The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 12/13/1982 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign their name on the DECEMBER 13,11982, 7:30 P.M. appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL provided, ask to be recognized by the Chair. LECTURE ROOM 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff, Council ` Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda 2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 2.1 Approve and Authorize Appropriate gignatures • Greenway Dedication - General Telephone 8838 SW Burnham Street • Street Dedication - 9495 SW Sattler Street • Non-Remonstrance Agreement - 9495 SW Sattler Street • QuitClaim Deed - 9485 SW Sattler Street • Agreement for Easement - 9485 SW Sattler Street • Non-Remonstrance Agreement - Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 2.2 Approve JB Bishop/Pietros Easement 2.3 Receive and File Communications: • TCYS Monthly Report • Bus Stop Deli Report From Planning & Development • Monthly Financial Report For October, 1982 ® MACC/Cable TV Update (; © Tigard Christian Church Communication Re: Xmas Lights 2.4 Approve Expenditures and Investments: $ 287,245.28 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT • Building Official 4. WATER COMMITTEE REPORT a Councilor Stimler 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARINGS - All public hearings follow the same procedures and are govered by TMC 18-84 • Public Hearing Opened o Summation and Planning Commission Recommendation, Director of Planning and Development ® Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination • Public Hearing Closed i • Consideration/Action by Council ° 5.1 CPA 6-82 Energy 5.2 CPA 7-82 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 5.3 CPA 8-82 Economy 5.4 Approve Calendar for Comprehensive Plan Public Hearings and Cancel Meeting of 12/14/82 6. URBAN RENEWAL POLL - Receive Results • Report by City Recorder 7. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 8. ADJOURNMENT J� • J T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 13, 1982 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian, John Cook, Nancie Stimler (arriving at 7:36 P.M. ), and Kenneth Scheckla (arriving at 7:35 P.M. ); Director of Public Works, Frank Currie (left at 8:38 P.M. ) ; Finance Director/City Recorder, Doris Hartig; City Administrator, Bob Jean; Director of Planning & Development, William Monahan; Legal Counsel, Ed Sullivan; Office Manager, Loreen Wilson. 2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL & AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) City Administrator requested that the following items be added to open agenda: .1 TU APPLICATION BY KIWANIS - REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER 3. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATE SIGNATURES o Greenway Dedication - General Telephone, 8838 SW Burnham Street o Street Dedication - 9495 SW Sattler Street o Non-Remonstrance Agreement- - 9495 SW Sattler Street o QuitClaim Deed - 9485 SW Sattler Street o Agreement for Easement - 9485 SW Sattler Street o Non-Remonstrance Agreement - Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve and authorize appropriate signatures. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 4. RECEIVE AND FILE COMMUNICATIONS: o TCYS Monthly Report o Bus Stop Deli Report from Planning & Development o Monthly Financial Report for October, 1982 o MACC/Cable TV Update o Tigard Christian Church Communications Re: Xmas Lights o Police Comprehensive Report (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve with the addition of the Police Comprehensive Report. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 5. APPROVE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $ 287,245.28 (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve. { Appreved by unanimous vote of Council present. COUNCILOR SCHECKLA ARRIVED: 7:35 P.M. PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 13, 1982 6. EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTION (a) Director of public Works introduced Jerry McNurlin as the new Public Works Superintendent. COUNCILOR STIMLER ARRIVED: 7:36 P.M. 7. CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT Ins ector/Codes Ed Walden, and Building p code (a) Building Official, ave overview of the Officer, Brad Roast, g being Enforcement what difficulties were g 5 enforcement duties and stated Code.policies sign inventory is in enforcing the new Sign were discussed experienced being completed and departmental enforcement at great length. 8. WATER COMMITTEE REPORT (a) ee's work Councilor Stimler advised Council Of tee the waiting ufor dy Cothe t CH2M Hill . to date noting that the Co report before any recommendations can be made by the Committee encouraged the City Council to (b) grace Clark, Committee Chairman, on December 14th where s attend the Water District Board Meeting,He stated a final report CH2M Hill will be filing their report. R should be ready for Council in 3 or 4 weeks. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 'LEFT: 8:38 P.M. 9• COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARING - CPA 6-82 Energy Q (a) public Hearing Opened Director of Planning & Development introduced the development plan. Council to the (b) process in the community process for developing comprehensive Legal Counsel spoke regarding the legal elements of the comp (c) Leg procedure for Council- (d) adoption and set out the Director of Planning & Development advised Council •that Planning (d) roved the Energy Element as presented Commission has app Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3 Member, requested the (e) Public Testimony: #3 be changed to read as follows recreational, Implementation Strategy pal to Locational criteria for residential lhallII address the g and public facility land uses Svehicular travel in order to conserve minimize necessary energy. (f) Public Hearing Closed Implementation Strategy �k3 be changed to read Bishop suggested Imp lan ua a to the end of the (g) Mayor as follows (by adding the following g g sentence): and state "specifically with convenient access to federal d major collector streets". highways, arterials an PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 132 1982 (h) Discussion followed between Council and staff regarding the implementation strategies. (i) ORDINANCE NO. 82-78 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ENERGY ELEMENT OF THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (j) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. (k) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to amend the word 'will' to the word 'shall' in the implementation strategies. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (1) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to amend implementation strategy #3 to read as follows: The City shall locate higher densities and intensities of land use in proximity to existing and potential transit routes, specifically with convenient access to federal and state highways, arterials and major collector streets. z Motion approved by a majority 3-2 vote of Council. Councilor Scheckla and Stimler voting nay. (m) Motion to adopt as amended was approved by a majority 3-2 vote of Council. Councilor Scheckla and Stimler voting nay. Ordinance No. 82-78 will require a second reading on December 15, 1982 10. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARING - CPA 7-82/Air, Water and Land Resources Quality F. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Public Testimony: o Geraldine L. Ball, 11515 SW 91st, expressed concern regarding dumping of water and foreign waste on her property. City Administrator stated staff would investigate and report back to her. r 7 o Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3, discussed the NPO's concerns with t policies 4.1 and 4.2 especially concerning septic tanks. i . o Mrs. Gloria Johnson, local citizen, expressed concern regarding wood burning stoves and their impact on the air quality. c (c) Public Hearing Closed (d) ORDINANCE NO. 82-79 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE AIR, WATER ' AND LAND RESOURCE QUALITY ELEMENT OF j THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 13, 1982 (e) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. (f) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to amend the word 'will' to the word 'shall' in the implementation strategies. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to direct staff to correct any typographical errors found in the document. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (h) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to amend implementation strategy #5 on page 27 to read as follows: The City shall continue to use local recycling services and shall encourage and cooperate with all recycling agencies which conform to all state and federal environmental quality standards. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (i) Motion to approve, as amended, was passed by unanimous vote of Council (j) Consensus of Council was to direct Legal Counsel to redraft the DEQ/208 plan criteria and bring back for Council review in January or February. RECESS: 10:28 P.M. RECONVENE: 10:45 P.M. 11. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARING - CPA 8-82 - Economy (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Public Testimony: o Geraldine L. Ball, 11515 SW 91st Avenue, questioned the buildable land map accuracy and bonding methods used by City. o JB Bishop, Developer, encouraged the use of bancrofting to help the industrial/commercial land development. o Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3, expressed concern with the statement in the plan that the City requires all new development be connected to a sanitary sewer system. He supported septic tanks in some areas. (c) Public Hearing Closed C" (d) ORDINANCE NO. 82-80 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ECONOMY ELEMENT OF THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 13, 1982 (e) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to adopt. (f) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to amend the word 'will' to the word 'shall' in the implementation strategies ; correct typographical errors ; add on Page 19 the following items for the representatives for the economic development steering committee: 17. Retail Merchant and 18. Commercial/Private Property Owner. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (g) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to amend the map on page 13 to show the adopted plan by the steering committee and the implementation strategies on page 18 by adding strategy No. 20 to read as follows: "The City Council, upon the recommendation of its Economic Development Committee, shall develop objectives, criteria and standards for determining the availability of bonding methods and use of bond proceeds for private commercial and industrial development." Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (h) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Cook to change 5.1.6 policy, fourth word, from 'support' to 'consider' . Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (i) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to reword implementation strategy # 18 as follows: "The City shall encourage private landowners to consider utilizing available bonding methods, in addition to private financing methods, to provide public facilities to vacant buildable lands with the potential for industrial or commercial development."; Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (j) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 82-80 as amended was approved by unanimous vote of Council. (k) Mayor Bishop expressed his appreciation to staff for their time and effort on the elements heard. 12. APPROVE CALENDAR FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC HEARINGS AND CANCEL MEETING OF 12/14/82. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to accept calendar and approve cancellation of December 14, 1982 Council meeting (see attached calendar). Approved by unanimous vote of Council. C13. URBAN RENEWAL POLL - Receive tsu_cs (a) Mayor Bishop accepted the initial report from staff. City Administrator stated the official tally would be available on December 17, 1982 and staff would report back on 12/20/82. PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 13, 1982 4. 14. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under 1.3 were discussed at this time. All persons were encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 14.1 TU APPLICATION BY KIWANIS - REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER City Administrator requested Council waive the fee for christmas tree sales by the Kiwanis since they were a service organization. 1 Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Brian to waive fee s Approved by unanimous vote of Council. _ r 15. ADJOURNMENT: 11:55 P.M. 4 k 617 4 City Recorder, City of- and F i F f ATTEST: f t Y. Mayor - City of Tigard 6 4 {f 6 F i R i i { f S d t PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 13, 1982 i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, I ss. s, __. John---W._.Marling. - -._......- being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the publisher ---Qf._._the____._ Tigard__---- Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined Tigard by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at s, in the aforesaid county and state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for .-.-..._..one------- successive and consecutive weeks in the following 1g82------_---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- - 4 ------- ---------_ __- ------------------.___.. ( ignature) Subscribed-and sworn to before me --._9th----------_------- day of _.......... ....December----- ---- is82 ----- - - -------------------------------------- --------------- Notary Public of Oregon My commission expires ___Fe}21ti_Lt&r_y-----2-4--.------- 19._8.6 The folla� =�ecEmtaer 13, 1A,Snttligler 3util Sigh Schaoi 17ax;ii0. ti1�n>ftrt>atm l3ejre;ooirkeht id 12MOW AShAVen re, rQ mr�c►sa.: tsr;by a�itis�g A .onsprehea:�sre P3at�epnr�EtRei�r , A 7.83 fc►mrehenSWe P�pn {3 a asr and Land 3t�ourrea Qualify SFA&83 Comgrehefid R A iitaa A +ti `d3� fuiisB >� g�axx ,CPA Y24 Gu�tpr lve Pisa Re�earE�rtafina SPA I3 1pr��rehe�lsive � HopBfs�g A 3 ve C+ at urT tea .xc,�` G� �.�Vul[1Fs�aiau�hF 7CR1W�+�nusi.YL 7+WG � � r ��yf f < M +a * ts DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 0 CLQ, o.rP Tt� Catuic'a P it h f uIL��La Ilea Foa�xe�z ��uu.arz IGinh S.clzao. r7.e.ae -O eia 13, T 98? )h r, >?)a >1 o s a i d ')-,� e�,-., C e r.1 c S T.� ti C'L; L: c- NV narze t s`'Geftaccltrzg L. /3a,f' and 3 owl n.eyvr en� DA, 3rze,, anci flUL e.2r �. :rtr�� and .7 an, Zea d inr c t/,&3 .so you rna�A have a rwpL� and care a.r.6o me, J .ajzerzlz .uz near.�zd ,to: CPA S-i-z, 191-1 - Car,m e- i ,-- .can r�--01 c JTfl9 JV - i cnaaa A rwAa-f d - Faanorrut - Un las AJOlY ST U'S &a ani gr-69-d raaa onz ;°oz,�iru an Fcorwrzin Steen u� Carmu..t eal .to C-'644 6.t -in ,t Ize ,jwerzt lv eand " 3 was zn-.a.-ad ��r ,,aur- altar-,e on !7,--c",� 70, 7982 .tho-t Tl-gcuul dam natt ar ea ern haua sc-crz a -Pr mid .i hczt .i 6 r.✓ha the N" oP- 23ui e Cam ezar'czt and 3ndt&6t zilz2 Xvjut.6a&r .t o P.2anr o Camnu-3 -i-an con 9, 1932 and eaaa .tachy amore not a : 3.6 .the map .in c.f� -Zr- the Economia daclunarzt ZeJ'—L e 6�au -tan.i�ht zrze orze tlza t rpt i,'-- zubu-tterl 4-a o's "L th -the Ccanoruj Co .e %can Rel "T;zen .ice Jlz zu =rued .ta LCD 3.tem 5.7.6 - Ccaaafluci �i u� 3� a c, ,J,.-G.t, kl•„” j Dmw tt-Lz mean a detfef-afzelz =a --am cut L D and cut Banznot, t .PandLw- aLthou.t a ttiru.s aT�zcerL%cz of a�.fLaua,e o� otQ, T0-vpcu�rz .in .tlze an-ea o�z u.Lthat�t natL,,%wzg aAtha oz01M f2A-a1W-17-5j -Za the aQvde luzoxLnLty-1 � not, &riza t dace -, t nzean? /'.2ea a.e .iwd e .th is and a j f crnuclenz pa,-t o%' ,thy c o,� Tt farad Counai.L a ?mac / afun� on Ecanaruj- { r INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. o (503) 639-2900 Ci,tll x7y T-i.n cvzd C•aurLci_E Fa"le-,L ytuL z. !Ljah SchaoJl aecem&eia 13, 1952 �1 i _ � vk e m G�e c J :,c- Co � nc iL r`1 r ruzrrae `(ZZ G Hca 2d L• �' ° ' and 3 c.a .L-�erLf Jn c. cuui mea e L� on cz� � and S ani n eadi,z� t1 Li.3 ao ,fau LJ have- a zoplz F and Liz czP�o wL� fu*�e a car^L,L. Pq 7-8i(�'�'�F1iu!SJV Lc�` Rb'ORT JT Flt 4.4. 1 Unde2 %aU-c a .i t .a-tate-6 ,•The C�tl� ,czi rLtcaile afuaPx r, and it yuLou�, th cL rz t cu�cLF�-- o-I- P.u�nluf'e Land r2eaouA4e,6" 3 ) Unde L JnyaCe"zera "n i.t z tn.tea „The C%t�L Lu-tZ enaua-e tha-t A..tcuc e terLd and f � CIJ�I��T zCcOc n-_arun .to dLC St_a-tz ancl FlaC Y- '6'to zrLs•„ toed t),,-t mean uau da riot .i-ar .tJte dtb 2224 ru?- at'- c mten fJuz t .can ta.i a f- &-merit .aures cz�s La fzcrr��,erwza on Dula f2/L a�ze,7-&j at .the fvLezp-Lt .t-m - t}cn�L tlza t ori w.e have rut aim. U.e wvw to .ta Fn a Cutiai� .i-a n erg vv-4 to ,t)u-6 on fdr L,,e,d.e1L 29, 1932 .scat as fa/L w.e hlUle act had a Axy;-,&1, Coyz� a� 2ett�a to Fnczrzfa Cu�rlai e �a a.tte.clz� and -t/z z U.e "h that . hiz,ll et t e s .ta Flwnh Cua4.?e, and a 2f anzw.eraa .fie ruzd e- fzatit o� .th a, CLtr t o.A T.uzand CauncLe pae,&_c f-LeaAz as on Ai/z, Uatc L, and Land h aaouA,a 0ua-U. l i r r DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 639-2900 0 I:1s1J�:L 290 7902 i.n.� fnr..r z �cnlri_e Cwt•• a;? TL:� 23397 12755 T.Z- �zr� C.:c: � 97223 Lat y"��J �';c� 2 .i 1 1 _ . :s rt:x L:t 1%OJ, �2 2 s 1 1 T,1v a yrs -' at hn.cr r �,:� t�:� �-i_:_�: .��: T.i�-�..c! zcnw Za v Cs je n_ w S.ccitctt�r Tr.�s=.a. U3:t r f t N n� i and Cluistialf C lire s yi7 13405 S.W.Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 phone 639-5773 Rob Blakely,Minister CI .hleJAs%cI' P ister f 7 December 1982 i i Dear Bob: ' E i I have not hesitated to pass brickbats your way and I know that you and the city deserve many more compliments that you receive. You and the r city deserve a word of thanks for your part in the lighting of the ` Christmas tree in the Payless/Albertson shopping center. I realize that the city was not obligated in any way to help with this project but I also know that without the help of Frank Currie and the coopera- tion of different people from the city, the lighting of the tree would likely not have taken place on schedule. One of the great needs in this community is for the healing of hard feelings and a sense that city hall is working for and with the good of the community at heart. Since you have taken over as city administrator Bob, I think these things are being realized and the help of the city on this one little project contributes to the community spirit. Keep up the good work. Thanks again, I b PROJECT NtU-IE: FILE REFERENCE A? ESS: TAX MAP: TAX LOT: GRF.ENWAY DEDICATION KNOW AI.L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, TILAT GE14ERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST. INC. a Washington Corporation duly qualified to do business in the State of Oregon hereinafter called grantor(s) , for the sum of $1.00 constituting the actual consideration for this deed, do hereby give, grant and dedicate to the Public, its successors for Greenway purposes the following described real premises in Washington County, Oregon: SEE ATrAC''ED EXHIBIT "A" dated October 11, 1982 To Have and to Hold the above described and dedicated rights unto the Public for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that he (they) are the owner(s) in fee simple and have a good and legal right to grant his (their) rights above described. IT'S 10E PRES"IDENj Cf -ORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT )NAS{ /NG To n/ SE TAR AND EASURE STATF. OF- ) SS. County. of SMIA104�7isAy } (5n this / day of LP-ct� 19,,� before me appeared ,and both to me personally known, who being duly sworn, did say that he, the said i ` / is th%President, and he, the said P is the Secretary of GENERAL TR P2I,Pi I: rn CE TIE M", TATO the within name Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed j n behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and and - acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Co oration. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Pu c for �i�/f�i✓G My Commi ion Expires / 9g.3 ACCEPTANCE (� I Approved as to legal description this day of 19 O<9- o� r L BY: City Engineer - City of Tigard � 1 Approved as to form this "l day ofP2"�A_4' 171 19 BY: Cit At orne - it f T gard �0 19 L -Approved this 2- —"day of �o�! tti''�- BY. �'�-- airperso -I City of Tigard, Oregon Planning Commission Accepted by the City Council this day of 19 BY: City Recorder - City of Tigard STATE OF OREGON )SS. County of ) O1. _his day of 19_, before me appeared �: both to me personally known who, being duly sworn, did ' t say that he, the said is the Mayor, and he, the said is the Recorder of the CITY OF TIGARD, a z_:._-ticipal Corporation, and the said and acknowledged the- said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, this the day and year in this my certificate first written. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires C October 11 , 1982 That certain tract of land in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Base and Meridian, in Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the point in the centerline of County Road No. 997 and in the westerly line of the WW Graham Donation Land Claim No. 39, said recorded subdivision in said county; running thence South 44°44 ' West along the westerly line of said Graham Claim 799.4 feet to the true point of beginning: THENCE, continuing South 44044' West along the west line of said Graham Claim, a distance of 169.00 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE, South 63015' East a distance of 481.90 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE, South 57007' East a distance of 30.9 feet to an iron pipe 1" in diameter; THENCE, North 34024' East a distance of 138.00 feet along the south- easterly line of that tract of land conveyed in Volume 672 Page 400 Washington County Deed Records; THENCE, South 71026131" West a distance of 96.47 feet; THENCE, North 63015' West a distance of 360.00 feet; THENCE, North 02016' West a distance of 110.00 feet to the true , point of beginning. .•.�! Tr-•icrE�tionc� Com�::s�.v Northwest. i;}c. October 21, 1982 Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E. Public Works Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Currie: TIGARD CENTRAL OFFICE AND SUPPORT CENTER - PARCEL #54601-02 DEDICATION OF LAND Enclosed is a fully executed Greenway Dedication Deed for the portion of our property at 8838 S.W. Burnham Road in Tigard, Oregon. After recordation, please send a copy of this document, for completion of our legal files, to Mollie E. Bjelke, General Telephone Company of the Northwest, Inc., P.O. Box 1003 (2-LB), Everett, Washington 98206. