The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 08/19/1985 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate AUGUST 19, 1985, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start 10865 SW WALNUT of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items TIGARD, OREGON 97223 are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less; longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by con— tacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 -Call To Order and Stoll Call 1.2 Pledge of; Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non—Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. PRESENTATION OF KEY TO THE CITY o City Administrator 4. TUALATIN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT o Chief Pittard 5. QUARTERLY VISIT o Commissioner Rogers 6. MSTIP_- RESOLUTION NO. 85- 0 Community Development Director 7. ANNEXATION PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT — RESOLUTION NO. 85—_ a City Administrator 8. HALL BLVD./BURNHAM LID #85-01 — RESOLUTION OF INTENT (II) NO. 85- 0 Project Engineer — Stu Cato 9. POLICY REVIEW CALENDAR o City Administrator 10. BUDGET CONCERNS City Administrator .1 Police Budget Review .2 Retirement Conversion .3 Library .4 Engineering Services .5 Parks .6 General Government .7 Furnishings .8 Contingency 11. OUT—OF—TOWN TRAVEL DISCUSSION o City Administrator 12. CABLE TV RENEGOTIATIONS REPORT o Councilor Scott COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 19,''1985 PAGE 1' 13. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion Anyone may request that an item be removed- by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 13.1 Approve Council Minutes - July 29, 1985 13.2 Receive and File Community Development Quarterly Report 13.3 Approve Name Change OLCC Application - Sherwood Inn Restaurant to Sherwood Inn Restaurant, Inc. 15700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, Lake Oswego, OR (DA License) 13.4 Receive and File Community Development Land Use Decisions 13.5 Approve Resolution No. 85-59 Denial of Barron Construction - Chatterly - half street improvement condition waiver 13.6 Receive and File Crusin' Tigard '85 Report 13.7 Receive and File County Road Acceptance Report 13.8 Approve Personnel Rules Amendment Re: Layoff Status -• Resolution No. 85-60 13.9 Receive and File O'Mara/Frewing Traffic Report 13.10 Deny Jacob's Refund Request M 5-85 13.11 Approve Calling Public Hearing - Tigard Street/Mull Street Vacation - Resolution No. 85-61 13.12 Approve Calling Public Hearing - Walnut Place/99W Street Vacation -. Resolution No. 85-62 13.13 Approve Calling Public Hearing - 74th Avenue Street Vacation - Resolution No. 85--63 13.14 Approve Calling Public Hearing 122nd Avenue Street Vacation Resolution No. 85-64 13.15 Approve Calling Public Hearing - 67th & Clinton Street Vacation - Resolution No. 85-65 13.16 Accept Public Improvements In Bond Park I Subdivision - Resolution No. 85-66 13.17 Accept S & J Builders Street Dedication & Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement - SW Springwood Drive Area 13.18 Receive & File - Planning Commission Resolution Re: SW 135th 13.19 Approve Anton Park (Phase I) Partial Release of Monies - Resolution No. 85-67 13.20 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Mallard Lakes Subdivision Compliance Agreement & Performance Bond 13.21 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Shadow Hills II Subdivision Performance Bond 13.22 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Tech Center (Phase II) Sanitary Sewer Compliance Agreement 13.23 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Labor Relations Consultant Contract With Scott & Associates through FY 85-86 13.24 Approve Board and Committee Appointments 14. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff, Added By Council Motion or Set to Future Agendas 15. CIVIC CENTER REPORT o City Administrator & Committee 16. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.550.,1) (d) & (h) to discuss labor relations and litigation issues. 17. ADJOURNMENT lw/3097A COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 19, 1985 PAGE TIGAR' D CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Phil - Edin, Jerry Edwards, and Ima Scout; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim ,Ramis, Legal Counsel; and L.oreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder, 2. CALLTOSTAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator recommended modifying the agenda as follows: Item ##7 & 8 Table to 8/26/85 Item ##13.9 Intent is to install two traffic signs now at the intersection of Frewing & O'Mara Item 013.23 - Approve agreement with 'a cap of $5,000 Item ##,1 Under Non-Agenda Items - Discuss Meeting Agendas to determine which meetings Council may lack a quorum. 3 VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Mr. Nal Lyster, Summerfield citizen, expressed concern regarding timely release of public records which were requested through Council-designated respondent, Councilor Edin, Councilor Edin stated that he advised Mr. Lyster, prior, to his vacation, that `upon return to the City he would prepare a packet of information for Mr. Lyster. b. Mr. Emmett Whitaker, NPO ##1 Chairman, requested a fee waiver for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment the NPO wished to file with the Planning Department. Staff suggested that staff could support such a request if the CPA request was filed at the semi-annual revision time. Consensus of Council was to consider this issue on the next agenda to allow staff time to meet with NPO ##1 and work out details of timing. 4. PRESENTATION OF KEY TO THE CITY a. City Administrator presented 'Key to the City' from Auburn Washington. Mayor Bob Roagner of that City sent this to the Mayor and thanked the Council for the new City Engineer they had hired, Frank Currie, who had served as Tigard's Engineer for a number of years. b. Consensus of Council was that a key from Tigard would be sent to Auburn's Mayor. Staff will prepare. 5. TUALATIN RURAL. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT a. Acting Chief Pittard from the fire district appeared to introduce himself to the Council. He suggested that the two taxing entities try to turn mutual concerns into mutual advantages and expressed desire to work together in addressing this issues. Page ;i - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 1985 6, QUARTERLY VISIT - Washington County Commissioner Rogers a. Commissioner Rogers discussed items accomplished in, the last few months in Washington County including, addressing double taxation issues, Police, Planning, and county _support of infa-structures i.e. sewers and streets). A short question/answer period followed with Council, 7, MSTIP - RESOLUTION NO. 85- a. Community Development Director gave an overview of the Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program as proposed by the County. The project would include about $62 million of County funds, funded through a serial levy or a bond issue, with about $30 million in matching funds from Federal and State support. b, Mark Padgett, representative of the Transportation Committee, advised Council of their concerns regarding the projects highlighted for the Tigard area and noted the Committee voted on 8/1/85 to not endorse the project as it currently stands. c City Administrator stated that there are now some alternate projects being recommended by Beaverton and that it may be timely for Tigard to address some alternative needs for this area. d, Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to table to 9/9/85 for further information. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 8. ANNEXATION PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 85- a. Consensus of Council was to table issue for consideration on the 8/26/85 agenda. 9, HALL BLVD./BURNHAM LID - 085. 01 - RESOLUTION OF INTENT (PHASE II) a. Consensus of Council was to table issue for consideration on the 8/26/85 meeting. 10. POLICY REVIEW CALENDAR a. City Administrator presented Council's revised policy review calendar and recommended Council adoption with the understanding that staff would then prepare budget adjustments to implement the policy_change, b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Edin to approve calendar as presented. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. il. BUDGET CONCERNS a. City Administrator discussed at length some suggested revisions to the 85-86 budget which would allow staff to implement the policy calendar as adapted. Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 19, 1985 b. After lengthy discussion, the following items received votes: ' o Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Scott to accept principle of no change in the Police Department budget and authorization to hire two patrolpersons as close to 9/1/85 as possible and then make further necessary budget adjustments through the control budget process with Councilors Edwards and Brian. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. o Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Mayor Cook to appropriate the WCCLS levy revenue and adopt the library line-item expenditures as presented by staff. Motion failed with a 2--1-1 deadlock vote of Council present. Councilor Edwards and Mayor' Cook voting aye; Councilor Scott voting nay: Councilor Edin abstaining. Concern was expressed regarding the extra expenditure allocation requested for library furnishings. Councilor Edin's understanding was that the monies would be returned to general fund contingency upon they passage of the WCCLS levy. o Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve the Engineering Services report and approve funding an additional two engineering positions based on increased revenues generated by that department. nate of Council present. Councilor Approved by a 3-1 majority Scott voting nay. a Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve the request by the Park Board for funding a Park's Crew Chief position at this time. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. o Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards, to approve a contract to be signed with Don Scott for labor negotiation service with a cap of $5,000.00 and authorizing the City Administrator to sign said contract. Approved by a 3--1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. o Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to table remainder of budget issues/requests to a meeting agenda in September. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. c. City Administrator stated resolutions would be placed on next agenda to appropriate funds as directed RECESS: 9:50 P.M. RECONVENE: 10:04 P.M. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 1985 12. OUT-OF-TOWN TRAVEL DISCUSSION a. City Administrator requested that Council set policy on approving out-of-town travel requests by staff over $100 as suggested by the Budget Committee. b. Council voted on the current requests pending, and stated the policy issue would be discussed at a later meeting. o Fingerprint Schooling PoliceDepartment - Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Motion approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Edin voting nay. o Court Clerk Training Conference - Municipal Court -- Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Edin to approve. _ Motion approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council. present. Councilor Scott voting nay. o Burglary Assn. School - Police Department - Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Edin to no approve the class request. Motion to deny request approved by a 3--1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay, 13. CABLE TV RENEGOTIATIONS REPORT a. Councilor Scott stated that she would discuss further regarding renegotiation efforts during executive session scheduled for 8/21/85 under pending litigation section of the ORS, 14. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 14.1 Approve Council Minutes - July 29, 1985 14.2 Receive and File - Community Development Quarterly Report 14.3 Approve Name Change OLCC Application - Sherwood Inn Restaurant to Sherwood Inn Restaurant, Inc. , 15700 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, Lake Oswego, OR (DA License) 14.4 Receive and File Community Development Land Use Decisions 14.5 Approve Resolution No. 85-59 Denial of Barron Constriction - Chatterly half street improvement condition waiver 14.6 Receive and File Crusin' Tigard 185 Report 14.7 Receive and File County Road Acceptance Report 14.8 Approve Personnel Rules Amendment Re: Layoff Status - Resolution No. 85-60 14.9 Receive and File O'Mara/Frewing Traffic Report 14.10 Deny Jacob's Refund Request - M 5-85 14.11 Approve Calling Public Hearing - Tigard Street/Mull Street Vacation Resolution No. 85-61 14.12 Approve Calling Public Hearing - Walnut Place/99W Street Vacation Resolution No. 85-62 Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES 'AUGUST 19, 1985 14.13 Approve Calling Public Hearing 74th Avenue Street Vacation - Resolution No. 85-63 14.14 Approve Calling Public Hearing 122nd Avenue Street Vacation - Resolution No. 85-64 14.15 Approve Calling Public Hearing - 67th & Clinton Street Vacation _Resolution No. 85-65 14.16 Accept Public Improvements In Bond Park I Subdivision Resolution No. 85-66 14.17 Accept _S & J Builders Street Dedication & Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement SW Springwood Drive Area 14.18 Receive & File Planning Commission Resolution Re: SW 135th 14.19 Approve Anton Park (Phase I) Partial Release of Monies Resolution No. 85-67 14.2.0 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Mallard Lakes Subdivision Compliance Agreement & Performance Bond 14.21 Approve & _Authorize Signatures: Shadow Hills II Subdivision Performance Bond 14.22 Approve , & Authorize Signatures- Tech Center (Phase II) Sanitary Sewer Compliance Agreement 14.23 Approve & Authorize Signatures: Labor Relations Consultant Contract With Scott 6 Associates through FY 85-86 14 .24 Approve Board and Committee Appointments a. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to approve consent agenda with the exception of item .6 which will be tabled for discussion , on the 9/16/85 Council agenda, and with the clarification of action requests as outlined by the Administrator under the 'Gail To Staff' section of the meeting earlier. T Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 15. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 15.1 City Administrator discussed which meetings would be attended by each Councilor to determine whether a quorum would be obtainable for the next month's meetings as Councilor Brian was ill and would be unavailable for attendance in the near future. Consensus of Council was to reset items scheduled for the 8/26/85 meeting to 9/4/85 and 9/9/85. Staff will renotify press and citizens. Consensus of Council was to call a special meeting of Council on August 21, 1985 at 7:00 P.M. for Executive Session purposes for Labor Relations and pending litigation issues under ORS 192.660 (1) (d) & (h). 15. CIVIC CENTER REPORT a. Present from the Civic Center Committee were: Chairperson Valerie r.. Johnson; Committee-members, Dennis Derby & Craig Hopkins. b. City Administrator reported that the project is proceeding well, however architect. indicates the timeline is very tight. Additional discussion will be held in Executive Session regarding pending litigation. 4; Page 5 COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 19, 1985 RECESS: 10:22 P.M. .,, RECONVENE: 10:25 P.M. k 16. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) & (h) to discuss labor, relations and litigation issues. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: 11:27 P.M. RECONVENE REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION: 11:27 P.M. 17. LITIGATION/LABOR ISSUES a. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Edin to call up from LUBA the S & J Appeal to be heard on the record at the September 9, 1985 Council Meeting. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. b. Motion by Councilor Edwards, seconded by Councilor Scott to elect the 7K Exemption under FLSA for law enforcement personnel. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 18. ADJOURNMENT: 11:29 P.M. 4fexputyCity Recorder — City of Tigard ATTEST: r- - City of Tigard lw/8133A Paige 6 — COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 19, 1985 TIMES PUBLISHINGCOMPANY Legal 7 tice -6468 �. P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Noc- BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075- Legal Notice Advertising � �� • 0 Tearsheet NoticeC/�y�18199 City of Tigard • PO Box 23397 • © Duplicate Affidavit T/DRQ Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' 1 Jacquelyn Agee being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising Director,or his principal clerk,of the Tigard Times = a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020;published atTigard— in the aforesaid county and state;that the City Council Special Meeting a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire Issue of said newspaper for I successive and consecutive in the following issues: August 15_, 1985 1 kr r A st 15 , x.985 �d Subscribett a rn tb of®re me this n �rl Notary Public for Oregon My Coia3100 Ekpor rnme't: 9'/2 0/8 8 AFFInAVIT dim VIM4 Y '. 1.3 9�dY/ tr ,f zi y 1PISITQR'S AGENDA DATE AGENDFi'ITE�"t`!. less. please) (Limited to 2'minutes or ase sign on the appropriate sheet for listed on he agenda, but askse Council thaty�ou to hear from please You on other issues not wishes , first try to resolve your. .concerns through staff. - Please contact the City.. Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED NAME & ADDRESS r Jw � f�'f.l 1 . �e..5 i r-. t,t..!'• i:c'!"t('��p^s(/=,.afS(U�% (�L.�� CA All u x 4�x r T, T-----, Trot r , Y r 77 INNt y r CITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE MAYOR _ 25 WEST MAIN, AUBURN, WA 98001 (7 BOB ROEGNER, MAYOR (206)931-3041 August 6, 1985 The Honorable John Cook Mayor, City of Tigard 12755;S.W. Ash Avenue P.O. "Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mayor Cook: First of all, I would like to,apologize for stealing Frank Currie from your city; however, we are extremely pleased to have him as a member of our city administration and it is clear Tigard has prepared him well. CJ In talking with Frank, he informed me the City of Tigard has I would very much like to receive one of a key-to-the-city. your keys-to-the-city and have enclosed one of ours with a certificate making �temsou nofothisrnaturecitizen. with other cities have always cities enjoyed exchanging and would appreciate your consideration. My best wishes you and the members of the council. Sicr , Bob Roegner Mayor BR/jrh Enclosures JC8.6 Y 571P x�. r a t ,$ 4 E b 1 �N�y;'�.t�r1' e� k, t,., a'." — F1`. h K^5.x �T....�•�,W.�. - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19. 1985 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED August 14, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Received preliminary ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Nall/Burnham, engineering report L.I.D. PREPARED BY: Duane Roberts REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE The Hall/Burnham LID preliminary engineering report was reviewed by Council on 5/24/85. A decision was made to refer the report to the Transportation Advisory Committee for a recommendation regarding alternative right-of-way improvement standards from center line. The transportation committee meeting 7/31/85 -unanimously recommended adoption of an overall right-of--way width of -40 ft. , with a minimum of 30 feet to be dedicated and 10 feet to be 'given in the form of a sidewalk and/or permanent roadway easement. INFORMATION SUMMARY Stuart Cato will be present to answer Council questions. A map showing the area covered by the proposed LID was included in the 6/24!85 Council packet. If additional copies are needed, please contact Loreen by Monday noon. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Choose between alternative right-of-way standards and proceed to the next stage of the L.I.D. process: adoption of a resolution of intent and setting the date for the public hearing. 2. Ask for additional study. 3. Alter the recommendation and proceed. 4. Do nothing. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends Council select R.O.W. standard and proceed to the next stage, formation, by adoption of a resolution of intent and setting the date for the public hearing. (1735P) . N � ; CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 85— DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN HALF—STREET' STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETLRMINED TO BE SW HALL/BURNHAM IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SW HALL/BURNHAM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR HALF—STREET STREET IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL COST THEREOF; DEFINING THE BOUNDARY; THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND ASSESSED: APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S EN"INEER; AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted Non—remonstrance-agreements, petitions requestion half—street improvements and has ordered preparation of a preliminary engineering report, pursuant thereto, at the Council's regular meeting of October 16, 19e4, and WHEREAS, _pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council finds it expedient and necessary to order the improvement of the hereinbelow described lands by construction of half street facilities and appurentances thereto, and,pursuant thereto the City's Engineer has submitted to the Council plans, specifications and estimates for the work to be done and the probable cost thereof together with a statement of the lots, ;parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefited and the apportionment of the total cost of the improvements which each of said lots, parts of the lots and parcels of land shall be assessed on account of the benefits derived; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said plans, specifications and estimates are satisfactory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: (a) That the City Council does hereby deem it expedient and necessary, and does- hereby declare its intention to improve the aforesaid portion of SW Hall/Burnham by construction of curb, sidewalk, street, storm sewer, and appurtenance thereto. (b)_ That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the attached "Exhibit A" are determined and declared to be a street. Improvement assessment district, to be known as SW Hall/Burnham Improvement District, and it is further declared that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefited by said improvements, and that the ' total estimated cost of $253,000.00 for said improvements shall - be assessed in full, on a front footage and area basis, against all lands within said improvement district. (c) That the plans, specifications ;and estimates with respect to the improvememts as submitted by the City's Engineers be, and the same are hereby i adopted and ordered to be 'maintained on file by the City Recorder for public inspection. a RESOLUTION NO. 85-- Page 1 (d) That Monday, the 9th day of September, 1985, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon, be, and the same are hereby set as the time and place for hearing and considering objections or remonstrances to the proposed improvement by any parties aggreived thereby. (e) That the City Recorder be, and she is hereby, directed to give notice by causing to have this resolution published in the Tigard Times, issues of August 29, 1985 and September 5, 1985 (f) Within ten days from the date of the first publication of the notice of this resolution of the owners of 66 2/36 or more in area of the property within the boundaries described on "EXHIBIT A" hereto attached, may make and file with the City Recorder a written objection or remonstrance against the proposed improvements. PASSED: This day of 1985. Mayor — City of Tigard ATTEST Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard (1737p) RESOLUTION NO. 85— EXHIBIT „A., Description of Assessment and district boundary for Local Improvement District R 85-1 (Hall—Burnham) A -tract of land located in the East half of Section 2, Township'2 South, Range 1' West, W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; said tract being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the north line of SW O'Mara St eet (County 'Road No. 567) with the west line of SW Hall Blvd. (County Road No. 227) thence North 440 38' 00" West "280 feet, more or less to a point that is 220 feet west of the west line of said SW Hall Blvd. (when =s measured at right angles); thence parallel with the west -line of said SW Hall Blvd. 970 feet, more or less, to the south line of that tract of land conveyed to Robert and Marilyn Hudson and recorded in document No. 78-55052, Washington County Deed records, thence on the boundary of said Hudson tract North 890 00' 00" west 70 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner thereof; thence 'North 01° - 30' East 160 feet to the ;r south line of SW Burnham Street (County Road No. 997); thence on the south M linea of said Burnham Street South 890 00' 00" East 170 feet, more or .k less, to 'the west line of the relocated SW Hall Blvd. , thence southesterly and southerly on said relocated line and the west line of County Road No. 227-1350 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that: portion of property along SW Hall Blvd. and SW Burnham Street that will be dedicated as public road right—of--way. (RSC:bs/1725P) s .. .. j A fit,-�.;:n.•9r.`..,.,...,.d,,, wwr,,, ..,t _ _ _ _:-s. ....m..,--.,.z� :.,+a..+n^M�.ar,1��fr'tr r .M ov c (Sl M�e��n Dade: C� 00 - l9 -85 - q Pip a►i[ tit ry t t t t t r t t t t r r t 1 t t 1 T — __ _ , r'�rTmfmlt��r��t11j►i�r�tjtjt��t�tlt�t��r(int►tEtfr[+"ti�t�t�t�tjt{tii��le{t't�titta�t�tjt�l�tit�tat't�tjtti�t�tjtlt�tit�Frt ? ,, NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED _.�_ __.O Z .� 4 __- _ S - - s_ . T S g 0 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - --- - 06 63 sZ LZ sz sz- oz ez zzlz OZ 6t BI LI --91 —Sf- bt et zl 11 —oi 6 ® 1 9 s 5 .__c_ _._Z �tutlui inl�yi t t1.1111t 1LItiIlr�ilH Ott auluu anleu uuNut . ARCH 7_ - 1990 , ARD CxTy I DEPARTMENT WORK PROGRAM DEPARTMENT DIVISION/SECTION T!r ; FYS–RE, MANAGER C rYO/17SnI. PERSOiv/vlOrP,, PROJECT/ACTIVITY JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN ��°� ►�IR`/�C��552�� J . TTCL Canojnn/ Q .GG: '8 �l+d`/ BUDGET S00 a5A •C�M�x�:��uJ ��-� AFS.:�.��,_ NAiv08 �i- ;oE — s w 'r3/ Opo - EuJ Rt �s�ctl f. �!!rr, pRoPosr�c CA � uws,,.cc.,.tea °t`�JGMl•�+�i�Nf1/.� �•,••�ne,C +F�+rr,.. „cA �i'Y!+•°GISb�S ' "Crrn r2ut,ES Luetav4 REtisf. ,;.11(J1hT,,�X �coo�rsvgra=wzTq — — — cx-ry • 5p iv� 2K1 t_S &k22WR'Ally'I N/ft ��,yy RouG{l(,,pq,-r �n��am1., S7pf,��tA CG(�utFl✓ F>�.