The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 11/14/1983 - TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an q. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate NOVEMBER 14, 1983, 7:30 Y.M. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, w FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH ask to be recognized by ,the Chair at the start 10865 SW 'WALNUT of that_agenda item. Visitor's agenda items are - TIGARD, OREGON 97223 asked to be kept to 2 minutes ,or less; longer matters can be set for a- future Agenda by con- tacting`either the 'Mayor or City Administrator. I. REGULAR MEETING: ` 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less, Please) 3. APPROVE STREET VACATION REQUEST - 67th & Gonzaga Street Public Hearing Opened Summation by City Recorder Public Testimony:_ Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination Public Hearing Closed -Consideration by Council & Action - Ordinance No. 83- 4. APPROVE PLAT VACATION REQUEST - Gulfside Estates Public Hearing`Opened Summation by City Recorder Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents', Cross Examination Public Hearing `Closed: Consideration by Council & Action` - Ordinance No. 83- 5. BUSINESS TAX REVISIONS DISCUSSION Finance Director 6. AUDIT REPORT Finance Director 7. BUDGET COMMITTEE WORKSHOP 7.1 Capital Improvements Program Report (CIP) 7.2 Five Year Plan Report 7.3 Tax Base/G.O. Bond Discussion 7.4 Open Workshop 8. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 8.1 Approve Council Minutes 10/27/83 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10. ADJOURNMENT (DH:lw/O316A) PAGE 1 - COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 14, 1983 S T I A R D C „I T Y C O`U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 14, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: President Kenneth Scheckla`; Councilors: Tom Brian, John Cook, and Ima Scott. City Staff: Frank Currie, Director of Public Works; Doris Hartig, City Recorder; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Director of Planning & Development; Tim Ramis, Legal- Counsel; and Jerri Widner, Finance Director. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS The following items were added: o Accept bid on S.W. 115th o Revision of Policy 11.4.2 o Library Civic Center Vote Report 2.1; S.W. TIGARD AVENUE/115TH STREET BID OPENING o Baker Rock $174,526.60 o Cascade Construction - 265,071.00 o Fabricators, Inc. 257,344.75 o C.G. Gredvig, Inc. 157,537.69 o K.F. Jacobson o K & G Construction 194,070.77 o Lanter Bros. Const. o Ken Leahy218,720.05 o M.B.E. Const. o Oregon Asphaltic 185,841.79 o Parker-Northwest 194,175.35 o Parsons Excay. 193,711.60 o Porter-Yeti Co. 170,075.90 o Rutan Construction 170,274.15 o Sproul Excay. a. Director of Public Works recommended City accept low bid of $157,537.69. b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian, to accept bid of C.G. Gredvig, Inc. of $157,53769. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 2.2 REVISIONS TO POLICY 11.4.2 E a. Planning Director requested clarification of the intent to the triangle policy. He explained the old policy and how staff is interpreting it. He noted the revised language and requested Council direction. Jim Miller gave further explanation of the rational regarding the proposed language, noting that it would allow development with the revised policy and preserves the center area for development of S.W. Dartmouth property. Council and staff discussed the policy and suggested revisions. PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 14, 1983 b: Motion ;by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott, to adopt A, Policy 11.4.2 with amendments as follows: L (a) Lie south of Hampton Street and have road access ' built to Comprehensive Plan road standards. (b) Have ` direct access to Pacific Highway, Highway 217, or Interstate 5 Freeway and by being less than''1000' from the right-of-way line of Pacific Highway or the interchange ramps of Highway 217 or Interstate 5'Freeway. (c) Have access within 300' of Atlanta Street, '68th Avenue, or Hampton Street by an access road built to Comprehensive ,Plan road standards. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 23 LIBRARY CIVIC CENTER VOTE REPORT o City Recorder read letter from Mayor Bishop suggesting Council discuss a plan on rental of City facilities on November 21, 1983. ; 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA o Pat Biggs, 8787 S.W. Mt. View Lane, representing Right< to Vote Committee requested Council to reason together and solve space needs. o Bob Wyffels, 8995 S.W. Edgewood .St., spoke to the City's problems and stated the goals for the City ,and citizens were not the same. He challenged Council to make; peace now. 4. STREET VACATION REQUEST - 67th & Gonzaga Street a. Public Hearing Opened. o Staff reported legal requirements had been met and recommended Council consider the item. Proponents: o Geraldine L. Ball, representing herself and DJB Inc., 11515 S.W. 91st, Tigard, stated she was for the vacation but noted Washington County's maps show the property under consideration to be one-half in City and one-half in County. o Staff responded County maps were inaccurate and that the area had been annexed to the City. b. Public Hearing Closed. C. ORDINANCE No. 83-53 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF SW 67TH AVENUE AND SW GONZAGA STREET, A DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. d. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook, to adopt. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. PAGE 2 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 14, 1983 { 5. PLAT VACATION REQUEST - Gulfside Estates ` a. Public Hearing Opened. o Staff reported legal requirements had been met and recommended Council consider the item. Proponents: o William Cox, . representing Robert Randall Co., 9500 SW Barbur, Portland,: stated he was available to answer Council questions. b. Public Hearing Closed. C. ORDINANCE NO. 83-54 AN ORDINANCE VACATING LOTS 1 THROUGH 15 OF GULFSIDE ESTATES, A PLAT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. d. : Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by ;Councilor Brian to adopt. { Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. b. BUSINESS TAX REVISIONS DISCUSSION a. Finance Director reviewed her memo to Council giving an analysis of alternatives to business tax rates and the resulting adjustments- of revenues. o Council and staff 'discussed the report and if the same "tax :rate should be applied to inside and/or outside city businesses, basing tax on number of employees and how to certify the number of employees. o Consensus of Council was to revise the tax to have the same rate for businesses inside and out of the city. b. Motion by Councilor;Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian, to have staff prepare an ordinance based on alternative four with Council comments made on the number of employees to equal full-time equivalent employees, that a certification of the number of employees be required and that a penalty be attached if reported incorrectly; the effective date to be worked out by staff to occur at the end of a billing cycle. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. o Staff todistributeinformation regarding the revised rates through the City newsletter and Chamber of Commerce. f PAGE 3 COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER TSS, 1983 7. AUDIT REPORT - a. Finance Director introduced John Detman and Paul Douthit of Coopers & , Lybrand, who reviewed , with Council the highlights of the audit e report. Paul Douthit noted the City had received a clean opinion on their accounting affairs. He stated the City has kept upgrading its accounting and reporting system and kept pace with the changes. The changes in accounting was noted in , the ,audit report, calling attention specifically to the Fiduciary Fund- Type for the employees pension trust and that the vacation payout was now shown in the general long terns debt. He also addressed the special assessment E accounting entries and noted this was a change from previous years. 6 o .John Detman reviewed the management letter and recommendations to improve the system. He spoke to the interest rate discrepancy between bancroft bonds and assessments receivable. He suggested the City consider advance refunding, depending on the bond market. He g continued by reviewing each recommendation„_noting the City <should consider upgrading the accounting and reporting system that would give the most benefits for the least cost. b. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott, to accept audit report. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCIL RECESSED AT 9:20 P.M. COUNCILOR SCOTT'LEFT COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 9:38 FOR BUDGET COMMITTEE WORKSHOP Present: President of Council Kenneth Scheckla; Councilors Brian and Cook; Budget Committee Members, Howard Duffy, Dale Evans, Wally Hoffman and Jim Smith. a. City Administrator stated the purpose of the workshop was to give the Committee a view of the City's financial status through the C.I.P. and 5-Year Financial Plan. He noted the Committee will have to determine what kind of corrective action will be necessary to continue police and other programs. He recommended the committee study the reports so they will be able by January 14th to make some recommendations on the items discussed tonight. City Administrator reviewed the report pointing out highlights and projections. o Howard.. Duffy questioned if the Committee should set goals and guidelines for spending before prioritizing projects. He also requested comparisons for prior years to see the history of special funds. o City Administrator responded it is a good suggestion and staff will supply information. He called attention to the financing of the street program and suggested the committee consider how to fund this .. expense. PAGE 4 — COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 14, 1983 o Consensus of Committee was to read the report and be prepared to make " recommendations. Councilor Brian stated he would like to ;review the recommendation for increasing fees and charges especially as it relates to new housing. o City Administrator explained graphs showing comparison of 'services to Population growth and the per capita operating budget expenditures. He referred to the report noting in the revenue summary for 84-85 a ax base of $1,300,000 to equal $1.55/$1000 would be needed to balance the budget. He also discussed the W.C.C.L.S. Levy and � recoxmnended a position the City should take. "." "o City Administrator summarized the report and requested how the Committee wished to proceed. = He suggested City staff prepare ,their budgets one based on Level III Service and one without the $400,000 new taxes and let the Budget Committee fill in their recommendations. o Councilor Brian suggested a prioritization of positions by departments, identifying which positions are general fund supported. o .Consensus of Council was to schedule meeting. date . after' Wednesday, j. November 16th Workshop. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:15 P.M. City 0ecorder Ci y of Ti rd " t � . ATTEST: _ . Mayor - City of Tigard t (DH:pm/0157A) l PAGE 5 COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 14, 1983 TiMES LISHI COMPANY Legal ' P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice 7-6262 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075' Legal Notice Advertising ® ❑`Tearsheet Notice City of Tigard 0 PO Box 23397 ® ❑'Duplicate Affidavit Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ass. 1, S1>san-Pinkle,r being first duly sworn,'depose and say that t am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk,of the Tigard Times Y,. a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 183.010 and 193.020;published at_' Tigard in the aforesaid county and state;that the - Tega1 No+—ice "'notion a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 successive and consecutive in the following issues: NoyP--mb r In, 1983 Subscribedartd s or to before me this er JU, 3983 :r Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: 3/16/87 AFFIDAVIT ta��it x 5� vr� Ali en"u Ti` Reo 1 "' 1f3YYL>S�59Y �LS �ii.&��4��i1]f¢4iY l"..e'biuLY 3 ,f p 'i¢Y✓`,9�f1p��ak�T$7�`l�fJ��4�{�Rf!',�gk"<y5�'tN?�.•diS�.°e.�3C53't r � � � } F i TIGARD BUDGET COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 16, 1983, 7:30 P.M. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH 10865 SW WALNUT TIGARD, OREGON ,97223 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call i 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 2. STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP Dr. Sheldon Edner gg i 3. ADJOURNMENT e 15 RAM i >E IMI . ,a R r *' f d a x �+ r 1I� wv s ,r. 9M, ,.,,.�., ,.. ,"",,a ."a "ro-a, -, _..K rs `,`zy r�'�" _ [�- cn va °° 5 _ .:Er mlr. � .-a �s M. �.n� � ,.". .� .:.t:.x ...-. ."�i.-.r1x�< .x,� ,t.. e„7 '�. � t} •�'� R`�.y Y: #ts�' „H' *7 iT'y'�.e+.nyt ��ss' '`.a� � ,syr:- .8,y v`• a{r 3" �,.r�.�.��t, s��.�arbFrrF,�x�+..�-��a r�u�r...rr.;�.r' a,.:�-��a,� ��_�.-,r �_�a '�:?�.�� s'�-z;��*�2- •rte=�..' .a :�„��.� '�� 5�+±s� �t-�.`-�b�.Ye�:� �.,,�..�3��` Date 11/14/8:3 I wish to testify before the Tigard`City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: AGENDA ITEM # -� STREET 31AGATION 67thl & Gonz a ?roponent (for) Opponent (against) game, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation tj . Y/3 j it t i Date 11/14/83 { I `wish to testify before` the'Tgard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 'AGENDA ITEM # 4 PLAT UACATIOI4,.--'GULFSIDE ESTATES Proponent (for) opponent (against) , Jame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation a � -RIC, IF MIRM — _ ks b �v CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 11/14/83 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: 11/10/83 PREVIOUS ACTION: Publ-i cHp-tri no- St--t. ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Street Vacation'' for 1.1/14/83 Request - 67th & GonzagaREQUESTED BY: PropertV Viers DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY The vacation petition with adequate signatures was filed with the City Recorder 9/16/83 and Council,by Resolution No. 83-98 set public hearing for 11/14/83. Notices have been published and posted as required by ,ORS 271.110. The required fees to cover costs`have been deposited. The proposed`ordinance would vacate' all the area except as provided in Section 6 under conditions and reservations. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the request. 2. Deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the ordinance granting the vacation subject to conditions and reservations. r ' t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 11/14/83 AGENDA ITEM 4: 4 DATE SUBMITTED: 11/10/88 PREVIOUS ACTION: - Public Hearing Set ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Plat Vacation - For 11/14/83 Gulf Side Estates REQUESTED BY: Property Owners DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY The vacation petition with adequate signatures was filed with the City Recorder 9/16/83 and Council by Resolution.No.'83-91' set a public hearing for 11/14/83.` Notices have been,published and posted as required by ORS 271.110. The required fees to cover costs have been deposited. The proposed ordinance would vacate ' Gulf .Side Estates lots 1 through 15. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the request. 2. Deny request. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt ordinance granting the •vacation. 1 , r M E M 0 `R A N D U id 4 DATE: September 30, 1983 TO Mayor and .City Council' FROM: Jerri L. Widner, Finance Director ' SUBJECT: BUSINESS TAX REPORT UPDATE Background: The Budget Committee established a goal to meet $25,000 for administrative costs plus $100,000 to be designated for police from business tax revenues. The budgeted revenue for 1983-84 is $78,000. Analysis: Number Present Revenue b Rate' Projected Present: Small (outside/itinerant) 350 $100 $35,000 . (0-10 employees) Small (inside/City) 442 "50 22,100 (0-10 employees) Medium (inside/City) 442 50 22,100 (11-50 employees) Large (inside/City) 66 50 3,300 (5I+ employees) _ Total 1,300 $82,500 Alternative ,F1: Flat Rate at $50.00 Small (outside/itinerant) 350 $ 50 $17,500 (0-10 employees) Small (inside/City) 442' 50 22,100 (0-10 employees) Medium (inside/City) 442' 50 22,100 (11-50 employees) Large (inside/City) 66 50 3,300 (51+ employees) Total 1,300 $65,000 Budget Estimate 83-84 (78,000) Revenue Deficit 83-E4 13,000) � i _ Number Present Revenue Rate Projected : Alternative #2: ' Variable Rate Small (outside/itinerant) 350 $ 35 $12,250 (0-10 employees) 15,470 Small (inside/City) 442 35 (0-10 employees) j Medium (inside/City) 442 125 55,250 (11-50 employees) Large (inside/City) 66 25U 16,500 (51+ employees) $99,470 Total 1,300 I Budget Estimate 83-84 (78,000) Revenue Increase 83-84 21,470 Alternative X63: Variable Rate(Base + Tax) $14,000 Small (outside/itinerant) 350 $40 (0-10 employees) $20+20(@$2/empl) 40 :' ` Small (inside/City) 442 $20+20(@$2/empl) 17,680 (0-10 employees) �s42 20+2 53,040 Medium (inside/City) ; $22+7.00(@$2/empl) 120 (11-50 employees) 66 220 14,520 _ Large (inside/City)' $20+200(@$2/empl') (51¢ employees) 1,300 $98,940 Total (73,000) Budget Estimate 83-84 20,940 Revenue Increase 83-84 Alternative #4: Variable Rate/Councilor Tom Brian $14,000 Small (outside/itinerant) 350 $ 40 (0-10 employees) 17,680 Small (inside/City) 442 40 (0-10 employees) 442 75 33,150 Medium (inside/City) (11-50 employees) 66 15U 9,900 Large (inside/City) (51+ employees) $74,730 Total 1,300 Budget Estimate 83-84 (78,000) Revenue Deficit 83-84 3,270) Summary: The alternatives suggested by Council are listed above, you may choose to 1. do nothing 2. select another alternative rate schedule JLw:ms(0089F) No. 5058 ". ...LICENSE' v 112420 S.W.MAIN ST. P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD, OR 97223 SCHEDULE: A P 'S EDPCrRSUANTTb-APPLICATION ANDS J EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/84 NDER:tPE TERMS:AND CONDITIONS OC LICENSE,OORDINANCES-OF HE-;ITN OF• JIGARD MAY BE REVOKED 6r THE CITI RCGie3DER. ANNUAL FEE: S0.00. TYPE OF BUSINESS:` BUSINESS PHONE: 63�-20C)1 . BOWLING, R1~C;REATION NAME: OWNER'S NAME: TIGARD"BOWL, INC. MARION J. IN ROBERT D. POWER ADDRESS: 1 IC60 SW- PACIFIC:_HIGHWAY OWNER'S ADDRESS: i (if different from business) I TIGARD OR 97223 r^.E•CE11:`T` THIS LPCEWSBBAUST'BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE AT THE BUSINESS ADDRESS. NOT TRANSFERABLE. t- E. `i. r ' EXPIRATION DATE: 66/37/84 LICENSE NO.: SOW � CORRECT SIGN.HERE' ANNUAL FEE' 50.00 ;.I �d SCHEDULE: A s TY F�B�(�I (.�p�°IN h+q� t•��,n PHONE NO.: 639-2001 3 GNATURE OF BUSIN€ySS...REPRESENTATIV DATE L�MI..IN8. RCiREA tTION ��NNEE��gg S w BUIGA(dL) INC. I BUSINESS ADDRESS: 116E+43 EM PACIFIC HIGHWAY s { ,slNEss NAME PHONE NO. OWNER'S NkME: TIGARD OR 97223 MARION .7. &c ROBERT D. POWERS i ]DRESS OWNER'S ADDRESS: (If different from business) �,TURE OF BUSINESS GNATURE OF BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE DATE CONTRACTORS: You must shown proof of Oregon State Contractor's License number E. E I { I , c if 1,25 -(IV 93 V --- CA"'"'`� f ONE �a__ [AVE :, n1BETTER , COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL WIRING �£^ HORTON ELECTRIC ...Electrically Phone: 659-8448 or 654.6286 11226 S.E.Twenty-first Street '�ep `�3 1 96.3 Milwaukie, Oregon 97222rI Sept. 21, 1983 y,�� City of Tigard F.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 In regard to new fee for renewal of business License I notice an increase in fee from 1983 of $60.00 to 1984 of $100.,00. This seems to be an exorbitant increase at a time when the small contractors are having increased pro- blems staying in business.. This, coupled with having to have a license for each of a>number of sma.11 cities is making an unusualhardship on a business such as ours. Because we may do only a couple of jobs, if any, I shall not renew my license until I get a job in,your city, therefore I am returning application. Yours tru7,ye I0. d. HCR.T ON k COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL WIRING �& nIBETTER �---- ELECTRIC Eiectfica/iy F Phone: 659-8448 or 654-6286 +` 11226 S.E. Twenty-first Street' Milwaukie,Oregon 97222 11 CENSE FEES City of Gladstone $ 27'0' 00 34 fir Q Beaverton .00 It ,r Milwaukie 29000 It :, Portland 611.90 TM Oregon City 145.00 Gresham 25.00 x TM TM' 'Canby. 25000 . 1 j i i t 1 •-a.)+•per,- tt 2 h-. F CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON REPORT TO MANAGEMENT for the year ended June 30, 1983 �z ! 19 8 7s� Erle q�+ =Ems i p f 4 CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON i Nil illo i a i ,,3 Honorable. Mayor' and council Members City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon We believe our responsibility as your independent cer- tified public accountants includes assisting you to continually evaluate the City's accounting, budgetary, and internal control systems. As part of our annual audit,, we have the opportunity to review City operations and inform you of areas susceptible to improvement. The recommendations included in this report result from observations made during our examination of your combined 1983 financial statements. We believe implementation of these 'recom- mendations will be both cost effective and beneficial to your y. accounting systems and related financial reporting. - We wish to express our appreciation to all City employees for their courtesy and cooperation throughout the audit. We have reviewed the comments with Mr. Bob .Jean, City Administrator, Ms. Berri Widner, Director of Finance, and Mrs. Doris Hartig, City Recorder. We will be pleased to discuss our findings and recommendations further with you or to assist in their implementation. Very truly yours, IQOPERSuq.`'(J1 Cci 1t: G ^.� .li .wedwosal .. "O/ ,James L. Savage, a partner {----------------- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Improve Special Assessment Fund Accounting 1 Minimize Interest Rate Discrepancy Between Bancroft Improvement Bond Obligations and Assessments Receivable 2 Develop and Implement a Policy for Delinquent Assessments Receivable 3 Improve Interim Financial Reporting Information 4 Modify Cash Accounting Procedures 5 Continue to Develop a WrittenAccounting Policies and Procedures Manual 6-7 Status of Prior Year Comments g r I r Improve Special Assessment F"nd 'Accounting. E' Activity in the Special Assessment Fund continues to increase significantly. The growth of the City has required a E commensurate number of Local Improvement Districts. This increasing activity continues to generate additional accounting and reporting workload, both in historic accounting for and documentation of ', additional assessments, As a result, our audit work has resulted in several corrections and adjustments to the detail records. We recommend you continue to evaluate and review both the accounting procedures involved in the Special Assessment Fund as well as the workload and work distribution in the Finance Department. Allocation of workload is critical since the volume, of Special Assessment Fund transactions continuesto grow and . places severe time constraints on your staff. If activity in this Fund continues as expected, consideration should be given V to modifying the computer software currently being utilized. We ` understand the Accounting Information Management Study Committee has included Special Assessment Fund accounting on'its "agenda- x J Minimize Interest Rate Discrepancy Between Bancroft Improvement Bond obligations and .Assessments Receivable. During, the year we noted Bancroft improvement bonds issued with interest rates as high as 16.75`. Over $2,014,000 in such bonds (plus interest of $1,369,000) are outstanding with interest rates of 9% or more. The related assessments' receivable from property owners carry interest rates no higher than 10;x, with the majority of` assessments at 9.09%. In effect, the .City is subsidizing the assessments by the amount of the interest rate` differential. As the obligation repayment exceeds cash collected, the City will have to fund the difference. we recommend you monitor interest rates on Bancroft improvement bonds payable and the related assessments receivable from property owners, and minimize the rate ' discrepancy between them. Future assessments receivable should be at a rate suffi- cient to uffi-cient 'to fund the related cost of debt. 2 -' Develop and Implement a Policy for Delinquent Assessments Receivable. k i At present, the city has no policy for monitoring de- linquent assessments receivable, nor has a procedure been devel- oped to enforce collection of such amounts. At June 30 1983, outstanding assessments which hadno principal payments during the r. year totaled approximately $749,400. While the assessment is legally ;a lien against the related property, foreclosure is a lengthy and costly process. We recommend you review past due accounts and make every effort to collect them. consider using finance charges or alternative financing such as interest only payments for period of time. P it �ff t r Improve Interim Financial Reporting Information. Your present interim financial reporting does not compare revenues against the category of expenditures for which the budget was developed; nor are expenditures accumulated in a manner which allows a meaningful comparison with your appropriations. As a' result', department managers do not have timely and accurate finan- cial information, overexpenditures of appropriations could occur on a monthly basis and the City could spend more than it actually takes in during any period of time. We recommend you review and evaluate internal financial reporting procedures used to accumulate interim data. Your efforts should especially be directed toward revenue reporting and budget versus actual expenditures reporting. Consider establishing a monthly encumbrance accounting system to facilitate reporting of all known obligations. 4 4 Modify Cash Accounting Procedures. Currently, the City's checking account` requirements are met with one account. This account is 'used 'to process both computer generated and manually prepared checks. Both payroll and ,general expenditure checks are issued through this account. Further, the computer system is ;designed so that proper recording of accounts payable at year end is only accomplished by actually preparing the check, even though the payment may not be mailed for 2 or 3 weeks. We recommend you assess your checking account require- ments and the related computer software used to process cash and `accounts payable transactions. Consider separate bank accounts for pays®ll and general expenditures. Consider modifying the soft- ware so accounts payable can be properly accrued without preparing the checks. , Continue to Develop a Written Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual:. As the City continues to grow, control over the recording of accounting transactions becomes increasingly difficult. As' a result, inconsistent treatment of `simil- . transactions may result and financial statements may become inaccurate. An accounting policies and procedures manual with descriptive explanations, clearly defined accounting policies, procedures and job descrip- tions is needed to supplement the present document. Items which should be included in the manual are: An organizational chart which specifies to whom each employee is responsible. Job descriptions, including areas of responsibility and details of daily, weekly andmonthly procedures to be followed. Descriptions of 'Journals, ledgers and entries to be posted to them. A listing of reports to be prepared, together with distribution lists and the purpose of each report. Expense/expenditure reimbursement and other interfund transaction policies Specific and detailed accounting policies on such items as preassessment of Local Improvement Districts, Bancroft bond issuance procedures, detailed accounting for special assessment projects, fixed asset accounting and repairsf and maintenance. 6 ig Continue to Develop a Written Accounting Policies and Procedures { Manual, continued. The development of an accounting policies and procedures manual is necessary to: Improveconsistency and accuracy in the recording of transactions. Aid in the distribution of work among the accounting staff. Provide ' guidelines for performance of accounting func- tions in the absence of certain members of the accounting staff. Provide a ready source of information in training personnel. s 7 1 a i i t i w : } Y{{ i t STATUS OF PRIOREAR COMMENTS f. I < r f t 3 STATUS OF COMME14TS FROM PRIOR YEAR REPORT TO MANAGEMENT COMMENT STATUS OF COMMENT Improve Special Assessment Modified and repeated' Fund Accounting Consider Charging Deprecia- Comment implemented in 1982 tion on Sewer Fund Con- tributed Fixed Assets Directly to Contributed Capital Improve Cash Management Comment implemented in 1982 Improve Interim FinancialModified and repeated Reporting Information Consider Self Insurance This was considered during 1983 by; City management and deemed not feasible at this time Account for Storm Sewer Storm Drainage Fund established Supplemental Billings in 1983 in a Special Revenue Fund i Determine an Administrative A 2% fee has been established Fee Schedule for for all projects Local Improvement f District Projects Consider Adequacy of Continent implemented in 1983 Fidelity Bond Coverage Update the Accounting Manual Comment still applies, repeated in 1983 s y e r " t • • w •t • ..g c sS ,t st i !F^�•F3�. 3 Y ti; fi:, gg 55" { 3Y �3 r H � ax cn- 'sce .fir h7 '"s -mss; '2&`.::;r IRA w �:zw. ..,,�. ,�` .st:.:. .•5 �..t �:�..:.e:-'-ea`4�.-..�r��''�, z�r.�.,.3, ;,�,�; � --- " ....�,. ,�---•�=#`�t .,-.-;�. � �:.:`,�-*s.� s. - r�� ;v _ t x r '�-t'.�;.. ? �, �� f�.,��._ �'�� .,:� may,.. L•.:..�` ;�3;:• , �4 fi5-".r�°-�i+�; �'fi. '�`c�.�aKp��" .,.�'-:;a.,r'�o-`�.w�-.., xt' �'=r.# f C�^.�:�. R '}r:s :�..:"-:,.r-=�{ -s ..S^:z<a_ "`� ,. �7.•. ,x ,.:_ ._ _ s A 'fi��'tit `':v� sF� `-.sem{. man CITY OF T-I GARD, 'OREGON COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT fiscal year ended June 30, 1983', prepared by the City of Tigard Department of Finance Doris Hartig, Director of Finance y q i l � CITY OF TIGARD, ' OREGON 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page i INTRODUCTORY SECTION: i-vii r; Letter of Transmittal viii Mayor and City Council Members ix Organization Chart FINANCIAL SECTION: 4 ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEME14TS (General Purpose Financial Statements) : s Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and 3 Account Groups Combined Statement of `Revenues, 'Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Govern- 4 mental Fund Types Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and 5 4 Actual All Governmental Fund Types Combined Statement oRevenues, Expenses and f ... Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit)/ 4 Fund Balances --A11 Proprietary Fund ',Types and Similar Trust Funds 6 Combined Statement of Changes in Financial E Position - All Proprietary Fund Types 7 r and Similar Trust Funds 8 Notes to Combined Financial Statements SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (Combining and Individual Fund and Account Group Statements and Other Financial Schedules) : General Fund: 25 s Statement of Revenues Budget and Actual Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual 25 E Special Revenue Funds: ?7 Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 28 Statements of Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual: 29 Federal Revenue Sharing Fund 30 State Tax Street Fund Major Street Capital Project Fund 31 Park and Recreation Development Fund 32 County Road Maintenance and Repair Fund 33 Road Fund 34- a' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued P Page i FINANCIAL SECTION, Continued: r' SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (Combining and Individual. z' Fund and Account Group Statements and other Financial Schedules) , Continued: Special Assessment Fund: Statement of Revenues and Expenditures- Budget and Actual 35 Enterprise Funds: Combining Balance Sheet 36 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and 37' Changes in Retained Earnings '# Combining Statement of Changes in Financial Position 38 Statements of. Revenues and Expenses - Budget and Actual: Sewer Fund 39 Storm Drainage Fund 40 e General Fixed Assets Account Group: , Statement of General Fixed Assets By Sources 41 ' Statement of Changes in General Fixed Assets - k By Sources' 42 Statement of General Fixed Assets '- By Function 43 and Activity Statement of Changes in General Fixed Assets - By Function and Activity 44 Other Schedules: Schedule of Property Tax Transactions and 45 Outstanding Balances r Schedule of Bond and Bond Interest Transac- 46 L tions Bancroft Improvement Bonds Schedule of Future Debt Service Requirements of Bancroft Improvement Bonds 47 s STATISTICAL SECTION: General Governmental Expenditures By Function - F Budgetary Basis - for the Last Ten Fiscal Years 48 General Governmental Revenues By Source - Budgetary Basis - for the Last Ten Fiscal Years 49 Property Tax Levies and Collections - for the Last Ten Fiscal Years 50 E CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued page � 4 STATISTICAL SECTION, Continued: Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable 51 k' Property for the Last Ten Fiscal Years Property Tax Rates All Overlapping Governments - 52 for the Last Ten Fiscal Years Special Assessment Collections - for the Last Ten 53 Fiscal Years Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita - 54 for the Last Ten Fiscal Years 55 ' Computation of Legal Debt Margin Computation of Overlapping General Obligation 56 Debt Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General 57 Expenditures - 'for the Last Ten Fiscal Years Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits for the Last Ten Fiscal Years 58 59 Principal Taxpayers 60 Demographic Statistics 61 MiscellaneousStatistical Data AUDIT COMMENTS AND DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS: 62 Introductory Comments 63 Internal Accounting Control 64 € Accounting Records Compliance with Legal Requirements: 64 Budget Compliance 64 Indebtedness Adequacy of Collateral Securing Depository r 64 Balances E` Programs Funded from Outside Sources: 65 Federal and State Grants { Federal Revenue Sharing 65 65 ° Insurance and Fidelity Bond Coverage 66 Cost Accounting System u. t CRYOFTIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON September 30, 1983 t ' Mayor Wilbur Bishop and 'Members of the City Council We are pleased to submit the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Tigard, Oregon for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 . This report was prepared by the City's Department of Finance. Responsibility for the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presenta- tion including all disclosures, rests with the City. We believe the data, as presented, is accurate in all material aspects, and is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the finan- cia1-`position and 'results of operations of the 'City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds, and all dis- closures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum under- standing of the city' s financial affairs have been included. This report has been prepared in accordance with gener- ally accepted accounting principles and follows guidelines recommended by the Municipal Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada. ACCOUNTING SYSTEM AND BUDGETARY CONTROL The City's general governmental operations are main- tained on a modified accrual basis, with revenues being recorded when measurable and available and expenditures being recorded when the goods or services are received. The City's enterprise Rinds are maintained on the accrual basis. In the development, evaluation and the necessary modification of the city's accounting system, consideration has been given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and z 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 'i'4GARU,O(aEGOlV 97223 Pi-!:$33-4171 — the reliability of financial records for preparing financial tatements and maintaining accountability for k assets.: The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: G the cost of a control should not exceed" the ;benefits likely to be derived and the evaluation of costs and benefits require estimates and judgments by management. j All internal control evaluations occur within the above framework. We believe assetls va City's provide reasonable accounting easonable asuranceo of adequately safeguard proper recording of financial transactions. to budget all funds. state law The City is required by - The budgeting process includes chearings and inP'Ind apprQval of thero�ignal stages of preparation, public ' the City council. Additional resources not anticipated budget by - in the original 'budget lmay be em alabudge through.requires hearings before6 mental' budget. A supplemental raval by the City x _ the public, publications in newspapers ;and app be modified by` { Council. original and supplemental budgets `may `transfers between the cost categories. the use of appropriationCouncil. Such transfers require approval by the City c Budgetary control is maintained at the program level ria Y comparison of estimated purchase amounts with adopted appro P Pur- tions prior to the release of pin an urchase ove run ers ofoprogramsbalances chase orders which could appropriations are made avail- are not released until additional appro p able. THE REPORTING ENDITITY AND ITS SERVICES This report includes all of the funds and account groups of the city assn eche ch meet the criteria areport oasasetaforth itions n National council on f for inclusion _ _ Governmental Accounting (FdCGA) Statement No. 3, Defining the Governmental Entity. The bas a�newal Agency of Eh—ed—ity a capital projects fund since . been arzcluded an thisreport meets NCGA Statement No. 3 criteria. The City provides a range of services as authorized in its Charter. This includes police protection, street construction and maintenance, sanitary sewers and stormewe improvementsy and d parks, land use planning and zoning, public administrative services. ii j F t General Governmental Functions E, Refor general governmental functions Gall govern- s overn- P mental. funds) on a generally accepted accounting principles basis i totaled $4,316,701 i , an increase of over last n fiscal 1983 as year. The increase over last year wprimarily due to a 'sub stantial increase in' collections of special assessments on Local Improvement District projects.' The amount of revenues from various C. sources and changes from last year are as follows: I Increase Percent (Decrease) a of From Revenue Source Amount Total Fiscal 1982 $ 728,641 16.9% $ 38, 523 ' Taxes 449,778 10.4 59,141 Franchise fees 775,749 18;0 714, 681 Special assessments 80,200 798 Licenses and permits 347,325 33. 8.0 g 64,991 � Intergovernmental revenues 1`443,460 1.0 (13, 613) Charges for services (1, 692)1:3 (1, 692) Fines and forfeitures 459,299 10.7 _18,379 Miscellaneou 8,379Miscellaneous revenues $4. _11 _70>_ 1�=9% $270 610 Intergovernmental revenues consist primarily of state gas taxes.. and county road maintenance and repair taxes for im- provement' of streets and highways, Federal and State Revenue Sharing entitlements and state liquor and ast ciga oettt l axes. Intergovernmental revenues increased by only 4.6% Taxes consist of property taxes on commercial and residential real and personal property within the City. Taxes increased only 5.6% over last year. Assessedproperty valuations of approximately $68.2 million represented an increase of 11.1% over last year. This increase is mainly attributable to continuing construction of commercial property in the city and demand for residential ax property as well as inflationary increases S. down Curg2 2%tfrom�last- tions were 88.33% of the current tax levy, year. This decrease is due primarily to the general economy. The total collections (current and delinquent) to the current tax levy was 93 .54%. Expenditures for general governmental purposes on a generally accepted accounting principles basis totaled $5,513,591 in fiscal 3983, an increase of 20.8% over last year. This increase is due to a substantial increase in capital outlay projects for local improvement districts in the Special Assessment Fund, a 58% increase over last year. This increase was partially offset ii1 W AN i by City-wide efforts to maintain or reduceother expenditures. The amount of expenditures by major functions of the City as r compared to last year is as follows: Increase Percent ' (Decrease) of From Function Amount Total Fiscal 1982 Community services $1,044,720 18.9% $ (546,488) Community;development 1,126,758 20.4 13,548 Policy and administration 154,184 - 29 (128,165) City-wide support functions 353,765 6.4 3,415 Capital outlay 2,656,677 48.2 1,475,193 Debt service 177,487 3.2 134,062 X00_0°0 $ 951 .565 Total unreserved fund balances of the City showed a combined >deficit of $1,415,714 at June 30 1983 . The deficit consists of a $2,594,748 deficit in the Special Assessment Fund and combined balances in the remaining .funds of $1,179,034. The deficit arose because of the application of generally accepted accounting principles to financial reporting for the Special Assessment Fund. Revenues are recognized only ,to the extent that individual installments are considered current assets. The deficit will be reduced and eliminated as deferred special assess- ment installments, which are subject to lien, become current assets and are collected. ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS The Enterprise Funds are used to finance and account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of City sewer and storm drainage facilities. The operations of these funds are accounted for in such a manner as to show a profit or loss similar to comparable private enterprises. Sewer Fund Operating revenues amounting to $339,537 were derived from service charges during fiscal year 1983. Operating expenses totaled - $516,175. Net loss was $166,257 after nonoperating interest revenues were considered for the fiscal year. Rate increases were enacted in June 1982 by the Unified Sewerage Agency, owner of certain sewage treatment and collection facilities used by the City. An accounting change was made this year to transfer depreciation on certain contributed assets from retained earnings to contributed capital. This more clearly reflects the cost of our sewer operation. iv WNW � x Storm<Drainage Fund This fund was established during fiscal 1983 to separate sewer service activities from storm drainage activities. Oper- ating revenuesamounting to $128,195 ; were derived from storm drainage service charges. Net income, including nonoperating interest revenue, was $92,183. • RETIREMENT PROGRAMS ' The City has three retirement options for'' employees. All nonpolice _personnel can choose between an IRA and/or the ICMA Deferred Compensation program. Police personnel have a defined benefit and defined contribution pension plansthroughBanker's Life' Insurance' Company. Banker' s Life acts as administrator of the ;pension plan. The police pension plans are accounted for in the Pension Trust Fund. POOLED CASH AND INVESTMENTS For the purpose of maximizing yields on short-term invest- ments, temporary excess cash of all funds is pooled. Results of investment activity for the fiscal year are shown below in com- parison with the previous year: Investment Income 1983 1982 $' 34,301 $ 29,126 General Fund 96,339 156,704 Special Revenue Funds 86,382 28,767 Special Assessment Fund 11,967 22,310 Enterprise Funds 48,038 Pension Trust Fund $2__7_,Q27 $2��. 07 information not available Investments at the end of fiscal year 1983 totaled $2, 539,601 at cost. City investments are approved by the State Treasurer in accordance with the Oregon Revised Statutes. Auto- matic deposits of shared revenues from other governmental agencies are transmitted directly to the state administered local govern- ment investment pool. However, due to noncompetitive interest rates offered by the pool during fiscal year 1983, the _City utilized the _pool's services only as a clearing account for these direct deposits and for investments with very short terms. The interest earnings of investments are allocated to participating funds on the basis of the monthly average of their eaui-ties in the pooled accounts v 99911-W BONDED INDEBTEDNESS •�t, The City's total outstanding bonded debt at June 30, ; nd 1983 was $2,889,464, all of which were Bancroft improvement bonds- , ° 3- Bancroft improvement bonds are not subject to the debt limitations,_ ,: t described in the following paragraph. The City has no general .0 obligation debt. The State of Oregon mandates a general obligation debt _ ,bi_ limit of 3 percent of true cash value of taxable property within the City boundaries. This limit computed to an amount of $20,585,970 for the City at June `30, `1983. The City's net debt subject to this limitation was zero, leaving the amount available cx for future indebtednessat $20,585,970.' CONCLUSION In recent years many advancements in financial management policies and procedures have been made by the City in an effort to achieve a sound financial system. According to the Municipal Finance Officers Association (MFOA) , "The Certificate of Conformance is the highest form of 'recognition in the area of governmental financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by ,a governmental 'unit `and its management" . It is at,^)_ our "opinion that this report conforms to these standards. The overall financial condition of the City of Tigard as of June 30 1983, is excellent given the current recessionary economic climate. The city continues to provide services to, its Citizens well within its resources. However, as inflation and recession, continue at rates greater than revenues, the City's management is continually searching for ways to increase resources and implement cost reduction programs. Both areas are under constant review, and all areas of opportunity are being thoroughly explored so that basic City services are not adversely affected by these economic factors. The future of the City of Tigard's economic vitality appears to be very good. The City continues to grow in spite of a generally depressed economy in the State of Oregon. The City is completing a Capital Improvement Plan that includes a master street plan, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and park and open space plans The Community Development Plan is in the final stages for adoption and submission ,to the State's Land Conserva- tion and Development Commission for review in accordance with statewide planning goals and guidelines. INDEPENDENT AUDIT The State of Oregon (OILS 297.405 to 297.555) requires an annual audit of the fiscal affairs of the City by independent public accountants selected by the City Council. This requirement has been complied with and the auditor's opinion has been included in this report. vi t 4 ACYU40WLEDGMENTS � tude to the We would like to " who asress our sistedaandcere glcontr buted to personnel of the Finance Department reciation is also extended m the preparation of this report. Appreciation department managers, , ; to the '14ayor, City Council and many Y p financial health of the whose continuing support. is :vital to the City of Tigard, Oregon. Respectfully submitted, i x Doris Hartig Finance Director k <i F Robert W. Jean City Administrator . vii f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS AS OF JUNE 30, 1983 Name Term Expires Mayor Wilbur A Bishop January 1, 1985 10590 S. w. Cook Lane Tigard, Oregon 97223 Councilman Kenneth W. Scheckla (President) January 1, 1985 10890 S. W. Fairhaven Tigard, Oregon 97223 Councilman Tom'Brian January '1, 1987 7630 S. W. Fir Street Tigard, -Oregon'97223 Councilman John E. Cook January 1, 1985 10455 S. W. Johnson Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 ` January 1, 1987 Councilwoman Ima Scott 14873 S.W. 106th TIgard, Oregon 97223 r Robert Jean, City Administrator Doris Hartig, City Recorder/Director or Finance LEGAL COUNSEL Edward J. Sullivan O'Donnell, Sullivan, & Ramis 1727 N. W. Hoyt Portland, Oregon 97209 viii. 2 W 7. o66_ :7 0 m o ` 2 O w aL � o a> W Z w a 0 Q a > fP°m- a G t ' N <sp! p W w ¢ N W DN U Z W 2 til p z V C, bNJ sE qx° mw Ya V) V x. > N Z Y F N -. O N F, N Lqz ~ = W p W a O F- W F W N N N [- N 4-i EO ¢O OU .,10 tS r z z -- y i<-� u z U u ¢ V O N Z ¢ a Z � L) Z O cU,u, z N _ q F a a z o�F a E z� g -gyEm W O J O ZO - U) U .. ZZ. E.., I.> Z W^+ F S G o z 0 FINANCIAL SECTION certified public accountants Coo ers Uy rand Honorable Mayor and Council Members City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon We have examined the combined financial statements of the City of Tigard., Oregon as of and for the year ended June '30, ` 1983, as <listed in the table of contents. Our ,examination was made in accordance with generally accepted` auditing; standards and the Minimum Standards for Audits of Oregon Municipal Corpora- tions- and, accordingly, included such tests of the 'accounting records and such other auditing procedures as :we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the combined financial statements re- ferred to above present fairly the financial position of the City of Tigard, Oregon at June 30`, 1983, and the results of its opera- tions and the changes in financial position of its Enterprise Funds and Pension Trust Fund for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year after giving retroactive effect to the changes, with which we concur, in accounting for the Pension Trust Fund, accumulated vacation pay, transferring depre- ciation from retained earnings to contributed capital for certain contributed fixed assets and the deferral of special assessment revenues, all as described in Note 3 .to the combined financial statements. A Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The "Total (Memorandum Only)" columns on the combined financial statements and the combining, individual fund, and account group financial statements and schedules listed as supplementary data in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the combined financial statements of the City of Tigard, Oregon. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examina- tion of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole. 1 lian Iffin I- = 1 ON The other 'data '-included in this report, designated as the statistical section in the table of contents, has not been r audited by us and, accordingly, we express no opinion on such data. COOPERS &''LYBRAND By CC James L. Savage,; a partne Portland, Oregon September 14, 1983 t 2 t COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (General Purpose Financial Statements) 0 iw: Wall i E . (This page intentionally left blank) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COMBINEDBALANCE'SHEET ALL FU14D TYPES AND'ACCOU14T GROUPS June 30, ,1983 Governmental ; Special ASSETS General Revenue f Assets: Cash and investments $ 407,625 $1,063,527 Accounts receivable'- 278,598 58,453 Property taxes receivable 124,298 Interest receivable 245 4,287 Contract receivable 129,982 r Assessment liens receivable " 257,173 2,715 Due from other funds' Inventory of;,gasoline 3,737 . Fixed 'assets, net Amount to be provided for payment of accrued vacation pay - Total assets $1•?_OI.658 51 728.98?. LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Liabilities: Accounts payable and:accrued liabilities $ 178,375 Deposits 42,721 Accrued'bond coupon interest Due to other funds 188,744 - $ 211,955 Deferred revenues: Account receivable 244,146 22,384 Property taxes 124,298 Contracts receivable 129,982 Assessment liens receivable Accrued vacation pay Bonds payable Total liabilities 908,266 234,339 { Fund equity: Contributed capital Investment in general fixed assets Retained earnings Fund balances (deficit): Reserved for employee retirement benefits Unreserved: Designated for bike path construction 5,100 Designated for band stand construction 3,718 Undesignated 289,674 889,543 Total fund equity 293,392 894,643 Total liabilities and fund equity The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements. 3 i Eking-E- -N y Fund Account Groups Total Fund Types Proprietary Fiduciary Memorandum Special Fund Tyle - -ype General'Fzxed General Long ( Only) Capital- Sp Term Debt projects Assessment Ente�rPrise Fens�.on Trust Assets $ 3,245,689 $ 9,361 $1,142,199 $ 70,397 $552,580 523,468 186,417 130,010 560 5,152 9,315 31 4,662 90 129,982 2,751,376 2,751,376 463,632 188,744 15,000 3,737 2,709,095 $1,891,252 41600,347 $98,587 98,587 $ 2 5s0 Si 8 i 2 S9@LSA $11 ��$�143 $ 1,505,699 $ 3,393 $1,172,581 S ' 151,350 42`,721 6,394 6,394 463,632 15,000 43,093 4,840 268,812 ` 2,282 124`,858 560 129,982 2,570,197 2,570,197 $98,587 108,897 70,310 2,889,464 2,889,464 98,587 8,110,656 18,953 6_681,729 168,782 2,440,933 2,440,933 $1,891,252 1,891,252 376,436 376,436 552,580 $552,580 5,100 3,718 (1,424,53 (9,0 :L) 1 424,539,001) (2,594,748) 3,845,487 (9,�J01} (2,594,748) 2,817r'?69 552, 80 1,891,252 S 9.9`2 $44U. 5I�.2�,.1.4�. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON g COMB1 NDSTATEMENT FUND ALANCEXPENDITURES S -ALL GGOVE£Rh?ENTALL FUND TYPES CHANGES TYPES for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 3 i< Total capital Special (Memorandum Special P Only) General Revenue Projects Asset # ® $ 4881 $ 728,641 , Revenues: $ 723,760 449,778 Taxes 449,778 $ 775,749 775,749 ' Franchise fees 347,798 Special assessments 241,175 $ 106,623 1,456,325 Licenses and permits 438,903 1,017,422 43,460 Intergovernmental revenues 43,460 55,651 Charges for services 55,651 Fines and forfeitures 96,339 37 249,899 459,299 4 ._--- Miscellaneous revenues, 113,02 . -- primarily interest -- 1,220,384 4,918 1,02_ 5,648 4,31 701 _ 6 Total revenues 2,065,751_' Expenditures: 1,044,720 r Current: 1 1,044,720 ,126,758 z Community services 1 126,758 154,184 Community development 154,184 ration 353,765 Policy and administ City-wide support func- 353,765 2,642,758 2,656,677 tions 13,919 Capital outlay 177,487 177,487 Debt service: 5,513,591 Interest - -- 13,919 2.82_ 0,245 ---'-- 2,679,427 Total expenditures _._------ Excess of revenues � over (under) (613,676) 1,220_•384 (9,001) (1,794,597) (1,196,890) ;. expenditures Other financing sources 557,324 1,804,851 (uses): 1247,527 (1,804,851) Operating transfers in 1(557,324) (1,247-,527) Operating transfers out _ Total other financing 690,203 (1,2471527) 55- 7-=-32 sources (uses) Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) 1,237,273) expenditures 76,527 (2_ 7___3143) (9,001) (-- and other uses Fund balances -June 30, 1982, 216,865 921,786 37,419 1,176,070 as previously reported (1,394,894) (1,394,894) Prior period adjustment - Fund balances ^- June 30, 1982, 216,865 __921,786 (1,35_ 7°_475) (21�=-) as restated $(] `z3�9) Fund balances (deficit) - $ $ June 30, 1983 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements. 4' Masi CITY OF`TIGARD,`OREGON COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES EJD IN'FUND,BALANCES -`BUDGET AND ACTUAL -"ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES for the`fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 E. General FundSpecial Revenue Funds Variance - Variance Favorable Favorable t Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Revenues:` Tares $ 742,850` $ 723,760 $ (19,090) Franchise fees 431,768 449,778 18,010 Special assessments C Licenses and permits 252,000 241,175 (10,825) $ 143,500 $ 106,623 $(36,877) Intergovernmental revenues 397,146 438,903 41-,757 967,570 1,017,422 49,852 Charges for services 100,000; 43,460 (56;540) Fines and forfeitures 89,160 55,651 (33,509) Miscellaneous'revenues, primarily interest 120,500 113,024 (7,476) 37,500 96,339 58,839 Total revenues 2;333,424 2,065,751 (67,673) 1,148;570 1,220,384 71,814 Expenditures: Current: ") Community;services 1,630,653` 1,527,913 102,740 Community development 2,786,967'' 1,126,758 1,660,209 Policy and administration 161,943 ' 154,184 7,759 City,-wide support functions 384,684 353,765 30,919 Contingency 55,414 55,414 Capital outlay Debt service: Principal retirement 1 Interest Total expenditures 5,019,661 3,162,620 1,857,041 Excess ofrevenues over (under)'expenditures' (2,886,237) (1,096,869) ; 1,789,368 1,148;570 1,220,384 71,814 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from interfund loan - Operating transfers in 2,669,372 1,730,720 (938;652) Operating transfers out (557,324) _ (557,324) (2,070,356) (1,247,527) 822,829 Total other financing sources (uses) 2,669,372 1,173,396 (1,495,976) (2,070,356) (1,247,527) 822,829 Excess of revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses (216,865) 76,527 293,392 (921,786) (27,143) 894,643 Fund balances -budgetary basis, June 30, 1982 216,865 216,865 - 921,786 921,786 - Fund balances - budgetary basis, June 30, 1983 $____z_ 293,392 $ 293.392 $__ 894,643 5894.643 Adjustments from budgetary basis to generally accepted accounting principles: Cumulative effect of differences between budgetary basis and generally accepted accounting principles basis of reporting fund balance Assessment project expenditures not budgeted operating transfer in not budgeted Bond principal payments budgeted as expenditures Interfund loan budgeted as operating transfer in Fund balances (deficit) generally accepted accounting principles ` basis, June 30, 1983 5��432 S_ 894.643 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements. 5 Capital Projects Fund Special Assessment Fund Total (memorandum Only) Variance - Variance - Variance - ;. Favorable Favorable Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavorable) g $ 5,300 $ 4,881 $ (419) $ 748,150 $ 728,641 $ (19,509) 431,768 449,778 18,010 rl $ 72,890 $ 775,749 $ 702,859 72;890 775,749 702,859 395,500 347,798 (47,702) 1,364,716 1,456,325 91,609 ) 100,000 43;460 (56,540) 89,160 55,651 (33,509) , 200 37 (163) 162,959 249,899 86,940 321;159 459,299 138,140 5,500 4,918 (582) 235,849 1,025,648 789,799 3,523;343 4,316,701 793,358 (. 1,630,653 1,527,913 102,740 2,786,967 1,126,758 1,660,209 161,943 154,184 7;759 384,684 353,765 30,919 55,414 55;414 16;250 13,919 2,331 16,250 13,919 2,331 79,795 34,795 45,000 79,795 34,795 45,000 177,487 177,487 177,487 177,487 16,250 13,919 2.331 257,282 212,282 45,000 5,293,193 3,388,821 1,904,372 , (10;750) (9,001) 1,744 21,433) 813,366 834,799 (1,769,850) 9270880 2,697,730 ( 15,000 15,000 15;000 15,000 (938,652} 2,669,372 1,730,720 (2,070,356) ,(1,80,1,851) 265,505 614,016 (59,131) (673,147) 15,000 15,000 r, 4,250 5,999 1,749 (21,433) 813,366 834,799 (1,155,834) 868,749 2,024,583 91,433 222,854 131.421 1,230,084 1,361,505 1310421 ' a $ 4 250 5,999 $ 70.000 1,036,220 $ 966.220 $ 7 4.2 5Q 2,230,254 r (1,580,329) (1,580,329) " (2,642,758) (2,642,758) e, 557,324 557,324 34,795 34,795 �. (15,000) (15,000) 512�4J,) $(2�z`�4.74s) S(L4 . ZL4) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND { CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)/FUND BALANCES - t ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES AND SIMILAR TRUSTFUNDS , for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 47- Proprietary Fiduciary Total Fund Type Fund T (Memorandum Enterprise Pension Trust - { OPERATING REVENUES: $467,732 $ 467,732 k Sewer service charges $ 65,087 65,087 Pension contributions Total operating revenues 4_67,732 65,087 532,819 OPERATING EXPENSES: 257,503 257,503 Salaries;and wages73,398 ' Employee benefits 73,398 60,238 60,238 Contracted services56',910 56,910 General and administrative and other 155,724 105,724 Depreciation 5,079 5,079 Benefit;payments and withdrawals 5,077 5,077 Contract charges 553,773 10,156 563,929 Ictal operating expenses operating income (loss) (86,041) 54,931 (31,110) ,038 60,005 NONOPERATING REVENUE - (74,074) 102Interest 11,967 02,969 28,895 Net income (loss) � a ' Add depreciation on fixed assets acquired by grants, entitlements, and shared a revenues externally restricted for capital acquisitions and construction 92 984 92,984 that reduces contributed capital Increase in retained earnings 18,910 102,969 _1.21,879 RETAINED_EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - June 30, 1982 (330,570) (330,570) as previously reported P68A,096 449,611 1,137,707 Prior period adjustments 1982, as restated 357,526 449,611 807,137 RETAINED EARNINGS - June 30, Sal- 36 RETAINED EARNINGS`- NNE 30, 1983 S -5 $ 429 G16 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements. 6 - CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COMBINEDSTATEMENTOF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION - f ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES AND SIMILAR TRUST FUNDS for the fiscal,year ended June 30, 1983 Proprietary Fiduciary Total Fund Tyne Fund Type (Memorandum ri Enter se -Pension Trust Only) Working capital provided (used): In operations: $(74,074) $102,969 $ 28,895> Net income (loss) Charges to operations not requiring outlay of working capital in the current period - 105,724 105,724 depreciation m operations 31,650 102,969 134,619 Working capital provided fro Working capital used - additions to fixed assets, 35,143) 3( 5,143) net of donated assets of $584,425 �--- Increase (decrease) in working capital $ ) �. Changes in components which increased (decreased) working capital: $(47,355) $102,969 $ 55,614 Cash and investments 83,369 83,369 Accounts receivable ' 3,891 3,891 Property taxes receivable 14 14 Fes . Interest receivable'` 15,000 15,000 Due from other funds 62,928) (62,928) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities ( 3,858 3,858 Due to other funds 10,968 10,968 Deferred revenue15 0,310) 1�) Accrued vacation pay ing capital Increase (decrease) in workS c3.49 �'c) 5142:,9b9 $�Z�. :8 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined financial statements. i� L i~ NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS` 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Description of the Reporting Entity The<combined `financial statements of the City of Tigard include , the financial activities of the City and the Tigard Urban Renewal ` Agency. Their financial operations are closely related and the City Council has a continuing oversight responsibility over both entities. Oversight responsibility is determined on the basis of budget adoption, taxing authority, funding and appointment of the governing board. There are many other governmental agencies including Washington County and certain school districts and various service Districts which provide services within the City of Tigard. These agencies have independently elected governing_boards and the 'City does not manifest any oversight responsibility. Therefore, financial -information for these ,agencies is not included in the accompanying combined financial statements. The inclusion of 'Tigard Urban Renewal Agency as a capital projects fund in the combined financial statements of the City was made to conform to National Council on Governmental Accounting Statement No. 3 "Defining the "Governmental;Entity" . Prior to July Z, 1982, the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency did not have any financial activ- ities. Bases of Accounting The Governmental Fund Types are maintained on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of account- ing revenues are recorded in the accounting period in which they become measurable and available and expenditures are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, except for: Interfund transactions for services which are recorded on the accrual basis. Interest on general obligation bonds which is recorded on its due date. significant revenues which were measurable and available at June 30, 1983 under the modified accrual, basis of accounting were as follows: Federal and state grants (to the extent that revenues are recorded as eligible expenditures are incurred) . 8 AM _ y F CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued r 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: 3 Buses ,of Accounting, Continued Federal revenuesharing entitlements. f State', county and local shared revenues for cigarette tax, liquor tax and other. k The Enterprise Funds; and Pension Trust Fund 'are accounted for utilizing ,the accrual basis of accounting. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded at the time they are } earned and expenditures are recorded at the t ime liabilities are incurred. t The bases of accounting described above, are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Total (Memorandum Only) Columns z The Total (Memorandum Only) columns on the combined financial statements represent an aggregate of the columnar statements by fund ;type ,and account group; they do not represent consolidated financial information. investments Investments, included in cash and investments, are carried at cost which approximates market. i Receivables Receivables for federal and state grants, federal revenue sharing entitlements and state, county and local shared revenues, included in accounts receivable, are recorded as revenue in the governmental funds as earned. Receivables of the Enterprise Funds are recorded as revenue as earned, including services earned but not billed. >: Property .taxes receivable in the General Fund are offset by a deferred revenue account in the liability section of the combined balance sheet and, accordingly, are not recognized as revenues. Property taxes receivable collected within sixty days following d year end are not considered material for recognition as revenues. I s 9 r" rP e i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON , NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued f 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: m Receivables, Continued s CAssessments are recognized as receivables at the time property F owners are 'assessed 'for property improvements. Assessments e receivable expected to be collected in the ensuing year are con- sidered measurable and available and are recognized as revenues All other'assessments receivable are offset by a deferred revenue ; account and, accordingly, have not been recorded as revenue. Contract receivable due from Unified Sewerage Agency in the General Fund is offset ,by a `deferred revenue account`. Revenue is recognized when ,payments on the receivable are made. i 6. Inventory of Gasoline Inventory of gasoline is valued on the first-in, first-out basis and is charged to expenditures as used. EnterpriseFund Fixed Assets Purchased fixed assets are stated at cost and estimated historical - cost. The total amount of fixed assets 'valued at estimated his- torical cost is not available. Donated assets are recorded at estimated appraised value at date of donation. Estimated appraised value of donated assets is determined based on engineering estimates t of current cost or price indexed cost. The amount of fixed assets ` donated is not available. Depreciation is computed on assets in service, using the straight-line method over their estimated use- ful lives: Building 40 years ,' _ - Sewer system 40 years 9 Equipment 5 to 10 years Autos and trucks 3 years x' Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as in- curred. Major additions, improvements and replacements are , capitalized. Gains or losses from sales or retirements of fixed assets are included in operations. General Fixed Assets General fixed assets are stated at cost and estimated historical = cost. The total amount of fixed assets valued at estimated his- torical cost isnot available. Fixed assets are charged to expenditures in the governmental fund types as purchased and u< 10 C CITY OF TIGARD, `OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,, Continued C w 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies_, Continued: General Fixed Assets, Continued capitalized in the General Fixed Assets Account Group`. Mainten- ance and repairs of fixed assets are charged to expenditures in the governmental fund types as incurred and are not capitalized. Expenditures for street and bridge construction, bike path, side- walk and lighting systems are not capitalized as fixed assets. 'As fixed 'assets are disposed of, the estimated historical cost or original cost is .removed from this account group'; proceeds from sales of ',general fixed assets are recorded as General Fund revenue. Depreciation is not computed on fixed assets. Low-Term Debt The City's only long-term bonded debt is bonds payable directly related to and expected to be paid from the Special Assessment Fund'. Therefore, such debt is recorded in this 'fund." Repayment of 'these bonds will be made ,from collections of assessments levied against the benefited property. Accrued Vacation Pay Accumulated vested vacation pay is accrued in the Enterprise Funds as it is earned by employees. In governmental fund types the amounts, if any, expected to be liquidated with expendable available resources are accrued as liabilities of the funds and the amount payable from future resources is recorded in -the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. Accumulated sick leave does not vest and is therefore recorded in all funds when leave is taken. Contributed Capital_ Contributed capital in the Enterprise Funds represents the accumu- lation of contributions in the form of cash or other assets which generally do not have to be returned to the contributor. Such contributions are recorded directly to contributed capital and, accordingly, are not recognized as revenue. The following trans- actions are recorded as contributions in the Enterprise Funds: Receipts of federal and state grants for acquisition of fixed assets. Fixed assets contributed from other funds or the General ' (� Fixed Assets Account Group. Contributions from others for to acquisition or con- struction of fixed assets. k�3kbS C:. h 11 p CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued: Designated Fund Balance Tentative plans for utilization of General Fund balance in future periods are recorded as designations of fund balance. Planned expenditures include commitments for which fund balance has not been appropriated. S Budget A budget is prepared for each governmental fund in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting and legal requirements , set forth in the Oregon Local Budget Law. Appropriations are made at the major program level for each fund. Appropriations may not be legally overexpended. Appropriations lapse at the end of each fiscal year. Budget amounts include original approved amounts and all subsequent appropriations transfers approved by the City Council. After budget approval, the City Council may approve supplemental appropriations if an occurrence, condition, or need exists which had not been ascertained at the time; the budget was adopted. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983, 'numerous appropriations transfers were made, but no supplemental budget appropriations were 'made. The budget for the General Fund includes capital outlay expendi- tures in each program for capital outlay applicable to that pro- gram. Capital outlay expenditures benefiting the City and not an identifiable program are reported separately. The budgets for the General Fund, Capital Projects Fund and Special Assessment Fund are prepared differently from generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - All Governmental Fund Types is presented as a comparison to budget and is reconciled to the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Governmental Fund Types as described in Note 4. f� 2. Organization and Operation: The City of Tigard, under its Charter of 1962, is governed by an elected mayor and four councilmembers who comprise the City Council. ; The City's financial operations are accounted for in the following funds and account groups: 12 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued C: 2. Organization and Operation, Continued: Governmental Fund Types General Fund: This fund accounts for the City's general operations. It is used to account for all transactions not specifically related to the City's other funds. In accord- ance' with` the City's budget, all general government expendi- tures except Capital Projects Fund and Special Assessment Fund expenditures are accounted for in this fund. Operating transfers are made from-the ;special revenue funds to provide the necessarv'earmarked funds for expenditure for legally restricted functions and activities in the General Fund. Special Revenue Funds: Federal Revenue Sharing Fund: This fund accounts for Federal Revenue Sharing` entitlements. State Tax Street Fund: This fund accounts for revenues received from state gasoline taxes which are to be expended as outlined in the Constitution of the State of Oregon, Article IX, Section 3. Major Street Capital Project Fund: This fund accounts for development fees charged on new building construction or remodeling within the City. These fees are to be used for the installing, constructing and extending of extra capacity street facilities. Park and Recreation Development Fund: This fund accounts for development charges imposed upon new residential dwelling units to implement the acquisition, development and expansion of recreational facilities and spaces within the City. County Road Maintenance and Repair Fund: This fund accounts for property tax revenues received from Washing- ton County for the maintenance and repair of roads. Road Fund: This fund accounts for revenues received from Washington County for the maintenance and operation of roads. Capital Projects Fund: This fund (Tigard Urban Renewal Agency) accounts for resources used for the acquisition or construction f of capital facilities. �, 13 .0 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued 2. Organization and Operation, Continued:' Y Governmental Fund Types, Continued Special Assessment Fund: This fund accounts for construction and :financing ,of:specific street and sanitary sewer projects which benefit property owners. The fund's primary financing sources are assessments': against owners of benefitedproperty and contributions from other funds for their share of costs. - Interim financing of construction' projects is provided by general obligationimprovement warrants. The improvement' warrants are repaid upon the issuance of Bancroft improvement bonds when the projects are completed. Proceeds from assess- ments are used for payment of principal and interest on Bancroft' improvement bonds. Enterprise Funds Sewer Fund: This fund accountsforthe City's sewer utility operations. Storm Drainage Fund: This fund accounts for storm drainage construction'operations and maintenance. As of June 30, 1983 4A no storm drains have been constructed. Fiduciary Fund Type Pension Trust Fund: This fund accounts for the police em- ployees pension plans (Notes 3 and 12) Account Groups General Fixed Assets: This account group accounts for the City's investment in fixed assets, with the exception of those assets held by the Enterprise Funds. General Long-Term Debt: This account group accounts for long- term indebtedness (accrued vacation pay) not recorded in the Enterprise Funds and Special Assessment Fund. Payment of accrued vacation pay in this account group will be made from the General Fund. 3. Accounting Chan es: Effective July 1, 1983, the City began accounting for the police pension plans as a Pension Trust Fund. Accordingly, fund balance at June 30, 1982 in. the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit)/Fund Balances - All Proprietary Fund Types and Similar Trust Funds has been included ( in the amount of $449,611. The effect of this change was to increase net income for fiscal 1983 by $102,969. 14 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, ,Continued 3. Accounting Changes, Continued: During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 , the City changed its method of accounting for accumulated vacation pay in the governmental funds by recognizing,vacation pay liabilities in the funds for amounts, if any, expected to be liquidated with expendable available resources and recording the amount payable° from 'future resources in the General Long.