City Council Packet - 01/17/1983 t
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an
SPECIAL/STUDY SESSION AGENDA agenda item needs to sign their name on the k
JANUARY 17, 1983, 7:30 P.M. appropriate sign-up sheet(s). if no sheet is
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL provided, ask to be recognized by the Chair.
LECTURE ROOM
r
1. SPECIAL MEETING:
i 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
i
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda items Under Open
Agenda
2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to: i
2.1 RECEIVE AND FILE DEPARTMENTAL MONTHLY REPORTS/UPDATE/MACC s
2.2 RECEIVE AND FILE THE FOLLOWING:
i
o Resolution No. 83-03 Expressing Sympathy on Death of Tom McCall
o Letter from Lou Krupnick re: Resignation from TURA Committee
2.3 APPROVE OLCC APPLICATIONS AS FOLLOWS:
o L•Ecurie Restaurant, 12386 SW Main, Tigard, Disp.0 License
o Lone Oak Restaurant, 11920 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, Disp.A Lic.
2.4 APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 83-04 Planning Commission Appointment
2.5 APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 83-05 MACC Acceptance of Rivergrove
2.6 RATIFY NPO APPOINTMENTS
E
3. ELECTION OF COUNCIL PRESIDENT
0 City Recorder
4. FLOODPLAIN/GREENWAY/OPEN SPACE POLICY DISCUSSION
0 Planning A Development Director
F
5. SENSITIVE LANDS POLICY DISCUSSION i
0 Public Works Director
6. PARK BOARD WORKSHOP
0 Council and Park Board
w
7. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENAL REPORT - ANNUAL
0 Public Works Director
8. 72ND AVENUE LID STATUS REPORT
0 Public Works Director and Project Engineer
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will 90 into Executive
Session under ORS 192.660 (1)(f) and (1)(d) to consider pending
litigation and labor relation issues.
10. SPACE NEEDS II REPORT
0 City Administrator
11. COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP SEMINAR
0 Councilor Brian
12. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair
under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are
encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting.
' 13. ADJOURNMENT
COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 17, 1983
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
r
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - JANUARY 17, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian (arriving
at 7:33 p.m.) , John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla, Ima Scott; Frank
Currie, Director of Public Works; Doris Hartig, Finance
Director/City Recorder; Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill
Monahan, Director of Planning and Development; Ed Sullivan,
Legal Counsel.
2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL AND AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA.
(a) City Administrator added the following items to open agenda:
.1 Authorize joint purchase of police cars under State of Oregon e
bid.
.2 Approve payment of bills - $176,064.72
.3 Deed Acceptance S.W. McDonald LID
.4 Receive and File Questionnaire Results
.5 Tax Increment Financing Resolution
.6 Policy Advisory Board Representative Discussion
s
3. RECEIVE AND FILE DEPARTMENTAL MONTHLY REPORTS
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive and
file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
4. RECEIVE AND FILE:
o RESOLUTION NO. 83-03 EBPRESSING SYMPATHY ON DEATH OF TOM
MCCALL.
o Letter from Lou Krupnick re: resignation from TURA Committee.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive and
file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
5. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATIONS
o L'Ecurie Restaurant, 12386 SW Main, Tigard, (Disp. C License)
o Lone Oak Restaurant, 11920 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard (Disp. C Lie.)
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive and
file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 83-04 AS RESOLUTION
TOF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL KING
O THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
PP
Appointing Ron Jordan for term expiring July 1, 1984.
PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 17, 1983
f (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 83-05 A RESOLUTICI PROVIDING THE CITY OF TIGARD'S
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE AMENDMENT OF BOTH THE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ENTITLED,
"INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT -
METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION" AND
THE ADOPTED CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT TO PERMIT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF
RIVERGROVE, OREGON TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE
METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND A
PARTY TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
8. RATIFY NPO APPOINTMENTS
o Dennis R. Russell NPO #2
o Thomas R. Woodward NPO #2
o Bill Bieker NPO #5
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9. ELECTION OF COUNCIL PRESIDENT
(a) Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Mayor Bishop to nominate
Councilor Kenneth Scheckla as President of Council and authorize him
to co-sign city checks.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
10. FLOODPLAIN/GREENWAY/OPEN SPACE POLICY DISCUSSION
(a) Director of Planning & Development discussed City policy regarding
preserving the floodway and the conflict in code allowing development
in the sensitive lands floodway area. He reported that both the CCI
and Park Board have discussed the issue of allowing encroachment into
the floodplain and no use in the floodplain unless it meets certain
criteria. He explained the staff's position of trying to establish a
policy to allow for economic development of the floodplain area with
protection provided in the Municipal Code for residential
neighborhoods.
Director of Planning and Development requested Council input at this
time before going through the hearing process at Planning Commission
level and back to City Council for final review. Council expressed
the*.r concern regarding protection to the residential neighborhoods,
air quality and buffer zones. Staff responded to comments and the
issue will be brought before Council next week.
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 17, 1983
Aw
11. SENSITIVE LANDS POLICY DISCUSSION
(a) Director of Public Works discussed with Council some of the problems
involved with administration of the sensitive lands policy. Staff
recommends the code be amended to provide for different levels of
sensitive land areas and administration of the development code.
Staff is hoping to incorporate policy into the comprehensive plan and
the development code and make it simple and easy to administer.
Staff recommendations will be prepared as a policy statement and
brought back to Council for further review.
12. 8:25 P.M. PARK BOARD/CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
Park Board Members Present: Ron Jordan, Mary Payne, Betty Golden,
Bob Bellinger, and Susan Sheridan.
Purpose of the meeting was to discuss concerns of the Park Board and
establish better communication between Council and Board. Ron Jordon
responded that there is a vacancy on the Board and most of the other
concerns voiced earlier have been taken care. They appreciated the
staff support and feedback. Discussion followed regarding the
development of bike paths, preservation of the windmill site,
portable band stand for Cook Park, creation of "Friends of the
Windmill Committee", the issue of implementing a recreation program,
i.e. economic feasibility, type of program, joint program with other
entities, options and possibilities. Staff to gather information and
report back.
9:15 P.M. WORKSHOP ADJOURNED
13. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT
Public Works Department summarized activities during the past year,
showing slids of staff, equipment, and work accomplished by the
Engineering Department on streets and bike paths.
Director of Public Works introduced staff members Jerry McNurlin, 4
Superintendent of Public Works; John Hagman, Engineering
Superintendent; and Randy Clarno, Crew Chief who synopsized
activities during the past year, showing further slides of staff,
equipment, and work accomplished by the various divisions of the
department.
i
10:15 P.M. RECESS
10:25 P.M. RECONVENE
i
14. 72nd AVENUE LID STATUS REPORT
(a) In response to Council inquiry regarding engineering services,
Director of Public Works reviewed the engineering contract for
services; type of statement received from DeHaas and Associates as
well as a capsulized summary of 72nd LID engineering expenditures.
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 17, 1983
Director of Public Works reported he had reviewed the letter and the
( costs are proper and should be charged to the project. Council and
staff further discussed various aspects of the project, the
assessable portion to the property owners, settlement on litigation
and right-of-way costs.
Tony ZMaksym, from the audience, submitted several questions and asked
it Council would respond. Consensus was to have the questionnaire
submitted in writing to the City Administrator for response. Copies
of questionnaire are to be distributed to Council.
15. SPACE NEEDS II REPORT
(a) Due to time limitations consensus was to continue this item.
16. COMMUNITY LEADERSIiIP SEMINAR
(a) Councilor Brian shared information on Chamber of Commerce sponsored
seminar. Purpose of seminar is to develop skills and knowledge to
serve on community committees and boards as well as stimulate
community involvement. He requested Council support this worthwhile
endeavor and noted there would be no City financial obligation.
(b) Notion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to support the
seminar.
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council.
17. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair
under item 1.3 were discussed at this time.
17.1 POLICE VEHICLE PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION
Chief of Police requested authorization to purchase two Chevrolet
Malibu patrol vehicles under the State of Oregon bid.
Notion to approve purchase by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor
Scott.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
17.2 APPROVE BILLS FOR PAYMENT: $176,064.72
(a) Columbia Excavating - 72nd Avenue LID $118,941.60
Martin Engineering Co. - iMcRenize St. LID $2,476.80
Charles Schmidt - Tigardville HSLL, LID $54,646.32
(b) Notion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL ZMINUTES - JANUARY 17, 1983
%
6
i
17.3 ACCEPT STREET DEDICAT102' - AUTHORIZE SIGNING AND APPROVE PAYMENT
$723.75 - Tigardville Hgts. LID/Kenneth & Diana Frazer
Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scott to approve.
k
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
17.4 RECEIVE AND FILE QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
City Administrator requested this item be setover for discussion at
another time. Council concurred.
x
r
17.5 RESOLUTION NO. 83-06 IN THE MATTER OF INITIATING THE PROCESS
TO REPEAL THE TAR INCREMENT FINANCING t
ELEMENT OF THE DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION
PLAN.
Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Mayor Bishop suggested this matter be submitted to the voters on the
May election date and this matter be tabled until February 14, 1983.
Motion by Mayor Bishop, seconded by Councilor Brian to table
resolution until February 14, 1983, Council meeting.
Motion to table passed by 3-2 majority vote with Councilors Scott and `
Scheckla voting "nay".
F
17.6 POLICY ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER REPRESENTATIVE DISCUSSION
i
Councilor Scheckla reported on CDBG meeting he had attended stating
the City's request for Fanno Creek funding appeared to be approved.
Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scott to appoint
Council Scheckla as City's HUD advisory board member.
6
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council.
18. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Council went into executive session under ORS 192.660 !
(1)(f) and (1)(d) to consider pending litigation and labor relation issues.
r
e
19. ADJOURNMENT: 12:00 Midnight
City Recorder - City of Tigard--74
ATTEST:
6
F
Mayor - City of Tigard
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 17, 1983
(0398A)
January 14, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LOREEN WILSON, OFFICE MANAGER
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FOR 1-17-83 COUNCIL AGENDA
The following items are enclosed for your packet.
t
t
AGENDA ITEM #
4 Memorandum from Planning Director
8 72nd Avenue Status Report
12.2 Bills For Payment: $ 176,064.72
o Columbia Excavating - 72nd Avenue LID - $118,941.60
o Martin Engr. Co. - McKenzie St. LID - $2,476.80
o Charles Schmidt - Tigardville Hgts. LID - $54,646.32
12.3 Accept Street Dedication & Approve Payment - $723. 75
Tigardville Hgts. LID Kenneth & Diana Frazer
12.4 Receive and File Questionnaire Results
12.5 Resolution regarding Tax Increment Financing
t
lw
(0333A)
POLICE DEPARTMENT 14ONTHLY REPORT -� t
December, 1982
and
Yearly Recap
TO: City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
I. Personnel
The department continues to be down one from full strength this month, as
Officer Burgard's position still has not been filled. His was the only
resignation or termination received during this entire year.
The average daily department strength this month was 16.8 as compared to
16.4 for December, 1981. By division, the breakdown is as follows:
Administration 1.7; Services Division 4.5; Patrol Division 7.7; and
Investigation Division 1.9.
Note: During December, 1982 only the two motor officers were listed
under the Traffic Division. Their average daily strength was 1.0.
II. Service Delivery
The department responded to 401 non-criminal calls for service in contrast
to 379 calls in December, 1981.
The combined total non-criminal calls for service this year was 5,555;
for this same time period in 1981 the total was 5,389•
Patrol Division's obligated time this month was 1,266.3 hours, for the
year it was 16,024.9. The non-obligated time this month was 956.2
hours, for the year it was 11,644.8.
III. Crime
There were 95 Part I crimes reported this month as compared to 107 for
December of 1981, down by 12 crimes in this classification, or
There were 26 Part I crimes cleared this month, or 27.4°k•
The total Part I crimes reported this year was 1,223, in contrast to
1,102 for this same period last year, an increase of 10.9%-
The clearance rate for Part I crimes this year is 23.50/6, or 287 cases.
In contrast to the same time period of 1981, 23.1% were cleared, or 255
cases.
There were 49 Part II crimes reported this month, of that number 25
were cleared, or 510/6. For the same month last year, 57 were reported
and 27 were cleared, or 47.4%.
The total Part II crimes reported this year was 775 in contrast to 778
reported this same time period of 1981, a decrease of 3 cases, or
(` There were 438 Part II cases cleared this year, or 56.5°4, for this same
time period in 1981, 434 cases were cleared, or 55.8%.
The Investigative Division worked 23 'active cases this month, and cleared
9, or 39.1°4. The total active cases worked this year by. the Investigative
(f .
Division was 253, of that number 105 cases were cleared, or 41.5%.
The reported property loss this month was $109,560.29, and this month we
recovered $11,682 .38 worth of stolen property, or 10.7%.
The combined total property loss for this year was $679,843.34, of that
total $226,309.68 was recovered, or 33*.3%.
IV. Traffic
Patrol Division responded to 33 accidents, of that number 11 were injury.
There were 264 citations issued this month as compared to 179 in December,
1981. There were also 33 warnings issued this month, and 82 were issued
for this same time period in 1981.
Patrol Division has issued a total of 2,377 citations this year in
contrast to 2,485 for this same time period last year.
There has been a total of 365 accidents reported this year, and 347 were
reported for this same time period last year. There were 104 injury
accidents plus one fatal accident reported this year; 94 injuries plus
two fatals were rpeorted last year in 1981.
The Enforcement Index this month was 19.09, as compared to 9.00 for
December, 1981.
The Enforcement Index for this year is 14.39 in contrast to 14.27 for
{ last year of 1981.
V. Police Reserves
The Reserve Unit worked 208-1/2 hours this month assisting the department
in policing the community; through the year the Reserves donated 2,868-1/2
hours of community service. See attached report from the Reserves for
their total training and activities.
VI. Training
A. Word Processing. Records Supervisor Carrick received 72 hours of
training on word processing skills. This course was taught by Key
Computer Concepts at Portland Community College from November 8 to
December 6, 1982.
VII. Community Relations
A. Oral Board Participation. Records Supervisor Carrick spent two days
assisting Gresham Police Department interview applicants for the position
of Police Assistant I (Records Clerk) , on December 16 and 17.
B. Driver's Education. Officer Grisham taught driver's education to
approximately 120 students at the high school on December 3. This took
7 hours of his duty time.
C. Police Intern. On December 7, Lt. Jennings met with the laision
person for Community Education from Portland Community College to discuss
( the police intern program. This meeting lasted 2 hours.
saw
D. Crime batch. Chief Adams and Sgt. Martin (and Joey) spent 2 hours
at Summerfield implementing their Crime Watch program on December 8.
E. Retirement Party. On December 9, Lt. Jennings acted as Tigard's
official representative and attended the retirement dinner for Capt. Woody
Sherratt from the Washington County Sheriff's Department. This party
lasted approximately 4 hours.
NOTE: There were 120 citizens contacted by Officer Grisham this month,
and a total of 7 man hours were spent doing this.
Respectfully submitted,
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police
RBA:ac
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF DECEMBER 19 82
DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL
AVERAGE `4
NUMERICAL STRENGTH DAILY ABSENCE fl AVERAGE EFFECTIVE STRENGTH
End of Same This Same This Last Same
this Month Month Month Month Month Month
Month Last Last Last
Year Year Year
TOTAL PERSONNEL 28 28 11.2 11.6 16.8 17.6 16.4
CHIEF'S OFFICE 3 3 1.3 1.2 1.7 1.4 1.8
SERVICES DIVIS. 7 6 2.5 2.2 4.5 4.6 3.8
PATROL DIVISION 13 16 5.3 6.8 7.7 9.6 9.2
TRAFFIC DIVIS. 2 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0
INVEST. SECTION 3 3 1.1 1.1 �; 1.9 1.8 1.9
FO -F ONE 12 13 5.1 6.9 6.9 6.6 8.1
FOR�.r: TWO 10 8 4.1 3.6 5.9 6.3 4.4
FORCE THREE 6 7 2.0 1.1 4.0 4.7 3.9
CHANGES IN PERSONNEL DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH
1. Present for duty end of last month 28 This Same Month j
Month Last Year
2. Recruited during month 0
1. Total number field .
3. Reinstated during month 0 officers 15 16
Total to account for 28 2. Less Agents Assig- `
4. Separations from the service: n.ed to Investigat. 0 0
(a) Voluntary resignation 0 3. Average daily abs-
0 ences of field off-
(b) Retirement icers owing to:
(c) Resigned with charges pending 0 (a) Vacation, susp-
0 ension, days off,
(d) Dropped during probation comp. time, etc. 5.8 6.3
(e) Dismissed for cause 0 (b) Sick & Injured •3
(f) Killed in line of duty
0 (c) Schools, etc. .2 .3
0 Total average daily
(g) Deceased absences- 6.3 6.8
r Total separations 0
5.l'rresent for duty at end of month
28 4. Available £or duty 8.7 9.2
Page one - - - _- --- --�
min
TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Monthly Report
I. Calls for Service: This Month 545 Year to Date 7,553
A. Obligated Time 1,266.3 B. Non-Obligated Time 956-2
IZ. PART I CRIMES No. Cleared Arrests
A. Homicide
B. Rape 1 1 1
C. Robbery 1 2 2
D. Assault 5
E. Burglary 21 2 3
F. Larceny 63 13 13
G. Auto Theft 4 2 2
Totals 95 26 24
III. PART II TOTALS 49 25 26
TOTAL - Part I and II.
144 51 50
IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARGED: 50
a. Adult Male 31 c. Juvenile Male 11
b. Adult Female '4 d. Juvenile Female -
V. WARRANTS SERVED 8
VI. TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 109,560.29 TOTAL PROPERTY RECOVERED $ 11,632.38
VII. TRAFFIC
a. Accidents Investigated 33 Injury Accidents 11 Fatal 0
b. Citations: VBR (Speeding) 96 Yield Right of Way___4_
Following too Close 1 Red Light 52 Stop Sign 15
Improper Turn 1 Reckless Driving_2__
Careless Driving 10 Driving Under the Influence 7
Driving While Suspended 13 Other Hazardous 9
Non-Hazardous 54 Total Hazardous 210
C. Enforcement Index 19.09
d. Traffic Enforcement Totals
Citations: This Month This Year 264 Year to Date 2377
This Month Last -Year 179 Last Year to Date 2485
Warnings: This Month This Year 33 Year to Date 697
This Month Last Year 82 Last Year to Date 0
NOTE: - Part I Crimes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate_ 27.4°
- Part II Crimes (Minor Crimes) Clearance Rate 51.0110
TIGARD POLICE DEPARTN.EN"I'
Yearly -Report
I. Calls for Service: 7,553
l A. Obligated Time 16,024.9 B, Non-Obligated Time 11,644.8
II. PART I CRIMES
No. Cleared Arrests
�- A. Homicide 2 2 1
B. Rape 5 3 2
C. Robbery 26 8 12
D. Assault 98 76 51 _
E. Burglary 324 33 38
F. Larceny 726 152 138
G. Auto Theft r2
-
Totals 1,223 287 25.4
III. PART II TOTALS 775 438 444
TOTAL - Part I and II
1,998 725 698
IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARGED: 698
a. Adult Male 368 C. Juvenile Male 183
b. Adult Female 85 d. Juvenile Female 62
V. WARRANTS SERVED 142
VI. TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 679,843.34 TOTAL PROPERTY RECOVERED $ 226,309.68
VII. TRAFFIC '--
a. Accidents Investigated 365 Injury Accidents 104 Fatal 1
b. Citations: VBR (Speeding) 463 Yield Right of Way 75
Following -too _Close 22 Red._Light 260 Stop Sign_158
Improper Turn 63 Reckless Driving 15 _
Careless Driving 154 Driving Under the Influence 101
1
Driving While Suspended 89 Other Hazardous 150
Non-Hazardous 880 Total Hazardous 1,497
C. Enforcement Index 14.39 -
d. Traffic Enforcement Totals '
Citations: 2,377
CWarnings: 697
NOTE: - Part I Crimes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate 23.5%
- Part 11 Crimes (Minor Crimes) Clearance Rate 56-576
o� 0
_ rJ71 _
x ALARMS AND PERMIT RE-CAP
Month of DECEMBER, 198
Total
This Month Same Month Last Year Change Year to Date
TOTAL ALARMS. ... .... 67 64 + 4a 242
'- + 4% 241
a. -False.... . .... 67 64
b. Donafide.... . 0 0 1
PERMITS ISSUED.. .. . .F160
PERMIT FEES..... .. . . $2,615
1
PERMITS REVOKED. ....