�... C�AGb S7�F 7�. SGS r~ A �v� OSSA } E PSV 0^N �.51C'`iy5FlJ A v 577-10fJ_ _�(Y� S 1vGw,, ou m c — — — (7 7 6�Q A. . �5��'`C/•1 ) T��Tr� PQ��e4'v► z SNP O A3 C .VFJIFO mJ`r 'E]iL1'Uaf (PGE # q44a,C pmns-fP xs-9JANq rlAvq( n `J`A Z cemrnw�s o a o _ I.ABoQ A 0/6 �sco7T TbPTlb�„ 1 7 �e�� { air Ioa a..ja e { o a a I n — �r ...�. -P.I C rrj�r�rlfllli��it{tll{IIT�irtilal{Ij[{1{Mal�tli�ip�tlt�llt�la��rlr{tNO�I'�tlt��it{tir{Nl�tar�tlr{r�t�►pl NOTE: IF'THIS MICROFILMED - - -- �- Z 3 4 _ _ 5 6 _ 7 8 3 0 I I t2 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN �� Z . THIS NOTICE. IT IS DLE TO _.. THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. Z dZZ b2 EZ 2Z IZ OZ tiP 81 LJ 91 S!- �+1 E! ZI 'it OI –IS 8 d 9 S b E Z !M+it R lulltu{xnlut_ �� }}£ 6Z 8 iMlitlil�lirl{INI�IIitl_. i �.M ' _ j990 MARCH! 7 a - �s. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Counm.l August 15, 1985 FROM: -Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Policy Calendar and Tentative Ag as Attached is an updated Policy Calendar and Tentative Agenda schedule. Due to the cancellation of the 8/12/85 Council meeting, the August and September schedules has jammed up considerably. Some of the discussion topics which we may need more time on are: o Civic Center — Soils Dispute o Tabor Relations (Originally set 8/12) o Salary and Benefits (originally set 8/19, now 10/21) 83:1w/3098A M1 yl y ¢ v A 5 U tf ot cm wl r LG I[ r o � m o J a a� a� 3 _ W 7t tp 15 a g _ c a i o - d .. e t a s a 9S u a u u v - xii u+ mq " a • o q • ♦ • • • • • • O q o P g P o P g O P q o o q O- a T R 12 Updated 8/12/85 Page'1 TENTATIVE AGENDAS CITY COUNCIL SM RM RM SM S5 RM SS RM SS RM ITEM WHO? 8/19 8/26 9/09 9/11 9/16 9/23 9/30 10/14 10/21 10/28 LATER 'NOTES____._.___ 1. Minutes Ln oree _� C C C C C C C C Aug Sept 2. Dept. Reports Update LID Report _ Staff Jud_ C 3 Board 6 Committee Appointments Staff C C , C C C C C C 4 Accept Public Improeent vms __ Randy _ 5. Executive Session Staff XX X 6 OLCC Applications Loreen C X 7 Keys To City Donna X W/___C CCA__ _____ ._.._,- 8 Civic Center Project Report (w/Committee) Bob 3 X X C_ C C C 9 C C Community Development land (Ise Decisions Bill C C CX X Spring 10. Personnel Rules Discussion/Accruals Bob J C C 11 Commissioner Rogers X 12 County Road Acceptance Discussion/Report Bill X 13. MSTIP Resolution Bill C 14 CAN Renegotiations Report ___ Ima S X � x 15 X Library Furnishings Bid Irene _ — C X 16 Civic Center Furnishings Bid JOY_ X X WCCLS-6 Supp NOV 17 Budget Revisions/Supplemental Jerri X C X 18 Bill Scholls Ferry Road Plan/APAA X X 19` O'Mara/Frewing Traffic Report Bill C 20. Hall Blvd/Burnham LID H85-01 Bill X PH? PH? DUE TO WP/SS FOR TYPING 8/9 8/16 8/30 9/6 9/13 9/20 10/4 10/11 10/1B DUE TO LOREEN AT NOON READY FOR PACKETS 8/14 8/21 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 10/9 10/16 10/23 2426A Updated 8/12/85 Page 2 TENTATIVE AGENDAS - CITY COUNCIL SM RM RM SM SS RM SS RM SS RM ITEM WHO? 8119 8/26 9/9 9/11 9/16 9/23 9/30 10/14 10/21 10/28 LATER NOTES 1, Chatterly Appeal - Denial Resolution Bill C 2 Crusin' Tigard '85 Report Kelly _ C 3. Police Budget Review Bob A X X_ 4. Retirement Conversion Discussion Jerri X _ 5. Out-of-town Travel Discussion Bob J X 6 Work Programs Bob J X C 7 Policy Review-Calendar _ Bob J X X Quarterly (Nov) 8 Jacob's Refund Request Denial Bill _ C 9 Engineering Services _ _ Bob J X 10 Tigard Street (Mull) Street Vacation Loreen C PH 11. Walnut Place/99W Street Vacation Loreen C __ PH 12 74th (near Cherry) Street Vacation Loreen C _— PH -- 13. 122nd (near Greenway) Street Vacation Loreen C PH lA: 67th & Clinton Street Vacation Loreen C PH -- 15. TRFPD Visit - Chief Pittard X 16 City Questionnaires - Bob J X X X 17 Sidewalk Policy Ordinance _ At— X X Bill C C C Monthly 16. Capital Proiect/LID Report -- 19. Davis CPA Bill PH 20 CPA Villa Ridge Ravine/Red Rock Crk (Bali) Bill PH DUE TO WP/SS FOR TYPING 8/9 8/16 8/30 9/6 9/13 9/20 10/4 10/11 10/18 DUE TO LOREEN AT NOON READY FOR PACKETS 8/14 8/21 9/4 9/11 9/18 9125 lo/9 10116 10/23 2426A Updated 8/12/85 Page 3 TENTATIVE AGENDAS - CITY COUNCIL SM RM RM SM SS RM SS RM SS RM _ ITEM WHO? 8/19 8126 9/9 9/11 9/16 9/23 9/30 10/14 10121 10/28 LATER NOTES i' Larry Scoville Temp Use - 1 vr. Bill PH - 2 Scholls West ZCA 10-85 (Times) Bill __ PH 3 Krueger Annexation # 2 Bill PH — 4. Schenk-Perrin Annexation Bill PH 5 Irvington Moore TU 6-85 Bill ?H_ Crim. - 6. TMC Revisions/Codifications Atty X X X C __ Nov. Election 7 Elections Procedures/Charter Update At_ tY- —— - 8 Expenses Policy Review _— Bob J C X 9 LID Policy_.& Ordinance JO`L_ X 10 Computer Master Plan RFP Joy_ X _ 11 Fees 6 Charges Update Resolution Jam_ X C _w C X Budget Comm NOV 12 Revenue Manual (Fees S SOC) Joy 13 68th/Parkway LID X135 _ Bill X? X? 14 Greenburg/Tiedeman LID H85-02 Bill X? Awar 11/11id Bd 15 Phone Report 6 Bid Authorization Loreen X X 16 SOC Rebate Repeal _ Bob J X 17. Utilities 6 Solid Waste Committees Bob J __ C to.'Community Development Code Revisions Bill_ __ FH PH - 19. Codes Enforcement Code Revisions Bill X 20 Beaverton/Tigard Councils _ Bob J XX DUE TO WP/SS FOR TYPING 8/9 8/16 8/30 9/6 9/13 9/20 10/4 10/11 10/18 DUE TO LOREEN AT NOON READY FOR PACKETS 8/14 8121 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 10/9 10/16 1012.3' 2426A t Updated 8/12/85 - Paye 4 TENTATIVEAGENDAS — CITY COUNCIL SM RM RM SM SS RM SS RM SS RM ITEM WH07 8/19 8/26 9/9 9/11 9/16 9/23 9/30 10/14 10/21 10/28 TATER NOTES 1: Salary 6 Classification Study Report Doris X X 2. 911 Revenue Report 6 Recommendation _ Chief x X 3.' Board 6 Dept. Workshops Bob J ED PARK X 4. Service Level Priorities Bob J X XX 5. Policy 6 Admin. Resolution Bob J X C 6. Council Community Relations Workshop Bob J X 10/12 Weekend 7. Boardmanship Handbook Loreen C 8. Benefits Discussion (Lyster) Bob J __ X? 9. Annual Audit Report Jerri _X 10. Half Street Improvement Policy Disc. Bill X — 11. County/Tigard UPAA - Bill X 12. Urban Services Policy Plan Joy X 13. Annual Performance Report Bob J X January 14, CIP Finance Review (SDC) Bob J X Spring 15. Streets CIP Workshop Bill X Spring 16. 72nd LID Reassess — PH 6 Ordinance Bill X 17. Dartmouth LID Update Atty X 18. Bellwood III Sidewalk Extension/1 Year Bill C 19. SDC Policy Review Bob J X Spring 20. -- DUE TO WP/SS FOR TYPING 8/9 8/16 8/30 9/6 9/13 9/20 10/4 10/11 10/18 DUE TO LOREEN AT NOON READY FOR PACKETS 8/14 8/21 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/2.5 10/9 10/16 10/23 2426A REVENUES FY 84-85FY 84-85 CHANGE FY 85-86 FY 85-86 CHANGE CD BY'FUND CONTROL ACTUAL FY 84-85 ADOPTED ADJUSTED FY 85-86 (3/85) (7/85) „ (+ $500) (6/85) (8/85) AXES 727383 745352 18000 764370 764370 -O- OTHER AGENCIES 515827 522166 6500 346700 516700 170000 FEES$ CHARGES 457500 555063 97500 399400 399400 -0- FINES S FORF. 125500 134M 8500 119500 119500 -0- FRANCHISE REV, 582900 591245 8500 611000 626000 15000 MONEY'£ PROP. 70000 81793 11500 44200 44200 -0 OTHER REVENUES; 45000 51363 6500 18000 36000 18000 SUBTOTAL 2524110 2681022 157000 2303170 2506170 2030GD BEGINNING BALANCE 356583 356583 -0- 57000 727000* 157000* GENERAL FUND 2880693 3037605 157000* 2873170 3233170 360000 FED.REV.'S?TARE 133946 WC -0- 52000 ? -0- SWER FUND 588270 WC -0- 650000 we -0- 'STORM DRAINAGE 292743 we -0 315000 we -0- ST ATE 0- STATE GAS TAX 423979 NIC -0- 454000 we -O- CO. GAS TAX 124103 WC --0- 370750 we -0- CO. ROAD LEVY 234459 we -0- 7000 WC -0- STREETS SDC 360363 we -0- 550000 ? -0- PARKS SDC 116594 NIC -0- 151500 ? -0- BOND DEBT 136831 we -0- 398000 N/C -0-- , SPEC. ASSESSMENT 1807A77 WC -0- 4746363 WC -0- BUILDING FUND 2319831 MIC -0- 1700000 ? -o- ALL OTHER FUNDS 6540996, N/C -0- 9394613 9394613 -0- '' TOTAL REVENUES 9421689 NIC -0- 12267783 12627783 360000 Iw/0'942p Eby -3 EXPENDITURES FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 85-86 CHANGE BY PROGRAM CONTROL ADOPTED ADJUSTED FY 85-86 NOTES LICE 1250500 1363032 1363032 N/C Sgts. w/in $...Rtmt.$ Contingency (29) (31) (30.5) (.5) FINANCE F, 361000 382850 382850 NIC SERVICES (11.5) (12) (12) MUNICIPAL COURT 65000 78173 78173 N/C (1) (1.5) (1.5) LIBRARY 277824 253000 440360 187360 WCCLS $...$15,000 GF Cut.. 3/4 Libn (6) (6) (7.75) 1.75 1 pt G tpt... SOCIAL SERVICES -0- -0- -0- ? Contingency...FRS? COMMUNITY SER. 1954324 2077055 2264415 187360 (FTE) (47.5) (50.5) (51.75) +1.25 CO-ADMIN. 148700 161610 161610 N/C Sal. Savings 4 AP C Consultant (4) (4) (3.75) (.25) City Engr. G Rec. Consultant DS-BUILDING 116000 124188 124188 N/C (3.75) (4) (4) DS-PLANNING 73662 116197 1161.97 N/C DS Manager? Spring 186? (2.5) (4) (4) Dir-ENGINEERING 149000 170195 200195 30000 ET I/Draftaawn G Related Costs. (3.5) (4) (5.5) +1 fee Supported STREET LT. 159000 # -0- N/C PW-OPERATIONS -0 1306(5, 13069( 4) N/C_ _. 4-WASTEWATER 274311 204788 204788 N/C (5.75) (5) (5) PW-STREETS 178000 398264 398264 N/C (4.75) (6) (6) PW-STREET LT. -0- 170000** 170000 N/C PW-PARKS 85800 55000 90000 35000 Parks Crew Chief...General Fund (1.75) (1.5) (1.5) +.75 PW-SHOPS/SERV, 109000 -0-* --0- N/C (3.25) COMMUNITY DEV, 1293473 1360937 1425937 65000 (FTE) (29.25) (32.5) (33.25) +1.5 POLICY/ADMIN. 162500 155500 162100 6600 Personnel G Merit System (FTE) (3) (3) (3) N/C Consultant Fees CITY-WIDE SUPPORT 447000 415000 469000 54000 Rents, Consultants, Furnishings DEBT SERVICE 2044380 944363 944363 N/C CAPITAL PROJECTS 3099287 ' 6866200 6866200 N/C CONTINGENCY 245488 448728 495768 47040 General Fund Contingency ALL OTHER 5998655 8829791 8937431 71640 - TOTAL EXPENSES 9421689 12267783 12627783 360000 (FTE)' (79.75) (86) (90) +4 -1w/0942p MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO, Bob Jean, City Administrator August s, 1985 FROM: Jerri L'Widner, Finance Director ' SUBJECT: RESULTS OF MEETING WITH EQUITABLE ASSURANCE AGENT ON RETIREMENT Per Councilor Brian's request, I met with Kay Ostrom from Equitable Assurance regarding the police retirement plan. Mr. Ostrom informed me on Friday, August 2, 1985 that his firm would not be able to 'save the City any money this year on the pension plan. He felt that within three to five years with his firm he could save the City some money, but he could not guarantee it, I told him that I couldn't recommend .to Council a change when there would be no savings in the first year. Mr. Ostrom's firm rarely writes defined benefit plans, so would require the City to take on more administrative duties with the pension. E It is also important to note that any change to another private carrier would �» require an actuarial study to determine if the plan met the "equal to or better than PERS" test. This would be an additional cost to the City. Please let me know what the next step should be. _(1014F) G 3 Smith/dull o Qditnet!�- 0 dlchltectS August 13, 1985 Mr. Bob Jean, Administrator City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Reference: Window Wall between Library and Quiet Room Tigard Civic Center Contract Revision #8 Dear Mr. Jean: Per our earlier conversations, there has been a request by the Librarian to add a glass wall and door between the Quiet Roomandthe main part of the Library. Thiswillrequire additional design and drawing time on our parts. As discussed _ these additional services will be billed at a lump sum of $500.00. We will then submit the drawings to the contractor for their estimate of the extra cost. Please attach this letter as part of "City of Tigard - Smith/Dull Partnership Contract for Architectural Services" under Article 15 Exhibit A and return a signed copy of this letter for our file. Approved: City of Tigard Respectfully,' Smith/Dull Partnership, Architects Norman R. Dull, Partner NRD/sh cc: file 6065 20915 S.W.105th AVENUE,TUALATIN,OREGON 97062 503/692 DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY ;ITY OF TIGARO,'OREGON PROGRAM: COMMUNITY SERVICES _ BUDGET UNIT: LIBRARY SERVICES 1985-86 ANNUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT CODE: 1.4 operation of the rary The City Librarian is responsible to the City Administrator for formationlfor continued education,sfor brecreation _ibrary is the community's shared resource for free access to in eading and for enrichment of the quality of reference;a ch children � library,in Tig large. The major opr print out each;b1Buy1AscluBooinclude:and :ollection, circulation, and development, 5 i special programs. ev gztY•A-�WK ��S 11J7 I ha]or 1985-86 goals are: � ' Seek more equitable governance structure 6 17564;5 �,�S3 o Move and transition into new facility o stable funding for WCCLS ✓ � �� o Focus- on basic services to library users �� o Expand volunteer training and program o implement microcomputer tasks and coordinate with WCCLS Automation o Develop a better access to book collection PONA�.wnS PROPOSED RECANy1EN0E0 ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED EXPENDITURE PROPO86 1985-86 1985-86 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 SUMMARY 174,400 145,338 145,338 114,323 136,860 133,824 1244480 PERSONAL SERVICES: (7.75) (6) (6) (-7,75) (5 75) (6) (6) 13,000 9,002 9,002 7,987 8,782 9,500 8,815 MATERIALS SERVICES: 27,125 30,338 145,500 109,705 CAPITAL OUTLAY 116,I00 98,660 98,660 ��`jo�9 : II (II) (II} (I) Service Levels (III) TOTAL - LIBRARY 149,435 175,980 288,824 243,000 303,500 253,000 253,000 ��3�0 93,10 REVENUES 17 83,500 .183,000 183,000 1671360 67,302 96,180 -it'2'�93E 3,000 General fund, State Grants 1,000 1,000 1,000 1 0a1 2,000 1,600 6,000 1000 a 500 500 500 '600 500 Fines (41vv07pvlsAAB 2,500 3,000 Donations 3,000 3,000 3,000 0;/�J C 0 831 200 500 500 500 5-00 -0- -0- �� 4,860 500 Service Charges 65,000 WCCLS �qj(S'-bc�$). 215.000 65,000 65,000 SSS o 0 79.302 78,000 I�r' -t�9; 6 uirGl.S�8'I�5, , -0- -0- -0 � 00 0 -0- -o- -a- -o- `�y°J 360 _ 303,500 ?53,000 253,000 ?88,824 243,000 TOTAL 149,435 175,980 WORK MEASURES (LEVEL) 1:21 ,368 1 71,667 1 18,000 1:26,666 Employees torPublicon 1.16,750 1 .20,0400 1:20,0400 1; 1130 1/o q8 40 40 22 Hours Open _130,000 120,000 120,000 1;T' o an 112,867 130,000 126,000 110,000 Circulation ,-� 28,750 Size of Collection 29,900 28,750 28,750 3�, •• 26,000 27,300 28,665 3,000 2,800 2,800 315�P 1 ,961 2,25 2,500 2,800 Volunteer Hours - 60 PROGRAM: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY CITY Of TIGARD, OREGON BUDGET,UNIT: LIBRARY SERVICES 1985-86 ANNUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT CODE: 10-14000 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED EXPENDITURE PROPOSED RECOMMENDED ADOPTED 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 DETAIL 1985-86 1985-86 1985-86 (5.75) (5.75) (6) (4.5) PERSONAL SERVICES: (7.75) (6) (6) 501 Salaries-ftnagement 26,140 28,072 30,108 31,614 Librarian 31,614 31,614 31,614 - 33,912 41,659 20,760 21,798 A3st. librarian 21,798 21,798 21,7-98 11,300 34,455 -0- -0- Assoc. Librarian (.75) 13,950 -0- 502 Salaries-General 37,833 16,608 17,400 Library Asst. III 17,400 17,400 17,400 24,732 15,156 Library Asst. III 15,156 15,156 15,156 - - -0- Library As3t. II 12,726 12,726 12,726 - 8,000 8,000 0 000 583 9,096 8,000 504 Regular Part-time (:5) 8.000 10 000 505 Temporary Part-time (1.5) 12,480 3,450 3,450 12,1650 1.000 4,800 500 Merit Pool 5.900 4,800 4,800 --- 60 520 Overtime 94,567 108,147 102,304 98,766 SUBTOTAL 139,024 114,944 114,944 1NQi'�N�l Benefits 1} +K $ 000 02 614 439 1,967 1,017 550 Unemployment 1, 24 1,183 1, 02 477 757 812 427 551 Workman's Compensation 591 502 551 6,504 8,712 7,657 6,800 552 Social Security (FICA) 8,329 7,704 7,704 560 Retirement 9,385 8,039 8,039 4:313 9,480 7,299 7.020 3o13R'l 127 488 428 378 565 Life Insurance 567 473 `473 790 847 1,602 913 566 Salary Continuation 1,246 1,048 1,048 6,931 7,990 11,755 9,156 567/568 Medical/Dental 13,734 11,445 11,445 114,323 136,860 133,824 124,480 TOTAL - PERSONAL SERVICES 174,400 145,338 145,338 /7$ $3F NOTES: Level II - Retain present starf at 6 FTE. ..Level III Retain present staff; hire .75 Assoc. Libn, 1.5 part-time. 3 7n 9E• OY Ar-NANCZE 11 - 61 - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PROGRAM: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY 1985-86 ANNUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT CODE: 10-14000 BUDGET UNIT: LIBRARY SERVICES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED REQUESTED EXPENDITURE PROPOSED RECOMMENDED ADOPTED 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 DETAIL 1985-86 1985-86 1985-86 MATERIALS & SERVICES: 1,201 2,136 1,200 11200 602 Contractual Services 21000 11200 1,200 150 610 Rep & Main - Fac. 150 150_ 150------- 994 50--- ---- 994 545 500 600 612 Rep & Main-Office Equip. 600 600 600 2,802 3,584 4,392 4,600 620 Office Supplies & Expe. 61000 4,600 4,600 61600 223 147 368 375 621 Advertising & Publicity 500 375 375 8�S 2,107 1,886 200 200 623 Dues & Subscriptions 200 200 200 5po 430 351 340 400 624 Travel, Food & Lodging 600 400 40000 230 133 500 500 625 Education & Training 750 327 327 9AI 2,000 790 630 Rents & Leases 2,800 1,150 11150 1�3 So 7,987 8,782 9,500 8,815 TOTAL - MATERIALS & SERV. 13,000 9,002 9,002 NOTES: #602 - bookbinding.. . #620 - @ 5% supplies increase, office equipment. . . # 621 bookmarks, 'typeline, etc. . . #623 - ALA @ $50, 01_A @ $25, PNLA @ $40, OEMA @ $20, Journals @ $65, *library magazine subscriptions for collection in #705. . . #625 P.C.C. classes and professional conferences #630 2 Gaylords @ $225, xerox @ $700 -(fee supported). . . [#630 - Level III - 2nd cy machine in new bldg.] -'62 ' x COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY CITY OF TIGARO, OREGON PROGRAM: BUDGET UNIT: LIBRARY SERVICES 1985-86 ANNUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT CODE: 10-14000 REQUESTED EXPENDITURE PROPOSED RECOMMENDED ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED DETAIL 1985-86 1985-86 1985-8b 19.82-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 CAPITAL OUTLAY: / 65,000 65,000 65,000 a0�(,860 110500 65,000 704 Office Furn. 6 Equip. 51,100 33,660 33,660 �3�66� 1,809 2,490 , 44.705 705 Library Books� )aTwS 25,316 27,848 35• 000 . boy No'(£S: , 100 Fu��CS 65,000 J1,0140 � � y TOTAL - CAPITAL OUTLAY 116,100 98,660 98 660 + o 27 125 27 848 145 500 109 705 NOTES: Ii705 - $27,410 books, $2,5 magazines, $250 newspapers, $2,000 microfiche (magazines), x1,000-tapes/records, NOTES: software (public use). . .#704 - WCCLS funds for furnishings in new bldg. . . � - 63 - • ,n,00 l a@ /WV i goo <f Add: �4¢ a, C 7e)-y,. Do /y 5,33� P d c� .C .� 'Poe ��S 8,3 2 (7 7 5 f`fF� .305 Soo C 4 +(/,742- 331 SD �4k% .300 Trrquc/ Soo ppb Soo .� # G o 0 Added: k 41y ;Ahl, Az OmAlVin ei Phancl j�tm Ca��,,,. -Z5'oa YG 9 P mcdens- yAo iG,P )0 OROno 360 �o o � t nININ p _t cj Q t O o O n R! IAV 114- 0 0 a o a �o o a A } vi o a O o� vi o V) Q `� � I i �• � Expend,'-�u�res � s.ia,as 1'erso'n,9/ Seryllces : J assoc, 1A6,, 6. 7:5) /he Cl moo 70 .1 _ �Ir6z, 5 so o v y4r 30, 39Y ADD 38 39 4rl Ar Sr s �Q � y� o© t� 3, 0D2 ��eri a.l `.�erv�'ces , r s AO ..tz°ve►� 7 5 s'o 40 7.S' Tott.L 705 1 oov F 16'o o QZass door- o aj boa Sig/t�oj.e.' / Sod 13 vo�t +#-U xs � / herrn nom ) 3 d V l�r5orr� �'�ernr eisa- yirl�Gi ,Z�SO O y,2 .-A7 c aye /Y 1-i b►-/�r Y ,lS o o ks ,�� ' �-� -�~ ��,,2 d c� r.� 6�l� #r(, 'br y 0-r 3Lc�n i s i n�5 w�ctis Ca,-R y,-ova►- G5 ®OD 10 41110 �' x El s ,< ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT August S. 1985 4_ Prepared by Randy Clarno _, Engineering Servic s Man er TABLE OF CONTENTS N0. ITEM PAGES 1. PURPOSE _, . . . . 2 - 2. CURRENT AND PAST FUNCTIONS OF THE ENGINEERING SECTION. 2-5 3. PRIOR YEARS FUNCTION AND F.T.E. ACTIVITY . . . . . 5 4. F.T.E. SERVICE COST AND REVENUE DETERMINATION FOR FY 85-86 . . . . 6.7 5. F.T.E. PROBLEMS DUE TO FLUCTUATION IN PRIVATE AND CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT . 7 6. SOLUTIONS FOR LONG TERM (3-5 YRS.) STABILITY . . . . 7.8 7. SUPPLEMENT "A.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 F.T.E. and Service Cost Computations I. Private Development Services . . . . . . . . . A-1 thru A-8 II. Geographic Information Services . . . . . . . A-8 thru A-11 III. Capital_Development Services . . A-11 thru A-13 1 IV. General Admin. and Misc. . . . A-13, A-14 i S 1 y _ l z ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT„ y, 1., PURPOSE ( The purpose of this Report is to: A. Clearly define the current functions of the Engineering Sevices Section, including support to the City Engineer; a. Determine F.T.E. requirements, service cost and revenue sources, given these currentfunctions, for the FY 85-86 workload and attempt to make projects for future years; C. Describe the negative impacts that fluctuations in Private and Capital Development activity; have on F.T.E. Requirements; and 0. Propose solutions to these fluctuation problems that promote long term (3-5 yrs.) stability: 2. CURRENT FUNCTIONS The Engineering Section provides services that fall into 3 major categories, namely 1) Private Development, 2) Geographic Information, and 3) Capital Development. The following is an outline describing the specific functions within these major categories. '# S Y 3 } r PAGE 2 ENGINEERING 8ERVICES-REPORT -w r, - � s�}'sC?.'��+14..K•4. rP_.kkt at ~ CURRENT FUNCTIONS OF THE ENGINEERING SECTION PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Land-Use Applications a) Review, condition and assist in processing of the fallowing Land Use applications. 1) Comp. , Plan Amend. 5) Site Design Review 2) Planned Developments 6) Minor and Major Partitions 3) Conditional Use 7) Subdivisions 4) Variances 8) Sensitive Lands 4) Zone Changes 2. Improvement Permits a) Complete processing of the following types of public improvement permits.- 1) Subdivisions (Street, sewer, 4) Sewer (san. and stm.) and private utilities) 5) Street-openings/Private Utilities 2) half--streets 6) Delg. projects 3) Full-streets 3 Public/Agency Assistance a) Other Agency correspondence (Non-project related). -b) Engineering Standards c) Pre-land Use Application conferences d) General citizen assistance e) Inter-departmental assistance 4. Property Vacations a) The City Engineer with the assistance of engineering personnel is required - to prepare a report on the following types of vacation applications. 1) Streets 2) Easements 3) Plats b) Personnel working in Private Development prepare the bulk of this report because of the closely related activities between the two. B. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES 1. Mapping Information Records The Section provides mapping information services primarily to the general public and the Community Development Dept. as a whole. However, all other possible exception of the library,departments, with the p p Y, are also dependent on mapping services. PAGE 3 ?_ENGINEERING'SERVICES'REPORT a) General Department Mapping t 1) Parcel Maps 9) Survey Control 2) Zoning 10) Topography 3) Land-Use 11) Flood Plain 4) Address 12) Const. Plans & Standards 5) Annexations 13) Road Jurisdiction 6) Storm Drainage 14) Other Source Map Maint. 7) Sanitary Sewer 15) Transportation/Traffic Counts 8) Streets 16) Park and Greenway 17) Special District Boundaries b) Non-Department Mapping 1) Road Jurisdiction 2) Annexations 3) Address 4) City Limits 5) Crime Scene drawings c) The Section provides compiled information from the above sources to Administration and other Gov't. Agencies for the purpose of funding, planning and general information. 2. Survey and Design The Section provides surveying and Design to support a) Public Works Operations Maintenance projects. b) City-wide control and mapping activities and c) possibly City capital improvement program engineering. a) Public Works Operations maintenance projects 1) Annual Overlay Program 2) Right-of-way staking (Street & Greenway) 3) Traffic markings (Intersections) 4) Topography 5) Property line locations b) City--wide activities. 1) Field Control Network a. Horiz. and Vertical Control for private and public development (Development Code requirement) b. Topography and aerial mapping control C. Public right-of-way and property surveying (boundary locations) d. Monumentation perpetuation c) Capital Improvement Program Engineering (not performed in FY 84-85) 1) Engineers Report Primarily mapping information and some field investigation �? information. �. PAGE 4` ENGINEERING-SERVICES REPORT 2) Preliminary and Final Design K a) Topography and right-of-way location survey. b) Construction plans and specifications preparation c) Dedication and easement document preparation 3) Construction a) Contract documents preparation b) Improvement staking 4) Close-out a) Final location survey and monumentation b) Improvement as-built survey 3. , Street C.I.P. plan and inventory C. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The City Engineer is primarily responsible for this area. However, the Engineering Services Section provides support information to the City Engineer. 1. Public Facility Master Plans review/Private Development support. a) Transportation Plan (Traffic, standards and coordination) b) Sanitary Sewer Plan (standards and policy) c) Storm Drainage Plan (1981 CH2M Hill adopted plan) 2. - Capital Improvement Program a) Future program planning/Federal & State "Development Grant Applications" b) Assist with project coordination and Administration of Engineering Consultants, other agencies and City staff through project stages (Feasibility Report, Engineer Report, Preliminary Design, Final design, construction and project close-out) . 3. Local Improvement Districts a) Assist with project coordination and Administration of Engineering Consultants and other agencies through complete L.I.D. process. (Primary function of City Engineer) 3. PRIOR YEARS FUNCTION AND F.T.E. ACTIVITY In FY 83-84, the Engineering Section had to reduce its F.T.E. from 7 to 3.5 due to a significant slow down in Private Development and a reduced Capital budget. This slow down began to occur in FY 82-83. During the first part of FY 84-85 activity began to increase_ slightly and by mid year required that 0.5 F.T.E. be added for a total of 4. During the last half of FY 84-85 numerous Private Development projects were coming on-line as well as a significant increase in Capital Projects. During this period the -• functions of the Section were pretty much as described above including Capital Project Engineering: PAGE5 :a ENGINEERING'SERVICES REPORT 4. F.T.E. SERVICE COST AND REVENUEDETERMINATION FOR FY 85-86 C The following position titles (level of ability)were used for these computations: _City Engineer OA III Engineering Services Manager Assoc. Engr. (E.I.T.) Engr. Tech III Engr. Tech II (Inspection - Private Development) Engr. Tech II (Geographic survey - Info. and projects) Engr. Tech I Engr. Assist. OA II The City Engineer and Office Assist III are currently within the Community Development Dept, Administration and no change is recommended or anticipated. This report will only identify F.T.E. requirements for these two positions as they relate to engineering services and estimate non-related services. These computations will also include 2 positions that haven't existed within the Engineering ' Section for sometime. These are the Assoc. Engineer (E.I.T.)' and Assistant. The Tech I position, also included, existed prior to FY 84-85 before development activity slowdown forced the elimination of the position. All Engineering Services positions described above with the exception of the E.I.T. and Tech I will be used to identify FY 85-86 requirements. The purpose for this is C to achieve a balance between the Function/Task to be performed and the level of -- skills and abilities of the position required to perform the task. For example, having a Tech III performing task that an Assist, could handle is a last resort situation and not cost effective. The total F.T.E. per position shown later in "Exhibit 8", reflects a near perfect balance of task and position required. In establishing the F.T.E. requirements, all required manhours per position for specific function were computed given the projected FY 85-86 workload. The F.T.E. 