-Term Debt 'Account Group. Previously, accumulated vacation pay was not recognized as liabilities inanyof the governmental funds until vacation was taken and- long-term liabilities were not previously recorded in the General Long-Term Account Group. The retroactive Change was made to conform to a recent National Council on Governmental Accounting pronouncement. Accordingly, $98,587 has been recorded in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group. At` June' 30, 1983 no liabilities were recorded in the governmental funds since the accumulated vacation amounts are not expected to be liquidated ® from expendable available resources. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983, ; the City began trans- ferring from retained earnings to contributed capital depreciation on contributed; fixed assets acquired by externally restricted grants, entitlements and shared revenues in the Enterprise Funds. Previously, all depreciation''expense was recorded in retained earnings. The change, which is required to be made retroactively, was made to more properly offset depreciation against the resources for which the contributed fixed assets were originally constructed or acquired. Accordingly, retained earnings was increased and contributed capital was reduced by $688,096 at June 30, 1982 by the amount of accumulated depreciation on contributed assets in prior years. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 , the City changed its method of accounting for revenue recognition in the Special Assess- ment Fund. Previously, as project expenditures were incurred, an amount equal to the, expenditures was recognized as revenue. The current method recognizes revenues as assessment installments become current assets. Accordingly, fund balance at June 30, 1882 has been reduced by $1,394,894, the amount of revenue previously recognized in advance of collection. The effect of this change was to decrease fiscal 1983 revenues by approximately $1,870,000. 4. Reconciliation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Basis to Budgetary Basis: The budget of the City is prepared differently from generally accepted accounting principles. Therefore, the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - All Governmental Fund Types is presented on the t 15 { CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINEDFINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued 4. Reconciliation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Basis to'_Budgetary Basis, Continued: budgetary basis and is adjusted to the Combined Statement of Revenues,, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Govern- mental Fund Types, presented on the generally accepted accounting principles basis. The following ;is a reconciliation of the `differences between the budgetary basis and generally accepted- accounting principles basis for revenues and other sources over (under) `expenditures and other uses for the aforementioned com- bined financial om-bined -financial statements: General Capital Special Fund Projects Assessments Revenues and other sources over (under) , expenditures`and other uses - gener- ally accepted accounting principles basis $ 76,527 $(9,001) $(1,237,273) Expenditures: Reimbursement for charges to enterprise funds budgeted as operating' ` transfers in and recognized as a reduction of community services expenditures on the generally accepted accounting principles basis (483,193) Assessment project expenditures not budgeted 2,642,758 Bond principal payments budgeted as expenditures (34,795) (483,193) 2,607,963 Other financing sources (uses): Reimbursement for charges to enterprise funds budgeted as operating transfers in and recognized as a reduction of community services expenditures on the generally accepted accounting principles basis 483,193 Interfund 'loan budgeted as operating transfer in 15,000 Operating transfer in not budgeted �_, (557,324) 483,193 15,000 (557,324) Revenues and other sources over (under) expenditures and other uses - budgetary basis 16 d, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON; NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued' " 5. Cash and Investments: The amounts at 'June '30: 1983 comprised: Cash on hand $ 585 Cash held by Department of Finance, Washington 408 County Cash in bank demand .deposit accounts 152, 515 Cash with _fiduciary (insurance company for 552, 580 police pension plans) Bank time certificates of deposit, ' at cost 2, 047, 133 Cash on deposit with State of Oregon Local 492,468 Government Investment Pool Total $3 4 The interest rates on bank time certificates of deposit range from 8.0% to 9.625% with maturities to September 26, 1983. 6. Contracts Receivable: This represents the balance due to the City from the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington' County resulting from the sale of certain sewage treatment and collection facilities to the Agency in 1970. This contract is recorded in the General Fund because at the time of sale of the facilities, the City's sewer operations were accounted for in the General Fund. Amounts due at June 30, 1983 comprise: Total receivable $162,478 Less unearned interest 32,496 $12-9--9-8-a The contract requires annual payments of $14,442 plus 5% interest on the unpaid balance to July 1, 1991. 7. Assessment Liens Receivable: Assessment liens receivable represent the uncollected amounts levied against benefited property for the cost of local improve9 ments. Because the assessments are liens against the benefited property, an allowance for uncollectible amounts is not deemed necessary. Substantially all assessments are payable over a period of ten to twenty years. Assessments bear 7% to 10% interest, 17 a ''m Ems. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON (; NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued C 8`. interfund Receivables and Payables } Interfund receivables and payables at June 30, 1983 are: Special Special Capital Assess- Enter- General Revenue Projects ment prise Fund Funds Fund Fund Funds Total c Due from other funds_ General $188,744 $188,744 A Federal Revenue sharing $ 21,448 21,448 Major Street Capital Projects187,792 187,792 County Road Main- tenance and Repair< $ 2,715 2,715 Capital Projects $15,000 15,000 Special Assessment 43,093 43,093 Storm Drainage 4,840 4,840 e . _8_7 4A $ 000 $463.632 Due to other funds: General $209,240 $ 43,093 $ 4,840 $257,173 County Road Main- tenance and Repair 2,715 2,715 r Special Assessment $188,744 188,744 Storm Drainage $15,000 15,000 $188.744 $211_95_ $L5__0Q $ 43 Q93 $-4--84-Q $163.632 s 18 f k CITY OF TIGARD OREGON t NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued �r 9. Fixed Assets: '. Fixed assets and related changes therein are as follows: ENTERPRISE FUNDS Balance Balance June 30, June 30, 1982 Additions Deletions 1983 : Land $ < 2,484 $ 2,484 Building 44,540 44,540 3, 836 430,923 Sewer system 2,836,240 $594,683 Equipment 108,417 14,010 122,427 Autos and rucks 17,835 10,875 28,710 3,009,516 619,568 3,629,084 Less accumulated 724 --9-1-91-9-89 depreciation 814,265 105, $ 844 $ 709 09 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP 371,430 $ 371,430 € Land $ 687 185 $ 6,131 693,315 Buildings Equipment 276,978 57,869 $14,798 320,049 Autos and 'trucks 133,311 49,269 20,503 162,077 r. Office equipment 137,456 33,986 6,882 164,560 315 179,820 Library bo154,505 25, F ' t e 19 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ( NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued t` 10. Bonds Payable:' Bonds payable consist of the unmatured balance of seven issues of ¢; Bancroft improvement bonds recorded in' the; Special Assessment Fund; original amounts - $2,971,149; interest rates ranging from 6% to 16.75"/,. Maturities of bonds at June 30, 1983 are as follows: Principal Bonds Matured Outstanding and Paid Outstanding Fiscal -June;30, Bonds During June 30, Years 1982 Issued Year 1983 Interest 1983 $ 34,795 $(34,795) 1984 40,000 $, 134,464 $" 174,464 $ 275,082 , 1985 45,000 155,000 200,000 250,771 1986 48,000 170,000 218,000 227,678 1987 53,000 190,000 243,000 204,770 1988 58,000 215,000 273,000 181 312 1989-1993 245,000 1,430;000 1,675,000 474,175 1994-1998 6,000 50,000 56,000 42,577 m 1999-2003 50,000 50,000 14,305 $529,795 $2,394,464 $UA-7-91) $Z-533-4-64 $1 670.67 11 Contributed Capital: The changes in contributed capital were as follows: Balance, June 30, 1982, as previously reported $2,637, 588 Prior period adjustment (Note 3) 688,096) Balance, June 30, 1982, as restated 1,949,492 Contributions of sewer system fixed assets from others in fiscal 1983 584,425 Transfer of depreciation on certain contributed fixed assets from retained earnings (92,984) Balance, June 30, 1983 $ ,44Q.933 20 _z t 4. s .. i . { CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON' NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued E C 12. Retirement Plans: y The City contributes 8 percent of basic monthly earnings to an Individual Retirement Account or a "deferred compensation plan 5 for participating employees. Eligible participants include all employees except police employees. Contributions for both plans are made to fiduciaries. The fiduciaries hold the funds in trust and make distributions to retired employees. Expenditures by the city for the Individual Retirement Accounts were $19,982 and $30,273 for the deferred compensation plan for the year ended June 30, 1983. Full-time police employees who have completed six months of service p are participants in'a pension program consisting cf a' defined benefit plan and a ,defined contribution plan. Recuired employer contributions are accounted for in defined benefit plan and required employee contributions, which are also paid by the City, are accounted for in a defined contribution plan. The cost of the defined contribution plan is accrued and funded currently. The cost of the defined benefit plan, including amortization of the unfunded prior service cost over forty years and normal cost, is also accrued and funded currently. Due to the unitary nature of the police pension program,' these two plans have been `accounted `for in one pension' trust -fund. As of July 1, 1982, the police employee's defined benefit plan was changed to provide increased retirement benefits. The effect of f ' the change in the benefit formula resulted in an increase from the previous year in contributions required by the City of $14, 170, an i increase in the present value of vested benefits of $44,640, and an increase in the present value of nonvested benefits of $8,569. A comparison of accumulated plan benefits and plan net assets for the police employees' defined benefit plan as of July 1, 1982, the latest actuarial valuation study, is presented below: Actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits: Vested $292,049 Nonvested 56,311 $ 8.360 Net assets available for benefits $-� -$ The weighted average assumed rate of return used in determining ( the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits was 6.5%. s 21 e ( CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued a r 13. Transactions with Unified Sewerage Agency of 'Washington County: The City of Tigard collects charges for treatment of City sewage on behalf of the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington;County (USA) ' and remits all collections to USA except for 30% ,of sewer service E charges collected, 60% of permit and inspection fees collected, ;and 20% of connection charges collected, in,accordance with an agree- ment :between. the City and USA dated January 18, 1972. Payments of k $632,841 were made to USA during 1983 under this agreement. The net amount retained by the City is reported as revenues in the €, enterprise funds in the Combined Statement of Revenues,' Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit)/Fund Balances - -All Proprietary Fund Types and Similar 'Trust Funds. Revenues are reported net because the City acts in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of LISA. 14. Commitments and Contingencies The City has a contingent liability against its full faith and 1 credit for 'Bancroft improvement bonds recorded in the Special Assessment Fund in the amount of $2,889,464. The City's general credit is obligated on these bonds only to the extent that liens: foreclosed against properties involved in the assessment districts € ' and collections of related assessments and interest are insuffi- cient to retire outstanding bonds and pay bond interest. The City is obligated under various uncompleted construction con- tracts for local improvement districts for approximately $1,716,000. z E , The City is .defendant in several legal actions currently pending. Although their outcome cannot be determined, it is the opinion of management that settlement of these matters will not have a` ' material effect on the combined financial position and results of operations of the City. t 22 [ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued 15. Segment 'Information for Enterprise Funds: The city's two enterprise funds account for the acquisition, w operation, and maintenance of sewer and storm sewer facilities which are supported` by user charges. Segment information for - the year 'ended June 30, 1983 is as follows: Sewer Storm Sewer: Operations Operations Total Operating $ 339, 537 $128, 195 $ 467,732 Depreciation 105, 724 105,724 Operating' income (loss) (176, 638) 90, 597 (86,041) Net income (loss) (166, 257) 92, 183 „(74,074) Current capital contri- butions 584,425 584,425 Fixed assets: ' Additions 619, 568 619,568 Net working capital' 16, 091 92,183 108,274 Total assets 2,893, 014 93,137 2,986,151 Total equity 2,725, 186 92,183 2,817,369 16. Operating Transfers - Budgetary Basis:` Operating transfers in the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expendi- tures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - All Governmental Fund Types for the year ended June 30, 1983 do not equal because of certain transfers not budgeted and transfers made with the enterprise funds. Following is a reconciliation of operating transfers for the year ended June 30, 1983: Total operating transfers in, included in the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual All Governmental Fund Types $1,730,720 Operating transfer from the General Fund to the Special Assessment Fund not budgeted in the Special Assessment Fund 557,324 Operating transfers to the General Fund from the Enterprise Funds recorded as expensesof the Enterprise Funds (483,193) Total operating transfers out, included in the Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Budget and Actual All Governmental Fund Types $1_804.851 23 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, Continued a- 17. Deficit Fund Balances: At June 30, 1983, the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency, a capital Y projects fund, had a deficit fund balance of $9,001. The deficit of $2,594,748 in the Special Assessment Fund at June 30, 1983 arises because;of the application of generally accepted ac- counting principles to c=counting 'principles `to the financial reporting for the fund. Bond proceeds used to financeconstruction of special assessment pro- jects are ro=jectsare not recognized as an "other financing source" because the liabilities for special_ assessment bonds payable are accounted for in the Special Assessment Fund. Special' assessments are recognized as revenue only to the extent that individual install- ments' are considered current assets. The deficits will be reduced and eliminated as deferred special assessment installments, which are subject to lien,: become current assets. `' 18. Subsequent Event: Subsequent to June 30, 1983 the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency, a capital projects fund, was abolished by a vote of the 'citizens of the City of Tigard. The Agency will be terminated upon repay- 'ment'of the loan from the Storm Drainage Fund. 24 i SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (Combining and individual Fund and Account Group Statements and Uthar Financial Schedules) rt y GENERAL FUND C. This fund accounts for the financial operations of the City 'which are not ;accounted for in any other fund. Principal resources are ,property taxes, franchise fees, intergovernmental revenues, licenses and permits, and operating transfers from other funds. Primary expenditures in the General Fund are made for Police protection, public works and general government. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ( GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (Y for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 variance - original Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) s REVENUES: Property taxes: Current year $ 687,750 $ 678,460 $ (9,290) Prior years 55,000 42,197 (12,803) r Other 100 3,103 3,003 Franchise fees 431,768 449,778 18;010 Licenses andpermits 252,000 241,175 (10,825) Revenue from other agencies 397,146 438,903 41,757 Charges for current services 100,000 43,460 (56,540) Bines-and`forfeitures 89,160 55,651 (33,509) Use of money;and property20,000 34,301 14,301 Nonrevenue,receipts 500 13,074 12,574 Recovered expenditures and other 100,000 65,649 (34,351) Total revenues 2,133,424 2,065,751 (67,673) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: Operating transfers in: Federal Revenue Sharing Fund 111,120 101,705 (9,415) _ State Tax Street Fund 277,744 215,040 (62,704) Major Street Capital Project Fund 765,963 674,185 (91,778) Park and Recreation Development Fund 91,000 8,768 (82,232) County Road Maintenance' and Repair Fund 744;359 217,044 (527,315) Road Fund" 80,170 30;785 (49,385) " Sewer Fund 499,016 445,595 (53,421) Storm Drainage Fund 100,000 37,598 (62,402) Total operating transfers in 2,669,372 1,730,720 (938,652) Total revenues and operating transfers in 4,802,796 3,79x,471 (1,006,325) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIATION 216,865 216,865 Total $5.019.6 $4.Oa3.336 $(� 006 3?5) _ 25 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 Budgeted Appropriations* VarianceFavorable avorable Original In' Out Revised Actual (Unfavorable) EXPENDITURES: Community Services: $1,360,504 $(8,000) $1,352,504 $1,284,753 $ 67,751 Personal services 166,294 6,900 173,194 145,055 28,139 Materials and services 89,355 15,600 104,955 48,105 6,850 Capital outlay .Total 1,616,153 14,800 1,630,653 1,527,913 102,740 Community Development: 743,969' 2,794 746,763 681,956 64,807 Personal services 322,666 5,200 327,866 265,853 62,003 Materials and services 193,729`. (3,200) 190,529 77.,636 118,893 Capital outlay 1,554,251,` (32;452) 1`,521,809 107,303 1,414,506 Capital projects + 2;814,625' (27,658) 2,786,967 1,125,758 1,660,209 Total Policy.and Administration: 131,943 2,000 133,943 129,716 4,227 Personal services 20,850 4,200 25,050 22,413 2,637 Materials and services 2,950' 2,950 2,055 895 Capital outlay 7;759 Total 155,743 6,200 161,943 154,184 City-Wide Support Functions: 3,000 18,200 21,200 21,189 11 Personal services 308,352 49,465 357,817 327,717 30,100 Materials.and services 2,600 3,067 5,667 4,859 _ 808 Capital outlay Total 313,952 70,732 384,684 353,765 30,919 119,188 (63,774) 55,414 55,414 Contingency S,D19,661 5,019,661 3,162,620 1,857,041 Total expenditures OPERATING TRANSFER TO SPECIAL 557,324 (557,324) ASSESSMENT FUND Total $3 719.944 $1_291__U2 * Budget appropriations are at the program level_ Further detail is for information only_ 26 c SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS The Special Revenue Funds account for revenue derived from specific tax or other earmarked revenue sources, including federal and state grant awards, which are legally restricted to finance particular functions or activities. Funds 'included in this fund category are: Federal Revenue Sharing State Tax Street Major Street Capital Project Park and Recreation Development County Road Maintenance and Repair Road is �, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SPECIAL REVENUE FU14DS S, COMBINING BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1983 i Major< Federal State Street Park and County Road Revenue Tax Capital Recreation Maintenance Sharing Street Project Development and Repair Road Total ASSETS Cash and investments $72,575r $276,135 $88,756 $580,844 $45,217 $1,063,527 Accounts receivable $26,306 22,384 9,763 58,453 Interest receivable 2,280 482 1,525 4,287 Due from other funds 2,715 2,715 Total assets $2ta 3D_E $94 959 5215.11$ 5A.2afl $. 32 $47,932 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Due to other funds $21,448 $187,792 $ 2,715 $ 211,055 Deferred revenue $22,384 22,384 Total liabilities 21,448 22,384 187,792 2,715 234,339 Fund balances: Designated for bike path construction 5,100 5,100 Undesignated 4,858 67,475 90,623 $x9,238 589,417 $47,932 889,543 u Total fund balances 4,858 72,575 90,623 89,238 589,417 47,932 894,643 Total liabilities and fund balances 526.306 $.94.959 $23.AU $89.238 $592.132 $47,932 $1.128:982 ". 27 a. t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SPECIAL REVENUE FSS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES � AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES r for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 i Major Federal State street Park and County Road Revenue' Tax Capital Recreation Maintenance Sharing .Street Project Development and Repair Road Total' REVENUES: $ 88,043 $18,580 $ 106,623 Licenses and permits $106,545 $260,091 $577,943 $72,843 1,017,422 Intergovernmental revenues 95,339 I¢iscellaneous revenues 18 4,730 45,802 7,926 36,159 1,704 - Total revenues 106,563 264,821 133,845 26,506 614,102 74,547 1,220,384 OTHER FINANCING USES: ;.Operating transfers out (101,705) (7.15,040) (674,185) (8,768) (217,044) (30,785) :(1,247,527) Excess of revenues over (under) 17,738 397,058 43,752 (27,143) other uses 4,858 49,781 (540,340) FUND BALANCES - June 30, 1982 _ 22,794 630,963 71,500 192,359 4,170 921,786 ..FUND BALANCES - June 30, .1983 $N1$5L $_7.2..5Z� $gyp 623 $89,23a $5. $42-9u Cl 28 a 11 Big I'm CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON FEDERAL REVENUESHARING FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL _ for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 Variance` - original Favorable Budget Actual. (Unfavorable) REVENUES: ' $110,620 $106,545 $(4,075) Federal revenue sharing entitlements 500 18 (482) Interest $(4�1) Total revenues Variance - original Favorable Appropriations Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND Sy�,i i?0 $14?.705 $3 �k- r 29 4 a rumM1. 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON L STATE TAX STREET FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 rtes Variance - Original Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) ; REVENUES: = State gas tax $249,950 $260,091 $10,141 Interest 5,000 4,730 (270) Total revenues -254,950 264,821 9,871 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIATION 22,794 22,794 Total $277`.744 $2$7 Variance, - original Favorable Appropriations Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING TRANSFER TO GENERALFUND $ $52-7-U f 30 s CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MAJOR STREET CAPITALPROJECT FUND STATE14ENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for thefiscalyear ended June 30, 1983 Variance Original' Favorable Budget Actual; (Unfavorable) REVENUES: System development charges $125,000 $ 88,043 $(36,957) Interest 10,000 45,802 35,802 ` Total revenues 135,000 133,845 (1,155) BEGINNING'FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 630,963 630,963 FOR APPROPRIATION Total $765.963 $764.808 S L1) Variance Original Favorable Appropriations Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND' $765.963 $674.185 $91,728. i a 4 31 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the ;fiscal''year ended June 30, 1983 x a Variance original Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES: $18,500 $18,580 $ so System development charges � 1,000 7,926 6,926 Interest7,006 19,500 . 26,506 Total revenues BEGINNING F M, BALANCE AVAILABLE 71,500 71,500 FOR APPROPRIATION S�•o0o S9g.006 5�24�. Total Variance - original Favorable Appropriations Actual (unfavorable) OPERATING TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND' - y T 32 62 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON r COUNTY ROAD MAINTENANCEAND REPAIR FUND i STATEIAENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 'i C Variance - original Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES:' County maintenance and repair tax $532,000 $577,943 $ 45,943 Interest 20,000 36,159 16,159 Total revenues 552,000 614,102 62,102 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPROPRIATION 192,359 192,359 Total $Z'i4 359 SA06,46]. $ 6?_142 Variance - original Favorable Appropriations Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 5744.359 $21Z�44 ( 33 w CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON " ROAD FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 x Variance - original Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES: County road tax $75,000 $72,843 $(2,157) Interest 1,A00 1,704 704 `Total revenues 76,000 74,547 (1,453) BEGINNING BALANCE AVAILABLE 4,170 4,°170 FOR APPROPRIATION Total $8917Q SZE-Zl2 Variance - original `Favorable Appropriations Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ $ $ $ � _z 34 5 } SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND The Special Assessment Fund accounts for the construc- tion specific street and sanitary sewer projects tion and financing;of p ` which benefit property owners. The fund' s primary financing sources are assessmentsagainst owners of benefited' property'. Interim financing of projects is obtained by issue of general obligation improvement warrants which mature two years from issue date. Assessments, which become a lien against the benefited proPerty, are levied based upon the estimated cost of the pro- jects. The benefited property owner may elect to pay the assess- meat; over a period of ten years (or twenty years for parking facilities and for assessments levied after September 1971 semi'-annual installments. Upon completion of the project, general obligation ten-year and twenty-year serial coupon bonds are sold F in an amount 'equal to the unpaid assessments. 4_ OE CITY OF TIGARD, 'OREGON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND" 4, STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the fiscal year ended' June_30, 1983 Variance - Favorable Budget Actual Unfavorable) REVENUES: Collection of bonded assessments $ 72,890 $ 775,749 $702,859 `Interest on assessments 152,959 186,517 10, 82 Interest on investments 10,000 86,382 76,3382 Total revenues 235,849 1,025,648 789,799 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 91,433 222,854 131,421 FOR APPROPRIATION Total $ $2.2&8.5Q2 $� o EXPENDITURES: Bond principal: $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Bancroft #10 3,000 3,000 11 10,000 10,000 12 19;795 19,795 13 20,000 $ 20,000 1425,000 25,000 - 15 ' Total principal 79,795 34,795 45,000 �.., Bond interest: 360 360 Bancroft #10 2,516 2,516 _ 11 7,463 7,463 12 44`,444 44,444 13 15,235 15,235 14 41,672 41,672 15 65,797 65,797 16 Total bond interest 177,487 177,487 ' Total expenditures 257,282 $_3 _ $-Aa UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE70,000 Total $3222 262 Expenditures as reported above $ 212 282 Add - assessment project expenditures 2,642,758 Less - bond principal payments (34,795) Expenditures, as reported in the Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures and Changes In Fund Balancer All Govern- 52,870.245 mental Fund Types 35 ,. ENTERPRISE FUNDS These funds are used to finance and account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of sewer and storm drainage facilities which are supported by user charges. Funds included in this fund category are: Sewer Fuad Storm Drainage Fund eek` A; !MIASIMMM IME CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ENTERPRISE FUNDS J COMBINING BALANCE SHEET t June 30, 1983 A Storm s Sewer Drainage Fund Fund Total ASSETS: Current assets' $ 26,842 $43,555 $ 70,397 Cash and investments 152,384 34,033 186,417 Accounts receivF.ble 4,665 487 5,152 Property taxes receivable 28 62 90 Interest receivable 15,000 15,000 Due from other funds 183,919 93,137 277,056 : Total current assets i 2,709,095 2.,709,095 Fixed assets, net $� 986,15 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY: Current:'liabilities: $ 151,350 $ 151,350 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 4,373 $ 467 4,840 Due to other funds 1,795 487 2,282 Deferred revenue 10,310 10,310 Accrued vacation pay 167,828 954 168,782 Total current liabilities Fund egi:ity: 2,440,933 2,440,933 Contributed capital 284,253 92,183 376,436 Retained earnings 2,725,186 92,183 2,817,369 Total fund equity $93,137 $2.986.151 36 r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ENTERPRISE FUNDS i COMBININGSTATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND C:3ANGES'IN RETAINED EARNINGS ( for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 Storm Sewer Drainage Fund Fund -Total OPERATING REVENUES: $339,537 $128,195 $467,732 Service charges OPERATING EXPENSES: 234,282 23,221 257,503 Salaries and wages 64,564 ;8,834 73,398 Employee benefits 60,238 60,238 Contracted services;' 51,367 5,543 56;910 General and administrative and other !05,724 105,724 Depreciation „ Total operating expenses 516,175' 37,598 553,773 - Operating income (loss) ;176,638) 90,597 (86,041) NONOPERATING REVENUE - Interest 10,381 1,586 11,967 Net income (loss) (166,257) 92,183 (74,074) Add depreciation on fixed assets acquired by grants, entitlements, and shared ' revenues externally restricted for capital acquisitions and construction 92,984 92,984 that reduces contributed capital Increase (decrease) in retained (73,273) 92,183 18,910 earnings . RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - June 30, 1982, (330,570) (330,570) as previously reported Prior period adjustment - transfer of prior years' depreciation on certain contributed 688,096 688,096 fixed assets to contributed capital RETAINED EARNINGS- June 30, 1982, as restated 357,526 357,526 RETAINED EARNINGS - June 30, 1983 524 1�� $�2 �A 537_ti.� 3si 37 t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON` ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 r Storm Sewer Drainage` Fund Fund Total Working capital provided (used): In operations: Netincome (loss) $(166,257) $92,183 $(74,074) Charges to operations not requiring outlay of working capital in the current period - 105;724 105,724 depreciation Working capital provided from (used in) operations (60,533) 92,183 31,650 Additions to :fixed assets, net of donated assets of $584,425 35,143) -' 3( 5,143) Increase (decrease) in working capital $(95.E26) -$92.183 $ .3) Changes in components which increased '(decreased) working capital:' Cash and investments $(90,910) $43,555 $(47,355) Accounts receivable 49,336 34,033 83,369 Property taxes receivable 3,404 4873,891 Interest receivable (48) 62 14 Due from other funds 15,000 15,000 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (62,928) (62,928) Due to other funds 4,325 (467) 3,858 Deferred revenue, 11,455 (487) 10,968 Accrued vacation pay1( 0,310) (10,310) Increase (decrease) in working capital $ L49=) n` 38 re CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SEWER FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 Variance Original Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) REVENUES: 5350,250. $339,537 $(10,713) Sewer service charges 381 _1G,000 10,381 Interest 360,250 349,918 (10,332) Total revenues 138,766 111,7672( 6,994) BEGIN14ING WORKING CAPITAL $4�g p16 $461 Sf37�' .l) Total Variance - original Favorable Appropriations Actual (Unfavorable) OTHER FINANCING USES: Operating transfer out - General Fund Beginning working capital comprises: $117,752 Cash and investments 103,048 Accounts receivable 1,261 Property taxes receivable 76 Interest receivable 222,137 Total current assets Less: 88,422 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 8,698 Due to other funds 13,250 Deferred revenue 110,370 Total current liabilities Sjii .767_ Working capital - $445,595 Total operating transfer out, as reported above (35,144) Less capital outlay expenditures capitalized 105,724 Add depreciation - Total expenses as reported in the Combining , Statement of Revenues, Expenses and $516: 75 Changes in Retained Earnings (page 37) - 39 CIiY OF TIGARD, OREGON STORM DRAINAGE FUND =; -BUDGET AND ACTUAL STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES for the fiscal year ended June 30, '1963 variance original Favorable > Budget Actual (Unfavorable) . REVENUES: Service charges $100,000 $128,195 $28,195 1,586 1,586 ' Interest $,oo.o00 $139•�s� $z9�Z�1. a. Total revenues OTHER FINANCING USES: $�p0.QOQ $37.528_ Operating transfer out - General Fund t, z: 40 F GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT "GROUP This account group accounts for the fixed assets of the city other than those recorded in the Enterprise Funds. t Ty CITY OF TIGARD,_OREGON !' STATEMENT OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY SOURCES June 30, 1983 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS Land $ 371,430 Buildings 693,316 Equipment 320,049 Autos and trucks 162,077 Office';equipment 164,560 Library books 179,820 Total general fixed assets $1.891 .252 INVESTMENT IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS Balance, beginning of year $1,760,865 Additions were provided by: General Fund 172,570 1,933,435 Retirements (42,183) Total investment in general fixed assets „$1,891.252 41 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ' STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS - BY SOURCES {' for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 Autos and Office Library Land Buildings Ecruipment Trucks Equipment Books Total Balance, June 30, 1982 $371,430 $687,185 $276,978 $133,311 $137,456 $154,505 S1;760,865 � .a Adds ) Additions from General Fund 6,131 57,869 49,269 33,986 25,315 172,570 Deduct: i--- �14,798) 20,503) (6_882) (42,183) Retirements --- Balance, June 30, a�6 $ 90.049 $� $i 64.560 $i79.BZ0 $? 891.252 1983 $371 4�' S6 — — p 42 CITY OF TIGARD, 'OREGON STATEMENT OF'GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY { June 30, 1983' Machinery and Function and Activity Total Land Buildings Equipment General Government: Control: $ 3,628 $ 3,628 Legislative 16,666 16,666 Executive 5,750 5,750 L Judicial Total control r 26;044 26,044 Staff Agencies: 57;828 57,828 Finance 31,679 31,.679 Recording and reporting 5,816 5,816 Administrative officers and boards 7,545 7;545 41,421 Planning and zoning 41,421 Research and investigation 527;093 $ 55,079 $472,014 General government buildings Total staff agencies 671,382 55,079 472,014 144,289 697,426 55,079 472,014 170,333 Total general government Public safety: 261,678 1,171 75,224 185,283 Police'protection 22,309 22,309 Protective inspection 283,987 1,171 75,224 207,592 Total public safety Highways 222,983 2,300 39,286 212,940 222,983 222,983 Libraries 432,330 312,880 106,792 12,658 Recreation Total general fixed assets SL 82]. 52 S 430 $69j � $$26 506 43 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY June 30, 1983 C r General General` Fixed Assets Fixed Assets Function and Activity June 30, 1982 Additions Deletions June 30, 1983 General Government: Control: Legislative $ 3,144 $ 484 $ 3,628 Executive 15,812 2,442 $ 1,588 16,666 Judicial 3,859 3,190 1,299 ' 5,75r) 22,815 6,116 2,887 26,044 Total control Staff agencies: Finance 54,298 3,675 145 57,828 Recording and reporting; 14,461 17,.639 421 31,679 Administrative officers and boards 3,917 1,899 5,816 Planning and zoning 7,926 126 507 7,545 Research and investigation 35,137 6,482 198 41,421 General government buildings 527,093 527,093 Total staff agencies 642;832 29,821 1,271 671,382 Total general government 665,647 35,937 4,158 697,426 Public safety: 219,492 51,808 9,622 261,678 Police protection 22,946 7,899 8,536 22,309 Protective inspection Total public safety 242,438 59,707 18,158 283,987 222,598 41,927 9,999 254,526 Highways Libraries 194,863 28,337 217 222,983 435,319 6,662 9,651 432,330 Recreation Total general fixed assets $ $42,183 44 p OTHER SCHEDULES Schedules included in this section are: Property tax transactions and outstanding balances Bond and bond interest transactions - Bancroft Improve- ment bonds Future debt service requirements of Bancroft improvement bonds f it. oz r CITY OF TIGARD,- OREGON L( SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY TAX TRANSACTIONS ' t AND OUTSTANDING BALANCES t 4 for the fiscal year Ended June 30, 1983 ; c Add Add Property Property Taxes Taxes Levy as (Deduct) Receivable Extended Corrections: (Deduct) (Deduct) Receivable t June 30, By and Cash Add Discounts June 30, 1982 Assessor Adjustments Collections Interest Allowed 1983 1482-83 $817,642 $9,104 $722,215 $ 854 $22,888 $ 82,497 'f 5 661 34,665 2,954 37,345 ' 1981-82 $68,39 a 1980-81 11,001'. (107) 4,869 687 6,912 1979-80 3,860 (118) 1,671 429 2,500 443 397 (240) 1,380 1,574 1978-79 i y 1977-78 198) 50 26 359 and prior 581 _�— $85, 3 $$17.642 $ $764.850 $ ,SS3 $22.888 $1 Distributed as follows: General'Fund: $678,460 $ 77,516 t Current 42,197 46,782. Prior years' levies 124,298 Total General Fund 720,657 4,881 560 Capital Projects Fund Sewer Fund (sewer charges collected ' on tax roll and included in sewer 34,655 4,665 service charges) StoreDrainage Fund (storm drainage charges collected on tax roll and included in storm drainage service 4,657 487 charges) x $764.850 $�0.0�0 Total 45 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SCHEDULE OF BOND AND BOND INTEREST TRANSACTIONS r BANCROFT,IMPROVEMENT BONDS for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983 t HI Bond Transactions Interest Transactions Out- Out- Out- Out- standing '. standing standing standing �;. June 30, June '3D, June.30, 1983 Issue 1982 Original June 30, K , Issued Matured Paid.. 1983 1982 Matured Paid 360 $ 360 15;968 $ 6,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 2,516 2,516 Issued May 1, 1975 $ 57,840 39,000 3,000 3,000 36,000 . Issued August 1, 1975 463 $ 24 Issued November 1, 128,082 110,000 10,000 10,000 100,040 $ 24 7,463 7, 1979 Issued November 1, 374 795 374,795 19,795 19,795 355,000 1,626 44,444 42,494 3,576 1981 15,235 14,939 296 Issued September 1, - $ 184,664 184,664 1982 184,664 Issued'October'1, 538,600 838,500 41,672 41,135 537 } 1982 838,600 Issued October 1, 1,37 1982 1,200 65,797 63,836 1,961 1,371,200 1,371,200 $�95 $� z 4 464 $3.4.795 5 23� Sy�$4��i4 SI_Q $777.487 $17 74� $"_4 e F 46 _M In m m M o n N m I f`T5 �Mn O n In T I ( w v N N N N H T 114 m O. _ m M 61 N H O T. .. CO h IA V' N 4? H'O G "I .-1O ...0 C O O b O O O O O N 41 H N O O O : O O O O O p CD 0 �o N 0 O In N N 'O O In M C O O. .N•1 .-•I •y .h-n c. N y U N'H LI to N to O In 'D Cn tlyl I I T do N ti CO NW Ch+1 O O h O CO V m N Vl h CO h I. c!. M N ti y N~. OHI G O O O O O 41..Y L ni 00 m O t1 O O N' O O. ti ti h O 1 L M O I W W W uT'1 VNi M N N to t1' N N M N H O T CO 'h 10 co N ti. N H H H H y VI L J : O 0 00 O O O O O O 0 0 O O d..0 O O O O o O O O I OHI I CD Ln .•i ti M M N M O O I H O�y CO t0 M N �D COM 4 � p V1 H �D O M S O r O O O O O o dz o 0 1�•1 N I C p O O O O OWO .y-N O O O M C tos1' InT : .-1ri N N M M V'0 y ptn O M T v r m h M N o ZG to V] to -In In j L7 Fm`L G Ee F.q ti y •T H y p� W W Iii.W �'•'^ H I rll 0=PO4 O IIny Y h t0 d O O O O O O Ao o O o ,E u•ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U � ti U'1 N t!1 Ifl U.w m V 04 � OH H H H H H y In .�•fVNl tN+1 �•1 T S In YI 1"� r rj N q:l h o-Ojl y pppppp��1�1� p O II O O CO O O N aJ 410 � OCDOOOO O O O O O O O y}.p .. O O O O C C M M M M M M M M M M M M y N O 91 O N N O O N M H•V O O Cy S L � N voi 7 Cl u•1 O I N H CO O H O Wt N N h H d' N N N T ID m- N H O h In aJ CO h M . y N h 'DN H C:' Y N Cl h ID H �O CO h M rq O T VI N C ® N W N H �� N _ ID C) Cl 0 O O O O O O O O o O O O O p O o o O O O O O O O - O O O O H•V Cl to m h o co M O M M M C O O O O O - O In H H N r N COV N N N N M M M M O Y y G4 y O H N M N IO 1 0 H M1L.7 W •3 M�9'�T In NSD W hl+l9OTTOO H.•aN NMMO''�lA LC1 W IO[�hCO(OTCs OOO H O N O C3 / W O++d cO Oi O CO a)CO.��CO CO co at T A T�T TT T A T�T�T.�T a, IN N N tV N N N N .' eT•1.. N N H H H H N N H H .•i N 47 STATISTICAL SECTION qc. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION - BUDGETARY BASIS for the last ten fiscal years City-wide Support Functions Fiscal: and Year Ended Community Community Policy and CapitalDebt June.30 Services Development Administration Outlay Service Total = . 1974 $ 368,497 $ 306,537 $ 78,024 $,67,147 $ 68,506 $ 888,711 1975 500,381 ` 329,771 40,838 ' 74,565 65,013 1,010,568 1976 549,436 299,757 82,114- 117,791 66,924 1,116,022 1977 631,725 267,107 88,400 105,608' 69,774 1,162,614 1978 924,720 444,111 123,769 136,830 60,762 1,690,192 1979 984,687 328,701 143,343 135,088 54,598 1,646,417 1980 1,231,631 510,098 190,308 232,502 50,348 2,214,887 1981 1,398,867 871,638 208,062 638,894 61,827 3,179,288 1982* 1,591,208 1,113,210 282,349 551,917 75,425 3,614,109 Z983 1,527,913 1,126,758 154,184 367,684 212,282 3,388,821 *Information derived from Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports for all governmental fund types. : 48 wi-Now CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES BY SOURCE - BUDGETARY BASIS for the rlast:ten fiscal years C., Fiscal Licenses Inter'- Charges Year Ended Franchise and Governmental for Fines and Miscellaneous E Jnded Taxes Fees Permits Revenues Services Forfeitures Revenues Total 1974 $244,912 $ 71,660 $ 86,878 $; 362,876 $ 16,957 $46;169 $ 120,847 S 950,299 1975 150,794 86,505` 73,659 422,853 32,586 37,562 92,558 896,517 1976 156,704 206,755 112,323 465,117 23,181 26,305 105,577 998,962 333,327 1977 308,484 162,828' 211,053 489,211 46,808 22,615 92,328 1,120,466 1,602,155 1978 198,159 `166,236 359,524 658,901 65,989 32,880 1979 215,764 205,572 502,113 716,085 114,603 57,410 170,672 1,962,219 1980 ,577,121 256,366 -275,861 362,818 893,586 51,074 57,000 329,716 2,226,421 1981 287,157 348,596 379,121 1,179,130 65,612 56,177 261,328 3,346,091 1982 690,118 390,637 267,598 1,381,121 67,286 57,343 491,988 3 ' 1983 728,641 449,778 347,798 1,456,325 43,460 55,651 1,235,048* 4,316,701 CE *Includes special assessment collections of $775,749. Information derived from Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports for all governmental fund types. t s 49 WIN t CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS for the last ten fiscal years; a r: Percent of Percent of Total Tax Delinquent Fiscal Year Percent Delinquent Total Collections Outstanding Taxes , Ended Total Current Tax of Levy Tax Tax to Tax Delinquent to Tai , Taxes ''.June 30 ,Tax Le 'Collections Collections Collections :Collections Lew Lew e" 1974 $252,093 $232,214 88.60; $14,195 $246,409 94.02% $ 34,005 12.97% 1975 . 147,897 129,650 87.66 24,349 153,999 104.13 26,112 17.66 21,837 14.02 1976 155,806 138,839 89.11 19,551 158,390 89.68 16,623 31G,139 194-76' 33,550 10.25 1977 327,288 293,516 Q 1978 192,345 174,074 90.50 27,656 201,730 104.88 2277,790 12;22 ,179 11.01 1979 227,35? 201,349 88.56 17,123 218,472 96.09 a 1980 279,241 245,353 .87.86 21,819 267,172 95.68` 35,635 12.75 87.94 26,884 298,533 96.64 41,516 13.44 1981 308,904 271;649 1982 756,116 675,712 89.37 19,150 694,862 91.90' 85,411 11.30 1983 817,642 722,215 88.33 : 42,635 764,850 93.54 130,010 15.90 , n Effective July 1, 1980, taxes are levied as of July 1 each year and are payable in three installments, without interest, on November 15, February 15 and May 15. Interest is charged at the rate of 1% per month on delinquent axes. Tax--liens-are foreclosed after three years' delinquencies. Taxpayers receive a discount of 3% for payment in full by November 15 and 2% for payment;of two-thirds of the total taxes due.: Prior to July 1, 1980, taxes were,levied as of July 1 each year and were payable quarterly, without interest, on Noveriber 15, February 15, May 15 and August 15. Property tax collections do not-agree to tax revenues on the schedule of general governmental revenues by source', ource - budgetary basis for the last ten fiscal years due prin�arily tolanduincluded ininqent sewerhtax collectionsof thetaboveewer Fand arges and Storm Drainage Fund which are collected'through the tax rolls Information derived from Comprehensive Annual.Financial Reports for.all governmental fund types. ' � 9 50 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON _ f ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY ( for the last ten fiscal years Fiscal Public Year Personal Utility Ended Total Real Property Property Property June 30 1974 $119,643,509 $100,536,433 $11,473;860 $ 7,633,216 5 153,602,774 129,717,733 14,653,704 9,231,337 1975 187,368,142 160,424,482 16,038;,701 10,904,959 7 223;536,146 194,968,099 17,145,211 11.,422,836 197 266,097,883 234,272,679 18,733,299 13,091,905 197 7 ` 1979 325,258,171 269,512,146 20,361,151 15,384,874 1980 420,475,002 384,440,292 21,065,797 14,968,913 1981 490,359,257 452,209,070 22,605,561 15,544,626 1982 617,762,400 566,426,345 31,197,001 20,139,054 1983 686,199,000 630,046,800 33,540,700 22,611,500 All property is assessed as of January 1, preceding the fiscal year beginning the following July 1..- Assessed value-approximates estimated actual value of property. Source: Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. s . l 51 i d'nto dv Q]C,4'D c••.1 .Id tO c1'.�O tD Qt N O O d'm N.-J ( fb Oe! Y Y:Y .••�.� u c ro s E" N iCi u ~•s~. a N c .a •N u s�. Y.o , 4 Y V -'ri0 N'u N U W a: atr.i•o m ca o m A ir^ .ac ro .•�:�cr v�Wn M m.W N Jai s N w v ?+� 4 N 'C fC ro i '•'t N H m:N"-ri 70.E u a '..a u o`u.� u.� w..d•m to n o o tv to •r+1 ro•> y Vl tomNNN •"� C.U. 4j N EE 1Np U' wc4 U iroJ ki 'O ami a > ?'v.E i R�C a ti W t!f N®Nd'M car ro 10.+ w o o CA '-1 7.•� rto to tD+n N'd'V'to of Y C 4.0 Y `�•L . 0 UT ro YEN. L yv L b"O O•ti �'`` .•1 N L a W L C C a as ipi >.•.�Y Ivof C a •-+ +' LT.Y:W U O ti.•d N r N Out O •rCi 1~J NW b :L >. C � •N .•1 N r1 N N N N M m r 1J Y F w O ro+ t F N U L N to 06 >.> D. cz o u o ° lu u (]. WC.i Y 41 IU D -.o•r� u N d N a O H co •Y.� y -Y W• NOti at O'tD m t0 co �...� �.•i Y OtitO W W O W N aG�� 'a a ro ro N NNNm N NNmNm L ro.. m.. : Ca. a Or�•r:> � Ca• �O � � ^G E3 MA a A.'a u t oaNN ° � �•.aec ;°O Ln a ro U N lO M u'1 ct tD ul t!1 N >o N j v A +7.`.W> N W •N L C N ID r r�o m m m tf1 ,,..' �� a •Wt 3 a +rs x a�.cm w 's. - F0.4 j W Y I O N y C r W 1 O ro Y W Y O L N Y -elm >t{r]C a Qty y NNNM tiNMm.M tl1 r-=•1 O.•'E p ro V a H ars u 3 ro ro ro U Q W44 v O y a,N Y L L U ro N .-1 ro N a ro W W. L p Y •�V1 m to to.-f O m N tD ro v L•nl•rl N a F Q4 V.0 u �'7 cp tO tnr�i•mrmn O0 a•� W u L 3 >.Y y •O a m fn bI O-O N n m-N"-T ON •rO1 ,.od b.0. H a ro f•1 .y c.N N N-N N.-1 .••1 A O •>A o N N ul a Y a a A•N W E Aj A C R O N . Wo O N [;. N •N 6 O.N N t. vcn m In r.-t o+m Pa eP.-t N (p�1,.aa.aJ 1`cr •p u U to U Mr MIArn Ot 41 MO 'o•M W 1n d•t4•N o m o-m C Y lT•rl C ro a O ro Y t? U O Y ro a >•M C E't C1 ro aL+ a N O 1. 4ro1.7 of 9 ^O O O O CT u ?� .�•� a. T1 t�n.i y Q o�u tD..aevtDwvtnmN .C7 C11 t9 tnmtn M.-10tDNO �p Y O Ip0..O �7 CA. Y N CJ7I �r[rl N r•1 H n•1.••1 ep d' Y 4a�?:'•t N•M Y C N O o a L - '[}Ot U fes/ C C L L~ U w O•M n yNen.ti t6M a ej Om ? Q� (D•d•.n t19 W uS.r.+ Lpa.,,a- M d.~q C N tLl.E C V F tNll• N M b 9C E ,o W W _ 6 tYia A y a I ro - 6'!N •✓".YO Oral N M M N Y u �� a «s to aoreso a .NM 3,Aa y ro � aroi wo U 7 NaC rrrnrn a)m co an M '^ •3 yr W tTt at cn m m a+O+T at M W O M F•.•i.0 N t0 O p F u H v•H 3 3, aC u 2 in 52 !., t - e CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COLLECTIONS for the last ten fiscal years ' k 8 Fiscal Year Current Ratio of Total . ri Ended Assessments Assessments Collections Outstanding June 30 Due (1) Collected (2) to Amount Due Assessments 1974 532,000 S 32,000 100.0% $ 100,431 1975 32,000 32,723 102.3 142,534 30,000 28,141 87.9 113,014 1976 33,448 22,944 68.6 90,070 1977 25,000 26,328 105.3 63,741 1978 24,000 37,435 155.9 26,306 1979 66.8 224,101 1980 29,000 19,374 1981 37,.082 46,405 125.1 374,788 1982 32,000 61,068 190.8 2,067,732 1983 34,795 775,749 2,229.5 2,751,376 ) ` (1) This amount is equal to the principal due on Bancroft Improvement Bonds. bonds (2)' Represents collections of current assessments ects for whichnsuch bondsBancroft havemnotvbeentissued. as well as assessment collections on p ) Source: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports of the City. tzt. t ( P. 53 i 151 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON s RATIO OF NET GENERAL;BONDED:DEBT TO ASSESSED VALUE AND r NET BONDED DEBT PERCAPITA for the last ten fiscal years Gross' General Ratio of Fiscal Obligation Less Debt Net Bonded >Year Bonded .Service Net Debt o Net Bonded Ended Assessed Debt Out- Monies Bonded Assessed Debt-Per June 30 Population Value standing Available Debt Value Capita 1974 9,500'> $119,643,509 $139,000 $17,081 $121,919 .10% $12.83 1975 10,085153,602,774 118,000 - 18,680 99,320 .06 9.85 1976 10,226 187,368,142 96,000 19,729 76,271 .04 7.46 1977 11,114' 223,536;146 74,000 21,030 52,970 .02 4.77 1978 11,899 266,097,883 50,000 22,445 27,555 .01 2.32 1979 13,697 325,258,171 29,000 24,601 4,399 1980 14,855 420,475,002 20,000 27,698 (7,698) 1981 14,690 490,359,257 10,000 10,000 * * 1982 1983 Excludes Bancroft improvement bonds since these bonds are repaid from assessments against r` benefited property owners. *There was no outstanding general obligation bonded debt in 1982 and 1983. sources: City budget documents, Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports of the City and Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. I 54 NA CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COMPUTATION OF 'LEGAL;DEBT MARGIN ' June 30, 1983 ' ORS 287.004 provides a debt limit of 3% of the true cash value of all taxable property within the City boundaries: True cash value (1981-82) (1) $686`,199,000 General obligation debt limit 20,585,970 $2,889,464 Gross bonded debt Excludable debt - Bancroft improvement bonds (2,889,464) Debt subject to limitation Legal debt margin - amount available for future indebtedness- $ 20.585.970 (1) From Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. c e ) 55 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COMPUTATION OF OVERLAPPING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT June 30, 1983 Percent Applicable Amount Appli- Net Debt Inside City cable Inside Jurisdiction Outstanding of Turd City of Tigard Port o£ Portland $106,100,000 2.24% $ 2,376,640 1,610,000 9.31 149,891 WashingtonCounty 27,573,000 11.55 3,184,682 Unified Sewerage Agency _785,000 20.93 164,301 U.S.A. Metzger 165,000 48.14 75,098 Metzger Watez District 5,165,000 31.14 1`,608,381 Metzger Combined 'nater District 2,085,000 69.57 1,450,535 Tigard water District 990,000 31.49 ` 311,751 Tualatin Rural Fire District 4,560,000 2.64 120,384 Washington County Fire District #1 17,150,000 45.93 7,876,995 Tigard;School District #23-J 29,495,000 1.48 - 436,526 Beaverton School District #48 $7 q5 678.000 $177 755.184 r Source: ' Oregon Municipal Debt Advisory Commission. a 56 a' n CI'PY OF TIGARD, OREGON RATIO OF, ANNUAL DEBT,SERVICE EXPENDITURES FOR GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO TOTALGENERALEXPEtv'DITURES for the last ten fiscal }rears Ratio of Debt Fiscal Year Total' Total service to Ended Debt General Total General E Jnded Principal ` Interest service Expenditures Expenditures 1974 $52,000 $ 16,506 $"68,506 $ 888,711 7.7% 1975 ' 50,000 - 15,013 65,013 1,010,568 6.4 1976 52,000 14,924 66,924 1,116,022 6.0 1977 55,448 14,326 69,774 1,162,614 6.0 49,000 11,762 60,762 1,690,192 3.6 1978 45,000 9,598 54;598 1,646,417 3.3 1979 38,000 12,348 50,348 2,214,887 2.3 1980 * 1981 47,082 14,74'5 61,827 3;179,288 1.9 198242,000 33,425 75,425 3,614,109 2.1 1983 34,795 177,487 212,282 3,388,821 6.3 Note: Includes Special Assessment Debt. § Source: Comprehensive Anr_ual Financial Reports of the City. 'c c: 57 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PROPERTY VALUE, CONSTRUCTION AND BANK DEPOSITS 117 for the last ten fiscal years Commercial Residential Fiscal Year Construction(1) Construction(1) Ended Number of Number of Bank Deposits June 30 Permits Value Permits Value (in thousands)(2) 1974 7 $ 465,974 222 $'5,656,941 $ 36,522 1975, 19 983,500 148 3,782,622 54,548 1976` 38 2,804,650 390 9,708,691 54,231 1977 112 6,879,656 582 16,107,157 64,929 Z978 106 8,095,118 379 15,031,551 77,314 1979 69 10,877,291 657 24,000,387 90,3052 1980 131 15;619,615 387 14,861,284 101,799 1981 131 8,013,746 289 18,343;452 101,520` 1982' 85 2,918,475 196 11,679,358 98,558 1933 102 3,940,579 244 13,281,694 102,314 (1) From City of Tigard Building Department. - (2) From State of Oregon Department of Commerce, Oregon Banking Division. 58 pp `H l,- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS June 30, 1983 Percentage of Total Assessed Assessed Taxpayer Type of Business Valuation Valuation Pacific Realty Trust (Oregon Ind. Park) Real estate brokers $19,743,500 2.9% Tualatin Development Corporation Residential construction 12,185,100 1.8 F.I.G. 'Holding'Company Insurance 9,064,600 1.3 Duane company-(Fred'Meyer) Savings;and loan 6,133,900 .9 Portland Fixture Company Property management 4,060;100 .6 Western Foundry Foundry 3,875,700 .6 Expressway Development Company Property Management 3,847,900 .6 Joseph M. Fought, et al Steel fabrication 3,744,600 .5 Fought Company Steel fabrication 2,318,600 .3 Circle A Products Company `Metal fabrication 2,262,200 .3 Source: Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation, based on 1982 assessed valuation. 59 a CITY OF TIGARD, 'OREGON DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS for the lasts ten fiscal years (2) (2) Per Capita Unemployment Income (3) Rate (1) (Washington School (Portland Fiscal Year Population County) Enrollment Metro. Area) 1973 7,379 5,148 5,150 5.4 1974 9,500 5,739 5,585 6.2 1975 1.0,085 6,114 5,722 9.5 1976 10,226 6,907 5,691 8.7 1977 11,114 7,784 5,654 6.8 -- 1978 11,899r 8,800 5,643 5.2 1979 13,697' 9,649 5,966 5.4 1980 14,855, 10,935 6,256 6.3 1981 14,690 N/A 6,422 8.0 1982 18,000 N/A 6,561 9.9(est.) Sources of information: (1) Portland State University, Population Research « Census Center. (2) U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. - (3) Tigard School District 23J. Information regarding the Median Age and Education Level of the City population is not available. N/A - Not available. 60 pfi Bloom I CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICS f, June 30,' 1983 Date of incoa-poration 1961 Form of government Council —Mayor - Administrator Area 8.4 square:miles Miles of streets 59.29 miles Number of street lights 1,393 Police protection: Number of stations i Number ofpolicemen and officers 22 Elementary= Junior High` High'School Education (elementary only): Attendance centers 9 2 2 Number of classrooms 203 102 86 Number of teachers 134 79 74 Number of students 3,311 1,570 1,252 Sanitary sewers 63.3 miles` Building permits issued 377'permits were issued during fiscal year 1983 Recreation and culture: Number of parks Five parks, totaling approximately 73 acres Number of libraries 1 library Number of volumes Approximately 26,000 volumes - Employees: Classified service 44 C• Exempt 34 Information obtained from the various departments of the City of Tigard, Oregon. Y 61 i z j AUDIT COMMENTS AND DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS a 3 t f AUDIT COMMENTS AND DISCLOSURES REQUIRED By STATE REGULATIONS 5 Oregon Administrative Rules 165-30-100 through F, 165-30-295 of the Minimum Standards for Audits of in°cooperation pre by the Secretary of State , Corporations, p F with the Oregon State Board of' Accountancy, enumerate the finan- cial statements, schedules, comments and disclosures required in audit reports. The required statements and schedules are set forth in the preceding sections of t his ei�or� ne`�u" to our examination of such statements and and disclosures related % schedules are set forth following. t i, s; �Y m 62 WANO AUDIT COMMENTS AND DISCLOSURES I. Internal Accounting Control: we have examined the combined financial statements of the City of Tigard, Oregon for the Year ended June 30, 1983 and our report thereon, dated September 14, 1983, is included in a preceding, section of this report. As part of our examination, we have obtained an understanding of accounting systems and controls incorporated therein as required by generally accepted auditing standards. The purposeof gaining such an understanding; is to assist the auditor in planning the nature and scope of, the exami- nation of the financial statements. The process of obtaining such an understanding is more limited than a study and evaluation necessary to express an opinion on the system of internal account- ing control taken as a whole. Based on our understanding, we determined that our examination could be more efficiently conduct- ed without placing, significant reliance on internal accounting controls and therefore we did not -directly evaluate and test them. The nature and extent of our other auditing procedures were adjusted accordingly. Our examination of the combined financial statements would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selective tests of accounting records and related data. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system of internal accounting control of the City of Tigard, Oregon taken as a whole. However, based solely on the procedures described above, nothing came to our attention during our examina- tion that indicated the existence of a material weakness. For this purpose, a weakness is considered material if it results in more than a relatively low risk that errors or irregularities in amounts thatwouldbe material in relation to the combined finan- E ^ial statements of the City of Tigard, Oregon may occur and not be detected within a timely period. C' 63 C AUDIT COMMENTS AND DISCLOSURES, Continued I . Internal Accounting Control, Continued: This report is intended solely for the use of management and the State of Oregon, Secretary of State, Division of Audits and should not be used for any other purpose. II . Accounting Records In general we found the condition of the accounting records adequate for audit purposes. III . Compliance with Legal Requirements: A. Budget Compliance: The 'City has complied with the Local Budget Law (ORS 294.305 to 294.520) in the preparation and adoption of its budget and tax levies for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1.983 and 1984. B. Indebtedness: The bonded debt of the City is in compliance with the limitations imposed by ORS 287.004 and 223.295. C. Adequacy of Collateral Securing Depository Balances: We reviewed the records of the City for compliance with the requirements of ORS 295 regarding collateral secur- ing depository balances. During the year ended June 30, 1983 the City was in compliance with the requirements of ORS 295 64 AUDIT 'COD94ENTS AND DISCLOSURES, Continued IV. Programs Funded from Outside Sources: A. Federal and State Grants: We reviewed and tested, to the extent deemed appropri- ate, transactions and reports of the federal and state programs in which the City'participates. We did not consider: the scope of our audit engagement as requiring us to make a complete audit examination of each project and our audit opinion on the City's combined financial statements does not cover each individual grant. Each grant is subject to audit by the grantor agency and any adjustments may become a liability of the -`apppropriate fund. Based on our tests of the accounting records and exam- ination of deports to 'grantor agencies, we were, in general, satisfied as to the propriety of accounting for such revenues and expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1983, subject to any adjustments subsequently required as a result of audits performed by the grantor agencies. B. Federal Revenue Sharing: We reviewed and tested the City's participation in the Federal Revenue Sharing Program for financial compliance as prescribed in the audit guide issued by the Office of Revenue Sharing. The review disclosed no conditions which we considered to be matters of noncompliance. 65 ME AUDIT COMENTS AND DISCLOSURES, Continued { V. Insurance and Fidelity Bond Coverage: We examined the City' s insurance and fidelity bond 0 1983 We ascertained that such policies ® coverage at June 30, appeared to be in force. We are not competent by training to . state whether the insurance policies covering City-owned property in force at June 30, 1983 are adequate. VI . Cost Accounting System: ; Our review of the City's cost accounting system disclosed E; no substantial noncompliance with the Cost Accounting Guidelines , developed by the; State of Oregon Executive Department. _r. 66 Via' 10 , MIN IM r y '_"� x l rz .,.•, ' - � �:�..�r,�"p.'"F2r r r�,r:�;''"� � any ".` '�. � �m - i x?t i a } s .M � k t� pr r PIONEER s. go RNI� 5 O 1 Iv.€-'��i ��r fey�,� »`� �► �" � n �,.��a�� `j" ��, M� .��ay«t >Y � y;��-ca�.` #. ,`.�}`i w, CITY OF TIGARD, ORES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OCTOBER, -1983 CITY COUF=L Wilbur A. :Bishop, Mayor Kenneth' Scheckla Ima Scott John Cook Tom Brian CITY AMUNISTRATOR :.. .Robert W. Jean FINANCE DIRECTOR Jerri L. Widner PREPARED BY Thomas J. Picco, Administrative Intern a z ro, I. TABLE OF CONMNTS PAGENO, I. TABLE OF CONTENTS II. INTRODUCTION III. GENERAL GOVERNMENT A. YEAR 1 B. YEAR 2 C, YEAR' 3 D. YEAR E. YEAR '5 IV. PUBLIC WORKS - SANITARY SEWERS A. YEAR 1 B. YEAR-2 C. YEAR '3 D. YEAR 4 E. YEAR' 5 V. PUBLIC WORKS - STORM DRAINAGE A. YEAR` 1 B. YEAR`2 C. YEAR" 3 D YEAR 4 E. YEAR 5 vi. PUBLIC WORKS PARKS A. YEAR' 1 B. YEAR 2 C. YEAR 3 D. YEAR' 4 E. YEAR 5 VII. PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS A. YEAR 1 B. YEAR-2- C. EAR 2C. YEAR 3 D. YEAR 4 E. YEAR 5 VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS & REFERENCES s, R C Ct± C ' C' C C E a 3+ � z II. INTRODUMON a The Capital. Improvement Plan (C.I.P. ) for the City of Tigard is a five-year { capital projects, plan for the period FY 1984-85 through FY 1999-89, designed to be easily updated annually thereafter. The C.I.P. is intended to forecast t major capital project budget requirements for expansion, improvements, and . = replacement of the local delivery systems of the City. The plan is to be used � in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tigard as a E blueprint for the future. The C.I.P. is a fluid document that does not ¢ , address the specific engineering details of an individual capital improvements _ project, but rather acts as an overview framework from generalized cost data that can be altered as more detailed future project information dictates. The C.I.P'. is designed to facilitate financial and operational planning of° capital improvements for the following departments and divisions of the City: o General Government: o Civic Center/Office Space Rental o Vehicles and Major Public Works` Equipment o Computers and Software Programs o Other Major Equipment and Library v � f o Public Works: o Sanitary; Sewers o Storm Drainage o Parks o Streets THE PLAN The basic' methodology in the development of the Capital Improvement Plan was that of determining the City's needs, establishing priorities, and analyzing _ the City's ability to finance the needed improvements. The compilation of facts and figures was done through the resources of the City staff. The K various elements of the Plan are designed so that they may be either accelerated or pushed back as the growth rate alters or as circumstances dictate. HOW TO USE THE C.I.P. ' t The C.I.P. is broken down into divisions of each Department (i.e. Public Works Department: Operations-Wastewater Division). Subtabled -according to division are the five ' years of the program. So, to find an item of discussion, identify the Department and Division and located the year involved. _'" f _ BASIC ASSUMPTIONS OF THE PLAN o The City of Tigard will continue to experience rapid, steady growth over 'the. ' next five years, with possible significant variations due, to annexations of adjacent unincorporated areas (Walnut _ Street inlet, Metzger/Washington Square region). The probability and timing of these annexations are difficult to predict. For purposes of-this plan it is projected that the current FY 83-84 population of the City of Tigard, at 18,500, will increase by 38% to 30,00 in FY 88-89, including annexation of the Metzger/Washington Square area. (See graph following.) o The assessed valuation of the City of Tigard is expected to rise from r f its current level of $775,325,000 for FY 83-84, to $1,035,000, by FY 88-89. The represents a 6% increase per year, which is 'consistent with of historical' trends. The possibility future annexation of the Metzger/Washington Square area would have a significant impact on the 3 assessed valuation of the City of Tigard, and require some reevaluation of project prioritiesand revenue` projections. O : The ..projected rate of inflatir�n over the five year term of the CrI.P- will be 3.5% , per year. However, estimated costs for projects identified in the C.I.P. are expressed in current dollars, to allow for easier project comparisons. To coverany legal, accounting, ve services, and .to provide a contingency in engineering or administrati case construction costs are higher than anticipated, an additional 20% was added above construction costs to each project. i } { �. � � , � �� ti ems• .. _...._. __. r,,..e� ,� �..• ,�, tet.�». w, ti„ .� �,.��, e . :. �.,,v. fi � tt a � : a Yx,�sSn i ew 5, 5',r tx >t'w �,ttb �� rr � �ro�r-�4�_�t4, x��,r_ 1� ,��.zz� �-t?_ afr,,. � m.,, 5 ��': � �+.x,�, ��,,.; _ t�. .ix'�Tz?�v.��- �•.` '� � > �r 3 x, ..:r�� .. �+a �s��._._., �?r,. ..�;:s�5' �.”: .�€�:# ^"w,� s a; ,s_ .,u y.�. ..t`�.�.�^ t -�� ,. ,i� �*•t,_ �*,� �.� � -�'4.r�vs.% �-� r,��x�-, ��,t;�<. x`t :'�",-�-, -....� ,:- '� ,-a,�'. �,�sS-.., ,3�._..,.,.°z v,�=,b"#:. . .G��-..a•�,�::. rs-'.x �` '.�d'°�i•�.§h�..�. ,�tsr.. �+`�"'Lt' =d��-`.'.�- ;`��1.,�Z� �5-..Tsc. .�� .S'��'ea..:,c +x �"t� .�r�w$�. �, m.. ,,-tt-.. t�`w ,y�".'?. .-a-,'�^3 �"`b'�A'.� o-.�. 'tr�`.. q fi�'�'�-.`3'n.;Y+..yrs-._• �a•'L"�u,s�: F '3'r'r 'v� tea:; '�y..,q.s'->'n,L ,,�w,';a 's�,:�e�• �ar��:=zm`z:s�°'S-�"+�x__ •;:... �`�&��S'`, ``,-•_�'.'}��td�.�•�1- -s��w-?e•T�:i.#x��'att �mn=��m..,+�..3.``,tsF� �"-_$ � '��i�k �,��`�'-�'s�ts�'s�.::''�«.Oxy':r.�:'�`"'� �m�s�.r4` ��" �.'., �„�'4.�,. F o co m O O o 0 0( 0 0o M o rn C= Q o o 10 o co O m —� en an m N 10 O 10 O m C Qm 10 - N N C: M ON cl M N .-F h C t0 � � oo � In o' o of � co LO 0 0¢ to O r MI Ol m — C <r C7, 0 W } N N .-+ to >- LL Id+ Oft coO O O :O� -.co O O O 0� O O O p:. O 0 p� C I O L LO C 0- co �n Ol h ".F m m Lr) N t C o m ¢ to rn M 0) m .-t . . W >- N m t0 co ti m 0 r L, Ir LO �o 4A. r ' a O c° Ch 01 h O O 00 00 O h m m 0 m O LO cA as G m .•� to C O O O <LLO7 LO W co -tn h q M t0 to C t0.. to 'CA to H W ?-, h .-� C m C to h C t0 .-.� U r W.. C 10 m rr N C 01 1 of M C C :4Fl W > 1 O O h 0 h O O O h H CaOn OI m O 0 O O O N t;_ N L:. O O O Ln to m Ln co W - N ON h m LO an N h h t0 N >- W C m an N co Ln O N C to ffi y3 EF} 44+ if), LO m O O m 0� O O O O 0 t� CL CD O O N C w O O O L ¢ LO t0 h rn co 10 LO 01 co W W to — O? N h 10 d\ .� to N o N y X m O > X 0r6 ci o o L 41 m c o � o M > ck:i w c N H L m A w L d m p al 3 M -� F- m r0 o. c c, c .N to W U cv— � W � 3. rda D mi d OL H ix C F-' H c O L L O F- 0. W .t a t Cg cn 0. 4J C co S] + 00000 000000 OOOo0 0000 c' � O00 OO 0N C O O 00 0 O OO PNO � OOO , p , .--� m N to p N m O C..h ul O, � -:r o a, ,r 0 �. r ,tt O Dti V ,n .O ,p Q, M CJ, rn.N h CO '!� �' w O, d O F—, h ,D tD QS O N N ,t7 h m.ct ,D D, en ,n h N P N ,D cD N N m N Ef} p I O 0 00000000 OOOo Op 0 0 0000 LO 0 � 0 o � u! 0 p 0 0 O 1 O,r ! ,1 D 810 cD oil O ,n N oh m I � N 01 r-hO ,n ,Dm ON m Nw r !l z.. r LL Oft Eft O pp o of 0 00000 0000 a oC)00 co 00 000 co 0 O '.o O O aq- LO 0 0 0 �r h 0 O O 0 0 4 i O 1 i - h tt7 D ,n m .+ m u'! en O s N ,n ,n N C PW O Ou Ln ..,C a' h '_'' m 0 m O N m :a+ N N I .•+ ,-' rt t .+ a m rn r+ m ;D 4 C17 [.t) r N m 4 r y k n Eft a 0 0 0 O o 00 0 P mco 0 0 0 m O G 0co in w 0 0 o h N 0 O 00 O 0000 co Lo Lo I -H tD t» O O o7 o M i O o O N O C w V o P p LC) '.0 u) as ' �.Q Lo `,Nb I '~a I mo,-, W r N Y lL r EfP I Eft Eft P - sY 00000 O O O O 00 O Cn �D O 00 0 0 h O h 0 0 0 0 0 d1 uC 0 O 00 0 - N Nm! 0 m0.. f OQ' P O2oD 00000 nN ! C ! O 00 0 . . mO � � m NN000tf) 0 tY_ ul� � r 4, O ra r h M P h m m Lc Cn m u7 ! M ! N O t0 1 h m a tf1 m C I �•t O, h M C 2 C co .-� .-i N en r N LU I r LL 1 E 4"1"' i ! , [Y H _ O O 0 w Q 00000 h O P 00 0 O 00 0 00 ,0000 tt ,n 00 A .,y 1 0 00000 N c ,o O O 0 0 0 0 000 N N O Lt'> O o 0 0 o 0 I oD N 5D N aD %0 p N h rdl O 1 m o0 cj% tD O D4 Lo a0 W �'-'� ,D tf1 �. LC) co m m ,-s O, � rn I o•e to I M N Ct p, �..e � N•a r �( Eft 4fi, EPr rn 4-) L O � - 3 7! C a' V mT fri 1 H C C - F- 3 C 4j M -r+ O E -Y- CD L O O. 7 -0 a O O E O a d C m L '*" C f8 � L L 'O L Y . F- f4 U- Lt.. C cr \ to u.. C_<L N C •.+ L I sY O C Rv L C N '!3 .-, W rd d o r-. 4J 0 m 7, 7 O Vi 4�.. e7 � a t!i m `n 0 a- {€ N Rf rn r6 � L r Cr L r+ L L C a .--e �.+ 4j .•� 0 .-+ Q L O d C co L to a e� C 3 U-. €6 N 7 C L C i� 4J 3 ? > fl t6 E V•• O L a L W L eti 4y ..a Qe •.a eL y O +� 4J i2 ry v W O C.) •.a G N ®! W -V L O +� N L .�., xL CL Rj act GC7U) U) a E0 -r- 0 !- H Curse: of �O+ � Vstna � [9 .0 rd C7 � � € p C7 ui W B uJ'OO �°0000 p +-+ 000'Lf) 0'0000000tn + N u) 000 O: w 0 0 0.N 00 Ln 0 0 0 0-,n N cc- 'D 0 O:ut-w ,o a,.ut Om.0 ar - 'o 0.0 w a,>0 r� 0`w u, s_cn w O O Q' n r� .-� O w ,n ,0 n"m a,p r� O m N O a a 0 0 in O, Lf) - w •-+ C .-i fl, w N w 0 Lo Vo w ,Ot0 N Q, O, N w..0 N0 r- N .-..M ar .-! a ,o !� 0 •�.:N 1"..--."a � ,o'.,o O o, 4F�.. 00 0 0 0 0.O O 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O 0 0 In u o O C 0 0 0 O � 0 m 00 ,O m w - w - _ 0 0 rl. N 0 O `m N.0 Lo a) m � LO Ln t3? O.O O LO LO w o+ a% h. a, w m..0 1f) �:RC1 a L( a c- Lf] �!) ko 5 � w N,CV 1 0.�.0 ..-e:N rn rn..�-+ 0, 'D in (7, I...m .-� %0 'o r,:.-, O m N r N N .-� ,N N w to LcJ } 1 t0 I Is 44+ 443 C G O 00 0 p. 000000 C 00000 0 U 0 00 0 O O O u± us O O O 00000 0 w -0 00 C C C ,n N rl p 0 -.n 0.0 0 0 0 a w r r 1 0 0 C� ,o w O O a a, m rn N d u? Ln N e m Is w ¢ = w I N 1,O N { �_ m n co a, M r, m i .. I m N m m 0 O E ¢ f.. O, m N.N N .-� .-+ NLn w m O >- LL Oft Efl EFY cr, uj OC07 O r, 0000000 00000 0Lo0LnLo.0000000 Lo LO LOCO 000Nh O Lo au> NN0OOLnr- Nm O & c w; 0 , a, mawOOOa { ONmm o ut Z a to 0 us w ,n I { a ko m 0 Lr± O Ln LO Oj C N a, m w cr 07 N N N C` N C ., C_: . .y N N .-r N w N O, z UJ} Lri.. N m C N 4fi fH LL ER r a LO Ln 00 O r-- 0000000000 O Ln in'OOONr� O0O NOMipOp0000OrN OOO ±O 0co hN m N I. to O O t0 C O1\ m r\. r\ N N N U) �-+ C CO P0 w to O, %0 to a. tft N rn 0 U - I w r\ t0 m N m kD N �o p ,0 w m O l0 t0 O, N U ¢ Cy N .-+ - w cn m N N .-+ .--i .-. N m LO UJ r N N .1 c14 LO Lir r C w L+- in00 rn000 O 0 L 0000000 Ln f\ N00 r, 000 O O, OCON 00000u? 0r� rn L ko00 I wwr� 0 Lr) ,OOaID ,D000nON Ow , ' I m000Ow :no, w ") r, ,om ,o0,nLOOwuOm0 w � m w � O I O0r, � a, akoN -� w Lo cNNa, 0 ; C\ l0 ,-1 .-� .--, vi C f N G: Y 0 6 L V m > re x m cn p o ~ I- 0 a -1 a � � 0 h a m & 1 O H U T W t1 k C !rJ 0 rn O T ? p L O r. H .+, 0 O cn � t 0 a. LLL .-� Lim.. O v� 0 �p � W C N C7 fl W O I ^�= m W N = W .I., i Q L L E W W +, J 0 L m .� N 0. d/ Ld - a., W 4, NC W r$ H N N L W d-, C S= W W W N H . 1, t- ^r'.-L 0 O L 0 L � �4 -) U C 3 LL G L M : rd x 3 L > 0 L U G W W 0 4J ad y G L - W r6 W H .N cr a W cn 0 c -j m O - ¢ C7 cn to U) (n to 0 CD cc cn o. Q J O J Cf) {O^ S CAPITAL IMPROV PROGRAM PLAN! PROJECT DETAIL ' PROJECT: (The name identifying project) DEPARTMENT: (The applicable _ DIVISION: 'Department & Division) PROJECT LOCATION: (Where the project is located) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: other g of the project,' reason of the need, and any (A detailed description amplifying information relevant to the project.) j x-x#-x X#-H-x�(-H"H-x#-H-x##-x-x�t-rE-?HE-x-H-x##-X-X#H rE x�(-X#�t-x-x H x-)(-x#-XN x x•H-X�f-X#>f=�f X-H-)f-D(-x X-x HH X X#H H-x-H H lEH-H-X x X ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: (Cost projections for the projects) G #-H.x-1F-x3E-1{-x-H-xiE34 H-H-x-X#x-Dt-H-x-x•x-x-x-X-H-if#l<#-x-x#-x x-H-xi(-lE3(-x-X-H"D(Dt H x-x X-x-M-x-x-H x-x-H-x-x-H-H x-Ha(-K Hx-Xi:H-fFx H#`Ya x x# ' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY-85-86 FY Bb-87 FY 87-88 FY 88_89 TOTAL . _ Federal $ (Revenues to be received from Federal Grants) ____ State $ Revenues to be received from State Grants _ City $__ 2evenues to be received from City sources (taxes & user fees., s - $ (Revenues to be received from specifically identified $ sources (County, special-as$Sessments eetc.)___ $ -- TOTALS #aE-H-x-DE#-x-x-H-H-xiE-x#�Y•ji#x-x-H-H-x'1(�f-x-3(-x-x N#-H##-x x#-H-H"x-x x DFiEH-x H#-x#H H-H-M.H-H-xa4'.t-H-x-H-H#3(-x#-x;(-H-Hi?-H-x-x-H3E-x-x tE � . i LOCATION: c. (A map to locate the project within the City.) :Y i z W n C. r• Z-- F O ^ ON J n fr o zx w � o • .. � rn¢ a my Q zo z Ll. z a io Fi .: W. Z4. ,n G� z zn v C O O 22 IR F >• N J G V w V � ¢ O w •c W N W ¢ ,¢ii Y W 9 w: F z p W ` v ` f 4 0 tn.E• W 00 6 U S ? O N 7 c N n O`� 00 on IDU . '� OOO ^.aS N ua F I wNnNUUU ^ Q ` t. _ W m O ¢ W n w �0 o n z z z c:. z.<fp z0 o I z ZO `o. ^..,. a o CSA S U E-< rgiz ti .:. W O rsfi a. x :n-. .• U.' .I> FO z 0 S z x f..¢ –U �:: - - U C O R Sw O N 7 Q ¢ w N Z } p Z O a ym 0 p H < ¢ o. 04 UCj � Z a p '�r� ¢ IV-) tCJ r C x L m .. S� s o ,Z w > z at, W i Q 2 OU 3U Z 6 d5 .ena (] ?p UNU z z _ r W -W � W - 14— - Uu ;: 2U ¢ waa UG r_ x • O 94 a • e + E+ c e o o U o • + >•Z N p 00 a.V) a � �Wi ow ff.- ¢zpi•�€= s � -3 "rw4wA o o e .. � C O 4 W e o e o •4co 0,0 H aH y w z � ¢ o + Y� SNJ •O U 1. O fn J > N N a j r< o 0 Z H Id) W W N O • • W N + c Us-^ •C S S Y S Z J:c s tt N PC ^ 4 oc AR > i O H w z Ln ,� t ,V ZZ 2 w 2 > H W -j 4 .-1 z _ �, /� Md� `•" ZO W w om ui O o W ¢ U ¢ H ti > 3 /\ O a N N a V e H w F w X > > W o < z zW H IE- OCZ U W..U a k fn U w W U ry ..7 a.,. P U.O E' pj w'�J aJ.aWYC a 3 o" X N I, a 3 0 3 E 0 W + O1. 0 F ¢ 0 F W.a K U 1. 0 S w J 03 V H 02 k F U> wo J r ME- O. V z..W ¢ w (ttjU� 39R Z 4 a 4, F ¢N ¢ ¢ 3 O< .Fi F Yw aa. �, W wh w g... .aw V � i i r i K W rW. �� a ¢p , ( ��.z z v V M y W 0 U w 3® 2 r UH F 1.04Yfl44 O t nw.> ¢ J z av M 2¢ W H V >10 0 a ' EE.. e( X X x W 2 w u� U w fs.N 1.. VI V O O 4 O R U ti R z t V N 4 .p cc 2HawX h F N d rw /p+a yA z � O JR .] KJ oRO WZN S.. In z qq f R ¢ w w W f. .2 00 W O u u u EA OH Q W> w a a s V O O f HwW W V W J fl J K g 0 02 W O V U L �. h h h Q 7J W01..1.. 4.. K w2zi e¢w e¢w 0¢w• WW0 p J m in I. fl� "z 3 ��"09�0 00Cn DO in I. Wfl•i 0. 7 .. t k; rJ��.