IING I In the Matter of thea PruUus(ed n ' 1 STATE OF OREGON ) a County of Washington) ss F City of Ti rd ) Rc,,j being first duly sworn, on oath depose � and s s That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) which were adopted at the Coun i 1 Meetin dated copy(s) of said ordinance(s) being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the Vg 7h day of 198 ip RO J-A and Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of _sP U Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: ,�'�� E % CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO, 86-025 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE FINAL FNGI:NFER's REPORT AND SPREADING THE FINAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LID 21-72nd AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing January 20, 1986 to review the final assessments, and WHEREAS, the preliminary final engineer 's report and proposed final assessments were reviewed and approved by Tigard City Council with no changes. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 The attached engineers' repur-t is the final engineers' report for LID 21-72nd Avenue Area Street Improvements. Section 2. The attached Exhibit A is the final assessment roll for LID 21-72nd Avenue Area Street Improvements. Section 3. Interest at the rate of 9.09% from August 18, 1982 through January 31, 1986, has been added to the difference between the pre-assessed amount and final assessed amount in cases where the pre--assessment was more than the i final assessment. Section 4. Council directs tfollowing notify property ownerof their inalassessmentand to implement he section Section 5. For those properties that were pre-assessed more than the final assessment the following shall apply: If the pre-assessment was paid in full, a check in the amount of over assessment will be sent by the City to the property owner as listed in the final assessment roll. If more than one name is listed the last or name marked as purchaser will receive the refund. If the pre--assessment has an amount owing, a credit in the amount of over assessment will be applied against the account balance and further overages (if any), will. then be refunded by check to the property owner as listed in the final assessment roll. For those properties that were pre-assessed less than the final assessment the following shall apply: The property owner will have 10 days from the date of this ordinance to determine if they wish to pay in cash or apply to make installment payments. Interest will begin to accrue at the rate of 13% per annum from �i. January 31, 1986 until paid. ORDINANCE N0, 86-Q Page 1 PASSED By 1,�h� mo��, vote of all Council members present after {{ bei read by number and title only, this _.2 � day 4 of 1986. G i �Loreen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This day of .� 1986. f , n-£. Cooter 1205F °Y. ORDINANCE NO. 86 G3 Page 2 y WEA, F. N y CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86— QUI AN ORDINANCE. AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28 OF 1-HE TIGARD MUNICIPAL_ CODE BY ADDING TO SECT 10N 10.'28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF SW ASH AVENUE, AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 10.28. 130 of the 1-igard Municipal Code, relating to locations where parking is prohibited at any time, be, and the same is heroby amended and supplemented to add thereto a new subsection reading as follows: "10.28. 130 Prohibited at any time, No person shall at any time park or leave standing a vehicle of any kind or character, whether motorized or not, and whether attended or unattended, within the following defined portions of public streets and highways within the City: ►tai x-x x ( ) On the northwesterly half of S.W. Ash Avenue beginning at the northeast right—of-way line of S.W. Commercial. Street and extending thence northeasterly one hundred thirty eight feet . Section 2: That the City Administrator be and he is hereby authorized and directed to cause to have the areas in which parking is prohibited as above set forth suitably posted in the manner provided by law. Section 3: This ordinance shall be effective on and after the 31st day after its passage by the Council, and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By _ L-4 rce., , r vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this c�71` day of _�c- . �. 1986. Loreen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This _ ?-A _ day of ,T . _ 1986. Jo EY Cook, 'Mayor (JH:pm16) ORDINANCE NO. 96 C L Page 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86–_n4f-2: AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL_ AMENDING SECI—ION 2.40.010 AND 2.40.020 OF 1"HE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW REGARDING ELECTION PETITION FORMS FOR CITY COUNCIL POSITIONS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Chapter 808, Section 11, Oregon Laws 1985, amends ORS 249.009 to require that candidates running for city office use the petition form designated by the Secretary of State; and WHEREAS, that change requires amendments to Section 2.40.010 and 2.40.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code to comply with the State Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 2.40.010 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows (underlining indicates new language and brackets, [], indicate language to be deleted: "Petition—Form[--Conformance to Exhibit A required.x] The form of nominating petition for all candidates for elective positions within the city shall substantially conform to the [wording and makeup appearing on the] form designated by the Secretary of State. [entitled "Nominating Petition, City of Tigard, Oregon" denoted "Exhibit A" and by reference herein made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full .] [* Exhibit A is on file in the City Recorder's office.]" Section 2: Section 2.40.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows (underlining indicates new language and brackets, [], indicate language to be deleted: "Nomination Acceptance [Petition]---Form- . Furnished by City Recorder.* The City Recorder is authorized and directed to furnish, upon nomination of a candidate for elective positions within the City, [request to any elector of the City forms and nominating petition] a notification of nomination and acceptance of nomination form conforming to "Exhibit A" [for use in the nomination of a candidate or candidates for any elective City position]. x Exhibit A is on file in the City Recorder's office." Section 3: This ordinance shall be effective on the 31st day after its enactment by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this 71-. d_ay_gf _j�_��,,, 1986. L reen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: 'This c�Tr^ y of _ 1986. da 7ohn E. Cook, Mayor lw/3594A a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 86— Q 30 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL IL AMENDING ING SECTION Ef'1ENTS FOR THE OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE FURTHER DEFINING POSITION BY TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. _ roved amendments to the Tigard City Charter, WHEREAS, the Tigard voters app at the November 5, 1985 including Section 7, entitled MAYOR AND COUNCIL, general. election; and require further clarification in Section 2.40.030 of WHEREAS, those changesre u.rements for the Mayor's the Tigard Municipal Code regarding the filing q position by other Council members. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: by Secton_i: Section 2.40.030 of the 4antll set forth below,e shall band existingco adding a new subsection (1) as underlined subsections (1) and (2) shall become subsections (2) and (3)• 1 At the time of i In with that n of a o or f shall submit a whose term would over resi ma nation in the form re ired by the Charter• and" Section 2: This ordinance shall be effective on the 31st day after its en approval by the Mayor. enactment by the City Council and vote of all Council members present after PASSED: By 1 tor' n yr"'`'`'S this � day bei read by number and title only, of 1986. 40rcen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder 1986. APPROVED: APPROVED: This -�---- day °f ohn E. Cook, Mayor i lw/3592A ORDINANCE NO. 86— O�' page 1 ,r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON fT ORDINANCE NO. 86--o AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 7 TO ADD CHAPTER 7.50, AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO CERTAIN AREAS. WHEREAS, when there is a threat to the public health or safety, there may be a need for the Tigard Police Department to restrict or deny access to persons to the area where such threat exists, when the presence of such persons in such area would constitute a danger to themselves, or when a police officer reasonably believes that the presence of such persons would substantially interfere with the performance of the police or other emergency services, and WHEREAS, in the course of a criminal investigation it may become necessary for an officers of the Tigard Police Department to restrict or deny access to certain areas or evidence during the course of the investigation, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to make provision for the reasonable access to areas under investigation by members of the media for the purposes of news gathering and reporting, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Chapter 7.50 is added to Title 7 of the Tigard Municipal Code as follows: "Chapter 7.50 AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO CERTAIN AREAS Sections: 7.50.010 Threat to Health or Safety 7.50.020 Criminal Investigation 7.50.030 Restrict or Deny Access 7.50.040 Unlawful to Enter or to Refuse to Leave 7.50.050 News Media 7.50.060 Violations 7.50.010 Threat to Health or Safety_. Whenever a threat to the public health or safety is created by any fire, explosion, accident, cave—in, or similar emergency, catastrophe, or disaster, or by disturbance, riot, presence of an armed person, hostage being held, or other disturbance, an officer of the Police Department may restrict or deny access to persons to the area where such threat exists, for the duration of such threat, when the presence of such persons in such area would constitute a danger to themselves or when such officer reasonably believes that the presence of such persons would substantially interfere with the performance of the police or other emergency services. ORDINANCE NO. 86— 07 Page 1 7 50 020 Criminal Investigation. Whenever it appears to be reasonably necessary to investigate, or to preserve or collect evidence of, criminal acts, an officer of the Police Department may restrict or deny access to any room, building, or enclosure, or any open area, by cordoning off such area by the use of persons, vehicles, ropes, markers or any other means. 7.50.030 _Restrict or Denv Access. As used in this Chapter "restrict or deny access means that the officers of the Police Department have the authority to regulate or prohibit the presence or movement of persons or vehicles to, from, or within any area, to evacuate persons and to move or remove any property therefrom, until the reason for such restriction or denial of access no longer exists. 7.50.040 Unlawful to Enter or to Refuse to Leave. It is unlawful for any person to enter or to refuse to leave any area closed or restricted in access pursuant to Section 7.50.010 or Section 7.50.020 above, unless such person has specific statutory authority or the permission of the on-scene ranking officer of the Police Department to be within such area. 7.50.050 News Media. In accordance with the authority granted by this Chapter, and in consideration of the law enforcement and emergency services needs involved, provision shall be made for reasonable access to such areas by members of the media for the purpose of news gathering and reporting. 7.50.060 Violations. Violation of this Chapter shall be punishable in accordance with Section 7.28.040 of the Tigard Municipal Cade. PASSED: By C.i nCtzi vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, thisL,T3� day Of �i 4�c,�.- ..� 1986. .preen R. Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPROVED: This c:� j day of1986. John -F. Cook, Mayor iw/3613A ORDINANCE NO. 86- C 2 Page 2 ®w� ulN 6- U, :> Un U7 H Cr ri L,i c i W X w-. co Ul) W z w z r P. ?. dell rte' ¢ d ex r-i H i...lLi w u.l £ £ t� Cr C: J .•+ LJ 41 ON N w Aj ¢ CL U C 1 U s J 1 ¢ LA- .-�i m, LL- .- m L J U LL a L. CL w a ¢ U > O O rf .� a ¢ r:! U ra f6 C7 ftl Ca £ £ S = SUSS = Er � S b 0 £ i tprl •V Q 41£ L M +� £ L d a. •,. .. .M .. CLD .. Q :I41 a � hUhUhUt' ^ U ^ O L4J W s c cq o� �o ko ++ O 'r .•� N to ria t r¢ J w rd 3 S 3 CsS a a 2 a 3 til HIw Z a rnva0 ¢ J cg a rn cu W p, W • H a O a s p .3 d C .Ci y ! 4-3hw 1� a a L 7 a in z O en O £ ^ O s oU ..r oe .•+ w CG N U .+ •-r ¢ J J U ►Ji i + 4 4- 0 a Q H CL co H to V U CA rn '.+ U Z UQ •.r s RI m T O ¢ O O rd O ••+ C 7 £ S EI i 0 L S a i U 2 U L a CL J t8 r .�i y, Z 40 .ai d 7 £ I e0►f +� £ fig 3 !- £ 3 £ +� £ 3 4J a i t x a •.+ a s F-+ o. o a o. o s c. y, t0 U 71c h J ^ lL U h Li h U ^ w Id —i .�...+ -0 N m L e s a CL :3 :3 s ¢ � UF' F- C-4 ` of z L s a �K 7K W W co AGENDA ITEM # 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE 1-20-86 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council January 16, 1986 FROM: Loreen Wilson, Recorde0j-P SUBJECT: Keys To The City A key plaque is being presented to Councilor Scott for her service the past three years on the City Council lwt3585A MEMORANDUM / CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON January 14, 1986 TO, Mayor and City Council g FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator ' SUBJECT: City--County Issues Discussion With Commissioner Rogers X k General City-County Relations: o Urban Services and Annexation Policy (City input?) o Interim Urban Services Agreements (City-County and County-City contracts for services in unincorporated areas inside City's growth areas) ut to City's ultimate growth boundary) o Active Plan Agreements (o tTransportation: 0 MSTIP o County Gas Tax • County Road Jurisdiction Transfer To City (10074 as requested) o Murray Connection at 135th Law Enforcement: 0 Law Enforcement Levy and share Back o Contract With City (e.g. Walnut area) o Metzger annexation transition and maintenance of services agreement after annexation until start-up of services by City o County Sheriff Patrol Service District Library o Service District 0 1-Year Levy Extension 0 Automation Agreement prior to user's agreement? I lw/3585A DATE 1-20-86 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) ' Item Description: #5 - PUBLIC HEARIJG � 72ND AVENUE LID FINAL ASSESSMENT Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t AGENDA OF: JANUARY 20 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED- January 7 1986 _ PREVIOUS ACTION: Council study session I ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: ORDINANCE SPREADING FINAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PREPARED BY: J. Widner LID 21--72nd AVENUE T IMP STREEROVE. REQUESTED BY: J. Widner DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Continuation of policy adopted by City Council for completion of local improvement districts. INFORMATION SUMMARY At the City Council meeting of January 13, 1986, the preliminary final engineers report was reviewed. From this study session, a public hearing was called to spread the final assessments on LID 21--•72nd Avenue Area Street Improvements. The public hearing on the final assessment ordinance is this evening. The ordinance for this purpose is attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED n/a SUGGESTED_ ACCTION I recommend passage of the attached ordinance spreading the final assessments. 1207F CITY OF TIGARD FINAL E N G I Iv R'S 9EP0RT LID 21 S. W. 72nd AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS TIGARD 9 OREGON DECEMBER 9 1985 80. 194. 118 DE HAAS Suits S.W. AGC erceC v 1�e•iL 9450 S.W.Commerce Circle % q5 Wilsonville,Oregon 97070 & . . : ss®ciates, Inc. (503) ssa-naso � Consuihng Engineers&Syvevors i E t � 1 t L.I.D. NO. 21 S.W. 72nd AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT i December. 1985 This Final Engineer's Report follows the full completion of the project, including all right-of-way acquisi- tion prodeedings. f This basic street and storm drain project involved over 2 1/2 miles of street improvements, 142 parcels of Land and encompassed approximately three hundred seventy (370) acres. t The conditions of the original roadway were generally as follows: ! 1. Roadway width was generally two lanes of pavement 20-24 feet total width and rapidly failing in many areas. f 2. Drainage facilities consisted mostly of roadside ditches and undersized culverts. 3. The "S" curves at the north end of the project were very steep, had sharp curves, had poor sight distance and a portion of this section had been constructed entirety off the right-of-way. 4. The Bonita Road intersection was in a hole with steep grades and poor sight distance-on alt four approaches. The Bonita Road intersection had flooding problems with Ball Creek being diked up on the N.E. side and a sanitary sewer tine perched on the dike. 5. The Carmen Drive - Boones Ferry - 72nd Avenue intersection was unsignalized, congested with traffic, had poor s=ght disrances, caused long delays in making turning movements and was a generally hazardous installation. Traffic volumes were too high for the existing facility. 6. The Durham Road - Boones Ferry Road intersection was unsignalized and confusing to the motorist. 7. Both railroad crossings were very rough. The condition of the spur crossing required trucks to slow to less than 10 mph to prevent damage to loads. 8. Turning movements for trucks were difficult, requiring trucks to swing into oncoming traffic lanes to make turns leaving the roadway. 9. The roadway was generally not adequate to handle existing traffic volumes. After improvements, the following conditions prevailed: 1. The new roadway was built to a 40-foot width consisting of two 14-foot travel lanes and a continuous 12-foot left turn lane. Taper sections were constructed where appropriate. 2. Structural base was designed to handle projected volumes over a 20-year period. 3. An adequate drainage system was installed to accommodate the entire project, including enclosing Batt Creek in a 96" culvert in the Bonita Road intersection. 4. The "S" curves at the north end of the project were improved to reduce the grade from a maximum of over 12% to a maximum of 8.2%, to ease the curves from a 200-foot radius to radii of 350 and 400 feet. In addition, the alignment was revised to bring the roadway back within the right-of-way. 5. The Bonita Road intersection was raised to provide adequate approach grades and sight distance. • Ball Creek was placed in a 96" culvert, eliminating the dike. The sanitary sewer originally perched on the dike was eliminated by making a connection to a new trunk line constructed by U.S.A. 6. The Carmen Drive - Boones ferry Road - 72nd Avenue intersection was redesigned to create a tee connection of north bound 72nd Avenue with Boones Ferry Road, provide a 450-foot radius curve transition of southbound 72nd Avenue onto Boones Ferry Road and provide signalization of both intersection points. 7. The Durham Road - Boones Ferry Road intersection was improved to include left turn lanes, taper lanes and signatization. B. Railroad crossing protection facilities were widened and brought up to standard at the two crossing points. 9. Turning movements throughout the project were improved by including the continuous left turn lane, 50-foot radii at major intersections and taper lanes where appropriate. 10. Uncurbed portions of both Bonita Road to the east and Carmen Drive to the east were curbed to match up to curbing of existing Oregon State Highway improvements. y 11. Approximately 300 feet of Tech Center Drive was completed to match the new grade and alignment of 72nd Avenue. 12. The 72nd Avenue design was coordinated with the Oregon State Highway interchange project on the north to complete a continuous facility. 13. Recent signalization and improvements at the south end of 72nd and the 1-5 interchange now makes available three excellent signalized northbound - southbound accesses to 72nd Avenue from 1.5. Report - 2 + i 14. In addition, the following improvements for or by other agencies were completed during and in conjunction with the City's street improvement project: a. City of Tualatin - 36" waterline the length of the project. 4 b. Tigard Water District - 24" waterline in Bonita Road, 12" waterline in 72nd Avenue from Bonita Road south, 8" waterline crossings for Pac Trust. c. Metzger Water District - 12" waterline between spur track and main crossing planned and coordinated but never built. d. Lake Grove Water District - lower 1211 waterline at Durham Road - Boones Ferry intersection. e. General Tetephong - Underground installation on Boones Ferry from Carmen Drive south to Durham Road, underground installation through new connection of 72nd northbound to Boones Ferry, underground installation of 72nd from Fir to Landmark and underground installation in Bonita Road. Inasmuch as the project was very targe, involved a great number of property owners and was heavily debated at the council and within the community, it is proper to preface this report with a brief outline of the basic decisions that led to the final project design and configuration and the selection of the final assessment method. A. The Preliminary Engineeras_Re__port proposed a project generally outlined as follows: *� 1. General Features a. A 44-foot curbed section-to include two 15-foot travel lanes along with a 14-foot center median to accommodate left-turn refuges. b. Landscaping to include curbed islands in the median where not necessary for left-turn refuges, and appropriate street trees behind the curb. c. Traffic signalization at three (3) intersections. d. Railroad Grade Crossing Protection (Automatic Gates) at two (2) crossings. V e. Realignment of the 72nd Avenue - Upper Boones Ferry intersection. f. Substantial grade revision (raising) at the 72nd Avenue - Bonita Road intersection. g. Sidewalks along one side of the improvements. h. Tri-Met turnouts at five (5) locations. i. Right-of-Way to be purchased to 60-foot width. Report - 3 2. Estimated Costs Total Est. Project Costs $3,097,137.49 Less Est. City Participation (379.111.37) Total Est. Assessable Costs $2,718,026.12 (plus R/W exceeding 550,000.00) 3. Assessment Method a. All properties fronting the roadway improvements were to be assessed at the 1981 amount established by the City of Tigard for an average local street improvement. One-half (1/2) of such costs would be spread on a front-foot basis and one-half (1/2) spread on an area basis, the area to extend back not more than 200 feet from the right-of-way. r b. The remaining assessable costs were to be spread to the total area within the district on an area basis. 8. Project Evaluation. Subsequent to the presentation of the Preliminary Engineer's Report, there were a number of public hearings and public meetings held to evaluate the project. Discussion involved a number of suggestions such as: 1. The project was too big and had too many extras. 2. Residential properties should be given exemptions or deferrals. 3. More information was needed on possible grants for railroad crossing and traffic signal funding. 4. The street could be narrower. S. An Ad Hoc committee suggested a 28-foot improvement width, substituting gravel shoulders and ditches for curbs. 6. The State or County might grant funds for assistance. After a long and involved decision process, the council asked that the Engineer prepare two designs for considerations 4 Alternate A being a basic project of 40-foot width curb to curb. Alternate 8 being a 28-foot paved surface with gravel shoulders and ditches for drainage. Upon review of the Engineer's alternate designs along with applied costs, and finding that Alternate A (the 40-foot alternate with curbs) offered a much better facility at only slightly higher costs, the Council, by Ordinance 82.13 (Exhibit F-1 attached) adopted 3/29/82, ordered the improvements outlined by Alternate A to be made. Report - 4 C. The Selected Design established for construction by the council was generally as follows: 1. General F_eV ores a. A 40-foot curbed section to include two 14-foot travel lanes along with a 12-foot paved center ` median to accommodate left-turn refuges (except Tech Center Drive, which -ias added to the project, was to be a city standard 34-foot curbed section). f b. Landscaping was eliminated. 1 c. Traffic signalixation at three (3) intersections. 4 a d. Railroad Grade crossing Protection (Automatic Gates) at two (2) crossings. e. Realignment of the 72nd Avenue - upper Boones Ferry intersection. f. Substantial grade revision (raising) at the 72nd Avenue - Bonita Road intersection. g. Sidewalks were eliminated. h. Tri-Met turnouts were eliminated. i. Right-of-Way purchases reduced to 50-foot plus 5-foot easement for roadway purposes each side, where such reduction would reduce the purchase price. 2. Estimated Costs Total Est. Project Costs $2,050,000.00 Less Est. City Participation L16.04S.00) Total Est. Assessable costs 51,533,955.00 (plus R/W exceeding $50,000.00) v 3. ►assessment Method a. Assessable costs not to exceed 51,533,955.00 exclusive of right-of-way costs exceeding 150,000.00. b. Additional costs estimated at $33,955.00 to be assessed to Weatern international Properties (Ident. No. 12a) for improvements to Tech Center Drive. Report - 5 0. Sid and Award of Construction Contract. Following usual procedures, bids were taken, with the low bidder being Columbia Excavating, Inc. at 51,628,950.75. The Engineer's Estimate was $1,837.544.00. After eliminating deductable alternates for Sidewalk Improvements and lighting Improvements, the construction contract was awarded to Columbia Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $1,550,577.80. E. Preliminary Assessment. 1. Pre-Assessment (not including R/W costs exceeding 550.000.00). a. General. Two options as to time for levying assessments were available to the City of Tigard. The first involved Levying the estimated amounts before the project was complete along with an adjust- ment assessment when the final actual costs were known. The second option was to wait until the project was complete and all costs known and then levy one final assessment. Because the threat of passage of the 1 1/2% limitation measure in the November, 1982 election would have foreclosed Tigard's ability to sell Bencroft Bonds and strip the ability of assessed property owners to make installment payments over a 10-year period (total assessments would have been due immediately), the City chose to Pre-Assess and sell bonds before the November election. b. Assessment Formula. By Ordinance 82.23 (Exhibit F-2 attached) dated 5/10/82, the Council selected an assessment method which follows: 1) Total Pre-Assessment (51,475,711.35) equals x1,500,000.00 less one-half of estimated sidewalk costs (134,773.56), less one-half of estimated street light costs ($20,505.62), plus 530,990.53 for Tech Center Drive. 2) Distribute one-half of equivalent cost of a 34-foot street to property within 200 feet of the street improvement (total cost !1,157,026.64). One-quarter of such costs ($289,256.66) are to be spread on a frontage basis and one-quarter (:289,256.66) are to be spread on an area basis over the property within 200 feet of said improvements. One-half of such costs (SS78,513.321 are to be spread on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. 3) Distribute costs of the traffic signal at 72nd (southbound) and S.W. Upper Scones Ferry Road ($66,678.15) to Pacific Realty Trust property lying southerly of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road on an area basis. 4) Distribute estimated cost to the city (520,000) for the spur-track railroad crossing protection facilities to Southern Pacific Company (Ident. No. 63) on an area basis. 5) Separate costs for construction of Tech Center Drive (530,990.53) are assessed on a one-quarter frontage and three-quarters area basis to Ident. No. 12a per agreement. 6) The remaining assessable costs (5201,016.03) are to be spread on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. Report - 6 MMMMMMM ITEM COST Frontage $289,256.66 Area (within 200 feet) 289,256.66 Signal to Pac Trust 66,678.15 Spur Xing to SPTC 8 Predetivery 20,000.00 Tech Center Drive 30,990.53 Area (total assessable) 779.529.35 TOTAL PREASSESSMENT $1,475,711.35* *Subject to increases for any right-of-way costs exceeding 550,000.00. 2. Deficit Assessment CR/W costs exceeding 250.000.00). a. General. This portion of the Preliminary Assessment was set out separately to deal with right-of-way costs exceeding 550,000.00. Inasmuch as right-of way negotiation had just begun at the time of the Pre-Assessment, reliable cost estimates could not be made at that time. The three-month delay in proceeding with the Deficit Assessment allowed time for getting well into the right-of-way negotiation process and a better evaluation of the estimated right-of-way costs. The reasons for levying this portion of the assessment before completion of the project are the same as cited for the Pre-Assessment. b. Assessment Formula. By Ordinance 82-52 (Exhibit F-3 attached) dated 8/18/82, the Council selected the same assessment method as that used for the Pre-Assessment. F. Threat of Litigation and Compromise Agreement. In July of 1982, Industrial Contract Carriers, one of the property owners being assessed, brought suit (Writ of Review) against the City and the project. while the Washington Canty Circuit Court on September 14, 1982 ruled in favor of the City, the threat of appeal and the time necessary to defend the appeal in the courts placed the City in a position where they could not sell bonds before the November, 1982 election. on September 13, 1982, in response to selective property owners, the council held a public hearing on a proposed ordinance to convert the street already under construction from a 40-foot facility to a 32-foot facility (1132-foot Compromise"). The public hearing before the council produced strong opposition to the proposed shift to a 32-foot project. No motion was made to shift to a 32-foot road and therefore the proposal failed. (� Report - 7 i -= On September 22, 1982, the issue with Industrial Contract Carriers was compromised through a settlement agreement (Exhibit F•4 attached) and a covenant not to appeal issued to the Circuit Court by Industrial Contract Carriers. The salient points of the settlement were that the City would assume a minimum 25% share of the project costs and that the City would increase efforts to reduce right•of-way and easement costs. Ordinance 82-68 (Exhibit F•5 attached) adopted September 27, 1982 confirmed the City assumption of the 25% share. G. City Participation. The amount of City participation is subject to three council actions: 1. The assessment formula set by Ordinance 82.23, adopted May 10, 1982. S Total Project Costs $2,502,608.15 Less Cap (1,475,711.35) Less R/N > 150,000 (315,787.34) Less Additional Special Assessment ( 23.109.75) Total City Participation S 688,199.71 2. The Memorandum of Settlement, September 24, 1982. Total Costs Less Additional Allowable .. Spec. Assessment (MSM) City Participation Const. $1,697,497.88 $1,625,000.00 (1,697,497.88 - $1,625,000.00) = S 72,497.88 R/Y 365,787.34 365,787.34 LASE +16.413.18 274,500.00 (416,413.18 - 274,500.00) : 1.41,913.18 52,479,698.40 52,265,287.34 (25X)(2,265,287.34) ■ S 566.321.84 Total City Participation S 780,732.90 3. Ordinance 82.68 adopted September 27, 1982. (25%)(Total Project Costs Less Additional Special Assessment) = Total City Participation (25%)($2,479,698.40) = $619,924.60 It would appear that the City participation amount has been increased by (!780,732.90 5688,199.71) a 592,533.19 as a result of the Memorandum of Settlement Agreement. M. Final Project Costs A summary of project costs is attached as Exhibit "E". Report 8 u I. Finat Assessment The final assessment affects the pre-assessment and deficit assessment in two basic areas. First, the right-of-way and easement costs have been reduced from 2555.377.50 to S365.787.34. Second, execution of the Memorandum of Settlement Agreement has increased the city participation cost by $92,533.19. The result is that the final assessment will reflect a 21.3% reduction ;f compared to the Pre-Assessment and a 57.3% reduction, if compared to the Deficit Assessment. The assessment method for the Final Assessment is the same as that established for the Preliminary Assessment. Examples of the assessment calculation for two typicat parcels are attached as Exhibits "C" and "D". The Final Assessment Map is attached as Exhibit "A". Breakdown of the project cost for assessment purposes is as follows: • Total Assessable City 1. General Assessment Formula Proiect Cost Cost Participation Basic Project (incl. $50,000.00 R/W) 52,038,620.82 51,336,834.76 $701,786.06 R/W Acquisition (excl. $50,000.00) 315,787.34 236,840.50 78,946.84 2. Original Special Assessment SPTC (Spur Track) 426,720.24 Pec Trust (Signat) 66,678.15 .H Western Int. Prop. (Tech Ctr. Dr.) 11,891.85 125,290.24 125,290.24 0.00 3. Additional Speciat Assessment Pac Trust (Sanitary Sewer) 4,957.12 SPIDCO (Sanitary Sewer) 13,427.68 Pee Trust (Aprons, etc.) 4,724.95 23.109.75 23.109.75 0.00 TOTAL S2,502,SM.15 51,722,075.25 4780,732.90 Report 9 fr Distribution of the assessment is as follows: Additional Deficit Assessment/ Final Assessment Pre-Assessment Assessment (Credit Due) General Assessment $1,573,675.26 $1,358,042.74 $505,377.52 (5289,745.00)* Pec Trust (Signal) 66,678.15 66,678.15 0.00 0.00 SPTC (Spur Track) 26,720.24 20,000.00 0.00 6,720.24 Western Int. 31,891.85 30,990.53 0.00 901.32 Pac Trust (Sanitary Sewer) 4,957.12 0.00 0.00 4,957.12 SPiDCO (Sanitary Sewer) 13,427.68 0.00 0.00 13,427.68 Pae Trust (Aprons, etc.) 4.724.95 0.00 0.00 4.724.95 $1,722,075.25 $1,475,711.42 1505,377.52 (5259,013.69) *Notes: Credits should reflect added interest at the rate of 9.09% from August 18, 1982, (the date interest charges began on the Deficit Assessment) to the date credits are effective. This Final Engineer's Report has been perpered in a manner which acknowledges all the Council's decisions and actions to date. The Final Assessment roll reflecting the total of those actions is attached as Exhibit "B". Martin J. De Haas, P.E. `51�,��4C+ ('u,- v President 1 \ w cc: 80.194.118 /W L REOON MJD/j t \ Y 14. %q�9(D� Attachments: Exhibit A - Final Assessment Map Exhibit B - Final Assessment Roll Exhibit C . Example of Assessment Method (Ident. 31) Exhibit D - Example of Assessment Method (Ident. 73) Exhibit E - Final Project Costs Exhibit F - Ordinances and Memorandum of Settlement Agreement F-1 - Ordinance 82.13 F•2 - Ordinance 82-23 F-3 - Ordinance 82-52 F-4 - Memorandum of Settlement Agreement F-5 - Ordinance 82-68 Ic Report 10 \\ FINAL ASSESSMENT MAP \\ LLD. 21 S.W. 72nd ANENLE AREA ___•�." ,\`.i STREET IMPROVEMENTS '• IW r �\ TIGARD.OREGON 1985 • d b \ • M A M r \\ � •f • � • ___ I • fr •_• ` � .n. � ..w � � www .. 1 • • o q r r • • •�� w 11 l�fl !.l11 • •• e v� • w, 1Z • • s \ _ 1• 17 r . � � • •wv. \\ r • I= v 1 ` w! ...sem • � • �•n 1 t1 f7► �. w � IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT •• _ �=-_-� SOtNVDARY 1 u. r r • r r w.. 1 `, r . �_ • � ri..w. 1 11 y • •' r r e .+ • 1 . y • 1 1 •t M � 1 1 • �•w 1 t \ W • w � w ...••a t w•w •• 1 �� fff • f..• "� � s• �wrw w w..u. •�.w 1 � • W • _ w 1 •w w � 1 • . .e.w• r.w r.w 1 • SU LE:1u+700• • _— �_ 1 • rte• � .w 1 � t • _ i 1 t y i 1 1 M \ 1 w _ • •w Zr 1 / W 1 a • • r r r `�i.• r• • \�IKtt IM►'rR►vGmu�f v .w. � 1 11GARD.OREGON '• °° eo t \\ DECEMBER,1985 1 • ::f]1 0 a \\ 1 • ♦ 1R v= = 1so � • w n r w ♦\ Ir 1= re = • or Sao • N H • N • ^:�+ • It 0ow 0.111 (. • r • +••.• • �. rr \ -t: w To •o 13 \` N TS \ e a n • rw� ♦ w. \ • . n ... ♦ u to \ • C 03 mb IMPROVEMENT DlThICT •• _ � _ —- Jf\WV\1 ,' \\ •T. PJtM M • y - �r��r er 1% \ ^• w rw• � Is W. 1 � 1 a • t i '! !• N � 1 � i '� � ate,.. � r.•rr 1 1 1 SCALE:1"=700 1 • � r ' « a t 1 1 ♦ t L.. .r r r 1N \ 1 I n \ 1 • / N \1 •• w /� • w • w.w�r. • I 1 •n� i wo w. nr•.•1w•.•.••1u• m x Y• wo�•u DD "1 Z W W 0 a. 0 � Z 0 CD W a :' ® .a c -- "� E W a� D c v 0 J v W Z U. C coi T: i•. .v � .� M P O• C H W • P m d 1N O: LULnr � v � N v O• � r _ v O N v M � v N N v W O v v v O IA W gFA L .. ON O N O _ M N A N aD 12 N O A N O` O K y r M M CO 10 A d 1Y IA Li g i W O) p O O O O O O aaOa V m W m W O • c o p o = N r �► W to { b A 8O O8 Opa SO O S Y 1-. • � •O O O +O •O O p t N S ��'• IA M O 1A A ^ N 6 r A O N ar $ z O 8 8 O O O S p p O O O O O O GA ta ix Gn W UN NA O M S A o N .O C4 O N �y r � S �p� y L CD 0 ad W ; Z i W Nxx O = fN( 1:J 7 3 O O Q L O 1.. O /0 y N �A ` M O V H {• m V m ffi co Y1 �L O O U7 ` � g 1p E � ppp E �ryy p �44v O it trpy 144� O 61 L A 4 L. .t 01 Y yLOy A .1c. A M•• {� r H Z O N Z Z W d r h V H O i M1 H t! r- W V. OCA go O r � N N L A N L. A N N H N N V1 a a J i rp O 0 w p r O 41 p .ppQ tll p O O f+ In ca cc tj CO O M 6. N M O• N N N M • N A N A N OC N N N0 !V N NO /V N N �.- W W v v USr s • r N N M � �t M1 .O A 4 t 0 W O v v v O N 6U s < 09 v Q M N •� � N M co CA. W •O ^ N N N , { • p f O g g $ O O ti O i_ W_ O O O O O O W O O A O R N cy = M � � N ♦O A K •OO N W { pp OO O QqO •a � O N N M r M1 C9 O 8 8 O 8 .- O O O O O O to ix tNq L N Y 4 • L •di V • A 6 ♦ y Y O Oa O. w d'36 � ♦ y a ~ P r O ♦+ A G �Y' O to L roC � p ` �Y' ^ V aIA q QO i 6 d i Y tJ G � L Qi � V � yid yQ16 � 0 U% i H N O CL v < COQ d w { d N Y D. v d d .r. O ' 4 N y O W N N L N Q V ~ r A Li sn CY As C%a N It N t J 1� y► 1 1� O N v OA N Wcn v v v i < U N N m v O pp.. M Fn ww .Cpq t0 a $ O P O 10 WN r W O r 49 M o p po O O •,p 8 O g O N O• O' O i_ O C2, O • C O P N .T 1� Iii M1 V .rp pp p p p g g O O 8 S g C; $ � N i Q p pOp O O g O O O O S ip O' O O O O O to • � i uk 10 A N VI � • N r oft WN < Y • ' L f • .Lr tl R4 • u M 'L. 'c P ~ obi:; a f V O~• i 6^ P N LWN a J u V N N r N P a A � � � d p, d 9 � v x < t x PC yy O O40 0 cc L 2 J P m N if G L. CD O A O .rL. O 01 L O Ot u N O L O �+ 7 LR N u m a S d O = OL w S r F 2G 6 ►- c J 't pN W N N N H VN O Oc rr G � • N r' N N H • r 71 _ .apD �Pp CM ol ` N W v v y y c p� v r - N 8 W N d O N N N r W M N W M O M �O H v N < • Q oo p p 8 8 8 8 8 v W V A W W A r M N _ N ti W N N N Q .p Y► tll � M N + 8 8 S 8 8 O 8 O r N fA s C K i M • O ag 4 d ffi CiP V O N V O N ^ {� M} W {� P W A P y �+ i x W p� P f1 r { in P �: yC G vt ac t P P x O O Cle N. r u. O Oi i It 4 s s d 6 40 � t0 N A d � G ►- � 6 r �.. d r- d f ^OQ ��OO N �•OO N ``OVVOOOO N •p N d V► N N IS � � r N N N N NI N N N d r fl � OO r N N N N N .O N fV k ) k K : do § § G ° § Ln § � } — ■ ! } 2 k a a § 8 § S ! ' C; ' . U. } ■_ 3. in ■ § ' an 9 § § § .. . � 1A . � � a 2 _ ■ a § 2 C } ■ © 2 co Im ■ f - § ° 7 is ■ ca o- ¢ a _ 2 e -i - § 2 ; _ 61s , a . } ) ; I § I Imo § 7 ) f I � § � \ dam tk < � a 2C � - § § � @ � s 2 � § § � � f ■ f § f § � . k k ■ ■ ~ � § CM > CY 2 k k ■ \ § � k . © ■ . ,�• J N A M P r A � N S� ypp o .t H A A N O 1•. N _ _ l0 O N W v v v s < � y Ir S i0 M P W! W . N •O •OO M ^ N •O •O �O � .p N < p p 49 = S S O O S O S O O O O O O O O . � V W O Io a A aY� W 4nW 1A N r H < • p p p p o • O S O S S S S S 3. N N r . O O O O O O O O t 1� Nyy 00- ��N •C M W 3 N I: - N M on O A N n • C _6 w • YOp1 N r �yY y O 3i u d J < M < N v m C < V M S • < •L P C r aCP. ru0 �q N i•• G 1� tlCl A O • u Y Q $ u N p P�( L Pyy W A P W OC Nd ^ IAC 43� A !yr•�. pP� i O E d b y yi N a Y Y O �O1 A y O O o L Mp p Y t� OC L •O P G O OI 4 .- L L Y C SII \ 4 W w3 Y •.' 7 q O 6 Ll 3 O u ^ O fA O •: a u. W � �-• u d i- u {a .- i- O .- .- IiY a a .. a- x o: � m ud m a Ln 40 en � NBM� < S N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LN L. O O W J N S N O N O N NON N N N IV N N N OP N !O N N WM p .app ,app O • O M M M M M M O N O v N W ry 0 LM C%l M v OO N � N r N � Al C; u O o W O y�yj�y N _� IIs N � N o• N 1` NN a O• r ' O O p $ O g T ® 8 $IA 8 8 � VC C4 M N V 4 y O •O V O C yy LG6 • O N M d 9 D P O 4 V •LOr ig O U. • � � O• � ~ t � " � r p � M _Cu Ci N O + K �D G ■ Yl t' O if1 u , (Oi 3 4 �UbYrr u -161 O OC OO. (C� ® V L C V Opy V O O L a • i 6 d O V P d O V v O O u 6 N O Z d N H N d Z 2 • tl L p^^ y 0 u 4i {„1 of ® i d N N a � W y N N N N y N N N USF ' a M 0. M Cl �► v ^ � P / N N YN1 rOD M � P E ... H � .f f•. M d � CD K U S 1� P a O W M • O O O S M a W N O N w 1, m v d W W N N N � N t • p p p V S O O S O C3, pp O S i_ W O O O O O O O O y W to A O� .f •O i` M O S C �O O � (� •O .,t M v N Y7 id O A ALa N N M N N 1� r M OM O N M 3 • O O O d O N i fOt M N N M N N V! W L yy J r r �i ^ q N N N Ce M M M d a V N Y udcLU M t Mry rl < M1 us r < e y atC$fc C- 0, A. S 9 o ^ ao : Im Z 7 t7 Z O Z Z yNt G y O p S p M b Y �I V Y r0 N p tA� 01 N L v N t, M y L _ Y1 L r H r H 99 6 a OL � O. Y Y1 O. ]t 1!1 O. ]L N D. H N N N La Ll O V O V O N d N N �' N O N O N O H N 126O a r z N M cm v< ... r v v %s ~p W D ta O r V• f N Ct y N b y t < CD C3. { Q O {{E( U C 42 y Z_ W C; yti�y p r \ �y W r M N N .p S O f fMV ti s_ N a N 6d M ti � O N r • r N 8 8 a • � r r � O f•. ilk ti O • �NNNp -- � W • '� N N y $ R M w a r < r M en tI1 N N 4 r oV} a M M y ` L .. 40 N don - pt 4WD K Z < y ca P r O 4 so 41 A S 44N u o Y u m « O p p o cm v� ►`- o o� ]L Wt d Y a < d N r N r r r p pN pQ qo r y ^ y N y r N N W K s N r N N N ►. IV W N G,i i r M yrs 1/1 N < Ny Vp N N t- o o N Ch t� • ^ k Lei B § § { wl ~ � . 2 ! � 2 . « : Co . � § [ $ q ■ s A § Ad - = m [ _ @ m ■ � { ■ � 8 a ■ c � 2 { § a 4 ( ac { § §in a � § { § : § go � I � . | � a a • $ { 0. fk { E ƒ � { § Ais f Q 9 4 *5I8 } 2 � f 7 § U; k § $ \ ) § 9L IL < § 0. � § CL < § � B \ § § § ■ § § V@ r — C :: � = 2 = LU § { a f § § § § § § f § § § § § > . k § ( ■ m I o � ) % C4 A. } I \ \ ; N § tj J ■ . ~ m v v cm N v y v v Luc O O y K4 Q N W v N A[ c V y \ M rn d �y IN N v V fN M y N _ • o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O S moo_ W O O O O O O O m0 W O M OM•• M O� V; H N r M N r NM1 N � � H 6 • yp O' V S v O M y pp �M+1 pom�pp _ a N M pW P p N P N r tl O � M r r N fn N to i � O• � O• � O N M W � N N •O �• •O •O < Y N •- N N N N O G N M �•• N N N M H V �/ ryaC► / / y/ / `/u'' • W •• Y Oa � Yr Pr0.: ` $�. v�+ aYe Pa NA r 41C O >`c s/ m L99O t<! •<� IC P .9 P 2. V Y h• N � Y E N yN • V « M p� = M V •.• Y p� Y •.- M M •� e• Y S O 4 7 3 IS y q w w U, O r. C N w w C y iL. + :p• C N r G N `+�O N �j e s a t o d = a o. < a d < d a c a • � J 1+5 p M o M � CO p � OC p .M.. Mt y� fA X y 0 N C N N N O N O g N ^ CA^ t O « < N N 6 1� 6 0 W J M t p N N N N N H N N N N N N N N N w ® J M N Iff in � N N N N J ►\- � C ~' N O a MMM My v v N r p N v v p N pW� w ui O ; m _ r � N r r z r W 47 N 3 p pp pp pp O $ Q O O O 7 OC; O O O I mF W P fR a0 C4 r N A W: ai gwz O N i P 0 r o g S 09A P P N N P nj r r„ r r p p oo 8 8 Q O O O P s 1n o d W Y L Z P M L ✓ MCZ N O a r o O r d 0 r 0. 6 B r d 6 « 6 d < r CL N qty 4a �p P O r r r r N N r N e N r N N • W !s ` ' N r N N K < > N d Mtt tt o M 8 �^ r N r r MM OO r W J r r O r M N r N N . N N N N N CM � W WN � w : § i Colo ■ & 2 In - : - _ § § % ( } S ( § B Go } - \ K { a a 2 \ § § C d i . ` Q % } \ § _ § � . ~ @ : { s $ a » s_ � I � 2 k K 44 § ) - § @ { 2 r § § k k . ■ � � � 2 me . a ■ a - ^ { Ul2 / 700 � 2 / } \ $ K ` ■ / J § ' § k § § to § k ` f ° } § 2 a _ ( e _ s 2 g I s s I e k 2 2 s Ull s ° ~ a § i ■ f § _ s _ ' ~ ) § ■ . % Q _ $ £ §id } / 4, \ ; -C - Q4c § § ' § 7 f $ A § § ' ~ *A ■ ~ in § § §_ § § § k 2 ? �\ k 2 � � ■ ■ . . m � ) § . a � ! . . . . . . . . . . . lm . G y N to44 $ ., V V m M M 2 N Ln v C N cm r N O N w t c 0 g $ o c o 0 0 U UA O C3 N V!yy� M� P M M It C M Z P M r4- O � N wV YI po JJ w S tl a � at km C4 N p pp O .moi.. { S O O y�y N CY $ g g i A WN wM s w CAA • N M w J N on 481 Lp Y ` L s dd a 7F Cb X tJ r Q m M ' > 2 Y Y w O w r w w 3 �+ P w 9 �` P N ~ N P O O O a+ G M O y q O N d 0 y u LL v i Y 7 y N 11//11 qq O 4 w q CC IL 0. f:l G _��O ... O O c Y _ CCu EN t d C Y N m O > r CC 7 9y S .0 "i •►• Z 6 w i •r M iXL .} ✓ �' L r O w L Y 0 p j � O O O , s •. •O d L a � MpiYs1 c N r M A �S= p lel N G Z d N to M 6 w v.. O N N N us J• r ^ N in N I N w N N N M N r MM _ Ccm p .. ZJ N W N IMM► ppp, M �D 1..lpp� O� r � �_ P P f� M � OD •O WO v v N N O W W v `/ • v M O• YOi O 1� � K cc H 2 P 4f1 A M W a v O •O N a N • 6 W r N r r N M (A i • p p pp p p p pp i O O O O O S O V trl O O O O O O O S S QyQ W m W W • N N O • 1~ICX�yyy r .f �IMy� .Mp A_ O YIn N IA O R W v r r W N H i • OQ p p O pO • O O O O Q S O M� A A .f O •O �1 P to H r .Mt li pr RV _� $ O S g S $ O O O O O O O i H N N W Ha N O 1.1c M H J i � r Y C C O M W 77i O V! Y M O M O p N OL 9 N 41 ` Nry V Nry U N K M M w t N M Y M O V O• W 1� � O, a y M m p C Q I'llW Q P Q C P y P! tl 0 O i C o 7 L N o ( V M p GG p• m p� _� C G p� i OD ►� N C y M L. CA 4 N J > !i 66 10 Y Z' IO OOo Y m 000 M Nt fA W r r Y i •+ YY1 1M �+ O �0 y1 pp. Y CD � LE �7 pMp �A � b O! •O _ N d C[ r d OC O. d OL d b i13 Z •O F- d v N f0i N v •O H 47 ••00 r 2 M0 C3, 3 w N N cc C p OO N po N w M MNrN N N A P- i Q Q 6 6 �•OOO A x N N IA N Y1 y v N M x N N �..�•-� � N N N N N i UN � � § § - uz � . B LLA § { g » a C9 } k k ' k k § : cm k 2 : C; 4 Q Q d - . L6 § : . ■ � ) a a 8 s a a a 2 § ) § B k B k § § § § ] \ inol CD 9 2 a 0 o a d § d ) R U% CIL § » . � U; LLj ma � a k $ 2 Q 2 a- e I e n - } a { e ] e a E 2 k k E S § 7 § ( ) \ \ -9 = / \ 1 39 fA.- 43 IC \ \ \ fB � 2 § § § s_ 7 2 2 a ) 2 - : 7 k § § _ k - » - 2 § k - a k $ a � _ _ § _ z a ■ - § ■ _ § § sm § § § » ; = t = - - � _ § = e _ - § 22 � ■ ■ � . ■ ® ■ ■ k ■ \ \ 2 § / § as § a § § $ 8 k § . _ m � � � ~ C � : � § § a � � ■ : k � § B \ .. _ ■ : B § 2 m # � § l6n ■ m ® « : § { ® . ( a ■ a _ § . � § 4 { s a a 8 a § a k ( 8 K e § . , 9 § ( C; . U § ) § § { _K § § § 2 2 K § k § k §I- B � § _ Ob 0 Q B ( § I & $ § a ION { � a e � a e � � 2 e 2 � _ I � ■ s � � � s k � � � 44 _ 2 ; ( § § 9 k k \ § I § & { c _ in � � 7 ■ . ° $ § § f § da § fm | . § § { K § § 2 2 a c § ■ - \ § � � } 2 . 