$40
REVOKED FEES. ......
( )NTHLY SUMMARY STATEMENT: -
Note an increase in alarms from a year ago same month. This is due in part to an
increase in installed systems.
It has' been found that since the Alarm Ordinance'was enacted, the alarm system users
that had the most false alarms created by either the user or a system malfunction have
nearly ceased to have any problems.
Although there are still false alarms occurring,' the rate is dropping per, systems
being used.
MEMORANDUM
:
r
a
January 13, 1983
TO: City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police k
a
SUBJECT: Special Events
RE: Tigard School District Activities
9
C
F
}
Sir:
Throughout the school year the police department is asked to provide
security and traffic control at special events; i.e. , athletic events
and dances.
The manpower directed to this activity is the Police Reserve element,
and they are paid by the School District for their time. This last
year, due to increased attendance of at home football games, there was
a slight impact upon the swing shift personnel for traffic control
after the games. When regular personnel were available, one or two
patrolmen were assigned to a traffic control activity at the end of the
game for approximately a half hour.
If there are any additional questions, please advise.
Respectfully,
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police
RBA:ac
1
C tU .--1 t
-.a G CO 00 Ln O
i 'b ►+ •.4
C O Y+
d H O a
P+ dLn
O
3c
O
0
-rt i
u G
r ra � A M M
� dI 0
to �.
„a b;A 0 o� o
� wco
r
G
O T
41 m
r4 oo a 14
-4G O 5
•rt L
b �4 01 O
H 4J "' a. d
x z W 0 �o
o N 41 4
U o; G
N W -4 3
n t
oO O
04
1-4
U '4 ?
H -Ay 1 .�'O.
.at\ M N O O dl
r4 k
� a
ci O W 41 U S
U y z a. w s
Oo A O
x
O O O Ai t [
A W m C CD CD O O O O O O
N O N O
n �7
F4 E
LIP :mO O W r i c!} <f3- co
6
to d
� W
O i
H
H f
d
H }xa N O
U T Cl �7 O O [
U trl d O O N O 7 f
co M -4 N � � E
G M M E
1 � �
T coM
cb 14d t
W W C: o-,
00 M
G y
•rl
00 d
T b J H +1 OD
po tiIIzr ra tf•1 %o �--� u'1 $4 MM O n �c0 w i.�
ra W
to O� --N r-4 W
h 0 0 3+ to
H A W H
�O
'b o 3
a�
o
O G C
P.
N O to W QO N
y t a
O 4..3 w L+ O V1 W •rl W O
C: cri co
to
0 w N U N G f` O G C7 >, 0 C -4vOi H cc to +�
.1 t0 H O) Z L W .-t to (-. W 41 0) G
L N tU N
to -4 W � u m to W N i F-44/ JJ ct1 W d -14 34 u U W N to v A m a� E to ,� N b S.- 7 c B ++ +� E
U3 W s. to ,v R1 cd •4 cO o •.a 7 0 *+ d
c H .7 W -3
-3W Od. to •a U H � P. aC .a Z O 3
00 >,
G CO 00 .n O
v �. •-4
C O �+
4/ aJ H O
O
n -4
O
N
mL
m � u G
m
A c� d O
4J w
G
A-) m " W
O -.+ O
. 4 O O O O +� J-j
H 4J -A 7. d
pG O w O.
O z U d
O u
U 4J
O,
N
00ON O
L14 -491.
4-J '-"� 41 a.
H r4 C C,
U . • m
t-4 H rl O ,cc : 4-)
O C7 N
to O
iJ W 1+ •c O
x U z N 4J U
O A a W
d J O
a ►4
cr
` A
0 w '' 0 0 0 0 o i
m o a► u o
' N r-
W-4
rn �-+ .-+ N Q
dO coir � � yr rh rh c0 d
w' w
a x
K
v] O
z w
O
H
E-
E-
W-4 N .�
U N O
'-a O
W C', N O
pp cn
cn cn
co
cl $4 M d
OD P+ W O Q 4-3
1 co
Q � b W N
0O0 ;..t m O L
T a cOj m .O
j d 4J bo
r-4 �O r+ Ln on O •.a ~ C G
�n rn r� a -4 M CO a :2 -G
N w
N p
O co N p •ca
Fc' U) � A w H
a
lo 3 m b w
G .J 4 H w G w o
O Z iJ d O a. a m 94
41 C a O .G a p U O Q G Gl l+
cn b 11 G p :2 O u14 O cq w -4 w O
G d O ca z GIt G co G C G o b `"
3f-c d w +- d O O N O U ca o0 -4 w G cn
co m U r G '£>+ G U 7- N •.a • 4 C m 1+ c0 m 4-3
L N d W cu W N '� L w rl m G d L w G
0 r-4 S-1 L m QJ L m 1--H N L td w 01 •x l+ w .2 m C
cd cn 4l A m N 6 to u N b 34 7 ci f3 u u OE
u cn cu S. H cv ro d cn .a H :m: ate. x .� z o 3
U E,, .-a a. "n.-i a. a, - -
T'i4D
LIBRAW
PUBLICPhone 639-9511 MONTHLY REPORT December 1982
12568 SW Main-Tigard. Or. 97223
TO: LIBRARY BOARD
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN
Water Damage: On December 3, the library experienced water leakage in the non-ficfottunatnlY,
g
over the biography section. This is the second incident in two months and again,
occurred during work hours and the staff was able t prevent
thata time themage to tareaawaslcoveredhe
it but it took five days and g
owner took care of repairs,
Y
with plastic sheeting to prevent possible damage. Any time this happens there is loss Of
staff time and disruption of service.
Buy
-A-Book: Six Buy-A-Book donations were received this month. New promotional materials
were printed and are being distributed.
ns: A gift of $500 was received by the library, dnd1MrsteSteffanoffd to buy mfrom Summerfieore, better ld
Donations: g young and old. Dr. a
enjoyable readingmaterial for the y g
are the generous donors. the
Coin-0 Com uter Demonstration: Librarian and santsuchrarprogramian ewouldtenhance nlibrary
n
of a coin operated microcomputer presented byGaylord. and be
ld
( ervice in that educational/informational ouldpbegmanagedu through ffees dpatrons
large enough toucoverna
personal programs as well. cospace
ition _ offer good opportunity
lease option. The library buildingconsidered ad P cono
for this presently. ssible servicesdelivery modeat some future
It should be cons
time, however. lled i
Library Board Meeting: el`heeTimber Library ard Municipaloard Codemrequireswas
snce
ixameetings bannually. non-The
urgency of agenda items. g
Board had met that requirement.
TY Kathleen Wendel has volunteered to lededitthrP netYissuet,rKathleent'slhelp risddoubly '
k
Sue Kristof's absence. After the staff struggled
valuable.
CCLS: On December 16, the professional board r WCC Slwason County expanded tooincludeespecific prro-
W The Lon Range Plan for
met. Of interest: (1) g- y A volunteer group is
gram plans for reference service, outreach and books b mail. (2) p
starting a community library in the Garden Home CommunityCenter.atin
e Tax Parks and Recreation
is providing rent-free space at
Assistance
VITA: The Library will participateiin theby luntakieerng aIncom mentsforapVITAworagain,
�
ker. The
me
offering income tax service
to Library also offers tax help materials and forms- service for Libraries-- free in
of
Copy Machine: Xerox has phased out its for rentaL,Pmatermials oreservice, but merely turned in money
that the library did not pay
with
collected in the coin box. A smaller, newer an50mo00e eColiesnare .10 and 1past lfigures ng eindicate
an option to buy. The monthly rental will be $ P will
'~ that public usage will cover this. Staff time will be saved inasmuch as Library copying
also be done on this machine instead of at City Hall.
TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD - MONTHLY REPORT - December 1982 page 2 €
Volunteers: Volunteers worked a total of 116.75 hours; daily average 4.9. This was about a
(_T
drop from last month, caused by illness and holiday activities.
A party for volunteers was given at the Library on the evening of December 6. There were a
games, stories and refreshments. Friends of the Library purchased a gift for each volunteer
and these were presented. The Library now counts twenty active volunteers.
Work Indicators: December 1982 December 1981
Adult Books 5721 5964
Juvenile Books 2136 1597
71 74
Interlibrary Loan
Magazines 338 298
Records/Cassettes 173 197
Other 17 30
Total Circulation 8456 8160
Days of Service 20 21
Average Daily Circulation 422 389
% Increase - circulation 4% -
Reference/Reader's Advisory 426 436
Materials Added 650 448
Materials Withdrawn 301 321
Story-Time Total 35 37
Borrowers: new/renewals 131/85=216 160/ -
Youth Service: John Henshell
{ %ristmas was the theme for room decorations and the Christmas books were displayed for easy
access. December 22 was Christmas party for children in grades 1-4. There was a film strip,
stories, games and refreshments.
The "E" and "E 1-4" books were weeded and some the "E" books were reclassified "E 1-4." One
hundred paperbacks and 34 hard-cover books were added to the juvenile and young adult sections.
Juvenile circulation increased 34% over the same time last year.
i
Outreach: John Henshell
An outreach program was planned and presented at King City Convalescent Center. A dozen I
residents attended. There were Christmas stories and film strips with felt board pictures
as well as audience participation. Response was warm and positive. I
r
Plans are underway to present a program at the Senior Center in the near future.
Each month 24 large print books go to the King City Library. A volunteer picks up the books
and returns them to the Library.
i
i
�44
• i
i
_ i
-M
BUY-A- BOOK !
Help yourself and your library at the same time -- BUY-A-BOOK!
How frustrating it is to hear or read about a new book, come to the litrary and
discover that it is on the "wish list" because of limited book funds!
You are #10 on a best seller reserve list -- the library hes one copy and it
circulates for 2 weeks IF the reader returns it on time! The book won't be a best
seller by the time your turn comes.
What to do? Go out and buy a copy? Wait for the paperback edition?
NO! Ask about BUY- A - BOOK!
The library is able to purchase at a discount price. The library will order the
book of your choice (consistent with the library's book selection policy) and when
the book arrives, you donate that discounted amount to the library.
You will be first to read the book. You will receive a tax deduction and the library
will have a book it needed but could not afford. If you wish, a gift plate with your
name will be placed in the book.
What better way to enrich your community, share all our limited resources and read the
new books while they're still new?
F3iJY-A -BOOK !
AUTHOR:
TITLE:
Where did you hear/read about this book?
YOUR NAME: DATE:
YOUR ADDRESS/TELEPHONE #:
May we place a gift plate with your name in this book,
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
P
t
BUY - A- BOOK !
WARD
ICPLJBLLPhone I for ®ur library
538-95,1
12568 SW Main•Turd. Or. 97223
4
MEMORANDUM
T'
f
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development Ahw
REFERENCE: Housing Authority Units - Winsome Terrace
DATE: January 17, 1983
Attached are three building permit applications submitted by Cinco Homes,
Inc., for the construction of three additional units at S.W. Grant Court,
Winsome Terrace. These permit applications were submitted on January 13, 1983,
along with applications concerning two lots at O'Neel Acres off 95th Avenue
and seventeen units at Angel Place, off S.W. 95th Avenue.
Council has requested that the members of the Housing Authority and it's
Executive Directors Dayton Page, meet with Council at a special study session
on February 7, 1983 at City Hall. An invitation was extended by Mayor Bishop,
which Mr. Page has informed me will be considered at the Authority's next
meeting.
Since the Building Division must process the building permit applications
in a timely manner, staff is now requesting direction from Council concerning
the issuance of the three permits for S.W. Grant Court.
1
r:
fi
MIFN
4,
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIGAilD DATE BUILD,s_-3PHONE
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERNUT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OWNER P ONE
O AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN HE ACCOtAPANYING PLANS AND SPECtFiCATlONS.
/( ,,QQ �` j17 LOT NO.7
O't1NERd�S M 9.�tlT►1 o"at� 0!JOB ADORESS
`\(� e� T.�p+ n t1 j� L ARCHITECT Vt vt \0
p
BUILDER Si 1 ►i C t2 O t" "G.ADDRESS �� iJ!).� T�� 1 11 dJ� -.5A/&9
❑ ADDITION [—].REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL ❑ FIREDAMAGE ❑ DEIdOLITION
STRUCTURE �EdEW ❑ REMODEL
RESIDENCE ❑ COMM ❑ EDUCATIONAL ❑.GOV'T ❑ RELIGIOUS ❑ PA-1 ❑ CARPORT ❑ GARAGE ❑ STOR GE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE
r
OCa.J?ANCY LANOUSEZONE Bt�G.TYPE FIREZONE �' PLAN CHECK BY
Ito
A
SEWER PERMITIV
OCC LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT NO STORIES AREA NO.BEDROOMS .3 VALUE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT -SETBACKS FRONT REAR LEFTSIDE RIGHTSIDE :
Permit THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODES ZON!N:.
REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. AND IT IS HERc3Y AGREED TY.AT'TY.E
lPlacyChock WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE
I
WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.THE ISSUANCE-OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE
j .otal• RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS.CONTRACTOR AND SU CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS
LICENSE.SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,?LUtA81NG AND HEATING. i
Stile T,L. SOC
Total . •
PDC# APPLICANT R AGENT
BY .. I
Recelpt NO. PttONE
ADDRESS
APpraao8 E
41 pfl
SDC
POC S -�-- /00
SEWER CONNECTION $
SEWER INSPECTION $
SEWER SUFcCHARGE $
4
Comments: —
s
i
I
' 4
F
• v
i;
Mrd
Y-
( �
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIOPd TIGAt�� aArF 19
EIN INDICATED
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HERBO1UNHERR P ONE -
Q AS SHOWN
IN AND APPROVED IN THE AC LOT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. LOT NO. M
/Jj D� ��6�$Y1.�. .p0!��`eon '- a
OKsIh `i Of'd JOB ADDRESS OED ® 9w
O'1lNER ARC. ��v �pr►Yff.�►� �.
.3 fan 4� H,1 �
BUILDER v I " co �`0 �� IG'AOORESS
� G ❑ Cl.REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL ❑ f1RE DAMAGE ❑ DEmQuTION
STRUCTURE �NEW ❑ REMODEL AOOITION
Mu Q EDUCATIONAL ❑.GOV'T [3*RELIGIOUS C3PATIO ❑ CARPORT GARAGE G STOR GE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE z
RESIDENCE ❑ CO � � HEAT•��—
LANO USEZONE •BLDG-TYPE FIREZONE PLAN CH_CK BY
OCCUPANCY G to
u.ori frit 1 I OoQ-v
SEWER PERMITIT NO.SEDROOMS VALUE
OCC LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT NO.STORIES. AREA
REAR IFFf SIDE RIGHT SIDE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT -SET BACKS . FRONT
t
Pn�n
THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS.CONTAINED IN THE 1'sUiLDING CODE.ZONCNC
REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.AND IT IS HERc3Y AGREED T};AT'TY.E
PtarcChnck WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COIdPLIANCF
{_ laftTH REWRALL APPLICABLECOVENAT&CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRORDINANCES.THE ISSUANCEIENT CITt 8US`IA:ES=
Si . .otal•
LICENSE SF COVEN
LICENSE-SEPARATE PERMRS REAUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUt18i?tG AND HEATING.
Stita Tax
0-
SOC—
Total
OC--Total - POCA _ PUCANT RAGENT __3'
By PttONE
Receipt No. AOORF-SS
Approved
:. Gtr �� •' -
_SOC
PDC
SEWER CONNECTION $ � r
SEWER INSPECTION $
SEWER SURCHARCE 5 ---•-� '
Comments: t•03-�3
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TiGAFID DATE i9=
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE
O AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER-�qM
O'PJNERdKS/9 �� Ot'f� O JOB ADDRESS ® �`d cly dl••' ��s►Ld`+ !!
AARC= \v V �o�rrlGt►+ .
BUILDER 1 C0 I'�0►9'>'Y"� I"C—ADDRESS ttT•� GO T �
t(���
STRUCTURE p� NEW ❑ REMODEL ❑ ADDITION ❑.REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL ❑ FIRE DAMAGE E3 DEMOLITION
RESIDENCE ❑ COMM G EDUCATIONAL El GOVT C3-RELIGIOUS G PATto ❑ CARPORT ❑ GARAGE G STOR GE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE
OCCUPANCY LANOUSEZONE BLOG.TYPE FIRE ZONE PIIINCHECKBY HEAT• 'a
otia Y3 DeQr-o
13
SEWER PERMIT Y
OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT NO STORIES AREA NO BEDROOMS ,3 VALUE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT SETBACKS . FRONT REAR LEFTSIOE RiGHTSIDE
CODE.ZON!NG
NG
PermitSU13JECT TO THE REGULATIONS
REGULATIONS AND ALOL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.AND IT IS HERc3YIAGREED TY.AT TY.E
Piacr eek WORK WILL Be DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COf PLIANCE
WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.THE ISSUANCE-OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE
Sum ,,Cal. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAYS CURRENT CITY BUSINESS
UCENSE.SEPARATEPERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER.PLUMBING AND HEATSNG_
;Stita Tax
SDC_ d
h ea
Total • • b < 1
A PLIC.ANT R AGENT
lPDCX
Receipt No. ADDRESS PttONE
Approved
IDC
3DC S •l-- fD -
SEWER CONNECTION S � �
SEWER INSPECTION
SEWER SURCHARGE g
��:�:*elat�• n .n 1.13-83
-------r-'^'..�_' Apr!/, l.:ri✓
A REPLAT OFA PORTIO:! OF LOTS 30,
OF/'JORrH T/GARDVILLE ADDiT(0,7 f
,.rur..r tnt-Ir
P/L!.P,✓R.•G»71'£RS Of 7Y6 J e .