's assume 1784 productive hours per year and 296 non-productive hours for a total of 2080 per year. These are the guidelines previously set forth in the last years' fees and charges update, Productive and non-productive service cost were computed separately assuming little or no city-wide support for non-productive cost. The following chart (Exhibit "A") was developed to determine the total hourly service cost per position. Here again the basic structure of the chart was derived from the fees and charges update and standard budgeting practice for the City. 'l_,. ' PAGE 6 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT • .r{�r� �jpl A/ .wi N N N N � .. •+ J s « M 40 J p;po r N d_ onIL s a 4-4 '04 pj M q M m K f M N N a w a a a a a a a a s i� p mm ,qy • jy�jOj o a w w e•e w n O 1p pp b M .r b N • A .r • tl w N �. w N 2 •' p p �p A t N f O w A - y� wf N rw M M M N N N F~'• e'er' A p p. A at P A A. A A P'! `• an 44 od .r C6 gp ... r a w t O.. N • M � O M wool w iNq W tN.1 i%. N �• I� inin (((��999 / "+ w pw� r � ��QQBpp a n• •s 1I/f�l��11 .r No w in C � - �j• � N N N v N •i � v v �Y O� v . w �• ii A r N • r ~ .wi N .: M f f A N N « W •wi .Mi . . In ;. •(1 fo r v v v v « IN « _ rd A M= y,,y i�r ..c c e t t. .r .e•<+( i✓fit"vM� I� ••{ The next chart, EXHIBIT "B" (on the next page), was developed to show the relationships between: Specific functions, F.T.E. requirements, service cost and funding for FY j5-86. The values were computed after evaluating each functions requirements separately. These computations are found in Supplement "A" to this Report. The last column to the right shows funding for all service cost and all existing or potential revenue sources 5. F.T.E. PROBLEMS DUE TO FLUCTUATION IN PRIVATE AND CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT The section was able to handle the workload with some restrictions with 4 F.T.E. (excluding the OA II) for most of FY 84-85. However the significant increase in Private and Capital Development has changed this situation as shown in Exhibit "e". This is not new to the Engineering_ Section. - Since 1980 the Section has experienced the following F.T.E. changes: Year F.T.E. 1980-81 4 1981-82 6 1982-83 6 1983-84 7 1984-85 3.5 to 4.0 1985-86 5.7 (Exhibit "B") Because the Section is so diversified with the functions it performs, these F.T.E. changes have created several, problems with assignments and cost effectiveness with the services it performs. As described earlier, when Private and Capital projects are 'down, a Tech III may be expected to perform Tech III, II and I work. 'his recent F.T.E. requirement change has happened for several reasons, primarily: 1. Significant increase in Private Development, most notably subdivisions, over the last 12 months. 2. Significant increase in Capital projects, primarily L.I.D. 's. However, the City's Capital project list has also grown by about 50%. Other recent factors have complicated the operations of the Section such as the departure of 3 engineering employees. 6 SOLUTIONS FOR LONG TERM (3-5 YRS) STABILITY During FY 84-85 all L.I.D. and Capital Projects had to be engineered by consultants. Engineering staff could not handle any of these projects, due to the pick up in Private " Dev. , as it had in the past (e.g. 100th & 68th sewer L.I.D.' s, street re-conditioning program). Using this same rassumption for FY 85-86 the City can expect to have about 7 F.T.E. 's in Consultants working on Capital Projects. Two basic solutions exist for these F.T.E, fluctuation problems. One is to replace some of the Consultant F.T.E. 's with City staff to a level that is stable so lay-offs will be limited if not eliminated. The other solution would be to significantly reduce the Section's functions to a stable F.T.E. level and consult the remainder. This latter solution is expensive, sometimes negatively affecting productivity and is not recommended The former solution, which has success in surrounding communities (e.g. Reaverton, Hillsboro, Forest Grove, Tualatin and Lake Oswego) is recommended. PAGE 7 ENGINEERING SERVICES' REPORT f = f r 3 � 1 MF *2 fix Ilk • a � w - r i w f w >r t. w �.• � � «� p w M w • .{ �° w a « : is $ t >E s 1 « : « « « >E « « z d S • • • • d 6 i e d d .: . d d i N ! Illelil 1 Ie e 1 t 111 1 1 E Y �� ! If1 � Ilrl : 3f ; s aE a 1 11f I6 r i d d d d i d d, • . e d ' i r d d s • d i � ' g r d d i • d • d d • i • w d • d d d . eta - lit w 8 I , t•i a ift � II It, t 1 � '� ' � � 1 � � L j lit �`' i, lS4 � [ d ® � wi i aid � d•s� A d m w � d Replacing L.I.D. consultants is high in risk as the activity fluctuates considerably. However, the City'sCapital Budget can be much more stable and supportive of F.T.E. needs over the long term. This year the City will need 2.0 Consultant F.T.E. 's for Capital Projects. Given the Council's commitment to Metzger and stabilizing the Capital Improvement Program budget, this F.T.E. need will definitely grow. Looking at Exhibit "B", the total F.T.E. requirement per position is unbalanced. This would. be balanced by replacing 1.0 Consultant F.T.E: and now utilizing the E.I.T. and Tech I positions. These changes are shown in Exhibit "C" on the next page. Each ° position is now balanced with two exceptions. One being the OA II which is currently" shared to make it full-time. The other being the E.I.T. , which is being proposed for only half of FY 85-86. Capital Projects in which staff would handle this year would be: 1. R/W'Acquisition 2. Hec II Storm Drain Update 3 Fanno Creek Channel Enhancements All funding for this additional F.T.E. being out of the Capital Budget. The proposed plan recommends that the Tech I and Assist be added before Jan. 1986 and the E.I.T. position in late winter. The above projects require primarily field work and less engineering by the E.I.T. The next Exhibit, "D" (on the page after Exhibit "C") shows 5-yr, projections for all major function F.T.E. requirements and how these proposed changes would balance the F.T.E. requirements and make significant improvements to the long term stability of the Section. EQUIPMENT AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS Space needs are not significantly impacted due to the phasing in of the positions. Sufficient space exists in the existing building for the Tech I and Assist. The new building will accommodate these two positions and the E.I.T. later this winter. Basic operating equipment already exist for the most part. In looking at a 5-yr. plan and given some of the Section's current needs, a commitment to capital equipment will be necessary. The capital needs this year are primarily computer hardware, namely a drafting plotter which will cost about $14,000. Engineering currently has very productive software and is budgeted to obtain more this year. The drafing plotter will increase mapping productivity by probably 2:1 this year and 3:1 in following years. The Computer Master Plan effort and eventual purchase this year is not adversely affected if the plotter is purchased separately. I highly recommend we purchase this year's budgeted equipment and the plotter before October. One other major capital purchase will ba necessary within this 5-year plan, probably in the later years. This is a new Survey Van. The existing van is over 15 years old and has maybe 2-3 years left in it. In conclusion I want to strongly recommend that this plan or a similar plan be v _ mplemented immediately. Continual ups and downs in F.T.E requirements will only reduce the Section's -efficiency and increase personnel turnover. A commitment to long-term stability is needed. 'PAGE 8 ENGINEERING SERVICES_REPORT .. w 3a $ « ! lis . i = 33� s` �Ji=g i riddiii w di o : .: : 9sd : i w Iw i : : : d : ® d d • : S i i d : : d i d i : i r I lr111iI S 21 « S � $ « t 111 !B �a $ d d * V t 1 « 1 « 44R I 1111 $ ti �_� '� i _ � ti _ -� a � .. .i v • wo �, `I .. F.T. �c EQU 112 AR T'S FT S 14 ' �aeasus-�'�.T. •s Iz �y la A. yy EAr. Du 00 p Ra pas1-- k.... FTE PTC CyEO[� ,Pa}lG. nn v1?RiVA't'E .'y�.ti•. W A 1 m ®O/6!�d .,. .�� ••mow• § p•,:;�� ;., ".tr s.tt�".�'°r"CiaT ji'� '7 c '"`� i �•'1� _g �*'�tr`r;lrT x`14[ , - r'a{r W d Y•• r Ns j e 4 ar r' l � L�� [ F a fM''k+��.�,[h a=r t-.• �'��sL �r�f y.. a .£ty �} 5i'� Y "��t.4 aS ' r �i.�� -x,.-:�E}� '�' t� rr£�-etc t �t-. .c _ . . ra..t�,y r T�.3�'•,.�. .` trR 2 � 5 L 7 ;LS• -Q`Fi "Q®'�`7� ®'tI. S� 4R 8447 SUPPLEMENT "A" ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT k } i J �x 1r A ENGINEERING `SERVICES.REPORT '':_ - SUPPLEMENT "A.. ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT FY 85-86 F.T.E. AND SERVICE COST COMPUTATIONS I. PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A. LAND USE APPLICATIONS TOTAL MANHOURS No, of FY 85-86 Tech Application Applications C.E. E.S.M. III Assist. 1 Camp. Plan Amend. 5 2.5 2.5 5 2. Planned Dev. - Com. 4 4 4 4 3. Planned Dew. Det. 4 4 4 4 4: Site Dow. Review 24 12 12 ` 24 - 5. Conditional Use 5 5 5 7.5 6. Variances 14 7 21 7; Minor Land Part. 10 - 5 15 15 8. `Minor Land Part. 2 1 3 3 9. Subdivision 8 8 , 8 8 8 10.Lot-line Adj . 5 - 2.5 5 5 11,Sen3itive Lands 6 9 6 9 6 TOTALS 87 44.5 54.5 103 42 < .. TOTAL SERVICE POSITION MANHOURS X RATE COST F.T.E. REQ. (Manhours = 1784) C.E. 44:5 31.80 1415 0.025 E.S.M. .54.5 28.93 1577 0.03 _ :Tech TII 103 27,32 2814 0.058 Assist. 42 15.14 636 0.024 Engr. Serv. Total - $502'l 0.112 .rs l s# _ ,FAGE' A-1 rENGTNEERING'`SERVICES REPORT?_ �i KNEW B. IMPROVEMENT PERMITS t .IMPROVEMENT PERMIT TYPE: SUBDIVISIONS - in progress From prior years, primarily FY 84-85 (not delinquent) REQ. MANHOURS PRIOR YEARS'GROSS FY 85-86 2 3 4 REVIEW FOR FY 85-86 LEVEL OF Review->Inspect->Ciose-out SERVICE NAME ATTENTION E.S.M. TECH TECH Assist. OA II III II 1. Carnahans Addition 4 - 2 13 18 - 2 $686 (25X) 13 Lot '(S1-85) 2. Winterlake II 3,4 2 10 180 35 3 6200 (50X) 63 Lots (53-85) 3. Shadow Hills II 3,4 2 8 90 20 4 3632 (50X) t 19 Lots (PD 8-85) 4. Gallos ,Vineyard 4 1 7 30 10 2 993 (25%) 15 Lots (S1-84) 5. Bond Park II 4 1 1 10 6 2 445 (10%) 24_Lots (S9-83) 6. Bond Park III 4 1 7 25 8 2 1066 (25X) 30 Lots (52-84) ( Chessman Downs 4 1 5 20 4 2 773 (10X) ' 49 Lots (S3-84) 8. Colony Creek II 4 1 7 20 4 2 902 (15X) 40 Lots (S11-83) ` 9, Colony Creek III 4 1 7 15 6 2 825 (25X) 16 Lots (511-83) 10. Colony Creek IV 4 1 3 15 4 2 452 (25X) 15 Lots (PD 6-84) 11. Winterlake I 4 1 2 10 3 1 500 (25X) 29 Lots (S6-82) I 12. Anton Park I 3,4 4 12 65 15 3 2435 (20X) 62 Lots (PD 5-85) 13. Gulfside Est. 4 1 2 8 3 1 396 (10X) 22 Lots (56-84) 14. Copper Creek IV 4 1 1 3 2 1 270 (5%) 30 Lots 15. McDonald Acres 4 1 4 6 2 1 400 (5X) 21. Lots (S9-79) It ... PAGE A-2 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT ,'6 •C16. Morning Hill IA 2 2. 4 1 i 224 (lox) T. 10 Lots 1 3 6 2 1 273 (10%) 17. Morning Hill III_ 4 TOTALS 24 83 520 143 32 $20.445 TOTAL SERVICE MANHOUF.T.E. Manhours 1784 RS X RATE COST POSITION 694 0.013 E.S.M. 24 28.93 0.046 Tech III 83 27..32 2268 52Q 25.89 13,463 4.294 Tech II 0.024 143 15.14 2.165 Assist. 13.28 425 0.018 OA II 32 - $19,015 0.390 TOTALS GROSS REVENUE= $20,445 SUBDIVISIONS (cont:) - ` Approved for development and scheduled for FY 85-85 review and construction. (Several now in review stage.)' FY 85-86 EST. TOTAL FY85-86 REV LEVEL OF FY 85-86 APPLIED -06 t` TOTO NAME ATTENTION E.S.M. TECH TECH Assist. OA II REVENUE 85 SERVICE III II 1 $1000 $ 750 (75%) 1. Arlies Plantation 2.3,4 3 6 14 Z 6 Lots (S2-85) 2. Springlake I 3 5400 2700 (50%) 2,3 8 22 AO 7 30 Lots (S5-85) 3. Springlake II 2 10 25 2 3 1 5220 1305 (25%) 29 Lots (S5-85) 4. Bonita Park 2,3 4 15 35 6 2 1800 1350 (75%) 10 Lots (S6-85) 5. Bonita Ind. Park 2,3 4 20 30 6 2 2700 1350 (50%) 14 Lots 6. Winterlake III 2.3,4 8 25 70 8 3 3780 3024 (80%) 21 Lots 08-85) 7. Sun Shadow I 2,3 10 35 85 10 3 6660 3996 (60%) 37 Lots (S9-85) 8 Sun Shadow II 2 10 85 310 5 2 8820 2205' (25%) 49 Lots (S9--85) 9. Penn Lawn Est. 2.3 4 15 20 4 3 2160 1080 (50%) 12 Lots ($10-85) PAGE A-3 -ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT 10. Summerlake II 2,3 4 15 20 4 2 2160 1080 (50%) 12.Lots (S11-85) 11. Summerlake III 2 4 20 10 4 24680 936 (20%) 26 Lots (S11-85) 12, Windsor Place 2,3.4 6 30 80 8 3 5760 4320 (75%) 32 Lots (S4-84) 13. Milmont 2,3 8 35 80 10 2 9180 4590 (50%) 51 Lots (S5-84) 14. Cecil Boone Park 2.3 4 18 35 4 2 3960 1980 (50%) 22 Lots (S6-84) 15. Shadow Park I 2.3 6 30 80 10 3 6560 3330 (50%) 37 Lots (S7-84) 16. Shadow Park II 2 6 30 - 2 1 5400 1350 (25%) 30 Lots (S7-84) 17. Sandlewood Park 2,3 4 15' 20 2 2 2340 1170 (50%) 13 Lots (S8-84) 18. "Anton Park II 2 4 35 20 4 3 8640 1728 (20%) 48 Lots (PD 5-85) 9. Mallard Lakes 2,3 6 40 70 8 4 6660 3330(50%) 37 Lots (PQ 4-85) 20. 3 New Subdivisions 2.3 26 80 120 50 20 13,500 6750 (50%) that total 75 Lots TOTALS 139 546 841 157 64 $106,480 $48,324 The last 2 years have shown that only 75% of these subdivisions will eventually get off the ground and be completed. NEW TOTALS AT 75% 105 409 630 118 48 $79,860 $36,243 Revenue Summary- TOTAL EST. FY 85-86 = 79,860 APPLIED EST. FY 85-86 = 36,243 CARRY OVER TO FY 86-87 = $43,617 PAGE A-4 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT _ TOTAL SERVICE POSITION MANHOURS X RATE COST F.T.E. (Manhours = 1784) 105 28.93 3038 0.059 Tech 111 409 27.32 11,174 0.229 Tech II 630 25.89 16,311 0.353 Assist. 118 15.14 1787 0.066 OA II 48 13.28 637' 0.023 TOTALS $32,947 0.73 APPLIED 85-86 REVENUE = $36,243 TOTAL F.T.E. FOR SUBDIVISION PERMITS Position Prior Year Proiects Current Year Projects TOTAL E.S.M. 0.013 0.059 0.072 Tech TTI 0`.046 0.229 0.275 Tech IT 0.290 0.353 0.643 Assist.. 0.024 0.066 0.09 OA II 0.018 0 023 0.041 TOTALS IMPROVEMENT PERMIT TYPE: Half-Streets Last year the Engineering Section processed 8 half-street improvement permits. This is about 35-40% of all "Site Development Reviews" and "Partitions" approved for development by the Planning Section. Each permit averaged about $600 .in revenue. FY 85-86 should have approximately the same results. f• • r. Total estimated number of S.D.R. 's S M.L.P. 's for FY 85-86 =-36 Total half-street permits at 35% = 12 { 12 permits at $600.00 each = $7200 (Total Gross Revenue) Required Manhours =Y ESM Tech III Tech II Assist. OA II ? r , Single Permit 1 5 15 2 1 12 permits = 12 60 180 24 12 p� PAGE A,-S s. NGINEERING.SERVICES REPORT,. • TOTAL. SERVICf: POSITION MANHOURS X RATE - COST _ F.T.E. (Manhours - 1784) { c.S.M. 12 28.93 347 0.007 Tech III 60 27,32 1639 0.034 Tech II 180 25.89 4660 0.100 Assist. 24 15.14 363 0,013 OA II 12 13.28 1590.007 TOTALS _ 7168 0.161 GROSS REVENUE = 7200 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT TYPE: Full Street Full street improvement permits are usually associated with "Site Development Reviews" and "Major Land Partitions". Last year the Section processed only 2 full—street improvement permits, namely the North Dakota Street and Durham Road extensions. The following F.T.E. and revenue analysis assumes the same volume for this year. Revenue 2 permits at $2300 Each = $4600 Gross Revenue 1 Manhours ESM Tech III Tech II Assist_._ OA II Manhours for single permit = 8 - 25 36 12 4 f permits 16 50 72 24 8 TOTAL SERVICE POSITION MANHOURS X RATE COST F.T.E. (Manhours _ 1784) E.S.M. 16 28.93 463 0.009 Tech III 50 27.32 1366 0.028 F Tech II 72 25.89 1864 0.040 Assist. 24 15.14 363 0.013 OA II 8 13.28 106 0.004 f TOTALS — — $4162 0.094 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT TYPE: Sewer Sewer, permits include both sanitary and storm drain projects. Primarily 90% of these are € sanitary sewer extensions associated with S.D.R. 's and M.L.P. 's. For the last 2 yrs, the Section has processed an average of 10 sewer permits per year at an average fee of $350 each. Revenue r r 10 permits at $350 each = $3500 Manhours ESM Tech III Tech II Assist. OA II Manhours for single permit 1 3 7 2 1 }' Manhours for 10 permits = 10 30 70 20 10 PAGE R-6 „;, . ;ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT TOTAL SERVICE POSITION MANHOURS X RATE COST F.T.E. (Manhours =1784) (71 E.S.M. 10 28.93 289 0.006 Tech III 30 27.32 820 0.017: Tech II 70 25.89 1812 0.039 Assist. 20 15.14 303 0.011 OA II In 13.28 133 0.006 TOTALS — 3357 0.079 GROSS REVENUE = $3500 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT TYPE, Street Openings Estimated number of permits for FY 85-86 = 15 @ an average of 40.00 each (revenue), REVENUE = $600 Manhours per permit- X TOTAL NO. OF PERMITS TOTAL MANHOURS Tech III = 1 15 = 15 Tech II = 1 15 15 TOTAL SERVICE POSITION MANHOURS X RATE COST F T.E. (Manhours 1784) i -ech III 15 27.32 410 0.008 Tech II 15 25.89 388 0.008 TOTALS - -- 798 0.016 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT TYPE: Dela. Projects Currently the City has 13 public improvement permits that are past due for completion. Unfortunately the Section can spend a considerable amount of time through the "Filing on the Bond" process to have the project completed, The project list is as follows: 1. Kneeland Estates Subd. 6. Scheckla Park Subd. 10, Picks Landing It Subd. 2. Morning Hill I Subd. -7. Exodus Subd. 11. O'Neel Acres Subd. 3. Genesis II Subd. 8. Merestone Subd. 12. Barbee Court Subd. 4, Genesis III Subd. 9. Colony Creek I Subd. 13. Bellwood III Subd. 5. Tonys Place Subd. AVG. HOURS NO. OF TOTAL TOTAL F.T.E. POSITION PER PROJECT PROJECTS HOURS X RATE SERV.COST (Hours = 17841 E.S.M. - 3 13 39 26.93 1128 0.022 Tech III 2 13 26 27.32 710 0.014 `' --fech II 2 13 26 25.89 673 0.014 TOTALS 7 - 2511 0.05 `PAGE A77 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT C. Public/Agency Assistance Chis years level of attention in this area is expected to be similar to that of last year. Actual figures from last year will be used for the computations. TOTAL, POSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours = 1784)- E.S.M. 178 28.93 5150 0.10 Tech. III 178 27.32 4865 0.10 Tech. II 89 25.89 2304 0.05 Tech. II 89 19.52 1737 0.05 OA II 178 13.28 2364 0.10 Engr. Serv. Total - - 16,418 0.40 D, Property Vacations There are currently 12 Street & Easement Vacations in the process. Several of these are in the close-out stage, however we are expecting several more this year to replace those. A total of 10 were used for the computations. TOTAL f_ OSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours _ 1784) C.E. 30 31.80 954 0.017 OA III 10 18.36 184 0.005 E.S.M. 20 28.93 579 0.01 Tech. III 20 27.32 546 0.01 Assist. 10 15.14 151 0.005 Engr. Serv. Total — -- 1276 0.025 F.T.E. AND SERVICE COST COMPUTATIONS II. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES A. MAPPING INFORMATION RECORDS 1 General Department Mapping PAGE A-8 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT e POSITION MANHOURS Map/Record Type E.S.M. TECH III TECH II ASSIST._ 1. Parcel Maps 10 50 200 2. Address Maps - -- 48 3. Special Dista Maps - 4 40 4. Zoning - 48 5. - Land Use - - 48 6. Annexations 4 4 48 7. Transportation/Traffic 4 - 4 48 8, Park & Greenway 2 10 40 9 Storm Drainage 4 4 30 300 10. Sanitary Sewer 4 4 30 300 11. Streets 2 20 80 12. Topography 4 - 10 50 13 Flood Plain 4 - 20 50 14. Survey Control 10 - 40 104 15. RoadJurisdiction 10 - 25 60 16. Eng. Const. Plans 6 Standards 10 10 25 85 17. Misc. Map 6 Road Maint. 5 15 15 75 Sub-Total 71 50 293 1640 2. Non-Department Mapping POSITION MANHOURS Map/Record Type E.S.M. TECH III TECH II ASSIST. 1. Road Jurisdiction See Above - 2. Address See Above 3. City Limits 1 - - 48 4. Crime Scene drawings 1 - - 40 Sub-Total 2 TOTAL POSITION- MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours = 1784) E.S.M. 73 28.93 2112 0.041 Tech III 50 27.32 1366 0.028 Tech II 293 19.52 5719 0.164 Assist. 1640 15.14 24,830 0.919 TOTALS -- - 34,027 1.152 6. SURVEY AND DESIGN 1. Public Works Operations Maintenance Projects ' .` PAGE A-9 ENGINEERING- SERVICES REPORT POSITION MANHOURS SURVEY to /Record T e E.S.M. TECH III TECH II ASSIST. 1. Road Right--of--Way 5 3 40 40 Staking 35 2, Annual Overlay 10 15 35 Program30 3. Traffic Control 1 4 30 Markings 4. Topography (profiles, 3 5 40 40 as-»builts. Parks, etc.) 30 30 5. Property-line 3 - Locations Sub-Total 22 27 175 175 TOTAL POSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours i 17841 E.S.M. 22 28.93 636 0.012 Tach 122 27 27.32 738 0.015 Tech II 175 19.52 3416 0.098 Assist. 175 15,14 2650 0.098 TOTALS - - -- 7440 0.22 ' 2. City-Wide Control POSITION_MANHOURS SURVEY Map/Record Tvpe E.S.M._ TECH II ASSIST. OA II 1. Horizontal Geometric 40 240 240 24 Control 2. Vertical Control 10 240 240 24 (Bench marks) 3. Topography and Covered under items 1 & 2 48 Aerial Mapping Control 4. public right-of-way30 80 80 2 boundary establishment _ 5. Monumentation 10 50 80 perpetuation (maintenance) Sub-Totals 90 610 640 116 �c PAGE A-10 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT TOTAL OSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours - 17841 E.S.M. 90 - 28.93 2604 0.050 Tech IT 610 19.52 11,907 0.341 Assist. 640 15.14 9690 0.359 OA II 116 13.28 1540 0.065 TOTALS - - $25,741 0.815 B. PUBLIC/AGENCY ASSISTANCE The Section expects to spend about 200 hours (comparable to last year) giving out Geographic related Information. Those hours breakdown per position as follows: TOTAL POSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours = 1780 E.S.M. 25 28.93 723 0.014 Tech III 35 27.32 956 0.020 Tech_Il 60' 19.52 1171 0.034 Assist. 40 15.14 606 0.022 A II 40 13.28 531 0.022 TOTALS 200 — 3987 0.112 F.T.E. AND SERVICE COST COMPUTATIONS III. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Public Facility Master Plan Reviews and Updates, The Section supports the City Engineer with Pubic Facility master planning and updates. Currently, the City has several plans in effect that need continuous attention. These include but are not limited to: 1) CH2M Hill adopted Storm Drainage Plan. 2) Sanitary Sewer master Plan and Policy, and 3) Transportation Plan (Traffic, standards and coordination). 3 PAGE A-11 ENGINEERING'SERVICES` REPORT TOTAL POSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST_ F.T.E. (Hours - 1784) C.E. 50 31.80 1590 0.028 OA II 10 18.36 184 0.005 _E.S.M. 35 28.93 1013 0.020 Tech Ili 50 27.32 1366 0.028 Engineering Services - 2379 0.048 Total Only 2. C.I.P. Administration The City will have about 9 Capital Projects or Progams that will require engineering services and administration, primarily by the City Engineer. However, Engineering Services provides support information to the City Engineer and Consultants, as well as updating records when the projects are completed. Current practive is to have Consultants handle the details of the Projects. The nine projects are: Wastewater Streets 1) Triangle Trunk P.E. 5) Hall & Durham Signal 2) 99W Replace P.E. 6) Hall & McDonald Signal 3) Hec II Major Storm 7) Right-of-way acquisition Drain System Study (2 or 3 projects) 4) Fanno Creek Grading and overflow channel projects F.T.E. Requirements and Service Cost TOTAL POSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours _ 1784) C.E. 535 (30%) 31.80 17013 0.30 OA III 25 18.36 459 0.014 E.S.M. 80 28.93 2314 0.044 Tech III 5 27.32 137 0.002 Assist. 25 15.14 378 0.014 Engr. Services Totals Only - - 2829 0.060 { a. L.I.O. Administration This year the City will probably have 12 or more L.I.D. projects. The same services are provided as stated above under C.Y.P. Administration. .. PAGE A-121 ENGINEERING SERVICESREPORT 9 TOTAL OSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours = 1784) C.E. 802 (45X) 31.80 25.504 0.45 OA III 120 18.36 2203 0.067 E.S.M. 120 28.93 3472 0,067 Tech III 85 27.32 2322 0.048 Assist. 100 35.14 1514 0.056 Engr, Services Totals - — 7308 0.171 4. Street C.I.P./Inventory TOTAL POSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours 1784) C.E. 178 31.80 5660 0.10 L S.M. 9 28.93 260 0.005 tech-III 268 27.32 7322 0.15 Tech II 50 25.89 1295 0.028 A II 90 13.28 1195 0.05 Engr. Service Totals 10,072 0.239 IV. GENERAL ADMIN. AND MISC, 1) Personnel Reviews 2) Training 3) Staff meetings (e.g. Safety, Computor User Group, Records, etc. ,) 4) Staff Committee support (e.g. Planning Commission, Transportation Comm. , NPO S, etc. 5) Civic Center 6) Policy meetings 7) Section management 8) Budget Preparation 9) Inventory 10) All managers meetings 11) Union meetings 12) Computer Master Plan '' PAGE A-13 ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT f 4 TOTAL OSITION MANHOURS X RATE SERVICE COST F.T.E. (Hours _ 1784) C.E. 357 31.80 11,353 0.20 OA III 196 18.36 3598 0.11 E.S.M. 874 28.93 25,285 0.490 Tech III 178 27.32 4863 0.10 Tech II (insp) 178 25.89 4608 0.10 Tech II (survey) 143 19.52 2791 0.08 Assist. 90 15.14 1363 0.05 OA II 90 13.28 1195 0.05 Engineering Services Totals - 40,105 0.87 (RC:pm/0221S) :r PAGE°A-14 ENGINIEERING SERVICES REPORT J MEMORANDUM CITY OF TLGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor and Council August 19, 1485 FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: Parks Maintenance Last month I met with Councilor Phil Edin, the Council's Finance and Audit Representative. and reviewed the current Budget situation► and some 'areas of concern. Among other topics, Parks maintenance was discussed. Based on that meeting, I then asked the Parks and RecreationBoard to review Park Maintenance Priorities and to evaluate our Core Level Maintenance Standard. The 'Board was also also asked; to consider the impact with Summer Lake Park and Downtown Fanno Creek Park coming into the City parks system. ' At its July 18, 1985 meeting the Parks and Recreation Board reviewed parks maintenance programs and recommended that an additional position be authorized if possible sometime this Fall to keep at the Core Level standard. Council reviewed the ®raft Policy Calendar and the suggested Budget adjustments at its :July 29, 1985 Workshop. One of the items discussed was the addition of a Parks Crew Chief. On July 30, 1985, Public Works Operations Superintendent Jerry McNurlin, Councilor Phil Edin and Parks Board Member Steve Schreiner met with several neighbors in the Woodard Park area about their concerns. Current maintenance levels within Budget cut-backs were discussed. A Work Schedule charge was arranged to mow Woodard Park now and the neighbors agreed to organize a Volunteer effort to help with Park maintenance efforts, Councilor Edin explained the need for a Parks Advocate in the Budget process. He explained that he would do what he could to see that Park maintenance was fairly considered among all City Budget priorities. RECOMMENDATION; Councilor Edin and I support the Parks and Recreation Board recommendation that a Parks Crew Chief be added as a part of this Budget adjustment. (BJ:bsi0949p) r: T H. La to Ir 1+ T T C1 E � C4 C CL L -T. M N E EErE ^ u 0 Ql 4j 4j E E -H CN � � 3 M En v G o 3 G G 3 E; E E u E E ++ G . -•i 7U—) � U) Lrl Ln %n Ln aG N - N N N H a 0 tea'-a a w c� x w H z H d b4 of i• G y• ul .n +,l ul LM sn Ow C �4 cc C +O O C Rf 81 JA T. M V N ow CAdi y Oi C ►+ U yr U ..