The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 02/23/1983 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & TURA PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate FEBRUARY 23, 1983, 7:30 P.M. sign-up sheet(s). Tf no sheet is available, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ask to be recognized by the Chair. Non-agenda LECTURE ROOM items are asked to be kept to 2 minutes or less and are heard at the discretion of the Chair. 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Cali To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Undei: Open Agenda RECESS REGULAR MEETING 2. TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY MEETING 2.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 2.2 Resolution to Not Hire Consultant and to Initiate the process for May Election on Tax Increment, Requested by Councilor Scott 2.3 Resolution to Hire Consultant and Scart Plan Amendment, Prepared at Council Direction 2.4 Adjournment RECONVENE SPECIAL MEETING 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve 72nd Avenue Contract Payment 3.2 Approve Solid Waste Resolution No. 83-18 Increasing Fees 2/1/83 3.3 Receive and File Memo From City Administrator re: OLCC Application 4. APPROVE TURA RESOLUTION: 4.1 Resolution No. 83--_ To Not Hire Consultant and Initiate Process for May Election. 4.2 Resolution No. 83- To Hire Consultant and Initiate Plan Amendment. 5. SUMMERLAKE EASEMENT DISCUSSION o Director of Planning and Development 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURLIC HEARINGS - The Mayor may impose time limits on public testimony. All persons are encouraged to submit their comments in writing before and after the meeting. 6.1 CPA 14-82 - Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies 6.2 CPA 15-82 - Comprehensive Plan Map o Public Hearing opened C Summary by Director of Planning and Development o Public Testimony o Staff Response o Public hearing Closed o Consideration/Action by Council 7. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (1)(f) to consider issues related to Pending Litigation. 9. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 TIGARDaft-W]WAMMMUM 4-0-OKM AM ago CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian, John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla, and Ima Scott; Frank Currie, Director of Public Works (Arriving at 8:50 P.M. ) ; Doris Hartig, City Recorder/Finance Director; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Director of Planning and Development ; Ed Sullivan, Legal Counsel; Patt Martin, Word Processing Specialist (arriving at 7:50 and leaving at 10:45). 2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL & AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) City Administrator requested the following items be added to the consent agenda: .1 Call special Town Hall Meeting March 14, 1983. .2 Call for executive Session March 21, 1983 for City Administator's performance review. t E Remove from consent agenda the following: 3 i Approve Solid Waste Resolution No. 83-18 Increasing Fees 2/1/83. (b) Art Biggs, 8787 S.W. Mt. View Lane, Tigard stated his intention to speak regarding TURA but not necessarily the items as listed on the agenda. Mayor Bishop indicated this item should be addressed under agenda item 2, Tigard Urban Renewal Agenda Meeting. COUNCIL RECESSED AND RECONVENED AT 7:45 AS (TURA) TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL p AGENCY. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee members Wilbur Bishop, Tom Brian, John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla, Ima Scott; Doris Hartig, Finance Director/City Recorder; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Director of Planning and Development; Ed Sullivan, Legal Counsel; Patt Martin, Word Processing Specialist (arriving 7:50 P.M.). 4. The following citizens spoke regarding TURA: Jay Greene, 10335 S.W. Greenleaf Terrace, spoke regarding tax increment financing and felt it should not take place without a vote of the people. Word Processing Specialist Arrived: 7:50 P.M. E Arther Biggs, 8787 S.W. Mt. View Lane, discussed the procedure and favored the issue going to the vote of the people. He addressed Tigard's indebtedness and tax increment financing. He requested members of audience to stand that favored submitting the issue to a vote. PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 Mawr]AMM Dave Adkinson, 10460 S.W. Century Oak Drive, discussed issue of submitting matter to voters and suggested tax increment financing be submitted to voters at this time. Pat Furrer, Chairman of TURA Committee synopsized public meetings and information in newspapers, the work done by the committee and accomplishments by other cities. He spoke to the benefits to the community through TURA and urged Council to proceed with the hiring of a consultant, initiate a plan amendment and continue tax r increment financing. F Tom Dennehy, 16421 N.E. Holladay, Portland, who lives in the Port of Portland and Metro Service District spoke to urban renewal projects thoughout the state and stated he did not want to pay for Tigard's TURA. He was critical of the consultants report and suggested i letting the voters make the decision as to tax increment financing. g Bruce Clark, 10840 S.W. Errol, spoke in favor of tax increment financing and suggested the Council's decision for tax increment £ financing should be upheld. He further commented this is an investment in the future of the City of Tigard. Cheryl A. Kuhn, 11860 S.W. 91st, Manager of Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce supported the Council's action and stated the Chamber felt it was a fair decision by Council. She noted the voters have the opportunity for submitting a referendum to the citizens. Lavalle Allen, 7540 S.W. Hermosa Way, inquired as to information �. published in paper. Mayor Bishop responded to questions. Allen requested Mayor keep promise made in state of city message. John Butler, 9760 S.W. O'Mara favored redevelopment of downtown area and suggested an advisory vote be recommended by Council. John Schwartz, 15900 S.W. 76th, requested the citizens be given a chance to vote on the issue. Mayor Bishop, showed flip chart reporting figures of various taxing districts from 1971 through 1983, explaining tax rates as they increased/decreased over the past 13 years. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 83- IN THE MATTER OF INITIATING A MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN TO PRECLUDE THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. (a) Motion by Councilor Scott to adopt; seconded by Councilor Scheckla. (b) Councilor Scheckla questioned City Administrator if he had stated in December of 1981 the people would get at least an advisory vote. City Administrator responded that to the best of his memory the motion was to have advisory vote or continue and use tax increment financing. Further discussion by Council, with Councilor Brian noting the dollar impact is so small and in his opinion Council was carrying out their responsibilities. Councilor Scott commented the real issue is, the people should have the right to vote. PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 is (c) Motion to adopt TURA Resolution 83-01 failed by 2-3 vote with Mayor Bishop, Councilors Brian and Cook voting NAY. 6 TURA RESOLUTION 83-01 IN THE MATTER OF A MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN. (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to adopt. (b) Discussion followed by Council regarding the hiring of a consultant to prepare a major plan amendment and financial analysis. (c) Resolution was approved by 3-2 majority vote of Council with Councilors Scheckla and Scott voting NAY. s TURA MEETING ADJOURNED - 8:50 P.M. Director of Public Works arrived: 8:50 P.M. CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:51 P.M. 7. APPROVE 72nd AVENUE CONTRACT PAYMENT TO COLUMBIA EXCAVATING INC. IN AMOUNT OF $19,180.94. (a) Motion to approve: Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian. e Approved by unanimous vote of Council. s ` 8. APPROVE SOLID WASTE RESOLUTION NO. 83-18 INCREASING FEES 2/1/83 (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to remove from the agenda and consider 2/27/83. i Approved by unanimous vote of Council. # r 9. RECEIVE AND FILE MEMO FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR RE: OLCC APPLICATION (a) Motion to receive and file: Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor g Brian. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10. TURA RESOLUTIONS: (a) RESOLUTION NO. 83- IN THE MATTER OF INITIATING A MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN TO PRECLUDE THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. (b) Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt. Motion failed by 2-3 vote of Council with Mayor Bishop, Councilors Brian and Cook voting NAY. PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 ES (c) RESOLUTION NO. 83-19 IN THE MATTER OF A MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN. (d) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. Approved by 3-2 vote of Council with Councilors Scheckla and Scott voting NAY. 11. SUMMERLAKE EASEMENT DISCUSSION (a) Planning Director further explained his memo and recommended the developer initiate the proceedings. (b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to deny the i request. a Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. RECESS 9:05 P.M. MEETING RECONVENED 9:22 P.M. 12. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARINGS CPA 14-82 - FINDINGS, POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES f (a) Jeremy Coursolle reviewed the document "Findings, Policies & Implementation Strategies." (b) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED t o John Butler, NPO X61, 9760 S.W. O'Mara, reported he had problem with l.l.l.h. of (page 7) and stated it was his understanding it should be 20 units per acre. o Director of Planning & Development clarified the issue regarding density issue and requested to go over his notes and report back a next meeting. o Geraldine Ball, representing DJB Inc. and herself, 11515 S.W. 91st Avenue submitted documents showing drainage way across S.W. 66th. { s o Deborah Naubert, 14365 S.W. 80th Place, NFO #5, questioned when the floodplain issue will be discussed. Staff reported this item will be heard March 2, 1983. o John Gibbon, Attorney, representing housing developers addressed concerns regarding housing implementation and density issues. He suggested changes in various areas on the map and stated he would submit a detail of his suggestions to planning staff. o Gary Reid, 12700 S.W. 72nd, addressed the density issues and suggested broadening the segment to allow the typical middle class home to be built in Tigard. PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 F. o Bob Bledsoe, 11800 S.W. Walnut, representing NPO #3, also spoke to the density issues and noted recommended changes in the plan. o Attorney Sullivan suggested Council look at wordage changes and staff will bring back next week. Legal Counsel noted pages 3,8,and 13 have to have maps attached to plan when adopted and Planning Staff should check carefully and resolve issue on page 14, 3.3. "There are no known mineral or aggregate resources within the Tigard Planning Ares." o Other changes as noted by Attorney are: Page 19, 3.6.1. (a) Add: "Facilities within a park will be adjusted to meet the needs and desires of the Park System Development Charge district residents and the characteristics of the site. Park and/or recreational facilities in greatest demand and least supply should receive the highest development priorities." Page 31, 6.1. 5th "Finding" eliminate: "The rapidly changing housing market will require the City to periodically [to] reevaluate its housing and land use objectives to provide for a variety of housing types and densities to meet the needs of future residents." Page 67 10.3.1. Add: "The City shall consider annexation requests outside the Tigard Urban Planning Area and within the Urban Growth Boundary consistent with Policies 10.1. and 10.2 and amendment of the agreement between the City and the County." Page 68, 11.1. correct: "The Redevelopment of downtown [should] shall be accomplished in order to make it complementary to newer shopping areas. Convenience, appearance and the needs of the shopping public should be primary considerati.,ng," Page 68, 11.2.1. correct: "Ash Avenue [should] shall be extended across Fanno Creek, enabling access to the neighborhoods commercial area without using Pacific Highway. Design Features shall be used to slow traffic and make the street as safe as possible. Ash Avenue shall be designated a minor collector in conformance with the (comprehensive) master strear plan. Design features and mitigation measures shall hold traffic lumes to the middle limits of a minor collector." Page 71, 11.3.1. Implementation Strategies (3) should be changed into policy and out into transportation plan. ["The City of Tigard shall work with other governmental bodies for the development of an arterial route connection from Murray Boulevard or Scholls Ferry Road to Pacific Highway. This arterial route should be located west of Bull Mountain, and should not utilize roads which pass through existing residential areas within Tigard."] Page 73, 12.1.1. (b) Add: "The applicable locational criteria." Page 79, B (2)(a)(1) omit: ["Be located at a dangerous intersection or create a dangerous intersection."] PAGE 5 — COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 23, 1983 Page 78, (2)(a)k(i) omit: ["Be located at a dangerous intersection or create a dangerous intersection."] Page 80, B,2, (a)(i) omit: ["Be located at a dangerous intersection or create a dangerous intersection."] Page 15, 3.4.1.c "Areas valued for their fragile character as habitats for plants, animal or aquated life, or having endangered plant or animal species, or specific natural features, valued for the need to protect natural areas." l (c) Consensus of Council was to continue considerations and Mayor Bishop announced public hearing will be continued to Wednesday, March 2, 1983, 7:30 P.M. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (d) Attorney suggested other changes in text as follows: Page 2,3, "Provide a process by which the city may expand the Urban Planning Area Boundary when the City, County and affected property owners find that such an extension is necessary.07 Page 8,2. "The Community Development Code (C.D.C. ) shall provide quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map which may be initiated by affected parties on a semi-annual basis and approved if the City Council finds: " {, (e) Staff and Council discussed policy that would require single family homes to have garages. Discussion centered on type of housing to be included. (f) Motion by Councilor Scott that for all dwellings there be at least one enclosed parking space for each dwelling. Motion seconded by Councilor Brian. After further discussion Scott and Brian withdraw motion. Staff to check further into the issue and bring back some suggestions. (g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian the corrections and typo's as outlined by Legal Counsel be made and drafted into the document. Motion passed by 4-1 majority vote with Councilor Scheckla voting NAY. Word Processing Specialist left: 10:45 P.M. 13. OPEN AGENDA (a) Councilor Cook notified Council that he had a new job that will cause some travel and he may be gone on some Monday nights without advance notice to Council. COUNCILOR SCHECKLA LEFT 11:00 P.M. PAGE 6 -- COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 14. MEETING RECESSED AT 11:04 and COUNCIL WENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION UNDER ORS 193.660 (1)(f) to consider issues relating to pending litigation. Council reconvened at 11:21 in Special Session. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 83-20 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND PURPOSE FOR ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE 72ND AVENUE AREA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, DIRECTING AN ATTEMPT TO AGREE WITH THE OWNERS AS TO COMPENSATION THEREFOR, AND AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to adopt. Approve by unanimous vote of Council present. 16. MEETING ADJOURNED 11:20 P.M. i City Recorder ATTEST: t i k r i Mayor 1 i (0398A) PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 23, 1983 i 11 Bill!III 111 1 E. t'' {� TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TURA RESOLUTION NO. 83 - 1_ / IN THE MATTER OF INITIATING A MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN TO PRECLUDE THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. WHEREAS, the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency agrees that the issue of the use of tax increment financing in the Downtown Tigard Revitalization Urban Renewal Area should be referred to the votes for a binding vote ; and WHEREAS, such a change in the Downtown Tigard Revitalization Plan would require a major plan amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency that: Section 1: City Staff is asked to prepare a major plan amendment precluding the use of tax increment financing in the Downtown Tigard Revitalization Urban Renewal Area; Section 2: The amendment process be initiated, including: 1. City to prepare documents: A. A report which addresses the commitment made to refer tax increment to the voters, and the implications that such a change in the Urban Renewal Plan would have for the goals and timetable of the Plan. Specifically, the report should address changes from the original report, including: (1) "source of monies to pay such costs (projects)" ORS 457.085(3)(d). (2) Any effect on anticipated completion date- ORS 457.085 (3) (e). (3) Use of tax increment. ORS 457.085 (3) M. (4) Effect on feasibility of the plan. ORS 457.085 (3) (g). B. Proposed amendment to the plan if the use of tax increment is rejected by the voters. (1) Agency review of amendment and report and refers to Downtown Tigard Committee. Refer to Planning Commission for information. March 7 (2) Place ad for Planning Commission Hearing, submitted March 8, to be published. March 10 F s {� (3) Downtown Tigard Committee review; may hold hearing; returns w/recommendation to TURA. Before March 14 (4) Agency adopts amendment and report and refers to Planning Commission for a recommendation to the Council. March 14 (S) Planning Commission holds hearing and sends recommendation to Council. March 22 (6) Ordinance which incorporates plan change by reference with effectiveness dependent on voter approval adopted by Council. Resolution referring the ordinance to the voters. (7) The proposed amendment, the acommpanying report , the recommendations of the Tigard Downtown Committee, recommendations of the Planning Commission and the ordinance adopting the proposed amendments by reference and the resolution referring the ordinance to the voters goes to Council. (8) Council notice. Submit 16th to be published. March 18 (9) Council hearing. March 28 - (10) Council action to refer to voters. April 4 (11) Recorder must file certified statement including ballot title and measure number. April 12 (12) Election. May 17 sect;-- 3, The Tigard City Council be asked to refer the ordinance which would adopt the plan amendment to the voters for the May 17th election. Section 4. No consultant will be hired to prepare a financial analysis of tax increment prior to the canvas of the votes of the election on this issue. PASSED: This day of 1983. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 83 - February 23 , 1983 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council i FROM: Frank A. Currie, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: January progress payment - 72nd Avenue L. I.D. Attached is progress pay estimate number 8 for the construction of S.W. 72nd Avenue LID # 21. The payment is $19,180.94 to Columbia Excavating, Inc. I recommend council approval of payment. i { i v x DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS SUITE 445—AGC CENTER WILSONVILLE, OREGON 47070 9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE (503) 682-2450 s February 14, 1983 RECEIVED R FEB 14 11983 QTY OF TIGARD Frank A. Currie, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Tigard s P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Frank: E r Attached herewith is Estimate No. 8 for work completed during the month of January, 1983 for improvements on City of Tigard LID 21 - S.W. 72nd Avenue Street Improvements. r Although the check should be sent to our office, it should be I payable to Columbia Excavating, Inc. Sincerely, I MARLIN J,' DE HAAS, P.E. x MJD/sl c Attachment f A t cc: 80. 194.118 9. I f R I r,: eo �- PURCHASE/ CHECK REG&UeE T VENDOR Columbia -Excavating, Inc ADDRESS c/o De Haas Associates ? Suite 445-AGC Center i CI9�®® �� TW 9450 SW Cmmercp Circle Wilsonville, OR 97070 DATE 2-16-83 REQUESTED BY FAC UNIT/DEPT. Public Works PURCHASE REQUEST CHECK REQUEST PREPARE PURCHASE ORDER F-XxJ CHECK TO BE MAI_T,ED WITH ATTACHMENTS C� SEND CONFIRMING P.O. NOTIFY REQUESTER WHEN CHECK IS READ1 ,>e�PECIAL ,INSTRJ�C'TiIONS --01�ti. CHECK NEEDED BY 2-25-83 i i i ACCOUNT NUMBER QUANT?TY INVOICE NO. & DESCRIPTION 5—Z-100 r- _ TOTAL PRICE AL1 — d Progre55 Pa n f r January, 1 i i TOTAL REQUESTED19,1$().94 APPROPRIATION BAI.•ANCE $ / Amount / Initials APPROVALS: SECTION MANAGER (Less than $100) 01 DEPARTMENT HEAD CITY ADMINISTRATO S APPROVAL --------------- - ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY -------------- P.O. ---------------- P. Paid -- Signatures Checked N No. Check Number i Fin. Director Date Paid M�eet�n �a�e: oz-23-g� Any& 3 ---- - w- s Sill�l¢islllslsls(slvilla!p��IP�+i�jeia�elljsl1111111 iil�f ilt-p1rpi �iis iiipigIsiI.,iI 1 Valli) IIgr 9 s)+III le s(s !Ja sil s'�ill sis s!s s e 1 1 s s s a s ail sine r s s ssl e i 1 syiC — � P e 1 i 1 . 1 1 i i � tl NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED ._.__�._._._. .I .. Z 3 4 -- _ 5 E 7 8 3 �O DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL _. ote sz ez cz�z sz az ez zz iz oz st se �[Ii�- si si �a za zi ei of 6 ® t' -9 s o E z e f kN11N111NIi1111111Ni11111tNtIlelN�lila ll � id i 'li aaal li11F1l1lHaliil Nt9liilNEltlitllrli7l>�Ilrutl 1-1 ej....I lea tIN �I,. .alll�illl ! 1 lu Itlm3 I�a111 Illilaa MIuuhm 'a N'Am RCti 1 7 4' v i'. , CITY OF TIGARD LID 21--S.W. 72nd Avenue WORK PROPOSED WORK COMPLETED SHEET 'OF SHEETS Area Street Improvements PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY I UNIT TOTAL TOTAL I TOTAL TOTALTOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRICE DOLLARS " UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS REMARKS SCHEDULE 1 GRADING & PAVING IMPR VEM IT 1. SITE PREPARATIGN 1.1 ri;nq& Grubbing L.S. All 5n.900 70% $ 35 140.00 -�- -- 70% 35 140.00 1.2 Common Excavation C.Y. 12,981_ 6.3 7685 48 569.20 4 1.4 Embankment ,6 48 5 C.Y. __18 087_! _ 10 270 5 --- i --- 1.5 Aeration of Sub rade Hrs. 90 --- _-_ 2. BASE & LEVELING COURSE I 2.1 0" Crushed Rock C.Y__._ 12,011 _ --- I - 2.2 3/4" - 0" Crushed C.Y. Rock - 1 (Alternate Bid in Lieu of Items i. 2.1 & 2.2) 1"-0" Crushed Rock C.Y. ' .18 222q J549 697 82 2.3 036.62 158 . 1 3366 ISubgrade Stabilization _ 100 7.50 75 1,505 11,287.50 '-- --- 3. A.C. PAVEMENT Tons 1511 297 sn 4. 1 CURBS -----------2$ 83_459- 2 350 i 67 750.50 460 i! 1 4.7 Standard Concrete Curb Ems-L-23-.7812 j --- 8,904 4.2 �Standard Concrete Curb (Match 23.5g5.60 1 Existing Pavement) L.F. T 401_�; 3.00 14 20 339 5. CATCH BASINS (GB-1) --- 339 017.00 Each 66 316.24 20 871.84 26 1 8,222.24 --- 26 8 222.24 6. CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS S.F. --�- 9 710710 � 1.60 15.536.0 3,995 6,392.00 �21331_11 4 205 6 728.00 7. RELOCATE FENCE L.F. I 840 440 3 696.00 265 1,166.00 8. MANHOLE-RECONSTRUCT 265 1.166.00 Each �_ 21 500.00 10 500.005 --- i 9. MANHOLE ADJUST Son On Each I 18 150.00 2 7 ___ 3 450.00 --- roiEjEp►!!!1111 BltlElE ilE 6(EpEli EiEE[Eil Ellilll 7(E�7 1 i l i T 0 9 E 17 1 8 E ! - ----- - -- ------- - { 1 I I I �' �njm 1 1 C ET 1 1 i I ( IhIEiEt [ 31EEEEEEr� eEEEEIEEEEE - -- _ _� its 4r;n nn NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -- __. .I 2 3 4 _. _ 5 6- _ 7 9 i0 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. .o£ sZ- BIZ LZ- 8Z S? tZ., u �a 6181 lt�I�E1t iallos9fillti{Jtl1ti11#ti�►ut Z'.- ._.+.i .._..-CS6 _6` 8 [ ---9MARL"M ,nnuNIEENINuinN NEEtxEE n:e6uEtln�ti)IlE ltsl ! t 1111lIII�ua 1 0 i9 y:. CITY OF TIGARD LID 21-- S.W. 72nd Avenue WORK PROPOSED WORK COMPLETED SHEET? �SH 'OEETS Area Street Improvements PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEMDESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS 10. TRAFFIC CONTROL PAVEMENT MARKINGS 10.1 The word "STOP" (Thermoplastic) Each 17 S 127.50 --- --- "' --- --- --- 10.2 Arrows for Left Turn (Thermoplastic) a g --- --- --_ ___ ___ --- 10.3 Arrows for Two-wayLeft Turn Thermoplastic) Each _1-�_ _-- _-- _-- _-- _-- _-- 10.4 "R X R" Le end for RR X'in s. (Thermoplastic) ins o- Li_ (The=-Dlastic) r 10.6 lr 2_Line Thermoplastic) F. 1,400 --- j --- --- --- --- --- - --- -1- 10.7 1 Yellow Raised Reflect r ! 1-800 —3.10 I --- --- --- --- --- 1 __ 10.8 Yellow Raised Nonreflective Markers h 1 --- --- --- ___ 11. TRAFFIC C NTR 9rilann nn 35% $ 7,140.00 1% 204.00 36% 7,344.00 12. GATE ADJUSTMENT B49+57 L_S_. All — 1 - 13. REINFORCED CONCRETE 4 + -Y- __2� 4,BOO no 14. ( 48" CHA- a --- --- --- --- --- --- 15. A.C. PATCHING S.Y. 60 17 3 "-" -'" --- --- --- 16. REMOVE EXISTING A.C. S.Y. 1`g3p 0.60 1,098.00 1350 810.00 --' --- 1350 8 10.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE I — SCHEDULE II STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1. TRENCH EXCAVATION & BACKFILL t 1.1 Clearin & Grubbing L:S. A780% 8,000.00 --- --- 80% 8,000.00 �ill'111011+(ai+Illaltalalota(,Ia�ala�all,Ila��ll�tllgllajlTl(t1TMT1TIrp(1lip lapliM911'I'1_'�°laltl°('I�ria�°11(tl[�aslalljllllal°(°4�!°la�°!°lala(�lal,!'►a9af+ta(°ialala�aialala(3'P1�11I NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMEDi�-.__ __�. ._..1 2 .� 4 _ �J S T DtUWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN � THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. -_ ----'--- _ OE 62 ®Z LZ 9Z SZ trZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 61 81 11 JI Sf ba E! Z! 11 OI 6 8 L 9 S tr E Z .adunl,aH(ana6u,(„ulartilue>(snzaeslt{ , ' ° IR.H�' %a. MUIR Cnrw - ' t, 4 ` ..,.'amu---'-'�>--e...�,� __._.____-_-�..-___-__•_. .._. CITY'OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Avenue WORK COMPLETED SHEET 3 OF_7 SHEETS Area Street Improvements WORK PROPOSED � PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL (TEPA DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS 1.2 Trench Excavation a 0-6 Feet Dee 5872 9,101.60 170 263.50 6042 9,365.10 b 6-8 Feet D 1671 2 924.25 --- 1671 2,924.25 c 8-10 Feet 971 1,990.55 --- 971 1,990.55 _ J) 10-12 Feet Dee F 615 666 1,665.00 --- i.665 on 12-14 FQ 292 963.60 --- 292 963.60 JA -1 I 196 823.20 --- 196 823.20 16-11�r 263 I 1,643.75 --- 263 I 1 fi43.75 _Th)S�4ClL8A5.in Laterals F-__ --1-,535 1226 1,532.50 3341.25 1259 11,573.75Trench Backfill --- -� -----------I a Gra D' << - I - 11,157 I 30,681.75 203 558.25 11,360 31,240.00 _ 11 0-6 Feet Deep 524 1925 4,620.00 25 60.00 1950 I 4,680.00 _ 9nA 235 669.75 --- --- 235 669-75 - 305 945.50 --- --- 305 945.50 F. 73.95 254 1,042.80 --- --- 264 1,042.80 _ 5 72-74 Feet DeepL.F. 165 1 4.95 816.75 149 737.55 --- --- 14q 717 6 14-16 Feet Dee —t 7.10 937-20 17 830 70 --- i 7 16-18 Feet Dee L.F. 185 9.45 1,748.25 -- --- c Class 4 Back Fill 1,49.1 in 1 0-6 Feet Deep L.F. _42Q8 _ 7.50 37 560.00 3947 29,602.50 145 1,087.50 4092 30,690.00 2 6=8 Feet Deep L.F. 2.070 8.90 la,423.00 1436 12 780.40 --- --- 3 - 666 9,157.50 --- 666 -157 so 402 6,733.50 --' --- 402 4 6,733.50 KPa71.7liilrr1rr17ri1l1111i11a ] i ( l 1i n — � __ _ .� 19 � 1 ! ! � 1 J 1 � (..{ 1 i { ' 1 j ! 0 {J.. T1f►T m{tT] I- I f It to i�tl1 ii]]t 1 J!]II '1 11i!$i [�i-il! Ili a�i i�7 '7{) ill 111 r�r alr ial [(] 9!1 iil i1! rlr r{1 llLii �r - -_. .."--------»'..•.�."�n-..___-.---.. y - _...._...-.� NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED - — _I 2 3 4 _ 5S_ 7 8 9 O i 1 12'� DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN - THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO TEE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. .— --- 0}£ 6Z 8Z LZ 9Z SZ bZ £Z ZZ !Z OZ 1 £i ZI it 00 6 9 1� 9 aHlIiIII�i1lNilli�i111lrwltuo alma alaljk" __ _ p iiiilt±�;i:!;,•1�iittd•x 1a_ ee.' ; p, b a�,.,{��„s9tLliEyi nti;i;4liHiliiital l��dIIINn6wnDO"el UwUll TT - MA.Lrcr&Cn a CITY OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. WORK COMPLETED SHEET G �F 7 SHEETS Area Street Improvements WORK PROPOSER PREVIOUS I THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS REMARKS R Backfill co ' 't. 283 2,830.0 12-14 Feet Deep143 $ 3,067.35 --- --- 43 0 14-16 Feet De _ __ 67.35 atch Basin Laterals F _1�53b� 1841226 6 988.20 33 88.10 1 -1a4 4,992 Q dati n Stabilization 283 2,830.00 --- --- . P v 20 6'.111 60 1332 8,258.40 125 775.00 1457 9 ^" 33,40 Concrete Pipe (C-7_4 Cla«7� L X30 821 3,448.20 83 348.60 904 3,796.80 Conrr PPiDP(�14 n nn24.0n .000-00 33 165.0n 16� nn - r _F=r 604 ; R �, -4�. _ ete_ Pioa (f-14 fl -- --- I 1825 15.512-50 87 7-3g sn 1912 1A,2S2 no 2.5 21-inch Concrete Pipe (r-14 Cla 5 1707 19 801.20 --- 1707 19,801.20 i --- P ( 74Cav; 11 4 1866 25 097.702 --- --- 1866l 25,097.70 4 86 1 8.237.70 --- --- 86 8 237.70 M-t. - Class 3 L.F. 583 20.20 11 776.60 583 11 776.60 --- --- oncrete Pie C-76 Class 3 L.F. 472 ! 26.00 12 272.00 776 60 -: --- --- 464 12,064.00 ncrete Pi a C-76 Class 3 L.F. 288 31.55 9 086.40 281 I 8,865.55 --- --- C. -- 65.55 ees 10" Each 1 76.00 76.00 1 76.00 --- --- 1 76.00 b) 12" X 12" Each 2 80.00 160.00 2 160.00 --- --- 2 60.00 c 15" X 1D" L ch 1 130.00 130.00 2 260.00 --- --- 2 260.00d 75" X 12" ch 1 150.00 150.00 1 150.00 --- --- 1 150.00 LEe 1 152.00 --- :^01! 111 I I P i l l t 1 P I l l l l l t d l I 1 i l I.1 7 ifill !j T( 17T+1 I>1djt1�(Ild�tlltitT�ll 1{s 1{Ilr;i 1{T�iTa 1{a11{[ ;Ilt{t gtft{a 1{i slr :{P tit tll t{P Ilt tpt t{t IaP 111 Isis MOTE: IF THIS NICROFILNED I' -- "--.._ I 2 +� 4 .--_ _ 5 6_ 7 8 43 o i i 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN ___. . .. iNIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE Ta THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. - '- 06 sz ez �z gz sz oz Cz zz Iz oz Of 11 of S s _�_.__ s ._.� rtlltauhul�tlN6al�tndlar�lanitm ltllllpgt�l 1 lttlllv:s4tatlrt+Itu 1p 1�1_fp!{ aijuidt t CITY OF Street LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. Area Stet Improvements WORK PROPOSED WORK COMPLETED SHEET SOF 7 SHEETS PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ' TOTAL REMARKS k PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS 2.11 (con't.) p 18" X 12" Each 1 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 --- -- 1 170-00 - 21" X 10" Each 1 190.00 190.00 --_ ___ h 21" X 12" Each 3 200.00 600.00 2 400.00 --- -- 2 400 Q0 - i) 24" X l0" Each _5 ' 215.00 1,075.00 y29 ___ ___ .i 24" X 15" _ Each 1 290.00 1.290 on 290.00 --- ! --- k 27" X 10" 29n nn Each 1 275.00 275.00 --- 1 30'_X 10" 27r, 00 Each 1 320.00 320.00 1 320.00 m 36" X 10" 32n on Each _1 F_400.00 400.00 1. MOM --- --- .12 96-inch CM 2P Complete - _ - 'a) 14 ua eL.F. 65 22 875.00 --- --- i b 76 ua e F 175 9,975.00 --- 175 7 5-00 2.13 RCMP Tees a 96" X 18" I Fach 2 400.00 --- --- 2 400.00 b 96" X 24" Fach _ 300.on inn nn 1 300.00 '-- --- 1 300-on k 96" X 36" 2__1 800.00 --- --- Sno no 2.14 !96" X 90" CtdP Redux _� ! -_- _-- I 2.15 96-inch CMP Bends i,nnn ___ I Ono-nn 3. MANHOLE C N5TRUCTION .11 3.7 Flatto 48-inch ManholFarh __j7 19 15,200.00 1 800.00 20 16,000.00 3.2 Sad - - 900 00 24,100 on 21.5 19 350.00 --- --- 3 74 6.6 60.00 --- --- 3.4 Manh 74 r,_66o.op -Each 00 1 000.00 --- --- I 1-non on ;+yrltl►�t'rlalr r{alrit tit�tlt tit Iia ria Iia tit alI Y a t I t Y t Tj t a r T`ata=r 1 x ---------,--`v-_._. ____- _. ,_, �_�;�F, __=,��_' i I J j I I I I 9 11'1'T jR°fm) LLI t 1 Ft>� I I_I.1 9 1 J i��t�aialiiiJlirltlaf aitla{tJr(�ltTtJtatlntltirltlr�tia{tieJtialtttl,ItlrielNtltat - ., NOTE. IF THIS MICROFILMED - - - -" L... 2 3 4 -- 5 6 7 6 9 IO 11 a2 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. oC 6a ea LZ az Sa t>a ca az fz oz sr ei- ti --91 S lk eI i�- _.ii o s ® _ s_.__ S .nlJualwNltuduNluuirNtlatet9ua+�Itilaiii,6a9ui altaaanJaaaaaaatltna�an a�til�� t talattalstt s a1lt�il�llt�fint. a - - - - - - � .. ---- _ CITY OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. 6 WORK PROPOSE® WORK COMPLETED SHEET-Lw-L SHEETS Area Street Improvements PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL I TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS 4. DITCH INLET Each 2 480.00 960.00 --- --- --- --- 5. CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE Each 2 500.00 1 000.00 --- --- 6. RAILROAD UNDERCROSSING (Sheet 15) L.S. All 21 000.00 All 2 "- --- ;nn on n ll 21,00ri-on 7. CONNECT EXISTING DRAINS, Complete Each 9 400.00 3 600.00 --- Co'' -- I --- 27 8. PECIAL RIP RAP C.Y. — 65 I 25.00 1 625.00 --- I --- 6 700.00 OTAL SCHEDULE II 1 394.715.30 I I I , — a , CrHFOiIIF ---- - --- ----- -- i �De�ductible Alternate -r -- 1. (TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION COMPLETE 1.1 'S.W. UDDer Boones Ferry Road & S.W. Durham Road L.S. All 73 654.00 --- --- --- 1.2 S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. U er Boones Ferry Road L.S. All --- --- --- --- --.-_ 57 981.00 --- --- 1.3 W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Upper F 9 1L_ 45 983.00 --- --- --- - �faelig► 1lf ll1 1I1 11f oat !p9 11i !11 iIE ill 11f Evil T 1 3 __.._.- ..�_ — i I 0. .{ . ! ��'(m1111 P1 r �Tj�7�!I+i11'jEi1111!��I>7�11�111111r[�e161s1�E11{111+fE31aiIi11:{li1'+IF{E{a�1'eie]s11�11Ei111J1g1{E1r�ry11&11 NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED I'_.— _._.{_ Z 3 4 -- _ 5 6 7 8 9 0 1! 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN — THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL - - - -- f - - __- :. 971 DRAWING. 0FF£ 6Z 'Z,., LZ 9Z S6 91'Z a 42 EZ ZZ fZ OZ 61 8i EI 91 SI bl EI ZI 1I- 01 -_�-- 8 .- L--_ g 5 6 _ E Z - dlllfl011n1�i11iI1f1111N1fiY�1lE1{1tlt�f9111y1{�{ 1 ' 6 x f m"A Ru"I I { I CITY OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. WORK COMPLETED SHEET 7 DF_7 SHEETS Area Street Anprovements WORK PROPOSED PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION r UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS ,+• UIN1TS 1 DOLLARS t 2.1 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road & S.W. Durham Road L.S. All ",459.00 --- 2.2 S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Upper _— Boones Ferry Road L.S. --All— 5,552.00 --- 2.3 S.W. 72nd Avenue & S_W. Upper _ Boones Ferry Road L.S. All 6 471.00 "' --- --- --- --- --- ! Materials on Hand (Signals Equip.) _ 6,267.00 '___�—_- — 6 267.00 --- - -- —t— ----. - --' —— --— — Change Order No-1 Signal Revisions 215.00 --- "- --- --- --- --- Change Order No. 2 ___ ___ W-15,000.13 t 3 3 } � I j TOTAL SCHEDULES I, IY and IV $1,550,577.8 $707,912.59 $20,190.46 $728,103.05 PREVIOUS PAYMENTS TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED 72g 103.05 EST. NO. AMOUNT ESTIMATE NO. 8 PAYMENT PERIOD January. 1983 CONTRACTOR LESS RETAINAGE 5 % 36 405.15 1 86 492.18 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT DATE Columbia Excavating LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENT 672 P.O. Box 278 5 6.96 2 120,914.91 Tualatin, Or. 97062 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE 19,180.9 3 53,665.31 4 155 030.07 -_ PAYMENT DISTRIBUTION 5 107 129.07 ®eHAAS&ASSOCIATES,INC. Vr e•t DESCRIPTION AMOUNT' A 3Q 143-82 CONSULTING ENGINEERS &SURVEYORS PAYMENT Surae 445-AGC C—ee. 7 11A 941 60 ESTIComMATE merce C�.ere qe, 576.695 =0 —^ - q11 ep►4elr IlrlrlW rlllllr rlr roe ole ol1 ill 1.11 1, T I 1 1 t i i a Imp 1 r Itis r ._1 _ ��m� l PI � } JiT� ! i )-� ! I ! � lTI�1�°!°I°l}(T1°1°, 'J1111+1+(Ifl}11+111+Irlrl+io}r►1 NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -._ .1. Z 3 4 -- - 5 6_ - 7 l'Q DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN ' THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - TrlE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. _ __ __ _ _ - CIE—6Z--82 LZ 8Z sZ — 42 6Z 22 IIZ OZ st e..81 , LI8 L 8 S >' _e Z a1U11111111!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINrl�ertr�llf111111# _ Isre 'I�tu IIiI�lTN3TT�-�HSU) __ USiWW .i 19 9 0e February 18, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator SUBJECT: OLCC PERMIT - PLAID PANTRY Last Monday, Council voted to approve a license for the Plaid Pantry located at the Summerfield Shopping Complex. Staff varified the location, amended the address on the application form, which was listed in error, and sent the application to OLCC per Council's motion. BJ:lw CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLU11ON NO. 83 IN THE MATTER OF INITIATING A MAJOR PLAN AMENDMEN TO THE DOWNTOWN TIGARD REVITALIZATION PLAN TO PRECLUDE THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. WHEREAS, the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency recommended that a binding vote be held on whether to repeal the tax increment financing portion of the Downtown Tigard Revitalization Plan; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council also favors holding such a binding election; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD THAT: Section 1: The Tigard City Council instruct the Planning Department of the City of Tigard to commence the process whereby tax increment financing is no longer utilized as an element of the Downtwon Tigard Revitalization Program of the City of Tigard and to take all necessary steps to initiate public hearings, receive comments from advisory groups, and bring this matter before the Council for its consideration and referral to the voters at the earliest feasible opportunity. Section 2: No consul ant will be hired to prepare a financial analysis of tax increment prior to the canvass of the votes of the election on this issue. r PASSED: This day of , 1983. Mayor ATTEST: City Recorder RESOLUTION NO. 83 — r" `y/C31 February 11, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council , ,, FROM: William A. Monahan, Director vtl'x Department of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Summer Lake Utility Easement Attached you will find a copy of information provided by Arthur Lutz on behalf of SE—LU Properties asking the City Council to initiate vacation proceedings i of dedicated utility easements on undeveloped property in Summer Lake. Such a process is allowed under ORS 271.130, however, Council has in the past. required that the property owner take the lead in initiating easement vacations. Staff Recommendation: Although the opportunity to initiate vacation proceedings is available to you, staff recommends that the City Council deny this request and maintain existing policy. pm (0051P) Interiand Investment Corporation January 4, 1983 ( ) City Couacil City of Tigard 12755 S. W. Ash Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Councilpersons: Request is hereby made that the City Council initiate vacation proceedings under the provisions of O.R.S. 271 .130 as to the following dedicated utility easements contained on the Plat of AMART SUMMERL KE, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon: The ten foot utili-y easement along the real lot lines of Lots i through "2, and The five foot utility easements along the side lot lines of Lots 2 through 9, Lot 11, and Lots 14 through 22. Filed with your staff are letters from all public utility companies involved, evidencing that no use has been nor will be made of slach easement area. Each of the proposed structures to be placed on :each lots will be fully serviced from the front lot line easement area. No other property is or will be affected by reason of such proposed vacation. s Se-lu Properties, the owner of all of the lots involved, and its builder, Trademark Homes, Inc. , propose to site structures on the lots in such a manner as to most effectively utilize the lots . Such would encroach on some of t?--,e easement area, if left intact . Thus vacating the unnecessary easements makes common sense. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, a SE-LU PROPERTIES Y__aF TRADEMARK HOMES, INC �. By Finance and Accounting Offices 14050 S W.Pacific HAI Portland.Oregon 97223 Telephone:503 684 1020 USE O PUBLIC LANDS GENERALLY; SCENIC EASEMENT-, 271.1111 DEFINITIONS vacated to its termini, the land embraced in an extension of the street for a distance of 400 271.005 Definitions. As used in this feet beyond each terminus shall also be count- chapter: ed. In the vacation of any plat or part thereof (1) "Governing body" means the board or the consent of the owner or owners of two- body in which the general legislative power of thirds in area of the property embraced within a political subdivision is vested. such plat or part thereof proposed to be vacat- (2) "Governmental body" means the State ed shall b--sufficient, except where such vaca- of Oregon, a political subdivision, the United tion embraces street area, when, as to such States of America or an agency thereof. street area the above requirements shall also apply. The consent of the owners of the re- (3) "Political subdivision" means any local government unit, including, but not limited and d amount of property shall be in writing and duly acknowledged before an officer au- to, a county, city, town, port, dock commissionI or district, that exists under the laws of thoriyed to take acknowledgments of deeds. Oregon and has power to levy and collect 271,090 Filing of petition; notice. The taxes. [1981 c.787 §21 petition shall be presented to the city recorder or other recording officer of the city. If found VACATION by him to be sufficient, he shall file it and inform at least one of the petitioners when the s 271.010 [Amended by 1965 c.25 §1; 1971 c.287 §1; repealed by 1981 c.153§7s] petition will come before the city governing body. A failure to give such information shall 271.020 (Amended by 1953 c.283 §3; 1977 c.275 §1; not be in any respect a lack of jurisdiction for repealed by 1981 c.153§79] the governing body to proceed on the petition. 