ESTASO's"040 O£CL4A£ T►tt' =C-
tC£.' 4.VO wL LOTS PFJA4 OF"C
'RE+V.VTAS .;rr Fr-77IJ, .l,YD SCID
TH- UZ Cr' INS PLSLIC 4.S
• - �2� � = ..'..1.G.?J Jo� '''ter• �
Hs:G�✓R IS
rot~vv
il'JT!-1L d•J.YT •I _sop tt: .� _t t:J'l� 1 :.A!i". _ �C '
A .t7T4E?'JtI'St/C iN G:.i•..Jt SAO JCI.T.•J .iy'.:tuv� �.� 'i• ;_`R -n.:
375 C:AJS'A9' K D:.7Rid.Y SFCJt:7�:Y- JSC ✓:... ?-F y'-�` v e•r. , �JOw O
�1 J'Pf ai:ATiG1(G.YD.v:.:.cLO E - --` O -
"ALiIrC JA � FJ?c Z,3f.w S. 3. "s.+•'e! s V J4~ �� =�` L .k. -v• '
AAV AV V
n b !tel
40
mac •� ^{ ��U7� � � ' �.. � `• � '
�CTT_1'S..'"',✓£r:D 4lID L..I:Km �� SBS7 d6~---0 OZ!iy ,-,•
7 rx4r 4r rhi-im :u PL:r FF t- r\,,�ig n1
_.?s 'oIv�.�:: s£n;a^r C =i > z, /� _�-„/
:ar S79 LY�TJ L PC:JT :3 ' .•!`!V 4 g y�0/�'.)� / �� !
J.ta,I's7 rASTAr z04 v M
7C'riSST G•:^.S:i ::_S>r4L. SC4LE' , `� _ '�. ~�' J A �•
!AST 14 J? F-Ir.rHFYC
•, £J.=TT.! n\1 I�.:O' T O
to v .•.�� /. l
..e . �.9 •v3J -
PIP
z_i..J+�am: ,8 P 11 ,O ,''�� - 4,9 A,
i►:'.w , i j, 2 i Q « oat' `\\ ♦41 �,�� QK
MOT A P.9T LV ma PLA?
r CUw�E l71pA
Del rA LE4%r11 r"01TO , vW-J-s-ca raw
rJ-O,_k SS s/
It-OJOO JJ
rf-Jl-l� ZBO4 II>t• SG9 r70 57_F 11001- ----- ` \
K_�Jri7 04 s i0.. `�tvBv'SO$T�N /36.ia'' ASCIX'OA[�L JCl\\20\Cd
� 1\
6?.N' �rcuav f",I^• \
JD•If-IJ rf fO -11%.
00-J1-17 1213 t!Jr' b\
rR-.>d-Sr SCOO'
s*,"-JO f7'If fl.Jf /tl OEnQrLt/Nlr/AL Ponvr
100-/J-J51'f H ••J.C1
!J.".JO JJ.!! J'.: ! • C£AOr[S StI�f 5o,:R Sl7 OIAPIMG t
IJ-IJ-SJ t,1177!' J=SI .V•w.•t, Irrx
- - 'OLAwrs 310-1 50,1 R roJRD 1 ^�
LL'7r1K:APRIL. 1sT 1 _ • \ ,
e.'ASIS Or SEARING? or CS A"J.
I - S o OEROrET YCATJJrrvr/o4A7 AS NOTCO t fJ'717'OO�It'�\
i
C
TIG RD
LIBRARY
PUBL'C phi 639-9511 MONTHLY REPORT November 1982
12588 SW Main•Tigard. Or.97223
TO: LIBRARY BOARD
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN
Water Damage: On November 5, the library experienced water leakage in the children's room
during a heavy rain storm. This occurred during work hours and the staff was able to prevent
damage to materials. It did result in worsening water marks and enlarging a crack in the
ceiling. The owner took care of the roof repairs needed. If this had occurred after work
hours, there would have been considerable loss of materials and damage to furnishings.
Buy:_ Book: Nine Buy-A-Book donations were received and paid for this month. Nine more
are on order. Workload has precluded getting the new promotional materials out as planned.
Fire Alarm Systems: Four firms have responded to the request for bids; three bids are in
and we are awaiting the fourth. After all bids are in, the librarian will meet with Library
Board and City Administrator to determine whether or not the cost justifies the protection.
Council will be kept informed.
( the City Manager's and Librarians' meeting on November 17, it was decided that
'�CCLS: (1) At
a request will the
rd of Commissioners asking that $800,000 be in-
to the Washington County Boaa library automation system. Reso-
cluded in the county's two-year operating serial levyfor
lutions have been submitted to each City Council. (2) On November 18, at the WCCLS pro-
fessional Board meeting, it was decided that each library would prepare a 5-year projection
showing cost savings with an automated circulation system. The information will be compiled
by WCCLS. (3) Coordinator Donna Selle asked each public library to submit a synopsis of
individual library long range plans to be included in the next draft of the WCCLS Long Range
Plan. Tigard has declined to do so because of disagreement over general concepts
optsanso
informed WCCLS by letter; a copy was sent to Council members. (4) $ unexpended
State Aid funds was allocated to various county-wide programs and shared audio-visual ma-
terials and equipment. (5) The 1983-84 operating budget was approved as presented by the
WCCLS budget committee and sent to the Citizens' Advisory Board.
Volunteers: Volunteers worked a total of 151.5 hours; daily average 8.4.
November 1982 November 1981
Work Indicators: 5452 4888
Adult Books 1734
Juvenile Books 2235
132 96
Interlibrary Loan 500 303
Magazines 125
Records/Cassettes 144
70 37
Other 7183
Total Circulation 8533
Days of Service 18 16
477 449
Average Daily Circulation 67
1 Increase-circulation 566 482
Reference/Reader's Advisory 598 307
Materials Added 17 123
Materials Withdrawn 52 30
Story-Time Total 177/77 141/no renewals
Borrowers: new/renewals
TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY - MONTHLY REPORT, November 1982 - page 2
r
.outh Services: John Henshell
One of the goals in the youth services area has been to facilitate use of the materials.
This has been implemented by a revision of the subject catalog for juvenile fiction, age-
level labeling of books and special displays of new materials. Horse stories are a great
favorite for younger people and so the "horse books" haveall been labeled with bright orange
stickers, 100 subject cards were added to the catalog and the books were placed on display.
November was "Library Helpers Month. " Six children participated. Projects included cleaning
the blackboard, stamping routing slips and putting date-due slips on posters that circulate.
"Books are Big Fun" buttons were awarded. Parental response was enthusiastic.
Circulation remained high, particularly in easy books. The juvenile and young adult circu-
lation is considerably higher than last year. This is a result of increased buying and
careful selection for these age groups. Private schools are not visiting as much, however,
this has not impacted circulation.
A brochure on Tigard Public Library story time has been completed and will be distributed to
parents of pre-schoolers.
f
i
i
f
R
t
i
z � . > a .-•- .:�. .: -.. ��:. �
a-.
•
- r
Cl
Vf
ilk
y _
+ i
i. }
THE PURPOSE OF STORY TIME
Story Time provides children with an introduction to
literature and the oral tradition.
An introduction to culture features pictures, musical
activities, motor activities, various media, drama, games,
and other fun things to experience and do. Children are
given a chance before the stories to share experiences and
feelings and to receive positive reinforcement.
Children are exposed to the learning situation of being
in a group; the sharing, caring relationship with peers
that is an important part of the school experience as well
as part of "learning to become human." This also includes
being away from parents. We hope that young people learn
to love books and become highly motivated to read indepen-
dently. Parental support is a crucial part of that process.
l~ THE STORY TIME FORMAT
In addition to stories being read or performed from
books, many of our Story Times involve various media (such
as felt board and tell-and-draw stories) ; some revolve a-
round a theme, and others fit a pattern of "something old,
someth=ng new, something to do."
STORY TIME IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY. . .
At this time, Story Time is prepared and presented by
the Children's Librarian.
Books and materials are very carefully selected. Al-
though most picture book stories project a moral or lesson,
that is not the point, and specific moral values are not
emphasized. We aim for the more universal values such as
"be a caring person."
Tigard Public Library participates in Washington
County Cooperative Library Services, and some of our story-
telling materials come through the cooperative.
LIBRARY SERVICE FOR PRE-SCHOOLERS
Story Time is for children aged 3�-6. Parents may
stay with the child the first time if necessary. Regis-
tration is not currently required. Parents do not have to
stay in the library during Story Time, but pre-schoolers
must be attended at all other times.
Occasionally we will have special programs for pre-
schoolers or programs open to children of all ages. We
also do orientation programs for groups.
The library is limited in the service and materials
we can provide to toddlers. We encourage parents to check
s
out our "1 red dot" books to read to even the youngest.
We also recommend board books and cloth books which are f
not circulatable, but are available in many local stores.
You may find the following information, from Story-
telling far Pre-Schoolers, very useft.l: "2 year olds love
books and to be read to, but mosti •jl them are best off on a
one to one basis with the reader.
"3 year olds are usually ready for a brief group ex-
perience; their average attention span is about 10 minutes.
They enjoy recognizing forms, simple stories and rhymes, and
they love to ask questions.
"4 year olds can verbalize about the story they just
'read. ' They enjoy singing and their coordination is im-
proving.
"5 year olds have picked up about 90% of their working
vocabulary. They can sit well for a 20-30 minute storytime.
"This is generalized information; as you probably know. . .
children are delightfully uncategorizable!"
In our "E" or "I red dot" section we have beginning stor-
ies, stories without words, alphabet and counting books, and
object and concept identification books.
We have a parent's shelf located in the young people's
room with materials that will help you with children of all
ages.
STORY TIME FOR OLDER CHILDREN
In summer of 1982 we had Story Time for school-aged
children on Wednesdays at 2:00. We hope to continue this
popular program in future summers.
STORY TIME TIMES
Wednesdays 1:00- 1:30
Thursdays 10:00-10:30
October-August
There will be no Story Time during the week of Christmas.
i
TO: Members of the City Council ,�¢
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development U*V*/
DATE: January 13, 1983
RE: Monthly Report of Planning and Development - December
Attached please find the Planning and Development report for December,
1982. It contains the following elements:
1. Annexation Report
2. Approval Authority Actions
3. Building Activity
4. Code Enforcement Activity
5. Comprehensive Plan Update Report
6. Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington County
SUMMARY
The Building Division generated $8,840.15 in permit fees during November.
The total value of new constructions and alterations applied for was
$695,947.00.
Code Enforcement, Annexation Activity and Approval Authority Actions
continued.
Five elements of the Comprehensive Plan were adopted by Council during
December. The remaining elements will be considered by the Planning
Commission and City Council in January.
You will also find a description of the present status of our Urban
Planning Area Agreement with Washington County. We expect that the agreement
will be finalized by the end of February.
Alf r& #2.a
e
I ° ► 1 ► a r
�(ii { P J 0 { I 1 � 1°1r�1 JI��-I�P���l+{IPIJ1�l{I IIJIi�I���Jr�TjrntmJl�t.f����ri�TJ�-I��ili{'��11I°1!J°��°j1�°1°�°{�J��°{°P°�°1°Ill°JIo11llllltil°jfJ°I1I°III°1°{IIIJ11l{111111111°111�IF01��
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED .___ ___. _.. .I Z 3 4 _. _ $ s_ _ 7 8 9 to t t .. . 12
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN -
THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF TIE ORIGINAL - --
DRAWING.
0£ 62 sa 12 9Z SZ 4Z £t ZZ IZ OZ 6t 81 U 91 9I 41 £I
tNlJllll{IIHJIIII{IIIIJIIII{NIIJIIII�IIIiI{ tdlll 1 111111m-
a _..._ .-_._ ._
I lots
7 1 , 1990
_ --. !�
' I
N ..
PPL 1982
�d� A R E A \ .
ssg
��sssas �,•t`_ vii
1 t
J � -
set
II
1IIIIIII \ y`��__ I i
7LI
F
r�
�I". _. .
TIGA4lD
—.-- --
I
/� to
'f — _ - - ;®
I
■ a,..... w�seys Will. I I DURHAM
s M !
I
• �pllplgygl IIIIIp glllll IIIIIII III III III I(I 1 1 l i 1 1 1 1 T rill]1 11 V I I I
I I I I l t l l�Amin I I I I t I In t I Jill I I I i I Ignlllillnllnll1111n11gIIIpIII1tIpIlnllplq�lUlglllplrylllplqllryly/11"
IDLE: IF TNM NIMFII D - I _ Z 3 4 $ 6 7 !!8 0 �O 11 1'L
DR,WING IS LESS_It'0,.
TNIS NOTICE.IT IS I,TO
TIE OONLITY OF TIE ORIGINAL
ORNI ING.
Of B2 8Z LZ 9I2 SIIZ1Z fZ ZZ �IZ 02 BI 8�11I1--9.1'..I.1.S1Ib1�1 fl 211 II 01 6 B L 9 S b f 2 �I����1w
AlII1111I1111IIIIlI1 II INI�IIIIII14ry1ryI1NINN - IIIOI;J)I�OpIWNNtW1YtlIlYOYitlN111NII�NL11Y11 1 W4EIYINNII '
-�
M -
AR-CH
7 ` 1,990
=-- ,.,ice� �
G G G
� 4JO dJ
C4 C41 G+.)
=� ro AS om
E' U-4 U-4 U•a
Z w W w
W•.i N•.d U)-d
J $4 $4
O b 4Ja) 1+ a) Sa
U o) a) a) a) a) v
Z U Z U Z U
N M M M
b'..n co 00 00
.•1 l0 lD l0
::s Ln N N N
Q 'C�
U d
N 0 > G C G
n O tp rt3 (acn Z r3 r7 h
W
E
6
H N N N N
in p co W D
00 O
O N 4 J-)
•w ro U U U
U � O O O
W
N
Z N N N
Q E� U m co co
H )d 1+ al a%
G Q 7 N
Cl p'000 r r r
0Y'•rod.••i J.)
cn o' -d N U U U
U 3-4 O O O
N
n:
Q
p N
Q 00 m 00 co 00
Q H 0% a1 a1 a% m
W N -4 14 .-i r-4
Ea
U 554 4; i1 a) 4J dro) dam)
m d N E E d -'rod -rod -.rod
p W (n N U) q 4J 4J d-)
C C C
+4 +d -d y
Z -rl
O ,a, 41 41 41 U
H
aO� v m a% m v '�-1 C C C O
a t t ) ) m -u
O rd I N N
W a0 m c0 co c0 c0 00 co
W W W W a)
a w w w '
ro ro ro "
u dJ d-)
Z N N U)
O O
Ln b O d W
H d 3 ad 4-) 4J 4J -W -P -P co ra m C
Ex ) ) d b 0 0 0 a) 0 a! .-4 -4 rd 00 o
a
v a sro) E E 4 E ca ro E E E E CLI E '� -d +,
ro
�a .0d ) 0) 0 n °n ,, „ 0 0 0 0 0 o c c c U
W W U U U U U U ro ro
H
oa E E E E 41 V E V „ 43 V .0 � � u +) a+ o.
Z 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o o o a
U u U U c c U c c c c c c c c c c a c ro
O
� 1+
a)
-d
a d
'd9: 0 d 4 w
to X1 ca 4J 0
'A c � .� 1a yEn 0 to d U
W O O )") O H W G O Z
u m t 5 ld Ln r- U b a) H ld E
W � +) ro C ro C ") 41 U E 0
rt m aa)) >. aoi N c aci N 0 O V R .rod G
14 W b) -4 C 'D N N to C a)
W 11 C O C H >� RS ld >� C >� ••-1 ld C > .�{ rd 1+ 7
a o ro o d v 3 > to 3 v ro .� o o
C p C4 U to X S x a x > oo U w 0 m E 3 Z x
� � d.N3W.L2i1fd30 ZN3Wd0'I3A3Q aN`d JNINNK`Id - J,2iOd32i NOIyviX3NNti
MONTHLY REPORT
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL AUTHORITY ACTIONS
f DECEMBER 1982
The following projects were acted on by the Planning Commission over
the past month.
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION APPOINTMENTS
12-7-82 The Tigard Planning Commission forwarded the names of the
following individuals to the City Council with recommendation
for appointment to the appropriate NPOs .
Michael Smith NPO # 3
David Atkinson NPO # 6
Carolyn Eadon NPO # 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT
CPA 7-82 AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY
The Planning Commission voted unanimously by members present
to forward draft of AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY, to
the City Council , including corrections, modifications and the
revision as outlined in the memorandum from the Department of
Planning and Development, with recommendation for approval.
(December 7 , 1982)
CPA 8-82 ECONOMY
c. The Planning Commission voted unanimously by members present
to foward CPA 8-82 ECONOMY to City Council with recommendation
for approval, subject to the review and insertion of language
on LIDS. (December 7 , 1982)
CPA 8-82 ECONOMY - Language for LIDS
The Planning Commission voted unanimously by members present
to forward the language for LIDs to be inserted into CPA 8-82
ECONOMY with recommendation for approval. (December 9 , 1982)
CPA 9-82 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
The Planning Commission voted unanimously by members present
to foward CPA 9-82 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES to City
Council including corrections and modifications with
recommendation for approval. (December 1 1 , 1982)
The following projects were acted on by the Director of Planning and
Development during the month of December.
_MINOR LAND PARTITION
MLP 12-82 Pete & Carrie Janzen NPO # 6
APPLICANT: Pete and Carrie Janzen OWNER: Same
�• 9910 S .W. McDonald
Tigard, Oregon 97223
MONTHLY REPORT
PLANNING AND DEVELOPEMENT
PAGE 2
MLP 12-82 (continued)
REQUEST: To partition two lots containing 23 ,910 sq. ft. from the
proposed McDonald Arces Subdivision in an R-7 zone.
LOCATION: 9910 S .W. McDonald Ave. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11BA
lot 700)
ACTION TAKEN: Approved with conditions on December 29 , 1982 .
TEMPORARY USE PERMITS
TU 21 -82 Sherwood FFA (Conrad J. Underdahl)
REQUEST: To sell Christmas trees in the Safeway Parking Lot.
LOCATION: Corner of S .W. Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway
ACTION TAKEN: Approved December 6 , 1982.
TU 22-82 Richard D. Sowers - 16535 S .W. Roosevelt Ave. LO
REQUEST: To sell pictures in Fred Meyer Parking lot from December
4 , to December 24 , 1982 .
LOCATION : 11565 S.W. Pacific Highway
ACTION TAKEN: Approved December 13 , 1982 .
TU 23-82 Terrific Tigard Kiwanis
REQUEST: To sell Christmas Trees from December 3 , 1982 through
December 22 , 1982.
LOCATION: 11688 S.W. Pacific Hwy. (Adjacent Burger Boy)
ACTION TAKEN: Approved December 13 , 1982 .
TU 24-82 Pet Prevent-A-Care Inc.
REQUEST: To conduct a low-cost dog and cat vacination clinic.
Tentatively scheduled for Sunday Jan. 23rd - 2 :30 - 4 : 30 PM.
LOCATION: 11760 S.W. Hall Blvd. - 1st Interstate Bank
ACTION TAKEN: Approved December 21 , 1982 .
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1983
SUBJECT: Monthly report for month of December 1982 - Building Department
December's building activities include permits for 1 sign, 6 single family
residential, 4 residential additions alter/repair, 4 commercial alter/repair,
and 2 educational alter/repair for a total value of $695,947.00.