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Mollie at (206)258-0314 in Everett, Washington. Very truly yours, r i C� Dan Griffin Supervising Engineer Land and Buildings Enclosure 4 f { i r C, 1 PK)JECT NAZME: FILE #: Ai DUESS• ` 9495 SW Sattler, Tigard, OR TAX MAP: 2S 1 11AC TAX LOT: 3200 CONSENT COVENANT (NON-REMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT) Street Improvements The undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby r----)rd their consent to the formation of a local improvement district by the City of Tigard fc the purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property abuts. The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to oppose or remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the abutting street or streets, reserving only the right to contest the inclusion of particular cost items in the improvement district proceeding and any right they may have under the laws of the State of Oregon to contest the proposed assessment formula. This consent and waiver shall run with the title to the described land and be binding upon the undersigned and all successor owners, for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of the last signature below. The real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) have hereunto set his (their) hand(s) and seal(s) this & day of Autya--O-- C9 C' 19 82. �r (SEAL) (SEAL) Arthur W. Lehr ` (SEAL) (SEAL) Gertrude Lehr �e—z-z (SEAL) (SEAL) Bever Y (SEAL) (SEAL) T oma:ET Co STATE OF OREGON / /_ ) SS. County of lVA-Sh�a s /7 ) On this day of 19 82, personally appeared the above named and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before e: Nota Public for Oregon t� My Commi ss ion expire: C T— 1 i NJ MI gill's ( EXHBIT "A" A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows:. Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Thomas Kessler , as described in deed recorded November 29, 1930 in Book 119, Page 592, of Washington County Deed Records; thence North 16 rods; thence East parallel to the South line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods ; thence South parallel to the East line of said Kessler tract, 16 rods ; thence West 10 rods to the place of beginning , i IIjIIII E i p i e g � 'iF OF C R EC•ON ) ) S5. CGI:I'iC}• � i Wa_ni r.g'cn ) BE IT R M.BERED, that on this day of 19 before. r the un -signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State personally appeared th within named who are known to me o be the identic individuals described in and who executed the wit-.in in ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and volu arily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hr.-cr.-,into seg rry ha n and seal his day o: —, 19 Notar}, Pu is for Oregon , y C ss on Expires: ./� da of , 19 ,, L Reviewed ac. to form this ` Y By,. qty At orn y ty of Tigard ,i 19 g Z Revi�.w=d -;s a legal description this day of / _ By: - f t g Aper: :. d t t; _ day o \ 92r2 ---• CITY OF TT_aARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION By: Chair an AppROVED kND ACCEPTED this day of , 19 . hY zesc�.: : •c" •,f the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand __. City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon _ t F I LE -� TAX MAP: / //A�- TAX LOT: 30?00 ;�,7Di: Sa- G �ci r Qr CONSENT COVENANT (NON-REMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT) Street Improvements The undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby rec %rd their consent to the formation of a local improvement district by the City of Tigard fo _he purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property abuts. The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to oppose or remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the abutting street or streets, reserving only the right to contest the inclusion of particular cost items in the improvement district oroceeding and any right they may have under the laws of the State of Oregon to contest the proposed assessment formula. This consent and waiver shall run with the title to the described land and be binding upc7- the undersigned and all successor owners, for a period of fifteen (15) years from 'the date of the last signature below. The real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) have hereunto set his (their) hand(s) and seal(s) this _ day of L�C: 15Dtl 19 (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF OREGON ) SS_ County of OJ4541l1S77m ) on this _�l day of �e.•1-P A)e/^ 19 personally appeared the above named , . and acknowledged the foregoing Instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Before me: •*otary--PubiCC-iz--for—Oregon �� (` My coumission expire: - IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIMMmil 11M no IN,M_No I0, EXHBIT " A" A tract of land in the Southwest quarter_ of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South , Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract of land convey3d to Thomas Kessler , as described in deed recorded November 29, 1930 in Book 119 , Page 592, of Washington County Deed Records; thence North 16 rods ; thence East parallel to the South line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods ; thence South parallel to the East line of said Kessler tract, 16 rods ; thence West 10 rods to the place of beginning. i TE. OF CR�C•ON WIN ss. Cocnty cf ws_nington } BE IT R . MBERED, that on this day of 19 beEcc�: r: the un signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State personally appeared th within named who are known to me o be the identic individuals described in and who executed the within in ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and volur arily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i h3:•e r,.rc-t1nt0 se: my has and seal his day o: 19 Notary Pu ic. for Oregon My C i S on Expires: - day of 19 �-- Reviewed as to form this Y By. C-- Y At me f Tigard • rI l9 Revi.:w::d �s 'o Legal description this —A day of _ � By: Apprc. -d t • _ Fit- -t day of Y ��"� 98 Z� CITY OF TT_GARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION I By: Chair an APPROVED 4ND ACCEPTED this day of ' 19 ' h5 iescl._:`.:�� ;:F the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon wow P RODE.'4 N ti•I: FILE REF E RE NCE 4 TAX ;iDDP.ES;�:_gq95 Sys• Sat ter Tia arc , OR LLP= 2S 1 11AC TAX LOT: STREET DEDICATION !=J BY THESE PPESENTS, THAT Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr i hereinafter called grantor(s), for the su.a Of $1.00 constituting the actual consideration for this deed, do hereby give, grant and dedicate to the Public, its successors and assigns, a oerpetual right-of-:ray and easement for street, road and utility Purposes on, over, across, Linder, along and within the following described real premises in Washington Countv, Oregon SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" To Have and to Hold the above described and dedicated rights unto the Public for the uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantor(s) hereby covenants that-he (they) are the owner(s) in fee simple and have a good and legai .right to grant his (their) rights above described. 1N WITNESS 4MEREOF, the grantor(s) have hereunto set ztA3 (their) hand(s) --rid seal(s) OG d$r 19 82 this day of `- (SEAL) (SEAL) � =thur W. Lehr (S. AL) (SEAL) t -�rtrud Le r (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) STATE OF O N. ) SS. County of �fc S rI t r) A ) on this _ day of - &c�o�r 19 82 Personally appeared the above named � n Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr T 6�t C oX 4 �Fyc.�C•� �T� and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. Be f ore 7:1 No ry Public for Oregon My Commission expire : s/i�sA EXIiBIT "A" A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Thomas Kessler , as described in deed recorded November 29, 1930 in Book 119, Page 592, of Washington County Teed Records ; thence North 16 rods; thence Fast parallel to the South line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods; thence South parallel to the East line of said Kessler tract, 16 rods; thence West 10 rods to the place of beginning . This easement is limited to a strip of. land 10 feet wide across the Southern boundary of the described tract of land and paralleling the North side of SW Sattler Street, extending from- the t Eastern boundary to the Western boundary of said tract. C, TE OF CR£t•ON ) ss. County - f W,�= ;i ngton ) BE IT R MBERED, that on this day of 19 befer a:. Lhez un signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State personaLLy appeared th within named who are known to me o be the identic individuals described in and who executed the wit*rin ins ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and vol.+r arily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i hn-�:e br_tctvnto set my- ha n and seal his day o: , 19 Notar}r Pu _ is for Oregon My C ' ss on Expires: Reviewed as to form this � day of P 19 n By: r City At rn y - City of Tigard • 19 Revi,Lw.=d =;s t-o legal description this day of ' By: `i day o f / Apprc:•, a t . _ �. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION By: Chair an APPROVED AND ACCEPTED this day of , 19 by .;f the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand _City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon .___� BY ^t�S= �?=S=`TS, T:-iAT Arthur W_ Lehr and Gertrude Lehr .._i.l -- called r-ZItOr(.J) I for tyle sum of $1 _-1 _C.1 constit .ting the actual cozsid=_rat:ion for this de-ad, do ne'2bv give , grant and dedicate to t-he PUbl?c, Its successors and assigns, a perpetual ri c t-cf----av arid ease=`-=it for street, road and utility pu^oses on, over, across, cancer, alcn.g and •«ith-n the follo::i ns Escri�c _eal - -ses in LCas il nctnz SEE A=A`HED To Have and to Bold the a:Ove descr'JeG and dedicated r=,t:ts unto the Public for the uses and O'._27 u s e s a r2 i^a_oO VZ stated_ . e gra_-zor(s) hereby coVenaZ is t.''.3t:I� (thev) art o O:•-:e={S) 171 iee 51�?ie and have a good and legal _iclt to grant his (their) rights above described. I`7 ivI�.SS —HEREOF, tale grantor(s) have hereunto set -1'iS (their) hand(s) and seal(s) this � � day of ��'/� . 19 82 (S EAI.) (S-AL) +� Arthur W. Lehr (cZAL) (SE?.L). Gertrude Lehr (SEAL) (SEAL) S=1A . OF CREGON ) SS- Co On thisi / day of - (�� .j^� / 1982• personally appeared the above armed Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr ,!-'` i, , �T+,fi <.;� f ��;,'i�� /(•fix 'v and ac.—nowledged the foregoing i_nstrx-nent to be their voluntary act and deed_ Before me: :IO`_2Zy Public for Oregon _ My Co.Sssion ex-oire : EXHBIT " A" f A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard , County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Thomas Kessler , as described in deed recorded November 29 , 1930 in Book 119 , Page 592, of Washington County Deed Records; thence North 16 rods; thence East parallel to the South line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods; thence South parallel to the East line of said Kessler tract, 16 rods; thence West 10 rods to the place of beginning. This easement is limited to a strip of land 10 feet wide across the Southern boundary of the described tract of land and paralleling the North side of SW Sattler Street, extending from the Eastern boundary to the Western boundary of said tract. P C Elam IE OF CRE:GON ) ss. CoLr-,ty f wa;nington ) BE IT R MBERED, that on this day of 19 befor<. r= thr un . signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State personally appeared th within named who are known to me o be the identic individuals described in and who executed the within ins ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and vol'-r arily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I ha•.e hraevnto set my ha n and seal his day of , 19 Notary Pu . is for Oregon My C 'ss on Expires: "/ � Z Reviewed as to form this da� Y of 19 By: A City o n y -/City of Tigard ` 19 g 7 Rev;...w:=d as to legal description this day of 0�1 9 Appr•�.-� � �L. t•,..� `r day o f r✓t +t- 1=— CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION i By: Chair n , � APPROVED AND ACCEPTED this day of 19 by ;f the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand _City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon C ' - tnawieoal FORM No.]ll—QUIT t.LDIED ��---- — u"" gIa -- -- QUITCLAIM DEED [,rL."" That .ARTHUR W"--. LEHR. GERTR ntor, • I hereinafter called KNOW ALL b1EN BY THESE PRESENTS, LEHR _ _ �. 4AN COX Pntirety.- ' for the consideration hereinafter stated,doss hereby remise,release and quitclaim unto BEV£RT'Y"`Jttle and interest ; an al. THOMAS.COXA. as...tenants .by.....tne grantor's s right, appurtenance thereunto belonging or in any- hereinafter called grantee,and unto grantee's heirs,successors and assigns all n the in that certain real property with the tenements, heredifame7fs and a State of Oregon, described as follows, to-m•ff: i �I wise appertaining,situated in the County of. .WaShTlgtO. known that is described as the north seventy That certain parcel of land - seven feet ;77') of that certain tract o£ land commonly Lehr by as 9495 S-1-1. SattlerwStreehich tracand n ,eyeisdescdribedto Aas folloc%s Book 252 at page 17 2 South, Range 1 Wcst of t1Le A tract of land in the southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township and, County o: tgillamette Meridian, in the City es Tigard, Washington and State of "Ore described as follo�+'s= Beginning at the Soutllwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Thomas Kessler, as described in deed recorded LQeed er 29• o T m Book 119, Page 592• of Washington Count- Decd Records: thence NortTz 16 rods; thence East parallel to the Southto tl)c line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods; thence South enc ua We st 10 rods T_ast line of said Kessler tract, to the place of beginning- This deed represents a transfer which actually occurred in approximately 1956. IIF SPACE INSUFFICIENT.CONsuccessors and assigns TINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SI DEI To Have and to Hold the same unto the said-grantee and grantee's heirs, forever. aid for this Transfer,stated in terms of dollars,is$- prom which is or value given or p The true and actual consideration p Nlalba dale!" L OHowever, the actual consideration consists of or incluR Tse nTeepelMApl aaL/e aha eenTenLe-Set'r ra mm a tical the whole consideration firtt3icaYtr�relr��Te parratYhe I ; 1 equally to con orations,March individuals, 198 • In construing this deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all g 4 thday of. changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply q duly authorized thereto by In Witness Whereof, the grantor has executed this instrument this- if a corporate grantor.it has caused its name to be signed and seal affixed by tis/officers, order of its board of directors. Le_...e Arthur W. r............. Gertrude . .'. 111•z,rut.d by a ro,a.ratien. .�J ( �. .. ..... ............. ... .. .. Gertrude Lehr )ss. STATE OF OREGON.County of -- - STATE OF OREGON, ) sa. _„ _._..19 _ and Washing.ton...... Par3ananr appearedCounty of ........ e u won March_4 t 19_81 __. ._.... if being g r Y n. -- �� for the other,did say that the former is t o Personally appeared the above named - and not on ."...._ president and that the!after is th Arthur W• Lehr and Gertrude each for himself .... .secretary o r .acorporation instru- .... end acknoR-ledged the foregoing and that the seat affixed to the foregoing Instrument is the COQ d eacheo �I. their._ ...va to ac d d• of said corporation and that said instrument of fs board of d rectos and ;n be went to Ix._..---- ' hail of said corporation by authority voluntary act and dee Before., hem acknowledged said in tD be its (OFFICIAL Dr Before me: (SEAL SEAL) - ................. Notary Public for Oregon My commission S/^�•Y Z NotarMy commission.expires: y Public for Oregon expires: OF OREGON, Arthur .w "..Lehr. and_._Gertrude._.Lehr. STATE �s. 94$5 SW..Sattier County of ,... OR 97.223. _... - - I certify that the within instr Tigard ANTOR'3 NAME AND ADORE34 _ aR ment was received for record on t {i B--yerly....Cox and Thomas Cox. day of.... ------------dre.... I� 14860 SW 96th _ at .............oclock.... .,an I o i OR 97223 RESERVED Tigard, SPICE nPage _ . ............... .. .........................._A C AND ADOw E33 in book - aaAN*ccs NwN row I! file/reel number _. At—ri—din!r•tam"' RCCO RO[R'!U![ Richard""__A._-..Carlson,...-Atty-• at Law Record of Deeds my county. Witness my hand and seal 510 20_0 SW Market. -- Portland, OR 97201 Count affixed. f --....--- NA E.ADDRE!!.X _ ....... n agar.... ................................•---• ..r.ii...De- IF r.aa.Ftod all tat st,_.b.ba11 b.uwt F.IM Is11.a,iwy Recording Off Until a,bawl• a5 COx Bever! Cox and Thom By ... ............................ •-.... ..... t............................. .__..........._..._..-.........._... .................... ............. ---- T i.g a.rd.,..._QR....9.7.2 2 ........_................_........_............ --- NAME.ADDR[!6.ZI• ------ --_--._._tel-- : � OUITCl41M DEED lih'OlS' ALL WEN B)' 'NESE PRESENTS, That ARTHUR W. LEHR and. GERTRUDE LEHR _ hereinafter called grantor, for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby remise,release and quitclaim unto HEVERLY...JEAN COX and THObLAS COX,, as__.tenants..by...the_.,entirety_ herriralrer called grantee,and unto grantee's heirs,successors and assigns all of the grantor's right, title and interest in that certain real property with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or it, any- ::ashi ton ,State of Oregon.described as fo!/ou-s, ro-n•rt: wise aaoe:taining,stuared in the Covnfv of 1''7 That certain parcel of land that is described as the north sevent seven feet (77') of that certain tract of land cot-Tonly kno.,n as 9495 S.W. Sattler Street and conveyed to Arthur 1•I- Lehr by took 252 at page 17 which tract is described as follows: A tract of land in the South,.:est quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Tow-nship 2 South, Range 1 i:est Of the l:i llamette 1•lericiar., in the City of Tigard, County of %%ashir.gton and State of Oregon, described as fol to::s: Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract or land conveyed to Thomas Kessler, as described in deed recorded l.ovember 29, 1930 in Book. 119, Page 592, of Washington Counzv Deed Records; thence North 16 rods; thence East parallel to the South line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods; thence South p?rallcl tO the Fast line of said Kessler tract, 1G rods; thcnc_u :vest lU rods to the place of beginning_ This deed represents a transfer which actually occurred in approximately 1956. II, Sp CE rvSVF,ICtE,+l. C01+1n-E WSC-1I011 Ori [E�E•^.S! SIDE• To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns fore,er. The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars,is$ 0 ' OHo,vever, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or T-alue given or promised which is rhe..hole consideration i`irldiiarea-hiehJ.'(T,�senTenFrZ,cr.-rrc*•N.+ ----+ '=�f-+�"'•rn'^"t"�'-`""'Id t"`1'""••'-�"O-�ia�^,D, Pati L.�." In construing this deed and-Here the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to eor orations and to individuals. In licitness Whereof,the grantor has executed this instrument this thday of March if a corporate grantor.it has caused its name to be signed and seal affixed by its officers,duly authorized thereto by Order of its board of directors. i Arthur W. Lehr Erl....�•d b•v,v,ev,o..ve. ..... eN.•,v.p s•e..•.vl, - Gertrude Lehr STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON,County•of .... .- }u. sa. Cn nr, of Washington. _ ) _. ...._,l9 March 4-. , 19 81 . Personally appeared _...... and named _....__......._......_........... ..ho,the duly s.+nen, F.sonally a geared the above - ��--`-�-� -' i--rtnur Z. Lehr and Gertrude each for hirruelf and not one for the other,did say that the lorn+cr is rhe __...........- _.._.... .................................... Lehr _ nreaident a.d that the atter u r e .. ._. .. - .... .-. ... _ seuerary of and acjno..1,-died the foregoing imrru- and that the seal affixed to the to.egoine irsrrvnarnt i[ the crit purarr vat merit ro be their o• d d. o/ said corporation and thar said insvun ..as signed and .ralyd in be- Sel � half of said ao:porarion by authority o!in ba•ard o1.dmrcr<.r a: and tach d. (OFFICIAL •hem ackno-I.dged .aid br its insrrurrnr ra .c act end d-rd. SEAL) 11x1 a me: No:ar. Public fur Orr@on (SEAL) bfy enavr�ssion ra puce: ,S/•�S/�Z Notary Public for Oregon My mrrvrl:sscon esai.es: =:thug W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr- STATE OF OREGON, 9485 S'v: Sattler -Tigard, OR 97223 __ County of J ...... [. [.. I certify that the within +rstrv- _Beverly_ Cox and__Tho;?as_Cox__. _ _. _-_ merit was recei.•ed for record on the S 14860 W 96th _ day of........ .. 19. --Tigard,_ OR-97223 -' _ et oelocJ:....M.,and recorded -_ ca•w+[[s..•r[.sem.»e[ss svC[.acs[.vcD in book._ ..... on page.... or as .cc o.�ca�s uac fi/e,'rre7 number .. .. .. _Richard A. Carlson, Atty. at Law Record of Deeds of said county. 200 SW Market - 570 Witn-ss my hand and seal of PortlandO 47201 County allized. --- r U.,;I.d•e•y:...e..•,.I en,e,..e,...•..w.beer►.....•..w,.r..�:..s eed,.... -.Beverly Cox and Tho-as Cox RecordingOHicer 14860 St; 96th - By _ .. ....__. D:p:-r r, .Tigard, OR 97223 '[E. OF CRE'.--O% ) r c;Cr:ty t W�:,n: r,�tcn ) BE IT R . "KBERED, that on this day of 19 bGfer r e` un signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State personally appeared th within named who are known to me o be the identic individuals described in and who executed the within ir., ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and voL-r ariiy. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i has•e br:-ce-unto se: my ha n and seal his day of 19 Notar}, Du . is for Oregon My C is on Expires: ' Reviewed t., form this 3-)4- day of P i9 f�— By. of Tigard City tt r y t Y `g • day o f a✓, 19 � Revi.,-.w.-d ;;s !:c legal description this day of 'pa6iJ 19 Appr: . : t': CITY OF TIS=ARD, OREGON PLANNING COMDiISSION By: Cha"r n }• of 19 ' by APPROVED kND ACCEPTED this da L::so?. . :f the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon 1 i i AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT C 4 THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day `s of 1982 by and between ARTHUR W. LEHR and i GERTRUDE LEHR, hereinafter called the first parties, and { BEVERLY JEAN COX and THOMAS COX, hereinafter called the second parties; i WITNESSETH: a WHEREAS: The first parties are the record owners of the following described parcel of real property to-wit: A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Thomas Kessler, as described in deed recorded November 29, 1930 in Book 119, Page 592, of Washington County Deed Records; thence North 16 rods; thence East parallel to the South S line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods; thence South parallel to the East line of a said Kessler tract, 16 rods; thence West 10 rods to the place of beginning. t ! WHEREAS: First parties have on the 4th day of March, 1981 executed a Quitclaim Deed whereby a portion of that tract of land described above, to-wit the North Seventy-Seven (77) feet, is conveyed to the second parties; NOW THEREFORE, in view of the premises and in con- sideration of $1.00 and other valuable consideration by the second parties to the first parties, the receipt of all which hereby is acknowledged by the first parties, it is agreed as follows: The first parties do hereby grant, assign and Set over to the second parties; 1. A perpetual and nonexclusive easement of right of way over and across the portion of the above described tract retained by the first parties, said easement to be limited to a strip of land 16 feet wide and parallel to and adjacent to the East property line, extending from the partition line South to the Southerly boundary of said tract of land, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. A perpetual and nonexclusive easement over and across the portion of the above described tract retained by the first parties for the purpose of installing or maintaining utility lines, said easement to be limited to a strip of land within the easement of way granted in paragraph one (1) above, specifically the West 8 feet, to to run from the partition line South to the Southerly boundary of said tract of land, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. r } 3. A perpetual and nonexclusive easement over and across the above described tract retained by the first parties, for the purpose of a septic tan'= drain field, said easement to be in an area adjacent to the partition line, extending South from said line for a distance of 70 feet, and running from a point 50 feet West of the East property line to a point 85 feet West of the East property line, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The second parties shall have all rights of ingress and egress to and from said real estate (including the right from time to time to cut, trim and remove trees, brush, overhanging branches and other obstructions) necessary for the second parties' use, enjoyment, operation and maintenance of the easement hereby granted and all rights and privileges incident thereto. Except as to the rights herein granted, the first parties shall have the full use and control of the above described real estate. The second parties hereby agree to hold and save the first parties harmless from any and all claims of third parties arising from second parties' use of the rights herein granted. The easements granted hereunder shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the portion of the tract described above which has been granted to the second parties, and shall run with the land and shall continue so long as said easements are used for the purposes above specified; and if said ease— ments shall no longer be used for said purposes, the easements and all rights hereunder shall immediately and without any action on the part of second parties, their heirs and assigns, revert and revest in the first parties, their heirs and assigns as fully and completely as though this grant of easement had t, never been made. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed this instrument in duplicate on this, the day and year first hereinabove written. J Arthur W. nnLehr � Q Gertrude Lehr STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of 411&,11A[7t>� On this // day of 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr, known to me to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed said instrument freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day a ar last above written. tary Public for Oregon My Commission expires: 4everlx Thomas ox STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of ) On this _/ day of /)C�rO{jC.e' 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in 'nd for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Beverly Jean Cox and Thomas Cox, known to me to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed said- instrument freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. % x Notary Public for Oregon My Commission expires: AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr and Beverly Jean Cox and Thomas Cox AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: EXHIBIT "A" -- 10 Ron 5 -- - -- --� R!~SI r7�N CE lu u '�tti r -r- lie — VP_A i N FI�tlD.�' t �:. CIL 3 I cc 141 cx 2 GAP2i16t t RES DE NCE 1 q4 a6- ` 5ATrLE R 5 T-REET . t S faEcT 'DEDiC-ATION } i�;o r tU. A Y e '9 a : e • � • t I 4 1 TE OF CR�GON ) ss. Cc�:r,cy c f Wa_r i ng:cn ) BE IT R MBERED, that on this day of L9 befer�. r ifs un signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State personally appeared th within named who are known to me o be the idenric individuals described in and who executed the within ir. um and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and volar arily. IN 'TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i have hetc-unto se: my ha n and seal his day of 19 Notary Pu is for Oregon My C iss n Expires: , 9 � Z Reviewed as to form this e.l 4 day of i By. City to - y of Tigard � • p _�- �ve 19 �Z Revi.�w.=d 3s .'.o Legal description this day of By: 'T Appnc:d t _ Ci` day of \ ' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION By: Chair an y� of , 19 � by APPROVED AND ACCEPTED this da the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand City Recorder; Tigard, Oregon L t C � AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT �^ THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of (X K_ n.1982 by and between ARTHUR W. HR and GERTRUDE hereinafter called the first parties, and BEVERLY JEAN COX and THOMAS COX, hereinafter called the second parties; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS: The first parties are the record owners of the following described parcel of real property to-wit: A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 11, Township 2'South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Thomas Kessler, as described in deed recorded November 29, 1930 in Book 119, Page 592, of Washington County Deed Records; thence North 16 rods; thence East parallel to the South line of said Kessler tract, 10 rods; thence South parallel to the East line of said Kessler tract, 16 rods; thence West 10 rods to the place of beginning. WHEREAS: First parties have on the 4th day of March, 1981 executed a Quitclaim Deed whereby a portion of that tract of land described above, to-wit the North Seventy-Seven (77) feet, is conveyed to the second parties; NOW THEREFORE, in view of the premises and in con- sideration of 51.00 and other valuable consideration by the second parties to the first parties, the receipt of all which hereby is acknowledged by the first parties, it is agreed as follows: The first parties do hereby grant, assign and set over to the second parties; t 1. A perpetual and nonexclusive easement of right of 4 way over and across the portion of the above described tract retained by the first parties, said easement to be limited to a strip of land 16 feet wide and parallel to and adjacent to the East property line, extending from the partition line South to the Southerly boundary of said tract of land, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. A perpetual and nonexclusive easement over and across the portion of the above described tract retained by the first parties for the purpose of installing or maintaining utility lines, said easement to be limited to a strip of land within the easement of way granted in paragraph one (1) above, specifically the West 8 feet, to to run from the partition line South to the Southerly boundary of said tract of land, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. i 4 3, A perpetual and nonexclusive easement over and across the above described tract retained by the first parties, for the purpose of a septic tank drain field, said easement to be in an area adjacent to the partition line, extending South from said line for a distance of 70 feet, and running from a point 50 feet West o` the East property line to a point 85 feet West of the East property line, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The second parties shall have all rights of ingress id real estate (including the right and egress to and from sa from time to time to cut, trim and remove trees, brush, overhanging branches and other obstructions) necessary nancerofhe second parties use, enjoyment, maintenance the easement hereby granted and all rights and privileges incident thereto. Except as to the rights herein granted, the first parties shall have -the full use and control of the above described real estate. The second parties hereby agree to hold and save the first parties harmless from any and all claims of third pa rties arising from second parties' use of the rights herein granted. The easements granted hereunder shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the portion of the tract described above which has been granted to the second parties, and shall run with the land and shall continue so long as said easements are used for the purposes above specified; and if said ease- ments shall no longer be used for said purposes, the easements and all rights hereunder shall immediately and without any action on the part of second parties, their heirs and assigns, revert and revest in the first parties, their heirs and assigns as fully and completely as though this grant of easement had never been made. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed this instrument in duplicate on this, the day and year hereinabove written. Arthur W. Lehr Gertrude Lehr STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of (NQS , ) da of 0 4 �6Q/' . 1982, before On this Y me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr, known to me to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed said instrument freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I hay-e4ereunto set my hand and ,. affixed my official seal the dayafidylear last a ov written. N tary Public for Oregon My Commission expires: i ti x A Beverly, � X Thomas Cox, �. STATE OF OREGON ) `�)ss.ss. County of in .� ) � On this �� day of 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in 'nd for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Beverly Jean Cox and Thomas Cox, known to me to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed said instrument freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day a ar lasb written. N ary Public_ for Oregon My Commission expires: , -7S AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT Arthur W. Lehr and Gertrude Lehr and Beverly Jean Cox and Thomas Cox AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: i t •x Al ig OWN--�M- B.XHlBrr "A" r i t — t�54 r r z QILI Cr ►_ `i1 C C�P.2'-r?u t I �J♦ R�� rvcNCc REQS ° SArrLtE R ;5rRr6T ' r Niv ST�cc ✓c�rCArrcrJ A 6 E N G^r' �� TE OF CR�GON ) ss. Count Wn.ni r.gtcn ) BE IT R MBERED, that on this day of L9 odor r_ th? un signed a tlotary Public in for the said County and State personally appeared th within named who are known to me o be th-e idenr_ic individuals described in and who executed the within ir_ ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and vola arily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hr--leunto se` my ha n and seal his day of 19 Notar}• Pu Lc for Oregon , M • C iss on Expires: da of 19 Reviewed as to form this Y By. City t orn - City of Tigard , 19 �Z Revi,w d as to legal description this C)G day of � By: — Q 1_. day of t+t_. 9 Appr.. `d CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION By: Chai an APPROVED AND ACCEPTED this day of 19 by L c SC:l ;, '•��^ ;;f the Tigard City Council- Witness ouncil.Witness my hand on Ore City Recorder; Tigard, g Pi J:EI i NAI•ic: FILE #: ADDRESS: TAX MAP: TAX LOT: CONSENT COVENANT (IJONP.EMONSTRANCE AGREEKENT) Street Improvements The undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby record their consent to the formation of a local improvement district by the City of Tigard £or the purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property a)l, The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to oppose or remonstrate against tate formation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the abutting street or streets, reserving only the right to contest the inclusion of particular cost items i• he improvement district proceeding and any right they may have under the laws of the State of Oregon to contest the proposed assessment formula. This consent and waiver shall run with the title to the described land and be binding upon the undersigned and all successor owners, for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of the last signature below. The real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" P. FIC GAD'_BLE ROBINSON COMPANY ByBy A CORPORATION AC:CNOWLEDGEMENT �- r STATE OF 30=90M Washington ) SS County of KXI- of_ chi s day of 19 Z before me appeared Douglas S. Gamble �Lnd E. W. Sandygren both to me personally known, who being duly . sworn, did say that he, the said Douglas S. Gamble is the President, and he, the said E. W: Sandygren is the Secretary of PACIFIC GAMBLE ROBINSON CO_ , the within nase Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and Douglas S. Gamble and E. W. Sandygren acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY W"r-TEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed. my_official seal th�ay and_ynar_.l.ast-above written. C - -- ------ - ---- CNotary Public for MRQW Washington, residing at My Commission E ices 9 _ I;EEIIIZ i i� ---The following, described real property, situated in the City o` Tigard, in the County of V,ashl ngton and State of Oregon : A tract of land in Section 2 , Tc:-:nship 2 South, Rai < e 1 Fest more p7-.r-icularly described asfollows : B-GINNING at the intersection of the Northwesterly line of the William Graha«i Donation Land Clam No. 39 , with the Northeasterly boundary of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence N'orth 42'29 ' Hest, along the :crtheasterly line of said right-of Way and along the Southwestern line of morins ' Addition To Tigard (no:v vacated) , a distance of 5-56. 84 feet to the most Westerly corner of Lot 17; Morins' addition, (nota vacated) ; thence North E=s-,-, along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 17 , a distance of 130 feet, more or less , to a point on the Southwest- erly line of Commercial Street; thence Southeasterly, tracin5 the boundary of said Street, 530 feet, more or less, to an inter- sectio:_ :•:ith the h7orthwesterly boundary of State Highway No_ 217; thence Easterly and Southerly, tracing the boundary of said highway, to an intersection %-,,it* the Northwesterly line of the William Graham Donation Land Claim; thence South 42905 ' West, along said Donation Land Claim 1_ne, to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING the Northwesterly 20 feet of .-the above described tract, to be measured off on a line drawn parallel with the Northwesterly line of Lot 17, Morins' Addition to Tigard (now vacated) .--- FEEM i ICONSENT MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF - PACIFIC GAMBLE ROBINSON CO. The undersigned, being all of the members of the Executive Committee of PACIFIC GAMBLE ROBINSON CO. , a Delaware corporation, acting with- the authority of the Board of Directors, adopt the following resolutions by consent in lieu of a special meeting caped for the purpose: RESOLVED, in connection with the Tigard, Oregon, store, Douglas S. Gamble, President, and E.W. Sandygren, Vice President, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver on behalf of the corporation a Nonremonstrance Agreement regarding the formation of a local improvement district by the- City of Tigard in the form attached hereto. DATED: September 27, 1982. i Dougl S. Gamble c W. Sandygren E. A. Thompso Jill lJJJJJJJJM EHIBI T T� ---The following described real croperty, situated in the City of Tigard, in the County of v7ash i ng ton and State of Oregon : A tract of land in Section 2 , Tc:•rnship 2 South, Range 1 West more particularly described as follows: B.GIc:\ItiG at the intersection o= the Northwesterly line of the Ji_lliam Graham Donation Land Claim No- 39 , with the lortheasterly boundary of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-`gay; thence North 42'29 ' West, along the e:or-heasterly line of said right-0f- �;av and along the Southwestern line of Morins ' AdditioQ To Tigard (now vacated) , a distance of 550' . 84 feet to the rios� este..ly _ Cerner of Lot 17; i:orin$' Addition, (now vacated) ; thence North -44048" East, along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 17 , a distance or "130 feet," more or less , to a point on the Southwest- erly lire of -v Conercial Street; thence Southeasterly, tracinq the boundary of said Street, 530 feet,' more or less, to an inter- section with the t;orthwesterly boundary of State Highway No. 217; the i:esterly and Southerly, tracing the boundary of said high�•:ay, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of the William Graham Donation Land Claim; thence South 42005 ' "gest, along s'a_d Donation Land Claim line, to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING the Northwesterly 20 feet of "the above described tract, to be mersured off on a line drat.n parallel with the Northwesterly line of Lot 17, Viorins' Addition" to Tigard (nota vacated) -- • FILE �: E C i :I1 •L : TAX MAP: TAX LOT: CO`ISENT COVET?:"JT (I401R.E_t•I0NSTRANCE AGREEMENT) Street Improvements e undersigned owners (including purchasers) of the real property described below do hereby cord their consent to the formation of a local City of Tigard l improvement district by the r the purposes of improving the public street or streets upon which the described property ut- The undersigned expressly waive all present and future rights to opposes or remonstrate ax.-__t the formation of a local improvement district for the improvement of the abutting st. ms reet or streets, reserving only the right to contethe inchaveouof nder the lawsrof theicOstte improvement district proceeding and any right they may ate of Oregon to contest the proposed assessment formula. tie to the described land and is consent and waiver shall run with the tiyears from upon fro the e undersig ►ed .-i and all successor owners, for a period of fifteen (15) y ate of the last signature below- he real property that is the subject of this consent covenant is described as follows= SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" CORpOPATION ACKNa-MEDGEN3BN:T STATE OF 30R== Washington ) SS- County S-County of Ong pis I-6L day of ,�y„ a- n�. , 19 Q Z before me appeared Douglas S. Gamble an.* E. W. Sandygren both to me personally known, who being duly . P sr,„,orn, did say that he, the said Douglas .S_ Gamble is the President, and he, the said E. W: Sandygren - is the Secretary of PACIFIC GANMLE ROBINSON CO-, the within nase Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of ics Board of Directors, and Douglas S. Gamble and E. W. Sandygren acknowledged said instrument to be the free i act and deed of said corporation- IN TESTIMOVY 5THEREOr, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed •^y�:.fici�� P_, the �a� �rLa ._yast-alcove-writt-� . Notary Public for p% Washington, residing atVIA..- Comiaission E ires AL TE OF CRF.ON ) ss. CGLnL} Cf w ni.r.gton ) da of 19 BE IT R MBERED, that on this `l oeforF cr= the un signed a Notary Public in for the said County and State �ersor_ally appeared th within named who are known to me o be the iden�ic individuals described in and who executed the within in ument and acknowledged to e that they executed the same freely and vols arily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have br-mctunto set my ha n and seal his day of ' 19 Notar}• Pu is for Oregon My C i s on Expires: t da of 19 Levi._-wed as to form this / y By. ney - ty of Tigard (� , �z- RevS..w�d �s Lo legal description this day of 19 By: —_ APer,,•,r d t•, - GSC--'= day of -- ' 9B2— CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PLANNING COMMISSION By: •Chair an , APPROVED AND ACCEPTED this day o f 19 by the Tigard City Council. Witness my hand City__Recorder; Tigard, Oregon � 1r 1� rr C9T1f F TM WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON t MEMO October 22, 1982 TO: Ed Sullivan FROM: Doris Hartig/ City Recorder lAba-ul Please approve the enclosed document_sas to form, sign in the appropriate place on each and return to Loreen or me at the Council meeting Monday night. Some of the documents have more than 1 original. Please sign off on each document so the grantor will have a signed original for his file. The last item is an agreement that Hyster would like to enter into with the City, but before we ask them to sign, we would appreciate t having you look it over. Thank you. P Doris Hartig 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.80X 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 9722'1 PH:639-' 171 1 of i IL a Teleohone (206) 2518300 7890 SOUTH 188th STREET �-0Y . !CENT,WASHINGTON 98032 October 14 , 1982 Elizabeth A. Newton Associate Planner City of Tigard P. 0 . Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Prairie Market No . 412 8950 S. W. Commercial St . Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ms . Newton: Enclosed is our consent agreement on the subject property. We have had two landscaping companies submit proposals . We would like to use Wyatt ' s Landscaping of Tualatin, Oregon, if their design meets your approval . With these things completed, when can we pick up the building permit? Yours very truly, T. H. Crosley Manager of Store Development THC:mb Enclosures cc: Perry Coleman, General Contractor E. Carl Schiewe Company F t 1 f October 13 , 1982 MS. Liz Newton City of Tigard Planning Dept. PO sox 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 t Re: Partition Request MLP4-79 i Dear Ms. Newton: 1 i Pursuant to our telephone conversation of October 12 l and prior conversations which we have had enclosed are the originals of documents in the above matter for official approval by your office and filing. The documents include a Quitclaim Deed, Agreement for Easement with accompanying exhibit and a Street Dedication and Nonremonstrance Agreement. I have enclosed originals and one extra copy of each of these documents. Could you please follow this up by filling out the enclosed postcard and returning it to us to let us know when the documents have been filed with Washington County. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, i Patricia L. Thompson PLT:ksm Enclosure cc: Arthur Lehr t I } ' 4 1 TO. TIGARD COt1MUNITY YOUTri SERVICES BOARD DEQ FROM:BILL ENUDSEN RE: DIRECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT, OCTOBER, 1982 OVERVIEW The expected increase in counselirn_i referrals hit us in October as 23 youth were referred for that service bringing to 48 the number referred since July 1, 1982. (This figure does not include the 70 employment referrals since July 1.) 