\•. CITY , NEKTON 1. I� C `UNINCORPORATED LIMITSd UL— BEA \I- �� - Yj AA Al � UNlNcbRPORAT ID _. t��`r�� 5✓ �f `� �'°. J � ��.. �� Al- rte511 ' . rlI.. IF 7" TUAL A iN asD U R�._• ,� v 'l TUALATM �n . �� E{{ E k ,t .' � �� [z � �� . � _ . �, �� . f s IIl. GENERAL,.GOVERNP1ENT CIVIC CEffER/OFFICE SPACE t � Civic Center/Office Space Rental r A major project of importance to City ,government in particular, and the City of Tigard as a "community entity in general, is the purchase of a building for M1 the proposed new Civic Center. The CivicCenter, located adjacent to the developing Fanno Creek Park, would be a major focal point of community pride for the citizens of =Tigard. Relocation of government agencies to the new b Civic Center would allow -consolidation of government activities under one roof, and relieve cramped, inadequate offices currently located in separated buildings. ' The benefits in long-term cost -savings over continued renting or new 'construction would be rsignificant` — based on a guaranteed fixed annual payment of $255,000, and a purchase price of $2,200,000. In addition, the ; current City Hall, adjoining the proposed Civic Center (Textronic building) would be freed for rental purposes, further decreasing the annual payments. The ,allocation of space in the proposed Civic Center would be as follows: Library - 15,000 sq.ft. (45%); Police 10,924 sq.ft. (35%); Administration — 7,250 sq.ft. (20%); total space 33,173 sq.ft. (100%). Space is also prCene Center for public meetings and hearings. Although funding for the Civic Center includes "a minimum amount' for remodeling, including mechanical facilities, c areas, additional funds will be wall partitions, and ;some carpeting in publi : required for relocation and refurnishing.; This need is most '.evident in regards to the Library, currently utilizing inadequate, insufficient furnishings. The Library,, therefore, is projected to receive 70% of the $100,000 allocated for Civic Center furnishing, including bookshelves, reading chairs, public tables and chairs. g Vehicle and Major Public Works Equipment Acquisition and" Replacement k , Basic to the continual, day—today operations and maintenance of City business E and facilities, is the purchase and replacement of vehicles and public works equipment. police vehicles are special edition automobiles that receive a great deal of wear and tear from frequent usage, high mileage, and occasional driving. Their suitability hard for continued police use is severely limited after two years, at which time they are sold or recycled to general, administrative fleet use. A recycle and replacement schedule is devised to gain the greatest possible utilization of each vehicle (see schedule following). i Public Works equipment is also subject to depreciation and wear in servicing and maintaining the City's streets, sewers, storm drainage and park systems. Much of the fleet of Public Works equipment is old, though still operating. s However, parts costs and availability become less acceptable after equipment is over ten years old. Practically all of the equipment and vehicles used by F e (1982), will have to be replaced public works crews, except the Case BackhoY Quer the next five years, at a cost of $450,000. Trade-in values, and availability of suitable used equipment may alter this figure downward ' somewhat. s and Software Pro rams As the volume and complexity of City business increases in tandem with the .f growth and development of the City, it is important that appropriate tools and uctivity support equipment be provided staff to maintain and enhance prod gains. Computers are vital tools in ensuring the capability of staff to continue to provide efficient, timely processing of City business. Increasing usage of the existing computer system by more knowledgeable staff personnel, has 'already pressed the current capabilities of this system to .its limits of productivity. Therefore, to ensure greater data storage capacities, faster processing speeds, better formatting .options, and the addition of necessary; work stations/terminals, it is 'proposed that the City WANG OIS model computer be 'tr-ided in on a more versatile model. This new model would 'utilize a VS proce,sing system - a significant improvement over the current OIS processing' system. This major CPU` hardware improvement ' should provide sufficient computer ,capabilities for an extended period of time, past the current five year CIP Plan. Some needed improvements that would be expected to flow from acquisition of a new CPU system would be the capability of adding on additional workstations and support equipment. It is proposed in the CIP to add four (4) additional word processing terminals, two (2) data processing terminals, one (1) cashiers' terminals and assorted software to accommodate increased work loads and staff access. The Police' Department and Library would have direct access to the main computer for the first time, greatly enhancing their productivity. To 'provide greater operational ' latitude to the Engineering Division, it is proposed that the current WANG MVP model be sold/traded, and, a used LVP operating computer be purchased, for approximately $8,000. With such a computer, the Engineering Division of Public Works is in position to update and enhance its computer-assisted operations to handle a wider range of engineering/design-oriented work assignments. Greater efficiency in resolving often time-consuming civil engineering projects is an expected result,of the utilization of new equipments acquired through an incremental, component purchasing program of approximately $68,500 over ,the next five years. Used in conjunction with the developing Field Control Network program, the new equipment would facilitate map updating and systems overlays for more up-to-date information and control of important planning and public works issues. More in-house control over engineering projects would result in greater productivity gains with fewer staff increases. Other Major Equipment And Library Major equipment purchases are proposed to enhance the productivity, quality, and safety of City staff and operations. A high priority project achieving all of these purposes is purchase of an Emergency Communications/Radio Dispatch System for the Police Department. This project would replace the current antiquated and inadequate radio dispatch system, with a modern, reliable microwave radio dispatch unit. The new system would provide direct monitoring and communication with adjoining agencies, as well as dependable contact with officers in the field. Enhanced responsiveness to citizen requests for assistance, and greater safety for officers would be expected benefits of the new system. Purchase of the proposed Radio Dispatch System, with a back-up tape-recording system to ensure accuracy of calls, would cost $68,460. The replacement and acquisition of office equipment is another area of importance in maintaining' and improving staff productivity and public service. Because City business is important and timely, it is necessary to periodically replace and update basic office equipment. Purchase of basic office equipment over the next five years will require approximately $20,000 in expenditures .' As . the City continues to grow and City' documentations expands, maintaining records management and control , becomes increasingly important. Therefore, to "ensure records management and control,, maintain t< security of historical documentation and minimize storage 'demands, it is microfilm/microfiche system of camera and three proposed that a reader/printers beiacquired for approximately $15,000. Improvements to the 'duality of service provided at the City Library are proposed to ensure this institution assumes a position of cultural 'importance nity. Relocation to newer, larger quarters in the new and pride in the commu Civic Center would be one strong endorsement of this commitment to quality " cultural services in the City. However, maintaining this commitment requires a .continual updating of new booksand materials, as well as the replacement of older volumes of merit, worn from usage. To continue quality services, it is proposed that $30,000 be allocated annually to the purchase of new books and materials in order to maintain a net expansion of 5% in library stocks and replace older volumes { ` p F, EE 6' yY w { { f> r k t l[p i' 1: c t� 3 i { Vehicle Acquisition And Replacement Schedule S T ex enditure from the City' General Fund is the A major recurring p o patrol vehicles and General acquisition/replacement of. Polio Government/Public' Works vehicles. The Police Department currently operates seven (7) patrol vehicles 0 supervisor's unit, 4 patrol offier's , units, 2 is canine units); two (2) motorcycles; and two (2) .used, ;unmarked detective's � le units for 'investiogftao eoperatedlPolicer patrolnment vehicles recycled et of sdown composed es-+ta. ely previously after their average two (2) year life span. This fleet numbers seven (7} in total (I Administrative unit, 2 Building Department units, nvehicles Works ' units). The current replacement/relic cycling procedure for patrol purchase two or three new police-edition automobiles yearly as nee converdsionTof older vehicles replaced are recycled in one of three ways: C ) offer patrol car to canine unit (additional two year lige span provided); (2) of vehicles to General' Government' Fleet utilization; or (3) sale of vehicles by auction, with°proceeds deposited in the General Fund. sfactrily in hpast, Whereas this replacement sche�duln moyhave worked ulat on, d nsity,; and goeographictdi stance as the City continues to gra pop atrol through annexation, additional manpower and vehicle needs will create greater handing problems. It is projected in the C.I.P. 88 89 that at Continuing east ten to)replace vehicles will need be in operation yearly by ly would vehicles on a yearly basis will severely imit capital purchases of other necessary equipment. 'While therppatrollacemen needse of ethe1policecDepartment, it i continue to meet the professionalprovide little versatility in would be increasingly expensive, and p incorporating the needs of the General Government fleet vehicles. An alternative acquisition/replacement schedule is proposed that would allow overall .replacement costs to be lowhile weredl This syvehicles stem iato opolicest spatrol bn stili maintaining ready availability of quality dut?es, as well as providing access of General Government divisions to newer ition vehicles. This method would be based on the pureaar s� oserv5 wl ng the poli ce and ppatrol vehicles over a period of three (3) y at a savings to the City, Government Fleet uses s for five (5) years, over the current method, of $27,530. A comparison of the current and proposed vehicle replacement schedule is provided below. CURRENT ACQUISITION/REPLACEMENT SYSTEM FY 84_•85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 # of patrol units 8 9 9 10 1.0 #� of fleet units 7 7 7 7 7 Purchase 4 @ $10,635 3 @ $11,000 3 @ $11,400 4 @ $11,790 2 @ $12.,200 $42,540 = :$33,000 = $34,200 = $47,160 $24,400 ' l motorcycle 1 motorcycle 1 retrofit 1 retrofit @ $5,435 @ $5,625 @ $5,000 @ $5,000 Sell 2 @ $400 3 @ $400 2 @ $450 2 @ $500 1 @ $500 $800 $1,200__ _ $900 ' $1 000 $500 Net $ $41,`740 $37,235 $38,925 $51,160 $28,900 Total cost of 16 new patrol vehicles, 2 retrofitted vehicles, and 2 motorcycles = $197,960. - PROPOSED ACQUISITION/REPLACEMENT SYSTEM FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 ffi # of patrol units 8 9 9 10 10 # of fleet units 7 7 7 7 7 Purchase 7 @ $10,635 3 @ $11,000 5 @ $3.1,400 3 retrofitted $74,445 = -$33,000 = $57,000 @ $5,000 -0- I motorcycle 1 motorcycle $15,000 s, @ $5,435 @ $5,625 Sell 1 @ $400 2 @ $400 1 @ $450 1 @ $500 = $400 = $800 = $450 = $500 -0- Interest Earned on $175,000 $8,043 $5,645 _ $4,337 Net $ $66,000 $31,990 $57,838 $14,500 -0- Total cost of 15 new patrol vehicles, 3 retrofitted vehicles, and 2 motorcycles = $1701328, with a remainder of $4,671 returned to General Fund. Based on allocation of $175,000 to interest bearing (8%) Vehicle Replacement Account in FY 54-85 with full expenditure (less remainder noted) by end of FY 86/87. s CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN DIVISION DETAIL DEPARTMENT : GENERALGOVERNMENT DIVISION: POLICE, LIBRARY;, ADMINISTRATION YEAR 1 - Civic Center $255,000 Civic Center Furnishings 100,000r Phase I - Vehicle Replacement 66,000 Phase I - Public Works Equipment Replacement 150,000' Phase I - Computer Hardware 42,237 Computer Hardware - Engineering 8,000 Phase I - Computer Equipment - Engineering 34,000' Phase I --'Word and Data Processing Terminals 1,000 Computer Circulation Control - Library 2,000` Police Communications/Dispatch System 68,460 Phase I - Office Equipment 3,500 4,500 File Cabinets Microfilm/Microfiche Equipment 15,000 Phase I - Library Books, Materials 30,000: YEAR 2 - Civic Center $255,000 Phase II - Vehicle Replacement 31,990 Phase II - Public Works Equipment Replacement 60,000 Phase II - Computer Hardware 42,237 Phase II - Computer Equipment - Engineering 15,500 Phase II - Word and Data Processing Terminals, Printer 18,000 Public Access Computer - Library 2,000 - Phase II - Office Equipment 3,100 Phase II -- Library Books, Materials 30,000 YEAR 3 - Civic Center $255,000 Phase III - Vehicle Replacement 57,838 Phase III Public Works Equipment Replacement 60,000 Phase III - Computer Hardware : 21,119 Phase III - Computer Equipment -- Engineering 10,000 Phase III - Word and Data Processing Terminals 9,000 Phase III - Office Equipment 3,500 Phase III - library Books, Materials 30,000 YEAR A .- Civic Center $255,000 Phase IV - Vehicle Replacement 1.4,500 Phase IV - Public Works Equipment Replacement 85,000 Phase IV - Computer Equipment - Engineering 4,500 Phase IV - Word and Data Processing Terminals 3,000 Phase IV - Office Equipment 1,400 Phase IV Library Books, Materials 30,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN 's DIVISIOQ DETAIL (cont.) YEAR 5 - $255,000 x Civic Center 100,000 } Phase V - Public Works Equipment Replacement 4,500 phase V - Computer Equipment'- Engineering 6,000 ;phase V - Word and Data Processing Terminals 3,500 % Phase V - Office Equipment 30;000 Phase V - Library `Books, Materials •H#-3(-T4-H H it-MSE-iE-?E-k-H-Haf-H-H�:1�-H#-H-H-3(H M-H-H-H-H�f RAE-H�-H-H-1E#�t#-DE-H 3E#-H D(�(�E-If-DE k-H-H H#H-H-H-DE-H-4E-H#-Hie it-H H H-DFi(-H?tHi4H H-3E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING SUMMARY FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89. TOTAL Civic Center $ 355,OQo $ 291 990 $ 117,808 $ 2S9,500 $ 100,000 $�625 008 Vehicles $ 215,0__ $ .- 7,500 $ 10,500 $ 223 093 87,237 $ 77`737 $_40,119 $_ Computers $�_ $ $ 31 400 $ 33,506 $ 252,960 Major Equip. $ 121 460 yi s3,lOG 33 500 r $ -- $ T 0 T A L S $ 779,697 $ 457,827 _ $__546,45 $ 393,400 . $ 394 000- $2,476,381 #-�- iFDEH#-H-TE#-�-Y4-H-H-S!HH-H-H-)tH-Hie*t-?4#-H-H-H#-3EH-H-HH-}Eit-HiEH.4EH 3(-H-?E#it-H-H-1E?EH-HHl4#H#-DE3t-1(-H-H-H##HdEH�Hf-H-3f-}(-H-H-H-?t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL__. Federal $__ 104 000 42,OOfl $ 45,000 `$__�. State Gas Tax d6,000 $_ 11,000_ $ $ $ City $- _ - $--- $---r_- $ 111,3000 General Fund $ 545,697 $ 397,827 $ 417,457 $ 351,-4�0_ $29p�000 $ ' 169,500 Sewer Fund $�96 000 $ 49,000_ $ 14,500 $__ $ 45.000 $ 91,500• 8DF $.32 000 $ - $_14 500 $__ - $— --- -T 0 T AS_ `� 779,697 $_457,827 $?46,457._ $ 393� 00 $ 399.000_ $2,476,381 Ki a i =F e p. k a t CAPITAL 3:MpRoVeJEN' PROGRAM PLAM r t. pRojECT ®ETAI DEPARTMENT: PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER DIVISION: PROJECT LOCATION: Tektronix building adjoining City Hall, at Ash Ave. & Burnham St. ` PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase of building is proposed to Canso aced government activities and agencies, relieve evewhilmpesavinglctaxp dollarsaces in lostto buildings, and 'better serve the public continually rising rental charges. The allocation of division space would be as follows: Library ft. (20%) -%� sq `ft.(45X); Police;— 10,924 sq. ft (35`Y); Administration— 7,250 sq. Funding for purchase of new Civic Center would be from General. Fund. x-xndinHr��cor purchase of ne-�x-xivicxxxxx�x'xxxxr�xxxx�cxxxx�HxxxxH#xx�xHxx'xx#x��xxxr� ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $2,200,000 Purchase of building for new Civic Center ($255,000 allocated per yr.) , t- j TOTAL $2,200,000 ;EH#x-Ha(-)ii(-x x:X-x-DHEiHF-lE'x-?(�i-K-x i(x-IEM-M-H-x H H-M-x x-x x-3f-H-4E H3(-�x-x-H#x x.x.H'H x-x-YFx-x-DQ-)E H#}E-M-k-H-?H(-H X-x-H x�HI-H-H#x-?EH ' x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL r FY` 84-85_ FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 Federal State City $ -- General Fund $ 255.000 $ 25 $$ 2'55 005 $$ 255,000- 25 0 $1$ ,275,000 T O T A L S_ $ 255 000_ $ 255,000 _ $ 255,000.. 000?55,000 $— $ 255 $1,275,00 0 �4 PISH H 3EiF31#x M#x i{H x X 3(did H x#X 3f'�S#x iHf H H x L 3 TT /+ wi UY o, SYI.LG i LOCATION: , C a LEWIS OALL 5T. _ aa�� LNSw tN1GEt{j� 4" !I• 'L.17 �j( = 5.W 3 CTT 4 E a If �� `. T it.7MEADOV(T / !� L R f f K. ,\ KMMEAiN 5'f� h J•*�s 4F.♦' J•� - - �� U 3 �., RYDESDPIF 1 C C LT.- ANN ST. Nur O!li sw1 q _ •sf �r4��''p�/) S// war qyM 5111. 9 .NA (�'"`� J •ter TT. .w y tvfltl f+.. ' 41 .l/144 S.N.1t1 NNEN''� ri a ► 99 /� W 51F. f ///{{{ SYI. • �% (J 5T 5.H PDNNEA fy / S W •Tx`o V/t4 9q ♦ `p DEN. ' ST CDON 1(+'1.o � J�y E t-Q♦Ffl ST.'fry \ > ; N �ry S.q,. =D' • /q SW. ~ MI I ST. f .c;.. ! Sad (1 DQ' •',_� �~., S'A__rr DSIFAF - SW. I a �')"v J A p�! CNEANY E.I a..•I • ♦ �6! (:. S.V.. �..�.. 1 .e } f i ' u I �IIIlIG91ii QIP ♦ t1 ��IgI �I �Ngq q��( ® IglNgllq�glq� 1ggq�IIII�I��gI�IIH � �IN��I a t Hill ry �Ililll I . �" Ipll � x RNam 1 1 �s��• III — r+. ��.,�vl �t�� N I ��3S X29}� ` •[y'h�••,, 7 �z r t yd I In [ ( : girl ,� ,•.:rx` a ro:_.�_. a"�;+";��-.�-'s_ "'",'?..- ��.`-:c�+�.+w"`,� 'Y -"a- `s'y'� zv�.�; ��,'.�&'"€?"'v`'",5-$ ,>i�•"�c�„41 -_.;, � "� %`ttx�`-, '`�`..'n.,.:r•- � -, .-w*_,r -��_sr.-....: - „*, �� ,k.,'l_,: ..c rage= k. fr x,;.41 ,. �vrs��.�:--x =.:z:� »..�t.>ma.,.:,w.�.-��d2:.t�.;� ;tri..«- :c��. -'�. ".�;..s, �'.w..-` � _fie.e,.•-?�4 .....q;..hxs..+. •� •zc,.a.,.::..,vT ;s.rt�S... -. -. ,�'_ , '+?` .,' '� �:`.-�, �."-� �.s:;1.-., ; .sem''T.S; _�;,� '.�€�=�..3^,,. ,�;i::•,f_,�,._�},,z� ��a�.-r..�r e �",,.-..,.:� ,, ,;�^ �.:a 3 .�..�:t'z-... .,,�t .:t. ,..x .� ��, ,-,�.vi�" _�.k�rhl�y�.G ,:,•�'�` „�#x�i �+, .t.. Prr.-�.��.aac.,�..,� ,,.z:r,w.�•—•.;tom.... z� .,sw � _ .x�r x.a.a-.a�?s.._ ;s��.� �;.�?V 'F- � st.._• _,k"�i ...� ..�`i""'�.'K�":a£'"_wu++d,-•, a ;�F.+�-a,;•..3 r, �,��:�'s�+��. n.€w... F,. .� o.,�.�t a.�; r,a.. .h. afi>>...a_ s��,�.x.�•-S" �r ...ds:.� ...`�..E. �.ij. � �,^� _,- t.r.,. ,..,.} z,..:s. � 5.3, �.n S,r.,.-.��. �,..�.�.. c€,n�'1%��-u��1�- �-�.�x�.} �'na:+� �s��' '�a�� :r��--��,��..��.,�'t,,a, ��.. �`_` ��r,��.< .:_,,��,�� x'�v� ? �� Me, t�#�ws.�., �} �•y,��'}��"�. <>��;Fy . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER FURNISHINGS DEPARTMENT: DIVISION: PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Relocat-ion of City_departments to new quarters will necessitate the purchase' of 'additional furnishings. The City Library is ; the department in greatest need for new furnishings and will receive about 70% of funds allocated to this project, including bookshelves, reading chairs, public tables and chairs. Probable funding for this project would be the General Fund. X-X-x-x#x#-x-xiE-x-xx-X-x x X-WY x x x-X-x x-x-x"-x"***-k x fi 7Ebi YEi(x#x x)F ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Library 70% $ 70,000 Police Dept. 20% 20,000 Administration 10% 10,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 if#x#x�(#x x X x x x x x x x X x(x x3i#x x x x###x-x-x-x-X)(x-x-x x-x-x-x*)(X x-x-x-t-x#x x x-x-x WX x-Df-x-x'x-x-x x WX K-x x-3*"x-x' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $' State $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 T 0 T A L S $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 LOCATION: � a, LEWISpp-LL T. Tw[ U a al� r Sw TA�,E N n�RYTNE "4 j ST. �\ ►L. CT. '�- >• '��i tt E90A s. T s• ac � d , Y A N:rT �at.» - A, /� d<rc,�; ° 4r (-s W�.1-� �n° V�0]p W,M• sw.ANN sT. st a L a ' ! 5 LLL._ •6A.lpL —37: / 'L4�'[ > PPo�T W »/� ® Sk 1, rT,r Il y4'F f•T pstt ST °' S of~�) pv9 ilJ1 yt. ,SOA 44 dl �4� \ WG�T S.K. fpNNEA 62 S r M NT ST. ` PGf^-.. n PA. F 6 r�,r «A'4. /\ �/ SW. VMNS ST. all 9Qj ` 1 R Y� ..--�� ...444�l \< • 4 A B Q t•z o Sp. fAN ST. 11 � dy +. •T � .K � ( .-N I ST ; S ' � � ^^�,�f f � i. CNEpAY Fi..._ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN ' PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: POLICE _ PROJECT: VEHICLE REPLACEMENT DIVISION: PATROL (112) PROJECT LOCATION: POLICE DEPT./CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace police--fleet vehicles. Funding for this project would be from the General Fund. •x-x-x-x-3t-x�t-M-X-x#H x-x-kiE#1{-X-x-?fX-xx-x x-x�t x-x•x-x-lEx-x'}iX-}FM-1(#k�(-x3(-x-X-x-x-x-x-4EX-x-x-X-X-x-�x-X-x-DL-xi(-Df 3E#�(x#-x�-k-x-x-x-x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 66,000 - FY 84-85 .less resale & int. earned $ Phase (new), I 3 `85 7 automobiles (new),automobiles (n31,990 Phase II- - FY 85-86 1 motorcycle, less resale & int. earned Phase III - FY 86-87 5 automobiles (new), "1 motorcycle, 57,838 less resale & int. earned 000 less resale 14,500 Phase IV - FY 87-88 3 automobiles (retrofitted @ $5. ) $170,328 TOTAL X_"*Y,**x3t X i(�t Dt x DE x'3E M X�f�HE x YE�E x X X�t #-x�it-k x-x-X-1d M�E-x��d-x'h3HFxX-X-x-x-x-k-x34-DE-x#k-tE�Y-x-x�d-x-xaHt-x-x-xi4 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL__ FY E4-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 Federal State City -- $ 1 O General Fund $___626:. 00 0 $ 3 $ 57,838 $$ 1— A 500= $---_ $ 170,328 T 0 T A L S $ 66,000_ $ 31,990 $ 57,838 _ $ 14,500 $__-__-__— $ y(-ydxX�x3(-14-x3E-td-x-x-x#3f-x-34-x#x#•x-x3Hd-xx-DE-xiHd-x-X#;d-x3(k / LOCATION: �EwIS _ o II ouvaLt ST. =+ �[c1\_v\``K ct6 ^�� q s.w. -� A L E "'N '�j � ✓VV � wv'Li' ul v,AAJJ — I MEAOOwT s .�amEs ac S�c`� o c� sw. s P+oso w 54 4 \\\ s YkE Sv. .w TO 0� �. '`F` e 99es eQ w '•✓r`_-,i`.'I p ya. zi' 1 Sl 4`"firer f � 4 qw. n¢RJ a^01 � � w y+s /�✓Sry,�`/ cp J 4t s{. �crRNEM ST =ytiTaiMS T , +�. /. {� C� le-:Rr>.••na� _ ST Y�oM{ F.N WAV~ O,R T � ed / Sw VARMS ST. S.w tOnNERLl — "_a- 4W t ST. ST aP'-ell ." o CAPITAL IMpROVEMEUT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS (215) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-SUPPORT SERVICES PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Purchase/replace public works equipment. ,d-M-x-MiE�l1Et(-yrH-x-x-x#x-x#-x-XiE#x-x-DFx#x-#-#iE?t-1E-x-xit-xiQ#-x-x#ii34M-i-Pf'�l-x-x-x-x-)Ex-x-FE?.-x-xxx-x-x-x-x#-x;:-xiE-xx�Q-x-x-x•x-x-xiE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I FY 84-85 1 Sewer Flusher Truck @ $80,000 $ SO,000 1 Dump Truck @ $32,000 32,000 2 3/4 T pick-up trucks @ $10,000, 20,000 3 Small pick-up trucks @ $6,000 18,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 1 TV Sewer Trailer @ $30,000 30,000 1 asphalt roller @ $11,000 11,000 1 van @'$12,000 12,000 assorted smaller equipment 7,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 1 backhoe @ $29,000 29,000 1 1T truck @ $14,500 14,500 1 Tractor @ $9,500 9,500 assorted smaller equipment 7,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 1 dump truck 32,000 1 tractor w. articulated arm @ $28,000 28,000 I van 12,000 1 small pick-up truck 6,000 assorted smaller equipment 7,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 1 street sweeper truck @ $90,000 90,000 1 3/4 T pick--up truck 10,000 TOTAL $455,000 -xiEx-xii-x•�(iElE-##-x�E•'x�Si(-DEifidid•#�t-x-xaE�FM-��Ex-x•#-x-x'x-x�ix#-xifi4�yd'#it-ic>rici.-..,��.P z-xi(��f-x M-DE#�F SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ _ $ $ $ $ State Gas Tax $ 6,000 $ 11,000 $ $ 42,000 $$ 45,000 $$ 104,000 $ General Fund $ 16,000_ $ $ 31,000 $ 43,000 $ $__90,000 Sewer Fund $ 96,000 $ 49,000 $ 14,500 $ $ 10,000 $ ].69,500 GDF r $ 32,000 $ $ 14,500 $ $ 45,000_ $ 91,50 T O T A L S $ 150,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 85,000 $ 100,000 $ 455,000 �'f-x-x�Jl-➢F'x-H34�EiF�E•#•:fii-x-x-�rx-"K-K�ii#3E�(-x-x##-x-x-x-id-x##1(-x-x-x-)E#•34-YF�(x-x-x-?:-x-x-x#�E-E(-x-##-x34-x H-x-x•#-`x-H-x-1(•it-xYc##if'x-x•## /� LOCATION cT� NllrST.r. O TW. ♦ ` �C. NCRf10y SMS•. ; < '`��r ,�i�'`/�) S �,\\`S _`� w�AY� y Q O1 N V 9 GSM. ®�a J ST. C. 9T. - . T' [y / "i�F `^.� "'7,��`-fi coox �/� �P +J��' � �� c�•e, 9i. � � a:Y aae; ro - �P { „��st s �{: „+✓�• � 9e"i�. 1177! sa, ouna _ ( � sx. 1 - _ .s CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PR07ECT DETAIL' PROJECT: COMPUTER HARDWARE DEPARTMENT FINANCE & SERVICES DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: current WANG 0IS Model with a VS model is proposed Replacement of the City' s to maintain and enhance staff productivity and the timely continuity of City lizing a VS processing system, would provide for business. The new model, uti abilities, faster processing speeds, better formatting greater data storage cap options, and the addition of more work stations/terminals as needed. Funding for this project would be the General ;Fund. tt xx' tkx' xxxx xitx tx�cx xa xx'�-xx-x x' xx xxx xxxxxxxxx ' xxxxicxxx' x�txx'xxxxxx�cx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Lease/purchase @$3519.76 per month $ 42,237 Phase I -'FY 84=85 42,237 phaseII — 'FY 85-86 21,119 Phase III— FY 86-87 (7/66-12/86) k t ' TOTAL $105,593 ?(iE�f-x 3E�x'�t-x�f-xx-DE H-x-DFM-x-M-x3E-x-TE-x�4-Mi(-xi4-x H-x3i x-x-�Hi-x��xil-x-x)E�iH('#-x-x3E#M-x X H-3E-x-x-3E'#'�H(x-xiE#;(�(-x-x�E'x-H-x-x x-AE # SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 : TOTAL $ $ $ $ $ Federal $ $ State $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ 105,593 General Fund $ 42,237 $ 42,237 $ 21,119.. TOT A L S $_ 42,237 $ 42,237 $_ 21,119 $ $ $ 105,593 z rs #x-x-x�if-DE-x#x-x-x-DFD�l�#DQa4i(-x�Fx-x-x-x-xit-DE-x-x##x#x-x'DF'xx-x-DE'x-DtiFx-x'DFDFX�Fx-DFDFE4-x'K-Ycx#-x-DFx#x�,d-x-x-DHFx\iFD(-x-xiE3t' ` A 5.w LOCATION 3.EL C..~M .,t.£ II • , NGR CT; tl, Eq Sb fl �r F. . It J _• rcl �. ST.~ Y� 4. ♦� Y L j SSO,.w ERROL 51. a {C,w CPg ? K +,T O � ^� f IR� � ti ;4 ,. p0 ,N. ST l CAPMEN ST. 3)R. M :�it MIS S'J< :�S �/ J�, / •� E , . •T. � -M(~ - Sw '� //.2 x O a q q�' ' .NyL'•t / Sb. YLRNS ST I CS �,. �� Sb. FARA St �J ;+� ' / e'a+•' IIR 3T 3T. i s Sw. RE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER HARDWARE-ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: ENGINEERING ;(216) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of the City's current WANG MVP Model, with a suitable used CPU, is proposed " to maintain and enhance the range of work projects capable of accomplishment in—house by: the Engineering Division. The proposed CPU would' utilize an LVP processing system, to be compatible with the nature of civil engineering projects and proposed software programs and peripheral equipment. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. #i4-x-x�t-x-x-x�Y•3f=t(-DiiE�#x-x-x-x x-3E�Q-DFx x-x-x-x-x-x-x-i(-iFx-x-xi(-xi(•x-YEx-x-x-x-x x-x-x-x-xi1}i-x-x-x-?(-:(#x-x-M-x-x-x-x-x3Ex##-x'�(-x-xx-x-x TE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: - Purchase of used LVP-CPU $ 5,000 Purchase of disc drive 3,000 TOTAL $ 8,000 3t-x K-k-il-x-x-x-x-xit-x-xit-x-x�E'k-x-#at 3t-x�c-x-x-x-x-?Ex-�a(-x-x-x#x-x-x-x H-x-x-x-DF3l�(-x��4-x-x�d�t-DE-x�c-x�(-x-x-x�f-x-x-x-x x-x-x-D(H•�t#x-x x)f SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 - FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89- TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City _ $ $ $ $ $— $ General Fund $ 8,000 $ $ $ $_ $ 81000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 8,000 $ $ _ $ $ $ 8,000 •x�-x-x-x-x-xat-x-x-x-��-x-►i-x-sort-x-x-x-xx-x-x�c-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-�-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-�¢x-x-x-x-x-x-ac-x-x-x-x-x-x�t-xx-xx-x-x-x-r�x��-x•x-x-�x-x=x-x- LOCATION: �- � fqlLEr15 a sv.L 'ry y WVALL ST. s m im ( 111 7-1 S.w 4 4.ES CT a o I mrtt a10gR0 Pq•E' 4 �'M1 i b f -i k. [.¢ T S AC g (�. H C L �cT. � yI' + SN..ANN 9T. # 'RAT-WIC o- (hy � [W� .� •fC NTFY050 WAy m49 Eg... t lJ � $ CARMEN $T r� eef S AT ♦4. ♦ 99 �, `-�RiMf Jf `41 $.W IONNCR T2 'W -CRARY g. ! $T' OZRR Z 0 �4 P 1 [w VARRL 9T S.W. �. ms's o, n W. FAaR sT. / � , �-✓ \�hh0 y � ♦t �• J r0! V }E ¢T � `Y fll i LR. i a^ �/g�`g� 06,41/. w.C'J' Oe1ARA cT. J �. a ; n♦ s i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN tF PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT COMPUTER_EQUIP'.-ENGINEERING DEP^�RTMENT: PUBLIC WORK: DIVISION: ENGINEERING (216) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An incremental, component purchasing program is; proposed to update and enhance the existing computer systemto handle a wider range of engineering/design-oriented work assignments. Greater efficiency in ;dealing -with often time-consuming, civil engineering projects is an expected result from Usage of the new equipment. More in-house engineering projects with fewer 'staff increases would result in greater productivity gains. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I FY 84-85 WANG Graphics Scope $3,600 related software 2,500' $ 6,100 Hewlett-Packard Plotter (36"x48") $24,400 related software 3,500 _27,900 Phase II - FY 85-86 CALCOMP'Ditigitizing Board $6,000 related software 2,`500 8,500 additional software (EMDS)(MDS) 7,000 Phase 'III - FY 86-87 additional software 4,500 Phase IV -`FY 87-88 additional software and work stations' 10,000 Phase V -' FY 88-89 additional software' 4,500 £G 'TOTAL $68,500 #-X-DE�t-X-DF?E3E-3Q-x-DE##-Xi(-'h x-X X-X-DE#-X-x-X-7E X DHf-x-3E-1F t!-x-)i-X-if x###-X##-X-X-X-I(-x?(-DFX#-x-x#-x##-YFx-X-X-1E-X#-fE x#X##-x-X-:4#-x•DE# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 55-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ — $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 34,000 $ 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 68,500 T 0 T A L S $ 34,000 $ 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 68,500 �t-x-x-x-x-x�-X-x-x-x-X-x-X-�-X-fix x-x-x-x-X-xaE##�-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x#-x-x#-x X#-X-X-x->E#-x-x-xx-x-X-x-X•X�at-X-x#-X-X-x-X-X-xX-X-x-x�c-X-x-x#-x#-x LOCATION: C-11 �.(/ Y-7 Q��r{{1 Zu T L � S ` tt CSM W k 1. RC CT �w Le.AISI SP. APL-w - E ) � !P1 4,y J HEINO.Sp N N SW ERADL ♦4 Y�dt 4` At OP ��,WR'- \ IG,ey / Q �ll Y� ,v LID. Fa+rl AJ'P n ♦ � >6 -sT. H G�re a •s C,,SUEA W y!1 � J Ti e FT• .0.CIH, f Y PW .%/s'y^�`�C Af / `lC KS R ST t• DML ESA c Q i Y[\- 11$ - �'C`��•'� it i '�' P�, c _ / 41tY,1�^PI^ � L? . t `SAI //� _ d �pp� LN � w �4•D Ptp. H � r C,Jl St. /\ � a 1 A R I N I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT pRWOAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WORD & DASECUR�TYJSOFT4JARES. NAL DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122)ARTMENT: FINANCE & VICES, PRINTER, SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: data 4 additional word processing terminals and two (2) purchase of four ( ) processing terminals, is proposed to respond e greater volumes of work s being produced and more frequent' usage` of existing terminals by more departments and staff. ion of more workstations will necessitate purchase of The addita printer in order to ,accommodate increased output Funding for this project would be the General Fund. x�•at-�t�c-�-x3t-x-�c-x-xac-x-�.x-x-�c-�r-tt-xx-3e•�x-x-�-k-a�tc-x-x-x-��cx-x-x�t-��-x-xxx-x'x-xx-rix-x-x-xaE�ac�c-�'x-�t�c-x-xx-x-xM-r.-��-�x-x#a�-x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: terminl $ 1,000 Phase I — FY `84-85 Z cashierocessinga �terminalso@ $6,000 ea. 12,000 (1 support services, 1 police) 5,000 1 printer 1,000 1 security software program (police) Phase III — FY 86-87 1 word processing terminal 6,000 (Library/Supp.Serv.) 1 data processing terminal' 3,000 (Accounting/other) 3,000 Phase IV — FY 87-88 1 data processing terminal 6,000 processing terminal ; Phase V — FY 88-89 1 word p $ `37,000TOTAL ` t-H�t.�`-qQ-Mit-YF•it-iE�E-xif-:t-XiF•x-�d#-M'�(9H?it'#-lki(-1c-x-3Eit'h-1�X�t-MiEif-3B-x-M#�,FM-x-:�(-�f-x-xi(-S6-M-x-�X-K➢hifx-K-#-x-1{-DF?t-Df-H SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY8_6"-8� FY 87-88 FY 8_ 8_____89 TOTAL— Federal $_ $�_ $--__— $ $____ $-- ------ State $ $ $� $ $ City General Fund 7,000 $ 1,000 $ 18,000 $$ 9,000'.- 3 000 $� 3 TOT A L S $ 1 000 $--18000 $ 9,000 $ 3,000 $ 6000 $_. 37,0 �tYi�Y)f3Fi£HH3fiF#}Hf3ii(3FMiC3t3EDEtt p a , �° �✓ ,i w u zT LOCATION: A L L �✓ w T. pi.. A6Q j ItXiHlu!eY" f—f �`V t�� f 1 f.vf�� _ / 1y 2 r s ■�u°i`� NT� t,q<Ra fR ,` �S't• \�- _' IIW 4 11T C fT.N A � CC•R V PlT 8` /p\ \Ty� tm. � JC aNCALOJO Ink ^ .f, w• Em.fMi ft. � � \edl— 6r \ T \ l ° Sb•..VGC ty r 7-0I LflnKLk `-b4TeMf�v 'Pr �, ry r rf �4� ` a ` / a .� r. a. Fi i..�n of �a'� � as"w'TJ. fm. aL•un 1 CAPITAL IMMVEMENT PRoGRA14 PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY PROJECT: CIRCULATION CONTR01._ DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (141) `COMPUTER--LIBRARY PROJECT LOCATION: LIBRARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: system is proposed for staff usage in Purchase of a small micro-computer ted circulation control system for management of books establishing an automa and materials in circulation. The computer would also be useful for in—house bookkeeping, records control, invoices and card duplication. t would be the General Fund. Funding for this projec ' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: { -screen, disc drive, printer $ 2,000 small micro—computer, I TOTAL $ 2,000 #M#3f-M-M-M-M-M-M-M-)EM-PHfIE-M#�'Yc'M-M-M-D�M•M-1E#M-M-M-M-34-Jt a(-M-M#M-M�d•##MDf-M-M-M-M•%#3S#>E#DH(iEM-3t-M-M 1E-1(-M-iE3(-M-M-M-M-M-M-Mi(-M-M-M-M SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 EY 85_86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88MOM FY 88-89 TOTAL _ Federal State $ $ $ $ $ City $_____ $_ _ $' $ $ $ 2,000 General Fund $ 2,000 T 0 T AL S $ 2000 $ � $ #$Fi4i£jE M d M M F#M M M#fE'k M 14ii3£it l{M M*K-X H M M M-M-3E 3t#x P(3f MiH M�()i M M M#M`M#M HiE M�E#i(#M M M�?M M#M M iE�E Mat M#M MSE LOCATION:3i i L±1 FL. ST. „ 4 / 8 F SW LY 5. 3 LL Eµf¢. �\�•�-r:R t. FC ,\ �-�f� i 4� SW fCFN09p �J Si M SJ i may, Su.Ann sT: s�� tw ,� _ N ' �u iJ 6 � 9 W � C�1•V'Fa fW. OW�SW TO L 4 Afr. 4 iJ 4°t'aZf �yFf f b F ST LARNEM. =WATeWS p� i %/\ 5,�, C/c , ST. yi' �4 5 AaNt Tt. A ST. L `y ►� yr:'. %C�,� 4 t=M:J �/y�P ?ids .Q�i'.iJ x f�.. \\\\ 1 Z S �.' `'+,'•,T l i i J`` /` � of«i�ti�a. ° oScaeA _ I( � ,v. i CAPITAL IMPROVEPii PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: POLICE COMMUNICATIONSIDISPATCH DEPARTMENT: POLICE C1IV' SIGN: SERVICES (114) PROJECT LOCATION: POLICE DEPT. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace current antiquatedradio dispatch system with modern reliable microwave dispatch equipment. The new system would provide direct monitoring and communication with adjoining agencies and eliminate "dead spots" in communication with officer utilizing porta pak units in field. Enhanced responsiveness to citizen requests for:assistance and greater' safety for officers would be expected benefits of new system. A related- back-up tape—recording system is needed to insure accuracy of call; proof and confirmation of communications; training of personnel;' and as an investigative tool. Funding for this project would be the General Fund`. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: microwave radio-dispatch system $ 51,995 back-up tape recording system 16,465 TOTAL $ 68,460 #i(3F-�#3Ht-x-x•�-M-x-:E-x-x-}Ht-xK-H-�-3t�it#3E:t-#3d-Hi{-?E-x-x-x#-H-�x-x-x3t-x�Hc-)E-H"DE-x�(-x-ttiE�f-X-3E�t r`�.#'k-#-�-3t"#H-x-H�t x-x 3t-x-�4"jai-x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY '88-89 TOTAL--- Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ Cites $ $ $� $ $ — $ General Fund $ 68,460 $_ $ $ $ $Y 68,460 $ $ $ $ s T 0 T A L S $ 68,460 $ — $ $ $ $_ 68.460 •3H4#3(#Dt#lii4}ETH-M#�F3E-H-Mil-3f-�-#j(-D(#34-?HEikiE-M-DHS-x",1E2£-%r•x-)t-BE#iE'A�f'}4i4#1t-x-3i-t�-X#X-M X-M-x"3(-k•�#X-3(#?(-AS-A(-x-X-H-1tiS-�x#H-X-?f" 1! Nit °�YAL s J uNcvc LOCATION: sT. cST,' -+ LTJ M1`iN 5, q° Cr N\\ S 4A,apY� �9O r - � Y`- +' r- {PM SO ri.ANN ST/. 3 PAP A1�N.i=__- SW1 M ♦,fry, C/ s. r I.$ SC HCAM030 AY � J TO ST. SW. f iARMSA �`W. P y W 561 .tl Al 6y%CiCt { P aLp �ar 6\ \3 •''4 �Pti 1 SW. .^vARNT^ ST � 9 a ._. ci °• s 'PArtA sr / — ; / __ .' �:<,y Pr ! YI = f N 61A St. [ /. CSZRAV ININ WINE FEW WORMA Y.A +0 y y / Sri {••J9p,fl* f Y t� ST� 3 i'i ' g9df OT• �'�5' S.W. __ Otl_�.7AAA - / S W t .:. z n CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PPflJ€CT DETAIL PROJECT: OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION: ALL PROJECT LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION:` Purchase/replace office equipment as needed to maintain and increase staff productivity. Funding for this project would be the 'General Fund. xx�t#x x # #xxx a xatx##xrx x�cxxx�cxxxx # xx xX-X-X-x-x-"-K-X-xx# #acx#xxxx #xxx xx�t ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST:` 5,000 c typewriter replacements @ $1,000 ea./l per FY $ 6,000 photo copiers @ $2,000/FY 84-85 Library FY 85-86 Administration FY 86-87 Police adding machines/calculators @ $250/2 in FY -84-85 ` 1,500 2 in FY ,86-87 2 in FY 88-89 dictation system - 6' dictaphones @ $200, 2,500 2-transcribers @ $650 ea FY 85-86 4 dictaphones, 2 transcribers, FY 87-88 2 dictaphones TOTAL $...15,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86=87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal - $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $— $-- city —Citi $ $ $— - $ $ - $ General Fund $ 3,500 $ 3,100 $$ 3,500 $$ 1,400 $ 3,500 $$_ 15,000 T 0 T A t_ S $ 3,500 $ 3,100 $—. 3,500 $--I-,.-400 $_ 3,500 $ 15,00 #tt-1�3E#�#-Y�#-M-#ifii-3S-)4-M-M#-D(-##H•�S�it�E•H#-2(-H-M-D(ii-1d3Hi)(?t-?t-)E##�£-3S-3E#iEDE-M-D:-Df-;E-?t-H'h#X-Mintafit-H-3f-9EX#i4-H-Sf-)E�-�?-3E#-/—#>-H•M 1t# f+ (�t�I11( _-3�t a... # Sw LQ i '\/ ��-•.--- rte -_ L \., TI`Q r..i.. O n_ I (/ C�• 9�� S( J UTALL ST 1,�ARQ � ♦f �— C f =4, LT CSOAl2'•�� b kar � ST.N SW A1YA ET. O t' zy� R \ TCAr V . .t• •�i C w.t V /'' �� 's^ 4 l �" tr '/ \ d '�l`C 4 yj 'V 8 I/ o~'q � "`�•�.1 Sr fna0iT �♦ [.wl Dot � � /� ^! � 1V � A (/ �+F y 41 4` 4 p s, ° Tf s♦. Y \ BG+ /R 4 d Y� ro Se. ST. 59. F N�lr t• Gf W. 'y ♦ f4 + / �Q 4 % ST. CAAaiM iRT¢WS J b NOS :J, y�V`/CA Sf % T iT. ♦ S l' •�� .. s. - ¢Y ,� ,�P�. � � °9 i '�+ / / •f.-u.e,....c, Kf RO ]i (G' Ok IA�CT OEkkY q1L . S qd , Sw. V S ST Tq f: / t � cask / �a � �•A� e map ST.'�' b w^" s� .. s �. �< zt•••La �' /� yea L..r, / 11 h OQ• 4/. s 4w. OLA7k i \ Lw�l k•♦ A f�yJ Sw � f. lllR.fj(EkI I 1rST-. C i n Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT.DETAIL PROJECT: FILE CABINETS DEPARTMENT: FINANCE & SERVICES DIVISION: 'RECORDS' MANAGEMENT PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION': Additional fire—proof file cabinets are needed to secure important City documentation', enhance records management and "control, and alleviate 'severely constrained storage conditions. Project ;will increase current storage vault capacity of 1064 lin. inches to 3000 lin. inches'. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. ##iEH-H-�H-H-HIFH-H-i(-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-)E H-H-H-Hii-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H?E M I(.H#H-H H-H-H#lt H�(H-Df-H-H H DE#iE H-H?E H-H-H-SE�(-➢4-3EH-N-H#H�(-H-H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 3000" storage file cabinets $ - 4,500 TOTAL $ 4,500 •H-H#3{-D4-H H-H#H-Hit-tE M#H-it-H-H-P(#H-Hif-H-H-H-:F�i-hi-H if-Df-:(#H#TE H#H-H3E-H it#H#H-H###Hi(H•ii-j(#H-H-H#H-H-)E-H�E H-H-H-3f-H-f(H H#f:3E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $_ $ > $ State $_ $ $ $ $ $ Cite $ $ $ $ $__ $ _ General Fund $ 4,500 $ $ $ $ $ 4,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 4,500 $ $ $_ $ $ 4,500 H H#HiHfi#H H 3E#H)f H k K A-H-N-H-H X-X-K*-X-K H-H-H-H#H 3(#H#M-H X-#-#-X iE H#3(HaE#H Hi(##H�t i(�3d H M j(H###DE3�HiH(#H C H X-* LOCATION naaao .• e vt �� Ts�''KYT1K r� _ I Y[AaawT a+ S/} If a 4..d� s N!C� •lKR1 S � �AA an Y i. + �u CI 4aAJI��`' �- RAGC v��t\. GT. 1, T TT:.P ayp i Ayd Tq.A0.T1 ii. APIA �� 4 P<!t !f O 4w. .J//' GPRMSIC ST SA+. ayrya Y,. �aM i B YY V 1 C 4� t� It HS OP TP.. � :E �r Ct aaY�4.�F !! 44 w ® J tli � 4� � aK.�l� )►r!)t� p. t+ 558•" i+ z � tl � �A. �j se. tyeRxs it �ta� !k Aar. FAA T .i $ 7• ..� `. 4 tom$'/. ' //g � `� \ PIS ST 9i. r P O A• .' /1,.,c le... Y' C Aa�YF7r1 I S4: + �g y"' Tt 0�. a;.� S.a C 04eM♦ I � r. iq Ai CAPITAL IMPROVErE"T PROGRAM PLAN t 1,Ra7ECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROJECT: MICROFILM/MICROFICHE EQUIP• DIVISION LIBRARY, POLICE PROJECT LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER is proposed to maintain security and PROJECT DESCRIPTION! egt,ipment gement I `City business, enhance records management Purchase of microfilm/fiche requirements. historical documentation ensive storage - 'i control, and minimize future exp project would be the General Fund. Funding for this prol #�c�t-X-x##x-x#x#xx#x#.xx-x#K#xxx�t k $ ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: : 3,000 i Management) @ ,$3,000 4,000 12,000 1 camera unit_( Records Manag reader printers @ $ 3_combination `microfilm-micraficPoliCe) (Administration, Library,, I I { $ 15,000 TOTAL AK Ey x-x-x x#at-x-##ata,-x-x-tt-Khat-xatat-x-Kat x-K#-x-xat-x-xat-x x#-xat x#at x-K-x-x-x-x-x-x xxatKxaHchaEhKhhxat�t#xatxx# FY 87-88 FY TOTAL SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLA FY 85-85_ FY_--86-87- ----- FY 84_85 Federal $_------- _-------- $_ - - $-_- $000 State $--------- $� $_ _ _— - $-------- $_ Ge_neralFund $$ 15_ OOQ= $-- $ -_- $$_-- - $�--- - $-— - $ $- $--------- - - $ 1500 T O T A L S 3tKtxitx#3(#x#Kxx3FxxDtK'x �t sw 3€1{-y�{x}txPIZE#xatxx'#KKxK'k## ,.� btu 3 T"ITI�RT-Kal'!'TRT�"Ji'�� '...•� C SC LOCATION: sy.«�eYt.Knso- „I� tm♦C—x:+4SE! cTt_~�r fR t� � �• \ 1 I C,.-?-f f j ` )'�G�,CKeR'.N��.�.�.i•SR i9.N0 �\ T� d c� )s J,fAkOIO W¢ u�' Atltl.sT. Ia •"tl � f a\ V � 'r -i \ ae. s <t�/Rr .. � I/ M �(�� t nl m t• .t ST 9 ST 9a"' C 9ct"{. *t• e ♦ -. .ua�.� '� Ff9- st. SEE a0 �a �let s.a. �i � � r,A P�tjS•�fs�R sT. � xw- is .: . Vr/ .^- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN r PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: BOOKS, MATERIALS DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (141) PROJECT LOCATION: LIBRARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A five percent (5%) net expansion of new books and materials is sought for the City Library. This addition of Library materials will include the purchase of new books, magazines, newspapers, cassettes, and records as well as the replacement of old and worn materials. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $150,000 $30,000 per year @ 5 years TOTAL $150,000 ##-3i-Ti-x"�t-X#X�#-X:i-N,-x-XiFi(M-x-x�E X•x�f-X#-Hi(i4it-k-X-x-x�F-x-x-H-X�Fx-D4-1(-X-x M-X-x x-X-X-H#-x-X�(-3(7E#-H-�##-H Dt x�E-H-x-x-x�Q-x-H x-x-)E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY '84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL $ $ $ $ $ $ Federal $ $ $ State City $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 30,000 $:::31 0,000 $$ 30,000 $$ 30,000 $$ 30,000 $$ 150,000 T O T A L S $— 30,000_ $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $_30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,0OUIALL00 xxx :Xfx,�xx#xx �xxxxExx i LOCATION: ii l3 z.� � . EL K!-A'TH£ « q'ii C - / O �� 4 W � SCA=IDJD WAY yo a vim—, ,p r y S.W. 41. S15. FD%NEa' .♦•F �G5W-. Tw a vv � 1 'li�4 i n :T \ CARY.EN �gM1T%MIS �,4 .%1s�n (�C SJ I AL ST. 1 �lJ�'yc7E s I ` >o ¢r NT / I a a u .P 4 �` c =11 LN itl �g oP-qi� iW,C D'NAPA l SWC N . 17 r-71 NIIIII t 1 ; 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER DEPARTMENT: DIVISION: PROJECT LOCATION: Tektronix building adjoining City Nall, at Ash Ave. & i Burnham St: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase of building is proposed to consolidate government activities and agencies, relieve cramped office spaces in separated p buildings, and 'better serve the public while saving tax dollars lost: to continually rising rental charges: The allocation of division' space would be as follows: Library - 15,000 sq. ft. (45%); Police - 10,924 sq ft (35%); Administration- 7,250 sq ft.;(20%). Funding for purchase of new 'Civic Center would be from General Fund. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: t Purchase of building for new Civic Center $2,200,000 ($255,000 allocated per yr.) t i V TOTAL $2,200,000 Y�Ei4xxitxxxxi(xxDE#xxlEiF#xiE#xiExxiExxx3F?4Hx#x!(xxlH4xxYxltxxxlEitxxxxxxx-x-x-xxxxxxxxxxPHtxx#xiF# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN (` FY 84-85_. FY 85-86 FY 86-87FY 87-88 FY 88-89 - TOTAL. Federal $ $ $ $ $ $— State $ $—_ $ $ $- $ - City $ $— $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255 000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $1,275,000 $ _ $ - # T 0 T A L S $_255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000_ $11275,000 �txx#�axxxx Exxxitx�t s�cxx3tx�c�axidxatxxitx#xxftx�t�cxxxxmxx♦xxrtx�H(xDixx�txxxxx�cit �txxxx/xxxxyt fw LD k ��,/ ''�. l,y LOCA TION E ' LN. " ° c=— + .. ^ 1 d• LEws✓ �Ew ZA WY4LL ST. / - s.a (- / SS kEA DOw ♦ -EL. - Sw. STS.y "le Lt. Ni« e_c K s;i:ry RarnRua crT—~' J "s ^ • eta ,% c—ES - IT sT . n ♦ 4qy� Lw.RfiN ST. �. AALNttP - /'• S `� UQ 9^., Sw. `\) r 3 SW. ERNUIST��\�4CM1rf SN. aT yf L 5W. FONNE4 -4'ST ST 'lo £V g-.ER � a ' Ye � �4'iLN� f F / I •.wt �amSs 43. –._/b � P 4 � Sw +•nRtl6 ST. f - SM. F4P1 0 ST. T sC .� `•?s ro u�.` � A C N. ST. (i d� �V- P oP 0/, S E1: OdSRA � 4w ' CAPITAL IMPROVEiiENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT : POLICE PROJECT: VEHICLE REPLACEMENTDIVISION: PATROL (112) PROJECT LOCATION: POLICE DEPT./CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace police--fleet` vehicles. Funding for this project would be from the General Fund. i - 's ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 7 automobiles (new), less resale & int. earned $66,000 Phase II FY 85-86 -1 motorcycle, 3 automobiles (new). 31,990 less resale & int. earned Phase Iii FY 86-87 5 automobiles (new), 1 motorcycle, 57,838 less resale & int. earned G a Phase IV FY 87-88 3 automobiles (retrofitted @ $5,000) less resale 14,500 ; TOTAL $170,328 t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ — $ State $ $ $ $ $_ $ City $ $ $ 170,328 . General Fund $ 66,000 $ 31,990 - $ 57 838 $$ 14,500 $$ _ $$ $ $ T O T A L S $ 66,000 `$ 31,990 $ 57L838 $ 14 500 $ i4 x#34-x-Mx-�-R-31i(-x-x-x-R-x-x-it'.(##3F�f-x-x-x-;f#id-x-x-x-x-x x'E-Dt-x•Dt-2t-x-�x'kx-x-x-x#x#-�x##-x-x-#iExiHt-tHE-x#3i-x-x-x-M ic-x-x-it#-x## LQCATIQN: , L IEMl ti_ s �� Ila /WYnll ST. 1 1 ^ w co T4 'V L�.1� ,�`. / rvx—rtnfi'WE•R st—•\�c+ " a" � �E '+ �� hh Si,^ t, 'St 4 p s� N V090 •`4T SW OvnOL da TwJ �' ? �1 sk 4 yds r`-' l I( St l p LknseEN 51 .n1 YNS • �. *Jt , �/sfr�r/��1� '� t 't S.a lOnYER__� / 4n FY .E. E +•,f ® C .T ST � �6AN Cl OEkkr OE j�,`• -1\ 4i � ,�t. �/' Sw. �YI$Y:Q li ILI IJ 'fo Ey IeL � fltiaR4 S ,. .e fir'/fN,i s�1 Ln —,P CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL t , PROJECT: PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS (215) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-SUPPORT SERVICES PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace, public works equipment. *KX-XK-K-X-XH'tx(H'i3E3tiiHH-"-1EH3EH}E#i(HHHii#M�EKY<MH3fiikH�(HDQ3i�EKHi(#YiH#H3(XAH�fHM$criit14H1EH#HK3tl(}tHMYc ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 1 Sewer Flusher Truck @ $80,000 $ 80,000 1 Dump Truck @ $32,000 - 32,000 2 3/4 T pick-up trucks @ $10,000 20,000 i 3 Small pick-up trucks @ $6,000 18,000 Phase II FY 85-86 1 TV Sewer Trailer @ $30,000 30,000 1 asphalt roller @ $11,000 11,000 . 1 van @ $12,000 12;000 assorted smaller equipment 7;000 Phase III FY 86-87 1 backhoe @'$29,000 29,000 1 1T truck @ $14,500 14;500 Y 1 Tractor @ $9,500 9,500 - assorted smaller equipment 7,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 1 dump truck 32,000 1 tractor w". articulated arm @ $28,000 28,000 ' 1 van' 12,000 1 small pick-up truck 6,000 assorted 'smaller equipment 7,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 1 street sweeper truck @ $90,000 90,000 ti... 10,0001 3L4 T pick-up truck TOTAL $455,000 . #-b£-H-H-3E#-Hi4-3E-H#H•H�(-)EiQ-)E#-##7£-Hii•rt-H-Hi(-kii-Hsc-YQ-ia-ii#=.cam=rrn:Y-SS-:-H F4�i-3(-H-H-3(-::-)4',?-H-.. ....... . . iEiE-r`E3titi:•Hi(-M�# y SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $_ $ $ State Gas Tax $ 6,000 $ 11,000 $ $ 42,000 $ 45,000 $ 104,000 General Fund $ 16,000 $ $ 31,000 $ 43,000 $ $ 90,000 Sewer Fund $ 96,000 $ 49,000 $ 14,500 $ $ 10.000 $ 169,500 SDF $ 32,000 $ $ 14,500 $ $ 45,000 $ 91,50Q T 0 T A L S $ 150,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 85,000 $ 100,000. $ 455,000 ' �(-)4-x?(-H-#��F�-N-H•H-H-H�-H-HSS-7.-iQi(-3t-?('.fi1-H-!'f=t£i(-?C-IEK-T(-H-'.f-x-DS-iFM-M-)(-H-H-k#'d-H-9E�E-li-H#-1f-H-H-i(-Dt-D(-H-Df#-N-i(-D(•2:-#',c?:-Mi<-34i1-H' LOCATION: 1 I I /- _"+' IT' � sw-.em'oi.».it: :,.5,� �t��q .g�� ; }l �)� ss 't `" • ,r .� ; �% y4L.N � �' �I ' � y4 .l \ yr.. h.AF�. `� [opyy .O`'a+ \ � ""EA Ss raxNxn '.;N NT�C,I�f¢• pl�� CI � •j / � � I _xr l�,..il j, aJRNS T k n y/ Q7_.•}y„ /�r ktas,' ! �----�- o �� _'� � � ( �y Tree xr ,: coo r` �!��\ rf�.- ^�j/ /te wA ,••'d� r E a��r, xt. �? , a Ox 4 AVN � N1, gt R. / ae9 � o' w/. /w. C'eaAk +('':��•_ �� \\+�\ `t!\ xe. ,: ' _ T , _ 5 S CAPITAL IMPROVE4, ENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER HARDWARE DEPARTMENT: FINANCE"& SERVICES DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL SUPPORT SERVICES (11.3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of the City' s current WANG OIS Model with a VS model is proposed rid the timecontinuity City to maintain and enhance staff productivity aly business. The new model, utilizing a VS processing system, would provide for d greater data storage capabilities, faster processing speeds, betterformatting options, and the addition of more work 'stat ions/terminals as needed. Funding for this project would be the General Fund: ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Lease/purchase @ $3519.76 per month $ 42,237 Phase I - FY 84-85 42,237 Phase II - FY 85-86 21,119 Phase. Ill- FY 86-87 (7/86-12/86) TOTAL $105,593 Vi-x#-3E"lE-xiE-x#x-x-�-DFBQ-`.Q#DEit3E1(-)(-x-x-xi4it-iQ-1(#x3f-If-x-x-x-x-x-DE-1(�F#�f-x3t-TFx-xi(-�H(-Acx�Fxi[-if-x�'(Pt:Q',E#x-x-x#3KH4-H-x-x�HH(-x-x'3(-x'. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL $ Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $------- $ $ City $ $_ $ $ 105,593 General Fund $ 42,237 $_ 42,237 $$ 21,119 $ $$ $ T O T A LL S $ 42,237 $ 42,237 $__21,-119 $ $ $ 105,593 LOCATION: LEw15 It ! --LL ' , EL Ri� c � e _ — _ .\• seta er. qa• �a 4 gad' {�� (((\---,,,--- sa T s. a 7.0 cu Enon�r.r�°��s •� 4r �.c � �. '( f<eti V ',ir. R tN4030 M e4a Si. f 4Pl.M I 'yEA P.4 cwr s+OSoa`�r � s st r a` � '� � yt•V4L nn �.^ n R�� W � COs C'C�' s•-`r1�...t. St Gt,/� t '''��111�� / En.• Ve9at St atlW {{��i2.LSLJ1� I- zT t, r�4 o' 4' r• a � �11 a 1 L«. i /// �c u• w�/ �� tn.COWM4 � \ L ' s• � � sa. { r "` a � u .+' � r � - � tlxaar _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRIV i PLAN! PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER EQUIP.—ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS I DIVISION: ENGINEERING (216) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ent purchasing program is proposed to update and enhance An incremental, compon handle a wider the existing computer system to range dealing ng engineering/design—oriented work assignments. Greater efficiency in with often time—consuming, civil engineering projects is an expected result ' from usage of the new equipment. More in—house engineering projects with fewer staff increases would result in greater productivity gains. Funding for this project would be the ,General Fund. x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I''— FY 84-85 WANG Graphics Scope $3,600 6,100 related software 2,500 $ Hewlett Packard Plotter (36"x48") $24,400 _ related software 3,500 27,900 Phase II — FY 85-86 - CALCOMP Ditigitizing Board $6,000 8;500 related software' 2,500 additional software (EMDS)(MDS) 7,000 4,500 Phase III — FY 86-87 additional software Phase IV — FY 87-88 additional software and work stations 10,000 4,.500 Phase V — FY 88-89 additional software TOTAL $68,500 `'. -xi1;iH+c3fi�x-x-xd#�Q-x-x-x-x-iHt-Yt-x-H-k-x-xiEiE3Q-M-§Ex-x-x#xit-x-x-xi(tiE#x-x-x-x-x-xaEx-x-d-x#-x-xi(-x-xxi(-x-x-x-x�t##x-xx-x-Si-x-DFIEx-?HE#', SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-8S TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ City $ -- $ $ $— $ $ General Fund $ 34,000 $ 15,500 _ $ 10,000 _ $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $$ 68,500 T O T A L S _ $ 34,000 $ 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500. $ 4,500 $ 68,500 �-x-x•xa�-Ds-tt-xiaas�-x-x-x-x�t-x-x-x-x-x-�c�a-x-x-�t-xx�;-x•�t 3E �txs��ax# nxx#xxxxxixttu�cxxxxr�tixx�rxxxxx� rex-a# �� `L__,•- '`� d LOCATION: ` - � � LCMS ti •pT �i /WYALL. �� „ 11 [f t f.f • a��_ as � ,,P,Y .�'. fP Sb' p`� , � 'FFjY�i-�i•1+-\. se.A.w aT. �fLwr f r, s LP b / YtL 4Y x 'a9L pj� " ¢ r sT. Rod, ar al. � n56�G1 'ZQA GC rf tt¢ 1'r`[,�. X11 L 1 d'• I 1. � GP' AA .�1-S•t.--�4-4lMA ' \ Sfv.. 11. :' �a... 'y^.o __� f YBLR'3-.� 4T..,J P i� : .�• de�i�Ii�.��- -.. . CAPITAL IMpR0VEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WORD & DATA PROCESS. TERMINAL_ DEPARTMENT: FINANCE & SERVICES' PRINTER, SECURITY SOFTWARE DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: data Purchase :of four (4) additional word processing terminals and two (2) is proposed to 'respond to greater volumes of work being processing terminals; produced and more frequent usage of existing terminals by more departments and staff. will necessitate purchase of a printer in The addition of more workstations order to 'accommodate increased output. Funding for this project would be the Genera Fund.ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 1,000 Phase I — FY 84-85 1 cashiers terminal @ na 2 word processing term inalls @ $6,000 ea. 12,OQ0 (1 support services, 1 police) 5,000 1 printer: 1,000 I security software program (police) Phase III — FY 86-87 1 word processing terminal 6,000, (Library/SupP•Serv.) 1 data processing terminal 3,000 (Accounting/other) 3,000 Phase IV — FY 87-88 1 data processing terminal 6,000 ` Phase V — 'FY 8G-89 1 word processing terminal TOTAL : $ 37,000 �.x a xx tt xx x#x x 2Fti x xiE#x x l AF3E�(Dt tt#x i Af#)t x #x K xiFDEii#x#x tE x#x x#x)E�t x x x l�k x x x x#x#x x—Xx x x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL _ Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ City $— $ $ General Fund '$_Ir000= $ 18,000 $_ 9 000- $ 3,000 $ 6,000 37,000 = T 0 T A L S $ 1,000 $ 18,000 $ 9,000 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 $ 37,000 ##x-x#M'f.#x-x-xiii:#7F-H-x 3t-K#x-x-X-xx-3(-x-x-�iE?t-x x x-1E Q Ya➢HQ A��(�DE#3t#x x Iti(3#�f#if�t if x#it x rH£x3Eif Di#iEiti(#PHtiE'�lt#x _ y Lu V (S LOCATION: ''___ /� , , \ LN a%G[ „w ♦a a �I '"V�� w ^i f r ar`•r � EC.vva�2: �-��rro �,q•�d4' 'a t�� Sri^ Imo- 4 ST (y y� � d k �• VM T Aa �f�,.-�u 5 •t�' ill u v/J �. ys. a*♦�� dr °a ,F♦��,� I �� B�ib4 vs J �b as - t• tw. r4'^£ •�� L!pSY.r�t ° ss �y♦ �t Sy,�C, rl // ,t \ ST. -1 �.J},°/�Si 6 Ta r 9M1 SA '��D/V '1 {',♦ /. Lw.• bMMt ST saag T r r ^tiA ljj)))///d Q` a p / C'r ` f' , sib 4M 6 Ow. ' .•s ♦ 0aaaJla e s - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DEVIL PROJECT: PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER-LIBRARY DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (1'41) PROJECT LOCATION: LIBRARY ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Lease/purchase of a small" micro—computer is proposed for public use on an in-Library, rental basis. Purchase of such a unit would be for community access and education, as well as small—business familiarization and use. Access would be on a timed fee basis. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. -3(-H-k M-H-Hii--Hi(-H-H-H-H#H-3Q-H-H-I*rH-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-i(-H-H-H H#H-H-H-iQ-�H-H-H-HiEdE#D(-H-H-H 3(H-H-H H-H-H)EY�t-H-H-H 3E-H-H HHS(-HDfif-DFX , ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: s small micro—computer, screen, disc drive, printer $ 2,000 TOTAL $ 2,000 #�HE#1-3¢#-Hi:-H-H-�E3<-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-H-HH-tFH-H-H-H-X-H-H-H-Pf-H-Df-t(#H#H-H#Hao-Yc�(-H#H#it-)EH-H3E#H#DEiE-3FH-Yi#H-H-H-H-YEAH#-H#H-H-H-.`E-H#-1E : SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 ' TOTAL S Federal State City $ _ $ $_ $ $ �� $ General Fund $ $ 2,000 $ $ $ $ 2,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ 21000 $ — $_ _ _$ $ 2,000 Y �3E#H-14M-::-if-H�#H-DFH#H-:E3:.i(-H-3E3t#HifH-M-Hi(JiQ#H#H-Had-H#H-H-)fif-'rEX-H-DY.(MH-H-N-H�Hf-H-H-H-u_-H-H-k#-?i-H-H#3EM-i43^EH-H3i-H-)i-H3(# r. LOCATION: 1 LEWIx 4 TMtU �v 11 i La. a. 1' �vC gi,s. aW rxticc aa. : Ir,{� f:rhosr y a- .. Li $ ! �.� p _' r x!a CT. J,1 vfr gyy fv.uw tr`I an-N aW1 q. J<e•- �' d Jr NTAapga !-. L J SIQ To j Q+ dd r c w Wq' _a y • � dy x Stl � �, �A'�� J �Q �/ n\'SF x.L,H t[ L4aM[H 31 Nv' G�W : l a �4 Tr � Jt ST- �^`• a rA G%" sqT r" r tl 1 �� #' j ,,'0-. a�. •.:1. �'/is f.v. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 'PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL -- PROJECT: OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION: ALL PROJECT LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace office equipment as needed to maintain and increase staff productivity. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. 3E-x-3E-x##-x#ii-x-3f•3F#-it-xiExiE-�f•3Ht32-x-x-x-)E-x#-3S3t-x-x)Fx-x-x-3t-x#-x�t-xaf-#-M-x-x3i-X-x-x-x#at-!ci(-x-�-x-x-x-H-x-x-�(-x-fit-lF#3(-#-ft-N-x-DF x#-M ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: typewriter replacemants @$1,000 ea./1 per FY $ 5,000 photo copiers;@ $2,000/FY 84-85 Library 6,000 FY '85-86 Administration FY 86-87 Police adding machines/calculators @ $250/2 in FY 84-85 1,500 2 in FY 86-•87 2 in FY 88-89 dictation system - 6 dictaphones @ $200, 2 500 2-transcribers @ $650 ea FY 85-86 4 dictaphones,- 2 transcribers, FY 87-88 2 dictaphones TOTAL $ 15,000 .x-D43E-?f#iE•D(��iciE#x-!(##-H-:t-#-D4-x3F3E3t-x#-x-H-xit-x-JE-x-x-x x-3F#-x-x-x3f-M-)t-M-x•#-x-)t-x-x-x•#-#-!(-M-x-x-x�t-x-x-�t-M-H-x-x-x-k-x-xiE-x�(-x-x-)E-x-H SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $-- City -City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 3,500 $_ 3,10 $ 3,500 $ 1,400 $$ 3,500 $$ 15,000 T 0 T L S $ 3,500 $ 3,100 $ 3,500 $ 1,4010 $ 31500 $ 15,000 #-Yc-[THH(-H-()�€i(-M-IQ#Yd-3t-Y-�-X-)Q-Dd-x7(-iE-x3(it-YHt•?(�HHt-M-M-x-M-3t-x-3(-K-D:-Xitid-M•'.f-M•Mi43a'�E#i4�(•#-3E#if3fi(-x#M#x�£-NciE#-IHE#�(-M�iE3(-#-x'h-Mif• '/t++ ION -+ ` lf,V13 ...... ��4� � + =� C °1 lh. •r �: S li Wvall ST sr..'•Yr.xa «l� /� .-'----sr. � �_ eN � s ss � � ••j t - '^ :.i IlP •t sa Cr. fq <w (P / '-' '�.i�� - •�.��.�� • I,arT P ice.. c 9 'o+.lT Cf WCP"fi'•�ne' !tl M 1 l S+a Y KaC� •�.�'C� i atMllT. �fT.N CT. v sP /\ cry [r ayl, Sr.aw sr. ♦ cat °' <e�,a•0 ('tlV� 'ar 4ffi i, etn'eoso rn, a i-:„' ;ie �_ se \ S♦ �,, r' �g t�' o$Oe p Yt�_. eaa•e3r -..ams waa � � p <� r, S am [.r♦W,X a � R j Sx Gq MT �.[. W Ln J�' e + 11P a9�'��►/T)a, -9 f`�\ ♦ ♦ r �� sr �.` eennnee�a)11 ^ [.timed i \ •r'•� _/-.(0�r'+',L!'�7^J \ �3 tll `, SA ,0'y� $ y � r g lef .•dir' tlr w%. `�/99I �M O'NIAA� _ ' \ ��.—. i .t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY € PROJECT: BOOKS, MATERIALS DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (141) PROJECT LOCATION LIBRARY � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: E A five percent (5%) net expansion of new books and materials is sought for the z ' This addition` of Lbrary`materials will include the purchase of City Library' ers, cassettes, and records as well as the new books,' magazines, newspapers, replacement of old and worn materials. Funding for this project would be the General Fund. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $150,000 $30,000 per year @ 5 years ±, 6 TOTAL $150,000 bHE##txxxxxMi4x'�t34iE#x�F #'�#-�t•#-x#-x-�-xit-s��-x-x�#-xx-x-x�-tE#�t-xSC#H-E#-Dx-U�-L�-E AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL_ ° FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 85=7 FY 87-88 FY 6_8—B9 $ $ Federal State $ $ $ $ $ $ Cit General Fund $ 30,000 $$ 30 $$ 30,000 _ $$ 3 Q $$ 30.000 $ 150,000 $ $-- $ _1_0 T A L S $ 30 000 $ 30.000 $ 30,000_ $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 N: i! l,; s. A LOCATIO "1 Q nK Tom!';° - ^�' j NE.D�T Q ir. � • a _ ��.,rrr��"...888\\\iii^^ ar r• i'C.y 4 .Ro cs rq w •d �- _ *T� aw iT s. („st'" nr a' N + sc •tr.N opo. PLI so l• �� NAY r. MW ,- ANN sT. R ee`. ' ca>• w � -�nws ' � / Her E` i.e.a�srttrt♦ 0,11 TO AaTn sr _ ♦ _ S v fONNE9 � / x M piRRT 'f9�� ^ ,' 0• �� /•// Sm. V.W!R ST r-7 I n • L Cv ♦ / d "' !! lR. f 4;T'a ! -t. J 5.9. OL6R4 ' �\ E R'! + . so. $M� w�- � _ >. �. �� s �� .' ma...._. - - - low t f 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAU PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PROJECT: CIVIC CLNfE.R DIVISION: PROJECT LOCATION: Tektronix building adjoining City Hall, at Ash Ave, & s Barnham St• is proposed to consolidate a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase of building government activities andeagen the relievecrald ofblic while"Pcsavinylci.axp dollaaces rs separated lost to 1 buildings, and better continually rising rental charges. Library 15,000 sq. The allocation of "division space would be as follows: ft (2Ory s ft. (45%); Police - 10,924 sq. ft (35%); Administrataon- 7,250 sq. ) Funding for purchase of new Civic Center would be from General Fund #it)F#3t1(x)t�dxxM�1#xxxx#x3(}(xx1(xxR�4x)(xxx-xH-x-K*-X- -xxxxx#x##xx#�4ltxxxxxx xxK#)lxxxxxxx�Exxx# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST`. F Purchase of building for new Civic Center $2,200,000 ($255,000 allocated per yr•) . TOTAL $2,200,000r X-"-**x x-x x x-x3S#x# x-x-xiEK-1(x-x3( SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 _ FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-8 A_- FY 88-89 _ TOTAL Federal State $- $ $ $ r $ $— $ $ : General Fund $ 255,000 $ 255 O00 $. 2551000 0 00 $ 255 000 $ 255 000_ 1 275,00 4 $_255 000 $ 255 000 $ 255 000 $ 255000 $ 255 000 $1,275,00 �i-x-x-x-x#-x##-YFYt#itit-xx-x-xiFif-x-x-x-}(-x-tw'ix-x-x�ix-x#-�-x•iQ-xH-x-x#-xiE-1(-x-3t-x-x-x-x-x#-xH-x-x-x-xx-x-x' LOCATICDN l , E teats IT. _ _ l I tNsw Tvu,f °' i1 s.W. 3 t.� __IN i\", EL PL • Jb i" J''{�=�+�*^\.,f I I Oaf't�H / {•�'Rifflla FRH IT 0. S PSV W5T .}p}. Ayq ST. Y W _ CRHOL ST_. 4 ,f AL @ Sts f IRJ _ 91' a SW. fCNHtA' 5P Ra Nt& / ✓ Sv. Ant ST - ~�V ' f1A_ IT C C Pta , E s a ear sr. .�1� ", ; 7 ,. a G. ! � r ,y .✓ C %�� `:_._'^•revs CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: <VEHICLE REPIACEMENI DEPARTMENT : POLICEDIVISION: PATROL (112) PROJECT LOCATION: POLICE DEPT ./C1VIC CENTER- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace police-fleet vehicles: ect would be from the General Fund. Funding for this proj id-}E x-x-1FX-i(-x-x-X-3Fx-x x#Df#it-x-x#x x#-X-3Ex-x-X-X31-x-�x-XiE-xiFx##X-x-xi(-x�(-3t-K-x xiHE-x�(-H-X�{-x-M-x-X-x-M i(-X#X#X#x x-x-D(-DHF x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 66,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 7 automobiles (new), less resale & int.'; earned Phase II - FY II5-86 1 motorcycle, 3` automobiles (new), 31,990 less resale & int. earned phase iII - FY 86-87 5 automobiles (new), 1 motorcycle, 57,838 less resale & int. earned Phase IV - FY 87-88 3 automobiles (retrofitted @ $5,000) less resale 14,500 TOTAL $170,328 x#�EiE�FN-3�iE'M-X-x`'Mx-x-x�£-X-iEN-DE-x-xiEX-x�H4-ii-X#xit)4-?4-S(-x-x-?EiQ�t-X#�X-�F-bHE-X•x-1f-DE#x##-DE-3(-3Hti1''k-x-x-xiEiE-H-x-l4-X-SHt�f Xx�{-x-x'k SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 84-85 FY 85_-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89_ Federal $ $ $ $ $ $-------- State City $-1 8 General Fund $ 66,000 31 990 $ 57,838 $$ 14 500 $$�— 170,328 T 0 T A L S $ 6_5.000 $ 31,990 $ 57,838_ $ 14,500 $ — x-x-X##lc x-x-x-X-x-xx-Xx-x-X# -x#iiif-x-x#xi{#xiFx-x#X-x-x#3(-X�t;(-3f-1E-9(-X-X3FX�EE#-X-x-x#Nc#i<x-x-P(v#{X-x-EFH�V�-1� LOCATION: AL kb car.' ro \f9 Jy� ST. ��• £w, !�'�R-� S,' l�r+.Y s ` , .Tj �� ;��i t9` M1 _ —y� 1� - � 4 ♦� / rr w QF � 94yY C+aMCa ST ♦aiMf , .P�.. � �} Cf;'� �.rf..... 'I}, Z � V % iw.• YAfwf 3' I a 'rncy ffi'� 7cook / f.. j .cp /� S oL4rA •\ f . ` tw + _ fes- r^ f p,1 fT a 8'/ ' R � !:*\a� , ! �• � � ,, Ow[a AY 6.� �� nr� �Tf-�w►i � e CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAA! PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT : PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS (215) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-SUPPORT SERVICES PROJECT LOCATION:- PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace Public works equipment. �u r c X x�Ee/ )(x x x)(M jf x x x x D(x#x x�(3f#x''1 xyY k IE x#iS�E#�➢F x x N x}i%if x jS x f x 3!#it x�(it#x�f x j(i(3()F#N 1t x�t H x xi(# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 80,000 Phase T --FY 84-85 1 Sewer Flusher Truck @ $80,000 32,000 _1 Dump Truck @ $32,000 20,000 2 3/4 T pick-up trucks @ $10,000 18,000 3 Small pick-up trucks '@ $6,000 30,000 Phase II FY 85-86 1 TV Sewer Trailer @ $30,000 11,000 I asphalt roller,@ $11,000 12,000 1 van @ $12,000 7,000 assorted smaller equipment 29,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 1 backhoe @ $29,000 14,500 1 1T truck -@ $14,500 9,500 1 Tractor @ $9,500 7,000 assorted smaller equipment 32,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 1 dump truck 28,000 1 tractor w. articulated arm @ $28;000 12,000 1 Vail 6,000 1 small pick-up truck 7,000 assorted smaller equipment gp 000 Phase V - FY 88-89 1 street sweeper truck @ $90,000 10,000 1 3/4 T pick-up truck TOTAL 0$455,000 x�E34-t4-x:'t�-?(-x'�-la-D4#x##-x-)t-sQ-x-x-tHt##i4i0E�it-x-x-#3f-xiE-3E'E#jE-x-x#'rE-x 3(�-x-x#14-,� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86_ FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ 42,000 $ 45 000 $ 104,000 State Gas Tax $ 6,000 _ $$ 11,000 $$ --- $ $ $ City ' $ 31,000. $ 43000 $ $ 901000 General Fund $ 16,000 $_ $ $ 10,000 $ 169,500 Sewer Fund $ 96,000 $ 49,000 $ 14,500 $�- $ 45,000 $ 91,500 SDF $ 32,000 $ $ 14,500 $____-___- T 0 T A L S_ $ 150 000 $_60.00.0 $ 60,000 $ 85,900 $ 100,000,._ $ 455,000 taxxxxxx'1H4xM 3Ei(DEx 4xxxx#xii3414-x-* #i£-x'+t-x�f�t4-lex-x-k-DfEt-x-x-x-lFx-it-s4-x#x-xiHi-x-x-x-x-M-lf-x-x�f - LOCATION: 1 E t'Y �h ' n>nm cT* f9 a,,f R♦T f\ YP � c Sn lY fT. GT. a 4 Sp, � �ST~ b tTc tT 4t 4 ,�^ N PLPYOJO WRY SW.anN iT 9 ♦♦�..^- M 6� �-4 tT � �\:. \ � ♦ 4 � S t' �$ �i aa9r a� �� ;III[ - - \\\''VVVI/I b 4. � ; \\��\,,�YY9,,RLLL ll`.��• is wi,oi sr YP ��♦°� vad a .} /� tt \ PU � ST RR.£n � ATxyi Pte, ♦ ET <. .rti t4_ / lc r eVI p,r1T, cn tT.. 0?OP�I 1 0£nay DC u 0.4@t 0 r iffim 0, M1: Cr/+ ♦ � r nl.-- P r/M♦1i.P P., 8 � t LF. Ohtani \\l SN t' ♦ CF' �J J C, ty ♦ PV sr. rte ~ M,` `.-.-s. s .a m� - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER HARDWARE: DEPARTMENT: FINANCE &SERVICES DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL t. rPROJECT DESCRIPTION: is model Replacement of the City's Curren ctivNG OIS ity ande the ltt melys continuity pofpCity a to maintain' and enhance staff p odu a VS processing system, would prov business. The new model, ide far utilizing ` faster processing speeds, better formatting greater data storage capabilities, options, and the addition of more work stations/terminals as needed. Funding for this 'project would be the General Fund. �c-x-x-�-x-x��c-x-x-x-x-x xxx�xac-x-�x xx x-x x�x-x�c-xx-x�c x x-x-x-xx-x-x�-t��x'x x-x->F�x-x xx x-x#xx-x�c-x xx x x-x-xx-x-x x x-x-x x � ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Lease/purchase @ $3519.76 per month $ 42,237 -_phase I — FY 84-85 42,237 Phase II — FY 85-86 21,119 ` Phase III FY 86-87 (7/86-12/86) TOTAL #x�(#-x-3(aE x-x-x#Yt-DF-x-x-x H'x-x'�E-x-1(-x-x-D(ii-x-x�S-if��-x-x#x-)i#x-x-K-x-S(#x-x�E#x-xiHHEx-x#x'3f#1HE-x �i#2d-x-x-?E-x�d x-3E g x'AExDH( SCHEDULE AND FUNDI(JG PLAN TOTAL FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 85-87_ FY 8 -88 FY8_ 8=._._89 Federal State $ $ City $ $_ $ 105,593 General Fund $ 42,237 $ 42,237 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $_105,59 3 T O T A L S $ 42,237. $ 42,237 $ 21,119 $ $ �.�#x-x-)Ex-x�iE�Fx-1t-x-x-x-�#x-3t#x-xi4df#x-x-x#at-if �F-iFx-9(-x�(-D�rd�xi(-x#x#T4jE�i-3t-YYrtx-x'#x-x-xiEx-x-x'3t-xxx�iS-itd(-xx-x-x-x-x-x-x � _ ��/ �' i' :� LOCATION: C LEPIS �I �1 OUWLt ST S. s EA EL i jf Y.iMa _----sa� i•L. ,fpr, 1' ,O c / 0 Sq 1 ST. A: C^T•.'C'Cti /� CO,.� Say �Cp,.USU � A>�N1,T• S'b5 � M 4 j' �$ 1 Oy N l sv._.GM1oi._-si •Styr �� ♦ A O b VJ '` V� Y-0 s � 2 +�- sT sem. ftTNN 4„e` G;ya. ,_ s n• env. + r /' _\ —N-1 ,yii.� 4? s/. �` 4N. 05!111• �I \ \\\ Sg t. fJ S''p } / CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT Or-TAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER EQUIP.--ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: ENGINEERING (216) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An incremental, component purchasing program is proposed to update and enhance the existing computer system to handle a wider range of engineering/design-oriented work assignments." Greater efficiency in dealing with often time-consuming, civil engineering projects is an ;expected result from usage` of the new equipment. More in-house engineering projects with fewer staff increases would result in greater; productivity' gains. Funding for this project would be the General ,Fund. �-K-)�3E�F�(�rH#-1E•�E-Df-DHf-x3Htit-)E-xiS-M DE-x-u'k-M34-x-f4H-?S3F-M#Xr3t-M-D(-xiE-iE3tiFx-°E�(-x-YHE34-x-�Hf-M-#-)<3H(-xit#H#ifX-)f ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase' I - FY 84=85 WANG Graphics Scope $3,600 related software 2,500 $ 6,100 Hewlett Packard Plotter (36"x48") $24,400 related software 3,500 27,900 Phase II - FY 85-86 CALCOMP Ditigitizing Board $6,000 8,500 related software 2,500 additional software (EMDS)(MDS) 7,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 additional software 4,500 e Phase IV - FY-87-88 additional software and work stations 10,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 additional software 4,500 TOTAL $68,500 •B'i-#-ttii-X-3t'�i(-3HE-tEDf-x-D4-14-t#-A(-M-3t i1 Yc#i(�-1�-1Q-x-4F#'D('d-�-DHEi4-3(D(3t-�-it-##�E-H-9Fi:-)EDE/(-n-�c-n�r=rr+-DE-x-X-Df-Mit'lE-1EiE3:#3d-dFX�H�"x� } . SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $— $ — $_ $ $ State $ $ $ $__$_ $ $ City $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 34,000 $ 15,500 $ 10 000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 68,500 T O T _A_L S $ 34,000 $. 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500_ $ 68,500 ff 1 z��tt��at�-r{�t,-�•�c x-1tit�s-��;;f��kxc�tc-3�-x-sz-ss-x-�cac-n�-x mat-x-x-K-x�x-x-� _ LOCATION: 1 ° LOOS � 11• /Dove LL LL zT. a ` ` '•.tel,� ��I '� rG4[gKr 4T. wwaY.T•R ,1 sii + PL. # 9 —.✓ 9`z;`+ RAA CT. ,tp f9 ?r � �_ TO „„rr v�([' M✓a�W !qD ` � yrs ttl C eCCCC � .t\ � i �P !•,eaa tT. i � SVS � ' Yep i C,,lYCY zv .4 tl: Y 4a 4 s ,+�• J� / ^f � _ ,te tT. <TL 4 t4 P' •CDS � �;pr,...wt m. 44D �. HI D ^` LIQ � �..CM-1� / P L \�Yf d•4 �4�..� A y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WORD & DATA PROCESS. TERMINAL DEPARTMENT: FINANCE & SERVICES PRINTER, SECURITY SOFTWARE DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL- SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: data Purchase of four (4) ,additional word processing terminals and two (2) processing, terminals,; is proposed to respond to greater 'volumes of work being produced and more frequent usage of existing terminals by more departments and staff. The addition of more workstations will necessitate purchase of a printer in order to accommodate increased output. Funding for this project would be the General Fund.#�#►��x��cx't � �� ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 1,DOO Phase I – FY 84-85 1 cashiers terminal $1,000 2 word processing terminals @ $6,000 ea. 12,000 (1 support services, 1 police) 5,000 1 printer 1,000 l security_software program (police) Phase III – FY 86-87 '1 word processing terminal 6,000 (Library/Supp.Serv'.) 1 data processing terminal 3;000 (Accounting/other) 3;000 Phase IV FY 87-88 1 data processing terminal 6,000 Phase V FY 88-89 '1 word processing terminal TOTAL $ 37,000 H-3FiFx'uiEr'(-M-ii-3t-3FDFx-1E-DS�!-�(Dc-1t-X3Ht-Mai-H�YFK-St-}�14-�E-?f3�1(`3E#-K-M-Yr.E.(-)t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 88-89 TOTAL FY 64-85 FY 85-86^ FY 86-87 FY 87-88 $ $ $ $ Federal $ �$— $ $ $ $ State _ $ `_ � � $ $ City $_ 000 $_ 6.000 $ ,0 3700 1 General Fund $_ 000 $ 18,00 $ 0 $$ 98000 $ 3, $ $ $ — T 0 T A L S $ 1 000 $- 18,000 $ 9,000 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 $---3-7,000 M3YDI3HE M3Sii M)?tE M x�Ht#SHt'�t #Mi(M M'e('#1-�( #M M M AAZ M x M u rE LOCATION' Ilk�1 I " � i - 11 Cwig 1. �1... E + *T. r, ��` ¢y J" }•f \�' EA tT. a '^a9 iuil a }i T S.J a �p Fin 5T. =s � t�� ,.��r f�� x¢•3.1, 9yyt s ( °' sr to T "R��JY/n�,(.,�"Gt.e. �- '" •• m 9� 6r^,p(3' J .:r. "yrs tr• .y J' F'ts��'J• tT. T't nx B 4t ,i4 / ib.• YLRNE,1T SEE AO e• yt 1 ` } ? ` } ♦rrr444�.. °♦ '�S n ♦n //(J _ r 4�t ♦.�. ♦F .}., ^ � AEf( 1 @t.. f •a �/ � OOp'!/. tn. OSIb14 - l 6p i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION: ALL PROJECT LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace office equipment as needed to maintain and increase staff productivity. Funding for this project would be the General Fund`. • -�-Mat-x-x-xi4�'-it-x-K-M'ick(-x�(-x�Ex-H-xi4-x-M3(-lc-)t-x�t-k-x�t-tt-K-x-x-lHt-x-##if-x-x-i{-Y�iFfHt-M-x-24�Fx-x•x-x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: typewriter replacements @ $1,000 ea./l per FY $ 5,000 photo copiers'<@ $2,000/FY'84-85-Library, 6,000 FY'`85-86' Administration FY 86-87 Police adding machines/calculators @ $250/2 in FY 84-85 1,500 2 in FY 86-87 2 in FY 58-89 dictation system — 6 dictaphones,@ $200, 2 transcribers @ $650 ea 2,500 FY 85-86 4 dictaphones, ',2 transcribers, FY 87-88 2 dictaphones TOTAL $ 25,000 -�#-p(�-�M-M�x#-K M-x-2g-x-1Hi'lf-H-M-?Ht-x'k#�#x-x-aEi'rYc-3�-:f#if-%-x-at-Y-3QitiFKiEi(it-M-#Q#Hi:3E#�-}Ex X-xiE#It-#if xa4-3E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-8 TOTAL Federal State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $_3,500 $ 3,100 $ 31500 $ 1,400 $ 3,500 $$ 15,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T O T A L S $ 2,500 $ 3,100 $ 3,500 $ 1,400 '$--3,,-5-00 $ 15,000 IQN "o ' r � .°.f'•xYr..eses�'�` ,�"� 14�' „£FAPW ' °�� c �� t t � �) .T. "�s�J' '•O 60 P f �i 1Y W • + i • cT.n '�, sw, r� rNw+PfP r4 _ �� 1 � Jr ✓ � "Fp�,1 aP rw � (I O;•1F p t0 a ,y f t, fAP = .i eat r r •'Ja ^ 1 to va,n n � � `'�' ai �%� @, o• � 6` / ,fry�+r�' .G; c sr ��Ct ca Pf _ $ 'l• bare s a tm. wtdea as � 4,){ •i i •r. � ,!Z'v j. 'fir, • Gs.�< PSe,w• a . • uacet cL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: BOOKS, MATERIALS DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (141) PROJECT LOCATION: LIBRARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A five percent (5%) net expansion of new books and materials; is sought for the City Library. This addition of Library materials will include the purchase of new books, magazines, newspapers, cassettes, and records as well as the replacement of old and worn materials.' Funding for this project would be the General Fund. �iF'�-M-BE'�-M###-Zt#:tom-x-Hiditi£#H-)E-MidiF#M�(N-x3F�if3EiHf-i4-Di-lf-1E-�-xit-�E�E3�Di#it-€tiE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $30,000 per year @ 5`years $150,000 TOTAL $150,000` �; - •##M•#�Eid-ircir".�y:€#DI-1£ #?H(#3F�(##�(#M#K�-1t�#JFM-M M-?E-M i�/t`�-Ki£-M#iE-DHA#M-X-D4-M-lt-Nif�d-EEi(-Dfi-DE•iEM• SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ �` State $ $ — $ City $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ "s0L000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $_ 150,000 T O T A L S $ 30000 + 30,OOtT $---30 .000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 RIX it Mftr1�E�3Es�x3r34� Ti v � d a C. it, T �S9~ E sr O 4M1. SW SYf.eMH Si. w •.tea n y ° �I,$ rC Nf-vy03p A` "ZZ ru ' w 0 Sl. C e E4}MEw =W4THMS iW/6NH R .a Rdb4• �f a \yy..RRo s 4 1�.lAr.ITt T, . �� 54. + G h, K ® V+ .J •RG4 SW. YARNS ST. �- (` ~sr. d0 (V W 1 1 alt lR. Y yKR* od 2" C• US/Mh rt ._, / ,_,,. .....Ill or-m s-c•. , 1•'�.��r°_�.._. CAPITAL impRoVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT: DETAIL PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER DEPARTMENT: DIVISION:'' PROJECT LOCATION: Tektronix building ' adjoining 'City Hall, ,at Ash Ave. & Burnham St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase of building is proposed to consolidate government activities :and agencies, relieve cramped office spaces in separated buildings,; and better serve the public while saving tax dollars lost to continually rising rental charges: The 'allocation of division: space would be as follows: Library — 15,000 sq. ft. (45%); ;Police — 10,924 sq. ft (35%) Administration— 7,250 sq. ft.`(20%). r Funding ;for purchase of new,Civic;Center would be from General Fund. �-�t•�-x�t-a€-�#-�-x-r,-six-x-x-x-x-�rx-sic-x-x-xx-x-x�t�c-x�x-xat�c-x-x-x-x�t-x-x-x;Fx�-x-x-x-�-x��-xaE�t-x-x-x�c-x�•x-x•x-xx-x-x•x-x�-x-�c-x-x-x-* . ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Purchase of building for new Civic Center $2,200,000 ($255,`000 allocated per yr.) TOTAL $2,200,000 3HE#x-xii-D4-xFx x-x#x#?E�'-D(-x-K�(-xiEx-x#x-x-k x x-YS-x-DFx-x�-xiE-YE-x-x-YHS-x#x-x�hx-�lEi(-x3HQ-x-K 3Ex#x-x-14-x•iEX�#x-xi{#x-D(-x�-x�r� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY- 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $; $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 255,000_ $ 2551000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $$ 255,000 $1,275,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 255.000 $ 255,000 $ 255 ,000 _.$ 255,000 $ 255,000 $1,275,00 xxxxxxacxxx �ta�x�xxx i6CDtki1#'.�xt(J(it�E#xx�(� x'3S�txDfxD£xD('3(x #3( # xxxif3SY£x�FRylfi�i��iu a t Gam, L l�d �� i �.R L IS ,.. �C�„I 'a� �`�` ��i�yyyy•�'�^� tl �Y4LL ST. TT- LOCATION YJIn6a 4 $ g e 1 1 C R f C K • RR�•Tf�.�M1 ST. ST. •O CT. a .' XIIS �Si.w _� �^t AMR ST. QRL NH tF P/f Tl $ } .P HWH4Jp' ;•R Sw. PAROL. S� �! ,�'L.,]' 9pa fir? W f � .V �4 < *+�•. 'l F y f-1 ((-- Aw LT f95R St. �S tl. : p� 'F�• i5 y ®�k. /� ST. =wAiRIRS +J4 s r (, ALRL S.w TORR R RT- 4I S Aa.•t.Yt Y.`"`a tt ST. .AWS'IIA Y !•/,/�¢!K"� i1 t. Sv. t MB ST, g $ w S.O. FfA4L ti. 1 / !!! l"P �J \ dry•_” - /Led � '}9 (•� f S f \`1PIR ST. lv. ZVI i• ®• / 8 Ms 1 LM. �/S'�7.