� rp L• o CL a. a 0 0 id V as o m a s r4 Y L G V G _ 3 O bo HH V to Lu rUr k.7 :9 (4 - [aI I , �/Stuucusesforedreation needs By DEEDEE HARRINGTON city government should step In and assume responsibili cwmpa dwK Tm Or.yonan ty for the community's recreation needs. TIGARD-What kind of park and recreation services do If enhanced local recreation programming is needed, Tigard residents want? Who should provide those serv- options abound for providing it to the community at a ices?And how should those services be funded? manageable cost,Mahler said. City officials hope to obtain answers to those and other "Recreation does not need to be a costly item,'he said. questions through a study under way to gauge community "It just needs to be efficient." sentiment on park and leisure services. Possible avenues to a cost-effective recreation program Overseeing the$5,000 project is John Mahler,a veteran might include providing transportation from Tigard to an recreation program manager in both the private and public out-of-town facility and encouraging out-of-community sectors,who is working on contract for the city Park Board, groups to develop recreation programs for TIgard red. Mahler, 47, is the athletic director at Lutheran High dents. The survey also might Indicate local organizations' School in Portland and also coaches the school's baseball and needs for increased city support services such as schedul- basketball teams. Ing or typing. His experience includes two years as superintendent of Mahler would not directly respond to questions regarding the city of Astoria's parks and recreation program. Tigard School District recreation facilities that may not be As Mahler sees it,the first step in determining the com- used by Tigard residents who live within the Beaverton munity's recreation needs is taking an inventory of local School District. But he agreed that permitting more people facilities that might be available and polling the public to to use local recreation facilities would be another attractive determine its wants. alternative. On the job in Tigard since late July,Mahler has begun the User fees could be Implemented to pay for local recre- Inventory and next week will canvass door-to-door. ation,Mahler said.Forming a separate taxing district,how- "The first thing we need to do 1s determine If there Is any ever,could"incur some extraordinary management costs," Interest within the community,"Mahler said. thereby Increasing the community's tax burden and compll- The next step, he added, will be to determine whether citing the Issue,the consultant warned. w� r h, Al TM or"w tan/W=MT EACH RECREATION SPECIAUST John Mahler begin next week to gauge community Interest in recreation. Q C:r e „ O O O O OW vawmO cn 6 _ _ .+ 16 w �[t to ut in_w - w p V O Q 14 qr 104 r 41 f G+Dz co 1 O 1 p O o1 O88000 N IN- 79 �-tr'p eF w in O 0O 1 O� w m �o O C; Icz r+ mcho � � � a a %D 0 C a •r4 o cc Aj J q . « .e C6'Q i •0 6t a •L �L.+ }+ o w o C � t; L 86 a � LLO w spa ° ° .-+ L q = 2 :50 > OwrOiL L N- fA ffi W > o~qc CQ q e� Q� � N aa ccc c C9 > y� C 11r C N „ a N (/y C 8 U. O40 aJ C .q yc 0 )� L� W J 1 w.-* r N L6 Q a OC W q y n'"e t W H Q w q O 8L1 G !6 aL Oc t•- a �- > e ro m 3 0 to o +� y idwo w e O wt�r waa ++ s+ o 0 O 3= C7 F- ue G7 t� N en cn 0 X v ij 41 C L Leo " w%D8e 888880 40 W a c% w m �o a w C1 d � L W O O O pC� NwOO Cq W..4 to m m +t! 0 .4 C in to 0 0q *' ate $ ,� ,e a 8 rtes 4 a a Wa 40 to 40 to m m ..� ..+ ey m pw 40 8 a In - Op0 p L L7 U6� J w �j A q ¢eh A p� to v O. �+ Q co m�w a m n A w .� oOe 6 o m I� ) 1�- ¢ ^ 41 16 a`% te e`, � in r m � eN Q � � L6 40 iJ N .-e f\ w 0 CD u 4z CD I L6 Go u LCI CD %0 V- N OP .+ a MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: BUDGET COMMITTEE MARCH 26, 1985 FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR i f SUBJECT: GENERAL GOVERNMENT (Non-Departme tal and City Atturney) Detail General Government: Non-Departmental 601 - Professional Services o-0-... -0-, but may need $2,500 for ongoing Labor Negotiations 602 Contract Services - -0-... 9 QUp ,-0'� *oo co-r, -0-, pending decision on Computer Masten 610 - Repair and Maintenance of Facilities W $25 000.. , ,7170 �- Shops V 2,000 'I City Hall 8 @ $1,200 6 4 @ $3,000 - $21,600 {{ Supplies @ $1,400 t 612 - Repair and Maintenance of Office Equipment Copier Drums 4 300 1,200 Copier Maintenance @ $2,955 W.P. Computer Maintenance @ $6,000 D.P. Computer Maintenance @ $6,144 613 - S ecial De artmental s $601000... Employee Awards and Recognition @ $1,000 7 Civic Center Moving Costs @ $10,000 - Civic Center Furnishings from FY 84/85 Carryover @ $43,000 Wellness Program Carryover from F 4 85 @ $6,000 -f-now P.A►55 /'?'j1 620 - Office Su lies and Expenses 25,700... Letterhead and Paper 8,000 f 0WO 7VAAV AOL 4. Newsletter Postage (6 @ $950) $5,700 fvt`S General Postage @ $11,000 Misc. Supplies @ $1,000 �7 621 - Advertizin and Publicity - $4,8(0... . PO Newsletter Printing (6 800) 4,800 622 - Fees and Licenses - $9,000...- -- Recording 9 000...- -Recording Fees 2,000 Election Costs (2 @ 2,500) $5,000 Old City Hall Tax (1/2 Year) $1,000 Misc. Taxes and Fees $1,000 623 - Dues and Subscriptions: $16,750.. Chamber 150 f 135V Metro (@51e per Pop.) $9,500 Boundary Commission @ $1250 67c p� ��✓ League of Oregon Cities @ $5,000 `` Local Government Personnel Institute @ $750 General Government Detail Page 2 �D;��A March 26, 1985 S��3UD �� 630 - Rents and Leases ... Crow Building (6 4,700) 28,200 +3(217270 �-f /0o Court (6 @ $250) $11500 Library (6 @ $1,200) $7,200 Old City Hall Parking $1,000 �3 �' DO r 3 Grp Sub-Total $37,900 ,3S0 Current WPIDP (2 @ $3,195) $6,390 ,yam�� — Sub--Total $44,290 !UI,4 50 Copier Leases (#210 4 @ $520) $2,080 Copier`Leases (#400 4 @ $1,493) $5,972 Sub-Total $52,342 *Computer Master Plan Lease Purchase- , 62 '/V Cavr-� (5 year H/W and S/W) _ TOTAL,RENTS AND LEASES• 631 - Utilities: Electric (Parks e W ewers @ $1,800; Shops @ $2,500; P.D.Storage-@ $200; P.D. Bldg. 6 @ $250 $1,500; Civic Center @ $1,000/mo s $6,000 a $13,000... 'Phones @ $40,000... ($33,000 in 84-85) Ca!. (Civic Center @ $12,000`and Shops @ $4,000) $16,000 Water ('Parks @ $10,000 and Civic Center @ $2,500) $12,500 Sewer @ $600 . *Phone System 632 Insurance 43 00 ... Building an roperty ($3,600 in 84-85) $20,000 Comprehensive Liability ($12,980 in 84-85) $15,000 Umbrella Liability ($2,700 in 84-85) $3,500 Bonds and Surety_(5 @ $600) $3,000 False Arrest $1,500 40a 335,da o NOTE: * Not yet committed 0775p ;u fi . 2 TIGARD LIBRARY F460-A, F460-B May 13, 1985 FURNISHINGS BUDGET - MASTER PLAN SUMMARY SHEET PREVIOUS NEW SUBTOTALS SUBTOTALS General Area Wood Library Furniture Custom Furniture Young Adult Area `', . ... Chidiren's Area N'liLArl,' Shtl i' L+�n� t Librarian's Office a 7 Staff Lounge { -- TOTALSfi/E �:f lvt04, z s2 - s l 2a r .1 LU Cli Oi CL: r W o a Q f o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q 0 0Z CA 0 o a o 0 W 0 m O O N N O a S 1� CD ^ N �"- N M M Yom-. Ln O O - Q�1 CSO N rn .�- ` ' .. X M ui O Q Q M Q LA pp n ^ M N tD ty Z7 N O N •. m c0 to N t"! n Ln M W Z r.. o 0 o p o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 4? Z o 0 0 0 0 o a o o a o o m d N o o c c Ln to -1O N N to N N --rM a� Nt . O a a O ,.. N N ^ to M M r r'1 ^ O '. O. W U r tD M m M tm co ? a N 10-1 ._.. CL N Q N N _Z L Un ti V -C - m E u m w v u _ a U- m U - U m o Z p dp 4-• 3 to 3 4+W V� x x x .� o N r 4- r '3 x x CO x O � � aj mp f° m m Q � J Q. U oO cx OU LU U -D D p n _ N M - - - _ U m m w .0 • M -- N N U -� N �'. V Ql M ^ti Ln U U N uLn N O N A U (A IAO NQ rya (A NQ m QLLJ �-° O �O a) a) O a) a7 O N H <C L y U u C4 qu a7 3 u 3V E y yr V v} i .0 J mc 49 -1 < .0 J C rJ Q Z W to U ~ F.'•l !—� C•. .cam t .� J - O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vl D '-- r� o r•i r ^ o 0 Co r` _o to Lu O m N N Q CD h ? M O O to W _ O C C? O O , O O O l/1 to to +^ to to N r' tt] {� W N N N r r t••"f 3 U u1 , Z _ d Z Q O O O QI p p p CS O inc, to M to C) L• 0 O 0 U; O . O to C N Ln G) O to to cn to m to h N > N �• OJT tL co ui V m O to Lt' N v c 3 to v 3 s- m in c .. 3 `O 3c L O dA L i .gym N w M iT ST r CD C eo •� 2 to tn x 3 _ _ _ O _. Z O c `�' U s rn w OLn to S- w O m o °' �, t- rn a� 0 0 3 0 0 -X Q` H n in .. o C s _ CL 0 0 -- � N s U - o .D Q -. r. V =r .r t to > to f c� im- o n C tn f6 E- V 0 0 o c L to to `° 0 0 H c 0 0 330 to C Z tn CA E to s Q Q y s o tn .61 CL Q 'r — to — •D 3. . V cl C a v Lw �,= o m �- s' GOi O.ss � m - i 0 U to O LU Y �. R ivp t- LL -a3 D� �cNQa� -a A w N E V �; m _O O i m 0) -s, .. _ O O m e to 7 J a OC -0 cc to O J CL LL h > 3 r .o to v 3 tJ) >` to fA Q fl 6 w to to h oo tT O r -N rh .7. to PZ : w r r r r N N N N N N LU s LA W • }'', Ln ti cc 411 N '. 'M 0. - O O O O. O O O O O O M. p O rr. O O O Q O A p O O O O O O >� I N �• m to r r .? M N al N N p LL 1 O SS (�C m M O t0 Ql I� r 3 a M j U •� r N N N (� r Q1 N N �' r x Cry LU _ C E.•H •�`~� O O O O O O O O O O O O O �•- O O O O Co Cl O O O O Cl O p 1>-y ai it; Ln Ln 14 C4 ai a vN n n M m co rn N co to y M to Ln M N' co rn � o m CL w p L r r Z O Z O O G] O O O Q Zpry N M N N N O > U ~ r r N N �".`.. w 0L a. Q LU >: LL i V d O .r4 M N r M r r Ln M Z. cn p Ln 3 3 Z Q Ln a x x � ,� .. Ln p S S = Z _ - } 0 _ coo m .. 0 U 3 ® z ,0- A LLL - - B Q to D y in s - Q C C a O Y @ S Lc •� •� 'U d F- L° p w F Q w In. t; > LLI }' Ll •d.Y Z Ln w ut M y -C vt O �- Z Lv }- p T- .a to H Ln fnL U U w u , w u" 8 F- CA tT C m 3 Orn O O U U <, M Lp t E of >- LI] x C c L U i N O 3 x 3 }i Q L LL N a� Q .D' i '� .� ai _ a`°i a`°i m u p Cy � C U i J N U in � Z _ LC w Q' U a G � J � 2 = tPI 9L � i- � . I Q Lu to n co cn o N rn Ln to r- co m V.LIZ LU N - O N N N M M m m M M M m M M _ ui f, i uj Z WLn LU ` m M } 1Ln ~ 1 a o , A Q } c o c w O u o o Q y cn C o 0 0 wp M Ln n tr N o ro t ca ._ �, U Lnn N co 6 3 co Ln M e x w `.i J zn O n o : ._ LU r` M :� ro N — o 0 0 0 0 O to rs , Q c� va Cv r 3 U n L�1 co anr~ .- L LU to U &n to cn N - ce ce d r 111 J to Q Ln UCy Z U, Z01 E Q a � Ln m U. v. Oro a• o cn is in C }- Z: LL N D ro O 'L a J3 O Z � 4 � w cn U ro C U O C O .0 N 1 i 1 oLU 00' p ca W 4. i �3 •p w Q 'p Q _! ro v i O a 3 x 1 U W Z C ro ro m Y"O Q i ui E '^ ~ a 'C �_ n' R� C T ZJ1 Q v W O Q ro -p O 1n d C '3 C C p M C to W �' U N A U LU sL � � � p wm LL = - C au rn U o } O = ro '^ aai M m p 0 O O 0 o y C w �' E ? >L o� C cn s o U s- m ro .+ w so O co CO - U U U- Y ¢ Y Q J .0 w 0 OJ J g U. p C? Q y�. p r p ed H rn Z Ln iv V I' to O a t- a U >- - n LL,Ln L Lu M a - W co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o Z N o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o v o V o W O O co O N N 3' C11 N cT N O Q C O C.Q F- U r Ln N to un, N cn CT m ui o o R XIn tr'1 CO Ln N M co O N a 3 to 3 �"� O O to co o o 0 0 0 _ o _ o 0 0 0 = VI o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OU; Q1 N lf5 ?t U to f- co en lD N Ln Q C11 f`• N LLJ aH c o n o 0 0 0 0 0 Z - W H � � o (� CY N N V Z Z N H U M ct: E 0 o M l= to U ¢ O Z S to II1 + C) O N eo = .� .Q a. p ., x x cQ X. .� y_, _N fo N 4) LD of Z to O M 0.as v to ' O ., Y J O N U (n rn as °; to LLI Q M t� 0 c l cp41 !+ S- 4) O Z W to 'C7 co 0 -- t 0 = O L i CL2. .X (�/ ca ` F- 3 N ` a E o Lt1, U U p � as 4) +� 0 U `_ o m o y o E - 4 � F- -0U p a O J i ca U II1'O ai 't7 a c E o 0 7�n L y to > 'o v Ors a� i i a� o R m a� z U g J = Vo W' d C v m C] U a' to d LL V 1 �.V cl Zn. co 01 O .-- N M =rto %D t1 co Q O -CL s LLJ LLJ W Ln �. m a ' toui ` h\• cl C) O O p A.. p O O O O O O O O V O O O O O O O O A O O O A O A C O Z N lC In O OO q r- c7' to In M N to to N W0 M O �' cm LO �' N r- co ^ Ln in O1 N3:° U M C1 co iT M M M �" N O M W r, M W n p q p c q p o A o 0 o p o O O A O O A O O O O O O O O �p ® xr l0 (n 07 co r` CK) rr In to Im N W N Z Z p O O O O O O O O O O O O O �.. . O O.. '.¢ . .. : N LO to N C14 O O O O O O S q O O 0 "' M M M to cp to � � p0 rot CL ua U of w W a >: N O m w M in U Z N i ar o - :: a a `a = in v � U x x x u ° m u H m [L Q C3 E'� U S rr d 'O Q m ?� w (n !n a a p N to = } w0 ^o cc cin i U p co H L U i 'O M Ln j H ¢ 0. m y 01 C m vU y c .a �. rn CL 'u � a LU ¢ ¢I 3 N.= N .9 V f... N U L O ✓ d U is N ., U N ° rz U ¢ Q ,a .L _y o .y c j o o o .. > to t!) L v ° � a m :3 _ a) C) :3 >- :3 d m U Z Z ¢ cam, U arm N U U Q W U - a U U 0- X x W W Ln to to ^ n W ^ ^ W V ` W Z4, W z Co (i } to Q.. s W p o 0 0 0 0 z U o o w O o co m }' V p .- X — N LU o p o p t3 Ln to CD •- N O co ^ d U w co Z �- C p p O C C z o p p p p Ln co :. O ^ M N O W - _ w ICL.. N Ji Lncr�.. •.- .- R U In z � z U d U) s C U- n U ) t Ln f1 ro }, ca m to U o Lq.x at 3 v cn p "' w ,- U 2 p C d C C3 O a •- W - U U :0 3 - 1— CL U - uz U -0 '� 1- O f0 3 N Q fO t y CL Q Z W 0 V1 = v w Ly 02-0 LZU ¢ w o � Q �� No Cr o � �` U W D N 0 -0 C LL N i rn -i o i , w J C mea ° Y 3 � r' x v o s— cu E V N U CO is ++ U y r m N C C Z p 'L a d U M O U m 2 C13 Q J Q 1— -0 cu = uj C) d Wp. 0.� � p ¢ LL co C�lr N r.+ C7 01—� w cn r- oo m F- m o F- CLU ~ J In Z ^. 12 p %D to pQ +^!l 1 CL to W m O OO co cla 0 Ln co -W C3 �o LO co Clb f OC W C� to W 9 1 n 3 G07 O z aC m O O to vuj A f t 8 � � w o m � Iz U'% ¢ 0 Cal N N A14 i 0. p T W O u 0 p a C c h � U 4J CO rT do � aw C� O � M W W O U 3x O h4? 0 W. X W C L 4 Go » •-�tett W p W z 3 0 3 L L C cc N Lo-, a ++ 0 4 16 W J a En Q WN C ¢ WC* u0 c. O•r Ki a t7 O .-aN .� N O tom+ a o J .r " i 1W- m O \3 A a ++ o C to 1 +1 a o V) W co co (�•.j co a L L ti gdo+ N Q N E 0. �� cz cc Ch L a W- 0 N I co ••� G 41F W 1 O I � � a c r, tw' c U a `.� v a °' ° oot ;: t Z w LIZ Ili L6 0 mU a� �p •o rt co ¢ v a L p J c a al 3 ¢ 0 eu C7 Z to f H 2 mW W Opp Ln Lr 0 0 co U a cli . in <C � N � M C� - N N �40 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF 8/19/85 AGENDA ITEM #; DATE SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION; ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: OUT OF TOWN TRAVEL DISCUSSION PREPARED BY: REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Budget Committee suggestion that Council personally review all out-of-town training travel and training expense authorizations above $100. No Council action as such has yet been taken. INFORMATION SUMMARY The timelines of recent requests has caused some difficulty.- Discussion by Council seems appropriate. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Council approval of all out-of-town training travel and training expense over $100. 2. Council approval of all out-of-state training travel and training expenses over $300. 3. Alternative SUGGESTED ACTION Option #2. 1 EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy ,is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is required. A copy Will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: Requested by: Vendor No.: PAYABLE TO: - ( ] Employee request attend [ ] Employer required attend For check run of . . [ ] Mail check ( j Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. . Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: Richard Debrare PAYABLE TO: . . . . . . . . Tigard Police - tswssswsssssssssssasssssws:sassssssaaassaceasncs=ss�_.=caasasasssaascsseaassassssasa Title of Program: Institution. or organization EBI FB� I instruction/ spanaeredby Corvalis, •P.D.•in Corvalis Registration Deadline 8-29-85 Training Dates From: 9-16-85 To. 9-20-85� Describe the purpose: Training needed to establish fingerprint expert within the Department as the State Lab will no longer examine fingerprints unless they are connected to person crimes only. Is this related to [XXI current position [ ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: [N/16 to be advanced fN/Aj to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... 0 Books**......*................. ........... ... _ Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... O- • ... 1 0-11100-62�s $40.0 " 5200.00 Per Diem........+ ............................. Other: -- Total $ 200.00 ss¢a:sswsssasaacroswasa�asaawwsasmassaixsmaaoacaaacaoa=aaaoa=aaoaas.rs==aaaaa=s.aasassaa Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenal f. Employee Signature: //�� Q Date �1 Appropriation balance; 1,239.00_ Manager: [�] approved [ j disapproved Dept. Heads 1,IQ approved [ j disapproved (explain): Finance Director: CITYOFTIGARD EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form, is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other forms of, either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A follow up report is equi ed. A copy will be placed inour personne File. DATE OF, REQUEST: �_ Requested by: Vendor No.: PAYABLE TO C ( J Employee request attend Employer requir.d attend �- Q For check run of11' -- ,[SCJ Mail check ( J Notify dept. when ready Vendor No. : Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO: A PAYABLE TO: SaS' Asy4i�Z tb S-r. As j►..Aa/a CSP- Q S.� AT EV R -S* - cn cs asaaaa*ssassae�o=�saamsss aeaaaazaaysa.. ..amasaass.... e.....m....... ......aaesaa Title of Program:' Institution or organizati n Registration Deadline 'g Training Dates From:91ffl&— To: c� Describe the purpose: Is this related to PWI-1 current position [ ) reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: [)CJ to be advanced--[ to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount egistration or tuition....... . 10-13000 Books.. ... ... Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... jib, appn..� �- Lodging....................... ......... ......... Per Diem........................................ Other: Total $ /vtO.S(o• -ae=aasmrsaa=a=aasaacasasaaaamxaaaasaszsaamasass=a_oaaaccasssesaaaaaaaaauaassa=ao Authorizations: _ I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures made on my behalf. Employee Signature: Dater -/� ('_• Appropriation balance:4v--1/-.A36a9 nager=disapproved 14--rapproved j J disapproved Dept. Head: _ [ J approved [ J (explain): _ Finance Director: Snes. ..-Q Y• -" Oregon Association for Court Administration GACA NAME: _,I r �' 1'� CsE ©2z COURT OR AGENCY: -(j el PC � l��(J 1 C ► S��-L `�f�Z' ADDRESS : -7 Arat F4 _ A 9-71a PHONE NUMBER: REGISTRATION_FEE Member: $40.00 $ 4D- � Non-Member or Late Registration: $65.00 $ A LA CARTE PROGRAM FEE Per Session $ GUEST MEALS Dinner $20.00 $ Luncheon $ 7.00 $ SHAKESPEARE s Well That Ends Well " $5. 50 per ticket $ _ s - WINDBREAKERS X- ma 1 ( ) Small ( ) Medium { ) Large { ) X-Large ( ) $20.00 PERMANENT NAME TAG $5.00 $ Please print your name and court, county, agency or how you would like to be identified on your tag. NAME MARGR FnR7.A I.D. TTr ARn M TWTCTPAT. COURT SPRING CONFERENCE PHOTO go x 79 Photo $3.0 0 8° x 10" Photo $5.00 TOTAL ENCLOSED $ N�''• 5"O PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM BY AUGUST 20 TO: Susan Elliott, OACA Treasurer 17221 SE Webster Road Gladstone OR 97027 **REMEMBER** CALL THE- ASHLAND HILLS INN DIRECTLY FOR RESERVATIONS (503) 482-8310 An orgaftation of Cour Administration personnel:Court Cberks.Cour Administrators and otters striving to better Court Adnunistratbon EDUCATION/TRAINING REQUEST This form is to be used for conferences, seminars, college classes and other, !/ forms of either training or education. Documentation is required, a copy is to be attached to this form. Attachments for mailing may also be attached. A -.� follow up report is required. A copy will be placed in your personnel file. DATE OF REQUEST: 8-1-85 Requested by: ` ... Vendor No.: PAYABLE TO: Western States Safe & Burglary [X ] Employee request attend Association. 8,6� Las Vagas Metrn Polire Wept. [ ] Employer required attend 400 •E ;we_ For 'check run of • • . . Ln vada 891F, ( j Hail check '7,3i A (xxl Nots fy dept, when ready Vendor No.. ��.-� Vendor No. : PAYABLE TO{M ��,,, c'�OQ�.fT%� 'PAYABLE TO: . . - . . . . . , . . ittiaatl[.taaaaa0amaaaaaaIILaa$aaaaaIIaaIIraaaaIIIISaasaSaaCII aCa IIsaaaaBIIaCRa@iaiaal6aaMaa Title of Program: Western States Safe& Burglary Investigators Seminar Institution or organization Western States Safe & Burglary Association: • Registration Deadline 8-10-85 Training Dates From:10-7-85 - To: • 10-10-85 Describe the purpose: To obtain vital training, intelligence information concerning burglars, and their M.0.'s. To present suspect intelligence information concerning recentsafeburglaries occurring our area to other agencies that may have contact with suspects in future. Is this related to [XXX current position [ ] reasonable promotion or transfer? Explain: TRAINING COSTS: ( j to be advanced [ ] to be reimbursed after attendance Account No. Amount Registration or tuition......................... 10-11100-625 $75.00 Books.*......#... .............».. ....... n... _C10100 Travel (mileage, bus, train, airplane, etc.).... to 00,00 Lodging........:................................ /0-1igy- &2 $38.52/ .$154.08 Per Diem....................................... . 00.00 Other: 0 Total t $229.08 saaesasasaaaaaaaasaaas=aaaaaaaa=aaaaaaaIIaaeIIaaaeIIaIIIIaanacoasaaIIoaaacsaaIIaaaaaaIIo Authorizations: I(employee), understand and agree that if all conditions of education/training policies are not met, I may be required to reimburse the City for any expenditures mad ,on yi b half. Employee Signature: �� 1„�l Date 8-1-35 Appropriation balance: Manager: i"7 ( ] approved [ ] disapproved. Dept. Head:-21eyr [X j approved [ ] disapproved (explain): n Finance Director: ETZE Las Vegas Metropolitan l Police Depal L1 ent LARRY L K Assistant Sheriff eri Sheriff ERGER. Staff Operations 400 EAST STEWART AVENUE DAN STOPKA. LAS VEGAS.NEVADA 89101 Assistant Sheriff PHONE 702/386-3111 Line Operations JOHN MORAN,Sheriff LARRY C.GOLDEN, Deputy Chief Technical Services Div. ERIC S.COOPER.Undersheriff THOMAS W.BIGGS.SR.. Deputy Chief Administrative Services Div. Greetings, JOHN L SULLIVAN. Deputy Chief Investigative Services Div. STEVE WAUGH. Deputy Chief Uniform Field Services Div. It's that time of year again and the Las Vegas GORDON F.VACH. Detention for- Metropolitan' Police Department is proud to be .hosting Dry Services Div. the 36th Annual Western States Safe and Burglary LOIS ROETHEL, Investigator's Association Seminar. Business Manager Fiscal Affairs Bureau We will be holding the Seminar at the Maxim Hotel and Casino, which is located at 160 Last Flamingo Road, Las Vegas , Nevada 59109 . The Seminar will be conducted from October 7th thru October 10th,eber57th, Registration will be conducted on Monday. 1955 from 3:00 _PM to. 7:00 PM. A hospitality suite- will also be open from 3:00 PM to 9 :00 PM 'for your enjoyment. The registration fee for the Seminar will be $75 .00 per person. A $15.00 late fee will be added tothose registrationose s received after August 15 , 1985 • e and registration fee includes the omluncheonsinar costs , (October 5th danish service each morning , . and 9th) , and a dinner banquet on October 9th. The registration fee does not include Hotel room costs, The Maxim Hotel has set aside a block of1ooms 00 sales for the Seminar and the prices are $36.00 p lus tax for a king bed or 2 double beds . Pre-registration at the Hotel is available, and a crust, so don' t forget to mail in your room reservation envelope that I've enclosed. Two local tours have also been arranged for those of you who wish to bring your spouses . I've enclosed material that outlines prices and a description of the tours for your information. We are still planning our class itinerary so more information will follow at a later date concerning the scheduled events. -2.9- �2TLG r "- T!),rte x _ d. We need to know how many people will be attending , so please fill out the attached registration form and mail it to: Sergeant Rick Bilyeu C/0 Las Vegas-Metropolitan -Police Department 400 East Stewart Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Please make checks payable to: Western States Safe and Burglary Association. If you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance , please don' t hesitate to contact me at (702) -386-3571. Sincerely, Rick Bilyeu , Se east RB/bmm Enclosures: Registration Form Sightseeing Tour Information Hotel Pre-Registration Envelopes CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 14, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Cable TV Franchise Renegotiations Report PREPARED BY: REQUESTED BY Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Review and renegotiation with Storer Cable of our MACC franchise. INFORMATION SUMMARY Councilor Scott agreed to be the Council's repre4Pntative in these renegotiations and can report on the progress at the 6 or so meetings to date. Additional staff information is also attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A SUGGESTED ACTION N/A lw/3098A t MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council August 15, 1985 FROM: Joy Martin, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Cable Franchise Renegotiating Policy Committee Report The policy issue is the cable franchise agreement. Storer Metro has requested changes and M.A.C.C. has agreed to negotiate with Storer Metro. Before any changes can be made to the agreement ALL MEMBER JURISDICTIONS must approve the recommended changes. These changes as negotiated are scheduled to be before each of the governing bodies between September 9, upon approval by M.A.C.C., and October 15. This summary and the attachments, including our position for renegotiations, is prepared in preparation for this decision. At the second meeting of the Committee they set a timeline for themselves which set August 12 as the date they will be prepared to respond to Storer Metro's April 1 request to renegotiate portions of the contract. The Committee met their timeline and had their first meeting with Storer Metro on August 12. The meetings leading to this stage of the process were designed to familiarize the appointed members with the issues, allow time for citizen input, and decide on M.A.C.C. 