53 were referred for counseling during the same period last year. Referrals as of mid-November stand at 6; the ideal rate for two counselors would be 10 to 15 Der month. Linda has applied lots of energy to taking on the role of alcohol/drug counselor. She has attended two workshops on drug issues and has joined a training group focusing on resistent families. She will pay the $60 per month herself but will do it on work time at 2 hours per week for possibly 8 months. s S We have seen an increase in the number of community service placements from both Washington and Clackamas County Community Corrections Departments. We were particularly fortunate to get 65 hours from a young mom who brought her two month old baby and covered the front desk for us quite well. One of the best things to happen in a long time has been the help provided by Robbie Cole, a cory unity volunteer who read about our need for volunteers in the f Times. In addition to her typing and phone/front desk reception, Robbie has been making follow-up contacts with our clients and gathering lots of valuable information on how we are doing. Among her findings: of 43 contacted so far, 77% were parents, 72% said we provided partial or better progress toward their goals (55% said substantial or better) , 780 of parents had a positive experience, 92% would reconvv nd us, and 75% want to be notified about activities. I think we should take this information as a pat on the i back given that 61% of our kids and families are referred to us by someone other than themselves or their parents. It means we are succeeding in break- ing through much of the resistence many families have at being told by someone outside the family(referral source)that they should seek help to change dearly held patterns of family interaction from yet someone else outside the family (TCYS) . Even so, follow up reveals when we fail, as with the parent who said TCYS's advice did more damage and caused further alienation in the family. Follow-up tells us the things we ought to be told, and thanks to I Robbie, it is working. EMPLOYMENT October produced a high number of job orders (67) , probably the last high month until next spring. Bob reports job orders have fallen off sharply in November so far. Worsening weather is bound to reduce Kids for Hire job orders i i • I t OCTOBER, 1982 REPORT PAGE TWO and slumping retail business will affect permanent orders. SITE Site Chairman Peg Martin supplied the needed drain tubing to divert water away from our foundation. This should help greatly to control the basement flooding this winter. Our landlady ordered a tune-up for our furnace in late October. While working on the furnace, workmen discovered the exhaust flue was filled with 13 bricks that fell into it when the chimney blew down last winter. I am told we have been breathing more carbon monoxide as a result. Luckily the furnace has not been used much in that time. I have moved into Paul's old office, my fifth so far here. Linda is back in her old office and the kitchen will become one again soon. JUVENILE SERVICES COD24ISSION Data on TCYS employment kids was turned in this month to JSC for its study of court reinvolvement. We hope this study will affirm last year's study that suggested so strongly that employment reduced the likelihood -that a kid would become reinvolved with the court. CONSORTIUM The Consortium is working with JSC's in tri-county and other youth agencies to develop a unified system of keeping track of the kids we all serve. Such a unified management information system would help us describe more accurately to possible funding sources what it is we do for whom and what difference it makes. In an age of declining resources, it will pay to have more and better information about our impact. Such unified data would also provide a better basis for addressing institutional and policy issues. BUDGET For the first quarter we spent nearly two thousand dollars more than projected and took in $275 less than expected. By the end of the second quarter, income and expense should be in better synch. The Office Manager position vacancy will save about $800 per month, but more importantly, we will have been aware of our tight financial bind for the entire quarter with spending more approxi- mately monitored. A pro.osal that could cut expenses even more will go to the Personnel Comnittee in late November. FUNDING: Income from fund raisers, Friends of TCYS, and fees have not met projections r t I ' OCTOBER, 1982 REPORT j PAGE THREE i s k so far. The budget's bottom line does not reflect this since unanticipated t income from Rotary and back tax payments have nearly taken up the slack. i We should not relax, however, in our efforts to make our projected income sources produce. For the staff's part, the problem with the fee system is mainly that counselors are finding it hard to remember to discuss fees with the clients. I am trying to be more persistent in rerrinding them, and even though it goes against their grain, counselors are trying, too. Sign up for parent education classes has been too low to conduct the classes. The $40-50 fee may be a factor, so we may want to re-consider that issue for the winter term. I have sent out letters of request for $1000 donations to four corporations and will send out more. I am especially in need of any leads that Board members may have as to who might be responsive to such a request. Does your company have a corporate giving program? Are any of you aware of any corporations that have interest in delinquency prevention or alcohol/drug abuse treatment or employment? So far I have asked Intel, U.S. National Bank, Plaid Pantry and Tektronix. First Interstate, Murdock Trust, Oregon Commmity Foundation, Floating Point Systems and Nike are on my list. PERSONNEL Karen Stuntz has been hired on a temporary basis to fill the quarter-time JSC funded part of the Office Manager's position. She has been doing a great job for Bob in addition to which she has filled in occassionally doing phone and desk reception. BOARD Two members resigned from the Board this month, Doug Mortensen and Garth Potts. Doug acknowledged some limitations he felt in providing what the agency needs from its Board at this time and has stepped aside hoping another with more appropriate resources could be found. Garth has accepted a position with a Jewish commmity center in Vancouver, B.C. and will move up there in December. The Board will miss his insight and clarity of expression. Both leave with the grateful acknowledgement of the staff for the energy and support they have provided. t i Ol co 6 ❑ E N cn C N c!J H O v `n oCl) ODro ~-+ O v'1111I` c w "I u'w td m t H 4)• u ,� r W '1 cn .O r'f d N N GJ r c G v..a m C7 W d O O r W cn Q` ^ N cPl co cc .rl m U'1 N O d u w p rn v i y m o �, 'n vii d 44 lO N O .O oo N O O f r — 'o Wvn -zt. u'1 c'f N .n ^ O1 c'1 --T N c i O, •tt S C O O En w N { f W m s b rn W o aui y c) �+ { a a w y v2 A N H ✓i c i O W b N Ln .— E,y c0 'a k'+ Uw y N I � r � cli v`ni d A Ico U c�Ci 4 --Na y O of C `o amF U •I I L �cc,N d d O r•1 L O! m H 0 -4 1 Y J-3 r i W E W I r-1 y OD N c1I O C rt H C•.i N y y H 1 d d A I W W N r r1 O� Q, cn N N O N N co W RI o n W N T H �p W vl �O al I rn O y b ^ Q W ycnC1 d Ln –Y W N -7 N N O `O C'1 r-� _ �p O C cc1 -t ri O, O� W IO l7 Q� N 01Cli A O C O W v1 cn o+ ' a, w N o N W �O W M d W c`'1II Ln cl) N r r O nN'f N cn c•) O O d O� O i t!1 c'�1 co � W 4 N ^ C'n ^ U v v N O r-c c•1 U m � L m L r+ U al W C P. o <o a v u .� a co H H N > H U PG v •d 6 aoi C tA.c y..i Y, Cr7 C' F H A HA G •C O % U o C N O d m ata Vl U W b L m �•7 L N A N m Q .� WL7 H 5 G d �+ a� b •o 3 H m H •.d O! O d H L M L U N H H ` �.,c w L H d c6 cn m w cn v —4 ai w ,.� a cn C c m H a o L o cc u3 u co a ai W O O 6 0 6 0 U .ti- to E N p., U 0 to C9 6 A O w a, L ro D in s r 1 cn d N rn d r U d•O rn T Cl C) O d m C ooC6 w + V] 6 w N N vl C- oo o0 O oD d u � Lr Ir N OJ d y a, d r O M W th M N a0 N v N Q r ..�a b ul c•l ago u v C ^ ^ It al 7 r N W W W r r y O M O cn � co C4 pw O I W O•C r E ro ro O o N � W �:J "o W � W . .-. x u1 O /l l I N 6 7 ro C N s r rn rn rn cc H .7 d U FL W w ra 0 0 cn r r ri o w co 0 H H w O 7 U FQ O OG W £ � H U ro N ,O ro u N N u1 y ro y N N W E y 1 _ ol � ,p N N N rn N1 N NN In W x cn fn 10 Ln 1- 7 to }� N N O d N cq N OD C.J W M N fn N b N •--1 In �7 aD en •rl O en p, 1p .O d O O Il Ncli M O O to O .�.' to O� .--, .--� ,p r ,O N ,O O O �7 o v d N N rn N In Ln dr to ul Cn r.1 of vi n of N N e� N r•� O O N '-I f0 a1 U P+ R. ro E G y u ^a ,M w w � a w + a w a m v eo a cn 7+ a) Cl- b b a) ro •-, 6 W W u •� y C a) •.Ci , k i+ fn H H .O L 0) a) a) F+ p ro Y+ U O U C u CO a) W O ro C a x x U ro W W W F y w ..a C :+ >+ v b H p7 'T H u aJ 'r O O u a) 7 .4 W y r O E 04 W ro u O m b co b y cn u aH-7 U W N 6 O sro+ W e YU+ m > w w PW A oa C aCi G v H od W 7 y O N a] ro H u a �-� W u •.•1 u a/ u pa y p ,b O W b u a) W W C 1 L b ca H Y+ a) w w 0 rn m O m > C C " J u > y a) a) O caw U p� a1 U m C o 7 N U 7 0 a o w d 6 W Ca Cl = w 3 n W a a H U w a U a, � 2 o..a cn wl q , al N U C) b a! N G U 6 W t+ aa) 7 W W co. aw to u •0 o H o o w� m mw: O oa O N {s� G cc G oo to �- ? F H U C W Nu 2 0 W u C) W O cin p C w aoc w N d q 4.7 L 'I-• L Gl aJE J, O ca ? G J H L+ G'•{ c� z v > co ` a dws w .. x �f•. H w r a7 O S 'r n Ln (:D N �D �t Is p Ln c7% r-� N cn w w to O �D y 1 a)-0 �t — d �O q G Gco � zx C7 W O% '4 � o m ccnn O N H H O O O G O rn n cn w O •--� �O to n U W •N O vl MN to cn Ln 'O N O d m cD N V im-• O\ r-� �t O CO N �T O 'D r-i cn cn N N N '� O O O O O O O O O v1 c"1 Ln O O O N o O O O L 14' v1 O OO O CO N O rntoaDOOO �OoClOr+ O n O N .. .. .. .. .. .. ..Ol O� Ln �O v1 v1 O .-4 M Nwl .N-1 (D Ln d d cn '7 1� n cn .� N r Ln MOcl Ln N 1 wl O O O O r+ 'O cn v1 '7 O lO m O` ^ d 1 O c•'1 n cn N Ol U - O O v1 O '4O M �O N OO N M Ln O -.Gi OD G a0 O w vl Ln lO vl w O N t! of G ca N cn O cn O s cn y•� W Wal c) DD N O d vl N a0 Ln Ln VJ ta bo 1-4 W q X N N W H N C iJ Yom+ a H H P w � w H •L J3-+ U A LO+ Q. w W a w W a a H H X cn a a, Jr 3 cn cd a4 p p p W W iw H U ? •^I- a L a cs N ca O w $4 >, — a/ S d O� avi a o .� w VJ N al P •H a! i+ O o! a.i rl OG p. > to N O > VJ a/ a/ •S'. L aO :3 4J C d 1 vJ [n d of vJ cn 51 aJ O co 7+ •� .�+ x O ca on c ca ? u b y OG CL OG L rn i+ O U 4H O U -4JJ PC, �+ •.a •.I L O O W R: W W In U U U O H a s H Ira w a H Oct O W cn U a cn U w W W N 1 1 � N O> .� N cll� � Uy cO t` O a0 m T C-c N cn O4 O O O e� r•1 '•1 N .-1 e-i e-i r-I rl r1 N N N N S ccnn m cn cin cn cn %n cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn en cn ro 00 G ID co O••a w [n H Q r vl .cc O U d TS On O y w G r+ H En ¢ w H `O a o O w w co N y 7 N F W W H � op" v 00 n CL G co ro 7 T H JJ �fl O C b b rn pw N ^J ro C M k U W 5 E H q N z v wa aj o L O w U N Q, O ro C th 6 q a w w y O` wj WL � yN w W cn L C/ .--i 04 Z (n E �n y WO co fes+ G•� J 2 [Fl. W P4 cin, :3 1 d O 00 n 00O E W O � C 7 O^ rn ql C C w n a, n o N N zz • mow �Hq E O F. ILS Cl N O O W Vl O �T O d t•1 W "I rn CO c+l a\ 00 w n 00 O�.. O co N n O N d N O H U v , .0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O a L m O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 N v1 O O Vn O� N 7 O` n N � O W 1 d i'1 �l OO OD c+l C's cn m OOD d m m o H G urn � 0 w v'i � w .p C s c0 c+i Oi oo O 'F.. • Ili ca 4 d N O v m1� ch cts1 N n JA W w b w Q O .0 u d G W w C NL v w Y U N +� y H 44 41 fGi] N O w 6 N w N L1. > d H w C w H o G C X v z a°a s°+ ami S •� ° i i E 7 4 vm a 4 A P. 'fl ro w ro N .ad w w •.Gi O O W H y 'd a N O `.-L •U � N N -0 C p b H W f0 O W U D H C7 N h W» U W F.41 4j W cn cn H O m N m m H O Ln cn u'1 O c•1 M m m O 1 to fel c'�1 rel m cn t+l cel c•1 m �"� cY cn v CS C O•cc N 10 u Cl) v; OH cO V1 •.-1 41 U U b 0 u1 G cn d W I n o ^ M o Ori M M a o 0 C) rn hL U C c0 0 7 N W 0G W y• O O 0 O o. N O� 0 W O b 7 c ca G N ro 07 7 �U W >> i R N O O J 000 U C W F C, N r+ Q Era v ! .G t ca O C]O �N G i 6 A a W w 6 e W z �wtisaw ul t u aDi tr�.t Ems+ v�in u 4 Z F cn r rpO N p•.C+ F vv � �r�y7+; W x �n 0 N M 6 N M d e-i O M O m o. v� o i. F w p m M M O N y iy oo 00 o .o v ti d 7 N M d hZ+� H UW d M -,J, r+ O O O O N rn Ln 4 O M O a w O^ n O d M O T �O O 00 M 10 Ln Mcr1 " .O � ►� � aD oD .7 M � O � .p C17 T 07 C14 0 'O M O O O O O O O O O O O �� O O O O O O O O y 0D O O O v1 O O O O O O O O 'O O O O O O O N 1 O O O ^ v1 O O O O O M O O O O O .-•� V w L ' O O OO r-1 - - .M-1 N T 01 N 'C O M N 0% N M 01 N (� � M O O M %0 T O O N M 1 0 O v1 in N M O O O O O O ^ d co O O v O •.C•1 OD G' ul O .fid Cl O 10 (31O O^^ �O M O M M d O ^. � Ln C> t� �O 00 vl M t� M Lnv g V: 93 O N Mtn .--1 O N 4 Ln N Qti in N MM N �4 N L w G C 00 N O �q aNi O O N m 00 0 Z U u •a.+ •u U G d U G w F Cl- •0 w ,N, m A + a F U U w C `' $4 Vhf 6 00 U 41 C 0 m N m 07 l+ uOi u 000 1 G .Oi 0 H G w F Ra 01 00 d y� x .`1 0 •.-i td 3+ m H 0 u H a O 3 C u co m ?, 'm ' u u w Z C CC a>i m U) vi tQ n c>n w v ¢ �' a a o m w z o e a o co N d w O Z . o. Ln V1 �C t� co O% I� .� N M d ul O% 1 O �D �O �C 'D 'o � 'O 10 1O 10 10 %0 O O aD OD OD m OD O m Cn �D M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C M M M ! 6 ctl rn a I 1C14i u M cn C/] H q cn O O O O ca w rn I N y C ,--t W �a, o o w d W J J Q, H Cl O al O awl CD1 N N � � J r O HH Cl) O W O c! -T CO� U W J ! L ! CNp :3 ctj O O ; cor i H 2 y W.G W L ITJ N U 'O 'O N I 2 O 7 Q WW moo'" W N L W 2 L InC> ! C> 10 mil w ca ral J S p N S G v J 4 H C•� D O IV w W W H N d W ca CO N r r r j4 F N rn O W W v 7 r ra rc c"1 w J aD O W O O .-. rte•+ O O Or- r J O u'1 C7 a rc U W 6 w G r N r4 .4 w U v O .-+ � 14 v1 JIV D 'd O O O J O rn C'1 O c"1 J m m O O CT �p �p Ol r �+'1 t0 O M IV �-+ O O w O y i OO r = w (1 a, u'.. 1 J O1 w N O O N .. .. .. .. 7 O� c0 J r w �--! c•1 N J O� 00 r o+ J CQ _ v1 .--� w O r crl O c0 cll �O J O C+ M O t+1 1 d .--! cn O O O 00 m .o �o o+ r �+'1 �O CD, c'1 �O •Ga OD O CO W r r — cll Cn 11 J M,•.a .••c .cs n J J v of cn 4 10 r rn a 0. v 'O to w H al w w Z py •w Hw W m w u C 4 AC '7L w CO a) > C w Q W C G 6 ww q aJ a) O O w C > 'a •'c O w w Wp� L ". H w •.1 w PG H H •N a/ w O K. al ca L aJ al aJ 00 PG W w L w C d w'ca .0 a) ca w F w > C O d U a U 7 •o H 0 w a! W w O 4 H H 6 F U C a! al U .-+ F Q C W w C a y U W 41 O q .0 .•� al . O aa W C A w ar OL H H H u 0 ca ca W O F 6 Ca W >, a/ a a! 2 ' F a a o w w U pq w H H N u tG H •u P6G .--c N m S Ln q C 3 F ca 7 .0 •- a) U p O O O O O Z a! W +� O O 4! ca x O. O J J J J J O U w w a U W = w N J w � lI to � " [A H E -- p O co C4•.I m vii d W� N D O� 3 C 11 En W a �I C: b P+ CUW f a.) y 0.O � H O P4 •O • CL G �U W L N 7 b I Nr-' 7 O 0 o rn U 04 CU1-4 F w m o O ' Wtj p O ca C i d p W W 4 w z cn i u LI 4 . o � r4) a Gi F 0 > H Ep W 4 w ' N W F ro r-+ M M r1 d •'--E d M D, M 6 M H O O d N N i0 �D t 44 G) 'L] G G O d D% M N w O %O Lm w W 'J' O% En O M 2 x owl M d H F •0 aD D o� aM En + a. o c. 'I. rn d rn O O G to .'•E M M .--E It �7 M m .• U W p 0 O CO d N N d w W d\ N 6 4! G O -t D\ M N CO O %D En U v 0 d o+ En O cn `D M co r+ d O O O Vl d` M u1 co M r+ d O O 'D 11 v1 r �D r En r O r u'1 M r o0 L w •-+ N O N v1 � cl CO cl r-E lD O f1) r I tV N N m N Q\ r r d M M O r r N M v N N O r r r d ET •Q W O O N w'1 M Dto � 6i�•-) ry N �t to 1 01 �'1 �D M •--) O .•� .--E u1 ✓1 DD E+1 O � � O O O � Ln m O .D N M efl O ✓1 D� r Vl to r 00 •rEQO G fV N P OO N �t �1 w ^. N O O w N N N w M ••Gi r-1 W M' r O r-E E/1 O •"E N Q\ N N r r r zr C) ro �p .-^E .-E O N �D r '+ D\ W � •'-E N t w co r N .--E '••E r4 v N M G w m o o c H 1a u) d •.-E H C p7� U ,. V N U L H G I4 od m o G � m 3 oU U •9 H -Gi cn N u to u � G ro U y u 13 -4 w .-) u •.Gi .a d A o N X y ti W ... v •A U G U Co CO -4 G H H U H H COPG H to m b •O •.i 10 -4 w ." .1 Go T 4) In C) W F O H .o U ao ccT a.) G .� G 3 b •� H :+ ro P. H w W a v) M w (D lu y Cn W £ w P. a U Cd QF a) P4 N M N N N .--1 r-1 •rd W • • CL W .--E '-t rd r-1 r-E N N M M tet• �D 'o U O E a a � s rl [7 L �0 t7 OI N T 1� T O .0 u u o� a H C O Cn to v r-1 {+ V G � N U O v; N y .--1 •--� O Ia w p b T -ra ca 0 G N ('1 O co y G -n O N O 00 [a-+� V C4 W T op rn O y, C4cla p O N V O O N N O C1 �AD3 •CG W r-1 .-i L !YI a a w r Tp H cn eO X 1 zo z7 - ..p' c 7 C o N �e H ami a w rn Ln � N H 1.44, I 6-4 H 'd -co _ Ln In .o s o O T N 01 r` OG T w w t` O O O^ V P� V v N - L OD OC N n r r` N d •d C9 N N O T I • 1 a '1 N O v oo n o .ca OD C mN O co O W d G of O� t w � `� C� � S.. a t r` In O cT a L y a a RO'. C W 0 X �' N co W d F: ? X pq C7 N P. W p q b W f-� P.W '.L Y C O C a ..V•1 A W a 'L W a �' N G W C: 4' 4jW Cn 8 6 - W O uv w w a ,� e ! arc as s+ °�' .4J 4) o c sem+ > a H w O H A A A E. H U O - O j qj 6 m 0 C O•H L m in i+ Q N m .+ m U O)b O1 m G n m 7 O 6 W w 3 C v � cn W x o H U C co Ol 7 a x •_ u • co o o sa o p. O co G O m :n W z Q u r 7: a N a O Z o o C Yo x uW W N W v z c �` ov a = 1+ 06 W W L L J Q) O w N X H : S F En N O C1 Z Z + d OD a.7 W ice+ C•.ai rn � S O/ d w ✓1 H •t1 > cO r 2 N V E r Cn N i ._] rn Ln rn OD Ol r O 'D F Mo' r O r O m C-4 (71F_ a d•O cn .O c+1 r U W N 7 N c•'1 ul .-� r d U W •O d C T Ol u'f rncp U'1 r a, cn �O r 01 r O .O am r o r .+ o rn rn N N 0% ^ al 0 cn .c cn rn r rn ul cn O .f'. N N cn .--1 Ln U v N N N SC m Qj m L 3+ pC N L �+ cu U H I En W ai m y cn .0 w ...1 3+ U 1wcC-I F {•' U V cn a a H wm Go m U O k O A O •'� O T +� m d N Z >> cO •c U a C N d .a .0 w X a1 > F cn a w 1 w Co W m •• •6 Xm y m > C7 W O1 7 W 'n 1 a� N C. O! l+ w •.+ H c a .4 > 1 a .n m L a H W a W W a x v v w I a s •.. •.+ w a 'o a m a m m m > •o u w' a a y O a a v T .ts F alw .a wx m u H v a o a s cn ti it m O7m m H N H T — N to T T T to a d OI C. to u O• H O O! H O N L .-4 H W L L +! N Z b P m C1. > cn d O > h d d , 0 O " a C7 O " C a a N W OD .••i N w O >+ x •.+ > >+ x A $ m O o0 w N 7 u C b :37 7 L U m a ••+ C K 1. O U ...i M O U •.� +� O L •.•1 •� +� O O v L W O O O +� H 7 .-4 a ++ V3 eo W �.3 H M a a H W O 4 cn U a In U x W N W U U U0 a RI w PQ O ta H 1 I 1 N 1 1 1 N N O\ e••1 N fn �7 c/1 lO OD m m r 4 N M m .-+ N cn m O O O O O .4 .••I N .--1 -I .--i .-4 .-1 N N N N O m cn cn M R7 O to cn to M C•1 cn M In cn cn to en cn cn cn to t•'1 to cn to cn Q4 cn cn [n a 1 G vl 0 4+ N ql M . N a 0N 00 d y O w rn R.'0) 7 H rn O M O C/3 W W 00 W 10O O O P+ W ti LJ•n O O O H o o Pa •�ts. In 00 O .•F.U T 00 L G cn b M 7 CO A U M O OG m N Z a, d rn � n W N 37 H U xN L d sCd yj C cn F u� 7 q •a D m y ca w a � w �a d [+ O Tr H Co 00 N • N n,07y/ G G M .O .. W W•�. c.7 W M H E-� JW y O .-+ rn �O 'n co N S �D 0, �/1 O .--� O O O O 'T G 00 W 1� N O� Ln N t� V1 u'1 CO d O M O d M N M N •rd C!e-i Il �D v I� �--1 M d w 00 c �!1 N �D w �7 00 w F3 C N .•a O Q•�'i O M .-d M M Ln U v Gn y 1-4 a qq W 6 H w w L W J.1 G7 U b O) Pa •'' G .Ci u L 0ZW4 .`G G o w W m d w•8 W U H -.Oi •w -.Oi •i O yCy d OHD C W I L tp •.-I H C7 W ty O 0 U J-� U •.-1 U U L N O U ul IV w .G+ O H xN G a W y w" d p 6 IU+ a P C s+ s+ o •.� d O 00 W 2 W F :3b .-+ ti �-+ ti y 6 d coi ii w 3 q W C W P4 H '� .C+ o H Cw7 w s+ W -4 -4 d 01 m H m H O O N u b ?, O) O --A u o d .'� b •0 •.+ a! W ¢i r+ a+ .w .S v u 3 cd W u b .— w 0) u +' d p a C 3 3 3 p oo m f+ - .G aJ O C d c0 '0 P. U3 G L x C n O N N Cl 7 = T c0 of u M U N O U W N N N N W Pa U w P. P+ O W 5 r+ N d I I —4 N0%In I M M 14 14 N M d N N Ln �o n 00 01 O M O M M 'O cn M M M M M M M M M M M In mi. M M v b C p•., N L � M cn 1 Q -4 O W N C) O!b N N G N G• N O to to W x -92 ' 1+ U G waw ' c • to 0 o H H W O O - CL G N M 7 n T O G d b W 7 N G i V 94 W � X N m � a o. d N n tU N C H o O O 0Ea K W Z u O ij H I O J yO S O cc x a s W H rJ M l O N � A a7 7 G.- En W w ►+ G•.� rn I E 1N � 2 W P'.. �/�' N [A O ZS •••� •-• O N O tT O tf1 M v M cl ^. ,J W ry 7 ID H N N -El I C7 W .-4 4 •o _ H O N O+ O %D O M G T �4 O N O am C> vrni N C3 tU O N N I to to N3 p pP� H H 4 w G to C y H A ca W E•.•� U yL•� w H C IO+ N W N iti( .> a) o G N ad W cn m a- Ll O! •0 N O O N G H W p w H H •.4 ••G-1 d pq m O H N H .Ui w o w K. d a) @ bo P4 w N L ~ L M OD CI N 'J 4 H O > co O d Wu 03 1+ O d N low 0 .moi v .~+ y ro U u O O ++ tb 4L H .a a s O to to U P. W C7 U' O Z A O to 1 1 O C~O w w m O O rn o+ O O S S S S CO M t'I M c" M M cn M M S u e �+ H G p..-1 aJ m U H A O� O\ � O O •ei N On m 7 N N d W v � tno p W W x v 0. L •n O H O ow b: [n F T [Z--7 p O z x � N Z S 6 rn b b Nya m C G] y O =1 Z O > u W dI m x H W w m L O y F O 4 [� 14 IV tHil O W uU3 wh Q ci 'n cn n O� (1 O CO N N N N F m D\ � w �p .o w S. N �. a N S 0 0 G G O N .-+ rn �•.+ r+ a, rn N Q N d u1 [+1 3 C'1 O 0 0 N N O NI w rn m w a, C) g •ri S lc �p w % d N T .--cn 1� 4 .-•� O� O� 1� W CO O O N r+ G% .•-� �--� .+ N �fl U " + y L C U W M 0 bD o v m 3 O H L W u v� p] H � m L m Q) -. -1 s+ a.i W U Op! x •'I Q ar o u N �+ H H p6UU'. •� 'aC -p. T • ? •XGm� OT 6+Ti UH0 .0C •C-1 aI Hv um ww' H m Pwr W•o4 C: Ca al au a! F ox x W >3 Gp7UO ..b u ar .mmmo LUTG paw� CD •LuoUm AN -a N COVp mG > a/ r+ W M FL W $. -i--. N m L N N dl �7 vl rl N rl N � O � •� W W �•r .--4 r4 �4 N N N M til -Zr-? 'p %D U O to 13 r- y0 N lA W M A H C7, C) a, O� N I •.-� N N � i� O P m 7 .p a, Nco cn y' W N N x d 7 10 a% N 01 b 0n W O O I O 0p N N N t/1 w z w y � r1 r� M cn O O O 1 H Op w C"'.d Ln 0 G G N cd .7 :n H T 00 00 00 M o0 Ca G•b •0 00 m O W 0 0 7 N N N a. U x W O N C6 Lr, 1 O Q Z rn OD Clt O W �.0 -V .O N N w W w O 7 M .M-i n Z A O ru O q �H WI F W �sZ7 Inbo 0, d H •C 7 07 In Ln In .~+ r.0 w a ai N H O N n M � a w b U W 0 W N O N O V1 Vl H M rC, O N N n d IV P 6 C O .T-.O N N N n .d F� 7 v w a v w ca w m m N- W A N y d .-1 G1 b T U H CIV lu W w •N i1 W H ty 7 G H m b b G y G C7 5 u ►, O w a � '� w '€+ x W ►-4 mw O T W d �+ +� �+ A w wlu z m w Da� W W cc l+ m O L u7 7. � H W C v O F U f MEMORANDUM December 10, 1982 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Bus Stop Deli on December 6 , 1982, the City Council tentatively approved a liquor license for the Bus Stop Deli. The Planning Staff had reviewed this application and found the M-4 zoning allows a restaurant use for up to 10% of the total area of an Industrial Park. The Planning Staff confirmed with Koll Business Center that Bus Stop Deli utilizes less than 10% of the Koll Business Center. Based on that information the Planning Staff initialed the OLCC application for conformance to city zoning regulations . The Mayor has signed the OLCC application and the applicant has submitted the application to OLCC. r� f.. M E M O R A N D U M i TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR nn DATE: DECEMBER 9 , 1982 SUBJECT: MACC/CABLE TV UPDATE z i The Storer Metro company had a meeting last month in Tigard 4 with the Area Chambers of Commerce. At that meeting the broad outline of Cable TV progress was discussed. It was referenced that the system would not be totally complete until May of 1984 , which is the two-year deadline from the start of construction 7 perscribed in - the franchise contract. Tigard, however, will still be substantially complete well ahead of that contractual deadline. The following is a summary of the progress to date and the key components towards system completion: i The head end sudios must be connected and completed before any signals can be transmitted over the system. The main i Cornell Road head end is scheduled for completion in December, 7 although delays in cable stringing on the TV Highway through Beaverton have slowed the connection process . The Beaverton head end is to be completed in January. The Tigard head end i will be completed in December, but would need to be connected to the Cornell or Beaverton head ends before it could be activated. This should occur in February. The Tigard head end, serving our area , will then be ready for transmission in March of 1983. The actual installation of coaxial cable occurs in two fashions , either overhead or underground. Overhead wire is strung from a cable strand of which 32 miles are now up in Tigard, or s three-quarters of the strand for our City. The coaxial cable is then wound around and supported from the strand and this occurs quite quickly after the strand has been hung. Undergrounc- ing proceeds a little more slowly and is now proceeding in Summerfield. Summerfield should be completely undergrounded from mid-December through February. From Summerfield they will move into Picks Landing and out along Hall Boulevard. These areas (Summerfield, Picks and along Hall Blvd. ) should be energized and receiving service in March. From these areas along the Durham/Hall Blvd. access , they will proceed from south to the north end of the City. From Hall they will move out Greenburg and Tigard Streets over the course of this Spring and Summer. . . . Continued . . . MIMMI lie MINI- MEMO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9 , 1982 PAGE TWO From Durham they will move from south to north over the course of the Summer. By June of 1983 , Storer expects to have over 50% of the City available for cable service and the entire City served well before the June 1984 deadline. Storer feels that the successful marketing of the cable TV franchise requires personal door-to-door type contact. In a strict interpretation of our door-to-door solicitation Green River ordinance, this is prohibited. I will be proposing an amendment to the Green River portion, of the Code to the Council which would exempt area representatives of franchised or regulated utilities . In this manner we can explain the available new service and expand the public use of this franchised utility. RWJ : dkr L! 11/30/82 I L( / PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL PROGRAM BUDGET Community Services Police 19267.35 Finance & Records 4579.02 Municipal Court 264.59 Library 4264.55 Social Services 734.94 Total Community Services 29110.45 Community Development Public Works 39439.94 Planning & Development 3520.15 Total Community Development 42960.09 Policy & Administration Mayor & Council 884.71 Administration 1731.31 Total Policy & Administration 2616.02 City Wide Support Functions Non-departmental 26177.96 Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 39784.49 Investments DEBT SERVICE Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses 146596.27 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Contract 1t TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 287245.28 ES 1 x 7 Ll WATER STUDY COMMITTEE MINUTES � AUGUST 31 , 1982 1. All six members were present. The seventh member appointed at the last meeting was not present. Bob Santee , the ad- ministrator for the Tigard Water District was the guest. E E 2 . Members that attended the tour of Lake Oswego's treatment plant gave their reports . The purpose of the tour was to get members of the committee familiar with the water plant. e S 3. Bob Santee gave his presentation to the committee with the use of another report, a map and a graph based on historical data . Some questions asked of Mr_ Santee were: A. Explain the difference between "average" and "peak" demand . B. Is there or is there not an adequate water supply? . I The committee discussed all aspects of Mr. Santee' s report f and individual members gave their comments. 