`'M � OCF.J„ /°l`.i. i S t, R` }O /a Sw.' A, (� I ST �'v /P 14�+•' p �a�, jp. 9�1.4RM1 1 - ! SO t CAPITAL IMPROVOjENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: POLICE PROJECT: VEHICLE REPLACEMENT DIVISION: PATROL (112) PROJECT LOCATION: POLICE DEPT./CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace Police—fleet vehicles. Funding for this project would be from the General Fund. 9EiQ M It# DE3t M M yHE3H(tt 1HS M 1(H ESTIMATE OF'PROJECT COST: less resale & int. earned $66,000 Phase I — FY 84-85 7 automobiles (newt Phase II FY 85-86 l motorcycle, 3 automobiles (new)' 31,990 less resale & int. earned cle, new), 1 motorcy 57,838 Phase FY 86-87 less automobiles resale & int. earned less resale 14,50 ., _' FY 87=88 3 automobiles (retrofitted @ $5,000) Phase IV $170,328 TOTALxMutt�E#x x# -Mi4#M3E�-iFM:€iF��`-M-)t-k-it#X#HiE3HEii-k�t�it'iE#x-x3Ei(H SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 84-88 FY85__—86, FY_86_—=—87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 __------ $_ $— -- $-----"_ Federal $----- --- $ $- - $- $ $ State $-- $ $ --- — $ 170,328 General Fund. $ 66.000 $ 31 99Q_ 57.838 $ 1 �= ---_� $�_ $__--- $ 1�9 T O TA�_S $ 66,000 $ 31,990 $ 57,838 $__I 4,500 $_�— _ LOCATI(1N: , LCQIt jl��•(((��Tfff�.!!•1 WVRLL CT. I ; LII. •HC-L _ p L w A�`!!{�U 1, ST. p. �ifYTNE 1• lr�p,� ..... d. SM , 4CP T 1 .1•l / �.i �� p. L 66FF.��77 1at.� LY CT rc 5 �r t n0 A ST, � A .//''�� rr �, SIt.RIOT . `�Q'�� , N 4 y pt Yo L f TO FM 7. 1111111 Egg mr-q- ✓ 44 4t sr O �k_Y 4 L'4at l [APNfM 4t =ORta M3 N N —•yr....e ti T p+KL ' ('�a�', Y� OT t.`Y•t / SS. YWHt ST I y ro �n � x I iT. A 1� 6 9p ~ '•�//S ��1 •=/ LNZSIIY �� v •e /.. a .. w 1 : Ct' 5 r- r CAPITAL IMPROVEMEftT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS (215) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-SUPPORT SERVICES PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: equipment. xxxxx Purchase/replace public works eq P s,M. x�Ex}E#xXx�Exx�(HtxLtxMjEiElS�3l�1x�ExxxxDF: xitSEl(�(�Fxx M#PSit Dt#x?E4(')E3f ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 60,000 s Phase I - FY 84-85 1 Sewer Flusher Truck @ $80,000 32,000 1 Dump Truck @ $32,000 20,000 2 3/4 T pick-up trucks @ $10,000 18,000 3 Small pick-up trucks @ $6,000 30,000 30,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 1' TV Sewer Trailer @ $ 11,000 1 asphalt roller @ $11,000 12,000 1' van @ $12,000 7,000 . assorted smaller equipment 29,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 1 backhoe @ $29,000 14,500 1 IT truck @ $14,500 9,,500 1 Tractor @ $9,500 7,000 assorted smaller equipment 32,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 1 dump truck 28,000 28,000 r, 1-tractor w1 articulated arm @ $ 12;000 1 van r 6,000 1 small pick-up truck 7,000 assorted 'smaller equipment 90,000 e Phase V FY 88-89 1 street sweeper struck @ $90,000 10,000 t 1 3/4 T Pick-up truck $455,000 TOTAL lE x#3E x#x#iE �tx#�t est t �t#u .......... SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN -_ TOTAL FY 84-85 FY 85-8b FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 Federal $________-- $ $ 42 00 0 $ 4545 0 ODOo_ $ 1 O State Gas Tax $____6,000_. $__1_1_.,_00O $$______- $- $- $_ City $._ $ 0�00 $ 43 000 $�_ $ OOs 00 General Fund $___L6,000 $--- $ 3---=---- $ 10 000 $_ 16 59,00 Sewer Fund $ 96,000 Y"$ 4.2- `' 14,500 $______ - 45,000_ $ 91•500 3 2.`000 $�_ $_14.500 $_-____ _ $ SDF $------ T O T_A L S $-1-5 0-,-()-O - $ 60,00 $_ 60 000 $ 65,000 $ 100,000 $ 455,0 00 .�a.�t-; •r�#x�-x�#x#x-x#r�#x-x-x-x x-��#x#x#x-�c#�x#�� LOCATION tP.N � Rig!. •9l'/7 �i (�.¢'(5 'l�J S/ wav JPLw11P hV� 'if 09y tW_ 1 $ f Il ga a TO ty \ ! Rl'! aT - RTPwfi 'P �•� �� ;. CPPMCq A. .Pl d /. tel`TiWTIIT oPl G.•'ai.G / >/ i P , sr. VaPgt sr. 4 .., A ;R ' � � O �;1 GM. # ! I f'/ n�.� � pR 4d�_ M1-r. OmnP• � �.. ...f.�w ��RY'1 a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER EQUIP.-ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS 3 DIVISION: ENGINEERING ;(216) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT" DESCRIPTION: An incremental, component purchasing program is proposed to update and enhance a the existing computer system to handle a wider range of l engineering/design-oriented work assignments.- Greater efficiency in dealing with ;often time-consuming, civil 'engineering' projects is an expected result from usage - of the new equipment. More in-house -engineering projects with d result in greater productivity; gains. Fewer staff increases woulp Funding for this project would be the General Fund. jtxatxx3tx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I = FY 84-85 WANG Graphics Scope $3,600 related software 2,500 $ 6,100 a Hewlett Packard Plotter;(36"x48") $24,400 related software 3,500 27,900 Phase II - FY 85-86 CALCOMP Ditigitizing Board $6,000 , 8500 related software 2,500 4 7,000 additional software (EMDS)(MDS) 4,500 Y Phase III - FY 86-87 additional software 10,000 Phase IV .- FY 87-88 additional software and work stations 4;500 Phase V FY 88-89 additional software TOTAL $68,500 tet--qac-x-s��tc�t-��a-x-�tx-x-x-►t-x-cE-'r�sc �-�-x#�cx->E�x�uac�-�t-x-x-x-x-t�3�rEx-x-rt-x-�a�x-x-�# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ — $ $ $ State $ — $ $ $ General Fund $ 34000 $ 15,500 $_10,000_ $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 68,500 $ $ $ $ $ TOT A L S $ X000 $ 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500 $_ 4,500 $ 68,500 LOCATION'. I ja 5 i � � �• �✓' s sa R / To 71 +.tYi.KM,4 ` wl!T n!�♦ FT;Y��• tSf,T``\A 4 [;�Jb 44 �, ! �. �.. .V f�� 0 � .�= Llif\•J Ips+a ,4 � \ �`. '-fT.p was ,4+ `♦ O \ �.tt-YOEO ,�, tr.arm sT1�"�r• a/a\ , \ ar. 'd• � 49 � J Si. ^�? � 8``� s iv. !^ � 1 2 tT. N �:: YTi�� 4T tiw�f�� !P.�♦ dIL96 ��' ' � RR '. i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WORD & DATA PROCESS. TERMINAL DEPARTMENT: FINANCE 6r SERVICES PRINTER` SECURITY-SOFTWARE DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase of four (4) additional word processing terminals and two (2) data processing ,terminals, ;is proposed to respond to greater volumes of work being produced and more frequent usage of existing terminals by more departments and staff.` The addition of more workstations will necessitate purchase of a printer in order to accommodate increased output. Funding for this project would be the General 'Fund. r�txx f iQ-x3Q-�#M#it-M-x-iEx-M-#�-DE#�-x�F3t-1t-x##�S##it-�-3E-x-M-H X-it#ii-aHE-M-1Hi-x-x-M-M x iHt#x-M-M-xiE Df-3Q-x-tt'.{-�E K ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 1,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 1 cashiers terminal @ $1,000 $ 2 word processing terminals @"$6,000 ea. 12,000 (1 support services, 1, police) 5,000 I printer 1,000 1 security software program (police) Phase III — FY 86-87 1 word';processing terminal 6,000 (Library/Supp'.Serv.) . 1 data processing terminal 3,000 k (Accounting/other) 3;000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 1 data processing terminal 6,000 • Phase V - FY 88-89 1 word processing terminal TOTAL $ 37,000 aA#x-Kif-x-Kit'�-�?Q-H-��-)E-14-}E-x-i{-Ri+HH(-K-3tit-M-3S-M)Eit3E-H-M-DF-xaFx-x-ff-x-x-x-'k)E�-lt'.'FM s SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 rY 87-88_. FY 88-85 TOTAL Y Federal --- $ $ $ $ $ $ s State $ $ $— $— $— $ $ $ General _ und $ 1 OOO $ 18,000 $ 9,000 $ 3,000 $ 6.000 $ 37,000 $ $ $ $ T O T A L S $ 1,000 $ 18.000 $ 9,000 $ 31000 $ 6,000 $ 37,000 K-x-IEx-x-xit#3{-x3414;F#-xit-x-H-x-Dditii�}(�4#x#3E�FX-x-M-k-�iF�-K�-x'M-x-DE #ic'#3£-1'l#D€if-3I.lEt1F+1#s'Y3r"�(-3Q-IY•�d-�iEiEifio-DE�:iFDf'3E-H�4-D3�S-lEN- ar. -.^.. �� ww \ ' j VW� i !I 3T.,fia "M Val x 11 RE441$ Q Sim'\, f • wa1 fop t4 g ➢ 0. f ,. � (� J • '� �,, o `Jpaa, fr. � ) ,.wNofo k [T w q • ,f�wttT' ^1 4 �✓ \4' P r, 51 To yy 44 0° FF aa. 8'' f �� • A�Ay ` 4 ~6 X 1 1 Y\ v ♦t L ' dl iGpT 4 qw. IfLM' AA Y 4 J o" p,'� Yy / �S` F ~•fal`art�Prt)tr " iw rpaA � w. 6Afa' Gl9'•ti tf� C• �a / —• i 7-7 aw. vfN[ ar k 04o P+/ C`$ t• \ Y 11 �ry BT A ,l �+r *!P`CN � UyA@a♦4*j,•q,"/�`A 8� OLM4 Ce 1 a' i c ' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN { PROTECT DETAIL € DEPARTMENT: GENERAL GOVERNMENT PROJECT: OFFICE EQUIPMENT DIVISION: ALL PROJECT LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER & PROJECT DESCRIPTION: to maintain and increase staff ' Purc Ease/replace 'off-ice equipment as needed productivity- tie Genelx Fund. at�txttxx� `� Funding for this Pro]yt fin„ t ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 5,000 typewriter replacements @ $1.000 ea./1 per FY 6,000 ers fir! $2, 000/FY 84-85 Library photo copis ' FY 85-86 Administration: FY 86-87 Police 1,500 adding machines/calculators @ $250/2 in FY 84-852 in FY 86-87 2 in FY 88-89 dictation system - 6 dictaphones @ $200, 2,500 2 transcribers '@ $650 ea transcribers, � FY 85-86 4 dictaphones, FY 87-88 2 dictaphones TOTAL $ 15,000 �4 i(3t 3t 4FMiHt3EiEtFiFsQ#�Ht H�4 KiE N�f!i SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 88-89 TOTAL FY 8� 4-85 FY_ 8___5=86 FY 8--6-8?_ FY 8-----88 Federal ___----- State o $ 15 000 3.500 $____1-400 $— $ 13 GO � $ .. General Fund $ 53 04 $ �_ $�� $ --------- $-- 15,000 3,100 $ 3 500 $ i 4fl�$ 3 500- $.. T O�_S^ $ 31500 �$ _ — .�•�E#.Yf�bDH�-�iE-)E-Sfi4#-fit-it-ES'k-1�3Yk=k�4-�'�#� _--- �E(}E�iQ-!f-it-fF3�-Dt-x-tt�i�?tiE3QiI-i'fiY�°.-M,1SDi3tat-DYAiHEIt-Y-Y{�-'A3t�t-M-1Ht)f�°TFDE-1t�E"�I--z S `o _ -: � :• TI1LN: �� , ` rNN �� ♦� f /WVrll SL. - KXNIPv - m w t4 Y 5. + ++14 II0:1r•'Gi 1k ^` O v P {•vy PI'0. Sw. dPC. f hL1W0J0 4'4 "I,rf1T d av1 s F /d y� ALJ o r GnpMaa yi ~ - -yl•.Lgws� !` � 49 lP _ : +s"J.L..w[ rcaxs IST al e® C�J ��l�xa. pl r•a, r L � �Y °a � - `•p'�°--.-� � � !M_ s o �y i 1.-• °(qT Pea a _ t r. �••` PW ' ! � fF Y X11 {[. fi s - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY' PROJECT: BOOKS, MATERIALS DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (141) PROJECT LOCATION: LIBRARY ht for the A five percent (5�) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,net expansion of new books and materials is soup of Cit Library. This addition of library materialwill, and recordsa h aswell purchase y s, cassettes, the clew' books, magazines, newspaper replacement of 'old and worn materials.' Funding for this project would be the General Fund. iFx�E##-x-�-x-34-M�H-kr#�(-N=,Et&3E-x-1iE-H-MjHi-!�?�jl-�(-k�'A-�Eit-3H(iF-Yi-x�-H-�-➢Hf H�t-�-1(�EN�(i4-x-3�c ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: • $150,000 $30,000 per year @ 5;years TOTAL $150,000 it.�E#iE��(.if-} 'k-)Hd�ExitiE#�-Yrtt3liE►F(#i(-#-M-k34#x3f#x-TF>F#'Hi-x-Hi4-DHt-Dt-xiHE�t-DE-x-it-x•1EM3HH('Y3i-�H(-%�1-x-x-DHEx�(-DFH-xiE#� 1 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN 88-89 _TOTAL `-- FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY_87-88 FY - Federal $ $------ $��— $---____ $---------- - —_ State $-- $ $ $ y General Fund $ 0 0 0000 $ 3 0 3 0 3 0 $$0 150.000 Cit3 30�OC 0 $�150,000 TOTALS $ 30:000 $_ 30.000 $ 3�— $ 30,000 $�30 ` ��t2�'-D:Ai.36-�i-M,f r .gait ,..., .S. � \`^ � `4i i•oov.0 sT, I l' •'t 6atr TeaGC[ s a r E ,�� I l�i / LOCATION: a / f•. y ra �P i. �_ C St N r� r p tn.aaof sr. a oa tr'. rr ` „t s° iF— vh+oi._.sr. c�lwr s�" + 'r f r` rf♦ & ;"'r -0 � y1 ttf. Hr G$u. ' •c'q �S,j,�(�Cr rr r / S0.WNia =eal4aft P� � RO F t { M'ISi- Mi Sw A 4 w 1 Rg4 ��/! ' < $� tW. „e ��q,P � 9f"q+�•\�f♦ EM. Ob0.Wa tai. f, a I ----1 C.-7 ..� _ ,ter ', �` �- �, s Am - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER DEPARTMENT . DIVISION: PROJECT LOCATION: Tektronix building adjoining City Hall, at Ash Ave. & Burnham St. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase of building is proposed , to consolidate- government activities and agencies, relieve cramped office spaces in separated while saving tax dollars lost to buildings, and better serve the public continually rising rental charges. The; allocation> of division space would be as follows: Library - , 15,000 sq- The Police - 10,924 sq. ft (35%) Administration- 7,250 sq. ft. (20%) . Funding for purchase of new Civic Center would be `from,General Fund.;, Mxx#x)ExDFx�# iEX�fx►Exp` # #####xatxxxxxiExxxxxx-x-x�Fyxxx'(i(xxxxx�exxHx�(itxxxxxx'3(#jtxxx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Purchase of building for new Civic Center $2,200,000 ($255,000 allocated per yr.) TOTAL $2,200,000 ° it-DE##3Ex-x-x-x'i(-x-x�E-x-i(-xit-#'x'�t�E##x-x-�(-#-xiFx-)f#x-34#'x-x-3(1Fx-x#x-K-x3(iEBt'DE-x-xjt-xi(-x-)H()ExiE'x-x x-x x x-x-M-x-x-x-3(-?4-Yv-x#x-lE# r SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85--86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ - $ $ $---- City ---City $ $ $ $— - $ $ General Fund $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255,000 : $$ 255,000= $1,275,000 T 0 T A CS $ -255,000.. $ 255,000 $ 255,000 $ 255000 $ 255,000 $1 275,000 ` LOCATION. `�- v� �I LEw15L '� if, I Ltl. II WViLL ST. 1!!�f 4ti St T211 rE im 't- I wa\V1�.'; LM.nen R�Y�.: I� 1I tlFJ00mT � + Si-±—i6.Y�f - / LTY �`c sW ) L _AVa. LIM.I.INC Et. ; •P`p11�� Sw� -h � ,yy t � , s 4 f. �[FVOSO W4T g.9 SW.•--.£A1tOL Si. kf 4q K 1 yk ��(�(' / _ TO (� � T,L. � li y4. e y- b�/ �\ BVQy \\\VVV Y i ET, L s.w ICNMER � � / sw Ts, 1P �/ti•_ � —�'a$�1 s�4...1 -. .. i ou.<+: sr. tlA P T S� 4� dE•� Ts o CMR //� �s af4 f qys. X04 .i L V � ~FIP- ET L ST. r CAPITAL IMPROVOCNT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: VEHICLE REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: POLICE DIVISION: PATROL (112) PROJECT LOCATION: POLICE DEPT./CIVIC CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: { Purchase/replace police-fleet vehicles. Funding forthis project would be from the General Fund. #!Ex-!i#x-x-x3E-xaFx-x'x lE x-)E�t-x3Fx-x-fEit-x-x-1HEx-x-x -x-3E-xiE-x-x-'d-x-x-)c#x-x-)t-x-x-x-x-x-3Fx�x iH(-x-x-x-xiE�(-x-x t. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase<I - FY 64=85 7 automobiles (new), less resale & int. earned $66,000 Phase II FY 85-86 1 motorcycle, 3 automobiles (new), 31,990 less resale & int. earned Phase III — FY 86-87 5 automobiles (new), 1 motorcycle, ` x less resale & int. earned 57,838 Phase IV -'FY 87-88 3 automobiles (retrofitted @ $5,000) less resale 14 00 TOTAL $170,328 4 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN k FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State , $ $ $ City $ $ $ — € General Fund $ 66,000 $ 31,990 $ 57,838 $ 14,500 $ $ 170,328 T 0 T A L 5 $ 66,000 $ 31,990 $ 57,838 $ 14,500 $ $ 170,328 � ?4-xi(#K-M-x-x-n-x-x-vK1E-M-bF'rEDt-x-x#3F�x�fi(iEi+��'�H�i4-T.`'x-x'k$F St-D€34i{#x-x-i£'3F3(-M-M'.4iC-x-x-###Hi('kFR#x-i4 i LOCATION: c - co �II sW.^ ■TN4 atI � ��'—�� / Sa Y T • R. �h � /\ a• �NN4• �Lr m � ,`§it V Cy Lay. NT1ob 07t) St B;�a fT. To ! vZ 44 Lr�: � PF �4igy ��is4a �8 l csaNSN zT s.�. r a'`r v �s r. •' ti rNs amt i/ b f /t st � ! I fflgq=,11'111 IRS! j: 1 r 1 P a 04".4 6W. Otia)7a � ti Lb 11 a guy; WE f- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL' PROJECT: PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS (215) a DIVISION: OPERATIONS-SUPPORT SERVICES K PROJECT LOCATION: PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace public works'equipment. if-):-H�"iii-Pt#x#xii Q-x#xii-?E-x-x3fii#Td3tlk-}Si(it?t niEif?{-'x-x?t)(�t-H#iE-x 8(-x#3tiHt-f(iF#iE-xai-x�d�-M x xii-x-x-xi(-§t x-Dt-x-xit?t#x#x�(3t-�E q ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 ! Sewer Flusher Truck @ $80,000 $ 80.000 1 Dump Truck @ $32,000 32,000 2 3/4_T pick'-up trucks @ $10,000 20,000 3 Small pick-up trucks @$6,000 18,000 30,000 Phase II -'FY 85-86 1 TV Sewer Trailer @ $30.000 11,000 1= asphalt roller @ $11,000 1 van_@ $12,000 12,000 7,000 assorted smaller equipment 29,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 l backhoe @ $29,000 14,500 ` 1 ST truck @ $14,500 I Tractor @`$9,500 9,500 r; assorted smaller equipment 7,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 1dump truck 32,000 _1- tractor w. articulated arm @ $28,000 28,000 s 1 12,000 van 1 small pick-up truck 6,000 assorted'smaller equipment 7,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 1 street sweeper truck @ $90,000 90,000 1 3/4 T pick-up truck 20,000 TOTAL $455,000 iEit-�t-M#EEx-Dt#�HE-x#3t#K-DQiE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN t FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $_ $_ $ State Gas Tax $ 6 000 $ 11.000 $ _ $ 42,000 $--4--5,000 $ 104,000 �. s $ $ $ $ City $ $ ,000 General Fund $ 16,000 $ $ 31, 90 000 $ 43,000 $ $ Sewer Fund $ 96,000 $ 49,000 $_14,500 $ $ 10,000 $ 169,500 ~ SDF $ 32,000 $ $ 14,500 $ $ 45.000 $ 91,500 T 0 T A L S $ 150,000 $ 60,000 $_ 60,000 $ 85.000 $ 100,000 $ 455,000 4 -i;x-�-►��x��i#x-x�#x ............ E �t-x-x-x�tix��x-x-x-at o LOCATION: v 4,.J L.� ► u ClY See b - rl.r ST.~ Jy f„^, P, a, F.4S rfn ;cA4030 Ira, 1 Sa Sa. fQaa a'f � (.' v y 99 y ��i J St 1. 4• ST. R � 4Y(•CS as � d / ~� `aC ��i4 [I �,� Sm YeAN6 ST. � h nt �, 9NY .. Ss. GAWA t / Of �'�."�\ • \ I ^"�' c CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COMPUTER EQUIP.—ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: ENGINEERING (216) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An incremental, component purchasing program is proposed to update and enhance the existing computer ' system to handle a < wider range of engineering/desiSn—oriented-work assignments. Greater efficiency in dealing with often time-consuming, ''civil, engineering projects is an expected 'result from usage of the new equipment. More in-house` engineering projects with fewer staff increases_would result in greater productivity gains. Funding for this project would bethe General Fund. x-x-x-x-�t� t-3�-�-x�€-x-x-%�-x-x-x-��#x•�-x-��-xx-�#3t�-�x-a�-x-x-x-tt#xit�- �-x-x-x-x-x�tic-x-►t�-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-tt-x x-x-x-x-x-x-:E-tt-pi-x x-�- ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I"- FY 84-85 ,WANG Graphics Scope $3,600 related software 2,500 $ 6,100 Hewlett Packard Plotter (36"x48") $24,400 related software 3,500 27;900 Phase II FY 85-86 CALCOMP Ditigitizing Board $6,000 related software 2500 8,500 additional software (EMDS)(MDS) 7,000 Phase III FY 86-87 '`additional software 4,500 Phase IV - FY 87-88 additional software and work 'stations 10,000 Phase V - FY '88-89 additional software 4,500 TOTAL $68,500 f t H-#�€•K-}f#E-x-ii�(•i(-TS-K-Tf-?(-x-D(-M-X-iE#H-ii-iF#x-)FiQ-M-H'j(-IEiFM-H-K-M'A-DEYa i(-:t-�E-M-BETE K-k-3(-M-X-K-�-x•�E•K-##-MiFM�-icii-ic SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY-86-87- FY 87-88 ' FY 88-89 TOTAL x Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ City $ $ $ $_ General Fund $ 34,000 $ 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500_ $ 68,500 $ $ _ $ $ _ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 34,000 $ 15,500 $ 10,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 68,500 s t �at��-x-�-ttc-�c�c-ac-�-x-�;:.M�-x-��a�t-�-��FxJx-x-x-x�-u-;c•�-x-x-x•x-x-x-x�t-x�-s�-x-x-�-��-x-x�-x-x-rc-x �-ac-�c-x-�• i LOCATION/(:Kii - S; X i� `` LM. rani. ♦_ >I /pyVALL ST. i C L t"•N � I� i F =1 (��\ •`AniaC �1I �_•___.__sr. n.. ♦ �' ♦� V Lis R /r q�q .q' S.y gyp• TA -..✓ 3-.\.• ai4 CT rTOr f+ / ~r ♦ �F� f °pyo � 5 j ♦ I (j r v[L k sP °�" r `\ +' a� F s TO pz}T �4 '> O _. ®.. fle'0� L-5'_'� f. wtl [r 1... '/,......u9A.P r1~/'/S• '1' 11!•. SCIRA 1 1 i GeQAA9♦ i� M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WORD 6 DATA PROCESS. TERMINAL DEPARTMENT: FINANCE 6 SERVICES PRINTER, SECURITY SOFTWARE' DIVISION: ACCOUNTING (122) PROJECT LOCATION: CITY HALL SUPPORT SERVICES (123) PROJECT DESCRIPTION`.: Purchase of four (4) additional word processing terminals and two (2) data processing terminals, is 'proposed to respond to greater volumes of work being produced and more frequent usage of existing terminals by more departments and staff. The addition of more workstations will necessitate purchase of a printer in order to accommodate increased output. Funding for this project would-be the General Fund. 3(-DE Hi(i:-x-i(-M-Mi4-)i-K#K#R#iSiQ-H-M-3Q-D(3t#1f#•ii-DE-)E-MiE-H-H##iFiF�iHHLM X3(-k-�(-M M-H-3(-D<-Mit-tEH�d-SfH-Hi4-k-D(=mcic-n=��c-3{iEM-X#1E�-DE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: ` Phase I — FY 84-85 1 cashiers terminal @ $1,000 $ 1,000` 2 word processing terminals @ $6,000 ea. 12,000 (1 support services, 1 police) ' I printer' 5,000 1 security software program (police) 1,000 Phase III — FY 86-87 l word processing terminal ` (Library/Supp.Serv.) 6,000 1 data processing terminal (Accounting/other) 3,000 Phase IV — FY 87-88 1 data processing terminal 3,000 Phase V — FY 88-89 1 word processing terminal 6,000 TOTAL $ 37,000 �-x-}fat-at-3c-M�-FrE- x-3F Tfx-x-K-x-K-34-?Fi4#H-8t-34-x-k-%TS-3f-xai-}i-xiEDEx-M-H-x-x-9H4-6E-Df#it�t-3t-H-x-x-x-)E-x-x - SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-65 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $. $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 1,000 $ 18,000 $ 9,000 $ 3,000 $_ 6,000 $ 37,000 T'0 T A 1_ S $___.I00 $ 18,000 $ 9,000 $ 3,000 $ 6,000 $ 37,000 # ?fif' K K Dt��r3taE Kit DHf M 1t;(H Dt H➢EiHEiHEa#itat)E 3Ht?tMiEii#Hat#3k}?i#i atitii�4 31?(iSiFDF LOCATION: e iaiM Tur°[ y r `1d� ii' ovv.cL ST A 'L A TXER UU P Q.- �t bc_ns 1 F ro y Iltt O" ��9 b � $• is S� f P o U a ® p 4 r a� 'b /tom• P Y 4mr gy0 CtnYfH `a f.vl. i tf S. rtn IT, artnrcns s �� i sy'gj�i Fla- Ilk- sT y ^ s s° .9 i * �a +�� e. sii 6 '. a•��b�*� 'S' g :acs_. t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: OFFICE EQUIPMENT. DEPARTMENT: GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION: ALL PROJECT LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER : PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase/replace office equipment as needed to maintain and increase staff productivity. Funding for this project would be the General Fund . Ycn�c-rfnn-°l�..l-n-+c-r.�(iHi#M##DE-3f-Dt##�)E-X-iQ##-H-n nii-n-n-n-n-r<-n-+a-.z-n�#�f#�E i(•�(#H#H�(-M-K#i(#K-#M-H-x#-R3(�(-x#i(-�S-x-Mi(M## ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: typewriter replacements @ $1,000 ea./1 per FY $ 5,000' photo copiers @ $2,000/FY 84-85 Library 6,000 FY'85-86;Administration FY' 86-87 'Police adding machines/calculators @ $250/2 in FY 84-85 1,500 2 in FY '86-87 2 in FY 88-89 dictation system - 6 dictaphones @ $200, 2 transcribers @ $650 ea 2,500` FY 85-86 4 dictaphones, 2 transcribers, FY 87-88 2 dictaphones TOTAL $ 15,000' �F(-M#DF Df�(-H#DE#•jE3i3Fit-3f-M•M-H-N#Yc -Di-R if-H-�-)t-DE-�-Df-?s-%iE-M�-H x-Mitzi-�f-T{iE 3E-1f-D(-Mi(•Nvf-Dt-M-xi(-K-��Q-3Ht#M-?(-k-Y-Yt 3s�E-�#�M-H-�E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ General Fund $ 3,500 $ 3,100 $ 3,500 $ 1,400 $ 3,500 $ 15,00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 3,500 $ 3,100 $_ 3,500 $ 1,400 $ 3,500 $ 15,000 # -iii#x3EiE3Hf-H-SQiE#-�-1i #�E�-#H-DE#•X-xit�i-:Ei(#x•�-Y-u-if-K-�-M-1i-��{-?FM-x-x-#s�-H'k�t-DFM-lt-Xi4iE•x#x#M-H1(-x#T£�E#-�t-'h# a4N: t[YNf " Q. IN 4ST[;T.�\,•, fq•F' Sy F tf.'` 6 1 ST..T 'a p ka fM i - WO' 9b..em tT. C.-N! _ � L/a� O ,t•f r � �} •.� S •tC. STAN pyO Wq. rt ' kr :4 • \ ppa TO ST 0-1 ST - • CP1lN[r bT M1^• T N•rr �f` ri�q O�.rO•. 1V ! ," '` / r1� f.•P N. NT ��J O S �K(eL-["6Y!!Tt `� 1.1a1S « • _..../4� .; � / LJ WM1n`[ tT �� P O ii33�tldd _Q t, [•�a `6� coca , °*d ° t� _-~ f t\/ r!a f T J ,• • 8a � .^� � II!i lr. yf� Y f SN' 4�'� OP i� / n.Cs Q44394 '1 M C 4•% 1 Vvr CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL 1 DEPARTMENT: LIBRARY PROJECT: BOOKS, MATERIALS DIVISION: LIBRARY SERVICES (141) PROJECT LOCATION: LIBRARY ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: is gy; net expansion of new materialsdwillQincludestheupurchaseht for tOf A five percent (5%) city_Library. This addition of Library and records as well as the new books, magazines, newspapers, ', cassettes, r-eplacement 'of old and worn materials. k Funding for his project would be the General Fund. �tx> x�txx�tx # xxxxxxx s #�fdS-##3t3HF3EiHCit-H-R-3`�E#-H-'� e. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $150,000 $30,000 per year @ 5 years ; ti " fy S TOTAL $150,000 t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 88-89 TOTAL � FY 84-85_ FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 8` 7=88 $-- $ $- — $ Federal $-- -- $____--- State 0 $ 1 d 30,000_ $ $ Cit�r ; -----.-- $y�_ $��_V 000 $ ao,000 30,000 $ General Fund $ 3__��_— ----_ �� T 0 T A L S 50,009 $ 30.000 $ 3_ 0_000 ` 3---d'000_ $ 3_�L --$ 30 J 000 1 -. S. Nk t. �. � [.._-,� � - � y(-comas./e•wnlee tip<qq � �y`e, __ -'" \ � « 4 :L Y �JC9r� Sw .1' �SIrYQSO i Sw I.YTw1 S �7'� GT�t"�� JT V�!yJ 4,� I F N w'nT L• ., STN Sffh f�TTA• r � a 9, s1r.« � SN.LM!e ST. f SAT_ Cs 4t' ti J!. h� lGQh 6 - TPT ST. it .•n. eq /•�J� S I y►.I, elT{Rtn sT ~ p�NZ ti 'YyG Oi h ,, SF '•Y_edMRs IT r l � ��.• �C w � a'� !� �T lN. ! (//L44'//' (. ��P 9f�!/. g S.a.�y�',�,�----2l, off. .. _ �i r f H s r a: z H F-3 a s IV. PUBLIC bIRKS - SANITARY SEWERS , Primary functions of the 'Operations Wastewater Division of public Works have been the inspection and maintenance of sewer lines, and the repair and replacement of inadequate or defective sewer -lines Two projects :of this nature are identified in the C.I.P._ for completion over the next five years. City involvement in the construction of new sewer lines has been limited to participation with interested property owners desiring connection to the City sewer networks through the formation of Local Improvement Districts (L.I,D.). An estimate of expected annual costs associated with non-specific, city-wide L.I.D. projects is included_ for each year of the C.I.P. at a steadily increasing rate. Specific projects listed as L.I.D. or developer-funded are largely derived a from staff .evaluation of where new development is likely to occur, based on past and present trends, and indications of developer interest. Certain areas of the City, however, which remain unsewered due to the period and pattern of their 'development, pose special ; problems that require City initiative. Potential health hazards exist in some of these areas due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water. Due to the pattern 'of development and distance from feeder trunk> lines, the formation of L.I".D.s has proven inadequate as a means for promoting connection to the sewer system. Such areas identified in the C.I.P. include Walnut Island, Little Bull Mountain, Alderbrook and McDonald. It is proposed that a Revenue Bond measure of $460,000 be adopted as a means to provide feeder trunk lines to these areas and promote 'connection of local residents to the City sewer network;' thereby alleviating the potential for community health hazards occurring. It is proposed .that the Sewer Fund continue to be utilized as a source for funding continuing maintenance, repair and replacement of sewer lines,,as well as City participation in extra capacity L.I.D. projects. The Sewer Fund should be allowed to accumulate a reserve amount in the area of x;250,000 as a means to allow response to any unforeseen health emergencies. i CAPITAL IMPROV "T PROGRAM PLAN DIVISION DETAIL r DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS - WASTEWATER (212) f YEAR,1 - $108,000 Phase I - Durham Island Sanitary Sewers` 90,000 Phase I - McDonald Area Trunk Sewers 65,000 Downtown Sanitary Sewers 55;000 Phase I - Tigard Triangle -' No. 72nd Avenue 150,000 V LIDS City-wide ' YEAR 2 - $ 90,000 lk Phase 'II - McDonald Area Trunk Sewers 173,000 South side 99W Replacement Sewers 140,000 Phase I - Walnut Island Trunk Sevier Phase I -'Walnut Island Ancillary Trunk Sewers/Line D 90,000 Phase T Little BullMtn Sewers No. 100th Ave/Inez St 135,000 'Phase I - Alderbrook'Area Trunk Sewers 90,000 LIDS City-wide 175,000 YEAR 3 - $ 58,500 Phase II -'Durham Island Sanitary Sewers 140,000 Phase 'II Walnut Island Trunk Sewer Phase II - Walnut Island Ancillary Trunk Sewers/Line A 90,000 Phase II - Little Bull Mtn Sewers Murdock Street 80,000 Phase II - Alderbrook `Area Trunk Sewers 90,000 LIDS City-wide` 200,000 YEAR 458,500 III - Durham Island Sanitary Sewers 58,500 Phase III - Walnut Island Ancillary Trunk Sewers/Line C 135,000 Phase III - Little Bull Mtn Sewers - S 100th/Sattler/98th 147,500 s Tigard Triangle/Hwy 217 Replacement Sewers 67,500 LIDs - City-wide 225,000 YEAR 5 - 50,000 Phase II - Tigard Triangle -- S 72nd Avenue $ Phase IV - Walnut Island Ancillary Trunk Sewers/Line B 200,000 Phase IV - Little Bull Mtn Sewers - Sattler/96th/Hoodview 147,500 Tigard Street (II) Area Sewers 90,000 LIDS - City-wide 250,000 M ifs rHt H' �6 H�tit##3t �(iiiQ�,�f Y M X3Hc xis x P4)4 x�1# x DE FFk M 3E#H ------ct-X#X-x-wx SCHEDULE AND FUNDING SUMMARY y y FY 84-85 FY 85-86 . FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-84 TOTAL E Federal State City $_ _ $ s Sewer Fund $__65_,000 $ 173,000 $ $ 67,500 $ _ $ 305,500 ReL,enue Bond* $ 90,000 $ 130,000 $ 40,000 $ i35 000 $ 65.000 $,460,000 OQuelo�er $ $ 135.00O+Y $ 178_12 ,500 $ 106,000 $__L7 2,500 $_ 692,000 LION 455,00._ $_440,000 $ 325,000 $ 400,000 $1,933,000 T 0 T A L S $ 468,000 $ 893.000 $ 65x,500 $ 633,50Y $ 737,500 $3t390,50U' Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund No City Costs PREDOMINATELY UNSE`vJERED AREAS j Outside Inside City City T R Yl CREST IDPWE �° 9r n W 1'•1\�_ •^' ^I ' r«.Ia.. SO'A.. YF�DO'W C 3w £ '` / DUVALL ST CLI , i 23SW 1TANGE L `. .� :A 4 EL PSW•^•KATHE H 51 STl T ST. u RYCESDA T> S Sy 4 1ST EL ra � cT �'c�c+- 1 O V,FRY01p ~ � S$ °.... s. A< 2. po <(Y ^ S fe'[•a V Z 1%' ykl N 4 . � 3' P. S ? yS• F ti = b sar f 4h, g NAYp i r'SW. yt. ST p =WDA-TAINS S w IJV /� ��C J•r / r T :.5w GRAHT `Qy0�Vti. � � :� � � « •' Si y JI Derr AY rf.fC v.. Cwt}. ~ C les 9 P� r• E ST. # l De l I =y �SWfP P,�? Rolling o sW. •� C. IaRCvPivf I fs7: �8 Acre Hills�� SANOI DT � w °A��! 1 + / P _ ! t W N _ } . F�KIHAVE � =W.'�! W R . NA1bEW 5T : McDonal Area )' _ 41 VIEwYOL a 4. r �/�{ e 5 '§^ N3 U4' OIE LU`T ESV Acres ..r ' - SV/[,Y . - €.. 1 h OMROE PANK PL. iarde Area s' _`_ W - E e. GpEEK CT S 4 �erVpK� ° S FANNO B'-20.•AM3 0T. .. RT I S NRDES LP 009009 nu Z (w :•T,4 TE AC -. SW INEL s S.W. WS R � � 7-Un PCC C PEYBNOOK ; °^ � 5T. fc < < ; PIHEBRD� E OR n. F T. REILIN9 ' dull I E s ET { dAlderbrook` W' Mtn s. TT,A <f�rea� W 245 Acres 3 Durham Island 1130 A f DRYS e AreafJ 61 222 Acres '� I! C:: SM. DURNAY R0. 0 RRAY R0. / � � SW COOK/' SAffr T. •g (AMLGS JlAIE5 :FES," \oQ' PL. f�/�`,�R YILLE VA m I I ! nll WOOD R S. FINd.AY Ron GR4vEK pi �I -ET.� &�`k '� ~coo.��ee •, G e� ..�"LeRooK �L�----'--- � I\ �� A�.oeruw � . >'+!1•�.iti.i� 1O�a .i - . _ � i f`, f' l' �_: _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRM PL( PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT`. DURHAM ISLAND SANITARY SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast section of City (222 acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as suitable for moderate to high density residential development (R-7, R-5, ,A-12), with 'potential : for rapid growth. - Placement of initial trunk sewer lines in this area will "facilitate its economic development. Probable funding sources would be through LID's and as conditions of development. it-M-DFyE#1�-YES-x#x-x-x-x-x-x-Di-DFx�(-x-x-x-xxi(-x-lEiEdE�HEx-x-x•#iE-x-x-xiHf-M-x-xx#x-xx-x-x x-3t-x-x��t-x-x-x-x-M-x-x-x#x-h[•x-fix x-x�(-x-H-H-3E ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 5,000'of 8" lines @ $45 ,per lineal foot: $ 225,000 TOTAL: $ -225,000 •lam-TtiE}t-x-x�(-,Y-x•H x-x-x�Q-x#x-YrM-x##x-x-X-x-x-x-K-x-x-xaE x x#x-2E xx�(-}E'x-?E•k-M-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-K-x#3f-x-:EiE x-x-K-)fat-x-x-)E-4:-x-x-x�•x-x-?fx# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN ( FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City _ $ $ $ $ $ $ LID $ 108,000 $ $ $ $ $ 108,000 Developer $ $ $ 58,500 $ 58,500 $ $ 117,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L. S $ 108,000 $ $ 58,500 $ 58,500 $ $ 225,000 x•#-x-x-�(-x-x-x-x�(-x#x?!-3#-�friS#t-�Y-x'xiHfiE�(''�#�4-x-x-Dt4£�S#x'R�F-x#D(-xif-JS-x-xiEx-DfiHE#�E)i�if3t-DQ•x-Di#x-x_-➢(-x##x-x#i(-x-x•3t-if-DS-xi(-1F _ LOCATION: Ew TERRACE L� « w GE t' =o' 7 1 rnoES�ie 4°/ �S.w. INEZ 11 wnn.o" Pc _r En. �.[^{ Wyl p 9.V _ _ PEtl®NOOK n P U••.y N r . ST IT— T A j O PINEll E „ 00. ToST < = CT I ORCT EYONTE j! S.w. NOQOVIEW Sw. 't SATTIER tr ry yy T. - ;� ROSS ST. ST �[ � it r ' •rlam - 11Wt11AhtRl��"t� •�� . �_s._ _.:. ^ �+ 'I NAIVE ST SW 91 E I W ORIYE IT, CRBUAM JPI.I' j �� S �°e �+��nyrT U--e.sM. a A � <,`t 3 9 [..�—•d .i �� />'j i g s 1¢ OUP.NAM RD. l./ Y. r IJ r r 1 I 1 1 /LL Y n 1 '. PS W C00! 2RRfNA� ; [• ,r1 / '•�'r IP( I �.CT / JUEIA � 1. ii CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: McDONALD AREA TRUNK SEWER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater (212) PROJECT LOCATION: Central Section of 'City (151 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as a section of City in need of a major trunk line to facilitate future development, and complete, part of trunk line network in City'. While the City Sewer Fund and LID's remain possible funding sources for this region, inclusion of this project on an approved construction revenue bond would provide quick completion and ready access ,to surrounding area for connection to City sewer network. _ #H-)t-)Fx-x-x-DFH-H#DFx-M-x-H-Di-k-)Fx-#iE x-YrH-H x-Hit-H-k-M-x#-H-H-H-Hii-H-x-x#x-H�f-�H3E#3EH-SEj(-DE#-x-H#-x-x-fE'H-H-H H-H#H-)E#�(-MiE-H-H-DE-x-H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4,000' of 8" +' 12" line @ $45 per lineal foot $180,000' TOTAL: $180,000 ' #�EP(-M-Hi4-H-H#k-H-H-H-Tt-D(-H-H-)EH-H-H#H#Hif-x-HH-x-K H#3(-H-H-H##x-}E:#�iE-H3E-H-H-HHH-x-H-x#-H-D(#H-HH#H-H-H-H-DEit-H�Hf-HiEi(-Df-x-Hi(-;E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89TOTAL 4 Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $_ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Revenue Bond* $`.90,000 $_ 9o,o00 $ $ $ $ 180,000 T 0 T A L S $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ $ $ $ 1801000 Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund. �9Ei4if'H-H"?EH-)E#'H'H3(-Xi{-MdQ-H-Df9(i(-x�;l�H-1F3flS-H-)l-H-}:-)(-iE)H(-H#Y(-H-94-x-YE3(-x-H#x#x# H-��t-YE#x�E'D4-X-x-�HEiE LOCATION: 9x 'E NN S.W. r.. L—TA �MATKINS w yY'.� / ,p� ZW KONNER d �i SK p�•. � sisr `/C r / LZ T. ZW. LId 5 c.Y O' SW. PAflA ST. F7 w S4 JO � /- N�� 'y a Ni; LN. �v / Sa�p!/L �.Nil�' � • P +fJ`f ST. \/\J]'\\ SYI.�' OSl4RA I \ EWEw000 ST, CHER SW.F.pf, u CT FAIRNAVEN LL GEN 4� • NM1LV!dW vS.W_ NM1L IEW CT. PAR }4. K Pr I —� ' V 3 c ` 3 AKYlE 59 r 5. n � �'� W ALD ST f J E Y ELROSE G ON T CREEK CT C— f CT - FYI CT � �= 3. i n r S'W FANNO C\K G O Iry jp • w f�NG NTAMivI W -- LAME ; R(�.E on, GO m KROES LP i ^. WL O.TT A, o a� a H gds' Ski J. C vIEW TE.ACE �. JP �9.W INEZINESy-' 97 1 E swj R ^ W Ly• " I : 1 INEL „ .. 6 P c+ 6!JgTA9��.. F R4. rf,Tar QR T LN. G S.W. � PEMtMOOK /ISii /;O N: LL T 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMEUT PROGRAM PLA&8 PROJECT DETAIL i PROJECT: DOWNTOWN SANITARY SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ; DIVISION: Operations—Wastewater(212) - PROJECT LOCATION: Central Section of City (45 Acres) i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as providing insufficient sewerage capacity to accommodate further development. Thesewer system in area will be improved to accommodate 4 existing and future needs of downtown area. , The 'City 'Sewer ;Fund is the most likely fundingsource for replacement and . expansion of sewer lines in this area. x•�•�t�-x-x�t-3t-x x-x-�-x x-�-x-x-�E-x-x�x-x-�-x x-X:��-�-x-�-x-rt-x-x at-x-x-x-�-�-x-x-�e-x-x-x-�-xat-x-�t-�•�t-x-�-x-x�-x�t-�-x x-x-x-x-x-x-�t�•� ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 1,400' of 10" line @ $45 per lineal foot $ 65,000 k r - 4 TOTAL: $ 65,000 -X-x-x-M-x-"-X*X-DHE-*K-x-M#-➢i--x-x-X**-X-x H k x#H x 36 x x x f 3EiE x AHt fit x x tt YE x xit x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN s FY 84-85-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL g, Federal $ State $ Gita $ $ $ Sewer Fund $ 65,000 $ $ $ $ $ 65,000 T 0 T A L S $ 65,000 f 3t-iEi(-DtiR-i{Mat-K X-X K H-Dc H DHt D(M#)E k?FiEM#iE X Pt P(KiF>FM it X M M M Dt#iEti(){ H K X M H M H34?E#)E!£9E�(DHi�f AE}�?EY(H X K M rFAt M LOCATION: aT� S w a Sw TANGFL E W\11 V t f- Ys+\.++ssee RATnE:rN ST-"` 4 Q• S..T[ -Y ST. q 3 iii hY�DE25M� ypT(.�'P�w�A GIRO ' �f=! Fes.. • RIrP ST Sad N <T ST\ JP V CQ�4- Sa 4 eL5 - a~/ � '=a � f, // �o +< •� � � Yy�Jf� I fcOa N' N090 WAY �a s. C6 ro C sARorEN sT sem. Eul fir•` �s w. eW * \�' x Pnu. RTA ST <–""'— -gWiAM9 •,)t % f 9T 6- - s.a TowNER � s# �s•;- ;/ s��D{/C� ! � �.� �, MFS :ST.. a PGP4 c� DERRY DT.t x d d •S / �? r 1 �I+rTI• F, Z Y P c Q+ 4�/ g PZ. <+ �. .•\r ,a .FIR- St. G 2 -F� f �1i LM l Zdf.R t9' /-J� V C •FTl 9T. `\� -U 3 .♦ . A' �(�J n Sa. f 1A•�4 = ST. �'< r ¢Z IWhOR^:d; Sf/. OLARA Sw n 1F�RYra � /.• / .—�--J/ \ �/��/ / : '� - i\ CYERRY ami�i'Tl' CAPI'T'AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT --- PROIECT DETAIL BLIC WORKS i PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE SANITARY SEWER DEPARTMENTDIVISION! Operations—Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast section of City (300 Acres) ` PROJECT DESCRIPTION: rowth, and capable of Area is identified as currently undergoing rapid 9 ar future. placement of attracting significant thiso °is easiic lyv accpessed mnt in area ofcommercial, professional feeder trunk lines in and residential (R-10) land uses;will facilitate its economic development. Most likely funding sources would be through formation of LIDs H-3E?#3E#-H �L=rci.=ern�-%M�F'kit M-H-)Q�FH'B4iE'➢('�4-N-3E-11-M#?F�f-}E-TFN-3E�Q�E-)F�H4-?Hf�f###kiEif#H-M-x��#1E'�('A'H'H x 3EDE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 84/85 N. 72nd Avenue — 1200' of 811 lines @ $45 per lineal foot $50,000 er lineal foot $55,000 FY 88/89 S. 72nd Avenue - 1110 ,of 8 lines @ $45 P TOTAL: $105,000 .� M�fiHHFit-)EHE-�H-�-R-�-H-) 1EiE3FDEH;E3f3f-��E-3(-M-�-ik#-k-K�"H-}Fx-X-rii('.S-D4-3EDFX-it-3E3f3Q"DE#iF)(- �, SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ Cita 501000 $ 105,000 LID $ 55,000 $ $ $ T 0 T A t S $. 55,000 $ $Y.-..— $ $ 501000 $ 1052000 105,000 x-xi'r LOCATION: U SW NORT UAKaS.i__.._Si. 5T. .T..�...TT' 211 N ♦Jy�y! /' r - - Y.� Y y m S.W. PFASFLE 5T. -_ / AY 3. HAI E. E ATLANTA sods y� _cs sW. to S.W. TI"AD ST 5C LE IS r...T. 'V! .�j .^ OUVALL ST. 7 LN9W // CLIMTp } 51 i ^_; �r s ri A •EL c MI 1 . PL.PL. MEADdwP ' tttJJJ • 6 3ARTMQU KAReR'.0 CT D • CTOESCAL�•" ! J r p'�' dr4 ,� AtF St +�,�C`�, tt rr a C A 5 + pi Q A pUT - 5W, k TTS . 1 (( CO SKJ An.CLNi z / �» sr \�.✓ \ : /� +� , s: � (r +F � S.W. i�—jr•7(-t r• L&W_.—. oi . �p aa!�r arg • try" II ��L ry sw i\ id ST 1-- n CAPITAL IHpR0V1gW&wT PROGRM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROSECT: SANITARY SEWERS LIDS _ DIVISION: Operations--Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: to Unsevered areas in theproximity not to existing trunka 'l.ines, seprov de wogs table aai,thin reasonable pro y ac of for formation of are primarily ily resident al achieves a means to a characteron and soften 2 such areas identified suspected of possible .healthhazards due to .lack of sanitary sewers, septic x tank seepage, and high ground water tables. �x-x��#� -x�t-zFx-x-aEiFx x-x�c-x•�-x-x��t-x-x-x-x-xat-x-x�-x��xx-x-x�i�-�t-x-�tac#xat-x-x�-x-x-x�x-x#x�t-x-x-x X-X* ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $150,000 FY 84,85 estimated LID projects City-wide $175,000 FY 65/86 estimated LID projects City-wide $200,000 FY 86/87 estimated LID projects City-wide $225,000 FY 87/88 estimated LID projects City-wide $250,000 FY 88!89 estimated LID "prof eels City-wide ` TOTAL: $1,000,000 r i�3tit x�(Dtt M x#fit x x#x xit 3i x�E#x 4#x x3fiHt tHf x xt x3Exi(#�t x x x=,tit lE x�E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN _ TOTAL _ FY8 4-85 FY 85-86 FY '86-87— FY 87-85 FY 88-89 Federal $__-- $ — $�_ $ $ ___--- $ State $_- $- -' $ — LID $ 15 000 O $ 17 000 $ 20 0 $ 22_5 000- 250,000 $1,000,0 E T O T A L S $ 15� 0.000 $ 175,000 $ 200,000 $ 22�- $ 250,000 $1 000,000 �. )Z x-x�-x ,•x9E?Eif-3f-xyF-x..lfx-Yt-x-xiFDEH#x-i(-� i. - i�#DFDt#ii-)FyHQi-)EiEM#M-x-YctfM DEDEBHEx-x :t . r i LOCATION: t i 4 't Wam CAPITAL IMPROV NT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FUTURE TRUNK SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS f DIVISION5 Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Tigard Urban Planning Area PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 3 ily open land within the Tigard Urban Planning Area, Large areas of primar identified' in terms of probable drainage patterns and trunk alignments. No trunk extensions are planned in these areas under the current 5-year C.I.P. i Those areas identified include: West Durham Road (260 Acres); North Bull Mtn. (860 Acres); South Bull Mtn. (950 Acres); and Lower Tualatin (710 Acres). #!E#X-'k3(#3d-M-�AE##1t#Yc�i(-iE�#Dl-bt-�#�t#H•�(-'tE#�'3HE#DE#Xit#iE#N.-1FX-X#H-?f-MaE-DEM-1(•x�-D£-H-l(-M-H�t-DE#3E#St-?E�'%iE-M-DHF 1 ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: TOTAL: ae SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85_ FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89` TOTAL F _ ederal $ $ $ $ $-�—'-- State $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Cita $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T A T A L S yE#}(�H4-DF-H?EYt-DEi?i( H-H#X-)F'3t-3(-DtiE#TS-K#x'Dt-DtiHFh#K-DFiF-DF LOCATION, M�5 2 4t 1 ��: � .-Ys. .R. :aY.3TM*.,.,r .;�2�i ;•, :.Y'..�',xts r.—..„�• ♦. .x.l.,.s1��,,,,, ��. "IN wo I' a... ' Y `UR„s; a Ing vgg MESA MOM JF` i T . 4-.n•F.. : f■■i■\ � � !■/■■ \.�` clic � � ��_ .g 1i■ ■ m1■■ir LF �; / . �iiii■ ■ r ■ ■ ■NIS■WAR ■ OR Aiwz -§aY•�:,t5 .,. ,.. - ,v..s.,s 2"ST.:. .�_-, .: .5s Y^. r� � �.... ... �fi.,, :.. .-• r -,a'�2tyS n�'`� �. na '' IS'4 ��Fd U owti^�.�,Pr`-,-a.�t t;S.�`�c;�” .1�'.,e.-z+F ,.,•a...A-�k..�'s. � :�t4i,. h, a�`'s.;.,s.:�a�., �a«�$�;'�s_��n�sa:�Y'..��ti' ��'=��'i��+�-s�.��ri�,->,e!",�al�e�=�,��-s •x3n�i�-F',�'�;n�,.,;�,�..''..ca��,.e'� '"`.'-..a�'x�.��*;�-:'�s'�'„,,:5�> iT�.�.�'. CAPITAL IMPROVEMNT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL RKS PROJECT McDONALD AREA TRUNK SEWER DEPARTMEN-DIVISION r OpetBLIC ratio sOWastewater (212) PROJECT LOCATION: Central Section of City (151 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: in need of a major trunk line to Area is identified as a section' of City facilitate future development, and complete part of trunk line network in City. While the City Sewer Fund and LID'S remain possible funding ounces forthis ' inclusion of this rproject on an approved construction revere ea bond region, inc would provide _quick completion ' and ready access to surrounding connection to City sewer network. xi(K-)E3(-x-K-x-xitiE x-x##x H x-x-X-x X-X3(-xit a(-K-X)(7H#H x x x-x-X X ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4,000' of ell + 12" line @ $45 per lineal foot $180,000 TOTAL: $180,000 #t#X-K-x-H-X#H-x#x-xi(-K-1(-H-)(-x-X-x-x-XH-IFx-Tf#X-14-DFH-?E#x-x-34-##x#:t-K#x�-x�i x-?E�t-x-it-KiS-x-x-x-H-x-X-K IE-K-K-x K-X-x-x-x-Xi(-YcM-HiEit-1t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 8 7-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $_—___-- $ $�_J State $_.._---- $ $ $ City $—_-- $--- -- $ $ $ 180,000 Revenue Bondi $_.90,000 $ 901000 __----- $ $— $ 1S- 0 000 T 0 T A L S $ 90,000 $ 90'(00 _ $ Or disbursed a 1 expenditures proo m Sewer Fund. id-x-yHE#Ki(H#x-K-Xi4-2('kK-lt-x-KJd-H-�#-x3(3t-xiFxKif-Dt-X-xii=at#H-K-K•3iiE-H-x-Ki4#?fx-H#x-xiHEH-X-lE�t3{-H—�x-K-IH(x x-D(K-x-1(#x4 LOCATION: sa r Gs.w. a// S.w f3NNER �s Sw sem.iRT \Q-GY* CE 3. S.M. Mrt 1311 �T. AN sTCN1 . w •C1F ` `R , '"' w � KLN6Y ST y d � Yli. uOIR� 1! M0.L"Ew CT r IM,(IL 5 aril ai3 HA McCIX1lLC ST 3 L_ / ` ''lei/ Sa, ry£rrr O44ROE y. _ _� C SIT CHEER CT. E `. 1 Gt. S.N 4NN3 CP[(N CN S _ N T i _ ML NTLRIVIEw-_9 LNnE 5 71I _ .C[ 1 ,• S T „vc L yrARtiiwl ■RCEs LF o J !i w sK VIE-r TiR.NCE R�coR ° L o0o tt. a f Af v�A - • 1 - rt � `�56. *'1 ® ...,t f � IREz - .sw ___ ..... '[ _ICT. $ °el�'• II w�� TAN R �i it r / TNBR� rEMWP]tl a '.`- y a •aM1 n _- � '. .r ,� �..�- „�. L � � �,. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PARA PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SOUTH SIDE 99W REPLACEMEN'r DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION:'- Opetotions—Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Intersection of Main St. &`Hwy 99W south to Garrett St. k PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Current series of 8" & 10" 'sewerlines' inadequate, undersized, and in naed of replacement. Lines to be replaced with 12and 15" diameter lines. Replaces Tigard Utilities line, Frewing Orchard line, and Pacific Highway line. Most likely funding sources would be from City Sewer Fund. �-x-x-x��-x-x-zt-x=x-�-�-x-x-x-x-x-�t-�;t-x-x-x•�-u-x-xac3t-x-�-x-fc x-x-x-3s-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-�-x#x-xit-x-x-x-x-u-�t-x-x-xa�x-x-x-x-x-�t-xat-x-x�-x-x-�t-x-x-x-x• ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: ' 3,840' of 12" — 15" lines Q°$45 per lineal foot $173,000 4 n x, TOTAL: $173,000 �(•9E-xM-�-xi4-1HElF�f-3fi4-K#-x-x-xdtdE-H-M#3Htit-� (3E-x-3Eit-H-Yc-!4if-)t-)E-14��f-x-)t-xit:M-x-x-1E'x-DE#�E�(�t�:-34-3F-�-x-xiE-x-x�t-D4i(•�t-xiHE-!(-iE-3(-x-K-x-3E t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL s Federal State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Sewer Fund $ $ 173,000 $ $ $ $ 173,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ 173,000 $ $_ $ $ 173,000 .�. -x'� 3-�-x-�-��a>;-�'�-x-x x-x-�-�-:c-x•'x rc-x-x-�-x x-x-x-x-x-x-x-xac-x-x-� -x•�-sfx x-�x'�-x-x-x-xx-x-a>;x-�a-x-x-x-�x-x•��-x-x�• l 1 �Igy)j1 1114LL ST. sY LOCATION: C. �r xEADO \ n� A ELw GEL�yV �� CL Nt ST. LLLLL!!!!! /n Si-a c r � SM LT S ELI IIItTh�/per �4 1- 4W SX.AM ST- WAt. £ � N F �t�ST, ``� ryf• �4,� S�,C v�CA4epg0 � W � F N St 'a't S 09 a� x.. MOL ry: TO a SYI. S (�CARMEN:ST. ST.5T. `-WATNINS cW rcxxEx a s W GA MT' *�ti 4 a wr S / '•��:'_wur� `k OEAAY 2 f� 5 R t n r [`\l`\(`/ VAANi ST. : PAA' * ST sW � '��, r ✓ 4<� .�- � �"� `iIM_ sr. . J/ s u Mq�� ST. ` 4 S.W. 01ARA � ~• � 1 1 1 -: I.:��/.. � a / .. �swsw A� /� J� I � CNERdY S I S.k g FRI CAPITAL IMPROVEMEW PROGRAM PLAW PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WALNUT ISLAND TRUNK SEWERDEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: West section of City (995 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified' as currently outside City boundaries, in need of a central trunk sewer line to facilitate future development, as well as 'allow 'access of current residential units to City sewer network. Continued development without connection to -a sewer system impacts surrounding ,areas in the generation of possible'health hazards due to septic tank seepage. Probable funding sources would be through i formation of LIDs, although inclusion of this project on an approved construction revenue bond would facilitate its completion. -x-�-3E�(-if-x#3E-3F x-x#iE�#• x-x-x-x-x-x-DE-kHE-�3t-H->E3(-x-x-M##i(-x-M-x-}(u#x-x#x-x-x-x=x-)E�( ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 6,240' of 10° line @ $45',per lineal foot $280,000 TOTAL: $280,000 SEM-D4-DE�M-:I-��cY�-+i'icn�n-)E-M-K-M(i(-N X3(-�-M-M-#if-2Hk'P.-n-ic-"ic-n�-M•#i(-M-R-K-X-M-DHt-Df-Df#!S-1:#iF3hM-D(-�E##3EM-9EHDHEiE1tiQ#k-1Fri-H-)4-H-M-ff# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL. Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ - '$ $_ $ LID $ $..100,000 $ 100,000 $ $ $ 200,000 Revenue Bond* $ $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $_ $ $,80,000 T 0 T L S $ $ 140,000 $140,000 $-- $ $ 280,900 Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund i'r##-$fX-X-M3EDfiFS4-)B-AI-%:;�a-x�c-n-PS#K-4iiHt-2HHi-i�-9HEifiYR#H-I(#Hrh-N-1###3F-K#K-`.d-M#3(-M#JS3(-}4#H#,-'.f•Dt-Y.-3HF�-?f-ii-1(#}f-M#?FF(-i4Dt M-DE LOCATION: ( // LI R106E� • ro]`_36 f.T. Kan01 CT. 3 W u^ 5T N '�i ttT_il$li'.2'lWTin1 °qQ0 Fp sK Ka �y 4 sSM.A"sT. y ♦*LX qf- i• _ r all _ M IE * r CT. �r.TT � eti s�.p� ♦ �'"� sk� � '.\ a - � •1 CAP.NEX 57 sW. OXME. F ;� ALW— sT. 1VaTK RIS s.W fONX£R < fW -ice Fti' sr. p$ ql °fyt�. 1 1 ST. y qY' W R01 V p' u v CT f�K1NRVEX WPt V% , 3 p. S� s EOOEWOOO ST. LI 4� 1.6 LX 'IIiWMOUYP vi � .fr -> �..W s..r. CAPITAL IMPROV PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WALNUT ISLAND ANCILLARY DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS TRUNK SEWERS DIVISION: . Operations—Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: West section of City (995 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area' is identified as currently outside City ;boundaries„ in need of ancillary trunklines to facilitate future development and complete part of trunk line network in area. Placement of trunk lines in this region would facilitate its development, as well as minimize the possibility of health hazards arising due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage and high ground, water. Probable funding sources would be through formation of LIDs, revenue bond, and ' as co,ditions of development. �Hi-Mei•#-H 1t#x-'i-M-B(�Hf-HiF�-Df#)E�{#�`�-YHE�HE-H-H-1t-X-H-'#jf-x-k�t#x-M-)fat-Yc-n-"i.".�.i#3E#-DHFM�E-HiEf�fE##-3f-3E-3t k#3EK-FHF-k x#xifit-)E'i£-1E I ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 85186 Line D`— 2000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 FY :86/87 Line A 2000' of '8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 FY 87/88 Line C — 3000' of 8" lines @'$45 per lineal foot $135,000 FY 88/89 -Line B — 4450' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $200,000 TOTAL: $515,000 ##�F-H#)f-M-M 3t-H-H�-D(}i#DE�)E-K-M-?EX#1(#3'r1f-H-id DfdHh3f-H-DHE?E3f#T'43E-x-lE3i#3f-M-Tt-�-D'c-H-�-IEX-�F3(#H K K#�H3'r#-)F#'M-M#SHf-YHFi(-bfaE#M-lE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86--87 FY 87-88 ' FY 88-89 TOTAL $ $ $ $ Federal StateCity $ LID $ $ 45,000 $ 90,000 $ - $ $ 135,000 Revenue Bond# $ $. $� $ 130,000 $ 65,000 $ 200,000 Developer $ $ 45,000 $ $ $ 135,000 $ 180,000 T O T A L S $ $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 135,000 $ 2-0—,-0-00 $ 515,000 Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund -)Eif#:E',l-x#DE-x-P�if-tEtf-x- x-3Exit-x-x-x#if#',eDf-M3(iENcx-x#x-if3S-)f-x-�t-?Ex-x-x-$Ex�E##�#sEM-DF LOCATION: T F { "�- 31 L3M1 SW. / � �LJ� 9�II CREJ. 3`2 NE w A ERME ST. 3 � { /jOv (725 RIW 1 NINNY U 1 G RID6T IF EYE, i Q �ST.P 1 a _ t• -AIM O,yy SW.ANN ST. $' .P V- SWC p m SW T 1 �• 'ah R sw sw. tm+ELL sr. Sw. Y S.M.' FII N IE.Fr N T,Olt30�. ® i Y~ rE �/ rER� STA Nu Kq N T GN sT ST. SIY. F 1\\\ CPRMEd S.W. P :WATNINS ® Pp! °iJ l 3.W FONN&R S W GR NT .( ERA' GEL _ O (`\ p SJ,SW. MARION ST. ibfs AN SW. GAR ST. mi 1 r :' r!C " / �P ih � ai 1 LN. r• e o � I .. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN 4 PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: L.ITTLE' BULL MTN SANITARY SEWER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations--Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: South section of City (245 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as partially developed residential region suitable for ` continued developmentand infill. s The uneven pattern of development in area has mitigated against the regions connection to the :City-wide sewer network. Possible health hazards result from the lackof sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water 'tables. Placement of 'initial 'collector` lines in area will facilitate development and minimize health hazards. Probable funding sources would be through formation of LIDs and as conditions of development. H H tFH#kFiE�Q K H 3E#x x H x�FaEM iE1E##it 3E x H x 3E H 3E)g M H x#x�c H H#if�Y H 3(H x H YEii H�6 x3f u Jf H H x H?Ft DHi3f x H kt H x DE H H H�(H H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 85/86 N 100th/Inez'- 3000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal ft $135,000 FY 86/87 Murdock St 1775' of 8 lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 80,000 . FY 87/88 S 100th/Sattler/98th - 3300' of 8" line @ $45 per lineal foot $147,500 FY 88/89 Sattler/96th/Hoodview - 4450' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $147,500 TOTAL: $510,000 �('X #H#-Hit-?f-H-H-M�4�Q##-H-YE#9E-H-H-Y.-)f-H-H-)E-M-M#�#-H#3�H-H-H-D(•#-HSE-H-H#M#fEH3E-M-)i-�3f H-Hi4-'R#-H�E3Q-H-DE�t#H-H# F SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 ' FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State City LID $ $ 135,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 385,000 ' Developer $ $ $ 30,000 $ 47,5CO $ 47,500 $ 125,000 { T 0 T A L S $ $ 135,000 $_80,OCLO $ 147,500 $ 147,500 $510,000 i ##F{-H3E#lt-H-H-H-H-H-H#H-H-H-�H-H•3f-H#H-1£-��t-}FHi{-H-H#H-DE-��h)t-H-H'kH-?f-H-H'r(-PE3H(-H-H-3t(Hii�E YEH-DE HH-Yr}i-H Hi:iEH#Hif3FH-H#H-#-H�t LOCATION: L• /L_'S.' "1 1 a°"y L J � CREEK.CL FANM, C i 1 - N W S.w. aC�N'aR(�rIEW LANE v:FW TEP Ar.E �" E a = T•. gffi MI'IN - ° , W 2 AC. Fwtr[m Oar / LN_ S.W. Y. PCS � PEKBRCOK „ NSW a PINE9R'�� u IL T ST i P CT. E R( a 1'j Ltl C,s'TE N :431M U FEIUls HTS. � i7 I I CR. SATIER I NCatRC f S.b. YEEW S.W. T. -may 1 R053 T. e 5 uI I \ KaaLE.L a,rcP N' +9 CRVE _ i,'I 1 SWC-E W I aSF `s n ' LN. y P![as£ �J _ �.. A . CCRCLWN LP 1 I I °tar Nia° �eT s a 1 1 i - i 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENiT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT : ALDERBROOK AREA TRUNK SEWERS DEPARTMENT:: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations-Uastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central section of City (100 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as centrally located, open land, and -subject to imminent development. The regions suitability for residential development, and subsequent susceptibility to possible health hazards due to lack of sanitary ' `sewers, suggest placement of initial trunk lines. Probable funding sources would be derived from conditions of development. #iE#k-k-k-k-H#h�i k-k�(#k-k�t-k-�(-k-k-k-DE-k-k#if-k#k iE�4-k:E#H-k#k k-k�T�jE-H-H#k k k#-H k-k-M-DE•H-Hi(#k#k-M-k#k-k-k)E-H-H H k#k-M-H ' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST.: 4000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $180,000 TOTAL: $180,000 #k-k-k-H 3F-k-k#H#?E-k;:-k�E-k-MSE-k Hi(-H#-k-H-Mzc�4-k-?(-k-k#(�4.7i-H#�-DE�Eif-k-kiE 1(-H k-k#k-H-H k#YrTE"k-k#•H•k-k k#k3f3Fk kif-k-k-H-k#H H"lE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84•-85FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL_ - 1 Federal $ $ $ $ $— .State $ $ $ $ $ $ City Developer - $ $___90,n0O $,_ 90,000 $ $_ $ 180.000 T 0 T A L S $ -- $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ __ $ $ 180,000 •H-H-H##k-SE,`�k-M-HSS H-H-H�t-k#3Fi£-k3(-H3tH-)EDEN-H-D(-k k-k-H-k M-k-:(#3fX-X-Y.k-k-k-k-ii••k kk-k-Df-?H4-Hi(#kk-k-H-k-H#k-H-H-3HEit-k-M-k-k#H-k-DE 11 o. II VN.: "v.- N>LLVIEW CT t LOCATION: �"eSyZt i 3�.- 2/rLc00NALC 5T �� ,� rte/ RIF, ' ELaosE _! CREEL CT.^$ \ S N i1{/ _ e b +3 CT ��''{{\\\\\ ' S FANNO R DR. i ~ MO MT#Ntr:EW LANE � L 0 O _ •- N W r V10 #FOES LP ga r ; ay VIEW TER#CE 'SW IMLL #T. I D 0 NI(T • JL. rW SPY 1r 'S•W' .....��..ttt J �ffi �'D^i' W .::t � IY.ES s ..- .`.1 N•T r, v p �� PEY#RDOL i'1`JI # �:ST 6 #TR T W Sw „ R.RE#ROOi' - A MUM tat 1 r. LKONTE /^ DR 5x •f. 5#T Tt ER[v• T 1 / 1111 5 W. NOOOVI[x � R055 ST M1 SW a!D E MVE A. _ .tt•vt ryutnt OORBININJPL�t: �� ! - _ 15011 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SANITARY SEWERS LIDs DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations--Wastewater(23.2) PROJECT LOCATION:' City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Unsewered areas in the City not connected to sanitary sewer network, : but within reasonable proximity to existing trunk lines, provide' suitable , conditions for formation of LIDS as a 'means to achieve- connection. Many of such areas' identified are primarily residential in "`character, and often suspected of possible health hazards due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water tables. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 84/85 estimated LID projects City-wide $150,000 FY 85/86 estimated LID projects City-wide $175;000 FY 86/87 estimated LID projects CAty-wide $200,000 FY 87188 estimated LID projects City-wide $225,000 FY 88/89 estimated LID projects City--wide $250,000 TOTAL: $1,000,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ State $ $_ $ $ $ $ - City $ $ $ $ $ $_ LID $ 150,000 $ 175,000 $ 200,000 $ 225,000 $ 250,000 $1`000,000 T O T A L S_ $ 150,000 $ 175,000 $ 200,000 $ 225,000 $ 250,000 $1,000,00 (t i(iQ Hii#i4 34?�H M iQ3t H�EDHFH H M it DAN H H iE H 9FH3Q FE#i Hii#M,E H#H 4 H H k H X M MiE#x H#HiEH 3(it D£H HIE K H Hit H-H-K-H-H-DEH-#-H-x-H-H-H-* LOCATION: "�. t .�.. e\ - P d l '� o> '..6� �77 4� �W yq�' k ��: �.. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: DURHAM ISLAND SANIIARY '.SEWERS DEPARTMENT. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations—Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast section of City (222 acres) PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Area is 'identified as suitable for moderate to high density reside+ltial' development (R-7, R-5, A-12), with potential for rapid growth. Placement of initial trunk sewer lines in this area will facilitate its economic t development. Probable 'funding sources would be through LID's and as conditions of development. #xxk#xxxx�txx>fxxxxxxxxxxx#xxxx# x xstxxx-x-xx-xxx-x-*X*"-xx-xx-x-xxxxxxxxxxx#xx#xxx-)(-XX-x-xx ESTIMATE;OF PROJECT COST: 5,000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot: $ 225,000 TOTAL: $ 225,000 ##1ixHxxxHxxx#x##ifxxx***x-x-x#x-x-x-x-x-x-xxxy(-W*****KIElE#x?tD )fxi(xxi4x#x-x*-x-xxx�xItx�(xxxxxxX## SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89_ TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City _ $ $ _ $ $ $ $ LID $_108,000 $ $ $_ $ $ 108,000 Developer $ $ $ 58,500 $ 58,500 $ $ 117,000 T O T A L S $ 108,000 $ $_ 58,500 $ 58,500 $_ _ $_225,000 #x x x)4)II x x x x#x###k x it-*-x-X-"-x-*X-x-K-X**-x-x-x-x-x X-N-xi*x iH(?(J(xiE#H 3(#x x X WX _ I r,l .. � • cE ---:.—..:�'taP.:�.a.� - � ti- .ncf_s c.P� �, �S^. LOCATION: YiErw TEFa.C< a "( .rt fPVi)p S W. IRCI ST. v z--/�S ODhIT � fl0l0 z�: c ---- .c.t EZ � PCT. [t 9✓, / l ; - PEYBROOµ ST \ I-S ♦ ! SIRE r~ •`-� i0.. ,rteµT D0. �r5t•- - o '-4 ST Sr - / 1 DP CT Ba 54Trl ER a — 1 1 ,ppDY:rpp�i Sr •r A fl055 Yy w1. Tw c �1":") �. �I� , .•II —%.w_ e • l_./ RFK£ VVV SnR E �I DR vE` � r � i I j �I aw .fe W 6RBU9 VJP •�4 '....,-•,ra«r t i a I -�-- .� 1� SNI M S< DURHIY RMO R A I wAY P TOP ort S COOK� 5'+J � -�Ul14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRAM PLAN PROJECTDETAIL PROJECT: WALNUT ISLAND TRUNK SEWER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: West section of:City (995 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ' Area is identified as currently outside City . boundaries; in need of a central trunk sewer line to facilitate future development, as well as:allow access of ` Continued development current residential units to City sewer `_network. without connection to a 'sewer system impacts surrounding areas in the generation of possible health hazards due to septic tank seepage. Probable funding sources ;would be through formation of LIDs, although inclusion of this project on an approved construction revenue bond would facilitate its completion. xx3titxxxxxM�Sxi(xx�E3Ex-DFN-k-x �(xxxxxxxx-x-xxYxxxxxxxx�(x##x �(#lcxxx'ExxxxxxxT x3f ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 6,240' of 10" line @ $45 per lineal foot $280;000 TOTAL: $280,000 #xxxAExxDFPH(xxxx2cx?txxx%i(xxxxx-x#xx�ExlixiHtxxxxi4x�E# xx-xx-x-K-X*"-K**-Y-xx xlExxxxxxxxxxx3E3iaExx SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN l' FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal State $ $ $ $ $ Cid $ $ — $— $ $ $ _ LID $ $ 100,000 $ 1oo,000 $_ $ $ 200,000 Revenue Bond* $ $ 40,000 $--4-0-,0—PQ- $ $$ $$ 80.000 $ $ $ — $ $- T o T A L S $_ $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ $__ $ 280,000 :i Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund a�-x-xitx-xx-ic-�xat�c-x-a;-x-x-x-x-x-x�rt-x-x-x-x-x-xaE#�c-x-x-qt-x-x-x-�x-x-x-x-x-x-x-►�"-x-tFx-xX-X-x-x-x-x x-xx-x�x-x-x-x-x-roux-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-tE LOCATION: LI )I LSc ERKE STU N p �^Y.i i a_C_.�K. ��S KA-f1 CTT t 0 ti S.� T 9 Q,a •C' 1 R:D6E ; LL ^ w v 'I Li CLYDESW 3 � J." A SY_ANN sT. g tlL�-Xli SWC s7 3C aw S 'VE ; � 'A 4. S• yf .AA• wf1 i. .4LR CT� u S.R. CAAMiX sT. S W. • y. y. /� ''3 WAicINS W d,Jt I 1 C tc� sW. ALEERTA ST, :`A •� is � / y^ S �•//P. lAMEs R0. r,• I h��'ITy/`W`�49`CT OFAAY OEL F 1) �C s sW. MAI sr . i AMptA fl � � a. - RI LM. s.00�j? '1YE4 sA' ED0EW000 ST Wee _ �M' _ 1//T�`/J/•qt' „ CAPITAL IMPROVErEW PROGRAM PLAN ;. PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WALNUT ISLAND ANCILLARY DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS TRUNK SEWERS DIVISION: Operations--Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: West section of City (995 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ; Area. is identified as ager future development y outside city band dconplete nparLdoFFtrunscl line trunk lines to facilitate network in area. Placement of trunk lines in this region would facilitate its development, as well as minimize the possibility of health hazard"s arising due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage and high ground water. Probable funding sources would be through formation of; LIDS, revenue bond, and a as conditions`of development. xat-x�-xac-x-x-x-x-x��tx-x-x-xac-xat�x-x-x-�-x-xx-x-r�x�a-x•x-�x�cx-x x-x-x-x-x��t-x�t-x-x-x-x-x-x�txx-x-�-x�c�xx-�x�-x-x-x-x-x-xaax-x-xY ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 85/86 Line D – 2000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ `90,000 FY 86/87 Line A – 2000' '0f 811 lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 0. ' FY 87/88 Line C —3000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal 'foot $235,000 FY 88/89 Lime B —4450` o <@ $45 per lineal foot $200,000 f 8'I lines TOTAL: $515,000 #iE#x-x-x-x-x-x-xic#x)t-x#H-K-x-x-x-x�t-x-x-x-yH(-x-x]F#x-x-x-x�t-x x-xiE1Ei(-x-x-x-x-x-x�E-x-x-x�'�-x-xi(-xiE-tE�i-x-xit-x H jFx-x-x�(-x-x-x1E�f-x'xE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY $4-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-g8 FY 88-89 TO_ TAL .; Federal $_ $ $ $ $ $ - State $ $ $ $ Cites $ $ $ 135,000.. $ 45,000 $ 90,000 $ LID $ ----- $ $ 135,000 $ 65,000 $ 200,000 Revenue Donde $ $ 45,000 $____ $ $ 135,000 $ 180 000 Developer $ _— $ $ 90,000 $_135,000 _ $ 200,000 $ 515,000 TOT_AL S $ 90,000 r Fund Or disbursed as annual expenditures from # xxxtEx �catxxxx�cxxxxKx #x-x-x x-x-AHt�t-x-x-1t�(-x-xis-x-x�t-X�-xx-x-x-x-x-x-x-tF3E#-M-x � LOCATION: a��I S.W. / -;� I I F X aC ( TIS RIW^I �L1 T3N GTMiP.INE fT. � N � _ A (yv (T2: R I W 1 a iRMIY n n i /J YCT• 3 '3�0.YDE5 � - ` Sy.AHN ST-1 4 ^ fSt RAREte.�yj W J l• e 4 sr ry°' S I� fVl 4d S.M FRNOL.•_.ST. i-!e wJ s A! r J N CT SW <FRM iMT 'y M T 1ST. • AG:AREN ST. ®so. F N R f N 'WATtINi , - �q &W. ALBERTA ST. D //+� FONNER y� :W GRANT { @( G� �/ Si. ORG�Gt OER•.Y GEL ANES RD 3 1 h1)//L�•,W .f O!. n/ Sr. FARA ! i! / / Mr • p i CT FA+ANA`IEN. W� �- s W nota aI'f°♦ � ,"� f CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT:" LITTLE BULL MTN SANITARY SEWER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations'-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: South section of City (245 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified " as partially developed residential region suitable for continued development and infill. The uneven pattern of development in area has mitigated against the regions connection to the--City-wide sewer network. Possible health hazards :result from the lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water; tables. Placement of initial collector lines in area will facilitate development and minimize health hazards. Probable funding sources would be through ' formation of LIDs and as conditions of development. ESTIMATE, OF PROJECT COST:, FY 85/86 N 100th/Inez — 3000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal ft $135,000 FY 86/87 Murdock St — 1775' of 8" lines @`$45 per lineal foot $'80,000 FY 87/89 S 100th/Sattler/98th = 3300' of 8" line @ $45 per lineal foot $147,500 FY 88/89 Sattler/96th/Hoodview — 4450' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $147,500 TOTAL: $510,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ LID $� $ 135,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 385,000 Developer $ $ $ 30,000 $ 47,500 $ 47,500 $ 125,000 s T 0 T A L S $ $ 135,000 $ 80,000 $ 147,500 $ 147,500 $ 510,il00 LOCATION: j-, LANECREEK CTE� FO y0NT4MVIEW_ - S yl.l1�. M ST. Yd W A' vIEW TER ACSW rl 6 LN S.W. o ' IEMMCOK S STAE T � (�Sw�rIINESR00� E Q d tCx l�OR ^T ` A wasLT u TO •y = +I 1 , A Y Ci. E ct� �iLINv n ST 'I 'LYONT[ � -EL � cr. �1 +NTS. t` 1 04 CT . QSW: NOOOvl[W 5W ` 54 TIER 1I ( A055 ST•; `Tel SW K0.ELE ST s, KAi1LE ' � ,ll.il ter �EMrY .��..-�•�.. fT 1' ^1 _ cr OOROWN VL.r� � l' n��l�� ` •'•n 4i��a' ver<y� �)�\�y��'. t ' .'� �1 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: ALDERBROOK AREA TRUNK SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC: WORKS DIVISION: Operations—Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: South-centralsection of City (100 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION:' Area is identified as centrally located, ,open 'land, and -subject to imminent development. The regions suitability for residential development, and subsequent susceptibility to possible health hazards due to lack of sanitary sewers, suggest placement of initial trunk lines, Probable funding sources would be derived from conditions of development. X.x_x -x x.x-H-K x-X-x-K*X-x x-x H-*-x x-x-X*X-A X*X-x x K-x-x-H H-"-)(-H#x-X# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $180,000 TOTAL: $180,000 c (##)Ex)txxi(i(�fHx�fxxMxDf#3iHi(i(Hxx#HKHMH)EHKxxx)CHxitKit?(xx)E#xxx�(xHi(MMxxXHH?1Ex)(x3(H�ExHH3fif)E s SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-83 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $' $ $ $ State $ $ $_ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $-. $ $ Developer $ $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ $ $ 180,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ $ $ 180,000 i(#x3Q#H#x x x-"-K**x x X x K xi(xjt x H x H xi(x)()(fit)FH Hif x H Dfx H k►i x�E bFx xiE3t x x Dl)F LOCATION: t o �- -• C E ONT CNEE4 CT d / �I 4 Sq-EAM f.w :iTMvl . E _ Er•' LL D11. r•f _ - iE__v.. i VW. TEM ACE z'� � �_�a E• fuLE fT ' f,y, ';^ • T T. PENlTy TO K =ar„A f`OR tRD t E 'T 3 E LAM MEIU:W St LYORTE a SwR.. „ fs ,bDOVKb fW fAiTICR •, ' 'l5 d^ MF MOSS fT � / r� �� iR ♦,f"t sw A. �T MI1L 4a cR< M y fr � � DOw RUR4 PL. � i' r CAPITAL IMPRMEMENT PROCRfM-PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SANITARY SEWERS LIDS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION:.` Operations-Wastewater(212) ' PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: e City not Unsnwered areas in thconnected to sanitary sewer- network, but ` within reasonable proximity to existing trunk lines, provide suitable ny of conditions for formation of are primarily -residential to chin echaracter, and a often such areas identified S as a meansP suspected of possible health hazards 'due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water tables. `Qx-�E-,4.iQ#-x-x-xid#x-x-x-x�c-�#�t x'iF-?E-?Fx-x#x-Dt�Fx#x#X�f#x�f-x-Ti-x-x#x-Da-tF#-x#3E-IE-x M-x-x#iE3t-x-x)t-x-M#H-x�(-xif K-x-iE-x x#x x x# � ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $150,000 FY 84/85 estimated LID projects City-wide $175`,000 FY 85/86 Estimated LID projects City-wide $2QO,Q00 FY 86/87 estimated LID projects City-wide $225,000 FY 87/88 estimated LID projects City-wide $250,000 FY 88/89 estimated LID projects City-wide TOTAL: $1,000,000 ;t x-x-x�c#xx-xic�t-x-x-x�t-x-x�:•x�c-xi-�c-x#x x�t-x-x xit-x-x-x-x-�.E -x#x•�x x-x��i x�c-3t-x-x##x-x#x#tt-x;-x#x#x-x x-xit#x . SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY '88-89 TOTAL Federal State $ $ $ $ City $ $ $------- - it $ 150,000 $ 175,000 200 000 225 000 $$ 250'000 1,00U,000 $ T O T A L S $ 150 000 $ 175,000 $ 200.Ofl0 $- 225 000 $_250 000 $1 000,rJ00 iF#-YcYrx-H�E#iHE�(3EtE#�� '/t�'� "x-��4-x#x-K-1i�E3Eit xx#PE'x-3HE�t"x3H``•At-x-x',4#3EK#x-xif-x##i4#•x-x-x-H#x',H(-#ihx-x-x-)F LOCATION: i k5 P RE1ON1lNATELY a UNSEWERED AREAS Outside Inside- City _ City { %T OINVE 9C TT C sw S : C/ S.w W= � /Tigard St . F d • s c , , 6o' 13 A. Sw TARGET fa ea ,Ar60 SW '^NXTRE �1 Y£ADOW II .( ♦ ]`\ KA O IT Sw Y S. ,.. i.„ �i tt'iDESDAIL�� q0 R• ELN �+ 4aa• � Sb. N� g 1 f<T4�1, '4f W k,� tf H(F4030 + i., S. M ♦ V vE 5T ; _ 0To ?,{P w4 vl ` �� + (� O \ 'f6 v: C p j•' I/ ti ` ,I--�� t T. S Hfa bsw. - 99 •! / .:®�6 J) ST. 3 o. @V~ CON ZV iw. Derr $ T; B` C!`�` Tri r YPP 4F4 ~�, pQ L . ; QST• Q e i OM1 O i -- - a �' f spa H , 7`�e�� Rolling � . � i.. /`M M Acre `` - R � n CT 6ART11NE c f w.�l SANOT. 4' VIEWND vi W NRLNFV.'3T McDonal t 1A�+a. -- 'ffw��' u. rry /� p 1 / v i 14 BAAROE .. P.K PL. 4 t` S u3fl ws ,` , y IE CT I50 Acres Vn L�o A \ f i T !_, C—arde Area t �� 5' ANNO / ' 20 .Acres 3 •INT M 4N * __ G j• (\/ 4 ]1 V • %ROES LP/�\ Iw at T B IT 1 i. owiy go i.w. IRE2 9 s.v. G-VPeaRRooa �,J � p 3L 6 a f w. NF W. w PINEPR� E $a I.�ttle �g a� 11 Y a T A81L!]IO ] T Bull q F Mtns I1 x Alder-brook w• Q " 2�5 Acres .., - £Area✓ w aA /Durham Island. 1 �i Area 222 Acres e ' a 100 A W QRIVE .. _ - �; LI r4A, TaA � u dP // - 410�W,a E�RF�—•� YY4 �- Y4 T 0.tl.p ' L V FoupRAw RD. d YARTII fr] CT./ RMG a Ci � LIA ft.IIKS 4 YA c��P HILLKENT t I � //�� c11 aK sp \CEJ F ✓ '3N �L! i� Z �� Fb. fINULAY ROAO (PIT) pR�vt��ST-. �� i '' e�••^. Rox r,. L MW IN a n v {11�ps ] ...••-LaP00�1 RD R 11 ��`/1�'y�� weFwn.. �I.../Y /i\ P.� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FUTURE TRUNK SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION:. Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Tigard Urban Planning Area PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Large' areas of primarily open Land within the Tigard Urban Planning Area, identified in terms of probable drainage patterns and trunk alignments. No trunk extensions ;are planned in these areas under the current 5-year-C.I.P. Those areas identified" include: West Derham 'Road (260 Acres); North Bull 'Mtn. (860 'Acres); South Bull Mtn. (950 Acres); and Lower Tualatin (710 Acres). #-x#lt#►Eit-x#:t-u-)t- �#�E�E-�Ht-1E#3i-M-x-x-?F-:Ex-H-141(-3t-)Edf-�t ' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: TOTAL: �4-x-�-?4-�-}i#ri#�{-M-Y-14-)t-li-3(�-DFr4�4-WciEit-%sE#�#�t�-Di'�fii�HIEY:-xii�(-?t-bE$E#-YEyH4-x-�-i[-1H(-1E'A-#iE-1F14-x3t-)t-1E-M343d-MiFli-x-x-H-)E-14-3i#'IiaE�Yc SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN * FY 84-85 FY 8-:, FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State City TOTAL S aa-x-�-x��a�4-x-z�x-)c �x�-1�-x�x-tt-x-x-�-a�m4-x-x14�t- �r:x-x--3t--x-;�,;�;�:x->H4-x-x-x-x-� -six-�•>E��-r;� LOCATION: r; , s M a Y Y as F "'666 � v�. � ;,x�®■1� .- � �• � �� 'fix F� .;� H ■■ice ` �� 1■■■■■L* fits. ��•� �/■t' �. !�_ - � � ��Jtiiiii� rte,\i► ,.� :1■■� ��'�,�,r MENNEN MEN LMS t'■;/ k ��■ii■■ ■fir �_ �� ENE soMEN kWN ` L. z 'x ■ 1/■ ■ ■■ ■■ irk■■EN ■iN ■■ ��i�■ �4 � :o it --rr-- • ..a.,,� _s_,:�..,g x-.- -_.: --:.vz """ �` k. Y : �s:S. -tea'' a �..'tr .!; ."'air - •„+`�" tee' �"r � - , .�.., ,-.rt �. � ... .,.�„ .- �,� r• 7�t- Ts & �-�c' ��,3t�#: a'xe. �, �^,.. �. :may; ` 's'-.a'.x`w.. r� ��3{i' � �rt"�.x^�3��*'r �§$��T�+s:,, "u3 r��._ ,.'�....e. .,- es::'.. ��..,.v. ... ..� .�n �Y.a.-s•°' �' .•a: �-� E-� .,,�±.,m: �;�`��rn-,wi'.'�`! 4;ia.�-'�r.z��-''it-'..�'r��..l+F;�I�S`C'�`�•��,�,.�-....h. 4�z�;�: �"�5_:- ��.v.N�.,��'.`"»� •.:::,�Yi',':��s:�a;-'�;�^w':�-.'�?r�.,fr&s.�..��='�: `h.!�,'�.�.:�k3+'i'y f:�u.•� ��x.��;_.-:�� s*a,r_::�•, �__ C� 1 �. �� . �. CAP TAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN � I f PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT DURHAM ISLAND : PUBLIC WORKS SANl`fARY SEWERS �IV�SIONNT'Operatio s-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast of City (222 acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: i Area is .identified as suitable for moderate to high density residential k ' A-12), with potential for rapid growth. Placement of development (R-7 R-5, initial trunk sewer lines in this area will facilitate its economic development. ces would be through LID`s and as conditions of Probable funding sour ' development. . . �-x-x��x-x-x-x x-tE-xaE-x-xxx-x-x-�t#t�x-x x x x x-x aFx-x x-x xx x x-x-x-x-x x-x x x-x#x#aux-x-x-x-x-x-x x-x-x-x-x-x-x-xaEx�t x-x-x x-x�c-x#x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 225,000 5,000' of 8" lines 0 $45 per lineal foot: TOTAL: $ 225,000 #DEik-x-x-x-x-x x-DFi(-x-3E,�c##�4#x#xlF-x�t-x-x#M-x#3t-x-x-3Fx x#x-x x-xxlt-x-x-x,`E-x-x#x-x�t-x-x#-Xcit-x-x-#-)E x-x#x-x-x�EX-'�Ex-x-Dt-x-x-x-x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88_ FY 88-89 TOTAL._ Federal $ — $ _ $____ $_ State $ $ Cit_y__ $ $_ __� $ 2.81. LID $ 108,000 $$ $ 58.560 $ 58.500 $_____—. $-117,000..- Developer $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 108,000 $ $_58 500 $ 56,500 $______ — $ 225,000 �, �, ., , ACE ••LL�Je. of a4N`IT R6L0 LOCATION: t — vlEv iCR�:tC w gJv' S T - W Pit *7711,^,yy y - OQ S n 15- • p A 1 \ CMOROD" Y•iVl SfR T" L 3 „ RNf�CD � 2� w w QST To 1' S } E ; � :a• RCIUN4 1-t. LpONTi p:RN . CT ,f /'- � CT ,1 „ S� SATTIER••, � RO35 STT. Sys �;. Sw. 11OCOY,EH a T N 3 .- 1 ns '11 y w- 71 Sw RAR E Sit 1 I I NApLE ST. Se.N Q ,: 5, �1:F•tl1/CLV V ¢� ORIYE• 1'I N011 MJRN JVL��•� H ,I LN. T. J M+ _.l t a I C� Sw GOORiSL-�� 1 / J LIA �� cT p1mi IM; son CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WALNUT ISLAND ANCILLARY DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC,WORKS "TRUNK SEWERS DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: West section of City (995 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as currently outside City boundaries, in need of ancillary trunk lines to facilitate future developmenu and complete Part of trunk line network in area Placement of trunk lines in this region would facilitate its development, as well as minimize the possibility ,of health hazards arising due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage and high ground water. " Probable funding sources would be through formation of LIDS, revenue bond, and as conditions of development. DFit M-i(iS-:f�(itit-SF##il-DHfit?Fx#xi4-Ycx x�Q#x-x�#-x-�-x-x#�t-x�l It-x x-x x-Dtit3E#-x�(-x#-x-x-:I�(it',E x-x�t-x-xiEx-14',t�t-x-x-1i#x-?(x-x-x-x-xiE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY '85/86 Line D — 2000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 FY 86/87 Line A — 20001 of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 FY 87/88 Line C — 3000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot FY 88/89 Line 8 — 4450' of 8" Tines @ $45 per lineal foot $200,000 TOTAL: $515,000 �t-3E##x-x-x-�t-x-xiE#dEx-ld-x�F#'x-x-x-1H(-x-x-x-Df�-x-PE x-x-x-x-x-x it-YF'st-�E-x-)E'rF#-x-x-x-x-x-K-x-x-36-xaF3t-x-x-x-x3F#3t-x-)E#x-x-x#x-x-34-x-x#-x�t�E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-97 FY 87-84 FY II8—II9 TOTAL Federal State City $ $ $ $ $ $ LID $ $ 45,000 $ 90,000 $- $ $ 135,000 Revenue Bond $ $� $_ $ 135,000 $ 65,000 $ 200,000 Developer $ $_ 45,000 $ $ $ 135,000 $ 180,000 TOT ALS $ $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 135,000 $ 200,000 .$ 515,000 Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund �-x�t x3t-x�-tt�-3t-:t-x-x��c�t-x-xx x'��'x-xat-x-x-x-�c-x-x-x-x'�3t�-x-��x-jt-x•�i-x-�t-►c�Fx�x x->E ��t-x�c#x-x'�c-xat->F�#�'x'�#x-x�?,�t-� LOCATION: �✓—rvi i j - `\ �,i N E-Tis wlw 7 G LI vA&Mtw�ST. n RWBET Ll ♦ > 0 �J'� '-Li tt'!'IFSI� ' . cr. J r x s a L— - sT.l J ST. sx CAS Es',y SY.R1:N ygLM,1T iTl� _.—.—.ol ST. s I s« s � X11 � w x.7 ¢ sarM1T'L �' �. eti �r°V• r Ffc.r. s.a. ( NN. sA st 1i LN T. JLC _ s .I� S®�sw i�PoE ; A T Sa _ ^ GPAMEq sT. =WgTgl«s SM. AL9ERTA �_0. ,p4 s.w iDYNLM ZRANT ST. t R W.. ,RYES RD. ✓� n � n ♦ p / ' •�,c.w.u3R1ihY S •i o Akit/ F Sr ��,�ia��R� Sf So It f W ^ 2 T SSS CAPITALIMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN [ PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: LITTLE BULL MTN SANITARY SEWER DEPARJME:NT� 'PUBLIC WORKS bIV:CSION: Operations--Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: South section of City (245 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION. ' Area is identified as partially developed residential region suitable for E. continued development and infill, The unevon `pattern of development 'in area has mitigated` against the regions connection to the City—wide sewer network. Possible health hazards 'result from the lack of sanitary sewers, septic _tank seepage, and 'high ground water tables. Placement of initial collector lines in area will facilitate development and minimize health hazards. Probable funding sources" would be through' formation of LIDS and as conditions k< of development. 