271.030 (Amended by 1953 c.283 §3; repealed by 1981 c.153§791 271.100 Action by council. The city 271.040[Repeated by 1981 c.153§79] governing body may deny the petition after notice to the petitioners of such proposed 271.050[Repealed by 1981 c.153§791 action, but if there appears to be no reason 271.060(Repealed by 1981 c.153§791 why the petition should not be allowed in 271.070[Repeated by 1981 c.153§79l whole or in part, the governing body shall fix a time for a formal hearing upon the petition. t 271.080 Vacation in incorporated cities; petition; consent of property own- 271.110 Notice of hearing. (1) The city ers. (1) Whenever any person interested in recorder or other recording officer of the city any real property in an incorporated city in shall give notice of the petition and hearing this state desires to vacate all or part of any by publishing a notice in the city official E street, avenue, boulevard, alley, plat, public newspaper once each week for four consecu- square or other public place, such person may tive weeks. If no newspaper is published in file a petition therefor setting forth a descrip such city, written notice of the petition and tion of the ground proposed to be vacated, the hearing shall be posted in three of the most f purpose for which the ground is proposed to be public places in the city. The notices shall used and the reason for such vacation. describe the ground covered by the petition, (2) There shall be appended to such peti- give the date it was filed, the name of at least tion,as a part thereof and as a basis for grant- petition, of the petitioners and the date when the 1 in the same, the consent of the owners of all petition, and any objection or remonstrance, g which may be made in writing and filed with s abutting property and of not less than two- the recording officer of the city prior to the thirds in area of the real property affected time of hearing,will be heard and considered. thereby. The real property affected thereby g shall be deemed to be the land lying on either (2) Within five days after the first day of l side of the street or portion thereof proposed publication of the notice the city recording to be vacated and extending laterally to the officer shall cause to be posted at or near each l next street that serves as a parallel street, but end of the proposed vacation a copy of the in any case not to exceed 200 feet, and the notice which shall be headed, "Notice of Street land for a like lateral distance on either side Vacation," "Notice of Plat Vacation" or "No- of the street for 400 feet along its course be- tice of Plat and Street Vacation," as the case yond each terminus of the part proposed to be may be; the notice shall be posted in at least a� vacated. Where a street is proposed to be two conspicuous places in the F r-oposed vaca- 967 E i 271.120 PUBLIC LANDS i tion area. The posting and first day of publica- (3) No ordinance for the vacation of all or ' tion of such notice shall be not less than 28 part of a plat shall be passed by the governing days before the hearing. body until the city recording officer has filed in his office or indorsed on the petition for (3) The city -recording officer shall, before such vacation a certificate showing that all publishing such notice, obtain from the peti- city liens and all taxes have been paid on the tioners a sum sufficient to cover the cost of lands covered by the plat or portion thereof to publication, posting and other anticipated be vacated. expenses. The city recording officer shall hold (4) An property owner affected by the the sum so obtained until the actual cost has y p y bascertained, when the amount of the cost order of vacation or the order awarding dam- been n be rtaipaid into the city treasury and any ages or benefits in such vacation proceedingsshall q surplus refunded to the depositor. may appeal to the circuit court of the county where such city is situated in the manner f 271.120 Hearing; determination. At provided by the city charter. If the charter the time fixed by the governing body for hear- does not provide for such appeal, the appeal z ing the petition and any objections filed there- shall be taken within the time and in substan- to or at any postponement or continuance of tially the manner provided for taking an such matter, the governing body shall hear appeal from justice or district court in civil the petition and objections and shall deter- cases. mine whether the consent of the owners of the 271.140 Title to vacated areas. The requisite area has been obtained, whether r notice has been duly given and whether the title to the street or other public area vacated public interest will be prejudiced by the vaca- shall attach to the lands bordering on such , If area in equal portions; except that where the tion of such plat or street or parts thereof. such matters are determined in favor of the area has been originally dedicated by differ- petition the governing body shall by ordinance ent persons and the fee title to such area has make such determination a matter of record not been otherwise disposed of, original and vacate such plat or street; otherwise it boundary lines shall be adhered to and the street area which lies on each side of such shall deny the petition. The governing body _ may, upon hearing, grant the petition in part boundary line shall attach to the abutting property on such side. If a public square is and deny it in part, and make such reserva- vacated the title thereto shall vest in the city. i tions, or either, as appear to be for the public ' interest. [Amended by 1381 c.153§581 271.130 Vacation on council's own 271.150 Vacation records to be filed; c motion; appeal. (1) The city governing body costs. A certified copy of the ordinance vacat- may initiate vacation proceedings authorized ing any street or plat area and any map, plat by ORS 271.080 and make such vacation or other record in regard thereto which may be required or provided for by law, shall be without a petition or consent of property own- filed for record with the county clerk. The ex—s. Notice shall be given as provided by ORS petitioner for such vacation shall bear the 271.110, but such vacation shall not be made recording cost and the cost of preparing and before the date set for hearing, nor if the filing the certified copy of the ordinance and p owners of a majority of the area affected, map. A certified copy of any such ordinance computed on the basis provided in ORS G shall be filed with the county assessor and { 271.080, object in writing thereto, nor shall county surveyor. any street area be vacated without the consent of the owners of the abutting property if the 271.160 Vacations for purposes of vacation will substantially affect the market rededication.No street shall be vacated upon value of such property, unless the city govern- the petition of any person when it is proposed E ing body provides for paying damages. Provi- to replat or rededicate all or part of any street sion for paying such damages may be made by in lieu of the original unless such petition is j a local assessment, or in such other manner as accompanied by a plat showing the proposed the city charter may provide. manner of replatting or rededicating. If the l (2) Two or more streets, alleys, avenues proposed manner of replatting or rededicating and boulevards, or parts thereof, may be or any modification thereof which may subse- 1 joined in one proceeding, provided they inter- quently be made meets with the approval of �! sect or are adjacent and parallel to each other. the city governing body, it shall require a f i 968 ,� E TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL City of Tigard County of Washington r.. State of Oregon C In the Matter of the vacation ) of lands described as : ) 5 ' & 10 ' Utility Easements ) PETITION FOR VACATION on Lots 1-22 Summer Lake A subdivision located in ) Washington County, City of ) . Tigard ) Petitioners hereby request that the hereinbelow described area be vacated, for the following described reason(s) : _ All utilities to service said lots are in place in the front Yard ' _ easement Vacation will allow the builder to place buildings _ to most effectively utilize the remaining dot area. _ (1) That the undersigned is in fact the owner(s) or the contract purchaser(s) of the indicated property(s) . (2) That the undersigned represent tracts in or adjacent to the affected area as hereinbelow described. (3) That the cost of this vacation is to be borne by the benefited properties and in respect thereto respectfully show: ( That the area proposed hereby to be vacated by the aforementioned owners/purchasers comprises approximately 0 acres , and is legally described hereinbelow (or on the attached sheet marked Exhibit "A" which by reference herein is made a part hereof) and is illustrated on the _ attached drawing marked Exhibit "B" (which by reference herein is made a part hereof) : A 10 ' Utility Easement along rear lot line of Lots 1-22 Summer Lake and a S ' Utility aasemPnt along side lot lin of Tntc 2-9 . 11 and 14- 22 Summer Lake . WHEREFORE, petitioners request that said lands be vacated as herein requested and described and that the City Council of the City of Tigard, Oregon, expedite proceedings to that end as provided by law. TAX MAP # RECORDING SIGNATURE ADDRESS TAX TOOT # NUMBER ISI-33AD 490 81030258 Se-Lu Pro erties &ihilliam T. V u n dba Trademark Plaza by b - 5120 SW Hewett St . Attached SE-LU, ro ert ' ps Portland, OR 97221 Sheet A -44alc . Lu z 1S,1-33AD-02300 ?q01&6e-e-2 Ami Develo men L Z I 14050 S .W. Pacific H Portland, Oregon 97223 Ra it ie 7185 SV SAtiDBURG STREET,POR'll AtiI).OREGON 9223•(503)620-8080 �t LOT ADDRESS TAX MAP # TAX LOT # RECORDING 1 10600 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 2700 B47 P37 2 10620 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 2800 B47 P37 3 10640 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 2900 B47 P37 4 10660 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3000 B47 P37 5 10680 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3100 B47 P37 6 10700 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3200 B47 P37 7 10720 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3300 B47 P37 8 10740 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3400 B47 P37 9 10760 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 3500 B47 P37 10 10780 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3600 B47 P37 12735 SW BURDOCK STREET ISI-33AD 3600 B47 P37 C 11 12740 SW BURDOCK STREET ISI-33AD ' 3700 B47 P37 12 12750 SW BURDOCK STREET ISI- 33AD 3800 B47 P37 10790 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI -33AD 3800 B47 P37 13 10800 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 3900 B47 P37 14 10820 SW SUMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 4000 B47 P37 15 10840 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI-33AD 4100 B47 P37 16 10860 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 4200 B47 P37 17. 10880 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 4300 B47 P37 18 10900 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 4400 B47 P37 19 10920 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 4500 B47 P37 20 10940 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 4600 B47 P37 21 10960 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI - 33AD 4700 B47 P37 22 10980 SW SUMMER LAKE DRIVE ISI- 33AD 4800 B47 P37 "SATISFACTION IS OUR MAIN CONCERN" ® RHONE(503) 639-1131 / 12000 S. W. 66th AVE. TIGARD. OREGON 97223 L= February 9 , 1983 City Council FEB 4 1983 City of Tigard c/o Planning Denartment 12755 SW Ash Tigard OR 97223 It has just come to my attention that the land fronting 66th Avenue around my dealership is zoned CP. I also understand that map issues in NP04 have cleared the planning department and will have final resolution at the City Council meeting. Understanding that this is the final hour for changes , I ask that the following zoning changes be considered as reasonable and there- fore approved by the City Council; Request the vacant land between 66th and 68th Avenues in the triangle area be zone changad from CP . to C-5 . Our dealership was constructed and has operated as Highway Commercial for over 10 years . I anticipate continuing strong growth of our business in the short term and a resulting need for more land, especially new and used vehicle storage and display space. Assuming that our facility will be grandfathered, there is no other land in our vicinity zoned for our usage. If we don't have room for expansion and display, then for the long term we would be forced to look outside of Tigard for an acceptable business location, which is not our druthers . Our specific request is for the land surrounding our dealership plus tax lots 6700 , 6800 , 6900 , 7000 , 7100 , 7200 , 7300 and 7301 on county assessors map 2S 1 IAA. However our general request is that all of the vacant land between 66th and 68th be zoned C-5 . The area has a good growth potential as Highway Commercial since it fronts on Inter- state 5 and would attract good business . The C-5 zoning should be very compatable with the surrounding CP zoning and in fact complement and enhance one another. In summary, I believe the zoning change is a reasonably prudent request and ask that the City Council adopt the change at the next meeting. Very truly yours , ANDMAF RO, INC. im Cor ss ice President JC/bjc 'x r/ LU.) FEB 1 `.. 1983 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. February 89 1983 City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 = Tigard, Ore. 97223 Attn: Jeremy Coursolle Associate Planner Re: 1S135DC Tax lot 4.00 AKA 11795 SW Greenburg Rd. Enclosed please find a plot plan of my property. I would like you or the City Council to move the CP zone over one lot to obtain the zone I feel is appropriate. T On one side of my property is a large office building and on the other side is a duplex under construction. It would be an economic hardship on the value of my property if not zoned CP. Siz}cerely9 a' :UH. Schacht 3 i cF i( i i t t i F t B h♦nY W 2 f h 100tZ F n 0 ti 11 (r >> F E N00°3T'W to N n O m O N < o to O m 80.13 9LS 6oc°4 1 m v o O a 0 rm v� o o C'% O m ' � ••��,., ldr'- 28285 North 80.13 a rTo Public 724/747T9-C 576/600 ras 1839 i SOcG ;.�• _. TO PUBLIC 376-G02 4 170 P + W. rx C' _ SOo°19'E 251,50 .. 1 St 253 AV E',•o \ 87.Z3 n BO azo 80 80 63 70 183 �p z N V cn N J N `� w -4 Cnto 3C N N m W O N N Ln b O N y �N 1° n�_ rp 41 w Y O �nso V OO 4 ® rlr ��+o m .0 500:+ 19 E ^I m o 80 S OOo WE 63 ' 87,07 m A 0N ' so 91-63 70 f'p 110 vrpr`A a Ar T2 ®° _ OB19N 00°19W 1730 O(D La AC0 aO 14 0 ! O O m �p O N cm °cn r s` n V i„ r a O ra y u u n �' Lour' � N QJ°21'W S 00124'E SOO"24 E 4yt O 86.90 80 8o 8D 9177 103-09 LINCOLN pp��••►► @@��T,,O THE PUBLIC D.V. 261-1111 `, qt t. lBVi� OLl�i i'i�E�ilU� 4e � o°Is,' Ey4.1 68.60 S 00 03'w 232.61 _ NO 106.1 90.00y 36.76 n 1.64 126 Cn b y --j ' �1 kj (0 w n� IID � 4. � � �9 e�O / F'� O O o CSJI a o e ^ ~ s T n1 Ln �` J C s30. m n ro� I °/ \ �V •!, /•gS�B`� N O°16,M/ ISO so so m _ _ CO OD C6 0 to ' � S O. 16'E p1e .79.3 80 so e0 s �t•':I�/uL�..�.-'<'• �'I/v �/J.nfYAY.(J/.%//�.Yi///////////.v//!/lY/Lf/dx:0///H/////.5'////i // �.,. ,. .�•.� :..(y;E•�� .. .. � +� C p — — —y9Jo\�— to V\ W C.R. NO. 1766 90t h b L A t S` 3 ° �// m ®I 0Oj V / r ? 9'b Opy i r 60 } `o ® i < y � � r • f 7®i Mawr. Y First American Title Insurance Company- of Oregon An Assumed DuSlnes3 n.me o/TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 12012 S.W. CANYON ROAD, BEAVERTON, OR 97005 (503) 641-7000 CONSUMER INFORMATION REPORT Prepared for Cash' s Realty _ 12525 5W Main miga,-A () Armor,,, 97223 — Attn. Jerry cash 2/3/83 Date Prepared Property Address 11795 SPT Greenbury Road Enclosed please find the following information per your request: TAX INFORMATION Tax Account Number 1S135DC 400 Description . 24AC Assessed Value-Land 22, 000 true cash Assessed Value-improvements 30, 200 true cash 1982-83 Tax Amounts 1033 .50 state paid 191.95 Assessed Owner Erwin H Jr and Marjorie W Schacht Map Copy Deed/Contract/Other Document of Record 921/81 This title information has been furnished, without charge, in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions inter- mediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds; indescriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No lia- bility is assumed for any errors in this report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. Please remember First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon for your Escrow and Title Insurance needs. AGENTS and OFFICES in the following counties in Oregon: BENTON, CLACKAMAS, COOS, CROOK, CURRY, DESCHUTES, DOUGLAS, GILLIAM, HOOD RIVER, JACKSON, JEFFERSON, JOSEPHINE, KLAMATH, LANE, LINCOLN, LINN, MALHEUR, MARION, MULTNOMAH, POLK, SHERMAN, TILLAMOOK, UMATILLA, UNION,WALLOWA,WASCO, WASHINGTON, WHEELER and YAMHILL. TI 73 3/82 02(23183 e • s 9 ijaialala�a!°Iol° aµlai+ tiljlli 4 t 7itl/II ( 111i 4!4 Ijt ri7 t7i tit It. ( ( ! (t�tlT ! ( � `t I-F.fRg 1tt III .I-�,I I i ( I>lilt)tIIltli�l�ltitltltltla(°hllit�°1'Iatt(titl°I'„talal°ia(tl1Jita(+I1I°le'°tal°►i '._,.`�_ NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED �:---___.._...._.I 2._ $ 5 6 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THANAM THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO TW QUALITY OF TF€ORIGINAL DRAWING. OE 6Z BZ LZ QZ SZ 3Z EZ u IZ 0Z 6t Q1— [I --91 Sf i i E! 21 II 01 6 8 ''.aaa�°aadana�aanlaut(uetiaa°t�aualuta�4n4�� I�•u� It •!^ a L+t! -' - _I d N tlema� tams! �i1H � MAn 71� . _ •a- On1vINA "p p( A 6U601V1610N Of A POFTION Of THE fir6T HAIL ow 76G10N J9, TOWMWIV I70U1N,p,-NBf WOOT W.M. ply �p� uBp�/�.� ®g //P��6�16e11y}SO�Iv1410N Of P IOMfIeN OF:Of Ik I�A OOaT10N Of LOT ID Of TN6 "I•bH VAL66Y TLN6T" (197 ®P 110 �®AS)HI`&TON &OLI 6!� OR.WN Sam R55CUFlTEbII`inc no JtlNE,1919 NITIAL PoINT ALL SPACES I;,UST BE ENDORSED Ira - uaz.Dt L Ftl_RIOR TO APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS t •° o_rr r DrnTDATE - -rrr rTE_nLr Nq A. cr RD v.Arca 1/�� °n�r 67 / i � S'✓ 5'v e¢ 59 59 cnEFAL TCLC w nATLa A. - J��• l •rE/L�8 , b REGISTERED Nz t 9 t PROFESSIONAL 711 SURVEYOR ,. Ta OR[GON /:•� _ 37 .. 1` :.1 11 LV4IRICE'E.S6iR1i ' r :,31 �� srs umnWwL.cc es ..xalrm cn t 54 4 �• c I l Y l 3 `I. 73 ' a, 1.27x'74'. ti - 1 14 t1 L 15 �O`09e rz•e,.rc, X. z• .w.... ear • 11 ' _ 5D 16 101ta009 / \ / 41 -L�_= Qo 4 �� 34 `s y 19 114�1 15 \�` 41 4 / a - //"� i L it a` ' - l •'1 '( 193 .:. 1 �... ,/j_' - �, r � -•. �:. ' �/ - c. 4l• 191 r\ 12� [ )r uo A. T�• `'- � - 1l ..II4 I �' 104 I Sl / �S % / \•• _ 'rtihc P'C"R') ...> .. 4N PDb"d'w 1D758D f00 - 06 •84 w r3 1 3 _ ; ND•OC)7"W--610.12 .•r r rxn, �. r -r-aae n. a •r a:. r 1.. 3 $e r. . SN C'Of'b1"W 100.00 ND'OI'31"W tE6.)6 ' ands 3n � < wiee .�'.J,a•.4•er .r, rn. .-.yen r NP 6'M•w� 'WL UN 1 ,�5a'14"w - _-....:- �,....._t_-:.... .... r. _. __ e -—._....__... -,.=,,tea,,,•. ..-..�..-„_-�i.,�,_ .... _ _ _ �-; - �III'I'I+NIIpIg111PIl IIPII�Ii91pI11lll11�+PIIP�+P1TFimtgill++PI+t1IT]OqIPlII+Igll4+II ItIRllll lllll,tlllgllgll+lll+lttq+IIPppl+l ligl�IIIIlplllllryllf lllq+l+pliR1• _ NutE: IF rNss NlcrroFluED - 1 2 3 4 5 6 17 6! 9 10 11 12 URAIIING IS LESS CLEAR 1NAN 4w in rxxs NoncF,n is DUE tD IIE QUALITY OF TIE ORIGINAL of sz oz c11z-az s1z_1 vzez zz-Iz oz Gr of-LI_91 S-1 s1 Er zl 11 of-s et a' s t' E z I= rllltlllllllllllllllll dlRNxuLIxIIIn51NRFllgt�lItdimhl�ILS�(�yy11ID41Y1jLlytt�y (Iy�nIOp�OpH I Ire I '� I—°t^^N—�••I lu I a I I LIR I I�ltuln 1h+�In lnul i d nlllDliOry 4X s MARCS 7 51990 - a �e \ v 12 ® ' E n •, ��c �] D� cruet �j,72z 3 3 8 CITY OF TIGARD �� 3J F -3 PLANNING DEPT. -7z z.3 r�J � -� � � .�� RECEIVED FEB 2 1983 CITY OF TIGARD F-: f February 28, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Department of Planning and Development . SUBJECT: Commercial Designations C-3 and C-5 The existing zoning map generally indicates two zones along Pacific Highway (C-3 and C-5). C-3 is General Commercial and C-5 is Highway Commercial. (There are also a few isolated areas on Scholls Ferry Road, Hwy. 217 and I-5. ) The list of permitted uses for both of these zones are similar to a point that it is difficult to distinguish where the C-3 zoning areas end and C-5 areas begin. In addition, there are many existing uses within the C-3 zone that are not permitted uses or conditional uses, yet appear to be compatible with those uses that are existing conforming uses. Because of this ;- "mixing" of uses within these two zones the City Attorney's office and the Planning Department discussed the possibility of elminating the two similar zones and create one General Commercial zone. The permitted uses of this z General Commercial zone would mirror those uses currently permitted in the 1 existing C-5 zone, which is more permiss -*n than the C-3 zone. In addition, ' staff believes that the nomenclature on comprehensive plan should also be changed from C-L (Linear Commercial) to C-G (General Commercial). Linear f Commercial could continue to denote a strip commercial concept, especially along Pacific Highway. Because of the continual congestion problems along Pacific Highway, staff would like to continue to encourage shopping center developments which tend to have fewer access points onto Pacific Highway. Staff recommends that this issue should be discussed in more detail during deliberation of these Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies document. } ch (0051P) r F i r 1 RECEIVED P 1983 Fc .uj=z ?5, 7933 CITY IUB TIGARD y i u .�. 12-L✓../.:u?:_� �=-Gt.vZUl� u� 21933 u, ;.Gr i933 Wi.t s C•;c:r-r 72755 S. 97223 J !C�FJ cv! szRA c' �'L _t° l�.,zc1r�r,_ J, C lL•. Fcf 'l ' i1G U2 /Isl=tGLl�•t _, 1 ;r. f' 11 .� .;!:%2CL 1 G: rL U i' C.lt tici.,;L .-Ur2L L�JS .in .t_/uTcuz : � c�LQz; c ane c 5rr r er_' iLa;z .i r=5', J c,-,z -Ln d ccC72C:I-'ILG� CJ-/ /' .:.v L-5 C7_1) r orL a a ezr.c T cup L at 5700, ;�z 7 S 7 36 J-p �cacc /rte crza,� e Sze �a.2i�z^ o L Tc.s L_.at° 5700 til `5 tlLm J, on- .S.t�tc els, I S (t f [P F t Fr 7'1 February 11, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Department of Planning and Developmentw-° SUBJECT: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Interim Zoning Map On February 8, 1983 the Planning Commission completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Interim Zoning Map. Zhe two attached maps represent the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City . Council. The shaded areas on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates areas that were changed from the original land use map by the Planning Commission. The definitions of the two maps are as follows: The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates general land use types, residential versus commercial or open space. The Interim Zoning Map indicates the specific zone of any given parcel of land and specifies the actual development standards. The City Council will begin their review of these maps on Wednesday, February 23, 1983. pm (0051P) 14EI40RANDUM TO: Members of the City Council FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE: March 1, 1983 SUBJECT: Garages At the request of Councilor Scott, my staff contacted several Oregon communities to determine if any had policies requiring enclosed parking areas for each new dwelling unit constructed in the community. Following are the results of the telephone survey: Question: Does your city have a policy which requires enclosed parking areas for each new dwelling unit built in your city? CITY YES NO — x Beaverton x Lake Oswego x Portland Tualatin x x Hillsboro x Gresham Oregon City x West Linn covered, only single family x x Gladstone x Forest Grove Wilsonville x Only one of the eleven cities surveyed currently has a policy, West Linn. West Linn is now revising its development code and intends to retain the policy. The policy requires that each single family dwelling provide for two off street parking spaces, one of which must be covered. This requirement is presently within West Linn's parking requirement. Should Tigard choose to adopt a policy requiring covered parking for all single family homes, or all dwelling units, Council may wish to begin the policy as follows: The City shall require the provision of no less than two off street parking areas, one of which must be provided as a covered structure for each new dwelling unit constructed in Tigard. 1 .t MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the City Council yy�� FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development DATE: March 2, 1983 RE: TURA Density During the Comprehensive Plan hearing on February 23, 1983 an issue was raised by John Butler, Chairman of NPO # 1 concerning the minimum density contained in Implementation Strategy 1. h. on page 7 of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Finding Policies and Implementation Strategies. Strategy l.h. states that the density will be forty units per arce or higher. I have researched the minutes of the TURA Advisory Committee, the original source of the strategy, to determine if their recommendation was to allow for high density residential in the TURA area. Staff's intent was to include that recommendation without modification within the Comprehensive Plan. My research led me to the minutes of the Committee on October 13, 1982 (copy attached) which states that the density for the special district will be 20 - 40 units per acre. The Committee's intent was to provide for a minimum of twenty units per acre to a maximum of forty units. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the strategy l.h on page 7 be changed to read ". . . .as well as higher density residential use up to 40 units per acre." on F q y OF DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 m Fe surd 25, 7983 JELJ11(S`, ) F -!t 23, 7983 = .erzc, Lgn .isz ,mss—�`zc to u-e ':aul- a ' n Cau1L c�C ,, an iia=A 2, 7 983 Ci,.•ttc CatuL.cL� Cztrr a,_ .c,lo i Xat�. D t tszuZt 12755 S. V. r12 Ti �lug, O&o -an 97223 'Ie harfe des �uu f t Lc�zclsG�zia Frr�c.', 3n-r— t�'vtau. ..' cz-�t rG F -gaalu 9, 7983 adcLt��so .ta cLta Cay °, C&f�4 o< T :cnc', hcw Gam.^ _! . ;u�C t:'r� znd .6u,--zo!ndir_r tAel-s a h i_tz, twit i ciL i�,tp-sa e-stz, .at✓ned �� , in•c. on in e n uL rr-ct Lja6 t, :tee &Yu r,mac' .ta C-5 Zan-bz . Tha C-,%z- alj! �1f1 SLC n_C.U.CJL aC�1JS2d LLcS 17-- _tJ� 2fl�ti tJtLLL1L .LS iJLe 1&ec-6 na I-M act Iau-i v- 3 can-e--z. r .c nz- i r- :z- -LJla t th ;PaL�I .tanc.ijz✓- t'tc�t t:-z .Zaa Tax Lai6 nr-we . -en F•a u' .�cam'✓r�r i, i r c e 1970 w e ah that tAe-sr Fcx L czz a zd ��tan a :'a-.ca.-ted St/,cct s a..Lan-, tut'z Amu' Tax , Lata a.r..d parr trans a,P i�G��r1 Sir t� aurzed °: 1u_3, 7n^_. -�-Lc zan con! G5. LE^,�-ED TC 1fl/.'4'4�. FOil), 3;: L� t sed to ,+-'ieonao Fouad aru ee :tea. Fa,--:' Ca. 1970) i,'ap 1 S 7 36 DD 1900 'w! 5000 ALU 5700 5800 pa�t i.orz 7ia,ja 2 S 1 7 :zl 100 .�L'�C (FavzetiF_rr 700, 100, 300) 7700 f art t-an l iap 7 S 1 36 DD "800 ( Ie tn� ZZe A -ee LPt t ilz c-6 r✓Lan e2 i s Ler.-d.et'. .ta Jlz L hip ann _v�at�✓Lt`t i,t.-Vwnai-t 1-L X-Z-tan OwTf 5800 !a2ti an na te�z.ec'.ic .Inc. It liar 2 S 7 1 .4D! 7400 ' 7301 (Faure 'c jw t o 1300) a 1200 (iir a ao is c c des ;l'_arri,,eiz 5400 avid i a.26o Vacated S. tJ. E&&uvzz t 7700 !o2tr as nat 'Lwz,, t _tcr Lancs'^arra Fo�z�', .7n c. (7700 t z a ,Jzez s 7500, 7600, 7700) i "' or iJZe ar�arre izaL� Tax Lata a onr, to Fand L LJPILFriJLiJL c naa e �Sa t CL f ' G2 an 0 � �'/<� 7967 (`acr2 40 /tea 23 a: and r2eaa- trtiarz c� 0 %� 67-350. c arzrri_aaLorr��s �-0u�uzcr�) unci c 4: DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 1D CL4,1 CowLau P a:_e 2 F.e-Pju2a1t-,t 25, 1983 oum .aizeai .i A,--Caw-.6z r a �em amt o-o .tne f_,,nc, .a;zcar�a�.ec' t r �'u� e�tf✓c erz� awned -aj DAyJn-c. and T. L. 5700 [:1,2m 1,S 1 36 DDB rr-necl �� G, L. 4-e- �--a d G5. -7t_ i a i ny.ovc t�uLt tJi�i a�E' t}Le�, '1 1-3,--a to L wys&zatiA Fwwy Jrzc. 4c --an--dilze zair� az l a Lot 400 tJiu t 1,1 owned f�'rtFad LzcL&ir&- a,�c' i eve f o:�r �t anc! E a ec' f a LaruG h FovLd, Jnr. e s true .tires Ce�.z arta .tai^ntlze - J.t L6 aur. <izc t .tinen�z a,»�z tem ar_r,Led D-0 Jnc. arrr' X w-3--d to a Fan d det-- � iu m .in -cn j mLatLaa L�•'z .tiu t u�S�rL?,3iS 3 tr c_e 1970 cJ.7rL'rz' ca,ze un d�L ILa �scsrze Guard,6a�e/L'z Ua^ ".e a.3 tlLe T2'Lai��r�1 o r ec_' Fes^ci L en�is��. ane' :).eve. a;�z t e the .E'.e"z t. t D".,° 2a�' Famd Cmy -rL-, A-1 oanzo Fond, aru_' Lar 6i:z rh on-d, Jr" iza,3 /zad taLtiz D,�B, -7,r-r- -L3 t-i arZ .ta .tiuV me r_ 'ti,t E c. Fan d C'an�aiu , ;�°orrza Fat ' err' Laazcnza,zA Fond L-,3 iuza! w-t-tiz Fo, a! L 3 u u:, arc' L1 ezre earnLerL1. i Ja Swruzav,, zra lz i_e z the— zaurzc- zharzo'c .0 a fz��sar�1'�s :�✓Lua� 2ec��s t �airidirzcr. a..P- -thejvtaF�trf rzeri t.L a � in t iii .-hies neaei.ves tl,a .arum zanuin and .tlze, cv-6a liz a.3h that .t/Le- C.i_.4 i ourLc-U ac2q-2-t thea- charge a-t the r---�--t 17aee .,bm. J� c U the ;mac azrs t� rzer -c .uz t a-6 .P�_t�c do.�s act zz-e c .e- .i�. .sarr e C-5 zani n f, th'a z y t G. L. ��.LL G.ena.CCluze L. '3a.� GLB.A- 1 {t I8 `i i E i S t 9 ICE O Ot Is 001 V - oa �.k1v. t Asa -.9%j-=Lam, L 1 1 = r.� s;z z ate Qz TT s t i ll A ezluz z 1,66 e 1 91 IL Z oa �6Z 009 i �Z O089 ilk L91 CL OT 6Z SIC 1£ 00IS �£ Zi ££ 006£ tpe 01 � n 0009 A �OOZS 001 6� j T T T ,r T -AL ESTATE CONTRACT OF F *RCHASE THIS CONTRACT is made as of this 25th day of June, 1980 by AMART DEVELOPMENT LTD. , an Oregon corporation, herein called "Seller" and SELU PROPERTIES, a general partnership, herein called "Purchaser". WIT NESSE TH: Seller agrees to sell to purchaser and purchaser agrees to purchase from seller for the price and on the terms and conditions set forth below that certain real property, and all improvements thereon, situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: SELU PROPERTIES, 5120 S. W. Hewett, Portland, Oregon 97221. Purchase Price and Time Payment Provisions 1. Purchaser promises to pay as the total purchase price for the property the sum of Two Million Two Huidred Seventy-four 'Thousand and no/ 100 ($2, 274, 000. 00) Dollars. Such amount shall be paid as follows: a. The sum of Four Hundred Fifty-four Thousand Eight Hundred and no/ 100 ($454, 800. 00) Dollars paid on the execution hereof, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. b. The balance of One Million Eight Hundred Nineteen Thousand Two Hundred and no/ 100 ($1, 819, 200. 00) Dollars shall be payable in three (3) annual installments of Six Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred and no/ 100 ($606, 400. 00) Dollars with the first payment to be made one year from date plus interest at four (4) percent and a like payment plus interest at four (4) percent for two succeeding years. E E ..�. aim— c. All ui_ id balances of principal shall sr interest as follows: (i) At the rate of four percent (41j6) per annum. (ii) All payments of interest shall be in addition to the payments of the principal sum as above provided and shall be paid at the time required for the payment of principal. d. Purchaser shall have the right to prepay a part or the whole of the balance of the pruchase price at any time. Payment of principal shall apply as a reduction of the annual principal payment due in that particular year. Taxes and Liens 2. All taxes levied against the property for the current tax year shall be prorated between the seller and the purchaser as of the date of possession. Purchaser agrees to pay when due all taxes and assessments which are hereafter levied against the property and to keep the property free from all public, municipal and statutory liens which may thereafter lawfully be imposed upon the property. Purchaser shall keep seller advised of any proposed assessment against the property by any governmental body where such assessment shall. be for other than general county taxes, and purchaser shall not agree to any voluntary assessment or improvement bond or the like without the consent of the seller. Purchaser may elect to pay assessments in accordance with any available installment method. If purchaser objects in good faith to the validity or amount of any such tax or assessment; purchaser, at purchaser's sole expense, may contest the validity or amount of the tax or assessment. Indemnification 3. Purchaser shall indemnify and defend seller from any claim, loss or liability arising "out of or related to any activity of purchaser on the property or any condition of the property. 2. Covenants of Seller 4. Seller covenants that seller is the owner of good and marketable title to the property and that said property is free of all liens and encumbrances except those described on Exhibit B hereof and shall be free of all liens created or arising through or under seller when seller delivers possession of said real property to purchaser. Seller warrants that the property will be improved with public streets with concrete gutters and will be served with public water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage facilities in accordance with the requirements of the City of Tigard and Washington County, Oregon. Seller at its expense agrees to promptly repair any damage to public streets, curbs, sewer, water and drainage facilities for a period of one year subsequent to the completion of the improvements, on the condition that such-- damage uch -damage is as a result of faulty materials or workmanship, but shall not be liable for damage caused for any other reason. t Insurance 5. Seller shall furnish at seller's expense a purchaser's title insurance policy in the amount of $2, 274, 000. 00 as soon as practicable from the date of closing, insuring purchaser against loss or damage sustained by purchaser by reason of the unmarketability of seller's title, or liens or encumbrances thereon, except matters contained in the usual printed exceptions in such title insurance policies and further accept the exceptions to the title as provided on Exhibit B hereof. Deed and Lot Release Provisions 6. a. Deed On the execution hereof, seller shall deposit with Pioneer National 'Title Insurance Co. , Beaverton, Oregon office, deeds to all of the lots 3. ... described on Exhibit said deeds to be on a form at,, ched hereto and marked Exhibit C. { b. Seller shall instruct Pioneer National Title Insurance Company (escrow agent) to release each deed so placed in escrow upon payment of schedule attached, for the account of the seller. Default 7. The following shall be the provisions of default: a. Time is of the essence of this contract. A default shall occur if: (i) Purchaser fails to make any payment at the time required and within fifteen (15) days after recept of written notice when it is due; (ii) Purchaser fails to perform any other obligation imposed by this contract and does not correct or commence correction of such failure { within thirty (30) days after recept of written notice from seller specifiying the manner in which purchaser is in default; or (iii) Purchaser becomes insolvent, a receiver is appointed to take possession of all or a substantial part of purchaser's properties, purchaser makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors or files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, or is otherwise voluntarily or involuntarily made subject to any of the bankruptcy laws of the United States. b. In the event of a default, seller may take any one or more of the following steps: (i) Declare the entire balance of this purchase price and interest immediately due and payable; (ii) Foreclose this contract by suit in equity, providing that under any interlocutory decree of foreclosure, purchaser shall be entitled to a period 4. of one hundred eight• 180) days to pay the total amot due under such decree. (iii) Specifically enforce the payment terms of this contract by suit in equity. C. Upon default and application to a court of competent jurisdiction, seller shall be entitled to the appointment of a receiver whether or not the apparent value of the property exceeds the amount of the balance due hereunder. Employment by seller shall disqualify a person from serving as a receiver. Upon taking possession of all or any part of the property, the receiver may: (i) Use, operate, manage, control and conduct business on the property and make expenditures for all reasonable improvements and maintenance as in its judgment are proper; (ii) Collect all rents, revenues, income, issues and profits - from the property and apply such sums to the expenses of use, operation and management; (iii) At seller's option, complete any construction in progress on the property, and in that connection, pay bills, borrow funds, employ con- tractors and make any reasonable changes in plans or specifications as seller deems appropriate. If the revenues produced by the property are insufficient to pay expenses, upon order of the court the receiver may borrow from seller or otherwise such sums as may be necessary for the purposes stated in this paragraph, and repayment of such sums shall be secured by this contract. The amounts borrowed or advanced shall bear interest at the same rate as the balance of t the purchase price hereunder from the date of expenditure until repaid and shall be payable by purchaser upon demand. 5. S. Any notice u er this contract shall be in wr ig and shall be effective when actually delivered or when deposited in the mail, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, addressed to the parties, at the following addresses or such other addresses as either party may designate by written notice to the other: To the Seller: Amart Development, Ltd. 8925 S. W. Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy Portland, OR 97225 To the Purchaser: Arthur A. Lutz 5120 S. W. Hewett Portland, OR 97221 Waiver 9. Failure of seller at any time to require performance of any provision of this contract shall not limit the right of seller to enforce the provision, nor shall any waiver by seller of any breach of any provision be a waiver of any succeeding breach of that provision or waiver of that provision itself or any other provisions. Attorney's' Fees and Costs 10. In the event suit or action is instituted to enforce any of the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party such sum as the Court- may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial or on appeal of such suit or action in addition to all other sums provided by law. Successor Interest 11. This contract shall be binding upon and inure.to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns, but no interest of the purchasers shall be assigned, 6. subcontracted or oth, rise transferred, voluntarily involuntarily, without the prior written consent of the seller. The seller shall not unreasonably withhold such consent. Consent by seller to one transfer shall not constitute consent to other transfers or waiver of this section. Any attempted assignment in violation of this provision shall be void and no effect with respect to seller. Purchaser and any other person at any time obligated for the performance of the terms of this contract hereby waive notice of and consent to any and all extensions and modifications of this contract, granted by seller at the request of any person now or hereafter obligated on this contract and agree that any such extenstions or modifications will not in any way release, discharge, or otherwise affect the liability of any person at any time obligated hereunder. Prior Agreements 12. This document is the entire, final and complete agreement of the _ parties pertaining to the sale and purchase of the property, and supersedes and replaces all :written and oral agreements heretofore made or existing by and between the parties of their representatives insofar as the property is concerned. Number, Gender and Captions 13. As used herein the singular shall include the plural and the plural the singular. The masculine and neuter shall each include the masculine, feminine and neuter, as the context requires. All cations used herein are intended solely for convenience of reference and shall in no way limit any of the provisions of this contract. Existing Encumbrances 14. There currently exists a lien on the described property in the form of a trust deed from the seller to Benjamin Franklin Savings & Lean Association, as beneficiary, dated May 2, 1978, recorded October 24, 1978, as recorder's fee number 78-46728, fil records, Washington County, Oregon, in the sum. of 7. One Million Five H, .dred Thousand Dollars and no, ,0 ($1, 500, 000. 00) Dollars. The seller shall comply with all the terms and conditions of said trust deed, including the payment of all sums due. thereunder. In the event the seller shall default under the terms and conditions of said trust deed, then the purchaser hereunder may cure such default and any payment made by the purchaser shall be considered as performance to such extent under the terms and provisions of this contract and seller shall be estopped from claiming a default against purchaser to the extent of any payments made under the provisions of this paragraph to cure any default under said promissory note and trust deed. Such trust deed provides for lot release provisions and seller shall cause the lien of such trust deed to be released from any lot that buyer requests released under this contract. IN WIT1'ESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this contract to be executed in duplicate as of the day and .year first above written. SELLER: A�MART DEVELOPt•IE\T, LTD. , an Oregon By: LUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO . , the General 8�-- %�` _ 7 Partner By � �__ 77"-`r �.- PURCHASER SELU PROPERTIES, a general partnership a rtne r By: 1 (Partner 8. EXHIBIT A AMART SUMMERLAKE IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Lots 1 through 34 Lots 36 through 103 Lots 106 and 107 Lots 110 and 111 Lots 114 and 115 ## 00(419- 1 AMART DEVELOPMENT. LTD. AMART DEVELOP! T, LTD. ,< S%V Scholia Ferry Rd. to SW.130th. Dcaver•on SIV S^.holly Ferry Rd uSit' 130th, Beaverton SUMMER LAKE RE. SU.%t\IER LAKE P E. LOT A�tnt•�;T t 1.OT A`toll`T 61 16,300 11,000 62 16,300 1 63 16,300 2 12.200 64 16, 300 3 12.200 65 16, 300 4 12,200 66 19,500 5 12,200 G7 21, 100 6 12,200 69 21. 100 7 12.200 69 2:, 100 8 12,200 70 21. 100 9 12,200 71 22,000 10 12,200 72 22.000 12,200 11 73 22,000 12 12.200 74 22,000 13 12.200 75 22,000 14 12,200 76 2:,000 15 12,200 77 23.600 16 12,200 79 22,o0o 17 12.200 79 22.ODO 13 12,200 HO 22,000 11) 12,200 N1 19.500 20 12,200 ! Y2 19.Soo 21 12.'_00 83 19. 500 22 12.200 2 R4 19,500 3 12.200 85 16,300 24 12,200 86 12,200 25 16.300 87 12,200_ 26 16.300 83 12,200 27 16.300 89 1' 200 28 16,300 29 l(..300 90 32. 200 30 _ 1.1.600 I 91 92 12,200 31 14.600 91 12.20o 32 14.600 94 12.200 33 16.300 95 1' 200 34 15.500 96 12.200 36 16.300 q7 12.2!:o 37 16.300 911 12,200 38 16.300 99 12,2`;0 39 16,300 100 12,2110 40 16,300 101 12,200 41 16.300 4 102 12.200 2 16,300 .1 Y6,300 03 12,200 43 44 13.500 106 12.200 4 107 12,200 5 16,300 46 16.300 110 1 , OO 17,900 III Iz.zoO 47 _ 114 12,200 48 11,900 115 12.200 49 17.900 50 17,900 .1 16 12.200 51 17.900 117 12...00 52 17.900 I is 53 17.900 119 12.200 54 ]7.900 120 12.200 t 17,700 121 12.200 56 17,900 122"' 12,200 57 17,SCO -121 12.200 58 17,700 12.1 12.200 59 16.30.0 125 12.200 60 1 S.500. i SUMMER LAKE RE. LOT AMOTI\T a 126 12,200 127 12.200 y _ J 128 12.200 J� I - 129 12.200 130 12,200 131 12.200 l32 12.200 ' 133 12,200 . - 134 12.290 _ 135 11.000 EXHIBIT B - Page 2 PURCHASE PRICE OF SUMMER LAKE PHASE IA LOTS Lot Tvoe Sale Price Lot ..4 Type Sale Price I ' 1 SFA 14,000 61 SFD 22, 500 2 " 14,700 62 25,600 3 " 14,700 63 " 25, 600 I 4 " 14, 700 .64 " 25,600 5 14,700 65 25,600 6 " 14,700 66 " 30,800 7 " 14,700 67 " 34,000 8 " 14,700 68 " 34,000 9 " 14, 700 69 " 34,000 10 14,000 70 " 34,000 11 " 15,700 71 35,000 12 " 15, 100 72 " 35.000 13 " 15,700 73 " 35,000 14 " 15,700 74 " 35,000 15 " 15,700 75 " 35.000 16 " 15,700 76 35.000 17 " 15,700 77 " 37, 100 18 " 15,700 78 " 36,000 19 15, 700 79 35.000 20 " 15,700 80 " 30,800 21 " 15,700 81 25,600 22 " 15, 700 82 " 25,600 23 15,700 83 25,600 - 24 15, 700 84 25,600 25 SFD 21, 500 85 22, 500 26 " 21,500 86 SFA 15, 100 t 27 " 21,500 87 15, 700 28 21,500 88 15. 700 29 " 21, 500 89 15, 700 30 " 18.900 90 15, 700 31 " 18, 900 91 " 15. 700 32 21, 500 92 " 15. 700 33 " 22, 500 93 " 15. 700 34 " 20, 900 94 " 15, 100 36 " 21, 500 95 15. 100 37 " 21. 500 96 " 15. 100 38 " 21, 500 97 " 15, 100 39 " 21, 500 98 " 15, 100 40 " 21, 500 99 " 15, 100 41 " 21, 500 100 " 15. 100 42 " 21. 500 101 " 15. 700 43 " 21, 500 102 " 15.700 44 " 20, 900 103 " 15, 100 45 " 22, 500 106 " 15, 700 46 " 22, 500 107 " 15. 700 47 " 24, 500 110 " 15, 100 48 " 23, 500 111 15.700 49 " 23, 500 114 " 15. 100 50 " 23, 500 115 15, 100 51 " 23, 500 52 " 23,500 53 " 23, 500 54 " 23,500 55 " 23, 500 56 " 23,500 57 " 23, 500 58 22, 500 59 " 22.500 60 " 21, 500 mom EXHIBIT C STATUTORY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED Amara Development, Ltd. , an Oregon corporation, Grantor, conveys and specially warrants to SELU Properties, a general partnership, the following described real property free of encumbrances created or suffered by the Grantor except as specifically set forth herein. LOT AMART SUNIMERLAKE, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, SUBJECT TO: Non-access strips and utility easement for sanitary sewer, storm drain and water purposes as shown on the recorded Plat. This deed is given in fulfillment of a Contract for the purchase of Real Estate dated recorded in Washington County, Oregon. The true consideration for this conveyance is the sum of Dated this day of 19 AMART DEVELOPMENT, LTD. , an Oregon corporation By; President By; Secretary STATE OF OREGON ) )ss County of Multnomah ) On the date appearing above personally appeared and , who, being duly sowrn, each for himself and not one for the other, did day that the former is the President and that the latter is the Secretary of Amart Development, Ltd. , an Oregon Corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors; and each of them acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for Oregon Comm, expires: SECOND AMENDMENT OF REAL ESTATE CONTRACT OF SALE This amendment to Real Estate Contract of Sale is made and entered into this 25th day of June 1982, by and between AMPRT DEVELOPMENT , LTD . , an Oregon Corporation, ("Seller") and SELU PROPERTIES , an Oregon General Partnership, ("Buyer" ) which amends that certain Real Estate Contract of Sale dated the 25th day of June 1980 , which contract was subsequently amender? on December 22, 1981 . Paragraph lb is amended as follows: Whereas sufficient payments have not been made to amortize the obligation to the agreed balance as of June 25 , 1982, the parties hereby agree that the amount of pri::cipal due , $937 ,285.98 , on June 25 , 1982 will be extended to June 25 , 1983. Accrued interest due on June 25 , 1982 will be added to the principal amount. No other provi— sions of the original contract will be modified. AMART DEVELOPMENT , LTD. SELU PROPERTIES By LUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO. , A General Partnership the - P tner BY: BY: J Morrison, Treasurer Art h r A. Lutz, P tier niel R ' '5egel ,�P�rtner ( AMENDMENT OF REAL ESTATE CONTRACT OF SALE This amendment is made as of this 22nd day of December , 1981 by AMART DEVELOPMENT LTD . , an Oregon Corporation , and SELU PROPER- TIES , a general partnership , to a real estate contract of purchase between the above parties dated June 25 , 1980. Paragraph 1b to the original contract dated June 25 , 1980 provided for the payment of principal and interest on June 25 , 1981 . Whereas sufficient payments have not been made to amortize the obligation to the agreed balance as of June 25 , 1981 the parties hereby agree that the amount of principal due , $351 , 748 . 64 on June 25 , 1981 will be extended and payable on June 25 , 1982. Accrued interest due on June 25 , 1981 will be added to the principal amount. No other provisions of the original agreement will be modified by this amendment. AMART DEVELOPMENT , LTD . SELU PROPERTIES , by LUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO . , a General Partnership _ the G al 4ner ._ 1 ( 'IYeasurer VC Part e r (r i , Is f t r f I i i STATE OF OREGON ) ss County of Multnomah ) On the day and month and year above written personally appeared Bruce J. Morrison and E . D. Perry who , being duly sworn, each for himself-andhimself-and not one for -EFe other, did say that the former is the Treasurer and that the latter is the Vice President of Lutz Development Co . , the General Partner of Amart Development, Ltd. , and said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors ; and each of them acknowledged said instrument to be its volun- tary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public tor GLkeg,6n Comm. expires STATE OF OREGON ) ss County of Multnomah ) On the day and month and year above written personally appeared Arthur A. Lutz and Daniel R. Se el known to me personally as the partners of SELU Properties , a general partnership, who executed the with- in and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they signed the said instrument as their voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposed therein mentioned. Before me : Notary Public for Oreg n 1 Comm. expires : /) -/L t t d -- •• Pr�;mwm $ 3 81 . 0 0 r. cit. P U Cep 36 c+ton, ;, S C 3. 7075 Phone (;;u„) v4:,-5u46 PIONEER NATIONAL. TITLE INSURANCE ® Thep f, ATtCOR COMPANY • ®l' Iy� • itle Insurance PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, hereinafter called the Company, for a valuable consideration paid for this policy of title insurance, the number, date, and amount of which are shown in Schedule A, does hereby insure the parties named as Insured in Schedule A, the heirs, devisees, personal representatives of such insured, or if a corporation, its successors by dissolution, merger or consolidation, against direct loss or damage not exceeding the amount stated in Schedule A. together with costs, attorneys* fees and expenses which the Company may be obligated to pay as provided in the Conditions and Stipulations hereof, which the Insured shall sustain by reason of: Title to the land described in Schedule A being vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as herein stated. or Unmarketability, at the date hereof, of the title to said land of any vestee named herein, unless such un - marketability exists because of defects, liens, encumbrances, or other matters shown or referred to in Schedule B; or Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date hereof, not shown or referred to in Schedule B, or excluded from coverage in the Schedule of Exclusions from Coverage; or Any defect in the execution of any mortgage or deed of trust shown in Schedule B securing an indebtedness, the owner of which is insured by this policy, but only insofar as such defect affects the lien or charge of such mortgage or deed of trust upon said land; or Priority, at the date hereof, over any such mortgage or deed of trust, of any lien or encumbrance upon said land, except as shown in Schedule B such mortgage or deed of trust being shown in the order of its priority, s� all subject, however, to the Schedule of Exclusions from Coverage and the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed, which, together with Schedules A and B are hereby made a part of this policy. This policy shall not be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating officer of the Company. 