2 � a � . ■ a . | — � § § MIA 2 k � \\ B § § ) � § � _ _ rn ? ■ � . \ 2 § \ UJ ! q q \ � 9 | § E q / . ■ [ e & \ Us : ■ } f . a s a \ - k B ) \ § § { in U K ■ § : ■ - § \ ■ .c C ■ � © - ■ � 2 � § E § § \ § 246. 2 3 2 © 3 2 I } : � � a � � � � 2 � 2 ■ � §C6 I-- | . \21 � US \ \ � � \ s ■ . � Q § § & { { $ C rn ■ fCD { 8 C; o . \ \\ e_ g i © � - a { } § k � § ) B B ; § § k k K \ » : § � . a � � § � ■ E " k usc - - 2 ` » @ I L. Q « ui \ § k { fA~ U I } s 2LU [ 2 2 $ § e f ■ Z C, � asu; k ) / : 2 LA � 2 . ® WN Ln a } \ } k k k § 2 § k f § § Q I _j Cs z A A §d CK § I § K [ r4m } \ k2 } C WN $ \\ :. . . . . § § k \ _ us _ § : _ k § § a a § ■ m or ■ } s C3, C2, i \ © ' s § Ct P / 19 PM = 2 � - � / § ■ Fn C3, © ° � § � : ■ 2 � .0 10 © ■ g < s � � � � - e � � $ s % 7 2 s \ � \ � k e I e � � � � $ � . $ / � - f ■ � � S % c in 2 k § I $ § i7 i2 k fI 0. 2 § � . § _ $ $ § $ § ■ { k FA � / I § \ ~ 0. § 2fA co j pnM C4 pm CM �. . . > - «& . +w � . r. .. �• o N N ^ N N J N W HM1 N 1 Y cQ Iy 0 M_ v A O a a O 2L ~ N v �•• U• r v � v v v v W O v O YI W Y N N N d N N N < p p p p p S O O O O O S S uRei O O O O O O O O a a W m W O • M�y .} .p • If N iV d Al O O r a M N a0 P M r r r N W b < • �g p p p p p O O O O S O O N N C%J pp N •"' to U M r N CD UN < a g $ M N � O < � r K O QL m3 < N • C • Lp j ~yL! B ~�, Q K ti L •Y.r fMV J O p� M ` 099a� ii a -a t! •rIA T u q •- L r O W J m , 4 W M Y W M O p tN. ap V O O M CO = 3 > � 2 S p �Mi Qp1 •� N QY1 L t qii W GL 3 $ « S L t o a, Y W C L i N ^L y� iy 'O 7 Y OYI L1• p O �+ a+ y o ILtl Y Y ~ •- p �p • $ r a ~ O d y A u 7 O OL r < S J in 1- < S J W A J 7 � a d 3 b r an d •B f� x v •n d 0 0 im Cg O $ ! 6 M ^ O M ib fJt O K i N •+ N r v N r s N M v N H Nl N d r O O O O d d d d OW S P C3 C N N � ? N ^ O NC%l ~ N ~ NN o ` L L O O d d r $ Z • a P yaj � O p N N 1OA W H N Fpp• �Ny v v v i N N N A N < • p p p p us 44 V U O O O O O O i a a Wto ac W W O ��pp oo r a% W O O g S N A p uu 4 L W d K to • J E J {t 1q1 y M �t M V V V @ V {'J 4 Y •a h ' _ � u � v Lp IV u P Li 9Y til m Y m O y yyyry�� s V M V M P. V, ~ J Y •C_ N w S M y L r Q O L pp pp p» CC t � •� 6 N O a d < r0 d < 00 J m y fV y N 3 � J 6 N 0. � < � 6 ►. U W O 0 N � ,O ul19IL : o 208 oog mg J z C p 9 O r � ^ r O ' y � N 9t N }Wy ` N ` N N M *'` ~ 0 _ r Im x O O O r M v v v v H W O Q` • Q Nus 1 W< t�.f M p ^ O N i0 O • « 40 N < • p p p p Q Op U O O O O O O O Z 21 W e W W d �p ti • O Cl! r N N r W W VYIt pP, p. pp,, ..pp ON. i 3-- y U\ap N PNp r < • !3 � O dry O o U1 4 N r r r g r v C. ~ tm r O O ifl M N fn • `p M r M r • � 4 00 L. a r N L O tll rL V V J < V W � r G y OL . L < O • a V Y qM Q L A OC v M J L O fV LO O !� C" w > O M 1� 7 OOJ N M a < P ��y O• N N p. coW ca am fA to S V yC z at L 8 Y u O Y _VG IPS V g L r o sC3, y n. �= s d d .G GO. c7 /�i a° ucm D° r F < ® J n. m O m O O o S Ca Cp pO N •^ P W }L N P N M y YJ N N Y N Y dQ L L L r- a aw a° M 1033 Cr I X 7IC 'y r' N OL N r N r N N N OC N M N s. r r , q UA 7 k d § K � y ■ (A ® a . � ■ \ on k } � � ■ Colo, % < _ C2 _ - , § § \ 0 ~ § § k 2 � } In _ . 2 2 Ub - 2 a ESA k . � f % f m \ co § a k ■ & § _ e a e _ � - Acs � :3; ( I 2 © ®- 2 k a © § k - } $ ) 0 � kf AK } kk } § F96 _ )§ a §§ t L. ) \ § C � " k \ I L. _ [ _ . \ , § 2 k s � 40 m /_ ^ . o : © . / \ k § ' us . � . Cca 4 ~ \ EXAMPLE OF ASSESSMENT METHOD "• _ • \`�' FAG TOR5: Frontage_e a,ea Facto- ! 289.256 66 : 110..0 7 9 12 5 700 9 7151 r' •• �, M •. 3,655,G6000s�ft • r `� Fran toge len gthFactor1 299.156 66 = 119.2787715SO01ft 11,733.39 ft Total area Factor 1 758,321.44-_ 9 10.048459Z026,51ft. l5,648,657.00$1.ft. • • w » w w0177165127 R ght of Waw Facto 1 Z36,.-340 50 f 76 n 4 Fionta f > �I e a N Area /DENT 31 n w ® Total . ■ Area au r 11 •"� y•,,, '• i .._ sou ,�•• ^"' •' ..r• (FranteQt lite SeptM1 UPROVEMENT DISTRICT SCALE 1"-200' •M w F/NAL 1155ES5MENT . Y w - Basic Assessment w • , w, � .( Fronto a Area Cost (26,550 sf ft)(t0 0791Z57o0971sg f1J•f 1,100.79 Frontage Length Cost a (IZ7 feet)(113.278771.5B001ft) 68640 Total Area Cast (.93,Z 53 s ft)(10 0484592026/54 ft)• 4,51.9 06 , $6,306-25 SCALE,V*9800' ; °� • , Right-of-War Assessment .. ($8,,306.,Z5)(0 1'77165127) - 1,471.58 r 1 , Special ssessment ' r i 0.00 i 1 tal Final Assessment 1 9,777.83 To Less PteliminarY A55essment (11,55882) . Net Assessment- Additional or (Credit) (i!•7B0.99) w r �1 I .1. i i3►SStSSMEiUT M`THOD FACTORS Fronfo4e area Factor 1 289,256 66 .3O,07y1Z57009T,1sf f' �• .3655,660 00 sf ft. m + • O p \ • v. •. « « • ++\�\ From tone /en th rat for S 29256,66 9 25 ,66 -113.-17977159001 t f --- = « « "• r0„ Total area Factor S 758.32/.41 r f 0.048459ZO261s4 ft. 0 „ •n •i111 « « R,ght-of-Wae Factor $236,8!050 = 0/77/65/17 n S 1,336,834.76 w n .• r w • � W Q n a • � x c nr n « n 0 Area !DENT 31 r t 3 a ® Total ^ Area w ++'' •"! •.,ti A loo' nw•-.tr , ', - -(frenflgl NCJ dCPth1 -T-7 iMpR0VEWENT DISTRICT SCALE'1"=200' BOUNDARY « • 4L A55E55MENT .. Bape 455essment % r + .,• FLon to'ge Area Cost (26,5503f ft)(/0079/25log 97fsp it)wl2,1oa79 e A Frontafe Length Gost •" (IZ7 feet)(113.278771500011t) 1,68640 Total .4/ea CO5t' (93,255 sf ft)(!0 0484592OZ61sl.ft)• 4,512,06 , 3 8,306,25 SCALE-I"5840' R� ht-of-Wo Assessmen .. (58,306.25)(01771651Z7) 1,471.58 , « 1 Special SSCSSmenf • 000 , T' i w + Total Final sessment 19,177.03 As 1 Less Preliminary Assessment (lI5588Z) I 10' Neff Assessment- Addi trona! or (Credit) ( ) « •1 r• N ayyee!4 `m x s 04Ti DeCenlbC/,/905 sa[ Oo.I NA DeNAAS&ASSOCIATES,INC• CCW4SULTWG ENGWEE RS A SUMMYORS aw.r-wo eww nm�avav Nr f w er•.N•e.«• waw•.« EXAMPLE OF ASSESSMENT METHOD FAL TORS Fronfoge area Factor a' 207,256 eb . 10 079/15700971.sf ft 655,660 00 m a •• �`♦ From fage length Facfor S 289.256 66 =j 13.27,f 771fg-10115t r Total area Factor f 758.32/ 44 .657Od s!ft. 004B4591026fs1 ft. " ..r ;•..n „ Rjght-of-Way Factor 1136,84050 . 0/7745/17 S/,336,834.7,6 r n r w w � n `♦, r��r Fionto9e n Areo • Tota/ F11D73 Area r • 1 A• vAPRpVEMENT DISTRICT •• _ •r 801 MARY n. r SCALE-1"=200' r r FINAL ASSESSMENT r � � ', +� Basic Assessment \ r. From no ge Area Cost a { `•• (riayrtjj%vJ%77E37GJ57�tYfd) �� 7.00 r Frontage Length Cost (O feed fl 13.27877/5800111) • 0.00 i� Total Area Lost 1 (217,800 s9.ft)(tO D48459Z0261SI ft)' 10,544414 SCALE I"=8o0' , ' 1/0,544.4/4 r Rioter-of-Wov Assessment (110,544,414)(01771,6512-1) /,869.894 '• a' SeeeiOl 55essmen , 0.00 Tocol Fino/ Assessment ;12,424.29 r « ♦ r r •• ♦; Prelimina/y Assessment' (I4,886.82) r Net Assessment-Additional of (Credit) (2,462.53) ASSESSMENT METHOD FAL TORS Fiore take area FOLfa/ ie 2d9.156.66 . 10.p79/2570097)s f ft A m m .w . ,4,653,660.00 sf ft Fronfa�e /tog ffr Factor' ! 189.25,1 66 .113.27977/59001fr. 21,783 39/t r. (.,. J Total area Factor 1 756_?2! 44 646.65700 s1 ft. _#OO4B4S920161sf fr- • • o r r • •.• �.�„ Riyhf of WaY Factor !136.94050 • 0,177/65/27 „ $1,336,834.76 w r w A. p n n • • w n � • n Fran rage �` grea n • ® ToralY/Parea1 Ci4PF20NEtFJT DSSTRfCT •• $ -�� _._-- BOltA4RY ^� '• SCALE-1"Z200' AA r FINAL ASSESSMENT � r ; ' M A. Basic .45ses5menr r• �` F/oro a Areo Gost ;y \ \w "' (Jay rt)j%J J7ii23t+3uY7�ay ii) - QGJ t� 4 r \ Y. Fronnue LenOL Lost ;� •i i� (0 fee r)(S/3.2787715B001f1) A. 0.00 Tota/ Area Cost (117,900 si.fr.)(J(0 048459ZOZ61sf ft)r 10,544-414 SCALE,1"•e00' , • 110,544-414 Ri$Lhr-of-Way ASsessmenr -• f:�- , (//0,544 414)(0/77165117) ' 1,869874 ' r r r' �gecial Assessment 000 , r ! `♦ 1 • ~' « �� Toral FinalAssessment 91Z,4Z4.19 14,896.92 Less Preliminary Assessment ( ) , Y w , , , Net Assessment- Additional of (Credit) (12,462.53) Y 1" M r. S M m x x CD DATE.0ecemAer,/96s ME-dG 04.Its ®&HAAS i ASSOCIATES,INC. C7OCNSMTM BOMEE S A S AVEYMS w.i.-•noo c— ._gxah Yta,fo w••w c...•w•c..o - •n oe••r j as L.I.D. NO 21 72nd AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FINAL COSTS 1. BASIC PROJECT It. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 1. BASIC PROJECT A. jenttruction 1. Work by Columbia Excavating, Inc. 41,661,851.70 Less work by Columbia Excavating, Inc. which is not part of the "Cap" consideration. a. De Haas cost CR-R. Xing) (8,993.70) b. Washington Co. (San. Sewer) (9.284.00) _ c. Pae Trust (San. Sewer) (4,012.90) d. SPIOCO (Sen. Sewer) (10,407.80) e. City of Tigard (San Sewer) (10,300.00) f. Pac.Trust (Aprons, etc.) (4,108.65) g. T.R.F.D. (OPTICOM SIGNAL EQUIP.) _ (17,500.00) 51,597,244.65 2. Work by City Forces a. interim striping during Winter, 300.00 1982 3. Work by Southern Pacific Transportation Co. a. SXF1239 (Main Track) 57,196.69 b. SXF1240 (Spur Track) 23.234.99 80,431.68 6 1 k _t 4. Work by Oregon State Highway Division a. Inspection, striping and signal revisions 6,266.50 b. Signal Testing 4,482.50 e. Signa! Programs 1,650.00 12,399.00 5. Work by Carver Equip. 8 Excavating Co., Inc. a. Lowering Lake Grove Water District's 12" waterline at Durham Road and Upper Boones Ferry Road 4,188.05 6. Work by Tigard Water District a. Place rock at Bonita Road 432.00 7. Miscellaneous a. Removal of Connie's Market 2,100.00 b. Adjust wetarmeter on OSHD R/W along Durham Road 402.50 2.502.50 Total Construction: $1,697,497.88 B. LEGAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND ENGINEERING 1. General Legal a. I.C.C. costs and disbursements $19,729.44 b. City Attorney Current $9,095.13 Projected (after 12/1/85) 500.00 9.595.13 $29,324.57 2. City Administration a. Interim Financing until Pre-Assess. (Const. only) 10,565.55 b. Finance (1/2% of Const. Costs) 8,487.49 c. Clerical (1/4% of Const. Costs) 4,243.74 d. Administration (1/2% of Const. Costs) 8,487.49 e. Closing Costs (1-1/2% of Const. Costs) 25,462.47 57,246.74 Costs - 2 3. Engineering Current (12/1/85) 337,910.78 Projected 2.500.00 340,410.78 Less individually assigned engineering costs which are not a part of the "Cap" consideration. a. Washington Co. (San. Sewer) (1,475.20) b. Pac Trust (San. :.ewer) (944.22) c. SPIDCO (San. Sewer) (3,019.88) d. City of Tigard (San. Sewer) (1,888.31) • e. Pae Trust (Aprons, etc.) (616.30) f. T.R.f.D. (OPTICOM SIGNAL) (2.625.00) 329.841.87 Total L.A. S E: 416.413.18 TOTAL BASIC PROJECT COSTS: 52,113,911.06 11. RIGHT-Of-WAY ACOUISITION A. Purchases 1. Negotiated Settlement 4160,604.47 2. Condemnation a. Maksym (Ident. 8) 1) Settlement (6,530.00 2) Engineering 2,518.42 3) Appraisal 5,003.29 4) Attorney 21,095.27 5) Mise. (Council) 2.000.00 $37,146.98 b. Killian (Ident. 46) 1) Settlement 11,800.00 2) Engineering 600.54 3) Appraisal 450.00 4) Attorney 8,573.10 5) Miscellaneous 0.00 21,423.64 Costs - 3 e. Whitlatch (Ident. 29) 1) Settlement 15,000.00 2) Engineering 2,460.20 3) Appraisal 150.00 4) Attorney 8,726.17 5) MISC. (Apron 8 curb removal by City) 577.50 26,913.87 d. Gage (Went. 9) 1) Settlement 5,000.00 2) Engineering 10.84 3) Appraisal 0.00 4) Attorney 2,353.66 5) Misceltaneous 0.00 7,364.50 92,848.99 3. Permit Cost for storm drain across B.N.R.R. track on Durham Road (1st 10 years) 200,00 Total Purchases: 5253,653.46 8. L,gndscaoing and Sion Relocation 13,480.64 C. legal. Adminfstrative i Engineering (Other than Condemnation Costs) 1. Title Report Costs 2,405.00 2. Appraiser Coats 11,961.00 3. Right-of-Way Agent Costs 10,287.50 4. Engineering Costs (Gen. Management, legat Descriptions, Map Preparation, Negotiations r: and Acquisitions) 68,529.04 5. legal Costs (See Item A.2., Condemnation) 0.00 Costs - 4 6. City Administration, based on costs of negotiated settlement 8 settlements on eondewwtions ($198,934.47) a. Interim Financing 0.00 b. Finance 0/2%) 994.67 c. Clerical (1/4%) 497.34 d. Administration 0/2%) 994.67 e. Closing Costs (1-1/2%) 2.984.02 !' 5.470.70 98.653.24 Total L.A. 8 E: TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION COSTS: $365,787.34 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS: (For "Cap" Consideration) ` 1. BASIC PROJECT $2,113,911.06 1I. R/11 ACQUISITION 365.787.34 $2,479,698.40 Costs - 5 �j MORMONISM } i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �. ORDINANCE NO. 82-t_ AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JANUARY 12, 1981 AND MARCH 8 , 1982 , WITH RESPECT TO S. W. 72ND AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT; APPROVING, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND •ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING RESULTS OF HEARINGS HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, a resolution was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Tigard -at its regular meeting of March 8, 1982 , a copy whereof is hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full, by the terms of which the boundaries of a proposed street improvement assessment district were described, and the Council declared its intention to construct street improvements and to assess the costs thereof against the property within the boundaries specifically benefitted; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously declared its intention to make these improvements by Resolution No. 81-2, and WHEREAS, by the terms of said Resolution No. 81-2 hearings were duly called to be held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. -Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on February 9 , 1981 , at the hour of 8: 00 p.m. for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any parties aggrieved by the proposal to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvements; and on March 23, 1981 , at the hour of 8: 00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing new evidence; and on June 1 , 1981 , at the hour of 8:00 p.m. for the purposes of hearing additional evidence and - determining the scope of the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution No. 81-2 , due and legal notices of said hearings were given by publication in the Tigard Times for consecutive publishings on January 21 and January 28 , March 11 and March 18 , and May 21 and May 28 , 1981 , prior to said hearings; and WHEREAS, said hearings were duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on February 9, March 23 and June 1 , 1981 , at the .hour of 8:00 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, by the terms of said Resolution No. 81-2 and publication, -written objections or remonstrances from the owners of now less than 66-2/32 of the property within the boundaries of said area were Cinvited, and all objections and remonstrances as thus presented prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of less than 66-2/3% of the property in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the percentage of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of said improvements; and EXHIBIT F, ORDINANCE NO. 82- r3 Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 81-45 ordering the improvements and calling for bids, and amending Resolution No. 81-2 to establish a limit on the amount of the improvements assessable and providing alternatives for construction of the improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 81-82 amending Ordinance No. 81-45 and setting the improved street width; and WHEREAS, the City Council has indicated by motion that it finds Alternative A of Ordinance No. 81-45 , as amended by Ordinance No. 81-82, necessary for proper improvement of the street; and WHEREAS, Western International Properties wants the improvement extended to include Western International Properties Oregon Tech Center, the total cost of which extension will be assessed to Western International Properties Oregon Tech Center; and WHEREAS, the City has received favorable bids for the construc- tion of the proposed improvements, as amended; and WHEREAS, by the terms of Resolution No. 82-22 a hearing was duly called to be held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on March 29, 1982, at the hour of 8: 00 P.M. for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any parties aggrieved by the amended proposal for the construction of 72nd Avenue Area street improvements, including the Western International Properties Oregon Tech Center, to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said resolution, due and legal notices of said hearings were given by publication in the Tigard Times for consecutive publishings on March 18 and March 25 , 1982, prior to said hearing; and WHEREAS, said hearing was duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on March 29 , 1982 at the hour of 8: 00 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, by the terms of Resolution No. 82-22 and publication, written objections or remonstrances from the owners of not less than 66-2/3% of the property within the boundaries of said area were invited, and all objections and remonstrances as thus presented prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of less than 66-2/3% of the property in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the percentage of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of said improvements; and WHEREAS, the plans and specification were on file with the City Clerk as required by Tigard DIunicipal Code 13-04 .030; and • WHEREAS, all proceedings to date have been in conformity with 223. 387 and 223. 389 Oregon Revised Statutes and Tigard Municipal Code -' - Title 13 , of the City of Tigard, and all procedures were regularly and lawfully conducted; ORDINANCE NO. 82- 13 nage 2 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That all matters set forth in Resolution No. 81-2 of the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, on January 12, 1981, as amended by Ordinance Nos. 81-45 and 81-82 , and all matters set forth in Resolution No. 82-22 of the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon on March 8 , 1982 , copies whereof are hereto attached marked Exhibit 111" and by reference herein made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full, be, and the same are, hereby approved, ratified and confirmed, and the boundaries of the area known as S. W. 72nd Avenue Area Street Improvement District as heretofore described in Resolution 82-22, be, and the same are, hereby declared and fixed in accordance with said descriptions. Section 2: That improvements to the basic city standard 40 foot width curb to curb be made as follows: a. S.W. 72nd Avenue from the south city limit line northerly along S.W. 72nd Avenue to S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road. b. S.W. 72nd Avenue from S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive) northerly along S.W. 72nd Avenue to just north of the S.W. Varnes Road running east of S.W. 72nd Avenue. C. S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road, from a point just south of S.W. Durham Road, northerly along S .W. Upper Boones Ferry Road to that portion already improved by the Oregon State Highway Division (Carmen Drive) . d. S.W. Bonita Road matching the existing improvements at I-5 and continuing westerly through the S .W. 72nd Avenue intersection. That improvements to the basic city standard 34 foot width curb to curb be made as follows: a. S.W. Tech Center Drive from S .W. 72nd Avenue westerly to the existing improvement. Section 3: Property owner participation shall be limited, exclusive of right-of-way costs exceeding $50 , 000 , to $1 . 3 to $1 . 5 million, except that Western International Properties shall be assessed an additional $33,955 for improvements adjacent to their property. Section 4 : That the City Council of the City of Tigard, having acquired jurisdiction to order the improvements to be -made, does hereby authorize and direct the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of the S.W. 72nd Avenue Area Street Improvement District in conformity in all reasonable particulars with the plans and specifications by Resolution No. 81-2 , as amended, and Resolution No. 82-22 adopted and hereby ratified and confirmed. ORDINANCE NO. 82= /3 Page 3 of 4 Section 5: That all lands situated within the boundaries described on EXHIBIT "A" of heretofore described ordinances and resolutions are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment district and, it is further declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefitted by said improvements, and that the total estimated cost . of the project is $2,050,455, and that the assessable cost, not to exceed $1,533,955, exclusive of right-of-way costs exceeding $50 ,000, shall be assessed in full, according to benefit, against all lands within said improvement district. Section 6: The Tigard City Council finds that the S.W. 72nd Avenue Area Local Improvement District improvements are of the character described in ORS 223.205, and that they therefore qualify for financing by general obligation improvement warrants pursuant to ORS 287.502 - 287. 510. Section 7: General obligation improvement warrants for the S.W. 72nd Avenue Area Local Improvement District are hereby authorized to be issued in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000. The warrants shall bear interest at the lowest rate that the City can borrow on the date of issuance and shall constitute a general obli- gation of the City of Tigard that shall mature on or before two years after the date of issue, but not later than June 1 , 1984. Warrants shall be retired as funds are received in accordance with ORS 287.506. Section 8: The Mayor and City Recorder are hereby authorized to execute the described warrants on behalf of the City of Tigard. Section 9: That inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the said improvements be constructed with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and signature by the Mayor. PASSED: By the Council, by vote of all Council members present, after being read two times by number and title only, this 29th day of March, 1982 . Recorded • APPROVED: By the Mayor, this p.- day of t /�cct1-c�i 1982. / Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 82- /3 Page 4 of 4 : E CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION No. DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHI14 AN AREA DETERXINED TO BE A STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SOUT1fl4EST 72nd AVENUE AREA L.I.D. No. 21; DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST THEREOF: DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND ASSESSED: APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF TtIE CITY'S ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted a petition requesting street improvements and has ordered preparation of a preliminary engineering report, pursuant thereto, at the Council's regular meeting of May 19, 1980, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council finds it _xpedient and necessary to order the improvement of the hereinbelow described lands by construction of street facilities and. appurentances thereto, and pursuant thereto the City's Engineer has submitted to the Council plans, specifications and estimates for the worts to be done and the probable cost thereof together with a statement of the lots, parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefited and the apportionment of the total cost of the improvements which each of said lots, parts if lots and parcels of land sharl be assei ;ed on account of the benefits derived; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said plans, specifications and estimates are satisfactory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD as follows: (a) That the City Council does hereby deem it expedient and necessary, and does hereby declare its intention to improve the aforesaid Southwest 72nd Avenue Area by construction of street facilities and appurtenances thereto. (b) That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the attached "EXHIBIT A" are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment district, to be known as "Southwest 72nd Avenue Area", and it is furtfier declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefited by said improvements, and that the total estimated assessable cost of $2,718,026.12 for said improvements, shall be assessed in full, on-a combination front foot—area basis against all lands within said improvement district. (c) That the plans, specifications and estimates with respect to the street improvements as submitted by the City's engineers be, and the same are hereby, aaopted and ordered to be maintained on file by the City Recorder for public inspection. (d) That Monday, the 9th day of February, 1981, at the hour of 8:00 F.11. , at .oiler Junior High School Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Tigard, Oregon,g g be, and the same are hereby set as the time and place for hearing and considering objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvement by any parties aggrieved thereby. RESOLUTION: No. 81 - {e} That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby, directed to give notice by causing to have this resolution published in the Tigard Times, issues of January 21, 1981 and January 28, 1981. PASSED: By Council on this _,(,l day of � 1L2,�T 1981. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: Recorder - City of Tigar k i a- 1 r Page 2 RESOLUTION No 81 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF L.I.D. Beginning at the northwest corner of T.L. 701 , 2SllD3; thence S 0°4' W along the westerly line of T.L. 701 122 feet to the northerly right of way of Yarns Street (a 50 foot right of way); thence southwesterly -approximately 51 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 710, 2SllDB located on the southerly right of way line of Varns Street; thence S 0°09' E along the -West line of T.L. 710 143.28 feet; thence S 89°05' W along the North line of T.L. 800, 2S110B to a point which is 290 feet (perpendicular distance) from the westerly right of way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence southerly appro ;i -iately 355 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 100, 2Sl1DC, which is located-on--the easterly -right of way line of 74th Avenue (a 40 foot right.of way); thence_ southerly along the easterly right of way line of 74th Avenue approximately 756 feet; thence N 88°48' W across 74th Avenue and al-ong the northerly line of T.L. 800, 2SllDC 820.57 feet to the southerly corner of T.L. 2000, 2S1lDC; thence N 41°51 ' W 251 .38 feet to the northiesteriy- corner of T.L. 800; thence southerly along the West line of T.L. 800 approximately 440 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way) ; thence southeasterly along said right of way line approximately 2000 feet to the southwest corner of T.L. 402, 2Sll2A; thence -East along the South line of T.L. 402 approximately 400 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 501 , 2S112A; thence S 0°09' W 326.2 feet along the West line of T.L. 501 and its southerly extension to the northerly right of way line of Bonita Road (a 40 foot right of way) ; thence southwesterly approximately 50 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 1900, 2S112A; thence S 0°39' E approximately 380 feet to the southwest corner of T.L. 1900; thence S 55°55'38" W along the northerly line of T.L. 1902, 2S112A 163.11 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way) ; thence southeasterly along said right of way line approximately 1000 feet to a point on the northerly line extended of T.L. 400, 2S112OB; thence S 88°14'07" W along said northerly line approximately 458.9 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 400, said point (_,'being on the easterly right of way line of the Oregon Electric Railway; thence southerly along said right of way line approx.innately 2255 feet to the southwest MEMMMMM f r corner of T.L. 200, 2Sll2DC; thence N 88°29'35" E 316.61 feet to the southeast L corner of T.L. 200; thence S 00°02'40" E 253.15 feet to a point on the West ce S 89°46'10" W along the North line of T.L. 1900, line of T.L. 2102, 2S112D; then 2S112D approximately 380 feet to the easterly right of way line of the Oregon . esterly 163.8 feet to the northerly right of way Electric Railway; thence southvr of Fanno Creek Place (a 40 foot right of way); thence southwesterly approximately 41 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 1301 , 2S113A; thence southwesterly t approximately 480 feet along the West line of T.L. 1301 and T.L. 1200, 2S113A to 4 the southwest corner of T.L. 1200, said point being on the northerly right of way E line of Durham Road (a 60 foot right of way) ; thence S 29°52' W 60 feet to the southerly right of way of Durham Road; thence southeasterly along said southerly right of way approximately 245 feet to the northerly right of way of Upper Boones Ferry Road (a 60 foot right of way); thence S 48017' W along said northerly right rry Road approximately 165 feet; thence S of xray line of Upper Boones Fe41°43' E int on the West line of T.L'-: 1100, 2Sll3A; thence approximately 284 feet to a po South along the West line of T.L. 1100 approximately 230 feet; 'hence %•lest along the Borth line of T.L. 2100, 2S113A approximately 185 feet; thence South along a hest line of T.L. 2100 243 feet; thence Hest along a North line of T.L. 2100 120 feet; thence South along a West line of T.L. 2100 100 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 50 feet; thence South along a hest line of T.L. 2100 383 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2700 approximately f 190 feet; thence South along a West line of T.L. 2100 297 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 approximately 146.67 feet; thence South along a West line of T.L. 2100 297 feet; thence easterly along the South lines of Tax Lots 2100 and 2101 , 2S113A and their extensions 1020 feet to the blest right of way line of Interstate 5 (I-5) ; thence northerly along the westerly right of way line of Interstate 5 (I-5) approximately 2390 feet to the southerly right of way line of Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way); thence northwesterly along said southerly right of way line approximately 1160 feet to the northerly right of way of Upper Boones Ferry Road; thence northeasterly along the northerly right of way line of Upper Boones Ferry Road approximately 660 feet to the westerly right of way of Interstate 5 (I-5) ; thence northerly and northwesterly � along the westerly line of Interstate 5 (1-5) and southeasterly right of way line of State Highway No. 217 (Beaverton-Tigard tlighway) approximately 7560 feet to y way); thence the easterly right of way line of 72nd Avenue (a 105 foot right of wa -2- f f. southerly along said easterly line approximately 45 feet; thence westerly _approximately 105 feet to the northeast corner of T.L. 701 , 2S110B; thence S 89°05' W along the Horth line of T.L. 701 100.98 feet to the point of -beginning. r' `' l � CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 81- 45' A_`4"OSU1N.%NCE CONFIRt.ING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JANUARY 12, 1951, WITH RESPECT TO S.W. 72ND AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: APPROVING, R::TIFYIN'G AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREE'r It•'''ROVEtIENTS, AS MODIFIED BY THE MOTIO-N ADOPTI::G THIS ORDINANCE; DECLARING RESULTS OF HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; DIRECTING SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ` WHEREAS, a resolution was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Tigard at its regular meeting of January 12, 1981, a copy whereof is hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth here- in in full, by the terms of which the boundaries of a proposed street improvement assessment district were described, and the Council declared its intention to construct street improvements and to assess the costs thereof against the property within the boundaries specially benefitted; and WHEREAS, by the terms of said resolution hearings were duly called to be held in Fowler Junior High School at 10365 SW Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on February 9, 1981, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any parties aggrieved by the proposal to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvement; and on March 23, 1981, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of hearing r evidence; and on June 1, 1981 at the hour of 8:00 p.m. for the purposes of hearing additional evidence and determining the scope of the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said resolution, due and legal notices of said hearings were given by publication in the Tigard Times for consecutive publishings on January 21 and January 28, larch 11 and March 18, and May 21 and May 28, 1981, prior to said hearings, and WHEREAS, said hearings were duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 SW Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on February 9, March 23 and June 1, 1981, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, by the terms of said resolution and publication, written objections or remonstrances from the owners of not less than 66-2/37, of property within the boundaries of said area were invited, and all objections and remonstrances as thus presented prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of less than 66-2/3i of the property in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the percen.agi! of remonstrance is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of said improvements; :. EuEAS, all proceedings to date have been in conformity with 223.387 and 223.30 'i 9 Oregon Revised Statutes and Tigard Municipal Code - Title 13, of the City of Tigard, and all procedures were regularly and lawfully conducted. NO',!, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOL.LO:•1S: Bane 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 81--' • Secticn 1: That all matters set forth in the resolution of the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, on January 12, 1951, a copy whereof is hereto ' ached marked Exhibit "A" and by reference herein made a part hereof to the same �- �`al fo-.cc and effect as if set forth herein in full, be, and the same are hereby approved, ratified, and confirmed, and the boundaries of the area known as S.W. 72nd Avenue Street improvement District as heretofore described in said resolution, be, and the same are hereby, declared and fixed in accordance with said description, and as modified by the motion calling for the adoption of this ordinance as follows: Proposal "A". That SW 72nd Avenue be improved to the basic city standard 44 foot width curb to curb from just north of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive) southerly along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road to a point just south of SW Durham Road and southerly along SW 72nd Avenue to the city limit line and to the basic city standard 40 foot'width curb to curb from just north of the intersection of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive) northerly along SW 72nd Avenue to just north of SW Varnes Road east of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Bonita, matching the existing improvement at I-5, through the SW 72nd Avenue intersection. Deductive alternates under this proposal shall include street lighting, rail- road crossing improvements, traffic signals and sidewalks along one side of the total length of the project. Proposal "B". That SW 72nd Avenue be improved to the basic city standard 44 foot width curb to curb from just north of the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive) southerly along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road to a point just south of SW Durham Road and southerly along SW 72nd Avenue to the city limit line and that SW 72nd Avenue be graded to a standard 44 foot road bed and paved to a 28 foot width without curbs and accow odating as much stormdrainage in ditches as possible. Deductive alternates under this proposal shall include traffic signals, railroad crossings and street lights. An additive alternate shall be an additional 6 foot width marked for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Assessment distribution shall be as outlined in the engineers report and shall incorporate varying rates for different stic•et sections. Property owner particippation shall be limited, exclusive of right-of-way costs exceeding $50,000 to $1.3 to $1.5 million. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Tigard, having acquired jurisdiction to order the improvement to be made, do.-s hereby authorize and direct the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of said S14 72nd Avenue Street Improvement District in conformity in all reasonable particulars with the plans and specifications by said resolution adopted and heret•y ratified and confirmed. Section 3: That the City administrator and the City Engineer be, and they are hereby, directed to proceed with final construction plans and invite proposals for the construction of said improvements by publication in the Tigard Times in not less than two consecutive issues, the first publication to be not less than ten (10) days prior to tine date set for opening the bids. The date and time for opening bids shall be fixed and determined by the City Engineer and such date shall be not later than J1, 1982, at which time bids will be opened in the City of. Tigard, Oregon, City 4a`tt, 12420 SS.' fain Street, all proposals to be then and there publicly read. Page 2 of 3 OitDIN-AXCE no. 81-1;- 'Secti•r. That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the attached ' EXMISIT "_\" are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment sLrict, and it is further declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land _nin said boundaries will be especially benefitted by said improvements, and that the total es[i .a[-d cost of the project is $3,097,000 and that the assessable cost, not to exceed $1,5G'),000, exclusive of rich[-of-way costs exceeding $50,000, shall be assessed in full, according to benefit against all lands within said improvement district, and that any grants or similar offsets in costs received by the City of Tigard will be used to further increase the City participation and reduce the assessable costs. Section 5: The Tigard city Council finds that the SW 72nd Avenue Local Improvement District improvements are of the character described in ORS 223.205, and that they therefore qualify for financing by general obligation improvement warrants pursuant to ORS 287.502 - 287.510. Section 6: General obligation improvement warrants For the Std 72nd Avenue Local Improvement District are hereby authorized to be issued in the aggregate amount of $3,097,000. The warrants shall bear interest at the lowest rate that the City can borrow on the date of issuance and shall constitute a general obligation of the City of Tigard that shall mature on or before two years after the date of issue, but not later than June 1, 1984. Warrants shall be retired as funds are received in accordance with ORS 287.506. Section 7: The Mayor and City Recorder are hereby authorized to execute the described warrants in behalf of the City of Tigard. Section 8: That inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, bealth, and siifety of the people of the City of Tigard that the said improvements be constructed with least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and signature by the Mayor. PASSED: By the Council, by unanimous vote of all Council members-present, after being read two times by number and title only, this ^_Y-') day of j�. t2 e 1981. r-.�/L../fes-..• Recorder APPROVFD: By the t ayur, this 'P --- day of xF 1981. —_ , _f..:r_t_r�._...,r::�" tayor / PAGE f of 3 0Risi:. -5- CiTY OI' 'r GA!'.1), 0..u..(-,w.! ORDINANCE. No. t;l ' (iICtIC ' i[ 72dE kVi° �� LID PSl1.ASI 1t I'U ilMENDINCORO - / '' RG E`.NCY VNE^EAS, the Tigard City Co-tncil finds it. : cotu)tni�:ally advant-ag_ous to adjust t1he of t -: he ro_.[1 bed under propos : "A - a:ul :11: For 1.1w72tut A:c..__ LID. NOW, TIILREs-:;F, THE CITY O TIGARD ORDAIF.S AS F01.I.0'�S: Section 1: Section 1 Paragraph 2 and 4 ()f C)t:dl.ttanca 8t•=:7 are s_mr-n4' : to osier as follows: • "PrTosal "F". That SW 72nd Aveut: be it"PtAwed to the L=-sic cit;: standard t," foot aidttl curb to curb from jur.l. vorth of th: intersection of SW 72nd Ave:tue arlc �a Upp::r Roonas :er.ry i;oatd (::a nn•^_u I)c.iv�) so;:therly :.Jong SW tipper BaoreZ For Road to a point just Sw,t:l :Std n,)ad and Sc-therly along S!,)_ 72� Avenue to the c_ty li.rni.t ).ine -"([(I to t=ire i�asic r_it. sianiard 40 foot wid_h curb to curb from just ttoi til of the i,:te.section of St4 Upper Roones Fer— Road (Carinen l;_?ve) novOic-cly :110119, :"!-1 ;:2nd Avenue- to just north o: SW :arnes Road east of Sid 72ttd l.vcn ue anti ,:ita, twat^-hin, the existing i.mpw _ ement at T••5, through the Sid/ 2[,[t Av;ir:" :.rltcrs�cr � "Prc-josal "B". That SW 72nd A'•/..7,1:" OC to the t;esic city standard /•C foo: width curb to ;.c_b from jt!:;L tkotti) of intersec:`_o:t of SW 72nd Avertue and SW Upper Boones Terry goad (t;:: wren D+:ivc) s:,utherl along SW Upper Boo:.c•:: _. F•erry Road to a point jus:: COLt;:lt 01' S%4 l=oad arid rcutherly along SW 72!-!--: Avenue to the city _i it line attd tlta;. SU i?.t: Ave1)ue bo graded t0 a staas;�.�c 40 foot road bed and -zaved to - 7..8 loot W.idi�_ ; Lhout curbs and accormoC -ti g ar, much stortadrainage ;n ditch_; air: i)t>::::i.i�lr . l�educr_ivc alternates uncle_ t�_r proposal shall incl e traffic :i.gt +ls, :ai ,`mac crossi^-rs and street lig:: Section 2: Th1L inasmuch as it i3 hehlth, E.nj safety of the people of the City o_' Tigard 11--t t: he s^t. _ '-Gveme-ats _e constructed t:.tom the least pa si.ble &A, is hereby declaat-cd to exi 3:• ::RAE !.lt::. Ut'Cl:i eG �lr:l.l }:�_O!lc' effective i!�J'. its paszige by the Council avid ::pp uv:t 1. by tk,e hL ynr. tt l:" .._. +:.... aJ•. � - !' - .L'.. , .. ... _ '••` -'1.!. {.G'.'.. .. _ �.i.-]U1tJ�l':, D:._:.:^.. fjj i r . EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF L.I.D. Beginning at the northwest corner of T.L. 701 , 2SllD3; thence S 0°4' W along the westerly Iine of T.L. 701 122 feet to the northerly right of way of Yarns Street (a 50 foot right of way)-, thence southwesterly approximately 51 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 710, 2SllD3 located on the southerly right of way line of `'arns Street; thence S 0009' E along the Wrest line of T.L. 710 143.28 feet; thence S 89005' W along the North line �QC3B tor+ninv �hirh is gan d'nnf /nnrnur+�lir+il�r �ic�ani•o� of T.L. • 2511 Y- ' %r._ r_...._..- �.r•• ..f..- from the westerly right of way line of S.W. 72nd K.enua; t e nca so;:tilerly approximately 355 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 100, 2SllDC, which is ocated-on-the.easterly-0911-it-of way line of 74th Avenue (a.40 foot riSfit. way); thence southerly along the easterly right of way line of 74th Avenue . _ approximately 756 feet; thence N 88°48' W across 74th Avenue and aTong .the - -.northerly line of T.L. 800, 2SllDC 820.57 feet to the southerly corner of: : - - T.L. 2000;'ZSITDC; thence N 41051' W 251 .38 feet to the north:-resterly-corner of T.L. 800; thence southerly along the West line of T.L. 800 approximately 440 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way) ; thence southeasterly along said right of way line approximately 2000 feet to the southwest corner of T.L. 402, 2S112A; Chence East along the South line of T.L. 402 approximately 400 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 501 , 2S112A; thence S 0009' W 326.2 feet along the West line of T.L. 501 and its southerly extension to the northerly right of way line of Bonita Road (a 40 foot right of way) ; thence southwesterly approximately 50 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 1900, 23112A; thence S 0'39' E approximately 8U feet to the southar2st corner of T.L. 1900; thence 5 55°55'38" W along the northerly _ line of T.L. 1902, 25112A 163.11 feet to the northeasterly right of gray line of the Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way) ; thence southeasterly dlong said right of way line approximately 1000 feet to a point on the northerly 'line extended of T.L. 400, 2511203; thence S 83°14'07" W along said northerly t line approximately 458.9 feet to the northest corner of T.L. 400, said point being on the easterly right of way line of the Oregon Electric Pail:•ray; thence southerly along said right of way line approximately 2255 feet to the southwest corner of T.L. 200, 2S112DC. thence N 88°29'35" E 316.61 feet to the southeast corner of T.L. 200; thence S 00°02'40" E 253.15 feet to a point on the West line of T.L. 2102, 2S112D; thence S 89°46'10" W along the North line of T.L. 1900, .2S112D approximately 380 feet to the easterly right of way line of the Oregon Electric Railway; thence southwesterly 163.8 feet to the northerly right of wayt of Fanno Creek Place (a 40 foot right of way) ; thence southwasterly approximately 41 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 1301 , 2Sll3A; thence southwesterly . approximately 460 feet along the West line of T.L. 1301 and T.L. 1200, 2S1.3A to � the southwest corner of T.L. 1200, said point being on the northerly right of way - line of Durham Road (a 60 foot right of way) ; thence S 29052` W 60 feet to the southerly right of way of Durham Road; thence southeasterly along said southerly right of way approximately 245 feet to the northerly right of way of Upper Boones Ferry Road (a 60 foot right of way); thence S 48017' W along said northerly right: - of tray line of Upper Boones Ferry Road approximately 165 feet; thence S 41043' £ —a or°xim�t_ly 284 feet to a -point on the est line of T.L-:- 1100,-2Sll3A; thence - - . p. _ - -South along the West line of T.L. 1100 approximately 230 feet; thence 4lest along . the Morth lire of T.L. 2100, 2S113A approximately 185 feet; thence South along a West lire -of*T.L. 2100 243 feet; thence West along a North.