3 ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 85/86 N 100th/Inez — 3000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal ft $135,000 FY 86/87 Murdock St — 1775' of 811 lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 80,000 FY 87/88 S 100th/Sattler/98th;— 3300' of 8" line @ $45 per $147,500 lineal foot FY 88/89 Sattler/96th/Hoodview — 4450' of 8" lines @ $45 per $147,500 lineal foot TOTAL: $.510,000 x�t-x#x-x-x-x x-x-x-x-x-x-x�-x��-x-x��tat-x�x-x-x x-x-x x x x x x##x ac-x-x-x xat x x-x�c�x-x x�c-x x-xx-x-x-x-x#�a-x-x-x#-x�-x-x x-x-x•x-ac# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL — Federal $ $ $ _ $ $ $ State $_ _ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ LID $ $_135,000_ $_ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100 000 $ 385,000 Developer $ $ $ 30,000 $ 47,500 $ 47,500 $ 125,000 T 0 T A L S $� $ 135,000 $ 80,000_ $-147,500 $ 147,500 $ 510,000 LOCATION: L' /mow"i L=J U + CREEK CT E \ S h _ ELROSE S.W FAR,VO AIOUMTARIvifY, u .�V n K -C-1K17 - KROES LP t 001 _ �- u CE _ 2 u •((gfsl • N, 1 'T4 vEY, TERRACE n n TIS / IT. o } - SW. PV +SM IRf.Z Si. , S.W. !MT vcr a(.• ` PENBROOK U 5 IT � 9TRE 1 S. A PIRCYROO m n 3r;'` • ___ W__fl -1f ALI-V. URD ST ; y. . R i s WMLT a T�.j. µ, i.1 LCOnTE NTS II SA' "T SA TIER'1 ➢^ QS.. 'N VIEW R055 ST. °Ey i l i I ieiE.. : f A�p Tr,1 ♦AA�; OORRIRIM JPL! M} 11 t k CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE/HWY 217 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS REPLACEMENT DIVISION: Operations--Wastewater(212) 4 . PROJECT LOCATION: Western side of Tigard Triangle bisected by ,Hwy 217 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Current series of 8!' and 15" lines inadequate, undersized, and in need of replacement. Lines to be replaced with 10" and 18" diameter lines. Replaces parts of SW 79th Interceptor line and OEA trunk line. s XxxxxxHxxxx##�txkxXxX�fxx>Fx##Exxxxx�fxxHjExXxiExx�(xxxx�Exxxxx#3txx-x-x-xx�fHx#xiFxx#xx�(XxHx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 1500' of 101, & 18" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 67,500 t a r TOTAL: 67,500 $ ' X-x i SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $^ $ State City � $ $ Sewer Fund $_ $ $ $ 67,500_ $ $ 67,500 T 0 T A L S $ $ $ $ 67,500 $ $ 67,500 'eciix'k?'rxxiQ3FX1EX#Mxit�ti(x3Fxxx)ExxxxkXxXB(x#xxi(xx?(#XXxXxxx)FxX#i4xY�XxxXxxxiEXx3(i xxxx#iExxxXiE S.W. OVV�LL sT. LOCATION: ;- _ LE'RI� �_931GE X CT°' LN. II yT w_sw L II C4 :.�. I— �s' , YFAOJ'A' H s {I A fJE f r RlTNE IR 51� M `e^s`.tl- 44•Q, T - J 66LFFF.^^^+++!!! i...�.�.aroc10+ •^ ' ,'RO �k ~�9 `� F pIIT sT.N h fY ST ° c % SW. NFRAl04p S WN! ew T-0 n11N �... -S.W , ♦ ^b 1 CARMFW =WFLATKINs `' IV ` w �Ja / a$!y A`l swvARps ST. �� .�- ro� L IOtl � S a n. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: TIGARD STREET (11) AREA SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest section of City (60 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is :indentified as suitable for moderate to high density residential development (R-7, A-12), with potential for rapid growth. placement of sanitary sewers in this area will facilitate its economic development. Probable funding source would be from conditions of development. �t-x-x-x-x-xx#�-x-�x-xx-x x#x-,t-xx-x x x-x#xx-x-xx-xx-xx-x#x-x-x�x-x-x�t-x-xx-�x-x-x-k>c#x->Ex-xx-x-x x•x-�t-x-x-x-xac-x-xx-x-x-x-x-x#x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 2000' of 811 lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 d TOTAL: $ 90,000 xxxxxxxx2iHxxxxxxxxx#itxafx#xxxYFxJt3Exxx#x#xxx �(YDFxxx#xdcxxx#x xxxxxxxxxxiExxxx#xx?Exxxx SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86—P7 FY 87-88 - FY 88-89 ` TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $— $— $ — State $ $ $ $— $— $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Developer $ $ $ _ $ $—90,000 $ 90,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ $ $ $` 90,000 $ 90,000 - LOCATION: I.J ir. a LONGST IV/ ' N4Yl!!li BEA T MAN2 ANiTA ST w. rvORi OAAT/ STY 5 W ,� II Vit. II _ 5WLNaaA sUa \\ « SU.IvERpt N R L .ST j \'tK SL ; 5 w. T16ARU ST. SC T` 5 W. fh . R 1' bbf RCREST. OR.v��' LEp15 4. I j S[s Owl 'u `I �I i 1= t n LNSW 'ANGEL( ZIA EL ..I 13 Y q I AoV. MEAOOST.s I FA ON NIS Iw. "1tXTr1E �- NI ~` PL. �c--Ti�� 1l��\�� h 3RA_TNERINE ST. U' M wl� ° I .,`f \ e K RO'.'.'.111tLLY111CT •qhs (TITI: NIN) MlM.YY ur J L...J LLJJ 3 i CLY,SC—A r t CT 7 N • STN _ <, •Tl,. y 1 p. h 1 /' r• >� lu S� sW [RuoT sT, i Im OEM_ 1=111111k s CAPITAL IMPROVEMN9T PROGRM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SANITARY SEWERS LIDs DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations--Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Unseewered 'areas'; in the City not connected to sanitary sewer network, but within reasonable proximity to existing trunk lines, provide suitable conditions for formation of LIDS as a means to 'achieve connection. Many of such areas identified are primarily residential in character, and often suspected` of possible health hazardsdueto lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water tables. X XX X X#F D(x AF X#X Df3E3(X Yf x x X X 3EX#X X X X 9f#3(#3#X:HE#1l#i(X Xi!X90)E3(X X i Xif itt X 3i3cit X x X M X##}(3(#X X X)(-X-)4'A-X X X* ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 84/85 estimated LID projects City-{aide $150,000 FY 85/86 'estimated LID projects City-wide $175,000 FY 86/87 'estimated LID projects City-wide $200,000 FY 87/88 estimated LID projects City-wide $225,000 FY 88/89 estimated LID projects City-wide $250,000 TOTAL: $1,000,000 #X##x 7HH4-x##X-X 3i-X�(-X-x-X-X-KiHtXiEX-x-x-x-X-X-X#x-X-X-X�(-3t-X-X�f-x�(7f#3HE id-Xic ifjE•�f�S-X�t�X#X-xX#X-Xit-x-X X Id#x iE-X-X-x-X-X SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY '68-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ LID $' 150,000 $` 175,000 $ 200,000 $_225,000 - $ 250,000 $11000,00© T 0 T A L S $ 150,000 $_175 000 $ 200,000 $ 225,000 $ 250,000 $1,000,000 it•X-tEif-D:X-�aE3E•X#)f-Xi(3EX-3Ex-X-'.{-X-x#YFX-XatiEiE31-X-DE-Y(-X-DE#�(X-Xii#i(-i4#xa,(-Y.-DEX•�#in«=.X-)i'#-X-X-x•Ki(#•X#x-x-x-H-XiF#?(-X-Xif-X-X-lE LOCATION: s, F, S, cnT k �J C _ 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEIMENT PROGRAM PLAN 1, PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: TIGARD TRIANGLE SANITARY SEWER DEPARTMEN-I : PUBLIC: WORKS DIV`CSION': Operations--Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast section of City (300 Acres) . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Area is identified as currently undergoing rapid growth, and capable of attracting significant economic development in the near future. Placement of feeder trunk lines in this easily accessed area of commercial, professional and residential (R-10) land ;uses will facilitate its economic development. Most likely funding sources would be through formation of LIDs:. x-1 x-x-#x-x-x-x-H-H-H-x-M-x XIA#i(-H-x##-x-Hx H-H'*H-x-x X-X x x-x x##H##x x#x x H x-##x##x#x-x-x x-"x x x H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 84/85 N. 72nd Avenue - -1200' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $55,000 FY 88/89 S. -72nd Avenue - 1110' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal 'foot $50,000 TOTAL: $105,000 #MHxi�rHxxHH3E###xi(HifxxHxx#xxxxxx#-x-x##x-x-xxxxxKlE##xxxxH#xx#x#xx#lEH7Ex§t D(xx##x#x Kxt(Dtx# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN f} FY 84-85 FY 85-86 Fi.86--87.,- FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL 4, Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $_, $ $ _ $ City $ $.� $-- -- $— $ $ - LID $ 55,000 $ $_. $__. $_50,000 . $ 105,000 T O T A L S $ 55,000._ $___ $_________ $_ $ 5o,000 $ 105,000_ x#xDFitiQHxxi{ii3('AHH3Ex�txx�titx(xHHxxx##D(xHxKx #xitxxxHxx-x-x-x-xx-x-x-:(-x-x�-Hxx-H LOCATION: ST� sx ON Tr DAK94 )_T l 'TT- til 3 w Gfti FLE ST. sw. M.E AYE w Sw. CL.ii TIDAMD ST. �� r PITLOR ST SC T 3 r * O = * 5 1veGEL f. Ir / CLIX TORI 4 _I I ��d• -NEADDwT r• N„ Si, ° - )fi c'1� sw. RI _ �1 ML �ARTMDL',X 4H r. -11 [^f f )'I_` a fXSAMO• .TI—�\\ ti� 4W. �t ,°;4tiP✓." i'j i , �__.)f. WI EL."*I J ISr�i L-+ )T. SOX NEMra. )° ♦L r Wq 4� ,. CAPITAL IPmPROVEMENT- PROGRMi PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC: WORKS PROJECT WALNUT ISLAND ANCILLARY ` a DIVISION: Operations-Wastewater(212-) TRUNK SEWERS PROJECT LOCATION: West section of City ( 995 Acres) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ancillary t , Area is identified 'as currently outside City boundaries, in need of part of trunk trunk lines to facilitate fa�utrudkvlinesein thisnt and cregionew would facilitateits network in area. Placement development,:as well as minimize the possibility d high ground due to lack' of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage and high g E Probable funding sources would be through formation of -IDs, revenue bond, and as conditions of development. "- 3. �xxxxxxxxxxx�x�x�x�axxxxxx�c�cx�cx-x-xx►t**-H�c�x�cxxxx?ax�cxr��cx�cxx�cxxx�xx�xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 85186 Line D -`2000' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 90,000 r lineal foot FY 86/87 Line A -r2000'` of 8"- lines @ $45 per : $ 90,000 FY 87/88 Line C - 3000' of 8.1, lines @ $45 per lineal foot $135,000 FY 88/89 Line B - 4450' of 8" lines @ $45 per lineal foot $ 200,000 >. TOTAL: $515,000 ###�f-DE xi(-x-x'x#x-:cx-x-DE##�(-x�i-x x-x-x-x-x�(-D(-74=N Dkx x-x-lt iE'1f 34 N 8HF3E-x-x'x#x-1(-x-Ycx3HEx-x-x-DEYE x-x x-x-x#iE'x-x##it-x-x-x-xiF}t-x iE F SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLA(! OTAL FY 84-85. FY'85_86 FY 8_ 6_ _87 FY a7-88-- FY 88-89 T M x' - Federal State Cita $ $-- -- $ $ 135_=000 f $ 45.000 $ 90 000 $___ -_— $— LID $ $ $ 135,000 $ 65 000 $ 200,000_ Revenue Bond* $ $-- $v___ $ 135,000 $ 180,000__ r' $ 45 000 $ Developer _ $ --. $ $— $_______-__ $ -_ r. T O T A L S $_____ $ 90,000 $ 90,000._ 0 000 $ 135'()00 $ 2oj $ 515,000 y Or disbursed as annual expenditures from Sewer Fund �cx�tx-x-�cxxsbutic-x-�xx�c�x-tr:�=<-xxxt<xxxxt�xs�ecxacr� xttxx �x�#�xx�xx��x�txx�cxxxxxx�cxxr� �^` / . 3t LOCATION: 0 1! 5T. L sW. l t_ac E w —vrw ( L' T ATNERItfE NINIY _T - R316E �' LL P _ St3 LY sT. p ACE OT. ST." �u qyb SW. AN"ST. 8 TSI E.AA .`. ST tbC t C yE. g ¢py 17-._.:._._. SW ERROL Si. s s EEhh ^ h T dl l ST s��'-^s T. ® s W. EOMNO J'P �i� G'S 4 ST D SW FOWYER 'a Z GR(Aytt,'TL//�- gg V !// St. (Y/Oq OEY.kY K.L ' 4 4W YAPS Y ST ti I.tr o_ SVI. q f CAPITAL IMpROi` PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: LITTLE BULL MTN SANITARY SEWER DIVISION: operations-Wastewater(212) section of City 245 Acres) PROJECT LOCATION: South PROJECT DESCRIPTION: developed residential region suitable for Area is identified as 'partially continued development and infill, The uneven Pattern of development aer rea he has mitigated thagainst hazardsthe resultregions from theonnelack of tion to t sanitary City--wide septic tank Possible heal collector lines seepage. and high ground water tables. Placement of initial in area will facilitate development and minimize health hazards. Probable funding sources would be through formation of LIDS and as conditions of development. x�ctya-x-x-x-�-x•�x-x-�#�-lex-x-x-r€�#mac-�c-u-x-at#ac-x xx-x-x x-xx-x-x#x-x�c-x-xx-te x x-x-xx-x##x-x-x-x x-x x-x-xae�c-it-x-te#-x�c x-k-x-�t-x p ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: A5 er 'lineal ft $135,000 FY 85/86 N 100th/Inez - 3000, of 18' lines @45 epr lineal >foot $ 80,000 FY 86/87 Murdock St - 1775 ,of 8' ,lines @ $ P FY,87/88 S 100th/Sattler/98th - 3300' of 8" line @ $45 per $147,500 lineal 'footew - 4450' of 8" Sines @ per FY 88/89 Sattler/96th/Hoodvi $45 P $147,500 4 lineal foot TOTAL: $510,000 x-x#xl(-x•�f-x#-x-x-M�f-f$-#-►QaHt•x-x-xiE-x-x-i(##-x-x-3t-x-x-H-x-x-x-x-x-x iE�-xiHt-D£-�-x-x-�E�t-3F3t-x-x-x-x-x�•##'rE-lE x#-x M-x-x#�E3E-��-x3E#-2:�t-x . r SCHEDULE. AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL - FY 84-85 FY 85-86` FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 f Federal $ State $ $ y City__ $---- LID $----- $$ 135,000 $ 5_�,O�O- $ l47 000 ' $ LO 0 $ 385 000 Developer $_____-__ $ 30,000 $ 47 500 47 500 _ $ 125.00H $ $_ $ $ € $ -- $ $ — $_ $ 135,000 $ 80,00o $_147,50q_ $ 147,500 $ 510,000_ TOT ALS $___ i(-K-#•M-xi(-x#i.`-x-x�(-x-x-x.x.yr�t-x-x�E?�TFx-xifi�iE-x-tE x3Ex iHt-x3(a(x-x#i(-x-1l-K-xiE-x3(i4-x-x# i-. °• . NI ao) LOCATION: /// s �..---.� S.w FARNO G CR OR �� RI I a _ p11n'S R ; tlUUMT GNlEw L- LRME T Z A „•t '« 3� w w •M�-.•_•,i�l • YROES LV s.W. a NIT V:E TER ALE - �9M. Met SIT • E i� EtlLAWA w I s T U u w a ST v �c ` PS t ` ETRE T S.W PINEfa�' m n f!. 6Gr'�OR. LFIO�A ST 9 a R,J Y ('=J IUKKa• i 5T - LI 1 i OR. CT 4 <• 1 A S.M. I NT4 .t..'4 � I I S!Y. IRwuvzw � S.w °' SA TL ER ' i�� ROSS St.•i i _ 1I T, - _ a ry fw RAR E ST r� 11 I I I RAALE �J! �fyE, • oP� � 1 1 I SwV i u 4-0 / r �� aa••.VT rt �a•L 6 C� .n i , i' L 4 � • Fad a 'I ` • nS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SANITARY SEWERS LIDS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations--wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Unsewered areas in the City got connected to sanitary sewer network, but within reasonable proximity ` existing trunk lines, provide suitable .-L conditions for formation of LIDS as a means ;to achieve connection. Many of such areas identified are primarily residential in character, and often suspected of possible health hazards due to lack of sanitary sewers, septic tank seepage, and high ground water tables. i(x%x#%i(3t;F%%?E�%fitxxxdHc% %x x% %%citxi(x%%Hx�Hix3E**XiHFx�tx-x•#**X*XxiF-x-D KMx##x-x%-x-x*Xxx* ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: FY 84785 estimated LID 'projects City-wide $150,000 FY 85786 estimated LID projects City-wade $175,000 FY 86787 estimated LID projects City-wide $200,000 FY 87788 estimated LID projects City-wide $225,000 FY 38/89 estimated LID projects city-wide $250,000 TOTAL: $1,000,000 $(-%x-%x#3t-x-%•#'$tii-x3(iII�(-ii-ici'cm.3E-%x-x-%'RifiE-x-x-xitt-xitiQ-%-�-%Df-%i€-x#-:EDQiHQ D(ifiHf#i(-%-x 7Q-33�E-x-x-x3(#%-)Ex3t�t•3E•%�M-%x#4E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 38-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ State $ $— - $ $ $ $ LID $ 150,000 $_175,000 $$ 200,_000 $$ 225,000 . 1; 2S0,000 $$1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Y (J T L S $ 150,000 $ 175,000 $ 200,000 $ 225,000 $ 250,000 $1,000,000 ?¢it34-3FSFx-�•i4-%x3Fx-�x-H•►tx-lE-%3t�-x %x-x-x-x-K•)E-SF%x-x-i(-if-xiti£-x-%•x-x-x-%%x•#-x�t•%x•%K x-x-SEii-x-x#>:-H-� LOCATION: �.r PREDOMINATELY Outside UNSEWERED AREAS city Inside CitY t-E- ta DUVALL ST.1 St S. UR�i A CL A: AM rea OU ------- D-Ti -Wi 030 -0 'D:;1 58 Acr%, Hills S.. Area It ST F� T mm-LWE�W $T cDonal Area 150 4 150 Acres CT R arde Area S�w 1,20 Acres SW. C ps. TU N.C.. Little REJUNG Bull Mt-- ider-brook 245 Acres rea. Durham sland. sw.x I Area', 222 Acres/ 100 A OUR". Sw COO7, C j)�U�t�j ST J-Es VA KENT FWOL" .0.0 �A 41 r7l CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FUTURE TRUNK SEWERS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS -DIVISION: Operations—Wastewater(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Tigard Urban Planning Area PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Large areas of primarily open land within the Tigard Urban ligPlanm ng Area, identified in terms of probable drainage patterns and ,trunk ,alignments. No trunk extensions are planned in these areas under the current 5-year C.I.P. Those areas identified include: West Durham Road (260 Acres); North Bull Mtn. (860 Acres); South Bull Mtn. (950 Acres); and Lower Tualatin (710 Acres). iE:(-Mr#�E-DC#x-EEDSIEM-M#x -?t-ii#K-DExx-K-M-x-DE-DEExif-M-K-xif-YcM3F M#x-TE�-(#)f-K-iHEM�E#H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: TOTAL: SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85— FY 86-87 FY -87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State City $ $ ' $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T T A L S $ $ $ $ $ $ x-H-xaEit-?C-3t-xit-H-Hifx-Df-HiE-HiiiFk'�1c H-lt#�-M-H'H:��7 LOCATION: v � ` 73 ��,,...•=»at:.a..:..xtiti�r.��-gra.,tisz'1':•�*�a��.-�:,«�.-..s...w*. sHa•.�. x.��.c:.'�;,,a,.. ads, .;.;a � ��: x 4 �■/■ ■►�� Pty► W z �■■ • ■■■ i >t■■' NEW ■ am- MEN 5 � �� :l■L!■>� ■fit,; �� NONE Emus man No 'ILE VMS WIN Z wo ISO MRM to �r ■ INW ■ w ME .,v- a:�. t,ev.a.�,K•�r ._�� s�'=s � ,; 'sF�h.;„5 ��.,��rst t.x��,:,�r�' �� °,. �� ,.:.,., k :..-�.. -�' '• .a.},�rfi'�G+... f., § sra*.�".'rx'•Y �s. ,.., ....,� -� :�-�� -.,`' , S Y �',= "r"w"` rf -�^�•-.:s�.,:� 2r,�'� � � ,�,.. - ax �. -:Y � a-r�::4 „ ., U,y�, ,.ae �=. iw.y,- z..�- ��.-. .�'„ s :�: �,�k.�.;�'�"++,�.�rvYi ti-- .��;a' ks�.�• � � .�,�, `" :cr.'t�'^,��'srt� s t-, ...� �.. .� ...x. ..-.rfi �,�'�..rs" €'..�;�•. ..:3 r .ae -x�f..3?,Ez.gym ,�4 .r�..� -.q� ,:�.�. „ �;��5'".��, gam'' a _� �".,.e..,k- �r,-*'c:_ . �, ��; �" '; �,. �, �� , �_ �: y: _ � �� Z; t=3 3 _,e a V. PUBLIC WORKS — STORM CRAIMAGE The major drainage problem in the City of Tigard is the significant storm--water runoff throughout the area. Overbank flooding'- that occurs when storm water quantity exceeds channel capacity provides hazards to pedestrians and motorists ` alike, damages >bridge supports and street foundations, and limits efficient land use. Primary storm drainage functions of the Operations — Wastewater Division. of Public Works have been maintenance and clearing of stream channels and bridge heads as problems arise; and the installation of storm drainage improvements in selected street projects. Storm drainage improvements expected to be incurred annually in conjunction with selected street projects are included for each year of the C.I.P. In addition to these` street—related projects, the City has identified projects designed to implement the recommendations outlined in the Master Drainage Plan for the City of Tigard, by CHH M—Hill (July, '1981). These projects 'entail primarily the preservation of natural drainage in the f loodplains of Fanno Creek and its tributaries; the straightening and widening of; the 'stream channel, ` with riprap as needed; and the replacement of several bridges impeding'high stream flows. Utilizing' the Piaster Drainage Plan in conjunction with the C.I.P. , a 'better understanding of the relationship between estimated improvement costs and funding requirements can be determined. This analysis has resulted in the realization that in order' to adequately address` the storm 'drainage problems facing the City, the current rates of the Impervious Surfaces Fee structure funding the Storm Drainage Fund (SDF) would have to be doubled under current funding approaches. A rate change from 75f per residential unit to $1.50, and from 95¢; per 2500 sq.ft. for nonresidential units to $1.50, per 2500 sq.ft. would increase the ' annual Storm Drainage Fund amounts from approximately $200,000 to $400,000. Alternatively, because of growth related causes, a Systems Development Charge (SDC) can be imposed at $500 per equivalent unit. Either way a change is required to provide sufficient funds to meet the increased run—off from continued growth of the City, and conversion of open land to developed land uses. Due to the City—wide interrelationships of storm drainage problems, it is assumed for purposes of fund allocation in the current C.I.P., that all projects identified are impacted equally on a ratio of 45% SDF, and 55% Storm Drainage - SDC. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN DIVISION DE TA:%_ DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS WASTEWATER (212) YEAR 1 - In Conjunction with Selected Str=aet Projects $ 30,000 Phase I Downtown Storm brain Trunk 100,000 Phase I Preservation of Natural Drain-Fanno Crk(Sec.F3) 35,000 Stream Channelization`- Fanno Creek (Sec. F4)' 27,000 Preservation of Natural Drain-Fanno Crk'(Sec' F5) 27,000 Phase I - Stream"Channelization-Fanno Creek- (Sec.F6) 194,000 Replace Main St. Bridge 300,000 Phase I Stream Channelization-Summer Creek (Sec.S2) 15,000 Preservation of Natural brain-Summer Crk(Sec.S3) 11,000 Preservation of Natural Drain-Ash Crk'(Sec.A1') 17,000 Floodplain Studies 10,000 Culvert Replacement 30,000 YEAR 2 - In Conjunction with Selected Street Projects $ 30,000 Phase II-- Preservation of,Natural brain-Fanno Crk(Sec.F3) 34,000 Phase II'- Stream Channelization-Fanno Crk >(Sec.F6) 130,000 Phase II - Stream Channelization-Summer Creek (Sec.S2) 34,000 Floodplain Studies 10,000 Culvert Replacement 30,000 Preservation of Natural Drain-Fanno Crk(Sec.F2) 89,000 Phase I - Stream Channelization-Fanno Creek; (Sec.F7) 116,000 Preservation of Natural Drain-Fanno Crk(Sec.F8) 35,000 Preservation of Natural Drain-Summer Crk(Sec.S4) 17,000 YEAR 3 - In Conjunction with Selected Street Projects $ 30,000 Phase II - Downtown Storm Drain Trunk 40,000 Phase III- Stream Channelization-Summer Creek (Sec.S2) 15,000 Floodplain Studies 10,000 Culvert Replacement 30,000 Phase II -- Stream Channelization-Fanno Creek .(Sec.F7) 265,000 YEAR 4 - In Conjunction with Selected Street Projects $ 30,000 Phase III- Stream Channelization-Fanno Crk (Sec.F6) 65,000 Phase IV - Stream Channelization-Summer Crk (Sec.S2) 15,000 Floodplain Studies 10,000 Culvert Replacement 30,000 Phase III-Stream Channelization-Fanno Crk (Sec.F7) 115,000 Replace Grant Ave. Bridge 272,000 Replace N. Dakota St. Bridge 278,000 YEAR 5 - In Conjunction with Selected Street Projects $ 30,000 Phase V Stream Channelization-Summer Creek (Sec.S2) 15,000 Floodplain Studies 10,000 Culvert Replacement 30,000 Summer Crk/1213t Ave. Culvert Replacement 30,000 i CAPITAL IMPROV PROGRAMPLAN DIVISION DETAIL (Cont.)` k • tt�x-x-x-�-x�t-tt-x-x-x-�x-tHt�tt SCHEDULE AND FUNDING SUNs+""IARY FY 84-85_ FY 95-96 FY 8 -87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $�_ State $� $ — $ $ $ CitySDF $ 95.400_ $ 132,750 $ 123,750 $_19! 1 2 $ 550 0 � 59� 89`01030 Developer* $ 329.000 $ 230,000 $$ 115,000 $$ 115,000- $$_�____.--_ $ 255,000 grant* $ 2551000 $___-_ $ $ 275,000_ $_- -- $ 275,000 SSC-StrFets $ $ 233,750.., 63,250 $--7-27,100 DC S -Storm_Orn $ 11_ 6 600 $ 162,25 0_ $ 151 250 $_ a _ �._ T 0 T A LLS $ Z96,000 $ 525,0 0 $ 390,000 $ 815,000.. $ 115 Do $2,641,1000 No City Costs m. .. ,K; � � �-��• `\ yam�• - �z ��,��: !� � ��:�I mill �`�!! r� �f�` "`--s�w� �AINSM � MSM -N E, �s�k „� • i � - r , r� rn F^ - � ��_ � v� �• lira 1 -�� •�' L - $,�p �$' 3 - RE Now—`i'• ,/''; �.'�y r�;iG'� t "-�`.,,��`, �; E i., 1, S. 4 � �} .L'1•-�`5,Rr:.:,•...�.e:_.,..!Ff_:."--s�'SEr`r��2.-.,.-.t...x�".:r4�•+t..,��.�._x.'a x.F�:�'.'i.,.,„ia�.'-Y?;....�..«l.s'_t,.�.�Fp`”.�3i"n Y-,�.S..a�f,�a,�.-r...�„s'�-,'re,kmx_'��,i....,�...,.•f,.Y,,-h.�.,•.�3Y.,y-'[a.....,,..-,.,,...r3 vLxfi`�rm=a>g".p�s�A�.:...-.;,t.�.';.Y�.•�,e.u`�'4.�.S.s�'§.zv,,.�x•�.'"'�Y”'�`"��r'rate:xrz�r'.!_e.�ti.Y,.ti-;2r,��4�d�"-.d.t-�k.�[_:.xn-.'��-."�R 8:.4ts•a�t'r�3t.�.-,`s,.t.-.c,-�$'t�'�µ•�a'4`:�sxz:�-'.1mas�,x.k[-i...';;ms[•,y.v�tl!t' r".?-vrd'�.,yS".S:+<fa'�«'".6.�.Fx�`.;-�:'�..z.:+.r.5`#[i-t�"�+rc"..�,sr�r_,r_;t«om,�.'-•�t 5a�,--u''i's�i��sFz€-c*."Na, Ell. W11 h—Kat NV_�:c. z ...rl.t:'<.--3';-Y•,.�K'�_c''7'�f`�»-7,y_.-,x_¢vr+aru:w.^"d%2>",.=-�`4'xf.i�S�- .3;ta,...��,'.5:_� e5r '?ra t z (�v.D,•x'�,.x� .:+.?e''; AC'S ss:a��-..F x .,"rr.;:' �`g�� + �� :,.. "';'�.. a�:c�"s?i,+'-.;�"�t!. -°�..�^'.. :t af...yi s� � -,i�.z.r z�a. .,�,�sr' ..,r, 's��l'� '�" >�`sC� "�,�`_: ......................... .............. IMIR low 02, -15 I-A MR1 ........... ...... At— PgiMv ;�kq ............g Mb _ .. . i K �..: s ��1� �_ '` CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: IN CONJUNCTION WITH SELECTED DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS STREETRECONDITIONING PROJECTS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: -Storm drainage improvements are provided annually in conjunction with selected street reconditioning projects. Attention should be directed to the appropriate street project and FY described in the streets division Of the C.I.P. Plan. Most probable `unding source would be the Storm Drainage Fund (SDF), and Storm Drainage-Systems Development Charge (SDC). �. iH4-x-x-?E-x�(-�9Ex x3t-x#YE3¢x-H-1Fx-R}t DFx�t-M x#x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $$30,000 per year @ 5 yrs. $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000' �-�-x-}(-�-)E$(-Yr��•x-M-�f-x-x•3(-X#IE-x-Dfx-DSM x-)E#sfit�F#-?t-x-ltd(•#-x-3Et-xit H�€iE-eE-)4-M-M)t�x-x�##-x-'�-x-x-x-xit-x-Dt-N�E- SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89TOTAL_ Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ State � $_ $ City $ $ $__ $ - $ SDF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 67,500 SDC-storm Drn $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $$ 821500 , T 0 T A L S $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 A**-X*-X�f x Stit�(if D(?f Pf H##DE#x X X X-** LOCATION: Woo i a E: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: DOWNTOWN STORM DRAIN TRUNK LINE DEPARTMENT'. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: DOWNTOWN AREA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: F A storm drain trunk line to be constructed, connecting ,Scoffins, Commercial, Burnham, and Main Streets into a Primary;discharge at Fanno Creek. 'ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase:I - FY 84-85 $100, 00 s Phase II- FY 66-87 40,000 t v TOTAL: $140,.000 'Its#3( H M 3E'Ef DEX M'dE Yri(M I(x 9F#Sf *-K4 SCHEDULE n irici.M PE M H H ?EM#Mi(�(3E)H4)E#DHt 2{H34 H M#f��t x 3(X S 1 SCHEDULE AND'FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ $ $ 1e,00o $ $ $ 16.000 Developer $ 100,000 $_ $ $ $ $ 100,000 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ $ ' 22,000 $ $ $ 22,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 100,000 $ $ 40,000 $ $ __ $__14_0 000 k YLDO'° +Ei A. EL wrs.tJM w» 4.a ' 1 �qa`� ' / WVALL fT tL ET f LOCATION: ¢ 1 F fr. •+ �� ]d N4N CT. T � p J4NY t 1Q. ] - E ��. �� iII LT ST. f�p11T �lT. T tip /\ \I n i dya. f31.ANN 4T. E �- jr � ,# � ))} �CQ r NCI3f•Ep W,K ST i fT oma' jr 5'RCQ °v 2 S.W. tpNNi w q„] / Jw ET. Tl4T4Wf NJ f tp. // TA ST. x.ronK't � �j•-..J C,.neai sr. n6p�Ci .F L@p AYE � SW. 9,11 \+�.• 9 � �!t�yyy�:vy\�y l "\`e i,`� �. `q- p}ol .p q Pj, LN. pw 1 4dy,N 1}' N.ft.4 "'T YCLdp St. s Cr.11}t 4 Sa. � � ( �1 E7. � ./ r o •TI pP'Ar�-.,lj f ft. 04iR4 - � Sn. 1 Y � 1 �SA 4]: � /O'.VIti dl' 64 Sq lMCs000 fT. Sj :1 •0 10 - f CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 'PRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PRESERVATIONOF NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS F DRAINAGE (Sec. F3) DIVISION: ' OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: FANNO CREEK—from Bonita Rd. to 160' downstream of Hall Blvd. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initial work on this portion of Fanno Creek to include the removal of debris } " and sediment;' the 'placement of rock in and along stream channel for erosion control and bank protection; and the seeding and mulching of stream banks. _ Annual maintenance of a related nature will be required to preserve the 4 natural drainage and enhance smooth stream flow. § Most likely funding sources will be from conditions of development, as growth occurs in vicinity. ##-x-x-M-x-x-x-x-x-�itK-x�E•xiE#�(-x-?4-x-x3<-x-##-x-3(-DE-x-DFiEx-x-MEIE)f-x-H-}Ex-xx-x-x-x-xkiE-x#M#x-3E-x->E•DfM-x-x-x-)(-x-M-?i-x-x-x-x-DE•x-x r ESTIMATE OF PROSECT COST: s Preservation of natural drainage 7,100 Lf. FY 84-85 $ 35,000 34,000 FY 85-86 'TOTAL: $ 69,000 #x-x-x-x-3t-%#bEiE-x3E#x-x-iFx-1Ex-x-xFxi(-M-3E3{-#it-M#x-1(-x-x-x-,.-n-n-,rn-nE.,H€�(3f:F-xif-x3H(-iE###-x-4Q-xi4#-X#x-3Ei(-Xi(-#x-K-x-x-�lE•YHEx- : SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL F b Federal State $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Developer $ 35,000 $ 34,000 $ $ $ $ 69,000 t $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 35,000 $ 34,0Q0 $ $ $ $ 64,000 �a-?E�-x-�-x-x-x-x-xx-x�-x-�� _ -x -�-x•x�ac-x-x ��...�-1L-�at-�E�-3 ur� -x-�s�r -�-x ;" LOCATION:)p9Ts s w „_ F. p 06 ♦ exct E s I 0 \ 000, C�p0 ta. I; �0p0)OU�0p0�pOp pp0 00 s' - 1 Vv � � .� � C00000ppOpop000p0CF pOp j SATE 4 OppO 0O.,00 00 p;ippO�pppp0 p p0000� p O p i asbe ,^. _J O p p 0 0 0 0 O } or O 00 p t '^ J p0 a0 070p00 000 O �p0 i 00 p0 ei:_~ " J �ppppp00 000 O 0 _ --_ O s: O�O 0 0 w. 19A AVE U Opp000 ` z•+tt C)Q c)( p p p s w_�a�<u _E_• E-'II�_ � i_ l._, 0 a1d,00 o6op 0 11 n(AvVvvEr+ i C-1 17711 Ni. l: t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNEL.IZATION (Sec.F4) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS--WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: FANNO CREEK-from 160' downstream to Hall Blvd. to 150' " upstream of Hall Blvd. PROJECT_DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of " Fanno Creek are planned to enhance stream flow and prevent flooding. These improve- ments will include the straightening of the channel course; the deepening and widening of the stream bed, with more gentle sloping of stream banks; and the installation of 150' of riprap on either side of Hall Blvd. bridge, to protect bridge supports from resulting increased stream velocities. The Storm Drain Fund (SDF) and Storm Drainage - SDCaremost likely funding sources for this project. 1?-x-3t-DFDFxi(-x#if#R 1d-#�4-x-x-)Hf-tEiEx-Yc'K-x-xiFx-x-x-?F:x-x-HiFx#DE�t-x-x-)FK-x-x-x-x x#x-x 1(-x-H x-?Ex#-?t YrDEiFxi(-x-DF ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct grass-lined channel w.; 150' of riprap - 360 Lf. $ 27,000 TOTAL: $ 27,000 #%�fxiEx 3Fx�C 1E#xxTE3fx3(x Ex#x#)ExlE)E#�txxH..xxxxxxxxxx3x3ExxxiFxxiExx)(xxxxi(#2HFx�(xiEiExxxx1(iE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN 1 FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL t _�,Federal _ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City_ $ $ 12,150 SDF $ 12,150 $ $ $ $ $14,850 SDC-Storm Drn $ 14,U530 $ $ $ $ $ 27,000 T O T A L S $_ 27 000 $__ $ �t-x-x-x-x-x•x•x-x-x-x-x-xx-x-�t-xit-xac-x�t-x�c-x-x-x-x�t-x-�t•x-x�t-x-x-x-x x-x-� 1.LOCATION: TIGARD 9.a.9C T4. �..,c[. 9w L� �- sa- pIL ri a 000 c Leals ;j i o00o LN. a DOVALL sT 0 '�• 000 sw TANce i' r. �� cu. C- oTil O f.w. J A fL _ MfAOQN 'p O t 0 O -I' 000000 O sT. FL. P 9s V 0 JAR )0000 0 � 031 )0000 ,'yAyl.��i-� 9 res 'EW OOL � y 0000000 r o0 0 IT. Op�O 00 ` sr . c9..y s.w 0 0 O NCAN090 aer NI 0 -.41M1, SY1.ANN ST. 3 ♦�� H r� Q OO T ��S�r7 4. A O F rLT,.v 4a Sw-EA110L ST, 0 Y To .N ,,,o` �, ' �♦. rr k't O 00 00 m�yy 0 �= 1 4APMEN sT S.H. P -s TA ..I (� ,L s p o Ls s cF °00000 Si- RR DEL IIY E )$ O �C)i• OO O On O OOO Sa IRNi sT .IAN£f R6 i � l_� 4 �, A O�OC yg■.�.'..O=Ep.^��e � _ '� O �- F" N T H j� ♦` ^ LL M G !� F fl S�Lf ` coon // e�Pte' Js a o fs, sT.tffi 00 0000 i r 1*'•. ,ryv O ♦ ../, 'E f� ' $1 1 LN. t /"% ��E 0pP +..P�!� 'f P` S.E C, OLARA �O O�[IOO •s.,, // rJ �—^ n: sT. ► �' ."..'�,^. sP°i! � /�_ i n _ iYaOn. �O.un ��. 5 � CAPITAL IMPROVEMEFJT PROGRAM PLAN 1 PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE (Secy. F5) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: FANNO CREEK-150' upstream of Hall Blvd, to 1550' downstream of Main Street. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initial work on this portion of Fanno Creek to .include the removal of debris and sediment; the placement of rock in and along ;stream channel for erosioncontrol and bank protection; and the seeding and mulching of stream banks. Annual 'maintenance`of a-related nature will be required to preserve the natural drainage and enhance smooth stream flow. Most likely funding sources for this project will be the Storm Drain Fund and Storm Drainage - SDC. •x-�-H-;43Ex-x34#� iE•x-k-x-#-x-}E x#-x-x#x-:H(-x iFi4-x-x x-x#)(-x-?f#x#3ExiFx-x-x-x-DExx-x�C-If-x-x-D:x-x-x-lE-x#xit-x-x#xi(-x-x-x-x-xiFdE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: ' Preservation of natural drainage - 2,820 lf. $ 27,000 TOTAL: $ 27,000 HHMHH x x x K Fx#Df x 4f M#xiFx k#x i(x#3Ft(xiE x x3Fx#xii M x#x xEiFx x x M x x D4 xH34!(xx x H M x x3F1EDEx 3F x x#k x DEif x>£)Ei4 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 _ TOTAL _ Federal — State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF• $ 12,150 $ $ $ $ $ 12,150 SDC-Storm Drn $ 14,850 $ $ $ $ $ 14,850 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 27,000 $ $ $_ $ $ 27.000 id)(-xil-i�iQ-xx3f-x3Q-xi4iEit#•H#x#x34-D4•#-x-Df-)E#x-�YcxiHE#j43HH4iE34ii-x#x3H(it#x-M-x-x-x)E-x-x'.�-x34iHEif-�E3E-xil#x•x#x3E-x3EM x-x'k• LOCATION; -000" ' / .0000 - c • cp - . `s ii- await sr za S� 0 !i! 000 0" i EL •'a„ (1 �� 0000000 0 00 - 0 •^-r ST. \ vl ��Jl Q v C n s J0000 .. J°l7 0 7 0°0000 s F ■ °°° \ tp. +"/o + CiO� (� l�c a.•i -pb sx apn sr. y. w>^-""=— �.r._ - O Oq O +cti r J •(\+�✓ \it +s O .Ci oso » cc.N s*i O c ro a:a . -•pasty s° syr. R RJ p �'� o- vv C � � \ UgQO ` \�\. reins ro'` C � )C (`. (-)0 ^ —�. �•. 1 Ro. u aar ars _ 0 f Ol O C O AUF O s. y.nn• s� v s v ;i ,� t ,; � ♦ rA a „'''s `o syr sT.�r r 0 7° s A jr 9sw o'uAKa CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNEL (Sec F6) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERA -WAS"fEWATER(212) NO CREEK-1550' downstream of Main Street to 750' PROJECT LOCATION: FAN upstream of Grant Avenue. this portion of Fanno PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along These planned to enhance stream flow and prevent flooding. the Creek are ' p- of the channel course; improvements will incloetneestreamlbedew th more gentle sloping of banks; deepening and widening on either sides of Grant Avenue bridge and the installation of 700' oroepta bridge 'supports from increased stream and Main Street bridge to p velocities.: Storm Drainage rces would be the Storm Drainage Fund Most likely funding sou , SDCand as conditions development x yc -xit x six xx xat rH��t xac x 3Ftt ac }EM-M-K•�E3E�#H�-�f-D(-K3E�f-D4-YH43FKiF' ` ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: rass-lined channel w. 700' of riprap - 3;655 1P. $194,000 Construct 9 FY 84-05 130,000 Phase I 65;000 Phase ZZ FY 85-86 Phase III - FY 87"••88 ' TOTAL: $389;000 ` itii-x-x��f-iQiQ-xiH4-74#i#-)t-?tF M�iFYt-EQ-#-Df-�-'�-M-x#DFx-x-X�i H-x3EiE�i-M�;x H3(-)f-H-x-x�(-3E-x-H�HE3(iEx-x'wt-M-x•�t-DHt-�-3c-#�tit-x#X�d' OCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 8, 8-89 TOTAL FY 84-85_ FY _85-86 FY 86-87 FY8r 7=_88_ Federal $___-— $__ $ State $_----- $ $_ $—`-- - $ $-- CitY_- o__ 5 Q $ $ 2— $—_ $ 1 — $ 000 Developer $ 194 000 $_____--- $ 107,250 ------ $__71,500= _____— 3- � $�— $ — SDC-Store Drn T 0 T A L S $ 194,000_ $ 130,000... $,______ �- 65 000 $ 389 000 M Yc�F-�Eic-�M-1�it-1Hk#��-M•x-x-xi�-x-DF -HiQ-1F#�E�-x-X-H-HDE�-H-Mi(-�-x-#�x=st-�x-D�1Fx�rE3{x-xx-xiElFit-:cat9�-- — o p R. ��)DODO - Eq.�r sr •� O - 00011.-., rl.J ''� �� / ♦a, a w,.y f a y 0 COLO `� _ �-04 OO •�\ \ �\_1 ..'✓ c` ^ze r p o as 026,av OGS c no \ wsn s. sw. f caAT7.1 -� .<r ° t t � Fl cock �� •,.i t '9r U`/ 4� OJO �`J� � 1 f• oc E sT: O G,G�, .y 'TU f +A f� n ST i �< / v r. "'i'^� sw _ _ UOC OOOpQ \ u,•nnr T I .._ , r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROSECT DETAIL PROJECT: MAIN STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) ` PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown Main Street at Fanno Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION:' Replace bridge to eliminate major impediment to high—water flow of Fanno Creek and subsequent flooding of Main Street. Most likely funding sources for this project are the Storm Drainage Fund, - Storm Drainage ,- SDC, and a grant from Federal Bridge Replacement Fund/ODOT. ##-xii-x#-x-x-xi£-?F•x-x-x-?HE-x xiE-x#-x':EiFx-x'i4 x-3E3f-atx-x-x-x-xi(-x DE-x##x�f 1Ht-DE#-#-x-x-x-xit-x-M-x-x#-x-x-M-x-x H-x x)E-x-x##x'#•iFx x x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Replace Main Street bridge - 82' 'span length $300,000 TOTAL: $300,000 'fc-i(-x-xi4x-K3t•#-%##Ricic-x-n�#i(-�'#-x-3'c-x-:E##-xiHE-x)(�4-x#-3HE�E-D&-x-x-x#•#-x'#-x#-Yc-DE#-xiE-H-x-x#-#•l4iHE#-1EiEx#-x-x3(-x-?4-x-x-#-DE-k'#-# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 8485 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal _ $ $ $ $ $ $ - State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $--j-01250_$ $ _ $ $ $ 20,250 Grant $ 255,000 $ $ $ $ $ 255,000 SDC—Storm Orn $ 24,750 $ $ $ $ $ 24,750 T 0 T A L S $ 300,000 $ $ $ $ $ 300,000 #- x3(�(-T(-f(-3E3rrx##3ED4-xifx-xiczr#-is-i.xiEl4dfx#x-x-iFic-ic=n-x x x-iEil-x#-M-x-x-?Fx-iC-x-3'r�t-x-H-YEx-1E#-�##iFx-Y.x-x�'c)Ex�S-1�Ex-x-x34�K Y(x'4E s "fez. LOCATION: a r �avns 'r05 V I IKgW EL �l /111 MEADOW 5T. PL �� `` i I'C.A!J.. ♦ }1 Z K/T1H AT� ,+ iW, -fit °0 .(F@` �_i Sd SW lT 'Si R ` T � p D - s AC 's SO }K,r zr. s Tk ry aW. ¢ s� asEmese S/.RKY ST. rq rI T sTU � ST. W R°KHEK � i� =��NT �61, � a �? \C i I •A•.19'/T1 IT 9,A Ti / .;� / SN. WKS ST. n R 1V/ 6 0T. T O rL $ I SW • 4R *PA. .r e@' TAT . ' / p % COOK LK. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHRNNELI"LATION (Sec.S2) DEPARTMENT� PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Summer Creek — 1490' downstream of 121st Avenue to 280' : upstream of 121st Avenue: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of Summer Creek are -planned to enhance stream flow 'and prevent floodi�gas�_lined, improvements will include the construction of a g trapazoidal--shaped channel wino rotectWthe stream bed atdlowlopes Of volumes, istalso A riprapped trickle channel, P proposed. sources include the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage — '.SDC Probable funding and as conditions of development. �if-�.x-x-�i-YE-x�-3E�-��-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-1Ex 34-'i3E-x-x-x-x-x-3Ex-x-x-x-x-tHt-x-x-DFx-x�C-x-x-x#-xx-x-x-x-x-xx-x-xat-xx-3Fx-x-x-x-x-)Ex-x-x-x-x-x-M-x x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: — 1800 If- Construct grass—lined channel W. 150' of riprap $ 15,000 Phase I — FY 84-85 34,000 Phase II — FY 85-86 15,000 Phase III FY 86-87 15,000 Phase IV — FY 87-88 15,000 Phase V — FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 94,000 -H#x-Tf-x-x-x-x-x xiFx-x�HF-x-x Ti H-x�-)E-xx-�t-x-)d-DE-)Fx-;i x-)Exa(-x�DE#x-)i�f-Di-x#x#�lEi�-x-xi(-x-x-x�Ex-x#x x-x' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 8 FY 84-85^ FY`85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 ^ 8-__84 TOTAL — Federal $ --— _— State $ $ $ 33,750 City $ _ SDF $ 6 750 _$ $ 6 750 �$0 $ 6,750 $$ 19,000 Developer $__ $ 19—000 $ SDC—Storm Drn $ 8 250 $ 8 250 $ 8,250 $ 8 250 $ 8,250 $$ 41,250 T 0 T A L S $ 15,000 $ 34,000 $ 15,000 $ 15 000 $ 15 000 $ 94,000 xxiExxx�ExxxMx3Ex3(xxaixxxi(xxit# xxxx�ExxxiE##�ExxiFx 3(iHfx#x x xi(k lfx"1Ex x x)d 3E x M x x x'CiFx x x#?cx)F�t�Ei4 n � /`s ✓ ST. _J L ° Lt LOCATION:o CNOLLz' moo°�o°oL a 3 — 1 � ° 00000 ° 00000 000 000 �J '0 0 0Oa 000 o0ooc0 0000 0 00` o lxw I[ °00000000 000 0 0000 000 0( DO 0 0 00 OO( l 6 OO s.w_ �O s. � 000 ,TE s,s- 0000 6 000 �� t ,yANi NlTA °°°�� 3 >•^ 0000 gW, nowt oAN�1_--._sr. c sr. OCO O O O.T.NANOTA GO O0 00000°000 00 0 OO .,uuaEA n S ON. a 00 O O TIGAP0 O 0C Lrp15 F S'A LO $ § rC I 0 00 0 R a d al 0000 . E ' LNsw CANOE »a ai O mI O°0 mEaaWaN '¢ A ak. _ FA c I Imo. O ° ___ 0000 °J sr wig a ,z. s ° ^ 000 X0000 - rp .,p A. i -g , IpANY 0 E. o 000 o ► ° s pAN3E LL &<^ sw T s0000 � 0 e��,• O `4 C sr. y O Ar.0 00 ~ (1LS� Q SM.ANN ST. H h CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PRESERVATIONOf' NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE (Sec. S3) DIVISION: OPERATIONS--WASTEWATER(212) --2801 upstream of 121st Avenue to Summer Lake PROJECT LOCATION: Summer Creek outfall. PROJECT DESCRIPPION: Ind sedwork on this portion iment the placement off rock lin andealonglnclude stream the removal of debris and s ntrol and bank protection; and the seeding and mulching channel for erosion co drainage terranda Nance smoothtstreamuflow. 111 be required to of stream banks. Annual preserve the natural drat g Probable funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund ' (SDF) and Storm Drainage - SDC. X# x X X#x#'#�("Xiff X x x DE#x#x x#x XiFx D(M x x x##'iE#x)E x X jHf X X�(Dt x'jE 3(x X>E X#X ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Preservation of natural drainage - 1440 if. $ 11,000 TOTAL: $ 11,000 it#xt#-D4##)f-M M-x�f-#'3f-x-xit-X'�(-Dt-x-x-x-x-x'�(-x k-x-xit-x-x-x-x-X'i(-x�-x•X#)E�E it-xit-x-X-X-X#x-x-x-x-x-x-)E'x-x#x-x-x-x#x-lE#-X-x�f'x#X'it-x 'SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY_ 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Z . Federal State $ City $------ $___ —• 4,95 SDF $ 4 950 $ _____ $ $ $�— $ --------- $� $__- $ 6,150 SDC—Storm Drn $ 6 150 __ $ $ 11,000 T O T, A—LS $ 11,-000OAK xDQXXx'ifxx�Y xxx'i�cxx"xXXx➢Ex}HQFExXx\KxK#xxX�E r .aw L sr O °O JGO Q�°O O °00 0R o LOCATION„ cwo00o o 00 0 000 0000, o 00000 o 10-11' O0000OOC n GO _ �z w �•� y� K sl t, s:wART. s "r OC 0°O 0 0000<0 0o+0lT (1L soowAM V �` s STS s0O 0 v 00° 000 0000 O 00000 0sr 0000 O pOATM AKGTA t;4 °O 0 p 00 OCOO C)�° _ HEaa n 0000 0 00) �C'Op0 sur«EN' s �. OO 00 Ou0°�OOrJ O° s'�_ s.r. TIA ac Qp (�—_- Qp0 w IEwIS e..aa. t i! ° Se" 0000 Lnsw TAwcc sw - ' 00 0"0D700O000O000 x)Q o�au laT. - -. )0000O 0O 0 -aTr -� 00*N 0 rrOa aw p,c,oA" 4�}rT s ° 01 .4s, E 0 0 : pCT .. T f-� � -' A ym, zr.Arm sr. s eAs.Mll „ yr OQ 00 ' 3es rr ! 1 ® ttw y. zn i n i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS' DRAINAGE (Sec. Al) DIVISION': OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Ash Creek - Mouth to Highway 217. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work on this portion of Ash Creek to include the removal- of debris and sediment; the placement' of rock in and along stream channel for - erosion control and bank , protection;; and the seeding and mulching of -stream' banks. Annual` maintenance' of a' related nature will be required to preserve- the natural drainage and enhance, smooth stream flow. Probable funding sources would' be the Storm Drainage Fund' (SDF-) and Storm Drainage SDC. �t-)E-x-x-Yrx-x H x�E#H-x-M##Q-x-x-x-3Fx:x-x-xiE•x-}t�xiE-xic-)t�c�E-x x-�x-x�(-x-DE•;t-x-x-xaE-x-x#if-x-x-x-x-�#-x-x Dfx-X-lt-x-D(-x-x DFx-x-x aE ESTIMATE OF OF PROJECT'COST: Preservation ofnatural drainage 2460 If. $ 17,000 TOTAL: $ 17,000 �iEN-1{##-EED(-Dt-Dt-9E•x�FPt-x-x#x-)E xi:•H-x#x-3E#3Ex•x-M-x-x•�Y-x x�FiE-M-x-x-x-DDE-xx-?FF➢("n-i�irn-x-x-}E#x-YF-x-xi(-xx###X-x-N.-�x=mc xiEx•x-x-x-x-� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-84 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $_ $ $ City $ $ $.-_ $ $ $-- SOF _SOF $ 7,650 $ $ $ $ $ 7,650 SDC-Storm Drn $ 5,350 $ $ $ _ $ $ 9,350 T 0 T A L S $_ 17,000 $ $ $ $ $ 17,000 f **X #X x x x 7(-x-x-x-x-x#DH4-DE OCAT"I'�qO`ecN•i cnoLLs i p,*M/sq ` ✓ 0. OF�rt 00 Q Oi CQ °°0 ° 0 j0 000 0000 00000 00 0 00- 000000000 0 000 on 803 O 0000 OAZ o 00 000c ocrLE ✓°° 0 0 0000 LONGS D '`I l• t•YITs 0000 0 000 00000 O f GO �1 s 000 0 (�_-� O .c.„ a s': nc,+rw o��o,'� 0000 Sw noni G�+o st L_- J .�$___._._ F1(, )"0 U sGY.Ea �. s onoOo I N' °0 0 \ R ,�. ac Tr s. �! 0000 nf 1. 0000 °OO dr fa. M L J EY LIpGEC „ E \\a t YEI100Y ` d s FALL oa O ^� 000000 0 ! _ .. >0000 o $T�` o i ss}•y�rH•a�Yc 0 w ,��. '° 000 j )0000 - .) Jy ��' wssir 0000'J V;—'J0U �� rG' �'•\ Fq sst LT x 00000 s tT — 0 00 � sea EISEN R; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FLOODPLAIN STUDIES DEPARTMENT; PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Existing Storm Drainage System Inventory & eme eplacement Program Recommended Storm Drainage Structure R Recommended Storm Drainage Trunk System & Map RedRock Creek Mouth to I•-5 Ball Creek - Mouth to I-5 Unnamed Tributary of Fanno Creek - Mouth (1000' downstream of Tiedeman Ave.)' s to 115th Avenue Unnamed Tributary of Fanno Creek - Mouth _(80Q' downstream of Main St.) to Hillview Street •M-R-xiE�-x-x-M x-�-x-H-x#3FH-M-If iE-xitxi(-�i#�#-�#DE•x�t-x-M#�t-x'x-x-x#x-�-}S-tFx-DFS-u-x-x�E�134-x-x-x-x-x-iHE•lEi(34•)EDE M-M-x-tt-x#x-K-x-x-D�•x-)t ' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $10,00O allocated annually for 5 years $ 50,000 TOTAL: $ 50,000 }Hi-H-��t-n-3E#M#DC#M-YHt#xM#)E�%Elf#x-TEiE�i-DE-iE-M-3E'xE)HEx•H-S�-x-x-x#3(-DF3H(#iExi(#3EX-x-x-H H-D:#iE#K-x1E'�i4'x'�E#3E:t#M#M-?f�F-fFM• SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ City SDF $ a,500 $ 4,5,Q0 $_ 4,500 $ a,500 $ 4,500 $ 22,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ 5,500 $ 5,500 $ —$ 5,500 $$ 5,500 $$ 51500 $$ 27,500 $ $ $ $ T O T A L S $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 -t!#iE#lEx#i[-�',E#lf1E#M-x-x-DE�Z�;-x-3ExiF)t-Y#lf�(�M-x-x•x-x-Hid-:HHti�-H-1€#x3#-�f-)EX-x#•ss-lE-xiE-M°E#-x#x:4-Yc3EM'k�d-M-3(-}fM3E�E-Df�r•�x3E LOCATION: t. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN - PROJECT DETAIL t PROJECT: CULVERT REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An annual replacement of undersized, inadequate, or s defective culverts and other _drainage equipmentis provided, in conjunction with a "continual updating of the City's Hydraulic Structures Inventory' (CH2M-Hill Master Drainage Study), under the Recommended Storm Drainage Structure' Replacement Program. •H-u-H••x-?Fx-H-#M-x-x-3E-x-x-x-x-�-tt-Dt#��(-x-x-x-kit-sF7FD�x-�x-x-x-x-x-Mihx-x•M-x-x-x-I#-2FtE-x i4-x-x�E-x•x-x�F3f-xaEit-M-DF#•#DE-M-)E#•x-x-x-x-x-M-k-tc•x-)t ESTIMATE OF PROJECT 'COST: Approximately $30,000 allocated annually for 5 years $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 -1�•x-�',t-:t:(-x-K-x-3t?t-xiE•)t•Xit-DE�Ex-x-M-Yc-x-x-x-X#x-xit-Dd-Yc-DEM-k-M-D(�E3t-x�x-Dt-Dt-)Ex-x-x-Pf-M•xi(-)t-x-x-xit-x-3S-k-K-�•x-M Di k SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PIAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $• $ $__ $ $ $ SDF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $13,500 $_ 13,500 $ 13,500. $ 67,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $__ 16,500 $ 16,500 $_ 16,500 $ 82,500 T 0 T A L S $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000.,. $ 30,000, $ 30,000 $ 150,000- �I#3t3f4•#-1t-x�t3t'J(•�(-At-x•�t--�k-x-x�t-Ptii-;EYt-x-Dt-)E#'A-�••H•jE M-7Eit-x H-x•�E-'rf-x##tFif-M3fit3t-tE if-Mit-x-x-Yrxat-x-x-x-M-x-x-M�-xvt-xi�f-Jtx-x-x-k-x H x-3t• LOCATION P CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FUTURE STORM DRAINAGE PROJECTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide f PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Projects identified, but not budgeted for current 5-year CIP Plan: preservation of natural drainage - Fanno Creek', mouth to So. Pacific : RR; 'preservation of natural drainage Ash Creek, Highway 217 to Oak Street, and Oak Street to Hemlock Street; replacement of bridges - Hall Blvd. bridge, Tiedeman Avenue 'bridge, and Tigard Street bridge. i •hExif•x-xx-x�ti(-x-f(if-x YF x-?t-M-x-x-xiE-M-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-H#-x-x�F�x-x-x-3EDE x-K x#x-3t-x-14-x-�-Ycx-7E-xif�tE•X-D(••YrM#x-x#-x-,ricn-x-�x�Fx-x-x-x-x � i P _ ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: f i r: TOTAL: $ X4"x-x-xx-x'k***-x�tx�t'4Df�fxD4;cxx#xxx3tXxtitxxxxxlxx�Ax�Yxxxxxifxxxx�Ex#xxxx#xxx#xx#-X-X-x-x-xx-x-x-x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-55 -FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $City $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $— $ $ . $ $ $ $ $ $ `Y $�•� �- K T O T A L S $ $ $ $ $ $ •�x-��t�•�-x-x-x-��x-x-x-x-x��-xxx-x-��--xx xxx-x�x-x-x-x�-s�-x-r�•x-x-x�x-x-x-�x-sf•�cae xxac-x�c-xx�-u-x-x-xx-x-xx xx-x� LOCATION: a << z; . -F' �;._ �i 5. �� }'... f t • CAPITAL IHPRO'JEi'��1T PROGRAMPLAN DETAIL ' ECTED DEPARTMEN_T � PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: IN CONJUNCTION WININGEPROJECTS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) 3, STREET RECONDITIO t PROJECT LOCATION: 'City-wide i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: provided annually in conjunction with selected Storm drainage improvements are p Attention should be directed to the treat reconditioning projects. and FY described in the streets division of the s appropriate street project ; C.I.P. Plan. source would be the Storm Drainage Fund (SDF), and Storm Most probable funding SDC) . xxxk Drainage-Systems Development _Charge #�Yt-1t'd�Q-x-1t�('#-x-)Ex-xiFx�E'.�#-x�Fx-tE-x-iE-x-x-ltiEx�c-x-lt-x Pt-k-x-x-DEk'�Ex-H-x-k-x-x#�3Ek-lE#k-x#-x-x-M�t-x xk'#-�"x'�-mak ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $150,000 '.Approximately $30,000 per year @ 5yrs. TOTAL: $150,000#-k-x-x-x-x�t-kDFx-x#-x-x-lFtc-x-x-xi SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 86-87 FY 8_ 7-88 F_Y 88-89 FY 84-85 FY 8�_ --- $_ -_-_ $---- Federal $_ $--- $---- $�- — $ $ter state $-------- $- $_------ $ _ $ $ $ 67 500 C i tv $------- $ 1 $ 1 0 $ 13 05 0 $0 sD _ _ $ 1 = $- 1 0 $ SDC-Storm Drn $ 1� $ 16 500- $ 16,500 $ 16 500 $ 16 500 $$--y-- _ $ $ $ T O ( A L S $ 30,000- $ 30,000 $ 30.000 $ 30 000_ $ 30,000_ $ 1509000 x-,`(it-}('R-�iif-A:#-DS•ii'•Ht-#�taE-xit-#-k###�4#-k-Df-k-4{-x#-##it-x-iE-x#-xi4-x3E##-2i l(it-dQ-k###k#3E-3(-M-YFx�H(-x�'#3fi(-iH(-x�#'k-k-Y-YHC M X* LOCATION: a r CAPITAL IMpROVEMEUT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE (Sec. F3) DIVISION: OPERATIONS—WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: FANNO CREEK—from Bonita Rd. to 160' downstream of Nall Blvd. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ` to include the removal of debris Initial work on this portion of Fanno Creek and sediment; the placement of rock in and _along 'stream channel for erosion control and bank protection; and the seeding and mulching of stream banks. Annual maintenance of a related nature will be required to preserve the natural drainage and enhance smooth stream flow. ' Most likely funding sources will be from conditions of development, as growth occurs in vicinity. #kkk##HkkkHHkifklt-HHHH1(�4kHkHkYMIEH#H#kkk#kHkkYEkHkkk=kkk#kkkD4HiiH#HDEk####kitk?FklE#kk HHk F ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4i Preservation of natural drainage - 7,100 Lf. k: $ 35,000 FY 84-85 34;000 FY 85-86 i 'TOTAL: $ 69,000 DE##k-k-H-k_yEHif-H:.c;�ic-H-�k#H#H H-H ii-DH(k�;i-H-k-k-#k-k-k-H-k-li-#-HiE#-?f#3(-k-k-##H-k#Hit k�i-k-H3t-#k-kiEfFk-)t-k-kifk-3Fk-k-k-k-DF#'k' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 , FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL k Federal $ $ $ $ $ $$ State $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $— t Developer $ 35,000 $ 34,000 $_ $ $ $ 69,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $_ 35,000 $ 34,000 $ $ $-- $ 69,000 k Nqo-a krms 3i4 1 o LOCATION v °0OOOOo 0 °O �� 000p0°0000X00v 0° 000 00000p000 00'000000000 0 00° 00p0 °racO`f \ s t tti ..r O 000000 u Zit-y L-� J00 U 00000 000 u�O °O ,•: O O°p i. Ne—a.a•'d[ M : J0 00 s $ 00p0000° OO ..... _ .Air 10, A� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNEI_IZATION (Sec. F6) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-wWASTEWATER(212)'; PROJECT 'LOCATION: FANNO CREEK-1550' downstream of Main Street to 750' upstream of Grant Avenue. PROJECT 'DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of hese Creek arse planned to enhance stream flow and prevent ' flooding. These improvements will include the straightening of the channel course; the deepening and widening of the stream bed with more gentle loping of 'banks•, and the installation of -700' of riprap on either sides of Grant Avenue bridge and Main Street bridge to ,protect bridge supports from increased stream velocities, Most likely funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDC and as conditions of development. x"xxxxItx#DEHDE#xx3fxxx)FxiE3(x xxYE3fx1HExx"##xxxxxxx�(x3(#?Exi(x"xxxxK-xx - ##x-?E#"x K-xiFxxxxx#�(#x�E ESTIMATE OF PROJECT.COST: : Construct grass-lined channel w. 700' of riprap -- 3,655 lf• $194,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 130,000' Phase II - FY 85-86 65,000 Phase III - FY 87-88 TOTAL: $389,000 �E-xiE-K-K�(-xif-k-#-xit"x-1Eii-1fit3(-K-DtiE-xid-xit"K-DE-K-K-3(-x-x-K"3E-K-x"3f-x"x�Q-x-K"x�(#-x-x-x-DE�f-K-i(-x-K#3(-x-x"�(-x-x-x-3((-K"x-�K"xif-K"K'rHt x#K-x xiE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 64-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $— $— $ $ State $ $ $— $ $--- City -City $ $ $ $ $! $ SDF $ $ 58,500 $•_ $ 29,250 $ $ 87,750 Developer $ 194,000 $ $ $ $ - $ 194.000 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ 71,500 $ $ 35,750 $$ $$ - 107,250 T 0 T A L S $ 194,000 $ 130,000 $_ $_ 65,000 $ _ $ 389,000 YFDf iE 8E K)(it Yci(K 2t x�$iF�K x K x K x�(M x x xiEfFYE K X K x-x-"-x x3Fx-x-K x-x-x-1£-x"*x-x"x K*-*x-x##x"#i(DFii x xiE)f"K K LOCATION: i ,0000 lr� �{ �O > �� _`�. 000•. s \ . s. ��a a ,1 `�C jqu �, 0000 v O r O as s' `� n cL C ^tea � t ✓ �•-r 1 U,:� )0000 no 0 ' —JOOC � `•, ._ Fn} s.roggte � � J �qi k•'h,P`'eL� � 9 �Ci ♦ S Ci )UG r fj 0 ,• �\a. , L= _ S � i A n Lr • t �/r .r i% r — _ _— l.C( �3C�Cly \\ a. I.. r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNFLILATION (Sec.S2) PUBLIC WORKS DIVISIMON: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT `LOCATION: Summer Creek 1490' downstream of 121st Avenue to 280' upstream of 121st Avenue. PROTECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel -improvements along this portion of Summer Creek are planned to enhance r stream flow and prevent flooding. ` The, the construction of a grass-lined, improvements will include trapazoidal-shaped channel with a 15' wide bottom and side slopes Of 2 to 1. A riprapped trickle channel, to protect the stream bed at low volumes, is also proposed. Probable funding sources include the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDC and as 'conditions of development. x-x�t-xx#x-xx-x#x x xat-x-x-r�x-xx x-x x��t-x-pe��c��-x�c-��t-x��c#x-x-�-u x-►�x#-x-�� ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: _ 1800 lf- Construct grass-lined channel w. 150` of riprap $ 15,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 34,000 Phase II FY 85-86 15,000 Phase III FY 86-87 15,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 15,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 TOTAL'. $ 94,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal _ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $— $ $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 33,750 SDF $ 6,750 $ 6 750 $ $ $ 19,000 Developer $ $__191000 $ $ SDC-Storm Drn $ 8,_L50 $ 8,250... $ 8 250 $ 8 $ 8,250 $ ,'L50 $$ 41,250 $ $ 000 $ 15,000. $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 94,00 TOT A L S $ 15,000 $ 340 x k x iE�Q DFx#x AFH x x xiHFx x#`!Ex#LwlE#iE�E#�E x#x x x)of!Ex°i�(3cO#x DExM#xi_t n x R j`s ST 0 — 0oLOCATION s 0 Oo 0000 . 0� ° J0 000 0000000 000°0°0 °° °o° s. �. 0 000 O000 P }s � i E�+< 0000000000 000 0 0000 . ftc�racatP' - 1 °� �O °0 ° " r O 00 OOOt � 0 00 se. 0v s 4 00 °OO O .� 000 �or+as*.tt _ s•[ s 0000 O 000 In & c 00000 O Z' I •. 0000 S. h°AT l�K1- -ST)"00 . til ° O O DOn�p0 -/jq O - .NEuya - 00 OT) - iS OS SuruE.n R S OR. ^ v °OO 00 < £ pUO°'00°O, O°0 sr. y ► s.r. T1.... x n S.f. UUU o O°n °°° IE MIS i� o°° n 0 :i! °oc°�o `5w wcdt .a E 2� 6„yea O •`-I O iT rCwaae "met 4 El "'tee. " Im. ° ° •° 0000 Din. ST. Li-�\ M o•1 ° )00 00 )00 00 0000 -DOO LL0000000 N A S...fM ST. =n 11 "� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FLOODPLAIN STUDIES DEPARTMENT: PUBL-IC WORKS DIVISION' OPERATIONS—WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Existing, Storm Drainage System Inventory & Map Recommended Storm Drainage; Structure Replacement Program Recommended Storm Drainage Trunk System & Map Red Rock.Creek — Mouth to 1-5 Bali Creek — Mouth to I-5 Unnamed Tributary of Fanno Creek Mouth (1000' downstream of Tiedeman Ave.) to 115th Avenue Unnamed, Tributary of Fanno Creek - Mouth (goo' downstream of Main St.) to Hillview` Street t�a�X�a#Xitt�-Xx-X#x-x#�X#x-t�#�t#x-x�t#X-x-�t-x�t�t-XX-x-x-xX�c-x-x-v--x-X�t�t-X-x#X-X�t#kX-x-xX-X-x x-X-x-x-u-x-X#X-X� ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $10,000 allocated annually for 5 years $ 50,000 TOTAL: $ 50,000 ,lf-Dt#?t-y;�t-X#x--int x-xiExit-ihY#X-X-Dk?{#?(x3Ht-X-S�XX-X-X x#X x-x#x-x-lt3Ht�t#X-X x-fE x#X#X-X-X-X-x-aEit#x-X-X3t-Ncx3{-X-x-YcX-x-X-X�t-x-X-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85--86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-85 TOTAL Federal $ __ $ $ $ $ $ State $` $ $— $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF -- $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4.500 $ 4,500 $ 22.,500 SDC—Storm Drn $ 5,500 _$ 5,500 $$ 5,500 $$ 5,500 $$5,500 $ 27,500 $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 1.0 OoO— $ 10.000 $ 50,000 i #3#?t'eHt x3t3Q#id x#rt x31'JtiE## Xif x X#�t3tit X'R X X X-X-X x#H 7t if X X x#X x X X#x X#X 3i i(#'A Xit 34 X Xit X X K Pt x x�l 1(#X3Eit X x KX LOCATION! n 111mg 1111 p-11,1141,1 I MERGE= ffimmoffamn CAPITAL TmPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: CULVERT REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An 'annual replacement of undersized, inadequate, or defectiveculverts and other drainage equipment is provided, in conjunction with a continual updating of the City's Hydraulic Structures Inventory - (CH2M-Hill Master Drainage Study), under the Recommended Storm Drainage St ructure 'Replacement Program. ##x#H-x'A-x#DFx#s6iQ-id-?:#x-x�E#ic-�3tiFAH4#x-i{-x-x-'�##Dt-Dti(-M x-x-x-x-TF-�-DE x-jE-x x-x-x-k-3E x-��-lE-x-it-x-ff xiE#x-x#?f-Dc-x-x-Dt-x-'k-x-x-x-3t ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $30,000 allocated annually for 5 years $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 #�#H#k��#Df�F3F3tit-DHE-D4-1£-x#:t-31-x-3E-x-?4#iF)(#)Ht#x-x-)d-x-1f1E x#x-H#x-x-HH#H-DEM�iE3Ex-DQ-D(#x#S{-�3`cxiF#�t-�•3fx'k9i-`.E###xiE# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN . FY 84=85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-99 TOTAL Federal $ $. $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $— $• SDF $ 13�500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13.500 $ 67,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ 16,500 $ 161,500 $$ 16,500 $$ 16,500 $$Y 16,500 $$ 82,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $_30,000 $ 30 000 $_30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 }�#-�-x�t-#iE�-YrH•;t-iHi-%-➢(-9t-le:cif-9(-DE#-M-x-x-BF##i'(-x3t#3c3t-x3Ex-x•ii iE-x-x-x-x-iEK-x-M-x-x-THE-x-x3t 3tit-'fi-H3E-3?-x-YH(-x-1(�E-M-xiExi6-��t#Tc xii-3t LOCATION: { A t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL, -- PROJECT: PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ' DRAINAGE (Sec. F2) DIVISION: OPERATIONS—WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Fanno Creek - So. Pacific RR to Bonita Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work on this portion of Fanno Creek to include the removal of debris and sediment; the placement of rock in and along ,'stream channel for erosion control and 'bank protection; and the seeding and mulching of '.stream yanks. Annual maintenance of a 'related nature will be required to preserve .the natural drainage and enhance smooth stream flow. Probablefundingsources 'would be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDC and as conditions of development. ; ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Preservation of natural drainage — 9,174 If. $ 89,000 TOTAL.: $ 89,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ State $ City SDF $ $ 20,250 $ $ $ $ 20,250 Developer $ $ 44,000 $ $ $ $ 44,000 SDC—Storm Drn $ $ 24,750 $ $_ $ $ 24,750 T 0 T A L S $ $ 89,000 $ $ $ _ $ 89,000 iFx-x#-xx-Ycx-x-)fx-3Ex-x#-x-�x,.x-�x-xlExi(#M-?ED&-`x,-x-x#�-x-x-x�Q-x-x-x-H-x-x-iE#-x-x-H-x-H-xi4-tax#x-3E#�!E-?EiEif-x-xx-TE#-x�Ht#xiE-'.((-x-)c-x_3F - `�"fec,,,d LOCATION• " Too 000 OOG 0000 00000 rr r.—r 00000000000000000000000IE .w ! OO 000000000000 ~ r 000 000 00p000 -- vc. ,., L .,oww•` gN�:, .,0 1 ' )DOOt 00®+ 0O 0p 00 �O 00 ' I L eaw,tT J,�p0C,0 0`)0000 0000_ 0000 O00U JOU O O O 0 OQO J 0000 000 O U 000 .q ,)n A.�r�U00O0000 �0J000 _a 00 oOC F1 __ .. __. _ s.. "'° v ��0000 0 00� Or S A r -- '-' . 0'✓ rf �0000U 000c)nri `Cy bb _ _ v i pg.�. OC�,< JU )'` C) 00 )O � •JS iUC� I" � .'• s , t � 1 ' a � PIN H CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA" PLA9_ _ PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNELIZATION (Sec. F7) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Fanno Creek 750' upstream of Grant- Avenue to 100' upstream of Norah Dakota Street. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of Fanno Creek are planned to enhance stream flow and prevent flooding. These improvements will include- the straightening of the channel course;' the deepening and widening of the stream bed, with more gentle sloping of banks; and the installation of 450' of riprap on either sides of Tiedeman ,Avenue Bridge, Tigard Street Bridge, and North Dakota Street Bridge, to protect bridge supports from increased stream flows. Most probable funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDC and as conditions of development: ####�-l(#�-zrn-zT-,z-a-X-XifX-X3(-iE-X�(�E"X-X#-X-X-X-X##�(#-X�S-X�Q�E-DE 2f-X-X-x##-DE#•#X#-lE X-X-X-X�-Xi(-X X-X KiE•#-X-X-bt#�-X###-1(-X-X X X• ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct grass-lined channel w. '450' of riprap - 5,820 If. $116,000 Phase I FY 85-86 265,000 Phase II FY 86-87 115,000 Phase III FY 87-88 496,000 TOTAL: $ SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN ✓ FY 84--85 FY 85-8 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ State $ $ $ $ city67,500 $_— $ $ 67,500 SDF $ —$- $ Developer $ _ $_116,000 $ 115,000 $• 315,000 $_ __-- � 346,000 82,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ $__ $ 82,500 $ $ T O T A L S $ $ 116,000.. $ 265,000 vim$ 115,000 L$ V $ 496,000 OAK#XXX1EifiXI nT nX�E1 I z fc,a#X#XXlrX3f�QX'#XYrITnnXiHf' xT(zrf.Q lrza#XXX� /z. X X�< ST a (�w� LOCATION: GkOLLS �°o° o°o� s, 5- ° 000 o / 0 L_J� o 0 0 00000 s�o 00 ,�L o 000 000 0O°Mo0 G000 °Q A 2 g-g 0000000000 000 ry0 OOOG ilAIC DO 0 tl ` ° 00 00 000(A s 000° sr O t•� ( u .I I oO O O J GOO LOkO(wo TA" T) sw 0000 0 { STEv 000 .ka•kITA �� 00000 O i s 0000 kURT DAI�i---_St- kt:w sT :. 0O r r.-•---T -Tr z,T O O f' kOk Tk DAkOTA O ,000. °0 0°00000 S- 000 00 _ ,rtaMA YY OO OC) N a i C.� )0 p 0 zuw«En P S w OO O o < OO OOprJ O p0 fT. z.�. narARD EWIS 0°O n O ' � ° O + . Lksn TSkGE GOE sa E a .� w 1 flPL Oj0000 S)TSSA 1M ° a 000 ^wtteT ,`-, OOOO:......DOO esTUE LL v r w g '" se LT. s. -0000000 O A CJ$ O a ST; O kLkUC P,A• s� .n a. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT:- PRESERVATION OF NATURAL, DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE (Sec. F8) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Fanno Creek - 110' upstream of North Dakota Street to Scholls Ferry Road.. .,F PROJECT DESCRIPTION Initial work on this portion of Fanno Creek to include the removal of debris and sediment; the placement of rock in and"along" stream channel for erosion control and bank protection; and the seeding and mulching of stream banks. Annual- maintenance of .a related nature will be required to preserve the 'natural drainage and enhance smooth stream flow; Most probable funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund and Storm Drainage - SDC, ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: ; Preservation of natural drainage - 4,470 if. $ 35,000 TOTAL: - $ 35,000 #-x iF-x-H-H H-iEi4-x-14-%H�E-xiE-x-H-#-M-H-H-#-H-x H#-H-X•#-x-x-?E#-H-H•M-x x-x-x-H-x-H-x-iHE-DE#�E-x-x-x�E-1Fx-x x-##-)(-H3HE-#-N-H#-x•x•x-x##-Dt x x-x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86--87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal State City $-- SDF $ $ 15,750 $ $ $ v $ 15,750 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ 19,250 $_ _. $ $ $ 19,250 T 0 T A L S $ $ 35,000 $_ _ $ $ __ $ 35,000 #itxx#Hxxxx?E?t##xxD()E34xMx�txDEx)Fxtixx V 3(x #- x-x-H-#3(Y Hxx)fHxxx3ExHi4#xD!x?HFHH......#HxxxxHiE o.R LOCA t --_' `� 006 o � E C0000 000000 000 (^^^ OO0 000000000 wr OUO .. 00< F$j000( O 0000 Oa 6E-"11 '- j C DO ")OQ�L.Yc A11D 00 ro 00 00<A000,000 ov s X00 O O •.-i 000 onosrArr STLY _ b,�Z,N�rA 0000 O f�Cf� 000 Iwn s .000 ` N a, 0 a 00000 O 1 00 (j R (^.�^\' sr 0000 J V'v 0 \ zr.-� NOn IN o.Mor1 _ sw M RT j0 OOO 0Q 00p00 - CtA00 rL s"•J r--- 00 O O 0 0 ��C�O 0 suNNEN� n rrta F s on = • 000 OOC) p�pO�O�p00 sr. �` s 000 00 'C(Q,�� f O 4 \ 1 1 Q QQ Q n QQQ \i C Q Sw 0000 1.. NGDOw . IAL[ 3 I Dq. sw. O 0 - -00000 O Sr. tie i l ��t-}-tG rkEMN[ Pt O N of )0000 _ sr"� NNr Ce KfcT .LLP �A.. 1 S < - �� 0 sw.eNn tr. s ti 332,11 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT mE'TAIL PROJECT: PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE (Seca S4) DIVISION: OPERATIONS--WASTEWATER(212) — 130th Avenue to Scholls' Ferry:Road. PROJECT LOCATION: Summer Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work on this portion of Summer Creek to include the he placement of rock in and along stream removal of debris and sediment; t channel for erosion control and bank protection; and the seeding and mulching i of stream banks.s Annual maintenance of a related nature will be required to preserve the natural drainage and enhance smooth stream flow. be as conditions of development.as growth Most probable funding sources would occurs in vicinity. g • #-2t-x3ix-x-1Ex-x-H-3Exx-x#K•�t-x-x-H-x-x-xx=�•)t�Fx-x-x#x-x-?E#�t-##-�-x#-x-x-x-x-x-xa(-x-YeH-x-xx-DEx-x�EBFtE3S-x-Mx-xiEH-DEx-x-x-x-x3Ex-1E3(-xx _ ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: } Preservation of natural drainage - 2,300 lf. $ 17,000 r: TOTAL: $ 17,000 ; iEx•3(-x-1tiFDE#-x#-x3Ex-x-x-x-x-x-x-x#Hx-tHE-xx-�Fx-DE#xxx x-xYEx-x-x?(x-3t-xit-x-x-fEx-x-x-3(-x-iEx-x-x-3(-x x-3Ex-x-X x#TEx-YEx�t-xDt'(-xxaE�{-x-x x ' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN L FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87FY 87-88 FY 88-89 _ TOTAL Y Federal $ $__ $ $ State City $ $ $— $ $ 17,000 Developer $ $ 171000 $ - T 0 T A L S $ $ 17,000 $ $_ $ $17,000 ?; E o��-x-ra-x-xx-x-x-x-x-a;-xa�-te�x�-x�-x-x-x�t-xx-x-x-x-x-x-x-x•x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x��cxas-x-x-x•�-.�-x•x-x��-�x-x-x �xUxxxx�a• `��_ ! R LOCATION: I�cwaLLs , Q�°�poc°oma ,, 5 _/ ° 000 - 0 0000 ° `�,,, 1• u i 'O O u°0 000 00000 000000000 000 C'^^'„^J 00000 000 00t 80 O 000 S• K'ti _ yr�� 9 0U GO� ^, c, O 00 O00(Al D 00 s �. Pi e000O0 OOC Jfff�iiii• 00000000 O00000000 0 0000Y sw0°Oo s �onT� o�NOT.s j 0000VOO° X00 - - ° - .£ayA = 00 "o 00 suvN£a` s ay. u 000 00 00 00-0 LN. I f rya O '� ODUU sN & �� Y.A� G �(� G .oT Nsaoo-n •* a ¢L IT. f4. i feLc IGw. G 00000 0 SII - )00 00 O sT � )0000 - 1. �It4Tk£R9f M = UGG i £� I31 ( TIa FIM) + — � OUOOO ° OOOGOJUO 7 I((�� • ° IT .�7. ay.x a s . N..... °� ,�,< ; . g.. -e ttjj`` � �.�k,� y .+.,,." MEN Mama CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: IN CONJUNCTION WITH SELECTED DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS STREET.RECONDITIONING PROJECTS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: `, Storm drainage improvements are provided annually in conjunction with selected street reconditioning projects Attention should be directed to the appr'opr'iate street project and FY described in the streets division of the C.I.P. Plan. Most probable funding source would be the Storm Drainage Fund (SDF), and Storm Drainage-Systems Development Charge (SDC). iEtl�tiE3#3(-x#�E�4-)E-x-K-#-x-K-M.•##id-J�Yc-}f-x-H3f-X�E#x-)Ftf-1(-x#)t-k x-rf?tiEx-M fE-k'9i-x3EiFDEx-XlE-xit-ii-H H-x-M34-2E#M•ff-PF#Df-x-�-Dt-M��i-x x••x-x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $30,000 per year @ 5 yrs. $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 ± 3f#�Eit-DF•M••3S-x-x•bFX#tf-�Q-H##`,Fx#-YQiEDEIH(-x-DFx#H•iElE-xdF-x-M-x#�i-Dc-D(-x##-1i-)E##-)F u-M<#iEit�Q-Ai-�x#YHE-x-M-x-Df-x'rt-x�iE3f-bt-'�x#Dc-M�(it SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY-88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ — $ $ Cate --- $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $_13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 67,500 SDC--Storm Drn $__16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $_16,500 $ 16,500 $ e2,500 3. OT A L S $_30,000 $ 30,000 $_ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000_ i(-k•�'HS,.£•it 3E'J(if3d-M#Mei#DB#H-?i-➢f-#•H'1E-Mi£3t�$d�E-r'f-3Q•�f-�-M-k•�f3t-if-M-�-i{�t•�E3d-I(-ki(if-M-?f�(-'tEiti4�4#14-M-3t-Mii3i-3t-�ic=n=ri ac n bf-3(3(#�(it-H x x-Y.- LOCATION: i ' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRX4 PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASIEWATER(212) pROJECT: DOWNTOWN STORM DRAIN TRUNK LINF DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT LOCATION: DOWNTOWN AREA Commercial, PROJ_GT DESCRIPTION: connecting Scoff ins, R storm drain trunk line to be constructed, at Fanno Creek. Burnham, and Main Streets into a primary 4 x-X- #-X-1t ESTIMATE OFPROJECTCOST: $100,000 40,000 k Phase" I - FY 84-85 4 PhaseII- FY 86-87 TOTAL: $140,00 xXx1E�tXX iF?EX x#-X M xx#-AFx-xi(-X 3t-X-" SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN _ TOTAL z` FY> 86-87` FY 87-88 F_Y 8_8_89 — r FY 84-85 FY 85-g5 ___- Federal $_ ---- State $-- -- $— $�- __ $--- 0 e Cita? $---- �— $_ 18,0001p SDF — $ $ $00 Developer $ 100,000 $_!___-- $ 22 000 $_ $-------' e SDC-Storm Drn $_____ $ $- --- $------ $--_------ I -- — --------- $ 140,0 $ 40 TOTA LS $ 100000 $ 000__ $-----_- - Pa ALL ClIwl ' LOCATION* (�t""°� o-k. MM _ ,• � _ C vii 7 c •S[ -� � / ...' C�� c� CT;�_•\f,t 9p t4 ` (/ � P � rCI�Y se iT s. l� s ='a'.,:ir a:a� c fin• ,� y d f a4.. 1 sa. r W \ rr NUnoap N I Jct .Gr T �i•. V t,tt�Y 1, � 1S ! �D,lV w TU o as/ • a V � � t T— ` �' s 1A CINIOt. ��~ �. CnV' . (�+ "�A � i � •+• `' �� `` a•Mfl sT. 4:]L, SA. / N C.t/. • Sit .� J ( r� �. ct �./"0.M•:.N. Sa T araiNi Pte, �1� � —y rar...w•r �[`w�\�, ' IONNi4 'C '� �i y _flat Je`4s� C v. P C* l( 4 \ la.• 'WVMi 4T �! as � (" v� �� r � '•:'� _ � � `~ � coq � q aco JS •tea y t �`°'sa • .p J! 4 i• s C /A f A f T. " .T S � • J _ Y'•' w n sa. l u e✓° Jr �. J a + •ti, • u 1�� , „_ � H it 3P9CwOCA !T, r� CAPITAL IMPROVEMEUT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNELIZATION (sec.S2) RKS DIVISION: OPERATIONSARTMENT: PUBLIC -WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Summer Creek - 1490' downstream of 121st Avenue to 280' upstream of 121st Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of Summer Creek are planned to enhance stream flow and< prevent flooding. lined, These improvements will include the construction of a g trapazo ida!-shaped channel with a 15' wide bottom and side slopes `of 2 to I. A riprapped trickle channel, to protect the stream bed at low volumes, is also proposed. Probable funding sources include the Storm Drainage Fund; Storm Drainage - SDC and as conditions of development. #x-?t-x#-Mit-Hit-x-x-exit-M-x:)Fx�(ii-�f-;f-x-x-H-x-x-)E/Ei(-xxlC'H-;f-k;ExiEPf-}FtEH-x•H#-x#-x -K-bE####it-H#-?EHH-H-i£-:E3t-x-Yf-H�EHiFH-x-HiE-M-## ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: _ 1600 If- Construct grass-lined channel w. 150' of riprap $ 15,000 Phase I FY 84-85 34,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 15`,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 15,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 15,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 94,000 'd#-x-xit'HiF-Di-xif-Hifi{-HiE-}4-H#-M-DI�-X-3(iFHjEit-x-H-Df-Hitit'x-H H'H-H-M-3t-H'rEiE--x-k-lt-H)(#H-M�S#-H-x-x-xii-M-x-3t-DEiE#x-xiE-H-M##-xiEXif-3fx-M-# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL $ $ $ $ Federal $ $_ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ 750 SDF $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6 750 $ 6 750 19000 Developer $ $ 19,000 $ $ SDC-Storm Orn $ 8 250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $$ 8,250 $$ 8,250 $$ 41;250 T 0 T A L_S $ 15,000 $ 34,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 94,000 X#3f-H-H##-3Fi(-�(H#if##iFHH'x OAK 3 x k'h�E#H H#iH(�t x H YFM M�(H H?E#H H H#x NrH H x H HiF#H YcHiE#H` L L1OCATIO�NeF E:-eoa� � R o 000 00000 0 9oc 90 OS1,100001.1 0�°OoO ° 0 �O0 00OO 000 8o°o r 00 000" 0 00 °O0 000C . 000 LcxasraEs cn. 0000 O 000 P I t`q "' _ uAxz.xlrA 00000 O O (� « OOOO S. r[•a Si. _ Zai 00_00 0 N xoxtx onrorA 00 °O 90 000 00 70` 90 suM.Ex xea.ya s al. °00 000 « W ¢ \ O�Oa°!J O OO IIi. JM Q' S.W. TIOAP6 ° ° 9� s.. f q Sx l� 111 °90 90 000 ...., N 1 SEMIS 0000 ''"sW isxf.E i to c fm. ° O 0 ,00000 �` t 0 _��>0000 00 y 0000_000000 0000000 CT F sr.N O uCl rrr. �a �4'j f is s N O i � 9 y 1� • ST s ' n_ C e CAPITAL IMPROVEMEffT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FLOODPLAIN STUDIES DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Existing Storm Drainage System Inventory & C:ap Recommended Storm Drainage Structure Replacement Program Recommended Storm Drainage Trunk System & Map Red Rock Creek - Mouth to I-5 Ball Creek •- Mouth to I-5 Unnamed Tributary of Fanno 'Greek - Mouth (1000' downstream of Tiedeman Ave.) to 115th Avenue Unnamed Tributary of Fanno' Creek - Mouth (800' downstream of Main St.) to Hillview Street . vac#-X-tE�f-M3(3�H�'E��t-)4it-Dt-H-DEii-AE-M-Hi��Yit-K-x-H-3'#•�'�'iii-M�-#3(-DEa`i-D(-)E#-3f-�-D:iE###D`3t#H-�QK-#-Dt-Mi4-?t-!E#�::AYE#3f-MA-)t-H-M-H-M-H-H-Tt-}:#-N ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $10,000 allocated annually for 5 years $ 50,000 TOTAL: $ 50,000 �#-x-3t-x-�•a�t-s�-�•#�t x- �-�•# •3t-x-jtaE-tf�tt�x#�ca�#-x�t-x-x-it-x-ts-ata-x###ac-pt-xatacit-x-x-##x-x-�#'�-x-x-x�-H-x-#-x-�-x x x•�n-� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $- $ $ $ z $ , State $ $ $ $ $ $ SOF $_ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 41500 $ 4,500 $ - 4,500 $ 22,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ 5,500 $_5,500_ $ 5,500 $ 51500 $_ 5,500 $$ 27,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 10,00.0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $_ to o00 $ 50,000 acMcxnxsc�xxxxaaxa�usac# � ac�tr�cxscxxxxxxxxxx�xxx #xx#�c�a�tkxxxxxxxkux LOCATION: -- COMM CAPITAL IMPROVEM04T PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: CULVERT REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-Wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An annual replacement of undersized, inadequate, or defective culverts and other drainage- equipment i provided, in conjunction with a continual updating of the City's Hydraulic Structures Inventory (CH2M-Hill Master Drainage Study), under the Recommended Storm Drainage Structure Replacement'Program. #�C D(-x3t-xX-M-FHF x-H-x-x#x-x-x#x-1H(x-x-x-#x-x-)E x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-1F3(-x iE-x3t-1Ht-H-3E#dE3E�Fx-x-x-SHE-x-#�Fx-x-x-x-3t�(-'+Ex-x-x-x-x-id-x-iHc-x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $30,000 'allocated annually for 5 years $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 }t#�A-H-}Hc-x-x-x�i-x3t#Di#iF)E�ii-M x-3�rx-x-xi�Fx�E-x�E3E-x-x�£-x-x-x-x-#-x-3(-x-x-x�(it-x-36�t#iHE•Df-xi'c4t-x-x'�E-3t-1t xii-kFxixH-)t-x#�##-x-Dt# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY;87-88 FV 88-Bg TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $— $— $ State $ $_ City $ $— $ SDF $ 13 500 $ 13,500 $_13.500_ $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 67,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ 16,500 $ 16.500 $$ 16,500 $$ 161500 $$ 16 500 , $ 82,500 T 0 T A L S- $-301000 $_30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 �-x-�-xat-x�-x�-x-?t-+Est-x�•�-x-�x�c-�€�-x�3�c��-tf-�a�-�x-x-x-x�#�t-x-x-�t x-x-x�c-x-x-3Hc#-��c-x-x-x-at-x3h�-x-x M-P:-x�-xat-x -�-xat-x x-x* LOCATION: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNF-LIZATION (Sec. F7) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS.-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Fanno Creek - 750' upstream of Grant Avenue to 100' upstream of North Dakota Street. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of Fanno } Creek are planned to enhance stream' flow and prevent flooding. These the channel course; the improvements will include ;the straightening of ` the stream bed, with more gentle sloping of banks; deepening and widening of and the installation of 450' of ' riprap on either sides of Tiedeman Avenue Bridge, Tigard Street Bridge, and North Dakota Street Bridge, to protect bridge supports .from increased stream flows. d be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage Most probable funding sources woul SDC and as conditions of development. ##iE x�(#x Y(x 3f M xiHf x#xi€x x x x x3Kt�4 3�xi(x x x##M x#if x x x xif#K-x-xi(x i(#x#x xit x x x x K* ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct grass-lined channel w. 450' of riprap - 5,820 if. $116,000 Phase I - FY 85-86 265,000 Phase II FY 86-87 115,000 Phase III FY 87-88 TOTAL: $496,000 s #-M-x#Af-K•x#x-..�"�.,.x xit K##x-x#x-?t-xi(3HE 1Fx-K-x-)i-)(#K x-x#x-x-x-K-x-3E�fiE-lf-x-x#X-x-x-x-x#-x-xiFx-)EK M�(-x-x-K-x#x-H-x-#-x-3(-x#x�E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN y.. FY 84-85 FY 85-86 F" 86-87 FY :87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ $ $ 67,500 $ $ $ 67,500 Developer $ $ 116,000 $ 415,000 $ 115,000 $ $ 346,000 $ $ 82 500 $ $ $-_ 82,500 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ T O T A L S $ $ 116,000 $ 26� 5,000 $ 115.000 $ $ 496,000 -x t(-x-x-}rH�t•'ASS-x-�t-x-xi6#x-Dt-K#xx-3F s iHEx 3i x x K#xiHE K X�i x 3E#�H(#9(YcxiEii KiH(#x 3f3E xiH4#xi(iE x#K YFKif#Yc'k x#1F#M x ST �1iL�GCA�7ION �`fJ,✓� oooao`�o°.o°o. 000s0,0 000 00 0000 000 R o 00 o O° ° 00000 00 0 000° , r °� L n.� 0 Q 000 0 0000 •" ices,'- - O� F8:110 °O b ...,. f. 00 0OAl00 ta. ° ��I —q. 0 00 0p00</-A i 000 �o.Dsrary s sTE. -. 