The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 08/08/1983 t ► TIGARD CITY CObNCILi PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate AUGUST 8, 1983, 7:30 P.K. sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ask to be recognized by the Chair. Non-agenda LECTURE ROOK items are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less and are heard at the discretion of the Chair. 1. REGULAR MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff, Council h Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda 2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 2.1 Approve Council Minutes - July 18, 1983 2.2 Approve Resolution No. 83-73 Accepting Improvements In Lynz Court Subdivision 2.3 Approve Resolution No. 83-74 Accepting Improvements In Walmar Subdivision 2.4 Approve Resolution No. 83-75 To Sell City Property 2.5 Receive and File: o TCYS June Monthly Report and Annual Report o Business Tax Ordinance Review Memo From Finance Director o Transmittal from METRO re: Washington County Elected Officials Caucus o Transmittal from NPO #3 re: Nomination of Milt Fyre to the Planning Commission o Transmittal from NPO #3 re: Transportation Plan Concerns 2.6 Affirm The Assignment of Reimbursement Rights From Amart to AFC/ALI RECESS COUNCIL MEETING 3. TURA MEETING 3.1 Cali to Order and Roll Call 3.2 Business Meeting 3.3 Adjournment RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING 4. SW 113TH AVENUE STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Department o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Staff Response o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council o ORDINANCE NO. 83- Adopting Vacation of Street 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS - PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 o CPA 4-83 Cash's Realty NPO #2 (continued from 7-25-83) 5.2 o CPA 5-83 Scheckla/Breed/Bissett NPO #6 5.3 o CPA 6-83 Dakota Greenway Condominiums NPO #7 5.4 o CPA 9-83 Gallo's Vineyard/Herb Morissette NPO #7 5.5 o CPA 10-83 Krueger/135th & Scholls Ferry Road NPO #7 o Public Hearing Opened o Summation by Planning Department o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Staff Response o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council t 6. DEVELOPMENT CODE PUBLIC HEARING - CPA 2-83 t o Public Hearing Opened A o Summation by Planning Department o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Staff Response o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration by Council 7. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under 1.2 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1)(d) & (1)(h) to discuss labor relations and pending litigation. 9. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 8, 1983 (lw/0316A) T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop (arriving 9:30 PM); Councilors: Tom Brian , John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla (arriving 7:35 PM) and Ima Scott; City Staff: Frank Currie, Director of Public Works; Doris Hartig, City Recorder; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Director of Planning & Development; and Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel. In the absence of the Mayor and President of Council, Councilor Brian chaired the meeting. i 2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL & AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA o Council requested the following items be pulled from consent agenda and considered under open agenda. 0 2.4 Approve Resolution No. 83-75 to sell City Property. 0 2.5 (2) Receive and File Business Tax Ordinance Review Memo from Finance Director. o Councilor Scott requested report on SW 72nd Ave. LID property waivers. COUNCILOR SCHECKLA ARRIVED AT 7:35 PM AND CHAIRED THE MEETING AS PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL. i 3. APPROVE MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1983 (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 83-73 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN LYNZ COURT SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF THE PERFORMANCE BOND 'THEREFOR. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 83-74 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN WALMAR SUBDIVISION. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 6. RECEIVE AND FILE o TCYS June Monthly Report and Annual Report o Transmittal from METRO re: Washington County Elected Officials Caucus o Transmittal from NPO #3 re: Nomination of Milt Fyre to the Planning Commission. t[ 0 Transmittal from NPO #3 re: Transportation Plan Concerns 4 PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 f (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. AFFIRM THE ASSIGNMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT RIGHTS FROM AMART TO AFC/ALI (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 8. COUNCIL RECESSED AT 7:36 PM AND RECONVENED AS TURA BOARD. ROLL CALL: Chairman Kenneth Scheckla, Board Members Tom Brian, John Cook and Ima Scott. Director of Planning and Development discussed the TURA Financial statement noting the report had to be prepared by August 1, 1983 and will be published August 11th and 18th. The report will be filed with the governing body by September 1, 1983. TURA MEETING ADJOURNED 7:44 PM AND RECONVENED AS CITY COUNCIL. 9. S.W. 113TH AVENUE STREET VACATION (a) Public Hearing Opened. (b) Staff gave summation of request. i (c) Public Testimony: o Leonard Scheckla, 10200 SW Durham Road, adjoining property owner stated he had no objections to the vacation. o Staff noted a typographical error in proposed ordinance and requested Section Five and Exhibit "A" legal description be amended to read 20 feet instead of 2 feet. (d) Public Hearing Closed. (e) ORDINANCE NO. 83-37 AN ORDINANCE VACATING SW 113TH AVENUE, A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. (f) Motion by Councilor Brian, second by Councilor Scott to adopt as amended. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 8, 1983 10. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 4-83 CASH'S REALTY NPO #2 (Continued from r" 7-28-83) (a) Public Hearing Opened. (b) Staff reported the amendment was a result of the Council action designating this area as low density residential on the comprehensive plan map. Staff and Planning Commission recommended changing the plan designation to medium high designation for all. lots described and that Tax Map 2S1 IAB - Tax Lot 1201 be changed to medium plan designation. (c) Public Testimony o Marshall Sunnarbort, 7670 SW Varns Street property owner of Viking Apts. , Tax Map 2S1 2AB - Tax Lot 1200 requested Council adopt Planning Commission recommendation. (d) Public Hearing Closed. (e) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian directing staff to prepare the proposed ordinance and bring back for Council approval. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 11. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 5-83 SCHECKLA/BREED/BISSETT NPO #6 (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Staff summarized their report noting the Planning Commission voted to recommend a change on subject properties to medium density with a planned development overlay and a density range of 6-12 units per acre with the lower density along Picks Landing and the river and high density along Durham Road. (c) President of Council Scheckla removed himself from the Council Chair and Councilor Brian presided. (d) Public Testimony o The following testified: o Marie Breed, P.O. Box 83, Forest Grove, supported medium density for the area. o Bibianne Scheckla, 10890 SW Fairhaven Way, Tigard, representing Lucy Scheckla, property owner of Tax Lot 500 requested medium density. o Leonard Scheckla, 10200 SW Durham Road, property owner of Tax Lot 700 supported medium high density for the area. o Phil Pasteris, 8935 SW Pinebrook, Chairman of NPO #6 reported the NPO is in support of the Planning Commission proposal. o Gary L. Fox, Sr. , 10050 SW Serena Way, President of. the Homeowners Association spoke to adequate buffering and reported the homeowners felt it was a good plan. PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 (e) Council and staff discussed the amount of buffering recommended, noting the PD overlay and buffering would be addressed at time of development. (f) David H. Craig, 10155 SW Jurgens Lane reported residents across the Tualatin River were concerned that an adequate amount of buffering along the river would be provided and that the character of the neighborhood would not be changed. (g) Staff reported they supported the Planning Commission recommendation. (h) Public Hearing Closed. (i) Council and staff discussed increased traffic on SW Durham Road as a result of development, as well as providing in writing for a buffer zone along Picks Landing and the river. Staff reported the map will show A-12 with P.D. (j) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott that staff prepare an ordinance following the Planning Commission recommendations and showing the first buildable 100' against Picks Landing and River as R-5 PD. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. CHAIRMAN BRIAN TURNED MEETING BACK OVER TO PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL SCHECKLA. 12. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 6-83 DAKOTA GREENWAY CONDOMINIUMS NPO #7 (a) Staff pointed out that the NPO was not notified of this matter and recommended Council remand this item to the Planning Commission so they would have an opportunity to speak. (b) Nancy Robbins, NPO #7 Chairman, 12815 SW Summer Street read letter to Council requesting item be returned to Planning Commission so they would have an opportunity to speak. (c) Discussion followed regarding remanding the item and whether Council wished to take any testimony tonight. Consensus was to open public hearing to only hear testimony for remand discussion. (d) Public Hearing for discussion regarding remanding item to Planning Commission Opened. o Richard Boberg, 10660 SW North Dakota noted the Planning Commission vote and felt they should have more facts. o Hendrik E. Vollmullen, 11000 SW 106th stated he would not be here when Planning Commission hears this matter and wanted to make a point at this time. ( (e) Council suggested he write a letter to the Planning Commission giving them his viewpoints. PACE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 (f) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to remand to Planning Commission and provide for notice and discussion to the NPO. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 9-83 GALLO'S VINEYARD/HERB MORISSETTE NPO #7 (a) Director of Planning and Development reported the NPO had not been notified. (b) Nancy Robbins, NPO #7 Chairman, 12815 SW Summer Street stated the NPO had not had a chance to discuss the matter and were not notified of the Planning Commission hearing. (c) Carol Hardie, 11800 SW 113th Place, Tigard testified she had not received notice of the matter. ed he felt the NPO (d) Hans Vatheuei, representing the applicant, report should be notified and would work with them. (e) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to remand to the Planning Commission for next meeting and the NPO will hear in the [ . interim. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 14. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 10-83 KRUEGER/135TH & SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD (a) Staff gave summary on this property and recommended adoption of the Cp designation as it is the closest to the Washington County designation before the property was (b) public Testimony. None (c) Staff recommended approval of the Planning Coissionouter c oremation, noting page 6 of the staff reported pointed issues to be resolved regarding the neighborhood commercial area. cilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott that an (d) Motion by Coun ordinance be prepared approving the zone as adopted by the Planning Commission, deleting all reference to Murray Road Extension Ro n the and report, and change to "This street connecting Scholls Ferry SW 135th". Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (e) Russell Krueger, applicant, reported to Council he wanted to compliment staff for encouraging and helping in the process over the past few years. MEETING RECESSED 8:47 PM AND RECONVENED AT 9:20 PM. PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL TURNED MEETING OVER TO MAYOR BISHOP. PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 15. DEVELOPMENT CODE PUBLIC HEARING CPA 2-83. (a) Public Hearing Opened. (b) Mayor Bishop noted the public hearing would be continued to Tuesday, August 9, 1983, at the Durham Plant. (c) Staff reviewed with Council their summary memo and discussed how to proceed, noting they had included an errata sheet which detailed the changes and additions to the code as recommended by the Planning Commission in their public hearings. The staff noted the Attorney's memo was not addressed by the Planning Commission due to the lateness of its submission. Associate Planner then reviewed the sections and referenced the changes with the errata sheets. Council discussed specific changes and new data. o Council discussed tree removal section suggesting a permit would be required when vacant land develops and recommended that a tree 6 inches in diameter four feet above the ground be referenced in 18.42 removal section. o Councilor Scott and staff discussed the satellite dish receiving section of the code. Director of Planning and Development commented he had requested an individual representing the industry to be present at the hearings. o Geraldine L. Ball, representing D.J.B. , Inc. and herself, 11515 S.W. 91st, submitted letter and transcript of testimony given at July 12, 1983 Planning Commission meeting. o Mark Baker, 4905 SW Seymour Court, Portland, representing kindergarten/daycare centers spoke of his concern regarding traffic in residential neighborhoods. He urged they be allowed in commercial zones and supports the recommendation in the errata sheet. o Councilor Brian suggested daycare centers be considered in light industrial park zones. o William C. Cox, 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. , Portland, Oregon, representing Robert Randall Co. expressed his concern regarding CBD zone and the effect on security/storage buildings. He noted the restriction in the code has caused loss of some businesses in locating in their building. He proposed the CBD zone have added language regarding re-occupancy of existing business types. o Council, staff and Cox_ discussed the issue noting City Attorney has said the City couldn't give blanket approval but must give approval for each particular occupant for a particular location and blanket approval does not meet the requirements. City Administrator suggested Council appoint a sub-committee to work on the problem. Public Hearing was continued to August 9, 1983, 7:30 P.M. at the Durham Treatment Plant. PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 16. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1.3 were discussed at this time. 16.1 City Administrator inquired regarding the appointment of a sub-committee to work on re-occupancy of conditional use problem. Consensus was to try to work out a date and membership. 16.2 BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE REVIEW MEMO FROM FINANCE DIRECTOR (a) City Administrator noted City had received several complaints lately from small businesses and asked that a committee be appointed to look at the situation and report back to Council with recommendations. Discussion was held regarding the consideration of a stepped rate for size of business. (b) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Brian to have staff review rates and report back to Council. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council. 16.3 Councilor Brian suggested City write METRO regarding a revision to the plan for the Southwest Corridor Study of the transportation plan. Staff responded Mayor has already sent in letter. 16.4 Councilor Scheckla noted the selling of aerial photos in the city and requested staff check out regarding business licenses. 10:50 P.M. COUNCIL RECESSED AND WENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION under provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d) and (1) (h) to discuss labor relations and pending litigation. 17. Meeting adjourned 11:20 P.M. C,Z ` City Recorder - City of gard ATTEST: 1 Mayor - City of Tigard i r i r r G r (DH:pl/0398A) P PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1983 ` Qi6, i3".f3 �'- �,s '-w •t.�.. .Jaw"ar � -q� 'b .k t'OQ� ar � -P� �j Ti 37`:'�.•s�c Q�. 's� �54' � '�a�'3h _.� ��'� �C.^°+�zrh� ^`_ ^ vim '�.,Fa"��Q }� �y � (�yj � �� fl i `. Tf�j�'l�..q•"'3.s. ytii'_ M. g jfyr "�CS' "''.GO.N1' G O O. 'k,➢-' v" v„..r' Yx ' K tjg rte. ��yyy...��, w y I cc) C< iz Oct O A U Ci 'O m m 'C I c asf U U Q Z, L r Irl cm ` r O m cc Zb c CL ' °� a cc 0 Iwo > F- —Of s LU M CO 't"H X N cn z 00 C, 03 m co U C .--I 00 04�A L_ A N ca 9V.f a M a. A— -B U �p m �7 N LL ^ A U Qf � ^ m i M ch IrWL 10 ss �' d U U r m q d G ::.�., O x m w W cs'sr�` o i po Q �2 a ocmoOC xx d to G 3 v,— m - iat -H C14 p cu H a ¢ En `CML 0 rn Go a o tD F- O U o -�, o PQb LL Op� ona 0.0cu0 c : > A> V: >: Q". ro O H w bo uj o vii 'c0 vwH ez cW ®gym c Z.!= G 0 CL s �. LL a ® ® aiC�1 .s�D m m as w IVv 4 cn E861 V MRnd gslignd—99I9.L.L a ;uawdolaeaa fllununuoo M7,..VdM%• `o n � 1, pooL#OdN Pleo*I Ajja3 SllogoS'a gaSEI/jaSana}I C"T-VdO • c L#OdN allaWpoW gJOH/PjeAauIA S.ollerJ b'8'ELi�ciO: •• L#OdN suinluluiopuoO AeWauaajO a;oxLa w 8 - 9#OdN llasslS/Paajg/elxuaAaS£8 S Yd CM oO <E8-5Z-L uioji PanuAuoo) Z#OdN f4lleaH s-RseJ Sg-k'VdO C-:7 :,;• Z SuljleaH ollgna-sluauipuau�uEld anlsuagajdwoo• cr VSupLaH allgnd uopeoeA laajlS anuanV ill£II&S- NoD3jao`ajjvf)LL`laaa.LS I.ntmvAA AAS 998oI. WOOH 32 nl_-"XI`'ZOOIDS HIDIW-dOINflf 2iH'IAA03 •Wa o£a`£8sI`s 3sn�nv . IDMJ.---raw IIV•Iflf)SH•IIJNnOo Aldo •ILIi^6£9 SuMeo Aq jo`£ZZL6 uoSajo.`pisgil`anuaAV xlsy AAS SSLZI c®i w sapxo3GH A 1:),Ol 1.uxoji poullelgo aq 6eui sepuase linl pule uoTI=Uojul jagl m-4 'Wn=joSul .Mo�S joj pagsllgnd a"stall lepuase palaalaS SUIIAoIIoI ag.L �• co Z /� CD Q V m v rn ca o o •� - - crn -O� t c o ® 5 o Co of V w Z @ O cr;c c m cn m , =O c07 ❑ ❑ > r o o I O Q) ` CL ¢ 4 Qcn m w U) cc CU p� O w.+ z Erle c d 0. Sdi w 0 � Z ro a) ca O o cm0 r o m ' 6 0 x @ ,i of Z m (o m c t ,V,'/! O LL c r O w N - m m 00 Ui d N w n 0 i-. of., U L °' m y Z0 m.0 r 41 = dG C cn ID O m w� qp Q n r-. ..0 30 h P O\ O Z .-q -�G.) c L- .0 c O ( C m CO c+1 Co lL Z S •.4 O c (1).e c 3: -0O` X. bo cn a1 U. O Cl) G �'"� �— ca C. Y '-' W r1 N $.e H O W3:: W >1 of a G c aQ ' ` > m 'S c o w o O ti C: m o 0o m c 0 o Pq $4 LL y o mom o > > c o E CO 0 -HO -HH Z N O°5 3- m c m c O H U CkoLL U P+ E-4 a= c m c., `o = a 6 > a LL t Da to I wish to testify before the Tigard City ( Council on the following item: (Please print your name) 1.3 CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR NON AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description 1 1 , s i i t Date 8/8/83 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: CPA 4-83 CASH'S REALTY NPO #2 Proponent (for) Opponent (against) game, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation e t Date I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 5,2 CPA 5--83 SCHECKLA/BREED/BISSETT NPO #6 Proponent (for) Opponent (against) ' Vame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation �C�M�GUIU�S hox SIC -`ooh 5w s&ral i c3 s �L ( V t �f - C V'cel 1 / Q/J S' S'W ,kt" e h I Date 8/8/83 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 5.3 b 3 DAKOTA .GREFI'IWAY;CONBOMII`IIL3M,Sf,NPO #7 Proponent (for) Opponent (against) dame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation L PCD roc, f a Date 8/8/83 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: CPA_ _83 GALLO's VINEYARD/HERB MORISSETTE NPO #7 roponent (for) Opponent (against) ame, Address and Affiliation N�n�e�,LAddreJ7 Affi iat,ior�7 1 J � u_l OL Date 8/8/83 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 5.5 CPA 10-83 KRUEGER/135th & SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD NPO # 7 . Proponent (for) Opponent (against) lame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation o--Y' I i 3w w *k 14 CO2 # �A ft Cd ft D a � ' os f W f � p tC CO ft @] �J H N spzspuamdoianaQf -�-- C* pus quamdoZanaa pus2f y uOtIva:), Llt[IIp� H 1-4 pus -auamdojanaQ% aiainaU quamdotanaa alts 7 my sLOYstnoza isquamaZddns x ?x ° rA �' ~ �azz�siQ �sZzanp� r� ae c juatuaztn az 19 suot:11?3t;ice x v cxi -sss1� 3atz3sla 2tutuOZft u ?isj„j uOisiaaQam zoj saznpaaoaalk suoistnoza Aaojanpoziulf x H ft f C.1 f H f ft to ft Do f ri f a o o a f N fft C+ ` v 1-42 L � � Ot v ;•� Ob t` g C42 ob ..7 1 i l CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY t AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM k: DATE SUBMITTED: July 28, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: Placed on maintenance ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Lynz Court Subd. 5/11/81 final acceptance REQUESTED BY: Engineering Dept. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Lynz Court was placed on maintenance May 11, 1981, but with economy so bad they have just now completed the project. ------------------------- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ----- -------------- a=aarsasea�=csa¢c i SUGGESTED ACTION Make final acceptance of Lynz Court of all public improvements and release their Performance Bond. { CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM k: _ DATE SUBMITTED: July 28, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: Placed on ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Walmar Subdivision ma'ntenance 4/10/78 Acceptance of Public Improvements REQUESTED BY: Engineering Dept. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Walmar Subdivision is located off S.W. Walnut Avenue near S.W. 124th Avenue. This project has been overlooked in the past. The developer has never asked for final acceptance. All improvements are in. sa==saxsxsxmxaaa=assaasxx=3axsxasssa3sc=_=a.x.cxxx==______-===c======-=x=x==c=x=__ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED SUGGESTED ACTION Acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Aum 1983 AGENDA ITEM b: q DATE SUBMITTED: _July 29, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE,/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution to sell City property REQUESTED BY: Jerri Widner DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY The City has three parcels of property that were determined to be surplus by the City Council and Budget Committee during the budget process for fiscal year 1983-84. The attached resolution places the order tosell in the records and orders an appraisal of the parcels . t _=s--�- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A :amaa asaca¢aasasa:=saa:ssa ac aeassa cac==x caaxzc=s==cxa-ax==__=x=_=a=a=acss=saxEaa=ccx= SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the resolution ordering the sale of City property. CITY OF TIGARD. OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM k: p� DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Business Tax Ordinance Review REQUESTED BY: Jerri Widner DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY Memorandum attached regarding business tax ordinance review. ===aczzzacacszaa:acsaacs:sscaascs=aaazcxx_.xazaxx=x-=zx=c=c=x==x==xxxcaccsaxa:=x.a=zcxc ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED N/A aasassssaacassaasasasassassaaaszaa=sxoaac xcxc=xx=x==xcs==ax==azc cxccc sa caaazc=zcsa i SUGGESTED ACTION N;A M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 28, 1983 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jerri L. Widner, Finance Director SUBJECT: REVIEW BUSINESS TAX ORDINANCE DISCUSSION: In 1982, the Business Tax Ordinance (82-73) was enacted by the City Council to replace the previous business license codes. f It is my understanding that the Budget Committee and City Council expected the Business Tax Ordinance to bring in enough revenue to support the program. Therefore, the tax ordinance included a new rate structure for businesses. } The new ordinance has caused various comments from the business community, most of which have been negative. (A copy of the letter from Fire Extinguisher Service Center is attached as an example). i The controversy concerns the fee structure for all businesses, but most vocal have been contractors and subcontractors whose business locations are outside the City. The new rate structure appears to be disproportionate in its application. i Small business owners are paying the same fee as large businesses. A residential building contractor whose place of business is outside the City limits does not fit within any of the rate structure categories as defined in the ordinance. One small business said he was unable to pay for Chamber dues and the business tax, so is dropping his Chamber membership. i ALTERNATIVES: 1. City Council direct staff to review the rate structure of the Business Tax a Ordinance. This review would include a survey of other cities' business tax R rates, recommendations from the business tax committee of the City and an t alternative rate structure. 2. Continue with the present rate structure. s E JLW:ms(0039F) i i F k e 't ® FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE CENTER 12705 SOUTHWEST BEAVERDAM ROAD— SUITE F- P. O. BOX 1391 - BEAVERTON, OREGON 97005 - (503)643-3309 7/25/83 SAFETY FIRST ppODUCTS :lb9� City Council City of Tigard 12755 Ash St. Tigard, OR 97223Cisn�al _MAM W1.4 PYRO CHEM. INC. Gentlemen: This letter is in reference to your current business tax receipts assessments. Fire Extinguisher Service Center serves the fire appliance and safety needs of commerce and industry. We serve the branch facilities of in the state many national concerns doing business ate of Oregon. Some of these are located in the city of Tigard. Among them are such accounts as Safeway Stores, Oregon Bank, General Telephone, National Bank, and various restaurant chains. We also serve some local accounts not the least of which is the City of Tigard. doing business with the public have the All employers and persons burden of complying with certain requirements as administered by the of Tigard through its department of safety. The burden of res- Cityeen ponding to equirement ha uireeninguisher Servisthose responsible xt Service Center. for compliant Our service is not as a vendor delivering merchandise for resale, yet it is more in the nature of a delivery of a product than the conduct of a business. Do you make this same as aga' delivers bread to your stores? or produce man? or delivery who del company ? ? Does Lan endorf truck? or shipper? or meat vendor?. or candy man? assessment in Bakery in Portland, home oiniorder toce in asell�bread there? Tigard or any other city, home thir tax eir In fact, do not these vendors Piiecommoditiesstoeconcernshlicensed place of business and merely dever to do business in your jurisdiction? resales against these vendors ours subject is a service not even i _ In the past Fire Extinguisher Service Center has been glad to pay a f reasonable assessment to the City of Tigard of about $36.00 annually, However your current annual fee based on our revenue from Tigard is prohibitive. Our records indicate that, within your jurisdiction our annual dollar volumne is less than $1,500 gross volumne. The net is substantially less. To compensate for an assessment increase is impossible. We cannot justify at price adjustment just within your jurisdiction to intrastate concerns because of your taxing practices. Nor, can we hardly afford to provide our service there at your current charge of $100.00. By contrast our dollar volumne is the City of Portland exceeds $50,000 annually yet our combined license and income tax is less than $300.00. We believe you have created a hardship for service companies serving businesses in the City of Tigard and ask that you do as Phagen did in "Oliver" and review the situation. Si cerely, i� Jresident ye S. Flagg a j;'s } i i i l 3 r i i i ZOO , METR®PUY.UAN SERVICE DISTRICT �1� providing Zoo,Transportation, Solid Waste and A i other Regional Services METRO Rick Gustafson July 26 , 1983 Executire Ofter Metro Council Cindy Barter Presiding cn Distru t Bob Oleson Dear Elected official: Depu!y Presiding Dis11 Metro is pleased to serve as host of the next Washington Richard Waker County Elected officials Caucus on Thursday, August 18, District 1983, at 7 :30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the CharheWilbamson Community Room on the Rock Creek Campus of Portland Districts Community College, 17705 N. W. Springville Road, Corky KirkpatrickPortland. The Washington County legislative delegation District 4 will be reporting on the likely impacts of the 19 83 Jack Deines ;dative session on local governments. District 5 leg— George Van Bergen District If there are additional items which you would like o se placed on the agenda, please contact Metro Local Sh rro Ke�ey Go ent Assist nt Phillip Fell at 221-1646 by August 10 . District Ernie Bonner District 8 Cord 1 l ly,, Bruce Ettinger District 10 Marge Kafoury District 11 Rick Gustaf on Garyriansen Executive officer District 12 RG/PF/gl 9082E/D3 527 5W Hall St. Portland,OR 97201 5031221-1646 t.. August 4, 1983 FROM: Neighborhood Planning Organization Number Three TO: Tigard City Council SUBJECT: Omissions in the Comprehensive Plan--Transportation While preparing for our letter to you dated July 18, 1983, concerning Tigard's testimony in the county transportation plan, I searched through our recently adopted comprehensive plan to find the strong language that you adopted in opposition to a possible extension of Murray Blvd. to Gaarde. I found narrative in the transportation plan about a series of indirect connections instead of a direct connection, and Policy 11.3.2 says that the extension of Murray to Pacific Highway should be west of Bull Mountain. But the language limiting Tigard's proposed collectors (Node #1 and Node #4 on the Map) is not in the plan. Remembering that this language was proposed by Councilor Tom Brian as part of the ordinance adopting the transportation plan, I reviewed the minutes of that night, January 25, 1983• The printed minutes (page 4, attached) state: "Motion by Councilor Brian to remove the top node #1 from the map and specify that a connection to Murray Blvd. is not to be made and take action to encourage a westerly bypass, keep node #4 (on map) and specify as minor collector and designed so as to discourage anit other use." Not being satisfied, Ilistened to the tape recording of the session. On Tape #3, Side #5, the motion by Councilor Tom Brian was as follows: At footage 390 of the tape: Remove the northerly node, the top node of #1, and (at footage 423) specify the remaining lower Node #1 as a minor collector. And at footage 400-428: "regarding Node #4, specify it as a minor collector designed to discourage its use as a major collector or arterial." At footage -453 of the tape, the Council directed that the legend of the map needed to be modified to reflect these changes. I am confident that City Administrator Bob Jean and his staff, both in the Recorder's office and in the Planning Department, did not deliberately disregard the directions given by the Council in the motion for Ordinance 84-04. Surely the severe time constraints and heavy work load caused these items to be neglected by a staff which has produce& so much in so short a time. However, these important items have been omitted from the Comprehen- sive Plan, and surely the Council will wish to restore them, both in order to maintain its committment to the citizens and to establish its strong position on these planning issues. Oui suggestion is that the legend of the transportation asap be modified to note these limitations, and that the ?imitations for Node #4 be included as a policy statement in 11.3--Special Concerns in NPO #3 area. Nodes #1 and #4 should be included in the list of minor collectors in the transportation Page, 2--NPO #3 to City Council re Transportation Comp Plan Omissions plan. We suggest that the Council request corrections to be made by ordinance. We are requesting the City Administrator to place these items on the agenda for council consideration. Thank you for your consideration, J J I Neighborhood Planning Orgainzation #3 Bob Bledsoe, Chairman cc. Bob Jean, City Administrator Bill Monahan, Planning Director Doris Bartig, City Recorder i i f i Approved by unanimous vote of Council present o Motion by Councilor Brian to remove the t.op node 91 from the map and be and ake ot to specify that a connection to Murray d kis n node 04 (one t map) end action to encourage a westerly bypass specify as minor collector and designed so as to discourage any other use. notion seconded by Councilor Scott. Motion carried by 3-1 majority vote Councilor Scheckla voting "nay". Councilor Brian clarified motion to state the map legend #I & •4 should be changed. wly o Council then discussed the issue of property; Durhamds for Road andthe developed properties and existing prop designation as a major collector street. to add to o Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Counciloarrt of cits •Development bottom of page 13 -The City shall provide. as p Code, for an exceptions process to the above standards . upon consideration of the Transportation Policies of this plan." Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. j i allow less than standard widths under Intent of the motion is to certain conditions and can minimize impact on certain neighborhoods. o motion by Councilor Scheckla. seconded by Councilor Brian, to amend page 15: '12. Major Collectors:" deleted four lines referencing Durham Road. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Councilor Brian moved, Councilor Scott seconded, to add the following 5 items to page 23 regarding NPO•s: ••1. The City shall encourage the assumption of jurisdiction from Washington County of Durham Road between Hall Blvd. and Hwy 99W. ••2. Durham Road shall not be considered to be a major arterial route between the I-5 Freeway and Pacific Highway. '•3. Consideration of the use of Edy Road between I-5 and Par-ific Highway shall be encouraged. 1•4. Durham Road shall be improved to 2 moving lanes of traffic with provision for left turn movements. ••5. Through traffic on Durham Road in excess of 30,000 pounds gross vehicle weight shall be discouraged." Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. PACb 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 25 , 1983 August 4. 1983 FROM: Bob Bledsoe, Chairman NPO #3 TO: Tigard City Council I am sending this letter along with the letter from NPO #3 regarding the Murray Blvd. Extension, because this letter addresses the same type of error and the corrections could be handled together. Our concern in this item is not nearly as great as with the Murray Blvd. Extension. Correcting these errors would help in the density requirement, and maybe be the balancing item to prevent having the plan rejected by LCDC. In the motions to adopt the Land Use Designation Map, certain C--P zoned areas in NPO #3 and in NPO #4 were allowed Medium-High and High Density Residences as outright permitted uses. These provisions were omitted from the ordinance, and from the plan. The motions were made in the meeting of March 14, 1983 (printed minutes attached). I listened to the tape recording and the printed minutes correspond exactly for- the Tigard Triangle C-P zone (footage 152 of Tape 3, Side 5). However the printed minutes use the word "or" in reference to allowing Medium-High Density in the C-P area between Beef Bend Road and Bull Mountain Road, which is ambiguous according to Planning Director Bill Monahan. The tape recording is as follows from Tape 3, Side 5: Footage 51-61 by Councilor Tom Brian: "As an outside consideration, I would not object to having medium-high density as a ???(word sounds like mobile)??? use under the C-P zone on that property. Ithink that preserves the owner's rights to develop as commercial professional if they want to; or apartments, you know--so it helps us in our density situation." Footage 92-98 clarification by Councilor Tom Brian "(Number) Three would be--there is an existing C-P now (commercial professional). We're keeping it that way, except for allowing Medium-High as a permitted use . . . (Question from the audience) .from Beef Bend to Bull Mountain on the frontage road." I suggest that the map be modified with a small legend concerning these two places, and/or that these items be included in the special areas of concern, and/or that these allowed uses in these two areas be specified explicitly in the section that defines permitted uses in a C-P zone. I hope these suggestions are of help to you. Bob Bledsoe, Chairman NPO #3 cc. Bill Monahan, Planning Director Doris Hartig, City Recorder Vittz Ramsdell 11635 Terrace Trails , addressed Bechtold property density and traftic issues. Ralph Flowers 11700 S.W. Gaarde, spoke to Bechtold Annexation and expresses support of low density issue. r Discussion by Council regarding testimony followed. Councilor Scheckla favored low density for Bechtold property on Walnut Avenue. Council suggested medium high permit use or C.P. zone on Beef-Bend property. Associate Planner Newton pointed out and marked areas on map and made a part of this record, marked Exhibit "A". i Motion by Councilor Cook the 4 changes as discussed be made as outlined on the map with respect to NPO 463. Councilor Brian seconded the motion_. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. i. 3 NPO 464 Attorney Sullivan, returned to the meeting and reviewed the proposed statement that represents a consensus of property owners. Council discussed the specifics and intent of the motion as well as the impact on proposed development. (t,) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian, that the Plan Map designations for NPO #4 recommended to Council by the Planning s.`.. Commission be approved and, in addition the 3 other changes shown on ?; the map, marked as Exhibit "A": , be adopted by Council. The following additional policies are also adopted for the development in NPO 464 specified below. ji "l. In the Tigard Triangle (i.e. that area bounded by Pacific Highway, Highway 217, and the Interest 5-Freeway), in those All. parcels designated "CP", High Density Residential Development '.•#i ; (i.e. 20 to 40 units per acre) shall be a use allowed outright in conjunction with commercial professional uses. "2. In the Tigard Triangle described above, those parcels designated for any (3) Commercial development shall not develop for such use, if not already so developed, unless a the area on Pacific Highway at major collector, connecting approximately 78th Avenue and the Westerly portion of Baines •�f�1�c_ P P Y " r Road Interchange at Interstate Freeway (at approximately 69th ? at Dartmouth) be constructed, be guaranteed within one year ;i�• for construction by a public agency, or be approved for construction as a part of a local improvement district after the remonstrance and review period have expired. This condition shall not apply to parcel -; having direct access to ;. Pacific Highway, or the InterstaL,.: 5 Freeway access ramps unless the portion proposed for development ir greater than 1000' from the right-of--way line of Pacific Highway or Interstate 5 Interchange ramps. COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 14, 1983 (l; iY „ i ; _rel'\U PL/-,i NH1.,G JGPZ August 2, 1983 FROM: Bob Bledsoe, Chairman of Neighborhood Planning Organization #3 TO: Tigard Planning Commission and Tigard City Council SUBJECT: Nomination of Milt Fyre to the Planning Commission The members of NPO #3 unanimously recommend to you Milt Fyre for the vacant position on the Planning Commission. Our only regret will be the loss of his participation in our deliberations. Milt has been one of the most regular in attendance at NPO #3 meetings, and he has been prompt and thorough in his duties as Secretary this year. NPO #3 has taken special interest in the concerns of the homeowner in Tigard, and we are confident that Milt will represent this viewpoint on the Planning Commission. On the other hana, his professional experience with Bonneville Power Administration serves to make him sensitive to economic and business ccnsiderati:ons in planning decisions. We feel he will be a valuable. addItIon to the Planning Commission, as have former members of the various neighborhood planning organizations. Respectfully submitted, Bob Bledsoe Chairman, NPO #3 TIGARD COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES ` ANNUAL SERVICE REPORT � =J 1982-1983 i . Number of Youth Referred This Year 400 Re-referrals : 26 'JUL 2 1983 TOTAL: 426 2. Living Status : 177 Both Parents 420 21 Father 5% 58 Mother/Stepfather14% 8 Relatives 2% 28 Father/Stepmother 7% Unknown 113 Mother- 270 12 Independent 30 9 Other (Specify) 2% School Status : 357Fu11-Time 84% —3_ Suspended 01% _____._Unknown __ 2Part-Time 01% __3_ExpelIed 01% 25Discontinued 5% __.5__High School Grad- 01% 16Irreciular Attendance 40 14 GED 2% Sex : 253 IMa 1 e 59% 173 Fema 1 e 410 5. Ethnict�y: 4_08 �Phite 96% 1 Native American •001% 7 Hispanic 1% --4--Black 01% 3 Asian 01% 3 Other 01% 5. Prior Court Contact: 149 Yes 35 277 No 65% 7. Residence: 297 Tigard 70% 105 Tualatin 25% 16 Other 4% Incorporated Unincorporated R. Source of Referral : 103 -chool 24% 113 parent 270 31 Self 7% 45 Juvenile Department ll% 6CSD 1% 102 Other Individual24% 22 Other Agency 5% 4Police 1% 9 Reason for Referral : 78Family Problems 18% Educational Assistance Activities/Recreation 16School Problems 4% 274 Employment 64% 10 Law Violation 2% 32Personal Problems8% 16 Drug/Alcohol Problems 4% 'Page* Two 54 Under 12 13% 83 16 19% 50 13 12% 58 17 14% 73 14 17% 23 18 5% 83 15 19% 2 Over 18 01% 71 . TCYS SERVICES PROVIDED THIS YEAR HOURS: HUMBER SERVED: 319.50 ( l) Individual Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 62.25 ( 2) Group Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 362.50 (3) Family Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 4.00 (4) Educational Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 25.75 (5) Drug Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 28 --- 49.00 (6) Alcohol Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 48 100.25 154 (8) :deeds Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S:RVICES: 1316 (7) L]TI-)loyment Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 666 (9) Job Placemnt-Kids for Hire. . . . . . . . . . . . 556 — - 230 (10) Job Placement- Permanent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 53 (11 ) Job Readiness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1161 (121 Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ry- ---- (13 ) Big Brother/Bi g Sister. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 (14 ) Support Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 12 1963,1 (15 ) On-Going Follow-Up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 69 (16 ) 3-Month Follow-Up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 (i7 ) Tutoring/GED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(18 ) Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 102 (19 ) Agency Coordination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 2 (20 ) Parent Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 , (21 } Community Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Specify) 41 (22) Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 12. Job Orders Received: Kids For Hire 647 188 Kids Applying for Work Permits Permanent: 231_ _57 Kids Applying for Social Security TOTAL : 878 Page Three t 13. Volunteers : 163 Active This Year 1431 Hours Donated 14. Big Sister/Brother Program: _76 Matched Pairs 91 Kids Pending 8 Volunteers Pending 15. Information/P,eferral Contacts : 4857Total Contacts Phone, Employment Related 4126 244 Youth 498 Phone 440 _ Information 353 Adults 106 Person 176 Referrals 16. Consultation Hours : 196.25 Program Consultation 192.25 Other Service Agencies 235.25 Non-Client Consultation 122 Training 244.50 Community Relations 4a_25 Miscellaneous t 17. Parent Education Program: # In Group # Sessions Service Units Pre-STEP STEP Stress Management Communication/Adolescent 4 3 12 Self-Esteem — t Single Parents 10 8 80 Step Parents 8/10 2/8 16/80 Adolescent Sexuality Works1hops i -1a?er Fap��xeui 6 3 9 R nom,-th 3 8 12 96 TOTALS: _ 4fi 3& 293- r TIGARD COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES �~ MONTHLY SERVICE REPORT J ULVL17UJ � Number of Youth Referred This Month: 76 Re-referral s : 2 = -- TOTAL.: 78 2. Living Status : JUL Z Q 1983 42 Both Parents 3 Father 12 Mother/Stepfather __Relatives 4 Father/Stepmother Unknown 13 Mother ,_Independent A--Other (Specifv) 3. School Status : 69 Full-Time Suspended —_____Unknown 1 Part-Time Expelled 4 Discontinued 1 High School Grad. Irregular Attendance _3 _GED Sex: 44_Male 24 Female 5. Ethni cid: 741-1hi to 1 Native American 1 —Hispanic 1 Black 1 Asian Other 6. Prior Court Contact: 25_Yes 43 No 7. Residence: 58 _Tigard 19 Tualatin _Other T ncorporated 1 Unincorporated R. Source of Referral : 10 School 21 Parent 8 Self 9 Juvenile Department 1 CSD 1 Other Individual 7 Other Agency 1 Police_ 9- Reason for Referral : 6 Family Problems Educational Assistance Activities/Recreation School Problems 68 Employment 1 Law Violation 2 Personal Problems 1 Drug/Alcohol Problems . MONTHLY REPORT Page Two 10. Age: 8 Under 12 8 16 6 13 11 17 14 14 1 18 26 15 _ Over 18 11 . TOYS SERVICES PROVIDES THIS MONTH: _HOIiRS: NUiiBER SERVED: 11.75 ( 1 ) Individual Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 _1 ( 2) Group Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _4 29 ( 3) Family Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _,61 (4) Educational Counseling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) Drug Counseling -.__-- (6) Alcohol Counseling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — -- 7.50 (3) Pdeeds `lzsessiricnt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8__ SERVICES 273 (7) E1-rn�loy:rent CoLmsel ing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 91 (g) Job Place.ent-Kids for Hire. . . . . . . . . . . . 