's negotiation position. The meetings and their primary purpose are listed below: June 20 Present background information to members July 2 Continue previous discussion and determine how the committee should proceed July 8 Presentation by Storer Metro to the Committee on their request, videotaped and cablecast on the system July 25 Discussion of issues (attended by Councillor Scott) July 29 Public Hearing, videotaped and cablecast on the system August 1 Discussion of contract issues, including ones not cited by Storer Metro, to begin to outline options August 7 Continuation of above discussion (a Tigard representative was unable to attend) August 9 Voting on options outlined for each contract issue in order to give direction to the renegotiation team A renegotating team was appointed from the Committee so there will not be 21 people trying to negotiate at the table. The Committee plans to have the renegotiations completed, approved by the Committee and forwarded to the M.A.C.C. Board for approval by August 30. This may require the Committee meeting again to clarify positions. The M.A.C.C. Board will consider the recommendations on September 6, and if approved, requests for ratifications will be made to each member jurisdiction. They plan on having all ( ratifications by October 16. Attached is an outline of the position the ` Committee is presenting to Storer Metro, as prepared by M.A.C.C. for the Board. i (09A5p) i METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA' DETAILS AUGUST 21, 1985 1 VI. FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATION A. Franchise Renegotiating policy Committee Update The Committee accomplished its first task on Friday, August 9. At that time, the Committee provided negotiating positions, to the Renegotiating Team (Huffman, Young, Maul, Killpack, Scheans, Cooper and Tierney), on the items Storer Metro requested as well as additional items the Committee thought were appropriate for renegotiations. The items to be discussed are list;ed below:, Storer Metro initiated items 1. Public Communications Network 2. Community Access Television 3. Interactive Services 4. Construction S. Free cable service and free cable drops for public institutions 6. Franchise Fees 7. Rate Regulation 8. Emergency AlertCapability 9. Status Monitoring 10. Interconnection to other cable systems 11. Modification for Videotext 12. References to the Franchise Proposal MACC initiated items 1. Term of Franchise 2. Quality of Service: Issues include telephone answering, trouoble call service response and technical performance 3. Interactive capacity and capability 4. Program Lineup Channel Changes S. Advance on Franchise Fees 6. Performance Bond { 7. Marketing of Residential System The positions were determined by a consensus of the Committee. A worksheet was prepared with each possible item listed. Each item also s listed a number of options. The complex items, such as PCN, had multiple options while the more straightforward ones, such as emergency alert capability, had two options, i.e., agree with request or reject request. The Committee members individually reviewed each item, independently selected an option they felt most comfortable with, and then all Committee E members present shared their thoughts. Sixteen of twenty-one members were present. A summary of the positions is attached. The Renegotiating Team met with Storer Metro on August 12 and meetings were scheduled for August 14, 19 and 21. METROPOLI,TAN_AREA__COMMUNICATI.ONS_COMMISSION FRANCHISE_.RENEGOTIATING_POLICY,COMMITTEE NE60TIATI,NG_POSITION_AS_COMMUNICATED_TO_,THE_NE60TLATIN6.,TEAM AUGUST 9 _1985 S�or�r Metro Regue�ted_Renegot iat�ot�,�3,t�ms_(►_vath._Committ��.,�_,.posit ions) 0 1. TURN PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK OVER TO MACC. o Want Network to continue to operate. o Willing to accept the PCN, but some j.-:fewest in Storer Metro continuing to operate. o Public users should pay user fees. o If MACC accepts the PCN, operator should be a ,joint venture or third party; financing should be proviced by franchise fees, Storer Metro and Third Party. 2. TURN COMMUNITY ACCESS TELEVISION OVER TO MACC. i o Willing to have someone other than Storer Metro operate. o Primary source of financing should be Storer Metro. o Franchise fees might be used, in part. 3. DROP REFERENCES TO INTERACTIVE SERVICES. _ o Delay implementation; continue some periodic reporting. 4. CONSTRUCTION. o Willing to negotiate a line extension policy for isolated residences, new subdivisions and multiple dwelling units. 5. CEASE FREE RESIDENTIAL SERVICE NETWORK SERVICE/FREE DROPS TO PUSLIC INSTITUTIONS. t I o Can charge for service. ', o Negotiate a cost sharing formula for drops between Storer Metro and the institutions and establish reasonable time frames. MACC RENEGOTIATING POSITION MACC AUGUST ,9, 1985 5. REDUCE FRANCHISE FEES. o No reduction in fees. 7. DEREGULATE RATES. o No deregulation of rates at this time. S. DROP EMERGENCY ALERT REQUIREMENT. o' Concern for emergency capabilities on residential system; willing to negotiate. 9. DROP INTERCONNECT REQUIREMENT. s No change in existing language. 10. STATUS MONITORING. o Concerned with quality of service. Would like to have Status Monitoring to insure customers get good quality of service. 11. DROP REFERENCE TO VIDEOTEXT STANDARD. o Willing to negotiate. 12. DROPREFERENCES TO PROPOSAL. o Not willing to renegotiate. Only deal with specific items. MACC Reguested_Items_(with_Committee�posit.ion) e 13. FRANCHISE EXTENSION. o Willing to extend franchise term provided there is a mutually acceptable solution to' all• items. 14. QUALITY OF SERVICE. o Want specific language, such as that contained in Resolution ' 85-01, -to insure good customer service. - t MACC RENEGOTIATING POSITION MACC AUGUST 9, 1985 15. INTERACTIVE CAPABILITY AND CAPACITY. o , Want to see all of theResidentialService Network fully capable and with capacity at time of introduction of interactive services. 16. PROGRAM LINEUP CHANGES. o New language to reflect Cable Act and recent court decisions. 17. FRANCHISE FEE ADVANCE. o This is an economic issue that can be on the table dependent upon the resolution of other items.. 18. PERFORMANCE BOND. o Can reduce the amount of the Performance Bond at the conclusion of all phases of construction. 19. RESIDENTIAL SYSTEM MARKETING. o Would like to see this item included in renegotiations. NEMS_WHICH_THE_.COMMITTEE_ELECTED_NOT_TO INCLUDE_IN_RENEGOTIATIONS_. 1. SECURITY FUND: Opposed to any reduction in the Security Fund. 2. VCR AND CABLE READY TELEVISIONS: Opposed to discussing this issue during renegotiations. 3. CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP: Elected not to make any changes in existing Franchise Agreement language. WJT/t tnm _ r x _y N a ' +. •fes., y, v' NOW :: fees 'mnb�'s �.�� some. ��J�aaea Moore;attarne eppre�eat�ag"5toirer 1 ` � �yy '� tba}if St�arMc3co� 40 VDUV ` q as3aa!to_Md=*eat. W. orvetwork's tirtuould bave t6 saabaidiae it by rxLdnB" Mace mt80� G3FB�bId6i� , said Storor.Wanted the ,"e p1 i ODa :! in, rjesposawty [or-thO eCa QA. bUt}fba!`SWren MGIC gtsa .was+mp�t.ttrptstbutln X100. `to keep !t'. 4` gciala ' aclty+ � 8 Pig tt�tt Y qo Jorabq ares residents and gronpea a �; capa�; � far vie�viag ota�3toeer 1V�etra'�r1t 4-41 has bees �'r`aaacb�ie idi` a. `�� nr �t = bit dlaion a ,de to gunge�Dn His be$Inedatied in aboiaf .t4,06�1"aunt �-- $fit aaa_aaacrna e6iaaa i�aaxr.+}' ,�,,� turranver fgwart�eni: , gymjoF �inditlt �b aaM effasCace-is=fade aaaatmarte owas lit�a _ Storer;b[etre't�atasierfatevi€�` /CVonQw team taq.hili �$� �` �iietr��t��"� �'Hunlffnaan��' " �` � ►'� � lba� a�a�paitaotafiaaiep?si � �; ; ��. $-.�-Maarre4i sai is t�a�`fa�aiae' � 3 ti �i-?.-.§.fx+_.,=+�?5 �., \ � �f(ri Qi 'I12000 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33181-2710 (305) BSS-1000. f.- CVOMMMICAtIONS•ING .MARTHA J. BRODIE MAILING ADDRESS: ATTORN Ev P.0.Box 61-8000 (305)899.1000 MIAMI,.FL 33261-8000: EXT:4306 July 23, 1985 Mr. Bob Jean City Manager P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Notice of Federal Communications Commission(FCC)Filings Concerning Storer Metro Communications,lne.and City of Tigard,OR Dear Mr. Jean: Pursuant to the reporting and notice requirements set forth in the Franchise Agreement between Storer Metro Communications, Inc. ("Storer") and City of Tigard, Oregon, enclosed is a Restated and Amended Agreement of Merger and other documents, if applicable, recently filed with the FCC concerning our cable television franchise. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact the undersigned at our Corporate offices in Miami. Very truly yours 'Dicrated by Martha Brodie g/,We bur sigmd in her absence by her secretary. Martha J.Brodie MJB:bt Enc. cc: Warren Zwicky Gary Epstein Federal Express oin INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE TO Storer Cable System Manager for City of Tigard, OR SMDICR FROM William P. Burns COl�LiZ1 N1(:�7 t0."rS LtiC DATE July 25, 1985 12000 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD POST OFFICE BOX 61-8000 SUBJECT SK Merger with Storer Communications,Incorporated MIAMI,FL 33261-8000 (305)899-1000 In connection with the planned merger of Storer Communications, Incorporated with SCI Merger Corp., a corporation ultimately controlled by KKR Associates, legal counsel for both Storer and KKR are reviewing the laws, regulations, and franchise agreements relating to the 400 cable Ty agreements held by Storer. Els you know, the transaction will not have any effect on your day-to-day operation of the cable system, but in all cases,-we need either to notify or to obtain the prior consent of the`franchising authority before the transaction is consummated. Your help is needed ,in confirming that we are reviewing the right documentation and in giving us your insight into the local situation. Attached to this memo is a questionnaire for you to return to us and a copy of the portion of your franchise agreement relating to assignments and transfers. Some of the franchise agreements have no r.iecific'assignment or consent language. Please confirm that we are looking at the current franchise agreement by noting where Indicated on the questionnaire and answer the other questions on the form. We also welcome any other information or advice you may have, either in writing or by telephone. PLEASE RETURN THE ATTACHED QUESTIONNAIRE TO MARTHA BRODIE, HOME OFFICE LEGAL DEPARTMENT, BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY BY JULY 31, 1885. cc: James H Hall Jun Faircloth • guESTIONNA RE PLEASE ANSWER ONLY THE ITEMS MARRED "7- FROM: _ name . - 9 Carle TV Franchise (city) state X 1. Is the attached page the relevant portion from the current version of your franchise agreement concerning assignments and transfers of control of the franchise or the franchisee? YES NO (If no, please attach correct information) J 2. Our review indicates that we do not need to obtain prior consent or approval from the franchising authority. (We will, however, send a letter describing the transaction.) Do you-agree that prior consent or approval is not necessary? YES, prior consent or approval is not necessary. NO, prior consent or approval will be needed. X 3. Have there been other recent assignments or transfers in your area that we should know about? YES NO } If yes, describe: X 4. Please tell us anything about the local politics of the situation about which we should be aware. Are there elected officials or other - - individuals we should talk to first? Will the municipality seek to extract, concessions from us if prior consent is required? Anything else? If necessary, please use back of form or attach an additional n Page- Thank you for your help. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY TO: MARTHA BRODItE AT STORER COMMITNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, 12000 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33181-2710 BY JULY 31, 1985. Please call(305) 956-3786 if you have questions or further comments. COMM Li]LC��fc O�s (�"��. or au'-hority the same as, similar to or different from the rights, privileges or, authority herein set forth, in the same or other streets and public ways or public places by franchise, permit or otherwise. This franchise shall not . be sold, leased, mortgaged, assigned or otherwise transferred, nor shall any of the rights or privileges herein granted or_ authorized f� be leased, assigned, mortgaged, sold or transferred, either in �{ whole or in part, nor shall title hereto, either . legal or equitable, or any'.right, interest :or property herein, pass to or vest in any person, except the Grantee, either by act of the Grantee or by operation ofs law,. without the -consent of the } Grantors, expressed in writing. The granting of such consent in - one instance shall not render unnecessary any subsequent consent in another instance. r, The Grantee, upon any transfer as heretofore described, shall within sixty (60) days thereafter file with the Grantors through the Commission. a copy of the deed, agreement,. mortgage, lease, or other written instrument evidencing such sale, lease, i mortgage, assignment or transfer, certified and sworn to as correct by ,the Grantee. Every such transfer as heretofore described, whether vol untary or involuntary, shall be deemed void and of no effect unless Lr. Grantee shall within sixty (60) days after the same shall havebeen made, file such certified copy as is required. The Grantee shall promptly notify the El Grantors through the•Commission' o€ any proposed change in, transfer of, or acquisition by any, other party of control of the Grantee. Such change in control shall make this franchise subject to revoca- tion unless and until the Grantors shall have given written consent �.; thereto. For the purpose of determining whether they will consent to such change, transfer, or acquisition of control, Grantors may inquire into the qualifications of the prospective controlling party to perform the obligations of the Grantee under this franchise agreement. The Grantee shall assist Grantors in any such f inquiry. The Grantors may condition said transfer upon the terms and conditions as it deems appropriate. 3.7 Franchise Acceptance. The Grantee, together with Storer L Broadcastirig Company, an Ohio corporation, and Metro-West, Inc. , an EOregon Corporation (hereinafter parent corporations) , within - thirty (30) days after the tender by the Commission to Grantee of L' the franchise agreements adopted by each Grantor shall file in the office of the city recorder, city clerk, county clerk or other appropriate official for receipt of correspondence for a Grantor , a written acceptance executed by Grantee and its parent corporations, �• . in a form approved by the Commission. Parent corporation, Storer Broadcasting Company, by executing and filing the acceptance, guarantees performance by Grantee- of all Grantee's obligations hereunder and agrees to perform those obligations on Grantee's behalf, if so ordered by Grantors through the Commission, in the event Grantee for any reason within its control fails to FRANCEISE AGREEMENT -, page 20 . t CITY OF JIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 12, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: ), DATE SUBMITTED: _August 2, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Quarterly Report April-- June, 1985 PREPARED BY: Community Development REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached for your information is a copy of the second quarterly report for 1985, prepared by the Department of Community Development. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Accept and place on file. SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place on file. TIGARD OUARTERLY REPORT April — June. 1985 BUILDING AND PLANNING ACTIVITY — DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN.M- DEVELOPMENT UIL inn PERMITS April - June April -June 1985 1984 Single Family No. Units. . ... . . . . . . . . . . 71 52 High and Low Unit Value $128,000.00 to $49,500.00 $103,000.00 to $49,000.00 Largest Unit Size. . . . . . 3,500 sq, ft. 2,724 sq. ft. Smallest Unit Size. . . . . 1,542 sq. ft. 1,641 sq. ft. Duplex No. Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 High Value Per Unit $82,000.00 None Low Value Per Unit $82,000.00 None Multi--Family No. Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 Average Value Per Unit $38,500.00 $34,000.00 Largest Unit Size. 11581 1,308 Smallest Unit Size. . . . 1,581 1,308 (0674 +) ..- UIL®.InG _P ITS April - June, 1985 Commercial and Industrial , Proposed Use Square Footage value General Telephone Co. Storage Building 988 $ 38.000.00 City of Tigard Civic Center 31.333 $1,700,000.00 Utility Equip. Co. . Storage Building 3,960 $ 21.000.00 Bob Hudson Center Commercial 17,800 $ 37.000 OTHER Nona i t i Number of Commercial/Industrial Permits this period: 7 FY to date: 22 4 . - 4 ` nE , PROJECTS April - June. '1985 Subdivision Approvals # Lots Range Lot Size inter (S 2-85) 6 7 - 8,500 sq. ft. Krueger (S 3-85) 63 5 - 6,000 sq. ft. laser Homes (S 4-85) 19 14 -30,000.7sq. ft. Barron Const. (S 6-85) 10 5 - 7.000 sq. ft. gown (S 7-85) 14 0.5 1.5 acres - Industrial Krueger (S 8-85) 22 5 - 6,000 sq, ft. w LP outhern Pacific (MLP 3-85) 2 Commercial Liarman (MLP 4-85) 2 Residential ra►ss (MLP 6•-85) 3 Residential ahl (MLP 7-85) 3 Residential acobs (MLP 8-85) 2 Residential ble/Turner (MLP 9-85) 2 Residential 1ti-Family Proiects Units Status one _ rcial and Industrial - Site Developnent Reviews Square Footage Status in Street (PD 1-85) 221,000 A oRock (SDR 3-85) 50,000 A aA, (SDR 4-85) 8.400 A /8-Construction (SDR 5-85) 15.000 A reco, et, ail. (SDR 6-85) 11.000 A szman (SDR 7-85) 21102 A RFD Publishing (SDR 8-85) 19,670 A f' R. = Application Received Approved , - `Completed r x neW WsinESS TAX RECEIPTS April - June, 1985 Name Address Emal— o�---vaes TTVPQ 4 Convenience Store 7-I1 Food Store #16394 10650 SW McDonald St. 2 Food Supplement AJ Lab, Inc. 9399 SW Tigard Ave. 44 Athletic Footwear AVIA Athletic Footwear 16160 SW Upper ens Fry Gen. Contractor 12270 SW Summer'crest 2 Arave Construction Co. plumbing Contractor Bridgeview Plb.. Inc. 6287 Firwood Dr. , W.Linn 1 Dog Food Distr. Champion Pet Products 14635 SW 72nd Ave. 1 Children's Clothing Charlotte's Children 11940 SW Pacific Hwy 20 Moving & Storage Chipman Corp. 10685 SW Gx^eenburg Rd 4 Leased Trucks Clarke, Bill Trucking 7175 SW Baylor10 Mfg, Microcomputers Oatricon Corp. 16398 SW 72nd Ave. 2 Tool, Machinery, Furn. De Best Tools 12705 SW Pacific Hwy 1 Gen. Contractor Dorsey Homes, Inca 16231 S Oak Tree Terr. 3 General Car Repair H & H Auto Center 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 1 Consulting Engineer IECON 11315 SW Nova Ct. 1 Design PC Boards Intergraphics Oregon 6975 SW Sandberg #130 1 Gen. Contractor Island Mechanical 2515 N. Hayden Is Dr. 1 Gen. Contractor Joseph Hughes Constr. 10260 SW Nimbus #F�-2 5 Deli - Cafe K. C. Deli 15943 SW 72nd Ave. 5 Gen. Contractor Knapp's Remodeling 31210 48th P1 SW, FWay 1 Plumbing Contractor Kunselman Plumbing 1306 NW Hoyt, Ptld. 1 Building Contractor Linwood Construction Co 6006 SW Wilbard St/Ptld 3 Plumbing Master Plumbing 2408 12 Ave. , For. Gr. Video Sales, Svc. Microstar Comm. . Inc- 10120 SW Nimbus Ave. C-3 ii Remodel Contractor Northern Home Impr. Co 600 SW 10th #502. Ptld 4 Gen. Contractor OTKM Construction 5805 SW Hood, Ptld. 10 Garage doors Overhead Door 16670 SW 72nd Ave. nEW WsinESS TAX RECEIPT Pacific Psychological 6950 SW Hampton #310 1 Psychological Consult. Pacific Village Apts. 9655 SW McKenzie 5 Apartments' Reichow Constr. Co, 6262 SW Pamela. Ptld 1 GQnQral Construction RQitmaier Mechanical 7770 SW Nimbus Ave.Bvtn 5 Htg. & A/C Inst. & Svc. Scott Construction Co. 7000 SW Hampton #130 2 Construction-Remodeling Scott Plumbing Co. 36660 SE Hauglum Rd, Sdy 1 Plumbing Contractor Shimizu America Corp. 7100 Sw: Hampton 9121 3 Geis. Contractor Payior, Steven J. Const PO Box 235. -Hillsboro 1. Residential Contractor Yodaus Barber Shop 11571 SW Pacific Hwy 2 Barber Shop Young, moth Personnel 7110 SW Fir loop, #110 6 Executive Recruiting i ' (0674P) _ y ja E 3 ik 1 ;i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 'AGENDA OF: 8-19-85 •, � AGENDA ITEAi 0: DATE SUBMITTED: .8-12-85 PREVIOUS ACTION: IsswAGENOA TITLE: OLCC i License Aarpendment PREPARED BY: R.B. Adams, Chief of Police REQUESTED BY: Owner DEPAR114 T HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Review of all OLCC Dispenser Licenses ;.4 a INFORMATION SUMMARY SEiERW00D INN RESTAURANT & .LOUNGE, INC. 15700 S.W. Upper Boones Perry Rd., Tigard, OR Class A Dispenser New Owners: Craig S. and Peggy P. Banning r e The new owners named above are the owners of BANNINGS RESTAURANT on Pacific Highway. ALTERNATIVES_CONSIDERED i ` SUGGESTED ACTION � �w Recamlend approval and forwarding to 0.L.C.C. Respectfully, Y • _ = 1�f l-ice-,. �: L MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON T0: Chief of Police August 8, 1985 FROM: Loreen Wilson SUBJECT: OLCC Application Check Attached is a copy of the OLCC Application for new owners for the Sherwood Inn Restaurant and 'Lounge for a Class A license. The new owners are the same as Bannings Restaurant on Pacific Highway. If you need DOB information, please contact me, otherwise I will schedule this for the 8/19/85 Council meeting, Your approval would need to be received by Wednesday, 8/14/85. Thanks. lw/3077A �a �� n•�.,,...`.r'-- *!�� s;� ..a !-h F,,snow....._.:........,_. � : } x y TIN0. X624 amw m 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 Date j is TIGARD,OR 97223 - Address F Lot Block/MapSubdivision/Address Perm€t Vs Bldg. Plumb Cash Check tr' Sewer Other Other Rec. B .� Acct. No. Description Amount 10432 Buildin Permit Fees 10.431-800 Plumbin Permit Fees 10.431.801 Mechanical Permit Fees 10-230-501 State Sid 1.Tax 10.433 Plans Check Fee 34443 Sewer Connection 30 444 Sewer Inspection 51-448 Street S st.Dev.Charge 52-449.810 Parks I Syst.Dev.Charge 52-44820 Parks fl Syst.Dev.Charge 31-450 Storm Drainage Syst.Dev.Charge 10.430 Business Tax 10.434 Alarm Permit 0-227 Bail 14455- fines-Traffic/MisdlParking 1tk234 CPTA Traffic/MisdlVic.Asst. 14456 `- Indigent-Defense - 34122.401 Sewer Service/USA 30.122+402 Sewer Service/City 30°!>: 123 Sewer SevicelCity Maint. 125 Unmatched 31-124 Storm Drainage 7 Bancroft Pr n-_Pymt. 71 Bancroft int.Pymt.'. TOTAL' i 1.t.�,t.�47'f CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19 1985 -- g AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Director's Decision ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Communitv dated Auqust 9 1985 Development Land Use Decisions PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: William A. Monahan DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the final decision for Site Development Review SDR 9-85 for Pacific Realty Association (PACTRUST). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and File. 2. Motion to remove from Consent Agenda - Motion to call up for review at a later meeting. Council SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. lOOOP/dmj t CITY OF TIGARO NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 9-85 APPLICATION: Request by Pacific Realty Association (Pac Trust) to construct two office/warehouse buildings totaling 69,397 square feet and related facilities on property zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and I-L (Light Industrial) and located on the south corner of Upper Boones Ferry Road and Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 13AB, TL 1200, 1300. 1400) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A FINDING OF FACT 1. Background In August, 1984, the City approved an expansion of the existing Pac Trust Business Center, the extension of Durham Road, and the adjustment of the configuration of the parcels on either side of the new street (SDR 15-84). 2. Vicinity Information The properties on the opposite side of_Upper Boones Ferry Road are within the City of Durham and are zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and R-10 '(Single Family Residential). The property to the south is also within the City of Durham with an O-P (Office Park) zone designation. All other surrounding parcels within the Tigard City limits and are zoned I-P and I-L, 3, ` Site Information and Proposal Description The property is presently undeveloped. The Durham Road extension is close to completion and acceptance by the City. The applicant proposed to construct two office/warehouse buildings of 48,035 and 21,362 square feet. The buildings design will be similar -to -the existing ' development. Two sixty-foot wide driveways will be utilized for access to Durham Road and a 50-foot wide driveway is intended for access to Upper Boones Ferry Road. 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. A bicycle lane should be provided along the Upper Boones Ferry Road frontage as called for in the Tigard Area Pedestrian/Bike Path Plan: b, Washington County must sign the necessary_ documents to finalize the release of the access strip to the gravelpit situated immediately south of the subject property. 1 NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 9-85 - PAGE 1 C. The property is adjacent to the Rosewood/72nd Avenue Sanitary Sewer L.I.O. (Unified Sewerage Agency) and sewer assessments may be due upon development. d. Any remaining assessments related to the 72nd Avenue L.I.D. (No. 21) are due upon development. e. A State Highway Division permit will be required for the necessary street improvements on the Upper Boones Ferry Road frontage. f The sanitary and storm sewer lines within the Upper Boones Ferry Road right-of-way need to be extended to he south boundary of the property. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal, but it is recommended that a sign location be approved. The City of Durham has no objection to the request provided a sidewalk is extended along the Upper Boones Ferry Road frontage. No other comments have been received. 8 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION The proposeddevelopment is consistent with Community Development Code requirements regarding building height, setbacks, access, parking _ (approximately 160 spaces required, depending upon occupancy), landscaping, and lot coverage. Minor modifications are required to bring the proposal into complete conformance with the Code. Parking Thi sidewalk access for the three of the five handicapped parking spaces must be revised to eliminate the use of steps and to include sidewalks adjacent to the three parking spaces. The site plan does not indicate any bicycle parking areas. The Code requires one secure bicycle rack space for every 15 required parking spaces. The site plan should be amended to include bicycle parking space. i Visual Clearance Chapter 102 of the Code requires that a 30--foot triangular area on either side of a driveway must remain clear of obstructions that exceed three feet in height. Also. Chapter 100 states that landscaping should not be allowed to obscure vision for motorists. In order to conform with the Code, the landscaping plan must be modified in the vicinity of the two driveways on Durham Road. The Hogan cedar within 30 feet of the driveways should be eliminated or moved to another' location. - Due to sight distance limitations, the four Hogan cedars, two Sunset maples, and Thundercloud Plum should be removed from the north side of the 'southern driveway. Landscaping material in this area should not exceed three feet in height. "'NOTICE OF DECISION - 'SDR 9'-85 - PAGE 2 C. DECISION The Planning- Director approves SOR 9-85 subject to the following conditions: 1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE ' MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. Standard half-street improvements' including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, sanitary and sewer ' drainage and utilities shall be installed along the S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road frontage. Said improvements along S.W. Boones Ferry Road shall be built to major collector street standards and conform to the alignment of ,existing adjacent. improvements. Approval shall be obtained from the State Highway Division. 