-line of T.L. 2100 .-_ 120 feet; thence South along a hest line of T.L. 2100 100 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 50 feet; thence South along a West line of T.L. 2100 383 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 approximately 150 feet; thence South along a 'Fest line of T.L. 2100 297 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 approximately 146.67 feet; thence South along a gest line of T.L. 2100 297 feet; thence easterly along the South lines of Tax Lots . 2100 and 2101 , 2Sll 3A and their extensions 1020 feet to the West right of way line of Interstate 5 (I-5) ; thence northerly along the westerly right of way line of Interstate 5 (I-5) approximately 2390 feet to the southerly right of way line of Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right cif vlav); thence riot-thl:a•.sterly along said southerly right of way line approximately 1160 feet to the northerly right of way of Upper Boones Ferry Road; thence northeasterly along the northerly right of way line of Upper Boones Ferry Road approxi-iately 660 feet to the - westerly right of way of Interstate 5 (I-5) ; thence northLrly ?nd northviesterly l along the westerly line of Interstate 5 ( I-5) and southeasterly right of way line � of State High,.-jay Mo. 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) approximately 7500 fee-' to { ten easterly right of clay line o` 72nd Avenue (a 105 foot right of way) ; thence p -2- -1 southerly along said easterly line approximately 45 feet; thence westerly approximately 105 feet to the northeast corner of T.L. 701 , 2511D3; thence S 89005. W along the Borth line of T.L. 701 100.98 feet to the point of beginning. R +fix c` EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TIGAP.D. OREGON i RESOLUTION No. 81 DECLPURING Alt INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN STREET II`H"ROVE EI TS W1 IN AN AREA DETERM ED TO BE A STREET DWROVa- MN1 ASSESSt•ENT DISTRICT TO BE KLN014N AS SOL'Ta EST 72nd AVENUE AREA L.I.D. No. 21; DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST THEREOF: DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BE''IEFI ED AND ASSESSED: i V L i i APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TIE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTIi:G THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted a petition requesting Street improvements and has ordered preparation. of a preliminary engineering report, pursuant thereto, at the Council's regular meeting of May 19, 1980,- and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council finds it expedient and necessary to order the improvement of the hereinbelow-des crib ed lands by'construction of street-facilities ani appuren tances'thereto, 'and pursuant thereto the City's Engineer. has submitted to the Council _plans, specifications. and estimates for the work to be done and the probable cost thereof together with a statement of the lots, parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefited and the oportionment of the total cost of the improvements Which each of said lots, parts of lots and parcels of land snarl be asses•3ed on account of the benefits derived-, and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said plans, specifications and estiEL-Ates are satisfactory. INOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ME CITY OF TIGARD as follou3: (a) That the City Council does hereby deem it expedient and necessary, and does hereby declare its inten.tion'to improve the aforesaid Southwest 72nd Avenue Area by construction of street facilities and appurtenances thereto. (b) That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the attached "E:C-:IBIT A" are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment district, to be known as "Southwest 72nd Avenue Area", and it is Aliirtfier declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel ®f land within said boundaries will be especially benefited by said improvements, and that the total estimated assessable cost of $2,718,02:.12 for said improvements, shall be assessed in full, on-a combination front foot-area basis against all lands within said improvement district. (c) That the plans, specifications and estimates with respect to the atrf_at improvements as submitted by the City's engineers be, and the same are hereby, adopted and ordered to be maintained on file by the City Recorder for public inspection. G (d) That Yonday, the 9th day of February, 1981, at the hour of 8:00 F.ri. , at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10365 S:. Walr.tit, Tigard, Oregon, be, and the same are hereby set as the time and place for hearing and considering objections or remonstrances to the proposed inprovec=nt by any parties aggrieved thereby, R=S01 U T ION No. 81 - a� (e) That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby, directed to give notice by causing to have this resolution published in the Tigard Ti=es, issues of January 21,1981 and January 28, 1981. PASSED: By Council on this 1,�� day of 1981' Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: Recorder City or Tigar w i Pa^•� ? 81 _ C CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 82-22 DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SOUTHWEST 72nd AVENUE AREA L.I.D. No. 21; DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST THEREOF: DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND ASSESSED: APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE .CITY'S ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. 1 WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted a petition requesting street improvements and has ordered preparation of a preliminary engineering report, pursuant thereto, at the Council's regular meeting of May 19, 1980, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council finds it expedient and necessary to order the improvement of the hereinbelow described lands by construction of street facilities and appurentances thereto, and pursuant . thereto the City's Engineer has submitted to the Council plans, specifications and estimates for the work to be done and the probable cc,st therof together with a statement of the lots, parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefited and the apportionment of the total cost of the improvements which each of said lots, parts or lots and parcels of land shall be assessed on account of the benefits derived; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said plans, specifications and estimates are satisfactory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD as follows: (a) That the City Council does hereby deem it expedient and necessary, and does hereby declare its intention to improve the aforesaid Southwest 72nd Avenue Area by construction of street facilities and appurtenances thereto. (b) That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the attached "EXHIBIT A" are determined and declared to be a street improvement assessment district, to be known as Southwest 72nd Avenue Area", and it is further declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefited by said improvements, and that the cost of $1,500,000 plus right- of-way acquisition costs in excess of $50,000.00 for said improvements, shall be = assessed in full, on a combination front foot-area basis against all lands within said improvement district. ,s (c) That the plans, specifications and estimates with respect to the street improvements as submitted by the City's engineers be, and the same are hereby, adopted and ordered to be maintained on file by the City ReCa)rdel' for public inspection. (d) That tSonday, the 29th day of Xarch 1982, :at the hour of 8:00 P.M. , at Fowler Junior High School Lecturr Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut , Tigard, Oregon, be, and the same are hereby set as the time and place for hearing and considering objections or i remonstrances to the proposed improvement by any parties aggrieved thereby. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 82-22 (C (e) That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby, directed to give notice by causing to have this resolution published in the Tigard Times, issues of March 18, 1982 and March 25, 1982. PASSED: By Council on this 8 day of March , 1982. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: Recorder - City of Tiga RESOLUTION NO. 82-22 _- 72nd AVENUE AREA L.I.D. No. 21 2 r EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF L.I.D. Beginning at the northwest corner of T.L. 701 , -2Si103; thence S 0°4' W along the westerly line of T.L. 701 122 feet to the northerly right of way of Varns Street (a 50 foot right of way); thence southwesterly approximately 51 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 710, 2SllDB located on the southerly right of way line of Varns Street; thence S •0°09' E along the West line of T.L. 710 143.28 feet; thence S 89°05' W along the North line of T.L. 800, 2SllDB to a point which is 290 feet (perpendicular distance) from the westerly right of way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence southerly approximately 355 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 100, 2S1lDC, which is located arr-the easterly-right- way) ; way line of.74th Avenue (a.40 foot.r-ight.ii; way) ; thence..southerly along the easterly right of way line of 74th Avenue _ approximately 756 feet; thence Ii 88°48' W across 74th Avenue and along the - northerly -line_ of T.L. 800, 2SllDC 820.57 feet to the southerly corner of T.L. 2000;"2S1TDC; thence•N 41°51' W .251.38 feet to the northwesterly' corner of T.L. 600; thence southerly along the West line of T.L. 800 approximately 440 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way); thence southeasterly along said right of wady line approximately 2000 feet to the southwest corner of T.L. 402, 2_SMA; thence East along the South line of T.L. 402 approximately 400 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 501 , 2S112A; thence S 0d09' W 326.2 feet along the West line of . I.L. 501 and its southerly extension to the northerly right of way line of Bonita Road (a 40 foot right of way) ; thence southwesterly approximately 50 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 1900, 2S112A; thence S 0°39' E approximately 380 feet to the southwest corner of T.L. 1900; thence S 55°55'38" W along the northerly - line of T.L. 1902, 2S112A 163.11 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way) ; thence southeasterly along said right of way line approximately 1000 feet to a point on the northerly line extended of T.L. 400, 2Sll2DB; thence S 88°14'07" i•1 along said northerly { line approximately 458.9 feet to the northwest corner of 'r.L. 400, said 4oint being on the easterly right of way line of the Oregon Electric Railway; thence �. southerly along said right of way line approximately 2255 feet to the south�iest corner of T.L. 200, 2Sll2DC; thence N 88029`35" E 316.61 feet to the southeast r_ corner of T.L. 200; thence S 00°02'40" E 253.15 feet to a point on the West . line of T.L. 2102, 2S112D; thence S 89°46'10" W along the (North line of T.L. 1900, '2Sll2D approximately 380 feet to the easterly right of way line of the Oregon Electric Railway; thence southwesterly 163.8 feet to the northerly right of way of Fanno Creek Place (a 40 foot right of way); thence southwesterly approximately 41 feet to the northwest corner of T.L. 1301, 2Sll3A; thence south:resterly approximately 480 feet along the Ilest line of T.L. 1301 and T.L. 1200, ZS113A to the southwest corner of T.L. 1200, said point being on the northerly right of tray dine of Durham Road (a 60 foot right of tray); thence 5 29 52 W 60 feet to the . southerly right of way of Durham Road; thence southeasterly along said southerly right of way approximately 245 feet to the northerly right of way of Upper Boones Ferry Road (a 60 foot right of tray); thence S 48 17 tN along said northerly right- of way line of Upper Boones Ferry. Road approximately 165 feet; thence S 41°43' E. approximately 284 feet to a point on the West line of T.L-. 1100,-2S113A; thence South along the West line of T.L. 1100 approximately 230 feet; thence blest along the North line -of T.L. 2100, 2S113A approximately 1II5 feet; thenca South along- line of T.L. 2100 243 feet; thence t•lest alcng a !North line ..T.L.. 2100 a test -0f •• 120 feet; thence South along a West line of T.L. 2100 100 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 50 feet; thence South along a tlest line of T.L. 2100 383 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 approximately 190 feet; thence South along a West line of T.L. 2100 297 feet; thence East along a South line of T.L. 2100 approximately 146.67 feet; thence South along ablest line of T.L. 2100 297 feet; thence easterly along the South lines of Tax Lots 2100 and 2101 , 2Sl13A and their extensions 1020 feet to the Vest right of way line of Interstate 5 (I-5) ; thence northerly along the westerly right of way line of Interstate 5 (I-5) approximately 2390 feet to the southerly right of way line of Southern Pacific Railroad (a 100 foot right of way) ; thence northwesterly along said southerly right of way line approximately 1160 feet to the northerly right of way of Upper Boones Ferry Road; thence northeasterly along the northerly right of way line of Upper Boones Ferry Road approximately 660 feet to the westerly right of way of Interstate 5 (1-5) ; thence northerly and northwesterly t along the westerly line of Interstate 5 (I-5) and southcaterly right of Wray line of State Highway No. 217 (Beaverton-Tigard highway) approximately 7560 feet to the easterly right of way line of 72nd Avenue (a 105 foot right of "lay) ; thence 2 southerly along said easterly line approximately 45 feet; thence westerly approximately 105 feet to the northeast corner of T.L. 701, 2SllDB; thence _S 89005' W along the North line of T.L. 701 100.98 feet to the point of beginning. ti CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE No. 82- ")__ AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ASSESSMENT FORMULA FOR THE S. W. 72ND AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 21 , CREATED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 82-13; ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 82-13 was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Tigard, following a public hearing at its regular meeting of March 29, 1982, which ordinance is incorporated herein by ' reference and made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, in response to public comments and testimony at said March 29, 1982 public hearing, the City Council of Tigard scheduled, by adoption on motion, a public hearing to be held in Fowler Junior ' High School at 10865 S. W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon on April 12, 1982, at the hour of 8: 00 p.m. to consider public testimony concerning the assessment formula for LID No. 21; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 1982, a letter was mailed by the City of Tigard to all real property owners within the boundaries of S. W. 72nd Avenue LID No. 21 notifying them of said public hearing for the purpose of considering a proposed assessment based upon a combination frontagelarea formula; and WHEREAS, due and legal notice of said hearing was given by publication in the Tigard Times on April 8, 1982 , prior to said hearing; and WHEREAS, said hearing was duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School :at 10865 S. W. Walnut Street in -Tigard, Oregon, on April 12, 1982, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council scheduled, 'by adoption on motion, a public hearing to be held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S. W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on May 3, 1982 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. to consider four alternative assessment formulas and any variations thereon; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 1982, a letter from the Director of Public Works, City of Tigard, was mailed to all real property owners within the S. W. 72nd Avenue -SID No. 21 notifying them of the public hearing scheduled for May 3, 1982, stating the purpose of said hearing and setting forth the four alternative assessment formulas to be considered; and 15 WHEREAS, due and legal notice of said hearing was given by publi- cation in the Tigard Times for consecutive publishings on April 22 -and April 29, 1982, prior to said hearing; and E`lt�itBlT"!� 2 Page t?fiLIINANC'E No. 82—: ,�,, .� WHEREAS, said hearing was duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, on May 3, 1982 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, all proceedings to date have been in conformity with 223.387 and 223.389 Oregon Revised Statutes and Tigard Municipal Code - Title 13, of the City of Tigard, and all procedures were regularly and lawfully conducted; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That assessment of real property owners within the S.W. ( 72nd Avenue Local Improvement District No. 21 shall be in accordance with the following formula: a. Total PREASSESSMENT ($1,475.711.35) equals $1,500,000 less one-half of estimated sidewalk costs ($34,773.56) , less one- x half of estimated street light costs ($20,505.62) , plus $30,990.53 for Tech Center Drive. E b. Distribute one-half of equivalent cost of a 34 foot street to property within 200 feet of the street improvement (total cost $1 ,157,026.64) . One-quarter of such costs a ($289, 256.66) are to be spread on a frontage basis and one- quarter uarter ($289,256 .66) are to spread on an area basis over the property within 200 feet of said improvements. One- half of such costs ($578,513. 32) are to spread on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. C. Distribute costs of the traffic signal at 72nd (southbound) and S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road ($66,678 . 15) to Pacific Realty Trust property lying southerly of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road (see Exh. "A" to Findings and Conclusions attached hereto) on an area basis. d. Distribute estimated cost to the City ($20,000) for the spur- track railroad crossing protection facilities to Southern Pacific Company (Ident. No. 63) and P.redelivery Service (Ident. No. 64) on an area basis (see Exh. "B" to Findings and Conclusions attached hereto) . e. Separate costs for construction of Tech Center Drive $30,990. 53) are assessed on a one-quarter frontage and three-quarters area basis to Ident. No. 12a per agreement. f. The n angareaebasiseovertthe$enti0re6assessableoab spreadad oorea of the district. I Page 2 ORDINANCE No. 82- _ ITEM COST Frontage $ 289,256.66 Area (within 200 feet) 289, 256.66 Signal to Pac Trust 66,678. 15 Spur Xing to SPTC & Predelivery 20,000.00 Tech Center Drive 30, 990.53 Area (total assessable) 779 ,529. 35 TOTAI. PREASSESSMENT $1,475,711. 35* *Subject to increases for any right-of-way costs exceeding $50,000.00. Section 2: That the Findings and Conclusions attached hereto be and hereby are adopted in support of the assessment formula described in Section 1 . Section 3: That inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the affected property owners be notified of the assessment herein with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and signature by the Mayor. PASSED: By the Council, by �l,,r ,., , ,,,,,,, , vote of all Council members present, after being read two times by number and title only, this 10th day of May, 1982. Recorder - Cityof�'I'igard APPROVED: By the Mayor this day of ! 1982 . Mayor - City of Tigard Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. 82-./ -( _ BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIGARD, OREGON 4, (� IN RE: Ordinance No. 82-_2_�_, ) adopting an assessment formula ) for S. W. 72nd Avenue LID No. ) FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • 21, established under Ordinance ) No. 82-13. ) THIS MATTER came before the City Council of the City of Tigard for public hearing on May 3, 1982, following publication in accordance with the Tigard Municipal Code and written notice to affected property owners, for consideration of four alternative assessment formulas and variations thereof for the above-referenced Local Improvement District. Pursuant to published notice, the hearing was convened at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S. W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, at 7: 30 p.m, on said date. Upon consideration of the alternate formulas presented by staff and public testimony concerning those alternatives' and proposed variations, the City Council makes the following findings and conclusions. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS The Oregon courts apply the substantial evidence test in deter- mining whether a local government' s assessment of private property for public improvements is supportable. In Western Amusement v. Springfield, 275 Or 37, 43, 545 Ptd 592 (1976) , the court cited 4 Davis, Administrative Law, 126 § 29 .02 (1958) , in defining substan- tial evidence as "a variable" . The court went on to sav that: "We consider our authority to be that in determining whether the city council' s action is supported by substantial evidence we can consider the long and well founded policy of judicial restraint in this area. " Id. In Gilbert v. City of Eugene, 255 Or 289 , 292 , 465 P2d 880, 882 (1970) , the court held that: 2 " [Tlhe city council's determination*** [ofl the amount of the benefit is conclusive unless the court can say that �. the city council's action was probably arbitrary and . abusive. " Cited in Hiransomboon v. City of Tigard, 35 Or 595, 582 Ptd 34, 36 (1978) and Chrysler Corp. v. City of Beaverton, 25 Or App 361, 549 P2d 678, 680 (1976) . ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT FORMULAS The four alternative assessment formulas considered by the City Council are attached hereto in the letter from Marvin J. DeHaas, P.E. , dated April 19 , 1982. We find that all four of the alternative formulas are legally supportable and represent standard methods of assessing property for public improvements, including districtwide assessments based on square footage, assessments based on frontage and assessments based on special benefits received by individual property owners from particular improvements. We further find that the assessment formula adopted herein is equitable to the property owners within the district. The Council has considered the conflicting testimony and attempted to strike a compromise between those property owners who would benefit inordinately if the assessment were based purely on area owned districtwide and those who contend the frontage-based assessment is more fair. The assessment adopted places a portion of the burden on all property owners in the district and, in three instances, assesses individual property owners for specific improvements. These three specific improvements are: 1. Traffic signal at 72nd (southbound) and S . W. Upper Boones Ferry Road -- assessed to Pacific Realty Trust property lying southerly of S. W. Upper Boones Ferry Road; 2. Spur-track railroad crossing protection facilities -- assessed to Southern Pacific Traction Company and Predelivery Service; and 3 3. Tech Center Drive -- assessed to Western International Properties. In each instance, we find the individual property owner will receive a greater benefit from the respective improvement than will other property owners in the district or city. Each of the three improve- ments assists in the use of or provides improved access to the affected parcels. The assessment of Tech Center Drive to Western International Properties is supported by the testimony of the City's Director of Public Works. The Director recommended Western International Properties be assessed for the full cost of the improvement and stated that another adjoining property owner, Circle A-W did not benefit from the improvement to Tech Center Drive. BENEFIT OF IMPROVEMENTS TO DISTRICT The Council finds the improvements to be made within LID No. 21 are expedient and necessary. We further find that said improvements will create special, additional benefits for property owners within the district that are not shared by the public at large. Paramount among these special benefits are improved access to parcels adjacent k to and in the vicinity of the improvements, improved traffic flow and F circulation on the improved streets and greater vehicular and pedes- It trian safety for the users of the adjoining and nearby properties. These findings are supported by the overwhelming public testimony in the record in favor of the proposed improvements, although the testimony contained disagreements as to particular assessment formulas. E The Director of Public Works stated at the hearing that the written 4 �:.• and oral testimony contained 15 parties supporting assessment formula i la , seven parties supporting assessment formula lb, three parties i q supporting assessment formula 2a and eight parties supporting assess- ment formula 2b. Of the written and oral testimony submitted at the May 3, 1962 hearing, only three parties expressed disapproval of all • of the assessment formulas. In general, we find that all properties within the district derive benefit from the improvements, despite the present use or zoning of a particular parcel. Recognizing that the city as a whole also benefits from improved streets and traffic circulation, the City will pay for 23% of the cost of the improvements, compared with a more typical participation amount for the City at 15%. We find the chosen assessment formula distributes the burden of the improve- ments most equitably among all property owners who will benefit from the improvements. CONCLUSION The record contains substantial evidence supporting the City Council 's adoption of the final assessment formula for the S.W. 72nd Avenue LID No. 21. The Council's adoption of the assessment formula strikes an equitable compromise among competing interests of affected property owners by distributing the assessment among three affected groups: (1) Those properties with frontage along the improvements; (2) Those properties specially benefited by specific improvements; and (3) The general benefit to all property owners in the district. As such, the assessment formula has a rational basis and is well supported in fact and law. DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONS ULTING ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS JITF 445-AGC CENTER tiVILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070 ,r (503) 682-2450 1 V450 S. V. COMMERCE CIRCLE w gg 3 April 19, 1982 ( } Mr. Frank Currie k 12755 S.W. Ash Ave. P.O. Box 23397 Dear Frank: ' In accordance with April 12, 1982 instructions of the Tigard City Council , £ we have recalculated PRE-ASSESSMENTS for L.I .D. 21 -- S-W. 72nd Avenue Area Street Improvements. For identification purposes, we have designated the assessment methods as la., lb. , 2a. , 2b. respectively. PRE-ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS for all methods include $50,000 for right-of- g way costs. It is understood that any right-of-way costs exceeding $50,000 will be in addition to the PRE-ASSESSMENT totals and will be distributed on an area basis to the total assessable area as a part of a SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Assessment method la. is the method recommended by the ENGINEER, except for the limitation in the total assessable amount, which amount was prescribed by Tigard City Council . Alternate methods lb., 2a., 2b. , are methods prescribed by the Tigard City Council at their meeting of April 12, 1982. Methods lb. and 2b. require $55,279.18 increased city participation. The assessment methods can be described as follows : Method la. 1. Total PRE-ASSESSMENT ($1 ,530,990.53) equals $1 ,500,000.00 plus $30,990.53 for Tech Center Drive. 2. Distribute equivalent cost of a 34 foot street to property within 200 feet of the street improvements ($1 ,151,026.64) . One-half of such costs ($578,513.32) are to be spread on a frontage basis and one-half ($578,513.32) are to be spread on an area basis. 3. Separate costs for construction of Tech Center ($30,990is .53) are assessed on an one-half area Ident. No. 12a per agreement. 1 Page 2 April 19, 1982 (Method la. cont) 4. The remaining assessable costs ($342,973.36) are to be spread on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. ITEM COSTS Frontage $578,513.32 Area (within 200 feet) $578,513.32 Tech Center Drive $ 30,990.53 Area (total assessable) $342,973.36 TOTAL PRE-ASSESSMENT: $1 ,530,990.53 Method lb. 1. Total PRE-ASSESSMENT ($1 ,475,711 .35) equals $1 ,500,000 less one-half of estimated sidewalk costs ($34,773.56) , less one-half of estimated street light costs ($20,505.62) , plus $30,990.53 for Tech Center Drive. • 2. Distribute equivalent cost of a 34 foot street to property within 200 feet of the street improvements ($1 ,157,026.64) . One-half of such costs ($578,513.32) are to be spread on a frontage basis and one-half ($578,513:32) are to be spread on an area basis. 3. Distribute costs of the traffic signal at 72nd (southbound) and S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road ($66,678.15) to Pacific Realty Trust property lying southerly of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road (See Exhibit "A") on an area basis. 4. Distribute estimated cost to the City ($20,000) for the spur-track railroad crossing protection facilities to Southern Pacific Company (Ident. No. 63) and Predeiivery Service (Ident. Pio. 64) on an area basis (See Exhibit "B") . S. Separate costs for construction of Tech Center Drive ($30,990.53) are assessed on a one-half frontage and one-halt area basis to Ident. No. 12a per agreement. 6. . The remaining assessable costs ($201 ,016.03) are to be spread on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. i i s' i Page3 Api l 19, 1982 (Method lb. cont) fr r ITEM COSTS f Frontage $578,513.32 Area (within 200 feet) 578,513.32 Signal to Pac Trust 66,678.15 Spur Xing to SPTC & Predelivery 20,000.00 30,990.53 Tech Center Drive Area (total assessable) 201 ,016.03 TOTAL PRE-ASSESSMENT: $1 ,475,711 .35 s Method 2a. s 1. Total PRE-ASSESSMENT ($1 ,530,990.53) equals $1 ,500,000 plus r $30,990.53 for Tech Center Drive. 2. Separate costs for construction of Tech Center Drive ($30,990.53) are assessed on an area basis to Ident. No. 12a per agreement. 3. Distribute $1 ,500,000 on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. ITEM COSTS Tech Center Drive $ 30,990.53 Area (total assessable) $1 ,500,000.00 TOTAL PRE-ASSESSIVIT: $1 ,530,990.53 Method 2b. 1 . Total PRE-ASSESSMENT ($1 ,475,711 .35) equals $1 ,500,000 less one-half of estimated sidewalk costs ($34,773.56) , less one-half of estimated street light costs ($20,505.62) plus $30,990.53 for Tech Center Drive. 2. Distribute costs of the traffic signal at 72nd (southbound) and S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road ($66,678.15) to Pacific Realty Trust property lying southerly of S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road (see Exhibit "A") on an area basis. 3. Distribute estimated cost to the City ($20,000) for the spur-track railroad crossing protection facilities to Southern Pacific Company (Ident. No. 63) and Predelivery Service ( Ident. No. 64) on an area basis (see Exhibit "B"} , Page 4 April 19, 1932 (Method 2b. con' t) 4. Separate costs for construction of Tech Center Drive ($30,990.53) are assessed on an area basis to Ident. No. 12a per agreement. 5. The remaining assessable costs ($1 ,358,042.67) are to be spread on an area basis over the entire assessable area of the district. ITEM COSTS Signal to Pac Trust $ 66,678.15 Spur Xing to SPC & Predel i very ?0,000.00 Tech Center Drive Area (total assessable) $1,358,042.67 TOTAL PRE-ASSESSMENT: $1 ,475,711 .35 A cost distribution comparison of the methods is as follows: COST DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON ITEM ASSESSMENT METHOD la. lb. 2a. 2b. Frontage $578,513.32 $578,513.32 $ 0:00 $ 0.00 Area (wji 200 ft) 578,513.32 578,513.32 0.00 '0.00 Signal to Pac Trust 0.00 66,678.15 0.00 66,678.15 Spur Xing to SPC & Predelivery 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 Tech Center Drive 30,990.53 30,990.53 30,990.53 30,990.53 Area (total assessable) 342,973.36 201 ,016.03 1 ,500,000.00 1 ,358,042.67 TOTAL PRE-ASSESSMENT: $1 ,530,990.53 $1 ,475,711 .35 $1 ,530,990.53 $1 ,475,711 . 35 Note: 1. All methods are subject to increases for any right-of-way costs exceeding $50,000.00. 2. Methods lb. and 2b. require $55,279.18 increased city participation. C Page 5 April 19, 1982 Attached is a schedule of assessments for each PRE-ASSESSMENT method. These schedules may be inserted into the previously provided PRE-ASSESSMENT roll to comprise a new PRE-ASSESSMENT roll . Also, attached is the revised PRE-ASSESSMENT map showing all four (4) methods. Sincerely, MARLIN J E HAAS, P.E. MJO:tlj Attachments cc: 80.194.118 {{ i 1 • 1 , 41 42_ 1 60 1 / 1 • 1 43 / 1 i 44 `' 45 � r6 ; 58 57 i 114 t 1 47 C f 48 / e t 55 49 ° / 54 51 e .._. / 4 56 re d • — f 1 its 52 t 1 N C r 53b I Ii Pqr- I • I� 53 - I� 53o Ig 1 54 EYh h .t w iaw�.la • `-� 1 1s 2S1ttK Am* 22 23 1 cwatt A w r.o"I's ( la 11,110C 73 llo&*=a u moats \ 24 1 is :s11oc low jaK.S-NLIS ° (/ 0 Is MIX 231 sao a RYCattwitit 71 ii ISosltoa w.t • tt — g taSSI to y 26 o tlotlstc.l rums 0it nsizA 113 nkat$ 1 2T 2Ta to nuts iiatsra -t —— ——__ iY1U[ ° 26W y , nu EDIT DISTRICT 2® 115-4utwuwt°:1111 UNDAR 6T 68 69 ` ltsiss 30 V 7u0[i6CR R K 66 1 Footer It K 141 1 ` ( n tStttt, a 65 114 nillA ypa tl i 1 1 ` 3310 n111A i 1 64 :itt 34 o■+u""TV 1 roto► r000 1 33 .. o"ILATC-1 1 I 0 �• It is, i 1 1 36 IS 1 SI 2100tt 39 WK I s 63 M :S112a 1 2100 OUCL(salt n +, is :sti14 2100 I �, 1(L i■1(awif IOM�l I x ISI a - I } Utwtmm PACIFIC 1"Alat at SO I 1Y :slips ( - w ws.l a(cvlascs+ul�l' i 34 nit:Oa 300 SOUtw(ot PACIFIC 140tf/tat 1 n rsraa 1 too I Ith■Yts COWAM I :51170a ►BLE LANE ao tt ..� I KkvoRw I.vtst�(■f al :SIIYOC I :oo soutM■K►aClFlt I■taKtei/. all:x i X ' wt■ate raonnus i 41 42 ( ^ 13 t�troc. 1 e / 1 r(.itw ( / 1 41 MIRK L.I .D. 21 - S.W. 72nd Ave. Area Ident. PRE-ASSESSMENT METHODS (Per Council Instructions 4/12/82) rI NO. Ia. lb. 2a. 2b. 12 61 71 230 76 722- 2 30 /09F 129 6,V3 ! 70 3 .y :t3o -3 —2 ' S/ fU/7 i6/ S 8732 . 96 83 7 =52 36 SU .!. 33U ' Ei g73� . 96 83 . 7 Z 3GSo :o 33Oy. 6y 7 . y 6339 7/ 6OS� .5� 35 3 ♦ ./Z 3 ♦ 6 =>.5 e5 7 /O .x/74 4.1-10 .6 ::35VZ .7.Z .3 Z U 773 . V-5 21797 . 7/ 20 Zg; .7d /2a Sy Z E'c .`>'8 5/ 5 S✓ .v/ 59 7 7-sf.58 - 126 -.sy /eg� 7 1-2-.5-.20 1/ /3 2 76? 4 /6 Z 2' .6 7 /2,/o� _ 5Z �v 96 Z. 59 /9 ZO -?y7 . 45 / /oma .y 3oO5Z•5y / y7 /5 G�S7. 2 U -7 .�/7 Zy Z 7- 3' Z/ 9 7. .r /6 �o55.SG G G � .=Z J. �ry` - 7G ♦ 77 _ 76 / ? /2 7-//. 7/ -11 7G: .7/ 20876 20 1 773. z� 3vG /. 9 / ?2 / 4/5- eS . 6 7/ :�5 54 /o .41z 3 -41 563 :J6 /6) 20 S_95� _ 92-Vo . 0 7 29 .o,/ 7 /o y9o_8/ - y 36 668.82 26 73v5 {36 7c7_e G 2v��,G� 2 Zo5 . a 27o i/.z5rs � 76 a 3z 77.90 z 46 7 :76 27b ��/0 60 627 106 /3y.67 /z/ :93 Oa to: / L.I.O. 21 - S.W. 72nd Ave. Area Ident. PRE-ASSESSMENT METHODS (Per Council Instructions 4/12/82) Ne. ia. lh, 2a. 2b. ?� /,993 ' 7/ /902 34> G 965 .9l 7 el -.30 3/ 253 :37 217,--5-99 17/ /7 y9-V -G4 /� 3 ;b 3 / 9Gv/ �06 03 755 // 8936 .76 8d9 .£3! 32 X49/ .17,4 6 7 92 : 76 2,102 .73 ! 9 0 3- .7 33 3 996 .Oi 3.1617 .0.1/ -3-1 "!22 • 3' �)OS .9 2 3 3 3 3 :6 7 3,01A 35- 6,6-Ho -38 623/ _23 3 / 60. 9y 286/ - 7'9 3G 20. 9/. 93 / 9660 .92- 772-'/ -yo G9 ' .3 .37 /6 .6-7 3 5 -.3z 237 .OP /7, 7-�5,zs' �9 /7 73 .7 /7 l95 ..3 56 78 .S2 yU /-y 7s 2•! 7 /Z--5-6-0 -99 2 .3 ?e .2 S/ -2-11145 .3 -y/ 7 Z.2 2 ---17 2 9 99-1 -/ 20 7� -- �Z 23 22)770 -15 // 732- 78 q,9 93 . o i z S86 .70 -3 . 7 y ?-5-9. 7 9 8 7G .08 5'6, .56 ys 9-,-1171 -0 4 O - 70 3232 -eS 11-5-41 -86 ::3 9 1,720 -99 3 5 3 3,0--3-? .72 2$727. 3,2 #7 6,8 Fn '?9 5/67:01 2133, -2fe 2 /6 3" -'el Cf C 73 9 3 7/ 9 _51 2 A ,? 4R 90 - '4'7 x:57 /9 :6 / 7S3 3 / 5 .67 SOe3 s9 .I2? 503 �! 27076 . 19 2G3 :7 7.5195.9 7 .58 --T2 33 y02. 6171 .4/0 3 138 33 3 .113 410 S.z 3 i /2 t1a to: 2 Pa n" 2 L.I .O. 21 - S.W. 72nd Ave. Area Ident. PRE-ASSESSMENT METHODS (Per Council Instructions 4/12/82) NO. la. lb. 2a. 2b. 52 '' 4;,!5,066r,08 i' 7/ 4/94 +3 I = � -,0 9 �3,0 65-0 .3z 52 216,236.3-5- 27 546 1'/9 6 345 -5b- 7 6 7S.8-0 .53 /0.2;-/28!99 9/ 7G 3 11/3 //Zp G9 . /.9 le-10.2 I 40.3Z .63 /.B 23 :8 9 /3 3 •�� 1 9'3 / .9 3 : Sy �3,8y7 98 / 323 :8y z 67/ 4/5 - /Z 5/ 0</0 ;2 7 3/ OZ2 .S9 37 70•s/.to f 5 30 '0 99'G=3 3,2 329 . /! /D 35-1,89 /2 S�'y .9-/ 5G A, 3 l3 .Z6 Q6 22 .3 7 /S 366--32 13 "; 7-Y .4/2 5' _e,,-4 7.6a .3/ 03 6.03 23, 999 -96 2 t? /G7 .33 Z 9467.67 2H y96 .a2 70Sd .27 e,566.6.2 620.36 Sy • 71/ 17 .68 /U,3sz :06 73 345 52 ./8 .ZZ:5 3 9 9 '6 - _ 6- 715 15 .6 / 65 G1 2 98 - 2 6 2.711 5 i' /..112,2 _y<?� 762 .Z /,?Z/ .2y '75'6/ • 05 7 2 S.2 37- 7.5 l .34 2 //3 .413 < 7 -' 7f�t� .96 �7 67 115,2 •66 ,0! •:a 6 778/ .Z6 �80 9 y 78 -95_ 2GG/ .83 2.355 .Go r/ 3/ 9 03.23 22 G- 76 1,33-7 -30 9 9 79.05 9034 . .7Z 25 �a / 0/ 7/9-- /o -7 --, 03 .67 G y 33 33 4 :62 5'6' 738 56 33d 3.32 9S 7? 7 .2 G 616:90 72Y/ -99 7 /c7 .37 G6 /9,-// 7 •:22 7256 . /6 /ZZ4!50 . /V J/J /:'97 .3S 67 3S 53 1197 ;07 �o raiz •73 y/9 .166 3 3 1 2 3s•/ 5 8h /3/ 7 �y8 772 .17 6 .o/ S2 /6 :70 _ G 9 36/63 z6 212 0 a 66 /s 8 21/ , a /-y 376 '9� Da tc: Page: 3 L.I.O. 21 - S.W. 72nd Ave. Area Ident. PRE-ASSESSMENT METHODS (Per Council Instructions 4/12/82) No. la. lb. 2a. 2b. c 70c., ..d 6'ei ./O 7 7 �Z 9 5-sem j 3 -2 G</5" . /l/9 9.57 766 6009 .. 33 6237 .311 6B 13 ,669 - 3y /2 S56 _77 2 3! - Sy 72 ! 10O S3 06 . /7 y076 7/ AZ' 7/S . '07 2! 06! 72 /7 y70. 2--5- / / •E9 72cl 2 OS'o . 77 11923 - D4 /3 S/9 - /3 22 .y E 726 4yo7 ©y .39 6.3H-7e y6876 _8G i'2 4lyo -52 73773 �3 Z 79 7. 7/ 20 7 . 76 -D 3 7440 l G5 #7 /8 19/ _o z W -s° 7 3 .76 7416 22 . 11-7 .99 2 /J 2--s'✓_/8 /Z 7 80z63 -,69 75 3371 .33 _ 77 , 76 /!8/G - 5/ 647-9/ 33 74 _ 3® 693'.2.,/ 73 --s-6 0 . --J 9.2 413.413 -7 2 95. 79 / 7 60,6 9 y 79 9Sy..6 SS9 • �-y ,� 743 �•J 3B / . 76 22 3 ,/7 / 70 /. / 1.�o•S .93 /eJ 6 ,::)3.3 X- .1.2 9 /.29.69 .z3 9 93 zeg 8� /Z 9.5 -39 766 _98 S67 _S /! 7 0 .30 4122 -31 Z -73. g� 110,797 •9/ ZQ, -:76 Z6-/. 3-5- 1,5,1 7 /5/ 7 =93' oe;99 7 G6. 8.77 60/a. _ 90 30"3 :Z 3 20 7 -03 /Sym/.B6 139 : _ cS 9 / /-6' 7_S-2y q -33 6 z3 7 . 7 4797 7/ 20 e 76 _76 e-1z 93 6 39 �/ Z- 296 - 465- Z O 9 ZY 43,zo 68 6-.C? 3 `6 S ±4.2 Oa tE -s./ 1 3 f- • { .I j l . L.I.D. 21 - S.W: 72nd Ave. Area Ident. PRE-ASSESSMENT METHODS (Per Council Instructions 4/12/82) x No. ia. lb. . .2a2b � 96 9 7 5"2 D£� 0 7 .!7- 2Z -4�5- 2,079 4' S63 -126 334 J/3 z O .' 9 99 4jy�b'9 .3 s'9 •, � i 7_6' .3.5 . z /oma .52-5 :08 3 o 7 .! -' 2 .4W 7 X52/ .525_08 3o 7.'7S 22`/6 . y 2.4979 fUZ 40,39 . / 7 257. 39 ;7o i /03 -1.39- 17 257. 39 1920 , 70 �© 6 5' p. 3083 .10 _14/ S 3o2 ./3- 2 z sy.6.6- -2 0 /OGS v39 . 65/ 3 N .8 2 7 9 7 . y7 2 � : 7 AO 7 /off 7 3/ 2 .3 74 .93 A09 2- &97 887 . 87 520 rya . 70 262. 17& / 7 ZZI Z2 5.259 - 79 20 z 5y. r=3 -S 7d R I? .5'' 668 .0 Cf �l�S1 G 4 .8.1/ 206 3 .62 i IS 1 f 1 � 1 1 • 1 Total /530, 990 53 'x/ '/75 71/ 13� ;530 99v 53 / y75 7// Da to: Pa �- /� . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 82-x_ AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JANUARY 12, 1981 AND MARCH 8, 1982, WITH RESPECT TO S. W. 72ND AVENUE AREA STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT; APPROVING, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING RESULTS OF HEARINGS HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, a resolution was duly passed by the City Council. of the City of Tigard at its regular meeting of March 8, 1982, a copy whereof is hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full, by the terms of which the boundaries of a proposed street improvement assessment district were described, and the Council declared its intention to construct street improvements and to assess the costs thereof against the property within the boundaries specifically benefitted; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously declared its intention to make these improvements by Resolution No. 81-2, and WHEREAS, by the terms of said Resolution No. 81-2 hearings were duly called to be held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. `Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on February 9, 1981, at the hour of: 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any parties aggrieved by the proposal to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvements; and on March 23, 1981 , at the hour. of 8: 00 p.rn. for the purpose of hearing new evidence; and on June 1 , 1.981, at the hour of 8:00 p.m, for the purposes of hearing additional evidence and 'aetermining the scope of the project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution No. 81-2, due and legal notices of said hearings were given by publication in the 'Tigard Times for consecutive publishings on January 7.1. and January 28 , March 11 and March 18, and May 21 and May 28 , 1981 , prior to said hearings; and WHEREAS, said hearings were duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School at 10855 S.W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on February 9 , March 23 and June 1 , 1981 , at the -hour of 8: 00 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, by the terms of said Resolution No. 81.-2 and publication, written objections or remonstrances from the owners of now less than C66-2/3% of the property within the boundaries of said area were invit-ed, and all objections and remonstrances as thus presented prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of: .Leas than 66-2/3% of g the property in the area within the `improvement assessment district and that the percentage of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of said improvements; and ORDINANCE NO. 82- Lj Page l of 4 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 81-45 ordering the improvements and calling for bids, and amending Resolution No. 81-2 to establish a limit on the amount of the improvements assessab( and providing alternatives for construction of the improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 81-82 amending Ordinance No. 81-45 and setting the improved street width; and WHEREAS, the City Council has indicated by motion that it finds Alternative A of Ordinance No. 81-45, as amended by Ordinance No. 81-82, necessary for proper improvement of the street; and WHEREAS, Western International Properties wants the improvement extended to include Western International Properties Oregon Tech Center, the total cost of wh'ch extension will be assessed to Western International Properties Oregon Tech Center; and WHEREAS, the City has received favorable bids for the construc- tion of the proposed improvements, as amended; and WHEREAS, by the terms of Resolution No. 82-22 a hearing was duly called to be held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on March 29, 1982, at the hour of 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of affording an opportunity to any parties aggrieved by the amended proposal for the construction of 72nd Avenue Area street improvements, including the Western International Properties Oregon Tech Center, to make objections or remonstrances to the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said resolution, due and legal notices of said hearings were given by publication in the Tigard Times for consecutive publishings on March 18 and March 25, 1982, prior to said hearing; and i WHEREAS, said hearing was duly and regularly called to order and held in Fowler Junior High School at 10865 S.W. Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, on March 29 , 1982 at the hour of 8:00 p.m. ; and WHEREAS, by the terms of Resolution No. 82-22 and publication, written objections or remonstrances from the owners of riot less than 66-2/3% of the property within the boundaries of said area were invited, and all objections and remonstrances as thus presented prior to and at the hearing represent the owners of less than 66-2/3% of the property in the area within the improvement assessment district and that the percentage of remonstrances is not a ban to further proceedings in the making of said improvements; and WHEREAS, the plans and specification were on file with the City _Clerk as required by Tigard Municipal, Code 13-04 . 030; and WHEREAS, all proceedings to date have been in conformity with '223. 387 and 223. 389 Oregon Revised Statutes and Tigard Municipal Codc Title 13, of the City of Tigard, and all procedures were regularly and lawfully conducted; t ORDINANCE NO. 82- /.; Page 2 of 4 ram NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: _ Section l: That all matters set forth in Resolution No. 81-2 of• the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, on January 12, 1981, as amended by Ordinance Nos. 81-45 and 81-82, and all matters set forth in Resolution No. 82-22 of the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon on March 8, 1982, copies whereof are hereto attached marked Exhibit 111" and by reference herein made a part hereof to the same legal force and effect as if set forth herein in full, be, and the same are, hereby approved, ratified and confirmed, and the boundaries of the area known as S. W. 72nd Avenue Area Street Improvement District as heretofore described in Resolution 82-22, be, and the same are, hereby declared and fixed in accordance with said descriptions. Section 2: That improvements to the basic city standard 40 foot width curb to curb be made as follows: a. S.W. 72nd Avenue from the south city limit line northerly along S.W. 72nd Avenue to S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road. b. S.W. 72nd Avenue from S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive) northerly along S.W. 72nd Avenue to just north of the S.W. Varnes Road running east of S.W. 72nd Avenue. C. S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road, from a point just south of S.W. Durham Road, northerly along S.W. Upper Boones Ferry • Road to that portion already improved by the Oregon State Highway Division (Carmen Drive) . d. S.W. Bonita Road matching the existing improvements at I-5 and continuing westerly through the S.W. 72nd Avenue intersection. • That improvements to the basic city standard 34 foot width curb to curb be made as follows: a. S.W. Tech Center Drive from S.W. 72nd Avenue westerly to the existing improvement. Section 3: Property owner participation shall be limited, exclusive of right-of-way costs exceeding $50, 000 , to $1. 