'ion r National Title Insurance ompany by esident Attest: Liu Countersigned: Secretary Vahaatmg Signatory TO 1529 PNTf OR (8-79) Rating Bweau for Title ]nsL'e-:= :T-oanies in Oregon Standard Coverage PoLcy KJAW CAT. NO. NN00306 _ S C H E D U L E A Amount $ 96,400.00 Date September 8, 1981 At 8:00 A.M. Premium $ 381.00 INSURED -----SELU PROPERTIES (an assumed business name for ARTHUR A. LUTZ & DANIEL R. SEGEL) and WILLIAM T. VAUGHAN doing business as TRADEMARK PLAZA----- The estate or interest referred to herein is, at the date hereof, vested in -----TRADEMARK HOMES, INC. , an Oregon corporation The land referred to in this policy is described as Lot 23, AMART SUMMER LAKE, Wo�;hington County, Oregon----------- i i r 4 E i E i i F Page 1 of Policy No. 34-A-107999 IMM i Standard Coverage Policy SCHEDULE A--Continued The estate or interes` in the land described in this schedule is : Fee S C H E D U L E B This policy does not insure against loss or damage, nor against costs, attorney' s fees or expenses, any or all of which arise by reason of the matters shown or referred to in this Schedule except to the extent that the owner of any mortgage or deed of trust is expressly insured on page 1 of this policy. 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2 . Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the pLiblic records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3 . Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records; unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers, including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County, a municipal corporation. 6. Agreement for Temporary Water Connection, including the terms and provisions thereof, Between: Herbert A. Stark, Ruth J. Stark and Tigard Water District Recorded: December 24, 1975 Book: 1060 Page: 469 Records of Washington County, Oregon. For: Waiver of remonstrance 7. An easement, as shown on the recorded Plat, Filed by: Amart Development, Ltd. , an Oregon limited partnership Recorded: August 29, 1979 Book: 47 Page: 37-38 Plat Records of Washington County, Oregon. Affects: Ten feet along all front and rear lot lines For: Utilities Page 2 of Policy No. 34-A-107999 8. An easement, as shown on the recorded Plat, Filed by: Amart Development, Ltd. , an Oregon limited partnership Recorded: August 29, 1979 Book: 47 Page: 37-38 Plat Records of Washington County, Oregon. Affects: Five feet along the North lot line For: Construction and maintenance of utilities 9. Covenants, conditions and restrictions, including the terms and provisions thereof, and the right to levy certain charges and assessments against the subject property, contained in Declaration, Filed by: Amart Development, Ltd. , an Oregon limited partnership Dated: December 10, 1979 Recorded: December 10, 1979 Fee No. : 79059791 Records of Washington County, Oregon. 10. Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, given to secure a note, Amount: $77, 600.00 Executed by: Trademark Homes, Inc. , an Oregon corporation Trustee: Pioneer National Title Insurance Service Beneficiary: State Savings and Loan Association, a corporation Dated: August 13, 1981 Recorded: September 3, 1981 Fee No. : 81-30178 Records of Washington County, Oregon. 11. Contract of Sale, including the terms and provisions thereof, Vendor: Trademark Homes, Inc. Vendee: SELU Properties (an assumed business name for Arthur A. Lutz and Daniel R. Segel) and William T. Vaughan doing business as Trademark Plaza Dated: August 31, 1981 Recorded: September 4, 1981 Fee No. : 81030258 Records of Washington County, Oregon. --------------------------- r Page 3 of Policy No. 34-A-107999 s �s OWNER'S INFLATION PROTECTION INDORSEMENT ATTACHED TO POLICY NO. 34—A-107999 ISSUED BY �f Pioneer National Title insurance Company The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property, valuation and intending to provide additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy, hereby modifies said Policy, as follows: 1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the amount of insurance provided by said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified. 2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of this Indorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to which this Indorsement is attached, and on each succeeding January 1. 3. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by increasing the maximum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Indorsement) by the same percentage, if any, by which the United States Department of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1967) for the month of September immediately preceding exceeds the highest Index number for the month of September in any previous year which is subsequent to Date of Policy; provided, however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of-said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said Policy which, under the terms of the Conditions and Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost Index. 4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of insurance in force shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which the insured claimant first learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first occur. Nothing herein_ contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said Policy. This indorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company By < kRESIDENT Attest: SECRETARY RATING BUREAU FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN OREGON The sketch below is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the Company assumes no liability for variations, if any, :n dimensions and location ascertained by actual survey. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company + A TICOR COMPANY 127 a3 1 3400 8200 '8100 . 124 '. o� ,o7.oe 8� 128 f 125 1 � V.7700 ao. 3500 s S7 33.e3 n ,02.r� 4 ,� "� +n9v 42 4 E 7 .Pi 1 600 r a }?}00 000 7200 7300N X00 120,E .� 82 TS n a 40 n .. 0 7400 •T rRA - N 4 1,17 ,x�T p Iro " 7500 114 49 it30 .40srz Is _ ratio rte. A .6900 r= 1 13�Ia6• 10V4&3r dies iLs - G to ,a, 6800fie? �' a� 3900 �-` 112 406600 jdP� �* 4000 ' 110 14' ��y 'O 41It 00 i7..7�10 r7cz Sp.hRd 'O ♦� 45 i, 4200 16 +. c`n� b19.4120 � 4300 ♦ _� f 5400 5500 ►9' o o -100` � b300 107''0 9 5`$00 $6200 ` 4500 Iw.76 to 106 ` S 006 - L,, �o fi�4St pro e1. 4600 ,. .. 5800 r.r6000 6100 Z0" 1 ,o e'►4i� ~ Ito 4700 ti ; .X00 -104 105 .- +os 21 z � 0 E..O o S �o 'Nd 9za, 103 4fl 1—. _ lip- 1d6ie22 ' r 2019 w-L� HAWKS BEARDe STREET 9 4900 oee.s 23 SEE MAP I S 1 350A !Condition-, and S1,11u1Z�t,nns Cont n+u,+d anri Ciro l--Ir t I"o", ?eve*ee S-de v, ",!-v v Fd-r Such staiemcni shall have fern turmshed. aiid n,: it-, -1 r.• an tin p,oVk•ment subsequent IO tilt' date Of this pOIICy. and o:,lY shall be had by the Insured node, th,s pc.!,cti unless : . t+„^ n-, that event. the Insured becornes ci coinsurer to the extent here- Shall be comn.enced thereon within five years rine, ex{,:r,r:, � lter set forth- If the cost of the improvement exceeds twenty of Said thirty day perlud. Failure 10 furnish s,,.-h state,•+«• : per centun, 01 the amount of this polcy. such proportion only of loss or damageor tc, commence Such actin,+ with,•, til«" Tillie a,ty partial loss established shall be borne by the Company as hereinbefore specif,ett. stall he a con; lus,ve bar ag-I r l ,+ 1• one hundred twenty per centum of the amount of this policy bears teriance by the insured of any action undE:r this puri=v. to the Su^l of the amount of this policy and the amount expended for the improvement. The foregoing provisions shall not apply to Compromise Claims costs and attorneys' fees incurred by the Company ,n prosecuting 5. Option to Pay. Settle or Cos•"ttl«• cit "" or providing for the defense of actions or proceedings in behalf The Company shatl have the o mpr to pay ,+r `.""{ mise for of ,n the name Of the Insure0f any C1,11111 it+shred nya+nf,t of the Insured pursuant to the terms of this policy or to costs ,m- pay the full amount of this poky. Ill. ,n ccisc• loss ,-, posed on the Insured rri such actions or proceedings. and shall or to apply only to that portion of losses v.hich exceed in the aggre- claimed under this policy by the owner of the ,r:,HPt_+tedness Se- gate ten icer cent of the face Of the p01'Cy. Provided. however. cured by a mortgage Ccvered by this policy. the Com{kClny shall That the foregoing coinsurance provisions shall not apply to any have the Option to purchase said indehtedness. sack purer; se, loss arising out of a hen or encumbrance for a liquidated amount payment or tender of riayment of the fu'; amount of this policy. .vh,ch existed cm the date of this policy and was not shown ,n together with all costs. attorneys fe;s and expenses ruiner; Schedtile S. and provided further such Coinsurance provisions the Company is obi,gated hereunder to payshall tri-n:n3te all Shall not appiv to any loss if, at the time of the occurrence of liability of the Company hereunder. In the event. after notice of Such loss til. .en value of the prerniseS. as se improved, does claim has been given to the Company by the Insured, the Com- riot exceed c hundred twenty per centum of the amount of this pang offers to {AirChaSe said indebtedness, the owner of such policy. indebtedness shall transfer arid assign Said indebtedness and the mortgage securing the Same to the Company upon payment (bi If the land described or referred to m Schedule A is divisible of the purchase price. into separate and noncontiguous parcels, or if contiguous and such parcels are not used as one single site. and a loss is es- 6. Payment of Loss tablished affecting one or more of said parcels but not all, the (al The Ilab,1ity of the Company under this policy s`,all in no ioss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the case exceed. in all, the actual loss of the Insured and costs face amount of the policy was divided pro rata as to the value on and ai- :rneys fees which the Company may be obligated here- the date of this policy of each separate independent parcel to the under to pay. whole. exclusive of any improvements made Subsequent to the (b) The Company will pay. in addition to any loss insured date of this policy. unless a liability or value has otherwise been against by this policy" all cost imposed upon the Insured in Ii agreed upon as to each Stich parcel by the Company and the In- tigation carried on by the Company for the Insured, and all costs sured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an and attorneys' fees in litigation carried on by the Insured with express statement herein or by an endorsement attached hereto. the written authorization of the Company. (c) No claim for damages shall arise or be maintainable under 9. Subrogation upon Payment or Settlement this policy (1) if the Company, after having received notice of Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under this pol- an alleged defect, lien or encumbrance not excepted or excluded icy. all right of subrogation shall vest ,n the Company unaffected herein removes such defect, lien or encumbrance within a reason- by any act of the Insured. and,rt shall be subrogated to and be en- able time after receipt of such notice. or (2) for liability volun- titled to all rights and remedies which the Insured would have had tarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit with- against any person or property in respect to such claim had this out written consent of the Company, or (3) in the event the title policy not been issued. If the payment does not cover the loss of is refected as unmarketable because of a defect, lien or e^cum- the insured. the Company shall be subrogated to such rights and brance not excepted or excluded ,n this policy. until there has remedies in the proportion which said payment bears to the amount been a final determination by a court of competent )ur,sd-ct,on of said loss. If loss should result from any act of the Insured. sustaining such rejection. Suchact shall not void this policy. but the Company, in that (d) All payments under this policy. except payments made for event. shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured costs. attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount against hereunder which Shall exceed the amount. if any. lost to of the insurance pro tanto and no payment shall be made wail- the Company by reason of the impairment of the right of subroga- out producing this policy for endorsement of such payment un- t,on. The Insured. if requested by the Company. shall transfer to less the policy be lost or destroyed. in which case proof of the Company all rights and remedies against any person or pro- such loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction perty necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation, and of the Company. provided, however. ,f the owner of an indebted- shall permit the Company to use the name of the Insured in any ness secured by a mortgage shown in Schedule B is an Insured transaction or litigation involving such rights or remedies. herein then such payments shall not reduce pro tanto the amount If the Insured is the owner of the Indebtedness secured by a mort- of the insurance afforded hereunder as to such Insured, except gage covered by this policy. Such !nsured may release or substi- to the extent that such payments reduce the amount of the in- tote the personal liability of any debtor or guarantor, or extend debtedness secured by such mortgage. Payment in full by any or otherwise modify the terms of payment. or release a portion person or voluntary satisfaction or release by the Insured of a of the estate or interest from the lien of the mortgage. or release mortgage covered by this policy shall terminate all liability of any collateral security for the indebtedness, provided such act the Company to the ,n.ured owner of the indebtedness secured does not result ,n any loss of priority of the lien of the mortgage. by such mortgage, except as provided ,n paragraph 2 hereof. (e) When liability has been definitely fixed ,n accordance with 10. Policy Entire Contract the conditions of this policy the loss or damage shall be lay- Any action or actions Or rights of action that the Insured may able within thirty days thereafter. have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status 7. Liability Noncumulative of the lien of the mortgage covered by this policy or the title of It is expressly understood that the amount of this policy ,s re- the estate or interest insured herein must be based on the pro- duced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy In- visions of this policy. No provision or condition of this policy Suring the validity or priority of any mortgage shown or referred can be waived or changed except by writing endorsed hereon or to in Schedule B hereof or any mortgage hereafter executed by attached hereto signed by the President, a Vice President, the the Insured which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest Secretary. an Assistant Secretary or other validating officer described or referred to in Schedule A. and the amount so p Girl of the Company. shall be deemed a payment to the insured under this policy. The provisions of this paragraph numbered 7 shall not apply to an Insured owner of an indebtedness secured by a mortgage shown 11- Notices,Where Sent in Schedule B unless such Insured acquires title to said estate All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in or interest in satisfaction of said indebtedness or any part writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number thereof. of this policy and shall be addressed to it at the office which issued this policy or to its Home Office,Claims Department,6300 Wilshire 8.Coinsurance and Apportionment Boulevard,P.O. Box 92792, Los Angeles,California 90009. / (a) In the event that a partial loss occurs after the Insured makes l ✓/ 0 I a 3 C o 1 � L •i jet �=, 1 �� a �_` t 1 = � 9 •' �� 1. -� _ 1 � •�'\`-,_� :moi n��,�/ 1 ogsos 1 `\. IL Z � /Z �� i 1. `� ill.c i',�� ;�'.`.1.. I .1 frC y''� ,. `•� -,t �, 04 r �./' :� '!i^'ys .�� ♦ , 1 � O.c� 9/ r4,9'Ji .9 ;v tt v C3� / If ,yK 94 S ,' �► s � ten + � ` \ °..�`� Sr S ♦ 1 ,�ah1N �Q�+ 11 _ zo ll s=% r A'1.!•Ir .c�,�-1` ,, !_`!N��.N��;'.otT: _,oC` `"'.<--�� x•11 ` ` \ vrr 46 72 63 a= rry ♦1 j4 �, �\ 7 '� ± ` �.ris7 } �W`1 iV �� i• -. � - _ o L oG+,A✓Y!4!_ 1 ` ••'` ' r =, "� 1 _ 'Mme`� 1 ' 9 : I •[ l ==;; I j def 4 • �; I ..:- ;" _� I ; i t ,� � _ ��{ to I J- 4 it , TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY There were approximately 3 meetings held by the Chamber of Commerce from *-. rch 1980 to June 1980. Meeting dates from June 1980 to present are as follows: June 14, 1980 April 28, 1982 August 17, 1980 May 12, 1982 August 20, 1980 May 26, 1982 September 9, 1980 June 9, 1982 January 28, 1981 July 7, 1982 February 11, 1981 August 11, 1982 February 25, 1981 September 22, 1982 April 22, 1981 October 13, 1982 May 14, 1981 November 10, 1982 August 13, 1981 December 1, 1982 September 22, 1981 December 20, 1982 October 27, 1981 January 13, 1983 November 3, 1981 February 14, 1983 November 17, 1981 December 15, 1981 The following Resolutions and Ordinances were passed regarding TURA. June 9, 1980 - Resolution 80-46 regarding Downtown Tigard Committee. October 13, 1980 - Resolution 80-90 regarding supporting application for Federal Assistance for Development of Downtown Revitalization Plan. November 10, 1980 - Resolution 80-99 regarding Federal Funds of $20,000 through Washiagton County Committee Development Block Grant Program. April 27, 1981 - Resolution 81-42 amending 80-46 which created Downtown Tigard Committee. This resolution names exact members. October 12, 1981 - Ordinance 81-91 establishing the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency by adding New Title, Title 19, to TMC. September 28, 1981 - Resolution 81-106 furthering changing the Downtown Committee with posting Consultant Selection duties and responsibilities. December. 21, 1981 - Ordinance 81-124 approving the Downtown Tigard Revitalization Plan under ORS 457.095 and providing for an Advisory Election. August 16, 1982 - Resolution 82-93 regarding Special Advisory Election/Tax Increment Financing for Funding. Ck�c o gy iv a$ p, v'a . E3� � a � 6 a 0.:7Rao •��U � �� t�cGj'�o c"o,, a O p23p > a °i TAS �. �Mo 3iyQo o � SB �geo6 �, X3 °4' ® �, f3 � � g�--o o. 6 � �,n yea a�_a �. .... >, c7 0 o-' o�= � ►-,' gs)go �9r• iw 8 $ �C� �v � �= i g I E$ °r� � �3�3"' '3,� c pa °v " 3 -� � ?gu' ami -aU c��a d � `v^, _` g.2� m� o1f S4 0 EaJ 0T2-- d � �� a 0' = —,>, � o `� -f`�� a"oc� 3ra $ 3 u Q y'r.. x '—' CL 0 >� G o-a C6 p cs:y n �� 3 a v oc a °' o as .M a n�i G� .� cu QQ co a� o r a 3 o $ c 8 _ 4.v o�Q:o s� k��+a c`� caax G$�v�c,,°II In c ',� 6 • I0 =3 W fO„ y O C O d y.� A V U.G 6� pOp p, .�.. a0 p►• t� 0 .~°'12a A oL so o v a.r .dax 6.>.. $ o I c°� Nwv w 491 ce cr E • i i.7 � f y, r� g fL7 O > m cm lid co o E t Cd II a g cc 4 Q tai s c • R ill 1` � c O VIII EAW'. • s 1.. o tC C x _ a .. .. ��f.d♦ • .. • Flet.�pY>• . . ••;� '�'' � L DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503} 539-2900 23, 1983 1 i!l r rrL� -iz C GlL .' vJ'� Lo _C.`- r�^r 7 ='l: :1 7/IJ'�3� C�'Z!' .�' J/LG C I2 X5/'.2 �C%L3 p-cl IG ` l7 �.` U�- `J.e CL2.2 <wC 'Z.-LC�tt!!2�' to /"aa [2G/Lf .O'-,- CI..A-`�L�C Cl'.4! CL,� .!JTU•.C.-u:: n„F'i�C7/Lw c:•��ru--�-.�� c�ckiL;,��s v v :Iz .�rJ�r.�:e. %n..�.a .�.s t• 72 ! LC!i t1CL G ?.'JJ�G2 1 . I iLC .6u1?-v'lJolt1 ScrJL 1.�Ld enc. )1 c`' � e ✓�� d?L:Gr••CZ".G r''.1Lrii��,U•ZV-ii�,'a"-r2 -lsi��i� ��Z� •�.? I u L� it i r .pn ��r ':fl` r� i.. 1-�cr-t%, rS � ... � p` �•y rl �c.'h.�•�:3' c�v.,r1 Fzzc;,' i cfz zx7 C.. �P1 ?C'1Lti �CL IT L <SILC7 Li,--r 'T'r Ca �r r. 2eGe[tl :' i fa?J�elr, t1 .' , nrsU/z, �LCJn j ?3dlhflr •` ./S LeILJL?_�, tLCJL Sat °us, C?COTL2 ur-th .�.P/.X1� �S./1__Jt1?.rt -iJ7.Ci.� .'�3 .:11� 2!�^.�;�7�–O•-'��-LI �. .✓tCL:, [tI-!�w •.:-r' , uztiLG .A:r.'lUJt1 C..`; LU1�-L(72 G�2S%i?LLG� 1L ,2 tg rinnzn2tZarz 7668 d ci,7-ej-, s, itc tr r:. cor�;t o,cfu�ar ,n. ' cl 3errs�tlzerz� o° ,''.etJ,�tLe 3•—377-87 J.e t?6fa .t. at .i h ez e dactwzAaf tis Cc czad rem_ a-2 v-,,l 74;--32 Fuzc-1_il -z, ?.iFi cr..es and ✓7n?Cerzerz�_t,-arz c-iso r-a,- c' C-ttj a Tina n,-co'" �L' ,�' i�y�.�/ /_�>.r�.:'�.I Wit- ✓'� - C�'ii�1 Ge t� zrze L. �1e C, %en sarzcz�t t e�tct%rze L.7n-,-- 2a-L' - ll use-%n�� ,,,ant- i 0 i ks 9 i i E } / i milli,iiiiij, N� '2' -7172Z3 FEE3 041 1 83 D CITY OF TIGARD --2 3j PLANNING DEPT- '7-7Z-Z,,3 EPT.t7zz3 -et fz- 17 � � 02-23 -83 � • nc- i mord Of �UrVP. !� (°1ap4}0'0'!°f'+'1'D'I° '('i'[Ip SoiR+I aPiai'3 ta)an 1M4!-Pi(i�t alt loss � 1111111111111 j I I a7i7a(t a €�a rir aea I arariraalaaaiaaHla r ai° a a ia ala1o1aaa,aayr1ala9aiHea � y NOTE: IF THIS MICRDFIUAED . _ O _ 0 _....-. 12' DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN _- THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO . THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL - - - DRAWING. -- j- o¢—sz -- —9-- s m e z ate- +aalual9uaa�uu6uaSaaH::74MA." CHuadoir)natip��u _ t�lut�lna 21990 a RECORD OF SUV E Y FC"I .r I_ir�� fur r;Fnl _ - WAY i_r")(-�1T1i)N :-�.1r,''1 t'! � 944,4 alnd i/ e e J��Ce e ON A TRALT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE �.E '/-i Uf SEC T=? ( ,I vi. AND TtIE N E. '/47F SEC L T �c>_f2• I :r� REGISTERED OREGON LAND SURVEYORS VJA• •�tIh1C.T;:�1 COUNTY, OREfaCt\{, I3EIK' % A PAF T L-)F I(a`377 S.W. CANYON DRIVE V�E-S7 F'02TlAtvr-` NEIGFfTS. LAKE OSWEGO OREGC)N 87034 DATE FEEfcI;AF',Y I, P� CR,>I'fEp 3Y � . PAFPE PHONE FIELD WORKCiY: H SONNST%lN � '�3`tl LEGEIJ O ® F4)UIJD MONUMENT AS E':T Aa NILARGE�M JT' E�_f_uE C• fIu MY MAft:-H ;y I?SI - -VEY Fi R GEknLOINE F_.AIL HNC O.T.E. fk-c.. - DITAI! A' 30 I dao a L 24";t.� I I F'ROFEGT,( LIIJE �.� FEtuLE G N.0W0024'E N.a9057E 1 50 0..0.7 131.00-h- . .._.�_ I o �r- Iz- Iti � SLALE I"=Lz7" SCALE BALL 13 BALL_ 59057.1, 74 q� {Jti f ti e •-�... i i ' Ino oc �Dt)I•fD� a �Z-"� �L' •' e �` c.I�; O S.aJt057"u;.' hg' I U1 N, `c a�Zv UUCEFL STREET 2 8'•, f04.3fl �. j g^f O N.45°OI'E i__ ._ -�. E /f14 oe BALL 0ti i ;e+R DETAILED FENCE uuE•—� �(-r\L, ,� N LOCATION IUFdit M,AT;O!.iSEE QV\' I EN:ac GEMEn7 CETAIL•q• I C D T E3 F^ENLEBA;; u. ' h, i I7 LJ Lo I � o fac 13 SS n I � � 11 • �J � ,_ Ing z� - �I�.o ,� � � I -LJ 5 V,1, ELM,H U RST '�-/TP_EET Clls u 0•=1051'W. �. 1 too.2S I'�+I_C7C_IL I SII II► Ile tirlria III�IIt III Ilt tic tlt tlt tit tit I t rit rjl III IIF I T III11111111 t t t I NOTE: IF I 1 j ( I 1 � ( � ( ( � RPT J ( � )• r i lRr] I ( I � I��I�ij1(Ill(titltltlllt(tie�ehl�lt�tielej1�rleltle�eltltle(IIIIItIIIPlrtr(Ht(FII �THIS MICROFILMED _- ..- I 2 3 4 _ rJ 6 7 8 9 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN I0' THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. - - --- os sz ez LZ az sz ez CE zz—ia oz sr-9�I - -LI 91 s1i 01 et it 11 of _6 e i _g. _ s t, c z 1— �nl�iNlhutiuuhutimduu�lNllan�Ntt11ry1�1�nIul�lWla�l!)tllttl� �+but lrtt n IsnIitWLrlltil�lihf(HIj�IIIIIIItldtlW(Ifit+WIIH J MARCH 1 ' 7 1 ackn - - (I March 31 , 1981 Portland Metro. 6ndry Comm. 320 Std Stark St., Suite 530 Portland, OR 97204`:' Dear Donald E. 6arlson: Please be advised that we have received and filed, as of March 30, 1931 , the followSng Fina Orders: 1690 - City of Cornelius 1678, 1679 - City of Fairview 1674, 1675, 1676 & 1691 - City of iiillsb0000 1689 - City of Milwaukie 1677 - City of Molalla 1680 -- City of Oregon City 1683 - City of Portland _ 1682 - City of Sherwood 1667, 1668, 1684,s'1685 City of Tigard 1664 - Clack. Co. Serv. Dist. No. 1 1672 - Wolf Creek Highway Dist. Our filing number is 81-53. Sincerely, 1 i Raymond A. Phelps, Jr. RAP:r12 cc: Clack., Mutt. , and !dash. Co. Clerks j E i - i i f - - MIN 1 10 ME POR'T'LAND Nrr_iROPOLIT.AN AREA LOCAL. GO,-ER�INT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 320 S. IV. Stark (#530) - Portland, Ore. 97204 - Tel: 229-5307 FINAL ORDER RE: BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL NO. 1668 - Annexation of territory to the City of Tigard. Proceedings on Proposal No. 1668 commenced upon receipt by the Boundary Commission of a resolution and property owner consents from the City of Tigard on December 5, 1980 requesting that certain property be annexed to the city. The resolution and property owner consents meet the require- ments for initiating a proposal set forth in ORS 199.490, particularly Section (2) . Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Conudssion published and posted notice of the public hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and conducted a public hearing on the proposal on February 12, 1981. The Commission also caused a study to be made on this proposal which considered economic, demographic and sociological trends and projections and physical develop- ment of the land. FINDINGS (See Findings in Exhibit "A" attached hereto) REASONS FOR DECISION (See Reasons for Decision on Exhibit "A attached hereto) ORDER On the basis of the Findings and Reasons for Decision listed above, the Boundary Commission approved BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL NO. 1668 on February 12, 1981. NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED THAT the territory described in Exhibit "B" and depicted on the attached maps, be annexed to the City'of Tigard as of the date of approval. POR'T'LAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY CONMISSION Date: �� ^; j By: .. Peter McDonald dice-Chairman r' AttesQ.',.:aAA�� Page 1 - FINAL ORDER EXFIBIT "A" Proposal No. 1668 FINDINGS On the basis of the public hearing and the study the Boundary Corrmussion found that: 1. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to the city and contains 23.79 acres, 28 single family residences, one church, and an estimated population of 70 persons and is evaluated at $1,548,500 2. The city desires annexation to extend the city limits to the Portland city limits, its urban planning area bowtdary, in order to regularize its boundary and plan for service provision within that hounda'ry. 3. 'Me Proposal creates an island of unincorporated lands surrounded by the city to the west. 4. the territory is developed with low density residential uses. - It is desig- nated Urban on the Metro and Washington County Framework flans. The city plans the area primarily for commercial Office-Park. S. The LCDC Goals have been considered and the proposal conforms with the statewide goals. The staff report is referenced for a goal-by- goal analysis 6. The territory is within the Metzger Water District which currently sciws the area. 11ie district has several lines in the area. Metzger Water District provides service for this area of the city and would not be adversely affected by annexation. The district has planned supply and storage adequate to serve the area. 7, 'Ilic terri tory i s within the botuidary of the Unified, Sewerage Agency. The agency does not have a collector system available in the area. Ik-vclopment of the industrial park will provide gravity service to Faruio Creek, crossing under 217 in the vicinity of Ilunziker St. the petitioners have also petitioned the city to form a Local Improve- ment District to obtain sewer service. The city anticipates forming the L.I.D. and planning the construction to serve all of the Tigard Triangle area. S. Fire protection is provided by Washington County/RFPD M1 which also provides faze service for the city. The district would not be adversely impacted by annexation. REASONS POR DECISION 1. The annexation is consistent with regional, county, and city plans and with LCDC goals. 2. Annexation will make available a full -range of urban services to the area which is part of the Tigard community. 3. Annexation is a step toward regularizing the city boundary and improv- ing planning implementation and police protection for the area. Page 2 - FIIMAL ORDER EXHIBIT 'B" Proposal No. 1668 Annexation CITY OF TIVARD A certain tract of land located in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West and Section 36 T1SR 1W Washington County,Oregon to wit; Beginning at a point North 10 06' West'30 feet from the Northwest coy- of Lot 25, Block 1 of West Portland heights, as platted; thence, along the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot 25 and the West line of said Lot 25 and Lots_ 24, 23, 22 and 21 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 21; thence, Westerly along the North line of Lot 6 said Block 1 to its North- west corner and the east line of S.W. 70th Avenue (platted German St.) thence, Southerly along the West line of said Lot 6, Block 1 and its Southerly extension to the Southwest corner of Lot 8, said Block 1; thence, Easterly along the South line of said Lot 8 and Lot 18 of said Block 1 to the Northwest corner of Lot 15, said Block 1; thence, Southerly along the West line of said Lot 15 and its southerly extension to the Northwest corner of Lot 7, lock 10 said West Portland Heights Addition as platted and the South line of S.W. Baylor Street (platted Second Street) ; thence, Easterly along the South line of S.W. Baylor Street and its extension across S-W. 69th Avenue (platted Washington Street) , a distance of 235 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 9 said West Portland Heights Addition as platted; thence, Southerly along a line half way between the East and West lines of said Block 9 to the Southerly line thereof and the Southwest corner of Lot 23, said Block 9 and the North line of S.W. Clinton Street (platted Third Street); thence, Westerly along the North line of said S.W. Clinton Street, a distance of 260 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot Z5 said Block 10; thence, Southerly along the Southerly extension of the West line of said Lot 25, Block 10 and the West line of Lot 5, Block 11 said West Portla,nd Heights Addition, as platted and its Southerly extension, a distance of 360 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 17 said Block 11; thence, Westerly along the North line of said Lot 17, Block 11 to its Northwest corner; thence, continuing Westerly along the extension of the North line of said lot 17, Block 11, a distance of 30 feet to the West line of said West Portland Heights Addition as platted; Page 3 - FINAL ORDER #1668 f` thence, Southerly along the West line of said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted, a distance of 1070 feet to a point on the West line of said West Portland Heighten Adaition, as platted, which point is Westerly 30 feet from the Southwest corner of Lot 18, Block 21 along the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 18; thence, Easterly along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 18, Block 21 and said Southline and its Easterly extension, a distance of 249 feet to the East line of said Block 21 and the Northeast corner of Lot 26, said Block 21; thence, Southerly along the East line of said Lot 26 and its Southerly extension, a distance of 160 feet to the Northeast corner of Block 30, said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Westerly along the North line of said Block 30 and its Westerly extension, a distance of 249 feet to a point on the West line of said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted, said point being 30 feet Westerly along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Block 30; thence, Southerly along the West line of said Addition, as platted, a distance of 610 feet to a point which is Westerly 30 feet from the North- west corner of Lot 9, Block 31, said West Portland Heights .Addition, as platted along the Westerly extension of the; North line of said Lot 9, Block 31; thence , Easterly along the Westerly extension of, and the North line of, said Lot 9 and Lot- 36 said Block 31 and the Easterly extension of the North line• of said Lot 36 to the centerline of S.W. 69th Avenue (platted Washington Street) and the existing city limit line; thence, Northerly along the existing city limit line 130 feet to the interne, of the centerline of S.W. 69th Avenue and S.W. Gonzaga Street 1platted Street) ; thence, Easterly along the center line of S.W. Gonzaga Street, a distance of 290 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S.W. Gonzaga Street and the Southerly extension of the West line of Block 28, said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Northerly along said last mentioned Southerly extension and the West line of Block 28, a distance of 350 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 9. said Block 28; thence, Easterly along the North line of Lots 9 and 36 and the Easterly extension of Lot 36 said Block 28, a distance of 230 feet to the center line of S.W. 67th Avenue (platted Lincoln Street) and the existing city limit line; Page 4 - FINAL ORDER #1668 thence, Northerly along, the cent:erLine oC S.W. 67th`A1e It e , as feet to the centerlines ofst ace of 130 S.W.S.W.S. , 1-rank:iii Street (p - e centerline of S.W- Franklin Straet , a distance of thence, westerly along th 260 feet to the centerline of S.W. 68th Avenue (platted Grant Street" ; thence, Northerly along the centerline of S.W. 66th Avenue, a distance of 130 feet, to a point Easterly 30 feet along the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 27, Block 22 [Jest Portland sleights Addition; thence, Westerly along the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 27 , the itio ScionhasinPlatted, to theand SouthwestBlock corner of saWet idsLotorLLand 18, andtlhts theJest Add line of said Block 22; thence, Northerly along the West line of said Block 22, a distance of 100 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 15 and Block 22; thence , Easterly a distance of 100 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lor. 15, Block 22; thcnse, :Jortherly along the East lines of Lots- 14, 13, 12, 11, lA, 9 and 4 of Block 22 to the Northeast corner of said Loth 4 and the Soutii tine of S.W- Elmhurst Street (platted Fifth Street) ; Lh.ence, Easterly along the South line of S.w. Elmhurst'SLr'CCt and Portland itsHeiEasterly extension to the Northwest corner of Block 23, said West Addition and the East line of S.W. 613th Avenue; thence, Southerly along; the East line of said S.W. 68th Avenue ;end the West line of Block 23said Weststortland iicigh of i Uf► f Lots d 9Asaid oplatted, a distance Block 23 thence. Easrl•rly along the North line of said Lot 9, a distance of 100 feet to the 56utheast corner of Lot 4 , said 3lork 23; thence, Northerly along the East line of said Lot 4 and its Northerly extension across S.w. Elmhurst Street to a point on the Soutii line of Block 18 said. [.est Portland Heights Addition, said point being; the Southeast corner of Lot 22, said Block 18 continuing Northerly along the East Line of said Lot 22 and its Northerly extension to the Northwest corner of l.ot 36 said Block 18; thence, Easterly along; the Northline of said Lot 36 and its Easterly extension to the Northwest corner of i.ot 9 Block 17 West Portland ileights Addition; continuing the No t along corner North line of said Lot 9 and its Easterly extension to the EasNortheast corner of Lot 36 said Block 17; Paf�e 5 - FINAL ORDER #1668 thence, Northerly along the West line of S.W. 66th Avenue (platted Garfield Streer ) a distance of 410 fe•e•L to it point oil the !,lust line of said S.W. 66th Avenue and the Northeast corner of Lot 32 Block 14 said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Westerly alons. the North line of said Lot 32, a distance of 100 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence, Southerly along the West line of Lot 32 and its Southerly extension to the Northeast corner of Lot 16, said Block 14 ; thence• , Westerly along; the ?forth line of said Lot 16 and its :Westerly extension a distance of 260 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 16 of Block 13; thence, Northeri.v 50 ;eet to tele Southeast corner of - Lot 13 , Block 13; thence, hastorla '100 feet to the :�outhPacr.- corner of Lot 32, said Block 13; an easterly extension of thence, Easterly 60 four alongA:lie South line of said Lot 32, Block 13 to the £astline of S.W. 67th Avenue and to the Northwest corner of Lot 14, Block 14, said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Northerly along the West line of said Brock 14 and its Northerly extension and ,the Wast line of Block 7, a distance of 635 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 9 said Block 7; tbe•nce , Easterly along the North lines of Lots 9 and 36 said Block 7, a distance of 200 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 36; thence , Northerly along; the East line of Lot 8 said Block 7 and its northerly extension to Lhe Southeast corner of Block 4 said Hest Portland Heights Addition; as platted thence, Westerly along the South line of said Block 4 and its Westerly extension to the Seutlieast corner of Black 3 said Wast Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence , Northerly along the East line of said Block 3 and its Northerly extension to the North line of the West Portland Heights Addition/ as platted, and the existing city limit line, thence. Westerly along the North line of the [Jest Portland Heights Addition, as platted, and the existing city liinit line to the POINT OF BEGLN?i1::G. n... 4 rr*rRt n»ern Proposal No. 8 L J 7 ,2,5 'R t �1 ---, - - S BEET" = ... .�'ao: �...N: .. acaoa- X00_2. .a ses = z 22 •- 1 —a cc _ I zo T 22J T? Sol IN' 7 T �• W Vie .. T_ ... �s W L a t.- i �..� n...x W •00 1 aoga,7 W 2 1.zoo' ' 300• i t 2 aoat 1 1 Z �W.c ; ' I I ti� 1 > 1c77 I I r• I Li W �$ S - i : W ! } 1 1 -1t 7Y ; Ti !• " I > �d� S.,a ,71 Q �•�•.O n'��13 w,S,•i ` 91 r1 n,R,:] ,• ,3• i1d Q •s,O•u, ,1 w.,S,a _1 •at�g _ W s Sw a 9AYLOR STREET W 'S 7 a.•1 3. j. 7!g j •: 3.f=EX 3a70 si 7 {!ba, ,ai` ! 1 9� b . s9 7! ffD �1 AREA TO BE ! t t !1.02 _ _ s— zw= x _ t _ u •oo_ _ •.00 c 371 10. c7 35 , „ a also �, �!� 1 9700 sa� ,� — — -- 34 —35 ,au90 is �!a_ �• 2300 foo ]?00 32 ' ,9 -\`8_ U •300 at Jo_ _ I 331 , - - - 3--1 = , — _ - , 3 •,00- - a, _ stt wa• PO 22W_ - 12.00 szA M=„- F,3- - - 3o I ,� - 11oo�p ' y ,s ,s , aax �,� p = 1 =�-" ; =` � m ";>_ ►-- �;s� yet _ to � r,o ! 30 73700 3C.^., +� i ,7� �3�0 2a 1 1,7 1 t 7o_T T T ri LL z soo ' I ( 1 ssoc J 27 25' ,a 2D 2�•�2a 2a b 2a• ,! 2C Zt-a 23 Z• $2C SW CLINTON •� m � � wSTREET G �� '•t"� a 1. 7.1t '' 31 •1 7: 1:7 2. 3' • Soo& 77 >• --9 , 2'3T•TTai rFV --a i 7cco I ! ?spa I � �.��I t ' I ! I ! •>,•04 ! 'ts 7:0 _ 7ag. f 0-.-aa_0GiW0 3a� s _ 1 3 00 0 3 _1120 -}-� ,o_ —a3 t; 3_71oo- rt 31, a � „- 1 - -x� erg Y =-•r - r ,a - - 12- - T 93 , 12 13900-33 j 7 r3C0 I _ _ 32 ,3 a6D0_S2, ' 300-i_ " ,a- �r , l ,•�i+c nr Y aaOC -v _A� ,•- - - a,- Vit- - - _3 14 •_ _ , 90� $ Lar• so �' :a_— 1 - �zs ssCO L7- - _ 21L_! ,7 _ asoo_2! ,7_- lsoo_a� `7• 00-_' - as 27 e9 y 7 ,D j7r la - 1 27 r T r r T a+OD 7 1 T'T T t a T 9i , 9� t . scao C3I� t i l I d � a t 3,ba,• t ..■ cao9..1 t r I " ; ! 1 I I •• 1 !! }s:,1.zi Zt, 23 a..a 29 211 2]24 23 z1y1.1 lt,l 213122,Z* al• `Is g� SW _ DARTMOUTH St See. PROPOSAL NO. 1668 CITY OF TIGARD FIG. 2d- LCa;�F+=4iaZ Pr®® i s a I No. 16 (S ° NE IA3 NE 1/4 SECTION 1 T2S RIW W.M. 2S c �f w&S%i%GtOti COur•TT OREGON SCALE 1'.100 �.7 C.� � � amsit = -_%1 __j - sw DARTMOUTH SZ - 100 ' '- 7"�Qd , •. 2790 � i. , .°o j . Itis 14 SIGaIle } tr j. �• � r-111. , 1 ; 1t f �a.lio u am-- 2enod ty - -- _T`l-_ _i j B6 M 1ISM- AREA TO BE ANNEXED � 'a- Y _ � '_- -'- te f � - 11dom 4% j a.bo-T- , e i s�io 1 �o i T lim• t 1 1 1 1 ° 1 1 1 I , ' • 1 1 . I ' I I � , i j �e o`s'trrtrtS,tetts't° thl3II'z.12?ts,tel8,tfl �•1_� / _t �. t _1..t _ a_.1_e ( , E.J •._�_ -L.�.►_r._ ,2io» 1M � • 39 we - 11 Q . S.W. ELMHURST T , I ° t � O ...�-�4. - - L / SSW 700_ •_ SOM. se sa°° - sono_ - -- - t r -u 373 - ,.- _ 3. _ CITY- --- CITY OF TIGARD32 00 _ . 30 s lea •_—� - - - -- - - r --_1,- fN'mlt/lt ?•,8.t. -• (°,.•1.4II•Ittlt st lte' f,lt ` N f o°o• S.W. FRA T-1 "Tr" ` 'rT r� �` ise+a. t xalt; opt � i , i ; I ' � I 1 �:i al• sl Itis ♦ 1 ';is� f;•; Lip 1 3e Ien,S- e^9 aimn --- � - -- 28 ---- u—�'r_- 't - 'A 26.E 1 �, _ s �j i - a/ _ E • _ ® _ sd a sa I r -_ - -- — - - - ,� ' •- .t ® T I ; �-; a {-_L 5--�-• 'I_T T r,cti �- a�r3t•�-1 t�T I �:� � � fJC �1 I Cyt, �31 te'25�, 4IL j I°•,A t,1 2 2612•'D 1 I 1 1 1 1 1�1 1 . , I L. f S.W. colellE�t mm - "-.a - -- -- — ----- ST • ice+ 9 zC. PROPOSAL NO, 1668 - .. - - -- '- City of Tigard Fig 2b Proposal No. 16c e . SE 1/4 NEI/4 SECTION I T 2 S, RI W W.M. U&S..F1c7."N C0047♦oREoO:+ SCALE 1'•70V ]y tI3 r I SEE ..At. •e 2S 1 1AA i W i o i AREA TO BE ANNEXED 1 S'N �e B t °lama 0 G O N Z AGA (77M1 5=' Z - r� nZe�C�I� r9CC: �.i ! �a ' 1 1 .I 'e i I i 1 1 I , 160`p 289 2-Z .SOO hzsoo .Z✓_ 1:0?—3 --, tm "—— arm— 1LLS t.,00 Y '300 o i LLJ iEr: " , :- •SOO '300 :. 1200; �-r-- —T T7, i ! z"-d zoo i 1 s T r t y- f r i �a 1 ► 1 1 � , : p TTjII � ,I .I �1t � !�; ! � I SEE�• .�{,n•. -:� t � � , .I� N �'�- 1 1 , as sr Zcj co -----moi SARA PTON - - �e M( ST 1 -fe _-s ti r 72'V • • i L � 1 1 1 : t li � � � 1 1 1 �' a i �']� ir a4 —_ .—i.�--� r� 12 72 .�•® -- — �9�1_sroe..-- �— � t ` � q� l 13 1 T T * , I ; cm o� , . i t •- � '�t•20:1�Z2.2!•2a2• t� Iq .- t � 1 1 , ;f � � I ' 1 � � ' ,,.s• a.. i.4 i. 1 1 1 ' t �L^P•�u n��o•.�I .. `1 _�u_,�.+.c4tyi:ssrszc:�zST�3=��C...�'T PROPOSAL NO. 1668 CITY OF TIGARD FIG. 2c - e I L E D "IV 1..3 !.J- NOPfV1A l'AULl3S C'Tf OFTI GARD WASHINGTON CCkWM.OREGON November 10, 1981 RE@EOVLEII )lThe Honorable :3orma Paulus Secretary of State NOV 13 1981 State of Oregon NORMA P Salem, Oregon 97310 SECRETARY aF S AITE Dear Mrs. Paulus: The Tigard City Council ratified and confirmed changes in the boundary of the City of Tigard by the Boundary Commission. I am enclosing for your records certified copy(s) of the following ordinance(s)- Boundary Commission Order No. 1668, involving lands of Larsen Annexation dated May 18, 1981, City of Tigard Ordinance No. 81-30. Boundary Commission Order No. 1684, involving lands of Durham Annexation dated May 18, 1981, City of Tigard Ordinance No. 81-31 ,& 81-72. Boundary Commission Order No. 1685, involving lands of Gentle Hoods Annexation dated May 18, 1981, City of Tigard Ordinance No. 81-32 .& 81--73. Please acknowledge receipt of the ordinance(s) on the carbon copy of this letter and return same to our office in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Your cooperation in acknowledging this annexation will be appreciated. Sincerely, } ris Ear ig City Recorder DR:lw • Eac. r 12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171 aeras o�®®ii ®H�H�o HHHbGfH�H � e l STATE OF OREGON) City of Tigard ) I , DORIS HARTIG, hereby certify that I am the duly appointed, qualified, and acting Recorder of the City of Tigard, Oregon. I further certify that I have compared the herewith copy of Ordinance No. 51-30of the City of Tigard with the original in my possession as custodian of the official records of the City of Tigard, and that the herewith copy is a correct transcript of the whale of Ordinance No. 81-30 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and 81the seal of the City of Tigard this 10th day of November �. City ecor e r _ E -- --- 7 CI i i O ORDL1'ZANCE AV OF.DIIvAh10E R VMS TION OF LANDS BY OPTING P_ � THE PALZT4'3Ry CSO:_SSS ON NO. 1668, AND ADOPTING FIiJDIiq'GS T�7TTH RESPECT 1U AN A: OAR ZONi:G Mr- OF TES CITY Or rI �'T'-� +T Zl7 THE 197�J GHRD TO CONr'O2�I xJITFi TIS r,_0 4 PZ.AN AS ADO AVD D QA�tLiVG AN fANTO FIKCNGG PDI FFr^t�jr �D (ZCA 8-$1 La-PSI M-�TTION SHORT TITLE: Larsen Arriexa tion TAX b2P 1S1 36 DD; Lots 800, 801, 900, 1000, 1100, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1700, 1702, 2600, 3001, 3200, 3290, 3300, 3301, 3400, 3700, 3800, 3900, a_ 3402, 3403, 3500, 3600, 800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5300, 5400, 5500, 5600, 5700, 6300, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6200, 6300, 6600, 6700, Tax glap 2S1 lAA lots; 6800, 6900, 7500 and 7600; 100, 1200, 1301, 1400, 1700, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2301, 2400, 2600, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3601, 3700, 3800, 3900, 3901, 4000, 4100, 4300, 4400 4500 5000, 5100, 8200, 8300, 8400, 8500, 8600, 8700, 8900, 9000, 9100, 9101, 9103, 9105, •9106, 9107, and 9001; Tax Map 2S1 1AD bots 2600 and 2700. YLLEd--si i3t.JNri3E�: ?.CPi 8-81, PPFSE ,- W- SHTNIC.MI COU-�j-Y ZOVT :^ E SIC '�0 i Rasadentialns' and CP �Oti.. CH:A'Na:D TO CITY OF TICAA,D A-40 ='-ous D i� l.j r-ial Professional" o I''s1t-iz�iZv zon_s. V qE�A.S the Boundary Cormission, established pursuant to �-� Oregon Laws of 1969, for the Metropolitan Area ChaP er 494 dated I-1 rrh 20, 1981 approved the ha - its Final Order 2:0_ 1668 boundaries of the Ci hereinafter ascribed change in the - filed with the Ci ' of Tigard, and a cflp2, of said F' o city I��-,ar; and anal Order has been 7AF-'I; AS, the City of Ti card, in ac.-or Revised Statutes, has ado dz�-� t:2th C�.aate_r 197 Orem within this Annexation_ `�_ed a Co-prg�iersi ,� Pian .;;li Z izicludes the 1a^„^._s THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLIa.-S: SECTION is Shat the Final Order of the 20th day of yarch, 1981, a �Boundary COm"ission adopted on the by this reference made a part hereog �' .reof is hereto attached an` confircred and ado ted be• and the same is, hereby ratified, set forth he `i r+efe-encs to the stern legal force and effect as if ...rein in full_ S ,=ON 2: That the boundaries of the Ci ' hereby Changed to include a� of Tigard Lam, and they are Order of the Boom g- the lands as decribed in a t Of Tigard are herebydary Commission, and the Cor - w1 Arun changed in conforni pre- limits of the City ty there„rith_ -:a Ordinance N*O. ^t- C- r Circ` of c, �C^_r, ;n tine �O�1G.:1. GiL1R:_ of state (b) Depv� �:.t of Fs��n'; and Tas-=`.