85 _ - - 33 (10) Job Placement- Permanent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 — 3 (11 ) Job Readiness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 (12 ) Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- --- (13 ) Big Brother/Big Sister. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (14 ) Support Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.5(15 ) Or.-Going Follow-Up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 21 (16 ) 3-Month Folloar-Up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21— (17 ) Tutoring/GED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- -- (i3 ) Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - -- 6 (19 ) Agency Coordination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 {20 ) Parent Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21 ) Community Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --�_Spec f fy) 1 (22) Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 _ 12: Job Orders Received : Kids For Hire 97 _ ,_ Kids Applying for ''Work Permits Permanent: _3g_ 18 Kids Applying for Social Security TOTAL : _ MONTHLY REPORT Page Three 13. Volunte ., ; : 3 Active This Month 42 Hours Donated 14. Bich Sister/Brother Program: Matched Pairs Kids Pending Volunteers Pending 15. Information/Referral Contacts : 726 Total Contacts (640 Erriployment related phone calls) 10 Youth 16 Phone 15 Information 12 Adults 6 Person 7 Referrals 16. . Consul tat_i o lours : 8 P -)g. tm Consultation 11 Other Service Agencies 46 Non-Client Consultation 11 'Draining _12—_ Community Relations 2 Miscellaneous 17. Parent Education Program: P In Group N Sessions Service Units Pre-STEP STEP _ Stress Management Communication/Adolescent Self-Esteem Single Parents 10 8 80 Step Parents 10 10 100 Adolescent Sexuality Workshops 20 18 180 TOTALS: i i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON j COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 _ AGENDA ITEM If: { DATE SUBMITTED: August 1, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: Original Agreement I ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Assignment of between City and Amart Reimbursement Rights from Amart to REQUESTED BY: Amart Development AFC/ALI. -------------- f DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: / CITY ADMINISTRATOR: 4 i INFORMATION SUMMARY Amart Developmetn Corp. would like to ass,911 its rights to reimbursement on the Scholls Trunk Sewer to American Financial Corp. and American Life Insurance Co. as shown in the attached assignment document. City Attorney's Staff looked this over as to form. l =c=- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Do not allow assigment. (Do nothing) ------------------------------ -- ------------------ SUGGESTED ACTION Staff recommends that Council affirm the assignment of reimbursement rights and authorize the Mayor to sign the assignment document. ASSIGNMENT WHEREAS, ON June 1, 1980, Wedgewood Homes of Portland, Inc. , an Oregon corporation, Amart Development Ltd. , a limited partnership and the City of Tigard entered into an agreement wherein the City agreed to charge, collect and disburse certain sewer hook-up surcharges in order to reimburse Wedgewood Homes and Amart for the construction of a sewer trunk line known as the "Scholls Trunk Sewer," which agreement was amended on May 11, 1981, and WHEREAS, Amart Development Ltd. desires to assign its rights to said reimbursement, NOW, THEREFORE, for value received related to the withdrawal of American Guaranty Financial Corporation and American Guaranty Life Insurance Co. as limited partners, Amart Development Ltd. does hereby assign and transfer to American Guaranty Life Insurance Co. all of its rights and interest in and to to receive all disbursements said agreement, as amended including the right s hereafter from the City of Tigard according to the terms of said agreement, as amended. E i DATED THIS day of August, 1983. k i AMART DEVELOPMENT LTD. , a limited partnership t By LUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO. , neral Partner r 4 B — Y Ralph Hillier, President Receipt of a duplicate original of the above assignment is acknowledged this day of August, 1983. CITY OF TIGARD, A MUNICIPALITY of the State of Oregon By J?re�.d ASSIGNMENT WHEREAS, ON June 1, 1980, Wedgewood Homes of Portland, Inc. , an Oregon corporation, Amart Development Ltd. , a limited partnership and the City of Tigard entered into an agreement wherein the City agreed to charge, collect and disburse certain sewer hook-up surcharges in order to reimburse Wedgewood Homes and Amart for the construction of a sewer trunk line known as the "Scholls Trunk Sewer," which agreement was amended on May 11, 1981, and WHEREAS, Amart Development Ltd. desires to assign its rights to said reimbursement, NOW, THEREFORE, for value received related to the withdrawal of American Guaranty Financial Corporation and American Guaranty Life Insurance Co. as limited partners, Amart Development Ltd. does hereby assign and transfer to American Guaranty Life Insurance Co. all of its rights and interest in and to said agreement, as amended including the right to receive all disbursements hereafter from the City of Tigard according to the terms of said agreement, as amended. DATED THIS day of August, 1983. i AMART DEVELOPMENT LTD. , a limited partnership By LUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO. , General Partner By O ' Ralph E# Hillier, President Receipt of a duplicate original of the above assignment is acknowledged this day of August, 1983. CITY OF TIGARD, A MUNICIPALITY of the State of Oregon --74By // s pt-ea.ven� a-. i a i i f" CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: August 4 , 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: TURA FINANCIAL STAT04ENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1983-83 REQUESTED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY g Attached is the financial statement for the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency for fiscalY ear 1982-83. e e ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Receive and File ----- - - ------------------- SUGGESTED ACTION The statement is being submitted for your information. MEOW FINANCIAL STATEMENT TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY Pursuant to ORS 457.460, a financial statement for the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency (TURA) has been prepared. A copy of the statement is on file with the City of Tigard and TURA. The information contained in the statement is available to all interested citizens. 1982-83 totaled $19,939.88. During the Revenues received for fiscal year was expended for contractual services, fiscal year, $13,918.81 travel/subsistence expense and advertising. Cash carryover is $6,021.07. fiscal year 1983-84 are: taxes, $7,595; delinquent The estimated revenues for , $405: bond sale or short term note, $100,000; interest on investments, taxes, total resources, $110,250. Proposed expenditures for fiscal year $2,250;; contractual services, $14,398; bond or short term note interest, $3,602; capital outlay for improvements, $90,000; contingency, $2,250. F AML f i S 7 f 's e t i s s i. t i t { c r I{ 1 I{}{ f FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY Prepared Pursuant to ORS 457.460 July, 1983 1. The following taxing bodies levied taxes in the Tigard Urban Renewal Area within the City of Tigard during fiscal year 1982-83: Washington County $ 4.02 Washington County ESD •26 Portland Community College .57 Port of Portland .14 School District No. 23J 13.01 Tigard Water District .51 Unified Sewerage Agency .55 Tualatin RFPD 3.28 City of Tigard 1.12 Metro Service District .19 Metzger Water Combined .85 Metzger Water Indebt .05 TOTAL $24.55 2. These tax rates were calculated as follows: TAXING BODY TAX LEVY = MODIFIED ASSESSED VALUEl = TAX RATE Washington County $29,621,432 $7,368,515,500 $ 4.02 Washington County ESD 1,893,147 7,281,332,700 .26 Portland Comm. College 4,200,054 7,368,515,500 .57 Port of Portland 1,031,592 7,368,515,500 .14 School District No. 23J 17,867,025 1,373,330,100 13.01 Tigard Water District 365,651 716,963,700 .51 Unified Sewerage Agency 3,248,256 5,905,919,100 .55 Tualatin RFPD 4,623,306 1,409,544,500 3.28 City of Tigard 768,280 685,964,200 1.12 Metro Service District 1,277,638 6,724,408,500 .19 Metzger Water Combined 510,825 600,970,400 .85 Metzger Water Indebt 19,343 386,858,500 05 TOTAL 24.55 lExcludes increased assessed value, where applicable, of the Tigard, Tualatin and Beaverton Urban Renewal Areas. 3. The assessed value of property in the Tigard Urban Renewal Area increased from an adjusted base year of $41,415,000 when the area was formed, to $41,649,800 as of July 1, 1982. 4. In the 1982-83 fiscal year, the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency received $5,547.212 from taxes, calculated as follows: Increased Assessed Value in X Total Tax Rate = Tax Revenue Received Urban Renewal Area by Tigard Urban Renewal Agency Combined Tax Code 23-20 $23.65 23-21 $234,800 X 24.04 = $5,547.21 23-22 20.37 2 Actually received as of June 30, 1983 = $4,880.93. 5. The revenues received by TURA are used to repay indebtedness incurred in carrying out the Tigard Urban Renewal Plan. The outstanding obligations of the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency as of June 30, 1983, amounted to $7062.68. Because the urban renewal program was carried out during fiscal year 1982-83, the tax rates and proceeds for taxing bodies were affected as follows: Total Tax Rate Increases Tax Increment Rate Assigned to Proceeds Received TURA By TURA Washington County 4.02 Nil $ 944 Washington County ESD .26 Nil 61 Portland Community College .57 Nil 134 Port of Portland .14 Nil 33 School Dist. No. 231 13.01 .01 3,055 Tigard Water District .51 .01 127 Unified Sewerage Agency .55 Nil 129 Tualatin RFPD 3.28 Nil 770 City of Tigard 1.12 Nil 263 Metro Service District .19 Nil 45 Metzger Water Combined .85 Nil 3 Metzger Water Indebt .05 Nil -13 3 Metzger Water (Indebt and Combined) Lost Assessed Value within TURA $14,900). . TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY 6' FISCAL YEAR 1983-84 REVENUES $7,595 Taxes 405 Delinquent Taxes 100,000 Bond Sale/Short Term Note 2,250 Interest on Investments $110,250 i f EXPENDITURES E $14,398 I Contractual Services 3,602 Bond on Short Term Note Investment 90,000 Capital Outlay for Improvements 2,250 t Contingency $110,250 ' i (WAM:pm/0126P) f CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM fl: DATE SUBMITTED: August 1, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: On July 27, 1983 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: the- Council passed a resolution setting a public hearing. REQUESTED BY: Herb Morissette Builders, Inc. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 27, 1983 City Council set the public hearing on this matter for August 8, 1983. The Planning Department has received no written or verbal communication opposing the street vacation. SW 113th will be rededicated in an alignment to serve a proposed single family subdivision. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Deny the street vacation request. 2. Approve the street vacation. SUGGESTED ACTION l Adopt the Ordinance vacating SW 113th Avenue. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM i►: ��% /j i DATE SUBMITTED: August 1, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Cach Comprehensive Plan Amendement REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission t t 44 f DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINYSTRATOR: E i E Y INFORMATION SUMMARY i S On May 9, 1983, by Ordinance 83-24, the City Council adopted a low density plan i designation for the subject site. There are a total of 26 Multi-family units on the three lots. A low density plan designation is not appropriate for the parcels. i On June 21 , 1983, the Planning Commission recommended changing the plan designation as follows: Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lots 1200, 90000, 90001 , 90002, 90003, 90004, f 90005, 90006 and 90007 to the Medium High plan designation and Tax Map 2S1 2AB lot 1201 to the-medium plan designation. i s r i E t f ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED i 1. Change Plan designation on all lots to medium high s 2. Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation. 3. Deny the request. j SUGGESTED ACTION j i Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation. I E t Et E E4 �J. STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION June 21, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 10865 S.W. Walnut TIGARD, OREGON A. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. GENERAL INFORMATION CASE: CPA 4-83 NPO # 2 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from low density residential to medium high density residential. RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's analysis of applicable planning policies and existing land uses, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment from low density residential to medium high density residential. APPLICANT: Jerry Cach OWNER: Jerry Cach 12525 SW Main St. Marshall & Joanne Sunnarborg Tigard, Or. Jannette (Godwin) Wassenburg LOCATION: 9240 SW Center St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AB lots 1200, 1201, 90000, 90001, 90002, 90003, 90004, 90005, 90006, 90007) LOT AREA: 1.6 acres PRESENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential PRESENT ZONING DESIGNATION: R-7 NPO COMMENT: NPO # 2 is inactive at this time. PUBLIC NOTICES MAILED: 40 notices were mailed. No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. 2. BACKGROUND On May 9, 1983, by ordinance 83-24, the City Council adopted a low density residential plan designation for the subject site. The NPO # 2 Plan which was adopted by the City Council on February 24, 1975 designated the property as medium density. 3. VICINITY INFORMATION The surrounding land uses are as follows: The property to the north and west is developed as single family residential and is designated low density residential on the Comprehensive plan. The railroad tracks and the Pacific Highway viaduct border the property on the south. There are some professional offices across S.W. Center St. to the east of the site. 4. SITE INFORMATION There are a total of 26 multi-family units on the property. There are 16 units in the apartment complex on SW Commercial and 8 condominium units in the complex facing Center St.. In addition, there is a duplex on lot 1201. B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 2.1.1 The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. All owners of record within 250 feet were notified by mail of this application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times on June 9, 1983. 2.1.3 The City shall ensure that information on land use planning issues is available in an understandable form for all interested citizens. All interested parties are given a minimum of ten days to comment on all land use applications and are encouraged to do SO. Staff is available to answer any questions on applications or the application process. 12.1.1 The City shall provide for housing densities in accordance with: a. The applicable plan policies. b. The applicable locational criteria. C. The applicable community development code provisions. All applicable plan policies, locational criterias and Tigard Municipal Code provisions have been considered in review of this application. The locational criteria to be considered in determining a change to medium high density are as follows: Medium High and High Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. STAFF REPORT CPA 4-83 Page 2 (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. (3) Areas which have direct access from major collector or arterial streets. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. The property has already been developed to medium high density. There is a Tri-Met bus stop on Main Street, approximately two blocks from the subject site. In addition, the Main Street shopping facilities are within two blocks of the property. 2. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Comprehensive Plan Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard Municipal Code have been considered in review of this application. C. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets applicable planning policies. D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to medium high density, based on the following: 1. The property is already developed to medium high density standards. 2. The proposal conforms to existing plan policies and zoning code requirements. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: fr f AAq 10 Aem' A lAssidmW Eliza th A. Newton, sociate PlannerAiiam--A. Mon han, rector of Planning and Development STAFF REPORT CPA 4-83 Page 3 Phone: 639-4137 • REAL ESTATE & BUILDING SERVICE 12525 S. W. Main Street June 14, 1983 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard City Council City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Ore. 97223 Re: File No. CPA-4-83 Attn: Liz Newton The above property in question was, as you know, zoned Medium Nigh Density. It does not make sense to zone property to Low Density when doing so would bring an 18 unit, a 7 unit and a duplex into a nonconforming use. The owner's then would be faced with problems in obtaining financing to rebuild in case of fire or other damage or just to refinance. The property in question is close to everything and makes one of Tigard's better apartment sites. Sincerely, CASH'S RI,TY Gerald C. Cach GCC:kg i J� F. eaJit -4 ,�[..ty, Phone: 639-4137 REAL ESTATE Si BUILDING SERVICE 12529 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 May 18, 1983 City of Tigard 12755 SW Ash Tigard, Ore. 97223 Re: Block where 9240 S.W. Center is located or NW 4 NE Sec 2 T2S R1W W.M. ASA Block 64, North Tigardville Tax lots 1200, 1201, d 2S1 2AB Tax lots 90000, 90001, 900029 90003 , 90004, 90005, 90006 & 90007 If the Block is not zoned back to A-12 as it was only a short time ago, two properties would fit into a noncomforming use. Plans for two more units on another property would have to be scrapped. The property is contiguous to a major arterial and abutts Main St. and Commercial. It is next to a railroad track except for Commercial St. The property should be zoned for 20 units per acre because of above and its proximity or walking distance to shopping of all sorts. I am sure this is an error in transcription of maps. Thank you, CASH'S RILTY l Gerald C. Cach GCC:k$ �� enc. �_ (3) � /rte/-i o ,�iN�N�" 5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 4-83 Cash's Realty NPO # 2 A request to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from low to medium high density on property located at 9240 S.W. Center St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 21B lot 1200, 1201, 90000, 90001, 90002, 90003, 90004, 90005, 90006 and 90007. ) o Assocate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval. ' o Marshall Sunnarborg, 7670 S.W. Varnes, property owner of lot 1200, He supported the zone change, as the where an apartment exists. property was already developed at the medium high density. o Bob Hanson requested staff to explain the difference in the densities. He wanted to go on record opposing this zone change. o Van Dalton, 12110 SW 92nd, opposed the zone change, stating he was concerned that more apartments would be built on the property where the duplex exists. o Bruce Lindsey, 12130 SW 92nd, opposed the zone change, stating his concern being that the property value would decrease. CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTLE o Commissioner Edin requested staff review what the surrounding properties are zoned and what is currently constructed on the properties being proposed for rezoning. Discussion followed. Major 1201, with the duplex on it, could concern being that the tax lot have the duplex removed and build apartments. o Commissioner Moen questioned the possiblity of changing density to medium for lot 1201. Staff stated they had no problem with that 'UTT COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to recommend approval and forward to City Council of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 4-83 from low density to medium high density on all lots proposed except tax lot 1201, which would be changed from low density to medium density per staff's recommendations and findings. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: August 1 , 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Scheckla, Bissett, Breed Comprehensive Plan REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission Amendment DEPARTMENT BEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On May 9, 1983, the Tigard City Council designated the subject properties as low density residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map (ordinance 83-24) . On June 21 , 1983, the Planning Commission voted to recommend a change on the subject properties to medium density with a planned development overlay and a density range of 6 - 12 units per acre with the lower density along Picks Landing and the river and high density along Durham Road. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation. 2. Deny the request. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation . 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.3 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 21, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 10865 S.W. WALNUT, TIGARD, OREGON A. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Case: CPA 5-83 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) NPO #6 Request: To change the Comprehensive Plan designation from low to medium-high density. Recommendation: Based on staff's analysis and surrounding land uses, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment from low to medium-high density. Applicants: Lucy Scheckla Leonard Scheckla 10200 SW Durham Rd. 10200 SW Durham Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Marie Collier (Breed) Larry & Nancy Bissett P.O.. Box 83 2004 NW Irving St. Forest Grove, OR 97116 Portland, OR 97209 Owners: same as above Location: 10200 SW Durham, 10350 SW Durham, 16580 SW 108th and Durham and the lot west of 16580 SW Durham (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14B Tax Lots 500, 600, 601, 700 and 800) Lot Area: 41.16 acres Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential and Open Space (see attached map) NPO Comment: NPO #6 has not submitted any written comments on this application. Public Notices Mailed: 90 notices were mailed. No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. 2. BACKGROUND The subject properties were designated low density residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map by Tigard City Council Ordinance 83-24 on May 9, 1983. Staff, however, had recommended a medium-high density designation. The NPO #6 Plan, adopted by Ordinance 78-27 on April 24, 1978, designated the property as low density. Staff Report CPA 5-83 Page 2 3. VICINITY INFORMATION The surrounding land uses are as follows: Durham Road borders the property on the north. Across Durham Road to the north is the Summerfield development which is designated medium on the Comprehensive Plan. The property to the west is developed as single family and is designated medium-high adjacent to Durham Road and low adjacent to the Tualatin River (see attached map). The Tualatin River borders the property on the south. The property to the east is developed as single family residential and is designated low density on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. SITE INFORMATION There are existing single family homes and some out buildings on three of the 5 lots. Tax lot 800 is vacant and wooded with approximately 10% of the property in the 100-year floodplain of the Tualatin River. Portions of Tax lots 500 & 700 are also in the floodplain. The land slopes to the Tualatin River. The portion near the river is heavily wooded. The northern portion of the land is ( pasture land. B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. All owners of record within 250 feet were notified by mail of this application. A notice was published in the Tigard Times on June 9, 1983. In addition, NPO #6 was provided with an opportunity to review the application. ING 2.1.3 THE ISSUES CITY vIS SAV AVAILABLE IN ANNFINFORMATION UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR HALL INTERESTED CITIZENS. All interested parties are given a minimum of ten days to comment on all land use applications and are encouraged to do so. Staff is available to answer any questions on applications or the approval process. 3.5.3 THE CITY SHALL DESIGNATE THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OF FANNO CREEK, IT'S TRIBUTARIES, AND THE TUALATIN RIVER AS GREENWAY, WHICH WILL BE THE BACKBONE OF THE OPEN-SPACE SYSTEM. Staff Report CPA 5-83 Page 3 Portions of Tax Lots 500, 700 and 800 are designated open space on the Comprehensive Plan because the land lies within the 100-year floodplain. This application does not propose a change in the designation for floodplain land designated open space. 7.7.1 COMMUNITY LAND USE PLANNING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH PRIVATE UTILITY AGENCIES TO ASSURE THE AVAILABILITY OF SERVICES WHEN NEEDED. Private utilities such as gas, electricity and telephone service can be easily extended to serve this site. Picks Landing and Summerfield are currently served by private utilities. 12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH: a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. C. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS. All applicable plan policies, locational criteria and zoning code provisions were considered in review of this application. Locational criteria for medium-high and high density residential designations are as follows: Medium-Hi¢h and High Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. Staff Report CPA 5-83 Page 4 The property under consideration is not committed to low density development. The individual parcels are large enough to provide adequate buffer from adjoining single family residential development and still develop at the medium-high density. Tax lots 500, 600 and 601 have direct access onto Durham Road. There are no development limitations on the property. The floodplain area has been designated open space and will remain open space. Facilities can be extended to serve medium-high density development on the site. There is a Tri Met bus stop at 98th and SW Durham approximately 3 blocks from the site. There is a commercial center at Pacific Highway and 99W. 2. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Comprehensive Plan Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard Municipal Code will be applied to the development of the site. during Site Design Review. Included in the Design Review are prking, landscape, access and street improvements. C. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets applicable planning policies. The development of the site will be reviewed and approved through Site Design Review. D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the applicants' -equest for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment based on the following: 1. The proposal meets the locational criteria for determining areas of medium-high density residential. 2. The proposal meets applicable adopted Comprehensive Plan policies. 3. There is land designated medium-high density immediately west of the site which is similar in character to the subject property. Prepared by: lG Approved by;.-' i z Elir eth Ann Newt liam A. 'Monahan Associate Planner Director of Planning and Development pm (0051P) -.T s i iu t r- �' t ■� t�ll�r= Y me. Zw Ltd 6 r' ►►�1i'sa3q,►r ■�'� WIF - i r y: t J ,r.. ate. .... .:.. ..� :.'.. .._� ....--..:�: ......,.:.._.�_..�... _.... .. ... �.. ... .... ..... ... ..�.- ._.. -. _ �- .... --.. .... «• .,. -. ._ ....... JUN 9 1983 Lb Larry A. Bissett 2004 NW Irving St. CH Y OF T IGAKD Portland, OR 97209 PLANNING DEPT. June 8 , 1983 Mr . William A. Monahan Director of Planning and Development / Tigard City Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr . Monahan, Herewith enclosed is our application for amendment of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. We, along with several other property owners, were allowed by the City Council, to apply without fee, in order to allow further consideration of the future residential densities to be provided for in our area. Altogether , this area includes Tax Lots 500 (Scheckla) , 600 , r, 601 (Breed) , 700 (Scheckla) and 800 (Bissett) , as shown on the the tax map for the northwest 1/4 attached copy of a portion of of Section 14 , T2S-R1W, W.M. It contains over 40 acres and is bounded on the north by Durham Road; on the west by the west line of Section 14, on the south by the Tualatin River , and on the east by the Housing Development known as "Pick' s Landing" . This area is served by sewers which are stubbed off at Pick ' s Landing and also by the trunk sewer recently brought north of the Tualatin River just west of 108th. (We have access to 108th by way of- a 40-foot private road, over which we have an easement for road and utility purposes including sewers. ) The area is also well served by public transportation and main arterial streets. Durham Road intersects Pacific Highway (99W) approximately 1/2 mile from the area, and extends east to connect with I-5. Bus service is available at the intersection of Durham Road and Pacific Highway. As the Durham Road corridor develops into one of Tigard' s principal residential areas, public transit will undoubtedly be routed over its entire length. The area is close to both primary and secondary schools. Shopping is readily available at both the King City and Summerfield commercial districts. These districts include food markets and other retail shops, as well as a full range of financial and professional services including medical and i dental care. Mr . William A. Monahan June 8, 1983 Page Two The five tax lots, for which reconsideration of development densities is being requested, are almost totally devoid of pre-existing development. These are large tracts which offer the opportunity, especially if developed together , of providing a unique residential environment. A planned unit development utilizing direct access to the Tualatin River as a common recreation area could become one of Tigard' s truly outstanding residential areas. For such a prospect to become a reality, the low density classification which has been given to this area, must be changed to medium high density or at least medium density. The economic realities are that it is no longer possible to provide the amenities which we envision in the context of a large lot development. Large lots are no longer as desirable as they once were. People are more willing to share the outdoors in common with their neighbors, e.g. King City, Summerfield, Charbonneau to name just a few examples. These developments have been responsive to the needs of an increasingly larger segment of the population and they have shown that high density development does not mean low quality. Quite the reverse: as large lot developments, these projects could not have supported the extraordinary common amenities which they now provide. And the same thing is true for the larger community. it has been well documented that the cost per household of urban services rises rapidly as density decreases. These principles are also recognized in the Tigard Development Plan. Among the findings in the Housing Section of the Comprehensive Plan is the statement: "The rapid increase in housing and land cost over the last several years has excluded many house- holds from obtaining suitable housing to meet their needs. " One of the "implementation strategies" designed to reduce housing costs, states: "The City shall seek ways to minimize the cost of housing by encouraging a variety of home ownership alternatives, such as, but not limited to, townhouses and condominiums. " I Mr . William A. Monahan June 8, 1983 Page Three One of the principle policies of the public transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan is that: "That City shall encourage the expansion and use of public transit by locating land intensive uses in close proximity to transitways. " And this is further restated as an implementing strategy: "The City shall propose land use densities, within the Comprehensive Plan, along transit oriented corridors that support public transportation, service. " A basic policy of the Comprehensive Plan is that the housing densities shall be provided in accordance with applicable Locational Criteria. The residential Locational Criteria enumerated in the Comprehensive Plan specifically provides that low density residential should be restricted to, "Areas which are committed to low density development and not shown on the 'Buildable Land Inventory' as vacant land. " The area in question is vacant and listed on the Buildable Land Inventory. According to the Comprehensive Plan Locational Criteria, this area should not be designated for low density development. It meets or exceeds all of the Loc-itional Criteria for medium density residential and nearly all of the Criteria for medium high and high density residential. Ver tr y y s Larry A. Bissett LAB/pm cc: Marie Breed Leonard Scheckla Steve Janik P71 l 6 .Tune 6, 1483 Planning Department City of Tigard 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: I an respectfully reauesting that the recent zine change to Trow Den- sity on my property (tax lots 600 p- 601, 2S1 -14B, WM, Washington County) be reversed to Medium High Density as previously designated . am particularly opposed to Navin, "edium ?i ;)ensity or a 5 acre not even a street or trees parcel immediately on m�� Wesu border with low density t separaing the two parcels. it would be hard to justify expensive lots bordering this 5 acre parcel as well as Durham Road. It is my feeling that we need to use what little remaining lalotin Tigard as effectively as possible. The Satler property, Tax 36, Sec. 15, immediately on my West, myx parcels, Taxi lots andi60te, Sec. 14, and the Scheckla parcel , talot 500, S_ . , immeon my East, are contiguous parcels and are of the same character, at Least for the first 700 or 800 feet back. This plot of land would r be a natural designation for higher density use. We desperately need affordable housing in the Tigard area and 10,000 sa . ft. lots would not be affordable housing for the majority. There is a 25' to 301 barrier plus trees between the Picks Landing parcel and the kes a naturae break between low density Schleckla parcel and this ma and medium high density zoning. The people of Picks Landing are maintaining that to put higher den- sity next to them would lessen their investment. Ny property has been in my family since around 1915 and T have owned it personally investment in time, work, and for 23 years. I have a much lar'ger monetarily than any of the individuals in Picks Landing. I realize this is not a factor but this property ismy sole ssource y need tofhave income for my old age -- which is here-- and T pershis for its highest and best use . 1,ow density housing on property sold my parcels with medium high density bordering me with no bRoad from the West and Medium density (A-12) directly across Durham my land would not be the highest and best use, much less the most desirable use. The people of Picks Landing are opposed to a change in the atmosphere of the country side around themand like to see open fields and tall- trees. The trees in the back on mfr proDarty will have to come down irregardless of the density allowed because thev ar- over-ripe and their roots are shallow. They would constit-ut- an extreme danPPr if any were allowed to remain. 7 had hoped to keep some trees but have ' been advised against it. We all have to accept change. The people knew when they moved to Picks Landing that it was just a matter o time until this took place. }-lanning hept. page 2 .. • I sincerely feel that I have been put in the a,u,jLuaauion and have been�.. arbitrarily designated as the *break" between Picks banding, and Med- ium high density. I certainly feel that this is not onlyan ilgi cal break but also that it is extremely unfair to me. _ re- spectfully request that if you feel you cannot change my parcel (at least the front half) back to medium high density then certainly the low density designation should be extended through the Satler parcel , Tax lot 36, sec. 15, immediately on my West, to 108th. I would like to add that I was not at the original planning commission meetings because I was completely unaware they were taking place. I live in Gales Creek and do not get the papers in which the notices were said to have been placed. I moved from my Tigard home only be- cause I knew I had no dive. eTbut haveobeensell taxed offproperty the land .a1 ways loved in order to live. The county arbitrarily placed a P'25,0available as per acre assessment otvmv lana even though T do not have a sew I would appreciate any consideration you can give me . Thank you. You Y . ' y _ Marie geed (formerly Collier) June 14, 1983 r" Tigard Planning Commission File Number CPA 5-83 This letter is in response to the request filed by Lucy and Leonard Scheckla "et al" to change the density of SW 108th and SW Durham Road from low to medium high density. We were transferred to Tigard by my employer. This was my final move since I will shortly be retiring. It was with much excitement and due consideration we had when Sam Gotter Realtors helped us in selecting the just perfect location among those available in the area. The highest consideration for our property selection was never again to be confined to the "shoulder to shoulder" living of Southern California; with the shouting, arguing, loud radios, loud cars, all night parties. We bought in Pick' s Landing, adjacent to the Scheckla property, being assured that it was to be developed in the same manner and density as Pick' s. I have a State Vet loan - the only way I could afford the property - and have no further access to another loan, having been moved twice before by my employer. Pick' s Landing is a lovely, spacious, quiet neighborhood with natural trees, birds, etc. , ideal for raising a family, relaxing after a l stressful day at the office. The Schecklas now want to destroy this serenity by requesting a density from low to medium high. This is the third or fourth time we of Pick' s Landing have had to defend the original zoning of the property. The NPO at the previous hearing has provided sufficient evidence of other properties more acceptable to the higher density. Schecklas had the opportunity to request a change long before Pick's was developed, which would have given us homeowners a choice, i.e. of not putting our life savings into a house next to property that would be developed into non-owner occuppied dwellings. As it is we have no choice, we bought and invested in good faith that the Panning Commission was honest and sincere in permanently establishing the zoning as it was when we bought our house. It is granted that every issue has two sides. The Schecklas concern is over money, which soon will be dissipated. Our concern is of liveability, one of perpetual duration. Please vote to keep the existing low density on the property or a 400' buffer of low density housing. Yo rs truly, Lauren W. Ric an 16380 SW Sylvan Ct, Tigard, Or. 97223 JUS( 1719 3 GI I Y OF l IGARD PLANNING DEPT. /�Za•�,�rc_a /Lv_;/.2.,�e�a.e-�c-�t-� -2t_��et_•..�- Q�—e�-�.a ?t_c 4-�t�_�-�✓ /!l-v-�c, a-Gce ',e Xe �o Gam, O/UZ% A,� r` t lu OF I IUAKU July 1, 1983 PLANNING DEPT. Tigard City Council 12755 S . W. Ash Tigard , Oregon Dear Ladies and Gentlemen : As a Pick ' s Landing homeowner and citizen of Tigard , I have had sincere interest i'n achieving �ome(163757S .. Wo1Syl�antCtt}e re- i zoning of property due West of my I am pleased to see that a common accord appears to have been struck between Pick ' s Landing Homeowners and the Property Owners of the contested property . That is , that it will be zoned Medium Density(.PUD) with allowance for a ' buffer zone ' between Pick ' s Landing boundary line and any future property development. As you may already realize, many hours of debate have been spent by both sides to arrive at this consensus . What is most important now is that we mend our differences and live as good neighbors . While I ' d be the first one to vote that we put this case to the Ci rest, there ids one more uncertainty counselthasxadvisedothat noty Council . As I understand i-t, leg formal wording be put on record as. to what ' buffer zone ' next to Pick ' s Landing specifi'cally means . The potential problem I see is that by the time the land is actually developed , few will re- member the verbal interpretation of this zone-- as it has been described to me and my neighbors in previous meetings . Even with Medium Density zoning , there is still a possibility that a duplex or common wall dwelling will be erected next to the Pick ' s Landing property line . I wish to briefly state why a duplex or common wall struc- ture is of concern .. The reasons are purely economic . While I hope to reside i:n my present home for many years to come , I may at some time be forced to sell . Since my backyard has no natur- al barrier , a duplex would stand out like a sore thumb and nega- tively impact the value of my home. Therefore., I request that the City Council state that a 100 foot buffer zone next to Pick ' s Landing be single unit , detached fami:l y dwellings. This would be sincerely appreciated by those of us who have invested our savings in city property that we trust will be fairly zoned and buffered by the City Council . R, p ctfu y yours , Robert Worsley t, 10155 S.W. Jurgens Lane Sherwood, Oregon 198 July 7, 1983 TIG! R '?..A1,JI\!�a Tigard City Council 12755 S.W. Ashe Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: File No. CPA5-83 Scheckla Zoning Change Dear Tigard City Council : This letter is in response to the Scheckla request and the Tigard Planning Commission's recommendation to designate the Scheckla property located between Durhan Road and the Tualatin River as medium density property. My husband and I reside at 10155 S.W. Jurgens Lane, Sherwood, Oregon. This is on the Tualatin River and is directly across from the property in question. This letter represents not only my husband' s and my feelings, but the feelings of our neighbors: Mr. & Mrs. Rich Frost, Catherine Rife, and Mr. & Mrs. John Bohlen. We are the only residents located on Jurgens Lane. We oppose the Planning Commission's recommendation to change the comprehensive plan designation from low to medium density. The record of the June 21 , 1983, Tigard Planning Commission meeting will reflect that the recommendation to change the comprehensive plan designation on said prop- erty from low to medium density is only a compromise recommendation and is not appropriate to the character of the property. The Scheckla property is geographically located in a bowl upon the Tualatin River. It relates most appropriately and naturally to the land surrounding it on the east, Pick's Landing, and on the south (which is our property across the Tualatin River) . The property is rural in nature and is bordered by low density housing. The Tigard Planning Commission may easily designate such property on a map as medium density by relating it to the property located to the north, Summerfield, and to the west, Highway 99. When physically examining the property, one immediately realizes that such an association is inappropriate. The pastoral and rural character of the property more naturally relates to the southern and eastern properties. Medium density designation of the Scheckla property violates the comprehensive land use plan since the following factors are not satisfied: 1 . The Scheckla property is subject to development limitations such as flooding. Tigard City Council -2- July 7, 1983 i 2. The Scheckla property cannot be buffered from low density residential area to the east, Pick's Landing. 3. The Scheckla property has been committed to low density development. Lastly, the medium density designation of the Scheckla property is vigorously opposed by all interested parties. The only proponants for the medium density desig- nation were the applicants. All surrounding neighbors and interested parties were publicly opposed. Since the medium density designation of the Scheckla property is contrary to the natural "lay of the land", violates the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is vigor- ously opposed by all interested parties, we believe that the Tigard Planning Com- mission's recommendation should be rejected. The Scheckla property designation should remain low density. Sincerely, r• Debbie F. Craig �. DFC:bam 1 t Lewis ft Claris College June 20, 1983 To: Members of the Tigard Planning Commission From: Dan and Cheryl Duke Re: Zoning of Land Adjacent to Pick's Landing (File 7CPA 5-83) We are concerned that the land adjacent to Pick's Landing (on the western side of the development) may be re—zoned We decided to settle in Pick's Landing because we understood that it would not become crowded. We desired a place where our four children could experience a semi—rural existence, free of heavy traffic and general congestion. Had we known there was any possibility of the land bordering our property (16355 SW Sylvan Ct.) being zoned medium10 s high density, we would have located elsewhere. We recognize the validity of economic concerns as expressed by those with a stake in the property to the west of us. But we also feel there are other considerations besides economic gain. A great many families stand to be adversely affected by a change in the zoning pattern. We would hope that the pastoral nature of our neighborhood could be maintained by maintaining the zoning as low -temweikism density. In addition, we hope that the Tigard Planning Commission represents the interests of families and owners of single—unit dwellings as well as the interests of large landowners and developers. Respectfully submitted, Dbriel L. Duke Cheryl D. fluke 16355 SW Sylvan Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 Educational Administration Program _ Portland, Oregon 97219 Telephone 503 244-6161 COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to recommend approval and forward to City Council of Comprehens�'ve Plan Amendment CPA 4-83 from low density to medium high density on all lots proposed except tax lot 1201, which would be changed from low density to medium density per staff's recommendations and findings. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 5-83 SCHECKLA/BREED/BISSETT NPO # 6 A request to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from low to medium high density on the following properties: 10200 S.W. Durham, 10350 S.W. Durham and 16580 S.W. 108th and Durham Road. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14B tax lot 500, 600, 601 and 700) o Associate Planner Newton made staff 's recommendation for approval. o Phil Pasteris, NPO # 6 Chairperson raised several points opposing staff's recommendation, stating a petition had been submitted with approximately 80 signatures requesting property remain low density. o Bibianne Scheckla, representing applicant Lucy Scheckla, stated that they had never been informed of any NPO meetings, otherwise they would have been happy to attend. She continued by requesting the Planning Commission support the staff recommendation for approval of the Comprehensive Plan change to medium high stating the property meets all requirements to support the medium high density. o Marie Breed, applicant, stated she had not become aware of the changes proposed for her property until the end of April. She did not feel low density was the highest and best use for the property and that it was unfair to her as the property owner. o Larry Bissett, applicant, stated the reason the property should be designated medium or medium high as it is located close to schools and public services. They also have an easement to 108th which would eliminate having to increase traffic through existing residential areas. If the property is left low density it would not be consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. o Leonard Scheckla, applicant, stated he had owned his property for 42 years and requested the Planning Commissioner to designate the property for medium high density. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Debbie Craig, 10155 SW Jergens Lane, read and submitted a letter opposing the medium high density. o Greg Snyder, SW Riverwood Lane, representing property owners from Picks Landing, opposed the medium high density. They had purchased their property with the belief that the adjacent property would remain low density. PLANNING C0MMISSION1-1I2 MINUTES .lune 21 , 1983 Page 6 i o Penny Wills, _ SW Kent Place opposed changing the density from low. She also read a letter from Lauren Rickman and Daniel and Cheryl Duke opposing the medium high density and requesting it remain low density. CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTLE o Marie Breed, applicant, questioned being annexed into the City; staff responded at the time of development she would have to annex into the City. o Associate Planner Newton explained the Urban Granath Boundary and reviewed how the properties had been designated to low density. o Discussion followed regarding the NPO meeting, when they are held, how people are notified and who to contact. o Steve Petrazela, 9980 SW Riverwood, questioned how often could the applicant apply for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment ; staff responded twice a year is the only time the Planning Commission hears Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Discussion followed. o Discussion followed regarding the difference between low, medium and medium high density and the use of the planned development. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION o Commission Moen commented that he could identify with the Picks Landing group and did not support the change to medium high density. o Commissioner Edin did not feel item number two, regarding buffering, had been adequately addressed to determine if medium high density would be appropriate for this property. He did not support the low or the medium high density. For a smooth transition, medium density with a PD overlay would be more appropriate. o Commissioners Christen, Owens, Vanderwood preferred the -medium density with a planned development overlay. o Chairman Tepedino stated he would prefer the parties came to an agreement as no une can guarantee that a neighbors property will remain the same. o Commissioner Edin moved and Commissioner Christen seconded to modify Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 5-83 to reflect a medium density with a planned development overlay and recommend to City Council for approval. Based on public testimony and staff findings and recommendations a density of 6-12 units per acre is requested with the low density being along Picks Landing and the river, with higher densities along Durham. Motion carried by majority vote of the Commissioners present, Commissioner Moen voting no. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 21 , 1983 - Page 7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON l COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM #: UJ DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Dakota Greenway Condominium Comprehensive REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission Plan Amendment. DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On May 9, 1983, the Tigard City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan Map by Ordinance 83-24 which designates the property medium density. A portion of the property lies within the 100 year floodplain and is unbuildable. On July 19, 1983, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council change the designation on the property to the medium high density plan designation. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Retain the medium plan designation 2. Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation. SUGGESTED ACTION �` Adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation. i STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2 JULY 19, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARD ROOM 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. , Tigard, Oregon A. FINDINGS OF FACT CASE: CPA 6-83 Dakota Greenway Condominiums NPO #7. ZC 7-83 t REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density to Mediu% High Density and a zone change from A-12 to A-20 (Multi-Family Residential) on 6.38 acres of land. RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's review of the information submitted by the applicant, site inspection and analysis of the Interim Zoning Map and applicable play. policies, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend ` approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City ! Council and approve the zone change request. APPLICANT: Alpha Properties OWNER: same 17890 SW Boones Ferry Rd. Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 l LOCATION: 10485 SW North Dakc•--a (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DA Tax Lot No. 100) LOT AREA: 6.38 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density ZONE DESIGNATION: A-12 NPO COMMENT: No written comment had been received at the writing of this report. PUBLIC COMMENT: Notices were mailed to 12 surrounding property owners. No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. BACKGROUND/PREVIOUS ACTION: On February 26, 1979, the City Council adopted the NPO #7 Plan by Ordinance 79-11 which designated the property Urban Low Density. On May 9, 1983, the Tigard City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan Map by Ordinance 83-24 which designates the property Medium Density. VICINITY INFORMATION: The property to the south is developed as large lot single family residential. The property to the west is duplexes. The land to the north is vacant. Fanno Creek forms the no+-theast and east boundaries of the property. Staff Report CPA 6-83 ZC 7-83 Page 2 SITE INFORMATION: The property is vacant and slopes toward Fanno Creek. There are trees along the creek. The remainder of the site is field grass. B. APPLICABLE. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL. PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. All property owners within 250 feet of the property were notified of this application. In addition, a notice was published in the Tigard Times on July 7, 1983. NPO #7 was also notified of this application. 2.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS. All interested persons are given at least 10 days to offer written comments on all planning applications. Interested parties are also afforded an opportunity to speak at the public hearing on this matter. The planning staff is available to answer any questions on planning applications. 12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH: a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS. The applicant's prop Sal has been reviewed by staff for conformance to all Comprehensive Plan policies and Municipal Code provisions. The specific policies that pertain to the land use designation are found in the Locational Criteria, and are as follows: Medium-High and High Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. E (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. Staff Repot CPA 6-83 ZC 7-83 Page 3 (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (S) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. The Medium High Density development can be buffered from the Low Density development in the area. The property to the west is duplexes, to the north vacant and designated Medium Density. The creek to the east serves as a buffer from the industrial property further east. The property to the south is underdeveloped single family residential and is designated Medium Density on the Comprehensive Plan. The criteria for Medium and Medium High Density residential areas generally speak to the capacity of public facilities and services to serve the area given to its more intensive use. Sanitary sewer service is available from the Fanno Creek interceptor which runs through the property. Water service is available from the Tigard Water District line in SW North Dakota. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District Fire Marshall has reviewed the application for fire protection purposes and does not oppose increased density for this site. The property is served by SW North Dakota Street which will need to be improved to City standards prior to development. Police service, parks, library and general administrative services are available to the area. Tigard Municipal Code Comprehensive Plan Amendment - All of the requirements of the Tigard Municipal Code have been considered in review of this application. C. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment meets applicable planning policies. D. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Medium High Density, based on the following: The proposal conforms to existing plan policies and zoning code requirements. } Staff Report CPA 6-83 ZC 7-83 Page 4 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Should the Planning Commission vote to approve this application as presented by staff, the following motion may be made: Move to forward recommendation of approval of CPA 6-83 from Medium Density to Medium High Density plan designation to City Council and approval of ZC 7-83 from A-12 to A-20 zoning designation for the subject property. f PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: 's 1 Eliza th A. Newton v iam A. Monahan Associate Planner Director of Planning and Development t I l NOTE: Should the Planning Commission take action other than that recommended by staff, findings shall be adopted with the motion for decision. I F (EAN:pm/0107P) { 4 e t (4 1( 1 t� t { f i f i i i 1 t F Architects�..�ti Lom A.I.A 34 N.W. First St. Suite 30�!.�rtland. OR 97209 503/226-0590 I May 25, 1983 Flu J U"21 1983 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. SUPPORT DATA FOR COMPREIiENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT GE C ZONE CHANGE 4t _ Alpha Properties is proposing a condominium project consisting of 64 family units located within eight, two story wood-framed buildings. These eight buildings are to be located on 2.35 acres, which is above the flood plain. The remainder of the site, (4.03 acres below the flood plain) , will be devoted to open area, recreation such as a jogging path, bicycle pathway, and tennis courts (if permitted in the flood plain) . There will be 32 one bedroom units of approximately 550 sq. ft. each, and 32 two bedroom units i of approximately^?765 sq. ft. each. We -feel,:this IS. ari:1.deal 'si_te for,medi_um-high density housing because..of the amount 'of'"greenF4y.7_ adjacent to the site; the location of the parcel near the major highway collectors asowell as Washington Square; and mass, trans- portation within walking distance of the site. i If this site (total area 6.38 acres) were totally available for multifamily i use (A-12) , the site would house 76 units. Because two thirds of the site j S is below the flood plain, maximum unit count available to the site is now r 40 units (as computed per City of Tigard Policy 6.4.1),or 6.3 units per gross E r acre. We don't feel "that it is the intent of the City to reduce available housing in sites that are as appropriate for higher density housing as this one is. In our dealings with the City of Tigard, we know you are looking for opportunities to logically locate higher density housing which is appropriate, accessible, and will provide amenities for the people who may occupy these j housing developments. According to the Vacant Land Study written in 1978 by 1000 Friends of Oregon, the tri-county area has only 7.2% of vacant land zoned for multifamily. If all of the land which is zoned for multifamily were built to its maximum capacity (no deductions for flood plain, greenways, streets and dedications) , this would accommodate only 47% of the projected multifamily needs to the year 2000. What about the remaining 53%? We have developed a preliminary site plan of our proposed development to show how all housing can be located on the 2.35 acres above the flood plain. We wanted to establish building areas, parking and open space allocations. The 64 units would create an overall density of 10.03 units to the acre. Because of the configuration of the units, 8.7% of the site will be covered by build- ings, 13% by parking and the remaining 78.3% of the site will be open space, recreation and walks. We think this is an excellent relationship. Multi-unit projects are traditionally used as buffers between lower density housing and other uses, such as commercial. This project would be no exception as it would provide a buffer between single family neighborhoods and the manufacturing areas. The advantage to the potential tenants, however, is that they will have a very open site to enjoy--close to shopping, highways and mass transit. Because of the large amount of flood plain area within the site, we feel the site as designated is underzoned for its intended use. We are requesting the change of plan designation to medium-high density and zoning to A-20 to bring this site into the appropriate designation to more closely facilitate the intended A-12 Zone (78 unit count) . J ECTS VAN M A.I.A. t 'V M. Van m A.I.A. ect i z i k C .QUO 1 I t Jl D"o of n — { TIC.a9 j '� A - •� AA s — <rig 40 3 40 goo RIW W.M. is I3,4DA"', CANCELLED TAX LOTS 200,2100, 1/4 SECTION CORNER 89,50.,51"w 103.9 3830 r SEE MAP 100 IS I 356 6.38AC. C+;AIN -L,HPOSES LL_ 23 0 ,gmlp& 0 9-211 z GOV. LOT 3 N C. W+ E 3 I)o t S 5 4 60 THIS MAP IS FURNISHED AS A CONVENIENCE BY: 42 CHICAGO TITLE C) THIS MAP IS NOT A SURVEY AND DOES NOT 73 SHOW THE LOCATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. It 4200 THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ve 7 U, ANY ERRORS THEREIN. ,-�i 4300 i 7C K 0 TA NORTH LINE _JOHN �-STRE-E L. HICKLIN D.L.C. NO. 54 100 )o 3300 AC 3400 4.4 7A C, 10AC. ` s •,i s a 1 IV, ,1a s "rr 77 +' y ar 'itY``��.-iei� r�►.t.�-k�.t��a►tw��.��`'3�� `S73�d'�lt�v, "�� 7 �;,.� x:-iTi�£�-'^�-^ste>' y'�}a�'j!�'�`gK�� '•�v g4sY+� Src: a . -�k. ��f r=�SY��n � - Fv' ,'��{ra ti til !!44 � aFi'�'"f'•y`•� �,�.''7Y ��{ass �e,�„'�Y�i`�> _ .cbtttsy ' ra' `a n s � _ _ PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o President Tepedino requested staff to review public testimony and on Commissioners through the code. Thursday, walk the o Commissioner Owe s moVed and daCoxJulyi21� samer Moen seconded tover 1983 in the location the public Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. MPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 6 Condominiums 83 and ONCHANGEPO -8Dakota 5.2 CO ive Plan Amendment A request for a Comprehensfrom Medium Density to Medium High Density and a zone change from A-12 to A-20 (Multi-Family Residential) on 6.38 acres of x lot 100)Located: 10485 SW North Dakota (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34D to { endation for approval O Associate Planner Newton made staff's recomm with conditions. O Joe Van Lom, Architect, presented the applicant's presentation for approval. The proposed development would provide10.03nly be is to p acre with medium high r density,y, otherwise they y. They would have ( have 6 units per acre if it remains medium density. 78% open space and 13% for parking. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Mrs. Betty Cookson, 10520 SW North Dakota, opposed the zone charge. proposed Cookson, is across the street from her property and The propdevelopmentShe had she felt the development was to and close theyo had e recommended that two attended the NPO # 7 meeting building be removed, providing 48 unit versus 64 units. o Commissioner Butler asked why there was no school impact report ; staff explained, at issue is only a Comprehensive Plan Change and Zone Change, which does not require school imp pm . One would have to be submitted when the applicant proposed o Discussion followed regarding density transfer from the floodplain. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION O Commissioner Leverett supported staff's recommendation. O Commissioners Edin and Moen were not pursuaded this would be appropriate. he streets and ` ht O Commissioner Owens was lonarrer lots.n about tAlso, when he was a onNPOt#a7 the area was comprised o densit in this area. they had opposed medium high Y PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 19, 1983 Page 4 t o Commissioner_ Moen moved and Commissioner Edin seconded to deny CPA 6-83 and ZC 7-83 based on concerns that factors A 2, A S and A 7 of the determinants for designating property medium high density had not be adequately addressed. Motion failed three to four with Commissioners Tepedino, Christen, 't Leverett and Butler voting no. o Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Leverett seconded to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 6-83 from Medium Density to Medium High Density and approve Zone Change ZC 7-83 from A-12 to A-20 based on staff's findings and recommendations. Motion carried four to three, Commissioners Owens, &din and Moen voting no. S `t 1 2 f �k t t (i F {E S t { E i { i E t i e t f f t `F t ,9f3 s v O C r n ! , ail -�czL - o �t r G' J ] r TTp L _ is CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: None ISSUE`AGENDA TITLE: Gallo's Vinyard Comprehensive Plan REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission Amendment DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On July 19, 1983 the Planning commission approved a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City Council for a medium Comprehensive Plan designation to allow for construction of a single family subdivision at R-5 density. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request. R SUGGESTED ACTION 1 1- Approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission. t f `i I STAFF REPORT t. AGENDA ITEM 5.4 July 19, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARD ROOM 13137 S.W. Pacific Highway - Tigard, Or. A. FINDING OF FACT 1. General Information CASE: CPA 9-83 Gallo's Vinyard Comprehensive Plan Amendment ZC 8-83 Callo's Vinyard Zone Change S 7-83 Gallo's Vinyard subdivision NPO # 7 REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density to Medium Density Residential and for a zone change from R-7 (Single Family Residential) to R-5 (Single Family Residential). Also approval of a 22 lot Single Family residential Subdivision for 5,000 sq. ft. lots on 3.38 acres. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low ZONING DESIGNATION: R-7 RECOMMENDATION Based on staff's analysis of applicable planning policies, Municipal Code provisions, existing land uses and staff's field investigation, staff recommends approval of the applicant's request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density to Medium Density. In addition, staff recommends approving the zone change request from R-7 to R-5 and approval of the 22 lot subdivision. APPLICANT: Herb Morissette Builders OWNER: Same 7470 S.W. 76th Ave. Portland, Or. 97223 LOCATION: S.W. Tigard Street and S.W. 113th St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1Sl 34DC tax lot 2900)• LOT AREA: 3.38 Acres NPO COMMENT: No written comments had been received from the NPO at the writing of this report. F PUBLIC NOTICES MAILED 13 notices were mailed. No written comments had been received at the writing of this report. 2. Background t On June 23, 1978, the Planning Director approved a preliminary that T Bard for a 14 lot subdivision with conditions. On November 13, Planning Commission granted an extension of the preliminary plat approval an On April 27, 1981, the Tigard City Council approved a Comprehensive y , , the Revision from R-7 to R-5 for the subject property. designating the Tigard City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan Map gn g property low density and the Interim Zoning Map designating R-7. A public hearing has been set for August 8, 1983, to vacate SW 113th through the property. A realignment of SW 113th would be dedicated when the final plat is recorded. 3„ Vicinity Information The surrounding land uses are as follows: The land to the north is designated low density, zoned R-7 and developed as large lot single family residences. The property west of the site is developed as a single family subdivision at R-7 densities. To the south of the site is a single family residence on 5 acres. A portion of that land lies within the 100 year floodplain. The land east of the site is vacant and is owned by the Tigard School District. 4. Site information The site is vacant, slopes 4% to the south and is covered with native brush and grasses. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: 2.1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. Ab tices were sent to all property owners within 250 feet of this application. A notice was published in the Tigard Time on July # 7 has been notified of this 7, 1983. In addition, NPO application. USE PIA-NNING 2.1.3 ISSU SI S AVAILAs LE IN ANHUNDER UNDERSTANDABLE FORM FT INFORMATION ON OR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS. ( All interested pasties are given, at a minimum, 10 days to respond in writing to the application and request st under staff consideration and are encouraged to do so. The planning is available to address any specific questions concerning the application or the application process. STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83/ZC 8-83/S 7-83 - Page 2 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY OF 6.1.1 DENSITIES AND RESIDENTIAL TYPES R T PES AT VARIOUSPRICE RAND YR NT LEVELS• t The subdivision of this property will provide 22 additional single family building lots in Tigard available for ownership by individuals. CITY SHALL DIRECT ITS LAND USE ACTIONS THE 6.3.1 MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF ESTABLI HED RE IDENTIAL TOWARDAREASBY: a. DESIGNATING ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP THE "ESTABLISHED AREAS" COMMITTED TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA. WITHIN THE "ESTABLISHED AREAS" NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OF THE SAME TYPE AND DENSITY IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE CHARACTER OF EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE 6.3.2 IN THE TIGARD c A AESITY TRANSITION WHEREBY INCREASED RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES ARE ADJACENT TO ESTABLISHED AREAS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: a. THE DENSITY WITHIN 100 FEET OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SHALL NOT t EXCEED 25% OVER THE DENSITY SHOWN ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE ADJACENT LAND T RIS) iNERWE IS AN ICH CASETHISNING PROVISIAD ON (MAJOR COLLECTOR O SHALL NOT APPLY. AN XISTING HOUTS ING b WHERE THE MENT DEVELOPMENT, THEE HOUSINGOPTP S 7SHALL BE ECOMPATIBLE. SFOR EXAMPLE: 1. TWO HOUSING UNITS WHICH ARE ATTACHED ARE CONSIDERED COMPATIBLE WITH A DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY UNIT; BUT NOT 2. MORE THAN CONSIDERED�COMPATIBLE O HOUSING UNITS WITH A WHICHARE ATTACHED DDETACHED UNIT. 6.3.3 IN ALL PHASES OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS IN A RESIDENTIAL "ESTABLISHED AREA", A PRIMARY CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY SHALL BE TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OF THE ADJACENT ESTABLISHED AREAS. The site is within an established area and abuts single family homes. The applicant is proposing to constructe homes single famihe homes which will be of the same housing type as west. The applicant is proposing to construct 9 single family homes within 100 feet of the 8 existing single family homes, only a 13% increase in density. 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE SERVICE CAPACITY INCLUDING: STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83/ZC 8-83/S 7-83 - Page 3 1. PUBLIC WATER: 2. PUBLIC SEWER (NEW DEVELOPMENT ON SEPTIC TANKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY) ; AND 3. STORM DRAINAGE b. THE FACILITIES ARE: 1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: AND 2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS. C. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACE UNDERGROUND. The applicant is proposing to install public facilities in accordance with planning policies and city ordinances. 7.4.4 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT BE CONNECTED TO A SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. The applicant proposed to connect to an 8" public sewer line just south of the property. 7.6.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT THAT: a. THE DEVELOPMENT BE SERVED BY A WATER SYSTEM HAVING ADEQUATE WATER PRESSURE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES; E t b. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT REDUCE THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE AREAS BELOW A LEVEL ADEQUATE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES: AND C. THE APPLICABLE FIRE DISTRICT REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS. t The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has reviewed the project and approved it as acceptable for fire protection and access purposes. i 8.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL i AUTHORITY; b. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH; F C. THE DEVELOPED. COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO CITY STANDARDS WITHIN THE } DEVELOPMENT; d• INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF 6 EXISTING STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT OF THE E DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACTS; s STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83/ZC 8-83/S -7-83 - Page 4. t` S.W. Tigard Street has not been improved to city standards. In addition, additional right-of-way may be required. 12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH: a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. C. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS. All applicable plan policies, locational criterias and Tigard Municipal Code provisions have been considered in review of this application. The locational criteria to be considered in determining a change to medium density are as follows: 2. Medium Density Residential A. The following factors will be determinants of the areas designated for medium density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which have direct access from collector or arterial streets. i (3) Areas which are not subject to development limitations such as topography, flooding, poor drainage. r (4) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (5) Areas within one half of a mile of public transportation. (6) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. B. The following factors will be determinants of density ranges allowed through zoning in the medium density planned area: (1) The density of development in areas historically zoned for medium density development. (2) The topography and natural features of the areas and the degree of possible buffering from established low density residential areas. (3) The capacity of the services. (4) The distance to the public transit. STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83JZC 8-83/ S 7-83 - Page 5 i (5) The distance to neighborhood or general commercial centers and office business centers. (6) The distance from public open space. The property has access to a collector street. There are no development limitations on the property. Public facilities to the site are more than adequate to serve the applicant's proposed development. There is public transit on SW Walnut, SW 121st and SW Greenburg Road. The Tigard School District owns the property east of the site which is presently vacant but is a potential school site which will provide additional open space and recreation. I Zoning District Map The proposed zoning district change is consistent with the Comprehensive 1 Plan designation. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS: 17-060.065 Criteria of Approval. No preliminary plat for a proposed t subdivision and no map or major partition shall be approved unless the Planning Director finds: E (1) Streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivision or maps of major partitions already approved for i adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects, unless the City determines it to be in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern. (2) Streets and roads held for private use are clearly indicated on the tentative plan and all reservations or restrictions relating to such j private roads and streets are set forth thereon; i I (3) The preliminary plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan, the t applicable zoning regulations, and the regulations within this title; i (4) There will exist adequate quantity and quality of water and an adequate sewage disposal system to support the proposed uses of the i land described in the proposed plat. (Ord. 79-96 Exhibit A (part), { F 1979). 18.20.030 Lot R-5 Zone. In an R-5 zone the lot size shall be as follows: I. The minimum lot area shall be five thousand five hundred square feet, excepting for duplex use. STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83/ZC 8-83/S 7-83 - Page 6 STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff finds that the proposed Comprehensive Plan change and Zone Change conform to applicable planning policies. In addition, staff has reviewed the subdivision plat, conducted a field investigation and finds that the subdivision proposal meets code requirements. Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zone Change request and Subdivision as proposed by the applicant if the street vacation and rededication of SW 113th occurs. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Should the Planning Commission decide to approve the request as presented, the following motion may be made: "Move to forward recommendation of approval to the City Council for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment from low density to medium density, approval of the Zone Change to become effective upon Council approval of the Comprehensive P[lan Amendment and approval of the Subdivision proposal with conditions after the street vacation of SW 113th is approved." RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: The following conditions shall be attached to the Subdivision approval: 1. The sidewalk shall be located adjacent to curbs. 2. Full street improvements shall be required from Tigard Street southerly to terminus of the plat (south boundary line). 3. Full half street improvements shall be required on Tigard Street. 4. A temporary, hard surface, turn-around shall be provided at the end of the new roadway (113th Ave.); If no further development is anticipated to the south, then said turn-around should be a standard cul-de-sac. Provisions shall be made for access to Tax Lot 300 to the south of the property. 5. Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a registered civil engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the City's Engineering Division for review. 6. Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence until after the Engineering Division has issued approved public improvement plans (the Division will require posting of a 100% performance bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign installation/streetlight deposit and also, the execution of a street opening permit or construction compliance agreement) just prior to, or at the time of, it's issuance of approved public improvement plans. STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83/ZC 8-83/S 7-83 - Page 7 7. No changes or modifications shall be made to approved pians without written approval from the appropriate City department. 8. No Building Permit shall be issued until 14 days after Planning Commission approval. SURVEY CONDITIONS: 1. Basis of bearings to the County Survey 20.267 (Center line survey of S.W. Tigard Street) 2. Dedication alignment on S.W. Tigard Street to conform to C.S. # 20.267 alignment. 3. Centerline monumentati.on required: P.I. 's of curves when there position falls inside pavement limits, Otherwise B.C. & E.C. Center line inter. @ 113th and Tigard shall be set. NOTE: All Center Line monuments shall be capped 5/8" x 30" I.R's in Mon. Box (Min. 6" opening) set at finish grade, or capped 5/8" x 30" I.R's set on surface of final lift. 4. "Recorded" mylar copy of final plat to be submitted to city within 15 days after recording. / LA.-- —�:Z .001d:W -7 �Zf -2,&�am Audhm PRE • 'Elizabeth' . Newton APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan Associate Planner Director of Planning and Development NOTE: Should the Planning Commission pass a motion other than that recommended by the staff, findings shall be adopted with the motion. STAFF REPORT CPA 9-83/ZC 8-83/S 7-83 Page 8 NS AMENDMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENTS SUPPORTING COMPREHE ZONE CHANGE 1> The density of development in areas historically zoned for medium density development. The ..hiis r.i.cal -;,zoning of, the sub ject property, ,presents an, interesting', r ; case� fir*tonszderation:.by� the Tigard Planning Commissie�n '� Prior o; the ^ option of the city's +new Comprehensave,�f an, Es'a1Yo's .* J .x 27 ,1982 . r, a = .Viiae ardr wasxza�sed :R 5zy actoei of he_e#tY�tt?uns31 , A r3,1 � = r . eea�e ,�lePf 8Y ,�SThepprval :allowedihe ?i3e (�e operto repla , r° petFYa�ui^��5400squatoest 3;ot� fonc�e purpoe' bei',sts= ctacic s§''.tcrot t�f �secsrwa ;ltsous3ngaviths 'ogle%famx'By�detacheEi'.tohe�vestfWl �ti� Ki'^ Av'.e` da .taicte'd rani tss to?'tt�eeast <se condi ti ona #t2a theaProaTl? . - '- t C :. v tet��f•frrepor..t pr-epared'4or-;"the pr 1981 he'ar:ing :indic�i ed �thias;. ®ul d al Z o�Ti `a' reasonable density. i ncrease and wduT d,:=no, .sers'oU, change• the character of the arez. The staff subsequently recommended � .l appra�raI sub ject-moo. 12- condi t s on s. -The enabling ordinance states s bw k =5Al 1 interested' persons_ were off orded.:anr_'opporturr=ty ;ftoKbe K �,�k ��. _ �aheard:,aV.,r_ s 'public`oliearing. Therefore,, tt-�e 'council atiiopts -the .following substantive finding. rz a7 That E--the porposed ;coni ng is- compatible with the surr7oundi'ng neighborhood, ,as determsreed by the v.Sgt ` C A f��dgard Pl�3nS71ng '�'.omm3.Ssiola x 'r'5'',i I Pit t -' oR '` t'f'�'��he��i'��Q. F►t'��ec�5 �. •• was „�F ...r'[r, ..y�.F .nth x• 6 .G sYf - Y:, - .aa ,'�.r+.. irN .s'. .. � :�• ._.. y� ' Fx.aa s, ^ �y.y-a x _. ��6'�kTS+Y Gs°t k ;'$S�'r sin ` eo l Based on the :R �{, crns`ng !wi t A } Z f nsi� p4"o+✓ec9 by tnc� G$t.Zv;' �n the"'spr'� �� *HeC else of�:' soaa tonosraxondations; the appl= pant 'diecaded tcl` c3elay p •. ;:. eV ep 3 . In_ December 1982 the-applicant, Herb Morissette, requested Alpha Engineering, Ina- 'with proceed with the _project. On December• 1S, 1982 Hans �Jatheuer and." Car-1,- Jensen of Alpha-Engineering, Inc. ; met eraith F3ill i Monahan and -Li z Newtons, :Tigard P1 ann i ng ,Staff, to' discuss -the status of approval.s. :. Staff stated that the preliminary plat appretval jihad_ lapsed arid'r_that the 'street petition required for developmect _cif :the - „ r, y pr-oper.tyt:as �01anned was,:•not valid. .Moreover, Alpha;Engineer tag, Inc. +<.di�ecovered Ka t-the :city was in the :process of adopt-ing -a netm�� a. Campr=Shensi ye rRl an .The �tiew •Comprehensive ,Plast: ,indicated' that the property would="be :boned a:p R-7. AZpha::•Erigineers.ng,.-, Ina..x requested the plan to?be A evi sed f;-5;Ri n accordance- with the` previous approval . Alpha Engineering, cvas .advised that this change..would be made. #�f-terw-A. , meeki3sg Alp a r£ri.gineer-i:ng, Irico�:coistacted Herb �'9orx ssette :advi sed=hf eiT on: ,thestatais ,o,f hi s --approval S. Herta i ndi ca_teci at tie oras unawar=e that the p1Aition.•.was invalid. After some discussion` with ' staff., Herb obtained a new petition to. vacate SUI 113th Ave. and proceeded to obtain the required signatures. • 1• C:ij: Paget Supplemental Statements On June 7, 19a3, Alpha Engineering, Inc. contacted Liz Newton to determine the status of the petition and obtain information for filing a new request for preliminary plat approval . During that conversation Alpha Engineering, Inc. was advised that the property was zoned R. 7 not R-5 as requested last December. In response to staffs inquiry as to why Alpha Engineer`i.ng, Inc. or Herb Morissette did not verify the R-5 zoning on the property before this date, the applicant can only say he wrongly assumed that staff would proceed with' the earlier request or let 'him know why they could not proceed. Neither the applicant nor Alpha Engineering, Inc. heard from staff and, therefore, believed the change to R-5 zoning was properly handled during the meeting in December. Staff now advises that to proceed with development of the property as planned for single family detached residential units on 5000 square foot lots, he must first obtain approval of a Comprehensive Plan revision and zone change. Upon review of the area, the applicant finds that property on the east of Gallo' s Vineyard, Muttley' s Addition, is zoned R-7 with single family detached units on 7000 square foot lots. On 114th Place there _is. a. duplex. structure on the SE corner with SW Tigard St. and there is r �s+hat =aFpe r•s o be #ous^-�p ens ,on he W c r.-ne The s:upa.t $a,; h` 3 $ _rags .>a^_ axe "-".:y;• .,,. °+ ,laY�` ' •; 'fiy 'Er S° its a re €is °c�trren y a min. .an ctl€cisatiSIR 1 ype Ar dwell ing "a�rirtr an this area. The apr®perta'eta the north and south are generally single residents an 1 argue parcQl:s:z 'To the east of Gal l os's Vineyard is Tigard school property. Based on the above, the R-5 zoning for SFR lots is compatible with low density development in the area and will provide some density transition between the school property and adjacent developed properties. 2> The topography and natural features of the area and the degree of possible buffering from established low density residential areas. The property is currently fallow with grass covering most of the property and some brush along the property lines. There is no distinctive topography or natural feature that would inherently indicate a zoning of R-7 or R-5. Based on the proposed prelimineay plat we believe this development to be compatible with the surrounding area and will provide some transitional density increse between the school property and adjacent single family residential areas. I t Page. F Supplemental Statements 3) The capacity of the services. The capacity of existing public facilities is adequate to serve this -property. Water is available to the site by the 8" line in Tigard St. Sanitary sewer is available just to the south of the property. Storm water can be handled by the existing pipe located south of the site. ; Primary vehicular access is via SW Tigard St. which is .connected to Tiedeman St. Tiedeman St. connects to Greenburg Rd. which in turn connects to Highway 217. Public transportation is available on Est, Greenburg Rd. Tigard Schools have adequate capacity to handle the additional students expected from this development (see attached letter) . Police and fire protection will be supplied by the City of Tigard, and health - services by local medical clinics in Tigard and by Washington County health facilities. 4) The distance to the public transits. As indicated above, public transportation is provided on Greenburg Rd. This is slightly over one half mile easterly of the subject property. Based on conversations with Tri—Met, new routes are added as demand warrants -As,ydeyelopment rcpntYnues -iss,ti'►�S��p .Tri7,Met�z 1 'ad ' s hd'�°s e u e `tip `meet' �e public need. 5) The distance to neighborhood or general commercial centers and office business centers. The site is within one and one half miles of Washington Square and with two miles of downtown Tigard; consequently, the site provides excellent proximity to general commercial centers, office business centers, and minor industrial employment centers. 6) The distance from public open space. Public open space and recreational facilities are or will be provided by school site located just easterly of the site. Other public open space and recreational facilities are within three miles of the site. 5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 7-83 Commonwealth Realtors Group Inc. NPO # 5 o This item was set over to afford the applicant time to meet with the NPO # 5 and 6 on July 20, 1983. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 9-83 ZONE CHANGE ZC 8-83 SUBDIVISION S 7-83 Gallo's Vinyard/Herb Morissette Builders NPO # 7 A request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density to Medium Density Residential and Zone change from R-7 (Single Family Residential) to R-5 (Single Family Residential). Also approval of a 22 lot Single Family Residential Subdivision for 5,000 sq. ft. lots on 3.38 acres. Located: SW Tigard St. and S.W. 113th St. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DC lot 2900). o Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation for approval. o Hans J. Vatheuei, Alpha Engineers, 1750 S.W. Skyline, representing the applicant stated he was available to answer any questions. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTON o President Tepedino questioned the condition of SW Tigard St; Associate Planner Newton stated the street is scheduled for a overlay. Discussion followed regarding the condition of SW 113th and SW Tigard St. o Commissioner Owens questioned why there were survey conditions on the staff report; Associate Planner Newton explained this was being done at the request of the Public Works Director. o Commissioner Butler questioned why there was no School Impact report with the subdivision; Associate Planner stated there was one in the file and unless the Planning Commission requested a copy was not normally given to the Commissioners. o Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend approval to the City Council of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 9-83 and approve Zone Change ZC 8-83 and Subdivision S-7-83 per staff's recommendation and conditions. Also, correct the spelling of the word "there" to "their" in the survey conditions. - Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. i i -7 S 1 500 'o (C.S. No. 6747) el ° 526 .4c. O f � _ 8-7 r f . . 336.90 N 890 41* W 190.90 rn (C.S. NO.5301) 600 I i /.05 Ac. N = s N 0 � •f „ 2 W ~ N N 2 ® � v I = Z (C.S. No. 6747 (C.S. No. 5305) O N TS I 260.90 378.90 i S 89° 51' E 190.90 ' 9e.56 EAST N (C.S. No. 13.079) Co. Rd. No. 916 o e 3 8904 45"E 2552.04 N GA R0. 1 •• •• ... •� � 8899 75.09 19•I 72 72 ° -2 fV N"I"''18`W� 9304 Qr .0 . R-O S 89 45 3/4' E 4800 SO 4900 700 2900 I 2400 f a I J 07Ac. 2800 = 2/Ac. I` 3000 17 os 1 2 s I I _ 30 Ac. 2O 90 0 /6.53Ac. Ivy 8 36 '. 0 J. C. 103 Z I 26 ". N w 2` 4700 490! 1 2 —11512-16 111.13 I 11.2 12580 I SCHOOL 100 4600742 "7 f 5000 J12 1 15 D` I 3 & 25 a i 114 v� 118.03 '71 120 -J 5100 00 4500 CL -A24 24 ' 14 4�A zo � I 7 6 5 j I n9 ne.o3 �� 5200 '" m I8 1O0 $ 4400 $ 23 13 R 5 120 "' 3I 119 119.03 5300 4 1 00 4300 12 o i? 22 6 1 104.39 II8.03 � � 5400 1'39006'41"E 4200 Ar- .� ) a 21 7 120 1 -� 5500 118.03 4100 !� to20IPVi�, L P- 8IHtT1AL POIN5600 1 72 72'S IHl£ • Ih .12 69.91 w)ay 19 653.24 30 •,9 TR a S W r ) S. ) . 5x 40' 60 11499 5�`0 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON t COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8, 1983 AGENDA ITEM #: DATE SUBMITTED: July 29, 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Krueger Comprehensive Plan Amendment REQUESTED BY: Planning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: CITY ADMINISTRATOR: INFORMATION SUMMARY On June 23, 1983, the property was annexed to the City. On July 12, 1983, the Planning Commission passed a recommendation to place Comprehensive Plan designations on the property as follows: Tax Map 1S1 33C tax lots 100, 101 , 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 300, 301 , 600, 700, 900, 1000, 1300, 1301 , 1302 and Tax Map 2S1 4B portions of tax lots 100 and 101 to be designated Medium High density. Tax Map 2S1 4B a portion of tax lot 101 to be designated Medium and Tax Map 11S1 4B a portion of tax lot 100 to be designated Neighborhood Commercial. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Modify or deny the Planning Commission recommendation. / SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the' Plan designations as recommended by the Planning Commission. STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.4 JULY 12, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARD ROOM 13137 S.W. PACIFIC HWY. , TIGARD, OREGON A. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. General Information CASE: CPA 10-83 Krueger Comprehensive Plan Amendment ZC 2-83 Krueger Zone Change REQUEST: The City of Tigard is requesting Comprehensive Plan amendment from Washington County designation 0-24 units per acre to the City of Tigard designation Medium-High Density residential (13-20 units per acre) on approximately 90 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is A-20 (Multiple Family Residential) ; from Washington County designation 0-9 units per acre to City of Tigard designation Medium Density residential (6-12 units per acre) on approximately 38 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is A-12 (Multiple Family Residential) ; and from Washington County designation Neighborhood Commercial to City of 'Tigard designation ( Commercial-Neighborhood on approximately 4 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) . (Attachment "A") RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff's analysis of this request in relation to the applicable policies and staff's coordination with Washington County's planning staff, staff recommends that i the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the City Council as requested and approve the requested zone changes to be effective when the City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. OWNER: Russell Krueger, et al 14655 N.W. Hunter's Drive Beaverton, OR 97006 `s Mr. Krueger is the owner of 105 of the approximate 132 acres in the area. The list of property owners is attached. (Attachment "B") ! LOCATION: The subject properties are located south of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road, west of S.W. 135th Avenue and north of the properties that front on S.W. Fern Street and S.W. 136 Const. Assessor Map 151-33C Tax lots 100-108, 300 (part of), 900 and 1000; Assessor Map 2S1-4B Tax lots 100 and 101. (Attachment "C") j LAND AREA: 131.95 acres NPO COMMENT: No NPO comments have been received at the writing of this report. This area will be added into the NPO #7 area. PUBLIC NOTICES MAILED: 51 notices were mailed. i 2. Background On June 23, 1983, the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission annexed the subject properties to the City of Tigard. In June 1983, the City agreed to utilize the County's land use designation for the annexation area. These designations were closely matched to City designations. In April 1983, the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the land use designations for the Bull Mountain Community Plan CPO 49. This document was later adopted with the other portions of the County Comprehensive Plan via an engrossment ordinance. 3. Vicinity Information The surrounding land uses are as follows: The areas to the north of Upper Scholls Ferry Road are designated for single family residential with the City of Beaverton. The areas to the south of the subject area are also designated for single family residential, and are within Washington County. The areas to the east and west of the site are designated for medium to medium-high density residential, and are within Washington County on the west and the City of Tigard on the east. 4. Site Information The area within the annexation contains 131.95 acres, divided into 14 parcels under 11 separate ownerships. The property is fairly flat with 2 swales and some clusters of natural fir and oak. The southerly portion of the site which is at the base of Bull Mountain has steeper topography, up to 8% slopes. There are 5 single family residences within the annexation area; all of which are owner occupied. B. APPLICABLE PLANNING POLICIES I. Comprehensive Plan Policies All of the comprehensive plan policies were reviewed in light of this comprehensive plan amendment. This amendment proposal generally meets the plan policies related to citizen involvement, transportation, public facilities, urbanization, anu natural features and open space. The specific policies that pertain to the land use designation ere found in the Locational Criteria, and are as follows: Residential: 12.1.1. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH: STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 S ZC 2-83 - Page 2 a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. c. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS. Medium Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for medium density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which have direct access from collector or arterial streets. (3) Areas which are not subject to development limitations such as topography, flooding, poor drainage. (4) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (5) Areas within one half of a mile of public transporcation. (6) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. ( B. The following factors will be determinants of density ranges allowed through zoning in the medium density planned area: (1) The density of development in areas historically zoned for medium density development. (2) The topography and natural features of the area and the degree of possible buffering from established low density residential areas. (3) The capacity of the services. (4) The distance to the public transit. (5) The distance to neighborhood or general commercial centers and office business centers. (6) The distance from public open space. Medium-High and High Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. e °s STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 3 (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or ( arterial street. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (6) Areas within one quarter mile of public transit. (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. In reviewing the Locational Criteria, it is important to keep in mind that these criteria are general guidelines, and each site may not specifically meet each criteria. The criteria for Medium and Medium-High Density residential areas generally speak to the capacity of public facilities and services to service the area given its more intensive use. The following summary of those facilities and services indicate that there are adequate services or reasonable means in which to acquire such services. 1. Sanitary Sewer Service. An 8" city sewer line is available at 135th ( Ave. and Morning Hill Drive. A 24" sewer trunk line is located 1200 feet to the east at 130th Ave. This trunk will be extended due west across the norther portion of the territory by the Scholls Trunk L.I.D. formed by the City of Beaverton to serve southwest Beaverton near the P.G.E. site at Murray Rd. and Scholls Ferry Rd. The L.Z.D. will also extend the trunk due west between Old Scholls Ferry and new Scholls Ferry Roads. From this trunk the bulk of the annexation area could be served by extending a lateral due south through the territory. The remainder of the territory could be served by extension of existing city mains. 2. Water Service. Water service in the area is provided by the Tigard Water District. Tax Lots 100 and 101 at the south end of the proposal are within the boundary of the district. The remainder of the territory is not within the district, and an annexation to the Tigard Water District would be necessary. The water district has a 16" water line running along SW 135th to approximately the middle of the proposed annexation. The water district's facilities have been designed to provide service west to Scholls Ferry Road. 3. Fire. The territory is within the boundary of Washington County RFPD #1 which also serves the northern portion of the City of Tigard. This district is very large and can easily handle development of the property. STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 4 4. Transportation. The subject property is served by 135th Ave. and Scholls Ferry Road. Scholls is sufficiently improved to accommodate urban development. However, street widening and realignment of the Murray Blvd. , and the Old and new Scholls Ferry Roads intersections, will be necessary before full urban development occurs. 135th Ave. needs major improvements before much urban development can occur. Currently, a joint City/County Street L.I.D. study is in process for 135th Ave. The 135th Ave. improvement feasibility study is expected to be complete in 2 to 3 months. Upon completion, a public hearing will be held to determine whether to form the L.I.D. Land owners both in the City and in the annexation area are in support of the L.I.D. 5. Schools. The territory is within the Beaverton School District. The following information was provided by the major petitioner: The three schools that serve this area, their existing enrollment and capacity are shown below: Type School Name Capacity Existing Enrollment Elementary McKay 384 254 Intermediate Whitford 1050 963 High Beaverton 1800 1768 The school district indicates that adequate school capacity exists, however, some boundary or schedule changes may be necessary to accommodate anticipated students from the subject property. Police service, parks, library, and general administrative services are available to the area. Commercial: 12.2.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE TYPE OF USE, ITS SIZE AND REQUIRED TRADE AREA. b. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. c. APPLY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE OF THE PROJECT. 1. Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood commercial centers are intended to provide convenience goods and services within a cluster of stores. Convenience goods are goods which are bought frequently, at least weekly, and for which people do not engage in comparison shopping. The uses permitted in the neighborhood center include convenience markets, beauty shops, barber shops and repair shops. The range of uses is limited to those uses which can be sustained by a limited trade area. STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 5 A. Scale (1) Trade Area. Up to 5000 people. (2) Site Size. Two acre maximum. (3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies. B. Locational Criteria (1) Spacing and Location (a) The service area radius for a neighborhood commercial center shall be at least one half of a mile. (b) Commercial development shall be limited to one quadrant of a street intersection or where there is no street intersection, to one side of the street. (2) Access (1) The proposed center or expansion of an existing center shall not create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination shall be based on the street capacity, existing and projected traffic volumes, the speed limit, number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of the most intensive use allowed in the zone. (b) The site shall have direct access from one of the following: (i) An arterial. (ii) A collector street which will not direct traffic through local neighborhood streets. i (3) Site Characteristics. The site shall be of a size which can accommodate the present and future uses, but shall not exceed two acres. (4) Impact Assessment (a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. (b) The site configuration and characteristics and relationship to the street system shall be such that privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be maintained. (c) It shall be possible to incorporate the unique features into the site design and development plan. (d) The associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere with adjoining non-residential uses. There are two remaining issues to be resolved concerning the Neighborhood Commercial area. The first issue concerns the location of the area. Currently, it is located on the steepest portion of the site (about 8% slopes) which is not conducive for commercial development. In addition, there is a good possibility that the location shown may not be the most logical location once the final road configuration for the area is determined: that being Murray Road. Staff has consulted with the major property owner of the area and have agreed that when the actual road alignment is finalized, the City will request a comprehensive plan K amendment change for neighborhood commercial if it is necessary. ` i STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 6 ZC 2-83 - Page 6 �. The second issue concerns the size of the Neighborhood Commercial area. The County comprehensive plan has designated 4 acres for commercial area while the City's locational criteria sets a 2 acre maximum. Although the acreage is excessive according to standard, staff believes that during this interim time, before the final development plans are reviewed (including road alignments) , the designated acreage is appropriate. Until that time, staff believes it is appropriate to adopt the County's designations as indicated on the CPO #4 Bull Mountain Community Plan. 2. Zoning District Map All of the proposed zoning district changes are consistent with the comprehensive plan designations. Medium Density Residential = A-12 (Multiple Family) Medium-High Density Residential = A-20 (Multiple Family) Commercial-Neighborhood = C-N (Neighborhood Commercial) l illiam A.�Monahan PR AR D B Jeremy Coursolle AWPVED BY: WDirector of Planning Associate Planner and Development i' ,TM:pm/0105P STAFF REPORT - CPA 10-83 & ZC 2-83 - Page 7 S%g114 :TION 33 T IS R INV Y/.M. IS � .as....aro•.cc..-r o-[GO- - •'- =• � sca,c •'•ZC° �ssai� Proposal NoSEC - . i �;�� Is 130 30. +• ';�/! f: I I ( .it a•D as /�-•.''na j__'7 _= ��- \•r—_ I� Via• I� � / ��_� 31 " yr A N C H L' ;Y Y E:! R T R a C e au . 32 y:�o •—• d r / AREA TO BE j - - - - - - - - - - - - - --i re --s:� ANNEXED T1GARIP ZZ a s 51-78 ;`?,: .' i� WI/4 SECTION >: / T 2S R I W N.M. e+ - o� .r .® � �s 1.-a•�. o mss. 51 —,84 .v 't/!!!a6ssfele!/l� ellliia!!! a •,Pea 4/!llata ""imlllaxam iILCNIfllf7te�!!i!!ll lGltllYCD sagais6asaaaaa a i PROPOSAL NO. 1909 CITY OF TIGARD ANNEXATION FIGM FIGURE 2 Kruc);er 14655 NW Hunters Dr _✓e Beaverton, Oregon 97006 Duggan 11035 SW 135th St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Scott-Erickson Properties %.Halvorson 10525 SW Clydesdale P1. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Nelson 11295 SW 135th Tigard, Oregon 97223 Coe 11115 SW 135th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Wright %Fulop/Gross 720 SW Washington St. Portland, Oregon 97205 Jackman % Woodworth 1240 Simonson Court San Jose, Calif. 05121 Fulop Rt. 1 Box 347 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Aszman 12085 S.W. 135th Tigard, Oregon 97223 BEAVERTON ® �� -_:i1 i" i! p _ 1119 .� r� —.��'"' • ' F-�::`-� � ! ��_ _'� i i_=� -1'--��=Vit'--:: .:.--- -- ' "Ljga 71 ARD1 - 1; _��'=_ice._•• `'�' �; ''� s ,:s�r,�••\•'''�� 1 1•. �:li— 1\�.%j•+�a•' ., r':`1 ` .1� �J'1r•P -�; AREA .�, --; �� ° = -''% ,\ i v•. <� 1 _ �+• l'.-- �. lig .i:� .�. ��:. �. '�i'� �ti \ �� ' \\� •}•.. _...c. ..may., --••_ '�'. i -�. �t••::TO•••BE j-=:r-:r--�!={-j` :.i !. /' �/��••i ``=`..i�• 'A.Hh j •��"ice:; i JL_—,_� _'- i,-F1 ;C- �,ice J r.: `,� Tai= l z4 r CJ x To •:i?' -_- •, � ll aTi' . 7 lam'' _� if xULL KTX. t !. r.-_ i ' ii �'t• ii !ice .-Q i'..:-- .i s: �. =ir^' 11_.. _ _ L 71 l \�•• 'I IF TIGA'' TIG KING CITY ---- ��.`�� r 1\�?•• I _-__�. ---- :, r :;j - i _ •tri . / �30��`==T� �_. l'r-�i' : Wil`_- -•�• • _fJyF-�.�T=k �_ !—�� i, ` - ,. 1 _, -ate :! ;• ;1 ,--- DURHAM .• ,;�' '�-�Ji___---r n -Vii.-.:-- '• - k �� !. ! PROPOSAL NO. 1909 IN L CITY OF TIGARI3 _- r=_„ ,••a:��— -r�,, — ANNIEXAT ION -- FIGURE 1 • Commissioner Moen commented that the applicant had two things in his favor, one, the subdivision borders church property that will probably not develop in the near future. Two, most of the lots are larger than 5,000 sq. ft. in this planned development. • Commissioner Moen moved and President Tepedino seconded to approve Subdivision S 6-83, based on staff's findings and recommendations. Motion carried by majority of the Commissioners present, Commissioners Owens and Vanderwood voting no. 5.4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 10-83 and ZONE CHANGE ZC 2-83 Krueger/135th & Scholls Ferry Rd. NPO # 7 The City of Tigard is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Washington County designation 0-24 units per acre to City of Tigard designation Medium-High Density residential (13-20 units per acre) on approximately 90 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is A-20 (Multiple Family Residential); from Washington County designation 0-9 units per acre to City of Tigard designation Medium Density residential (6-12 units per acre) on approximately 38 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is A-12 (Multiple Family Residential); and from Washington County designation Neighborhood Commercial to City of Tigard designation Commercial-Neighborhood on approximately 4 acres, the requested underlying zoning district is C-N (Neighborhood Commercial). • Associate Planner Coursolle made staff's recommendation for approval for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Zone Change. He requested that the Planning Commission include tax lots 700, 800, 1300, 1301 and 1302 in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as Medium High density. ® Eugene Fulop was concerned that he would get medium/high density. He was satisfied with staff recommendation. 9 Marlin Hoffer was concerned if he was outside the Boundary. He asked who decided what properties would be included in the annexation. Discussion followed regarding annexation. • Russell Krueger stated he had only included those properties where the property owner had signed the petition for annexation. Also there is an LID for 135th which has been in the works for 1 1/2 years. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION w Discussion followed regarding the Urban Growth Boundary and areas of interest. Y Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to recommend approval to City Council of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 10-83 including the six tax lots that were not annexed, and approve Zone Change ZC 2-83 with a note that the C-N zone may be moved if necessary because of the road configuration. CITY OF 'rIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: August 8 , 1983 AGENDA ITEM # 1� DATE SUBMITTED: August 2 , 1983 PREVIOUS ACTION: Introduction at ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: July 25 , 1983 Council Meeting �.. Community Development Code REQUESTED BY: Planning COmmiSS1Ori �s DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR: HEAD OK: k INFORMATION SUMMARY Please Bring your copy of the draft Community Development Code dated June 1983 . Attached are errata sheets which detail the changes and addition to the code as recommended by the Planning Commission in their public hearings . Also enclosed is a package of letters submitted by property owners and concerned citizens . All letters have been considered by the Planning Commission with some resulting in changes to the code. In addition, a memorandum from the City attorney is attached. Some of the concerns expressed by the City Attorney were incorporated by Jeremy Coursolle in the draft. The attorney' s memo was not addressed by the Planning Commission due to the lateness of its submission to the planning staff. t ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED I t k rF f SUGGESTED ACTION c a 0 0 0 a ..+ •9 c� c C C > a �O 0 IOC iL ...s. CA � is 14 m b .4 43 yi C m a «. t, ci o 40 c a m -a y •c9 C w w sr m s93 0 m 6 m -93 4 c O. y m 40 O Cs. * m m m go O m d O C3. ) 00 m ...Cd 9 b E � ,,, «+ m to. r4 o o v z V m °. b N a. s m zi Z to � ca, >+ VCd m >' � a r.G60 ..+ a m m _m .0 o -•+ o ..a C bo m .�+ to � 0 v p . «+ m d d am F4 •�• �' c zm -4 ra .a+ a m mm m '; go to. .0 m >>o c>o+ ;d m Q w 0. a w v m a L) C&A o > m o LA a tta 14 t+ cd m t+ J-- ca i a cs m m a � m a o C wo w ae r+ O 11 to co m m S oNFfc a� Cmap . tr-+4 ' ii 43 0 .. > m 4 d d K a m m a y co w r4 m m .4 r4 co m w CD C cc to co O O. 'd Ch r-C A O m tj o m ) b r4 W to m o c 3 .,+ � tt+ 0.0 O 'O a ..+ m ec o. a cis :' �' co c _ z a a z a L o - a a co V m D p w co 10 0 L o 14 uj 14.8 O C A. U m m to o P.-O ii C) c � a o .N o DID m d co w V w V ..a -.+ ..' y v v &) o Ll O U •� c „N. m O 4.8 CD a a . O ; d z A -4 .r. _• z to a> 3 m m .0 � m O � C � O 0 m as m J-- C 0 -4 to ..+ aV4 La '110 O 0 C to 00 N 61 cs 3 N 0 V N C6 d Pd N b9 r-I O. O I d co A m d m v a w N c0 Go O O N N ca N d y co 00 coO O O r1 rt r-4 r♦ O 00 ao Cb 0O co a0 co ao r4 r-1 r-4 r4 .� r1 r1 r4 r-4 TA fA 0 _ v mch er) oil .4 Ca r4N N N N N N N ! R. m o o J3 ja 13 a � O t/d wA m to 00 cd is al .0 +1 d to b N b m U J3 m IA ..r b r4 . C m C r-4 z O d d fa V d -4 t+ 41 .-1 O to m O tma 3 i) tq ..a V w 41 w 0 0 cs -.+ ao 0 61 G 02 O w S ..Or im+ 1+ r40 U i7 r4 a 93S O vs O. 43 to b 100 m m. La to L O w V -4 to .0 V t. O 0 O -4 C1. .G O ... O a m d 4v to r4 O t+ m d O c6 „ter m ® � G O .m.. ra oma fes.+ m O - t+4 m cd m ca 4 a m ss. m ) a a.b w 0 s :1 'd t+ mm b ? C 0 a d to O ra .P %a � el-coo d v m rl .0 .0 b V m &) 4 t+ &; m N d V m LL ••a to v m z ® to o ta. -4 tai m y m ... ,� d y o m b to CSw a .ra . ..+ m 4.a a .a to N t" F4 .4 a -•+ UI � -4 -n 41 -t-,�7 S r-t Cd c 0 41 0 m >r �+ a ► z z b4 tpv oft 0 La La gcoo 40J ® sr tm+ tm+ tmi a C o S .-a . -1 ..+ tmc m U .:a m is 41 .aa a s o. a Ow 3 m a a o «d s s s s P13 ^ m ® N ch N N �C v v v ..moi O m 41 m m 0 V I N r-t N N N tra to ° ti7 0 O O O O O O O O O pp pp to p O O O O p O O O N N N N N N N N t f� 00 00 00 O N N N N N N N N N v4 r-1 v4 r4 N N GO 1O 00 00 00 00 CD 00 A ri r� V4 r-a r♦ r+ rt r4 r-i H W-4 r4 r4 i f N tro tri v-t m a x H C � ..� U > U m a Od M m V m O d 94 41 to 94 m ODS ® O me. t C tj .® o .�4 tr .eft � M .sa m O y V U O d U z d O OD d 00 L p W -4 z S r'.. O 6 o to 3 I > w 3 w a s oo z w C .e co w 14..r G >+ d P4 ..o+ a o o V. m z m z B w m tojj m ..r ..+ 9 60 to rd FA 41 a o O m m � s ..Oa ^� � .92 f! d «+ m ►� to W .9 U 41 S W S S O A ® V4 b bc r4 V CD d rO1 W W r4 r4 'md :1 � o 0 O 0 0 oD O ..�+ I m ri O ... •� «+ m a r4 ta m V41 L' m -ao Oto CD mz . to �rS m m O m Z G m W m Ai w_ w w �v o O a! v 4' °' :c.ate' s 64 w O O m m w m w 4 1 O 1 '1 .f m R+t+ Le .d y N CL b w eO m O m w ® so : w w O m m H 0 O m y L+ d u .-+ r♦ G ra O r+ d s o a1 +� s .. ,.+ O eD u ..+ w v eO c o rt a eO o m a.1 G m G d A O -� m C to .,• L+ -4 L+ m «+ G ..• m 6 V m _G _G •.+ •.+ tai co •.+ L+ ea cn m oa •.+ m o d «+ r4 .+ C -• gL®O rp4 s1 6 .mo.i yp m O L+ m m am� > y .rte O O da. 94 G: d Nto O O W 92 W d14" d14 d dN L L: 0 O• mm b m V C II s d 60 31 O "•� O O C O 0 IJ .Ui m r� m A m m -4a �+ v4 d d be r4 m m m L+ d eS O m m z m 0) m ?s V-4 d ..0. m ^ th .7 b ri L.r p] T7 V .� .. N N N � � ty 1] j] 'O m 00 00 DD 00 00 00 DO v v v v ca co A s� rl r♦ rl r4 r1 r1 r+ N N N N N N N O O O r4 r4 r4 1-4 ra r1 p.. A 00 co O� rt r♦ r♦ r4 r4 to At7 U V O V d d ..0+ 0 y .. ..,a a. 0 C; ..moi -4 46) d 0-1 40 m ��v d .O .0 to 94 41 94 0 as W 00 W -4 O — O .1.) d � to LI L w+ C 7 6+ O V .0 CQ ••d W O d r0 ..+ d 0 %o d f2 v a .0 m ,13 b C ® ep 4.1 a.1 O O b0 O -4 V an d 1a O O A ..+ rl V O O G %C V m J-- O d ..+ i) y •.a O m -r-1143 A 1. � yM ..6=0 G O p trf W - 'd X) i� to ..+ Cd O - m O d N V W ••a r-t V mOA . O C > o b - t+ G -4 O rr4 X. O V O Cu 0. e0 d W ego -,o N .O O b d C to r1 V r4 - t. e r4 G G . co to O ..+ a d m d —4 co m O a...a 4.1 d rA m C v m C O m -F-3,-4 to v H < a. %a ••+ L O t ..daO O ? a I G ..a a.� w G it - m < m ..4 b d d .N O -•4 O V ► i> .�! 43 1C 60 M .0 m •r. re V d W Ir •.d O C] d d •.a V B V 'd m V N Sa 0. m -4 U v L i> > U of w+ m m O !, > O. to -b V O • to O G V m rt &) -•e U m G O m m C m m m %a h0 Ra O 6a r+ d CY I 'Ci rd O fa J.- u b d .G hJ-- O a i2 M-.a rl 3d ..a as 41 m 0 &1 4j • 4 m a to d 0 0 wo m m O ar O. b V Ra N -b is 6 -.+ > 4jm «. d d o >. o a eh d V O t. o ra , o to a� 'a ZJ . m m m to u .. .,. m . ... co .G �a v a. 4) rte+ a ca o f .e m a t. +� o +� .-+ m 3 +� a.V •.-. O V L to +r t) .V .a-► O V V Pd to d to y r y .4.) (� O 10 O m m d .0 m m m C 6 >.as O d w w -4 z 3a ca w as O.-C O. o La p •.+ � !n. d L ..4 O t*t* C) O b m G O � m 6 end &) W b 60 co -4 m b w 0 m O b R. O O L+ Ra V N m a > rd m .. m m m ••+ W to -4 -4 m •.+ r1 r-I O m C G -.+ m m GL 'G G C b k7 O 41 ri J-- to N d .0 O V] O o «-0 .M r4 e0 �. � .I--) r--4 L m re Ra O a O L C F,W •.a V N O ••+ d ..+ to � L3 w —4 a "a m o b 41w o41 towbb _ -a D0.a _ L) 4A..+ ;a U m 9=O OO lh 'p W r4 d - Im O Cd r4 4. r-t d. N b cn O P. L b W w d C LA m m L 60 C O O m Gs z 60 tom+ cd ..O.c d O0 W G rd 1 I m m s m m r I r/ .-0 ..4 ..rd Om b F re CV) M x cbo %D ce) I a7 m E.a r-e rl r♦ Dc .�] w d .O 'p ..+ ..+ V V w �c+ cn e» ci o n. by N N N N !h Kr cn N In V r~ rI rc r4 ra r-1 r-4 r4 r♦ r4 rc na ra a a a 'C9 � b .ra ba s o m v W ri m v a a v o m d y .re 0 0.10 U 10 r-4 aO m 9 d > Y' .N b W a aam OJa G d a a O m 4 r.o O = m ..`r. > o .r . a Atm.s ee r.) f" r•I oi � E :. o0om43m a0 d ® .`° s : V4 ''f %J2 e0 = 6s 60 0 b .0 p" o a b JG o m s •w d G o a O O O Q O T d $ :q 0 a d o b d m m a so m b m ••+ 0 0 as co 0 .0 .0 ® w b a m b a 0 a .0 as a ..• a eras m m .. a � � p, o .d V4z d •d o a o •O a a> fu N0 Oa � ' aamV .0d/ --7 6e d O O ~ W 4b 3 p er4 O 0 ad m b .. 0 -4 d 0 go -4 .+ w V bo o T t. d � > o T m m c 3 w m ed r-4 a s H WO ,.�+ Oa Ja t a AI a -4 ad a 0c4e) Ka teR. m� d O O .+ m o � 0SA + to V O to b E C t+ ca . d a w rO &% ri O m O a . co a r4 1=41 O V O C: O a 0 m r-I d 0 Le O r+ O. " -4 t, d 0 a a rI ..e W t. .11 st 3 d b m O . 4 d to N m -•+ �6' m O• d >. -P R7 d a b b d w fL 0 co d d -&-) 0 d O •.+ 00 w .a f3 b .0 er ,'� +► •.+ O d a d sa ! d o. 7 6 d a! U o b o re •• w .a C. «. m b to b a 41 AA< ri ta � o 0 o ive � 0 " m ea; # 40 4d r4 0 o U 43 60 wo a � r ow910 =s © ozss PUd'b z DIN a� 0 s 43 .0 0 o cn o m m GI r-I a m m 0 a o °o m a .OI w a d s2 U woO t d d ..0. e) ri ..! 4 In •a tai fes+ a a we e-1 m er/ d I Cs. r483 0 ►fid Ot ® O O -4 m Rf 46MC fdlg CUIL4 -11 "4 d4 "4 o co 'A 0 o a O mG) 0 40 O W7 O > o a a a t►. O ... «+ ..+ 00 O O b U ri rI ,.7 O o en to ro O J 1 'b b R+ ' ^ - O a a 0 d OO 4 C0 /' A a3 N N 0 ., 7C s-+1 w. rl ►"I P-1 rl rl rd rd r4 rt 1 v 1 i I I +-t r4 J p1 J J J J .—I .J ^� y D�7 Q y to vo fr to o a O O s a ~ .ro+ �-s fJ C 4 to to �.t m •.+ O 0 w CD .rr H d d d a1 �p .N W r-1 00 wdi to � O i f].IMe O D m A b cr m C O • # O - O fir 0 yt a0 a to -rt O 41 C as w m N � i � @ V -•O+ co 7 m C6 .+ e0 'm b 0 Cd coo + e w •- a 0 a C ! O O F+ C an d m O O d O O C a.) w V m 0 v O 0 -+s V -4 d cd -O r &) in W -r+ 0 d 94 .N P d4 f&f 41 0 O > v d = O a -ria � "4 O 0 C .2 O �o -4 O t+ rd 0 03 C b --e O t r K) ji N d W 41 O d ca r4 0 p, © Q -4 r 4 • -•�� O 664 m S ? Rei 0 0.. 6+ O .G to 0 ra M O as H H O 6a •i O ® s s s eh 41 -4 r) <n pQ -4 _^CQrf %00 %0 CO .r+ O Oa O iii w N rl er) d w d 94 S Y i r-4 � 11-04 r4 %0 tr) d 5 t0 J.) C a7 fr 8 .ra O 7 +� m t+ d Rf m tt r♦ O O O d P P .0 >s O CL Ol ji .-fie a) m N i+ C rs ® kU C cr) --esa d O ® 0 G ri r-t co C s N Cli m y . 4 b 10 v 3 j m cs a at r+ ..• O O O dU N N 92 r, at 94 .re r -4 y ..e -r4 Ri 1C d 10 Vv qd ri CS Re 'O -a Ca. 04v . C C N N P r r N d r4 2r CN Cr) (n f (� 44 ry 0 0 0 0 0 Co O O O O o O o 0 Q +1 d U1 Vt 1A to F� r. d in rI N fro O to O O r-! O Cl O O O rf T4 O O oa rot R r) r) a cn r) r) er) o to cors r) r) 00 00 00 CD m 00 00 00 00 00 00 O 00 00 C] ra is rd rd of rl r-1 H t-i rl r� Q N N pd N N N N N r) �Q. d P r4 r+ r4 a f f t f f f A A rt r� rl rf 4 r-4 H ra ¢pm � F+ a ptpsr .L' C7 C co M N I bd m •O .t] 119 A v Q W a to r4 '4 O O w N V r4 m rP-d ..e 4 .0 .r+ CL to C? C C � is A. as w > ..0+ a ® 0 0 1062 d. ria a a .a 1� e+o sPa m .a ..Cs �° 30, .c a ea O V to O .O CP +a t®+ JOa O 0 m m a9 t+ 1 oy 0 6' Cwp camas O O M O r4 is • > Cor4 C M dO ww0i° .4`i0c9 ; = o � = 9 . 41 ro = � �W to 0 A tom+ 7 Qe as O C C 41 t9 W QrCaC-a0e a C reWOf COQ.b 41 d ISo N O b 41 ..r dmOcr. n: 0 . O m t Ca W ta O + 60 N CO N 0 "r ' 3t m0 to C M •.moi r♦ M �. G to O9 3 m G w ..+ r-i H 1 M Ga co v 0 N •! Ea N 41 = r♦ ® m G1. �► N Z m r-4 M �w {a O 0 to .i' 0 Z co N W m r-e J0.1 W C •'� R+ -0s v 41 N � •O 0 IJ � > G r♦ Ll O C m W •0 Lm 1 0 O N d C eR O Z .moi O N ++ G v O v'► d 0 C cd 0 f N Z C^! Cf) 0 0 0 ca rd N S d r-1 N CV ►� C! to NOQ p• �.. v •S a 6a C M � y CC � M C 07 ® aWC CD OO m O CO ®r-I $0 N O r4 -a 4rOl v rt Zrd 00 bo 'd O 7 m N O V M N N AOa 00 Le 93 93 rl ..r f ,f1 r•I 1 A O O L4 0 m N f m a = pt C C OWD ..4 .ey r-t r•1 ++ O ® 93y •d q +C G Rt aN.• t3 re Al ..r LL s. r4 Q Ns 0 M v 61 C8 a ^ �► _ M Z M r♦ M M ® W v d. co ® to RI Q d• _G rS d r-e •O m eN O O p m p o = O Oco It`�.eO O p N N to0 C14N N » M r-1 M C Men M M M co 00 r3 C r•a rl ed � C6 -.. M r A CO 0- p. ri r4 ra ri r1 1 1 7 n. ..� . .fi "4—d .. __. - r-0 ao vi .d 00 ,d m 0 s w m m a ...4 9 m °°� ..0+ r+ �. of .0 .oa N r4 41 41 co s Ct w O m � d '0 0 c� 100 $ co 0 4d S rf 41 w ed "' y1 b m V V cd O 0o O p0 >1w 00 o ar „.4 � ti ae � w w 41 � v � o 0 7� V o 0 • m - _°' m y c y. a m a gra M ++ o s 63 o a a cd 4j v s>7 w w w ° c41 wo r N $ IA Mw m in s rl e» w m m p +a Q 0 to Id 00 41 N M+ eA A C s+ 0 M w w y $ O. 4m N V O —4 � C to O CO � < N to w4 <J �+ C wM A � = Nr♦ my .. 0 «+ N m to d —4 to ami —4 N fi 0 1 Co3 ci $ NM a � >myr- •1V.+1 wO •d.+1 .= ¢ 44vSO 4 m IWt Id 0 '0 G 0 _4 bo O OD O .i Or4 COr)1 zON T m S . = iLZ.r O m ra arr4 V r- N 40 m N N No .S r4 Nc. Nr+ N 0C`:3 y Le er1 cn rci ': a; e+s cNcn gn co co Go D-0 cod 4 � Y ra r4 AA .0 r4 E r-1 Lae 00 S rid tae r• rl 1-1i x w 0 41 a m a. m -0 m boo ..e rhe m S .moi r4 tZ J3 i.1 .sa r1 r♦ 1 10 0 v '0 M 9 N N m rl N O O co r-0 C% .t! r-B O rl N N M N N M Go 0a r4 r4 Nco co N N N 1 1 r4 1 _..... — N N 1 bttl r; t d N 1 1 1 1 1 s^1 ra r4 .`'4.� '-c-+ --' �' •-+ c:, ca m � x a > s s o 0 V >. R1 r-1 -a S m1 m Lr G >.b V M � G 1S w m RS . d v A m 'D s 00 o �• b r4 o0 .4 cd .o b -4 -4 0 o o w m m ! o ra .-+ cd w O .O ... m C a o - O V tj N td A A V w 'sr_O w •0 m O G CL r1 60 - m b m V O w 1r1 S• S 4.1 A .-1 r-I is A r1 -4 m w ra cd m V 61 td d -+ 6,m O Ra V) 0 d .� 'b r-! w d •0+ m ga d ..0+ V .0 ..+ Q G A O OD w m V w w C m w m `d e4 m cs m ..Oa 4.1 A O -4 W m d1 a1 V w G d O m cs d d s 1 m cd W V m O 60 m Pd O 94 r-i Q .G 04 ed Q. 120 ..r w {� G "A ca.s m 0. cd $ QO w 0 0 O .0 cd 0 .0 14 A 0 � Q O c0 -- 6a t o cd w0 40 w G 4v to 0 d R " Ot i1 0tO r-1 0 cd wA °1 cd C m O cd O .4 0. W m to d V O to w V ad m V U m W L m «+ G m .0 o m m w k .� 0 +) o •.+ m w co m c: m = o o -01 qy O .er .y2 -4 .0 .0 C -W .r. ! G 3 w V -4.) 41 m 11 .v4 +1 cd r- d.1 41 m O m M J.1 A - m y1 W 14 C .V b ro U O R+ O tr O C ra W G m 63 cd m cd m CI O m m N G F4 ca S:3 ca v cd 3 x m .0 ym ~ 41 U ani 411 M A w b d 0 O m Ill W d 66 O m ed O O O 92 .0 .0 41 co A A V -+ Aj w 00 14 3t ! x t U .G 0,21 iU S i t rC V 41 O ! C2 00 ..e r-1 ! t _ m v 41 U1 0 � 0 r0 M 00 y co 0 r-1 b W S A � d1 O .4 d 4 •.� r•i A � cl V 11 d s c Q Y r1 q v 9), V ® O d N N a 4 M M C.9 00 v - co (a rr4 a �- F O BS N CO co 0o a � N N N r4 �4 c� v .r`.s ►, o a d ra d a MoD O 0 .0 b O ods G .1=0 os -0. -two .:a w 1 ;1 m O 13 ja m 0Aj � Oa d d 1 .da «O+ O 41 O .N @ 0 41 v v0 ,, -40 .dope�10 a 40 $4 ao 6 a 4s 414m a d IA 41@avv Cda 3 mm cas 0Cd O 0 'O > •.4 rl O -o @ .+ o@ rdaa b@O o +1 � 6 Omy O @ @ p t04)0 41 a rl oo o +1 ta 4 r4 r-4 U at d d ® ••0-0 Aj ® d m •o �' m cz m m @ ® a ..4+ o a tq ..a .IA .11 VA 0 to a rg .a r4 m d A o As 41 @ o yca 0 IS a. .1 p O 60 0 91 . a� � eq .o . % •Coaa. 00 31 m Qw + m ax w m � Q0r10 as 4; � bm rl I•s 00-4 W a l .G m rl m a r4 42 VA O O. ... d d ..+ �1 @ O .d •.+ V H 00 41 84w td t-4 7 > C d T ra A i 1 O l d m @ a 11 m O@ d94 Li Ui, @ 'CO O da Vd b�aa0 Vv O w a r@ r-4 a O O O W ®0 O. O a d O GO O =1 W 9 ..r %0 N @ 2 .., .., 0 4) ..a .aa p p d y d 1 ski .4 a0 O@ O Ma .o O N .oa � N N A •0 i+ to @ O@@ (3 C9 ® O 6a N !r ..fie .G � @ 4+ N H @ V N1 N X rl cn tR a r0 C1 •.a 6 rC ® •O as @ m d .a t a . .0.1 !�1 @ A 4) • �a O cz 13 V c .►1 v 0 of J2 41 29 0 V 04m E-c w 0 m d m K m w m %a moo a • ss .G r-1 0o $ ja .-1 z r-1 H ® � c m m w �L z O •C? C4 z •t9 0 a p rl .c d v 7s< ra z a s s •d a � w o o ou @ o " ;1 o w .o d 9' ® O u0 @• }2 1 l w d 40im 1 p a cn e as C4 53 N ta O �+ O la rr4 al rr4 r4 ® N = N N V N N @N US 14 4 Cs7 M M m M O _. �] $ r4 pp Go 4) 00 OQ f A rl M. rl •O r4 ri T r-4 P cl` ®° N cr1 M t+1 Cr1 P1 N C4 N N 1 1 ! 1 1 R. .J � 3 m d x � 6s va — _ m L •d t� � 0 wAO dA. D v4 0 � vja ® l � U w;O a ; a aC � m C: Cv 0 - a. o � � a dao 04Nm O to m to CV) v O d O e d go O mi) some $' w u +► v o tit V 0 m> N bt m m d d a) a0 W � . U 0 .4 w O ® w A v o a' t+ is w 0 m o � 4d 93 i v 0g � "0 � +r +r w m o0 00 - d w if 4j .0 Oo f 1 'b 0 w 03 O y � 0 ai is M V &a 63 V to O 31 co 00 u . m is is 0 4D to H40 , o -0c CO 0 00 d La 0 Cal V 46) 0 tL L + L G W O .0 m -4 O S O .0+ 60 m dO G ' v� 'b � m -4 W 41 ® Oa 94 ir- cc� 3 0 00 t+ 6+ am m O � rr m .0CID OG Li A m L, = r m a d � 0 .0 .r m d 1-f m. O ar .r vW G3t 41.8 0 L d d 41 w ww O LA A' . dd CL d d d cd d Co49O b .0 4+0y > Oto m m .4 b G b O m y d ij r-1 0 co La N m d N G G C N -4 -4 . m m m '.S �; •O4 a00 Co -4 N -4 -, 0 60 d .0 Cr C RI m > 0 ••+ .•+ .•+ N N rC rt N •� L) .-1 m N l 0 0 0 60 N W Cfl ..s tw ',, 0. 0 .v " 0 0 rt !m � ri r-4 M C+oy �► �• 9w > �- d V Oso a qa C! sa v af! .-+ O ` f+ sa m E?r b 't7 64 00 r4 p J S s d 04 4V � z � r9.t � C.i01 t! �� r�i r0d s�3 rid S� O tOT 90+ r�'l d 00 C $ O ` G ••+ v O ..tea A O 4 tP1 X49 v -4�0 H C? m Ar is m �+' r4 .d a m C5 as t ra .b r-4s m m . r♦ r.7 m m .et a O .m.. +� N O t O O QO -Wn N Q-e N N Cit N R�R� N N N N N CrS C'7 cn Cif Cl! CO cc co Go Go 00 W-1 74 rl . v Nf � F1 Ch N to Ch Cn NI CA t t v-4 -. T-4 94. ra .fir d PIN o ato x r+ G 00 a � w0 amc b .b d b m Ll m v a. 0 to b z a m m ta :� a a to cm+ a r to �O rN1 Eo Obo � O U ` d O ) 1-1 tr) d r �• -•+ O r4U z O O d -4 N m r4 m o m m v j .yrs .m+ voi. 3 �3 ' o00 W 9: Q ; B Gam'= r0+ Oa .# .Lt is O m .0 r4 m •r+ m O t+ O d y U en O h• to m W m 6014 -•O+ -.a = -4 r ow r♦ m • 00 to A.) &) t9 m N) 1+ d O V r1 Cd O O O O b d-� O ..a O O O m .0 O tn ..+ m 0 +� .0 O to 0 a) c) to e0 O r 1 0 O W ® A.) m t* \ i� W W r r.: > c 40 41 L3 r4 O si d O 0 ..0+ •d V C+ r01 !d r1 C3 N --9% o m 3 -4 m m F 44r-4O W -4 O O O co � O b W M C rl 6a ba O � ® as 49 0M .0 u � 0 w W i r1 ra V1 t00 v4 .•L r1 Cr/ 4f r W d r4 W v M b r O i2 le .093 Gu i+ca O V-4 O m 'W Ll 39 .,+ O G +� d N) 0 to O .i? Z L ®+ r01 pPA � {'+ M d O N to b m 0 1ta O tsa W Se•� O to 8 ! m PL V .O.m O r+ a *0 O W s+) st .4 W VI) ,El41 r4 H _ s a. t es ba m ao ^4 Q O -14 1 — en .0 as 0 a o w to ». A .. ) > o a •.+ W eo cs t+ 1 ea 4) H 0o b O C tl 6ti7 lot C .W�+ O x w to -4 O m C4 r1 m O O O 1`] C ri O O m ri ..s .!! C V-4 N H p H •.+ C N N N U' -4 ..a cn r-1 V G •� O to C> v 9 m o 0 0 t" 0 to o t+ d d Q ra o a o O ® o C4 •o n c�i c� x m 0 ••+ 0 e 41 C2 61. E� 0 r4 m ao H c s s� 6� a c U C c 6 ta m s m � o � c. � s� r� •� w 0 .°�° oo 00 00 0 O 00 • x = 0 .e .4 o .- c+ 0 co O co H � .03 r-4 W X: G r4 ra r 1 V U r� V V H x N Q V O •O H i Cf) r-1 Q en %n r♦ N C-4N 1 r�1 rIl .i r4 r: s�1 rt r♦ r"1 a C: er La 94 94 0 94 94 iLl w wo ea ? X: uwC3 U .LA m LA .0 y @ 10 A � ti 0 go ti � bo La -4 M .•. V V ad to Cu b d 10 b '� H � 0.� S2 A p 0) C a Y - m .0 to V «4 to 03 p M �• N 4 V Cd d �4 CIS 41 do Id 0 eh -4 C N2 M -im b Z tom CID G. m G Rs 1s .b r4 W d ® m ; Y N �o t0a G Oi m . 93 93C ..0+ Y V O 0) O 0> 41 O M td LE w 3 3 b ..w+ y ta0, .0 GGg w .®Q .0 C o 00 P v V 1 VCO OS R1 O 0 O 01 0 w O O C7 O rl v LQi > O r1 N r4 r1 •CP t0 R, O. r♦ .p -4 .p •r+ eP -4 %D 41 - Y W ttl etl r. .0 C 40 0) a r40 to O � b .0 it Of .G rCID pt i' S $ r� r4 T T O rl k+ H 6t V - - O r4 yl = O to 0 to = a ..moi ..moi G 02 0 G to d 03 w C 'O h to C -0 -+ a f.+ ed t0 CIS J-- >1 M Ds7 0 Ia as t+ V to 0 `) m 0cu - Y Le + 4 $a v1 O 62 0 482' t+ .6r 0f 0/ 0) .Ort C N C co i oa a o. toC W O 00 til •.w$+ b ao VA 64 4 r4 O COj V V V 91 r=1f H .moi 6010 C r♦ to C4 V O C . ctrl v1 P V 06t W• 0� Y V C C 1a :v S r-1 M C C C 0 —4 m O to it 6a C V as Ma ba 92 0> C O we C r4 N A N w 81 •.. d Q O vin 0 co 0 V vOi .4 Sio m •0 10 O O O O O Cl O O -IJ O rl tD m O Ln Q Vl 00 %D 0o t7 . ..E p,41 ¢, .N aJ of O O O O O O O to 09 - i+ 0 0 d .O t0 00 O N O t0 to w O 00 Ll 00 w w &0 0. 00 C O O rl t0 C M 00 00 00 00 t0 OD 00 r< H .N N d M 81 r1 rl r1 r1 r4 r1 r1 d •C ►� co O rt -0 III M M M M Q •O •tY •W yet Q %n U9 an 00 I 1 1 1 I ! 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 M r-t r4 r 1 r1 r1 r♦ 4 H r4 r4 I rl r4 r4 r� rd Pa �.� 1 —4 -4 4 —4 H pD d a a Id d 0 0 to tv ..�+ .0+ .00 y yIV O WO >c w >� ti. L m O fi O to m ' O d 92 00 co m VV r O r4 r-1 L d d r-4 O 0 r1 b y m y .0+ d d p m Cyt m w L oD b m p y V y d O v m .J Cd Q t0. t+ b m L m a y 4 .. s " d s m tj 3 O m m m m r4 0 = •Oa Lw 600 +� �qy d r1 .N -4d S d ® .� ate• .r. to w ►t m G a ra 1 0. •. CD N y m " d 7C L M 4 B ~ p d B CO w O� m B Ln Cd O B ..0+ �n d O O •" 0 O41 to O to NN ' CD d N N d ••+ N y Si. yd O m hi Cf) V Q OO y) 000 VM 000 rC L COO 0 coOO V CO t0 d G .,.. y V N---- d OO • U O C m 00 O r4 'O ra m rco r4 �i tL � '►d a r4 0 L z U m m U V . d A La KL m i� r4 w r♦ i d d pLl is d L Z S A L i isLe o n i rd+ ® m s 41 10 Y ,Le v yt a i [ .�. m m rmi a m Aj °1Go40f •ta rl 41 ++ b V-4 O N L m E b ! N cs A O O. b 6' d rl m O 4 1N rd N Le O rd v N CV) B B M1 4d! y y L go U B 6>,cn P V s B DD Q P B 1i O O O O O O Co O O O O O O O M %D co O N N %a �o N N N N N N N O O O f-1 1-4 r4 H O N [ 6] H p O O O O O O •.+ O O O O O O O i! sSJ W 00 OD OD 00 00 OO GO 0o co 0o co 00 co s Pail co 00 00 rid rd rel to r•1 r4 r4 H r-1 r4 r4 �;^. L] r4 .r-� r-i r-1 t ra r4 ra N (n en d d Q f h7 cr) w V1 vl %a f A 00 O D, rJ ra ra rJ r4 r4 ra r{ ra t W d C C ..+ U > > V-4 0 H 5gi 1 G►. U m .d 60 • 6 T w�+ 's H Y d d i► R+ -4 Ls ++ •w a .a to L ' Mw m 0. 93 m W m O 96 6 60 V S 'O L. 4 d m m A rA w m R7 S 44 0 baLn 0 0 O 8 b r♦ GS d w L+ M d -O+ L U Y -a C d m G O 44 ..r 6 S -0+ C 9. .r.. o a0� t70S 60cod L Lm+ .14 ..� L+ C O S B C W to O Le r-11m -0a d d -1e to .0 Ls 12 -a vo Oco 41 m 7C Id Ail � v 4 � N m 0 b ►�r4LM r w co w m w m 7 w ..0+ m A uO GI O W w V d V > v 4a C .0 d .tea m .4 SL' C O La go ..Ca 4j M 00 0 m to U L+ d r♦ d T L C -a to 6? 0 40o to m T a o .� o c 3 a r+ Ln to m m m m coo 0o 9: ri >r r+ 44 ": a � � � � N -4-4 w . m L. x 9a > O CIO cOa 4) O rd ra O 40 .0 V V a O d0 � � c�6 m L+ d � q a0 Ldi =g .e .0 oo 0o O d co Gd 9d o0 x co H O. O Y is 4 r4 Q S S S rl U r1 T d w N m 00 L d O 94 41 bo z W y Lm. G a v > d d as d m O ► W r't ...co ..� � C •.Wi ra 3 J"- 0. O La 0 00 O b 419i ta r♦ C r` .0 C m to 0 0 r-a d � m 'r - mar 8p m mw .:a ami cos r4 U d s w a •mo ao a1p0e m bo 0.-440 0 41in 10 ca C: sr ° a. Lo L' '-toyi tW :° a V-4 41 � o . dd P3 92 00 Q .0 rep. A. � r,4 Y a 0•C.� O •O r1r ; -4 c) cd A N r4 r-4 J--en (0.l A eL o o C -4a 00 A O O O O O O d -. ss O rn 0 O co P e4 r+ ea O r-4 U N fY N N ..Cao .0 C st b to m OO O O O G C 00 N C r7 m = co 00 00 00 co � � 40 0 0 4) co co :+r N ®p 0; .--f co t: 0 w O CO co m y A r4 r4 V4 ri as L. C7 -+ ri H L. d .r► rn m %0 %D %0 ao 0• a a 00 r4 r4 rJ r1 r-! H r4 74 N N N N CAn.r ea r•a rea r� r-a 0 U U V U U C a0 60 60 m ED a a 4 rI r-1 a w s m _`o of c 0o o ; m bo 60 T b M C .8L a O g► 'O CL to B4 V r`/ t+0 a o a o rs .; 0 Cd 3 a a m a m � a a a no a a 0 > > ..�+ m bd r� V2 >tt Os 00 � m A � N Cdj t0 3J O 6 m m m m .ai f�a m w 0 � ..Q�i O a b "r Ya b O 9 Z m b O i C to od W � ,� d ad d d m .r+ ,Q C C ZSa d -I..)t �.e E4 r4 Q. f.+ i .0 0 W mo t) 60 d d W +e ,� w } to �d p' .0 42 o m m e93 0wd CA 43 d 42 co C"m Uo� p m a f3i b m sz � s w c E-c m - ..r m N w w C U O to a O d 0 N +7 ..) .4 .Le ..+ m ol Ll > ' .V -d JC m 0 N41 d 60 C'4 1pt C14 r1 d -4+ ad ••a i N 4) 7 0) r4 O O 00 1i N �C m ►'� C .'L' .0 .Z JtID A 00 to e0 AL, 'O .-. .r0 r-IO a O O U ..+ O .0 w O � O ..+ O ..Or O w O t0 -S0 Cl) V Ll in N 4 4) r4 = 7 m O b O q O ..+ O U O La ! N 4) .0 W y .v gtj Le b O O N a N co N N O� O� yl P .7i rt fa ..Ca .Y3 .0 r•I d G C G L+ W CO �I 0 v oo 41 41 r4 eo 0o a oe m ac ae r-4 as z o0 I O.0 O Q +� r+ O d ..C+ w a w S O W m 40 m cs � 7+ t+! C r4 94 10 r4 co m m ^° H m m ri �► i Id m 47 a ••+ ••+ m a C I a to 92 m O ® m O m m i Q .� i m m .sC+ do 0a m m r^! 61 r.1 ra CP se fJ w r1 r1 m a6 r4 m m .0 A La ad m V wv 1 O N r-I CO) N 00 N M N M G O V C I ® _C O O C fir O L w N N 'Q a ON r4 m 6� O = a' O• O. a. . 39 60 co r4 CI r4 r-4 r4 r4 r4 .. i O N CO) M M `Q 'O Y9 Ln �O ap �O 00 0% r1 .i rd N f f 1 y1 A Hd CP o r40 a r4 x C: 7C > d40 2 .� r1 bid rj N -O r) O O O L C m CO) .0 r0 to - � > N m G Q � to � y a7 d to Mb -4 W b d y' id Sd r-1 O m v 41 Sma O. � � ri - G - r-4 of C +� t r+ 1. 3 j � d L, t" a L, 7 as b C7 - t, m d avow " a m p, r,Or .1.) to O O w O W d N . 10 c w N # O d 6 m41 cd r4 � uw.. w 3 C r4 10 Lam , N C r-1 s d d DD d d -r, O .fir 't7 41 J) - V d r4 to p0 a, b L G L O d --4 Z Cd m d r+ co 41 w N d m c) G L+ N m .O O O O O60 U b 0 0 3 o a+ co t9. = s m '4 r4 m -60 4 ra 0 C b b v � m m CO N t10 .� 00 O, co N G ++ O -r+ m G rdl r-! Z Z ri w r4 s d ;a ra Le •^-' O Le m GL i. .. 41 aO) m m m m v .a a o. - d u fes., La rr4 8 .1-+ W 41 -1-i d m b tO.D O V Ai U O. G O 0) G Z T E O M) OO of .-1 N C G L+ A w O O v C -d -4 .d 4) 1 O w &) rA O L+ m m C m -C Lm.) r-1 rO-1 .O+ -� d «� rl d A � ® N y O r- i2 Gtv LA .r, .0 00 ••a •.+ mgo 41 62 rl m dm y co O) � m C) Cl W r4 Lo CIO m a m 41 44 441Go b 0 43 � .�M La m W a-+ rl 92 C rd CO ri m a W m � t.? V O` -O ri N -4 N ri 0 b m Z O r4 WN M m Cd 'O Cd 'b � .ts 4 aw .0 o o m bo 4) s LA406 m a d t e0 e4 41 r- � m m V C 0 rs w or d r"4 N C3 Qdm cn � y r-d > m a 0b 42 ao U b -r+ as 0 O d d m 03 O ;r ra m N Z a m d d r1 0 0 ri pr L2 O m O O .+.1 O n w C6 I O O m O N r♦ a -4 f., .O N N C N N «e QO m N N d b N i OZ ® ) r4 O O m O O � L, y O O - O cr a) La -r+ L O O. -a r/1 •D r4 O f to V to r� O O @+ m m re O O L+ n r4 U O ra d .-+ ra m r-d s r-4 m d 4 y d r4 T-4 m ra r-4 -4 = @ 1-4r4 d � 0 • L, a G 0) - . > m w +j m ... m � G ao co O co do n O m o 00 0o a 00 . r1 N d 'D V H --I r4 r1 t 7 r-+ r4 H W 03 EJ r4 *-t W r4 P - i an b N r4 r-) r♦ r-) r4 N N Cl) C7 -7 I P-4 opt no 3 o m Is co u m x Ca .O taJJ � CA 7C U m to m r# m 0 3 w •v m O O r. C v r4 m a0 'O G. is �+ °s .�.: rr-I Oo w emo m s m o e m a o � c� m co cd ii E m H .rCi to 60 C O m CL OD m co -4 m m o o a Z In co m cl .. ��. °' °° 3 O tow e3o oe 0iz co ..� b C b N b t y0 V + .c Z C ra Z C co 1 L+ C 'O v ad 11 •a 46 m O O '040 ad Le G ao 3 .0 4))bo C b F Lm+ UOi o cd �+ - CD m —4 to 00 � m .1.) y 0 Id 60 'd r� d ri - CD W m e w41 w a > ,� Wb c3iw co 4 •.4 eo v m X o > w c ,-+ r+ c 0 c «+ d a m d d •-+ a d a N to o m co m m «+ o o °4 o o a) o o u o +j s N Z O rl rd -7 U1 •r+ N N w i) r0 co m O m r4 w r-4 4 rt r-I b Co m O O V La 93. co o � m •3 O O v o cd o•bo z G 0+ r4 .0 3 ..y we N U y N N U r-4 y' cn L r••1 m U 0 43 O r4 m ad >1 r-I r'I r-1 m v-4r♦ m .. 7 aZ ,C e O • L+ .0 m c0 m OS O y a0 • .0 i+ C1 M C ra 0o M H .0 00 00 d S o O 0o wJ-- - 00 N +.) N d ••a Z ra A Z y r4 r1 H N y r4 to r4 Z to V r4 O O °Orm LG — i s C y co 0 d 0) r♦ C cd as .r+ m O m w y v eo V .0 ... y C ..+ m 0 r4 y O N N d w O N 6 G O C m m ..• yw rw ra 0 o 0.90 v .0 A ria . ,G m O y a G m m V rr4 o W ad L, ..+ N Vd is m OO m G Le 'cT 4j M r{ m c0 .a O ..+ N C p C y pp d d d d U 1� eo o •-�d C �D V c o 0 0 0 0 0 .•+ v) r' .o o r) 00 r-+ O ra ra O O as C m m 1 cb O m V d] N O O O O C' �D N r--1 r"1 to c0 (-+ r4 N N N N M <n Z y m r 4 fi r4 r-1 r4 r4 r4 r4 r♦ L+ L+ CL H O) m 0. aj f= r-4 -4-4 r4 r-1 rr-i —1.1 r-I $ H O Com) p m N r4 O a N 10 � �p 0p O N N CL cn K) cn Cl) 8 -I1 DJ co •O 00 CT O� 4` ra r4 I I I 14 C: co 1 1 I 1 I 1 I H H r 0 r 4 H c I H 11 H 14 14 H e•-0 N H H H H � .•f.•:ry ..�L. ,.k � . ,�:•��?ri�t�d�9�;i, :+�.+�1(f"�:l:f{��1��' 11 tii.ti•i .. • ,t�� 1 HOME BUILDERS'ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN PORTLAND t 15555 S.W. BAMGY ROAD. SUITE 301 �7;T!"• _ ' OREGON 97034 503/684-1880 \ LAKE OSWEGO. O ..` ��!1 1 THE HOUSING CENTER jUN 171983 pSA N P141 14G DEPT. June 15, 1983 Mr. .Frank Tepedino, President Tigard Planning Commission P.O. Box. 23397. • Tigard, OR 9.7223 Dear Mr. Tepedino: This is to notify the Planning .Commisslon that the Home Builders Association will not testify on the draft community. development code at the June 21 public hearing. The code has just been released and we received our copy today., June 15. That does. not leave enough time for me or our interested members to review the document and to reach consensus -on changes before the first hearing. We definitely intend to testify at the July 12 hearing. Bythat time, we :should also have been able .to meet with city staff to .reach tentative .agreement on as many of our concerns as possible._..;. We are .delaying our testimony until July 12 so that our time and the Commission's is used most efficiently. Sincerely, Kevin L. anwa Staf1: Attorney CC: W,Iliala -Moho han Mayor----Wil].. Bishop Gary •Reid Tigard . Oregon. 97'23 • June 1, 1983• RECEIVED Mr. William Monahan. Tigard Planning Director & Staff JUN 2198 Tigard Planning Commission CITY OF TIGARD Tigard City Council City of 'Tigard Tigard. Oregon, 97223. Dear Mr. . Monahan and Staff: We are writing this letter in reference to the Tigard Community Development Code which is to be discussed by you and your Staff and The Planning Commission at a meeting on June7. 1983. at Fowler Junior High School at 7: 30 P. M. We are requesting that Day Care or Child Care Centel notbe allowed in established low density single family residential neighborhoods. For the past three months . our neighborhood has been deprived of its serenity, quietness and character because of such a Day Care facility operating out of a rental house in our cul-de=sac. The owners of the property are incurring severe damage to their front and back yards and the inside of their house. This incident has caused unnecessary noise with cars coming and going from early morning until ater 6 P.M. My husband and I find it difficult to sleep and I have had to purchase ear plugs to enjoy our backyard' because of the excessive noise from all the children. Our neighbors and ourselves bought our single family homes in a low density residential area to getaway from the noise and conjestion of density living. We are citizens and taxpayers.An the City of Tigard and would appreciate your consideration to eliminate Day Care Centers or similar facilities from established low density single family residential neighbor- hoods in the new Tigard Community Development Code. . Also, our property is adjacent or across the street from the Central Business District within the T.U.R.A. boundary and we understand that a step-down code will be used to protect our neighborhood from high density development allowed within the C.B.D. and T.U.R.A. boundaries . If a 25% build-up is allowed when property is in the Flood Plain. density would be a3lowed to the developer. We are requesting that the Tigard Community Development Code be specific and state that only duplexes and/or sinele family_ attached dwellings be allowed as a buffer between low density single family homes in the establised neighborhoods adjacent the T.U.R.A. Special Zone within the Central Business District. Thank you for your consideration, Si cerely yo rs Paul and oriaeJohnson' 9300 S. W, Hill Street Tigard, Oregon, 97223 . ..