The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 04/23/1984 �a TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE:` Anyone wishing to speak on an 41 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate X APRIL 23,:. 1984, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, y- O FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start H P` 10865 SW WALNUT of that agenda item. Visitor's agenda items TIGARD, ,OREGON :97223 are asked to be kept to 2-minutes or less; longer matters can be set for a-future Agenda by con- tacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 7:30 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1.1 -Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 7:35 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) RECESS COUNCIL MEETING 7:40 3. TURA MEETING 3.1 Roll Call 3.2 Business Items 3.3 Adjournment RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING 7:45 4. SALE OF CITY PROPERTY PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 SW Pinebrook Property-- Residential 4.2 SW Main Street Property -Commercial o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation of Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Council Consideration/Direction to Staff. 7:50 5. DARTMOUTH LID PREASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Gross Examination o Recommendation of Staff o Public Hearing Closed o Council Consideration/Direction to Staff o Ordinance No. 84- Setting Preassessments 8:10 6. UPAA AGREEMENT o Recommendation of Planning Staff 8:20 7. PARK PLACE APPEAL CONSIDERATION o Consideration by Council 8:30 8. 135TH AVENUE LID WORKSHOP o Director of Public Works COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 23, 1984 - PAGE 1 9:00 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 4-84/NPO #3/WGK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PUBLIC HEARING A recommendation by City of Tigard Planning Commission for a Comprehensive Plan: Change from Professional Office to High Density Residential on 4.33 acres, located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy.'' (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1- 10AC, Tax lot 1000). o Public 'Hearing' Opened o Summation by Planning Staff o Public Testimony: ProponenLs, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation of Planning Staff o Council Discussion o Tentative Decision,By Council o Public Hearing Closed o Council Consideration & Final Decision 9:10 10. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 12-84/NPO #7/LEE CUNNINGHAM PUBLIC HEARING'' A. recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission for a Comprehensive Plan change from medium Density:` Residential to Professional Office on property located at 12528 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard (Wash. Co. =Tax Map 1S1 `33AD, Tax Lot 2400). o Public Hearing;Opened o Summation by Planning Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation of 'Planning Staff o' Council'Discussion o Tentative Decision By Council w o Public Hearing Closed o Council Consideration & Final Decision 9:15 11. COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS PUBLIC HEARINGS o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Staff � . o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation of Planning Staff o Council Discussion o Tentative Decision By Council o Public Hearing Closed o Council Consideration & Final Decision 11.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 1-84/NPO # 3/TAX LOT PLAN DESIGNATION A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to assign the low density residential plan designation to tax lots within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. The properties are located south of Walnut, east of 135th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 4, Tax _Lots 400, 500, 501,502 & 503). ORDINANCE NO. 84- 11.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 2 -84/ZONING UPON ANNEXATION A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to add a policy to the City's Comprehensive Plan requiring that lands annexed to the city be given ;the city zoning designation which most closely conforms to the existing county designation for the property. The policy will be added as 10.1.3 in the Comprehensive Plan. ORDINANCE : NO. 84- COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 23, 1984 - PAGE 2 11.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 3-84/FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding designation of sites of floodplain areas within the City's Urban Growth Boundary wi:--h a floodplain district overlay.' 11.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA :-84/Chapter 18.114: SIGN EXCEPTIONS A recommendation by the;City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend - Chapter18.114: SIGNS, of the Community Development Code to add standards for approval of sign code exceptions. ORDINANCE ND. 84- 11.3 COMPREHENSIVE' PLAN 'AMENDMENT/CPA 6-84/CHAPTER 18.130: CONDITIONAL,;USES A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend Chapter 18.130 of the Tigard Municipal Code, Conditional Uses, adding standards for approval of Transient lodging; Wholesale, storage and distribution; Participation sports and recreation' - indoor and j outdoor; and Vehicle fuel sales with convenience sales. ORDINANCE NO. 84 11.6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'AMENDMENT/CPA 7-84/VOLUME 1 & VOLUME 2 - DEQ A' recommendation by the City of Tigard 'Planning Commission to amend the Air, Water & Land Resources Quality Comprehensive Plan Report, Volume' I and to amend Volume 2, Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies as recommended by the Department of Environmental Quality. ORDINANCE NO. 84- 11.7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN` AMENDMENT/CPA 8-84/POLICY 6.3.2 (b) COMPATIBILITY A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend policy 6.3.2 fib;, compatibility standards for density transition, in Volume II, Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies. ORDINANCE NO. 84- 11.8 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 9-84/CHAPTER 18.26 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend Chapter 18.26 of the Community Development Code adding definitions for "Home Occupations"; "Remodel"; "Addition"; "Compatibility"; "Window"; "Face"; and "Story, half"- ORDINANCE NO. 84- 11.9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 10-84/COMMUNI'T'Y DEVELOPMENT CODE A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding various sections of the Community Development Code. A complete list of the Sections recommended for amendments and the proposed language changes are available in the City's Planning Department. OPEN & 11.10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 13-84/BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS CONTINUE A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding Section 18.98 of the Community Development Code. OPEN & 11.11 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 14-84/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOCUMENT CONTINUE A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding various sections of Volumes I, II, and III of the comprehensive plan in response to issues raised in correspondence from Washington County, the Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland, Oregon Legal Services Corporation, The Department of Environmental Quality, The Oregon State Housing Division, 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and the Land Conservation and Development Commission Staff. COUNCIL AGENDA - APrIL 23, 1984 PAGE 3 MITRM OPEN & 11.12; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 15-84/SETBACKS IN THE CG AND CP :C^�NTINUE ZONES' A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding the required setbacks in the General Commercial (CG) and Commercial Professional (CP) zones. OPEN & 11.13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 16-84/AMENDMENT DECISIONPROCESS CONTINUE A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding Chapter 18.32 to allow the Planning Director to amend a decision after findings have been prepared' in response to issues that are raised prior to the appeal deadline. OPEN & 11.14 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 17-84/DENSITY TRANSITION: CONTINUE 'A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding' the Density Transition section of the code, section 18.40.040, and conditions when application of this ,provision may not be required. 10:40` 12. 'L.C.D.C. STATUS REPORT o Director of Planning & Development 10:50 13. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered' to be routine and may be enacted in one 'motion without separate discussion. anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: ` 13.1 Approve Council Minutes - April 9,>1984 13.2 Accept Departmental Reports 13.3 Ratify Appointment of Board & Committee Members: Approve Resolution No. 84- 26 Economic Development Committee Approve Resolution No. 84- 27 Park Borrd 13.4 Approve Resolution No. 84- 28 Civic Center Advisory Committee Scope and Focus 13.5 Receive Bonita Road Report and Contract Authorization 13.6 Approve Procedure On Delivery Of Council Packets 13.7 Award Retirement Study Consultant Proposal 13.8 Approve League of Oregon Cities Agreement - Resolution No. 84- 29 13.9 Receive and File Tilp Letter 13.10 Table OLCC Application - The Stadium Club, 11445 SW Pac. Hwy./A Lic 13.11 Approve Resolution No. 84- 30 Opposing BPA's Proposed Average System Cost Rale Plan 13.12 Approve Resolution No. 84- 31 To Begin Maintenance Period For Hoodview Sanitary Sewer Extension 13.13 Approve Resolution No. 84- 32 Accepting 114th Place Subdivision 13.14 Approve Resolution No. 84- 33 Ratify Approval of WCCLS Agreement 13.15 Deny Request For Century 21 Homes Fee Refund 13.16 Accept Dedication & Easement on 72nd Avenue - Predelivery Corp. & Authorize Mayor pro tem and Deputy Recorder To Sign. 10:55 14. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 11:00 15. ADJOURNMENT 1433A COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 23, 1984 - PAGE 4 — t s T I G.A R D C IT Y C 0 U N C I L Ar REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. i. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor pro tem Kenneth Scheckla; Councilors: Tom< Brian, John Cook, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Frank Currie, Director of Public Works; Bob Jean, City Administrator;; Bill Monahan,'' Director of Planning & Development; Mark O'Donnell, Legal Counsel; Jerri 'Widner, Finance Director (leaving at 9:15 P.M.); and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator noted areas of consent agenda to be revised. b. Councilor' Scott requested items 13.2, 13.7, 13.8,' & 13.9 be pulled from the consent agenda and considered separately. Staff and Council 'discussed anti-trust laws and possible lack of insurance coverage ;for Council. The City Administrator suggested that this be .discussed in detail at a workshop for Council scheduled for: 6/11/84. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. Geraldine Ball, 11515 SW 91st Avenue, cautioned Council that 68th Parkway Sewer ;improvement' should be coordinated with the State since they have some development going on in the area. City Administrator reported that staff is working with State and hopes to award bids for the City's improvement on May 21, 1984. b. Vic Kaczynski, 12985 SW 135th Avenue, requested Council look .^t other alternatives to Murray Road extension besi&-., connecting with 121st at Gaarde Street. C. Andy Tilp, 14495 SW 30th Place, expressed concern about home which has been under dispute regarding height limit and window height recently. He is ready to move into the home and wishes to have the matter resolved so that he can do that. Councilor Scott stated that Mrs. Clinton was in the audience, a neighbor to the home in question, and is prepared to present new information which should be considered regarding the issue. Director of Planning & Development stated that the "new evidence" submitted by Mrs. Clinton was not going to affect the issue and recommended Council not delay this matter any further. After further discussion, Legal Counsel requested Council hear further information under "non-agenda" to allow him time to study the file so that an opinion could be given. Consensus of Council was to hear issue under non-agenda items at the end of the meeting. Page l - COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 23, 1984 RECESS COUNCIL MEETING: 8:09 P.M. 4. TURA MEETING 4.1ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Chairman Kenneth -,Scheckla; Agency- Members: Tom Brian, John Cook, and Ima Scott; City Staff: Frank Currie, ` Director of Public Works; Bob Jean, City Administrator;r Bill Monahan, Director of Planning & Development; Mark O'Donnell, Legal Counsel; Jerri Widner, Finance Director; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 4.2 Director' of Planning & Development stated that there was no business at this time, however, the procedures for close out would be;presented at the 5/14/84 meeting. 4.3 TURA Meeting Adjourned: 8;10 F.M. RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING: 8:10 P.M. 5. SALE OF CITY PROPERTY PUBLIC HEARINGS 51 SW Pinebrook Property - Residential 5.2 SW Main Street Property - Commercial a.' Public Hearing Opened b. Finance Director stated that Council has declared this property as surplus' according; to =ORS requirements. City Administrator suggested that both parcels be considered in the same 'public hearing. C. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. d. Finance Director recommended Council adopt terms and conditions of the sale and give authorization for solicitation of bids. e. Public Hearing Closed f. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to accept staff recommendation of terms and conditions of sale and authorize solicitation of bids with placement of 'for sale' signs on the two properties. Council agreed to not list the property with any real estate agent. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 6. DARTMOUTH LID PREASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING a. Public Hearing Opened b. Finance Director stated that Council formed the district on 4/9/84 and within that formation ordinance required her to do a preassessment on the properties. ` C. Public Testimony: Page 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - 'APRIL 23, 1984 Proponents: ._ Mr. W. C. Cox, representing Robert Randall Company', 9500 SW Barbur Blvd., Portland, stated they were in - favor of the preassessment amount. Anne Thompson, representing Mr. Homer Williams, 117 SW Taylor, Portland, supported the assessment as proposed. Mr. Lou Christen, 17895 SW Shasta Trails, Tualatin, supported the assessment amount. Opponents: Mr. Chuck, Ruttan, Attorney representing the Martin family, stated there were some procedural problems with the hearing; and noted that the assessment hearing was being conducted prematurely with notice of the meeting being rather short and offered TMC Section 13.04.080 in support of that statement. He requested matter be withdrawn from the agenda at this point since the City will not be doing the improvements, but contracting them out instead. Legal Counsel stated that notice of the hearing was proper, the City has the jurisdiction to hold the, hearing and recommended the preassessment: hearing proceed. y Mr. Ruttan stated his concerns were that the assessment appears to be arbitrary, four properties were removed from the assessment district, however, the assessment total remains the same. The Engineer does not identify the relationship between the property owners and the benefit. There is no recognition of public benefit mentioned in the Engineer's report for the 60 foot wide right:-of-way that is proposed. Mr. Ruttan also noted that only a few property owners were being required to pay for the improvements for the benefit of the community as a whole. He also stated that Mr. Buford, Mr. Martin's engineer, will testify regarding the drainage problems in the area and submitted a copy of Buford's resume' for the record. Legal Counsel stated this hearing was for assessment issues only, that Mr. Ruttan's arguments seem to pertain to creation of the district. Legal Counsel requested Mr. Ruttan not be repetitive. Mr. Ruttan stated that the preassessments and amount of assessments was wrong and that is what his testimony will strive to show. Mr. Gary Buford, 412 N. State Street, Lake Oswego, stated he has been involved in various LID's as the engineer and was concerned that water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer location and building requirements were not in the Engineer's report and not on file at City Hall. He also noted that the Engineer's report assumes exactly the same benefit for all properties. He felt this was incorrect. He suggested that this is perhaps a mockery of what an assessment hearing is all about. Page 3 COUNCIL MINUTES - AYRIL 23, 1984 Legal Counsel questioned Mr. Buford whether he has been involved in representing local governments, in formation of LID's, regarding the standard utility, improvements which are proposed for the roadway in the improvement. He noted that the standards for developing utilities is set out by Unified Sewerage Agency. Legal Counsel further noted that the allegation of no information being ' furnished is a serious one. - Director of Public Works stated that the utilities being included in the .LID were those that are necessary to ;build;the road. There will be additional utilities that need to be constructed for each of the individual .properties. Therefore, the equal :benefit to each property for utilities is only for those utility items which' are necessary ,to include ;to construct the road. He noted this information was also covered various times in the formation hearing. Mr.; Buford stated that there was not sufficient information on file at City Hall by which; he could make a professional recommendation to his client. Director of Public Works stated that there seemsto be sufficient information in the Engineer's Report for Mr. Wright, the project engineer, to make recommendations. Also no one has contacted Mr.' Wright or the Director of Public Works to discuss the report. ' Mr.' Ruttan concluded by requesting the opportunity to give additional written testimony as to the appropriateness of the assessment at a later date. City Administrator stated staff's recommendation is still to pass the ordinance as proposed. However, Council could close the public hearing and then consider further information at the 5/14/84 meeting. Councilor Scott questioned whether Legal Counsel could recommend action tonight. Legal Counsel stated that the opponents have had more than ample time to prepare statements. He noted that the Council has wide discretion- to act. The courts would defer to the Council's judgment unless it was arbitrary or capricious. The opponents have raised various procedural objections; basically that there was insufficient time and information -available. Legal Counsel stated that his first recommendation would be to close the public hearing and then proceed to make a policy decision if the assessments are the way Council wants them. d`. Public Hearing Closed e. Council Consideration ' Councilor Brian stated the key concern seems to be the issue of the utilities- which are included in the LID. He asked the Director of Public Works to address that point. Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - `APRIL 23, 1984 Director of Public ' Works reported that the utilities being assessed were only those needed for the road development. These utility lines are being put in only to the extent that are needed for the road. Other utilities can be put in as the properties in the area develop. This is being included in the LID so as to protect the street from being cut after it is in place. f. ORDINANCE NO. 84-18 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ASSESSMENT FORI.ULA FOR THE DARTMOUTR EXTENSION STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 40, CREATED PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 84-17. g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to adopt. F Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. € FINANCE DIRECTOR 'LEFT: 9:15 P.M. k W 7. UPAAAGREEMENT a. Director of Planning & Development , stated that unless this agreement is passed, 'Council may; not be able to act on the Park Place Appeal issue. At the last meeting, Council directed staff to work out the problemsandcoordinate with Washington County. Director 'gave _history of issues and stated that there are 5 temporary design guidelines for the Murray Blvd. extension. Metro . is currently doing a SW Corridor Study to supply more information which is needed before a 'final decision should be made on this issue. : r City Administrator stated that the resolution reactivating and clarifying the UPAA only notes the corridor study, a decision does not need to be made now as to the extension or whether an extension would be direct or indirect. b. Rick Daniels, Director of Planning & Transportation with Washington County, encouraged the adoption of the UPAA so that Tigard could gain approval for its' comprehensive plan with LCDC. C. Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, NPO #3 Chairman, stated that the UPAA should specify a 350' curve radius for streets and that it should be approved after the Park Place Appeal decision has been ; rendered. d. Rick Daniels stated that a 700' curve radius was not possible in � the Park Place area anyway. : e. Mike Fain, representing Century 21 Properties the developer for Park Place, stated the issue of the curve radius was academic in that the area cannot sustain a 700' radius. f. RESOLUTION NO. 84-34 A RESOLUTION REACTIVATING AND CLARIFYING THE URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TIGARD AND WASHINGTON COUNTY. g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve. Page 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 23, 1984 OL _ _ �— h. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor cook to amend the resolution as follows (additions are underlined): "2. A. (2) The need and 'location of an indirect connection or connections between Murray Blvd./Scholls rFerry Road and Gaarde Street/99W; and" "3. F. The curve radius will be a minimum of 350 feet." Motion to amend Resolution No. 84-34 was approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. Motion to approve Resolution No. 84-34 as amended was 'approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. 8. PARK PLACE APPEAL CONSIDERATION a. Director of Planning & Development synopsized issue to date and recommended the Counciladopt alternative #1 which' is set out below and authorize a refund of 50% of the- fees-paid by Washington County for the appeal. "Alternate #1 Approve the application with conditions: A. Applicant prepare revised plan which incorporates the design guidelines established by Resolution No. 84-34. B. Applicant submit the revised plans to the Planning Director for approval." vb. Councilor Scott stated she felt no refund would be appropriate since staff has spent so much time on the appeal. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve the application with conditions as set out in Alternate Motion approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. d. Kathy Baxter, 135th Avenue resident, noted her concerns regarding the street extension from Murray Blvd. to 121st Avenue. She said she did not wart to have the street too busy. e. Herman Porter, 11875 SW Gaarde Street, was concerned that the Council may give its' options away to an indirect route. f. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to uphold the Planning Commission decision and deny the appeal. Approved by a 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay• onded by Councilor Brian to deny the g. Motion by Councilor Scott, sec request for a fee waiver by the County. ' Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 23,' 1984 9. 135TH AVENUE LID WORKSHOP a. Gene Ginther, Project Engineer for the, LID, 'stated that this was a Washington County LID. He outlined the project scope and stated there would be a joint Council/County Commission meeting in June to hear the issues. 10. COMP PLAN AMENDMENT PUBLIC `HEARINGS a. LaValle Allen, NPO #4 Chairman, stated that the NPO has some concerns regarding the proposed amendments since they have only been seen, by the CCI and not presented to the NPOs. b. Director of Planning & Development stated the NPO's have had ample time to study the issue since the chairmen of each NPO were to take it backtothe NPOs after it was presented to the CCI on the third Monday of March. 11. COMPREHENSIVE 'PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 12-84/NPO #7/LEE CUNNINGHAM - PUBLIC HEARING A recommendation by the City of Tigard" Planning Commission for a Comprehensive Plan change from ;medium Density Residential to Professional_ Office on property located at 12528; SW Scholls Ferry' Road, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map ISI 33RD, Tax Lot 2400). a. Public Hearing Opened ( b. Director of Planning & Development synopsized history for Council. C. Public Testimony: Lee Cunningham requested Council approve the request. d. Director of Planning & Development recommended approval of the proposal. e. Public Hearing Closed f. ORDINANCE NO. 84-19 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTINC FINDINGS AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT (CPA 12-84 CUNNINGHAM) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. g. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 12. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN :.MENDMENT/CPA 4-84/NPO #3/WGK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PUBLIC HEARING A recommendation by City of Tigard Planning Commission for a Comprehensive Plan Change from Professional Office to High Density Residential on 4.33 acres, located on the northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy. (Wash. Co. Tax rap 2Sl IOAC, Tax lot 1000). a. Public Hearing Opened b. Director of Planning & Development summarized history of issue. Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1984 c. Public Testimony: Fred Anderson, 11550 SW Bull Mountain Road, discussed his concerns and storm sewer for, the property noting he regarding the sanitary development if these issues` were was not opposed to the addressed. Mr. Anderson presented a statement of sewer service availability from Unified Sewerage Agency and a map showing property in question. Ryan O'Brien, developer, stated that the issue of sewer Mr. Ry to be addressed by the availability and drainage were proposed when this issue is Planning Commission at theirRev/ew8hear•ing.1g The developers agree scheduled for a Site Design with Mr. Anderson that these issues need to be addressed. & Mrs. Gregory Artis, 11670 SW Bull Mountain A letter from Dr. their opposition to the ; Road, was read into the record noting change. proposed plan Development recommended approval of the a. Director of Planning & proposal. i Q, Public Hearing Closed. FINDINGS AND UP f• ORDINANCE N0. 84^-220 AN ORDINANCEADOPTING OF IAG COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOLDING Tom` PLANNING COMMISSION S ,APP AMENDMENT (CPA 4-84) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. seconded b Councilor Cook to a g, dopt. Motion by Councilor Brian, y h. Leal Counsel suggested Council may want the ordinance rewritten and conclusions are there in so that the submission of findings Anderson's testimony• compliance with Mr. i, City Administrator suggested tentative approval and recommended staff prepare another ordinance fo- consideration at the 5/14/84 meeting. J• Councilors Brian and Cook withdrew the motion to adopt from the floor. k. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to authorize ordinance with findings for the 5114/84 staff to prepare an meeting• vote of Council present. Approved by unanimous 13. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA i Bard Planning ng CommissionDtolassign Nthe A recommendation by the City of Tigard low density residential plan designation to tax lots within the City's Tine properties are located south of Walnut, Urban Growth Boundary. 501, 502 & east of 135th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 4, Tax Lots 400, 500, 503). ORDINANCE NO. 84-opened a, Public Hearing P Page 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1984 b, Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue" to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 14. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 2 -84/ZONING UPON ANNEXATION . A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to add a pclicy to the City's Comprehensive Plan requiring that lands annexed to the city; be given the city zoning, designation which most closely conforms :to the existing, county designation for the property. The policy will be addedas10.1.3 in the Comprehensive Plan. a. Public Hearing Opened b, Motion by Councilor Cook, _seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 15.' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 3-84/FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY A :recommendation by the City , of Tigard Planning Commission regarding designation of sites of floodplain areas within the City's Urban Growth Boundary with a floodplain district overlay. a, Public Hearing Opened b, Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 16. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 5-84/Chapter 18.114: SIGN EXCEPTIONS A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend Chapter 18.114: SIGNS, of the Community Development Code to add standards for approval of sign code exceptions. a. Public Hearing Opened ok, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue b. Motion by Councilor Co to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 17. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 6-84/CHAPTER 18.130: CONDITIONAL USES A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend Chapter 18.130 of the Tigard Municipal Code, Conditional Uses, adding standards 'for approval. of Transient lodging; Wholesale, storage and distribution; Participation sports and recreation - indoor and outdoor; and Vehicle fuel sales -with convenience sales. a, Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue �. to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1984 n 18. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 7-84/VOLUME 1 & VOLUME '2 - DEQ A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend the Air, Water, & Land Resources, Quality Comprehensive Plan,Report, Volume 1 and to amend Volume 2, Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies as recommended by the :Department of Environmental Quality. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous :vote of Council present. 19. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 8-84/POLICY 6.3.2,"(b) COMPATIBILITY A. recommendation by the City of Tigard Plann �..g Commission to amend policy 6.3.2 (b), compatibility standards for density transition, in Volume II, Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 20. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 9-84/CHAPTER 18.26 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEFINITIONS A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend Chapter 18.26 of the Community Development Code adding definitions for „ �°. a n, a ��. "Home Occupations"; "Remodel"; Addition Compatibility Window , "Face"; and tOStory, half'". - -- - — a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 21. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/'CPA 10-84/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding various sections of the Community Development Code. A complete ,list of the Sections recommended for amendments and the proposed language changes are available in the City's Planning Department. a. Public Hearing Opened_ b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. j C 22. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 13-84/BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding Section 18.98 of the Community Development Code. Page 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 23, 1984 opened a.' public 1'.earing 0 p Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue b, Motion by to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 23e COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA f4.T gardrlPPlanningE CommiPLAN ssi n regarding A recommendation by the City comprehensive pian he II,.sand III of the comp ton County, .the various sections of Volumes I,correspondence from Washington response to "issues raised in corresp olitan_ Portland, Oregon Legal ; Qu The Home Builders Association of Metropolitan of Environmental Q Y, The Dep Metro and the Services Corporation, The 1,000 Friends of Oregon, Oregon' State Housing Land Conservation and Development Commission Staff. ti a. Public Hearing Opened b, Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. D Cp M REHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 15-84/SETICommissionNrregardingsthe e 24. COP the City of Tigard Planning A recommendation by G required setbacks in the General Commercial (CG) and Commercial } Professional (CP) zones. a. Public Hearing Opened ! b, Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. ISION PS 25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA 16-84a AMENDMENT DPlanningC Commis R on Sregarding A recommendation by the City of TT/CPA to amend a decision after Chapter 18.32 to allow the Planning findings have been prepared in response to issues that are raised prior to the appeal deadline. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue to April 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of. Council present. the City of Tigard Planning Commission regarding the -84/DENSITY TRANSITION 26. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/CPA. 17-84/DL and A recommendation by section 18.40.040, Density Transition section of the code, conditions wher. application of this. provision may not be required. a. Public Hearing Opened Page 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1984 b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to continue ' to April '30, 1984. Approved by unanimous `vote o2 Council present'. 27. L.C.D.C. STATUS REPORT a. Planning Director distributed items for study and noted this issue would be presented at a later date. 28. APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES 4-9-84 a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 29. ACCEPT DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS a. Councilor Scott requested additional informationfrom the Director ` of Public Works regarding his monthly report. Councilors Scott and" Scheckla questioned the Director' of Planning S Development regarding his report. b. Motion by 'Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. // Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. li 30. RESOLUTION NO. 84-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING _ APPOINTMENT TO THE TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. (Mr. Robert Williams) a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 31. RESOLUTION NO. 84-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE TIGARD PARK AND RECREATION BOARD. (Mr. Steve Newman and Mr. Steve Slabaugh) a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. t r Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. i 32. RESOLUTION NO. 84-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, ESTABLISHING A CIVIC CENTER PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. (7 member board) a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 33. ACCEPT SLOPE EASEMENT ON BONITA ROAD - Wallace J. Brosseau - $700.00 AND AWARD BID FOR $5,900 TO RUTAN CONSTRUCTION FOR REPAIR WORK a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 12 COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 23, '1984 I 34. APPROVE PROCEDURE ON DELIVERY OF COUNCIL PACKETS a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to table issue until June 11, 1984 meeting when new Council can consider issue. Approved; by unanimous vote of Council present. 35- 94ARD RETIREMENT STUDY CONSULTANT PROPOSAL a. Councilor Scott questioned why $12,000 was being spent on a retirement study. b. City Administrator reported that Council had required this study when the TMEA and< TPOA Labor Contracts were signed.' Staff- has gory out to bid and the bid from Milliman and Robertson, Inc. was the lowest bid. C. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to award consultant work to Milliman and Robertson, Inca and direct staff not to 'exceed ;$12,000. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 35. RESOLUTION NO. 84-29 A ' RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF ,TIGARD TO EXECUTE AND ENDORSE' AN 'AGREEMENT WITH THE LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES GOVERNING THE LEAGUE STATUS AS A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, SIMILAR TO OTHER, COOPERATIVE INTER-GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES IN WHICH CITIES CREATE AND PARTICIPATE- a. City Administrator reported that currently the League's membership cost is 27.5¢ per capita and discussed the areas the League assists cities with. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 37. RECEIVE AND FILE TILP LETTER AND ACCEPT STAFF REPORT a. Councilor Scott explained that Mrs. Clinton had been present at the meeting earlier and said she had new evidence regarding this issue. Since Mrs. Clinton was not present at this time, Councilor Scott thanked Mr. & Mrs. Tilp for waiting for this item on the agenda. b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to accept staff report and receive and file the Tilp letter. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page 13 COUKaIL MINUTES APRIL 23, 1984 38. TABLE ©LCC APPLICATION - The Stadium Club, 11445 SW Pac. Hwy./A Lic t' seconded by Councilor Brian to table. a. Motion by Councilor Cook, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 39, RESOLUTION NO. 84-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE T..ARD CITY COUNCIL OPPOSING BPA'S PROPOSED AVERAGE;SYSTEMCOST RATE PLAN. seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. a. Motion by Councilor Cook, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.IGARD : IL 40, RESOLUTION N0. 84-31 WAR LUTION OF EXTENSIONTHE T CONSTRUCTEDTYFORU LOTS ACCEPTING2AND23, HOODVIEW SANITARY F HOODVIEW SUBDIVISION. Councilor Brian to approve. f' a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by - ¢ a Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. t' 41. RESOLUTION N0. 84-32 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COLiSTRUCTED WITHIN 114TH PLACE SUBDIVISION. q a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve. f Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. k tf 42, RESOLUTION NO. 84-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD RATIFYING AND EXTENDING THE TERMS OF THE CITY'S APPROVAL TO THE WCCLS LIBRARY AGREEMENT ok, seconded by CouncilorBrianto approve. a. Motion by Councilor Co Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 43, DENY REQUEST FOR CENTURY 21 HOMES FEE REFUND a. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to deny. vote of Council present. Approved by unanimous 44. ACCEPT DEDICATION & EASEMENT ON 72ND AVENUE PREDELIVERY CORP. { AUTHORIZE MAYOR PRO TEM AND DEPUTY RECORDER TO SIGN. a, Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to accept. g Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 45. ADJOURNMENT: 12:17 A.M. \ Deputy City Recorder - City of Tigard ( ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard (lw/1499A) Page 14 COUNCIL MINUTES -- APRIL 23, 1984 TIMES PUBLISHINGCOMPANYLegs' 7-6415 P.O.BOX 370 PHON2(503)684-0360 Notice j.. BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 ` Legal Notice Advertising ,n P+R�1v�C!!tpVV'C y 231984 198a 0 ❑ Tearsheet Notice City City of Tigard- (1Fr�GAR� e PO Box 23397 a 0 Duplicate Affidavit t Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF W/ASHiNGTON, )ss. Susan PInkley being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising Director,,or his principal`clerk,of the ITigar d Time's a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020;published at_ T Lga r d` in the aforesaid county and state;that the qeTe-eted Agenda Items a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1' successive and consecutive in the following issues: April 19, 1984 Subscribed an orn to before met �'s r i 1/�20 19 8 4 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Exp 3/16/87 AFFIDAVIT V',ate ..,^ tMRm z i r x 3 T s �f 8tt: �alt •a 0'- # t�lr `fSOrf tUe MY _Wes'dM! yyy gwtW� 9e�at6Lgry�yr�v�23fII( amts ##,NAWAI "0,r,TrYC } .tom - a MEN 1 TIMES LI 1 a_e of 02 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0330 jI BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising CITY OF DGARD e' a ® Tearsheet Notice City of Tigard ° PO =Box 23397 ® 0 Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' Susan PInklev tieing first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principalclerk,of the Ti rrar�3 Timmis a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193:010 and 193.020; published at Tigard _in the aforesaid county and state; that the pihl i r"'Hear in� Nati r�-- a printed copy of which is hereto annexed,was published in the entire issue of laid newspaper for-1 successive and consecutive in the following issues: April 12 19811 Subscribed'and w rn to bef re me)his r 184 Nota Public for Oregon 3/16/87 My Commission Expir AFFIDAVIT ,w . - _ e i t 4 t ----------------- PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The following will be considered by,the Tigard City Council on Agr11 23. 1984-at 7:30.P,M.at Fowler Junior High SCha01 Lecture Roonr,10865 SW Walnut t Street Tigard.Oregon.Further Information may-be obtained from the City Recorder or Director of Planning and-Develop`slentat12755 SW Ash Avenue s, Tigard:Ore,Gan,97223,or by calling 63b\4171. CQMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CFA 1.84 CITY OF T ZAR)NPb#} 8, A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning CammN-slnn to assign :'the;low density residential plan,designation to was lots within the City's @. Urban Growth-Bouadary,The properties are located wulh of Walnut;. t; k t `east of 135th,(Kash.Co.Tax h1ap 2S1 4,Taw Lots 400,500,501,502&503 , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDIAEM CPA 2.84 CITY OF TIGARD A recommendation by the:'Cty.of:turd Pianninv Commission to add a policy to the City's Comprehensive Plan ne4uiring that lands annexed 4o the city be Riven the city zoiq g desipation which most closely coatnrms to the existing:county dmilgriation for the propertyThe golicy will be added as 10.1.3 in the Comprehensive:PIM COW.PREI3ENSIVE PLAN AMi:NWIIENT CPA'2-84 CITY OF TIGARD A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning;commission regarding . designdUon ofsite s if-fioadplain areos wia&the City's rJrban Growth .,Boundary with'a fl000plain district overlay. .. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.AMENDMENT CPA 4-84 WGR DEVELOPMENT o CORPORATION NPO#3 ` A recornmendation by City of Tigard planning Commission for a Compre• ; hensive Plan.Change from Professional Office to High Density Residen- "tial on 4.33 acres,located on the northwest corner at Beef Rend Road and SW pacific Hwy-(Wash:Co.Tax Mop 2S1 10AC,Tax lot 1000), COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 5-84 Chapter 18.114:SIGNS A.recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend YS..r 1^a crrvc,gt the Community D�volo=Mt Code WF G,dCt standard fora oval of sib end eaaapUaaa ' S co3�RF..HE,N PY,41.APA;�Np�rrc cPAs4?4 t�AI�i8.xs6 t,.`�i�SI � ; .q; Y • �§,, �TldNAL USES A rocommendatton by the City of Tigard Planning Commlastolt to tsfr+hdx" Chapter 1¢130 of,the and Muelcil�Code;ConditionalU @rt+7ib$,.:. .standards for approvai of Transient lodging;Wholesale,storage and,dis- - tribudon;:participation,sports and recreation--indOoe and outdoor:and Vehicle fuel sales with convenience sales. COMPREHENSIVE FLAN'AMENT,MENT CPA 7.84 VOLUME 1 and VOLUME 2 DEQlEsion to amend A rewrunendation by the CRY of Trard Planning Commis We Air.Water&Land Itescurcas Quality Comprebena:ve Plan Report, k Volume l and to amend Volume 2,Findings,P011Cies and Implementation - —Strategies as recommended by the';Departmeot_O Envlrsonmentnt,Quai4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDNM-qT CPA 844 pOLICY'8 3.2.(b) - A recommendation by the City of Tigard Y.anaing Cornmisaroa to amend ...policy 6.3.2 (b) In Volume II,Findings,Policies and Implementation Strategles.'- ' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9 tt4 CHAPTER18.26 COMMU NrrY DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONSs A recommendation by the City of Tigard Planning Commission to amend 4 Chapter 18.26 of the Community.Development code adding definitions for' ''•Home..Occunatiann "Remodel; "Addition 'Comnatabllity' and-_Stoe�,�hs?2"�. `.COMPREHENSWE`PLAt'l.AMENDMENT CPA-.10.84 COMMUNITY REVEL' 'OPM"n14T.CODE AMENDMENTS A recommer,daUon by the City of;Tigard Planning Commission regarding various settlors of the Community Development Cada-A campiet¢list of the _,variousSecsec recommended for'amendment3 and the proposed language changes are available in the City's PlannlggDeParm!?aL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12.94 LEE CUNNINGHAM HPO#7 . ; A recommendation by the City-of Tigard Planning for s Comprehensive Plan change from medium Density Residentlal to Profes- sional Office onprop"located at 12528 SW Scholia Ferry Road,Tigard, (Wash.Co.Tax Map ISI 33AD,Tau Lot 2460- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1384 BUILDING HEfGffl LIM1TATi0NS.13XCF�T'ONS Section rmen o 6;Cofire mmunity City Tigard ma g COmmiSlon regarding; COMPREHM4SIVE'PLAN-AMENDMENT CPA`,1484 CORE%ENSIVE PLAN DOWMENT AMENDNLLNT5 s A recorrrnegdonno by the City Of Tlgard Plannin6 Cmnmissioa Y08ard1ng various sections of.Volumes I;II,and III o4 iha-camhiagto scarive ly the response to issues raised In correspondence from Viashia�to Home Builders Association of Metrooblita6.porUand;Oregon Legal Sery ices Corporation,The Department of Environmental Quality,Tho Oregon State ilou39ng Division,1,000'Friends of Oregon,jjetra and the U,Iad Conservation and'Development Canitn3sston Stn41t COMPP,EHENSIVE PLAN kAE"h1ENT CPA 1"4 rSETBACKS IN THE CG? AND CP ZONES ' A recOtnmendatlon by the City of Tigard Pla CQGm lance regarding, the required setbarka ir1_010;Genera pmfes.tonal(Cp).zonts " COMPRF.Hslims PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 16 84 AI iCf4DMENT DELI SION PROCESS A recommendatlon by the City of Tigard Planning Com MI"on regardtag. Chapter 18.32 to allow the Planningem Director W emend a decision after findlM have hprepared in response to lasnea that Are rained prlorto; the appaW deadliro.' ' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Al,,tgNDMF.NT CpA Y7_84 DENS A recdrmmendanon by the—Y,1-Tigard Pianniag COmiaSsslan ragardifeg r th Density Transition section of the case,secUoa.8,40,040,and Cori^ k tions when appitention of this prrtvL4loo fray not he squired.. T]76402=:,PublishApH1'Y3,.1984 - .. -- w TIMES LI ILegal 7-6403 P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising ov�� 0 ® ❑ Tearsheet Notice AM- tj 38-1 City of Tigard ® PO Box 23397 Tigard, 'OR 97223 ® ❑ Duplicate Affidavit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTYOF WASHINGTON, )ss. ISusan Pinklev being fire.!..duly J___s_ __d ___-.i . . . being first vsa,y ovvuy,depose Oti fltid 1 rTl �7NOVeftlSing . Director, or his principal`clerk, of theigarimes a newspaper of general circulation as !lefineq in ORS 193. and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaid county and state;that the Pn'hl'i� Nnti�A: a'printed copy of which is hereto amiexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for-1—successive and consecutive in the following issues: April 17, 1981+; Subscribed and w rn to before me t i Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expi 3/10/87 E AFFIDAVIT r: Iwlotice !S hereby' v rf that otbe i rd Clty,Co cll Vie!!! hold s,p-abUc; lteaa3z oszMoi�il�iiy,AgD�'!Y 23,3��9,7;31;;.T?�d�t'Ygo�le;T JuAfor I3lghal -3cY�ooY�t ISi�Sgs ,Walttuk 56 t,T' ud,=Or n,�r arftg the P'rop d�Ye o2 the toblo progeitty. :, , E Patcewl I ,Asiclt s 8605 l l i r Rr f,a Y r c4,l3Ft;IY 3 f 33 tptiva�:to, SectldnAlTownship 2 . TMe�Iapxarltaeds-eW t ' lra Qutty Com E Zoning 4,'S Parte!2 Address 12420 S Habra gts ,"t l "d,OR07223 r Yle r�igttor. �e b of 9Gt4, ! Mals 281,2AD",tpod 2�lfP l'osig3?�1 , ,- J C71ID:ia1 Corergr�:beBsi�ts';�lau at zoned � tCesstr�!13usdale�s�1��-. ttAct) ; ,( alzoxeib «1 dsratd tpy € Clty �ataY' { ecaEavuis irF;.� ;X 2 - VISITOR'S AGENDA DATEApril 23 1984 ID' (limited to 2 minutes or less) please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to 'hear from you on other issues not on the ;agenda, but time may require that we schedule your items for a future ,agenda. Please contact the City Administrator as to agenda scheduling. Thank you. ITEM 'DESCRIPTION NAME, ADDRESS & AFFILIATION L [ .—�.� J i i u�*t'/�� e>t"' �rtG.� rd F�.� � .(,vt /aPa /J�' .✓r*./': —r- .)li Q ` Gt C Z S� � l Z��S Sc✓/3S"-- G DATE April 23 1984 I 'wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) M _ Item Description: # 4 - Sale of City Property I Public Hearing Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) Name, 'Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation f �L Mal r DATE Aril 23, 5984 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on j the following item: '' (Please print the information) Item Description: #5 - Dartmouth Street LID rreassessment Public Hearing Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) *�*1�l�7��*��Y1@SrC�+[��:f*it7k�'�'1C�Y��tM�iC:Q 9E M7k 3i*)47�7�C 7�'�9d'*'7k*SC 7�C9��'jL��.7Pt�Y°LSt��t�6�Ch°iYC]E it 1�9�67k"lG 7�C 11�Sr 1RC]921AC 7C 7ri�Yt St Mame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation JO NoMER -6f--1-3 (t SCJ TA11L-OiQ- Gi1LLl.91KS� LI N I hlQM9ct)N Poe j(.AAA M ?7 ,D� } V -!R-7�1,t f t t DATE April 23, 1984 E ' 1 wish t0 Cea%if before the Tigard City Council On the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: Comp-ebensive Plan k At Pndmene rVA 4 RA - W--- DEET OPMF�IT CORPORATION LT1i1 Z HEARTjG Proponent (For Issue) opponent (Against Issue) Ilam Address and Affiliation Name, Addressand Affiliation s�/'t'��LL� �...+L�.G4�i' —:- j-�/� '• . Gtc�4�lr�c 1/34 S � ;; DATE April 23, 1984 I wish to testifybefore` the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: 210 -' Comprehensive Plan Amendment' CPA 12-84 - LEE CUNNINGHAM PUBLIC HEARING Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) ASY�'t*AAAASCASCA IkA�AA*AAS°i*AA�kAA:�LAAA7CA3<AA�AAie:kAAA�AAAA*Ait�YA't71e SC 9CAAAAAASCAAAAA7kA*ASC j2AAA Nawe, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation � r i s � - - " CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: April 18, `1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA'TITLE: TURA Meeting REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY There is no business before TURA to be acted upon onApril'; 23, 1984. On May 14, 1984", Attorney Kenneth'Elliot's procedures for TURA closeout will be presented. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend that the TURAmeeting be opened, no action taken, and closed. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED April 13, 1984' PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Sale of City Property REQUESTED BY: Asst. Finance`Director Doris Hagti,g DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY' The City Council and Budget Committee have determined- the Pinebrook property and the old City Hall sites are no longer needed for City use. ORS 221.725 requires the Council hold a public hearing concerning` the sale prior to that sale. The Council 'shall disclose the general terms- and conditions of the proposed sale at the public hearing and any resident of the City shall be given anopportunity to present written or oral testimony at the hearing. Attached is a copy of the terms and conditions of the sale for your information. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1._ Hold the public hearing and authorize the solicitation of bids according to the terms attached; or 2. Hold the public hearing, authorize the solicitation of bids with amended terms. SUGGESTED ACTION Authorize the solicitation of bids after holding the public hearing and adopting terms for the sale. ® _ _. m�-- WOW- - -..� ...� PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR BIDS The City of Tigard is requesting sealed bids for 2 parcels of land as .listed below: Parcel 1: Address: 8605 SW Pinebrook Street, Tigard, OR 97223 Description: Lot 1, Pinebrook Terrace, A.K.A. Tax Lot 400, Section 11, Township 2 ;South 'Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon. Designated low density residential in sm Comprehensive Plan; zoning 4.5. Parcel 2: Address 12420 SW Main Street, Tigard, OR 97223. Description: Tax Lot 4400, Tax Map 2S1 2AB, Code 2310. Designated CBD ' in Comprehensive Plan and zoned CBD. (Central Business District). The above described 'parcels were determined by the City Council and Budget Committee as :no longer needed for city use. The terms and conditions of sale are as follows: a. The minimum price to be fixed at $37,500 net for the Pinebrook lot and $130,000 net for the Old City Hall. b. The sale will be in the form of sealed bids, in the amount of or more than the fixed minimum proceeds and will be accepted by the City Recorder's office on the date of sale. c. The sealed bid shall be accompanied by a deposit in good faith in an amount equal to 10% of the fixed minimum price. d. The sales shall be to the highest and best bidder for cash. e. The balance of the sale price will be paid in cash no later than 60 days from the sale date. f f. The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids. k A copy of the appraisal report prepared for the City of Tigard is available upon request. �. Sealed bids must be received by the City Recorder, City of Tigard, 12755 SW Ash, Tigard, OR 97223, no later than 4:30 PM May 15, 1984. If you have any questions regarding this meter, contact Assist. Finance - Director, phone 639-4171, Ext. 34. Doris Hartig Assist. Finance Director iF- PROPOSED CALENDAR SALE OF CITY PROPERTY k _ 8/15/8J Res. 83-76 ordering sale & fixing minimum price adopted Oct & Nov 1983 Property appraised + f. 4/17/84 Publish T.T. notice of public hearing 4/23/84 Council hold public hearing regarding sale of property { 4 4/26/84 Publish notice of property sale t Solicite quotes t c 5/15/84 Open quotes 9` t; 5/21/84 Report back to Council 1- HIM E, } 221.650 CITIES (2)The requirements for preparing,circulat- thereof and the same may be referred to;and ing and filing a petition and calling an election pleaded as a public statute of the state Future • . l be filed ` like manner a_nf1 under this section shall be as provided for an amendments shall UC �„�., ... - 'nitiative measure under ORS 250.265 to with like effect. 