�On, j ash�r:;ton Cc,—Ity (c) l-zt --It of Records and Eje'ctir-1s, L.as ington Co z-ity (d) Deparnt of Pu:ci�c L,.orks, _ n _-zetion: Su_-veyor, ::as�ing=�a �-a Coun tv � 2nd-= hereinafter d-2s^_rlbed etre now Zoned as �O�T 4 : Finding tn��t t_- 1 }• � ,.+�,� f'ra' �-' Was'lung`on County vario'.s designat-'O s and fi.-�._r i-nding that oursL-*:t to O'S 197, the City of Tigard has a:aop ed a 17O n 4 Plan S�7 Amt anta south to S•7 Gonzaga S�, s and said la-� on the ar_a of O_ ances i- -r-3 mt ORS 197.175 re tires cities to -n---t �"'-L-^ :r Cor -ern=nsiv` Pla:-s, and Dart-her fir_rd n7 t1-L- - — -nt to abowstated Zori-ig M3p = `gin~ vas press-nte• at a p:io11C h==*'irg held 1931 nt=rjs-`ed -�a`�:, ,5 --a e 1ig--rd C?tV C01`.Zil OP_ 1'.�Yr --1, , _ girded an op--rtU--LZ :y to be heard at this p-!:D11c heap -ng. The Council 23�€..its the follow-is: �stantive fin'ngs (a) That thi s Zone Mac �- n r�rtz is in confo=.,ance with the 2L�J 4 Plan which. 3MION 5: Therefore, pl-=suant to the rte"-' -e.�nJ OE C11-iter 18.88 of t}- Tigard 1'i_'•---_pal Codau , this re -2est -F-,- an Map o_` the City of Ticarrd is h_- ac_ro=y s: � t to ch=_p�vLs' ns Chapter 18.20 of the Tigard i l�yclp mal C�-7e as e-ro3ieu in a��fad rZits "A", and r,Ell attached and L:'z^.- a Y=et Of this 0'_'�.... _ a-— 'S ` i is her=esy C11al'Sed to i--40 vLLZ1g daSiC:'3��10n Of tli� SLlb]eCt. :-ro��erty _ . 't ti-fa-7.ily Res1:.=— al" and CP =c-=nercial �ofesslOna ll Exhibit nyn= I.-g31 DesCriptlon. "B": Tax Map Inas^,cn as it is nece_s----7 for the peace, hea-ith a- J safety ?c f the Cl�'� Ofilr-�,-.; `n t the LoreC'JL" G�"`•_�"..."'=' of the LP'»_ O -- -w"' of the Ci�.y's re%L-3 du, an E i'2r�a'T'�"� s sr e�y declared to e�st, this Or ;mace s .moi hz ef_ec`s-.= zro:i is Asa,_ -03 apn :a7 by the _-a�or. MSED: By �, rr�4 vote o` all Counc ;il e-bers present, after 10 � being read tw'o tures br nt=oer and title only, this 1*2�i`" day of -! a , 1981. Recorder - City of Tigard-j•' 1531. �ROTryD: Ey the Mayor, this /8— day of ,�j a� , tlayor. - City of Tia:r d r i PORTL-1-'\-D �[ETROPOLITA=' kR A LOCAL GOVERN-ENTF B"� D_=,.RY CO'. iISSIO\ 320 S. W. Stark (rS30) - Portland, Ore. 97204 - Tel: 229-5307 FINAL ORDER RE: BOUNDARY CHAINGE PROPOSAL NO. 1668 - Annexation of territory to the Ci r/ of Tigard. Proceedings on Proposal No. 1668 commenced upon receipt by the Boundary Cotnission of a resolution and property o.i-ner consents from the City of Tigard on December S, 1980 requesting that certain property be annexed to the city. The resolution and property oi-.mer consents meet the require- ments for initiating a proposal set forth in ORS 199.490, particularly Section (2) . Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Co-rnission published and posted notice of the public hearing in accordance with OPS 199.463 and conducted a public hearing on the proposal on February 12, 1981. The Co=ission also caused a study to be made on this proposal which considered economic, demographic and sociological trends and projections and physical develop- ment of the land. FIND I\GS (See Findings in Exhibit "A" attached hereto) REASONS FOR DECISION (See Reasons for Decision on Exhibit "A attached hereto) ORDER On the basis of the Findings and Reasons for Decision listed above, the Boundary Commission approved BOUNDARY CF—kNGE PR.OPOSA,I. \O. 1668 on February 12, 1981. N'OW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED THAT the territory described in Exhibit '•B" and depicted on the attached maps, be annexed to the City of Tigard as of the date of approial. PORTI A ND I�M'MPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVER:\3fEN'T BOUNaA RY COMMI SS ION Date: BY: 1 �'7 Peter McDonald V ice-Cnairrtn Attes Page 1 - FELL ORDER i i Proposal i:o. 166S FINT)INGS On the basis of the public hearing and the study the EoLmdary Cc,=ssiort foLmd that: 1. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to the city and contains 23.79 acres , 28 single family residences, one church, and an estirated population of 70 persons and is evaluated at $1,548,500 2. The city desires annexation to extend the city limits to the l'orriwnd city limits, its urban planning area boundary, in order to regularize its boundary and plan for service provision within that houndsYy. 3. 1111 Proposal creates an island of unincorporated lands surrounded by the ci:y to the west_ 4. 1111. territory is developed with low density residential use.,:.. . It is desig- nated Urban on the ATrtro and Washington County Framework Plans. The city plans the area primarily for comimercial Office-Park. S. The LCDC Goals have been' considered and the proposal conforms with the statewide goals. The staff report is referenced for a goal-by- goal analysis b. The territory is within the Metzger Uater District which currently seivrs the arca. 1'lie district has several lines in the area. Metzger Water District provides service for this area of the city and would not be adversely affected by annexation. The district has planned supply and storage adequate to serve the area. 7. ilic territory is within the boundtiry of the Unified Sewerac;e Agency. The agency does not have a collector system available in the area. rk_vcr?opmernt of the industrial Park will provide gravity service to Far•sao Crecy, erossiag urider 217 in the vicinity or liunziker St. The petitioners have also petitioned the city to Form : Local Tmiprove- Mcrt District to obtain sc,;cr service. The city anticipate-s, forming; the 1.. I.1'i_ and planning the construction to serve all of the Tigard Triangle area. S. Fire protection is provided by Washington County P.FPD ;1 which also provides f.re service for the city. The district would not be adversely impacted by annexation. REASONS FOR DECISION 1. The annexation is consistent with regional, county, and city plans and . with LCDC goals. Z. Annexation will make available a full *range of urban services to the area which is part of the Tigard cornunity. a. Annexation is a step toward regularizing the city boundary and ir. rov- ing Planning implementation and police protection for the area. sl ME Proposal No. 1668 { Anne scat ion CITY OF T IC.aRD A certain tract of land located in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West and Section 36 T1SR 1W Washington County,®regon to wit; Beginning at a point North 10 06° West-30 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 25, Block 1 of West Portland Heights, as platted; thence, along the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot 25 and the West line of said Lot 25 and Lots_ 24, 23, 22 and 21 to the South.:esL corner of said Lot 21; thence, 'westerly along the `forth line of Lot 6 said Block 1 to its North- west cccner and the east line of S-W. 70th Avenue (platted German St.) thence, Southerly along the West line of said Lot 6, Block 1 and its Southerly extension to the Southwest corner of Let 8, said Block 1; thence, Easterly along the -South line of said Lot 8 and Lot 18 of said Block 1 to the Northwest corner of Lot 15, said Block 1; thence, Southerly along the West line of said Lot 15 and its southerly extension to the Northwest corner of Lot 7, Block 10 said West Portland Heights Addition as platted and the South line of S.W. Baylor Street (platted Second Street) ; thence, Easterly along the South line of S.W. Baylor Street and its extension across S.W. 69th Avenue (platted Washington Street), a distance of 235 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 9 said West Portland Heights Addition as platted; thence, Southerly along a line half way between the East and West lines of said Block 9 to the Southerly line thereof and the Southwest corner of Lot 23, said Block 9 and the North line of S.W. Clinton Street (platted Third Street) ; thence, Westerly along the North line of said S.W. Clinton Street, a distance of 260 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 25 said Block 10; thence, Southerly along the Southerly extension of the West line of said Lot 25, Block 10 and the West line of Lot 5, Block 11 said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted and its Southerly extension, a i distance of 360 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot '17 said Block 11; I r thence, Westerly along the Worth line of said Lot 17, Block 11 to its � Northwest corned; thence, continuing 'Westerly along the extension of the North line of said lot 17, Block 11, a distance of 30 feet• to the hest line of said West Portland Heights Addition as platted; 6 ( [lienee, Southerly along the 'nest line nr said gest Portlan3 Heights Addition, as platted, a distance of 1070 feet to a point on the West line of said West Portland Heights F.aeitio n, as platted, which point is Westerly 30 feet from the Southwesr corner of Lot 18, Block 21 along the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 18; thence, Easterly along the Westerlv extension of the North line of said Lot 18, Block 21 and said Southtine and its Easterly extension, a distance of 249 feet to the East line of said Block 21 and the Northeast corner of Lot 26, said Block 21; thence, Southerly along the East line of said Lot 26 and its Southerly extension, a distance of 160 feet to the Northeast corner of Block 30, said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; _ thence, Westerly along the North line of said Block 30 and its Westerly extension, a distance of 249 feet to a point on the gest line of said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted, said point being 30 feet Westerly along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Block 30; thence, Southerly along the West line of said Addition, as platted, a which is Westerly 30 feet from the North— distance of 610 feet to a point west corner of Lot 9, Block 31, said hest Portland Heights addition, as platted along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 9, Block 31 ; thence , Easterly along the Westerly extension of, and the forth line of, said Lot 9 and Lot- 36 said Block 31 and the Easterly extension of the :forth line of said Loc 36 to the centerline of S.W- 69th Avenue (platted Washington Street) and the existing city limit line; thence, Northerly along the existinz city limit line 130 feet to the interscoLin« of the centerline of S.W. 69th Avenue and S.14. Gonzaga Street 1platted Seve:lLh Street) ; _ thence, Easterly along the center line of S-W. Gonzaga Street , a distance of 290 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S.W. Gonza?a Street and cite Southerly extension of the West line of Block 23, said ?lest Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Northerly along said last mentioned Southerly extension and the - West line of Block 28, a distance of 350 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 9, said Bloc's 28; thence, Easterly along the North line of Lots 9 and 36 and the Easterly extension of Lot 36 said Block 28, a distance of 230 feet to the center line of S-W. 67th Avenue (platted Lincoln Street) and the existing city limit line; i pLCa (1 I'TV-,T 1-%T'n='1 ' 1160✓ thence, Northvrly along• the cenLerlitie of S.1-1. 67Lh a distance of 130 feet to the centerline of S.W. Franklin Street (platLcd ;; i:.th StrooL'I : thence, 14esterly along the centerline of S .N. Franklin Street , a distance of 260 feet to the centerline of S.W. 68th Avenue (platted Grant Street) ; thence, Northerly along the centerline of S.W_ 6Sth Avenue, a distance of 130 feet, to a point Easterly 30 feet along the Easterly extension of the Solith line of Lot 27 , Block 22 West Portland IIeights Addition; thence, Westerly along the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 27, the South line of Lots 27 and 18, Block 22, said West Portland Heights Addition as platted, to the Southwest corner of said Lot 18, and the 'rest line of said Block 22; thence, Northerly along the West line of said Block 22, a distance of 100 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 15 and Block 22; thence, Easterly a distance of 100 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 15, Block 22; thence, Northerly along the East lines of Lots 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9 and 4 of Block 22 to the Northeast corner of said Lot 4 an-! the South line of S.1:. Elmhurst Street (platted Fifth Street) ; Lhv.nce, Easterly along the South line of S.N. Elmhurst Street and its Easterly extension to. the Northwest corner of Block 23, said West Portland Heights Addition and the East line of S-W. 613th Avenue ; thence, Suutlherly alone: the East line of said S.W. 6SLh Avenue and the Edest line of Block 23 said West Portland heights Addition, as platted, a distance of 10E) feet to the ::orthwtst corr.,-,r of Lot 9 , said rkloci: 23 ; thencc. .F.acr.rrly along the North line of said Lot 9 , a distance of 100 feet to the S6utheast corner of Lot 4, said Tllork 23; thence, Northerly ,along the East line of said Lot 4 and its northerly extension across S.W. Elmhurst Street to a point on the South line of Block 18 said t:zst Portland Heights Addition, said point being the Southeast corner of Lot 22, sail Block la-continuing :Northerly along the EasL line of said Lot: 22 and its Northerly extension to the Northwest corner of Lot 36 said Block 18; thence, Easterly along the North line of said Lot 36 and its Easterly extension to the Northwent corner of Lot 9 Block 17 West Portland Heights Addition; conti,ni:;rZr Easterly along; the North line of said Lot 9 and its Easterly extension to the Northeast corner of Lot 36 said Block 17; `1662, line of S .�!. 66th \vonuc (platted Garfield Screc.- I Ljjc V'oSL ta I Chencc , Northcr!Y along t line of said S -W- 6' th ::venue point oil the U"-:S distance of 410 fvt-L to est portland llcit,hts Additl.Or— r-r OC Lot 32 I�Lock L4 S-id -4 the �.IorLltoa.-,t corner as platted ; alo %, theBorthorth line of said i.ot 32, a distance_ of 100 feet tlience , Wo.sterly tl to the North..je s L corner thereof extension ,hence , Southerly alone, the llc!;t line of Lot 32 and its Southerly to the Northeast corner of Lot 16 , said Block 14 ; its .j,.stOrlV e,-Kterision line of said Lot 16 and Westerly along the North I thence, t 16 oE Block 13 ; discance of 2.50 feet to ,L:_-st corn o[ Lo corner of I.ot 13 , Block 1.3 ; t1lenc-c.. Northeriv 5U feet t o tate SO"theast thence, rastcrl� 'LOU feet to the z)outhp';sr corner of Lot '32 , said BLock 13 arL easterly extension of Easterly 60 feet alonc'Atbo South line of said Lot 32 , Block 13 thence, e of S .I.-7. 67th Avenue and to the :"ortn-,,*cst c=,cr to the Eastlin t tc:d I - heights Addition, as P1," of Lot 14 , BlOck 14 , said We t Port!- lid, V line of said Block 14 and its 1.urtIncrly thence , Northerly 310-19 tl'tc ' Qst I extension and1thu W(-.St line of Block 7, a distance of 635 feet LO ie i Northwest corner of Lot 9 said Block 7 ; tllc.nce. Easterly along the North lines of Lots 9 and 36 said Block 7 , a-, dist;=11CO of 200 feet to the Northeast corner of said T-at 36 ; 7 and its ZT.urt-herty tlience , i1ortlicrly :tion}; the East line of Lot 8 said Block - corner of Moc!c 4 said 140st POrtlun" "c L" i extension to the Southeast Addition; os O- Iatt;gid said gluclk 4 and its Wr---;Lcr1v cxten-; tjjc, Ls thence , 4estc-rly along the South lille of of Block 3 s;jid portlant! Heig.11 to tjl�: SLIUGICaSt corner said Block 3 and its !:C'rC'P.P-rI7 c:`t`ls'on along t1le East line of thence , Nurthcrly as platted , aod the North line of rl' lid IleLghts Addition,to the C West Portland existing city limit line , line of the West Portland Ilei lit- AddLtion, titelice, Vesterly aloe; the North -'M ING L() clic 1,01,LIT Op r)ECE as plat-Led, and the &xisting city limit line Prot 0sal i j Lz s •c i•.^-_.•� aa�wul d ait�cr.� A -' � .. _� s'".- _ v.e-_�_"c-i• _""Ti"T • t► :r—. _ a .'rock�_Z _z• ,. �'sq• 1 r=3'.,_., •z% o >.z. 1 e• �'�La30 = rsro�_ =•' •• �z _ a - a � _13 MdZ - 3 r '--—— — —— —x� �--- — —_'t '—— i z' •— — —�— — — ' • or -' ,m•ret,>► t+ r! ! ' ' • ..- ... rT ? f s ,. .L ,T 1 w +00, I aJ.'S 1T y (t] Mp ►it .- t ►L 12yrjj G, 9 tJ ... 4, r.]•r• i s tr' 'C L•9. •p,1..:1 tI' .t.'te. �. �! ..'. rr. ,t3 ,a :] �y, 9 t0.rr,ti; t1 r••r1 ra } =SVJ 'SAYLOR STREET ui ..t .�• _ a. ]. r,�iR9a��d � 3. �• G. T-•�, �3�, s:; r •a >Z• �; a; r= � ,SJ::J t1ic0: ! t I+s:O ='bl � �:'- t •3.I. _i.. •'3.-„ I 'si� 1 t Li �. 4 I t t t t R AREA TO BE ANNEXED '((�3rco _ _ T _•_ �� "�•—rz5_ x 1 I'3±c 2'- = - - ss i t� �.c"►at-s�ra•�r-� T 37C7 � V • � FIe - _.-}0 ==C Y� s-Zw_1�-rq]_sC 32 ° �]- _'`�i- �J 7 r] -7' a7��.J 1---a 111r _ _ 33 I - �,a R ]r�1 T t •. _ I; 3. sts wata IF-;522_0__ L=mac^�^�� IS , SCJC O�`? P - ` -tr t.? C'1 r i`� �-_-►==-, © Cic I _ I fib=+ �'6�' -� -1� C. 'r3�c�-{GJl -strt is '1 ti_ --�t34:; 7. Pe>a zz,a ?? X r. : 1,1l3 a zt 11 2;2a a zs is T_x• 2;23 i• 23 2ibe > �.2•'2] z5 j. = SYJ C!_1f1Tv 1 =� as �:� -S T.'--EET �- rrcca Z 3 �'�9?J r•y f I it z, 31 at 1: c. r.y ] �i t ' I t .i ! � i � +� :� 't i � ' t •1 i ► �' � T� Cl ►f -r t •-, 1 I I - - t 1 1 N � 'teJ ��sz •e:o 3. 93]J7 'moi ano .e- 9L s szc^ 1' c -s �- to_ _ I _ .s ' IJ 1 31 tr aT_C v rr T y.� x n- --7 - - ' 3.� .• �2-- -- rs.3c 33_ •2 - T 33 1 r2 - I35CD 33 { �------,�..�.- -I ' s- 32� kL-SSCC_;% M} r]- -� _ 7a_^• �'- e \ t, o /^ •� �'•7'��-----'.- •t� � 29 t :[""� I _I29 It6 7_^c�] ,_-•� Y7 �_ _v_>`1 fff� -y �`- •t ' 1 h �j 5103 Z, .'-Ta s2 :� tr O--• - 1'•Y,I{ •aa 1 his .. zx t• t = ,SOy i t 1- •�� T T esr_'•i T .......� b- i tt orr 1 i i i •� ' i l t t e { I t j ; = .r ! � i s NT 1 �� - 1 t ii'r9 =t.L='r2^u Z�bZ r! 2~9 2124 x32d 192 i -225 IZl .. d '�et t. L a••• to ate:- 'ZS T-t� • ' T � � see- -fid PROPOSAL NO . 166S r•TTV nt^ TT/` • ^^ C Nc If'r >�E 1/4 5 GTIOti I T2S R{W W-?A- 0 f, yxSM�tiGrOM COVtirT O7t:G^'• c G/ ta�4� Ste.e. • 9. .2CL SCALE 1"r00 sac r••► SW_ D1RT?,1CUTH S? �_ . •_Tr(_r-l--..1 _ .e 7rf3 ..; ^-•�� f 1 ,:..la , 1 r t c 1 1 ! 1 , I . r ! ► t 1 1 4- a �•,�:, 3,°r ] a1T1S ° ,7iS ,° ]I`. TI* , ; � r i I 1 ± _ 1 1 ! , t ! 1 34 so 3.2co ' , l , 1 1 • I S r 1 t I_L_! _ .c_1 _ t t t ► s - �, .• +.:.s _ _ _ 1ppy�.y�` s�o t, r s- -� --i•- - - a7 7 1�7 !" - - AREA TO BE ANNEXED -- . _ w -'f - - I li r='yu Q l s--- - �---- - 1 1 t 1 1 $ 1 e n,s'.Tltii 23 arae, [n s'zrltzs23.vt�12] r � ' t t t l= 1 ! t t ' '1_t 1 _l j 1 .1._I _ Ll_.l-1 t ..S.1._ _t.�`_l_�_t_t•_l-K sti- . S.w ELMHURST —— � .f w 7 ° ] • lara,,l, . l 1 1 ' I ° r2,3 I]'�t , _ - _ CITY OF TIGARD y - 2t - - 25 EL co 7 I Z7 T T _ . .rs{y;_. .,,� .,,,p0 ,• � 1 r , , ...CCC ' , I 1 �! ►fl 2t 2,1:• 512.1 �• Ht:312�°17 731 N'2]�2 i t l ' l t /� -7-r t- r! 1 \ tip, l " s_t r ' a'-r,I r i n�t n•0:2 i t �! r t I .``i • _ , ,2.14 °1]!417 �>•� i i t ; ( ± _ ' ! I i ! ' , ° ! 7 7 , r of • .,:�1. - +,,;,s•, n �_ _ °>J° _ - - ° -- ---- � -- J 2$- 32 t rte--- - = �1-0 'DrD 271 t!7i0 f�sjt ; • o r � ` -r 1 f"i- race�-1- rl.�i T •/ t r . g t v i .t t' 4%-!- •1a,T ,+cb t o r e l + 1 1 s:� , / cx�61 a ; .i 1.',>'D l.r. 1 7 tl�l 2�tzst u�:•.s]� r tvin>d >stt. sl: �_ ST ~ S.W. �--- I PROPOSAL NO, 1668 -- — -- - i Cit} of Tigard Fig 2b vy�t� SE1/4 'E1/4 5EEC TION I T 2 5 R I W rsS.• CT]N CCtvrr CAECO:+ SCALE •loo' 23 • taa y ••• i L3 1 LJ uj I .• t .A ' REA TO BE ANNE < ' =I 5 G O H Z AGA �' z–�'• !ZS^c '..l � r cc. _� i t i � .. I rr``–�, ,ac;� .. +O•�I�'v�� .. � 1 � a — � ~ -- — — —–, ..eco �—; r __•_ __ j ?- .zeco � _ 1 :eco � - t • < 33 LJ La cc •lwc 1 ' , i •3 :z-ica V•J l 3 c TT 1 T 1 i 3• '.."o 1 r i 1 2 S e . ��' c� i i �• _J . �o= • "i. i_ . � t 1 � ! � i 1' ' � { I •I fig; 1 I ( i 1 -� +�� I � ST 32 3.9 IS 21 I- - t ; —1� c 33� l _ .r • G— ----— — -- • a.:a C i •♦ l 1 1 t .. ' es 578•,25:3•.:•2•• 1� -+l 1-1- -.-�- - -"!7 ' ;j i 1 i I � ' � � f –r.S i`i.==r^r__ •1=ti_V i!.G.=j•.{-._.. –,. .f`•`:.:-r.•–._):tet_--z:.=zz-$i_--=----�� _ PROPOSAL NO. 1665 CITY OF TIGARD FIG. 2c t • s NOTICE TO TAXING DISTRICTS ORS 308 . 225 1 a APPROVED AS r=,_; FROM: ORS SCS 2?r This is to notify you that your boundary t nue in 1 r+ ✓ O✓l County, for STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUEEn A U-R MAPPING UNIT SALEM, OREGON 97310 DES1Rii=TION MAP has been: ED RReceived TO: U�l r ` Approved 4 Z ❑Disapproved (see notes) If disapproved, please submit corrected description and map. s Notes: i 3 FOR NAPPING UNIT AND ASSESSOR, USE ONLY . Department of Revenue f i le no: Q0P- 34 -311—Q�► - Boundary: change(2proposed change❑ received from: rc� � The change is for a: Data received: 0 Formation of a new district ascription Annexation of territory to a district Mao ❑Withdrawal of territory from a district Certified by registered surveyor or registered engineer: L ❑Dissolution of a district ❑ yes Q-<0 CC County Assessor Boundary Cormission (when appropriate) Department of Revenue AdA-0-39(11-75) 1 � ; IS- r• r _ PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOXEILN\E\T BOUN ARY MI—IISSION 320 S. 1,:. Stark (n530) - Portland, Ore, 97204 - Tel: 229-,5307 t t FINAL ORDER RE: BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL NO. 1668 - Annexation of territory to the � City of Tigard. Proceedings on Proposal No. 1668 commenced upon receipt by the Boundary Commission of a resolution and property owner consents from the City of Tigard on Dece,-nber 5, 1980 requesting that certain property be annexed to the city. The resolution and property owner consents meet the require- ments for initiating a proposal set forth in ORS 199.490, particularly Section (2) . 9 Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Commission published and posted notice of the public hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and conducted i a public hearing on the proposal on February 12, 1981, The Commission also caused a study to be made on this proposal which considered economic, i demographic and sociological trends and projections and physical develop- r ment of the land. s FINDINGS (See Findings in Exhibit LLALr attached hereto) REASONS FOR DECISION L (See Reasons for Decision on Exhibit LLA attached hereto) t x a ORDER 4 On the basis of the Findings and Reasons for Decision listed above, the ( Boundary Commission approved BOUNlaARY CHANGE PROPOSAL, NO. 1668 on t February- 12, 1981. NOW 'THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED THAT the territory described in Exhibit LLB" and i depicted on the attached maps, be annexed to the City of Tigard as of the date of approval. d PORTLA:D METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVER11211E dT BOUN ARY CO.M ISSION - ajar S ` ..s r�. rC's t By: Date: 1J { Peter McDonald Vice-Chairman Attes Page 1 - FINAL ORDER G i E\FIBIT "B" Proposal No. 1668 < Annexation CITY OF TIGARD A certain tract of land located in Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West and Section 36 T1SR IW Washington County,Oregon to wit; j Beginning at a point North 10 06' Wast'30 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 25, Block 1 of West Portland Heights, as platted; thence, along the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot 25 and the West line of said Lot 25 and Lots 24 , 23, 22 and 21 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 21; thence, Westerly along the North line of Lot 6 said Block i to its North— west corner and the Last line of S.W. 70th Avenue (platted German St.) thence, Southerly along the West line of said Lot 6, Block 1 and its Southerly extension to the Southwest corner of Lot 8, said Block 1; thence, Easterly along the South line of said Lot 8 and Lot 18 of said Block 1 to the Northwest corner of Lot 15, said Block 1; thence, Southerly along the West line of said Lot 15 and its southerly `f extension to the Northwest corner of Lot 7, Block 10 said West Portland r Heights Addition as platted and the South line of S.W. Baylor Street (platted Second Street) ; thence, Easterly along the South line of S.W. Baylor Street and its ' extension across S.W. 69th Avenue (platted Washington Street) , a distance of 235 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 9 said West Portland Heights Addition as platted; J thence, Southerly along a line half way between the East and West lines of said Block 9 to the Southerly line thereof and the Southwest corner of Lot 23, said Block 9 and the North line of S.W. Clinton Street (platted Third Street) ; thence, Westerly along the North line of said S.W. Clinton Street, a distance of 260 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 25 said Block 10; thence, Southerly along the Southerly extension of the West line of said Lot 25, Block 10 and the West line of Lot 5, Block 11 said West s Portland Heights Addition, as platted and its Southerly extension, a 1 , distance of 360 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 17 said Block 11; t thence, Westerly along the North 'Line of said Lot 17, Block 11 to its Northwest corner; t thence, continuing Westerly along the extension of the North line of said lot 17, Block 11, a distance of 30 feet to the West line of said West Portland Heights Addition as platted; Page 3 - FINAL ORDER WIFM EXFIBIT "A" 1 Proposal No. 1668 FINDINGS On the basis of the public hearing and the study the Boundary Commission found that: 1. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to the city and contains 23.79 acres, 28 single family residences, one church, and an estimated population of 70 persons and is evaluated at $1,548,500 2. The city desires annexation to extend the city limits to the Portland city limits, its urban planning area boundary, in order to regularize its boundary and plan for service provision within that hoLnda'ry. 3. 71ie Proposal creates an island of unincorporated lards surrounded by the city to the west. 4. Ilic territory is developed with low density residential uses. . It is desig- nated Urban: on the Metro and Washington County Framework Plans. 'The city plans the area primarily for commercial Office-Park. S. The LCDC Goals have been considered and the proposal conforms with the statewide goals. The staff report is referenced for a goal-by- goal analysis L 6. 'I`he territory is within the Metzger Dater District which currently Serves the area. 11ie district has several lines in the area. Metzger Water District provides service for this area of the city and would not be adversely affected by annexation. The district has planned supply and storage adequate to serve the area. 7. Ilic territory is within the botuldaery of the Unified Sewerage Agency. The agency does not have a collector system available in the area. Do elopment of the industrial Park will provide gravity service to Fanno Creek, crossing under Ihay. 217 in the vicinity of Iiunziker St. The petitioners have also petitioned the city to form a Local Improve- ment District to obtain sewer service. The city anticipates forming the L.I.D. and planning the construction to serve all of the Tigard x Triangle area. F x 8. Fire protection is provided by Washington County RFPD #1 which also provides f.re service for the city. The district would not be adversely impacted by annexation. REASONS ISR DECISION € E ? . The annexation is consistent with regional, county, and city plans and with LCDC goals. 2. Annexation will make available a full range of urban services to the area which is part of the Tigard community. 3. Annexation is a step toward regularizing the city boundary and improv- ing planning implementation and police Protection for the area. Page 2 - FINAL ORDER ff M MM ' #1668 ff, - - 4 M f thence, Southerly along the West line of said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted, a distance of 1070 feet to a point on the West line of said West Portland Heights Aaaition, as platted, which .point is Westerly 30 feet from the Southwest corner of Lot 18, Block 21 along the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 18; thence, Easterly along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 18, Block 21 and said Southline and its Easterly extension, a distance of 249 feet to the East line of said Block 21 and the Northeast corner of Lot 26, said Block 21; thence , Southerly along the East line of said Lot 26 and its Southerly extension, a distance of 160 feet to the Northeast corner of Block 30, said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Westerly along the North line of said Block 30 and its Westerly extension, a distance of 249 feet to a point on the West line of said i West Portland Heights Addition, as platted, said point being 30 feet Westerly along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Block 30; thence, Southerly along the West line of said Addition, as platted, a distance of 610 feet to a point which is Westerly 30 feet from the North— west corner of Lot 9, Block 31, said West Portland Heights Addition, ' as platted along the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 9, j{ Block 31; thence, Easterly along the Westerly extension of, and the North line of, said Lot 9 and Lot• 36 said Block 31 and the Easterly extension of the i North lint• of said Lot 36 to the centerline of S.W. 69th Avenue (platted Washington Street) and the existing city limit line; thence, Northerly along the existing city limit line 130 feet to the interset-tioll { of the centerline of S.W. 69th Avenin and S.W. Gonzaga Street tplatted SvVC•:101 Street) ; 1 t thence, Easterly along the center line of S.W. Gonzaga Street, a distance of 290 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S.W. Gonzaga Street and the Southerly extension of the West line of Block 23, said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; thence, Northerly along said last mentioned Southerly extension and the West line of Block 28, a distance of 350 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 9, said Block 28; thence, Easterly along the North line of Lots 9 and 36 and the Easterly extension of Lot 36 said Block 28, a distance of 230 feet to the center line of S.W. 67th Avenue (platted Lincoln Street) and the existing city limit line; Page 4 - FINAL ORDER #1668 1 t - r along- the centerline of S.W. 67th Aveliuc , a distance of 130 c thence, Northt ly !� feet Lo the centerline of S.W. Franklin Street (platted 3i.-th Str('(.10 ; thence, Westerly along the centerline of S.W. Franklin Stroet , a distance of 260 feet to the centerline of S.W. 68th Avenue (platted Grant Street) ; thence, Northerly along the centerline of S.W. 68th Avenue , a distance of 130 feet, to a point Easterly 30 feet along the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 27 , Block 22 West Portland Heights. Addition; thence, Westerly alone the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 27, the St►uth line of Lots 27 and 18, Block 22, said West Portland Heights e Addition as platted, to the Southwest corner of said Lot 18, and the ?Jest line of said Block 22; thence, Northerly along the West line of said Block 22 , a distance of 100 Sect to the Northwest corner of I.ot ZS and Block ; thence, Easterly a distance of 100 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot ! 15, Block 22; Z thence , Northerly along the East lines of Lots 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9 and 4 ` of Block 22 to the Northeast corner of said Lot 4 and the South line of S.W- of Street (platted Fifth Street) ; LbV nee, Easterly along the South line of S.ld. Elmhurst Street and its EasterLy f extension to the Northwest corner of Block 23, said !-lest Portland heights i Addition and the East line of S.W. 68th Avenue; thence, Southerly along; the East line of said S.W. 68th Avenue and the West line of Block 23 said West Portland i{eigilts Addition, as platted, a distance 1 of 100 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 9, said Block 23; thence. .Kasrorly along the North line of said Lot 9, a distance of 100 feet to the S6utheast corner of Lot 4 , said Mock 23; thence, Northerly along the East line of said Lot 4 and its Northerly extension across S.W. Elmhurst Street to a point on the South line of Block 18 said Fest Portland Heights Addition, said point being the Southeast corner of Lo[ 22, said Block 18 continuing Northerly along the East Line of said Lot: 22 and its Northerly ! extension to the Northwest corner of Lot 36 said Block 18; 1 thence, Easterly along; the Northline of said Lot 36 and its Easterly extension to ► the Northwest corner of I.ot 9 Block 17 `Rest Portland heights Addition; continuing I Easterly along; rhe ;forth line of said Lot 9 and its Easterly extension to the Northeast corner of Lot 36 said Block 17; Page 5 - FINAL ORDER #1668 thence, Northerly along the West line of S.W. 66th Avenue (platted Garfield Street) a distance of 410 feet to a point un the West line of said S.W. 66th Avenue and the Northeast corner of Lot 32 Block 14 said '.Jest Portland Heights Addition, as platted; f thence, Westerly along, the North line of said Lot 32, a distance of 100 feet a to the Northwest corner Lhercof; thence, Southerly along the We:;t line of Lot 32 and its Southerly extension to the NorLheast corner of Lot 16, said Block 14 ; thence, Westerly along; the North line of said Lot 16 and its Westerly extension a distance: of 260 feet to the Northeast corner of- Lot 16 of Block 13; thence, Noriheriv 50 Beet to the Southeast corner of Lot 13 , Block 13; thence, Wasttrl� •lot} feet to the ziouths asr.• corner of Lot 32, said Block 13; an easterly extension of - thence, Easterly 60 feast alonggAthe South line of said LoL 32 , Block 13 y to the Eastline of S.W. 67th Avenue and to the Northwest corner of Lot 14 , Block 14 , said West Portland Heights Addition, as platted; j thence, Northerly along; the West line of said Block 14 and its Northerly extension and '.the Wast line of Block 7, a distance of 635 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 9 said Block 7 ; thence, Easterly along; the Forth lines of Lots 9 and 36 said Block 7, a distance of 200 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 36; thence, Northerly :along; the East line of Lot 8 said Block 7 and its Northerly cextension to Lhe Southeast eorner of Block 4 said West Portland Heights r Addition; as platted thence, Westerly along; the South line of said Block 4 and its Westerly extension to the Southeast corner of Black 3 said Wast Portland Heig;hLs Addition, as platted; thence, Northerly along; the East line of said Block 3 and its Northerly extension to Lhe North line of the [Jest Portland Heights Addition, as platted, and the existing; city limit line, thence, Westerly along the North line of the West Portland Heights Addition, as planed, and the existing city liinit line Lo the POINT O4= BEGINNI'NG. Page 6 - FINAL ORDER rop ® s a l No. / (06 8 ; �Yc •c!L 7-�Z,5 'R t lAJ s e.4-, / s REET - - F.7z`�;l` • F°£O'= -- � ' o ec-c ; M200 0 4-x. i313 : - - -YJ33 L3_ 14 ' .•• a - zI 1 - 2- -2gj �s solUi l�,�$�ed��•�a ia .. ` 'z `• _»i ,7�W aoo, soon_ I W ,300' I 2 I ` I i z �! 1 . W ''-�`~j �, W 1 : W I 3 n.r r3 .. r'r4-I { 1 3 1 > • (.. z{ Q L! w n,12.!3 •. t313 Q f IQ"'J.- .- aW ® SAYLOR 'es9s STREET � SS zoc° I,9co { i,soo i►c{3 zi i < s 7 •e 31 ls3c si 7 ;5..0 . 370, AREA TO BE ANNEXED 'i 4 ' 1 1 2100 • f - �sy 33 x; %p •oc3 _ ,T e.00 a }S9J 11 {3700 s - - a•1 -a3la_ 33 JO 2300 900- }_00 3z ' ki3 -El i3 a300 3z I 33 3[£ rao l-p 220J 2!-00 a I - - 1 = 1- - �.s! •loo _ }, 11-fi L 3. I 1-- Is �o rs 134-00 3 2 ,3 , 36x IS)i t7 f7 — —Q3r I �,ir7 — -ri ' c, LCI —T �..�30�-{ _ 301 1D +73aoo 3cJr za~_ —�3�1�7 1 �'� — -a29 � -1- :15 2300' i -7 -71 .TML e..• , 27 t \11.� 27 — I _ :, 3,00 1 ! • •�: •`0 ar ar 23 2-a 21 r ni 1:.. j •,® { H 2,2$2;2i a<^4 H!T`xr'22 231 2•n 26 - `�2-42.2326. Y It : sw CLINTOW" _®y „STREET o 7400 000 z13; �9s 7!y� •f,04' 31 ., 3. i. 7,•e -i Z y�• � ��"•7-= ff P aT.T s;sT-.r J 13 i { - 1 I ! i ( 1 .I '_ { i sl3oo I .1 I ! ( I I - •q C�t�� z 6 00— — r:0, —x� asao0_ ssoo_x ss�Ob_i� o x sL 1 L I zoo- 1• n e7 � 1 tr _- -3au - -�5200 0 or r 2 74-00 may_ 12- T a3 I �12 :0900 33 •,a -'2 ---- - Z ---3 aco 'j _ _ �z 13 I —4-so- - _ -{ "�sco_' — r 3 i i�l�•<`=��'r. - Y� ^6300 - I - -r 3 --` -2 111. 30 3 Lls -iCE ie f rL — -- ' 51100 20 . �7.too— -r z7 rw •yf 1 le .0 1 a7 is 1 27 T T 7pp t� CLOS"I I I I� sa00 I ! I Y : I I•( T i 1 0 a Lam t1 1 m�t i i o a t a w• -i-s.19.m 2r 2;YS 2-23 z •• •ry 20 Jf z3 2�z1 2 191 1211 Ya z1 2e 2S 241 ay r II ' 121 1 1 a L .•`. -1- j�b 20 21, 2; / a < S W =—�• gARTNfOUTM S& - - - - - - r p -�:7 . PROPOSAL NO. 1668 CITY OF TIGARD FIG. 20j CC0 F. ciE:Z i Proposal No. / 6 ' 8 � NE 1,94 NE 1/4 SECTION I T2S RIW W.M. ]. y 2s r ^/� weSM1wGTOM COUNir OREGON See T� �a S(( MAP SCALE !'•100• - - - - - + 1 .5 { fff 1' S4FL E)AP7P1OUTH ST .00 1• 1 1 2 1] a ]f 6 9 f® � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! _ss10 !L 7aoti n 3• _� I -t-- a 16 LLJ LLS LIS - a i " -- AREA TO BE A\VEYED "°' -NI 540. 11 ! tioi 1 I 2. a3t I 1 ! ! 1 . f 'aa Ife�,o'a.l2:la�.g2],?26 ! � � . + e 1 1 I i i i • i -` _! _i_l-°_1 ►..j-'ri r':..i r.`•1r: — ?' �'•1_� 2 _1 1_ 1 _I..l _ i_.!-1 � t .I.1 _'— rK s�•'vvl�� r ( S.W. ELhAHURST _. . �. .- 3 Cr ' ItaWl ' . � 1 1 1 3 ! 1 t 1 1 I 1 /�2'] I]t6 7`• 4. r � °�'i21] ° !]16;x;9 1 1 1• 1 ; 1 1 1 l + 1 1 1 _L ! 700 "T y_ r � - -- Lv 1 _ - r -- - CITY OF TIGARD r ..as( 'a1U a,.y7 ,aY ® >t ! 1 1 1 •. J •� ( �' ! ! 1 + i ' ; , ; 1 1 . ! . 2112 ' 7+123.zd Q 9+ •'ffi2•'7 a'21126125+I °, • - ' ' i-a-.. ,_1- ..rc..r -L •6RQ yr �.. 8 � S-W. Pttr° � ( swat -�-r-r t. 1 •r 1 •TT +�y ' 9xa r { ntoo! 9 m 1 �. ti.n•: ' 1 ! i 1 ! 1 ► ' I 1 7 1)1 a 5 !2 1 9 tq =1112.]' 5:6,x+111( 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 Z 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < 36 - -Y - a 1-_ it 54 -- - _ rj -- - _ - o .s;<,a- 291+j vi 28 3 26 13 32 0 30 9 " __. - _ - -- - -- ----- 1{ noo - �raA zr } •( is r r - -- - - - - ---• it - - -- _ � s ` r d �_ � ,:cu r--t- t.n1-7-1- rirSut •i .� q+ .� : : ' i . ' � � . � ' e � : I . ! 1 � ,p 2.1a2�7�;7.�a51 �I• 1 -i .I.W.l.12t; w" b:. �.�•.1 :..f '°- :.:_ ..:...:moi_ e f. .'.:` �_J_t_1 -•--1-� -�-i-1--2- r r Ir.r S. ' �A - - -- S7. - 051c. PROPOSAL NO, 1668 City of Tivard Fig 2b-,`,-►rt Proposal No. 1 SEI/4 NEI/4 SECTION t T2S RI W W.M. %AS.NGTpN COVNTT ONEGOY SCALE 1'•100' 1 I SEE YAP 1 :. ZS 1 1A• I 1 W I W LU I > I > a I < L AREA TO BE A�rNEXED Q T` } S W o eetle2ea o etasTees a G O N Z A G A (T T11t r? z r:�c .s a `7ee-'i a� Iron I ! loo _ vJ� -. — — —— — — • 1 1600_ -:-200 r1 I !';: --- -- --� $ :2=000 ` -3300 z • —^�:aoo _ g "; w Z —_ -- - —— i� �� - - dee ' 1 A so '—T 1 1200• — _^ SEE ra.t- •3J•d .f.•ate. I 1 :� 250q 2,00 ; 1 » TF 71 1 :rf. I �r Icc E =--S N------� - - —-=HAMPTON _ .:tg.Mt - ST •1'acc 1`yl'. ..I. 't,a'.••sls! ` 76-7-35-7Ir 1^scow.. ! - -f--- --_•- ---- ,6;--' z9 I ';-��•'- x'$•1.3• -Jr - � ,` i � �'- -- -- T. •` ' t — �=r 1. ci 4 � 1 I � r•.. { .Is azo z. 22•xa•2•a•, I• _ 1 I { � , :i � I � � i � s , � Lter.5;ii=—�s'•^*rz-�-- i fir'G._.!_.-e. -.. - t PROPOSAL NO. 1668 CITY OF TIGARD FIG. 2c . - s��B! FIN j =mom mum= "=N' PaLA"WOUM Findings Policies & Implementation Strategies ti i 7F., "\II/ f 1 't�-- I �•. 1, � � ' rte ' � \ 1� I J 1 WA SHINIGi COMM.OREGON t� r M19 TIGARD i CONPREHENSIVE; PLAN FINDINGS, POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRAIEGIES October 1982 Revised February 1983 CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION Wilbur Bishop - Mayor Frank Tepedino - President John Cook Cliff Speaker Iom Brian Donald Moen Nancie Stimler - Former Member Richard Helmer - Former Member Ken Scheckla Mark Christen Ima Scott Roy Bonn Bonnie Owens Deane Leverett Phil Edin Ron Jordan Committee for Citizen Involvement Wilbur Bishop - Mayor Frank Tepedino - Planning Commission President Park Board Chairman John Butler - NPO #1 Bruce Clark - NPO #2 Lou Ane Mortensen - NPO #3 Rich McMahon - NPO #4 Chris Vandenwood - NPO #5 Phillip Pasteris - NPO #6 Nancy Robbins - NPO #7 Project Staff William A. Monahan - Director of Planning & Development Jeremy Coursolle - Associate Planner Liz Newton - Associate Planner Ed Sullivan - City Attorney Adrianne Brockman - City Attorney Office Loreen Wilson - Office Manager Patt Martin - Word Processing V Diane Jelderks - Planning Secretary l t:. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 1. General Policies 5 2. Citizen Involvement 8 3. Natural Features ana Open Space 11 3.1 Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards 11 3.2 Floodplains and Wetlands 13 3.3 Natural Resources 14 3.4 Natural Areas 15 3.5 Parks, Recreation and Open Space 16 3.6 Park Standards 18 3.7 Historical-Cultural Resources 20 4. Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 21 4.1 Air Quality 21 4.2 Water Quality 23 4.3 Noise Pollution 24 4.4 Land Resources 25 5. Economy 26 6. Housing 30 6.1 Housing Needs 31 6.2 Housing Costs 33 6.3 Established Residential Areas 34 6.4 Developing Residential Areas 35 6.5 Housing Conditions 36 6.6 All Areas 37 7. Public Facilities and Services 38 7.1 General 39 7.2 Storm Drainage and Wastewater Management 41 7.3 Water Service 42 7.4 Sewer Service 43 7.5 Police Protection 45 7.6 Fire Protection 46 7. 7 Private Utilities 47 7.8 Schools 48 7.9 Health Services 49 7.10 Local Government Facilities 50 7.11 Library Services 50 7.12 Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling 51 8. transportation 52 8.1 Traffic Ways 53 8.2 Public Transportation 56 8.3 Transportation for the Disadvantaged 57 8.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathways 58 8.5 Railroad 58 9. Energy 59 10. Urbanization 62 11. Special Areas of Concern 67 12. Locational Criteria 73 f 1N1KODUC1 ION PURPOSE: The Comprehensive Plan is the document through which the citizens of Tigard have made the basic choices on how land development and redevelopment should occur, and how it will be managed. After many years of segmented planning, the seven separate Neighborhood Planning Organization plans comprised the communities planning efforts, this Comprehensive Plan is intended to aggregate the community's planning efforts into one "Community Wide Comprehensive Plan" for the Tigard Urban Planning Area. The purpose of the plan is to maintain and improve the existing quality of life for the residents by: 1. Prohibiting development which would cause a diminution in the existing quality of life for the residents of Tigard; 2. Protecting individuals from the negative impact of developing land which have natural hazards and are subject to natural disasters ; 3. Identifying and protecting resource lands from urban development encroachment ; 4. Providing for the retention of natural and cultural resources which contribute to the livability of the community; 5. Providing adequate land to meet anticipated future demands for urban development in a logical and orderly manner; 6. Encouraging flexibility and innovation in development techniques to permit diversity within the community and to slow the increase in development costs ; 7. Reducing the uncertainty of the development process; _ 8. Contributing to a healthy, stable and diversified economy within Tigard; 9. Providing for an orderly and timely arrangement and provision of public facilities and services to function is the framework for urban development; and 10. Facilitating citizen participation in all phases of the planning process. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan is the plan on which land use decisions will be made for the area within the Tigard Urban Planning Area during the planning period (1980-2000). In areas outside the Tigard city limits, Washington C County retains legal jurisdiction over development proposals and public improvement projects. the City, however, reviews and makes recommendations on proposals and projects inside the Urban Planning Area, and often coordinates with the County on related projects. -1- An Urban Planning Area Agreement between Tigard and Washington County regarding planning in the Tigard Urban Planning Area has been adopted. This agreement includes recognition of a Urban Planning Area boundary and related Policies which are intended to: 1. Identify planning efforts for the City of Tigard and Washington County; 2. Provide for an orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable to urban land; and 3. A process by which the City may expand the Urban Planning Area boundary when the City, County and affected property owners find that such an extension is necessary. PLAN FORMAT Each of the first eleven Plan Sections are organized in the following manner: 1. An introductory statement including a discussion of the intent and purpose, precedes each policy; 2. Brief statements of the findings which were developed for the factual material in the comprehensive plan resource reports ; 3. The policy statements and directives to the City for making decisions and preparing plans ; and 4. Implementation strategies which are recommendations and set forth the i means for implementing the plan; i.e. , the preparation of specific plans, adopting of regulations, and special study commissions. The twelfth chapter of the document contains location criteria policies which establish standards for the designation of land use areas on the plan map and in making decisions on development proposals. These policies apply to the location of housing, commercial, industrial and public utilities and facilities. The policies establish the limits within which land development will occur in Tigard over the planning period (from 1980-2000) . They also provide the generalized framework upon which more detailed plans and implementation mechanisms will be based. These may include: 1. The application of the plan policies when reviewing development requests subdivisions, planned developments, district changes, etc. 2. The formation of land development regulations into a unified Community Development Code; 3. The establishment of a growth management system which coordinates and evaluates a wide variety of existing mechanisms for the purpose of guiding the timing, type, and location of growth; -2- maw- 4. The updating and yearly evaluation of the capital improvement program for the acquisition and development of public facilities and services ; 5. The coordination agreements between jurisdictions and other agencies ; 6. The continued work on the Tigard downtown urban revitalization project ; 7. The application of functional plans such as transportation, parks and recreation, sanitary sewers , water, etc. , to urban planning and reviewing developments ; and 8. The requirements of the City Charter, City ordinances, and City Council policies. Due to the nature of the planning process, the contents of many of the chapters are interrelated with each other. No chapter is complete unto itself. Each chapter represents an aspect, from a particular point of reference, of a total system of policy direction. Thus the plan needs to be viewed and used as a whole. The legal effects of the policies and imple.:�ntation strategies are twofold: 1. They set direction for the City during the planning period ; and 2. They establish the basis for an ongoing work program for the City. Another integral aspect of the comprehensive plan is the Comprehensive Plan Map, which is intended to be the visual representative of the policies and adopted land uses. Where there may be apparent inconsistencies between the policies and the map, the policies shall control. GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION The City's planning efforts include not only the City's commitments to land use planning, but also those planning and development commitments made by other governmental jurisdictions and agencies. 1. Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) State law mandates that cities and counties prepare comprehensive plans in accordance with applicable statewide land use planning goals. LCDC's land use planning goals establish a planning process and a policy framework to guide all decisions and actions related to he use of land. The City's plan is intended to be consistent with applicable LCDC goals. 2. Metropolitan Service District (MSD) MSD, the regional planning agency, has adopted regional policy guidelines for managing growth within the regional urban growth / boundary (UGB). Although these policy guidelines are not absolute requirements, they do establish objectives and targets for the region. Major identified urban growth policies are: -3- i I MMMF i a. Urban Growth Boundary Findings ; b. Housing Goals and Objectives ; and c. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) . 3. Washington County The Urban. Planning Area Agreements (UPAA) , drawn between the cities and the county, identify areas of planning interest together with appropriate policy commitments (i.e. , growth management strategies, annexation policies) . The UPAA's provide an opportunity for the cities and the county to comment on a variety of land use actions in unincorporated Washington County. HOW TO USE THE PLAN FOR LAND USE ACTIONS 1. Functions of the Plan The plan services an administrative as well as legislative function. With respect to administrative or quasi-judicial matters, the plan establishes a policy framework for decision making on such matters as: a. Revisions to the Comprehensive Plan; b. Zoning district changes ; c. Conditional developments ; and d. Subdivisions. 2. Land Use Actions - How to Use the Plan In order to determine the effect of the plan on individual parcels of land, or on proposals for development, the following steps can be follows: a. Determine the land use classification that applies to the parcel of land and read the related plan text and policies; b. Call the City Planning and Development Department, and ask for the zoning district designation on the property by providing them with the legal description, i.e. : the Section, Township, Range and Lot_ Number or Subdivision Name, Block and Lot Number; c. If the plan and zoning accord with what you want to do, check with the Planning and Development Department to determine if there are any other applicable regulations ; or d. If the plan or zoning district prohibits the proposed use, request of a preapplication conference with the Planning and Development Department staff for assistance in determining all of the alternative courses of action. -4- UMMULM 1. GENERAL the purpose of this section is to establish the relationship between the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan an! : 1. The Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 197 and the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines of the Land Conservation and Development Commission; 2. The Regional Plan set forth by the Metropolitan Service District ; 3. The Comprehensive Framework Plan and policies of Washington County; 4. The requirement that plans be updated. the plan will be updated to ensure that the plan as the land use policy for Tigard reflects the changing needs and circumstances of the community. FINDINGS o Each plan adopted under the Land Conservation and Development Commission's Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines must: 1. Goal #1 : Develop a citizen involvement program that ensures the opportunity for citizens to get involved in all aspects of the planning process. 2. Goal X62: Establish a land use planning process and policy framework as the basic of all land use decisions and actions, and ensure an adequate factual data base to substantiate those decisions and actions ; 3. Goal #3: Preserve and maintain agricultural lands beyond the Urban Growth Boundary of the community, 4. Goal #4: Conserve forest lands not committed for urban uses, for strictly forest uses. 5. Goal #5: Conserve open space and protect natural and service resources ; 6. Goal #6: Maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources ; 7. Goal #7: Protect the community's life and property from natural disaster and hazard areas ; 8. Goal #8: Meet the recreational needs of the community, State, and visitors ; l 9. Goal #9: Diversify and improve the economy of the community and the State ; 14. Goal 410: Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and state; -5- 11. Goal #11: Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development. 12. Goal #12: Provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system; 13. Goal #13: Conserve energy; and 14. Goal #14: Provide for an orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable to urban land uses. o The Metropolitan Service District established a Regional Urban Growth Boundary which includes enough land necessary to accommodate urban land needs to the year 2000. This boundary includes all of Tigard. o The City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan includes basically three parts: The first part includes the individual comprehensive plan reports (Citizens Involvement; Natural Features and Open Space; Air, Water and Land Resources ; Economy; Housing; Public Facilities and Services; Transportation; Energy and Urbanization. ), which constitute the findings ; the second part of the plan includes the summary and policy document for the findings, polices and implementation strategies ; and the third part of the plan includes the Tigard Community Development Code, which set forth the development standards and outlining the procedures for obtaining the necessary development approvals. o The ongoing planning program will include the preparation of a capital improvements plan outlining the major capital investments needed to realize full development of the planning area, finding sources and a budget. POLICIES l.l.l THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT: a. THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ALL FUTURE LEGISLATIVE CHANGES SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS ADOPTED BY THE LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, THE REGIONAL PLAN ADOPTED BY THE METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT; b. ANY NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION PLANS AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHALL BE DESIGNED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THIS PLAN; AND C. THE TIGA,RD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SHALL BE KEPT CURRENT WITH THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY. IN ORDER TO DO E` THIS: 1. THIS PLAN SHALL BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS. -6- 1. 1.2 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND EACH OF I'1S ELEMENTS SHALL BE OPENED FOR AMENDMENTS THAT CONSIDER COMPLIANCE WI'1H '1HE PLANS OF 'LHE MEIROPOLITAN SERVICE DISIRICT (MSD) OR ITS SUCCESSOR ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, AND MAY BE SO AMENDED OR REVISED IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY COUNCIL. ANNUAL AMENDMEN'l AND REVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE REGIONAL GOALS , OBJECTIVES AND PLANS SHALL BE CONSISIENI WITH ANY SCHEDULE FOR RE-OPENING OF LOCAL PLANS APPROVED BY THE LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (LCDC). THIS PROVISION IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS WAIVING ANY LEGAL RIGHTS WHICH THE CITY MAY HAVE TO CHALLENGE THE LEGALITY OF A REGIONAL GOAL, OBJECTIVE, OR PLAN PROVISION. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map and the Official Development District map (Zoning) will reflect the plan policies and apply land use categories in the following manners: a. Low Density Residential - 1 to 5 units to the net acre. The applicable development districts are all single family residential (R-1, R-2, R-3.5 and R-4.5) b. Medium Density Residential - 5 to 12 units to the net acre. The applicable development districts are single and multiple family (R-7 and R-12) . C. Medium - High Density Residential - 12 to 20 units to the net acre. The applicable development district is R-20. d. High Density Residential - 20 to 80 units to the net acre. The applicable development distric,�_ are R-20, and R-40. e. Neighborhood Commercial - Areas of concentrations of small commercial and personal service activities and related uses necessary to satisfy the daily shopping and related needs of nearby residents. The applicable development district is Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). i f. Linear Commercial - Refers to areas for auto-oriented and related commercial uses located along major trafficways. The applicable development districts are General Commercial (C-G) and Highway Commercial (C-H). g. Professional Office Commercial - Areas deemed appropriate for business and professional offices and related uses. The applicable development district is Professional and Administrative Office (C-P). h. Central Business District - The area deemed appropriate for high intensity mixed use development allowing commercial, office, as well as higher density residential uses of 40 units per acre or higher. The applicable development districts are, the Central Business District (CBD) and the T.U.R.A. Special District which limits residential uses to 12 units per acre. -7- La®gFiFYI®fiY�em� rw� �®®vii i. Light industrial - Refers to areas deemed appropriate for industrial activities which include manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging or treatment of products from previously prepared materials and which are devoid of nuisance factors that would adversely affect other properties . The appropriate development districts are Light Industrial (1-L) and Industrial Park (I-P) which also permitted offices and related uses. j . Heavy Industrial - Those areas deemed appropriate for intensive manufacturing, process, or assemble semi-finished or finished products, including fabrication, and whose operating characteristics are potentially incompatible with most other land uses. k. Public/Institutional - Refers to areas deemed for municipal uses , school uses or other public uses, e.g. , Durham Treatment Plant. 1. Open Space - Areas designated for retention in a natural state and for development for recreational uses, e.g. , floodplain, parks , etc. 2. The Community Development Code (C.D.C. ) shall provide quasi-judicial changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map may be initiated by affected parties on a semi-annual basis and approved if the City Council finds: a. The change is consistent with applicable plan policies ; b. A change of physical circumstances has occurred since the original designation; and/or C. A mistake was made in the original land use designation. 3. Functional master plans shall be prepared and implemented in conformance to the Comprehensive Plan and the Tigard Community Development Code. 2. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT This chapter addresses Statewide Planning goal #1: "To develop a citizen involvement program that ensures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process.1° Tigard is now well known for its active citizen participation program; primarily with the Neighborhood Planning Organizations. Through the drafting and adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, these organizations contributed their time and energy developing Tigard °s plan. -8- M� MOM Plan policies have been prepared to preserve the continuity of 'Iigard ' s active citizen involvement program ana to ensure that citizens will cuntinue to have access to information that enables them to identify , understand , and have input in the planning issues related to implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Additional information on this topic is available in the "Compret-lensive Plan Report: Citizens Involvement." FINDINGS o Throughout the development of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, the City has actively sought the participation of Neighborhood Planning Organization and other citizens groups. o The Neighborhood Planning Organizations and the Committee for Citizen Involvement have met on a monthly basis throughout the Comprehensive Plan revision process. o Continued citizen participation in all aspects of land use planning helps to ensure that City government meets the needs of Tigard's citizens. o In order to participate in land use planning decisions, citizens need to have access to information which enables them to become aware of and informed about planning issues and City policies. It is essential that this information be made available to all citizens in an understandable form. o Land use planning education is an important method to promote and stimulate interest in the citizen participation process during all phases of planning. POLICY 2. 1.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AN ONGOING CITIZEN INTVOLVEMENT PROGRAM AND SHALL ASSURE THAT CITIZENS WILL BE PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF THE PLANNING PROCESS. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES I. The City shall periodically review notification requirements and methods to determine if they adequately provide notice to affected citizens and revise these requirements and methods as necessary. 2. The City shall continue to inform, in a timely manner, all of the Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO) and other citizens groups on all land use planning matters. t 3. The City shall continue to assist and support any City Council recognized citizen group in providing adequate meeting places, distribution of materials, policy direction and staff involvement . F 1 6 2 G !I -9- ! 4. Additional citizen task forces shall be appointed by the City Council, as the need arises , to advise the City with regard to Comprehensive Plan issues. POLICY 2.1.2 THE OPPORTUNIITES FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROVIDED BY THE CITY SHALL BE APPROPRIATE TO THE SCALE OF THE PLANNING EFFORT AND SHALL INVOLVE A BROAD CROSS-SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY: a. THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS SHALL BE THE PRIMARY MEANS FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROGRAM; b. WHERE APPROPRIATE OTHER INVOLVEMENT TECHNIQUES WILL BE USED; AND C. THE COMMITTEE FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVALUATING THE PROGRAM AND FOR WORKING WITH. THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS IN RECOMMENDING CHANGES IN THE PROGRAM. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Committee for Citizen Involvement and the Neighborhood Planning Organizations shall conduct their citizen involvement programs in accordance with the needs of the Tigard community and LCDC Goal 1 requirements. A review and evaluation of each group's programs and processes shall be reported to the Planning Commission and City Council on a yearly basis. 2. The City Council, the Planning Commission the Committee for Citizen Involvement and the Neighborhood Planning Organization shall recommend, as needed, additional methods for involving citizens in the planning process. POLICY 2.1.3 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT INFORMATION ON LAND USE PLANNING ISSUES IS AVAILABLE IN AN UNDERSTA14DABLE FORM FOR ALL INTERESTED CITIZENS. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall continue to publish information on land use planning issues in a form accessible to all citizens and shall use the Committee for Citizen Involvement and Neighborhood Planning Organizations as the resources for performing such reviews. -10- AMA 3. NATURAL FEATURES AND OPEN SPACE This chapter addresses a broad range of topics all having to do with the natural resources within the Tigard Urban Planning Area. This chapter reflects the concerns expressed in several of the Statewide Planning Goals including: Goal #3 - Agricultural Lands ; Goal #4 - Forest Land; Goal #5 - Open Spaces ; Scenic and Historic Areas and Natural Resources; Goal #7 - Areas subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards ; and Goal #8 - Recreational Needs. The natural environments within the planning area offer many opportunities for unique and healthy urban development. Those environments, when viewed as a series of systems rather than isolated features, will provide Tigard with those elements necessary for a healthy place in which to live, work, and play. Floodplain greenways, for example, can provide the community with an excellent system of open space links between neighborhoods and services, in addition to providing a relatively inexpensive system for storm water runoff. It is to the community's benefit that consideration be given to both the opportunities and the limitations of the various environments within the planning area. The natural environments included within the planning area all have their own respective limitations with regard to urbanization. Development pressure upon lands with such limitations can have profound effects on the environment. Erosion of steep slopes caused by inappropriate development, for instance, does not occur as an isolated incident. Soil type, permeability, vegetation, and drainage all play major roles in and are effected by development. Likewise, the effects of inappropriate development located within the floodplain areas could have adverse effects on properties both up and down stream from the development site. The social, cultural, and economic values of such resource lands could be reduced by the effects of urban development nearby. The limitations of the various environments should be considered in reviewing new development within the planning area. The recognition of the natural environment in the planning area and the development of findings and policies which address the characteristics of the environment are extremely important elements in the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of this chapter is to define the parameters of the various natural environments in the planning area and to identify the limitations and opportunities inherent in those environments. Additional information on this topic is available in the "Comprehensive Plan Report: Natural Features and Open Spaces." 3.1 PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS AND NATURAL HAZARDS FINDINGS o The physical features which form the make-up of any piece of land have a direct relationship to the type and density of development which can be accommodated on that property (carrying capacity). Combinations such as steep slopes and unstable soils create severe development constraints. Excessive development in such physically limited areas greatly increases the potential severity of landslide, earthquake damage, flooding, etc. -I 1- 12 1 111115 o Many portions of the floodplain area contain natural aspects such as significant vegetation, wildlife, scenic areas and are valuable for open space and recreation. o Vegetation serves an essential element in the process of runoff and erosion control, as well as for the protection and natural habitation of wildlife. Nonetheless, it is too often removed and replaced by buildings and impervious surfaces. o Due to the general nature of soils and geologic mapping, site specific analysis is often necessary to determine the presence of geologic hazards and the severity of soil problems which are constraints to development. Such geologic hazards exist when certain combinations of slope, soil, and bedrock combinations, and moisture conditions render land unstable. o Earthflow and slump topography exist in hilly sections of the planning area and are associated with poor drainage, shallow subsurface flow on ground water and springs, and high susceptibility to erosion. Earthflow and slump occurrences can destroy roads and buildings, and adversely affect water quality. Mass movement has not resulted in any major loss of life or property thus far, because lit*le in the way of urban development exists on land with serious problems. o Increased runoff and sedimentation from poorly developed hillsides can require increased public expenditures for flood and erosion control and storm water management. o The City of Tigard had adopted a 11Hillside Development Provision" within the Sensitive Lands ordinance which requires additional review of those developments. o The City of Tigard requires new developments to have a storm water runoff plan to ensure against adverse effects zuch as erosion and sediment. POLICY 3.1.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT ALLOW DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS HAVING THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS EXCEPT WHERE IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT ESTABLISHED AND PROVEN ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES RELATED TO A SPECIFIC SITE PLAN WILL MAKE THE AREA SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: a. AREAS HAVING A HIGH SEASONAL WATER TABLE WITHIN 0-24 INCHES OF THE SURFACE FOR THREE OR MORE WEEKS OF THE YEAR: b. AREAS HAVING A SEVERE SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL; C. AREAS SUBJECT TO SLUMPING, EARTH SLIDES OR MOVEMENT; d. AREAS HAVING SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%; OR e. AREAS HAVING SEVERE WEAK FOUNDATION SOILS. -12- NINIffiff l IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall designate on a map areas having physical limitation (poorly drained, seasonally flooded, ground instability) and shall inccrporate these designations in the Tigard Community Development Code and map, and shall develop graduated development restrictions according to the distinct characteristics of the constraints and anticipated limitations. 2. The City shall revise the sensitive lands section of the Tigard Community Development Code to identify those areas that have distinct constraints and limitations. 3. The City shall cooperate with other agencies to help identify these areas. 4. The City of Tigard shall provide in the Community Development Code that the City may require site specific soil surveys and geologic studies where potential hazards are identified based upon available geologic and soils evidence. When natural hazards are identified, the City will require that special design considerations and construction measures be taken to offset the soil and geologic constraints present in order to protect life and property, and to protect environmentally sensitive areas. 5. The Community Development Code shall not permit developments to be planned or located in known areas of natural disasters and hazards without appropriate safeguards. 3.2 FLOODPLAINS AND WET LANDS FINDINGS o The objective of the City is to use the detailed information gathered on floodplains from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and develop policies to: 1. Control development, as to not adversely affect the floodplain and floodway areas, 2. Minimize the runoff-erosion impact of development on the surrounding area and downstream properties, and 3. Emphasize the retention of a vegetation buffer along streams and drainageways, to reduce runoff and flood damage and provide erosion and siltation control. o In addition, there is the issue of the cumulative effect of development upstream of Tigard. Flood levels in Tigard will be substantially determined by the controls exercised over development outside the plan area, as well as inside Tigard's Planning Area. o The Fanno Creek drainage system includes numerous small water courses. The integrity of these natural drainageways is intrinsically connected to the system's capacity to absorb excessive runoff and on subsequent flood -13- �.� Mon levels. Often, however, water courses are altered to provide more usable land. The resultant adverse impacts are detrimental to the entire drainage system. i.e. , the storage capacity at the water course is f lessened and flooding occurs. a Besides the basic need to control development in flood prone areas, it was found that public knowledge of floodplain hazards was lacking. Many of the obstructions previously placed in the floodplain were the result of either ignorance or overly optimistic attitudes about potential flooding problems. These obstructions (e.g. Main Street Bridge) hinder the flow of high water and tend to increase flood levels. o Proper administration of the floodplain areas relies heavily upon the availability of adequate information upon which to assess the environmental impacts of a project. The development, which creates the need, should be responsible for providing the City with the necessary data for making sound decisions. The burden is on the applicant to prove that a project will not adversely affect the environment or create undue future liabilities for the City. o The City of Tigard, with assistance from The U.S. Army Corps of Engi tiers, has established an area designated within the 100-year floodplain. o The City of Tigard has been accepted as an eligible area for the National Flood Insurance Program, and as a result flood insurance will be available to property owners in flood prone areas. The federal program, however, requires the City to adopt an ordinance which meets certain federal standards. t o The City of Tigard currently has ordinances, policies and standards within the Tigard Community Development Code which provide adequate controls for development within floodplain areas. o According to the 1981 Drainage Master Plan Study conducted by CH2M Hill j for the City, flood levels of two to four feet higher than the existing 100-year flood plain may be expected if no corrective measures are taken. (POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES TO BE INSERTED) 3.3 NATURAL RESOURCES 1 i FINDING o Currently, there are extensive rock and gravel extraction areas located to the north and west of Tigard's planning area but within Beaverton and Washington County. o There are no known mineral or aggregate resources within the Tigard Planning Area. (See Washington County Resource Document, Volume I, 1982. ) i POLICY 3.3.1 THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL SUPPORT THE EFFORTS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, BEAVERTON AND THE METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT TO ENSURING THE AVAILABILITY OF THE ROCK MINERAL RESOURCES. ..r I r" IMPLEMENTATION SIRAIEGY 1. The City shall encourage those jurisdictions regulating rock extraction to closely monitor the relationship between the demand for the resource and the amount of land planned for rock and gravel extraction and processing. 3.4 NATURAL. AREAS FINDINGS o There are a variety of plants, animals and water fowl with the Tigard planning area which greatly add to the quality of life within the community. o Each species requires a complex and often, a narrowly specific set of conditions with respect to food, water, and vegetative cover or other natural features necessary for escape and reproduction. o The significant plant communities and animal habitat areas are the riparian vegetation adjacent to the water resources in the community, and various stands of timber and brush. o Development adjacent to existing wildlife areas can adversely effect these areas and in some instances can virtually eliminate these needed wildlife habitat areas. o Vegetation contributes to the aesthetic quality of the community. Vegetation controls erosion, absorbs sound, and moderates temperatures. It also affects the flow and moisture content of the air, reduction of air pollution and glare, and softens the impact of the urban environment. POLICIES 3.4.1 THE CITY SHALL DESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AS AREAS OF SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN. a. SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS; b. AREAS HAVING EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH VALUE, SUCH AS GEOLOGICALLY AND SCIENTIFICALLY SIGNIFICANT LANDS; AND C. AREAS VALUED FOR THEIR FRAGILE CHARACTER AS HABITATS FOR PLANS, ANIMAL OR AQUATIC LIFE, OR HAVING ENDANGERED PLANT OR ANIMAL SPECIES, OR SPECIFIC NATURAL FEATURES, VALUED FOR THE NEED TO PROTECT NATURAL AREAS. 3.4.2 THE CITY SHALL: a. PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RABITAT ALONG STREAM CORRIDORS BY MANAGING THE RIPARIAN HABITAT AND CONTROLLING EROSION, AND BY REQUIRING THAT AREAS OF STANDING TREES AND NATURAL VEGETATION ALONG NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES AND WATERWAYS BE MAINTAINED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE; —15— b. REQUIRE '11HAT DEVE LOPMENI PROPOSALS IN DESIGNATED IlMbERED OR 1REE AREAS BE REOUIRED TO BE REVIEWED 1HR000H 1HL PLANNED DEVELOPMEN'1 PROCESS TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF 1REES REMOVED; AND �. REQUIRE CL.US'1ER 1YPL DEVELOPMEN'1 1N AREAS HAVING IMPOR'IANI WILDLIFE HABITAT VALUE AS DELINEATED ON THE "FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT MAP" ON FILE AT THE CITY. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall consider the inclusion of an adequate amount of land adjacent to a floodplain or drainageway for dedication to the City 's natural greenway system, which allows the area to continue to support existing habitats. 2. The City shall, encourage through the Planned Development Process, the retention of large, varied habitat areas on private and public lands including inventoried plant and animal communities. 3. The City shall review all development proposals adjacent to wildlife habitat areas to ensure that adverse impacts on any wildlife habitat areas are minimized, and if need be , request that other federal, state, and local agencies review the development proposals. 4. Where there exist large or unique stands of trees or major vegetation areas within the planning area on undeveloped land, the City shall ensure that development proposals do not substantially alter the character of the vegetation areas through the Planned Development Process and the "Tree Cutting" section of the Community Development Code. 3.5 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FINDINGS o In Tigard, public and private organizations can play an important role in providing leisure and recreational opportunities and cultural activities. o Many of the Tigard School District sites provide recreational needs not found within many of Tigard's parks. o Small parcels of unbuildable land resulting from urbanization can provide mini-parks or landscaped areas. o A properly planned and managed system of open space and recreation lands can reduce the impact of urbanization and serves the leisure and aesthetic needs of all residents. The system needs to recognize the relationship between urban uses and the natural character of the land and drainageways. 0 The community has indicated a desire for open space linkages which follow scenic routes and connect parks, schools, playgrounds, shopping areas, other public sites, and residential areas. -16- Mpg MM i b. REQUIRE THAI DEVELOPMEN'i PROPOSALS IN DESIGNATED IlM bERED OR 1REL• i AREAS BE REQUIRED -10 BF- REVIEWED 'THROUGH 1HE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 10 MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF 'TREES REMOVED; AND C. E2EQUIRE CLUSTER 1YPE DEVELOPMENI IN AREAS HAVING IMPORTANI WILDLIFE HAbITA1 VALUE AS DELINEATED ON THE "FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT MAP" ON FILE Al THE CITY. IMPLEMENTA1ION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall consider the inclusion of an adequate amount of land adjacent to a floodplain or drainageway for dedication to the City 's natural greenway system, which allows the area to continue to support existing habitats. 2. The City shall , encourage through the Planned Development Process, the retention of large, varied habitat areas on private and public lands including inventoried plant and animal communities. 3. The City shall review all dr.�lelopment proposals adjacent to wildlife habitat areas to ensure that adverse impacts on any wildlife habitat areas are minimized, and if need be, request that other federal, state, and local agencies review the development proposals. 4. Where there exist large or unique stands of trees or major vegetation areas within the planning area on undeveloped land, the City shall ensure that development proposals do not substantially alter the character of the vegetation areas through the Planned Development Process and the "Tree Cutting" section of the Community Development Code. 3.5 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FINDINGS o In Tigard, public and private organizations can play an important role in providing leisure and recreational opportunities and cultural activities. o Many of the Tigard School District sites provide recreational needs not found within many of Tigard's parks. i o Small parcels of unbuildable land resulting .from urbanization can provide i mini-parks or landscaped areas. o A properly planned and managed system of open space and recreation lands can reduce the impact of urbanization and serves the leisure and aesthetic needs of all residents. The system needs to recognize the relationship between urban uses and the natural character of the land and drainageways. o The community has indicated a desire for open space linkages which follow scenic routes and connect parks, schools, playgrounds, shopping areas, other public sites, and residential areas. -16- t o The City needs to develop an adequate system of open space, recreation lands, and facilities to retain and improve livability of the community. o In the process of planning for a park and recreation system, it is necessary to classify the individual components such as neighborhood parks and the greenway which will or could comprise the park system. In addition, the establishment of a reasonable acquisition and development program requires a listing of priorities and minimum levels of service to be provided. The actual development of such a system requires relating the provision of facilities and services to the particular needs and recreation desires of the residents to be served. POLICIES 3.5.1 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE PRIVATE ENTERPRISE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR OPEN SPACE, RECREATION LANDS, FACILITIES, AND PRESERVE NATURAL, SCENIC, AND HISTORIC AREAS IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF RESOURCES. 3.5.2 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS 1'0 DEVELOP RECREATIONAL FLCILITIES. 3.5.3 THE CITY SHALL DESIGNATE THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN OF FANNO CREEK, IT'S TRIBUTARIES, AND THE TUALATIN RIVER AS GREENWAY, WHICH WILL BE THE BACKBONE OF THE OPEN-SPACE SYSTEM. 3.5.4 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE AN INTERCONNECTED PEDESTRIANJBIKEPATH THROUGHOUT THE CITY. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Tigard Community Development Code shall require land divisions and major developments to set aside, dedicate land, or pay a fee in lieu of land aside based on standards, and the standards shall provide for: a. An area composed of developable lands which may provide active recreation space; and b. Adequate passive open space to protect natural resources at the j site and protect development form hazard areas. 2. The City shall permit land which is set aside within developments to remain in private ownership provided: a. Portions are sufficiently improved and maintained to offer active recreation opportunities; b. They do not interfere with the continuity of or access to adjacent greenway lands ; and C. Easements transferring development rights are dedicated to the public. -17- 3. The Tigard Community Development Code shall indicate flexible design options which mitigate the impacts of required open space and recreation land dedication or reservation. 4. The City shall designate natural park areas within a Tigard Master Parks Plan. The areas will have unique physical or aesthetic features and do not have to be developed to be of recreational use to the community. Areas which have special physical features such as natural watercourse, significant vegetation, scenic vistas, and that provide habitat for wildlife will be considered. 5. Open space and greenways shall be used to enhance the accessibility to schools and parks by establishing a safe and well-marked trail system which will also connect with significant regional trail systems. 6. Park classifications and standards shall be adopted and a program developed for acquisition and development of a park and open space system to ensure an adequate supply of usable open space and recreational facilities, directly related to the specific needs of the local residents. 7. Streets and drainageways shall be combined with a parkway or greenway concept to permit linkages between open spaces, residential areas, recreation lands , and centers of economic activity. 8. The City shall continue to seek assistance of volunteer groups to assist in developing and maintaining parks. 9. Master plans for each park shall be developed. These plans shall identify park facilities for each park and ensure that parks are developed so as to promote safe and aesthetically pleasing environments while minimizing the harmful effects of noise, air pollution, vehicular traffic , and other negative aspects of urban life. 10. The City shall continue to implement the adopted bike plan by requiring development adjacent to the Greenway to construct their portion of the bikepath system. 11. To augment the scenic benefit of the greenway, the City shall establish the major vehicular transportation routes as scenic or visual corridors. The Park Board should plan and initiate a program (through public and private cooperation) for corridor landscape preservation and/or improvement. 3.6 PARK STANDARDS FINDINGS o Currently, there are 128.80 acres of City park land in Tigard and 37.90 acres of dedicated greenway. o There are adopted plans for eight of the nine City parks. -18- o Although Scheckla Park has not been accepted by the Park Board , the land was dedicated to the City for park purposes. o Due to recent cut-backs in revenues to the City, the City has substantially limited its park maintenance program. 0 the City's Park System Development Charge is acquired through new development and is used solely for park acquisition, development or major capital acquisition. Park maintenance is paid for through the City's general fund. POLICIES 3.6.1 INDIVIDUAL PARK SITES, AS DEFINED BY THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE STANDARDS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING PRIORITIES: a. FACILITIES WITHIN A PARK WILL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THE NEEDS AND DESIRES OF THE DISTRICT RESIDENT'S AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE. PARK AND/OR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN GREATEST DEMAND AND LEAST SUPPLY SHOULD RECEIVE THE HIGHEST DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES. b. PARKS SHOULD BE PLANNED TO INSURE MAXIMUM BENEFIT TO THE GREATEST NUMBER OF LOCAL RESIDENTS. FOR THIS REASON, ACQUISITION AND t DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY LEVEL PARKS SHOULD BE GIVEN THE HIGHEST PRIORITY. C. DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WILL HAVE A LOWER PRIORITY FOR PUBLIC FUNDING AND ARE ENCOURAGED TO BE PROVIDED BY THE PRIVATE SECTOR WITHIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS AND MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS. d. NEW MINI PARKS HAVE THE LOWEST DEVELOPMENI PRIORITY AND SHOULD BE SUPPLIED AT THE DEVELOPER'S OR NEIGHBORHOOD'S EXPENSE AND MAINTAINED BY A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION CREATED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. e. PROVISION OF REGIONAL PARK FACILITIES WILL ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS AN INTERJURISDICTIONAL PROJECT; AND SHOULD HAVE A LOW PRIORITY UNLESS UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES ARISE. f. ACCEPTANCE OF ANY LAND DEDICATED FOR PARK PURPOSES SHALL BE BASED UPON ITS USEFULNESS AND ADAPTABILITY TO THE ADOPTED PARK AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM. 3.6.2 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH OTHER PUBLIC, PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS AND AFFECTED PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY'S ADOPTED PARK PLANS. t IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. Tha City shall continue to seek revenue sources to facilitate in the implementation of the adopted park plans. The adopted park plans are: -19- how Fanno Creek Park, Cook Park, Woodard Park, Jack Park, Sununerlake Park , Englewood Park, Liberty Park, and Ye Old Windmill Park. 2. The City shall develop a "future park needs assessment to determine the number of acres needed for future park uses. The current parte standards shall be used as a basis for this assessment. The future park need assessment will specifically address community park needs. 3. As a precondition to development , the City's Community Development Code shall require the dedication of the greenway and park land, if not already dedicated. 4. The City shall continue to implement the adopted pedestrian/bikepath pathway plans. 3. 7 HISTORICAL-CULTURAL RESOURCES Findings o Historic features provide a link with the past and add character and variety to the community design. Unfortunately, much of Tigard 's heritage has already been lost to unmanaged development with only a few distinct structures remaining. o The design of developments within the community can be regarded from two view points ; the design of structures as they relate to site and function (architectural design) , and their relationship to the surrounding area (community design). Both aspects are of equal importance. o Good architectural design is necessary to provide visual variety and allow for individual identity. At the same time, good community design provides a sense of unity with other development while eliminating conflicting appearances. POLICIES 3.7.1 THE CITY SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROMOTE THE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF HISTORICALLY AND CULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURE, SITE, OBJECTS AND DISTRICTS WITHIN TIGARD. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. To preserve the community's history, an index of historic sites shall be developed and made available to the general public. . A program shall be developed to acquire and/or restore a number of historic structures identified as significant. The City should consider the renovation of a historic structure as an historic museum or cultural center and meeting hall such as Durham School, Ye Old Windmill and John Tigard Home. -20- 4 AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY This chapter addresses the concerns expressed by Statewide Planning Goal alb which is "to maintain and improve the quality of the air, land and water resources of the state. " Environmental issues , throughout our ition and region, have produced an impressive list of agencies dealing 'I some aspect of our environment. Nationally, there is a confusing array of agencies , groups and departments , some working specifically in the realm of environment and many others who deal with environmental aspects only inasmuch as their main concern impinges on environmental areas of concern. The National Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) are two agencies devoted to measurement, control and understanding of our environments. In addition, there are others that devote only a portion of their efforts to environmental qualities, provide technical assistance, grants and guidelines to local or regional agencies. State and regional authority bring to bear more specific concerns and regulations regarding their jurisdictions , again with an impressive array of agencies and regulatory statements. Specifically impacting Tigard is the Metropolitan Service District (MSD) , which has responsibility for: air quality, water and solid waste treatment, regional land use coordination, transportati-on strategies and other areas of concern appropriate to an urban region. 4. 1 AIR QUALITY FINDINGS e Within the Tigard Planning Area there are no major point source air polluters. o The major source of air pollution in Tigard is automobile emissions. o The City of Tigard lies within the Portland-Vancouver Interstate Air Quality Maintenance Area (AQMA) . This area is described in the draft State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality, published jointly by the Department of Environmental Quality and the Metropolitan Service District in April, 1979. The draft State Implementation Plan (SIP) shows that the entire AQMA is in nonattainment for meeting the recently revised federal ambient air quality standards for ozone and is predicted to remain in nonattainment to at least 1987 unless additional control measures are undertaken. MSD and DEQ are developing a regional control strategy to bring the metropolitan area into attainment by 1987. o In the Portland - Vancouver AQMA, air pollution is monitored by and planning efforts coordinated through the Metropolitan Service District (MSD)and the Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) . -21- o The draft SIP also projects nonattainment in 1982 for CO (near Highway 99W). The City of Tigard is aware of these potential problem areas and will work with MSD to bpcter quantify the extent of these problems. POLICY 4. 