Fees for 16 permits $ 5,038.02
Fees foi 1 sign permit 25.00
Plumbing Activity - 21 1 ,567.50
Mechanical Activity - 25 567.63
Business Licenses 1,642.00
TOTAL. . . . . .. . . .. $ 8,840.15
Sewer Connections - 10 9, 150.00
Sewer Inspections - 10 360.00
There was no building activity in King City for the month of December.
C
z
0 000000000ol- 0000 0
H 0000000000 -' 0000 O
H M1D00 Ln [- -r Lf1N -' O -' C700t.C) t-O
Ln 1` N 1` N -r r- r- lD N CO O i- W
P-1 I'D Ln %D to m r N 00
� r r
U)
i >1
1 -N En
�4 )-d �4 �4 Q) }4
In a4
� � � � r-i r-A -1 � r-I r-I U) Q x
r co rorrj (a ccfc; r-1 r-4 ri r--1f"
•� • 4 -r1 •A •ri •r1 • 4 •r1 �4 Q fd (0 CC -r-i z
-N 4-3 4-) 4-3 +-) 4-3 4-3 4-J 4J 4-3 a) CO •4 -A -rq $4 0
SZ: f~ S� � Z f'. r_ 5:� SZ' r_ r-I 4J 0 0 0 �14 H O
w 0000 a) a) 0 (1) a) 0) xs, �4 )4s4 U) H o
P4 ro ro ro rc5 ro ro ro ro Rc$ ro Q a) (1) a) g a
H MU) �4Es 2 a N
WWWWWW WOO W04 W O O 0 �+ �
xxsxasxasxaasxcnsaUUU w
H
H
H 3
H x
U
C7 Q Q 4-4
En En
U
r>s
a M � � 0 0 Q) CC 4-) • mrd a
H 333 O O > a) • 0En +Ja > 4-3
3 !?!: ftc > 4-) x U) cn i
z � a � 0a) � � � a~ � rd ) a -N
Q a) (1) a) r-•I ri 4-) rC5 x M S~ S4 TI r-i N
(Y+ )-I �4 S4 M 43 4-) N r- 4-) }a r� -4 rd $-I H M fa
�r a) () a) N Z f~ r N -r (0 �4 Id 1s M CO �4 r
H En En En — Q) (1) M P4 sa 3 H 0 x 0 a
E-4 10
3333 3333 • 33 3 �4
U) to En U] U) 3 U) U) (n U) 3 U) 3 U) (n U) U) by
U) U) U) En U)
W LnoLno LnM "IUl Ln C) C:) M w H
l0 to N 00 Ln Ln -r -r ID N O ID O O r M 04
Q riMN -rOIDNN -r000N C>aN to Ca in
(::I C)
OOONI- I- -rNc- 00061NN N
rl r-i ri r-•1 r r- r-I rr r r- M c- 61 r- r di N
z N
-4 00
tp 01%
Q) 0 c-
U r-1 by h h �4 4-3
z H S-: M M U 4-3 �4
H
-r-I • -r-I N N U) (a a)
U) -4 Q U) 3
U) to 1~ (1) U) U) (1) \ a)
to U) U) )4 0 4-) U) r 1 r-1 10 U) U
P 34 �4 M �4 U U) >~ 'LS Q �4 a) s::: a)
a) a) a) rd (1) O �4 fu N tn O Q
10 rC$ rd r1 r-I W 0 U) ca r-I .1. 4-) < —1 O
,A r-4 rl GQ r1 H X tp O U >~ 4 f U
-rl -r1 -r1 r 1 \--I Ga •r1 O \ a) 34 U
ri :2: H Cl. 3 f� O a) s~
U) N a) b-I ra -r-1 0 to 0 O4 U) w O H •-
C4 $4 j4 }4 >y r► s- .s > U \U U 0 0 34 H a U)
o a) a (L) ::%) � fs ro O co p > r a z o
E-1 r-I r4 r1 �4 4 (15 O U ca U) •1-I >+r-♦ 0 O a H az
U
r-I r-♦ r•1 W U 0 >4 \ W ro f-. fd -4 H rm (L) w U 4-)
r1 •r1 •r i U) W 1~ 10 s~ H p (D p a r1
�a cn O r1 (1) -r1 c� p >1•r1 >~
H 3 () X a) U) O 1~ x —1 a) I-- W z E
Z ?+ >i > U r �4 74 c[S a) FC (0 A 4-) 0 z E
oU EA 'Dt-:) saahaxQ �CczH � fd x U) 0
U a
� rn
a) a
4J rn tT 7�4 0N
c ro o ro a 3 ;4 n 1
00 'O U, pl
yJ 4"1 Q 1 •r-1 N
N 113,
ill O N I
ro U M C N rt 13 U O
as i b e > E U b
..I ro 'd 41 a)•-1 o c ro Q)
N -I a) a' •r1 > N $a +�
s4 a ro ro 3 oID4ro
pami °,rO o. a) as w E 4J '1 s -i r1
U N O ;' O � m E Ln Q)w �' a
-.1 U r) .ri O = U U
W +1
Ems) r+ O W a � C
-,1 O N d a)
to o +3 u (3) c >
C r-
(3)
a)
5-1 3 4.0�' 3
N O C O U N
Z
m o ::$ 04 �4 rI Ln 44
a i
N O.0 � C -P J�-1 (1)4a
A cti' -0 0 a) ro b E
a)••-I r-4 (1)•-1 74 U O O S-i O ro 'Q) O 0
a) 3 3 O N4-) O U -4� a) U rOi CO
.11 •.1 ro W.--i � N
N 43j a ro +I
-ri
O o � > �'Rte. rd O ro >v N N co
4-) (L)M (1) U'O a) 4-) Q CO'o � h }4 '� )-1 C ,•'1
U) U ro t; O tP a) (1) ro +1
-H.-1 U � w c ro 4- -,i Lo a 3 U-ci.a 3 a aNi
C aJ ro rd O C w ' O > 'O 4-+ N N a
a) •rl a a) x 4-3 O w •.-I-A a) 1) 1-- b x
U
W.r4 RJ ri 1 -A Q) o + + ri S a) a)
4a ro-14 U (1) 44 ..a � .{..1 a) ro•r1 W (3) t3' U +1•,� )4 *`E
-4 'LS 41 -'-1 r-I •ri Y4 ro a3 �'--1 N -A 4-) a)•r1 ro a (1)
H V N � roJ- N O G l� 4S- ri U
o � 0 W •rl m N• (1) -) 1) � Z
O O G
x z �UZe ZE- U :4 H >cn z a a " o
o 00
= ao
W x :::5 'c
.11 g ro h
44
A ro
U r] 1
a)
E~ ro ro a) � ro F >
Z H ro U C N .%l -4 N �
W H N iS+a) .Lj a Q) a) a) a) N N f
r-I O a
a -4 rd N b N U •>i -moi X.L1
N b G N= a) C +) N W O
� ro a) a) a ro •-I
W = tp
i((
U U a ro 44 a W 1 � O f
r>+I >r
O O > ro � >,O to c-, w
~ U N � N W C +� tT U r- :J S4 tT 14
w H 1
b a) U C 'L3 a 0 -� x O N S1 4a =
ro N � •r1 O 7
W U E O 4J En 0� 3 U � -�-,I C O a) O 1
P x In IYa= O 3 G-1 D D a x
r
W �
O a)
U T5 r 3
0 b a. >4
x cu o „ a)
,-1 w
� Ei N
Oro X- a) U YI a)
a C:
H
r- 0 7 OI Pro, N N d U �>
o C'21 n a
HFC O U 'S 3 VJ En U •.NI N 00>
O cn Ln o O o In
N .
a a + O N N In r ON
O 00 r N a)
r c- r
O 1,,
S4 N N N O N N N
W NOD N 00 4-I 00 co 00
00 N co I 1
1 1 00 m
y In coIm Ol 1 co ON N r"1
W ro N fv1 r N N ; 3 1 1 1
a 'Ja CD
!J 1
MEMORANDUM
JANUARY 6, 1983
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATUS REPORT
To date five of the Comprehensive Plan Reports have been adopted. These
adopted reports include Citizen Involvement; Energy; Economy; Air, Water
and Land Resources ival_ity; and Public Facilities and Services. The remaining
unadopted elements of the Plan include: Housing; Transportation; Natural
Features and Open Space; Urbanization; the policy summary document ; and the
Comprehensive Plan Maps.
Some of the remaining unadopted documents are still being discussed with the
Neighborhood Planning Organizations (NPO) and the Committee for Citizen
Involvement (CCI). The CCI will meet on January 11 and 13 to discuss any
remaining issues.
The Planning Commission public hearings for the remaining elements of the
Comprehensive Plan will be held on January 18, 20 and 22, and the Council will
begin their review during the following week.
i
dmj
(0057P)
i
MEMORANDUM
January 6, 1983
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Status of Tigard's Urban Planning Area Agreement with Washington
County
As you are aware, the existing Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with
Washington County has been in effect since March, 1980. As part of Tigard's
and Washington County's comprehensive planning efforts, a new UPAA will be
negotiated.
During the summer and fall of last year the County and the cities of
Washington County worked on the basic language of the UPAA, with the
understanding that the specifics of each jurisdictions UPAA would be
negotiated with the County during the winter. Staff met with the County
planning staff in early December to discuss the specifics of Tigards UPAA.
( These specifics include:
1. The area south of lower Scholls Ferry Road and west of S.W. 135th be
included within Tigard's Urban Planning Area (UPA) ;
2. Annexations to the city within the Urban Planning Area will not be
opposed by the County ;
3. Annexations to the City outside the Urban Planning Area will not be
supported by the county or city;
4. The county will not approve a land use proposal in the Urban Planning
Area if the city presents evidence to show that the proposal would
not facilitate an urban level of development in the future upon
annexation to the city;
5. The city or county shall not approve the extension of city or Unified
Sewerage Agency (USA) sewer lines beyond the Tigard city limits
except where the annexation applications for those properties have
been submitted to the city or where a non—remonstrance agreement to
annex those properties has been signed and recorded with Washington
County and submitted to the City or where there is a potential or
imminent health hazard; and
6. The city has declared "Areas of Interest" (see map) The county shall
send notice to the city for response in accordance with the agreement
for specified developmen proposed within these "Areas of Interest".
Due to the County's work programs, the County has decided to delay finalizing
Tigard's new UPAA until after the City has completed its adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan. However, since there is an urgency to include the
property west of S.W. 135th within the City's UPA, the County has agreed to
amend the map of the UPAA to include this property. The remaining items 2 - 6
(except # 5) are included in the existing UPAA.
Staff anticipates that this amendment in the City 's existing UPAA will be
completed within the next 6 weeks.
This memorandum is informational only, an no action is necessary at this time.
s
a
Y
Y
1
i
E
r
6
F.'
t
dmj
(0056P)
C
s
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL j
i
FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR s
DATE: JANUARY 13 , 1983
f
SUBJECT: MACC/CATV REPORT
[k
k
At its January 5 , 1983 meeting, the MACC Board elected officers
for 1983: Jack Nelson (Mayor, Beaverton) , Chairman; Connie
Fessler (Assistant to City Manager, Forest Grove) , Vice-Chairman;
and Harold Campbell (Mayor , Lake Oswego) , Secretary-Treasurer.
Forest Grove introduced its new Board representative, their new
City Manager Mike Solomon. Connie Fessler will be their
Alternate.
Construction is proceeding throughout the area and according to
MACC Administrator Bill Tierney, is on contract schedule at this
rate. Tigard' s construction progress as of last month is
attached, but is actually well beyond that point already this
month. Important to our system is the progress in Beaverton
with their headend now energized and sales underway. Regarding
sales in Tigard, I ' ll ask Council to consider an amendment to
our Greenriver Ordinance on door-to-door sales.
The City of Rivergrove has applied for MACC membership. I
recommend that the City Council pass the required resolution.
RWJ : dkr
Attachments
v-
'i
METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
CONSTRUCTION REPORT
MONTH OF December, 1982
i
® CABLE CONSIRCTION SYST9-1 TOTALS
• ESIDENTIAL
ADDlied Issued
Permits This Month 43 4
Total to Date 180 82
Total Required 236
f:
Aerial Under round Total
Cable Placed This Month 17.40 17.99 35.39
Total to Date 43.30 49.89 93.19
Total Required
L
Aerial Under round Total
Cable Energized This Month 8.61 5.58 14.19
Total to Date 8.61 5.58 14.19
Total Required
• INSTITUTIONAL
Aerial Underground Total
Cable Placed This Month
Total to Date
Total Required
Aerial Under round Total
e 1
Cable Energized This Month
Total to Date
Total Required
wave �Gr r _=4 VC - =i C- _ C4 - - -
Under construction, exterior walls
being constructed
sq - _ _ S 7 0 r', .
Under construction - -
3. Hi st-ro: ':a J j}Q i
i �,Ji7C sq. ft. , single szor- .
F
pain Street Extension near ;?th
E
Under construction. Exterior walls complete,
working on interior
r
4. Tigard: Hub Site.
2,Gg0 sq. ft sincie st'3rv. ,
� �l'�. .,nth �SGUt!": •l7 f �;,ne 1 rit_r�^...,.;or. ;�
hall^Blvd. and Curhar- Road; .
i
Under construction. Exterior walls complete, s
working on interior.
5. !•:ashington County: Bair Headend.
3,c00 sq. `t. , single story.
E
Sl:. 173rd south, OT Cornell Road
pre pesed-Qbadfa+i-t-£esaeess-£a pe{.
Under construction, headend section, that
is where the equipment is located, is
enclosed and equipment installed.
I
0= December, 1982
• -'Sy �l?,'� it��i i�}ti TIGARD
i
• ?-`T'-I,r'11,!
t
?Gr::l i is his 'forth 1
1 o l.al ,.o Ua l.e F
I
Tot3i r_quired
,e�-i al ' nderaround Tctal
t
Cable Placed This MonthE5.
.75 i 6.06
-o-a1 tc Dte I .75 6.06
}
Total Required
i
4
Aerial Underaround Total
Cable Energized This Month
Total to Date
Total Required �
• I�.�TITUT I ORAL
Aerial Underground Total
Cable Placed This Month
Total to Date
Total Required
Aerial Underground Total
Cable Energized This Month _
Total to Date
f Total Required
9
6
BETTING ER KRUPNICK & ASSOCIATES
Mayor Wilbur Bishop January 3, 1983
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR. 97223
Dear Wilbur;
I would like to submit my resignation from the Tigard Urban
Renewal Advisory Comittee. As a result of recent demands upon my time
resulting from various needs of my practice as well as a new addition
to my family, I no longer have the time to give the position that it
truly deserves. ( Elizabeth and I had a baby boy on Dec. 26 )
Over the past 18 months I have enjoyed working with the comitte`,
various citizens, as well as city employees. In leaving I give you my
best regards and truly hope that the city will be able to enact some
of the goals for urban renewal in the near future.
very truly yours,
L
Lou Krupnick
C.C. Bob Jean
408 SSV SECOND AVENUE. SUITE 511, PORTLAND, OR 97204 503.220-0569
MEMORANDUM '7
January 12, 1983
TO: City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: OLCC License Renewals
RE: 1. L'ECURIE RESTAURANT
12386 S.W. Main St. , Tigard .
2. LONE OAK RESTAURANT
11920 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard
s
® Sir:
The above license requests are renewals of existing businesses, and
there is no change in the class of license requested.
Therefore, it is recommended that both license applications be
approved and forwarded to O.L.C.C.
i
Respectfully, •
.B. Adams
Chief of Police
RBA:ac
i
This is a model resolution; to assist Commission members in developing
a document for approving both the entrance of the City of Riverarove
into M.A.C.C. and authorizing the amendment of the Franchise Agreement
to make Rivergrove a party. It is important to remember that although
this may meet the ordinance requirements of Beaverton, it may not be
entirely appropriate for other jurisdictions. Commissioners should
forward it -to legal counsel within their communities to assure that it
meets that jurisdiction' s ordinance, charter or other rec,uirements.
RESOLUT IO., ^j0.
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING THE CITY OF BEAVERTON'S AUTHORIZATION
FOR THE AMENDMENT OF BOTH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
ENTITLED, "INTERGOVERV-1ENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT -
METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION" AND THE
ADOPTED CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM FRANCHISE AGREEME11T
TO PERMIT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF RIVERGROVE, OREGON
TO BECOME A MiEMBER OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNICATIONIS
COMMISSION AND A PARTY TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the Cable Communications System
Franchise Agreement (hereafter Franchise Agreement) between the jurisdictions
participating in the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission (hereafter
Commission) and Storer Metro Communications, Inc. (hereafter Grantee) , and sub-
sequent to acceptance of the Franchise Agreement by Grantee and approval by the
Commission of the construction schedule submitted by Grantee, the City of
Rivergrove, Oregon, requested by letter that it be permitted to become a member
of the Commission by amendment of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement -
Metropolitan Area Communications Commission (hereafter Intergovernmental
Agreement) , and further, by amendment of the adopted Franchise Agreement, that it
become a party to the Franchise Agreement with Grantee; and
RESOLUTION NO.
C .
S
r' WHEREAS, Section O.C. of the Intergovernmental Agreement provides that
the Commission may allow other, units of local government to enter into the
Intergovernmental Agreement, subject to the possible imposition of an entrance
fee or cost; and
.41HIEREAS, it would constitute an amendment of the Intergovernmental
Aareement to add the City of Rivergrove as a member of the Commission and
Section S. E. of the intergovernmental Agreement requires written authorization
by the aovernina bodies of all members of the Commission for any amendment to
the Inter•covernmental Agreement subsequent to Commission approval of the Request
for Proposal ; and -
INHEREAS, it would constitute an amendment of the Franchise Agreement adopted
by the jurisdictions comprising the Commission to allow the City of Rivergrove,
Oregon, to enter into and become a party to the Franchise Agreement with
Grantee, and such amendment requires the written concurrence of the governing
body of each member jurisdiction of the Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Riverqrove City Council , by Resolution has
authorized Rivergrove's entering into the Intergovernmental Aareement, ratified
and approved Commission Resolution Nos. 80-1 ; 81-2 to 81-6 and 82-2 to 82-7, which
amended the original Intergovernmental Agreement, and Resolution 82-1 , which
approved the construction schedule submitted by Grantee and established
February 10, 1982, as the effective date of the Franchise and has appointed a
Commissioner and an Alternate Commissioner to represent the City; and
RESOLUTION NO. Page 2
C
:-WHEREAS, Storer P"etro Communications, Inc. has agreed in k;ritina that
the addition of the City of Rivergrove to the Commission and as a party to the
Franchise Agreement would not necessitate or resulI in any change or amendment
to its proposal , Franchise Agreement or construction schedule in any way or
manner whatsoever, as such propos-al , franchise agreement- or approved con-
struction, schedule applies or requires performance by grantee to any existing
member jurisdiction of the Commission, and whereas a copy of said Agreement
by Grantee is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and by reference incorporated
into this resolution as though fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has considered the request and tentatively agreed
on February 10, 1942, to amend both the Intergovernmental Agreement and the
adopted Franchise Agreement, providing the governing bodies of all members of
the Commission authorize and concur with such amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council having considered the matter and having deemed
it to be in the best interest and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Beaverton to authorize the amendments to the Intergovernmental Agreement and the
Franchise Agreement by allowing the City of Rivergrove, Oregon, to join the
Commission as a full member and become a party to the Franchis6 Agreement;
now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF BEAVERTON, OREGON AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1 . The Commission is hereby authorized by the City of Beaverton
to amend the Intergovernmental Agreement and Franchise Agreement as necessary
RESOLUTION N0. Page 3
C
i
to allow the City of Rivergrov_ , Oregon, to enter into the Intergovernmental
Agreement and become a full member of the Commission and become a party to the
Franchis Agreement, with all the attendant rights, duties and obligations
arising from both Agreements, such authorization and concurrence being given
in accordance with and as required by Section 9.E. of the Intergovernmental
Aareement and Section of the adopted Franchise Agreement.