250.346, except that notwithstanding OILS (2) The Librarian of the Supreme Court 250.325;the governing body of the city shall not Library shall furnish,over his signature,a certi- consider adoption or rejectionof the measure fied copy of any document required by subsec- before submitting it to the electors. tion(1) of this section to be filed with him. He (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this shall collect at the rate of 25 cents per folio of section, if ORS 250.255 makes ORS 250.265 to 100 word3 therefor.All fees so collected shall be 250.346 inapplicable to a city,the requirements remitted by said librarian to the State Treasurer for preparing, circulating and filing a petition at the end of every calendar month, who shall under this section shall be as provided for an deposit the same in the General Fund. initiative petition under the city charter or an 221.720 Situs of cities; jurisdiction of ordinance adoptees under the city charter. cities coextensive with boundaries. (1) For (4)'The_question''of disincorporation may the purpose of the administration of all laws not be submitted to the electors of the city more relating to incorporated cities, other than ORS than once in a 12-month period. [1983 c.350 §27 221:090,-every city,shall be deemed to have its (enacted in lieu of 221.620,221.630,221.640 and 221.660)] legal situs in the county in which the seat of the' 221.630 [Repealed_by 1983 c.350 §26 (221.621 city government is situated. enacted in lieu of 221.620,221.630,221.640 and 221.660)] s(2) Notwithstanding any other.provision of 221.640 [Repealed by 1983 c.350 §26 (221.621 law'the jurisdiction and application of govern- enacted in lieu of 221.620,221.630,221.640 and 221.660)] ment of cities shall, be coextensive with the, 221.650 Property conveyed to county; exterior boundaries of such cities,regardless of cessation of corporate existence; records county lines. deposited. Within 30 days after the authoriza- 1,725 Sale of city real groper �' �' tion of the surrender of the charter,the city shallpublication of notice; public hearing;. �(1) convey,grant,assign and deliver all its property Except as provided in ORS 221.727,when A city f real and personal,and property rights,by proper council considers it necessary or convenient to conveyance, to the county in.which the city is sell real property or any interest therein,the city ,sated for the benefit and use of the county. council shall publish a notice of the proposed The city at the end of 60 days from the date of sale in a newspaPei of general circulation in the . the election authorizing the surrender shall cease city, and'shall hold a public hearing concerning to exist in it3 corporate capacity without any the sale prior to the sale. further or other formal action,and all its proper- (2) The notice required b subsection(1) of ty rights and interests shall vest in the county, y and the records of the city shell he deposited in this section'hall be published at least once i the office of the county clerk by the auditor, during,the week prior .to the public hearing j clerk or other keeper of records in the city. required,;under this section. The notice shall _ [Amended by 1783 c.350§28] state the.time and place of the public hearing ,a 221.660 [Repealed by 1983 c.350.§26 (221.621 description of the property or interest to be sold, the proposed uses for the property and the res- enacted in lieu of 221.620,221.630,221.640 and 221.560)] sons why.the city council considers it necessary or convenient to sell the property.Proof of publi- AUSCELLANEOUS cation of the notice may be made or provided by ORS 193.070. 221.710 Filing of city charter. .and (3) Not earlier than five days after publics- amendments; effect; certified copies tion of the notice,the public hearing concerning furnished. (1) All incorporated cities shall file the sale shall beheld at the time and place stated with the Librarian of the Supreme Court Library the notice.Nothing in this section prevents a a duly certified copy of the charter and all city council from holding the hearing at any amendments thereto of the city.All charters and regular or special meeting of the city council'bs amendments thereto adopted through initiative of its regular agenda. process by the electors of any such city and p art which may be superseded by other charters or (4) The nature of the proposed We and the amendments thereto may by such authority be general terms thereof, including an appraisal or / also filed in the same manner.When so fled all other evidence of the market value of the proper- courts of the state shall take judicial notice ty,shall be fully disclosed by the city council at ` I EMS ORGANIZATION AND GOVERNMEN l'OF CITIES 221.770 F ro' the public hearing.Any resident of the city shall chapter 221 or any series therein by legislative action. See rt,�nity to present written or Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation. be Alien an oppo - - oral testimony at the hearing. 221.740[Repealed by 1955 c.33§11 (5)As used in this section and QRS 221.727, 221.745 11981 c.602§6:repealed by 1983 c.216§41 "sale" includes a%lease-option agreement under ; which the lessee has the right to buy the leased 221.750 Right of cities 90 public areas real property in accordance with the terms sped- not extinguished by adverse possession or fied'in the agreement. [1983 c.216§11 statute of limitations.The right of cities and towns. whether incorporated or not, to land Neter'221.725 and 221.727 were enacted into law by dedicated to or otherwise acgaired for the public the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or:Wade a part of ORS chapter 221 or any series therein by legislative' use for streets,highways,pa•ks or public places, a:i.tion.See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further shall not be extinguished by any adverse posses- explanation. sion, however long continued. No title to such 221.727 Alternative procedure for lands as against any such city or fawn shall be hereafter acquired in this state through opera- sale �I sale ocity:real property; public notice tion of the statute o£limitations. C' and hearing. Notwithstanding ORS 221.725, a city council may adopt,after public notice and 221.760 Prerequisites for citiesin hearing,;a procedure for the sale of individual counties over 10U,000 population to re- parcels of a class of city-owned real properties,or eeive revenues from cigarette, gas and any interest therein, under a single program liquor taxes. (1);The officer, responsible for established within the city for the sale cf that disbursing funds to"cities under ORS 323.455, C class of properties.The city may thereafter sell 366.785 to 366.820 and 471.805 shall disburse any parcel under that adopted procedure in lieu such funds in the case of a city located within a of the procedure under ORS 221.725. [1983 c.216 county having more than<100,000-inhabitants, §21 according to the most recent federal decennial Note:See note under 221.725. census,only if he reasonably is satisfied that the 730[Repealed by 955 c.33§1} city meets the requirements set out in subsection (2)of this section,or if the city provides four or 221.?35 Continuation of solid waste more of the following municipal services: collection franchise after incorporation; (a)Police protection. t aathority of city.When a city is incorporated 1 after November 1,1981: (b)Fire protection. € (1) The city and the holder of any license, (c) Street construction, maintenance and certificate or franchise for solid waste collection lighting. i service within the city issued by a county under (d)Sanitary sewers. ORS 459.085 prior to incorporation may mutual- (e)Storm sewers. ly agree on continued service within the city. Planning,tonin and subdivision control. (2) When no agreement has been reached (f) g, g under subsection (1) of this section,the service (g)One or more utility services. shall continue within the city under the same (2) In the year in which any city is first terms and conditions including,without limita- incorporated and the following two years it shall tion, renewal. The city may exercise all the be considered a city for the purposes of ORS rights granted to the county by ordinance or 323.455, 366.785 to 366.820 and o prow if the governing document including the right to sus- or revoke the right to continuecity charter gives the city power to provide four pend, modify service based on inadequate service. The city u or more of the municipal servicesenmerated in subsection h o£this section. nu §§l,e may determine the types of,and rates for,servic- 21 es and may otherwise adopt regulations neces- 221.770 Revenue sharing to cities; sary to maintain the quality and extent of ser- conditions for receipt; formula for distri- vice and to protect against nuisances or hazards bution; report required from city on use to health,safety or the environment. of funds, (1) A share of certain revenues of. (3) The right to continue service under this state shall be apportioned among and dis- subsection (2) of this section is limited to two tributed to the cities of this state for general years from the date of incorporation. [1981 c.890 purposes as provided in this section.A city shall §101 not be included in apportionments or receive i Note:221.735 was enacted into law by the Legislative distributions under this section for a fiscal year Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS commencing on July 1 unless the city: 443 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23 1984AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: April 13, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:' Ordinance 84-17 passed ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: DARTMOUTH EXTEN at April 9, 1984 City Council meeting SION STREET LID No. 40 Preassessment REQUESTED BY: City Council Ordinance DEPARTMENT HEAD OKCITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY At the City Council meeting of April 9, 1984,- the City Council passed an ordinance forming the Dartmouth Extension Street LID"No. 40 that directed the preparation of a Preassessment Roll. Attached to this summary is an ordinance ,spreading the assessments for this improvement. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Construct the improvement and then assess the properties. 2. Assess the properties and then construct the improvement. SUGGESTED ACTION The recommended action would be to pass the ordinance assessing the properties for the improvement. � � ��.._r- �a«,r - G'. —.-tea, �� w�.u� �°'T�w�z •._�,.,— a ...„„. EMU— r "._ DUNN, ,CARNEY, ALLEN, HIGGINS & TONGUE JACK H.-DUNN p • WILLIAM H. MORRISON 897-1983) ROBERT R.'CARNEY ROBERT L.ALLEN t ATTORNEYS AT L/lw RALPH A.BAILEY(1902 1974) f 4 :JOHN J. HIGGINS 851 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE,SUITE 1500 THOMAS H.TONGUEPACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL BUILDING GEORGE J.COOPER,SS CHARLES..D. RUTTAN. PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 JAHES G.SMITH NATHAN L COHEN RO KENNETR K.WINGER. F. BROCK:MILLER G.'.KENNETH`PARKER, J TELEPHONE (503)2E4-Hn40 'GILB ERT.E. PARKER;JR. OF COUNSEL _ JOAN OINEILL ANDREW S.CRAIG BRAOLEY O. BAKER q JACK D. HOFFMAN April 23, 1984 JENNI FER.L.PALMOUIST MICHAEL J. FRANCIS: EDWARD J. BENETT W. RANDOLPH MILLER DICE H. BLOCK )l STEVEN STEVEN R. SMUCKER. JOHN R:-CROWELL FRED M.GRAMUM KIMBERLEE S.COLLINS GARY L.TYLER Mayor and City,Council City of Tigard' 12755 S.W. Ash Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen Re: Objections to Assessment Dartmouth Extension Street Local_Improvement, District, Tigard,'' Oregon The following are objections made on behalf of Gordon S. (Martin,' Jr. and the Martin family to proposed assessments against Martin property: 1. Consideration for adoption of an assessment formula for the Dartmouth Extension Street Local Improvement District No 40, created pursuant to Ordinance No. 84-17 is premature. (a) Adoption of an assessment formula at this time is not in conformance with ORS 223.389 and T.M.C. Title 13. (1) ORS 223.389 specifies that the City Council shall make a determination as to whether property benefited shall bear all or a portion of the cost only after the estimated cost thereof is ascertained on the basis of the contract award or city departmental costs, or after the work is done and the cost thereof has been actually determined. This criteria has not been met, therefore adoption of an assessment at this time is premature. _M1 r (2) T.M.C. Title '13.04.080 Assessment, provides that upon signing a contract or upon a determination by the City Council to make the improvements under its own supervision by purchasing the material and hiring, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably convenient, the City Council shall determine' whether the property benefited shall bear all or a portion of the cost. It shall direct the City Engineer to apportion and assess the cost making such an improvement upon benefited property within the L. I.D. A contract has not been signed or other criteria specified under Title 13 have not been met and ''therefore adoption of an assessment formulaatthis time is premature. f (3) T.M.C. Title 13.04.030 Pians and Specifications--required. The requirements of Title 13.04.030 have not been met in that the City Engineer has failed to provide plans and t l 1. specifications for the improvement. In addition, the City Engineer has i failed to specify the relationship between the proposed assessment and 1 the benefit to be derived from individual land parcels. Title 13.04.030 i mandates that such plans be avaiiable in the City Clerk's office for inspection. Such is not the case, therefore, it has not been possible for property owners to review the specifications in order to form a precise i opinion as to the benefit their property would derive from the L.I.D. ' Because of these factors adoption of an assessment formula is premature. (4) The Engineer's report does not comply with Title 13.04.080. The City Engineer's estimate has been used to establish an assessment roll. Title 13.04.080 specifies that all costs of engineering, ". superintendants, advertising and legal expenses, and also any and all other necessary and proper expenses shall be added to the contract R91 _ price. The City Engineer's report adds a percentage of 156 of the construction subtotal, designated as technical services, and five percent designated as administrative services. This method does not accurately reflect actual costs as required by Title 13, but is an arbitrary figure subject to an automatic increase regardless of actual` costs. 2. Removal of property owners from assessment was arbitrary. s (a) Four property owners originally part of the L.T.D. have f k been dropped from the assessment roll. Previous hearings have been conducted relative to formatnin of the L.I.D. Adjustments to the assessment roll are appropriate only after' a public hearing on the i . proposed assessments.' E 3. Property owners should not be assessed the total cost of the rp oject cti. rti,c.�cs- } --'- between 1-5, (a) The City will benefit from a .. and Pacific Highway. In his testimony before the City Council relative to formation of the L.I.D. the City Engineer testified that a major purpose in forming the L.I.D. was to route traffic from 1-5 to Pacific Highway. The result, therefore, is a benefit to the City of Tigard as a whole in addition to the specific benefits to individual property owners. Assessment of the total cost of the L.I.D. is therefore inappropriate. (b) The cost of the intersection of the Dartmouth Extension and Pacific Highway has been included as assessment cost. The intersection of the Dartmouth Extension and Pacific Highway, as well as that at 1-5 and the Dartmouth Extension, do not directly benefit the property owners, and the cost of those intersections should be absorbed by the appropriate governmental body. - s i i j - t (c) Traffic lights to be installed along the Dartmouth Extension benefit the City of Tigard as well as property owners within the L.I.D. Traffic lights will contribute to orderly flow of traffic through the city of Tigard and therefore a portion of the cost should be assumed by the city of Tigard. 4. The assessment roll is based upon inaccurate assumptions. The City Engineer has assumed that the Martin' family will sell certain land on the north side of the proposed street to Williams. This is not the case. Martins intend to require condemnation of any property which must be utilized for construction of the Dartmouth Extension. This includes the remaining two wedges of property isolated by the current planned street construction, a stub road, and an existing dwelling. 5. The current assessment for the Martins is not based upon the benefit to be received by the Martin' property. (a) Under the current engineer's plan and assessment roll the Martin assessment includes the cost of construction of sewer and storm drainage. Under the current plan it would be necessary for the Martins to construct their own sewer and drain systems; therefore, they will receive no benefit from proposed sewer or drainage systems. At the hearing re{ating to formation of the L.I.D., the City Engineer testified that the benefit the Martin family would receive from the Dartmouth Extension L.I.D. would be from the street and not from the .;ewer and drainage system; therefore, it is appropriate that the Martins not be assessed for any cost associated with construction of the sewer and drainage system. MOM ISO INS 6. Assessment against the Martins for property acquired-from the Martins through condemnation is not appropriate. (a) The assessment roll includes as part of the cost to be assessed against the Martins' property the cost of condemnation of the Martin property. This is not legally permissible and constitutes a taking of the Martin property without just compensation. Therefore, the cost associated with condemnation of the ' Martin property should not be assessed back against the remaining Martin property. Respectfully submitted, Charles D. Ruttan CDR:cros consulting engineers 3 GARY . BUFO D & ASSOCIATES, INC. . land surveyors f4 4 . STATE STREET • P.O. BOX 1531 • LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 . PHONE (503) 635-3511 15 N t � . April 23; 1984 Rec. No. L1087.30 i Mayor and City Council City of'Tigard f 12755 -S.W. Ash Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Proposed Assessments Dartmouth Extension Street Local improvement District fi City of Tigard, Oregon Honorable Mayor and City'Council : B k: I am a consulting civil engineer and represent Gordon S. Martin, Jr, and the Martin family in the matter of the proposed Street Local Improvement District for Dartmouth Extension in Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this letter is to make written comment on proposed assessments for construction of street and utility improvements which are proposed for construction within the Local Improvement District. For that purpose, I have reviewed the project materials presently on file at City Hall and find there are not adequate plans available to make comment on proposed assessiient for utility improvements. Accordingly, I must object to the proposed assessment for the Martin family property. The street improvements proposed are generally described and are shown in plan 4 within the Engineer's Report. Thus, in that regard, t have no objections to assessment for roadway improvements other than concerns stated in my correspondence to Mayor and City Council dated March 23, 1984, 1 enclose' a copy of that correspondence as an exhibit and incorporate herein those concerns by reference. My concerns in my previous letter to Mayor and City Council a still exist. On page three of the Engineer's Report by R. A. Wright Engineers, Inc., land that is subject to assessment is to be divided into three zones controlled by distance from the right-of-way line of the proposed street improvement and assessed at various rates within each of the zones. A zone-area type of assessment is generaly recognized as an acceptable method of assessment for street improvements. My major objection, however, to this form of assessment is that street improvements and utility improvements are both to be assessed using this zone-area method of assessment on the assumption that the land being assessed benefits identically by the construction of street, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and waterline improvements proposed for construction within the improvement district. This I find a little hard to believe and is the essence of my objections to the proposed assessment on land in ownership of the Martin family. _ ,.� i Mayor and City Council' April 23, 1984 Page:Two Perhaps the most obvious illustration, of my objection is sanitary sewer improvements construction. :If constructed in public road right-of-way through the Martin property, there are likely no problems to providing>sewer service to property on the uphill side of the roadway. The question is whether, property on the downhill side of the roadway is equally benefitted by the sewer and should be assessed on the 'same' identical: basis. There are presently not adequate plans on file at the City of Tigard to determine benefit to land in ownership;of the Martin family by,reason of the proposed utility;improvements. Without';preliminary plans for utility improvements, it is not possible to make any'positive comment or the benefit w and assessment of their improvement costs. I appreciate the opportunity to provide this information for your consideration and trust you will Consider it carefully before adopting the proposed assessment role. Sincer ,ls GAR'S M. 'BUFORD " SOCIATES, INC. Ga�y/7 Buford, P,E. , P.L.S. G B//1 sty $.�1� �eta Lail��'•'—�•®�.m msa g @¢dI swo raja war�'A Y�I.i i"�:Ti . • coni�lring eng,neeri- GARY M. BUFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. la-d surveyor 415 N STATE STREET • P.O. BOX 1531 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 . PHONE (503) 635-3511 Ma-ch 23, 1984 Rec. NO. L1087. 30 Mayor and city Council City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash Street Tigard,; OR 97223 RE: Engineer 's Report € Dartmouth Extension ; Street Local Improvement ,District City of Tigard, Oregon Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am a `consulting civil engineer and represent Gordon S . Martin, Jr . in the matter of the ;proposed Street Local Improvement i District for Dartmouth Extension in Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this letter is to summarizeconcerns which I have pertaining; CO the project as set forth within the Engineer 's Report prepared by R.A. Wright Engineering, Inc. These concerns, I believe, are suffic-iently serious that the project should` go no further` at City Council level until the areas of concern are addressed and resolved to the satisfaction of all land owners within the proposed improvement district. The improvement district must not be formed at this time. My concerns are in the following areas: 1. The single method of assessment recommended within the Engineer's Report, without consideration of service area and extent of benefit of each of the improvements, is not a fair and equitable method of assessment for the several types of improvements proposed within the Local Improvement District. The Engineer 's Report does not show that benefit has been considered individually for each ,of the proposed improvements. 2. Preliminary engineering detail and planning appears to be lacking with regard intersection design at the connection to Pacific Highway. A major roadway must be designed in consideration of comprehensive plan land use designation which will have impact on traffic to be generated by the developable property. Otherwise, land cannot be developed to its full potential as envisioned and provided for in the comprehensive plan. 3. The proposed alignment of Dartmouth Extension as set forth within the Engineer's Report does not appear to be the most responsible and functional with regard economics of future development of the Martin property, This may be illustrated by discussion of several design factors relevant land development. a. The impact of land consumed for right-of-way is significant as related to benefit. The northerly route proposed ,by the Engineer 's Report`' takes its full right-of-way width from property in Martin family ownership while providing benefit to remaining Martin family property on only one side of the roadway. Thus, the consumption of land is not related to benefit provided by the roadway. b. The proposed alignment results in' a taking of prime developable lard along the northerly line of the Martin ownership in addition to that required for 'street right-of-way. This is as result of what we perceive to be poor planning with regard land 'development, `and is certainly adverse to the best interests of the 'Martin family. C. The proposed alignment traverses the Martin property West to East on essentially a "side-hill" type of design. Specifically, land on the northerly side of the proposed roadway is, rising above the apparent street grade in a northerly direction while land on the southerly side of the proposed roadway is dropping below apparent street grade in a southerly direction. Development potential of land is compromised when it lies below the adjacent street grade as it appears that the development is being constructed in a hole. Under adverse conditions, it may become necessary to undertake signficant earthwork in filling to raise land within Martin ownership to an appropriate elevation for development. This seemingly minor detail would have major impact on development potential of the Martin property. d. The financial impact by the proposed assessment is significant, while the development potential afforded by the proposed alignment of Dartmout;. Extension is minimal. The Engineer's Report refers to net assessment, a very misleading technique of promoting a project. The only realistic and rational way an intelligent person can analyze costs of an improvement district is to look at gross costs, before payback for land taken by the L.I.D. This may be -best illustrated by citing a ' hypothetical situation wherein a total parcel may be consumed and the payback by the L.I.D. is structured to just cover gross assessment to the parcel. The net result o€ 'course would be that the land is consumed without any real payment on its value, and without any proper consideration of profit potential . 1 -2- cb kaiv _— u W P 01M 2- pall In addition, it appears the presently proposed alignment would not ,provide the same development , potential to the Martin property as it does to uphill property on the northerly side of the roadway, and may require otherwise unnecessary earthwork and duplication of improvements construction for development of the Martin property.'' Specifically, the duplicate improvements construction may include storm drainage improvements, sanitary sewer improvements and even street improvements. Additionally, if internal roadway and utility improvements are required for development of the Martin property, this may further reduce the land available for development. e. The purpose of this' L. I.D. is to open ;up the "Tigard 'Triangle" for development ; the L.'I .D. is therefore a 'vehicle to accomplish land development . Itis ,not an L.I.D. purely for the purpose of constructing needed public improvements. Accordingly, all persons involved should work together for the mutual benefit of each other, but must also be very concerned on the individual impact of 'property in their ownership. In land development:, there is no need for the construction of improvements if they do not function to maximize development potential. Our concern is that this L.I'.D. is being considered on the merit of public improvements only, and not as a land development project. There must be profitability in land development; accordingly, there must be profitability in this L.T.D. The above concerns are very real and major as they relate to development of the Martin property; the Engineer 's Report is totally adverse to the Martin interests. Accordingly, the Martin family cannot and will not agree to participation in the Dartmouth Extension Street Local Improvement District as it is presently proposed and respectfully requests appropriate action of City Council. The improvement district must not be formed as it is presently proposed. As a planning aid for restructuring, and for accomplishing a reduction in the size and scope of the present Local Improvement District proposal, and for future planning of street improvements as they affect the Martin property, we offer the following E comments: 1. From an engineering standpoint, it is our opinion the most economical and only feasible location for major roadway within the Martin property is along the alignment of the y existing creek through the property, on an approximate east west alignment; hence forth it will be referred to as the "creek route". The creek route will be most economical because it is. also a most appropriate alignment for the construction of storm and sanitary sewers through the -3 � : property. As well, it will bisect , the property into usable parcels, both north and south of the roadway, without creating unusable parcels which are a product of the present proposed alignment. The 'creek route is the only, alignment' which is acceptable to the Martin family at this time. 2. The only drawback of the creek route is that it is not feasible at this time. The Martin family has a two-fold ; reasonfor this position. a. First, the profitability must be considered in view of present economic conditions. The market potential of the Martin property ;is so minimal 'under present economic j conditions ; that the carrying,costs which could be incurred over the next several years would seriously affect the profitabilty of the development and could seriously create a financial disaster for the Martin ` family. i b. Secondly, to dedicate land for an absolute alignment of roadway without a development plan for the property is E not prudent, and would seriously compromise the ` flexibility that would be needed for a Planned Development of the land. Accordingly, although the creek route is the only acceptable alignment through the Martin property, they cannot and will not agree to participation in an improvement district at this time. The only acceptable action for City Council to E undertake would be formation of an improvement district which would bring roadway to the limits of the Martin property but no further . 3. The understanding of the Martin family during discussions and € planning of the Dartmouth Extension in the comprehensive land use planning process was that all property owners would be involved in selection of a route, and that there would be total agreement as to the alignment, the costs and [ assessments, and the timing for construction of the improvements prior to the matter going before City Council for formation of an improvement district. On those conditions, it was envisi::ned the entire roadway would be constructed as a single project. It was not envisioned that an L.I.D. would be forced on property owners. f: Accordingly, the Martin family is agreeable and does not object to a comprehensive plan amendment if necessary to allow the street improvements to be constructed in phases. In this way, the intent of understandings during the comprehensive planning process will be accomplished. The northerly and easterly parts of the roadway may be constructed now, and provisions made in order that the Martin -4- MU -IM _ x _ family may construct roadway through their property at a future date consistent and compatible with timing and planning for development of their property. 4. The Martin family is agreeable to be responsible for future' construction of roadway and utility, improvements on a creek route through their property in a future` L.I .D. on the following conditions: a. The roadway extension from PacificHighwaywould extend southerly along ,the approximate westerly line of the Williams property, and end at the Martin's approximate' northwest corner. b.' The east/west roadway alignment through the Martin property would be approximately on the alignment of the existing creek at the low 'point in the property. > C. The roadway extension from I-5, westerly toward the Martin property must extend to 72nd Avenue. d. The Dartmouth Extension at its intersection with 72nd Avenue must be centered on the south line of the Dietzman property. e. The intersection design at Pacific Highway must be studied and developed adequately to provide for traffic F. that could be generated at full development of the Martin property and other properties in the Tigard Triangle area when developed to full potential of their ! comprehensive plan land use. This is presently envisioned to require five lanes at Pacific Highway and a minmum ten-car uninterrupted curb length with no curb cuts immediately southerly of Pacific Highway, ratheri than the apparent four lane intersection which appears to be provided for in the Engineer 's Report. f . Where future roadway is within reasonable distance of a line between ownerships, the,roadway shall be centered , on the ownership line. Accordingly, right-of-way could 3; be dedicated by the property owners at no cost to the improvement district. Specifically, reference in this E regard is to the Christen propert,,,� lying westerly and adjacent to the Martin property. The Martin family must insist on this condition. On that basis, the Martin family is agreeable to dedication of right-of-way through their proerty at no cost to the improvement district. Otherwise, acquisition of right-of-way for future roadway will be accomplished internally within the improvement' district in the same manner as proposed by the present L.I.D. However, ' the Martin family is concerned on this method of acquiring right-of-way, _5 . _ MEN=- particularly where condemnation may be involved. Their concern is that ',type of cost may not qualify: for financing through Bancroft Bonding'. g, The project can proceed as a Local ' Improvement District with provision for Bancroft Bonding if 'desired. In summary, we respectfully request consideration and 'action by , City Council in accordancewith the ;following: 1. Deny or delay any action for formation of the Dartmouth Extension Street Local Improvement District in its present form. 2.` Remove the Martin property from consideration in the present Local Improvement District. 3. Authorize City Engineer to revise preliminary plans for a Street Local Improvement District which will terminate the northerly portion of street improvements approximately at .the E northwest corner` of the Martin property and the easterly t portion of street improvements at 72nd Avenue on the _approximate alignment of the south line of the Dietzman property. k 4. Take formal action to approve for the record the creek route for future roadway through the Martin property. 5. Take formal action to emphasize the importance of a properly designed intersection at Pacific Highway on the basis of development density and traffic volumes which will be realized with full development of properties within the Tigard Triangle area in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, `t s 6. Take formal action to guarantee future dedication of right--of-way by formal agreements with property owners as suggested hereinabove. I appreciate the opportunity to comment and offer constructive � criticism during consideration by City Council on formation of a very important Local Improvement District to serve the Tigard Triangle area. I urge City Council not to be hasty in considering formation of this Local Improvement District and to consider carefully the issues I have raised. i The Local Improvement District process is a very important vehicle for construction of public improvements. Its use should always consider fair treatment of all properties within the improvement district and should riot penalize any one property to advance the -6- , { efforts of a few 'which may control by reason of land area. I SUGGEST THAT IN THE PRESENT PROPOSAL', THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IS BEING FORMED TO PROMOTE LAND DEVELOPMENT AS OPPOSED TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. Accordingly, I urge City ;Council to not be hasty in taking action relevantits formation. Sincerely, GARY M. BUFORD & 'ASSOCIATES, INC. GaryUK. Buford, P.E. , P.L.S. GMB f l sw t -7- Tt+e n -x -'��.. v.:::,.vmr,.,m.. _m<.: ncet'.u'. u*sw�m.+.v..x3r,>aa...r'm WS .iTrxWt-.+.•.1'v ..ryh..-of.::.'e 34:x--�-M1'.� ix�i. ... _- _5 ^Fi 3�3 vT, �R n 'N",� b i2, i � t s i k xL 7fit;` r -FY` r. j GARY M. BUFORD & ASSOCIATES, I N C. The office of Gary M. Buford & Associates, Inc. , Consulting Engineers and Surveyors has peen established in Lake Oswego, Oregon, since March, 1971. The goal of the office is to provide a wide range of civil engineering and surveying services for each client while maintaining an awareness of the total project needs and budget restrictions. Our firm is a member of the Consulting Engineers Council of Oregon and the Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon. Both professional organizations i promote high standards of excellence for their members; we subscribe to those standards." SCOPE OF SERVICES 9 Professional expertise within our office is capable of handling a wide range of civil engineering and surveying projects. When elements of additional engineering disciplines need to be incorporated in a project we retain subconsultants'on an interprofessional basis. PLANNING - Successful design and construction of a project is dependent upon adequate planning with an engineering emphasis. Residential Municipal - Industrial Residential and Industrial Land Planning Road and Street Improvements Planning Sanitary Sewerage Facilities Planning Storm Water Sewerage Facilities Planning ` Water System Improvements Planning Hydraulic Structures Planning Railroad and Industrial Trackage Planning f ENGINEERING DESIGN -- Economical design of a project requires that information on existing conditions be accurately obtained and evaluated. Design implements the project objective while con- sidering existing conditions and constraints. Surveying for Land Development Sewage Sampling and Flow Measurement Drainage Survey Subdivision Design Planned Unit Development Design Industrial Development Design Road and Street System Design Sanitary Sewerage System and Disposal Design, Storm Water Collection and Detention Facilities Design Water Supply and System Design � n f S j Scope of Services (Continued) 17 Industrial Water System;Design E Industrial Waste Collection and Disposal Design Industrial Trackage Design I. Construction Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - A proper range of professional services during construction willassist in accomplishing a successful and cost` effective project. G Observation of Improvements Construction' Construction Surveying Liaison between Contractor and Client Project/Contract Administration Project Management t INVESTIGATIONS AND REPORTS Scope of services ranges from brief y. consultation to comprehensive studies. Consultation Expert Witness Sampling for Laboratory Analysis t Sanitary and Storm Sewerage Facilities Study Industrial Waste Facilities Study Water Supply, Storage and Distribution Facilities Study LAND AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING - A full range of survey services is available both singularly and to aid and complement other 4' services. Subdivision Surveys Lot and Boundary Surveys - Topographic Surveys a 'Aerial Mapping Control Surveys k Public Lard Surveys Coastal ?one Line Surveys Monitor Surveys/Earth and Structure Movement Mortgage and A.L.T.A. Surveys Surveying/Road and Utilities Design Surveying/Structure Design Construction Surveying E` E . i i t r, i t E PROFESSIONAL RESUME e n g i n e e r i n g - s u r v e y n g k e y p e r s o n n e l .d n �^ g G A R Y M. B U F 0 R D, President Position: Principal Engineer Principal Surveyor Education: Bachelor of Science Degree - Civil Engineering Oregon State University —1962 Master of Science Degree - 'Civil Engineering Major: Hydraulics - Minor: Soil Mechanics Oregon State University - 1964 k Honor Society Memberships: Tau Beta Pi Sigma Tau Phi Kappa Phi Professional Registration: F7 Professional Engineer, State of Oregon, No. 5624 Professional Engineer, State of Washington, No. 10020 Professional Engineer, State of Idaho, No. 4812 �_. Professional Land Surveyor, State of Oregon, No. 1148 ---t Employment Experience: (Prior to formation of Gary M. Buford & Associates) Project Engineer - Cornell , Howland, Hayes & Merryfield, Inc. , Consulting Engineers - Sewerage system study, design and construction. - Water supply, storage and distribution system study, design and construction administration. - Miscellaneous engineering consultation, study, design, surveying and construction administration. Project Engineer Wilsey & Ham, Inc., successors to Moote, Toal & Holly, Inc., Consulting Engineers - Sewer, sewage disposal, waterline and street planning, design and construction as related to land development. - Water supply, storage and distribution system, study, design and construction administration. - Miscellaneous engineering consultation, land, planning, v study, design, surveying and construction administration. ROM a Professional Resume Gary M. Buford (Continued) City Engineer` - City of Lake Oswego Supervision of Department of Engineering, City of Lake Oswego. p designand - Sewer, waterline and street planning, construction as related to Local Improvement Districts and land development. Miscellaneous engineering planning, design, and construction as related to improvements and the t maintenance of existing facilities by the Department of Public Works. Review of plans and specifications of proposed { improvements within the City. Design Engineer - -Stevens, Thompson and Runyan, Inc. , Consulting Engineers - Water supply, storage, transmission and distribution f._ system study, design and construction as related to municipal and private systemsandfacilities for land development projects. Sewerage system and sewage treatment study, design and construction as related to municipal and private M ' systems and facilities for land development projects. Hydraulic study, design and construction of water supply and storage dams, fish ladder and related facilities, and miscellaneous projects. Engineer - Southern Pacific Company -- Drainage analysis and correct-ion of problems relating to soils failures and slides. - Design and construction of track relocations and new f _ trackage including spur trackage. Field survey for construction of new facilities. p`p Professional Society Membership: Consulting Engineers Council of Oregon t Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon American Society of Civil Engineers i . American Public Works Association F American Water Works Association Water Pollution Control Federation American Society of Engineering Management 4 Project Management Institute - ; w MaNNEM am=mom%gill"I'lazzam== . m.� c OEMk "! PATRI CK R. MCD0UGAL Position: Project Engineer Project Surveyor Education: Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering Washington State University -'. 1968 Professional Registration:' Professional Engineer, State of Oregon, No. 8345 ProfessionalEngineer,'State of Washington, No. 14876 Professional' Engineer, State of Idaho, No. 2959 Professional Land'`Surveyor, State of Oregon, No. 1480 Professional' Land Surveyor, State of .Idaho, No. 2959 Responsibilities: Engineering , - Preliminary Schematic Design µ - Roadway, Parking Lot and Materials Handling Yard Design Pumping`Station and Utility Pipeline Design _- - Hydraulic and Hydrologic Computation - Project Scheduling - Specifications - Project Observation - Construction Cost Estimates - - Project Administration Surveying Survey Administration and Scheduling Boundary and Plat Computations Construction Survey Planning - Legal Descriptions Professional Society Membership: American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association American Public Works Association Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon KEITIi L. D A M A N N l i Position: Surveyor-Party Chief j Education: Business s State University of New York at Oswego - 1969-70 6 Surveying/Forestry Paul Smiths College - New York - 1970-71 - Professional Registration: ' Land Surveyor-in-Training, State �f California, No. 1618 Responsibilities: Surveying Party Chief' Instrumentman - Computations - Research Legal Descriptions ' Professional Society Membership: Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon t W man t L A W E N C E J. A N D E S 0 N Position: Engineer Technician Surveyor Technician Education: Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering Technology i Oregon Institute of Technology - 1981 Associate Degree - Survey Technology . Chemeketa Community'College - 1976 F Professional Registration: Land Surveyor-in-Training, State of Oregon Responsibilities: Engineering - Engineering Computations Roadway ,& Utility _Design Engineer's Cost Estimates - Construction Observation Surveying ?. - Boundary and Topographic Surveying - Boundary and Plat Monume.tation - Land and Construction Surveying a. Professional Society Membership: Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon s { u= ' r i t L E S E L 0 T T EE. SALMON Position: Draftsperson Responsibilities: Survey Drawings Condominium and Subdivision Plats Preliminary Presentation Drawings Construction Plans - Report Drawings } �FF t D 0 N ALD W. JONES 4 Position: Draftsperson Surveyor Technician. Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering Technology Education: College - 1983 Tit. Hood Community Associate Degree Architectural Technology Mt. Hood Community College - 1982 Responsibilities: r - Survey,Drawing Condominium and Subdivi ion Plats - Construction Plans - Roadway and Utility Design Land and Construction Surveying t _ I E f PARTIAL LIST OF PROJECTS engineering ani surveying f REPRESENTATIVE P `R0JECTS g^ . F LENTS (DISTRICT 3) - STREET IMPROVEMENTS r City of Portland, Oregon ( Street improvements design for approximately 1 .4 miles of streets in a well established neighborhood, in the Lentsdistrictof southeast Portland, an HCD street improvements project for the City of Portland. NEWELL CREEK INTERCEPTOR Tri-City Service District, ClackamasCounty, Oregon Sanitary sewer design for 18-inch and 24-inch interceptor sewer, approximately 15,000 lineal feet, to serve easterly-southeasterly pat of Oregon 'City ,and allow abandonment of existing pump station. ST MARY'S LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT City of,Beaverton,-Oregon Street improvements design for major roadway, approximately 5,700 1, lineal feet, through industrial office commercial` land,` storm drainage and utility.design, two major crossings of Beaverton Creek, and services during construction. ROCK CREEK LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT City of Sherwood, Oregon Sanitary sewer;design for trunk and lateral ,sewers, approximately 15,300 lineal feet, and waterline improvements design, approxi - mately 11 ,200 lineal feet, for industrial land in Rock Creek basin, of Sherwood, and services during construction. i- CEDAR CREEK LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT City of Sherwood, Oregon Sanitary sewer design for trunk and lateral sewers, approximately 9,200 lineal feet, for Rock Creek basin in southwesterly portion of Sherwood, and services during construction. MEADOWS ROAD LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Clackamas County, Oregon Street, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and waterline improvements design to serve office campus development, approximately 60 acres, and services during construction. WASHINGTON STREET - STREET IMPROVEMENTS City of Sherwood, Oregon Street and storm drainage improvements design to upgrade existing public facilities, and services during construction, MEINECKE ROAD - STREET IMPROVEMENTS City of Sherwood, Oregon Street and storm drainage improvements design to upgrade existing . public facilities, and services during construction. OLD TOWN BLOCK GRANT —STREET and UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS City of Sherwood, Oregon Street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and waterline improvements design to upgrade existing facilities in Sherwood Old Town, and services during construction. ;► --ate � - - WATER SOURCE STUDY City of Sherwood, Oregon Water source study for sherwood urban 'growth limits to the year 2000. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN City of Sherwood, Oregon Storm drainage study for land within Sherwood urban growth limits, an element of Sherwood's"Comprehensive Plan. WATER RATES STUDY Oak Lodge Water District Study to develop water races schedule in consideration of existing facilities and ability to;provide water service. SYSTEM PRESSURES and RESERVOIRLEVELS STUDY Oak Lodge tater District Study to consider existing and future reservoir levels for most efficient water system pressures. JANET PARK Oak Lodge Water District Design waterline improvements within Janet Park development, as 6 engineering consultant for water district, for construction by Oak Lodge, Water District. 4 THE HIGHLANDS Oak Lodge Water District Design waterline improvements within the Highland development, as engineering consultant for water district, for construction by Oak Lodge Water District. WATER SYSTEM ENGINEERING Oak Lodge Water District Design waterline improvements for residential , commercial and in- dustrial developments within water district and en(ineering con- sultation on water district matters as engineering consultant to Oak Lodge Water District. RIPPLING RIVER American Guaranty Life Insurance Company Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for design of street and utility improvements, services during construc- tion, and surveying services for platting of P.U.D. residential sub- division containing 57 single residence lots, 7 tracts for condominium development and a 9-hole golf course. t PALISADES PARK ESTATES Shelter Development Company Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for ` design of street and utilities improvements, services during constr- uction, and surveying services far platting of 118-lot residential subdivision in four (4) phases. ; E f mmm r-- m �p IF n,M1 ARRANMORE W.C. Bauman Co. , Inc. Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for design of street and utilities improvements, services during constr- uction, and surveying services for platting of 77-lot P.U.D. resi- dential subdivision in two (2) phases. 4 COLUMBIA RIVER COMMERCIAL PARK C.R. Associates Surveying services for platting of 3-lot (10 acre) commercial sub- } division. ROBINSON POINT Shelter Development' Company Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for design of street and utilities improvements, and sanitary sewage pump station and force main, services during construction, and surveying services for platting of 5-lot residential subdivision. HOMESTEAD ACRES All State Development Company Boundaryand topographic surveying, engineering and surveying services for design of street, utilities and subsurface sewage disposal facii- it'ies improvements, and surveying services for platting of 54-lot P'.U.D. `residential subdivision.' a_ KRUSE VIEW ESTATES North Shore Development Corporation Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for design of street and utilities improvements, services during con- struction, and surveying services for platting of 18-lot residential subdivision. HOLLY ACRES ADDITION The Quadrant Corporation Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for design of street and utilities improvements, services during con- struction, and surveying services for platting of 25-lot residential subdivision. VERTE RIDGE Shelter Properties Corp. s . Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying for design of street and utilities improvements, services during con- struction, and surveying services for platting of 7-lot residential subdi`dision. HALSEY STATION CONDOMINIUM Halsey Station, Ltd. Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying services for design of street, driveway, parking and utility improvements, t. services during construction, and surveying services for condominium j platting of Phase I (56 living units) of 108-unit development. MEW= WMIWMIVIMW� EDGEWATER HOUSE CONDOMINIUM Rock Island Co., Ltd. Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying services - for design of roadway, driveway, parking and utility improvements, services during construct4in, and surveying services for condominium platting of 42 living units. BREAKERS POINT C014DOMINIUM Breakers Point Partnership/W.C. Bauman Co`., Inc Boundary and topographic survey, establish zone line, engineering and surveying services for design of on-site street, driveway, parking and utility improvements, and off-site street and utility improvements, 1 services during construction, and surveying services for condominium platting of 72 living units and recreation complex in five (5) phases. SELLWOOD HARBOR CONDOMINIUM Fuhrman Land Company Surveying services for replat of condominium platting to adjust plat ( boundary for acquisition of property. i LODGE :CENTER "CONDOMINIUM/RIPPLING RIVER Bucher-Norman Constru-tion Inc. Boundary and topographic surveying, engineering and surveying services for design of driveway, parking and utility improvements services during construction, and surveying services for condominium platting of 132 living units in eight (8) phases. RIPPLING RIVER TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUM i Mecca International, Ltd. Boundary and topographic survey of project site, engineering and surveying services for design of driveway, parking and utility improvements, services during construction, and surveying services for condominium platting of 28 living units in four (4) phases. GOOSE HOLLOW VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM Silvey-Barnes Properties Surveying services during construction and condominium platting of 56 4 living units, Phase I, ( SHANNON COURT CONDOMINIUMS T. Leonard O'Byrne Surveying services for condominium platting of 7 living units. LOMA ACRES CONDOMINIUM Loma Acres Venture Surveying services for condominium platting of 20 living units. KIMBERLY COURT CONDOMINIUMS Kimberly Development Corporation Surveying services for condominium platting of 10 living units. t t {` RIVERWIND CONDOMINIUM Corporation Sardhill Properties Corporation and Cumberland Propertiesp struction and for condominium platting Surveying services during con of 9 iving units in two (2) phases. HOYT SQUARE CONDOMINIUM Hoyt Condominium Venture Surveying services during construction and far condominium platting of 24 living units. OSWEGO WEST CONDOMINIUMS Shelter Pacific Corporation, Surveying services for condominium conversion platting of 16 living units. i DRIFTWOOD VILLA:CONDOMINIUM Raymond Em Schultens Surveying services for condominium conversion platting of 52 living r f units and recreation facilities. ' TREEHILL PARK CONDOMINIUM Nu-West Development Corp. , Ltd. ' Surveying services for condominium conversion platting of 52 living units. INDUSTRIAL - COMMERCIAL SITES Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon r rvices for 500-acre St. Mary's Boundary and topographic surveying sef property, Beaverton, Oregon OFFICE CAMPUS, 'INDUSTRIAL SITES ' Broadbent Development Company i [ Boundary and topographic surveying services for 60-acre Broadbent 4 property adjacent to Kruse Way in Lake Oswego, Oregon S SAFEWAY DISTRIBUTION CENTER Safeway Stores Topographic survey of existing conditions for facilities expansion ( including trackage in Clackamas, Oregon I UNITED GROCERS DISTRIBUTION CENTER United Grocers, Inca { Boundary and topographic surveying services for office expansion, truck service center, produce expansion, cash and carry store and r freezer warehouse projects in Milwaukie, Oregon PIZZA HUT Pizza Hut, Inc. Boundary and topographic surveys for restaurant sites located in Longview, Washington; N.E> 122nd Ave. in Portland, Oregon; Foster l Road in Portland, Oregon; and including engineering design for utilities and site grading improvements at the Gladstone, Oregon site. NjutLEMaMEfaw '-- __WEED ----. - d { j FORD DEALERSHIP Ray Schultens Ford Boundary and topographic survey, minor land partition, engineering design for utilities and site grading, and provide construction services for Ford Dealership in The Da11es, Oregon j TUALATIN VILLAGE CENTER Silvey Development Corp. -Boundary and topographic survey, engineering relevant floodplain study and hydraulics analysis of existing storm sewers, for office building development in Tualatin, Oregon r P-LINE SURVEY U.S. Forest Service Survey;for horizontal and vertical control (P-line) for proposed forest service;road in Bull Run Watershed, Clackamas County, Oregon. OMARK PARKING LOT EXPANSION Omark Industries, Oregon Chainsaw Division and drainage Surveying services for construction of new parking 9 facilities -in Milwaukie, Oregon FRED MEYER DISTRIBUTION COMPLEX Clark and Groff Engineers, Inc. Construction surveying for warehouse construction in Clackamas, Oregon. STATE OFFICE BUILDING State of Oregon Boundary and topographic surveying for construction of new state office facilities in the Dalles, Oregon. ORBANCO BUILDING Howard S. Wright Construction Co. to verif column Boundary survey, mortgage survey and survey y positions, floor and roof elevations in Portland, Oregon. TIGARD HIGH SCHOOL Carson, Bekooy, Gulick and Assoc. , Mechanical Engineers Surveying services for proposed sanitary sewer improvements in Tigard, Oregon. RIVERSIDE CENTER - JOHNS LANDING M.David Paul and Associates Engineering and construction surveying services for parking and . John Building renovation in storm drainage improvements for B.P Portland, Oregon. GEORGIA PACIFIC WAREHOUSE EXPANSION Fisher, Wallin & Long, Architects Topographic surveying services for warehouse expansion - Allen Boulevard, Beaverton, Oregon 1. + C I+ i t f. i INTEL OFFICE` EXPANSION Intel Corpot-ation, ,"-loha Plant t T�,pographic surveying serviCes in Aloha, Oregon { F`,f St)LA E "i!, i1NAL R4 t_' o iD i IOt� f v ioral paiiv.av Utlli2at ,0n Corp. S i y,riQ and consulting Servlc 5 ioi" 1;11101 pct�1t10t1 - North i Miarine Drive, portland, Oregon. CO UI�IiBiA EXCAVATING CONSTRUCT ION PARD I Col.:r,j'Dia Exc..Vating, Inc. t Boundary surveying services for new Construction yard in Sh rt:ood, Oregon. { FLOATING POINT SYSTEI PLR.PIT Eh°4i;SI0N � -)an'-c C' ti'�[ctiGn Floating Point Systems, Itic. E � � ._ FoUndary and t"�pographic Survey Ing jVlC S Arid nglr rIng Cun- i SU i pati 6n for proposed p{dn expansion -i rt Beaverton, G 'egOri 84 LUItBER RLTAIL YARD 84-I_uitiber_ Company uounklary and topographic ul-Vey, engin .�El ing design for site [' orad'ing and utility itipYo �W'_Its, and ccrsultaiion relevant t land; partition for retail lumber yard in ,:ood 'Villace, Oregon. WINDJAI'i"Ea MOTEL frosts of Am-erica, Inc. Boundary and -tc,Poyt"aphic survey fGC' itiC el Ei: an510ri In i'.rV;pOrt, Orecon. G.I. JOSS DISTRIBUTION CENTER EXPANSION G.I., Joe's, Inc./Wtichael-Lake,in Architects, A.I.A. ' Topographic survey, consultation and engineering services for t utilities improvementsfor Distribution Center expansionin t Wilsonville, Oregon. MULTN314.AH COUNTY_FAIRGROUNDS Colds;ell Banker/In,:ernational Church of the Foursquare Gospel Boundary and topographic surveying services for 4�-a re tom- t mercial site in Gresham, Oregon r POST OFFICE BUILDING Chilless, Nielsen, P.C., Architects '. Boundary and topographic surveying services for post office building expansion in Gresham, Oregon. I ODD FELLOWS FACILITIES EXPANSION (I .O.O.F.) i Yodocawa, 'ticCarten Associates BI oundary and topographic surveying serviceslr_are facilities ex- �' . pansion in Portland, Oregon. f . i - BURGER KING SITE ( Chilless Nielsen, P.C., Architects Boundary and topographic surveying services for restaurant site on €€ West Burnside, Portland, Oregon. t ` $ HILLSBORO AIRPORT Port of Portland Construction surveying services for additional runway improvements in Hillsboro, Oregon P.G.E. LIBERALSUBSTATION � .. Portland General Electric;Company Boundary surveying services to establish property line at PGE sub- station property in Liberal , Oregon. P.G.E. LELAND ROAD SUBSTATION Portland, General Electric Company Boundary surveying services to establish property lines at PGE sub- station property in Oregon City, Oregon. _ P.G.E. WALLACE ROAD SUBSTATION Portland General Electric Company Boundary Surveying Services to establish property lines at PGE sub- station property in Polk County, Oregon.- ._. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK SITE First Interstate Bank of Oregon Boundary and topographic surveying services for proposed bank site, Hwy. 217 at I-5 in Lake Oswego, Oregon. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK SITE First Interstate Bank of Oregon Boundary and topographic surveying services for proposed bank site, 6th Street and 'A' Avenue in Lake Oswego, Oregon. PORTLAND FEDERAL EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION BUILDING - Bank Design Consultants, Inc. Boundary and topographic surveying services for site of credit union - building in Triangle Park, Tigard, Oregon. FLOODPLAIN STUDY Silvey Development Corporation Engineering study of floodplain limits in downtown Tualatin relevant proposed office building complex. EXPERT WITNESS/ARBITRATION John Bakkenson, Attorney Provide expert witness testimony concerning engineering in arbitration matter relevant parking lot construction, 5EffA�55a f L.I.D. No. 19 s City of Toledo, Oregon Design roadway and utility improvements for Goodard Addition No. 1 through City Local Improvement District process. OREGON BANK PARKING LOT The Oregon Bank Design ,parking lot and driveway improvements for Lake Grove Branch,- The Oregon Bank. PACIFIC MOBILEHOME_BEACH CLUB Brice Real Estate Boundary and topographic surveying, design mobile 'home development including;_street, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and waterline im- provements, site grading design, and services during construction for 139-unit mobile home park at Newport, Oregon. WOODbURN VILLAGE MOBILE HOME ESTATES i s Carl A. Bright/C.D.C. Investment Co. Boundary and topographic surveying, design mobile home subdivision including street, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and waterline im- provements, site grading design, services during construction, and surveying services for plattings of two (2) phases (90 lots) of 325- unit mobile home subdivision in Woodburn, Oregon. x: TONQUIN ROCK QUARRY Warren Brown Excavating, Inc. Boundary and topograhic surveying, and engineering design of develop- ment plan for rock mining operation on Tonquin Road in Washington County. WILCOX WEST Nick Bunick Construction Engineering consultation and report relevant design and construction of roadway and utility improvements in Wilcox West planned unit devel- opment. BETHLEHEM BAPTIST CHURCH Bob Carlson, Administrator Design study and consultation relevant subsurface sewage disposal q facilities, sewage pump station and force main, and gravity sewer , improvements for existing church facilities and adjacent properties. FARMERS INSURANCE CLAIMS OFFICE ' Glen E. Chilcote & Associates, Inc. i Engineering and surveying services for street improvements design adjacent to office building property, to City of Portland standards. t EARTHWORK QUANTITY ESTIMATES :. Columbia Excavating, Inc. Engineering services for earthwork quantity estimates for bidding . purposes. ; �a I LAKE FIR APARTMENTS Frank E. Day, Attorney Engineering services for zone change from residential land use to multi=family for apartments. UNITED GROCERS/MILWAUKIE DISTRIBUTION CENTER United Grocers, Inc. Design sanitary sewer for new warehouse facilities. INTEL BUILDING H-2 SRG Partnership Design parking, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and waterline im- provements, and services during construction for Intel building H-2.at Hawthorn Farm industrial park, Hillsboro. RESERVOIR,/HAWTHORN FARM Intel Corporation Design 200,000 gallon water storage reservoir for Intel develop- ment at Hawthorn Farm industrial park, Hillsboro. WILLOW ISLAND MOBILE HOME PARK Frank H. Laurent Design water source, transmission and storage facilities for domestic crater system of mobile homepark. E ROCK CREEK 185 APARTMENTS W.C. Bauman Co. , Inc./Nelson, Walla & Dolle, AIA Boundary and topographic survey, design roadway, sanitary sewer, waterline and storm drainage improvements, and services during construction. GREEN TEE MOBILE HOME ESTATES Pioneer Industries, Inc./Pete Wilson Realty Design'roadway, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and waterline im- provements for 85-unit mobile home park. HALLINAN SCHOOL SRG Partnership, AIA Design street and utility improvements required for construction of ( Hallinan School in Lake Oswego. WESTRIDGE SCHOOL SRG Partnership, AIA ` Design street and utility improvements required for construction of Westridge School in Lake Oswego. MASTER PLAN STUDY/FPS SRG Partnership, AIA Provide civil engineering information on floodplain, street and (� utilities improvements and consultation as required for Master Plan Study of industrial-office development, Floating Point Systems, Inc., at St. Marys' property in Beaverton, Oregon. 1 WARM SPRINGS INDIAN RESERVATION U.S. 'Public Health Service flow measurement and sampling at existing Engineering services for sewage treatment facilities on Warm Springs Indian Reservation. WORKMAN AIRPARK j Harold Workman Water source and distribution system design for 26-unit airpark- residential subdivision at Canby, Oregon. TADMOR ON THE MOUNTAIN Conservation Baptist Association of Oregon Engineering' study to develop comprehensive plan for water system improvements including ground water source, storage and distribution C acilities for camp development at 44,500 _gallons per day, maximum daily demand, and final design of water system improvements for Camp Tadmor near Lebanon, Oregon. CAMP ARRAH WANNA American Baptist Convention Design waterline improvements to existing water system, and sanitary sewerage improvements utilizing subsurface disposal techniques for existing lodge building in Camp Arrah Wanna at Wemme, Oregon. OIL/WATER SEPARATION FACILITIES ( Burns Bros., Inc. Design oil/water separation facilities for storm water system at Burns Bros. Truck Plaza in Wilsonville, Oregon. OIL/WATER SEPARATION FACILITIES I Husky Oil Company -` Design oil/water separation facilities for storm water system at Husky Oil Truck Stop in Troutdale, Oregon t. Ir s ff �. ,= - - Y 1 ' Y d !ELM —fl CITY OF TIGARD,'OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY �• 1984 AGENDA: ITEM q _AGENDA 0. . AS `Ll 23, DATE SUBMPTTED: t.l 18, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Urban Planning Area Agrement REQUESTED BY: n CITY ADMINISTRATOR: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: 1/1y'i ` INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is a draft Urban Planning Area Agreement which;has been worked out with Washington County. The Washington County Board of Commissioners is scheduled to adopt similar language by Resolution and Order on April 24, 1984. The Resolution reactivates the agreement adopted as Ordinance No. 83-33, which expired"on January 1, 1984, (copy attached) and makes modifications to ',clarify' transportation issue agreement procedures. The Resolution includes standards which should be applied to the Part;. Place project. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. The Council may approve the Resolution reactivating and clarifying the Urban Planning Area Agreement. 2. The Council may amend the agreement further. 3. The Council may take no action. P SUGGESTED ACTION I recommend that the City Council adopt the resolution as written reactivating and clarifying the Urban Planning �.rea Agreement with Washington County. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY -''AGENDA OF: , April 232 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: April 19, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: Continued from DATE SUBMITTED: P t April 9, 1984, ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Park Place Appeal REQUESTED BY: _--— DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: �� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Council conducted a public hearing on April 91 1984, on the appeal filed by ;Washington County relative to the approval by Iae Planning- Commission`of the Park Place Project. A continuance was granted to allow the applicant, the City, the County, and NP0 # 3 to discuss the outstanding issues. A meeting was held on April 16 1984, with the results outlined in the attached memo dated April 17, 1984• Based on the standards agreed to by three of the four parties involved, I feel that e Urban anning the matter may bas e resolved upon adotion f and application ofothe i1standards lcontained etherein Agreement to Park Place. modified by Reso The Council has authority under section 2with Dcondittions vthe application.ew decisions of tTheinitial hearing body and to approve, deny, approve Council should approve the application and place a condition on the approval that the applicant prepare revised plans which incorporate the design guidelines established in the resolution which reactivated and clarified the Urban planning Area Agreement. A second condition would require the applicant to submit the revised plans to the Planning Director to determine compliance with the design guidelines. -_-- --- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED The Council may: 1• Approve the application with conditions. A. Applicant prepare revised plan which incorporates the design guidelines established by resolution No, 84-_&q_• B. Applicant submit ie revised plans to the Planning Director for approval. 2. Uphold the Planning C --uission decision and deny the appeal. SUGGESTED ---------- - ------ ------- SUGGESTED ACTION - In addition, I Staff -recomends that the Council adopt alternative number one• recommend that the Council authorize a refund of 50% of the fees paid by Washington County, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mayor pro tem and City Council April 17, 1984 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development SUBJECT: Park Place Project On Monday, April 16, 1984, a meeting was held at City Hall at 7:00 P.M. to discuss the .Park Place project to reach a resolution of the City and Council concerns. Present at the meeting were: Frank Currie and Bill Monahan - City of Tigard< Kevin Martin and Tom Tushner - Washington County David Oringdulph and Mike Fain - Century 21 Homes Bob Bledsoe,, Lou Ane Mortenson, Vittz Ramsdall, Mike Smith, & Herman`Porter-- NPO #3 Beverly Froude - CPO #4 Ralph Flowers, Gordon Moore, ,Lyall Turnbull, Tony Maksym, -` Betty McCain - Citizens I explained to those present that Frank Currie and I had met in the afternoon with the County to discuss the subdivision and the Urban Planning Area Agreement. Based on our discussion, we recommended the following revisions to the subdivision. o Elimination of the "T" intersection and lots 21 and 22 o Preserve a 60' right-of oay o Construct a road with a 40' width o Stripe the road for two lanes, or no stripes at all o Take steps to reduce the access points to Gaarde, lots 15, 23, 24, and 25 as shown each have access. The number of access points should be reduced to two o The road will be designed to City structural standards TheNPOtook a vote to oppose this proposal as they did not feel sufficient assurances were provided by the City and County. The Council at its meeting on April 9, 1984 had suggested that the four parties meet to recommend a solution to the Park Place issue. Please be advised that of the four parties concerned (the City, the County, Century 21 Homes, and NPO #3) three of the parties with the exception of the NPO have agreed to the above stated compromise. 4 (405P) -- -- ----- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL-AGENDA>ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 4/23/84 AGENDA ITEM k: DATE SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:' 135th Street L.I.D. Workshop REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Mr. Gene Ginther will give a preliminary engineer's report and feasibility study for this.project. - Members of the county,staff will also be present. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED uaxr=a===caa==scsa===._a=cvc cacaaaaaa=saancaa.:a==a=a=a=aaa=c=e=os.a=aav==nc=ao=a==a== SUGGESTED ACTION '` NO ACTION REQUIRED. M WES'TLAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. OGF 'TM,1,, GOUT 7145 S.W. Varns Rd TIGARD,OREGON 97223 DATE - a JOC NO Y /% C t 1J Phone 684-0652 ATTENTION ATO C' f+Gji�:/,r{e— 40,-,-. WE ARE SENDING YOU XAttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings >( Prints i ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications Copy of letter' ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE _ 'ANO. DESCRIPTION _ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution *YKAs requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return--corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO _ SIGNED: 1,91, PMKII2M �Iu,fw4,,�n Ciul. if entionures are not DA rated,kindly notify us at ones. - — GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. P.O.BOX 233 �. ENGINEERS(PLANNERS/Sl1FtVEYORS LINCOLN CITY,OR 97367 (503)994-SQ7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE S.W. 135th Ave--/ S.W. 134th Ave-/ S.W. Walnut St. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PROJECT APRIL 17 1984 INTRODUCTION This is a summary of the larger and more detailed report submitted in compliance with a contract between Washington County and Ginther Engineering Inc. The appendix to this summary contains several sections and an LID arca map: 1. PROJECT DISCUSSION A. Project Location The general location of the project is: South of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road; East of S.W. 135th Ave; West of S.W. 130th Ave./128th Ave; North of S.W. Walnut Street. The project encompasses approximately 374 acres and contemplates improvement of about 205 miles of streets. Nearly all the LID area is within the city limits of the City of Tigard. - GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17 1984 Page 2 B. Comprehensive Plans Incompliance with State saan urban a bo rowth boundary (DGb) has been establishedto accomplish orderly conversion,of urbanizabie land to urban uses. The LID area is within the UGB. The land use plans for those portions within Washington County were established in accordance with the adopted Bull Mountain Community Plan. For those lands within the Tigard ;City' limits, the lend use plans were promulgated in accordance with Tigard:s- Comprehensive Plan. The street improvements contemplated by this LID are consistent with the comprehensive plans of Washington County and the City of Tigard C. Existing Conditions S.W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St. are portions of the same County Road (C.R. 934) with about 20° of A.C. pavement in poor condition. S.W. 132nd, S.W. 130th and S.W. 128th avenues are unimproved except for sections through Morning dill and Bellwood Subdivisions. The LID area is generally in the early stages of development. Developer confidence in the LID area is high, as indicated by the existting phases of the Summer Lake, Brittany Square and Morning Hill Developments, as well as the phases of these projects which are currently under construction. D. Project Description The project proposal is to construct streets within the LID area to urban standards that are governed by the City of Tigardappendix # 1 contains a detailed street-by-street analysis of the several cross sections to be used. rrrwaaH -&�I ��7 lfi�. �.c GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washin ton County April 7.', 1984 Page 3 E. History of Project: LID petitions were secured requesting the City of Tigard and Washington County to prepare a feasibility report to construct street improvements on portions of S.W. 128th Ave, S.W. ;13Ot Ave, S.W. 132nd Ave, S.W. 135th Ave, S.W. Morning Hill Dr. and S.W. Walnut St, as shown on the LID area map in the appendix. In October`, 1981, a. public meeting was held to determine if a feasibility report should be prepared for the project. The majority of the property owners at the meeting indicated sufficient support to warrant proceeding with that report. Washington County assumed the role of lead authority for a ' joint LID project with the City of Tigard and retained Ginther Engineering, Inc, to prepare the report. € P. Existing zoning codes: The zoning districts in the LID area are primarily residential. See Appendix #2- G. Service Providers Utility providers within the area. include: Tigard Water District, City of Tigard, Unified Sewerage Agency, N.W. Natural Gas, Oregon Department of Transportation, Washington County, Storer T.aT, Portland General Electric Co, General Telephone Co, and Tri-Met. Appendix #13 locates the major utilities in the LID area. I. Traffic A ,traffic study was made in December of 1933, by Associated Transportation, Engineering and Planning, Inc, of all streets to be impacted by the proposed district. Existing and future traffic volumes were analyzed as well as turning movements, - DINT HER ENGINEERING INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS � 5 Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 4 sight distances, traffic controls and street standards. Pedestrian and:bicycle needs and routes for 'Tri-Yet and school 1.uses were also studied. See Appendix #4 II. BENEFITED AREA A. Method of Betermiring Benefited .area: The benefited area was determined to be those properties that have frontage on the streets to be improved by the LID. Properties were also included which are in the HID area and do not front upon, but have indirect access, to a street proposed' to be improved by the LID. These latter properties will rely on LID street improvements for access. B. Description of Benefited_ Area: The boundary of the benefited area is as follows: The Northerl boundar is S.W. Scholls Ferry Road, from the est ound8ry f--Summer Lake Subdivision to the intersection of S.W. old Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. Scholls Ferry Road. The Westerly boundary is the Westroperty lines of properties rout ns� e� s7M- e of S.W. 135th Ave, between S.W. Walnut St. and S.W. Scholls Ferry Road. The Southerly boundary is the Southerly property lines of those properties rout ng the South side of S on W. Walnut St. from S.W. 135th Ave. to S.W. 128th Ave. The Eastern boundary coincides very nearly with the West and tort undar es o e-llwood Subdivision and the East boundary of the proposed Summer Lake II Subdivision and the East boundary of the proposed Summer Lake Park. The South and West E boundaries of Summer Labe I Subdivision at their intersection with S.W. Scholls Ferry Road complete the boundary of the benefited area (see the LID area map in the appendix) x GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 5 o III IMPROVEMENT COSTS TOTAL PROJECT COST: A detailed description of the .cost is found in Appendices #5A and #5B. IV. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS A. Description: Some of the proposed improvements are defined as "off-site" or "over-capacity" improvements because of location and or because the improvements are used by non-LID area traffic. Included within this category are the improvements at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 130th Ave. and the signalized improvements at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th Ave. It is proposed that the costs of these two intersection improvements will be on a shared-cost basis with the Oregon Department of Transportation. The standard residential street for the City of Tigard (34' between curbs) will be used to determine "over-capacity" h construction widerstreets.thanAny 34'Cwill beosts sociated defined ast"over-capacity"of streets costs- R. Costs for Off-site or over-capacity construction: The costs of these improvements are included in the project cost analysis shown on Appendices 5A and 5E4 C. S stemdeveio meat charges (SDC) Credits & Applications: For those properties in Washington County and specifically conditioned to make off-site improvements, the applicant may request up to 40% of the SDC be credited ,toward the required off-site improvements. GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17, 1984 Page b The City of Tigard also provides for an SDC credit at the time building permit applications are submitted for those properties that have been charged for off-site -or overcapacity costs. As with the county, the city will determine the `credit schedule in advance of need. V. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT' See Appendix #7 for a description of the assessment method and for the assessment roll. vi. PROBLEMS TO BE RESOLVED A. Rightsof Way: The rewired street rights of way have been identified by the County and City• most rights of way and most easements will be dedicated"`by` the property owners. There are some areas where additional rights of way will be added to the existing rights of way. in some of these cases, these rights of way must be acquired by purchase or condemnation. A value for purchase of additional rights of way is included in the cost analysis shoran on Appendices ##5A and 1#5B B. Sight Distances: Some instances of poor sight distance exist in the project area and will be .corrected during the design process. Those locations are specified in Appendix ##b. G. Im Movements to be Completed by Others: The Tigard Water District will extend their facilities in the street rights of way in cooperation with the project at no cost to the LID. The Oregon Department of Transportation will participate with the LID in the improvement of the S.W. Scholls Ferry Road 135th Ave. and at S.W. 1-30th Ave, and interjections at S.W. will construct other major improvements to S.W. Scholls Ferry Road at no expense to the LID. �_ GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17, 1954 Page 5 III IMPROVEMENT COSTS TOTAL PROJECT COST: ' $3,999,465.00 A detailed description of the cost is found in Appendices 0#5A and #5B. Iv. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS A. Description: Some of the proposed improvements are defined as "off-site" or "over-capacity" improvements because of location and or because the improvements are used by 'non-LID area traffic. Included within this category are the improvements at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 130th Ave. (` and the signalized improvements at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th Ave. It is proposed that the costs of these two intersection improvements will be on a shared-cost basis with the Oregon Department of Transportation. The standard residential street for the City of Tigard (34' between curbs) will be used to determine "over-capacity" streets . Any costs associated with construction of streets wider than 34' will be defined as 11over-capacity" costs. B. Costs for Off-site or over-capacity construction: The costs of these improvements are included in the project cost analysis shown on Appendices 5A and 5B. C. System development charF2 es SDC) Credits & Applications: For those properties in Washington County and specifically conditioned to make off-site improvements, the applicant may request up to 40% of the SDC be credited toward the required off-site improvements. SO GihiTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS k �r Weshinton County April 7, 1984 Page 7 Telephone, T.V• cable and natural Sas facilities will be modified as needed without cost to the LID.` Construction of a street light system and underground power is included as part of the street improvement costs. vii. NEW ANNEXATIONS TO TIGARD Approximately 1/3 of the LID area has been annexed to the City of Tigard since the original petitions were submitted. Now, more than 75 percent of the LID area ,is within the City limits. VIII. RECOMMENDATION Because of the severe problems relating to transportation and circulation in the LID area, and because of the several concerns mentioned above, It is recommended that Washington County authorize the establishment of the S.W. 135th Ave./ S.W. 130th Ave./ S.W. Walnut St. Local improvement District. Respectfully submitted, Gene T. Ginther, P.E. gtg attachments: Appendices and LID Area map i i gaff GINTNER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County 4 April 7 7, 1984 Page 8 APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX # APPENDIX TITLE PAGE NO. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 9 2 EXISTING ZONING 1.2 3 MAJOR UTILITIES IN THE LID AREA 13 4 TRAFFIC 15 5A PROJECT COST 16 513 DETAILED COST ANALYSIS 19 6 SIGHT DISTANCE 23 ASSESSMENT ROLL 24 k—g=a MSM='s0! GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. Irw ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17 , 1984 Page 9` APPENDIX #1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project contemplates the following improvements S.W. 135th Ave: i From S.W. Scholls Ferry Road to the West Road connection: Two lanes each 12 feet wide with a bike lane 5 feet wide and a sidewalk `5 feet wide on each side and a 14 feet wide left turn lane in the center adjacent`.to .the West Road connection, S.W. 135th Ave: From the West Road connection to S.W. 128th Ave: Two lanes each 12 feet wide with a bike lane 5 feet wide and a sidewalk 5 feet wide on each side and a continuous 14 feet wide left turn lane in the center; S.W. 130th, Ave: From S.W. Scholls Ferry Road to the intersection of S.W. Katherine St. and S.W. 128th Ave: Two lanes each 16 feet wide with one 8 feet wide parking lane; S.W. Brittany Square Drive: From theintersection in the center of the LID area on S.W. 130t Ave. to the intersection with S.W. Morning Hill Drive: Two lanes each 16 feet wide: with one S feet wide parking lane; ram IQ i GINTHES ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS �- Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 10 S.W. Morning Mill Drive: From its present Southerly terminus to S.W. Walnut St Two lanes'each' 16 feet side and one 8 feet wide parking lane; Major intersection improvements: S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th 'Ave: S.W. 135th Ave. will be constructed with a 14 feet wide left>turn ' lane; S.W. Scholls Ferry Road will be widened along the South night of Way to provide acceleration/decelerationlanes and to -add a left turn refuge lane. Following the relocation of the intersection of S.W. Old Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. Lower Scholls Ferry Road, an eight-phase traffic signal should be installed. S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 130th Ave: S.W. 130th Ave. will be constructed with a 14 feet wide left turn lane and will be realigned to match the existing intersection of S.W. 130th Ave. across S.W. Scholls Ferry Road to the North; Storm sewer improvements: Improvements will be made to the Storm Sewer system as a part of the street improvements; Sanitary sewer improvements: Improvements to the sanitary sewer system are contemplated as a part of all the street improvements except for that portion of S.W. 130th Ave. North of the intersection in the center of the LID area. . ^ W GIPdTHER ENGINEERING, INC:. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washinton County April 7, 1984 Page 11 Miscellaneous utility improvements: Various existing utilities such as gas, cable 7V, electricity and telephone will be relocated during street construction.- i GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS f SURVEYORS � 1. Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 12 APPENDIX �2 EXISTING ZONING The properties inside Tigard and West of S.W. 135"-h Ave. are zoned R-20 (Medium/High Density Residential) , R-12 (Medium Density Residential); and CN (Commercial neighborhood) . Incorporated lands East of S.W. 135th Ave. are zoned R-20, R-12 R-7 ;(Medium DensityResidential) ;and R-4.5 (Low Density Residential). Much of this area also carries the Planned Development (PD) Combining District. Proerties outside the city limits of 'Tigard and West of R.W. 135th Ave. are zoned according to the adopted Bull Mountain "Community Plan. There parcels are Zoned R-24 (Residential, 24 units per acre) . � .f Lim d �kkav — — ---T -- --- _ _ GBNTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS a Washin ton County April 7, 1984 Page 13 APPENDIX #3 MAJOR-UTILITIES IN THE LID AREA S.W. 135th Ave: 1. A 16" water line;along the East side, from S.W. Walnut St. to the North end of the Morning Hill project; 2. A 2" gas line along the West side, from S.W. Walnut St. to a point about 2000 feet South of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road; 3. Overhead electrical and telephone lines are along the West side; 4 A '12" water line and an 8" high; pressure gas line . are along the South :'aide of S.W. Walnut St. and extend' into its intersection with S.W. 135thve. and turn South along the East side of S.W. 1351 Ave. 5. A 10P° high pressure gas line extends through the intersection with S.W. Walnut St. to the West side of S.W. 135th Ave. S.W. Walnut St: 1. A overhead power line along the North side; 2. A 10" high pressure gas line along the South side; 3. A 12" and an 8" water line along the South side; 4. A 6" gas line along the North side from S.W. 132nd Ave. to S.W. 128th Ave. S.W. 130th Ave: I. An 890 sanitary sewer line in the centerline from S.W. Scholls Ferry Road North about 800 feet; 2. Overhead power and telephone linesalongthe West side from S.W. Scholls Ferry Road North about 800 feet. Pam GINBIER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS i PLANNERS/SURVEYORS , t Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 14 A major sanitary sewer trunk ,(Weir Trunk) is currently being constructed in the LID area. This will extend the existing Scholls Trunk, which had terminated near S. J. 130th Ave. in the swale', Westerly, along Summer Creek across S.W. 135th Ave. and then into the 'City of Beaverton. { GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS ` Washington County April 17,x' 1954 Page 15 s� 3-- .APPENDIX #4 TRAF'F'IC F- Traffic noise factors were judged to he of little significance at present, however, when traffic volumes increase in the factures there may be some increase in noise levels. The expected increase is not predicted to be inconsistent with noise levels for similar neighborhoods. t; Most police and fire response is presently provided from the Southeast direction (City of Tigard) . Since most of the present development is in the Southeasterly portion of the LID � area, ";the ability to; provide emergency ,services is relatively unimpeded. However, -future development, occurring as it must to the North and West, could cause impediments to the ,provision , of emergency services if adequate attention is not paid to E internal streets (that is, streets not constructed as a part of the LID) The Bull Mountain Plan, cited above, requires, on Pages 13 and 14, Volume X, that a Test Road connection be provided from S.W. 135th Ave. The LID plans provide for that West Road connection.. I, , ME GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS � %'Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 16 APPENDIX #5A PROJECT COSTS The variouselements of the cost of the proposed LID are as follows: 1.' Technical fees for design and construction; 2. Acquisition of rights of ways and easements; 3. Project administration for construction; 4. County legal and administrative services; 5.> Warrant interest; 6. Construction of the proposed street improvements COST ANALYSIS 1. Technical fees for design and construction: Design surveying and engineering @ 7 .5% (of construction cost) , plus construction surveying @ 2.5%, plus construction inspection @ 2%: $362,605.00 2. Acquire rights of way and easements: }sight of way boundaries resolutions (technical fees): $18,000.00 Right of way urchase (583,000 Sq. Ft. � $0.45/Sq. Ft $269 ,350.00 $262.,350.00 3. Project administration: $5,000.00 4. County legal and administrative costs (Computed @ 1% of sura of construction cost and technical fees.) : $33,843.00 k GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Wash'in ton County April 17, 1984' Page' 17 5. Warrant interest (12% for 16 months) : $295,962.00 6. Construction costs: S.W. 135th' Ave: Intersection at S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th Ave: $38,430.00 S.W. 135th Ave. from S.W. Scholls Ferry Road to West Road connection: $416,465.00 Intersection with S.W. Morning Hill Drive at West Road connection: $5,000.00 S.W. 335th Ave. from West Road connection to S.W. Walnut St: , $413,757.00 Traffic signals: $80,000.00 - S.W. Walnut St: S.W. Walnut St. from S.1d. 135th Ave. to S.W. 128th .Ave: $446,382.00 S.W. 130th Avec S.W. 130th Ave. from Scholls Ferry Rd. to S.W. 128th Ave at S.W. :Catherine St: $586,178.00 Intersection with S.W. Scholls Ferry Road: ; 20,470.00 S.W. Brittany Square Dr: S.W. Brittany Square Dr. from S.W. 130th Ave, to S.W. Morning dill Dr: $161,173.00 S.W. Morning Hill Drive: S.W. Morning Hill Drive to S.W. Walnut St $201,050.00 Sanitary sewer: $378p000.00 f` mom GINTHER ENGINEERING, IWC ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washinton'County April 17 , 1984 Page 18 Sub Total: $2 747,005.00 10% contingency: 274,700.00 TOTAL. CONSTRUCTION COST: $3,021,705.00 TOTAL. PROJECT COST (Sum of Itema 1 through 6) : $3,999,465.00 6 GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS. Washington County April 17 , 1984 Page 19 4 APPENDIX NO. 5B DETAILED COST ANALYSIS S. J. 135th Ave• i intersection' at S.W. Sch011s Ferry Road and S. 135th Ave: 14,450.00 .9 42.00/TON X 314 TONS 511 AC $20.00/TON X 122 TONS 12,448.00 211 e CR 11:35/TON. X 731 TONS 6,105.0012 CR 00/CY' X; 654 CY 3,270.00 Exc./Fill 1031 TONS 152'000.00 157.00 Shoulder 5.00/TON X Pavement Marking Traffic Control (for construction activity) 5466-66 I 9 Total: { S.W. 135th Ave. from S.W. Scholls Ferry ]toa�3 to West Road Connection: 1452 TONS b1,005.00 42.00/TON X 3" AC 17,430.00 2Fe CR 120.00/TON X 871-TONS q 8�, CR 13.75/TON X 3936 TONS 34,440.00 4 27,830 .AA Curb & Gutter 5.50/LF X 844®SyF 13A,360.00 Side $10.80/SY X Exc./Fill $5.00/CY X 7000 CY 10x000.00 Clearing $7,800.00 Misc. Tapers Storm sewersOOO.QO 100 LF Lg. Pipe @ 50 (over 24" w/ CB) 5, 2200 LF Standard Q 130 (15" to 24" w/ CB) 66,000.00 htin & Power) 86,600.00 Electric 4Lig g 10,000.00 Pavement Marking 200.00 Traffic Control (for construction activity) Total: Intersection with S.W. Morning Bill Drive at gest Road connection: 1 975.00 ea 42.00/7COI3 ?C. 47 TONS 2" CR. 20.00/TON X 28 TONS W-us 2" C $8.75/TON X 111 TONS 575.00 Std. Curb r5:OO/LF X 11+4 LF SOo.Ao Etc/Fill 00/CY X 100 CY 450.00 Sidewalk X10.80/SY X 39 SY � . 'P5 S Total: GINTHER`ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 20 S.W. 135th Ave. from West Road Connection to S.W. Walnut St: 511 AC42.00/.TON X 2957 TONS $124,200.00 2i1 CR 120.00/TON X 1035 TOMS 20,700.00 12f1 CR15.50/LF 8.35/TON X 6748 TONS 56,350.00 Curh '& Gutter X 4140 LF 22,770.00 Sidewalk $10.80/SY X 2300 SY 24,840.00 Exp:/Fill $5.00/CY X 7000 CY 35,000.00 Clearing 110,000.00 Storm 800 LF $30.00 (1511 to 2411 w/ 'CB) 24,000.00 Electric (Lights &Power) $70,897.00 Pavement Marking $8,000.00 Traffic Control (for construction activity) $17,000.00 Total: $4T5 77 U1Y, Traffic signals: (total cost) $80,000.00 S.W. Walnut St: S.W. Walnut St. from S.W. 135th Ave. to S.W. 128th Ave: 511 AC 42.00/TON X 3246 TONS $136,320.00 2" CR 20.00/TON X 1136 TONS 22,720.00 611 CR. 10.00/TON X 3479 TONS 34,790.00 Std. Curb $4.00/LF X 4260 LF 17,040.00 Sidewalk $10.80/SY X 2367 SY 25,560.00 Exc/Fill $5.00/CY X 12,000 CY 60,000.00 Clearing 110,000.00 Storm 1400 LF $30.00 (1511 to 2411 w/ CE) 42,000.00 Electric (Lights & Power) 172,952.00 Pavement marking $8,000.00 Traffic Control (for construction activity) $17,000.00 Total: $446—,3-8 1_-;,�' S.W. 130th Ave: i f. l F , i GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS l PLANNERS/SURVEYORS t Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 21 S.W. 130th Ave- from S.W. Scholls Ferry Road to the intersection of S.W. Katherine St. and S.W. 128th Ave: 3t1 AC $42.00/TON X 3207 TONS $134,708.00 2 CR 20.00/TON X 1824 TONS 36,488-00 8" CR 8.75/TON X 7890 TONS 69,040.00 Std. Curb 4.00/LF X 8660 LF 134,640-00 Exc./Fill 13-OO/Cy X 20,000 Cy 60,000.00 Clearing 110,000.00 Storm 2800 LF 30.(?0/LF(1519 to 24'" w/ CB) X84,000.00 100 LF 50.00/LF (over 24" w/ CB) $5,000.00 Electric ,(Eights &. Power) $148,302.00 Traffic Control (for construction activity) $2 000.00 Total: $5 ' Intersection with S.W. Scholls Ferry Road: 5e+ AC $42.00/TON X 140TONS 5,,880 007..0000 2" CR 20.00/TON X 50 TONS 1 12" CR $.35/TON X 298 TONS 2,490.00 Exc./Fill . 5.00/cy X 266 Cy 1,330.00 Shoulder 5.00/TON X 553 TONS 2,763-00$2,000-00 ,763.00 PavementMarking2,000.00 i 5 Traffic .Control (for construction activity) 000.00 $ : Total: S.W. Brittany Square Drive: S.W. Brittany Square Drive from the intersection in the center of the LID area on S.W. 130th Ave. to the intersection with S.W. Morning hill Drive: 3" AC 42.00/TON X 844 TO 35,469.00 leo CR $20.00/TON X .507 TONS 10,134.00 " 8e75/TON F 2150 TONS 18,$15.00 Std'.Curb 4.00/LF X 2360 LF $9,440.00 Exc./Fill 3.00/CSP X 5000 C1' X15,000.00 Clearing $5,000®00 Storm $27,000.00 900 LF X30.00 (15" to 24'0 w/ CB) 40 415.00 Electric (Power. & Light) .00 Total: ' S GINTHER ENGINEERING, tNC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County SW April 17 1954 Page 22 S.W. Morning Hill Dr: S.W. Morning hill Dr to S-W. Walnut St: 300 AC 42.00/TON X 1207 TONS 50,708.00 201 CR 20.00/TON X 724 TONS 14,485.00 811 Cit 5.75/TON X 2970 TONS 25987.00 Std-Curb 4.00/1.F` X 3260 LES' 13,:040.00 Exc./Pall 3.00/CY X 7000 CY 21,000.00 Clearing $5,000.00 Storm 15,0®O a 00 i 500 ALF $30.00 (1511 to 24ii w/ CB) 55 827»00 Electric (Power > Light) � Total: ' Sanitary sewer: ; 45.00/LF 8400 LP $378,000-00 a aaar v - GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County MPI April 17, 1954 Page 23 APPENDIX #6 SIGHT DISTANCE CONCERNS inadequate sight distance is found at the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 135th Ave. for traffic entering S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and for left turning traffic entering S.W. ;135th Ave. The sight distance for traffic from S.W. Walnut St. entering Northbound onto S.W. 7,35th Ave. is: poor. A sharp crest in S.W. Walnut St. about 600 feet Fast of S.W. 135th Ave. provides very limited sight distance. All these sight distance concerns will be addressed in the final design of the;project. l i I: s s E` i MV GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS Washington County April 17 , 1984 Page 24 APPENDIX #7 4 ASSESSMENT ROLL Methods of Assessment There are a number of methods of assessment that may be used to distribute costs of the improvement to benefited properties. These methods 'include the following: A. Front footage method ' (footage along the improvements) B. Equal <parcel C. Area of parcel D. Traffic generation - `existing T E. Traffic generation future F. Combinations of the above METHOD DESCRIPTION A. Eront footage: This method will distribute costs of the improvement to the properties abutting the improvement. This method has the advantage of distributing costs to those directly benefited. However I there are many properties that do not directly from the proposed improvements but will derive benefit from the improvements. B. EREal parcel: This method will distribute costs equally by parcel. This method is inequitable because of the wide size range of parcels within the LID area, ranging from 71 acres to 5500 square feet. l _ --- — - WOM -- _, KP - _ _ ME GINTI-IER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS l SURVEYORS Washington County April 17, 1984 Page 25 C. -Area sof Parcel:`> Under this method, costs will be distributed on an acreage basis. This method would have had merit if uniform zoning existed within the LID area. However the gide variation in zo:�ing tends to weight assessments more heavily on less densely zoned 'areas than those zoned for higher 'densities,` For this -reason, this method was discarded. D. Trip Generation - Existing: This method is obviously inequitable because there are large parcels of undeveloped ;land;and small parcels of developed land, the former generating no traffic and ;the latter generating traffic appropriate to its zone. E. Trip Generation m ruture Under this method, the traffic generated by each parcel benefited by the improvement is computed, using standard tables for each type of zoning called out in the comprehensive plan. The assessment for each parcel is the portion of the total LID expense represented by the ratio of that parcel's future traffic generation to the LID area future traffic generation. F. Combination of the Above: After testing the above methods individually, it was determined that combinations of these methods should be analyzed. Dour alternatives were evaluated. Those alternatives are: F-1. Split District Method: The LID area would be divided into two parts as if two distinct districts existed. The Westerly portion is that part of the LID area which has direct access to S.W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St. ; and the Easterlyportion is that group of tax lots in the the LID area tat have frontage on S.W. 130 h Ave. and S.W. 128th Ave. P GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April la, 1984 a Page: 26 The Westerly portion will be assessed based upon trip generation future and the Easterly portion will be assessed according to front footage. This method will distribute the cost of constructing new streets (S.W. 130th Ave. and S.W. 128th Ave.) to those parcels that front those streets while distributing costs for the improvement of S .W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St. to those tax lots that will benefit most by those improvements. F-2 . Three -way split: The LID area will be divided into three parcels and the total 'cost divided into thirds: a. The Westerly portion consists of those tax lots with direct access via S.W. 135th Aire. and S.W. Walnut St. The distribution of this portion's third of the LID costs will be based upon grip generation - future. b. The Central portion consists of tax lots that front upon S.W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St and also have access to S.W. 130th Ave, S.W. 128th Ave, S.W. Brittany Square Drive and S.W. Morning Bill Drive. The assessments for these tax lots are based upon trip generation - future. 2/3 of the third. that this portion is assessed will be spread to the tax lots accessing S.W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St, and 1/3 gillbe spread to the tax lots accessing S.W. 130th Ave, S.W. 128th Ave, S.W. Brittany Square Drive and S.W. Morning Hill Drive. C. The Easterly portion consists of the tax lots that will have principal access to S.W. 130th Ave, S.W. 128th Ave, S.W. Brittany Square Drive and S.W. Morning Bill Drive and indirect access to S.W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St. The third of the LID costs assigned to this portion will be svread based upon trip generation - future. 2/3 of uhe third will spread among the lots 'raving principal access to S-W. 130th Ave, S.W. 128th Ave, S.W. Brittanyy Square Drive, and S.W. morning Hill Drive and 1/3 will be spread among the lots remaining in the portion. GINTHER ENGINEERING, INC.= lop ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS Washington County April 17, 1954 Page 27 F-3. Tri} Generation - Future: All parcels will be assessed according to future trip generation. F-4. ' Trip Generation - Future & Front Footage: a. All tax lots in the LID area will be assessed based upon future trip generation for the improvement of S.W. 135th Ave. and S.W. Walnut St. b. All rax lots having frontage on S.W. 130th Ave. and S.W. `125th Ave will be assessed on a front foot basis for the costs of those streets. Comparison of Alternatives: The 'alternative assessment methods were evaluated for all the tax lots in the LID area. The results of that evaluation are shown in Table #1 The above evaluation indicates that Alternative #4 appears to be an equitable means of distributing costs for the following reasons: 1. The entire LIPS area will benefit from improvements to S.W. 135th Ave, and S.W. Walnut St. 2. parcels benefitting from construction of S.W. 130th Ave. and S.W. 128th Ave. will be assessed on a front footage basis. 3. Already developed subdivisions will be assessed for S.W. 135th Ave., and S.W. Walnut St. based upon trip; generation - future. 4. .Alternative #4 recognizes that existing development is already contributing traffic and will not be adding future traffic loading. GiNTHER ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS &Tashinton County April 17, 1984 Page 28 5. alternative #4 shifts more of the assessment burden to those currently undeveloped tax lots, because the undeveloped land will contribute more future loading than the currently developed land. 6. alternative #4 requires a method of payment that ,is based more precisely upon benefit received by the tax lots than the other methods considered. Improvement to Value Test: Resolution and Order #82-194,provides alternatives to ORS 223.220 11Standards for Acceptance;to Applications." One of the alternatives is the "Improvement to Value Test." An appraisal is to be performed by an independent certified appraiser prior to the time of submitting the installment application. The appraisal will establish the likely value of the subject tax lot after the improvements are completed. The value at the time theimprovementsare completed must be not less than Z00% of the total assessments that will be outstanding against the tax lot. Table #2 shows the estimated assessed value of the LID area tax lots after the improvements are completed. The assessed value computed for that time is a most conservative value, as it was computed by merely adding the value of the assessment plus any existing, recorded assessments to the pre-LID assessed value. Certainly the resulting assessed value of the LID area will be enhanced well beyond this value, but this value does give a most conservative value against which to measure the 200% requirement The sanitary sewer has been assessed on a front footage basis for the tax lots that abut the streets in which the sewers are to be installed. This method of assessment is equitable because the sewers to be OVA M installed are not trunk sewers but are local collector sewers. TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF ASSEVIENT METHODS PAGE 1-1 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX TAX METHOD METHOD METHOD METHOD No. 4 MAP h�0. 3 LOT N0. 1 H0. " s 151-33A 300 S506,943-93 $823,796.35 $505,343.93 $405,000-2626 1S1-33RD 2100 $13,479.67 $12,211.43 $13,479.57 #45}059.64 1513 AD 2200 $13,479.67 #12,2!1.43 $13,479.67 $45,546.35 1S1-33C 100 $249756.62 #16,644.24 $24,156.62` #15,707.43 151 33C 101 $12,360.60 $9,304.41 $12,360.60 $7,8336.03 151-3?C 102 $14,104:24 $9,526.11 $i4,104.24` $8,99?,45 F 151-33C 103 $29,662.36 $20,864.01 $29,562.36 $17,849.04 .f ]SI33C 104 $36,621.17 $25,347.35 $36,621.17` #24,045.53 151-33C 105 $12,360.60 $9,304.41 $12,360.60 #7;836.03 ISI-33C 106 $12,360.60 $3,304,41 $12,360.60 $7,,836.03 151-330 107 $24,570.99 $16,519.26 $24,570.99 $$15,588.39 1S1-33C 108 $12,360.60 $8,304,41 $12,360.60 $7,836.03 151-33C 900 $72,348.00 $43,917.81 $72,843.00 34 ,577,17 � i5l-33C 1000' $882,418.00 #531,982.59 $832,419.00 $491,516.97 1 15133D 100, $260,311.35 $242,768.07 $260,3]!,36 $609,307.22` 1S1-330 200 $80,681.03 $73,090.11 $90,681.03 $226,862.57 1S1-33D 300 $89,906.04 $144,593.54 $89,906.04 5143,550.54 iSl-33D 400 $4,116.11 $3,105.16 $4,116.11 #2,292,72 °51-33DA 100 $6,385.59 $5,785.16 $5,385.99 $71,647.61 ISI-330A 7200 $31,228.31 $28,290.17 $31,228.31 $17,394.53 151-33DR 7300 $4,116.11 $3,728.85 $4,116.11 $2,292.72 ISI-33DC 100 $79,553.80 $112,521.01 $79,553.80 $230,576.43 ISI-33DC 200 $7,643.60 $6,451.74 $7,643.60 $5,493.91 iSi-333C 300 $27,925.69 $41,899.80 $27,925.69 $53,680.51 ISI-33DC 400 $9,675.57 $8,169.19 $9,675.57 $6,958.61 151-33DC 500' $125,080.14 $188,675.73 $125,090,14 $170,239.49 151-33DC 600 $1,919.76 $1,372.81 $1,919.76 $1,013.62 ISI-3300 700 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 151-33DC 800 $952.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 151-33DC. 801 $962.83 $726.35 8962.83 $536.31 IS!