3. Seven -'(7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 4. Sanitary sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the public improvement plans. 5. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after th Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement plans.. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of a street opening permit (SW Durham Road) and/or 'construction compliance agreement (SW Upper Boones Ferry Road)( shall occur prior to. or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS. 6. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the public along the SW Upper Boones Ferry road frontage to provide for installation of a full street section, utility strip and sidewalk at the angle point opposite SW Durham Woods Court to increase the right-of-way to 30 feet from design centerline. The description for said dedication hall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline as established by C.S. #20,596. The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED. 7. The ,basis of bearings for the Plat or Survey shall be CS #20,223, which is a part of the Tigard Field Survey Network. S. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director. approval which is consistent with Chapter-100 and 102 of ' the Community Development Code. NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 9-85 - PAGE 3 a;. 9. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval with the following_modifications: a. All handicapped parking spaces shall have appropriate sidewalk access to the building. b. A minimum of 10 bicycle rack spaces shall be provided. The location and design of the racks shall also be approved by the Director. 10. Ali applicable L.I.D. assessments shall be paid. 11. The Durham Road extension shall be accepted by the City and the lot line adjustment reflecting the new street alignment shall be recorded: 12. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant 6 owners X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION $HALL BE FINAL ON August 19, 1985, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P.M. X19/85 4. Questions: If you have any questions, p!A-&se call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397. Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639-4171. 4'0 � tar William A. rector of Community Development DATE APPROVED .: (KSL:pm/1707P) NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 9-85 -` PAGE 4 CITY OF TIGARD, ORLGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 8, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Notice of Final -Order-by Hearings Officer PREPARED BY: Community Development S1, 7-85 Page N. Stevens REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is the Notice of Final Order by Hearings Officer, No. SL 7-85 for Page N. Stevens, Stevens Marine/Mike Bartos for a request to allow landform alteration and development of a parking/outdoor storage area within the 100 year flood plain. Property is designated Central Business District. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Receive and File. 2. _ Motion to remove from Consent Agenda and call up for Council review at a later meeting. SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and File. i CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - BY HEARINGS OFFICER 1. Concerning Case Number(s): SL 7-85 2. Name of Owner: Page N. Stevens 3. Name of Applicant: Stevens Marine / Mike Bartos Address 9180 SW Burnham City Tigard State OR Zip 97223 4. Location of Property: Address 9180 SW Burnham Legal Description 2S1 2AC Lot 200 ! 5. Nature of Application: Request to allow landform alteration and develoyment of a parking/outdoor storage area within the 100 year floodplain. Property is- designated Central Business District 6. Action: Approval as requested XX Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant b owners XX Owners of record within the ."quired distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 9. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON August 1L1985LUNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. ftpeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 19.32.290(A) and Section 19.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4ts= P^ August 16. 1985 10. AuQstions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. 0257P BEFORE THE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON IN THE :TATTER OF THE APPLICATION � No. SL 7-85 FOR A SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT TO j ALLOW LANDFORM ALTERATION AND ) DEVELOPMENT OF A PARKING/OUTDOOR AREA WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD- PLAIN; ) Stevens Marine, Applicant. ) The above-entitled matter came before the Hearings Officer at the regularly scheduled meeting of July 25, 1985, at the Durham Waste Treatment Plant in Tigard, Oregon; and The applicant requests a sensitive lands permit to allow landform alteration and development of a parking/outdoor storage area within the 100 year floodplain of Fanno Creek; and The Hearings Officer conducted a public hearing on July 25, 1985, at which time testimony, evidence and the Planning Department Staff report were received; and The Hearings Officer adopts the findings of fact and conclusions contained in the Staff Report, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and incorporated by reference herein NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SL 7-85 is .', approved subject to the following conditions :Page1 - SL .7-85 I, Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be met prior to issuance of fill or grading permits. 2. Four (4) sets of plan-profile improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed pedestrian/bike path (grading only) grading and soil stabilization improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval. 3. Existing sanitary sewer plan-profile details shall be provided as part of the improvement plans. 4. Construction improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved improvement plans. The Section will require posting of a 100% Performance Bond and the payment of a permit' fee. Also, the execution of a construction-dedication compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved improvement plans. See the enclosed handout giving more specific information regarding fee schedules, bonding and agreements. 5. The area below the resulting 148 foot elevation shall be dedicated as Greenway to the City of Tigard. A monumented boundary survey showing all new title, lines prepared by a regsitered Professional Land Surveyor shall be submitted. 6. An as built drawing of all grading shall be submitted upon completion of work within the floodplain. 7. The necessary permits shall be obtained from the U.S. -Army .Corp of Engineers and Division of State Lands. Page 2, - SL 7-85. 8. If not exercised within one year from the approval date, this approval shall expire. DATED this �ay of July, 1985. HEARINGS 'OFF ICER APPROV ETH ST. -STEM Page. 3 - SL 7=85 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON f- COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY i AGENDA OF: August 19 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: + DATE SUBMITTED: August 6 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Planning Commission ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Barron Const./ a2proval 6/4/85 C- PREPARED S 6-85 PREPARED BY: Keith Liden REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK. C � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 29, 1985, the Council denied the appeal of Barron Construction requesting the deletion of a condition of approval for S 6-85 which required half street improvements along the Bonita Road frontage. A resolution has been prepared for signing. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Review and approve the resolution. (KSL:bs/1693P) CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 � . AGENDA ITEM #: _ DATE SUBMITTED: August 14, 1935 PREVIOUS ACTION: - Council approved event ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Report on on June 24 1985 Cruisin 185 PREPARED BY: Capt. Jennings, E Newton REQUESTED BY: City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK u'L CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a memo from Capt. Jennings and Elizabeth Newton summarizing Tigard Cruisin 185. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. (EAN:bs/1734P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: City Council August 14, 1985 l FROM: Captain Jennings b Elizabeth Newton SUBJECT: "Cruisin Tigard '85" CONFORMANCE TO REQUIREMENT: The Tigard Promotions, Inc. group should be commended for their cooperation in meeting all conditions set forth by Council approval of this event. Organizers of the Committee were very conscientious in checking with City staff as to the status of approvals and submitted all necessary informationand documents on time. A complete list of street vendors for the event was submitted to staff and was available for review prior to the event. Written guarantees for parking were submitted prior to the event. A plan showing locations for barricades was submitted to Capt. Jennings for his review prior to the event. PARADE: There were no problems associated with the parade. The parade went as planned creating no problems that were not anticipated with the closing of traffic lanes. Normal traffic flow resumed approximately one hour after the beginning of the parade. MAIN STREET CLOSURE: No problems were encountered as a result of the closure of Main Street. No problems were created for emergency vehicles. Traffic was adequately warned in advance of the closure with detour and no right turn signs. EVENING DANCE/BEER GARDEN: The Police Department received 18 noise complaints because of the volume of the music between 9:50 PM and 12:20 AM. Other than those complaints, there were no apparent problems created by the dance and beer garden. There was one family disturbance outside the gate but no crowd control problems were presented. In conclusion, we feel that through the cooperation of the Tigard Promotions Inc, the Tigard Police Department and Volunteers, "Cruisin Tigard '85'° was a very successful event. (EAN:bs/1734P) s Cot.y'4LCj Ma ; 1 xf A i Form 1090 .:._ aur y WASHINGTON COUNTY j9 Inter-Department Correspondence r r) Date August 7, 1985 To Washington County Transportation Coordination Committee —Technical Group From Brent Curtis T+"' subject • " CITY/COUNTY ROAD JURISDICTION Washington County has recently received requests from the cities of Beaverton, Tigard and Tualatin to transfer (from county to city) jurisdiction of road maintenance responsibility for certain streets and roads. Consistent with the direction recently given by the Board of County Commissioners, the Department of Land Use and Transportation has undertaken a process to define an appropriate "County Road System" to be established and maintained by the County. The product of this effort will be'a set of road jurisdiction and transfer procedure policies to be presented for Board consideration at their September 17th meeting. These poiicies,if adopted will be used at the Board's public hearing on transfer requests scheduled for October 1st. This issue will be a topic of discussion at your next W.C.T.C.C. Technical Group meeting on September 5th. It is our intent to have a draft policy paper for your review and comment prior to that meeting. If you have any immediate comments, please contact Rod Sandoz at 640-3517. BC:RS:db k qq (k CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ' AGENDA OF: August 12, 1985 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N.A. ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Personnel Policies 6 Procedures Manual PREPARED BY: D. Hartig �.� Amendment REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK* CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The _current personnel rules regarding layoff do not provide any limitation on layoff status. The 'proposed amendment provides: 1. An employee retain layoff status for one year (12 months). 2. A terminated employee who is recalled by the City and rejects the assignment shall relinquish his layoff status. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 Reject the proposed amendment. 2. Change the amendment. 3. Adopt amendment as proposed. W SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt Resolution No. 85— Q amending the Personnel Manual Section 6.12.(x) Layoff. 4= (DH:bs/1006F) X CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 14, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Discussion by Council ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: O'Mara/Frewing at July 22, 1985 Meeting Traffic Count PREPARED BY: William A. Monahan REQUESTED BY: City Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: (NAM CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY At the July 22, 1985 City Council meeting, the City Council requested that staff place traffic counters at the intersection of SW O'Mara and Frewing. Attached are the results of the traffic counts and a mems from staff with a recommendation. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Review the attached traffic count results and consider staff's recommendation. s (EAN:bs/1735P) MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO Members of the City Council August 14,-1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development b, SUBJECT: O'Mara/Frewing Attached is a traffic count prepared by the Operations Division for the O'Mara Frewing Intersection. As you will see, traffic is fairly heavy in all three directions during a 24-hour period. O'Mara street is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as a minor collector, while Frewing is a local street. The traffic volumes found by our study fall within the standards presented in our plan, therefore, no adjustment is needed to the plan. The staff suggests than the Council consider whether or not to install two stop signs at the Frewing intersection as existed in the past. Restoring these signs would restrict the - collector traffic, however, given the safety issues raised, this solution could be the best given the circumstances. WAM:lw/1731P ,r M E M O R A N D U M C■ ■ 7 ®F i[IFARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON TO: Bill Monahan FROM Jerry McNurlin - SUBJECT: Traffic Count for O'Mara and Frewing DATE: August 2 , 1985 O'Mara 766 Count 1074 Count c as � a o V4 U 3 d � to M R. h Total Count per Street ; _ O'Mara 1 ,840 vehicles Frewing 735 vehicles Total for Intersection : 2 ,575 in a 24 hour period. This count was taken mid-week from 3:00 P.M. to 3 : 00 P.M. CC: Jerry McNurlin File JM/tb 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON- COUNCIL AGENDA . TEM SUMMARY f AGENDA OF: August 12, 1985 AGF ,, ITEM #: ! a I DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION June 24, 85, CC a for MLP 8-85 request roved �. ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Refundg � partial refund p_p from Jacobs for M 5-85 (Lot Line PREPARED BY: Keith Liden Adjustment) REQUESTED BY: Mr. & Mrs. Jacobs DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: l !J't" CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY ; On June 14, 1985, the Planning Director approved a Minor Land Partition (MLP 8-85) to divide a property located between Tigard and North Dakota Streets. Since the partial extension of 108th Avenue was required, the applicant indicated that the partition proposal would not be finalized and a Lot tine " Adjustment was proposed instead (M 5-85). On June 24, 1985, the City Council approved a partial refund ($120.) of the application fee, The Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the Director on July 18, 1985. The applicant has decided not to pursue this option either even though the 108th Avenue extension was not a condition of approval. A refund of the $220 Lot Line Adjustment fee is requested. The applicant's letter and the reimbursement request are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Grant a full or partial refund. 2. Deny the request. :>3 SUGGESTED ACTION Deny the refund request. 1670P dm' �r I,, .. !ter_. • • . I rns • ' i 1 I J (,.;fly Of MAW EXPENDITURE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST A This form is a multi-use form. Where appropriate receipts must be attached. Documentation is important ,for all purposes. Staple documentation to form. VENDOR NO: DATE: June 27, 1985 PAYABLE TO: Joseph & Glenda Jacobs Requested by: Planning r ris�sa:soaaaassssssas:asssassaaas:sscasaassasasssaaassasssasaaaaaaxasasaasaznaa MISCELLANEOUS (parking, books, subscriptions, dues, memberships, etc.) : Date Description Account No. Amount 6/27/ 5 Refund on MLP 8-85 e2r CC 5/24/85 10-00000-440 120.00 Wawa mamma= GENERAL MEAL EXPENSE: Date Descri tion Amount t Account Number to be charged: Total szassaassssssasasassssaaassssssssssasaaasassasasaassassaas�asasaszasassas=ssaaa MILEAGE: Date Description: (Include end/start readings and total miles) Amount Account Number: Total miles x .20 Q ti asassssasassssssssasssssssssa sasssssssssssaaasaaaasaaassaaa:aaasaaas s=as=s ass APPROPRIATION BALANCE: 1%�' AS OF: Signature- APPROVALS ,(if $25.00 or unde bp�reim red through petty cash): (up to s500.00)Section Manage _'*Parah. ,Agent. (3500.01-$5,000 00)Dept. Head/Purch. 'Agent CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19. 1985 AGENDA ITEM#: )SA DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Tigard Street 1_ (Mull) Street Vacation Resolution PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson' (TLREQUESTED BY: Randy Clarno DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � CITY ADMINISTRATOR: -- POLICY ISSUE Council initiation of Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Gregory Mull was required to dedicate10' along SW Tigard Street as a condition of development. This dedication was accepted by Council 10/15/85. Upon further research, staff discovered 20' was actually described in the legal description. Engineering staff has requested a Council initiated vacation to return 10 feet of this property to Mr. Mull, ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolution setting public hearing for 9/23/85. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate #1 is recommended by staff. Motion to: approve Resolution No. 85-61 and call for public hearing on September 23, 1985. f lw/3098A NOTICE OF SW TIGARD STREET VACATION The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 23, 1985. at 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior Nigh School Lecture Room. 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of a 10` strip of SW Tigard Street right-of--way at 9738 SW Tigard Street in the City of Tigard. The request was initiated by the City Council on August 19, 1985 at the request of -City: staff, Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said lands. Any written objections or remonstrance shall be filed with the City Recorder by September 18, 1985 at 3:00 PM. TT Publish August 22, 29, & September 5, 12, 19, 1985 S,.r ��rrrnnn _ -lw/3073A CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19. 1985 - AGENDA ITEM ##: � DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW Walnut Place/99W Street Vacation PREPARED BY: LoreWilson Resolution REQUESTED BY: Bob Hudson DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council initiation of Street Vacation request —consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION_SUMMARY Mr. Bob Hudson requested vacation of the corner property on SW Walnut Place and 99W. On 1/14/85, Council voted to initiate vacation of this property. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1, Approve attached resolution setting public hearing for 9/23/85. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate 01 is recommended by staff. Motion to. approve Resolution No. 85-62 and call for public hearing on September 23, 1985. lw/3098A NOTICE OF SW WALNUT PLACE VACATION t The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 23, at Fowler Junior High School d a Lecture of lb65 SW strip of Walnut 1985, at 7:30 P.M. SW Street, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposethe City Walnut Place right-of--way located onth corner the C ty Council onPacific hway in August 19, 1985 e of Tigard. The request was z ear and be heard at the request of Bob Hudson. Any interested person may app for or against the prposedall beo filed�withacatlthe City Recorder byon of said lands. September objections 18 C 1985 at remonstrance sh 3:00 'PM. TT Publish August 22, 29, & September 5, 12, 19, 1985 f: 1w/3073A .z ,x x CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ^� l 19 August 198,5_ AGENDA OF: - AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12� 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A te ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW 74th Avenue 'on PREPARED` BY: Loreen Wilson- (near Cherry Street) Street Vacate Resolution REQUESTED BY: Gar Fox DEPARTMENT NEAO OK* CITY ADMINISTRATOR; POLICY ISSUE Council initiation of Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Gary Fox, of Western International Properties, has requested vacation of a -of-way which is no longer needed for public use since portion of public right it is at the end of a dead-end street. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Reprove attached resolution setting public hearing for 9/23/85. 2. Taste no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate #1 is recommended by staff. Motion to: approve Resolution No. 85-63 and call for public hearing on September 23, 1985. lw/3098A r NOTICE OF SW'74TH AVENUE VACATION xt The Tigard 'City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 23, 1985, :at 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of a strip of SW 74th Avenue right—of-way located near SW Cherry Street in the City of Tigard. The request was initiated by the City Council on August 19, 1985 at the request of Mr. Alan Fox, of Western International Properties Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said lands. Any =' written objections or remonstrance shall be filed; with the City Recorder- by September 18, 1985 at 3:00 PM. Tr Publish August 22, 29, & September 5, 12, 19, 1985 z las13073A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 14. 1985 AGENDAITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: '` August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGEUDA TITLE: SW 122nd__ Avenue (near Greenway Town Center) PREPARED BY Loreen Wilson Street Vacation Resolution REQUESTED BY: Robert G. Johnson DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ✓ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council initiation of Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adoptee! by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Robert G. Johnson, of Great Northwest Management Company, has requested vacation of a portion of public right—of-way which is no longer needed for public use since additional development has taken place in the area. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolution setting public hearing for 9/23/85. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate #1 is recommended by staff. Motion to: approve Resolution No, 85-64 and call for public hearing on September 23, 1985. lw/3098A l NOTICE OF SW 122ND AVENUE VACATION The Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 23, 1985, at 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of a portion of 40 footwide SW 122nd Avenue right-of-way located near Greenway Town Center in the City of Tigard. The request was initiated by the City Council on August 19, 1985 at the request of Mr. , Robert Johnson, of Great NW Management Company. Any -interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said lands, Any written objections or remonstrance shall be filed with the City Recorder by September 18, 1985 at 3:00 PM. TT Publish August 22, 29, & September 5, 12, 19, 1985 r t t lw/3073R CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 1 AGENDA OF: August 19. 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: SW 67the Ave. 6 `Clinton Streets (near I-5) Street PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson 1-1 Vacation Resolution REQUESTED BY: Jerry Cach DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: 1 CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE Council initiation of Street Vacation request - consistent with Council policy as adopted by Resolution No. 85-30. INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Jerry Cach, of Cash's Realty, has requested vacation of a portion of public right-of-way along 67th Avenue between Baylor Street and ODOT Access and Clinton Street from 67th Avenue to I-5 to enhance economic development in the area. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolution setting public hearing for 9/23/85. 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate #1 is recommended by staff. Motion to: approve Resolution No. 85-65 and call for public hearing on September 23, 1985. lw/3098A NOTICE OF SW 67TH & CLINTON STREET VACATION The Tigard City Council will hold 'a public hearing on Monday, September 23, 1985, at 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon to consider the proposed vacation of a 60 foot wide portion of SW 67th Avenue and Clinton Street near I-5 in the City of Tigard. The request was initiated by the City Council on August 19, 1985 at , the request of Mr. Jerry Cach, Cach's Realty. Any interested person may appear and be heard for or against the proposed vacation of said lands. Any written objections or remonstrance shall be filed with the City Recorder by September 18, 1985 at 3:00 PM. TT Publish August 22, 29, & September 5, 12, 19, 1985 t. U.. lw/3073A CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY � AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: 8/7/85 PREVIOUS ACTION: Placed onto ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Accepting the Maintenance Se t. 24 1984 Public ImQrovements within PREPARED BY: Engineerina (RLT) LT Bond Park T Subdivision REQUESTED BY: Developer f � DEPARTMENT 14EAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE �i INFORMATION SUMMARY Project was placed onto maintenance Sept. 24, 1984 with 7 conditions All conditions have now been met. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ` SUGGESTED AgTION Engineering recommends that City Council accept the Public, improvements within ;. Bond Park T Subdivision and have the City assume full maintenance .; responsibility. ;ZP�1702P) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1995 PREVIOUS ACTION: Acceptance of Street ISSUEfAGENDA TITLE: Acceptance of and Sewer Compliance Agreement. 