Section 2. The City Council , by this Resolution, understands and agrees
that should any subsequent events arise which the Commission deems to be
sufficient to preclude such amendments to the Intergovernmental Agreement
and Franchise Agreement, the Commission may decide not to amend the Agreements _
in such a manner.
Section 3. The City Recorder shall deliver forthwith a true copy of this
Resolution to the Administrator of the Commission, 4950 SW. Hall Blvd. ,
f
Beaverton, OR 97005.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Beaverton, Oregon this
day of 1982.
Ayes: Nays:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
MARY CARDER, City Recorder JACK R. NELSON, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. Page 4
METROPOLITAN AREA
COMMUNIC ALTI®NS COMMISSION
P.O. Box 1057 4950 SAV_ Hall Blvd. Beaverton.
Re 1 3 1983
January 11 , 1983
TO: MACC Board Members
FROM: Bill Tierney/;4 _
Enclosed is the letter from Storer-Metro indicating their commit-
ment to serving the Rivergrove area.
This letter should be attached as Exhibit A to your resolution
amending the Intergovernmental Agreement and authorizing Rivergrove
to become a member of MACC.
gP
Enclosure
EXHIBIT A
COMMUNICATIONS. INC.
January 4, 1983
Mr. William J. Tierney
MACC Administrator
P. O. Box 1957
4950 SW Hall Blvd.
Beaverton, OR 97075
Dear Bill,
This letter is to reconfirm the Storer Metro commitment to provide
service to the residents of River Grove, Oregon, under the same
agreement as for other MACC communities.
The size of this community and its location should not be a problem
to us in meeting original construction deadlines for the MACC service
areas. However, we feel a certain obligation to original MACC members
to see that time commitments for construction are not changed signif-
icantly as a result of this added responsibility.
Sincerely,
W. Douglas ilson
Oregon Area M-nager
WDW/ct
C
7100 S.W. HAMPTON ST. a SUITE 231 COMMERCE PARK
TIGARD, OR 97223 • 639-1197
f
i_
B
g
k
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development
DATE: January 13, 1982
RE: NPO APPOINTMENTS
The NFO interview team has interviewed the following he prospective
ospective
members and recommended membership approval
ng
Commission.
NAME ADDRESS NPO
Dennis R. Russell 12020 S.W. 95th Ave. 2
Thomas R. Woodward 11970 S.W. Lincoln 2
Bill Bieker 7730 S.W. Cherry St. 5
On January 4, 1983, the Planning Commission voted to recommend
that the City Council approve these three applicants.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the appointments
of these individuals to the NPO's specified.
dmj
(0091T)
MM
N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUgSTION: What are NPO•s?
A\,sVF:R: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
.I:e Comprehensive_ Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City-plans; policies, projectincludingr butinot limited
affecting the livability of the neighborhood.-
to, land use, zoning, housing. community, facilities. human resources,
social _and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
social
quality. open space and parks; to participate in the process
of devermining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific-project plans; to'keep the neighborhood informed;to to seek
the
neighborhood opinion on iss:�es brought before them,
views of the neighborhood in matters oL extra neighborhood importance_
PLSASE- COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW .
1 Ty
A
I�AdiE DDRESS /`���L
77_
/
TELEPHONE NUMBER Bus.) f �7� �� ( Res.) Z Z� Zn3 70
PRESENT OCCUPAATIION
FI RU NAME
NOV., LONG HAVE YOU. BEEN �I OYED WITH THIS FIRM?_
IS THIS COMPANY "LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO
HAVE YOU BEEN..INVOLVED B'ITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? -1VU
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN�YOUR INVOLVEMENT: l
ti
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A bIEMOER OF SAN NPO?
r _
~ / .�/S 4�� % �' �4 'Tia•U 2F /✓/r'
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _
DAVI-I iib: TELEPIIO\F. NU.%10ER &a:5_ 4. Z:3 -,51,6
.:z 3 2 ,
N P O A P P L I C A T I O Nt
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
r
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plaits; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including-, but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality. open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
Yi,6 SL C;OK-PLE.l'E THE QUESTIONS BELOW
NAME d/Ak*S d��/ � ADDRESS ��/�U s���//✓�
oe
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) Y �"CO 1�7� _ (Res.) &G?0-/q7�Q
PRESENT OCCUPATION?
FIRM NAME
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? ��n
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE?
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO?
t`.DI)JTIONAL COMMENTS:
DAYTIMP TELEPIiONF. NUMBER
INVENTORY OF CI
'i'IZt:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the City Council
/ 'nom
FROM: William A. Monahan
DATE: January 14, 1983
SUBJECT: Floodplain/Greenway/Open Space Policy
On November 5, 1982 Frank Currie and I discussed with you the issues in-
volved with Tigard's conflicting Floodway/Greenway policies. It is hoped
that through the comprehensive planning process we will be able to clarify
these conflicting policies while establishing a policy on economic develop-
ment as it relates to sensitive land areas. Following consideration by
the Planning Commission, the Natural Features and Open Space Element of
the plan will be presented for your review including the floodway discussion.
During our discussions, which should take place on January 24, the issue
should be settled.
Attached for your review and consideration are the following:
1. Floodway/Greenway Policy Discussion - the material submitted to
you last November.
2. CCI Proposed Floodway Policies Approved January 13, 1983 - the
latest version of the floodway policies which will appear in the
draft Natural Features and Open Space Element which will be
considered by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 18, 1983.
The CCI policies represent a compromise between the NPO's which would like
to preserve the floodplain without allowing selective economic development
in the floodplain and the staff view that some encroachment should be
allowed if engineered properly and justified. The compromise contains
standards for preserving the floodway and protecting neighborhoods.
At your meeting on Monday evening I will address the existing problems
with our policies, the CCI proposal, and staff's concerns.
C
FLOODWAY / GREENWAY POLICY DISCUSSION
Over the past several months a possible conflict between provisions
of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to Floodplain and city policy
concerning Greenways has been identified. There is a need for review
of definitions , established policies and community needs in order
that the City Council may determine the appropriate course of action
for the future. Following is a brief description of the problem which
staff will elaborate on at the City Council meeting tonight.
Floodway - The channel of a river or other watercourse and
the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in
order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively
increasing the water surface elevation.
Floodplain - The relatively flat area or lowland adjoining
the channel of a river , stream, watercourse or
other body of water which has been or may be
covered by floodwaters within the area of
applicability defined by the floodplain district.
(18 .57 .020) (6)
Floodplain District - Those areas within the City of Tigard
inundated by the 100 year regulatory flood.
(18 .57 .020) (7)
Regulatory Flood - The flood used to define the outer boundary
lines of the floodplain district. The maximum
flood predicted to occur within 100 years .
(18 .57 .020) (11)
Greenway - Means all lands within the one-hundred-year flood-
plain of Fanno Creek and the Tualatin River and
the lands on either side of natural drainageways
as designated by the Park Board and Comprehensive
Plan for preservation. (18 . 57 .020) (9)
PROBLEM
Both the floodplain and greenway are defined as the area in which
flooding during a 100 year storm takes place. When a property owner
chooses to apply for a special use permit to perform work in the flood-
plain under Tigard Municipal Code 18 . 57, he is led to believe that it
is possible to receive a permit if he meets the standards presented in
18. 57.070 . The standard reads as follows :
S
18. 57 .070 Standards . (a) Application for a special use
permit in floodplain areas shall be granted or denied in
accordance with the following standards:
(1) No structure, fill, excavation, storage or
other use shall be permitted which alone or in combination
t with existing or proposed uses would reduce the capacity of
the floodplain area or raise either the flood surface
elevation or flow rates , or adversely affect flow direction
on upstream or downstream properties , or create a present
or foreseeable hazard to public health, safety and general
welfare.
(2) The applicant must obtain the permit required
by the state of Oregon under ORS Chapter 541 for removal or
filling of waterways , or demonstrate that the provisions of
this statute do not apply.
A problem arises when the City greenway policy seems to govern
the same land that is earmarked for filling the the welands .
The question then is posed, "If the area of the 100 year flood-
plain is also designated to remain as public greenway, how
can the City grant a Sensitive Lands Permit in the floodplain
�
thus changing the boundary of the greenway. " That is , land
which becomes buildable or usable as the result of filling
will be utilized for some economic use thus making is unavail-
able for public use. This results in reduced greenway area.
( The creation of additional economically useful land is of prime
concern to Tigard. Much of the area which is designated flood-
plain is either in a commercial or industrial zone. Carefully
engineered filling could either allow for expansion of a business
use at some sites or actually be the deciding factor whether
or not a piece of land has sufficient buildable land to site a
commercial or industrial building. Whether such engineered filling
will be allowed is up to the City Council.
GREENWAY POLICY
Policy 7 of the Environmental Design and Open Space Plan adopted
by the Tigard City Council in 1977 reads :
POLICY 7 . Retain the 100 year flood plain of Fanno Creek, its
tributaries and the Tualatin River as an open preserve
(Greenway) . The Greenway shall be established as the
backbone of the open space network and when a direct
public benefit can be derived, i.e. , adjacent residen-
tial development, the Greenway should be developed for
passive recreation and pedestrian/bike travel.
Page 2
It appears that current City policy, governing land along Fanno
Creek will not allow any development within that floodplain. Thus , if
the greenway policy is to govern as the prevailing policy of the City,
this pre-empts the use of the Sensitive Lands Permit process within the
100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek making it impossible to receive a
permit to expand the amount of useable land in Tigard.
ALTERNATIVES
The Alternatives available to the City Council are:
1. Take no action - as a result the Sensitive Lands
process as it relates to the Fanno Creek and other
areas , will continue to conflict with the established
Greenway Policy.
2. Revise the Greenway Policy - the policy can be revised
to allow adjustment of the greenway zone in conformance
with any floodplain zone changes accomplished through
the Sensitive Lands process .
CONSIDERATIONS
If the policy and code conflict is not resolved it is likely that
litigation will result to force the City to resolve this apparent inequity.
Until that scenario unfolds, property owners and City staff are not in
a position to adequately explain City policy or determine the status of
land in the floodplain as potenial buildable land. The situation also
makes it difficult for staff to assess the amount of land available for
economic development expansion. Further , it creates yet another
administrative roadblock that may deter a company from locating or
expanding in Tigard.
Page 3
�. ��g� �� mow► �v
-31
u
'r-&UC31` 3. 2. 2- GP4� t S�1S I z✓1�
I,d ONE 51�� IS �N�UD
�z-
Cal�t ti��1�� �- ► ��( �f�- I tJ►���TF'14l__. JSP �
G�nnN+�E-lam d� l tJi�sT�l�l_ �.
�� ��(�►-� 'Sl Alm G�'�-� ��S�a �
�-�P-� G�� ►oto ���- or�—
s
E
a
t
3.2 . 2-
�
�►�-�n�1�' A� D�o� lict�t►� -tom l�-
A VJPtI
f
r
4
Y�N1NC� I-IV ����'� AT �
�LAI PA-
t
18. 57 . 010
property be removed. The city council, at the written
request of the applicant, may grant an extension of time
to allow construction. (Ord. 80-94 §1 (part) , 1980) .
Chapter 18 . 57
SENSITIVE LANDS
Sections :
18 . 57 .010 Statement of intent.
18 . 57 .020 Definitions .
18 . 57. 030 Permitted uses .
18 . 57 .040 Uses and activities allowed with a special
use permit.
18. 57 .050 Nonconforming uses .
18 . 57. 060 Sensitise lands permit.
18. 57. 070 Standards.
18. 57. 080 Floodplain district.
18. 57 . 090 Federal Flood Insurance Program.
18 . 57 . 200 Enforcement.
18. 57. 010 Statement of intent. Sensitive lands are
( lands potentially unsuitable for development because of
location within the one-hundred-year floodplain, within a
natural drainageway, or on steep slopes . Sensitive land
areas are designated as such in order to give recognition
to the need to protect the public health, safety and welfareN
of the community through the regulation and control of lands
within floodplains , drainageways, and steeply-sloping land
areas , and to thereby mitigate potential financial burdens '
arising from flood damage loss and to preserve natural
drainageways from encroaching uses which threaten to affect
adversely the property rights of the citizenry of the com-
munity, public safety, and the public health by natural
conditions arising from upstream or downstream flood levels .
City actions under this chapter will recognize the rights
of riparian owners to be free to act on the part of the
city, its commissions , representatives and agents , and land-
owners and occupiers.
The floodplain district has for its purpose the preserva-
tion of natural water storage areas within the floodplain dis-
trict by discouraging or prohibiting imcompatible uses. (Ord.
79-73 §1 (part) , 1979 : Ord. 79-46 §1 (part) , 1979 : Ord. 74-50A
§1 (part) , 1974) .
292-2 (Tigard 8/82)
18 . 57 . 020
18. 57. 020 Definitions . In this chapter the following
words -and phrases shall be construed to have the specific
meanings assigned to them as follows :
( . 5) "Devele-ment" means construction of a building
including modular or mobile homes or any alteration or modifi-
cation thereof , t-lling, excavating, paving, mining , dredging
or grading.
(1) "Drainageways" are defined as those areas which x
convey significant seasonal concentrations of water over
the surface of the land.
(2) "Excavation" means mechanical removal of earth
material.
(3) "Fill" means any act by which earth, sand, gravel,
rock or any other similar material is deposited, placed,
pulled or transported, and includes the conditions resulting
therefrom.
(4) "Flood" means a temporary rise in stream flow or
stage that results in water overtopping stream banks and
inundating land adjacent to the normal flow of water through
the stream channel.
(5) "Flood hazard" means a danger to property or health
as the result of inundation of the floodplain.
(6) "Floodplain" means the relatively flat area or
lowlands adjoining the channel of a river, stream, water-
course or other body of water which has been or may be
covered by floodwaters within the area of applicability
defined by the floodplain district.
(7) "Floodplain district" means those areas within the
city of Tigard inundated by the one-hundred-year regulatory
flood.
(8) "Grading" means any excavation or filling or
combination thereof.
(9) "Greenway" means all lands within the one-hundred-
year floodplain of Fanno Creek and the Tualatin River and the
lands on either side of natural drainageways as designated by
the park board and comprehensive plan for preservation.
(9 . 5) "Habitable Structure" means any structure usable
for living purposes, which includes working, sleeping, eating,
cooking or recreation or a combination thereof. A structure
used only for storage purposes is not a "habitable structure. "
(10) "Obstruction" means any dam, wall , embankment, levee,
dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modifica-
tion, bridge, conduit, culvert, building, gravel, refuse,
fill, structure, matter or things of a similar nature in,
along, or across or projecting into any channel, watercourse,
or floodplain drainageway areas which may impede, retard
or change the direction of the flow of water, either by itself
or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water,
or that is placed where the flow of water might carry the
same downstream to the damage of health or property.
_ l
292-3 (Tigard 8/82)
18 . 57 . 030
t
(11) "Regulatory flood" means the flood used to define
the outer boundary lines of the floodplain district. The
maximum flood predicted to occur within one hundred years.
(12) "Steeply sloping lands" means portions of the
ground surface which have a slope of twelve percent or
greater.
(13) "Structure" means constructed edifice, barrier
or building of any kind, or any artificial build-up or com-
position of physical parts adjoined together. (Ord. 82-14
Sl (part) , 1982 ; Ord. 82-04 §1 (b) , 1982 ; Ord. 79-73 Sl (part) ,
1979 : Ord. 79-46 Sl (part) , 1979 : Ord. 79-10 §5 , 1978 ; Ord.
74-50A 51 (part) , 1974) .
18 . 57.030 Permitted uses . Except as provided by
Section 18 . 57 .040 , the following uses shall be permitted
within sensitive lands:
(1) Greenways.
(A) Community recreational uses such as bicycle and
pedestrian paths , archery ranges or unpaved athletic fields
or parks ;
(B) Public conservation areas for water, soil , open
space, forest or wildlife resources ;
(C) Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, blackberry
or any other noxious vegetation.
(2) Floodplain District and Drainageways .
(A) Accessory uses such as lawns , gardens or unpaved
play areas ;
(B) Agricultural uses conducted without locating a
structure in the floodplain district;
(C) Community recreational uses such as bicycle and
pedestrian paths, archery ranges , or unpaved athletic fields
or parks ;
(D) Public and private conservation areas for water,
soil, open space, forest or wildlife resources ;
(E) Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, black-
berry or any other noxious vegetation.
(3) Drainageways.
(A) Fences ;
(B) Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, black-
berry or any other noxious vegetation.
(4) Steeply Sloping Lands.
(A) Low-intensity recreational uses such as bicycle
and pedestrian paths ;
(B) Landscaping or gardens which provide substantial
vegetative cover;
(C) Public and private conservation areas for water,
soil, open space, forest or wildlife resources ;
(D) Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, black-
berry or any other noxious vegetation.
(5) Except as explicity authorized by other provisions
of this chapter., all other uses are prohibited on sensitive
i lands.
292-4 (Tigard 8/82)
18 . 57 . 040--18 . 57 . 060
(6) Modification by grading shall not alter the character
of lands for the purposes of this chapter. Land which in its
natural state lay within the floodplain, or was steeply sloping
shall continue to have that legalcharacter, though grading
may have altered the surface condition. (Ord. 79-73 §1 (part) ,
1979 : Ord. 79-46 Sl (part) , 1979 : Ord. 74-50A 51 (part) , 1974) .
18 57 040 Uses and activities allowed with a special
use permit. The following uses and activities are allowed
only by special use permit granted by the planning commission
and based on the standards set forth in Section 18 . 57 .060 :
(1) Within drainageways/greenways and steeply sloping
lands :
(A) Fill, grading, excavating,
(B) Structures ,
(C) Off-street parking and maneuvering areas , access-
ways and service drives located on the ground surface ,
(D) Roadways, bridges or utility facilities ,
(E) Removing anv live vegetation other than poison
oak, tansy ragwort, blackberry or any other noxious vegetation;
(2) within the floodplain/greenways only:
(A) Any temporary structure which is not habitable and
by its nature, can be readily removed from the floodplain area
during periods of flooding, and which would impede or interfere
with the flow of waters within the district,
(B) Any change in the topography or terrain which
would change the flow of waters during flooding periods , or
which would increase the flood hazard or alter the direction
or velocity of the floodwater flow. (Ord. 82-14 51 (part) ,
1982; Ord. 79-73 91 (part) , 1979 : Ord. 79-46 §1 (part) , 1979 :
Ord. 74-50A §1 (part) , 1974) .