-, J fir, v�NN,c1G D�p�. JE /� BAKER June 2, 1983 )?v iREALTY CONANY • Mr. William Monahan _ City of Tigard Director of Planning & Development P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Monahan: In reference to our conversation this morning, I would like to request that the City of Tigard allow Day Care Centers in all commercial zones. Presently, the Community Development Code reads that Day Care is allowed in some residential zones as a conditional use, but not in any commercial zones. The Day Care group that I represent, Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc. , typically build schools to accomodate 100 to 150 children. As we discussed, a facility of this size would create traffic problems in a residential neighborhood. I have checked the zoning ordinances and found that Day Care Centers are an out- right use in the following communities: Portland, Gresham, Vancouver, Beaverton, Tualatin, and in Multnomah, Washington and Clark Counties. Since Tigard is in the process of reviewing their Community nvestigate Development Codes, now might be an appropriate the feasability of including Day Care Centers as an outright use in all commercial zones. Sincerely yours, JIM BAKER REALTY CO. 1750 sw skyline blvd portland,oregon 97221 503 292 0761 Mark E. Baker MEB/db PHONE 286-1611 SEATTLE TACOMA PORTLAND STOCKTON r7 B OAKLAND T T 1 Z '®' 1L CONAPANY /_.. SAN PEDRO V t LOS ANGELES • l ET Y6 12005 N. BURGARD, P. O. BOX 03117, ST.JOHNS"STA _N ` X7203 GASOLINE 1 • .�l-wl fJ � 1 . CITY OF T IGAI-(D PLANNING DEPT. June 21, 1983 City Council d Planning Cu.amission City of Tigard Re: Additional uses in M-3 Zone Location: 15900 S.W. Upper Boone6 Ferry Rd. Gentlemen: Time Oil Co. wishes to include a mini-market and deli operation slung with our fuel sales in your M-3 zone. Our company feels that such an operation would compliment the area needs. We would like to ivite the City Council and Planning Commission to inspect one of our present locations. We operate a very clean fuel and convenience store operation. Please contact me if you would be interested in looking at our operation. Sincerely, 1 Wes Meacham Property Manager 14MI r p �MAM CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. both Portli:n;.:, �r�gon y7�19 Jane 17, 1383 i t u •"i_ �.4' �, ion _, r n n: to Jail V1J_1 r is tiiv cice X0:11:1` v_ic Gs'i5 iG' 1�t: is-'n 'Ia ale tva t cif is T'_ ll-..-lay.? � 1 5oS::l it«i t y c� ' iU .__ Ct i ll1� t i i L i i c r NORRIS, B EGGS & SIMPS©N 720 S.W.WASHINGTON STREET. PORTLAND 97205•(503) 223-7181 May 12, 1983 Mr. Bill Monahan Director of Planning & CITY OF I-IGAHD Development PLANNING DEPT. City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, OIR 97223 Dear Mr. Monahan: On behalf of Farmers Insurance Group, owner of approximately 17 acres of undeveloped land located in the Tigard Triangle, we would like to point out the omission of a hotel use under the Commercial Professional zone. We apologize that we did not notice its exclusion earlier and hope that the final zoning codes will make provision in appropriate locations for such use. We would like to stress that we are currently discussing our location with a national hotel group, thus our belief in the need and demand for hotels in the Tigard Triangle is real rather 1 than conceptual. Referring to City of Tigard Ordinance #78-9 which outlined neighbor- hood goals and policies to be considered for incorporation into the comprehensive plan, the ordinance states that there are 108 acres in the Tigard Triangle potentially designated for Commercial Professional developnant and that the intent would be to attract a sizable suburban office park complex. Quoting from Page 9, "The office park complex will require supporting land uses such as eating and convention facilities. These ancillary uses should be located on an individual permit request basis." On Page 10, Policy 26, "Within the office park areas, supportive uses such as eating, entertainment, motel and convention facilities are conditional uses subject to the finding of the Planning Commission that compatibility with adjacent development is assured and there is a need within the office park area for the proposed use." With the improvement of the 72nd Avenue interchange and the recent start of construction of the improvement of the Haines Road overpass, the potential for attracting a major hotel to the Tigard Triangle has been vastly improved. The access from both Highway 217 and I-5, the scope of surrounding office land, the absence of abutting residentially zoned property and the hub location of the Triangle in suburban Portland create an area that is ideal for such a use. PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO DAN JOSE SACRAMENTO HONOLULU TACOMA LOS ANGELES Mr. Bill Monahan May 12, 1983 Page 2 We ask that prior to final adaptation of the zoning codes that will accompany the new comprehensive plan, you reazsess hotel use in the Commercial Professional zone within the Tigard Triangle as a permutable use. We also ,ask that sufficient flexibility be provided for in design to allow a density that will permit construction and operation of such a facility to be economically feasible. Perhaps these issues could be controlled by the site, facility and design review process. Farmers Insurance Group has had an excellent relationship with the City of Tigard and are proud to be a part of your community. Our interest in and comm to the City of Tigard is obviously long term and we want to cooperate with the Planning Department in every possible way. If you have any questions that we can answer regarding our request, we would look forward to meeting with you. Sincerely, i NORR.IS, BEGGS $ SIMPSON J. Vi a esident t i DO/jm/20 ' cc: Mr. Graham K. Ritchie Director of Real Estate Investments f Farmers Insurance Group i Dennis O'Neill Norris, Beggs & Simpson ! I I i` { 4 i F i I �FF Y. Sunday, June 24, 1983 Dear Mr. Monahan: City of Tigard Planning Director: Copies to Council.-Planning Commission-HPO's Subj: Accessory Buildings Thank you for forwarding on to me a 1979 Edition on Group M, Division I information. May I now, at this time, within a few days, receive from you Section 103 Appendix Chapter 11 for agricultural buildings (Exception: Where applicable). Noted in your June 21st letter reference to private garages, carports, sheds and agricultural buildings come under MI noting these types of structures are permitted in residential areas. How does our current Comprehensive Plan address R10-R7 zoning agriculture 4 pole metal buildings with galvanized roof requiring no on site inspection exce gt when adding electricity a State of Oregon license is required? From the information furnished me accessory buildings may be 300' with 10' height (300' being ground floor area). "Barns" showing F100' ground floor area and ore story (is one story 30'-25'-20°-15'-12' or less?) on one acre? The Planning Dir. shall review plans and make conditions on site review-for accessory buildings over 120' . Sites under 120' or agricultural buildings do not require on site inspections? In your letter you state "the City is not proposing to establish any type of architectural design review related to any structurd". Note in the proposed Comprehensive Plan no materials are in language form for R7-R10 or any other zoing? Egress and ingress , if needed, is addressed during the initial review of an accessory structure proposal plan. This review does not include accessory "barns-agriculture buildings"? What about materials on agriculture accessory buildings "whereas galvanized metal roof will either be painted brown, or will be reroofed with shake shingles or other acceptable roofing materials in estabUhhed neighborhoods to retain the character of the area? Example: The City of Tigard irrl982 without notice to adjacent home owner's issued a permit #3318 for "MI storage" Yet it has been used as a full gar&ge complete with Mlrailer pickup and electrical machinery contrary to the intent of the permit being storage" agriculture designation was indicated and there is no on site inspection in this established R10 neighborhood (the Deed Restriction was ignored)? Gravel roads were created for "barn" egress and -ingress. According to your recent letter the Director shall "review" accessory sites but no language on roads exists, nor materials? Permit #3318 indicates a height of 12' yet the "agriculture barn" sits 18' high on the lot and measured 24'3" length and 2415" width and having a galvanized shiny roof adding 5' to height! No on site inspection having been classified "agricultural storage?". During my research on the Legislative intention of no on site inspection for agricultural accessory buildings the State of Oregon farmer's asked for an "emergency" structure and so this exception on agricultural buildings was created with limited use in certain zones. Your June 24 letter confirms: "According to the Uniform Building Code all structures, except agricultural buildings as defined by ORS, over 120 square ft. are required to complete an on site inspection". Under 18.139.030 D: The Dir. shall approve, approve with conditions or deny any application for an accessory use of structure. The Dir. shall apply the standards set forth in Sec. 18.130-150 of this Code when reviewing an apolication for a variance. 18.139-030 E-1: The applicant may request a hearing .before the Commission if the action of the Dir. is to deny or to approve with conditions. My question is during the process 30 days PRICR to applicant's original request mailed notices be given to owner's of record within 100' so that one is informed on his neighbor's intent and how it will affect his property. (We never reco any notice?) Seems as though only when the app3Ticant t. does not agree with Dir. conditions or approval may he appeal to the Commission? Why: is all this power given solely to the Planning Air.-? 18-139-03OF2- Allowing Chairpersons of an official recognized neighborhood Planning Organization, if the property which is the subj. of the application lies wholly or partially within the boundaries of such organization notice? This Cede provision has 'faults' as currently areas have not been contacted by the NPO Chairperson having f QEAIIOZ CONSUMNI5 L) July 5., 1983 JUL 8. 1983 :1 I- CITY,0F.kd-TIOARD 1�r• 8 .11`�•�®n��an.. .t _ ?iF i'Xaaa. h -Vlkectos Tigard ®R 97223 Dear Mr_. Monihan, I.`,certai.hly enjoyed talking' .to .you on the phone and looilc.1forward meEtiriq:youn they fuf:ure. 'Iii�-tregards to <our conversation :concerriing.`-the: .89 acre parcel o£ land which is currently land- !-lock' d,gietween-:Art:Verharen's 2.55. acre parcel and.°the Geneeal Motors property, I would ask -that you consider the 'following: A. The .89 .acre parcel..was purchased from s ttie•:rState �iq$iway .Dept.. in -:Jul0 -:July of 1981 :The Stat6 j. .4s 2ieen a ayment . n.the. ,propertyy since° tt .•�,�,•.. n ..� �e - U d�se• e.-NM' ia�asi�xa`� fir-�--z. 1 'ai3•'� -. ''-.. w-:i: r u�:- t.r„ .i ~•.^ ti l� C.�'` : a`4c�-{}�.. v� ^i Z �:� �.` c: 't+'^'tt >•ri_ :�e i i 3i ^#- �a�t.rft:•,G ':: - .. 'r`'4 •} N _,s`. AL3,,•.rd,• �: . yr ;'ever one's:Yaes 'interest to "see> he city_s based'de an is .: ull po enti.alt „Thas , x : rr� t developeii'could'4d s rr�.f cant]: p.,: ...��.5. P. E y '. . .i: y t;o i��*ax:base. Because-.1.of its current `zoning=of Comm 're .cial/professional . and its freeway- v3.sibility. it -has. great potential. for development in conjunction with Mr:. 'Verharen•s property. C, I would'. like .you to consider . putting::a provision in the Community Development Code similar to .tPie. State o :Oregoia's "statutory...way. of necessi ty ,which. - `st8te si ` a County Board- of•.Commis signersj� an p$tnpitess : . a e semen over- one ;private©�tner .to.'open �cGess� to < q Z.jnd_3_xocked parcel- of aeiother pr�vat�,:. arty. perhaps'another idea might be* * that any fiiture develop- ment 6f Mr. Verharen's property be subject� to proper access -to the -89 acre parcel. As _I mentioned- over the -phone; I believe there may be- some precedent for this type of requirement in Clackamas County. Page 1 of 2 m7o S.W.padrmW Po Boor ym W&orwWe.LKeQM 97670 C53>hes-3076 Page 2 { There are probably many other questions to be answered, so please feel gree to contact. .me either at home or at the office. I want to thank you for your consideration in this- manner. Sincerely, Geoff Petrie . . GP/lt Enclosure l • .Y i, 70 S.�P PO BfluC 751lsatwili�.C2ieQa7 X7070 1343)682-3076 D VY Complements of vrn5ltit�GTON Etscaw'f Y -yOR :G0�1 SAEECO TfPLE INSURANCE C01,+tPAMf � 297-4441 SCALE I ta! SEE MAP I �� . '4 ti• Is 1.. 36 _c® • .wf•®�•�• ' _ a0�•'as'v may. •-ate•f• asaem 4 em.a.•f ta4 a•$ awea �• t ga•� 100 3®® .AOn I zst�s r56Ac :. l z5Ac- czpw .0 w � o 7j. • 1. A, lk 1-,-. 1_ ' h• ` �,.�iYt.\�� •�.._ y` _ 67- S2 . � a e beS•.ab ve Cjr •O f6e a!=— � so f OCe9f•♦ _ efT •. n , r •��a P _ a s � f• ® ate\e c' ' at% � \� ` it -� d• Vi e Ali �tOa e.� • 0• � ��\sem •/ • e �e 9 i Governmental Restraints on 1'riv>,__ Ownership Rights l " '-J Udder the "allodicl system,"recognized in the United States, which permits private parties the right to own title to real property, the title holder has a myriad of rights of ownership. However, there aze certain rights which government possesses which are a restraint upon the freedom of the private ' landowner. 1: Eminent Dornain—thin is the power of any governmental body to claim private property for a public purpose. This is accomplished through the process known as condemnation. When such ..-,< occurs, the private owner must be paid just compensation which CaP consist of the fair market ` vilud of the rictus!property taken plus severance#amagcs for the diminished value of any remnant ; kP.props Oregon, the- weS'of'eminent domain by statute,sari be used b a railroad or private uti'Yity 1, tom ati ''to uirr :g"ai t of wa casesrien for extending rai'lsoad � •� 4 �' .y `' y g track* or an rlcctriC r r �4•+ ,s-+�,1 line'° off'-LI3C °fatltt��0 wa O YreCesStl 0° + pOWCr �,�:�:• �, . : ' .�: � y',.f tY .process.whereby ai Coin and of Co , •.Can irIIt rc an C33e Tr. .s. ,r= T e cess to the landloeke el of `ario"thee;' arty xs:BEs=ictehsioas'isf".the o of.eniirj�h�:d main: 2#..,:1°® Qe_r .gwcr;—e8'; .o'n " t"o �OVG Cn -ta.G a Y.. -- ., . r1ac r.aSRn Q.controC4 I�CCetaary f0� tFie'hea�tls."rx gy s z cy safct . �n-elfars.or.Mo -of .sogGtY a whole. Such powers haimpose,ia o=ed"res >r ' landowrsers in'tlie',f o ' P �aulf,:oyer`ppyat`e.A - pf zoning lawsland other land use controls,streetaccess 1i - -bops;;' , r 4 s enviraptnGntal"resttafnts and the like."' In .Oregon, does t have the authority from the Oregon Legislature to zone roe once.1919 Counties were �. P rtY r� a .3, grapted•Piu�h6rity.ii; 1947 arid.iii",x.969; the state entered a local Zo ` '4 ,-r 4 by corapeIlilig'Ioca1 !lasses:of government to.create Com eh ninQ,process .y , . ..s etrs-sve Prams.as'overall f ` Hand,else aari�,develpprrn:erak-In 197$,Senate Bl11 1 0 QRS Cha o guidelines far Ater 197)�ereated the.L&nd t,onseav ?w anti Di*olopmcn, Commission with the ciu , ' t�3c?tFF m r iY t4 create start-wide plannin $ d to" t csnpel units to f0Uow sucl;"giii¢eliries, 8 gui elirie a T fs kbi :uP° i .PoIi�cy"pgwer of"govetrnnerie which permits laws and regtalitions wha hail.reason ne rd protect`=the pgiblic health';"safefy,.welfare or morals.:To be valid iii most con-". .,�arsfs. Flie>p blit' and . . _ y 4 ; 1 ltse con�ol8 itiiist be reasoaiabl�' not dttciiiri' to # "' •, - +.t ,.� Nmtyai..a ` n z.,. _ ' c:• Q ,iced ,... {,-notr�sors fi��dtory (however= a'zoning ordinance (which is' casonaliTe: : " :�'e?�:i J Qi suFfe s' doll i otl f ; lilt cs T a� °Oaf sirens =t, r r- r N., ible".t0 usa'.thc arc 11fQ A. _ },. c r.rsa �lf• k!,4! •.z. .t•: que tie fi,� 4e�� ki K' #mss"� t#M-I s , eta'it.'co a �40a 1 row. P. Pc:. cam` zse of Ore gra ead'3'rca ,_ . n • }� anidtor.zopin$ Pro. ori:�s in s ffect - '• o anon ych so ioris''.Wer�``: ..Iandowncr.atla prep ' r "" ` t - P , ucli'to oc r;tl�e governmerital body may,fie t f olatitig;o+ ; in`continuin �suc rise t .-� . t to_cnjoira g . g: h r °yep to,c extent that a;violatir s" ctUr on the'=, parted be'reset ed,'Shpuld"thG " av $ P +..,. 8 cnnmentzil body fail",to act, a private gtiieis"of = t;fisdicpoa%' " � �r gtvoivaci inky` seise the litigation:Criminal penalties against the violator';nay also e`cxacted ui` 'tie appropriate ::. Y ' - r �: larC-exisd"J Non-4F9 0rmrrng UiC i 7 T it s_ v_ ct P An cxcc tsars '_y„n ; ,, p the_aboYG statement exists�Htt the in:tancc..where a-landowner. as`'" in a iris $"fie a . , g P.. �v, r ..:•. wa `pnii ,ta the_enactrr}cn� of the zo;ung or comprehensive code prohili iopa.:TliEsis_ 'Y�t'x', ` dui-to- a prints le of American law Jlaat prohibitions in law cannot be retraactively� plied°_: us •'` E '�-�`� P�. such a lasidower�.has a.``grarxdfathe 's right" to continue the pec-existing even in conforms, 4th tg� with the change m the law.'Ire most jurisdictions; howevei, such`ri`lid is ©nI fi_ Esc C; to,contique,not tp.Gxpind,such pre-ckisdng:usc,Whets',',wood-frame'daiiry earn on'p o G liaed as.it dairy:bef6ra g ionc char a Eo:!'residential uje o « ' .•.� �- .,;t; nly`.,could be repaired but vat reconstructed £; .:. witls concrete`black'Con: 8 tfiiction o� any other construction technique which lengthened the nor rnal econom;c pfe_-of the_structure�•In•some jurisdictions,.a prc4xisting use structure which is destroyed by fire or other casualty cannot be.rebuilt. t i, Variances, oval Usc Permiti,and Zone(manges Under Oregon layv •a`variance is a zegdcsr of-'a landowner to use property cover to , :�• mitted use due to unusual hardshipimposed on the specific tract by the zoning code. or x '•. :.. .: �.. ... ".a parcel in a "residential use onlYarea may have no practical possibility for residential use that bG== : cause it abuts a busy hi hwa yrt -•:} 8 y. The governme tal body request'and find.' .i?f y may weigh the t .;y•. 2. Non-Freehold Estates These interests are held by those who rent or lease property and are a mere personal prop- erty interest sometimes called a chattel.-al a. Estate for Years. An interest or estate in land for a fixed period of time,such as a year a month, or week. Usually created by a lease,with the owner of an estate in land trans- fcrring use of the land to another person in payment for rent. By so doing, the owner relinquishes his right to occupy the land for the period of the lease. The tenant, in turn, has agreed to pay rent for this period.The tenant does not own the land but has acquired a leasehold estate. A modern and better title of this interest is an estate for a stated term. si b. Estates fromPeriod to Period: These continue (rocas one dftnatcd period.6f timgto another (year to year, month lo month, etc.) and automatiSally renew until one Party I s gives.the other the proper notice of temunationfi . ,t r C. Estates at Will: This is a tenancy created with the consent of the landlord,intend4d-to continue for an indefinite period of time. It may be created by express agreement or by operation of.law. A tenancy at will is created when a teiant enters into possession under.an agreement for the execution a lease for a spCcific time,but the lAse is never reduced to writing. Courtq have m'-d at, where a tenant goes into posscssidn.of a property under a lease ah. :d is never executed,a tenancy at will exists. :. d. Estates at Sufferance: Where a month-to-month tenant stays on the.prcmises.(iiftcr proper notice to vacate has been served), or if a lessee holds over after the expiration of a lease, we.have an "estate at sufferance." It is not really an estate inland as the tenant is rongfully.withholding possession of the property and may be legally evicted at the w 4, landlord's demand. N®n=Posaes�diy:yiitet3`Which-Are Not Estates in d:�nd•- "Soitt~e non-posse-socq-interests f r•a 4 :.' ' arc regded as an inco orcal interest in real property onlyanfthus Provides.the*holderr a mere.limited right to use property of another.These arc not cd'Etsidered as estates in land: An The common types of such non-possessory and non-estate interesits include:.. .. a. Easements ,F *Right to use another's property. *Irrevocable by the Grantor. 1. Appurtenant _= *benefitting a.specific parcel of property. *benefitted parcel called Dominant Estate or Tenement -� *subjected parcel called Subservient Estate or Tenement *BENEFIT ALWAYS CONVEYED WITH TITLE TO DOMINANT ESTATE .� 2. In Gross *not benefitting a specific parcel of property. *personal right to grantee. *n errable, exce P or commercial easements in gross which, because of ink'st=em an neccssatY,are transferrable. b. Licenses *Limited privilege to use another's land *Revocable at 'will of landowner. EXC I N where enation aid, not to revoke withotit stated cau c. o tt a Pcndre *Right to take part of soil (gravel, minerals. oil; gas, etc.) or products from land (crops,etc.) 19 P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES INCORPORAT[O 1590 WOODLAND TERRACE LAKE OSWEGO.OREGON 97034 Telephone 503 - 636.2523 April 29, 1983 D.J.B. Inc. 1151S S.W. 91st Ave. Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Drainage Study, D.J.B. Inc. Property Within S.E. % Sec. 36, TIS, R1W and N.E. 4 Sec. 1, T2S, R1W Gentlemen: At your request I have conducted a reconnaissance survey of D.J.B. Inc. properties adjacent to the Landmark Ford Agency on S.W. 66th Avenue. Purpose of the investigation is to determine the source and disposition of surface waters within the area, especially in relationship to the proposed construction of the I-5 Haines Interchange. The natural surface drainage at the D.J.B. Inc. property is southwester- ly. Over the years the drainage has been modified to accomodate develop- ment and improvements. At the present time, surface runoff from the east side of I-S is carried beneath I-5 and S.W. 66th Avenue to`a drainage way which flows westerly immediately north of the D.J.B. Inc. property. Some of the runoff is carried by storm sewer and ditches from areas be- yond the natural surface drainage. On April 21st, 1983, I discussed the i future drainage plan with the Oregon Department of Transportation survey crew working at the Haines Interchange site. The party chief informed me that the plan is to channel the runoff parallel to I-5 to the I-S - Highway 217 Interchange. y i t The distribution of surface water on the D.J.B. Inc. property as of April 21st is shown on the enclosed map. The small area of saturated soil in s s _ Y } GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY -2- the northern part of the property is surface runoff along the drainage way which receives it's flow from east of I-S. The larger area of satur- ated surface soil is caused by a septic tank failure and possibly other waters from the Landmark Ford Agency. In summary, the D.J.B. Inc. property, historically was not an area of wet- lands. The problem of poor drainage and soil saturation in a limited area t are the product of changes in land-use over the past 20 to 25 years. I will be available for further assistence on an as-needed basis. 4 Respectfully, i ,SftT!F/FD OREGON 'Y AUL YL HUGHES Paul W. Hughes, i Eta `' F Engineering Geologist � /A1G Goy ---• I PWH/ah �. Encl. r t t E E f_' rr! fV.Y t k J� _iP r-I�r _a��Jt_y �.�t C. ECP-.ILL ♦ �4 i 7 I I G'C'Ji-E.&,�.T if • � I � I�II.�r Zy.E ni 34157E 1001�r.� w �c �iLn 1 J CPT. t�y, I •3�• F7C�ET� s` FFP;-*r n � d j chime•. ,r rr_r: i-=—r-, •n• _ �, ._. • � Ek Ir P. W. HUGHES At Aig=IAT '1590 M....00ILAND LAKE OSWEGO,OREG Telephone 503 June 6, 1983 . e D.J.B. Inc. 11515 S.W. 91st Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 � Ree Development Suitability, D.J.B. Property `fit Adjacent vacated S.W. Dartmouth Between S.W. 66th $ 68th Tigard, Oregon Gentlemen: As requested, I have expanded upon my original investigation to determine if any of the property fails within the category of Sensitive Lands, as defined in Chapter 18.57, City of Tigard Comprehensive Flan. ' Sensitive lands are those Potentially unsuitable for ocvelopment because •. -of 1.) location -within.-.the 100-y;ear floodplain, 2.) within a• natural •drain- =* ageway, or 3.) on steep slopes. The property does not lie within a lowland nor adjoins a water course or body of water which has or may be covered by floodwaters, and therefore, not within any floodplain. Chapter 18.57 defines drainagea'ays "as those areas which convey signrfi,-n-or seasonal concentrations of water over the surface of the land." The term - "drainageway" is not used in the Handbook of Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, or other available texts. I assume the term as stated refers to both Chan- nel or sheet flooding. neither of which takes place on the property. . Finally, steep slopes are defined as "portions of the ground surface %= which f g_ ;.t •',,; .}�/fes_ •;��y;�� y�*c.. � �• •-.�t. .:,� t GEOE OGy -2- have a slope of twelve percent or greater". Slope, normal to the contours across the D.J.B. property, measured on the Lake Oswego 7.5 minute Geolog- ical Survey Quadrangle sheet, indicates vertical elevation difference of- 45 f45 feet within a horizontal distance of 650 feet, which is a 7% slope. i It is apparent that the D.J.B. Property is not within a sensitive zone as = °+ defined. T x,-ill he available for further atsi-,t(,nce on an as needed basis. Y' i` Respec t ft:l 1 V, Paul 11. Hughes, , Engineering Geologist cc: Fred Anderson OREGON\\•.1 r P..Ui r, H." . Attornev-at-La 'i` � Tigard, Oregon 97223 f a . �ra1P y• fir• P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED 1590 WOODLAND TERRACE LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 97034 Telephone 503 — 636-2523 July 12,- 1983 Mrs. Geraldine Ball 11515 S.W. 91st Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Development Suitability Tax Lots 5700, 6300, 6500 $ 6600; 23-81 Tigard 1S. 1 36DD Dear Mrs. Ball: I have examined the referenced lots to determine if any of the property falls within the category of Sensitive Lands, as defined in Chapter 18.S7 City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Sensitive lands are those potentially unsuitable for development because of 1.) location within the• 100-year floodplain, 2.) within a natural drainage- way, or 3.) on steep slopes. Your property is not within the 100-year floodplain nor is it located on a steep slope (greater than 12%) . The center line of a drainageway does, how- ever pass through the northern edge of Tax Lots 6300 and 6600. I question whether this is a natural drainage. Water in the drainage is transported from properties east of Interstate 5 by culverts beneath I-5, S.W. 66th and 68th Avenues. It appears to be a man-made drainage. It is my understanding that all surface runoff will be carried southward, parallel and adjacent to S.W. 68th Avenue which will serve as the approach to the south-bound on-ramp at the new Tigard Interchange. c GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY -2- Upon completion of the Tigard Interchange, all surface water runoff will be channeled to the Public Right-of-way; and your property will therefore not be within the -sensitive -Lands" catagory. Respectfully, ctiPTIFl- Paul W. Hughes, CWAEWN Vit[.NKCHES Engineering Geologist /w PWH/ah nfN. t s i f 9 i , s a { , r f E s i t F i P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES INCORrONATCO 1590 WOODLAND TERRACE LAKE OSWEGO.OREGON 97034 Telephone 503 — 636.2523 July 12, 1983 DJB Inc. 11515 S.W. 91st Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Ground Water Levels Vicinity of D.J.B. Inc. Property Tigard -I-5 Interchange Gentlemen: At your request 1 have examined the water well reports, on file with the State Water Resources Department in Salem, in order to determine the depth to ground water in the area surrounding your property. The source of ground water is from local precipitation which infiltrates downward and laterally in a southwesterly direction. The aquifers are located at several horizons between lava flows or within fractures which have developed within individual lava flows. The enclosed water well reports are representative of ground water depths adjacent your property. The depth to ground water varies from 49 feet to greater than 500 feet below the land surface. Ground water beneath your property is estimated to be at depths which will not hinder any potential development. Respectfully, ,� _- L / aor t✓ /f� ✓ of s HUG PAUL W.HUGNfS Paul W. Hughes, �✓ "' E18 Engineering Geologist 0 Rf1J a �,��\• PW/ah GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY o_ Ir D _ WATER WELL REPORT R Lr. �"' �' State Well No. ..:.....I. ,.r....................Z. STATE OF OREGON JUN 8 1983 liIATER RESOURCES OM. State Permit No. ....................................... SALZM. Ora::r 3 (1) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL: Name John and '.-orie-i Ko a.s C Count Clackamas Drillerswellnurrtber —8 Address hh05 S.7 Redondo SE V.Ifif V.Section T. 2S R lE W.M. Citv $ortlard State OR97231 Tax Lot 0 Lot Blk Subdivision - Address a-well location: 13107 S':Y ROd-ers Rd. (2) TYPE OF WORK(check): 10ortland. Ore-cn Now Well M • Deepening❑ Reconditioning fJ Abandon❑ (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed WelL If abandonment describe material and procedure in Item 12 at which water was Crit found —r>t 2 (8) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): static teve! 1 rt below land surteoe.Date 5-6--3 Rotary Air O Driven O Dogmatic 2q L•rdustrial O Municipal O Artesian pressure lbs.per square inch.Data Rotary Mud 7 Dug O brisatim O Test Well O 00wr O 6«.a O Thtn.ml: withdrawal O Rninoctim O (12) WELL LOG-- Diameter of well below easing.............................. Depth drilled 555ft- Depth cf completed well 555 ft. (5NICASING INSTALLED: Steel ID Plastic ❑ Formation:Describe color,texture,grain size and structure of materials:and show g 1- Threaded ❑ Welded Z§ thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,with at least one entry ......6...-Di.f..i:)I 1S...I ft to-5)m.......ft Gauge •.2.50..................... for each and of formation.Report each change in position of Static Water Level I.........:'Diam from...............ft to...............ft. Gauge and indicate principal water-bearing strata. Jr�° PWER INSSV IL MATeIuwL From To SL • O 21 5 am.from �-36 ...ft W-5,55.....ft Gauge x13.8............. C1=Y==�1. -�f rotor ?ori—,7 a r 21 1L' (6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? fa Yes ❑NoCinders-"-d 152 Type of perforator used To C^ r 1 r Sire of perforations 1 8 in b it o - � 1 165, 178 ••�� Clay- -s - .......................................l.........perforations from.7 K 7......ft W...............ft V„ - - '1 - 178 292 ...................................................perforations from...............ft W...............ftQlnv-e r' _ :7 292 297 ..................... perforations from...............ft W...............ft Cls t lue 291 V3 (7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yes M No Qia�[---ray 2231 Manufacturer's Name .................................................................................... C12 -S}•j -Lan 1 T),Te ........................................................................ Model No...................... (; -: of R J 15 417 Dian. ........................ Slot Slee............Set from...............fLto................ft- S[?glo-� n 117 - Diam. ........................ .Slot Sizr-............Set from...............ft to..I I****I*I I=1t. v._ P 3 L4(3 (8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered C 1 a Granular-br o m 11}=8 Ll'11 • below static level 077 Was a pump test made? ❑Yes i$No If yes by whom? l a-r-!:'ra ll nr-"brown IL97 532 r r galJnrin.with ft drawdown atter hrs. (�` n p 7 1 1 Air test ltaUrnin.with drill stem at ft hrs. Bailer test 20 rralJmin with 226ft.drawdownafter 1 hrs. Artesian flow a P m• - =".ratureofwater 53 Depth artesian flowenrnuntered............ft. Work started L-2? 14 33 Completed 5-7 1933 (9) CONSTRUCTION: Special standards: Yes3M No❑ Date well drilling machine moved off of well Well seal Material used Vie;+9-nt- ;'!At4e................................................. Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: Well sealed from land surface to.......................144......................................ft This was cons undeW direct su rvision.l dat2riabt used 10 and info on re abo a to knowledge and helief. Diameter of well bore W bottom of seal.....................in Diameter of well bore below seat..............6.....in. Ing (Signed) "- Date 5A......11�3.... Number of sacks of cement used in well seal ...............................51......... sacks Drilling Machine Operator's License No. ....... oR............................... How was cement,grout placed? 'Q;,1J:Z,'-..r3....t!=�9� Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to .................................................................................................................... the best of my knowledge and belief. �StV ptrrnpinatnlled?.. ....................Type............iiP............Depth............ft a�C9 @•l1 d ST"T� R� • P?In a drive shoe used? 0Yes 0N Plugs. Na1ne... .............t...., orcon�...F......��.....+.i+r......... ..r.pe or riot t. ..'.......Size:location............ft (Peraor4firmaraoryorationl nS'W rioI' r r1Vr. ,':. w3u1.-i a OR...a 22 Bid any strain contain unusable water'! ❑Yea �T No Address J ..... t..............1..,..... :.1::......... Type of Water? depth of strata �xz ib[ethod o[sealin,2 strata of (Signed) /�• •.• Ve11 1- Was well gravel pocked? f]Yea r(•Io Size o[gravel...................... Contractors Licemse No........Z.....Date.................SSR.............103. Gravel placed form........................ft.W........................ft NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRACTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. The original and firsi oopr of this report r O N t'rf3lo A— ale a+. ►><s►-.� ..��.. ../�_.;,...... STATE OF OREGON APR 6 1983 State Permit No. ....................................... PLEASE TYPE orWWYE fV0URCES DEPT. ---- (10) LOCA t ION Or LL: OWNER: Clackamas prillerswelanurnber John edlund c°°"`� H Name SE v, NW V.Section 6 T. 2 W R. 1 E• W.M. Address 2 40 S. W. B i rd s h i l l LOOP Tax Lot s t oc glk Subdivision City Portland. Orel�On 972tig- Address at wellltx�tion (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Wel0a Deepening O Reconditioning C3Ate "❑ (I1) WATER LEVEL: Completed Well. If abandonment.describe material and procedure in Item 12. 1 25 fL Depth at wlueh water watt first found Static level /83 (g) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): 40 tt below land t�iar�eainrh.Date Date 4/4 DuoKstle )C)C WustrW O Municipal O Artesian pwmryAlt a Dr9vart o O Tat wall o Oder O bat RatarpMud o �s O fn;satfa+ ........ a Boca 0 l�reer,tal: Withdrawal O Reinisctlon 0 (Z2) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below twang ...................... De drilled 200 tt of completed well 17 5 ft. Plastic xx n size and structure of materials:and show (5) CASING INSTALLED: Steeladed o welded XX Form tion.Describe color.texture.grafi _ thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetin rated.itionwith tatic Water'a el PVC=200............. for each change of formation.Report each change .6...'Diem.from=...t1......ft to.......�Q...ft. Gauge -• and indicate principal water-bearing strata. ............Diam.from...............ft to...............ft. Gauge RITo SwL MATERIAL From LINER INSTALLED: 175...rc. cauQe .PVC.-200_____.•.... Brown cls -occ.rocl: fru cots 0 6 4...-Diam.from.......r�......ft to........... Gra -brown boulders & rock 6 (6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? N Yes o No Gra -brown basalt fractured 9 22 of perforatorused Drill hard Size or perforations 3/8" in.VY diameter in- grown basalt dirt occ.soft 22 25 ..........................1?q...........perforationsfrom..115......ttto..� 75.....ft. Black-brown basalt & lava ...................................... perfomtionafrom...............ft-to...............ft coarse rained 25 40 .................... perforationsfrom...............ft.to..I............rL Black basalt odd. dirt brow 40 80 01 SCREENS: well a ven installed? ❑Yes ®No streaks &t,ctufzcturer i Name ................................................. .... .•-.......................... Red-brown & black basalt stye ks80 Model No.•.................... Gray basaltz. hard coarse 95 155 w.b. Diam. ........................ Slot Size............Set from...............fLto...............ft- grained Diam ...... SictSize............Set from--------------ftto...............ft. Red cls & cls stone 170 200 DrawdaRtr is amount water leer l is lowered Brown Cl a --S t Ck (8) WELL TESTS: below static level +s a um test made? ❑Yes XXNo If ves.by whom? f 1 7 gaUmin with 129 ft drawdown after 2 rr Air test IJmin.with drill tstert at ft. hrs. Bailer ealimi..with fL drawdown after hrs. ian flaw m 4/4/83 19 Work started 83 19 Com leted ��'e ttperature of water Depth artesian now encountered............ft. 4/4/83 19 al standards: Yes rJ No Al Date well drng machine moved oft of well (9) CONSTRUCTION: Sped applicable): emeCl-t -•gCOUk .....--.--••--.. (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification (if Well seal—Material used ...........C...... . used ft This well was co above under my direct supervision.Materials Well sealed from land surface to...............5.0.................................................ttt f and information reported above are true tom best knowledge and belief. ......in. to 25 r 850 i Date...................19......... Diameter of well bore to bottom or seal 1.0...... [Signed] "-""""- ................................................. Diameter of well bore below seal........... in Number of sacks of cement usediawellseal .................. Great sacks Bonded Water Well Constructor Certification: - issueab . Great American Insurance um ed throu h cas in at••- .0'• Bona y suretycMT--rN.me How was cement grout placed: P.....P......................g.............. -B• ,n�nrr t0 round level .................................. 'Phis well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to ......gi......................................................................... ...................................................... . the best of my knowledge and belief. Was pump installed?.......n9.............Type............HP............Depth............M Name kt...M-...JANMEN..W.EJ ...QR.1LL1N-Q..GO.,.,...��p::�:�..... 1 Per.oa..firm«aorporatwnl plugs............Size:location............ft ..... Was n drive shoe cued? ❑Yes (%NO PI f t strata contain unusable watef! ❑Yes 33 No Address 1-Q7.5..... .� .r.... 'lv of Wster? de th of strata (Signed 'T ............................................................... i. W.tar Well an.trt.ctar Method of tali attain orf &,IQ/J A.. iEis Date ..............i/.41-a3•...........19......... Was well gravel pe eked? Olies XXNo Slzeofgravel:..................... ..................[L SF-4529ZM Gravel placed trom................. ft.to..... WATER$ESOIJRCES DEPAR'1'A'tENT. NOTICE TO WATER WEI L CONSPRUCTOft SALEM.OREGON 97710 The original Mrd fiat copy of this reget within 30 days from the data of aa11 completion an to be filed with the ..._._ -... t �� d 7 ori6tnat and first copy )&;4V WATER WELL REPORT " "� `�4 '' of this report are to be filed with the STATE OF OREGON APP 3 1975tate Well No. �5 !( .. -—1C!(-I STATE EN" TNEER• SALEM. OREGON 97310 (Please type or print) it wntn 30 days from the date STATE ENGINEBMe Permit No. of well completion. (Do not write above this line) (1) OWNER: / (10) LOCATIO/;F OF WELL: LL// Name �iY/f /s ��(� County jgAj!S ,_< Driller's well number T�� Address .s �/V�G %S F/V '.L Section T. aS R. I VV" W.M. i1 Y- Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well t9 Deepening ❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon ❑ If abandonment.describe material and procedure to Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found oZ,�.� �] ft. Rotary '0 Driven (3DomesticU Industrial [3 Municipal [3 Static level .` 0 �( ft.below land surtace. Date. ods' Cable ❑ Jetted ❑ Due ❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date JJ oy CASING INSTALLED: Threaded/❑ welded�) (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing Diam. from ___io_..._ ft_ to ft.T ft. Gage Depth drilled �2 7e-I ft. Depth of completed well � 7t� ft Diam. from ft. to ...— — ft. Gage Formation: Describe color, texture, grain size and structure of materials: Diam. from _._._...____ ft. to ..... ft. Gage ..___...._...__ and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated, ±� with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in position of Static Water Levet and indicate principal water-bearing strata. PERFORATIONS' Perforated? ❑ Yes No. tljpe of perforator used MATEe1AL From To swL Size of perforations in. by in. _ .perforations from ft. to .___.__ �_ _ n. �-c4v/V C.0 o2 perforations from ft. to ft. _perforations from _ ft. to _ ft. �- • �r 4 s l 'r) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes No Sit Vf G'L _ !mss Manufacturer's Name /f s p d )( f•S-0 7'— �7� 8t/"if Type Model No. ��___�_._ _— 3k S T �� Sdiy�S �•3'_,e pi T Diam. __ Slot size._. Set from ft. to ft. �y7Sq 7- j Dlam_ slot size Set from ft. to ft i�w +Bf.Xi ++/ W eZ eSa a 7,9 CpLa (8) WELL TESTS' Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static level Was a pump test made? )Q Yes ❑No If yes, by whom? �p�i�l 10r Yield: y10 gal./min. with -SKEJ ft. drawdown after,-:,2 hrs. � O � Bailer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. Artesian flow g.p.m. r-f • C is- ��tperature of waCes� Depth artesian flow encountered ....__.._.__..... 1t. Work started �'�' �� 19 �7 Completed •3 - a.� 74 (9) CONSTRUCTION: Date well drilling machine moved off of well _-:3 '— ;z -6- 19 7 Well sial—IQateriai used ��r�v f`?, / Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: _._. � well sealed from lead striate to �n_ This well was constructed under my direct supervision. ft- Material3q.�e and information r ort •above are true to my Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal .. _�__ . _ Ln. best kn08nd belief. Diameter of well bore below seal —fw r : — �� tn. [Signed, .. ._.Uf±=l. .:.--•--....._.o'..._...._:+'3ate ._. ..___ , 19. / sacks (Drilltng Mach a Operator) Number of sacks of cement used in well seal .� .(_. _�._�__....., Number of sacks of bentonite used In well seal racks Drilling Machine Operator's License NO. ........ ................... r ___ Brand name of bentonite `Vater 6Vell Contractor's Certification: Number of pounds of bentonite per 100 gallons water lbs./loo gals. This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true t91—". best��/t-��iy knoo},t�,ledge and belief Was a drive shoe used? ❑Yes No Plugs_�S(ze:location _�_._ft 1`7a1ne -- .F.�L1C-L!`�.r x-----r•+ i• 7 •---•-`� Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes No f ee corporation) (7y"or p ) } Type of water? depth of strata Address _ -... 0 »-•�� r-- L......QL.... F Y Method of scaling strata off [Signed ......:............. _........ Was weft gravel packed? ❑ Yes No Stu of gravel: (water watt Contractor) Gravel placed from ft. to _-- ----- ft. Contractor's License No. 'r_2LAI. Date 3--»--'L 5. 19 7.= NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRke�- RJAN • 1 G ` The original and first copy - of thls report are to be c '�i"A_TER WELL REPORT filed with the . A 1_P' ENG 1 del state Well No. '*•E E::C:i`IE'En S!_I�AR• ORE^-02`3'9?":Ir q ' OF OREGON within 30 days from the date _" '�"�• o�='�:V i�lease type or print) State Permit No. ...._.___ .—._._ ._. of well completion. (2) OWNER: (Il) WELL TESTS: flowered below down is amount vel is Name Was a pump test made?PJ Yes 0 No If yes.by whom? Address f Yield: gal./min. with ft.drawdown after Z hrs. (2) LOCATIOkq OF WELL: Baller test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. " � County �, 04;L•- Drilleen well number Artesian flow g .. Date % y-Section T. R. W.M. Temperature of water Was a chemical analysis trade?❑Yes sf No Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner A (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of wellbelow casfag Depth drilled �V _� ft. Depth of completed well /a ft. Formation:Describe by color,character &Us of material and structure,and show thickness of agMfiers and the)tint and nature of the material to each stratum penetrated, wtth at least one entry for each change of formation. MATERIAL FROM TO (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): (�Ur Well Deepening❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon ❑ J ii..�"-�•.�+ndonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Domestic Industrial ❑ 'Municipal ❑ -� Cable •ja Jetted ❑ c w a O Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Dug ❑ Bored ❑ G� (6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded Q Welded d' LlCz / 7 44'—'Diam.from �_ft.to _ ft. Gage Diem.from ft to it. Gage _ Diam.from It.to __it. Gage _ (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated?❑ Yes X No T)pe of perforator used Size of perforations in. by in. ' perforations from __._»_._..__.__..___ ft. to —-------------------------- ft. 4.41 perforations from ._.__._...................... — —/ perforations from .—__»_.___._ ft. to ... _...._._. .....— ft. perforations from _— _ ft. to ____._.._ — ft. perforations from— _.--- ft. to — — _____ ft. (8) SCREENS: Wen screen installed? ❑Yes Lq No Manufacturer's Name ( _..»»._.._._.._.. Model No. __»._......__._"_..._....... ..........»._ Slot size __..»._._.._ Set from .._......