1.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TIGARD'S AIR QUALITY AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS AND AGENCIES TO REDUCE AIR POLLUTIONS WITHIN THE PORTLAND-VANCOUVER AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE AREA. (AQMA) . b. WHERE APPLICABLE, REQUIRE A STATEMENT FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY, THAT ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS CAN BE MET, PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL. C. APPLY THE MEASURES DESCRIBED IN THE DEQ HANDBOOK FOR "ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ELEMENTS OF OREGON LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS" TO LAND USE DECISIONS HAVING THE POTENTIAL TO AFFECT AIR QUALITY. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall coordinate with MSD and DEQ to attain and maintain the air quality goal described in the State Implementation Plan (SIP). 2. The City shall continue to utilize expertise available at the Department of Environmental Quality, the Metropolitan Service District, and other relevant agencies, to coordinate efforts aimed at reducing air pollution emission levels in the Tigard and entire Portland Metropolitan Area. 3. Until such time as control strategies are realized, the City of Tigard shall use measures described in the DEQ Handbook for Environmental Quality Elements of Oregon Local Comprehensive Land Use Plans" when planning any development activities having the potential to directly (by direct emissions) or indirectly (by increasing vehicular travel) affect air quality. 4. The City shall make every effort to design municipal streets and roadways and to establish traffic flow patterns which minimize or reduce vehicular emissions. 5. The City shall consult and coordinate with r'-^ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality to ensure that lane use,,, and activities in Tigard comply with Federal and State air q: lity standards. 6. The City shall aim to reduce the quantity of vehicle emissions by pursuing an energy-efficient urban form which reduces the number of vehicle miles traveled, and by encouraging the use of alternate modes of transportation, especially mass transit and pedestrian. -22- �- 4.2 WATER QUALITY FINDINGS o The quality of Tigard's surface waters are fair, inasmuch as the waters are not used for drinking purposes. o No major point source water polluters threaten local creeks. o Some infiltration problems exist in the sewage systems. o Reduction of open space, removal of vegetation cover, and development which increases the amount of impervious surface contribute significantly to increases in the peak flows of urban storm runoff entering storm sewers, creeks and drainageways. o Offsetting measures can reduce the negative effects of urban development on water quality and quantity problems. Examples include on site retention/ detention of storm water, inclusion of landscape buffer areas adjacent to new development and conservation and improvement of streamside vegetation along creeks and other water courses. POLICIES 4.2.1 ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND REGIONAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. 4.2.2 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE AND ASSUME ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATING, PLANNING, AND REGULATING WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AS DESIGNATED IN MSD'S WASTE TREATMENT MANAGEMENT COMPONENT AND 208 CRAG STUDY. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. In order to improve the water quality and and quantity in the Tigard Area, the City shall consider developing regulations in the Tigard Community Development Code or instituting programs to: a. Increase public awareness of techniques and practices private individuals can employ to help correct water quality problems ; b. Improve the management of industrial and commercial operations to reduce negative water quality impacts; C. Regulate site planning for new development and construction through the Tigard Community Development Code to better control drainages and erosion and to manage storm runoff; d. Increase storage and retention of storm runoff to lower and delay peak storm flows; e. Reduce street related water quality and quantity problems ; and -23- i f. Increase public awareness concerning the use and disposal of toxic substances. 2. The City shall not permit industrial or other uses which violate State of Oregon water quality discharge standards. 3. the City shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Service District and other appropriate agencies to establish practices which minimize the introduction of pollutants into ground and surface waters. 4. The City shall require that new developments be connected to the City's or the Unified Sewerage Agency sanitary sewerage systems. 4.3 NOISE POLLUTION FINDINGS 0 Noise is a recognized cause of physical and psychological stress which has been directly related to various health problems. o Motor vehicle traffic noise is the major contributor to the ambient noise level in Tigard. o Noise levels for almost all residential districts in Tigard appear to be within acceptable levels. o The highest noise levels appear to be found along Pacific Highway (99W), Main Street, I-5, Hwy 217 and Hall Boulevard. o Effective control of the undesirable effects of highway generated noise levels requires a three part approach: 1) source emission reduction; 2) improved highway design and street design; and 3) land use controls. The first two components are currently being addressed by private industry and by federal, state and regional agencies. The third area is essentially a local government responsibility. POLICY 4.3.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS LOCATED IN A NOISE CONGESTED AREA OR A USE WHICH CREATES NOISE IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS TO INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING INTO THE SITE PLAN: 1. BUILDING PLACEMENT ON THE SITE IN AN AREA WHERE THE NOISE LEVELS WILL HAVE A MINIMAL IMPACT; OR 2. LANDSCAPING AND OTHER TECHNIQUES TO LESSEN NOISE IMPACTS TO LEVELS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES. b. COORDINATE WITH DEQ IN ITS NOISE REGULATION PROGRAM AND APPLY THE DEQ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM. -24- --�m p rmu..omaMmss. C. WHERE APPLICABLE REQUIRE A STAIEMENI FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY (PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE PROPOSAL) THAT ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS CAN BE MET. i IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Tigard Community Development Code shall ensure that future "noise sensitive" developments are designed and located so as to minimize the intrusion of noise from motor vehicle traffic and/or neighboring noisy uses. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code shall ensure that new , commercial, industrial and public developments are landscaped and designed such that Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) noise standards are met and neighboring "noise sensitive" properties are not negatively impacted by the new land use or associated activities. This shall be accomplished through building setbacks, buffering standards and use compatibility. i 3. The City shall seek a response and/or assistance from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) when reviewing coizunercial or industrial uses in or near residential areas to prevent degradation of previously quiet environments. 4.4 LAND RESOURCES FINDINGS o Solid waste disposal is a regional concern requiring regional solutions. �f I i o Land quality in Tigard is not currently threatened by a large - scale i waste disposal site. o Normal human activity and economic processes in Tigard contribute to the quantity of regional waste disposal. o The Metropolitan Service District (MSD) has the authority to provide solid and liquid waste disposal in the metropolitan area. o Although MSD has the authority over solid waste site location, local governments will be involved in the selection process. POLICY 4.4.1 THE CITY SHALL MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE, IF POSSIBLE, THE CURRENT QUALITY OF TIGARD'S LAND RESOURCES. 4.4.2 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE MSD'S RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY TO PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN. -25- IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall actively participate with the Metropolitan Service District (MSD) and the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) , in the solid waste site selection process. 2. The City shall discourage solid waste sites which would adversely I affect neighboring land uses or which are unsuitable because of natural conditions at the site, including but not limited to: a) Depth to water table I b) Soil conditions i c) Impacts upon drainage d) Water quality degradation or similar problems 3. The City shall ensure that future land use activities with significant waste and process discharges conform to all State and Federal environmental quality standards. 4. The City shall seek a response or assistance from the Department of Environmental Quality or any other interested State or Federal agency when reviewing proposed land uses with potential for significant waste and process discharges. 5. The City shall continue to use local recycling services and shall encourage and cooperate with all recycling agencies which conform to all state and federal environmental quality standards. 6. The City shall recognize MSD's role in preparing and implementing a solid waste management plan. The City shall support MSD's "Procedures for Siting Sanitary Landfill," and will participate in these procedures as appropriate. 5. ECONOMY Planning This report addresses LCDC Statewideg Goal #9 requirements titled "Economy of the State." The recommended findings and policies have been developed to blend Tigard's individual economic programs into those of the region and state to meet Goal #9 requirements. The Goal #9 statement reads: "to diversify and improve the economy of the state." "Both state and federal economic plans and policies shall be coordinated by the state with local and regional needs. Plans and policies shall contribute to a stable and healthy economy in all regions of the state. Plans shall be based on inventories of areas suitable for increased economic growth and activity after taking into consideration the health of the current economic -26- 1 L base; materials and energy availability ; labor market factors ; availability of renewable and non-renewable resources ; availability of land; and pollution control requirements. Economic growth and activity in accordance with such plans shall be encouraged in areas that have underutilized human and natural resource capabilities and want increased growth and activity. Alternative sites suitable for economic growth and expansion shall be designated in such plans. " FINDINGS Through analysis of the economic conditions which affect Tigard, the existing make up of the community, the potential for growth, and the City's interest in assisting existing and new businesses !: e:cpand in and relocate to Tigard, the j following findings were identified. o The City of Tigard is a sub-element of the Portland metropolitan economic region. o The economic climate of the City, in part, is subject to the influences of external economic forces beyond the control of the City. o The City continues to experience steady commercial and industrial growth despite the national and state economic situation. o A significant amount of commercial and industrial buildable land is available in areas where all services are provided making it suitable for development. o Manufacturing, wholesale and retail activities provide the majority of the employment opportunities to area residents. o An increasing regional dependence on electrical, electronic, and instrument related manufacturing employment has occurred in recent years. o There is a need for new and expanded public facilities to open areas for industrial and commercial uses. o Economic data, particularly that relating to sites available for development purposes, is largely unavailable or not kept up to date. } o A need exists to promote the benefits of operating a business in Tigard. o The Central Business District demands attention and community support in order that improvement programs may be set in motion to make it a more diversified and economically viable core area. o The existing railroad facilities in Tigard are an asset to industrial and commercial development on property adjacent to the rails. o Ease of access to 1-5 and Highway 217 serve as incentives to economic development in Tigard. i S t -27- o Tigard's proximity to Portland Community College provides opportunity for the creation of specialized job training programsto serve existing, City-expanding, and new industries in the 1 development in commercial districts can support agglomerations, help to minimize crime within the commercial districts, provide housing for senior citizens which is in close proximity to shopping areas, and minimize vehicular travel which would reduce pollution and conserve energy. o make o Aeed nexists erciallandsfor availablecfacility for economic evelopment developmenttindustrial and purposes comm ci i POLICIES i 5.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROMOTS TOIMT GARD RES DENTS ED AT THE DIVERSIFICATION ARTICULAR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE EMPHASIS PLACED ON THE GROWTH OF THE LOCAL JOB MARKET. TY AJACENT 5.1.2 THE CITY DEVELOP LANWOECONOMICRK WITH WADEVELOPMENTSHINGTON UNPLANNDINCORPORATING JURISDICTIONS SAICLOCAL TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 5.1.3 THE CITY SHALL IMPROVE AND ENHANCE THE PORTIONS OF HIGH CENTAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AS THE FOCAL POINT FOR COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, BUSINESS, CIVIC, AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY CREATING A DIVERSIFIED AND ECONOMICALLY VIABLE CORE AREA. I, 5.1.4 THE CITY SHALL ENSURE THAT NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USES. 5.1.5 THE CITY SHALL PROHIBIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS EXCEPT: COMPLEMENTARY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE PERMITTED ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND ABOVE THE SECOND FLOOR IN COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL DISTRICTS. (THE DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE R-20 DISTRICTS. ) 5.1.5 THE CITY SHALL CONSIDER PRIVATE FINANCING BY PRIVATE DEVELOPERS IN i COORDINATION WITH ZCOMMERCIAL AVAILABLE AND BONDING INDUSTRIALMETHODS LAND DPUBLIC ESIGNATED ON THE FACILITIES TO COMPREHEOSIVE PLAN MAP. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Code shall p 1. The City's Community Development wh ih may deter neweconomie activities. to remove unnecessary obstacles -28- i i 2. In the process of administering the City's Comprehensive Plan, careful consideration shall be given to the economic implications of all proposed policies, programs and regulations. 3. The City shall identify regional economic needs through interaction with officials of other Washington County jurisdictions and take appropriate action to adjust local policies to respond to their regional concerns and needs. 4. The City, along with the business community, shall develop an economic development program aimed at attracting new commercial and industrial development to Tigard while also encouraging the expansion of existing j business concerns. 5. The City shall participate in the formulation and implementation of a regional economic development program for the Washington County area. 6. The City shall work with the local business community to develop and maintain an up-to-date economic data resource file which will be made available to existing and potential Tigard business concerns. 7. The City shall work cooperatively with the business community seeking its involvement and advice when working toward arriving at decisions having economic implications for the business community. V 8. The City shall concentrate resources for the improvement and enhancement of the T.U.R.A. program aimed at revitalizing the CBD utilizing public funds and a program to encourage private investment. 9. The City shall establish a downtown revitalization plan which encourages new development by allowing more flexible zoning standards than allowed citywide while requiring review of all development proposals in the T.U.P.A. area for compliance with a revitalization plan. 10. The City shall develop and implement an economic development program compatible with the potentials and constraints of the City and will: a) Aid in the creation and maintenance of new and continuous employment opportunities to afford City residents the choice of working within the City; b) Strive to improve, diversify and stabilize the economic base of the community thus reducing the tax burden of the residential property owner; c) Aid in the effective utilization of the land, energy and human resources ; and d) Provide for the timely development of all public facilities and services and their delivery systems. 11. The City shall encourage the location and development of economic activities which meet the occupational and employment needs of all City [ residents, particularly the unemployed and underemployed. -29- 12. The Community Development Code shall limit development on lands planned for commercial use to commercial uses. Residential uses will be allowed above the first floor. 13. The City shall compile a document which identifies all parcels of land zoned for commercial or industrial purposes anti which identifies: a) The amount and type of development on the land, if any; b) The name of the owner; C) The public services which are available to the site; d) The current zoning designation; and e) The assessed value. 14. The City shall maintain development codes which describe standards for landscaping and buffering where commercial and industrial uses abut residential districts. 15. The City shall work with Portland. Community College to develop training programs as an incentive to new industries locating in Tigard needing a trained labor force. 16. The City shall coordinate its planning efforts with the Metropolitan Service District and Oregon Department of Transportation to ensure adequate access from major arterial routes to designated commercial and industrial areas. 17. The Tigard Community Development Code shall designate types of permitted residential development in C-N, C-P and CBD commercial districts. 18. The City shall encourage private landowners to consider utilizing available bonding methods, in addition to private financing methods, to provide public facilities to vacant buildable lands with the potential for industrial or commercial development. 19. The City should not preclude any financing mechanism for the implementation of its economic development objectives. 20. The City Council, upon the recommendation of its Economic Development Committee, shall develop objectives, criteria, and standards for determining its availability of bonding methods and use of bond proceeds for private, commercial and industrial development. 6. HOUSING 'this chapter considers the land and the dwelling units where Tigard residents live. Residential land uses occupy more land area than any other land use in the City. -30- This chapter addresses the Statewide Planning Goal #10: "To provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the state. " The plan policies focus on five basic areas: 1) Housing needs ; 2) Housing costs ; 3) Established residential areas ; 4) Housing condition; and 5) Urban Expansion. Detailed information concerning housing in Tigard is available in the "Comprehensive Plan Report: Housing." 6.1 HOUSING NEEDS FINDINGS o The residential housing in Tigard has been developed as 55.6% single family detached dwellings, 42.7% attached units, and 1.7% manufactured homes. o The Metropolitan Housing Pule adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission states that Tigard must provide for 50 percent sia-le family and at least 50 percent single family attached or multiple family units with a minimum of 10 units to the net acre. The Metro Housing Rule applies to only vacant buildable land within Tigard's Urban Planning Area, and does not affect established and developed residential areas. o The rapid increase in housing and land cost over the last several years has excluded many households from obtaining suitable housing to meet their needs. o Many of the households that do not desire or are unable to afford conventional single family detached dwellings rely on the rental market or atLcched dwellings to meet their housing needs. o The rapidly changing housing market will require the City to periodically to reevaluate its housing and land use objectives to provide for a variety of housing types and densities to meet the needs of future residents. o Approximately 19 percent of the households in Tigard are inhabitated by senior citizens. o Undue concentrations of public assisted or subsidized housing serves to isolate the recipients of such housing from the mainstream of the community, its full range of basic services and the diversity of its neighborhoods. For this reason, the City should take steps to disperse such housing within individual neighborhoods and throughout the City itself. POLICIES 6.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A DIVERSITY OF HOUSING DENSITIES AND RESIDENTIAL TYPES AT VARIOUS PRICE AND RENT LEVELS. -31- 6.1.2 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNITS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. TO PREVENT THE GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION OF PUBLIC HOUSING AND INSURE A BALANCE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF SUCH HOUSING, THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNITS LOCATED WITHIN ANY SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT SHALL BE FIVE TIMES THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH ON ANY STREET IN THE DEVELOPMENT. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS POLICY, THE TERM "SUBSIDIZED HOUSING" SHALL MEAN ANY HOUSING DEVELOPED OR CONSTRUCTED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY WITH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall monitor the rate of development through an annual "land survey, which will function as an up-to-date inventory of land available for future residential needs. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code shall list a broad range of development districts which allows for a variety of housing types, and complies with the adopted Metropolitan Housing Rule (50-50 mixture of single family and attached or multiple family at 10 units to the net acre on buildable vacant land). 3. The Tigard Community Development Code, through the Planned Development process, shall establish a procedure to allow properties exhibiting physical constraint characteristics, e.g. , steep slopes or floodplains, to develop with density transfers allowable on the site. No more than 25%G of the dwellings may be transferred. In addition, the City shall encourage developers to use the planned development process in all developing areas. 4. The Tigard Community Development Code shall allow for manufactured homes in manufactured home parks and subdivisions, within specified development districts. 5. The City shall encourage housing development to occur, to the greatest extent possible, on designated buildable lands in areas where public facilities and services can be readily extended to those lands. 6. The City shall provide for opportunities for proposals to develop specialized housing for the area's senior citizens and handicapped based on the needs of these groups by: a. Making information available on subsiding programs; b. Allowing special use housing for these groups in all development districts ; C. Requiring the needs of the handicapped to be considered as a part of the Site Design Review process. a. The City shall coordinate with the Washington County Housing Authority, H.U.D. and other Federal, State and regional agencies for the provision of subsidized housing programs in Tigard. -32- 6.2 HOUSING COSTS FINDINGS o The factors that have contributed to the increasing housing costs are materials, labor, land costs, financing and regulation costs. (The average sales price of a new single family home increased from $22,700 in 1970 to $45,000 in 1976, to over $76,000 in 1980. ) o Land and regulation costs have dramatically increased the cost of development. o Construction costs may be reduced by building smaller units and using alternative construction techniques. o Excessive regulation costs can be reduced by simplifying the application process and reducing unnecessary development standards. o Financing costs of residential units cannot be controlled by the City of Tigard; however, the City can assist in public facilities and services development through financing mechanisms. POLICIES 6.2.1 THE CITY SHALL DEVELOP CLEAR AND CONCISE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS TO FACILITATE THE STREAMLINING OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS, AND WILL ELIMINATE UNNECESSARY PROVISIONS WHICH COULD INCREASE HOUSING ! s COSTS WITHOUT CORRESPONDING BENEFIT. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall review, revise and update the land division, zoning and sign codes. The corresponding document will be grouped ir. a single code and identified as the Tigard Community Development Code. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code shall include clear and concise processes for the review and approval of development proposals, to the z degree that the quality of the review process is not adversely affected. This will be accomplished by, but not limited to: a. Administrative Procedures ; { b. Application forms ; and C. Clear and concise standards for each development process. k 3. The City shall seek ways to minimize the cost of housing by encouraging a variety of home ownership alternatives, such as, but not limited to, townhouses and condominiums. ' 4. The City shall continue to support the development of traditional E housing types such as single family detached dwellings, duplexes, and i apartments. c -33- 5. The City shall encourage geographic flexibility in the choice of housing. 6.3 ESTABLISHED RESIDEN'T'IAL AREAS FINDINGS o A major concern of the community is the viability of their established residential areas and the effect on these areas from change and growth. o Most of the City's residential areas are rated high quality and are expected to remain largely in their existing uses. o There are many existing residential areas that border large tracts of vacant , undeveloped land. o In some instances, due to development changing economies of supply and demand and subsequent changes in land use designations, some vacant areas might not be developed in the same manner as the established residential areas. o In order to retain the character of these areas and minimize adverse impacts of these areas, adequate standards need to be established for more intensive residential uses that border established residential areas. o As urbanization takes place, former vacant fields and hillsides are developed. The result is a dense land use pattern and numbers of unrelated types of adjoining land uses. Where these unrelated activities � come together, buffering, screening and transitional techniques can be i utilized to achieve a compatible relationship among uses. t o The intent of the plan is to use buffering, screening and transitional I techniques to: 1. Assure that private spaces are protected. 2. Assure that possible off site effects such as noise, glare lights and dust do not adversely affect adjoining land uses. 3. Preserve the character of established areas. 4. Lend visual interest and variety to the landscape. i 5. Enhance community identity. 6. Provide a transition between unrelated uses. POLICY 6.3.1 THE CITY SHALL DIRECT ITS LAND USE ACTIONS TOWARD THE MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL AREAS BY: -34- a. DESIGNATING ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP THE "ESTABLISHED AREAS" COMMITTED TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA. WITHIN THE "ESTABLISHED AREAS" NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OF THE SAME TYPE AND DENSITY IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE CHARACTER OF EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. 6.3.2 IN THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE A DENSITY TRANSITION WHEREBY INCREASED RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES ARE ADJACENT TO ESTABLISHED AREAS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: a. THE DENSITY WITHIN 100 FEET OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% OVER THE DENSITY SHOWN ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE ADJACENT LAND UNLESS THERE IS AN INTERVENING ROAD (MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL) IN WHICH CASE THIS PROVISION SHALL NOT APPLY. b. WHERE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ABUTS AN EXISTING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, THE HOUSING TYPES SHALL BE COMPATIBLE. FOR EXAMPLE: I 1. TATO HOUSING UNITS WHICH ARE ATTACHED ARE CONSIDERED COMPATIBLE WITH A DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY UNIT; BUT 2. MORE THAN TWO HOUSING UNITS WHICH ARE ATTACHED ARE N0 CONSIDERED COMPATIBLE WITH A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNIT. 6.3.3 IN ALL PHASES OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS IN A RESIDENTIAL "ESTABLISHED AREA," A PRIMARY CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY SHALL BE TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OF THE ADJACENT ESTABLISHED AREAS. is k IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Development District Map shall indicate those areas which are already "Established Areas". Establia::-�d areas are areas which have been determined to be developed and are as set forth on the "Development Standards Map". 2. The Community Development Code shall include the above transitional, buffering and screening requirements. 3. The transitional, buffering and screening requirements shall be i implemented through the design review process. 4. The City shall develop and adopt "locational criteria" for the placement of higher intensive uses. 5. Upon periodic plan review, the City shall maintain an updated map Ij showing "established" and "developing" areas. E ! F f f 6.4. DEVELOPING RESIDENTIAL AREAS FINDINGS s o There are numerous areas within the Tigard Urban Planning Area that are ? largely vacant and will eventually be developed for various uses. Most of these areas are along the outer edges of the City. a S -35- EERYd I o Development techniques and types have changed; and not all of these changes can be adopted to the existing rigid zoning ordinance standards. POLICY 6.4.1 THE CITY SHALL DESIGNATE RESIDENTIAL "DEVELOPING AREAS," (WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED AS "ESTABLISHED AREAS") ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP, AND ENCOURAGE FLEXIBLE AND EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THESE AREAS.. s I IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall establish locational criteria for higher intensity uses which at a minimum addresses their proximity to collectors streets, public transit, commercial areas and recreational facilities. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code shall include flexible development standards for "developing areas." 3. Within the Planned Development section of the Tigard Community Development Code: a. Development will be prohibited on lands not classified as developable as defined in OAR 660-07-140; b. Twenty-five percent of the number of units which could be accommodated on the undevelopable land may be transferred and placed on the developable land; however C. The transfer of the density shall be limited by 125% of the top of the range of the residential plan classification on the y developable portions of the site. 4. The Tigard Community Development Code shall also provide for a Planned Development process which encourages innovative design, more efficient use of land, energy efficiency and more flexible development standards. 6.5 HOUSING CONDITION FINDINGS o A majority of the City's existing units have been built since 1960; and in general, these units are in good condition. o Most of the upkeep on these structures involves minor mechanical problems, weatherization and painting. o The City currently does not have any rehabilitation programs for those residential structures that need major repairs. The Washington County ; Community Action Organization (WCCAO) does administer a weatherization program funded by the federal government to assist low income residents. -36- Other residents of Tigard may rely on federal and state tax incentives for weatherization, as those incentives are available. As many of the existing 20 year-old homes age, more repair and rehabilitation work may be i needed in order to maintain the high quality of residential structures II that now exist. POLICY I 6.5.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL HOUSING UNITS BE: a. CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE OREGON UNIFORM BUILDING CODE OR OTHER APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL STRUCTURAL CODES; AND b. MAINTAINED IN A MANNER WHICH DOES NOT VIOLATE THE CITY'S NUISANCE i ORDINANCE. i j IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Tigard Community Development Code will establioh a Site Design Review, Conditional Development and Planned Development process in which to review development proposals. 2. The City will continue to administer the Uniform Building Code on all applicable types of construction in Tigard. 3. The City will enforce, where financially feasible, all nuisance ordinances that relate to structure and site appearances. The City will encourage private property owners to comply with all nuisance ordinances which will alleviate the financial burden of the City, and its tax payers to enforce these ordinances. 4. The City will set reasonable rules in the Tigard Community Development Code for accessory buildings which will protect the character of existing residential neighborhoods. 6.6 ALL AREAS POLICY 6.6.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE: a. BUFFERING BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF LAND USES (FOR EXAMPLE BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES AND RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES) AND THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING THE TYPE AND EXTENT OF THE REQUIRED BUFFER: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THE BUFFER, FOR EXAMPLE TO DECREASE NOISE LEVELS, ABSORB AIR POLLUTION, FILTER DUST OR ZO PROVIDE A i VISUAL BARRIER. E -37- I s 2. THE SIZE OF THE BUFFER NEEDED IN TERMS OF WIDTH AND HEIGHT TO ACHIEVE THE PURPOSE. 3. THE DIRECTION(S) FROM WHICH BUFFERING IS NEEDED. 4. THE REQUIRED DENSITY OF THE BUFFERING. 5. WHETHER THE VIEWER IS STATIONARY OR MOBILE. b. ON SITE SCREENING OF SUCH THINGS AS SERVICE AREAS AND FACILITIES, STORAGE AREAS AND PARKING LOTS, AND THE FOLLOWING FACTORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING THE TYPE AND EXTENT OF THE SCREENING: 1. WHAT NEEDS TO BE SCREENED. 2. THE DIRECTION FROM WHICH IT IS NEEDED. 3. HOW DENSE THE SCREEN NEEDS TO BE. 4. WHETHER 1HE VIEWER IS STATIONARY OR MOBILE. 5. WHETHER THE SCREENING NEEDS TO BE YEAR ROUND. 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES The continued increased growth in population for the Tigard Planning area will require a :.:.=responding expansion of public facilities and services. Policies concerning the manner in which public facilities are expanded can help direct the location and intensity of future housing, commercial and industrial development. Statewide Planning Goal #11 specifically speaks to this concern. It directs jurisdictions "to plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangements of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban development. The findings, policies and implementation strategies of this chapter address general issues related to public facilities and services as well as issues concerning water, sewage disposal, police and fire protection, schools, health services and local government facilities to name a few. Detailed information related to public facilities and services is available in the 1°Comprehensive Plan Report: Public Facilities and Services," and a variety of facilities master plans and background reports developed by or for the City. -38- i 7.1 GENERAL FINDINGS o Community goals emphasize the desire to maintain the high quality of facilities and services within the City. o The community's facilities and services are an important management tool in the conservation and development of land within the urban planning area. o Plans and programs need to be developed for the expansion of urban services in a logical and orderly manner. This should include a funded and effective capital improvement program. o Phasing adequate public facilities and services to support residential development is necessary to meet community needs. o The City of Tigard and related service districts have the duty, within their means, to provide adequate services to meet the demand for all development within the planning area during the planning period. o Phasing the facilities expansion is necessary for orderly growth. o Formation of private utility districts (water, sewer) could create land management problems within the Urban Planning Area. o A capital improvements program would facilitate the coordination and expansion for providing transportation utilities and other public facilities. i POLICIES 7.1.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM IN CONJUNCTION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY AND THE APPLICABLE SERVICE DISTRICTS; b. WORK WITH THE SERVICE DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE A COORDINATED SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SERVICES; C. PROVIDE URBAN SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE EXTENT OF THE CITY'S FINANCIAL RESOURCES; d. USE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AS A MEANS FOR PROVIDING FOR ORDERLY GROWTH AND THE EFFICIENT USE OF LAND: e. DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH CONSIDERATION BEING GIVEN TO THE LEVEL AND CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING SERVICES; AND i i' f. ADOPT LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AS THE BASIS FOR MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT THE PROPER LOCATION FOR PUBLIC rACILITIES. j 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDI'T'ION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: -39- a. DEVELOPMENT COINCIDE WITH. THE AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE SERVICE CAPACITY INCLUDING: 1. PUBLIC WATER; 2. PUBLIC SEWER (NEW DEVELOPMENT ON SEPTIC TANKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CITY) ; AND I 3. STORM DRAINAGE. i b. THE FACILITIES ARE: 1. CAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SERVING ALL INTERVENING PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS. C. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. As a part of the ongoing planning program, the City will prepare a capital improvements program; and a. The staging of facilities will be based on the availability of financial resources; b. Priorities will be based on considerations of: 1) Health and safety factors ; 2) Cost-benefit factors; and 3) Social and economic needs. 2. As a part of the Community Development Code, standards will be I included in: a. The Land Division Ordinance for the construction of services; and b. The Community Development Code which requires future subdivision plans in areas where allowed densities due to a lack of services are less than the plan densities. 3. Where sewer is not available to site, the developer shall be required to extend the services to the site at the developer's cost. The City shall adopt an ordinance providing for partial cost as intervening parcels are developed by the intervening landowners. 4. The Tigard Community Development Code shall establish an ordinance which indicates: ! I -40- a. That services shall be extended from property line to property line, including services located in adjacent rights-of-ways ; except b. That the ordinance shall allow for the phasing of such services if a development proposal indicates such phasing. The intent of these policies is to develop a mechanism for an orderly and logical development and expansion of services to promote an efficient use of land and thus an efficient growth pattern. This mechanism will basically be concerned with: Planning for public facilities in advance of need in a manner which will implement land use policy. This shall help direct the urban expansion and growth. 7.2 STORM DRAINAGE AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT FINDINGS o The major drainage problem in Tigard is the storm-water runoff throughout the area. o The primary water quantity problem is overbank flooding that occurs when storm-water quantity exceeds channel capacity. o CH2M Hill, Inc. developed a "Master Drainage Plan" for the City in 1981, which incorporates existing storm-water detention and subdivision procedures and standards with the recommended changes to the existing floodplain management program. o There is an emphasis on the retention of a vegetation buffer along streams and drainageways to reduce runoffs and flood damage, and provide for erosion control. o Most of the following policies have been transformed into City regulations. POLICIES 7.2.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT THAT: a A SITE DEVELOPMENT STUDY BE SUBMITTED FOR DEVELOPMENT IN AREAS SUBJECT TO POOR DRAINAGE, GROUND INSTABILITY OR FLOODING WHICH SHOWS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS SAFE AND WILL NOT CREATE ADVERSE OFFSITE IMPACTS: b. NATURAL DRAINAGE WAYS BE MAINTAINED UNLESS SUBMITTED STUDIES SHOW THAT ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS CAN SOLVE ON-SITE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AND WILL ASSURE NO ADVERSE OFFSITE IMPACTS; C. ALL DRAINAGE CAN BE HANDLED ON-SITE OR THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION WHICH WILL NOT INCREASE THE OFFSITE IMPACT; d. THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION AS ESTABLISHED BY THE 1481 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY CONDUCTED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BE t PROTECTED; AND 4 -41- e. EROSION CONTROL TECHNIQUES BE INCLUDED AS A PART OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 7.2.2 THE CITY SHALL: a. INCLU'_"1E IN ITS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PLAN FOR SOLVING DRAINAGE PROBLEMS IN THE EXISTING DEVELOPED AREAS; b. RECOGNIZE AND ASSUME ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATING, PLANNING AND REGULATING WASTEWATER SYSTEMS AS DESIGNATED IN THE MSD WASTEWATER TREATMENT MANAGEMENT "208" PLAN; AND c. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO WASTEWATER. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City will include measures in this plan and in its implementation ordinances to reduce soil erosion. 7.3 WATER SERVICE FINDINGS o Both Tigard and Metzger Water Districts have made substantial capital improvements in recent years to provide the highest quality water at the most reasonable rates. o Reliable and adequate water supply, storage, and delivery systems are presently available or planned to provide sufficient quantities of high quality water to meet existing and future needs of the community. 0 The Metzger Water District has signed a 25-year water purchase contract for 100% of it's water. With the Tigard Water District entering into long term contracts with the City of Portland and the City of Lake Oswego citizens of Tigard can be assured of a long-term supply of high quality water. POLICIES 7.3.1 THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT AND THE METZGER WATER DISTRICT TO PROVIDE A HIGH STANDARD OF WATER SERVICE TO MEET FUTURE DEMANDS AT ALL TIMES. NOTE: For pre-conditions to development, see Policy 7.6.1. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City of Tigard shall take an active role in participating with the Tigard and Metzger Water Districts in making its views known on matters pertaining to water rates, tax rates, annexations, capital improvements, budgets, etc. -42- 2. When negotiating long-term water supply contracts, the City shall coordinate with the water districts in seeking rates and schedules that are equitable to all water users within the City. 3. If it appears in the best interests of the citizens to consolidate the water district and City operations, it shall be accomplished in an orderly manner with full and detailed consultation with the water districts involved. 4. The City of Tigard shall coordinate with the water districts, through a capital improvements program, to assure adequate water service for future urban development. 5. The Tigard Community Development Code shall require of developers the burden of proof for providing adequate water service prior to the approval and issuance of any development permits. 