The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 10/28/1985 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, OCTOBER 28, 1985, 7:00 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are 10865 SW WALNUT asked to be 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. f 1. REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING: lY 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items: Motion to approve as amended 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. BOARD WORKSHOP - PARK BOARD a Council 6 Park Board 4. ANNEXATION PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 85- 0 Councilor Brian 5. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9/85 THF. NORTHWEST TIGARD ANNEXATION, NPO /7 A request by the City gTrip Majority Tigard to consider annexationle•Ma acres into the Cit of Tigard under ORS 199.490(2)(x) Annexations. The land is located south of Old Scholls Ferry Road north of the current western City boundaries and east of SW Murray Blvd. (WCTMd. 40 1S1 33C, Lots 1200, 1100, 601, 602, 604, 600, 603, 500, 502, , , 300, 501, 700, 301, 800, 1301, 1302, 1300, and 1101)- 0 Public Hearing Opened - Continued from 10/14/85 o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Planning Staff opponents, Cross Examination o Public Testimony; Proponents, o Recommendation By Planning Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council 6. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 13 5 SOUTHErN PACIFIC NPO f5 Located anorth Roadd. (W CTM between e12DD5 Tax Lot Avenue and 600 and WCTM north 2S1 12DApper Tax Boones Ferry Lots 100 6 101) o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges n Summation By Planning Staff Opponents, Cross Examination o Public Testimony: Proponents, o Recommendation By Planning Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council 7. PUBLIC NEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-85 AND ZONE CHANGE Located ZC atE10855ESWNGreenburg�Road (WCTM MSI 35BC, TaxCOMPANY L LotNPO a Public Nearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Planning Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearine Closed o Consideration By Council 8. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 13-85 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-85 US CREDITCORP Located at 10485 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM 1S1 34DA, Tax Lot 100) a Public Hearing Opened a Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Planning Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Considerittion By Council 9. PUBLIC HEARING PORTLAND FIXTURE/S & J APPEAL CPA 3-85 FULL EVIDENTIAL HEARING NPO A request by the City of Tigard City Council for a rehearing on an application filed by Portland Fixture to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation from CP (Commercial Professional) to CG (Commercial General) for a 7.9 acre site located on the south side of Scholls Ferry Road, west of Greenway Town Center (WCTM 1S1 34BC lot 400). o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Planning Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council 10. 911 REVENUE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION o Councilor Edwards 11. 68TH & PARKWAY STREET LID DISCUSSION o Project Engineer Keit'.. Thompson 12. RETIREMENT LEAVE POLICY - RESOLUTION NO. 85-� o Legal Council 13. 72ND AVENUE DISCUSSION o Community Development Director 14. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to Adopt Consent Agenda - Discussion? - Motion to Amend?: 14.1 Approve Council Minutes _ October 21, 1985 14.2 Receive and File: Departmental Monthly Reports For September 14.3 Receive and File: Community Development Land Use Decisions 14.4 Approve Bid Call For Computer System 14.5 Approve Board and Committee Appointments: Budget Committee - Resolution No. 85- 85 Neighborhood Watch Steering Committee—Resolution No. 85- 86 14.6 Approve Public Hearing Date For Hall Blvd./Burnham LID 5-01 - Resolution No. 85- 87 14.7 Approve November !-1. 1985 City Council Executive Meeting at City Hall 14.8 Appoint Mark Padgett as Liaison to County Road Jurisdiction 14.9 Approve Acceptance of Bouman St. Dedication & Street Improvement Non-Remonstrance Agreement 14.10 Approve Accepting Public Sanitary Sewer Extension-Mull Sewer Ext.- and Release the Guarantee Bond - Resolution No. 35- 88 14.11 Approve Accepting Copper Creek Phase III - Resolution No. 85- 89 14.12 Approve Accepting Copper Creek Phase IV - Resolution No. 85- 90 14.13 Approve Acceptance of Aszman Street Improvement Non-Remonstrance Agreement 14.14 Approve Acceptance of Rimkelt Street Dedication & Street Non-Remonstrance Agreement - Partial Bond Release & Partial Fee Refund 15. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 16. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) & (h) to discuss labor relations and pending litigation Issues. 17. ADJOURNMENT lw/3274A COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 28, 1985 - PAGE 2 • • �Jf 1 T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1985 - 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook, Councilors: Tom Brian, Jerry Edwards, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Bill Monahan, Acting City Administrator & Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. Acting Administrator requested item 14.6 be pulled from Consent for brief discussion and 'item #'9 be tabled at the applicant's request. b. Consensus of Council was to approve requests. 3. PUBLIC_ HEARING PORTLAND FIXTURE/S & J APPEAL CPA 3-85 FULL EVIDENTIAL HEARING NPO #7 A request by the City of Tigard City Council for a re-hearing on an application filed by Portland Fixture to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation from CP (Commercial Professional) to CG (Commercial General) for a 7.9 acre site located on the south side of Scholls Ferry Road, west of Greenway Town Center (WCTM 1S1 34BC lot 400). a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to continue the public hearing to November 25, 1985 at 7:00 PM. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 4. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Mr. Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, suggested Council may wish to view a film regarding sewer options prepared by EPA. b. Council directed staff to review the film and bring to Council if ,t seems appropriate. 5. PARK BOARD WORKSHOP o Park Board Members Present: Chairman Jim Blaurock, Pat Biggs, Betty Golden, Steve Slabaugh. Mr. John Mahler, recreation study coordinator. a. Council and Park Board Members discussed the Recreation Feasibility and Implementation Study. Additional information requested to be included in the report are: facility inventory, programming prioritization with costs, and more complete youth and senior activity information. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1985 MW b. Some members of the Park Board encouraged the Council to not include recreation funding as part of a tax base measure, but to consider it as a separate levy. C. After further discussion regarding budgeting and funding requirements, the Council expressed their appreciation for the draft of the recreation study and thanked the Park Board for their input. 6. ANNEXATION AREA PLANNING AGREEMENT a. Councilor Brian and Richard Boberg (NPO #7 Chairman) recommended Council adopt the resolution which is in the same form as that adopted by the City of Beaverton on 10/21/85. b. RESOLUTION NO. 85-82 A JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAVERTON AND THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AND SUPPORTING MUTUAL ANNEXATION PLANNING AREAS OF AGREEMENT (APAA). C. Councilor Brian withdrew his motion to approve the first draft of Resolution No. 85-82 with consensus of Council present from the 10/14/85 Council meeting. d. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to adopt Resolution 85-82 draft dated 10/28/85. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. - 7. PUBLIC HEARING. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9/85 THE NORTHWEST TIGARD ANNEXATION, NPO #7 A request by the City of Tigard to consider annexation of 88.08 acres into the City of Tigard under ORS 199.490(2)(x) Triple Majority Annexations. The land is located south of Old Scholls Ferry Road north of the current western City boundaries and east of SW Murray Blvd. (WCTM 1S1 33C, Lots 1200, 1100, 601, 602, 604, 600, 603, 500, 502, 503, 400, 300, 501, 700, 301, 800, 1301, 1302, 1300, and 1101). a. Public Hearing Reopened - Continued from 10/14/85 b. Acting Administrator stated that based upon the adoption of the APAA Resolution, Council may want to modify the staff recommendation to annex only those portions of land to the east of lower Scholls Ferry Road. He also noted that a letter had been received from Mr. & Mrs. Frank Martenson encouraging annexation of the entire area to the City of Tigard. C. Public Testimony: Proponents: Mr. Russ Kruger, 3515 SW Barbur Blvd. , recommended approval and questioned how the development of his property would be handled since part would be in Beaverton and part in Tigard. C ., Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1995 Councilor Brian noted that his understanding was that the city staff from Beaverton and Tigard would strike an agreement to have Tigard handle all construction phases and inspections for the total improvement to give more continuity for the development process and the Murray/Scholls Extension issue. Opponents: Gale Stover, Rt, 1 Box 381 Beaverton, declined to speak since the APAA resolution was adopted and addressed her concerns. Brad Hodges, Rt, 1 Box 364A Beaverton, withdrew his request to speak. d. Planning Staff recommended approval based on the APAA agreement. e. Public Hearing Closed f. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to direct staff to prepare resolution to approve annexation for those areas south and east of lower Scholls Ferry Road. Staff was also directed to get a letter from Beaverton showing agreement to Tigard handling construction phase inspections for the total Kruger development. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 8. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 13-85 SOUTHERN PACIFIC NPO #5 Located north and south between I-5 and 72nd Avenue and north of Upper Boones Ferry Road. (WCTM 2S1 12DD, Tax Lot 600 and WCTM 281 120A Tax Lots 100 & 101) a. Public Hearing Opened b. Keith Liden, Associate Planner, explained the request and the comprehensive plan an zone change issues. C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak d. Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommended approval e. Public Hearing Closed f. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Brian, requested staff to prepare ordinance to approve request as outlined in the staff report. 9. PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12--85 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 14-85 HEINICKE INSTRUMENTSMATIONAL APPLIANCE COMPANY NPO §2 Located at 10855 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM 1S1 35BC, Tax Lot 900) a. Public Hearing Opened Page 3 COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1985 b. Keith Liden, Associate Planner, discussed the request and distributed Planning Commission exhibit 5.4 from the 10/8/85 meeting (which is on file in the Planning Commission material) which showed pictures of the area. c, Public Testimony: Proponents: President of Ja-Sant Corp. 2300 SW 1st Avenue David Sant, applicant and _ Portland, stated he was the exclusive broker for the app recommended approval. d. Planning Staff & Planning Commission recommended approval. e, Public Hearing Closed f. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve request and direct staff to prepare ordinance with an emergency clause which was requested by the developer. Approved by unanimous vote of Coll"cil present. RECESS: 8:17 PM RECONVENE: 8:29 PM iO, PUBLIC HEARING -- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, GPA 13--85 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-85 US CREDITCORP a Street (WCTM 1S1 SADA, Tax Lot 100) Located at 10485 SW North Dakot a, Public Hearing Opened opsized request and noted that ed denial Keith Liden, Associate Planner, syn planning staff and Planning Commission have recommend b. based ata literal he locational rstrict criteria section retortion of the code, especially C. Public Testimony: Proponents: Joe Van 1_om, Architect 34 NW 1st Portland, addressed the locational criteria and noted only 1 is not met in the proposal. He noted that the site is only 1 or 2 tenths of a mile from Greenburg Road (an arterial) and though North Dakota is a minor collector it would offer sufficient ingress/egress movement for to vehicles from Bevt that so much is greenway/floodplaint. He also e land the and c undevelopable. of the parcel is g After a question from Council, Mr. Van Lam stated that the property area int a developmenteld maintain sponsibisite. Het recommendedy for the papprovalof tof greenway a the increased density request. Opponents: Richard Boberg, NPO #7 Chairman, referenced a letter from Mr. Van Lom to the Council dated 10/28/85 which Stated that NPO �� did not hear presentation of development proposal. Mr. Boberg NPO polled the Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1985 by phone since the NPO had voted no on this same development aboeverut 1 year ago. The NPO did not meet with the 10 applicant, Mr. Bober, confirmed the phone poll at their meeting continued by noting North Dakota is a minor collector, but is not currently developed to those standards and the additional traffic from the development would have an adverse impact on North Dakota. He noted concern that the 100' buffer requirement along the west side of the development was not preserved according the site plans submitted for review. It was also stated that the greenway on the site is currently under water with flooding during a portion of each year. Mr. Soberg, representing the NPO #7, recommended denial. Doug Condon, 10570 Ski North Dakota, was opposed to the development based on traffic impact and the fact that it seems to be designed for the low ins + +e family. North Dakota, opposed the development Betsy Cookson, 10520 SW noting density increase, traffic impact, arid flooding of the greenway area as her major concerns. Cross Examination Mr. Van Lom stated that a year ago the NPO #7 heard the proposal at the Planning Commission level. At that time he felt the Council did not take action to allow the NPO time to consider tthee proposal. The property owner is not financially ready to proceed with the project and had requested a meeting with the NPO to _ present the development plan. That NPO meeting was cancelled by t had Mr. Boberg and the applicant has noHe alsor stated tdiscuss that the the project with the NPO formally. floodplain information was taken from the US Corps of Engineers study of the area and showed that the project could be constructed as presented. Mr. Van Lom questioned whether the "buildable lands" inventory C included land within the flood plain. Acting Y ator stated he understood that the inventory only included that land that could be used for development. Mr. Van Lam challenged that by saying that his understanding was that all land in the zones, including floodplain areas, were used in the inventory. d. Planning Staff and Planning Commission recommended denial based on a strict interpretation of the locational criteria. Q. Public Hearing Closed f, Council expressed concern with density being upgraded again since it has alrersly occurred only on this property in 1983 and noted that the burden had not been met to cause a plan alteration now. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to g' tentatively deny the application and directed staff to prepare resolution for next meeting. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 5 COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 28, 1985 11. 911 REVENUE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION t and worked with the Tualatin r a, Councilor Edwards stated he had me He Rural Fire Protection District and noted could handlepthe joobld e coming soon. He felt TRFPD technically is overcharged for furtherbe a did note that though he does not feel the City 911 service, it is still an issuelafor thedistribution of theon a formula stated he would be working strict has now the tax dollars• Twhich+ wild better fre liall w more data to tbele collected reporting equipment detailing the City's use of the 911 center. b, Council expressed appreciation for the time spent by Councilor Edwards and the TRFPD staff. Consensus was to have Councilor Edwards continue to work on this project and ani Ont meet ng more to the Council. Ifo Police r Edwards sta an ted hhave him aware of this with the Chief for rd study also. 12• 68TH & PARKWAY STREET" LID DISCUSSION was the project a. Keith Thompson, Cooper Consulting, stated he engineer and noted several revisiontie t1feltthe occurred revisions could plan eng year.since Council saw it last ar. by 23% to 25%. He noted the increase the cost of the project tentative schedule for bid call h to advertise a 11/7/85, open pon bids on 12/5/85 and hopefully 12/16/85• rove the following documents Mr. Thompson requested Council c t can proceed noting that the which are needed before the p e Pollock papers would not obtained by staff- permanent t ff ecorded until the mortgage release information i permanent Slope Easement and Warranty Deed from Raymond Ftmeir and Frank Marren Jr. ent and Warranty Deed from Donald Pollock. Permanent Slope Easem n, seconded by Councilor Edwards to accept b. Motion by Councilor Bria and approve the mentioned documents. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. C. Mr. Thompson requested approval to call for bids on the project' d_ Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve call for bid. vote of Council present. Approved by unanimous 13, RETIREMENT LEAVE POLICY to develop some a. Legal Counsel reported that staff wleave as wishingbe - to interim guidelines for retirement would allow suffieientwith a sunsetu timed by 12/31/86. terminating This .permanent policy and still address the retirements develop that occur before then. 1985 page 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 28, b. Councilor Scott questioned what would happen if employee did not give 6 months notice which is required by the resolution. Legal Counsel stated that the policy would not have to be honored under those circumstances. C. Council and staff discussed the meaning of "unused unpaid overtime accrual" and determined that this was for "comp" time only and not executive staff "like time". d. Mayor Cook noted that Councilor Edin had recommended approval earlier in the week. e. RESOLUTION NO. 85-91 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A RETIREMENT' LEAVE POLICY FOR CERTAIN CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES. f. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve for discussion purposes. g, Councilor Edwards questioned why the City should change the sick leave policy from 96 hours cap for cash out to allowing half of the unused sick leave for retirement leave. h. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to table to the 11/18/85 meeting. Motion approved by a 3---1 majority •rote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. 14. 72NO AVENUE DISCUSSION a. Acting Administrator stated that staff has determined that the $7300 worth of site work + engineering costs to widen the turning area on SW Boones Ferry at 72nd Avenue could not be assessed to the property owners of the LID. The cost would come from the Streets SDC Fund if work was requested. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to authorize staff to proceed to close the 72nd Avenue LID with no further modifications at this time. C. Councilor Scott requested that Lhe City complete the work needed at the Boones Ferry/72nd Avenue intersection to allow for better turning of the large trucks servicing the area. d. Councilor Brian stated that this intersection is not currently as high a priority for the SOC dollars as other areas. Motion to approve closing 72nd Avenue with no further modifications was approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. Page 7 -COUNCIL MINUTES – OCTOBER 28, 1985 15. CONSENT AGENDA: A 15.1 Approve Council Minutes - October 21, 1985 i, 15.2 Receive and File: Departmental Monthly Reports For September 15.3 Receive and File: Community Development Land Use Decisions 15.4 Approve Bid Call For Computer System 15.5 Approve Board and Committee Appointments: Budget Committee -- Resolution No. 85- 85 Neighborhood Watch Steering Committee - Resolution No. 85- 86 15.6 Approve Public Hearing Date For Hall Blvd./Burnham LID #85-01 - Resolution No. 85- 87 15.7 Approve November 11, 1985 City Council Executive Meeting at City Hall 15.8 Appoint Mark Padgett as Liaison to County Road Jurisdiction 15.9 Approve Acceptance of Bouman St. Dedication & Street Improvement Non-Remonstrance Agreement 15.10 Approve Accepting Public Sanitary Sewer Extension-Mull Sewer Ext.- and Release the Guarantee Bond - Resolution No. 85- 88 15.11 Approve Accepting Copper Creek Phase III - Resolution No. 85- 89 15.12 Approve Accepting Copper Creek Phase IV - Resolution No. 85- 90 15.13 Approve Acceptance of Aszman Street Improvement Non-Remonstrance Agreement 15. 14 Approve Acceptance of Rimkeit Street Dedication & Street Non-Remonstrance Agreement -- Partial Bond Release & Partial Fee Refund a. ITEM .6 Stu Cato, Project Engineer, distributed the Engineer's Preliminary Report and noted the changes in cost and reduced ` right-of-way based on Council direction. After discussion regarding the sidewalk requirements, Councilor Brian moved to approve Resolution No. 85-87 and call for a public hearing on 11/25/85. Motion seconded by Councilor Edwards. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. b. ITEM .8 Council consensus was to approve appointment of Mark Padgett as the Transportation Committee's official liaison to the City Staff and Elected Officials on the issue of County Road Jurisdiction. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve consent agenda with item .8 amended as noted by Council discussion except for item .6 which was pulled from Consent for action. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 16. NON--AGENDA ITEMS: No items were discussed. Page 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 28, 1985 17. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 10:19 PM under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) & (h) to discuss labor relations and pending litigation issues. 18. ADJOURNMENT: 10:27 PM. Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST: yor — City of Tigard LW/3363A f. Page 9 — COUNCIL MINUTES — OCTOBER 28,1985 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)884-0380 ice 7-6532 BEAVERTON,OREGON 87075 CFf��O ( Legal Notice Advertising (�' j ", 85 • •City of Tigard ® Tearsheet Notice Q&OF �Rn • PO Box 23397 • 0 Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. 1, 'Phs T,e-ex Rnf.rhPx__ being first duly sworn, depose andsay that 1 am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk,of the Tigard T i�g es a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 183.010 and 193.020;published at mica tar A in the aforesaid county and state;that the rity ounciljeetina a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and consecutive in the following issues: O,gtober 24 , 1985 Subsctlbeo s orn to before me this Oct. 2 5 , 1985 Notary Public for Oregon My COMM"00 1EXI s 9/20/88 VF AFFHlAW K Jw f E 'al x.� �� Nim� W. �VP .la. }.•r� jj #J!5 ._,fir *,�r iiY.•kf V��• �IIIMM� � � ��t Him 1 04 MhN �4 M +�kf `��' � LLii r• �` sail ""` AAV LXI ui E�l S z v CL o ® 10c' ca w o ® h r c y I co � o D 0 r" w Q g m Uv v ® • s a Q a a Z c Z O CD w 14 14 a ~ c lu -HsdM U x ILd � 0 c c c a) c m c c0 CM cc QCKae 03s c }, Jo 'a"3 o, so.. O� o � ®� a d v triCL o. LL Z oc ®mac i n o x LL H cna 4r W emu IL ° o fCL > >. O SJJR .9O �• �F / byo� WWZ � r Of `` , 04 T3 a. c 6 aG E-1 i OWN 4 NOTE: CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 18, 1985 WILL BE HELD IN THE COMMONS AREA OF FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH. r AGENDA ITEM # — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE /L> (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME b ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED DATE I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Pleaseprint Int the information) Item Description: *z 7 Y19,,bb (JecAr-i�p �Jein,Gke J m e»-f5 . Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) �k*tk**��tik###*�kie�sk*��&***styt�C**it�k�k,kisalrotieit�ritictk�#*�***its*ic***�*irrkit9k+t*irk**#*akik�Ant***#** Name, Address and .Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation DATE I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the ��information) Item Description: ` SPA e3-8-S•4 z G IS -SS Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation T t� t � 1 3 DATE O g I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) t s Item Description: 5 JWO �i G ce-6t;' C� Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation s `fir [A d 26 R -� r DATE zo I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: IC i a c /3 ��' Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation RECREATION FEASIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION STUDY Prepared by: H.J. Mahler LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Mr. Jim Blaurock, Chairman Tigard Parks Board Tigard, Oregon Chairman Blaurock: Please find attached the Recreation Study contracted for. I believe as you have suggested that a City of Tigard Recreation Program would be of tremendous benefit to your community. I also believe it would be positively received when properly presented for public approval . I am at your service for personal presentation and explanation. Respect.j�lly submitted, T-- c` RECREATTON STUDY INDEX Page Task Description 1 Forward 2 Existing Services 3 Interest Surveys 6 Parks 8 Proposed Recreation Function . 12 Method of Implementation 16 Report of Conclusion 17 Appendix 300 Study 18 Block Survey 19 Telephone Survey 20 Basic Coordinator Budget 21 Coordination Task list 22 Funding Sources 23 y ' Yr Al Maw 11 ligg iiiiiiial TASK DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report, as understood by the author, was to test the interest of the Tigard citizens in their potential interest of a leisure services delivery system. The second part of the report is to investigate the potential of implementation of a system. Because of the acceleration of the report presentation from November 31 to October 24, 1985 some of the proposed community interest surveys were by passed. I would suggest that the statistical results are accurate and reflective of the community's interest. I trust you will find this report satisfactory. FORWARD The author of thii, report has taken the positive point of view that the delivery of leisure services is a very,advaritageous prgjection from the municipal or county, special district) framework as for many 4in conjunction with a parks operation). *,. it may provide the only p':sitive citizen contact by the local government. In conducting interviews and surveys, we must keep in mind that the respondent will tend to reflect on past experiences, eliminating a true evaluation of possible new activities. Also, one must keep in mind that the word "recreation" is one that covers a multitude of experiences and ideas. I would like: to suggest to you as a reader, that few respondents have a clear understanding of what a positive and worthwhile impact a . ,, leisure services entity can have on the community and its citizens, regardless of their personal participation. perated, a recreation (and parks) Properly and efficiently o f the communities interest and a menu entity can be a reflection o from which its citizens can taste new and exciting experiences from the "good life". i EXISTING SERVICES Tigard is a very unique community that has demonstrated time and time again that they can rise to the occasion in the time of crisis of a demonstrated need. A number of facilities and facility improvements provide mute testimony to this fact. The problem is 'that this kind of volunteer involvement has a history of slowing down when responsiblity for a long term or on-going task evolves. It can be said that "everyone is willing to buy the horse, but feeding him every day is not so attractive". Every area of the state can provide grim reminders of exuberant labor left uncared for in the absence of a base agency or entity. Would the efforts of Tigard pride shine if it were not for the call by the school district? A number of agency activity offerings exist in terms of club function (scouts, campfire girls, etc) and the observation is that you are blessed with these being successful . The shortcoming is that the .activities are strictly the results of establishing group activity with minimal access to non-members. Establishing activity agencies such as Boys Club and YMCA/YWCA have a successful history of serving similar communities with quality service. Neither agency has indicated imminent plans for physically establishing an opertion within the confines of Tigard. The "Y", (Y.M.C.A.) is operating an outreach series of programs in the area, most noteably Y-Basketball, but it has not attracted great numbers, perhaps because of the cost and lack of face-to-face relationships. Without an in-town facility the agency success faces what seems formidable odds. -3- A number of government funded agencies and churches have available many attractive offerings, but unfortunately, they are not always subscribed to; possible due to the lack of proper or effective marketing. There may also be a reluctance to enjoin a group from a church (which one does not attend) or some concern about attending a Youth Service Center activity which agency has a reputation for dealing only with persons who have had personal or criminal behavior references (by the way, this isn't always the case). As in any community, Tigard is blessed with the usual sports organizations whose efforts provide seasonal competitive exposure. As they consist of human beings, they are subject to the same human-failings as any other group face with competition, achievement of success( or lack of it), parent-parent and parent-child relationships, and ego (coach, parent, child). f Also, as with any similar organization, the work and accomplishment is usually the effort of a small minority and the history of any such group usually contains the "activity death" of many a good worker who was overworked in achieving a years or seasons successful operation. It is often the case that such volunteers find that the task they wanted to do is often neglected because of additional required tasks. Members of the Tigard community also have access to a number of commercial recreation outlets. The traditional blowing alley and similar offerings still attract large numbers and the cost appears .to be reasonable (quite possibly because of competition for the recreational dollar) , however, the advent of fitness, being slim, etc, has created a whole new wave of entrepreneur. Fitness, aerobic, aquarobic types of classes are readily offered by persons not always wholly qualified. Health clubs are now offering services, tests, and shiny equipment that professionals in the field vii�w with concern about their need, relevance or quality. ` z . ,4- rte. Generally speaking, Tigard is enjoying a number of rather well-run and attractive programs but there are some questions that I will address later in the report. v -5- ri INTEREST SURVEYS Three surveys were conducted to get a feeling of interest in a community recreation entity. The first survey was the personal quick response to four (4) questions by 300 citizens. This was done in groups of 100 on three different days in the Tigard area. The second survey was a block survey consisting of the personal interview for an in-depth feeling by talking at home with residents of 3 city blocks. A strict numerical tabulation was not used but a list of feelings was recorded. The third survey was a random calling of 40 residences using t the same four (4) questions. The results of the survey and the conversations along with the survey, indicate to the author the following: 1. The community is generally in favor of'arecreation component. 2. They are extremely concerned about the tax increase regardless of benefits received. 3. They are unhappy with the present Parks operation in terms of the present condition of the park properties. 4. I sense. a distrust of government in general ; City of Tigard government in particular. My personal opinion is that much of this distrust is based on misunderstanding and misinterpre- tation. During this brief period of time, I. suggest that the community sees debate and chaos, action and leadership as dictatorship and self-grandizement. The community seems to have A warm feeling for the liWe staff, but are very personal in their criticism of management and elected officials. -6- 5. I feel that a vigorous and enthusiastic campaign would result in increased park funds and support for a basic recreation entity. I would also suggest that there is not enough enthusiasm to carry additional items in a combined presentation. It is with a sense of singular success that I now present a program for implementation. -7- i PARKS The parks maintenance sytem presently is totally unfunded, therefore, undermanned and unproductive. The injestion of additional funds is not the answer and could actually compound the situation without taking some very significant steps first. The first things that must happen is a development of a City Master Plan for parks. The plan should begin with major projections and needs without any regard for existing properties. The decisions that need to be made are: 1. What is the ration- of required open space and active areas per person and per developed area. 2. How will these be met in determining the user index for need and establishment (neighborhood, community, city-wide, regional ). This includes establishing user parameter (neighborhood park serves 1 square mile, etc). This too involves the criterion for indicating what facilities are provided and where. For example a neighborhood park might provide play lots, open grass areas, a simple backstop. A ball diamond or tennis court would tend to be in areas accessible and available to the whole city. 3. The park design itself should be as part of its original presentation include the development in a guise that can be maintained, and an estimate of manhouirs and equipment needs. This presentation with council approval eliminates embarrassments such as a Summer Lake where a facility is allowed to evolve by reaction to thought of the day without any pre-planning as to upkeep capability and cost. That park is a good example where steep banks present a formidable l` maintenance obstacle regardless of funds available. It is noted that some physical improvements are noted without any research of x -8- A MEN need or whom the user will be (local community or City-wide). 4. Maintenance systems should be designed and costed with an obligation by Council to support the systems. Without council 's approval , you end up with reactionary maintenance and community distress which creates misunderstanding on the part of the community. 5. Inventory of major users like Little League Baseball , Youth Soccer to determine their needs. 6. Inventory of all public areas, including schools to determine how these needs can be met. In the resolution of facility problems, ownership cannot be allowed to be a factor. Every effort must be made to overcome jealous public agency egos. 7. Once the baster Plan is completed with activity areas designated, the development plan is projected. Priorities are established, (f projected costs for new development are determined. This plan with capital costs and annual maintenance costs now are ready for Council 's consideration. Council, with the assistance of staff and citizeny then are obligated to decide on behalf of the community when and if,the timetable of cbmpletion,and funding source. 8. When the plan is adopted, it is not written in stone, but a take-off point is established if new or wiser thought is presented. A plan like this is .the basis for every park request and development thought. 9. Any time a potential park property is brought forward, it must be considered as to how it conforms to the established criteria. If it doesn't, then refuse it or change the plan. t, -9- 10. There are a couple of items that need addressing: a. Tennis courts: There are a couple of existing park plans that show individual tennis courts. I suggest that a single area be established for a set of tennis courts. By centralizing them, you reduce maintenance costs, increase usability and eliminate a give neighborhood "ownership". You also provide the possibility of providing support items such as lights, wind screen, restrooms, etc. b. Sports fields: I suggest that immediate thought should be given to properly accommodate the local ba eball , soccer and softball programs. The present si tu.1tion v�'th an outstanding diamond (Cook Park) adjoining a well use- picnic area has been a source of irritation and will continue to grind: Also, on many occasions contests are played on small school properties whose capabilities to host a team is limited, so 'local lawns are being used by the public in a runner that surely upsets the owner including a seasonal tirade of bikes and cars. The solution is to commence development of a city wide facility that would house the scheduled games, provide parking, restrooms, etc. Ideally this should be located apart from any residential area so that the noise and excitement is enjoyed only by the program participant. il. Because of a general community feeling of fiscal conservatism, every creative concept must be explored. The use of greenthumb persons, issuing of maintenance contracts and the exploration into easily maintained parks design and materials must be pursued. 12. The hardest thing to do is to takeaway an established service. If limited in 'the future, don't offer it now. you foresee a service being w Another rule of thumb for issuing of parks, services . is, if it benefits the total community (mowing grass) then it is probably a justifiable service. If it benefits only a given group (marking a field), then they should probably do it themselves. Z. �f ,I1- THE PROPOSED FUNCTION In discussing the issue in the community, it is obvious a highly sophisticated leisure services delivery system is not needed. First of all , there are a number of excellent volunteer run programs 4. operating at this time. It should not be theintent of any recreation operation to supplant these volunteer efforts. Secondly, the operation of a total paid st4iff is very costly and unless subsidized would create an elite of those who could afford many of the activities. I therefore, suggest a Department of Parks and Recreation under the present city structure of Community Development. The Parks function would operate under the incumbent and would be expanded as funds are made available. The Recreation function would consist of a 3/4 time (initially) Recreation Coordinator (please See Proposed Task List), and a 1/2 time clerk-typist. For convenience sake, it may be found that funding 50% of an existing similar skilled s aff person would be most satisfactory. The Department would be guided by a Parks and Recreation Committee (of Council ) It would be the function' of the Committee to set policy, establish bpdgets. Advise staff, all subject to Council approval . The function of the Recreation Coordinator would be to assist existing programs, coordinate existing and new programs regardless of generating agency, explore new potential programs. On several occasions, I have heard an inquiry as to the possibility of joining up with the City of Tualitin or the Tualitin Hills Parks and Recreation District. I see no value of being included in those activities at their tax base. I see a real potential loss in Tigard identity. -12- Another concept is the creation of a new special district. I strongly recommend against this, solely on the basis of my concern for the creation of antoher tax based management system when a very suitable system (The City of Tigard) already exists. If concern or unhappiness exists, then the answer is to get out and change it... . But I see no value in selling the car just because the tire is flat. For the purpose of thought expansion, and discussion, I am going to describe what services should be available through the afore-described Recreation function. SPORTS As the present youth organizations seem quite tapable of handling their own affairs, the assistance would be in items like scheduling, etc. Also, the Department could be very useful in .developing pre-season sports clinics and emergency first aid classes. The. Department should also consider developing alternative sports activities for those: uninterested in what is already available. Adult sports are also already available. The present Mens Basketball program is probably the most sophisticated league in the metropolitan area. However, it probably does not meet the needs of those seeking a less demanding regimen of competition. The potential to expand or introduce adult soccer, softball , volleyball , flag football , etc. for all skill levels for mens, womens, co-ed teams is limitless. To assume that if people wanted to play, they would organize it, is to assume that because we are often hungry, we are all good cooks. A sports council should be formed consisting of a representative from each athletic group, a member of the Tigard school staff and a member of Council. The potential of this group working together on philosophical and facility problems would be of tremendous benefit to all of Tigard. f � -13- Q CULTURAL ACTIVITIES An Arts Council should be forms to coordinate the resources within the community interested in cultural activity and growth. The group would assist the department in determining staff persons and program areas that would support a successful cultural arts program. Such a group might be of considerable assistance to the school staff as they strive to provide such experiences within the classroom. AQUATICS The City of Tigard is very fortunate in having the high school available. A myth presently exists that the pool is not available to Tigard residents who live outside the Tigard School District boundaries. That is not the case in any way, shape or form. In talking with the School District Administrators, I find them very open with regard to the exploring of new aquatic programs. It must be assumed that very large portions of tme are consumed by swim teams and school , but a very successful community usage is available. The Department should be working with the Aquatics staff in reviewing potential programs and special functions that would benefit all. YOUTH The Department should consider after-school programs and weekend activities for those who might otherwise not have an activity or domicile during those hours. The Department should also work closely with all youth serving clubs and agencies and try to coordinate thus prevent overlap. A youth council should be formed of the .various groups (Campfire, Scouts, Y.W.C.A., Youth Service Center etc), that would attempt to act as a guiding light to youth needs in terms of `social types of activities. _14- �' 9 ply ADULT er to The Department would function as an enabler and encourager 9 our adult population in how they might better spend their leisure hours. In addition to the existing activities, the Department would introduce new activities, coordinate special events, offer instruction classes. There is absolutely no limit to the range of self-sustaining adult activities. ELDER CITIZENS There is, of course, a .very sophisticated array of senior activities available within the Tigard community. The Department may be able to be of assistance to already successful offerings. fi a METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION It would appear that the availability of funds for the expansion lable within the Present City o of Parks maintenance and the inclusian of a Ret►reati# program are not reasonably avai ` 'Tigard and taxing scheme. It is also highly doubtful whether the in adding such re elected representatives of the city are comfortable sion. without an opportunity for their exp functions to the community Therefore, a vote for approval should be scheduled for Spring 1985 with the actual operation to commence in June 1966. It is obvious to me that such a vote would be positive with a campaign of hard work and effective planning. i Mo x _ v„ REPORT CONCLUSION To summarize, in very brief and specific terms, the conclusions of this report I list 1. A majority of the community are interested in a Recreation Program. 2. They are divided on how to support such a function. 3. The majority of the community is interested in upgrading the parks maintenance program, but are not supportive of tax increase. 4. A recreation program would be a tremendous--asset to the community and would function best under the City of Tigard entity. 5. A referral to public vote should be scheduled in Spring 1986 with implementation in June 1986. 6. The Parks Board should commence immediately in providing a Parks Master Plan. x rs� Tz t _17- -77 1,.1 "300" SURVEY Question Number One Do you feel there is a need for a recreation department in the City of Tigard? Yes 140 No 127 No Opinion 33 Question Number Two Are you satisfied with the present level of parks and property maintenance? Yes 109 No 128 No Opinion 63 Question Number Three If recreation activity programs were available in Tigard, how should r= they be funded? a. Tax Base 72 b. Participant or User Fee 161 C. Commercial sponsorship 41 d. Combination of the above 11 19 s e. No Opinion Question Number Four ' Would you be willing to support a tax increase for an increased level of parks maintenance. Yes 123 No 144 No Opinion. 36 -18- 7.`1'�tlt. i �r tr---•.man+r^.w'.'am•.a..zwwMf,YvefelS. .—'" BLOCK SURVEY t Discussion Areas 1. Recreation Programming most are interested but they are concerned about need. 2. Parks Most want improvement but do not wish an increase in taxes. They feel there is alternatives including priority changing in present City Nall expenditures. 3. Funding Most feel users should pay their own way. The concern was expressed that such a City function might become very costly to the tax payer. 4. Other Definite alienation toward present City government. TELEPHONE SURVEY Question Number One Do you feel there is a need for a recreation department in the City of Tigard? Yes 22 No 17 No Opinion 1 Question Number Two Are you satisfied with the present level of parks and property maintenance? Yes 9 No 31 No Opinion 0 Question Number Three If recreation activity programs were available in Tigard, how should they be funded? a. Tax Base 5 b. Participant or user fee 20 c. Commercial sponsorship 12 d. Combination of the above 3 e. No opinion 0 Question Number Four Would you be willing to support a tax increase for an increased level of parks maintenance? Yes 17 No 23 No Opinion 0.. '•• a _ - z .,20 - PROPOSED RECREATIONAL BUDGET (Basic 12 Month) Expenditure Staff $28920 Recreation coordinator 1800 x 12 x 75% $16200 Fringe benefits (20%) 3240 Clerk typist 900 x 12 x 50% 5400 Fringe benefits 1080 Part time supervisors 3000 Equipment 1000 Auto 1200 $31120 Income 4225 Based on 110% of supervisors and 750 equipment Deficit $26895 -21- AVAILABLE FUNDI'1G SOURCES This session was not complete at report filing date, but will be forwarded as an addendum. F F 1 C ; IMM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Discussion ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: APAA Resolution on 10/14/85 PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: Councilor Tom Brian DEPARTMENT HEAD OK; � ` CITY ADMINISTRATOR: _ POLICY ISSUE Should the Council adopt the proposed Annexation Area Planning Agreement accepting the boundaries agreed to by the City with the City of Beaverton. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Council delayed action on the APAA pending a neighborhood meeting the affected citizens, NPO's, and Planning Commissioners. The meeting will be held on October 24 with Councilor Brian in the lead. A report will be given to you verbally concerning the outcome of the meeting. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the resolution creating the Annexation Planning Area Agreement. 2. Take no action. SUGGESTED ACTION (WAM:br/2035P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council October 24, 1485 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director,' Community Development SUBJECT: Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA) The APAA was continued from the October 14, 1985 Council session to allow an opportunity for citizen input. The Council asked that a neighborhood meeting be held on Thursday, October 2.4 for NPO, citizens, and Planning Commission input. Due to the schedule of packet preparation, the comments from the meeting cannot be provided at this time. Councillor Brian and I will report the results of the meeting to give the Council an opportunity to consider all input prior to acting on the proposal. (WAM:br/2031P) WANW BEAVERTON Larry D.Cole Mayor October 23, 1985 Mr. Robert Jean City Administrator City of Tigard 12755 S. W. Ash Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bob: Enclosed for your reference and distribution to the Mayor and Council of the City of Tigard is a copy of Resolution 2647 adopted unanimously by the City of Beaverton Mayor and Council on October 21, 1985. Please note some minor changes in the narrative description outlined in Section 2 and on the A.P.A.A. Resolution, Attachment A. Thank you for your efforts in coordinating this ,joint policy. Sincerely, Lawrence Bauer Assistant to the Mayor LB:ag Enc. a r_ City of B�avertan•4950 S.W.Hall Boulevard•Beaverton,Oregon 97005- 158 o(53)644-2191 � 1 RESOLUTION NO. A JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF BEAVERTON AND THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AND SUPPORTING MUTUAL ANNEXATION PLANNING AREAS OF AGREEMENT (APAA) WHEREAS, The cities of Beaverton and Tigard find. that municipal urban services can be provided most efficiently and equitably by cities; and WHEREAS, Conflicting land use plans and overlapping areas of plantendning interest towards illogicaldto delay the and inefficient servmceeannexatoboundar elto cities and s n and WHEREAS, Both cities respect the rights and preferences of pro- perty owners and residents to decide when to annex to a city according to State Law; and WHEREAS, Both cities see competition and conflict between cities over individual annexation proposals as contrary to their mutual long-range community interest and wish to avoid such conflicts whenever f possible by mutually adopting a clear statement of interest. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Beaverton, Oregon: Section 1. A Joint Annexation Planning Area Agreement (APAA) hereby exists between the two cities; t Section 2. The South Beaverton-North Tigard boundary on future annexation areas of interest as shown on the Map (Attachment A) shall : begin East at the Multnomah-Washington County line; Westerly follow Tay- lors Ferry Road and a line across to Oleson Road; Southerly from- this point to Hall Boulevard; Westerly along Hall Boulevard to the Hall-Scholls Ferry Road intersection; from the Hall-Scholls Ferry intersection a mutual study area exists for the Washington Square area bounded by Scholls Ferry, Highway 217, Greenburg Road to Hall Blvd. and back to the Hall-Scholls Ferry Intersection; from there Southwest along Scholls Ferry Road to the Old Scholls Ferry-New Scholls Ferry Road intersection; continuing Southwest along New Scholls Ferry Road to the Urban Growth Boundary. Section 3. The cities declare and support Beaverton's annexa- tion interests North and West of this APAA Boundary and Tigard's annexa- tion interests South and East of the APAA Boundary; Reso. No. /7 Ago 9 �� m Resolution No. o?CO y`J Page 2 Section 4. The cities mutually agree that upon request from the other that they will support annexation proposals to the other consistent i with the APAA Boundary. The cities mutually agree that they will not approve annexations to their city contrary to the APAA without a resolu- tion from the other city supporting such an annexation and specifically modifying any departure from the APAA Boundary; Section 5. The cities further resolve to generally support an- nexations by the other even away from the APAA Boundary areas and to fur- ther develop a joint annexation policy statement in this regard; Section 6. The cities further agree to a joint staff review and mutual Council approval of the Murray Road connection through the Old-New Scholls Ferry Road area from Beaverton southeast into Tigard. The cities agree to revise and amend other planning agreements consistent with the APAA resolution. Adopted by the Council this 21st day of October, 1985. Ayes Ys Attest: Approved: LI IVory WILCCYI# City RecorderZ LAR COLU, MayorRecorder i Reso. No. �•O O tr® • �� _ _ �' ` .��♦• - is �`��•�' - .. ��' �� - - �.•� •!I'll'.v; �'-�•,•• cj„�,-� � �� r "� �' ��` fit' ;�x,� �y •� �.��'�'`'. L. �+off ��•. _'� _ ��: •-.. ` � _:= i „e...�.--, -aa s+s c Ste' '� �— — `•�' � '' �! - - - _ ` .t M..�ss•- ,1 f ly ZX zz 1 � J 1. " 1' r 1 ut c -F c < < �. t ` 1 an ui Q co j W ! Q r � m h Frank H. Martenson Dolores I. Martenson Rt . 1, Box 369 Beaverton, Or. 9?Cl? October 18, 1995 Tax Lot #400 Mayor Bohn Cook ter{ +€�6rr� All Membe-s of Tigard City Council Tigard City Mall Tigard, Oregon fi` '�sU .._ Gentlemen: Subject: File #CPA-9-95 (Northwest Tis-ard Annex-tion) We disagree with the annexation decision rade at the October ' 14th City Counail mp-ttng. 60% of the nrorser ty owners (62.91 acres of a total 99.00 acres) in the diGnuted area have retitioned for annexation to Ttc�ard, no- Beaverton. This Indicates owners of only 21.27 acres have n^t signed the annexation petition. Of that 21.27 a.crP•, one is neutral, and another owner with an 11 acre parcel ha.^ not been reached to date, thev live out of the area. The required annexation nrocedure was followed, so at the October 14th Council meeting, we expected ar^rova.l of the annexRtton. Instead, Mayor Coon: and another Council member told us that the isslxe had been discussed and they had decided the area would be In Beaverton. We have lived here for 20 YeRrs, and do not believe there Is justice in Council members makinx arbitrary decisions, and changinR the rules at the last mtnute. Old Soho'-is Ferry Road will be wtdened in the near futi.xre, making it the major thoroughfare and a natural boundary between Beaverton and :'iga-d, We hone you will review this decision and annex the nronerty to the City of Tigard, Sincerely, `rank H. Martenson Dolores I. M rtenson Wage 1 of two pages _ u roe,- Letter to: Mayor John Cook All Members if �tMard C ttv Council OctobAr 1 , IOP5 ccs Bill Monahan Director of Comm. Develonment Bob Jean City Manager Mayor LArry Cole City of Beqverton ;Ryan O'Brien Planning Consultant „ t I 1 F � _ A R —sem CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public Hearing Was Held ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:Northwest Tigard Before City Council on 10/14/85 Annexation PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton REQUESTED BY: City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: (/ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Should the Council annex approximately 88 acres bounded by Scholls Ferry Road and Old Scholls Ferry Road, known as the Northwest Tigard Annexation. INFORMATION SUMMARY PLEASE BRING THE INFORMATION ON THIS ISSUE THAT' WAS IN YOUR OCTOBER 14, 1985 COUNCIL PACKET. A public hearing was held on this issue on October 14, 1985. The Council voted to continue consideration of the request pending action on the APAA to be considered prior to this item on October 28, 1985. A copy of the October 14, 1985 minutes is attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. If the APAA is not adopted, direct staff to prepare a resolution to forward to the triple majority annexation proposal to the Boundary Commission. 2. If the APAA is adopted, direct staff to prepare a resolution to forward to the Boundary Commission an annexation proposal which includes only those property owners who own property located on the east side of Lower Scholls Ferry Road. 3. Take no action. 4. Deny the annexation request. SUGGESTED ACTION Based on the action on the APAA considered prior to this issue, hold a hearing. Make a decision and direct staff to prepare a resolution if necessary. �- (EAN:br/2037P) IX T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 14, 1985 - 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors; Tom Brian, Phil Edin, Jerry Edwards, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Joy Martin. Administrative Assistant; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Patt Martin, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator stated the following: o Continue the Executive Session at the end of tonights meeting under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d) & (h) to discuss labor relations and pending litigation issues. o Item #10 - Annexation Planning Area Agreement Resolution Draft handed out at meeting tonight. o Item #11 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 9-85 The Northwest Tigard Annexation may be affected by the decision on Item #10 and recommend to continue to 10/28/85 City Council Meeting. o Item #12 & 013 - 68th Avenue/Parkway LID #35-Phase IV, Call for Bids and Greenburn/Tiedeman LID #85-02-Phase I continue to 10/28/85 City Council Meeting. o Item #16 - County Road Acceptance Resolution handed out at meeting tonight. o Item #17 - Council League of Oregon Cities Conference Approval - Request approval to attend and number of Council attending. o Item #18.5 - Policy & Administration Rules Resolution No. 85-79 revised and handed out tonight. o Item #18.8 - Revised Council Calendar - Note: November 20, 1985 meeting not listed on memo but agreed to by Council. o Item 018.11 - November Newsletter Draft - Revised page passed out at meeting tonight. 0 Item #19 - Check to see if quorum for next City Council meeting. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, please.) ai. Jim Hartman and Al Bates of the Tetropolitan Kiwanis presented v: Council members (John Cook, Tom Brian, Jerry Edwards, Phil Edin's wife) and staff members (Bob Jean, Donna Corbet, and Diane Jelderks) who helped at their Pancake Breakfast on September 22, 1985 with Certificates of Appreciation. The profits of $3500 will be donated to the Senior Center. Paged - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 14, 1985 g. Councilor Scott moved, seconded by Councilor Edin to table this item to no date certain. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Motion to approve Resolution No. 85-82 failed for lack of vote. h. Councilor Brian stated he would like to see a meeting to be scheduled with the highest priority with the NPO' s and be brought back to Council after they had input. The Planning Commission should be invited to attend this meeting also to update, review and comment back to Council. o City Administrator stated 10/24/85 was open at 7:30 p.m. The members of the NPO's, Planning Commission, and Council will be notified of the place of the meeting and date. The comments will be scheduled for 10/28/85 Council meeting. 11. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-85 THE NORTHWEST TIGARD ANNEXATION NPA # 7 A request by the City of Tigard to consider annexation of 88.08 acres into the City of Tigard under ORS 199.490 (2)(a) Triple Majority Annexations. The land is located south of Old Scholls Ferry Rd north of the current western City boundaries and east of SW Murray Blvd. (WCTM 1S1 33C, lots 1200, 1100, 601, 602, 604, 600, 603, 500, 502, 503, 400, 300, 501, 700, 301, 800, 1301, 1302, 1300, and 1101). a. Public Hearing Opened b. Councilor Scott moved, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue this item to the October 28, 1985 City Council meeting. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 12. LID POLICY CODE_AMENDMENTS - ORDINANCE NO, 85-40 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 84-60; RATIFYING ORDINANCE NO. 85-12 ASSUMPTION CRITERIA FOR BANCROFT ASSESSMENTS; AND ADOPTING REVISED GENERAL PROCEDURES RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS. a. Administrative Assistant Martin stated a revised copy of the Ordinance was passed out to the Council tonight and gave a summary of the revised sections. b. Councilor Brian commended Administrative Assistant Martin for the time and effort she afforded to this ordinance. C. Councilor Brian moved, seconded by Councilor Edin to adopt Ordinance No. 85-40. Approved b unanimous vote of Council present. Pp y Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 14, 1985 I® ff CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 2b, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 17, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Recommendation of _ ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: approval by Planning Comm 10/8/85 CPA 11/85 / ZC 13-85 PREPARED BY: Keith Liden REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: 4 _ __ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On October 8, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Light Industrial and Zone Change from R-12 or I-L to I-P and recommended approval of the request. The applicant's statement, staff report, and minutes are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt an ordinance approving CPA 11-85/ZC 13-85. 2. Deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION 1 -> Alternative 1. t (KSL:pm/2010P) TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 8, 1985 v 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut - LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Owens, Peterson, Bergmann, and Leverett. Absent: Commissioner Fyre, Vanderwood, and Campbell. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Commission Owens moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to approve the Minutes from September 10, 1985, as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Leverett abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION o Commissioner Butler reviewed information from the seminar that he had attended, presented by the Oregon Planning Institute in Eugene on October 4th. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENT NPO N 3 DONALD OLSON Senior Planner Liden explained that this item had been set over from the previous hearing because no contact had been made with Mr. Olson. Since then staff had contacted Mr. Olson, who stated he would attend the meeting.' Mr. Olson was not present. Commission Peterson moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set this item over to the end of the meeting to give Mr. Olson 'an opportunity to show. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's. present. .5,2 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIOk SCE 3-85 TIGARD ARCO/DENNIS THOMPSON NPO M 1 Request to allow an increase in the height of an existing freestanding sign to approximately 30' where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately :110 square feet per side where 72 square feet is permitted. Located: 12475 SW Main St. (WCTM 2S1 2AB lot 2800). Set over from September 10. 1985. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the history of the changes the sign had gone through since its original construction. Staff was still recaaimanding denial. Two pictures showing the sign from Pacific Highway were distributed. Discussion followed regarding the size of the different parts of the sign. ` � PE NNIIHi3. GOPi"IIS9�QNx'KVAM— Oetobar .8, 1985 Page I APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Dennis Thompson, 12475 SW Main Street, concurred with the staff report regarding changes to the sign. He felt the Code was being selectively enforced and interpreted since the majority of the signs on Main Street are non-conforming. Discussion followed regarding the criteria, size of the sign, and possible compromises. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding what was allowed for the Texaco Sign Code Exception. Consensus of the Commission was that the sign should be lowered. President Moen preferred having the request forwarded to City Council. _ o Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to allow the current signage and have •the sign height brought into conformance of 20 feet. Motion . carried by majority vote. Commissioner Moen voting no. o Discussion followed. Applicant stated the sign could not be seen above the canopy and asked if Director Monahan's memo could be taken into consideration. Senior Planner Liden read Mr. Monahan's memo. Further discussion regarding the height. e Commissioner Owens moved and Coi,aissioner Bergmann seconded to recede the previous motion; allow the existing signage and lower the sign height to the point where it will rlear the canopy for visual clearance based on the following finding. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. Sectidn 18.114.145 a. The proposed sign code exception is necessary because a conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance with the sign code standards. 5..3 COMPREHENSIVE- PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 11-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 7-85 SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO. NPO N 5 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Light Industrial and for a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to I-P (Industrial Park); and for a Zone Change on adjacent parcels from I-L (Light Industrial) to I-P (Industrial Park). Located: north of Upper Boones Ferry Road between I-5 and 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1200, lots 100 and 600; WCTM 281 120A, lots 100 & 101). Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION a Dwaine pore, 520 SW Yamhill, Portland, concurred with the staff rip'ort Bind was available for questions. PLANNING COMISSIOWMINM8 Octobers, 1985 Page .2 PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Consensus of the Commission was to support the change. # Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to forward CPA 11-85 and ZC 7-85 to City Council with a recommendation for approval based on staff's findings and recommendation and the applicant's findings. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 14-85 NATIONAL APPLICANT CO./HEINICKE INSTRUMENTS NPO N 2 Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o David 0. Sant, 3a-Sant Corp, agent for National Applicants, 17090 Arkenstone Drive, Durham, 97224, reviewed the history of the site since 1950. He provided photographs of the area from Highway 217 and Greenburg Road. He explained that the site had a greater potential as a Commercial Use. Most potential purchasers were interested in the site as a commercial use and the site has not been saleable as a industrial park. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o The Consensus of the Commission was to support the change. o Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CPA 12-85 and ZC 14-85 to the City Council with a recommendation for approval based on staff's findings and conclusions. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. RECESS 8:45 P.M. RECONVENE 8:53 P.M. 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 13-85 ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-85 ROSEBUD ENTERPRISES INC./U.S. CREDIT LOAN SERVICE NPO N 7 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Octobe`r'8, 1995 Page 3 M STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM October S. 1985 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH `',CHO OL 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General In CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 11-85) and Zone Change (ZC 7-85) REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Light Industrial :and for a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to I-P (Industrial Park) and for a Zone Change on adjacent parcels from I-L (Light Industrial) to I-P (Industrial) , APPLICANT: Southern Pacific Industrial Dev. Co. OWNER: same 520 SW Yamhill Portland, OR 97204 LOCATION: 38 acre area immediately north of Upper Boones Ferry Road between I-5 and 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12DD, T.L. 100 and 600, WCTM 2S1 120A, T.L. 100 and 101) 2. Background Partition approval was granted for the northern parcel in 1969 (MLP 15-79), but the division apparently was never finalized. 3. Vicinity Information As noted above, the properties involved in this application are bounded by I-5, Upper Boones Ferry Road, and 72nd Avenue. A large property owned by Ford Motor Company, which is zoned I-L, lies immediately north. Except for several small parcels zoned C -G (Commercial General) at the southwest corner of the I-5/Upper Scholls Ferry interchange, all of the nearby properties are zoned I-L. Upper Boones Ferry Road is classified as an arterial street and 72nd Y Avenue is identified as a major collector street. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The portion of the property to be changed from residential to industrial use includes the Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park which is scheduled for a closure on December 31, 1985. The remaining property which is the R subject of the zone change proposal from I-L to T-P is being utilized by `• Southern Pacific Transportation Company for vehicle distribution. a$- PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT - CPA b ZC 7-85 - 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has no objection to the requost but it is noted LhaL 2L tt-o H iyhw,ty Divi•,iun sturu ld be g ivicert !.lw �ipportun i l,y Lo r_cmuueriL upon future development proposals because of Lhe potential traffic impact upon the freeway interchange and the signal at 72nd Avenue and Upper Boones Ferry Road. The Building Inspection Division and NPO #5 have no objection to the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 5.1.4, 6.1.1. 7.1.2, 7.6.1. 8.1.3, and the Locational Criteria for industrial development (Section 12,3; . Since the Tigard Comprehensive Plan has recently been acknowledged by LCOC, it is no longer necessary to address the Statewide Planning Goals. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. 2. Policy 5.1.4 is satisfied because the zone change will allow for a more desirable land use pattern from the standpoint of compatibility. The present R-12 zone was applied to reflect the existing use of the property rather than to advocate the continuation of residential uses on the subject property. The Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park is an isolated residential use which is completely surrounded by industrial and commercial properties. The proposed change from residential to industrial use will not encroach upon any residential neighborhoods. 3. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the Community Development code allows for mobile home parks as a permitted or conditional use in all of the residential zoning districts except R--1 and R-2. So although this proposal will eliminate a small 56 unit mobile home park which contributes to the diversity of housing options in Tigard, the Code provides sufficient opportunities for this type of residential use to be established in other areas of the City. 4. Policy 7.1.2, 7.6.1 and 8.1.3 are satisfied because adequate service capacity for public water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, fire protection and streets exist. Specific arrangements to utilize these facilities will be made when the property develops. ~, STAFF REPORT - CPA 11-85 S ZC 7-85_ — PAGE 2 • 5. Section 12.3.1 has been addressed by the applicant and the staff concurs with the analysis presented which shows that the proposal is consistent with this portion of the Plan. Both the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Zone Change requests must comply with the criteria noted above because a Comprehensive Plan designation of Light Industrial and a Zone designation of I-P (Industrial Park) is sought in both cases. The conversion of the one parcel from R-12 to I-P is appropriate considering present circumstances relating to location and the predominance of industrial and commercial uses in the area. The same criteria apply to Zone Change requests from I--L and I-P. Subsequently, a change from I-L to I-P is regarded as a minor adjustment that will typically be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends approval of CPA 11-85 and ZC 13-85. PREPARED BY: Keith Liden APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Planning & Development (KSL:pm/1945P) STAFF REPORT - CPA 11-85 & ZC 7--85 - PAGE 3 PROPOSAL FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE SANTA FE PACIFIC SITE TIGARD, OREGON Prepared for; Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation August 1985 prepared by Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.C. 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street Portland, Oregon 91201 sQ F_. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Site Location and Description B. External Conditions C. Existing Zoning and Proposed Zone Changes II. APPROVAL CRITERIA - Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Map Change) A. Statewide Goals and Guidelines B. Consistency with Other Plan Policies C. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2 III. APPROVAL CRITERIA - Zone Change (Map Change) A. Comprehensive Plan Policies B. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Pian, Volume 2 C. Consistency with Other Provisions of the Community Development Code IV. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC ISSUES V. SUMMARY VI. ATTACHMENTS A. List of Property Owners Within 250 Feet B. Vicinity Map C. Fee D. Indication of Ownership iwsmow C I. INTRODUCTION A. Site Location and Description The following material is submitted on behalf of Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation for the property described in the table below: Property Summary Description Size 2S1-120D T.L. 100 9.35 ac. 2S1-12DD T.L. 500 2.39 ac. 2S1-120A T.L. 100 21.86 ac. 2S1-12DA T.L. 101 4.25 ac. The site is bounded by the I-5 freeway on the east, S.W. Carman Drive on the south, S.W. 72nd Avenue on the west, and a parcel owned by Ford Motor Company on the north. It includes the 'Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park which is f scheduled for closure on 12/31/85, and a tract being used by Southern Pacific Transportation Company for vehicle distribution. The two portions of the site have distinct characteristics. The Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park slopes moderately to the east, upward toward I-5. There are some substantial trees, including a dense stand of young conifers along the freeway, but no old or significant trees. The area west of the actual former mobile home sites has been filled and is covered with wild grass and greeds. The vehicle distribution portion of the site is largely paved, with several relatively small industrial type buildings and rail spurs. This portion of the site has been substantially graded for vehicular access, leaving a cut bank along part of the freeway frontage. This area has extremely high visibility from the freeway, which is above the overall site grade. The site contains no natural water features and is entirely above the 100 year floodplain. Storm runoff, which is considerable from the large existing paved area, now runs through a combination of surface, pipes and ditches, and ultimately into Fanno Creek to the west. There are no apparent significant soil constraints, although a soils analysis has yet to be performed. There is a record of soils inspection and recommendation with respect to the filled area between Terrace Heights and the railroad, but it is unclear without future research whether this area will have any adverse conditions for future construction. -1- Since there is no existing vegetation, surface water hazards, or significant structures on the site, there are no physical constraints to the development of subject property. B. Local External Conditions The subject property is at a lower overall elevation than the freeway. Therefore, the site enjoys considerable exposure over a large portion of the site area. Ideally, the site development will capitalize on this opportunity to provide an enhanced major focal point from the freeway. The full freeway interchange at S.W. Carman Drive, and the improved S.W. 72nd Avenue, provide excellent access to the site. The actual location and design of the access points will be attentive to grades and visibility, while initiating an effective internal circulation system. The area surrounding the site may be characterized as a developing multi-use industrial area. Recent site developments are of good quality, visually attractive and serve traditional clientele. All local governmental services are provided by the City of Tigard, including planning, zoning, building permits, police and other municipal services. Fire protection services are provided in conjunction with the Tualatin Fire Department. The Tigard dater District provides public water, while sewer is provided by the City of Tigard and the Unified Sewerage Agency. C. Existing Zoning and Proposed Zone Change The portion of the site occupied by Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park is designated Residential and is zoned "R-12". The balance of the property in question is designated Industrial and is zoned "I-L". At this time, the long term mix of uses for the total site has yet to be determined. For this reason, flexibility in use and building configuration is important for the future development of this property. The initially envisioned concepts include highway oriented activities near the S.W. Carman Drive/I-5 frontage, plus office and "flex" commercial/industrial space on the balance of the site. With this in mind, the Owner requests a Comprehensive Pian Amendment and Zone Change for Terrace Heights property from Residential ("R-1211) to Industrial ("I-P"). Likewise, the Owner requests for the remaining portion of the site zoned Industrial "I-L" to be rezoned to "I-P". The following information shows that this proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and accompanying Zone Changes meet the City of Tigard's criteria for approval of such requests. -2- .4 YI. APPROVAL CRITERIA - Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Map Change) A. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement _ Citizen involvement is achieved through the overall planning process. The City of Tigard has a citizen involvement program which will be applied to this request through review and comment by the neighborhood association. The property owner has also met with the area representative on the Tigard Economic Development Committee. Goal 2 - Land Use Planning The City of Tigard has adopted a Land Use Plan, which is in the process of acknowledgment. Review of this proposal in light of the LCDC Goals is required since acknowledgment has not yet occurred. Goal 3 - Agricultural Lands This goal does not apply since the site is within the Metro Urban Growth Boundary. Goal 4 - Forest Lands This goal does not apply since the site has irretrievably been urbanized. Goal 5 - Open Space, Natural and Scenic Resources Open space wi l l be provided in the form of landscaping, parking areas and pedestrian walkways. The existing natural vegetation on the property occupied by Terrace Heights will be utilized within the landscape plan whenever feasible to do so. The view from Interstate 5 should be comparatively improved and visually pleasing once development is completed. Goal b - Air, Water and Land Resource Quality The site is provided with public water and sewer services, thereby maintaining the quality of the area's water and land resources. The development facilitated by the proposal Pian Amendment will be subject to DEQ Air and Noise Standards. Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Hazards The site's elevation is above the IQO year floodplain, and there are no other known natural hazards on the property. -3- Goal 8 - recreational Needs The recreational needs for the community have been addressed by the Comprehensive Pian, and the site is not identified as being needed for future recreational purposes. Goal 9 -Economy of the Community and State The review of site conditions, which is part of this proposal, shows that the site is not suitable for continued residential use. Further, without inclusion of the site in the larger area available for industrial development, it will not be possible to achieve an economically viable project. Approval of the change will be the first step in the development of a project which will have a significantly positive economic impact in the Tigard area. Goal 10 - Housing The proposed change would eliminate the existing residential designation of this site. However, the residents of Terrace Heights Mobile Home Park are in the process of being relocated to sites more acceptable for residential usage. Review of the locational criteria included in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan clearly shows that the site is more suitable for industrial park use than residential. Further, the 55 residential units that originally were on ( the site are a small proportion of the total housing stock available in the Tigard area. There will be no long term adverse effect of this change on the City's housing policy. Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services A range of services are available for the future development of this site. These services have been introduced within the preceding section. Goal 12 - Transportation See "Traffic Issues" in the following section. Goal 13 - Energy Conservation The future development of this site will address energy conservation during design phases, including orientation, mass and construction materials. Goal 14 - Urbanization This area is well within the urban growth boundary. The future development of this site will aid in the urban infill process, economically utilizing public facilities and services already in place. -4- u a f._ t B. Consistency With Other Plan Policies The policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan follow the format of the LCDC goals, which have been addressed in the preceding section. C. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2 The following responds to the Industrial and Residential Policies which are applicable to the proposed Plan Amendment. 12.3.1(b) SITES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: "(1) Buffered from residential areas to assure that privacy and the residential character of the area are preserved." The proposed change will eliminate potential conflicts between residential and industrial zoned property in the vicinity. The nearest residential area will then become the area east of Interstate 5. "(2) Located on an arterial or collector street and that industrial traffic shall not be channeled through residential areas." The site will access directly to S.W. 72nd and S.W. Carman Drive, which are designated as major collectors. An accompanying traffic analysis indicates the adequacy of the access to the site. "(3) The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for short and long range needs of the use." The property under consideration will be developed, along with adjacent tracts totalling about 38 acres. Therefore, the site will be adequate in size and shape for both the short and long range needs for the envisioned development. "(4) The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provisioned services can be mitigated." At this time specific site development plans have yet to be undertaken. However, during future development of this site appropriate engineering techniques will be engaged to comply with the Development Code Standards. "(5) It can be demonstrated that associated lights, noise and other external effects will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties." The surrounding properties are used similarly to the envisioned use of the subject property. Therefore, the external effects from the future development will be compatible with nearby activities. -5- (5) All other applicable plan policies can be met As demonstrated previously, when addressing the LCDC Goals, all applicable Plan policies can be met. III. Approval Criteria - Zone Change (Map Change) This proposal wi 11 change the R-12 zoning on the property described in the preceding section to I-P and the adjacent property also owned by the Applicant, from I-L to I-P. The information presented previously (Approval Criteria - Comprehensive Plan Amendment) shows the justification for the change from R-12 to I-P on the Terrace Heights site. Therefore, this information will not be restated. In demonstrating the justification for the Zone Change for the remainder of the site, reference will be directed to previous statements and site specific information will be presented when applicable. A. Comprehensive Plan Policies Due to the similarity in location, natural features, available public sewers and envisioned usage for the two adjacent properties, the information presented previously in response to the LCDC Goals and Guidelines is generally app licable to the City's fPlan ollowing may be separately addressed relate to the area now zoned I-L. In addition, the 9 policies m Housing Policy: This policy is not applicable to the property because the present use, existing zoning and proposed zoning deals with industrial ramifications. Urbanization Policy: Since this property is presently planned, zoned and utilizedi t industrial use bed oheeffectsed ofuse theis a poposedzAntal changechange in othe use urbanization policy. B. Locational Criteria in Cha ter 12 of the Plan Volume 2 As noted above, the two sites in question are contiguous, similar in physical features and have available a full range of public services. Furthermore, both sites are being planned as a unified project for future development. Therefore, the responses presented to "Locational are applicable here,for exceptthe Comprehensive Plan Amendment, as noted previously "c. The site shall be of a size and shape which will provide for the short and long range needs of the use." The site is of sufficient size and shape, together with the former Terrace Heights site, for the activities allowed by the Plan and Zoning. The City maintains the opportunity to review the actual site development through the Design Review process. -6- .r. "d. The land intended for development shall have an average site topography of less than 6% grade, or that it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated." The subject property overall conforms with the above requirement. Although future site plan have yet to be conducted, if any area does not meet the above requirements, appropriate engineering measures will be utilized to mitigate any topographical limitations. C. Consistency with Other Provisions of the Community Development Code Any Community Development Code provisions not addressed above will apply directly to the review of site development plans. Since this request is for a zone change, the City will have a further opportunity for review of site development plans through the Design Review process. IV. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC ITEMS ' The following will briefly describe traffic considerations with respect to the proposed rezoning, in order to assess the degree of potential impact on adjacent streets. Specific measures, if any, to accommodate traffic will be addressed in the future as site development designs are formulated. li The "Terrace Heights' mobile home park, which is proposed to be redesignated to industrial, accommodated 56 residential units. Based upon .51 trips/unit during the PM peak, a total of 29 trips would be generated. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, classification #130 (Industrial Parks) indicates 12.6 PM peak hour trips per acre. The Terrace Heights site (9.3 acres) would therefore generate 117 PM peak hour trips. Both S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Carman Drive are designated as Major Collectors; with a design capacity of 1800 vph and 3600 vph, respectively. The increased PM peak hour volume on S.W. Carman Drive, as a result of the proposed change, is so small that the rezoning of the site will not increase traffic volumes sufficiently to lower the level of service of the primary access route. Since the intersection of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W. Carman Drive has been recently rebuilt and signalized, no problems are expected as a result of the minimal increase in volume due to the rezoning. The rezoning of the larger site from I-L to I-P will similarly have a minimal traffic impact since the ITE Trip Generation rates for "industrial parks" (#130) and "light industrial" 0110) are 10.9 trips/acres and 10.1 trips/acre in the PM peak hour. This amounts to sn increase of 30 trips over the 38 acre site under the industrial park rate, as opposed to the light industrial rate. The access points to the site will require specific design analysis to accommodate the relatively steep slope on S.W. Carman Drive and the existing adjacent driveways on both S.W. Carman Drive and S.W. 72nd Avenue. These are design considerations, €' but are not expected to inhibit adequate access to the site. -7- F s • This site has much better vehicular access than many comparable sites in the area due to proximity to 1-5 and recent improvements to S.W. 72nd Avenue. Since site development will be phased, the city will have the opportunity to monitor conditions and assure that an adequate level of service is maintained. V. SUMMARY The above discussion has provided a general site description, explanation of the proposal, approval criteria have been addressed and traffic issues have been reviewed. It has been shown that the proposed plan amendment is appropriate in light of the review criteria, and in order to allow a logical site development. Further, the change will not significantly affect the inventory of residential land in the City, and will prevent undesirable land use conflicts. The proposed Zone Change for the entire site similarly will meet the approval criteria, and will encourage the development of a project of greater community benefit. The Applicant therefore requests approval of the proposed Plan and Zone Changes. F �1 a i� } Ell. � > I VICINITY NAP: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL TO, ,ODSTRIAL SANTA FE PACIFIC REALTY CORPORATION Aup�+t. 1'llt5 t. 1X,, El I VNt� t r 33 a p O i •` 3� a faea • �• t _ 42 .0I Isik _ i VICINITY rAp: ZONE CNANGE I-L TO I-P SANTA FE PAC1fIC ° t REALTY CORPORATION August 1"s U v4ksir4G10N axx iiY.OREGON t eiP!=KSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ZONE CRANGEAZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE N0. RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION near S.W. 72nd and Carman (A) Application form (1) Drive (B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2SM 12DAi T.L. 100 and 101; authorization 2S1-12DD, T.L. 600 (C) Applicants statement SITE SIZE _ approximately 28 ac. (15 copies) ROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Southern Pac. Ind. Dev. . Co. i (D) Filing fee (� ) (agent fo 55 pp. Tr ns CC ) �$RgSS 926 W. �amfiiTQ' PHONE 222-2867 Additional information for Compre- CITY Por an , regon ZIP 97204 sive Plan Map Amenduents/Zone Changes APPLICANT* (E) Maps indicating property ADDRESS PHONE location (15 copies) CITY ZIP (F) List of property owner* *When the owner and the applicant are different within 250 feet (1) people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record (G) Assessor's Map (1) or a leasee in possession with written authorization (H) Title transfer instrument (1) from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(*) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: applicable) from to and a Zone Mange from I-L to I-P 0 N.P.O. Number: OR The applicant requests an amendment to the Planning Commission Approval Date: following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code City Council Approval Date: (KSL:pm/0737P) i f 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: plan/zone change on abutting property 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attacbsents described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S), SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that say be attached to or imposed upoa the subject�pro erty. S. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. A11 of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 20th day of August lg 85 --- ------ SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. Southern Pac. Ind. Dev. Co. 8 (KSL:pm/O737P) r C17YOF TI6ARD wAsH"GToN axwax OREGON COMPREHENSIVE PANAMENDMENT/ZONA GE ZONE ORDINANCIE AMENDMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 Sia Ash, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION former site of "Terrace (A) Application form (1) Heights" Mobile Horne Park (B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT N0. M-12DD T.L. 100 authorization (C) Applicant's statement SITE SIZE 9.35 ac. (15 copies) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Southern Pac. Ind. Dev. Co. (D) Filing fee (# ) ii .lBESS 520 S.W. Yamhill PHONE 222-2867 Additional inforna.tion for Compre- CITY Portland, OR ZIP 97204 sive Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes APPLICANT* (E) Maps indicating property ADDRESS PHONE location (15 copies) CITY ZIP _ (F) List of property owners *When the owner and the applicant are different within 250 feet (1) people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record (G) Assessor's Map (1) or a leasee in possession with written authorization (H) Title transfer instrument (1) from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: applicable) from roidential to industrial and a Zone Change from R-12 to N.P.O. Number: OR The applicant requests an amendment to the Planning Commission Approval Date: following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code �- City Council Approval Date: (KSL:pm/0737P) r t 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: zone change on abutting property 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. S. THE APPLICANT(S). SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 20th day of August 19 85 t SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. Southern Pacific Ind. Dev. Co. (RSL:pm/0737P) CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 17, 1985 _ PREVIOUS ACTION: Recommendation of nninComm. 10!6/85 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: approval by Comm. PREPARED BY: Keith Liden CPA 12 85/ZC 14-85 A y REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On October 8, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Light Industrial to Commercial General and Zone Change from I-P to C-G and recommended approval of the request, lic The applicant's statement, staff report, and minutes are attached. The app nt also submitted a request to have the change adopted by declaring an emergency if the Council approves the application. ALl"ERNATIWES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt an ordinance approving CPA 12-85/ZC 14-85. 2. Deny the request. - SUGGESTED ACTION Alternative 1. (KSL:pm/2010P) David D.Sant Corporate Headquarters Portland Office The Equitable Center.Sole 320 2300 S.W.first Avenue•Sole 700 530 Center St NE..Salem.OR 97301 Portland.OR 97201 (503)581-8904 (503)224-4548 October 10, 1985 D Mr. Keith Liden Senior Planner CC T 15 190 C85 � City of Tigard PO Box 23397 CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, OR 97223 PLANNING DEPT. Dear Keith: Peter Mersereau and I wish to again thank you and members of the Tigard Planning Commission with respect to the unanimous endorsement for changing National Appliance Company's (NAPCn) property from light industrial to general commercial. Based on the reception given Iso Iul-sday evening by the commission, I suspect we'll also receive a similar reception from the City Council at its October 28th meeting. Since there has been no opposition to NAPCO's comprehensive plan and zone change request by nearby property owners, or the public at large, we wish to request that the Tigard City Council, upon its approval of the general commercial zone, issue an emergency declaration so that the C-G zone will become effective that evening -- rather than waiting thereafter for the typical 30 day period to expire. As I mentioned at the meeting, Ja-Sant Corporation has contacted over 750 Industrial companies in which to expose the MAPCO property. The response by the industrial users has been less than enthusiastic; however, the reaction by commercial prospects for the building has been ,just the opposite. But, generally speaking, they are extremely hesitant to consider the property until the applic- able commercial zone is effective. Thank you again for your assistance. Sincerely, JA-S CORPORATION Da dd D. Sant President DDS/ss cc: Mr. Frank W. Enderlin, National Appliance Company Mr. Howard A. Rankin, Rankin, McMurry, VavRosky & Doherty Mr. Peter R. Mersereau, Rankin, McMurry, VavRosky & Doherty TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING — OCTOBER 8, 1985 t- 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut — LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Owens, Peterson. Bergmann, and Leverett. Absent: Commissioner Fyre, Vanderwood, and Campbell. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Commission Owens moved and Commissioner Bergmann .seconded to approve the Minutes from September 10, 1985, as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote. Commissioner. Leverett abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION o Commissioner Butler reviewed information from the seminar that he had attended, presented by the Oregon Planning: Institute in Eugene on October 4th. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENT NPO N 3 DONALD OLSON Senior Planner Liden explained that this item had been set over from the previous hearing because no contact had been made with Mr. Olson. Since then staff had contacted Mr. Olson, who stated he would attend the meeting.' Mr. Olson was not present. Commission Peterson moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set this item over to the and of the meeting to give Mr. Olson 'an opportunity to show. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's,present. .8,2 SINN CODE EXCEPTIOk SCE 3-85 TIGARD AROOIDENNIS THOMPSON NPO N 1 Request to allow an increase in the height of an existing freestanding sign to approximately 30' where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately .110 square feet per side where 72 square feet is permitted. Located: 12475 SW Main St. (WCT" 2S1 2AB lot 2800). Set over from September 10, 1985. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the history of the changes the sign had gone through since its original construction. Staff was still recommending denial. two pictures showing the sign from Pacific Highway were distributed. Discussion followed regarding the size of the different parts of the sign. tv ; s { tG flW' I88N KlUTEB Octoblr .8, 1985 Purge i PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Consensus of the Commission was to support the change. * Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to forward CPA 11-85 and ZC 7-85 to City Council with a recommendation for approval based on staff's findings and recommendation and the applicant's findings. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners ` present. ' 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 14-85 NATIONAL APPLICANT CO./HEINICKE INSTRUMENTS NPO # 2 Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o David D. Sant, Ja-Sant Corp, agent for National Applicants, 17090 Arkenstone Drive, Durham, 97224, reviewed the history of the site since 1960. He provided photographs of the area from Highway 217 and Greenburg Road. He explained that the site had a greater potential as a Commercial Use. Most potential purchasers were interested in the site as a commercial use and the site has not been saleable as a industrial park. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o The Consensus of the Commission was to support the change. o Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CPA 12-85 and ZC 14-85 to the City Council with a recommendation for approval based on staff's findings and conclusions. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. RECESS 8:45 P.M. RECONVENE 8:53 P.M. 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 13-85 ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-85 ROSEBUD ENTERPRISES INC./U.S. CREDIT LOAN SERVICE NPC N 7 Request for a Comprehensive Plan ;f4ondment from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/Aare) to R-25 (Residential, 25 ,units/acre). PLA0NXW COMMISSION! MINUTES October 9; 1985 Page 3 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM OCTOBER B. 1985 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 12-85 and Zone Change (Z-- 14-85) ZC14-85) REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Light Industrial to Commercial General and for a Zone Change from I-P (Industrial Park) to C-G (Commercial General) APPLICANT: National Appliance Co. OWNER: Heinicke Instruments Co. P.O. Box 1000 3000 Taft St. Tualatin, OR 97062 Hollywood, FL 33301 LOCATION: 10855 SW Greenburg Road (WCTM ISI 35BC, T.L. 900) . 2. Background No previous land use proposals have been reviewed by the City regarding this property. 3. Vicinity Information The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Greenburg Road and Q--,�cade Blvd. The parcels to the north and east are zoned C-G (Commercial General) and are developed with service stations, convenience stores, offices, and a mrtal. Light industrial and office uses that are zoned I-P (Industrial Park) occupy the area to the northwest, west, and south. Greenburg Road and Cascade Blvd are classified as major collector streets in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Shady Lane, which intersects Greenburg Road approximately 200 feet north of Cascade Blvd. , is designated as a minor collector. A full interchange with Greenburg Road and State Highway 217 is 600 to 700 feet north of the subject property. 4. Site Information The property is presently developed with a 40,367 square foot industrial building. Access to the parking area serving the property is provided via Cascade Blvd. . The southwestern portion of the property is within the 100 year flood plain of Ash Creek but the building and majority of the parking area is outside of the flood plain. STAFF REPORT - CPA 12-85 b ZC 14-85 - PAGE 1 r The applicant proposes to rezone the property to C-G (Commercial General) to make the facilities available for commercial tenants. Information has been submitted by the applicant supporting the request. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering and Building Inspection Divisions and the State Highway Division have no objection to the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. FINDINGS HND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 7.1.2, 7.6.1, 8.1.3, and the Locational Criteria contained in Section 12.2. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed because the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged by L.C.D.C. . The Planning staff concludes that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change is consistent with the applicable criteria based upon the following findings: 1. Policy 2. 1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. 2. Policies 3.2.1, 3.2.2, and 3.2.3 related to flood plain protection can be satisfied when and if further development occurs on the property. A Sensitive Lands review will be required to determine whether it is appropriate to utilize any portions of the 100 year flood plain. 3. Policy 5.1.1 satisfied because will not cause a reduction of economic opportunities available to Tigard residents. 4. Policy 5.1.4 is met because the proposal will not create an encroachment of commercial use upon a residential area. 5. Policies 7.1.2 and 7.6.1 are met because adequate public water, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and fire protection services are available to the property. Also, the proposal will not create an appreciable change in service demand. 6. Policy 5 .1.3 will be satisfied as a condition of Site Development Review approval, which is required when a conversion to a commercial business occurs. 7. Policy 12.2.1 is met because the subject property is adjacent to an established commercial area which is primarily oriented towards the traffic on Highway 217 and ! the Greenburg Road interchange. Also, all applicable Plan policies and locational criteria have been applied in this / review. STAFF REPORT - CPA 12-85 b ZC 14-85 PAGE 2 J 8. The Locational Criteria relevant to the establishment of a C-G (Commercial General) zone have been properly addressed due to the following factors: 4 a. The property does not abut any residentially zoned parcels. The closest residentially zoned land lies to the southeast on the opposite side of Greenburg Road. b. The applicant has submitted traffic information which discusses the potential impact that could result if the C-G zone is applied to the property. The Engineering Division has reviewed this report prepared by Wilsey and Ham and concur with findings which indicate that there would be a negligible traffic impact. C. Both Greenburg Road and Cascade Blvd. are classified as major collectors and therefore adequate street access is available. d. Tri-Met has regularly scheduled bus routes on Greenburg Road. e. The site can accommodate the existing use as well as a modestly sized commercial use. f. The site has high visibility being located at the intersection of two major collector streets near the Highway 217/Greenburg Road interchange. g. 'The relatively small parcel size (2.87 acres) will limit the scale of any future commercial use of the property to a size that is consistent with surrounding uses. h. The property can be converted to a commercial use without infringing upon other adjoining properties. Any change to a commercial use will require the approval of a Site Development Review application. This review will evaluate buffering, landscaping, lighting, etc. with emphasis placed upon maintaining a compatible relationship with adjacent parcels. C. RECOPMIENOATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning staff recommends approval of CPA 12-85 and ZC 14-85. PR PA D BY: K ith Liden APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Planning b Development (KSL:br/1951P) STAFF REPORT - CPA 12-85 S ZC 14-85 - PAGE 3 1 APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (MAP CHANGE) AND ZONE CHANGE (MAP CHANGE) BY NATIONAL APPLIANCE COMPANY Subject Property: 10855 SW Greenburg Road, Tigard, Oregon. Current Zone: Industrial Park (I-P). Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change Request: Change Comprehensive Plan from Light Industrial to General Commercial, and Zone Change from I-P to G-C. Background: National Appliance Company (NAPCO) acquired the Subject Property -- including the improvements -- in 1960 and operated its business at that location until buying a substantially larger building in Tualatin. At one time the employment level at the Subject Property exceeded 120. During the intervening years that NAPCO operated its business at the site, the landscape and utiliza- tion of property in the immediate area changed in character and complexity. For example, Highway 217 was constructed, providing a major transportation route around the west side of the greater Portland metropolitan suburban area. Indicative with construction of a major freeway is the attraction of commercial companies desiring increased visibility, better access to freeway exits and concentrated shopping areas. In this case, the land near the Subject Property was upgraded with the construction of Washington Square on the north exit of Greenburg Road from Highway 217, and general commercial businesses on the south side, i.e. , Shilo Motor Inn, Mobile Station, Capitol Tire, Good Samaritan Clinic, Willamette Savings, 7-Eleven and Swift Mart convenience stores, etc. Gradually, the land prices, as a result of sales and utilization of property into prime commercial sites, graduated in value until today such property ranges in value from $7.50 sqft to $12.00 sqft --atthe freeway exit. In essence, the value of NAPCO's building has enjoyed a modest appreciation, but the land under the building has accelerated to the point where industrial users cannot justify paying "commercial type prices". When it becameapparentto MAPCO management that the Subject Property would not be able to accommodate planned expansion plans, Ja-Sant Corporation Industrial- Commercial Realtors was employed .to find a new location for the firm. Also, Ja-Sant was responsible for marketing the Subject Property on a for sale basis -- a process that was begun 10 months ago. Since the property is zoned I-P, Ja-Sant began an extensive marketing program to expose the facility to industrial prospects at the local, state and national level. Currently, over 500 companies have been contacted either in person, by telephone or letter, but the responses -- across the board -- indicate the following consensus: 1. The land value, as previously mentioned, reflects current appraisals of $7.50 to $12.00 a sqft at the freeway exit near Washington Square, and the south side of Highway 217 at Greenburg Road. Even though MAPCO is offering the property at less than the fair market price, representatives of firms in the industrial sector say they cannot justify paying such 4: "commercial prices" for the location of manufacturing facilities. Rather, they prefer to pay in the range of $1.50 to $3.00 per sqft, depending on location, utilities in place and access to good, but not crnjested, transportation systems. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change Application Page -2- 2. The I-P zone allows for only 10% retail usage within the building. There- fore, any firm that needs high visibility near a good traffic location -- which usually correlates with extensive commercial utilization -- cannot even consider the site. 3. The property is better suited for a commercial use rather than for an industrial use, since general commercial users surround the property on three sides (separated only by the existing roads). 4. The location is too conjested for industrial users. Such companies do not want their employees and vehicles competing with traffic conjestion at peak hours next to the freeway. The City of Tigard Planning Staff has raised the question that if the Subject Property were rezoned general commercial, traffic generated by a commercial user would aggrevate traffic congestion at Greenburg Road and Cascade Blvd. It should be pointed out that under the present I-P zone, professional and administrative offices are permitted. If the 40,367 sqft Subject Building were converted to a two-story office structure, thus offering as much as 78,000 sqft of floor space, the traffic generated would be greater than that influenced by general commercial. A letter of opinion from Wilsey & Ham Engineers, who specialize in traffic engineering, is enclosed, which supports the fact that present zoning offers a greater problem in traffic generation at peak times as opposed to uses permitted in the general commercial zone. Part II -- Approval Criteria: The following information is in response to the questions applicable to the City of Tigard's Application by MAPCO for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Map Change). 1. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines: Goal No. 9 encourages diver- sification for the betterment of Oregon's economy and people. The goal also provides allowance so that property, with a zone that is outdated because of changes in property utilization, can be considered for a comprehensive plan and zone change to permit appropriate use of the land -- thus lifting the economic constraints to businesses and potential increased job creation. NAPCO's request for a comprehensive plan amendment and zone change complies with the intent of Goal No. 9. 2. Consistency with other Plan Policies: Refer to Comprehensive Plan Policies under D. Zone Change. 3. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2: Refer to D. Zone Change, No. 2. D. Zone Chang` (Map Change). 1. Comprehensive Plan Policies: The proposed zone change for the Subject Property blends well with the applicable policies under Tigard's Comprehensive Plan. Referring to Policy No. 5.1.1, the site certainly complies with economic opportunities available to the city's residents, because the property would be upgraded to general commercial and therefore be of greater interest in general to businesses desirous of locating in a highly visible location. Also, shopping convenience and job creation will be enhanced. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change Application Page -3- Further, with respect to implementation strategies, No. 9, "the city shall encourage new development by allowing more flexible zoning standards within the CBD than are allowed city wide. We believe that NAPCO has established a case which shows that the market value of the land has removed the Subject Property from an industrial use to one of general commercial. 2. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2: Spacing and Location: The general commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts. In fact, the Subject Property is contiguous on the north and east side by general commercial users, separated only by the roads (Cascade Blvd. and Greenburg Road). Access: a. The proposed area for expansion of the existing area will not create traffic conjestion or a traffic safety problem, according to Wilsey & Ham, specialists in traffic engineering, as equal to that under the present I-P zone during peak hours. b. The site has a direct access from a major collector or arterial street. In this case, Greenburg Road offers a major collector off of Highway 217 and an arterial between Tigard and Washington Square. Also minimizing traffic conjestion at the site is the fact that Cascade Blvd. serves as a collector of traffic from Greenburg Road. c. Public transportation is available to the site via Tri-Met which stops immediately across the street on Greenburg Road. Site Characteristics: a. The size of the property, 2.87 acres, can accommodate present and projected uses within a general commercial zone. As many as 100 parking spaces can be made available given expansion of the parking area at the site. b. The site has high visibility along Greenburg Road and immediately at the exit of Highway 217 and Greenburg Road. Impact Assessment: a. The scale of the project is compatible with the surrounding uses. Referring to the enclosed map, the NAPCO property is very compatible with the office buildings, convenience stores, service station. tire dealers, bakery, etc. b. The site configuration and characteristics of the property is such that the privacy of adjacent non-commercial users will be maintained. Immediately west of the property line is a linear drainage ditch which separates the Subject Property from other properties to the west. Also, an access road west of the ditch further separates the Subject Property. C. The unique site features of the property will be able to comply { with the site design and development plan intended for the `-: property. mew Comprehensive Plan. Amendment and Zone Change Application Page -4- d. The associated lights, noise and activity shall not interfere with adjoining non-residential users -- because there are no abutting residential properties within 250 feet. 3. Consistency with Other Provisions of the Community Development Code: The Subject Property is consistent with provisions of the Community Development Code as applicable to the C-G (general commercial district). Focusing on the permitted uses within the C-G zone, the building would be adaptable for civic use types such as public agency administrative services, postal service, public safety facilities and cultural exhibits and library services. Commercial use types such as agricultural sales, amusement enterprises, animal sales and services, business support services and all the other commercial use types, with the exception of a day care facility, could be adaptable with the property. The dimensional requirements in a C-G district comply readily with the intended use of the Subject Property in a general commercial zone. The minimum landscaping requirement of 15% poses no problem. Other requirements such as off-street parking, access and egress, signs, etc. are also compatible. Summary: The overall response by prospective buyers, the proximity of the site to Washington Square and a freeway exit on Highway 217, and the C-G zone on three sides of the property give ample justification for a comprehensive plan amendment from light industrial to general commercial, and a zone change from I-P to C-G. 8/15/85 1 WAISH ING TON ' o SQUARE t , c_ -7t • 26 - P 2 4k IM 4-5 COUN j f apllrr a••rr• 1ko _ � {- ea> •— r�. J_• il =--i—• - --- �rl� t®! �� \l.� �-� c, +` � j� w �Grp R-1 Z 77 ....� L � 1.1 -.� t .. .•. • \ R L ax- . � � R 4. 5 --- \ (PDQ; . . t - m t t 1 FOWLER ; z , jai JR. HIGH SCHOOL � `�r << .�. 