4 . It was decided by the committee that Duane Lee, a consultant for the city should be invited to answer some questions . He will be asked to attend the next meeting on Monday, t September 13th. The alternative date was set for Tuesday, September 21st. Bruce will call all committee members to let them know which date has been chosen by Mr . Lee . 5. In preparation for the next meeting it was determined that the committee find out whether Mr . Santee has heard fox from the Eugene or Springfield water plants . f I t k I i r `s { i i. 'i • 3 !, JOINT WATER STUDY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 13, 1982 1. All members were present. Minutes from the committees last meeting will be approved at the meeting next week . 2. Introduction of Duane Lee . The committee explained what their purpose was and what they hoped to accomplish. Some questions asked of Mr. Lee were: A. What is Tigard ' s supply options? B. Have you projected the population to go along with the estimate of Tigard' s need for water? (Urban Growth Survey) C. What do you feel are Tigard ' s options that are real and attainable? D. What is your opinion about entering into a con- tractoral agreement and still keeping links with our neighbors in case of emergency etc? E. What mistakes do you think that Beaverton made in negotiating their contract? F. How urgent do you feel the problem really is? After Mr . Lee left the committee went over what had been said . 3. Bruce brought a copy of the Eugene code sent to him by Mr . Santee . He also had an agenda for the Water District meeting on September 14th . The review of the Eugene code and the CH2M Hill Study will be done at the next meeting. 4 . The seventh member was brought up to dat on meetings missed and he will receive copies of minutes and agendas from those meetings . 5. Mr . Pirkle will be attending the Metzger Water District meeting and asked if there was any suggestions or questions he could bring up at the meeting? 6. The committee was reminded that they were asked to conclude their sessions by December lst. 7 . The impact of Proposition 13 was discussed briefly . f 8. The next meeting is set for Tuesday, September 21st. If there are any changes members will be notified . now Jui,it '..,citr-r "ALIUY Coi,cAttee irmaites -ict ;L)sciA , Jii.: t Litiier vivre present , anc; Lier -Aings of Pu-ust i Lj t L;s I r u i e .")f I i c fru, t.m City at this coi-xiii ttees request. t i :J- C S U L'S L'(j :re : ;.110 CASe gets CIC'0,46Gs River Ler. ,could L,J . coiiskJer shared options . t-IOW tLlhdiil� for constructicti ''culd be done. Status of currcnt trecitr,,ent plant , rias the v.Aicle arecs �;rov,ti ue�i, considered. 11"co-'sibility of Cladkari-las River source to toe year i0JO, Status Of Wf i l l i GMC!tte ;river ri(i,its . Uthtr optioiis. 4, F.'k-- viu-i-i of Vie Eugeiie ",,'uterand Pourer cgreeii,E',rits , D L,i -,cussion of Ballot r.;eosure i'5. 0 . u.-Pocts U. utticr irless : c. 'Water would like to meet with Wis co[:-j,-iiittE:e. 'i 7. i,*-cuting Ser)tei-liber 198"'2 at 7:3)0 FJIS RCSPeCtfLI11Y SUDI'Itted) dancie Stir.,-,ler Sect. Fro-ter: JOINT WATER STUDY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28 , 1982 1 . All members were present. Minutes from previous two meetings were submitted and approved. 2 . Introduction of Bill Ross, chairman of Metzger Water Board and Jessie Lowman, manager of Metzger Water District. After an explanation of this committee' s charge and it' s status was given cormA ttee members asked the following questions . A. Would our arrangement of strengthening our Lake Oswego source and using Portland as a back-up have any effect on the Metzger Water District? B. If the city Of Tigard took over the water district and part of the Metzger Water District what effect do you feel that would have? C. Are there any agreements for back-up with TWD and Metzger Water Districts? i D. Why is Metzger contracted to Portland rather than other options? E. Please explain what the Water Management Advisory Board is and it' s function. F. What powers does the Advisory Board have? 3 G. What was Metzger' s reason for not going with Willamette? H. Could Tigard hook into the existing pipeline? I . What do you feel are Tigard' s attainable options? J_ How does the Metzger Water District project how much water they will need for one year?' 3. Members of the committee were asked to review their notes and minutes from past meetings and prepare a summation to discuss at the next meeting. Also, the committee plans to begin dis- cussing the question of dollars at the next meeting. 4 . Th next meeting is scheduled for October 7 , 1982 unless other- wise notified. Bob Jean, attorney, will be invited to attend. i t JOINT WATER STUDY COMMITTEE MINUTES OCTOBER 13 , 1982 1 . Two members of the committee were not present. Minutes were approved after change on item D was made. 2 . Frank Curry, public works director for the city of Tigard , was not able to attend this meeting but will be at our next meeting on Thursday, October 21 , 1982 . 3. Meeting adjourned at 8 : 35 . v�.i l..i v._•i Lt� .�'i U L Y livi.i..l'1''1'LL' „..�1•+U'1 L'..� uc-ober Ll , 1982 1 . ()ne Member o1 the committee was not present . Minutes w-re looked over -=na approveu . ''. I.trocuctson o: Prank Curry. public works director for the city of Tig°'-d . The purpose of asking Mr. Curry to this meeting -as to aiscuss the po--sibility of the -dater Di .-trict anti zh City working g toy•F ther. :.;ome aues�ions :asked of ivir.. Curry =:ere : i � ou invc lven in Tigard city =ffairs ,:Tien the city and he District u re having problems? f ;':hy can the ciiu- use the Y,atAr District ' s enuipment but the ,a.ter lAsi,rict cannot u- the city ' s e :,iipmenC2 you urgani:,�e co-working with the other citi-G? 4 t L. ."Oulu .nyttiirig precluae 'Tigard. Giiater District from jojnint_s the co—nerative effort? tp-e TiF;arri -dater District ^ontacto(l when this group -,as formed? F. is Tigard still uoing builaing rmlts for King City"? G. ii n ;yc.0 get a -ound out-motets equipment (old new etc. ) H. ;tvho pays for equ i nment damages? I. Vjh=4' -avant- ges are there for tht lig:.ra District in � this co-operative? J . Ho,• m ny truckG are there? ! r K. ;,or_Ld you like to see Tigard join th. -o-operative? t L. Can anyone run the - ,.uipment? ivy. Hov: would the Water District go about joining the co--perative? � .N . Hov. ao you and th- Water Dietrict staff get along? U . Do you have men in your I. oartment that could i'un the Yater Distric t? i . ;;nen is it time uo replace water line--? d,nc, proviae-, .,,our comp,.iter software? R. Do you Knov: if' there is any co-operative effort in Eugene? S. If the City ^na the Water District merged could they also hanale the other citties Tigard now services? m . How long roula it tike to offset costs incurrea if the Tigard 1 i Q S IN t n�� rY:et�gc r V,r,t r Districts merged'? Mould it be �ount�rproauctive? U . 4hat is the ne,,L best thing if th4s committee Decides against a mere r? V . If the nerge:r wasn' t agreeabl- and comfortable v.itti tt:e majority of the people what woula you su gF,;est as our next avenue? ' The committee aecideu it was time to stat uealir:g with the ;,uestions _i- en Lhis co�.,r.,ittee to answer. Brl:-.o :-uggested that it vias imoor- € tanc that ( -ch member individually discuss their own personal opinions k as :i-me was running out . Discussion included Lake Usw go as a viable source , v:atPr lroi:, Clackamas as -pposed to ., 0 7 amette and co-operative t 4 . To o7•epbre for the next -eeting okay was ask-d to fines out when newt t tavisor.y Bo^t.0 meeting is . l+na Bruc ill --peak to City Council on r)ehali of crii. committee. Y 5. Next m-eLinb is 'd,ednesday , October 27, F 4 t E f f f i t i i i i i I s t r i a 's C t 1 l JU11N i Nc li'1'L'll �.:'1U11Y l.U;:;,a.1�l�lL�L 1A1iYU'1 Cctuber 27, 1 . 1:11 .,jc-rLc-L-s pre- enL . I:lir oLes z=j:proven after amenuinG leLberz D There w=:s no preprrco s,genda for this evening th-s, ins group anu inciiviclual summE1tions . Unless an f>u,er; rr ,cy Ineeting is c.z,llea the^huvi'ory Boaru clue.:. riot Ince is 1Or F��if?rGXlt?c� GEl;y MOVe weeks . ] . r�fLe rn i2. uepLh uiscu.-Sion by committee members it v1t:s de- cic3eu �o pc�Lpvrie the rexl, mueuing until the CH�Ivi Hill ;tuuy is redo, 4 . `1'ne nexi, coo--Iii;lLLr'.e meeting; io scheuuled for 'v'.eune uay , I,ovembex. i t I s i I 1 f I !tt t t� t I f�f t t: t��v1,,.:Litt icy , 1982 v;(_�re pre-senL ::na minutes were .:pprovecl . '__!': L•K ve,, urteu thi: L tie zi_ pearc:d bel ore Lne `l'ip;z,ru City C;c)uIIc 1,_L I. ue:.tint; zin ex Ler;,;IUn. In the inLer•im the Tigzaru :3er:L :i leLc,ev LO the City Council z:skin[r them exLensior_ becz_,use it might hir:der relations ceLv.een iif_,z,ra anu the city of Portlana. A recision will be :_:�cc zit Lne City Council ' s next meeting. � . ijave i3 z:;cer from the TjgLI-L-cl, 1j:imes was expectea to sit in on Lfle but never �. vriveu . 4 . Uri, i,: Hili 6tuuy i:.; not ready yet and it was I:iovec by kz:y Pirkle toe_r::vke no recommenuativns or aeterminations until the com- mittee members have a chance to go over the study . Jim Hen- aerson Aas askeu to touch base w1th the company preparing the s Luay bna task them if they coula sL eea things up a bit . •ten Borgesen gave a report on his visits to both tae o.ater Listrict :.nu city of 'Tigard offices . C r. (,cLcuer L�-)tri ;;ordon anu a very knowledgeable frienu stuciea tntm; office pr•oceaures anu equipment at both locItitiors . Everyc,ne .:,;s very cooperative . The 'r;ater District has one office manager 4 zinc or;(-, ,,uokkeeper/c:omputer billing clerk. Doth gentlemenX felt operzaLior: herew. was v(-,;r.y efficteent . The gommzjtee computer ri...s Lne cr:c>z ciLy for uouble what it has know . v;hoever the aLer lii.sLricL, purchUseci the !omputer from furnishtnem with ()L-ugr'_tms that bre very accesible . Bot:1 trenLlemen eft. tnzat was a great plus . They feed the com;niter will last far. bOr�.,eSer! ' s only sugp,,estion for the 'vvatel. iiistric t VtaS thUt Lhe3, mould cbncel their maintenance contrz,ct . rie sugeesLed looxing, ir.• Lu "self-insurance" . The city of Tigard nas a Viang computer. Tiley have rIe person full time aoing sewer bi�lings. mr. Borgesen felt that the �:aLei• LisLrict could handle the sewer billings but wouia have to auu versonnel . He also felt that Tigard shoulu also look iriLcl :core easily attainec programs - right now they ueai with Canbca which megns its more cestly .. iar. -Borgesen maue these recoii,menciations to the committee: 1 . .,t this time it is not .feasible for the �Yate:r District Manu the city of `i'igara to merge . � . The city should consiaer sewer billings on tax statements z.:t the enu of the year. � . Tiie Viater District ana the city of Tig,,,rc coula mkke joint purchases on supplies ana equipment to reauce asts. v. Jir„ Cjer.aerson reportea that the Viater District, , at their last r tieLin:. , movc.0 to file; v lav suit , 1 . ) to clarify terminal (late ziriu c: . ) must Poral,%na negotiate in gooa faith Gnu have they not t,eer. meting in gc,od faith Loviard the Tigara e«ter Listrict . f of iici-ala not to aiscU=;;; thiJ si,,uation in itri L.ne pz'C :is Iv.otion _pa sseu . Z . 1.:otior. Inrc:e uo ask Tigaru City Louncil to allov: Ivancie ,,timler c Lt.;-,�:ir: car; Lrliis culnraitt� e even if her term on Lhc Git.y Gouncil ' tv:UGiUrI pZJ:'';W; . y . 15i•uce C;laz•k s;-Iic; tic v,uulu call the committee memuers to give them une curie anu Ua to of the next meeting. 11L0 vU VL 141 L . wlm WATER STUDY COMMITTEE MINUTES DECEMBER 1 , 1982 1 . Jim Henderson and Clarence Nicoli were not able to attend this meeting. All other committee members were present. The minutes were approved after some corrections were made . 2 . Introduction of victor Bringle from Carter Bringle & Associates , consulting engineers . Some questions asked of him were: 1 . How many districts, that your company is now servicing, gets water from the Clackamas River? 2 . Do you think that Lake Oswego would want Tigard to- foot the bill for expansion? 3 . Has there been a contract signed with Lake Oswego yet? 4 . Do you feel that Tigard is not being charged enough for water by Lake -Oswego? 5 . What you recommend to this committee? 6 . Is anyone below Albany taking from the Willamette? 7 . Do you feel that there should becm,iltipl Pources of water? 3. The committee then discussed individual�,. nterpretations of the ques- tions given to this committee to answernU There was a motion made asking that each committee member go hone and answer each question individually. The motion was passed and the answers will be dis- cussed at the next meeting. 4. Ray Pirkle contacted the engineers involved. with the CH2M .Hill Study. They said that it should be ready by December 9th but would not give any clues to their findings . 5. Other motions passed at this meeting' were: �Budq Clar a 11a r it n the aren ameet' g Mon nigh ` Find out if Water District maintains their own equipment. 2, 1. Bruce Clark will ask Mr. Santee for a list of things that he feels that the city and the Water District could do in a cooperative effort: 3, Bruce Clark will ask Jim Henderson for a copy of the list given him by Frank Curry. This committee will make sure that it' s findings will be € published in the local newspaper in laymens terms so that the citizens of Tigard can understand its recommendations. These findings will be presented to the Water District and the city of Tigard in the form of a joint meeting. 6 . The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 8th at 7 : 30 . MEETING ADJOURNED. i ARB MEMORANDUM �J TO: Members of the City Council FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning & Development DATE: December 10 , 1982 RE: Comprehensive Plan Elements The Planning Commission has recommended that three elements of the proposed Comprehensive Plan be reviewed and adopted by the City Council. Following is a list of the elements and the dates when these elements were approved. CPA 6-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: ENERGY - November 23, 1982 CPA 7-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: AIR, WATER & LAND RESOURCES l QUALITY - December 7 , 1982 CPA 8-82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT: ECONOMY _ December 9, 1982 e> 4-1 N , r-{ w N r-i -ice C` O U] O\ � 4A O•r-1 �4 O NO � 1 r-1 E-4 I N PL �4 4-1 Cd ?a cd 4D i1 hp IEE I f r � s �1 �-F d ! I 1,3 Mrs. Paul E.Joinsor. 53000 Stiv Hill S[rzei Tigard,Oregon 97223 • �"�s September 7 , 1982 _. RECEIVED E7 ' i✓f� ~ �; 1982 Mr. Jeremy Coursolle CITY OF Tigard Planning Staff IfGq�p City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon, 97223 • Dear Mr. Coursolle , This letter is about a proposal to change 17. 88 acres of land ajacent Omara Street from 42 housing units per acre to 12 units per acre . Seventeen times twelve is 204 units . There is only about seven to ten acres out of the 17. 88 acres that can be built upon because of the Flood Plain. Instead of 12 units per acre there would be 20 to 29 units per acre . This would cause a tremendous impact on the character of the surrounding low density single family neighborhood. How would you feel if you bought a home in a single family residential area with the land around you zoned single family. We bought our home in this single family area because we were assured that this area would stay low density, not changed to high density apartments. Please consider all of the citizens of this single family residential neighborhood who would be deceived. These people purchased their homes in this area with the understannding that this neighborhood would stay low density single family. Also, consider the impact and shock to all these people with an increase of crime, noise pollution and heavy traffic volume which would exceed the 1500 cars per day limit for a local residential street. This would ruin the character of this single family neighborhood. The N.P. O. #1 book, page 5, says that apartments in Tigard out number the houses. On page 11, it says that future develop- ment sould be sensitive to the concern of the citizens. Page 16, policy #6, says the single family character of the area designated on the plan map as urban low density residential is viewed as a positive asset to be retained. On page 21, policy 16, avoid locating apartments where access can be gained only from local residential streets . In closing, please consider us, the citizens of Tigard, who bought with the understanding that we would be in a single family residential area because it was zoned that way. Please do not change the character of this single family neighborhood. Please put yourself in our position as we are the ones who would suffer if it were changed to high density. Please leave our area single family residential so as to retain the character of the neighborhood. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ��. C. R. (Larry) Saub { `• Lucy A. Saab z.• 13230 SW Burnham. Ct. Tigard , Oregon 97223 �,30Iw September 10 , 1982 Planning Staff, Planning Commission and the City Council City of Tigard , Oregon Attention: Mr. Jeremy Coursolle Gentlemen : As you know, the principal topic of discussion at the NPO #1`1 meet- ing held at Tigard City Hall on September 1 , 1982 was your Planning Staff's proposal to change the Zonina classification of a tract of land abutting the north line of O'Mara Street, Said proposed change to be from the present low density zoning of Single Family residences to that of medium density Multi-Family units. It is our understanding that this ownership comprises 17 .88 acres and , if zoned for medium density residential, would qualify for 214 dwell- inm units ; even though compressed into a "buildable area" totaling but 7 to 10 acres of the entire ownership. A change in zoning classi- fication to medium density Multi-Family units would be counter to and incompatible with Neighborhood Plan One, Policy 6 , viz : "The single family character of the area designated on the plan map as urban low density residential is viewed as a positive asset to be retained. Proj- ects proposed for this area must be judged according to effects upon this character." . It would also be counter to Policy 16 which reads "Avoid locating apartments where access can be gained only from local residential streets.". Unfortunately, we are already burdened with this latter situation in the form of the 36-unit 2-story Philadelphia Square Apartments located on Ash Avenue and Hill Street. ` The owner of the subject 17.88-acre tract has not suffered a hardship for lack of development inasmuch as this land is on the tax roll as pasture land and has been utilized as such in recent years . Nor, has the owner been deprived of developing it as low density single family residences in keeping with the existing zoning classification as shown on the plan map dated May 1974. Land on the opposite side of O'Mara Street was so developed five years ago. The undersigned are abutting property owners to the subject 17.88- acre tract. We bought our home in good faith and reliance on Neigh- borhood Plan One and its attendant policies. - l - C. R. & Lucy A. Saub Letter 09-10-82 (Page 2) It would be unjust and a disservice to the other property owners in this area, especially to the abutting owners , not to retain the pres- ent low density zoning of Single Family residences for subject 17 .88- acre ownership. To permit development of medium density Multi-Family units on subject tract would depress the market value of the adjacent properties and deprive the owners thereof of the ammenities attendant to a low density zoning of Single Family residences that they have a right to expect. We feel that the City of Tigard should not penalize adjacent landowners by making a zoning concession for a given landowner as a means of ac- quiring land for the "C-1,eenway". We agree with Mayor Bishop's remarks appearing in the September 8 ,1982. , edition of the paper "This Week" to the effect that it is important that Tigard grow up nicely and that a good family environment be kept ; alsq, that there's been very high population growth pressure that has to be kept in check. We note that the Tigard Planning Commission earlier this month responded favorably to the objections voiced by NPO #6 to a zoning change on a 4-acre tract , proposed by the Robert Randall Company, and retained the low density R-7 zoning instead of going to a higher density R-5. We urge that you retain the R-7 low density zoning classification of Single Family residences for subject 17.88-acre ownership in keeping with Policy 6 of the Neighborhood Plan One map dated May 1974. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, cz, l -rum zz( '1h-13,1 5 e V, --A t R"S E P 441982 CITY OF I IGARD ZPLANNING DEPT. 10 r-T a elZ a-" affffEMMEONWMME"Em�1 c SUBURBAN INVESTORS 11565 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 October 27, 1982 City of Tigard Planning Department 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Sir: As property owners in the city of Tigard, we would like to go on record as requesting that the City of Tigard retain the current zoning of "professional-commercial" for our property as specified below: Map #1S1 35DA Tax Lot # 1400 (2.47Ac. ) Tax Lot # 1800 ( .64 Ac. ) Sincerely, Suburban Investors Woodrow Hughes David Hughe Wil ' a B1 chard S er Denn s Thomas Cg c 1 s • THIS MAP IS FURNISHED AS A CODIVENIENCE IDI LOCATING PROPERTY AND THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO L"ILITY FOR ANY VA DATIONS AS MAY 9E DISCLOSED BY ACTUAL SURVEY �q %mica, Pirst American Title Insurance company of Oregon ! An assu~- business name of TITLE LUSUPANCE COMPANY OG OREGON 4j- 12012 j_12012 S.W. CANYON ROAD, BEAVERTON, OR 97005 - . (503) 641-7000.. i ORDER NO. SUBDIVISION MAP 1 S 5-1 2000 15 J TIS ( F C I M, oo , 1 2801 /.GLS'Ac. N NI 1900 5 200.94 1 f a 3412 3 Ives�w N _ �N00 , c »CCCj 3. S.4a 5327 27 .69' IF$ 2.3 - 68 20 89°30'30'E '62.7 W 3501 .50AC o ' N N X800 Z » --t 0. \ .saac. 19 > ! 25 203.96 1700 120 _ N88°W -T 350023 \ J N SOAc. ® h mir N 1600 �0 MAP o 35 DDo „N 1400 22 J = N 0. 2.47 Ac. o t o xo (n 1500 z 23� 206.68 • � � H88°W —' —' 2 � 300 WL z m Eats 130 c m,° QPOQ e\aF °o�I � T hEZ.: ._ _ _ _300 M/L 23 60 W \� = oN I C.S. 3060 10' ze J _ j c I I y N 8.3 EAST 301.9 1 t w _ W 25 N88°W 209.78 S89011*W 302.1 C 8.3 230.76 FRO M t ZE � ,,2003- 499.0SS SEE MAP IS I 35DD I1 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. - i Z SS - ,a /V vrbz� w� 4_*e �`� j NEW TE(O James Moellman �P 99,275 Mary Ann Banky r� Trustees for Emily Moellman �- 12570 S.W. Brookside 3. Tigard, Oregon 97223 City Of Tigard 2 November 1982 Attn: Jeremy Coursolle Planning Department Ref: Tax Map #2S12BD P.O. Box 23397 Lot # 2200 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Address: 9960 S.W. Walnut St. Y Tigard, Oregon s As owners of the referenced property, we agree with and support the [ City of Tigard Planning Staff proposal that the property be zoned commercial. as shown on your Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map. c f i im Moellman Mary Ann, nky I Nov 15 {082 CI-IY uF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. s t i 7 f � - i .. �r.i�nr"�.L:� , .ate ..!l t'':r' zOn�. G.?:.'