7.4 SEWER SERVICE FINDINGS o The availability of sewer lines is now the single most important public service controlling the direction and pace of urban growth. o In order to more efficiently use existing vacant land within the already developed area, the network of trunk sewer lines should be completed before there are any significant extensions to non-urbanized areas. o There are residents within Tigard Urban Planning Area that have or have had failing septic systems. The extent of the septic system failures and concomitant health hazard may be greater than is indicated by county records. As the area develops the pi�blem is bound to become more conspicuous. Local authorities (the City of Tigard, the Unified Sewerage Agency, and the Washington County Health Department) may not have the legal discretion to avoid this solution to the issue of failing septic systems. On the other hand, the potential hardship of enforcing these regulations on some property owners cannot be ignored. o The existing system by which septic tanks are monitored appears to have serious defects that need to be remedied. According to some soil scientists, for instance, the dye method of tracing septic tank contamination is inadequate. o Washington County's existing and proposed large-lot zoning designations in the Tigard Plan Area (and to the west on Bull Mountain) may permit septic systems that may fail. Developments in these areas should either be required to have public sewer service or have larger lot sizes than now allowed or envisioned. POLICIES 7.4.1 THE CITY SHALL: i 2 F -43- m i a. DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN THAT IDENTIFIES THE PRESENT AND FUTURE CAPACITY NEEDS FOR A SEWAGE SYSIEM IN THE PLANNING AREA, AND PROBABLE ROUTES OF FUTURE TRUNKLINES. b. REQUIRE THAT FUTURE EXTENSIONS OF COLLECTOR SEWER LINES SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY AND THE UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY (USA) . C. ADOPT A CLEAR AND CONCISE AGREEMENT WITH USA, IMPLEMENTING THE CITY'S POLICIES FOR EXTENDING THE AVAILABILITY OF SEWER SERVICES AND ENCOURAGING THE PHASING OUT OF SEPTIC TANKS. 7.4.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT AREAS DETERMINED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT OR THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TO HAVE FAILING SEPTIC SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM. 7.4.3 IN 1HE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SEWER SYSTEMS, PRIORITY SHALL: a. FIRST, BE GIVEN TO AREAS HAVING HEALTH HAZARD PROBLEMS WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED BY DEQ; AND b. SECOND, BE GIVEN TO AREAS WHERE THE COST-BENEFITS ARE THE GREATEST IN TERMS OF NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CONNECTIONS. 7.4.4 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT BE CONNECTED TO A SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Tigard Community Development Code will require that development permit applications demonstrate that adequate sanitary sewer collection and/or treatment capacity is available at the time the application is being made. The City may have approved or given previous commitments to development which effect the capacity of the existing system. These previous commitments shall be reviewed prior to additional hookups to that system. 2. The City will coordinate with the Unified Sewerage Agency (U.S.A. ) in the construction of new trunk and collector lines through both the City's and U.S.A. 's capital improvement programs. 3. The City will work with the Metropolitan Service District (MSD), and other affected agencies to formalize collections and treatment service area boundaries and to plan major waste water treatment facilities. The City recognizes and assumes its responsibility for operation, planning and regulating waste water systems as designated in MSD's Waste Water Treatment Management Component. i 4. Where the system capacity is limited, the City will reserve its remaining sanitary sewer system capacity to those areas within the city. -44- 5. Where the system is not limited, the City through its own lines and in cooperation with U.S.A. may provide collection and/or treatment services to unincorporated Washington County if line or system capacity exists in accordance with the City's annexation policies. 6. The City will coordinate closely with Washington County to prevent the installation of septic tank systems in areas where sanitary sewer services should be and are being planned for as part of either the City's proposed Comprehensive Sewer Plan or U.S.A. 's Capital Improvement Programs. 7. The City will monitor the inflow of storm water into the sanitary sewer system to ensure that unacceptable levels of infiltration are reduced. If necessary, a program will be initiated, to reduce the levels of infiltration. 8. The purpose of Policy 7.4.4 and related policies is to permit pre-existing development utilizing septic tanks or other landfill sewage disposal methods to continue to use such methods, until a charge of use occurs, a new main structure is erected, or until such methods are declared unlawful or hazardous by the agency having jurisdiction. For all development activity not utilizing sanitary sewer, the City may require a waiver of remonstrance to the future local improvement district for sewer facilities. gr 7.5 POLICE PROTECTION FINDINGS o As in other cities around the country, Tigard crime rates are increasing. e As the City of Tigard continues to grow there will be a continued need to increase police protection service. POLICIES 7.5.1 THE CITY SPALL COORDINATE EXPANSION OF POLICE PROTECTION, SERVICE AND FACILITIES WITH THE OVERALL GROWTH OF THE COMMUNITY. 7.5.2 AS A PART OF THE ONGOING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, THE CITY SHALL: a. REQUIRE VISIBLE IDENTIFICATION SIGNS TO ASSIST EMERGENCY VEHICLES IN LOCATING THE AREA OF THE PROBLEM; b. UTILIZE DEFENSIBLE SPACE CONCEPTS; AND C. REQUIRE THE TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT TO REVIEW DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS. IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES 1. As part of the Tigard Community Development Code, crime prevention provisions will be included in: -45- ME a. The Land Division section of the Tigard Community Development Code; and b. The Site Design Review, Planned Development and Conditional Development sections of the Tigard Community Development Code to include: 1) Requirements for visible identification signs to assist emergency vehicles in locating the area of the problem; 2) Defensible space concepts ; and 3) Provisions requiring the Tigard Police Department to review development permit applications. 2. Prior to approving or supporting an annexation proposal, the City will make certain that the proposed area can be adequately served with police protection. If the area cannot be served, the City will coordinate with the applicable police departw_-int to specify any corrective measures that would have to be taken by the City, police department, or persons proposing the annexation before the annexation takes place. 3. The nature and level of police services will be subject to coordinated monitoring by the City police department for evaluation and long-range planning. 4. The City will strive to reduce citizen fear of, and susceptibility to crime through increasing awareness of crime prevention methods in development, and involving the entire community in crime prevention programs. 7.6 FIRE PROTECTION FINDINGS o Currently, the City of Tigard is serviced by the Tualatin Rural Fire District and Washington County Fire District #1. o Continued growth and urbanization places additional need for fire related services. o Congestion on some area streets slows the response time to fires. Among locations where this has been noticed are: Vicinity of Greenburg & Tiedeman Pacific Highway Main Street Hall Boulevard between Commercial and Pacific Highway Walnut Street Tiedeman Railroad crossings at Hall Boulevard and Dain Street -46- ' During flooding, some bridges may be closed (e.g. at Grant Street on Hall Boulevard) n=cessitating the use of time consuming circuitous routes. o Subdivision plats can create access problems when there are too few through streets and too many dead ends. There are numerous examples of ar dead end streets throughout the City. POLICY 7.6.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT THAT: a. THE DEVELOPMENT BE SERVED BY A WATER SYSTEM HAVING ADEQUATE WATER PRESSURE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES; b. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT REDUCE THE WATER PRESSURE IN THE AREA BELOW A LEVEL ADEQUATE FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES; AND C. THE APPLICABLE FIRE DISTRICT REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City and private developers will coordinate with the applicable fire districts on all development proposals within the City. 2. Prior to approving or supporting an annexation proposal, the City will make certain that the proposed area can be adequately served with fire protection. If the area cannot be served, the City will coordinate with the applicable fire district to specify any corrective measures that would have to be taken by the City, fire district, or persons proposing the annexation before the annexation takes place. 3. The nature and level of fire services will be subject to coordinated monitoring by the City and fire districts for evaluation and long-range planning. 7.7 PRIVATE UTILITIES FINDINGS o Utilities such as natural gas, electric and telephone are provided by private utility agencies. o There is a need for development of a capital improvement plan to coordinate programs developed by public and private utilities. POLICY 7.7.1 COMMUNITY LAND USE PLANNING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH PRIVATE UTILITY AGENCIES TO ASSURE THE AVAILABILITY OF SERVICES WHEN NEEDED. -47- IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall work with all private utilities, public utilities , and other public agencies which work in public rights-o£-way (e.g. City and County public works departments) to ensure that each utility is provided with plans , programs, and schedules outlining any anticipated construction/reconstruction of public streets. 2. The Community Development Code shall provide for the review of such facilities (e.g. substations, receiving and transmitting towers , and other uses listed under Major Impact Utilities and Services) through the conditional development process. 7.8 SCHOOLS FINDINGS o The location and development of school facilities has a significant impact on residential development, transportation system location and development of public facilities and services. o Although the boundaries of the Tigard 23J School District extend beyond the Tigard Urban Planning Area, the location and function of district 's land uses has a major impact upon the Tigard Urban Planning Area. o Students in the northwest corner of Tigard attend the Beaverton School District #48. These irregular school district boundaries raise the following problems: 1. Families living in Tigard with children attending Beaverton schools must pay out-of-district fees for recreational services to either Tigard or Beaverton; and 2. Many of these same families often subscriber to the Valley Times in order to receive Beaverton School District news. The Valley Times does not, however, cover Tigard news especially related to public hearings and other related land use matters. o Schools have a major impact on future land use decisions. o Both existing and future schools can help define residential areas and serve as activity centers. o Historically, the school district and the City of Tigard have cooperated in the use of facilities. o State land use goals and guidelines require cooperation and coordination in land use decisions between the City and the school district. o Both of the school districts that serve Tigard are separate taxing districts and are not the responsibility of the City of Tigard government. -48- POLICY 7.8. 1 THE CITY SHALL WORK CLOSELY WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS 10 ASSURE THE MAXIMUM COMMUNITY USE OF THE SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR TIGARD RESIDENTS THROUGH LOCATION CRITERIA AND THE PROVISIONS OF URBAN SERVICES. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall monitor school capacity by requiring requests for development proposals and permits to be reviewed by applicable school district for effects on school capacity as a pre-condition to development. 2. The City shall coordinate with the school districts whereby each party is regularly informed of the others activities on short and long range planning; all issues of mutual interest, e.g. , school/park facilities ; and the financing and managing of those facilities. 3. The City shall develop "Locational Criteria" and will cooperate with the school districts in their efforts to select new school sites in order to assure adequate facilities and minimize conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The City shall support education and occupational training programs and when appropriate make selective resources of the City available to public agencies and private programs. 5. The City shall encourage the use of schools as an integral part of the community by making joint agreements with the school district to allow community uses of school facilities for recreation, open space, and meeting rooms. 7.9 HEALTH SERVICES Findings o Although there are care facilities with the Tigard Urban Planning Area, Tigard's primary health service needs are served by those facilities throughout the Portland Metropolitan area. o There are two major hospitals in close proximity to the City, St. Vincent's which is less than 15 minutes driving time and Meridian Park which is less than 10 minutes driving time. POLICY 7.9.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. ENCOURAGE COOPERATION BETWEEN LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AND PRIVATE AGENCIES IN PLANNING AND PROVIDING FOR HEALTH AND RELATED SOCIAL SERVICES; AND --49- o� b. PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE NECESSARY HEALTH SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE CITY THROUGH THE PROVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. As part of the Community Development Code: a. Hospitals will be permitted as conditional development in all residential and commercial development districts. b. Group care facilities will be permitted outright in medium, medium-high and high density residential districts and permitted as conditional development in low density residential districts. c. Medical offices and clinics will be allowed at least in commercial districts. 7.10 LOCAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES FINDINGS o The current space owned by the City for administrative offices does not meet the space needs of the City. Therefore, the City currently rents the needed space for administrative purposes. o The City has rented space in a building which is geographically centered in the community. POLICY 7.10.1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES SHOULD REMAIN CENTRALIZED IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 1. The City will continue to locate its facilities, when feasible, in a. location central to all residents of the City. 7.11 LIBRARY SERVICES FINDINGS o Current library facilities are inadequate. o Increased demands will require an expansion oL library facilities and service. -50- POLICY 7.11.1 THE CITY SHALL, WHERE ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE, PROVIDE FOR LIBRARY SERVICES WHICH MEET THE USER DEMAND OF ITS RESIDENTS. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall continue to work with the Library to provide adequate library services. 7.12 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING FINDINGS o Per capita generation of solid waste has been increasing. A considerable reduction of the level of solid waste disposed of in landfills can be effected by recycling, particularly through the use of source separation. o The recycling of solid waste conserves limited natural resources and energy. o The storage and disposal of hazardous substances are problems of increasing public concern. o The Metropolitan Service District (MSD) has been designated with the primary responsibility of finding a solution to the disposal of solid wastes, which is a regional problem. Metro maintains a regional solid waste management plan which is used to guide activities such as the search for new regional landfills and planning of solid waste transfer stations, resource recovery plants, and recycling programs. o Collection of solid wastes in the City is handled by private firms operating under mutually exclusive franchise granted by the City Council. o City policies and strategies regarding the solid waste management must include recognition of Metro's primary role in planning and coordinating solid waste disposal for the region and provisions which will help achieve the regional objectives of reducing the amount of wastes that need to be disposed of in sanitary landfills. POLICIES 7.12.1 THE CITY SHALL RECOGNIZE METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT'S (MSD) RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY TO PREPARE AND IMPLEMENT A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND WILL PARTICIPATE IN THESE PROCEDURES AS APPROPRIATE. -51- i 7.12.2 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ESTABLISH A PERMANENT, FULL-LINE RECYCLING CENTER THROUGH THE PROVISIONS OF TETE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE LOCATION SHOULD BE NEAR THE CENTER OF THE COMMUNITY AND SHOULD BE OPEN EVERY DAY. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City will promote the recycling of solid waste. Such measures may include giving financial incentive to solid waste collectors who recycle, and the establishment of an internal paper recycling program in City Hall and City Maintenance facilities. 2. The City will work with MSD and the State DEQ in adequately identifying the future needs for solid waste disposal in Tigard and Washington County. 8. TRANSPORTATION This chapter addresses Statewide Planning Goal #12: Transportation which requires local jurisdictions "to provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system." Transportation planning has been defined as ".. .the process by which transportation improvements or new facilities are systematically conceived, tested as to present and future adequacy, and programmed for future construction. Modern transportation planning emphasizes the total transportation system. It considers all modes of transport which are economically feasible to a state, region or urban area." (Goodman & Freund, Principals and Practices of Urban Planning, "Transportation Planning10) The transportation plan for Tigard reaches beyond the Tigard Planning Area and includes traffic and transportation impacts within other areas of the southwest subregion of the Portland Metropolitan Area. The Metropolitan Service District (MSD) acts as the regional coordinator for transportation planning throughout the Portland Metropolitan Area. The other inajor service district impacting Tigard is Tri-Met which is charged with the responsibility for providing public transportation throughout the metropolitan area. The Comprehensive Plan proposes a land use plan that encourages and facilitates balanced transportation development for the City. The plan recognizes that land use and transportation investments are inter-connected and that relationship should be reinforced to produce an acceptable urban environment. Detailed information concerning transportation in the Tigard Urban Planning Area is available in the "Comprehensive Plan Report: Transportation." -52- 8.1 TRAFFIC WAYS Findings: o A need exists to place all of the existing public local and collector streets in the Tigard City Limits under the City's jurisdiction. o According to a Washington County computer study 48-60% of Tigard residents work outside of the Washington County area. o Between 77-83% of Tigard residents commute to work by auto as single occupants. o Major congestion problems within the City have resulted from the rapid population growth since 1970, creating a need for major street improvements. o A corridor study for Pacific Highway (99W) has not been prepared by MSD. It is the only major trafficway within the region which has not been studied. Pacific Highway, the major trafficway through the City, has the highest traffic volumes, congestion and accidents rates within the City. There is a need to prepare a corridor study for Pacific Highway. The City, Metropolitan Service District and the State should coordinate such a study. t o Many of the streets in Tigard are dead-ended which adds to the congestion on existing completed streets. Therefore , a number of street connections need to be constructed. o A major concern of the community regarding transportation is the need to maintain and improve the livability of residential areas in the face of increasing population and transportation requirements. o The City needs to develop a strategy to coordinate public street improvements with private sector improvements to achieve the most effective use of the limited dollars available for road development and improvement. o The major residential growth during the planning period is expected to occur in the westerly and southerly areas of Tigard. Both of these areas lack adequate improved trafficways. o A need exists during the planning period to complete a collector street system between Scholls Ferry Road, Walnut Street, Gaarde Street, Bull Mountain Road and Pacific Highway. The location of these connections needs to be coordinated between the City, County, State and the Metropolitan Service District. o A need exists to complete the collector street system within the Tigard Triangle area to make more of this area accessible to developers, employers and employees. -53- POLICIES 8.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PLAN FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT STREET AND ROADWAY SYSTEM THAT MEETS CURRENT NEEDS AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. 8.1.2. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS WITHIN THE CITY AND THE METROPOLITAN AREA THROUGH COOPERATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, REGIONAL AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. 8.1.3 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. DEVELOPMENT ABUT A PUBLICLY DEDICATED STREET OR HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE APPROVAL AUTHORITY; b. STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED WHERE THE STREET IS SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH: C. THE DEVELOPER COMMIT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO CITY STANDARDS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT; d. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS PARTICIPATE IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING STREETS, CURBS AND SIDEWALKS TO THE EXTENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT'S IMPACTS; e. STREET IMPROVEMENTS BE MADE AND STREET SIGNS OR SIGNALS BE j PROVIDED WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT IS FOUND TO CREATE OR INTENSIFY A TRAFFIC HAZARD; x f. TRANSIT STOPS, BUS TURNOUT LANES AND SHELTERS BE PROVIDED WHEN THE PROPOSED USE OF A TYPE WHICH GENERATES TRANSIT RIDERSHIP; g. PARKING SPACES BE SET ASIDE AND MARKED FOR CARS OPERATED BY DISABLED PERSONS AND THAT THE SPACES BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ENTRANCE DESIGNED FOR DISABLED PERSONS; AND h. LAND BE DEDICATED TO IMPLEMENT THE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED PLAN. I IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall develop, adopt and implement a master street plan that f anticipates all needed trafficway improvements so as to plan for the necessary available resources to develop these streets when they are needed. 2. The City shall develop, maintain and implement a capital improvements i program which: i � I a. Is consistent with the land use policies of the Comprehensive Plan; b. Encourages a safe, convenient and economical transportation system; } -54- C. Furthers the policies and implementation strategies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; d. Considers a variety of transit modes within the rights-of-way; e. Meets local needs for improved transportation services ; f. Pursues and establishes other funding sources from the federal, state, regional and/or local agencies ; and g. Designates the timing of such projects to ensure their installation when those facilities are needed. 3. The City shall specify street design standards within the Tigard Community Development Code. 4. The City shall maintain the carrying capacity of arterials and collectors by reducing curb cuts and other means of direct access, and requiring adequate right-of-way and setback lines as part of the development process. The Community Development Code shall state the access requirements on each street classification. 5. The City's Tigard Community Development Code shall require developers of land to dedicate necessary rights-of-ways and install necessary street improvements to the City's standards when such improvements have not been done prior to the developer's proposals. These necessary dedications may be required upon approval of any development- proposal. 6. The City shall control and limit the number of access points and will signalize trafficways in a manner that provides for a consistent flow of traffic and therefore minimizes or reduces vehicular emissions. 7. The City shall include provisions in the Tigard Community Development Code which addresses the aesthetic quality of the transportation system to assure community livability and to minimize the effects on abutting properties. This can be accomplished through: a. Building setback requirements ; b. Requirements for landscaping and screening and through other site design criteria for visual enhancement; C. Limiting residential land uses along major arterial trafficways ; and d. Sign controls. 8. The City shall coordinate their planning efforts with adjacent cities and other agencies e.g. , Beaverton, Portland and Tualatin, Washington County, the Metropolitan Service District, Tri-Met and ODOT. 9. The City shall work out reciprocal agreements with other agencies for exchanging information pertinent to local transportation planning. -55- Ems 8.2. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FINDINGS o Since the oil embargos of the 1970's, the cost of motor feels have increased four fold. o The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met) is responsible for providing public transportation to the residents of Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas Counties. o Presently, there are four(4) bus lines that service the Tigard area. o Public transit offers the community an opportunity to reduce traffic and pollution as well as increase energy efficiency. o Work trips and shopping trips are most conducive to mass transportation. o The proposed downtown Tri-Met Tigard transfer center will increase service and lessen travel time for riders. POLICIES 8.2.1 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH TRI-MET TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA WHICH: a. MEETS THE NEEDS OF BOTH THE CURRENT AND PROJECTED, FOR THE TIGARD COMMUNITY: b. ADDRESS THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF TRANSIT DEPENDENT POPULATION; C. REDUCES POLLU T-nN AND TRAFFIC; AND d. REDUCES ENERGY CONSUMPTION. 8.2.2 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE THE EXPANSION AND USE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY: a. LOCATING LAND INTENSIVE USES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO TRANSITWAYS; b. INCORPORATING PROVISIONS INTO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE TRANSIT FACILITIES; AND C. SUPPORTING EFFORTS BY TRI-MET AND OTHER GROUPS TO PROVIDE FOR THE NEEDS OF THE TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall request Tri-Met to extend service to areas within the City that do not currently have service. 2. In the City's Community Development Code, the City shall require large developments to provide transit facilities e.g. , pull-offs and shelters, if such developments are located adjacent to transit routes. -56- 3. The City shall coordinate with Tri-Met in the development of the proposed transfer center in downtown Tigard. 4. The City shall propose land use densities, within the Comprehensive Plan, along transit oriented corridors that support public transportation service. 5. The City shall work with Tri-Met and other transit providers to encourage transit service for the transit dependant population e.g. the poor and handicapped. 6. The City shall encourage its citizens to use mass transit systems, where possible, to make greater effectiveness of the transit system while reducing automobile usage. 7. The City shall coordinate with the transit providers to encourage car-pooling and investigate if there is a local need for car-pooling in the Tigard area. 8.3. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE DISADVANTAGED FINDINGS o Tri-Met is responsible for providing handicapped transit accessibility including coordination of special transit services by social service agencies. o Tri-Met conducts the detailed special handicapped transit planning necessary to identify required service improvements and adopt a plan for meeting federal requirements for handicapped accessibility. POLICY 8.3.1 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY, TRI-MET AND OTHER REGIONAL AND STATE AGENCIES IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND ACCOMMODATION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 1. The City shall require, through the implementation process, that parking spaces be set aside and marked for disabled persons parking, and that such spaces be located in convenient locations. 2. The City shall continue to coordinate with the appropriate agencies in the identification and accommodation of those individuals with special `• transportation needs. i i f i e f� P -57- ��as® 8.4. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE WAYS FINDINGS o As the City of Tigard continues to grow, more people may rely on the bicycle and pedestrian pathways for utilitarian, as well as for recreational purposes. o In 1974, the City Council adopted a Comprehensive Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway Plan. o The City has required adjacent development to install that portion of the bicycle/pedestrian pathways shown on the adopted plan which abuts the development. 0 the City has implemented portions of the adopted plan through the City's overlay program. o The adopted Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan provides for a dual function pathway system; bicycles and pedestrian use the same system. POLICY 8.4.1 1HE CITY SHALL LOCAIE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS IN A MANNER WHICH PROVIDES FOR PEDESIRIAN AND BICYCLE USERS SAFE AND CONVENIENT MOVEMENT IN ALL PARTS OF THE CITY, BY DEVELOPING ThE PATHWAY SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE ADOPTED PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY PLAN. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall review each develop:atnt request adjacent to areas proposed for pedestrian/bike pathways to ensure that the adopted plan is properly implemented, and require the necessary easement or dedications for the pedestrian/bicycle pathways. 2. The City shall review and update the adopted Pedestrian/Bikeway Plan on a regular basis, to ensure all developing areas have accessibility to the Pedestrian/Bikeway system. 3. The City shall coordinate with Washington County to connect the City's Pedestrian/Bike Pathway system to the County's system. 4. The City codes include provisions which prohibit motor driven vehicles on designated and maintained pedestrian/bicycle pathways. 8.5. RAILROAD FINDINGS o Tigard is serviced by Southern Pacific and Burlington Northern railroad lines which carry strictly freight through the City Limits. -58- o Within the downtown area each railroad company has its own trackage and the usage of those lines is based on railroads ' needs. o In the adopted Tigard Urban Revitalization Area Plan it is stateu that there should only be one set of railroad tracks traversing the downtown area. the City is in the process of discussing this issue with both railroads. o Many of the commercial and industrial businesses within Tigard rely on the railroads for the shipping and receiving of goods. o The City is currently coordinating the upgrading of all the railroad crossings within Tigard with the railroads. POLICIES 8.5.1 THE CITY SHALL COOPERATE WITH THE RAILROADS IN FACILITATING RAIL FREIGHT SERVICE TO THOSE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUSINESSES WITHIN THE CITY THAI DEPEND ON RAILROAD SERVICE. 8.5.2 THE CITY SHALL COORDINATE WITH BOTH SERVICING RAILROADS TO IMPLEMENI THE ADOPTED TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL AREA (T.U.R.A. ) PLAN. IMPLEMENTATING STRATEGIES 1. The City shall continue to coordinate with the Southern Pacific and Burlington Northern railroads to provide adequate railroad service. 2. The City shall designate adequate commercial and industrial land within close proximity to existing railroad service lines to ease railroad accessibility to those businesses that rely on the service. 3. The City shall coordinate with the railroads to combine the trackage within the downtown area and facilitate the implementation of the T.U.R.A. Plan. 9. ENERGY Statewide Planning Goal #13, Energy Conservation, requires localities to manage and control land uses and development so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy, based on sound economic principles." The following policies accomplish the objectives of the goal but they are not written at the level of detail necessary to provide the community with a comprehensive energy program. However, the potential need for such a program is becoming increasingly evident as the cost of energy supplies increases and the availability of nonrenewal energy sources decreases. The increasing cost of energy compiled with the fact that most localities are importers of energy s t t -59- could potentially have a negative impact or, local economies. The impacts could range from work stoppages or slowdowns to reduced disposable incomes and a disruption of monies within the local economy. The energy findings , policies and implementation strategies identify conservation as the initial energy source that the community should explore. They do so based on the fact that conservation is the cheapest energy source, most readily available, least environmentally detrimental and most influenced by local policy. Additional information on this topic is available in the "Comprehensive Plan Report: Energy." FINDINGS o Transportation and residential uses account for approximately half of the total energy consumption in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Industrial and commercial uses comprise the other half of energy consumption. o The City of Tigard has no developed energy sources. o Conservation of energy at the local level is best achieved through programs aimed at energy efficient transportation modes and land use patterns , reducing travel distances between residential and work areas, infilling vacant land, increasing densities of land uses as a whole and encouraging alternative energy uses. o All forms of nonrenewable energy sources used today are finite and the cost of these sources have increased as the supply has decreased. o A reduction in the coiranunity-wide use of nonrenewable energy sources and the development of renewable energy resources would have beneficial impacts on both local and national economy. o Mass transit systems can have a positive influence upon energy consumption but require higher density corridors and activity areas to be effective. o The availability of cheap energy in the past has resulted in the construction of residential and commercial buildings that are energy inefficient. Weatherization and insulation of existing and new structures would substantially reduce energy consumption for heating and cooling these structures. o Although it is a widely used substitute for traditional energy sources, woodburning stoves can have adverse effects on air quality if improperly used. o Alternative architecture and site design considerations can affect energy consumption; such as structure orientation to the sun, landscaping, topography and adjacent structures. o Small scale wind generating devices may be a viable alternative energy source for Tigard residences. -60- o The private automobile consumes about 75% of all petroleum used in transportation in the Portland Area. POLICIES 9.1.1 THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE A REDUCTION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY INCREASE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION AND THE PRODUCTION OF ENERGY FROM ALTERNATIVE SOURCES. 9.1.2 THE CITY SHALL ESTABLISH A BALANCED AND EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WHICH COMPLEMENTS THE LAND USE PLAN AND IS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE ENERGY IMPACTS. 9.1.3 T11F CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT WHICH EMPHASIZES SOUND ENERGY CONSERVATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall encourage public and private programs that offer weatherization and energy conservation programs, e.g. tax credits , low-interest weatherization loans , etc. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code shall allow for a variety of housing unit types in most residential development districts which have proven to be energy efficient , e.g. , common-wall or clustering of dwelling units. i 3. The City shall locate higher densities and intensities of land use in proximity to existing and potential transit routes specifically with convenient access to federal and state highways, arterials and major collector streets. 4. The City shall, in the Tigard Community Development Code, allow for more flexibility in structure siting to provide for maximum solar exposure. e 5. The City shall review the feasibility of implementing a solar access ordinance and wind generation provisions. 6. The City shall cooperate with both public and private agencies that make use of site development and architectural techniques using natural elements for heating and cooling in all developments. 7. The Tigard Community Development Code shall allow for mixed use developments which will support a reduction in traffic trip generation. 8. The City shall coordinate with and support public and private planning efforts that advocate alternative forms of transportation such as mass transit , carpooling, ride share, bicycling and walking for commuter purposes. 9. Locational criteria shall be established to minimize vehicular travel in order to conserve energy. I F 10. URbANIZAIION This chapter addresses the concerns expressed by Statewide Planning Goal # 14: Urbanization, which is "to provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use." The Urbanization goal is important because it develops a framework within which all development activities have to be coordinated, and it integrates and balances all of the other available land resources in terms of the needs expressed by other goals ; namely Housing, Economy, Public Facilities and Services, Natural Features and Open Space and 'transportation. The urbanization goal also requires an allocation of land for accommodation of urban expansion during the planning period (1980 - 2000) , and development of plans to arrange the orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable load, in Tigard use, to urban land. The findings, policies and implementation strategies address a variety of topics related to urbanization. Policies describe the process which satisfy the need for efficient, orderly and logical urbanization within the geographical limits of Tigard's Urban Planning Area. Additional information on this topic is available in the "Comprehensive Plan Report": Urbanization. FINDINGS o The City of Tigard has grown from 5,302 people in 1970 to 14,286 people in 1980 (Census 1970 & 1980) and the City predicts that Tigard will continue to grow to more than double its current size by the year 2000. The current 1982 population is 17,444. A portion of this i :rease is due to annexations. o The City limits have expanded by approximately 4.4 square miles since 1970, to its present size of approximately 8 square miles. o All lands within the Tigard Urban Planning Area as well as the City Limits have been designated for urban land uses, and are wholly within the Portland Metropolitan Area Urban Growth Boundary. o The Tigard Comprehensive Plan is an active plan, meaning the City plans and designates land uses within the Tigard Urban Planning Area (T.U.P.A. ). Washington County retains legal jurisdiction over development proposals, zoning and public improvement projects outside the City limits but within the T.U.P.A. Tigard does have right of review and comment on proposals and projects within the T.U.P.A. o The area within the Tigard Urban Planning Area, but outside the current City Limits, that is not already developed to urban intensities will be made available for urban uses via an Urban Planning Area Agreement between the City of Tigard and Washington County, annexation to the City and subsequent development proposals by the property owners. -62- I providing urban level services , or the I o The City is committed to p g � coordination of providing these services with the appropriate service districts , to all areas within the city limits boundaries. o The intent of the City is to provide for an orderly and efficient land use I pattern and urban services which must be available at the time of t development. o The timing, location, and expansion of the transportation systems are i important factors affecting future urbanization. o The desired development and growth pattern for the Tigard Urban Planning j Area is to be defined by a growth management system, e.g. extension of services , streets and land use, which will guide the timing, type, and location c,l growth. o To assist in the financing of street facilities and improvements, Tigard has imposed a Systems Development Charge (SDC) on new housing development. o Major trunk line sewer service in the Tigard Urban Planning Area is provided by the Unified Sewei Agency (USA) of Washington County which has assumed this responsibility for the City's, as well as eastern Washington County, major sewage system since 1970. o Water in the Tigard area is provided by the Metzger and Tigard Water Districts. These districts purchase their water from Portland, Lake Oswego and other sources. i o An Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) between Tigard and Washington County regarding land use planning and annexation has been adopted since 1980. The City and the County are now in the process of renegotiating j this UPAA. The intent of this agreement is to: a. Identify the urbanizable land within each jurisdiction surrounding Tigard; b. Provide for orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable land to urban land; C. Provide a process for reviewing the land use designations between the City and County; d. Provide for a process to extend existing services; and e. Provide a process for annexations to the City. o The City does not have an UPAA with the school districts (Tigard and Beaverton), but the districts do work with the City's Planning and Development Department to estimate the enrollment impact of new residential development in the City. o The City has made a significant effort in the past to manage the location and type of growth, and to coordinate this growth with the extension of services and expansion of facilities. -63- o The City is currently in the process of including all of the "unincorporated islands" within the city limits. 10.1 ANNEXATION OF LAND POLICIES 10.1.1 PRIOR TO THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF TIGARD: a. THE CITY SHALL REVIEW EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SERVICES AS TO ADEQUATE CAPACITY, OR SUCH SERVICES TO BE MADE AVAILABLE, TO SERVE THE PARCEL IF DEVELOPED TO THE MOST INTENSE USE ALLOWED*, AND WILL NOT SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE LEVEL OF SERVICES AVAILABLE TO DEVELOPED AND UNDEVELOPED LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TIGARD. THE SERVICES ARE: 1. WATER; 2. SEWER; 3. DRAINAGE; 4. STREETS; 5. POLICE; AND 6. FIRE PROTECTION * Most intense use allowed by the conditions of approval, the zone or the Comprehensive Plan. b. IF REOUIRED BY AN ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ORDINANCE, THE APPLICANT SHALL SIGN AND RECORD WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY A NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT REGARDING THE FOLLOWING: 1. THE FORMATION OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (L.I.D.) FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING SERVICES THAI -OULD BE PROVIDED THROUGH SUCH A DISTRICT. THE EXTENSION OR iMIROVEMENT OF THE FOLLOWING: a) WATER; b) SEWER; c) DRAINAGE; AND d) STREETS; 2. THE FORMATION OF A SPECIAL DISTRICT FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE SERVICES OR THE INCLUSION OF THE PROPERTY INTO A SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE SERVICES. C. THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE URBAN SERVICES TO AREAS WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA OR LITH THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY UPON ANNEXATION. -64- l 10. 1 .2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED LAND ANNEXATIONS BY THE CITY SHALL bE BASED ON FINDINGS WITH RESPECT '10 THE FOLLOWING: a. THE ANNEXATION ELIMINATES AN EXISTING "POCKET" OR "ISLAND" OF UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY; OR b. THE ANNEXATION WILL NOT CREATE AN IRREGULAR BOUNDARY THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR THE POLICE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARCEL 1S WITHIN OR OUTSIDE THE CITY; C. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS COMMENTED UPON THE ANNEXATION; d. THE LAND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AND IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY BOUNDARY. e. THE ANNEXATION CAN BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE SERVICES LISTED IN 10. 1.1(b)(2). 10. 2 EXTENSION OF SERVICES OUTSIDE THE CI'1Y LIMITS POLICIES g� 10.2. 