3 •to $1. 5 million, except that Western International Properties shall be assessed an additional $33,955 for improvements adjacent to their property. Section 4: That the City Council of the City of Tigard, having acquired jurisdiction to order the improvements to be - made, does hereby authorize and direct the construction of street improvements within the boundaries of the S.W. 72nd Avenue Area Street Improvement District in conformity in all reasonable particulars with the plans and specifications by Resolution No. 81-2 , as amended , and Resolution No. 82-22 adopted and hereby ratified and confirmed. ORDIN-1.NCE NO. 82- 13 Page 3 of 4 Section 5: That all lands situated within the boundaries described ( on EXHIBIT "A" of heretofore described ordinances and resolutions are determined and declared to be a street improvement . assessment district and, it is further declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefitted by said improvements, and that the total estimated cost of the project is $2,050,455, and that the assessable cost, not to exceed $1,533,955, exclusive of right-of-way costs exceeding $50,000, shall be assessed in full, according to benefit, against all lands within said improvement district. Section 6: The Tigard City Council finds that the S.W. 72nd Avenue Area Local Improvement District improvements are of the character described in ORS 223,205, and that they therefore qualify for financing by general obligation improvement warrants pursuant to ORS 287.502 - 28?.510. Section 7: . General obligation improvement warrants for the S.W. 72nd Avenue Area Local Improvement District are hereby authorized to be issued in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000. The warrants shall bear interest at the lowest rate that the City can borrow on the date of issuance and shall constitute a general obli-- gation of the City of Tigard that shall mature on or before two years after the date of issue, but not later than June 1, 1984 . Warrants shall be retired as funds are received in accordance with ORS 287.506. Section 8: The Mayor and City Recorder are hereby authorized to execute the described warrants on behalf of the City of Tigard. 5 Section 9: That inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the said improvements be constructed with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and signature by the Mayor. PASSED: By the Council, by_z„ n ,k"c u s vote of all Council members present, after being read two times by number and title only, this 29th day of March, 1982 . 4 Record- APPROVED: By the Mayor, this 2 9 = day of1982. Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 82- /i Page 4 of 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 82- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE DEFICIT ASSESSMENT COST OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST 72ND AVENUE AREA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 821), RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTIONMENT AND DEFICIT ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE DEFICIT ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Council finds that by Ordinance No. 82-13 adopted on March 29, 1982 , the Council' authorized and directed that the street improvements within the boundaries of the SW 72nd Avenue Area Street Local Improvement District (LID 821), as bounded and described in Resolution 82-22, be undertaken by contract, and that that work has now been completed. . Section 2. The Council finds that the total deficit assessable costs of the improvements within the boundaries of the Improvement District is the sum of $505,377.50, and the Council further finds that all lots, parcels or parts of lots within the boundaries of the District as defined in Resolution 82-22 are specially benefited and together shall bear equitable shares of the cost of the improvement. Section 3. The Council further finds that the apportionment of the cost of the improvement upon each lot, part of lot or parcel, as prepared by the City, 'and as set forth in the attached schedule, entitled "SW 72nd Avenue Area Street Local Improvement District, 821," which by reference is made a part of this ordinance, is according to the special and peculiar benefits accruing to each from the improvement. Section 4. The Council further finds that the City Recorder of the City of -Tigard has mailed or caused to be personally delivered to the owner of each lot or tract proposed to be assessed a -notice of deficit assessment, which notice stated the amount of the deficit assessment proposed on that property and also stated a date by which time objections shogld be filed with the City Recorder. Section 5. The Council finds that at its speical meeting of August 16, 1982 the City's final estimates of deficit assessments and all objections filed with the City Recorder were duly considered, and the City Council at that time determined the deficit assessment to be properly apportioned according to the special and peculiar benefits accruing to each parcel, part of lot, or lot within the Improvement District. Each lot, parcel, or part of lot as �desibnated in the attached apportionment schedule is hereby assessed and charged with the total sum shown on the lien opposite, and the deficit .assessment shall constitute a lien against each of the said properties from and after the passage of this ordinance and entry in the City lien record as hereinafter provided. ORDINANCE NO. 82- ").-' k. 3 MM Section 6. The City Recorder is hereby directed to enter each of the lots, part of lots, or parcels and the amount of deficit assessment against each, as shown by the attached schedule, in the lien docket of the City separate from other prior or subsequent assessments, and the same shall constitute a lien against each respective lot, part of lot or parcel, and bear interest not to exceed the rate prescribed by law for bond issues. [ORS 288.520 (2)] Section 7. That inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the affected property owners be notified of the assessment herein with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council anis signature by the Mayor. PASSED: By M ,� _ vote of all Council members present, after being red tw6 times by number and title only this /y _ day of 41„ , , ,�- 1982. City Recorder SIGNED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OFA, ,„ ; 1982. Mayor x _ I ORDINANCE No. 82- 7 { (File 0242A) / y CITY OF TIGARD DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FINAL REPORT FOR w RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION (DEFICIT ASSESSMENT) 72ND AVENUE L.I.D. Payments for right-of-way $429,554.50 Title Report Costs 2600.00 Appraiser Costs 21,861.00 Right-of-way agent costs 10,525.00 Engineering Costs 40,300.00 Interest on Warrants 14,200.00 Legal 22,500.00 Finance 1/2 of 1% 2,525.00 Clerical 1/4 of. 1% 1,212.00 Administration 1/2 of 1% 2,525.00 Closing Costs 1 1/2% 7,575.00 TOTAL COST $555,377.50 Less $50,000.00 right-of-way acquisition cost already in assessment cap. (50,000.00) 505,377.50 y $ FE A� 72ND AVENUE AREA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 021 ASSESSMENT ROLL Florence Archer TM 2S1-lDB TL 701 /S- 7275 S7275 SW Varns Tigard, Oregon 97223 2. Richard & Molly Gorger TM 2S1-lDB TL 710 3 3 3 .0 13235 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 3a BYKXXK Helen M. Metzger TM 2S1-lDB TL 800 Route R - Box 267C Sherwood, Oregon 97140 3b. David Metzger & TM 2S1-1DB TL 801 Marlene Stewart 13265 SW 72nd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Linda A. Patrick 4625 SE Aldercrest Road Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 4. Raymond B. & Phyllis G. Ems TM 2S1-lDC TL 3600 13400 SW 76th Tigard, Oregon 97223 [ Gus & Loraine Greco TM 2S1-lDC TL 100 / 7-t• 5�� 13425 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 6. William G. & Margaret Dickoff TM 2S1-IDC TL 200 :7-/ -7 Sof 13455 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 7. Paul & Lenore Warner TM 2S1-1DC TL 300 10300 SW Century Oak Drive Tigard, Oregon 97223 8. - Anthony & Karalee Maksym TM 2S1-IDC TL 400 13565 SW 72nd Tigard, Oregon 97223 9. Robert R. Gage TM 2S1-lDC TL 500 12- 01 . 07 13615 SW 72nd Tigard, Oregon 97223 10. Andree Suprine TM 2S1-lDC TL 600 :7- 8350 8350 NE Tillamook Portland, Oregon 97220 11. K. & L. Investments TM 2S1-IDC TL4500 CJ 3 7 , P.O. Box 3896 C.` Seattle, Wash. 98124 Charles K. Anderson Leslie ti. Ross, Jr. { 1 V F `1 � 12a ILC, INC., J.B. Newman TM 2S1-IDC TL 4600 7 . O 1805 NW Glisan Portland, Oregon 97209 p J s D. $ # Oregon ate University Foundation c/o RicharWady 900 SW Fifth�A� ee Portland, Oregon 9?2 4 Ron-1 Nordeen, Exec. Dir. St. Vince edical Foundation 9205 SW Barnes oYd�_ Portland, Oregon 9725 12b ILC, INC., J.B. Newman TM 2S1-IDC TL 4700 .2- 3 1805 NW Glisan Portland, Oregon 97209 '-.lames D. U Oregon-4-tate University Foundation c/o Richar -Canady 900 SW Fifth Ave Portland, Oregon97 Ronald Nordeen, Exec. Dir. St. Vent Medical Foundation 9205 SW Barnes-Road _ Portland, Oregon 9.7-225 13. Siemens-Allis, Inc. TM 2S1-lDC TL 4000 Circle AW Products Co. P.O. Box 23455 Tigard, Oregon 97223 14. Siemens-Allis, Inc. Til 2S1-lDC TL 1100 Circle AW Products Co. P.O. Box 23455 Tigard, Oregon 97223 15. - Siemens-Allis, Inc. TM 2S1-lDC TL 1000 449 .D R- - Circle AW Products Co. Attn: H. A. Anderson, etal 3427-NE-Hal-sey ?0 Port3and; Oregon 9-741-3 T16-eb D 16. Lillian Hickethier TPS 2S1-lDC TL 900 A�_O 12207 NW Cornell Road Portland, Oregon 97229 17. David L. & Beverly A. Hurt TM 2S1-lDD TL 1000 :Z-7 10645 SW Fairhaven Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 '. Northern Yards TM 2S1-12A TL 602 Waldo Stransky, Chairman of Board Doug Rosenberg, President Jim Allyn, Secretary Larkin Kaliher, Treasurer P.O. Box #23368 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' 6 19. Prentiss b .Nancy Hicks TM 2S1-12A TL 605 17535 SW Riegert'Road Beaverton, Oregon 97005 TM 2S 1-12A TL 606 6 SV, o Mfjory E. Warne �. 2917 SW Westview Circle Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 ood Chgmicaj fi?rp. TM2S1-12A TL 600 21. %T �le Cas ingg• 7330 SW Landmark Lane Portland, , Oregon 97223 Philip B. Feldman, President g6 22, Richard L. & Bette Lee Pike TM 2S1-12A TL 604 �, c1I 2234 SW Fernwood Circle Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 23. Margaret B. Weiss TM 2S1-12A TL 601 ' 7900 Callaghan Road #300 San Antonio, Texas 78229 24. Fought Co., Inc. TM 2S1-12A TL 401 29-5'0, 13 P.O. Box 023759 Tigard, Oregon 97223 25, Joseph M. Fought, etal TM 2S1-12A TL 402 P.O. Box #23759 Tigard, Oregon 97223 f Fought 6 Co., Inc. TM 2S1-12A TL 502 1 7,7-6 , 71 - P.O. Box #23759 Tigard, Oregon 97223 27a Richard G. 6 Bette Lee Pike TM 2S1-12A TL 400 3/1-7, 77- P.O. Box #23187 Portland, Oregon 97223 27b Richard G. b Bette Lee Pike TDI 2S1-12A TL 4033 y 57 2234 SW Fernwood Circle Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 28 National Safety Co. TM 2S1-12A TL 1900 Route 1 - Box 575M Beaverton, Oregon 97005 John Skourtes 28 William Flett 17655 Lomman Road Nehalem, Oregon 97135 29, Louis b Phyllis Whitlatch Tri 2S1-12A TL 2000 Z 1 6 3 ' 7 7-- 2340 Park Road Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 t Charter Page, Inc. TTS 2S1-12A TL 1902 P.O. Box #1258 i Englewood, CO 80150 Attn. Comptroller f IN 9� .31. 'Thomas M. & Riley R. Taylor TM 2S1-12A TL 2101 3134. 06 c/o Ace Electric P.O. Box 43" V1 Tigard, Oregon 97223 32. Allen P. Crombie TM 251-12A TL 2100 /911 /*4L- Gene Garoutte 14835 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 33. Otto Sorg Tv" 251-12A TL 2200 /R S3. Roger P. Sorg 8000 SW Pfaffle Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 34. , A.H.Buck Estate TM 251-12A TL 2300 1046 SW King Avenue Portland, Or-gon 97205 35,. Zel Chemical Distributing TM 251-12A TL 2400 �� C1 L• 9 P.O. Box 1123114 Tigard, Oregon 97223 36. So. Pacific Industrial Dev. Co.TM 251-12A TL 25002- 304 Union Station Portland, Oregon 97209 37. Karl E. Neupert TM 251-12DB TL 400 7 4,53 . 13 John F. Neupert ` Peter M. Neupert 1740 SW Hawthorne Tr. Portland, Oregon 97201 38. So. Pacific Industrial Dev. Co. TM2S1-12DB TL 300 3 q- 304 304 Union Station Portland, Oregon 97209 39. Simmons Company TM 251-12DB TL 100 �5�• f� 1700 Fairway Drive San Leandro, CA 94577 SEE .NEW ADDRESS!! 40. Halvorson Investment Co. TM 251-12DB TL 200 30 G/ 9 P.O. Box 111449 Portland, Oregon 97207 41. So. Pacific Industrial Dev. Co.TM 251-12DC TL 200 zt [� 304 Union Station Portland, Oregon 97209 42a. Wenjim Properties TM 251-12DC TL 100 15605 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 .' .Wenjim Properties TM 251-12DC TL 300 G -z-( 15605 SW 72nd AVenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 43. Andre & Linda Nadeau T,i 251-12DC TL 400 13 4S; 15785 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard;, Oregon 97223 tj . 44. Lynn B. & Monica McDonald TM 251-12DC TL 500 ;?- 8340 SW Ross Tigard, Oregon 97223 Donald & Rosalyn Peterson TM 2S1-12DC TL 600 24 27, 10240 SW Hawthorne Ln. Portland, Oregon 97225 46a. George H. Killian TM 251-12DC TL 700 _( ZL1 02 4724 SW Macadam Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97201 46b. George H. Killian TM 251-12DC TL 800 06 4724 SW Macadam Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97201 46c. George H. Killian TM 251-12DC TL 900 -S 4724 SW Macadam Blvd. • Portland, Oregon 97201 46d. George H. Killian TM 251--12DC TL 1000 4724 SW Macadam Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97201 47.. Watt Petroleum Supply, Inc. TM 251-12D TL 2102 (4314 . P.O. Box 0272 Newberg, Oregon 97132 John J. Tennant, Jr. TM 251-12D TL 1900 & T 16075 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 49a. Howard & Marilyn Boyte TM 251-12D TL 1901 1(74-3-7-7 11560 SW Fonner Tigard, Oregon 97223 49b. Howard & Marilyn Boyte TM 251-121) TL 1902 1 [ 5 cr,C7 9 11560 SW Fonner Tigard, Oregon 97223 50. . James Fenwick TM 251-13A TL 1301 056 Oswego Summit Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Patricia Fenwick Barrington TM 251-13A TL 1301 3446 Blaine Street Seattle, Washington 98119 51. Marjoria B. Fenwick TM 251-13A TL 1200 416 ?, 7 CJ Ambassador Apartments #701 1209 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 52a. Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 1101 Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #4% Portland, Oregon 97205 s •- f 6 D�' �� 52b. Pacific Realty Trust TM 2S1-13A TL 1103 1220 SW Morrison 11395 I°- CPortland, Oregon 97205 Attn: Tom Wiitala 41-7 52c' Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 1102 Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison - #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 TM 2S1-13A TL 2100 53a. Washington County c/o Larry Rice, Public Works Director 150 N. First Street Hillsboro, Oregon 97123Rocr e G JKrahmei`-D�"A• TM S1-13A TL 1100 53b Gary'—. 150 N. First Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 TM 2S1-13A TL 2101 54 Bingham Investment Co. 3838 NW St. Helens Road Portland, Oregon 97210 2 ?�3 • G 3 TM 2S1-13A TL 100 55. Pacific Realty Trust Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison 0900 Portland, Oregon 97205 ,6a, Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 103 Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 Portland, ORegon 97205 56b Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 104 Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 97205 Portland, Oregon 7 TM 251-13A TL 105 56c. Pacific Realty Trust Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 Empire Pacific Industries TM 251-13A TL 105 - ---- P.O. Box 23577 Portland, Oregon 97233 56d. Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 106 _ `5'337. 0 Att.: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 • TM 2S1-13A TL 107 17`� 56 Pacific Realty Trust Attn: Tom Wiitala R 1220 SW Morrison #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 -Z56f pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 108 Attn: Tom Wiitala son #900 1220 SW Morri 56g. Pacific Realty Trust TM 2SI-13A TL 109 3 a v� 9. 96 Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 tl Portland, Oregon 97205 561,1 Pacific Realty Trust TM 2SI-13A TL 110 a p3• a� Attn. Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison#900 r, Portland, Oregon 97205 56i. Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 111 03• As Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 563 Pacific Realty Trust TM 2SI-13A TL 112 l� 7• d Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison - #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 56k Pacific Realty Trust TM 251-13A TL 113 Attn: Tom Wiitala 1220 SW Morrison #900 Portland, Oregon 97205 0,2 D 57. Subotnick Leonard & Ruth TM 2SI-14� TL 1802 3• IV 7 Lottie Siegel c/o Pacific Realty Trust {! ,. 1220 SW Morrison 0900 Portland, Oregon 97205 58 F. H. Tower TM 2SI-12D TL 1800 635 E. Burnside Portland, Oregon 97214 59. Sharp Associates, Inc. TTI 251-12D TL 1200 76 q?, O g 12745 SW Beaverdam Road P.O. Box 276 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 q 60.' So. Pacific Industrial Dev. Co.TM 251-12D TL 1300 9a'�� • 1 304 Union Station Portland,Oregon 97209 61. So. Pacific Industrial Dev. Co. TM 2SI-12D TL 1100 75-6-0. 0 3 304 Union Station Portland, Oregon 97209 63. So. Pacific Industrial Dev. Co. TM 251-12D TL 100 304 Union Station Portland, Oregon 97209 �1 64.. Dale Montgomery, Gen. Mgr. TTM 251-12A TL. 3800 �7 ev7,5 Sy ClPreDelivery Service 14880 SW 72nd Avenue { Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 65. Charter Page, Inc. TM 2S1-12A TL 2700 3,31 P.O. Box 111258 Englewood, CO 80150 66. SAMACK, Inc. TM 2S1-12A TL 2802 7 7-S-_,5_ 14750 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 67. Mrs. Susan V. Rogers TM 2S1-12A TL 2800 1 3�fSg• .3S 285.1 NW Cumberland Portland, Oregon 9%210 68a. John & Marietta Smets TM 2S1-12A TL 2902 6830 SW Bonita Road Tigard, . Oregon 97223 L� 68b: John & Marietta D. Smets TM 2S1-12A TL 3000 6830 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 69. Gevurtz Furniture Co. TM 2S1-12A TL 3100 HKHYzXHHXXRYH8HK XRMK 6600 SW Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 _7( Ted Nelson Company TM 2S1-12A TL 200 y�� .3. ss- P.O. Box #23398 Portland,Oregon 97223 70b. Ted Nelson Company TM 2S1-12A TL 201 /3 3 a • 3�o P.O. Box #23398 Portland,Oregon 97223 70c. Ted Nelson Company TM 2S1-12A TL 301 P.O. Box #23398 Portland,Oregon 97223 70d.- Ted Nelson Company TM 2S1-12A TL 3900 P.O. Box #23398 Portland, Oregon 97223 71. A. T. & Doris Nelson TM 2S1-12A TL 100 7VcPd . �`•� P.O. Box #23398 Portland, Oregon 97223 72a. Williams Air Control TM 2S1-12A TL 102 S g� • Div. of Weatherliead Co. 14100 SW 72nd ,'Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 72(_4Williams Air Control TM 2S1-12A TL 10� 7/• 60 Division of Weathertiead Co. 14100 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 73. Gerber.Legendary Blades TM 2S1-12A TL 101 y0 3' 7. ys 14200 SW 72nd Avenue lbard-,,;Oregon 97223 �' 74a. First State Bank of Oregon TM 2SI-1DC TL 4100 Y9/ 7• 3 S 10888 SE Main Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 74t. First State Bank of Oregon TM 2S1-lull TL 700 S e19,�?.3y a 10888 SE Main Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 75 Joseph M. Fought TM 2S1-lull TL 900 /O U 3. � c/o T. & W. Equipment Co. 5000 SF. 25th Portland, Oregon 97202 76� Georgia Pacific Corp. TM 2SI-lDD TL 800 7313- 07 900 SW Fifth Avenue ' t Portland, Oregon 97204 6 77. First State Bank of Oregon TM 2S1-IDC TL 3900 10888 SE Main Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 t 78. R.F.D. Publications, Inc. TM 2S1-IDD TL 701 g S 7• a`.3 6960 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 �/ q 79. Ralph Leber Company TM 2S1-lull TL 702 8© 7' 7 f 6900 SW Sandburg Road _ Tigard, Oregon 97223 80. Investors Ins. Corp. TM 2SI-IDD TL 600 P.O. Box #23035 Portland, Oregon 97223 81. Assoc. Computer Service TM 2S1-IDC TL 3800 i P. O. Box #23097 Portland, Oregon 97223 82.I First State Bank of Oregon TM 2SI-IDC TL 3801 P.O. Box #22085 Milwaukie, Oregon .97222 r 83. B. L. Investments, Inc. TM 2S1-IDD TL 300 9525 Commerce Circle Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 84. Byers Photo Equipment Co. TM 2SI-IDD TL 401 A1> 10 . Lf 6955 SW Sandburg Street _ Portland, Oregon 97223 85. Timber Operations Council TM 2S1-lull TL 400 10 � 6825 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 The Tigard Mirisch Co. TM 2SI-IDD TL 500a ' 3 Jeffrey H. Tamkin, Inc. 10960 SW Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 87, CCI Real Estate Equity Fund TM 2S1-1DC TL 3702 ? c/o Jim Crumpacker 2300 SW First Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 88.' Trademark Homes, Inc. TM 2Sl-lDC TL 3701 7185 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 89, c/o Fewel-Comer Co., Inc. TM 2S1-1DC TL 3700 7095 SW Sandburg Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 90. Ace Electric Co. TM 2S1-1DD TL 1100 Z g • 7 ' r 14795 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Don & Betty Byers TM 2Si-1DD TL 1100 6955 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 91. Don W. & Betty A. Byers TM 2S1-1DD TL 200 �3 3 aZ • 3 6955 SW Sandburg Street P.O. Box #23399 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Hyster Sales Co. TM 2S1-IDD TL 1000 P.O. Box 2902 Portland, Oregon 97203 93. ' E. Lee Robinson TM 2S1-IDC TL 4200 15-6 7, 3 11125 SW Greenburg Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 94. E. Lea Robinson TM 2SI-IDC TL 4300 `� r 11125 SW Greenburg Road • Tigard, Oregon 97223 96. Margaret Custer Ford TM 2S1-IDA TL 1400 -3 7._� ie�xxxx 04 Weatherstone Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 97. Frank Weigel, Jr. & TM 2S1-IDA TL 1500 Richard J. Kuehl 6223 SW Canyon Court Portland, Oregon 97221 98. West Coast Lumber Inspec. Bureau. TM 2S1-IDA TL 2000 6980 SW Varns Tigard, Oregon 97223 r 9 BPEEP Development Co. TM 2S1-1DA TL 2100 % 7 6960 SW Varns Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 100. E. Lee Robinson TM 2S1-lDA TL 1200 ��`�• /� 11125 SW Greenburg Road �. Tigard, Oregon 97223 t 101-, E. Lee Robinson TM 2S1-IDA TL 1300 4- 11125 SW Greenburg Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 102 Steven T. Conley TM 2S1-lDA TL 1600 37 l • q'5 515 Terraine Avenue Long Beach, California 90814 103. Fredrick A. & Kay A. White TM 251-IDA TL 1700 3-71, 1/- 508 508 Laurel Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 i 104' T W L A C TM 2S1-IDA TL 1900 750• q Jay Woodworth 7420 SW Hunziker Tigard, Oregon 97223 105 James F. b Eliz. Crumpacker TM 2S1-IDB TL 1100 43 • o 02107 SW Greenwood Road Portland, Oregon 97219 106 E. Lee Robinson TM 2S1-IDB TL 1000 S �• D i2 11125 SW Greenburg Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 107. Chinook Investment Co. TM 2S1-lDA TL 1100 3 7. 46 0 1028 Bank of Calif. Tower Portland, Oregon 97205 108 Stuart L. Van Gorder TM 2S1-IIIA TL 1000 �a' ^7 7100 SW Fir Loop Drive Tigard, Oregon 97223 109 Gerald T. Harpole TM 2S1-IDA TL 900 ' 74 P.O. Box #25153 Portland, Oregon 97225 110 Zanley 6 Claire Galton TM 2SI-IDB TL 901 757o, a-7 640 Morgan Park Bldg. Portland, Oregon 97205 III CCI Real Estate Equity Fund TM 2S1-IDA TL 800 J 7` - 5,E- c/o Jim Crumpacker 2300 SW First Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 114 , L. R. Subotnick TM 251-12D TL 1801 c/o Security Bank of Oregon 15960 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 115 Smets Machinery Co. TM 251-12A TL 3101 /;L IF, 7- 3919 South Shore Blvd. Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 116 Glen A. Henry TM 251-13A TL 1700 2 110 Iron Mtn. Blvd. Lake Oswego, 'Oregon 97034 r l.. MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Industrial Contract Carriers, Inc. , an Oregon corpora- tion, hereinafter referred to as "I.C.C.", has contested the validity of the establishment of, and assessments for, the 72nd Avenue Local Improvement District of the City of Tigard, here- inafter referred to as "City", Local Improvement District No. 21; and WHEREAS, the parties are amenable to settlement of the above matter under the terms and conditions herein set forth, and to the waiver of any appeal from the Final Order and Judgment of this matter as contained in Washington County Circuit Court File No. 82-I0IOC; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between I.C.C. and the City of Tigard as follows: 1. City agrees that the following cost estimates for the improvement of 72nd Avenue, through Tigard L.I.D. Project No. 21, shall, with the exception of acquisition of rights-of-way or easements for the project, not exceed the following: Construction $1,625,000.00 Estimated Cost of Acquisition of Rights-of-way or Easements 155,000.00 $1,780,500.00 Legal, Administrative & Engineering Costs 274,500.00 Total Expenditures $2,055,000.00 If the costs allocated above for construction and for legal, administrative and engineering exceed the cost estimates listed above,--City shall bear such excess costs. City further agrees to expend every effort to reduce the costs of acquisition of rights-of-way or easements, recognizing that the costs of such acquisition in excess of $50,000 will be assessed against benefitted properties, and shared, as described below, by the City. The parties recognize, however, that the costs of right-o£-way or easement acquisition in excess of $50,000 is not under the sole control of the City and shall be assessed under the formula described in City of Tigard Ordinance No. 82-13. 2. City agrees that the City shall assume twenty-five per- cent (25%) of the total expenditures incurred in'undertaking the improvement authorized by the City for Local Improvement District No. 21. For example, if the total costs of right-of-way and easement acquisitions are $155,500, the City's share of the project would be $513,750. 1 - MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTX�IBI7 F 4; t i I i In consideration of the performance of this Agreement by I.C.C. , the City shall pass an ordinance by which it assumes the 258 share of project costs, as described above. Upon passage of such ordiwmace and the signing and delivery of the Covenant Not to Appeal by I.C.C. , through its authorized representative, this Agreement shall be in full force and effect. 3. City agrees to reimburse I.C.C. for its costs and dis- burse nts, is- bursements, including attorney's fees, incurred herein in the amount of $13,950. 4. City and I.C.C. , by and through its authorized agents Mr. Hy Sadoff, agree to undertake jointly an effort toward donation of rights-of-way and easements in lieu of City purchase l of the same, thereby reducing total project costs for L.T.D. Project No. 21 which would otherwise be charged to benefitted property owners and the City. 5. I.C.C. agrees to execute a warranty deed to donate a ten (10) foot right-of-way along the length of its frontage on S.W. 72nd Avenue. Such donation shall be made without consideration. a i 6. Y.C.C. agrees to execute and deliver to the Tigard City Attorney on or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, September 24, 1982, a 4 Covenant Not to Appeal the Final Order and Judgment of the Washington County Circuit Court in Case No. 81-1010C, entitled Industrial Contract Carriers Inc. an Oregon corporation, PlaIntif , v. City( o T mar , a mu Icipal corporat on, Defendant_. Such covenant shall be in the form approved by the Tigard City _ Attorney. 7. City agrees to accept a duly executed and completed application for payment in installments under the Bancroft Bonding Act. Such application shall be in a form approved by the Tigard City Attorney and shall be executed and delivered to the Tigard City Attorney on or before 5:00 p.m. , Friday, September 24, 1982. 8. City releases any claim that it might have against I .C.C. _ on account of I.C.C. 's bringing that petition for the writ of review. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands this_ day of September, 1982. CITY OF TIGARD INDUSTRIAL CONTRACT CARRIERS, INC. By:- ->I By: ' Mayo Hy Sa By. By �ty At orney aul %I. Rusk, P.C. Of Attorneys for Industrial- Contract ndustrialContract Carriers, Inc. 2 - MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 PUBLIC STATEMENT •. All legal controversies involving SW 72nd Avenue Local Improvement District No. 21 have been compromised and settled, it was announced today by representatives of the City of Tigard and of Industrial Contract Carriers, Inc. , the Tigard business which brought a writ of review again$t t the city early in July. The first step in the litigation was resolved in favor of the city by Circuit Judge Hollie Pihl of Washington County on September 14, 1982. ICC had a right to appeal of Judge Pihl's decision which could have prolonged the litigation involving improvement for several more weeks. Tigard and ICC came to an agreement over the principal disagreement between them, that of the total v assessible cost to the property holders in the District. The agreement between ICC and Tigard states that the city will make every good faith effort to keep assessments • against the property holders to $1.5 million, including the costs of the acquisitions of rights of way and easements. Both parties agree that the costs of those acquisitions are undeterminable. Based upon the preliminary estimates made by City Administrator Bob Jean, acquisitions could be kept at a leval satisfactory to both ICC and Tigard. In the spirit of compromise and in order to allow the project to continue unimpeded, Hy Sadoff, president of z r t Industrial Contract Carriers, instructed his attorney to cease work on the appeal. This clears the way for the city to finance the construction through Bancroft Bonding. The presence of litigation in any public works project puts a serious impediment in the way of the sale of these general finance obligations. One further important aspect of the settlement between t Sadoff's company and the city was that Sadoff donated a 10 foot right of way along his company's property abutting SW 72nd Avenue to the city without charge. It is ICUs hope that by making this gesture that other commercial property holders along SW 72nd Avenue would make similar donations of rights of way or easements r; to help bring the total assessible cost within the projected $1.5 million range. Sadoff announced that he had heard that other commercial i property holders would make similar donations if others would do so. He expressed the belief that his donation would motivate others to follow his lead. Jean stated that the city is delighted with the settlement and that he could sense a new spirit of cooperation . from other property holders along the highly controversial Lie District. "It's an unusual case of litigation", Jean said. 'Both sides won, The property holders get a very much needed improvement and people who hold Mr. Sadoff's point of view get this improvement at cost consistent with the price range that the property holders felt the City promised them early on in the proceedings. We are bath delighted." -0- lv IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 3 INDUSTRIAL CONTRACT CARRikRS, ) s INC., an Oregon Corporation ) } Plaintiff, ) NO. 82-1010C s } vs. ) COVENANT NOT TO 6 } APPEAL CITY OF TIGARD# a Municipal ) T Corporation of the State of ) " Oregon, D s ) Defendant. D s 10 RECITALS it Industrial Contract Carriers, Inc. (ICC) brought /2 this Writ of Review against the City of Tigard (Tigard) in this court on July 6, 1982. ICC sought judicial review of tt - Tigard's proceedings in the establishment of the SW 72nd �s Avenue area Local Improvement District no. 21. 16 The court allowed the Writ and required the City 17 " to make a return of the record for the court's review. 's t ICC filed its brief to support its contention that a 19 the proceedings establishing the LID were legally defective 2B and therefore should be declared null by the court. 21 for the The court heard oral argument from counsel n respective parties and on September 14, 1982 the court 2 - affirmed the proceedings establishing the LID. 24 ICC still has a right to appeal the Circuit u CCourt's decision and announced its intent to do so.. C 26 Tigard and ICC, however, have compromised their v One - COVENANT NOT TO APPEAL i i �t I I differences and have made certain agreements reflected in 2 the Mutual Compromise and Release dated September 22, 1982 2 - which agreement is incorporated into this Covenant. 4 IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, Industrial 3 Contract Carriers, inc. hereby covenants and agrees with the 6 t City of Tigard that ICC will waive any and all rights it has T to that appeal of the court's decision of September 14, 1982. 9 DATED this 22nd day of September, 1982. 10 INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTRIERS, INC. 11 r 12 By: 1 HYM SADOFF, Pre e t 14 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL J. BASK, P.C. 1s 16 ��r 1By. 7 w AU , J.1a -� Xorney for Plaintiff 1! 20 21 22 Presented by: 23 Law Offices of Paul J. Rask, P.C. • 15405 SW 116th 26 Suite 201 Kinq City, OR 97223 25 620-7247 26 Pad' Two - COVENANT NOT TO APPEAL CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE No. 82-_kZo AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CITY ASSUMPTION OF CERTAIN COSTS OF THE S. W. 72ND AVENUE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 21, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City adopted, by Ordinance No. 82-23, an assessment formula for the S.W. 72nd Avenue Local Improvement District No. 21, which ordinance was supplemented by the adoption of a deficit.assessment ordinance, Ordinance No. 82-52; and .. WHEREAS, the City wishes to assume a twenty-five percent (25%) share of the project costs of the aforementioned District; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City of Tigard shall assume a one-fourth share of the project costs of Tigard L.I.D. District No. 21, relating to street improvements on S. W. 72nd Avenue. Section 2: "Total project costs" shall include the costs of construction, the acquisition of rights-of-way or easements, and legal, administrative and engineering costs for improvements authorized by proceedings creating such Districts. Section 3: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the improvements be constructed with the least possible delay, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and -� signature by the Mayor. PASSED: By the Council, by Uy%&n_rnnti5 vote of all Council members present, after being read two times by number and title only, thisr-�) _day of September, 1982. L Recorder - City of Tigard APPROVED: By the Mayor this 7 h day of e _. 1982• Mayor - City of TigarcV " Y1HIV Tz:F 5 ORDINANCE No. r C• R RECREATION REPORT ADDENDUM Program Budget Description 1. Recreation Coordinator This cost is based on a full-time staff person at a suggested salary presented in context of other similar City of Tigard staff persons. 2. Secretary This cost presented represents 50% of the proposed salary, with the balance to be supported by Parks. 3. Program Costs a. Classes All classes are organized on a 10 hour or 10 session basis. Expenses represent contractual cost of instruction, materials, facility rental (if required). Income represents 120% of costs. b. Clinics These programs are presented as a community service with little or no income. Costs represent staff and matertals. c. Competitive Sports, Leagues, Tournaments Costs displayed represent officiating persons, games persons (when required) support equipment, facility costs. d. After School, Playground These are elementary school age progams located at the Tigard.elementary school sates. They are non-revenue programs. Costs involve a supervisor (full time in summer, partime in winter). site leaders and material costs. RECREATIONAL REPORT ADDENDUM Recreation Coordinator Job Description Applicant Requirements B.A. in Recreation Administration, 5 years experience in the field including 3 years at the supervisory level ; previous experience in budgeting, program development, and use of volunteers. This is a sub-department head position. Preference will be shown to certified professionals at the Supervisor or Administrator level . Job Description Under the direction of the Department !lead an in concert with the adyice of the Parks and Recreation Committee, he (or she) will : • Establish an attractive and successful leisure program, e Attend and act a Secretary to the Parks and Recreation Committee • Attend City Council meetings as requested, s Insure all personal and professional actrvittes. adhere to the standards established by the National Recreation and Parks Assoctation, and the Oregon Park and Recreation Society. • Insure all programs and activities meet State and local health and safety, standards. e Prepare and manage an annual budget. ® Prepare a short range and long range plan of operation jnclgdi'ng annual and capital costs. R Work effecti,Veiy with other local public entities (school , County, other citiesy. • Establish positive and effective relationships with local semi-private groups (Y`.M.C.A. , Boy Scoyts, Youth Sports Leagues etc). 9 Investigate and become familiar %,ith all National , State and local funding and grant sources. a Develop task lists for all assigned staff. Engage, supervise, evaluate terminate staff. a Be responsible for proper usage and control of all assigned material and equipment. ! Insure all programs meet City standards and policies. a Liase with other City operations. a Effect an effective public relations public oontact program. a Establish a system for determining program cost and operational effectiveness. 86/87 PARKS BUDGET CORE LEVEL I Personnel $ 64,226.00 Material & Supplies 26,460.00 Capitol Outlay 10,000.00 $ 100,686.00 LEVEL II Personnel 84,630.00 Materials '& Supplies 29,610.00 Capitol Outlay 12,830.00 $ 127,070.00 LEVEL III Personnel 106,615.00 Material & Supplies 36,340.00 Capitol Outlay 262860.00 $ 169,761.00 f k- 1 t aTYOFTIFARD January 13, 1986 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON John Mahler 2844 S.E. 145th Avenue Portland, OR 97236 Dear John: i I have reviewed the additional pages submitted by you as an addendum to the Recreation Plan. I find that these additions do not fully address the needs which I expressed in the attached letter of December 13, 1986. Please provide documentation which complies with my request as soon as possible, but no later than January 16, 1986 at noon. Please deliver the material to Billie Rawlings of my office. Since Tiilliam A. Monahan, Director, Community Development (WAM:br12309P) t i 12755 S.W.A SH P.O.BOX 23387 TIGARD.OREGM 97223 PH:639.4171 ; . December 13, 1985 CITYC� TICa�i� WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON John Mahler 2844 S.B. 145th Portland, OR 97236 Dear John: Enclosed please find a copy of your Recreation Feasibility Study as it appears on our Mord Processing system. Please review it and make any revisions or corrections that are necessary. As we discussed on the telephone, the City requests the following additions to the report: 1. Further breakdown of the June through December 1986 recreation program by dollar cost and hours. 2. A 1987 recreation program using the same format as in item1. 3. Job descriptions for employees. 4. Descriptions of the various recreation programs. 5. In the body of the report, Page 9, I would appreciate further consideration on the assessment of the park system maintenance. Please discuss this with Jerry McNurlin. Also, Jeanne Caswell of the Tigard Chamber of Commerce has offered to provide input to the study. She can be reached at 639-1656. The Council will hear the recreation feasibility report of the the Park Board on Monday, January 13, 1986. T look forward to receiving the additions. Sinker Wi1.li4ur-X. Monahan, Director, Community Development (WAM:br/2249P) cc: Jim Blaurock, Park Board Chairman 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:639.4171 s RECREATION FEASIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION STUDY Prepared by; N. J. Mahler (2226P) f Page 1 — LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Mr. Jim Blaurock, Chairman Tigard Park Board Tigard, Oregon Chairman Blaurock: Please find attached the Recreation Study contracted for. I believe as you have suggested that a City of Tigard Recreation Program would be of tremendous benefit to your community. I also believe it would be positively received when properly presented for public approval. I am at your service for personal presentation and explanation. Respectfully submitted, H. J. Mahler r _ t . Page 2 — - ro RECREATION STUDY INDEX Page Task Description 4 Forward 5 Existing Services 6 Interest Surveys 8 Parks 9 Proposed Recreation Function 12 Method of Implementation 16 Report of Conclusion 17 Appendix 300 Study 18 Block Survey 19 Telephone Survey 20 Basic Coordinator Budget Coordination Task list 21 Funding Sources 22 Proposed Expense/Revenue Display 28 — Page3 — TASK DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report, as understood by thz author, was to test the interest of the Tigard citizens in their potential interest of a leisure services delivery system. The second part of the report is to investigate the potential of implementation of a system. Because of the acceleration of the report presentation from (November 31 to October 24, 1985, some of the proposed community interest surveys were by—passed. I would suggest that the statistical results are accurate and reflective of the community's interest. I trust you will find this report satisfactory. s� Page 4 — r FORWARD The author of this report has taken the positive point of view that the delivery of leisure services is a very advantageous projection from the municipal (or county, special district) framework as for many (in conjunction F with a parks operation),ilt may provide the only positive citizen contact by the local government. In conducting interviews and surveys, we must keep in mind that the respondent will tend to reflect on past experiences, eliminating a true evaluation of possible new activities. Also, one must keep in mind that the word "recreation" is one that covers a multitude of experiences and ideas. I would like to suggest to you as a reader, that few respondents have a clear understanding of what a positive and worthwhile impact a leisure services entity can have on the community and its citizens, regardless of their personal participation. Properly and efficiently operated, a recreation (and parks) entity can be a reflection of the community's interest and a menu from which it's citizens can taste new and existing experiences from the "good life". - r z " — Pago 5 s s_. EXISTING SERVICES Tigard is a very unique community that has demonstrated time and time again that it can rise to the occasion in the time of crisis of a demonstrated need. A number of facilities and facility improvements provide mute testimony to this fact. The problem is that this kind of voluntegr involvement has a history of slowing down when responsibility for a long term or on-going task evolves. It can be said that "everyone is willing to buy the horse, but feeding him every day is not so attractive". Every area of the state can provide grim reminders of exuberant labor left uncared for in the absence of a base agency or entity. Would the efforts of Tigard pride shine if it were not for the call by the school district? A number of agency activity offerings exist in terms of club function (scouts, campfire girls, etc.) and the observation is that you are blessed with these being successful. The shortcoming is that the activities are strictly the results of establishing group activity with minimal access to non—members. Establishing activity Agencies such as Boys Club and YMCA/YWCA have a successful history of serving similar communities with quality service. Neither agency has indicated imminent plans for physically establishing an operation within the confines of Tigard. The "Y", (Y.M.C.A.) is operating an outreach series of programs in the area, most notably Y-Basketball, but it has not attracted great numbers, perhaps because of the cost and lack of face-to-face relationships. Without an in-town facility, the agency success faces what seems formidable odds. A number of government funded agencies and churches haves available many attractive offerings, but unfortunately, they are not always subscribed to; possibly due to the lack of proper or effective marketing. There may also be a reluctance to enjoin a group from a church (which one does not attend) or some concern about attending a Youth Service Canter activity which agency has a reputation for dealing only with persons who have had personal or criminal behavior references (by the way, this isn't always the case). k Page 6 — As in any community, Tigard is blessed with the usual sports organizations whose efforts provide seasonal competitive exposure. As they consist of human beings, they are subject to the same human failings as any other group faces with competition, achievement of success (or lack of it), parent-parent and parent-child relationships, and ego (coach, parent, child). Also, as with any similar organization, the work and accomplishment is usually the effort of a small minority and the history of any such group usually contains the "activity death" of many a good worker who was overworked in achieving a year's - or season's - successful operation. It is often the case that of ch volunteers find that the task they wanted to do is often neglected because additional required tasks. Members of the Tigard community also have access to a number of commercial recreation outlets. The traditional bowling alley and similar offerings til attract large numbers and the cost appears to be reasonable (qui possibly because of competition for the recreational dollar), however. the advent of fitness, being slim, etc. , has created a whole new wave of entrepreneur. Fitness, aerobic types of classes are readily offered by persons not always wholly qualified. Health clubs are now offering services, tests. and shiny equipment that professionals in the field view with concern about their need. relevance or quality. Generally speaking. Tigard is enjoying a number of rather well-run and attractive programs, but there are some questions that I will address later in the report. _ Page 7 - INTEREST SURVEYS Three surveys were conducted to get a feeling of interest in a community recreation entity. The first survey was the personal quick response to four (4) questions by 300 citizens. This was done in groups of 100 on three different days in the Tigard area. The second survey was a block survey consisting of the personal interview for an in—depth feeling by talking at home with residents of 3 city blocks. A strict numerical tabulation was not used but a list of feelings was recorded. The third survey was a random calling of 40 residences using the same four (4) questions. The results of the survey and the conversations along with the survey, indicate to the author the following: 1. The community is generally in favor of a recreation component. 