7 li 521 SAV Elcvcnth Vcnuc/Itttrtland.Utc_on't7_0; 4 (i63)_"7-I I-t„ MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Keith Liden, Senior Planner City of Tigard FROM: Gary D. Katsion, P.E. DATE: August 29, 1985 RE: National Appliance Company (NAPCO) Property at 10855 SW Greenburg Road Traffic Generation Assessment 4-1660-0401-15 The purpose of this assessment is to document the potential trip generation impacts associated with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change application for the subject property. Specific issues to be discussed in this memorandum include: o Trip generation estimates for uses permitted on Industrial Park District (I-P) and General Commercial (G-C) zoned property, a Discussion of existing site access and neighboring street system, o Potential traffic impacts. l This assessment considers only general trip generation impacts in the immediate vicinity of the site. The current construction activities on Oregon Highway 217 and its resultant shift in travel patterns in Tigard prevented a quantitative analysis of the Cascade Boulevard and Greenburg Road intersection. These study parameters were agreed upon in discussions with the City of Tigard Planning Department and David D. Sant in August, 1985. Trip Generation Estimates Trip generation estimates for the redevelopment of the NAPCO property have been compiled for eleven possible land uses permitted on I-P and G-C zoned property. An estimate of the vehicle trips generated by the past operations of NAPCO was made for comparison purposes. The table on the following page shows the average weekday vehicle trip-end (AWDVTE) estimates for the possible uses. The trip gene tion estimates were developed using the Institute of Transporation Engineers Trip Genera ,on lteport, Third Edition and "Fourteenth Progress Report on Trip Ends Generation "f° earch Count" by the State of California Department of Transportation as sources for t,.p rate factors. The size of development for each possible land use assumed redevelopment of the existing building on the site. An examination of the AWDVTE estimates reveals two distinct ranges for daily trip generation from the possible redeveloped site. Land uses in the first range, of between 150 and 300 trip-ends per day, include four traditional industrial uses (general light industrial, industrial park, manufacturing and warehousing) plus the furniture store retail use. All of these uses would produce about the same number of daily trips as the MAPCO operations. The second range of daily trip generation with values between 1200 and 2825 trip-ends consisted of the office building and general retail uses. public improvements engineering-deeehtpment scn ices•public pniico, plannrn);an(i atnal%%is-_envintmnental affairs-sun•ecinl;and mapping i"ort land.f)rekon• Puster City.CaIifurni:r•UUhltn.(,aIiiunna-In ine.(:aIIIorma•Prem+t.C.tiifontia-ikilccuc.%visItin,;t(in-Iknvcr.C(tlt)radIt 11 1 11 � u p � u I J p Y" J dI V I C J L CP h 1i O U Q N. M Cd C n v 1 r Yl P h. < LL jj r 1 rZ+ 11 PC'V Y P n N it r. r r CJ N N ; A N Z N I W h 0 N a Q E p t i ¢.Z-. q n W P C, G 1 Q h7 N O O tl p Pi M Ci N N Y) In I N N — `C w p r r t LL p I l- Y p r0 N A n W .r 1 N M A fd R N N N Y - 0j ,O 1 N Ni N N -0 r r 1 r 1 p 1 Q tl I p I p 1 !- M P m N CD C I N M 00` M O i OiL N O O O O r N �+ t 4 •. N .+ + � p 1 Q p n O v N Pn M i A W 0 O M WH n �+ N N V Ih M N h Q P r N w Z 6n q O O O O G O G I O + N ccC ZZ i U Q m Q F• YP n_ -a �0 �0 a �O i P w n N G n W Ci n X O p 6 N N -• M N 1 O Y7 p7 N O Ix ..W d 'O O a N v N N O N W 1 0• W 67 iC) G P. w2 17 u LL Z N M P n Y'1 IA P 0, i O Y7 Yl N O u Q tY .r M .r •• i O G O O r CI U)C1 2 d CJ J I > 2►+ q •• .0 O d M O u'1 1 w .0 G O 0 ? O W m F N O Q O M m G Q 1 N IC) M q M 0. > Y LL N h n M R -Z O 1 �0 <� r O �:+ O tY—�L .. N I r7 N n R I d t21 BIL uj LOW q MO- Y 4 U. w LL LL LL LL i LL LL LL LL LL .0 la U- E e E ul to ul W in ul t ui W (A ul (0 a d a W w Z N w 19 W L'JtJ 17 1.7 i W W W iJ w` W yd,U )E S N O C• O 0 0C. 0 C i v tG '.� � � � 2 p to ZZ Cly. .7S M C. p + !7 M G ! F. t? (`� M t; tl O to w p v G G O W co I O G J O O q 1. w N M c c v v n n I 4 c -T w v W L7 I u) Y 1 w p p ~ul O u7 at-a tl j QS. LL ZLo p 1 3Etnw N i x W W W 0 p I i S 4- u 1 IN ~ 1 ., .d+ z s iC p 1 r L I A p .+ 1 .• c .+ in O u mI " u a IW-w p I Cc .. aw q d c 1 0c w a Y 3 L L 1 L d d d d x IL J p O C $5 c „ ! y rz 6 O O d m 0:� C w p a c L c w L 1 O N N q W A J N 7 O ! IW d L a A N Z CL N m ti I Z L n d .+ Z Y O .+ L u 3 .+ 10 7 E N l C Q N N Nt +1 O O d I N sj ar A 9 w N J N O L W 4. L L u ( .. = O p CL v d > > d d •~ tv c d w u u w p ( d c 10 c L c `� 1 t L E L 0d ►' p ++ Q d c 0 tY d I's :IO 4 -.s n O I Z t9 ... E 3 l7 O 1 LL Z I O En Z (` Likewise, an examination of the a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip estimates reveals two distinct ` groups of trip generation characteristics. The first group includes the I-P zone uses, which are almost exclusively employment ce-titers. The office park snd industrial hark estimates include small amounts of retail usage. These uses produce highly directional travel patterns during the peak hours as employees drive to and from work. The second group includes the C-G zone uses, whose travel patterns are influenced predominantly by the customers of the stores. The normal customer produces two trip-ends per hour (one entering the site and one leaving the site), thus the equal directional distribution of peak hour trips. In terms of the number of peak hour trips generated by the eleven possible uses, only three (general office, office park and specialty retail center) would produce more a.m. peak hour trips than the NAPCO operations. However, only four uses (general light industrial, industrial park and manufacturing and furniture store) would produce less p.m. peak trips than the NAPCO operations. Existing Site Access and Street System The subject property currently has two access driveways on Cascade Boulevard, a City of Tigard designated major collector street. Cascade Boulevard is a two-lane asphalt paved street that serves industrial and commercial properties to the southwest of Highway 217 between Scholls Ferry Road and Greenburg Road. The property also fronts on Greenburg Road, but does not have any access driveways on this frontage. Greenburg Road is a two- lane asphalt paved street with turn lanes at major intersections and its interchange with Highway 217. Greenburg Road is a City designated arterial street which provides access between Tigard and the Washington Square/Garden Home areas. intersection is present controlled by a stop l+. The Greenburg Road and Cascade Boulevard p Y x sign on the Cascade Boulevard approach. A commercial driveway directly across from Cascade Boulevard forms the fourth leg of the intersection. A left turn lane has been provided on the northbound Greenburg Road approach. The Cascade Boulevard approach consists of separate left and right turn lanes. NAPCO donated the property to the City to provide enough right-of-way to allow this lane configuration. Potential Traffic impacts Although a complete quantitative analysis of the traffic impacts to the surrounding street system cannot be made due to insufficient traffic volume data, general traffic impacts from the redevelopment of the property can be assessed. According to the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan, major collector streets like Cascade Boulevard have a desirable volume of between 3,000 and 10,000 daily vehicles. Cascade Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property, has an existing average daily traffic volume of about 3,500 vehicles. Also, according to the Comprehensive Plan, arterial streets have a desirable volume of between 6,000 and 20,000 daily vehicles. Greenburg Road has an average daily traffic volume of about 16,000 vehicles to the north of Cascade Boulevard. Redevelopment of the property with any of the examined C-G permitted uses would not cause the daily traffic volumes to exceed the desirable volume levels for Cascade Boulevard or Greenburg Road. The peak hour traffic impacts created by the redevelopment of the property are determined by the traffic operations at the surrounding intersections. Traffic operations at intersections are influenced by geometric configuration of the intersection, traffic control devices present and the traffic volume movements in each direction. For this assessment, { only the relative traffic volume movements from the redeveloped site have been used to ntersection. estimate traffic impacts at the Greenburg Road and Cascade Boulevard i During both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, the commercial retail uses would produce a better balanced directional flow of trips at the intersection than the industrial or office uses. In terms of the number of trips generated by the redevelopment of the site, the office building uses are anticipated to produce over two times as many vehicles during the a.m. peak hour than the other uses. In the p.m. peak hour the office building uses are again estimated to generate more than twice as many vehicles leaving the property than the average retail commercial user. Based on these general peak hour trip characteristics, it is anticipated that there would be relatively little difference between the a.m. peak hour traffic impacts at the intersection due to the redevelopment of the property as a traditional industrial or retail commercial use. In the p.m. peak hour, the retail commercial uses, with the exception of a furniture store, would have a greater impact than the traditional industrial uses. The furniture store would have less Impact than the traditional industrial uses. However, in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, the potential for the greatest traffic impact from the redeveloped site occurs with the office building and office park, permitted I-P uses. x4. s . OCA . Y ., CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON �~ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 17, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Recommendation of ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: denial by Planning Comm. 10/8185 CPA 13/85/ZC 15--85 PREPARED BY: Keith Liden U.S. Creditcorp REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �� _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: — POLICY ISSUE One policy issue has surfaced relating to the application of specific standards found in the Locational Criteria section of the Comprehensive Plan. Several standards are related to distance from commercial centers, direct access to streets with specified functional classifications, availability of public transportation, etc. When these types of standards are applied, it is easily determiner) if the proposal complies. However, the Plan states that "locational criteria be construed in a flexible manner. . .". The staff and Commission have based their recommendations upon a litcaral interpretation of the criteria. - �INFORMATION SUMMARY On October 8, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and Zone Change from R-12 to R-25 and recommended denial of the request. The applicant's statement, staff report, and minutes are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt an ordinance approving CPA 13/85/ZC 15-85. 2. Deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION f Alternative 2. (KSL:pm/2010P) TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING — OCTOBER 8, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut — LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Owens, Peterson, Bergmann, and L@Verett. Absent: Commissioner Fyre, Vanderwood, and Campbell. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Commission Owens moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to approve the Minutes from September 10, 1985, as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote. Commissioner. Leverett abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION o Commissioner Butler reviewed information from the seminar that he had attended, presented by the Oregon Planning Institute in Eugene on October 4th. S. PUBLIC.HEARINGS 5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENT NPO N 3 DONALD OLSON Senior Planner Liden explained that this item had been sat over from the previous hearing because no contact had been made with Mr. Olson. Since then staff had contacted Mr. Olson, who stated he would attend the meeting. Mr. Olson was not present. Commission Peterson moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to set this item over to the and of the meeting to give Mr. Olson `an opportunity to show. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner's,.present. .'S.2 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIOW SCE 3-85 TIGARD ARCO/DENNIS THOMPSON NPO N 1 Request to allow an increase in the height of an existing freestanding sign to approximately 30' where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately .110 square feet per side where 72 square feet is permitted. Located: 12475 SW Main St. (WCTM 2S1 2AB lot 2800). Set over from September 10, 1985. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the history of the changes the sign had gone through since its original construction. Staff was still recommending dental. Two pictures showing the sign from Pacific Highway were distributed. Discussion followed regarding the size of the different parts of the sign. zt isstoa NXNUMo, •a., 1965 page 1 t PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED a Consensus of the Commission was to support the change. # Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to forward CPA 11-85 and ZC 7-85 to City Council with a recommendation for approval based on staff's findings and recommendation and the applic:�nt's findings. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. - - 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-85 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 14-85 NATIONAL APPLICANT CO./HEINICKE INSTRUMENTS NPA # 2 Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal and made staff's recommendation for approval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o David D. Sant, 3a-Sant Corp, agent for National Applicants, 17090 Arkenstone Drive, Durham, 97224, reviewed the history of the site since 1960. He provided photographs of the area from Highway 217 and Greenburg Road. He explained that the site had a greater potential as a Commercial Use. Most potential purchasers were interested in the site as a commercial use and the site has not been saleable as a t. industrial park. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o The Consensus of the Commission was to support the change. o Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CPA 12-65 and ZC 14-85 to the City Council with a recommendation for approval based on staff's findings and conclusions. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. RECESS 8:45 P.M. RECONVENE 8:53 P.M. 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 13-85 ZONE CHANGE ZC 15-85 ROSEBUD ENTERPRISES INC./U.S. CREDIT LOAN SERVICE NPO # 7 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). 'PLANNING commrSSION HINUTES October 8, 1995 Page 3 Senior Planner Liden reviewed the zoning on the surrounding properties and made staff's recommendation for denial because all of the locational criteria had not been met. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Joe Van lam, Architect, 34 NW 1st, representing the applicant, reviewed the site explaining why it would make an ideal site for a multi=family development. He noted that the site was within 3/4 of a mile from a regional shopping center, there are existing duplexes to provide buffering to single family residential zone, it is only 1/4 of a mile to Greenburg Road which is a major collector street. They had also investigated the condition of the bridge and there were no major problems and no flooding problems. - o Glen McCurdy, Rosebud Enterprises, stated that an earlier proposal had been approved by the Planning Commission for increased density, but had been withdrawn later in the process. The property is the same, the facts are the same, and there were only two locational criteria that they did not meet. He felt the Code was intended to allow flexibility and since Greenburg Road is only .15 miles from the site, shopping is within .35 miles of the site, and North Dakota could be widened with this proposal; the Comprehensive Plan Amendment should be allowed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Richard Boberg, Chairman NPO N 7. The NPO opposed the application. They felt there was an inaccuracy because it would mean that there would be 31 units per acres. He disputed that the flood plain should be 162 not 160. That there is a flooding problem with the bridge and the land is unusable three months out of the year. That the Comprehensive Plan designates North Dakota as a minor collector and the road width has nothing to do with the designation. Concerned that the access would be where the flood plain is. He felt that careful consideration should be given as to how dense we want property to development next to a R--7 and R-12 zones. o Doug Condon. 10570 SW North Dakota opposed the proposal because the density was to high, not conducive to the surrounding properties, and had no benefit for the neighbors. o Betty Cookson, 10520 SW North Dakota, lives directly across the street from the proposed development and opposed the proposal. She had asked the developer if they had seen the property during the winter and they had not. She was concerned with the water and erosion problem which is existing and would increase with this proposal. 'PLANNINGCONM1ISSION`MINUTES October B. 1985 Page 4 REBUTTAL o Joe Van Lam, stated their calculations were based on 6.38 acres which are outside of the flood plain. Their flood plain levels where based on the CH2M Hill study which states the 160 foot elevation. They would not be any buildings in the flood plain. Also, the City is in need of multi—family developments. o Discussion followed regarding the flood plain, density transfer, and density transition. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Peterson felt someone should be thQ authority on the flood plain and he would have to accept the CH2M Hili figures. He was concerned with the problems on North Dakota. o Commissioner Owens- commented that the concept was to have medium density along North Dakota, but nothing higher. North Dakota is a minor collector according to the Comprehensive Plan and widening it would not change the designation. She was aware of two times when there was serious flooding in that area. She opposed anything above medium density. o Commissioner Bergmann thought the proposal was excellent, however, was concerned because they did not meet all the locational criteria. o President Moen pointed out that whatever they zoned the property it would be subject to the Sensitive Lands process. He was concerned whether a pocket of Medium High Density would be appropriate and felt the issue of the street was important. Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to forward CPA 13-65 and ZC 15-85 to City Council with a recommendation of denial. Motion carried by majority vote Commissioner Bergmann and Peterson voting no. 6. Other Business 0 Discussion regarding the transportation resolution that the Planning Commission has requested be mailed out. _ o Discussion of Item 5.1, appointment to NPO # 3. Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to postpone until the applicant could appear before the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously by Cnmaissioner present. 7. Adjournment 10:05 P.M. Diane M. Jelderks, Secretary ATTEST: is Y ; A Donald Mosn, President 1974P t ss�.. PLANNING MISSION MINUTES October 8; 1905 Pkge 5 ~ STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM V' OCTOBER 8, 1985 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive plan amendment (CPA 13-85) and Zone Change (ZC 15-85) REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Amendment form Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and a Zone Change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: APPLICANT: Rosebud Enterprises Inc. OWNER: US Credit Loan Services 4209 SW Westdale Drive P.O. Box 4412 T-8 Portland, Oregon 97221 Portland, OR 97208 LOCATION: 10485 SW North Dakota Street (WCTM ISI 340A, T.L. 100) 2. Sac round On February 26, 1979, the City Council adopted the. NPO #i7 Plan by Ordinance 79-11 which designated the property Urban Low Density. This designation was modified on May 9, 1983• wh4fiC the Council adopted Ordinance 83-24 which applied the Medium Density Residential k classification to the property. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 6-83) fro Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential and a Zone Change (ZC 7-83) from A-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to A-20 (Residential, 20 units/acre) was proposed in 1983. The request was withdrawn prior to action being taken by the City Council. 3. Vicinity Information Properties to the north and east on the opposite side of Fanno Creek are zoned 2-P (Industrial Park) and are partially developed. The property timnadiately, to the west remains under Washington County jurisdiction and it is -diveloped with duplexes. Windsor Place subdivision (formerly Rosebud subdivision) which is zoned R-7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units/acre, planned devotooent) 'It, located to the ngtrthawst. A small acreage homesite zonad:R�-Z2 i8:.*n the south side of North Dakota Street. a_ STAFF REPORT-- CPA 13-85 C ZC 15-85 - PAGE 1 f ti The subject property and the parcel to the south are identified in the Comprehensive Plan as being within a Developing Area. The subject property as well as the residential parcels to the west and the { industrial properties to the north and east are considered to be Established Areas. 4. Site Information The property is presently undeveloped. The parcel contains 6.38 acres and approximately 2.35 acres situated in the southwestern portion of the property is above the 100 year flood plain of Fanno Creek. The applicant proposes to rezone the parcel to R-25 which is turn would allow for the construction of additional dwelling units over what is possible under the R-12 zone. Approximately 40 units would be allowed with the present zone and about 84 units are possible under an R-25 designation. This request is essentially the same as the 1983 proposal mentioned above. 5. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has no objection to the proposal but it is noted that development of the property will probably require a Sensitive Lands Permit. Also, half street improvements will be necessary along the North Dakota Street frontage. The Building Inspection Division, Washington County Fire District No. 1, and School District 233 have no objection to the request. c" NPO M7 is opposed to the application because the rezoning would allow residential densities that are not consistent with the surrounding area. Also, it is felt that the accepted flood plain elevation of 162 feet is too low and practical experience indicates that this flood level is over 162 feet. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.5.3.3.5.4, 6.1'.1, 6.3.2, 6.6.1. 7.1.2, 7.6.1. 8.1.3, 8.2.2, 12.1.1, and the Locational Criteria relating to Medium High Density Residential Development. Since the Tigard Comprehensive Plan has recently been ackowledged by L.C.D.C., it is no longer necessary to address the Statewide Planning Goals. The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is only partially consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted below: 1. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. 2. Policies 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and 7.2.1 relate to protection of the flood plain. These policies are more appropriately addressed in conjunction with a specific land development proposal, but it appears that a portion of the parcel can be developed in a manner consistent with City policy. STAFF REPORT -- CPA 13-85 6 ZC 15-85 - PAGE 2 3. Policies 3.5.3 and 3.5.4 can be satisfied as a condition of development approval. The dedication of the 100 year flood plain as greenway and the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle path will be required at that time. 4. Policy 6.1.1 is satisfied because the proposal will not have a significant impact upon the diversity of housing types available in Tigard. The R-25 zone allows for a higher residential density but also permits the same lower density uses, such as single-family residential, as the R-12 zone. 5. Policies 6.3.2 and 6.6.1 can be better addressed at the time of development however, it appears that satisfactory compliance with denfity transition and buffering requirements can be met. 6. Policies 7.1.2, 7.6.1 and 8.1.3 are satisfied because adequate service capacity for public water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and fire protection exist. Specific arrangements to utilize these facilities can be made when the property develops. 7. Policy 8.2.2 is satisfied because the property is within one quarter mile of the Tri-Flet bus service on Greenburg Road as prescribed by the Locational Criteriai for Medium High Density Residential Development. 8. Policy 12.1.1 is met because the applicable Plan policies, Locational Criteria and Community Development Code provisions have been applied. t 9. The proposal is not consistent with all of the relevant Locational Criteria as noted below: a. The property is not committed to Low Density Residential development and therefore is eligible for- a higher density designation. b. It appears that the subsequent development of the property could be adequately buffered from the residential uses to the west. C. North Dakota Street is a minor collector and therefore, the criteria requiring direct access to major collector or arterial street is not met. d. Much of the property has limited development potential because of the 100 year flood plain but the remaining 2.39 acre area is suitable for residential use. e. Adequate public facilities (except for streets as noted above) are available. f. The property is within one quarter mile of Greenburg Road which has scheduled bus service provided by Tri-Het. STAFF REPORT.- CPA 13-85 6 ZC 15--85 - PAGE 3 1 11 11 11 it i g. The convenience stores located at Greenburg Road and Shady Lane are over one quarter mile (.35 mile) from the ----*tern �- edge of the subject property and therefore the distance standard to a commercial center has not been met. h. The property includes a segment of the Fanno Creek flood plain which will be dedicated as part of the open space system as a condition of development. In summary, the proposal complies with the majority of Comprehensive Plan policies. The two 'shortcomings of the application relate to the lack of direct access to a major collector or arterial street and the distance to commercial services. The purpose of these two standards, as well as the other criteria relating to service availability, is to locate higher density residential development as close to essential services as possible. When these policies are implemented, higher density residential uses will tend to be clustered together near commercial centers rather than being interspersed within areas of lower density development. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the above findings and conclusions, the Planning Staff recommends denial of CPA 13-85 and ZC 15-85. 9001 W1.0100410114 ` / PREPA ED BY: Keith Liden APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Senior Planner Director of Planning 6 Development (KSL:br/1952) STAFF REPORT - CPA 13-85 6 ZC 15-85 PAGE JOB MM_ WASH ING TUN r SQU A RE r. � (' 0 'l em 6-151= 15-9$ ,. — ._-. .. .. - C—G� 26 70 VAqA all- t rt.r ea s�s�'�`s'" ' : ,� � ♦ems _: _ __ 000 R— • ~ T1.. LF. f �_+...r....i h ,�' •; 3 *4ju� 'tgo sole g® a an —4J 1 _ V(P® .� R`—i2 JR me ipar ,• «..•� - 120 i 0 I R-12 all rs.. ..' ...- s= .. •b �� w, FOWLER 3 •tl it f !T tV \ 2 R 41 •'• JR, HIGH ,.�,A SCHOOL tOOL 'awl w r a �t v ��k w +.an �ice.-�' h '}�.♦h �� g* '..�'.t{3 4r�" � f;+' �L'F� ��•�-n' _.1 �7 'Y�9 _ {f . August 23, 1985 This application is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density to Mediur!-High Density and a Zone Change from R-12 (Multiple Family Residential) to R-25 (Multiple Family Residential) on a 6. 38 acre land parcel adjacent to S. W. North Dakota Street. Present zoning on the site would theoretically allow 76. 5 multifamily units. However, almost two-thirds of the site is within the Fanno Creek 100-year flood plain, where no development is allowed. The buildable area of the site (2.35 acres) plus a 25% density transfer allowance granted under the Tigard Comprehensive Plan for the area within the flood plain (4.03 acres) would actually allow about 40 units on this site under the present R-12 zning. The requested zone change to R-25 would theoretically allow 84 units, which is only 7. 5 units more than would be allowed under the present R-12 zoning, if none of the site were in the 100-year flood plain. We are not necessarily suggesting that an 84 unit multifamily project is appropriate for this site. In fact, included with this application is a suggested site development plan showing how 64 �. housing units could be developed comfortably on the 2. 35 acres above the flood plain. This example plan demonstrates how building areas, park1mg and open space allocations may be treated for this parcel. The 64 units would create an overall density of 10 units to the acre, substantially less than the 12 units per acre allowed under the present R-12 zoning. Because of this configuration of the units, 8.7% of the total site is covered by buildings, 13% by parking and carports and the remaining 78. 3% of the site is open space, recreation and walks. We think this is an excellent relationship and demonstrates that developments concentrating units within a relatively small area of a larger site can be done logically and can be aesthetically pleasing. This is an ideal site for medium-high density housing because of the large amount of greenway adjacent to, and included within, the site. It is located near major highway collectors and is less than 3/4 miles from Washington Square. Neighborhood shopping is 0.35 miles from the site. Public transportation is available less than 1/4 mile away on Greenburg Road. The site is, itself, buffered from existing single-family housing to the west by a duplex development. Land to the north is largely 1n the 100-year flood plain and will act as a permanent buffer. Fanno Creek is the eastern boundary of this site. The creek and the flood plain in that direction provide a buffer from the Southern Pacific Railroad and industrial property further to the east. To the southeast, across the street from the site, is an Industrial park with five businesses involved in heavy equipment, metal tank construction, metal Fabrication and other heavy metal handling operations. Land directly to the south is underdeveloped , single family housing designated Medium Density Residential and zoned R-12. The buildable portion of this site is almost like an island. It is buffered from more intensive uses by Fanno Creek and the greenxay. The entire site, in turn, acts as a buffer between those more intensive uses and the single family housing to the west. Multifamily projects are traditionally used as buffers between lower density housing and other more intensive uses, such as commercial and industrial. This project would be no exception, as It would provide such a buffer. One intent of the City Plan is to maintain available housing on sites that are appropriate for higher density housing. Where opportunities exist to logically maintain the higher density housing, which is appropriate, accessible, and will provide amenities for the people who occupy these housing developments, the zoning processes should be used to accommodate these opportunities. Nearly 93% of the Tri-County vacant residential land is zoned for single-family housing with lots greater than 1200 square feet. The Tri-County area has only 7.2% of vacant land zoned for multifamily. If all of the multifamily zoned land is built to the maximum capacity of its designation (including additional density given as credit for flood plains, greenways, street dedication, etc. ) this will accommodate only 47% of the projected multifamily needs to the year 2000 according to VACANT LAND STUDY, 1978 by 1000 Friends of Oregon. An application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from R-12 to R-20 was submitted by the previous owners of this property in 1983. It received a favorable recommendation from the Planning Staff and a recommendation for approval from the Planning Commission to the City Council. Council initially approved the application, then remanded it back to allow for input by NPO #7. which had claimed insufficient notification. The application was subsequently withdrawn by the property owners, due to their financial difficulties. August 23, 1985 The following information is submitted in response to the Locational Criteria for Medium-High Density Residential contained In Chapter 12 of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Volume 2. (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. This property is currently zoned R-12 and has been previously designated for Medium Density Residential. It is not an area which is committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. This site is suitable for higher density housing because of the Ideal buffering available here. The flood plain and floodway along Fanno Creek in the northerly and easterly portions of the site are designated as greenway and set aside for public use, parks, bicycle pathways, etc. Fanno Creek, the east boundary of this site, is the division line from the Industrial Park area to the east. Multifamily housing traditionally is used as a buffer between industrial, office uses ( and low density housing. To the west, a duplex housing development already exists. Property to the south is zoned to accommodate medium density housing, and across the street to the southeast is an existing heavy industrial park. Even in terms of traffic flow the site is ideally situated to allow anticipated traffic to be generated away from the existing single family housing on the west, and toward Greenburg Road on the east. (3) Areas which have direct access from a mayor collector or arterial street. The primary servicing street is S. W. North Dakota Street, which has immediate access to S. W. Greenburg Road and is within close proximity to the 219 Highway system. Southwest North Dakota Street is designated as a collector street. Its primary access to Greenburg Road, 0.15 miles away, does not pass through a residential area. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. The subject site has an average slope of 5%. The majority of the site is open. Some trees are located in a concentrated central n area above the flood plain, others along Fanno Creek. August 23, 1985 The flood plain, which is an unbuildable area, does offer unique natural features which will provide an asset to this development. A great amount of open space is available to the prosect. Bicycle paths and greenway will be available to all occupants. The flood plain, while providing a limitation on where buildings may be located, is an asset in providing open space and buffering for the prosect. Since no building is allowed in the flood plain, densities in other areas can be increased by changing the zoning while still maintaining medium overall density and preserving vegetation, wildlife and the scenic areas within the greenway. (5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. The subject site is adjacent to a 12" water main in S. W. North Da- kota Street which the Tigard Water District has stated has the capacity to service the site. Sanitary sewer service from the Fanno Creek interceptor runs through the property. The Tualatin Rural Fire District had reviewed a previous application for fire protection services and did not oppose the increased density for this site. Southwest North Dakota Street will be improved to City standards along the subject site as part of its development. Police services, parks, library and general administrative services are available to the area. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. The site is located about 0.15 miles from S. W. Greenburg Road, which currently is serviced by Tri-Met. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. This site is located adjacent to property designated for industrial park development. Within that zoning designation, professional offices, general offices and industrial uses are allowed. This area Is not This project,� eed therefore,o capacity and more scontemplated.are Is one-quarter mile ofbus� business and office centers. (U) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. The site is adjacent to and, in fact, includes part of the Tigard/Fanno Creek Greenway System. Architects Van lom A.LA 34 N.W. First St.Suite 309 Portland,OR 97209 503/226-0540 �r October 28, 1935 City Council City of Tigard 127SS S.W. Ash Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear City Council, a Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. is concerned that Richard Boberg, Chairman of N.P.O. #7 made a presentation at the Manning Commission which implied that the` N.P.b, had opposed this application. The September 18th meeting at which Rosebud Enterprises was to discuss the application with the N.P.O. was cancelled. Since this project was not rescheduled with the N.P.O. we are of the opinion that the vote was never taken in a regularly scheduled meeting. ;r Boberg's objective as chairman is to represent the N.P.O. , not impose his personal judgement, unless he is- representing the group he is out of order and should only be allowed to speak as an individual. Yours eery truly, AR'CIICTS V. N LO`% A.I.!1. , P.C. septi` M. Van Lom, A.I.A. u* A ec c = " JIIVL/amp a2 ------------ li rx; to Ager d 0F8 EPA Io C, EVC ME (a3- a L Lrcdilcorp) PL�n =111111111eiTilifIll.Ti111it1i 1'iT fi01IIt7I 1 g 1 lI1 1.1� I 1 1 11 ff[Tf ffrfmr 1 P! r I fri'1J 1 �Il 11 I l I'1frilfli�ilfpffIlli)1111111[111-IJ-1 � eNOTE: IF Am THIS MICROFILMED ...,_I 2 3 4 _- _ $ - 6 7 - DRAMING IS LESS CLEAR THAN � S 9 O Ii E2 THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE i THE WI QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL 1111 __ ^r--=- - ----- _ - - 06 6Z BZ LZ 9Z SZ - OZ £Z ZZ IZ OZ 61 91 (I 91 sr b1 EI 'zi 11 - 01 6 9b _£__ Z DRAM INA d11rIUil,Illii,1111�,iriN�I ,N�R,� 7 �. MARC -I !F _ s, ---- x.9190 ti 1 9 C Ni A. ? 1 FT ULL da s 1 1 1 1 I � r t 3 n 7 � 1T. , r � r -- --- J8yy 11 pa^+c,n� I rI i � o I . fI ---------- ---- 7.1 11 A° Architects �w i SUGGESTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAID Van Lom A.IA., P.C. m ti p ; 10495 S.W. NORTH DAKOTA STREET '' r-- 34N.W,Rrst5t.5uite309 tC5 RM!ontl.Ol gm97209 rIl'Cey TIGARD,OREGON 503/226-0590 �upnpnlnq'nnuplgln(nrpupl,Nu�nrpnpnlnl(mlmpnpn(Iningn9n�plglnpl9n'�'I'tlnplgn'(nlpnpnnn�Innl plgnl,ngllqnq�npnpPlnyul —' _--- - _.__._�_.__. ort:,r,x+s rlloa o 2 3 4 6 B '/ B p 9 ,I 12I mmkAlF oTMx.Vm wii¢.+n rem mW70 VW nc worn or rrt xu � � °R�°`' ei sz'Li ':�-.. __.._—y---.. yi- sl' �r cl al it BI'• L I� 12 LL R 1a CZ 22 IS 02-61-�LI 11 C . L t rx�IxAml W111 MARCH 7 'I,1990 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 10-28-85 AGENDA ITEM fit: DATE SUBMITTED: 10-23-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: CPA 3-85 and ZC 3-85 S S J Properties PREPARED BY: Keith Liden P"�w REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY This application is to be heard by the Council following the remand from LUBA. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve and adopt findings prepared by staff. 2. Deny and adopt findings with the assistance of staff. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternative 1. 2027PIdmj CPA 3-85 ZC 3-85 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council October 23, 1985 FROM: Keith Liden SUBJECT: Portland Fixture/S & J Properties CPA 3-85/ZC 3-85 Summary Following a remand from LUBA regarding the City Council denial of CPA 3-85/ZC 3-85, the Council held a hearing to determine how a second review of the application would be conducted. A hearing before the Council was set for October 28, 1985. The Council also indicated that the following items would be considered as relevant evaluation criteria: 1. ftwtewide Planning Goals and Guidelines 2. Tigard Comprehensive Plan a. Policies 2.1 1. , 5.1.1. , 5.1.4, 8.1.3, and 12.2.1 a. b. Locational Criteria, Section 12.1 pertaining to General Commercial and Commercial Professional. 3. Tigard Community Development Code a. 18.22.020 Purpose (Amendments to the Code and Map) b. 18.22.040 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Standards for Making the Decision. C. 18.30.120 Standards for the Decision d. 18.62.010 Purpose (C-G Zone) e. 18.64.010 Purpose (C-P Zone) A revised set of findings has been prepared by the applicant which addresses all of the criteria noted above. The staff has assembled a packet of information for the Council's review of this issue. The following items are included: 1. Staff report. 2. Applicant's supplemental statement addressing the criteria noted above prepared by Cogan, Sharpe, Cogan on October 16, 1985. 3. City Council minutes relating to this item after it was remanded from LUBA (September 9th and 16th, 1985). 4. Final order denying CPA 3-85/ZC 3-85 (Resolution No. 85-28). CPA 3-85 ZC 3-85 Page 1 5. Council minutes for the decision for denial (April 22, 1985). 6. Planning Commission minutes recommending approval (April 2, 1985). 7. Staff report presented to Planning Commission (April 2, 1985) . S. Traffic engineer's report prepared by Tom Lancaster. 9. Applicant's statement prepared by Greenhill Associates on February 14, 1985. Supplemental Staff Analysis The original staff report addressed the relevant Statewide Planning Goals and Plan Policies 2.1.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.4, 8.1.3, and the Locational Criteria in Section 12.1 that pertain to General Commercial Plan and Zone designations. The staff has reviewed the comments made in the April 2, 1985, report and we conclude that the findings are appropriate. The criteria which were not addressed in the original report are discussed below: Policy 12.2.1 The determination of a trade area for a commercial activity requires a considerable amount of research and analysis that the staff is not in a position to provide. The locational Criteria for both General Commercial and Commercial Professional indicate that trade area, site size, and gross leasable area will vary depending upon the nature of the development. It appears that either a C-P or C-G zoning designation would be consistent with part a. of this policy. Parts b. and c. of this policy have been met because the appropriate Plan policies and Locational Criteria have been applied. Locational Criteria --- Comparison between General Commercial and Commercial Professional The criteria which apply in both cases are identical except for several additional items that apply only to properties being considered for a General Commercial designation. In addition to the common criteria, a General Commercial property must have direct access to a major collector or arterial street, availability of public transit, and a project with a scale that is compatible with surrounding uses. As noted in the original staff report, the staff concluded that all of the applicable Locational Criteria have been satisfied. Tigard Community Development Code A. Section 18.22.020 relates to legislative amendments and since the proposal is a quasi-judicial amendment, this section is not relevant. b. Section 18.22.040 gives general guidance regarding the items to be considered when reviewing a quasi-judicial change. The staff concludes that this section of the Code has been met because the applicable Plan policies, Code provisions, and Statewide Planning Goals have been applied. CPA 3-85 ZC 3-85 Page 2 This section also indicates that a "evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the Comprehensive Plan or zoning map. . ." should be apparent. One change in the neighborhood has been the significant increase in the number of approved residential lots and dwelling units in the northeastern section of the City and the south portion of Beaverton. The second significant change in circumstances relates to the extension of North Dakota Street to the Sorrento Road/Scholls Ferry road intersection. These two factors have increased the potential demand for retail and other commercial services in the area and creation of a four-way intersection at the northwestern corner of the property has enhanced the accessibility of the site. C. Section 18.30.120 as well as Chapter 18.130 of the Code deals only with legislative changes to the Plan, Code, or map. d. Section 18.62.010 and 18.64.010 are the purpose statements for the C-G and C-P zones. These purpose statements are not intended to be utilized as evaluation criteria but are meant to describe the types of activities permitted in the two zones. The Planning staff concludes that the information and findings contained in the applicant's submittals and the staff reports address all relevant Statewide Planning Goals, Plan policies, and Code provisions. Since the review was initiated, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan was acknowledged, the State Goals no longer have to be addressed. 2027P dmj CPA 3-85 `C 3-85 Page 3 COGAN SHARPE COGAN M E M O R A N D U M TO: William Monahan, Planning Director City of Tigard FROM: Sumner Sharpe Cogan Sharpe Cogan DATE: October 16, 1985 SUBJECT: Supplemental Statement for CPA 3-85 j ZC 3-85 Our firm has been retained to prepare a supplemental statement (. for the Portland Fixture/S&J property appeal for the October 28, 1985, City Council hearing. In this statement , I will refer to your September 27th memo to Mr. Jack Orchard which identifies the relevant criteria to be addressed by the applicant. 1. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES The Tigard plan has been acknowledged, and this request is for a quasi-judicial change to the comprehensive plan and development code maps. It is our opinion that the statewide planning goals and guidelines generally do not apply. These would apply if the request were for a policy or code text change or a legislative action to modify the plan. The property is already designated for commercial uses, and this has been accounted for in the plan and code. This request is to allow for a minor change in the land use designation CP to CG, which could result in a different mix of land uses. However, the location of the property is such that the criteria for both CG and CP uses are satisfied and supportable in the existing plan and code. 71 SW OAK PORTLAND OREGON 97204 503/225-0192 2. TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN a. 2.1.1 Citizen Involvement Program. This is a city responsibility and does not apply to the applicant, and there is a finding on the record that this policy has been satisfied. b. 5.1.1 Diversification of Economic Opportunities. The change from CP to CG would accomplish the following: - The potential for a faster build out of -.ne property, thus creating jobs faster than if the property remained CP, as a more diverse mix of uses is permitted in CG zones. - A more advantageous structural configuration. Professional services can locate in structures designed for low-rise commercial developments; however , it is often too costly to convert _ structures designed for office uses to commer- cial purposes. Furthermore r commercial type y . construction results in lower square foot coats to the lessees. Consequently, CG type developments offer more flexibility as market conditions change. More diversity in uses and activities to serve the area. A survey of existing development along Scholls Ferry Road from the area in question , east to 217 shows that because of the inclusive nature of zoning, business and professional offices have already located in g: both commercial and industrial zones. Consequently, much of the demand for profes- sional services is already being addressed. In addition, some retail uses are found in industrial zones. This has been the case on both the Tigard and Beaverton sides of Scholls Ferry Road. Tigard (south) side of Scholls Ferry west to east In the adjacent CG zone (Greenway Shopping Center) a the following CP permitted uses can be found: pet shop and grooming, { .. animal clinic, and post office. b ^, -2- amu... In the IP zone, just west of the Southern Pacific railroad tracks, the Koll Business Center has more than 50 tenants, mostly offices, and includes several restaurants, a travel agency, business systems companies, health care offices, and a design firm. In the CG zone just east of the Southern Pacific railroad tracks, none of the uses currently in the Times Publications Building could be classed as retail: tenants include a career management counselor, an insurance office, and a diet center. Beaverton (north) side of Scholls Perry west to east North of the Greenway Shopping Center, in an R5 zone, there is a day care center. The Parkside Center, zoned CS (commercial service) includes a medical emergency center and a dental care center. The Robinson Crossing Center, located within a CI (campus industrial) zone, is primarily retail uses, but includes an eye care center. The Nimbus industrial park, zoned CI, includes, or will includer office uses, a health club, a conference center, and a large pharmacy service. The point of this quick review is to show that, in situations where zoning is inclusive of other uses, as is the case with Tigard's CG and CP zones, the market becomes a major determinant of specific uses as opposed to zoning designations. It is our opinion that, given the degree to which business and professional services already are located in commercial and industrial zones g not designated primarily for professional services, the 5.4 acre site in question here cannot be expected to develop exclusively for professional and business offices. As market conditions dictate, professional services locate where appropriate and as allowed by the underlying zones. �+ _ -3- Furthermore, up to 30% of Tigard's CP sites can be developed with certain CG permitted uses. Therefore, the difference between CG and CP may be more a matter of perception than reality, but the CP designation inhibits development given the existence of other office development in the vicinity. Finally, with regard to the timing of development and job creation, a CG zone which allows a broader array of commercial services as permitted uses allows for a more flexible development and marketing response to the marketplace. C. 5.1 .4 Non-Encroachment The area is already designated as commercial, and no expansion of the zone is requested. Therefore, this policy does not apply. d. 8. 1.3 Development Preconditions It is understood that these preconditions are acceptable to the applicant. With reference to 8.1.3.e, the traffic engineer for the applicant has identified that a minor change in the signal system is possible to accommodate the differences in peak hour traffic that may be generated from CG uses as opposed to CP uses. Given the flexibility provided by both zones in terms of allowable uses and the mixed use nature of the development pattern in the Scholls Ferry Road area, it is not possible to be definitive about the exact character of traffic in the area. For example, office uses in C and I zones create less peak hour traffic and may not have been accounted for in traffic forecasts. Finally, the Tigard comprehensive plan did not identify the level of street improvements that has resulted in the North Dakota extension which connects 121st Avenue to Scholls Ferry Road and creates a major four-way intersection with S. W. Sorrento Road at Scholls Ferry Road. This change of circumstance results in a modified traffic pattern; and as Sorrento improves, North Dakota provides a more direct connection to 121st as opposed to using Scholls Ferry for a Sorrento/121st connection. -4- Scholls Ferry is a state highway, and a major four-way signal at the North Dakota/Sorrento intersection is planned. Modification to the signal to reduce congestion due to any traffic increases due to CG type uses as opposed to CP type uses is achieved easily as outlined in the traffic engineer's report. e. 12.2.1a Appropriate Commercial Develo� pment The CG zone allows all CP type uses. The "scale" criteria for CG and CP zones are virtually identical; trade area, site size and leaseable area are varied, presumably based on market conditions. f. 12.2.1 Locational Criteria All locational criteria for CG are addressed by the proposed change. With the decision to have the North Dakota extension serve as a major connection between 121st and Scholls Ferry Road, the site is served by major roads on two sides. This improvement and the proposed traffic signals make it possible to accommodate CP or CG traffic; and if added traffic results, signal modifications are possible to mitigate any impacts. 3. TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE a. 18.22.020 Legislative Amendments This section does not apply; this is a quasi- judicial amendment. b. 18.22.040 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Standards F A request for a comprehensive plan map change is submitted concurrently with the zoning map amendment. As has been shorn, there is no adverse effect on health, safety and welfare. The only possible impact is a potential increase in traffic generation, which is not adverse for three reasons: it -5- Man r 1. The North Dakota extension was not part of the city's comprehensive plan when the site was designated CP, and therefore the current capacity of the interchange easily exceeds that projected by the plan. This is a change in the traffic pattern not foreseen at the time of plan adoption. 2. The mixed use development along Scholls Ferry Road suggests that traffic generation character- istics are not related solely to underlying zoning; i.e. , there are no developments with one type of use in C or I zones. 3 . If the development on this site is primarily retail versus business/professional services, then additional traffic generation can be anticipated; however, given the plans for a four-way signal at the intersection, a slight modification in the signal will mitigate the additional traffic and maintain "C" level traffic flow standards. c. 18.30.120 Standards for the Decisions All standards have been addressed including the change of circumstances related to the North Dakota Extension. d. 18.62.010 CG: Purpose Professional services are allowed as outright uses in CG zones; thus that potential is maintained by this change. it is located on a major arterial. e. 18.64.010 CP: Purpose The change allows for business/professional services. The CP zone across North Dakota from the site in question maintains the transitional use of CP. The residential zone south of the site in question already abuts an existing CG zone, therefore an expansion of the CG zone does not dramatically change the nature of zoning relationships. r Opportunities to create business and professional services to serve the nearby residential neighbor- hoods are preserved, and the possibility of more rapid development due to enhanced development and marketing flexibility will support the city' s economic growth. The uses will be compatible and supporti.e, as business and professional services are allowed under both CG and CP zones. Finally, under the terms of current CP zoning , there are no guarantees that primarily business and professional offices would locate here; for example, a permitted motel/restaurant (transient lodging) could utilize the entire site. CONCLUSION This change will have little, if any, impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. - Business and professional services are permitted in CG zones, and these uses can be sited more cost effectively in commercial type structures than can retail type uses in structures designed for offices. - It already exists as a commercial zone on the plan and zoning maps. - If additional traffic is generated, it is easily mitigated as a condition of development. The development of North Dakota as a connection between 121st and Scholls Ferry is a change of circumstance not identified in the city's plan. Given this improvement, the traffic impact differential between CP and CG is minimal. - Development along Scholls Ferry Road is diverse in nature -- business and professional offices exist in CG/CS and industrial zones, and retail uses exist in industrial zones. Consequently, it is questionable to assume that a CP site would be developed entirely as business and professional services or that a more flexible CG zone would not include business and professional services. In our estimation, development of existing business and professional services in the vicinity has weakened the market for development of a substantial amount of new business and professional services. By allowing the change to a CG zone, more flexibility in structural type and a faster construction schedule is encouraged, more diverse economic activity is promoted, and the creation of jobs is likely to begin sooner. -7- AMMURM C. Committee members advised Council that focusing on the Downtown area has given the Committee more structure and is creating a more cohesive atmosphere on the Committee. There was concern that more work needs to be done to strengthen the ties with other Economic Development committees in the surrounding area. d. Co cil expressed their appreciation for the Committee's efforts and ' e to date and encouraged them to appear before the Budget Committ with any requests for funding which should be considere . Council further supported focusing on 1 or 2 major goals and i ' ated Downtown Tigard is especially appropriate. e. City Administrato stated the last legislative session set new changes in the Loca Improvement District laws which will impact economic development h in the public and private sector. He suggested this information ould be provided the Committee. f. Community Development Director tated that the Council will see members of the Committee appeari to testify at public hearings in the future. They are encou ing developers to present development requests to them for comme CIVIC CENTER DISCUSSION 5 UPDATE a. City Administrator distributed revised Project dget Report and stated the October report should be more detailed ter the soils dispute is resolved. He advised Council that the ivic Center Advisory Committee is meeting regularly again. b. Carolyn Eadon, Civic Center Advisory Committee represent ive, stated that the Committee members are going to be viewing the s e more often. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 3-85 AND ZONE CHANGE 7_C 3-85 PORTLAND FIXTURE/S & J BUILDERS NPA N7 Review on the record of the City Council's denial on April 22, 1985, of a request for a0proval for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from CP (Commercial Professional) to CG (Commercial General) for a 5.4 acre site. Located: South side of Scholls Ferry Road. immediately west of Greenway Towne Center, WCTM ISI 348C, Lot 400). a. Public Testimony portion of hearing was concluded at the 9/9/85 meeting and consideration of Council was continued to this date. b. Legal Counsel stated Council needed to identify those sections of the code which are relevant to their decision. He suggested that if sections of the Code and Comprehensive Plan were considered in the formation of a decision which were not addressed at the previous hearings, then the participants need to have a chance to respond in a Public Hearing either before Council or Planning Commission. C. Council noted the following areas of the Code which should be f,. addressed in a }public hearing: e 2 COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 1985 ffwwwffw� M= 18.64.010 - purposes of the CP zoning not addressed. 18.64.010 S 18.62.010 - definition of both zones not addressed. Comp. Plan Section II, pages 79-86 Policy 12.2.1 18.30.120 - Criteria for Council approval 18.22.010 18.22.040 Beaverton Zone/Camp Plan Maps All LCDC Goals d. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Brian to set full evidential public hearing before Council on 10/14/85 at 7:00 PM to hear issue. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. e. Jack Orchards, representing applicant, asked who would determine what items are to be addressed at the new hearing. f. After lengthy discussion, consensus of Council was that the Community Development Director would advise applicant of sections outlined by Counril as areas of concern, however, that listing would not be all inclusive. j g. After further discussion, Councilor Edin moved to reschedule the hearing date from 10/14/85 to 10/28/85 at 7:00 PM to give applicant further time to prepare presentation. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCILOR EDWARDS ARRIVED: 8:10 PM 8. ANNEXATION PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT Tabled from 9/4/85 Meeting a. Consensus of Council was to continue this item to 9/30/85 meeting. 9. CITY QUES ONNAIRES DISCUSSION a. Consensu f Council was to continue this item to 9/23/85 meeting. 10. CABLE TV RENEGOTIATI REPORT a. Councilor Scott dis 'buted a summary of the agreement reached between MACC and Store etro Communications, Inc. She requested input from Council regards their concerns as she was scheduled to attend another meeting with ACC on 9/16/85 at 4:00 PM. b. Legal Counsel state that he would studying the agreement with the Legal Counsel from MACC (Mr. 0 Cooper) and would also respond to any concerns Council might expr s. l Page 3 -COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 16, 1985 Senior Planner- noted history of request. ino noted that Staff, �^ Planning Commission and CCT have differences of opinion •.,n some ommendations. c. Public stimony: Gerald Crow, ow Engineering, requested Council approve staff's recommendation t allow gravel parking areas for special areas, i.e. temporary uses. d. Staff requested direction m Council. Q. Public Hearing Closed f. ORDINANCE NO. 85-31 AN ORDINANCE AM ING SECTIONS 18.56.050 AND 18.58.050 OF TIIE!COMMUNITY DEVELOPME CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY (ZOA 4-85) g. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Council Ed in to adopt setting minimum setback requirements. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. present. h. Council discussed other proposed changes with staff and ve direction for preparation of ordinances for the 9/23/85 meeting. (6) PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A"irNDMENT CPA 3-85 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 3-85 PORTLAND FIXTURE/S & J BUILDERS NPO # 7 Review on the record of the City Council's denial on April 22, 1985, of a request for approval for a Comprehensive Pian Amendment and Zone Change from CP (Commercial Professional) to CG (Commercial General) for a 5.4 acre site. Located: South side of Scholls Ferry Road, immediately west of Greenway Towne Center, (WCTM 1S1 348C, lot 400) . a. Public Hearing Opened b. Legal Counsel noted that Portland Fixture Company, S & J Builders, have petitioned LUBA for review of the Council decision of April 22, 1985 which denied a comprehensive plan amendment and zone change. The Council needs to review the application based upon the prior record and the testimony given on the record at this new hearing. A decision should be made based upon the criteria established in the comprehensive plan. He recommended a tentative finding be made with direction to staff for preparation of the adoption papers to adopt findings and conclusions. COUNCILOR BRIAN ARRIVED: 7:54 P.M. C. Public Testimony: Appellants o Jack Orchard, 1100 One Main Place, Portland, stated that Council needs to address 7 criteria in making a decision and had only addressed 5 at the original hearing. He noted that State Wide Planning Goal #12 and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria, must be addressed. Page 2 COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 He requested traffic engineer i.nformatiori be corisidered regarding the impact of the traffic from the proposed site. o Tom Lancaster, Traffic Engineer , posted a map of the proposed intersection at Scholls Ferry/S'orronto/Dakota and distributed a synopsis of the traffic study report for Greenway Town Center Phase II. He reported that congestion and safety would not be significantly impacted if the proposed signal would provide a special signal phase for the northbound right turn traffic. This modification of the signal would be about $1,000. o Mr. Orchard noted that the developers would bear the entire expense of the modification to the signal. d. Senior Planner Liden stated the Staff recommendation for approval stands as before based on a strict interpretation of the codes. LeS:.l Counsel noted that any decision may by Council would have to be based on the criteria set out in TT1C 18.22.040. Q. Public Hearing Closed f. Council Consideration o Councilor Brian stated that the pian design and long term community needs were addressed during the Comp Plan hearings to set the standards and that today's market should not be the issue considered. o Councilor Edwards agreed with Councilor Brian and added that there was concern that the traffic study does not address the true traffic impact to the area. o Councilor Edin stated that LCDC has logically required good plan designations and the burden of proof for the change is on the applicant. He wished to evaluate the comp plan further and requested this item be continued for 1 week for study. o Mayor Cook stated the NPO was present at the last hearing and they recommended denial of the request. Comp Plan hearings were held for over two years to make the designations originally and felt the intensity of the use would lead him to stay with the existing zoning. g. Discussion followed whether the Beaverton/Tigard zoning maps could be considered at the hearing for use in studying the issue for a week. h. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Scott to continue the Council Consideration of issue to 9/16/85 to allow Council additional time for consideration and detailed study. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. i. Mr. Orcharduestioned whether he would have q a change to address the new information of the surrounding zoning maps. He was concerned he might be precluded from any input. Page;3 COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 j . Legal. Counsel. stated everyone should have tho opportunity to address that issue. k. Mayor Cook stated that if that information were deemed necessary for consideration by Council that the issue could he remanded back to the Planning Commission for this to be introduced into the record. 7, MSTIP RESOLUTION & LETTER OF INTENT Mayor Cook read into the record the memorandum from the Transportation Committee setting forth their recommendations noting support of a bond measure with conditions. b. L thy discussion followed. C. RESOL ION NO. 85-75 A RESOLUTION OF T14L TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT G THE WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTE MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MSTIP) AND ECOMMENDING'SUBMITTAL TO THE VOTERS. d. Motion by Co cilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve. e. Tom Sullivan, Trans rtation Committee Chairman,, spoke to the bond measure as the best y to insure funds are available for all cities. f. Bruce Warner, Washington unty Deputy Director For Land Use and Transportation, stated that his would be a joint project and that a bond proposal would be the ay to get the full benefit for the jurisdictions projects. He no d that October 1st is the hearing before the Board of Commissione regarding the road jurisdiction issues for the City of Tigard. g. Motion to approve Resolution No. 8 75 was approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Coun 'lor Scott voting nay. h. Consensus of Council was to send the Res ution and a letter of intent setting out conditions of support as et out in the Tigard Transportation Committee's Memo and ask the unty to also commit to cities being allowed the option of ad 'nistering certain projects within their jurisdiction. 8. COUNCIL/STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP DISCUSSION a. After lengthy discussion on this issue, consensus of until was to hold a workshop in Tigard on October 12, 1985 from 00 AM to 4:00 PPI. This workshop will be for Council only, howe -r, the meeting is open to the public. Executive Staff will of be required to attend and will not be compensated for their ti a if they choose to attend. Each Councilor will submit items for the agenda to the Mayor by 9/16/85. Mayor Cook will then prepare n agenda for the meeting and will work with staff to publish a . ` call the meeting at the appropriate time. The professional trainer will not be used for the session and the location of the meeting is to be determined at a later date. Page 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 9, 1995 ' CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON RESOLUTION NO. LAN A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF E TTM8Y PPORTLAND FFORI TURE CO..EFILE VNo.PCPA AMENDMENT AND A ZONE CHANGE REQUESTED 3-85 AND ZC 3-85. DENYING THE APPLICATION REQUESTS. ENTERING FINDING AND FUSIONS. WHEREAS. the Tigard City Council heard the above application at its regular sooting of April 22, 1985. The applicants appeared and were represented by Hal Hewitt and Tom Lancaster; appearing in opposition was '70e Schweitz of NPO 07. WHEREAS, The Council finds the following FACTS in this matter: applicants for .this matter, Portland Fixture Co.. requested 1. The app Commercial Professional) to C-G a reclassification from C*-6' 9 acre site designated as (Commereial General) Far a 7. Washington County Tax Map 1S1 346C. Tax lot 400. The explanation supporting the request is found in File No. CPA 3-95- 2. The Council had before it the record of the proceedings before the Tigard Planning Commission which voted to app request. with three dissenting votes, on April 2, 1985. 3. The relevant approval criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, ltr mpreh nsive al Plan poria.es 2.1.1. and Cha12, S.I.I. 5.1.4. 8.1.3 Pte WHEREAS, based on the record in this case from the Planning 2Commission heariCouncil of April 2, 1985; and the City Council hearing oe April . 199S. thesakes the following FINDINGS in this matter; 1. Statewide Planning Goal #1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Involvement program including review of all development applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). In addition, all public notice requirements were met. Coad #1 is met because the City applied all 2. Statewide Planning GoalsCity Comprehensive Plan . applicable Statewide Planning oafseats to the application. Policies and i0evelopment Code require 3. Statewide Planning Goal y12 is not satisfied because the proposed will have a negative impact upon Scholls Ferry Road Increasing traffic. At the City Council rseeting on April' 22, the Council heard conflicting testimony concerning the amount of traffic which the property would generate developed under the present CrP:and the RESOLUTION.Fjo. 85-„4sa_ Page 1 ..s proposed C-G designations. The Council determined that the present traffic situation on Scholls Ferry Road would be more adversely affected with the addition of traffic from the property if built under the C-G zoning designation than under C-P. 4. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy .and saussatisfied because the Neighborhood Planning Organization property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's proposal. S. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.1.1 is met because the proposal will have a small positive effect upon the number of jobs available to Tigard residents. It is estimated that the subsequent commercial development will provide,betwean 150 and 200 jobs. Development under the C-G designation. however, could result in less higher paid skilled positions than under C-P. 6. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.1.4 is satisfied because the proposed change from C-P to C-G will not enlarge the area' presently designated for commercial use and will not encroach upon nearby residential areas. 7. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.1.3 will be satisfied • as a condition for development of the site. Before any commercial development .occurs. City approval through the Site Development Review process will be required. B. The applicable locational criteria are partially satisfied for the following reasons: a. A residential zoning district is only adjacent along the southern boundary of the site. b. The change of zoning would creme additional traffic congestion or related problems which cannot be remedied by the proposed traffic signal , at the Scholls Ferry/Sorrento/North Dakota intersection. Although traffic volume would also be increased it the property is developed under C-P, the number of types generated by the property when developed out to full capacity under C--G is greater. thus adding to the traffic volume of Scholls Ferry Road. C. Direct access to an arterial and collector street is available. d. Public transportation is available on Scholls Ferry Road. a. Because of its location and the Site Davelopment Review approval which is required prior to development, a compatible relationship with nearby properties can be maintained. RESOLUTIONNO. 85-, Page,2 9. The applicant's failed to persuade the City Council that the plan designation is improper. The plan was adopted in 1983 following substantial community input. No plan policies cited by the applicants convinced the Council that conditions in the area have substantially changed to compel a change to C-G. In addition, no convincing evidence of mistake or inconsistency was presented. 3 10. The applicants failed to address the long term community needs of the City, for Commercial Professional land uses. The Council interprets the Comprehensive Plan to be a long rang P lan created to provide for the many diverse and competing land uses and business which serve the public need. A reduction in the amount of land dedicated to commercial professional development in this section of Tigard would have a negative impact over the projected period of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1 The Council adopts the following CONCLUSION OF LAW 1. Basad on Finding No. 3, the Council has determined that the proposed change in zoning will result in development with the potential to greatly increase traffic over that which the existing zoning would generate. The increase traffic will ad even with have ave a detrimental impact upon Scholls Ferry completion of a new traffic signal. 2. Based on Finding No. 8, locational criteria have not all been met. The change of zoning would create additional traffic congestion and related problems. 3. eased on Finding No. 9, the Council finds that the applicant has not provided persuasive designations arguments and thenange reduce the the comprehamountensive of plan and zoning gnat ons available C—P zoned land in this section of the City. Section 2. The Council, therefore, ORDERS that the above referenced request be, and the same hereby is. DENIED. The Council FURTHER ORDERS that the Planning Director and the City Recorder send a copy of the Final Order as a Notice of Final decision to the parties in this case. PASSED: This Cnj�' day of „Maim_ 1985. ybr – City of Tigard ATTEST: �.. 602putyCity Recorder - City of Tigard (WAM:br/128OP) RESOLUTION NO. 85-.j21-0 .. Page 3, _ ori • Coun r Brian moved, Councilor Edwards seconded, to adapt Ordinance 85-1T. y APProved by 3-1 ity vote of Council present, Councilor Scott voting Nay. A second ing is required. 7• COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4- NPO pT ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-85 KRUEGER PUBLIC NEARING OPENED a• Councilor Brian moved, Councilor Edwards seconded, t Public Nearing to May 6, 1985. ntinue the Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 8• COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 3-85 ZONE CHANGE ZC 3-85 S 6 J BUILDERS NPO #7 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED a• Community Development Director gave a summary stating the Planning Commission recommended 6-3 approval of CPA 3-85 and ZC 3-85 from C-P (Commercial Professional) to C-G (Commercial General). NPO k7 opposed this recommendation 6-1. PUBLIC TESTIMONY a• John Schweitz, NPO q7, stated there was not enough time for the NPO to i-eview this issue. He felt it should go back to the Planning Commission. O Councilor Scott asked who's expense the traffic signal would be. Community Development Director thought it would be the responsibility of S 6 J Builders. Joe Schweitz stated the State j had planned in the future to put a traffic signal in but did not ; know off hand if it is their responsibility. ' stated there was a match requirement between S & j Administrator sa the City's System Development Ch and , arge• o Councilor Scott asked if the area would warrant a bike path and asked the NPO to look into this. o Councilor Brian had a concern on giving up the only parcel that is zoned C-P. b, Hal Hewitt, representing S t J Builders (owner Center) felt there were three issues: 1) Strip commercialy te alo n Scholls Ferry Road, 2) Availability 3) Traffic of Office Space, and situation, The Greenway Town Center has rented out most of the good location that face the street. locations will go into office spaces. This site The vacant appropriate location and does meet the• criteria according a Highly State and Local coda. rig to the .. page 2 :( g - COUNCIL MINUTES — APRIL 22, 1985 f r i1 o Tom Lancaster, Consulting Traffic Engineer for S & J Builders, stated he looked at the intersection of Sorrento and Scholls Ferry road where the traffic problem would most likely occur. A survey showed if there was no development at all the intersection would operate at a level C. IF there would be businesses in the area it would still be level C. " With a zone change the intersection would operate at a level 0. This could be mitigated at level C with a traffic signal. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED STAFF RECOMMENDATION A. Community Development Director and Planning Commission recommended approval of CPA 3-85 and ZC 3-85 from C-P to C--G Zoning. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION a Councilor Brian felt this issue should be looked at as a plan and that office space was not in demand now. He felt it did not justify a zone change at this time. b. Councilor Brian moved, Councilor Scott seconded, not to approve Ordinance No. 85-18. Staff is to bring back an Ordinance of the findings. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 10� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-85 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 1-85 ALLISON PO M1 PURLEARZNG OPENED a. Commun Development Director gave a suMmary of the proposal. The appla ion is supported by staff and the Planning Commission for a Compre sive Plan Amendment from Central Business District to Medium High nsity Residential and a Zone Change from C80 (Central Business) R-25 (Residential. 25 units/acre). NPO K1 had the opportunity bu id not comment. PUBLIC TESTIMONY PROPONENTS a. Kenneth Allison, applicant, 6445 NE Un Avenue, Portland, OR. stated when the property was first purcha d the zoning was C3M with a 10 foot lol. line setback. The City ha changed the zoning to COD with a zero lot line setback. The bedroo of the 10-plea face the commercial property and the tenants woul bably move out when this property is developed because of noise. Also the property _value would go down*. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUITES - APRIL 22. 1985 e e mom (� RECESS 9:00 P.M. RECONVENE 9:15 P.M. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 3-85 ZONE CHANGE ZC 3-N8p5O S7 L 3 BUILDERS Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from C-P (Commei"cial Professional) to C-G (Commercial General) for a 7.9 acre site. Located south side of Scholl* Ferry Road, immediately west of Greenway Town Center (WCTM ISI 348C lot 400). Associate Planner Liden reviewed the staff report and made staff's recommendation for approval with one condition. Discussion followed regarding the traffic signal at North Dakota/Sorrento and Scholls Ferry Road. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Hal Hewitt, representing the applicant, reviewed the history of the Greenway Towne Center. He explained how they would like to expand the center as Phase II with a mixed use of retail and office uses and how it was needed to meet the needs of the neighborhood. He requested that their traffic engineer, Tom Lancaster. address the traffic concerns- 0 Tom Lancaster. explained he had done an independent traffic study and reviewed the impacts the proposed change would have on the area. He felt with the addition of the traffic signal at Scholls Ferry and Sorrento Road would mitigate any increase traffic caused by this '. development. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Richard Boberg, NPO # 7 Chairperson, explained that the NPO had reviewed this project. Originally the vote was 4-3 against the change, however, after more review the vote had changed to 6-1 against the change. They felt this would create strip development along Scholls Ferry Road. The NPO would like to see the property remain zoned CP as they had decided upon during the Comprehensive Plan process. o. Bob Johnson, S ` J Builders, partners in the developers of Meadow Creek Apartments. explained that they had selected their site because of the immediate access to retail space. High quality apartment , e:nd high density put a high demand on retail sites and he supported making additional retail property available. o John Morris, Morning. Hill _ Association, supported the NPO recommendation. According to the Comprehensive Plan, more commercial property was not needed. He felt the change would cause a strip zone. 1985 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 2, REBUTTAL o Hal Hewitt, distributed photos of the area, a diagram of the what the proposed expansion would look like, and an aerial photographs depicting the Commercial properties along Scholls Ferry, from Hwy. 217 to SW North Dakota. PUB41C HEARING CLOSED o Discussion followed regarding surrounding zoning. traffic flow, and locational criterial (CG 8 1 A). _ o Commissioners Leverett, Campbell, Bergmann, and Peterson favored the proposal. Commissioners Fyre, Vanderwood. and Moen had mixed feelings. Commissioner Butler opposed. he felt it violated the locational criteria. Commission Owens reviewed the history of the NPO and their concerns at the time of the original NPO 7 plan. e Commissioner Bergmann mowed to approve and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward a recommendation for, e►pproval to City Council. Also, they directed staff to take into consideration previous use requirements when the Greenway Towne Center was originally constructed. . Motion passed by majority ;vote. Commissioners Butler. Fyre. and Owens voting no. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-85 and ZONE CHANGE 1-85 ALLISON <. 1, uest to amend the Plan designation from the Central Business Dis ct to Medium High Density Residential and subsequently changing the zo designation from CBD (Central Business District) to R-25 (Resident , 25 units/acre) for a 2 acre parcel. Associate Plan Liden reviewed the proposal and made staff's racosmendation fo proval. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Kenneth Allison, 6445 NE Uni Ave.. Portland, explained that he had nice quality apartments and di of want the quality to be destroyed by_having a commercial structure tit up to the property line. He felt his property had originally bee zoned residential and he would like to have it rezoned to residentia o protect the livability of the apartments. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Carolyn Eadon, NPO M 1 Representative. They d not have a recommendation as they had not reviewed the project. ti PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 2, 1995 Page 5 ^�� AGENDA ITEM 5.4 STAFF REPORT '« r April 2, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 A. FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 3-85 and Zone Change ZC 3-85 REQUEST: Amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Hap designations from C-P (Commercial Professional) to C-G (Commercial General for a 7.9 acre site. OWNER: S 6 J Builders APPLICANT: Portland Fixture Co. 5335 SW Murray Blvd. 338 NW 5th Beaverton, OR 97005 Portland, OR 97209 LOCATION: South flrrCR , immediately Greenway Town Center (Wash. o. TaxHap 1Sl34BC, Tax Lot 400). 2. Back rR ound The subject property was annexed to the City along with several other parcels in 1976 (ZC 12-76). The Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1983 designated the northern section of property for Commercial Professional and the larger southern portion for Medium High Density residential use. Site Development Review approval for a 304 unit apartment complex on the -southern segment of the property was granted in 1984 (SDR 22-84)• 3. Vicinity Information The eastern boundary of the site adjoins Greenway Town Center which is presently zoned -C-G. The area to the south is zoned R-25 (Residential, 25 units/acre) and construction of the apartment project has recently been initiated. In canjunction with the apartment complex, 125th Avenue will be extended along the western boundary of this site as well as the apartment project- This street will ultimately intersect with North Dakota Street at 121st Avenue. The parcel vest of this street extension on Scholls Ferry Road is also zoned C-P. Other parcels to the south are zoned R-7 (PD) (Residential, 7 units/acre, planned development). Scholl• Ferry Road and the City of Beaverton lie to the north. 4. Site Information The site is presentlundeveloped. A four-way intersection will be .► constructed at the Scholls Ferry/Sorrento Road intersection which will STAFF REPORT - CPA 3-83 & ZC 3-85 - PAGE l . � : 5 include a traffic signal. The proposed 'Plan Amendment and Zone Change will allow for an expanbed list of commercial retail activity. 5. AMency and NPO Comments The Building Inspection Office has no objection to the proposal. no objctin to the The State Highway Division sidewalkmatchingthe s eo facility togthe t t eastWill be noted that curb an required. The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. Site Development Review approval is required prior to development. b. Access to and from the site must be approved by the City and State Highway Division. c. Additional right-of-way should dedicated width chfrom olls Perry Road frontage to provide a right-of-way centerline of 45 feet. NPO f7 is opposed to the proposal and a representative will be present at the hearing to comment. B. PINDINCS AND CONCLUSIONS oals 2. The relevant crit ive inthis policies r2.1t1,a S.�i.lpls5.t1.14. 88.1.3, , and and 12, Comprehensive Chapter 12, Locational Criteria. ccludes wit the The Planningstaff ideonPlanning h Goals at e and proposal Cuideline�nsbasedt up upon the applicable following findings: 1. Goal I1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens Invo v ment the program including review of sll developmeIn ddition. all public Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO). notice requirements were met. 2. Goal f2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide Planning Goals. City Comprehensive plan Policies and Development Code requirements to the app 3• Coal f12 is satisfied because the proposal in conjjunctionn Scholls new traffic signal will not have a detrimental impact up Perry Road. ent. with The Planning ortions of the determined comprehe�ssivethe Planproposal basediuponnt the relevant the Po findings l - noted belov: i` 1. Plan Policy 2.3,•1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning 0' &nization and surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an opportunity ' to comment on the applicant's proposal- STAFF-.REPORT CPA 3-85 b ZC 3-85 PACE, 2 . . C 2. Plan Policy 5.1.1 is met because the proposal will have a small positive effect °upon the number of jobs available to Tigard residents. it is estimated that the subsequent commercial development will provide between 150 and 200 jobs. 3. Plan Policy 5.1.4 is satisfied because the proposed change from C-P to, C-C will not enlarge the area presently designated for commercial use and will not encroach upon nearby residential areas. 4. Plan Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied as a condition for development of the site. Before any commercial development occurs, City approval through the Site Development Review , process will be required. 5. The applicable locational criteria are satisfied for the following reasons: a. A residential zoning district is only adjacent along the southern boundary of the site. b. The site will not create traffic congestion or related problems which cannot be remedied by the proposed traffic signal at the Scholls Ferry/Sorrento/Horth Dakota intersection. c. Direct access to an arterial and collector street is available. d. Public transportation is available on Scholls Ferry Road. e. Because of its location and the Site Development Review approval which is required prior to development, a compatible relationship with nearby properties can be maintained. Concern has been expressed regarding the .potential this proposal would have for encouraging "strip" commercial development along Scholls Ferry Road. Although the Comprehensive Plan does not contain any policies which deal specifically with this issue, it is the staff's position that this proposal does not pose such a threat for the following reasons: 1. The site is presently designated for commercial use. 2. The change will broaden the list of commercial uses permitted and it will not displace residential uses. 3. Other undeveloped properties along Scholls Ferry Road in Tigard (and Beaverton for the most part) are designed for residential use. Conversion of these lands would require closer scrutiny on the part of the City. Also, 'the City is obligated by the f Hetropolitan Housing Rule to provide for an equal mix of single la' family and multi-family residences with an overall density of 10 units per acre.. Any proposal to convert residential land would need to show compliance with this rule. STAFF REPORT -CPA 3-85 b ZC 3-85 '- :PACE 3 A second concern relates to the intenQ of this C-P designation to ' provide to medical ant other profssionalthservicesestablishmentforheof general ares. This proposal would not Preclude activities since they are permitted in the C-G Lone Road well.Beaverton similar services ars established east Sc activieyssy exists in the and appropriate zoning Progress/Washington Square area. C. RECOtQiEtiDATICti he ing staff Based upon the findings and conc CPA 3-85 1ando ns ZC 3C8S subject ed above. s to Pthe nfollowing recommends approval condition: 1. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the SW Scholls Ferry Road frontage to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall by be hington County.isting right-of-waY The dedication documentsline as shall beeonaCityhforms Washington , and approved by the Engineering Section. BY: Keit Lidera APPROVED BY: William A. Honahan pggp Director of Planning Associate Planner 6 Development (KL•:pm/1130P) STAFF REPORT - CPA 3--85 & ZC 3-85 TACE 4 d G R E e" .17 H I iii L it S S O d I tii T E S 1730 SW Skyline Blvd P!+�tland OR 97221 rebruary 14, 1985 City Planning Commission c/o City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Ladies and Gentlmen- This petition is being filed by our office in behalf of Portland Fixture Company who, as you may be aware, also have an interest in the Greenway Town Center.- This petition seeks a planned amendment and zone change for approximately 5.4 acres of property lying immediately adjacent to and west of the existing shopping center on Schoils Ferry Road. As you are undoubtedly aware, this portion of the community, especially along the Scholls Ferry corridor, has experienced comparatively rapid growth in recent years. This continued growth has attracted the attention of the developers of the Greenway Town Center who feel demand within the market area justifies an expansion. We are aware of some sensitivity in the community retlarding commercial development and would indicate that any development occurring on the subject property will be done in a manner complimentary to the existing commercial center and with an awareness of the needs of adjacent residential areas. We would appreciate your thorough and carefu1 'consideration of this request and are prepared to accommodate any additional needed information. Vary truly yours, Hal Hewitt cc: Portland Fixture Co. ,5 r l 3,. * a o..aA._G�Re•�._��w.rwLwa _L, R'a}GP i1lP.tt� _ .15®"3! 292-6 9$3 s ^_s. SUPPORTING STATEMENT Plan Amendment Rezone Portland Fixture Co. February, 1385 REQUEST: To amend the comprehensive plan from commercial-professional to a general commercial designation and rezone accordingly. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located along Tigard's northerly common boundary with Beaverton. It's principal locational identity along Scholls Ferry Road makes it an attractive site for serving continued market demand for neighborhood and community shopping needs. Sorrento Road is planned for extension south of Scholls Ferry Roads it would form the western boundary to the subject- property. Multi-family residential development currently under construction along the adjacent southerly parcel would form the southerly boundary." Should the proposal receive City's endorsement, site planning will be carried out with two concerns objectives: one, to address any sensitivities or' CC ' � arising from adjacent residential areas; and two, a functional design which will complement the existing Greenway Town Center. • Urban 'development along the Scholls Ferry Road corridor both east and west from the subject property appears to be sub- stantially complete. Exceptions to this, in addition to the subject property, are a shallow site north across Scholls Perry.. Road in Beaverton, and a small parcel immediately west of the subject property. It is doubtful, therefore, that approval of the petition could lead to any of the common forms of strip commercial development which have occurred otherwise along some of the metropolitan. areas older arterial roads. SATE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES: This proposal is consistent with any applicable statewide planning goals. if approved, it will provide for -the orderly development of the subject property and the extension of a neighboring street and other related offsite improvements. In addition, it should result in reducing the duration of shopping trips by many shoppers, thereby reducing fuel consumption and motor vehicle emissions in the area. Also, it should enhance somewhat the economy in the general area as well. A • •i 'APPLIICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: 5,1,1 The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversi- fication of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the growth of the local job market. Comment: Proposed development on the subject property will generate 150-200 new job opportunities, all of which will be available to Tigard residents. 5,1,4 The City shall ensure that new commercial and industrial development shall not encroach into residential areas that have not been designated for commercial and industrial uses. Comment: if approved, this proposal will be entirely consistant with the foregoing policy. No portion of the site will actually encroach into a residential •area. All portions of the site perimeter will be buffered and/or landscaped as deemed apporopriate to ensure good continuing land use relationships. PROJECT SCALE: T21e:'following'characterises the proposed development on the r subject. propexty, ,, 1. Site size: 5.4 acres: 235,224 square feet 2. Trade area: 1.5 to 2.5 mile radius: 22,000 to 52,000 population. 3. Gross leasable area: Approximately 58,000 square feet. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA: 1.. Spacing and location: Subject property will share one common property line with a multi-family residential development on the south only. other residential development lies southwest of the site, but will not share a direct common physical relationship due to the extension of Sorrento Road. 2. Access: The proposed development site is intended to have one point of access on Scholls Ferry Road as well as one access point on the Sorrento Road extension. Given the character and ultimate design for Scholls Ferry Road, provision can be made to avoid unwanted congestion or traffic safety problems• The attached traffic analysis .will adequately address the various concerns relating to trip generations, vehicle movements and so on. w 4 t 3. Site characteristics: This site has been selected primarily due to its size and proximity to the existing Greenway Center, as well as its central position in an established trade area. if approved, all development will be designed in scale with the capacity of the site to accommodate retail demands within the trade area. The site also demonstrates a very high visibility factor given its location along Scholls Ferry Road. The proposed southerly extension of Sorrento Road will further enhance the visibility factor relating to the property. $. impact assessment: As previously indicated, intended commercial development for the property will be sized and scaled in a mannea- which will be quite compatible with the existing commercial development to the east as well as residential uses to the south. Privacy of the adjacent southerly residential area will be emphasized. CONCLUSION: The subject property is a primary candidate for responding to continuing demand for retail goods and services in this part of the community. It is a highly accessible site from virtually -every direction. its development should not produce any increased traffic congestion which may in fact be reduced somewhat with the completion of the Sorrento Road extension,. • = TOM R. LANCASTER Re: Transportation Engineering 2239 Monterey Lane rr�� 'fie Studies Eugene. Oregon 97401 4_ Ang (503)683-4818 Safety a GREENWAY TOWN CENTER PHASE II TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Scholls Ferry Road at Sorrento Road Tigard, Oregon P FOAl f��i�. � 8054 `. ® �L V 271.Z' . ��S R. L��A l TOM R.LANCASTER,P.E. TownpWatea+Ei9w4WwV r SITE DESCRIPTION The - proposed development is located on State Route 210, Highway dumber 143, known as Scholis Ferry Road, at the intersection of SW Sorrento Road in the City of Tigard. Scholls Ferry Road in this area forms the boundary between the City of Beaverton and the City of Tigard . The proposed development will be in the southeast quadrant of the intersection. The development will consist of 58,000 square feet of commercial retail space. The site design and the parking layout are not known at the present time. Scholls Ferry Road is two lanes in width in the vicinity of the proposed development, with left-turn refuges at the major intersections,. The average daily traffic volume is about 13,000 vehicles per day. Sorrento Road enters Scholls Ferry Road from the north to form a T-shaped intersection. Sorrento Road carries two lanes of traffic plus a center two-way left-turn lane. Sorrento is controlled by a STOP sign. A driveway enters the intersection from the south. In conjunction with planned developments to the south of Scholls Ferry Road, Sorrento Road will be extended to the south, and will then. curve to the east to intersect SW 121st Avenue at SW Dakota Street. This extension will probably be known as Dakota Street. On the Dakota Street approach to Scholls Ferry Road , which will form the fourth leg of the intersection, there will be two lanes for through traffic , plus a northbound left-turn lane and a northbound right-turn lane. Scholls Ferry Road will be striped for a left-turn refuge in each direction. The Oregon State Highway Division is planning to install an eight-phase fully-actuated traffic signal at the intersection. Construction of the signal is expected to begin in 1986. It is understood that two large housing developments are currently planned to: the;.,. south of Scholls Ferry Road. Both would have• access .to the Dakota -,- Street extension.;;The first development consists of 303 apartment units , ,° and the second consists of 120 single-family housing units. F l TOM R.LANCASTER.P.E. Trawa®ortalloa E^O.tann0 41 It is expected that the proposed development -will -have two access points to the adjacent street system, one on the Dakota extension, and one on Scholls Ferry Road. The exact location and the design of the accesses are not known at this time. TRIP GENERATION Projected trip generation can be estimated for the subject parcel both with the existing zoning and with the proposed zoning. Trip generation for the proposed housing developments, which would affect traffic volumes at the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road with Sorrento Road, can also be estimated. All trip generation projections this $ report will data in "TRIP GENERATION" , ThdEtiopublishedbythe Institute of Traffic Engineers. The existing land-use zoning for the parcel for which the development is proposed is commercial- professional , which allows up to ten percent retail development. Under the present zoning, ninety percent of the 5 . 4-acre parcel would probably be developed as professional offices. The estimated trip generation would be about 1170 trip ends per day, about 90 of which would be expected to occur during the avening peak hour. if the remaining 10 percent was developed as a 3000 square foot convenience store, the estimated trip generation would be about 970 trips per day, with about 100 trips occurring during the evening peak hour. This would result in a total of 2140 trips per day, with 190 occurring during the peak hour. ' Under the proposed zoning, which would be general commercial , the 58,000 square foot retail center would be developed. It is estimated that 4760 trips per day would be generated, of which 450 would occur during the evening peak hour. Assuming that about 25 percent of the trips would be diverted from the passing traffic stream, % as suggested by TRYEnewltrips3addedthe to the generated trips represent adjacent roadway system. The proposed apartment development is estimated to a � generate 2010 trips per day, and the housing development O. 1200 trips per day, for a total,of 3210. Assuming Dakota about two-thirds of the trips would use the :r ' {' ( ( TOM R.LANCASTER.P.E. Tunsportstbw Enpw-ew" Street extension to reach Scholls Ferry Road and that one-third would use 121st Avenue, the number of trips using the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road with Sorrento would be 2150 per day. About 215 of these trips could be expected to- occur during the evening peak tri r. TRIP DISTRIBUTION To determine the effect of the proposed development on the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road with Sorrento Road, the intersection level of service during the evening peak hour can be calculated first with only the housing developments, and second with the housing developments plus the proposed commercial development. It will be assumed in the calculations that the Dakota extension is constructed, and that the traffic signal is installed. All calculations will be based on methods described in Transportation Research Circular 212, published by the Transportation Research Board. With only the two housing developments in. place, the estimated evening peak hour traffic volume on the south leg of the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road with Sorrento Road is 216 vehicles. This would result in a level of service C at the intersection. With the construction of an office development and a convenience store on the subject parcel, the level of service would remain at C. With the proposed commercial development, although the access driveway configurations are not known, it will be assumed that there will be full accesses on each of the adjacent streets. It will also be assumed that traffic entering and leaving the development will be split' evenly between the two driveways, that the traffic - using the Scholls Ferry Road access will split evenly between east and west, and that two-thirds of the traffic using the Dakota extension will be to or from . the north and one-third will be to or from the south. With these assumptions, the traffic volume on the south leg of the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road with Sorrento Road is estimated to be 330 vehicles during the evening peak hour. This would result in an intersection ' level of service D.. As a Mitigative traffic measure, the northbound in r -3S9 - TOM R.LANCASTER,P.E. •r - T�oosPon+twn E�p�ne•n+W i olls Ferry right-turn lane on the Dakota extension romtth�hnorthbound Road could be signalized separately through movement. This would al o with north bo nd right turn movement to be overlapped westbound left tur south ink rsecti nnlegh This would required green time for the result in level of service C for the intersection during the evening peak hour. SUMMARY With development of the subject parcel under the present zoning, the reconstructed intersection of Scholls Ferry Road with Sorrento Road woulho peratetat level of service a during the evening peak parcel is deintersectioncommercial operateretail atunder levelnew f zoning, the intersection the northbound service D. However , by signalizing right-turn lane, the level of service could be improved to C. 60 -4- T _ t BALL, JAN 1 K & NOVACK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE MAIN PLACE 101 S.W. MAIN STREET. SUITE 1100 PORTLAND.OREGON 97204-3274 ROBERT S.BALL TELEPHONE(5031 226-2525 OF COUNSEL STEPHEN t JANII( TELECOPY 15o3)295-1058 JACOB TANZER KENNETH M.NOVACK TELEX 910-360-5470 JACK L-ORCHARD SUSAN M.QUICK WILLIAM H.PERKINS GIDS CHRISTOPHER p VICKI G.BAYLESS 1985 BARBARA W.RADLER October 25, MICHAEL C.WALCH DAVID A.URMAN SUSAN N.HOWARD The Mayor and Members of the Tigard City Council c/o Mr. Keith Liden menu Office of Community Develop City -of Tigard 12755 SW Ash P. O. Box 23397 - Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Portland Fixture company, & J Builders; Hea ing ber 28 1385 (CPA3-85 ZC3-85) Dear Councilors: request On behalf of S & J Builders, we respectfully that the hearing currently scheduled for October 28, 1985 on continued to November 18, 1985 for the the above matters be following reasons: (1) S & J Builders was notified by Portland Fixture Company on October 25, 1985 that Portland Fixture Company apparently does not wish to participate further in these proceedings. This p by Portland Fixture Company has come as a complete rs surprise to S & J crtunity to determ neutheerat- would like the opp y ,s Position. ionale for Portland Fixture Compan Y S & J Builders, at this point# isoinclinn itso to proceed with the hearing process if necessary. (2) On Wednesday, October 23, 1985, the City of Beaver- ton Planning Commission conducted hearings on an amendment SnW.rscholls g for Perryroperty a proposed pl almost immediately across Road from the property involved Fixture/S & J Builders appliclict involved a proposed amendment and rezoning req redesignation of a portion of that property to an OC use, which is a comparable use to the City BALL, .JANIK & NOVACK The Mayor and Members of the Tigard City Council C/o Mr. Keith Liden October 25, 1985 Page TWO of Tigard's C-P. The Tigard Community Development staff has indicated to S &l Builders that in light of the Beaverton aPP staffs to confer during be useful for the two City the next two weeks to attempt tocreach some type of understanding concerning the of the proposed uses and land use designations for the S.W. Scholls Ferry Road corridor. This effort obviously would have a direct impact upon the subject applications. Should there be any cost involved in the continuance from the October 28 meeting, S & J Builders will of the hearing the continuation of these defray. any City expense occasioned by that the City staff has proceedings. It is our understanding proceedings, and, in fact, no opposition to a continuance of the p oint for the believes that a continuance is in order at this p reasons outlined in this letter. Thank you for your consideration to this matter. Sincerely, Jack L. Orchard Of Attorneys for S & J Builders JLO:cmg cc: Messrs. Robert G. Johnson avid zimel William A. Monahan Timothy V. Ramis l CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: � L DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council Acceptance ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 68th & Parkway on July 8, 1985 L.I.D. #35 Legal Documents PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts REQUESTED BY: Bill Monahan DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE —-- � INFORMATION SUMMARY Final legal descriptions needed to secure entire right-of-way for 68th and Parkway Street L.I.D. This is a resubmittal of documents sent to Council on 9/17/85. Resubmittal is necessary because neither the City Attorney nor Engineer had a chance to review the documents prior to Council acceptance as required by ordinance. These steps have now been completed acid minor corrections to some of the legal descriptions have been made. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Accept attached agreements. 2. Deny agreements. `SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council accept the attached agreements. (DR:br/2034P) �p INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT Donald E. Pollock, hereinafter called the Grantor, in consideration of the sum of $1.00 dollar and other good and valuable consideration by the City of Tigard, hereinafter called Grantee, have granted and conveyed and by these presents do grant and convey unto the City of Tigard, a perpetual easement for the construction, maintenance and repair, with necessary access thereto, of a slope, cut or fill, occasioned by the construction, operation and maintenance of a public road and appurtenances within the following described parcel of land, situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Commencing at an old 3/4-inch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679, parcel III; thence along the north line of said parcel III on a bearing (basis of which is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of North 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds West a dis- tance of 78.36 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence along the arc of a 340.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 37 degrees 03 minutes 50 seconds, an arc distance of 219.94 feet (the chord bears North 16 degrees 51 minutes 59 seconds West 216.13 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 01 degree 39 minutes 56 seconds East along a line parallel with east boundary of Lot One of the recorded Plat of "Way Lee" a distance of 341.20 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 280.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 21 degrees 47 minutes 16 seconds, an arc dis- tance of 106.47 feet (the chord bears North 09 degrees 13 minutes 41 seconds West 105.83 feet) to a point in the east line of Lot One of the Plat of "Way Lee"; thence along the forementioned lot line North 01 degree 39 minutes 56 seconds East 9.27 feet to a point; thence South 87 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 7.03 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence along the arc of a 290.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 22 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds, an arc distance of 116.21 feet (the chord bears South 09 degrees 48 minutes 50 seconds East 115.43 feet) to a point of tangency; thence South 01 degree 39 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 169.00 feet to a point; thence South 24 degrees 58 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 58.00 feet to a point; thence South 65 degrees 01 minutes 57 seconds West a distance of 29.09 feet to a point; thence South 01 degrees 39 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 107.32 feet to a point; thence South 32 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 46.50 feet to a point; thence South 59 degrees 39 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 26.16 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence along the arc of a 330.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 29 degrees 17 minutes 42 seconds, an arc distance of 168.73 feet (the chord bears South 22 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds East 166.89 feet) to a point; thence North 88 degrees 12 minutes 14 seconds West a distance of 12.66 feet to the po'Jpt of beginning. Containing an area of 0.189 Sacres, more or less. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title or interest to the surface of the soil, nor any other rights except those expressly provided, however, that such use shall not be per- mitted to damage or destroy lateral support to the highway, and provided further that nothing herein contained shall grant to the City of Tigard the right to -excavate beneath existing buildings or deposit fill materials against existing buildings above the top of the foundations thereof, but is understood and agreed the City of Tigard shall never be required to remove the dirt or other materials placed by it upon said property, nor shall said City be subject to any damages to the Grantors, their heirs and assigns, by reason thereof, or by reason of the slopes constructed thereon, or by reason of change of grade at the street or highway abutting on said F property. ` t t E IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said GraAtee, its successors or assigns should cause said road to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of any such event. TO HAVE AND TO MOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. The Grantors, do hereby covenant to and with the City of Tigard, that they are the owners in fee simple of said premises; that the above described property is free from all encumbrances, and that they will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) has (have) hereunto set his (her) (their) hand(s) and seal(s) this aS day of 1985. r (SEAL) 10 ,jeZ� (SEAL) Gaut u.. ts+--�aounEoaMaax er ►ttorNeraa.rRcr. ( - STATE OF OREGON, ss. county of......Wsshi ngton......_. ._.. .. .. On this the. ....... ....... . ......23rd.... .da of. ..00tolSEsr 85 _.........._.... r....... J9....... . personally appeared M. L. KING ................................................ ...>�....poioc......._...................................-•---•-•--................................---- ..... who, being duly sworn (or affirmed), did saythat She is the attorney in fact for-............................................... .._DQnald that .she executed the foregoing instrument by authority of and in behalf of said principal; and ..-he acknowl- edged said instrument to be the act and deed of said principal. Before m6f ) (Official Seal) .-----............_......... .............-...... ..- ...... .. (signature) Nota 4 Public for State r)f Oregon { ...MyCOMM-issio Approved as to form this 'L bk day of .�,� 1985. By: Attorney - City of Tigard Approved as to legal description this 2 ay of 1 1985. � f ` By: Cit City of Tigard Su wdy r Accepted by the City Council thisaL'0"day of C'k-'1' ..,_.. 1985. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ..1� City Recorder - City of Tigard S s R/Gf�1T-OF-WAY /`�1P TAX LOT 200, / 5 / .3(eDQ► WASN//VGTO/V CO. OREGON 4- 9.27• R•YBO.00 Q•+x/�4T h6� �t O C. 1 0 ' I Wr :} IO0.B.039 .+U ?:•:: ft-290.00 C 3.'9.44"14 E •.a J/00 4.OT /WAY LEG, GENERAL .'CONTRACTOR. INC � DA 2400 OA r 2 t�r.4 x#•66 • CP 014 .9 4:1 '�'W d d d 3g.o9 s 50t0"11141W property Retained Io7.3s' PARCEL A O. 6110 AC=- property CS property to be Released gc.•Ii' ,yyp.o 4- 07•:0'so• 1- 0219-04 C�N/L•3!'9➢ � PARCEL. 40 . R 330.4io 0.OOrm AC � Li- 29 0 t T 42 '30.36' 0.B• C•Srzz004,49 ode sfrte.B9' 'Y 060 /t' p a 4'04'50' /• _ /t'c 400.00' C=S. 2e•390/~E. -44.50` posse 0`.a.w+-uentraL ruwea tae we�uK.var—lanyn ry'yy,a..rha.�.,.S..S.3� .......... ._-:.--' =i!` ;�'_-�"-- '.ii►-=---� t TK ' C7 ' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That 1, DONALD E. POLLOCK QQOD97�� pave made t 0 t to ed and appointed, and by the. present, du hereby make, constitute and appoint M. f. 1fN� my true and lawful attorney for me and in nay mane, place stud sh•,ul. -a-sol oma easy use stood lxoaclit to demand, sue tor, recover, collect and receive all such sums of money, debts, rents, dors, ucc'lunts, legacn•a, hrgaests, interests, dividends, annuities and de- r;k.) mands whatsoever,as are now at shalt hereafter becuue due, owing, puyiable ua b haiguag to me, to have, use and take all lawful - U ways end means in my name or otherwise for the recovery there'll, mad t., cmnaproruix, settle and adjust and to execute and ;..�, deliver acquittances or other sufficient discharges tut any of tile sans•, is. bar!a,ra. .,,atrjct tut, purchase, receive and take lands, r tenements,hereditatsents,and accept the seisin and possession ther.-uh joist rail deeds #rad other assurances in the law therefor and incluto leaso. Jet, demise,bargain, sell, remise,release, convey, growtgagl,toad hyp'lthe,jte )ends,tenements and hereditaments, d—ing my right of homestead in any of the same fur such prier, upon soch terms.,red curafitiuras and with such covenants as my said attorney #hall think fit. to moll, transfer and deliver all tar ally shares ul stock ow,led by toe in any corporation lot any prise and recriv3 payment therolru and to vote any such stuck as stay ptusv; to harxaita lor, ley. sell, mortgage, hypothecate and in any and #very way &aid almoner deet in and with gonads, wares Isla! nuv.d..uafis.•. .iu.s.