18. 57 . 050 Nonconforming uses . A use established
prior to June 1, 1979 , which would be prohibited by this
chapter or which would be subject to the limitations and
controls imposed by this chapter shall have nonconforming
use status, and be subject to the provisions of Chapter
18. 68 of this code. The benefits of nonconforming use
status shall not, however, be available to uses or con-
ditions established or created in violation of any statute,
ordinance, or law in effect at the time of establishment
or creation. (Ord. 79--73 §1 (part) , 1979 : Ord. 79-46 51
(part) , 1979 : _ Ord. 74-50A §1 (part) , 1974) .
18 . 57. 060 Sensitive lands permit. A sensitive lands
permit shall be obtained before development begins within
the floodplain district as established in Section 18 . 57 . 080.
Application for a sensitive lands permit shall be made on forms
furnished by the planning director.
292-5 (Tigard 8/82)
18 . 57. 070
In accordance with the procedures and requirements set forth
in Chapter 18. 84 , an application for a sensitive lands permit
filed as by said chapter stated may be approved or denied by
the approval authority following a public hearing.
All applications for a sensitive lands permit shall be supported
by the following information to enable the approval authority
to determine whether the proposed use is located in floodplain,
drainageway or steep slope areas :
(1) Floodplain.
(A) Plans drawn to scale, submitted in triplicate
as prepared by a registered professional engineer with expe-
rience in hydraulic and geohydrologic engineering and processes,
showing the nature, location, dimensions, elevations and topo-
graphy of the site; the location of existing and proposed
structures located upon the site, existing and proposed areas
to be filled or otherwise modified, and the relationship of
these to the location of the stream channel , and proposed
methods for controlling erosion;
(B) Any documentation, photographs , water marks, and
similar evidence offered in support of the claim tha'- the
site or area in question lies above high water as de. ined
by the regulatory flood.
(2) Drainageways. �[
(A) Plans drawn to scale, submitted in triplicate 1
as prepared by a registered professional engineer with ex-
perience in hydraulic and hydrologic engineering and pro-
cesses, showing the nature, location, dimensions , elevations
and topography of the site; and location of existing and
proposed structures located upon themsite; existing and
proposed fill or excavated areas , and the relationship of
these to the location of the stream channel (if any) , and .
b
the proposed methods of controlling erosion.
(3) Steep Slopes .
(A) Plans drawn to scale, submitted in triplicate
as prepared by a qualified registered professional engineer =:
showing the nature, location, dimensions , elevations , and h
topography of the site; the location of existing and proposed {
structures located upon the site, existing and proposed fill
or excavated areas and proposed methods of controlling erosion.
(Ord. 82-04 Sl (c) , 1982 : Ord. 79-73 91 (part) , 1979 : Ord.
79-46 §1 (part) , 1979 : Ord. 74-50A §1 (part) , 1974) .
P
18. 57 .070 Standards . (a) Application for a special
use permit in floodplain areas shall be granted or denied
in accordance with the following standards :
(1) No structure, fill, excavation, storage or
other use shall be permitted which alone or in combination
with existing or proposed uses would reduce the capacity of
the floodplain area or raise either the flood surface
elevation or flow rates, or adversely affect flow direction
292-5a (Tigard 8/82) i
i
4
k
18 . 57 . 080--18 . 57 . 090
on upstream or downstream properties , or create a present
or foreseeable hazard to public health, safety and general
welfare.
(2) The applicant must obtain the permit required
by the state of Oregon under ORS Chapter 541 for removal or
filling of waterways , or demonstrate that the provisions of
this statute do not apply .
(b) Application for a special use permit in a drain-
ageway area shall be granted or denied in accordance with
the following standard:
The proposed action must not adversely impact runoff,
erosion, ground stability, water quality , groundwater level,
flow rates or flooding.
(c) Application for a special use permit in a steeply
sloping land area shall be granted or denied in accordance
with the following standard:
Applicant must supply affirmative documentation that
the proposed action will not adversely impact runoff, erosion,
ground stability, water quality, groundwater level , or
flooding; and that the site can support the propo-cPd mod-
ification or structure as designed. (Ord. 79-73 §1 (part) ,
1979 : Ord. 79-46 §1 (part) , 1979 : Ord. 74-50A §1 (part) ,
1974) .
18. 57 . 080 Floodplain district. The floodplain district
r` identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a
' scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance
Study for the City of Tigard, Oregon date September 1, 1981,
with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Boundary
- Floodway Maps is adopted by reference and declared to be a
part of this chapter. The Flood Insurance Study is on file
in the office of the city recorder at Tigard City Hall.
This section does not imply that land outside the area of
floodplain districts or uses permitted within such districts
will be free from flooding or flood damages. (Ord. 82-04 §1
(a) , 1982) .
18. 57 . 090 Federal Flood Insurance Program. On March
1, 1982 , the city of Tigard becomes eligible for the regular
Federal Flood Insurance Program. The following regulations
are adopted as required in 18 . 10 . 3 (d) of the National Flood
Insurance Program Regulations :
(1) A ' 0 ' foot floodway shall be adopted by the city
of Tigard for the purposes of implementing the Federal Flood
Insurance Program.
(2) The city recorders office shall be responsible to
obtain and maintain the following information:
(a) The actual elevation (in relation to mean sea
level) of the lowest habitable floor (including basement) of
all new or substantially improved structures , and whether or
C not the structure contains a basement;
292-5b (Tigard 8/82)
18 . 57 . 200
(b) For all new substantially improved flood-proofed
structures :
(1) Verify and record the actual elevation (in
relation to mean sea level) , and
(2) Maintain flood proofing certifications;
(c) Maintain for public inspection all records per-
taining to the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 82-04 51
(d) , 1982) .
18 . 57 . 200 Enforcement. (a) In addition to any other
remedies available to the city to enforce the provisions of
this chapter, the city shall have the right to proceed in the
manner set forth in subsections (b) through (e) of this section
with regard to any violation of Sections 18 . 57 .010 through
18 . 57 . 090 .
(b) The city shall give notice in writing by certified
or registered mail that it intends to correct the condition
resulting from the observed violation. The notice shall be
given to all record owners of the land upon which the violation
has occurred. The notice shall describe generally the nature
of the alleged violation, and shall inform those to whom the
notice is sent of the city' s intent to correct the condition
by restoring the land as nearly as possible to the condition
it was in prior to the violation , and to charge the owner or
owners with the cost. of any such action. The notice required
f by this section shall be valid and legally effective as to all
€. owners of any one tract when successfully delivered to any owner.
(c) At any time after the passage of ten days from receipt
of the notice the city may proceed to have performed such work
as it finds necessary to cure the effect of the violation.
The city shall keep account of work and materials used in
curing the effect of the violation. Upon completion of the
work the city shall compute the total cost of the work, in-
cluding labor and materials , and to this shall be added an
amount equal to fifteen percent of the total labor and materials
costs , to cover costs of engineering and other overhead. The
amount thus identified shall be entered on the city' s lien
docket, and shall immediately become a lien against the property
of the owner or owners , and shall bear interest at the rate at
which judgments of the Oregon courts bear interest. The owner
or owners shall be notified by certified or registered mail of
the entry of the lien.
(d) The lien described in subsection (c) of this section
shall be foreclosed in the same manner as that in which the
liens arising out of assessments for local improvement dis-
tricts are foreclosed.
(e) The ten-day-notice provision of subsection (c) of
this section notwithstanding, the city may proceed to cure the
condition caused by any violation of this chapter immediately,
292-5c (Tigard 8/82)
}
1
i
_ c
18 . 57 . 200
t
r
k
with or without notice , if the city council or the city adminis-
trator finds that the condition presents an immediate and
serious threat to human life or to developments located upon
property other than that upon which the violation has occurred.
If work toward the curing of the condition proceeds under this
subsection, that is , if an emergency is found -to exist, the r.
city may proceed to charge the cost to the owner or owners , a
and to place its lien against the property, as provided by
subsections (b) through (d) of this section, and the fact that
the city did not give ten days' notice shall not be a defense
against the charge or the lien. (Ord. 79-97 51, 1979) . z
3
i&
}
h
S
1 L
y
A
5
t
i
tr
Tr
2
�f
Ei{
t
(F/ t
292-5d (Tigard 8%82)
i
a
AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
PUBLIC WORKS I14PROVEMENTS
For the consideration hereinafter set forth, MARLIN DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC. , A
professional engineering firm, hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER, agrees to
provide engineering services to
THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
hereinafter referred to as the OWNER, for PLAi:NING SERVICES, FI14AL DESIGN SERVICES,
SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ON-SITE INSPECTION SERVICES and OTHER SERVICES for a
project generally described as:
S.W. 72nd Avenue Street Improvements
The generally intended scope of the project envisions improvements to S.W. 72nd
Avenue from S.W. Varnes Street on the north to the Tigard city limits on the
south, a distance of approximately two miles. The basic improvements proposed are:
A typical street section including a 44 foot paved surface with curbs (two travel
lanes) , left turn refuges where appropriate and traffic/pedestrian controls, bus
pullouts and walkways where appropriate and a landscaped median where appropriate;
Storm Drainage; Lighting; Railroad Crossing and Signals revisions as necessary;
undergrounding existing overhead utilities and such other miscellaneous improvements
as may be required to complete the basic project.
ARTICLE 1
it is the intent of this AGREEMENT that the ENGINEER will provide all the usual
services necessary to plan, design, construct and otherwise effect the full
completion of the project.
As the project is a Local Improvement District, certain procedures are required, some
of which should most properly be conducted by the City. Those functions include but
are not limited to the following:
1. Miscellaneous administration as necessary by city staff to implement
the project.
2. Assist with processing of resolutions as required in the L.I.D. process.
3. Assist with advertisement of notices as are required in the L.I.D. process.
4 . Coordinate with the conscltant (ENGINEER) in reviewing the scope of the
project, reviewing the pians and specifications, and providing miscellaneous
information and direction as deemed proper and necessary to assure the
continuity of the project.
5. Approve progress payments, change orders etc. , with due consideration to
Engineer's recommendation thereinregard.
C6. Assist with right-of-way acquisition, including condemnation if necessary,
after the ENGINEER has established and described the right-of-way to be
acquired.
t, 7. Award of the Construction Contract(s) after Ye-view and consideration of
the Engineer's Recommendation(s) of Award.
8. Conduct of all public meetings and hearings and the bid opening as required.
9. Assist in consultation with Washington County and the impacted Railroad
Companies and Utility Commissioner and other Agencies as necessary re-
garding right-of-way acquisition and other matters pertaining to the project.
10. Docket the assessment and otherwise carry out the usual Bancrofting process.
It is understood that the ENGINEER will provide applicable information to the City
to assist in the above functions and insure efficiency in carrying out these tasks.
ARTICLE 2.
The specific services which the ENGINEER agrees to furnish are as follows:
I. Collect all data and information necessary to reasonably identify the
project alternatives.
2. Prepare an ENGINEERS REPORT which will provide sufficient information
' about the scope and estimated costs of the project, su<_i. information and
cost estimates to be used in the conduct of the public hearing lead-
ing to formation of the Local Improvement District. The ENGINEER'S
REPORT will include, but not be limtied to the following:
a. A narrative discussing the general scope of the project and
alternatives to be considered.
b. The Preliminary Plan map illustrating the basic features of
the project.
c. The Ownership Report for each parcel proposed for assessment,
identifying the owner, the assessed valuation, outstanding
assessments (if any) , bonding capacity, proposed assessment,
bonding deficiency (if any) , and the area for use in calculation
of remonstrances.
d. The Preliminary Estimate of costs, to include estimated engineeri.r..g,
construction and right-of-way acquisition cost 'breakdowns.
e. The Preliminary Assessment map, to include parcel and right-
of-way delineation/identification.
f. The Notice of Public Hearing, and tentative project scheduling.
l
3. Some private ownerships will need special design consideration; Engineer
shall meet with them to determine such needs and shall incorporate
same in his final design.
(2)
111 L111
4 . Meet with appropriate CITY, COUNTY, RAILROAD COMPANY (and Utility
Commissioner) and UTILITY COMPANY(S) or other governmental officials
in discussing the project and arriving at an acceptable configuration
and design and, also, to develop and provide a tentative project
implementation schedule.
S. Attend Council, or other meetings as appropriate and make whatever
presentations are necessary, including preparation of maps, displays,
reports or materials as are appropriate in pursuing approval of the
project.
6. Provide a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION recommending City approval of the
construction contracts.
7. Prepare the ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION OF ASSESSMENT which will provide
all necessary information for use in conducting the final assessment
hearing, including but not limited to the following:
a. A narrative discussing the total project as it has been
constructed and the ENGINEERS recommendation of final
assessments.
b. The Final Report of all cost related to the project.
C. The Final Assessment Map.
d. The Final Assessment Roll.
mlmwswa_ffi��S
1. Prepare plans and specifications (bidding documents) for the improvements
as are customarily made available for construction of these types of
projects and based upon preliminary design approved by the OWNER;
Coordinate same with impacted utility and governmental agencies.
2. Prepare estimates of material quantities to be furnished and work to
be done, such estimates to be based upon prices which the ENGINEER,
exercising his experience and judgment in applying current cost data
deems to be appropriate at the time the plans are complete.
3. Process the documents with all appropriate regulatory agencies included
but not limited to the CITY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, the STATE OF OREGON,
RAILROAD COMMISSIONER, and UTILITY COMPANIES.
4. Provide general information in regard to the PROJECT and consult with
the OWNER or those designated by the OWNER to prepare necessary agree-
ments, such as those for rig:its-of-way easements and land purchase; and
provide a more precise and detailed construction schedule.
S. Furnish sufficient copies of plans, specifications and documents for
obtaining project approval.
(3)
/i.
' 6. Prepare and/or provide for a (construction) "traffic control plan"
for approval by other affected parties.
t
r,i"E4 �RZNG'�QNStRUC,`T3�N
I. Furnish sufficient copies of plans and specifications for obtaining
bids and for construction.
2. Provide for receiving and tabulating construction proposals;
analyze and report the results to the 0WNER; and recommend and
assist in awarding the contract(s) for construction.
3. Provide interpretations of the plans and specifications, and make
written evaluations/recommendations thereinregard.
4. Make periodic visits to the site of the PROJECT to observe the
progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is
proceeding in accordance with the intent of the Contract Documents,
and provide periodic written reports to the City thereinregard.
5. Coordinate the work of laboratories in the inspection and test of
materials used in the construction; receive and evaluate all reports
by such laboratories or bureaus.
6. Review shop drawings, diagrams, illustrations, catalog data, schedules
and samples, the results of tests and inspections, and other data
which the contractor is required to submit for conformance with the
design concept of the PROJECT and compliance with the information given
in the Contract Documents, and make written recommendations thereinregard
(to the City) .
7. Supervise the work of the on-site inspection personnel and other field
personnel.
8. Submit monthly progress payment recommendations (monthly estimates)
and prepare and submit contract change orders (along with a written
recommendation for action thereinregard) .
9. Make a final inspection of the construction jointly with representatives
of the CITY and subiait a final report (final estimate) upon which final
settlement and termination of the construction contract(s) can be based.
10. Attend meetings with the contractor involving construction and/or
progress payment disputes/conflicts.
D.s 'INSPECTION SEW=ES
1. Furnish the on-site inspection personnel to act as agent(s) of the 0WNER,
through the Engineer, in his relations with the construction contractor(s)
and affected utility company(s) ; to prepare monthly progress reports on
the work; to determine the amounts of payments due to contractor(s) as
set forth in the construction contract(s) ; and to keep all records, maps
and plans necessary for the preparation of drawings showing the project
as finally constructed.
(4)
ARM-
1. Furnish survey P equipment personnel and a ui ment required to obtain field infor-
mation
mation necessary to prepare satisfactory plans and specifications , ease-
ments, use permits and property rights-of-way descriptions and to provide
construction staking, coordinating same with needs of the contractor,
etc.
2. Furnish personnel and equipment required to perform subsurface ex-
plorations necessary for determining geologic foundation and/or con-
struction conditions.
3. Furnish legal descriptions of easements, rights-of-way and property
required for the PROJECT and provide personnel to assist the OWNER to
obtain easements, use permits, rights-of-way and property.
4 . Assist legal, financial or other consultants engaged for the project.
5. Submit one complete set of acceptable reproducible plans of the work
as it is finally constructed, to the CITi for record purposes.
6. Provide Administrative Services during construction which are outside
of the basic fee for FINAL DESIGN and SERVTCES DURTNG CONSTRUCTION such
as:
Meetings and negotiations involving claims and legal complaints.
Additional work resulting from delinquency or insolvency of the
contractor; or as a result of damage to the construction project
caused by fire, flood, earthquake or other acts of God, all exclusive
or additional work resulting from litigation.
Additional work resulting from strikes, walkouts, or other acts of
trade or labor unions.
7. Provide miscellaneous consulting and other services, associated with
the PROJECT, not stipulated elsewhere in this Agreement, when re-
quested by the OWNER.
ARTICLE 3.
As consideration for providing the services enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the OWNER shall
pay the ENGINEER;
v as enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the amount of the
ENGINE s ala y ,Costs, as de ined in ARTICLE 4, expended for the services multiplied
by a factor of 2.1 plus direct expenses in connection therewith.
B_ ME I
. I ' 11 i is NY wol as enumerated
in ARTICLE 2, the OWNER shall pay the ENGINE..K� a' '" j4`itiisii'aY1"tie aced upon the
schedule of suggested fees and procedures for applying percentage of construction
cost fees of the American Socienty of Civil Engineers, Manual No. 45, which is in
effect upon the date of notice to proceed.
(5)
j:
O � �
percentages for projects whose costs fall between the figures shown in
:manual No. 45 should be interpolated in the same number of significant figures.
It is agreed that a percentage charge obtained by averaging curves A and B
(attached hereto) shall be applied to each schedule or group of schedules which are
bsd In the same document and which are awarded to one general contractor under one contract.
Eighty percent (80%) of the above total fee shall apply to FINAL DESIGN SERVICES
and -the remainder shall be applied to SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
C. For-ON-SITZ INSPECTION SERVICES, as enumerated in ARTICLE 2, the amount of
the ENGINEER'S Salary Costs, as defined in ARTICLE 4, expended for the services,
multiplied by a factor of 2.1, plus direct expenses in connection therewith.
D. II s enumerated in ARTICLE 2, and for additional services
not specifics ly provide ereunder, the amount of the ENGINEER'S Salary Costs,
as defined in ARTICLE 4, expended for the services, multiplied by a factor of 2.1,
plus direct expenses in connection therewith.
x
ARTICLE 4. r;
z
It is further mutually agreed by the parties hereto:
a
A. That, the PROJECT is a Local Improvement District and that a decision whether
to form the district and proceed with Final Design and Construction will be made by the
^'ty Council after the usual public hearing. Accordingly, Engineering Services will be
rovided in two (2) phases; Phase I being those services required to take the PROJECT
'-hrough the Public Hearing on Formation of the District and Phase II being the final
:sign and construction phase after the district is formed. The ENGINEER will not begin
the final design phase until, and if, the district is successfully formed.