_............ft. to --------------- ft. Work started �—W 19 Completed V�� Diam. _ _..—_Slot size— __ Set from _..._. _._ft. to _....— ____.._ ft. Dare well drilling machine moved off of well- �6=Z+6 19 i (9) CONSTRUCTION: (13) PUAIP: Well seal—Material used in seal ,. .�..4_. » ..... ___.»__..___.__ _. Nr.nufacturer' Nane __._..._....._._..___—2-:163,421— Depth _._ i Depth of seal S/.�%— ft. Was packer used? J _.•-..!�J..Gd�....__ Type: ......._»._...._..__........_....._...... H.P. - --.._ ._...._. } Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal __,l.�...__ in. Were any loose strata cemented off?❑Yes V No Depth _....._. __._..—.__ Yater Well Contractor's Certification: I Was a drive shoe used?❑Yes DL No This well was drilledu der my jurisdiction and this report Is Was well gravel packed? ❑Yes R No Size of gravel: true to the best f my ledge and bel' f. s G �1 placed from _ _ft.to _.____—ft. t NAME ........ ....... ...... • _D _ny strata coe.tain unusuable water? Q Yes iii No een-on. !' or Corporal nl . vpe a k Type of water? depth of strata Address¢.. .....`� 7 Method of sealing strata off Drilling Machine Qperat is Li e (IU) WATERLEVELS: } �O . .....N.. —--_...._.._...._ _ ; �- 'lSigned] ..... .. ..�(.. ......_ ......... ........... ................._........... .... E Static level ft.below land surface Date�.�below land surface Date- �7 W�atyer Well Contractor) Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch Date Contractor's License No. � Date ...........7� •• ALG\♦ •. v LVL�l1\Al-LVA• The original`and first copy of this report are to be filed with the NATER WELL REPORT �< WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. STATE OF OREGON State Well No. .S�'� (J �]CC SALEM. OREGON 97310 (Please type or print) with ]O days from the date o State Permit No. o[well completion. (Do not write above this line) "-" -•---' i • (1) OWNER: I (10) LOCATION OF WELL: Name /r`/,f/e{// I W C12 Fa-f-/ County W-61 t+�y Driller's well number Address oZ-T 7�� .$L1J 43- / .4 'i.S =dW% Section T_-2t:.% R. 0 N� W M ed.t!i_ iw CYC (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner New Well❑ Deepening:OL Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ IL abandonment,describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) 'NATER LEVEL: Completed well. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found JR-74l 3d c/ ft. Rotary Driven ❑ Domestic V• Industrial ❑ Municipal Q Static level p s- e ❑ Jetted Q �� ft. below land surface. Date ��"O ❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure ?las. per square inch. Date _- (5) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded 0 ( 12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing Diam. from .. �L�� . .......— ft. Gage ...._..... Depth drilled `,3y ft. Depth of completed well ��3 ft. Dlam from .... tt' to .....-----.�...__ tI Cage ...._.. '�- Formation: Describe color• texture. grain size and structure of materials: _.r...' Diam. from ....._..........._.._ ft. to ..........._......... ft. Gage .....�»..._..._.� and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated, with at least one entry for each change of formation.Report each change in 46) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? Q Yes ($No. position of Static Water Level and Indicate principal water-bearing strata. Type of Perforator used 3CATSRIAL from To aWL Size of perforations in. by In. perforations from .. ft to _ ttr r i1S • perforations from ft. to _` ft. C . • _ perforations from ___.__r ft. to ft Pr S 4Z N SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes br No manufacturer's Name Type ..__...__..» ._ _.... _—..__._.. .._.r........_ Model No. Diam. ._ _-... Slot size Set from...._...._....ti_ ft. to ».»................. ft. DLam- Slot size. Set from fL to_ ft• (S) WELL TESTS' Drawdown is amount water level is � ^ !� -� e Ir r- lowered below static level `- -_a pump test made? ',Yes Q No If yes by whom?40dQd'A 2011' , Leta E i Sao gal./min. with '�j2 LG�drawdown atter � hrs. 4 _ _ WATER RESOURCFq SAI-Em- �B•.'er test gaL/min. -11h ft. drawdown after h-- 1. ,�sian,..now g•P•m. �y 9 Temperature of wated��epth artesian flow encountered .................. ft. Work started - '7 19 g4' Completed / /C 19 940 (9) CONSTRUCTION: Date well drilline machine moved off of well '7- /,Q 1994 4 Well seal-Material used .__................ ..... . _.�..} Drilline Machine Operator's Certification: Well seated from land surface to��Q./'C2 ,_•,___• ft. This well was constructed tinder my direct supervision. Materials and info at porte above are true to my Diameter of well bore to bottom best kn ed and belie Diameter of well tore below seal ............................... in. t 1 [Signed Vii' ... r\a!tBate ...!_.-_ ..� •19. � Number of sacks of cement used in well seal ................................................ sacks (Drilling Maeh a Ocerator) How was cement grout placed? ................................. ..................... . Drilling Machine Operator's License No. -,�3ia4:..........-............... .................... .........................................._.................................................--............................................................. Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is free LO est a �' k_nol.;ledge and �obeliieet s Did a drive shoe used? ❑Yes Q No Plugs ........ . Stu: location ............ ft. - Y •-�F- lilt-�1 .�i[L� I)td any strata contain unusable water? Nance Y /' 7 '-J`"-- J.1/�t� Q Yes No Type. of water? erson f orpmrauon) or t) depth of strata Address .._.. . Method of sealing strata oft [Signed] � . ! . Was well ». .-. gravel packed? Q Yes No Stu of gravel: ................. twater Wetl ontrsctor) Gravel Paced from ....... ........ ft, to -.......... ....... ft. j Contractor's License Na. Date /� NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTR C`OR The original and drat copy ♦ E `YELL REPORT o[this report are to be Y�. hied with the � OF OREGO[V state well No. ' � •=�'�' ---•— STATE ENGINEER. SALEM.OREG N 9 10,' =�� r _•��(� ( e type or print) within 30 days from the date r e,d� �(Do®ot write above this line) State Permit No. ........_------------------------------------- ot well completion. (1) OWNER: (11) LOCATION OF WELL: well number 5i7—f Name YrQ. Atldre� Bake CountElaCIG1 Driller's ig Address 24250 S. K 65th Tualatin Or. 97062 N;7 Nw !. section 6 T. 2S R. 1E w.Ia- Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well]] Deepening O Reconditioning O Abandon❑ If abandonment.describe material and procedure In Item Ii (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing Rotary O Jetted Driven❑ Domestic Industrial ❑ municipal ❑ Cable 0 Jetted ❑ Depth drilled 250 !c Depth of completed well 2 0 ft. Dug O Bored Cl Irrigation O Test Well ❑ Other ❑ aterials: Formation: Describe color. texture. grain size and structure of m C/� CASING INSTALLED: Threaded O Welded yj and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated. ( ',' with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change . ' Dtam. from it. to ��.. :t. Gage _L�.e.2>�0_.. in position of Static Water Level as drilling proceeds. Note drilling rates. _....._._. Diam, from _ ft. to ft. Gage ........ ....._. MATERIAL From To SWI. ................... Diam. from ................_»».. ft. to ...._. .....__...... !t. Gage .............._........ 0:.3ri='C Ci_2 0 l ok i. PERFORATIONS: Perforated?❑Yes 10 NO. r trPd ard. Ere1 103 103 >e of perforator used Rock P Size of perforations in. by ins v perforations from — S• to ft (' s h�r'j p_erey — - 121t 116 — perforations from tL to --- ft. RO1 perforations from ft. to --- ft* pC1C_�_f121 132 16 1 perforations from — — M to ft 30 --_...._...._. _ perforations from — __ ft. to »_ — __..___.... it. - zO —210 118 (7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yes 1XNo Manufacturer's Name Type Model No. — Diam. ......_....Slot size — ...- Set ft. to ._._.....—_._... ft Diam. ................ Slot size ................ Set from ........._...»_...... ft. to ........................ ft. (8) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. - Statte level 11.8 ft. below land surface Date 9--3-69 •.�_ fan pressure Sbs. per square inch Date WELL TESTSDrawdown is amount water level is (9) • lowered below static level Was a pump test made?❑ Yes Ye No If yes.by whom? i9 69 Work started AuR. 19 1969 Completed S-At. 15 toId: gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. C Date well drilling machine moved off of well Sspt. 16 1969 _ - Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: This well was constructed under my direct supervision. Mate- Bauer test 1R gal/min with 75 ft. drawdown after 1 hrs- rials used and information reported above are true to my best knowledge d belie . Arteslan flow g.p.m. Date /mac ....... DateSaPt....21 Ida9-.. Temperature: of water 5LOWas a chemical analysis made?❑ Yes (ZNo [Signed] ......... .... .. - (Dri 11 C Machine OD-rotor) ' (10) CONSTRUCTION: �44 Drilling Machine Operator's License No. ...........398........................... Well seal—Material used tC_ -_•--------------------_---- Depth of seal —.........____.-_.__..—..—. _ _ kQ_---.._--_............-- ft. Water Well Contractor's Certification: ame:er o[well bore to bottom of seal 1 -•-- in. This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. .dere any loose strata cemented off? ❑Yes N No Depth —_....__....__.. NAME5tel4j..x 1111 l-2r-.23.a---------_......•••....._----__........_•._. .....---_-------- Was a drive shoe used? 1a Yes ❑No (Person.firm or corporationt ('type or pNnet Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑Yea 10 No 5112 S E.McLougillin,ltiil�ratlkle,t?I'• 97222 Address' ' •....__...._..... w._....»_.._._ ... Type of water? depth of strata 33//��__ NN•,�''99 Method of sealing strata off (Signed] CJf•, ••`�•-••'•s•�- ...»..... i (water VYeli Contractor( Was well gravel packed? O Yes He Slze of gravel: ................................ ATn ,._Sept. 23 ta69 tl .i.u,ri. i `d "a MATER WELL REPORT {/�,�•1 The original and first co PY ]li•�' � L.. 1✓.•G:.i� are to be tiled with the �pp QQ state Wen No. ..4r`� •LLLL�••- •-•••••• •••-••' WATER RESOURCES DEpARTAtZST. 21•�� STATE OF QREGOrr SALEM. OREGON 9?ALO O�pTtPlease type or print) sate Permit No. ------•-•- ....••. within 30 days fri�m ltie�(Qe RESOURCES (Do not.mite above this line) of well comDietion. SALEM. OREGON (10) LOCATION OF WELL: (1) OWNER: County C19CLC£tttlAS Delller's well number 57-69 X79) Name *trs. Andre Bq.ke N.7 % section6 T• 2S R_ lE W.M. alatin Ore. Nil Address�� O S. W. 6 th Ave. ' 97 Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New well❑ Deepening 9 Reconditioning ❑ Abandon I7 (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. it abandonment,describe material and procedure to Item li 2 ft. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water wa: :int sound 3 20 79 Rotary 30 Driven ❑ Domestic $i industrial ❑ bdunicipal ❑ Static level 1 8 !t. below land surtaea. Data Cable ❑ Jetted ulbs, per square Inch- Date Dug O Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Wel) ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure ( ASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded❑ »� (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing -- 6 ---- ft to !t. Gage _. ••»»- Depth drilled 7��Q ft. Depth of completed well 60 ft- Diam. from — - _` _.w. - »... tt to ft. Gage ----_---_---------_ grain size and structure of materials: _-_,_•_�_'Diam. from ---- Formation: Describe color• texture, g d. _.»..». _ ft. to ft Gage ..-._ _. •••••-•- and show thickness and nature a each stratum and aquifer penetrate ...._._' Diam. from - »- -•-• - "'-" with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change In _... position of Static Water Level and indicate principal water-bearing strata. (C`7Yes NO-Perforated? O bfAlcRtAl. ,tram To sw-L Type Of pectorator used t hard a 250 329 Sn. by In. brOWrl 2g 342 Size of perforafions l.t g and :t- to _.-_.. --- n b k and brown soft --•••--�,-•�perforations from _..�.-------- 35� 185 _ -ft. to _ -- it �` perforations from 20 111 ft. to perforations from .-., 0 ell-SCREENS: Well screen Installed? ❑ Yes Q r No t Gre Ha-rd _nufacturees Name - to O r well Model No. _... -- For the ori ina.l drill to efer 60• i 'type ._-.....__...-_.-_�---- -_..-_ 4'57-69, dated September 2 Diam. Slot stet ......�_ Set from .-..._»».----- ft. to __._..»»_. _ ft. r9^,Cr Diam. Slot size _—-_ Set from__ -•--- ft. to . - -- !t (8) NYELL TESTS: lowered er level r= below static level Was a pump test made? ❑Yes No If yes. by whom? Yield: gal./min- with it. drawdown after hrs. ^ Bailflclt�`z 20 gal./min• with 170 0 ft. drawdown after 1 htz- Artesian flow g•p•m. 19 ft. Work started /,Q 19 L Completed erature of water Depth artesian flow encountered » Date well drilling machine moved off of well 3/J 20 1 97 (9) CONSTper • RUCTION: Oator's Certiflcatlan: Well seat—Material used ....__............................................_............._.................................. This well was constru4ted under myDrilling blachine direct Supervision. well sealed from Land surface to .............................................................. -•-•-- ft. Materials used and information reported above are true to my best knou�'�d�e and be&�_ Diameter Of well bore to bottom of seat .......................... f\ik ►^ In' (Signed] <..�Sai'. ------ Date ...--3�-2 ..., .1x.79• Diameter of well bore below seal ............................... i atorl 718 sacks a ......•. 013cllling 1 Sochi Operator's License No. Number of sacks of cement used in well seal .................. How was cement grout placed? ...................................................................................... ................... .. . ................................................ ........................................................._............. water iYell Contractor's Certification: -•.•••••-.--•• ...•»•» This well was drilled under my Jurisdiction and this report is ......'-'•'•• true to the best of my knowledge and belief. ........................ ... _..... Size: location ..-......... ft- Name Steilll loo Bros. Drilling o-,i�iy"aOre. r pttna 222 a drive shoe used? Yes ® No Plugs..........-. ^--•---___.--------------•-•• "'••• or atton) LPerson, ttsn+ crf Did anY strata eaniain unuszbte water? ❑ Yes ] Na S E Holly Axe.t••.M'� W� Y®•`•-• �••••••• Address .73,023... �_ Type of water? depth of strata _- Method of sealing strata off (Signed] ........' (Water Well Contractor) Ronald F- McConnell 197`1.. Was well travel Packed? [J Yes No Size of gravel: ................................ 626 2d !Mer ! 2�J ...... ft, to ..... ft. Contractor's License I . ................ Data ...............�................_., Gravel placed from ....... ..................... i City of Tigard Planning Conmission { Tigard, Oregon 97223 Submitted by: P,eynold Kordatzl y Solder Shack 8900 SW Burnham - F-24 Tigard, Oregon 97223 July 12, 1983 Q�PER 8900 S.W. Burnham Sp. F-24 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-2100 My name is Reynold Kordatzky, owner of The Solder Shack located at 8900 SVI Burnham, Bldg. F-24 Tigard, Oregon 97223. The Solder Shack is a small family-owned business specializing in stuffing and hand soldering of printed circuit boards. On May 2, 1983 I rented Bldg. F-24 which was advertized in the newspaper as light industrial warehouse and office space. The property manager, 1.11r. Don Powell, indicated to my wife and I that our type of business would be permitted in this building. I went to Hillsboro City Hall and was told Tigard handled their own business permits. I telephoned Tigard City Hall and was informed they did not require a business permit but the building had to be inspected by someone from their office prior to occupancy. On May S, 1983, Mr. Ed iValden, Engineer from the City Planning Department inspected my building. I was informed by Mr. Walden (frith Mr. Don Powell, property manager present) I needed to make sure there were proper exit signs posted and a lock on the rest room door. We would be allowed to have approximately 6-8 employees. Mr. 1alden expounded on how the city of Tigard encourages small businesses, like myself, to operate here and this location was ideal for small companies to get their start. Nothing was ever mentioned to me about obtaining a business tax license or that this property was not properly zoned. Knowing I had followed proper procedures, I started to do some remodeling. We put in an air-circulating system, drop ceiling, a wall partition, flores- cent lights and did extensive painting, including carpeting the office and window dressing. I also purchased new and used furniture and eauipment for the business. I then contacted the State for my I.D. nUnnber, withholdin- ta_r payment forms, Tri-Flet excise tax forms, and my employment tax rate. I also received my Worker's Compensation Insurance thru S.A.I.F. A business bank account was established, business cards and business letterheads were printed, telephone installed, and thirty (30) business form letters were sent out to prospcc- tive customers using this new address. On June 22, 1983 I was informed by Mr. Don Powell, property manager, that this property was not zoned for my type of business and this zone change took place N,.rch 1, 1983, two (2) months prior to my renting and having the building inspected by Mr. Ed 14alden. ® SNAC � 8900 S.W. Burnham Sp. F-24 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-2100 Page 2 On June 23, 1983, I telephoned Mr. Walden's office to explain what had taken place and was informed by having Mr. Walden inspect my building two (2) things were accomplished -- 1) structure requirements met type of business operation and 2) properly zoned for type of business. All I would have to do now was: to apply for a business tax license and pay the $50.00 fee. This was the first time a business tax license was ever mentioned to me. I applied for my business tax license the same day and was informed I would be notified on approval. June. 27, 1983 I received a phone call from The City Planning Department in- forming me my application had been denied because the property was not zoned for my type of business. I spoke with Liz Newton who stated she would permit me to stay thru July 1983 pending the outcome of these hearings. The Solder Shack operates a highly technical business, stuffing and hand soldering of printed circuit boards from electronic companies. This type of business is very clean and quiet. I would like to bring to the attention of this Board there is no difference in my business operation than the Tigard Farm-Out division of Tektronics, who share the same building complex with Tigard City Hall on SIV Ash, less than one (1) block from my address. The Solder Shack is not a manufacturing company; merely a company providing service to the electronic industry. I respectfully submit my request to be able to remain at 8900 SIS' Burnham without facing the overwhelming cost of relocation, loss of business, and interruption of production. Because The Solder Shack is a small family business, there is a great possibility of losing everything my wife and I have invested. Thank you. V v truly you , w•�Q 4 Reynold Kordatzky RK:blm I III III I log I HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN PORTLAND 15555 S.W. BANGY ROAD, SUITE 301 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 503/684-1880 THE HOUSING CENTER Mr. Frank: Te .July-12, 1983 pedino, President Tigard Planning•Commisslon City of Tigard Dear Mr. Tepedino: As promised, the Home Builders Association has reviewed the proposed community development code. -Our intention in recommending changes to the code is primarily to assure that it works as a practical document in the real world. -We do raise several policy issues but most of our comments are more in the mechanics area, asking such questions as what information is needed and when does the city really need it. We have -met once with your staff to. discuss the Planned_Development sections and have agreed on a number of changes the Commission should adopt. Those comments are included with our other comments, which are presented In the order of the code sections. p 18. 08(B), 18. 10 - Add language so that developments shall comply with the Y This-addre'sses comprehensive plan "as implemented b this code." raised by the Supreme Court's ruling in Fhiiippi v. City of Sublimity ambiguities. 18.22.040(A) (3) - We are unable to locate in the plan a requirement that quasi- judicial decisions show a p("c need for change. This should be deleted. ?8.24.0.50 - 'T"mmhis a — "'' nance findings sho.tving nuisance to a iisttrerather than aut maticall only if the nuisanceodeclarin rdl requires uses t be nuisances. Y a Definitions, Floor Area - We suggest that onlythe Rfigkion of lly covered by a structure be 'Included in the flor area The area undear over- hangs should not -,ount as part of the floor area because it does not affect soil permeability or the mass of the building. 18.30.020(A) (5) -Contract purchasers should also be permitted to apply for legislative changes just as they are for quasi-judicial changes. 18.30.050(D) (2) - If applications are accepted only twice each year, then all valid applications must be accepted and acted upon within the established timellne. If 60 days will not be sufficient, then. set 90 days as the timeline and do away with the mandatory waiver. 18.30. 140 A ( ) 4( ) - The reference to the comprehensive plan Is unnecessary. The code and other ordinances implement the plan should be sufficient. home Builders Comments July 12, 1983 Page Two 18. 32.040(C) - We object to all mandatory waivers of deadlines and to provisions which aq%brize the Director to refuse applications which refuse to grant the waiver. 18.32.200(A)(1) - Rather than "at least 5 days after", shouldn't this read "ro more than 5 days after"? 1-8.32.230 - The 12-month period should.run from the date of the final ci_.� action. 18.32.270(B)(3). - Applicants should have the option of presenting oral argu- = .ments on appeals. Written arguments do not allow for sufficient communication between"Ahe council and the parties to the appeal, hindering the council in its decision making and seriously affecting the-rights of the parties. 18.32.320(6) - Mandatory petitions for rehearing are a waste of all parties' time. Each side has already presented its best case so the rehearing is nothing more than a formality. 18.SO - The R-4.5 zon0hould allow lots of 7,000 sq. ft. rather than 7,500. The additional 500 sq. ft. adds virtually nothing to the lot but It costs the developer approximately one lot for each two acres developed. That amounts ® to a substantial cost that must be spread amo_1@19 the remaining fewer lots. 18.54.OSO(C)(5) - The 30-foot required setback is excessive. We suggest this be changed to "the lesser of twice the required setback of the abutting district or 30 feet." 18.56 050. (C)(5) - same 18.58.050(E) - It is unclear if the lot coverage standard is intended to include parking areas. If so, this is too low. (The Home Builders continues to believe that the city relies too heavily in its plan on densities of 40 units per acre.) 18.80.030(6) - Extensions should be granted for 12-month periods, rather than six. 18.80.060(A)';(B) -�"`"!e do not believe that the existence of planned developments ; should be the maljor distinction between established and developing areas. The function of those designations should be to provide a buffer between areas that have developed over the years under the old standard lot size and setbacks. and the areas which must develop more densely to reflect LCDC standards and shrinking land supplies. The ordinance provides a mechanism for allowing PD's In established areas, but has no similar mechanism for allowing standard subdivisions in deve- loping areas. While PD's may be desirable in many Instances, they involve much more work and aggravation for the developer and the city. It is reasonable to believe that standard subdivisions will be appropriate in many instances and they should be allowed if the meet the standards of the underlying zone. 18.80.080(A) (2) - The references to lot should read site. Home Builders Comments July 12, 1983 Page Three 18.80.100(-A) - Phasing of PD's over only 3 years in effect means no.phasing. The period sho'.dd be extended-to seven years, the same period allowed by statute:for condominiums. Many projects even have 15-20 years phasing plans. 86.116(13)(3) Flotations should be added to clarify that"type"refers to single fai.11y, vs4 attached vs. apartment, etc. 18..80 120(q)(9) - Clarify. to show that the percentage reduction refers to. square feet or lineal feet. 18.80.220(A) - In our discussions with staff, they said that while applicants are required to submit all revisions at least 15 days before the hearing, there was a corresponding obligation on the city to notify the appicant of required revisions at least 30 days before the hearing. We are unable to find support for that in the ordinance. If it is not in the ordinance, language to that effect should be added. 18.80.230(6)(3)(a) - This section is unnecessary since the subject is covered in 4(a). 18.80.230(B)(5)(b) - Add "observable from the adjacent dweeling-uhits." 18.80.230(B) (9) - The information requested regarding signs is much more detailed --.-than,the developer can be expected to have.prepared at this stage. Information on the proposed general location of signs would be approporiate at this stage. I 18.80.240(A) (5) - Indicate that these are the hazard areas'as specified by the SCS. 18.80.260 and following - These sections should refer to "concept plans" for the various areas, rather than to site plans, grading pians, etc. As currently labeldd they imply a greater lege: of detail than is actually expected and will create unreal- istic expectations=.in those reviewing the plans. 18.80.260(A)(6) - Locations of. proposed utilities should require only schematics. 18.-80.260(A)(10). (11) -``This information is not necessary at this stage of review. 18.80.270(A) (2) - This should be clarified to state that retention is not required by implication. Ia.So.280(A)(1),(3) - Regarding the irrigation system, only an .indication of the type of system to be used should be required. . As to proposed landscaping, the concept plan should indicate the general location and the function if a specialized function. 18.84.040(A)(9) - A performance bond should be permitted in lieu_of a cash deposit. 18.84.080(A) (7) - As before, schematics for proposed utilities locations should be sufficient. 18.84.090(A) (3)(d) - The cut and fill calculations call for too much detail for this stage of the review. General data from the engineer should suffice. Nome Builders Comments July 12, 1983 Page Four 18.90.030(.x) (3) Work should be.allowed-.tq continue past 6 pm without a permit. Work often continues during the construction season till 8 pm and beyond. :18.50.070 .=„ 1`ractor.equipment moving about- the site will transmit heat across the property line•:when Jt the ilne as it must. Such equipment should be exempt from the rule. '-ARemoving sen sitive•<lands and dedicated park lands from the net :.-i site area before calculating.the allowable_density in effect.r�esul.ts.in no density transfer: The.purpose of'the transfer is to move structures from .land that is unbuildable or should be preserved onto lands that are easily buildable without reduction in the number of units allowed. These sections should be deleted. 18.92.030(A) (2) - This should read "not exceed the maximum number of units per gross site acre.” 18. 104.040 - Clarify fiat this applies only to multifamily structures on the same site. 18. 104.700 - Is the 10 foot setback on flag lots consistent with the setback requirements In other standard districts? 18. 111.020(K)(3) Thls is an .in(Dmplete sentence. 18. 111. 130(A) (2) - One covered parking space per detached or attached single family dwellingin addition to the garage is excessive. The requirement for a third covered space should be de eted. 18. 120.060(A) (1) - Requiring a bond for 150% of the estimated project cost is excessive. Most jurisdictions require only 100 or 110%. 18. 120. 130(A) (3)(b) - Should read "problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated." 18. 156.030(E) - The right of of and roadway w.idths for local streets are excessive. People no longer desire the wide boulevards through their neighborhoods and the extra width creates unnecessary costs which thgresidents must pay. A 40 ft. ROW and 28 ft roadway width should suffice. 18. 156 080(C) - Where oversizing is required, the developer should be reimbursed by new developments which hook up to the system during the following 10 years for their proportional share of the cost. This system works quite well in a number of other jurisdictions. We will continue.to review the draft document and will notify the staff and Commission at the earliest possible time of any changes we propose. Sincer ly, Ken anwa Staff Attorney i STAFF RESPONSE TO HOME BUILDERS COMMENTS 1. Suggestion: 18.08 (B) 10as implemented by this Code..." Response: Staff recommends that this phrase be included. 2. Suggestion: 18.22.040(A)(3) "...public need" Response: Staff agrees that this section should be deleted. 3. Suggestion: 18.24.050 "nonconforming uses are public nuisances..." Response: The phrase "and a public nuisance could be deleted without changing the intent of this section. 4. Suggestion: Definitions, Floor Area. "Area under overhangs should not be counted as floor area" Response: Staff agrees with this suggestion and would suggest the following: Floor Area. The gross horizontal area, under roof, of all floors of a building, measured from the exterior walls, excluding vents, shafts, courts, and space devoted to off-street parking. 5. Suggestion: 18.30.020(A)(5) Include contract purchases on list of possible applicants for legislative changes. Response: After reviewing this issue and the intent of legislative changes, staff believes it is more appropriate to limit legislative change requests to the Council, Commission, City staff and recognized City civic organizations. 6. Suggestion: 18.30.050(D)(2) Establish timeline and do away with waiver. Response: HB 2295 which was passed by the Legislature during their recent session will require applications to be acted upon within 120 days of submittal. Staff is now in the process of reworking its review time to comply with State law. 7. Suggestion: 18.30.140(A)(4) Delete reference to applicable comprehensive plan policies. Response: A Legislative change is usually based on a local jurisdiction plan policies in some way regardless of the type of change, therefore staff believes it is important to include this language. 8. Suggestion: 18.32.040(C) i Response: see #6 above. 9. Suggested: 18.32.200(A)(1) change "at least 5 days" to "Ido more than 5 days" Response: Staff agrees and has suggested language to say "within 3 days..." 10. Suggestion: 18.32.200 "from date of City final decision" Response: Staff would agree with this suggestion. 11. Suggestion: 18.32.270(B)(3) Include oral agreement. Response: Staff would agree with this suggestion. 12. Suggestion: 18.32.320(B) Delete mandatory rehearings Response: Staff agrees with this suggestion. 13. Suggestion: 18.50 R-4.5 should allow lots of 7,000 square feet versus 7,500 square feet Response: Staff has checked with various other jurisdictions in the metro area and they do allow for 7,000 square foot lots versus 7,500 square feet. Staff does believe this size is appropriate and would support such a change, however, this may be a policy question to be resolved at the Council level. 14. Suggestion: 18.54.050(C)(5) and 18.56.050(C)(5) Change language of r required setbacks where multiple family zones abut single family zones. { Response: The community has demanded a buffer area between these zones. 15. Suggestion: 60% of lot coverage is too low, and City is relying too heavily on R-40 Response: Staff would suggest this figure be changed to 80 percent and include parking areas as definition of lot coverage suggests. There is only one small area of R-40 in the entire planning area. The Home Builders have suggested more medium and low-medium density to allow for more 5,000-7,000 square foot SF lots which staff believes in appropriate if the City wants residential ownership versus renters. The Council, however, has rejected this concept in order to retain larger lots. i 16. Suggestion: 18.80.030(B) Extension should be for 12 months versus b months. Response: Staff agrees that 6 months often does not give builders a choice if 6 months is in the middle of January: 12 months seems appropriate. 17. Suggestion: 18.80.060(A),(B) Allow PD's in Established in Areas and disallow PD's in Developing g Areas if standard subdivision. Response: Staff agrees that not every proposal in a Developing Area need go through the PD process if it meets standard requirements. The attempt by staff was to allow for more flexibility in Developing Areas, but also allow standard developing. Staff suggests the following: Section 18.88.030(C) C. If a development P proposal within a Developing Area meets all of the standard criteria set forth in Chapters 18.44 through 18.72 (zoning district classifications) then such a development need not be reviewed through the PD process; except those properties and including an area within 200 feet of an Established Area. 18. Suggestion: 18.80.080(A)(2) Lot should read site. Response: Staff agrees with this suggestion. 19. Suggestion: 18.80.100(A) Phasing PD's over 10 years rather than 3 years. Response: Staff agrees with this suggestion. 20. Suggestion: 18.80.120(8)(3) Clarify "type" Response: Staff will include examples of residential types, i.e. single family, multiple family 21. Suggestion: 18.80.220(A) Staff obligations to developers regarding review and exchange of information. Response: In section 18.32.030 Pre—application conference, staff is required to supply information to each applicant regarding Policy and ordinance requirements. Staff is suggesting that the time period be shortened from 15 to 12 days before the public hearing. 22. Suggestion: 18.80.230(B)(3)(a) Ibis section implies a duplication of Private outdoor space. 111 101 MEMME Response: Staff believes this section is somewhat redundant to section (4)(a). Perhaps (4)(a) could be expanded to include multiple d residential un family and single family attar a) could be deleted.s with ground floor 1he s 23. Suggestion: 18.80.230(8)(5)(6) add "observable from adjacent dwelling units" Response: Staff agrees to this change. 24. Suggestion: 18.80.230(8)(9) Vere is too much detail required for conceptual signs. Response: Staff agrees and offers the following change: "Location of all signs with the development site The remaining language could be deleted except for #(4). Reference Soil Conservation SErvice maps for 25. Suggestion- 18.80.240(A)(5) these hazards. Response: Staff agrees to this input. Indicate that the plans are conceptual only. 26. Suggestion: 7.8.80.260 Response: Staff agrees to this input. (A)(6)(c) Recommend schematic location of utilities 27. Suggestion: 18.80.260 rawings of. . ." in form Response: Staff agrees thatthe words "schematic d of subsection ( 28. Suggestion: 1$.80.260(A)(10)(11) Omit this subsection because they are i not necessary at this level of review. tS Response: Staff agrees to this change 29. Suggestion: 18.80.270(A)(2) Not to imply retention of drainage water. } Response: Staff is in the process of clarifying this requirement with the r Public Works Department. 30. Suggestion: 18.80.280(A)(1),(3) This subsection requires too much information at this level of review. Response: Staff agrees and offers the following change: 11(1) The conceptual location of required irrigation systems. (3) The location, size and species of existing plant materials and the general location of landscape areas; and" 31. Suggestion: 18.84.040(A)(9) A performance bond in lieu of cash. Response: Staff is in the process of reviewing this subsection with Public Works 32. Suggestion: 18.84.080(A)(7) Require only schematic location of utilities. Response: Staff agrees and suggests including the word "conceptual" before "location". 33. Suggestion: 18.84.090(A)(3)(d) Too much detail required for cut & fill at this level of review. Response: Staff disagrees, and believes that it is imperative that the Hearings Officer or Director have adequate information in which to review a Sensitive Lands proposal. 34. Suggestion: 18.90.030(A)(3) No permit required for construction after 6 pm. Response: Because it is often necessary to work until dark to complete construction projects, staff suggests changing this section from 6 pm to "until dark". 35. Suggestion: 18.90.070 Tractors also transmit heat across property lines and should be exempted. Response: Staff suggests the following language: 2nd sentence . .."signs, floodlights of parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work.. . In addition, the second and third sentences in this section should be reversed. 36. Suggestion: 18.90.020(A)(1),(4) Remove private streets and park land from density calculations. Response: Staff offers the following change: r (1) Keep subsection (A) as is and change Section 18.92.030 A. to read "Units per acre on land area(s) listed in Section 18.92.020(A)(1)(4) may be transferred. . ." s 37. Suggestion: 18.92.030(A)(2) Change language to read ��"not exceed the maximum member of units per gross site acre. q Response: Staff agrees that the language change states staff's original , intent in a simpler way. 38. Suggestion: 18.104.040 Clarify that this section applies to only E multiple family structure on the same site. { Response: This was staff's original intent and offers the following language to the section title to clarify this issue: 18.104.040 Distance Between multiple 'amil Residential Structures. . . 39. Suggestion: 18.104.100 10 foot setbacks as flag lots. Response: All side yards are 5' in residential zones, however, the Code is offering more structure placement flexibility in a flag lot initiation. It could turn out that a side yard would abut a rear yard of an adjacent structure (not the norm in standard lot situation) and the additional 5' adds more privacy for both structures. 40. Suggestion: 18.111.020(K)(3) Incomplete sentence ntence if it is used with introduction Response: it is a complete se phrase on page V-20 "Required parking space shall. .." 41. Suggestion: 18.111.130(A)(2) Requiring 3 parking spaces for single family. states that 2 spaces are required for each Response: This section only single family structure. One of those spaces must be covered. 42. Suggestion: ] ' .120.060(A)(1) 150% bond is excessive rather than 100% or ia0% Response: Staff is reviewing this issue with the Public Works Department. 43. Suggestion: 18.120.130(A)(3)(b) Missing wording Response: Staff agrees with comments; sentence should read "problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated i 0(E) Excessive local street width standards 44. Suggestion: 18.156.03 f f Response: Staff is in the process of reviewing this issue with the Public 7 Works Department. 45. Suggestion: 18.156.080(c) Oversizing reimbursement process of reviewing this with Public Works Response: Staff is in the Department. a i Fyre/7378E Minutes of NPO 3 Regular Meeting at the Home of Michael Smith 11645 S.W. Cloud Ct. 7:30 pm July 5, 1983 1. Call to order by chairperson Bledsoe at 7:30 pm. 2. Roll call : Present were Bledsoe, Ramsdell , Smith, Mortenson, and Porter(8:00 pm) . Excused absent were Fyre and Moonier 3. The NPO found one error and four omissions in the minutes of June 20, 1983. The corrected minutes are as attached. 4. Chairperson Bob Bledsoe distributed copies of the latest Transportation Plan and Bull Mountain Community Plan which he recieved upon request from Wash. Co. Planner, Rick Daniels. 5. Chairperson Bledsoe distributed draft copies of the letter from NPO 3 to City Council. The NPO requested three corrections in the letter. Bledsoe said he had not been able to find the language references about the Murray Blvd. extension; these were made in a motion adopting the transportation map. The NPO directed the Chair to request this subject to be placed as an agenda item before council. 6. Community Development Coale: a. Bledsoe reported that John Gibbon, representing the Homebuilder 's Association, requested that the lot size for the R 4.5 be changed from 7500 square feet to 7000 sq.ft. , like most other jurisdictions. NPO 3 concluded that because of all the time spent by everyone involved, we support the compromises that !,ave bean made, and we oppose this suggested change. It would change tic overall density calculations. Herman Porter will represent th.: NFO iut•_: 12 before the Planning Comumission o:: this issue. b. In 18.30.040 A on page II-2, the NFO would like to suggest that "twice per year" is too often and too costly to be making . legislative changes to the comprehensive plan. C. In 18.32.090 in regard to 18. 32.270 B & 18.32.275 the NPO _ asserts that the notice should include a statement that any appeal to council will be on the basis of written argument or correspondence only - - unless our siigestion of allowing recorded verbal argument is accepted. d. 18.86.010 B (Established Areas) Add the following: "A primary consideration in the review process shall be to preserve and enhance the character of the adjacent established areas." e, 18.86.020 A 2 (Established Areas) Delete sentence in parenthises and add: " , or if not so developed, the parcel is not contiguous with a Developing Area." This is similar for criteria for developing area, 18.88.020. f. 16.86.030 (Established Areas) add: " Within an Established Area ney+ development shall be of the same type and density in order to protect the character of existing neighborhoods. A primary consideration in all phases of the deveopment approval process shall be to preserve and enhance the character of the adjacent established areas." 7. NEXT MEETING to be held at Fowler Jr. High July 18 at 7:15 pm. 8. Adjourned at 10:10 pm. l Eyre/7165E Minutes of NPO 3 Special Meeting Fowler Junior High School 7:15 pm in the Library June 20, 1983 1. Called to order by chairperson Bledsoe at 7:22 pm. 2. Present were: Bledsoe, Smith, Mortenson, Porter, Ramsdell, and Fyre. Moonier abaent excused. Minutes of regular meeting held June 13 were read and approved. 3. Monahan's letter of May 12 to Wash. Co. Bill Monahan listened to members' concerns that his letter did not reflect the City Council's strong position with regard to the Murray Road issue. Monahan responded by asserting that he chose, as a compromise aimed at presevring a good working relationship with the County, not to voice the Council's strong position but rather to take a softer approach and point out that they, the County, were not following their own analysis. The issue of Co. right-of-way (ROW) in the urban planning area was discussed and Monahan mentioned that no options are to be precluded, i.e. , County ROW standards will not be precluded in urban planning areas. Some general discussion followed concerning traffic plans for the Becktold property. There seemed to be a general understanding that in the Urban Planning Area even if the County ROW standards are applicable the Cit: retains route determination. Monahan was thanked for taking time to repsond the the conserns of the NPO. The NPO directed the Chair to modify a !otter to the City Council stating NPO 3's position regarding Monahan's letter and to point out that there is a growing perception that City staff actions are often times inconsistant with the positions taking by the City Council during Council meetings. 4. Continuation of an open review of the Community Development Code resulted in the passage of the follwing recommended changes: a. Add "NPO" to the definition of "person" in section 18-03.030 aa. Add NPO to definitions. b. Drop "if active" from A-1-C Sections. 18. 32.080 A d and 18.32.200 A c and others. c. Add to 18. 32.055 (page II-15 in the CDC) and 18. 30.060, page I1-3 an item A.4 "The Director shall cite in the Staff report the additional information required, the reasons for requirement, and the authority for the requirement. Add item "h" to 16.30.070 C2 and an item 5 to 18.32.045 A3b: "A statement of additional information required, or the waiver of required information, with reasons and authority for the action." I d. Modify sections 18.94.020 & 030 to reflect the following: -Mobile home parks and subdivision will not exceed density limits of the underlying zone, and, be conditional use in all established areas. 18.94.020 (Mobile Home Subdivisions) (V-5 of CDC) A.1 should read "Permitted outright in developing R-7 and all multiple family zoning districts" and A.2 should read "A conditional use permitted in 3.5 and 4.5 residential zoning districts". 18.94.030 (Mobile Home Parks) A. 1 should read "Permitted outright in developing R-7 simgle family districts and all multiple family districts, and " A.2 should read "A conditional use permitted in R-4.5 districts." e. 18.92.020 Density Caculations Suggest the follwing changes: 18.92.020 A.2 should become A.3 A.4 should become A.2 i" A.3 should become A.4 The new A.3.a should read: Single fa.��ily - allocate 208 of gross acres remaining after subtracting areas referenced in A.1&2. for public facilities;- The new A.3.b should read: Multiple family - allocate 15% of gross acres remaining after s::btracting areas referenced in A.1&2.for public facilities; 18.92.030 Residential Density Transfer should be changed to read as follows: Units per acre on unbuildable land area(s) listed in Section 18.92.020 (A. 1) and (T..2) may be . . . . And add Section A.2 No units may be transferred from land dedicated to the public for park purposed if such dedication was in lieu of paying the SDC for parks. f. It was mentioned that Transition Zones and Road Restriction are not in the CDC. g, Zoning districts In 18.48.40 (R 3.5) delete Mobil Home Park as conditional use In 18.50.30 (R 4.5) delete Mobil Home Park and Mobil Home Subdivision as permitted uses. i i In 18.50. 40 (R4.5) allow Mobil Home Subdivision as conditional use, and allow Mobil Home Park as conditional use provided the housing density is not thereby increased. h. In 18. 