•s in taction, and other property in pwNssion or in action, and to snake, do and transact all and every hind u/ la,sitaess .d avlaats.aevrs stature or kind; for toe and in my name and as my act and deed,to sign,seat,execute,acknowledge and deliver all deeds, cuveraants, indentures, agreements, mortgages, pledgee, hypothecations,bills of lading,bills,bonds,notes,evidences all drfat, receipts, 0`/44082493 and satisfactions of mortgages, jud2aents and other debts payable to am and other instrunents its writista tat who.»•ser kind stood nature which my said attorney in his disc cration shaft deems to be tar my best interests; to haves jccesa to jolly %,duty deposit lux which has been rented in my name;or in the nae of myoWl and any crime person or persons; oilsell, disc.au,at,eaadursr,deliver andlot deposit all checks,drafts,metas m �1 and negotiable instruments payable to my order, to withdraw any mora•:s deposited ita stay name with any bank and generally to i do any business with any bank or banker on any behalf; also GIVING AND GRANTING urutu tray said"trusts,-) hull posse. :,md aurhwa 1, to do and perlorna all and every act and thing „h:ann.w•v.•r r,-,pro2/te slid ra•.ressary to he doter in .mad stli—al the p e'som•s, as hilly t..all infests and purposes as I alight or could du it prrwaaaJly present, with lull power at suhatitutiura,40#41 m•ooratiuto, hereby r,atitsmg anal cuuluming all that my said attorney Us nes said arturney's substitute or substitutes shall hawlully du or rause to b0` done hay virtue all these presents. In cunstruing this instrument and where the contest sex requires, the singular i,e/ud40s the plural. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand aux! +esti on Sept. 12 , 19.2.2... . Donald E. Pollock SrArrs of 04saonr. Countytr of Mu.... .ltnom ..." . . a h �#m. Sept. ?.2.........,I9..??...., ails!appeared the within naawd Donald E. Pollock a _.. . _ ... .................. .. and aeknowhedged the foregoing itastrumemt to he ... hZ.g !! volunfarY ansif'dbdr r sr Before me: �s Notary Public for Wee on. (SEAL) 'Y /tSaJ My Cunuiussion aspires ..................._ STATE OF OREGON R.+it► --"" Poorer of Attorney County Woshinatan � SS . i� C n . 1. Roger Ttomsson, Director of Records _ :......... . - .. .. and Elections and Ex-Oflacao Recorder of Con- - veyances la said county.do hereby certify that o Donald E. Pollock the within instrument of writing was receiv i, ! s . . .......... .............. ....... . and recorded in book of tetxartfs of tial �•�r�-� ° TO a a S/ ROGER THOMs•- sIV. 7y�•�o<of " e M. L. King �� Records A Cwetions o `o. t p OOu� 0 - c . C Don l+�` "` "MOT env. T1oIDEXEQ 10211 S.W. Barbur Btvd. •� � Suite 202 E n -+ r x Portland, Oregon 97219 �Q ft 2® Ce Y V LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE RELEASED WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM Individual Grantor Donald E. Pollock, Grantor, conveys and warrants to City of Tigard, Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon, to-wit: Parcel A That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Commencing at an old 3J4-i6ch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679, Parcel III ; thence along the north line of said Parcel III on a b wring (basis of which is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of North 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds West a dis- tance of 78.36 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence along the arc of a 340.00 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 37 degrees 03 minutes 50 seconds, an arc distance of 219.94 feet (the chord bears North 16 degrees 51 minutes 59 seconds West 216.13 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 01 degree 39 minutes 56 seconds East along a line parallel with east boundary of Lot One of the recorded Plat of "Way Lee" a distance of 341.20 feet to a point of curva- ture; thence along the arc of a 280.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 21 degrees 47 minutes 16 seconds, an arc dis- tance of 106.47 feet (the chord bears North 9 degrees 13 minutes 41 seconds West 105,83 feet) to a point in the east line of Lot One of the Plat of "Way Lee"; thence along the forementioned lot line South 01 degrees 39 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 619.49 feet to a point of curvatrue; ., thence along the arc of a 400.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a 4 t central angle of 4 degrees 56 minutes 53 seconds, an arc distance of 34.54 feet (the chord bears south 26 degrees 39 minutes 01 seconds east 34.53 feet) to a point in the north line of Parcel III as described in County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679; thence along said north line South 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 72.31 feet to the point of begi nni ng. Containing an area of 0.380 acres, more or less. Parcel 8 That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows; Commencing at an old 3/4-inch pipe called the point of beginning of County i Recorder's Fee No. 80-1407% Parcel III; thence along the north line of said Parcel III on a bearing (basis of which is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of Ndrth 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds west a distance of 150.67 feet to jhe point of beginning of the land to be described; thence along the aft of a 400.00 foot radius curve to the right, _ through a central angle of 04 degrees 56 minutes 53 seconds, an arc distance of 34.54 feet (the chord bears North 26 degrees 39 minutes 01 seconds 34,53 feet) to a point in the east line of Lot One of the Plat of "Way Lee% thence along the aforementioned lot line South 01 degree 39 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 30.36 feet to a pipe, in the north line of Parcel III as described in County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679; thence along said north line South 88 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 16.38 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.006 acres, more or less. The said property is free from all encumbrances except... The true consideration for this conveyance is $41,987.50 (Here comply with the requirements of CRS 93.030) given as a credit in the S.W. 68th Parkway Local Improvement District No. 35 dated this X8 day of 0422 O , 1985. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY PARTICULAR USE MAY BE MADE �dns +J/��s.l ' Ac TUC ooAocoTv ncCrDTOM TMJ TUTC . . X. ' � �. �•� HUM N.. 159—ACCHOWLIDOMINT BY A"OMMNJAM STATE OF OREGON, as. County of...W.......ashington .... __ .. .......__ ....._.. .__ On this the. .2-3rd. ... ..�./.��_7... day of.... .. October... .__ _.., 19a5 personally appeared ..._......-.. .....---...._....._"------- -_1/....111E\�..-......................-'---"` ........ ....- ....................... ......_..._......:. - ._ _.._., who, being duly sworn (or affirmed), did say that .`-'_he is the attorney in fact for _........ ...... .. ona1�3...E.. Pollock --............._..........._ _ and that .s.he executed the foregoing instrument by authority of and in behalf of said principal; and she acknowl- edged said instrument to be the act and deed of said principal. Before MeF (Official see) lt4! .ILZ, r Mvwture) Notax/ Public for State of Oregon •- 1Ky-•commies ................ : 8l2.Oi'89 Approved as to form this 2 h " day of 1985. By: 1 y Attorney - City of Tigard Approved as to legal description this ?¢, ay of z/G��D�'d- , 985. By:- City Jbigince, - City of Tigard Isu wmyr• Accepted by .the City Council this 9fM day of1985. CITY COUNCIL, CITY of TIGARD, OREGON 86�5 �j, City Recorder City of Tigard t INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT Raymond A._F_ei4htmeir and Frank M. Warren, Jr. hereinafter called the Grantors, in consideration of the sum of $1.00 dollar and other good and valuable consideration by the City of Tigard, hereinafter called Grantee, have granted and conveyed and by these presents do grant and convey unto the City of Tigard, a perpetual easement for the construction, maintenance and repair, with necessary access there- to, of a slope, cut or fill, occasioned by the construction, operation and maintenance of a public road and appurtenances within the following des- cribed parcel of land, situated in the City of Tigard. Washington County, State of Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: Parcel I A parcel of land in that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Town- ship 1 South. Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian in the City of Tigard, Washington County. Oregon, described as. follows: Commencing at an old 3/4 inch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679 of parcel III; thence along the east line of said 5 parcel III. also being the west line of a parcel described by County Recorder's Fee No. 82-3895. on a bearing (basis of bearings is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 618.87 feet; thence North 87 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 85.36 feet to the point of beginning of the slope easement to be described; thence North 24 degrees 24 minute's 09 seconds West a distance of 48.62 feet to a point; thence North 22 degrees 46 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of 134.91 feet to a point; thence North 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 101.45 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence along the arc of 369.50 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 41 degrees 19 minutes 12 seconds, an arc distance of 266.47 feet (the chord bears North 18 degrees 52 minutes 32 seconds West 260.73 feet) to a point of tangency; thence North 39 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 30.33 feet to a point in the west line of the land described in County Recorders Fee 82-3895; thence, along said west line. South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 15.15 feet to a point; thence, leaving said west line. South 39 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds East a dis- tance of 18.96 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 359.50 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 73 degrees 29 minutes 15 seconds, an arc distance of 461.09 feet (the chord bears South 02 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East 430.13 feet) to a point of reverse curve; thence along the arc of a 256.48 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 02 degrees 27 minutes 54 seconds, an arc distance of 11.03 feet (the chord bears South 32 degrees 43 minutes 10 seconds West-11.03 feet) to a point of compound curve; thence along the arc of a 47.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 123 degrees 34 minutes 45 ., seconds, an arc distance of 101.37 feet (the chord bears South 30 degrees 18 _- minutes 10 seconds East 82.83 feet) to a point in the north line of the Oregon Department of Transportation's right-of-way as described in County Recorder's Fee No. 80-22549, said point being the point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.2 acres, more or less IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not co9vey any right, title or interest to the surface of the soil, nor any other rights except those expressly provided, however, that such use shall not be permitted to damage or destroy lateral support to the highway, and provided further that nothing herein contained shall grant to the City of Tigard the right to excavate beneath existing building or deposit fill materials against existing buildings above the top of the foundations thereof, but is understood and agreed the City of Tigard shall never be required to remove the dirt or other materials placed by it upon said property, nor shall said City be subject to any damages to the Grantors, their heirs and assigns, by reason thereof, or by reason of the slopes constructed thereon, or by reason of change of grade at the street or highway abutting on said property. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said road to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors. their successors and assigns in the case of any such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee. its successors and assigns forever. The Grantors, do hereby covenant to and with the City of Tigard, that they are the owners in fee simple of said premises; that the above described property is free from all encumbrances. and that they will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever, with the exception of the instruments listed below and any matters which would be disclosed by a survey or inspection of this property, 1. Restrictions and limitations of access created bys a. Deed from State of Oregon to PGr recorded January 29, 1962, Boots 456, Page 434, Washington County. b. Deed from PGE to State of Oregon, recorded December 4, 1980. 2. Easements reserved in the following deedes a. OEA to State of Oregon, June 27, 1980 (slope) b. OEA to State of Oregon, June 27, 1980(Drsinage) e. Oea to State of Oregon, July 1, 1980 (elope) d. OEA to reichtmeir and Warren, February 179 1982 (sign) 3. Conditions and restrictions as disclosed by Contract of Sale from OFA to reichtmeir and Warren, February 17, 1982 t�. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) has (have) hrreeunto set his (her) (their) hand(s) and seal(s) this %S' day of RPRIL-- 1985. JA aAaS (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ) )ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) � �-/ 1985 Personally appeared before me the above name6/ who executed this instrument and each of them acknowledged to me that this instrument was executed voluntarily and freely. (NOTARIAL SEAL) Notary Public for Oregon My Commission expires Approved as to form this day of CL<^ , 1985. 8y; C y Attorney - City of Tigard Approved as to legal description this Y-1dayof if� 1985. w By City E'* City of Tigard S✓rvQkj>v^ Accepted by the City Council this ag 'Nay of �-te ler- 1985. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON 8y City Recorder - City of Tigard Y C� R/CHT OF—WAY MAP TAX LOT /0I1 / S/ 3ry®A WASHINGTON CO. OREGON OLIRI 2 Z7 h li 41 zcv 04- /t= 299.so • , ' R= ZS&.48 L- 3S/. /s, ' /OZ DA L 03 = //. • , n 1 IV e - N. / 47 04 E. 43.,-: —j 3O.55' !/.a3 C=S. SO /d, /0�♦tn. ¢' ®L.Bs L FEE Na � 0 82-584,P5 p se y,3 Y-P0'S •9r� PARCEL AS `: PARCEL A O.90 Ar-- Ra 95q.�.0 O + i .Gro�.AC- c=S. 2` 47 30 E. 0 41"1,12 4x0./3' :a R• 3"50' FEE NQ. L= ZfiG X47♦• ., �'6• . N. 1.47'Di�E. Q.E.A. 2500 DA <" AOIC>A �x r i'4_ �k N. ZZ•46 oSNE. F N.Ze 24'09'w. 40.&e tey AT1. MrA ST . A�87.54 Z8 t. :•.�•: -• (MAI'NES) _ ._.._ f WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM Individual Grantor Raymond A. Feichtmeir and Frank M. Warren, Jr., Grantor, conveys and warrants to City of Tigard, Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon, to-wit: PARCEL A A parcel of land in that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Commencing at an old 3/4 inch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679 of parcel 1I1; thence along the east line of said parcel 11I, also being the west line of a parcel described by County Recorder's Fee No. 82-3895, on a bearing (basis of bearings is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 618.87 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence on a bearing of North 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds East along the west line of said tract a distance of 123.83 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence, leaving said west line, along the arc of a 299.50 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 04 seconds, an arc distance of 321.13 feet (the chord bears North 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds East 305.97 feet) to a point in the west line of that tract of land described in County Recorder's Fee No. 82-3895; thence along said west line North 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 98.62 feet to a point; thence, leaving said West line, South 39 degrees 32 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 18.96 feet to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 359.50 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 73 degrees 29 minutes 15 seconds, an arc dis- tance of 461.09 feet (the chord bears South 02 degrees 47 minutes 30 Iseconds East 430.13 feet) to a point of reverse curve; thence along the arc of a 256.48 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 02 degrees 27 minutes 54 seconds, an arc distance of 11.03 feet (the chord bears South 32 degrees 43 minutes 10 seconds West 11.03 feet) to a point of compound curve; thence along the arc of a 47.00 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 123 degrees 34 minutes 45 seconds, an arc distance of 101.37 feet (the chord bears South 30 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds East 82.83 feet) to a point in the north line of the Oregon Depart- ment of Transportation's right-of-way as described in County Recorder's Fee �* No. 80-22549; thence along said right-of-way South 87 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.658 acres, more or less. t PARCEL B A parcel of land in that part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township I South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Commencing at an old 314 inch pipe called the point of beginning of County Recorder's Fee No. 80-14679 of parcel III; thence along the east line of said parcel Ili, also being the west line of a parcel described by County Recorder's Fee No. 82-3895, on a bearing (basis of bearings is the Oregon State Plane Coordinate System) of South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 495.04 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence on a bearing of North 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 305.97 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence along the arc of a 299.50 foot radius curve to the right, through a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 04 seconds, an arc distance of 321.13 feet (the chord bears South 01 degrees 47 minutes 04 seconds West 305.97 feet) to the point t of beginning. Containing an area of 0.200 acres, more or less. The said property is free from all encumbrances except... as 11sted in $chedel3.e A attached. the true consideration for this conveyance is $82,660.50 (Here comply with the r6quirements of ORS 93.030) given as a credit in he S.W. 68th Parkway Loccanl Improvement District No. 35 dated this O day of f•'iw1 1985. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ANY PARTICULAR USE MAY BE MADE OF THE THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. A BUYER SHOULD CHECK L" WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY nR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED_USE,S. STATE OF-% -� It —�ss. County af_Lel 198-S-Chia daq of A.D. 19$ before me,the undersigned,a Notary on Public in and for the State ofKI duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared to me known to a the individual.—described in and who executed the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that--he—.signed and sealed the said instrument as..�--free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. `�n�t` Notary Public in d for the S to of�l1 re.idias• (Aeh»owledswent by individual. Pioneer National Title Insa"me Cempaag- Fane L 28) f Approved as to form this 14- day of �_ 1985. By: _Attorney - Gity-of=T-igard- he . 1985. Approved as to legal description this 1�day of By: City - City of Tigard VB�aD" Accepted by the City Council this day of /C-k tib 4'"' 1985. CITY CO , CITY of TIGARO, OREGON City Recorder - City of Tigard i Schedule A - Attachment to Warranty Deed of May 89 1985 to City of Tigard 1. Restrictions and limitations of access created by: a. Deed from State of Oregon to PGE recorded January 29, 1962, Book 4569 Page 434, Washington County b. Deed from PGE to State of Oregon recorded December 49 1980. 2. Easements reserved in the following deeds: a. OEA to State of Oregons June 270 1982 (slope) b. ORA to State of Oregon, June 27,1982 (drainage) c. OFA to State of Oregon, July 1 , 1982 (slope) d. OEA to Feichtmeir and Warren, February 179 1982 (sign) 3. Conditions and restrictions as disclosed by Contract of Sale from OEA to Feichtmeir and Warrens February 17, 1982 4. Any matters which would be disclosed by a survey or Inspection of this property. c tri ai�vr=OF wAr /tip TAX LOT /O/, / S / 36,OA WAS"WevTON CO. OR4640N OL O S. 88•/Z�/'SNE. 'T?.3/� -7f3.3G�-_ h II ® • N �. A : 2`07'04N Rs 1 25(o.43 299•'-�® �•aw �a` ISS./S Ra 3' L= //.03 L °S21.1" , a a /0.2 DA C-S. 82.43' 10"W. 47 04 td.9G w ©/, 3.34!.45• ® :``Vii`;•`:�'s. R•47.00 C=9. 30• /0,/a FEE No. 82-3D95 &a 73.2f°9!e PAAVEL A► ^I s $59.SOS 0 OZO E AG= % a's<;`. .to SO.AG 2 L• 4fa I.09�• s � O • � � 34*50 FEE No. �� ' rq' L• 266.Iy • 32s'JLN W. N. 1'47'010 E. ar.. t a :w•�r•:> � JOAMCdr4L.s FE/C14rME/R -- O.E.A. "t��, r• bb44/6T/�EN 2300 DA ':: a" 101 DA Mk N. 22.44,Our E. N.24.2404►rW 40.44! 3 -es3��•' � CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: !� DATE SUBMITTED: October 22, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: RETIREMENT LEAVE POLICY PREPARED BY: J. Widner REQUESTED BY: B. Jean DEPARTMENT HEAD ON: �i�i _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE To establish a retirement leave policy for the City of Tigard. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Personnel Rules are in transition and do not address a retirement leave policy at this time. Union contracts provide for union employees, however management and executive employees do not have a policy. Two management employees are considering retirement within the next two years and would like to have a policy established before making their retirement plans. The attached resolution would provide this mechanism to the management and executive employees with imminent retirement plans. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Do nothing. 2. Adopt attached resolution. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 85—_9j A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A RETIREMENT LEAVE POLICY FOR CERTAIN CITY OF TIGARD EXECUTIVE AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the City desires to establish a fair and equitable retirement transition process that reasonably meets the needs of the retiring employee and the City, and WHEREAS, this retirement transition would include credit for unused sick leave, vacation and unpaid overtime in the form of retirement leave, and WHEREAS, this process would provide the City reasonable time to recruit a replacement. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: The following shall be the retirement leave policy for the City of Tigard: Section 1. Affected Employees: This policy shall affect those executive and management employees who have filed their intent to retire with the City Administrator on or before December 31, 1986 with official retirement dates of no later than June 30, 1987. Section 2. Retirement Notice: City employees who intend to retire shall give at least six (6) months notice of their intended retirement date. This notice shall be in writing and directed to the City Administrator. Section 3. Retirement Leave: Retirement leave is the combined total accumulation of any unused vacation accrual, any unused unpaid overtime accrual and 1/2 of the unused sick leave accrual. This total accumulation can be used by the employee to defer his official retirement date and leave employment prior to the official date. All accruals shall be computed to the official retirement date. Section 4. The City Administrator or designee shall verify the accumulated sick leave, unpaid overtime and vacation accruals to be applied to the retirement leave schedule. Section 5. This policy may be amended or repealed. PASSED: This day of , 1985. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST: Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 85— Page 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM ##: 12 DATE SUBMITTED: October 24,_1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Discussion of 10/21/85 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:72nd Avenue LID Discussion PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: William A. Monahan DEPARTMENT HEAD OKCITY ADMINISTRATOR: ^^� POLICY ISSUE Should the City expend $7,300 plus engineering fees to make a modification to the 72nd Avenue and Carmen intersection? INFORMATION_SUMMARY Marlin Be Haas has informed me that the cost of the proposed improvement to the intersection of 72nd Avenue and Carmen Drive cannot be charged to the project, therefore, if the Council chooses to authorize the modification, it must be funded from the Systems Development Charge funds or delayed until other funds become available. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Authorize the expenditure of $7,300 plus engineering fees to make the improvement specified in the memo of Be Haas and Associates, Inc. , dated September 26, 1985. 2. Direct staff to close out the 72nd L.I.D. without authorizing the modification. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council direct staff to proceed to close out the 72nd project without further modifications. (WAM:br/2035P) f MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council October 24, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: 72nd Avenue Discussion At the October 21 City Council meeting, I presented to you a proposed modification to the 72nd LID prepared by Marlin De Naas. The Council requested clarification of whether, or not the $7,300 cost of the improvement (Plus engineering costs) would be paid from City SDC's or charged against the project. Marlin informed me today that the cost of the project could not be charged back to the project as the cap established by the Council has been reached. Therefore, any additional expense must be borne by the City. Given my review of the situation on 72nd, I do not feel that this improvement is essential. The number of vehicles which presently find the condition to be confininV, is slight. In addition, future use of properties between 72nd and I-5 may not have uses which stimulate lac. ot _ ke the improvement now and a further need arises in the future, we may If we d be able to condition site development reviews on the site to this improvement. (WAM:br/2031P) i P'. i Vii. v Ilk DE HAAS ys Suite 300-AGC Center 9450 S.W. Commerce Circle Wilsonville. Oregon 97070 SS O C 1 a t e S, Inc. (5os) 6ee-2450 2% 297Consuhing Engineers & Surveyors September 26, 1985 Mr. William Monahan Director of Community Development City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bill , This letter is intended to be an interim report on 72nd Avenue traffic concerns that were relayed to us by you and Bob Jean on August 2, 1985. The specific items to be evaluated were as follow: 1. Trucks (the largest variety of 18-wheelers) making the turn from Carman Drive to northbound on 72nd sometimes run over the curb and encroach on the left-turn refuge. What type of modifications could be made to improve this movement? 2. Trucks (18-wheelers) making the turn frorg 72nd •• Bnones Ferry to southbound on 72nd Avenue encroach on the left-turn refuge. Can some reasonable modifications be made to improve this movement? 3. Can vehicles in Item 2 above be given more priority and therefore not have to wait so long before turning left without upsetting other reasonable priorities. Item 1 is illustrated by Exhibit "A" and "B". Exhibit "A" shows the existing signals, striping, 50-foot curb return and traffic control configuration. There is evidence to support the contention that some 28-whag ee_r_sh�av_e a problem with 72nd ,d �n _.C_a=a_n I l:i ve. Marks appear- whet tires have jumped the curb. Observation finds that while many of the 18-wheelers can stay within the designated lanes, the largest variety have to encroach on left-turn refuges in order to make the turn. This is done by using the left-turn lane on Carman at the start of the turn or using the left.-turn lane on 72nd at the end of the turn. At this point in the report, it may be well to note that encroachments are not uncommon for the very largest variety of 18-wheelers. In this instance a 50- foot (very large) radius was used which is adequate for all but the largest 18- wheelers. This is the largest radius used throughout the project, except at the Durham Road intersection (which is on the State system) where the right-of-way widths are between 70 and 90 feet. Recall that the council , in locations of City jurisdiction, chose to limit right-of-way purchase of 72nd Avenue to 50 feet plus 5 feet either side as a utility easement and build the street at a 40-foot r width. I i t , ®fit s Mr. William Monahan September 26, 1985 Page 2 If it is deemed appropriate to make modifications to accomodate the largest 18- wheelers, the following items of work would be required to achieve the realignment indicated by Exhibit "B": 1. Remove and replace approximately 150 feet of curb. 2. Move a catch basin. 3. Relocate the signals wiring junction box. 4. Relecate the fire hydrant. -- 5. Relocate the power pole, guy system and underground leads. 6. Widen paving to match new curb location. 7. Purchase additional right-of-way and utilities easement. Both the power pole and the hydrant were moved earlier as a part of the 72nd Avenue project. PGE has offered to move the pole at—aQ._.cSt _-to'the City. Tigard Water District a that charges to the City to move the hydrant would be approximately 1,000.002t_ Construction and right-of-way costs for this Item 1 work are estimated as follows: Construction $3,830.00 Right-of-way 2,000.00 $5,830.00 >3 ( S Contingencies (25%) 1,460.00 TOTAL $7,290.00 Item 2 has been investigated by our Traffic Engineer. There dues not seem to be any physical evidence to confirm there is a turning problem. The turning radius is adequate for the design vehicle. Accordingly, we recommend that no changes be made at this intersection related to turning radius. Item 3 has been investigated by the State (OSHD) who finds that the timing is as e—ssfgned and is appropriate. Accordingly, we recommend that no changes be made at this intersection with respect to signals timing. We will be pleased to meet with the City regarding the merits and procedures for effecting the modific tions discussed in Item 1. Sincere , Marlin J De Naas, P.E. Preside t. Enclosures cc: 80.194.118 194LTR.S26 W 5 4 z ` a ►W' w U�/JI � V mo' 00 — ` s 41 ti w fti LQ op � � I i t i LLJ Z 9 Z It w Z ,PAs N 4 NIN i w � t 2 Q LLI ui lk S t � ,� a .�•'a � o13E5 • • s s ew , • ams � Jam~ � , • T T � J � e= v i i • •r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON € COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY / AGENDA OF: October 28 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly Report September, 1985 Community Development PREPARED BY: W. A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: �' J'- CITY ADMINISTRATOR: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: _ INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached please find the Monthly report for September, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3. Code Enforcement Report — Not available this month 4. Economic Development Minutes ..LL 5. Engineering Division Report 6. Operations Division Reports 7. Planning Commission Minutes 8. Transportation Committee Minutes ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED .ACTION Accept and place on file. (0950P) k MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the City Council October 24, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Monthly Report — September, 1985 Attached please find the Monthly Report for September, 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. Elements of the report are: 1. Annexation Report 2. Building Division Report 3. Code Enforcement Report — Not available this month 4. Economic Development Minutes 5. Engineering Division Report 6. Planning Decisions 7. Operations Division Report 8. Transportation Committee Minutes Following is a comparison of building activity for September of 1984 and 1985: t SeEtember, 1984 SSetember, 1985 Single Family Permits 13 28 Mc ti—Family Permits (total Units) 32 4 Commercial Permits 9 1 Building Permit Fees $ 16,985.15 $ 14,652.50 Plan Check Fees 5,656.54 7,785.89 Plumbing Permits 2,567.60 3,792.50 Mechanical Permits 482.50 860.00 Sign Permits 50.00 115.00 Valuation $ 5,027,200.00 $ 3,380,450.00 Through the first eight months of the year, activity compares to 1984 as follows: Single Family Permits 149 214 Multi—Family Permits (total Units) 35 342 Commercial Permits 40 11 Building Permit Fees $ 93,445.75 $ 135,390.17 Plan Check Fees 44,197.19 56,785.10 Plumbing Permits 27,060.09 68,529.79 Mechanical Permits 3,985.52 7,748.00 Sign Permits 1,570.00 845.00 Valuation $21,959,203.00 $34,384,749.50 (0950) Building Building activity in the residential area continued strong. Permit fees for the September period were below 1984 as September of 1984 was particularly strong in terms of commercial activity. If the Building activity is only moderate for the final quarter of 1985, the total development figures should exceed 600 total new residential starts (250 SF, 350 MF), and over $41 million of assessed valuation. In 1984 the comparable figures were 278 units (195 SF, 83 MF) and $28,766,912 total assessed valuation. Economic Development Committee John Savory was elected as Chairman of the Committee and conducted the downtown Tigard information meeting. Significant interest was expressed by downtown property owners and businesses on terms of the need to improve the downtown area. (WAM:br/0950P) MINUTES TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE [ September 17, 1985 Meeting 7:30 A.M. - Pioneer Pies Members Present: Jim Corliss, Dick Cochran, Kathy Budny, John Savory, Susan Clark, Tony Orlandini, and Pat Kennedy Others Present: Mark Padgett, Bill Monahan The minutes of the August 20, 1985 meeting were reviewed and accepted as written. John Savory was elected unanimously as chairman and conducted the remainder of the meeting. The Committee discussed the format for the downtown improvement meeting scheduled for September 24. The meeting will be coordinated by John, Bill and Jeanne Caswell. The Committee role will be described as well as the action taken to date. Questionnaire results will be presented, then the participants asked to provide their input. Funding sources will also be discussed such as lottery proceeds, local improvement districts, and systems development charge proceeds, and zoning. John suggested that the Committee's role in the downtown should be to prompt action and coordinate the efforts of the property owners and businesses. The Committee should take an advisory role. The 1985-86 Action Plan was discussed briefly. Goals from the 1984-85 plan will be revised and continued. Bill will bring back a revised plan for Committee reivew and adoption. Mark Padgett presented the Washington County Fee Per Trip proposal. The proposal, if adopted, would standardize the contribution by developers for the construction of transportation systems to accomodate increased development needs. The concept would ideally create a system of payment where a fee is paid by a developer which reflects the inpact of a particular development on the system. The County hopes that cities will also adopt the system to create a* uniform system in place of varied systems development charge programs. Development activity would encourage other new development with the improved public improvements. Mark cited examples of where the new system could result in further new development while under the old system. A developer could be precluded from development. Ne pointed out that the Metropolitan Nome Builders have supported the program but want the prospective home owner to pay it. Tony expressed concern about the method used to establish the standard fees as it is apparent the fees for retail development were rounded up. Jim suggested that Bill work up a couple of examples of how the proposed costs would malate to existing fees in Tigard. The Bus Trip scheduled for the 19th was discussed. The group will meet at 7:00 A.M. at City Hall for the one hour tour. September 17, 1985 Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 Bill presented the City's brochure prepared for distribution at the Japanese brochure illustrates Tigard's committment Mayor's Conference in Portland. The to encouraging new development. that TVEDC will hold its quarterly membership Tony informed the Committee Committee members were invited to attend. meeting on Monday, September 30. Bill reported on the joint effort by Washington County and TVEDC to provide economic development coordination. Tigard will be involved.. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 A.M. The next meeting will be held on October 15, 1985 at Pioneer Pies. (WAM:br/1981P) -t 0 1 f MEMORANDUM P CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Downtown Property Ownerss//Businesses October 15, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, �f�E Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Downtown Meetings On Tuesday, September 24, the Tigard Economic Development Committee held a meeting at the Community Center to discuss issues which affect the downtown area. The Committee was pleased with the turnout and the many suggestions presented. As a result of the meeting, a second meeting will be held on Wednesday, October' 23, 1985 at 6.30 P.M. at the Tigard Community Center. Please plan `::o attend, we would appreciate your input and involvement. Most of the discussion centered on the questionnaire results which were previously distributed to you. From the results, the participants at the meeting derived the following list of issues: { - At the north end of Downtown, someone should remove the State's trees to Increase Visibility of Downtown - Allow erection of signs to identify Downtown - Sign Code Restrictions should be reviewed - Paint buildings attractive colors -- City should maintain parks - Billboards should be removed - Need some limited time parking and metiers - 20 minutes and 2 hours - between the Manila Express and Burnham - Off-street parking needed - Park and ride lot for Tri-Met needed - Roof top parking off Pacific Highway should be evaluated - Police should enforce parking regulations downtown - Police should review or survey traffic speed on Main Street - is there a problem? Page 1 - Review landscaping requirements in Downtown - are they too restrictive? Construction of an off-ramp from Pacific Hwy. should be investigated with coordination of lights and buses Extend off-ramp to Electric Ave. (over Commercial) Keep the angle parking as it is because it controls speed Post Office should provide more mail drop boxes at convenient places on Main Street Traffic jam at Post Office should be alleviated Improve access to U. S. Bank Access to and from Main Street - Scoffins should be improved Main Street bridge needs to be improved as trucks are too heavy Appearance of the "Silver Building" must be improved. It is the most visible problem and is not kept up HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS? Explore funding sources Grants to property owners for improvement to their buildings Public Improvements could be made Local improvement Districts could be formed Systems Development Charges could be used to make improvements Lottery funds could be used Main Street Program should be investigated Downtown Merchants Association► could be formed Small business aid from State - low interest loans should be looked at Page 2 WHO SHOULD BE INVOLVED ANO WHAT GROUPS CAN TAKE THE LEAD? City - devote time to help formulate plans Chamber - possible part time staff time to work with a committee City group "Downtown Organization" . . .A downtown committee . . .Organized group to speak for the area to: - City - State - Funding sources Most of the comments concerned the Marin Street area. Perhaps this will become the first focal point of the review. Please let us know if you have other issues which you think the Committee, Chamber, City, property owners, and businesses can collectively address. We look forward to your attendance and participation at the October 23rd meeting at the Tigard Community Center on Commercial Street. (1992P) Page 3 .� fib•+ ti 1�1/ ap. a m v y ., .r m c �[, •o h m .+ u L mm Cl ~ 1tf b h O+ OM •+ co O O N N N m co N a N M M M M M rn m C C N�t C ti Ln N b .C-1 co W H� i- Q �+ o a o 0 In0 e o com to W h W W W co co m W m pp11 W P P h N N N N h 1A A h rtN h N �+ P ` - 1. O h C. m N a N ^+ N N T 111 LL'! b b b 6 b O O «+ O VGo n m N W tl1 P O P h 6 ® M 3 f a 'n h o ,; Q1 4 111 M LI O b co < m O N m ® M rt 11t 10 W P O S O O S 8 O 8 O b O li/ N P P P P rt r.- Go .W f %,fn finb b 1Q co C`p m .00 �. rt P O 1fi h O m A A O •+ 1T h .+ rt W .• rt q L .L40 n 16 3 4j Ln CL CL t7 {moi S Q L h h ¢ y i a F � p p C O S O O O O O O O O aM m m � w y A u L a 1�s G7 O '+ N N w w N rr co ellm N O N O O O v co In P m f P v co N N N W U G O O C O O f O P yC rn N O O O }^ O P lOf1 M P fly {Ct M � cp f O N N P w .w Cf M M J H Y Ct m emv m �o P ut �!` P a • f n ♦+ f d .+ ... N N f p C �b C O `O N N ii1 N 1l1 •r ca M co P O O C O O O O 8 8 1p is O n L 6 °n n o L d cl C G i L pT C .,Ti G N gym. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council Members October 22, 1985 FROM: Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner (' SUBJECT: Annexation Report for September 1985 On September 4, 1985, the City Council held a public hearing to consider a request by Scholls West Inc. to annex 1.11 acres into the City of Tigard. The Council voted unanimously to forward the request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. At the same meeting, the City Council reviewed a request to annex .80 acres located on S.W. North Dakota into the City. The Council unanimously approved a resolution forwarding the request to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local. Government Boundary Commission on September 9, 1985. Copies of the September S and September 9, 1985 City Council meeting minutes are attached. (EAN:pm/2020P) MEMORANDUM CIT'i OF TIGARD TO: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development FROM: Randy Clarno, Engineering Services Manager DATE: October 23, 1985 SUBJECT: Engineering Monthly Report for September, 1985 Function Personnel Time in Function September I. Private Development Services A. Land-Use Application review 6% Be Improvement Permits (Subvd., half-street, sewer & Delg. projects 48% C. Public/Agency assistance 10% D. Property Vacations . 1% {rF IT. Geographic Information Services A. Mapping and Records . . . 4% Be Survey and Design 1. P.W. Maint. Projects 0% 2. City Wide Control . . . 0% 3. Capital Project Engineering . . . 0% III.Capital Development Services A. Public Fac. Master Plan review and update 0% Be C.I.P. and L.I.D. Admin. assistance . 8% C. Street C.I.P. assistance. . . . 0% IV. General Admin. & Misc. Personnel Reviews, training, staff meetings, Citizen committee support, Section management, Budget prep., union meetings, Computer, Master Plan, etc.... 17% V. Non-productive time (Holidays, vacations, sick leave, etc. 06% VI.Revenue Activity FY 85-86 FY 84-85 A. Engineering Service Fees & Charges September September 1. Improvement Permits (I.B) 10,485.26 1,369.92 thru September thru September 33,847.59 6,316.64 B. Public Works Operations Fees S Charges FY 85-86 FY 84-85 September September 1. Streetlights . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,021.92 472.32 2. Traffic control Signing . . . . . . 833.00 - 0 - NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS September 1. Cotswald Meadows No. 2 21 Lots Located on SW 135th Ave. across from Morning Hill Drive - Under Construction. 2. Summerlake No. 2 13 Lots Located east of Summerlake - Under Construction. 3. Penn Lawn Estates 13 Lots Located on SW 115th south of Springwood Drive - Under Construction. 4. Self Service Furniture Store - Gaarde half-street Located on Gaarde Street at Pacific Hwy. - Under Construction. 5. Arlie's Plantation 6 Lots Located at the corner of SW 97th and McDonald. (RSC:br10840P) 3 COMMUNITY SERVICE VOLUNTEER WORKERS Washington County Corrections For the Month of: September 1985 City of Tigard NAME Hrs Ordered Hrs Worked Wes Young 8 Pat Smith 5 .5 Mark Ellis 8 Michael Reed 10 Jerry Beghtol 32 Mike Weldon 2 Jeff Caldwell 2 3.5 GREEN THUMB _ Mary Mosely 52 Walt Van Tuyl 80 Total Community Service 114 .0 Total Green Thumb 132 .0 ' � I h N O .O �I m P tD P M OD V'1 P � •O N `O M O O N N H Y Y M I ✓ 6 7 Y M Y r O b p Y r j ti 0 1 N M n O O y I M J M T Y Y J N P P J •G e+ 10 .Ca p 410 N L b co 1~K P 06 c o V 6 H n i k M M N f� 1� 04 Y1 N P M • • a ✓ ✓ •w M1 h N CO J .r h co M J P 1 m O N N M w O Y r .r M1 J N N• M Z L �u N M 0 b y s r J P r co n N a i Y h N M •p M J J N M M L ✓,• M � M1 N N M .O J � O � i+ L J O N O •c P P J ~ N .Mt h •.n M M N d) r✓ J J p J P .r O r h P J N c0 J n C O N P d m N clo w o h J •O •r N .Pi r .D y cc M h M1 O N el P OD p. n w O M O W O M J J n .D m J N O• Y N � O m J n O M — O ••O N M1 m N .O N P n J H M co Y O N P O rt O � r O J O .fl O P N M1 n O O M O i• O n N O N • • • .r M N n r CO ...1.•• • O Cr .D O M M1 N N m n n N N M M r4N5 • e � m . w Is. � • � r w .•. u V • r y v r l O Z • .�, r N • • • r l .� S � r i =• •i 2D •= it v � 7` rF H rh. r y Y r y r i [t >.Y> > r • • • y r r • r V Y • •c • i i • r i r• • r• • •• i yiF✓ i 6 i rc a r p. 6!Y V t► V � V Y !V N •.Y 7•• NY i V NY N= by N V N V •v r1 O O e O O o O O © O O O O O O o S i yLi.Y 1 n O Y Y N u 6 r • Y • O 0.Q d • r i Y 1b+y • .p �t .+ Y • C i • • L J U • p • w 1 I • L r � W Y s d V � N y d W 1 S 4 J J V 1 r tiC O m O N 1+'1 ac' W U e d • ^ 46 N w � O� n J O = v _ p •. a� • • Y J O co u-+ n Go f+ L N N n Y eT w A N w M U J 1'1 O M N R M r{ so NO A ti .O r1 v • P � O c0 ! •@ ' y N O O O w N O O .s c0 m O O O O O d M O n N N 04 N n .s w r 10 r � r • r • MY • s • M YG u f r w M O O " "' • r w 6 r i r w r i rr �'i w r U 7H 7Y t Y ri • �w sr rte. 2r • M 6 s• rM •• rs r• rr r• r •U •Y YO J N �'s •�r r• r rr • •r w♦ j• •u Oq aE+ m ♦�)M ww� w• vs S« sw MY no 6 � w . +. • w w a - r n wwi n 1 , a01000aiee@Oaaa f. Y • I h O O ,0 J Vl O N M co M N r vl m J ^ w O N M m O O N N N F V i Y V .1 w • 4 A � Y Y Y • O O d Y • M y J M h p W y u O a h J n 6 M V • O J N n n K•. M J V Y C O d • • X J ~ w ~ C u M W 0 0 Y O • s 16 I �•. J J I wk me Y V B N Y W c �u X Z CL W Y FtAt z X O � 1 W C O J a0 J r J K 03 .o N W • I y y V N h n N n t0) N n N O w't m n O. I ° Y • ,O p h n 00 n .0 D.iu. 7 y N 1V x X 21 = ZM M y P y Y n J J O N n h N N N N ^ O P J ti d °`n n n r N R b m N m J It 0 0 c N N N m a 1; n J J +0 O. Q O N 01 OC m m N N N N n W O 4 Y n O N m t0 M J ✓f ,D M O+ 170 R n m !n N 1b O. N • .O O. N r J b ,O J h N r° m o o .n m J J .o n J v7 n Y v N o1 m v+ N N N In r O d rN 00 n n J N n N O M R y Y N n N N n J �n N v1 O J 3 • N N W V , e0 ti J n a v o 0 o a o o v o.. • o 0 0 � w s ► .1 i Y Y • f Y •• • • Y •• • Y • f .� • M• w1• r Y • N a • e• ) ti: w• • •u f u O S f 0 f Y O O O yy O i O I f • O •u O L O u f i �+ O, ►L r V ♦V •V �.i �0 •r 0 V Y �V f.r ►�{ ►.Y `V b y 4 V � w - W 1 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS € FUEL USED For Month of: September, 1985 DATE: 10/3/85 TD Gallons Monthly Using De t. Gallons X yr-to-date $ Amount Account Number PWWW 284 .3 141 734 .8• 10.21200-611 PWST 238.4 118 746.6 10-21300-611 PWSS 18.3 009. 51.0 10.21200-611 PWP 177-.0 088 486.9 10-21400-611 Y ADM16.0008 64.6 10.32000-611 ENG. 73.4 0361 226. 7 10.22400-611 BLDG 121.8 061.1430. 6 10„22200-611 PD 901.9 448 3,267 .5 . 10-11200-611 i PD 146.2 073 353.0 10.11300-611 P.W. Admin. 5.2 Fin. & Serv. 6.0 003 25 . 9 10-12100-611 Municipal Ct 2 8. 1 014 28. 1 10-13000-611 Plan. & Dev. .2 000 5 .2 10-22300-611 Mayor & Coun. 1 . 1 001 12 . 3 10-31000-611 Civic Cente . 1 000 .9 Fin & Serv- S 1.4 10-12300-611 TOTAL ( 1. 146 per gallon) B il.l M. GALLONS IN: 2 ,017. Jerry McNurlin Capt. Jennings GALLONS OUT: (2 ,012 -8) Cpl. Meyers ;. Bob Jean NET: Finance i P11!sLti: WORKS OPF-PAI jjN t tSua c !, Of September 1985 Aatc 10/2/85 H31nte:�anc.� FcPort .85 ._ YEAH TO DA.TE _CURREmT_MONTU t .iui) Pa J ... --- [A TOTAL Pi10 __-PU ---•._T0TAL ! 58:23 29 . 131 87.36 _ 9.2 ,82 96. 7 189.60 t ' Oil t 707.98 707.98 707.98 423.00 1 , 130_98 Tires , Maint _16 bar - — Kaint . 51,56 51 .56 120. 18 144_55 264 . 73 Parts -� Repair Labor ,Aepair 644.99 105 .50 750.49 11817.77 1,086.74 2 ,904 .51 Outside 1 187.24 95 .35 1 .282_59. 1a air ; 3 tfRL �� ------.. 1, 178_97 1 „013.28 . 2 , 1T92.25 3 ,346.,23_._t 3 ,909• 'S �FS .�8.7 , 2 ,641 . 73 I , 147.91 ! 3, 789 .64 ?,272 .22 5 .756.06 . T3��Z8.2� 1 TOTAL .. ..__ ._._ _� M. Frank Currie Jerry McHurlin Lt . Wheeler c;apt . 3enni+ngs i A f_. 4 MONTHLY REPORT CITYOF T1CAtD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON DATE: 10/2/85 FOR MONTH OF: Septembpr 1gR5 TV OPERATIONS OFFICE: WASTE WATER: 2.1.2 36.0 hrs T.V. Inspection 135 .5 hrs Sanitary Sewer Clean 78.0 hrs Storm Drain Clean 30.0 hrs Catch Basin Maintenance 39.0 hrs Manhole Repairs 147.5 hrs Ditching STREETS 2.1.3 26. 5 hrs Street Cleaning 111.5 hrs Patching 15 .0 hrs Painting & Street Marking 101.0 hrs Sign Miantenance _ 90.5 hrs Brushing & Limbing 14 .0 hrs Sanding 6.5 hrs Community Service Labor PARKS 2.1.4 GREEN THUMB LABOR 101.5 hrs Mowing 83.0 hrs Mowing 1 .0 hr Irrigation 83.0 hrs Restroom Maint. 24 .0 hrs Restroom Maint . 3.0 hrs Ballfield Maint . 16.0 hrs Building Maint. 5.0 hrs Rec. Equip. Maint . 50.0 hrs Landscaping 8.0 hrs Landscaping 6. 5 hrs Trails Maint . 101 .0 hrs Community Service Labor SUPPORT SERVICES 2.1.5 18.5 hrs PM on Equipment _ 122 .5 hrs Scheduled Repairs 12.5 hrs Unscheduled Repairs 81.5 hrs General Support 12755 S.W.ASN P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 10/ 11/85 tb ,r PARK MAINTENANCE REPORT ( For Month of: September 1985 There was a total of 339 .5 maintenance hours at Cook Park, with 144 .5 hours Mowing, 3.0 hours Irrigation, 103.0 hours Restroom maintenance , 5 .0 hours Ballfield maintenance, 24.0 hours Building maintenance , 50.0 hours Landscaping and 5.0 hours Trails maintenance . CITY EMPLOYEES GREEN THUMB LABOR 75.5 hours mowing 69.0 hours mowing 3.0 hours irrigation maint . 75 .0 hours restroom maint. 28.0 hours restroom maint. 5 .0 hours ballfield maint. 24.0 hours building maint . 5 .0 hours rec. equip. maint . 46 .0 hours landscaping 4 .0 hours landscaping 5.0 hours trails maint. 97.5 additional Community Service labor FANNO CREEK PARK; 25 .0 hours GENESIS : 1 .5 hours CITY HALL: 3.0 hours POLICE DEPT: 2 .0 hours LIBERTY PARK: 1 .0 hour SENIOR CENTER: 2 .0 hours (Green Thumb labor) SUMMERLAKE PARK: 11 .0 hours (2 .0 hours Green Thumb labor) JACK PARK: 11 .0 hours ENGLEWOOD PARK: 14 .0 hours ( 12 .0 hours Green Thumb labor) BUS STOPS : 2 .0 hours } 11GARD PLANNING COMMI:,;STON REGULAR MF_F"T:I:NG - SEPIFMRI-R 10, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut — LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present. President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Owens, Peterson, Vanderwood, Bergmann, and Campbell. Absent: Commissioners Fyre and Leverett. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Staff noted that Commissioner Owens name had been left off the list of Commissioners present. President Moen requested that his comments be added to page two of the minutes for CPA 9-85 and ZCA 11-85, Commissioner Peterson moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Campbell abstained. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o President Moen explained that the City would be composing a survey and wanted Commissioners to think of questions they would like to see on that survey. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENT - DONALD OLSON - NPO N 3 o Staff explained that they had tried reaching Mr. Olson by letter and phone and had been unable to contact him. Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded for staff to contact Mr. Olson and see if he would be able to attend the October 8th public hearing. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. 5.2 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 5-85 RICHARD KADEL Request for a Zone Ordinance Amendment to allow auto body shops as a conditional use in the I-P (Industrial Park) zone. Chapter 18.68 of the Tigard Community Development Code. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the request and made staff's recommendation for amending the Code. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 10, 1985 Page 1 x APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Richard Kadel , 14180 `,W 1.41st, Tigard, OR, 97224, explained he was the Ow110r' (.,f,Tip;.it'd (raft; 13udy nd nr �.rl .,i l:r, roalOt, l.;• f',i ', hrasinc'ss i'rrnn downtown Tigard to an area which has high v i s i.bi.l i.t.y. He had located a site, however, automotive body work is not allowed in an IP zone, which the property is zoned. tie requested that auto body shops be allowed as a conditional use in the I—P zone. He did not feel that heavy truck repair should be included. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Dennis Thompson, Tigard Arco, 12475 SW Main Street, supported amending the Code as recommended by staff. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Lengthy discussion followed regarding making the change and whether heavy truck repair should be excluded from the request. Consensus of the Commission was to exclude heavy truck repair and limit the size of vehicles which could be repaired. Discussion followed regarding the difference between gross vehicle weight (GVW) and gross cargo weight (GCW) which is a term presently used in the Code. Commissioner Vanderwood moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward ZOA 5-85 to City Council with the recommendation to allow automotive and equipment repairs, using a separate category excluding heavy repairs, limiting the repairs to vehicles with a GVW of 10,000 lbs. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioner present. o Staff was directed to research the difference between GVW and GCW so that the Code would be consistent. The Commission indicated that regardless of the definition used, it should be made clear that large commercial vehicles continue to be regulated as currently provided in the Code. 5.3 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 3-85 TIGARD ARCO/DENNIS THOMPSON NPO # 1 Request for a Sign Code Exception to allow a freestanding sign of approximately 26 feet in height where a maximum height of 20 feet is permitted and a size of approximately 105 sq. ft. where 72 sq, ft. is permitted, on property zoned CBD (Central Business District). Located: 12475 SW Main Street (WCTM 2S1 2AB, lot 2800) . Senior Planner Liden reviewed the application and explained that their was some confusion as to the size and height of the size and that the newspaper ad was inaccurate and would need to be readvertised. He suggested that the Commission open the public hearing, take public testimony then set the item over to the October hearing to make their final decision. Staff recommended denial. He read a letter from Chuck Woodard, Tigard Liquor Store, supporting the Sign Code Exception. Also, a letter from William Monahan, Director of Community Development was / reviewed. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 10, 1985 Page 2 APPLICANT'S PRESENTAI-ION Dennis Thompson, owner of Tigard Arco, su-,At od he w�As confusad as to why hO noodnd a Silan ('ode Fx oPtioln .la F�+d Sohn i f 1(,(j pl,:t , to Lho tiui id ing official and was Luld he dial not a permi L for tFte change and now wa,. being required to go through the public hearing process. Lengthy discussion followed regarding when the sign was installed, what changes had been made to the sign, the need for going through the process, and when nonconforming signs would need to come into conformance with the Code. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mrs. Geraldine Ball, NPO # 4 Chairperson, commented that the Health Habit had been allowed to keep their nonconforming roof sign and she felt Tigard Arco should be allowed to keep their sign. o Further discussion regarding the size and height of the sign. The Commission directed staff to research the history of the sign so they could be sure of the facts. * Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to set the hearing over to October S. 1985. The motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS 6.1 Street Vacation requests for SW Tigard St. - "Mull"; SW Walnut Place/99W "Hudson"; SW 74th Ave, near Cherry - "Fox"; SW 122nd Ave. near Springwood - "Johnson"; SW 67th and Clinton - "Larson" where reviewed. o Commissioner Bergmann commented that he felt someone should get paid for land taken away in the SW Walnut Place/99W proposal since the Hudson property will acquire property that was originally obtained from the parcel on the opposite side of Walnut. o Discussion followed regarding SW 67th and Clinton - "Larson", that there was adequate access for all. parcels. * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to recommend approval to City Council with special attention for SW 67th and Clinton to insure proper access was available for all parcels. 6.2 Request by Titan Properties to eliminate the pedestrian path loop for Colony Creek III. o Senior Planner Liden indicated that the staff recommended one of two options: 1. Construct the path in cooperation with the Public Works Maintenance Supervisor and retain the existing conditions of -° approval. PLANNING COP'MIISSION MINUTES September 10, 1985 Page 3 2. Eliminate the requirement for a path and have Titan Properties vacate the public parcel to be served by Lhe path and return it to pr iMelte cwn or �Jiip o Steven Bleak, Titan Properties, 20945 SW TV Hwy. , Beaverton, 97006, explained that the cedar trees were dying because of the impact of paving next to them. o Lengthy discussion followed. * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to allow Titan properties not to construct the pedestrian path with the parcel to be retained by the City. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Moen voting no. 6.3 President Moen asked staff what the status of their transportation resolution was. Had it been mailed to all the jurisdiction as requested? Staff would research and advise them at their next meeting. 7. Meeting Adjourned 9:25 P.M. Diane M. Jelderks, Secretary ATTEST: A. Donald Moen, President. 1895P/dmj PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 10, 1985 Page 4 TIGARD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 5, 1985 MEETING tgett Vice Mark PRESENT: Members To(Sullivan (Chair),Bishop PaLidi3a(Balodis,Chair , Bob Kempter Secretary) , Milt Pyre, Dennis Hummel. Staff: Bill Monahan City: Phil Edin, Tom Brian Guests: Dave Atkinson, Bruce Warner, Geraldine Bell. ABSENT: Joe Schweitz. The meeting was called to order at 7:31 at City Hall by Chair Tom Sullivan. Dennis Hummel was introduced as the newest member. The minutes were approved as corrected. The correction by Mark Padgett reflected the serious reservations about the MSTIP proposal which the Committee had. Bruce Warner presented a brief overview of the MSTIP (Major Streets and Transportation Improvement Program), after which a lengthy and frank discussion ensued on the Committee's concerns about the timing and funding of projects in the Tigard Area. Close questioning of Bruce darner by Tom Brian on the funding problem reinforced the Committee's concern that the projects in Tigard are toward the end of the 13 year program. Another concern is how the projects on the list are changed in precedence. Tom Brian also wants a firm assurance that the terms on the Administrative Details Letter of July 17 1985 are made pari of a County Resolution. After a listing of the concerns expressed all around, they became reservations in the resolution we ( prepare for City Council, It was moved+ seconded and passed (5 for, 2 abstain) that the committee recommend approval with the following reservations: I 1 , That the Southwest Bypass Study be given top priority. 