5 8 J Builders, Str. Did. and PREPARED. BY: Randy S. Clarno Acceptance of Perm. San. Sewer _ REQUESTED BY: Engineering Easement. "arm DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ,.'14.'`a i CITY ADMINISTRATOR --- POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY S S J Builders are the developers of the Meadow Creek Apartments west of SW 121st and south of Scholls Ferry Road. This street dedication and sewer easement were conditions of development. Attached are the appropriate documents. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Engineering recommends_ that Council accept this Street Dedication and Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement. (RSC:czl17O9P) -Z INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP t STREET DEDICATION KNOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that S & J. Builders Ltd., a artnersh' do hereby dedicate to the Public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road and_utility cribed real property purposes on, over.' across, under, along and within the following des in Washington County. Oregon: Exhibit "A" attached hereto To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public forever for the uses and purposes hereinaboye stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the-owners) in fee simple and the property is free of all 'liens and encumbrances, they have good and -legal right to grant the rights above—described. and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the"property. E The amount paid for this dedication is 3 1.00 e IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the grantor(s) has (have) hereunto 'met' his (her) (their) hand(s) and al(s) this day of , 19 (SEAL) PartnerVS J uildere Ltd. (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGO ) GOiJNIY OF WASHINGTON) �Yc Personally appeared the above named 40_&66&T &.,7j>h- Jse4l + Partner, � S & J Builders,Ltd. who executed this instrument and each of them acknowledged to me that, th s instrument was executed voluntarily and freely. Not r! y Public for Oregon Hy Commission expires ACCEPTANCE S �L Approved as to form this C day of ( , By$ Cit)yAttars y - y a T gard Approved as to legal description thisG��day of , 19 By: C r- - City of Tigard SU �vY Accepted by the City Council this ��day of + 19�,• ITY IL CITY 0i T CARD. OREGON By. y Recorder - City of Tigard (1706A) (7-84) x EXHIBIT "A.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Meadow Creek Access € Project No. 136-005 ¢ 3 F A tract of land situated in the N.W. 1/4, Section 34, T.1S. , R1W., W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington county, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: 3 Commencing at a point on the centerline of S.W. 122nd Ave., said point also dieing the Southeast corner of that tract of land conveyed to Portland Fixture Co., recorded in Fee No. 78-09703, Washington County deed records; thence, South 0°05142" East, along the said centerline of S.W. 122nd Ave. , 7.38 feet to the point of beginning; thence, South 89052127" West, 32.01 feet; thence, along the arc of a 25.00 radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 220032137" (chord bears South 20'23152" East, 46.90 feet) an arc length of 96.23 feet; thence, North 89052127" East, 15.74 feet to a point of the said centerline of S.W. 122nd Ave. thence North 0005142" West, along the said centerline of S.W. 122nd Ave., 44.00 feet to the point of beginning. s F Y Q A. V lY LL tu �- o o � •��v ��.;—z i� •rte- s s b 4 E 1�i LA W -A _ �Q� I h n I «r ` INDIVIDUAL-GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT s �I �•��- ��', y hereinafter called the Grantors, in consideration for the) from them of �Cit of # dollars (t �' l Tigard, hereinafter called Grantee, grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual 'easement for constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, ? inspecting and=repairing of an underground sewer line' and appurtenatogether with the right to remove, as necessary, vegetation, foliage, .trees g and other obstructions on the following described parcel of land, situated in g the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon: t€ SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right,' f title or interestexcept those expressly ' stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, 1 successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the_rlghtef oof the -Grantee Intheabove-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE An TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the granto.(s) has (have) hereunto set g per) (their) d(a) and ,as'I this ,_day of �4,t®G� --' (SEAL) (SEAL) rtnet S b J Builders 1 SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) I µ� BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 8— day of *larch 19 -' before me, the undersigned NotaryPublicin and for the State of Oregon, personally appeared the within-named Robert G. Johnson S f: J Builders, Ltd. who is are nown to me to e t e ideatica individuals -des cri d aad who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he (she) (they) executed the same freely and voluntarily. -i IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 8th day of clarch _, 1485 Agot. y Pu is o�®r.Z.n�� (NOTARIAL SEAL) My Commission Expires: 11-7-86 rL � an'to fora this ��_ Gay ofi.1tttiley : By: �- y - City of Tigard Approved as to legal description this leE��day of ._+ 195' By: C.ity a Tigazd �� Save Y Approved this day of 14$x. CITY C I ITY OFf GARD. OREGON •C ty Recorder City of Tigard Meadow Creek Sanitary Sewer Easement EXHIBIT "A" Project Number 136-005 March 20, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A 15.00 foot wide strip of land, situated in the N.W. _1/4 Section 34, T.1S9 , R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, _Washington County, Oregonbeing more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Bethany Associates, Ltd, and recorded in Fee Number 84-42199, Washington County Deed Records; thence, South 890521270 West, along the said South dine of _Bethany, Associates, Ltd, tract 398.41 feet to the true point of beginnings thence, South 0010048" East, 522.21 feet; thence, North 27000116" West, 33.24 feet; thence, North 0010148' West, 492.56 feet to a point on the South line of said Bethany Associates, Ltd, trach 1 thence, North 89052127" East, along the South line of said Bethany Associates, Ltd, tract 15.00 feet to the point of beginning, l i I t yp.ry`.'.gYw +.nom+eM ,R^ wi^.:'M. :♦ � t: .}..,v i.s:X" i �Y N 00.523 8+ I I'`'mo _ gE GCl2• �4".}�19g 73 I. � .L cid• ,�� It 1.t2 oT �� if y�.,` ELIH e1 f 1 E 21G YI a rt 1 C 210 6 1.4 \� r;-MY`�V Eli -A \ •. ♦ �� \ tJO. Ooi) ApiG v \. G IE L1o� 2`6� � \\ ��\ O d 1 w•c 4 1 M V � Lill, .l Hrt7-1 E �PnLd�•- tE LS m ' �� 16 LI Go (CIH 2MZ IV.?J)a t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON_ COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Au ust 19 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: Consent DATE SUBMITTED: August 13 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Planning Commission Resolution regarding PREPARED BY: Commissioner Fvre SW 135th REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: //�` CITY ADMINISTRATOR: �,� POLICY ISSUE m INFORMATION SUMMARY At the August 6, 1985, Planning Commission meeting, the Commissioners reviewed the attached resolution outlining the Commission's position on approving development proposals in the area of SW 135th Avenue. The Commission voted unanimously to forward the resolution to the City Council, State Highway Division, Washington County, and the City of Beaverton. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes are attached. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Receive and File SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and File s 1727P/dmj RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, IN RECOGNITION OF THE EVER-INCREASING TRAFFIC PROBLEM ASSOCIATED WITH THE INTERSECTIONS OF 135TH AND OLD SCHOLLS FERRY AND NEW SCROLLS FERRY ROADS, REQUEST IMMEDIATE ACTION (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) BE INITIATED BY THE APPROPRIATE CITY BODIES TO MITIGATE THIS PROBLEM SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, CONTINUE TO APPROVE AREA DEVELOPMENTS WHICH INCREASE TRAFFIC FLOWS AT THESE DANGEROUS INTERSECTIONS. WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission, the Tigard Transportation Committee, the citizens living nearby, and others, commonly recognize the dangerous nature of these intersections; and WHEREAS, approval by the Tigard Planning Commission of developments in the adjoining areas contribute to the seriousness of this situation; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation has funds readily available to correct this situation, given a perman3nt alignment is agreed upon, and; WHEREAS, the permanent alignment is the responsibility of, and may be determined by, the cities of Tigard and Beaverton NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard Planning Commission that unless convinced that significant progress has been made to mitigate the serious traffic situation present at 135th and Old and New Scholls all developments coming before the Planning Commission will be deliberated as normal, however, those contributing to the aforementioned traffic problem will be given extra scrutiny and perhaps denied and forwared to the City Council if the Planning Commission determines that in good conscience it cannot approve developments that further increase the traffic flows at these intersections. The Beaverton Planning Commission is hereby encouraged to adopt a similar resolution and/or otherwise promote expeditious resolution of this problem. PASSED: This i�- day of�, 1955. President - Tigard Planning Commission 1942e TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 6, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at the Tigard School District Building - Conference Room - 13137 SW Pacific Highway. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Peterson, Fyre, Bergmann, Vanderwood. Absent: Commissioners Campbell and Leverett. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES o Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to adopt the minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o There was no communication. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9--85 and ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 11-85 Request to annex 23.26 acres into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Washington County Residential 24 units per acre to City of Tigard Medium High density and the zoning from Washington County Residential 24 units/acre to City of Tigard R-25. Located: SW 135th and north of Scholls Ferry Road, NPO # 7. Senior Planner Newton reviewed the staff report and explained that staff had received additional requests from adjoining property owners. through Ryan O'Brien, to be included with this annexation. Discussion followed. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Russell Krueger, 3515 SW Barbur Blvd. Y-1, Portland. 97201, stated that with the annexation of his property it would make it easier for the extension of Murray Blvd. and that there would be half street improvements constructed along the edge of his property line. Ryan O'Brien, 1134 SE 23rd Ave., Hillsboro, OR 97123, showed a map indicating Krueger's property and other properties interested in annexing to the City of Tigard. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Gail Stover, Rt. 1 Box 381, Beaverton, OR 97007, opposed the annexation. She did not -feel that the City of Tigard should extend its ;City limits beyond Scholls Ferry. Rd. She felt annexation to City of Beaverton would be more appropriate because they are in the PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUTES August 6. 1985 Page 1 o Lengthy discussion followed regarding 18.136 Annexations. Consensus ` of the Commission was to have the request forcommentssent to all Planning Commissioners and that the Commission should have the t ability to call the annexation up for review. o Discussion followed regarding 18.142 Home Occupations. Commissioners voted 4 to 3 to delete (b) (1), which would require a non conforming Nome Occupation to come into conformance within five years. o Discussion followed regarding -18.114 Signs. Commissioners voted 5 to 2 to limit directional signs to 4 sq. ft. and not allow copy or logos on the directional signs. o Discussion followed regarding 18.106 Parking and Loading. Consensus of the Commission was not to allow a gravel surface for storage areas for recreation vehicles, non-operating vehicles, and fleet vehicles. Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Bergmann seconded to forward ZOA 4-85 to City Council recommending approval with the Commission's modifications. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS o The Commission reviewed the resolution prepared by Commissioner Fyre. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Vandenwood seconded to adopt the resolution as prepared and to forward a copy to the State Highway Division, Washington County, City of Beaverton, and the Tigard City ° i Council. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. o Discussion regarding NPO # 2 no longer having any members. * Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to recommend to City Council that NPO H 2 be permanently dissolved and incorporated into NPO's 7. 1, and 3. Motion carried by majority vote, Commissioner Bergmann voting no. 7. Meeting adjourned 10:05 P.M. Diane M. Geld s. Secretary ATTEST: A. Donald Moen, President 1703P dmj PLANNING C"ISSION_MINUTES August 6, 1985 Page 4 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: 4/22/85 Council Accept ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Anton Park Project Agrmnt & Bond; July 15, 1985 Council allowed a partial Bond reduction (Phase I) Subdivision-Authorize PREPARED BY: John Hagman rs Partial Release of Performance Money REQUESTED BY: Development Services DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Anton Park Subdivision is located on the west side of SW 121st Avenue opposite SW North Dakota Street. 2. The subdivision's Compliance Agreement and Letter of Commitment (Performance Bond) provide for the City to Authorize disbursement of assurance monies when units of work are satisfactorily completed, provided a minimum of 20% of the assurance monies are "held back" for the one year guarantee obligation. 3. Completion of certain public facility items has continued to progress satisfactorily; note Exhibit "A" & Exhibit "B"attached hereto. A. Subsequently, the developer has requested that Council authorize a further release of funds. 5. Staff recommends that the Council approve the request. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize Mayor and City Recorder to execute a letter to provide for another release of Commitment monies, in the sum of $100,260.68, and pass the Resolution titled "Resolution to Authorize Release of Commitment Funds for Anton Park Subdivision" to document same. C1TY0F i 11VA August 2, 1985 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON Reference: Anton Park Subdivision (Letter of Commitment Partial Release) Gentlemen: In the matter of the three hundredseventytwo thousand, three hundred—six dollars ($372,306.00), Letter of Commitment, ' between Washington Federal Savings Bank,_ and the City of Tigard, Oregon and Custom Homes by _Dave, Inc. this is to serve as official notice to allow said Washington Federal Savings Bank to release to Custom Homes by Dave, Inc. a portion of the deposit entrusted to said bank having already been authorized to release one hundred eight thousand dollars and eighty-one cents, ($108,000.81). We again authorize to be released one hundred thousand, two hundred and sixty / dollars and sixty--eight cents, ($100,260.68). The amount to remain entrusted to Washington Federal Savings Bank as a performance bond to assure the City that all remaining requirements of said subdivision are completed, shall be one hundred sixty four thousand, forty—four dollars and fifty—one cents, ($164,044.51). This notice shall not be construed to nullify or alter the terms of the aforesaid Letter of Commitment in any way; it is merely an authorization to release a portion of the entrusted monies. City of Tigard, Oregon By: Mayor By City Recorder (1688P) PH:539-4171 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM ##: �. DATE SUBMITTED:. August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Mallard Lakes Subdivision Comp1, Aqrmnt. S Perform PREPARED BY: Development Services Dept Bond•Author. Mayor 6 Recorder to exc REQUESTED BY: John Hagman DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: %�<</f�~ CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1, The proposed "Mallard Lakes" subdivision is located north of SW Sattler Road and between 92nd Avenue and Hall Blvd. The preliminary plat has been approved by the City, 2. The attached Subdivision Compliance Agreement and Subdivision Performance Bond has been submitted by the developer, as is required by the City, to assure completion of installation of all public facilities within the proposed subdivision. 9. Construction plans are ready to be issued and all required public improvement fee's have been paid. Issuance of said plans is pending Council action (as is suggested below). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to execute the Subdivision Compliance Agreement for Mallard Lakes in behalf of the City; and, also, accept the Subdivision Performance Bond therefor. (JH:bs/1721P) SUBDIVISION COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT dated the 1`1 day of v«.gas , 198-5 between the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipality of Oregon, hereinafter, termed the. "CITY". and WARD-WFSj-CDIT.STRiTf.'TTnN INC hereinafter termed "Petitioner". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, Petitioner has applied to the City for approval for filing in Washing on County,- a subdiv Sion plat kno as Se;� o�� illamette Meridiatf, Washington County. Oregon; and WHEREAS, the City has approved and adopted the standard specifications for Public Works construction by APWA Oregon Chapter and the Unified Sewerage specifications for the sanitary sewers prepared by professional engineers for subdivision development; and WHEREAS, the public improvements required to be constructed or placed in Petitioner's development are incomplete. but Petitioner has none%heless requested the City to permit progressive occupancy and use of property in.the subdivision, and the parties desire hereby to protect the public interest generally and prospective purchasers of lots in said subdivision by legally enforceable assurances that the public improvements will be installed as required and completed within the time hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the Petitioner and its sureties, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (1) Petitioner shall proceed with the development, with the intent and purpose to complete all public improvements except sidewalks and street trees of said subdivision not later than two (2) years from the date of this agreement, and Petitioner is hereby bound to comply with all subdivision standards as set forth in said Subdivision Ordinance and the standard specification adopted by the City of tigard. or as may be otherwise approved by the Public Works Department and to use only such material and to follow such designs as may be required to conform thereto. Petitioner shall provide certification of installation conformance, via a registered civil engineer, to the City prior to City inspection of petitioners improvement work for City tentative and final acceptance consideration. (2) To assure compliance with the City's requirements and the provisions hereof. Petitioner tenders herewith to the City a surety bond in form approved by the City, with liability in the amount of # 24'7 Z0S-M a copy whereof hereto attached by this reference made a part hereof. (3) In the event that Petitioner shall fail, neglect or refuse to proceed with the work in an orderly and progressive manner to assure completion within the time limits, upon ten (10) days notice by the City to petitioner and Petitioner's sureties, and such default and failure to proceed continuing thereafter, the City may at its option proceed to have the work competed and y 1 ' charge the costs hereof against Petitioner and Petitioner's sureties and in the event same be not paid, to bring an action on the said bond to recover the amount thereof. In the event such action be brought, Petitioner and ' Petitioner's "sureties- promise and agree to pay, in addition to the amounts accruing and allowable, such sum as the court shall adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees and costs incurred by the City, both in the. Trial Court and Appellate Court, if any, or the City may, at its option, bring proceedings to enforce against the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's sureties specific ' performance of the contract and compliance with the subdivision standards and ordinances of the City of Tigard, and in such event, in like manner, the City shall be 'entitled to recover such sum as the court shall adjudge reasonable as and for the City's attorney's fees and costs, both in the Trial Court and Appellate Court, if any. (4) Petitioner, concurrent the with execution hereof, has deposited with the City an amount estimated to equal rental and maintenance fees with respect to the street ' lighting facilities within the subdivision, according to Portland General Electric Schedule 1191, Option "B"; together with a further sum equal to the estimated cost of providing electrical energy to energize the street bighting facilities for a period of two (2) years from the date of initial energizing of said lights. Said amount being $ l OS t .so (5) The City agrees to make and provide periodic and final- inspections which in the City's interest are desirable to assure compliance herewith, in ( consideration whereof the Petitioner has paid prescribed inspections fees.* ` (6) The City agrees to install street identification and traffic signs within the said subdivision, in consideration of payment in the amount of $ lag. 00 (7) At such time as all public improvements except sidewalks and street trees within the subdivision have been completed in accordance with the City's requirements, Petitioner shall submit a "certificate of installation conformance to the City to notify the City of the readiness for acceptance consideration inspection and upon notification by the Department of Public Works that the requirements of the City have been met, the Petitioner will submit to the City a good and sufficient maintenance bond if not already provided with the performance bond, form approved by the City, in the sum of $ 4ct yA41 ,Oro to provide for correction of any defective work or maintenance becoming apparent or arising within one (1) year after tentative acceptance of the public improvements by the City. Upon receipt of certification by the Department of Public Works, that all requirements have been met, and a_One YearMaintenanceBond, the City Council agrees to tentatively accept the public improvement subject' to the requirements for correction of deficiencies and maintenance for a period of one year as hereinabove set forth. (8) That in addition to or. supplementary of the requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the provisions hereof, Petitioner binds �• itself to conform to the following requirements, scheduling and limitations: *Project Fee $ -790% .9� Sewer Fee $ 1 9� 79 2 z t (a) None of the lotsof Petitioner's subdivision as described may be occupied for residential purposes until an occupancy permit is issued under authority of the City and no occupancy permit shall be issued prior to the acceptance of the subdivision and to the time that the sidewalk paralleling the street for each developed lot proposed to a occupied, is installed as a part of the development; provided that alil sidewalks as required by the plans and subdivision code shall be installed throughout said subdivision not later than 3 years from the date of this Subdivision Improvement Contract. (b) All landscaping trees on than portion of each lot between the z public sidewalks and the curb (parking area) is required, shall be planted in place prior to final inspection and issuance of occupancy permit for each such lot in the subdivision. Provided that final inspection and applicant for occupancy permit occurs within any calendar month from October to April of any F` year, , such' plantings may be deferred until the next following growing season. In any event, all landscaping and trees in all areas shall be planted and in place within the entire subdivision within three (3) years from the date of this subdivision improvement contract. s (c) After tentative City acceptance of the public improvements, the Petitioner agrees to place a *00j"MM asphaltic concrete Class "&' overlay on all roads within the development; placement scheduling to be approve by the City. (d) Compliance with all terms and provisions specified theretofor said subdivision development by the Council and the Planning Commission of the ( City of Tigard, Oregon, in regard to variances allowed from the subdivision ` ordinance, conditions specified by the zone use classification and, also, on the approved plat(s) and plan(s). S (e) Petitioner agrees to provide for correction of any defective work and/or maintenance becoming apparent or arising during the guarantee y period as hereinabove set forth. (9) At such time as all public improvements have been completed in accordance with the City's requirements, Petitioner shall notify the City of the readiness for final inspection and upon certification by the Department of Public Works that all requirements of the City have been met, the Council agrees to accept said improvements for operation and maintenance responsibility, thereinregard, and release the Petitioner's guarantee bond. l (10) The parties hereto hereby adopt the form of performance bond, copy i whereof is hereto attached-arid by'ref&ence made a part hereof, and Petitioner f agrees to cause to have said bond executed and filed with the City concurrently with the execution of this agreement at or prior to the time this agreement is executed on behalf of the City: z I (11) The specific requirements of Paragraph 9 hereof shall for all purposes be included as a part of the obligation secured by the aforesaid performance bond and the City sha} 2 be entitled to recourse thereto in the event of default on the part of the Oetitioner with respect to any requirement thereof, s PF 3 x IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Petitioner acting by and through its duly authorized undersigned officers, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors has caused this agreement to be executed, and the City acting pursuant to resolution of its Council ado ted at a meeting thereof duly and regularly held on the _ day of -4� 19�5�� has caused this agreemer►t to be executed by Lts or .and Recorder. 