-33DC 900 $962.33 $726.35 $962.93 $536.31 151-33DIU 1000 $962.83 $726,35 1962.83 $536.31 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 151-33DC 1100 $962.93 161-330C 1200 $962.63 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 36.31 IS!33DC 1300 $962.83 $726.35 $962,83 $536 .31 ISI-33DC 1400 $962.83 $726.35 #962.83 -151-33DC: 1500 $962.83 $726.35 $962.33 $536.31 1S1-330C 1600 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.331 131-33DC 1700 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 BI-330C '1800 $962.83 1S1-33DC 1900 $962.83 $726,35 ;962.83 $536.31 $9b2.E3 372635 $962.83 $536.31 ISI.33 . DC 2000 $962.83 $536.31 r' 151-UDC 2100 $962.83 $726.35 �. ISI-33DC 2200 $962.83 $726.35 #962.83 $536.31 ISI-333DC 2300 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 ISI-33DC 2400 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 ISI-33DC 2500 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 15]-33DC 2600 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 ISI'33DC 2700 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $`536.31 IS!-33DC 2800 $962.83 $726.35 $762.83 $536.31 PAGE 1-2 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX TAX METHOD METHOD ' METHOD METHOD MAP : . i 1iD. 2 ;1D. 3 No. 4 DT MO j�'b{��fx�•�*��+ta�c•�r•��x�tt353n�3�� : $962.33 tSl :�3DC 2900 $96.8. $536.31 596z.8 s726.35 f962.a� 151-33DC` 3000 $726-'15 $962.33 5536.31 IS1-3 3CC 3100 $962:73 $535.31 3 r $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 ISI3K 3200 ;726.35: $962.83 5536.31 1St 33DC' 3300 $962.83 $536.31 152-33DC 3300 $962.53 $726.35 $962.83 $952.83 $126.35 x962.83 5536.31 151-33DC 3500 $536.31 _ FSI-33DC 3600 5962.53 $726.35 $96'.83 $536.31 $962:33 $720.35 $96_.83 151-330C 3740 $962.33 $536.31 iSt 330C 3800 $962.83 1726.35 z $726.35 $962.83 3536.31 191- 3t�C 3900 $962.8 $726.35 $962.93 $536.31 ISI-33➢C 4000 , $962.83 $962.83 $536.31 r 4 $96253 ISI-331. 1Q4 . 1726.35$566.5b $751.01: 3418.32 IS1'33DC 4304 $751.01 $566.56 $151.01.' $418.32 ISI-33DC 4400 $;51.41 $418.32 $566.56 $75Y.01 IS1-33DC 4544 $751.01 $ 66.55 $75 1.41 $418.32 151-3W 4600 $751.01 1418.32 1S1-33DC 4700 $751.01 $566.56 1412.32 $751.01 $566.5.5 $751.01 151-33➢C 4800 $556.56 $751.01 $418.32 1S1-33DC 4900 3751.01 $418.32 $751.01 $566.56 $751.01 - 1S1-33DC 5100 $751.01 $418.32$566.56 151-33DC 5100 $751.01 IS1-33DC 5200 $751.01 1566.56 $751.01 $418.32 $566.56 $751.01 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5340 $751.01 $751.01 $418.32 151-33DC 5400 $751.01 $556.56 1566.55 $151.01 $419.32 ISI-330C 5504 $751.01 $418.32 $751`.01 $556.55 $751.01 ISI-,IDC 5640 $566.56 $751.01 $419.32 ISI-33DC 5700 $751.01$751.01 $418.32 $556.56 $751.41 151-33➢C 5804. 1566.56 $751.01 1418.32 IS1�3DC 5900 $751.01 $418.32 $751.01 $556.56 $751.41 151-33DC 6000 $566.56 3751.01 $418.32 1St-33DC 6100 $751.01 55418.32 $75 $566.56 $75101 151-33DC b20Q $7511.4141 $566.56 1751.41 $419.32 151-33DC 6300 . 3751.01 $418.32 1S1-33DC 6400 $751.41 $566.55 $566.56 S-151-01 $418.32 151-33DC 6500 $751.01 ' $751.01 $566.56 $151.01 $418.32 ISI-33DC 6600 $566.56 $751.41 $418.32 151-330C 6700 $751.41 $418.32 151-33DC 6800 $751.01 $566.56 $751.01 251-4A 541 3590,559.83 $917,994.75 $590,559.93 $639,3x1.41 251-4A 592 $46,750.55 $61,294.14 $46,750.55 $117,296.95 251-4A 573 $6,759.09 $5,099.00 x6,739.09 $1,764.89 ,124.77 $10,655.61 $14,124.77 2S1-QA 504 $14 57,867.66 251-4A 600 $12,445 7 2 $x,757.90 $12,405.72 $8,336.68 37 $5,119.31 "2S1-4A 700 $6,117.37 $5,222.63 $6,117. 251-4A 800 $3,373.59 $2,299.67 $3,373.69 $2,164.49 251-44 802 $4,569.29 13,777.79 $4,569.29 $3,636.39 251-4A 844 $5,345.86 $4,221.94 $5,801.98,305-96 $3,421.93 t 291-4A 900 $51801.99 $3,669.33 - - - -- - 9 PAGE 1-3 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TAX TAX. METHOD P,ETNOD METHOD METH GD MAP LOT ND. i ND.'-2 NO. 3 N0. 4' 251-4A 901 $5,458.88 $4,254.41 $5,4u3.9°. $4,115.32 2S L-4A8 100 $11,915.07 $7,183.2: $11,915.0-7 $6,6338.-S-) 251-408 200: $962.83 .$726.35 :952.83 $,36.31 2S1-4A8 300 $962.83 $720.35 $762.83 $536.31 2S1-4A8 400 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 251-4A8 500 $902.93 $726.35 x962.83 $536.31 251-4A8 600' $952.83 $726.35 $9762..83 $536.31 251-4A8 700 $462.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 251-4AD 800` $962.83 $725.35 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4A8 900 $962.83 $726.35 $962.93 $536.31 291-4AD 1000 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $535.31 251-4A8 1100 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4AD 1200 $952.93 $726.35 $952.83 $536.31 2S1.4AD 1300 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536:31 2S1-4A9 1400 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4A8 1500 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $535.31 2S1-4A$ 1600 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4A8 1700 $962.83 $726.35 $962.63 $536.31 2S1-4AD 1800 $962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $53o.31 251-4A8 1900 3962.83 $726.35 $962.83 $536.31 251-4AD 2400 $2,079.72 #1,253.80 $2,079.72 $1,158.43 251-4AD 2500 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4AD 2600 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4AD 2601 $962.83 $580.46 '$962.83 $536.31 257-4AD 2700 $962.83 $580.46 $962.03 $536.31 2S1-AAD 2800 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 5536.31 2S1-4AD 2801 $962.83 $590.46 $962.83 $536.31 2z1-GAD 2900 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 $536.31 201-4AD 3000 $962.03 $580.46 $962,83 $536.31 261-4AD 3100 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 $536.31 251-4AD 3200 $962.03 $580,46 $962.83 $536.31 251-4AD 3300 $962.93 $580.46 $962.83 $536.31 291-4AD 3301 $962.83 $590.46 $962.83 $536.31 2S1-4AD 3400 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 $536.31 251-4AD 3501 $962.83 $580.46 $962.83 1536.31 291-AAD 460() 1962.83 4580.46 $962.83 $536.31 251-48 100 $16,931.53 $10,207.50 $16,931.53 $9,431.05 251-4D 101 $750,090.96 $459,709.44 $750,090,96 $426,178.38 251-4DD 100 $962.83 $580.46 $91.2.83 $536.31 251-480 3800 $15,467.14 $11,251.50 $15,467.14 $10,764.71 251--48D 3900 $13,069.10 $9,421.28 $13,0.9.10 $9,000.06 2S1-48D 4000 $4,976.76 $3,172.06 $4,978.76 $2,963.43 ._ $3,999,355.00 $3,999,355.00 -$3,999,355.00 $3,999,355.00 TABLE 2 SEWER AND STREET ASSESSMENTS (ASSESSMENT METHOD 4) t RAGE 2-1 FRONTAGE+ ASSESSMENT 'ASSESSMENT TO FUR FOR TAX TAA SANITARY SANITARY STREET TOTAL MAF LOT SEWER SERER IMPROVEMEITS ASSESSMENT *f***4*F*f*4f**f f***1*******t**f**+t&fz4ff }*Ef F*4*f#***ff*iff*f****}fss** ISI-33A 300; 1,250.00 $26;835.72 $318,164.54 $405,000.26 151-33AD 2100 $0.00 $45,069.64 $45,069.64 151-33AD 2200 $0.00 $461546.35 $46,546.35 151-33C 100201.65' $4,329.14 $11,37"•8.34 $15,707.49 1S1-33C 101 100.00 $2,146.96 15,689.11 $7,836.03 ISI-331 102 120.00 32,576.23 $6,421.23 $9,99/.46 ISI-33C 103- 349.70 $7,507.56 $112,340.48 $19,848.04 151-33C 104 383.49 $9,232.53 $15,811.55 324,:+4x.5.3 151-33C 105'> 100.00 #2;146.86 $5,659.17 $1,936.03 151-33C 106` 100.00 12,146.86 $5,659.17 $7,836.03 1S1-33C 107 200.00 $4,293.72 $11,294.69 $15,588.39 151-33C 108 100.00 S2,1146.36 $5,689.17 $7,936.03 151-33C 900' $0.00 $40,577.17 $40,577.17 ISI-33C 1000 $0.00 $491,516.97 $491,516.97 151-33D 100` 3,440.00 $73,851.90 $535,455.32 $609,307.22 ISI-33D 200 $0.00 $226,862.57 $226,862.57 ISI-33D 300 330.00 $7,084.63 $136,466.31 $143,550.94 1S1-33D 400 $0.00 $2,292.72 $2,292.72 �. ISI-33DA 100 $0.00 $71,647.61 $71,647.61 1S1-33DA 7200 $0.00 317,394.53 $17,394.53 1S1-33DA 7300 30.00 32,292.72 $2,292.72 1S1-33DC 100 1,330.00 $29,626.63 1200,949.95 $230,576.4t3 151-33DC 200 130.00 $2,790.91 $2,703.00 $5,493.91 151-33DC 300 315.00 $6,762.60 $46,917.91 $53,690.51 1S1-33DC 400 165.00 $3,542.31 $3,416.29 $6,958.61 ISI-33DC 500 1,340.00 $28,767.89 $141,471.59 $170,239.49 161-33DC 600 $0.00 $1,013.62 $1,013.62 ISI-33DC 700 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 800 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 1S1-33DC 801 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 900 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 1000 $0.00 $536.3I $536.31 151-3.3DC 1100 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 1S1-33DC 1200 $0.00 $536.31 35.36.31 151-33DC 1300 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 1400 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 SSI-33DC 1500 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 1600 $0.010 3536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 1700 $$0.06 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 1800 $0.00 $536.31 $535.31 1S1-330C 1900 $0.00 3536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 2000 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 2100 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 2200 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 1St-33DC 2300 $0.00 $536.31 $ 36,31 161-33DC 2400 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 2500 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DC 2600 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 2700 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 151-33DCC 2800 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 s - --- -� -„ WE FADE 2-2 FRO`lTASE ASSESSMENT ' ASSESSMENT TO FOR FOR TAX TAX SANITARY SANITARY STREET TOTAL MAP LOT SEWERSEWER IMPROVEMENTS 'ASSESSMENT ISI-33DC 2900 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3000 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3100 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3200 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3300 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ' ISI-33DC '3400 $0.00 $536.32 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3500 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3600 $0.00` $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3700 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3800 $0.00' $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC 3900 $0.00 $536.31' $536.31 1S1-33DC 4000 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 ISI-33DC -4100 $0.00` $536.31 ' $536.31 IS1-33DC '4300 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 4400 $0.00 $418.32', $418.32 151.-33DC 4500 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 4600 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 4700 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 f 151-33DC 4800 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 151-33DC 4900 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5000 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 iSl-330C 5100 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5200 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5300 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5400 $0.00 $418.32 $416.32 ISI-33DC 5500 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DE 5600 $0.00 $410.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5700 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 151-33DC 5800 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 5900 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 151-33DC 6000 0.00 $418.32 $416.32 151-33DC 6100 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 6200 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32` ISI-33DC 6300 $0.00 $418.32 $418,32 ISI-33DC6400 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32- _ISI-330C 6500 $0.00 $418.32 $416.32 151-33DC 6600 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 1S1-33DC 6700 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 ISI-33DC 6800 $0.00 $418.32 $418:32 251-4A 501 4,410.00 $94,676.42 $544;704.99 $639,381.41 2S1-4A 502 1,152.39 $24,740.17 $92,556.77 $117,296.95 291-4A 503 $0.00 $3,764.89 $3,764.88 2S1-4A 504 $0.00 $7,867.66 $7,867.66 (� 2S1-4A 600 150.00 $3,220.29 $5,116.39 $8,336,68 251-44 700 180.00 $3,664.34 $1,254.96 $5,119.31 .C:l.i-9A BVV -.;D.i�U $644.U6. $1,520.44 $2,164.49 251-4A 802 120.00 $2,576.23 $1,110.16 $3,606.39 251-4A 804 120.00 $2,576.23 $1,520.44 $4,096.67 2S1-4A 900 20.00 $429.37 $2,992.61 $3,421.98 291•-4A 901 113,00 $2,425.95 $1,689.37 $4,115.32 PSI i - _ _ --- _ Em Oil PAGE 2-3 FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESS"ENT TO FOR FOR TAX TAX SANITARY SANITARY STREET TOTAL NAP LOT SEWER SERER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT- 251-4AB 100 $0.00 $6,636.83 $6,636.63 251-4AD 200 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AB 300 $0.00 $536.31 $5,16.31 2S1-4AB 40050.00 .536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AB 500- $0.00 #536.31 $536.31 2SHAB 600 $0.00 8536.31 $536.31 231-4AB 700 $0.00 $536.31 45,36."1 2S1-4AB 800 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2SI-40 900 $7.00 3536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AB 1000 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 251-4AB 1100 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 251-4AB 1200 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AB 1300 $0.00 8536.3! $536.31 251-4A8 1400 $0.00 ;536.31 $536.31 251-4AB 1500 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AB 1600 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2SI-4AB 1700 $0.00 $5,36.31 $536.31 2S1-4AB 1800 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 e 2S1-4AB 1900 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4"'D 2400 $0.00 $1,158.43 $1,158.43 2SI-4AD 2500 $0.00 $536.31 #536.31 2S1-4AD 2600 $0.00 $536.31 $26.31 2S1-4AD 2601 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2SI-4AD 2700 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 251-4AD 2604 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 2801 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 2900 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 3000 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 251-4AD 3104 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 3200 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 251-4AD 3300 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 3301 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 251-4AD 3400 $0.00 3536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 3501 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2S1-4AD 4600 $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2SI-49 100 $0.00 $9,431.05 $9,431.45 2S1-4B 101 8$0.00 $18,892.35 $407,286.04 $426,178.36 2S1-4BD 100 • . $0.00 $536.31 $536.31 2Si-487 3800 226.00 $4,851.90 $5,912.81 $10,764.71 2S1-4BD 3900 180.90 $3,883.67 -$5,116.39 $9,000.06 2S1-4BD 4000 20.00 $429.37 $7,534.06 $2,963.43 r 17,607 13 $375,000.00 $3,621,355.40 $3,999,355.04 p, c Amin TABLE 3' COMPARISON OF MARKET VALUE AND ASSESSMENTS (COh1PARISON WITH ORS 223.220 AND R&0 82-194) PAGE 3-1 CURRENT TOTAL POST LID ASSESSMENT ASSESSED ASSESSMENTS ASSESSED PERCENTAGE TAX TAX 1ARYET NOT THIS TOTAL MARKET OF MARKET HAP LOT VALDE LID ASSESSMENT VALUE VALUE 191-103A 300 $644,170.00 ;:4055000.26 $1,049,170.26 259.05% 151-331D 2100 $0.00 $451069.64 $45,069.64 100.00% ISI-33RD 2200 $135,700.00 $46,546.35 $192,246.35 391.547 151-33C 100 $76,400,00 $151707.48 $92,107.49 586`.39% ISI-33C 101 $16,000.00 $7,836.03 $23,836.03 304.19% ISI-33C 102 $116,300.00 $9,497.46 $125,297.46 1,342.597 SSI-33C 103 $133,800.00 $19;848.04 $153,648.04 774.12% 151-33C 104 .27,800.00 $24,045.53 $51,845.53 215.61% 1S1 33C 105 $16,000.00 $7,836.03 $23,836.03 304.19% 151 33C 106 $16,000.00 $7,836.03 $23,836.03 304.197 ISI-33C 107 $23,100.00 $15,588.39 ': ;38,688.39 245.197 151-33C 108 $16,000.00 $7,936.03 $23,836.03 304.197 151=33C 900 $108,300.00 140,577.17 $148,077.17 366.907 151-33C 1000 $615,552.00 $491,516.97 $1,107,068.97 225.24% ISI-331) 100 $666,200.00 $609,307.22 $1}275,507.22 209.347 ISI-33D 200' $299,300.00 $226,862.57 $526,162.57 231.937 1S1-33D 300 $171,900.00 $1435550.94 $315,450.94 219.751 ISI-33D 400 $40,600.00 $2,292.72 $42,892.72 -1,870.82% ISI-33DA 100 $141,100.00 $71,647.61 $212,747.61 296.941 191-33DA 7200 $242,549.00 $17,394.53 $259,943.53 1,494.407. 1S1-33DA 7300 . $89,100.00 $2,292.72 $91,392.72 3,986.21% 151-33➢C 100 $103,600.0G $230,576.48 $334,176.48 144.937. 1S1-33DC 200 $07,200.00 $5,493.91 $92,693.91 1,687?1X ISI-33DC 300 $58,700.00 $53,680.51 $112,380.51 209.35% 151-330C 400 $845800.00 $6,958.61 $91,758.61 1,318.637 191-33DC 500 $434,300.00 $170,239.48 .11604,539.48 355,11% ISI-300C 600 $27,926.00 $1,013.62 $28,939.62 2,855.067 1Si-33DC 700 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.927 1S1-33DC 800 $12,600.00 $536.31 $13,136.31 2,449.39% 151-331)C 801 $12,600.00 $536.31 $13,136.31 2.449.39% ISI-33DC 900 389,200.00 $53 .31 $89,736.31 16,73?..19% ISI-33DC 1000 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.92% ISI-330C 1100 $18,100.00 $536.31 318,636.31 3,474.921 ISI-33DC 1200 $19,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.92% 151-33DC 1300 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.927 ISI-33DC 1400 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.92% 151-33DC 1500 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.927. 151-33DC 1600 $18,100.00 $536.31 518,636.31 3,474.92% ISI-33DC 1700 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.927 ISI-33DC 1800 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.927 191-33DC 1900 $94,400.00 $536.31 394,936.31 17,701.78% ISI-33DC 2000 $74,500.00 $536.31 $75,036.31 13,991.237 ISI-33DC 2100 $85,200,00 $536.31 $85,736.31 15,986.357. 151-33DC 2200 $85,400.00 $536.31 $85,935.31 16,023,64% 1S1-33DC 2300 $89,600.00 $536.31 390,136.31 16,806.77% 151-33DC 2400 $91,600.00 $536.31 $92,136.31 17,179.69% 151-33DC 2500 $99,900.00 $536.31 $100,436.31 18,727.312 151-33DC 2600 $99,900.00 3536.31 $100,436.31 18,727.31% 1S1-330C 2700 $90,500.00 $536.31 391,036.31 16,974.59% 191-33DC 2800 $91,800.00 $536.31 $92,336.31 17,216.98% = o , PAGE 3-2 CURRENT TOTAL POST LID ASSESSMENT ASSESSED ASSESSMENTS ASSESSED PERCENTAGE TAX TAX MARKET NOT THIS TOTAL MARKET OF MARKET HAP LOT VALUE LID ASSESSMENT VALUE VALUE ISI-33DC 2900 886,800.00' $53b.3t $87,336.31 16,294.69% 1S1-33DC 3j00 $91,500.00 $536.31 59 ,Ov6.3i 17,161.05" 1S1-33DC 3100 5101,000.00 $536.31 8101,536.32 18,932.41% IS1-33DC 3200 $$92,400.00 $536.31 $92,936:31 17!329.86% $110 400:00 $536.31 $110,936.31 20,585.13% 151-33DC 3040 ! $536.31 $35,836.31 6,692.02X 151-33DC 3404 $35,340.00 151-33DC 3500 $97,200.00 $536,31 $97,736.31 18,223.97% 1S1-33DC 3600 $101,500.00 $536.31 $102,036.31 19.025.64% 151-33DC 3700 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3,474.92% 151-33DC 3800 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636.31 3, 74.92% 1S1-33DC 3900 $60,700.100 $536.31 $61,236.31 11,418.09% 151-33DC 4000 $18,100.00 $536.31 $18,636,31 3,474.94% $1S 100.00 $536.31 $18 630.',1 0,474.9..% IS1;3DC 4100 ! iSl;3DC 4300 80.00 3418,32 $419. 2 100.00% ISI-33DC 4400 0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% $ 1S1-33DC 4500 $0.$10 $418.32 $418..3.2 100.04% m iSi-331C 4600 $0.00 $416.32 ' $418.32 .100.407. . .. 1S1-33DC 4704 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.04% ISI-33DC 4800 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% ISI-3DC 4900 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% iSi-33DC 5000 $0.00 41418.32 $413.32 100.001, ISI-33DC 5100 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% 151-33DC 5200 $0.00 $418.3 $418.32 100.00% 1S1-33DC 5300 0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% 161-330C 5400 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% 1SI-33DC 5500 $0.00 $419.32 $418.32 100.00% 1S1-33DC 5600 $0.00 $413.32 $418.32 100.00% 1S1--33DC 5700 $0.00 $418.32 3418,32 100.00% 151-33DC 5800 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00X ISI-33DC 5900 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.09X ISI-33DC 6000 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.001 151-33DC 6100 $0.00 $418.32 $416.32 100.007, iSl 33DC 6200 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.007 iSl-3)DC 6300 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.001 151;3DC 6400 $0.00 $418.32 #418.32 100.00% 1S1-33DC 6500 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00'L 1S1-33DC 6600 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% 151-33DC 6700 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.04% ISI-33DC 6800 $0.00 $418.32 $418.32 100.00% 251-4A 501 $768,000.00 $639,381.41 $1,407,381.41 220.12% 251-4A 502 191,400.00 $117,296.95 $208,696.95 177.92% 251-4A 503 $28;100.00 $3,764.89 $31,864.89 846.37% 2S1-4A 504 $59,700.00 $7,867.66 $66,567.66 846.091 2S1-4A 600 $62,700.00 $8,336.68 $71,036.68 852.10% 291-4A 700 $43,900.00 $5,119.31 $49,019.31 957.54% 481-4A 800 $19,800.00 $2,154.49 $21,964.49 1,014.76'!, 2S1-4F 802 354,504.00 $3,686.39 $64.186.39 11741.17% 2S1-4A 804 $19,800.00 $4,096.67 $23,896.67 583,32%. 2S1-4A 900 $75,100.00 $3,421.98 $78,521.99 2,294.64% ` 2S1-4A 901 $47,700.00 $4,115.32 $51,815.32 1,259.08% ._._ -.....-. ..ter -•,---._ - --^ - „» PAGE 3-3 CURRENT TOTAL POST LID ASSESSMENT ASSESSED ASSESSMENTS ASSESSED PERCENTAGE TAX TAX MARKET NOT THIS TOTAL MARKET OF MARKET MAP LOTVALUE LID ASSESSMENT VALUE VALUE 56,636.33 5208,436.83 3,140.61% 251-4AB 100 #201,800:00 251-3AB 200 584,900.$)0 $535.31 $35,435:31 15,930.41% 2S1-4AB 300 $80,500.00 >b536.31 481,038x31 15,169.991 2S1-4AB 400 $771100.00 $536.31' $77,536.31 14,476.031 251-4AB 500 $93,500.-00 $536.31 $94,036.31 11,533.977 2SI-4AB 600 $91,100.00 $5716.31 $41,635x31 17,035.467 251-4AB 700 $89,700.00 7536.31 $90,236.31 16,825.427 2al-4AB '300 736,500.00 $536.31 $87,036.31 16,27.8.757 2SI-4AB 400 $90,600.00 $53b.31- $91,136.31 16,993.237 251-4AB 1000 $88,000.00 1536.31 7$8,536.31 16,508.447 251-4AB 1100 $27,700.00 3535.31 x23,236.31 5,264.931 2Si-4A8 1200 $25,200.00 $536.31 $25,736.31 4,798.78% $536.31 25l=4AB 1300 $20,200.00 $20,?35,31 3,366.431 $536.31 $20,735.31 3,866.48X 251=4AB 190'0 $20,200.00 251-4AB 1500 $96,900.00 $536.31 $971438.31 12,167.937 2SI-4AB 1500 $22,700:00 $536.31 $23,236.31 4,332.637 251-4AB 1700 $2,770.00 $536.31 $3,306.31 616.497 251-4AB 1600 $8,550.60 $536.31 $9,085.31 1,694.237 K 2S1-4A8 1900 197,500.00 $536.31 598,038.31 i$,279.B01 291-4AD 2400 $72,400.00 $1,153.43 $73,558.43 5,349.85% 25I-4AD 2500 $19,800.00 $536.31 $20,336.31 3,791.907 251-4AD 2600 .$67,600.00 $536.31 $68,136.31 12,704.667. 2S1-4AD 2601 $64,800.00 $535.31 $65,336.31 12,182.58% 25l-4AD 2700 $87,000.00 $536.31 $87,536.31 16,321.981 2SI-4AD 2800 $88,100.00 $536.31 $B8,636.31 16,527.09% $536.31 $72,235.31 13,469.157 251-4AD 2801 $71,700.00 2SI-4AD 2900 $85,200.00 $536.31 $65,736.31 15,986.357 251-4AD 3000 $19,600.00 $536.31 $20,336.31 3,791.901 2S1-4AD 3100 .$23,800.00 3536.31 $24,336.31 4,537.747 251-4AD 3200 $19,800.00 $536.31 $20,336.31 3,791.901 2SI-4AD 3300 $51,600.00 $536.31 $52,136.31 9,721.31% 2S1-40 3301 $84,200.00 $536.31 $84;736.31 15,799.397 251-4AD 3400 $121,100.00 $536.31 $121,635.31 22,660.257 2S1-4AD 3501 $124,200.00 $536.31 $124,736.31 23,258.27% 2S1-4AD 4600. $2,000.00 $536.31 $2,536.31 472.921 $9,431.05 8116,531.05 1,235.611 251-4B 100 $107,100.00 251-48 101 $23,900.00 7426,176.38 7450,078.33 105.617 251-49D 100 $96,500.00 $536.31 $87,036.31 16,228.757 251-48D 3604 $63,703.00 $10,764.71 $74,457.71 691.767 2S1-4BD 3900 $102,800.00 $9,000.08 $!11,600x06 1,242.211 251-4BD 4000 $108,700.00 $2,963.43 $111,663.43 3,766.047 - $10,516,720.00 $0.00 $3,999,355.00 $14,516,11575.00 362.96% } To Tacd aeav 'Man° El P ea5dn!Valley 8—.P',,".1 L n G•" s 311 ` �',i W fefi.d c A<v eo t c 7 G II (Vane- C Jl P b.,5.!<I: h bent.- •'\,\ !q. qc o ' m n - -e' a•C,..r fem P-- =� VANCOU ER - � snadrb Y ,w WASHING iOh l/y t s w rTh s W e i L p— s/ tY y. OREGON < c1maS 2F `s 1 / ,:• Forest '� S= - ex \ -!•. l-� L x V Trodala— falrwe t Lo y^rWood ;Dc< 1 R«kwon Vdla e -HILLSBORa Dr rr Mme" i. R LII I< wtbn r zF u ~GRESHAh9 o. zel I )t R edYil AI H bet We'll ® ru, i B AVERTO HaPPy IlWauklQ Valley HI "� r Stan xtowr m - Ti r LaP ke �Da aT.L I S�-wC�"��l:.,c kerne p ® " ••N•°.ay_ N 5c is 9 ka t; n Kin c,tY I _ Clty ` }' ennlnBs �. crt°n I• v.F.' Scnoll• ,- .. -4!. .R dg<B o e � Q '- EooBe •� Tu�iatln •,, " Glatle ton13 - c West Un Glego Sher•ood�'• a 7% h{ ° I F c,e -Let,, IJ Four Co.nen, s re. Ik, Wil5oI1YIlI® £ i f•�r.ew Era eOveeaver Yob r h" c, POOLAND Tr Delo k AND VICINITY ' Canb Rurevdle /� �� `o b —•.:J ..w •„ftC /eC��c _ Munoorf s_AtE of IUItEs A r vex rr s i tanCtK d�; _ bancw - _ ont xc.I.:A.s <•r .t,..•x,•s C v coo 2t</. .y yeq.� r Y �. lore Elde \ �...q T t M ea6r br.rrn Aurerd •fit pw�]O E 1", ,M Mw.ksbu6 10s°a., Te Sa m To Sa. I 1. .. .. _. 3 I - Apr i l -19, 1984 To : File Informational Only From • Jerry Kammerman, Road Engineer <Richard L. Knowles, LID Project Coordinator Subject: SW 1351H/SW WALNUT LOCAL IMPRQVEI-UiT DISTRICT The City of Tigard and Washington County are cooperating in the preparation of a feasibility report for the establishment of a Local Improvement District (L.I,D.) that will provide street, sewer and drainage improvements to existing County roads and proposed City ,minor'collectors. The Tigard City Council is scheduled to discuss this proposed L.I.D. in a work session that will beheld at Fowler Junior High.School on Monday, April 23, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. The Washington'County Board of Commissioners will likely take action on the attached recommendations in the'next few weeks. ION The Board of Commissioners of Washington County, the City of Tigard, the City of Beaverton and the State of Oregon enter into an intergovernmental agreement further defining the responsibilities of each body as described below. This agreement should be entered into and made effective prior to the establishment of the L.I.D. 1. The Washington County Board of Commissioners and the Tigard City Council conduct the necessary public hearings at Fowler Junior High School or other locations in the Tigard area. 2. The specific responsibilities of Washington County are to: a) Act as lead coordinating agency for the L.I.D. b) Contract with consultant for feasibility report. c) Contract with engineering firm for engineering work on the L.I.D. d) Review and approve engineering plans and specifications for county improvements. e) Advertise and award bids for construction of L.I.D. improvements. f) Provide funding through bond sales ($2,216,647) for County roads (135th and Walnut) and drainage improvements. g) Maintain proper cost accounting records. h) Manage multi-agency contracts. i) Issue construction change order: after joint approval. j) Provide funds for share of State Highway Project at Scholls Ferry Road ($6,000). E =1110-9 -- --- f 3. The specific responsibilities of the City of Tigard are to: a) Provide a coordinator to work with Washngt County Project Manager. b) Provide funding through bond sales ($1,782,818) for streets other than County roads, and for sewer construction. and', rove engineering plans and specifications for city C) Review approve improvements. d) Maintain proper cost accounting records. e) Accept jurisdiction of approved improvements within the city. f) Provide funds for share of State Highway Project at Scholls Ferry Road' ($6,000). 4. The specific responsibilities of the City of Beaverton are to: a) Provide a coordinator to work with the Washington County Project s' Manager. b) Provide funds for share of State Highway project on Scholls Ferry }' Road ($6,000). 5. The specific responsibilities of the State of Oregon are to: a) Provide a coordinator to work with the Washington County Project +V Manager. b) Prepare plans and specifications for improvements on Scholls Ferry Road at Scholls Ferry Road,and 135th.- c) Receive and incorporate review comments from the county and the cities into plans and specifications.° f d) Advertise and award bids for construction of State Highway Project. f e) Provide funds for 85% of State Highway Project. g4 BACKGFO ND Since its first initiation, the 135th/Walnut L.I.D. has charged in scope and jurisdiction. Initially, a majority of the L.I.D. was under the jurisdiction of Washington Counc.y. With subsequent annexations, more than 75% of the L.I.D. is now within the city of Tigard. The majority of the land in the k L.I.D. is in large parcels owned by a few development interests, however, there are approximately 86 existing homes on small acreages and subdivision 4 Jots. The proposed L.I.D. was initiated in October of 1981 when a public informational meeting was held to determine if a feasibility report should be of the property owners in the proposed prepared. Prior to that meeting, 31% L.I.D. signed petitions supporting the L.I.D. On December 28, 1981, the Washington County Public Works Director recoamnended to the Board of Commissioners that Ginther Engineering be retained to prepare the feasibility report at a cost to the County not to exceed $9500.00. On January 5, 1982, the Board, by Resolution and Order No. 82--6, initiated the L.I.D. and directed the feasibility report be prepared. ' 2 NMI 27 Statelawprovides that a county may administer a L.I.D. within a city provided,there is an intergovernmental agreement. At the present time, there is no formal intergovernmental agreement in force. on January 22, 1982, a letter of understanding was prepared by Washington County_Director of Public Works and signed by the Director of Public Works of the City of Tigard, retaining Ginther Engineering to prepare-a feasibility report for a total cost not to exceed $21,500. The first $19,000 was to be shared equally by Washington County and the City of Tigard and the remainder pro-rated among Russell Krueger ($1000), Amart Development Company ($1000), and Pentera Corporation ($500). On April 5,; 1982, the Board extended the feasibility report to mid-summer of 1982. The consultant contract was;amended on July 19, 1982, to include study of alternatives to the Murray Extension. There were' a series of meetings in ' the fall of 1982 with`ODCT, City of Tigard and Washington County dealing with design and funding. Between;April and November of 1983, the project was suspended pending adoption of the:Comprehensive Plan and the Ccaiununity Plans. Upon completion of these plans, the project was revived in November of 1983` and a draft feasibility report submitted in December of 1983. The L.I.D. feasibility;report is now in its final draft prior to a briefing meeting with the Tigard City Council scheduled for April 23, 1984. A briefing work session will be scheduled with the Washington County Board of Commissioners. Neighborhood meetings will be scheduled following these work sessions. ;The feasibility report will then be revised and submitted to the Board and City Council for adoption and formation of the district. MOLLS FERRY ROAD PRP - tl Representatives from the cities of Beaverton and Tigard, Washington County, and the Oregon Department of Transportation have met and discussed the possibility of using the L.I.B. project to help fund improvements to Scholls Ferry Road adjacent to and west of the L.I.D. The Scholls Ferry Road project would be a State project and would include the realignment of Scholls Ferry x Road into Old Scholls Ferry Road, and signa.lization at Scholls Ferry/Old 4 Scholls Ferry and Scholls Ferry/135th. Scholls Ferry Road would be widened to a minium of three lanes in this area. S Local match requirements for the State project may vary depending upon funding source. Assuming a 'w400,O00 improvement and 15% local match, the } contributions could be: LID: ($400,000 X .15 = $60,000 X .70 = $42,000) Washington County: ($400,000 X .15 = $60,000 X .10 = $ 6,000) Tigard: ($400,000 X .15 = $60,000 X .10 = $ 6,000) Beaverton: ($400,000 X .15 = $60,000 X .10 = $ 6,000) ( 3 (~ This project is separate from the L.I.D.`project and would relieve the L.I.D. project of the cost of providing a signal at 135th and Scholls'Ferry .Road. The L.I.D.;project would provide intersection realignment and widening on the south side of Scholls at 135th. The State project would provide widening elsewhere as needed and provide the signalization. The State project is on ODOP's FY 85 project list. ce Tigard -- Frank Currie Beaverton - Chris Bowles, John Gillam ODOT -;Tom Schwabb Washington County - Daniels, Warner, Angelo s x e; C' i 6[ 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGE14DA OF: April 23, 1484 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: April 19, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUEjAGENDA TITLE: CPA 4-84 Comprehensive Plan 'Amendment REQUESTED BY: Recommendation of WGK Development Plannina Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: "07K CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On 'April3, 1984, the City of Tigard Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on a request by WGK Development for a Comprehensive Plan change from Professional Office to 'High Density` Residential. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the request. A copy of: ' the Planning Commission minutes and an ordinance adopting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for your review. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the ordinance adopting the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance adopting alternative Council finding. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the ordinance adopting the Planning Commission recommendation. (0409P) r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 84— 20 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND UPHOLDING THE PL NTNG COMMISSION'S j APPROVAL - OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT (CPA 4" 4) AND DECLARING AN i EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Tigard` Planning Commission proved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property owned by WGK e e opment at a public tearing on April 3, 1984; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before th City Council on April 23, ,1984;;', and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council uph ld the decision of the Planning Commission after considering the comm is of ,the Planning Commission an appro a the Comprehensive Plan amendment as individual citizens and voted to proposed.' NOW, THEREFORE,, THE;CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOL WS: Section 1: The City Counc' adopts findings in the case as follows: ' 1. The pro sed Comprehensive Plan amendment conforms to the applic le planning policies. 2., The roposed use meets the locational criteria esta lished in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Section 2: The ity Council, therefore, upholds the Planning Comm*ssion's approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment as pro osed and set forth on the attached Exhibit "A" (map). Section 3: .4smuch as it is necessary to revise City Comprehensive Plan aps to allow development in a timely manner, an emergency is declared to exist and this ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor, PASSED: By $� vote of all Council members present after being-read by number and title only, this ®��-a� day of �Q�y,,�� 1984. Deputy City Recorder — City of Tigard APPROVED: This day of , 1984. r Mayor City of Tigard ORDINANCE NO. 84- Q (0409P)- TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 3, 1984 1. President Tepedino called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School - LGI Room - 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon. After calling the meeting to order, President Tepedino 'stated because of his work he would be resigning his position 'as Planning Commission Chairman and also would be resigning from the Planning' Commission after the May 15th election. He then turned the meeting over to Vice Chairman Moen.- 2. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Tepedino; Commissioners Butler, Edin, Fyre, ,Moen, Owens, and Peterson. ASSENT: Commissioner yanderwood, LevereCt. STAFF: Director of Planning & Development Bill Monahan; Associate- Planner Keith Liden; ,Associate Planner Elizabeth Newton Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. 3. , Minutes from March 6,' 1984: were considered. Commissioner Edin noted an page 7 agenda item 5.2, that he ,had voted no. Commissioner Butler noted on page 9, conditions for 53, there should be a 411 condition the same as item 5.2. Also on page 10 Mr. Ludlum's name needed to be corrected.- Commissioner Tepedind -moved for approval with corrections. Commissioner 6 Butler seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 4, PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION a Agenda items 5.6 and 5.7 would not be heard tonight. 5.1 CPA 2-84 ANNEXATIONS A- request by the City of Tigard to add a policy to the City's Comprehensive Plan requiring that lands annexed to the City be given the City zoning designation which most closely conforms to the existing county designation for the property. The policy will be added as 10.1.3 in the Comprehensive Plan., ® Associate Planner Newton, made staff's recommendation to adopt policy 10.1.3. Discussion followed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY ® No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC NEARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION w Commissioner Tepedino moved for approval per staff's findings and recommendations. Commissioner Owens seconded. o Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 1 s � f 0 64 CO t i S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY N { 7 D � I Q 2 w N • W f v W cn cn oi rin to 0 � - 0 v _= M,4 00 N ,09'b it, 11 �_ - - --- SCHEDULE A Amount X60,000.00 Date July 3, 1970 At 2:21 P.M. $ INSURED -ROGER & 'GLENN--- -AND-- -=V.T. G. K. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-- The fee simple title to said land is, at the date hereof, vested in EVA A. MOORE.--- -_t t (Beginning nd referred to in this policy is described as: act of land in Section 10, Township 2 South, Range l West of Willamette Meridians in Washington County, Oregon, described follows: l atan iron at the center of said Section 1a and running ce South 89°270 West 223 feet; thence North 0005' West 414.6 feet; thence North £ 9027' -East 772.6 feet to a-point on the West .' boundary of West Side Highways thence south 13°420 West along said highway 427.1 feet to a point in the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Sections 10; thence south 89027' West 447.7 feet to the place o.f beginning; SAVE and EXCEPT a tract of land in Section 10, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at an iron at the centers of said Section 10; running thence North 69 279 East 447.7 feet more or less, to a point.on` the West erly boundary of the West Side Highway, which point is the true place of beginning of the tract herein to be described; running thence North 13°420 East along the Westerly boundary of the West Side Highway 427,.1 feet thence South 89 27' West 210.13 feet ; thence South 13®420 west parallel with the Westerly boundary of the West Side Highway 427.1 -feet; thence North 890271 East 210.13 feet to the true place of beginning.-- c� z ra of PoLltr No. 31.7516 } 4 low IR qY 1 t i ni '�. Iff JAM S � �' �' ut„ w sit' r.�,,.,a �< .�-��♦ rj e'� �I f a i �,�e x- xy,,..',s-...§;.;sw ,.. �as�"k■.� "�'wa \y .3+� ti r� R�' ;. � „a'�"', y�r � €�-, 1 :;nN �r►. i� ■ �its.�„tt�? �ti^?. s^Sra � ,,,�#^ _. '`�`d ''fir x + x 7 �'�er,��Rk- " fir .y r , atw.fu . An 7 , *,- t_��x� ..:�..,,�.::,._4.:�.nuc ,xu?x.�z.._3t:A.~>,�e'sd �::�v��C�-sP3r'�`.s,_��i2;h�a�s��SExr'�'��^.� '�F'�+.``�';r �?"ram'ar:.�^�,?. ,"�..➢��✓�ry..�xm i�Ya,.'"�—,_�`�.,'"..'�,a.'7.��. .-z wia STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.3 April 3,'`1984 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 ' A. FINDING OF FACT 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Variance CPA 4-84, ZC 4-84, V`6-84 F REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Professional Office to High Density Residential, =a Zone Change from C-P ,(Commercial Professional to R-40 (Residential, 40+ units/acre), and a Variance :to the Residential Density Transition requirements in Section 18.40.040 of the Community Development Code. APPLICANT: WGK Development Corp. OWNER: same 1703 Pacific Ave. Forest Grove, OR 97116 ` LOCATION: Northwest corner of Beef Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map. 2S1 lOAC, Tax Lot 1000). LOT AREA: 4.33 acres NPO COMMENT: NPO #3 recommends approval of the request. RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the request. 2. Background The property was annexed to the City on February 8, 1978. A zone change from the Washington County RU-20 to City C-P (Commercial Professional) was approved on June 12, 1978. A conditional use application to establish a 146 bed home for the aged was approved on July 25, 1978. 3. Vicinity Information Multiplefamily residences within King City are situated on the south side of Beef Bend Road. Large acreage homesites in Washington County lie to the west and northwest. These properties are designated in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan for Low Density Residential development (1 to 5 units/acre). Undeveloped land to the northeast is within the City and is zoned C-P. STAFF REPORT CPA 4-84, GC 4-84, V 6-.84 PAGE 1 ..ems ..-.,. �....�.,,. t �tt I . A frontage road for the Pacific> Highway is immediately east of the h of the subject property are identified in property. The parcels nort the Plan as an "Established Area" while the subject property and land to the 'east'and west is considered as' a "Developing Area". t � 4. Site Information and Proposal Description t Except for one residence on the property which will be removed, the parcel is undeveloped. The property slopes downward from an elevation s in- the northwest corner of 310 feet to 242 feet in the southeast corner. The southwest section of the parcel as well as the northern and western property lines are wooded with a combination of coniferous and deciduous trees. The remainder of the property is cleared. The applicant is proposing to establish an 84 to 90 unit condominium project. A preliminary site plan has been submitted as part of the application, however, this will be evaluatedduring the Site Development , Review process 'if the rezoning request is approved. A variance to the Residential Densitv Transition requirements (Section 18.40.040)' is also requested to allow construction of more than 6.25 ` dwelling units per acre within 100 feet of the western two-thirds of the northern }r3perty line. The applicant contends that the variance is necessary for an efficient- and attractive developmentofthe property. A written statement addressing the variance criteria (Section 18.134.050) has been 'submitted. s 5. �ency Comments a. The State Highway Division has no objection to the proposal. The Division notes that a traffic impact and drainage studies will be required as part of site development review. Also, any access onto the frontage road will need to be as far north as possible. b. The Building Inspector and Engineering Divisions have no objection to the request. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Comprehensive Plan Amendments should be evaluated according to applicable Statewide, Planning Goals and relevant Plan policies. Goal 10, which calls for provision of adequate housing for the needs of the community, region, and state and Goal 11 which calls for orderly and efficient provision of public facilities and services are the most relevant to this proposal. The Metropolitan Housing Rule, adopted by LCDC, states that Tigard must achieve an overall density of ten units per acre with at least 50 percent of the new construction consisting of single family attached or multiple family housing. The Comprehensive Plan shows only one area that is designated for High Density Residential development. In 1-oP:t STAFF REPORT - CPA 4-84, ZC 4-84, V 6-84 PAGE 2 of ; the Housing Goal and the Metropolitan Housing Rule, designating additional land in suitable locations for High Density development would be appropriate'.. Policy 6.1.1 of the Plan states that the City will provide a diversity of housing types and densities. The Plan has designated residential areas primarily for low and medium density development. Provision for additional high density development would help maintain this diversity. Policy 7.1.2 provides that new development shall coincide with the availability of adequate services and facilities. Based upon the comments received and the information available to the Planning staff, adequate services and facilities can be -provided. Necessary on-site improvements including half-street construction and storm drainage facilities will be constructed as:' a condition of site development approval. Adequate access is provided by Beef Bend Road which is designated as a collector and Pacific Highway .'which serves as an arterial.' The 'Tigard Area Comprehensive Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway Plan has designated Beef Bend Road as a bicycle route. Chapter 12 of the Plan lists locational criteria on page 79 and 80 that should be considered in conjunction with this application. Medium-High and High Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on. the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street, (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (S) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. LL � r uTAFF REPORT CPA 4-84, ZC 4=84, V 6--84 PAGE 3 The property ,is not committed to low density development and due to the terrain, natural vegetation, lack of nearby development, and landscaping requirements , of Site Development Review, adequate buffering can be provided as this area develops. The property has direct access to a collector and Pac'i'fic Highway and Tri-diet busservice is" available-at Beef Bend Road and Pacific Highway. There are no apparent development limitations on the site that are sufficient to preclude''high density development and adequate services appear to be available. The applicant submitted 'a written response dated March 15, 1984 which addresses the five 'variance criteria listed in Section 18.134.050 of the Code. Staff has reviewed the applicant's justification for waiving the requirements of Section 18.40.040 which -calls for a 100-foot density transition area between established and developing ' areas. The reasons presented appear to be justified. Also, the 'NPO and the one affected property owner have reviewed the variance request and have no objection. Based upon , the discussion above, the proposed Comprehensive Pian Amendment/Zone Change/Variance appears to be appropriate. Specific issues relating to the development of the project: can be adequately evaluated during Site Development Review. C. 'RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CPA 4c-84, ZC 4-84 and 6-84 to the City Council. PREP ED WY-- M-iEtth Lzden APPROVED BY; William A. Monahan Associate Planner Director of Planning & Development (IASL:pm/0383P) STAFF REPORT CPA 4-84, ZC'4-84, V 6-84 PAGE 4 s rr'5.2 CPA 3-84 OPEN SPACE OVERLAY` A request by the City of Tigard to adopt a site specific 'map designating �r floodplain areas within the City'-, Urban- Growth Boundary with a € floodplain district overly. r` a Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation that the �f Planning Commission approve a recommendationforwarding to City ' Council ` the '`open space overlay and land use designations' to properties within the open space boundaries. Land use designations should be in conformance with existing zoning designations on all $' properties. ` PUBLIC TESTIMONY 'a s ® No one appeared to speak.. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED ' COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION # ® Commissioner Tepedino questioned why, houses were allowed to be built in the floodplain. Discussion followed on how homes were built in greenway floodplain areas and whether this would encourage building in open space areas. • Commissioner Tepedino moved ,to table until staff could determine which lots are specifically affected, what peramiter was used to draw the greenway and contact Legal Counsel on how to deal with lot specifically affected. Commissioner Edin seconded. Motion carried unanimously. k 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4-84 ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-84 VARIANCE V 6-84 WGK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NPO # 3 A request for a Comprehensive Plan Change from Professional Office to High Density Residential and a Zone Change from C-P (Professional g, Commercial) to R-40 (Multiple Family Residential, 40 units/acre) and to vary the Residential Density Transition requirements in Section .. 18.40.040 of the Community Development Code on the 4.33 acre, property � located on the northwest corner of Beef -Bend Road and SW Pacific Hwy. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10AC, Tax Lot 1000). ® Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval. NPO COMMENTS a Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, NPO ##3, "made recommendation that the Planning Commission approve this application. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Q Dale McCullough, 3027 Watercrest Road, Forest Grove, explained the difficulty they have been having trying to develop property as commercial. Now were requesting a change to high density residential. l PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 2 h. k is representing the applicant, reviewed' the topography and a Ryan O'Brien, t shape of - property to support their request for a variance. he explained' - a mistake to how the owner realized it was have the property zoned commercial and because of the NPO #3's input, decided to request the change. f PUBLIC TESTIMONY ® Fred A. Anderson, represented himself as a property owner, as wellasa being an attorney for several other property owners. He did not oppose the application. He was concerned that the development would be developed in accordance with, City code. He submitted a statement of Sewer Service availability from USA. His main concern was for proper sewer service and storm water orainoff. Mayor of King City, 15390 SW 116th, was also concerned e Jean K. Young, Y want to be assured that the with same problems as Mr. Anderson. They sewer service and storm water drainage will be adequate handle this development. Also wanted Beef Bend Road to be taken caree of. Cit Administrator for King City, 11588 SW Royal a Dennis Bouman, y Parkway, was concerned that access to the project be properly constructed. a Beverly Frowde, 12200 SW Bull Mountain, CPO Chairperson. They were concerned about the condition of the traffic system. Does not oppose the plan. CROSS EXAMINATION & REBUTTAL would be ® Vice President Moen asked staff how the public concerns 4 addressed. 1 ® Associate Planner L en explained Discussion how followingDregardingtthe process.Review v address these problems. USA and since y had over o Bob Bledsoe statedhe TDCto City standards. had aisedadequate service eavailable en Also sewer service City code would require street improvements a Commissioner .Edin felt he would rather, have Planning Commission 6 review the Site Development Review. a Discussion regarding density transfer and open space recreational area. o Ryan O'Brien stated they intended to request Planning Commission review the Site Development Review. He also explained how they would take care of sewer, storm water service and traffic circulation. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION & ACTION ® have the Site Development Review Consensus of Commission was to application come before them. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 3 EMU 0 Commissioners Edin, `Butler andMoen were concerned about the variance but felt they"could'"support as the neighbors did not oppose. 0 Commissioner Edin moved to forward recommendation of approval to City Council for CPA 4-84, and approve ZC 4-84 & 6-84 with the condition that Planning Commission review the Site Development Review. Commissioner Owens seconded. Commissioner Moen asked they add that staff address problems of sewer, storm water and traffic.' Motion carried unanimously. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-84 and ZONE CHANGE ZC - N-�� 7LEE CUNNINGHAM, rfrom R-7(PD) (Residential Single Family, 7 A request for a -zone change " A quest Planned Development) to CP (Commercial Professional) and a ity Residential to Comprehensive Plan change from Medium Dens Professional Office on property located at 12528 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33RD, Tax:Lot 2400). 0 Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval. NPO COMMENTS ® Richard Boberg, NPO #7 'Chairman, submitted a '-letter supporting the t application. c APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION e Lee Cunningham, 12528 Sw Scholls Ferry Road, explained why the property had not developed already as CP and requested to regain CP zoning. PUBLIC TESTIMONY e No one appeared to speak. CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL Commissioner Owens commented that she had ,mentioned this during the comprehensive plan hearing and had thought this lot was to be CP on the Plan. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION & ACTION w Commissioner Owens moved to forward CPA 12-84 to City Council with recommendation of approval and to approve Zone Change ZC 8-84 per staff's recommendations. Commissioner Fyre seconded. . Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 4 �v ArMa -*q Npo * S \dE K hLvLLomm� folkn p3ra wn a I t'e►ei'�e epa�afa tar�ap ape epa e0: rpa tie tit eat ijt � _ _ I'7'7�1�T�amj��°�°�!�t�Tt�t]�t°Its'_ !tie!'ja$��'t�elaaeS�fptr�tle�tga#ea+jaa3-f;+�a�tBD�atajage�a�'�rei3i�ajete�ata�aoa�y,j,�o�att ; �,�.'�...�=.s ,, .•-.-:.�c�_ NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED I -- -.-,-..... 2 3 !} 5 8 3' _ � y DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN -' _ - - 7 B S O . THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF T}£ORIGINAL DRAWING. - OE 62 BZ Cz 9z sz Lz £z zz lZ Qz 61 BI if —91 —si— bt if of __..o!_6 _®_ `- ---5b £..__z a�+i waejatnlaulLeadauajeuaMw qan — .4. � � .$aaws•It�� '*�4P �� ' Yom... - - -_: - - .. .. - . �'. a - � � ,�. ,��,�:, �-��•�'� - �' gar �� - _o - '$: •,�Y„at �-fr<a: ;< "" —'OP�tLE_CAMME.ttil • �. � • ��, --s ti �r s•, r'i v a,, a , 4` SUB� GT PRDPE2TY s uogTu- T L %000 - M/kP 2S f-I O AG. iW-SO .6,3 Pc. `( VIV IOo' ,q O �* �• Fl ,. - n �v d _ G- o.N AL lift i - L u ' i I • T"" e •- L Ps� a -,.PY..:.; '. -r - O' •` .�J�FP�',yr.F-ID.,t?AfaD s - k v- �f «.� , ,t.. t 4}' s, v i' , q • (. •••,•••••• •.11...,. 1! ur�irrrrsrrtmrnuullll1piafrinIIIII111111111111111RI�IIIII�f �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111.111 111 111 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIi 1 1«Fu� I i•l.i.I,i•14ir1•1 1 1.1�!•-1•ir'•i•I•i•t•ir1�i• �C•I'T'1-•-1-•-1 •-I-•'1'• i v .-._.._.....-b...- . l NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 rO If i2 Ix DRAWING a' DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO TF£ QUALITY OF TIE ORIGINAL , DRAWING. OE 6Z BZ LZ 92 SZ bZ ""EZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 81 L1 EI 21 11_...