30.050 B 3, 18.32.040 B3 and 18.32.275 B-C-D Specify the waiver of fees and transcript costs for an applicaticn or appeal by the Planning Commission, Parks Board, or the NPO' s. i. In 18.32.270 B 2 "The review . . . by Council shall be: . The subject of written argument OR RECORDED VERBAL ARGUMENT only 5. Other Business it was agreed to get the Urban Planning Area on the City Council's November meeting agenda. 5. NEXT MEETING to be held Tuesday, July 5, 7:15 pm at Mike Smith's house. 7. Adjourned at 10 pm. r L '. RESPONSE TO NPO #3 COMMENTS AND OTHER COMMENTS 1. Suggestion: Allow civic organizations to be exempt from appeal fees. Response: It would be more appropriate to separately list the fees and as a tagger to fee statement, list the those organizations that would be exempted from those fees. 2. Suggestion: Mobile Home parks R-3.5 in Single Family areas. Response: Mobile Home parks are listed as a Conditional Use in R-3.5 { zones (R-10) which would require the review of the location of any proposed park in a public hearing. In addition, it allows more alternatives for mobile and manufactured homes which are in demand. 3. Suggestion: Change minor collector to only 2 moving lanes. f Response: Staff agrees with this change since it would be in compliance j with the Comprehensive Plan. i ( 4. Suggestion: Exception to street widths is Established Areas. i 1 F Response: Staff is now in the process of reviewing this issue with the i Public Works Department. 5. Suggestion: Allow restaurants within hotel/motel complexes as separate E f structures. Response: Staff believes this is an appropriate use provided the complex is one parcel of land. r t i e E F F DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 2��U'S'�A 1�5C�. 639-2900 � COUNICIL i STING CITY C-• TIGsRU - August 81 1983 ARTT CL I'V - O Vr RL-Y S CODF�' PUBLIC i �^.t.I�G - C==> 2-3 3 -- IJP name is Geraldine Ball and I am represe:.ting DJB, Inc. and myself p�rscnally. -+ prepared by the City Of Ticar i at 0"1 1 2 re:'uest. Y+'e wish to submit to you a tr2"SCrly' i ^�� l x1_heS CG:.1S �1t1;1;_, hyC'rolo ist the testimony- given �y sir. s�au_ Hughes, trnascript covers r , G. L. Ball at the 'lanninP Coi�.iissiGn meeting and geologist in behalf O DJB, Inc. and � _ ublisl.ed by the on July 12, 1983• rs you will note, his exaJnir_ation shows the map p Tigard to be in F-rror. Ci�y of ig' , thr-oli-C out ,•, rte tllEit ile found n0 ��cu:'Id-wage_ gable E« n You will note from the well rero_ , feet :aeasurement was found on S. W. ''�'d' the area ary closer than +9 feet and the 1,4)K_ a , oir'.. Z _ ,.. man who has lived on W. F;3th for AO :,?r and is Just this week I was talking to a garden and he ins f, �.. _�)nned me presently still using his well for .yaterin� %is inti and withiri,� .:ree blocs they had to go tG a depth of 147 feet for his water. 'He 1-ve' of our property. There is an ir.<_ctive well on our P2cilerty at 121,0 S. o;th wl.ic.- was active until Tig_=sd ':tater District started furni.shir.G water to ti:is location. also on mother cur nurc'r_ase. Thi-s infcrmation f' piece of property there was an act^ve weil at the tim of s_ r= 2 C% tC 1 r t and GG til t +. l .,' l'Ir• i�lJ.of+es at JGi eir. ::.`.� thel.r rec0'_'-'C.S _�.f o0 ., wasn U W1 I able �o the,ells mentioned were drilled before tr=.t time- n , i tl later Cominc, fro:!-- t'-.-- Ford _�r0p'=rtY Onto the This winter we had trio ibl .l but that water has septic t� Lk and broken yips part of 12150 S. W G3 "iI due tO fa�t� - ty but last ,peel: ceased now and recently water develo-ed on tl_e south end- or the rGper f we had a plumber look into the Situc t1 Cn and 11e Z'Oi.I.CI a broken wti' .tcr pipe which is terrig taken care of. y ' tet is presentl;; puttir. in a water pipe t Metz er Water Dis tri. We do want to mention that g- �G rn ^tiI and rack drainage on 68th ve adjoining our property and the ripe bo=le.- f__'E the r_o: under the Pipe is going to the south and there has been considerable floe lear'aiearlast because the pipe is laid starting considerably north of Clin�.on. J T Friday that it is the intention of Metzger Water District to di;usttclae dirt. Asgravelyoucer the pipe and attach to their former line which had no gr=.ve- � Y � be a3i o to flew can see this would mewn that the -water from the north would no longer 1 eWater In vie,: of the fact that the cn�trac-c South so would accumulate. all of file c._tct: in nis sarac neral oricleitwOCJid District have cut into the •. The5 allow for the .,ater to accuL^iu? .:te^and would o� be dca+�aboutl'heosame•locationawhereaMetz er pipe which is runninb north and southand du a ditchrunning East and West causing � Water District trespassed on our property g us to have drainage problem as the water from Landima-rk Ford. drain�bd on Our Prep�ty- G S/LT c h _'d- I- T , 7-7.� 7,c c . ,l r a: s e D _ r Jr� I:i`'one`�oca on on a. W. 6`$ n�Lne, ave�laste� five times and in several other lOCa�iOrS three times. One Buie last week the blast was so strong it s?nt rock a b`uc=fee aT =sf ' away and just missed the gra'id-daughter of people who G .n he .Ouse by same blast of heavy he dark rock was removed and light ented rckhtin the irocicput on the made a ield Of uground ck and instead. T the side of a car. The DJS INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 MPWAX6 b'FdrfWf-My- DEVE:I,OPMEIvT CODE =UBI,IC _ A I :C - CM7 C n, CIL - C�- 2-83 --1,RiLCTE IV - C' !CTS Page 2 Only a couple of pieces of the dark rock landed on our property but the next mor_nir my property by the old oak tree on. the west side of 68th was covered with a lint rock. I was present for all blastings and none went in the northerly direction after the huge blast where the rock just missed the girl. All blastings that I witnessed s and got samples of were the dark rock. T''�e/� \b }.er; tozj�h o hea`,�3' dtrk rock made a huge indentation in the �r!inds2MU, 1�dlie' E 7 We want to mention that a truck-lo_�d of gravel with big pieces of solid clay was brought in and is stored near the end of the rock-based drainage. Also separate cl ay has been brought in. If this is used at the end of the rock-based nine where it meets ; the clay soil it is certain to cause a drainage problem on cur property as this e adjoins the area where Metzger Water District previously trespassed on our property. The property owned by G. L. Bail on the West side of 68th contains an oak tree that is 100-1150 years old according to the tree surgeon. When the Highway Division had the house burned it scortched the t2--unI7 of the tree and killed some of the branches. We had the tree surgeon cut off the dead branches :s we feel this tree should certainly be saved as a landmark. Someone placed copper at ti!e base of the tree but I found it before it did too much damage. Also a huge Nail , s mut in the base of the tree which I had the tree surgeon remove. tasu water has been directed underground in this direc- tion. Also the Highway- Division gut a culvert at the base of the tree wit'rout our # permission which we had removed. I hope the City also feels that tris is a tree worth saving. It is on the loc,.tion of the original farm house of the area.. i We want to mention that part of the property marked as "saturated" en Por, Hughes _nap belongs to Ford. At the time Iyer. Hughes made the retort he thought we owned all the t property to the Ford fence behind the dealership. The Ford dealer ship is built on a { rock pile which means their property on S. W. 62th i g much lower than on S. W. 65th. They own 601 behind the dealership on 68th and we own 1001 . The Ford property is to the East of ours. f Please make this with Mr. H.uehes testimony before the Planning Commission and his reportx of A-pril 29, 1983, along with map, report of Jure 6, 1983 and reports of July 12, 1983, and Well reports part of this Public Hearing on Overlay Districts and City of Tigard I record. t c } R c 'r t f F s. E s TRANSCRIPT PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF MRS. G. BALL PAGE 1 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 12, 1983 - MR. PAUL W. HUGHES TESTIMONY Mr. President, members of the Commission, my name is Paul Hughes, I'm consulting geologist and hydralogist- with offices at 1590 Woodland Terrace in Lake Oswego. I am here representing two entities, one DJB Inc. and the other, Mrs. Ball who is an officer in DJB Inc. , and it concerns property up in the triangle where the new Tigard Interchange is taken place and it is a problem concerning your, uh, within your comprehensive plan/sensitive land overlay. There is a map that was constructed in 1977 by the City of Tigard showing areas of flooding and, uh, wetlands and, uh, part of this overlay does show, it uh, it infringes upon some of the property owned by DJB Inc. I made an examination of the property. There is indeed some water problem up there, but that is a failing septic tank belonging to Landmark Ford and has nothing to do with the wetland, and if that was corrected, the problem would be solved. I did go ahead and make an examination of the property. Uh, in the three, uh, there are three issues in which you cover in your sensitive lands. One of them is the 100-year floodplain. This is, obviously property is not within the floodplain. The second issue is, is it within a natural drainageway, and the trouble with that is that there is no definition of the word 'drainageway' in any standard text in hydrology, so I simply made one up for you and put it in here and if the Planning Department doesn't like it, you can turn it around or what ever you like, but I'm looking at drainageways as "those areas which convey significant seasonal concentrations of water over the surface of the i lard" that is the only thing that I could think of. PRESIDENT TEPEDINO: Isn't that pretty close to what the code says? MR. HUGHES: Oh, it says Chapter 18.57, defines drainageways in this manner, the term drainageway is not used in the handbooks of applied hydrology, so I'm i.icluding, pardon me, I'm also including a section on sheet flooding which takes place seasonally. The property is free of these three problems and so stated, and I have discussed this with the Director and then have gone on in the study a little further to include other properties ; one, uh, two pieces of property held separately from DJB Inc. by Mrs. Geraldine Ball, and I have covered the same topics, they are adjacent properties and therefore I believe would answer the, the problems that might be faced at this site. I've made a map of the areas that, uh, were wet during the winter months, that is the month of April, which is almost anytime this time of year, this year at least. Also, I made a study of the water levels of all the existing wells I could find in the general area to determine the actual location of the ground-water table throughout that area and have found that the ground-water,- ,n table in no place is closer than 49 feet. Uh, (a few words were mumbled at 7, w �� ,� this point and indistinguishable to transcriber) that 's the closest of any of the water-tables in that area. I would like to submit a series of four re orts to planning or to ourself, and the I' ll try to answer an questions P , P g Y � Y Y 9 which you might have and would be willing to come over and discuss this with &,cc the Planning Director or anybody, and go into the field concerning this ATT�c/,c) l property. As you know, construction is taking place there at the present �... time, and the waters that there is, there is a drainageway there, a man-made drainageway apparently at the time that I-5 was put in. Due to the construction, that drainageway has been some what destroyed and water is being discharged now upon the Ball property. And we have letters and have discussed this with the Highway Department and they are going to convey that water TRANSCRIPT PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF MRS. G. BALL PAGE 2 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 12, 1983 - MR. PAUL W. HUGHES TESTIMONY adjacent to the, uh, the uh, 68th, SW 68th, which will be the approach to the on-ramp south-mound. None of that water will be on any private land, or any other lands other than adjacent to.. .we believe we have handled all the questions that my, uh, that might concern the uh, the sensitive land issue on this project. PRESIDENT TEPEDINO: Thank you sir. (lw/0713A) u itis l NOTICE 13 WATER R'ELL CO:TRAC3tOR ; ^ i-- � V The oricmal and first copy �i ` i 'WATER WELL REPORT of this report are to be S . - State Well No. .-....._ filed with the J . .;,T—r-- ENG!H .... --- '-5'�� OF OREGON State STATE ENGINEER. SALEM. OREGON 9731P M OP F,=V f4lease type or print) within 30 days from the date State Permit No. ........_._..-......_..._.....-._____.- of well completion. OWNER: (11) WELL TESTS• Drawdown is amount water]evel� \1) ( ) lowered below static lever'-1 Name q Was a pump test made?X Yes ❑ No If yes, by whom? Address f .6 yield: Bal/min with ?-ft. drawdown after b-- (2) LOCATION' OF WELL: ,� VBailer test gal./min- with it. drawciown after hrs. County �.( 6 Driller's well number Artesian flow g.p.m. Date {14 `i Section T. R. �t'M_ Temperature of water Was a chemical analysis made? ❑Yes 56No Bearing and e f distance section subdivision or sudicorner _ _ � � � � (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing----••�•�• tt. t� Depth drilled / ft. Depth of completed well //9Qj Formation-Describe by color,character size of material and structure,and show thickness of aquifiers and the kind and nature of the material in each stratum penetrated, with at least one entry for each change of formation. MATEMAL FROM TO (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): � C� (y,, 3Well Deepening❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon ❑ hndonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF AVELL: Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Domestic R Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Cable .z Jetted ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well El Other [3Dug ❑ Bored ❑ G� 2 (6) CASIl\rGr INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded t � Diana.from —�._ — ft.to `1_ft. Gage �.��-C�- '"�� C _ 'Diam.from . - —_it.to—--- it. Gage -. --•----- 7 Diam.from ft.to —......—.._.._it. Gage ` -- (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? C Yes No Type of perforator used Size of perforations in. by in. r /Q perforations from ------ St. to —_............---•-..... ft. perforations from_.— -- ft. to _---------------- --- ft. z — 1— perforations from .Y._-------------------- ft. to _..._....................— ft. perforations from _—•--•-•-"---.----it. to __.---...__.—•-_-- ft. -��perforations from--..._-.............._. ft. to - -----...._.—.._— ft. (8) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yes tW No Manufacturer's Name ——_.._._._._.___...-------- --._.-...._. _.._....._... ---------•--.. Model No. Slot size __--.....____ Set from .-......_............ it. to _......_.--..____" it. Rork started 6.1)y19 Completed Z Diam- Slot size — Set from .._......_........._.it. to ........-- ---------- ft. / t Dare well drilling machine moved off of well (9) CONSTRUCTION: (13) PUMP: Well seal—Material used in seal __._...i�. .4.. .........................---- Manufactur G. .---------•-------------------..... /�/ - -- er' Va .e Depth of seal -_-.-.--�--- -....---- it. Was packer used? ------------ TYPe= ....-•--•-----• •---•------•- H.P. _�.. _.. Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal ..........,1_.y-7...__._ in. Water Well Contractor's Certification: Were any loose strata cemented off?❑Yes gr No Depth ....................... Was a drive shoe used? ❑Yes pi No This well -vas drilled ut-lder my jurisdiction and this report is s Was well gravel packed? ❑Yes Pk No Size of gravel: .............__ true to the besti my o ledge and bei• f. Gravel placed from_ _ _ _._ -._ _ft.to............. ...._._...._.-it. NAM]; erson,f or curpora t'on) ypc p id any strata contain unusuabie water? ❑ Yes 63 No 7 a'ype of water? depth of strata AddreS=y/�� '� ...... 'r d ..../ --• .. Method of sealing strata oft _ Drilling Machine Operator's Li seri-- -----•---••-----......... (10) WATER LEVELS: ` Signed] •.... ..-•--_. .._.._sr . Static]eve 1 it. below land surface Date l--L�t! ---. ((Wate.r. Well contract_ .....ir) Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch Date Contractor's License No.Off-7. Date ...........7�ai.P......, 19..W. (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) - •`.1 r+ � its )a '.� t� state.Well No ...... =...... .. .... .. . WATER WELL REPORT JUN8 1993 'TATE OF OREGON State Permit No. VIA-TER RESOURCES ®Eff. Sr.I:..11. OL..::_,7l (1) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL: crte Name [10}^11 ani C County Cl-i ^ a5- Driller's-ell number 7-93 ': Ko,^R .- S3 'ti I:ii v.seetion 6 T. 2S R l+u w.M Address '0 S.i :C`.jOndO 1�OT't.1271n State OR �''7 �1 Tax Lot# Lot Blk Subdivision City13707 S;1 Rod-ers Rd. Address at well location, (2) 'TYPE OF WORK (check): ?0rtlnnc3 (fir?rron New Well Z: ' Deepening 0 Reconditioning 0 Abandon-0 (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. If abandonment.describe material and procedure in Item 12. 53• ft Depth at Which water was fust found -�-^Z (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Static level 11L ft.below land surface.Date ' Municipal ❑ Artesian rrssure lbs.per square inch-Date Rotary Aw ❑ Dr,—n ❑ pcmtstic YJ- Indust..- '� p Rotary Mud ., Dug ❑ irrigation ❑ Test%.'ell ❑ Other ❑ _ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing .............................. C ]� Bored ❑ 'ihcrmal� withdrawal ❑ Reinjection ❑ r r fL Depth drilled 55 5j ft. Depth of completed well r7 5 ( -CASING INSTALLED: Steel M Plastic Formation:Describe color•texture.grain size and structure of matenals,and show Threaded 0 Welded ly thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,with at least one entry 25p --••--- for each change of formation-Report each change in position of Static Water Level 7 6-.--Diam.frornD.1 ..-1-ft.to-.S�Ct•--...ft. Gauge a... . ............... .-.... ca and indite principal water-bearing strata. - "Diam.from............... .to...--........ ft -.ft. Gauge .............................. ' MATERfAL From To SNWLIC ". LIFTER INSTALLED: i r�r r _ ••r s_ - r�, ro: 0 21 ~ -Diem from ft-to ^..i7.. .ft. Gauge -� �1 V 2l h1 / pori r a l a a • ted - (6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? Yes ❑No L,. ^ l 1�2 JI of perforator used ri'Oin. l r '^ 1 12 Size of perforations, 1 in.by 16' 178 .-..-_...J`J---....perforationsfrom.7�.:...-...it-to....-..�......ft. i"1�'7-�r0_�'Ti 1 272 ...........................perforationsfrnm..-...-...._..-ft.to...............ft- Jl rr-cr...:-r--.-,rO'.7 r1 292 207 ` ................................................... perforations from....-.-....-...ft.to...............ft. Jl �_,-, l 1� 29 (7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? 1]Yes X Pio C1''T- T•a`T Manufacturer'sName '--••...........................Type ............. Model No...........----....... r f Diem. ........................ Slot Size............bet from...............ftto...............ft. �1�-•-ro-T .ft-to.-..-.--.. ^= • 1 _ Diam. Slot Size............Set from.............. ft. C1 a-- o '� Drawdow-Lr is amount water level is lowered C1g-•r-'--r:nut=r-1Jr 0-+-^- t�: �` (8) WELL TESTS.• below static leve] S^ o- r«n-r- rC:yrl �' 979 Was a um test made? ❑Yes No If yes,by whom- .--- _ r�O -Lill alJmin with it.dtawdownafrer C� hrs. r -�1 ^�^?_t 7'7?1 Ajr test gal.imin.with drill stem at ft. hrs. Bailer test 20 jE2edin.with 7 2!.{t drawdown after l hm. Artesian flow m- i �3 Depthartesiannowencountered....-.-.....ft. Work started li-29 19 33 Competed �-7 19::3 i nature of water -��-' j ' Date well drilling machine moved off of well ]-' 19 ? f (9) CONSTRUCTION: Special standards: Yes Ty No 0 n ...a •-r.9' t4-...... Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: nt--�-. .......................... Well scat-Material used .:fie::->---- - R'ellsealed from land surr;see to.......................11...8................-.....................ft. This was wrrsk [under y direct su tvisiott Materials used 1 and info aI) re abov a*o co st knowledge and belief. Well in- o Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal.-.._....-. l� i [Signed] '- ,. -: ................Date 5.-�.....,19:?-.._ Diameter of well bore below seal.............. .....in. (Drilling rt n r................................... t Number of sacks of cement used in well seal ...............................�1--- Drilling Machine Operator's License No. How was gement grout placed? .':' J'- ..-#< ^l il••�.-1.7ch..q-_Y`•,-•,, t •ce 0-1rsG;1..A O� ...?ZIG�.-. -?�+ .}7--.G�..'.......... ............... Water Well Contractor's Certification: , S1�•t�t.- 22-.� -- This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to i -.-........ ...................... the best of my knowledge and belief. _ - Waspumpitutalled?-.27�..................Iype.-....-.....IIP.-..... �pch-...-.-.. ft ..;ld _:_eConcell..��i}?.8...bST=-,'T111•• �5 -c:- Name .:..:....... i ` Was a drive shoe used? C S Yes ❑No Plugs...�......-Size:location...-....-.-.ft. (Person.firm or carpo ation) 7 Address3�-�..�y._nolVX11 'v'..ic.`T'.- .r:7I�J3»kj_2..._.Q�.. .T......n Did any strata contain unusable water? O Yes .N Nn f of Water? de th of strata [Signed] '.. �6iX4t�;� ........................Method of seali strata off r we > 8 Size of gravel: Contractors LicenseNo...._...�._...Dmte_ �-......._.......19.'.- Was well gravel packed.. ❑Yes �b�do .........._. • Gravel placed from........................ft-tn-......-.--.-..-........ft. WATERRESOURCES DEPARTMENT. �`1'•-�K'�' WP NOTICE TO WATER WELL.CONTRACTOR SALEM.OREGON 97310 T { he o„riginaf and Casia t copy of ihreport date of well completion. are to be filed with the within 30 days from the ¢ F STA'n.OF OltEGO-N APR 61983 State Permit No .......... . ... . .__. . PLEASE TYPE ort )JT-e FNfttOURCES ®EPT. fl) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF LL: .ame John Hedlund County Clackamas Driller'.--ell number Address 240 S. W Birdshill Loop SE NW US.-ction 6 T. 2 W R 1 E. W.M' City Portland Oregon 972tt3te Tax Lot# Lot Bit. Subdivision Address at well location: (2) TYPE OF WORT{ (check): New Welles Deepening❑ Reconditioning p Abandon U1) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. If abandonment.describe material and procedure in Item 12. Depth at which water was first found 12!:) ft (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Static level 40 ft.below land surface.Date 4/4/83 Rotary Air= Driven Ilk—estio ?CX lnd—tnal _ Vutnnrml ❑ Artesian pressure lbs.per square inch.Date Rntary Mud D Dug M Irrigation O Test\4e❑ :D Other ^ fiortd ^ Thermd: withdrawal O Retnjeet-r, ❑ 6t1 -,,,•, � (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of 1.7.5.- .�tt. ;r Depth drilled 200 ft. Depth of completed well (5) CASING INSTALLED: Steel ❑ Plastic Xy. Formation:Describe color,texture,grain size and structure of materials:and show Threaded ❑ Welded XX thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,with at least one entry 6..."Dian.from=...--+i......ft.t........5.0...ft. Gauge PVC-720-0.. .......... for each change of formation.Report each change in position of Static Water Level ........... Diam-from...............ft.to...............ft. Gauge .............................. and indicate principal water-bearing strata. LINER INSTALLED: MATERIAL From To s.T ......4.....Diam.from.......5.......ft.to.....1.7.55....ft. Gauce .PVC-200 Brown clay-occ. rock fres ents 0 6 Gray-brown boulders & rock 6 (6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? N Yes ❑ Na Gray-brown basalt fractured i'_�w of perforator used Drill hard 9 22 Size of perforations 3/8" in.V,. diameter in. 120 115 175......ft. Brown basalt dirt occ.soft 22 25 ...................perforattonsfrom... fc-to-.. .. Black-brown basalt & lava ...................................................Wrforationsfrom...............ft.to...............ft. coarse grained 25 40 ................. ...... pertorationsfrom...............ft.to...............ft- Black basalt odd. dirtV brow (7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yes S:No streaks 40 80 vlamtfacturer•sName .................................................................................... Red-brown & black basalt stre ks80 95 Type ........................................................................ Model No...................... Gray basalt hard coarse Diam. ........................ Slot Size............Set from...............ft-to...............ft. grained 95 155 w.b. Diam. ........................ Slot Size............Set from................ft.to-..............ft- Red clay & claystone 155 170 (8) WELL TESTS- Drawdown is amount water level is lowered Brown clay—sticky 170 200 below static level tt s ump test made? ❑Yes XX No If ves,by whom? 111`i\-'jo• 1 gal/min with 129 ft.drawdown after 2 hrs. it - Air test gal./min.with drill stem at ft. hrs. Sailer test eal./min.with ft.drawdown after hrs. esinn flow .m. '�e nperature of water Depth artesian flow encountered..........-.ft. started 4/1/83 19 Comolett-d 4/4/83 19 Work (9) CONSTRUCTION- Special standards: Yes❑ No JC Date well drilling machine moved off of well 4/4/83 19 well seal—Material used ...........CemA.nt..grOUt...p1US---gel................ (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification (if applicable)-. Well sealed from land surface to...............5.0................................................. ft. This well was constructed under my direct supervision.Materials used Diameter of well bore to bottom of sea)..........�.0.......in. t0 25 t r 850� O and information reported above are true to my best knowledge and belief. [Signed] ..................................................................Date..................,19 Diameter of well bore below seal..........6........in. . . Number of sacks of cement t-sed in well seal .............1.0............................ sacks Bonded Nater Well Constructor Certification: How was cement grout placed? Pumped through-•casing...cqt .5.0•!. Bond Issuedby: Great American Insures to round...level """ter' s„tetyc"n,pn"yNa 8........ ......................... ......................... This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to ..................................................................................................................... the best of my knowledge and belief. Was pump installed?.......n0.............Type............HP............Depth............ft. Name A.r....M1:...SMNNUN...WELT-... ...Inc................ Was a drive shoe used? ❑Yes IXNo Plugs .n Size:location............ft. Pen "•f,rrn nr mqp t, n" ��°r pnnt Did any strzta contain unusable water? ❑Yes IONo Addres[Signeds. 07.5. ..W`Tg4jptin.•Valley...fIwy,_,....Qloh-a......OR..... �'pe of Water depth of strata Method of sealing strata off water well a xutrunnr �C,�� A,Jga Sttl Date 4/..4!83..•.........19 Was well gravel packed? O Yes XXNo Size of gravel:..................... ••••••••••••• Gravel placed from........................ft.to........................ft. NOTICE TO WATER VSELL CONSTRUCTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SP-45292raI The original and first Dopy of this report SALEM.OREGON 97310 are to be filed with the writhin 30 days from the date of well completion. NU 111..E ♦V ..s y •� � +• a '�� 1 The ortrinal and first copy WATER WELL REPORT of this report are to be `n '�'7 G tate Well No. `� t'� - .`-{- H F 1, `3 I� .� • filed with the STATE OF QK'C•IiON � —......._t ....... STATE ENGINEER. SALEM. OREGON 97310 (Please type or print) STATLE Eh:SlN=jS;ate Permit No. within 30 days from the date (Do not write above this line) of well completion. -�nLi.•.. 'r: �.•i, i (10) LOCATION OF WELL: �t) OWNER: �� . I \A < Driller's well number/ Name �� S � AeZ ,�S tW% Section T aS R Address •s r WIZ Bearing and distance lrom section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): Reconditioning D Abandon ❑ New Well I$ Deepening ❑ If abandonment. describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL'• Completed well. !t. (3) TYPE OF i;*ELL (4) PROPOSED USE (check), Depth at which water was first found c5Z,6 !' ft. below land surface. Data Rotary U Driven ❑ Domestic � Industrial D Municipal C1 =2 level r% X Cable ❑ Jetted ❑ lbs. per square inch. Date Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well D Other ❑ Artesian pressure l �t ,t �7 (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing •--•0 Y'._�------... ' CASING INSTALLED: Threaded p welded r r 2 �n �* f�j/f C;.3.5.:'._- -_7� ft Depth of completed well it. Diam. from __._ --- !L. Gage .... Depth drilled —. 1�_......._. it. to -.-• -- ...._ ft. to ft. Gage - --- ___.__' Warn. from •-•--"'-"""-'"" Formation: Describe color, texture, grain size and structure o! materials: __ 1t. to ----------....._ _ 'Diam. from _ -_----------•-•---•-- ft. Gage - and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated. _...._. -"- with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change to position aJ Static Wet No. er Level. and indicate principal water-bearing strata. ; PERFORATIONS: Perforated? ❑ Yes From TO swl, Jlype of perforator used v`Z in.by Size of perforations in. ��C►V� ��• O ft. to ------.....__._........... it. perforations from ------------- ------ perforations from ---•--•- --.-..-.._ ft. to _....-............ - n' ey Y�.aS 4 _.-.._..-..........--.. r •-----•---.............. Perforations from ................................ ft. to -- (7) SCREENS: WeU screen installed? D Yes No s! S// ¢CU/ danufacturer's Name ----_-_- ---- - S �T �?G Sdyr►s S pr Type -... - --- - ------ --- Model No. - ------ --- 6 - -- Dram. -............. Slot size ........_...... Set from . ft to ... - - ft. .. ft. S.ot size ft. to ... t Diam. .-------•-•--•- ' •�-----•--•-- Set from ..-•---••-�----- ' (8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static level Was a pump test made? ]g Yes D No It yes by whom? hrs. Yield: �� gal./min with '�� ft. drawdown after r� w i Bailer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after lits- Artesian flow g.P.m. ac 19 ' 19 Completed 3 _ ` � - tt. work started Q40 N iiperatvice of watet✓�` 'DePIlt artesian flow encountered ..-_ _ 19 '7f . Date well drilling machine moved off of well r<< (9) CONSTRUCTION: ,va ro✓ Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: :. Well seal—Material used —`'-�''-•'—`�/'N---- This well was constructed under my direct supervision• gt well sealed from land surface to .----- -•-� ---- -"- -- Materials us and inforMat=on ort2� above are true t0 IItT best kno edg and belief. p// _._._�.----... in. - Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal � .- / [Signed �`...!J�'- ..'.-....-erator) ---mete 4:.-._.-. in. rotor) 5 Diameter at well bore below seal _..... . /tDrultzLs taae a operator) -- --- - � p.:7 Number of sacks of cement used in well seal r. . sacks Drilling Machine Operators License No. Number of sacks of bentonite used in well seal ..------•------•-•-----•----•---- sacks ---._..._._.-..__----_ -----......•. `Fater Well Contractor's Certification: Brand name of bentonite Number of pounds of bentonite per 100 gallons This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is lbs./100 gals, true tg.i-l:� best y lcno ledge and belief F of water ••--------- ... -- --- - - Ras a drive shoe used? D Yes Id No Plugs..-.-• Size: location !tName ? fi r corporation) (Type or p X ; Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes J No �kr�// Address Type of water? depth of strata /!_,�a.. _..F�b--- �L�---•�`- Method of sealing strata off [Signed .•--- •••••. (Water Well ll Contractor) ry Was well gravel Contractor's License Packed? D Yes No Size of gravel: ...._......._..-_.. ._ � Date ...! -----------+ 19 7 J No. .. Gravel placed from ft. to (VISE ADDITIONAL SIIJElETS IF NECESSARY) \OT:CE TO \SA:El' The original and first copy ci this re,,Ort WATER WELL REPORT _ are to be filed with the STATE OF OREGON State Well No- _.. __....... _/... _.....-- --� WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. (plesse type or print) SALEM. OREGON 97310 State Permit No. -----.-_...__--•--------•-- ----- w•tthin 30 days from the date (Do not write above this line) of well completion. - (1) OWNER• (10) LO•�y/��C�ATION OF WELL: County y � Driller's well number *7 tesll'' w L, W.M. Name ��/r�9CJ t �A Section f T.;?- w Address o��4 �� Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well ❑ Deepening:K Reconditioning ❑ Abandon D If abandonment. describe material and procedure in Item 12. (Y1) WATER LEVEL: Completer well. (3) TYPE OF WE'LL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found --Q'74- 3 fit* A it'Q Rotary V Driven C) Domestic � Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Static level — �e� ft below land surface Date 1t` —J EC-le ❑ Jetted ❑ ❑ Bored [3 irrigation rr"l Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date (5) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded ❑ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing ..__-w�o77~-••----•-- _ ft. Gage -..-.._.....—....-.- 1_3C) ft. Depth of completed well �L ta. n• _................ Diam. from _.....�/}'/� tt ......_. Depth drilled -.... --- ...'�.'--•- .............. Formation: Describe color. texture. grain size and structure of materials: Diam. from ....... to ........ ft. Gage / d. :4a ft. Gage and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrate Diam. from it. to - """ ' with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in position of Static water Level and indicate principal water-bearing strata. .(6) PERFORATIOI`S: Perforated? ❑ Yes ANO. From To swl.. MATERIAL Type of perforator used Size of perforations ..._.... perforations from .....—_._..—_.._.—..---- ft. to ...............•_•.••-._- 00/ -.---.• perforations from ....... ft. to ..... ft. .. perforations from ............ it. to ............................... ft. - (7) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes bf NO Manufacturer's Name ... ......----""""""'""'".—........... --------------------- Model No- Diam. Slot size ................ Set from •---......----"•-- Diam. ..... Slot size--------- Set from ...................... ft. to ........................ ft. 7 r- n. (8) WELL TESTS' Drawdown is amount water level u !owered below static level a pump test made? tiYes ❑ NNo/ If yes, by whoni?®Acr,0`A CdC eld �C gal/min with / ft iirawdown after �. hrs. WATER R E S O tU B^filer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. • a.�sian flow ¢•p•m- 07 ft. Work started 19��Completed "� a O� 19 Temperature of wate�3 aDepth artesian flow encountered -.---.--_. ry � i Date well drilling machine moved oft of well '7 14) 29 (0) CONSTRUCTION: Well seal—Material used --__... ......................_.............. .... Drilling Machine operator's Certification: �� i� This well was constructed under Irrrl' direct supervision. Well sealed from land surface to .. - - - ft. Materials and V. at at _ above are true to m: best icn led and belieDiameter of well bore to bottom of sealDiameter of well bore below seal .......... in. [Signed , rll�ate (Drlllln): Mach a Operator) Number of sacks of cement used in well seal .................................... ..... sacks How was cement grout placed? ...._ ._.........._..1. Drilling Machine Operator's License No. p.. -•---•--•••-•-•---......•-"' _. __ _............... Water Well Contractor's Certification: .............................. ..... _................ ... ....................... .......... This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true toest o� kedge e ( o and Was a drive shoe used? ❑Yes ❑ No plugs ............ Size: location ............ ft. Name e. on, firm. orporauon) or Q/ Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes No _ �� r Address '�W. . W�...••. ---•- Type of water? depth of strata • ....... ''•'...."� Afethod of sealing strata off [Signed} (urer Well ontracior) Was well gravel packed? ❑ Yes NO Size of gravel: ................................ .Y_. Date •- 10•-••-• --. 19_ Gravel placed from _ et. to ft. Contractor's License No. . �` (IISE ADDITIONA1. SHFIF.TC.YYr+•+�-^^^ ^"' --+ NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRACTOR The original and first copy "�./ /F,11 � VATER 'WELL REPORT of this report are to be './ '�{_ a j - _ :.. --_-_---- STATE with the --7 re_r OF OREGON State Well No. ...-_..-....----------_......T.._....---- 'STATE ENGINEER. SALEM.OREG N10, F►' ? r __;(` (• a type or print! within 30 days from the date v 7. p )(Do not write above this line) State Permit No. .......................................------.- of well completion. . ! f €'�`!.fol4ir• ,1) OWNER: (11) LOCATION OF WELL: Name !L-LtUre. Audrey Bake Coun•Elaelca rias Driller's well number 57-62 Address 2L250 S ':+ 6cth Tualatin Or. 97052 !: Ivrri !: Section 5 T. 2S R. lE W.M. _ Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well)] Deepening❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ If abandonment. describe material and procedure in Item 12. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing .. 6!t... --- ----. Rotary ❑ Driven Q Cable (S[ Jetted ❑ Domestic Industrial ❑ ATuniclpa] ❑ Depth drilled 250 St. Depth of completed well 250 ft. Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Formation: Describe color. texture. grain size and structure of materials: //'''' and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated. CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded ' with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change LL 0 C 250---. in position of Static Water Level as drilling proceeds. Note drilling rates. V.." Diam. from I-------- ft. to .--.------..�.------- ft. Gage .......r... ................ Diam. from ........................ ft. to ft. Gage ......--..............-. MATERIAL From To swL Diam. from ........................ it. to ........................ ft. Gage O,-n"e C_?- 0 , PERFORATIONS: Perforated?❑ Yes No. Broken rOC ari . C� Rocker meas_ ae of perforator used 0 I Size of perforations in. by Rock, rvd e r lrd, Q _-........._-•--_..-.. perforations from - _.-.-_..____. ft. to _.............................. n. Rock, ham, e 2 L 3-36 136L 139 ..... perforations from ---------------•---------- ft. to ------------------------- !t. LZOC;' ,q� .. ,7S7T1 ----__._---'---'- perforations from ....__.-.----..__..---.. ft. to ------------------------------ H• Rock, ha °' l perforations from -_.--__---__.._----._..-. ft- to ........................... -- tt. AO k m3 d h air d b 11 80 - .................... perforations from -------------------------------- ft. to --- --------... ft. Rock} hard,—gray 180 2 0 118 1) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes IX No Manufacturer's Name ............._................•.----------------'--_..----............................ .............. Type................................................................................. Model No. .._.... --------.................. _-- �— Diam. ................ Slot size --------------- Set from ..:.......----------_ ft. to --------------- ft. Diam. ................ Slot size ................ Set from ......................__ ft. to ..................----- ft. - — (8) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. _ — Static level 118 ft. below )and surface Date 9-3-69 fan pressure lbs. per square inch Date WELL TESTS' Drawdown is amount water level is (9) lowered below static level Was a pump test made?❑ Yes 70 No If yes. by whom? -- Work started Aug. 1g 1969 Completed Stat. 15 1969 al./min. w y )Pfd: ith ft. drawdown after hrs. Date well driifing machine moved off of well Sent. 16 1969 _ - Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: This well was constructed under my direct supervision. Mate- Bailer test I Ft gal/mtn. with 75 ft. drawdown after 1 hrs• rials used and information reported above are true to my best Artesian flow g.p.m. Date knok ledge. `db}enclie Temperature of water SljOWas a chemical analysis made? O Yes CZNo [Signed] -=� '��+'"--rte-•- DdteSG�7t....2� 1 7.9... )Dri!f c Machine Op=rator) (10) CONSTRUCTION: Drilling Machine Operator's License No. ...........39.9........................... Well seal-DTaterial used ........_...........t Cnt7T11te___.................. - Depth of seal ...................................---------------------------------------40 ....... ft. Water Well Contractor's Certification: Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal -----------------10....... in. This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Were any loose strata cemented off? Q Yes N No Depth .................. NAMES.t012:;tA.^.._22708.a.---•--••-•------------•--•-------•-------••----------------•---...... 'vas a drive shoe used? 1p Yes ❑No (Person. firm or corporation) ('type or print) Laid any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes ]0 No _ 5112 S.E.?SCLOugrilin,hilwaukie,Or. 97222 Addres� ...................................................._.........-••---•----.._._....._......_........... Type of water? depth of strata Method of sealing strata off [Signed] i�J'L- - ---•v'-� --- -••-•-- - I (Water Wrll Contractor) Was well gravel packed? ❑Yes No Size of gravel: ................................ Gravel placed from ................................ ft. to ..--......... ft. Contractor's License No. .... ........ Dates�P{„ 23 . 196 9 (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) �: :. : r. •.: . ;'fit k, i I'i ATEA NN-ELL REPORT _ R /i- RATER RESOURCES DEPART4E2IT. 2 �., -- STATE OF OftEGOti State Well No. .:2:-.. .! ..•.......l.J.L'1 . SAL£:.I. OREGON 5310 (P)ease type or print) within 30 days from yTERe RESOURCES DEPT. State Permit No. of well completion. SALEM, OREGON 1130 not write above this line) Q) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL: ame I!rs. Audrey B"ke County ClRckq-mqs Driller's well number 57-69 (79) Address 2L250 S. :Y. 5th kve•, Tlaln.tin, Ore. N7 % Section 6 T. 2s R. lE W.M. ------- Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well ❑ Deepening 52 Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ If abandonment. describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed Well. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first found 342 ft_. Rotary -4] Driven ❑ Domestic zi Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Static level 185 ft. below land surface. Date3/20/79 Cable ❑ Jetted ❑ Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date ( "ASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded ❑ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing .......6................ --- Diam. from ........................ ft. to .............. ft. Gage ........................ Depth drilled 360 ft. Depth of completed well 36o ft- * Diam. from ....................... ft. to ........................ it. Gage ..........•............ — -' Formation: Describe color, texture. grain size and structure of materials: ...................Diam. from ........................ ft. to ........................ ft. Gage ........................ and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated. with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in PERFORATIONSPerforated? Q Yes {'j No. position of Static Water Level and indicate principal water-bearing strata. Type of perforator used MATERIAL From To SWL Size of perforations in. by in. Basalt hard _e 250 329 -.............................. perforations from .....—....--............_.. ft. to ..........----••------------ ft. Basalt grey and brown 329 342 .............................. perforations from ..........-................ ft. to .....—_._------------ ft• Basalt black and brown Soft perforations from ............................... ft. to ............... n. 20 -'pm 342 351 185 (7) SCREENS: well screen installed? ❑ Yes Q No Basalt Grey Hard 351 36o Manufacturer's Name .---_—...._...----------------------....---.........•.............. ( -pe ___....—.........--__................----•—•--.-- Model No. _......—..._....................... FON- the oriFinn.l drilling low efer to our well Diam. _—............ Slot size ...___.___.._Set from ........................ ft. to ......_................ ft. r e Dort A57-69, e.at e d S e Dt a mD e r 23, i 969. Diam. ................ Slot size -............_Set from ........................ ft. to ....................--- ft. (8) lvv*'ELL TESTS• Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static level Was a pump test made? ❑Yes [$No If yes, by whom? Yield: gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. Bail@imt 20 gal./min. with 170 ft. drawdown after 1 hrs. Artesian flow 9.p-m. 7t erature of water Depth artesian Pow encountered .... ........ ft. Work started 3/19 29 79 Completed .12c) 1979 -(99) CONSTRUCTION: Date well drilling machine moved off of well 33/20 1979 Well seal—Material used .............. Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: Well sealed from land surface to ..................... .......................... ........... ft. This well was constru ted under my direct supervision. """'""'"' Materials used and information reported above are true to my Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal .... ......................... in. best kn0"e anl bell \ Diameter of well bore below seal .............. ............. in. 1•*,�`�� Y.- `„` (Signed]") t-J`�- `•�,. .---- .- Date ......3�2b---� 1s..7.y. Number of sacks of cement used in well seal ........... .... sacks D�riiel V. Y'itBl' Y1CStachine Op ator) _...... 718 How was cement grout placed? --..... ........... .... ....... Drilling Machine Operator's License No. ............................................ .. ... .. . .......... ......_.................__..._..................................... _ .... ------- ...... Water Well Contractor's Certification: .... ............................................................... .... ........_.._...__... _.. ..................... ................_.................................................................-.......I.........._.. -.__...........__....................- This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true 4o the best Of my knowledge and belief. Was a drive shoe used? ❑Yes 0 No Plugs ............ Size: location ........- ft. Stelnnan hr05 . Drilllri Co. Name _._....... = ......... •----••.•• ................... j d any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes � No (Peron. firm or c.Wworatlon) (Type or yrint) \ Type of water? - depth of strata Address .3023__S...... __1Filw., Ore. 97222 ............................ Method of sealing strata oft [Signed] -��': .. .:..�c�.� ..........._................. [..Was well gravel packed? ❑ Yes ( No Size of gravel: Ronald F. McConnell (Water well Contractor) Gravel placed from .. _.._........_.. ft. to ...... .. ........... ft. Contractor's License No. .... Date YfrCh_�9..............� 1979 ;USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) SP•45R98-119 i P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES omccnPpRAT60 1590 WOODLAND TERRACE LAKE OSWEGO.OREGON 9703=. Telephone 503 — 636.2523 April 29, 1983 D.J.B. Inc. 11515 S.W. 91st Ave. Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Drainage Study, D.J.B. Inc. Property Within S.E. lk Sec. 36, TIS, R1W and N.E. 4 Sec. 1, TZS, R1W Gentlemen: At your request I have conducted a reconnaissance survey of D.J.B. Inc. properties adjacent to the Landmark Ford Agency on S.W. 66th Avenue. Purpose of the investigation is to determine the source and disposition of surface waters within the area, especially in relationship to the proposed construction of the I-5 Haines Interchange. The natural surface drainage at the D.J.B. Inc. property is southwester- ly. Over the years the drainage has been modified to accomodate develop- ment and improvements. At the present time, surface runoff from the east side of I-5 is carried beneath I-S and S.W. 66th Avenue to a drainage way which flows westerly immediately north of the D.J.B. Inc. property. Some of the runoff is carried by storm sewer and ditches from areas be- yond the natural surface drainage. On April 21st, 1983, I discussed the future drainage plan with the Oregon Department of Transportation survey crew working at the Haines Interchange site. The party chief informed me that the plan is to channel the runoff parallel to I-5 to the I-5 - Highway 217 Interchange. The distribution of surface water on the D.J.B. Inc. property as of April 21st is shown on the enclosed map. The small area of saturated soil in t GEOLOGY - HYDROLOGY -2- the northern part of the property is surface runoff along the drainage way which receives it's flow from east of I-5. The larger area of satur- ated surface soil is caused by a septic tank failure and possibly other waters from the Landmark Ford Agency. In summary, the D.J.B. Inc. property, historically was not an area of wet- lands. The problem of poor drainage and soil saturation in a limited area are the product of changes in land-use over the past 20 to 25 years. I will be available for further assistence on an as-needed basis. Respectfully, c�STIFI a �•c�C l �!�� ®RECON C �/ I W.HUGF ES Paul W. Hughes, �"" u EIS Engineering Geologist ��G' `y NG PhWah . Encl. —E C w N.r r. c.`F.: C.% :Fv-ILL �► •t f�i.�'_ L 1 y �ayOE r.i 3�`57E toot► L � ,t' ( A T .7�• 1 . 0' i r V �l=ST(•� 100.x: / 1� 1 U E1-'3C5 --:,1 yti : BAL14 E c 1 LI, 'S. W y.�i it1 �' ,-,r,�V 1 1 J.L•�. 1I� ADA 67- r �� ' •�R FOG.�£TI" •�L iFN:; 'jz CALL ? ' - 447 Z. vi ^ .01 '� �, st•so�• a fir: KJ. =59.-"_:. _ � 1• b• 1 � � i I� ! ��1 1•T a Y ~� 1` LJ / r r$ 1 J0 s ivP. . HUGHES &W0 LAKE OSWEGO.GREG TeW*Xxw 603 - June 6, 1983 ~� D.J.B. Inc. 11515 S.W. 91st Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Development Suitability, D.J.B. Property Adjacent vacated S.W. Dartmouth Between S.W. 66th 68th Tigard. Oregon Gentlemen: As requested, I have expanded upon my original investigation to determine if any of the property falls within the category of Sensitive Lands, as defined in Mapter 18.S7, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Sensitive lands are those potentially unsuitable for development because of 1.) location within. the 100-year floodplain, 2.) within a natural drain- ageway, or 3.) on steep slopes. The property does not lie within a lowland nor adjoins a water course or body of water which has or may be covered by floodwaters, and therefore, not within any floodplain. Chapter 18.57 defines drainageways "as those areas which convey significant seasonal concentrations of water over the surface of the land." The term t -Hill, : • ., , .• r- _ inageway' is not used in the Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw �adra or other available texts. I assume the term as stated refers to both chan- % nel or sheet flooding. neither of which takes place on the property. Fimlly, steep slopes are defined as "portions of the ground surface which - +• t.A� t,r .. �'" GEOLOGY — 14VOROLQdy ,x• .! ' '.�'• -2- ''� t M have a slope of twelve percent or greater . S1 r� �, normal to the contours across the D.J.B. property, measured on the Lake Oswego 7.5 minute Geolog- ical Survey Quadrangle sheet, indicates vertical elevation difference of- 45 feet within a horizontal distance of 650 feet, which is a 7% slope. ' It is apparent that the D.J.B. Property is not within a sensitive zone as ,, defined. I will be available for further assistence on an as-needed basis. Respect ft; 1 N-, Paul W. 1lug1jes, Engineering Geologist GER'JiF/FO:, cc: Fred AndersonCREGON ' Attorney-at-Law KUL VI 5865 S.h'. Center , l - Tigard, Oregon 97223 \�.\ Q*�� G • ANG r �. N �' P. W. HUGHES 8c ASSOCIATES IMCGRPORATEO 1590 WOODLAND TERRACE LAKE OSWEGO.OREGON 97034 Telephone 503 — 636.2523 July 12,- 1983 Mrs. Geraldine Ball 11515 S.W. 91st Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Development Suitability Tax Lots 5700, 6300, 6500 $ 6600; 23-81 Tigard 1S. 1 36DD Dear Mrs. Ball: I have examined the referenced lots to determine if any of the property falls within the category of Sensitive Lands, as defined in Chapter 18.57 r, City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Sensitive lands are those potentially unsuitable for development because of 1.) location within the 100-year floodplain, 2.) within a natural drainage- way, or 3.) on steep slopes. Your property is not within the 100-year floodplain nor is it located on a steep slope (greater than 12%). The centerline of a drainageway does, how- ever pass through the northern edge of Tax Lots 6300 and 6600. I question whether this is a natural drainage. Water in the drainage is transported from properties east of Interstate S by culverts beneath I-S, S.W. 66th and 68th Avenues. It appears to be a roan-made drainage. It is my understanding that all surface runoff will be carried southward, parallel and adjacent to S.W. 68th Avenue which will serve as the approach to the south-bound on-ramp at the new Tigard Interchange. GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY -2- Upon completion of the Tigard Interchange, all surface water runoff will be channeled to the Public Right-of-way, and your property will therefore not .be within the "Sensitive -Lands" catagory. Respectfully, idi�� ToFl�o Paul W. Hughes, Engineering Geologist +E FMQMS Era PWH/ah P. W. HUGHES & ASSOCIATES YNCORPORA4`O 1590 WOODLAND TERRACE LAKE OSWEGO.OREGON 97034 Telephone 503 - 636-2523 July 12, 1983 DJB Inc. 1151S S.W. 91st Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Ground Water Levels Vicinity of D.J.B. Inc. Property Tigard -I-S Interchange Gentlemen: At your request I have examined the water well reports, on file with the State Water Resources Department in Salem, in order to determine the depth to ground water in the area surrounding your property. ( F The source of ground water is from local precipitation which infiltrates downward and laterally in a southwesterly direction. The aquifers are F located at several horizons between lava flows or within fractures which have developed within individual lava flows. The enclosed water well reports are representative of ground water depths adjacent your property. The depth to ground water varies from 49 feet to greater than 500 feet below the land surface. Ground dater beneath your property is estimated to be at depths which will not hinder any potential development. Respectfully, / Gg�iTfF/LrQ *mom d �AIjL W. HUGH£S Paul W. Hughes, Engineering Geologist v r o Pt4fi%ah ING o�Q� GEOLOGY — HYDROLOGY M WATER WELL REPORT �' State Well No .:;.... . .�...-.......�;.tont STATE OF OREGON JUS!8 1993 7 IiIATRR RESOURCES Den. State Permit Ne. ....................................... SAL .i.1. 05,-.4 (1) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL: Name eJolm and ' onir- 1 Koba_sic County Clackamas Drillees well number 7-83 Address-----MC)5 SJ Redondo SE V. IV( V.Section 6 T. 2S R 1Ew.M. acv 8ortiar.a state OR 97231 Tax Lot a Lot Bik Subdivision Address at well location: 19707 S`:Y Rod^ers Rd. (2) TYPE OF WORK(check): Fortlnnd, Ore-on New Will E ' Deepening Q Reconditioning Q Abandon Q If abandonment.describe material and procedure in Item I?- (11) WATER LEVEL,-Completed well. nd Depth at which water w"first found 132 ft (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Static level 1 [t below teed surface.Dam�- —d3 RotaryAlr O Driven O Domestic M Indintrial ❑ Municipal O Artesian pressure lbs.per square indL Data Rotary Mud 0 Due O irrigation ❑ Testwell O Other O cgmk B. O Thermal: w1didmwal ❑ Reinjection O (12) WELL LOG.- Diameter of wail below casing - .............................. ( -...CASING INSTALLED: Steel M Plastic ❑ Depth drilled 555et Depth of completed well 555 ft Threaded Q Welded FoLmation:Downbe color.texture,grain aim and structure of materials:and show 6. 10......IL Ga r this and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated,with at least one entry - Dram.fromplus..-I ft to.. Gauge a. ?0..................... for each change of formation.Report each change in position of Static Water Level ............'Diam.from...............ft to...............ft. Ga and indicate principal water-bearing strata. -� From TO INSTALLED: MATTJUAL FroTo SWL ..rr� .,.....7....'Diarm from..q''LL w......ft t...5.5 ..ft. Gauge x'18.8..................... C = - - 0 21 (6) PERFORATIONS: Pcrfo�ted?0 Yes Q No =torina 1pya-fractur3d 21 141 Tyoe of perforator used--rOZ!C-!, Clnd ---d2 Sire o[ rforetions ••��'6 in 12 in ' " 159 r 781 ........................................1..........perforations from 5:4n7......ft to...............ft clay--s - own 165 1 ...................................................perforations from...............[t to...............ft C 1 ay— _ --178 292 -c _d 242 297 ................................................ perforations from...............ft to................ft Cl - ue 297 323 (7) SCREENS: well screen installed? Q Yes =No clay-aray323 —37 Manvfaetune'sflame ................................................ ................................ C1 - i —+ 1 Type ........................................................................ Mcdel No.................. Cv— fW s 1K L Diann_ Slat Size............Set ft%=...............ft to...............ft S[ a_s e 1 Zi 43 Diam. ........................-Slot Siza............Set from...............[t to...............ft Qlay--r d 1L,431 448 (8) WELL TESTS: Dca :y "'down is amount water level is lowered Clay—granular—brown Llh? L8L1 below static level Sandstnne—ray-b-omm L51i 497 7Wax a_ pump test made? Q Yes M No If yes,by whom? _ = tr_ • l a _ -539 O 7 gslJmin.with ft drawdown after hr: n 55 114 Air test galimin.with drill stem at ft hr z. Hailertest 70 gaumin.with 226ftdrawdown aft., 1 hrs. L�rtesinn flow g_p.rri 11� p natureo[water K3 Depth artesian Worlcstarted t1-29 is 8 Completed K-? Is�33 (9) CONSTRUCTION: Special statdards: Yea m No❑ Date well drilling machine moved off of well -7 1 wellseal.--Materialtwed.��.' 4'6ts...':T°Ott................................................. D Tilling a Operatoes Certification: �i� chin tor• ' Well sealed from land surface to........................WW.8......................................ft This was co under y direct su ion.Materials used Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal............71....in. and infot on re abovw a to en knowledge and belief. Dismecer a[well bete below seal..............?.....in [Signed] ....... ... . . Date 5.A......l903... Number of tacks of cement used in well seal ...............................5a.......... sacks (Drill;ne eve ) O f 2 Drilling Machine Operator's License No. How was cement grout placed? �i.Llh'h..'ra.#!;Jed.Q�wh...�.-.�,•�CriF..�.�:L7e..... ........ .................................... .het-aaam-3 0r.—Inch-x1ole..and...E2.-inch...!maria$.................. Water Well Contractors Certification: ..................................................................................................................... This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and tltis report is true to "o instailed?..}'1Q.............. HP............ ft the best of my knowledge and belief. pump Type............ Depth............ E 'orax. �CQ rQ l.. c... TDR ILLName........ . X......��OJ:....... aadriveshoeua`d? �Ym ❑No Phugs........... Sire.location............ft (Person firmoroopoestion) (Type or print) Did any sines contain unusable water? Q Yee JCNo r JG O ' A L: 1tI7�Llki@ l OR ?7 2 Address 3 ... ...... ..A..�• .�......Y.�'r. .. ...... Tyne of".Vater? depth of strata bfethod of sealing strata off [Signed] . . .......• .. ...faler .................................... Well 1 Was well gravel pecked? Q_Year-J kL- Sire of gravel:..................... Contractor's Ucertse No.........1.....Date.................5:nk.............103. Gravel lsoed from.. ..................-ft.to........................ft NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRACTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SP'12g38-M The original and first copy of thia mpoit SALEM.OREcoN 97310 ................ STATE OF OREGON �+ APR 6 1983 Stale Permit No. ... .................................... PLEASE TYPE orWW9Z ftN OLtR`.SS I)EPT. SALEM. OR OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF LL: Name John Hedlund County Clackamas Dri!ler'swell number Address 240 S. W. Birdshill Loop SE % NW %section 6 T. 2 W R. 1 E. W.M. City Portland, Oregon 972tt9te Tax Lot 0 Lot Blk Subdivision (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): Address at well location: New Well70 Deepening❑ Reconditioning❑ Abandon❑ If abandonment.describe material and procedure in Item 12 (11) WATER LEVEL.- Completed well (3) TYPE OF WELL• (4) PROPOSER USE (check): Depth at which waterway first frond 125 re Static level 40 rt below land surface.Date 4/4/83 Rotary Air XX Driven ❑ Dometic XX In ustrw ❑ Municipal ❑ Artesian presaiue Ric,per square in,*.Date Rotary Mud O Dug ❑ Irrigation O Teat Well ❑ Other ❑ fS.Rt 0 Bored ❑ Thermal: Withdrawal ❑ Reinjection ❑ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing... 611 (5) C?.SING INSTALLED: steel ❑ Plastic xX De�tltdrillea 200 ft Depth oroompletedwell 175 ft. 171ureaded ❑ Welded XX Formation:Describe color.texture.grain size and structure tu:e of materials:and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated.with at least one entry i ......�..-Diary from=...$1......ft W........50...ft. Gauge RuOi-200... for each change of formation.Report each change in position of Static Water Level 'DiarrL from...............ft to...............ft. Gauge and indicate principal water-bearing strata. Q LINER INSTALLED: MATERIAL, From To SWI. i i ......4...-Diem.from.......5......ft.to.....!T5...ft. Gauge .PVC-200 Brown cls -occ.rock fry ents 0 6 (6) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? m Yea ❑No Gray-brown boulders & rock 6 i)pw oi perforator used Drill Gray-brown basalt fractured Size of Perforations 3/811 imy& diameter in. hard 22 r 120 perioraa«taErom.�.75......[�to..775.....ft Brown basalt dirt occ.soft 22 25 """""""""""""""""""' Black-brown basalt & lava ...................................................perforations from...............ft.to...............ft. coarse grained 25 40 ................................................... perforations from...............ttto...............ft Black basalt odd. dirtv brow SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑Yea 0 No streaks 40 80 t branufaeture sName .................................................................................... Red-brown & black basalt stre ks80 95t Typo ........................................................................ Model No...................... Gray basalt hard coarse r: Dian ........................ MOM=............Set frual...............ft.W...............ft. rained 1 w.b. Diam. ........................ Slot Size............Set from...............ft to...............ft. Red clay & cls stone 155 170 F (8) WELL TESTS: Drawdown ls amount water level is lowered Brown cls --stick 170 200 below static level n t cvmptest made? ❑Yea XXNo If vm by whom? L'JL1 ir ral./min.with 12 9 ft drawdown after 2 hm rr i. 4 Air teat AaLmin.with drill stem at ft. hes Bailer test "Urnin.with ft drawdown after hrs. -�esian flow_ R.p.m. F' 65_i_* peratn of waterLEI Depth artesian flow encountered............ft Work started 4/1/83 19 Completed 4/4/83 19 4•. (9) CONSTRUC MON: special standards: Yes❑ No 30 Date well drilling machine moved off or well 4/4/83 19 Well seal—Material used.............Qrgr:Purr...[?1 ws—rel................ (tmbonded)Water Well Constructor Certification (if applicable): Well sealed from,land surface to................rJ.•.0.................................................ft. This well was constructed under my direct supervision.Materials used r n and information reported above are true to m best knowledge and belief. Dir:meter of well[sora to bottom o[aea1..........l.Q......;n. t0 .25 r 8 �O po Y ed6'e 6 50 [Signed] Date...................19......... k: Diameter of well bore below seal.....................In Number of sacks of c n-Ant used in well seal ............................................ sacks Bonded Water Well Constructor Certification: Iiowwas camentgrout placed? pumped._ through casing..at. 0! Bond Yssuedby: Great American Insurance F= �o..ground level eaaeea.rl sarrtyCempayNaar ....................................... .. .................................................... 'Phis well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to ............................................................................................. ..................... the best of my knowledge and belief. Was pump ince!led?.......n0.............4ype............HP............Depth............ft Name A Mt N...F ELL...A.R.ILLINICz..GO...a...ING................ Was a drive sloe used? ❑Yes (NNo Plugs............Size:location............ft. RYworp—ti 1re ny autos contain unusable water? ❑Yes Yl'No Address 47.x.... u Lat< llu..Hwy..-....A.1014....oR..... 'ape of Water? depth or strata r [Signed ..: �i�[)1M...,- ............................................................... Method of sealing strata off R� i Wats.Dwell............Conatruktar 71:Fc tflt3 p,..�Ae3 ,Erb ..........19......... Was well gravel pecked? A Yea XXNo Sten of gravel:..................... � ate �t/.GJ83 Gravel placed from........................ft.to........................ft NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONSTRUCTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. SP145292.690 •'he oeisinal and fent copy of this report SALEM.OREGON Mlo are to be filed with the within 30 days from the date of well completion. - j The original and first COPY WATER WELL REPORT of this report are to betate Well No. filed with the STATE OF OREGON APR 3 19755 STATE ENGINEER. SALEMOREGON 97310 (please type or print) S j A_` E(`I G I N E}"5%te Permit No. - -------•---••••• within 30 days from the date (Do not write above this tine)„e of well completion. �•• - '"" (10) LOCATI� umber OF WELL: "130, (1) OWNER: County lett/kv�,, Driller's well n •. ' Name �✓ s '�� sa S V� li Section T �S P w w.M- Address gearing and distance from section or subdivision corn (2) TYPE OF WORD (check): Abandon ❑ Nevr Well Deepening O Reconditioning 13 (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. It abandonment.describe material and procedure In Item Ii ft (3) TYPE OF:E13 4) PR :01ndustrialSED USE (check): Depth at which water was first �btlow �land auria�. Dots — Rotary Driomestic ❑ Municipal OStatic level Cable ❑ Setlbs. per square inch. Date Dug OBorrigationest Well ❑ Other O Artesian pressure _ WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing CASING INSTALLED: Threaded❑ Welded (12) WE % Depth of completed well 1_Q 1 _ �_•Dram from —© to ft. Gage Depth drilled it to --ft• Gale Formation: Describe Color. texture. [rain size and structure of materials w Diam. from penetrated. w Diem from ft to —ft. Gage ---- and show thickness and nature of each stratum and e Ofportte each change in with at least one entry for ach chand indtCateoP� Pai bearing strata. position of Static � .PERFORATIONS: Perforated? ❑Yes No. 1�w+��*g•- mom To swr. stype of perforator used oZ in. w t? oZ Size of performtions 43 perforations from---- -- n fv �CtiZ; perforations from-- --ft. o it ,ls.a 'Soo ft to forations from _. _ ftL per - Sit yy��',L Gia l`70 !8'il () SCREENS: Well screen Installed? O Yes No Manufacturers Name s,417` e ,SdslierS l8 a Y6 TypeModel No. �.� Hlam Slat sires Set from tt to !t .-9S.D Sod yvw'Z i�,S a 7� DLsm Slot size Set from ft. to ft � /7hfw ,�Yr�O L TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is ($) NVELL lowered below static level Was a pump test made? V Yes ❑Ngo,•If Yes• by whom? 40 Yield: , [sL/min. with ft. drawdowa atter bre• _ w t w w Bailer test [al./min• with ft drawdown atter bras- Artesian flow L-P.m. ^ a© �ComPleted 73 ' 19 - �•--� ft- Work started 19 ::`S perature of wrates7o*' •Depth artesian flow encountered 19 Date well drilling machine moved off of well <7 (9) CONSTRUCTION: - Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: �i_ � Iny well seat-Material used This well was constructed raider te4 direct supervision. above are true to MY Well sealed from land surface to �o 1t Materials us and ;lief.n2tion in. best kno ed and belief. .� Diameter of Gell born to bottom of seal a i �• 19- � ........ Diameter of well bore below seal �. / (Dru1InC Mae a Operator) ._ sr Number of sacks of cement used In well seat sacksDrilling Machine Operator's License No. . sacks Number of ticks of bentonite used in well seal—•----'-- �Va:ter`Nell Contractor's Certification: Brand name of bentanite Number of Pounds of bentonite per loo gallon This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is lbs./loo gats. true t9>"best kno ledge and belief t water i, /� ova /J Was a drove Shea tiled? O Yea P1 xo Plass size: location _ tt Name .t- ...� rL<•sR iy�i' 4'»� D[3 �Y strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes No .KD�� r f�----------- Address .. ... ...�... ......_ _ .. Type of water? depth of strata ,�y ',. Method of sealing strata ofl (Signe d """ "' (water won contractor) No Size of gravel: 'tsZ gravel packed? ❑ Yes � �......—r__...__ ••---., 19../..- Was well srs P '�L' J... Date ........-•-...._............ — ft Contractor's License No. Graver placed from ft- � — NOTICE TO WATER WELL CONTRIf��ORJ A N �7 �� .+ S The original and first copy _ _ i ''WATER WELL REPORT of this report are to be State Well No.�. filed with the S .a A E E N G UQ L: M± - -A.TE ENGINEER. SALEM. OREGON-,.973.1p. �TATfe: t)! VtLGGVPI within 30 days from the date '-�• (DP-`-ZvfWlease type or print) State permit No.of well completion_ (1) OWNER- (Il) WELL TEST Drawdown is amount water vel is lowered below static level Name Was a pump test made? Yes ❑No If yes.by whom? Address , �• Yield: galdmin. with ft. drawdown after hrs. (2) LOCATI OF WELL: » » » » /j a Beller test gal./min with fk drawdown after hrs. County C S R k. /,m Driller's well number Artesian flow g•p m• Date 314 , Section T. R. W.M. Temperature of water Was a chemical analysis made?❑Yes MNo Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below cast - P /e-•� ri Depth drilled {/ it. Depth of completed well %�Qf ft. dM Formation:Describe by color.character size o/material and structure.and show thickness of aqutfiers and the kind and nature of the material is each s-Tatum penetrated.with at Least one entry for each change of formation. MATERIAL FROM TO (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): 0 d will� Deepening[3Abandon❑ Reconditioning❑ � donment. describe material and procedure La Item 12. / r 47 (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: s Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Domestic ® Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Cable Jetted U c" a •1 O' Irrigation/❑� Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Due ❑ Bored ❑ L7 � (6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded❑ Welded.% _�'DLam.from �—ft.to/Q�ft. Gage .4� �• f Diem.from_ ft W ft. Gage Dlam.from ft.to ft. Gage • d i Qr i (7) ]PERFORATIONS: Perforated?❑Yes No a O r Type of perforator used _ t. Size of perforations in. by tn. perforations from _ ft. to perforations from ft. to ft. perforations from ft. to _. _.—__— it. perforations from __ft. to —._. — ft. perforations from ft. to _ _ ft. (8) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes �z No Manufacturer`s Name —----_ --------- Model No. ---- �tri..in. Slot size Set from --__ ft- to _..—.—._—. ft. y Work started _L7777 r /--- �y19 Completed � DLam. _ Slot size Set from—_ M to ft. Date well drilling machine moved off of well �ti"—�+u 19 (9) CONSTRUCTION: (13) PUMP: Well seal—Material used in sealManufacturer1r, Na _e Depth of seal - --t��%— ft. Was packer used?-_r/Y�(j�____ Type: Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal .� - In. Water Well Contractor's Certitication: Were any loose strata cemented off?❑Yes No Depth ...... Was a drive shoe used?❑Yes P.No This well was drilled u der my jurisdiction and this report is Was well gravel packed? ❑Yes Pk No Size of gravel true to the best ! 1 ledge and be ' !. .^ -vel placed from _ft.to_ --_ ___._._ft. NAME e. -.... ....._ J - .__-•---•••--•..�_...._.. `—d any strata contain unusuable water? ❑ Yes [a No v�r erson,f or curporat n1Type 7 ' rve pryxtll /T of water? depth of strata Addr�.�� -�! -.- ----/•"-��/1J Method of sealing[strata off .... Drilling Machine Operat r`s Lic�e�lse �.�--•---..._---••--..--- (10) NATER LEVELS: �!! ' [Signed] ...'. .. ..._. _ ..... _...._............... Static level � ft.below )and surface Date ►� � q(water Well Contract* // Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch Date Contractor's License No.08 7... Trate ...-_._.. r .t ..... 19_.W-_� The onpnal and first copy of this report WATER WELL, REPORT are to be tiled with the WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. STATE OF OREGON State Well No. ..'.+�-�.-�. •••%•--_--•- •-�'n-�� SALEM. OREGON 97310 (Please type or print) State Permit No. .n days from th¢date .-....__.._.__...--...-......_..... ~•••of well completion. (Do not write above tais Uric) (1) OWNER: (10) LOCATION OF WELL: t UI r � County y pv/2 S.' Dt/ller'a well number Name 1 � Address /T 7�� NtJ ��' / 3� ��✓�tL Section W.M. •'�"��„�,Ea �� -- Bearin6 and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF WORD (check): New Well❑ Deepening:, Reconditioning Q Abandon ❑ It abandonment.describe material and procedure in Item 12. (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth ,t which water was urn :cued CR74C, .,.3CCI tt Rotary �{ Driven Q 1t below land surface. Data Domestic Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Static level Z2 J e ❑ Betted ❑ lbs. per square Inch. Date _ ❑ Hored ❑ Irrigation ❑ Ten Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure (5)_CASING INSTALLED: Threaded❑ Welded❑ (12) WELL LONG: Diameter of wen below easing b� Dlam. from _ _ _ t_t}' .- ft. Gage - _ Depth drilled ��U tG Depth of completed well -Yev 1t. Dlam. fromi� L - ft. Gage .__ - Formation: Describe color. texture, grain size and structure of materials; Dtam. from -_ _.•--- ft- to - - ft. Gage - —- and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated. with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each ehznre in ,(6) PERFORATIONS' Perforated? ❑ Yes �NO. position of static Water Level and Indicate principal water-bearing strata. 31ATERIAL To SWI• Type of perforator used Size of perforations in. by in. ' A ____... perforations from .. -- fL to .. ._ IVA • __, -•-�perforations from .— ft. to _ ft. S --�_._._.-_._ perforations from ....-.___ ft. to _..-_..- __ »-. ft. Qom (7% SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes trNo b. .ufacturees Name --•— Y Model No. :F Dian. Slot size Set from -- ft. to ft. Dian. Slot size Set from- ft. to ft 'Il -N e A r- ♦$ WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is t: —_ I ti i lowered below static level 7th_ _ a pump Oen made? �Yes ❑ No It yes• by whom?OJO�5`I`vA eYd �� Bai/min with `lE ft.: t drawdown after c,X hxT• E R R E S O U ^ SAt_ L! t 39L7{1 er test gal./min. with ft. drawdown alter hrs. • af:n flow g•P•m. {�/7 &� y AC 19 G f r 14 S G. ' Temperature of watee��aDepth artesian flow encountered .._.._ _ !t. Work started �/ Completed•� 7 - 1974 ry�t 19 i 4 r Date well drilling machine moved oft of well i "' �� (9) CONSTRUCTION: Well seal-Material used .............._... ... .. . ....................».....................--......... Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: �s,Q �yl� This well was constructed folder ms direct supervision. Well seated from land zurfacc to ..._..._................. ft. Materials and info a ' pclx above are true to my Diametee of well bore to bottom of :cal best lcil ed and belleA .. P-•� .•• Diameter of well bore below seal .... --• " �$� / ', ................................ in. [Sigh lling machine operator) o Number of sacks of cement used in well seal .................._............................ sacks (Dri,Urillin gMachine Operator's License No. ....................... ® How was cement grout plsced? ................................................._............................._...... - ........................................................................................................................................................... Vater Well Contractor's Certification. ............................................................................................................................................................ This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is .... -..._................................_..-.........................._.........................-......_......I....................._.....I. true toe-til-est o edge an bell W - drive shoe usedT Q Yes ❑ No Plugs ............ Stu Iocatton ............ ft. Name .�?);� •-�`-» '•¢ Or Did any strata cantata unusable water? ❑ Yes 89 No � rson t oavmraWill Type of water? depth of strataAddress ,. �...�t id.. ..ad of seatin strata oft ��.. ........ .......»- •- Meeh g [Signed] - f • i� (Water well ono actor) Was well gravel packed? Q Yes )°No Size of gravel: ................................ �oJw//� Gravel placed from .... it. to ............ ft. Contractor's License NO. . pate .... ..... rx•. 1>a- v lifYrlCE To WATER wELL coNTR C1oR E WELL REPORT ._ The original and first copy � 4 State Well No. �..��---•••-.•-•••- of this report are to be OF OREGON filed with the r•� a or Prints it No. ,r•n a type -•.................................. GREG N 9 10; F FA r. ( is fine) State Permit PA l E ENGINEER. SALEM. �Do pot write above this 1 within 30 days from the date of well completion. • ' "[ t `7�1ELL• LOCATION OF OWNER: Count', 1 — IIrtller's well number (1) T. 2S I:t. w.M. �Q. Audre Bake If;j NWt i Section 6 Name Ejcth Tuan n at; �' 97 2— Address 2it2 n ` 1 S� S Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TYPE OF %VORRK (check): Abandon 0 Deepening O Reconditioning❑ New Well Z7 dare to Item Si tt Dlameter of well below easin[ ••••• If abandonment, describe maters:l and prose (12) `• �5O tt. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): WELL LOG: ft. Depth Of completed well Municipal O Depth drilled 250 Rotary 0 Driven❑ Domestic Industrial ❑ Dep elute oC materials'. . Jetted ❑ Ocher O Describe color. texture, grainsize stratum and salter penetrated. Cable Irrigation ❑ Tett Nell ❑ gormation: Duni ❑ Bored ❑ and show thickness and nature o2 each Threaded O O h at le of Static Water Level as drilling proceeds. Note drilling rates. Welded�l with at{east one entry for each change o! formation. Report each chane CASING INSTALLED: 25 To swL C. �� tt Gage -....*... From LL �� n• to xA'r�tAL � Dtam. from - _.__ - n Gage .._...._... _ O Diam. from __...-.--- _ ft. Gage ......_._- Orange C! Dlam, from ............... ft. to l . .-__........_' ___. PERFORATIONS: Perforated?O Yes 1p No• Rock O .*•� hard are of perforator used v , !n. by in- Size y i Size of perforations ft. to -- ft. '�nr• orr� perforations from -------- r`--- - ft. Rnck medft. to perforations from pp -�----- _,- --- _ - ft. �uOC1C mgr n to hard• bT.s—_ 118 ``-- perforations from - Rock,, — 2 ft. to perforations from ---- ft. to ........... perforations from -- -- ------ (J) SCREENS: welt Screen instatled? O Yes NO _ .__._._... B"nufacturer•s Name _ -----•----- .--Model No. ._._...__...-__.__....__.- -_ -- Type Diam. —.-Slot size Set froth'==-`! -- ft. to --... rt Slot size ------------.- Set from ••---- (g) WATER LEVEL: Completed we11. 118 Date 9-3-69 Static level it. below land in ian pressure lbs- per square inch Date L Drawdown is amount water level is 9 (9) WELL TESTS: lowered below static level 1969 Completed S:At• 15 19 6 No If Yes,by whom? Work oved off of well .SG started Au • 19 V t. 16 19 69 Was a pump test made?O Yes ft drawdown after hrs. ttld: gal./min. with _ Date well drilling machine m Drilling 1%fachtne Operatoe'ts Certlficatton: ervisioa-my PJiate- This well was constructed u reported above lercareu4rue to my best to Irawdown after 1_ �• rials used and information rep gal./min. with knowledge d belie . Bauer test mDateaept•••.23, V . Date ............... - Artesian flow No [Signed] (Ort 11 C Maehlne Oo=calor Temperature of water q1tow's a chemical analysts made�0?t° _ O • Drilling Machine (?perator's License No. ••--•••••--39- S.......................... (10) CONSTRUCTION: Well seat—Material used ......... cR e- "-`--- - it. risdiction and this report is _ ft Nater Well COContractor's Certittcat on: —! -"' This well was drilled under my ] Depth of seat _........-..-....._.._..-......_...___...-.•---_---10-••— tit true to the best of my knowledge and belief. / :meter of well bore to bottom of Seal --•••• tb _ ................._....... B Q.�_a.................._.»»_.._...»..•-•........rint_... �` No DeD NAME 5613 ration) (Type or print) Were any loose strata cemented off? O Yes (p.rron,firm or carves Milwaukee s Or. 97222 Yea ❑N° Addres; 5112 S.E-McLoug:-11in, ......•••..._.._..." ................. Was a drive shoe used? NO Did any strata can unusable water? O Yes depth of strata .................'Q........ Type of water? [Signed . ............. ............. ... I (water Well Contrae or 69 Method of:eating :arata off l n�teSspt. 23 0Yes No Size of gravel: .............. Was well gravel packed? . The originaland first copyAtll"rdibb�a i d NATER WELL REPORT _ _ are to be filed with the ��pp r--/� WATER RESOURCES DEPARTAENT. 2197 J STATE OF OREGON State Well Na. ,.fcY� ,[... .. ,G'..jl.�..... SALEM. OREGON 97$10 (please type or print) within 50 days fr m T!i Re RESOURCES DEPT. State Permit No. _....... .....-..........___. of well completion. SALEM OREGON (Do not write above this line) (1) OWNER' (10) LOCATION OF WELL: Name !tIrs Audrey Bake County Clack8-IIIAS Draier's well number 57-69 (79) Address 2L250 S. W. 65th 4ve. Tual».tin, Ore, N:7 % N:U % Section 6 T. 2S R. IE W.M. _ Q70 2 Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (2) TI:?E OF WORK (check): New Well ❑ Deepening 52 Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ If abandonment. describe material and procedure in Item 12_ (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed Well. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Depth at which water was tint found 342 ft_ Rotary 10 Driven O Domestic $) Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Static level ,85 ft. below land :uriace. Date3/20 79 Cable ❑ Jetted ❑ Dug ❑ Bared O Irrigation O Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch. Date ( ASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ welded❑ (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing --••-_6.._».- .._. Diam- from _ _.—_._— ft to __— ft. Gage _._____— Depth drilled J;60 ft. Depth of completed well 360 fL Diam. from ...._»..—.-- ft_ to _—. __ ft- Gage ...._.._-•--•- Formation: Describe color, texture. Crain size and structure of materials: _---.__.___'Dian. from -_ _••_ ft. to __.• t< Gage -.__ __-..__ and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated. with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in {(] No. position of Static Water Level and Indicate principal water-bearing strati. ( �pERFOP.ATIONS' Perforated? El Yes Tyae of perforator used MATERIAL From To sWL Size of perforations in. by in. Basalt haxd grey 250 329 perforations from .. ft_ to ._.........»».___...-.._- ft. Basalt grey and brown 329 342 .....__ perforations from —_-•� ft. to -..._..__.___-_.__._..__ ft. 1 black and brown soft •----- 42 35'1 185 ................. perforations from ------..--�_--._. ft. to __. ft. 20 m SCREENS: well screen installed? ❑ Yes Q No B alt Grey Hard 351 3 O aanufacturer's Name —__•-- ----•_---•••------ Type .__--_.,—____ _ Model No. —.. — For the ori incl drilling to efer to our well i Dam. ____-._ Slot size _. Set from_ _ _n. to __-- -- ft. report " -6 dated Se tember 2 6 . Dam. Slot size_. Set from_ —_ft. to ft. (8) `VELE TESTS: loweredbelow statamutic level ler leve) is Was a pump test made? ❑Yes Mf No If yes. by whom? Yield: gal./min_ with ft drawdown after his. Bail&dtnt 20 gal./min. with 170 ft- drawdown after 1 hr.. Artesian flow X.P.M. _ erature of water Depth artesian flow encountered _ — ft. Work started 7/19 19 '79 Completed /�O 1979 (9) CONSTRUCTION' Date well drilling machine moved oft of well 3/20 1979 Well seal-Material used ,_•.................................... Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: This 'Nee was enoru ted under my direct supervision. Well sealed from land surface to ......................................................... -•-••••--•-••-....•••• ft. i Materials used and information reported above are true to my Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal ................................ in. best kn0 a and beh�al`f. Diameter of well bore below seal ................................ 1n. [Signed] . XkZQM. . ..... Date ......_ /26---. •19-79- aI '�IIV1�Dr)gtI1n Number o4 sacks of cement used in well sea[ ................................................ sacks Daniel v. .- dH"chtne O ator) 718 - How was cement grout placed? ........ ............................................................................ Drilling Machille Operator's License No. ............................................ ........................................................................................................................................................ .... Water Well Contractor's Certification: ............................................................................................................. ............................................. This Well Was drilled under II1y jurisdiction and this report 1s .................................................................................................................................................... true to the best of Illy knowledge and belief. -as a drive shoe used? ❑ Yes ® No Plugs ............ Size: location ........... ft. e llulan Bros. Drilling Cio. Name __-St^_____ m --_..........._......I.__.............................................................. Did any strata contain unusable water? ❑ Yes :n No (Person. firm or corporation) (Type or print) Type of water? depth of strata Address .'S� 3.._�.e_•E2eJ_ o Ciy_ A/ve._ �R3.lw.,.,-Ore. 9' 222 Method of sealing strata off (Signed) --• ��_ "J=^' '� �'•"'•- VVas well gravel packed? Yes No Size of ra•-1: (Water N•eti Contractor) ......�. _... ¢ g . ............-- Ronald F. McConnell Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Contractor's License No. ...�?2�?.... Date Rharch_2 .••_•-••_-.-•-••. 19-79 v I CITYOFT11FARD July 15, 1983 WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON t f S } fi Mrs. Geraldine Ball 11515 SW 91st Avenue t Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Transcript Request 4 Dear Mrs. Ball: Your request for a transcript of the testimony of Paul Hughes at the July 12, 1983 Planning Commission meeting has been forwarded to my desk. After numerous attempts to contact you by phone the last few days, I have decided to make the contact by letter. t Due to numerous requests being received over the last year, a new policy statement has been issued from the City Administrator's office. The Word Processing Center will now supply transcripts to citizens only upon receiving a ( written request with payment for the job in advance. I estimate that the transcription job should take approximately 2 hours and would cost $32.00, and the copying which you have requested along with the transcript would cost $11.25. If you wish Word Processing to complete this job, please send a letter of y request along with a check in the amount of $43.25. Upon completion of the transcript, which will be completed when the City's workload permits normally this can be accomplished within a week), we will call you to pick up the € work. If the job does not take the full 2 hours, the appropriate refund will be sent to you in the mail. However, if the job requires more than 2 hours, s you will need to pay the additional charges before receiving your copy of the transcript. If you would prefer to have a copy of the tape from that portion of the meeting, please furnish a blank cassette tape to this office along with a $10.00 non-refundable fee to cover duplication costs. s Should you have any questions regarding this procedure, please feel free to i contact me at 639-4171. f i Sincerely, _ Loreen Wilson, Office Manager i i lw/0333A 12755 S.W.ASH P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 TRANSCRIPT PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF MRS. G. BALL PAGE 1 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 12, 1983 - MR. PAUL W. HUGHES TESTIMONY Mr. President, members of the Commission, my name is Paul Hughes, I'm consulting geologist and hydralogist• with offices at 1590 Woodland Terrace in Lake Oswego. I am here representing two entities, one DJB Inc. and the other, Mrs. Ball who is an officer in DJB Inc. , and it concerns property up in the triangle where the new Tigard Interchange is taken place and it is a problem concerning your, uh, within your comprehensive plan/sensitive land overlay. There is a map that was constructed in 1977 by the City of Tigard showing areas of flooding and, uh, wetlands and, uh, part of this overlay does show, it uh, it infringes upon some of the property owned by DJB Inc. I made an examination of the property. There is indeed some water problem up there, but that is a failing septic tank belonging to Landmark Ford and has nothing to do with the wetland, and if that was corrected, the problem would be solved. I did go ahead and make an examination of the property. Uh, in the three, uh, there are three issues in which you cover in your sensitive lands. One of them is the 100-year floodplain. This is, obviously property is not within the floodplain. The second issue is, is it within a natural drainageway, and the trouble with that is that there is no definition of the word 'drainageway' in any standard text in hydrology, so I simply made one up for you and put it in here and if the Planning Department doesn't like it, you can turn it around or what ever you like, but I'm looking at drainageways as "those areas which convey significant seasonal concentrations of water over the surface of the land" that is the only thing that I could think of. PRESIDENT TEPEDINO: Isn' t that pretty close to what the code says? MR. HUGHES: Oh, it says Chapter 18.57, defines drainageways in this manner, the term drainageway is not used in the handbooks of applied hydrology, so I'm including, pardon me, I'm also including a section on sheet flooding which takes place seasonally. The property is free of these three problems and so stated, and I have discussed this with the Director and then have gone on in the study a little further to include other properties; one, uh, two pieces of property held separately from DJB Inc. by Mrs. Geraldine Ball, and I have covered the same topics, they are adjacent properties and therefore I believe would answer the, the problems that might be faced at this site. I've made a map of the areas that, uh, were wet during the winter months, that is the month of April, which is almost anytime this time of year, this year at Least. Also, I made a study of the water levels of all the existing wells I could find in the general area to determine the actual location of the round-water table throughout that area and have found that the round--grater_3 g $ g �+d�Y table in no place is closer than 49 feet. Uh, (a few words were mumbleat i,, this point and indistinguishable to transcriber) that 's the closest of any of the water-tables in that area. I would like to submit a series of four reports, to planning or to yourself, and the, I' ll try to answer any questions 7?X0L,f I_M �L which you might have and would be willing to come over and discuss this with the Planning Director or anybody, and go into the field concerning this property. As you know, construction is taking place there at the present time, and the waters that there is , there is a drainageway there, a man-made drainageway apparently at the time that I-5 was put in. Due to the construction, that drainageway has been some what destroyed and water is being discharged now upon the Ball property. And we have letters and have discussed this with the Highway Department and they are going to convey that water . f . TRANSCRIPT PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF MP. BALL PAGE 2 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 12, 1983 - MR. PAUL W. HUGHES TESTIMONY adjacent to the, uh, the uh, 68th, SW 68th, which will be the approach to the on-ramp south-bound. None of that water will be on any private land, or any other lands other than adjacent to.. .we believe we have handled all the questions that my, uh, that might concern the uh, the sensitive land issue on this project. PRESIDENT TEPEDINO: Thank you sir. (lw/0713A)