14ARD-WEST CONSTRUCTION NC /By ' By: + TFC CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON A 9y y Recorder pM4ct�Notary Adknowledgement hereto} 1 € Return signed copy to: (0070S) 4 - IUTA PERFORMANCE BOND s i' Bond No. YT877-6267 d-IVest panstruction, Inc. 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Waras } Principal, and Industrial Indemity y 0 the Northwest , a to conduct a general surety business in the State corporation duly authorized } of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held bound unto the City of F Tigard,` Oregon, a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of $ *2$7,205.00* lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which we, as Principal, and as Surety, jointly and severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present, iNE CONDITICNu or TIIIS BOND ARD OBLIrATTON TS SUCH, that the Principals are _ �ete a�n3 ly(ZSAamnta at ciihrli c►i SJ CM nM TA ac Mall arra _7a1c� located in the City of Tigard, Oregon, and have entered into a Subdivision Compliance Agreement with respect to timely development and improvement thereof, a copy of said Agreement is attached - hereto, and by reference made a part hereof; and pal herein shall faithfully and truly observe NOW, THEREFORE, if the PrinciF' and comply with all terms ,of the Agreement and shall well and truly perform L; all matters and things undertaken to be performed under said Agreement and under all ordinances, regulations and conditions of the Obligee applicable to said development and improvement, and shall promptly make payments to all persons supplying labor or material for any of the work provided by said ► it any lien or claim to be filed or prosecutioned agreement, and shall not perm against the Obligee, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond, in addition to all other rights and remedies hereunder, the City, in the event it shall ad prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and for attorney's fees. IN WITNEcc WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this 30th day of July 19 85 I Ward-West Cbnstruction, Inc. Principal seal By seal W din, Pimsident seal BY: seal l (A true,copy of the Power of Attorney Industrial Indemnity CLp p _of the Nortweur ety 4. must be attached to the original of / _ this bond Attorney-in-Fact Dayonna viilliams (0927P) r Industrial Indemnity ofuer of Attornev No. 10 NlJ Anofn all men bg these presents: That INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST.a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington and having its principal office in the City of Seattle,State of Washington,does hereby make.constitute and , appoint-----_..,,.:---N...----------------BAYONKA WILLIAMS— its ILLIAM$---its true and lawful attorney-in-fact for it and in its name. place and stead to execute on its behalf as surety, bonds. undertakings, stipulations, consents and all contracts of suretyship and to attach its corporate seal to such obligations in favor of all obligees, provided that the liability of the Company as surety under this authority in no one instance shall exceed the sum of UNLIMITED--- and reserving to itself full power of substitution and revocation. This Power of Attorney is made and executed in accordance with the resolution adopted by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST on July 13,1983.reading as follows: "RESOLVED,that the Chairman of the Board or President or Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President or Vice President of the Company,in conjunction with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of this Company,or the Secretary's designee,be,and he hereby is,authorized to execute,acknowledge or verify Powers of Attorney qualifying attorneys-in-fact to act under such Powers of Attorney to execute on behalf of INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST bonds,undertakings,stipulations, consents and all contracts of suretyship and to attach the corporate seal thereto; "FURTHER RESOLVED, that the signatures of said officers so authorized by this Company may be printed facsimile, litho- graphed or otherwise reproduced.and that the facsimile signature of any person who shall have been such officer of this Company at 4 the time of such execution,acttnowledgment or verification may continue to be used for the purpose hereinabove stated and will be binding on this Company.notwithstanding the fact that he may have eeascd to be such officer at the time when such instruments shall be issued." In witness whereof, INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST has caused these presents to be signed and t [ its corporate scat to be affixed by its proper officers this 281:h day of November .1983 ty Cottl•Agry Attest: INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST AUG.tJR,tin o r SERML W& o .,�► Lawfence E.Mulryan,Secretary R.J.Derr,President t I. Lawrence E. Mulryan.Secretary of INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST, do hereby certify that I have compared the Power of Attorney granted herein and the resolution recited herein with the originals now on file in the principal office of said Company,and that the same are correct transcripts therefrom and of the whole of the said originals,and that said Power of Attorney has not been revoked but is stili in full force and effect f In witness whereof. I have hereunto subscribed my none as such officer and affixed the seat of INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST this 30th day of July . 19851 r epi Co4lt';Mro E s lttMMRATE0 Atte is.'19I2,' o Lawrence E.Mulryan,Secretary VATTLL rill m s .' rr•s:e lariat �; a c g CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Council accepted the ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Shadow Hill II project Compl Agrmt on July 15, 1985 Subdivision Performance Bond PREPARED BY: Development Service Dept Authorize Mayor & Recorder to Accept REQUESTED BY: John Hagman DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The (proposed) "Shadow Hills II" subdivision is located west of Pacific Highway and north of Bull Mtn. Road. The preliminary plat has been approved by the City. 2. The attached Subdivision Performance Bond, in the form of a Letter of Commitment,' `has been submitted by the developer as is required by the - City to assure completion of the installation of all public facilities within the proposed subdivision. The Compliance Agreement for the project has already been accepted by the Council. 3. Construction plans have been issued and all required public improvement fee's have been paid. 4. The developer originally intended to construct all public improvements prior to recording of the final plat but, now, wishes to submit a performance guarantee bond to assure that all work will be done should he desire to have the plat recorded prior to final completion of the improvement work. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION `Authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to accept the Subdivision Performance Bond, in the form of a tetter of Commitment, for Shadow Hills II in behalf of thcCity. (JH:bs/1721P) ,r- LETTER OF COMMTT14FNT t (Performance Bond) We have received from ('oltimhi� ^ (lending institution) R^isi llrtc Rangy a loan commitment in the amount of $ 630,000.00 to finance the improvements of a subdivision located in the City of Tigard, said subdivision being commonly known as Shadow Hills II This loan commitment is specifically for con- struction purposes for: or $ of the aforsaid total commitment has been allocated for construction purposes for: (strike preceeding inapplicable part) public streets, including driveways, aprons, sidewalks, sewers 3) domestic water 4) under- lighting and curbs ) sanitary and storm ground telephone and power 4) gas 5)XXMXVdWXg. All such improvements are to be completed in conformity with City approved construction plans and the sub- division compliance agreement thereinregard. We have agreed that disbursements of the $ 81,4 3 5 dP be made in accord with the following schedule upon completion of each, or all, item(s), but not including the hold--back described below. ITEM AMOUNT Site Preparation/Grading 20,275.00 Concrete Curb 9 680.00 Street (base rock, leveling rock, base A.C.) 24 360.00 "l. Sanitary Sewer & appurtances • _ 41,596.00 Storm Sewer & appurtances 25.065.00 Water Line &' appurtances 19 .919.00 Gas Line & appurtances No Charge Underground Telephone & Electrical 3,000.00 _ Concrete Sidewalk & Driveway Aprons 22,000.00_ Asphalt (street overlay) R .640,00 Street Lighting 6 .900.00 Miscellaneous (pathways, landscaping, None mailbox clusters, etc.) We have entered into a "Subdivision Compliance Agreement" whereby we have agreed to install all improvements in accordance with 'the requirements of the City of Tigard and we are hereby authorizing you to hold the above-stated funds to pay them to us only when the following has been adhered to: That the City of Tigard has provided certification acknowledging completion of any or all work pursuant to the above itemized schedule of improvements. =" Pursuant to the above schedule, 20% cf the commitment funds (i.e., $36.287:.00) will,be held back through the normal one year guarantee period or until final City,Acceptance of 'the .project takes place or until the City is provided with i a separate maintenance bond, effective for said one year period from the date ' of Council, tentative acceptance of the work, to assure continued freedom from „_ defects, and maintenance, during the guarantee period., i � r Page 2 Letter of Commitment Concurrent with the final release of these funds, establishment proceedings will be instituted. It is understood and approved by all parties of concern to this letter of commitment that the City of Tigard shall have first claim and priority to the sum of $181 435.00 x less disbursements approved by the City of Tigard, in the event of any defect s failure(s) to correct such in the construction of the required improvements. It is further understood and agreed that the aforsaid priority of claim is paramount to all parties including the lending institution making the loan and that the lending institution has-covenanted and agreed that the sum_of $181.L435.100 less disbursements approved by the City of Tigard shall be held available to satisfy any aformentione4.cla m by the City'notwithstanding default on loatf.,by borrowing party or termination of loan by lending institution. DATE: � � Since ly yours, r' D nis L. Derby Approved and Accepted: C RAMC (Lending- Jttuti n) BY: j (Attach notary information and { signature(s) authority) PT.Jle ILAMK0 VICE PRESIDENT ACKNOWLEDO04 ENT-CORPORATION 1TATUTORN-COMMERCIA1.PRINTING CO. STATE OF WASHINGTON i County of Chelan }ss. On this t day of IUIy , 19-85 before me personally appeared P J Bilanko Vice -President --------- l 34of the and Columbia Federal Savings Bank the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary acts and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand a affixed my official seal the day and year first above wril (' Notary Public in and fo a State of Washington,residing l at Wanatr-hte in said County. my commission exprres..... �.,•-i v-.y u........ i rt: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 19 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Tech Center (Phase II) Sanitary Sewer Compl Agre PREPARED BY: Development Services Dept Authorize Mayor & Recorder to Executo REQUESTED BY: John Hagman �`�" in City's behalf. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: L�/' �'L CITY ADMINISTRATOR: POLICY ISSUE W INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. The proposed "Tech Center (Phase II) Sanitary Sewer Extention" is located North of Tech Center Drive and blest of 72nd Avenue. 2. The attached Sanitary Sewer Compliance Agreement has been submitted by the developer, as is required by the City, to assure satisfactory installation. 3. Construction plans are ready to be issued and the required public { improvement fee's have been paid. Issuance of said plans is pending Council action (as is suggested below). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to execute the Sanitary Sewer Compliance Agreement for Tech Center (Phase II) Sewer Extention in behalf of the City. (JH:bs/1721P) SANITARY SEWERCOMPLIANCE AGREEMENT �^' day of 19$—` THIS AGREEMENT dated this �o g hereinafter between the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipality of the tate of Ore on, termed the "City", and Western International Pro ties hereinafter termed "Petitioner". j W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Petitioner has .applied to the City for approval of_construction R SANITARY SEWER of a public mainline sanitary sewer, e g knwithin tas 'Thei Cbboundaries of an 'EXTEnI'PICi`1 (pH�LSE II� being area a on the attached Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof; and " ires applicants for construction of WHEREAS, the Cityof Tigard requ sanitary sewers, and appurtenances thereto, to snd testingandit fo construc i her, to provide an review, construction' inspection aubliceasements and to remit payment of performance assurances, to grant p relevant fees and charges; and WHEREAS, the City has approved and adopted the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction by ations Oregon osanitary rsewers vialtary Ordinance Sewerage No. rules, regulations ` and 'specific 84-58 and amendments thereto; and improvement required to be constructed by the WHEREAS, the public sewer petitioner has nonetheless herein requested petitioner is incomplete, but public, na ed City permit granting of easements to the puc, and the parties desire to protect the public interest and assure that the improvement will be e hereinafter set forth. installed as required and completed within the tim in consideration of the foregoing premise and the NOW, THEREFORE, erformed by the petitioner and covenants and agreements to be kept and p petitioners surety, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Petitioner shall proceed to complete all public improvements shown on the plan, approved and prepared improvement p ed by the City of Tigarevision dated 3-22"85 by s fates year from the date said improvement to be completed no later than one (1) y of this agreement and Petitioner hereby the citycomply t i ufsea onlysuch regulations and specifications set forth byy materials and to follow such designs as is required rovideto n certification Petitioner,_ via a registered civil theCitypriorshallto City inspection of of installation conformance, petitioners improvement work for initial City acceptance. 2. To assure compliance with the City's requirements and the provisions provide and tender to 'the City, a thereof, Petitioner agrees to obtain P with liability in an amount surety bond(s) in form approved by the City, prior to City issuance of a equal to the contract price of $ 12.737.00 of said permit or approved construction plans for construction onded, and improvements; Petitioner's contractor shall be licensed, `insured. 3. In the event" that tile petitioner shall fail, neglecC or refuse to proceed with the work in an orderly and progressiva manner to assure completion within the time specified, upon ten (10) days notice by the City to the such default and f Petitioner and the Petitioner's surety, and failure have proceed continuing thereafter, the City may at its option proceed to have the work completed and charge the costs thereof against the Petitioner and the Petitioner's surety and in the event the same be not paid, bring an action on said bond to recover the amount thereof. In the event that such action be brought, the Petitioner and the Petitioner's surety shall be required to promise and agree to pay, in addition to the amounts accruing and allowable, such sum as the court shall adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees and cost incurred by the City, both in the Trial Court and Appellate Court, if any, or the City may at its option bring proceedings to enforce against the Petitioner and/or Petitioner's ,surety, specific performance of the contract and compliance with the standards adopted by the City of Tigard, and in any event, in a like manner, the City shall be entitled to recover such sums as the court may adjudge reasonable for the City attorney's fees and cost, both in the Trial Court and and Appellate Court, if any. 4. Petitioner, concurrent with the execution hereof, agrees to pay the following fees and charges: a. A plan check and inspection fee to cover the cost of City review of public mainline construction plans and, in the City's interest, periodic inspection of mainline construction (except building connections) in the. amount of $ 100.00 b. A connection permit fee to cover the cost of processing building connection permit applications and performing inspection of building connection(s). Said fee to be determined, levied, and paid prior to connection of building sewers to (this) public mainline sewer. ctly or indirectly (strike inapplicable C. A surcharge to connect dire word) to an existing public mainline sanitary sewer which was installed without cost to the Petitioner. Said surcharge to be determined, levied, and paid (by the Petitioner) in accord with terms of agreement between the City and N.A. d. A monthly sewer service charge for use of the public sanitary sewer system. 5. While the City agrees to make periodic inspections as, in the City's judgment, is necessary to assure compliance, the Petitioner agrees to provide certification that the improvement has been installed in accord with City standards and the approved improvement plan; said certification to be signed by a registered civil engineer. 6. The Petitioner agrees to provide the City with 48 hour advance notice of commencement of construction and, also, 12 hour advance notice of requested field inspections. fF ,k 7. The Petitioner agrees to insure that Petitioner's engineer obtains accurate as-built (field) construction records ,of said sewer installation and, also, agrees to insure that the City is furnished with one accurate as-built mylar ' thereof and, further, with accurate legal descriptions of all necessary easements. 2 - 9. At such time with as all public improvements have been 'completed certificate Y s requirements, -Petitioner _in accordance of installation conformance" shall submit Of readiness the. aforesaid notification for conditional ac to the Cit by the Cit acceptance Y to notify the City Petitioner will Y that all inspection and, then, upon in formsubmit to requirements have been approved b City a good _and sufficient meta the the contract p Y the City, in a sum maintenance maintenancerice to assure equal to twenty bond, becoming a correction of Y percent (20X) of acceptance of t apparent or arising within oneny defective or he public improvements b work Y the City. year after conditional 10. Upon receipt of certification from requirements-have the Department of City Council` been met, and a Development Services Petitioner' l agrees to accept- the one year Maintenance Petitioner's correction o Public Bond, the one year. f deficiencies, and improvements subject to of I maintenance, for a period of 11, That Petitioner construct , in consideration a public sanitary °f City approval easements held Y mainline of the application a by or to be sewer within to i gree to save, hold held by the Cit Che boundaries of and employees harmless and IndemnifyY, does hereby covenant r ever for and from all the Y, its Y other claims Cit officers and Petitioner, obligation- that demands, damages and agents , his officers can or could arise from each and strespass upon propert ' agents, contractors and the neglect or ees and costs, if Y� outside of' the easement area employees, or againstsuchY, necessarily Including from trespass whole claims, with the y incurred by the S attorney's with re&peel to intent and purpose that City in defending held liable for in connection amounts it the City shall afforded Petitioner for with may be required be exercise of real to Pay or be sewer construction °r assumed IN WITNESS Purposes. Privileges authorityWHEREOF, the parties have executed vested in each of them. this agreement � 4 Pursuant to 1ITX F TIGAlZD: ;r PETITIONER: y� Intemation alpro ties Y Jc4 • �c►aua N ` tY Recorder 'tach Notary Acknowledgement hereto t ) Return ; Signed Copy to: 1111j/0214s) r r. > t CI'T'Y 10 'FIGARD,-ORE(Y)i1 CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TITLE: Labor Relations Consulting CONTRACT No. 000045 This agreement is made this _ q qday of August 1985 betwee. Scott, and Associates, 1615 Court Street N.E. Salem, Oregon, 97301 and the City of Tigard The parties have previously entered into a personal services agreement dated January, 28 1985, and agree that the terms and conditions shall continue except as amended: The parties agree to extend the personal services agreement through fiscal year 1985-86. DON SCOTT & ASSOCIATES CITY OF TIGARD ' BY._ BY: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY / AGENDA OF: August 19, 1985 AGENDA ITEM #: I • � L`l DATE SUBMITTED. August 15;-1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approve Board and Committee Appointments PREPARED BY: Loreen Wilson REQUESTED BY: Advisory Committee DEPARTMENT HEAD OK:-- 74 CITY ADMINISTRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY The Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee interviewed applicants for the Economic Development & Transportation committees on August 14, 1985. Attached are the applications of those people interviewed. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve attached resolutions appointing the following people: Economic Development Committee: Susan Clark Term expires January 16, 1987 NW Area Representative Dick Cochran Term expires January 16, 1987 At Large Member Transportation Committee: Dennis Hummel 'Term expires December 31, 1985 South Tigard/Summerfield Representative 2. Take no action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Alternate #1. lw/3098A h (' CITYQFTIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION \ NAME: ii i.:9.�J� L/ 7f'V DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): //'�IeA .i�•c✓ �l-G ey•rZG RES. PHONE: ADDRESS (BUS.): /, 'lets_y. ca. 1711 /.✓ BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: .T /5''q 4-- 64 LiJcGt WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? q s i�C /\f o� /-7/ EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND ; S t r�fN r yclr S/ OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: �IIC�iC� �I✓t�+c�5/ '� �%,EB� i'c`'.� � f��5� �rrG i1/ J /f+/i �iCc't•✓.�1c/��la�* i f 1-16x' /2191/�1 7712F C.,ry/c'.S' GAfT to 0,: IWd,T.' at IV/o'Oy44 77 co. HOW LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FI&19' IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? 9 PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: t gg i ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: `.KE Z Si C&C n 1 - " ,v' e e'er= I7rdET� .ve�dG7°n/1 C.✓c.�c,,/ leo n:c .c.. T?c'��, OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): ' N��t /�� fac7Vc`r %"!''NcS' ,+A/ sG't Ilex / T-ve- ZA. I 1-;.,e'4 7. i k BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: �ECaN� 1-t /G �cyc�d "IF.V; CJ/7i'jid'Mf �. ---- --- -- --- - - -------- - - ------- - Date Received at'City_Hall Date Interviewed Date, Appointed Board, Committee,` or NPO Inside City Outside City (03460)- , ✓G� ( -CITYOF TIG.4RD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION �£ NAME Susan W. Clark DATE: 7/8/85 ADDRESS (RES.): 10065 SW Riverwood Lane RES. PHONE: 684-0348 ADDRESS (BUS. ): Tigard, OR 97224 BUS. PHONE: 620-7575 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD 9 mo. SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? 1980-84 NY' & CA; 1976-80 NE Portland; 1970-76 Corvallis EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: M.Ed. from OSU, dA from Hanover College OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: Director of Oregon Human Development's Center for Employment Training on Cascade Blvd. HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 3 mo. 'S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: Neighborhood Planning Advisory Committee, 1979-80, Portland ORGANIZATIONS ,`.ND OFFICES: Buckman Neighborhood Assoc. , delegate to above committee OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): I am very interested inbecotr�ing involved in community ac ivities since 1980 I have lived in Qne state and worked in a neighboring state, which made community involvement in either state difficult. Since I now live and w work in Tigard I look forward to active community work. 'OARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERES'T'ED IN: s Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or NPO Inside<City ; Outside City (0346p) _ NYU r CITYOF TIGARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATION / ` / DATE`. / -_ .j/�� NAME: ✓e'r.1.: ,5 f Y U I e_"e ADDRESS (RES.): 14cl-7 S:v IC)3`-`� �e 4,0—O✓ RES. PHONE: 3Z1f%'llL�� BUS. PHONE: �y �J S �j� ADDRESS (BUS.): �'�( �S SCJ bei �r ti F� LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD: SUGGESTED BY: WHERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: �-� 'Oce- OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: / Vek,da laud els.-Ic f A',Q e'lA )C-k 3(j' l(, Ae-cI- c• HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? 17 IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPA APPLICANTS ONLY)? PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: / a Q n r✓��7 Z t ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): 7- f' t= H - is Al d tact n e,r,c► BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERESTED IN: /r a,v5 r ti '--------------- -------------- --------- --T ---- � Date Received .at City ,Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, Committee, or,;NPO Inside' City Outside City ( RECEIVED ` -ITYOF TI LARD CITIZEN COMMITTEE INTEREST APPLICATIONCITV 19H4 Y 'TIGARD NAME: laA, 4J -31'trcY� .-. DATE: ADDRESS (RES.): jJ17.i ,��J E:1�}��x�. Sj RES. PHONE: G 3`7—fes Y:P' ADDRESS (BUS.): BUS. PHONE: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD; ,� 6irJ SUGGESTED BY: WHERE ,DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: .,1 .01*SlZ64- G�c� OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND: rY/r�-�" 00 IT HOW LANG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM? "S THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA (NPO APPLICANTS ONLY)?" PREVIOUS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY: ORGANIZATIONS AND OFFICES: .�/.- r-� •-• - OTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REMARKS): OARDS COMMITTEES OR NPO INTERES'T'ED IN: - xns e7.��- '7"i.�is (�c►t/i.�i +-e= fj v ' ------ --- - --- ----------------- Date Received at City Hall Date Interviewed Date Appointed Board, COmmittee. or NPO : Lnside City i Outside City '710346p)