2. They are extremely concerned about the tax increase regardless of benefits received. 3. They are unhappy with the present Parks operation in terms of the present condition of the park properties. 4. I sense a distrust of government in general; City of Tigard government in particular. My personal opinion is that much of this distrust is based on misunderstanding and misintQrpretation. During this brief period of time, I suggest that the community sees debate and chaos, action and leadership as dictatorship and self-gratifying. The comwnity seems to have a warm feeling for the live staff, but are very personal in their criticism of management and elected officials. 5. I feel that a vigorous and enthusiastic campaign would result in increased park funis and support for a basic recreation entity. I would also suggest that there is not enough enthusiasm to carry additional items in a combined presentation. It is with a sense of singular success that I now present a program for / implementation. Page 6 - PARKS The parks maintenance system presently is totally unfunded, therefore, undermanned and unproductive. The injestion of additional funds is not the answer and could actually compound the situation without taking some very significant steps. first. The first thing that must happen is development of a City Master Plan for parks. The plan should begin with major projections and needs without any regard for existing properties. The decisions that need to be made are: 1. What is the ration of required open space and active areas per person and per developed area. 2. Now will these be met in determining the user index for need and establishment (neighborhood, community, city-wide, regional). This includes establishing user parameter (neighborhood park serves i square mile. etc.). This too involves the criterion for indicating what facilities are provided and where. for example, a neighborhood park might provide play lots, open grass areas, a simple backstop. A ball diamond or tennis court would tend to be in areas accessible and available to the whole city. 3. The park design itself should be as part of its original presentation Include the development in a guise that can be maintained, and an estimate of manhours and equipment needs. This presentation with Council approval eliminates embarrassments such as a Summer Lake where a facility is allowed to evolve by reaction to thought of the day without any pre-planning as to upkeep capability and cost. That park is a good example where steep banks present a formidable maintenance obstacle regardless of funds available. It is noted that some physical improvements are noted without any research of need or whom the user will be (local community of City-wide). 4. Maintenance systems should be designed and costed with an obligation by Council to support the systems. Without Council's approval, you and up with reactionary maintenance and community distress which creates misunderstanding on the part of the community. - Page 9 - 5. Inventory of major users like Little League Baseball, Youth Soccer to determine their needs. 6. Inventory of all public areas, including schools to determine how these needs can be met. In the resolution of facility problems, ownership cannot be allowed to be a factor. Every effort must be made to overcome jealous public agency egos. 7. Once the Master Plan is completed with activity areas designated, the development plan is projected. Priorities are established, projected costs for new development are determined. This plan with capital costs and annual maintenance costs now are ready for Council's consideration. Council, with the assistance of staff and citizenry then are obligated to decide on behalf of the community when and if the timetable of completion and funding source. B. When the plan is adopted, it is not written in stone, but a take--off point is established if new or wiser thought is presented. A plan like this is the basis for every park request and development thought. 9. Any time a potential park property is brought forward, it must be considered as to how it , conforms to the established criteria. If it doesn't, then refuse it or change the plan. 10. There are a couple of items that need addressing: A. Tennis Courts: There are a couple of existing park plans that show individual tennis courts. I suggest that a single area be established for a set of tennis courts. By centralizing them, you reduce maintenance costs, increase usability and eliminate a give neighborhood "ownership". You also provide the possibility of providing support items such as lights, wind screen, restrooms, etc. B. Sports Fields: I suggest that immediate thought should be given to properly accommodate the local baseball, soccer and softball programs. The present situation with an outstanding diamond (Cook Park) adjoining a well—used picnic area has been a source of irritation and will continue to grind. Also, on many occasions. contests are played on small school properties whose capabilities to host a team is limited, so local lawns are being used by the public in a manner that surely upsets the owner including a seasonal tirade of bikes and cars. The solution is to commence development of a — Page 10 — City-wide facility that would house the scheduled games, provide parking, restrooms, etc. Ideally, this should be located apart from any residential area so that the noise and excitement is enjoyed only by the program participant. 11. Because of a general community feeling of fiscal conservatism, every creative concept must be explored. The use of greenthumb persons, issuing of maintenance contracts and the exploration into easily maintained parks design and materials must be pursued. 12. The hardest thing to do is to take away an established service. If you foresee a service being limited in the future, don't offer it now. Another rule of thumb for issuing of parks services is, if it benefits the total community (mowing grass) then it is probably a justifiable service. If it benefits only a given group (marking a field), then they should probably do it themselves. r- — Page 11 — s . THE PROPOSED FUNCTION In discussing the issue in the community, it is obvious a highly sophisticated leisure services delivery system is not needed. First of all, there are a number of excellent volunteer run programs operating at this time. It should not be the intent of any recreation operation to supplant these volunteer efforts. Secondly, the .ji:ration of a total paid staff is very costly and unless subsidized, would create an elite of those who could afford many of the activities. I therefore, suggest a Department of Parks and Recreation under the present City structure of Community Development. The Parks function would operate under the incumbent and would be expanded as funds are made available. The Recreation function would consist of a 314 time (initially) Recreation Coordinator (please see Proposed Task List), and a 1l2 time clerk—typist. For convenience sake, it may be found that funding 50% of an existing similar skilled staff person would be most satisfactory. The Department would be guided by a Parks and Recreation Committee (of Council). It would be the function of the Committee to set policy, establish budgets, advise staff, all subject to Council approval. The function of the Recreation Ccordinator would be to assist existing programs, coordinate existing and new programs regardless of generating agency, explore new potential programs. On several occasions, I have heard an inquiry as to the possibility of joining up with the City of Tualatin or the Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District. I see no value of being included in those activities at their tax base. I see a real potential loss in Tigard identity. Page 12 - Another concept is the creation of a new special district. I strongly recommend against this, solely on the basis of my concern for the creation of another tax base management system when a very suitable system (The City of Tigard) already exists. If concern or unhappiness exists, then the answer is to get out and change it. . . . .But I see no value in selling the car just because the tire is flat. For the purpose of thought expansion, and discussion, I •am going to describe what services should be available through the afore-described Recreation function. SPORTS t As the present youth organizations seem quite capable of handling their own affairs, the assistance would be in items like scheduling, etc. Also, the Department could be very useful in developing pre-season sports clinics and emergency first aid classes. The Department should also consider developing alternative sports activities for those uninterested in what is already available. Adult sports are also already available. The present Men's Basketball program is probably the most sophisticated league in the metropolitan area. However, it probably does not meet the needs of those seeking a less demanding regimen of competition. The potential to expand or introduce adult soccer, softball, volleyball, flag football, etc. for all skill levels for men's women's, co-ed teams is limitless. To assume that if people wanted to play, they would organize it, is to assume that because we are often hungry, we are all good cooks. A sport's council should be formed consisting of a representative from each athletic group, a member of the Tigard school staff and a member of Council. The potential of this group working together on philosophical and facility problems would be of tremendous benefit to all of Tigard. - Page 13 - � Mm- f CULTURAL ACTIVITIES An Arts Council should be formed to coordinate the resources within the community interested in cultural activity and growth. The group would assist the department in determining staff persons and program areas that would support a successful cultural arts program. Such a group might be of considerable assistance to the school staff as they strive to provide such experiences within the classroom. t AQUATICS ' 5. The City of Tigard is very fortunate in having the high school available. A myth presently exists that the pool is not available to Tigard residents who live outside the ii.gard School District boundaries. That is not the case in any way, shape or form. In talking with the School District Administrators, I find them very open with regard to the exploring of new aquatic programs. It must be assumed that very large portions of time are consumed by swim teams and school, but a very successful community usage is available. The Department should be working with the Aquatics staff in reviewing potential programs and special functions that would benefit all. YOUTH ' The Department should consider after-school programs and weekend activities for those who might otherwise not have an activity or domicile during those hours. The Department should also work closely with all youth serving clubs and agencies and try to coordinate thus prevent overlap. Ayouth council should be forired of the various groups (Campfire, Scouts, Y.M.C.A., Youth Service Center, etc.), that would attempt to act as a guiding light to youth needs in terms of social types of activities. - Page 14 - ADULT The Department would function as an enabler and encourager to our adult population in how they might better spend their leisure hours. In addition to the existing activities, the Department would introduce new activities, coordinate special events, offer instruction classes. There is absolutely no limit to the range of self—sustaining adult activities. ELDER CITIZENS There is, of course, a very sophisticated array of senior activities available within the Tigard community. The Department may be able to be of assistance to already successful offerings. - ` — Pang 15 — A METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION It would appear that the availability of funds for the expansion of Parks maintenance and the inclusion of a Recreation program are not reasonably available within the present City of Tigard taxing scheme. It is also highly doubtful whether the elected representatives of the City are comfortable in adding such functions to the community without an opportunity for their expression. Therefore, a vote for approval should be scheduled for Spring 1986 with the actual operation to commence in June 1986. It is obvious to me that such a vote would be positive with a campaign of hard work and effective planning. — Pne 16 — REPORT CONCLUSION To summarize, in very brief and specific terms, the conclusions of this report I list: 1. A majority of- the community are interested in a Recreation Program. 2. They are divided on how to support such a function. 3. The majority of the community is interested in upgrading the parks maintenance program, but are not supportive of tax increase. 4. A recreation program would be a tremendous asset to the community and would function best under the City of Tigard entity. 5. A referral to public vote should be scheduled in Spring 1986 with implementation in June 1986. 6. The Park Board should commence immediately in providing a Parks Master Plan. — Paige 17 — j l " "300" SURVEY Question Number One Do you feel there is a need for a recreation department in the City of Tigard? Yes - 140 No - 127 No Opinion - 33 Question Number Two Are you satisfied with the present level of parks and property maintenance? Yes - 109 No - 128 No Opinion - 63 Question Number Three Z recreation activity programs were available in Tigard, how should they be funded? a. Tax Base 72 b. participant or User Fee 161 C. Commercial sponsorship 41 d. Combination of the above 11 Q. No Opinion 19 Question dumber Four Would you be willing to support a tax increase for an increased level of parks maintenance? Yes - 123 No - 144 No Opinion - 36 z r - page 18 BLOCK SURVEY Discussion Areas 1. Recreation Programming Most are interested but they are concerned about need. 2. Parks Most want improvement but do not wish an increase in taxes. They feel there. is alternatives including priority changing in present City Hall expenditures. 3. Funding Most feel users should pay their own way. The concern was expressed that such a City function might become very costly to the taxpayer. 4. Other Definite alienation toward present City government. `- — Page 19 t E TELEPHONE SURVEY Question Number One Do you feel there is a need for a recreation department in the City of Tigard? Yes 22 No - 17 No Opinion - 1 Question Number Two Are you satisfied with the present level of parks and property maintenance? Yes - g No - 31 No Opinion - 0 Question Number Three If recreation activity programs were available in Tigard, how should they be funded? a. Tax Base 5 b. Participant or User Fee 20 C. Commercial sponsorship 12 d. Combination of the above 3 e. No opinion 0 Question Number Four Would you be willing to support a tax increase for an increased level of parks maintenance? Yes - 17 No - 23 No Opinion - 0 Page 20 - PROPOSED RECREATIONAL BUDGET (Basic 12 Month) EXPENDITURE Staff $28,920 Recreation Coordinator $1800 x 12 x 75% $16,200 Fringe Benefits (20X) 3,240 Clerk Typist $900 x 12 x 50% 5,400 Fringe Benefits 1,080 Part time supervisors 3,000 Equipment 1,000 Auto 1,200 $31,120 Income $ 4,225 Based on 110% of supervisors and 750 equipment Deficit $26,895 — Page 21 — R AVAILABLE FUNDING SOURCES f. t This session was not complete at report filing date, but will be forwarded as an addendum. — Page 22 — PROPOSED LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES I. Parks and Recreation Board It is my suggestion that the Board consist of one (1) representative appointed by each member of Council. The Mayor would appoint the Chairperson. This would provide direct lines of accountability. The citizenry would be in a position to easily evaluate the political persuasion of the appointee and would be in a position to determine his own political choice as it relates to this entity. At the pleasure of Council, the Board would advise staff, set program and facility guidelines, establish fees, establish and oversee the budget, react• to community concerns, monitor program effectiveness, establish short and long range goals. (All subject to Council approval.) II. Staff The Department would consist of one (1) full time director and a fulltime secretary. The secretary, in addition to providing normal typing and public contact work, would also take care of program registrations, facility reservations, etc. t The Director would, of course, administer the department. He or she would establish proper relationships with other related groups, set up programs, design and supervise facility development, effect a proper community relations program and be responsible, under the advice of the Board, to administer a meaningful, cost—effective operation. The majority of program staff would be employed on self—sustaining programs. Other staff (part—time) might be involved in other programs that are subsidized, (day camps, summer playgrounds, after—school activities). III. The Department The following is a simple task list that would properly describe a leisure services department for the City of Tigard: — Page 23 — p r 1. Liaise with other government entities. 2. Coordinate existing recreation programs (seniors, clubs, youth, sports). 3. Introduce new exciting activities for public consumption. 4. Set up training programs for volunteer staff. 5. Schedule assigned facilities. Page 24 PROPOSED PROGRAM RELATIONSHIPS Program Relationship Youth Sports Most youth sports are volunteer-based and governed by volunteer boards, It would appear that in many cases, these groups operate somewhat autonomously with little knowledge or coordination from anyone. The Department should be directly involved with all such groups, even as a Board Member ex-officio. The Department must establish such a profile that will allow recognition of an accepted City policy for service rendered, facilities used, length of season. It is important that each such group is committed to the overall success of all groups rather than be on a President's ego trip trying to find out who is the most important association. The Department will have to clearly define what facility service will be provided and insure that every group will receive the lame level. The Department should also provide training programs for volunteer coaches and officials. In light of today's cognizance of liabilities, it would be appropriate to establish a certification program whose completion would be required prior to use of public facilities. The Department should also be ready to establish sports programs that are not yet available or which might serve those not already involved. Adult Sports The Department should be available to assist the existing activities. The Department should also offer supplementary programs in already-offered sports that would tend to involve those with differing levels of interest or skill. Every effort should be made to allow groups to operate by themselves. Again, skill clinics and officiating clinics should be offered. There are two reasons why adult sports are important: Firstly, they will operate on a self-sustaining basis, and secondly, a good adu " program will provide coaches and officials for the youth. Aquatics The Tigard School District presently operates an academic aquatic Phys Ed program as well as a community-based swim team and community public swim. The District has shown no reluctance to further diversify the existing program if financially viable. The need seen at this time would be to assist in publicizing the existing program and perhaps get involved in a high-attendance summer instruction program (especially for those Tigard residents outside of the District boundaries). Such a venture might include bussing to and from the northern residential area. Page 25 - 4: 32 z. Elder Citizens A rather exciting slate of activities is provided at the Senior Center. These activities are the result of participant—expressed ideas. The Center operation should be part of the Department. However, this may not be politically acceptable. The Department should make every effort to stand by ready to offer assistance if needed. The Department should also encourage the elder citizen community to participate in general community activities so as to remove the concept of isolation. Involving seniors in latch—key or day camp programs as volunteers has proven to be very successful. The Department should also work with the Center in providing not only activity but information type programs on health, finance, food, etc. The bottom line is that the vast talent represented in our elder citizen community should be encouraged to come forth and be allowed to share with all age segments of the community. Related Clubs and Associations YMCA, YWCA, Scouts, Campfire, etc. , have provided a number of leisure time activities in the Tigard areR. The Department should be prepared to coordinate these activities and assist them to experience success. The Department should also be prepared to offer alternative if the existing activity is too costly or too exclusive. Any time an activity can be provided reasonably outside the Department, it should be encouraged to do so. Cultural Activities There is existing in the Portland Metropolitan area an unfathonable amount of arts, drama, craft, music activities. Activities involving these talents and interest are often available through other public or semi—public entities. Croups such as community colleges, private arts groups should be encouraged to offer their wares in Tigard. The Department should be ready to assist infacility scheduling and publicity. TFie Department should also display initiative in servicing talented individuals to share their skills in Tigard. It might also be worthwhile to make available a series of bus trips to nearby experiences or performances. I again, suggest that a Cultural Activities Committee should be part of the Department. — Page 26 — i These relationships noted aforehand are described for those already in existence. I suggest that one of the most worthwhile projects of the Department would be to public a seasonal activity brochure listing every recreational activity regardless of source. (JM:br/2226P) i f — Page 27 — .: PROPOSED EXPENSE/REVENUE DISPLAY 1986 (June - December) JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC TOTAL Administration Coordinator $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $14,000 Sec./Recept. $1,140 $1,140 $1,140 $1,140 $1,140 $1,140 j1.140 $ 7,980 Subsidized Playground (9 sites) $ 3,000 Supervisor $1.000 $1,000 $1,000 $18,000 Sr. Director $5,400 $7,200 $5,400 $ 500 Materials $1,000 $ 500 After School (9 Sites) ��, $1.000 $ 5,000 Supervisor $1,000 $1, 00 $1, 00 $1,-..- Site Directors $3,6600 $3,6600 $3,600 $6,'J00 $16,800 $1,000 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 306 $ 1,600 Materials Clinics Baseball $ 100 Player-Coach $ 00 $ 50 Umpire $ 5o Softball $ 100 Player-Coach $ 100 $ 50 Umpire $ 50 Soccer100 $ 100 player-Coach $ 50 Umpire 50 Basketball $ 50 $ 50 Football, Flag $ 25 $ 25 Footbail,Tackle $ 50 $ 50 Volleyball $ too $ 100 Fishing $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 Camping $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 Hunting Youth Skills Contests $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 1,000 Non-Subsidized Arts,Crafts Classes.00) $1,500 $ 1,500 Dance...............( 3) $ 450 $ 450 C00 $ 2,0 summer Sports Camps $1,000 $1, 50 Christmas Sports Camps $ 750 $ 750 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 2, 200 Excursions Outdoor Program $ 600 $1,100 $ 500 Adult Sports $ 700 $ 700 Flag Football $1,000 $ 1,000 Volleyball $ 600 Basketball $ 600 $ 1,200 Softball $ 600 $ 600 Soccer $ 200 $ 200 $ 200 $ 600 General Classes $2,500 $2,500 $ 5,000 TOTAL COST - June through December, 1986 $88,055 Revenues $ 750 $7,250 $ 500 $9,125 $ 500 $ 500 $1,490 $20,065 Deficit ($67,990) - Page 1 - MEMORANDUM TO: City Council January 16, 1986 FROM: Planning Staff The Parks and Recreation Board will meet on Thursday, January 16, 1956, to review the Recreation Plan prepared by the consultant. The Board will present a recommendation to City Council at the January 20, 1986, Council meeting. Attached are copies of letters to the consultant which address items which had not been received prior to the January 20th packet deadline. uk, CITYT11FARD January 13, 1966 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON John Mahler 2844 S.E. 145th Avenue Portland, OR 97236 Dear John: I have reviewed the additional pages submitted by you as an addendum to the Recreation Plan. I find that these additions do not fully address the needs which I expressed in the attached letter of December 13, 1986. Please provide documentation which complies with my request as soon as possible, but no later than January 16, 1986 at noon. Please deliver the material to Billie Rawlings of my office. Since William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development (WAM:br12309P) 12765 S.W.ASH P.O.SOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 December 13, 1985 CIT OF TI6A WASHINGTON CCri1NTY.OREGON John Mahler 2844 S.E. 145th Portland, OR 97236 Dear John: Enclosed please find a copy of your Recreation Feasibility Study as it appears on our Word Processing system. Please review it and make any revisions or corrections that are necessary. As we discussed on the telephone, the City requests the following additions to the report: 1. Further breakdown of the June through December 1986 recreation program by dollar cost and hours. 2. A 1987 recreation program using the same format as in item #1- 3. Job descriptions for employees. 4. Descriptions of the various recreation programs. t t 5. In the body of the report, Page 9, I would appreciate further consideration on the assessment of the park system maintenance. Please discuss this with Jerry McNurlin. Also, Jeanne Caswell of the Tigard Chamber of Commerce has offered to provide Input to the study. She can be reached at 639-1656. The Council will hear the recreation feasibility report of the the Park Board on Monday, January 13, 1986. I look forward to receiving the additions. S i nq-ere-ll-F-- - WiLLinm� Monahan, Director, Community Development (WA-I:br/2249P) cc: Jim Blaurock, Park Board Chairman 12755 S.W ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD. OREGON 97223 PH:639-3171 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council January 16, 1486 1 FROM: loreen Wilson, Recorder LL) SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Report Please bring your information from the 1/13/86 Council meeting. This was item number 5 on that agenda. lw/3585A 5: lip x g t t� ffiIffi. E l / 7= o dam' ! O L Gv E .3 s a W ~ u O q O i Z S Z v z ouc0cr LC cLM d ate ` °i co cc E fi c aV c wv+ ww ww ww w w E c V7e+ co 0 o H y M CO h C L O c Q N O y - >„ 0 Z C s c Z .. < —yio a, c h � R 0 %D wO n. o v Oc0 g C'c f'• Z Ne ; aE, �' � U v a Eo W R°G VV OOVG O 0Cp W ce V o ao XQ. V a ao •� � �. Z � � . �n o Aav ^O a< euc� •1J ^m d c � � Ln � � Ln � wCL o o ,; E c.� O <J < C O t7 a o y c v^ y of p. 7e c c v ro a 4) CCs 1_ Q o E + �' 0 � _� -' u - w z o a ® °c �^3 � c Upcin _ V G o. E W O E E _ V Ce v ^. �+ < H M ro A m Ea V `o c cZ OZato c c 67Ero uw co < c u3 ae ? ae 3 '9 o, u a o CN ? t rVZ� U� t� C�co � � aa � Z � .• � a � � wLL, $ v Q+ U CL C.O O Z U OC b L /-- F� J U OQ is 0 O ?' �•t ` <LJ r N e+i v vi o' n co o+ in VA 7_ Q < < m F-V a LAJ •tl onc, da3 vro cc u Z 3N � g3X �, �p p W LAJ ZO r ro E c Z NL a E Q H VO � `c �£ Z .� v �� OL+ CI" G °c g U E 0. m c ° u� < D O O O °" 6iQL O Qe O u c a > C1 c— vim ora = s O p �3 VA _v- � � 'N � ava oz ;E �- y w C b ai .L� ri p= r V �- �"'� f+ v r m W C, CD _ ry N 0 N O O N c = C O a ;.o <t <Eo '�' 6L. tea, W.a3 d u 1a 1 O �B N CJ.t O •C L A Ce ->. w u Q o��s 3 ~ d c 'O< W3 o •� <' w <Z 41 U mi s c 3 'o E R ° F.F C -i ami O U O E a C p E c c 0 r, b C U < < v V ® O-p w^ o0C ro Z2 Z ►• '� to �, o �, o w 3 „ as C o o u < c r o � O c a 3 �'-� V c A � �< H p. oOo �' a•'� a ACIC 4),2 a A, V o 0 �v 5 0 Z w H aO E <N c Ca, � ° y L�� y�� aEL-0 0 - � UM 0 72 of u V �v4N cQj > W= 3N 0 - ceO „ 0 _ i� °Z LL. O voocvO � �' <& t Wz VZ : O is y y-'a E y C O& ..CIM .� S t °..' a E u OEa�� a Z uuouU a ' -j 7 Cry p E'O 7 .. M :4 'n-0 4, e t r N W CD 0 0 0 0 Ln o t+1 L+1 0 0 o 0 U O O O O O N N Ci O M s < r` O 1 O a O -T O O O O -�T Cn u1 -4 til '7 v1 til %0 N d Cl %D Im °� N co t 7 p < Cl f` ( %D N c'1 %0 O .Y m O O N Ch .� N N V'1 N N O Cl O O a O O O O s W= O O O O O O O O O O O 00 �l1 U N-,. O f+ W til O V1 00 n Nl V1 00 a0 ^y i \ z 2 U a � J• O %D 00 = g i m a N O? kn I7 Ln r- Go N n cn co m O U v 1 N 47N M ID N N N ^'� o N N N u1 N .�.r wp Q V p r1 i f- cn O .D n co a 0 00 N e m < F- Z iR+ o rn i c+� rn o ao >` ON o rn v 0 c = z uVi 0 z p Gc O o O a O a 0 a 0 o d o d o G z 1= a 22,- O d o a o 0 d o 0 0 0 o O O 2 Q_ � ate. U 'af+QI<-+ O O I a O O � a 11 1 O �a ^ O N U g-r F- W S O I O O o Go O �-+ �-+ O W lm� w O N CQ d HQ+ .-r N 1 O 00 O �D N 11 00 O N O� V1 Cl Q. ~ Q O 0 f�1 �.7 �O N .--� Co �D p •-� V1 0o h ... d OV< N Lr1 N N N O c'1 •-+ M d r u'1 0 p Cl O V � �^7^�•� QzO O w O O O n t aW[►-oC 14 L`] 1 S W L9 � LV r9 L9 m l9 O W �` FW- O D 1 in p co „Z cc to; cn cn V c' O Q O a o o Q oe cn cn Ln m O -:T ISL m -7 is IT e m is o w is rn N N N tv ' Li O L FR „ _ O O O O O O c3 O O Z O OZ!O'O YO OO K O O a O O vO O0O 3 O -T o V 3 >8W .7 O a O O O Go Ln ; • o O Go co O F= cc + O O O �D N -4 M ri Ln w !L N zLN? s Q e Re S L .L e�1 N �D N el E J O O iT �� N �1 iJ •-� �T •-•� N GO .N-� x N N CD _ >3 z oC O c O O O O O O O O Cl O O Oa O O Q 3 ` Q OO O O O O O O O O O O O a O OZ o o 110r+ Go vi ui o o a+ ro o s r . o ro ori o 1� O O %0 n p O co0% O O GO N O O %D y< V VC U 0 rl �T N N %D 1- GO M -4 o N O% f- r4 0% co .7 co C u1 .7 rn N r o C v G O ••+ �D r. O� n K , y •� N N U'1 H en -IT .-� �7 ^+ N H N N N O H W -7 O W z 1►N d� u u .0 t � A z wl co cc ° a 1-4 14 a 0 ro eu z , m a u 4J o u ,p� v z W d L P. 1 O -4 0 :3 N V� v a E ;o `� _O p u 0 •a u Ir .-. 3 Is. y m +� O Sam 0 a 0) 1 to 4 _ � ,-1 ,•� .-1 Ei .-1 •.•t a ►+ a G m or Fa F-+ •�+ ��_ Qo Aj x 0 a s a co I w 0 as ,•1 ° w u co w w 0 1 u ►. .-+ rd v 1 u I of w C H N O Q v1 C w 0 0) u 6 rn 00 fr O .-1 .~s+ �„� 0 p ••-1 3 f: u oN o �+ u N ,C 16 d G -H -H .-1 �z b ,-1 = G 0 1 w C u 41 = m 0-7 W O +1 .O i+ 10 C v� a . 4 41 e w11 04 1J 0 O 7 M 00 r4 1 M iJ W 1-1 N ? z C C p M O > •c1 In -14 0 w O "-q 41 ° a W y H '2: t; 75 U =< EU c t M ^ o a O O CO N M O o O W a • a a d U _ Ln rl O cin n — z Ln 00 J N m t9. t9 IS J t900 M Ln co t9. O 00 M w C7% M 00 O V cn cn M C14 J Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M130 co U�^^. DD N an .-+ O �' �O o J J 00 a O� \\ Z Z V' J n M N J •-� O� C^- O ON 00 O Oo �D cel O O O -.0 %0 %.L) J N %D O •--• 00 J O N M M a0 U N •--� J Q� O .. \\ 1 m ` O 0 cn N rA 00 ON O% M 1 M N N .11 M .-+ +-+ .� CL`. N LM 0) CON m og Wi d O Z 2R v 1` M cn t9. is. t9 Zx �O IS N m J IM 00 O app+ U cD z O 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 00 0 O 0 o O 00 0 0 u zFa �cc o 0 Cl 0 N O N J O O r J O W N r- O O is t9 t9 t9. ti; O N OT cn 000 Ln t9. 00 � OcLin J Q.CL ~O O O Q n r: J GD n N M N �O O U t •-+ N M M N r l �D M 00 MRM p 6 CO O O O O O O O O O O O C? Y Ud � o Ln 4�pZ,:1 C) 00r- o N Z "W CK 6 O M 00 O O m t9 t9 J t9. N t9 O .-c t9 t9 O LAIW .. w w w .-i M�„� c!y dO?O M .00 Mr N .-. N C }. O O O O O O O O O O ' 0 Q O M O O _ OO u1 m O N O �D Q W p y 111 O v'1 t9. t9bc t9 c9. t9 t4 %C cr1 O tg v"1 M . W 1A %0 M +7 w M G N rl .-+ J J . S r, .w W N 1-4 CluH N . u . :...: S I.- a O O .0 ON +-1 O O O O <Z S a U = O O m Gc, O O O O z OA c d Y Zo a O w q w O o J o cn o u q O >—a; 0 t` O A G O O O 00 ►= E p 3 5+ r, is O is m to is ts. %% a is v+ is �o ism In M °_^ CL . w w i E M G0 } « ce< J m z w z cc o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 a ` p o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 000 o Oi O •o - C^ cLn cn 7 N JLn V O O+ O O G 0% 00 N C. LM O G0 t 00 cl r` r4 %n O %O �c %0 0% T-! N M %O N O J' O 0\ Y w r� Go G Ln r` % T M G f� r� u1 cr1 J �Y u1 O uc cc C uIn v 'b yj J cn wl H N 00 _ •--1 J H •-+ r� J N J en I Z d %0 M W O ` 67 Wp u w 00) Iv 19 N �° x N Cd p ad -4 44 ci O'O O a 00) Om! w 8 e0 u 4.4 W GD F .,Zy 3 � cG •o cw A�v +�+ • z u 0 a w a 60 $4 -a a w O u O y ? O a+ G O " aW H G 0 6 = O cc z 19 G R1 TO m H O 04 U— man A O O cn -a b N .O w —4 a w m r) r1 O $4 c0 .-1 O -4 W m 8 O w O 0 u c w .a w w ,-i V-4o 0 a a 3 a w ca a �� q .� m m O a7 A u u 00 •rl -rc 41 > u u U U e0 w x 3 ,-r G G 00 u G u O G w O V c y cW G O .0 00 41 a -rl G Q' O-4 O O Irl w ,, _ pfl O 0 H rl O 4 u +� n1 W Ara U d' P. z C'u1 v1 v4 O r-1 a L vl 01 eo G CIS a •� u .-+ m w ,r+ a r+ N M w E71 0 ° E .-� q ,+ r♦ o u ,1 a m r0 a Y+ - �Z i t; ' y ;✓ ea 7 < ujz CD Ln Ln Ln O M Ln O Ln O N r l7 W W O� L!'1 Lf1 Ln C� Ln O O Ln d V 9 o •may. < 00 %D Cl IS.L4 00 f- ON N N Z M N M V Ln O r+ O% Q\ O M �D r-1 N M ri Ln O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O Ln Ln 00 00 co d = Z Z Vr Ln Ln 'Tr. N .T O --T t4 00 :S;z N t9 U"L Ln cn en ,�\00 <O` O a% M Ln N Cr, �T r-L -4TCN11 H N N Meq C14 00 N I W tW-- D O U W N O N n O C m < ~ z Ae+ O Ln ID Q` GN 00 n �D M O O Q C) C z 0 W O o zpLy0 00 0 on 000 0 0 0 0 u+OC�" .r O c� .• O "" O 0 i-• a < wn M O%S V1 ON tom• 1!1 O �D .� n e d'A Q+ f, uy O N ID 1Y 00 '7 •TCl- N C :V4 0- �'O Z ORO o OO N O .4 M O% 00 N N 00 Q < id C:) O o z h, � O O ; (71 M 07{y N f•.new a W " w W 00 0 .n M OD .� OL ViZO N N O o O Q 0 0 0 0 C=) 0 0 0 0 C) 0 o Oen o O o0 Q Ln oc %D p o O O � O •4 '~ a MVD.O� 0 0 0 N .7 LS7. N �w ChMM O in 0 c i. O R G �+ Cl 00 000 p 0 0 O .Z {¢ C 4 Y OZ O a0 900 0 0 0 a ZO k Cie 14 0*1 Go CD .a cn Oz 00 M a, in rn 00 O •D N ~ *: E + M Ln a csi N %040 %D o 8 Ly E I d O QO f+�0 �O ocr CD M N M }i L ya, < s r 3 a 'y Z i occ C a Opo poo p o o a O W 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 Z - W Z D3 00 M .T Ln a a o a• o O r" < iJ O d C O O cl O �D N C c x> O c0 rr W �D � M M O �D O ae L� u Ln M N N f- N Ln O %D d wz M a •uj -4 Z U N O �_ 'O 0 s -0 •� 'Ct Q � F� rLU ca � '.% A 7 O a m u H aim z w °L M H U' H •rl H 'U Q a� H .� oup oH0 0) •� aH, u O 14 0 u 0 O m z o Lad .c w LWt C° a 0 s < air Eaa = H N .0 4 SCU o< 6 � cc 00 V V �1 U' O O 4-4 U O 6! V4 'C3 w C N Vc v W Naaw aacvw (cc L) u 0 z co ? ..SP-Q O O E+ pq L C w C E-4 .-i N M U .-L N M H W 7 U N E ° E .a •W7 > H H a1 as • VY U O d ;' < �z L 9 G =` f MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor, Council and Civic Center Committee January 14, 1986 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Civic Center Budget Report The Project remains within Budget estimates and is on schedule financially . The City Council covered the Soils Dispute unknowns in the General Fund Contingency. The Committee now needs to examine the remaining Project Contingency as to possible unknowns from here on vorsus funding items cut-back in earlier estimates (eq. landscaping, courtyard walkways, etc.). PROJECT BUDGET Revenues Current Balance (12/31/85) 688,417 Other Income -0- Interest (Jan---Mar) 22,000 SUBTOTAL PROJECT REVENUES 710,417 Parks SDC -0- ($20,000 authorized) General Government 53,000 WCCLS 140,000 ($65,000 plus Supplement II) C Rotary 10,000 SUBTOTAL OTHER REVENUES 203,000 TOTAL REVENUES AVAILABLE 913,417 Expenditures Related Costs 48,5001 Architect Fees 4,000 ($2,500 A-E; $1,500 Interiors) Construction 608,633 Change Orders 13,000 ($10,000 Paving; $3,000 Misc) SUBTOTAL 674,133 CONTINGENCY AVAILABLE 36,2842 SUBTOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 710,417 Landscaping --0- Furnishings & Misc. 203,000 913,417 1 $1,000 Misc. Legal with Soils Dispute in GF; $2,000 Testing; $35,500 Hall St. Lid Assess; and $10,000 GTE. 2 $4,000 Courtyard Sidewalks and $20,000 Landscaping using City labor = $16,284 working contingency. '< 8J:bs53 NUMN 00 ,f AGREEMENT The City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, hereinafter "Owner, " and McCartney-Johnson General Contractors, Inc. , hereinafter "Contractor, " have contracted for the construction of the Tigard Civic Center. The Owner and Contractor, without altering or amending any of their respective rights as contained in their Construction Contract, agree as follows: 1 . The Contractor acknowledges receipt of a progress payment in the amount of $ on the day of January, 1986. 2. The insurance obtained to date by the Contractor does not provide the coverage as required by Article 7 and Article 11 of the parties' contract. The Contract's requirements remain unmet in several respects, despite the additional coverage provided by Form ALS/1972 (CL 20030R) , effective as of January 14, 1986. 3. The Owner, by making the progress payment described in paragraph 1, above, does not waive any rights it has as a result of the Contractor's failure to obtain insurance commensurate with that required by the parties' contract. 4. The Contractor will obtain full and complete coverage in accordance with the parties' contract by the day of 1986. The Owner will determine if such insurance coverage meets the Contract's requirements. 5. In the event that the Contractor fails to obtain insurance coverage as required by the parties' contract, the Owner shall be -4 V entitled to withhold future payment from the Contractor and to use the withheld payment to obtain the insurance coverage required by the Contract, as determined by the Owner. The Owner shall give three (3) days' advance notice to the Contractor before purchasing such coverage, and shall obtain the coverage within a reasonable time period. i DATED this day of January, 1986. 3 McCARTNEY-JOHNSON GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. a By; Authorized Representative 3 DATED this day of January, 1986. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t R i i By: Title: x f E s t c E i t F —Z— 34 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON i J TO: Mayor and City Council January 17, 1986 FROM: Brian Hartung, Administrative Analyst 06, SUBJECT: Additional data - Metzger/Washington Square Area and Information Regarding Urban Services Study Developer Patrick Nesbit and Winmar Corp have received building permits from Washington County to start construction on a 9 floor, 238 room hotel in the Washington Square Complex. The Embassy Suite Hotel has a construction value of $13.25M with a total of 190,500 square feet including a 9,000 square feet restaurant. This is Phase I of a two 11hase project. Phase II is to be an office building of between 60,000 to iG.000 square feet. Construction is scheduled to be completed in approximately 15 months on Phase I. Correspondence has been received from Richard A. Daniels, Director of Land Use and Transportation, Washington County and is attached for your review. Mr. Daniels and his staff have reviewed the Phase II report, dated 1219!85 and have indicated problems with equating cost of service with level of service. The use of per capita expenditure, per household expenditure and per $1,000 of assessed valuation expenditure is common. The following is extracted from the PSU Study Expenditures for Urban Services in Washington County: A Bench Mark Comparison, Dec. 1983. "For the purposes of this Study, the research staff chose to use three general measures for all services: per capita expenditure, per household expenditure and per $1,000 of assessed value expenditure. These indicate the general level of effort made by a jurisdiction in the provisions of a given service." "Other problems" referred to in Mr. Daniels letter have been resolved with Washington County Staff. Mr. Daniels has indicated to Beaverton staff members that he would like to see a public forum of county-wide elected officials initiated to discuss and resolve the questions that exist in the delivery of urban services in Washington County. The City Administrator has indicated that this is an acceptable recommendation and should be a topic of discussion. BH:bs68 ri' •S:- ,l;. ''' 3 -- - .i. {' .1 - ' s �i • i .r. Y' - :Chv: ::i{`•.ti�;: ::�: i. ; ..a �•_.�1 f'T"y �•�([ ::Yt' .:. .� �r, I � .. .�L;�- ••(` t`' S, ~_ f - - •ii�/�.Q7 :•:•:•.'-:•: a '1 I' I!1 '� 1y,�M' '•if:f:t.-.•,::':til f 1: 1 . J.� 'Y[' 1 ._ .i.l'l(T'�..� ` ::.:::'.: : .! _ r:}{:vai iso->L}• }i;��•r,.r ._ �! - i r .:.}- ¢. v, tt r `105{"1 2g i�•f is � ! _ .Y. - 3 L � j• i'• SAY' E - _ .. + �':;-. •':' �� _- LI - i. .r Y i ` .. .,. I tl .•iL}i.'r.'.=;zT'.'!!?aZ ' f:• •`!:'" lt::� TUT --t '�/ (r 4 (i w . 1..11 �.� ` .' t. . t-.- `..111J: ' ' l==./`�-!•.•• y wf'_•--.� .t '•t { , '•V r :r 1 . .r4 1 i c s ! '+'^moi �: •:?::�� .f .f •1. .v t•: L= •v. 1 ••Y. w LILI ILL. , �. ;:r: :•:: :.: y 1ST •.;. :... -Y•.. :�.:•'t:.. i••.ti'C�:':.;fr} :•°{'; �i; tii:;: :✓: _ ..••:,�-:•:''i:•.: tiff•:. ! r. :y -•,� \L •'4 ••ii' .R i.. r: :u- .rl p y •r }r.. W: - •tiff { r. vI••� J:• '•Pr }•�; •7rr} ••a.•• Y. ti WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING — 150 N. FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 ( DEPT.OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION Administration 2nd Floor (503)648.8761 January 14, 1986 Bob Jean City of Tigard PO Box 23397 l Tigard, OR 97223 i At the risk of being misunderstood, I am forwarding to you an internal memo regarding the "Metzger/Washington Square Urban Service Study (re- vised)", 12/09/85. _ !; 5 This is done so with a request for a meeting with yourself, Bill Monahan and Brian Hartung of your City staff with Brent Curtis and Rod Sandoz Of County Planning staff, and myself. - The Board of County Commissioners has set as a goal , the defining of the role of county government in Washington County as their top priority or 1986. 11 The Department is prepared to assist the City of Tigard in the same manner as we are currently working with Beaverton to investigate the provision ) of municipal urban services in the most efficient and effective manse)-. Please don't misconstrue my intent. This County Department strives for strong intergovernmental relations and resolution of issues at the earliest possible opportunity. I hope you will accept this invitation and contact me for a meeting time and place. Communication and understanding builds cooperation. Richard A. Daniels Director Attachments JD C N,41u c: Donald D. Stilweli , County Administrator Brent Curtis, Planning Manager �'�qtr tFi- an equal opporrunitr enlplover t WASHINGTON COUNTY Inter—Department Correspondence Date Jan. 7, 1986 To Richard A. Daniels, Director From Brent Curtis, Planning Managerp / Subject CITY OF TIGARD'S METZGER/WASHINGTON SQUARE URBAN SERVICE STUDY - REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING COUNTY RESPONSE Y 4 t Attached is a copy of the City of Tigard's Metzger/Washington Square Urban Services Study (USS) which you called to our attention (see neewpaper article). We obtained a copy of this report on December 19th by calling Mr. Hartung at the city. It is our understanding that the County should have received a copy for review and comment under the provisions of our existing UPAA. The Planning Division has not received any such request for review from the city. Are you aware of any communication from the city in this regard? Mark Brown and Rod Sandoz have reviewed this document and have found some major problems with the methodology and conclusions, e.g.: Cost of service has been equated with level of service ° Certain tax revenues have been assumed to be unavailable to the County residents ° Its not clear if the catagorical service expenditures are truly comparable. It is our understanding that the final report will be presented to the Tigard City Council on January 20th. It is recommended that we pre- pare written comments to the city on this report. However, given city/ county relations at this time, you may prefer not to comment. It may also be useful to have some review of this report by the County Finance or Assessment and Taxation people prior to the City Council meeting on January 20th. ADe$ As a larger issue, the Department may need to establish procedures to review and comment on other urban service studies that are currently in progress (e.g. Beaverton and Portland). We will not proceed further with comments the Tigard report without your approval/direction. BC:RS:db Attachment _(� c: Mark Brown, Senior Planner a� Rod Sandoz, Senior Planner f • t 9 � . BEAVERTON January 9, 1986 b J!