�. .. :,�",F' _ . _<�: ..' _, '-i.! . ;i• ? n aLet.te^ a-tec. 1 , . ember •JecQrny "o.j �o. le , has reconsidered the riensat.V o nrOC e t`J . �F t ltes , "The vacant ti}10`h'n asfiediu-, r!enSit,y in the news p per tabloic: ( ?j ovei:soc.r 19?2 edition) . The underl,yin� zonin will be ro :o C-,.-: a ( the exi stin? ^his action decreases the density o � dwellin.- ural is ?;c: ab );at one-half of that ori�-:inally proposed(-:-12 tc -71 buy is stili about rouble rhe present zoning o 4 . 3 • �urther in=crmatio:: can be obtained by coming to the 1 liecerruber 1922 ''?'C ,_ l :% etir:- at Ti,Tarc City `Tall at 7: 301 ,': . A sta` '! representative will be nresent at this meetinq, . =urther information on the new Ti-arc, Comprehensive 1'lar', can be ob+,--ne.ii aTigard City '-'all or the "i ,arc? T ,-bl_i(, L nary . :: neci ric questions can be directed to the Ti:�arr. 1'lann i n,, ata by nhoninr X39-4171 . '•'ublic hearings on the new Cornprehensive Plan will begin at -owler Junior High :school on 7 L'ecember 1922 at 7: 30 , . . A* ]T10 ;�l Chairperson 1 ® �` NAW ARM November 30, 1982 Jeremy Coursolle r, Associate Planner City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon Re: Tax Lot 501 1S13hA Dear Mr. Coursolle: Following our recent brief conference regarding Tigard's Comprehensive Plan, you suggested I write a letter so that my concern with the status of our home be on record. We have our home on Tax lot 502 1S134A and we also own the surrounding Tax lot 501 lSl3hA which is presently in pasture and woods. On part of Tax lot 501 there is a man-made pond which was established for fish and frog culture, and is shown on all aerial maps. The existence of oUr pond has apparently lead to the erroneous assumption that a portion of our lot No. 501 is open space. The bottom of the pond at this time is at the same elevation as the building sites of the adjacent Black Bull and Englewood developments. In fact, almost half the building sites in Phase I of Englewood, directly north of our Tax lot 501 are b6tlt on land of the same elevation as that included in the open space designation on your map as published. Eventual development into building sites is a much better use for this land and we hope you will help us . We are anxious to have the map°s designation of our property changed from open space to the equivalent of S-R so that our right to this land will be unimpaired. Thank you. Sincerely, Joseph T. Hart 10993 S.W. North Dakota Street Tigard, Oregon, 97223 P-C 3 1982 �t CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DOT. I. TIGIRQ CITY LIMITS 1'. t 601 F. ' sot S—R ,4' erx �s S—R pv Cj O aj g 800 R_7 ' k. ��j G ilk { 22 '� I �1 47 ,yr.7-. Coo 9C, , Ai `s 0 1 v4" "RE 1 , d� December 3, 1982 `=C 3 182 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. Jeremy Courselle - Associate Planner P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Reference: Proposed Zoning IL to CL Dear Mr. Courselle: We would like to request that the city of Tigard consider highway commercial zone in lieu of "IL" for the area adjacent to and south of S.W. Pacific Highway. Our property lies presently in the area proposed to be zoned "IL" which is designated on the maps as area 23-81 tax lots 1801 , 2000, 2001 , 2002, and 2100, map is 136 CD. It is our intention to construct a family entertainment center on the above mentioned lots and in order to do this, it requires a C-5 (highway commercial ) zoning, therefore, we respectfully request that a highway commercial zoning be considered for this area. Thank you for considering our request. Very truly yours, Glenn W. Bethune Architect for Invest-A-Venture Y F the Obert nanudua company Kristin Square• 9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. • Suite 300• Portland, Oregon 97219• (503) 2 5-1131 Tele60557 December 3, 1982 pL, Mr. Jeremy Coursole, Associate Planner City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Coursole: pie have reviewed Mr. Bethume's proposal for the property to the east of our property in the Tigard Triangle. We agree with his position that plan designations other than IL should be consid- ered for the area. Specifically we think it is appropriate that a highway commercial designation for a portion of the area with- in the Triangle as well as other designations be seriously considered. Sincerely yours, `John T. Gibbon Secretary/Counsel JTG/tmu C fRiB19R�1e1 C V TO: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF TIGAKU FROM: NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION 05 PLANNING DEPT. RE: COMMERCIAL-NEIGHBORHHOD DESIGNATION AT BONITA ROAD AND HALL BLVD. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1982 Be it recognized that the Neighborhood Planning Organization #5 (NPO #5), organized and acting within the authority of City of Tigard Resolution No. 82-13, dated February 22, 1982 having conducted public meetings in the exercise of our responsibility as an advisory body, representing the citizens, residents and property owners in the area as designated for NPO #5 herein submit a modification to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map. Recent proposed development of the property on the corner of Bonita Road and Hall Blvd. (Exhibit A) has raised an awareness among residents that this property is subject to commercial development . The majority of local response has indicated that such develop- ment would be inappropriate in relationship to the adjacent residential areas. In keeping with the city's policy of protecting the character of existing neighborhoods we would pro- pose that this area be redesignated from its current commercial designation to medium density residential , R-12 zone. The commercial designation of this site was originally one of three planned for NPO #5 as proposed by staff and adopted in the comprehensive plan in 1977. (Exhibit B) The commercial designation for Bonita Rd. and Hall Blvd. as cited in the plan text was for the purpose of serving as a neighborhood shopping center. The plans objective in providing a commercial site at this location were: 1 . "Establish a small limited commercial center in proximity to the residential development that will serve the immediate shopping needs of neighborhood residents." Discussion: Prior comprehensive plans and zoning actions pursued a policy of convenience .shopping pockets" to break up and divert residents from the down- town Tigard area. A number of items would indicate a difference in the current community needs and desires. a.) An extensive Tigard Downtown Revitalization Plan has been proposed for the purpose of enhancing the downtown business community, causing future economic development and support of current business. b.) With the development and growth of the full service shopping centers in downtown Tigard at several locations and the Pacific Highway corridor in general, the residents' shopping needs are adequately met and for most, does not require travel of over two miles. c. ) Further, recent development of late night convenience stores at several ( neighborhood locations already serve to augment the other more traditional shopping centers. (Exhibit C) Asa result of the above cited factors the "shopping needs of the community" are already being adequately served by the existing facilities. COMMERCIAL-NEIGHBORHOOD: Page 2 2. "To encourage pedestrian shopping and minimize vehicular traffic to community shopping centers." Discussion: Again there are several recent factors that would tend to mitigate e current validity of this statement. a. ) The advent of various signalization efforts, new and improved facilities and future street developments will in themselves accentuate the flow of traffic in and out of the downtown area. b. ) The improved service of Tri-Met to the neighborhood area provides an excellent alternative to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic to the downtown area. c. ) The residential development along Hall Blvd. and Bonita Rd. to date has created an increase in foot and bicycle travel. As a result it has be- come apparent to local residents that the existing facilities to accommo- date pedestrian travel is insufficient to deal with the existing flow let alone the potential increase that current commercial development at this site would cause. Although one could argue that such improvement will be made in the future we feel this does not adequately address the concerns of current residents who would be faced with the immediate risks. 3. "To protect adjoining lower intensity uses from the adverse affects of noise, bright signs, vehicular traffic and visual blight that are often associated with commercial development." Discussion: a. ) Stop and go activities associated with certain types of commercial development combined with the potential for late operating hours would not enhance the tranquility and serenity of the surrounding neighbor- hood development. b. ) Commercial development may result in undesirable advertising and facility lighting particularly disturbing to directly adjacent residents. c. ) There is a concern amoung residents that certain types of development would be conducive to gathering or loitering points resulting in an undesirable effect on the surrounding neighborhood. d. ) In addition, residents are concerned that this may introduce the potential of some types of criminal activities that heretofore have not been present in the area. SUMMARY: Where as there is no other commercial development in close proximity but rather significant residential use established in the area raises the questions of compatibility. Some if not most types of commercial development allowed could have a detrimental effect on the neighborhoods identity, integrity, serenity and tranquility. The enviroment sought by most homeowners and residents in a neighborhood could be significantly and adversly affected. We are not opposed to positive economic development programs, however, we are supportive ,f the position taken by many residents of our NPO that this property is an inappropriate site for business activities. There are numerous other locations which can enhance the communitys' future and the service of the citizens without damaging the neighborhoods and the welfare of the residents. Therefore we request that the Planning Commission recommend this site be redesignated from it current commercial use to a residential medium density use of R-12. M - r. R - i LAI r S/111 If ' ■,�: "'a .. =X11► ' � ►.• . areas and major traffic carriers such as Hall Boulevard- B,, On site recreation space as well as pedestrian and bicycle access to parks, schools and convenience shopping. C. The siting of buildings to minimize the visual effects of parking areas and to increase the availability of privacy. POLICY lo. Apartments should be located to produce the lease adverse effects 1,,_^n single family areas. Development criteria should include: A. Buffej,-ing--by means of .landscapi-.g, fencing and distance. B_ Compatibility of design recognizing the conflicts of mass and height between apartment buildings and houses. This plan allocates all urban medium density development to one area; the triangular shaped property between Fanno Creek, Hall Boulevard and Bonita Road. This area contains approximately 74 acres of dzvelopa!:;i=_ land (deducting t-he flood plain area in the Fanno Creek Greenway) and therefore has the potential of containing f ago multi-family dwelling units. This area was selected for multi-farad ly development because of its being adjacent to a major thoroughfare, hall Boulevard, and its adjacency to the Fanno Creek Greenway which will provide open space relief for this medium density residential development. In addition, the placement of apartments i in this area will accomplish a stepping down of the intensity of land use by providing a graduation from the industrial development east of Fanno Creek to the single family development west of Hall.Boulevard and south of Bonita Road. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Commercial Development is necessary to meet the needs of the residents and emalovees for goods and services The major commercial facilities are located just beyond the - boundaries of NPO #S and will serve the majority of the demand generated in this ( wnarr�r�a�nr��rQ rrr area-ZOWevezi,three:smaII,,..areas.of coumierclaL- development are designated`ors-" the plan 'n er"ection.:of Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway, the, intersectio Page g 1 a- AMMIMEWAb Y% NPO 5 PLFL`7 TEXT ANUAR �. THE PLAN The foil--wing plan narrative describes the intentions of the neighborhood :,--I in, Organization and the City of Tigard with respect to the future develop:_m%ant of this Neighborhood. It is a "policies plan", providing guidelines for development in the form of policy statements. These policies, the accompanying text, and the pl__-i r_t_-� are to be consulted jointly when evaluating development procosals. These proposals include zone change requests, subdivision propoLals, changes in the street system, or any proposal requiring public agency review. This plan is a means of guiding development in order to achieve desired purposes or goals. This section therefore begins with the statement of goals provided in the city- wide Tigard Community Plan. These goals provide the basis and describe the broad purposes of the Neighborhood planning effort and have been included in this plan 3 in their entirety. The Neighborhood is a portion of the larger T'_gard Cc-m-Mu*zity T and these goals serve to relate this part to the whole_ S GOALS FROM THE TIGARD C0 U4UNITY PLAN (As adopted in 1971) 1. The City intends to limit the ultir•.nate population of the planning area. Th= comprehensive plan provides for a maximum population of around 115,000 people_ There are four categories of residential density, ranging from a suburban density of 2 families per acre to a high in selected areas of up to 40 families per acre. This range of residential densities is intended to provide a variety t of living environments that will accom-modate the housing needs of di-Eferent ! F family size and income. The density of population influences the character a.f residential areas and determines the demand for public facilities and services in different parts of the city. The citizens of the cor:•.^unity should knoj the density of development that is planned for different parts of the city as it affects their own neighborhoods. City officials need to 1zno".r the demands for different public facilities and services in different parts of the city. s 2. The comprehensive plan recognizes the established character of existing neighborhoods and seeks to preserve and enhance existing neighborhood values.; i Future development proposals should be. sensitive to the concern of citizens for their awns immediate_- environment as,,wwell--as to. the well being of the city as �f Honat�,. iZoad and Hall 7aoulevardy-'-an-sl the-:intexsact.�.ss�:=�':'E7pP��: � R'�=fid - and.S,E*: 72n4 The commercial devPlopmant at Hall and Pacific is actually part off' the strip commercial development along this portion of the .highway and does not actually relate or orient itself to this neighborhood. The two remaining commercial areas do orient themselves to the neighborhood, and are located for ease of access by residents or employees of the area_ Tha:.,co=mexcia3� designation at Bonita: and Hall is intended ta. serve as .a>neigiaborhoQcl s40PPIU97center. Typical businesses in this center might include a small food market._oma- delicatessen, madelicatessen, a barber shop, a beauty salon, and a self service laundr , 'ane plan's y objective. in providing. commercia-1 at this location are toz, x: .',Establish a small limited ccTmrnerci.al center in proximity to the zesidential development that will serve the i=nediate shopping needs of neighborhood residents. \ Z Z; Tdf encourage:• pedestrian shopping and minimize vefticexla�;-traff:M t`tis`c5csi�nnnitY shopping. centerwg 1.6 TQ Protect adjoining. lower intensity uses from,they; adverse5;aife�tiy.o€;noise, bright: signs, .vel-11c traffic P and visual bliglxt•th3ti:=are�ofters ' asso.ciate(I with commercial development_ The commercial development designated for the intersection of Upper Boones Ferry and 72nd is intended to serve the needs of the developing 72nd industrial area.. Typical businesses would be restaurants and/or a delicatessen and service establish- ments such as banks and barber shops. POLICY 17. As existing businesses are renovated and new ones are constructed, the site design review staff will encourage high design standards: Compatibility of land- scaping, architecture and signing will be sought. ( POLICY 18. Require the placement of utilities undergound in new developments and seek means of placing existing above ground utilities underground. ..d �; 1• -roll LOCUST fLE1I " i >•,vfj eiD 3 T Y • WF Sr W {o0p W W.WE-tom, _ LEAF 1 tT f ` ro • s t. La DUCT CT g a B W t _ 1 t -J d' tlJ.M CT S.0 Ij i S.W.0" 0- aT F J_ iC. C � sataLL R� s sl _� c'r~.s.w zt pg ��t��A {�s9 sL '> M D•. TA 9 i ja.N�N.1W T y MD6a. i L T' i.W.Wrtt2A.M A s MOTH LFI W > fT �C ` ST S.W. < i ` 1 S.W."mill 7A S.R. YA 7 W R O p 49 <I � f[SSfp wW.R1R1,NE1fT Tt S'L I 4 x 'w u W C A to fA A ST I°.vW_ I fT til PO • < UNI • i R G< O p``�` W A < + 1 N ER94� jii a.W. i• 1� _ 7 LH aAaf'6.p,RATAEi11 E•- R 7 � •> r�S < w WOODWARO 9� ' •O '>• Is DOUk'LAS�' t r'- 6ALCON Sir lZ € a.R. j L'' �� i i iW.MEADON IAT -�C l 4 b� -1 1 1• AS OR r�EE wi� T.�THEitINE t '^ : ': ^� � �- T ��fff : •C`%+• s s.N.D• _ai ' , tyr'�Of ST S N O/tA5- Yft JUfD < a.1R��ew N NNQOOk�d NN p Y ffri sT eSp'r '` JO'Wr ` Ji fT nous`%'M oEE ? a.N. �o T �:a� I`I <I 8R /t 'a OS• i ` CT1,�N 4L T 1�,( ipso,a• S• _ VLL f.p. f I S.A. IL_.JI TKMOOD DR• t RIE4� 1 I ' gupl o/ AEti ♦ dr rw fT '4 y 'Hv1,j /N/L W ZA6� �I ^' = j\ Si/i'r e• �If4•j COtlwffCf f//S -Iw �i GAR SLR• LT T IL N ! KN .4 CH UC JT pJ¢IOBC�d! `.c �r ^I x I A1I�LA LpE� r �' .N.saNNEli1 �o+,j A K/h' A I/ NPS f't ¢ N �S SRL H J �. r �'•'sw !' T '•1 \ J r' f E.W. Tct = IOM j qG >t Mf 9AIOlr s i� • �! W H �+ �i FE �'� .N3 LT �.,7.,7'.O Dt��t4F ••`r^` f. FI `.w.. f w �f. FA I AVEN .io t O' J F 1 f iTEtlIE� .N. �y I i it TSTA C «r' cl FAIRK VEN c�f R y��d.• f ~' s Y N. s {•y 1. _ i r ST.A 7N E IN i R IL LLVi• rT C NILLViEN e U O ¢ 1t4 i..�� MEA_..S � > � 11g.SE 'C OT/p�'^o pNj,�° Fji N.LARIDMARK a.IY.q BONITA n DR V T SOCU.77DCT y}' W. IEN S.W. IEw VEER >> REENSRARD i CT ILOp D}.. ST b 7fR<< S. S.M. ITA KROESE l6Q►1 ` T f.W.ri NF x�x ST i w k 61MtAli jt7WAl/sT>_> ;J / }� h; <ar,«f'�N+ > S.M. >• 1 C r -JAMES S.W FIME 6I J y j7EMILE7�1 h y„ Lf!,s D CIT i '�4 CT—' RD s S O O. �I FDI CT ♦� w � I �, �SHAKESPEARE kIONTE € MARI TN T LI:SL IE;�EIlING 4~ V • I r l ! +II�L' SEI �` `•1 $ D410t LCT DST r�1 f•- } tt Ii a J //pp �r m We f5 f 1 O f t N.fl ER -CT •1 'S � J fA�/ �1 .K' S.W.NOOD D.T s Y•s 1' Y ,�' IF" c ~4E• o a.W.W.A. EST• • , AK W W.KA E !A"�T •1'T _ - •KAI fT f 'J fN _-ptiftR ` I W \ KARRIkGT iVE • N a �� il' O _ `�� i' e�•' W JON <r (- T / > >. > >! LN. Ir! ► <T'c M4 �• ,O,i '\ 1 n:. t��<,�Ia.Ea A Flitai'Ict cl u+. fC= � f.� �'' uwr / �c•17+s O -'I:„ Ci�O S�>< T mac— i tl � �I_ b �� t. I:�-��t E�EEEEEE� t F r>S h A « 1 1 V 1 aN1ED Iiil I r L f -W qdy T MARTK.A lTEGAR > t t! D • 4 '! DALE CT rtDSBROo T fINi W � T IN '/ 2.WKITfLI�wGNf CT LL / 1• •L VILLA A �ai`� — V 3.WI HOLE CT g S.W j.�'1RILL9W S 1. WIELD CT .R. A, i < I< v . ..'••.::::� a. AM9TS IRE CT s l 4 a W TIIIaTLEWROOK CT uW .I •4 t.N. EAN LOW tE I SEL/ x 1r1 CT< °` s + �'itiF lEA61 T CT .W.HAffiRRO � ♦y 5::'•' OOT N it�lpKp _E ' �I(r,.w• �' KY f EA c" ~ RIII w Nr I 3 T.^ 1.r .�i i �'7fEA[�t M.- R � . Lft N. M.4.EnnnJ_ r.r?"C '•� g s. RA ATA '► o = • V 6 F'�: wr'' ft,{ �. g a1jRIVEI GRO Vf t] •r rRD 1 .i 4ELOS �_ t. Q!CT4a1( A3 . .6.6 f. _ CTBY C ILOS,Q �CROY[.Am� w. A Ct 9.0. CC CA MINN R • iW.RRiROM CT �X}�E Q E T �• N y p MY ENOST /1 Town IEI/DIAw PARR ,s law Eima E. Palmer 9320 SW O'Mara St. Tigard, OR 97223 82 CH YTIGARD PLRIy L Ali /T v 1 December o, 19 32 . Page One of Two -iJard :lar.ninJ Starf ECElV�® r Ti�ard Planning Commission Tigard City Council City of 'Tigard, Oregon, 97223 . Dear Members : PART ONE. . . . . Ci.NTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 'his letter is pertaining to the zoning changes and the boundry line of the Central Business District (CBD) . In NPO #1 book , page 44 , it sans Fanno Creek nra ides natural buffer between the nei-,hborhoods residential and bus ' s istric ave a map from the City of 'Tigard , exhibit 5, which shows the CBD line coming; across Fanno Creek and the Greenway into an established residential area along Hill Street which is a low density single family area and going on southeast along the Green- way adjacent another low density area of the Greenway. The' CB D* Line should adjusted to the other side of the :7reenway where the Central Business District is located so the low density single family =areas will have Fanno Creek and the Greenway as a buffer between them and the high density CBD line as stated above in the ::PO nl book. Also, an adjustment could be made to remove the new proposed shopping center near Main and Ash from the residential area. It is very vital to maintain Fanno Creek and the Greenway as a buffer to retain the character of the estaollsneilow density ( single family neighborhoods. PART TWO. . . ZONE CHANGES There are some low density single family home areas that are proposed for a higher density. Four units per acre to seven units ger acre and some areas even higher including apartments . -he NPO ,-- 1 book , page 5 , says that aoartments in Tigard out number the houses . On page 11, it says that future development should be sensitive to the concern of the citizens . Page 16, Policy #6, says the single family character of the area designated on the plan map as urban low density residential is viewed as a positive asset to be retained. Low density is 1 to 5 units per acre. :,iedium density is 6 to 12 units per acre includin'- apartments. The residents in the low density areas such as the Omara farm and all of the sur- rounding areas were zoned single family low density with 4 units per acre. .'he proposed 7 units per acre on the Omara triangle would be a 755' increase and some other areas even higher. The residents in these lo-m density areas bought their horses with the understanding that their homes and the surrounding area would be single family low density because it was zoned that way on the map. If these zones are changed , it will betray all of these residents who purchased homes in this low density neighborhood. It would ruin the character and livability of this and the surrourging C neighborhoods. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan book, page 33 , Policy No 6. 3 . 1, says new develoome nt will be of the same type and density in order to orotect the character of existing neighborhoods. Pa`,e Two of Twos Please consider us the citizens of Tigard who bought homes with the understanding that we would have Fanno Creek and the Greenway as a buffer between us and the Central Business District. NOT have the buffer between us destroyed by moving the CBD lire across the Greenway into a single family low density neighborhood. Please keep the CBD line on the other side of the Greenway buffer where the businessdistrict is so we can retain the quality, livability and character of our existing and established neighborhood. By putting yourselves in our position in buying a home in a low density residential area because it was zoned that way on the map, you will understand that we are the ores who will suffer if the zones are changed to higher density. In closing, please leave our residential area low density single family, so we can retain the character of our neighborhood. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Paul and Gloria Johnson i i E - RgeT M.ilelanicb DEC 31982 CITY OF TIGARII 811 Skinner Building, Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 623-6230 PLANNING DEP November 29 , 1982 Mr. Jeremy Coursolle Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD P .O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 98223 Re: Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map; Property Located at Greenburg Rd. & Shady Land 1S135BC, Tax Lot 200 Dear Jerry: Enclosed is a letter to the Planning Commission which I would like entered into the Public Record during the Hearings concerning the hat proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map effect the subject location. Please contact me should you need any additional information, since I would be pleased to discuss this matter further with you should I be able to be of any further assistance. Very truly yo , lko er M. B anich RMB/s d enc. Roger M.Belankh D o o-Hama 811 Skinner Building, Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 623-6230 November 29 , 1982 Planning Commission CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 98223 Re: Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map; Property Located at Greenburg Rd. & Shady Lane 1S135BC, Tax Lot 200 Gentlemen: Concerning the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map review, I wish to make reference to the above property, shown in red on the attached assessor' s map, marked "Exhibit A, " and the land use specifically proposed for this property. The current classifi- cation and background is as follows : Comprehensive Plan: General Commercial NPO #2 Zoning: C-3 Use: Vacant; Design Review Submitted for retail buildings . Planning History: The undersigned has owned this property for ten years and has been continuously involved with compatible interaction with the community, the City of Tigard, and Washington County for over eleven years concerning the use of this property and that of the surrounding community. In 1971, this property, plus the adja- cent property now owned by Mobil Oil, were zoned R-7 Washington County. (See "1971 Original Zoning" attached as "Exhibit B. " ) A request was made by me to Washington County for rezone to C-2 General Commercial . The County Planning Director referred action on the matter to the City of Tigard as being within Tigard's "sphere of influence . " The City of Tigard had not defined land ( continued. . . ) I mmmd I City of Tigard Planning Commission November 29 , 1982 page two use for the properties bordering Highway 217 and Greenburg Road west of the interchange and wished at that time to resolve the entire land use issue for this area. This was of particular interest for two reasons: Washington Square was about to be built, and the City wished to annex that subject area into the city limits. The City Planning Director, Ray Rangila, urged the community to fund a land use study as a guideline to a revised Comprehensive Plan for this area. The undersigned, together with other_ property owners within this area, funded approximately $6, 000 . for an outside con- sulting firm to study this area for the City Planning Department. This study became known as "Shady Lane Land Use Study. " A copy 3 of the body of the study is enclosed as "Exhibit C. " 6 After a total period of one year of study, and total community involvement, the City recognized this study as the basis of land F use for thirty-five acres east of Highway 217 bordering Greenburg Road ( and later adopted it into the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tigard) . Thereupon, the City recommended to Washington County that the R-7 zoning of my property be changed to C-2 General Commer- cial (see letter from City of Tigard to Washington County, marked "Exhibit D" and Staff Reports of July 11, 1972 , marked "Exhibit E") . The rezone was approved August 1, 1972 . t t At a later time in 1977, the City Planning Director, then Dick Bolan, requested me to annex into the City, which I did on February 8, i C 1978, bringing Mobil Oil also into the annexation (see "Exhibit F" ) . Thereafter, I cooperated with the City to organize an approach to annex the Cascade Industrial Park into the City. In May 1978, I was required to rezone the subject property, since after the annexation the zoning classification had not been changed. 1 The Planning Commission unanimously approved the zoning. as C-3 in ' conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. (See attached Application and Tigard Staff Report, May 2, 1978, and Planning Commission Hearing, marked"Exhibit G" . ) i Currently, I have submitted an application for Design Review of the property in conformance with the C-3 zoning. The study plans for that application have been underway for approximately 2k months . It is most appropriate and within the concepts of good planning that the Comprehensive Plan for the subject property remain General Commercial. It should be emphatically ntoed that the propertys has never been a part of Cascade Industrial Park (see Cascade Annexa- tion, attached at "Exhibit H. " ) In fact, the size limitation of 51, 000 square feet does not lend itself to industrial type use. Furthermore, the property is not oriented toward Cascade nark, but is clearly oriented toward the interchange, Greenburg Road, and the commercial land uses making up the intersection. This is the manner in which the property has been community analyzed, County (continued. . . ) i k City of Tigard Planning Commission November 29 , 1982 page three a zoned, Comprehensively Planned, annexed, and City zoned. It is my request that the property remain in the Comprehensive Plan as General Commercial. a r Very truly you YoWcjerM.' Be anich 4 RMB/s d enc. i' x 7 i E, 2 CF, t i i gk S F i r t s }z} r JI J f� ii 1 SEE MAP { \ IS I 35 BB 0 / � �gg 663.53 1059.5 197.00 388.8 58. o 20 / q •� _ 300 ' ^ /.43 Ac. //8 4,Ac. a / Aom%�Gomm OMENS W / 0 /O2 q q1 y 1 O of „ 100, sr ham. 9 6 .68 Ac. '9°4 rQ 140.0 0 3 t �us ---,r00 .OS Ac. ZO.32 o 22'W 279.55 723 /2 O 9'BI � of O 6.50 • 581.2a N 89-n 9'E 220 3.4 N 89'49'E 601.2M 9j 0g q'/7° 133.49 h CaEG �769122,w 1 N 94.30 N 89 22 W � s O 900 /��•o, 2.87 Ac. 9t.35 yey 1 SEE MAP I S I 35BD N I o~ I yo �64 moo. CI. ya&a qcc®sem N 69*32'W 277.59 0� �� 3660, S 891 37 44 E 280.89 Y 1000 0 /.39 Ac. 011 el w j N `••N d' O O 3 80o 31, ye 0 0 :L"G�:' G/YY Or`- -//c:=-i=b�'l� i`:�.it/L%✓//'i':_'> CO/;`1N1/�:�/c��✓ ulll r' r t - �! 1, 7 /�.A.-' .• _ /� ......... . .- i. — - - - -- -- — till -- .... I • .. _ �- . r I i C r: y'x t-- W ua U) mom T % •� rte: t_. �.+ � � ' /r . -- J 1. 409 I,�....... .. r 43 - I ICJ f ---------- L f -------------- !3oi --- --------------4 Gil --- ------ ----------------- --•----------------------------4 h1c ---------------------------5 Noi Ci ------ -- ------- ------------------------ L T IT G -- -6 -------- ------------------------- ----------- ---------------------7 c ----------------------------10 ------- ----------------------------12 ;l----------------------------------------------12 LL -i IS---------------- ----14 14 ------------------------- -------------------------------15 G --- ----------------------------------- ---------------------- LA I �t l i r KAN t 1 PITK^ L C :i soca C!d Cil! i.: L:,,. U. S. Tigard The rCI:,Ui't ii:.. .l ,I I and USE`, anal, ! l ll; 1ht GI l. 1:1 lil lg �•( ...: t:iil; ! �;l'. ('•_i I v,lj- straints Thefil t�i.1C�U4 ,j {! li) li',;i' U1 tC!� S Ch illl Cr. U,I ( i , i U.:liui)I IIfUY'illd�:l'Jil l f, l . L . ...f ', i 1 i ii l C:i i UiI itliU il!1. of data I I'• ..l Ili. l i :,: I ! G! l:.. I - C! i:.Jl'u11'_'ili.t report SCi.i l f." „ _III I I'- I 11 .1(I,' 1;_t 1"CCi, lldo l rhe 1'i'.CG; 0'.16 i c !lJ o:lS r, t', t..i,.iI t i v IILu'l.?oil. ) C. :'1'. ,.; t,l, lilillEl"tai:('ll iX:(vI"l moi' I This rcpG'i ! '. lC'1,i I;' i i I1,C,:'I! ,J f'Jl' OK (2'':ClUSlVC1 TIE' City :Illlt(J�.oil 11! CiiL' Or consent U! _ Jc SITE l,HAir. t. l_!. l ;,efinitiun o. The Shack Lzo:_ LOUf;.ii.,d On tlt(: 5=.i,'%• rtGll- 11, .,rd rXj7rC'tis:, ly, 011C!JL., !'," :IIUC: Jakot e 5l !'t t'.L ( :! Y. `._.t I I:i'iiC'!1 l._e l'.. T;,. Sl!lij`/ (l- �UCfi.':) tllY' i' l:ii`' I O L_ C:II thc _,l(1t_ OI llri: Size: Of StLlj�- . .,'c.. . 34 act'+_", �c.!•I°) Unll'i.: l �.'} t. 5 K � 1 i If t1r: i t I, 1 c' .,tet:, _ _ C.t JI uc,'r }. •v.' � ., I, C, t, 1 t.. tit ti �;. f,llil. !•i '. i . ,.lt.11 . , .. . ,. . i. _ i.._ „_ :;'. �.C)�iF; t'.,;t: C,i t-.'%a 1!. - � . � ,. '. , I:. _ ,. i� , .'C li , ,._ it",,. i. illil„i ,t l!•- d ;0110 t i .. 't1C•f: („ i 1 ' I ' i ,Ili .'1.'%Ii U, t , !. .i! 1 , I�-. . !. , „ _ � Ili•_' c)t l_:Y"' ..'t;� � ...:1. of t.ii�' CJI�Iii't�.. C•t .i. _I t _ ul'.. I 1 ..i' Ll IS Se LS. it:_ Sic:. ) i 1t.:',:i!i larlrl uses . is 1 5 f t'll, l,i(. .,:: .c. JI. I:;-fl'i.:i 1).-kW . IY _ !CI:-� OWMAW 44 OWN" a i i i i. :1711 t it:l:L: L.n tl L CC'llt(..IlIJ I i I L At-CJu . I .. . :. , I 1 I It 1'idy ACCGi'il Masst l;i i I I L1 '; l i `/ G1" C T, (�}"Oii: l i li 1 C _' I ;.I / (7 . . l! !• ,r } OT tit:. iOt�t'I Ilu ;I j•..I' i.' i UY' gl'UUj' Of jJc`.1 t I O'.iii(: i LY t lI ictY'. i CC it" I l i':' i i i. IIIV UI tC_it Yl-1-tri-o,., C'r Ashi , 1' , .. I ..ill .l Ti. :iaju CGllslil:'1 aggl'egai, iti'.i L", _i : j .4 t' s cel s l.'J 't It •.ll' 1 C!I Ic:1,J OilA ac: ;).,rCC'� i 1 des il _ i: .. 11.. . _l .. I' CL;I W P', .II C'I': Lf. Uci!c•., 11 t 1 1:..__ C i tI: I L 1 . I hey Lc.L. ',d the Ii•Lit' Ji ii 111`. t.0 t L(_'1 CC1 I_. .1'i ll.i .; iI u L;,,. GreLii:..„ Uelicil'i,11 .l. { L iii I,( t : a1_ J .:. r. t. .. Jl.iil.,: UI ',v(. the pii:I"I_, ` lti j, iL• ,. 11 SCi C{,JCI u.{, l>tU c)I' t11C9 jlr0j)C:'1'tV l:Oil SOI iC iw_'U. r Zonilt, 4 Zorllittji.i7.l: 1I CIaS-i f1Ca- tion5 . I,;- I I� I� IIiI;S . Il !'I• j . . ' IcL..I Iy Clt. 11 lil:'` , ?•J u C - J gen�1"d� l lcOI 1, I)_sli•:I.,`ICcI .. '-I I:t-' I('' i . i.. t�.i Ilei"i.!i :)! li _ 1 ,A ! 11'L,t_:,..{ ra i It grant' i.. <_ui, i. ;, t'_ i.,' _ i iitl -J, Coil L011li;i.j I I .. .i .-\ ., . `,i. , .. i (.:. ) "C_� l rUils_ ., on C I Ad c e nt z I I i:,•-. r Ji IL ind'u, trial predomirkil'10 '.1 oil L;w 'w""L' t21 iY sick: of Poloid. Ti(iard Coii—;Iiii-i"I�, ii Tt!:-- Tigeii,(' Con"Lil tant S oll for Litt,- P%1 .'a north of j c'f Ash Creek. Icz; Linils do II( i t Iit Wi t 11 C Ll i-I't Zo I I I I I C::1 S t'i I;Cl d L i C,i-- C I I"V("I ui'(213 vi Lill 11 Ie Study Arua . Allilexati oil: Fast plaiminci for ti:,. Sh i. . 1-alle Study f r'k(.!"ie Ilted b'v, (Jovern mer'tal juri-'diction ' "JI-11i purtiolls c)I' 1*11,1 s :I Le 6eing within the City . . of Tigard Lwl -in i 11,(I t 0 COU 0 tY. The City of Tigard v hr! en t-il- -! Sli.�c"', La Study l'irpit Tlii s pro- recently pvopo� rd I i,i cll cil 0 1 i Lill 17111 la Local Govern,,i,c�ntal %,,as �;pprovt_:d t;-,./ tiw: Pui,L laii( lel.t o 1. 'dcalL, Oil June 27 , 1972. voted upoii I)JI EWL'�k "CSl I (kti - ' -1 - I - a 11 lig effect on pl, ti i It is arit'cip-it'-d t.t 1 r, witilill tjj'-! n %ii sLxoij,j_1y cowider City of ciard ' s "sp lie re Of 11-1 I'l U ence,. Tigard reccil.!:ii2ndci. uiis i I i ir`CcA-, COh.,i6t:c(,'d i L 1i 1 11 1 1 This site is. '-luch Lit Acct:::s : L 1"Jjcr acct. 'c, to d: "i -Clic: B 2'1 v ol-1--l-i qlard 15 C u I I Y h(2i I K) C01-ic t I UC i!t IAI'0 is 110 dil-k2Ct �ICG S iO L( I . JL' 4 - , I L;�I c. 1W It(' i CU:l 'L*'I-- FX! !wine; nrcivicted to v;'2"L I 'i c t I On 01,2 S.i ,L.(, Li i-•.Jy m-co., I tJo-, 'Icci' iii Q.I I j,'0 1*4LI -(_e t p V (i ,.orti on of th-'- site i ,. ii;,two"i: UtIll.,I)I-Oved access to J)i,, Li011', 01 L111" ;-1 t tf I I t'(Ml SOU th 4e S t 9 b'I 11 1!U, I I 1 0 V J: o)rtioiis of the site ft Shady Law. aril S.W. i:Ut_LiI SLI•eCL. v4jor traffic f)_"11 tlw Site, nov,, (,,(:ckjr Lil 1-1-le 1>' --Tigard "y and Gremnhurq t;'Ie CL'ji r 15 c( d ad other C i L iS CXh" �C�d 1h'kL i alc Wi 11 Increase i hoth thr! c routc%s. lr(iffic Oil Gi';2-21&UI-C.I Road will bc: zi'li*cctf-,d itS ii:(-il'icir'fit ill Uer'.-ection vrith Paci Fic fli4 rear Tigard' s c-iLy c(_-m.;-r ;wi ui:L!ii wi d,-:iii rig LProject!. to Ileviate th��,c- j„ c 1)1 i;1. d , 1)1 (All-)'C-110 y I ov! oil tha city s ;1ri or i ty 1 i_t. southeI 1 11". -g PoLid c The rly �u S, Xililul C 1 1200 feet norLih ol- L!!,' StUdy 4 [SRI i -1 C t 'Ll b i 1)y TI Tr i he ,.rovides -Lk 1ortlalid uli 0 C C,1� I f) Utilities : SLvier The mite is An existing 27 i m h Sewer l i ne 1,011C I Plater A 6-inch v.,ater iiiLiin rrovided by Lhe !.letzrjc2r 'Hater District, exists along Greenburg Road Electricity Electrical energy i s avai I ahl o to the site tjjj.o�jgjI the Pot-ti General Electric C(i i Y Gas flatura 1 gii S Sc-)-Vi CE'. i S V;!i"i a h-1 e at t;:.-- I rom !!ort I iviest Naturo I Ga F, CujjI)zmy via 6 2-- iw,::: Tel crikwie C 1)I'D V 6 c�cl to Lhe Shady Lane site by the Genera TL- Noi so L Tile Study ikrr,a h(,S 0 nn-1 .`'.t' pro�)It'lil of i i rela` ionship to `.he bee,v(_-rtn;I I' I c!,--I Cif' Ll i (1U;' LO ti-ZIFIf.IC t 0 Starting et Lki, ;,-) Sor_.• not se �.i I 'I L ill I i:.j th, s CO,. I C..t C_.d a t t I I i S site; hov+,,vCi" iioisc- w` Ii.f"Lit: JW(A) Ash Creel, Lando-oner-, wi Li; iii al'O ' ('I tO PCSSL-Ss a occurringU.- Advio,,LL;tje ckould to adjicollt dev L:I opno; (1L, Ly Cit 51 "'.esh CI -,(21 a C_ grecriv:ay. a i},e C: iU t:+ i, ( it Li }; .. �!' i11 V X U I ltiC {�I !ii ,_' I ,:i:ij, Aa i.lor)`, : il'� 1,. . 1 „ •1' _ , ' L .1 t•r.;1 1.�, ( :il -..I.,-,I'•-. .. 1,� 1 11 ., ... .. 11, : ... •,/i 'iI .�1' : i ,ui '.I�. I,. I 1...:'l_: I .:1: _ inU''}: il( �'._ ;1 ,,. .,. , .. _ .. l;) l.l:. I'v•,... :: C I.:� Li ._,-�.. , ., �,I'C::'lI_i�:ii i y Cr1•Ci r _ o- I:PSl C}f=Ili l%. I V u' . . .... l? ,.I I'-.C l i. r'it I `. C j i1 CP11'Lr'(: i r"-- c it;,I ui i nr.ct;i .Il l,(,�I, ii5 �1({:':,. III1 . 0 • l!.;III Ai.:' ''Aj. I t}1?i C(:Ii: o.lJ }`rUlll j }1C. l i'. ,:i; � III:iXli')"z 11( Ali • ,:rlt':u'r s CO(111L'i:t?U•i', ji'i�, :iC'r' i.. (', t.0 `l }i C.t-C'('{ It I,L'Cii--sti'1i111 ci11U l,'i (aj �,uthway i.• {•o, c,��:�,�1_,i ., j�;n%; ;!,� II Ci cul:. Cor,ccp TiiiS }U(lliil'tll. I:EIi_'iI!- i-U: 'i,' _d CI!t`.lh:". 11/ 01 IiiillLi - i3Ii1? SOlil:. co.I...,'r'C'11, } i!C•. . ii ( ? f!;.CI, } CfI;,_. i:ll { l'Ji:;•t Uf �.CCVSS l J I: l . i t C•. I 1:, I 1 1 i:. ., .i: .:lil'� 1.1;1 ✓ CE_.`; pi C. ,.. !.. u . I t , I . . II II _j',:(.L �1"ri d i I I J 0:;. i 7 lako all(, r. 'r I::!:I ,,^c,(: I I t.`. r:_ . ;'o 1'c:;iC:{ l0 (i_,,. i1v:. c({4,...1.%tt (:Or11ii )n t.il}.E111 C.S . Atl —{ illi: i Jtl } 1/'_u 1"l LLl l't liii- l( ,.. ,.•t _ ! i i._.- 1 Oi' IL•I%. li��_,�.. .. 11,. :;i - 1.i_.1 . ., I I�.ii r Ma 1 (,I'_t 'hi,i Y'i'jiUT"C 1' j I i 11ii ' li,.{., i"i, (,"i i .:Il:( �'SC. l) L}, �U!)jCC'{ �','{O of it Ili i! V CI r: •. 1 li...{i'(Iill`! II I f;:illi f Sel"�`'iCL.—� , ..il, s,.iT.!,./' j , �, I �:SI resAaul ilk Ci C! - iI... i .... _ .. : aII i,. ., : ilt, t,i_ I.. :�ill :I II _ •� oo 01 �t' ,1�?T i''1 l,.I - !' .. , ...i _, i:I,✓ �• i..1 I i. .• � ..�. I�, I : . :., ! I cxlltE .. .'� .. .� -' !• � . . � � ,. .`�• ,..- .. ,. t.. l-:1 flit,-."� .;i: I ANA31ILM�MAN= &Am I ff M_m mommam—amm —mom South of i ciiL(il t;,i Its Lht-1 I-,)' r to widdle L lol a degree oi- c , c ..tlCril (.Olt r L i i C-11 1 1)e mutua"11%, For Y'_ lCj11C i) coord-i IlLt W! Ceneral I i 1_s cwl-l-crit Cc;;. �wity L.:Ild USE, 11iin (ICs ic"l in the SAL!.",' Al C-i 1 0:',1 1 111 cl i s t r-i ,I i i f L I,-ban 1-.126'iDill Ucll Ly Resi dinti I-,, 1 16 L) s ci,.'11 L'. I czl -C-,)1. „1 L Recoinmend z;io, v.,Ithin the Study h,_; 11rocessed thi-ouc:11 the Planned Unit Ordinance of th.-2 City of Tirjard. i. Reconutnd consolidation of private holdingc tho Si-imly lwC�& , so as to mzjxl;:Jze potential in terit'is ol- Ievc:;Iuo, ae'stl[C.Lics and function. Effect sr!,isitivc, of I)IIij,dilig p'11_-:c-l.;, .ni. gild heird,L, rwrlkinq , wri access ot!.Ilcr .i 'L .; v`; i, .uS that af-f-c-cA duv(: I op- meat. SU(,,gC_St it jj,4jj,*j."jjjj C!i2 I Lr! C Z, cc the natur,:'l iiiji,-it'i l is )-j a va ry i-.,j -' Lj Z''-. LO CUfl"i :Ljr. Re C 01 Ial C-:1 Z,I(:,:!f! Ash -Ij M:11"1 a q(--o'lo-Clic �.i : s i i zi 1 ih u S Creel: so c,,. io C)i _(L',U.,Ci,lLI0;iS. Recowi,-i2nd I u;i u; this repurt. B D I MEN .'A JUN 2 -0 oc VOt- -A-n 6Ez fol: u —:,rth stu!ly) aj. ._v .- ..:is _.�....-..rr.. Y:...._lL.. _.__.. :"!7....iJ �(":`_L�� Lt:: J};._. � 1,::'1Cat to th-Z! Ti"'.1rd cov-w-'llity IL, O . 0.. l cl C' "''ll'ty I L-Idurtrlal fcr L" .al it ia ut, Ur of Road. Lit;roet �nd Y of j cic tonin;;. j: for rial dev,:t r -.rc.-,ds in c,U. t i n use, nor With cUrrczrit of t.`!:� o _kmy r. C.C)-�ll C-3, G-ncmnl -,rvic� :tat-Jon in lo;;,-ted on the northowt fAnd oriuili%cd for 16 is locatc-1 on a C-3 pa-Cl :jr'j JWo otjl.i_r loti; Doth Of :;h-IQY on West Y the _j(;, Of C. z4cce_.,s to such devolo_n; nt for 1wad anu climinutc the 11cc d to ;c to C.,ItL:I* any jjc,-_ woilia he r0f.LriCLI;:d to the r,)"d j:.,dusts',--I :;Outll Of C: :�c: jvL: - .: pooni'l)ility for cc;, ajc.-, G * cnbur iicCl t.-affic. 1,2zards rz%nultini; frot:,, entcrin6, oriented ijoc:: should stir. '.,,::..ffic Would Dl this .l', C:. or Liiziuy L.::nw to 6(--t back C,I JUL-.e a r,ci v:--T:i, for Ccu:iLy Guacral commk;rcial and th..:: road On a-in tO uh�-, i�J. , im- plurlaing I COT, Jty i'j:tIj. 11c)'re Qrj to nLTLIZ)cr Una county's. Itz" j L,1.10 L;a r"i (i wrl t'. Th. _'i Lard Planning IC:fore issmAnce jz,,-, c:uunz-y !,ult--i-family Recidential ccJrzlcr Of :.w,; ;c,.Lorm .;o ihk-, V.C,:,ru Planning Lo in the xth o-, land U:-u Uo,i:L, -1 i �rict, d"u,"t'-,101:rclit L j Lit Lo �i- W� , i;uk-z;'�a C doc5 nur, rcquirc pli--n 1,1.-Oj.erty G^ 'en t!-'2 fi'o-.' .,eat aide Of Gfcell'bul.-C u-, I-,uzr :,-rjc)r intur- caj-, -L-t; Lind away ,-,f t:I street ani -rte with a plai�i and- 't{, i..._.._,.,. `�,...:L..- ,, lad,. !a i t � l -a � gct._.�i�,: ., �q:�c.--. i-,._, �:I�ce rc�......::c:....ciur::;, �?cu::.0 f .L.. j.. .... .. ._ � I �:1�;...... .._.. I v [...i.._.t.J� ! .� ��/ �.y _ 'i... ...�:f., is=:u. l k_ t , +F= WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report July II, 1972 F t Zone Change 72-174-Z for property described as tax lot 1300, 1301 (ptn.) ? 1400 and 1500 on tax map ISI 35B. Applicant: Dona id Quinn, et ai. i APPLICANT'S REQUEST Approval of a change of zone classification from R-7, Single Family Resi- dential, to C-2, General Commercial, on a parcel of land containing approx- imately 1 .8 acres. LOCATION AND LAND USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject site, supporting two (2) dwellings and several accessory buildings, is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of SW Greenburg Road and the Beaverton-Tigard Expressway in the north Tigard area. i SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE The subject site abuts R-7, Single family Residential, to the east and north supporting part of the right-of-way of the Greenburg/Beaverton-Tigard Expressway Interchange to the north and a service station and two (2) residences within the City of Tigard across Greenburg Road to the east. The subject site also abuts M-3, Light Manufacturing to the south, west e and north supporting industrial structures in the Cascade Industrial Park, 3 vacant land to the west and another industrial structure across Cascade Avenue to the south. APPLiCANT'S JUSTIFICATION The applicant states that: �1 "To change the land zone classification from residential to general com- mercial (R-7 to C-2) to become compatible with neighboring land uses, both existing and planned. Present traffic volumes, neighboring development , patters, end existing land values preclude residential development in this ares. Further with the completion of the Highway 217 - Greenburg Road Interchange and development of Washington Square shopping center, the immediate site and nearby area will become even less suitable for housing. High traffic volumes, generated by the 217 - Greenburg Interchange (under construction) and Washington Square Shopping Center (approved for develop- ment), will create substantial need for auto-oriented service facilities at this location. The single, existing service station in this vicinity has inadequate service capacity to properly serve the volume of traffic projected for this Intersection. (Projected ADT by State Highway Depart- I ment is 30,000 vehicles in front of proposed station site.) The requested use is in conformance with industrial-park uses within the { City of Tigard. It is not in conformance with the Washington County Plan f' of Development. However, the county plan was prepared prior to the opening 1 of Highway 217 and plans for the regional shopping center. As such, the I plan does not reflect conditions and trends in effect in the site area today." r i -/, -00,, 72-174-Z Page 2 :i OF lniV( TO Tic OcV LG=' ciVT The adopted Plan of Development for the area designates 'the subject pro- perty for Industrial Park and Light Industrial Development. i PUBLIC UTILITIES REPORT The Metzger Water District and the Sanitary District have submitted written verification of the availability of sewer and water services for the subject site. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIGNS The subject site is a portion of a greater area encompassing approximately 34 acres at this intersection for which a land use feasibility and Market- ing Study entitled Shady Lane Economic Land Use Study was prepared. The City of Tigard has stated that they feel a commercial use on the pro- perty between Cascade Road and the frontage road west of Greenburg would be appropriate in order to eliminate the necessity for southbound traffic to cross Greenburg Road to avail themselves of similar commercial services. STAFF FIND114GS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The staff finds that this request does not conform to the adopted Plan of Development ( 1959) but conforms to the City of Tigard's Plan. 2. The staff finds that the Tigard Planning Commission is recommending that the Commercial Industrial and Urban Medium Density designated in the Tigard Community Plan be amended to Urban Medium Density Resi- dential and Residential Commercial . ( 3. It Is the staff's opinion that approval of the requested zoning and j the subsequent development of a commercial use on the subject site is contrary to the County's 1959 Plan however, by working with the City of Tigard, the Shady Lane Study was evaluated by the City and it was the cities opinion that the request is appropriate. i 4. Based upon the Department's practices to defer to City recommendations where a newer plan than the County's is available, the staff recommends i that the request be approved. S I i 1 01V` .A Off+ K7t, � �OGh►6y cn -4} n v 2 a0'*- in CD AVE . in 160'* R 070 H 0 ti N ZONE CHANCE Iters No. 72 - 331 - Z area of consideration from R- 7 to C- 2 and 'Z' SCALE I " = 200' 11j* Proposal ; ,� .r.'M• pSy,nGi4n ;,JUNft CnEvON . + Is••: �� I H/�,H � __ .._. _�_ �� ''E»U s Asa -E4 _ - - - _.. ,.,, 11_:'1,- __.a... '�' '�x,•,�1 ,/�� ;s. C�• / LFA - - ..._. ---~' - - .'�- ..,`. /'`,J H Z 0 J!� 1/1 :. T' AREA 'iC) BE �` _ -' - _A f. 23- A�TrrExED y 'Z0Z .4VE. 3 CZ TY OF TIGARD P\` CASCADE. -66 Vv 23-6, may'= A. \, ! cro ate.-� :•�^'-.'•. ?ROPOSAL 140. 