-01 6 8 1 9 S IF _ f 2 13mm C� APR 2 9 1984 UU Artis CITY �3 �(G� � 11670 S.W. Bull MOUntain I'.oad PLANNING GAPS, Tigard, Oregon97223 City Recorder. or Planning Director City of 'Tigard 12755 S.W. Asia Ave. Tigard, .Oregon 97223 ae strongly oppose the comprehensive plan chane This is ' to notify you that � y proposed for the norLhWest corner of Reef Bend Road anct S.v,. Pacific TIwy. (Wash. Co. Tax map 2S1 10AC, Ta-ut lot 1000) - Sincerely, 000) .Sincerely, t � J Dr. and Mrs. Gregor- A;tis i STATEMENT OF SEVIER SERVICE AVAILABILITY This statement is supplied at the request of FRED ANUERSON dated 3/30/84 A copy of the request is attached. The property here- inafter` referred to is the property described in the request. t. The Unified Sewerage Agency has authority to and will supply sanitary sewer service :to the property subject to compliance by the property owner, his agents and employees with all applicable rules,``regulations and laws related to sanitary sewer service`. If construction of sewer lines other than those designated for public con- struction on the Washington County Master Plan for Sewerage Works is necessary, such construction will be the responsibility of the property owner except to the extent that the Agency may; agree to participate in the cost. 2. Treatment plant capacity adequate for the proposed use of the property (is) (*.gXRAq) presently available and (will) 7 ) be available during -a period of one year following ;the date of this statement. If adequate capacity is; not and/or will not during the ensuing year be available, future capacity is projected as follows: 3. A sanitary sewer line(s) adequate for the proposed use OW) (is not) avail- able to %.he property. If the property is in a city that has immediate control of local cogl_ction sewer lines, no line information is available from the Agency. If an adequate sanitary sewer line(s) is not available, the nearest adequate line is from the property. The property can be served in the following manner: e�sea�d$n a�n opo�ra��h�these lots can be served by construction of Public - �� er rcar�_the qi sti ne line located i n S.W. 116th five aRp�`o�i mater 5® feet 9iLSiyn Yea n ass el 4. The property (A-E) (is not) presently connected to a public sewer. 5. Additional remarks: The foregoing statement is furnished to the person requesting it with the under- standing of the said person: that it is based in part on ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS and TOES NOT CONSTITUTE A GUARANTEE OR COM14ITMENT that adequate sewer service will be available to the property at any specific time. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCYOF WASHINGTON COUNTY �. By: TAX MAP NO ZS1 10AC 1000 — J�AN�iC N�d3�ICK Dat75-52A 7, e .� MEW 5 STATEMENT OF SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY This statement is supplied at the request of RYAN O'BRIEN dated 3/27/84 A copy of the request is attached. The;property here- inafter referred to is the .property described in the request. 1. The Unified Sewerage Agency has authority to and will supply sanitary sewer service to the property subject to compliance by the property owner, his agents and employees with all applicable rules, regulations and lass related to sanitary sewer service. . If construction of sewer lines other- than those designated for'public con- struction' on the Washington County Master Plan for Sewerage Works is necessary, such construction will be the responsibility of the propertyowner except to the extent that the Agency may agree to participate in the cost. 2. Treatment plant capacity adequate for the proposed use of the property ( t) presently available and (will) ( c�YrXt) be available during a period off j one;year following the date of this statement. If adequate capacity is not and/or will not 'during the ensuing year be available, future capacity is projected as e k follows: i y�y 8 3. A sanitary sewer 'line(s) adequate for the proposed use kks) (is not) avail- able to the property. If the property is in a city that has immediate control of local collection sewer lines, no line information is available from the Agency. If an adequate sanitary sewer line(s) is not available, the nearest adequate line is from the property. The property can be served in the following manner: D2oe Qn teo4raphv these lots can be served by construction of Gub7ic e s in line located in S.W. 115th approximately 50 feet cnnth of Raaf gend_Aya%+_ 4. The property mss) (is not) presently connected to a public sewer. ¢ t 5. Additional remarks: This manhole is approximately l5 feet deep � e Theforegoingstatement is furnished to the person requesting it with the under- j standing of the said person that it is based in part- on ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS and t DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A GUARANTEE OR COMMITMENT that adequate sewer service will be t available to the property at any specific time. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUN 2S1 10BD 1200 B .- -ICK �� TAS MAP Nn.. JEANNE HE Date 3/30/84_ , 75-52,A x CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984: AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: April 19, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION:' Council Waived The ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: 'CPA 12-84 Fee Requirement. Lee Cunningham REQUESTED BY: Recommendation of j� Planning Commis-sign DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: � 'Y � ` �� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On April 3, 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on a request by Lee Cunningham for a' Comprehensive Plan .Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Professional Office on property located at 12528 SW iScholls Ferry Road. The Commission voted unanimously to support the request. The Planning Commission minutes and an ordinance are attached for your consideration. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the Ordinance adopting Lhe Planning Commission recommendation. 2. Deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the ordinance adopting the Planning Commission recommendation. (EAN:br/0410P) v _ n 6 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 3, -1984 1. President Tepedino called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM. The meeting was held atFowlerJunior High School LGIRoom - 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard,' Oregon. After "calling the meeting to order, President Tepedino stated because of his work he would- be resigning his position as Planning Commission Chairman and also would be resigning> from the Planning Commission after the May: 15th 'election. He then turned the meeting over to Vice Chairman Moen. 2. ROLL CALL:[PRESENT: President Tepedino; Commissioners Butler, Edin, Fyre, Moen, Owens, and Peterson. ENT: Commissioner Vanderwood, Leverett. STAFF:. Director of Planning & Development Bill' Monahan; Associate Planner -Keith Liden; Associate Planner Elizabeth Newton; Secretary Diane M. Jelderks. 3. Minutes from March 6, 1984 were considered. Commissioner Edin noted on page 7-agenda item 5.2,; thathehad voted no. Commissioner Butler noted on page 9, conditions for 5.3, there should be a #ll condition the same as item' 5•2. Also on page 10 Mr.r. Ludlum's name needed to be corrected. Commissioner Tepedino-moved --for approval w-ith -corrections. Commissioner �._ Butler seconded, Motion carried unanimously. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION a Agenda items 5.6 and 5.7 would not be heard tonight. 5.1 CPA 2-84 ANNEXATIONS A request by the City of Tigard to add a policy to the City's Comprehensive Plan requiring that lands annexed to the City be given the City zoning designation which most closely conforms to the existing county designation for the property. The policy will be added as 10.1.3 in the Comprehensive Plan. a Associate Planner Newton, made staff's recommendation to adopt policy 10.1.3. Discussion followed. PUBLIC TESTIMONY ® No .one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED ` r COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION a Commissioner Tepedino moved for _approval per staff's findings and recommendations. Commissioner Owens seconded. a Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 1 -mo mga-4-q — - --- - - -- -_• � _�---nor i a Commissioners :Edin, 'Butler and Moen were concerned about the variance but felt they could support as :the neighbors did not oppose.` ® Commissioner Edin moved to forward recommendation of approval to City Council for CPA 4-84, and approve ZC 4-84'-& V 6-84 with the condition that Planning Commission review the Site Development Review. Commissioner_ Owens_seconded. e Commissioner Moen asked they add .that staff -address problems of sewer, storm water and traffic. Motion carried unanimously. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE FLAN AMENDMENT CPA 12-84 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 8-84 LEE CUNNINGHAM NPO 7 A request for a zone change from R-7(PD) (Residential Single Family, 7 { units/acre, Planned Development) to CP (Commercial Professional) and a Comprehensive Plan change from Medium Density Residential to Professional Office on property located at 12528 SW Scholls Ferry Road, { ' Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33AD, Tax Lot 2400). e Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval. NPO COMMENTS 6 E e Richard ;Boberg, NPO #7 Chairman, submitted a letter supporting the s application. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION E n Lee Cunningham, 12528 SW Scholls Ferry Road, explained why the property had not developed already as CP and requested to regain CP zoning. PUBLIC TESTIMONY i a No one appeared to speak. CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL i r ® Commissioner Owens commented that she had mentioned this during the comprehensive plan hearing and had thought this lot was to be Cr on E the Plane , a PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED f COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION & ACTION i I � ®" Commissioner Owens moved to forward CPA 12-84 to City Council with recommendation of ,approval and to approve Zone Change ZC 8-84 per staff's recommendations. Commissioner Fyre seconded. I '; Motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1984 - PAGE 4 t. ,f STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.4 s TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON 97223 } A. FINDING OF FACT 1. General Information CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 2-84 and Zone Change ZC 8-84 e REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, from Medium Density For a Residential to Professional office a lannedodeve®pment)rta R-7; (PD)'(Residential, 7 units/acre, P C-p;(commercial Professional). 4 APPLICANT: Lee Cunningham OWNER: same 13385 Sw 115th Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 12528 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard ( Wash'. Co. Tax Map ISI €`. 33AD, Tax Lot 2400)• 4_ NPO COMMENT: NPO #7 recommends approval of the proposal. RECOMMENDATION:. The' Plaand Zone Chrecommange ends approval of the Plan Amendment 2. Background A Zone Change (ZC 14-79) was granted by the City in 1979 on the subject property from Washington CountyR 5-1 to to C- istComm veterinary f clinic on rcial Pr Additional approvals were granted the property (CU 7-79 and SDR 21-79) 3. Vicinity Information` on the ide of Ferry Road, The property is located the Summer uLaketh sdevelopment. An Fundeveloped immediately northeast of property zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) lies to the east and the City of Beaverton is north of the road. Site Information and Pro osal Description t , and one is being used the The property contains several buildings t Sorrento Animal Hospital• 'Ilse applicant would like Co continue with the renovation of the existing structures ew edical, and ldental office ce use or ncomplex struct nis buildings for the same purpose. the applicant's long range development goal for the property. 8 84 PAGE 1 STAFF REPORT - CPA 12-84 & ZG 4, F 5. tAgenc y Comments The State Highway Division does not object to the request. The Division i notes that as a condition of further development on the property, additional right-of-way dedication and an approach road permit will be - required. , Other commenting agencies have no objection to the 'proposal. R. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION k In 1979, the City made a commitment to allow Commercial Professional development on the subject property. During the; later revision of the g i Plan and Code which was finalized in November, 1983, the property was �. rezoned to R-7 (PD) because of an oversight. It was not acknowledged that the applicant had actively requested and received the C-P zoning from the City approximately four years earlier. Chapter 12 of the Comprehensive Plan lists a number of locational criteria that should be applied to Commercial Professional development. Several of the criteria apply mainly to the review of s specific proposal and not a zone change. The relevant criteria from pages 82 and 83 of the Plan are noted below: s Commercial Professional Commercial Professional areas are intended for a diverse range of office usesand 'supportive uses; and to promote user convenience throughout the City. A. Scale T17 - Trade area. Varies (2) Site size. Varies (3) Gross leasable area. Varies B. Locational Criteria (1) Spacing and Location (a) The comprehensive Plan map fixes exact boundaries of the commercial professional area. (b) The commercial professional area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides. (2) Access (a) The proposed use or expansion of an existing area shall not crgate traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination shall be based on the street capacity, existing and projected traffic 1. STAFF REPORT - CPA 12-84 & ZC 8-84 PAGE 2 �WIM ... - Nil _ - - t fi volumes, the speed limit, number of turning movements and the traffic characteristics of the generating various types of uses. tial development on two sides. The property, will be adjacent to residen Scholls Ferry Road is designated as an: arterial State in hHighwayrD vision Plan and adequate `access i ,s available. Also , has no objection to Commercial Professional development on the property• the proposed Comprehensive Plan Based upon the discussion above, � Amendment/Zone Change appears to be appropriate. z l � C. RECOMMENDATION and ZC 8-84. The Planning staff recommends approval of CPA 12-84 ' 5 APPROVE B : William A. Monahan E ' PREPARE BY: Keith Li Director of Planning & ¢ Associate Planner Development � r. (KSL:pm/0380P) €' t r` F : e STAFF REPORT - CPA 12-84 & ZC 8-84 - PAGE 3 -,:,Rags _ ITEMS 11 & 12 WERE TABLED UNTIL APRIL 30, 1984 SPECIAL MEETING i 4, �.=0IRSSFS +•+_�� MEMORANDUM r CITY OF TIGARD, ,OREGON TO: Mayor and City 'Council April 12, 1984 FROM: Jerri L. Widner, Finance Director SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT SUMMARY -'MARCH ACCOUNTING: The month of March saw the Accounting;Division converting sewer customer.' files to the upgraded program. If you recall,: the old program blew up. This conversion process will not be completed until June. During the month of March, 532 checks were issued, '556 receipts were issued, 378 citations were received by Municipal Court with $6,057 collected ;in fines. SUPPORT SERVICES: Word Processing received 167 work orders duringMarch with an average turn around time of 2.3 hours. The Division has assisted the Accounting Division in getting ,the sewer billing records on the DP system. Business Tax revenue for March is $2490.00 representing 55 businesses. ADMINISTRATION: The purchasing training classes were given in March along with implementing the new forms. Personnel processing continues with the transfer of record-keeping responsibilities in Finance. The receptionist received 8,567 telephone calls and received 2,278 walk-ins. My time was spent on a variety of issues--elections (candidates, tax base and general obligation bond), Bancroft billings, development of new billing forms, etc.). JLW:ms (0292F) k t - e ' a i`._ PUUICPhone 533--9511 12568 SW Main-Tigard, Or.972223 MONTHLY REPORT March 1984 z ` i TO: Library Board d f a City Council FROM: City Librarian Budget 1984-85: The Budget Committee approved the Proposedbudget for 1984685, recommending a new tax base to support it. This measure will go on the ballot May 15. If the tax base passes, most library services will go up: to level III. If not, cuts in staff and 'funding will put the library at core level. WCCLS Budget: The City Manager and City Librarian attended two meetings with ., Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) staff, Citizen Advisory Board members, and other city managers and 'librarians. One meeting was also attended by the County Administrator.: A contract for, library services between the public libraries (city and community) and the county has evolved, providing administrative guidelines to allow the continuance of WCCLS;if funds are avail- r able after June 30, 1984. This contract will be submitted to Tigard City Council on,April'9. Presently, the county plans to put the WCCLS budget into its tax base request on May 15. If this passes,, WCCLS will receive $2.2 million for starting up,automation and operations for FY 84-85. If it fails, WCCLS may have a chance: to submit a serial levy in June. ,Should funding continue for WCCLS, a new contract will be sought which would provide for a'fair and realistic relation- ship between the public libraries and the county. If neither the tax base nor the serial levy passes, the public libraries will plan for terminating free access t to county patrons. Building Conditions On March l a large piece of ceiling (approx. 2'X4"-) fell just in front of the main entry. The cause was thought to be water damage from a leak in the roof. The owner repaired the damage expeditiously. Public Works has made some repairs to warped shelving to prevent tipping and dumping books on k someone. WCCLS Professional Board: Librarian attended the WCCLS professional board meeting on March 29. Of interest: (1) An ad hoc committee was appointed to decide on a plan to handle termination of county-wide free access to public libraries if WCCLS ` does not receive funding for 1984-85. (2) Wes Doak, Oregon State Librarian, pre- sented his legislative plan to the group. He advocates supporting the state library entirely from the general fund, $.40 per capita from the general fund, all LSCA monies going to local libraries and more resource sharing statewide. }I' LarRe Print Grant: The Large Print grant request in which Tigard participated was approved. Tigard, with eight other public libraries who requested large print materials, will participate in a pilot program that will rotate collections of large print books among these nine libraries. $70,000 was allocated for the program and it will be administered through the Multnomah County Library. This will give Tigard access to many more large print books than would have been received through a separate grant. If the program is a success, it will be expanded to include all" . Oregon libraries. - 4 TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY - MONTHLY REPORT - March 1984 - 'page 2 Volunteers: Twenty-one volunteers works a total of 189 hours; daily average, 7r"hours. ' Youth Services: The big ,news for March is the overall increase in circulation, 27.7% over the record set just last month and 2.`77 from March of 1983. ; This is especially noteworthy considering the library had 36 fewer hours of service in Marcia. Marchi 1984 juvenile circulation was over 1000 items higher than. March 1982. Juvenile books sent to the bindery were returned in March and are being processed. A:special poem of the month, The Wolf, was written by Meegan Hurt, a fifth grade patron. ; Her 'poem won a WashingtonPark Zoo contest. The tremendous growth in 800's circulation is partially: attributable to the Poem of the Month and Riddle of the Month displays. Storytime attendance continues to grow slowly.'; Four groups visited the library for tours in March. Planning continues for Summer`-Reading with the selection of prizes, logos and 'programs. Work Indicators: March '1984 March 1983 Adult Books 7311 7555 Juvenile Books 3553 3454 i. Interlibrary Loan 56 81 Magazines 549 565' Records/Cassettes 138 187 Other 80 43 TOTAL CIRCULATION 11,687 11,885 Days of Service 23 23 4 Average Daily Circulation 508 517 ` Increase/Decrease over t previous year 27- 137+ Reference/Reader`s Advisory 482 623 Materials Added 392 488 Materials Withdrawn 234 63 Storytime Total 89 105 Borrowers: New/Renewal 265+168=433 262+141=40.3 q: — �, M ,s CITY OF TIGARD,' OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1934 AGENDA ITEM h: 1. DATE SUBMITTED: April 19, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: 's ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Monthly'Report — March REQUESTED BY: Planning and Development 1 DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: , -------------------- ------- ----- ---- --- - -- --------- ------ INFORMATION SUMMARY a Attached is the monthly report for Planning and Development. Enclosed are: Cover memo including Comprehensive Plan update. Building Division Report Planning Decisions Annexation Report Codes Enforcement Report ' Economic Development Committee Report e; ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED t. --- -- -- ---- _ SUGGESTED ACTION Accept and place on file. .. r f MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD t p TO: Members of the City Council FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development 5 t DATE: April 19, 1984 SUBJECT: Monthly Report - March [ c s Attached please find the March monthly report for the 'Department of Planning and Development. Elements of the report are: Building Division Report - Planning Decisions t Codes Enforcement Report Annexation Report Economic Development Committee Report t Building and Planning Activities remained at a study level during March. i Nineteen single family permits were issued. Compared to 1983, through March, Building Activity is running higher than 1983. Following is a comparison: 1 Through March 1983 Through March 1984 Singh Family Permits 49 53 Commercial Permits l 6 Building Permit Fees $20,640.50 $24,926.50 Plan ChecY Fees $13,177.13 $11,983.84 Plumbing Permits $6,147.50 $8,004.70 r Mechanical Permits $1,289.69 $1,428.52 Sign Permits $525.00 $665.00 Valuation $4,007,344.00 $5,263,621.00 Comprehensive Plan Report k, During March the Planning Staff was involved in providing data to LCDC as they f' evaluated our Comprehensive Plan. Their review was completed on April 5, 1984. In response to verbal comments, the staff prepared a number of comprehensive plan revisions which were submitted to the Planning Commission for rev-.ew. These revisions addressed minor corrections which were necessary. G t mss...._.� ..®.-,v ....o..... -- - 9 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: April 3, 1984 for month of MARCH - Building Division SUBJECT* Monthly Report March's building netivities include permits for 10 sign, 19 single family esidential alter/repair, 2 commercial, g residential, 2 rcommercial ' 1 educational .-and :1 demolition, far a total valuation of ..alter/repairs , - $2,282,822.00. Fees for 33 permits $14,087.49 Fees for 10 signs -470.00 1,845.00 Plumbing Acitivity - 22 Mechanical Activity - 16 358.52 TOTAL. . .....$ $16,761.01 Sewer Connections - 26 $58,410.00 .Sewer Inspections - 25 $ 890.00 x 4 3 ' QO.A O O ©. O A'Q O O O O O O C. 0 0 o a o-o o o;A o O p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a'o 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ,d d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 N O '. • ' O O O O O O O O.O O �'s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ' p.p O.O O o.O N O O " " 00000000. - S t _.o O O o.0 N C o O o.O o O"O O n0 O t!1 .. O O O C. C e` O`O O O'.O O O:.O O O O O. _ p..u'� cn O N N N:..000 N co 7 Q c)0 00 r, N — •O'3 'o 10 00 � 0..� `O N � � ctY rt M N H N , V1 00 W to 00 N 14i PO S>:S � y' oG PG p' oa a5 OS ar � d'ddd66dd ,„ , Hcd c.d+5H.N.w H.c.0+ H.+ '.'.+i r.+a ..+ ..++ .a+ rr ..•i � C• 4 r+ ra -t I r5 d4 -I ddddGd + a r- . cd -4 dO G d d. 0d ddcd d . i ..a ... ..� ..+ ..� •U •U U U.U U U U U U CC07)'[C '•bw�N °.ad.-+ °.dd '•d.� .•yd 'yO •Qt) .r�a yd co d 0) dN .0 .0 "d NN NNNN 0 d d 0ULN+ ULO�yp+..v 0O O O CN Oa U6Ov7 v64O.+). vGdO+ cv6O O ol N AwUV ododa+ �., r U R+ 4 d 3 0 . Lam+ L 0) g En tn rd G) 0) Go .wc p0 a00) GUG 0da 0wCL d L ) d + O O O Pd 9 fa 0o ntG9 x.w•Ud•. ..dU .3 d U r4 d t+ O U > pvv d r4A d Ll o 60 yo w a 0 ) U C '+dd G. d No1 � r.4 cn0) a1 t+ f, C-4 a 0+N M 0 oo0) a NO4 O o ov .4 r4 O cM + SVr+ av , tNGN�o Y, V Q � oP moa tor H tta En N N N N NV2 to y N to CO N N � to Er, to N � y N � W Vl Ove. O (on -Cj O 'Cl) AO � N 00 O O e0 In O 1n to O O 5!'1Lm Ln cn O u ra 09 cn O a N 3' 0, Ln r� O rt O r� O 00 00 H O N 00 OD r (n r0 c Q + N 6� In r< 1n O O �D.N M Sn 1n M M �O 00 CoM to O a N O Cr,Sf• N ^ `D N 3 M r1 H tT aD H r'S O• r4 r-•5 rd r-i ra r-i r•5 ra H *"c (] N M O ra r! N M rl M U•1 D $ r-5 G• H H r-4 rd ra r1 O+ H CT• r-5 r-5 t♦ r-{ r•'i W d r, H H O O ..+ u) > 41 &) o r-5 co 0 0 p, V 0) o �, �' c. > N U, y N N N ri 0) U G+ 0) 0) O d 0 G U r-5 1-400 to x u ac 0 x A ci `° "' 'e E u Na t) 060 a t+ u y N v o N ad aJ C .+�. 0) 4 N O 0) C .1E .d 0 O d) i+ G d 0) u) b d vi u1 U to O O) O O C J 0) N ra 9 O 0) W i+ .'� 0 r-5 .0 O a 'O 7 U G 1 ,d O U Ea ® 9 Z 9C a H U H.+ Q N C L+ U to (-t 0 A H 1.4 U d H pO o y, tJP L 0y r-< � .t3 C 7t� N � � v •SL fJ d 07 07 U p t+ U U 0 O U 2I d d .�! G d >> O Cd U of PG LT+ G 0) OA.•a R d x a a .5 a t1. C). 0) n1 O d o d •Q 0 d d O d •r° o mw � vwc� � mroUw �sas7onPel N �- v 0 0 0 o 0 aO vt O O 1 a O' - � 1 � Qy .d1 Z H fN U - 91 u, b- ytj ; tn U V tom1 ro .u�y' G.N W W i+ i+ w 4r R+ v 03 0. O O O G+ O U' O U UC-0 Q2 CA H O O O a% N O N O tn O �; N Q @+ t!1 ®+ N •'D D i0 N N 60 0 14 41 ji F 4: } 4 41 U C+ U 60 W e N S! N 1 0o e e ..a o O tn O o WG e tiiANH Gt-u� 0 E �,. ` �. ?`?,moi-. ^F uv +� � » .,� _ � �, c-r•. �. e, ," w.� ,N%"'.n E5', �d.,r.- .,na.<, ,.'� ��:.� �t,,..;�K��'�,� '' e r rs S n :Y x � alt "�'r" IRS •_. v'` £� '``FYX ''� � ,s,=:r ��,��.�, kx �s3�cy��'� ��x 5r �x: � -5,. s � ,�;,•:'? - �,� �`�-,,�`'. ,��'t--s._ ��,+ �"�s�:,�' 3 ��5�,�� ',��'`� OWN Ira .-,-4 V-11 M%k Yiz yt�-5�^c� �...�:rfi�•`�,.� "r `+ids. �� s��'�r k� t��•-ids_ �dr� � _. tea,.a r �4 ��a i`��`�•vS,3+i�'�a�s'�-,n1f�`�i'�c;2 r� i PLANNING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MARCH 1984 Attached is the Planning Commission minutes for March 6, 1984. Also attached are decisions made by the Director for 1-Temporary Use, 2 `Home Occupation Permits, 5 Site Development Reviews, 2`Minor Land Partitions, and two 2 Variance applications which were acted on during March and April. There was no action taken ,by the Hearings Officer for March. r y 5 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION f REGULAR MEETING MARCH 6, 1984 1. President Tepedino calledthe meeting to order at 7:40 P.M. The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School LGI -Room - 10865 SW Walnut, ; Tigard, ;Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Tepedino; Commissioners Butler, Edin, Fyre, Leverett, Moen, Owens, and Peterson. ABSENT: Commissioner Vanderwood. ; i STAFF: Director of Planning & Development Bill. Monahan (arrived 8:00 'P.M.) ; Associate Planner Keith Liden; Secretary Diane M. Jelderks; City } Attorney Adrianne Brockman. r i; 3. Minutes from February 21, 1984wereconsidered. commissioner Owens moved for approval as submitted. Commissioner 'Moen seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION x a Associate Planner Keith Liden stated Titan Properties had asked for a clarification of the motion for Colony Creek II, III, IV. Was it the P.C.'s intent to delete lots based on 6.3.2 only or was it to do with established areas. 0 Discussion followed. Consensus was deletion was for .the established . area. . E ® Walt Munhall presented Space Needs for City of Tigard. —Discussion followed. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 1-84, SUBDIVISION S 4-84 ROSEBUD ENTERPRIZES q NPO 07. { Request for detailed plan approval of a Planned Development and Preliminary Plat Approval for a 32-lot single family residential , development utilizing "0" foot side yards. r w LOCATION: Northeast of the intersection of 106th Avenue and S.W. Diamond Way. ; ® Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval with conditions noting changes applicant made to conform to Planning Commission motion from February 21st P.C. meeting. sl a Applicant's Presentation, Mel Stout rep. Rosebud. Concurred with staff's recommendation. PAGE 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 1984 PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No appeared to speak. a Commissioner Butler questioned if the flood level had been resolved. Discussion followed between applicant, staff and Commissioners. ® Commissioner Owens questioned if the NPO #7 concern for undercutting of stream bank had been addressed. Applicant stated it had, 0 Commissioner Edin asked if the street configuration - had to be developed as shown. Applicant stated this was done this 'way because they ;did not own adjoining property. a Discussion and comments on Commissioner Butler's issues which he had asked to be addressed. (see memo) PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION 0 Commissioner.. Moen questioned if it is normal procedure to submit a sensitive lands permit application prior to submittal of a subdivision application. 'Discussion followed. - ® Commissioner Butler questioned if the greenway would be dedicated to City. ' Staff stated it would.. ® Commissioner Moen moved for approval of the detailed plan (PD 1-84). and the preliminary plat (S 4-84) subject to staff's conditions 1 thru 13 and additional conditions 14 and 15. 1. The final subdivision plat shall be submitted to the Planning Director within one year of Planning Commission approval. 2. The final plat shall contain 32 lots as shown on the preliminary plat revised by the applicant on February 26, 1984. 3. Plans for a fence along the west side of 106th Avenue including written permission of the property owners involved in Black Bull Park, shall be provided in conjunction with the final plat. In lieu of the fence, a plan for a landscaped buffer shall be provided. 4. A homeowners association or equivalent assurance shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, for the maintenance of the vegetation on the west side of 106th Avenue. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of landscaping within the right-of-way. 5. The sidewalk may be deleted on the west side of 106th Avenue up to the southwestern corner of Lot 32. Sidewalks shall be provided throughout the remainder of the subdivision as per City standards t PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1984 6. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered civil engineer, detailing all proposed pubic improvements shall be submitted to the City's Engineering Division for review. 7. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence s until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public ' improvement plans." The Engineering Division will require posting of a 100`x, performance bond, the payment of a ipermit fee and a sign installation/streetlight deposit. Also, the execution of a street openingpermit or construction compliance agreement just prior to, or at the time of, it's issuance of approved public improvement plans. 8. The final subdivision plat shall be recorded with Washington ' County prior to the: issuance of any building permits. 9. No changes or modifications shall be made to approved plans without written approval from the appropriate City department. 10. Survey Conditions: ' a.- Vertical Datum shall be City of Tigard (N.G.S. 1929) . All existing and established (temporary) bench marks in the vicinity of the project shall be shown on the construction drawing. b. Compliance of 18.160.160 (all) with the following exceptions: 18.160.160 A.2 Capped 5/8^ x 30" Iron Rods on surface of final lift will be acceptable. NOTE 1.8.160.160 B.1 City of Tigard Primary Control Surveys (CS. 9 19,947 & 20,223) Local—Ground coordinates exist for all stations. State plan coordinates not required. City can make transformation given local coordinates. C. Compliance with Section 18.160.190 (B) : 18.160.190 Filing and Recording B. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall submit to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. d. All sanitary and storm locations shall be placed in positions that do not interfere with centerline monumantation. PAGE 3 PLANNING COMPASSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 1984 21 11. Deed restrictions shall be recorded with Washington County which assure that: a. The -10 feet- separation between the residential structures shall remain in perpetuity; b. The 10 feet separation between the residential structures shall be maintained free from any obstructions other than: (1) The eaves of the structure; (2) A chimney which may encroach into the setback area by net more than 2 feet; z (3) ,A swimming- pool; - t (4) Normal landscaping; or. € (5) ,A garden wall or fence equipped with a gate for emergency access and maintenance purposes; ana 12. Easements shall be granted where any portion of the structure or j architectural feature projects over a property line. rage for zero-lot line shall not exceed the 13. The maximum lot cove maximum lot coverage for the base zone. 14. Floor level of houses will be as stated in the approved Jsensitive lands permit. 15. Applicant will provide rip-rap along northwest portion of property. 0 Commissioner Edin seconded. a Motion carried unanimously. 5.2 ZONE CHrLNGE ZC 3-84, SUBDIVISION S 3-84 ROBERT RANDALL CO. NPO #6 Request for a zone change from R-12 (Residential, 12 units/acre) to R-7 (Residential, 7 units/acre) and for preliminary plat approval for a 49 lot subdivision. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Hall blvd. and Durham Road, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11DD, Tax Lot 200) . 0 Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval with ten conditions per staff report. He also stated that the State Highway had three conditions that staff would recommend be included. a NPO Comments, Dave Atkinson, NPO #6 concurred with staff on the density. They did have a concern for a buffer, however, because of lower density it isn't required. Another concern was the PAGE-4 PLANNING COMMISSION (MINUTES MARCH 6, 1984 - -- -� Mao -0ma ad Adm_ . _ ,-�. - lack of a load limit on Durham. This would 'make it difficult to sell the homesalong Durham Road. r .vPLICAver'.S PRESEMITATION a William Cox, 9500 SW ,Barbur Blvd. , representing Robert Randall Co. ,, requested an -interpretation of the Conversion/Buffer factor. He did not feel it was applicable to their project and would create a hardship. They have already included the state c' Highway Department's conditions into their proposal, PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No one appeared to'speak. r i CROSS EXAM AND REBUTTAL e President Tepedino asked staff to comment on buffer factor. e Planning Director Monahan explained if the intent of the Code f was met, an exception should be allowed. e CommissionerButler questioned requiring signalization at Durham , a and Hall. Discussion` followed. e Discussion followed regarding screening and buffering. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION e Commissioner Fyre moved for approval of Zone Change ZC 3-84 and Subdivision S 3-84, subject to staff's conditions, eliminating condition 02, regarding density transition. Conditions: 1. The applicant obtain final plat approval prior to development of ; the property. 2. A school impact letter shall be submitted prior to final plat i approval. 3. The small parcel south of IOt 48 shall be included. 4. A 10--foot wide landscaped screen shall be provided for Lots 29, 30,' 31, 48, and 49 as required in Chapter 18.100 of the Code. i Plans for the landscaping shall be submitted as part of the } final plat approval process. 5. Severs (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered civil engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the City's Engineering division for review. Said plans shall be consistent with Engineering Division comments noted in A. 6. above. PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 1984 � ®s mz- i �v f 6. Construction of proposed public; improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public t improvement plans. The Engineering Division will require posting of a 100' performance bond, the pay •a..t of '- permit, fee € and a sign installation/street light deposit. Also, the 6 execution of a street opening permit or construction ,comptiance agreement just prior to, or at the time of, it's issuance of approved public improvement plans. 7. The final subdivision plat shall be recorded with Washington County prior to the issuance of any building permits. 8. No changes or modifications shall be made to approved plans r�- without written approval from the appropriate City department. 9. Survey Conditions: a. Vertical Datum'shall' be City of Tigard (N.G.S. 1929) • All existing and established' (temporary) bench marks in the ' vicinity of the project shall be shown ontheconstruction drawing. b. Compliance of 18.160.160 (all) with the following exceptions: 18.160.160 A.2 Capped 518" x 30" iron Rods on surface of final lift will be acceptable. NOTE 18.160.160 B.1 City of Tigard Primary Control Surveys (CS. l 19.947 & 20,223) Local-Ground coordinates exist for a12 stations. State plan coordinates not required. City can make transformation given local coordinates. C. Compliance with section 18.160.190 (B): 18 160 190 Filing and Recording B. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall submit to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. d. All sanitary and storm locations shall be placed in positioas that do not interfere with centerline monumentation. 10. State Highway Conditions: a. Additional right-of-way will be dedicated if less than 40 feet from centerline. PAGE 6 - PLANNING COMI41SSION MINUTES'- MARCH 6, 1984 - - __--- 4 ' b. Half streetimprovement to State Highway standards including a` bike path. C. An access permit from State 'Highway Division. 11. ` Staff and applicant and Washington County to meet to determine si need for signalization at Hall and Durham. ® Commissioner Peterson seconded. i Commissioner Owens questioned the need for a wall along Durham. Discussion followed' between -- staff, NPO, applicant and Commissioners. g Commissioner Edin did not support having the applicant pay ,for signalization at Hall and Durham. m Legal Counsel advised the Commission that they could not require applicant to pay for signalization without including other developers or consulting other jurisdictions. • Motion approved by majority vote. Commission Edin` voted N0. g 5.3 SUBDIVISION S 5-84, VARIANCE V 2-84 HALBERG HOMES NPO 06 Request for preliminary plat approval of a 5I-1ot subdivision, a variance to permit the setback requirements of the R-7 zone, and to z allow for "0" foot side yard setbacks within the subdivision. Also, the Planning Department requests consideration of a zone change from R-12 to R-7 in lieu of the variance application. LOCATION:' west side of Hall blvd. , 600 feet north of Durham Road (Tax Map 2SI 11DD, Tax Lot 100) . t o Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval with conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION 0 David Evans, concurred with the staff recommendation. PUBLIC TESTIMONY - No one appeared to speak. CROSS EX-AMINATION AND REBUTTAL ® Discussion followed regarding revised plan. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION 0.: commissioner .But]er would like to .see same conditions applied. to this application as the previous application. PAGE 7 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1984 EMT NMI ® Commissioner Butler moved to approve Subdivision S 5--84 with the following conditions: Conditions: 1. The applicant obtain final plat approval prior to development of the property. 2. The proposed lot configuration shall be modified in order to comply with the City's density transition provisions '(18.40.040) 3. Seven (7) sets of; plan-profile public improvement construction' plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered civil engineer, detailing all proposed ,public improvements shall be ` submitted :to the City's ' Engineering division for review. Said plans shall be consistent with Engineering Division comments noted in A. 6. above. 4. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public improvement "plans`. The Engineering Division will require posting of a`100%-`performance"bond, the 'payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/street light deposit. Also, the execution of' a street opening permit or 'construction compliance agreement just prior to, or at the time of, it's issuance of approved public improvement plans. 5. The final subdivision plat shall be recorded with Washington County prior to the issuance of any building permits. 6. No changes or modifications shall be made to approved plans without written appruval from the appropriate City department. 7. Survey Conditions: a. Vertical Datum shall be City of Tigard (N.G.S. 1929) . All existing and established (temporary) bench marks in the vicinity of the project shall be shown on the construction drawing. b. Compliance of 18.160.160 (all) with the following exceptions: 18.160.160 A.2 Capped 5/8" x 30" Iron Pods on surface of final lift will be acceptable. NOTE 18.160.160 B.1 City of Tigard Primary Control Surveys (CS. 0 19,941 & 20,223) Local-Ground coordinates exist for all stations. State plan coordinates not required. City can make transformation given local coordinates. PAGE 8 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE'S MARCH 6, 1984 I C. Compliance with Section 18.160.190 (B): 18.160.190 Filing and Recording t B. Upon final recording with the County, the applicant shall _submit; to the City a mylar copy of the recorded final plat. d. A11 sanitary and storm locations shall be placed in interfere with centerline positions that do not monumentation. 8. Deed restrictions shall be recorded with Washington County which assure that: a. The 10 feet separation between the residential structures G; shall remain in perpetuity; 4 b. The 10 feet separation between the residential structures } om any obstructions other than: shall be maintained free fr t- (1) The eaves of the structure; 2) R chimney which may encroach into the setback area by f a not more than 2 feet; ; (3) A swimming pools g (4) Normal landscaping; or , i (5) A garden wall or .fence equipped with a gate for t emergency access and maintenance purposes; and 9. Easements shall be granted where any portion of the structure or f architectural feature projects over a property line. rage for zero-lot line shall not exceed the 10. The maximum lot cove1 maximum lot coverage for the base zone. 11. Staff and applicant and Washington. County to meet to determine � need for signalization at Hall and Durham. 0 Commissioner Moen seconded.. ®. Commissioner Owens questioned the alignment of the street. Discussion followed. 0 i4otion carried unanimously. 5.4 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS - NPO # 1, 5 & 6 Director Monahan made the -interview Committee's recommendation for appointment. Wyffels running for Mayor. If he should win a Discussion on Mr. he would have to resign. PAGE 9 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1984 t ® Commissioner .Owens moved to forward recommendation to appoint applicants to appropriate NPO's. Commissioner Eain seconded. ® Motion carriedunanimously to appoint the following. Edward D. Duffield, ,8895 SW Edgewood, NPO #1 Robert C. Wyffels, 8995 SW'Edgewood, NPO #1 Harry Sporata, ,7745 SW Gentlewoods, NPO 95 _ Murel Gillen, 14936 SW 109th, NPO #6 55 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 1-84 CITY OF TIGARD NPO 03 ': Washington County Planning Staff recently completed 'a review of the City's Comprehensive Plan. One concern is that there are 5 lots within the City's Urban Growth Boundary under County jurisdiction which do not have City Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations on them. The lots (shown on the attached map Exhibit "A^) are Tax Lots c, 400, 500, 501, 502' and 503 on Washington' County' Tax Map 2SI 4. ` The City Staff and County Staff are in agreement that the low density plan designation'would be appropriate for these lots. g ® Director Monahan made staff's recommendation for ,approval. , g k NPO COMMENT - Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3, supported staff's recommendation. g PUBLIC TESTIMONY €� a Robert Ludlum, currently has a forest land deferral and was concerned he would loose this designation. Discussion followed. r: PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION ® Discussion followed regarding protecting forest land deferral. F i ® Commissioner Moen moved to forward a recommendation to the City Council approving the low density residential plan designation i for the properties located on Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 4, lot 400, 500, 501, 502 and 503. With respect to lot 500, he requested staff to research tax deferral status and provide information to City Council. x ® Commissioner Owens seconded. ® Motion carried unanimously. k President Tepedino announced that, unless there is any objection he was changing ,the (-rder of the Public 'Hearing. Item 5.8 would become 5.6 and 5.9 would become 5.7 because of the number of individuals present who wanted to speak on these issues. E PAGE 10 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 1984 5.6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT S 8-83 PD (Park Place) NPO #3 The applicant is requesting conceptual and detailedplan approval of a planned development and preliminary plat approval of Phase I, . consisting of 39 units.` LOCATION: 13900 'SW 121st Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map ,2S1 3CC, Tax Lot 401 and 2S1 =4 Tax Lot 1400) . _ e Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval with conditions. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Mike Bain, Century 21 Properties, reviewed history of the project and changes which had been incorporated and addressed. NPO COiLHENTS Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW - Walnut, NFO #3, unanimously supported the application.- He then addressed issues ` of concern which had been resolved. PUBLIC TESTIMONY a Betty McCain,; 13950 SW 121st, opposed the application. She felt . the density violated the Established Area policy. Also opposed, the "'i" on Gaarde. ® Ralph Blower, 11700 SW Gaarde, opposed the project because Of street alignment. He submitted a June 6, 1978 letter from Washington County concerning the future alignment of the extension of 135th and proposed assurances. ® . Kevin Martin, Washington County, opposed this development due to the fact that the street design is inconsistent with the Washington County Comprehensive Plan. CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL ® Discussion followed regarding additional information submitted and City Council's direction. • Discussion followed on how to proceed with this application. ® Bob Bledsoe, NPO 03, reviewed Comprehensive Plan process and, pointed out that this application was in conformance yrith the adopted Comprehensive Plan. m Commissioner Edin questioned if staff was requiring half-street improvements on both sides of 121st. Discussion followed. Streets would probably be 3/4 improved. f : 4v ' e Lengthy discussion followed regarding the private streets. PACE 11 -- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1984 4 a:a 4 f u Mrs. McCain asked if a guard: rail could be installed to replace F `trees: which have been protecting her house. private street ® Further discussion on comparisons were done between London Sq'. and proposed project. 4 - PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED i i Commissioner Butler asked that a condition be added regarding maintenance of the private street. Commissioner Moen had concerns regarding private streets. ' s ` ® Commissioner Eyre felt that the plan was a compromise. He was concerned with private streets. Commissioner Peterson also was concerned about private 'streets . Also he would like to see sidewalks. g ® Commissioner. Edin was also concerned regarding private' street. He> was"also -concerned with Mr. Flower's testimony, and wanted to €; a see it resolved. ' ® Commissioner Leverett favored. 0 Commissioner Owens felt the road issuemust be resolved between the City and County.' She was also concerned with private roads and had other concerns she felt she was not able to address during cross examination and rebuttal. c, Discussion followed regarding the private streets. ® President Tepedino had numerous concerns regarding the roads and. traffic circulation. a Commissioner Leverett moved for approval of S 8-83 per staff's i recommendation and conditions. ® Commissioner Edin seconded. a Commissioner Peterson stated he would like to see a condition included for sidewalks and to include Mr.. Butler's motion for maintenance of public roads. j 0 commissioner Leverett agreed to add a condition for maintenance ' of private roads, Commissioner Edin seconded. g Motion failed with Commissioners Peterson, Eyre, Tepedino, moon and Owens voting NAY. 0 Commissioner Eyre moved for approval with conditions a Commissioner Edin seconded. PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 1984 - - I mac•-mss•,- ---�-�..... �.. �,. -- . r-�._.n — - i ® Motion failed 4-4. Commissioners Leverett, But'_er, Moen and Owens voting NAY. ® Commissioner Owens moved for denial because of the private street design,_ lack of sidewalks and lack of an agreement between the'City 'and County for the arterial. '. i , ! a Commissioner Moen seconded. a Discussion followed regarding street alignment. R ® Motion failed. Commissioner Leverett, Edin, Peterson, Fyre and Tepedino voting NAY. Commissioner Butler moved for approval' based on Homeowner's By s Laws reflect maintenance requirements, that there is no previous there be 34 ft. formal agreement. for the street alignment, t street, but no -50 ft'. right-of-waY, 12 ft. each ane and four t ft. sidewalks. g Motion failed for lack of second. { g Commissioner Moen moved for approval of conceptual and :detailed of planned development approval and preliminary plat app Phase I of S 8-83 PD subject to staff's, conditions and the following ;conditions.' Conditions: 1. the Homeowner Association By Laws will reflect that maintenance of private streets and dedicated open space, recreational areas ` or private mini park be the sole responsibility of the fi Homeowners Assoc. with no participation required or needed by the City. 2. Streets will be 24 ft. wide, with four £t. sidewalks on both € sides of tracks A & C, and sidewalks on one side of track B. { i 3. Garages will be located 20' to outside edge of sidewalk. 0 Commissioner Butler seconded. i. 0 motion carried, Commissioner Owens voting NAY. �. `r 5.7 RESIDENTIAL HOMES ZOA 4-84 a Director Monahan explained that residential homes fall under the home occupation portion of the Code. Issue to deal with is does the Planning Commission feel that the home occupation is a commercial venture and if language . in the Code is adequate to handle the Issue. Carolyn Eadon, representing NPO #1, supported staff's recommendation. - PAGE 13 - PLANNING COMMISSION 14INUTES MARCH b, 1984 10 Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3 'representative,_ said they voted unanimously to support the Planning Director's recommendation. a Also requested under criteria to limit # of employees not related by family. ® Glen Haddock, 10495 SW: Walnut, Consultant for Elderly Care, - reviewedSenate Bill 478,`; stating it is a 'residential'_use not a commercial use, and that City Code prohibits this type of use. a Ferd Moreno, 14430 SW McFaland, supported Fir. Haddock's statements. m Roger Anderson, 10120 SW Kabel 'St. , representing'.:Jolene Carlson, reviewed City Council action and request. He felt this hearing was premature. He did not support staff's recommendation that these fall under Home Occupation permits. Asked the Commission to do nothing.: 9" Bill Milam, .1737 SE 106th, Portland, opposed being a '_Home Occupancy. w Darlene Ball did not feel this hearing reflected what City Council wanted'. Proposed postponement. ®:. Commissioner .Moen .moved to continue. Public Hearing to April 3, 1984 and requested staff to obtain from City Council specific direction as to what they want. e Commissioner Owens seconded. a Commissioner Edin commented he had attended the City Council meeting and the issue was not formulated. a Lengthy discussion followed. 0 Motion carried unanimously.. 0 Commissioner Moen moved to continue 5.6 and 5.7 to April 3, 1984. 0 Commissioner Owens seconded. ® Motion carried unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS 0 Discussion on whether Planning Commission wants to go on record in support of new City Hall. ® Consensus was that this was not appropriate to do as a group. COMMISSIONER OWENS LEFT AT 12:20 P.M. ---- rus..ci.Nas 2iUJVtiCiCiGU AT 12:24 P.H. (DJ:pm/0362P) PAGE 14 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1984 I 4. r z PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO ( Notice of Decision by Director of Planning and Development HOME OCCUPANCY PERMIT HOP 2-84 Empire Carpet CleanersNPO # 6' The Director has approved a .Rome occupancy Permit .for Empire Carpet Cleaners , (ken Allen) to operate a carpet an upholster cleaning service. Located at: 12050 SW Burlheights (Wash. Co. Tax Map` 1S1 34CA lot 800). The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement ,of conditions can be obtained from the Planning ;Department, 'Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW 'Ash, 'P.O. Box 23397,' Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on March 22, 1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with P section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the 'Community Development code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadlineforfiling,of an appeal is March 22, 1984. s, The hearing on an appeal will be,De Novo. r LEDDAKOTA5 W ! I s T A D IV — U SU I!E f-A 3T 3 N TIGARD' w t E ON p _ — i ST ET oP I I ¢ I � TT publish 2-9-84 (0288P) T Place under City of Tigard Logo TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TU 4-84 Sharon Roberts PET PREVENT-A-CARE NPO # 3 The Director of planning and Development has approved a Temporary Use ,Permit to allow 'three `vaccination clinics at Canterbury 'Square on 4/18/84, 6/9/84 and 11/17/84 on property zoned CG (Commercial General) located at 14365 SW Pacific= Highway (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2Sl 10A, tax lot 1700). The adopted finding ;of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the .Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O.' Box 23397, Tigard, ,Oregon 97223. The decision shall ,be final on April 16,, 1984. Any party to the decision may :appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, which provides that a' written appeal may be filed' within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for 'filing of an appeal is April 16, 1984. The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. C•aPw'F - 4 SITE TT public April 5, 1984 Place Under City of Tigard Logo HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT HOP 4-84 FERD MORENO NPO # 3 The Planning Director has approved a Home Occupation Permit to operate a Residential Home for the handicapped on property zoned R-2 located at, 14430 S.W. McFarland (Wash. Co.' Tax-Map 2SI 10BA;lot`3800). The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Departmexit, Tigard City Hall, ;12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, 'Oregon 97223. The decision shall be -final on April 30, 1984. Any party to the decision may ;appeal this decision in accordance with section .18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community, Development code,' which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The 'deadline for filing of an appeal is April 30, 1984. The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. sr 11 o ST TT Publish April 19, 1984 PLACE UNDER CITY.OF TIGARD LOGO Notice of Decision by Director of Planning and Development Y - SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 16-83 Sears & Chung Designers/Time Oil NPO # 5 y: F The Director has approved with conditions a request to remodel an existing service station ;to include a quick-stop mini-mart. Located at: 15900 SW Upper Boones Feery Road (2S1 12D, Tax 'Lot 1800) } The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning .Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397,' Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on March' 12, 1984. Any; party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community development 'Code, ' which provides that a'written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice I is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is March 12, 1984. The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. III_ S. 'K81E LM x � -1I a F m � TT publish 3-1-84 0270P Place under City of Tigard Logo R i } } SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 2-84 OREGON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION NPO # 4 The Director of Planning and Development has approved a Site Development (' Review to construct an office buildingand related improvements on property 1 zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) located on the southwest corner of SW 66th Ave. and SW Franklin St., Tigard (Wash. Co'. Tax Map 2S1 IAA, lot numbers 6700-7200 inclusive). ,? - The adopted finding of facts, decision and 'statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City; Hall, 12755 SW Ash, -P.O. s; Box 23397, : Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on April> 20, k; 1984. Any 'party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with g section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, which provides that a written appeal may, be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is April 20, 1984. The hearing, on an appeal will be De .Novo. g _ 7- ANKH }$ PHIL9T [ k \��' WNSK 5>. N• VT N � T[E TT publish April 10, 1984 - 1; x. -- Place Under City of Tigard Logo SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 3-84 VARIANCE V 4-84 EDWARD LILLY AND JOSEPH HOGAN NPO # 2 The Planning Director has given site development approval to construct two warehouse buildings ,and related improvements and' a Variance to vary the rear yard setback when adjacent to residential zones from 50 to 43 feet. The property is zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and is located at 11225 SW Greenburg Road, ,Tigard, OR (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35CA tax'lot 700). The adopted finding of facts, 'decision and statementof conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, ;Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on AprEl 16, 1984. Any party to the decision may 'appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is 'given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is April 16, 1984. The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. ITnioa 1 zoz elle. ^ .eur Ji).. 23-65.; Ir 1.SC •i. 400 0\ �'• III { I•� 3lK � b a > iooi TT Publish April 3, 1984 . E, Place Under City of Tigard Logo 4 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 4-84 R.D. WEIGEL INVESTMENT/NW FARMERS INSURANCEGROUP NPO # 4 } _ The Planning Director has given Site Development Review approval with conditionstoconstruct two office buildings and related improvements on property zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) located on the north side of SW Hampton, between 66th and 68th Ave., Tigard (Wash. Co. Tox Map 2S1 IAD Tax s Lots 1100 and 1200). The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, ; Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box '23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on April 23, 1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with = R section 18.32-290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 nays after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing; of an appeal is April 23, 1984. € The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. F �.N 5 � i PHIL o er cE e LEWIS L E M. TT Publish April 12, 1984 {{ C. , fi a Place under City of Tigard Logo SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 5-84 DAVIDSON RESTAURANT NPO # 1 The Director of Planning and Devel'opment's has approved a Site ` Development Review to add 1,128 sq. ft. to an existing restaurant on property zoned C—G (Commercial General). Located at 12830 SW Pacific Hwy.', Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 -2BD, 'tax lot 1701). The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the 'Planniag Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision 'shall be final on April 23, 1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community- Development code, which provides that'a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is April 23,' 1984. The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. '�( T1tG[A,f2d '•.x 1- //.off TT publish April 12, 1984 Place Under City of Tigard Logo e, MINOR LAND PARTITION/Lot Line Adjustment MLP 1-84 TITAN PROPERTIES, INC NPO # 5 (COLONY CREEK) The Planning Director has given approval for a request to adjust four parcels of 0.35, 0.22, 5.05, and 2.49 acres into four parcels of 0.31, 0.26, 5.1 and 2.45 acres followed by an adjustment and partition of the rsulting 0.31 and 0.26 'acre parcels into three lots of 7650, 7200, and 3325 square feet in the R-7 ,(Residential, 7 units/acre) zone on property located on the west side of SW Hall Blvd., 200 feetnorth of SW Greensward Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12BB; tax lots 101, 102, 3600 and 3700). The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on April 20, 1984• Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, be filed within ZO days after notice which provides that a 'written appeal may is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is April 20, 1984. The:hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. SITE BOMITA 5 M. TT Publish April 10, 1984 it -- r Place under City of Tigard Logo MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 10-83 Kenneth Bouman NPO #5 The Director of Planning and Development has approved Minor Land Partition MLP 10-84 with conditions to partition; one parcel of 37,462 sq. ft. into .three parcels of 8,400, 8,400 and 20,662 sq. ft.. The property is located at 15940 SW '76th 'Ave. (Wash. Co. Tax Map',2S1 12CD, tax lot 700) The adopted finding of facts, 'decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box' 23397, Tigard, Oregon' 97223. The decision shall be final on March 26, 1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community,Development code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after 'notice' is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is March 26,- 1984.` The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. TdiiL. -T J9 W� TT public Marsh 13, 1984 Place under City of Tigard Logo. VARIANCE V 3-84 Waverly Construction Co. Bond Park NPO # 5 The Director of Planning and Development has denied a request to vary the garage setback from .20 to 18 feet and droved a variance for sideyard (corner lot) on lots ;l, 12, and 13 to allow 10-foot setback where a 15 foot setback was previously granted. Property is located ,at 7895 SW Bond Bond ` Street. (Wash. Co. Tax Map;2S1 12CD, tax lot '600 and 1400). The adopted finding of facts, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box`'23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on March 26, 1984. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with section 18.32.290(A) and section 18.32.370 of the Community Development code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for ;filing of an appeal is March 26, 1984. The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. s �\ TT public March 13, 1984 _ Place under City of Tigard Logo VARIANCE V 5-84 Jack Durrett NPO # 7 to vary the t and Development has approved ate request distance The Director of Planning street side ,yard setback from 15 to l0 ft. and to vary 4 between a 'primary building and accessory structure located from cto11960 ".SWa 121st R-4.5 (Residential 4.5 nits/acre) 'zone on property Avenue, Tigard (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34, lot 3700)• } decision and statement of co,,ditions can be 4 The adopted finding of facts, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P-0- obtained from the Planning Department, g i, Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The deals thision decishall ion finaaccordance l with 1984.' Any ;party to the decision ma18.y ,aPP section 1832.290(A) and section eal3may7beofiled wthe ithin110 days lafter tnotice which provides that a written PP appeal is April 20, 1984• is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an The hearing on an appeal will be De Novo. El Ii — s _ i ® ST 33 34 = {; s ( x. f S N ] ]T[CJ ff.-F77 E 7-771 E I TT Publish April 10, 1984 U° » W Go U � � � U vT C-s O w m kA IR3...VHS p" 6>d ca O - H � O � O H � ca � U 41 -Aj 41 ccId ca 9zO02 1 Aj .;j 41 41 H 0 ca Q O V U O. � c to cl Da of m t N 41 to U 42 Q2 Aj 0 4J 4J (. 4J 41 41 41 f4 R9 � CA e3 W H co k � " d alt N 1 t. - Mi Nf Q N J f O O w i fes.. cd :ar N 4..: ar to U V r m t IV x rz a w m c ;4 P O r� w m m m r m m c C C C C C.. ar CD CD 91. cw C6 C, w r1�6�Frj a H C 02 ro Z y a to O ro a w �° x° a ro ° o ° y ba Cd y b vr. °60 tE 4 0 0 :9 ar H d H W H U�6 Q tl U e rn � rn 14 ri i 00 I Par. iL R'. 47 O N V1 rl dJ rl Wd 14 N �,t en 4N Gr iI N m N 14 r4 14 cT n0 co cJ d ab co co m Go 1 1 OD I cv 10 O N N - �..� .,...�� WLMWE—WE, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Members of the City Council FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development DATE: April 19, ; 1984 SUB ECT: Economic Development Committee Report This is the first report concerning the activities of our newly formed Economic DevelopmentCommittee. : The Committee met both on February 16 and March '14, 1984. f Attached for your information are copies of the minutes from;thesemeetings ti as well as a survey circulated to 50 Tigard Businesses. The survey will be analyzed then sent out to all identified Tigard Businesses in April. I will provide you with a copy of the committee minutes and publications monthly. i I L' ' TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOP111ENT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY i6, 1984 7:30 A.M., ELMER'S RESTAURANT ,x Members Present: Wilbur A. Bishop, Bruce P. Clark, Jim Corliss, Amo De Bernardis, Patrick Kennedy, Tony Orlandini, Mark Padgett, and WilliamMonahan, ex-officio. Other,Present: Geraldine Ball, Iry Larson The initial' meeting of the Economic Development Committee was devoted to an introduction of the new members and an overview of what Tigard has done in terms of economic development in the past. Mayor Bishop and Bill Monahan provided the background information concerning the formation of the committee, prior,` activities' of the Economic Development Steering Committee,` and the purpose of the new committee. A copy of the Economy ;element of the comprehensive plan was distributed. The Committee directed the Planning Department to prepare a questionnaire to distribute , to Tigard :based businesses. The questionnaire will ask what positive and negative conditions exist for a company doing 'business in the City. The 'purpose is to help the City remove any obstacles which exist which j may block 'development. A later survey for consumers and "shoppers was also discussed. Questi:,as such as "What do you like and dislike about shopping in Y Tigard" would be asked. The Planning Department will prepare and distribute the questionnaire to businesses selected from those companies which pay a Business Tax in the City. The Committee suggested that the staff provide a briefing of the economic r situation in Tigard. At the next meeting the staff will display maps to familiarize the committee with the community. Maps showing zoning, comprehensive plan designations, vacant ;land, and transportation will be shown. Later the Committee hopes to meet with representatives of surrounding cities to coordinate efforts. T After each meeting a press release will be prepared and distributed telling the public what activities the Committee is involved in. The releases will stress the backgrounds of members as well as the fact that the Committee is a community based groups with participation by at-large members. The goals of the program will be those of the citizens, not the committee only. r At the next meeting Bill will report on budgetary considerations and what '' resources are available to the committee. s 4. The Committee deferred the election of officers until the next meeting to & . allow the two members, yet to be appointed, to participate. 1 t. The next meeting will be held on Wednesday morning, March 14, 1984 at 7:30 A.M. at Elmer's Restaurant. Future meetings beginning in April will be held on the third Wednesday of the month. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 A.M. (WAM:pm/0325P) WE 00=1 IN ,. TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MARCH 14, 1984 7:30 A.M. ,, ELMER'S RESTAURANT Members Present: Wilbur A Bishop; Bruce P. Clark; Jim Corliss; Amo De Bernardis'; Patrick Kennedy; Bob Nunn; Tony ,Orlandini; Mark Padgett; and William Monahan, ex-officio. Others Present: Geraldine Ball; Iry Larson; and Bob Jean, City Administrator. Bill Monahan opened the meeting by introducing the newest at-large member of the Committee, , Bob Nunn. He then discussed a package of handouts which included 1) a copy of the survey which has been _circulated to fifty Tigard sample businesses; 2) the:, March 6, ' 1984 Tigard Times Articles on, the Committee; 3) the Chamber newsletter of March 1, 1984 articles on:;the TVEDC and the Committee; and 4) an article from the Daily Journal' of Commerce on economic development. ' Bill then explained three maps prepared by the City as part of its Comprehensive Plan, 1) Comprehensive -Plan Map; 2) Transportation Map; and 3) Buildable Lands. Bob Jean gave an overview of why the Committee was formed and its role. He explained that he sees the Committee as an action committee which" will cgive direction to City staff. The Committee needs to form a strategy, ;apply facts supplied by the staff, aad use the particular` knowledge brought to the Committee by each member from his business or background. Bob explained the regional issues and the emphasis which is being placed on the Sunset corridor. He noted that activity in the Tualatin and Sherwood area to bring over 1000 acres of industrial land into the market with full services will have a great impact. Tigard needs to find out what new industries need t business. Since Tigard is a full-service and provide it tc them to attrac city with a low tax rate, the City should be able to attract further economic development. Even if the 1 1/26 tax cap is voted in, Tigard, with a stronger underlying value, will be able to offer greater services to the population than other cities. The reason for the advantage is the existing strength which Tigard has due to the high percentage of overall land value which is represented by commercial and industrial uses. Annexation policy is one area that the Committee should become involved. A discussion then ensued concerning where further annexation activity should take place. It was stressed that a balance of commercial and residential development would best serve the City, however, transportation systems must be put in place to serve the future uses. The Committee, Bob said, may need to advocate comprehensive plan changes before the Planning Commission to encourage further economic development in future annexation areas. The need is for a balance between residential and commercial concerns so that Tigard can continue to maintain its strong tax base and provide services. Too much residential development without adequate new commercial growth could adversely affect the tax base. Amo pointed out that the Committe needs to react to information generated by the City stafftobe effective. Bob agreed, however, the Committee must set an agenda for the next 6-12 months outlining its proposed activities. The staff can then provide the data needed. the Committee has been established with no set agenda, it is up to the Committee to choose a plan of action. 5 Economic Dev. Comm. Minutes March 14, 1984 Page 2 The election of officers was held to choose a chairman and vice-chairman.: After much discussion, it was decided that the chairman should be a Tigard businessman who gill'- be appointed for an interim period through, June. This will allow for appointment of the 72nd Avenue representative and the election' of the new Mayor prior to an election for 'full terms of office. Jim Corlis nominated Bruce Clark' for chairman, seconded by Tony Orlandini. Mark Padgett` then nominated Pat Kennedy as vice-chairman, Bruce Clark seconded. The vote was unanimous'to have Bruce and Pat serve in these: capacities through June. Bruce assumed the duties of chairman and stated that the Committee needs to set goals early in the ,process for 'direction. By the next meeting, each K member is asked to come 'back with a list of 'ideas, at least two or three,- which are directions or goals which the Committee should attempt to attain. Committee members should also give 'thought' to what the Committee; should and can do. For instance, should the Committee develop and put out information on the City, supply maps, financial assistance, or set up 'a full scale attraction program? Bob Jean suggested that after the next meeting when the Committee discusses its course of action, he and Bill Monahan meet with Bruce and Pat to discuss the resources available to the Committee to put its ideas into 'motion. He suggested that- the''Committee may choose to bring in an economic development ti consultant to aelp get the goal structure set. r The Committee then discussed the time and place of future meetings. The consensus was that morning meetings are best although the location should vary. The Committee felt that it was best to meet in several different locations to make their presence known in the community. Bill will choose a restaurant each month. Bruce discussed a letter which he wrote concerning the Civic Center election. The consensus of the Committee was that Bill should mention to the press in the regular press release that the Committee feels that the Civic Center is an economic development issue. By building a Civic Center, the City will provide an anchor to the downtown business area. Further business development will be encouraged by this action thus stimulating the revitalization of one of the four target areas. The Civic Center fits into the long range plan for stimulating economic growth in tigard. The Committee was sensitive to the fact that its support of the Civic Center could be construed by some as a political statement, however, that is not the intent of the Committee. The purpose is to support an economic development activity which will help to revitalize the central business district. Bob Nunn suggested that the Committee needs to explain why the City needs economic development, particularly in terms of the necessary balance of business with residential. uses. The purpose of keeping property taxes down should be stressed. The next meeting of the Committee will be held on Wednesday, April 18, 1984 at 7:30 A.M. at a site to be determined by the Planning Director. Members should submit their written ideas about Committee goals to ,Bill by April 11, so that he may put them into a list to be discussed by the Committee. (WAM:pm/0360P) 1 ` I I t ILL CITY OF T167A RD WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON ! MEMORANDUM j CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON _t March 8, 1984 f ; 1 a TO: Tigard Businesses { FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning S Development SUBJECT: Tigard's Economic Development Program ' The City of Tigard has established an Economic Development Committee which is now ,formulating an economic development strategy. One of the first tasks which`' the Committee has decided to undertake is a survey of all businesses located in Tigard to ascertain what factors contribute to or detract from the attractiveness of Tigard, as a place to do business. Specific questions concerning how the City can better provide assistance to businesses desiring to move to, or expand in, Tigard are asked. We would appreciate your input. Your firm has been selected as one of fifty companies in Tigard to test out f the survey. We are attempting to get input from a cross section of companies t from all areas of the city and the business community. Upon receiving the responses to this test survey, we will determine if modifications are necessary prior to circulating the petition to over 500 companies. You may be interested in knowing that the Committee is comprised of nine E members, four representing Tigard's major industrial and commercial centers, three at large members, a commercial banker, and the Mayor. We have attempted to develop a working committee which is , representative of Tigard's diverse economic' interests. During the next several months, the Committee will be , developing a strategy for retaining, enhancing, and attracting industrial and commercial entities to the City. Any information which you may provide concerning community needs, land which is available for development, or contacts which we should make with companies interested in coming to Tigard would be greatly appreciated. _Thank you for being part of the Tigard community. (WAM:pm/0348P) i. r L1'lY UP TP,AKU, UKEt,ON c ECO NOM I( DEVELOPMENT`SUHVEY } a Name of Company:_ Address: s Nature of Business: k 1. How long has your company been located at your present site? 2. Why did your company choose your present site to operate your business? r A. What are the advantages of being in the City of Tigard? (location, local tax rate, city services, employees?) ' B. What are the disadvantages of being in the City? 3. If you have had occasion to deal with City personnel in the development, expansion, or remodel.of your facility, generally what are your feelings? A. The City assisted the company to meet its goals. B. Cit procedures were too time consuming, costly, e City p ii ,g y, or prohibitive. C The City staff were uncooperative. D. Other 4. If you had a Positive experience working with the staff, what do you think are the characteristics' of the staff or the approval process which encourage economic development and/or assisted you? What improvements would yuu suggest? And YM SM 5. ' 1f you had a negative experien:e workine- with the statt , what were the problems which ;you encountered? Whatwas the effect of these problems (foss of time, increased cost', reduced the scope of the project, prevented company action, etc.)? What changes do you suggest for the improvement of the development process? F is 6. What improvements are needed in your -general area which would assist your t business? (For instance: street improvements, traffic controls, or other public improvements?) ; t tl i 7. What suggestions do you have which would assist the Economic Development Committee in its efforts to develop an economic development strategy? To attract new businesses? G 8. Would you or a representative of your company like to be kept informed e the Committee's efforts and progress? If you would like to as the Committee please indicate your interest. 9. Do you plan to enlarge your present facility in the next few years? If so, will you be looking , for a new site in Tigard outside of Tigard, but in the area outside the area? Thank you for your assistance in completing this survey. Please return the 6 survey to William A. Monahan Director of Planning 6 Development ; City of Tigard, Oregon P.o. flex 23397 Tigard, OK `377; S e. (WAM:pm/0348P) POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT t March 1984 and First Quarter Recap r TO: City Administrator/City Council FROM: Chief of Police I. Personnel The department continues to be at full strength this month, and there has been no personnelturnover this quarter.` The average daily department strength this month was 18.5 as compared to 17.4 for March 1983. By division, ;the breakdown is as follows: Administration 2.0; Services Division 4.5; Patrol `Division 8.7; Traffic 1.3; and Investigation Division 1.9• II. Service Delivery The department responded to 768 non-criminal calls for service in contrast to 468 calls in March 1983. The combined total non-criminal calls for service the first quarter of 1984 was 1,`970; for this same time period in 1983 the total was 1,289. Patrol`Division's'obligated time this month was 1,999.4 hours, for the quarter it was 5,828.5 hours. Th= non-obligated time this month was 645.6 hours, for the quarter it was 1,726.5 hours. III. Crime There were 82 Part I crimes reported this month as compared to 103 for March 1983, down by 21 crimes in this classification, or 25.60/.. There were 30 Part I crimes cleared this month, or 36.10/6. The total Part I crimes reported this quarter was 229, in contrast to 311 for this same quarter last year, a decrease of 35.8%• The clearance rate for Part I crimes this quarter is 32.3%, or 74 cases. In contrast to the same time period of 1983, 32.51'. were cleared, or 101 cases. i There were 82 Part Il crimes reported this month, of that number 6-1 were cleared, or 74.4%. For the same month last year 56 were repprted, and 28 were cleared, or 50%. The total Part II crimes reported this quarter Was 232 in contrast to 235 reported the first quarter of 1983, a decrease of 3 cases," or 1.3%. There were 148 Part II cases cleared this quarter, or 63.8%, for this same `vime period in 1983, 94 cases were cleared, or 40%. The Investigative Division worked 51 active cases this months and cleared 15, or 29.4%. The total active cases worked this quarter by the Investigative Division was 94, of that number 33 were cleared, or 35.1%. The reported property loss this month was $25,580, of that amount $5,670 was recovered, or 22.2%. The combined total property loss this quarter was $99,454, of that total $29,134 was recovered, or 29.3%. _ . - _,- ��it•�i a.,-�,,_.a.mR,.�..� �:a�x�z�.am.?s^.�,resMY.. MM f IV. Traffic Patrol Division responded to 37 accidents, of that number 7 were injury. There b r were 461 citations issued this month as comapred to 313 in March 1983. There i were also 415 warnings issued this month in contrast to 26 for this same time f period in 1983. Patrol Division issued a total of 1,363 citations this quarter in contrast to k: 902 for this same quarter last year. ents reported this quarter, and 88 were There has been a total of 102 accid # reported for this same time period last year. There were 24, injury accidents reported this quarter, while 14 injuries were reported last year in the first quarter. The Enforcement Index this month was 41.85 as compared to 47.80 for March 1983. The;Enforcement Index for this is 37.83 in contrast this quto 49.64 for this same quarter in 1983. ' V. Police Reserves The Reserve Unit worked 204 hours 'this month assisting the department in policing the community, through this _ garter the Reserves have dontated 609 hours of communityservice (see att,,:=.'3 report for complete details). VI. ' 'Special Assignments r' A. K-9 Program (see attached report from Sgt. Martin) > Y B. Motorcycle Program (see attached report from Sgt. Newman) C. Alarms and Permit Recap (see attached report from Capt. Jennings) VII. Training n March 8 at the Police Academy. Lt. Wheeler, A. Firearms Instructors Mass o Sgts. Martin and Newman received 24 man hours of training. B. PUC Enforcement Class on March 28 at Oregon City. Officers Newman and t Featherston received 16 man hours of training. C. LEDS Regional Training Workshop on March 14 at Gresham Police -Department. Dispatchers DeVeny,-Crow and Cummins received 24 man hours of training. D. Advanced Investigators School March 9-13. Det. deBrauwere received 40 hours of training. VIII. Community Relations f A. Criminal Investipation Class - Crime Analysis Unit on 3-6-84 by Officer Grisham. 1 man hour spent: : : B. Drug Presentation on March 15 by Officer Grisham. 1 man hour spent, C. CE2 Seminar on March 27 by Officer Grisham. 1 man hour spent. D. Stranger Danger on March 29 by Officer Grisham. 1-man hour spent. ma wMMWL=MEF _...40 - ==mum 9 t r R' 1 f i 4 , NOTE: 147 citizens were contacted this month, with Officer Grisham } spending a total of 4 man hours doing community relations this month. Respectfully, R.B.<Adams Chief of, Police x I I . RBA:ac O� V-Sp Cpl S �?p041 T. �ispgTc� �/i►�/�Y GO a �FpO 'IO°VS /T/NG c,a cgDF�r �Q,�1/N/fir _ AOR O,cD ---teMeg _ w ; O D o F S , iVcS S(,Sp Usp t�gyicj� q�R's"sAu s . fST i✓�Cirlo Y Cykks COMMENTS ` 4 ° a - _ _ ft CITY OF TIGARD MEMORANDUM TO: Chief of Police April 18, 1984 FROM: Sgt. Martin SUBJECT: K-9 Report RE: March 1984 The K-9 Team responded to 14 calls during the month of March. of those 14 calls for service,'8 buildings were searched and cleared. 5 tracks were conducted and a K-9 was used to apprehend a suspect running from an officer. During the month the team spent 8 hours in training. 1 community talk was given to the Rotary Club about 40 members were in attendance. �a CITY OF' TIGARD MEMORANDUM S< TO: Chief of Police FROM: Sgt. Newman SUBJECT: Motorcycle Traffic Unit Report RE: March 1984 During the month of March 1984 there were 37 accidents, 7 injury, 30 non- injury. This is an increase over March 1983 which had 27 accidents, 5 injury„ 22 non-injury. - Of the 37 accidents this month, 16 were investigated by the Traffic Unit. Enforcement index this month is 41.$5 compared to 47.80 for the same period last year. Traffic Unit issued 168`'hazardous, 46 non-hazardous citations, for a total of 214. l ME ALARMS AND PERMIT RE-CAP Month of MARCH 1984 THIS SAME MONTH °(9 TOTAL TOTAL MONTH LAST YEAR CHANGE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR >CHANGE s TOTAL 'ALARMS...... .42 46 - 0810 11 134 12% a. False....... 40 45 1104 112 126 11% b. Bonafide... 2 1 --- 5 8 -- Permits Issued.... 7 8 19 20 + 5°� Permits Renewed... 4 --- 17 ---- Permit Fees....... $120 $115 $450 ----` ;. Permits Revoked..'. 2 2 6 ---- Revoked Fees..... $120 $100 $580 ---- MONTHLY SUMMARY STATEMENT: A noted decrease in false alarms is observed. ti 6-1 POLICE DEPARTMENT 'CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF March 19 84 DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL AVERAGE -- Y( --- --- NUMERICAL STRENGTH _D_AC_LY ABSENCE li AVERAGE El EECIIVE STRENGTH End of Same This- Same _I This Y� Last Same this: Month Month Mont.h i Month Month Month' Month Last Last Last Year Year it_ �, Year TOTAL PERSONNEL 29 28 10.5 10.6 18.5 17.3 17.4 ----- - CHIEF'S OFFICE 3 3 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 SERVICES :DIVIS,. 7 7 2,5 2.9 1 4.5 4.4 4.11 PATROL DIVISION 14 13 5.3 5.4 8.7 7.6 f 7.6 2 2 7 .6 i; 1.3 1.3 _ 1.4- TRAFFIC DIVIS. INVEST. SECTION 3 3 1.8 I 1..9 1.9 2.2 .FORCE ONE 14 '11 '5.2 3.2�j 8.8 � 8.0 7.8= S N F ,E TWO 8 9 L2.9 3.8 5.1 5.0 5.2 a FORCE THREE 7 8 2.4 3.6 4.6 4.3 4.4 -.-_.- ----- ^' E CHANGES IN PERSONNEL !� DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH 1. Present for duty end of last month _29 Thish Same Month 2. Recruited during month p _ -- ----- AfontLast Year w 3. Reinstated during month p 1. Total number. field • officers 16 15 Total to account for 2�_ t' 2. Less Agents Assi.g- 4. Separations from the service: ned to Investigat„ 0 0 t (a) Voluntary resignation 0 3. Average daily,abs- (h) Retirement p ences of field off- icers owing to: (c) Resigned with charges pending 0 (a) Vacation, cusp- p ensi.on, days off, F (d) Dropped during probation _ 5.7 ° 5.6 • comp, time, etc. o � . (e) Dismissed for cause 0 (b) Sick & Injur.ed .l .3 _ (f) Killed in line of duty 0 (c) Schools, etc. 2 .1 Total average daily (g) Deceased 0 t; absences 6.0 � b.-0 Total separations 0 4. Available for. duty _ 10.0 9.0 5 """resent for duty at end of month 29 _ ___-� - - TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT Monthly Report 3 I. Calls for Service: This Month 1,430 Year to Date 37796 t ' A. Obligated Time 1,999.4 B. Non-Obligated Time 645.6 t' II. PART I CRIMES No. Cleared Arrests A. Homicide B. Rape 1 C. Robbery D. Assault3 3 2 E E. Burglary 24 9 � F. Larceny 46 G. Auto Theft 6 1 H. Ar on TOTALS 82 30 21 III. PART 11 TOTALS 82 61 40 TOTAL Part I and II 164 91 61 i IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARGED: 61 a. Adult Male 33 c. Juvenile Male 21 b Adult Female 4 d. Juvenile Female 3 V. WARRANTS SERVED 8 VI. TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 25,580 TOTAL PROPERTY RECOVERED 5,670 VII. TRAFFIC a. Accidents Investigated 37 Injury Accidents 7 Fatal 0 ` b. Citations: VBR (Speeding) 65 Yield Right of Way__8_ Following too Close 4 Red Light 44 Stop Sign 75 Improper Turn 15 Reckless,Driving 1 Careless Driving `13 Driving.Under the Influence 9 Driving While Suspended 11 Other Hazardous 48 Non-Hazardous ]•68 Total Hazardous 293 c. Enforcement Index 41.85 d. Traffic Enforcement Totals Citations: This Month This Year 461 Year to Date 11363 This Month Last Years-Last Year to Date 902 Warnings: ThisMonthThis Year ' 415 Year to Date 1,152 ' This Month Last Year 26 Last Year to Date 114 NOTE fart I Crimes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate_ 6,�% Y••, Part II Grimes (Minor Crimes) Clearance Rate 74.4% TIGAT--:D POLICE DEPART.•.....�T First Quarter Report I. Calls for Service: 3,796 A. Obligated Time 5,828.5 B. Tion-Obligated T_me' 1,726.5 II. PART I CRIMES No, Cleared Arrests A. Homicide 1 1 1. B. Rape 3 1 1' C. Robbery 3 2 1 D. Assault 8 6 4 _ E. Burglary 71 22 16 F. Larceny 123 39 26 G. Auto Theft 15 3 2 H. Arson 5 PART I TOTALS: 229 74 51 III. PART II TOTALS % " 232 148 115 TOTAL Part I and II 461 222 166 IV. TOTAJ,;PERSONS CHARGED: 1.66 a. Adult Male 91 c. Juvenile dale 41 b. Adult Female 25 d. Juvenile Female 9 V. WARRANTS SERVED 32 VI. -TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 99,454 TOT.A PROPERTY RECOVERED $_29,134 VII. TRAFFIC a. Accidents Investigated 102 Injury Accident's 24 Fatal 0 b. Citations: 'VBR (Speeding) 329 Yield Right of Way 27 Followifig too Close 17 Red Lightl4l Stop Sigr: 127 Improper Turn 32 -Reckless ,Drivin,�. 1 Careless Driving 33 Driving Under the Influence 21 Driving While Suspended 43 Other Hazardo,s 137_ - Non-Pazardous 455 Total Hazardous 908 C. Enforcement Index 37.83 d. Traffic Enforcement 'Totals Citations: .1,363 Warninns• 1,152 NOTE- Part I Cr mes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate 32:37° "ar, 11 C:rimes '(?,roar Crimes) Clearance Yate 63.8°E, r1ZZ a CITY OF`TIGARD, OREGON _ a COUNCIL AGENDA ITEN SUMMARY AGENDA OF: AGENDA ITEM 4: DATE SUBMITTED: April 16 11984 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REQUESTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS REPORT FOR MARCH, 1984 DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: ' /�� CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATIONSUMMARY Attached please find.the monthly divisional report for Public Works Engineering and Operations. Also attached is a copy of a letter from a 72nd Avenue property owner that declined to sign the 'Agreement to Indemnify' . It is i-ncluded for your information and to update the list of indemnification signatures, summarized as follows: Owners Driveways 0 Yes 4 14 No 3 4 Unknown 2 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSXDERJED SUGGESTED ACTION Receive and file. TO: Frank A. Currie, Public :Works Director FROM: John S. Hagman, Engineering Division Supt`. SUBJECT: Departmental Monthly Report for March, 1984 I OFFICE A. Assigned Addresses For: 1. Park Street Square B. Subdivisions Sent to Council for Approval: 1. Bond ,park II Subdivision Compliance Agreement & Bond 2 L-Koll Business Park Subdivision for final acceptance.` 3`. Bonita Firs final acceptance. C. Drafting 1. Worked on drawing for Police case. .(Approx. 4 days) D. Work Program 6 1. Worked on 1984-85 work Program E. Maps 1. Worked on Bicycle Pathway Map. II ID?SPECTION A. Field i Crew Chief .has made 4 tours of inspection this month 2. Crew Chief has been working with Storer Cable. Hours Per Cent B. Subdivisions, Inspections 1. Sanitary Sewers -0- . 3 2. Storm Sewers 22 1 13.1 3. Sub-grade 4 2.4 3 1.8 4. Rock Base 3 1.8 5. Curbs 4 2.4 6. A.C. Pavement 7. Driveway Aprons and/or Sidewalks 20 11.9 8. Project Final 6 3.6 Other Inspections (I.E. Cable T.V., Etc.) 15.5 13 Contractor Technical Assistance 13 1.2 .7 P.W. Shops Technical Assistance 2 1 RoutineFieldInspections (R.F.A.'s Etc.) 5 -3.0 Field Studies for Street Improvement Design 15 8 9 Street Design Computation 12 7.1 Street Design Drafting 6 3.6 Routine Drafting 4 2.4 Mapwork and Research 7 4.2 Plans Checking, Bid Packet Proofreading & Corr. 10 6.0 t Photo and Written Documentation 6 3.6 TOTAL 169 100% SUBJECT: FIELD SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH, 1984 I. EXISTING STREET RE-CONDITIONING PROGRAM A. Continued assistance in the design `& computations of S.W. O'Mara ' 1 Street Project.. Grade sheets are also being prepared for construc- tion staking. B. No progress bn the final drafting and costing of the Franklin Street_ improvement Project. II COLLECTOR STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTATION PROGRAM - This program's priorities, in terms of projects, has changed to better facilitate current and future landdevelopment in Tigard. Work on the Greenburg Road project has stopped indefinitely due to the need, of a more concentrated effort_ to the Control Network Program. However, work accomplished on 'this project Is not lost_ and continued work will resume when possible. S.W. ,72nd Avenue (from Hwy 217 to Pacific- Hwy) has been assessed as a high priority due to recent developments in the Tigard Triangle. Work on this project- will commence shortly with completion sometime before the end of this fiscal year. III CONTROL NETWORK PROGRAM A better part of this month has been spent within this program. Along € with general mapping and computation maintenance, additional field con trot points are being established to accommodate the current: surge in land development. IV L.I.D.'S I. Activity on L.I.D. 's has been limited to preparation of the necessary grade sheets for construction staking. V OTHER A. General Information Mapping Upgrade. and Update_ Update Status: 1. 200 scale Land base maps 2. 200 scale address maps Upgrade Status: 1. No progress on Annexation & Road Jurisdiction Maps 2. 75% completion of 400 scale City Map. B. Routine Section Tasks Noted 1. An average of 8 public inqueries a day (6 via t:elrphone and 2 counter) were handled by this section over the past. month. t lark,P s .. . own 12 CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS ` March 1984 Report DATE: 4/5/84 OPERATIONS OFFICE:' PARKS: 2. 1 .4 GREEN THUMB LABOR 1 . 108`.5 hrs mowing 29 .0 hrs mowing 2. 18.5 hrs irrigation 18 .5 hrs irrigation 3 . 78.`0 hrs restroom maintenance 4. 32:5 hrs ballfield maint . 6.0 hrs �landsllf capield maint . 5 .: 86.0 hrs landscaping 16 .5 hrs landscaping 6. 11.5 hrs trails maintenance 7 1.0 hrconstruction 1 .0 hr construction .4 STREETS: 1 . 86 hrs street cleaning 2.0 hrs street cleaning 2. 157 hrs patching 3. 15 .0 hrs painting & street mark.3 .0 hrs painting & street mask. 4. 72 .5 hrs sign maintenance 5 . 8.0 hrs brushing & limbing 6. 37.0 hrs grading &-rocking 7-. 8.0 hrs bridge maintenance WASTE WATER: 1. 43 .0 hrs T.V. inspection 1 , 112 ft line 2 . 52 .0 hrs Sanitary Sewer Clean - 3,362 ft line 3. 3 .O hrs Smoke Test 4. 19.0 hrs Manhole Repairs 5 . 1 .0 hr Flooding 6. 2 .0 hrs Ditching 7 . 191 .5 hrs Storm Drain Repairs SUPPORT SERVICES: is 14 .8 hrs P.M. on Equipment 2. 133 .2 hrs Scheduled Repairs 3. 1 . 5 hrs Unscheduled Repairs 4 . 104 .0 hrs Fabrication 5 . 39 .3 hrs Building Maintenance 6. 115 .8 hrs General Support ® M zi _ H } UU 9 F } wevVeERG STORE: TIGARD STORE: 308 Highway 99W 16045 S.W.Upper`Boones Ferry Pd. Newberg Oregon 97132 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone 538-7342 Phone 639 2838 j f March1.2, ;1984 Attn: Mr. Frank Cuvy y city of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR. 97223 Dear Mr. Guvy, At this time, no, we do not agree ;to sign the Agreement to Indemify regarding the 72nd Street Project of our driveway entrance to our business'. _ If any questions arise, please feel free to give me a call. sincerely, Michael Hs Watt MM,Al:rW °I CITY OFrTIGARD" OREGON �m COUNCIL AGENDA 'ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: April 17, 1984 PREVIOUS;ACTION: Appointment of ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:- Ratify Board & Board & Committee Members - 4/9%84 Committee Apk2Lntijents REQUESTED BY: Council DEPARTMENT HEAD OR:' CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Council appointed members to the Park Board and Economic Development ,Committee at the -last regular meeting (April 9, 1984). The attached' resolutions are to ratify those appointments. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Approve resolutions.` I i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: ' Ll DATE SUBMITTED: April 19, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA.TITLE: Approve Civic CenterAdvisory Committee Scope & REQUESTED. BY: Council on 4/9/84 Focus ' t DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: cg t INFORMATION SUMMARY At the Council meeting of 4-9-84, staff was 'requested to prepare a resolution creating the Civic Center Advisory Committee setting' out the scope and focus of the work to be accomplished by ±them.` Attached 'are two resolutions: (1) would appoint a 5 member committee or (2) 'would appoint a seven member committee. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERER 1. Pass resolution to appoint 5 members 2. Pass resolution to appoint 7 members 3. Don't create committee I SUGGESTED ACTION Staff would recommend passing one of the two resolutions to appoint the advisory committee. /L169,4 CITY OF TIGARD,'OREGON (( 5 ME SRS RESOLUTION NO. 84-D:2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'TIGARD, EGON, ESTABLISHING A CIVIC CENTER PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WHEREAS: The Civic Center program to datha been successful in large part due to the extensive effort and,!in�� vement of the community; and 1 WHEREAS: The Council recognises the, de ifor effective professional project management by staff yet at' tl same time Council desires to continue the active citizen 'involvement in the project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tiger d City Council that: 1. The Civic Center Project Advisory Cgim-nittee is hereby established; r 2. The Committee shall advise Counc '1 as to Architect selection and project design, and shall advise stafF and report monthly ,to Council as to construction progress; ,l I 3.' The >Committee term shall be tYirough June 30, 1985 or project close-out by Council; 4. The Committee shall be comprised of five (5) members of which two (2) shall be technical or professional persons experienced with such projects and three (3) shall be citizens at large; 5. The Committee shall be asked to immediately meet with staff and recommend a preliminary project work program and budget to Council, and, without further delay, ahall immediately begin to ask for Request For Qualifications e om architects interested in being considered as the designarchite ; and, 6. The Mayor p o tem, subject to Council approval, is authorized to appoint the Commit ee members based upon received Interest Applications at City Hall; alternatively failing unanimous Council consent as of April 27, 1984, a Special Council meeting is called for April 30, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. at Tigard City Hall. PASSED: This day of , 1984. Mayor pro tem City of Tigard ATTEST: Deputy City Recorder City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 84- 1462A AMR 90 _ - MONINN - - — CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: q-' n AGENDA ITEM h: Consent ) 3 , 5 DATE SUBMITTED: 4/18/84 PREVIOUS; ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE. BONITA ROAD REPORT REQUESTED BY: Public Works DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR:` INFORMATION SUMMARY The owner of the critical property required for the repair of the Bonita'Road slide has agreed to sign the easement on Saturday, April 21 1984. If so, we will present the signed easement form for Council acceptance along with the three quotations to prepare the area for the drainage and fill work. -a=sxa=acaaaaa==aaa=aaaa=aaaansa=xa=a.n --- -a--=a=a=-ca ---a.--.- ==aaa -aaa=a=a ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERJED +zaaaasa=a aa�:cvaa=aaaasaaaasazaaaa=a=-ac=ca ----•.•--..--....---..._. --.-�-.--... SUGGESTED ACTION Recormitendation of Public Works Director is contingent upon the signed easement form. w g s. ' AJ- 6�/V5r, 'Brosseau' PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT 2S1 12BB TL4100 Bonita Road - • J KNOW ALL 'MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT 4lALLACE J BROccFAU '°f�'' Here Ma ter ca , ed t e rantors, �n cons eration o e sum c o ars an other _ ood ano valuable consideration by the city of Tigard,_hereinafter called Grantee,- have granted and conveyed and by these presents do grant and convey unto the City -.,° Tigard, a perpetual easement for :the construction, maintenance and repair, with _essary access thereto,of a .slope, cut or fill, occasioned by the construction, roperatinn and maintenance of `a public,road and appurtenances within the following described parcel of land, situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State ')f Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title _ t. or interest to;the surface of the soil, nor any other rights except those expressly stated in this easement, nor prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover, provided, however, that such use shall not be permitted to damage or destroy lateral support to the highway, and provided further that nothing.herein_contained shall grant to the City of Tigard the right to excavate beneath existing buildings or deposit fill materials against existing buildings above the top of the foundations r thereof, but it is understood and ,agreed the City of Tigard shall never be required ± to remove the dirt or other materials placed by it upon said property, nor shall said City be subject to any damages to the Grantors, their heirs and assigns, by reason thereof, or by reason of the slopes constructed thereon,or by reason of change of grade at the street or highway abutting on said property. IN CONSIDERATION of the ppremises, Grantee agrees to provide topsoil on the con- structed slope, to hydroseed the slope with natural grasses and to plant deciduous ! trees on the'slope and that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said road to be vacated, the rights of the Grantee in the above-describedease- ment will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of any such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the gr,�ntor(s) I}as !avel hereunto set his (her) } hand(s) and seal(s) this ��yday of !/ r (SEAL) (SEAL) e+' (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) L ) ( , BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this day of 19 * before me the undersigned Notary PubT —isi ami for e t to of regon personal appeared the within-named who is are nown to me to be- the s entica in ivi ua escri a in an who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to t at he (she) (they) executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TES IMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this At day of 19 0t. youtic or regon My Commission expires: � Approved as to form this a,3 � � day of L , 19 By:;qty ttorney - ity o igard Approved as to legal description this &qdQf , 19 eay_ - � Approved this __ day of 19` CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON By: y=� now "Brosseau" 2S1 12BB TL4100 } Bonita "Road EXHIBIT "A" A;portion of Lot 5 '"WILSON ACRES", a recorded plat, being located in the N.W. a 'o£ Section 12, T. 2S., R. 1 W , W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northerly line of S.W. Bonita Road (County Road 736, 40 feet wide) , with the east line of that tract conveyed to Donald F. Wiek, Grace F. Wiek and Kingston Wiek by document No. 79-026265,` Washington County deed records, said point being N 01" 20' 25" E 2.23 feet from the south line of said Lot 5 "WILSON ACRES"; thence on said east line N 01' :20' 25" E 44.77 feet' thence N 58° 49' 40" E 22.59 feet; thence S' 71' 32' 12 E 34.00 feet; thence N 87° 26' 00" E 67.00 feet; thence S 22' 20' 50" E 50.25 feet; thence N 86° 15' 24" E 44.70 feet• to the northerly line of. S.W. Bonita Road (C.R. 736) ; thence on said northerly line S 73' 19' 48" W 36.57 feet to' the- south line of said Lot 5, "WILSON ACRES" thence on said south line N 88° 47' `47" W 141.16 feet to the northerly line of said Bonita Road; thence on said northerly line N 71° 32' 12" ,W 7.53 feet:' to the point;of beginning. Containing 7016 square feet, more or less. ` j NORTH LINE LOT 5 WILSON ACRES - ._ SOC°13 'a3 1 %TC 1C I !73 UA - - 2V b,r i :y1,311 7L 4, wf 1 10 W E c. CD 14-00 w Y w ® ^ t 1 z l 1 1 e a O.D.O.T. PERM. , 20 a SLOPE EASEMENT 410/480 DESCRIBED ( , � SOUTH LINE LOT 5 9► r/ AREA 1t "WILSON ACRES" 0as a;oo'Ve N57126'oa•e y s9 oo 44.70 fi 1 - _ ------ � •'� — 149.04 - - - e s �� - TSTA.14�586fi- .^ 207 45 1 14IIV GI lot-IT-_ CJI.I '~ _ /6 __� _ a9 06'24JE: QO.gS 65.69 9.94 80.01 jj 4Z 1^60.. -•-� �� "% p p(� �/ �.... q 0 ®6.T1 �`9 i9. BOND — S. . ° B 0 N M _ E^ %'8\N �- o 17•E i N't'!••5�66 W. _ _ N ITT 99 IIWW z eT It 11 106 0 _ P / _.99.09-� STA 1:_S HC I II 4.80 l ?0..10 fib T6 1 1 -5 13•IL 90 STA.11-81.27 i � ' m r . w CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF Ancil 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: Consent DATE SUBMITTED: April l7, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Approve Procedure On Delivery Of Council REQUESTED BY: Police P.B.O. Packets DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY The Police P.B.O. (Productivity By Objective) Committee has identified the delivery of Council packets as a costly and inefficient use of a sworn police officer'stime, especially under increasing workloads and cut-backs. P.B.O. teaches problem identification, evaluation and alternative suggestions. The Police P.B.O. ' team' identified over 32 manhours/year related to Council packets. At about $13.50/hour (salary and benefits) that's about $500/year. Several less costly options were evaluated.` ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Private courier service 2. Clerical employe on overtime 3. Councilors pick up at station 4. Councilors pick up at Police station Thursday night after 6 P.M. or delivery by part-time clerical employee during work day on Friday SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends approval of alternative #4. Councilors pick up at Police station Thursday night after 6 P.M. or delivery by part-time clerical employee during work day on Friday. , i } H r. TEMENT PRUbLEM. b A sm i CITY COUNCIL MUST HAVE PACKETS AS .SOON A P IBL.E AFTER THEY ARE. .. AILA LE WITH y � ADEQUATE TIME FOR COUNCIL REVIS - I� PRODUCTIVITY BY OBJECTIVES Our basic reason for gathering together is to solve problems and increase productivity. Our first step was to choose' a problem that us could resolve by using resorces that were available to us. We agreed ... ...on a..single, problem that we could work on, and that was the City Council -,packets that the police Dept. is ordered to deliver each week. The . "_`problem statement is simply that the City Council moat have ;the, packbts —as as as possible after they are available with adequate time for :�reill.ew. . .. How did we arrive at this problem? All members of the team sat down and had.--a--brainstorming -session. This is simply a technique that encourages the sharing of thoughts and ideas from all the team members. }Its purpose is to stimulate and generate new ideas by combining one's --creativity with that of all 'the members of the team. It also creates %;an enviromsnt where members of the team feel free to make suggestions :and take some risks. Thru this brainstorming we were able to compile a listeof many ideas or problems that we could pick from. The next step was to classify these problems into three groups. Lie did this by assigning each problem a letter, A, B, or C. Those classified 'as "All problems were those that could be solved immediatly with little work ori-' aur part. Those classified with the letter 11811 were reasonable woblems that we could solve with a moderate amount of time and effort. Those we classified with "C" were problems that were out of our control c andcouldn' t solve due to them requiring budget exp9n6itures. From these categories we decided to to take a problem From group "B" those being the problems that we could solue with a little time and effort. EMM Why did we think this was a problem 7 There were two basic reasons we felt this was a problem. °These°:gas a moral factor with the officers involved. 2. That this proceedure was: not cost effective. These items will be covered by our next speaker. r mF z 1 01 Co [ c O C31, r-1 �( N rl Cn W Ln M .t �O Ori >1 .a N r co U v x m o. s, �. p. b 2 40. E N O H 0. W _Sd U N V1 r-r O N > 4 4-3 .14 A.