`AN FOR�PT\tOiS�� ! 1vtPNS N CpU . �pSN\N�jO Don Stilwell , Administrator 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97123 -Dear Mr. Stilwell : I am writing to you on behalf of Mayor Larry Cole. As you know, the City of Beaverton is undertaking an Urban Services Study in the area around the City. Other cities have also undertaken some preliminary studies of their long term abilities to provide urban services in this same area. We hope that coordination of this process will result in the cities, county and Special Districts developing a mutually agreed upon Urban Service Boundary for all of the cities involved. This would allow the cities, county and Special District to plan for future service delivery and opera- tions with some degree of certainty. In addition, this process should result in the establishment of the mechanisms that are necessary to make the long-term transition in jurisdictional responsibility for service delivery as smooth as possible. Beaverton will be forming an Urban Service Study Task Force within the next month. This citizen task force (4 citizens from Beaverton, 4 trom the area around the City, 2 City Planning Commission members and 1 Special District representative) will be given the charge of making two recommendations to the City concerning the long-term provision of urban services and the location of an urban service boundary. In order to insure that all of the jurisdictions have a forum for the discussion of technical issues and an opportunity to forward information to the Task Force, an Urban Service Study Technical Advisory Committee is being formed. The TAC will be a staff committee made up of staff members from all the affected jurisdictions. The TAC will review matters prior to their presentation to the Task Force. I ask that you desi a or more members of our staff ur 'urisdiction's re resentative to tis TAC. It is anticipat t at t e will have an organizationa meeting in ate January. This meeting is tentatively scheduled for the Hoffman Room at the City of Beaverton Operations Center at 9600 SW Allen Boulevard at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 29, 1986 Please have your appointed representative contact Larry Conrad, urban Services Planner, at 644-2191, ext. 230 to confirm this time and date. It is our intention to have a rough draft work program for this project sent to the members of the TAC prior to this meeting. Cordially, (C'L*" C>V Larry Ba�toth AssistanMayor cc: W.es Myllenbeck, Pick Daniels City of Beaverton 0 4950 S.W.Hall Boulevard 9 Beaverton,Oregon 97005 o (503)644-2191 f: ! measured ny the number of .-r- i:nes sol v(—(3 ,tit Ythz absence of .:r. iine . Citizens t_1-1is 1 , .. .1: , t;� . f .r; t til I t .-rimes have not lbeen commltted , :) :t a1 S0 : 11 tof 1)<) 1l(--t' patrols which provide them with a fig .i in•, :)f ' nus , the number c ` times per day that a patrol car .,ruises a street. moo :ri• 'i j interpreted as a measure of crime prevention or a measure of psychological reassurance that crim.> ;ill not happen , The ambiguity of this measure is further illustrated by the fact that if the number of patrol visitations to a neighborhood exceeds some psychologically determined number , citizens may lose the feeling of reassurance and begin to wonder whether they live in a high crime area . This discussion is not intended to argue that servico«; cannot be �4 measured , but rather that in their measurement great care has to be taken in the interpretation of their meaning . For the purposes of this study, the research staff chose to use three general measures for all services : per capita expenditure, per household expenditure and per $1000 of assessed value expenditure . These indicate the general level of effort made by a jurisdiction in the provision of a given service . This effort measurement does not provide judgements or evaluations of the quality of a service or the effectiveness of its provision . It does provide a gauge as to quality and significance of the service as reliected in policy decisions by a -governing board . In this Iight, effot't measures the relative level of commitment to service provisionancI the cost of that commitment per capita , per household , and per $ 10.13,1 of - 25 WAP BEAVERTON January 9, 1986 Bob Jean, City Manager PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Jean: I am writing to you on behalf of Mayor Larry Cole. As you know, the City of Beaverton is undertaking an Urban Services Study in the area around the City. Other cities have also undertaken some preliminary studies of their long term abilities to provide urban services in this same area. We hope that coordination of this process will result in the cities, county and Special Districts developing a mutually agreed upon Urban Service Boundary for all of the cities involved. This would allow the cities, county and Special District to plan for future service delivery and opera- tions with some degree of certainty. In addition, this process should result in the establishment of the mechanisms that are necessary to make the long-term transition in jurisdictional responsibility for service delivery as smooth as possible. Beaverton will be forming an Urban Service Study Task Force within the next month. This citizen task force (4 citizens from Beaverton, 4 from the area around the City, 2 City Planning Commission members and 1 Special District representative) will be given the charge of making two recommendations to the City concerning the long-term provision of urban services and the location of an urban service boundary. In order to insure that all of the jurisdictions have a forum for the discussion of technical issues and an opportunity to forward information to the Task Force, an Urban Service Study Technical Advisory Committee is being formed. The TAC will be a staff committee made up of staff members from all the affected jurisdictions. The TAC will review matters prior to their presentation to the Task Force. I ask that you designate one or more members of your staff as your jurisdiction's representative to this TAC. It is anticipated that the TAC will have an organizational meeting in late January. This meeting is tentatively scheduled for the Hoffman Roan at the City of Beaverton Operations Center at 9600 SW Allen Boulevard at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 29, 1986. Please have your appointed representative contact Larry Conrad, Urban Services Planner, at 644-2191, ext. 230 to confirm this time and .date. It is our intention to have a rough draft work program for this project sent to the members of the TAC prior to this meeting. Cordially, Larry Bauer Assistant to the Mayor Y City of Beaverton 4950 S.W. Hall Boulevard ® Beaverton,Oregon 97QO5 ® (503)644-2191 Mi MORANDUM CITY OF i LGARD, OREGON F 10: Mayor and Ci.t.y C.ourrc i 1 January 14, 1906 FROM: Brian Hartung, Administrative Analyst (�J' t SUBJECT: Metzger/Washington Square Urban Service Study This is Part II of the Urban Services Study of the Metzger/Washington Square Community. Included in this report are the expenditures survey conducted in Part I and further study of demographics, revenues and capital requirements of the study area. Staff has also researched the leges]. procedures and time tables required if' annexation is the recommended course of action. Points of interest in the report are: t o The area consists of 1.5 square milcas of land with approximately 6,000 residents, 2,500 dwelling units Arid an assessed vaIuat.ion of $244,599,000.00. c o I:f annexation is recommended, it could bo completed no later than } November 5, 1986 with revenues phasing in between December, 1986 ,,and July, 1987. ! o Six special districts operate in the area providing fire, wAt:er, wastewater, and education services to the community. 1 o The population of Metzger- is quite similar- to the City of Tigard population while housing stock is older aril on the average assessed $10,000 lower. o Metzger/Washing Lon Square currently receiv(2s an expenditure effort of approximately half that of the City of TigArd on -A per capita basis. o Assessed Valuation of the study arcs;. is $744,599,000 with Washington Square accounting for- $82,447,000 of Lhat total . o Seven utility franchise~ oporAt.e in Lho Larva and would gerier•af.e an estimated $320,000 in reveriians. o Approximately 401 acres of r•osidorrtiAliy zoned And 18 -Acres of commercially toned variant: And/or• buildabl.o land is in the study arra. o City of Tigard would gk nerato :approxiursrto[V $100,000 in foes aril charges revenue, oqui v,alont to Boavrr-ton uuL t/6th of what the Ci Ly of Portland would rec:oivo. o Total. generated revenuo would bo i.rr the ar•c-!a of $900,000 wi.Lit approximately 75% nonproperty L;itx rcalaLed. o Approximately $1.5.6M in capit.A]. expendi.Lures are required in the area with about $1OM of that: Legal fa 1.l irrq_ urid(4r County or SLate jurisdiction. 811:bs54 4 ME11GER/WASHI:NGWN SQUARE URBAN SERVI.CE-S TABLE OF CONI ENTS 1. General Background 1. 1 Study Area/APAA 1.2 Process and Legal Requirements 1.3 Time Line 1.4 Special Districts 1.5 Metzger Park LID 1.6 Demographics and Population 1.7 Washington County/City of Tigard Expendituros Survey 1.8 Tax Rates 2. Resources 2.1 Assessment 2.2. Franchise Fees 2.3 "Abandoned" Revenues 6 Entitlements 2.4 Vacant and Buildable Lands 2.5 Fees and Charges 2.6 Revenue Estimate 3. Expenditures 3. 7. Capital Needs Assessment 3.2 Operations Costs t 4. Appendix \ 4.1 Expenditures 4.2 Revenues 4.3 Methodology 4.4 Bibliography BN:bs3 1 1.1 STUDY AREA/APAA The Study area consists of 1.5 square miles of unincorporated Washington County north of the City of Tigard City limits and bounded by the Multnomah--Washington County line on the east, Taylors Ferry Road on the north, and State Highway 217 on the west. The area has an approximate population of 6,050 residents in 2,500 dwelling units with an assessed valuation of $244,599,600. A largely urbanized area, Metzger, is primarily residential in nature with commercial properties dominating the Washington Square area west of Greenburg Road. The infrastructure is in place with the only major concern being local roads, many of which have not been accepted by Washington County for maintenance. Under a joint resolution between the City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard that established an Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA), the Washington Square complex west of Greenburg Road is considered a mutual study area and therefore has been included in this study. The Metzger Community lies within the Study area, east of Greenburg Road. Primarily residential in nature, it contains approximately 97% of the population and dwelling units with a assessed valuation of $162,152,000. Urban services are currently provided by Washington County and six special districts. Washington Square, the commercial complex west of Greenburg Road, has approximately 150 residents with an assessed valuation of $82,447,000. The area is primarily commercial with a transient population of an ( estimated 32,000 per day (average) and in excess of $200 million in annual sales. The Golden Key Apartments and approximately 13 acres of dedicated farm land on Hall Blvd. are the only non—commercial uses in the area. Washington Square Wash.Sq METZGER METZGER POPULATION ASSESSED VALUATION 2 = : t' •-- a i . 3 _111. -qtr. �r _ `•.......:,:::::::. •::: ',max .n �;��li.'4:L .t } il:-j l•J ;, 'L.�+1. „� 'j';;:'F�rvi:v...�.•• _ fi_:r;�• ,•.i*�-- Jh•.r•. sln .'�i':.'. it LIF] 41 rl cr ui ir;:;::'r,{:w •.r.•{ti 1, t.�` •J.. �. t 1 � i i' ;�:��.'y;�':?\:�h'�•+;'.:e:•:.::•::.�.. .•f:•:: �jE :�: >�� .i. .r. k 5 t fi !- r _ �i 1 + , :;•:.•:::: •:%�+� (tom� tj;`.�>;3i•::,.. i::r�f:;i:; .:�l l�; -�i�a�. ,lI- 'Y 1 t,r a• — �~ �'Y:� •.i:•�:{•::'. ':;.l:ii.^" '{•• :7ti.� {'=�' '`•l: -N:�+• • -- U�1•.1 x.1..1.lJ i �. •.{•T^:�':::.. ::({::��:$, 1 r �..•, .r• + - r T•- .•1 I is iti��':;: :•J.•..Y}::::::::•::v:�}:•:Y.. �j ;:•� .�•`.' �:�'.:!r a.'.. 1 r ,*.�F 'S -r -�.f' i t r.. T r r S -.:..,' y„/1 ^'�'1-'.'�r3t?`::.. ';.`•:`•,,' ':�•v:� �-1.- a t.. �y 1., . r �•i r'i �~ >J.•:ii:�::..: ,.L•�{�.•;•;1;:;- - Q 7 �. a ..� t i, F — i �'�� ,t I + t 3 _' r-�i< '`•',Y ?s'i':*- � '�� •'' 'iJ_.�1 . a 1' R ' L:: ' r i r i_ �t.' F ' f c tir•T rr ia.•, I �..}} _1}i::�'• :• �- ;fir-:�,�-r��'T � , �r- `, I �>' l.! �i ,i �t -� ,r '^1 r_T l .. � � ++ �-r�` r�-.' 'r �':'•' C', ': 3r � t - � r- t Tr r ,i<!' •r�•J.1 ITt -J t.r `• }'. O h1� l P •P. :Y t ? tr t rc cr IL O •jr••i v j#� �t f :�� '-1 i, ~�..,,ti 'T"l'_!�� ..�'.:.� , .1 i ' J j:'�1_;-�r''� F' J :Oji.•,:: z a:'{'• L';} ��r i61�'T.1 1 ri(•.t "' ..+.I-�1 '-t _. Irl - r -,� t+r f rj1,.+� >.ty --7,•!'•'•',•' _I .f 1 �. . •.:: •.: k .r:: `�+-•-� � .f7.ra.�., - a ram, r�r a:T r.�- f.•'C:� - - rX. In ri LLJ 'C '•�' :•''� �.•aatrJt t M��.�Y� !t. .. �t. __� _�: `�, +{L� � .t�:'•:ri'y;�1r,-:. '',i•�r-`:r..i.:_z'�` uj _.1 {•��::.�g 1 �_ - -- rr {�� l i1 1 t •?. Vit`.`'.. J y .Y Y t. ..9•}f f� �{ J... i :r :i. n• •r Lj i .w41 y .r :• . ''ti::i;•..fir � 1 '.�'.?`: •'•'^"• r-vr:::::f , '•a.•.•: ;e.v' r - >i.a.:•.Y.j;?{:: :•;:. .fi..::•;;: ::•:r..,;,{.!......:.-. 'r.'t':•' {: b�� ,•: �:;•_ ::•: •.{:, fit :c •Jw� ......... ''•'tr" ..... •.?(•:>�: .'_ivy;-}; �' tiiC.'. :�1;•;y'::J:::X;:-.:`• ''''''::•:':.•.::•:':.:.J \,,,,. •t.,iD. '': :t:•. art:•:i% v:•a' } '•Y Y�. y 1✓ :l- •v: j l• :> •Y. V L• ;{ 'gyp? :.:•:•:+. ;;�'::..t.. Y M•• !. LL .l. 'rr• •:•. !J. •.. .RrP r �.17P 1 �a. r• ✓• 'vrs:• {i J: •v• x' Y r• •'L' t x. _ n- .r �. ''{� :::•:�::: Citi::::'r ;: : :;:; :;. ::�_ :i r 1 Y L/ draft of 10/28/85 CITY OF 1'LGARO, ORKGON RESOL_U1I0N NO. 85-82 A J01NT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAVERTON AND THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AND SUPPORTING MUTUAL ANNEXATION PLANNING AREAS OF AGREEMENT (APAA) . WHEREAS, the cities of Beaverton and Tigard find that municipal urban services can be provided most efficiently and equitably by cities; WHEREAS, conflicting land use plans and overlapping areas of planning interest tend to delay the ultimate annexation to cities and tend towards illogical and inefficient service boundaries; WHEREAS, both cities respect the rights and preferences of property owners and residents to decide when to annex to a city according to State Law; and WHEREAS, both cities see competition and conflict between cities over individual annexation proposals as contrary to their mutual long-range community interests and wish to avoid such conflicts whenever possible by mutually adopting a clear statement of areas of annexation interest . NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Tigard City Council. that: 1. A joint Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA) hereby exists between the two cities; 2. The South Beaverton-North Tigard boundary on future annexation areas of interest as shown on the Map (Attachment A) shall: begin East at the Multnomah-Washington County line; Westerly follow Taylors Ferry Road and a line across to Oleson Road; Southerly from this point to Hall Boulevard; Westerly along Hall Boulevard to the Hall-Scholls Ferry Road intersection; from the Hall-Scholls Ferry intersection a mutual study area exists for the Washington Square area bounded by Scholls Furry, Highway 217, Greenbury Road to Hall Blvd. and back to the Hall-Scholls Ferry intersection; from there Southwest along Scholls Ferry Road to the Old Scholls Ferry--New Scholls Ferry Road intersection; continuing Southwest along New Scholls Ferry Road; to the Urban Growth Boundary; 3. The cities declare and support Beaver ton' s annexation interests North and West of this APAA Boundary and Tigard's annexation interests South and East of the APAA Boundary; 4 . The cities mutually agree that upon request from the other that they will. support annexation proposals to the other consistent with the MAA Boundary. The cities mutually agree that t.ttey will riot approve annexations to their city contrary to the APAA without a resolution from the other city supporting such an annexation and specifically modifying any departure from the APAA Boundary; RESOLUTFON NO. 85-82 Page 1 4 5, the cities further resolve to generally support annexations by the other (given away from the APAA Boundary xrt!,As and to further develop a joint annexation policy statement in this regard; 6. The cities further agree to a joint staff review and mutual Council approval of the Murray Road cornnection through the Old-New :;cholls Ferry Road area from Beaverton southeast into Tigard. The cities agree to revise and amend other planning agreements consistent with the APAA resolution. PASSED: This Q�U \ day of �iG� ob Qr 1985. ihr.-F. Cook, Mayor ATT 'T: !. Loreen R. Wilson, Recorder (BJ/lw: 1037p) C. RESOt.UTL'ON NO. 85-87. 5 K Page 7 1 RESOLUTION NO. 7 A JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAVERTON AND THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AND SUPPORTING MUTUAL ANNEXATION PLANNING AREAS OF AGREEMENT (APAA) WHEREAS, The cities of Beaverton and Tigard find that municipal urban services can be provided most efficiently and equitably by cities; and WHEREAS, Conflicting land use plans and overlapping areas of planning interest tend to delay the ultimate annexation to cities and tend towards illogical and inefficient service boundaries; and WHEREAS, Both cities respect the rights and preferences of pro- perty owners and residents to decide when to annex to a city according to State Law; and WHEREAS, Both cities see competition and conflict between cities over individual annexation proposals as contrary to their mutual long-range community interest and wish to avoid such conflicts whenever possible by mutually adopting a clear statement of interest. £ BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Beaverton, Oregon: Section 1 . A Joint Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA) hereby exists between the two cities; Section 2. The South Beaverton-North Tigard boundary on future annexation areas of interest as shown on the Map (Attachment A) shall : begin East at the Multnomah-Washington County line; Westerly follow Tay- lors Ferry Road and a line across to Oleson Road; Southerly from this point to Hall Boulevard; Westerly along Hall Boulevard to the Hall -Scholls Ferry Road intersection; from the Hall -Scholls Ferry intersection a mutual study area exists for the Washington Square area bounded by Scholls Ferry, Highway 217, Greenburg Road to Hall Blvd. and back to the Hall-Scholls Ferry Intersection; from there Southwest along Scholls Ferry Road to the Old Scholls Ferry-New Scholls Ferry Road intersection; continuing Southwest along New Scholls Ferry Road to the Urban, Growth Boundary. Section 3. The cities declare and support Beaverton's annexa-- tion interests North and West of this APAA Boundary and Tigard's annexa- tion interests South and East of the APAA Boundary; Reso. No. -2& b _s w Resolution No. (0 V-7 Page 2 R Section 4. The cities mutually agree that upon request from the other that they will support annexation proposals to the other consistent with the APAA Boundary. The cities mutually agree that they will not approve annexations to their city contrary to the APAA without a resolu- tion from the other city supporting such an annexation and specifically modifying any departure from the APAA Boundary; t Section 5. The cities further resolve to generally support an- nexations by the other even away from the APAA Boundary areas and to fur- ther develop a joint annexation policy statement in this regard; Section 6. The cities further agree to a joint staff review and mutual Council approval of the Murray Road connection through the Old-New Scholls Ferry Road area from Beaverton southeast into Tigard. The cities agree to revise and amend other planning agreements consistent with the APAA resolution. Adopted by the Council this 21st day of October, 1985. Ayes Nays v Attest: Approved; N CY WILCO City Recorder./ LAR COLE, Mayor t yy: 44 4 Re So. ►l4. �� L= ' 77 fir:. i �'� k ;:.;;:-r :t•, :ate• ii i: .0 .xp:��'x,4':i•''•' _ 3 My t'�;�•jj.Q�11 _M .,•�• '1` 1 , ��• 4 •:v:::� _�1: t LS ��•�.�(y\' \ \' ,� ! �\ •tit ♦T 1 I •� .. ...... �•• , _ ff�i AM ...... FT i•:�- .tiff•: :'�` 1'_.+y -•/ - !. '•r r , i' L rt t y 1 _ T it •��: •:r'r _L_ ��'-� +.�'I� -$�.✓_' � i - tt' Yom`-' ,:�r�'rw:•:•:•••:•:' � ��• ••' MT's 7 -- AL1. i � l., is :�;:•:. 1 f•. t 1 •3 E ]]�'r�• {•.. _{.^ rr�. i� .ri (1• �• I _.�l~i_i' . .. . :J.. , __. . �R. -� .^x:•:.: '•�- T is :�� '•i::.L' _��"}�- f •.i �-[ _. _ .•/L1_ .. i J - •'. :•i v: T-l`�1 rtT1 _ �1-��-� 1 ,.{-- .: ,::':•;i+'r?i';e;`;:TT.-'.•. ...i..; 1 1.. :;::#}}; :;ijw � -� ' `lii -rFE r 1r,ti '� �EI. ! u_. -Tst, ( • . :` ,..�� ..'1.,..x ....• T t r TT T r r r I 1 4 f• `r 1 (T j 7 T f..` } 1'f.. •t h 1 } -� -� '1 L�'.�. F.r}(�fi. � - '_.' __.:': Cf`��•�'y:,'J��iJ{;:r:�:'.��'•-:�:_:'• Q :: 1 �:;�:;:(: r.•7 C.l• � t_.j r' � ,i� �;t -'. i ] �} r .1. , t � i F-._�•�•e �� .3 Q } 1 r n l ) i l� }V •. :=hYFn . .. 1 t _ 1 _ l _i ff i. ± ,1 t.,,., 'NS -. � 3: .,'F:• •''f r_... t t _ r�rT ar r - .T r T r r l ra s i t r� .+'�:}•:.•: i 551 .mow•:�: ':t`:'::•'.• `-I r H^ .� - !y..• T'; ,r 7 111 LLJ {f ! T -rT— LLJca9 ! i}::i-s � , t , T" �r 4-...t y � t +, - ---,. :.I Y..1. •L•:�:' w� ¢ },}:.t;1:;.?'. '.S`.: .:;j:'+}"' :{T{ 1*a-{71 I .,�."�7/ L ='• }R� __ t.�.. •�..'�' '•:e':ti.:•l u' 7'-�f` :I-�"1.1. y•_ -_�j{r��_i- _�G:v':.?\I.r f' Yw�`��w:::r••'w-_..'_�'� ;k�t--Y'�... . ! .L p .... - �. E Q �. jv:� :��'.• :E �1A _j� a r-.r t.�.-r-'-r_: :'r• w�•. _-_-�- : T��,..':w! •.' F•'1 4 l: •.;•` • ;a //L_. I �.J l.J....J - • _1'�._-Lw'i.'.':':.'.'.�'.•.'.'. .:.:;:':: �1'�•rJ' .;r.. - '?-1Y t-I '-�-i ••1y'�'F. -:.-1. is _ "� •J.':-i':•'=� •�;''''� •+t -i�-1 L - - _ 1: ` --- "T :�� :�.. ....... .., 1, _1 i- i :•�:. -+� ({t _ "'T~f.vsr.1,R '.C•i•:.:<.•C };{i: �.. jr••T�77 j` .'3' raL.t"','f J' t .•r o. f, r:. :t }► _ J .�i .l _ 1 .•tax-:�: _:;:• }::::.:;r.y�;:.•:.•.�:�:•'r:-. 1 'l :��r--- '-{�' :�. •�e' it •.7-: •'i:':','.t.a:.:�.;.: } ;:.:v>-x v. .��.•}i::{.•�+ ...... .?`yri•: r::•.••tt./ �,r�i• ''t v. Ile �. ............... •:L {t,rr 'fir. - >Yy :Y •:1 •.R _ L N { .•:V•J•Y:•: �l.':':'.':.':.'.•..::. t S r: r. { :•r .1 ) .icl.. .r- iI / •.YA••• r r ,• }(. Y .Tr.•. Q •1 •r•••4 ♦ ]} y�. r �i rr. •'h. r." .•I. L'' r ;: �•_ '•3 �v rrr 'v 8 1.2 PROCESS AND LEGAL REt;UIRE_MENYS The authority for annexation, of contiguous Ler•r•i.tory to a city is outlinred in ORS 222.111 and may be initiated according Lo ORS 199.490 as follows: (a) By resoluti(.)n of Lhe gover-nirig body of Ott! affected city (City of Tigard), or (b) By petition of 10% of registered voters in the affected territory, or (c) By petition signed by owners of at. least one--half the land area of the affected territory, or (d) By resolution of the Boundary Commission, or (e) By resolution of the governing body of the affected territory upon receipt of consent to annex in writing from more than half of the owners of land who also own more than half of Lhe land representing more than half the assessed valuation of the territory to be annexed. 1'he petition or- resolution shall : (a) natne the affectod city and state it is proposed to annex, and (b) describe Lhe boundaries of Lhe *ffircLvd territory, and (c) have LLLachod a county as5essor•' s cadastral map showing thra location of the affected territory, and (d) be filed with the goundary Commission. Upon receipt of the peLiLion the Boundary Commission shall cause a study to be made of the proposed anrioxaLion and conduct one or more public hearings on the maLLer. After study and hearings, the Commission ma_y alter the boundari.os (if the proposal t.o either include or excludre territory. The noLice of hear irr�j shall bO irr accordance with OWE 199.463 . The Boundary Commission shall i.ssuo A final order , stating the reasons for thp docision approving or di•.Hpproving, on the annexat:ion issue within 90 days after Lhe petition, resolution or- application is filed unless a posLponenrent. is Agrc-od upon by the part:ios at the hoar•ing The postponement. shill I not. 1- for a prr iod c•xr:trer.linq one year from t.ho dale of filing. Judicial reviow of Lhe order is r orrl'err-ed upon the Cot-Irl of fippeals under ORS 101.482. (ORS 199.461) . If the proposed arinexaLion is appruvod by Lhe Commission, the final t ordrar shall. be effer.;tivra Al,. Lhra henna spocifiod in the final order. if no effective daLe is specified, Lht order shall Lake effect 45 days after Lhte Comnris5ion :+dopts Y.hr� fin.at ordcr. 9 The change shall not. take effect unless approved by the electors if within 45 days after the date of tht! adoption of the order : (a) Written objection to the change by not less than 10 percent or 100 of the electors registered i.r: the affected ter•r-itory ar-e filed with the Commission; or (b) a resolution objecting to the change is filed with the Commission by the affected city. If objection is filed by the City Council , the Council shall call for an election in the affected city. If objections are filed by electors of thio affected territory, the Commission shall certify the fact to the County Board of the affected territory and the County Board shall call for- an election. When the minor boundary change has been initiated by resolution of the City Council, the cost of the election stall be paid by the affected city. The election shall be held un the next appropr•iat(t election date as authorized under ORS 203.085, 221 .230, or 2')5.345. The City Council or County Board shall certify the results of the election to the Commission. If a majority of voters approve the change approved by the Commission, the Commission shall proclaim the results. Upon adoption of the proclamation the change shall take affect. (ORS 199.505) 10 -!1i11 VI If1N fi, CII* L'J:IN(!t iNht rA:f:IN='«Ulf'. t!U uI1N tl0UN0ARt tow, Y DA., tlWNDARr COrrt. SIVOr ANO MI ARIhG BCUNfARt '.Gwt 1 SS I ON APPROVEI APPROVt DISAPPROVE L':SAPVRQYF Aj',Al CMU 0! ;iBJt C I lU'! PROCf hti up.Ji C7lCr/ PtRID, UBJi tJ IOk SS f EOuloo ftw(RV (Cesserj BGJNOARr tONiS, 401!CE 1t ORDER ElNAI `OUNIY, AMO iltLO PCF EaECtION ORS E99.A411SS ORUE 1+(U tlNf FEW{FtN[NtS. G! (=Atj PR tMARr/GE hE RA; ' /// to hirti utn(R ftf(tl(,. ti EC!IJN .ECD 1% Afif(Ito +!S ffwmot , NO ((Mf I SS t(1N "Rkt AIN th 'if A-M AAt ION PX pI f SS 1RE SUE UtI'lYi t:,t AW.1 AtlSiRA ' ylln SEC... ANNi-Att(p. W!n Ciir :I!r I.OUNC it Algwl uF SOL U!ION sr,.Aug TO BOIWUAAr CUrsr. F flit .iln F01!NUA., :7*+I SS i(:h APPON,I N4Al%0A4i 6 J f i i 9t i i t 3 i f 4 A n 1L 1.3 TIME LINE The coordination of activity concerning the annexation proposal and knowledge of deadlines that must be met are essential. outlined below are target dates for the annexation process and estimated follow--up dates to establish a time table insuring that all parties involved are aware of when certain activities are to be initiated and/or comnleted. 1.31 Annexation Time Line Assuming that the September 16, 1986 special. election is the target date for a Metzger/Washington Square annexation vote, the following deadlines apply: o City of Tigard Council April 21, 1986 Nearing on Metzger/Washington Sqaure Annexation Proposal (no later then) o City of Tigard file April 25, 1986 resolution with Boundary Commission requesting Annexation (no later then) o Boundary Commission hearing May 29, 1986 on Annexation proposal. o Boundary Commission effective July 13, 1986 date of Final Order of Annexation (( (If approved, no objection filed) 4 o Boundary Commission certify July 31, 1986 objection with Washington County Board of Commissioners (no later than) o Washington County Commissioners August 13, 1.986 Order election in Metzger/Washington Square on Annexation issue. (no later than) o Election on Metzger/Washington Square September 16, 1986 Annexation issue. o Washington County Election Commission September 18, 1986 certify election results and forward abstract to Boundary Commission. (If approved and no reconciliation required. ) C% 13 The following dates are dependent upon the September 18, certification of election. o Boundary Commission Proclaims September 18, 1986 Y results of election and forwards notification to Secretary of State o Annexation of Metzger/Washington 1 Week Square final upon receipt of notification by Seretary of State o Center for Population Research and 4--6 Weeks of the Census conducts census of Metzger/ election and Washington Square and forwards annexation certification of population to Secretary of State. o Notification of Utilities 30 days after o Initial receipt of shared revenues November- or based upon new population December 1986 4 14 ri a 1.4 SPECIAL DISTRICTS Currently, six special districts serve the Metzger/Washington Square community providing education, fire fighting, water and wastewater delivery systems. 1.41 Education The majority of the area is served by Tigard 'school District #23JT with Beaverton School District #49Jf serving the Northwest corner of the Washington Square complex including the Golden Key apartment complex. 1.42 Fire Protection Washington County RFPD #1 is responsible for fire fighting in the Metzger/Washington Square community with Tualatin RFPD responsible for the area south of Spruce Street and east of Hall Boulevard. 1.43 Water The area is served exclusively by Metzger Water District with delivery contracts for Bull Run water with the City of Portland through the year 2000. 1.44 Wastewater The Unified Sewage Agency is responsible for the wastewater system in the area. The Washington Square Complex has its own collection system with discharge into the USA Network. 1986 PROPERTY TAX RATE 13.25 1 a x 2.65 2.60 .95 36 r r _ N O R N N OC Fes- 15 l T� 4 v: r+ - I G lAll -t- •6 •��, :ter•:• •• '�•• T �'T' ! 'i t�. -LT '':' F 1 •s� 1 f :r , F•' 1 . r- � .1 ci F.J1. T+ - r LL T r ;`:• �,-j�_ .�1_�_�..�.i L .1._t_t-'1_�_ _i:r ;?,fit'. .... ............ } r T4r H T—jR i Lh It 74 •. _ f 11 j .. rr HT "X. ------------- Lir• •.�::•.'•: a��; � ' �� --? �r� � =`�� v „r•}: r :: i� r - Mito • tkl R , _ l �_ 1. � • .�,,: :'•i. Y � :f PW :�i. �?��i(�•�� - '•�:r.76•'r :•7 •:{•: tip:%,-:::%::::%::• •,f ��t •.'sem '•A N r X• •ti• is c• :•}.•:::.r::• .L. 16 "1 r N moi' t -t T•: i T' I - H1 -�-1-t ti»r 1"T j 1� . -� F- r i<{w wi i�rT� }� .• • .j.'• _ Vit.) '--+��''j�`• -y '7 {s }�+-. ••: i" • �s ir5.. r •., t_7 r � +1 f �.4-r :a+[::.�•::1. ••• ••••�:.••.;.�:::: : • il:j (:: N Y'� '}f 1 ,f�h , •}r 4i.}(-� 1 f S I�r �' ••��+t{.t'. •:1:.. :z:• _•C `" ��`� a 1 y •:{:+, _t��.i.• ��'�..� r:i. r� jl�r--��:�_.i aJ�l.l��ii .��-la ��!`Ii:T T^ �T :.•:'•: :• L-J 1� ti r �}t ��.... .� •..."4.J S-/y1 { ;r. -.. 1�T3+. •. 1M f T��-�•C Y'�' T �r f • .a. ..•• .. _ - - 1'f•r } �r' r- } ..�; !!,i+r �r i s i •�w J a{ 1 ��}r"17 • :._:•_:,;�+r i r- .....r:: : .�:}.•• �'� � � a .. "� ,1_ •w .• 1. L ! H, -n.�a�• 0 :}• �, • 111 q �J rn.F � t � h':.:• •;Y;� S An � r• `. �• wri tI t �•i �' _ ' t rrs T' i ��. Y ` } r .•. n t• r u l: i l.�rf,� .a.l� +-� -1--{� .1 T--T. L..J•y y __1--i,:::�'� :•: =,j. :t,�. ;�k ... _.., ;` ��l yrs .. I ti.` `� ';1 �}r.v.•.•:�:. , L,.rte �T•Y"I� M-r-�r � -..� is '� •>�\ 7 d' _��:'::, ......•.. .. ( .. a •fir._{: .� i., .} :r 1 k i. . k ..k / it , ,• "j' :i•r r:F.,:yt:��-� �-•� �} •� 'fir'-7 Y_s t 7 T.. y i •hia � ? ;.6 Sym•.-!7i' n 5. a1:? 7'_r• : i .z ,C vw t •f• v LV w w �. •.•Yry"^rs.+S' � •,•. 'r:4::: "',!, .;}•p±�rJ tv...:�' Ayw j Ja.� �1 � _..._..__ -•. `` .':fir }MSM .'I.'•V''4^\%1. :t:'.•Y,, a �•'*-3 l•. ' �y :•:f'•: 1 : J.. ;: :: : :• S ]� J• ':�':•`•:' •'fir :•T:' :ir hti r. •P' TT• v✓ drY. •r 'j�$$�•',� � 'nom' '•7C•-'•'• e ti ...... . A'V P.•a' .A,Lr� rvr-Y+L•+-. :1• (. .A.. .(�� '�.Y• )�� 1'. 'I. .4►I'.. :Y' '.i. r1r�. •\ .Y.•:..,j/•,,':ti•:•:V:.{ttli . ........ .......... }} :•1:'.•:::':•: ::::::•:'. { •'•• :7:• :i ... 7 t � �'.,y■ - ��. tea— �'�� `��• >a a,;x ss �i �S I�',w OO SOC • � � _ Y�►,� �,••`` � _ 000WGJ044!. tI00IC t .�ti nev. �],�,�� i r�.=�� /�■�/�■��0��1— . � ;s P -CO �6t . � aooca v` $}ao. �� 1 •� v�r''r ��7� S 4sseass,.a,to Xsx�v sou: K yyy:��iM GOC ' ��= is ��Wig'.'ME •.�llfR pRl t F • _ :.Y � '� rNa o � ' r fi ■ tom P s6*56 : ;ite• as , Sb M • XXA QHG i �.� i 84 i83838R3fff$ 4R4 oa r "=�d8883ErieaBif$�/f$fj� � gggg wOW wv :L • r. N / ami UM sa ••� `� r � illl 1�"' � y • ; fit t 1� ,. `'3.,. �i�■ �� / ■h: r 6a�snarN�;,.i4Y:,e 388 �raFa �� NII OUR i�${E�Sfttg opp��awp,:too !tj 16 � SRR�6f��; bbtR�Ss7�^ oax' -ptt b Fit 1 f v r C •Y L L.. 1 - I �L 11+" � � -r f: - .-tom\ ��,-�ti l il_J /' 1`L L. �-t-+ rT •a. -�•,. u ��C-r r L 'I 7, t •'ti• � 1 r 3 f �� •�•�ir :Il:i. -♦ ---- .��: ;tit ,—► — -� - : U. 1 i :z . hi-C, I t sm- L-T #a[?CST'' ; \ -- �-[t.—• �- •t-, ::i�: i .• 1 1t'_ J.C�L'1i' FT _I Tol —r p i .bar'�[ �� --i f.TT}T+•�+,'�--%�:1��'••• •• •-• � MF TIT •'4!'�: !.1�f �C_: f if �• r- Ir - j7 E --r-r-� �vsi} i, +� =dl;'•:j::'•`{ 2 j>tr Ai EE! i., ,�,i�aiq `r�1-} # 1 Ir� �_�,�� :fir:=:;t�' �.�..• �� Lir/ :-1 -� r •r.__.; .Py ;: .• .s::S..;:::'•.`•:'• •�G'.•'J` l. �. it ,:::;:, �:`•� •:: ;.� :� ,:: • jr y r Y f t= '1. e�,r 3 'f i a 'r .1• w. # r -T- 7 •.• #t # �J :•t t _ hA .� 11 :I 1 •'v r S. { may. '' ::•�:•:v::::•. / J.•�.ti•:': {a 's :w :y is r.' C 1 J• :i•.. + f rt••' is _S r>r ••l..,• �:::"�:�':': a Y: �:� ---:>:�.} :�:� :�i :: :}:::: :�;: lam`=•�:•. ] ii•�f f: ) '•r x• - 'Jl,' t l• •`.J)_- •fir:.•:.-• •:�• - �' Y A 19 www�ffwffw Bar 1.5 METZGER PARK LID The Metzger Park LID was formed to provide funding for the Metzger Park and Pavilion construction. The Metzger/Washington Squre area lies within the Park District and levied . 12 per $1,000 A.V. for 1985/86. The l_ID is within the Washington County budget and it is assumed that unless specifically requested to the City will not assume the debt. 20 'r �'•C•r'r f �i•::i:= C� a i-- r i r =1 1 L_ -- -•i }} :'•1 £. T { T-• { i �i 1 a N �ll14L 1I. . .. .....:. . .. .. ........ i i I I a V_i ITTil Fg ,• � --1.J� Lc_ -I ,=�r—>`• rj ';C`I r ��-1 �-}�,:,:;:::: •:.•�::l:i:•17:. 1,113i _ 4 11-At ° ;.• - • :: •• .. � - �, a�*-•f ��_ �i tom,- r �-� 1 , i'.• Lra' _ -i LU) -L f-.• Tei-- ��__• if� • I 1-1 :3 .. 1y1y :•1'. t •'T ( •:�. ::� —� f r..:. - . ll�t • a `. f VI • J . t.- l • ... / ITM L .. :+ice'..; J�. �.i1.. j' ; .�,, _� ,' -�; iK +1 .r i.::� •- , rwT tl e v� i- , : r i. C?J}Y�r v f G f J - J x• •:ti: �T'-77.• ,� r1 } 1 •.�•.t;• y !�,`ti'.:.,Y. }sv-.•.. {. I:::':•t1... $-t'i, i r w 1 r L� Tom..- .•�' .rr f d:: y Ia.•- h• •r r r /' I •is J -al v r�.. Y- •ti. '•t ia•:' } r I!• 1 p h: ''ir• Y yY+O 4•I, Y.YI. :, •:::: ••1 l• it .4 �•• r�Y' -I :'I-• Y:. .. •1•. ......... 2 1.6 DEMOGRAPHICS 6 POPULATION The Metzger/Washington Square Study area lies within three census tracts, 305, 306, 309. For the purposes of this study census tract 305 was disregarded due to its relatively small impact on the area. Urban Decision Systems, Inc. was contracted to provide demographic data on the Study area. For the purpose of an area comparison, tracts 306 and 309 were compared to tracts 307, 308, and 319.02 in the City of Tigard. Tract 309 contains an approximate 50/50 split between Tigard and the Study area. The numbers that are the result of the 1980 census are relatively less important then the percentages drawn from them. 0 The Ethnic background of both areas is relatively the same, white/European. o Both areas contain approximately 75% of the population over the age of 18, with the greatest number falling between the ages of 25-34. 0 Over 50% of the Study area is apartment/condo units while the base is 37%. o Roughly 63% of the Study area housing stock was built prior to 1970 while only 48% of the base area was built prior to 1970. u Turnover (% of owner-occupied units that change hands) is {{ 9.1% in the Study area to 11.27% in the City. i_ o Stability (% of population age 5 or older living in the same unit for 5 or more years) was 34.5% for the Study area vs 36.8% for the City. 0 Average housing value for the Study area was $67,876 versus $80,356 for the City. 0 Average and median household and family incomes was approximately $4,000 less in the Study area. The Demographic Study shows that in most respects the Metzger/Washington Square Community is similar to the City of Tigard. The majority of differences are due to the commercial development and apartment complexes that are within tract 309 (generally west of Hall Boulevard). The more detailed Area Profiles show that tract 306 is very much similar to the City. 22 ��_►.�r�r r t r=..'i � C_H►1.► . ►<-r r _r�. r_r r . . t �.. - + !w-041C4S1L!.•• � � � s �`.moi j�y,�COt � `--=X �b600. Sfb t'SRR�X ;:=� i� � ��_ �■��r r �� - � x !DY¢ ti}o}2�S £K. �� JP ,°p .■ ■■, 4e�4Q 44:DSSiS+ s7x f00: � Oa ae2S •y�,,��6ta�55+R I ■yam � R �%:Qtii4 45^0 AR': 000 1 + &� ZS'i a?gi�0�c-� • a QSnt" ggi'2f'i 62b3d�!� X'0 ni Sit m' gAfa ♦ ' Cm atseae ar" ► on0000•wc :iRR xgocEmig -' ell AM f'bib ,�k,� w ,�• . � B ��f$3f�ffE� pmt ' �� 4. �SQQ�yicgg +S4-t � tile w of 8u44& 030" 10046 f. qwm M 4QQ0 - bwnr S .� •�D��a9�4SQtt Io ac Um U MX . . . . . . . . . $ a0., D«Inm MX . . 2\ A 1 -+O�d+f'ICD+47�O�W N [[ A— d 1 •+W-+mm ►+'f ¢ OD I a a..r .+ �N A 0 N h �'—'f�0 m 1 N N W + v t 11 U to—W t7 1 A I E O�MWNMMNNMO *t9 .,..\•A• 1J l. �'X @�1■*O+NKM tA 1 u A cas h 11 �0O►.�r I IA li >to IA I` CG u I OD�0 C Ol W «� d L AIDN i >} MU. A•+O*O MN n L U.V.\\o a-hc N'40 ' ' e � n(4 0 c moi C1 ON W. (K V A>8!*ltAN i'N N de ��00 E *-at t ®r N u�0► W22 � t 0��0 m J t M C Lam' a 0 C M OCD ri t3 CL 0 No UC Od UL ~ 0 MIt W !1RM Z A N G¢! I UAW. A* z m 0? to- X U� «U+ fIc0 HZ Z ybti 1 I�bhp tAA + ****WNMln A t ? ca9NN-+-sa N MM �OI�+ In 1 \ 0401D* v L.0 4 F 00 Q. v 01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 a W IK to p�p A 0 A. } n*tln9NN-w� 0—L 2 tg.A L A A im mm Oe -+ • 1 *TinN `OW OQlomm 4IDX.\'.\•NXX WX\X\• 41 -N-0 N- 0 NM ® AuuY�y?nO*+ •+ vIt NN0 Nnm* A 1 X07?-• *O+ MMfAM O: 1�1•f NNN NN h AWNNO wOMODOM U & m Cit'1N m I L*(DV)((ENOO / O A-X.\`XO.\'A' *.\`.\•X.� t n •••oNN W OOr LO • • •N • • N • • • v * i1MMM it OR, CNQOM-00 MM(40N lIi %0 .0 hi m 4tn 0 E n E>c W !•N O 1 0000 n UL NtU t0 N N- U W UUEB E t a LOL cat —tn z - m c c 0 0 M A A !I—t Vl to •+ I ""U U N?� z L Y-- to L 0.L a h C C LI-/- Oma' }-- O 103'0 O V— a - - N pCp( W►+ ►+C3 00 J N— 0— J — "JJ I L7 EU 0:CL YUUU 2tl1Ut Om IAA S - -' N 0NAA L •-tn— a W— U L U W 21. W I IIt.t. O di �U_! L 0.« t11—\ L\ 0 to '.a 24 1.7 EXPENDITURE EFFORT The Metzger/Washington Square community receives consistently lower levels of urban services than if in the City of Tigard. The Metzger/Washington Sqaure area currently receives a per capita service level approximately 45% of that provided for City of Tigard residents. Of specific categories studied, only Parks consistently has a greater per capita effort greater than Tigard. The most visible of urban services delivered, Public Safety, shows an expenditure level of approximately 47% of Tigard's delivery level. On average, Metzger receives half the services provided in the City of Tigard. PROPERTY TAXES HOUSEHOLO SERVICE LEVEL PAIO/EXPENDITURES 300. 2000. Metzger Tigard soa j iaoo. I 1 i Tigard ,:- ----------- I i 300. .-- ----- 5200. $ TOO. ................ $ 000 �,,.. Pe8tzger 400. i 100. ... •- -{ i _—__ 8 / 1/82 131/83 83/t�4 84/8 P.T. EX P.T. EX Over the last 5 years the Metzger/Washington Square community has received approximately $340 per capita in expenditure effort versus $775 per capita for City of Tigard residents. This is $435 per capita less or approximately $2.5M based upon 5,800 residents, the average over 5 years. 5 Year CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA METZGER/Wash. Sq. Tigard 169.38 Public Safety 305.00 31.00 Finance 79.45 £' 81.60 Community Development 276.45 8.67 Administration 40.06 34.89 Parks 24.42 13.73 Library 49.18 e s 4 339.27 Total 774.56 i i F 1 { 25 1.8 TAX RATES Tax rates are compared for the municipal jurisdictions in the Metzger/Washington Square area per $1,000 AV_ Those jurisdictions are Beaverton, Portland, Tigard and Tualatin. During the term of the study period the City of Portland and the City of Tigard both show the least percentage of change, with the City of Tigard showing the lowest municipal tax rate. MUNICIPAL TAX RATES JURISDICTION 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 Portland 6.29 6.48 6.79 6.58 6.43 6.71 Beaverton 5.37 7.01 6.48 5.23 5.52 4.23 Tualatin 2.12 3.59 3.36 3.30 3.51 4.13 Tigard (1) .60 1. 19 1.12 1.18 1.06 1.35 (1) Excludes Cost Fire Protection MUNICIPAL TAX RATES j e "portianil . . .. a Beave on .. :?i9ar�:.......... ....... ....... 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 The following Table shows tax rates adjusted to include applicable Fire Districts. URBAN SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS TAX RATE PER $1,000 AV JURISDICTION 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 Portland 6.29 6.48 6.79 6.58 6.43 6.71 Beaverton 5.37 7.01 6.48 5.23 5.52 4.23 Tualatin(1) 5.52 6.80 6.64 6.45 6.63 6.73 Tigard(2) 3.40 3.94 3.82 3 .88 3.77 4.00 (1) Tualatin base rate plus Tualatin RFPD. (2) Tigard base rate plus Wash. Co. RFPD #1. 26 The following is a table of tax rates as they would apply for Metzger/Washington Square tax payers and the estimated property tax cost for 1985/86 based upon a $65,000 assessed valuation. TAX AGENCY METZGER TIGARD BEAVERTON PORTLAND Municipal - 1.35 4.23 6.71 Wash. Co. 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93 USA .36 .36 .36 .36 School Dist. #23 11.55 11.55 11.55 11.55 Metzger Water .03 .03 .03 - Metzger Sanitary .28 - - Metzger Water Combined .64 .64 .64 .64 Wash. Co. ESD .25 .25 .25 .25 Port. Comm. Coll. .58 .58 .58 .58 ¢' Wash. Co. RFPD #1 2.65 2.65 Port of Portland .37 .37 .37 .37 Metro Serv. Dist. .16 . 16 .16 . 16 Metzger Park .19 ? - - Tua1. Hills Pr. & Rec. Dist. - - 1.34 - Total Tax Rate 18.99 19.87 21.44 22.55 Total Property Tax $1234.35 1291.55 1393.60 1465.75 From Washington County Summary of Assessment & Tax roll, 1985-86. (?)Tigard is willing to support Metzger decision on keeping park levy as is or incorporating into City--wide system. Question decided by Metzger. �T- EST. PROPERTY TAX COSTS F. $ I Goo. L m I a 27 h �v; 2. 1 ASSESSMENT The Metzger/Washington Square area contains five tax codes with an assessed valuation of $244,599,600.00. The Washington Square complex Ccontains approximately 1/3 of the assessed valuation of the area, $82,447,000.00. MEFZGER/WASHINGI"ON SQUARE ASSESSED VALUATION 1985/86 1 TAX CODE ASSESSED VALUATION ($) 23-63 17,621,500.00 23-64 169,213,100.00 23-72 1,301,800.00 51--11 11,249,600.00 51--/7 45,213,600.00 244,599,600.00 1 Washington County Assessors Summary of Assessment and Tax Roll. 1985/86. F s 28 �y r Y•t/ i, I Ll a�1• �1 ,r r � •• TTJf'IT T .. �i�l T-gib 't 1-' .. •'� r, I :a•. f r l -L1.11 5 r—1-- Y' T ........... r 1il�_tJ E ..... :• � _ - ul .}.};, •: .' •'' '.J1 .J ^L yC. J-LltL�L9�T1"' •1 an s r • -' —�-�._ �-1 r'__ L-1♦ r-•-...—i r'T -� O _ OU i. '•,; �:i!;:�• _L 1�.�I<l��1 .��. Y 1 -^-..: 1_ i-� -T .'r_'T-. —��T- ,�i' r :;;�,-• V .t Inill_ A-; F / 1 l 7t j"» , T -•t 1' 'T._ i T \ ✓•—+�-_Ian ;.{'.��:1.• rrIT- ........... .......... ...........: :;L;� F- _..___J f'-� ••�'�••• Y11L4�}''• r•J..{.,'i..t:'' '1•' �1- 6 r s Y� A •l: i a: +b MR, r. x.. j} t r •::•::::::::::.•:::: ...... :f. .. : '. . f• 1 ' .. .47 •:: - ;:�, 11 2 '•ti 'A .f :a •l t Y - •M { �}�•:�4. }}tt l' J�� titih =: 2 _ NOW so a � a3iR •• - - VI ruh o►� — + Q��ar2s ana � ■� ■■,■H �/� •V WTI ■ate; a °e��rl��; � ■ 4 ; �loc l "cam k: L; n bisst S9/ 1 ■11. qp )000 r- xei65MOM �1 1 • �m• ■1�� o xt��sw�esu7r_ _ti�� / ■ � mom Moog +wvn�,;,;44 �' a ■■ r� 111 �m ■_!� ��` '�{�i�$ ��p� � �3: n„+vr. "�1S4�S`eomo -� � �� =a �■r` _®�� °'4�$8$�3Q01�� '�8�� . . run nurlra■ � , .MT .. s�+►rr rau�l: �� V ..,-;s zws1 ■� ns ...■ i+■■ ( �� 11.. �• Sr t■ / rii/11111 _ SFS /■�� Rlgi�� ai � � � ■/ 1$bSAR3{ � � qq in $ T fKSft4.,2wR� �r� r v �� 4� �x bNOQSSsi� �pp� aQ dQo imp � )y Y 9078. 9 deaAi t.i ��'. �� o9x acetap�asio�. p�d�9flC ,,{{ r 1 .dCn��lq�t885a3i' 6iSRIftBill Spa �8 3 x vat ARz e�aRkl- ,RIA: r . V s • 8$ A K 2.2 FRANCHISES Franchises are granted by governmental bodies to private corporations providing utility services for a given area and allow those corporations ' to act as monopolies in those areas. This licensing of the utilities allows them use of public right-of-ways. FRANCHISE SERVICE AND PROVIDER:. SERVICE PROVIDER FRANCHISE FEE Electricity Portland General Electric 3 .5% of gross revenue Natural Gas Northwest Natural Gas 3.0% of gross revenue Telephone General Telephone 3.0% of gross revenue Pacific Northwest Bell 3.0% of gross revenue Solid Waste Disposal Miller's Sanitary Service 3.0% of gross revenue Cable TV Storer Cable 3.0% of gross revenue TCI Cable 3 .0% of gross revenue ESTIMATED YEARLY FRANCHISE FEE FRANCHISE ESTIMATED FEE Portland General Electric 150,000.00 Northwest Natural Gas 75,000.00« General Telephone 14,358.79 Pacific Northwest Bell 72,500.00* ( Miller's Sanitary Service 4,500.00 Storer Cable 1,000.00 TCI Cable 5,200.00 TOTAL_ $322.,558.79 Estimated Franchise Fee 31 �pp�7w�Q�4Pf.rMW �i ]OOOOP� KF000nc �� _� �� . t ��l•`b000 _'•x l'./.'•1 {1t61.14fSQf iSadrv} H1111 �� a I �� W\� ■�� x ibc2?S S S Hill 11 =� t.r�n xr $� a >oo N" • rr1.1� w ,:spa 44'2ssa+ �;x- Boa; �xd�« �l� ■r_�r■. going- 0000 t ng $$ A{R ak04K4 Qsrc nazi \+,�,Ni�� ■■ l ��.,'— ii _ ;1,_-- a,r� is , ma �{ �.o am �; iso �►'� ,Kg MSH�$}( � ' . 7O x� stvsaa �1( - ,d3B Rt M - Ytr�rK so V/ti os '�s1+c2fiRK� ■ `ea �r sNZ u � ��tlwNii/fl�i�l/tr �o� �i�e �� cam,w . .tl�u►� �� o it �■ .. �•L.` 'lr• IN Bohai 41 1 lig wa � - ■�� Q�:�ecBFbta a,�as,y■a 902 2 1p1 hemi :.� up.". f Sal 00000Q4p�� b � 6 ci iar�.` i 119 f 4 ;� �,,,,,,ao_ }i::•r r !T:•. .Q I ='r .