2, That Tigard Dollars are spent in Tigard, 3. That the Tigard Comprehensive Plan be honored. 4. That local control of funds is allowed 5. That Tigard projects are done sooner than later. 6. That Tigard in assured by County that the Administrative Details are honored as presented in Frank Angelo's memo of July 179 1985. The information OU "Fee per Trip" did not reach the members in time for a thorough review and thus will be discussed next meeting. The time line of Tigard projects was briefly discussed. The revisions will be brought up again next meeting. Next, the Greenburg Rd. - 99W underpass and ramp onto Commercial was discussed. Staff will return with more information on land ownership and the validity of the $250,000 price tag. The Committee discussed how we need to change the Comprehensive (2) Plan and the time line for doing so. Hill Monahan stated that it takes about 4 months to be a reasonable lead time. The Committee ' discussed briiefly what our process will be to change the plan. There will be more discussion later. The signalization of 99w was the next discussion topic, and the Committee will ask Bob Jean to explain the need and process to change this. Hill Monahan then presented the current situation at Scholls Ferry Road. He presented new information about the boundary . and the proposed connecting roads within Tigard, between Walnut and Scholls Ferry. More direction from City Council was seen in the funding for the Murray Road Extension. Concern was expressed by the Committee over the possibility of 135th not being allowed to go to Tigard°s control by the County. This in connection with the proposed Murray Road extension. The Committee then discussed a fixed monthly meeting date and time. The first Thursday of each month at 7pm was decided pending the approval of the absent member. Chair Tom Sullivan adjourned the meeting at 9:35. Re ootfully. Submitted, Bob Ke e , ecretary. Robert W. Hempter Jr. 12480 S.W. 129th Tigard, Or 97223 Tom Sullivan, Chair Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee Dear Tams With heartfelt regret I must ask you to accept thds letter as my notification of resignation from the Transportation Advisory Committee. Unavoidable career work will take my Thuroday evenings and far more each week. Even if another evening were selected, I would still have had to resign* as the time committment would be too great to leave adequate preparation time for the tasks ahead. Please be assured I have greatly enjoyed the time I have spent on the Committee. I have learned a great deal and hope my contributions are of value. I will continue to follow with interest your work In this area so vital to Tigard's future. Sincerely, L . ( RO e t sm r s RECEIVED 14 1985 UT`! OF TIGARD ` Y TIGARD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 3rd, 1985 MEETING Presents Tom Sullivan (Chairbur Bishoadiette�Vice-chair), L.idija Balodis, Milt Fyre, Jos Schweitz, Absent' Dennis Humoral . Guestst MarK De Ment, Geraldine Ball , Bob Jean. called to order by Chair Tom Sullivan at 7105 PM. The The meeting was oved• Items 4 and 5 were minutes of the previous meeting were appr removed from the agenda due to the absence of staff member Duane Roberts. MarK gave a presentation of the county 's new "fee-per-trip" plan but did not maKe a recomme^dation. Wilbur, L.idiJa and Milt expressed concern of the Plan and how they relate to Tigard's about certain aspects particular situation. Bob Jean explained county a^Hc e &airfunding dfeesMaybe mechanisms including criticism of fee-per-trip". distorted downward which could result in 'zoning" for the Purpose of road building determining distribution of funds and g Tigard, estated Tualatin and _ his opinion the new plan may not be desirable in Tigard, might help in Comnitteethe to taKacuppF,-PtTdwhe^^ty andaifas. ensus the City Council dec i'des to consider it. Tom road a letter that the county sent to the CAty of Tigard regarding county still was problems with county policy on road Jurisdiction. The the Murray road extension. The county has postponed until D:camber 3rd a Committee appointed MarK as official decision on Jurisdiction. Ths Mason to the county on this issue and recommended that the City Council designate him as such. Dennis Hummel was appointed by Tom to be Committee secretary, mainly due to the fact he was not there to defend himself. Tom read a letter from ODOT regarding traffic impact in the Tigard triangle area. He then discussed the new Committee timeline received from Bob Jean. Milt gave an overview of thetransportation Plan update procedure and will worK on a mechanism to achieve i.idija expressed concern and dismay at recent variances granted by the $ City Council . 27 PM. The meeting was adJornsd at 9i sl /Ix MEMORANDUM CITY OF FIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayer and City Council October 21, 1985 FROM: Jerri L Widner, Finance Director�^' SUBJECT: DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY -- SEPTEMBER, 1985 During the month of September, the City received 6,190 telephone calls and had 2,166 walk—in contacts. Support services processed 16,123 pages of documents and had a turn around time of 5.4 hours per work order. Of these requests, 57% were emergency requests. Accounting processed 433 accounts payable and payroll checks, 1500 sewer/storm drainage bills, 1,451 receipts and 15 journal entries. There were 40 purchase orders processed, 1 SAIF claim for injury to a finger was filed: 2 recruitments, 6 hires, 0 terminated and 2 unemployment claims. The insurance claim status report is attached, along with an emergency purchase report. (11OOF) t'` 9/30/85 CITY OF TIGARD CLAIM STATUS REPORT DATE OF LOSS CLAIMANT DESCRIPTION STATUS 2/13185 Mervin Boen False arrest pending 8/21/84 George Kusiowski Ins. impounded clt's car no activity 2/4/85 Fredric Nickel Criminal counter cplt. open 3/20/83 Fred Oran False arrest open/atty. working on this es False Arrest pending Alleges 1/11/85 .Harry Field 9 (Office Merrill) 3/30/85 Steven Courtney Owen Alleges Auto Accident due pending to insured spilled oil or road Unknown George Hludaik Alleges his constitutional pending rights violated Unknown Neil Gerrard Alleges his constitutional pending rights were violated 7/13/85 Miller, Tracy L. Ins, backed into claimant's $2530.16 collision pd. car P.D. amount still pending 7/3/85 But--Thank Van Ins. hit clmt. pulling pending out from stop sign claim reopened 7/20/855 Steven Bacon False Arrest 3/16/85 Julie B. Winkelman Wrongful Death pending (OH:pm/0886F) MEMORANDUM TO: LOCAL CONTRACT REVIE14 BOARD 10/3/85 FROM: PURCHASING AGENT RE: EMERGENCY CONTRACT UNDER LCRB 90.010 The City Administrator authorized the issuance of a purchase order under emergency conditioais, in the amount of $1350. for the removal of two trees without first securing of the 3 informal quotes. The situation r€girding the two trees is as follows: Tree growing in public greenway, rotten and leaning toward house at 11475 S.W.--Venus Court lGenesus). Tree--is -about 3' behind house: Genesus Loop, middle island, removal of fir tree which is bet1hgd held up by another tree. Due to the recent high winds, the public hazard to life and property and possible liability, it was recommended an emergency be declared and the trees be removed immediately. The contractor engaged has been used before. When receiving prior quotes has been the law bidder. t (7T'GARD IBRAW PUBLICphone 639-9511 12568 SW Main-Tigard, Or.97223 MONTHLY REPORT September 1985 TO: LIBRARY BOARD CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN WCCLS: Criteria was set which will be used to choose an automated circulation system for WCCLS. Demonstrations were presented by some vendors and trips to libraries using particular systems were arranged. A representative from Tigard Public Library attended every meeting and/or demonstration. The vendors replying to the formal Request for Proposals were: ULYSIS, GEAC, DRA, CLSI, INLEX AND DYNIX. Members of the professional board will contact one or more libraries using these systems as part of the evaluation process. All members of the network will have input, but the final selection will be made by a committee selected by and from the network. Library Furnishings RFP: At City Council meeting on September 4, the Council approved the proposal to divide the library furnishings Into 6 lots. Lot #1--Wooden Furniture, est. $86,624. Lot #2--Metal shelves and stack lighting, est. $38,227. Lot #3--Area carpets, est. $5,203. Lot #4--Miscellaneous furnishings, est. $11,882. Lot #5--Re- furbish antiques, est. $747. Lot #6--Plants, est. $2,549. Total estimate--$145,061. The recommendation to call for bids on Lots #1 and #2 immediately and to wait until those bids were in before getting quotes on remaining lots was also approved by a majority of the council present. The estimated cost for all lots is $145,061. Council expressed concern over the cost for furnishings. Librarian and Board Chairman responded that great care had gone into selecting a quality that would withstand wear and tear as well as be attractive and that all efforts would be made to reduce costs whenever possible. Return of operating funds to the general fund in light of the passage of the WCCLS levy was also discussed. This is to be discussed further as bids come in. The Request for Proposals was prepared for Lots #1 and #2 and issued on September 12. Bids•were opened September 30, 1985, at 3:00 PM. Five bids were received on Lot #1, with Environetics, Lake Oswego, low bidder at $74,.544,:93. Svur.4 Business Systems, Seattle, was only bidder on Lot #2, at $35,321.81. However, both bids were below the estimate by $14,984.26. Kiwanis Visit: Librarian and Walt Munhall visited the Tetrapolitan Kiwanis Club September 16, to publicize the new library facility. Response was positive. Personnel: Twenty-two volunteers gave a total of 215.5 hours; daily average, 8.6; staff time, 35 minutes. Two community service assignees worked a total of 12 hours; daily average, .48; staff time, 25 minutes. Library Board members gave 16 hours. Work Indicators:: September 1985 September 1984 Adult Materials 5374 5095 Juvenile Materials 2674 2329 TOTAL 8048 7424 Days of Service 20 20 Average Daily Circulation 402 371 Increase/Decrease Circ 8% -22% Reference/Reader's Advisory 204 206 Materials Added/Withdrawn 673/- 330/31 Borrowers: New/Renewal 167/86253 144/116-260 Youth Services: September is traditionally the month in which no youth activities are provided. It is used to plan for programs beginning in October. TIGA7 RD LIBRARY PPUUUIC phone 839-9511 12588 SW Mein-Tigard. 0r.97223 MONTHLY REPORT August 1985 TO: Library Board City Council FROM: City Librarian WCCLS: At ;he professional board meeting on August 8, it was decided to ask the Citizens Advisory Board to form an ad hoc committee to include city managers, the WCCLS professional board and the Citizens Advisory Board to study county-wide library structure and governance. The first meeting is scheduled for September 17. Supplemental budget: At the City Council meeting of August 19, the Librarian pre- sented an allocation plan for WCCLS funds for FY 1985-86. Council voted not to approve the plan pending more information on the furnishings estimate and the amount of library operating funds that could be returned to the City's general fund. During the spring budget sessions the budget committee had approved $183,000 from the general fund to operate the library at a continuing level of service in FY 1985-86 with the understanding that this figure would be reduced if WCCLS funds became available pending a May levy. The allocation plan provided for a return of $15,000. Weeding: The entire non-fiction collection, adult and juvenile,' was weeded in pre- paration for the WCCLS automation project. The county union list will be sent to a company that puts the list into a data base format for the new computerized circula- tion system. It is important that only items appropriate to the collection be entered because of the cost ($3.00 an item) and effective use of computer space, Personnel: Following recruitment and interviews, Kathy Davis was hired as young people's librarian. Kathy will work 30 hours a week. Kathy worked at the library from 1976 until 1981 as children's librarian and as part-time aide while attending Portland State University from 1981 to 1983. Thirty-two volunteers gave a total of 246.75 hours; 9.14 daily average; staff time, 2 hours. Three community service assignees worked 12.5 hours; daily average 46 minutes; total staff time 35 minutes. Library Board did not have a monthly meeting, however, four members attended City Council meeting on August 19. Work Indicators: August 1985 August 1984 Adult Materials 5914 5806 Juvenile Materials 3743 3233 TOTAL 9657 9039 Days of Service 22 23 Average Daily Circulation 439 393 Increase/Decrease Circ +12% -24% Reference/Reader's Advisory 290 278 Storytime (Sessions) 52 (3) 59 (5) Special Programs (Sessions) 35 (1) 134 (4) Materials Added/Withdrawn. 358/125 481/797 Borrowers: New/Renewal 160/128=288 128/125=253 Youth Services: The Monster Madness summer reading program concluded with a party at Cook Park. Approximately 150 children participated in the program throughout the summer. I rl:l1H1), UKI (f)N UDUNClI AGE_NOA ITEM SUf1MARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM ------ , DATE SUBMITTED: October 22,1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: HOP 17-85, 9zeldon Scolar SDR 29-$4, Cite of Tigard PREPARED BY: rommunitl Deveit REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT iiEAO OK: ��K'�' -- CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the HOP 17-85 for Sheldon Scc+lar, and SDR 29-84 for the City of Tigard: 1, HOP 17-85, Sheldon H. Scolar for a Home Occupation Permit for a consulting business in water treatment and formulizing on property zoned R-4.5 %at 14725 SW 79th Avenue. 2. SDR 29-84 for the City of Tigard to delete and change certain conditions which were attached to the approval of a site design review to allow construction of a new City Hall, Library and Police Department, located 200 feet south of SW Burnham on the west side of Hall Blvd. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED ACTION j Receive and file. `n i .nom t CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOME OCCUPATION HOP 17-85 APPLICATION: A request by Sheldon H. Scolar for a Home Occupation Permit for a consulting business in water treatment and formulizing on property zoned R-4.5. Located at: 14725 S.W. 79th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1280 Lot 2700). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City .of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information Properties adjacent to the lot directly to the north, west, and south, are all zoned R-4.5 except the easterly lot #1300, across the street is zoned R-7(PD). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is an 1800 square foot home on the property. The applicant is' proposing to use 250 square feet for the business. The applicant will occupy the remainder of the home. The business use as proposed will not occupy more than 12%.of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO #5 will be notified of the Director's Decision and will have the right to appeal. 8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 17-85 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the home in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home. 2. Therm shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the promises. NOTICE OF DECISION - HOP 17-85 - 'PAGE 1 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in conjunction with the business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6. There- shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant 6 owners XX Owners of record within the required distance YX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Ai( Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON October 31, 1985, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECCRDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 2:30 P.M. October 31. 1985. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639--4171. 10/21/85 Willi A. Monahan, ire or of Plannin�& OQ�veloW�ent DATE APPROVED (KSL:br/2013P) NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 17-85 PAGE 2 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 29-84 APPLICATION: A request by the City of Tigard to delete Conditions 3 and 5 and modify Conditions 6, 7 and 8 which were attached to the approval of a site design review to, allow construction of a new City Hall, Library and Police Department. The property is zoned CBD and is located 200 feet south of SW Burnham on the west side of Hall Blvd. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2DA Tax Lot 400). The findings and conclusions on which the DirectQr- based his decision are as noted below: DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above described application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background On February 7, 1985 the Director of Planning and Development approved a Site Design Review and Minor Land Partition application with conditions. On March 11, 1985, the City of Tigard Hearings Officer approved a Sensitive Lands Permit request with conditions. The Sensitive Lands Oermit allowed the placement of approximately 76 cubic yards of fill within the 100 year floodplain of Fanno Creek. 2. Vicinity Information The property is located on the west side of Hall Blvd. and north of Fanno Creek. All the adjacent properties on the west side of the street are also zoned CBD and are partially developed. The land east of Hall Blvd. is zoned I-L (Light Industrial) I-L (Light Industrial) and is used by a bus company. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description Construction of the new Civic Center facility is currently underway. The contractor estimates the project will be completed in late January of 1986. The City is attempting to form an L.I.D. for street improvements along Hall Blvd. Assuming the L.I.D. is formed, the street improvements would be completed in the spring of 1986. To accomodate the timing of the L.T.D., some of the original conditions attached to the approval of the Site Design Review need to be modified. 4. Agency and NPO Comments No comments have been received regarding this proposal. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 29-84 PAGE 1 ` B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The L.I.D. , as proposed, plans for SW Hall Blvd. to be improved on both sides from SW Burnham south to SW O'Mara Street all at once instead of in a piecemeal fashion as development occurs. Constructing the improvements as one project is beneficial to the community as a whole because piecemeal street improvements can be detrimental to the overall traffic circulation system. C. DECISION The Planning Director modifies the conditions attached to the approval of SDR 29-84 and MLP 4-84 as follows: 1. DELETE Condition #3 which reads: 413. Five (5) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be subt.-iitted to the Engineering Section for approval." 2. DELETE Condition #5 which reads: "5. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has approved public improvement plans. The Section may require posting of a 100% Performance Bond and the payment of a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a state street opening permit shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the acknowledgment of City-approved public improvement plans." 3. MODIFY Condition #6 to read: 1*6. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the public along the Hall Blvd. frontage to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the right-of-way centerline as established by the City of Tigard. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section prior to the issuance of Occupancy Permits." 4. MODIFY Condition #7 to read: 117. Joint use and maintenance agreements shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. Said agreements shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel deeds. Said agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Section prior to issuance of the Occupancy Permits." NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 29-84 -- PAGE 2 5. MODIFY Condition #8 to read: T "8. An amended site plan shall be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to approval of Occupancy Permits which includes the following: a. A minimum of 54 standard parking spaces (9 x 18 feet). The remaining spaces may be designated for compacts (8-1/2 x 15 feet). b. A minimum of 5 secure bicycle rack spaces located near the main entrance. The rack location and design shall also be approved by the Director." This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: _ XXX The applicant & owners XXX Owners of record within the required distance XXX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XXX Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL 9E FINAL ON October 28, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this, decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. 10/28/85 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Sox 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. October 18, 1985 - - lliam A. Monahan, Director lanning 6Development DATE APPROVED (KSL:br/2012P) NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 29-84 - PAGE 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF. October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: / DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Director's Decision ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Community dated October 24 1985 Decelopment Land Use Decisions PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: William A. Monahan DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the final decision for Home Occupation Permits, HOP 16-85, Quinn Arave; HOP 18-85, Frederick & Neida Crane; HOP 20-85, Melvin & Judith Waymire; HOP 21-85, Frank & Erika Raab; HOP 22-85, Allen Baumer and Ben Franklin. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda - Motion to call up for Council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED_ HCTi0A1 Receive and file. 1O00P/dmj t . CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 16-85 APPLICATION: A request by Quinn D. Arave for a Home Occupation Permit for a home building construction business on property zoned R-4.5. Located at: 12270 SW Summercrest (WCTM ISI 34CB Lot 3000). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above proposal subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information The surrounding property is all zoned and developed R-4.5 (Single Family Residential). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 2852 square foot home on the property. The applicant is, proposing to use 301 square feet for the business. The applicant and family will occupy the remainder of the home. The business use as proposed will not occupy more than 25% of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO Ail will be notified of the Director's decision and will have the right to appeal. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 16-85 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the home in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home. NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 16-85 — PAGE 1 k _ t MOW 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coining to the residence in conjunction with the business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant & owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization �X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November 4, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS' FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. November 4, 1985. 4. uestions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall. 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. -10-24-85 _ 7QW5;:O�. Monahan, Direct�®rof Planning & Development DATE APPROVED (OAS:0/2021P) NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 16-85 PAGE 2 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 18-85 APPLICATION: A request by Frederick T. and Naida L. Crane for a Home Occupation Permit, for a painting contracting business on property zoned R-2. Located at: 11455 Sw Bull Mountain Road (wCTM 2S1 IOAC' Lot 1500). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on 'which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information The surrounding property is all zoned R-2. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 2000 square foot home on the property. The applicant is proposing to use 144 square feet for the business. The applicant and family will occupy the remainder of the home. The business use as proposed will not occupy more than 14% of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO 03 will be notified of the Director's decision and will have the ,right to appeal. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Coda. C. DECISION . Home Occupation Permit HOP 18-85 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the hone in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the how. NOTICE OF DECISION—HOP 18-85 PAGE 1 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior i, of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence conjunction with the business. in 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6• There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one decision date noted below. Year of the final 0. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was Hall Published in the newspaper, os and mailed to: P ted at City X The applicant & owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning X Affected governmental agencies Organization 2• Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November 4 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS, FILED. 3. A eal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance With Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which filed with the CITY RECORDER providesthat 10 daysafternoitten tice is must be and sent. given The deadline for filing of an appeal is w:30 P.M. November 419 4• 85. estions• If You have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 Sw Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639--4171. W �'s-z--- A• Monahan, Director of Plan ning & Development 10-24-85 (DAS:pm/2021P) GATE APPROVED NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 18-85 — PAGE 2 Ev NW f CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 20--85 APPLICATION: A request by Melvin and Judith Waymire for a Home Occupation Permit for office space for a construction business on property zoned R-3.5. Location: 9725 SW Murdock (WCTM 2S1 118D Lot 2900). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have beer. reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information The surrounding property is all zoned and developed R-3.5. (Single Family Residential). t 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 1600 square foot home on the property. The applicant is proposing to use 400 square feet of the business. The applicant and family will occupy the remainder of the home. The business use as proposed by the applicants will not occupy more than 25% of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO ##6 will be notified of the Director's decision and will have the right to appeal. 8. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 20-85 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the home in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home. A NOTICE OF DECISION - HOP 20-85 PAGE I 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in conjunction with the business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant & owners X fawners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November 4,_1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal, Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sant. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. November 4, 1985. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. 10-24-85 William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE APPROVED (DAS:pm12021P) r"=. 7 is NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 20-85 — PAGE 2 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 21-85 APPLICATION: A request by Frank and Erika Raab for a Home Occupation Permit for a Home Repairs and Remodeling business office on property zoned R-12 (Residential 12 units/acre). Located at: 15630 SW 79th (WCTM 2S1 12CD Lot 1800). DECISION: Notice is he. eby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information The surrounding property is all zoned R-12 (Multi-Family ( Residential). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is an approximately 1400 square foot home on the property. The applicant is proposing to use 100 square feet for the business. The applicant and family will occupy the remainder of the home. The business use as proposed will not occupy more than 25% of the home. 4. Agency and MPO Comments NPO $5 will be notified of the Director's decision and will have the right to appeal. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 21-85 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the home in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home. NOTICE OF DECISION - HOP 21-85 -- PAGE 1 x In 0 I'll 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in conjunction with the business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: _ X The applicant & owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X J Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL. BE FINAL ON November 4, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL_ IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. November 4, 1985. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. 10-24-85 William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE APPROVED (DAS:pm/2021P) k 1 i 21-85 PAGE 2 NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP - � . i ; r CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION HOP 22-85 APPLICATION: A request by Allen Baumer and Ben Franklin for a Home Occupation Permit for an office and parking space associated with Allen's Mobile Auto Repair on property zoned R-12. Located at: 7962 SW Churchill (WCTM 2S1 12CD Lot 6000). DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above application subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. Background No previous applications have been reviewed by the Planning Department on this property. 2. Vicinity Information The surrounding property is all zoned R-12 (Multi-Family Residential). f 3. Site Information and Proposal Description There is a 1200 square foot home on the property. The applicant is proposing to use 200 square feet for the business. The business use as proposed will not occupy more than 25% of the home. 4. Agency and NPO Comments NPO #5 will be notified of the Director's decision and will have the right to appeal. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposal meets the provisions set forth in Chapter 18.142 of the Tigard Municipal Code. C. DECISION Home Occupation Permit HOP 22-85 is approved subject to the fallowing conditions: 1. There shall be no people working in the honz in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home. NOTICE OF DECISION - HOP 22-05 - PAGE 1 2. There shall be no signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises. 3. There shall be NO customers or clients coming to the residence in conjunction with the business. 4. The Home Occupation Permit shall be renewed annually. 5. A Business Tax shall be paid annually for the business. 6. There shall be no noise emitted from the home connected with the business which is audible to abutting residences. 7. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant & owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON November, 4, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL. IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. November 4, 1985. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. i• '.�G.^�:''v 6'6�fr �. 10-24-85 Willia A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE APPROVED (OSA:pm12021P) NOTICE OF DECISION — HOP 22-85 — PAGE 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON w COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 41 AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: — DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985_ PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Bud et Committee Discussions 3/27/85 Approve Bid Call for Compute _ r PREPARED BY: Joy Martin 6 User Com. is S stem REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK. �'Z+^- CITY ADMINIS'T'RATOR M POLICY _ISSUE Local Contract Review Board, requires Ordinance Na. 85-05 relating to the public contracts over $15,000 to be approved by Council. As the first step { a contract the City has prepared a Request for Proposal prior to approving a (RFP) for the computer system according to the Rules. It has been common practice for Council to approve the bid call prior to the date set for RFP's to be available to vendors and prior to advertising. ~ INFORMATION SUMMARY The computer system has been discussed at the Budget Committee meetings early this year and Dr. Don Springer completed his needs assessment report to the Committee on March 27, 1985. Money was set aside in contingency to go towards purchasing a city-wide system following responses on an RFP. An RFP has been prepared following closely the Needs Assessment Report, Plus adding contract language, bid forms, mere detail on system requirements, and a l units intended to be purchased initially. reduction in the number of periphera of Contents of the RFP, the first page Attached is the Notice, the Table Events, the summary evaluation criteria and the shaving the Schedule of s. The Specifications. The City Attorney advantagewing of reduced priis theaces ct which often current timeline will us the occurs during December before the year end. It is important the draft RFP is not released to any selected vendor before it is available to all vendors. If one is given an unfair advantage, the process could be challenged and the City would be held responsible. Because of this and since the RFP is still being reviewed at the time packets are being prepared, the complete draft is not in the packets. If anyone desires to see portions of the draft not attached, please contact me prior to Monday night. the timeline if Council or staff desires Changes can be made without impacting after the Call for Bids in an addenda. Of course, Council has a right to reject any or all bids at the time of purchase request. C City of Tigard - Computer RFP Approve Bid Call for Computer System Agenda of October 28, 1985 r Page 2 1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the call for bids for the computer system. which adjusts the Schedule of Events to 2. Not approve the call for bid, purchase in January or beyond. SUGGESTED ACTION Approval to Call for Bids on the City of Tigard Data Processing Hardware and Software. (0929p) a t S i 3 E i E: s i` e T E E E " i i1 City of Tigard — Computer RFP (0929p) 44P CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE October 31, 1985 rp, NOTICE TO PROSPECTIIFE BIDDERS Sealed bids for data processing hardware and softwareT ard.will tb12755$tried Ash Doris Hartig, City Purchasing Agent for the City Avenue, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, no later than 3:00 PM, Monday, December 2. 1985, at which time the bids will be publicly opened and read. ived Under no circumstance will any bid be b�dsem►eisttbet clearly is ema kedf after 3-00 for PM on Monday. December 2, 1985. Sea _ City of Tigard Data Processing b bid 4securire nty inf t erform of a proposal cert fid check considered unless accompanied Y of or a bid bond in an amount equal to ten percent (10%)iddinghper d atthe Bidding documents for the work are available Tigadurrd, Oregon All bids must be City of Tigard, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue, Tigard. submitted on forms provided in the bidding document. of Tigard may reject any bid not in Pursuant to ORS 279.035, the City procedures and requirements and may compliance with all prescribed bidding p Council, it is in the public reject all bids if, in the judgment of the City interest to do so. j ,ht tj SS 1 ter RFP �' City of Tigard — Gompu .. TABLE OF CONTENTS f., 1 page number NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 PART 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS 5 SECTION 1.1 PURPOSE 5 SECTION 1.2 POINT OF CONTACT 5 SECTION 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK AND CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS 5 SECTION 1.4 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 5 SECTION 1.5 ADDENDA TO THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 6 SECTION 1.6 PROTEST ON BIO SPECIFICATIONS 6 SECTION 1.7 RESPONSE DATE 6 SECTION 1.8 VENDORS' PROPOSALS 6 SECTION 1.9 MULTIPLE PROPOSALS 6 SECTION 1.10 PROPOSAL PREPARATION 6 SECTION 1.11 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL CONTENT 7 SECTION 1.12 PRICE QUOTATION IN PROPOSAL 7 SECTION 1.13 LEASE, PURCHASE, OR FINANCE DECISION 7 SECTION 1.14 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS 7 SECTION 1.15 PRIME CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES 8 SECTION 1.16 FOREIGN CONTRACTORS 8 SECTION 1.17 PUBLIC RECORDS 8 SECTION 1.18 ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 8 PART 2 CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS 9 SECTION 2.1 GENERAL 9 SECTION 2.2 PERFORMANCE SECURITY 9 SECTION 2.3 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES 9 SECTION 2.4 EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE RELIABILITY 10 SECTION 2.5 STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE 11 SECTION 2.6 PATENT AND COPYRIGHT' PROTECTION 12 SECTION 2.7 RISK OF LOSS OR DAMAGE (Leased Equipment) 12 SECTION 2.8 RISK OF LOSS OR DAMAGE (Purchased Equipment) 13 SECTION 2.9 CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY FOR INJURY TO PERSONS OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY 13 SECTION 2.10 TAXES - FEDERAL AND LOCAL 13 SECTION 2.11 NON-APPROPRIATION CLAUSE 13 SECTION 2.12 SYSTEMS WARRANTY 14 SECTION 2.13 PRODUCT SUPPORT 14 SECTION 2.14 SEVERABILITY 14 SECTIOaN 2.15 WAIVER 14 SECTION 2.16 INDEPENDENT STATUS OF CONTRACTOR 15 SECTION 2.17 FAILURE TO PERFORM 15 SECTION 2.18 RIGHT TO INTERFACE 15 SECTION 2.19 CANCELLATION 15 SECTION 2.20 ESTABLISHED PRODUCTS 15 SECTION 2.21 SOFTWARE STATUS 15 SECTION 2.22 LIMITATION OF REMEDIES 16 City of Tigard - Computer RFP 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page number 17 PART 3 INFORMATION REQUIRED FROM VENDORS 17 SECTION 3.1 GENERAL 18 SECTION 3.2 HARDWARE 18 SECTION 3.3 SOFTWARE 18 SECTION 3.4 VENDOR SUPPORT 20 SECTION 3.5 FINANCIAL 20 SECTION 3.6 BENCHMARK/DEMONSTRATION 20 SECTION 3.7 FORMS 21 PART 4 THE ORGANIZATION 21 SECTION 4.1 THE CITY OF TIGSYSTEMSECTION 4.2 DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 24 SECTION 4.3 INVENTORY OF CURRENT RESOURCES 26 SECTION 4.4 RESPONSE FORMAT AND CONTENTS 26 HARDWARE 27 SOFTWARE 28 VENDOR SUPPORT 29 TERMS AND PRICING 29 BUSINESS DESCRIPTION 30 REFERENCES 30 DATA ORGANIZATION 30 t COMMUNICATIONS 30 t MICROCOMPUTERS 30 OTHER MATERIAL 31 SECTION 4.6 EVALUATION CRITERIA 31 HARDWARE 32 SOFTWARE 32 APPLICATIONS 33 SUPPORT 35 PART 5 SPECIFICATIONS 35 SECTION 5.1 ACCOUNTING SYSTEM 35 INTENTION 35 GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 35 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 35 CASH RECEIPTS 36 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 36 PURCHASES/ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 37 PAYROLL 37 JOURNAL ENTRIES 37 GENERAL LEDGER 37 FIXED ASSETS 38 BUSINESS TAX 38 MUNICIPAL COURT 38 PROPERTY CONTROL 38 VOLUME INFORMATION 3 City of Tigard - Computer RFP TABLE OF CONTENTS page number SECTION 5.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM 39 INTENTION 39 GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 39 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 39 PROPERTY MASTER FILE 39 LAND USE APPLICATION PROCESSING AND FILE MANAGEMENT 40 PERMIT PROCESSING AND FILE MANAGEMENT 40 MAPPING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 41 DESIGN ENGINEERING/SURVEYING AND PUBLIC FACILITY SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 42 FLEET MANAGEMENT A2 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FILE MANAGEMENT 43 CIDE ENFORCEMENT FILE MANAGEMENT 44 PUBLIC (CAPITAL) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FILE MANAGEMENT 45 VOLUME INFORMATION 45 SECTION 5.3 POLICE SYSTEM 46 INTENTION 46 GENERAL, SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 46 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 46 VOLUME INFORMATION 48 SECTION 5.4 POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION 49 INTENTION 49 GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS A9 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 49 ELECTRONIC SPREADS4EET 49 REPORT WRITER 49 SPECIALIZED CITY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE 50 SECTION 5.5 WORD PROCESSING SYSTEM 51 INTENTION 51 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 51 SECTION 5.6 LIBRARY 53 SECTION 5.7 PROPOSED TERMINAL NUMBERS AND LOCATION 54 PART 6 APPENDIX BID FORM 1 SUMMARY BID FORM 2 SOFTWARE SYSTEM COMPARISON BID FORM 3 RECOMMENDED HARDWARE CONFIGURATION BID FORM 4 RECOMMENDED SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION BID FORM 5 FUTURE CONFIGURATION TABLES 1. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART BY FUNCTION 22 2. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART BY POSITION 23 3. SUMMARY OF CURRENT RESOURCES 25 f 4. SUMMARY OF SYSTEM EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS 34 4 City of Tigard — Computer RFP REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4 DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PART 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1.1 PURPOSE The Request for Proposals (RFP) will provide interested vendors with sufficient information to enable them to prepare and submit proposals for consideration by the City of Tigard. The contract, if awarded, is to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. It is the City's intent to select the most cost-effective proposal based on our evaluation of responses. Consistent with the provisions of the bid documents, awards are made in the public interest as determined by the City. The City's RFP purchasing procedures are in accordance with the Local Contract Review Board Rules adopted by City of Tigard Ordinance No. 85-05 with the intent to carry out the State laws to ensure a fair and open contracting process. SECTION 1.2 POINT OF CONTACT Questions pertaining to this RFP should be directed to Donna Corbet, Executive Secretary, City of Tigard, phone (503)639-4171. Questions must be in writing. If appropriate, responses will be in writing and mailed to all bidders as an addendum prior to bid opening. SECTION 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK AND CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS This RFP contains the instructions and requirements pertaining to the proposals to be submitted. The Vendor is responsible for all portions of the RFP, including the Notice, General Conditions, Contract Terms and Conditions, System Description, Specifications, Appendices including Bid Forms, and Addenda: These documents shall become part of the Contract should acquisition be made. The contract will consist of an Owner-Vendor Agreement (which shall be in a form acceptable to the City of Tigard), the Vendor's proposal, Executed Bid, Insurance Certificates, and any and all Modifications issued after execution of the Contract. The selected vendor will be expected to enter into the contract terms and conditions included within this RFP. At the time of bid submission, vendors must either indicate verbatim acceptance of the contract terms and conditions ' or, if exception is taken, list areas of exception and include specific i language proposals for those provisions to which exception is taken. Nonsubstantive or procedural changes are the areas which may be noted with ; exceptions. Failure to respond will result in the disqualification of the vendor. SECTION 1.4 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS The schedule of events for this RFP is as follows: 1. RFP available at City Hall Thursday, October 31, noon 2. Last Date to Submit Questions Monday, November 25, noon 3. Last Date Addenda can be Issued Friday, November 29, 1985 4. Bid Closing and Opening of Sealed Bids at City Hall Monday, December 2, 3:00 pm 5. Selected System Demonstrations December 9 - December 13 6. Contract Awarded by City Council Monday, December 16, 1985 7. Delivery and Installation Monday, March 17, 1986* *or 90 days after ordered, whichever is greater 5 City of Tigard - Computer RFP y Table 2. SUMMARY OF SYSTEM EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS General Desirable Category Criteria Value Hardware Reliability 3 Availability of parts 1 Availability of new equipment 1 Throughput per dollar 2 Communications-orientation 2 Compatibility 2 Ease of upgrade 2 Modularity 2 Software Reliability 2 Availability 5 Data Management 4 Execute Time 1 Documentation 2 Modularity 2 Ease of use 4 Application Availability 6 Scope 4 User's library 2 Modularity 3 Ease of modification 6 Documentation 6 Conversion time 3 Support Education 10 Routine 1 Consulting 9 High level cons. 1 Responsiveness 10 Proximity 3 Sales/relation 1 d us, City of Tigard - Computer RFP � _ 34 PART 5 SPECIFICATIONS f� SECTION 5.1 ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS A. INTENTION It is the intent and purpose of the Finance Department to streamline the accounting and budgetary systems of the City. The software the department is seeking will accomodate this purpose. The City of Tigard currently has the following programs in the Finance and Services Department: Accounts Payable Payroll Sewer Billing Fixed Assets Cash Receipts Municipal Court General Ledger Business Tax The department is also responsible for the word processing center, which is currently a WANG OIS system. The new data processing system should interface with the current Wang OIS system. The Vendor may decide to replace the OIS system with another system. This will be considered if it is shown to be equal to or better than the OIS system. The system requirements for word processing are upgrades in terminals, additional terminals and additional printers. A description of the OIS word processing is in Section 5.6. B. GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Each of the elements of the accounting and budgetary systems must allow for multi-operator input. Wherever possible, data should only be entered once in the system. The systems must allow for historical data from 1 to 3 years. Reports must be easy to format. The systems must be accessible to other departments, but with conditions. The system must allow for multi-users without slowing it down. C. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The Finance Department has need for updated software to accomplish accounting, budgetary, business tax and municipal court functions. Entries into the general ledger come from four major sources: cash receipts, purchases, payroll and journal entries. The software we are eking will need to concentrate on updating the general ledger simultaneously as cash, purchases, payroll and journal entries are posted. The business tax and municipal court systems are separate systems. The municipal court reporting does tie into the general ledger. 1. Cash Receipts Cash receipts are written for actual dollars received and deposited by the City. The receipt has all of the information necessary to update revenues and in the case of receivables; the information to update customer accounts. It is our intent that the information need only be entered into the system once. A pre--posting report of each day's cash receipts should be generated. Once this report is balanced, the 35 City of Tigard - Computer RFP receipts can be posted with simultaneous updating of general ledger accounts and subsidiary customer accounts. As each receipt is entered a verification of the general ledger account number and a subsidiary account number will be made. If either number is incorrect, the system will stop. 2. Accounts Receivable There are three basic types of accounts receivable in the City. Utilities, assessments and miscellaneous. The system will have to generate billings for each one. a. The utilities have three kinds of billing—sewage treatment, sewer line maintenance and storm drainage. The utilities are currently billed quarterly, but the system should allow for monthly billing. The utilities are billed on one bill, although they affect different general ledger account numbers. There are four accounts receivable accounts. The sewage treatment is billed in one amount, but is divided into two accounts, 70% to a payable and 30% to a revenue. The other two are to revenue. Within the utilities are various types of customers who are treated differently for billing purposes. The software will need to accomodate these variances. A two to three year history is desirable. b. Assessments can be bonded or unbonded. They normally are billed semi-annually with simple interest. Through legislative and other changes, some accounts are billed more frequently. Each assessment has different terms and different interest rates. History of the entire assessment must be kept. c. Miscellaneous receivables are billings for overtime, damages, etc. and are done on an as needed basis. A one year history should be sufficient for these kind of receivables. 3. Purchases/Accounts Payable Purchases are made by purchase orders in most cases. There are payments made for items by check request and VISA as well. The payment system for the City should allow for these various types of expenditures. Currently, the purchase orders are entered into an encumbrance system for budgetary purposes. Although an encumbrance system is not totally necessary, a good accounts payable system is. The system should have the following features: multi-operator input, a pre-posting report, deferred payment of entered invoices, a delayed check write and simultaneous posting to the general ledger. The system should allow for cane-time vendors, indicate vendors who are subject to 1099 reporting and prepare the 1099's. On data entry the general ledger account number is to be verified before continuuing. There should be at least 13 periods to allow for year-end closing. City of Tigard - Computer RFP 36 4. Payroll With the implementation of FLSA, the City may have several pay periods. The City will have both hourly and salaried employees. The system will have to meet the record keeping requirements of FLSA, accrue sick leave, vacation and holidays. The payroll checks will have printed on them the accumulated sick leave, vacation etc. and a report for management will be prepared. The system will need to compute overtime, comp. time, retirement and other reports as well as deductions. The system will automatically update employee files. general ledger and accruals. A pre-posting report, verification of general ledger accounts on input, delayed check write and simultaneous posting to the general ledger are required. The City currently has four different retirement plans the system will need to accommodate. S. Journal Entries Journal entries are made on a daily basis and should be entered as such. Verification of general ledger accounts on input, pre-posting reports and simultaneous posting to the general ledger and subsidiaries are required. 6. General Ledger The general ledger is the main system of the City's transactions and is the source of all its financial reports. The budgetary system runs parallel to the general ledger. The reporting structures from the general ledger should be on several levels—section, division, department, program and audit. GAAFR and GAAP formating for audit reports is essential. Trial balances are required on an as needed basis, as well as on a monthly basis. Three years information is required. The budgetary system is distinct from the accounting system. The budget is adopted in July of each year, but adjustments are made during the year. The system should accommodate these adjustments. The system for reporting purposes must tie into the general ledger system for comparisons with actual revenues and expenditures. 7. Fixed Assets Entries into the fixed assets system will be from the purchases and journal entry systems and will tie to the general ledger. The system will be required to compute depreciation, keep separate records by item and total to the general ledger grand objects. The system need not be on line at all times, however the accounts payable system will need to update the files when posting. s 37 Citic of Tigard - Computer RFP 8. Business Tax The business tax system is a record keeping and information gathering program. It must accommodate up to 2,500 businesses, re certificates to be displayed by the businesses, and pre prepare tax for other de Aare reports annual other depgs toartments that businesses he asydstem should generate automatic appropriate generate second notices with A penalties included. 9. Municipal Court The Municipal Court system tracks the citations written by the police department from date of citation through clearance date. The system will generate trial and arraignment dockets. In addition, the system is required to keep statistical information for use by the police department, the accounting department for the State and the court clerk for the State. The cash receipts systeti: ..:_.ld tie into this program to show paid citations. Reports should be easy to format. Again multi-operator input is necessary. Two years data for historical purposes is necessary. 10. Property Control The City is required to keep track of all purchases of equipment items. Those that are over $500 are tracked through the fixed assets system. The items that are less than $500 need to be identified and kept track of through a property control system. The system would ` include a description of the item, the vendor, approximate purchase date and the location of the item. Entries would be made to transfer location, delete if no longer useable, etc. 0. Volume Information Annual/Current 5 Year Projection Sewer/storm drainage customers 19,500 Cash receipts 25.000 Accounts6,500 12,000 payble vendors 300 500 Checks/frequency (weekly) 3,000 5,000 Payroll # employees 85 125 N Payroll checks (semi-monthly) 2,750 4,000 Business taxes 1,500 21500 Court 4,800 10,000 Property control -O- 50,000 General ledger accounts 3,000 101000 4 City of Tigard - Computer RFP 38 SECTION 5.2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SYSTEM A. INTENTION It is the intent of the Community Development Department to automate mapping information, file management and streamline the processing of Land—Use applications and permits. The department consist of four divisions; namely Planning, Engineering, Building, and Public Works Operations. Land development progresses through each division with various applications and permits being required. File and mapping information cores into all division. Currently the Department has Holguin and Associates software and Wang hardware for some Engineering functions only. B. GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS The department seeks an on—line system capable of multi—user input and output. Over ninety percent of the information handled and processed by the department relates to a geographic location. The department desires to automate both mapping information and conventional file data and have the two interact with one another when processing and reading data. The major component of the system is a Property Master File in which all prior, current and future property parcels will reside on the system and be identified and cross referenced by address, tax lot and/or conventional file designation. C. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The following is a general outline of the software applications and components required. These requirements include both conventional file and mapping information data. 1. Property Master File 2. Land-Use application processing and file managment 3. Permit processing and file management 4. Mapping information management 5. Design Engineering/Surveying and Public Facility Systems analysis 6. Fleet Management 7. Public Works Operations file management 8. Code Enforcement file management 9. Public Improvemnt Project File Management (L.I.D.) F 1. Property Master File t a. Cross reference by address, Tax Lot and Map No. (Washington County) and Application and/or permit No. b. Map sketch and/or mapping information for particular parcel being called up. c. Report data on permit, application and complaint activity (file no. references). d. Deed, easement and other use encumbrances. e. Prior parcel Tax Lot and Map No. t f 2 City of Tigard — Computer RFP 39 m7l 2. Land Use Application Processing and File Management a. Type and file No. b. Property owner notification processing (interface with word processing). c. Correspondence references. d. Property/Parcel/I.D. e. Planning Commission, Hearings Officer, Council and LUBA activity. f. Staff reports and approvals (conditional). g. Ability to add standard report items randomly. 