- c v c• O o b N u U a L 0 o 3 � 3 C a, ca 0 � c •rj w 4-1 o °Noca _ L H > .ca C- co 0 >1 0U E v 4.3o O r-4 L U A. b 'o b ca •rl U co W N v) N 4.) O a ca cc Qui 4.3 x U U U mo•i 9. V 0 L o o + a, U U 4.) 0 4-3 r v 0 M O L b o N 43 Ucl. W arc .14 art Rf W Qi >• i� E x n c• E E � v v v m n a sem. E .14 V 0h0 bo ba bo ca ca N 1� A 4. C .ri Q) Q? N 9J (if O J-) Q) 9) 0 E E 4-3 U v o (L) >, a > n°' c) cr'i o 0 >. x cu cnx x x x ajo b r1 N M J to E— - - III IM E9.1 O o o CZ) k i o l� Ig W c t' U NO ho r1 O 1 :W .O .. -Cf) rL- •r1 C -•O `�, H ¢ � z -O v o]co N 5. pr P. O p N CL O cn >'to ca r-1O F' SN, A ri C O Z w N O ¢. 3 a > cB caD C� U .O •if b S. O � W N rn � ca O 43to ca P Q• cq co •r1 O c• x -+ ° coca ^ a �+ w „ ,, N N N N n � a •-1 C N w Q a a O r ::3 to O O N ri O N Ori O N O N b •� N .O CO > t� U t31 0 T. C O Oi N i A N t0 >~ > >10 Ell 10 0 0 O [] ro —1 N U N to 69 .-i r4 rn N > L.. U ca W N p CU4.3 rU N N x a x •+3 x w x as Ulo H cr) aa)) c -H o o v U) r-i 4J (1) w C u . ro (a :4.3 a o u cu o a) s N ro 'ro L C ri C (a 0. O 1-3 1 0 U):E '^ a). O H U) :ca a -'o U a) N 4-3 a) U) > U a) U) -4 by ca -V . . C: V by :.U) :� .,i 4-3 2 ....E y..) a ':4�3 9~ a : U E +-3:••-i a) :�' 4) a) O U a 'O b0 Sr by Q" U Z V) Cl).5: U a ri U X �C 'a C ba S: H r-1 fa :O 0. ri a a O :.U) W r-1 to a r-1 . U1 - L :ri 0. "..S-- C > c� Cl. (1) a ./ to (a a U'% L w (Dro ? Cl c.. 1 (3) a) > E u rn v) o -4 v q O •ri a L U U) U)'r-I H 0. •ri O 'G b0 U) L +3 a a) u E ca > -1, U ca 1 a N O •rl a) > by W w a -f o ru (Ti E m a4 U .0 > •r, to L v ri 4.1 r U E U) H O co .a) N U1 O C •.-i a) U) () ri a) a) - >~ a a 1 by a L L u 4.3 .a :1 cc V a) ,L E a) a � b0 C a) •ri v U O E •14 C (D 'a U a cc A 4-3 >, > U 4'x U 4.. O > O O o : 1- co ca C CY1 L -.-I •ri U) U O U) :4. :"1 a L V] :r-1 .D a >-e ca 4... ca m H U) 4 O O •--I O U fn W Qt a) 4.3 N 4-.. r q a U) (D r- a) a +3 .,..c U) >•, i 3 a) a O a A a) .x O a a) U f>•1 a •u a) L :bD W H 0 - 4-. •r. a) O •r1 - ,,.] O a) E :U O r-1 C C E : C ro L •14 - C S. L U) C > a W m .o o o) a-� o .� .r+ a a = O ca L ra ba .� • : x :.0 v) L S; Q : 441 L E ro A C r-I a Q U U) L i-) U) C H U) b0 ca O (1) W C E L,4J U) :ca C L:cri U) : L C L O :.a) a) .0 L a to p rl a)c ro u O a) .--I o •rl +.) '0 -u no U (1) (1) U >` L U > a-. > C U) C C C a) > O •rl>a-) O >a ..-1 A :..-I C -H C ro (a ca E -A U) : O W (Z ri O 4.3 i.) r-I ^. ri' r-1 ro C O :C .0 C r-1 r-1 : ...4) > ca '.ri •rl ri a) a a) r-I •rl a) •11 O a) Q ca v a- u ca ro a a) a s E i. as c) C). 4-3 o c ;, E E E .7 a " C � 4.) O N V) U) i • O H Q () -1 a) O a M V) 7 4J •ri a) C C 4-� .>v H 4-3 ri (Tj .X +-) a) a) U) •♦ Q 0. 2 a s E E U ri 0 E C q O. a);ca a).+) : N 0 O a ra a) O •.+. 7 A 3 -E 4-3 A ca (21 : L C :.b0 a L a L 0 r-I 14 4. ca C ca ro a O v a) o d O o ca (3) (1) (21 a) u -H 4 1, u ro .N Q a) u o w a-. ro a n Q) u ro a .-1 a A •ri 4-30 --j O a •H aq-4by L Ts a >, Q E, V H •u C C a) -4 r-1 as U •r1 a U C .-I (1) +- [ •r7 O C ••i of a) a O O H O O •V ro 0 O (1) ca O C •rl a a O Cl '7 u) V) a C Q a4�3 V) U) CA R1 U C a O U w 04 X X x X X x X X X X X Y. X X X X X X X X X X X X O cz A W 2 x X x x X X X H N V) Q, U) [r w U] X X : X '-I W W W E ?Wc X X X >+ 7 >c >-I O X X X > X X X X1 -,� w z x X x x X x x x O wW x x X X x C N H W U) O X y � a) A W H •rl W W y V r-1 ix oc) a%. W A A O 4.3 a 2 rl > H U H Q U S.O.. 2 N >) Sro. .-�-I a) R-. a E. 0 6ro > ro (11a) O o U) r1 C AW E• b0 z >> V G a.) C C •rl C L C .fl m •.i N Vl L] !1. C w O L C L -3 ro ro L L ro L to > .-, w 4.3 •rl O a U ro ro ro (1) O a) ro 3 (1 O L O U) w A a) C q Z Cq 3 A a > V) a7 Q W C) b0 C H H W a ro 6, w a .a m a W > o >I o H U� O U H O a C7 O O U4 >+ a: H m d -1 ZDH Q q m L] H H > W [z. O E 'd7' Q EO WW A. U Q LK [il 0 O O O 0- ^ r p W olit N UI:N W M It .0 N.� ON b x x a ro cES N (U O In_ ri) En oz 0 0 0 m v u w 0 • (h co Q` it It it IP II S En H H W _ H x o W H U c7 x W Q A U •u a. In a Q C5 O .It L5 WI H a .. r4 H i. za � W W N H H z H W H H H U •:1 ^ W W P H H W x Q ri O > z W > UO P. 0 4-3 HO > z W O a < H H Q :D .. 0.. ED H .X W H a CO A A HN :14ca A � A -.9 � � W U W H W z E'' a+ O �• a Iwo >H d0 P+ ldl WW W Cl) H H W va a > w •• ..3 'O a s c EL w W 1-i m A W N W A En W A a w A -0 w w H w H (n A a W H > H N H — x H H a z •A z C9 H In H [z. W H C H W 0 W t C H O u z H a P. W > cz. O U w H W cn Go CO •,4 O •.I Cs H G R. H Cl N 0 1. O z P+ co z W 4.3 W H a. � H H 0 i v1 z E-1 O [/} w W W H U H E H 0 O p d H E- W w G <c a� W H H I1. t7 Oti C7 •r-1 C � CS E+ • I c� a 01% tx In Q H O co w W s d 0 <n W O = ¢ > -I > rn W z O > 6 t 1 H U y : •� _ n-ot-i m Ad O N•,1 N � � m°' _ � > a) � � cm a —4 U A 0 � m �b a) -I .? � -N 10 0 m C: z x. C: > > .� c6 O 3 a) 0 w E •.i .-1 � 6 a) cn E SG E U U A H ice. a) •>� i. Cd Q a o v m acs � ro � o aa� ayv) u O Oi 4j r_ U) a) -0 " U as 4. 40....E Z a) 1 O Q) S� Om0 > o W H mro a � -� . V) w y my �. H U N A p ...7 r7 .Y a) 8 �0+ N0 aa) uo) - �+ s. o. a a � woo vaUiv0a .� m U 3 U V) W a 0 C; 0 0 4-3 x •rq ro O (D Q) 4 4-) (DU a)bo O S. N ro bID 4.3 E (a a) a)0.l(D 0 -C a >, m :3CL x L.. A U N 3 N W U N C7 a) C C C .ai ami 43 6 0 14 X: to { U C3 Q U .rt-i •i •4 c!i 4.) � Ua. m ►ja. a y � � � � Y > 0 a) 0 C w 3 m A.V ro �. - as ---------- -- - DOLLAR — COST _ 32F 32 M a 30 28 26` 24 22 20 m 18 16 - 14 I i 12 10 - I � I 8 4 6 I : t 4 z 5 r- 2 S STATUS PRIVATE OFFICE AIDE COUNCIL QUO COURIER PICK—UP i rY CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ( COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY p F AGENDA OF: A ri1 23, 1:984 AGENDA ITEM #: PREVIOUS ACTION: DATE SUBAfITTED: Aril 19, 1984 none by'council ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Award posal REQUESTED BY: Retirement Study Consultant Pro 4 J. 'Widner CITY ADMINISTRATOR: DEPARTMENT 'HEAD OK: JLW INFORMATION SUMMARY g the Cityis to Pursuant to contract negotiations with TPOA and T1�iEA/OPEU, contract with a' consultant to review the City retirement plans and make recommendations. The request for, proposal required consultants to submit their bids by Apr' z 18, 1984. The project is o begin in May and end in December with a formal report to City Council. } with a Review Committee made up of the The consultant will be workingtwo ; following members: two "frand Tthej Assostant Ffrom inance Director representatives inher } ( from management employees Personnel Director capacity. A copy of the request for proposal and copies of the received bids are attached. The City received bids from the following companies: Milliman & Robertson, Inc. William M. Mercer, Inc. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Reject all bids. 2. Recommend the acceptance of the bid from SUGGESTED ACTION t n & Robertson, Inc. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the proposal from Millima and direct staff to proceed with the project. g E { The CITY OF TIGARD invites your proposal foi consulting work with; a review committee to study the options and issues of various retirement plan alternatives pursuant to City policies and State Statutes. QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Must be an independent financial consultant. 2. Must .have demonstrable experience in retirement plan consulting with public agencies. 3. Must supply references. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. The project will begin May, 1, 1984 and be completed by December 31 1984. Your firm will consult with a "review committee composed of . City employees. The initial meeting will be for organizational purposes to determine the best approach in gathering employee retirement preferences. 2. _ Assist in determining the retirement needs of the City employees, via questionnaires, interviews, etc. 3. Analyze current retirement programs of the City. 4. Explore other'available retirement programs. 5. Present and review recommendations with the review committee. 6. Design a conversion plan, that provides no loss of benefit for any employee. 7. Prepare a written report for Council submittal by December 31, 1984. ASSISTANCE: The City will provide clerical support for questionnaire°s, reports and other production typing. ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 S. W. Burnham, POB 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223 by 4.30 pm April 18, 1984. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. The proposals are not to exceed $20,000.00 Any .questions, contact Jerri Widner, Finance Director 639-4171 ext. 40. i r _ _ AM-1- ABE MILLIMANT & ROBERTSON, ixcC COA'SUI-TINO ACTUARIES .101 S.W.MAIN-SUITE 025 I PORTLAND,OREGON 07204 '« ALLAN p:AF ('iANE 1. FSA v1D V.AKEwLFu .503/227-0634 LARRY D.B EFLF SA' JAMESR:BEROUIST,F,CAS GEORGE L BERRY,r.SA ,•• :.DAVID N.BICKLRSYArF tCAS JAwET r,BLEAKNC .SA ,iMOMA3 R..LEAKNEx.EX F.SA April 17, 1984 WILLIAMF ". RSBlm FS A VCTCRJ. OOYFAS A STEpHCp D.BPIN9L r.SSA ROBewTG UMFBELLrSA . ROBERT M.CHANDLER.F.SA MILTp11 F.GHAUN F.FSA MARN A CNESNCR,F.SJl B SERYH.0 LLEYT.,FSA ROBCR C OKSON.FS A , ,pHN I COOKSON.FSA -JRMG4A CUP415.F.SA iHpA.e,S KCUST15,F.SA 'Ms. Jerri L. Widner GARY S.A.0A1F.l'S oREw S.DAYIT nCF E Finance Director CMRL LIS&J.DUROG"ERS,r 5A INYLLIS A..00PAN,F SA City of Tigard NOGG N:3RLYC0.F SA ROBERT J.DUA (.F. 12755 S. W. Ash ROBCPT J.OTrtOWBKL F SA _p JOHN 5.CCKLRT.F S.A. JOLINS.EDWMDSFCA P. 0. Box23397 CARP OLJ.7l i FSTA F .G A5 O"NC.rOLEY.FSA- =Tigard, Oregon 97223 AD.FFSA JECSAwscFA pCNw15J.G 'FA Dear Jerri •. .IATRICK J.GRANNAN,FCAS. T[NNISLGRAVES F.SA � � ' C-LE W.HMII FCA5. GMARLES W.1a0-l..FSA DALLSmA ,OM Re: Actuarial Consulting Services WILLIA:IAMAI,WRSOw.F SA RONALD G HARRIS,F SA SACK M EEMMLF.SA. J:ALAN HERRINGcmr.SA 9 SA OOLIGLAS C MOLTEN.F. Milliman & .Robertson Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to SILVtO1NGUI,FSA ' FENTON R.M-CSON.FSA .provide actuarial: services to the City :for a review: of the re- . "O lD M,ITO.F C.A GREGORYO.JACOBS F,SA ti rement plan• MARKO.JOHNSON.F.SA -.CNE M.KALWARSKL F,SA JGUS F KLA CwF.G5.� GERALD T.KOGER,FGA SCOPE OF WORK DAVID W.KRUEGER.F.SA TIMOT"TO.LCE.FSA JOENM, RJ.L0.NSrAF..SA The .project will begin May 1, 1984 and be completed by Decem- ber 31, 1984 at the latest. We will consult with a review MI,RKLUTOW,F.SA O.ALAN LIT6S.F.SA M CEAELJ.MAHONEY FSA committee to decide on the best approach to the project. We BRIAN J.-"SON,F SA RNIEL G.MAULLFSA .will develop and analyze any employee questionnaires that the DANIELJ. "CGRATHFSA MICHAELAMMURR,AC committee determines are appropriate. MICEAELAM':N 5 rS,FCAS 5 EV J. KLS FSA STEVEN J.M IKKALO.F.SSA L .IEL R MOHOPIE,SA Our analysis will include the current retirement programs. of the OANICL P.NIC.F 5-A °AVID F.OGDEN.FSA Citi/ and .various other.alternatives. We will meet with the com- ERLKE T.DOG.V SA J ROBCRT W.OMTAL F SA. RICHARD L 05TU .FSA mittee as necessary, present a final written report to the City GREGORY W,PARKE R.F SA. I J. 1. J. Council and meet with the City Council if requested. J.11NN IEA90T�F SA MARGAR£Y L IGRSON,F SA KRISC.IETLRSOw.FSA RC,Q RT L CA.FOWSKI.FSA QUALIFICATION OF MILLIMAN & ROBERTSON, INC. ROBCRT A ITOR,F.SJL STAN E ARHOLLF,CA BIANLCYA ROBLRT5.T.5.A W1 TC AROBCRTS.FSF Milliman & Robertson, Inc. , founded in 1947, is-a nationwide firm J0-P.S MAEONED.F SA JOENI SCHRCINER,FS.A V^U SEDLACEAFSA. of independent actuaries. It is totally owned by its forty-one COHALD J.SEBAL F SA T. o6;«ESNT`sAA principals and thirty-one associate members, all of whom are Fellows of the Society of Actuaries or the Casualty Actuarial STEVE,S.5044" ".SA - STCVCNL51-LER.FSA Society. Milliman & Robertson services its clients strictly on —.Ek r.5- KARCN I.STEFFEN,F,SA DENISJ.SVLJ.wAm.BA. a fee for services basis. DO VGLIS G.TAYLOR.r.BA W'LLIAM S,1HCMAS.F SA GCA ALDMTOC F,SA MAq-1R1ES.F SA. .31ANLCY&TVUK F SA JAMCS R.T'LCR.F SSA BRUCE V,VANDER ELS.F SA. +•.OREW B.WANG F SA 'ALD R.WEGNCR.FSA -ROC WHITLFSA _ HARD WINKENN CROCK.F.S BRJCEW WINTERHOF,FS.A 3M1 E L.WORKMAN.F CA. M''CNDCLLMILLIMAN,r.SAl10)41 JAMES H.RIW5.F 5.A 11B]B I ALAANY ATLANTA CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER HARTFORD.- HOUSTON - INDIANAPOLIS - LOSANGELES MILWAUKERRP IJ'LN#APOL15 NEW YORK .OMAHA PHILADELPHIA PHOENIX PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE WASHINGTON,O.C. ASSOCIA'ED IN CANADA W11H ECKLER. BROWN, SCGAL 6 CO.- LTD. Ms. Jerri L. Widner April 17, 1984 Page 2 i i Milliman & Robertson, Inca has built a national reputation of integrity ! and work of the highest professional standards. As an indication of the ° firm's emphasis on preserving high quality control procedures in the ? pension area: 1. All work is done by or under the supervision of principals who must a ' be Fellows of the Society of Actuaries. G s ; 2. Milliman & Robertson, Inc. actuaries work within guidelines estab- lished by the firm covering such items as: t ` a. Selection of actuarial assumptions and cost methods; b. Reliance on data prepared by others; k C. Standards of actuarial reporting. 3. Milliman & Robertson, Inc. actuaries adhere to the principals of professional actuarial organizations, including: a. The Guides to Professional Conduct and Opinions of the Ameri- can Academy of Actuaries; ' b. The Recommendations of the Committee on Actuarial Principles and Practices in Connection with Pension Plans American Academy of Actuaries. ,' 4. A plan of peer review has been established lander which the work of each Milliman & Robertson actuary is periodically reviewed by another Milliman & Robertson actuary. 5. The Milliman & Robertson, Inc. Pension Steering Committee monitors the practices and procedures of the Milliman & Robertson, Inc. actuaries in relation to the guidelines described above. 6. Trice each year, the firm conducts study sessions for its pension (' actuaries in order to remain current on matters relating to pension plans. 7. Principals of the firm regularly attend national conferences of various professional and pension-related organizations, and serve _ on professional committees affecting public pension policy. . PRPSL K2 Mll.L9R9R.N r. ROBERTSON, INC.- C.ONSULTIN43 ACTUARIES 3�` a Mis. Jerri L. Widner April 17, 1984 Page 3 ;Approximately 300 'persons are employed by Milliman & Robertson, Inc. - Among these are over 130 Fellows, Associates and members of various actuarial societies. The entire resources of the firm are available for discussion of issues and problems which any of its clients might face`. This breadth of experience is often used in dealing with specific prob- lems, 'where'a person in the firm not routinely working With the client might have special expertise of particular value to the client." PUBLIC AGENCY EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES Milliman & Robertson, Inc. is one of the nation's leading consultants to public employee retirement systems, serving approximately 150 public ' retirement systems covering three-quarters of a million. participants. From the Portlandoffice, I personally supervise the ongoing actuarial work for the Oregon Public Employes Retirement System, fourteen Oregon `cities and counties, and over a dozen other public;agencies in Oregon. Please feel free to contact the following individuals: Mr. Kenneth A. Maul , Deputy Director _ Oregon Public Employes Retirement System P. 0. Box 73 Portland, Oregon 97207 (229-5824) Mr. Darrell Dearborn, Personnel Director City of Salem 555 Liberty S. E. , Room 225 Salem, Oregon 97301 (588-6162) Other references are available upon request. ESTIMATED FEE Before presenting our estimated charges, we would like to explain our fee procedures so that our fee proposal will be understood more clearly. Most of the work that we do for our clients is done on a straight hourly fee-for-service basis. Each employee of the firm is assigned an hourly rate which is used in determining the fee. This rate is subject to change from time to time, and is generally changed at least once per year as salaries are changed due to inflation and professional advance- ment. We also bill our clients for expenses that we incur on their behalf, such as for computer charges, printing expenses, travel and lcng distance telephone charges. PRPSL K3 MILLIMAN & ROBERTSON, INC. -CONSULTINC3 ACTUARIES WON. LOW 1 Ms. Jerri L. Widner'' - i April 17 1984 Page 4 For most of our public clients, on the other hand, we operate on 'a fixed fee basis, such as that ,proposed for the purposes of the contract with the City of Tigard. However, even in these arrangements, we maintain our own records as to what the fees'would'.be if we were on our regular basis. In' the long run, we make every attempt for the actuarial charges to the client, even in the public sector, to be as close as possible to our regular charge ;basis. We have set the fees in the proposal at a level which we feel should be adequate to cover our charges. " However, we will review our actual charges at the conclusion of the project and make adjustments -- down- ward -- if it 'should be that our proposed fee is larger than our actual charges. For these reasons, the fee given below should be looked at as the maxi- mum fee for the period. If our review of actual charges against the fee schedule turns out to be in the City's favor, we.will -reduce the fees accordingly. Based upon'similar work we have done recently for other clients, the fee for this;project will not exceed $12,000. Ifou have any y questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Mark 0. J n on, F.S.A. Consulti g ctuary MOJ:dm PRPSI_ K4 MILLIMAN & ROBERTSON, INc. CQN6ULTIMG ACTUARIES s WILLIAM M. MERCER Benefit Services/Consulting Actuaries April 16, 1984 Ms. 'Jerri >L. .Widner Finance Director City of Tigard 12755 S. W. Ash P. 0. Box23397' Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Proposal of Services Dear Ms. Widner: We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide consulting services to the City of Tigard in the area of retirement plans. We are uniquely' qualified to assist you in formulating a retirement plan policy for the following reasons: 1. We have extensive ',experience' in working with pension plan sponsors in setting retirement plan policy. - 2. We often work with public sector employers. 3. We have met many times with employee committees to discuss retirement policy. 4. We are able to present graphically, in an easy to understand format, various retirement plan choices. 5. We can use our portable computers to calculate benefits and illustrate policy choices in interactive conversations with employee committees, We believe this proposal will demonstrate our expertise in these areas. We hope you conclude that we are the consultants best suited to your needs. I look forward to discussing this proposal with you further. If you should have any questions or if you would like to schedule a time when we can get together, please give me a call. Sincerely, i obert T. cCrory, FSA MAAA Actuary RTM/pm Enclosures A M.0+h R ,,ltt!rnndn Ceorgia-Pacific Building • Portland,Oregon 97204 -503 226.9500 MERCER Benefit Services/Consulting Actuaries PROPOSAL OF ACTUARIAL 'CONSULTING SERVICES FOR C I T Y OF TIG A R D Prepared By: Robert T, McCrory, FSA, MAAA, Actuary William M. Mercer - Meidin.ger, Incorporated April 16, 1984 A Marsh&McLennan Company Georgia-Pacific Building Portland,Oregon 97204_° 503 226-9500 wM 02; FIR -- —� ME E William M.Mercer, Incorporated 4 f f F { TABLE OF CONTENTS i� • f ` t: 3 t. Fq k55 5. i PROJECT OUTLINE EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES . 8 , { ESTIMATED FEES t: FOR OUR SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ` OUR FIRM . . . . . . . . . 12 I � OUR PEOPLE . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 11j { E t Proposal of,Services City of Tigard (4-16-84) ii a I. William M.Mercer,IncorPOrated f y PROJECT.OUTLINE F We have presented below a tentative project outline. This outline is [! meant to be a tentative indication of the way the project might proceed; it ismeant to provide a framework for our initial discussions. This outline should also enable the City of Tigard to evaluate our recommended consulting approach to the problem at t, hand. r . We anticipate that the consulting assignment will proceed in seven 4 steps: ` 4 1, The initial meeting, 2. A seminar on retirement plan policy issues, 3. Data gathering activities, 4. Actuarial studies, 5. Decision-making meetings, 6. Report to City Council, and 7, Implementation. Each of the above steps is discussed in detail below. Q Initial Meeting i , The goal of our initial meeting would be for our consultants to 1 j meet the review committee and involved staff. At our meeting we would discuss the future direction of the retirement plan study; we could use this project outline as the basis for our discussions. Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-84) 1 William M.Mercer,Incorporated During this meeting, we would attempt to gather as much ' information about the current plans as possible. in particular:'` 1. All current plan documents, i 2. All cl,J rrent ;plan booklets, 3. All a _vial reports dealing with the current plans, if any, 4. Information on benefits accrued by employees under the various;plans, and< 5. Financial data. C t Once this data has been gathered, we will by in a position to i prepare for the next phase of the project. a Pension- Policy Seminar Setting retirement plan policy is an extremely important undertaking that should involve the employee review committee, f -- involved staff and, if possible, members of the City Council. Retirement plan policy affects the employees' security and financial well-being, as well as the fiscal policy of the City. it impacts compensation and personnel philosophy. " Because of the important and far-reaching effects of your retirement plan policy, we strongly recommend a seminar on this subject to include as many of the involved groups as possible employees, staff, and City Council. Topics to be discussed would include the following: k 1. General Retirement Plan Concepts - We will discuss the available -types of retirement plans and the policies involved in the choice of a retirement plan. E For example, retirement plans are generally divided into defined benefit and defined contribution retirement F! plans. The distribution of cost by employee age is Proposal of Services - City of Tigard {4-16-84) 2 r r7 s William M. Mercer,hcorporawed- S radically different under the two types of retirement s defined benefit plans favoring older plans, with j employees and defined contribution plans favoring younger employees. This is illustrated in the graph below. cape®y®r Cast by O.t® SO e sit I1© �t So 47 ® 4s ; A 63 f 40 45 5 83 23 95 ® DOT Ott AS, Der cant i see from this graph. y As you retirement our choice of the ®u can P . type plan has a direct impact on the compensation various groups of employees receive. In 'y the type of retirement plan affects the addition, Yp financial risk borne by the City and the risk borne by the employees, as well as the level and distribution of benefits. A11 of these issues will be discussed in the seminar using gP ra hs S,, .n aao the above. The graphs will be tailored to you narCicular situation. In addition to the issues surrounding choice of plan i we will also discuss concept of retirement plan 3 Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-84) NO ff- William M.Mer€er'incerporated adequacy.; We will illustrate the benefit "needed to replace pre-retirement standard of living and demonstrate the role of Social Security, retirement s plans, and individual savings in providing an adequate post-retirement standard of living. 2. Measures of Comparability It has been our experience that employees and plan sponsors usually have no idea how their retirement plan compares with other retirement plans run by comparable entities. To remedy this situation, we will review various studies of plan provisions, plan benefits, and plan cost that are available, both locally and nationally. These measures of comparability will serve as yardsticks against which to measure your current plans and the design of any future retirement plan. _., 3. Review of Current Plans After providing the .._ background above, we will review your current retirement plans. We will determine what types of plans they are, the level of benefits in absolute terms, , pay, and in comparison with the as a percentage of standards of adequacy previously discussed. i In making these comparisons, we intend to have the benefits provided under all of your retirement plans I programmed on our portable computer. At the seminar we will be able to compute benefits under a variety of possible scenarios for any of your employees. We have previously designed an interactive presentation with another client; it was most helpful in assisting them in setting policy. An example of the output from our computer program is shown below. i Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-g4) 4 X,a= RZOM IN William M.Mercer, Incorporated Calculate PERS Denefit®--> worksheet No. 2a Calcul®tion of Don-fits step is Enter E-Ploy- Datalstep tot Projected Retiroeent.Dan-fits Ages 40 (tFoareut)l Ninthly Hire ago, 30.(t3aareat)tsource q0a Amount % Pay % ISdacq SalarYt 420,000 1 p 45.15% S Classy O.O-Gon svcI PERS 58 S2,t48.0050.= .. t-Fn GOP t t 33 51.223.80 .30.64% 39.58X 2-PI&F i Marri.cJs 1 O–Ho 0 8S 66 52,735.62 37.50% 74.28X lyes - 1 6201,781.90 44.61% 57.62% x:. t/one 12O In.hours ID�f58 60.00 .COO . VaeeO.00X O.OUX .Caovertlaee O t 55 50.00 0.00% '0.00% Compo 12 :1 (. .. 54,683.62 102.66% 132.60% Gick■ O 1 Total 66 DC Data f0 1 62 53,005.70 .75.25% :,97.20% f. } In addition to reviewing the level of benefits provided by the current< plans, we will assess their cost, both {' in absolute terms and in comparison with other local and national retirement plans. ( r 4. Decisions - We will decide on our future course of t action in light of the information presented. We must - s determine if any additional information is needed in order to design a new retirement plan for the City of Tigard. If possible, we should make some preliminary decisions about the new retirement plan; we should be at least able to determine the type of plan desired and I some preliminary design goals. A half day will probably be required for the seminar; sufficient time should be allotted to deal with the many policy issues that will arise. Once the seminar is over and we have a common base of knowledge, we can proceed to design the new retirement plan. e Gathering Additional Data Based on our preliminary design, we will be in a position to determine if.any additional data is needed to refine or price the plan design. Such data may include employee surveys or questionnaires, employee age and service data if needed for i Proposal of Services City of :Tigard (4-16-84) 5 SM William M.Mercer,incorporated actuarial costs, or possible input from the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). Throughout our discussions` we must keep in mind that joining the PERS system is an option for any governmental entity in the state. Joining PERSmay or may not be desirable based on benefit policy, and cost considerations. ® >Perform Needed Actuarial Studies Actuarial studies may not ,be needed.= However, ; if a "defined benefit plan is elected by the review committee, involved staff, and City Council, actuarial studies will be necessary to determine future;plan liabilities and costs. ® Meeting to Finalize Plan Design Once all information has been gathered, the studies made, and the policy issues decided, we will meet to finalize the plan design and work out the details of the transition from the current retirement plans to the new plan. f ® Report to City Council E It would be desirable for some or all of the members of the City Council to be involved in the design process as extensively as possible. The agenda laid out above is extensive; it will not be possible to completely summarize all aspects of it in any single written or verbal report to the City Council. If extensive participation by the City Council is not possible, a series of interim reports should be prepared and presented. Of course, City Council action will be required to implement the committee's recommendations. At the final stage of the project we will make the necessary written and oral reports to the City Council to enable them to reach their decision. 3 Proposal of Services - City of Tigard _(4-16-84) 6 _ — rA C= W t William M.Mercer, incorporated t g Imple-ne� ntation Depending upon the final plan design, you may wish toinvolve our firm in the implementation of your new retirement plan. Proper implementation of a new retirement plan entails proper communications with the employees, the establishment of administrative mechanisms, and a 'review of possiblesnvestment vehicles and fund managers. We have extensive experience in all three of these areas and will be available to help you to whatever extent you find necessary. As we indicated above, the aboveoutline is tentative, but it seems to us to be a proper approach to solving your retirement plan problems. The above approach is structured and 'yet allows sufficient flexibility. It will provide you, your staff, and your employees with a base of information from which to set policy. i 1, 7 Proposal of Services _ City of Tigard (4-16-84) Zkol William M. Mercer, Incorporated ® City of Redmond For the City of Redmond, we undertook to analyze current retirement plans, two of 'which were being maintained with private insurance companies. As a result of our analysis, they elected to 'join the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System. We facilitated their entry into PERS and explained the change to their employees and to the City Council. Our principal contact at the City of Redmond was Mr. Bob McWilliams, City Manager, (503) 548-2148. ® =Josephine County. We provide; annual actuarial" valuations and consulting actuarial services for Josephine County. In addition, we have had several meetings with a committee consisting of some of the key supervisors of County departments. These meetings have dealt primarily with setting retirement plan policy. Our principal contact at Josephine County is Ms. Mary Callahan, Personnel Technician, (503) 474-5220. ® Bay Area Hospital We perform the annual actuarial work required for Bay Area Hospital's Retirement Plan. In addition, we are involved with them currently in a project to analyze potential changes to their Retirement Plan. We have met with their management team to discuss pension policy. Our principal contact at Bay Area Hospital is Ms. Donna Utley, Director of Human Resources, (503) 269-8111, t Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-84) 9 t William M. Mercer, Incorporated f .. All of the above projects are recent. All of them have involved public entities concerned with formulating retirement plan policy. Therefore, all of the above examples reflect on our experience in the area most critical to this consulting 'project on your behalf. In the past, we have also ::corked on consulting and policy setting projects for the City of Beaverton, the City of Vancouver, Washington, the City of Seattle, and the Washington State Board for Community College Education. v �s Proposal of Services City of Tigard (4-16-84) 10 4 William M. Mercer, Incorporated ESTIMATED FEES FOR OUR SERVICES i 1 i We bill for our services on a time-and-expense basis. Each employee has an hourly rate which is ,applied by our computerized timekeeping system to the time the employee spends on each client. ' The result j serves as a guide for our billings. L E Our hourly rates vary from '$30 to $170 per hour, depending on the a . expertise of the personnel involved. Our management 'policy is to t assign projects to the employee with the lowest billing ;rate who is competent to handle the work. Billings are produced monthly. In general, billings are;equal to the hourly time charges incurred by our employees involved, along with s any computer or other expenses incurred. The invoice sent to the client may be slightly higher or lower than the time charges incurred, depending on whether there was special value added by the work i involved or whether there was training time or inefficiencies deducted. The project that the City has outlined in its Request for Proposal is somewhat vague in scope. Because the amount of time required is . . . difficult. to specify, our fee. estimate is somewhat approximate. As an estimate, based on the outline presented above, we would estimate fees in the vicinity of $9,000 to $13,000 for the consulting process through the presentation to the City Council. Any implementation duties would bring about additional charges. You will be billed, as time charges are incurred; we have no set predetermined fees. Therefore, you will be able to monitor and control your consulting costs as they are incurred. Proposal of Services City of Tigard (4-16-84) William M.Mercer,incorporated OUR FIRM William M. Mercer - Meidinger, Incorporated is a wholly owx.ed subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Incorporated; we are a publicly held employee benefit and compensation consulting company. We have over 70 offices in the United States, 24 in Canada, and others in major cities throughout the rest of the world. We have a staff of more than 2,500 employees, which includes over 331 consultants and 280 actuaries, in addition to a variety of other professionals, technicians and specialists. Enclosed is a copy of the Marsh & McLennan Companies, Incorporated 1983 Annual Report. Its contents' should familiarize you with the size and scope of our firm and with its principal officers. In addition to the Marsh & McLennan Companies Annual Report, a pamphlet is enclosed describing the general organization and scope of services of William M. Mercer - Meidinger, Incorporated. Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-84) 12 Al �i�s-1 gra" 4 ,t 's w S William M. Mercer, Incorporated k i OUR PEOPLE, We operate on a team consulting basis - two consultants are assigned < one with primary and one with secondary account to each account, our clients of continuity, responsibility. This system assures availability of staff and a superior product through the exchange of ideas. The individuals who would be assigned`to assist you have had many years of experience in the pension field. The following is a brief biography of those Mercer - Meidinger professionals who would be most involved. e Robert T McCrory, FSA, MAAA Mr. McCrory is a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries, a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries, an Enrolled Actuary; he heads the Pension Consulting Department. Prior to joining Mercer - Meidinger, Incorporated in March 1977, he was employed in the group actuarial department of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in New York City and San Francisco. - ® DennMona ghan, FSA MAAA Mr. Monaghan is a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries and a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries; he adds eight years to the pension staff expertise. A graduate of Portland State University and the University of Nebraska, he has experience in both group and pension consulting. Mr._ Monaghan served as actuary for an insurance company and a Southern California consulting firm before joining Mercer - Meidinger. Proposal of Services - City off Tigard (4-16-84) 13 w 5 William M Mercer,Incorporated p� e Mark R Ferrin - ASA, Associate Actuary 4, Mr. Ferrin is an actuarial student with five exams passed; he has over two years of experience with an insurance company, earned after four years of post-graduate education in statistics. He has completed work towards his Associateship in the Society of Actuaries. He provides statistical analysis and software development for the Pension Consulting Department. ® Marian K. Geist - `Actuarial Assistant Ms. Geist is a graduate of Northern State College in Aberdeen, S.D., with a B.S. in Math Education. She has passed one actuarial exam. She brings administrative and compliance 4 abilities to our staff, o Jeffrey M Higgins Actuarial:Assistant Mr. Higgins is a graduate of Willamette University. He has passed three actuarial exams and specializes in computer programming and compliance duties. e Patricia Merillat - Executive Secretary An office organization chart is enclosed. In addition to the individuals listed above, our national professional, technical and clerical staff will become involved as necessary. Any member of the William M. Mercer - Meidinger, Incorporated organization whose talents can be applied to enhance our abilities will be employed to serve you. In support of our staff, we have a substantial computer capability in Portland. Data preparation and actuarial computer operations are handled locally. This not only allows rapid access to employee data, Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-84) 14 -- William M.Mercer,Incorporated s confidentiality: Our data processing but also helps ensure itk ' capabilities are further strengthened by the availability of a strong } computer staff in our Seattle office. Our Mercer - Meidinger Library Information Network keeps all of our latest developments in pension plans and consultants informed on the other employee benefits. In addition, our consultants are able to draw upon reports and papers prepared by others in the Mercer Meidanger organization, thus enabling us to effectively pool a 1 ' our experience and expertise. A k Y; Z.. : 1.: S f: Proposal of Services City of Tigard (4-16•-114) 15 - William M.Mercer, Incorporated x F H :i O Z x. < z H ty o < .Z. < F H < w x h u Q < w w vii x a`np Z -r < .e W H DG < < Q E' :n x (n a w a to w < 2 .� to <. a W I W p < ` W < t F w E+ l 04 E- << I � r C6 ZC4 0 O Zw w H < < v < < t, F H Z y F w Z 4 H = .I U U U a .. I,,,sn < Z -� V a m .�w a a cw E" 94 to �N p Z ��w° > W M V O a Zz< Z H x q 5 -0 w [+ M F _ w V_ v < Xw w V U < w Hz w O p — O w w y I• ►:<w z H al - a rst H w b � U O Z w x < a , cx e� w a > to w < u w < wx z r" w a , 04 < a Z I, < < a a a N w U u < Q U < 1 < ® : a a 3c � 4 > F` C4 F Z < a U w C4 Nd n a u " w a• a 94 z 54 U H p � rI Proposal of Services - City of Tigard (4-16-84) 16 _ .. =am= IPMIIROW .w e CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM #: , DATE SUBMITTED: April 16, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Consent - League of Oreton Cities Agreement REQUESTED BY: Bob Jean DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: e INFORMATION SUMMARY The League of Oregon Cities has requested that each city adopt the attached Intergovernmental Agreement in order to continue Leaguemembershipfor 1984-85 fiscal year. The Agreement is ,designed to formally recognize the League's status as 'a.public agency created by cities to serve their needs. 4 G i F d s ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED t - Adopt resolution and agreement and be a member of LOC. Don't take any action and not be a member of LOC. t SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt attached resolution authorizing Mayor and City Administrator to sign agreement to allow City of Tigard to be a member of the League of Oregon Cities. s - , • , League of Oregon Cities SALEM.Local Government Center, 1201 Court Street N.E,P.O.Box 928,Salem 97308,Telephone:15031 EUGENE.- Hendricks Hall,University of Oregon,P.O.Boz 3177,Eugene 97403, Telephone 1503;686-5232, t -- U 1. i _ Salem, Oregon March 23, `1984 MAR ® "1984 To: City Managers and Recorders of Oregon Cities Subject,: 1984-85 Annual Membership Fee Enclosed is an information copy of the statement for League membership dues for your city for the 1984-85 fiscal year. The amount of dues is based on the most recent population figure for your city by the Center for Population Research and Census. The dues schedule remains the same as for the past year - 27.5 cents per capita. The minimum membership fee of $66 also remains unchanged `from ,this past year. The amount indicated on the enclosed statement will ;be due on July 1, 1984, and we shall appreciate having you include this amount in your budget. There is one additional item that needs attention as part of this dues mailing. The enclosed Intergovernmental Agreement must be adopted by your city council and returned to the League in order to continue League membership for the 1984-85 fiscal year. You may recall that the Agreement is designed to formally recog- nize the League's status as a public agency created by cities to serve their needs. The Agreement generally just restates the League's constitution which has been in effect for many years. Drafts of the .Agreement were reviewed by City attorneys throughout the state last Spring. In the Fall , a copy of the Agreement was mailed to every city. Changes were made to accommodate various suggestions that were offered. Then the Agreement was thoroughly discussed at the resolutions committee meeting at the Annual Conference in November, where the document was approved by unanimous vote at the Annual Business Meeting. 9 To facilitate your adoption process we are enclosing a sample resolution for you � to use, or you may use an ordinance for adoption of the agreement if your legal counsel should so choose. We would appreciate it if you would attach a copy of the enacted resolution/ordinance to a copy of the 190 Agreement and return it to the League office at your earliest convenience. Your city needs to keep a copy of the enacted ordinance/resolution on file with your original copy of the 190 Agreement. If you have any questions about the dues statement, or about League activities or programs, please feel free to contact any of the League Executive Committee members or members of the League staff. Every city in Oregon receives many OFFICERS:Ruth Burleigh,commissioner,Bend,president O Mayor DIRECTORS:Mayor George Flitcraft,Klamath Falls•Lynn Hamilton,city manager,La Grande Mayor Gerald"Lou"Hannum,Medford, Alan Berg,Corvallis,vice president:*Mayor Elvern Hall,Newberg, immxdiete past president*Mary Schamehorn,councilor,Bandon O Mildred Schwab,commissioner,Portland OJohn Shirley,councilor, treasurer 0 Stephen Bauer,executive director, Salem 0 Kent Taylor,city manager,Lincoln City 9 Mayor Winston Walker,Canyonvillo 0 Mayor Margaret Well.Gresham. s City Managers and Recorders of Oregon Cities March 23, 1984. Page 2 benefits from the programs and activities of the League. There are now 235 of the 242 cities in the state contributing to the support of the League. The continued support of your city is appreciated by your League officers. Sincerely, Elvern Hail Treasurer SCB:aj Enclosures 1 s "" •ate— _s m , fl i ✓ f �D RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND OF THE CITY OF TO EXECUTE AND ENDORSE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES GOVERNING THE LEAGUE STATUS AS A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, SIMILAR TO OTHER COOPERATIVE INTER-GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES IN WHICH CITIES CREATE AND PARTICIPATE, 8 WHEREAS, the Council has found that it is necessary and desirable to endorse and adopt the agreementproposed by the League of Oregon Cities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City .of that the Mayor and are hereby authorized to execute and endorse the agreement with the League of Oregon Cities of which the City of is a member, governing the League status as a unit of local government, similar to other cooperative inter-governmental agE::cies that cities create and participate in, all this in the State of Oregon, upon the terms and conditions as set forth in an �._ of which i s agreement entitled "Inter-governmental Agreement of Oregon Cities," a copy attached hereto as Exhibit "A ;" and incorporated by reference herein. DATED this day of 1984. a City Council ATTEST: f EXHIBIT "A• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON p COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM k: Consent Aril 23, 1984 ld t AGENDA OF: P 4/18J84 PREVIOUS ACTION: 3/12/84 DATE SUBMITTED: ` Building Height Limits r. ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: REQUESTED BY: Tilp Occupany Permit CITY ADMINISTRATOR:- F DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: INFORMATION SUMMARY s to On 3/12/$4 Council reviewed hensive1Plan'and nBugilding Code lasntoabuilding fheight interpretation of the COMP re limits. ; Council di rece1dheYaff to ascreeningce the fence ordreductionein the hvisibility earea } essentially requiring ` of the window. On 4/10/84 staff received a request from Mrs. Tilp (home owner) responding to Mrs. Clinton's and staff's comments, and requesting timewile on Council agenda. Since 'then the Tilpng's have submitted plans which and estlthatuce thetCouncilif ndLea thatsthe required. Staff has reviewed the plans permit have been made subject to final conditions for issuance of an occupancy ,' inspection of the Building Official. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. »et another Council discussion. 2. Accept staff report finding Code compliance. _------- SUGGESTED ACTION cmpliance # 2. Accept the staff report and att themtts ifiicating Code ono oapproval bydthe direct issuance of Occupancy Permxtsubject Building Official. F MEMORANDUM F; CITY OF `TIGARD, OREGON p z t, li TO: Ed Walden, Building Official March 13, 1984 ' FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development ki SUBJECT: Building Height Limit - .14185" SW 98th Ct. At the City Council meeting of March 12, 1984, the Council dealt with the ' interpretation of Section 18.98.030 of the Community Development Code as it concerns the above named property. , Following; a presentation by Mrs. Clinton and my; input, the Council determined that condition #3 of Section 18.98.030 has not been fully,met. It reads: r "3. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mitigating direct views 'without loss of solar access to any dwelling unit;, or that such trees exist and will be preserved." The Council found that since the windows on the southerly side are in excess of fifteen feet high, the property owner must take steps to either: 1)plant trees in conformance with section 3 or 2) take steps to reduce the window area so that there is no window space above 15 feet above grade. I have explained to the Council that it is the property owner's right to choose a solution. ft $' Since it is the Council's finding that the Community Development Cade Section s 18.98.030 (3) has not been fully met, please require that the property owner , take steps to alleviate the problem prior to issuance of a completion notice and certificate of occupancy. I'm sure that you recognize the sensitivity of this issue given the community input. I' Please advise me of the property owner's chosen course of action and the ultimate outcome of this issue. (WAM:pm;0355P) �r d, -INK "goo __ RECEIVED ED (Midu :( ; 1p and Janet Maxwell -Yilp ' j44y ) S. l.`E, k!(?th i3lacc' CITY OF TIGARU . parc . ureg on nP Planning city _op 11g rr•d, ,l, +~zyol; Dear Mr, l'tllilf lir.6i!! to n•' T`%_, our til n '• .'t G goti Ful Itou timeiid C.{pl1. t ,-Ition{r at our We war?'t t ,E. tn n 'c,s new hfatlsc at: 1 85 S. W, "larch "3 ire c `il�f+ s.(1, v iT ui l ? !lt .k atlti � ? to d a viabl crP Y`},jth f_ C1l+rt•, 11C4�. have wSk 1 w Fh title tl C6Rt £ C#-� 1{;ikfT C :?t¢i ,6 't:.LE {:L 1711 t.).1 " iCr;.T llt six {'"itiSPteve1', t•IC' .'fills f_,t, or tt1Ci '1 C cor'Ur t�i've' 0vl` to the ' own inputs t11'1 this, i,k ° tf?_ ( £iT•q" rj; 4 Ckmi' t rvn ca-- tli"GfiiYic ( ill t1lV 1 E 1'4t Y'i7 t:f' rk i Ptlr'r t .1-p h £ :.6k1 C'0011C il M e;t"g- 1 -sorile important 3 sf> }:` regarding r, ( k C:oUnC i 1.. Ultimately,. we° hope..'E£7 i.p s.h£' t6iilaS,„t ;iEl`. nizt"E.ill .. tG 't'lh 7..$ S_ F r f March 0 'i.£. !Cert. t'r: 't=ilt C:i"ty C.oul"c J is the First, an error '" frE, �.iF'�•1 ii.., _ iu t<i�' t statement: : t•il PL OF t,i3 itf t�i.'t:1.< h9 }. [30 r "The housV to situated oil the access durin£J the jtr `�.I Shite!' heating f F? Cell��wi1 T tie miItimaI ckt. t!f�t� C:lintoRrs pruiperty. without tree t7'l:7ilti:it fi:cr E717 i ,.r�1 ,i !.hc View £?, fr: - 1 , F;;1.. lr c} s e;E'1( waiidc,tAi in .tui. t�uC the 4.'`.SkJ'?r at:;e t ,71`i;t el lk '1 „ this 5 i. !.tk Ca is 7 t3'I'6 :t' ;� rii o C k i• tl.:o•' 3 ` treVC C t . 6� wtlrn 'h" }! s t !la sTliCmEl{ X ; the lc ( CC <iCC' ! F� ] 3f ( l n9ri -i ' lowest sea;-oral levul t1 ' Crcan. house n eves h10Cr Crr C,Ur' very late vrring. "Hie houcet solaraccC5s at riny ti-ills.'. off tiles. £it .f°. 1 !!t'_':°C• iii4_'ii�lt.T't?mGiltS' have been confirmed r+ 7 it the �aC !'t�'t olc:•k f: f Ci11 3.I1�.'w: J.1 C'7`5 and by observation t']CE t:itW housE .,C, li s of the sun at kwin t', soi�nLicz-. ( ht3.i, iU k' feel h 5C7.t c1 T' of CC•a.c° �tT`£;i.t(Yl f?itt �1 not a moot point. Second, firs. Clinton 's ti1C"112 t.o th 'l i Council xna.ltl(led E PT htsil�C=. it photogr 1ph:, t�lt,tll t rta!n our C. i?1'l it Floorin thf` 67rectTon of l should be uncirr t-ood t-•lTtat t-hc.'se p i c� i,Ir t, tat', F rr+4 e sT f(!n irlCt tht fT'r8rriiiiCi ster e c O the 110105c,, c-In Ct til l itl.:? +I7 'w at that t7.rllc of tier house Prom ou'1' hoti=C. Wa unobstructed by interim Ilk ?J l f tiCt 6Jl t'C T Clinton 's at 'C:hou e at wa l l :and sheet T ork telt , iet,l Oil i>J :iRi:nn ' house hay, been ' x°iEi.tk�d. 'i�hs�� have been in:ter ll:f'£1, k J.or=t<i.Rkt auR'I'CSolil windows lit C(uti`_:t.7ClR can S:3rl}.kk (?E J oo{r d out op by F) r st through a �:r!; l�1�, in window which is 11 l•et:'t From the: exterior st!Rrvoill thr througlh 1h F+pG:CC' between rti8 =rIL4}7'?0l` Gild oxtf rioT S6ikndows is open to the firs,,t fIvor. ihtl , tiT£ phot ograph< t,T e? eril�.ed dial not, e.hotu the cur'r`ent vieak+ out the suRT'cicirll tlilkcia,tal:;. Third, as you indicated in your i(a-r'ch 7 VVt ()rt:, the primary UseeT��ithe gunroom windows i.s For" ho;at; collection. 1he willdow 's pu'r pcls? is /iewiiTtd, rath ?r ihrse wilTdtl+1?3 a'rta an irltrgJTs9l. part of the he�<a isif <+nd cvckli.ng system on1g, We understand this i?; a �.nY?' i.t:i.we lit;:ift:r', but We t'£'e ), ou'r point: SIF view 1. should be, and should havehr eTT, i.nciudod in the decision of the City Council . F'il+rs, sire wotl�.d bclt11 J.i.ke t.tl a{(C rt R. ; the CTitJ Council. with the above r•mation. IF we understood what you .,tai d J-1 tT6+r flearr_h �'.S 'th rlTet>tft Weirlfo his is need 'to arranne rctt;a.i'11J t:hs item tic1l +re thc.' Council throulih you. 1f t:. true, please rerral�ye ihi.s and let us know as to any Further' prot'ec'Llre� We must speak to tile C:cauncil Irt=�t•u scion, 85 t;tic• Cejmplefion dat. of t:hc bol+seer i-s mum f to T'£'_-olve this :issue, approaching (Mau �?, �a��c sue ilE'4.' oast D t`s l: tint) t-n ti ij t?i ! ��c�. 3'f�'! i3�. a, �,t,i1`vI �1:,i'��'k: 23 i�F'i E�_ �L' it3 £3 a a :,,1t* � 11 rii t:t:e>� pt z, .i all Et f .:�� ;.( .ct�f• �t�:i iII �r•, alith pmt uf- CE3 .tET" u7.Qft. °�.. t• ca?l i1}{131SCj r4 •;�.� { Et t, {s7 }.�It 7' C}i �':I1S } r£CtE�, Ftp ✓ c, rC �Sl'i£?t'rit Ci,. c, ° i 'tY,. it�C [a 'f`ovi dp 's;vitt hE ]"rp wv ca-n_ ''3''o We want to tw..E abrr Y "0 thisr ;c cr t n can cont-nct us bt;. .pilU."t'. <1T. t,r,�.r� t it:3it (Nidt,1 � dfat.! i.}f .i t: ii{'t) 'Ct'E' t.>t'i% 1;7�,�.} ::.(tio(tte). SinCvrI{jt i 1 April 17, 1984 Andy Tilp ;and Janet Maxwell—T 1p 14495 S. W. '88th Place Tigard, Oregon 97223 Mr. Bill Monahan VIER Director of Planning city of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 APR i� GIT ' OF ioGARD Dear Mr. Monahan, pLAm jt4G DEPT. In regards to the city council directive of March 12 concerning the height of the sainroomwindows at our 14185 S. W. 99th Court ,house. Enclosed is a drawing showing ;a proposed solution, Please evaluate the design and Set us know if it meets the ,city's satisfaction. ot mark. The valance will block the view out � wofdtheavaiancebove � use eat15 �ll still ' And, dose to the vent openings along thetop have the abilityto collect the heat that would be otherwise lost if the F windows were bLocked; in some ether manner. If you have any questions on this design, please call m€ at 685-3398 (day), or the designer, Gary Petty, at 646--6145• We hope this designs is � - satisfactory. Thank you for your consideration and time. Sincerely, T ��-� ' Andy Tilp Janet Maxwell.—Tile ' i i TO Gkl1f is + C~ TOG{"1-»4D6�- ` — — — -- _ ( i a P _ MCA Q -- p �g -j 4 " `l MEMOP.ANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development FROM: Ed Walden, Building Official 07-7() DATE: April 17, M4' SUBJECT: Possiblesolution to window height requirement at 14185 SW 98th Ct. 'dwelling. After reviewing the written statement and 'drawing from Andy Tilp and Janet Tilp, proposing a solution to the window over height at the .subject addresF, I am of the opinion that thisinstallationof either (A) or (B) Valance when properly installed and permanently maintained will meet the intent of the requirement of having no windows that can be seen through over 15' feet above the approved exterior grade of this structure. `' - _ CITY, OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY j f} AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED:'' 4/16/84 PREVIOUS ACTION: OLCC License Approval ISSUE/AGENDA. TITLE: ' OLCC License Renewal REQUESTED BY: Applicant r DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: �— t p INFORMATION SUMMARY' This application is an annual renewal of a Class A dispenser license THE STADIUM CLUB' 11445 SW Pacific Hwy. , Tigard, OR 97223 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Renew 2. Continue to 5/14/84 for additional information from staff. SUGGESTED ACTION #2. Staff recommends continuance of this item to 5/14/84. (0409P) l` CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON } .' COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 _ _ AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: April 16, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Consent - Resolution Opposing BPA's Proposed REQUESTED BY: Bob Jean Avera.e S stem Cost Rate Plan DEPARTMENT DEAD OK; CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Portland General Electric has supplied information regarding proposed changes which would dramatically ;affect the electric rates for Oregonresidents. Bonneville Power Administration plans to change the average system, cost methodology which would result in a 'rate increase of up to 38 percent for residential and small-farm customers. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has final say over rates under the Regional' Power" Act. , Members of are interested and concerned about the effect of Congress from the Northwest rates and PGE is requesting the City to urge these decision makers to conduct a complete, open and unbiased review of the effect of the proposed changes. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Pass the attached resolution, pass an altered resolution, or not take action at this time. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff would recommend support of PGE's position of concern by passing the attached resolution which would encourage BPA to either withdraw the proposal, or at least permit adequate time for full public hearings on this change before July. __ Me—wnwlrw .. OEM - 1 City OKs promotion of water r s aty FXER NENZ .9141 .ot'Mo orn area Mayor Frank ivancie's economic de- velopment plans received a boost Wednesday when the Portland City Council agreed to spend$139,550 from the city's Water Fund money to pro- mote Portland's Bull Run water system. Together with another $45,000 in private contributions, the city plans to bottle 6-ounce promotional samples of the water,to establish'a local and na- tional water-information program and to nitract desirable maustries through an international'marketing program which targets firms thinking about moving or expanding. ^^.a:^? .".gike Lindberg said he initially was skeptical of the water promotion program, but his research has contAnced him that the approach makes sense.Lindberg said he is panic utatly impressed with the plan to target desirable industries. 11 think the program as developed is gtge sophisticated,"he said. i The vote was 4.0 with Commission- er-Charles Jordan.absent. — am cound#lagreed to le` -stxa- btrFg-and4v e. r�azi- :.: AW tag&Ad rate m ra 4 Bruce Landrey Portland General Electric Co. 'old C March 7, 1984 121 S.W.Salmon Street,Portland,Ore-ton 97204 (503) .226-8521. olations under the Regional Power Act Citing contract vi and the, potentialfor major rate increases as the cause, " regulatory commissions in two states and all of the Northwest's iiavestar-owned utilities today filed a lawsuit against the IIotanevillePower Administration. 'i°gae utilities include Portland General Electric Co. , 4: Pacific Power & Light Co„ Puget Sound Power & Light, Co. , Washington mater Power Co. , Idaho Power Co. , Montana Power Co. , Utah Power & Light Co. , and C-P National Oregon Public Utility Commissioner Gehe Maudlin and the Idaho i _ Y � Public Utility Commission also joined the lawsuit. It was <filed in U.S. District Court in Portland, Ore. BPA, wants to change the method used to give the utilities' residential and farm customers equal access to low-coat pie3r from federal hydrolectric project$. It +1an -to. make. the changes by July 1, 1984. f -more® t ...._ _ _ 1 I I=2 _tl t ' changes wo'lld result in rate PGE and PP&L estimate the t increases of as much as 38 percent for their Oregon customers. The lawsuit seeks a determination that the changes are being made too soon and are in violation_ of contracts calling for a public negotiation process. s SFA's plans, if not stopped, would be a financial disaster for our customers, " says PGE Board ChairmanPI Robert H. Short. c$ PGE's and pP&1,'s customers no`. get low-cost federal .. power through exchange agreements between the utilities and BPF . Under the exchange agreements, BPA sells power to I PGE and PP&L at the same rate it sells power to publicly owned utilities. z In turn, BPA buys an equal amount of power from f PGE and PP&L at their average cost of generating and trans- P muting electricity. The purchase price to BPA is referred to as "average system cost." i. The savings resulting from the difference in the two rates are gassed directly to residential and farm customers. I ' customers will ,save an estimated $1�7 in 1984, PGE s and PP&L s f mi lion because of the exchange agreements: z t� -more- r 3 Y ... - : . NEW BPA, however, is proposing a new way to calculate average system cost. The benefits to residential and farm customers will be cut by more than one-half if BPA follows through with its plans. .t Oregon's PUC and'the utilities object to BPA's proposed schedule, as well as to the specific changes. Agreements between the utilities and BPA require an extensive public comment process and a specific time frame for changing average system cost. The lawsuit asks that BPA Pe. requir�xd to stick to the agreements and not start the t prgcsea to make �szxy changes until either September 1384 or Januaz—1 1985. d' 4` 1 DRAFT 3/29/84 RESOLUTION re ASC/BPA WFMREAS, hundreds of thousands of Oregonians have and should continue to benefit from the power exchange provisions of the Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980; • EA , the extent of these benefits dor residential and rural customers has been determined by a methodology developed by the utility regulatory coaissions of the four Northwest states and approved by the Bonneville Power Administration on August 26, 1981; WHEP-FAS, the Bonneville Power Administrator is now unilaterally proposing a complete revision of that methodology which would substantially increase F residential and rural electric customers up to as much as 38 percent and a deny these ratepayers the full benefits of the power exchange provisions promised under the Acta P WHEREAS, the Bonneville Power Administrator has not provided sound justification for E f ' proposing changes in the current paver exchange methodology, , i nor has he accepted reasonable requests for impartial hearings on this EPA directed revision; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: is/are• opposed to the arbitzary and biased revision to the current residential and rural power exchange methodology proposed by the administrator, and we call upon the administrator to either withdraw this unfair proposal, or at least permit � . adequate time and circumstances for full and independent public hearings on this changes before he allows this intolerable, discriminatory provision to occ,ir this July. ORION MMI, 1 m f ISSUE ff BPA!S PLAN TO REDUCE REGIONAL POWER ACT BENEFITS sm Average system M R cost defined Summary es proposed char es IM The facts about the changes im action Moeter. a, PGEfs ANALYSIS OF a I g f e ry M CHANGE THE AVERAGE SYSTEM COST METHODOLOGYE AN IN-DEPTH ' On February 3, 1984,the Bonneville Power Administration(BPA) published a new proposed average system cost(ASC)methodology.This new proposed methodology is a radical departure from the methodology currently in place.The current methodology is the result of extended negotiations between all interested parties in the Northwest and has only received final approval on January 10,1984 from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.The justification,timing,and content of BPA's proposal displays misconceptions of the Regional Power Act and the workings of the current methodology,along with a disregard for many basic principles used in accounting and setting electric rates. BPA's proposal will destroy the Regional Power Act's benefits to millions' of customers of investor-owned utilities in the Northwest.PGE's residential and small-farm customers'rates will increase by as much as _ 38 percent if BPA's proposal is implemented in July 1954.These benefits' were key to the regional consensus that culminated in the enactment of the Regional;Power Act.BPA's proposal ignores the requirements of the Act that the Average System Cost be calculated on current year costs. Its timing ignores the contractual requirements for a one-year waiting period after FERC approval before it can begin the process to change the methodology.BPA's attempt to increase rates to customers of investor owned utilities in the Northwest must be stopped. Regional The power exchange was a central facet in developing the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act(Regional Power Power Act).This Act,which became law on December 5, 1980,was the result of five years of extensive negotiation and consultation between energy producers,users, interested groups,and BPA.It is designed to provide a _ new basis for power planning in the region,assure a power supply for the region's aluminum smelters and that homes and farms served by private and public utilities have comparable rates. The power exchange was a part of drafts of the Regional Power Act beginning in 1977.Although the form of the exchange evolved over the years,the substance stayed the same.As a matter of equity,the framers of the Regional Power Act believed residential customers in Portland and other parts of the Northwest who are served by investor-owned utilities should be guaranteed the same access to the inexpensive energy resource of the Columbia River system as residential customers of publicly owned utilities in Clark County,or Seattle. Each Northwest patty of the Regional Act helped create a consensus.Public power was assured continuing access to the Columbia River by the provisions of rate guarantees.The direct-service industrial customers,mostly aluminum smelters,agreed to shoulder the costs of providing mate relief to residential customers in exchange for new long-term contracts.Private utilities agreed not to dispute the foregoing in return for securing rate relief for their residential customers.This spirit of cooperation has been called the"regional deal." The deal was not simple.Any arrangement for future energy supply in the Pacific Northwest must consider the interest of each of the parties, provisions for conservation,protection of wildlife,and the solution to the complex financial problems faced by BPA and WPPS.S. 9 10 M 0 Power Exchange Section 5(c)(1)of the RPA provides that Northwest electric utilities may sell electric power to the BPA at their"Average System Cost"(ASC)of resources.BPA;in turn,shall offer in exchange an equivalent amount of electric power to the utility.The amount will be equal to the electrical _ power demands of the utilities',residential and small-farm customers. Currently,the sale of power by BPA to the Northwest utilities is at their preference customer rate(priority firm rate).The difference between the utilities'.ASC and BPA priority firm tate is a credit applied directly and in total to the bilis of the residential and small farm customers. ExcFmange CoM Less There has been some confusion about the cost of the exchange.BPAThan Exp". ed a often reports only what,it pays utilities,without deducting what the j - utilities pay BPA for the power they exchanged In effect,the exchange is a purchase by BPA of the average cost of energy used to`serve`the resi- dential customer and a purchase by that customer of the same energy at EPA's preference rate.Since the energy;does not need to be exchanged, the true result is a check written by BPA to pay for the difference.The size of the check in this operating year is$256 million.This is well within the expectations when the Regional Act was proposed and adopted. During the congressional debate in 1979,BPA forecast that the check for this year would be over$400 million. If BPA's proposal goes through, the f cost of the exchange would be forced down to approximately $35 million.This compares with the forecasted$256 million if the methodology remains unchanged. it III* The Average System Cost of a participating utility is now determined by 1 ~ BPA on the basis of a methodology developed in consultation with the Northwest Power Planning Council,BPA's customers,and the four state public utility commissions of the region.The methodology is subject to review and approval by FERC. E The consultation process for the current ASC methodology culminated in 1981.An implementing contract,the Residential Sale and Purchase Agreement,was developed simultaneously.That contract was considered l to be an integral part of the BPA implementation of the Regional Poi.cr f Act.Concurrently,new power sales contracts were developed for the DSIs and the publics and investor-owned utilities. In the development of the i ASC methodology,BP.A took the role of mediator to allow all parties full j participation.BPA maintained the role of arbitrator when disputes arose i between the other parties.The major BPA customer groups were actively involved in every step.The DSts and public power groups would at various times bring outside consultants directly into the process.Their ! experts were given open foram to present information. k All participants worked together toward the common goal of t implementing the residential exchange provisions of the RPA.Obviously, numerous areas of disagreement occurred in developing the f methodology.Compromises,however,were reached on all points.The i methodology was developed and parties understood it to be a package. k. Thus,the individual ASC elements are a result of interaction between parties as they attempted to reach agreement on an acceptable i methodology to fit into the exchange contract. l "Average System Cost" for any given utility is the computed results of many different cost components.Each component can be the subject of debate.The cornerstone of the methodology became an agreement to rely on the regulatory decisions made by the utilities'state commissions. This jurisdictional approach was selected to best reflect the Average System Cost incurred by a utility to serve its residential and small-farm customers.It also removed from BPA the ability to develop its own procedures to determine costs at a level not consistent with those already approved for a given company.The jurisdictional approach was not agreed to without substantial discussion.Once established,however,the remaining consultation was hindamentally a technical implementation of the concept of a jurisdictional approach,as modified by the requirements of the Regional Power Act.Numerous issues,such as how to treat surplus power sales,allocation of general office costs, fuel costs,and other issues were all resolved by the jurisdictional approach. The current methodology was submitted to FERC on August 27, 1981. FERC gave interim approval to the 1981 methodology on October 14, 1981,and on September 27;1983,the methodology received final FERC approval with an implementation date"of January 10, 1984. The methodology contains a specific mechanism for change.BPA's Administrator's record of decision on the original ASC methodology, signed by Peter Johnson on August 26, 1981,specifically outlines the criteria and procedures for changing the ASC methodology.Section IV(D) states: 'i "The proposed ASC methodology provides a method for changing the'methodology if BPA or the participants in the exchange find it does not function properly,to allow for changes in accounting procedures,or for changes in circumstances relating to the exchange.A consultation process similar to the one used to develop this proposal will be conducted in order to change the methodology.However, no effort to change the 8 methodology may begin prior to one year after FERC's approval 1 of any current methodology.'! currem BPA contends the current methodology does not work.The fact is the current methodology is working as envisioned.There are checks and balances at each step of the process.There are opportunities for review t WorkS Well and comment for all parties; first at the jurisdictional level;second during BPA's review process;and finally at the FERC approval process.As with any regulatory process,there will be disputes on complex issues.In cases where agreement cannot be reached,FERC has been assigned the responsibility of analyzing and resolving the issue.Currently these unresolved issues concerning BPA's allocation of cost are pending resolution before FERC.BPA is naive when it claims its new methodology will resolve these disagreements. The effect of these unresolved issues on changing average system cost is t small. For example,the adjustment by BPA to PGE's average system cost for alleged inclusion of the Pebble Springs Project represents less than four percent of PGE's overall average system cost in the first year,and less than one percent for the remaining nine years.BPA fails to state that over 95 percent of PGE's average system cost under the existing methodology € is correct and uncontested. BP.&'s proposal eliminates the checks and balances interwoven into the original methodology.The end result can only be more disagreement and i more confrontation.Clearly this is not in the public interest. ReconsulUtion BRA tried to start a"reconsultation process to revise the Average System Cost methodology on October 7, 1983,three months before it became final.The action was in response to requests by direct-service industrial ! customers. BPA listed 17 specific issues and asked for comments.The s' investor-owmed utilities made their position clear to BPA.On November,7, 1983,the utilities stated that the"reconsultation",as proposed by BPA, did not represent the agreed-upon process. In fact,it was nothing more than an attempt to impose unilateral changes in the methodology. During the comment period.,BPA received numerous suggestions from the direct-service industrial customers.All recommended major changes in the industries' favo.These changes would substantially reduce or t " — - ' - � - IN – completely eliminate exchange benefits for millions of residential , m p Y customers. Only BPA and the DSls are in favor of major changes to the methodology. BPP.did not follow the same negotiated framework under which the original methodology was developed.BPA is no longer amediator in the negotiation process between the parties.Instead,BPA is wa advocate of _ the DSls'position.BPA has not taken into account the public comments, nor has there been any real consultation among the parties.There was no open negotiation,no Joint State Board involvement,and no involvement by the Power Planning Council.All these steps are mandated in the Act. Where the original methodology was developed in cooperative negotiations,the new proposed methodology has been developed behind closed doors.This conflicts with Peter Johnson's own direction stated in his Administrative Decision. i On February 3, 1984,the investor-owned utilities received a copy of the Proposed New Federal Register Notice of BPA's proposed new methodology for 1 - determining Average System Cost. It essentiatly scraps the currentMethodology _ methodology,approved by FERC,and starts over with untested.. s assumptions and conclusions.In addition,BPA set only a 45-clay review period for written comments,and 30 days for additional responses to the comments.Such limited time for discussion and debate on these sweeping changes suggests a rush to judgment to achieve a predetermined end.Customers of only two investor-owned utilities and no publicly owned utilities will receive benefits under the Act if BPA's new methodology is adopted.This drastic change indicates BPA's y intention to drasticaliv cut the benefits and to ignore Congress' intent to create wholesale rate parity among Pacific Northwest customers. The following section reviews the BPA's proposed methodology and the rationale of each specific issue. Evaluation of the MAN The comerstone of the current methodology is the use of component $ Procosts of service allowed by state regulatory bodies,or"jurisdictional" NeW MLIthodologycosts.There was substantial negotiation on this issue.All parties agreed the jurisdictional cost approach was the z ppropriate representation of a company's cost bei it represents the current costs to customers.Therefore,the approach is consistent with the intent of Section 5(c)(i)of the Act stating that"Pacific Northwest electric utilities offer to sell electric power to the administrator at the Average system Cost of that utility's resources in each year". In addition,the use of jurisdictional costs was designed to avoid the possible arbitrary decisions by BPA if it retained sole authority to set costs.BPA becomes an equal to any other customer buying power from the utility.State commissions have neither the legal authority nor the political incentive to raise a utility's rates just so it can increase the exchange costs.To the contrary,the commissions have a responsibility to customers to keep rates as low as possible,while still maintaining the utility's financial integrity. Policies vary on what each state should include in a utility's costs of doing business.This includes decisions on fuel costs,operation and maintenance expenses,plant in-service,and return on stockholders' investments. In place of the jurisdictional approach,BPA wants to use information from the previouscalendar year's FERC Form I to develop the current year's Average System Cost.There are to be no adjustments to cost incurred during the previous year for unusual events,escalation,or other differences between costs in a previous year and the current year. incurred during the previous year for unusual events,escalation,or other differences between costs in a previous;year and the current year. 2. Costs specifically to be excluded under BPMs proposal. i a. Transmission l nes BPA wants to eliminate legitimate costs for transmitting electricity from power plants to customers.The first change would be to limit the amount of transmission costs to only the cost for j r transmission included in the BPA's preferred customer rate It is I presently about mills per kilowatt-hour..In addition,the proposal t arbitrarily excludes costs associated with the"radial"transmission E lines that feed distribution lines from long-distance transmission, lines. ! Transmission is an integral part of a resource.The location of a new power plant is evaluated on an economic basis to provide the overall lowest cost to the customer.EPA's proposal penalizes the customers of utilities with power plants located at great distances from their service areas,even though the:econonuc justification for the locations has been scrutinized by the utility's state regulators. b. Construction Work In Progress J A) ± Currently,some state regulatory bodies allow the inclusion of construction work in progress in rates.BPA wants to eliminate construction work in progress in the calculation of Average System Cost.BPA has chosen to exclude CWIP because it incorrectly believes some utilities rates include temunated plant costs. BPA's concerns are unfounded.If a plant is terminated,the cost is previously included in rate base and easily identified.FERC currently allows the inclusion of CWIP in rates. In fact,even BPA charges its current customers for CWIP in rates. t e. inclusion of Zeneration Resources Used to Produce Power to Meet Retail ids BPA plans to exclude the cost of power plants it believes are used to sell surplus power. It is unclear how BPA will make this determination.This r adjustment could have major effects on all investor-owned utilities. There is no way to know how BPA will administer this adjustment in light of the swings in power requirements from seasonal or weather differences and hydro variability,plant maintenance and outages,and reserve;standby requirements. d. ComervaMo a BPA wants to include only conservation costs in a company's Average System Cost consistent with its own conservation programs.Each of the investor-owned utilities has a substantial conservation program.But more have signed conservation contracts with BPA. Reasonable conservation costs,although approved by a utility's state commission and mandated by the Act as includable in ASC, could be disapproved,by BPA:BPA has not stated what its approval (� mechanism will be.This leaves it total unbridled discretion,puts °-- BPA in a position to circumvent the intent of the Act,or to force others in the region to sign up for uneconomic conservation programs. r; k -.-e......,. .;r. -....«. ... ..wrm-`.,a..te'cawre� .•---•.—••...ea•s:.'nd:d:'3Fit&4YF.r *' F' tgg Gy 1 - OR r 0. Return on Equity BPA has proposed that return on equity—the return on capital j reasonably necessary to induce sale of stock—be allowed in the determination of Average System Cost.To determine return on t' a national average of the amount equity,BPA wants to take ` 4 allowed by state,regulatory authorities and reduce that overall average by 1 percent.This 1 percent purportedly adjusts for what BPA perceives to be the cost included in the return on equity for terminated plants and other items that it is unable to identify. There is no substance to BP.A's theory.National averages do not reflect the risk of any one business and can only result in an incorrect allocation of cost.The 1 percent penalty cannot reasonably be substituted as a surrogate for the determination of { state commissions.In addition,the 1 percent reduction is inappropriate since terminated plant costs are allowed directly in ; rates in almost all jurisdictions other than Oregon and are not included in the allowed return on equity.; S. Fuel CoM From Affiliates Curiously,BPA proposes using the jurisdictional approach to determine certain fuel costs.Any fuel supplied by an affiliate to a at the lowest allowed jurisdictional cost. utility would be recorded Use of jurisdictionally allowed costs is certainly appropriate when all revenue requirements are consideredBut to take one item from a jurisdictional proceeding without inclusion of all factors can only lead to inconsistencies and incorrect allocations of total costs. p a . Income Taxes Under the new proposal,utilities can only include the g}ective income taxes paid by it in the prior year.The key word is"paid": his limitation precludes normalizing adjustments required by the Internal Revenue Service. BPA,in effect,is willing to take advantage of accelerated depreciation and investment tax credit to reduce a utility's income tax cost,but unwilling to acknowledge that these reductions are only available to a utility which is fully normalized.BPA wants to calculate income tax expenses differently than FERC,the state commissions,and the IRS. In addition,in review of BPA's proposed schedules,it appears BPA is looking only to select tax adjustments that work in its favor. h. inclusion of only cosu Directly Functionalixed BPA plans to remove'a method that allows for ASC costs that are of a general corporate nature for a utility with nonutility operations or that serves customers in more than one state. During the negotiations for the original methodology,every party realized that there were administrative and general expenses that are common to all aspects of a company's operation.The method now in use developed as a reasonable way to allocate these general expenses to average system cost. BPA is requesting utilities to set up additional internal budgeting systems to separate these costs.Though it can be done,many f detailed studies and reams of paper will show what years of regulatory practice have already evolved--that the current method is logical and reasonable. 1121 m If BPA's proposal is adopted,residential and farm customers will see their benefits cut by$221 million.With these changes,there will no longer be wholesale rate parity for all customers,as intended by Congress in the Regional Power Act:Based on the analysis of all investor-owned utilities in the Northwest.,'only Portland General Electric and Utah Power& Light would remain in the exchange,and even they could be forced out under punitive interpretations of the proposed adjustments. An examination of BPA's own rates,using its proposal, illustrates the absurdity:,and inconsistency of what it wants to do.BPA would have to cut its own rates by more than 50 percent.Yet BPA does not propose to develop its own rates consistent with its proposal.` s Impact of Of all costs BPA must consider in its rates,the residential exchange is E relatively small. The major contributors to BPA's costs are the WPPSS y RenegotlMlan of projects at more than$1 billion a year.Also, BPA has major financial Av �� commitments to fungi new transmission lines and the conservation programs of utilities that have not had them in the past. A reduction in on Bonneville'ses the net cost of the exchange from its current$256 million down to the $35 million proposed by BPA`will have a number of results.The most important is that it releases the direct-service industrial customers from their commitment to;pay for the cost of the residential exchange.In BPA's most recent rate case,the average system cost of exchanged power,based on the current methodology,was estimated to be 3 cents a kilowatt-hour. Although the direct-service industrial customers have volunteered to pay the full cost of the exchange through various rate manipulations,they have arranged to only pay 2.65 cents/kWh. If the DSIs"receive the benefits of this exchange reduction as forecasted in the rate case,their rate could fall as low as 2.4 cents/kWh. This corresponds with the 2.2 cents paid by other BPA preference customers. In spite of their promise to help bear the cost of the exchange, the r aluminum smelters will have gained new 20-year contracts with virtually no increase in cost over those borne by other BPA customers. i In the long term,the benefits to the DSIs are even more pronounced.A 1 very important component of BPA's directives in the Regional Power Act sets the rates for the RSIs after 1985. It is based on their rates from July l 1984 to July 1985.This rate floor is the minimum rate the DSis will pay over the following years.The proposed Average System Cost changes will dramatically reduce this rate floor from about 2.8 cents/kWh to about 2.4 cents/kWh. A 14 percent reduction in DSI rates will lower their rates by a total of$900 million during the remainder of the decades I; f I` 7 ' gig ERE __ 5_ r" Sharing low-cost power from federal dams among all homes and farms in the Northwest was a key principle in the Regional Power Act.This principle could be destroyed SUMMARY OF by changes the Bonneville Power Administration proposes 'm to make to the methodused to share the power.A new S PROPOSED regional spirit of cooperation to solve energy problems CHAINGES and meet future energy`needs will likely suffer as well. BPA wants to cut by more than half the benefits PCpE's TOAVERAGE home and farm customers receive under the Regional Power Acta The result would he a rate increase of as much SYSTEM COSTS as 38 percent. At the same time,BPA plans to do this in a way that ignores time limits and public participation requirements in the Regional Power Act. The Regional Power Act was the result of five years of intensive negotiations. Compromise among the major energy producers and users in the region was a key to its passage by Congress. Publicly owned utilities wanted to protect their rights to low-cost'federal power. Aluminum smelters needed new long-term power contracts with BPA. 'Their existing power contracts were about to expire and weren't going to be renewed. PGE and other investor-owned utilities wanted their customers to have equal access to the low-cost power from federal projects that had been built with taxpayer funds. Negotiation Negotiation led to a compromise acceptable to all three groups. Continued preferential access to federal power is and compromise now guaranteed for the public utilities. Aluminum smelters now have new long-term contracts. In turn, the smelters have given up some of their share of the power from the federal hydro projects and as a result are paying higher rates. Homes and farms served by investor-owned utilities can now receive the benefits of the low-cost hydropower that once had gone to the aluminum companies.This is handled through an "exchange agreement." BPA sells power to the investor-owned utilities, like PGE, at the:same low rate it sells power to public utilities. In tum, BPA buys power'from PGE at the _ average of all the Company's costs for generating and transmitting power; its "average system cost".The difference in cost is added to BPA's other rates, primarily the aluminum companies'. PGE's customers are credited directly for the savings and receive them dollar for dollar. There is no increase or change in the utility's profits. Now BPA wants to change the way it has agreed to determine .^ averagz: system costs. The end result: up to 38 percent higher rates for PGE's customers. Under the existing method of determining average system costs, homes and Emig farms throughout the Northwest can expect to save some $256 million in 1984-1985. These benefits will be cut to $35 million if BPA goes forward with its plans.To justify the changes, BPA claims the existingmethod costs its other customers too much. Surprisingly, however, the cost of the exchange during 1984 is only a fraction of the $400 million BPA said it expected to pay during Congressional hearings on the Act. Checks, and balances Consultation among everyone concerned was the foundation for developing the existing average system cost methodology. The cornerstone was an agreement to rely on decisions made by the regulatory commissionsin each Northwest state.This was agreed to because the states' decisions best reflect the utilities' cost of serving their customers. A system of checks and balances requiring review by state public utility commissions,BPA, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a review board from the four Northwest states and potentially the:courts, provides opportunities for adjustments and prevents any abuse of exchange agreements. Now BPA wants the . authority to arbitrarily set the price it pays for the electricity it buys under the exchange agreements. At the same time, BPA warts to keep the right to set its own price for selling electricity. BPA hopes to make its changes without regard to the time limits and the open discussion process it agreed to in the original contracts. In the BPA Administrator's decision on the original average system cost methodology. He states, No effort to change the methodology may begin prior to one year after FERC's approval of any current methodology." No e for discussion Contradicting its agreements, BPA wants to make its changes in the summer of 1984.By the riles already agreed to, the process should not even start until at least September 1984.And it should include detailed, open discussions among all interested groups and involve the Northwest Power Planning Council. All of these steps are called for in the Act. In its new schedule, BPA grants only 45 days to comment on its proposal and only 30 days to respond to comments by other parties. The hurried schedule appears'designed so BPA can have the changes in effect early this summer. Interestingly, BPA's changes come just in time for the start of an important rate period for the aluminum smelters. The Regional Act sets July 1, 1984 to July 1, 1985 as the time to set the"floor rate" for the smelters. Their rates from BPA can clever fall below this floor rate. Consequently, the smelters would pay about$900million less to BPA during the next decade if BPA's proposal goes into effect.But other customers, including the homes and farms served by PGE, would have to pay$900 million more. Unrealistic methods of determining costs are proposed by BPA in several areas. In' fact BPA plans to use a'double standard. If the federal agency were to apply similar standards to itself, it would have to lower its own rates by 54 percent. Clearly, BWs proposal violates the spirit and the intent of the Regional Power Act and many associated agreements. BPA must not be allowed to go through with its pians _ _ m BPA Administrator Deter Johnson is the proponent of these changes that would so dramatically affect the electric rates CALL TOACTION of each of us. But the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has final ,say over rates under the Regional Power Act. Members of Congress from the Northwest, many of whom worked hard to pass the Act, are interested and concerned about the effect of rates on each of us.Join Lis in urging these decision makers to conduct a complete, open and unbiased review of the effect of the proposed changesm Vim CITY OF TIGARD,'OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: PREVIOUS ACTION: Acceptance of Bond j ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Begin Maintenance and Sewer Compliance Agreement REQUESTED BY: Blaine Saftstorm (Contr) ' Period for HOODVIEW SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION and 'EngineeringsDepartment DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION'SUMMARY This was a 2 lot sewer extension which was extended from a line in Summerfield result of the Washington to lots 22 and 23 in Hoodview ,Subdivision. This was a; County Health Department requiring these lots to be hooked to a sewer system since their septic systems failed. The Contractor (Blaine Safstorm) , has requested that we hold his Performance' Bond as the one year Maintenance Bond. a-a:=saaaaaaaszasasaaa amaaasaaaaaaxasaaaasaaaaaaaaaaacraaaasaasaaasa.=-aa=saga--a-- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED r:=raaaaaas==aaaisa.:-aaaa=asaaaaaamasasaama=aaa rocsasaaa==a=sea-sasa=--==_ ----______ SUGGESTED ACTION The Engineering Department recommends that the City Council place this project onto its one year maintenance period. ri CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ,l COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: q ^© AGENDA ITEM #: r DATE SUBMITTED: 4 9.84- PREVIOUS ACTION Sanitary Sewer ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Acceptance Easements were accepted March 26, 1976 of 114th Place Subdivision REQUESTED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HEAD O CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY This project was built in 1971, but has never been accepted by resolution. All public improvements were installed at- the time of construction. The reason we had not requestedacceptance was that S.W.'Tigard Street had not been brought up to city standards until this winter.' ALTERNATIVES CONSIDER9D i SUGGESTED ACTION ;. The Engineering Department recommends and requests that the Council accept this project. CITY OF TIGARD,,'OREGON . t.. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 4/23/84 AGENDA ITEM #: /3r DATE SUBMITTED: 4/18/84 PREVIOUS ACTION: 4/9/84 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Council Approval WCCLS Library AgreementREQUESTED BY: Irene Ertell z DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY' ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY At its last City Council meeting, the Beaverton City Council` declined to approve the WCCLS Library `; Agreement. I : understand it is up for I reconsideration the week of April 23, 1984. The agreement which you approved April 9,; 1984 stated that approval of all cities 'would be by April` 18, 1984. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Remove Tigard approval and withdraw from WCCLS. 2. Ratify Tigard's approval of the WCCLS agreement with or without Beaverton's involvement. SUGGESTED ACTION #2. Pass,attached Resolution ratifying and extending Tigard's action from the April 9, 1984 meeting, with or without Beaverton's membership in WCCLS. (1467A) _. _ - " sa rsr a�as�w� CITY OF T3GARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 23, 1984 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: Fpril- 18, 1984 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Application REQUESTED BY Fee refund - Century 21 Homes - _ € DEPART .NT HEAD OK: 6` CITY ADMINISTRATOR: �. 4 — a INFORMATION SUMMARY. y e Century 21 Homes has requested a refund of its application fee for the Shadow plication was denied by the Planning Commission Park Subdivison. The original ap I in February. A new submittal was made in March with a revised plan. # _ Staff feels that a refund of the fee is not justified due to the cost incurred to process the request. We have expended staff time to write a new staff report. } In addition, costs have been incurred for an advertisement and notification of surrounding property owners. a t e , 4 t C.SeiZL•YCi'Rr========$a=CRC==53===L_.-== ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. The Council may grant the request and refund the fee of $585.00. . s 2. The Council may grant the request but modify the amount so that the applicant and City share the cost, $292.50 each. 3. The Council may deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request for a refund of the application fee for Century 21 Homes. _ - ENTER THE WORLD OF CENTURY 21 PROPERTIES April 13 1984 The City Council The City of Tigard Post Office Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Planning Department File No. S-10-83 Shadow Park Subdivision ° Gentlemen: The original application.on the above referenced subdivision was denied by action of the Planning Commission on February 7, 1984. ` We subsequently made a'second application on March 19, 1984. With both applications the appropriate fees were submitted totalling $1,193.00. We hereby request a refund of the second application fee in the amount of $585.00 because we do not believe the grounds on which the Planning Commission based their denial were fully addressed in either the pre-application conference or the staff report prior to the public hearing The Planning Commission denial was based on the determination that the street layout was not in conformance with the Tigard Compre- hensive Plan with regard to Ash Street. The street layout issue was first addressed at the public hearing. The Planning Commission members could have spoken to their concerns ' either by attaching further conditions to the staff's approval recommendation or by postponing the public hearing until we had adequately addressed them in our original application. In either case, we believe a second application and fee would have been un- (( necessary, , Your c nsideration is appreciated. Since •ely, M chael W. Fai P.E., P.L.S. General Manager CENTURY 21 HOMES North Coast Plaza o P.O.Box 1408 0 7160 S.W.Hazel Fem Rd. a Tualatin,OR 97062 0 (603)W-2762 mN_ 9 04M0 aDOW ENTER THE WORLD OF CENTURY 21 PROPERTIES { April 13, 1984 Keith Liden, Planner City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Your file No. S-10-83 Shadow Park Subdivision Dear Keith, You indicated in your note of 'March 21, 1984 that we could request a refund of the second application fee on Shadow Park by appearing r before the 'City Council `at either the March 26th or April -9th .. meetings. We missed the meeting on the 26th and forgot to request it at the meeting on the 9th. So that the next meeting does not go by with- out our having made the refund request, I've enclosed a letter, addressed to the City Council formally requesting the refund. Would you see that the letter is forwarded to the appropriate persons to be added to the agenda for the next Council meeting? Th k you. Sinc rely, Michael W. in, P. P.L.S. General Manager Century 21 Properties, Inc. MWF/km enclosure CENTURY 21 HOMES Narth Coast Plaza • P.O.Box 1408 • 7160 S.W.Hazel Fern Rd. • Tualatin,OR 97062 • (503)6£54-2762 � OdE—� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - AGENDA OF: AGENDA ITEM 4: DATE SUBMITTED: 4/13/84 PREVIOUS ACTION ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Accent Dedications and Easements on S W S 72nd T.m #21 REQUESTED"'BY: Public Works DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: } , INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are a cover letter and appropriate documents for the necessary right of way and easements for Ident #64 (Predelivery Service Corporation) on the 'S.W. >72nd Avenue LID x#21. j --szv=a=ca�sa=aaaszzmazzr-=szaaazasasssz=s=s====sss=s-=====ss==s=---as_ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED sasses=aa==s=zsazsassxassxxsaaaszsssa=seas=asasssss=========ssssssss=asn==s=s=s=.-s= SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends Council accept the dedication and easements. d HAAS %; V g5 Suite 445-AGC Center 9450S.W.Commerce Circle 6� a Wilsonville.Oregon 97070 (503)682-2450' { sedates, Inco \ 19 29) HZ Consufting Engineers&Surveyors April 10, 1984 Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E. Director of Public Works' City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard,`Oregon 97223 Dear Frank: Attached are 72nd Avenue related documents which we are providing for consideration by the Council . Ident. 64 (Predelivery Service Corporation) a. Street Dedication b. Easement for Utilities - With respect to Ident. 64, costs of the five (5) foot dedication and easement are calculated as follows: Street Dedication 2,887.5 ft.2 @ $2.25 = $6,496.88 Easement for Utilities 1.00 Total $6,497.88 This compares with an amount of $14,275.00 a.praised for the prior taking. Please draft a check in the amount of $6,497.88 to Predelivery Service Corporation. s Sincerely, MARL1 DE HAAS, P.E. MJD/slc Attachments cc: Ident. 64 9MR liff _ .. ,. _ _ -- STREET DEDICATION Ident. No. 64 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Predelivery Service Coporation, a Delaware Corporation hereinafter called grantor(s), for the sum of $6,496.88 grant and dedicate to the Public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along and within the following,described real property in Washington County, Oregon: See Exhibit "A" Attached � t To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the owner(s) in fee simple and have good and'legal right to grant their rights above-described. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) have hereunto set their hand and seals this .. 6 'day of 'December X983i c— (SEAL) (SEAL) ice- re en (SEAL) —(SEAL) IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned corporation has caused this Street Dedication to be executed by its duly authorized, undersigned officers. fi { pr�e�;ver Service Corporation _ Name of Co ation By Pres en loil;hC _cc.ary Dh S ecar STATE OF Michigan ) ) COUNTY OF Wayne ) On this 6th day of December , l9 8,L, personally appeared the above named and Acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before i�ublAcz, RETTF. :''roRTHNotaryary " My Commission expires: Notary Pubti: IQ'6 ounty,�' ` ApPt'e is da —. — g Approved as to legal description. thisT-._. ay of s 19 Accepted by the City;Council thisay By: �� J ity Recorder - City of Tigard .j Right-of-way Acquisition Description Exhibit "A { Ident. 'No. 64 Page 1 of 2 - A parcel of land in the East 3� of the East 1� of Section 12, T.2S, ,R.1W. , W M. , the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Being that portion of the tract of land described in Book 886, Page 580 of Washington County, Oregon Records (T.L. 3800, flap 2S-1-12A) which falls' between a centerline and a line 25 feet easterly at right angles and parallel to said center line, said center line described as follows: Beginning at a point that is N 89038'24" E, 20.00 feet from the recognized East 1/16th corner on the South line of said Section 12 ;(the southwest corner of the East a of the southeast 4 of said Section 12) noted as Point No. 289 on County Survey No. 19,127; thence along a center line N 0021'36" W, 2646.33 feet to a `point that is' N 89040'44" E, 20.00 feet from an iron pipe with a brass cap inside at the recognized 1/16th corner (the northwest corner of the East 32 of the southeast Q of said Section 12) noted as Point "P" on County Survey No. 13,247; thence continuing along said center line N 0016'56" 41, 2627.25 feet to a. point at the end of said center line that is N 89043'04" E, 20.00 feet from a stone at the recognized 1/16th corner (the northwest corner of the East �2 of the northeast 4 of said Section 12) noted as Point "B" on County Survey No. 13,247. 12/10/82 80.194,11$ I 3.,•.�:..•, >-tsa-.«. .,-a:w,,. ah....�. aGe .:s,�:,.,„w a--sem x zh..wa ws•. ate.. +.sca+r Mr:nrraa. .;,,a.s».:a • .e. � ria. # - _ a., ,,��' 4 gra �* 5''`m. �' ,�s'tt 'p"'.. r'• r:S� ,�3y °��"x4' �s.m�� ,..__ �u.#i �.,� . �,� "„ a8 «` �St=t�' -s 3y � �''. z x �}�,"k. '+, �i.w.r.• i `�� Ttt'� . �- �� - r ar id ��, r• 1•-I • ':I. : :1 'i. °�-�.s �,r ��.,`"�5:ne`f.�: `��u Uzi sy. Fa .F •. I• • �3"�.Sgr�t`�-��f$`^ .r�t�d'`�as' e' IV SM y��xS t" ". Pi"`Cy kFte�'fi"1'•� Ye.��^'-�-ri9�� c�..�¢'.�k'�.^`X�' �� •• lief-'?k}`Y`I��T a'�r"s�'-��%�n<f1��, z�� „��.. r#fit sS_: • � +px,��,'�-w� ��xt��,. �F� �Js��;�^v.�1 5�"y r'., # •• . ' �r��.t� ��i�`��'�i��You. k ri,. ,,�` - •. 5Y 3- • •1•I . : ' : 1 1 1 G�GY �<Lt�i},y�i' ib3^sl }.��'h�n K,�ck'T l f �'�vR'.x ,•,��.,c .r.+rA..?k_��.:.;4L�?[rta.. K-ri:Yh.'.S`�,xk��'}-c.'.''e�ay.�.:1.�'�'�;` er.*s�s��'S�-.�.`` v�.�:� 1'4�.x�.i:� ��•?>.}..-a� �� 1._P Uigm Project: 72nd Avenue Area - LID No. 21 Assessment Ident. No. : 64 " Tax Lot No.: 3800 Tax Map No.: 2S-1-12A Deed Reference: Book 886, 'Page 580 EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES Predelivery Service Corporation R KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That a Delaware Corporation of the County of State of in Consideration of the sum of $1.00 (One Dollar) to them in hand paid, do 'hereby grant and convey unto the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oregon, F a right-of-way and easement over, across and under the following described real property situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, to-wit: PERMANENT EASEMENT DESCRIPTION SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED a i This permanent easement is granted for the`purpose of laying, constructing, $. replacing, and maintaining utility lines, and the easement herein granted i shall include the right for the Grantee to go over, across and under said ° land for the purpose of installing said utility lines and maintaining and repairing them, but reserving to the grantors the title to the lands, subject to the easement, and the right to make such use thereof, except to construct buildings, as mill not interfere with the uses and purposes of the easement. Page 1 is Utility Easement € t e0 - WITIMS..Maw— TEMPORARY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NONE f irp E of c This temporary easement' is ranted solely fortteesemenpt t e' Saidotemporaryg } utilities within the above3p. days from the date of certifi- easement shall cease to exist Thirty ( ) cation of completion of the project by the Engineer. + +h Grantee that they will not in any manner interefere Grantors covenant ,.o and with with or restrict, except as herein stated, Grantee's use of said easement. that This right-of-way and easement isugranted rsuantheretowittwil h he tbersoadonedestndingas to any work done by the City of Tigard,p leave the premises here described in condition reasonably similar to the previous state thereof when any work is finished thereon. P TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE Herein described right-of-way and easement unto 0 the City of Tigard, its successors and assigns, r. In the event that it becomes necessary for any person now or hereafter a party to the benefits and/or obligations of this easement to institute ailing action or suit to enforce any of tan heir rights hereunder, the party p memesu such action suit hcourt may adjudge reasonablehall be entitled to recover sas attorney'scost and sfeese- nts and such spar as the e appeal thereon. to be allowed in said action or suit or any app Page 2 llti l i ty Easement = =" The grantors do hereby warrant that they are the ownersin fee simple and have the right to grant the above' described easements. 4 WI ESS our ds and seals this 6 Day of December 19 83 We- res e (SEAL) _ (SEAL) ( � (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) For a consideration, the mortgage lien on the above described properties' is hereby;made subordinate to the easements above granted. Dated this day of 1g NONE Mortgagee By Title - (INDIVIDUAL} STATE OF Michigan ) ) County of Wayne } ss. BE IT REMEMBERED That on this 6th day of December 1983 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the above named J. W. Baughman and who are known to me to be the identical individuals described in and who executed the above instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year last above written. Notary ic .. o�rrH Nowry Public, Wayne County, Mich My corrani 55 i on expires ft Ocar�p ASIoll LNplra Supt.2, 1�4 5, Page 3 • Utility Easement w �.� s Nam SCORPORATE) STATE OF Michigan ) ss. County of Wayne ) On this 6th day of December , '19 83 before me appeared L. J. Graziano and - D. R. Jolliff e both to me personally known, who being duly sworn, did say that he, the said T. :T Graziano i c the President, and he, the said D R. Jolliffe is the Secretary of Predelivery Service Corporation, the within flamed Corporations and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and T— .-� �iat�e _ and D. R. Jolliffe acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year last above written. Not ry Pu .c o Stat9Vof ._e igan County of Wayne Ply Commission Expires: Sept. 2, 1984_ Rage Utility Easement ACCEPTANCE ccepts the foregoing grants and agrees to The City above named hereby a comply with each and every term and condition thereof. CITY OF TIGARD By: � �� _ Xity P Yi+ �.Byecorder STATE OF OREGON } ss_ County of Washington) On this�3"Jday of ,-� before me appeared 19 f rsn C c��V to. and r i JL e �Sor. both to me personally known who, being duly sworn, did say that he, the said is the Mayor, and he, the said Lorimer, is them corder of the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation, and the said 1L. and o Lo„,% acknowledged the said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation. IN TESTI14ONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year last above written. s-', � f 7GC�hiLj2,c� _ otary Public for State of Ore on My Commission Expires: 7- �S' ' Page 5 Utility Easement Utii•i-ties Easement •Description Exhibit "A" Ident: No: 64 Page 1 of 2 A `parcel of land in the East -4�'of the East k of Section 12, T.2S, R.1W. , W.M. , the Cityof Tigard,` Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Being that portion of the tract of land described in Book 886, Page 580 of the Washington County, Oregon ;Records (T.L. 3800, Map 2S-1-12A) which falls between aline 25 feet easterly at right angles and parallel to a center`line and a line 30 feet easterly at right angles and:parallel to said 'center line, said center line described as follows: Beginning at a point that is N 89038'24 E, 20.00 feet from the recognized East 1/16th corner on the South line of said Section 12 (the southwest corner of the East a of the southeast ;' of said Section 12) noted as Point No. 289 on County Survey:No. 19,127; thence along said center line N 0021'36" W, 2646.33 feet to a point that is N'89040'44" E, 20.00 feet from an iron pipe;,with 'a brass cap inside at the recognized 1/16th corner (the northwest corner of the East z of the southeast ; of said Section 12) noted as Point "P" on County Survey No. 13,247; thence continuing along said center line N 0016'56" W, 2627.25 feet to a point at the end of- said center line that is N 89043'04" E, 20.00 feet from a stone at the recognized 1/16th corner (the northwest corner of the East . of the northeast 4 of said Section 12) noted as Point "B" on County Survey No. 13,2.47. 12/10/82 80.194.118 z . .��, eF - ,,,�,.-.� ��.. � �� • 3,. � ��,� � rim �t;�s "cu. "a� �` ,� 4� � ^�$e '�� ,y„� s"a.,. .:. �-•.��: S.a,�:.�, '*r��.",§ `r ��``�• �'� "��$4 � C -yam .��a. ,y • _�' P �"El` '� � ��`•'` y � s ., .`�+. rt' a r y fin-' ��= � c ,. •rt `� > €7 •• yrs". �'�� V-0 2: � � iii • .. • - • � +� -L�� " §��-f.'r � � `iia# 3�'•�-rt:��`r„Hv' r'�t i'�`"'� �""��,�„�,}_ •. •. • '• �� ' y�` .,�1`��'S'�r��-tet �71. � � r MOM Ra _rrm t # 4 x _�__.-�,r� ,d._'� '�>t:•".�:Y� -� "�t, ��:rr��,r ...r.� �w�.E��,.� -��r.�,�'ss �,�.�,_�K_,.�.��?��