1 '1HE CITY SHALL NOT APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF CITY OR UNIFIED SEWERAGE ' AGENCY (USA) LINES EXCEPT: a. WHERE APPLICATIONS FOR ANNEXATION FOR THOSE PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY; OR b. WHERE A NONREMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT TO ANNEX THOSE PROPERTIES HAS BEEN SIGNED AND RECORDED WITH WASHINGTON ^*iNTY AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY; OR C. WHERE THE APPLICABLE STATE OR COUNTY HEALTH AGENCY HAS DECLARED THAT THERE IS A POTENTIAL OR IMMINENT HEALTH HAZARD. 10.2.2 IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF POLICY 10.2.1, THE EXTENSION OF SEWER LINES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY UNITS SHALL NOT REDUCE THE CAPACITY BELOW THE REQUIRED LEVEL FOR AREAS WITHIN THE CITY. 10.2.3 AS A PRECONDITION TO THE APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION OF SERVICES OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS, THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF REVIEW FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS OUTSIDE THE TIGARD CITY LIMITS BUT WITHIN THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA (REFERENCE TIGARD'S URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENTS WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY). THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT: a. PRELUDE THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTIES TO URBAN DENSITIES AND STANDARDS; OR b. PRECLUDE THE SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. -65- THIS REVIEW SHALL INCLUDE 1HE FOLLOWING FACIORS AS SET FORTH IN THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPROPRIATE IMPLEMENIATING ORDINANCES: a. LAND USE; b. DENSITY; C. PLACEMENT OF STRUCIURES ON 1HE SIZE; d. STREET ALIGNMENT; AND e. DRAINAGE. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall encourage all of the urbanizable land within ligard's Urban Planning Area to be within the City Limits. 2. The City shall direct its annexation policies to conform with and support the City 's Comprehensive Plan. 3. The City shall phase annexations to allow for the incorporation of urbanizable land in a manner that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the Urban Planning Area Agreement, and to provide for orderly transition in urban services. 4. The City shall work toward establishing a workable, jointly approved growth management agreement with the Washington County. The agreement shall assure that: a. Urban development inside Tigard Urban Planning Area (T.U.P.A. ) will be encouraged to annex to the City of Tigard. b. Significant differences between City/County Comprehensive Plan policies are reconciled for the unincorporated areas within the Urban Planning Area (T.U.P.A.). 5. Land use designations, if not already designated, shall be assigned to purposed annexation areas only after a thorough study addressing statewide Planning Goals, City and neighborhood needs have been completed and adopted by the City. 6. The City shall accept, encourage, and assist in the preparation of annexation proposals of all levels with its Urban Planning Area (UPA). 7. The City shall actively seek to include all "unincorporated island" areas into the city. 8. The City shall provide a capital improvement plan (CIP) that will promote the development of services and facilities in those areas which are most productive in the ability to provide needed housing, jobs and commercial service opportunities in conformance with the -66- policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The CIP shall emphasize the provision of needed services in established districts and those areas passed over by urban development. 9. The City shall cooperate with Washington County and all special discricts share in the exchange of information on planning actions which have interjurisdictional impacts. Ample opportunity for review and comment shall be given prior to final action by a city, county or special district policy making body on a matter of mutual concern. 10. The City and County will negotiate the existing Urban Planning Area agreement which responds to the needs of both the City and County. POLICY 10.3.1 THE CITY SHALL CONSIDER ANNEXATION REQUESTS OUTSIDE THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AND WITHIN THE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES 10. 1 AND 10.2 AND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY. 10.3.2 THE CITY SHALL DISCOURAGE EXPANSION OF THE TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA IN A MANNER WHICH WOULD RESULT IN AN IRREGULAR PLANNING AREA AND INEFFICIENT PROVISION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES. 11. SPECIAL AREAS OF CONCERN The p-rpose of til.; chapter is to address those areas within each Neighborhood Planning Organization that are of special concern to each particular area. This chapter is divided by Neighborhood Planning Organization. The subsequent policies address a broad range of issues and relate directly to the main City-wide policies in Chapters 1-10. The larger, bold number adjacent to each policy refers to the City-wide policy of Chapters 1-10. 11.1 Neighborhood Planning Organization #1 A. CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FINDINGS o The downtown area contains a broad mix of land uses, meeting the needs of many people within the planning area. o A major concern of the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain existing business in the downtown area, and expand the economic potential of the downtown area. -67- --MIM o The Central Business District is the major commercial area in the planning area, and it provides professional, governmental, financial, and cultural services. It also provides entertainment and open space. o The City of Tigard has an adopted Tigard Urban Revitalization Area (T.U.R.A. ) plan for the downtown area. o To successfully operate as a unified area, a Central Business District needs to: a. Be compact; b. Have ease of access to all facilities; C. Have a broad cross section of appropriate commercial uses ; d. Have adequate free parking in proximity to shopping; and o The Tigard downtown area is effectively served by mass transit facilities. POLICY 11.1. 1 THE REDEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN SHOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ORDER TO MAKE IT COMPLEMENTARY TO NEWER SHOPPING AREAS. CONVENIENCE, APPEARANCE AND THE NEEDS OF THE SHOPPING PUBLIC SHOULD BE PRIMARY CONSIDERATIONS. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall continue to implement the adopted Tigard Urban Revitalization Area (T.U.R.A. ) Plan in accordance with the City's economical capabilities. 2. The City shall coordinate and cooperate with the private sector to promote their participation in the implementation of the T.U.R.A. plan. B. ASH AVENUE FINDINGS o The extension of Ash Avenue is expected to increase traffic from the downtown area to the adjacent neighborhood; thus potentially increasing the adverse impacts upon the adjacent neighborhood. o Improvements to adjacent street, e.g. Hill, O'Mara, etc. can alleviate traffic impacts on Ash Avenue. POLICY 11.2.1 ASH AVENUE SHOULD BE EXTENDED ACROSS FANNO CREEK, ENABLING ACCESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS COMMERCIAL AREA WITHOUT USING PACIFIC HIGHWAY. DESIGN FEATURES SHALL BE USED TO SLOW TRAFFIC AND MAKE THE STREET AS -68- SAFE AS POSSIBLE. ASH AVENUE SHALL BE DESIGNATED A MINOR COLLECTOR IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE S1REE1 PLAN. DESIGN FEATURES AND MITIGATION MEASURES SHALL HOLD TRAFFIC VOLUMES TO THE MIDDLE LIMITS OF A MINOR COLLECTOR. 11.2.2 IMPROVEMENTS TO S.W. ASH AVENUE FROM S.W. HILL TO FANNO CREEK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS CONDITION OF DEVELOPMENT OF AD.7ACENT PROPERTIES. THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS ALONG WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MAJOR COMMERCIAL SITE WILL INCREASE TRAFFIC ON ASH. A BARRICADE SHALL BE PLACED AT HILL STREET APPROXIMATELY AT THE END OF EXISTING PAVEMENT TO PROTECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS FROM THE COMMERCIAL. TRAFFIC. 11.2.3 METHODS OF MITIGATING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHALL INCLUDE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER OF IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION: a. IMPROVING S.W. MCDONALD STREET TO INTERIM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS TO ENCOURAGE TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH OF MCDONALD TO USE MCDONALD TO EXIT TO HALL AND/OR PACIFIC HIGHWAY. b. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF ASH FROM HILL TO FREWING. THESE IMPROVEMENTS COULD INCLUDE LIMITED PARKING, DELINEATION OF TRAFFIC LANES AND SIDEWALKS ON ONE OR BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET. C. THE EXTENSION OF S.W. HILL TO S.W. O'MARA AND/OR THE IMPROVEMENT OF S.W. ASH FROM FREWING TO GARRETT. d. THE EXTENSION OF S.W. O'MARA 10 S.W. HILL PARALLEL TO S.W. ASH. e. REMOVAL OF THE BARRICADE IN PLACE ON ASH AVENUE AT S.W. HILL. f. IMPROVEMENT OF S.W. O'MARA STREET TO INTERIM MAINIENANCE STANDARDS TO ENCOURAGE AN ALTERNATE ROUTE. g. INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC INHIBITORS TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF ASH IF AND WHEN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXCEED THE MIDDLE RANGE FOR A MINOR COLLECTOR. TRAFFIC INHIBITORS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO PLANTING ISLANDS, SPEED BUMPS, BUTTONS, TURNING RESTRICTIONS, LOAD LIMITS AND ENFORCEMENT. 11.3 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #3 Many of the older residential neighborhoods in NPO #3 were developed along country roads that were lightly traveled, but which are now more heavily traveled. Some of this increased traffic results from local development, and some of it is through traffic which must use these roads since no arterial route has been built. Further increased in traffic, and consequent widening of these roads, may adversely impact the quality of the residences along these roads. This is particularly the case with 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street, which have right-of-ways of 40 to 50 feet that are offset in some places. -69- The comprehensive plan for NPO #3, adopted by the City of Tigard in 1975, supported and implemented the conclusions of Carl Buttke, the consulting engineer who performed the traffic studies for the various NPOs. These conclusions were that 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street should be developed as two lane roads limited to a total of 30 feet "to avoid motorists from forming a third land, but providing sufficient roadway width for turning vehicles." The 1975 plan included provisions for these roads to have pedestrian-bicycle paths, and to have restrictions on parking. Also, low densities were planned for the neighborhoods serviced by these streets ; one reason was to avoid further overloading of these streets with additional traffic resulting from higher densities. The City of Tigard, in the 1975 plan for NPO #3, opposed a proposed Murray Boulevard Extension through NPO #3. It has been the opinion of both the City and the local residents that the Murray Boulevard Extension to Pacific Highway should be located to the west of Bull Mountain. Completion of this arterial linkage could remove much of the through traffic from what should be neighborhood collector streets. FINDINGS o The development along most of the collector streets in NPO #3 is predominantly low density residences which are in good condition. o The present right-of-way along much of S.W. 121st Avenue and S.W. Gaarde street is 40 to 45 feet wide, with offsets in some places. Widening these streets to major collector standards would impact some of the existing homes on these streets. o Some of the traffic now using S.W. 121st Avenue and Gaarde Street is no local, but rather through traffic, which could be better provided for by a properly located arterial connection between Murray Boulevard and Pacific Highway. o Future development on the land along 121st and Gaarde will add to the traffic volumes on those streets. o S.W. Gaarde Street and S.W. 121st Avenue south of Walnut both have many uncontrolled access points ; this condition will require special design attention when street improvements are made. o A direct connection between Murray Boulevard, or Scholls Ferry Road, and Gaarde Street and/or 121st Avenue has been proposed many times in the past. A direct arterial connection proposal was considered in detail in the 1975 NPO #3 Plan and was emphatically rejected by the City of Tigard. It has also been rejected by the current NPO #3. POLICY 11.3.1 THE CITY SHALL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING WHEN PREPARING STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS THAT AFFECT S.W. 121ST AVENUE OR GAARDF. STREET. -70- a. THE: IMPACT ON 'I HE EXISIING RESIDENIIAL STRUCTURES AND THE ALIERNAIIVE'S WHICH HAVE "1HL MINIMUM ADVERSE EFFECI IN PERMS OF: 1. REDUCING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE DWELLING AND THE STREET; AND 2. NOISE IMPACIS. b. THE EFFECT THE IMPROVEMENT WILL HAVE ON THE TRAFFIC FLOW AND THE POSSIBLE NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OTHER STREET INTERSECTIONS. C. MINIMIZING THE USE OF THESE STREET AS PART OF THE ARTERIAL SYSTEM FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. S.W. Gaarde Street and S.W. 121st Avenue (between Gaarde and Walnut) shall be developed as two-lane roads with pedestrian-bicycle paths, restricted parking and left turning lanes as needed at intersections. 2. The undeveloped land along S.W. 121st Avenue (south of Walnut) shall be planned for development in accordance with the locational criteria policies that apply to locating medium and higher densities close to arterials and in accordance with the policies for "Established" and 11Developing" areas. 3. The City of Tigard shall work with other governmental bodies for the development of an arterial route connection from Murray Boulevard or Scholls Ferry Road to Pacific Highway. This arterial route should be located west of Bull Mountain, and should not utilize roads which pass through existing residential areas within Tigard. 4. The Tigard Community Development Code shall require site design review for any development other than a single or two family structure. The site design review shall include review of street right-of-way and pavement location. 11.5 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #5 FINDINGS o As Tigard has continued to develop the locational advantages associated with the the I-5 freeway, Highway 217 and the two railroad lines traversing the area have led to a considerable amount of office and industrial development along 72nd Avenue, south of Highway 217. o The established residential area abutting the industrial area in NPO #5 has been adversely affected by the individual use, due to increased smoke, noise, odor or visual pollution. o The polution of existing vegetation and trees, and the planting of trees, provide an excellent means to both separate and buffer residential areas from industrial areas. These vegetative buffers exist along the western i i s` -71- slopes bordering the Rolling Hills Subdivision and along Fanno Creek. The Rolling Hills Subdivision abuts industrially planned land on two sides and is within approximately 600 feet of land planned for heavy industrial use. POLICY 11.5.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE BUFFERING AND SCREENING BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND ADJOINING INDUSTRIAL AREAS AS A PRECONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AS FOLLOWS: a. ALL BUILDINGS ON INDUSTRIAL LAND SHALL BE SET BACK A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE WHICH ABUTS A RESIDENTIALLY PLANNED AREA; b. THE SITE PLAN SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE LEAST INTENSIVE PROPOSED USES ON THE SITE IN THE AREAS WHICH ABUT AN ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED AREA; AND C. BUFFERING AND SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE 50-FOOT SETBACK AREA AS PROVIDED BY THE STANDARDS CONTAINED IN POLICY 6.3.3. IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SUBSECTION TO REQUIRE THE ENTIRE FIFTY FEET TO BE LANDSCAPED PROVIDED THE STANDARDS IN 6.3.3 ARE MET IN WHICH CASE A PORTION OF THE BUFFER AREA MAY BE USED FOR PARKING; EXCEPT 1. NO STRUCTURE, PAVEMENT OR DEVELOPMENT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE 50-FOOT SETBACK AREA SURROUNDING THE ROLLING HILLS SUBDIVISION; AND 2. ALL EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE RETAINED AND MAINTAINED WITHIN THE 50-FOOT SETBACK AREA SURROUNDING THE ROLLING HILLS SUBDIVISION. r IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The City shall work with the Neighborhood Planning Organizations and the e affected property owners (both residential and industrial) in developing a design plan for the buffer areas between industrial and residential areas. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code shall include a tree cutting section which will minimize the cutting of trees on undeveloped land, and prohibit the cutting of trees within the designated Fanno Creek Greenway area. 3. The Community Development Code shall include standards for industrial developments that abut residential districts. At a minimum these standards shall include height, noise, and lighting requirements. -72- i' 12. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA INTRODUCTION This section contains locational criteria policies with respect to: o Housing o Commercial uses o Offices o Industry o Public utilities and facilities The policies and locational criteria apply to both legislative and quasi-judicial land use actions. Conformance of quasi-judicial land use actions with this section of the Comprehensive Plan shall be determined by evaluation of the ralationships between the proposed action (e.g. , zone change, conditional development) and the applicable locational criteria. The applicable criteria are determined by the scale of the proposal, measured according to the scale standards found in the charts which follow. It is intended that these locational criteria be construed in a flexible manner, in the interest of accommodating proposals which, though not strictly in conformance with the applicable criteria, are found to be in the public interest and capable of harmonious integration into the community. The burden of proving conformance of the proposal to the Comprehensive Plan should vary with the degree of change and impact on the community: the more drasti-c__the change and the greater the impact, the more strictly the criteria should be construed. 12.1 RESIDENTIAL The allowed housing types will be determined by the locational criterias, allowed densities and Community Development Code provisions related to each zoning district. POLICY 12.1.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR HOUSING DENSITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH: a. THE APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. b. THE APPLICABLE LOCATION CRITERIA. C. THE APPLICABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISIONS. -73- gill The following criteria will apply to the four residential densities. 1. Low Density Residential. A. The following areas designated low density residential on the plan map. (1) Areas which are committed to low density development and not shown on the "buildable lands inventory" as vacant land. (2) Areas where street facilities are limited to collectors and local streets. (3) Areas having development limitations due to the topography, soil characteristics, drainage, high water table or flooding. (4) Areas with limited capacity for development in terms of facilities and services such as: (a) Facilities: i Sewer ii Water iii Drainage iv Schools (b) Services: i Police ii Fire iii Health B. The following factors will be determinants of the density ranges allowed through zoning in the low density residential. (1) Areas which have been historically developed with large lots and which are determined to be committed land "on the buildable lands inventory" will remain zoned consistent with the existing development pattern. (2) The capacity of facilities and services. (3) Areas within walking distance of transit should 'be zoned for smaller lots. (4) Areas within close proximity to jobs, commercial areas and public facilities and services should be zoned for smaller lots. 2. Medium Density Residential A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for medium density on the plan map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. -74- 4 (2) Areas which have direct access from collector or arterial streets. (3) Areas which are not subject to development limitations such as topography, flooding, poor drainage. (4) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for i additional development. ! i (5) Areas within one half of a mile of public transportation. i (6) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established low density residential areas. B. The following factors will be determinants of density ranges allowed through zoning in the medium density planned area: ; (1) The density of development in areas historically zoned for medium density development. (2) The topography and natural features of the area and the degree 9f possible buffering from established low density residential areas. (3) The capacity of the services. l (4) The distance to the public transit. (5) The distance to neighborhood or general commercial centers and office business centers. (6) The distance from public open space. 3. Medium—High and High Density Residential i A. The following factors will be the determinants of the areas designated for high density on the play. map: (1) Areas which are not committed to low density development. (2) Areas which can be buffered from low density residential areas in order to maximize the privacy of established ' low density residential areas. (3) Areas which have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. (4) Areas which are not subject to development limitations. (5) Areas where the existing facilities have the capacity for additional development. (6) Areas within, one quarter mile of public transit. i i -75- MIN J1LPW-4LPWW--AKM-- (7) Areas within one quarter mile from neighborhood and general commercial shopping centers or business and office centers. (8) Areas adjacent to either private or public permanent open space. B. The following factors will be determinants of the density ranges allowed in the medium-high and high density planned areas should the city adopt more than one high density zone. (1) The topography and natural features of the area and the degree of possible buffering from established low density residential areas. (2) The capacity of the services. (3) The distance from public transit. (4) The relationship of the site to existing neighborhood and general commercial centers and office and business centers. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. The Community Development Code shall: a. Include a broad range of resia—tial districts. b. Provide for schools, churches, parks and other quasi public and public uses as conditional development in the residential districts. C. Require medium density, medium-high density, and high density I residential uses to be subject to the design review process, unless those developments have received detailed planned development or conditional development approvals. i d. Require medium density and high density residential developments to I provide a minimum of 20% of the gross area to be landscaped. The landscaping requirement may be reduced during the review process where it can be demonstrated that exceptional design will achieve: (1) An equally desirable development. (2) An uncluttered appearance and openness intended by the landscaping requirement. e. Require the dedication of land or monetary contribution to the public for parks or recreation facilities. 12.2 COMMERCIAL The Comprehensive elan provides for four types of commercial development: ercial areas, professional commercial and neighborhood, linear (general) comm the central business district. It is the intent of plan that- i 1. Commercial areas be planned at a scale which relates its location, site I and type of stores to the trade area to be served. 76- 2. Surrounding residential areas be protected from any possible adverse affects in terms of loss of privacy, noise, lights and glare. 3. Commercial centers and uses be aesthetically attractive and landscaped. 4. Ingress and egress points not create traffic congestion or hazards. 5. Vehicle trips be reduced both in terms of the length of vehicle trip and total number of trips. 6. The central business district is not included in the locational criteria because there is only one designated areas. POLICY 12.2.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. PROVIDE FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE TYPE OF USE, ITS SIZE AND REQUIRED TRADE AREA. b. APPLY ALL APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES. C. APPLY THE APPROPRIATE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE OF THE PROJECT. 1. Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood commercial centers are intended to provide convenience goods and services within a cluster of stores. Convenience goods are goods which are brought frequently, at least weekly, and for which people do not engage in comparison shopping. The uses pezz.i.tted in the neighborhood center included convenience markets, beauty shops, barber shops and repair shops. The range of uses is limited to those uses which can be sustained by a limited trade area. A. Scale (1) Trade Area. Up to 5000 people. (2) Site Size. Two acre maximum. (3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies. B. Locational Criteria (1) Spacing and Location (a) The service area radius for a neighborhood commercial center shall be at least one half of a mile. (b) Commercial development shall be limited to one quadrant of a street intersection or where there is no street intersection, to one side of the street. 4 -77- M AM (2) Access (a) The proposed center or expansion of an existing center shall not: (i) Be located at a dangerous intersection or create a dangerous intersection. (ii) Create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. uch a determination shall be based on the street capacity, existing and projected traffic volumes, the speed limit, number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of the most intensive use allowed in the zone. (b) The site shall have direct access from ore of the following: (i) An arterial. (ii) A collector street which will not direct traffic through local neighborhood streets. (3) Site Characteristics. The site shall be of a size which can accommodate the present and future uses, but shall not exceed two acres. (4) Impact Assessment (a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. (b) The site configuration and characteristics and relationship to the street system shall be such that privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be maintained. (c) It shall be possible to incorporate the unique features into the site design and development plan. (d) The associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere with adjoining non-residential uses. 2. Linear Commercial Linear Commercial areas are intended to provide for major retail goods and services. The uses classified as linear commercial may involve drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale and repair services or provide services to the traveling public. The uses range from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments. it is intended that these uses be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. A. Scale (1) Trade Area. Varies -78- (2) Site Size. Depends on development. (3) Gross Leasable Area. Varies. B. Locational Criteria (1) Spacing and Location (a) The commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides. (2) Access (a) The proposed area or expansion of an existing area shall not: (i) Be located at a dangerous intersection or create a dangerous intersection. (ii) Create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination shall be based on the street capacity existing and projected traffic volumes, the speed limit, number of turning movements and the traffic generating characteristics of the various types of uses. (b) The site shall have direct access from a major collector or arterial street. (c) Public transportation shall be available to the site or general area. (3) Site Characteristics (a) The site shall be of a size which can accougz.--jate present and projected uses. (b) The site shall have high visibility. (4) Impact Assessment (a) The scale of the project shall be compatible with the surrounding uses. (b) The site configuration and characteristics shall be such that the privacy of adjacent non-commercial uses can be maintained. (c) It shall be possible to incorporate the unique site features into the site design and development plan. (d) The associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere with adjoining non-residential uses. 1/ 3. Professional office Commercial Professional office commercial areas are intended for a diverse range of office uses and supportive uses; and to promote user convenience throughout the City. -79- A. Scale (1) Trade area. Varies (2) Site size. Varies (3) Gross leasable area. Varies B. Locational Criteria (1) Spacing and Location (a) The Comprehensive Plan map fixes exact boundaries of the professional office commercial area. (b) The professional office commercial area is not surrounded by residential districts on more than two sides. (2) Access (.a) The proposed use or expansion of an existing area shall not: (i) Be located at a dangerous intersection or create a dangerous intersection. (ii) Create traffic congestion or a traffic safety problem. Such a determination shall be based on the street capacity, existing and projected traffic volumes, the limit,speed turning movements eneratingcharacter sticsof the gvarious types of uses. g (3) Site Characteristics (a) The site shall be of a size which can accommodate present an projected needs. (b) The site shall have high visibility. (4) Impact Assessment ics shall be such that (a) The site con faacent non-commercial raon and ruses can be maintained. the privacy of adjd, (b) It shall be possible to incorporate the unique site features into the site design and development plan. (c) The associated lights, noise and activities shall not interfere with adjoining non-residential uses. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES l� The Community Development Ordinance shall: a. Include a neighborhood commercial district, a general commercial district, a highway commercial district, and a professional office commercial district area. -80- b. Require that: (1) The areas be subject to site design review. (2) A minimum of 15% landscaping be provided. (3) Necessary street improvements be made prior to development. C. Prohibit single family residential uses in the neighborhood commercial and general commercial centers. d. Allow for residential uses above the first story of commercial uses except professional office commercial districts. Residential uses would be permitted above second story in professional office commercial districts. 2. As a part of the corridor study proposed for Pacific Highway (99W) by the Oregon Department of Transporation and the Metropolitan Service District, the City shall: a. Review the commercial development patterns that have occurred along Pacific Highway and look at ways to reduce access points along Pacific Highway; and b. Develop ways to consolidate new commercial development into commercial centers rather than strip commercial areas. 12.4 INDUSTRIAL The intent of the Industrial land use designation is to: 1. Provide for the designation of suitable lands for industzial use. 2. Provide for economic growth and development. 3. Protect existing and potential lands suitable for industrial development from encroachment by non—industrial or incompatible uses. 4. Provide land for industrial use by type to minimize the impact on surrounding development. 5. Take advantage of existing transportation facilities. industrial lands are classified as: 1. Heavy Industrial Lands which are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing and assembling activities. Uses within this classification are characterized by large buildings and large storage areas and as having associated external effects such as smoke, noise, odor, or visual pollution. 9 -81- 2. Light Industrial Lands are areas intended to provide for manufacturing, processing, assembling and related office activities. Uses within this classification are of a size and scale which snakes them generally compatible with other non-industrial uses and which have no off-site effects. The land use map designates specific areas of the city for industrial development. Over time, however, there may be a demand for new sites. Therefore, the following policy will apply in making such decisions. POLICY 12.4.1 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE THAT: a. SITES FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: (1) SEPARATED BY TOPOGRAPHY ESTABLISHED BUFFERS, TRANSPORTATION OR OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES FROM RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED AREAS. (2) LOCATED IN AREAS HAVING RAIL SERVICE, ARTERIAL OR MAJOR COLLECTOR ACCESS. b. SITES FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE: (1) BUFFERED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ASSURE THAT PRIVACY AND THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA ARE PRESERVED. (2) LOCATED ON AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREET AND THAT INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE CHANNELED THROUGH RESIDENTIAL AREAS. C. THE SITE SHALL BE OF A SIZE AND SHAPE WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR THE SHORT AND LONG RANGE NEEDS OF THE USE. d. THE LAND INTENDED FOR DEVELOPMENT SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE SITE TOPOGRAPHY OF LESS THAN 6% GRADE, OR THAT IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THROUGH ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES ALL LIMITATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES CAN BE MITIGATED. e. IT BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ASSOCIATED LIGHTS, NOISE AN OTHER EXTERNAL EFFECTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ACTIVITIES AND USES ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. f. ALL OTHER APPLICABLE PLAN POLICIES CAN BE MET. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. Industrial development adjacent to existing or planned residential areas shall be conditioned to ensure that: a. The specific proposed use will be compatible with adjacent uses. -82- ANA b. The design of the facility and its site will not place visual or physical burdens on the surrounding areas. C. The operational characteristics of the facility will be compatible with surrounding uses and includes consideration of: (1) Hours of operation; (2) Delivery and shipping characteristics; (3) Noise; (4) Lighting; and (5) Other use characteristics. 2. The Community Development Code shall include the following provisions: a. A planned industrial park zoning district which will include development provisions which provide for: (1) A basic street and utility pattern which will permit flexibility in the size of industrial sites. (2) A circulation system that provides direct access to arterials or collectors that will not channel traffic through residential areas. (3) An internal circulation system which connects to adjoining sites. (4) A complete set of pre-imposed restrictions (e.g. deed restrictions, restriction covenants, etc. ) that are enforceable upon all occupants of the inddstrial parte_ including provisions for site improvement, building design, landscaping, sign controls off-street parking and site maintenance. 1 (5) Evidence of continuing management responsibility to enforce restrictions established under the original development plan. r (6) Recognition of the differing transportation requirements of employees and service vehicles with adequate provision for public transit access. E (7) A minimum of 25% of landscaping. b. Design review provisions which apply to industrial development. C. Use classifications which exclude residential uses from industrial areas as primary uses. -83- or 12.5 COMMUNITY UTILITIES AND FACILITIES Public utilities and facilities include public and private activities which are owned and operated for the benefit of the public. These include, for example, schools, libraries, hospitals, parks, golf courses, police and fire stations, water service, sewerage facilities and other operations performed as a public service. These facilities and uses have a direct effect on the public health, safety and welfare. They must be located in a manner which maximizes the net gains to the public and relates to the service area. The purposes of this plan section are to: 1. Provide services where and when appropriate; 2. Locate community utilities and facilities where appropriate access and required services can be achieved; 3. Support community identity and development of community centers ; 4. Reduce auto trips by clustering public services with other related commercial, office and industrial uses ; 5. Minimize adverse impacts on adjacent development through site location and design guidelines ; and 6. Promote reduced crime potential through design and location based on the principles of defensible space. POLICY 12.5.1 THE CITY SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE LOCATION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES IN A MANNER WHICH ACCORDS WITH: a. THE APPLICABLE POLICIES IN THIS PLAN; b. THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE SCALE AND STANDtADS OF THE USE. -84- �rss� The following list of uses are examples for each category defined under this section. Minor Impact Utilities & Facilities Medium Impact Utilities & Facilities o Minor Impact Utilities o Admin. Service Use o Tax Lots & Neighborhood Parks (Gov't Services) o Utility Poles & Lines, Fire o Community Parks Hydrants, Bus Shelters o Golf Courses o Cultural Exhibit o Grade Schools o Library Services o Water Storage o Lodges, Fraternal & C4ric Assembly o Telephone Co. Switching Station o Middle Schools o Power Substation o High Schools o Trade Schools o Religious Assembly High Impact Utilities & Facilities o Transit Station (within CBD) o Postal Services o Community Clinic Facilities o Fire Station o Cemetery o Ambulance Services o Recycle Center o Transit Station (outside CBD) Major Impact Utilities & Facilties o Community Recreation o Hospitals o Major Impact Services & Utilities o Land Fill 1. Minor Impact Utilities and Facilities A. Locational Criteria (1) Access (a) Access to a (minor impact, utility or facility) may be from a local street provided: (i) Site access will not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion, considering the roadway capacity, existing and projected traffic counts, speed limits and number of turning movements. (z) Impact of the Proposed Change on Adjacent Lards (a) The use shall be allowed provided: (i) Associated lights and noise will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties; -85- (ii) Large scale construction and parking lots can be buffered from the adjacent uses ; (iii) Privacy of adjacent residential developments can be maintained; (iv) Community identity can be maintained through design and site layout which blends the structure into the residential character of the area; and (v) Buffering can be used to screen the project from adjacent uses. (3) Site Characteristics (a) The use shall be allowed provided: (i) The unique natural features, if any, can be incorporated into the design of the facilities or arrangement of land uses ; (ii) The land intended for development has an average site topography of less than 25% grade, or it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques, all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. (NOTE: This does not apply to parks. ) (iii) The site is of a size which can accommodate the present and future uses and is of a shape which allows for a site layout in a manner which maximizes user convenience and energy conservatio:. 2. ;II-:�ium Impact Utilities and Facilities A. Locational Criteria (1) Access (a) There is direct access from the site to a collector street and traffic will not be routed through local neighborhood streets. (b) Site access will not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion considering the roadway capacity, existing and projected traffic counts, speed limits and number of turning movements. (c) There is public transit within one-quarter mile of the site. (2) Impact of the Proposed Change on Adjacent Lands (a) it is compatible with surrounding uses, considering scale, character and use. -86- (b) It will reinforce orderly and timely development. (c) Associated lights and noise will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. (d) Large scale construction and parking lots can be buffered from the adjacent uses. (e) Privacy of adjacent residential developments can be maintained. (f) The site layout can respond to existing community identity and street patterns. (g) Buffering can screen the project from adjacent uses. (h) There is adequate area landscaping to filter the dust from the site area. (3) Site Characteristics (a) The land intended for development has an average site topography of less than a 10% grade, or it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques, all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. (None: This does not apply to parks. ) (b) The site is of a size which can accommodate the present and future uses and is of a shape which allows for a site layout in a manner which maximizes user convenience and energy conservation. (c) The unique natural features, if any, can be incorporated into the design of the facilities or arrangement of land use-= - 3. High Impact Utilities and Facilities A. Scale (1) Access (a) There is direct access from the site to a major collector street and traffic will not be routed through local neighborhood streets. (b) Site access will not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion, considering the roadway capacity, existing and projected traffic counts, speed limits and number of turning movements. (c) There is public transit to the site. r (2) Impact of the Proposed Change on Adjacent Lands -87- (a) It is compatible with surrounding uses, considering scale, character and use. (b) It will reinforce orderly and timely development. (c) Associated lights and noise will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. (d) large scale construction and parking lots can be buffered from the adjacent uses. (e) Privacy of adjacent residential developments can be maintained. (f) Community identity can be maintained through design and site layout which blends the structure into the residential character of the area. (g) Buffering can screen the project from adjacent uses. (h) There is adequate landscaping to filter the dust from the site area. (3) Site Characteristics (a) The land intended for development has an average site topography of less than a 10% grade, or it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques, all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigated. (b) The site is of a size which can accommodate the present and future uses and is of a shape which allows for a site layout in a manner which maximizes user convenience and energy conservation. (c) The unique natural features, if any, can be incorporated into the design of the facilities or arrangement of land uses. 4. Major Impact Utilities and Facilities A. Locational Criteria (1) Access (a) There is direct access from the site to an arterial or freeway traffic will not be routed through local neighborhood streets. (b) Site access will not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion, considering the roadway capacity, existing and projected traffic counts, speed limits and number of turning movements. (c) There is public transit to the site. -88- (2) Impact- of the Proposed Change on Adjacent Lands (a) It is compatible with surrounding uses , considering scale, character and use. • (b) It will reinforce orderly and timely development. (c) Associated lights and noise will not interfere with the activities and uses on surrounding properties. (d) Large scale construction and parking lots can be buffered from the adjacent uses. (e) Privacy of adjacent residential developments can be maintained. (f) Community identity can be maintained through design and site layout which blends the structure into the residential character of the area. (g) Buffering can screen the project from adjacent uses. (h) There is adequate landscaping to filter the dust from the site area. (i) Development can support and/or be compatible with the surrounding developments. (3) Site Characteristics (a) The land intended for development has an average site topography of less than a 10% grade, or it can be demonstrated that through engineering techniques, all limitations to development and the provision of services can be mitigatzzd. (b) The unique natural features, if any, can be incorporated into the design of the facilities or arrangement of land uses. (c) The site if of a size which can accommodate the present and future uses and is of a shape which allows for a site layout in a manner which maximizes user convenience and energy conservation. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 1. As a part of the ongoing planning program, the City shall: a. Prepare and maintain a data base inventory of existing public utilities and facilities. b. Maintain community planning programs to determine community facility needs. -89- 2. The following strategies should be addressed as a part of the Community Development Code : a. Provide for public utilities and facilities as conditional developments. b. Require design review approval for all facilities and uses. C. Include standards related to access, circulation, parking, loading, storage, landscaping, and signs. 3. The City shall develop a capital improvements program which programs public utility and facility needs provided by the County. -90-