3. Permit Processing and File Management a. Building Permits: The building and inspection control module will be used to maintain records on building history, inspection logs for projects under construction and to perform some forecasting of inspection work loads. The system is required to maintain a descriptive building file and inspection logs for new construction, For each unit in the descriptive building file, the following general information should be kept: - Building permit number - Sewer info: Availability, - Business location address surcharges, date connected, - Mailing address part of L.I.D. - owner's name - Date built - Owner's phone number - Date remodeled - Owner's address - Special comments For each unit in the descriptive building file, the following construction information should be kept: - Fire Sprinkler - Construction type - Fire alarm - Total square feet - Occupancy class - Ground area square feet - Roof construction - Basement square feet - Roof covering - Building height - Wall framing - Number of stories - Exterior finish type - Value - Structure columns - Occupancy square feet For each unit of the inspection logs for new construction the following data need to be input (multiple entries depending on the requirement for construction): - Permit number - Building code standard - Map/tax lot number paragraph numbers of 4 digits - Inspector number - Completed/inspected date for - Description of construction each standard paragraph - Type of inspection - Reinspection date for each - Occupancy class standard paragraph - Date due for each - Comments standard paragraph t City of Tigard - Computer RFP 40 Ability to produce an inspection-pending and -completed reports by inspector number, showing: - Due date - Inspection type - Permit Number - Description of construction - Occupancy class Ability to interface to word processing system to produce standard notification letters to builders. Information to be passed to the word processing file would include: - Business name - Inspection date - Business address, etc. - Standard paragraph number - Owner name - Standard paragraph short - Phone number short description - Inspection type b. Public Improvement Permits - The public improvement permits module will be used to maintain records on the processing of the permit applications. The unit shall include the following: - Type and file number - Plan circulation and approvals - Cross reference to - Public Facility impacts Land-Use applications - Dedications, easements, - Engineers estimate agreements and other legal - Bond type and deadlines document references - Correspondence references - Council activity - Owner/Developer/Engineer information 4. Mapping Information Management The department is currently responsible for a majority of the City's mapping and graphics needs. The primary need is City-wide general information related to land-use, public facilities and transportation. Other needs include specific site mapping for planning purposes, engineered construction drawings and various graphs and charts. Engineering is currently assembling parcel maps geometrically from networked survey data. However, both mathematical and digitized mapping is desired. The primary goal is to obtain a system that not only automates mapping functions but also assist the user with reading and interpreting map information. The department would like to retain its current mapping software (Holguin 6 Associates) for specific engineering, surveying and base mapping needs. However, more flexible software with continuous map and layering capabilities when creating or reading maps is desired. City of Tigard - Computer RFP 41 5. Design Engineering/Surveying and Public Facility Systems Analysis As previously mentioned the Engineering Division currently has a part of a software package produced by Holguin & Associates of E1 Paso, Texas. The package is called Civil Engineering and Automated Design System (C.E.A.D.S.) and currently runs on the City's Wang MVP 2200 hardware system. Engineering has the following software modules included in this C.E.A.D.S. package: 1. Disk Management 2. Field C-ntrol System (Survey) 3. Geometric Design 4. Automated Drafting System 5. Wastewater Collection System Other C.E.A.D.S. software modules that Engineering does not have but would like to obtain (at least obtain the functions) include: 6. Earthwork 7. Other wastewater programs S. Master Design System The Division would ultimately like to expand its computer function into traffic, street inventory and the Corps of Engineers HEC I and HEL II flood plain analysis programs. Due to recent enhancements to this C.E.A.D.S. system and continued �- support by the vendor the Engineering Division would like to retain and expand this software. The Division has also recently considered converting and expanding this software on micro hardware system. With respect to hardware the division will need both a plotter and digitzer capable of producing and digitizing maps 36" X 48" in size. 6. Fleet Management a. Fleet Maintenance Management System - The fleet maintenance system is intended to provide information to plan, schedule and control maintenance of City vehicles, spacial rolling stock (backhoes, etc.) and small motorized tools. The City vehicle fleet is broken into maintenance rotation groups determined by usage — e.g. , police cars are in for maintenance more frequently than cars for general use. Preventive maintenance on all equipment is triggered by the time associated with the rotation group not mileage. When maintenance is performed, all labor hours and parts are charged to a specific budget line of the City department/divisions. The maintenance system should group the costs to pass to the general ledger at month—end closing. City of Tigard — Computer RFP 42 The module needs to by capable of maintaining records for each piece of equipment with the following data: - Equipment number - Contact person - Make - License number - Model - State inspection date - Year - Maintenance group (this - Engine size specifies the rotation - Serial number period before preventive - Department equipment used maintenance is required for in this piece of equipment - Contact person The module needs to be capable of maintaining a maintenance history record for each piece of equipment showing: - Date of work - Cost of labor - Mechanic number - Cost of materials - Mileage - Equipment number - Repair order number - PM flag (if this record was - Work performed description a preventative maintenance The module needs to be capable of producing the following reports: - Preventive maintenance schedule for a user specified date rante. Data printed should include the equipment description data, the department and contact data, and the maintenance group - Equipment maintenance analysis showing all work dans on a specific piece of equipment - Maintenance checklists keyed by maintenance group for each scheduled piece of equipment 7. Public Works Operations File Management The Public Works Operations Division consist of four sections, anmely Wastewater, Streets, Parks and Operations Support. The division is responsible for the operation and maintenance of various public facilities and requires automation with scheduling, equipment and materials and supply inventory. Scheduling needs include: - Street sweeping - Sanitary and Storm line - Brushing program maintenance - Sign maintenance - Street repair - Traffic marking - Equipment needs - Park Maintenance r, City of Tigard - Computer RFP 43 �affis� 8. Code Enforcement File Management There are several types of code violations or nuisances — noxious vegetation, illegal signs, broken sidewalks — against which the City receives complaints. The complaints are logged and a letter is sent to the responsible person, instructing him to remove or repair the nuisance. The recipient has a period of time to do so before the City will do the work and subsequently bill the owner or occupant of the property. A system is needed to maintain complaint records and their disposition, to produce schedules of due dates for work to be done so that City personnel can follow up, and to generate financial entries. In some cases, a contractor will be hired to perform the work and must be padi upon completion. The amount will be billed to the owner or occupant. If the bill is not paid, the amount becomes a lien against the propety. The module needs to maintain complaint records. Data to include: — Date of complaint — Action to be taken: — Name of complainant Notice posted date — Phone Letter sent date — Location of nuisance Date assigned (address) Work performed by — General description Date abated — Map/tax lot number Notice of finance date - Subdivision name Initials responsible Name of owner/occupant — Received—by initials The module needs to be able to produce contractor instruction sheets The module needs to be able to interface with the word processing system to produce standard notification letters to owner/occupant. Data: to be passed is: — Address — Map/tax lot number The module needs to be able to produce schedules by date of actions to be taken: — Sort by letter—sent date — Date assigned — Notice posted date The module needs to be able to produce a listing of liens against properties City of Tigard — Computer RFP 44 9. Public (Capital) Improvement Project File Management These projects are primarily City projects and include Local Improvement Districts. The majority of these projects are perfomed by engineering consultant, however, City engineering staff will perform a few of these projects. The departments greatest need is to automate the processing and tracking of these projects through their various stages. These include file correspondence, Council activity, Consulting Engineering information and mapping information updates. 0. VOLUME INFORMATION Annual/Current 5 Year Proiection Parcels of Land 10,000 14,000 Square Miles 8.5 11.5 Land Use Applications 100 (Annual) 100 1,500 (on file) 2,000 Building Permits 350 (Annual) 300 5,000 (on file) 7,000 (Annual) 40 Public Impr. Permits 40 ( 500 (on file) 750 Public Impr. Design Projects 3 10 (25) on file No. of Public storks Crews 6 10 No, of Vehicles 56 75 t 45 City of Tigard — Computer RFP SECTION 5.3 POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM A. XNTE�NTION # It is the intention of these specifications to set forth sthe ystem- requirements lice information managementstem requirements for the performance of a police stem knowledge and requirements, the In order to demonstrate total system a this package shall consist of bidder shall submit a proposal Pa 9 sample reports. g, GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS It is the desire of the department to purchase a computer system that is a providing total automation of police state-of-the-art computer system records operations from incident entry to statistical management and UCR This system shall rts P re orts including storage of complete ase repo Enforcement DataSystem also be Law and the Oregon Un formle to interface yCrime Reporting System. This system must provide the following benefits: 1• Specifically designed for operation by sworn and clerical personnel. alecords,m dispatch,that lows detectivesta etc,s on-line use in many 2. Multi-termin locations r 3. Instantaneous andsimultaneous access to all system functions from any s terminal in the y 4, Provide numerous types of statistical reports with easy to use and read menus. Oregon Uniform Crime Reporting System. 5. Interface capability with the e Oregon Law Enforcement Data System 6. Interface capability with th (CEOs). 7, UCR reports can be produced immediately and at any g. Blotter reports for public information. g. Security is built in to protect records from unathorized access. C. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION form all information ns This system shall peresystem operator shallretrieval enter infonrmati�on of a law enforcement agency. The stem operation shall be by using a keyboard at a term The system from the interactive. The computer shall prompe to and select t operator. The he variousto s fctions operator shall be ab nus. The system shall provide screen using clear, understandable me 46 City of Tigard - Computer RFP prompts to guide the operator through step—by—step procedures. The system f . shall provide "fill in the blank" screens to enter new data or to update a t file. The operator shall be able to type in the information, verify the 4 entry visually and be able to correct any errors. The system must then print and/or transfer data to all associated files automatically. All data entered must be available instantly to the entire system and to operators in other department locations. Reports shall be able to be made in a variety of ways, including SOUNDER (similar sounding) name searches, and by using combinations of data elements such as a type of car, location, incident, etc. The operator shall be able to record dispatched time, arrival time, cleared time, reporting party name, summary remarks, disposition and dispatcher 10. System shall be used to identify an individual who looks suspicious or is situated in a suspicious location, and will include the following information describing the status of the indicidual: time of contact, driver's license number, description of the vehicle, and physical characteristics of the individual. This will be know as the Field Contact Report. System shall be used to make an evaluation of each crime that occurs and is reported. Data to be entered includes: details of the crime, such as where the crime occurred, how it was reported, and when the crime took place. Names of the victim, reporting party, and witnesses shall be entered, containing the address, age, sex, and race of each. If crime involves a document related incident, data that includes the type of document that was reported and reason it was reported shall be entered. A description of the method of operation that was used in a particular crime shall be entered. Data identifies the location, how and where the suspect entered and left the scene, and the actions that the suspect displayed. Names of suspects involved in a crime are to be entered, to include a complete physical description of each suspect such as race, appearance, hair color, and various other items. A description of a vehicle that was used by the suspect in relation to a crime shall be entered into the system, to include a complete description of the vehicle. The system must be able to process information concerning a vehicle that was abandoned, stolen or recovered. The same information as entered for a crime report shall be able to be entered for a vehicle report. System shall be used to process information concerning an individual who is in custody. Location and time the arrest occurred, a brief description of the arrested individual, and any identifying numbers assigned to the case shall be entered. Charges administered to the arrested subject shall be entered. The arrested subject's vehicle shall be entered, to include description of the vehicle as well as what actions were taken on the E vehicle. t p~ I City of Tigard — Computer RFP 47 The system shall be able to evaluate a piece of property that was stolen, abandoned, recovered. Data to be entered includes whether the loss was due to a -*me or vehicle incident, and gives the victim's name and address whe the incident occured. Descriptions of the pieces of property, ii,cluding item number, size, color, make, and value of each peice shall be entered. The system shall be able to display a list of items in sequence of the item number so that all items that relate to the same incident can be displayed at one time. The system shall be able to identify a case involving a person who is a runaway juvenile, missing person, deceased naturally or by accident, sick or injured, or any other variation that is applicable. Data to be entered shall include information that is required for crime report data entry. 'The system must provide a name index file, whereby inquiries by na.ie reference and incident number reference can be made. The system shall be E able to make quick add entries, and provide a listing of agency identifier codes. The name of anyone entered under any othe program shall be able to be located under this file. Names shall be listed alphabetically ' beginning with whatever name or section of name is entered. This file shall include address, any physical descripters, date of contract, reason for contact, officer making contact, and grid. This file must also be able to inquire an incident number, and screen will display data from this file. This file must include the capability of adding and deleting names. Other system modules to be provided are: IMIS (Investigative management information system) Traffic accident/citation reports Patrol zones and grids This system must be able to interface with other departments within the city to access the following functions: Personnel statistics Budget management Jurisdictional limits, (i.e. roads, city limits) Crime scene drawings Fleet/equipment management Sewer/tax billing D. VOLUME INFORMATION Annual/Current 5—Year—Projections s Name Index File 40,000 125,000 Single Mask Entries 18,500 50,000 s Daily Activity Sheets 26,000 60,000 Statistical Reports 3,000 4,500 Stolen Property Reports 3,888 12,000 Property/Evidence Receipts 15 col.x 5,000 rows 30 col.x 10,000 rows i i f 48 City of Tigard — Computer RFP SECTION 5.4 POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION A. INTENTION The purpose of the applications in policy and administration is to achieve the objectives for (a) increase the productivity of managers in tayloring reports and in producing tables to be used for long-term planning of city resources. The applications will be needed by all departments to some degree, and most specifically for the Administration Department. The specific functions are electronic spread sheets, report writer, and specialized city management software. B. GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Many decisions are based upon resource projections using current and historical trends. The capability for managers and staff with minimal training to quickly tailorize a report form or statistical tables will be useful for project, department and city-wide planning and control. Valuable time is saved if part of the data can be down-loaded from existing finance and word processing fines and up-loaded for printing. The policy and administration applications will largely run independent of the main system in order for the applications to be used on a portable CRT. C. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 1. Electronic Spreadsheet The City Adminsitration Department prepares statistical reports for _ city-wide planning and for decisions by the City Council and the Budget Committee. Department heads and other managers may also use the application to a lesser degree on program revenues, performance measures, and land use and development questions. The data used are largely from budgets, staffing levels, and performance measures. Typically up to five years of historical information is used, two to three current years (proposed, adopted, control), and five to ten future years, The number of line items range from a few up to the number of line items in the budget. Subtotals are made throughout to be selectively used in grand totals. The ability to create variable column widths and to easily change column formats is mandatory. In addition the ability to break away from a table to do a breakdown of a specific item without disturbing the main spreadsheet is needed. 2. Report Writer Management Fsd other staff members often create statistical tables and present in'' =rmation for decisions. To be most effective in producing these specia...zed reports the report writer program must enable staff with a minimum amount of training to create, manage, and produce statistical tables. This or the previous application must also be capable of producing graphs and simple f lowrharts. City of Tigard - Computer RFP 49 3. Specialized City Management Software The International City Managers Association (ICMA) has developed specialized software packages for local governments. The applications are designed to handle a local government application so as to increase productivity and management capacity. The technical requirements are the following: - IBM-PC/XT or PC/AT Fixed-disk microcomputer (or compatible) - MS/DOS (or PC-DOS) operating system, version 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, or 3.1 - Minimum machine memory of 256K (320K for DOS 3.0 or 3.1) - Recommended 10MB fixed disk - Recommended letter-equality printer The programs currently available are the following: - Community Correspondence System - Financial Trend Monitoring System - Public Works Management System - Minute Minder System - Records Management System - Code Administration and Enforcement Training Package f i i City of Tigard - Computer RFP 50 SECTION 5.5 WORD PROCESSING A. INTENTION The City has a centralized word processing support system which means all production jobs are to be done by the word processing section, with two "floater" terminal used by clerical support personnel and others trained for other word processing tasks. B. GENERAL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS The City has a Wang OTS 125 system with four 64K terminals and two printers. The operating system is currently being upgraded to the WP Plus software. There is a need to expand the system to include work for Police and Library once we move into the new civic center. The following System Description gives only the major new features of the WP Plus software. C. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 1. Document Size - "WP Plus" supports widths up to 250 characters horizontally and a maximum document size of 8,000 pages. 2. Column Editing - The column handling capability supports two main types of columns: tabular and word wrapped. Tabular column functions include the ability to insert, delete, move, and copy tabular data within the same columnar table or to another table. "WP Plus" allows for the creation and output of approximately 120 tabular columns. Multiple word-wrap columns and the ability to perform the above mentioned edit operations on those columns are a key part of the "WP Plus" design. 3. Attributes - "WP Plus" features "attributes" or emphasis factors that can be applied to the text. The attributes include underscore, superscript, subscript, bold, double underscore, revision marks, and atrikethru. Operators no longer have to code the document for these features. The attributes will print just as they appear on the screen. They can be assigned as the text is typed or on previously entered text. 4. Split Screen Editing - "WP Plus" features the ability to "split screens" and display a document and an index, or two documents simultaneously. With the split screen capability, it is possible to view, compare and even edit both displayed areas. 5. "UNDO" - "WP Plus" has the ability to "undo" the last editing function completed. Users can easily recall text that was last deleted, moved. copied, inserted or replaced. 6. Extensive Format Line Editing - Just as text can be edited, "WP Plus" format lines can also be edited --- supporting delete, move, copy and insert operations. Format lines can also be named and recalled. allowing "one-time input" and easy recall. Additional special formatting capabilities (implemented through special characters in the format line) include: left margin, center alignment, decimal alignment, comma alignment, hanging indent, and right justification. City of Tigard - Computer RFP 51 r 7. Document View - Documents can be displayed (but not edited) without their control characters. 8. Menus in the Editor - "WP Plus" displays menus, when appropriate, to aid the user in creating or removing emphasis or references to text. 9. Hot Print "WP Plus" allows a document to be queued to print while the user continues to edit/create the document. 10. Spelling Verification/Dictionary - Misspellings are viewed in the context of the document while the system presents the most probable corrections. 11. Computer Based Instruction - An on-line training package enables users to learn "WP Plus" in their own work environment and at their own pace. 12. Document Scrolling - Smooth vertical scrolling by line, screenload or page. 13. Highlighting - Highlighting is supported in both forward and backward directions. lA Comprehensive Search - The "WP Plus search facility supports: searching for multiple text strings; case sensitivity and insensitivity; user-defined starting point; wild card search; backward search; and search parameter recall. 15. Headers and _Footers - "WP Plus" offers headers and footers for single pages, multiple pages, all pages or any combination. 15. Glossary/Decision Processing - Glossary and Decision Processing allow users to store and retrieve commonly used keystrokes and instructions. A host of additional IF tests and features are supported in "WP Plus", including multiple character entry names, on error conditions, get time and date data, etc. 17. File Compatibility - Conversion utilities will be provided in the first release of "WP Plus" to enable documents and glossaries to be moved between the existing WP editor and WP Plus. The utilities provide two-way conversion (to and from the WP Plus document structure. 52 City of Tigard - Computer RFP SECTION 5.6 LIBRARY SYSTEM The City's Library belongs to the Washington County Cooperative Library System (WCCLS) which recently got voter approval on a levy which included an automation system. Their specialized needs relating to their circulation, patron tracking, etc. will be part of this system. t. 53 City of Tigard - Computer RrF SECTION 5.7 PROPOSED COMPUTER TERMINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION A. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Immediate Requirements CRT #1 - Located in Dispatch Area to be used for the Information Storage and Retrieval System primarily, and secondary use of all other police applications. CRT #2 - Located in Investigations Division for primary use of all police applications. CRT #3 - Located in the Records Room Area for use as a floater by all of the Department. Access will be into all police applications. CRT #4 - Located in the Dispatch Area - Services Division for direct access into the city's word processing system and accounting system. CRT #5 (optional) - Located as a floater terminal with accounting, community development systems, the electronic spreadsheet, and report writer functions. Printer #1 - Located in the Dispatch Area - Services Division, intended for specialized printing requiring an immediate hard copy. 2. Five Year Projections - Three additional CRTs for police applications located in the Records Area, Investigations Division, and Patrol Division. B. LIBRARY DEPARTMENT 1. Immediate Requirements CRT #1 - Located in the Work Room Area for access by all trained library staff into the word processing system, limited access into the accounting system, and occasional use of the electronic spreadsheet, and report writer. There may be limited access to the community development system if possible. Printer #1 (optional) - The proximity of the library and the word processing area lends itself to requiring a printer, however, anticipated volume levels will be low therefore there is a desire to minimize cost per printed page. C. FINANCE AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT I. Immediate Requirements CRT 01, #2, and #3 - Located in the Accounting Section for use by all staff in the section using the accounting system. One of these terminals will be responsible for doing back-ups and basic system maintenance. 54 City of Tigard - Computer RFP CRT #4, #5, #6, and #7 - Located in the Support Services - Word _ Processing Section for word processing. Two terminals are dedicated to key production staff in the section, and two are "floaters" for others in the section and in the city. CRT #8 - Located in an area close to the managers and departmenthead which is capable of accessing both the accounting and word processing systems. CRT $9 - Located in the reception area to be used by court with occasional accounting a l wordrpr cessinsgt'sys ems.terminal separate terminals both accou g cannot replace this requirement. }Tinter 01 - Located preferably in the computer room for accounting reports. It needs to be a high volume printer for printing reports, checks and billing statements. Printer #2 and #3 - Located in the word processing area with sound covers. Letter quality, optional dot matrix with high quality, high speed, both continuous feed and single feed capability, capable of using wide paper and printing XXX characters across. Sounds covers required. area, a nt Printer 4 screened for in useheby accounting any ne having a smallprinter question yl a singleon information in the accounting system, _ 2. Five Year Proiections _ One additional CRT which can be used as a floater for both accounting and word processing, and one to two additional printers depending on work volumes in both accounting and word processing. D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. Immediate Requirements CRT #1 - Located in the Building Section to access the community development applications, in particular the permit process and code enforcement programs, CRT #2 and #3 - Located in the Engineering Section to have access into all of the community development applications, in particular the property master file, mapping information, design engineering, and public (c-.,vital), improvements. cess into the CRT #4 Located in the system, anning Sectito have in particular on land usecapplications. communityy development syy CRT 05 - Located in the Public Works Operations area (off-site from the main complex) to have access into the community development system, and rimary are fleet fleetcma agement, publicounting sstem s works Rsible. The p operations, andpublic application l (capital) improvements. 55 City of Tigard - Computer RFP CRT # 6 & T - Located in the Community Development Administration area to be used by administration and clerical staff. Both terminals need to have access into community development and word processing systems, or if that is not possible, one needs to be community development and the other word processing. Preferably, one terminal can also access the accounting system. Digitizer - Located in the Engineering Section. Printer #1 - Graphics printer to be located in the Engineering Section. A noise cover is required. Printer #2 - Located near the counter area, a small printer for printing permits and special forms for applications and permits. Plotter - Located in the Engineering Section. 2. Five Year Proiections - One additional CRT in the Community Development area, and one in the Public Works Operations area, Both to be used as "floaters" accessing the community development system. E. POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION 1. Immediate Requirements CRT #1 - Portable terminal to be used as a stand-alone and terminal connected to both the word processing and accounting systems. The j primary, specialized use of the terminal is the electronic spreadsheet, report writer, and personnel management. It is to be used primarily by administration, and also available to other department heads and key staff. - i City of Tigard — Computer RFP 56 i AR JEW-a CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM N: DATE SUBMITTED: October 23, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Board & Committee Appointments PREPARED BY: Donna Corbet REQUESTED BY: Mayor Cook DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Neighborhood Steering Committee has had a vacant position up to this point and they are recommending Janice Dorr be appointed to the vacancy. The Budget Committee has a vacancy with Wally Hoffman's resignation. The Mayor's Appointments Advisory Committee Haat and are recommending the appointment of Nancy Campbell to the vacancy on the Budget Committee. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Ratify the recommended appointments. ,. (1045p) CITYOF TIGARD CIT14EN COMMITTEE INTEKES1 APPLICATION NAM.. I A � be ` --- 0A 1 F. - AI,uRr:Ss t RLs.� : R"!c� �" � C� (�'�Qea�ct�t3 It� �__r.��Q�R� Rr.::. PutlNr.: ��c�••- 1�{Q�Z-- AUUKLSS (ISUS. )' �'3�{Q `LJI� rnA i #3 �QQtlt� HUN. PHONE: I.LNGTH OF RESIDENCE IN SUGGKSTEU ISY: WIIhkL OLD YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? �pn� ��,- MI-03 Cl Adtaerj) —"Us aP t") 1213. LUULATiONAL BACKGROUND: �,ctdm ��E��k 4 Q 1.s2�n�0"b � Q_i��_. 'l OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: OLL ?t .0 i Ne HOW LUNG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)". PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY:�� \1��:'+G ol\o i,, Lmo ' 1�\C, tc� c Lams&&_d cAhmae t-C e ° (�a r a = t�.�t'�e' m tt,. i1y 0 s e- is 7 EQ��sp tJl+i7��f J�s (J i 9 nQer 1_ ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: �g \, ^u0 RAo_k �!QP[I��' Rmlo I A� i &ooejtY_ftT kl �:CCQ uffi c4(a go,I�C),cs n�T Was h fl Qeaol� O-a v c u x Qe cu k Co Lw.. G,. a.\ OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): )g_�' T'I•E,-J -+W d) \•••came "Iyed Menl� l �w i �a Tis Q ~Tur n n b o i ae rs _,�eso o nAi� �ls�� Y S aw. ve-J& a'48Rcr`4era Q COroS�B.Ned 4.hio Jwr rna i i a%,P -coi�s L3 aei'scr we 6VV- Q t(x ei lu Itl1ARi/ti• talMMi'1"I'r:r.ti OK NI°O IN'i',E+�KES'1'EU IN: �Q(1)p tVL1C -t+,-Ve, poe a . C_Q�fw em Ilat t• Rt•c r i vrti at City Ila l i - (ta l v I ltl t•t v l+w°•.1 11.11.• Ai.t...t Ell Nd __ _.. .-._--. 11.t.11.1• l:n1UN.i 1 1 r.•, .° NI'+ IW.td.- 1 ti Ilul .t.l.• ° tl , RECEIVED CITY®FTI ARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION GC 1 10 1985 clamTIGARU NAME: 1 n n i c,e� I or r DATE: 10 - — �� ADDRESS (RES.): 10a�i0 SLX) KcablF RES. PHONE: (v31-lIo0 ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: w SUGGESTED BY: Ill% Gcoc� uL%S2_ WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY?icj 13 1�, EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: -�e 0 C311biOil rc1� � 1 ,r� ��1� �eh raswi. - �� L-e, -raska t \�� ,,, yvt\�ev'_� ouip OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: 1 (Q% '�� Q(�5Qt2A - �PmgA<4 C h9h'tCAr ?etkL40Gt � YCaY\ -- NOW LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? IS THIS COHPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: 1A sxr,224 ,A pSO tX•r i� . WCAS i3O�u.Y\\.M•r ° ra,�srCf" 0.con� 1y\0AV.ar �.drnu �y- `QAt�sy- yr -44�L DCkS. ra r- 4 r �1� �Tc�ar� J4c ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: (A' f OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REKARKS): BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: ••-"•• "�^ �-^"'� [�1'1}=TC/'P t. ___ ------ -� ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Dote+Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside City Outside City (0346p) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY �f AGENDA OF: October 28 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985_ PREVIOUS ACTION: Received Preliminary ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Engineering Report Hal -- PREPARED L.I.D. PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE To form the local improvemet district to make half street improvements on SIS Hall/Burnham. « INFORMATION SUMMARY The Hall/Burnham LID preliminary engineering report was reviewed by Council on 6/24/85. A decision was made to refer the report to the Transportation Advisory Committee for a recommendation regarding alternative right—of--way improvement standards from center line. The report has been revised based on the 50 ft. road standard adopted by Council on 10/21/85. The Community Development Director has reviewed the project feasibility and recommends the formation of this district. Stuart Cato will be present to answer Council questions and will bring copies of the revised preliminary engineering report to the meeting. A resolution of intent is attached for your review and action. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Accept the revised preliminary engineering report and proceed to the next stage of the LID process: Adoption of a resolution of intent and setting the date for the public hearing. " 2. Alter the recommendation and proceed. 3. Do nothing. SUGGESTED ACTION It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution forming the local improvement district and calling for a public hearing. (DR:br/2036P) d�=tea kp-if consulting engineers octcber 28, 1985 CITY Or TIGARD 12755 Sw Ash Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Project: 85104 RE: S.W. Hall Blvd. Local Street inprovement District Attention: Mr. William Monahan Director of Com unity De%mlopment Gentlemen: We are hereby submitting an update of our June 19th engineering report summarizing our study of the proposed S.W. Hall Blvd. Local Improvement District. The major revision was reducing the improvement width front 56 feet to 50 feet and including a cost for purchasing right-of--Ajay. presented in the attached report are the proposed improvements to S.W. Hall Blvd. £ram the Burlington Northern Railroad crossing south cost o tinter ter line and of S.W. O'Mara Street. Also presented are preliminary assessments for full-street and half-street improvements. Sincerely, �� Sturart L. Cato, P.E. Manager, Civil Engineering SLC:nbc Enc1 5 : 421 sw.6th avenue,suite 911,portland,or 97204(503)227-3251 los angeles portland seattle S.W. Hall Boulevard Local Street Improv-_.ment District Feasibility Study SCOPE OF PRaJECT At the City of Tigard's request, kpff consulting engineers has conducted a feasibility study for a proposed street LID on S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. Burnham Street near the Tigard Civic Center. Both full-street and half-street inprovements were evaluated. The proposed half-street street improvements would begin on the south side of Burnham Street at the northwest corner of Tax Lot 200, Tax Map 2S12DA, which is presently occupied by Tigard Electric Co., and run along the south side of Burnham Street east to Hall Blvd. and then along the west side of Hall Blvd. to the centerline of S.W. O'Mara Street. For the full-street improvement the east side of Hall Blvd. between the Burlington Northern Railroad crossing and O'Mara would also be included. Existing conditions have been defined on S.W. Hall Blvd. and Burnham Street; alternatives have been evaluated for two street alignments, and for street improvement and right-of-way widths; construction quantitites have been estimated and cost estimates prepared for half- and full-street a inprovements; alternative recommendations have been made; and ownership and g land values for property abutting the improved sections of Burnham Street and Hall Blvd. have been determined and a method of assessment proposed. Boundaries have been proposed for the LID and are shown in Appendix A. Runoff calculations have been performed for an area covering O'Mara and Edgewood Streets that may be tributary to a proposed storm drain along the west side of Hall Blvd. They are summarized in Appendix B. S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the S.W. Hall Blvd. Street LID include: o A new centerline alignment through the reverse curves at the intersection of Hall and Burnham, flattening the curves by increasing the radii to 240 feet. o A half-street improvement along the west side of Hall Blvd. and the south side of Burnham Street. o A basic street improvement along Hall Blvd. consisting of a 25-foot wide street section from centerline to curb in a 35-foot vv.Lde right-of-way ' from centerline, which is within City of Tigard standards for an arterial street. o A street improvement along Burnham Street consisting of a 22-foot wide street section from centerline to curb in a 30-foot wide right-of-way { from centerline, which is within City of Tigard standards for a major collector. o An assessment method based 50 percent on front footage and 50 percent cn the area within 200 feet of the proposed right-of-way. o A traffic signal installation at the intersection of Hall Blvd. and Burnham Street. EXISTING CONDITIONS The dedicated right-of-way width on Burnham Street within the proposed LID is 40 feet. The dedicated right-of-way cn Hall Blvd. varies from 40 feet to 60 feet in width. The width of right-of-way from centerline varies on both the east and west sides of Hall Blvd. 011 S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 Page 3 Currently the width of the improvements on Hall Blvd. varies from a minimum of 22 feet to a maximum of 42 feet between the Burlington Northern railroad crossing and O'Mara Street, with two traffic lanes. The street inprove- ments are widest through the S-curve in the vicinity of the intersection with Burnham and narrowest south of the Fanno Creek bridge. There is an existing curb and storm drain system on the east side along Tax Lots 100 (Ager Foods) and 501 (Dorsey Bus). All the catch basins on the east side of Hall are silted in and the size of pipe and direction of flow are not known. There is also an existing storm drain along the west side of Hall Blvd. It begins at a ditch inlet north of Burnham Street, detours 40 feet up Burnham to join a storm drain along the north side of Burnham, crosses Burnham to join a storm drain on the south side of Burnham, then returns to Hall Blvd., where it outfalls in a ditch near the proposed driveway to the Civic Center. Burnham Street improvements are currently 30 feet wide and consist of two traffic lanes and a bike lane on the south side of the street. Problems with the existing street improvements and layout include the sight distance available at the intersection of Hall and Burnham, the lack of turning lanes, narrow traffic lanes, and inadequate surface and storm drainage facilities. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Alignment Two street alignments were evaluated along Hall Blvd. The alignments vary at the reverse curve in the vicinity of the intersection with S.W. Burnham Street. The first alignment would follow the centerline of the existing right-of-way. This alignment allows 6 feet of clearance between the corner of the Amber Foods building on Tax Lot 100 and the curb of the proposed improvements. r j S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 Page 4 The second alignment slightly flattens the reverse curves by increasing the radii to 240 feet and eliminating a short 50-foot tangent between the curves. This alignment was layed out to minimize the right-of-way taken from Tax Lots 200 and 400 while providing 8 feet of clearance for a commercial sidewalk between the corner of the building on Tax Lot 100 and the curb of the proposed improvements. IEErovements The proposed full-street improvements along Hall Blvd. consist of new pavement, curbs, sidewalks, and storm sewers. The basic improvement south of Burnham Street would be 50 feet curb to curb and would provide a 12-foot traffic and 6-foot bike lane each way and a 14-foot wide common turn lane. Eight-foot wide sidewalks would be constructed along both sides of the street. The proposed improvements on the east half of Hall between the railroad and S.W. Burnham Street would be 22 feet wide from centerline to curb and would provide for a 16-foot traffic lane and 6 feet of a 14-foot common turn lane. There would be a transition in the northbound direction from 25 feet to 22 feet from centerline to curb at the intersection with Burnham Street. Bicycle traffic from south of Burnham Street would be directed to the west side of Hall Blvd. at Burnham. The proposed improvements along the south side of Burnham Street would include sidewalk, curbs, storm drains and new paving to centerline. The proposed improvement would be 22 feet wide from centerline to curb which would allow for a 4-foot bike lane, a 12-foot traffic lane, and 6 feet of a 12-foot coauon turn lane. The sidewalks would be five feet wide. The Hall Blvd. bridge over Fanno Creek would not be included in the street improvements. It would not be economically feasible to replace the bridge at this time and because Hall Blvd. is an arterial, the benefits of replacing the bridge would accrue to a much larger area than the proposed LID. P` S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 page 5 Zhe Tigard Water District is planning on providing half-street improvements for the west half of S.W. Hall Blvd. and east half of S.W. Burnham across from Tax Lots 200 (Tigard Electric) and 100 (Amber Foods), when they deve- lop their new office site. If the full-street improvement option were chosen, Hall Blvd. would the.. be completely improved from the railroad to O'Mara. Richt-of-Way The basic right-of-way for the proposed improvements would be 70 feet wide from side to side or 35 feet to the centerline. The 70-foot right-of-way width would allow for a 50-foot wide street curb to curb, and 8-foot sidewalks and 2-foot planting strips on both sides. The right-of-way would be increased to 40 feet to centerline at the bus turnout for the Civic Center. North of Burnham on the east side of Hall Blvd. the right-of-way would be maintained at 30 feet from the existing centerline so that the existing Amber Foods building on Tax Lot 100 remains outside the right-of-way. This allows for a 22-foot street improvement from centerline to curb from the building north to the railroad. Going south through the reverse curve at the intersection with Burnham, the street improvement gradually increases to 25 feet for both the existing and flattened alignments. For the existing alignment the street improvement would be 24 feet wide at the building corner leaving roam for a 6-foot sidewalk. For the flattened alignment, the proposed centerline has been shifted approximately 1 foot west of the existing centerline at the building corner and the proposed street improvement is 23 feet wide there. this leaves roan for an 8-foot sidewalx. The right-of-sway from the proposed oenterline would be 31 feet. On the west side of Hall Blvd. between Burnham Street and the Civic Center property, the right-of-sway would be 30 feet to centerline for the new alignment across Tax Lot 200 (Tigard Electric) and across Tax Lot 400 (Sturgis). The right-of-way across Tax .[rats 200 and 400 would be five feet back of the curb face and a 3--foot sidewalk easement would be required r S.W. Ball Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 Page 6 across the property for sidewalk construction. The reduced right-of-way width would give Sturgis and Tigard Electric Co. more latitude in improving their property. This is a major concern of Tigard Electric Co. especially since they will have to dedicate additional right-of-way for the S.W. Burnham Street improvements. The right-of-way for the proposed improvements on Burnham Street would be 30 feet to centerline, which will take 10 feet off the north side of Tigard Electric Company's property. The right-of-way acquisitirn requirements for the two street alignments are shown in Table 1. A typical street improvement detail is shown in Figure 1. Variations in right-of-way and street widths are shown in Figure 2. TABLE 1. RIGHT-OF-44MY ACQUISITION REQUIREMMIS IH SQUARE FEET Tax Lot Existiraa Alignment New Alignment 200 11100 2,100 400 200 400 401 10,800 10,800 702 2,000 2,000 701 4,200 4,200 Total Half-Street 18,300 19,500 100 0 0 501 1,600 1,600 600 8,800 8,800 Total Full-Street 28,700 29,900 4 s S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 Page 7 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE f Since the two centerline alignments evaluated only varied at most 7 feet through the reverse curves, any differences in construction costs would be very small. An estimate of the probable cost of the street and related utility improvements has been developed for the half-street and full-street improvements for either alignment: Half-Street Full-Street Item Improvements Improvements Street improvements to curbs $ 92,000 $ 187,000 Sidewalks 23,000 48,000 Storm drainage 45,000 52,000 Subtotal Construction Costs $ 160,000 $ 287,000 Administration, engineering and contingency $ 48,000 $ 86,000 Right-of-way acquisition 85,000 115,000 Subtotal Total Assessible Costs $ 293,000 $ 488,000 Traffic signal $ 54,000 $ 54,000 PROJECT COSTS $ 347,000 $ 542,000 An additional 30 percent was added to the construction cost to account for project administration, engineering and a contingency fund. Appraisals were conducted in October 1985 to determine the cost of acquiring right-of-way along Tax Tats 200, 400, 701 and 702. A June 1984 appraisal was used to determine the cost of acquiring right-of-way from the Civic Center property. The acquisition costs for right-of-way along the east side of Hall Blvd. were estimated using unit cost data from the appraisals. An allowance was added for professional services and for city staff time needed to acquire the right-of-way. S.W. Y 11 Blvd. iaD Revised 10/85 Page 8 Two options were evaluated along Tax Lots 200 and 400. The first option { would place the sidewalk within the right-of-way. The second option would place the sidewalk partially inside the right-of-way and partially outside the right-of-way in an easement. The second option would minimize right- of-way acquisition. Since the difference in cast was only $5,000, it was assumed that the larger right-of-way area would be required. A sight distance easement will also be required along Tax Lots 200 and 400. The above ousts are not guaranteed, but represent the engineer's best esti- mate of the prices that can be expected and the amounts that should be bud- geted if the proposed project is let to competitive bidding during the fall of 1985. RECOMt OMED ALTERNATIVE Ir_ is recommended that the proposed Hall Blvd. irrprovements follow the new centerline alignment with the centerline radii of the two horizontal curves increased to 240 feet. This alternative was recommended in the traffic study report done separately from this report and it reflects the existing pavement striping layout. Over time the pavement striping, which should follow the centerline of the right-of-way, has shifted away from the exist- ing right-of-way centerline. The recommended alternative requires that the right-of-way be adjusted so that the centerline of the street and right-of- way are coincident. The recommended alternative shifts the centerline approximately 7 feet west of the existing centerline through the reverse curves. It is also recommended that only the west half of Hall Blvd. be improved. '_ During a meeting with property owners to discuss the proposed LID, it became clear that most property owners along the east side of Hall Blvd. were not interested in participating in the LIG. Currently there is little interest in developing property on the east side of Hall Blvd. It is reconmended that a tra.ffic signal be installed at the intersection, of S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. Burnham Street. This intersection meets the mini- nm warrants for the installation of a traffic signal based on Warrant 2, Interruption of Continuous Traffic, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 Page 9 Devices". Traffic flow information was estimated from a series of traffic surveys conducted at the site. These traffic surveys were oomrnissioned by kpff and the results are presented in "City of Tigard, Hall Avenue at Burn- z ham Road, Preliminary Engineering Report", August 23, 1985, Robert Keech, . P.E., Inc. i OWNERSHIP AND PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Ownership of property within the street LID is shown in Table 2 along with assessed or appraised property values or recent purchase prices. Ownership was determined from the hbshington County tax roll along with the assessed value when that information was given. When assessed values were not given, they were determined from recent purchase prices, appraisals, or estimated using the assessed values for similar pieces of property. These - special cases are noted in Table 2. During a meeting with the City of Tigard and affected property owners, it wes discussed that LID boundaries should appropriately be set back 200 feet from the proposed right-of-way line. At the intersection of O'Mara and Hall Blvd., the boundary would extend northwest from the northwk zt corner of the intersection at a 45 degree angle to eliminate the potential for a double assessment of Tax Lot 701 should O'Mara Street be improved in the future. Part of Tax Lot 400 is within 200 feet of the right-of-way line for the south half of Burnham Street but outside the 200-foot line for Hall Blvd. Since Tax Lot 400 does not have access to Burnham, this area was excluded from the LID, and the boundary placed along the property line between Tax Lots 200 and 400. s Within the LID boundaries shown in Appendix A, the project coy is would be distributed by the front footage along the proposed right-of-way line and by land area within the LID boundaries. Both would be weighted by 50 percent. Property area within the LID and front footage at the proposed right-of-way are shown in Table 2 with the proposed assessment rates. F These assessment rates are approximate. The actual assessment will be based on final project costs and actual assessed areas and front footages. i i j S.W. Hall Blvd. LID Revised 10/85 page 10 TABLE 2. O&MRSHIP AND PROPOSED ASSESSM&M Proposed Assessment Tax Assessed Area in Front Half-Street Lot Owner Value LID(ac) Foo a (test) Full-Street 200 Harold E. & Blench Reoh $103,000 0.7 354 $ 49,000 $ 40,000 (Tigard Electric) 400 Richard N. Sturgis 286,000 0.7 162 32,000 25,000 401 City of Tigard 555,200* 2.8 674 130,000 104,000 702 Richard N. & Francis C. 76,600 0.9 140 35,000 28,000 Sturgis 701 Tigard Christian Church 700,000** 0.9 279 47,000 38,000 Total for Half-Street 6.0 1,609 $293,000 e 100 Amber Investinent Co. 460,500 1.2 343 49,000 501 Amber Investment Co. 331,100 1.7 347 59,000 600 Alvin C. & Ellen L. Barnes 86,800 3.9 934 145,000 Total of Full-Street 12.8 3,233 $488,000 *Tax lots 700 and 401 were combined in 1985: Estimated value of Tax Lot 700 is $15,200; 1984 purchase price for Tax Int 700 was $540,000 (appraised at $478,000 in 1984). **Appraised value from church's financial officer. ) 70' 35' 35' 2' 8 25' 25' 8' 2' ' 12' 14' 12' 6' TRAFFIC TURN TRAFFIC IKE s - 0.0227 , 0. • o CONC. { I R/W 4" CLASS "B" ASPHALT IN TWO 2 LIFTS R(W 2" 3/4"-0" CRUSHED ROCK/GRAVEL 14" 2"-0" CRUSHED ROCK/GRAVEL FIGURE 1. TYPICAL STREET SECTION k p f$ CONSULTING 1 W. H.ENGINEERS 11 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 EAST WEST R/W R/W 75'• - HALL BLVD BET 4EEN RAILROAD AND BURNHAM STREET 30'• 45' IMPROVEMENT BY TIGARD WATER D STR T "- oc O N_ 1:311 O 2'• O a 'Ca 8' 16' 14'i 12' 16' _ WAL TURN LANE RIGHT TURNf±1 6' 8, 1' AND- SCAPE STRIP EAST R/W 10' 5'• - HALL BLVD ACROSS TAX LOTS 20016 400 TIGARD ELECTRIC d STURGIS SIGHT DISTANCE 35'• 3 ASEMEN7 m 25'• 25' EAS MENT wi '• 1 12' 14' 1 61 1 g+ W Y, ]SIDEWALK- BIKE 1'lRN BIKE OE K r $ LANELANE I G N �! W M *WIDTH VARIES THROUGH TRANSITION FROM 22' TO 25' WIDE STREET WEST R/W EAST R/W 75'- HALL SLYD AT CIUC CENTER 5 TURNOUT W 35' jo, W K 'LANDSCAPE i' LANDSCAPE ' STRIP STRIP 25 la 2' 112, 12' BUS]SIB' lii Q WAL K TURN LANE BIKE 1� W LANE 4 ERIE r EAST WEST R/W R/W 70' - 'MARA STREET 350 35' a 12' STRIP STRIP DSCAP E 1 1 2' DSCAPE y wl , 61 1141 17 1 1 B/• v 1- SIDEWAL TURN LANE K (c Y G LANE LAN FIGURE 2, VARIATIONS IN STREET WIDTHS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY HALL BLVD. LOOKING SOUTH k p f f CONSUL.TING ENGIN[ERX 421 S.W.STN.SUITE 411 PORTLAND.OREGON 47204 NORTH SOUTH R/W R/W t 60' — SUAHAN STREET ce 30' JINPROVEMENT BY TIGARD WATER 30'" t;I22, ' 1 3' t o�c el 5' 4' 12' 12 + 4+ 5 I SCAF- STRI P BIK TURN LANE IK D - �> rc L UGNE mrd Zs U t1 3' LAND- -w SCAPE STRIP �' FIGURE 2. VARIATIONS IN STREET WIDTHS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY - BURNHAM STREET LOOKING EAST k p f H CONSULTING ILNGINEERS 421 S.W.9TH.SUITE 611 PORTLAND.OREGON *7204 _ APPENDIX A PROPOSED LID BOUNDARY - �e esl ze ae �eee Anenda- NOTE s s�: IF THIS MICRDFILMED -- .� 2 •� 4 .. _ rJ - s- - 7 8 _. 9 O i 1 --.. 12 F AM DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN ' THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. _ . OE 62 8Z LZ 82 SZ 42 EZ ZZ 12 OZ sit BI LI 91 Sr' 6t EI ZI 11 01 6 8 [ —9-__.. .........._ 8— ti �ntCuuhuslosstNsllNWlesulns�lxitttttt�„ess,,�; ,�Rt u�+••t• +•• ,.•.s».I. .s...s118 ,.!1 s � ...............lllil9MARUM — — --- � r O > / yti E h 0 X/ O I^ 4 N Q O, O m / H]90'9 M.52 e10$ �yrSW HALL BLVD T* f PROPOSED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY - Z M Z o 5 TAX LOT 401 TAX LOT 702 TAX LOT 701 o a 4 CITY OF TIGARD STURGIS TIGARD CHRISTIAN ®® F- _ TAX LOT 400 \ �' CHURCH ®® W° STURGIS a , i ir PROPOSED ® TAX LOT 200 REOH STREET r O® f RIGHT-OF-WAY No N Q << N ®N `� O V Q N n w rt Las>i' w o s Zab 1m cQ (!)N �a c Q M P{ r1 1 Ob t` SOONB 3.M.ION 64tl> _ yC6gZ°ZON 6 i SCALE: 1" = 100' LEGEND a PROPOSED LID BOUNDARY `F v a Co FIGURE A-1 a o S.W. HALL BLVD LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT STUDY AREA 2 N DISTRICT - PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP W rn EXISTING OWNERSHIP BOUNDARY to N k p F f - CONSULTING ENGINEERS S 423 SM. GT SUITE e11 PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 c. i �'+i1��1►�13!}!{rllrl��i'IyrJlt� +Il�r}!fir{lhrr !}!!rj'1Tr�T Ilg3 !}r�!{ii !T !{i !{rTrir !1� r} r�! !(! l�� t! ! ! ------ NDTE: IFTHIS NICRDFILMED �. � � � � I � � � 1_-r � t � � � -�1 i }� }'4'}'�e{Tl�f►}'!'!'!'�'r'I'r'J11�1'1!�'1!i!!'�'!!1'!'�'i'I°!! i; .._ .I Z 3 4 -- - _ 5 6- 7 8 9 0t! 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN '�. _ - - ' THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO _. �; . THE QUALITY OF TTE ORIGINAL DRAWING. oe sz -®z �a az si oz sz az 1;3 oz sr ei ti s! Si....i i " e! -is __.ii--o�s e i_ s s __ b ___a -z !--aimMAkiCHF :+ll�Nrllmi�rNduu�uugNaaknale_, n Wl�ilt�lolo = 7 ' 1 n. ®d APPENDIX B RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Runoff calculations were performed for an area covering Edgewood and O'Mara Streets that would be tributary to a proposed storm drain along the west side of Hall Blvd. The 10- and 25-year flows were determined using the rational method (Q=CiA) assuming that storm drains and inlets would be installed along Edgewood and O'Mara Streets. The coefficient of runoff, C, was determined from the zoning districts shown on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map, dated May 9, 1983, and the average slope of the drainage area. All the drainage area, except for a small area between Hall Blvd., Fanno Creek and O'Mara Street, is zoned R-4.5 or residential with a 7,500 square foot minimum lot sLze. The small area along Hall is zoned R-12 (PD) or 12 units per acre residential with a planned development overlay. The existing church at Hall and O'Mara is allowed as a conditional use within the R-12 zone. The slope of the drainage area, which ranges from 3 to 5 percent and the zoning correspond to a runoff coefficient of 0.45. The drainage area, A, shown in Figure B-1 is 36.9 acres. During the analysis it was found that the 6.5-acre area surrounding Hillview Court and shown in Figure B-1 had such a long time of concentration that when it was included, peak flows were lower than when it was not included. The storm drain along Hall Blvd. was sized for a drainage area of 30.4 acres which excluded the area along Hillview Court. The rainfall intensity, i, was determined from Washington County, "Standard Engineering Design and Construction Specifications for Roads", Table X, "Rainfall Intensities for East Washington County (for Ranges 1 & 2 West)" given the time of concentration calculated for the drainage basin. w. 2 le QI r- 5� 40 �N; CSD 1 �%(PD) ion • `\ i.f CBD goo RA AWST " ,o Nr- - SDGEWAOD ST f -�` L imiat w,s=a=11 AILLdIEW CT DRAINAGE BO�ARY as! wt s+a (TRIBUTARY AREA NOT_ — ICONTRIBUTING,.J,R.PFK FLOW f=e �. ?R-4.5 w+w� L 1 _� awewsa+s� r i�• t'. ® A = _fir• I�� R FWALITV (. t = ! i IS `'• •tu 1 s . «f•a..o. ID moill IGS swap 0 1111111 . v1.t F.M 1.. I•. +� �. �! �• oj --3.5 R /'` _ __ ' j j-'. �is i .