• f 1 - 7, u r t t• t=i - �1 r• r s L. �'�•'•L1.1 LL UI i 1_�.111�I j t: t- .F �; •,',• t 1 i l t F- r i qwo rTEB WT l� - - - ",..-� >' fir', "�'"• j � rI a � `9�-.•..•-. ... ♦�: _f ate•- �� - r-- .� � - :. Lf i R i , _� � 77 + t LAJ •� _ �� i-_ L .I�`_' �j C�!¢f�T SI C 1_��.L.i JL_l_J �- T,,:, 'l S i] - - ;•� `•f:• T�1 _ T..� I. r"�ilif-1 1 T ��T _i l Y1T��'it •"•••• CJ -1 LId :. 2 _� '•-�1 `� -_— )"r _tel. ..- •: :;ti•• OC -J _ f� M'• it t)-'-'9y •�T� Ell ...L.la.L1_l..-.� -►.. _��--LT-1 i1 p t J L r .71 i a f. ,� �-- : ',j I -/JjJ •,s il_ T I h-i (��«-j. .'\. •:� ':4 i':: T�TTLI � i .y. `.�,-',��',��'.��'.��'.� { / i 1 I I / •1: ':'' J .•.. :•rtee I I � _ 1 •:s f lam- .I XX f '.`�•:. :f. }?:-:tea' _ '.....� } ..\?�•�•:•_. ' —,� Z.I ;•M'•��:;:tom: :".�-�Y•'.'-�••.�. � G �. �i. ( ti + {• '•its'' .til.'.. �.. :•J. n •'tJ •'1 Y. .' ••fir. ��y.-�• Y' .{{�''-- t• E .A 33 _ ....._... r r i :z ., ;,.�.•�� ,� 'fit: -. }a�aJ:�'}::•. 1. l , T --4r ; f ( �J _ _ l } � t r� T I ::Y S/ L� -1 r rt ,.,r::T'T' tib:?}:•='{;:: -- rC� tl t' t -a t _ i Lill � ��- ,F �Y �1 .'t.}•. r� T� ,l�ft� r` - 111.17� •, ti• i _ , N ,� _ t i t l l� I T- u 1� �. r-' t :3:i:3v• :'t.-'rL•i: _1 L_ _i�.1�'d �. _.ZIJ•'_7 iT.. .L. r!L.L....11 tt,;i;-+.r t r?-r }i cWir _ J TT '%•:�rrX•.;ti�. - ~rte r�_ � V.i.�r-1 1 L__L. _ •''•rte:••'':'- �, N -}(��$+1 _l T_'. : �•['; I / r. t .L-'1 -'�'(?*1 f•:.r -j- V-}{ r-..—�•r` I -t - - :• •jr ' r, `IJ�� T.•._.ITA-1 rL.-I r�r[� M IL awl IT L-- :•Gti.:•: t •y. •ai :r i s,. .x ;.fir.�'.•. 4 •T ........r . : tF i Zl ::ter'. :r!::;��_s;•:.. :}: ' ? ':r •.i:ti•:,.::.. v. r:. 'r Y r• .. .• .. f1 � � .Y• l•' a•, :�• �-• .J }: .J• Mi. '•:v :•ter:-r+-+':. 34 t' 2.3 "ABANDONED" SHARED REVENUES AND ENTITLEMENTS Revenues of the State of Oregon and Washington County are returned to incorporated areas through various revenue sharing programs. These lT intergovernmental shared revenues ('ie. gas tax, cigarette tax, etc. . .) are essentially "abandoned" by residents of unincorporated areas such as Metzger/Washington Square. Thesri are taxes which are currently being paid, but to which only City residents are entitled. For 1985/86 this amounts to more than $250,000 with over one-third designated for streets, sidewalks and other transportation system improvements. ABANDONED REVENUES METZGER/WASHINGTON SQ. STUDY AREA STATE OF OREGON SHARED REVENUES ITEM RATE(1) x POP. (2) AMOUNT' Cigarette Tax $1.89 x 5,940 $11,226.60 Liquor Tax 7.31 x 5,940 43,421.40 Street Tax 18.25 x 5,940 108,405.00 Library Grant Aid .1244 x 5,940 738.94 Revenue Sharing 5.23(3) x 5,940 31,_066.20 Total $1.94,858. 14 WASHINGTON COUNTY SHARED REVENUES Gas Tax 5.76 x 5,940 $34,214.40 Library 4.78 x 5,940 28,393.20 Total $62,607.60 State Shared Revenue $194,858. 14 fi County Shared Revenue 62,07.60 Total Abandoned Revenue $257,465.74 or $43.34 Per Capita (1) 1985/86 Rates 3; (2) Est. Population 1985 per PSU Population Center (3) Est. Per Capita Rate r C 35 i 2.4 VACANT AND BUILDABLE LAND Approximately 61.0 acres of vacant and/or buildable land has been identified through research of Washington County Assessor's records. This includes property where the structures on it are of less than $5,000 value. The inventory includes current Washington County zoning, number of lots and total acreage. , Current Zoning #1 of Lots Acreage Residential 5 Units/acre 43 30.0 it 9 1. 8 10.0 00 15it 5 2.5 •' 24 0 0 25+ " 0 0 Office Commercial 14 3.5 Neighborhood Commercial 4 2.0 Community Business District 3 13.0 General Commercial 0 0 Institutional 7. .5 Current zoning allows for approximately 277 dwelling units to be built in the area, however, about 25-40 percent lie in areas that would be difficult to develop in the near future. s. Y�. 36 - } q�; ♦z .fir ETTT tn� r' r r�. 1 Y�-re•: t r ` r `t { f 1 �' t i i' 4, I : J� f- ff 1- �i t i A 7 f - 1 `t r71 mul — 1 T s , i 1 L_l L11 Ll 1 �4 _ , .- �-"• ,`T' �-r 1- r--. +•--- J T >• ••• "^e•Y'r.•: ..,.. u: t' Y.-•i �ff.�1� s _ 1i f ii-� �rjX ::. ••:�':t'�• 1...,.1 •_t J J� �1. _ _1-.��.-JT.. { l r 1. 1.1.7L'�_i l_-� 1 r Y a..:• ��.: �. � �- .cry 1 '�, > ;•I+.�u7:'I•: {'• _i_J i a 11�.. .- l._ L :. TEt UMB--irm Z}lT ... . :: LO Lill f co :i:•• } ��•,• �jl' ��;��-.-� r� �f r. "!�•i � _- !,I r i',,,1_j�J -- -t;. n t - ,r .. LJ �y - r.- a '_�:�: � � :.'..• •- �:,.;..........:-. .yrs r �,r- . Vit-••,, _ :':.•:. M , -� _::: y r it ? :::: 7 X. r..r T ........:: 9f-i r ............. •.. !• r •1 r :r '=P i _ ! •'r .j _ •u —X• (�: '::�:• f /1�j .� :Lei:•••�'.•. �. •`!..1, :: �'!' •.� r'�'•. -"' `��'�' .. .f•'_� moi•.. :�•.::{: :.. f 'r: / : .r:•� .. __ : �.• ,- is .�}{{ / t -y y�/' r•. y,r c::. •.::::.. �� C 1 .... ;;.Y.f;. tis.. .. .. ...• � l�J .1 ti':': I'........... :i .............. .... 'I. Y. :w ....... A' y t. ':K:•J :F orf•.'. • ............ ' ............. '.R f ........... .... .... ... . ............... X. Jc. t W ! Y 1 :�::•:::. ire ••�• :1.- ��y .1 J •r -Y- r:• :r: r: ;.�''•' :.'}air-k. :_..�: r a-.. .S- '1.:. =vi.• 3 .. 2.5 FEES 6 CHARGES Fees and Charges for services of administrative and regulatory nature (i.e. building permits, licenses, etc, . . .) provide revenue to offset the cost of those services. City of Tigard Business Lincense 0-10 employees (140 X $40) $ 5,600 11-50 employees (50 X $75) 3,750 51 or over employees (10 X $150) 1,500 Libor License By the package (10—$5) $ 50 By the Glass (15 X $10) 150 Sewer User Service Charge Residential Rate ($31.50 X 2500) $78.750 Sewer Maintenance ($2.25 X 2500) 5,625 Storm drainage fee ($.75 X 2500) 1,875 TOTAL $97,300 City of Portland Business License 2.2% of net income (.022 X $2OM) $440,000 Liquor License ($35 X 25) 875 Sewer User Service Charges ($76.20 X 2500) 190,500 TOTAL $631,375 City of Beaverton Business Licenses ($7.50 X 3,000) $ 22,500 Liquor Licenses 875 Sewer User Charges ($33.30 X 2500) 83,250 TOTAL $106,625 EST. FEES AND CHARGES REVENUE iso. Wo. � I 0 0 Soo. I O. _ ig . Port Bvtn x 38 2.6 REVENUE ESTIMATE Revenues to be generated from the Metzger/Washington Square area are based upon current rates and estimates received from holders of franchises in the area. It is anticipated that non—tax revenues will exceed $500,000. Based upon current property tax rates and fees and charges the City of Tigard will generate approximately $900,000, Beaverton $1.7M and the City of Portland, $2.8M in revenues from Metzger/Washington Square. Tigard Beaverton Portland Property Tax $210,355.14 $1,034,653.70 $1,641,259.20 Shared Revenues 256,465.74 256,465.74 256,465.75 Franchise Fees 322,558.79 322,558.79 322,558.79 Fees and Charges 97,300.00 106,625.00 631,375.00 TOTAL $886,679.67 $1,720,303.10 $2,851,658.60 Tigard debt retirement* $119,853,51 ($1,006,533.10) Proposed property tax ratio would exclude debt retirement for Metzger/Washington Square. EST. TOTAL REVENUE 3000. 24M 1600. $ x 1,000 1200. 600. 0. ig vtn Fort ESTIMATED REVENUES TIMELINE J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A I S 1-0--1 N D &C SR F PT 1986 1987 39 3. 1 CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT The capital needs assessment for the Metzger/Washington Square community is compiled from reports prepared by and for the agencies (Washington County and USA) currently responsible for the infrastructure as it exists. Areas of concern that will have an impact on the capital budget of any jurisdiction assuming responsibility for the study area are: a Streets - Vehicle movement within the study area o Pedestrian Network - Movement of pedestrian traffic to schools and public transportation in the Study area. o Drainage - Dispersal of storm water in the Ash Creek Basin. o Wastewater - Upgrade and/or replacement of the existing system. The Metzger/Washington Square community is largely developed with its urban service infrastructure in place. Transportation and drainage are the capital segments which require the greatest amount of attention. Overview Streets F Fourteen major capital projects have been identified by the Metzger/Progress Circulation Study as being needed to facilitate improved vehicular movement in the area. Costs for these projects have been estimated at $12.75m with $9.5m of those costs anticipated to be borne by outside agencies. Pedestrian Network Currently, approximately 2 miles of sidewalk exists scattered throughout the area mostly in newer subdivisions and the Washington Square Area. About 7.5 miles of additional sidewalk is required to provide adequate facilities to insure safe pedestrian access. Fstimated cost is in the area of $250,000. Drainage The Ash Creek Drainage Master Pian has identified 21 capital projects necessary to improve drainage in the Ash Creek Basin. An estimated $2.Om of the total $2.25m has been identified as lying in the Metzger/Washington Square area. Wastewater USA has identified two problems areas in tie study area. They are the addition of a parallel line to the Ash Creek interceptor and replacement of the Hemlock Street interceptor. Cost estimate is approximately $400,000 for both projects. I 40 e � 3.11 STREETS Movement of vehicular traffic in the area is hindered by the lack of direct North/South and East/West connections on the mainly rural type local roads. Washington Square and Lincoln Center have also increased the amount of vehicle movement within the study area. The Metzger-Progress Circulation Study conducted by the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation is the source document for this portion of the analysis. 1, Taylors Ferry Road Extension Extend Taylors Ferry Road from Washington Drive to Oleson Road upgrading it to major collector standards (70 feet right-of-way, 40 feet pavement width). Requires purchase of additional right-of-way. Project would provide more direct East-West route for Beaverton-Portland traffic and reduce traffic on Washington Drive. Because of the amount of traffic on Taylors Ferry, it is anticipated Washington County would maintain it as a County Road. 2. Lincoln Street Extension Extend Lincoln Street from Locust Street to Oak Street and improve to minor collector (60 feet of right-of-way, 32 feet pavement width). Requires additional right-of-way. 3. Locust Street Improvement Upgrade Locust Street to major collector status from Lincoln Street to 80th Avenue. 4. 74th Street Extension Extend 74th Street from Barbara Lane to Locust Street and improve to minor collector, Requires construction of a structure to traverse Ash Creek (approximately 250 feet) and additional right-of-way. Would provide better North-South access from Taylors Ferry to Highway 99W. 5. Intersection Safety Improvements Reduce accident rates at intersection of 72nd and 80th at Oak Street through improved sight distances. 4 tX F� 41 A , 6. Hall Boulevard/Scholls Ferry Road Intersection Improvements. Improve traffic flow through the intersection by increasing traffic capacity and reducing safety hazards. Requires additional right-of-way. Preliminary engineering to begin with construction anticipated to begin in 1986. Funding combination of state, federal and local (LID) monies. 1.10 feasibility study approved by Washington County 12/17/85. 7. Oleson Road Improvement Increase traffic capacity on Oleson Road from Hall Boulevard to Garden Home Road. It is anticipated Oleson would be maintained by Washington County. 8. Hall Boulevard Improvement Increase traffic capacity on Hall Boulevard to accommodate existing and future demand and reduce demand on local streets. Requires additional right--of-way. Hall Boulevard is state road and proposed for inclusion in ODOT Six-year Highway Improvement Program. 9. Greenburg Road Improvement Widen final section of Greenbur•g Road to five lanes. Additional right-of--way required. 10. 80th Avenue Improvement Upgrade 80th Avenue from Oleson Road to Oak Street to major collector standards. 11. Oak Street Improvement Improve Oak Street to major collector standards from Hall Boulevard to 71st Street. 12. Taylors Ferry Road Improvement Upgrade Taylors Ferry Road to major collector standards from 80th Avenue to 65th Avenue. Requires add itiot:al right--of-sway. Anticipate Taylors Ferry to remain under county jurisdiction. s t, 42 13. Greenburg Road/Highway 217 Interchange Improvement. Provide additional traffic capacity on the Greenburg overpass from southbound Highway 217. State has allocated $200,000 in !" 00OT Six-year Highway Improvement Program. 14. Locust Street Bridge (Ash Creek) Replace existing culvert with bridge wide enough for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. County is applying for $60,000 bridge replacement grant from Federal Highway Administration. Preliminary engineering under way. CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - Streets COST COST TOTAL B PROJECT AREA CONST. RIGHT-OF-WAY COST 1. Taylors Ferry Rd. Ext. Metz $915,000 $263,000 $1,178,000 2. Lincoln St. Ext. Metz 165,000 73,000 238,000 3. Locust St. Imp. Metz 520,000 -- 520,000 4. 74th Ave. Ext. Metz 718,000 95,000 813,000 5. Intersection Imp. 72nd 5 80th Oak St. Metz 1,500x' - 1,500 6. Hall Blvd/Scholl& Fy. Rd. Intersection Imp. Wash. Sq. 379,000 856,000 1,235,OOOxf* 7. Oleson Rd. Imp. Metz/ 1,125,000 140,000 1,265,000 Wash. Sq. 8. Hall Blvd. Imp. *'K* Metz/ 3,305,000 900,000 4,205,000 Wash. Sq. 9. Greenburg Rd. Imp. Wash. Sq. 330,000 70,000 400,000 10. 80th Ave. Imp. Metz 1,030,000 - 1,030,000 11. Oak St. In43 Metz 700,000 - 700,000 12. Taylors Ferry Rd. Imp. Metz 840,000 100,000 940,000 13. Greenburg/Hwy. 217**** Metz/ Interchange Imp. Wash. Sq. 2001000 200,000 TOTAL $10,228,500 $2,497,000 $12,725,500 * Estimate of Const. Cost. xcat* Inclusion of 6-Yr. Hwy. Imp. * Joint Funding USDOT, ODOT, LID. Frog. Prelim. Eng. - 1987 Const. 1989. *zx-* No Cost Est. Widening $200,000 ODOT Budget for Re-striping. 14. Locust St./Ash Creek Brgd. No Cost Estimate. Wash. Co, has applied for $60,000 Widening (Ped/Bicycle Imp.) Fed. Hwy. Admin. Bridge Replacement Grant. SOURCE: Metzger/Progress Circulation Study, Washington County W1, Auq. 1985 3 43 .4- i t1_1i 00C x ■NQS, i v,i;2 4Sl:4fS)St s•At S0�) a� wi:��aSR � � � ■f � 1�`� t fb7 Rte„ . r ABX f �Va�pilt�S E Y0�[ �� SMC �Q. �.�, � �, ■ �ae�eO000c �':� PW WON xas VkA vw a i ORO J{tVIJ1l AI 1�1� p. i � , 000 oca MIS ■a � � � as�� iii SO • , 611$9 SIR; of 4w a i ani �sa swg K .tel ISM_ R�' ••� it tH r 9 ri >?X<,r !1?�!�C 7Q4SiSi �i � �3—.i•��. q� 4Sta.v �4. _ _ civ' � �1 �� fa/� �I��.• r� -,~�`OQ4�� St - SO}4 Ysar.T �R �S� x ZZW.� a4atzaooaa4i P4i0c ■ ■ ■� �� --_"_?S� R*01 M ■�i �_ :si ■ •�it� �1_''%�p t,H{a 9Q.Qss6i �esc SQU �oQt44 rnb , ♦. � ��r..., ■■i�f� RfS�iR �SSi-Qt{� QCt`Q %22 yy1QQ�QppSem ftms2w '62 Q0004 ; ,� � »►�� :��■ x,11 ;',, � A T AW CIM 000C 50. Dom ,o far °`�^ � -• . . �.$� � . BAN >T b rig 5W � OoiS�Qty-' uV12�tx � >vwv ew !! i• ter! �i ■ �p Q�$p8�]3�� ' - aUNMN tot R.,� � � .. �} O��I 7V��27•-, �� . /�_ ■ li i a � F "IFARM USSR? IsR!�3wR� �• � �� a■�! m - �� 3 BAbrae �QL488�tR, - 1■ ii ten■ at - � �� ..■ � a--K osi�tss��e�v� ;gid $'�d",�'� ,� /i�j �r ,��r s■-� �BpF gd 366 3" coitR n QiRlat�bia 4i�R7ShNY: 2SH '@�O 'f tit Mao �Od V � � ,�y�29fQ4�� rL -0 QQQ•- o_ 3. 12 PEDESTRIAN NETWORK Improvements and new construction of the pedestrian and bicycle networks are required to ensure safety of residents transiting to schools or the Tri-Met system. The existing pedestrian network consists of approximately 11,700 feet of sidewalk widely scattered in the community . The Metzger/Progress circulation study has identified another 39,400 feet of sidewalk needed to provide a suitable network. Based upon an estimate of $1.25 per squre foot of sidewalk, total estimated cost of these projects is $246,250. 46 C� - r .1 t .1. :3 a i. R• f— r' 1' 4 MR k • t 1 t '•tet• 1 – L 1 �• - r t'1. rv'} `T?ai�:'1" i� •.a .r-r t-t{ .. r-. t' :��''��:••..•.;':•':;r.' :r.;.� i - 12 r• r.m •rye r •.awe t1• Ir { -�••ry" •'Y:YX':•::':'•'.' �.��:. a. •st•' j t .�• �' i - - - II :�_-a •i: I- f :. �LPT _TT :L yr .;�.�;.�r1�-. I• _ -\ 1� 1� ',•\ !� •1 'fit •�3 � — �{. 1_.� 1 •;t t� �_Iw'_-i , e. , XG�' 1! , if "t' `11L1 . I�::iiJl I�: ; � .`-�1. ,TT T�y'n� «,• Ia �1 ` t1E- _� ; 1 L� ,r' IEEJt �� t t-r' t..:::.: i j• { y F r r L :I' , , ^`1 w:7 Tj� -r j L- '! { { !l}--'• 1 W a tom'...•f•�:' _ � - ' , _-• �., ._ �-�.� . -TT-, _ r• UJ Li •:�i •r� i�� t-+ ' i i - y r it ^��T 1` ��::::: —.�+ �1~ � .�G:''•''• tt11 .la il:ia�-� "� rr '1 t'F�^. -�j rrTr� V �" Z r 1 ;:�`:::.. r:.•. y t r T .r. f / •i 1 71t. :'r• ,r 1 I� _I :•tti ww r r } '1 : .. :i•. ' 77 : p .•J. •. :j r .•s.V •`aY { :,•:•:�:•:::•::: :`tom:• R. is :•�.. •J i. :w ••{' :Art :!:' �r••V C :::::•::::•::::::.� :•:tiff•::, r. • r• . w t. :•r:: •: ::•``: :•: ::: �j 47 777 _ i c- 7CQG94 A[ ZOOOVS�RR 1� �, t'�� ■ �.i�� ,�a )p��¢¢- Ytt��P,,,,�..��?X i-�X �S;$�� - dG �J90QS�--��i, WaZiSX"2S ■ ri �■ r+c� �hLr r `.111111 .�,.� �►•=c_ ■ ,7 s : �:� 44�� .aq.(Q �s ,��SSR I � � ■1Wt\ '� RSR6i �43i �CCS'9 RRZ 4 �a2f wC 6ax -y8 }C6 �� ■ �l ' p,,r» gt2fS�} btGUMA aQ PSO �QQS1TOSot rw+w 'S8if� ). !olRtSiL,.X�, !ffi��2RS,■ - « �6':�q� • � ..✓off .neea�oo g�gba ��,�.- y RUM mm I 1+ a;R{.w so it l ■ nes. f vIl 1S[ 4444so r , ■ K �}� . xa Kx• 'Oi x ' +�af000w�c- •x4tSa�N � � ■ 1 ■ ANKM,n l BIlion GG 14 Mogi min 06 bag 4lviw.rR$u - moi= � � \ Y 4� 6C�K Al�i4QSts.u� ZilS4FS`c 4411 'aafe s 7Q � n r 3. 13 DRAINAGE The Metzger/Washington Square area lies entirely with the Ash Creek Basin and faces the impact of the drainage problems within this basin. Washington County Department of Land Use and transportation conducted the Ash Creek Drainage Study with the assistance of Kramer, Chris, and Mayo, Inc. and David Evans and Associates, Inc. The Master Plan, currently under discussion, has identified 21 problem areas within the basin with approximately 90% of those in the Metzger/Washington Square and Tigard Communities. Cost estimates have been prepared and projects prioritized. Fu rid irig formula are still under study with user fees assumed to be the greater proportion of funding. ASH CREEK BASIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (PROPOSED) PROJECT COST YEAR FROM BASE 1 Replace Hemlock Culvert $74,300 11 2 Replace Cedarcrest Culvert 15,400 10 3 Replace Taylors Ferry Bridge 1.1.8,900 12 4 Replace Taylors Ferry 6 80th Culvert 15,000 13 5 Replace 80th Culvert 1.6,500 14 6 Replace Oleson Culvert 13,900 17 7 Pipe Taylors Ferry 150, 100 17--18 8 Pipe 71st 52,500 18 9 Replace Park Place Culvert 27,200 1.1 10 Replace 82nd Culvert 18,600 15 11 Replace 80th Culvert 1.6,500 17 12 Replace Locust Crossing 147,900 1 13 Replace Hall Crossing 147,900 2--4 14 Regrade Channel Hwy 217/Fanno 141,700 19-20 15 Gold Course Detention 17,500 3 16 Pipe Hall 156,600 13-14 17 Pipe Locust 125o300 2 18 Pipe 91st 175,300 15--16 19 Pipe Channel 741 ,400 5-1.0 20 New Ditch 89th/Ash Creak 24,100 20 21 Replace RR Spur Culvert 42`100 19 $2,231,900 Source: Ash Creek Drainage Master Plan 49 l f �M w., •�LL r rj L.1..Lj L Ir-L l� i l '�-. �;•ll++(�}i::'..:.: .�. t "ire 1 ' ►, a �� :�r.� �, r:� �� i Js•: •. ... ..:: _.. '.." �{i a _gyp'�t �a �'�� '•' _ : J :•. / qtr YK- 2- 1W . , r, FT (1r?I1.� .� �l..ir -i�� 3 ' ('t;';' :;,.;:�I'J• f::.I L4 ---I .!-T• f ! _+ f- {tt _i� �••• "�r—I �.� .r f:; •;',:.•.•G r C _ - y 1•� .----t .� {,� ,:-7 • "'ili• :ti:: Via:.-. .. __ +-,`^• --4-i�i r- r _-7..'�: ;r -- �� ::�T::;• .;{. .:'\ .o i I�J } t I —1LJ 1� .y� I L.. S T •:Y , r f 1r f[ice--+ �✓ JJ K. :':! :I - : .,{:.,,t,•. ..;:-r:��: ..kms,,•.; :: .;.�.ti. .r:. t: -7- t"- X. Xf r.. r f ..../, :.:::•: ::.. ..: •T y: :•�+;f( �'-:':::''::: :•}' :+J '' {-fig-. \ eta;. 1. 1.. :•J S r ? ) P Y. J }} rN r• ':•r' L': Y ON .Y.�- ,, •::: :, L: ti�:• JMIFM •: ••'rr� .Y. rC. } ••w ..... •: r. 1•: { r. 1•. l:• .Y.. O ................. .. .......... .. 5 .. 3. 14 WASTEWATER Responsibility for the wastewater collection system in the Metzger area lies with USA. Washington Square has and maintains its own system and enters the USA network north of Cascade Blvd and highway 217. The majority of the System is in place with only 2 problem areas existing and identified in the USA Master Plan. Costs are estimated to be approximately $400,000 with those costs to be potentially shared with upstream users of the system. 1. Construct 3,000 feet of interceptor parallel to existing line from hall Blvd/Hemlock to 89th/Spruce Street. 2. Replace 4,000 feet of 15" interceptor from Hall Blvd/Hemlock Street east to a point south of Ventura Court. E 1 : Z. 51 4 ... 04-7 8 �i1VS7� ' �1 � ��,.� � �,/_� K.. �'-' St •.H„1 15R58� _. t �I�,1�■1 ddU� � Usk a "' Ei�i� ' .r��i�t ih:OP .Y. V � wtRRs85t b:1 CC OC:OC' ss6t sOQ1 ..a �6AR S1 RfRiR �A4tKo scs RRi iFF1jl �t' i 1 �fl�s�� ■ 3 RS 2�P: w affSt� Rsa q� 11 .-t__ _ NONE S.a ,Yxv +944S�G ,iHl �i� �• Q- a �, x.pcA • ■ � A • 7 � ..J1MYh� fOo00 ., t!t fifl 7 t 2f>istRF � �lfK � E ,,,,ir �,i�t��;i I ; B98eSf6t�■ssar RD fl',;Rc�;,riR �s�'"= � I Q�sn e'eSEbcaaxfao�Mpa� 39 a9JJ fp j $E d{t+e:;�22o�$8R►6!'Q�FR�i88t��"y ��+� �k"ii �na %pw-,.388i t JJ ^ diiRitltl�i � 6s A✓69tia ■ Is r ■/ ■ 1111 iil! 3a 1 ! frb FIs a'�� ! .al■ l� ��_ 1 oil SENIOR 0 r. �� ■ :Ilii -f�l'� , MOW ^,v. ■ ur • • �■■ �a :i�i !��$f$i8383881k8gi��it •�, . s_ i �/IIwi1/1/t1111■■ d � 6 '8kic ssr i•�t7 Wil• ■� iili 11: ■ !� ..1 /NZ a ��Yiltl�/all■■i sm �j ,a ■ , �11�� i♦1.� ii ij■1N1/Itr/1/1�i 4 e� _ ,_ 1/ • ,. .. �.. •. ,.l lir ►�.� ■/ t. iii ■/■• iri��r /1 111 tic '1 J ■ Sip ■] Nli ■■Ila■ Hugo assatai49 j�b�vJil�.ifL$u �.0 �� ` r � � �► QZSd bCocR9iR4V14GSK.i9$' 61■� osv ■ xYa�Milli# �■• �� r.�i`ir � -�uSS*1�'ASiblRi961�a ��jd'�.rg,,T rrrE �r r 90Q aw�. d ° Xtte l4�kRltA 6 � ,� I,IN A ��S i �x o-x. RRZ� liN b� � R,ii c.c. 5.1 EXPENDITURES DATA 1980/81 Metzger/Wash. Sq. Tigard Population - 5,445 Population - 14,855 Total Per Total Per Expenditure Capita Expenditure Capita 141,810 26.04 Public Saf. d12,700 54.70 19,350 3.55 Finance 12.8,857 8.67 53,573 9.84 Comm. Dev. 649,354 43.71 7,272 1 .33 Admin. 79,205 5.33 33,958 6.23 Parks 120,839 8. 13 13,909 2.55 Library 110,748 7.45 269,872 49.54 Total 1,901,703 121.96 1981/82 Metzger/Wash. Sq. Tigard Population - 5,555 Population-15,750 Total Per Total Peer Expenditure Capita Expenditure Capita 192,360 34.62 Public Saf. 955,789 60. 70 29,741 5.35 Finance 206,975 13. 14 63,414 11.41 Comm. Dev. 849,073 53 .90 8,431 1.51 Admin. 127,085 8.06 38,786 6.92 Parks 103,459 6.56 16,120 2.90 Library 135,048 8,57 348,852 62.71 Total 2,377,429 150.93 1982/83 Metzger/Wash. Sq. Tigard Population - 5,675 Population 1.8,000 Total Per Total Per Expenditure, Capita Expenditure Capita 222,569 39.21 Public Saf. 1,034,428 57.46 29,741 6.61 Finance 301.,879 16.77 120,667 21.26 Comm. Dev. 951,528 52.86 8,431 1.61 Admin, 154,184 8,56 38,796 6.74 Parks 67,927 3 .77 14,772 _ 2.60 Library 149,435 _, 8.30 434,966 78,03 Total 2,659,381 147.72 54 1983/84 Metzger/Wash. Sq. Tigard Population 5,790 Population - 18.200 Total Per Total Per Expenditure Capita Expenditure Capita 209,566 36.19 Public_ Saf. 1,130,715 62.12 42,169 7.28 Finance 370,839 20.37 108,761 18.78 Comm. Dev. 1,077,356 59. 19 12,128 2.09 Admin. 168,500 9.25 39,030 6.79 Parks 53,030 2.91 175,980 9.66 16,366 2.82 Library 2,976,420 163 .50 428,020 73.95 Total 1984/85 Metzger/Wash. Sq. Tigard Population - 5,940 population 19,000 n Total Per Total Per Expenditure Capita Expenditure Capita 197,950 33.32 Public Saf. 1,330,500 70.02 48,816 8.21 Finance 389,500 20.50 120,631 20.31 Comm. Dev. 1,269,073 66.79 12,684 2. 13 Admin. 168,500 8 .86 48,773 8.21 Parks 55,00 3 .05 17,000 2.86 Library _ 228,824 15.20 445,854 75.04 Total 3,501,397 184.42 (1) Public Safety - (a) 60% of Administration plus operation times 0375 (eyui.valent population of unincorporated Wash. Co.) . (b) 40% of Administration plus jail. time 07..I_ (equlvalr.nt population of Wash. Co.) . (2) Comm. Dev. - Total. Expend. ti.me .0375 (equivalent. population of unincorporated Wash. Co.) . (3) Parks - Total expenditure of Metzger ParkSpecial Assessment District. (4) Library - 25% of West Slope library operations. (5) Finance and Admin. -- Total expenditure of budget. times 022 (equivalent population of Wash. Co.) . SOURCE: Washington County Annual Budget Tigard Annual Budget 55 �g �t PROPERTY TAX VERSUS PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE For the purpose of comparison, the amount of property taxes paid versus the total per capita expenditure effort was evaluated. During this period, the average residence paid $893.75 in property taxes and received about $764.39 in expenditure effort per residence or a net loss of $129.36. The years 1981/82 and 1982/13 showed a net subsidy to other Washington County areas (primarily due to the roads serial levy) . During the same period, Tigard property owners had a net positive return of $1,369.28 (property tax - $334.75, expenditures per residence -- $1704.03). PROPERTY TRX/PER CAPITA EFFORT General Gov't. Property Tax Vs. Household Expenditure Effort (1) Metzger/Wash. Co. Tigard 1980/81 1.65 x 65 = 107.25 .60 x 65 = 39.00 49.54 x 2.2 = 10_08 999 127,99 x 2.2 = 28 1981/82 4.23 x 65 = 274.95 1.19 x 65 = 77.35 62.71 x 2.2 = 137.96 150.93 x 2.2 = 332.05 <136.99> 254.70 1982/83 4.02 x 65 = 261.30 1.12 x 65 = 72.80 78.03 x 2.2 = 171.66 147.72 x 2.2 = 324.98 1983/84 1.88 x 65 = 122.20 1.18 x 65 = 76.70 359.70 73.95 x 2.2 = 1 �9 163.50 x .'..2 - m. 1984/85 s 1.97 x 65 = 128.05 1.06 x 65 = 68.90 75.04 x 2.2 = 165.09 184.42 x 2.2 = 405.72 (1) Based upon Assessed Valuation of $65,000 and 2.2 Residents. PROPERTY TAX/PER CAPITA EFFORT Tigard/Washington Co. Property Tax Vs. Household Expenditure Effort (1)(2) 1980/81 1.65 + .60 x 65 = 146.25 138.02 x 2.2 = 303.64 Ia739 4.23 + 1.19 x 65 = 35Z.30 164.80 x 2.2 = 362.34 10.04 4.02 + 1.12 x 65 = 334.10 161.63 x 2.2 = 355599 .49 1.88 + 1.18 x 65 = 198.90 178.33 x 2.2 = 392.33 193.43 1.97 + 1.06 x 65 = 196.95 199.86 x 2.2 = 439.69 $' (1) Excludes Wash. Co. Expenditures for Parks, Library and Community Development. (2) Based upon Assessed Valuation of $65,000 and 2.2 Residents. 56 r ¢ C6 ¢ 10 L 4 �•�i �D h z .••� Z�In O n In T�l °° .. @ G T hN o .sol \ S U P m @ C 2 I Cp .D ¢ st ¢ ¢ 'IT P .O t°l P O P A: 3 t1� = Z ' C P '. O O O m O 1+ �x',� X61 67 Q n1 M G �O Cy S f'! i61 CO 161 T G O i N 161m (n cr, O W P N N N h I ¢ rJ ¢ ¢ 6c1@ @L a .0 10 Z .-+ Z ZO Co .D T Ni40 C* 111.-+ @ G ro .LI N In ^� \ S U th C9 Go @ P N @ ¢ CP ¢ ¢ P !� h J' Cn O CS, a, \ \ \ @ O h to - - h ,+9 @ h '. c @ o Z o z Z sr •T G N In.. rmi r G 4n LM m` O r v h r1 1.2 ' Q fn \� ¢{� N 1+0'9 b C�� M .gyp v 't m .o ui Z .+ z Zi 6•i a m ro N N 47, in @�-+ k U \ .-i U \ 4 U 6V NL W1.4 U 10 S2 P ¢ ..+ ¢ ¢ .-, .LOM g .-1 P to CD to .,1•, '-. C N t�f Z C�` Z Z uNi c+ c aC O M .-+ .+ N aC O x .•+ P Cis .•+ .-+ O� L o r w w F "' rs LnL VL Z JC r h C ¢ d ¢ ¢I L T W r i tom• @ O N �0 h O 9 L .+ .. s X L .., @ r. o, u+ u1 u1 M w 10 N h en .+ :� .•+ w N G h co r, 0, .n co P o s u @ .-+ t- C a s u .a .4 In co t y Cn .. \ \ \ O w G 9@ h@ In I N O .•. z Q, z z .• C •• a o a v In LL C J C @@ T Om to P 0 y @ N .a O 'D ¢ m G .O CO % to O fl�T C. O 7 , Ic- CD ro in 1n q r'1 ¢ E M •.� G� ¢ i h (\ .D :l In Cr U L +n 6n Z N Z O • w V H L C� N n .0 9 h CD .+ ..� - N G u @ c v 40@ N a co x i r q c in" h Z @ z Zj i1i @ In x ,v 6 n UN P+ 4z 447 X w c@ Q a, rl., -+�In w c �0 C x ¢ w N L 1 ¢ N 3J � �.+ r Com+ N T N N G ro •a 4G- 17 > _ N G a v T V1 V X G O T LS ,:'l. W T U L x W .p •.a 1 L •'I. ' ce 57 5.2 REVENUES This section includes all correspondence in reference to revenue estimates from outside agencies. _i "i s; 58 ® a� C Portland Geral EkecWc Company December 20, 1985 Robert W. Jean, Administrator City of Tigard PO Box 23397 Tigard OR 97224 Dear Bob: The estimate for 1985 of the annual franchise fee that would be paid for the area described in your Urban Services Study of the Metzger/Washington Square area is approximately $150,000. From the map you provided, we found 12 different meter routes some of which are entirely within the proposed area and others only partially inside. Using a percentage estimating factor on the books only partially in the area, we calculated the revenue on which we would be paying a franchise fee to be approximately $4,300,000. Although this is only an estimate, we are confident that it will provide a suitable figure for use in your planning• Best regards, dWA- Chuck McClellan General Manager Western Division CM/9th3.2A3 41 59 �` aitt)t•fiij i f?�E•FJ tl:)t)t.' CQ'!ti .ei �' �< tht, Nortlivv est inc December 18, 1985 Robert W. Jean City Administrator City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Jean: This is in reply to your letter of December 6, 1985, requesting fran- chise fees information within your Urban Services Study of the Metzger/ Washington Square area. Based on the estimated services within the area designated by the map you furnished and a 3% franchise fee, the estimated amount of revenue is $14,358.79. We estimate the annual revenue for our services t within the prescribed area to be $478,626.24. If additional information is desired, please advise. Sincerely, J. E. Sherar Vice President - General Manager 60 . I.i TCI CABLE TELEVISION THE NEW LIBERTY CABLE TV 02S SW ShW—•PO Bu 66"a PonLa d.OR 97207•5032:5-1964 December 12, 1985 Mr. Robert W. Jean City Administrator City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Jean: This is in response to your December 6 inquiry about the Metzger/Washington Square area. Based on the City's estimate of 2500 homes in the study area, 1 estimate that we pay Washington County approximately $5200 in annual franchise fees from cable television service provided to horses in the area. Sincerely, 1 Dave Reynolds Area Manager DMR:eaf cc: Michael McCloskey William Tierney �a 61 A- 4FMETROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 12655 SAV ('enter Sweet • Suite 1,)O . Iieavertoni OIL 1)7OO5 1601 .(513) 0.11 -()21,X January 8, 1986 Mr. Brian Hartung City of Tigard P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Brian : Storer Metro Communications built their cable system in part of Metzger in fulfillment of the Franchise Agreement requirement to test market in the TCI-Liberty service area. The area in which they built is bordered by Greenburg Road on the west, Oak Street on the south , and Hail Boulevard. a: I would estimate they have 100 to 150 subscribers which would generate $1 ,000 to $1 ,400 in franchise fees annually. Sincerely, William J . Tierney Administrator WJT: jyh C, 2 F Y s 62 7 Specialized Container Service coMroct—Monthly 5150 S.W. Alger Street Beaverton, OR 97005 December 10, 1985 Robert W. .lean City Administrator 12755 S.W. Ash P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 971223 Dear Mr. Jean, Due to the time constraints vour correspondence required, it would be nearly impossible to comply with your request with any degree of accuracy, but I can offer an estimate which should serve well as a ''work-up" figure. After consulting your map of the area in question, I estimate the revenues (by way of franchise fees) currently generated to be $375.00 to $400.00 per month. This estimate is based on the rates currently beim, paid in the area, a copy of which is enclosed per your request. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Tom Miller Miller's Sanitary Service, Inc. CC/on file 63 3 5.3 METHODOLOGY I. Expenditures Washington County and City of Tigard Budget documents for the periods 1980/1081 through 1984/1985 were examined for actual or budgeted operational expenditure in categories relaying to the provision of urban services. Actual expenditures reported were used when available. A. Categories examined were: 1 . Public Safety -- This relates to the provision of Police and jail services of both Washington County and the City . 2. Finance - All. expendi.Lures relating to provision of Accounting, Auditing, Financial Management, Data Processing and Word Processing services. 3. Community Development - All expenditures relating to services in the areas of Building and Zoning, Engineering, Planning, Public Works and Surveying. 4 . Administration - Al.l costs rcalatirig to general administration, governing bodies and related functions , 5. Parks - All costs relating to operation of the MoLzger Park and City of Tigard Park Systsam. 6. Library - All. costs relating to operation of the City of Tigard Library System .and 25% of operation of the WCCLS WesL Slope Library. B. Expenditure Breakout Washington Co. Expenditures as they relate to provision of services in the Metzger/Washington Square area were formulated as follows: 1. Public Safety - 100% of Patrol/Operations cost's plus 60% of Administration multiplied by .03/5 (population proportionate to the unincorporated population of Washington County) plus 100' of jail costs plus 40% of administration multiplied by .022 (population proportionate to than total population of Washington C.ourity). 2. Finance - Total costs multi.pl.i.ed by .022 (secs above) . 3 . Community Development To Lal costs multiplied by .0375 (see above) . 4. Administrati.ori - Total costs multiplied by .022 (see above). 5. Parks -- Total costs of operation of the Metzger Park. " 6. Library — Total cost of operation of WCCLS West Slope Branch multiplied by 25%. . 64 AREA i'I1Ur iLE 198U 11/14/85 DE LISION 5'z STEMS, !NC:. 11/14/85 TRACT (ST 41, CTY 67 ) 319.02 PULATION 6828 RACE: Black 0.4% HOUSEHOLD INCOME % Other 2.9% 0-10T 255 11. 1 Grp 4trs 0.0% 10-20T 591 25.8 r 1874 20-25T 411 18.0 HOUSEHOLDS 2290 FAMILIES 13.4 W/children 64.4% 25-3 294 12.8 1 Person T 289 12.6 2 Person 30.7% Marr Couples 87.4 30-355T 178 7.8 3-4 Person 42.5% W/children 62.7% 35-40T 179 7 .8 5+ Person 13.4% Avg Family Size 3. 31 40-7 72 3.1 Avg Hshld Size 2.98 NONFAM HSHLDS 18.2$ 75T+5TT 22 1.0 SPANISH ORIGIN 1.1% IN ARMED FORCES 0.0% Median $ 23358 Average $ 26357 AGE % OCCUPATION 0-5 636 9. 3 Prof/Tec 633 18.5 AGG. INCOME 60 .4M 6-13 1047 15,3 Mgr/Prop 593 17 . 3 14-17 562 8.2 Clerical 569 16.6 SCHOOL YRS COMPLETED 18-20 308 4.5 Sales 479 14 . 0 Pop Age 25+ 3865 21-24 410 6.0 WH/COL 2274 66. 3 Median Sch Yrs 13. 3 25-34 1457 21. 3 Crafts 372 10. 9 High Sch Only 52. 3% 262 7 35-44 1122 16.4 Opertivs 1 . 4 Any College 45-54 572 8.4 Service 262 7 .7 55-64 429 6.3 Laborer 113 3. 3 18-34 IN COLLEGE 18.8 0 .5 65+ 285 4.2 Farm Wrk 54 1154 Median 28.4 BL/COL 33.7 VOEHICLES/HSHLD35 1 .5 $ LABOR FORCE UNEMP PARTIC 1 634 27 .7 SEX 1030 45,0 e 3371 49. 4 2043 2 . 86 . 2 591 25.8 Ft-inale 3457 50.6 1510 5. 00$% 59 .99$% 3+ HOUSING UNITS 2419 HOUSING VALUE 15 1$0 GENT 5 0.8 Owner-Occ 68.9% 0-30T 92 15. 1 Renter-Occ 25.8$ 30-SOT 88 5.8 100-199 243 40 .0 Vac/Yr-Rnd 5. 3% 50-80T 860 56 .6 200-299 Vac/Season 0.0% 80-100T 376 24 .8 300-399 178 29 . 3 Condominiums 72 100-150T 160 10 . 5 400-499 72 11.8 Mobile Homes 1 150T+ 20 1 . 3 di 9 1 . 5 287 Me Stability 36.5% Median $ 72901 Median $ 298 Turnover 14 . 4% Average S 77285 Average $ 's BUILT % UNITS/STRUCTURE % MOVED IN 83 . 0 1970-80 52 .7 1 1951 80 .6 1970-80 13 . 3 1960-69 32 . 1 2 92 3 .8 1960-69 2 .9 1950-59 9 .0 3-4 75 3. 1 1950-59 <--1949 6 . 2 5+ 302 12 . 5 <--1949 0 .8 S ce: 1980 Census _ _ ___ (�' (A d� _ ___ _ __ --------------- -- ---------------------- Urban Decision Systems/PO Box 25953/Los Angeles , CA 90025/( 213 ) 820-8931 }` 65 AREA PRUi'ILE: 1980 URBAN DECISiUN 5Y`3'rEM5, 1NC;. 11/14/85 TRACT (ST 41, CTY 67) 307 .00 IrPULATION 1392 RACE: Black 0. 4% HOUSEHOLD INCOME % Grp Qtrs 0.0% Other 3.0% 0-10T 157 27 .9 10-20T 169 30. 1 HOUSEHOLDS 563 FAMILIES 364 20-25T 91 16. 2 1 Person 25.4% W/children 50.0% 25-30T 17 3.1 2 Person 37.1% Marr Couples 86. 3% 30-35T 54 9 . 6 3-4 Person 29.8% W/children 47.5% 35-40T 27 4 .8 5+Person 7.6% Avg Family Size 3.03 40-50T 20 3.6 Avg Hshld Size 2.47 NONFAM HSHLDS 35. 3% 50-75T 22 3.9 75T+ 5 0.9 SPANISH ORIGIN 2.7% IN ARMED FORCES 0.0% Median $ 17282 Average $ 20149 AGE % OCCUPATION % 0-5 122 8.8 Prof/Tec 64 8.7 AGG. INCOME 11. 3M 6-13 131 9. 4 Mgr/Prop 93 12. 6 14-17 86 6. 2 Clerical 137 18. 6 SCHOOL YRS COMPLETED 18-20 97 7 .0 Sales 89 12. 1 Pop Age 25+ 796 21-24 160 11.5 WH/COL 383 52.0 Median Sch Yrs 12.9 25-34 251 18.0 Crafts 94 12 .8 High Sch Only 40.0% 35-44 152 10.9 Opertivs 136 18. 4 Any College 45.5% 45-54 138 9.9 Service 87 11 .9 55-64 124 8.9 Laborer 36 4.9 18-34 IN COLLEGE 18.7$ 65+ 131 9.4 Farm Wrk 0 0.0 Median 28. 5 BL/COL 353 48.0 VEHICLE S/HSHLD 0 75 13. 3 SEX % LABOR FORCE UNEMP PARTIC 1 167 29.7 e 698 50. 1 430 1 .8% 78.7% 2 185 32.8 «sale 694 49.9 348 9 .8% 63. 1% 3+ 137 24 . 3 HOUSING UNITS 605 HOUSING VALUE % RENT % Owner-Occ 44.6% 0-30T 5 2. 2 0-99 1 0 . 3 Renter-Occ 48.4% 30-50T 30 12 .9 100-199 50 17. 3 Vac/Yr-Rnd 6.9% 50-80T 125 53 . 9 200-299 208 72.0 Vac/Season 0.0% 80-100T 51 22 . 0 300-399 19 6 . 6 Condominiums 0 100-150T 17 7 . 3 400-499 5 1 . 7 Mobile Homes 26 150T+ 4 1 . 7 500+ 0 0. 0 Stability 42.6% Median $ 69440 Median $ 232 Turnover 8.6% Average $ 73125 Average $ 238 UNITS/STRUCTURE % MOVED IN BUILT % 1 369 61 . 0 1970-80 73 . 6 1970-80 6 . 3 2 0 0 . 0 1960-69 14 . 7 1960-69 51 . 3 3-4 21 3. 4 1950-59 7 . 7 1950-59 25 . 5 5+ 215 35. 6 <--1949 4 0 <--1949 16 . 9 Sd. -'ce: 1980 Census ------------ ----------------------------- --------------------(AP) sUrban Decision Systems/PO Box 25953/Los Angeles, CA 90025/( 213) 820-8931 66 AREA PROFILE: 1980 URBAN DECISION SYSTEMS, INC. TRACT (ST 41, CTY 67 ) 308. 00 11/14/85 PULATION 7805 RACE: Black 0 . 1% HOUSEHOLD INCOME % Grp Qtrs 1. 5% Other 2. 6% 0-10T 643 19. 4 10-20T 959 28.9 HOUSEHOLDS 3317 FAMILTCS 2259 20-25T 420 12. 7 1 Person 26. 2% W/children 39.0% 25-30T 387 11.7 2 Person 43.0% Marr Couples 86.9% 30-35T 322 9.7 3-4 Person 24. 2% W/children 34 . 4% 35-40T 178 5.4 5+ Person 6. 5% Avg Family Size 2.79 40-50T 217 6.5 Avg Hshld Size 2. 32 NONFAM HSHLDS 31.9% 50-75T 125 3.8 75T+ 67 2.0 SPANISH ORIGIN 1.6$ IN ARMED FORCES 0.0% Median $ 20660 $ AGE % OCCUPATION $ Average 23839 0-5 532 6.8 Prof/Tec 606 15.6 AGG. INCOME 79.6M 6-13 695 8.9 Mgr/Prop 695 17 .8 14-17 427 5. 5 Clerical 889 22.8 SCHOOL YRS COMPLETED 18-20 364 4.7 Sales 422 10.8 Pop Age 25+ 5249 21-24 538 6.9 WH/COL 2613 67 . 1 Median Sch Yrs 13.2 25-34 1202 15. 4 Crafts 430 11 .0 High Sch Only 33 . 2% 35-44 805 10. 3 Opertivs 461 11 .8 Any College 51.7% 45-54 826 10. 6 Service 316 8 . 1 55-64 1017 13. 0 Laborer 69 1 .8 18-34 IN COLLEGE 20.7% 65+ 1399 17. 9 Farm Wrk 6 0. 2 Median 36.8 BL/COL 1283 32.9 VEHICLES/HSHLD % 0 111 3.3 SEX % LABOR FORCE UNEMP PARTIC 1 1463 44. 1 � e 3718 47.6 2150 2. 3% 73 .3% 2 1151 34.7 ttna1e 4087 52. 4 1847 2.8% 53.7% 3+ 592 17.8 HOUSING UNITS 3578 HOUSING VALUE % RENT % Owner-Occ 58.2% 0-30T 36 2. 3 0-99 17 1. 4 Renter-Occ 34.5% 30-50T 73 4 . 7 100-199 100 8. 2 Vac/Yr-Rnd 7.2% 50-80T 632 40. 7 200-299 841 69 . 3 Vac/Season 0.1% 80-100T 509 32. 8 300-399 173 14. 3 Condominiums 266 100-150T 271 17 . 4 400-499 59 4.9 Mobile Homes 214 150T+ 33 2 . 1 500+ 8 0.7 Stability 35.9% Median $ 81415 Median $ 262 Turnover 8.8% Average $ 84438 Average $ 267 UNITS/STRUCTURE % MOVED IN % BUILT 1 2328 65. 1 1970-80 84 . 6 1970-80 58. 1 2 86 2. 4 1960-69 11 . 1 1960-69 27. 6 3-4 165 4. 6 1950-59 2 . 7 1950-59 5. 1 5+ 999 27. 9 •<--1949 1 . 6 <--1949 9. 2 Sciti. "ce: 1980 Census ------------------------------ __ P) ; Urban Decision Systems/PO Box 25953/Los Angeles, CA 90025/( 213) 820-8931 t 57 ate_ AREA YFROFiLE: 1980 URBAN UF.C:ISiON SYSTEMS, INC. 11/14/85 TRACT (ST 41, CTY 67 ) 309 .00 PULATION 3563 RACE: Black 0. 5% HOUSEHOLD INCOME % Grp Qtrs 0. 2% Other 3.9% 0-10T 457 27 . 7 10-20T 681 41. 3 HOUSEHOLDS 1648 FAMILIES 904 20-25T 205 12. 5 1 Person 33. 2% W/children 50. 1% 25-30T 148 9.0 2 Person 38.8% Marr Couples 74 .9% 30-35T 51 3. 1 3-4 Person 23. 2% W/children 42. 4% 35-40T 39 2.4 5+ Person 4.7% Avg Family Size 2.78 40-50T 34 '2.0 Avg Hshld Size 2.16 NONFAM HSHLDS 45. 1% 50-75T 19 1. 1 75T+ 13 0.8 SPANISH ORIGIN 1 .9% IN ARMED FORCES 0 . 3% Median $ 15464 Average $ 17389 AGE % OCCUPATION % 0-5 314 8.8 Prof/Tec 279 13. 9 AGG. INCOME 28.7M 6-13 258 7. 2 Mgr/Prop 146 7 . 3 14-17 163 4.6 Clerical 402 20. 1 SCHOOL, YRS COMPLETED 18-20 291 8. 2 Sales 321 16.0 Pop Age 25+ 1999 21-24 538 15.1 WH/COL 1148 57. 3 Median Sch Yrs 12.8 25-34 888 24.9 Crafts 271 13 . 5 High Sch Only 35.0% 35-44 296 8. 3 Opertivs 289 14 . 4 Any College 44 . 4% 45-54 256 7.2 Service 152 7 . 6 55-64 255 7. 2 Laborer 129 6. 5 18-34 IN COLLEGE 14 . 1% 65+ 304 8.5 Farm Wrk 14 0 .7 Median 27.0 BL/COL 855 42 .7 VEHICLES/HSHLD % 0 125 7 . 6 SEX % LABOR FORCE UNEMP PARTIC 1 841 51. 0 K a 1708 47.9 1109 7 . 2% 82 .8% 2 425 25. 8 Female 1855 52. 1 1024 5.0% 65 .7% 3+ 257 15.6 HOUSING UNITS 1793 HOUSING VALUE o RENT % Owner-Occ 25.7% 0-30T 18 4 . 4 0-99 9 0 . 8 Renter-Occ 66. 2% 30-50T 112 27 . 6 100-199 88 7 . 5 Vac/Yr-Rnd 8.1% 50-80T 217 53 . 4 200-299 905 77 . 6 Vac/Season 0.0% 80-100T 36 8 . 9 300-399 138 11 . 8 Condominiums 0 100-150T 18 4 . 4 400-499 15 1 . 3 Mobile Homes 13 150T+ 5 1 . 2 500+ 2 0 . 2 Stability 25.9% Median S 60092 Median $ 251 Turnover 8. 5% Average $ 61352 Average $ 257 UNITS/STRUCTURE $ MOVED IN I BUILT % 1 614 34 . 2 1970-80 84 . 9 1970-80 37 . 1 2 63 3. 5 1960-69 8 . 5 1960-69 34 . 1 3-4 125 7 .0 1950-59 3 . 5 1950-59 13 . 8 5+ 991 55. 3 <--1949 3 . 1 <--1949 15 . 0 So:: 'ce: 1980 Census (AP) Urban Decision Systems/PO Box 25953/Los Angeles, CA 90025/( 213 ) 820-8931 68 s .?.i2EA PROFILE: 1980 URBAN DECISION SYSTEMS, INC. • TRACT (ST 41, CTY 67) 306.00 11/14/85 PULATION 4108 RACE: Black 0. 2% HOUSEHOLD INCOME % Grp Qtrs 0.6% Other 4 .4% 0-10T 262 16.7 10-20T 488 31. 1 HOUSEHOLDS 1566 FAMILIES 1123 20-25T 244 15.6 1 Person 21.6% W/children 53.9% 25-30T 200 12.7 2 Person 35.8% Marr Couples 84.7% 30-35T 132 8.5 3-4 Person 32.9% W/children 51.3% 35-40T 113 7. 2 5+ Person 9.6% Avg Family Size 3.09 40-50T 72 4 ,6 Avg Hshld Size 2.61 NONFAM HSHLDS 28.3% 50-75T 35 2. 2 SPANISH ORIGIN 2.4% IN ARMED FORCES 0.2% Median 20 1. 3 $ 20675 AGE $ OCCUPATION Average $ 22509 $ 0-5 372 9.1 Prof/Tec 445 20.2 AGG. INCOME 35.4M 6 -13 531 12.9 Mgr/Prop 275 12.4 14-17 237 5.8 Clerical 451 20.4 SCHOOL YRS COMPLETED 18-20 221 5.4 Sales 246 11.1 Pop Age 25+ 2418 21-24 329 8.0 WH/COL 1417 64.1 Median Sch Yrs 12.9 25-34 938 22.8 Crafts 234 10.6 High Sch Only 38.6% 35-44 525 12.8 Opertivs 292 13.2 Any College 46. 2% 45-54 345 8. 4 Service 210 9.5 55-64 307 7. 5 Laborer 45 2.0 18-34 IN COLLEGE 13. 3% 65+ 303 7. 4 Farm Wrk 12 0.5 Median 29.0 BL/COL 792 35.9 VEHICLES/HSHLD $ SEX 0 105 6.7 % LABOR FORCE UNEMP PARTIC 1 508 32. 4 e 2052 50.0 1267 6.0% 82.8% 2 581 37 . 1 emaie 2056 50.0 1055 3.5% 67. 2% 3+ 373 23.8 HOUSING UNITS 1700 HOUSING VALUE $ RENT $ Owner-Occ 61.6$ 0-30T 39 4.1 0-99 9 1 .8 Renter-Occ 30.5% 30-50T 175 18.3 100-199 115 22.6 Vac/Yr-Rnd 7.9% 50-80T 512 53.4 200-299 231 45. 5 Vac/Season 0.0$ 80-100T 101 10.5 300-399 110 21 .7 Condominiums 91 100-150T 105 11.0 400-499 31 6. 1 3 Mobile Homes 3 150T+ 26 2.7 500+ 3 0. 6 Stability 42.3$ Median $ 65527 Median $ 238 Turnover 9.4% Average $ 70628 Average S 257 UNITS/STRUCTURE % MOVED IN $ BUILT $ 1 1264 74. 4 1970-80 79. 2 1970-80 36. 7 2 47 2.8 1960-69 3-4 10 .2 1960-69 21 . 5 54 3. 2 1950-59 6 . 1 1950-59 18. 2 5+ 334 19. 7 <--1949 4 . 5 <--1949 23. 5 t Sb--ti:ce: 1980 Census - -------------------------------- - Urban Decision Systems/PO Box 25953/Los Angeles, CA 90025/( 213) 820-8931 69 5.4 SOURCES Expenditures o City of Tigard Budget - 1980/81, 1981/82, 1982/83, 1983/84, 1984/85 o Washington County - 1980/81, 1981/82, 1982/83, 1983/84, 1984/85 Revenues o City of Tigard Budy^t -- 1985/86 Population 0 1980 Census of Population and Housing U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census August 1983 o Population and housing by Census Tract Portland Metropolitan Area Metropolitan Service District - July 11, 1985 o Center for Population Research 6 Census Portland State University Demographics o Urban Decision Systems, Inc. Los Angeles, CA - November 11, 1985 .. Assessment & Tax Rates o Summary Assessment b Tax Roll Washington County Assessor' s Office 1980/81, 1981/82, 1982/83, 1983/84, 1984/85, 1985/86 Capital. Projects o Metzger-Progress Circulation Study Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation Planning Division August, 1985 Ash Creek Basin Master Plan 70.... ' r ,; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: JanuarV 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM fit: DATE SUBMITTED: January 14, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION, None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance No Parking restriction on SW Ash PREPARED BY: John Hagman--Comm Develo_pVV Avenue REQUESTED BY: Tualatin Rural Fire PD DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _ POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. As the attached request from the the Fire District indicates; the egress—ingress of emergency equipment at Ash Avenue, for response to emergency calls, makes it necessary to create a no—parking zone thereat. 2. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends passing the proposed Ordinance. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION �3 pi Pass the ordiance titled "An Ordinance amending and supplementing Chapter 10.28 of the Tigard Municipal Code by adding to Section 10.28.130 to prohibit k parking on a protion of SW Ash Avenue, declaring an emergency and fixing an x effective date". JH:bs5? ■ !G A IR® & VICINITY r Z.`-�--`_:sT:=�Y a s��__:�: fes--�•4.r0au .! LL DCAlf !N FffT IFA NffNDr9f0 W "14---� 4°tu[• sc 1�� —J_'i`_'-`, .... • O • 16 2i L��-1 � - t sr rar4[LW l._'J. • 1 1 '1 r of • At i�� I oar a� W E IF _:_.__::_- S '� � - f r.Tow 'll 7i La pyo f•f♦- • FROM ST S 4p :11IT W STEVE w ASH AVE. AAO-�iPX/N�s A ! IS II•••�� ..11 I..l of OAK L-_ -AT • '••c ti �~ NpItP DaPpra [ Sf _ .+[7' I11 • IS, = IFr - c '� •' -f; a«II.-TILE ST v - r ' M on. w fr rlSaPp V ` LEWIS » fW L S .. r� _ ' lr. •.N� p„ } 1) (tYvall Sr 7•V 7M t E w « •'P11TK 1 f. ST • ' � S. •1 I ♦ ♦ 16 i� ! • _ a•• \,. .''i /P r f '-illfli[ IN sr ti aN.. 1 44! �-� • ;. u1 tT1I [•R Y f • fesmavM�w.a yRtLp STV ff�, Li f4rur ° fr.arN aT. ♦ ♦ f1[[ �• .,` ,J' 0U'1c030 W O Y rR•A S. y• V L - 41 s _ TO\ • R /� �_ Y t'.Qrr L f 'Sf�. fi}yy • «\ naY11M S r IONM• 'D :t s Q� .a y 5. GN N! t �,�.1° • ■.1 y-;ala. RO fr. 6f,-t� °EEN... D[ F Q .l `4 R SW valMS ST > t• �10 Si f d 7If 4 + d r •� • �•/ sr /\ a •. rp t /! r NII Sr `tib ;I. sr oLua sr I.x sr. yV a' i \ 1 �, / \\\ CK•PY 1 W !. S« '• sr [wEW000 sr. � sa • tr fa■IWa"Er ♦� Sr.Sca • Sw.aEtn Cf .Nt(c sT roy, » J ..4 [r fr y 2!1 sr F ' w ♦ +�j♦+ r Nttv.