B. That, the OWNER shall make available to the ENGINEER all technical data
in the OWNER'S possession, including maps, surveys, borings, record drawings and
other information required by the ENGINEERS and relating to his work.
C. That, the ENGINEER'S estimated costs of construction shall be used as a
basis for monthly, partial or final payments of the ENGINEER'S fee until the actual
costs have been established by proposals or by contracts for construction.
D. That, the costs of construction used as a basis for computation of payment
means the total cost for the execution of the work, excluding fees or other cost
for engineering and legal services, the cost of land, rights-of-way, compensation for
damages to property, legal, and administrative expenses, but including the cost of all
construction contracts, items of construction, whether provided by private contractor(s)
or the OWNER; including labor, materials and equipment required for the completed work
(including extras) but without deduction for penalties, liquidated damages or other
k
amounts withheld from payments to the contractor(s) and including the total value at
site of the PROJECT of all labor, materials and equipment purchased or furnished directly
to the OWNER for the PROJECT fi
E. That, the cost of construction used as a basis for computation of the
C _4GINEER'S fee for a project which has not been constructed shall mean the lowest bona
S
fide bid received from a qualified bidder for ^ch PROJECT, or for a PROJECT for
Lich bids have not been received, shall meal, the ENGINEER'S last estimate of the
construction cost for the PROJECT.
:
(6)
f I
/�.
F. That, visits to the construction site and observations made by the ENGINEER
part of SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION shall not relieve the construction contractor(s)
of his obligation to conduct comprehensive inspections of the work sufficient to ensure
conformance with the intent of the Contract Documents, and shall not relieve the
construction contractor(s) of his full responsibility for all construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences and procedures necessary for coordinating and competing
all portions of the work under the construction contract(s) and for all safety pre-
cautions incidental thereto. Such visits by the ENGINEER are not to be construed as
part of the inspection duties of the on-site inspection personnel defined in other
parts of this Agreement.
G. That, on-site inspection personnel will make every reasonable effort to guard
the 0-vMER against defects and deficiencies in the PROJECT and to help determine if the
provisions of the Contract Documents are being fulfilled. Their day-to-day inspection
will not, however, cause the ENGINEER to be responsible for those duties and
responsibilities which belong to the construction contractor(s) and which include, but
are not limited to, full responsibility for the techniques and sequences of construction
and the safety precautions incidental thereto, and for performing the construction work s
in accordance with the Contract Documents.
H. That, the ENGINE'ER'S Salary Costs are defined as the amount of the wages
or salaries of the ENGINEER'S employees working on the PROJECT, plus thirty percent
(30%) of such wages and salaries to cover all taxes, payments and premiums measured
by or applicable to such wages or salaries, such as, but not limited to Worker's
'ompensation insurance, medical-hospital insurance, salary continuation insurance,
pension plan costs, and pro rata allowances for vacation, sick leave and holiday pay.
'ie ENGINEER'S Salary Costs are understood to be established by the ENGINEER'S Fee
-chedule for Professional Services currently in effect on the date of execution of this
Agreement, copy attached hereto.
I. That, the ENGINEER'S direct expenses are defined as the costs incurred on
or directly for the PROJECT, other than the Salary Costs (as defined hereinbefore) .
Direct expenses shall include mileage at $0.25 per mile when the ENGINEER'S own
automobiles are used. When technical or professional services have been furnished by
outside sources, as requested or approved by the OWNER, an additional five percent
(5%) of the cost of these services shall be added for the ENGINEER'S administrative and
continuing PROJECT responsibilities, conditional to his participation therein.
J. That, when the OWNER directs that competitive bids be taken for construction
on alternate design, where this involves the preparation of designs, plans and
specifications for alternate facilities, the compensation to the ENGINEER shall be
the payment specified in ARTICLE 3 for the FINAL DESIGN of the work to be constructed,
plus the alternate designs prepared for work not constructed, an additionalandt
to be negotiated at the time the OWNER directs that alternative designs, pans
specifications be prepared.
K. That, the OWNER shall pay for cost of personnel and equipment for test
borings, subsurface explorations, or other investigations required for the determination
of foundation and geologic conditions, except the ENGINEER shall not order such tests
investigations to be made without prior approval of the OWNER, Frank A. Currie ,
to have authority to give such approval.
(7)
AM
r
(_ L. That, in soils investigation work and in determining subsurface conditions
for the PROJECT, the characteristics may vary greatly between successive test points
and sample intervals. The ENGINEER will perform this work in accordance with generally
ncccpted soils--engineering practices and makes no other warranties, expressed or
implied, as to the professional advise provided under the terms of this Agreement.
M. That, payment to the ENGINEER as prescribed in ARTICLE 3, is to be made
within thirty (30) days after date of billing, in accordance with the ENGINEER'S
estimate of the value of work accomplished during the month. If amounts due are not
paid within the period specified, service and billing charges on the unpaid balance
will accrue at the rate of one and one-half (1�%) percent per month.
N. That, if any portion of the PROJECT covered by this Agreement and designed
or specified by the ENGINEER shall be suspended, abated, abandoned or terminated,
the OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER for the services rendered for such suspended, abated,
abandoned or terminated work, the payment to be based insofar as possible on the amounts
established in this Agreement or, where the Agreement cannot be applied, the payment
shall be based on the basis of the amounts for OTHER SERVICES, as prescribed in
ARTICLE 3.
0. That, the OWNER shall pay for all costs of publishing advertisements for
bids and for permits, licenses and fees that may be required by local, State or
Federal authorities and shall secure the necessary land, easements and rights-of-
way.
P. That, in the event of any action brought by either party against the other
to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning
the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the prevailing
party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs and expenses as may be set by the Court.
Q. That, in the event of any legal or other controversy requiring the services
of the.ENGINEERi in providing- expert .testimony in connection with the PROJECT, except
suits or claims by third parties against the OWNER arising out bf errors or. omissions
of the ENGINEER the OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER for services rendered in regard to
such legal or other controversy, including costs of preparation for the controversy,
on the basis of charges for OTHER SERVICES, as prescribed .in ARTICLE 3, in addition
to' other sums of money payable under this Agreement.
R. That, this Agreement is to be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto and is not to be assigned by either party without first obtaining
written consent of. the other.
ARTICLE 5.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in
duplicate this day of , 1980.
I OWNER
C
i
i by-
N,ARL�E & AT•S INC.
by
Mar De H as, President
(8)
J'
MARLIN DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES INC.
FEE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (HOURLY RATES)
JANUARY, 1980
Total Fee
(Per Multiplier)
POSITION 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3
Professional Engr. (Principal ) $32.60 $34.20 $35.86 $37.50
Design Draftsman (Project Engr.) 24.60 25.80 27.10 28.30
Inspector 17.60 18.50 19.40 20.20
Draftsman 16.40 17.20 18.00 18.90
Clerical 13.40 14. 10 14.70 15.40
Survey Manager 26.80 28.14 29.50 30.80
Party Chief 23.60 24.80 26.00 27. 10
Head Chain 15.00 15.75 16.50 17.30
Rear Chain 12.30 12.90 13.50 14.20
2-Man Crew 38.60 40.50 42.50 44.40
3-Man Crew 50.80 53.30 55.90 58.40
Computer Time No Charge
Electronic Distance
Measurement (EDM) No Charge
Mileage $0.20/mile
NOTE:
If work remains to be cone beyond December 31 , 1980, the balance of the fees
to be earned on each subsequent January First will be modified in accordance
with the Construction Cost Index of Engineering News Record, a McGraw Hill
Publication of nationwide circulation widely used in the construction industry
for this purpose. The Construction Cost Index used as a basis will be the
Index figure existing on January 1 , 1980.
DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
f CONSULTING ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS
SUITE 445-AGC CENTER WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070
9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE
(503) 682-2450
January 14, 1983
Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E .
Director of Public Works
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Frank:
Per your request, we have prepared a breakdown of our firm's engineering
fees billed to the City of Tigard related to the 72nd Avenue project.
All such billings have been in accordance with the AGREEMENT TO FURNISH
ENGINEERING SERVICES dated July 14, 1980.
For ease of detailed analysis and to enable recognition of specific areas
of fee costs , we have pulled subtotals from our cost-accounting records .
Following the breakdown, we have provided a brief narrative discussion of
various items as may be appropriate for better clarification.
1. Total fees as of January 1, 1983 $44,195.81
2. Subtotals - Specific Areas
a. Work related to reports, applications and
meetings with State Officials in pursuance
of grants for traffic signals or other traffic
safety related grants. $1,702.80
b. Work related to PUC applications . Meeting
with PUC and railroad officials and railroad
crossing protection design work (except survey
work which falls under Other Services) .
$2,835.33
c. Plan review on behalf of City of Tigard of new
construction work ("Permit Work" ) by other
agencies under permit from the City of Tigard.
�_. 1) City of Tualatin - 36" waterline
$1,055. 14
Ems
Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E .
City of Tigard
January 14, 1983
Page 2
2) Tigard Water District - 24" waterline in Bonita
Road, 12" waterline in 72nd from Bonita Road south,
8" waterline at Durham Road and Boones Ferry
and 8" waterline crossings for PacTrust.
$1,088.58
3) Metzger Water District - 12" waterline between
spur track and main crossing (never built) .
$ 183.92
4) General Telephone - Underground installation on
9666es Ferry from Carmen Drive south to Durham
Road, underground installation through new con-
nection of 72nd N.B. to Boones Ferry, underground
installation on 72nd from Fir to Landmark and
underground installation in Bonita Road.
S 722 . 14
SUBTOTAL 57,587.91
1. Total Fees as of January 1, 1983. $103,329.00
C. On Site. Inspection=-Services
1. Total Fees as of January 1, 1983. S 15,413.92
This includes related inspection of other new
construction work in 72nd Avenue by other
agencies under permit from the City of Tigard,
as listed in Item A_2.C. This also includes
inspection of realignment, replacement, exten-
sion, repair, removal or other modifications
to landscaping and existing utilities ; such as ,
telephone (General Telephone) , power (PGE) ,
lighting (PGE) , gas (NWNG) and etc.
1. Total Fees as of January 1, 1983. $145,396.93
2. Subtotals - Specific Areas.
a. Right-of-way and Easement acquisition .
t 551,350. 35
b. Historical Center Line Problems $ 2,006.85
c. Survey to tie all known monuments and corners
(requirement of ORS Chapter 209) $10,400.00
Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E.
i City of Tigard
January 14, 1983
Page 3
d. Design review and analysis to determine "Button-up
Costs plus Engineers Report for 32 ft. project
with curbs. $ 2,408.59
SUBTOTAL $66,165.79
E. Alternate Design (28' with ditch and shoulder)
$ 5,228.97
TOTAL $313,564.63
Following are narrative mments related to the above breakdown:
Subtraction of the total fees for work in specific areas, which
areas are in addition to services normally required ($7,587.91)
leaves a balance of $36,607.90.
Plan review fees and franchise fees collected by the City of
Tigard related to "Permit Work" are considerable and such fees
are understood to offset City costs . The consultant has been
used for plan review in this instance, in lieu of City staff.
The consultant' s fees for such work (Items C. 1 through C.4)
were cost-accounted and amount to $3,049. 78.
The remaining fees indicated above ($36,607.90) cover basically
the nyineers preliminary plans and reports, Ownership reports,
assessment maps , council meetings , hearings, other meetings and
presentations associated with formation of the district.
Recall that the 72nd Avenue project did not follow routine proce-
dures. Many extra hearings were held. The project required a
number of extra reports and required Council agenda action at
many meetings (normal procedures would not require more than
three meetings for complete formation of the district) . The
district went through a second formation procedure. A great
amount of re-advertisement was required. New assessment method
values were calculated and spread and Council held additional
hearings; not on one, but four assessment methods. Considerable
response and services were provided related to threats of litiga-
tion and outside engineer responses entertained by the counsel
(Blount, Ginther & Waker) .. Response and services were -required
related to the Contract Carriers (Sadoff) litigation.
The $36,607.90 figure is not surprising considering all the ser-
vices provided. Normally, one might expect it to be less than
one-half this amount.
Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E.
City of Tigard
January 14, 1983
Page 4
Additional planning services should be anticipated for work
related to the railroad crossing protection facilities and the
final reports and final assessments.
2. ,i - � ` i � rd� riees siTtn^n9tfi .
Fees for these services are based upon a percentage of the con- z
struction cost and their final determination is calculated at
such time as the final construction costs are known.
The final total is expected to run approximately $116,000.00,
approximately $13,000.00 of this amount remaining to be billed. a
3. ,Qn-Si-te Inspection Services.
Our cost accounting has not separated the costs of additional
inspection work performed on behalf of the City of Tigard related k
to new utility construction under permits issued by the City of .
Tigard. Construction value of such work is estimated at
$2,500,000.00.
}
Plan review fees and franchise fees collected by the City of Tigard
related to this "permit work" are considerable and such fees are F
understood to offset City costs. The consultant has been used for
inspection in this instance in lieu of City inspection.
Additional inspection fees will be required as the project is
completed. However, nearly all "permit work" utility inspection
is complete. In view of this review, it does not appear total
inspection fees are out-of-line. We will continue to provide no
more or no less inspection as is deemed necessary.
4.
Subtracting the total of fee, for work in specific areas , which
areas are in addition to services normally required ($66,165.79) ,
leaves a balance of $79,231. 14. The majority of this balance is
survey work. All the survey work for design is complete. Con-
struction staking remains for a little over one-half the project.
this project requires comprehensive field survey
The complexity of t s p � q 4
and staking work. A number of significant special items are as
follows :
i
C� Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E.
city of Tigard
January 14, 1983
Page 5
a. Precise cross-section work in order to develop grades would
save existing base and paving where possible, significantly
reducing construction costs.
b. Slope stakes have been required in many instances.
c. The project contains a myriad of exisiting utilities and, in
many cases, multiple lines (four water entities, for instance) .
d. Survey work has had to be conducted around and during extreme
traffic conditions.
e. New utility construction ("Permit Work" ) destroyed considerable <
work. The time frame that the project was forced into by
district formation delays, etc. made this unavoidable.
f. Redesign of portions of the project, as noted later in this s.
report, resulted in additional survey costs.
�H In view of the general nature of the project and after deducting
special items, the balance of Other Services costs do not seem out- }
of-line.
It is important to mention that the specific portion of the consultant' s
fee for Design and Services During Construction is based upon a percentage
of the construction cost and, therefore, this portion of the engineering
costs is closely fixed regardless of the many unanticipated complications
that have arisen. Such complications work to the disadvantage of the con- r
sultant.
Provisions for additional payment for redesign or alternate design work,
however, are specifically provided for in the Engineering Agreement. The
consultant has provided the following redesign or alternate design work z
in order to reduce overall project costs and prevent contractor delay and
litigation: .
1. Redesign th- 36" interceptor location in Durham Road because of
delay in acquisition of sufficient right-of-way.
2. Redesign the storm drain system around the ACS property because
of their refusal to give an Entry Permit or right-of-way.
3. Redesign of storm drain facilities at Carmen Drive to avoid the
Peterson property where right-of-way or Entry Permits were not
t available.
Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E.
City of Tigard
January 14, 1983
Page 6
4. Redesign of the northerly 400 feet of 72nd Avenue to
match State's realignment to save trees and right-of-way
costs.
5. Redesign of Boones Ferry, south of Durham Road, from 40 feet
to 46 feet, a special requirement criterion not provided to the
consultant until after completion of final design.
6. Redesign Durham Road from 40 feet to 60 feet, a special
requirement criterion not provided to the consultant until
after completion of final design.
7. Redesign of fill operations at Bonita Road to avoid closure
or unacceptable traffic problems caused by right-of-way problems,
contractor scheduling, utility problems (Power, Telephone and
T.W.D. ) , and the fact that September of 1982 experienced the
highest September rainfall on record.
In the spirit of good will and in the interest of cooperation, good working
relationships and expediency, the consultant has not and does not intend
to bill the City for these redesign services .
In summary, after careful evaluation of the research presented herein and
the many other factors affecting this project , we do not see any areas
where costs for engineering services are out-of-line and trust the City
of Tigard will acknowledge that we have, and are continuing, to keep both
engineering and construction costs at a minimum.
Respelly,
MARLIN J. DE HAAS, P.E.
MJD/slc
cc: 80. 194. 118
fAI)1tPF: -- -- -r- `- —
CiTY®F TIC�.� - -- - -
�11� - t
DATE OF REQUEST REQUESTED BY /! UNIT/DEPT.
-T-r---------
PURCHASE REQUEST -OR- CHECK REQUEST
SEND CONFIRMING P.O. IAV` CHECK TO BE MAILED WITH ATTACHMENTS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS 7—� NOTIFY REQUESTER WHEN CHECK IS READY
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER QUANTITY INVOICE NO. & DESCRIPTION ITOTAL PRICE
Z z r
!,OTAL REQUESTED = 14 } i4 _-
APPROPRIATION BALANCE $
Initials
P131ZOVAL :
SECTION MANAGER (Less than $100) .r
DEPARTMENT HEAD
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL —
i
------------------------------ ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ---------------------- -------
- )yn.it urr Chockrd
Amount Paid
('lwck Numbor i'tii . Itit .
----- --- - --- �i �•1iii., I t .. /t• ..Willi ttiq . . .t' ,�,� 1 . I ,•,•t 1.
Dat . 11.11d
Kv
Milli 111111
ti.
DE HAAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS
SUITE 445-A(:C CENTER WILSONVILLE. OREGON 97070
9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE (503) 682-2450
S T A T E M E N T
November 8, 1982
Mr. Frank A. Currie. P.E.
Director of Public Works
City of Tigard
12755 S.W. Ash Avenue
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Acct. No. 80. 194.118 - S.W. 72nd Avenue Street Improvements
Billing is in accordance with Agreement to Furnish Engineering
Services dated July 14, 1982
Services for October, 1982
Professional 94 hours @ $40.72 = $376.66
Draftsman 24 hours @. 20.48 = 46.08
Mileage 15 miles @ 0.25 = 3.75
Direct Expenses (Xerox, Prints & Other) = 0.75
$ 427.24
Est. (6.45%)($1 ,800,000.00)(80%) _ $92,880.00
(92,880.00) (100% Complete) = $92,880.00
Less Prior Billing (92,800.00)
$ 0.00
Est. (6.45%)($1,800,000.00)(20%) _ $23,220.00
($23,220.00)(35% Complete) _ $ 8,127.00
Less Prior Billing 6,966.00)
51,161.00
November 8, 1982
STATEMENT
City of Tigard
Page 2
Professional 33 hours @ $40.72 = $1,349.