0000 0 000 ��i n a s i .azaaiTa 00000 O O 0000 f as n0hf DAn2jj .._ST. I. 000 7O t.N • M1OM1Ta DAKOTA 0 00 0 Q° ` # • � `\ - O QO O O � s a. naeAD at s s.a ra ° QO o 0000 N 6 000 c o cE pis S �3 s x ra co l� O 1 O - Q =I 00000 C 00 .��t.e.-�� fa M _ •0 Y °OOOC,".....,'JOO ; •.�� y, ` fq � � ! 96E r(' ll a v n l^� le lT a O .,ti , ,� f ,, F . �� ,� � . ;: a x. r , ': CAPITAL IMPROVZMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: IN CONJUNCTION WITH SELECTED DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS STREET RECONDITIONING PROJECTS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Storm drainage improvements are provided annually in conjunction with selected street reconditioningprojects. ' Attention should be directed to the appropriate street project and FY described in the streets division of the C.I.P. Plan. Most probable funding source would be the Storm Drainage Fund s(SOF), and Storm Drainage-Systems_Development Charge (SDC). #x-H-3HE-x-�HYN#-x-iF-x-1Ek-x-#x-x-tt-DE�IFiH�EYE-3ExiE x-x 3E-x-x-x-tEYF 3Q-x-:El(x-x-x-it-x-x3E x-Dt x-M?f-x-x i(-it-x-Dix-x#it-34i(-)E-D�-x-H x-x-}HEx-x-x-x-x-M ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $30,000 per year @ 5 yrs. $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 '.(x-x'ItiE?Fif-x�4#x#M#b+EAS-#-i(-14-Tf-3Ex-x-H-1Q-3S3fiFx3S'.t3Ex-)(-KiEK#}}(Fxi(-x-?t-3Ex-M'if-DE-3Ex-1(-x-lHf-)E)Q-�S K•i#-x-x-M3E-xi.iE•DE-)Fi(-DFxi(-icx�-n�x-)E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $_ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $— City' -- $ $____ $ $ $ $ SDF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 67,500 SDC_;; to-m Drn $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 . $ 16,500 6 82,500 T 0 T A L S 30 000 $ 30,000 $,.;30,OOQ $ 30,000 $ 30,fl00 $ 150,000 LOCATION: ; is PRIDE 11 1 11 it 0 1W CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAPi PLAN t' PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNELIZATION (Sec. F6) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: FANNO CREEK-1550' downstream of Main Street to 750' upstream ofGrantAvenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Majorchannelimprovements along this portion of Fanno Creek are planned to enhance stream flow and prevent flooding. These improvements will include the ,straightening of the ,;channel course; the deepeningand widening of the stream bed with more gentle sloping of banks; and the 'installation of 700' of riprap on either sides of Grant Avenue bridge ` and Main Street bridge to protect bridge supports from increased stream velocities. Most likely funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDC(and as conditions of development. � #SHE#-)E#x-x-x-x-x-)f-x-K R'�)(#x##x-x-x#-x-x-x-x-x#�(-H-x-x 1(i(-x-x-x'x'x i(-x H-x�Fx fit'#x-1(-##x�(-TE-K'#'##-x-x'##-)('h-x)(-x-x-x-�•:E kii-x-xiF ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct grass-lined channel w. 700' of riprap -- 3,655 if. $194,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 130,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 65,000 Phase III - FY 87-88 TOTAL: $389,000 *N-X-X#x x-x x-x-H x'X-)(-x#x-x•xi,-x x-xiE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY '87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State _ $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $__ $ SOF $ $ 58,500 $ __ $ 29,250 $ $ 87,750 Developer $ 194,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1 , 0 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ 71,500 $ $ 35,750 $ $ 100 7,22 50 T 0 T A L S $ 194,000 $ 130,000 $__ $ 65,000 $ $ 389,000 { '�-x-�-3F-HE(-DEHit3'�x�(-!:#x'�fiH(-#-H-H-Ycx-x-H-x'H-M'a('�1-H-M-X-xit-)(-H-x-)(#)E'x-1�)(-x'xi(iE•DE#-H-Y(-H-H-xif-H-x-x-Y(-)EH-x-x"x-i(�(-M-x-HiE-xi(x#x-DF#3( !j LOCATION. v l > tLA G )O `.i� O(OjOi s.. \\\r c� •ncc�N s e �` �"- if ^r�C J a _°� 'c �' ^�oe [.?C '� ,,. 000000 O se •, ,'(J�` � tt nnJ )000 )OOOOr --��\ ..' ` ;r ,? f C.( r'O > G ST~ (',O�OOrO( p0\ ,r �'A �. '°: �,• nC)t O�Ot�(' .ca.c s- aa n i. FMaT._ — h. s * [`�- C.0 • ., �� \� GO J s (ids �. % C ♦.. (-'� C_._: 2 s. ,ounce � y � J cn nr �. his`J(\ ``•S,• . rj �_ � ;G .. OOC�.t)O � Vk s, � aera[� a 0 ��°• , /�, \ t( G. 4 O. Jr O� �}� OC s. , T F • )r r 7 ( Or `� >r i PT'f t o,L_ hJ � L��- 4T '•-�' 1(� -C)n . 0 J to • e f t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT : STREAM CHANNELIZATION (Sec.S2) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Summer Creek - 1490' downstream of 721stAvenue to 280' upstream of 121st Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of Summer Creek are planned to enhance stream flow and ; prevent flooding. These improvements will ' include the construction of a grass—lined, trapazoidal'—shaped channel with a 15' wide bottom "and side slopes 'of 2 to I. A riprapped trickle channel,'; to protect the stream bed at low volumes, is also proposed. Probable funding sources include the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDG and as conditions of development. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct grass—lined channel w. 150' of riprap — 1800 If. Phase I FY 84-85 $ 15,000 Phase II — FY;85-86' 34,000 Phase III FY 86-87 15,'000 Phase IV — FY 87-88< 15,000 Phase V — FY 88-89 15,000 TOTAL: $ 94,000 �(3fSEx#XXxxDEx�(#XxKx#1HtxXDtxiE�ExitXxi4 XXx-X-X##-K-"-xx-x xxXxR#XXXiE#XxXx#X1H(XXXYv#xifXxiEXX# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN +_ FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ Stats $ $ $ $ $ $ Cites $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 19000 Developer $ $ 19,000 $ $ $ $ 00 SDC—Storm Drn $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 41,250 T O T A L S $ 15,000 $ 34,000 $_ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 94,000 #it3dxxx#x#x�fi�#xxXxxXit)tx#X31Q�x/eaxXxx�(x1ExxXX-x#XtExX�FXxDFxx1(#�FXFt#/X(xDFxXxxicrtx�fxXDE s✓ a' ,110108 LOCATION: - °0 0: 0- ° 0°� 00 0000 00000 O Ao0 00X06 00000 /J 000000000 0000^^'Y`' °O000°oo t r7 0°�r�� oo tw 000 V °O� FQ 7 O @ O 1.d 00 0001 Al F 00 sK. S-' ..v..n " s. 0O °O0 OOC /"J OOO° IONOSTAR ° t a�1. Sv sw a 0000 O 000 In'zn ^ a+zsartA 00000 O O �I s 00°O w c:^- (w' aT��j aonTr on.orA 0000 sw rwnT wK14 SC 00 T--, p N\ "'�� 00 0s - j0�0 °°°000 °°00 LLLJJJ O '� S w. TIalPO tC 1` Sw Sw l0 � k{l '.I I O°OO O (i � OOO c w iEw15 m � t i (q O a it 0000 a S. rwcE s a f 00000 O tT' ►t. t sA e - 70000 O ♦ sa ''��+ F e°C' '''}° U ss�sK te. ° } n► q O +�-+~e��70000 _ tf—\. `. fasa J't� �� am w - _ 000 nrmT 00007...:.,000 ` ao,� E KCai r u•E z," 0 sw tx z 0000000 x 7T O �W * x - CT. Im ) a : ° = o a166 is 5 sr.swn sT. sf� " � °0©� �M•s 4a ON sx s r� t :' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FLOODPLAIN STUDIES '' DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Existing Storm Drainage System Inventory,& Map RecommendedStorm Drainage Structure Replacement Program Recommended Storm Drainage Trunk System '& Map Red Rock Creek – Mouth to I-5 Sall Creek Mouth to I-5 Mouth (1000' downstream of Tiedeman Ave.) Unnamed Tributary of Fanno Creek to 115th Avenue Unnamed Tributary of Fanno Creek - Mouth (800' downstream of Main St.) to Hiliview Street ##Mi(#K*-)t St-DEx-H"-**-X-x-K-x#x x x St#M lE Sti(H#�X#,Y#H=+(9EH H?E H Mii 7F#Dt H3Ex 2�M kS H x)t M x x K x x x H 1E#M x#x�t#X DE## ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $10,000 allocated annually for 5 years $ 50,000 TOTAL: $ 50,000 iQ-Pt-):-�#Yf',H(#i(-tt-M'h'•M-H-?F1fM-H#iFM-M-kiHf#M-1Ht#Dei(#AH(#FS#M#-X-X-K-DFi(iF1(-1(•1Q-R X#i(#THFx-Drit-}EYcx-DE#it-H�#Z4##F#�f)f-%�F2E-1�' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN .. FY 84-85 FY85-86 FY :86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $— $ $— $ _ State - — $ $ $ $ —. $-- $ City $ $ $— $— $.-- $ SDF $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 22,500 SDC–Storm Drn $_ 5,500 $ 51500 $ 5,500 $ 5,500 $$ 5,500 $ 27,500 $ $ $— $ T O T A L S $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $_ 10,000 $ lo,Ooo_ $�10,000 $ 50,000 u s x x cat#x*.H-x*x x x x x sus�a x c x x�c x x x x �t x�a x x x x x�c x x x fc u x tt xat�c x-x*Xx LOCATION: E z mw CAPITAL IMPR0VEMENT PRGGRAM PLAN { PROJECT DETAIL' PROJECT: CULVERTREPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An annual replacement of undersized, inadequate, or defective culverts and other drainage equipment is provided, in conjunction with a continual updating of the City's 'Hydraulic Structures Inventory (CH2M-Hill Master Drainage Study), under the Recommended Storm Drainage Structure Replacement Program. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $30,000 allocated annually for 5 years $150,000 TOTAL: $150,OOO SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL — Federal $ $ $ $ $ IS State $ $ $ $ $ $ City SOF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 67,500 SDC—Storm Drn' $_ 16,500 $ 16,500 $_ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 82,500 T O T A L S_ $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 M;E x x %'�Fft#�)4 xiC k#x PE x P(x3�N�c��3�x�i3t?d x't ii x#x�c x 3HExiE'Rat xi£it PE x Y xitiE x x�(iH4 xiE x�C x 9f#3(it x.(#x x X* s LOCATION: E CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL" PROJECT: STREAM CHANNELIZATION (Sec. F7) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: : Fanno Creek 750'` upstream of Grant Avenue to 100' upstream of North Dakota Street. PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Major channel' improvements along this portion of Fanno Creek are ,planned to enhance stream flow and prevent flooding. These improvements will include the straightening of the channel course; the deepening and widening of the stream bed, with more gentle sloping of banks; and the installation of 450' of riprap, on either sides ;of Tiedeman Avenue Bridge, Tigard Street Bridge, and North Dakota Street Bridge, to protect bridge supports from increased stream flows . Most probable funding sources 'would be the Storm Drainage Fund Storm Drainage SDC and as conditions of development. aH(#aEx�f-x-xiEi;'#x-3HE##-x-DEit7(-xx�(-x#�(x-TE�(:iQ-DHf-x x-xi(-x-it#-?t x-D(-x-x�(-1(if-i(iE�t�t�(-x- if-x-3(-x-x-x-x-x-x xj(-xx'A9E-x jEDE�( 'rt-DHExiE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: i Construct grass-lined channel w. 450' of riprap - 5,820 lf. $116,000 Phase'I - FY 85-86 265,000 Phase II - FY 86-87 115,000 Phase III - FY 87-88 496,000 TOTAL: $ 3Ei#i4x-YEit-x-x-x-x-x-x'd�t-xa(-)Fx-3EaEx-K x-x-dE#-x�E#-x-x-xat-x x-x-x-x-x-x�EDFxi4-x-x-x-x-x-x-x�x-x-x-x-x-Df x-xx-)Eat-x-x-�x-x-K x-xx-xx-YHF#�t-x : SCHEDULE;AND FUNDING PLAN- FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 .' FY 87-88_ FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ ` $ $_ $— $ r State $ $ $ $ $ $— City $ $ - $ $ $ $ SDF $ $ $ 67,500 $ $ $ 67,500 Developer $ $ 116,000 $ 115,000 $ 115,000 $ $ 346,000 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ $ 82,500 $ $ $ 82,500 T O T A L S $ $ 116,000 $ 265,000 $ 115,000 $ $ 496,000 �-x-x�t-x-x-x-x-�tx-st-x-x�c-x-�Ex�-x-x-x-x-►Ex-xatatxat-x-x-x✓-x aE�t--x-n-x-x-3t oo ti' :t't,it.cN�aun3yg'>6.��,R'c—e'j�-c—eou�s ."''t'i ✓n.a=_' pO°Os°..�'p✓� O"t'o"o,ooye ^ c 00 �00o0000 O to.� 0 00 °4. LoGnoQts IryOt n°°o � ,OO ? * �yO 1 E ° sLOCATIONo 000 Q 0 0000QO° c p oo°°° oooo � Z 00 Q° pL p 0O°t ° o ° c QQ0 s, S° srE O00 0000 O 000 00000 O 0S. O - 0 p4 O A� Hca., 00 00 � Su��E9' ��r x Q°o°o °o°. E � oGQ 0 0 p pOpO�p 00sT. °~ o s v. naano sc rt s.. t s«Ln t 00 pC, 000 \f f LLMIS N 6 s O p fs <t t IOQOO000 `\ LnSp iM,ff �0000 O sr n? cw �e t•'� O ,+e 5 '•�i sz+z. '�w,..E O v ns. O 4 )0000 - Cq sb s o L7 es wea�r; LL - 0 sw Lr c. 0000000 ! O p O O c,y �. >. w.p s.x.aro+aT. ., a•s y ' P• 00p Q r� :' r ri 3 k • s ,n �� :.11=: ..._._. .. ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GRANT AVENUE BRIDGE DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: Grant Avenue at Fanno Creek. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace` bridge to eliminate major impediment to a high-water flow of ''Fanno, Creek, and prevent subsequent flooding of Grant Avenue. Most likely funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage - SDC and System Development Charge - Streets (SDC). ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Replace Grant Avenue bridge - 100' span $272,000 TOTAL: $272,000 K##x#;E-x-x-X-X-x-WX-X x x x x�Hf xx�E x x�E x�3(x x#x x x x 3E 1t x SEx x?E Df x x xiE#x xiEx x�()f'E#-X-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x##x-x-x-x-X x x� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85=86 FY 86=87 FY 87-88 FY 88=89 TOTALr_ Federal $ _ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ _ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ $ $ $ 61,200 $ $ 61,200 SDC - Streets $� $ $ $ 136,000 $ $ 136,000 SDC-Storm Drn $ $ $ $ 74,800 $ $ 74,800 T O T A L S $ $ $ $ 272,000 $ $ 272,000 T #-x'3t-Mit-x-x-D'caEi(-iQi#-x-%x-)t-xiE-x-x3t-xaHFx#x-x-xiEM-Di#xii#x-x�(-Yti4-x�E3(�i�t-xiEYr3E-x-x-JFD(-D(?��x:i-x•M-H•x-#xiEi1Fx-`x��EE\#\DExi(-xiEx#D#-x-?c _...__ _ SR LOCATION:, EE Sw"' Psi KtN �. ST. Pl WH Q 16 ! P - RT �T- �[ /� ' ORRO ♦� r' r- r N�NIiT ST.„ yy Sw.AMNST. ♦ �p h T�Pc,�'I ` s ��!'�`y�./J Sl a. WAr - f` < � y4 ♦cif `l. \ Fr � e?f_ b B�a � , r\•// R / SIE. 4 ,S,Y i 4.w. IPsR�f q b r ST. Sw. F f` S.w. ♦ A 94 A V� / ST i;PPV.E � t� N S.W RGNNEP .� � ✓ .p. OR S.T ��;f" � O,C •i ' s a, 3¢i�,y yf•vil Ti ET, PG PRY A hr 4' / SW., VAANS ST A[9 RA s ♦' eq �� dN, 7-1 f ��•i��t F Y6 aP'4-F�. Y 511. 63dAfl4 SSC. j�.w Y.� SW. � �(MG.RaAF`11. ST. � r � � to �♦�/ SMEN EP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: NORTH DAKOTA STREET BRIDGE DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: 'OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: North Dakota Street at Fanno Creek.' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace bridge to eliminate major impediment to high—water ,flow of Fanno Creek, and prevent 'subsequent flooding of North Dakota Street. Most likely funding sources would be the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage SDC and System Development Charge — Streets (SDC). ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Replace North Dakota Street bridge — '80' span $278,000 TOTAL: $278,000 iE'DEiEx-?Fx-Dt-#-if-x-##DFk x-x#-"n�c�c-n-�#�t-x-DE-31#x-xifM-f4-DE-x-xiE-#•Dt-x-3(-DFDE#-x-x#x-x-x-x-#-x-x-x-x-x'R-x-x�Ex-#x-x'#•H-4f'3E'#-3t x-,f-x-x-x-M-3(-# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY '85-86 FY 86—III FY 87-88 - FY 88-89 TOTAL ' Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ $ $ $ 62,550 $ $ 62,550 SDC Streets $ $ $ $ 139,000 $ $ 139,000 SDC—Storm Drn $ $ $ $ 76,450_ $ $ 76,450 T 0 T A L S $ $ $ $ 278,000 $ $ 278,000 iE#3£x x,Y'it x xit M.3f iE x3ti#YFx iQ x_lE#?Eit x3£x x M X if x x�t#;Elf!#Pf�Ex'�HEifx x�Q M Ji'(x%)(a{�Q x H x 1E3F3t D4 M#(i(�tif xit x x x K X* LOCATION: t Dov[- 1�'.._��I i a SY( �I''�fR &_•ST.-.�® S. 6AP.C1�_ �SY- �. 3�t VENTER 27.6 L�NOA4_.._.i 34•S ST. f4'Ppli am�N < CL i 1� - ��''jj y i 4APLELEAF ;�ST 1 i rr `< c<9� +v --------------- S _.�__ _— SWw OA ' `!L�.1 ST. J 1 6c lll. `� ' SM. OAK ST. r ' E3z. LONOSTAIM °O sSTEVE tAN ANITA (P!n ST m i' w ST. a -a NORTH ^AROTA SW NORT OAi(Oig Alt �.. S.W. T16AR0 r _ iF Jf CAPITAL IMPROVENT PROGRAM<PLAN, PROJECT-DETAIL. PROJECT: IN CONJUNCTION WITH SELECTED DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS STREET RECONDITIONING PROJECTS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Storm drainage, improvements are provided annually in conjunction with selected street reconditioning_ projects. Attention should be directed to the appropriate street project and FY described in the streets division of the C.I.P. Plan. Most probable funding source would be the Storm Drainage Fund (SDF), and Storm Drainage–Systems Development Charge (SDC). MxitXDF'tK#✓c3Exltx#xxxxAx #K#3cx#x#xxxKx;4xxM#xx#xxxDExxYrx�(x3EKx#xxxxthxx�E#xxxaE3Q#x#i(xitx#x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Approximately $30,000 per year @ 5 yrs $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 i�-x#x-K-xii#xifx-#�t-x-Yc3(-Yrbt�#lEid-Tt H-xi(#2Ex-IE#x-x-)(-Mif-K'hx-x#}EKii-x-)(-)f-x#x-x#x#i(-Df-DFK�E�EH-xx-K#3fiQ-x�EiE3Fx-}f3Ex-iQ-x-x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86--87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ -$ State $_ $ — $ City $ $ $ $_ $_ $ SDF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 500 $ 67�500 _13, SDC-Storm Drn $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 82,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ C $ $ $ $_ $_ $ T 0 T A L S $ -30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $_30,000 $ 150,000 I :ex-,c-K#x-K�-x-x-�-x-x-xx-x•:=.-x-x#x-K#�a��-x-x-x-K->�rs#K�#x-x-x-x-x x-x-x#x-x�#x-x-x#x#x�c�-x-x-x-x#x-x#x-x-x-x-x#x-x-x-�c x K-� f LOCATION: s. 6 . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREAM CHANNELIZATION (Sec.52) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: ' OPERATIONS—WASTEWATER(21.2) PROJECT LOCATION: Summer Creek - 1490' downstream of 1.21st Avenue to 280' upstream of 121st Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Major channel improvements along this portion of Summer - - Creek are planned to enhance stream flow and prevent flooding. These improvements will include the construction of a grass—lined, trapazoidal—shaped channel with a 15' wide bottom and side slopes of 2 to 1. A riprapped trickle channel, to protect the stream bed at low volumes, is also proposed. Probable funding sources include the Storm Drainage Fund, Storm Drainage SDC and ,as conditions of development. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct grass—lined channel w. 150' of riprap — 1800 lf`. Phase I FY 84-85 $ 15,000 Phase II FY 85-86 34,000 ' Phase III FY 86-87 15;000 Phase IV — FY 87-88 15,000 Phase V — FY 88-89' 15,000 TOTAL: $ 94.000 �ti(}E#DE ii 3Ht Hat#H H Hif X*-X- H-K-X H H�f�f H H#H 34#Hii H H-H-H#H X-M M**-X-X-M 3-*X*Y(X_* SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-86 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ city SDF $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 33,750 Developer. $ $ 19,000 $ $ $ $ 19,000 SOC—Storm, Qrn $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 8,250 $ 41,250 TOT A L S $ 15,000 $ 34,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 94,000 }Y-4EH-li-DHE'H-}S-K-�'-9f-H-#3E#-YF"t-H#i('�(-HH-Y(�(-H-Hi('1C-f(--0F1HEr'H(-K-DE?FH-k-H-H#H-H-1(Hit-H-H#H=7S-#H-�F)t#H3S-H-H-�F-ff-H#/H-Di3hHi4-�f-!EihiEH�E#/-DE ,> t� 00LOCATION•o ° R oooa°oov oo• - rc\x >— oo0000 000 000°0 0 00000 oo,000°000°00 00 0^ 000 0 0000 ° o,A'0 S_ 0CFQ O 00 000< Al 00 00C 00 0 v 000 000 000000000 00 _'srLrTlLe • �it. O �, ► p /\��^,1 a ca sr 0000 O° ° �'✓ + MURtp n.Kor. sr• nORT Cd KO ST 00 00 O 00 p0°O° '°C)`° OOOO OOQ ,u o \ I pu p0 0 OO tr. � O 0 c I '�I sc n 0 p0 O (� 000 c LEyts _ n I CY FA cIM. O O , ° t I - 10000 O uuowr.* ' r... 111i14.JJJ}}zJ777 _�9 I - - )0000 e L! v+,s<a cnmE �O.. O � )OOOn _ si`! no�T�R LL•a Z>n x, L* s. OOO�JO00 E " T s ;� A•R a• F >ir # ET.» _ _ O O JO O Y s ' > • { i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN s t PROJECT DETAIL PUBI-IC`WORKS DEPARTMENT: S-WASTELJATER(212) PROJECT: FLOODPLAIN STUDIES DIVISION: OPERATION 'NROJECT LOCATION: 1JECT DESCRIPTION: stem Inventory & Map Existing storm 1) SY Iacement Program Recommended Storm Drainage Structure Rep Recommended Storm Drainage Trunk System & N1aP Red Rock Creek - Mouth to I-5 Mouth to I-5; 1000' downstream of liedeman Ave.) Ball Creek - of Fanno Creek - Mouth ( Unnamed Tributary to to 115th Avenue Mouth (8O0' downstream of Main St.) Unnamed Tributary of FannHillvieo Creek namew Street #xKDEH# KxMTtiE (Y�Hx xxai#lEx##x3txxxx D xHDfMXlHtxi�YrXiHEMiEx iE-�l-x-'AH3EX#iHEH-DQ'�i4-}£'XSt##�E#DEH a e - ESTIi'mATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 50,000 000 all Approximately annually for 5 years $lo, E $ 50,000 ` TOTAL'. DEH iEx DHExH DE# x x �. �.?1.�#�EH-x-x H3EDfiE1E4EDEx-H-��HE H-D€#�EaEH-H-K-M ry xD;rt#xSEDFDEHxK#3i3Ei(H#EDt#DHCH3FlEiEIF *� DING A FY 89 TOTAL TAL— SCHEDULE AND FUNFY 87-88 88=- - FY 85-86 FY 86-887 -- e. Feder $ State $r-- � $_ 500$ 4 500 $ 2 $-_ # 4 50Q $00 1' 2% 500 CSDFy-- $ 4—c-QO--$p � 50 $�� $—'Sy� $r 5,500 SDC_= Drn $_-1— $ ° 50,000 _---_-__ 10 COO $ 10 000 $ 10.000 1Q 000 T 0T ALS $—1-0 10-0-0 - - .yc-Ki(#H�l#�fii-D:3EH X#K#DF�#-xii-#�3S-DEHii-H-DFH#H-�i-H-H-Df-H-�hY-H'•S X��E-H DHQ-Hit#-H-�•��i#•�jE-H-D(i(-D(aFH�t-�• i 3t3i-D('rEX-Kif-K-H-H-iEH-�E-H 4 t LOCATION: .g CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN i` PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: CULVERT REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-WASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION:; An annual replacement of undersized, inadequate, or defective culverts and other drainage equipment is Provided, in conjunction with a 'continual updating of the City's Hydraulic Structures Inventory ' y (CH2M—Hill Maser Drainage Study), under` the RecommendedStorm Drainage Structure Replacement Program. ##xiE-xii-Df•�-Hx-3t-3(-K-DE-x-x-x�{-X x-DE#NiEDED�M-M-1Ex-x-x-Di#-Dt-x-x#-lf-x-�##�-x-Mi(it-x-�F#-xiE-M-x#-x#Pc#-x-x-x-M-x-x#it-it#x-x-tt�E1f ESTIMATE OF PROSECT COST: Approximately $30,000 allocated annually for '5 years $150,000 TOTAL: $150,000 xiFIE?#F£-x'rFD4 Y(F C x}cat IfDE## E#?E#YrDf MifM x 3Fi€ El€1(x x lE)E###H TF IEiE)t x##x f4#XiFX K19 D11 I r SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88: FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $` $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $_ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ SDF $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 67,500 SDC—Storm Drn $ 16,500 ^$ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 82,500 T 0 T A L S $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 150,000 x x x k at lEx"*K*#if-x-X4 RFx-x*74 #it-xii X-X"*"X-*X-x-X-X LOCATION s t I CAPITAL IMPR0VEMENT PROD PLAN i, PROJECT DETAIL } PROJECT: 121ST AVENUE/SUMMER CREEK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS c CULVERT REPLACEMENT DIVISION: OPERATIONS-t-!ASTEWATER(212) PROJECT LOCATION: 121st Avenue At Summer Creek. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace existing ,inadequate culverts under 121st Avenue € with two 66" culverts to eliminate a 'major impediment to high water flow of Summer Creek and ;prevent subsequent flooding of 121st Avenue. E x'x x-x' 'C ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Two 66" CMP Culverts, 60' lengths $ 30>000 r t. pgp G 1. { TOTAL: $ 30,000 �. .y�-x -x'�f-x-xx-x-x-DE-x3E3t'x-x-x-3c H-x x-x#xx�Fx-x-x-)E#'xit-x#x-xit'x�t-x-mE DE3Q-x'jE-x�fi4-x-x-x'xa:-x-x'kE-x-3t-x3r�Ex-x iE-x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL s Federal $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ - $ Cita $ $ $ $ $ $ i. SDF $ $ $ $ $ 13,500 $ 13,500 SDC—Storm Drn $ $ $ $� $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ $ $ $ $ $ TOT A L S $ $_ $ $ $,30,000 $ 30,00 -- 3E#'x#xi(-x-xiHt#§i'kk�E3c-x'M'#-M-x-x-3E3(-x-x"D('3E'x-x'kx-it'#-xit-3(-x-x-#'x-x�f3E'x-3t-x'x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-Yc?Fx�Q-x-td-M"x-x-34-x-x�E34->E-3Ei(-x-x-x#xit-!E_,_._ LOCATION: Il A2LHEq,y '� it, ii. Tfif O ' S.w. TI�RD T. j cac T DRI4E VV�� 9 E SW L`i J '_•'t •xV[ ,+a+I L LEWISL N A EL H'm _I I MEADOW a f I FAL, _LONFIS [D'R, 5�w�'� ST' PL. LI 33 3XATM^PIxE S II Y, 1 G RE!K tW(IIERIN STV�� 5 Sfy Fp� MIMYT x.aPO CT rD Eq JM ¢ t D QE R DT [� Tim.' LT1 —.ESST.bid.AKN ST. WPLNIrT 4'T'M c> m f !nix M1 w "y m i M T ci ST. S.W. R .N f *F pATNxS i w. W6� Y SW.ILbERTA ST. SPL gy �J `ry��ic s' I w F l7t Ni//�\ �VA 'JERK �- ` n O \ \ «/'� lr..[..\ w •- A coy �t Nw. ,AMes Ra 7 ' _-� �-^ m. �.-'' _ _ �° .. .. 1!Y. PUBLIC WORKS PARKS r� The primary functions of the Operations - Parks Division of Public Works have been the operation and maintenance of the City's parks system. The parks system is in a period of expansion, bosh in terms of total acreage and in', the amount and variety facilities planned. As these projects come on-line greater for their maintenance and demands will be placed on the 'Parks' Division t, operation. In addition to continued expansion of facilities at 'Cook Park, including 3 construction of a bandstand/stage, two new community level parks are scheduled to take shape over the next five years. These two parks Summerlake and s Fanno'Creek will provide greater geographic balance in the location of park facilities, more recreational opportunities for City residents, and relieve f some of the pressures of over use burdening Cook Park. Summerlake Park is a high priority project, currently taking ^haps in the t five t -rsinsection of the 'City. Some-'of the improvements planned - over the next five year's include ball diamonds, soccer fields, tennis courts, landscaping, picnic areas, fishing piers, and trails. Fanno, CreekPark is just beginning development in FY '83-84, but "should prove to be a major community level park,, centrally located, with easy access to downtown and the proposed Civic Center. Planned improvements include grading, landscaping, trails, foot bridges, open spaces, picnic areas and a small dam and lake. Tying many of the City's parks together in an interconnected area of natural open space encompassing the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries, the Greenway System of open space and trails is a major enhancement to the park system. It is the intent of the City, as outlined an the to expand and connect existing segments of bicycle/pedestrian trails C.I.P.. the Grepntaay into a unified trail network. Coordination of the Greenway trail system with the streets - -bicycle path system is intended to provide an integrated alternative transportation network in the City`. Funding for parks operation and maintenance has been derived primarily from r the General Fund and Parks - System Development Charge (SDC). As the parks system expands in physical size and number of facilities, an increasing share f of these fund allocations will be required for maintenance use only. Capital t construction of park projects have often been dependent on the uncertainties of, grants, and as conditions of development. These funding sources will remain important, although not dependable. To provide a steady, dependable source of revenue that would allow for planned development to occur, it is proposed that a parks bond of $670,000 be adopted. The Parks - SDC Funds are proposed to be utilized as a source of funds for nies for securing available grants. As the emergencies, and as matching mo City of Tigard continues to grow at a strong rate, increased utilization of the park system is anticipated to place greater demands on current facilities and necessitate provision of additional improvements. because of the impacts generated by continued development it is proposed that the current Parks-System Development Charge (SDC), of $100 per dwelling unit, be increased to $150 per residential unit. This increase would generate approximately x;37,500 annually to the Parks - SDC Funds for future park improvements, and maintenance. t HUM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN DIVISION DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ` bIVISION; Operations - Parks (2-1-4) $ 16,000 YEAR 1 - Cook Park Bandstand/Stage 12,000 Phase I -Cook Park Improvements (I) 234,500 Summer Lake Park Ballfields, Restrooms 85,000 Phase 'I -''Summer Lake Park' Improvemens (I) 10;000 Phase I -'Summer Lake Park'Improvements (II)„ 18,000 Phase'I Fanno Creek Park Improvements (I) 5,000 Phase I Englewood Park Improvements 3,,000 Jack Park Restroom Repairs 5,000 Phase' I - Greenway System (Open Space) 17,000 i. Phase I Greenway System (Trails) $ 70,000 9 YEAR 2 - Cook Park Eallfields 12,000 Phase II Cook 'Park Improvements (I) 50,000 Phase I - Summerlake Park Tennis Courts 75;000 Phase II Summerlake Park Improvements (I) 16,000 t Phase II SummerlakePark improvements (II) 20,000 Fanno Creek Park Improvements (II) 4-,000 Phase II - Englewood Park Improvements 5,000 4 Jack Park Trails' 4,000 Woodard Park Fence 5,000 Phase II - Greenway System (Open Space) 15,000 k Phase II Greenway System (Trails) $ 50,000 YEAR '3 - Cook Park Additional Parking 5,000 Cook Park horseshoe Pits 12,000 Phase III - Cook Park Improvements (I) 15,(100 Phase I Summerlake Park Parking 25,000 Please III - Summerlake Park Improvements (II) 15,000 Phase I - Summerlake Park Picnic Areas, Fishing Piers 8,000 Phase II - Fanno Creek Park Improvements (I) 5,000 Fanno Creek Park Dam, Lake 4,000 Phase III - Englewood Park Improvements 5,000 Woodard Park Bridge Replacement 5,000 Phase III - Greenway System (Open Space) 17,000 Phase III Greenway Svstem (Trails) $ 15,000 YEAR 4 - Cook Park Roadway Relocation 12,000 Phase IV - Cook Park Improvements (I) 15,000 Phase II - Summerlake Park Parking 50,000 Phase II - Summerlake Park Tennis Courts 16,000 Phase IV - Summerlake Park Improvements (II) 5,000 Phase II - Summerlake Park Fishing Piers 5,500 Fanno Creek Park Landscaping 4,000 Phase IV - Englewood Park Improvements 5,000 1 Phase IV - Greenway System (Open Space) 15,000 Phase IV Greenway System (Trails) CAPITAL IMPROVEPI PROGRAM PLAN k DIVISION DETAIL (CONT.) DEPARTMENTS PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: Operations - Parks (2.1.4) YEAR'5 - Phase V -'Cook Park Improvements (I) $ 12,000 PhaseV Summerlake` Park' Improvements, (II) 35,000 Phase III _-= Summerlake<Park Fishing Piers 5,000 Phase III - Fanno Creek Park_Improvements (I) 18,000 Phase' V - EnglewoodParkImprovements 4,000 Phase V - Greenway System (Open 'Space) 5,000 #. Phase VI Greenway System (Trails) 17,000 t i i a 3;. s l r s r 4E#Y.-J4-N�#�9;M-R4-K-kd3t-3i-i(#�15-i#3�H-DEH;-'k-K-K#i�-tFHiEiEDS3f 3cX-kci(-)i-M-M-#iF`F#FM-�-Di�t#-1E':t-1FiFN�E}F3E#iEH-DS-D4-3E-T(iEM-r`F3:�(TEMi€3(-K-M-tEii-X 35 i SCHEDULE AND FUNDING SUMMARY FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL_ Federal State Park Bond $ 158.250 $__208,000 $122,000 $_112,OOQ_ $ 69,500 $__669,750 Grants $ 131,250 $_68,000- $ 54,000 $ 1500 $ ?_6,500 $ 295,?_50 Developer $ 126,OQO $ $ $ 15,000 $ $ 141,000 T 0 TT A LL S $ 415,500 $ 276,000 $ 176,000 $ 142,500 $ 96,000 $1,10§,OOgO .c k� Y e � 1tly/r R CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN 4• PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COOK PARK BANDSTAND/STAGE DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin River PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park is a regional park 'providing a variety of recreational activities on a .City-wide, and larger scale. Existing facilities include ball diamonds, ;soccer fields, restrooms, picnic tables, sheltered areas, ,playground equipment, and boat launch. A high priority improvement scheduled for Cook Park in FY 84-85 is the construction of a bandstand/stage, for musical and special events. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. rix-x-x-x-x-x-x-�c xx-x-x-x-x-�c-x-x-x-x-x-x�x-x-x-xat-x-x-x x-x-x-x-xx-x-x-x-x�x-x-x-x-x�xx-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-xac-x-x�x-x-x-aux-x-x-�x-x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct bandstand/stage $ 16,000' TOTAL: $`16,000 •xiFEx3Ex-lEx-x-x-x-xi{x-xx-x-DF� F141£•fit-Shit-x-x-x-x-iFi(-x->Ex H-DEQ x x-3Fx-x-x#x-x-x•x-x-xx-�E x-x-x-xk-x-Ycx-x-x-x-x-x-x-DFx-x-x-PEx-1Q-xx-xiHFx SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87=88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $-- $- $ Parks Bond $_ 16,000 $� $ $ $ $ 16,000 T 0 T A L S $ 16,000 $ $ $ $ $ 16,000 JL •2Exili4-ifi bi•kt-x-x'E'k##D4#x-it-x-Y(-x-HI�i-Eta{-M�S#x'#•x-x?t�(iEx#x-x-x-x-x-x9t-x-x#?E34-x-x-x�F-�i(-x-x x#1E-x-x-x-xiE�43Q-x-xx-:E-xit',i•#t-x#�/ OC MARTH 11 SYLVA c MILLE II CT. RENT r+l X11 0 j `/ �W vENwroaT II / 1 1r. EINXAY ROAD„ l.D JEANOa OD. els{� I r.aaaDA .1zi If g 3W ELLNI.N LANE 0�D _ .�� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN % PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COOK PARK IMPROVEMENTS (I) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin f f Rivera variet of PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park is a regional park providing Y recreational activities on a City--wide, and larger scale. Existing facilities t include ball diamonds, soccer fields, restrooms, picnic tables, sheltered areas, playground equipment; and boat launch. Proposed improvements include expanded picnic areas, paved trails, sprinkler system and drainage work. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. ###-Hi4iHE-Dt-14'i#-x-x-x-iii(YE-x�E#iHE�H(-x7t-1E'######x-)E-?Ei4i(-DE�E-x#D(-x�'X-)E-x-x3E'�-Dt-iE#-Df'x��E-x-x-x'x-x-x M'3f-x-M-x•x 2f�E�(-x'x x x�F ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I FY 84-85 Paved Trails $ 5,000 Sprinkler,System 2,500 Picnic Areas 2,500 12,000 Drainage Work 2,000 $ 12,000 Phase II FY 85-86 12,000 Phase III r- FY 66-87 12,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 12,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 60,000 �H H'.(-)F1F•M-DE-DHf-3E'X H-x-x"H x-x-Yt-DE-x-M-x'it x-x-x- ##%DHt-xa4iF#i(-2Fx-x-1t-##;t-x"x-PEx-YFD'.-M�Fx-DF-H-�E Dt x-x-x-x-x-x•x-x-x-�E .. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $—_ $ State $ r $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ g�r�d $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $_ 12.000 $$ 12,000 $$ Park12,000 $$ 60,000 T 0 T A L S $ 12 000 $ 12 000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 60,000 d�t;t�txi........ txx # xnDtiix x;Exxx t' ixxx Dc xxxxicxx aE ii3(##Ex-H-TEi#�f-4{�t-�4it-D4-DE�'crE=a�-1Ei'( �4 AF3E � v •% A i �e. �!' i LOCATIOND. 0�� OURHAN AO. T k u SM COOK/ 5T n {' TaiCT. J IIIAULL \\ SYI.rA. C C r. Kc_Rv ".- ai'i 1 61 YERWO00 w �F.DBlY1Y s ci er. i° ROAD~ Y�rt t L 9i JEP.ROi DI RO.. '. sn g CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK BALLFIELDS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS RESTROOMS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: - Northwest area of City, near Glacier Lily Circle & 130th. ; PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a community-level eds of citizens on a City-wide basis. park, serving the recreational ne Location of a community 'park in the northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic balance to the parks system, and relieve pressures ;of over--.use at Cook -Park. Proposed .improvements include construction of ball diamonds, soccer fields,; game court and restroom facilities. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond, a 50/50 matching grant, r ' and developer dedicated land value. r..s ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construct Ballfields, Grading, Seeding, Sprinkler System $ 70,000 50,000 Restroom Facilities 8,500 Game Court 106,000 Land Value TOTAL: $234,500 xa xHxxx#-x-X**4(Mx�txxxaixxxxxxxxxxx�Exx#K#)ExxxxXxx#H'SUYFx xxxxx�Ex�tx3EitxxkYcxxxM F?E�(xxxYYC SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN'- FY<84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL f Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ City $ $— $ $ $ $ 11,250 Parks Bond $ 11,250 $ $ $ $ $ 117,250 Grant $ 113,250 $ $ $ $ $ 106,000 Developer $ 106,000 $ $ $ $ T O_L 0_LA L S $ 234,500 $ $ $ _ $ $_234,500 i(x x#H 1SiHE?F'1(x 1(rt?ExiHti(1t�f?d 1(#K DE_M#x x?E'}E9(x xx DE K x#)F)F)E?EK t�# YEM 3f x 1( xx 3(x SE 9f SfH M IE�HHFH �� p —:_ _ L $1128 L� -T T ` d, )it't3 s LOW, LOCATION: sn }o k sT. sW. i NJ '0 v; wL1 mI f J' � KARELEAF ;I ST � l OAK `. S:KDLLS J THORN �i eT _ E l LONOSTAffF °1 y Cd! STT \J SW NORt w � NORTH DAKOTA ST'' S gAT- ,@yds+ •;7.•.-1T. 21T � SUKkF.R` ''�,}rt�/ S.W. IGARD 4T. a 9C TY �S�W 6 D :{ by„9CREST DRIVE � \ L'w.•S N SWL � - C' kEx[ ORE ul w al I C n LNS < q TNdGE w A L Fv't gig 101 1 11 dtf �._FALCOM FIf�[E9. - ti 1 3s �* 1 r, ,r+,+� • MEN PRI '19'"`x` ga,•� ''� ! .r , �� 'e %sib ' _ y�•�t • _ 5 • A �lr� t1 � � air�„N. �s� le Y �►�.� ��• '' �iri`,a - g nidi `''�' IS ;s d'@�)I � s �•t titer"a„�} . rs}rku �f JIM Rr �;a�` " r' - ^.s:Lf Y.,:. k;< ...r=Y,�,� 3 „E ? r. •:.. ,a�: tr *x ,.- 8 w. sa�•Wa ",�, 'e ': +r .7:. '..,� .-��, L � - •i'��- +»�`„.�,�k�+£�`t� �+.q.9 �}`+�i x?�+�x t"�Csz�y,�'�Er �'Fv&3�,•r�i��y,,t*.�ar��"4. .y{c�r�h �C ��s. '+st�'%�.,i"*,$;c �,k�r� :.'��t`F'��.� �� s,;'�...^,±C�Sr� '^�="i� s .,•4 r�y. :�s. �� >r 3�. �`i x 0.. :� v. t � � s'�' 'a,s-s,t ' .,�^g�, a��.:�.w,�� _f=� -�.=r�:,�€ss:�,�,,�a .r�t� .;E�,nx�•.r �st r�_�`�;��.vai�i�+s,.,� ,.., r ' CAPITAL I'MPROVENEUT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: 'SUMMERLAKE PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC,WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (I) DIVISION: OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City — near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as -a community-level park, serving the recreational' needs of citizens on a City—wide basis. Location of a community park in the northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic balance to the parks Lsystem, and relieve pressures of over=use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements of land acquisition and paved trails. Probable funding would be from a parks bond and as'conditions of development. �aFx x x�-x-x-�ta�at-x-xat�catt h-M-x-�xx�t-3taHs-x-x x-x x-x-x-x-x-x-x-�t-xx�t-�-x-x#x-tt-x-x-x-x-x�x-x=x-xaQ-x-x-x x-x-x-x-x x�c-x�x-x-x x x x-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Paved Trails $ 20,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 Land Acquisition 75;000 Phase II - FY 85-86 'Land Acquisition 75,000 c I TOTAL: $170,000 �,x" i£�FDE-x�(it K x-?(ii-x:t-x�H4-A'-x-f:#3(if-x-x-x'.E'f3E-M�-x-x-:tx#fiE x-x-x-Df-Mx�'.-x-x-1E-x-x-x-xif-Df-x 3f-x#x-H�#x-x-xDE-2Fx 3E-x-k-D(-x-x iQ-AEx#•#�E x-x �. �. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88_ FY 88-89 TOTAL^ ` Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Cid— $ $ $ $ $ $ Park Bond $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ $_ $ $ 150,000 r Developer $ 20,000 $� $ $ $ $ 20,000 T 0 T A L S $ 95,000 $ 75,000 $ $ $ $ 170,000 i i 33 !a 3a 53 NI I LOCATION: LOCUS !T. ------------- � tln➢LELEAF y 1ST � m � . F SQ 4 I CNOLLS ,� ^R ST OAR N � R ,F s.w. _ e w TnONN'ST NAl/Ri BE3T HI 1. S.W ^ ➢p 0 e,r /_) LONG TA" e V.AM2ANITA t n[ e\ (D /1J \ tl Ci ST. ''i < NCNiN DAKOTA ST Sw NORT sa. I I 1•f. � S SY. n i S TiAHO ST. > 0 'w w I �bF4CP ESI DRIVE M !c TT I I a r Sw D .�,I •Cx[5 011 iw LE IS .. - a a A SR TLNDEIn=a FALCON RIR IOA � S.!'�"` TNCR ?� , -1 I MEOItW n A CL Y ,n ^� R > CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: SUMMEROVEE PARK i IMPROVEMENTS (II) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) x PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City - near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION Summerlake Park ' a community-level to be developed as park,.' serving the recreational needs . of citizens on a City-wide basis, section of the Citywill Location of a community park in the northwest ' . pressures greater geographic balance' to the parks sy,stam, : and relieve P over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include bank protection,' lighting structures and landscaping. Probable 'funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50/50 matching grant. `A-#t'iHE-xrx-x-9(-x-x Df'9t'd-K-Yc-H-x#i#3t#3t-�-x-DtaHtif-}(-x-x-x-x#x#x)t##x-DExiFiE-x#x x-x-x#"x�t-DF#'x)63i-x#-x-}t x-DFx-x�Ht-x xif-x#x'x'x x# 1 ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 10,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 Bank Protection 10,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 Bank Protection $ 16,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 Phase III = FY 86-87 BankProtection $ 10,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 25,000 Landscaping, 4,000 16,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 Bank Protection & Lighting Structures 2 ,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 `Bank Protection, Landscaping TOTAL: $ 92,000 ##'x-x-x-x'x#x-xii#x-3EX M x-x-x•iHf-3t-}EX 3f:E3(-x#x#3(#'K-x-)Fx-x#x-x-x#14#�t�t DE-x':'�x-x-x#)f-H x-x-)('x-l(-x'x-x x-xif DE'x-if-)(x-x"Y.'��E'x-x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88` FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $_ $ $ $ State $ $ $�$ $ $ City Parks Bond $_1—O'000 $ 13,000 $ 17.500 $ 13,000 $ 17,500 $ 71,000. Grant $ $ 3,000 $ 7,500 _3.000 $$ 7500 $ 21 000 $ $ $ T OT A L S $ 10,000 $ 16,000 $ 25,000 $ 16,000 $_25,000 $ 92,000 ik�tit#�t)t+t-3Ex-x-x3E��E3Ex-#x#if�t•it-x-x-x-3t#x-3Ht�t-x-x=2(#�t-X�1t#x-X-x'tiff-DE'EYHtx-�`-xiE�t'�(#�\F�#'�k-Dt>titif�t-?E'k-x�E3E-xM�:-xaE#-x�xi� --- LOCATION. 2 2'4;` Jr !S / SMt .,f'1p IOCQUSJ !T. pEP J• rob AY 3. ST. _ z U jl ! / ♦ , (o t.� qua 4 O sw.--____� it OAK ST 00 +� •v" � P- L� Garoe \9_ V Blvd. SN/.B/Y j NNa S.x. /l `�!" HAW BE !• - - rAp2nNITA 11\ () BT OAICO..I�-_-._ST. NU9TN ARPTA t.. -- = •"1•••,A sw. a #e-�� BINS I Yf RCP(ST V ILa. e REM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FANNO CREEK PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (I) DIVISION OPERATIONS–PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown, Main Street to Hall Blvd. south of Burnham Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION:- Fanno Creek Park tobedeveloped as a community-level park, serving the recreational needs of citizens on a City--wide basis, providing greater geographic balance to the City's parks system, and relieving pressures of over use at Cook Park, Improvements will include foot bridges and 'paved 'trails. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50/50 matching grant, iE-x-x-x�E-x�(-x-x-x-x••x-x-x M•3t-x-x-x�t�-K'k-x-x N-x-x-x-)E-xif-x-jH4-x-x-x x�4#-x-x-x jE-x�E-x-x-�-x#-x-x-x x-x�E-x-IEx-�E-x#j(x-x x-x-3Fx-x-x#x-x x x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I – FY 84-85 Foot Bridges $ °8,000' Paved Trails 10,000 $ 18,000 Phase II FY 86-87 Foot Bridges 8,000 Phase III FY 88-89 Foot Bridges $ 81000 Paved Trails 10,000 18,000 TOTAL: $ 44,000 acxalxxxxxx�txMx�Fxx�Exit3fxxxxx3fxi(x�fxx�txxxlE3f xxxxDtx#xxxxx�cxxx#xxxx#x#xxitxx)ElcxxxxxxxlF SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $— $_ $_ $ State City Parks Bond $ 9,000 $ $ 41000 $ $ 91000 $ 22,000 Grant $ 91 000 $ $ 4,000 $ $ 9,000 $ 22,000. T 0 T A L S $ 18,000 $ $ 8,000 $ $ 18,000 $-44000 �€xr�xxxxxxsc�xxxa�xxa�x-x-xx x�cxxxxxxxxxxx xxr�xxxx xxxx-xxxx\ ��xxxx�c�xxxx?Facx LgI xEAoowST• � N a rw N�TNE `� r I Rv LOCATION: —.9-t- ERRiE ST. �� f K f f` •\ K/fT11ERiM ST�� Y AEP Lt D n r V a^ ! tqO N Sw LY ST. � 3 �v ttYDE5D0.� .A AtMrrT ST,N T SC YG K4YW T. Ai1 . N 5T. 3 W p t,f ST t0 + A s, 3 j` Tr r Sr p s:w, ap yt: 4T? p ,p T acv �� wi..•� � .� e'` u o roT sa � t m Fanno T N GT. i sA MfiN ST SW. FONRE �n GSW. s� 3 9a S.J Creek , WATKR:S SW. ALDERTA sT. SW FONNER ry?, ^w GA NT 4 trot S ST, RG��. pERP.Y LAMES RR. n r- �/.e •p T 3` SW MA IDR '"x"� iw. FANA Si. q, '•, YT / EEO e!t LR .e° /1iEP� a a,. °!o- + T ST. ; .f' - A✓ r�ii. f o4aARA ' \ EoaEw000 ST. k .. _ ft 142 S-10M."o- IN aLO■Wr��R�4It� fro RFROS ! ; WE 5fs F � . ................ . . . n. v.: :ar. �' b r ac_t .4:e s`a .. .k`, ar,: '.'Y.,€i e -""'., -r`,kY'G,'u:.sn:try' i,.` ..t. �:`Y {:'fey- i °.7,+v`, c4s� - =a S'sE. s' .... 't 4X �; < s .. :� 3ha 3w :: .. .. y`., '.�_: afig—, �, ,, y�.:�x-• ..7, sok.-- .� ' ' .. -s sraa� ,. '� ,r. •+psi`-.--,w ,,�,a.� .,.x�.-.ry _.`.�+'.� '�F H- �eF, t��.�-� -�+�i�. a_•-.Y,` i'�-..r 'a tt"fa ` ` `t rs`,-,§`', - 7.u'„'-T,'.-.' 's •};n�„i-. sti�.F`,”- 'k- �.�`'#. `. s� ;r � �3•o'a^�w'.�.arx,'�=, v.;+-s -.c �..a,,n,_. imam CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN t PROJECT DETIAIL PROJECT: ENGLEWOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS u DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City, near Ironwood Drive PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Englewood 'Park is a -large; neighborhood park providing primarily- a natural setting with trails, playground equipment and open spaces. ` Proposed improvements include rebuildingtrails, signing and drainage' work. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. X-X-X-X-Sd x#lE-X#X M-x-X-X-X-x-x-X-X-X#X-x-X�FX-x-x#X-X-XX-X-X3E-X-X)FX-x-X3t x X-X-x X X-Xif X X�(3{X�(-X-X 3(X-x-x-X-X:f-XX 3E X-X if-X-X-X X X# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY -84-85 Rebuild Trails $ ' 2,000 Signing 1,000 Drainage Work 2,000 $ 5,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Rebuild Trails and Drainage,Work 4,000 ' Phase IV - FY `87-88 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 TOTAL: $ 21,000 � X�4-X-k-X-x-X-XiH1-X##X-?t-X-X#x##-X-X-X-X'�E#-X-X#X-?f-X-X-X-x-X-?(-X-x-X#-1t3Ei(-XX-X#-�x-3EX-X-x-x-x-X#if-xX-x-X-X-Xlf-x#�E-X-X#xxx-x•#-X• • SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY '86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ State Cid $ $ $— $- $ $ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 21,000 T 0 T A L_S_ $ 5,0 $ 4,000 . $ 4,000_ $_ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 21,00 3CSHt Z4 bE#'f k X 2#X X$'k#X DFDE F}Ed(ii DFX DEiHf 3t X 1(X X tEx 3t X#SE3E X-*-YM X-X-X•X X X-K*X-X-X-X X-X#X?f x X***X X X X x 3E3c1(lE#X 3E ST: LOCATION: S3-L-o l9 S SY( � LOCDrf ST. ppi i_ .9 SW. i S I MAPLELEAFi.x T. 'e >< 0 K 'ST 5S y2 � (m1CanCD s`1'y ,r .W. E L.TsN„joaN 3T IOMOS-Af'F m ( xAonc'k�TNAtrZAKITA twT) • \ I K u2 ST. �) r, NORTH DAKOTA ST SW NORTH 0lKOj¢-_-ST. R W _ , s _I I .i i suNwE_R. R M is a I I Soy (`J`/JO <W. TlOARD ST' �ERCR£ST DRIVE TX" p w SW L0 LEWIS .n+R �'I •ata[ One W[ yt t LM. .. - WMA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN t PROSCT DETAIL PROJECT: JACK PARK RESTROOM REPAIRS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) of City, north of Walnut Street, between PROJECT LOCATION: West–central area 124th & 127th. PROJECT' DESCRIPTION: Jack Park is a neighborhood park serving primarily local residents .with open space, -lawns,' playground equipment, restroom facilities, and lighting, Proposed improvements include paved trails, sprinkler system, repair of the often vandalized restroom facilities. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. . ....E . #-x=,f'�t-H-x##jd-N-x#�E-Fi-x x-x-x-x-x-x->H4-3f x-x-x-x#3f-x-x-H�f'�Fx-x#�E-x-x##iFx•x'x-x'�('d-x#?i�f-x'34-?F#'x-x-x-x-x-�('�F'�x#x'�t-x-x-x-x-x'x�(-x# j a ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 3,000 Restroom Repair } 3 TOTAL: $ 3,000 - �'x-x-x-x'�-x-x-x-x-xai-x'�-x-x-xxx'�-xtt-x-x'�E-x-�-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x�-x-x'x��-x'xaF#�-x-x-x-x�'x-x-x-x-x-x-x':�-x'�•��-x-x'x'x�c#x-�c-x'��'x-x-� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ — $— $ $ $ — StateCity 3, — $ Parks Bond $ 3,000 $ $ $ $ $ 000 T 0 T A L S $ 3,000 $ $ _ $ $ $ vv 3,0�0t0 ��F'x DEx x"M x x3E�f'Ni M DFK x#x#X x x BS�x 3�#31 Ix DE Y�/. #x H'n iT/x DF'x'x x�(1fYE6xjEOU 'M Lj A LAY i LOCATION: „l i • rL. p Kal'k'fr ST��. t6 . � C y NAK O,p I sr.� ST. X11 �5 n t� ^�. « < � ,�. `r4` � Jr bk b ..Lls �• .cG KER''n ti9 anno �fi•� y�'/d.. L S.W 1• < GRRM.N Sr NT <-YIATKN5 �, w y;►t Creek J SW "'RERIA 5T. _PL f.b •Y•N Park -r• C�,P� EONRE % Sew.. GR NT 'fC Vl*ti a? ♦ {i �.. 4e1. O KK r R y C i / � pf ,P• � � A'� - ;1 0/y 4' � oNJ� ~\]7 O �JJ T1/Iy\. �. Nil 111111 LN. J� yA V CY 1 ~ J i 1 s d p'Aad P w, o4laee _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT';DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (OPEN SPACE) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) ; PROJECT LOCATION: City—wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The greenway system is an interconnected area of natural open space encompassing the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries. The greenway system provides for preservation of the natural drainage system, Passive recreation 'and, pedestrian/bicycle travel. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. -§H8#it-PQ-I23t-DFIE•x�-?;�S-St ..pE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I — FY 84-85 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection $ 5,000 Phase II — FY 85-86 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase III — FY 86-87 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection' 5,000 Phase IV — FY 87-88 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection` 5,000 Phase V — FY 88-89 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 TOTAL:' $25,000 M x'�t pd Yc t4iHiit#M #EEH 3EM H SSM`Q K?�M H M H#M}E 3E 343{3H*X x x H Di X DE?E 1tiE?FM 34 f H M %YI Df bHE4Ex)t x 3k SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $$� $$ $ $ State $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $___5,Ooo $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 _T 0 T ALS $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $___5,00_0 $.-_ 5,000 $ 25,000 3F?f•36-AE�f-�-M-k34-x-2€3ii4iQit-xi6- , . -X•3E36-)Eit-###-➢d-Nr-1tx�H€-p4ifi;i.-DEif-Jf3&-x-iHt-1i•M-i4:: •i-.i•,�i#-x�4�f-YF LOCATION: CAPITAL ImpRovEmEnT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (TRAILS) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) , PROJECT LOCATION: City—wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The greenway system is an interconnected area of natural open space encompassing the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major } tributaries. it is the intent of the City to expand and connect existing segments of bicycle/pedestrian trails in the greenway, into a unified 'trail network. Proposed improvements include property identification, land acquisition/easements ;and trail construction. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and a 50/50 match grant. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I — FY 84-85 Property Identification $ 5,000 LandAcquisition/Easements 2,000 Trail Construction 10,000 $ 17,000 Phase II FY 85-86 Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Phase III'`-- FY 86-87 Property Identification, Trail Construct 17,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Phase V — FY 88-89 Property Identification, Trail Construct 17,000 TOTAL: $ 81,000 3E-x�t-� n�•�-x-�•�;ria-��•za-x-�-�t-x�-x�t-x-�c�-x-x-at-x-�c-zEx tt •x-�-�-x-�c-x�€•x-x•�-x-:t-x-x-tt-x-x�t-�-x-x••�-�t x•�c•�-x ~ SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-0. F`! 87-88 FY '88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ -- $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $. 12,000 $� 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 56,000 Grant $ 5,000 $$ 5,000 $$ 5,000 $ 5,000 5,o0o $$ 25,000 T 0 T A L S $ 17,000 15,000 $ 17,000 $ 15,000 $ 17,00 $ 81,000 ,� xic�Fs�c-x-x-x�xx-af•�-six-��tt-x-��-x-x-�x• LOCATION: FIR RIA ��. �'.['E.r.;e,►y' �i� � `jam - `- � , �• ��re7 ��3 .. . �# 'Rv,��}�/��, e � ?7*,,^.• j7nlY�'Si�S ., •��1.ys � a`t.�`i� �'� �1§2� - �s=��'x•E �`�i i ��p i -�,ys,^fir, S + x k � 31_, r• t �f 't _oqc' f s -gQ. '��,y_s.- ••6;R y � � �Y�- r �R J R. �..��w3iAt�1�..," �'' ♦�.��+'1� ��,y�"j, a'*<. m.' "t Js•. +��0'e`J t(� ,.: ie `; `'+,.o..�.t�• r�.•n ;�,¢•� .F,�y. �ay_i„-'2y��,+��F•'"+}��l"n>t;. ,�y �'F k ------------skF�v Ci�i'i��t°i..2z��'i`w�+��"'z�4�_.•;...e�.^.�,�z``.�,_yj,�k 3._ '.,._K•+��"r1�,•�r,.#�_.;,i'�,?s.."'ttx+.qr:�d^+•E:7�t:�.•..�+.�,.�.�.Tt�--�fi"�.=-F+-l-,t,,.�.s..v_....,.;��s.,'�+�:5r,�yk,�s-�_S.:...--,kuH��.,,2'�`�.,".v-`e r�za�.$-�"r+rte-:�°...,_k}"�w?5G'�.«t''".':..:�j��.,'�-zc,i_..-m-�r''`,-�.,:'r..��&�.,.A::ti��`rsx�`"'.se}i''-`.�t.�I^-s3-,-t...',.�--''ff�-,i.+T.,.o i,t��'�.�.u•..-'�1•`cF,�s..'.y'��Lc'`r3�?"4i�`-.�. _a,`3_S':+r'.eR9:''}v`�°''f.{�-�.s..N�.tz:�5.e:s.-..'.r.v-��„'S>k��s`�3�`�..,ac"sc'Yl.S�:e�y�;>�,�,,•x:�E,'�_ua.-,'`.t*ti-:”�."�>"3%f.,��ta".�s3.�e.._.��w k`�yu-`r'e":1.T.,".�i.�,�,m�S�11l�4S4'.i�.''��a"�s�z�i,,":-�i�"�'4,isi-.,rt.,tsr�•.',.;,"��'i.'q`•§'�?:•wBR._i.:-`..,Yf'''f�'�,*--�4'd,r'�,1�,s z,;*SyS""-+i.�',e'r..'ts,.+3,3i'F4_Y..':-f�'3�y�!u=:�=-,:4.?�tT.�'�7.S�•'"�7s`�r'"r17��;�2.4. Q.{^ A0` ��1_ "� N+ ,n 'a'll `�"`..•f`'��, ��'t�,S�. g?;=t'<:.. --- � r- .� .< �A .,. �_ �_ ,y �� . � , CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: COOK PARK IMPROVEMENTS (I) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin River -wide, and lamer scale. Existing facilities PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park is a regional park providing a variety of recreational activities, on a City restrooms, _picnic tables, sheltered include ball diamonds, soccer fields, areas;: playgroundrequipment, and boat launch.- Proposed improvements include paved 'trails, sprinkler;system_ and drainage work. expanded picnic areas, Dt�o(vHSEd H parks aHr'i kjHtboMnH d. ding would be from an appr E KH't'EH 3diE H# # H x HS Probable fun ESTIMATE OF .PROJECT COST: E $ 5,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 Paved Trails 2 500 Sprinkler System 2,500 Picnic Areas 2,000 $ 12,000 Drainage Work 12,000 n Phase II FY 85-86 12,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 12,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 12,000 Phase V FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 60,000 -H-H-34.34#-Ki(-3(-H3(H-DFH'H'#'H34#'H-H-3E•H' y �r 343E-3EH-H-3Ek3E#i4Hi(ifH34-MH-H3(-Hi(-H-H#3EH3F3E#H-H-H-'k3EH-H-H-H#H-HH-H-3(H-H##-H-H-H-3F4E-H-H#'rE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 84-85 FY 85-85 FY 86-87 FY 8 7-8g FY 8_8-89 Federal $_--- $ $ $---- $----"-- State $ __-_-- $ $ $ $ --------'-- --�'__ 6Q 000 , q i ty-�— $--—-- } Pat 6C Bernd $ 12,000_ $ 1 0 $ 12 000_ $$ 1_2 000_ 12,000 $�- 12 000 12,000 60000 T 0 T A L S $ 12 0 $ 121000- S 12 000.- $ , _ $ _ $ H-H-H-H3E-H-343E OC -H-}EDE-M-H-DE3(3E3(-H-3E3434'/E;f3'c1d-34-DFY-3EiE3H4-3E#34-#iE-X34-HiEH•H-H-H- 1 � 1 I ,. l/ } #•iF3E�E•3E�-H3f�3E3E3E'3(3E3Ei1iEH'3( � i I� �i q s 64-3• °J ° �.j �' M1e Q u D , o RwFb VL CJc a MILL SYLVI ^$� Sr exRY J\ _ of {� 1 eRnorau MIX. Rano„ 1 � :, r. • �fi. ,keM 1 a °irw � 'Cr a no 7-1 a i CAPITAL` YPiPROifEMENT PROGRW PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS 4 DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT: SUN�IERLAKE PARK Circle and 130th IMPROVEMENTS (I) - near Glacier Lily level PROJECT LOCATION: 'Northwest area of City a City-amide basis. ;4 Summerlake Park to be developed as a community- PROJECT DESCRIPTaON: needs of citizens on will provide park, serving the recreational i ark n thneedsnorthwest section of the City res sures of :Location of a community p arks systom, and relieve p ' paved greater geographic balance to the p over-us e at trails, :Park. - Proposed improvements of land acquisition and p it- tralls: development. T would be from a parks bond and' as conditions of Probable funding att<-x'it-xxx-xxat'x'�cx�x �xV �#atx�tx�t�tx'xx' xx�cx c'x�t irolE�Eblex-xi43Edir Xx�1xxaEil'x�taSatDEx'rfx''��t1E'xxxx � ESTIMATE OF 'PRO7ECT COST: $ 20,000 z FY 84-85 Paved Trail Phase I s 75,000 75 000 Phase I FY 84-85 Land Acquisition � Phase II - FY 85-86 Land Acquisition $170,000 TOTAL: #'xxxx ,-xxxxx�tx�t�cxStatxxace� CHEDULExAND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL A -. FY 86-87 FYI FY 8__---- FY 8 85 FY 85-86 - k Federal— $---- state $---—--- $ — state_ $ _-- — $-------- $ 150,000 p2000 City 75,000_$ 75 000 Park Bond $ 20 000 $ _------ $ Developer $_-- — $--'_____-___. $ $ 170.00® L S $ 95,000 $ 75,09-0- $__-_--_----- $- T G T A a(}FxxDExl�x+tXD N,r+' irn•iT-xa'•C'lt- '�t-iM1z'T �� IOLUtn yL. • ](-nx`Ia"I"i]r.'fCR'!�/'PC',�T,+-jt'T.'./T� � � , ],)1 ��/�{ lior LOCATION: PP. mG n.9EEECRt s•, / � � �� f �� -° Y .,,, ��'Y \ ,. . -«,c•Jse.Hf 1 sM N�� \ - " i3r..:,�«s•\1 n • 2 IT4.11 F_� RSO 41C&7.�9E Sp KJhI ry ]•Y Hsr. sl '-�� cr4-..7 .. - ��pR,.•pRTH RMOtA T s !! r: r w i'a $• i 'y!u' :.2,t Q�-�a•,•\. g,p, buuvER LI-IS .�' dti6gC0E]' uR4iv•/'/'/� n �� fl vE o s It 1 ,y+ ? — E � Yf Nf a. JS �I,T ]a �� 11 � E�w! •.../\J L! CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN S - PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERL'AKE PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (Ii) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214),, PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City - near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summer^lake Park :to be developed as a community-level park, serving the recreational needs, of citizens on a City-wide basis. Location of a community park in the northwestsection of the City will provide greater geographic balance to the parks system, and relieve pressures of over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include bank protection, lighting structures and landscaping. [ Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50150 matching grant. iHf x Yc TQ Yc#Pd x 3Q�t x#3Q H x #�(�f'E3E3f H H M�(M Hi(x x H#i x x�(H x�t x H x lE�t-)fit x x#H x j(it HiHQ 3FH H H3# x H H x x D(H x H-x-.X-x x x x_* i x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Bank Protection $ 10,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 Bank Protection $ 10,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 16,000 € Phase III - FY 86-87 Bank Protection $ 10,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 Landscaping 9,000 25,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Bank Protection & Lighting Structures 16,000 Phase V FY 88-89 Bank Protection, !sighting, Landscaping 25,000 TOTAL: $ 92,000 i ***X**"-x-K****-Xx-x-(H3t}E#HiEii1EHx�EKiE F# xHHHxiEi()Eft#x3E14HfEHx3EHHHxxi(3txH1QHxYExD�xHi(3tHtt)EHx SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85=86 FY 86-87' FY 87-88 FY-88-89 TOTAL ` Federal $_ $ $ $_ $ $ State $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 10,000 $ 13,000.... $__17,50Q__ $ 13,000_ $ 17,500 $ 71,000 j Grant $ $ 3,000 $ 7,500 $_ 3,000 $_ 7,500 $ 21.000 P $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 10,000 $ 16,000 $ 25,000 $ 161000 $ 25,000 $ 92,000 k yyry ��♦ y��yy /� ,y� y �/ { yyy �y,yy y�yy a/ {y. ,: x'ia R x'd�{lrh R l 9(M i n�i}iE rx3EiE K F x I\iE R#"{`x34'x",Y{x"H'H x 4 H H#343`H H R x x Hsi Y a T'!xi(IcH x x do li Yl it M DS x 3f H t\!)S M d"i� L.�ST:�.�Y LOCATION: :r T+� k _ _ d.� IOCL•Jr •ST i Y Li,21 Cd .0 � HU x � ~LEL r ai ST �k \♦ ! 1P1 0 F --------------- }T____ Sc 3Y. 6aK . j! NaKll$Bea fk._ r of k2aro11A �� f I � , wC:tSn g}� w ti NORTH nAfl4TA TAT .ST. I Baa sear '•sari sa t, ' k CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: ENGLEWOOD PARKIMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City, near ,Ironwood Drive PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Englewood Park is a large neighborhood park providing primarily a' natural setting with trails, playground equipment and open e - spaces. Proposed improvements include rebuilding trails, signing and drainage work. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. ldit#D(#-X-X-X•X=�S-DE#74#X-X-X#?.`X#�(-X�E�i-#-X-X•X-X-P-X X-#�-X-X#-X-k X-M-X#iE-�EXi(-X3{-X#-X�i44diHi##-X#-Y-1E M-X X-X--IE#X-X-DEDE#M-M3t# Y' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: r ± Phase I - FY 84-85 Rebuild Trails $ 2,000 � Signing 1,000 2 -000 $ 5,000 Drainage Work 4,000 Phase Ii - FY 85-86 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase ,IV - FY 87-86 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase V - 'Fy 88-89 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 2 TOTAL: 1,000 � a'i'#-?E-IDt-X-Y:#-3E#-YcX-Y(-X9Q-X3ti{-X NI##-)F##•�(#iEiEM-X-X-X-X H-X�E-X-X-X-X H-X-3(#Dt-?FX-X-M###-X�(-X#�(-X dt-Xii•�-X-X#iH4#-X-'4#X3(-X-X�2-?(�t-� �. t ' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN x FY 84-85` FY 85-86- FY:8b-87 FY 87-88FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $$ State $ $ $ City $ Parks Bond $ 5.000 $ 4,o0a $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $$ 4,000 $$ 21,000 $ $ $ — $— $ $ $ $ $_ k; T 0 T A L S $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $_-4--,000 $ 4,o0fl $ 4,000 - $ 21,000 4 -Df-14if-X-ki(-3t•X•#:Edi-3f-?fiEi(H'lEX#X'iQit"X-3cn-�:;'; ? 'F'X•3fiSiEit-St-X-3(-X-X-X-XDt#�t-PEIt-X-X-X-O(#1E-X-XiE•X-Y.-X-Ef#-X•�`-i'�t#Fi�3E#it'DE•iEiEFt-X�E•if'�t - �fl'. I� sT. a'' E � LOCATION: , =+=s pl' � ;r ab 35 LOWS• 1 i Si f LpTi L 4 L9J Sm A.al •� G K { �'\ i. :♦ 90 !' Sw—__.._- OAK ST r e } �IC'Y1>: Ev •�� jl`7 l.G � •6 ..a.Y of.. 1\i Br.v., gMA�A ' hc4be �a �, .'y $},_ `-'1 �✓� n• \s S W. ..,.` i TM')AX'Sr. LOb6}Td17 c '{,. Bdwl(�S BE - � tllB;lMIT! 1 � � ►� �Sf lT d t!°_• at. ST'i� Sp !{�� a R'h'Sr t NORTH dKOTA 'l: 21t I •1' S... ea s SBI. n r i i (� A nT.. l � ancsaa s;. .,I LriAOKF.}T IAItl� J - LlMIa ) £W L 4. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (OPEN SPACE) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The_greenway system is an interconnected area of natural open ' space encompassing the f'loodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries. The greenways system provides for 'preservation of the natural drainage system," passive recreation and pedestrian/bicycle travel. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. j`c#iFbEif-x-%i'E-x-3(-iEE&S-tt-PiiFX')d-R-bf�{-".(�£-x-x-'+t-M-BEM#DFDEx�fiE-x-x-Yi-Yc-�',l-x-x-3fxE4jExii-)4-x-x-DY-'t#1tif-x-x-x-Ycitd-x#x#�X3t-irrcn n-icx:4if-1E ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection $ 5,000 Phasic TT FY `85-86 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase IV — FY 87--88 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase V -- FY '88-89 'Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 TOTAL: $25,000 ` iE)(-4tH:-x-Bt=t4-xi(-BEA'-YEBi-x-Dt-E4-B('#iFY4=d-BFk-x- IEBEBE#�C3ti4-x#xiEx-BE-BEx-BEit-x-x)Fx-M-x-D1-DQ-}Ei4 � SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Cites $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $_5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 T 0 T A L S $ 5,000_ $ 5,000 �_ 5,000 $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25 000 ��-DE-#=�Q-2i-B'c1�-#3B-BE�FB£-Pt-x-DS'.fit-Pf�-'�f-Y:-)EBF;t-x-uic�r3E',(x-Bt-x iE3E# -x-u-)Ei£-x-x3t-x-3f-kx-YH�IE�f-ki-xif#'/S-B'.;40t-)f#x-M-D:-)E�ci4##'et-x�t-MaHE LOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWRY SYSTEM (TRAILS) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide y PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The greenway system is an interconnected area of natural _ open space encompassing the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major , tributaries. It is the intent of the City to expand" and connect existing segments of bicycle/pedestrian trails in the greenway, into a unified trail network. Proposed improvements include property identification, land acquisition/easements and trail construction. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and a 50/50 match grant. 3f x xa€3i x x It x Bg x x x xtit x#x x�t x-*Ht-x xiE3s x x x x 3i3t x3iiE TQ x it x x xi(�F#x x x k x x x xiFx#it x YEit3t)f x xit x�c#i(x 3t x x x#x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 04-85 'Property Identification $ 5,000 Land Acquisition/Easements 2,000 17,000 Trail Construction 10,000' $ Phase II - FY 85-86 Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Property Identification, Trail Construct 17,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 :Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Phase V FY 88-89 Property Identification, Trail Construct 17,000 TOTAL: $ 81,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL. Federal $ _ $ $ $— $ - $ State $ $ $ $ — $ - $ City $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 12,000 $ 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 10,000 $ 12,000 $ 56,000 Grant $ 5,000 $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,00J $ 5,a0a $$ 25,000 T 0 T A -L S $ 17,000 $ 15,000 $ 17,000 $---1-5-,0-00 $ 17,000 $ 81,000 LOCATION: ' .....tea y HOMER n 9 CAPITAL IMPROVEME T PROGRAM PLAN j i I ' PROJECT DETAIL E PROJECT: COOK PARK BALLFIELDS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS C DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) .' PROJECT LOCATION: South—central area of City — 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin River PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park is a regional park providing a variety of � recreational activities on a City-wide, and larger scale. Existing 'facilities include ball -'diamonds, soccer 'fields, restrooms, picnic tables, sheltered areas, playground equipment, and boat launch. Proposed improvements include ? the constructionof ball diamonds and soccer fields. E. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and a 50150 match grant. #i+�i4;f M#DEif#H X}tiEX##M Dt#iQ�EHHE�4 .............. If HSE X XiQ X lE�HEYni i.n R r"H X#PE#i()E X Xit?(I4 Hsi X ##�Cii X k#it 7H i€?EDE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construction of Ballfields Grading $ 30,000 .Sprinkler System 20,000 Backstop 15,000 Seeding 5,000 , TOTAL: $ 70,000 #3,-�(=+t-Sf-X-)HEXiENi2�HEii-P{#X'XiElEi�-#�E•�1-`rF'3d -)(-X-THHEii-?E###-X-9H£-M-X�(-X�EiE-DE-Df#�EXaS M-lE-X-Xi:-icic�cii i-XiEX-iQ#DEX H-Df-�?Q•X-Bf 3E-1E F; w SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN r FY 84-65 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-85 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ $ 35,000 $ $ $ $ 35-000 Grant $ $ 35,000 $ $ $ $ 35,000 -- i T• 0 T A L S $ $ 70,000 $ $ $_ $ 70,000 �rnm'°-'r`.-is-i:#Df-1E°C�,E�E-A4 Df-i�M-kf-DFTt-SE#iEi!-?Q-1E'hiE-7E�HE'X-h-:t-X-:It-'r�.-3E•Yc?EiE�'{-Xai-n=�,ricic-ic��'cru.-x�HliE$t-tCi(i(iCBi-PHE LOCATION; M Ni 1 i <. RHA `v DURHfat W. / t•�t _ (_� � � R0. _" � NAR_ i: .�'C �•� x P 4 S.w C / SL� SJR e J SYLYA A PILL �qJ 11 OT IF .• tet. n nr R u�j{ �g7A0mJAY . I V E3H �� At ! U •' ••• yPr��i(}',6.LV<< Ga qi EY/ AlY flkDLtY ROAD dfAN I S1 $ N , roar cn A 11 IN CAPITAL IMPROVE4EFJT_PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE'PARK TENNIS COURTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS -(214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City - near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to; be developed as a community-level park, serving' the "recreational needs of citizens on a City-wide > basis. Location of a<community park in the northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic %balance to the parks, system, and relieve •pressures of over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include construction of tennis courts, fencing, and lights. Probable- funding would be from a 50/50' match grant and as conditions of *development. �i-3t-�-X -IQ-�#%ii-Dt3E H-�-�#Di#�-x-�-M-7Q-xiE�(-x-k-•��{-M�tiEif-M-K-?Fx'�i-x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I FY 85-86 Tennis Court Construction Grading & Lighting $ 15,000 Surfacing & Fencing 35,000 $ 50,000 Phase II - FY 87--88' Tennis Court Construction Grading & Lighting $ 15,000 Surfacing & `Fenc'ing 35,000 $' 50,000 TOTAL: $100,000 •ttia.�hD�4-x-xid•:HHE#3E�F3(-x-2{-MzYi4-H-#iFx-�-�)i-H-Mi(-�-x-K•#�F�(X�-)t-?E###iE�31-YHA-•bE#-1F-x-fit-K-M-#fit-3E#�(-�tt3¢-x•#3FM �- SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 _ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $_ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $� City $ $ $ $ $ $___ Grant $ $ 35-,,000 $ $ 35,000 $ $ 70,000 Developer $ __ $ 15,000 $� $ 15,000 $ $. 30,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ 50,000 $ $_50,000 $� $ 100,000 if3S34.3£- Y:•DS-M-3F-H-�. •�cii`,iiricaiic�-n -M�-X-If-:S-H-H•➢iX-113SiE LOCATION: t yI )L-cK -Lwa&J LA_:g,.=.� ]]-{]A \ �¢ J4'4 / f.H •'; l0{US1 fL � Y II, S AF °+ n sr. OLL OIL s � a IGtaC .. T_ e ... seN.. \. o sHAm mA p!i��r �� \ $.M. -�• 6 TIIOIISI'LS 1 p)1, SYf. �N. i NAT (. IOPof TAPI o YimH�fEAf& ¢.� e MR ANITA , ` (q Ra _�✓ a �q p lr S "MT0 AHOtA A 4 A4Kpt ti T7 m, TI1 - zd. 'I •�� .�:iCC ,.. s SUN."•' el+.x A•, w. sS S.M. Yt'SARO f4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FANNO CREEK PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (II) DIVISION: OPERATIONS–PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown, Main Street to Hall Blvd. south of Burnham Street PROJECT 'DESCRIPTION: Fanno Creek Park to be developed as a community-level park, serving the recreational ; needs of citizens on a City–wide basis, providing greater geographic balance to the City's parks system, and relieve pressures of over use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include lake grading, open space grading and land easements and acquisitions. Probable 'funding would be from an approved parks bond and as conditions of development. #3t�fxi H��3�k14-M-D`M-x3i`x��-x '�-�-x�"�4#-xit#x-M-x•iHH(�-x-xi:-x-2Ex�E#%�HEiE'�••iH((SHE'x#x�(iFxiE-x-xit-x�i-?Ht-x�iE#'iE-x-tEDt ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Grading of lake area $ 10,000 Grading of open space areas 5,000 Land acquisition and easements 5,000 TOTAL: $ 20,000 - �%Yc�F-:c�t-x-x-xit-x3E#-D�P(-3E',f-x#x�Eii-x-Dfi 3E-)t-x-x-?F�4-x-Dt-M-x•x-x-xiEi(-x-x�t-1¢-)t-1f-x-)EM-x-YC-x-x-3S-x-x�f-xx'�f-NHi-��-tFx�-H-3Fx-x'#-x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN "FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY.88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $_ $—_ $ $___1_0_1 000 Parks Bond $ 10,000 $ — $ 10 000 $ $ $ $ lo, Developer $ — $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ $ 20,000 $ $ $ $ 20,000 atxacx}Eaaxx , a xxxxxxxxxx � �n xxx q�rHegs x'x-x-M'H-JEx'?FxiEx-DF mu,w3f. LOCATION: / ` "i �U EFlM�IT KAF IT. 3i 3i. IT, SW.AMF ST. tlA' 6W, N V <<f�• '`/ ,� ST X11 ;16 ' • - .Sl. �, / r °¢Tjfw� }2'y \.. �..�LAI a "A.EF ST. So. -S.W. d 59 y. Creek i Ja �.• AI� �1n SW IWiqq � .A T� .(..• M s l `tom s W. lA1hE! R6 /`� � •5-�/ PAF � ' � r r e/ � e• 14 ?O P• �t 1 ST. M ! %/• !m. CSNFA iw. FSIF / �! / .p ♦ ffr fCSrwCCC !T. D 1RtSN pP. A. Azi x P cT se3F a W. CAPITAL IMPROVOWWT PROGRAM PLAN E PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: JACK PARK TRAILS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: West—central area of City, north of Walnut Street, between 124th & 127th. primarily local PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Jack Park i s a neighborhood park serving p Y - residents' with open 'space,, lawns, playground equipment, restroom facilities, paved trails, 'sprinkler system, and lighting. Proposed improvements include the construction of trails. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. �-x-x x�t-x-x-x�x�x-xaa-x�c-�cx x x-x�c-x x-x-mac-x-x-x-x• ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 5.000 Construction of Trails TOTAL: $ 5,000 x-x_x-x-x-�x�c�a-x--x-xaE-xa�-x-x-x-x�c x-x�t�c-x�-x�c�-x-x-x-x-x-x�-x-x x-x-x-x-x-x�-x-x-x-x•x-x�-x-x-x�-x-�x�-�-x-x-x-x x=,�;c-x-x�-x-x-x-ic�x� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85--86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ City $ $ 5,000 Parks Bond $ 51000 $_ $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S ,$ $ 5,000 $ $ $_ $ X000 -rc-xaax�.,c-x� �u-x-x�x-x-a��-x•r�x-x-x x-x-x-x-x-aux-x�xac-��x�-x Via,x-?�-x• x-�x-x• � ST. � LOCATION: KAu CT / 90 k y� ' (yy IIri.ANR ST. i yAc.Ml: 6M� 4 P V %P �� 4 C 3 y''a F��E ra C...—.—.—.—. ►4 �' a rA _�I C 5T S.M. ST SYI. K a/r Gzw. 3 SS -� Park Creek a CARMEN `-M�A.MKKB M yJh. SM. ALBERTA ST. 4 J� S (T S.M PCKKEa Sw NT 'F` �•+�y �. 09 .�s6 T. it .7"'. - /l• 'f� C : i 1 LR. t / S •P P t � IIT. •�.' d�� s � � r /. rq� M'� �s � /Sa �k l e� y,•' S.M HOSEx00D ST. I B ' l !� fRw.WKEM s Y.ca. M , CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: WOODARD PARK FENCE DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214') PROJECT LOCATION: Central area of City, between Katherine St. & Johnson St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Woodard Park is a neighborhood park serving primarily local residents with open space, lawns, " trails, lighting, and playground : equipment. Proposed improvements include construction of a fence along sections of park perimeter. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. Hit 3H(H DETHHE,T x x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construction of Fence $ 4,000 TOTAL: $ 4,000 �,� tE•H-H-H#H-x-H-H#H-H-3E-H#H-H-1t-31-H-H#H#x-�H-H�E�-H-H3f#x#H# -H#DE?E H-H-1H(-H-H#H-H# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87` FY"87-88 FY 88-•89 ` TOTALS' Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ _ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ ___ Parks Bond $ $ 4 000 $ $ $ $ 4,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ 4,000 $ $ $ $ 4{OOQ . 3t'H'PHt'I�'YE�E�E�']{-IIT N NKXTHE � r�7 �1 aEADGWT 'W LOCATION: /. ��••• 1 O 5.4 1.1� sa ET m 4 = sw e~R N 44q sfE.fNN sT. WEINN EWA RI S �/ SM. N^ T nVE cll _ a i.^ r c y,/ a- T• aPE G, 0 T.. e sT. Ear. f NEN' N � � ♦ 99 Fann+n �4 ERNMLq E.Z w y+4 CCCCIC SPL R t sw, nLEE?iR T. Vl r4 per. Pack ',d•.. '�/r�r. �i/ ,•aes AO. � Ne � oeA� A �cooa +*Aa 9O�' �c�ot `<+� a��y. •f /, iT � � d •s �� ;� Ea. +'�/e'�a� �r Cr( 'ctrl T. ~`• < A �/ f � KI1 i t 4� OT y'r/ V EXI. O;BARN `((\/(y�\\\ S.W. P¢yt � �F� � /T gip. 3~ SH EOEEM'000 ST. 4 F s D e 4 e g�fB CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN E. PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COOK PARK IMPROVEMENTS (I) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin River PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook` Park is a regional park providing a variety of recreational activities on a City.-wide, and larger scale:. Existing facilities include ball diamonds, soccer fields`, restrooms, picnic tables, sheltered areas, playground equipment, and boat launch. Proposed improvements include expanded picnic areas, paved trails, sprinkler system and drainage work. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. �iEiFM-DfiH4it�•M�4it#M-M-x-K-l(#-Tf-�-�'xif-IE-M-3i-H•####-DFx#iE-H-##x-H x-�E-###DE#-D4•)i-YF#it#-##-3E74-M-D(if•#"#i(-#-x#iE-M-x H###-x x x MiE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Paved;Trails $ 5,000 2,500 ' Sprinkler System Picnic Areas 2,500 Drainage Work 2,000 $ 1 ,000 12,000 Phase II FY 85-86 12,000 Phase III '- FY-86-87 12,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 12,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 60,000 #K#itx)t3HE#ifdH(xtt3ExiHExx##x#-x-DHt-X**-K-x-x-x-x-X -x*xxxx�ixlE#xItxxxux#XDHtK* DtxMit-Yxx-xH##-K-"-X**4t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ - $ $----- $ State $ $ $ $ $ City $ Park Bernd $ 12,000 $$ 12.000 $$ 12,000 12,000, $$ 12,000 $$ 50,000 T O T A L S $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $_ 12,000 $ 12,00o .. $ 12,000 $ 60,000 -M-K=r1-M•�?t-M-14-x�'E-3t-M-1f#-�t-K-K-K-K-3t'rF#-�E-fE#itK-KK-XaS-?tit-K-K-M-K-�N-M-K•M3t�EK-M• LOCATION:��7 _ =•! ° �� RD Poe �( V� _ Dom`-- r �j • r fi1+5.1 f 1 IF � .. sv T. wav � uA A CE J WILL SYLVA e SII CT ¢NT ;;H 01 1 AU. 'y`.�'Dj�4"1. o'r,b SPC A• MUU4 �r-- 1 •1•t>• �—•�� i!F4'vi' (sa6dt tw f 5W - Qfg 6 ,� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL " PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS i IMPROVEMENTS (tI) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT' LOCATION: northwest area of City- near' Glacier Lily Circle and -1130th City-wide basis. r PROJECT' DESCRIPTION: SummerYa e Park needs tobeb citizenevels a City-wide community-level nark, serving the recreationalwill provide Location of a community park in the northwest sectio ntlf the relieve y pressures of greater geographic balance to the`, parks system, over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include bank protection, ' lighting structures and landscaping. roved parks bond and from ' a 50/50 {, Probable funding would be from an approved matching grant. ' #-HCH£-H-H-Hof-H#•Hir-)F#-H-X-?f-H#-H-X-H-YF#-iE3Hr#-H#-1Ht�#-%-M-%H.#9f-%H-#-H'3E D(-3E x-H H-H-HH-X-H###H-%-%-H-H-X-M'%-H-%-%-H H i4-?E#-X X X H-YF �: i ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 10,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 Bank Protection 10,000 )' Phase 'II -"FY 85-86 Bank Protection $ 16,000 Lighting Structures` 6,000 ; 10,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Bank Protection res $ 6,000 Lighting 9;,000 25,000 Landscaping Structures 16,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Bank Protection & Lighting Landscaping 25,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 Bank Protection, Lighting, $ 92,000 TOTAL:#-HH-3EH-SEH-}E#-H�t-H-PFX-3i�F-IE-H-%#-H-XiF#-H-X#-3Eif-%Hi(-Y.H#H-H-•�H#K-HH#iEH�t-H-X-H#�lEkH-X-H-H-X-%-X•#-H1E#-H-xH%tElf-XH-Hi('�tifH-X .. SCHEDULE ANDFUNDINGPl. ,TOTAL FY 8_4-85_ FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 F Federal - State $- $ $_ $ s City_----- $------- $ Parks Bond $ 1Q 000 $ 13 000 $ 1 057 0 $_13 040 $ 1__ 7 500 - $ 21 000 $ 3,000 $ 7,500 $ 3,000 $$ 7,500 $ - Grant ---- -- 25 OOQ $ 92'00 E T O T ALS $ 10,000 $--'--61000 $ 25,000 $_16.000 $ H#HHH3QHi(HHS(iH#HH}E�(H'iEHH>HtaQHDf14iE%HHHai%-H �"�Jl'._.x.;_,fie t 3F�i-Hi?it•3Y�4-iE#-H-H-Hi(#QHS-H-%i{#-H-Dt-H-H-Hai•%DS-?4ii-XXit-H'#-H-DF�t- LOCATION: 'c LL - <faPy \ mN r r<rtce•' N��_.si � i• ' � ,e� � O i+�_______•__0/.K ^;T � F§FII_ �1 1 �� tl r.---• • G Lowas.Tnes Nnax'k at � t - �nnzn Ta • — -- ;i�_ J sr at oax14,___.�� air � �` 'Sr�` .R xuw.rEll•r ryv. - r r. �Ki4:,�.� T„ w xr. �1.