[r CT •"j 1 M$ D y h MCDONalO Si r , 31. eIw wo[NN• ! S ['—'1 ,111!: •�._ � • a� s E [LOW oNt' CREEK CT s 8 w .•'1l1 cc1'a f� CY aw : s - i 1 /• TaNVICW 4awi • I T r� Q a� r4 ,EP at[ S. Iw[t a7 D S w • 11 r S 1 d &:ii 1 ■i ICtSW *VAIN IE.. ro S = ol IN • ,py I1rEPn' \ .. jy LW I+ 1 tT 1 [:M[•4.0 N1f. Ow II LW N SATTLER T. post S. "OOOVIEW �0 1! 1 1 1 S• SW ■aB E ST •L l - IS i aI Z 1 .. 11 �1 aw■ 1� �-:. ► i W +� DRIVE .."I f IY r •pwRlwN IL ,: •l' % O tT 112 1r.r.NIr 11. 1 4/ 1 ti c.....nw r•1 c.-... L 11 SW ,1. _a '`r. yr wr Pp • 114 1. D11•Nar PTI -__ 1 I _ tt ��0. ' MIRINHE -Pfl. RIM P.O. BOX 127 • TU ALATIN OREGON 97062 • PHONE 682-2601 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF , November 25, 1985 r Mr. Bill Monahan City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 E Dear Mr. Monahan: The Tualatin Fire District is requesting to have "No Parking" signs installed along th- iortion of Ash Street which is adjacent to the ' fire district property on Commercial Street. F The purpose for this request is that we are responding emergency equipment from the back engine bay which has its access onto Ash Street. This would greatly reduce any possibility of an accident occurring when these vehicles are responding and provide much better visibility for the drivers. I had contacted Jerry McNuriin to discuss these possibilities and Jerry stated there appears to be no problem with this, however, that requests for "No Parking" signs did take City 'i Council action and approval and that I should submit my request through you to the City Council . I would be most appreciative if you would submit this request to the City Council on behalf of the Tualatin Fire District. Should there be any additional information or requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, o c wart Division Chief, Support Services JS/rg ' r x � C F �r �k CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY / j AGENDA OF: January 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM ##: d 0, DATE SUBMITTED: January 7, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Code Revisions PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson L REQUESTED BY: Loreen Wilson DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: tic � CITY ADMINISTRATOR �.,_ POLICY ISSUE Whether Tigard Municipal Code sections should be in compliance with State of Oregon mandates. ^� INFORMATION SUMMARY The 1985 Legislative Session saw many changes in the elections laws of the State. One of these changes requires cities to use petition forms, which are designated by the Secretary of State, for all city candidates. Since TMC Sections 2.40.010 and 2.40.020 are in conflict with the new law, staff has prepared an ordinance to amend these sections and bring them into conformance with state law. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve ordinance as drafted. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to approve ordinance. lw/3594A ;M CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON (F COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 20 1986 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: January 7,, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: 11/5/85 Charter ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Code Revisions Amendments PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson { t -' REQUESTED BY: Tim Ramis l DEPARTMENT HEAD OK. t� s ti_ i ,; CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE The Council has determined that if a Councilor wishes to file for the Mayor's term of office, and that Councilor's term of office would overlap that of the Mayor's, the Councilor must file a resignation for his existing term. INFORMATION SUMMARY The voters approved the clarifying changes made to Section 7 of the Charter at the November 5, 1985 election. Those changes necessitate one change to the ordinance which deals with filing for the Mayor's position by Councilors. Legal Counsel recommended the addition to the ordinance as outlined below at a meeting in August, 1985. Council direction at that time was to change the ordinance if the Charter amendment was approved. 2.40.030 New subsection (1) — renumber existing subsections (1) and (2) and (2) and (3). "(1) At the time of filing, any council erson filing for mayor whose term would overlap with that of ma or shall submit a resi nation in the form required by the Charter; and" ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve ordinance as presented. 2. Modifiy ordinance. 3. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION k Motion to approve ordinance as presented. 4. lw/3592A g CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON _ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 20 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: January 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLF_: Code Revision Restriction of Access Rights PREPARED BY: Attorney C. Corrigan REQUESTED BY: Lieutenant (Wheeler DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLTCY ISSUE Should the Police Department have the authority to restrict access to areas whever a threat to the public health or safety is created or when a crime area is under investigation? INFORMATION SUMMARY The Police Department has experienced some difficulties in securing crime areas during investigations and areas where there is an armed person or hostage situation. In order to more clearly give authority for the ranking j officer in the field, it is suggested the code be amended to speak to this issue specifically. The City Attorney's office has worked in conjunction with the Police Department to develop the attached ordinance. A violation of this Chapter would be charged as a Class A Misdemeanor. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the ordinance. 2. Modify the ordinance. 3. Deny the ordinance. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the ordinance as attached. lw/3585A ti s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUEfAGENDA TITLE: Notice of Decision M 15-85 & MLP 18-85 - Pacific Realty PREPARED BY: Community Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: /�/�2 .,�J�J J CITY ADMINISTRATOR: saaaa:saasasaa=aaaaaaaaaxa aaaaaasaaxa:aaaaaamaaaaasaaaasaaaaaaaasaaasaaasaaaass: POLICY ISSUE saaaasaasasasasaaaasasasaaaaa=aaaaasaa asa.asaaaaaaaasaaxacaaaaasa aaaaaaa:aaaasaaa f INFORMATION SUMMARY l Attached is the Notice of Decision for M 15-85 and MLP 18-85 for Pacific Realty Assoc., to adjust three parcels of 6.24, 6.04, 1.52 acres into three parcels of 6.13, 5.85, and 1.38 acres each; with the 6.15 acre parcel proposed to be divided into two parcels of 2.99 and 3.14 acres, and the 5.86 acre parcel into three parcels of 2.14, 1.68, and 2.04 acres. Located at the southwest corner of 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. _ asss:s:asaaasassaaa:ssass:a:as:a:sasassasassass:assa:asaaaa:assay:aasasssaaaasaa ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for Council review at a later date. sssaasasaasasaaasaaaasasaaaaaaaaaaaa=aaaaaaasaassssssasaassaasaaaas:aassassaaaa i SUGGESTED ACTION { Receive and file. r , MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council January 15, 1986 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator �1 SUBJECT: Temporary Position for Community ssistant In response to the Town Nall meeting and Community Survey, one of the 1986-87 Council Goals is Establish a Community Information and Involvement Program". With Council consent, I believe we can begin to work towards this community involvement and volunteerism assisted goal within existing staff levels and budgets. A temporary analyst position in my Office working on the Metzger/Washingt:on Square Study can be redirected to assist with the following: o Assistant to Boards & committees on Work Plans. . . . o Reactivation of NPO's and assistance in redefining an expanded t community involvement role for the NPO's. . . o Volunteerism program assistant to increase the number of Police Reserves, Library and City Nall volunteers, and to organize Parks volunteers. . . o Support the Metzger/Washington Square CPO annexation study efforts and facilitate neighborhood information meetings when requested. . . o Conduct training and orientation for Board and Committee members. . . o Provide public information through Newsletter, Press Releases, and Cable TV programs. . . All of this can be accomplished within existing budget levels savings in the Council budget due to the temporary vacancies on Council and lower consultant costs in City Administration. No formal action is necessary since the position is temporary. We can try this and then evaluate the effectiveness of the approach before deciding on a regular position in July. BJ:bs56 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 15-85 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 18-85 APPLICATION: Request by Pacific Realty Assoc. to adjust three parcels of 6.24, 6.04, and 1.52 acres into three parcels of 6.13, 5.85, and 1.38 acres each. Also, the 6.15 acre parcel is proposed to be divides: into two parcels of 2.99 and 3.14 acres and the 5.86 acre parcel into three parcels of 2.14, 1.68, and 2.04 acres. The property is zoned I—L (Light Industrial) and is located at the southwest corner of 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 13AB, T.C. 101, 600, 1200) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions. The findings ano conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background On 1983, Site Design Review approval was granted by the City to construct three industrial buildings within what is now Tax Lot 600 (SDR 12-83) . A second approval was received in 1984 to construct two additional buildings on Tax Lot 1200 and to adjust / the size of Tax Lots 1200, 1300 and 1400 to permit the extension L of Durham Road (SDR 15-84). Building permits have been issued for all five buildings. 2. Vicinity Information The property is bordered by the new Durham Road extension, Upper Boones Ferry Road, 72nd Avenue, and property owned by Washington County on the south. The area to the south is zoned I—P (Industrial Park) and the parcels on the west side of Durham Road and north of Upper Boones Ferry Road contain both I—P and I—L zoning designations while the land east of 72nd Avenue is exclusively zoned I—L. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description As noted above, the property is fully developed. The applicant wishes to adjust the present tax lot boundaries and then divide the three adjusted lots into six parcels so that each of the buildings is located upon a separate lot. The sixth parcel will correspond to the undeveloped area situated at the Upper Boones Ferry/72nd Avenue intersection. NOTICE OF DECISION — M 15-85 & MLP 18-85 — PAGE 1 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: rt a. A plan must be submitted to illustrate how each of the proposed parcels will be served by sanitary and storm sewer facilities. The Tigard Municipal Code requires that individual parcels have access to public facilities. b. The Community Development Code has been interpreted by the City to require full half street improvements as a condition of partitioning approval. The 72nd Avenue L.I.D. provided for all street improvements with the exception of a sidewalk. This should be installed (along with the necessary easement) as a condition of approval. The Building Inspection Division notes that State Plumbing Code requires that each tax lot must be separately served by a public sewer line. The State Highway Division and NPO #5 have no objection to the request. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposed lot line adjustment and minor land partition conform with the relevant Community Development Code provisions pertaining to lot configuration and building setbacks. In order to provide legal access for each parcel, reciprocal easements should be recorded. As indicated above, State and City regulations dictate that each lot must have direct access to public sewer facilities as well as appropriate access to the storm sewer system. T'he applicant must provide documentation that the existing sanitary and storm sewer facilities can meet City standards for individual lots. If the existing improvements cannot meet City standards, the installation of new facilities may be necessary. One remaining issue relates to the provision of a sidewalk along the 72nd Avenue frontage. In 1980, the 72nd Avenue L.I.D. brought about the improvement of the street, except for sidewalks. Recent development proposals (`',DR 12-83 and SDR 15-84) did not receive any conditions related to the installation of a sidewalk along 72nd Avenue as it was thought that the 72nd Avenue LID provided all necessary improvements for the street. The City Council has since re-affirmed its position that full street improvements, including sidewalks, should be a condition of all development and land use proposals, including Site Development Review and partitions. Since the clarification of this issue, the staff is obligated to require the installation of a public sidewalk along the 72nd Avenue frontage. NOTICE OF DECISION - M 15-85 & MLP 18-85 - PAGE,2 In a preliminary meeting regarding other properties in the vicinity of 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road, the applicant and staff M discussed the possibility of not requiring sidewalks on both sides of the street. The staff indicated that such a proposal must be reviewed and approved by City Council. It should take a comprehensive view of the system of sidewalks in the area and include a rationale for the deletion of any sidewalks. The above mentioned sidewalk on 72nd Avenue could certainly be made a part of this evaluation. C. DECISION The Planning Director- approves M 15-85 and MLP 18-85 subject to the following conditions: 1 . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PARTITION/LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. 2. The partition survey and legal descriptions shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. THE CITY SHALL RECORD THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AFTER APPROVAL UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE WITH THE DIRECTOR. l 3 . Standard half-street improvements, namely sidewalks, curbs, driveway aprons. (and relocation of utilities) shall be installed along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements along SW 72nd Avenue shall be built to City of Tigard collector street standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent , improvements. This condition may be deleted if City Council permission is obtained. 4. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the engineering Section for approval. 5. Sanitary sewer plan-profile details for each proposed lot shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. 6. Construction or reconstruction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond, the payment of a permit fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES, BONDING, AND AGREEMENTS. 7. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. Said agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the '. Engineering Section. JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FORMS ARE ENCLOSED. NOTICE OF DECISION - M 15-85 & MLP 18-85 - PAGE 3 8. The "basis of bearings" for the Plat or Survey shall be County Survey 1#20, 223 which is a part of the Tigard Field Survey Network. 9. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: J XX The applicant 6 owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies r 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON January 21 , 1986, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: r i Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be r filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given t and sent. { The deadline for filing of an appeal is 2:30 P.M. 1-21-86 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. PREPARED BY. Keith S. I n, Senior Planner DATE William Monahan, Director of Planning b Development DATE APPROVED (KSL:bsl2300P) NOTICE OF DECISION - M 15-85 6 MLP 18-85 - PAGE 4 mMW GOUNCLL AGENDA ITEM SUfTtARY AGENDA OF: January 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUOMI T-TED: January 15, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Accer)tance of Street ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance Of Dedication on 9/16/85 Correct "Self Service Furniture" PREPARED 8Y: Randy S. Clarno Street Dedication REQUESTED BY. Engineering OEPARTMENT HEAD OK: (�'��- - CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On September 16, 1986, Council accepted this Street Dedication from Self Service Furniture (S.W. Gaarde Street) . However, certain recording problems were encountered and a corrected dedication must now be submitted. Attached please find this corrected dedication. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Engineering recommends that Council accept this corrected Street Dedication. r 4 Him STREET DEDICATION - CORRE(i.ION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Sel` Service Construction-Tigard, a partnership, whose vpartners are Thomas E. Griner, Harold R. Patten, Terry W. Griner; Fred Sauther, Larry A. Giles, Newman D. Sheffield, and Patrick rT. Downey, does hereby dedicate to the Public a perpetual right►-of-way for street, road and utility purposes on, over, across, &der, along and within the following described real property; in Washington County, Oregon: As shown by map and legal description on Exhibit "A" attach- ed hereto and incorporated by reference. To have and to hold the above-descried and dedicated right; unto the Public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor hereby covenants that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to gral:t their rights above- , described, and they will pay all taxes alzd assessments due anri owing on the property. The amount paid for this dedication i)s IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned partnership has cause:l this Street Dedication to be executed by its duly authorized, i undersigned partner acting pursuant td resolution of all tha 1 partners. T SELF SERVICE CONSTRUCTION-TIGARD, a Partners�g BY r Thomas X. Griner Authorised Partner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) +- se. County of Spokane ) Personally appeared Thomas E. Griner who did say that he i the partner authorized to execute this document on behalf of Se l ' Service Construction-Tigard, a partnership, by authority of a; partners and acknowledged said instr nt o be the voluntary ac- and deed of the partnership. NOTAftY)PUBWC 'in a d for the State of Wa ingt+*n, residing at Spokane My Commission expires: 5!2/87 w ACCEPTANCE Approved as to form this D 0 day of e.ovi , 19 By: f' ty A orn y ty of Tigard Approved as to legal description this day of 19 By: t IIU� City/ -C ty of Tigard Su M- Accepted by the City Council this 2.0rhda OK 19 LL. CITY COUNCIL, C TY OF T!ARD, OREGON ByLa ity nprder - C ty of Tigard EX I1IBIT "A" S.W. GAARDE STREET a o >10.00 10 OEOICATION 1.25 1.022) e.fl 10.14 rG ,Qi ' fSSS•31f0 E 03.14 i f r I i POINT Of BEGINNING n O • .� 'N N 1 �1 N. v q m $ i S m r 1.602 ACRES 73,240.472 t4.1 w Q l N P I h t f O A 1 H • `1ti 0#36'03'47"W 104.34 1 i i 7 .7 Legal description of property dedicated by Self Se Fnrnit*ei Inc. ss shown on the above map: 5 - t Legal Description ' A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF L IN THE t(ORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, NGE 1sWEST, W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, EGON C4ON14EYED TO PACIFIC WESTERN BANK BY DEED RECORDED AS CUMEN'P NUMBCR 84- 033842 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DEED R ORDS, SAID. PROTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOL 'WS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHWES RLY LIMEiOF SKID PACIFIC WESTERN BANK TRACT WHICH POINT B S SOUTH 34'30'47" L WEST 10.00 FEET FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY. ORNER •THEREor AND E RUNNING THENCE, SOUTH 55'31'10" EAST ARALLEI, WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUT ST GAARDE STREET ' 183.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23042609 E 10.18. FEET TO A f_ POINTON SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE RTH 55'31~10" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF . WAY LINE 181.25 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID^PACIFIC_WESTE BANK^TRAVe; THENCE s llr � MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and City Council January 15, 1985 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Calendar Update 1/17 Fri. Dinner With Chief and Ex. Staff. . .7:30 p.m. at Stockpot 1/20 Moil. Regular Meeting, Study Agenda & Executive Session 1/28 Tues. Special Meeting, Beaverton-Tigard Council's Workshop, 6 - 9 Stockpot 1/29 Wed. Budget Committee, 7 - 10, Durham Plant Offices. . . 1/30 Thu. Washington County Caucus at Beaverton Library, 7 - 10. . . 2/10 Mon, Regular Meeting, Business Agenda 2/17 Mon. Regular Meeting, Study Agenda 2/22 Sat. Police Chief Assessment Center 2/24 Mon. Regular Meeting, Business Agenda 3/3 Mon. Executive Session, City Administrator Annual Performance Review 3/5 Wed. Budget Committee (Overview) 3/10 Mon. Regular Meeting, Business Agenda 3/12 Wed. Budget Committee (Departmental Reviews) 3/17 Mon. Regular Meeting, Study Agenda 3/19 Wed. Budget Committee (Wrap-up and Recommendation) 3/24 Mon. Regular Meeting, Business Agenda 3/26 Wed. Budget Committee (If needed)? 3/27 Thu. Special Meeting with Tigard School District Board r Council Calendar Update \ January 15, 1985 Page 2 4/7 Mon. Civic Center Dedication Week 4/14 Mon. Regular Meeting - Business Agenda 4/21 Mon. Regular Meeting - Study Agenda 4/25 Fri. Council Training Workshop? 4/27 Sun. 4/28 Mon. Regular Meeting - Business Agenda 5/5 Mon. Regular Meeting - Business Agenda 5/12 Mon. Regular Meeting - Study Agenda 5/19 Mon, Regular Meeting - Business Agenda 5/26 Mon. Memorial Day 6/9 Mon. Regular• Meeting - Business Agenda 6/16 Mon. Regular Meeting - Study Agenda = 6/23 Mon. Regular Meeting - Business Agenda (BJ:pm/1119p) �R. , t CITY OF TIGARD OREGON _ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY J (� AGENDA OF: January 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: January 16, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approval of OLCC Applications PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson REQUESTED BY: Various Applicants DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The following businesses have submitted renewal applications for Council approval: o Floyd & Marine Bergmann, Bergmann's Restaurant, 12725 SW Pacific Highway - R application renewal a Clarence J. Hess & Ho Fung, Lone Oak Restaurant (Shin Shin), 11920 SW Pacific Highway - Class A application renewal o Chow Yuen-Cheung, So William Tat Wing, Lim Yee-Ten, & Chan Loi-Fu, Silver Palace, 14455 SW Pacific Highway - Class A application renewal a Mary A. Dreeszan, Ron's Green Valley Tavern, 12470 SW Main - RMB Application renewal The following business has submitted a new outlet application for Council approval: o Los Baez Restaurant - 11475 SW Pacific Highway (formerly Shakey's Pizza) - New Outlet requesting Dispenser Class C & Restaurant licenses. The Police Department has conducted records and background checks and recommends approval of all applications. M ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve all applications. 2. Approve some applications. 3. Deny applications. ,= SUGGESTED ACTION Approve all applications. lw/3585A CITY®F TIGAW WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON POLICE DEPARTMENT INTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Loreen Wilson DATE: 1-15-86 FROM: Det, Lt. L. Branstetter SUBJECT: Liquor license renewals The following liquor businesses have been checked for the year of 1985 finding them free from violations for that year. Bergmans Restaurant Lone Oak Restaur�rtt Silver Palace Green Valley Tavern Y `aF 9020 S.W.BURNHAM • P.O.BOX 23397•TIGARD,OREGON 97223 • PH:639-6168 MEMORANDUM f`^ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4 TO: Lonnie Branstetter 1/14/86 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Renewal Applications The following applications have been scheduled for the 1/20/86 Council m:de+ing. Please advise me by phone by Noon on Thursday, whether these applico4uns are recommended for renewal. Floyd & Marine Bergmann Mary A. Dreeszan Bergmann's Restaurant Ron's Green Valley Tavern 12725 SW Pacific Highway 12470 SW Main Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 R application RMB application Clarence J. Hess & Ho Fung Lone Oak Restaurant (Shin Shin) 11920 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Class A application Chow Yuen—Cheung, So William Tat Wing, Lim Yee—Ten, & Chan Loi—Fu Silver Palace 14455 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 =' Class A application X lw/3585A MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, ORECA)N TO; Chief of Police 1/7/86 FROM: Loreen Wilson, Recorder )—o SUBJECT: OLCC Application Please review the atLoched 01-CC application and submit a recommendation for Council consideration For the 1/27/86 meeting by 1/22/86. TITO BAEZ, INC.* DESA •- Los Baez Restaurant 11475 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (Formerly: Shakey' s Pizza Parlor) NEW OUTLET APPLICATION FOR DISPENSER PLASS C LICENSE -G-�� c� ,.r Go 4 Y *has done business in City of Salem for a few years. lw/3585A 3 i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Chief of Police 1/7/86 FROM: Loreen Wilson, Recorder SUBJECT: OLCC Application Please review the attached OLCC application and submit a recommendation for Council consideration for the 1/27/86 meeting by 1/22/86. pr TITO BAEZ, INC.* ! DBA - Los Baez Restaurant 11475 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard. Oregon 97223 (Formerly: Shakey's Pizza Parlor) _ NEW OUTLET APPLICATION FOR DISPENSER CLASS C LICENSE - *has done business in City of Salem for a few years. lw/3585A 5 Ti-�u e�t�:ti 1 /�--�s s 7-//V C'- C-1 - r �,�... r � ,s E-- s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council January 10, 1986 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Reclassifications In FY 1986-8Plan Upon further review, two positions need Reclassification within the Pay Plan. These reclassifications would not affect salaries this year since all are well within current ranges. The positions affected are Finance Officer, City Recorder, and Support Services Manager. 1. The Finance Director position would change from range 13 to range 14 and consistent with the new Charter provisions, would be an "at will" employee under the supervision of the City Administrator, but appointed and removed only by Council . Reclassification and appointment would not become effective until acceptance by the Finance Director of these conditions. 2. The City Recorder position is now separated by Charter from the financefunct ons. The position would change from range 10 to range 11. The City Recorder as an officer would also serve "at will" under the supervision of the Finance Officer or City Administrator, but is appointed by and removed only by Council . Reclassification and appoint- inent would not become effective until acceptance by the Deputy City Recorder of these conditions. In a related action, I administratively reclassified the Police Services Manager position from range 10 to range 11 when the incumbent agreed to voluntarily shift from Banker's Retirement at the (17-19.9% cost) to our 401a Plan (at 12%). The City Recorder position and the Police Support Services Manager position have been seen as similar in internal respon- sibility comparisons. Recommended Action: That Council move to appoint as City officers, Finance Director/Acting City Recorder Jerri Widner as Finance Officer, and Acting Deputy City Recorder Loreen Wilson as City Recorder. That the Pay Plan reclassifica- tions per this Memo become effective upon their acceptance of the condi- tions and oaths of office. s ��rjP CIIYOFTIFARD January 21, 1986 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Chairman Wes Myllenbeck and Board of County Commissioners Washington County, Oregon 150 N. First Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97123 Subject: Proposed Washington Co. Law Enforcement Levy Honorable Persons: The City is aware of the Board's commitment to place a law enforcement levy before the voters upon receiving the Washington County Sheriffs Employees Union's petition. Consistent with the City's previously established policy on county-wide measures, the Tigard City Council requests that a tax equity "shareback" to �- cities, of approximately 25% be a part of the measure. The inclusion of a "shareback" is critical to tax equity fairness for our citizens and is, therefore, necessary to receive City support- Sincerely, o E. Cook Mayor BJ:bs56 12765 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 MEMORANDUM ^ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council January 16, 1986 FROM: Joy Martin, Assistant to City Administrator SUBJECT: Computer Purchase Status Report On December 3, 1985 three comprehensive bids in four large boxes were opened. A committee made up of users in each department and Dr. Springer have been busy reviewing the proposals. We have asked each vendor to clarify specific questions and present the information to the committee which occurred December 16. The community development portions of each proposal have been demonstrated to the appropriate people. Dr. Springer has reviewed all hardware proposals and reports each will sufficiently handle the current volumes and five—year volume estimates (these estimates do not include large annexations), The RFP requested a single comprehensive system since it would reduce costs by minimizing duplicated equipment and time for inputting and revising data. At this point it does not appear a single, comprehensive system will be feasible and still have the system satisfy the software requirements. We have therefore outlined a couple of scenarios which we are exploring with the appropriate vendors. The RFP allows us to add or subtract items from the proposals in ord<-!r to develop a city-wide system. If one of the solutions is completed which the committee supports, we will have a recommendation to Council at the February 10 meeting. JM:bs63 R` 'f MEMORANUUM C11Y OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council January 16, 1986 FROM: L.oreen Wilson, Recorder Q,Q._').) SUBJECT: Dartmouth Street LID Engineering Contract Please bring this item from your 1/13/86 Council packet. The agenda item number was 10.7. lw/3585A f` t - r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY I AGENDA OF: January 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM 0: / 1 DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Accepted Project ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution of Compliance Aqrmt 6 Bond(s); Periodic bond reduction during construction. Acceptance with conditions— PREPARED BY: Engineering section � Penn Lawn Estates Subdivision REQUESTED BY: John Hagman DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE w INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The project is located at S.W. 115th Avenue and Cottonwood Lane (i.e. adjacent to Englewood Subdivision. 2. Construction has progressed satisfactorily and periodic "letter of credit (bond)" releases have been permitted as a result thereof. Staff certification that all requirements have been met, subject to installation of the sidewalks and placement of the final overlay on the streets, is hereby tendered. 3. The subdivider has expressed a desire to retain the existing Letter of Commitment performance bond, on file, to assure installation of the balance of the required items and to provide for the requirement of correction of any deficiencies which may arise throughout the one year guarantee period. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that the Council pass the attached Resolution title " RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN PENN LAWN ESTATES SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO HEREIN SPECIFIED CONDITIONS". JH:bs5 Y� CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: January 20, 1986 AGENDA ITEM ,#: f ` DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: Accepted Project ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Penn Lawn Compliance Agreement & Performance Bond Estates Letter of Commitment) PREPARED BY: Engineering Division Partial Bond Release #2 Resolution REQUESTED BY: John Hagman ' DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: L"lia CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The project is located at SW 115th Avenue and Cottonwood Lane (i.e, adjacent to Englewood Subdivision) t 2. Construction has progressed satisfactorily and, subsequently, the developer, Arthur & Associates, has request release of installation guarantee monies for that portion of the work which is complete. 3. Staff has reviewed the request and hereby recommends that the Council authorize release of the amount(s) detailed in the attached summary. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Pass the resolution to authorize release of commitment funds for Penn Lawn Estates Subdivision; authorizing the Mayor and City Recorder to execute a letter in behalf of the City providing for a partial release of installation guarantee monies for Penn Lawn Estates, in the amount of three thousand nine hundred fifty—two dollars and eighty cents ($3,952.80). (JH:bs/2148P) J,,rivary 21 , 198ti '�` CITY ■IGrARD WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON Arthur 6 Associates 8875 Sw Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy. Portland, OR 97225 Attention: Mr. Art Lutz Reference: Penn Lawn Estates (Letter of Commitment Partial Release) Dear Mr. Lutz: In the matter of the seventy one thousand five hundred twenty nine dollar and fifty five cent ($71,529.55) tetter of Commitment between Washington Federal Savings Flank and the City of Tigard, and Arthur & Associates, this is to serve as official notice to allow said Washington Federal Savings Bank to release to Arthur b Associates, a portion of the deposit entrusted to said Washington ! oderal savings Bank. The amount hereby authorized to be released is Lhree thousand nine hundred fifty two dollars and eighty cents ($3,952.80). `,t�fi.s .-,r�+Ay!y;y�'`'ar,E7�"�`"r•,i=,.;.sem... �:->.+a•;s "+s� .s,.ur wr r* �r�":.�w.f, { The amount. to remain entrusted to Washington Federal Savings Bank as a cash `- p-�rformrance bond to assure the Ci Ly Lhat all remaininy reyuircemenLs of ,•aid Subdivision are completed, shall be twenty five thousand one hundred thirty five dollars and seventy one cents ($25,135. 71). This notice, :s.h4ll not . be ,construed to nullify or alter the terms of the aforesaid Letter- of Commitment in any way ; it is merely an authorization to se A por Lion of thv (,ritrusted m"i- , Cit.Y (,,F Tiq.ard, c)rcyun City Kv(.ur'dt'r 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639 4171 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY r AGENDA OF: January 20th, 1986 AGENDA ITEM fit: / DATE SUBMITTED: January 15, 1986 PREVIOUS ACTION: _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Refund for streetlights — Anton Park PREPARED BY: John Haqman, Comm. Dev.� Subdivision REQUESTED BY: Dave Schulz of "Custom Homes by Dave, Inc. ." DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: Zx.) CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Anton Park Subdivision is located at SW 121st Avenue and SW North Dakota Street. 2. The original estimate of streetlighting needs was for twenty—two units (Note Exhibit "A"). The City subsequently collected energy and maintenance fees based on that estimate (Note Exhibit "B"). Final design of the streetlight system, along the new SW North Dakota roadway through the said subdivision and also through the adjacent development project known as Meadowcreek, created a need to modify the original Anton Park lighting plan by reducing the total number of streetlights required therein. 3. Subsequently, the developer of Anton Part Subdivision has requested a refund (Note Exhibit "C"); City staff recommends approval. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize a refund of $829.44 for streetlight energy and maintenance fees, to be paid to "Custom Homes by Dave, Inc.". JH:bs58 Associates, Inc. Aarris-McMonagle EYORs ENGINEERSSU 12555 S.W.HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Telephone(503)639.3453 April 9, 1985 Mr.' John Hagman City of Tigard 12755 S. W. Ash St. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Anton Park (Phase I) Dear John: ry construction cost suuuiary is from the low bid submitted The following prima to construct the iclprovements in Anton Park Phase I . of work are shown under secondary construc- Estimated costs for the other items tion. PRIMARY CONSTRUCTION: Streets $123,110.50 Storm sewer 29,653.16 Sanitary sewer 68,078.55 63,093.85 Water system Sub-Total $283,936.06 • ' SECONDARY CO ON: f. $1 .25 28,768.75 Sidewalks 3, `�� _ „. . 9,280.80 Electric en & t nsformer pads 520.00 Street sig 8 @ $65 0 Asphalt over 1 ton Cd$32.00 34,400.00 (incl . bike path) — GRAND TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $372,305.61 These costs are for construction of the hmproVerojectts wtohSS•WW.1D�SttAvenue�t extending from the north boundary throng p Si cerely ours , r • is Harris-McMonagle Associates, Inc. JRH:ds _ •►i �I FRM CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE COMPUTATION SHEET Imprv.j Project Title: 4�`vin �� Computed By: Date: 1. PROJECT PERMIT FEE (T.M.C. 18.164.150): A. Improvement cost estimate, 3b�4 ZZ-7. (U4, less sanitary sewer. . . .$ (Adjusted Cost) S. 0.04 x $ 30-1 Z-42 ' "' _ . . . . . . . . . . . . - (Ad}usted Cost) 2. SANITARY SEWER MAIN, PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION FEE (Ord. No. 85-02): es A. Cle�wC s�� sc r��t�`pi�caV . . . . . no. (agreement name) g Sewer Improvement cost estimate $ (sewer est.) �,� ©7855 = $ Z7z3.r4 C. 0.04 x $ (fee) 2 z3. ►4 (sewer estimate) (or $100 00 min. , whichever is greater . . . . . . . . .$ 3, STREETLIGHT FEE (T.M.C. 18.164.130 (x) 3.08.010) : Option No. ( % A. P.G.E. Schedule No• _-�---&umen,/Watts to % Type of Lamp �'• ---; Type of Pole _ eight g,4 S. $ 3. x (monthly rate) no• tG,S(o /mo. .4� x = $$(monthly rate, (n $ + 10.56 x 24 months - $ r (subtotal jig 5) (Subtotal poles) 4. TRAFFIC-PEDESTRIAN SIGN FEE (T.M.C. 18.164.030(u): A. Stop: @ e� ch) — (subtotal) (number) B. St. Name:_— @ o0 CIO C. Combo: @ $ ?5, _ $ 450," 0 D. No. Parking: E. — F. 583.zo Sign(s) Total. . . . . . .$ ----- 4n- . . . . . . . . . .$ 1'1 '7 1., 5 f3 5. GRAND TOTAL (FEE'S DUE) . • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . -�(r c�?S Check Cash Date Paid- Receipt aid-Receipt NO. : (�. !T F A5/ -7— �' r C (Pustom i tomes by lave, Inc. YOUR DREAM IS OUR PLAN RT. 3 Box 253 NEWBERG. OREGON 97132 503-639-6310 November 11,1985 City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash Ti ord, Oregon 97223 RE: ANTON PARK ATTN: John ;ragman Dear John, As per our conversation regarding the street lighting at "Anton Park" (phase I) I am enclosing a copy of P.G.E.' s engineered plan. Their plan calls for 14 street lights. Your estimated number of street lights on the public improvement fee computation sheet dated 4-11-85 was 2% Based on that number of street lights, I paid a fee of $2,280.96. I an requesting a refund of $8219.44 based on the actual number (14) of street lights. Thank you for your attention to this matter & for all your invaluable assistance in the successful completion of Anton Park Phase I. I am looking, forward to working with you again on future projects. Yours Truly, Dave Schu z CUSTOM HOMES by DA E, INC. .�•�'� !t /'f ��►Ir — S3 7G `�reCr. Pres. .'�8# X /'� �.rs es �+$ (o.7Z ArZI90.• 44 41VWr;0Wsia/ ti 44 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON January la, 1986 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT; police Chief Job Description and its the als Attached is the revised Job Description asdiscus ed a Councilowill�offeroa incl „ provision. including the at will p I understand basic agreement for "at will employees 1986, Council needs to move After review in Executive Session on January 2O, performance dimension to approve my recommended Jab Description and lection traits. My recommendation is for whatever Council and Helen Terry se 2O, 1986. finalize on January BJ:pm18 POLICE CHIEF GENERAL STATEMENT OF DUTIES: An executive management position as the City's Chief law enforcement officer, manages the City's Police Department and administers the City's law enforcement functions. Coordinates all other related Public Safety functions for the City. SUPERVISION RECEIVED: Appointed and removed by the City Administrator. Serves at will under the City Administrator's discretici as Appointing Authority. Works under the general direction of the City Administrator who occasionally reviews for the goals developed, results obtained and procedures followed. SUPERVISION EXERCISED: Provides general supervisions for all employees assigned to the police department. on will EXAMPLES OF PRINCIPLE DUTIES:the duties singleposition oandi many positionswillinvolve not usually involve all of duties which are not listed.) 1. Directs law enforcement programs consistent with applicable city, county, state and federal laws. anizes and 2. Determines department polic of°chend r policee$; directs, plans,department personnelgconsistent coordinates the activities with police department mission and goals. 3. Provides the full scope of supervisory responsibilities including: assigns, hires, and terminates personnel, adjusts grievances. L. Manages, directs and assists with investigation work where major crimes, accidents and other unusual incidents are involved. 5. Prepares, manages and monitors department budget. 5. Performs periodic inspection of all divisional operations to ensure that departmental goals and objectives are met. 7. Attends conferences and meetings in conjunction with assigned responsibilities. 8. Represents the City before the public. Hears complaints and answers inquiries of the general public. 9. Advises Administrator and Council on Public Safety policy matters. 10. Administrates special programs. 11. Coordinates work with other city departments. 12. Participates in a variety of city organizational meetings on a periodic basis in conjunction with assigned responsibilities. POLICE CHIEF JOB DESCRIPTION Page 2 DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: Knowledge of: Thorough knowledge of modern principles, practices and techniques of police administration, organization and operation, and their _ application to specific situations, technical and administrative phases of crime prevention, juvenile delinquency control; record keeping; the are and custody of persons and property; and city, county, state and federal law. Considerable knowledge of budget preparation and fiscal management. Ability to:_ Plan, direct and coordinate police department activities, establish and maintain effective and harmonious working relationships between divisions and with subordinates, peers and supervisors; deal tactfully with the public, express ideas effectively orally and in writing; accurately develop budgets and estimate projected program costs; interpret law and develop procedures; supervise; establish goals; work with boards and committees. Considerable independent judgment and discretion required. Skills in: Planning and administrating police activities and use of human resources; communicating; supervision. RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: Establishment of permanent residency is required within one hundred twenty days following the end of the probationary period within the boundaries of Clackamas, Multnomah, or Washington County in the State of Oregon. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING: Bachelor's degree in relevant field, eight years and experience with twelve years total law enforcement division level comm experience in comparable sized agencies; or, required minimum of two years college level course work, ten years division level command experience with fifteen years total law enforcement experience in comparable sized agencies. Oregon Board on Police Standards and Training Advanced Certificate or BPST accepted equivalent certificate from other States required; BPST Management and Executive Certificates preferred. Or, any satisfactory equivalent combination of experience and training as determined by the hiring authority. (Revised 1/13/86) (BJ:pm/1156F) MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor Members of the Tigard City Counci FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator 6-V DATE: January 20, 1986-- Executive Session RE: Performance Dimensions -- Police Chief Per your discussions with Helen Terry, the following are the performance dimensions to be considered in selecting a new Police Chief: Public/Community Relations Oral communications Interpersonal Sensitivity Written Communication Skills Planning/Organizing Personnel Management Leadership Skills Creativity/Innovation Budget/Fiscal Administration Problem Solving/Reasoning/Judgment �- Stress Tolerance Adaptability/Flexibility Personal Characteristics/traits It is recommended that you adopt the dimensions listed above.