76
Survey Manager 7.75 hours @ 33.50 259.63
Party Chief 114 hours @ 29.52 = 3,365.28
Head Chainman 110.5 hours @ 18.75 = 2,071.88
Rear Chainman 19.5 hours @ 15.35 = 299.33
Design Draftsman 38.75 hours @ 30.71 = 1,190.01
Draftsman 24.5 hours @ 20.48 = 501.76
7nsectv>r 134 hours @ 22.0"'_ = 2,950.68
Clerical 13.25 hours @ 16.78 = 222.34
Mileage 1,057 miles @ 0.25 = 264.25
Direct Expenses (Xerox, Printing & Other) = 117.23
$12,586. 15
TOTAL BALANCE DUE: $14,174.39
cc: Billing
Accounting
mad
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PU4q0`
FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: JANUARY 13 , 1983
SUBJECT: SPACE NEEDS II
The Civic Center Study Committee did two things : 1 . ) evaluated
reasonable City space needs requirements over the next 20 years ,
and 2. ) recommended a Civic Center proposal to meet those needs .
We are all aware of the defeat in June and again in September of
the Civic Center Bond Measures . The space needs none-the-less
remain to be resolved, or Space Needs II as we have called it.
Renting space as we need it becomes the logical course of action
at this point. Attached is a 20-year projection, optimistically
conservative to the low cost side, and costs could easily be 10%
higher over the entire analysis. This projection serves as a
"Baseline" on Space Needs costs. Anything we can do to meet or
beat those Baseline costs is then our goal .
It should be noted at this point that the $8 . 7 Million for
rentals over the next 20 years is enough to actually buy and make
bond payments to own our own facility.
I will continue working with the Mayor and Councilor Brian over
the next month or so to bring some specific alternative proposals
to Council for consideration. I hope to have us reach a decision
by June on a course.
RWJ : dkr
Attachments
i
TIGARD CIVIC CENTER - SPACE NEEDS
POLICE DEPARTMENT SQUARE FEET
*Police Officer 100
*Administrative Secretary 150
*'Community Service Officer 150
*Clerk/Dispatcher (4) 400
Chief's Office 200
Lieutenant's Office 200
Conference/Prisoner Lineup/Multi-Purpose 600
Crime Analysis 420
Detective's Office 300
Division Commander's Office 375
Equipment Storage 200
S.I. Room 400 0
Squad Room Male 650
Female 300
Shower Room Male 160
Female 80
Physical Fitness Room 500
Briefing Room 240
Patrol Division Commander's Office 200
Records Room 500
Supervisor's Office 150
Communications Center 300
Police Library 200
Report Writing Room 225 0
Records (Microfilm) 350
Supplies 430
Evidence/Property 430
{ Armory 200
Firearms Range 1,440 Recommended Not On Premises
Equipment Room 250
Holding Cells 480
Pri3oner Booking Room 180
Interview Rooms 300
Prisoner Dock 575 Exterior Space
Reception Area 380
*Conference Room 400
Circulation/Mechanical/Janitorial/Restrooms 1,241
TOTAL: 13,656
*Added to Department's estimate of need
O-Changed from Department's estimate
SQUARE FEET
LIBRARY 1,150
500
Reference 5,000
Quiet Area 1,000
Adult ReadinglStacks 1,000
Audio-Visual/Periodicals 2,000
Young Adult 500
Children's Library 800
Entry & Exhibit
Service Desk 1,400
Work Room 475
es/Small Conference Room 170
Librarians' Offic
Staff Room 500 O
Rest Rooms 200
Janitor's Space 500 1,500
Meeting Rooms (2) 200
City Archives 1,000
Dead Storage/Utility Room 18'$85
TOTPL=
}
CITY HALL
ExecCut—ive 300
City Administrator 200
Administrative Secretary 250
Administrative Aide/Assistant (2) 2,500
Council Chamber 250
�
*Jury Room 200
200
*Judge's Chambers 200
*Court Administration
*Attorney 200
*Secretary/Reception
Fin_nce 250
:' ane inDirector 200
Administrative Secretary 200
Accountant Sr- 0
2
Accountant 1 200
Billing Typist (2) 125
City Recorder 125
Administrative Secretary 80
clerk II s0
Clerk II 80
Clerk II (Bldg-) 80
Billing Typist 80
Vault 225
*Conference Room 300
Computer 300
*Reception
*Added to Department's
tmate of estimateneed
( O-Changed from partments
CITY HALL (Cont. )
Non-Departmental Square Feet
Cashier 150
Information Specialist 125
Computer Programmer 80
Data Entry Operator (2) 150
*Conference 300
*Copy Center 200 0
Reception 250
Mail Room 200
Planning, Building, Public Works
Planning Director 250
Assistant Planner 150
Clerk II ( .5) 100
Code Enforcement Officer 100
i
I Building Official 150
I Chief Plans Examiner 150
Building Inspector (2) 200
I Clerk II 100
Code Enforcement Officer 100
Public Works Director 150
Clerk iI 100
Clerk II 100
Engineering Superintendent 150
Engineering Tech. I (3) 300
Engineering Tech. 1.I (3) 300
Engineering Tech. III (1) 100
Conference Room 225
€' *Conference Room II 150
*Conference Alcoves (2) 100
*Vault 150
Drafting Area 300
Storage 600
*Paper Storage 100
*Reception 300
Urban Renewal Agency
*Staff (3) 450
*Secretary 150
Circulation/Mechanical/Janitorial./Restrooms 1,340
TOTAL: 14,745
GRAND TOTAL: 47,296
*Added to Department's estimate of need
O-Changed from Department's estimate
m �
0 0 o o ct2
cl
m •--� O M � r. .r N � �-. m O c M ". f E
a�H _
O O' O 0 0 0 p N ul O
N
O 0 0 SiO O
O O O O O M O m
• � � O '. � .� .r �. f. .-. Q N ^ m N � ri in t
E;z
vv ip i
w T V
O �
O OIO O OIO O � O O O V •� O O_ N O O O O 00 �
T O O O 0 0 0 O p N yNj W Om O O O a�
O Ai
O ari',f O G .-. r•. � r .-^ m .-r d) O
w w E
\
O� O O C O
m CCS n C�i �A Ni n w Q C:i I r. w 5
• W. t
W w \ d
� O
m � � N C• CrI w � .-. W M 6
w E
I w �
C
O p o O O O
6 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 00 0 ^ 00 0 O O O N C
0 0 0 O iA O O m 0 00 pO ON ti M O O O b i r
O O m a m m �� N . m a• N-�
• m aD rn � •--� •--• m � � u�'� N O
N O N
12
1 m Iw w C
N �
2 q
W O
O H O O O O 0 0 0 O O N O O H O O O O 0 0 0 O O H O n
�O O O rte'] O O � � � � O � D• � N N .. O O� V '_"� Vl K
• m m m �D O O N n N � � � .-y m ~ ~ � N+ n ON � � \ O
m u'�
f
p p O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O LL p
v: ti O �• O O b r• � O
. m E+ b O\ �r .r Cei ^• N v
O i
O
O O O O O O O m O O 0 0 0 >•
2 w
� v O
O O
N ^O O
O u'! ^ 0 0 Op N O O m L •q
C W N P..' � E+ �-� .-r U ♦p � O
U > O
w T O
i
q O
W O_ p tai
•--• O V H N w V ✓i W LL a' _ w w \ V1 W H y
°A aw.� ✓� W \ C
r MEMORANDUM v�
January 13 , 1983
TO : City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT : Vehicle Purchase Authorization
RE : Two Replacement Patrol Vehicles
Sir :
i had requested authorization to joint purchase replacement
vehicles with the City of Beaverton .
However, Beaverton has withdrawn their bids , and have elected
to purchase through the State of Oregon , as the State has
awarded bids for the Chevrolet Malibu . This is the same
vehicle that we have been purchasing over the past few years ,
is of good quality , and will not require an additional parts
stock.
The State bid is approximately $7 , 300 , which is $2 , 300 under
budget . Therefore , I wish to request authorization to joint
purchase within the State bid at this time .
Respectfully ,
R .B . Adams
Chief of Police
RBA :ac
COGtNC�L �_
-Z7 �d��
Date
{ AGENCY INFORMATION:
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
Purchasing Division
Department of General Services
1230 State Street
Salem, Oregon 97310
We request participation in the state purchasing program for public agencies
as provided for in ORS 190.240.
The following person(s) are designated as authorized agents for purchase
requests until further notice.
The name, title and facsimile of each individual 's signature is listed below,
which complies with the Department of General Services' Administrative Rules.
Sincerely,
*
AUTHORIZED AGENTS:
t
*
*
*
*
*Please type name and title below each signature.
81-125-3302 (Rev. 5-81 )
AA Z=l C t.:v-9 C t.;K FR E Q U E S Y
VENDOR
li•� ADDRESS D , �Q X 2--73
CIOF
O� oioz
DATE REQUESTED BY X-) UNIT/DEPT. �NQy- 1L,3 ,bbC>!i�
1 i
PURCHASE REQUEST CHECK REQUEST
PREPARE PURCHASE ORDER � CHECK TO BE MAILED WITH ATTACHMENTS
SEND CONFIRMING P.O. NOTIFY REQUESTER WHEN CHECK IS READY
SPECIAL IN`STR``U\\CTIONS CHECK NEEDED BY
ACCOUNT NUMBER QUANTITY INVOICE NO. & DESCRIPTION TOTAL PRICE
45–SZlOD – (,Z — -Lk
TOTAL REQUESTED Us -o-\
APPROPRIATION BALANCE /
Amount. / Init.ials
APPROVALS:
SECTION MANAGER (Less than $100)
DEPARTMENT HEAD
CITY ADMINIST'RATOR'S APPROVAL
t
----------------------------- C NTING PURPOSES ONLY
Amount Paid Signatures Checked
P.O. No.
Check Number Fin. Director
Date Paid
ACCOUNTING
I.-Lj e-c i:r-1 s-� C / `.r"y C V R rs c ay►6J c a
VENDOR
ADDftl:ti 'tCoZ� S .Wi V ,;-z7
CITYOFT167A RD
r
DATE: REQUESTED BY UNIT/DEPT. GV\a,�,
PURCHASE REQUEST CHECK REQUEST •
Q �.
C� PREPARE PURCHASE ORDER CHECK TO BE MAILED WITH ATTACHMENTS
SEND CONFIRMING P.O. NOTIFY REQUESTER WHEN CHECK IS READY
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS CHECK NEEDED BY
ACCOUNT NUMBER QUANTITY INVOICE NO. 6 DESCRIPTION TOTAL PRICE
t
- 7771L�
II.
TOTAL. REQUESTED Z q�-7� $a
t
APPROPRIATION BALANCE
Amount / Initials
APPROVALS:
SECTION MANAGER (Less than $100)
DEPARTMENT HEAD
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL
r
t
----------------------------- A C NTING PURPOSES ONLY ------------------------------ E
Amount Paid Signatures Checked
1
P.O. No.
Check Number Fin. Director
't
s
Da t.e Paid
ACCOUNTING
PURCHASE /CHECK FREl3UEST
VENDOR C��s M . Sc_� ,AkA}
ADDRESS
c1-1132—
CITY®F T16A
DATE REQUESTED BY UNIT/DEPT.14
�v.q`�r ��J. P W ePT•
i
EPURCHASE REQUEST CHECK REQUEST
PREPARE PURCHASE ORDER CHECK TO BE MAILED WITH ATTACHMENTS I'
-
ACCOUNT
SEND CONFIRMING P.O. NOTIFY REQUESTER WHEN CHECK IS READYSPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS CHECK NEEDED BY
NUMBER QUANTITY INVOICE NO. & DESCRIPTION TOTAL PRICE
t>, # Z
hr!�5-- 5Z o0 — V — C-%,5
3 54 L4(a�Z
�. cam. et(••. is
TOTAL REQUESTEDM+ (04(0,3z
APPROPRIATION BALANCE $ /
Amount / Initials
APPROVALS:
SECTION MANAGER (Less t n $100)
DEPARTMENT HEAD j
CITY ADMINISTRATOR' APPROVAL
---------------------------- ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ------------------------------
Amount. Paid Signatures Checked
P.O. No.
Check Number Fin. Director
Date Paid
�-�
l�D ADDRESS
0111(OF T16A RD
DATE OF REQUEST2 a 2 REQUESTED BY UNIT/DEPT.
PURCHASE REQUEST -OR- CHECK REQUEST
SEND CONFIRMING P.O. ® CHECK TO BE MAILED WITATTACHMENTS
Q SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS NOTIFY REQUESTER WHEN CHECK IS
READY
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
ACCOUNT NUMBER QUANTITY INVOICE NO. & DESCRIPTION rOTAL PRICE
C �S
TOTAL REQUESTED
PPROPRIATION BALANCE $
Initials
APPROVAL :
SECTION MANAGER (Less than $100)
DEPARTMENT HEAD
1
ITY ADMINISTRATOR'S APPROVAL
COUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ------------------------------
1 Signatures Checked
Amount Paid L-�J`(y
Check Number L - 0 r Fin. Dir.
Accounting.
t. Dept.. Fibs
Original to
Dat P Pai8 �.
Re: Tigardville Heights
{ L.I.D. #29
T/L 301
STREET DEDICATION Deed Book 732, Page 319
Frazer
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That
Kenneth E. and Diana M. Frazer, husband and wife
hereinafter called grantor(s), for the sum of $ 723.75 constituting the
actual consideration for this deed, do hereby give, grant and dedicate to the Public
a perpetual right—of—way and easement for street, road and utility purposes on, over,
across, under, along and within the following described real premises in Washington
County, Oregon: A strip of land in the northwest 1/4 of Section 11 T-2S. R-1W. W.M.
Washington County, Oregon being more particularly described as follows:
The east 5.00 feet of that tract described in Deed Book 732, Page 319
Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon.
Containing 482.50 sq. ft.
To have and to Hold the above described and dedicated rights unto the Public
for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated.
The grantor(s) hereby covenant.; that he (they) are the owner(s) in fee simple
and have a good and legal right to grant his (their) rights above described.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the un ersigned pers (s) has (have) hereunto set his (their)
hand(s) and seal(s) this 1;2aay of L 197L4r
l
(Seal) eal)
(Seal) )
(Seal) (Seal)
k
T
i�
t
i
:\ C
W =
= x
Ql W
W N
J O
?CM F -
t cr-, U
.-� • W
o
'n
,o, o
It
o
QA
� VM _ I
L6
N
V
n�j M nl
h
h
o
w 0 �
o o v
w
c � x
O O p U
w •.I y
C 1 W
T 4 r
N ~
v o >
N C •o T N OW W
G — a
o
L y U C y F 6 r
v n y fA W a c'4
w ° w O
% V y S ¢ _
O
W U p N b C Z
N v o A A
L vyi z uFI Y4 L 3 ro ¢ ¢ ax
o O w H V] ro W 9-O
u > > ca a ro
71-1 x
0 m ro w a z aH ¢cwi�
w 43
O w C N O O L
H ro o In o v •, a D' 1 V1 W
T aTi r+ 1-i E 'O W 3 m ,-r >+ Zp to a
o
> > ¢ a ¢ ° ¢ ° E v o ° z x z x o xo
E n m O
E 3 W m �1+ a) o u L ¢
ro
D ° z i a z M
Y &., q y u A U w 7 > V >'•'a C..C+ U 6 U 'G V7 C
r O N vy D4
'� H F N F U U CWn w cui N d•,-, u A
co L
Z a �"' � '� N cp s4
u G..D O
N O O 7 w
C Ul N •.� 7 U W H W
y C U O
oj Co
cc L4 m 0 114
~ Z ¢l I L .C+ H a C Z H N w
coa T •--� L m u C A > O M
a O a W O H w ° C N u W 7 x 0 a a
W F y N x F •.� G'. L4 u w H T ••a 3 0. C a� U R. W x O
C ca
W O m u W N A WrS+ ro 3 U N N •C N aTi.� N e-1 U O P.
w b 'o•m L ••+ N Cl F W H
x 3 .� I,aj y 7 >+ >. 7 3 •� N N O N O N y U 7 W. a A >•
p+ O'6 w o S 3 Q' w ad 'd O C C. y N o O W N N U S ¢ P. X H
C P. Z Z OD W' G' 14 W -Vi •o to N u 7.+ L14 O N L+ H OO F W U U
T W C W W xi M O i+ C G O 7 7 oC U W O
y H H O O 'D U 4! O o
,•+ O W Z '~ a s y X .Y N E N L O L L C 3 F a F x
U W 3 3 U w =w ,., T v E oo
W ro o m u > •.� N w W Cl
S P+ L C••+ O o0 N C O O F >+ O a
7 y O F O H H p U L WU S4 G C M y O x
bo•.+ d O 0. l+ I4 v W U r O W x
C w 0Op •.+ N T E — G % Ol N O
N > F O N W w w U C V A . ro •d N a u L ..VDD C .Z U
•.a y a d L S S N C y u O W
c bo G G C C C v U S S cx
3 N d a N A W y•N O O O•I ro ro E W S F W V]
S!•.+� N 6 W W N > G y y N N V GO 3 a o 0(�A
(!1 l+ d N Gl N N t L 41 L t
W e-y m 6 S C x w N V U U 01 V 00 00 V y +-� 1"'•.+ N W U O
O p N G C C H C..� •.� C O 'a C W F U
VI •.+ Hro x 0 o >4y ro ro C', u m.--� .•+ ro C ..C+ C ro O w W V W
41 L N y N N
p0, CO T S A N >• w•.C+ u +� ccw V..+ N
d al F a m A ro ro u u cu u y d
Z Y x ro w a p• v C w Nco C C G O••+ ro W >4 m
off .aa c `�� v > o s. . •�., ~ •� tia � ...+ •. v ., v > x
6 0 N m co ra ca y m y +-c ro co 0 o
6 0 0 O o
F 6 0 S N P.. 5 3 6 V ;E: S u3 Ln x U N W x A H W F
y
cx,
W
f x N
xl oo
r-I dNIplIWI HI
�+ 00It+1IHl TI
ZI ���I �Itil d U'1 d p
t`^� o
O�O TILT n O� Vl� n � �rnO NI ✓1I%O t+1 f �O �7 tCOI
y u •.+ m
C
O 0.
G. n•
'J rn U v
N y
^J S+ n•�.. ro O
t ro C7 �4
a) O •.a O
L a1 m
L T 3 C
v '
ro ro on v
,z oD U u)
y L C Z rW-i
O P y q C
o
0. aJ e-+
C) C Z L Y
U U
O 4 W 4 U
Q) 42
3 Z ]
R. E
x c ro '.xi
co
L x .
a 'U ro _
E o H ro a
.Qj N-+Z Y �
c y Y a1 ,7 HC x
d Y+ 51 0 ti H ti a C4
,.Ti C. j ro U CG d W
�--� 00 ..d n q O w S
a W r
C m J V y Z O Y Z
d v3
T
z a c ro w r -a'
d
O3 •.+ Q• a.� a O W O H
H cl
6 6 W ; C a to w nr H
O C
a o a o a v a¢ d
w w u w
W `" O N O aTr
;2:
y,, w H O O U
x H .a a! U
RO'E .0 z: Z W W
. ro u 7 7•. O x H H
O
E•'�,.c y m r z 0 O O
O ai N p. •-p
U Tw W ar O Z6 66
H H
w w N Z •d H?. 6. W
O
O C U a • VI V] V1
qw Q)-> ffl m W
ro
a •ti n a .� a
cn
n >•+ s ro mo 00
H - O U v] �+ w v] 3 3
N V
W U
f s.
O 3
C
ro
M C14
I{ I iI Sa
'C
ro
ZI �I �INIOIoOI •o
v
En