�•:. . ' �_ `4 4 1 8!®1O. iiiimi m'a!!�m iiii als s!1 m sm, .aftwo 6.1m m®�D k p f T CONSULTING ENGINEERS FIGURE B-1 !x+ S.W.sTM.SUIT s++ DRAINAGE AREA FOR PORTLAND,ORCGON e�aoa RUNOFF CALCULATIONS A preliminary storm drain and inlet system was layed out along Edgewood and O'Mara Streets to determine travel time. A maximum inlet spacing of 500 feet was used in most cases and it was assumed that the storm drains would be installed parallel to the existing street grade. Peak flows were determined at each inlet based on the travel time to that inlet and the downstream pipe was sized to carry the flow. Above the farthest inlet, upstream travel time was calculated from overland flow. Within the storm drains, travel time was calculated from the pipe size and slope assuming the pipe was flowing full. Individual travel times were added to determine the time of concentration. The runoff calculations are summarized in Table B-1. Ptunoff from the area along Edgewood Street could be diverted into a swale southeast of the 90-degree bend in the street, reducing the .area draining to Hall Blvd. by 11.2 acres (excluding the area surrounding Hillview Court). A reduced drainage area of 19.2 acres would result in peak 10- and 25-year flows of 14.4 cfs and 17.0 cfs, respectively. These flows are still large enough to require an 18-inch storm drain along the west side of Hall Blvd. The larger area was used to size the storm drain because it does not exclude the possibility of constructing a system along Edgewood Street that would drain to Hall Blvd. Constructing the system in existing street right-of-ways could be more desirable than placing it in an easement to the Swale. TABLE B-l. SMMM OF XMFF CALCUTATIMS Drainage Minimun Pipe Location Area (ac) Event (yrs) Flow (cfs) Pipe Size (in.) Slope (ft./ft.) Intersection 29.0 10 15.9 18 0.023 of Hall and O'Mara 25 18.8 18 0.033 Hall Blvd. 30.4 10 16.4 18 0.025 at Fanno Creek 25 19.3 18 0.035 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council October 24, 1985 FROM: Donna Corbet, Executive Secretaryt `' SUBJECT: November 11, 1985, Special Meeting Approve Special Executive Session Meeting for November 11, 1985, per ORS 192.660 (1) (d) labor relations. i (1113F) A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28 1985 _ AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 24, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: City Represent— ative on County Road System PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan Discussion. REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Transportation Committee has requested that the City Council designate Mark Padgett as the City's official liaison to the County on the issue of the County's policy on road jurisdiction. — ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Designate Mark Padgett as the official liaison for this purpose. 2. Take no action. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that the Council designate Mark Padgett as the City's official liaison to the County on the issue of County Road Jurisdiction. (WAM:br/2031P) i MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Members of the City Council 5 t1,}��" October 24, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: City Representation on County Road System Discussion Mark Padgett, member of the Tigard Advisory Committee on Transportation, has been suggested by the Transportation Committee as the City's official liaison to the County on the issue of the County's policy on road jurisdiction. The Committee has asked that the City Council officially designate Mark as the official liaison in this regard. I support the recommendation as I feel that Mark's involvement in both the Transportation Committee and County Planning Commission provide him with a good background which will assist our position. A copy of the Transportation Committee minutes of October 3, 1985 are attached. (WAM:brl2031P) f,. OWNER RECEIVED .• , 14 1985 CITY OF TIGMD TIGARD TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 3rd, 1Se5 MEETING Presents Tom Sullivan (Chair) , MarK Padgett (Vice-chair), Lidi,ia Balodis, Milt Fyre, Joe Schweitz, Wilbur Bishop ( late). Absents Dennis Hummel . Guests$ Marx De Ment, Geraldine Ball , Bob Jean. The meeting was called to order by Chair Tom Sullivan at 7806 PM. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved. Items 4 and 5 were removed from the agenda due to the absence of staff member Duane Roberts. Marx gave a presentation of the county 's new "fee-per-trip" plan but did not maKe a recommendation. Wilbur, Lidija and Milt expressed concern ' about certain aspects of the plan and how they relate to Tigard's Particular situation. Bob Jean explained county and city road funding mechanisms including criticism of fee-per-trip". He said fees may be distorted downward which could result in •zoning" for the purpose of determining distribution of funds and road building locations. He stated 1 his opinion the new plan may not be desirable in Tigard, Tualatin and Beaverton but might help in the unincorporated county areas. Concensus was reached by the Committee to taKe up F-P-T when and if the City Council decides to consider it. Tom read a letter that the county sant to the City of Tigard regarding county policy on road jurisdiction. The county still bas problems with the Murray road extension. The county has postponed until December 3rd a decision on jurisdiction. The Committee appo intsd MarK as off is ial liason to the county on this issue and recommended that the City Council designate him as such. Dennis Hummel was appointed by Tom to be Committee secretary, mainly due to the fact he was not there to defend himself. Tom read a letter from ODOT regarding traffic lwvact in the Tigard triangle area. He then discussed the new Committee timeline received from Bob Jean. Milt !lave an overview of the transportation pian update procedure and will worx on a mechanism to achieve this goal. Lidi.ia expressed concern and dismay at recent variances granted by the City Council . The meeting was adJorned at 6127 PM. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ( COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY rf AGENDA OF: 10-28-85 AGENDA ITEM N: ` ri DATE SUBMITTED: _ 10-15-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUEIAGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of � r Bouman St. Dedication & Street PREPARED BY: Randv Clarno improvement non-remonstrance_.a r}eement REQUESTED BY: Engineering & Donna Bouman DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: tf,,; ` ' t CITY ADMINISTRATOR: o _ POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Donna Bouman and Greg Rose recently received approval to partition a tract of land on SW 76th Avenue just north of SW Durham Road. Conditions of approval included a Street Dedication and Street Improvement Non-remonstrance agreement. Attached are the executed documents for your review. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Engineering recommends that Council accept this Street Dedication and Street Improvement Non-remonstrance Agreement and authorize the City Recorder to record this document with Washington County. 1988P dmj t INDIVIDUAL-CENERAL PARTNERSHIP STREET DEDICATION KNOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Donna Bouman do hereby dedicate to the Public a perpetual sight-of-vay for street, road and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along and within the following described real property in Washington County, Oregon: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public forever for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the owner(s) in fes simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant the rights above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The amount paid for this dedication is $ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, th grantor($) h ave) hereunto set burr (her) (dasher) (her) and seal(s) this day of t' (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OT OREGON ) „�- ss. COUNTY OT #bkf &Z0101111-1 x , 19 ,Tersonaliy appeared the above namad vhp executed this nstrument and each of them acknowledged to no that. th $ nstrument vab-exfcuted voluntarily and freely. _. _.-�AC�l"to-L Notary Public for OregonF My Commission expires: ACCEPTANCE Approved as to form this day of CU r 9„ �• IrAtt ALLttorn - C ty of Tigard Approved as to legal description this day of �"D 19 By: C't C ty o Tigard ^�SurAlaAov- Aeesptsd by the City Council this �day of ( JGTc��a�r Cl Y COU . OP12I�•O\REC0N gy. ty Recorder - C ty of Tsgard (1 Z04A) (7-84), i' Westlake Consultants Inc. 7145 S.W. Vcarns Rd. Tigard, *Oregon 97223 503-6840652 ' Greg Rose Street Dedication Project Now 251-01-85 Sept. 23, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 1, "Durham Acres", in the Southwest Quarter, Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: The west 35.00 feet of that tract of land described in deed to Rennith P. Bouman and Donna L. Bouman in Fee No. 790+43129, recorded October 18, 1979. cm ENGINEERING / SURVEYING / PLANNING 161 i ZZ, � 0 Q a ' a ? '1 p�'' 0 �.4 V) �yc ui L c��t��`� aM Z.,hg ° w Ztil v%-q Li;" Q�b Ul h Oq LU 13 R WK gQti� V co Wafek IA el rd�` �n p r ( ' tA In Sk k I ox I! w ,`- 3 3a ' 0 3 � IK s -• � ��n '� Quo .a ��„ � ,o�Y•6 .�4.al.tc.iOs � hOb�ti� �.W aoo,r .oa-as oor td�i0 fyya.ts cos .O�s ibsv �.B .0•t./N � s 4 :mit d y—��L ibtS' p N N / INDIVIDUAL - GENERAL PARTNERSHIP CONSENT COVENANT (NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT) Street Improvements The undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby record their consent to the formation of a local improvement district by the City of Tigard for the purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property abuts. The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to oppose or remonstrate e abutting i the formation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the ab street or streets, reserving only the right to contest the inclusion of rict havesundermthe nlawse f the improvement State of tOregon to proceeding n d any right contest theyparticularthe proposed they mayy assessment formula. The real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT -A" h IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grant r( ) has (haveQ L/ ) h is aunt (her)) their) hand(,) and seal(s) this day o (SEAL) a, (SEAL) s.s� (SEAL) C ��Y�Z� (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON County of lush#' t0*- ) /, BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this ' day of _"ee lg �l3' public in and for the State of Oregon, before me, the undersigned Notary personally appeared the within-named who is (are known to we to be tha identicaI'llividue (s) dascri a in and who executed the within instrusent and acknowledged to me that he (she) (they) executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN ST 8NY WiiER or, I have hereunto sat my hand and seal this day of otCom Pub is for Oregon (NOT IAL Sgg��.11 DICKENSON y Commission Expires: w^-� Cl H01 ;GUC Approved &ft" 9 . �C.t. y Atto n.y - !ty of Ti$ar Q� Approved as to legal description this le—daycf ' l9 ep i By. City - City o Tigard rv¢y�r�+ Approved this nGrlk day of CJC.T�►+er , 19 CITY COU IL, ITY''Ognn T�ICARD, oRECON By. ! ty Recorder - City of Tigard (02066-)-' i, Westlake Consuitc: Inc. -- 7145 S.W. Varns Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 ® 503-684-0652 i Greg Rose Parcel 1 Project No. 261-01-85 Sept. 23, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 1, "Durham Acres", in the Southwest Quarter, Section .12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence, South 01027127" West, along the east line of said Lot 1, a distance of 66.20 feet; thence, South 27048107" West, along said east line, a distance of 76.21 feet to the northeast corner of that tract conveyed to Wayne Edward and wife, by deed recorded March 28, 1958, in Book 403, Page 339, deed records; thence, North 88043100" West, along the north line of said Edward tract, a distance of 162.29 feet; thence, North 01034108" East, parallel with S.W. 76th Avenue, a distance of 94.40 feet; thence, North 88043100" West, a distance of 110.00 feet, to a point on a line that is 25.0 feet easterly of, when measured at right angles, and parallel with the centerline of S.W. 76th Avenue; thence, North 01034108" East, along said parallel line, a distance of 40.00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1; thence, South 88043100" East, along said north line, a distance of 305.85 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 29,586 square feet. ENGINEERING / SURVEYING / PLANNING IF Westlake Consultants Inc. 7145 S.W. Varns Rd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 ® 503-684-0655 Greg Rose Parcel 2 Project No. 261-01-85 Sept. 23, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of -Lot 1, "Durham Acres", in the Southwest Quarter, Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence, North 8843100" West, along the north line of said Lot 1, a distance of 305.85 feet, to a line that is 25.00 feet east of, when measured at right angles, from the centerline of S.W. 76th Avenue; thence, . South 01034108' West, along said line, a distance of 40.00 feet to the point of beginning of this description; thence, South 88043100" East, parallel with said north line of Lot 1, a distance of 110.00 feet; thence, South 01034108" West, parallel with S.W. 76th Avenue, a distance- of 94.40 feet to the north line of that tract conveyed to Wayne Edward and wife, by deed recorded March 28, 1958, in Book 403, Page 339, deed records; thence, North 88043°00" West, along said north line, a distance of 110.00 feet; thence, North 01034.08" East, along a line that is 25.00 feet east of, when measured at right angles, from the centerline of S.W. 76th Avenue, a distance of 94.40 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 10,384 square feet. ENGINEERING SURVEYING / PLANNING IIli� r e�un l sWy to � AM n z ul Z� o to O .�Q -D °1 o 20 O 6, o i i i 9 ',.�J O in o {ter �ii icyl f 'i ox i �3 ff Ltj h q i h � acwq�h ' V� `ft a 214 h�2 Ht aWo 00'x4- Iaay ad ,OOT NO/1d•7h73C.'Y 13s�d.'1S .00F ,Ot dai 3 80,AlF.!N co O �A&' /yr 91 :94 d 10 c D IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 11 17' 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON Yi MSE:' ,; -` � -'�' ' 3 Department of Domestic Relations 04 4 In the Matter of the Marriage of ) _ 5 ) DONNA L. BOUMAN, ) ) 6 Petitioner, ) No. D84-1071 7 ) and ) STIPULATED DECREE OF 8 ) DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE KENNETH P. BOUMAN, ENTERED ON DOCKET 9 Respondent. ) g� pat*:- as 'I - �' 10 THIS MATTER coming on before the Court on the 11 day of ✓1.'.t�' , 1984, on the Affidavit of Petitioner; 12 the Respondent not being represented by counsel and having ( 13 signed this Stipulated Decree of Dissolution and the default 14 of the Respondent having been noted and duly entered of 15 record; the Court being fully advised in the premises; 16 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 17 1. The marriage of the parties is dissolved and shall 19 terminate on the _ day of ", 1984, or if appeal 19 is taken, then upon determination of appeal, whichever is later, 20 without further action of either paAy; 21 2. If either party shall die before said date, the 22 marriage relationship shall terminate immediately before such 23 death, unless an appeal is pending; upon such death, if an appeal 24 is pending, it may be continued by the personal representative of 25 the deceased party, and the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court 26 shall have the power to determine finally all matters presented Page 1 - STIPULATED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE 1 I on such appeal; 2 3. Any Will of either party antedating the date hereof 3 is revoked, insofar as its terms benefit the other party, unless 4 its terms express a contrary intention; 5 4. This Decree may be vacated within thirty days from 6 this date or during an appeal, upon joint motion of the parties; 7 S. There have been four children born of this marriage. 8 All are now emancipated. Their names and birthdates are as follows: 9 JEFFREY DALE BOUMAN, born November 4, 1959, PETER SCHUYLER BOUMAN, born April 3, 1961, 10 JOHN EDWARD BOUMAN, born October 3, 19A2, and CHRISTOPHER JAMES BOUMAN, born April 5, 1964. 11 12 6. The personal property of the parties is awarded to 13 that party currently in possession of each respective item. 14 Specifically, Petitioner is awarded the Waukashaw 15 generator, two "Cat" waterpumps, a 9' x 12' tandem trailer, 16 miscellaneous equipment, office supplies and tools in her possession, 17 furniture, jewelry, the 1977 Toyota automobile, and personal effects. 18 Specifically, Respondent is awarded his personal 19 effects. 20 7. Of the debts acquired by either or both parties 21 during the term of the marriage, Petitioner agrees to assume, 22 pay and hold harmless certain obligees regarding business debt ! 23 owed by Respondent including Business Banking Corporation of 24 Beaverton in the amounts owing them in toto, Pacific Western 25 Bank in the amount owing to them in toto, $300.00 to Randall 26 Poff, Attorney at Law, $300.00 to Pacific Northwest Bell and Page 2 - STIPULATED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE t I approximately $200.00 to the Oregonian Publishing Company. 2 Any and all personal property held by either of 3 these companies as collateral is hereby awarded to Petitioner 4 regardless of whether or not such properties were specifically S mentioned in paragraph six above. 6 Respondent shall pay and hold Petitioner harmless 7 from unsecured debts owed with regard to his personal business as 8 follows: City of Tigard (amount disputed) , Associated Northwest 9 Incorporated ($198.00) , Fordham Accounting Services ($1,908.54) , 10 Groves-Kiewit-Granite ($400.00) , Home Gas Company ($204.34) , 11 Miller Paint Company ($307.98) , Landa Incorporated ($63.10) , 12 Montgomery Ward ($947.74) , City of North Bonneville ($242.04) , 13 Pacific Northwest Bell ($302.00) , P.D.D. Number 3 ($137.21) , 14 Rhodda Paint ($1,792.85) , City of Shelton, Washington ($54.75) , 15 Star Rentals ($1,477.79), Western Pacific dba Riddell Interna- 16 tional (amount disputed) , United States National Bank Visa 17 ($1,500.00) . 18 Petitioner is awarded judgment against Respondent 19 in the amount of these total bills to be satisfied to the extent 20 regular payment is made on these accounts by Respondent. 21 8. Petitioner is awarded all right, title and interest 22 in the real property and residence located at 15940 S.W. 76th in 23 Tigard, Oregon and legally described as: 24 2 South 1, 12 CD 00700, DURHAM ACRES, City of Tigard, County of Washington, and 25 State of Oregon. 26 free of any interest in Respondent. Petitioner shall pay and Page 3 - STIPULATED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE l I hold Respondent harmless from any and all existing encumbrances 2 including but not limited to the existing Note and Mortgage. 3 9. Each party to this suit shall pay his or her 4 own attorney's fees respectively. S 10. Each party to this suit hereby agrees to sign 6 any and all documents necessary to effectively transfer title 7 or accomplish directives outlined in this Stipulated Decree of 8 Dissolution set forth above. 9 DATED this day of �le , 1984. 10 11 12 Circuit rt 4ug`_e_ 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED; 14 1S 16 DONNA L. BOUMAN, Petitioner KENNETH P. BOUMAN,• espondent Pro Per 17 1 .`1 t 8 , te�at�ea 14 S t Sore - o ink, o. 741 tae +e�r%a mmorw eee to ne titiolier s"ttlod 4 C*h e w*.tm a"wed mm S re VVne ON me A ori office end M CSOWt. e+ teR'wr4ry �w.et, � ere `�S,}i�Ar•. 21 asw9 eAe atn"ed tee '` E•` 22 tS&4llit txttlR f �, Q,51 ties► NGIM mum23 ' 24 �y�•' z 25 26 Page 4 - STIPULATED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE } I RELEVANT DATA 2 Petitioner's Name: DONNA L. BOUMAN 3 Address: 15940 S.W. 76th, Tigard, Oregon 97223 4 Social Security Number: 452-48-8662 5 Age: 51 6 Respondent's Name: KENNETH L. BOUMAN 7 Address: Garden Home West Apartments, Oleson Road, Portland, Oregon 8 Social Security Number: Unknown 9 Age: 56 10 Place of Marriage: Los Angeles County, California 1! Date of Marriage: March 28, 1959 12 There have been four children born of this marriage. All are 13 now emancipated. Their names and birthdates are as follows: 14 JEFFREY DALE BOUMAN, born. November 4, 1959, 15 PETER SCHUYLER BOUMAN, born April 3, 1961, JOHN EDWARD BOUMAN, born October 3, 1962, and 16 CHRISTOPHER JAMES BOUMAN, born April 5, 1964. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 5 e STIPULATED DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: io —zs— 65 AGENDA ITEM #: T L DATE SUBMITTED: October 18, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution Accepting Public Sanitary Sewer PREPARED BY: John Hagman Extension Known as the Mull Sewer Ext. and Release the Guarantee fBond REQUESTED BY: Community Development 1/`� CITY ADMINISTRATOR DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ��" i' �. POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The Mull sanitary sewer extension project is located westerly of S.W. Grant and S.W. Tigard Avenue; its' purpose was to service developing property thereat. 2. All construction is complete and has withstood the required one year maintenance guarantee period. 3. Verbage within the attached resolution will provide for release of the maintenance bond. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Pass the resolution accepting the public sanitary sewer improvements known as the Mull Sanitary Sewer extension, generally located west of S.W. Tigard Street and North of S.W. Grant. (JH:br✓2016P) t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ,t f AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 18, 1985 PREVIOUS ANION: Accept. of Performance ISSUElAGENDA TITLE: Resolution Bond and Sub Compliance Agreement accepting Copper Creek Phase III PREPARED BY: John Hagman ,+ REQUESTED BY: Tualatin Development Co. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK, ' '` ✓�; `r` ¢'� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: -- POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 33 1. Copper Creek (Phase III) is a plot subdivision located south of Durham Road and west of Kn$eland Estates Subdivision being adjacent to and just south of Copper Creek (Phase IV). 2. All public improvements except certain sidewalks have been installed. The developer, being Tualatin Development Co. , has submitted a One Year Performance Bond to guarantee installation of all sidewalks. 3. Further, said developer had posted a One Year Maintenance Bond to assure maintenance of installed public facilities and to assure correction of any deficiencies which may have arisen; said bond can now be released; the aforesaid sidewalk bond being sufficient to meet all remaining terms of the City's agreement with the developer. - — ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION That the City Council accept the public improvements constructed within Copper Creek Phase III subdivision and accept the sidewalk completion bond, and, further, authorize release of the project maintenance bond. (JH:pm/2017P) i. CHUBB GROUP of Insurance Companies , CHUBB 15 Mountain View Road.PO.Box 1615.Warren.N3 07661-1615 FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY SUBDIVISION PERFORMANCE BOND Bond No. 81078107�b KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we on _ Tualatin Devela meat Company a Division of Ha den �rQ4r'ri , Delaware Cor oration as Pr.inc$pa aII Federal insurance Company a corporation duly authorized to conduct a general surety business in the State of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held bound -unto the City of Tigard, Oregon a municipalit000.00a State. lawfulgmoneyeofithe�United er led the Obligee, in the sum of $ States of America, for the payment of which we, as Principal, and as Surety, jointly and severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS BOND AND OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that the Principals are completing sidewalk in Ca er Cr P are on an entecing intra a su r.vision subdivision located in t e ty a gar , g compliance agreement with the Obligee herein, and upon acceptance of said plat and compliance agreement, the Principals, shall make all improvements required by the City of Tigard, Ordinances and Subdivision Compliance agreement documents as described in said compliance agreement all of which are, by reference, made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and truly observe and comply with the terms of the agreement and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be peformed under said agreement and persons supplying /abor or material for shall promptly make payments to all any of the work provided by said agreement, and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or tioned shall be void, otherwise stouagainst remain infull force e andeffect� this obligation In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond, in addition to all other rights and remedies hereunder the City, in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court msy adjudge reasonable as and for attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this 11th day of September , 19 BS. Tualatin Development Company seal) a Division of Hayden Corporation By: - .-- — Name forporation r •1 BY: (seal) �$Y' ��- =;�""� c.e.__ esident By: � �L(d„�+�seal By: Secretary itne or urety (Corporation acknowledgement of corporate Federal Insurances Comm principal and a true copy of the Power urety {� of Attorney must be attached to theG �� '. s�----- original of this bond.) Attorney sn- act z` •, POWER-OF ATTORNEY r Know all Man by these Presents,That the FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,15 Mountain View Road.Warren.New Jersey.a New Jersey Corpora t' has constituted and appointed,and does hereby constitute and appoint Nancy L. Kummer, Raymoir nd E. White,�James R. •tley P. Walker and Leslie L. Rudat of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania----------------- each its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact to execute under such designation in its name and to affix its corporate seal to and deliver for anit on its twhrif As surely thereon or otherwise•bonds of any of the following classes,to-wil, 1. Bonds and Undertakings filed in anyy suit,matter or proceeding in any Court,a tiled with any Sheriff a Magistrate,for the doing or not doing of anything specified in such Bond or Undertaking. r aired or permitter.'under the laws or regulations relating to Customs 2. Surety bonds to the United Stares of America or any agency thereof,including under the taws. lords of any State.City.Town,V+iiaga. of Internal Revenue:License and Permit Bonds a otlrar indemnity Lost ,f Lease bonds.Workers'Comf�r+� Board or after body or organization.Public or wtvate:bonds to Transportation Comm s•.�ySheriffs.and similar public officials. tion bonds.MISCI flaneous Surety bonds and bards on befraff of Notaries Public. 3. Bonds on behalf of contractors in connection with bids,proposals or contracts. rn wwnw wbaoaa.Mo said FEDERAL eftiuKU"COMPANY Iiss.Prraus'rt w Is&fLimis•�id 1ho�p'a•an1111 r ba sipnad W 1111 AwklWr vioa PissidaM and AarMrA Ssora++iy and w =nwao aw f•w iia•n datedMda 7th 4"01 December Ia 83 Carport"s" ay1rA&-' Is MDVML ANV t(r / taaoet>s IWCflfaani UL— Assistant VW&Prfwleana .O'Cator A"Wks t a•aatOV *TATS OF NSw JWMV sg county of Somerset j\ on an 7th dw to December o'covwr w ala known n d W no ow known to be manse•9"f""Of Mr FTDERAL Aa (`.Ji a.o om"be"w no 0*sw«a.ad depose and a"fin A..Aann m sae+.un r vacs O011rANY.Mw coryraracwri d•acre•e+^mrd wnttr•,acuMd n d Aeorray K loan octoses s•M sae wY atAMo soiled ted•im,w,ir a Ma sy+� VVAM"aMt RAMM COWART and knows Mr caper++•sad M w oequaw"d wO Qsorpo&Acc~and Wows no"o be to Awwnm VCPPn•fd•n' of and Come".00 ala M upnad a"vown d Arany as As.+nna s ) Iiwo a said d osor"MOMW oak w "wain VAN= "w woman a 1104 a acµa,rd Com"W.and that ins 0p Awm a sad dso'as MCC140 n sub' J/il//6!/1 90 and in deporrnt's Woes— NeaarlM sadsog /� , Ackrwsasapf0 and swan a bolas err C op on Mr dMrear•A. t..ICE LEDt1ARD •• ROTARY ptll3llG Of NEtY JERSEY *TATs of V"JS1leSY My Commission E.-pings luno 28. 19b3 County of Somerset L!nor widaa+pno0.iV"" piny a Mrs pEOSRAL Ma*rMAIICE COMei/utV,oro nwwq—..n-.�.. of So sad C Xr*Wq s 411114pbd by ire 9oare d Owen qn on tMaretr 11.163 and mon ns, do aarndad wear t 1.1983 and wo Mn ey{aw is in AA rows aro ae•er. "ARTICLE XVa1. Sa¢a4ri t.All Oork/s.WidaelMd"pa•oonVaPs And setae bnaYimngnaf oMrr(Iran w aboua ow red an Barra a Mr CaffillO"'at A's awaatnod M boa or nor olrrs„to* mews.pray And Mrs be sasaesd in 00 red sed an bobw d err Company aMw by do Chamrai a oro vw*Cha s or w tressidw or a Vbrl°+abaiL f�a►y fast err s ri - a aw Aaa41Ms I OWSMO of 00 OWSOANO C001110110", *soeols'y.under aoY 1-80 CIIv dasipnarar•snaapl sial ami ser or arra daoan a dr'+ dssrD'rs+sd N e AiroA iMoMwbr d+Aoe^sY M M PIwa/d sab"nM afwciAae M O'ssid•d fir r*atlbn 3 below.miay aAaaAa a'+I web bad,lMidaetM4eip M flexr abApadai+ rk tlsimm3lAnpawndowogfaandenbMra4100WpnIWAY04 os'asanlsdMar �ebroaparAknodsatd'rMierTbsMPr'A"'aorwrno8bramr/0as'grws0•pei'wd drVW@.pnsnidwdors iAasYunV%V$Is Ned lolr4rwaatlrsoawrywssAsaMarltlaerslery. wepopeWhod.•• 1 bmMiM ss'WV MrM sad fEOSAAL agtN9At19S OOMPA7IYY erdy A•ransae a bansap Fd•AM and ertsiy bieieiaas k1"Chat to 99Mra dMrtlnNad Saslead AmsrWi.pMekad Cekwmia.PiwAo tllar.and wear d we Provk,oadCWwdswAhroawospoonoIP -ceEdwsidMsed:andrnMsedrAyreonradibbsew"Bob VA"onburk!a sr.Pus+asidowneankadbr . 1.Mrtindarw4nedAs WWASacnu'yor9rEr7 "La/suRANCSCOWART.doherbye•rtilyMrdMrtaspob+pPowerdAfonrybinbrarormandallaei. pith Ana September �1. SS On,"under my maria and the Mel d fad COMP"d Wn•n,N J.MM r �•o :Z JEftS�yf► POO ur.o form2t-ttrp3731Ed 7-"GENERAL CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: October 28, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: October 18, 1985PREVIOUS AC"TION: Accept of Performance ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution Bond and Sub Compliance Agreement - accepting Copper Creek Phase IV PREPARED BY: John Haqman REQUESTED BY: Tualatin Develop[nent Co. DEPART-MENT HEAD OK:� Jaz '' CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Copper Creek (Phase IV) is a 29 lot; subdivision located south of Durham Road and west of Kneeland Estates Subdivision being adjacent to and just north of Copper Creek (Phase III). 2. All public improvements except certain sidewalks have been installed. The developer, being Tualatin Development Co. , has submitted a One Year Performance Bond to guarantee installation of all sidewalks. 3. Further, said developer had posted a One Year Maintenance Bond to assure maintenance of installed public facilities and to assure correction of any deficiencies which may have arisen; said bond can now be released; the aforesaid sidewalk bond being sufficient to meet all remaining terms of the City's agreement with the developer. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION That the City Council accept the public improvements constructed within Copper Creek Phase IV subdivision and accept the sidewalk completion bond, and, further, authorize release of the project maintenance bond. (JH:pm/2017P) JOHNSON & HIGGINS JOHNSON & HIGGINS .OF PA.t INC. DEPARTMENT L 2515 P PITTSBURGHt PA. 1 264 (412) 391-5350 9257-00000 r' cum NO' INVOICE NO. 3020-115963 11/16/84 TtlAL.ATIN DEVELOPMENT CO.s INC. DATE 25.00 ATT SaRPARA L. -HARRISON AMOUNT 15300 S*W# 116TH AVE 4M TIGARD, OREGON 97223 .J F ►a►r,�U" wr.e►Tsi3OWr�xs M� H a► RFORfiANCE DOND � �� ow au o+m 0 LAI= aae�nivac� °'o'*s roUcv + oO now AMOUW OixrAlxr nr're�+ s INS 60944120 $3s138.00 2 O CITY OF TIGARD TERMt 10-23-64 UNTIL CANCELLED ra do TO AL ...".'off 240 JOHNSON &HIGGINS 4 i '` '!� �X' -yrt 3�z' � r;;=.a..i •to.s i r �t #�.+wri, .,j'if.sy�l,�j *,,"'.,. ra, i ". -4 a..`- ."F j �.Yi F.4 �.•R:i i« x3.n- r. •a w CHUBB &SON INC. Manager 7 FHuf3B 51 Jc.1.1. F Kennedy P-Irk--W SL • t F{ill t. Now Jt'Siy 0,0 It FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY SUBDIVISION PERFORHANCE BOND Bond No. _80944112.0 p/L- KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Tualatin Develo ent Com an . a Division of kis den Cor oration a Delaware Cor oration as r ucipa , anIt usiaess in t e a corporation duly out orize to conduct a genera surety State of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held bound unto the City of Tigard. Oregon a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called the obligee, in the sum of $ 3138.00.1 laxful money of the United States of America, for the payment o w is we, as Principal, and as Surety. jointly and severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS BOND AND OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that the Principals are completing sidevalk in Co r Cr ek Pt► e subdivision located in t e ty o gar , regon, on enter ng into a su >lvicion compliance agreement with the Obligee herein, and upon acceptance of said plat and compliance agreement, the Principals, shall make all improvements required bthe nt as describedoin Ordinances and documents reference, ma a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and truly observe and comply with the terms of the agreement and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be peformed under said agreement and shall promptly make payments to all persons supplying labor or material for any of the work provided by said agreement, and shall not permit any lien or shall to be filed or be voids otherwisestourioued emain is full forcinst the e andeeffectA this obligation In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to es tofalleother rightscand rremedies vhereuunderer under tthe he tCity,ointthe event his bond, in ion said contrat it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and for attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this 23rd_ day of Oct2ber , 19—Ati. Tualatin Development Company (seal) a Divisio U den Cor orat n IC By: eme y o ation By: By / regi eat By: al By: secretary mess or urety (Corporation acknowledgement of corporate Federal Insurance Company principal and a true rep; of the Power Surety of Attorney must be -s..sched to the original of this bond.) Ltarnty- - a G N•70a0 4aw! •��• POWER OF ATTORNEY COMPANY.16 Mountain VioW Road.Warren.Now densy.a Hierr Jorwy Corpora• ' Know am Man by thous iraeelndi.That Lha FEDERAL.uie 00� Nancy L. Kummer. Raymond B. White, James R. IIa2,ya Nn.has and appointed.and does hereby con sritute and appoint t y P. Walker and Leslie L. Rudat of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania— tar(--y "M eo Esnd dOm for an0 an Ms befnafi as WW Ch bs true d kwhA Arianeyao-Fact to execute under such designation in its Ronna and to titbr ks oorpoa�o aety tfnaroDn or othanNies.bonds of any of Me W0001frg du*".1,),w0: I t,aNrt,a Hied vrNh any SahWW or Magistrate.far the doing or not doing of arylihinG 1. Sonds and %ad in euM.Matter a prop "MV sny apecow in��or U=. tinareol.MncinNding ttnose r'aq�md or under�lswe or teaiNiations m Grgorrw S. Surety bonds to the United States of Arrwr mor any b oxxier tone laws.ordir►ar►ces or of sryl State. Tour►.ilNtage. W kMrAll iiaverwa:f.ioense sand PM"8ornde or� 'font rurnalfs End -Loa public bonds.ge V�• *m bor Whor body onds a!oua�bonda anted�bboW onds 10 of Noted"McmCu�a°Dut1► fl. Sands on b*AK of controcto(a in oormwedon wkh bids.pwpo"W corloacipt• a i1r Id�re M tr Aamlwra nAu Rrolorrn awe AarnNroa amawNne art w Ir torr"Wood.as,am raw"anuit"M coNN mom bra."MAN s Re%A--,Barrs aur rew� *WON aur r to baa"amu aw. 7th owe December Flow" my moQNrr AmMNIN»tproitiieomewi .O`Crrrr . ArIM1ra arrnwelr fiATI CP Mier.rpt aa. )Ou of SOn»rsat » ,Iran+rr o«a ar Naar rneNOrnd O.O Oaoro+b rs nam.r rd M es D"M 10 br AMMe"a+n.Wv d dr room"M Drew. 7th awe December warn.w.awawr.r+aera�reo.o�rser+aM+a`+,r•�re+�«.ew�n»ra.r�+a•�r sj"* "cow*m.rm awrmrra ammaa+aa in me rrrei►arKwe ear napemnS adolmeggeing Faso of AM-11VmW nese ada ermae rlermd M WAWA"a Ur ayisw 104, WLvnuVA E00WAWWdUwmraarwarmerhade.ara: rdecr..wurbaye ;wwom to raoa+rmodum iedleaMwroomarrMlr+rrAarrr+ t Md bsrmNny.are err tr r�rre ede Parr d A Mn'rr Id We rww.d Non"it Y.ere M�aOrr a ws fM�a+ ^OWN"lirMr rars@rd M any dWO •rate CariirM.aad awlil N+r alp�wr a ode Orap baa;are it dowse"vo—. *NNW$ue LEO AdaraMesaa aro 66M M idle*We an 00 d0e IlciraRr ---� iNatNry tewaae WCE 8 dE� HXAV PUOUC Of aw ms" STAww jwmv ue MY Camms:i°n E*m k"�°l T[o► county of sennenet Aro«r+r arNsaary at air IEaaRAL INSURANCE CONlAXV-40 69 rr�ah INR ti bdo ' else bNr arrapt bar Nhr lrisw d toes Ede N aempNsA M�►Imre ar Oraeaaa tr ew►rtetIANRb 1 t.IOU are 00 aw sr++r Y M iia/rue a"Demo' p MMrNNe 1/..t163 ats Did WON 000110161 arrw0me AMai• M arrea�atm+ribees.asramrr Nrrl err misawitia as,m.Mrn•am"We ares sr tamp d rlid oamiMry rNNA M is mama b!I Mr«ss awrr M armawis.raw rrmaraparmwrreawwow wdarMbNpalon,C- I y drwa M IaasrrM k rf INww" �hAm*1 t �rmNeMr. adam .area►srm raNear n oaairwomr• br aA arioa�a blue.wIw rrreiarm adlr ar/a tM110 a1MMld�1 f I ae1M a -"NMI -j1 vWA NaA%0r« 4M ice• *err Mesar d rrNrrrrr amrNMmd Nd/rhe log Bad artamattMIsw+adalarsrbwdeaOrUdialedOaaOaV ara+INNieNrn ataasUry•drANNlidrwwlaaerMrN °r 0 I aVior�wneaw r er+AmdNira Vb►hrdeay.IN�'w►! Iaeragwra•" 1bYarrawpireW NNelf®fRA6iNl/nAgCECOeIp/iCllrbe�rlsrrretltrarW t6NNrray«ygOwlbdarb.wi�derearwae+.tA+are EnmN.a3lriawo4OrskldCairrbor.tyrnmNbaas..d,as� wo„b�mrNd�maldeirdrogibnd?rbeem E.tirre h1Oak a+e ie are+wr Nargspbrmmdrde omMraramnfN.�trNdwmpm.ale•.trar�ednvausaeMbr. N.erridam4rdArNM"wSsaMrYd4t�EwU�atlrllrANCE001r1AMM.debre0r.r�MMprdwrlora road.erdAaar+arrw4lrbierrrbsipaa. LlWrrlrurwrirtadaneNwrrddrrldCarprrral Wana�NJ..r�.a ��►'Jflly y "� asnrmisomalss I an 0MRA1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY i AGENDA OF, 10-28-85 AGENDA ITEM #!: < �� 13 DATE SUBMITTED: 10-23-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of Aszman Street Improvement non- PREPARED BY: _ Randy S. Clarno, remonstrance agreement REQUESTED BY: Engineering DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: , CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE - INFORMATION SUMMARY Frank Aszman is partitioning land on the west side of SW 135th Avenue just across from Morning Hill subdivision. Road right-of-way was dedicated several years ago which brought the right-of-way up to standard. Conditions of approval included an executed street improvement non-remonstrance agreement for the improvement of SW 135th Avenue. Attached is this executed document for your review. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED t ti F SUGGESTED ACTION K ti Engineering recommends that Council accept this street improvement x non-remonstrance agreement and direct the City Recorder to have it recorded with Washington County. 2028P dm j INDIVIDUAL - GENERAL PARTNERSHIP CONSENT COVENANT (NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT) Street Improvements The undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby record their consent to the format'on of a local improvement district by the City of Tigard for the purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property abuts. The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to oppose or remonstrate against the ;ormation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the abutting street or streets, reserving only the right to contest the inclusion of particular cost items in the improvement district proceeding and any right they may have under the laws of the State of Oregon to contest the proposed assessment formula. The real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) has (have) hereunto set his (her) (their) hand(s) and seal(s), this 1,4 of C�kG7' , 192 . ^ (SEAL) (SEAL) i.--- (SEAL) _ (SEAL) r TATE �F OREGON ) r/ ) as. County of Washington ) BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this f6 day of Off)'' . 19_.8$ , before me, the undersigned Notary Putlic in and for the State of Oregon, personally appeared the within-named C� l}sz_m 'L: Aits 4107, Az— who is (are) known to me to be the identical individual(&) described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he (she) (they) executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and seal this /Q day of 19B�a (/�• �{y[/ Notary Public for Oregop'r"__-( (NOTARIAL'SE.AL) My Commission Expires: -1:361pqq Approved as to form this N day of By: Attorn y - C ty of Tigard ou Approved as to legal description this � day of c ."19g's . By: 4 bel. '. it 8nt4 - ty o igard Sew44w- Approved this _day of �t'o6 ,, CITY CO IL. CITY QTIIGGARD, OREGON By W t�+s City Recorder - City of Tigard r> (0206S) Westlake Consultants Inc. 7145 S.W. Vorns Rd. Tigard,* Oregon 97223 ® 503-684-0652 Frank Aszman Parcel 1 Project No. 270-01-85 Oct. 16, 1985 N LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in the N.W. 1/4, Section 4, T.2S., R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point that is South 02014/270 West, 335.00 feet and North 880251030 West, 35.00 feet from the north quarter corner of said Section 4, said point also being on the west right-of-way line of S.W. 135th Avenue (C.R. 934) as conveyed to the public and recorded in Book 1025, page 310, Washington County deed records; thence# parallel with the north line of said Section 4, North 88025/030 West# 150.00 feetf thence# parallel with the centerline of said S.W. 135th Avenue# South 02014'27w West, 75.00 feett thence# parallel with the north line of said Section 4, South 88025103" East, 150.00 feet to a point on the west right-of-way line of said 'S.W. 135th Avenue= thence, along said right-of-way line, North 020141270 East, 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. Basis of Bearing for legal description is C.S. 2i#399. ' Contains ll#249 square feet. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON JULY 12, 1979 } LEONARD 5CHELSKIt 1641 ENGINEERING / SURVEYING J PLANNING Westlake Consultants Inc. 7145 S.W. Vams fid. Tigard, Oregon 97223 ® REG I'STi RE Frank Aszman LAND SURVEYOR Parcel 2 Project No. 270-01-85 - Oct. 16, 1985 �,�� -�-" "/GaN-r.l O R EGO N J JULY 19. 1979 LEONARD SCNELSKY 1841 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in the N.W. 1/4, Section 4, T.2S.0 R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described! as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 4 that is North 88025103" West, 35.00 feet from the north quarter corner of said Section 4, said point also being on the west right-of-way line of S.W. 135th Avenue (C.R. - 934) as conveyed to the public and recorded in Book 1025, Page 310, Washington County deed records; thence, along the north line of said Section 4, North 88025103" West, 445.00 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of said S.W. 135th Avenue, South 02014127" West, 490.00 feet; thence, parallel with the north line of said Section 4, South 88025103" East, 445.00 feet to a point on the west right-of-way line of said S.W. 135th Avenue; thence, along said right-of-way line, North 02014127" East, 80.00 feet; thence, parallel with the north line of said Section 4, North 88025103" West, 150.00 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of said S.W. 135th Avenue, North 02014127" East, 75.00 fest; thence, parallel with the north line of said Section 4, South 88025103" East, 150.00 feet to a- pointon the west right-of-way line of said S.W. 135th Avenue; thence, along said right-of-way line, North 02014127" East, 335.00 feet to the point of beginning. Basis of Bearing for legal description is C.S. 21,399. Contains 4.747 acres. ENGINEERING / SURVEYING / PLANNING �YL t Q' ha�tlZs��v �F � w id.IL < r DY tA ( Cc- e p�- LL ° u�oa13 > 0- C6 n df 1-dxdka 00 .=> d C."il�ffl`A).-Zrrj I-C, vi Ili k4ftJWho 0 Ln OWOO Otl l oia�o�0 .c w •i _wM tlr. p�s -ao w t "'..r:; as•w.r Gsoi•sew __ :a�an oi- - ,}l. � � Q ' • ,OOYi44 ,9v' oova n 20, Its r �1 7- Z ° M LZ •b4„Z'G '1•c1 aN 'moo �0 �O t`� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 10-28-85 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: 10-23-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: Acceptance of Street ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of Dedication Compliance Agreement Rimkeit St. dedication 6 St. Non- PREPARED BY: Randy Clarno Remonstrance agreement: Also partial Bond release and partial fee refund REQUESTED BY: Engineering DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: I'''n`'1 " CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY The Rimkeit development is a 3 lot partition located on the west side of SW 121st Avenue just southerly of SW Howard Drive. Conditions of approval included road right-of-way dedication and half-street improvements or SW 121st Avenue. SW 121st Avenue is a County Road and recently certain improvement standard conflicts were encountered with the County. After meeting with the County about jurisdictional limitations and re-evaluating the Rimkeit development as well as certain City standards the following changes are recommended: (1) That Council accept an additional 5 feet of road right-of-way as presented on the attached street dedication document. (2) That Council accept the attached street improvement non-remonstrance agreement in lieu of half-street improvements. Engineering Divisions from both the City and County, after re-evaluation feel that this improvement is not timely and does not meet the long term vertical grade needs for this section of roadway. The County would also request that the sidewalk be installed now. The City Engineering Division sees no problem with this, with respect to future ultimate re-construction of this road. The sidewalk will be saved because of its separation with the curb. (3) Associated with items (1) and (2) above is a permit fee and bond which Mr. Rimkeit had paid and posted some time ago. The Engineering Division recommends that Council release all but $3600 of the cash performance bond. This will assure the installation of the sidewalks and required ditch and culvert cleaning. The permit fee was $1072.04 to compensate the City for plan review, documentation preparation and processing, inspection and map updating. Because the improvements will not be installed at this time, the latter two (inspection and map updating) will not be necessary. Therefore Engineering recommends that $600.00 of this permit fee be refunded to Mr. Rimkeit. SUGGESTED ACTION That the Council adopt the 3 recommendations above and terminate the Street Dedication Compliance Agreement. In addition, direct the City Recorder to have the attached documents recorded with Washington County. 2O28P/dmj a - INDIVIDUAL - GENERAL PARTNERSHIP CONSENT COVENANT (NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT) Street Improvements The undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby record their consent to the formation of a local improvement district by the City of Tigard for the purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property abuts. The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to oppose or remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the abutting street or streets, reserving only the right to contest the inclusion of particular cost items in the improvement district proceeding and any right they may have under the laws of the State of Oregon to contest the proposed assessment formula. The real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) has (have) hereunto set his (her) (their) hand(s) and seal(s) this day ofa- 19 . Wt4EAL) LL_prZC� pG(3rAL) �. (C (SEAL) �� — (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this day of before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, personally appeared the within-named dAealt L 7de—,-j. 1,V,1I-_ _':ri1JrZEoJc' w o is (are known to me to be the identical individual(s described in and who executed the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he (she) ha executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN T STIIMONY•WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ��`day o; w---��+ 19 qLY Notary Public for Oregon (NOTARIAL SEAL) My Commission Expires: c9 -,a 8-g z Approval as to form this 1 day of ` �• By: ri C Atto n y - C ty of Tigard 9V as . Approved as to legal description this day of G e By: •W�Z,- City j i earoxC ty o Tigard w� vr- Appproved this day of CITY COUNCIL, CITY•OF T/I�GARD. OREGON 61*,ftty Recorder City of Tigard O � : ( 2065) BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Civil Engineers e Land Surveyors If 302 Tigard Plaza • Hall Blvd.. Pacific Hwy. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503-639-6116 April 29, 1985 PARCEL 1 Job No. 85-169 Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; thence North 0°30' East along the West line of said Section 3 a distance of 1320 feet to the Southwest corner of that certain tract of land de- scribed in Book 179, page 117, deed records of Washington County; thence continuing along said West Section line North 0046' East 495.00 feet of the Southwest corner of "WILLAMETTE PLAT 2", a duly recorded 'subdivision; thence South 86055' East along the Southerly line of said Subdivision 1417.60 feet to a point in County Road No. 411 ; thence South 29°26100" West along the centerline of said County Road_599.30 feet to the most Easterly Southeast corner of that certain tract of land last described in Book 283, page 505, deed records of Washington County; thence North 7642'00" West along the Southerly line of said last-mentioned tract 259.74 feet to an angle point thereon; thence South 30026120" West 100.23 feet to an angle point on the Northerly line of that certain tract of land last described under Parcel III in deed to Gordon Moore, et ux, as recorded in Book 418, page 644, deed records of Washington County, said point also being the most Northerly corner of that certain tract of land described in deed to Robert Kennedy and Jean Kennedy, husband and wife, in Book 730, page 630, deed records of Washington County; thence South 61022130" West 18.30 feet along the North line of said Kennedy tract to the North- west corner thereof; thence South 0"25'00" West along the West line of said Kennedy tract 116.84 feet of the True Point of Beginning of the following described parcel of land; thence continuing South 0025'00" West along the West line of said Kennedy tract 133.76 feet to the South- West corner thereof; thence South 83000'00" East along the South line of said Kennedy tract 129,16 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of County Road No. 411 ; thence North 29026'00" East along said Westerly right of way line 143.77 feet; thence North 83000'00" West, parallel to the South line of said Kennedy tract 199.35 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0.501 Acres. 1 a BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors , 302 Tigard Plaza a Hall Blvd. R Pacific Hwy. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503-639-6116 April 29, 1985 PARCEL z rx/-//Jg/7- �� Al 7) JOB No. 85-169 Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; thence North 0030' East along the West line of said Section 3 a distance of 1320 feet to the Southwest corner of that certain tract of land de- scribed in Book 179, page 117, deed records of Washington County; thence continuing along said Test Section line North 0°46' East 495.00 feet to the Southwest corner of "WILLAMETTE PLAT 2", a duly recorded subdivision; thence South 86055' East along the Southerly line of said Subdivision 1417.60 feet to a point in County Road No. 411 ; thence South 29026'00" West along the centerline of said County Road .599.30 feet to the most easterly southeast corner of that certain tract of land last described in Book 283, page 505, deed records of Washington County; thence North 76042'00" West along the Southerly line of said last-ment- ioned tract 259.74 feet to an angle point thereon; thence South 30°26'20" West 95.05 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the following described parcel of land; thence continuing South 30°26'20" blest 5.18 feet to an angle point on the Northerly line of that certain tract of land last de- scribed under Parcel III in deed to Gordon Moore, et ux, as recorded in Book 418, page 644, deed records of Washington County, said point also being the most Northerly corner of that certain tract of land described in deed to Robert Kennedy and Jean Kennedy, husband and wife, in Book 730, page 630, deed records of Washington County; thence South 61°22'30" West 18.30 feet along the North line of said Kennedy tract to the North- west corner thereof; thence South 0025100" West along the West line of said Kennedy tract 116.84 feet; thence South 83°00'00" East, parallel to the South line of said Kennedy tract 199.35 feet to a point on the West- erly right of way line of County Road No. 411 ; thence North 29°26'00" East along said right of way line 113.68 feet; thence North 76°42'00" West, parallel to the Southerly line of the aforementioned tract in Book 283, page 505, deed records of Washington County, a distance of 240.66 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0.627 Acres. i. BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , LandSurveyors ors Civil Engineers Y 302 Tigard Plaza • Hall Blvd.&Pacific Hwy. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • 503-539-6116 April 29, 1985 rxlllgl-r '14 an PARCEL 3 Job No. 85-169 Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 3, Township 2 South, .Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; thence North 0°30' East along the West line of said Section 3 a distance of 1320 feet to the southwest corner of that certain tract of land des- cribed in Book 1,79, page 117, deed records of Washington County; thence continuing along said West Section line North 0°46' East 495.00 feet to the Southwest corner of "WILLAMETTE PLAT 2", a duly recorded sub- division; thence South 86.55' East along the Southerly line of said Subdivision 1417.60 feet to a point on County Road No. 411 ; thence South 29026100" West along the centerline of said County Road 599.30 feet to the most Easterly Southeast corner of that certain tract of land last described in Book 283, page 505, deed records of Washington 2' 00" West along County; thence North T6°4the Southerly line of said last-mentioned tract 20.82 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the following described parcel of land; thence continuing North 76°42'00" = point; thence South 30026'20" West 95.05 West 238.92 feet to an angle feet; thence South 76042'00" East, parallel to the Southerly line of that certain tract of land described in Book 283, page 505, deed re- cords of Washington County, a distance of 240.66 feet to a paint on r the Westerly right of way line of County Road No. 411 ; thence North 29°26'00" East along said right of way line 94.55 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 0.500 Acres. i j 1 ;i Vi \ 13B y1 'ha PARCEL s ��. AREA:GROSS , 0.300 Ac. o _ NE r +a478 Ac / •c -- 1 -� S t`s'42•p0. pyh�0�yh �� _:y AREA,,GROSS a 0.681 At °a> p ser a 0,601 At PARCEL Z �'+ � joust p• �ti b° a S 9J'Op 00"E . r®B.J r � 2c.35• r t� S' 1' '^ PA RCE'L M AREA:GROSS, d SOI At Ater , OI6eAc .N �Sa00'00 !Y_ ltsip. SCALE /"s 40' f is APRI L Ives r✓ELO� ♦fir..6,6' o a5 eeNl r.V aclR / • s SIrl.e',3t"ren Abo-a-e✓ ' � Ys/io✓a/es••eCeeJn�trlee r INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP STREET DEDICATION KNOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that 1 gu TRCJgfiJ"G EyGr£i�lE �Z:M KElT a OH m !>70 P- TO hereby dedicate to the Public a perpetual sight-of-way for street, road and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along and within the following described real property in Washington County, Oregon: To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public forever for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the owner(s) in far simple and the property is fres of all liens and encumbranceas they have good and legal right to grant the rights above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property- The amount paid for this dedie+zi-n is S IN W TNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) has (have) hereunto set his (her) (their) hand( ) nd seals ) th sr day of ti • (SEAL) O 1 0 (SEAL) - D (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) �-r�✓g, �f . 192L- personally 9.8-personally appeared the above named NAri R IJ 7"M1911- I � T who executed this instrument and each of them acknowledged to me that, this netrument vas'exeeuted voluntarily and freely. �J Notary Publ c for Oregon My Commission expires: 9-•P?-87 ACCEPTANCE Approved as to form this day of 0 - 19�`? sy= .. t Attorn y - Tiry Af Tigard Approved as to legal description this 23 0day of Qt�v 19 5 i By City -'Cityaf Tigard wt�ar Accepted by the City Council this =�day of � Y . 1 CI�Iweolldc--"' Y of GARD.•OREG.ON - C ty o T ward (1704A) (7-g4) EXHIBIT "A" Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; thence North 0030' East along the West line of said Section 3 a distance of 1320 feet to the Southwest corner of that certain tract of land described in Book 179, page 117, deed records of Washington County; thence continuing along the West section line North 0446' East 495.00 feet to the Southwest corner of "WILLAMETTE PLAT 2", a duly recorded subdivision; thence South 86455' East along the Southerly line of said Subdivision 1417.60 feet to a point in County Road No. 411; thence South 29026'00" West along the centerline of said County Road 599.30 feet to the most Easterly Southeast corner of that certain tract of land last described in Book 283, page 505, deed records of Washington Count ; . thence North 76042'00" West along the Southerly line of said last-mentioiwl tract 20.82 feet to a point on the existing Westerly right-of-way line of County Road No. 411, and the true Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said Southerly line a distance of 15.63 feet, North 76442'00" West; thence South 29026'00" West, parallel to and 15.00 feet Westerly of said Westerly right-of-way line a distance of 353.24 feet to a point on the South line of that certain tract of land described in deed to Robert Kennedy and Jean Kennedy, husband and wife, in Book 730, page 630, deed records of Washington County; thence South 83400'00" East along the South line of said Kennedy tract 15.82 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of said County Road No. 411, thence North 29426'00" East along said Westerly right-of-way line 352.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. (RC:pm/1948P) 9i /•� .-8q�h i o ?Jal 92• 2aB3j, G 9 iL �0 PARCEL .3 ARCA..GROSS r 0 300 AC. NE r r O 07B 4c 1 4a 0Q"F 1�94y Q, 4 h 64 �• 240 d6?3p?S L0�4p/4 i AREA GROSS r O.6,P7 Ac NET a 0607 Ac 9 4 f i s.ae O V' n S 83'00'00" E PARCEL 4RE4:GROSS= 0 50/4c N£7 r 016S4c ire Is.00 00 „w b �' r •'a Sg R. w Olec9M SC4LF /•`r i0' 24 AOR/L 1985 05./69 fq f✓BLCJ . .. ---�. �oC EGr'Na F.- �sea�a e.f T4s rs nss t••J LB 990 lt' 1 d`y/ry1/ d