� ° s.. TIa<NO 9T. , � ;b. ^ x.4•: l ` • 9 # CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN ! PROJECT DETAIL r PROJECT: FANNO CREEK PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (I) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS '(214) ` PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown, Main Street to Hall Blvd. south of Burnham Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fanno -Creek Park to be developed as a ,community-level park, serving the recreational needs of citizens on a City-wide basis, providing greater geographic` balanee to the City's parks system, and relieving pressures of over use at Cook Park. Improvements will include foot bridges and paved trails. { s Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50/50 matching grant. a ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: s Phase I - FY 84-85 Foot Bridges: $ 8,000 s Paved 'Trails 10,000 $ 18,000 ` ( Phase II - FY 86-87 Foot Bridges 8,000 ` Phase III FY 86-89 Foot Bridges $ 8,000 18;000 Paved:Trails 10,000 TOTAL: $ 44,000 xx#�txxlF##x3t3E#x'Exp#xiF#x)4xxxiFYc3t#3txxxi(kxlEiQx#xxi;iF#iE##�HtitxAtx#x#x#-x-xx#xxxxx3txat#xxxxxx i SCHEDULE AND 'FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL 4 Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State --- City Parks Bond $ 9,000 $ $ 4,000 $ $ 9,000 $ 22,000 Grant $_ 9,000 $ $ 4,000 $ $ 9,000 $ 22,000 $ $ $ T Q T a L S $ 1e,00O $ _ $ 8,000 $ $ 1e,000 $ 44,000 s PL. i- LOCA TION: -r•4PXERtaE 3T. � ) w=� u C Rf=� �L._ 3`Z XIYi1ERIX � �� N' �•� � �S,N f Li c U t +q0 LL 9 n n > {tt SW LT T ., -4 A�w1tT 5T w •P' �p� C�e".� t �y n SPtPN i �, StII.AXX ST. M SP's . k•P 4� s ST J`4 t 0m 3 w cr, a Fa u A JJ• nnO f _ CAPMFp St Sa. f rE y1 . �,. CreLek - ATF NS S � P•J�. Park ~ �/C f // Sw. ALOCRTA ST. / tt � ,�;.• � Te w,/ 5.w♦oNt A 9 w GXAXT S [ a4Pk Et oEAat CEL _ /sacs ao �,d• +µ ..eN� �{r_ � S. 1fAX ST. SII if sM. 4 v, +�\ qR v• el J \ ! ,'t.k > � M � ' '/X,i 5T: R Ft // I VSi�Q� 'd�P /•!i• 5 W. 0}IIWA - R,y P^ � i cr ter. e° ser ewE.eoo sT. � I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: ENGLEWOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION:. OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area .of City, near Ironwood Drive g PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Englewood Park is a large neighborhood park `pr,oviding :primarily a natural setting with trails, playground`; equipment and .<open spaces. Proposed improvements include rebuilding trails, signing and drainage work Probable funding `would, be from an approved parks bond. #-k-kiHH(-k#-k-k-k-Dt-kiE#-x-)E-D(-x-k-k##-##-k-k-k�-k-H-k x#-k-x-k#k#x-3(-Dt-DE M34•#-k-x-k�E-k-k-H�Ek-Dt-x##�E#-Ii-DE'.(-H kiE##k-x-kil-k k-k x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Rebuild Trails $ 2,000 Signing 1,000 Drainage Work 2,000 $ 5,000 _ Phase II - FY 85-86 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 4,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 _Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work TOTAL: $ 21;000 kit-lE-k-k####-#-k#i(k at-k#H x-k#�(3Fk-k�Ei(-x-k ki(-k-3',-?t-xifk-x-H#-x#-x-k=rt H-x'#-x-k 1t#iE#-x�(-k-k#�('•{H k-k-x-k x-k#-H-H k#x-k x-k'#-Yc 4 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY:87-88- FY 88-89 TOTAL _ Federal State $ $ $ $ $ $_ City $ $ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 � 4,000 $ 4,000 $$- 21,000 T 0 T A L S $ 5,000 _ $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $_ 4,000 $ 21,000 1FkH#-3E1Ex-k H-)f�tiE3E#-?(-x-kk-k-k-k-3f-x#-x-k-x k-k-if-k#-x-k-Dt-iE#iFx=##x-lElE-xi(-EE#3('kx-?Ek-#-k#HiE#-k-k-k-k-x-x�EiF#-k-x-x-T(#-3Fx-x-DHEre LOCATION: . L«OSP 5T. CNOLLS •- I J� i ] V�l�l � ,/� �(��`'.�' �a y• a,. "t;. _ sone. snH£ p"'°„ � / i AGM F _ • t NI1 sw . ne oa p, /s lwT1 ser woPT W ^I I I S•' SUYwEII r S CM. ^ v t _ F w w �' •'cb `� �a C / p A s w. TO- 5C "_ s.n f •; zn Lp RC4£St D41V�CS'/� M LLNSS GC Ell ( CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (OPEN SPACE) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (2-14) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION:- The ''greenway system is an interconnected area ofnatural open space encompassing the ' floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries. The greenway system ,provides forg^ preservation of the natural drainage system, passive recreation and pedestrian/bicycle travel. ' Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. #it-T(!{-D(#2f-Y(-7f-ii-N-M-IEN�IEa#�FKiE-K#1F?it-1F-9EKfi'k•K-DEN-iEiEM-�{-94-1(-SE3t#M-�EiE #HYF-3E#(#kE�E-M-gt�n-ic-:;.-M�d-K ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection $ 5,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 ' Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5`,000 Phase V - FY '88-89' Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 TOTAL: $25,000 #-Dt-Y-D�iEDEid-Di-�i(-DE#iti(-K-DF-H-Dt-Y.#8E-1`'-FE#-D�D�i(# ;DS-DQ3(-Mit-MDE)d HiQ-Dt#?EDFD(-D(-,�f-M-DS##-Dt-M'k XPkDEH}f-h'#DS-DEDt-N-3t-�-DE3QiEM.yr. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-66 FY 86=87 FY 87-88 FY 88-69 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ _ Parks Bond $_ 5,000 $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 T2 T A L S $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 D�f'DQ#-M-�#DF#3t#3f Hit#M-MFM-DE-M-T4-M-Mi{-M•M•iQ-Mi4#-}t#M-M-Mit-D:iE3fiQ#X-Df-DE-DFM#M3£-M-Mi{-M#-M•i#•M#M•#-M-D(iQ-M# LOCATION: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (TRAILS) DIVISION: OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) ; PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The greenway system is an interconnected area of natural � open space reek and its major encompassing the floodplains ®to Fexpandanno cand connect` existing P tributaries. It is thet tails theCity lthe'greenway, into a unified trail identification, land :segments of bicycle/pedestriandov@meats include -property network. Proposed improvements acquisition/easements and trail construction. € pproved parks bond and a 50/50 match grant. [ Probable funding would be from an a # M# y� _ B- -Dttx�t�t �-apt-Mss-s�-stx-#-�-�-!tit- #�t -x-�tat�a€•�-x�c-x�;aat�•�-�!-�c-x-�c-x-x-x�a-x-�3HFx�c-staex-x�tat-xaf u-x' � ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 2 Phase I — FY 84-85 Property Identification $ 5,000 Land Acquisition/Easements 2,000 $ 17,000 Trail Construction 10,000 Phase' II - FY 85-86 Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Property Identification, Trail Construct 17,.000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Prop y ntification, Trail Construct 15;000 Phase IV - FY 67-88 Property Ide17,000 Phase V - FY 88-89 Property Identification; Trail Construct $ 81,000 OTAL is �Exit�t�t�c�t �-�-x-x- -�-:d-�a--x x n-x-�-xx�t-x-�--x=xx•�-tt�-�c -x-tt-x�-x-x-�€-rix-n-x-�c�-x-x-x-tc- -x-�-��-x�-��c-r��t x-x-x xaca�-�xx-x � SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 8A-85 fY 85-86 FY 86—€37 FY 87-88 FY 80-89 ---- -- Federal State $ -- — $ _ $�— $ 61000 City 5,000 $_ 5 000 _ $5.000— $ 25.600 t Parks Eond $ 1 CO2 0 $ 1 001 00 $ 121000— $_ 10oo $ 12,4000 $ 5 Grant $ 5,0 0 $ 5,000_ $_ $ _OT_A L S $ 17,000 $ 15,000_ $ 17.000 $ 15,000 $ 1� 7 000 81,000 LOCATION: F a'" r t 1. -x - 'tri...,;.. .?,.. '� ~•Y F,. . x .rte - - +� ,` - a.• .. ' '<. SO s P� WVW � � • tyjj9li � +�'Elf r ��°e ��;r•.. way<.`A � �*�"►�7'-�,:� ® � � a Y�"� 'fit• =ave^��,�{i�_�✓'y .�+,�,aii� r- \ ,� i r� 093 r <>< .a= ,-`*' +'ar r YDY ti�Y,i'l \. fit/ `*' `* ,y •i Ma IN t Nr x � �•!.s-moi t.rAIX = `dY' Y�Is SO V4, R yu 41 ` x 'tet-r„ k: � {� � �',��•,,�;• }"��'�. sAf Alk ' �} • 1y� i4 t - �� r/ . � 21,1'�'�x��.i€ v.�-tib..i�' f'lt�M+f's�- 1�� •;-_ r#r3,s� w •�_... ,,.�}KY.��}ir ��,�.4"ir ,Cvv'r f `� �u. .sem' •c ham. .. ...... �•cg I' •. .+" c-4»cs:�n--- lip CAPITAL IMpROVEMMT PROGRAM PLS pRojECCT DETAIL PROJECT COOK PARK ADDITIONAL PARKING ORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONNT: PUBLIC S---PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin River k is a regional park providing a variety e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Pars le. Existing facilities recreational activities on a City-wide, and larger sca include bol diamonds, soccer fields, restrooms, picnic tables, sheltered 1 areas, playground equipment, and boat launch. Proposed improvements include the provision of additional parking spaces. Probable funding would be from an approved park3 bond and a 550/50 xatch� yl�t- -DHFx3t9H4-xdS-)t-�-YE3t-Dt�-Df-YF9t#M ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST $ 50,000 Additional Parking TOTAL: $ 50,000 3g tit x EiHt x#H3-----x3tx DEit Nit x x x tt H x Di�1�x x x M k3i Dt x3H ` SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 66-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $-_� $ Citi $ $ $ 25,000 $ $ - — $ 25,000 Parke Bond_ $ $ $ 25 0OO Grant $ $ $ 25,000 $ $------- $---a-- 50,000 $ $ _— `$ 50.000 T 0TALS $ $ — 3f3F'Jr33 KBE#i�H DFX Dim xi...PH...-- 1 LOCATION: q l� ' cS Rif PN39 R4 �+ € " S(�.CT U d �oT, � I'I Mill Mv cT. yr4,1 ` 1 _ t lfSt 1 1 .Qj sEuaotiD �i..v °n , xa nwxrr aoao • P `''L�i � gq i 1'•= �EOa,l,0 r' dS 1 } } CAPITAL IMPROVEM-r-NT PROGRAM PLAN E PROJECT DETAIL i DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: COOK PARK HORSESHOE PITS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS 1214) 4 PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avc.-2nue south to Tualatin River PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park -wide, and is a larger scale. Existing variety s on a City facilities recreational activitie include ball .diamonds, soccer 'fields:, �estrooms, picnic tables, sheltered .. areas, playground equipment, and boat launch. Proposed improvements include construction of horseshoe Pits. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. *#;k-:1EiF;E3F DE M)E 1ctYHt M32 H H�Y�Ex3i bs ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 5;000 Construction of Horseshoe Pits TOTAL: $ 5,000 •,,,„vuyclFk-Kit#M-M-x-9;-Yc3FH-x##(-H-D4-Hsi-x3FiFYcD£'ic2HEi(YcM-M�(-Hx-1��(-%##�-Dt-Mif-xit-'Ait3k-3HEP4 H-itif �--kit-3E-Yc-PF)4-M�EY�X-AE-14?t-3Ei(-)E3rD�r-,rr,-.. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY- 87-88 FY 88-89.-. TdTAL Federal $ -- $ $_-- $ $ S__tate $ $�_ $ $�--- $City — $ 5,000 Bon Parks Bo $�_---- $ ------ $ 5.000 $ $— --- $�� $ _T 0 T A L S $ _ $�----- $ 5.000 $ $ $ 5,000 x xat xa�x rc x x�c�t�c .............x�t'rt xx x rt x�t rc r�M Ot t xaa � aY LOCATION: q e I i ij 13 i V� W A / - '�,/JJ/ ws¢rw^1 ' � Y S.W.,Oc'� i� BYLVA YER l�.y��R ROAD V {Lv 4V'r � JtAw 11 }I ~ 1 . i k . CAPITAL IMpRovEPJEW PROGRAM PLAN t PROJECT DETAIL 1 PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK PARKING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City —near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summeriake Park to be developed as a community–level t park, serving the recreational needs of citizens on a City–wide basis. Locationofa community park in the northwest section of the City will provide i greater geographic balance to the parks system, and relieve pressures of : improvements include provision over–use atCook Park. Proposed of parking spaces. Probable funding would be from a parks bond and as conditions of development. n -x-Yf-H 1i•'r(-��F��yk�#M-�#-ft-ti#�(#it xat-x3tat-M�#�t�Ftt�(# � ' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT'COST: s Phase I – FY 86-87 ' $ 15,000 i 15,000 , Phase II FY 07-89 TOTAL: $ 30,000 - #�(-x-H-M-DEic -X-SCK-x-xi€-x-�M-�-Dt-M3t-x-x-D�x-x-1E-xx-1fiED�#DE#-x-1HE#�-x-iFYclt-Ycx-��%M-DEi�BHHHti4-§c SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY-87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ State _ $ $ -- $ — $__ $ City _ $ $ — $ $ $-- $ Park Bond $ $ 15,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $� $ j Grant _ $ $ $_ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ $ 15,000 T O T A L S $ $ $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $_ $ 30,000 -:EY,i4-DE#3£-1i-3(i�3t-�3t X3F�n��arrcit=�-�X M-HifiE 3i-Y4- (ii-94if-Yr3F3HC#?ti4�t-Mi4�F3Ht�i-H#'a#-D4#?£aEiE:4�£-H-il-A4-f#-H##X-�-�-H-SHt'rF3(-Mit --_z ----��o- -- LOCATION: 1 • 2r „I r-- 3< !9 t 3y1 ,• �T LMUgr 5T. \ a TERT,Y LN 3M. P N Li 711 "I L3=" SDI, R « /'aYl � ESE � �•. t t. X� 1. ��H �t Tw.xN,- d L. 9.ar. nt A pCA1N ANOTA ST. 114��""�� 2.1 i �•�. 4 9UaYEA xf 'S w I 'Tb i./ P •it 9T Q T1 40 r^;' tnt• t Y I� MaN 0 sm is CAPITAL 3:MpROVEFELTT PROGRAM 'PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROTECT: SUMER PARK PICNIC AREAS, DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS FISHING PIERS DIVISION:...: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) , PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City - near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a cow detybasis. ` needs of citizens on park, serving the recreational a City will provide it Location of a community park in the northwest section of the City greater geographic balance to the parks system, ssures of and relieve pre over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include provision of additional picnic areas, and construction of fishing piers. would be from an appp�roved parks band and a 50/50 math ax Probable funding � ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase Y - FY 86-87 Picnic Areas $ ' ,000 10,000 $ 15,000 I Fishing Pier 5 5,000 Phase II - FY 87-88 Fishing Pier 10,000 Phase III FY 88-89 Picnic Areas $ 5,000 15,000 Fishing Pier TOTAL: $ 35,000 ` *X-"bt3i x k Yr34 lFM#M' -�E#-3E•3#iE-x-M-h-DES(�-xiti4aE4-xit�F•D4-3(-x�t M-x-x-3t-3€ FM-t(#�F�-x��E}t-M•#-x-�t-NrTS#3{•� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAPJ FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89_ TOTAL- Federal $ $�� $r $ — $----- State $ $ $ $ `$ City $--- $- �- $ 10 ODD $ 5.000D_ $ to 000 $ 052 00 Park Bond $`- $ 5,000 $_ $ 51000 Gran $ 10,000 t $------ $ $ — T O T A L S $ $ __ $ 15,000 $ 5.000.- 15,000 $ 35,000 -DEX�F3/cSE•Dfi4-tHt�'cX�EDI'#%`-Dt. -M)• i��aL =:�.7� i+rDE-DYN-➢4�Q-M-H-DFii�4-S�r�i#zX-)4-M-)43f�E#E LOCATION: AF st SW HA . <Y� f i t.M. - 6 THORR'St: W' .I ee N`' .* �ON05LRF7 v a NA i / NAYML DEP T — ilit2ARITA L_RO _ �4 NJR7 CA--X�. 6 (` < YPRTN AKOTR MJ r w �e4 .. G p h RIDAR6 S y Tl.ui. i.I •C"Rt t tT. f.rt. I `: icy '� �2 ,;R 1 •1 ! l:. .. l n BALE Mal qjpl CAPITALIMPROVEKENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT:' FANNO CREEK PARK DAM, LAKE DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: ` Downtown, Main Street to Hall Blvd. ''south of BurnhamStreet PROJECT` DESCRIPTION: Fanno Creek Park to be developed as: a community-level park, serving= the ' recreational needs of citizens on a' City-wide basis, providing greater geographic balance' to the City's parks ,system, and relieve pressures of over use at =Cook Park. Proposed improvements - include construction of a 'small dam on "Fanno Creek and preparation of land for creation sof small lake. Probable funding would be from an approved 'parks 'bond. 3f-H"K-xit-SE-DF}f#?E?E Mi(-M-x-P4-M-x-)k- HHf-Df-x-x-x-3E-x#if=94-icic�ici,-x-M-x-?(-2d-:ElE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Construction of dam, lake $ 5,000' TOTAL: $ ,5,000 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING 'PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85•-86 FY '86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-84 TOTAL Federal $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ $ $ 5,000 $ $ $ 000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T O T A L S $ $� $� 5,040 $ $ $ 5,000 ##x r.v irn�i n rn iiiQ#5�€�t.#3d YHd }t-x#x-x-iE-x-xit#YrYc-}E M-x-k#x-H-H-x-x-iEli-M-ld�;-x�.x>(')4 x3f-Pt� LOCATION: / ` :T, a t'Dr/a�� v �� -f-.A. EmnE ST. "'�` E ae J -/ —xwTT�Y —� Ruaa�,()cT. J. Ri"N��, 4E:1' Sw.LNN SZ. WPG.p11T 3T.M s at4- � ♦ -1 *[. . `=a J as gV' 4 wit _ N a nw.tr nt.. S' �• .,a 1' /\ s4' 9y t~ F F nJm� : 4 CI.PNEN T. s>x. s.w. v' a ya Fanno so. +LWATA sT. w.nn.s w g`4 Creek - wit s.w•one:� ft a� n� •Park 1�, • •,, 5 w 4A pT .F. �g e@S @� S ST � fIGP"-", Rti F b 4 3� 'S �•! y ••Ltv�.Si 64 / �a sw. dot �' • c ? sn. u vu.s' w?.... / ' i.� � a. Y` �, lST. f3� ��gA P¢G PN'� 9CN dP T:' W.w EOBEV000 4T. Ham93MWINno ZMAS—!Aft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMPLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: WOODARD PARK BRIDGE DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) REPLACEMENT between Katherine St. & Johnson St'. PROJECT LOCATION: Central area of City, a neighborhood park serving primarily PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Woodard Parlawns, trails, lighting, and playground local residents with open space, equipment. Proposed improvements' include replacement of foot bridge. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. xxxxDxxtExxaHccxxatx�c#xxrttxxxaExxxx�txxxx �-KBE-x-�t-3E�t-3t-x�x#M- ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 5;000 Replace Foot Bridge TOTAL: $ 5,000 e_- 3Fxig-#'�Fx-x-x-x�E-M-D(x-)t-x-lhx-�'x-x"x�Ex-DF�t-fEH-7�x-x3iH-N-xMiE4t-:E-PHE�E3E)(�4-�' ' € SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 84-85 FY 8_ 5__=__86 FY 96-s7 _-- - FY'- 87-88 FY 88-89 Federal State City $__ -_ --- 0 $ 5,000 Parks Bond $=J $--- $ $ $ ------ - $ S,Ooo $ $ 5,000__ $_ ______- $ . TOT RLS $^__.---- xxxx� xxx�cax�tax�txxxxxxxrx�cxatxxxxxxacxx`��x�xxxxx�cx � ��'` a� 5w. .••NAT M4 J ___' PL. W )5 LOCATION: -SHE G ST-- `�I1 _PF_FN 2 T° •E° lK d5 Nt r�7 tit R ESOAS ,.a b < �q-• y,M SN1.ANN ST. Y wP1- _. GWO T t T St AF i ST M V � 9 eo i 1 m iP. � 44 l'r ,. sr /'ikt f 4�`✓ 4+.,°.'/�'t".fcl„ °°*,y 11 K: fF 3 ' � -'�. SW. Je 'a' 99/� Fanny F}5'tl a ST Sri. FfMN£P uS.re. w y'iA GAPNFN ST. -W�A.TKINS S SS�..Pack Vin SW. A,MRTA ST. Tl/ ST. .pAG CZ. RPM oP.L G �,/ ,At[S 110. � �� '- ♦' ._�� +�� .j PAP S` SW. GA i AN91ST- '� M1 3'-�/� .� w� F � .IZ �e i.LN. S /// � 4'^�'@� O� Sri• � 4a.°a obMA f� _ f/ y S W EMEw0Q0 ET. S! E k eLk I 4.1 p Illn ig lip 3 ONE u- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN ` PROJECT DETAIL s DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: COOK PARK IMPROVEMENTS (I) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City -- 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin iding a variety of- River fRiver is a regional park prov facilities PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park -wide, and larger scale. Existing sheltered z recreational activities otrooms, picnic n a City include ball diamonds, launch.soccer fields, u ctables, , and boat nh: Proposed improvements include areas, Playground equipmentequipment, sprinkler system and drainage work. k expanded picnic areas, paved ( 1Si(x�(x#i(iYf�t E M x H H xi(#x x x x#3EM x'x3f x M pp proved parks bond. ding would be from an a x�� 'x x # Probable funxxx # ix# a; R ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: t e: 5,000 Phase I FY 84-85 Paved Trails $ 2,500 Sprinkler System 2;500 E Picnic Areas 2 $$ 12,000 Drainage Work ---E-00 12,000 x. Phase II FY 85-86 12,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 12 000 12,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 ; Phase.V - FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 60,000 � ##'x�;-?Eid-k-x-i(ifYcxiFx#x-Tf'1�x'#'x-x-x#•7�#�(-xE#14-x-�-?Ex#1Ex#xx.x-ySM-xaHi'iFx-xiEx�,(-)t-x'x3Eil##?'cx-#x-)tTE#'x-1(-x'x•�Ex-)(-SE#iEx-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY Y 8�----— FY 85 85 FY 8_6-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89_ -'-- Federal State $ -- $ 60 000 11 $ 1 0 $ 12 000 $ 1 O $ ParK Send $ 12,000 — $ _ 60,000 $ l z 0©®_ t)OQ $ 12 000 $_12,000 T O T A E S $ 12, _ $ 12 000 $ i£i4iY-R��x� 'e'`if#'A-x-x-x-x-3{•x'�4-x�t• �/ , - .�-�(. "x. x��'x-x�'�'�-x-x"x�-x-x-x•x-x'x-x 1 Q 1 I p �, LOCATION Y 1911+ � ouSE Ra.0 er xRRTM 1; t. CT sCT 09 4R'.000 0 1` �IaOalx+ `- ?. SN irMOLV R0.0 �. 4 f C if ' y��.'��tt Man!'. % >j, i l yr(�l ~`I• S.W. Fb F 2 n ti9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (II) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) ' PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City - near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a-',coimnunity-leve: park, serving the recreational needs citizens on a City-wide basis. section of he City will provide Location of a community park, in the northwest' greater geographic balance to the parks system, and relieve pressures of over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements ,' include bank protection, lighting structures and landscaping. Probable -funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50/50 matching grant. ��t-x-x-x#x-; x-x-it-�-�x-n-x•�i-x-x#x-�t#x-x#x-stat x-x#x 3�-x-x•xxx'x-x-x-x-x-x-x'x-x-x x-tc#�t-x x-x-tt-�c-x-x-x-x-x'x-x-x x#;t-x x'it-x-x-xx xx-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 10,000 Phase I - FY 84-85 Bank Protection Phase II FY 85-86 Bank Protection $ 10,000 16,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 Phase III FY 86-87 Bank Protection $ 10,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 25,000 Landscaping 4,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Bank Protection & Lighting Structures 16;000 Phase V FY 88-89 Bank Protection, Lighting, Landscaping 25,000 TOTAL: $ 92.000 ( jf-x•x"DF�Exx#K3(-x-x-x-x-x'�t--x-x-x#x->i-�x-x'-xx-DE#'X-x-x-xx-tEx-xx-xk_x-x-x-'x-�-ii-x-x-TEYc'x-x-xx-tE-x-Y.-'A-x-x-ii'#1Ex-�t-'�i'cx-x-x-x-x-x-it-x'�.-lfx-� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $_ State $ $ $ $_ $ $ City _ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 10,000 $ 13,000_ $� 17,500 $ 13,000 $_ 17,500 $ 71,000 Grant $ $ 3,000 $ 7,500 $ 3,000 $ 7,500 $_ 21,000 T 0 T A L S $ 10,000 $ 16,000 $ 25,000 $ 16,000 $ 25,000 $ 92,000 x f(xi4�t#x#M�(S�t x H PFiE x�ti(i(' i#H T(xii#3t�Eii'�f x i4it:E#x x xi x x 3t xiEi(i(�Fx x�(if x 3fiE#3i x xif'#x 3f H3E i(ii i4 x}i H}t3Ht 34�i x#3��: c � T LOCATION: �1, �1 /.. ]e l0 �� LOCUS•. ST YAPLE"AF T ------------- OCA% . mi NAW%B of AnFAnrtA. — - ..E si--� ` S « rri%rx�L,oauo14_ cT. "r'�� M n(PIPN 4%OTA. YT.F•" T IAC'Est MV LEMO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: ENGLEWOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION.: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area. of City, near Ironwood Drive PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Englewood <Park is a -large neighborhood park providing primarily ; a naturalsetting with trails,' playground equipment and open spaces, Proposed improvements include rebuilding trails', signing and drainage , work. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. #3tiS-ii-DHt-x-)c-€i3B-i(�f-x-ai-;(-x-)E-�f-At-x-DEdE•�t3i•#-x�d-Ycat-TE#-x-3�3d-x-x-�-1Y-)t-9f-;1-#-x-Df-#-Di-DEi£-x-3i-#-x##-2t-3d-x'h-x-x•�i-x-H-x-M x-x-x-)t-3(-x-�4#aFM x-x',E . ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I FY 84-85 Rebuild Trails $ 2,000 Signing 1,000 Drainage Work 2!000 ` $ 5,000 Phase II FY 85-86 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase V FY 88-89 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 r TOTAL: $ 21,000 �r�§E�-M##�Tf-iHi�f-D(•M-H-Yc#•3E M�(•'�',E-t£-M#-3E�iE-H k-1E-14�f-D�-kDE#-DQ-R-H-M•3f�-M M#M-lE##-H-M�4if#-3E#-)E#3ri(##-lf-x-H�-X#-'.(-�##-1E-K K-D(i4-)E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 64-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 - TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ Cid- $ $ $ $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 41000 $ 21,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T O T. A L S $___5_,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 21,00 #a€ -x-x-x-��u-x-};-��+� �-sae-x-x�r-r��-acx-tt- -�•x-�-x�-�n->f�-�c-►t-��-x��--�x x-r�# LOCATION: 'I /!�-5w�y!:• u aAL I L£ ST I � � Nsvl.ct[Ar �.tJ isr•�-1I D W «/.-- r wT11 .r lO5T0.lT s_ MAcu$ecA� \t Mw.l.. OANOTA '+T r SV MON! DA so 51eryR.A e S«. it dbiICLNCsf R1b t J • �� , 9t. f p s. l w i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL a PROTECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (OPEN SPACE) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—PARKS (214) PROTECT LOCATION: City—wide PROTECT DESCRIPTION: The greenway system is an interconnected area of natural open space encompassing the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries. The , greenway system provides for Preservation of the natural drainage system, passive` recreation and pedestrian/bicycle travel. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. t: r�n�rfz #x #M?ixx#xxxxx)fxMiFx#x#3ixxiCi4Dt#ifxxxx?f?fx)Ex#xxitxj(#ifx#xxD�x# ' iE#x-K x-H-H-YE#9(it-1E�x-�FiE)F#-R-x-x••"••++n x ESTIMATE OF 'PROTECT COST: Phase I — FY 84-85 Public Access', Signing, Wildlife Protection $ 5,000 : Phase II —;FY 85-86 Public Access, Signing, �lildlife Protection 5,000 . Phase III — FY 86-87 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection �,Q00 � Phase IV — FY 87-8E Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 ` Phase V — FY 88-89 Public Access., Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 TOTAL: $25,000 iExxY#iE ?�➢tx'H4xY xxxxxx3E3Fxx}ExiQlE3(Yrxxxx-x-', *x-xx-xxxxxxMx#xxIiM#lExx?FDEi(K-WK-K*x-x-xiE#***x#?FM-K-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85._ FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL . Federal $ _ $ $ State $ $ $ $ Cita — $_ _ $-_ $ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $$ 5,000 � 5 000 � 25,000 (? T ALS $ 5000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5.000 $ 5,000._ $_ 25,00 LOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRNi PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (TRAILS) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS _ DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The greenway system is an interconnected area of natural open space encompassing the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries. It is the intent .of the City' to ,expand and connect existing segments of bicycle/pedestrian trails ,in the greenway, into 'a unifies: trail network. Proposed improvements include property identification, land acquisition/easements and trail construction. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and a 50/50 match grant. ##it-t-x-?(-H-x-x-YAM#it-3t-#-x-Jf#x#x-M�t3i-3i �E-x#x-��i-K-##•i�-M'+t-'�-��-x�iE-xHit-x#x-x�hx-�#tEiE Dt-DQ##3i-➢E-x•#Ef£-x-x-x�-x-x-)E-x x i(i(# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Property Identification $ 5,000 Land Acquisition/Easements 2,000 17,000 Trail Construction #.0,000 $ Phase II - FY 85-86 'Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Phase III`- FY 86-87 Property Identification, Trail Construct 17,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 7,000 Phase V - FY 68-89 Property Identification, Trail Construct $ 91,000 TOTAL: H X 3F H-x-x-x-D(Mit KiF?f Y##i(H D(3HS#Tt?4# iE3E SC TE'r( K K 31#Ti MiC MiE#E#7t 3(#M H�(##3F #�Q#M#Dt M H�#M#dt M�(H#M M#tFM H#H i( SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY -86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL_ Federal State $ $ $ $ -- $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ --.�_ 000 $ 10.000 $ 12,000 $0 Parks Bond $ 12,000 $ 10,000 $ 12, Grant $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 5 000 $$� 5,000 25.000 T 0 T A L S $ 17,000 $ 35,000 $- 17,000 $ 15,000 $ 17,000 -*X*W LOCATION f i I` CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN l - PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT`. SUMMERLAKE PARK TENNIS COURTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) r PROJECTLOCATION: Northwest area of City ;- near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a community-le l park, serving the recreational needs of citizens' on a City-wide ba, Location of a community park in the'northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic< balance to the parks system, and relieve' pressures of over-use at Cook park. ` Proposed improvements :include conof tennis courts, fencing, and lights. k Probable funding would be from a 50/50 match grant and as conditions of , development, t iQ#3(-x-)C-x-x�Ei:Ait-34•x-#Pd#-3HF'J(#�E-YE'lf-Ki(-x-P;-x#'}(3HE-P(iF-x#3(-DE-x-)(i(-xaE-xiHE-x-x-3fi€-x-3F-DE',(-x-DCif-x-x i(i4-x N-x3(-x-x34i:-x#��(#1H(•#xiE - ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST`. Phase I - FY 85-86 Tennis Court Construction Grading & Lighting $ 15,000 Surfacing & Fencing 35,000 $ 50,000 Phase II - FY 87-88 Tennis Court Construction Grading & Lighting $ 15,000 Surfacing & Fencing 35,O0G $ 50,000 TOTAL: $100,000 �� x�t��rc-x-x-x-xa�-x� x�a-x-x-rfx-3c-x-x-x-x-�•x-x-xx-x-��x-x-x-xa�x-x-x=,c-xx-�x-�t-x-xx-x�x-xxa��x-xx-x-x�-x�xas-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x�-x F. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN T FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ State $ $ $ $ City $ $_ $ Grant $ $ 35,000 $ $ 35,000 $ $ 70,000 Developer $ $ 15,000 $ $ 151000 $ $ 30,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ t T O T A L S $ $ 50,000 $ $ 50,000 $ $ 100,000 i4-x-4i-3'cx-i:#t¢x•3Fxx-x#lY-x-x-x-ttit-x-x-�tiE-x-x-x DHi-x-F4••DE-x-x-x-x-x-x-xx-x-x-xiExitit-aE'1E#x-)Fx-x-x-x Dt-x-x�4-x:z-x-x-xa(-x�(-x�-x-x-x x x.x K-u.� LOCATION t'{'¢ R .it 1\ Sa 3! S,p J 1--... lOCUi, SL 313. «art[t¢ar p sr � t LtRrr f raorR sT. •�.....�...a'a a_/� ..._'�1� _ ...-_. ... .`e.a al' . 1!i la- 1_��i....,d�.' s t `REm L aa• . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL ra PROJECT: SUiKIERLAkE PARK PARKING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKSDIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City - near Glacier Lily Circle community-level PROJECT ;DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a co-wide basis. park, serving the `recreational needs of citizens on a City Location "of a community park in the northwest section of the;City respressures of pressures greater geographic balance to the parks _ system, and relieve pres over-use at cook Park. Proposed improvements include provision of parking spaces. Probable funding would be from a parks bond and as conditions of development. iSii-�iF',Q�EK-D4#1€�-A#DH(-7(-Y-�M-MAY-#ti$-DE-1(-Di#K-H�E#H-#�#k-X-M'iE32#M-Hii'tf-M-743(-x-M-F(-D(#k#X#1EitiF14-14#)E�f-1E3i#iHt#EE *##Yc ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $'15,000 Phase I - FY 86-87 15,000 Phase II - FY 87-88 TOTAL: $ 30,000 i4 M-BHG-D4-7Ei4'r(iEit-K3Hi�i444�t-44#?E1HEYt#H'7H4ir'i�'fSC ��#1(3£-Y4-x-M#?E34-MiE�t-x-)E3(-)&-}4 7E'/f-Di-11-11F14-iE'/�-7f#M-M-7HE HEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86� FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-A9 TO_ TAL Federal State �v, $ $ $ City $ - $- 7,500 $ 57 OQ $ $ 15,000 Park Bond $�— $- $ 15,000 Grant 7,500 $__7,500 $�_- T O T A L S $ ___— $-- $ 15.000 $_ 15 000 3---- 0.000 ##74-H3:34-SHfM#YF:(#K-X3434-7(#Di-M#k-Di-M3E3d�#It#1EM-%34•'k34#H3£3(#�'�'�#�'�•3i#343(-X743(iF� —: ,I�itiF-$4•�)t3E34if'�t3t g s,� fi!'• ��{{� LOCATION-. + _ Ail10 s 'A pro+-Ls •`- +aE S. + 7i .--•� ',�{-(ISL-+(� �'i �� ^P• •�,e � ()..�: f`t� �i .� . tlAN2A 1T4 L• � ` F-'. 'R�.... M9NTM AROTA T. ..ry....�eP all te a 171 11 rt_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLASS PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK PICNIC AREAS, DEPARTMENT.OPERBLIC IONSORKS PARKS ;(214) FISHING PIERS PROJECT LOCATION:, Northwest area of City — near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a ,community-level park, serving the recreational needs, of citizens on a City—wide basis. Location of a community parkin the northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic balance ;to the parks system and relieve pressures of over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include provision of additional picnic areas, and construction of fishing piers. t. Probable funding would be from anaPrks bond an d #a 50/50 match q x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 86-87 Picnic Areas $ 10,000 15,000 Fishing Pier 5,000 $ 5,000 Phase II - FY 87-88 Fishing Pier Phase III FY 88-89 'Picnic Areas $ l0,Ofl0 15,000 Fishing Pier 5,000 TOTAL: $ 35,000 -�Tt-)€-�-M-:Qi{4i4-4E-3F3t -M-M-x-3Hf-#-M-x3E3t-'d-x-H M H-�(-�##x�i4-)t-x�HF3F�HF3f-M-x-)FDF�Sad-iF-lE�(#M-x�HfiiE ft ' �� SCHEDULE AND FUNf)ING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-36 FY- 86-87 FY 87-88 - FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $-- $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ $- Park Bond $ $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,0oo $ 25,000 $_ $ 5,000 $ 10,000 Grant $ $ 5,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T OTA L. S $ $ $ 15.000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 35,0'Jo ?(#}:'i(-YcK-�EiHfiHf#�t-M-iE-Y�Ht-N-1E-XiE!(i�§EiS-i4-D(-A(i4i(-K-HiHFiHE-M-'ii4-3('%Q�(-M�4i(4!-)EYcsk�'rt#� : w+a: � '=.7` 1'x LOCATION3: �. � ,.]3 7T•' � y NAPLeAEAF �rsL y�� sT i �'• \ � s... � �. � .TNQAN•s It N{'+N'�SE I - ANI0.NITA 1 - /\ uCia N 5� \1` SM pT QAIiO�[Z ST. AkOTA tT� 'RT'—i IIrT - News � _ 3� 8�F s G}}�Ls• w, sueuEn�' m. - U i 1 •<•Cr - ty sT. �'`/� 3:w. TrAAne 3T. sr: s.rr. MUM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRF69 PLAN' PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COOK PARK ROADWAY.RELOCATIONS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS' DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City - 92nd Avenue 'south to Tualatin River PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cook Park is a regional park providing a variety of recreational activities on a City-wade, and larger scale. Existing facilities include ball diamonds, soccer fields`, restroons, picnic tables, sheltered areas, playground equipment, and boat> launch. Proposed improvements include relocation of lower park roadway to provideroomfor later developments. The upper park roadway is proposed to be relocated also, although not until after' FY 88-89. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. ' #-x-Hii�i-kEi'-YE3HHE##3i-X�H-x-Y�-X##•x3ti(-k-iE t4-M-)i-R-X-X-X�cX-XX-3f#St#XH•X-X-x-x-H3E#3t-X-M•3Qi(iE Xif-H-3E-x-N-Y.-Hifif-H##X X-D(iEX H H XiE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Roadway relocation $ 15,000 TOTAL: $ 15,000 gr..- x xMX tXx#DFXXX#sFX�t�iiE xit�ETtX-KOH-x -X-xitX#xXHxx)(X-X* SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 _TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ I$ $ $ $ City $ _ $_ $ $— $ $ Parks Bond $ $ $ $ 15,000 $ $ 15,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ $ $ 15,000 $ $ 15,000 ###��(-x-X-1E-X#HiS#X-�fXiQ-Fi�f-X-X-i:-if-YE- " X-DqfIdi(-)EiE'!S#t4-X-iE-HX-X-'irx-3E#HiEt{-,�icXn-ic-±.+c-�ir-H#h�3di(-X#X-x�^EX x. LOCATION: ws�7 D. sw.ca sc 4 .CT. MUT Ji a NILL L Ji 1 !i .=*� 1; 11 ��-4/ VE AW000j f iJnrsGRA MM uur -•, iY + JOAN a ,,,48ROUR p^�7 •1 � / 41�4Pt �4 \�'Ibw_ - ;....._._. y }. CAPITAL IMPROVEMEMT PRWRAM PLAN F t PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FANNO CREEK PARK LANDSCAPING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown, Main Street to Hall Blvd. south of Burnham Street ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fanno Creek Park to be developed as a community-level park, serving the recreational needs of citizens on a City-wide basis, providing "greater geographic balance to the City's parks system, and relieve pressures of over use at Cook Park. Propossd improvements include landscaping, seeding and mulching. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. #-x#M-1E#ifx•#-14-x�iE-x iE'?HE##'#'#-x'#-x-}£-x#x=�i irn�n x x-##-x�-S!##?E#-x-DH4-x3f•x�sz'x-x-x'#-x-x-x�t•#-x-x�(-xi4##-?(DEiE#-x-x-x-x-x•x xiF ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Landscaping $ 5,500 TOTAL: $ 5,500 SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88_ FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ $� Parks Bond $ $ $_ $ 51500 $ $_5,50 j T 0 T A L S $ $_ _� $_ $ 5,500 $ $ 5,500 xxxxxafxxxxx? 'xx'xxxxx-xrzxxrxxxx# �c'# xxxaxxxxx� xx #x #xxxxr V , Sw••"NATnt r�J LOCATION: T } T A hERini sT. S, Q�� \`xnRRRO CT. L LL�I w D \ . Y'A LY sY. 3 u CLYDEE3 o V T ST. ;ij y Yq, i . �sp KL1 4Y,yw xYl.ANN YT. ' s �,' �= z" sW. LNROL sT. � atM, +•®¢S.. ~ ' Y. � �� 8'iQIInQ �{ice 4a P+reck!. 9 { GW. YID C; ♦6 f � sw. ALR£RTA ST. .. a< aw +.�,.• FACIL Snn .W IOER f % Yw CP MT 1�•��}44 �' Y� S 41 S.Y. b0IT. 71 � ' dy } � o SW. i m ( ST. ; •P' �\��tt" �R T:�. 9f5. O�LtARA `\ i •,(, � � � Fy ,�i xa E(HEw00D YT. f e 2 I F: i II " E I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: COOK PARK IMPROVEMENTS (I) DEPARTMENT:" PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: South-central area of City 92nd Avenue south to Tualatin I Rivera variety Of PROJECT DESCRIPTION: sCo�ka City-widPark is e, onal Pa providing uv Existing facilities recreational activitie occer fields, - restrooms, picnic tables, sheltered include ball diamonds, s and boat launch' Proposed improvements include areas, playground equipment, sprinkler expanded picnic areas, paved,trails, system and drainage work. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. ESTIMATE OF.PROJECT COST: Phase I -`FY 84-85 Paved Trails 5,000 1 Sprinkler System 2,500 picnic Areas 2,-500 2 000 $ 12,000 4 Drainage Work --c— 12,000 Phase II FY 85-86 12,000 Phase III FY 86-87 12,000 Phase IV FY 87-88 12,000 Phase 'V FY 88-89 TOTAL: $ 60,000 ter" �(-yF�-�{-)(#)F#iE-X�x-YE-x-x-M-xx##-1Fifx#-x-x-x'•x-x-DE-!4-)4#1(-x-f{#x-xiEi(-x-x-x-x#?t-xx-x-x-x-xxxx-Ycx)t-x-x#3Fxx?Ex-xxi+(-x-X-3###xX �; r SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL $ - Federal $ $ State City $_ ParkBand $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12 000 60,000 _ $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ $ $ T O T A L S 12,000 '$ 12,000 $-- 12,000_ $_.._l z.000_ $ 12,000 $ 60,000 x y#)f M k'FYi Yc#xit x Hif 8Ei4 9E'kii 9f x xif x 3f)f�HE tE#x#x x`x�4'diE x#xit�( x x 1F)E i(x###Kii##ji 1(x 3Fx Ycx x iH(Ht X X* 3a X x ltiE� I LOCATION: 9 /1 \� 0 AMAN qb I i J ; . �—/ bUgg1N P0. P sw eoocs>•-�-� Y _ J gg eilue ®sr. II • Nltt .., SYtVA E' BENT T \•L� _ '--"" ��aEq� elI a �cI` �. .•:� t _ S.W —otAV POAbH JEAN • '; 't ct f�rt Sti� � G I�� 4, A. t r iap?S•-• 1 o1 CAPITAL'IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT=DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK DLPARfMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (II) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214), PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest<area 'of City near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a community-level park, serving the recreational needs - of citizens on, a City-wide basis. Location of a community park in the northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic balance ;to the parks system, and relieve pressures of over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements ' include bank protection, lighting structures and landscaping. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50/50 matching grant. �i H if x xiEx 7f iE?(313i#Hits(#x9f x#x H-H 3(r(Y4 X-x#M.X.*-X.X.x X x-x x 3i H X H#x x x DFii x x H#x x x x Yc#x H x},x x X*-X X-X X X X-H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I FY 84-85 Bank Protection $ 10,000 Phase II -. FY 85-86 :Bank Protection $ 10,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 16,000 Phase III -' FY 86-87 Bank Protection $ 10,000 Lighting Structures 6,000 Landscaping _9,000 25,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Bank Protection & '-Lighting Structures 16`,000 Phase'V - FY 88-89 Bank Protection, Lighting, Landscaping 25,000 TOTAL: $ 92,000 ifXY.iFXHxHxXi(x'ExiEHxxXiE}txxxHXX.X***(-XXiExx-XK*)(- XXxX3QHxHX-xxxi(HHxxHxHxHi(3ExHXDEHHx�txRHH'H `SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY- 85-86' FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL _ Federal $ — $-. $— $ $ $_- -- State $ $ �— $—-- $ $ _ $ City _ $ $a — $- --- $ $ $ Parks Bond $ 10,000 _ $_ 13,000 $_._17,500 $ 13,000 $ 17,500 $ 71,000 Grant $ $ 3,000 $ 7,500_ $— 3,000 $ 7,500 $ 21,000 $ $------- $ - $_ $ ^ $ $ $- - $___ $ _ $ $ F T O T A L S $ 10,000 $ 16,000 $ 25,000 $_ 16,000 $ 25,000 $_ 92,000 H�S-x#�S�#x#-H-x-X-x-x-}f-X-x-xat H-H-X-x-x-x-x-x#x H x•x�(-X#-X.x H-x x-X-H-X X-x-H-K•x x_x NJ�4-H-x-sE#�Q x-_x-x'(-x#-x-x-?t x�t-x-X-x xx-x-x-x-x-x-K• LOCATION: : r— 41 Ui — = G 4nLEL F yST. �' - F I Is s s i SIG✓p�-��yR E:E ��' (((///\\\ �\i Ply:. iaaC.l a( �C �_ �� Zu allat$AE d c:a YT. sT� Sb. 1MJAt U4�� fi P � � aUPTa aaCTA ��. _ ;T• -tr xn ifi Po�s"� ��Ga� Mia p� wI o(a(fi mvl � J �.—�_'_--- �- •• L� « SM i ei. sr rear s a a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 'PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: FANNQ CREEK PARK DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS (I) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown, Main Street to Nall Blvd. south of Burnham Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION' " Fanho Creek Park to be developedas a` community-level park, serving the recreational needs of citizens on a City-wide basis, providing greater geographic balance to the City's;parks system, and relieving pressures of over use at Cook Park. Improvements will include foot bridges and>paved :trails. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and from a 50/50 matching grant. x-3E x-x-N-xit-x-)t-ltit-x-x-x-H?.-x xit#�f-x-H-x-x#-x-H-x-H-x-x H-DE-x-x-��t-x�t�!�l-x-x3f-)E-x i(#-Dtat x#x-x x H'E-xH-x-x-x#x-x-x-x-x-x-x-H-x#xx�f-x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84--85 Foot Bridges $ 8,000 Paved Trails 10,000 $ I8,000 Phase II FY 86-87 Foot Bridges 8,000 Phase III;- FY 88-89 Foot 'Bridges $ ;8,000 18,000 Paved Trails 10,000 TOTAL: $ 44,000 %SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $----- $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ — $ $ City $ Parks Bond $ 9,000 $ $ 4,000 $ $ 9,000 $ 22,000 Grant $ 9,000 _ $ $ 4,000 $ $ 9,000 $ 22,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 13,000 $ 8,000 $ $_ 18,000 $ 44,000 3Hdx}?YxxxHHYFxif/i1!"Pr' PrI .E#Yrx xRD� x)lxxxx3fx (Yc#x'x(%x'x ?( illMu r N xTlTRERm ' 31 i I ffi LOCATION: HE m oN � RRfItER ST. 7'Y.ATMERINE ST. QH� N CT. S.VI LT sT. .3 1YOESOn1A. ¢. e ', ♦ ST ptR11T � ~ O 4� 5Y.ANN ST. 3 M Sp� N ♦ t(h } *S 0 6 F SXc,AR4[M`aq:. - N d AVE. F- 71 4. o �✓ � N yC Sw NII r sw ``�• - = ... F``� �'} +'"� + °"® •a; �` ~+'� \\. J, A •e 6} tp�f %.!. C.t�1 Syr " Fanho Creek GARkER w „O+ •. MA*GINS + t Sm. AI KRTA ST. s S� ii' p orb L , S.w fOnRER � GR MY �T <ii AREs AD IT, t� OpGPM Gi 0£RRT OEl Y 0 ,r °s a S. iz {1 �T + � +�r�F �� sr� i a�p`F' -�' yc•+r �.\ '_ `r-�' _.�' '�•. 'gym. �..,.°� Sp [lWFw00D sT, n f...: �G E i I 1 I I y4y 3 I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL E PROJECT: ENGLEWOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) ' PROJECT LOCATION:' Northwest area of City, near Ironwood Drive k . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Englewood Park is a large neighborhood park providing primarily a natural setting with trails, ; playground equipment and open y spaces. Proposed improvements include rebuilding trails, signing and drainage work p Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. x #-H-M-lifi�-'ri',i-Dt-H-3FH�ER-H i(H34-M-H�6 X-3E3f-)<r#t-M-H-H-DE#-?i-HH3f-H-1f-H#H i(-H-H-M##iHf-H-H-H-!F-H-H-H-H#-H-3E-3d-H-b(#-H3i-H-H-H-M#-;E-H-H-Mit#H H-H-H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Rebuild Trails $ 2,000 � Signing 1,000 Drainage Work 2,000 $ 5,000 : Phase II FY 85-86 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 4;000 Phase III - FY 86-87 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work 4,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work a 000 4 " g Phase V - FY 88-89 Rebuild Trails and Drainage Work $ 24,000 TOTAL: i(-M-Mit-M�f-M-Hi£�t-M-M3F#-H-M-M-Y#if-M�S-IE-lEi(3E#�f-i+E'R-TE=�i-M-H-H#-jt-H#-D(-H-Mi2Yc#-H-M-3t-HSE##3{-M-H#stsF#�(#-MH-Mi{iEMH-AS-M-DE-M-Mi4H`k-M-M-IE � SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 8b-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL— T Federal $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ City $ $ $— _ Parks Bond $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $$ 4,00.0 $$ 21,000 $ 1 T (y { A L 5 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4 000 $ 4,000 2i,000 •DTA:-!i'.k#-Yi-bHKiS'tH-'#-FcH-'h#if'1F1E-Y�PFM-M-9t-M-H'A-M-M-DQ#i4-7EM-M-Yc•Mit-)i-i':T�ir.�n�T+T-::#iE,'[[[EDt'H-M-M-t4##Yc1HEH-M-H-?•�i<ZE'H-M-P€-Hif##-TEi£i�M-MF LOCATION: t 4 'U •DP ? r3P---- - _- ST ST 5 I ICN\G � - � Y�wor.. Y• \.... SwnCr 4mNF ti4yw'P \\ R w L.ONUSIA 6 YNCRN ST IwTI 1 4 NSwN(S 6FA/// � 7 - aN2wNrtw \ "` � n ST ^n • Y C: ST. ST�_� 9w '..flfl�� OSMO�faT � . NORTN Ow%OTA �_ �....• o ST. S.M. TIOw00 sE a >t ... yr�«•r1 gut�. 1,.,`....il....l , i... �/ -.....•\ �` • LLN.° 1.'S STC L Mimi CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (OPEN SPACE) DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: City—wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The'greenway system is an interconnected area of natural open space encompassing ;the floodplains of Fanno Creek and its major tributaries. The greenway system provides for ;preservation of the natural drainage system, passive recreation and pedestrian/bicycle travel. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond. iEifat�(-�i-x-M�id�M- -2�lcidit-Six-x-'dDE-x-tt#M-x-x-�#x-x-x-x-�x-x-x-x-x-x-H-x-xx-x-9t-x-x3c-x-x�(#-x-x#-x-DEQ#x-x-x-14-x-DEx-H� ESTIMATE 'OF PROJECT COST: Phase I — FY 84-85 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection $ 5,000 Phase II FY 85-86;- Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase III — FY 86-87 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase IV' — FY 87-88 Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 Phase V — FY 88-89 ' Public Access, Signing, Wildlife Protection 5,000 TOTAL: $25,000 #M-H-1E-x-x-4Hfx'M-xat-x-�H-x-DHF-YE X-DE#x#x-tE x-x-x-x-x-3t-x x-x-x-x-x-iE x-x-1(-3E x-x-x-x-x-3i-x-x-x-x-x 3f-x-4H(-x-x-Dt-x-x-)E�(-x-Y(-x-x iQ-x iE#-Y#x-x-fE-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ ' $ $ $ State $_ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $ -- $ Parks Bond - $ 5,000 $` 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T O T as L S $ 5,000 $ 9,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $^25,000 #DaiiDiat-Di-DHf-Mi4-Dt'.d-i4-DEiF-X�#DF?Q-Lt#x-x-x,:=,�R-�-;-Dt3E#x-xaF-x-x-x#xM-x-DS-DE#-x-DI-�-DE3E-x-?('�-x-DFx-DQi{-x-x�(-M-DfiF#x-x-x-DiDf-xatx-DQ LOCATION: �- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAt9 PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: GREENWAY SYSTEM (TRAILS) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION. City--wide an PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The greenwfl system nss of 1interconnectedd s FannoCreekandits natural ajor open space encompassing the Pa tributaries. It is the intent :of the City to expand and connect existing segments of bicycle/Pedestrian trails in the greenway, into `a unified eland identification, network. Proposed improvements include property acquisition/easements and trail construction. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and a 50150 match grant. x-r�(-3t-x-x-�-xt�#-xa��t-#-x;t-x-x-x�t�-x-x-x#x-x-x-x-xx-x-xy-xat#x-x-x-xaHcia-xis-x-x-x-xaEx-►zxa�-x-x-x�'A-kic#x-xx-x-xicit-x-x-xxx-X* ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 ' Property Identification $ 5,000 Land Acquisition/Easements 2,000 $ 17000 Trail Construction 10 000' phase Il FY 85-86 Property Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 truct 17,000 Phase III`- FY 87-87 Property dentification, Trail Cons Identification, Trail Construct 15,000 Phase IV - FY 87-88 Property Phase V - FY 88-89 Property IdentificatTOTALTrail Construct $ 17,000 81,000 x x 3tic x 3S x�t 1f#f x x�i xit x#x 34 H It x 3E3E#x x x It D43'x?Ht x x-R*x#x-x x A-1tit-x-x x Y xat xit#;t�E x x x x x xit it DE#id)tat x3t i x x x x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY8_ 4_85 FY 85-86 FY 8f-87 FY 87-88 FY 68-89- _ _TOTAL ZP Federal �—_ +�_----- � $ ��--•— ��------ State $------- $-------- $ $ City $ $ Parks 80 'd $. 12,000 $_1 0 $ 1 002 0 $ 1_5 O00 $ 1 .000 $ 55 5 000 $_ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ $ Grant � $ 15,000 $ 17,00O $ 81,000 T 0 T A L S $ 17,000 $ 1---5`-OOfl $ 17,000 _ #x3t-DtiEPf-xx'it-x#•�E#K K?!i4-it-x-x x-'tiE'Rit-x-x-x-x-3'F##i(xiE�43t#4SiExiF#x•�ix-it-x-YE-k'-kl#x�4-it-D:xi(-sell-4�rx-}t-3t�:'#x#x-x-x-itiF##Ti-x-14X• LOCATION: ...... ...... .2,�2 K wi� IBM town., PE,�, yg 1, gj� W 31 ®R ORB "a .r�j -l'upwRM AND ,4W gw� go WIN ,A- E, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: SUMMERLAKE PARK PICNIC AREAS, DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS FISHING PIERS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-PARKS (214) PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest area of City — near Glacier Lily Circle and 130th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Summerlake Park to be developed as a community—level park, serving the recreational needs of citizens on a City—wide basis. Location of a community park in the northwest section of the City will provide greater geographic balance to the parks system,° and relieve pressures of over-use at Cook Park. Proposed improvements include provision of additional picnic areas, and construction of fishing piers. Probable funding would be from an approved parks bond and-a 50/50 match grant. y�-x #x-x-x-x-�-x-x�-�x-x�t-xat-x-x-x#x-x#x-x�-x-x,c-x-xat'x-x�c-x-xxit�t�t-x-x�-xx-xx-x�t-x-x-x�E-x-xx-x-x-x-ttxx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 86-87 'Picnic Areas $ 10,000 Fishing Pier 5,000 $ 15;000 Phase II FY 87-88 Fishing Pier 5,000 Phase III FY 88-89 Picnic Areas $ 10,000 15,000 Fishing Pier 5,000 TOTAL: $ 35,000 �` #-x-#ic-x-x3Fx-x-:ti#-x-x-D(-x�(-itiE�-x#1f##',?x-x#-x�HExx-x�E�t-x-Pt�Eit-xiHt-xit-xiHFx#x�'r3EH3c-xi13t-?(iHFxit-x-;t-x-x-xx-x-x-x�fiE-xx-x-x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY-87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ _ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Park Bond $ $ $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 25,000 Grant $ $ $ 5,000 $ $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ $ $ 15,000_ $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 35,000 #x-iRiSiFx-x-x-x�(-x-x->Li(-4Q-x-x#xiHC-x-x-9Ex-Pt x-x-ifx-M#Il'x-PF'�4-i�cx-D(-P4-x#2(iC-�x#?it-x-YFiHEiHt-xi{-x-3E-x-x-xr('�-x-axiE-xp:. wN...,�;_:_:_.7" LOCATION: _-__-_---_ 0. [e[ g nAW 9f sw Noat Dr.0i4---._..�T .y,• Imo.._-�-�,'._�J\2 M I nOMTN DAKOTA ST nl �\ 1 , L[D4 ..M•�..'�1 1 tl d VIT. PUBLIC WORKS STREETS t Primary functions of the Streets Division of Public Works have been the operation and maintenance of the City' s street system, including patching, marking, -signing, cleaning and related, storm drainage work. New street construction is provided as conditions of development in new subdivisions. It is proposed that the City consider joint funding participation with interested local property owners for local street improvements. Probable funding sources for City shares would be the State Street (Gas) Fund and County Gas Tax Fund. The extent of the City's participation would be based on a cost-sharing ratio - of 15% City/85% local property owners, and provided in an L.I.D. Matching Fund. The extent of the funding,,made available for matching would be based on staff projections of the estimated 'annual amount of Local Street L'.I.D. ' projects. The C.I.P. estimates $1,000,000` annually in non-specific, local ` street improvements funded through formation of L.I.D.s, with the City's annual share $150,000. City LID policy priority governing use of matching funds is as follows: (1) existing, substandard underdeveloped `residential areas; (2) economic development related projects (expectation of increases in jabs' or assessed valuation); (3) new subdivision areas (no matching funds provided, but use of City's LID financing mechanisms may be allowed)'. The major emphasis of the City, however, as reflected in the current C.;I.P. , is the identification of major- collector and arterial streets in need of reconditioning; ' to bring all such heavily traveled,, roadways up to full standards. Achieving; conformity;of the City's Collector Street System to full` classification standards is a major priority of the 'C.I.P. Insofar as the major arterial _streets in the City are owned by the State of Oregon (Pacific Highway, .,Hall Blvd.), funding support, for their improvements' would be sought, although the timing and availability of such support is uncertain. Collector classification standards include 44' of pavement width, curbs, 5' sidewalk widths,' storm drainage improvements; bike path, and traffic delineators. Major projects identified for early improvements include Durham Road, between : Pacific Highway and Hall Blvd.; Ash Avenue, between will Street and Burnham Street; and on-off ramps from Pacific Highway to Main Street. stem on City streets is designed to be implemented in The bicycle path sy of the coordination with the paved trails program e Greenway System, to provide an integrated alternative transportation netwcrk in the City. Major collector street projects identified in the C.I.P. have bicycle paths included in their cost estimates. Those streets not scheduled for full reconditioning until a later time period, may have bike paths provided as part of work scheduled to provide improvements to interim standards (asphalt overlays, minor reconditioning) . To fund these latter bicycle path projects, it is proposed a Bicycle Path Levy of $200,000 be adopted. A number of smaller funding sources exist for the maintenance and reconditioning of the City's street system. These accounts include the County Gas Tax Fund, the State Street (Gas) Fund, and the remainder- of the County Road Levy. It is proposed that these funding sources be maintained for projects involving maintenance and improvements to interim standards, as well as matching fund sources for local street improvements. Funding for major reconditioning projects to full collector and arterial street standards would be shared by the City and affected local property owners in joint venture according to the selected streets classification: collector streets -- 25% City/75% -focal property owners; arterial streets - 33% City/67% local property ' owners. The City's 'share of these projects would be derived from the Street - Systems Development Charge (SDC) Fund. The fees contributing to this Fund are currently inadequate' to meet the City's expected share requirements. It is therefore proposed that the Streets - SDC Fund be doubled, from approximately $125,000 annually, o $250,000 annually. This would require' increasing current single-family residential SDC'- fees from $400 ;to $800, with similar increases< in the other building categories. ' These fee increases are considered necessary ',to maintain the quality and safety of the City's street system, and offset the increased wear placed on it due to ' continued strong` growth and development occurring in the City. Funding for projects in excess of 'estimated annual fees collection in Streets - SDC Fund would' be derived from an approved Streets —General Obligation Bond measure. Mft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN { DYVISIOFJ DETAIL DEPARTMENT`: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-- STREETS YEAR "1 - Phase I - Bicycle Path System $184,500 StreetOverlays 100,000 Phase :I - Ash Avenue Completion (South) 334,500 LIDS City-wide 1,000,000 YEAR 2 - Phase II - Bicycle Path System $ 87,000 3 Street Overlays 100,000 Phase I - 'Durham Road 685,000 Phase 'I - On-Off Ramps/Pacific Highway To Main Street 352,000 Phase I - North_Dakota Street 315,000 Phase II Ash Avenue Completion (South) 334,500 LIDs City-wide 1,000,000 a; YEAR 3 - r, Street Overlays $100,000 Phase I - 72nd Avenue (North) 366,500 Phase.I - 'Greenburg Road 426,500 Phase II - Durham Road 685,000 Phase II - On-Off Ramps - Pacific Highway to Main Street 352,000 - Phase II —North Dakota'Street 315,000 LIDS City-wide 1,000;000 YEAR A Street Overlays $100,000 Phase I - Hail Blvd. 1,382,000 Phase I - Bonita Road 329,000 Phase I - Tigard Street Extension - Main St. to Ash Ave. 720,000 ' Phase II - 72nd Avenue (North) 366,500 E Phase II - Greenburg Road 426,500 LIDs City-wide 1,000,000 YEAR 5 - , Phase III - Bicycle Path System $128,000 1F Street Overlays 100,000 Phase I - McDonald Street 460,000 g Phase I - Gaarde Street 150,000 a Phase I - .121st Avenue 350,000 Phase I - Off-Street Parking/Downtown, South of Main St. 630,000 Phase II - Hall Blvd. 1,382,000 r Phase II - Bonita Road 329,000 _Phase II - Tigard St. Extension Main St. To Ash Ave. 720,000 r. LIDS City-wide 1,000,000 E CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN DIVISIOiN DETAIL (Cont.) #-##Tt#Df-MiE#H-YcH#X#H-1Ei(-H-H#X#H#H#H•X-3E#�(-H-H3f-H X-H�(#H-H-M-H-H-XDd#D(-H-H##3(-M#M3(-H-H-X-H-HiHE####DHi-H-H-X it-H-FEH-H 0— SCHEDULE AND FUNDING SUMARY FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Gas $_ 150,000_ $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 250,000 $_ 250,000 $ 1,000,000 City $ $ $ _ $ $---- $ Streets—SDC $_ 83,625 $ 225,000 $_250 000 $—_._ $ 250,_000 $ 808,625 LID $1,100,875 $2,114,875 $2,458,750 $31268,000 $3,815,350 $12,757,850 Cnty Rd Levy. $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $_ 50,000 $_ $ $ 250,000 Street—GO End$ $ 196,625 $ 286,250 $ 806,000 $_._805,_650 $ 2,094,525 Grants $ 108,800 $ $ $ $— 108,800 $ 217,600 Bike Levy $ 75,700 $_ 87,000 $_ _ $,_ _ $^ 19,200 $ 181,900 T_0 T A L S $1,619,000 $2,873,500 $3,245,000 $4,324,000 $5,249,000 $17,310,500 i gl _ 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT:; BICYCLE PATH SYSTEM - STREETS DEPARTMENT: 'PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City-streets bicycle path system is designed to be complementary ;to the Greenwaybicycle path/trails system as an alternative transportation network in the City. , The provision of additional sections of bicycle paths to the existing street/bicycle network is determined in conjunction with planned street reconditioning and/or street overlay projects. Those projects identified for major reconstruction include funding provision for incorporation of a bicycle path in planned street work. Those projects identified' for interim improvements or asphalt overlays are 'designed to be fundedthroughadoption of a bicycle path levy. # #H X A k H Td M F(#x 34 PEi(i4 Df3t#Yc1hM M It X-Yc*-##M-X*)(1f H-)f-*K Y(*X M d 3E3#DFx}$##M#M#DI H x X X-X-K-x-x-)(-H**x***X## ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 Murdock St. from 98th to 103rd, 1500' @,$15 per lin.ft. $ 22,500 Sattler St. from 98th to Hall, 3400' @ $10 per lin.ft. 34,000 #`Hall Blvd. from Hwy. 217 to McDonald, 6400' @ ,$20 per lin.ft. 128,000 Phase II - FY 85-86 Fonner/115th from Walnut to Gaarde, 3000'' @ $15 per lin.ft. 45,000 Walnut St. from 106th to 121st, 3500' @ $12 per lin. ft. 42,000 Phase IIT - FY 88-89 # Pacific Hwy. from McDonald to Durham, 6400' @ $20 per lin.ft. 128,000 TOTAL $399,500: .• m •D[-M-M-)(-#-H-3E#�##K-H-DFId-k-H#-x-X=�E3(-M-�E-DE-DE#YEX-H-}F-M-DQiFk-�-M-x-M-M-Y(-#-YrxiFH-H-Df-M-HiEH-?4-H#-M-M#�i-#i�-Di-K-#-H-�-M-x-M#-AF;f?E•?Hf�•M3l-Df SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 85-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $_ $ $! $ City $ $__ $ $ $ $ Bike Levy $ 75,700 $ 87,000 $ $ $�19,200 $ 181,900 *MSDIODOT $ $ $ $ $ $ Grant — $ 108,800 $ $ $ $ 108,800 $ 21.7,600 T 0 T A L S $_184,_500 $ 87,000 $ $ $ 128,000 $ 399,500 'lf-!.•li li'�-?E-xat-3F-k x#x3�iHFDEiF-X•#-YH(-3�-K-H3c••�Hi-H-x#-if-3HS-3E x-x-x-x-K-�E-1E-x-K-x�(-X-x-li-x-x-Ycx-H-)(-M-Hx-x�k-x-M-H6x-X x-3FTFx-xx-x-lE�t-x-x-D(-x 3t)t• LOCATION JAN °° s. °°, =- Greenway ° ec oou >o°c > System � Proposed Bicycle Paths 0Q ® _ Completed 0 ® Q Bicycle Paths ° °poo ° x `•.. ` _ y - 8 8808°° °88° 8888° ° 6°88° ° °8°°8 0 [ 0 _ p2S • J 777JJJ i �` ® °VCO ° �O �I. , uU •� a � �° 8g g° t ��U 1�s 11 s. a x � • o � • ^}• ..`d °0800°88888888 o � c' r� =rte �� - �9 0 •off - • oo" 6 �v"�••-"""�� •of �'" \ �:�a° '� � � j FSCJNU I Up ►off _ �.� Vto �=UI`JII e J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PR03ECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREET OVERLAYS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—STREETS ;(213) PROJECT LOCATION: City—wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Asphalt overlays of selected streets. 10 -- 12 streets ' are designated annually for maintenance overlays; averaging 2 - 3 miles of roadway per year. Most likely funding sources for these projects would be the County Road Levy and State Gas 'Tax Fund. ESTIMATEOFPROJECT COST: Asphalt overlays — $100,000 per year @ ',5 years $500,000 TOTAL $500,000 'g-DF3t-B(x--�x�;-x#-:4#7E x#iE#HF xifi(-x-x-3fx-xif-x-DE x-x-H-H=i(-x x-Df H-H-x-x3E-H H x iE x#-x##�(H..DE 3F x-H x-iE-x-x'#•lE-)fiE�t-x x-x-#-x-x H#iE x H x� SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85_ ,FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY87-88_ FY 88-89_ TOTAL_ Federal $ $ $ $ $_ $ State Gas $ $ __ $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 City $ Cnty Rd Levy $_100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ 250,000 T O T A L S $. 100,000 $_120,CQq $_100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 Dt-Yc#iE-x#-3Ex�`ti(-x-x-##-H-x-x-?E-H#H-x-xif H-H-H)E-x-H-H#x-H-H-x-H 3(-'n'-x-x-#3F-H-M-x-H�f-Yr�f-x-}E-x-x•#-x=�(3Eit#x-Hif x-x H#-x-x#x-x H-x-H-x x-H� LOCATION: g . ff OWE I I M- 1—mmill ------- ME s t f; fi i' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: ASH AVENUE COMPLETION DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS , DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCI?TION: Ash Ave. , between Burnham St. and Hill St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ash Avenue to be extended and 'completed from Burnham St. to Mill St. ; a creek- crossing/bridge constructed over Fanno Creek; storm drainage improvement provided; curbs and sidewalks installed. Traffic signs, a traffic circle,' and other control features to be incorporated into project t to minimize adverse traffic impacts on adjacent Village Glenn neighborhood. Insofar as .this project entails the provision for excess Capacity usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 75% LID and 25% E Streets - SDC funding. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $160;000 i 950' @ $167 per lin.ft. Additional Traffic Control Features 233,200 � Creek'-Crossing/Bridge 231, 100 X41,100 R/W Acquisition Costs $669,000 # $ 334,500 Phase I - FY 84-85 334;500 Phase II - 'FY 85-86 TOTAL $ 669,000 # Note, Figures ,Do NOT Include Street Lights -0r Traffic Signals. X**X-k-x-x-x-)fat-lFx-f-k'X- SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86_ FY 86-87 f�Y 87-8Ei_ FY 88-89 TOTAL - Federal State $___ - $ - $._ _ - --— City_ $� - $- $ $ 167,25 $ 0 Streets-SDC $ 83,625 $ 83,625 $._ $ $ 501,750.. LID $ 250,875 $_250,875 $!---- �. $ $ T 0 TA L S $ 334,5Q0_ $ 334,500 $ - $ $____ $ 669,000 _ j #i4�43Eitkkx#D(}Ekk#YiikkkkkklE#4txkxkxxx-x-x-x-x-x-kaEkx}Fxxkk?FkXkkxxxkk}FkxkkkxDE3Exxxti�#Kk3E w LOCATION:!!- LEWIS _ 1 p m fa /UYALL sT. C Y LNSN TPNG£ Nw yy :�i r CcL� e. 4 V: _. FJ nl t /J�lI MEAOOW y A EL W.°^'^%XTRE L 31 �` sT. SPL.. 3 3 NII C PEEK / ` KLFNERINL CTT. Eq SiK o 6t w r� E s9l LY ST. 1_1•.1 'CYJZaOALT , T \ h E ST.N N v +.W. kM4030 .. NffT ry ` TS cMT R ~S Fti Sc SW.ARN ST. � pAf- R'Af 4VA. __ j �• S i \ T m® 6 ,?`�p S., SE SW � I� =oN, � cw. h Sip 'a ERNOL ST.—IQ, *<'ILtTO iz 5 NA: r a a p- ST =mATKiNs +01 3.W TONRER. .K �� SN. GRARi 1 S 5T. , f� —! P6Ot. OE!tA OEL � Q VVS77 �. 4r c\s SW. NM.L'S ST N F¢R 3TFAR, i P t C NOi A 0211011 + CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN � PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT : LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC; WORKS (LID) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local street/storm drainage improvements funded jointly i by the City and: affected property owners, according to cost-sharing policy s (15% City/85% local property owners) are provided for in an LID Reserve Fund. ! This Fund is based on the City's estimated share of projected -annual costs, � available for matching, if and when LID projects are completed. t -t #3i#HxxxxxxxxxxKxXHxx#kHxxxYExxHxHxfFxxxx xxHxH ExxHDdH?ExxxxxHxxxxM.xxD(xNHxWXxx-x##-xx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 85% Local Improvement District -$850,000 per yr. @ 5 years $4,250,000 15% City Share -- State Gas Tax - $150,000 per yr. @ 5 years 750,000 p r. TOTAL. $5,000,000 iiX#xxx�Fx�lxxxXxxx#XxxHx#)ExxX#x�(xxXxxxxxHxxXxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXaEXx xXxxxxHxxX* SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86_ FY_86-87FY 87-88_ FY._88-89 _i'OTAL__ Federal $- State Gas Tax $ 150,000 $ 150,0 $_ 150000 $ I50,000 $- 150_�OOQ $ 750,000 City -- $_ $ _ $_--- $— - $- -- $- LID $ $50;000 $ 850,000 $ 350,000 $ 850!000 $ 85000 $4,250,000 — — --- T O T A L S $1,000,000 $x,000,000 $.1,OOO,Qgo $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $51000,000 • ##•k-3E X-X X-l�x-Xi(-X-DE-xiE-X#-X�(H x-�#-x-X-xi4-H-K`X-H-X-1E?i X:rE-x x X-)E Y(x-X-x-x-bf-H xiF H-x X-x-X-x-X-x-Di-x-XX-x-X x x-x-�#H-X-x-X#-X-)(2E-H-X-x LOCATION: r s m �u m CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROTECT DETAIL PROJECT: FUTURE STREET PROJI'CTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS SIREE1S (213) PROJECT LOCATION`. City--wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Projects identified but riot, budgeted in current 5-year C.I.P. Pian. Streets° so identified are to: be improve(: to at Least minimum City; standards for designated classification, including curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, bicycle paths, and traffic delineators. Insofar as this project entails: the provision for excess capacity usage, the probable funding ' mechanism would be a :joint 'City/LID venture — 50% LID 'and 50% Streets RDC } funding, 4 x�c#Xuxu xx�ExxaExxxr�xxxxx�Exxxxx�ExxxxaE# xxxxxxXx#*xx-x-)4.-x#x-XXX-X-x-xxxxxx-xxxxxx-XXX"XXX ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Scoffins Street,' Hall Blvd. to 700' west (700') Pfaffle Street, Hall. Blvd. to Pacific Hwy. (2400') Oak Street, Greenburg ;Road to 71st Street (6900' ) Locust Street, Greenburg Road to 71st Street ;(6250') 80th;Avenue, Oak Street to Taylors Ferry Road (3800') § Hall Blvd.', Hwy 217 to Scholls Ferry Road (9600' ) _ Oleson Road, Hall Blvd. to 'Kennsington'Road ,(3440') Taylors Ferry Road, Oleson Road to 65th Street (7000' ) Washington Drive, Hall Blvd to Taylors Ferry Road '(1600' ) 3EkKiEXxH#2(M3EMMHx)(H:�EMNTE#KH NXiF#;(t(Yrx# DE IE #HiEMiFM#H iYEMM##MxDFY(DE HHH>FYhkKkS4yMK--X-X XXXX*XX , SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85_ FY 85-86_ FY 86-87FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL - i Federal $ _ $ — $ $ $— $ _.— State C _ i�_� $— --- $ ---_ $ Streets—SDC $—'---._._$ _ $_ —. $_.— $---- ..—. $_��.— LID �= $� $-- $_�_��_ $ -- ----$---u__— $_:_.—___..._._ $ T 0 T A L S $ $_— i4ifiEDCXiEXk3F3.M�E3E�(Y, ifiF�(xNX3EH?EIEXHKi{.HiEld#3(MY#iEDE3(MHX�f:fXMH?ENM)E#PE HK fI(M3txxHTE?fDEH-X-X•X-X-DF"X* " LOCATION R �n a i I E cff i MUM - -- CAPITAL IPIPR0VFJ"IEP6T PROGRAM PLAN i j " PROJECT DETAIL t a - STREETS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: BICYCLE PATH SYSTEM DIVISION: OPERATIONS--STREETS (213) }• -hide 1, PROJECT LOCATION: City ; PROJEt'T DESCRIPTION: The City"-streets bicycle path: system is desiyned to be bi.c cle path/trails system as an alternative complementary to the Greenway yOf transportation network in the City. The provision of additional sections in paths to the existing street/bicycle network is determined in bicycle P and/or street overlay _ conjunction with planned street reconditioning projects. Those projects id of fi icycle ed for npath inajor cplanned tstreet cwork.fu hose provision for incorporationhalt overlays are designed projects identified for interim improvements or asp to be funded through adoption of a,bicyc e path levy. 3SHH#HY1(HH#IEK#3Ejd'EH#?(HriHDEi(KKKHH#iK"'#KHHHHit"HH#HHtEHHH #HYHHHi(HHHH#HHHHHiEHH#'?tHHMH a ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Phase I - FY 84-85 per lin.ft. $ 22,500 ' Murdock St. from 98th to 103rd, 1500' @ $15 p 34,000 Sattler St. from 98th to 217 Hall, lMcflonald, 6400'p@r$20RPer lin.ft. 128,000 � Hall Blvd. from Hwy.... Phase II - FY 85-86 $15er lin.ft. 45,000 Fonner/115th from Walnut to Gaarde, 3000' 2 per P lin. ft. 42,000 Walnut St. from 106th to 121st, 3500' @ $12 per Phase III FY 88-89128 00 Pacific .Hwy. from McDonald to Durham, 6400' @ $20 per lin.ft, $399,500 TOTAL . #HH=k#HHit#HHHHHKKH E#HH3FH�SHHhHKSdHYcHHK* -K-HH-H?t-H-HHHH-H3- -fi-HHHHH#iEHHHH#1EHHHH4EHMKHHHHHH SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 8� 5_ 86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 T_ OTAL Federal_ $---- $---- $ -- $ State $ $--- - $— 19,2 0 $ 181 900_ City 75 700 $ 87,000 $_— $ $ $ *MSD/ODOT $ _ �_` $ los,soo $ 217,600. Grant — $ 108 800 $_— T0TPo- LS $ 1.84 500 $ 87,000 $ $ $ 128 000 $ 399,500 -1a-K-K-if#H=s(H-Y:-4Ef(-H#�-IEH-K-Hf-iE Tt#H#H j(-K�Hf#H-H#K-H-H-Hif-H#iE-K#iF�A3t }H¢3rH 1E3F!€-#-?t a-}t�•H-SEIt-H-H#3'FiF • LOCATION: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREET OVERLAYS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Asphalt overlays' of selected streets . 10 - 12 streets are designated annually for maintenance overlays; averaging 2 - 3 miles roadway per year. Most likely funding sources for these projects would be the County Road Levy and 'State Gas Tax Fund. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Asphalt overlays - $100,000 per year 5 years $500,000 TOTAL $500,000 , �HTk-H�4 H-H-H-Hi4-Hi(HHH-Yc#-H H-Pf-H-H-H-it-H-M-H H-H-H-H-H-YF#-IE.H M H-DFH-H-H-H-IE##-H-14#-#-H H 3(-H-H-H-Yi-?t-M-H-H-H-H-HiE-H-?(-H-H#H H-H-H-H-H-DE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN ., FY 84-85 FY 85-85 FY 85-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL ` . Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Gas $__ $ _ $$ 50,000 $$_1001000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 City $ $ Cnty Rd Levy $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ 250,000. T O T A L S $ 100,000 $ 100.000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 10o,000_ $ 500,000 id 3Qi�H Dtif 3SiHE x't3{H i 3E fE 1g#�EEE3f'(F4i(H M H#H H H'd 3Q�E x K H x H H H fit-##-H-H'R H H-M H-M-H**-X X-H-H'A H DFH#M H-H3i-M-H-H-H-D(-H-Jl.X*X LOCATION: i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: " PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: ASH AVENUE COMPI_EIION DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREEfS ,(213)' PROJECT LOCATION: Ash Ave- between Burnham, St and Hill St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ash Avenue eXconstruct-ed coveretFann oed e�Creek Burnhamstorm to Hill St.; a creek crossing/bridge drainage improvement provided; curbs and sidewalks installed. Trainto project ffic signs, e incorp a traffic orated circle, and 'other control is ontadjacent ures to bVillage Glenn neighborhood.e to minimize -adverse traffic impacts Insofar as this mE°h mectails hanism bees provision City/LID e capacity 75% L`IE)aand 25% probable funding Streets - SDC funding. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $160,000 950' @F $167 per lin.ft. 233,200 Additional Traffic Control Features 234,700 !' Creek Crossing/Bridge 41,100 R/W Acquisition Costs $669,000 #` $ 334,500 's Phase I - FY 84-85 334,`500 f Phase II - FY 85-86 TOTAL $ 669,000 Note, Figures Qo NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. No�te, Figures 00 NOT t#x�(xxxlEx)(xiEMx}E}4x#HiHfx#xxxxxxxx�f�(�(3(xxxx�H(It#xY# } SCHEDULE. AND FUNDING PLAN TOTAL FY 84-85 FY 85-85_ FY 86-8 7 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 - -_ - € Federal $ $-- $----- $ _ $_— — State $_______ _ $ -- $__ $ $ - City $ ------ $----- $__-_- $_ $ 167,250 Streets-SDC $ 83,625 $ 83 .625 $, - $- -- $ 501,750. LID $ 250 875 $ 250,875_ $_--- - -- $ $__-----.- z $ $ $ 669,000 T O T A L S $ 334__.500 $ 334 500 $ - • �c-x-x•a� , ` N.LEw15 C 11 /UYALL ST. LOCATION I „ A EL BRIM ]'62 ARO CT_ SY. . « o __ J\DAI y�A�e.T Y4jR0 ib V' H ]OAU' @.' y'�-.., S j S. LT FIAf.¢ 'La � s. (Y(' cnwa¢w sT l/ -wATKINs �� a`Q� ,• S'S��,C \� r,..�il S.w FONNEA � � ..44� w Gw+NY {:o-(jY+l•' � •`i'y{ii- Sw A OAAY.S ST. #¢ � o Sw. C4R ll F P 9t anolo� bi. �@''��'�,.•4�. $ L-� zw Rw �Fy ~ F f.f � �\\ . w `: 9P `,*. 4 t EI•a S.. Lw. i ( ','C fT'y OVPAw�_- � .�y Sw. ..T �'�/ •/ CAPITAL IMPROVEMEW PROGRAM PLAN { PROJECT DETAIL PUBLIC KS PROJECT : LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS DMNNT OPERATION-STREETS (213) (LID) wide jointly PROJECT LOCATION: City- Policy PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local street/storm drainage ton�cost-sharing P by the City and affected property owners, local property owners) are provided for in aected annual eCosts, (15% City/85% ,s estimated share of Projected This Fund is based on the City if and when LID projects are: completed. available for matching, x-x-kx-K-DEK-k#lEx-DE?(-H-H#-k-3(-x-x-Hif-x#xit-kx-H#�(xxx.)EHx-xkk-x#-xk-k-xk-x-?E##-x-x-x-x# - . ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: per r. � 5 Years $4,250.000 - $850,000 p y 5 year 750,000 85% Local Improvement District - 150,000 per yr. @ y 15% City Share State Gas Tax $ TOTAL $5,000,000 H-k�-x-x-x-k-x-x-H-%•#�f-xji-xx x3t-k-k-x�(-k-x x'A k•xif-x-x 1(-x-x-x-x-kl'.#F-x-xD H PLAN x x x-xx-x-x-x-k H-x-x-x DE-x-tt�(x-k H�eic-x x x-x-# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING LTOTAL._ FY 84-85 FY85—=86_ FY- 86-87 FY 81-88 FY f18-89 $ $ --750,000 -- 150,009 0 Federal 000 $ 1 $ 150 O00 $ $ State Gas $ O 8 05 O 00 $4 250 OOO $-85 0 a� 85_0.00 $�850 000 $ 850,000 $ - LID TOT R L S $1,OQo 00Q $1�Oao,OOo_ $1 0_.00 000 $1,000,000 $1,000-,000 $5,000,00 3HE 9E Kid-1EM'r(-1E3ix-x-k3fx-x-x�`c-k•}E-x-x-�x#-lEa4-?d-)4-x-k3l-DEx K DE k-H#x-x 3(i4�E•H-)Ex-k x-x-xif-'.4-k-x'A-i4•K�t x H-x-ki(-x-x K-H�(-x-x Yck-;ElEx-X x LOCATION: NO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: DURHAM ROAD RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Durham Road between Pacific, Hwy. & Hall Blvd. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City' standards for a collector: street. Improvements will includecurbs, sidewalks and storm drainage. The existing non-standard bicycle path will be improved to ;City standards with traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of additional right-of-way to uniform collector standard of 60' may be required. Existing right-of-way ,varies between 40' and 90' along Durham Road. Insofar as ;this project entails ;the provision for, excess capacity 'usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint-CITY/LID venture 75% LID and 25% Streets SDC funding. iE-x#'R-x-x-x##34 Yc-x fF x-x-x-x x-x-x x�(-x-x-x-x-3Fx-x-x x-x x-x�l x-x jt-x-x-x x-x x-x x x x x_x x 1(-x x-DE-x-)s-x x�#x-x-x x#-x x-x x-x-x-x-x x-x-jE xx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: ( i 8200' @ $167 per lin.ft. = $1,370,000 i Phase I - FY 85-86 $ 685,000 Phase II - FY 86-87 685,000 I TOTAL $1,370,000 Note Figures Do NOT include street lights and traffic signals. 'R3f-3Hi-x-xif-x-x-x-x#-x-x x-x-�(#-�x-x-x#�4•#�E-x�E•x-x-x-x�(-x�(-x-x x�x-xaE�f-�(-x jf-x#x-Sf-x 3E-x-x�E•�E x-xiE-3f#i(#x-x-?(xif-xx x x-x-x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88--89 TOTAL _ - Federal $ $ $—_. $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ — Cita _ $ $ $ $_ .—. $ $-- Streets-SDC --streets-SDC $ $_ 85,000 $_ 85,000 $__ $ $ 170,000 LID $ $ 513,750 $ 513,750 $ $` $1,027,500 Street-GO Bnd $ $___.86,25O $ 86,25 $ $ $ 172,500 T 0 T A L S $` $ 685,00 $__685 00 $ $ $11370,000 , #JtMDSxxx3Ex3£xxK#ifxxxxxxxxx-x-X*WX- *X-D(xxxx##i(xxxJExxxx3fxxxx##xX#xxxxxxx3(xD(xxxxx3(xxlf3fx LOCATION: XRCES LP CE i. 3 1\\/// 0 tall a4 "Ew TEH ACE ag.W INET ST + At 3 S.W. B NT } PY y i �� o � iNEz 5 ---- s --n--" Pc z Ro. LH. �"'�-�^�'�PENfN200K ; +. ST £ W i A d. 9TR T NS w. ; PIXEBHOO S t' IEiLIXO -V LNOHTE •�/('J/�T I s.W. NooeY!Ew y zr it i 11 s r_ s It ST rRiwE 3 ` W .}r T[ FN %J �•-g rORRIRN PL.: DORM" AF Ri \;"oy t� .«.e:v.«e e.+`�•9 V u �s � � ��r. s � F — � �i i� � ''� \ . a SW QURNAiF HA. ey1 SE PP t S ICT U IS W COOK.' 9T-- r' - :OCT,' Ct ULIry IST, i E- 1 f S E f . CAPITAL IMPROVEMEUT PROGRAM PLAN i PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: DOWNTOtJN ON-OFF RAMPS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ! DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) i PROJECT LOCATION: Pacific Hwy. to Commercial Street and Tigard Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On-orf ramps to be constructed to facilitate access to downtown area from Pacific Highway. ntails the provision for excess capacity usage, the Insofar as this project ei t probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 67% LID and 33% P Streets - SDC funding, r x-x-x-x-x x-x-xx-x-x-x-x-x-xx-x-x-�x-x-x-rc-x-x�-x-x-x-x-xas-x-x-x-x x-x'x-x-x-x�-xx x_x-xx x-x-x-x-x-r.-x-x'x-x-x-x-ic-x-x-x-x-x�c x'x'x-x�'x-x-�x x-x-x 1 ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 352,000 Phase I' - FY 85-86 352,000 Phase TI - FY 86-87 TOTAL $ 704,000 #-Ai-xa4#x-x-x#x'x3F'x�x-x-x-x3t�Fx->t��-x�t-x-x-x-x-x-x�f-DF➢c-x x-x-3i'i4•it-DE-x-x-x-xit-x H-x-xx-3E-5(-x PF-x-�-3Fi43t-Yrx-x-u"x-x-x x�F-x-x-x-Yc•�Ex x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 855-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88iII� TOTAL . Federal State $ $------ $ $ $ $ city $ -0- $ 00' _ 44,0 $ $�-- $ 44.000 3 Streets-SDC $ $ $ 528 000 LID $ $ 264,000 $ 264,000 $________ $---- $ 132,000 Street GO Bnd $$ $$ 98 000 $ 44 000 $ $ i $ $ 352,000 $ 352,000 $ $_ $ 704,000 " T 0'T A L S $ $ c a�-x•�c-x-x-x�t-x�x-x-x-x-xaFx'x-x-x'x-x�c-x-x-x-x-x-�e�x-x-x-x'r�x-xae x'r�x-x-x'x-sc x-x-rix-x-x'x-x-x-�t-max•-�x-x'x�-x-xx-x-x-x-x-x-six-x-xx x-��x f LOCATION: v hC n � C « LFNis ii• N_ 11_ /i.-c-LN- �. LR l CLI xti*1 1` �1 /,q`7�/aEA00w p` � _� J !L\ y 4R CT rIG< Fqw h e S°f [i S:S LI ST. AC GT. M^ I i � S'4 5.n. SI„ �CAa050 N4T kj � �W J ♦ ' Sw � l 9t B y�J S � ya sN ERnnL s:. yr, <.y�'r �. vis O1ix .. k55 SN' EA ST %N µT GSW. e 3 d9 `' i 1 fR: f CJ ppa:a `NATK!Rs .PJ � /`s� . S.N PORKER sN._ .VAWNC 5f. sTC RQ �Illl n u�4N. F1RR F ST. � �� 1 +;a � a r sT. 8T .Q t, � �1� LR• rt �/Sa�P dOP HI. N..C. OStAAI �. SM 1. q gin IR c 1 �„. r_ 4 �c �..__ �a �, �. . . � CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: N. DAKOTA ST. RECONDITIONING ' DEPARTMENT: 'PUBLIC 'WORKS ` DIVISION: OPERATIONS--STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: North Dakota St. between 115th Ave. & Tiedeman Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at ,least minimum City standards for, a 'collector street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of additional right-of-way from existing 40' 45' to collector standard of 60' may; be required. Insofar: as this project entails the provision for excess' capacity usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding. #-1�#-X-x-x-x�txataEx-x-)t#-x-x•#-x-x-;�•x-x#at-x-x-�x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x x#•x-x#x-xac x x-x-x x-x->:x-x-xx-x-x-x-x-x-,t-x-x#-x-x x-x x-x-x-x x-x xx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 3780' @ $167 per lin-ft. = $630,000 Phase I - FY 85-86 $ 315,000 Phase II FY ,86-87 315,000 *Note, figures do NOT include street lights or traffic signals. TOTAL $ 630,000 ##�l-K-x-x-x-x-X-x-x-xii#x-)E-x-x#-x##-x-x#-x-14313E#-7f 3(-x-?f-)(-xif-x-1(%-n x-x-x-`oE#-x-x-xiHt-xiE-#-x-x-x-x-M�E.l(x-x�E x x�-?E#-x-x x-x•M x#x x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN " FY 84-85_ FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY '88-89 TOTAL__ Federal $; State $- $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $__ $- $- $ Streets-SDC $ $ 56,375 $ 38,750 $ _ $_ __ $_ 95,125 LID $ --$ 236,250 $ 236,250 $ $_ $ 472,500 Street-GO Bnd $_ $ 22,375 $ 40,000 T 0 T A L S $ $ 315,000 $ 315,000 $ $_ $ 630,000 DHFH x x x x-x-X X-X--"x#-x-x-x-x-****-WK-K K**X-*x'k#x x x x x x x YE#x,Dhx)E YF x It x x'!tt x x;E Yrx-#-x-X x x x x x x x xiE#x x)tiQ x M lE LOCATION: \ S £W RORO��_ ENS / CW " � --_- iLENH4' � NI �26 -rT , 2T 126 t NI 33 3a \ J4 3i !S SW LOCUT,, ST. To II T MRPLF-L£RF� ST____ N._��' r 1 F- . $W. 1 SW. OAK ST. N .✓/�.Y_ �..t �+ —� Sri. [.�- ICKK.XOR' etc;` r \e SHn:v lrPNE HCH T"-" wI6F1 ^' 4 �tc fa[ 4.W. fi .TRORN ST. - C 5 LOHOSTpFF STEVE � Y iL S w. ne ., (wT) ST NdYt DIST^� " \� ._ utNZaNin a \ `I, �•� - 3 m f i Imo•`__—I M C„ 6K. • ST, I Sw. NCRI RRKT 1ST._- S 3 I NORTH ORKOTR L �� iQCAC'F-LILY CIR SW. ....r..�__.'TT � 21i oI I -E 4- 7 _ RLHEAhA c W m Sw. PFM T y E .icey RT TIRARO LF'FIS w..[a 11 fla SIZM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: STREET OVERLAYS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City–wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Asphalt overlays of selected streets.: 10 - 12 street's are designated annually for maintenance overlays; averaging 2 3 miles of roadway per year. Most likely funding sources for these projects would be the County Road Levy and'State; Gas Tax Fund. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Asphalt overlays —$100,000 per year,@ 5 years $500,000` TOTAL $500,000 �(H M It x DFx#lEit x#9FiH4 x iE H H x iY x x i(#3f�FH#H x#x x#�E x x x x-H-H-x-H-K*it#x## )(K H BE x x Hi(Dk##'k x)E x)t x#x x H x►F xit Di x iV SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Gas $ $ $ 50,000 $100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 Citv $` $ $ $ $ $ Cnty Rd Levy $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ 250,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $_100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 #-x-ki-ti-x-H-x-lfx-H•x-xiH4-3;-M#3fiHt#3Q•H#x:{-H-x-x-x�i#H•)f-x-x-x#-x-x-x#-H-dt-x34-x i(-)E�i-x-H-x-x-x-xiE-x-H#x-X-x-kd-x-x3d-H-?i,�t-x-#-H-x#Hit•i(-x LOCATION: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: LOCAL IMPROVEMENI DISTRICTS DEPARTMENT. PUBLIC WORKS : (LID) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Local street/storm drainage improvements funded jointly by the City and affected ' property owners, according to cost-sharing policy (15% City/85% 'local property owners) are provided for in an LID Reserve Fund., This Fund is based on the City's estimatedshare of projected annual costs, available for matching, if and when LID projects are completed. #iE#yYXXxiEXxX#x#HHxHx#HH#xxxxxxxxXx#xxxxxx#XXNxxDExxxx#-H-xX-#-x-X##xD(xKxxx)(Xi(Xxxx�tXHx ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 85%- Local Improvement District - $850,000 per yr.'` @ 5 years $4,250,000 15% City Share - State Gas Tax - $150;000 per yr , @ 5 years 750,000 TOTAL $5,000,000 x-x�c-�-x-X-x-x-x-H-X-x-x-X-�-x-x X-x#-qac Xac#-x-x•x-x-X-x X-�x-x-x-x x�x#-X-x-x-X-X-X#tt-x-X-x-x X-x-x-rc-x-x-x-u�sx-x-x-x-X-x x-X-X-x-x�c x x x x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN R" FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Gas ax $ 150,000 $_ 150 000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $. 150,000 $ 750,000 T City $_ $ $ - $ $ $— LID $ 850 a00 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $4,250,000 TOT A L S $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000 000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,00 X-X;<--X-x-x-X-X-x Y*"-X*X-x-x-X-X"-X:c-X h*K-X-X-x-x-x LOCATION: M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: DURHAM ROAD RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Durham Road between Pacific Hwy. & Hall Blvd'. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for a collector street. improvements will include curbs, sidewalks and storm drainage. The existing non-standard bicycle path will be improved to City standards with ' traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of ;additional night-oF-way to uniform collector standard of 60'. may be required. Existing right-of-way varies between40' and 90' along Durham Road. Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess capacity usage, the ;probable funding mechanism would be a joint CITY/,LID venture"- 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 8200' @ $167 per lin.ft`. = $1,370,000 # Phase I FY 85=86 $ 685,000 Phase II - FY 86-87 685.000' TOTAL $1,370,000` Note Figures Do NOT, include street lights and traffic signals. #-#-H-M-x-M-M-M-li-3f-DE#-M-N M�4i(i(-N-D(-M-H-M�-M-1t-x-1(-Df-3d-Pf-M-Di-34-x-K-DQ•if#-H-Df-D4it#PEK-tQ-M#-iHS###X#-x-1£-kiE Xi4-x-3fiQ##H-M-N AE#-x-x x x x x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85_ FY 85-86_ FY 86-87 FY 87=88_ FY 88-89 TOTAL— Federal State $ $ — City $ $_ — Streets-SDC $__ $_ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ $ $ 170,000 LID $ $ 513,750 $ 513,750 $ $__ $1,027,500 Street-GO Bnd $ $— 86,250 $ 86,250 $ $ $ 172,500 T 0 T A L S $ $ 685,000 $ 685,000 $ $ $1,370,000 **.X-X-3t-"#x-x**Y-X*-*X#-x-M-3(-fit#-"**X x-"-X-X X)(**##H**X-x D(x ?f x YcKit DEM Dt#iEi(tt x WX X.'+X-Df-#-x-1Ex-x i**-x**M x LOCATION: 1 Y ._ ____�-= �s i hR�5 [R `/ ,��(��ESR /�\ w L �C A. - '^ �. 1 RM F o P 'Tb vrtw Tf.R CE S.w INCL fT s.w. B N t ACE sw SO�p -- LJ ....-... rcz - s 6f Ro. .rT •,a' r cN. sw n rENORaoa i-lJ 9TR T a Nf w. 4 FIN[YRG w ..�ro n r,C['ll"C0..: O� «ST 1 ' h CT £ ctu• KWNE DR cl r 11 fw " sAT TI ERa �... woovuw y Ross sT , i, asw Rae[ swa E sr s - +r a 1 1 1 3 ! LU.. C�tllJ .. _ J/I w.0 4• t�� • ��i ////�/'�/�'�p'� OORRURN 1 f p B ►�i �� ) 6 M RO 1 Va1< �T +COOK/ ST— y 'DCT r' j UA f$ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM'! PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: DOWNTOWN ON-OFF RAMPS DEPARTMENT . PUBLIC WORKS -DIVISION:, OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Pacific Hwy. to Commercial Street and Tigard Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On-off ramps to be constructed to facilitate access to E downtown area from Pacific Highway . Insofar as this, project entails the provision for excess capacity usage; the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 67% LIU and 33% ' Streets -'SDC funding. X H_K•H-H-H-H-#-X-X-M-M-H ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $ 352,000 Phase I - FY 85-86 352,000 Phase II FY 86-87 TOTAL $ 704,000 #-3Ht-M-H-#3f-H##?f-1£-4(i(-H'.#iFiI-X-XiE•#-iEiEi(-H EiE-H-�f-9f-TE-H#-H#-H-H-X-H�E�E�E-�-)t-H-Hi(i(-Xil-iQ X-3r3i-H H-#iHE#>EH 1[-X-H-X->(-H-X -*X•H H'lE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL IL FederalStat $_ $ $ $ $ $ City e $ $ 44,000 Streets-SDC $ $ -0- $ 44,000 $ _ $ $ 264,000 $ 264,000 $_. $ $_ 528,000 LID $ ,000 $ 44,000 $ $ $ 132,00 88 Street-GO Bnd $ $ $ T O T A L S $ $ 352,000 $ 352,000 $ $ $ 704,000 LiE'M-DE3k-3tiE-Hi<•3E-M-T�-#•X-1�#1EAEi#-X-#i!-iE�;4X�EM-3(-H-H-Hii-H-�-X-1FH'if-ttiE•H-H-X-X-H9EH-X-DF#iE-H-'k#i#-H-H-1E-PFiY�:-X-Diii•�-X#i'E�3f N-HiHEii-X-lEft-if LOCATION: v' _� �w ' / •9 -ALL sr. A / IYY.,LP��i1! ` „I� ~ .. .-_„ST • YL4f S -(Jr � 5 16 /�/ J\ �1��rp\ { r� � --�KIR1�ReA Si�� k x �• � •� ( [J A ry�' q0 J '�•S La ST. f tT RQ€�{S�.��. SL a `1 fl Y fin• 5 4 `/ Q.F Sr t NTFz050 WAY SW.ANb ST. 'e Mk ,� TO AQ 44 \ WT �' ♦ U fY. yab `l l� -GAIT -`YlA s.IMt sr rowvfA /' yw GNAT {. it ST GPH�T OLn11+ DEL � 9",�s 1 -d3 S1 `/ i tllf qi iT fi o n Sr. fT ` q rFI p. R _ q 4„ � �,b,i i.L�n�. i � v'A6 O4 •e11... �W. OiaARn � �«�5 S W. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT : N DAKOTA SI . REC;ONDITIONLNG DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION. North Dakota St. between 115th Ave. & Tiedeman Ave. PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards' for a collector street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, ; storm drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. ` Acquisition of additional right-of-way from existing 40' - 45' to collector standard of 60' may be required. Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess capacity, usage, the probable `funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 3780': @ $167 per lin.ft. -- $630;000 Phase I FY 85-86 $ 315,000 315,000 Phase II - FY 86-87 *Note, figures do NOT include street lights .or traffic signals. TOTAL $ 630,000 :c x-x-x-x-x-x-�t-x�c x-x-x#jt-x-x x-xat-k•*at-rix-x�-x-x�x x-x#�s*"x x-x-Dc-x-x-x-x-x x-x-x-x scat-x-x x it-x#x-x-x-x x-x-x#x-x-*�c-x#�xx x x-x SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL_ Federal $ _ $_ $— $ $ $ State $ $ $_ $ $ $ City - $-- $ $ $ $_ $ Streets-SDC - $__—$_ 56,375 $_38,750 $ $ $ 45,125 LID $ $_236,250 $_236,250 $_ $ $ 472,500 Street-GO Bnd $ $ 22,375 $____40,000 $ $ $ 62,375 T 0 T A L S $ $ 315,000 $ 315,000 $ $ $ 630`000 �rx-x-#F#x iQ-xii-lc ihx#'•d-K�i-x�-x-x-DHE##�Fxit-x-x-x-x#tt#-x-!E AFx-x-x#'A xiS-xUit-x-x#x-x-x-x-x-x#�Ex-x-)Ex-i(-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-it-x-x"fit-x-xac BONDERS ST.\ LOCATION: LENVdN sT_ �ze Sw sw i-w SYt �! LOLU^ f Si. � { 31 ]d 4 CPP - N-:�j IF] SW DAN ST �/ I IG� t CO a _ •, ( ��` 1 xl r. SNa Ci4PNE 1 �I Y` Sa. 6 f10Ny ST. ` IfdaYt Bfd � - e ud 2 NITN •^ �L� S i9T ! V CIP 3 xuXl 'a'I st�-`)XS. HOxTN ,e I j' y R -� NINIiN Dd%QT♦ ` (((�- eT,•••�•7••.•ZT 21T T,4L C, oo sl 4.T J I-i v d�K•LNFwrryA = u \ i Yf+ FdF a 0 TI9140 _aST, 9C tT Sw S .•. ��' ,yENCRESf rtWtY�� J •1�— (F® LF.w15 [` k `1 CAPITAL If°iPROVEMET4T PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL ( tiDITT.ONING 1 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: 72ND AVENUE RECO DIVISION:_ OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: 72nd Avenue between 99W and Highway 217 <e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for a collector street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acauisilion of i additional right–of–way, from existing 40' -- 50' to collector standard of 60' may be required.- Insofar as this project entails the ;provision for excess capacity usage, ,the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture – 75% LID and 25% Streets = SDC funding. _•Yl-x-x-x-)Ex•�-N•x-x-x-x-x-x#x-x-x x-x x-x x-x-x-x-x x-x x-x-x=iF>Fxi(-x x-x-xx-3Ex-x-x-x-x x-x#x-x-S�3l-x-x-X x � �4xxxx3EitxMxlEjEx1( #Xxxxk ; ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4400' @ $167 per lin.ft. _ $733,000 # $ 366,500 Phase I – FY 86-87 366,500 Phase II – FY 87-88 TOTAL $ 733,000 Note, figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. x�x�t x-x-x-x#xac•xx-x-x-x-x-x-x-x3i�xa�-x-x xis-x•x-x-x-x x�-x x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x x-�s�-X x-x-x-x x-x-x-�x-xx-x-x-x x-x-at-x-x-xx x-x-x�-x x X* µ SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN I - FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY '87-88.; FY 88-89 TOTAL _ Federal State Cites $ 45,000 Streets–SDC $ $ $ 45,000 $ —o—— $ LID $_ $ $ 274,875 $ 274,875 $ $—549,750 $ $ 46,625 $_ 91,625 $_ $ 138,250 Street–GO Bnd $ — $ $ $ _ } $ 36600 $ 366x500 $ $ 733,000 T O T A L S $ $ i •x-x-x-x-x-x•x-�x-xx-xic-x-;�-x-st-x-��t-x-x�c-x-x-x-xat•x-x-x-x-x-t,-x-xx-x-x-x-x-xxx�t-xx-xx-x x-x-x-xxa:-x-x-xxx-x-x-x-xx-x-x-x-x x-x-x-x-x-x-x I 1 �u�.a6rLOCATION: vR �r•,a • �� LtYE, ,9,w AYE. R AVE. fYi \. -_• -� 5.W TA,� AVE __. — r s tl6AVE• N — I'VE, /o _- \ f" \.. ♦ [ o AVE. Qw i 5.N TYjg AVE!! r- \\ `AYE. 4w [J. [A' O ; __...-�A11,�g_.11C� s.l� \, '� T0,6 6Y6. AVE --••r^y-- .t�Mt ,p Lv.l 111!_L. 6 WF EJ K - � PARX*6, 65, s� r , CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PR07ECT DETAIL T PROJECT: GREENBURG RD, RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT • PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: ' OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION:' Greenburg ',Road between 99W and Hwy 217 , PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City .standards for a collector `street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, and traffic 'signs. Existing right-of--way allowances of 60'--65' meet t ional acquisition of right-of-way will not collector street standards and additf be necessary. Insofar as this project entailsthe provision for excess capacity usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint r City/LID s venture -%75% LID and 25% Streets SDC funding. 4 #-H-x#x-X-H-x#x H#x-x#?Ex-x x##X-x x-x X x-x-H-x 1(-x x-X 3(-x x-x xx#x DEx x x-x DEDE x-x-x-x-x-x-)E`xjE H#`x-x-X-K x-x-x x x-X YEx#x X x�i-x X ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: e 5100' @ $167 per lin.ft. , - $853,000 Phase I - FY 86-87 $ 47-6,500 "Phase II FY 87-88 426,500 TOTAL $ 853,000 E ,Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals x#x�E#=A3f�tM#kxXMH'YE3F3F# jE#XXxxaExx#1Ex�Ex3fxif3txxTEDfxXHHxHif#kxxXxxxKx Mx xx#xxifxxxx xxxX* SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 64-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY'87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL_ Federal $ $ State $ —__ $_� _ $___ $_ $ Cites $ $ — Streets-SDC $_ 37,250 $ -0- _ $_ _ $_ 37,250 K LID $_u $�_--- $_319,875 $_ 319,875 $ $ 639,750 Street-GO Bnd $_- $ _ $ 69,375 $ 106,625 $ $ 176,000 _ 4 $_ — $ $ ` $ $ T 0 T A L S $ $ $_ A26,5 $ 426,500 $ $ 853,0_ € .x�x#x-�.x#xr�x-x-x-x#x#x-H-x-X��c-x#x��-x�x-X-x-x`X#x-xX-x-;c��-x�x-x-x-X�c•x#x-x#x-X-x-x-x-x-x#xjc-x-�x-x-x-x-x-�x-xH•x LOCRTIO.1: __ Ell _ - r --------------- CS. OAST L44PLELE4F 3;ii ST G N ((� ��y. �f• \ ... OS i r. �-( , ` w 1� sw. �:= ^�wE 1 L_�� ST. �R 1 (¢ �L–_..–•,1 J IS�pC�l _ ST 9c a 1! ^+HiOv�aNE h�M a Ti.W S.W.TNORN;4T ' Lent et /„ LONG`wn at 5TESt = d i �–� Sw. NORT O4K�l ..ST. NMTR 001A � .•_�-{••.'i'r ;�1 J PFif FLE ST. S.W. roil 4rLANT4 A .w. rw4Rp sT. a ` t4 S. f OATLCR ¢T sCn T'f� m J al 1 E w Lius ... . =v.,� it ouviu sr. SW X11Sit a < t 11 �� ME40JwA .L JJJ ST r i a rL.� S SI S6 ruau Na ST!! T 9u KFTw�RIN 2 _ w 3 —_-- JAR SW F,Z, / 1 55 \,4 KrR rTOw. Ey pf ! 5W 3 W C rOF50i lELMw`J�?•? i 4\ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT:DETAIL PROJECT: STREET OVERLAYS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City:-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: _ lsphalt overlays of selected streets. 10 - 12 streets are designated annuaily for maintenance overlays; averaging 2 - 3 miles of roadway per year. Most likely funding sources for 'these projects would be the County Road Levy and State Gas Tax Fund ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: $500,000 Asphalt overlays - $1o0,000 per year 5 years TOTAL $500,000 #-x x-Hif-x-x-lE xi(-x-x-x-iE#x####-x-x-H•�(-)(#�E-x=r�x-x-x-x K x�t-x x x-x x x-x#-x#X#-Xx-x�Fx x x x#-x-x#x x-xiE#-x-x-x-H-#-x#x-x-x xi(-x-X SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87` FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL _ < Federal $ $ $ $ $— $ State Gas $_ _ $ ,_ $ 50,000 $ loo 000 100,00 $$ 250 000 City $ $ $—. $—.- -- �nty Rd Lev $ 100,000 $ 100 000 $ 5o,000 $_ $ $ 250,000 T o T A L S $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100 000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 �a-x-x-x-x-�-x-x�-�taa x-x-x-x�a-x�x-x�caac�-�e-x-x-x x�-X-x-x-x-x-x x-x-H-x-x�-x-x-x�-X-:e-x-x-x-x-x x-x-x x x x-x x-x-xx-x-x-x�c-x-x x•x-x-x-xac�x-x LOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: LOCAL IMPROVEME.NI DISTRICTS DEPARTMENT ; PUBLIC WORKS (STD) DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: city-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Localstreet/storm drainage improvements funded jointly by the City and affected property owners, according to cost-sharing policy (15%'City/85% local property owners) are provided for in an LID Reserve Fund. This Fund is based on the City'sestimated 'share-of projected annual costs, available for matching, if and when LID projects are completed. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 85% Local Improvement District - $850,000 per yr. @ 5 years $4,250,000 15% City Share - State Gas Tax -;$150,000 per yr. @ 5 years 750,000 TOTAL $5,000,000 �(Hat H K H H Had H'f?t#Hif H H HiEH D4 H�{it H H H?i Hit H H H 3(if H H�E3Fx#�F H 3fH x ilii H Hi1-H H H.H_H-X*X-K*-X-X it-H**H-x-H XX_X X x x X* y SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN .• FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY,.87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ _ $ $ $_ $ $ State Gas Tax $ 150,000 $x150 000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 750,000 City — $ $ LID $ 850,000 $!850,000 $$ 850,000 $$ 850,000 $$850,000 $4,250,000 $ $ $ $ $ TOTALS $1,000,000 $1,000,00 $1,000,000 $1,000 000 $1 000,000 $5,_000 qOO ##iE#aHt-tEit?t K X—H-3EX-i2-DEH-9HE3t H-Hit#:-Yc:(-D(-H-?Q-H-3f-H-itiE Yc31-X-H-H-H-H-H H-Bt#i(-H•H-it H-H-X-H-)(-H-H-Y-)Ht-H 1Htit#X-H-HiEXi(-H-3E#-X-M it-X-H-H LOCATION: l t =' T A, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA?l PLAN 4 PROJECT DETAIL DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT: 72ND AVENUE RECONDITIONING DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION 72nd Avenue between 99W and Highway 217 ', standards �. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City for a collector 'street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition oil additional right-of-way; from existing o project a Otails the l�provisioctor n dfor exGeof os may be required. Insofar as this P mechanism would be a ''joint City/LID . capacity usage, the probable funding venture -'75% LID and 25% Streets SDC funding. lQ-)t-R-3E#-x M-N-IE�i-YC#-x-x-x-x K-x-iEit-x-DE3f-x#x�E � V -,�#3Ei4-x-#-x-)i-)c#3c-H#1E-3Q-M-x-fE;Ex#K#D�-fit-tFiHt-K-x-�dit#x#)4-x-x-x-tt-M-K-x-�'M € ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4400' @I $167 per lin.ft. _ $733,000 x $ 366,500 Phase`I - FY 86-57 366,500 Phase;Il -'FY 87-88 TOTAL $ 733,000' * Note, figures Do NOT Include Street xx�t�txxttxxMugx�tt or Traffic Signals. #x-X-Kx-"-xis x xu�tx#�tt3t�t t#xrt�txx t� #rx-M-x-K iFit�H Eif-M-�DE-M SCHEDULE AND ,FUNDING PLAN FY_ 84`_85 Ey 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $.__---_ $Stat $�__ $ City $ $ $ $ -0-__ $ 4 Streets-SOC $_ _ —$_,-- $ 45,000 $ $ 549,750 LID $ $ $ 274,875 $ 274 875 $_______— $ 138,250 Street-,GO Bnd $ $$ $ 46,62 $ 91,625 ----- $-------- . . TOTALS $�.—.. $ $ 366,500 $ 366,50 $ 7331000 3'rHif�(3#JL-M-iE3fH'H'•4'iE3t-??i{-i(-'tS�hM-H-Tt-M-i(#K-Nfi(if.-DEY-H-�ii-K-)(-DE�-D(#X#K�-24�F1##-R-)HFM#1(3f ii-Df;i-}(-�Hf-Y.-YEi(-1{"Hif'X-4l-Ki4•!"r�H'3f#D!- s. sz N.„.A LOCALOCATION: Avf.va / � U.,A Sa. aeD a ,< \ _ --- s.+a. T91A Ave: i -•_• S.v T•MAve1,h Ave __ --� ( / t � � 1 t- pfd S '� \� Sv` T•1! --- - AVE O `. cif r T2n i AVf I.;= —A . ~ Y9 LYR...J • � '�y,� � 1.---e� CAPITAL IMPROVE14ENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT:DETAIL PROJECT: GREENBURG RD. RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Greenburg Road between 99W and Hwy 217 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for a collector' street, Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, and traffic signs. Existing right-of-way allowances of 60'-65' meet collector 'street standards and additional acquisition of right-of-way will not be necessary. Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess capacity ;usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint- City/LID venture - 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding. #FX-X-X X-X-XiFX-X-x-M-X-X-)E-?(-1(�E#iF'K-X-DE X-X-X"DEic-X-X X-3EX#X-X'x-X iC-x�E;E-X-39 X-X-X�-X-k Yci(-X X-X X iF�x-X-X-x-x-X'X-x-x-DE X-x-DEx-X-X 3C-Mii-X x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 5100' @ $167 per lin.ft. - $953,000 # Phase I -'FY 86-87 $ 426,500 426,500 Phase II - FY 87-88 TOTAL $ 853,000- * Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ 37,250 Se trets-SDC $ $ $ 37,250 $ -0 $� - —639,750- $ 319,875 $ 319,875 $ $_ Street-GO Bnd $ $_69,375 $$ 106,625 $_ $ 176,000 $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ $ -$ 426,500 $ 426,500 $ $_853,000 . jEY/+�i"�-iqc�K/S��I-PfDS-X##D(#-Y-'sf-b<X-X-X-YF3(-K#Zf-ZE�f-X-X-iE�f-X-Dd-DHE#-IEX-X-X�iFX-YFX-�i-X-X-X-X-lEifiE-X-3(-X3(-X-H X-}(-1{-14Y-1`c3(3i-X-K-Xit-SEXat-'s(X-Xit' ! IT J T -_— --�-- _ 1 1 eS Y.1 ^O Epl`6 OAK 1 90 t Oar. OAK ST „ lr[ \\ sn. �'�{\ a ❑� PIKE 1' � SY. m �r F RIV, SN .We Hyo .yc N Sp TYOIrN/ST .THORN'ST_ <rrtr j o �'— LOMaSTAFF STEVE • f,V ire K NORTH OAKOTA w ST 1 SW N:RT DAK0�.1__�,_ST. # 3 T ; O<•'PP+ # / _ S A'��,< Yr• Pi4izlC ST. St#. N41 PTLAMTA Pr `U SY'. T.".0 ST. 5.is. ff ¢AYLCR ST 'r S Sar La S b'. z¢�,+{'w. T.� LEYNS rwul w pgt.1� �j^ Q11 T \`ld� WVALL fT. gar,'y,,r �,Tj�� ///}}}.� LYale Iu1GE ga �r• Ir ii CLIdTOY1 ST� moi! .lj YFAdTM y /� !1 a e f! J Tc+iid:rn xT��. y n, c► 4<,4 r _ — l F..� _� f CT 0 jOLAC Cmc .....! �..;. p/W.'.> l+T"]'.: S ♦.1 _ ...a.. .°:'. �i• I t�i4R _... �. MR CAPITAL IMPROV PROC-RA14 PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: 'HALL BLVD. RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: 'Hall Blvd. between Durham Road & Hwy. -217 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for an arterial street Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage," bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acquion of siti additional right-of-way to uniform arterial standard of 80' - 100' may be required. Existing `p-ight-of-way varies between 40' - ''851 . Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess capacity usage, the probable funding mechanismwouldbe a joint City/LID venture - 67% LID and 33% Streets SDC funding. x xx 3tMxxlaxx..... FxxxuDFDFDHEx4HcxXxx�txiEDt##�f�iM'�txaE?f ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 11,056' @ $250 per lin'.ft. _ $2,764,000 Phase I - FY 87-88 $1,382,000 Phase II - FY 88-89 1,382,000 TOTAL $2,764,000 Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. #'k x Q 34 kc tEM#YI?E SE M x x x x x DHE YF x H x #)EDE�Fx)t DF Y9 ( x M-M-tHFMif' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ — $ $ City $ $ $ — $ $ $ Streets-SDC $ $ $ $ -O- $ 86,000 $ 86,000 LID $ $ $ $1 036,500 $1,036,500 $2,073,000 Street-GO Bnd $` $ $ $ 345,500 $$ 259,500 $ 605,000 T O T A L S $ $ $ $1,382,000 $_1,_38_2,_0_Q_0 $2,764,000 #i(•Dt-?FDS-D4•YrDE�#D(i(-DS-K'#-:4#DHiiEi(ii-X-1(-M-I4�?t-#3t#}t�x#-lE#-�f M ifs#DEi4-H-�'D.`-X-1Hf-M-kiHd-M-IfK-DHE#iH• LOCATION: b L. •+mom � �, �—Jl�ltiff � 1� ?l gE� S.Hi� p.�' k �i "wr � snM ��F,� fr: (1+�/]� u ^� h• yL '1' AVE. � .� ,�1 L EXeXoO.. w' ti C ! / i ��, S.Y.•J: �]0 AVE. k \°<y n�a��' �y �� j 'S`O Gq.��\•� AVE. yiel � 9�E(,'•}i-�'(. s.w. za - o c"r'3� ..�' y ep 90M A � VE � • It 3 1 y \ a rdflTA AVE. SN. YE. �_tgf' .,ON_M. �• Va s.M. � SIf( y S PLV D. cT NO. / i 1 i G A f ,33d ^ rM cE. 1 �...� ............. 371 a97rq�j� t 1 /� p TO,AWE.' Da li. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL BLIC WORKS PROJECT: BONITA ROAD RECONDITIONING DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Bonita Road between Hall Blvd. m 72nd Ave. . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved ,to at least minimum City standards for a collector street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, 'storm drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of 50' to collector standards of 60' additional right-of-way from existing 40' - may; be required. Insofar ; as this project entails the provision : for excess capacity usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding. 3E#-M-H-If'd#H-Ate-M-Hifat-SE-x-Dt-M-Yc-xiHCiEx-D(-DE•if-ri-D(-H-�i�f-Df-x-H-M-Kif�H-SHE3f#x-3(-H-H�i#Dt-1(i4-lE-xiC-�#x-TE MiE-xit#H�(#-Dt-DFx H-1iiE3t-x-)(i(iE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 3950' @ $167 per lin.ft. _ $658,000 # $ 329,000 Phase I - FY 87-88 329,000 Phase II - FY :88-89 f TOTAL $ 658,000 Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. it-�-2d-)f3S3t$T-1E' -Mit-H-3E�x-x#x-ft-A�Mit- x-3t-)Ex-)EY.-x-�x-H-x-x-�t-YY(�E#-x-Df-xiFx3HHt-Y-§t SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-8.8 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $_ $ ; $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ CitV $ $ $_ $ - $ $ Streets_--_SDC $ $ $$ $ -0- $ 12,000 $ 12,006 LID $ ___ $ 246,750 $ 246,7 $ 493,500 Street-GO Bnd $ $ $ $ 82,250 $ 70,250 $ 152,500 $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ $ $ _ $ 329,000 $329,000 $_ 658,000 �Ht x31 YT�Y i4 ti3E#�(iE x}fi41E Mit)E x M x K ............--- LOCATION: -xLOCATION a�.,. ,(\ \ v >; a ad.'.. \\ lJAAA LY Yr 1i•C- LK. S C '•' % �' CHERRY Q� F.W. ZI WpL � dV. y SW EODEW000 ST. _ / SFNOSlFO -� Sf 01a LN •IEMMOVNf n i�� 4�, c�N'M1LVfEH ST. ��F �T'� � ' b•r D AROE dei PARK L. ST —I Sr „n _ I... ELJROSE 0 OMY CREEK CT S.W rANNO C �. II omT•" DR ''I SW. 410 MTARNIEWE: LANE „ (� ' W E Rm. TER n - Apvn oWIro S/ Q PEYORDOK- S + Si. E -54 To ¢ 1 - lmc; fa I .L S. 1, 0 n n • i Ct Y I 31UNA 1 + I ORLNONTE Kw O n r 2 '' tm. Ik?3DMIEMI�; S.W. `$ SA'TLE-II T. RO55 ST.!d �{1�dy- ' _ E ii ��A{—/ � ' �, 1 I S.W_ i 11 I� � � CAPITAL IMPROVEMEENTi PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PR03ECT: TIGARD STREET EXTENSION DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS—STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown area, Tigard St. at Main St. :to Ash Ave. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be extended from Main Street to Ash Avenue, storm' drainage improvements provided, railroad track relocated, curbs and sidewalks installed. Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess `capacity usage, the probable funding 'mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture. — 75% LID and 25% Streets SDC funding. x A- # M 1HEit 3E#3(�Q x #)E�EiHt?!K x DHE x#?E#iE ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 750' @ $167 per lin.ft. $ 125,250 AdditionalGrade Fill & Construction 258,650 Relocation of Railroad Tracks 586,700 Right--of—way Acquisition Costs 469,400 $1,440,000 Phase I — FY 87-88 $ 720,000 ' Phase II -'FY 88-89 720,000 TOTAL $1,440,000` Note, figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. -AHHt-H#)i-D(-DE-DFDEDE-DF�•)f-D'eiFT't-H X-tt-Yc-x-DHf-Dt-}(3(iFDHE}F-H-1E�-Y.-D((-�#�DHHE-YEMH-3(-)F•DHE-Hit-D(DE-DHE#H-H•lE-x'x'N' SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL r` Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State City $ $ $ $ $ $ —0— $ 45,000 $ 45,000 Streets—SDC $ LID $_ $ $ $ 540,000 $ 540,000 $1,,080,000 Street-GO Bnd $ $ $ $ 180,000 $ 135,000 $ 315,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ T 0 T A L S $ $ $ $ 720,000 $ 720,000 $1,440,000 iE-Hit-k-H�£•#iEit-HSE-D(if-M-H•�E-Y�E-ic-+ci�H-H3FH3E-H-H-H-DfH-AEIRE-H'vt-DE`14-H-x-H-D(x-DyE-HiEH-H•34-H'R-Dt• 1 LOCATION: t.v[•-'I e..... P 1 _ ,r- 1 P v SW L� 4 /Y LEWIS ` ...$�°. `-I� `iT s.w. m A EL � '^C ♦ E Ii I s n q l el£aDow z cr.4'4`fr�. t a r C U t c \ ST.„ J J d O S. 1 .. •tN# So.ANN ST. Y ,wtLNNT. Sw.1 M J' i yam. s l 4�0 �`nt° 4OI WAY \cJ •. 4 'Bo ro J r" $ j/ 1:A(� Vs.W. yY � 51 —•�O�J `�y.�C P� S Jh iF9Cl�i2 y / `�kl N ti I Q01 4 sl AEy?E M1 H C.... A. ST rO Sw..f0 <Y� r'9 T ;V J 99 � (G�FPM£M wA—S LONNw �J� fifes V� w S.w IER / GR NT Jt. V*,4 "A. '14 Yar S trl�:' •t �\ R1f$ p0. IT. ��'S 41001 GT. 0£Mlt DEL Y � �! O �'� Jti4 / Sw. �Y,RNS ST. (•\` rS O, ST. FARA St � � � �\ ( 'A, _-J '1'J�_ y (�•. pt \IIVVV!!( S� FI01 ST, L f PO P, t'PQ' COON IM t 45 C ,T 7A 'fl.g 1 ♦ a9- T`1't G� OC,r : 4T.^ LM. /s P .s�E t~ OQ.Nj / >' U: { C's 1 ` ' I ca .o- N 01,12111 Y .�Y, 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: BICYCLE PATH SYSTEM - STREETS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City-streets bicycle path system is; designed to be complementary to the 'Greenway bicycle: path/trails system as an alternative transportation network' in the City. The provision of additional sections of bicycle paths to the existing street/bicycle network is determined in conjunction with planned ` street reconditioning and/or street overlay projects. Those' projects identified for major reconstruction include funding provision for incorporation of a bicycle path in planned street work. Those projects identified for interim improvements or asphalt overlays are designed ` to be funded through adoption of a bicycle path levy. - �-St-iE34#:4-2�1E-iE9(-#Yat-iE-:fN-M-�t-K-M-M-K-DH(�-PEDE-H-DEi43t#)E3Eii-K3tiF-MiFDt-M-M-EE#H-X-DE-Mit-°rcciicc'ri-`�lE-k-x-DfiE-M-H-/FM-�#•Mi(-%iQ-M�i?f-)tif3E-tiM { ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: � Phase I - FY 84-85 ' Murdock St. from 98th to 103rd, 1500' @ $15 per lin.ft: $ 22,500 f. Sattler St. from 98th to Hall, 3400' @ $10 per `lin.ft. - 34,000 :Hall.Blvd. from Hwy. 217 to McDonald, 6400'c@ $20 per lin.ft. 128,000 Phase II - FY 85--86 Fonner/115th from Walnut to Gaarde, 3000' @ $15 per lin.ft. 45,000 Walnut St. from 106th to ;121st, 3500' ;@ $12 per lin. ft. 42,000 Phase III FY 88-89 Pacific Hwy. from McDonald to Durham, 6400'' @ $20 per lin.ft. 128,000 TOTAL $399,500 € _. ##�fi-Yc�li(-PEif-HY.-?Sx-tt-Dt-►`•-x-x-#-M-'1€-fF-x�E-�-DFi(-iEi4-li-94iEPE-E4-3£-Hit-Y-x-Xa(iE�-�- i!�E�-DHtaE-xi(-xxic�4-?tiEK-Ei-xi(-�Ex-DFx-)E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY- 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL j Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $_ $ $- $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Bike Levy $ 75,700 $ 87,000 $ $`_ $ 19,200 $ 181,900 *MSD/ODOT $ $ $ $ $ $ _ Grant $ 108,800 $ $ $ $ 108,800 $ 217,600 T 0 T A L S $_1 8 4_,,500 $ 87,000 $ $ $ 128,000 $ 399,500 LOCATION i F a � `�' '*••'d��Ce�Rn((.�.`�=fii�+�.r.�ri1�4�-r•S"�•.+'� '-�j J1�713�'�S'�y � r'�v. H OM ��;; � r .,.�, ��/�;��t4t,�.►�� i,,,sem � �� r. All z,. � �rte"' � • , fi' Qritr� � it?;,• 1A Sl- it{Yi 1 i ,�. 4,1 NPA ESRE�`.' T� '� ..�• +• • � � * - '. � *? GA .5 's. gws2 N•�r11 tfS flrS>: '`�.,+; Q�< t€4 Ct1y�K A✓j�a} •. ✓t .` f+'� _ _ -4�t, .. „+36W�kYi _ �t..+Cj7; �•^7 � p fix= -a,� yyM ,4p ^^��1��'�g`�,•y,`�r'!^ C Y++ yC1 �+ �.'�-�•". I TYF.: "5ri Al ,.,r.'ea .� <s r „'c r.c v-. +.a ;?s:•rF' ss x.. .:,3,.+& tl4,u�si. �'v s?Cat�'4x-.t :x P•ir.. '`s :+ e Ft ,?..�++'s- i,s ).t.-s.'* .y.+�,.., .i`. '.. 'si '; .k, Y'`"n - s S3 �, _x?f.. *:: : n -,• r- .'..,Fir rrs' .b�$'•�. .£ ..,-'.g':`?'' -. ..uY" *_: -5.�i._ a... %� 5, *''i �r. -*�.:.�:- t sit,.^- '� ��+y .�.-.. s�c..x�'�C'� *L,I_�r y'�� +xn..�._�..�+``-i�"ka�.•..frs s2t`�.- .� .��"7'4t '4. xsrii?r,�k,.- T.• ,Vx �,. 'cue.-. .w..�`�' ..�� •c� moi•, _... �.S f`. iy .s. �r.:Cw '�.:""�, ..e.�,:.,•saSy� :..=..;.� �, ..,.�� _�s..�3�?�'�x-, �"�-uY�.. � fi`�>�.,.. �c�'-�-t°N'r.:- x"�.,e'".�,.'?�- t4 s�. ,,,.. , -,._'s-T�$.,_2.'"�,.� �. ... ""s's",. rp�',� .rk '�'c _.s�_ •' -,•ya,#�ck-.'�'��:�iw.r"��5£�_xa:"t 1 €4 -.k- -<v..-.. �' �'r;r ui ,x ,:,,Y a�'�� .��,. ,�;�.',�;,,r__.*y.��. r .� ...:a„^.Y�`,. ys. .,�;.. �:�� !"�.we. H.x"”,-*'v-, zs,.-cam.-:..:''"�'� .,>,-s:s_,.,, ..`7 a_•.t.<r;w' a- -;a s , ga.. �,�•�r„+N -�{r- s.�.�3 _,. �!`ra` ...� ,�Cz {{' � '� y'?,.',�y+`3.e-�5.�•� ��, a3^.r,: .a'a. ..S r, 'Yw:�rx '`�'�_,..,. '�"�1'�`� s�?'°?..y- ,a tom'” �. 1sw' -'2'.t., r,3atk,'Ffiti': 5 5=:3"' -'e l�ae�" '•�. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN T PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT; STREET OVERLAYS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECTLOCATION: City-wide PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Asphalt 'overlays of selected streets. 10 - 12 streets are designated annually for maintenance overlays; averaging 2 - 3 miles of - roadway Per year. Most likely funding sources for these Projects would be the County_Road Levy and State Gas Tax Fund. xx�c�cxxxXXxxX;cXxxXxxxxxxXxxxxXxx-xxxxxxxXxxxxxX �cxXXXxxxxx�ra�xxxXxXxxXXxX ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Asphalt overlays -.$100,000 Per year @ 5 years $500,000 TOTAL_ $500,000 �y #x-x3(-3(-x-x-x##Xi.`#xY-XX-ISIE2H(-}fKx-x#x-D(-x-x-Dtit-x-x-DEi(-x-PF;(x,'i-1f-X-X-XiExiEx-DEDE3i-x-3Ex#X-X-x%?EiFX-x-`hx-X-K-§(#x-X#�fiEH-)t-x-M SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN :., FY 84-65 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State Gas _ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $$ 250,000 . Cnty Rd Levy_ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ 250,000 T 0 T A L S $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $.100,000 $ 100 000 $ 500,Q00 ?tai Yfi4 X�3E f X?E#A`X X 3H£ii xif#x_X_X x-X**"X*x-'rE-X X X-X*X X X3l?(x:4iHi-X-X X-X-X*X H•-X-K-K x-X W"I X XAA X-x-x x=rf-3t-I -K-X-* t. LOCATION: 11 11 3i i CAPITAL IMPROVrME6vT PROGRAM'! PLAN ' PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) (LID) PROJECT LOCATION: City--wide intly Local street/storm drainage 'improvements funded PROJECT DESCRIPTION: according °olicy i by the City and affected property owr.rs, an n LID cost-sharing e g p e 'Fund. (15%' City;85% local property owners) a •provided for n an ' estimated share of This Fund is based on the City's projected annual costs, available for matching, if and when LID projects are completed. 3(-xiE34�i'h#-x-x-x-DEx")Ex3Ex-i(x#i(-x-3E-YE-x-x-x-x-lET(-x-SE##x lE#'x-:(x M-x-x-x-x#x#x-x-�k-)E#-t(�'rx-x#x x-1Ei(-x-x-iEx-x-Mci(-x-)Ex-i£-x-x-x#x# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4,250,000 85% Local Improvement District -° $850,000 per yr. 5 years $ 750,000 15%" City;Share -State Gas Tax $150,000 per yr. @ y- TOTAL $5,000,000 x-i(?d-'�-x'�i-x-x-x-?Qc-3E#3Q•x�4-x-x'k3t�-Fi4��-x-xi(-x'�Ex-x-x#3d-x-x-x#9f x�t�(it-x-x�t-x�t-#-M-it'+Exit-x-x-x M-x3t-rf-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x x-xx•x x-x-lE SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 8�? FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL $ $ $ $ Federal $_.- 1 0 $ 15 0 $ 1 a $ 150 000 $_ 75 ooQ o State Gas Tax $ 150.6-0-0_$_______- $-_ $ $ $ City $_------ LID $ 85Q $000 $ 85 0 $ 850,000 $$ 8 0 $ 850,000 $$4 2 0 $ __ --- $1 TOT A E. S $1 QOO 000 $1 OQO,000 ,000 $1 ,000 $1 000,000 2000,000 $5,000,000 #�-#-�#-x-?Ex•X M-x-�i-DI-DFx�'i'�E-x-'+E#�:-��-x-ii-x-It x-x-x�-x-ic-'h 1EiFx x..x-x_iEx�(-x-x itit-1HEx-xx3c-x-x-tEx-x-x-x#�t-xiE#-1t-lEicxi(-x'kj(=x-x-if x-)t# LOCATION: t`£ Milo CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: HALL BLVD. RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) _ PROJECT LOCATION: Hall Blvd. between Durham Road & Hwy. 217 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for an arterial street, Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, ; bicycle path, '''traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of additional right-of-way to uniform arterial standard of 80' - 100' may be required. Existing right-of-way varies between 40' -; 85' . Insofar as this ityusage, the probable funding project entails' the provision for excess capac ` - mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 67% LID and 33% Streets - SDC funding. )(-)(-1i ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 11,056' @ $250 per lin.ft. _ $2,764,000 $1,382,000 Phase I - FY 87-88 1,382,000 Phase II - FY 88-89 TOTAL $2,764,000 Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. #M�Df# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY"SS-89 TOTAL Federal $_ $ $' $ $ $ I State $ _ $ _ $ $ $ $ City $ $ _ $ $ Streets-SDC $! $ _ $_ $ -O- $ 86,000 $ 86,000 LID $ $ $ $1,036,500 $1,036,500 $2 073,000 Street-GO Bnd $ $ $__ $ 345,500 $ 259,500 $ 605,000 T O T A L S $ $ $ $1,382,000 $1,382,000 $2,764,000 #x x# x 1HE i4 x M x�(3(ita(#x x iE M#x�(x#i()hx Dt x x k#DFb(#�(x x x H tEa4?E x x H x 1(x xi(aHE#M(F�43(x-K-K kE3H(i(1FoE �+ �LOCATION: �� .� i '"' :'.' Y`Y, s, s• .r' S'. ��s r G/ �f �/ :;,� Py'"a_ ��--- IJ LV.9619 AYE ,e9 E [� t` dC Ti i Jd SW. 9C=e. lis 94 CT .�� C a�� lJ F F g i f 9� Y c O� �k �t� �Sj'it� 9YE •�w.._ D f*'p� •4 ,,/� Sd. 91a1 LVE. e �7Y~�{( '.w. tnd �' _ o� E 1 c,"4�, '`•, L 1 � + I.YE.� 91r1�1 >: �� ✓ � (1� GJ R dry $�f 9W. 401P LYE'T. 1� I ry-,T�..' rr r ($t�H�sro. �� ' .37 r' �' R ^ �c�lr• >vc. o I Se4E N ♦ L U3:T 1. S.M. 3 I WE • i r, ._ � Aid ._._.-._� n S.v, TTA LY� � •• � � � � S.v TA,9 ,oYT, 1 / CAPITAL IMPROVEMEENiT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: BONITA ROAD RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKSDIVISION: OPERATIONS—STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Bonita Road between Hall Blvd. & 72nd 'Ave. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for a collector street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm and d of drainage, . bicycle path, traffic signs delineators. Acquisition additional right—of-way from existandards of 600'' sting 40' —"50' to collector , may be required. Insofar, as this project ,entails the provision 'for excess capacity "usage, the probable funding mechanism ' would be a joint city/LID venture — 75% LID and 25% Streets— SDC funding. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 3950' '@ $167 per :lin.ft. _ $658,000 # $ 329,000 Phase I - FY 87-88 329;000 Phase II FY '88-89 TOTAL $ 658,000 Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY-87-88 FY 88-89_. TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ Cita $ $ $ $ — $ -0- $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Streets—SDC $ $ LID $ $ $ $ 2461750 $, 246,750 $ 493,500 Street-GO Bnd $ $ $ $^ 82,250 $ 70,250 $ 152,500 $ $ $ $ $ TOT A L S $ $ $ $ 329,000 $ 329,000 $ 658,000 #iFX�(-X-X-X-XiHHH!i(-�i-XaHQ-iHt-x-X-x-X-X-D4-Xii-X-X-Xic-X-x-X-X-x-x-X-X#�(i�rTE�t-X-X-x'4-x-X-X-X-►t-Xi(at-x-x-X X-XX-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-x-X-X#-x X�EX-lE LOCATION:. . 1 r1/ �o oP w%.. V 5�'� eLaa♦ \ sW i • 1 uy� 7 EV% � •/ CKNNY Y. t.w. st,� .;" sw cucew000 sT. j / �i snNOBwB w L_I ICT FPNM'NEp 'R S W. , P ..i - -' ••_ NM1LYiEW`ti. rNLw Ou.J/ DEN 1 / L" lJ S.. w � NLLr1Ea CT. VPRK VL" 0,`` ELROSE .0 My CHEEK CT. '��/_ •.. u t CT __f• a Ea NNO ERffN 09 }. I i S w. MOUNTaRrvICw Tl ( L i 1 i • 4>r :•Y w �Lpivi•u.t, T` zRasE LP ` l� BQNIT rI ROAD a TEN aCF a Sw INEE STfi— �N(,1: 1 c• INCZ `( N. aEnWs1WN "' ol,IT f i !TR Y N. ^ wtw M iNEER n t o +C'''OF T`y OR wsl •;; / 04 Rw �- i• Ste. NCOOt•P!w / , ROtt Sl. ;I 3\ �� ' N t SAME 4•,1 •' tw zae F f -^C 4!7 — I v �\ATE � ca4 •r {nn{yy� I ! �I � :�'I-..... _ R4BLE �T. �.. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: TIGARD STREET EXTENSION DEPARTMENT: "PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: 'OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown area, Tigard St. at Main St. to Ash Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street :to be extended from Main Street to Ash Avenue, storm drainage improvements provided, railroad track relocated, curbs and sidewalks installed. Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess capacity usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/CID venture — 75% LID and 25% Streets — SDC funding. X DEH##-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-"-X-DEX#XiF X X#X X K X X Xi()E X i(X X X IE X if-X X X 1f X X ii X##X#1(!<iEit X X X Xj4 X X X X X R 1(X X Xi(if THE X#X?f# ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 750' @ $167 per lin.ft. $ 125,250 Additional Grade Fill &'Construction 258,650 Relocation of Railroad Tracks 586,700 Right—of-way Acquisition Costs 469,400 $1,440,000 # Phase I — FY 87-88 $ 720,000 Phase II — FY '88-89 720,000 TOTAL $1,440,000 ' Note, figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. XHK X H##XXX#X-H-X-XX�EtENH#DEXXa(XKXDE#(iE#Hjt (XIEXHHDaXXXXDi�(XH#XX##X#HH}FX#HX(iEHXfiEXXSEXHiEXMXX SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL' Federal' $ $ $ $ $ $ State $ $ $ $ $ $ City $ $ $ $ $— $ Streets-SDC $ $ $ $_ —0— $ 45,000 $ 45,000 LI® $ $ $_ $ 540,000 $ 540,000 $11080,00= 220 Street—GO Bnd $ $ $ $ 180,000 $ 135,000 $ 315,000 T O T A L S $ $ $ $_720,000 $ 720,000 $1,440,000 YcX'd�t##?(#X#X i4#X-XiEi:-DEX-X-DEX•X-X-X-X-XiEiH('•4i(-X#itX#XiFX-X-H-H-Hif-XiE#-bEX�X-X-X#iEXiEXfit-XifX-X##Xa:X iE-D£-DE-DF7f-X-X-X-X# LOCATION: _ y,.• P f E.i ; 5. VA" ST t`Eia PL [�B s `- I 1 r°r cam• /`1 RRfpE rSi�� y 54 .C" 'n t�4� F \\\\` !.. � � '"V��.� - _ ._ .-... .�, a(Jcr ,`° ER JF• sy. ,ter � _-. 61T C" SY.i1M1 ST. 4 •t..>• S A4�y t tr v 4A�. Su. .ItF4 „ I �(�) �. tp( oW °r-• `S! � h t, 4� Fv tral%, M f b__-1 ,_e71 s unoT._.sl' s•< ,s °%.�:r�' " °tf,.. �. r 4 �LC,RN'a M�f `C voawRR. �tWA.Tom. ibQ yq° awtA RO ST. / �• GS pen GEL Y (\/�\f\r f A.t I' .p � ..' �/. W s° .. t\d` O (•t, YI iT.. `�r � . �p A �:.� irl.: i+ f � ST R 8, in °O�d�d�• �/' is. OY>R♦ f1t CAPITAL ItiPROVEMEUT PROGRAM PLAN PR07ECT DETAIL l PROJECT: McDQNAI_D ST. RECONDITIONINGD DIVISION: OPERATIONSRTMENT: PUBLIC -RKS STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: McDonald St. between 99W & Hall 'Blvd. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street to be simproved with the addition of curbs, sidewalks, and storm drains. Acquisition of additional right-of-way, from existing 40' - 45' to collector standard of 60" will be required if full development of ,street deemed necessary. Insofar as this project entails the provision for excess capacity usage, ,the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding'. DEjHt-)Exx-x-x-)Fx-x#x-x#x-x-x#x-x-'�#x�tx-x�f-x-x-xx�Ex#x-x#x-x##xlEx-x-x-x�E#3E-x)t-xx-x-x-xi(-xx-�-x-x-x#x-x�Ex-x#x-x-xic-x#x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 5500' @ $167 per lin.ft. $ 920,000 x $ 460,000 Phase I - FY 88-89 (460,000) (Phase IL - FY 89-90)' TOTAL $ 920,000 Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. �E�t 14#-x-x-3HE-x X-x-xi4�E#x-x-xit-x-x-x Y xFx-b(-x#x-x-x#iE)t�-x-x-x-x-x-):-x Y#�4#x-x-?,-x-?FSE-jE M-x-x-x�(-x#x-x-1t#x-x-x-x#x-x-x-x-x#�-x•x-x-x# SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87 FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL Federal $ $ $___ $_ $_ $ State City $ $_ $_ $ $ $ $ $ __ $ $_ 30,000 $ 30,000 Streets-SGC LID $ $ $ $ $ 345,000 $_ 345,000 Street-GO Bnd $ $ _ $ $ — $ 85,000 $ 85,000 T 0 T R L S_ $ $ $ $ $ 460,000 $ 460,000 OSx###D:Hxxxtxxxxxxx#xxxiEx'(x#xxx#xx-x-xxxx)EKxxx#xiExkiElHfxxxxxxxxxxx#x)Exxxifx3E)cxxaExxYEx OGATIQN: t `J zW. R zT7 / CXERRY P i zw. L / � E-EWOOD ST. T n�I SANORtWO .Y YY / I zT. l NJ YEwbO S .GARDENS %_RSLKid ST. CT. `Y AROE L& � PWit FI. 4. .S 4 N MC OONeLD / zT L ,2 �•4_ %\ 1 \. �yp�p �E it k r! _ _/ ONY CREEK CT CT. z.W Eq,y C a Sw. MOUHTAMviEW � Y w R --ii"-L iuisirl PPCEz LP %\ L� ROAD ♦ __ 1 ^,^ Ar EW rER E I ~ -- -- et L � .AC i SW 1 CC I J PY S.W. C 10 PEtlaROOK L1�J � sT E ST , ;ECt �f DR �PESIJN4 T. 1 LL Lb ORTE + O4RrE' a c. _ TL ER I i OR. 1 I - Aw. XOO9YKw e_N p �j r UF a Ml�t^�E s' zW. KAs[ ST /= � ) W n i I '� ��S. F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: 'GAARDE ST. RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS _DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Gaarde Street between 115th Ave. and 121st Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards fora collector street. Improvements will include curbs : sidewalks, storm' drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of additional right-of-way, from existing 40' - 45' to collector standard of 60' may be required. Insofar as this project' entails the provision for excess capacity usage, the probable funding mechanism would be a joint City/LID venture - 75% LID and 25% Streets - SDC funding. #kHxMxx�tYtDfxxx3EM1E)EHxitiQM2E'lcxxxx#Dixxxat)ExxxDE#x#x#'kx?fxMxMxMDFtc #DE#i(#YCMx3HH(?tDEx#(MJHF'xM' ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 18001. @ $167 per'lin.ft. $ 300,000 # Phase I FY 98-89 $ 150,000 (Phase II' - FY 89-90) (150,000) TOTAL $ "300,000 Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights Or Traffic Signals. �-if-Dc-ll-DE-H-x-x 3E-34-x-x3Hr->4##�'tit-)?'3t-x-�-;f-x��E-x-Dt-x�f�S-�-�-�-DFxiE-x-x-Dt-3Ht-DE'H�4aE-x�F-x-x-x•'�-x-iti(3(-M-##x�(3S-3E SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89_ TOTAL Federal $ $ $ $ $ — $ State $ $ $ ' $ $ - $ City $ $ $ $ $ $ Streets-SDC $ $. $ $ $ 9,000 $ 9,000 _ LID - $ $ $ - $ $ 112,500 $ 112,500 Street-GO Bnd $ $ $ $ $_ 28,500 $ 28,500 1 T 0 T L S $ $_ $ $_ $-1 $ 150,000 t#t(?t-M-M-R-x-x-k YDE-x-M-At-x-Af-�-x-?4-?i-M-It'iE#4E X-x-)4.3(-H-2E-x-)F#•X-N#x-x-x-R-M-M-tt-x-x-M x3f-�'!f-�EK iE'�Ht-x-x34•x-k-k-DFx•3f-)i-k-9f-x-Al-x-x•�t-It,If-DFit LOCATION: '' W. 9T.W T y P SANN ST. `Y GWS �. ~ Sx ST NANf1J Sn�Sa R w s r sa�r �g `a" $Y. � `��W('s�� na+•+'�' 1b `�,a' Qp+t>�h. tr-n '�+r�e,/... cERy ;MT STkUY �7i �� EO��.NER''� N fir. a� 1' 99 W yW. ;9.W. WAht4i9 „. kLM.TA T. fo—c. Sy,: GRANT vI/ ST. �, (iA jdGE• PEG 6Et, z p� - 4. SW YA!ON sj. ♦ 5 - /pfd s--- o ,k 3; Y inWWtviN Wt � s9r.a°a. !Y w n+wr AWPE y 'sw. cy. .. sW t CAPITAL IMPROVEMN'T PROGRAM PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT.: 121ST AVENUE RECONDITIONING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: OPERATIONS-STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: 121st Avenue-betweensWalnut St. & Gaarde St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: - Street to be improved to at least minimum City standards for a collector street. Improvements will include curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, bicycle path, traffic signs and delineators. Acquisition of additional right-of-way, from existing 40' - 45' to collector standard of 60' may be required_ Insofar as this project ' entails the provision for excess capacity usage, the '`probable funding' mechanism would % be a joint City/LID venture -'75% LID and 25% Streets SDC funding. #it•-X-X-K-X-Xx X-X#-X#X-x-X x#x-x-)f-tf-x-X-X-X X-X-X-X-X-x-X#XX-X X-X-x-X�(-x'X 3(-X-x-X-x-x-X-X-X#-X-)t-X-X-x-X-X-X-H-X-x-x X-DE-X-X-x-x-X-X-x-x-x-X-x ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: 4200' '@ $167 per lin.ft. $ 700,000 Phase I FY 88-89 $ 350,000 (Phase II FY 89-90) (350,000) TOTAL $ 700,000 a Note, Figures Do NOT Include Street Lights; Or Traffic Signals. SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN " FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY 86-87_ FY 87-88 FY 88-89 TOTAL _ Federal $ $ $__ $_ $— $ State $ #. City $ $ $ $ _ $ $ f Streets-SDC $ $ $ _ $ $ 22,OGa $ 22,000 s LID $ $ $ $ $ 262,500 $ 262,500 `. Street-GO Bnd $ $_ _ $_ $_ $ 65,500 $ 65,500 i -T 0 T A L S $ $ $_ _ $ $ 350,000 $ 350,000 i ##•x-3!-x#X#xi4-rt-X-Ti-TEiHE-x-x-x�t•X-xiQ-X-X#.it-x X•x-X-X#X-Df-X##-x-x-X-xiH4-X#is X-X-X�-x�-X�#X-Xi(-X-#iFx-X-H-x-X-x-x#2EX-X-X-X�EiS#X-x#x. LOCATION: sT.N ti .nac cT r'A f �. b r SW. ANN ST.' S ,M4�NNT c CT • ; ` R /pJ£ 6w.—.ENROL—.ST.41. Fea 3 K ej/ NUT tv i Sw. fONN>:N s 46. E S4NMEM ST. <Y'' ' �5 w. \ SW. ALBERT4 ST. I.NNENi. 9 /- W !R/ 5 ( �°FGR^ t: Fr G Cft. K 3 Z Or -p i.W. FANA ; ST. i SR. MARION ST. �'EbJK C9 P !°' N I ST. 3 F C MSt /• �'� S.W. /A4��4 f4AlYWEN S W E -w. Pppf m LS M ..NILLY W S 2 LN 7 Sw. °cwsrRr 0 APpE / P4flK PL.. 5 v. R L 4 _ r 9 s W s CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLAN! PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT: OFF—STREET PARKING DEPARTMENT : PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION:_ OPERATIONS—STREETS (213) PROJECT LOCATION: Downtown area, south of Main Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Off—street parking to be provided in downtown area to improve traffic flow and ,enhance attractiveness of area. Insofar as; this project entails the provision for excess capacity,'usage, the ;probable funding mechanism would be ajoint City/LID venture 67'Y L-I0 and 33% Streets SDG fund i rig. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COST: Provision of off--street parking Phase I FY 88-89 $ 630,000 (Phase II FY 89-90) (630,000) TOTAL $1,260,000 XirX_X*X Y,X-X X-X-+X-X-Yl'X#X-X-K-X-X X#X#-"-X-X-X#-Y'* X'X* )E#-X-X-K X Y,#X X X'X X#X XX X X X#X X X X X X X ii`X X X X jt K X X X X K SCHEDULE AND FUNDING PLAN - FY 84-85 FY 85-86 FY £36-87_ FY 87--88 FY 88-89 _TOTAL Federal — State $— City --- Streets—SDC $ _$_ $ $_ $ 46,000 $_46 000 LID $ $ $ _ $ $ 422 loo $ 422, 100 Street—GO Bnd $, _ $ $ $— _ $�161,900 $_ 161,900 TOT A L 5 $ $ $ $_ $_63o000 $ 630,000 X-Ycit-DE-K?S-x 3E#'.f-XiFX-X-K-K-34#-X`X-K-K-X-K•#-H�-x-K#-D(#�(-K-K-X-X?i-K#`K-K�(##-K'#�(`K#-X#-K-K-K-IEX-K-K'#-X-K-K-K-3t-Xi(iE-K H-K-X-x-X vK# LOCATION I ;I SW L� 0"V LL ST. YEAl10WT \ PL. OAME ll 1.:ST.N /^, S O CCS S.br �CRLpG a.�M zv. nrl zT. b -4 zw1 r f r N fr sw R i y N rr.v /. All, �� LSW rv>Eb1tnL —SiJP`RCyLt 4� IF c d F fOnHE `wxr s n TannER w % /Ca41W C1. OEARY CEL i Q � Cq' o-y`4 Sb, VRML ST. [ 4 e CM S LY91 C• � � y 9f, �r L� C ` 1 � i � i1R ST. `. T [ pp �� (� .. �/ .{.P� Tw�•'4 C C,�_ ST d—Pe � I ti Yy 2' S� Cf-• lm f �(i ST. 3 t fj � YN'f'� � Vb NJ� � SW. 04RS — Sw. 'F yAa ✓• ,' '[ �--. � .r � � � CNERAY Fy'� 3 a a t., 6 ,j �A t VIII. kC9<WULED ENTS ` A special thanks is extended to the following persons who have been especially helpful in the preparation of the C.I.R. Frank Currin, for the time and guidance provided. Loreen Wilson, for help in the procedure and processing Of'C.I.P- Bob Thompson, for putting up with endless questions. patt Martin, for help in the processing of this document. Bob Landis, for putting up with endless questions. Donna Corbet, for general support and encouragement. IX. REFERENCES o Environmental Design and open Space Plan City of Tigard August, 1977 o Master Drainage Plan -- City of Tigard CI42M-"i 11 July, 1981 o Metzger-Progress Community Plan Washington County Community Planning Program March`, 1980° o Regional Bicycle_Plan Metropolitan Service District August, 1983 o Tigard Comprehensive Plan - Vol. 2 City of Tigard March, 1983 i� To: City Council Date: 11/10/83 From: City Recorder , Re: Agenda Items'> 7.2 Five Year Plan Report 7.3 Tam Base/G.O. Bond Discussion The above;agenda items will be presented at the meeting. No action to adopt will be requested. These documents are for planning purposes at this time. x a t v TF '�."s .'I `•° N mg EW MIA e i C' r ?rei w rr v ."�.�. it;x ay.s,�, :kwc ;' �,trz „ttxv�rtis,F2,, c�ts 'x'- ":^?�s w� .5.. 4 ssn s`i�,r' d�5�,,.sti' 2,-•e*�F .` ' titr z+, ,L? r.1w�+ §� ` t L B 8 N In p 8 O V 2Oi O v h N m Jf 1 b JfOb N � m b P p� I^ p w N b b b b o N ply $ � 1 U F o N^ Cn O H U q v W 6 r n ml niN O N W fQA H I v a N 8 O O r S w C.9 O O ^ 66 F ��iv bnemw m m F{ f bI ., v mmN v G M n 1 ti N N D F� �2Nu Hw k HNw W Yui. q 'ate rr 1.. G O h In 0O w bm h � m mrn rnooO .omrnn � agO ti bb cM�t 1000 b i0 m OI C {m{ C .a mn0 m mb N .-�PG yM rn LJ nN.Lh M N h... ,C.Q N N N M M M O m rn C N N rnN I,f Ou7O O OO$ m m p OrnOmO .-+000�nOM O - e.00no �rhn ^$a��a+, P rn w v'121" m rnN�o Mn+o r. N N M^d A �O 9 b Lo M N _ Iri 0. p .�'D A R1 in h A O �_O pp O P P 4 w m rn.ON N M oo olJ 0 mb itl0 on+m m 000 N O Lo lo O MmO �?m to Lf).y O N N rn P h 1[1 y h h n In N�:b 4 .M.h M.m n C M-� h C N N N b 7 w7.� b�J' N P N.�.M N M�Ci .-�h C.M N N M C. C o M a M+n ooN O O ooO h+n o uf00u'i�0 00 00 C*, N ^+ 0 M�O h Ln h.O O rn n tf1 N n rn N O O O ti W O F tp C �11nN h..In V NNul M m MOOM �O O 'A O C C t Q.y P C�L! �O n C Q�.-� m)�O O 1,.+ U m C O � Mo M N +C•.m h Nl.o: M CII M m M G y 0.0000 _OOoC P PChb P OMOOPlnmo0000OI[C'10 2 n O_ j O CC M to o mM �C N n M;g O N 1. oN 0 m b Om b NmN N M'M N O b � M M a r 4 � s m m d Lu N Rz M ?. > C ? w d a D, m m OU d C7 H TN m L Z Y4� Y 7 0 Hcn cm m •U C O L O. L 7 d r LL S Z?LL LL m C O. E O O i C U C J N LL F- }V 41 O J an d Y Y L 5 d d 0. w >O I H Z d fTY C CJ•n0.U � ¢ w LL ¢ WO y x O W X W W y O V)X W x¢ C d d d 'o a W w 6 F F- J I-0 w H. J. O F d J 3 a O T W d Z W 7 Z y a W LL (fJ to J O C T L 7 VJ +D LL d . d d V' W O H U) S G V a, ¢ �' �`Oy T m O GA N d I. J 0Kt72 J SFO J LD-J U0: 9 J 6 LLO 1•-¢ y y F ¢OF ¢ .C. d E 1d+C d d Lu a S_ o J 5 B1 O C M m U C d fb L t1 ��Q d"y H O ¢ w d L lY O•�• S wCZF H Z O:=I F V OF- U co0.LL(DU JLL0 ULLZ o: F G m 300¢m 06¢ 0 a 00 O wrar o Q LL y y y V y y U 0.y y m y F N O O N O o O O C mIcq M) m N I N M OM b NdPrn11a00 f? 'n rnw �� ®. G+ �rnMbM 7100h b N ti M Q +O.-1 P rn P ¢ N N v ad M rnb Mrn Pm14 A�-�O n'b h t!7 O +O h('• t0 ad .h+ N N h b m C m(7 N Lei1 % h 2MphO^`O�'p MPM�N w P h0 mhM toCm P m m O N o O CM C<m h m at O b P b C C In N N ¢m N h M W M 6t!? C b y M N ti A my M N O +Y C N h(t m mlh m cq `� J .-r N h rn h M+'� O an'O N b�O h h b lO0 y b H N C P +O 0111 P+n c.h C;h Nb C m '+P bC O.rM M N�a� 4001T P N PC m hN 11 Mm m NN mMSD O M*'�< Q. � N b M �-1 N ul fP'1 C�H N 10 wN P P b M M In +-1 Lil N N .r hPON r, 14 'o NbN •o h M rnm m t0 m �P N �M h iL1 hm b u') .-�P N C!In ."�t,,. O P•n q N C M b OM qI K N m o Ln M m H AL1 +O N M M C m N o` 1n m In to C.C C O M O O 0hIn wLo bw NN N V�'1 N ti.+b �w HM N � N en ~ P bo n m o O 0 ' Q :, Mar Np W m rn I pf pI In n m p pI pI pI ti� �. 1 I0 �Mr^0:y p rn�C p p p OI O O 3 W� CIj ®.�O ¢ 11 � rn NIOO InOon I � I1N�� { _YUW9�. l . m C..GN m O n rn m t mm0 OO m�''mp m 111 O.O 0 0 1 w m -o- 1d� ?a La i �.� q I t m r' w w�O pI p1 pI ac��O. Um � rnmNln 1 7 1 I m r1+7in O a rnn0 OOn eq :N W O O Q O pI 0$� b b a 11 pI I N i LL� � ��. O Ov I 1 OD- mnCN 1 �:.1 :OI mOl "•� r U ¢ _W a _..,.m O 7 a O r v L 1 LL Y U•.n H N.. m. Z it m 0u _a'� 2 m H✓ C C .+ 01.0+ G C 1 b H d tC L H C Cfl X L H % T rd C L 2 W N # N y3.1 C.•+ N W C Y ti H eHi h x d H y d"d j O U T T a W W 7 0 W O~ O ZU*M t t- W X d•.a ✓� 7 d d d fE y U 3 T W p Cc 01 d V 2hJd H jJy2 ¢y}- d O L L 0++. m1m2J O _ N H LL L1 a CA -c•G m N J 6 f•• y H L tC Y Y 0 X W L O co-on 3 3 o d d d d H C @ Cc L d.d 0U•.+ L (4 ' rd 3y d» O E -N taJ K rd m W L x L J F m a F-. T D' 0 2 2 0 O F-1+ y �• J a Q_ 3 16 0 j C7 J i!1 2 U 6 CA U1 m w r6 o c U u Od OO OO o1 op n lt1 0 tJ 0 lI O1 0 I I I b a d. rn cb©�¢ 1 0� � csn0upn b1 I O1 � � a, a m 0 N r ¢ M 1x11 N 4 e a d C14O V O m d Y 10 o ♦ r•1 OII to NCV1 C�I to pl pti In -V ¢m w aNOh ' MmQ rnOc�.l im• I lnm rd Hy rs Mm - mc1 1 n1oOC ^+ q �N n m m aK f 2 m 1[1 j3 ro% N 01 - ra l� y - N cl M rt 111 Q�O 14 M b b l R> ^�A- W 11;7-4t rt N J, p•Nmt N O i Q O y C U°° Nm Nmlam•Ol C�� lc'/aalfl COOI n I I N pm `y b.•1 �O m Mm w M N N y 41 fT t11M Nldl M bC m^t "Ln' G1 r0'1O a�H n1 m m m ip a0 W YS n m O 1 a.M1 Q�` L y M m C 111 m M•m T 6! - N p mlt/ nnh � 1 an C.a�s'iN N v,r6 } m N of N n 00 tl W ^'.g O�OOi01t rn O I �Ov N�oNPp�n � p O P O D �? a P � �. m M Q m V� P0 m..N m N .ill 0. a p , .r, 0000 O O 000 P10 .r N:t(f0 W.m r) <q O N.P O.m N N I IO OLn n In M b N IlI O IO O ` V.m If10��D M.� P. m G OI N.�N ti .g+<ISl .em _ -W ' O m 0. p wmm c.00 tlIll 0 0. 0 O In S In '+ N N un rn O W P.m O P O ^'� m O p1 In N rtl O m N V O+b U m In m In MQ n P m i N N a O w 1 m m N.N-1 m m N,.... a i 0 0 O. O ,O p 1pn m In�A tl n 0 O O O OIOfI P OIn ��OOji m m.-aP m O P II t[I N O M.•+ m tlf lli 'C N O N N O P r. 1 "<y N N •t v.-IM m N V W LL't m Q M: P P .a P n.,� Ql Ln P N Iti m N ' a o a 00 tlO 0 O8S 9m0 +00 N� O�0 010 N o I OU N P Q m Ill Om In N V m 0 M 4n P M M C �j�j M P 1 N N In m.ri M .H h.� NIn PNN N U 0 m W ti a .o Y 1 d d O * i :vLL &- u)N •'� } 'M C fA v R: �'• Yn d d d.. M F F Y to L W O. 0 r-I SIC d W O o_ L ~ d W M o to S ^t O tl ¢Y.y+ C m Y I N `NL a ><'O ++ 70 W ¢ U r T7 - d O m 'a r� c Ld W O J OF f6 i V W D: J9 U i F �v .0 N I 1 ¢ m C C d v• OLL 2z 0. uai to Y :4 Ol la. r fA T T N d ••� C £ I rS i fC i N Y Y W e E i G. - LL w•--.ppa-C CN G x 2 d.AUL J F 7 7 ~ b•^' Y � w O V n C L V W C W 0 0 w 7M 3 LO a 7 03 Y 2Z C C7£ O 7 V V V ¢NtJ�N¢0 co mo m¢p z w x LL v F Q J V' O V C 6 d Y 8 Amo8 or8o8 �oSo04 o bo c P N ti <m O m N W N h N ¢m� •E N rl Q m m V tp Pm O T N N ?N <T Qf 6 OI O LD h m m P P Sm bm h�mlOm W M Omd•m lfl 010001 I o m N w In al• M P O m O V N N P o m N T ¢m � d J mP v0o 0+ 01 � 'o 4 m m r<+Il1 O N O I!1 O aT J iZ N M Ili Q F I" n: a Ol Itl In Q en b m er m Ol NV_ q m tO m eF N SSS m w N 4 O.M b B' P o N Q��. iT .q bn w N ~ N P Il:N N N dTj Q V 0, 4.-I O a N P b 0 N N co� fmsl P .P•I In P E ff v1 P ICl N to ti N.��P m PP+N ~ tl 00 O o LUa Q.p c � o�� I M �°; I 1 Wm om `� � Q C YS O W hQ 'O OO� i 0 0 m m O I n ^^^�sIrl ` \ 0 N a: M- M O M e ,., , N Lc)n < M M U co i d OI M I1 Nn U m N O N 7 In W 0c m 0 00 Ln p , 0 e W OO O 00 �N 016. CO0 aa) N OOo M n o o a n a p a GC SA G p u) ¢a �, N z y.{ O 2� Y L G C7 &J w LL a(s�AvU ¢ ° �? w m tl s ow Z HaUiY Z rA Y d [C !JJ V.- tl C o�..+ m cn Ipi W OC'. �,.J O. R 9J N > Q L W a� i6. dU y .0 O J y v 17 wrX N m dJ�c tlW a Q z yaJ E-fl W C J W L3C CU W ,..� V L W m UL7 0 N + 6 p 2' a i6 - wuj O m N 7 rd a rJ L cn !6 Q W C7 J 'm L O I J L V J GOON v.O yC.l -pp .• [x. 3 „�S. J J' J O LL =0 LL 2 o U U 6 h- f6 m i- w m U W O O m L M Q1 m N N M m ect•J O Q ut 0� vii uQi �� O,.I, N N toco U SIY ti M va.1 oD N Q m ro Ln 'C In N Q m I N N H rnI m 00", rn O O O QI O of m tt1IM ! N h Ln�1f C C O O I h 1 M N 1mp N cct r c0 O m � a O O O 000O O O N O u7 w o 0 0 0 o 0 o o r o n F-m ui d'NOe r OOOQQtt O ppl x Ln N NM bb�11M I � . OIN 10 'Nm 0 m m m 0. M C ~N M `L d p u1 oOOLn -00 O 0 0Ln W n S O0 0 h 0 0 O O n O n Fn I v Mc n p1 ¢` I O.G OpI C p1 wmI I C tominN 1 ... OI 001 N I h Nrn 6 p 0 0 0 0 u 0,0 0 O O O O w O r n 0 0 N 0 0 0 O O 0 0 rNOm pI M 1000 I O pI in u�C puj.+i1 2 -cin .-. I W of OO OOI 6 I v Nn W .+W .n h n n a 0 2� W 4 mm CN0N o0�O oNO� n.0O00�o0.-�0h 0 0e<nV 0 no Oo o0o Io 0OO Oc ut ppa 0 V O 0H h cM W a O a. G 6 N d rri E " p » v h y a mI M z H » L u- s a ¢ » v rd u.. w T a V 6 a T t 0 L aw \4- U L aCJ 0 Ld LQ w H C T O O a U y ¢ a F- � t- O. ..� O +� L o M•.i C Z O12 H O > rj•.� 3 o > a C F+ 2 Q a) L s-!N v N 0 O L L E 1Cti O x L C > O< a U 6 m 7 LL O. a d O K li M m 0 W L7 O rJ r4 J c L- \w O J P F- m N a >+ C X C O W a T X a > W u a L c U O C m e 0 u a L a¢'.£ ¢ v 9 a F- P c c o o w ¢ c c o >a F e s c z f6 o 4_G a y a 2 r5o 4_ a=; O o 2 16 » L...� a t C (!i ¢ f6 »»! . 4 �6 Y NI k m O .3 L O. fb > ii m Q L y a i Y t7 J O .J J a C a m w(n U �6 £ C a fS 'n t¢ 7 0 V c ®! w o » r F a o ».cTN8 r¢-= w w o cJ o o woc� v,00 o L,L) o� N m N m U m (p !n fn m O Oo 0 M M O O O M N O of" P �n o O S O O i n m o o mo O M W.r N O 000 O i N .+00 1 O W 0+0 O a 'r_ F-m CJ p I Q o O b O+ ! d N Ln O 1 �fl N r X17 M h O m N b N ¢ u1 m C O• b N m O M C C > c t Q .•� O b N N �n .C4 ? N W W.ef a ' e! 4.'N rn M OOh O O1 ,n OI I �n mr Nh. d tUT m M N Q� � 0.t m t0 m O Ln en a O uT a O O O to b m t N N �O N 1 I F 1 1 I oo M- 2' v w moos 1 l 0 rnoom Yq�� g0o0 h. 0 LU Col N N M N N O m a r 0.0 W n n.O .pn I 1 I -In Ln L) awO M U m M g? N n O n w I l` NMn 1'•�n N N N N �w n A L'imMOM 1 .p0 .00� M nOI M W® M �q« � qN�� N N 141 N O m a a 0W O�o+MbQO04mmM 1 N '0O :000 �NNnO CO11pMN O 0 UyO �nN d N 0 . 0 0 0 0 oO o p O 0 0,0 F-N 1 O L!7 O "Ip 0 O C C O O O 0wL'iI ma.< .� pONN 1 NON PQ N N NMNO NN W � _n n O 0 ra d 2 I W d d W d C I z o a cc O 0 e Ox F 4 z t~- L y a ` a¢ a oU Z a p. a•.n .-O .-i d LU H -J X V a T d co T ¢ > C d C7 d W O F C »h J C��Z 1=i. V OO ui W - .13 Tw O U rt O a w N F m� di m� mY md41 v m 7..t r v o n ..l I- cpm¢ w W C t9 7 fA ¢ F- C L) F¢• W 7 F- ¢ 6 u O S tL O Fa•• O. O ch v 1N N MOO 10 M rtl C Qv NIt OC On OO0W0 A C, M yCa 00 41 d .y p 'D070 ¢M non i 10 p qn C n v o oLOw10 d (�N r w NN N 0 8, m iF eM m 000 tl C4 m � p mnIh a, ae� a N a M qN 'D'A.r M �Onm O a m O V.� v M m ¢w N N M L - w U N -jN r-1 h a-1 Q1 0 N 'C all M M a , M ¢C, A M N n T tg M �p q N CM M U w CN H Ch Or p n W m Ohi L W. of a.. W ¢ tT M< lo 111 N f\ tim I m m; O�m a �,.. O 08 O m m F..tl A 117 111 In C 01 O w mar m mr cq Lu \ m LIjOp s o 0 00 00 .^+ .n-1 m a O N Lu � cplc4 ra O my rn z � $ An o �a o HI Lu5 u O' B O. � n W -� . � a C7Ia. O d D Y � Hd ^!W S o N,£ 1 a aT re o c N A %. p W Is ac � vd W H dO W i .di H J U p L E N 1 C + ¢ tl N eD �� W d a V. 3 o a O lei. u d dK. N V d O W N C C y a ¢ o C C N N to Ri £ O W I J k- J J cr) m O m C5 O 71 u G5 c. C d L ¢ In u- N N W p tl O G M N Q c W v N O O N p1 m Inh c OLo ID, rl m f ••i d 41 3 C �O O`WQ'� 4 N 10 Lo w lo 0 CIS N 21•.a cl� d O 01 N tl M Q O C LD H ,w .QQIIe v L d W rl O L w m p mm wF^ �.1 N III 116•.� J ¢ N m m .-i Ifs Q n O M cl.10 W C �I N (9 N w b M m NC'd1 _ ¢w, a c W l) m W m '+ N O @ N O - n W rn WL)of 1 b O m _W o ' t w m O Q O � to O m LU LL � � a uj �Q O @ m c N F 3 1 i O b y Q O N 24 m` O [r d 2 0 a - O L IV WN L .q. tl R d C H K W u L a,m H z u N X o V as CO o m o J L h r�•a . CL rd u m a 1 w @ G J O N Y m� a v a•...«+Y F J CD 1; o. o w O m 0 0 0 0.`, qua @ m d r6 Y J I! ^ J C m! o O 8 N O` gi N I1 N r L N L fts R Ctco CD ry @OC m tr C} M T O' 2C, Ab a,O O O O Om L h.:a emO.am r1nO.DO.:i.QO a Wm v v v '. i b O'.e h N..�m 1p C.e m h I N O .rO J L a h O.. ^10�:O•+ ..w m i OOOC I IaO aj LWm0 O a N ~ O 4ONO0NIn 00 L M O O O r mwO-�.1eh0D 0 tl1MnaNMy O OOAr 1MN0 ,C OO0Nm O O041W Or� ^- rs N O ...p N C)l OO Islem a rfl O... O O 7rn WaInrnwOe a O O a N N ON wNw O (n mvm N IO nx r m U1 an r a r.0 N O N ..m O CSIm •-•�' OO�O O II LJ GP+l erh w 11tmON0 O OO� O r� Maehr �ernOu7 maO �OO m � yI P O w v N e .rl vm rn N e v a m N tR7 N w a Q a O H a CL m W Ln.-. + L Lyl i a Wm rn U m b m m rn 1+ d U ti W L H H m V d en.ua N• .+ UO d¢ d u L .. N L u L n L L i. } M u L1! i-1 •w N > a • a a a n a a N O W ccN a fA !S L > rn �••>NN .uia Nw W O0. 0. U W�'^`S. a L LV L 0 O .. fn 0 W 0w41 w aaa a+ a, 4, m w H h•to 3 co 7 N 7 L Y O O }W I^ 0 ed nO mO a % m 1A H hY n w iso.+ a s a s � am z 'a W 6n a s f6 u C IE 21, • C C6 r•L•L•L J 2 O L 41 C O L 16 O N f6 W Y a 16 'L R a L m a a a AJ a U 41 4J O a r6 M •� a r6 2 a RS r6 O M m m U ~ ?d)d£ c7 J I,.d £U J _ld£c1 en£ £E �i •UN _ (( 4 X C V pp T O E Ifi Od i vaeN n..1 Nam 0m O10 ne ^v N1mroONb 0 1D1I N O1D OO OOOOu'1'OO nPNh QR6SOLa <w Po U NC�Ili n Qa In t p II a.1.1 LO 6• 3 d m '•`u'1 r N w Ill m w]rC4 MnC tD M Ill N w N M r X Lw � .-I Ot-Uo . dmO P o w �n m v 10 M N N +� r N I c m � t r •r� j I l �sN j N b Ca„ECy1 4 w^Tw O W 10 M OMOw w IlO Co b N+ lA rn MP N a! O O ¢. v r h 10 1n a A P P 9��j m coI mw A e v m r O r r L S C N rI ?V w 1n a LL')a C:t 4 M'a A m ar .•�n m l0 . �� A 10 C 1p CA v 0 lf1 mN v rn M A O 10 m 0 t0 .•� I h rn O C 141-m .^F .r Nw N^1I 10 10 e O r � 14 NO N p M�Lf GD �I9 i�/l•�+ n v n m 1 W fW„ { O K tiNl� ti ti M v N K f W �� vu',w N•K r w 0 I i Um PK N �mbc� K �rn� M W ! 0 1 [ a i d n N O+ Q K Ci N ulal CO Mm pI r I�N� II4 � We � �- a n. tv 0 r Um v14 1.+0 :'OhN01 QM� r H W W W v Z m J 41 a I-i O yoi B a+ > R SI ~ F" C V M L L N y v L H W O d pW mBLN.+ nLN'°fs cL y O OY L d ad y C N�dy 0 �N`'8 m ulI J p%N n 0 ON M in W -� p u..� O.L d Cp L y C 2 O L y m u ~ O L N O L ,N..a of l8 v n5 B a £U C a £[� J N O.£U ¢ M N N O n O 2 X 800 0 p K v K N M O2 Q fa7 OSI N Q+ON sn M M N C3 m 00 o r, N N K�. M�D N v P1 O K NI M W[O N N K O� ^n B b to O OI -, N �. Natm� Pvti mO N 6 cc tD W Ln m 6 W .. •.lrm p o 6 LL IN N I sC v^N N M gym./VJ N QIOs p .„m mmp comma m mo ml >r W: v.b N Of �[!M m O w 1Ni v .O•� C 1t1 O, m t�N Q'to h �O.d 4 � ss LO Y ma..LnN � �m�.:",mn b v�..O� my C w pi� !ff O ^N h O�d• a�U�O? m M 1� O W m e M C an N N N v n n n i Wm m C en N� O N M N S i ' N w a- m f\ .-a m.u7 W vb Oo ti to.p h OIQ N to N b C D.f tib 1 m m r a rn j rn O o 0 0 w p d cj Ld b N Q. O..m N N LL'1 C w A t ..o+ +a+ �o !n N .-.O ^NON v �n O a Lo 1 w a W Q••�N Q u7 1f1.? O a� ti b m tl1 sn m �!11 m 1 Qt h fs ' v- m vm m•• m v v0.b 1 .n C wI lo M N N N 4 O 0.m N N :C) K 'N N-- 8 m m�:O I N O C Ob � ®J r n N m m i m n n m m O!n�+ m Wm mU C' '+tn v�b N N vtA to OI m !n 1 v Oy 1 xft T N N O N N !fl C-4 I !•�G� !n N a m o. u' o. W L r f6 gg W d v d Y Y Y Z a m L a v W `y £O n O m d » E d £ a r 2 Z Y a U Y U U °. d o r ra G a 3 n d i cb In all L u! .O+ a s W O p W H H d ,V. x d U L L •� d a .. N..Ey cn tb i N td 3 L '." O U L Y c d 1d aJ .C-! d Ki .Ui is N 7 kc �" W Oi fA m0 ow nq GN 5 W fa (Y 61 J L C fM6 E L fE. ^� O L 1�s d �C O L Y J. m a m N H d O L Y C Y 4 �L N O OIL Y'.! W L Y fb LY .L r a m m d ,I m d r0 B rt 0. L) Q L V m£V Y 0.m£ U [ J b J O J <c 1•-! i. 6 2 ¢ m N h r Y m o o d O N r N r N N r r L inOOln iD "' p 1 p tAClO[! a+ U)N OON -Mrn a+ 1 m N sn bl ? N m a! N C a• W' m N U 1 n'Onw wfN� ^' a d { lc W m b ` � n•1 N 1�h Q 1 Q n m 4 .-f m m N b (� I� apt N m O N �_.. v m m I N N C .•! O^ .R•! 7 u'1 f7N N S m F mI N N O i w �O in O n worn '-..I ®� !L]mmb1�n n O�tn G1 4: FF N M N ill N:O b B.n1 n d !n b CT O m U I u m R N N C m e•+D• .+ m h � r N "�i11 a+ w b N G1 v to fib.'.N-,NIM N v.^•!N .�-1 fd CO NN 1mr v aim O apm N lib V^ i`.N b.Wn r•O vbma'a+ a tl� d'N h v N w e•! � �...! N n H L d 'n nl Q W p. N N I Q t0 b N p L 41 m vcw to 1 v N.a w rn 4 'OmA v M m ? g u 0 W A C O i�to m Pi jn - o LoC? ? ..a Lno "1 M Q �P� , I m cap m � II el 11 i p n m Ot P O Y fW.. t0 Ot? II MyI C W Q W ml M m O:I �I '�' OI r' m `� O � L d C m 0 m O N N m W u't rl W m W v h rr 0 � � ^ W x ! O r 1111 N W w J C7I v C3 W p d K H Oy » .Vi Y n-Ui W L d � w zd N U E}. O L O Oa M W ¢N N O d.U)-1 O L M O rra .0 uj 41 J OL .I+ O m m a-.. c ¢ L 41YH L J-t N pd,d E V J J T, .•+ .-+ ¢ M �I v oon ;ng00 moom o rn0 0 w ? oto cn O in to � E rd CJ. gM vh? O� mhmh Y Ir U N N tll N tN.l L a c M m t7+t 0 IL-0 ? O L' J M T10 -0 r-, O ¢ N v D\C O t0 0t P M 1 N41 m m tf7 N b i^.H e}• UY M 01 m�� d h 01 P� .p 10rl d a P n La rn D` m w�i o m U m rwi:�'- N i - C)'m m jr m r Li I m O m F M is o � � � W � w o� v `o. itA.� :. U ® m� w � v s a. H rn m `� .ri m r H . w d L I d X u V L C r. W wc rm CI m o I �. O Wp . W � 4 O�e L 9 O H � H 7W CI N d N G) 'ort l6v OM Z d vvv�vvv eV..d W ii44 Y O OI U d d..fie d T T T T T T T T T r W X V V U V U U U U u L >n W r G r C C C r C r t_ W X m d d d d d d d d d U F o �w o a L mmmma o rnmOCU,+ H , d S 5 r w d L L y i+++i+- 4 a 6 a w "rrs ; orcccc r_ sg z o a a o a o 0 0 0 0 `o o w ta„ d -VUL) t3 V UUU a O C J N as J J . KI H Ln m Q.6J m M R N 8 N cc m nen b i Nn� ? } Q m N bO k N w � m m N O ti ti O O -I-0 m N p1 t o p1 �m4�a� p1 a y�l 1 m 1 � a� IOP I bN Ul go O M 0 '.m rn P P �' W l . 4.m r O. :ti ti N N P h .O b O+ e0 m m t,'o y. K p 'n 0 N o+�.d+ b O O h b t0 F b C M N U Op W I n N N I N N h ..y N : N b -.�.-+ d O• W ` r,'n h Ci m O+ Of N N O LOO m ONOO..OIN N W O S b Fu'f ® NM I Q 1..0 mM�m m p1 N O sn b 01 b I M1 P b b d�C b 1 Nen .� b W K 0 F H a La W cr n. a c W LU L s COc F o,. v w C LO 3 Y L d E W B ✓+ 7 W F•J -° U f a a M O a .E i Y Y CG ¢ O a W tL L Co.LL —0 m L (Cy f=- ¢F H c H F rE Y rS 30 m aJ o E old 0. w m> 0 C:3 NO.Cn .x 7 W C 6 m a GH7 p ¢ H a w 41 O w L a> G iS rJ N a U W 2 q• I I I I o O W E 7 N a x w U w U .c co CI fn 0 » w a M W H N L?- J O L C C C C U Y a L ¢ W O > C a1- W3Y M O O p i•.. t- w W iy to M ::- of w LL A 0 W U..+Y.N Y Y 0.0 2 A N ri 41 O F J N v rt t~6 O Ce•'� C B 0 R. L C O C O L L L L•�+d C T Y U H p¢ ti M L•N Y A E a a a a P8 Y a O_ a u F �� aaasic ., o a a - ¢ F H O +�•+ O V HO-¢O 000 w fi$ n.0 d U O tJT ¢ U' j0- wJNJ¢ g�g .� Nmdi010�O-+ Ix ¢ .0 N F — N — N r 1..1 N (•J.-i .-�F CCOV?J N N N N N N fn N m ? to Lo �O I w O � m �I pf p1 pI n rn rn �I}.o pI io .r ao aF.. 1 1 1 I �1TOm� I �O 10 Cn d N 114N ¢N �.. I O 1 Op q� q� o P Cli cobO d < ® N 1�q-7 0 0 d d 4 m W F L POLICY 11.4.2 11.4.2 IN THE TIGARD TRIANGLE DESCRIBED IN POLICY 11.4.1, THOSE PARCELS f DESIGNATED FOR ANY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT DEVELOP FOR, SUCH ; USE, IF NOT ALREADY 'SO DEVELOPED, UNLESS A MAJOR COLLECTOR, CONNECTING THE AREA ON PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT APPROXIMATELY 78th AVENUE> AND THE WESTERLY PORTION OF RAINES' ROAD %INTERCHANGE AT INTERESTATE 5 FREEWAY (AT APPROXIMATELY 69th AT DARTMOUTH) BE CONSTRUCTED, BE GUARANTEED WITHIN ONE YEAR FOR CONSTRUCTION BY-A PUBLIC AGENCY, OR BE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION AS ,A PART OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT f AFTER THE REMONSTRANCE AND REVIEW PERIOD HAVE EXPIRED. ry� THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT APPLY TO PARCELS THA ( Zr- n (a). LIE SOUTH OF HAMPTON STREET. ►O (b), HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO�ACIFIC HIGHWAY, HIGHWAY 217, OR INTERSTATE 5 FREEWAY /BY BEING LESS THAN 1000' FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY OR THE INTERCHANGE RAMPS OF HIGHWAY 217 OR INTERSTATE 5.F- J, (c) HAVE ACCESS WITHIN 300' TO� ATLANTA STREET, 68TH ";AVENUE, OR HAMPTON STREET BY AN ACCESS ROAD BUILT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ROAD STANDARDS. t f 1 3, b M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council November 14, 1983 FROM: Mayor Bishopf/ SUBJECT: Library - Police e�cvic Center Vote The ''abstract of votes apparently will not be available until our meeting of Monday,> November '21 1983. On that date, we will also be having a Town Hall meeting of City residents and I feel it would be a good time for Council to discuss a plan on rental of City facilities, as the residents have so closely decided in their vote of November 8, 1983. WB/Pn h November 10, '1983 M E M O R A N D U M TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILLORS FROM: FRANK CURRIE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: TIGARD AVENUE/115th STREET BID OPENING This bid opening occurred on Thursday, November 10, 1983 at 3.00 p.m.' This item is being added for your consideration as agenda Item #;9. t CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON s COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t i, ` o � AGENDA ITEM h: AGENDA.OP: N--,v- 14, 1983 PREM--;US ACTION: DATE SUBt4ITTED: Nov. 10, 1983 0— ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: TIGARD AVE/115th ------ REQUESTED BY: fae c STPEET BID OPENING CITY ADMINISTRATOR: — DEPARTMENT MEAD OK: =m INFORMATION SUMMARY lease find a listing of the bidders and -their bids from a low bid Attached of $157,537.69 to a high bid of $265,071.00. sday, November 10, 1983 at The bid opening was held as advertised on Thur 3 00 p.m. in Tigard City Hall. ' � Inc. of'Portland with a bid of The apparent low bidder is C.G. Gredvig, $157,537.69. The engineer's estimate is $159,587.85 m®rsmmvusa¢awjceammffima¢mamnmmaemmarx`awaa¢mmoma¢�mmaeoem¢ma¢¢ �aaa¢Gs¢.asacte aemaa---------------- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED P e L mrs aa¢raaesmaacamam+ea¢aa............maa a - ......a®aa.mt.¢.ffim1Em&Ta4.PYa98mata ffi¢..tYA¢4.mm�®t RCmmaiana¢¢® SLsGGEST£D ACTION Int.'s low bid of $157,537.69. Staff r_eco"flends acceptance of C.G.Gredvig, TIGARD AVENUE 115th STREET RECONSTRUCTION BID OPENING 1. C. G. GREDVIG, INC. $ 157,537.69 2. PORTER-YETI CO. 170,095.90- 3. RUTAN CONSTRUCTION_' 170,274.15 4. BAKER ROCK 174,526.60 5. OREGON ASPHALTIC 185,841.79 x 6. PARSONS EXCAVATING 193,711.60 f Y 7. K-& G CONSTRUCTION 194,070.77 8. PARKER-NORTHWEST 194,175.35 9. KEN LEAHY 218,720.05` 10. FABRICATORS, INC. 257,344.75 ii. CASCADE CONSTRUCTION 265,071..00 CITY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $ 159,587.85 T;s,-�, -e:�=^SFk.e� 'ten• .�� _..-.:._-_.. �.:� x ' �•'§ ? '�: u-� ._4i....Ls e4 _�.mss' _�,_-�.,..r,L� ....� ,,.<- -,._�. •Aa ��, '— ,N e fir. ME l3 �Yr s �f t 1 1 • •t �� •• • •� •D • • , ••• r e 71, �4;< -r� ill• • � �5�vs �` • �• �s rk'�e KKgs x�"�N, • • 't',�� Et ��€nay Ys•�: � �• x�``�, 3i r s ol qui E, ti F, T 1 s �-r�'?-.- "�' � �" •;�-.�" .r -i. -=�._M.. v:-� �"'t.,+�� r t r±a�- jiS�`::�. �r-r� ,. � y.c:� ,r� „ `�.- �s;,� .�...,"�" ,..a�'� -rte r''r*� gym:h�F v ,•,�.,�..: Nil i RECEIVED 1 V U V - 19 JJ t q ,;: k'..=r-,=�d F f_J 1 1 r l 1 - .11'!_r ii QTY QF TIGARD t-r 1 e ti,7 s - - -I t.rl:•atir•,-r [ ,, _i_J;,fit i.l t`1 tr_ ki..:iI o4- ,a,., ,'„ _ 1ro t i:_ -a m-,rith _ irtce I''.7 t t- oi 1 1 tr,e S t at:e .tor r_r- 1tai.'1. h.' -fir e }h_.F-o•-. ar,d t,' j :n r!d .=.ri 3 _ i 17-19 v,U t _ = 1,'..' 1.`' t,! .+..c,r d. h i e t h i r,k: : -1 - .�C.l ] j t. _'}� J t _en arn� h! F"..._' t:t'u7,t tti i.Y,3= r7' - goi3i9 int:•l _ at h 'it"d, Patt,_` _o((t ri!+_J L_ "t:o Ltjriclon about tO Ji 't1r.t_._ 1 week b—:' Brifi i-hR.a i I- .e t r1 _' t.,_ r,7 i L :_lrlri __r,iinr, 1:n... , - J .F D.t_�:C. .!t - r-,i_,e.J r_ 57:r,! r:�lJ7 t:-L_-. ,=tan r ead or 1,.1r-ite di.tt' tt!_i rt-tii+. tirfie.. She i r e-zi ,fiP cl�ti -t ._:.r.,to t:. i t i S h te:i._h_r'_ in.. tt-ieIr'': wort<:. (.1Lrtd h, '`= Ie-3r-rt ed ':)U t e ,1 bit 't._ br-r1 n--i r,a,�k. t tier:' i„t y =he think-. i1. h,:3. b e-r-I w e 1 1 worth trlC •t.itfie- 'H_ •{'or ,6 d. :ei"- 1 a.if] t.2 k.:irl'2 two '-:tr'al Q: :.,,40 ._1as_es , :. 1ri in Fidrtfi n i s J. t:t'.'_ L(1W (Judicial Review o+ Admin;:,Ott .l. At)e Action) and Jurisprudence, and another law related tour se`• dealing 'with;`Law and Politics and tauslht h'a an American "F'�r_C'ri!.11t ho h c,riald ;iiworkir•I• a ta.riiou_ teacher, and writer. So it seams :sometimes that I 've died and gone to heaven. I have another class deallrf9 ifJith't he to?rk.s ,_,t. another• F•er:[t.n 'I ' r(, do � -J t an---Augustine ,F _ 1ri•_ <rit•_ hexa_ c,-P H i r po. Then Ihave two Iangua9e _Lo. .s F_--or,e ir-+ Lat:in f triter^mediate, to get 'rn'=i Proficiency uei and another. in; :: lo.__ i' jl Greek, which is helpful iri rr!.'d work:'. in addition to classes, I ' m doins: a thesis, thE• ori1�4 thing t.,�'----rai,t f`;f`' rtti earl—e : It r!!u__h be ;L,_t.!J,_er-1 11: 11_;_I. and ,I_,•;1s - i and ort '! topic t be :worked ked1 iu"t betwee `, (II L t r.d -i s u P t• r k j or'`.. ! ' rt, � - - rtieetiro-D _v e r d 7.( or So with rtl'd sw�-er-vi-Sor and doing ___ _.d_ -for hi:lru In order-.' to do some _r::F`l Qr-'a.tlor•" in rw=:i 4:ield be+or'e I ' _t.7.?`t "1JY'it:in'? 'rud ti-Iasi= 1 hope to turn in the +_omF in Jur-ie. 'i'c:u wof.d l d al I be a.frius_d to see - F'ra t t.. ,r:�, I r"j,1 i r-,-P -our !i,_.a,=1 e= t r-h r_,t_Jg ti =tr eet= o-F t_f;a4:or''rl. It' '_ much L''r better r have .3. [ k tt!a.r _o.r' to 'fie+ a.r _unit tt}t!fr: and to use the 'B'ust:'r E:r).t-3 ih-! F•:a.l l Y'!?r [ _r--,g e -C r _F._ VIE• a.i iC, t,�.F.::e a.,Il:'a.t1t7.�e ttt ttfe _t_Jt •-.i! i E d rtf=4,ji' t gn tc, t;t}e c!I1r'��. ' c ,iir'!irl'� hia.l i at7out t.'t,fic,_ a. week -For tor•r(fa.l mealsltifth r-,ther college residents ' there rf - at--e about 400 students it-1 tl.lr ara.cis rind ur! er ,r ni . Th= ,(:C-a 1 _'= F less th crl 1:2. 00 eafzho arid, _orribiI d Witt, the subsidies -tor trarisF'_,r- ta.ti_tri r,ak. r-. Fi+ i -h tuderci:_= a F•r•i, Sed I ,t. I Irl ver, t: attended ,,ri Il::;tord it�t I_ -,_,r•._ll rit?_ t.ir;•�: •=,=t, t?ut I sus Pec+ t:hi tt ltht _, a. 1 !_ fief t!1r't•h,+ 'th ar, thl,4t-e in Ti9a.rd mostly because th big d:ac i si:_:r,s (._Fending limits and genet ali. are rfi D. e 7.t the national level 'arid Planning deci irris can be ler-t,_Jr'r'ied C''d -he Minister elth_ Sece-e- tc.r :� .o+ stcte or the E rf'.:'i r'arirttent f or _ver! 9ra.rit• •rl, r-1,!t_w i th!s+,:.r,d i r,w C.cc.l e r nTu e rtt... 1i aF Ft r-kJa,1 . `3a, istfe Ie9a.t -anr! F•it 1't:1,-,71 '-1_ ir(ia tE• -+ -1 -_ F,_re i_ er-' •;i tter.•' 7,t fr +.r(i thia.t of 0r'e9c,ri. d'' f,r.F=*E• .ic'LJ 7.r,�- .7.;. 1 !Ja11 a.rt - -I_;.F-.r_ 01-1. 1'- _,k.: {:,_,r(j-. -rr_ h-,,=Qr'ir-I'a -!_l,J r. J, _t.a 'r1�itJ, t'_;. l ti,7'.; :+rr.:l(i. lrif• ... _ ._ �I,ric: 1 troth _ _.ri our r=Sn.t-d �. t c :'.1 o f ,r/ e E