3,184 �c CITY OF TIGARD A*TNEXAT1014 FIG. 2 13,E APPLICATION FOR ZONE MAP AMENDMENT REQUEST The subject property was annexed into the City of Tigard, February 8, 1978, as approved by Boundary Change Proposal No. 1184. The zoning designation remains as Washington County B-4 General Commercial . It is appropriate that the land use be desio_nated under the zoning code of the City of Tigard. The request would transfer the General Commercial designation of Washington County to the General Commercial designation of the City of Tigard. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The requested Zone Map Amendment conforms to the Tigard General Plan. PUBLIC BENEFIT The uses allowed under General Commercial will allow the property to service the retail and office needs in the area of the community that are generated by the subject location adjacent to the Greenburg Road interchange, its interaction with Washington Square Shopping Center and the other commercial activity along Shady Lane which will be developed in conformance with the General Plan. AREA DEVELOPMENT The subject property is surrounded by Cascade Industrial Park, a service f station and the Highway 217 interchange. All services are available to the site. A curb-cut on Greenburg Road is already in existance mutually servicing the Mobil service station. Therefore, it is compatible to the land uses already in existance. The property is currently zoned in Washington County. The change in the jurisdiction to the City of Tigard justifies the zone change. SUITABILITY This is the only area of the City of Tigard that is adjacent to Washington Square and the zoning is justified in its compatability to that major shopping center and also the main freeway interchange servicing the Center. IMPACT The surrounding land uses are of a higher use than the request. The traffic would enter the subject through an existing curb-cut on Greenburg Road. 3 STAFF REPORT TIGARD PLAT KING CO-NIIIISSION !Agenda 5. 2 May 2 , 1978 Fo�bler .3unior High School - Lecture Room 10865 S .«' . talnut Street - Tigard, Oregon Docket : zone Change ZC 10-78 Request : For a zone map amendment from to City County B-4 "General Extensive Commercial" Commercial" for parcels totaling 1 .23 acres. Lane Location : InterseCoioTaof t.iap Gye1Sle 5B, Tax Lots 1300nburg Rd. and 3, 1303, (Na 1400 and 1500) . 4 Applicant : Roger Belanich t I . Findings of Fact : 1 _ The site is designated "Retail Commercial" on the NPO #2 Plan Map and currently zone ltiashincgton County B-4 (General Extensive Commercial ) . 2 . The; applicant is requesting the application of the City of Tigard zoning ordinance to recently annexed (February 8, 1978) Parcels totaling 1 .23 acres . �- 3 . City of Tigard Ordinance 78-21 (April 1 directs the Planning Commission to conduct ssuc h uc proceedings as may be necessary to conform the authorized �-:oning and land use of the parcel to the requirements of the City ' s Zoning Map and Code. . II . Staff Findings & Observations 1 . The site is relatively flat and below grade of SN Greenburg Rd. A large oak tree is located about in the center of the parcel . Surrounding land uses are commercial and industrial buildings to the west , east and south, Highway 217 is located to the north. 2. Nater Sol-vice is available to the site from the Tigard Water Districts eight inch line in SW Cascade Avenue . STAFF REPORT. TIGARD PLANNING CO\MISSION llgenda 5. 2 May 2, 1978 Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 S .W. Walnut Street - Tigard , Oregon Sanitary sewer is available from the Unified F Sewerage Agency and eight inch line in* ST: Greenburg Road. 3, Southwest Greenburg is designated as. an arterial street north of .North Dakota Street requiring - 80-120 of right-of--way. There is currently sufficiently right-of-way to meet these standards4;_... Southwest Cascade Avenue is designated collector street requiring 60 foot miliimum right-of-way . There currently exists .50 feet. Therefore, an additional 5 feet of dedication will be necessary. Both southwest. Caseade Avenue and the frontage road running parallel to southwest Greenbury; Road are in substandard condition (no curbs or sidewalks) . III . Conclusionary Findings : 1 . There exists a public need to apply City of - Tigard zoning to all parcels of land in the city in order to ease the administration of land use regulations and assume consistency throughout -the city. 2 . The proposed C-3 ening district is compatible with the surrounding zoning and Retail Commercial Plan designation . IV. Staff Recommendation : Based on the preceeding findings of fact and conclusions, staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1 . Five :feet of right-of-way be provided algng the Cascade Avenue frontage. .2. The applicant file with . the City Recorder an agreement not to reoionstrate against a Local Improvement District (LID) for street improvements to SW Cascade Avenue and the frontage road along the southeastern portion of the property, MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION 'May 2, 1978 Page 3 development and they couldn't deny his application, °Tepedino asked staff about incremental increases of traffic addressed. *Brian stated that he felt if the plot was developed, as R•-7 into Single Family Residences propably more traffic would be.'generated than by this Commercial Professional Development, i 'Rossman wanted Popp to clarify his position 'Popp stated he was in favor QBrian wanted some sort of control factor over the traffic and made a motion for approval based on staff findings and staff recommendations and added "for the southern 215' of the.lot" after #2. j 'Wood seconded f The vote was unanimous for approval. • F 4 ZONE CHANGE ZC 10-78 NPO s 3 A request by Roger Belanich for a zone map amendment from County B-4 "General E::tensive Commercial" to City C-3 "General r-ommarcial" for parcels totaling 1.23 acres at the intersection of SW Greenburg Rd and Shady Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35B, Tax Lots 1300, 1303, 1400 and 1500).- A. Staff Report: 3ead by Altman B. Applicant's Presentation: S Roger Belanich, 2330" 43rd Ave. E., Seattle, stated he had owned the property for 6 years and a Shady Lane Study had been made to analyze the best use for that area; the Comprehensive Plan was then adopted and the area zoned Retail/Commercial. Sakata asked for an exact location, next to the Tinker Toy Store? Belanich answered it was between the bakery and Tinker Toy Store and had a 24' frontage. C. Public Testimony: None D. Staff Recommendation: Based on the preceeding f--ndings of fact and conclusions, staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Five feet of right-of-way be provided-along the Cascade Avenue frontage. 2. The applicant file with the City Recorder an agreement not to re- monstrate against a Local Improvement District (LID) for street improvements to SW Cascade Avenue and the frontage road along the southeastern portion of the property. i i MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 2, 1978 Page 4 E: Commission Discussion: °Sakata questioned if the 24' was enough for a driveway °Staff stated 30' right of way and 24' paved was the access requirement *Brian asked if this problem should be addressed now 'the applicant thought it was a step ahead of time 'Staff refered to Sec. 18.64.030 of the Tigard Mcnicipal Code to state with 1-99 parking spaces the minimum access was 130' with 80% paved 'Brian stated there was another exit *Brian recommended approval based on staff findings and recommendati *Quimby seconded the motion 'the vote was unanimous 5.3 CONDITIONAL USE_ CU 9-78 . (Kolve) NPO 3 A request by Gerald Kolve and Donald Kettleberg to operate a title insurance company in a C-4 "Neighborhood Commercial" zone do a 6.74 acre parcel (Canterbury Square) at 14363 SW Pacific Hwy., (:Dash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10A, Tax Lot 1700). A. ;,taff Report : Read by Altman B. Applicant's Presentation: (, Gerald Kolve, 2210 S.W. Brooklyn Blvd., Portland, stated he needed a tenant at this location which would attract short term parking, with no high volume, and chose a Title Company which also conforms to C-4 zoning as a Conditional Use and does not impose any major impact on the shopping center with less than 27. of the total area of the shopping center. C. Public Testimony:None D. Staff Recommendations: Based on the preceeding Findings of Fact and Conclusions, staff recommends approval of the applicant's request as submitted. E. Commission Discussion: *Wood moved for approval based on staff findings and recommendations Rossman seconded The vote for approval was unanimous 5.4 CONDITIONAI. USE CU 10-78 (herb JundL) NPO 3 A request by Herb Jundt for an outside display and storage of sales and E rental C:quipment on a 2.1 acre parcel in a C-4 zone at the corner of ` SW Gaarde and Pacific Ilwy ( .Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 IOA, Tax Lots 1300 and x.41 Lt_., :,.� `� 1 .;� :,a �_ •� o ;�� M1 fa � � ,� , ,^31. -oe 1 :r"' \ � ` `,1•, 1 ��C; a `.rhe r`,'� IL I�11 Q tl� cn Cal CL 01, ``�tryT�-'.�_'s,-� �.'c ., - 1. —� aoe �, Q � �'G7••.. O V - civ 0_5 -2 c0l,��' tic.`! ! C.J K�" ` /`. r v{ i ,r� �"_•'i/,; }�� [ _ ��c.s%�7F �C71 Atli '`V�'V.q•�\/ �J �'�M. 101�'F'`�- i� i O o k. ¢� � -loll _ '� r,,,I _I .�:_•�, oma, w y;� (y+� r R'�`•J�_:_p�:>_z^-'_�- � sep>t p \�.e.9 a.-r � t N ,-'- •o Ps `n 'tar l •�.. ". • ( - _ � � to �� , �0 3 I `\ 1'7��5 _ ^-I •.c • dam ice'' '�ra�nR9e�t..,�._ � ` ---1 c Q o - � - "•= to I SGZ r• a 9�} Ohsr �� S " S2 r� ICD 7 v I -- I lr- >— v 1-1�-- - 4 �7 �> c t t,� �� 1 S GGIZ 217 )S�>rG '^� ) ---9y"'t ~`•_'tt _�. to� I I �Y� 10 theObert S E P U 1982 dall CITY OF I1GARD company PLANNING DEPT. Kristin Square O 9500 S.W.Barbur Blvd. • Suite 300• Portland,Oregon 97219• (503) 245-1131 Telex #360557 I September 16, 1982 Mayor Wilbur Bishop and Members of the City Council Chairman Frank Terpedinno and Members of the Planning Commission c/o Mr. William Monahan, Planning Director City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: RC-809 - Tigard Triangle Property Tax Lot 2200, Map 1S1 36CD Gentlemen: As you know The Robert Randall Company has recently submitted an application to the Boundary Commission for the annexation of the 6 acre parcel located at 11722 S.W. Pacific Highway to the City of Tigard. The completion of this annexation will result in bringing this final key undeveloped piece of land in the Tigard Triangle into the City. We know the City is now fully involved in developing its comprehensive plan, an effort we support because when a well thought out and flexible land use plan exists in a community it enhances the opportunity for private endeavor to successfully bring economic development to that community. So it is important to inform you of what plan designation and zoning we feel should be applied to this property. We think that a consensus clearly exists among all the parties involved in the development of a plan for the Triangle, that its prime assets are accessibility, visibility and flexibility. The accessibility, of course, is produced by its location between major highways. The properties in the area are visible either from 217 or Highway 99. The reserve of undeveloped land in the area produces the flexibility that would be so attractive to a variety of potential users of the site. Mr. William Monahan September 16, 1982 Page 2 Recently, we have been involved in negotiations with a major insurance company seeking to develop their regional headquarters in this area. Unfortunately because of the uncertainty regarding Tigard's comprehensive plan for the Triangle, particularly the apparent controversy regarding the area's transportation plan, they were unable to consider this site as a potential location. However, we think that several of the insurance company's needs and desires should be kept in mind as you finalize the planning and zoning for this area. Their number one priority in the selection of a location for such a project, is it's close, within walking distance preferably, proximity to restaurants, banks and office support commercial facilities. For this reason we believe that a zoning designation for the front portion of our property, within approximately 200 feet of Pacific Highway, which permits the independent development of these facilities would be appropriate as a logical continuation of the current type of development along Highway 99. It would also bean enticement to prime tenants for an office park and light industrial development which could potentially be developed in the rest of the area. Our opinion is that on land up to a distance of 600 feet from Pacific Highway an office commercial use should be emphasized. Beyond that t distance from the highway we feel the constraints of topography, particularly the drainage situation, indicates a light industrial land use would be best, considering the cost of development given these constraints. We have seen preliminary plans which indicate an Industrial Park designation is being considered for our property. We do not oppose such a designation for the area since each of the uses we envision for the area is permitted under such a designation. However, we would oppose such a designation if it resulted in a limitation on the independent development of any of those uses. We definitely fell that flexibility, the right to independently develop each seperate use, is essential to the economic success of the Triangle's development. E For the same reason we are concerned about proposals being made by some parties that any development of the area would be contingent on the complete construction of a major transportation network in the Triangle. We support the development of a plan providing for r this transportation network and we have understood the NPO plan for this area was the ultimate general guide for the transportation system. l E Mr. William Monahan September 16, 1982 Page 3 i f However, the 11P0 plan makes it clear it was not intended to be a constraint on the :individual development of property prior to the construction of the system if access to the development and any one of the major roads, particularly Pacific Highway, could be made safe and functional. Considering the variety of ownerships } and land use situations existing in the Triangle, we think the o retention of such a policy is the only logical course. Each project should be ssbject to review on this standard as- well as on its fulfilling obligations to the development of the over-all transportation i system. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to share our views on this matter with,-.you and your consideration of them. { q/ery truly yours, a John T. Gibbon Secretary/Counsel i cc - Doug Seely Steve Janik JTG/tu E i t Elma E. Palmer 9320 SW O'Mara St. I� Tigard, OR 97223 / 3— i -� � `r /?�-cam• � /• �� / /-.�--�- � o rf U �'�y Lc-� �` �'`-c' Y= ��c:� vim— ,�'✓.fLL� - / l Gam- i P E T I T I O N c �Ar� "�� TO: Planning Staff . Planning Commission \�\ and the City Council City of 7ogard , Oregon SUBJECT: Plea for retention by Tigard City Council of R-7 zoning on land on O'Mara Street , delineated herein. We, the undersigned petioners , hereby implore the City of Tigard governing bodies to adhere to and abide by officially approved NPO #1 , Policy 6. The traffic flow on O' Mara and Frewi ' ng Streets and Ash Avenue is already heavy enough without exposing these streets to a potential of 200 Multi-Family units comprising 2-story apartments , etc . Further, to change the zoning to a higher desity would- adversely affect and devaluate adjacent prop- erties. More on our objections is set forth below. Each of the petitioners herein as.'-- for ample advance notice of any meeting to be held by the Tigard Planning Commission and/or City Council for the purpose of deciding this matter. C i i i r:i 1 r J i�. G ro lJC9��41JC�7 �T, In the next few ncnths Tigard will adopt a new comcrehensive pl�� as i nand«+ed '=J L"D-". As rant c`.' t'-�-- ti-e_re be a new zone plan. The above shaded aro i roposed to be changed f=m '1o�sino units per -.cre to 12 units per acre. We, the undersigned, are opposed to this zoning change for the following reasons: 1) We feel that multiply family dwellings in this area would not be in keeping with the rugal atsmosphere• of the surrounding neighbor- 2) hood;- The increase in traffic would greatly tax the existing roads of this area; ` 3) Existing utilities are inadequate to properly serve multiple family dwellings in this area; i. 4) We feel that rezoning the above area would be out of character s with the rest of the new comprehensive plan. t b 20 -It S 28 9190 O`MCLY-aL ---- - � 1..:i.1�. i (-i .�� ' ) _ _ (--��.- / .•L/" J LTJ ' / � 1 Uk Z/I. 31 S, S KE'�ST'. Vie--�- C- �y - i= =� ;• �;,� �� 'iii �� r, /{/ � J �. - ..� _ /. /�5,.y�l=i:�-�i _..•IGC.�C. rt -� - --- --- 6 ZO_S 7/e, S cam'• C�-` ', ----t /"".�.`'�.'� —�•3'ti�"`"}� l:.% >�� - /C. 7 7 �� `' �j�•.. Lo.h�Z._ j t"• 1_��a.•�c�_ _ December 1, 1952 Mr. John Butler, Chairperson NOV � 0 -1982Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 1 Tigard, Oregon, 97223. CITY OF TIGAKD Dear Mr. Butler: PLANNING DEPT. We understand that the Tigard Planning Staff is recommending a zone change to R-7 for the Omara Farm Area with a medium density classification on the Tigard Map. That area and all the surround- ing area is now all low density single family residential. If the zoning is changed from low density to medium density, a contractor could oome along and request a change from R-7 (seven units per acre) to twelve units per acre which is allowed in medium density. A maxium density of 12 units per acre would be apartments and/or other multi-family dwellings. The residents in this area bought their homes here because the area was zoned low density single family residential and a change to medium density-which allows a maxium of 12 units per acre instead of 5 units per acre which is the maxium allowed in low density would betray all the home owners that bought in this area. These homes were purchased in this area with the understand- ing that this area was low density single family residential because it was zoned that way. If a zone change to medium density 7 allowed, it would ruin the character and livability of this and t„e surrounding neighborhoods. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan Book, page 33, Policy No. 6.3.1 says= Designating on the Plan Map those portions of the city committed to Residential development and within the "established areas-, new development will be of the same type and density in order to protect the character of existing neighborhoods. . In closing, how would you feel if you bought a home because you wanted to be in a low density single family residential area with the City Map showing the surrounding area zoned for low density and then along comes a zone change to more than twice the density that it eras zoned for originally. Please keep zoning.-. at low density with a maxium of 5 units per acre,: which is only two less than R-7 which the Tigard Planning Staff is requesting. We need to preserve the character, quality and livability of our sin le family residential neighborhoods. Please keep Low Density. Thank you very much for your time and consideration, Sincerely, ��- ;��rr C/_- Copyi Paul and Gloria Johnson of Jeremy ward Planning Staff City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon, 97223. n . 1 L/ TO: Members of the City Council FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Planning and Development DATE : December 10, 1982 RE: Comprehensive Plan Schedule Attached is a proposed calendar of meeting for the comprehensive planning process. The elements and maps proposed for consideration at each meeting are as follows : DATE COMMITTEE/COUNCIL AREAS OF CONCERN 12/11/82 Planning Commission Public Facilities & Services 12/13/82 City Council Energy Air , Water , Land Resources Quality Economy 12/15/82 City Council Elements continued from 12/13/82 Public Facilities & :services 12/16/82 CCI Finding, Policies , Implemen- tation Strategies Natural Features & Open Space Transportation 1/6/83 CCI Housing Urbanization 1/13/83 CC Findings , Policies , Implemen- tation Strategies Comprehensive Plan Map Official Development District & Map 1/18/83 Planning Commission Natural Features & Open Space Transporation 1/20/83 Planning Commission Housing Urbanization 1/22/83 Planning Commission Findings , Policies, Implemen- tation Strategies Comprehesnive Plan Map Official Development District & Map 1/24/83 City Council Natural Features & Open Space Transporation 1/25/83 City Council Housing Urbanization Comprehensive Plan Schedule PAGE. 2 DATE. COMMITTEE/COUNCIL AREAS OF CONCERN 1/26/83 City Council Findings, Policies, Implemen- tation Strategies Comprehensive Plan Map Official Development District & Map 1/29/83 City Council Workshop (tentative) 1/31/83 City Council Second reading of Comprehensive Plan and Edit Changes STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommends that the City Council approve the calendar for the Comprehensive Plan consideration. December 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Jean, City Administrator Gsi� SUBJECT: Police Officer Compensation Report Attached are the total compensation charts we previously discussed showing our Police Officer talary and benefits compared with other comparable cities of 10,000 - 30,000 in our area. You will notice that after all other jurisdictions current wage agreements were settled for fiscal year 82-83, we were already at the average of comparable cities in fiscal year 81-824 Two policy issues present themselves as we proceed into fiscal year 82-83 without a contract settlement: compensation policy and budget implications. As to compensation policy. I believe that the City cannot afford financially to be a compensation leader in the area, nor can we afford in turnover and productivity to be among the least paid. I recommend that the Council consider an average or median total compensation policy in determining its wage and benefit settlements. The City is currently #6 in compensation and population. Budgetarily, anything over 3% in January will require the layoff of one Police (J Officer. A 3% or greater settlement delayed until March will require the layoff of two officers to keep the budget in balance. we are still proceeding with our negotiations with the Police union, but unless something is settled in the next month, I will have to ask you to act according to your wage policy and exercise your budget options in January. BJ:lw Attachments: 2 (0333A) 0 0 Q1 0 Q o DCl G�IrtiG�AGf E£. T�1oe�zo (6 a ® ®CPA. �i v-r..A a�C3i`JE e � 2 � �/ZF-S fl��r� Q s sPa e Seo: Q G��S-r- �� . SPD • SPO v� E (8a-73) �1 F f • O ' 1 y Tal-All( Cr1�r C_ 3. 17 900 1 i i I I-' - •---.- ------. . _ _- - -- - 17 6_ �� 17 9 I ---- - i 12 -300 - �4OGi40ocvc�vl. 7 15.--- 90.x16 . �— 21 00 713 ----- --- ------ IIiI ; IT I 240O , I ------ -----� .— - -------------F-- - - - -- 25 I -:16 - - - �- - - - -Q2�QZ9` S 0 X70 7 29 V/G_��Y'N�__(P��,./.L _..�. - ----��l�-� ..__ /V O�� .-- - +-� :._.__i_ ._ .�QO J• ! 28 30 33 9 0 0 31 2�s - 33, /y)��/�� r��9-_•-- 1, /sem l ! �oar� /� 36 37 l2 39 40 41 -y� _Ts��_6 P azJ2- 3 °7Q RIP 43` ll' / .3 45 I 44 - - - 46�.� 47 f t City of Tigard Advisory TURA Vote Counted 12/10/82 - 2:00 PM City Hall, Administrator 's Office Counters: Dori Rickert Penny Liebertz Question: Should tax increment funds be used for the Downtown Renewal District? YES Votes 629 39, �3 7 NO Votes 756 2. 3 b �� - -- ILlegibTe or Unsigned 202_ - I� �y — - -- — TOTAL VOTES CAST 1587 I certify that the votes recorded on this abstract correctly summarize the tally of votes cast at the advisory election indicated. Dori Rickert Penny_ Li be z Doris Hart g L l December 13, 1982 Tigard Planning Department 12420 S. W. Main St. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: TEMPORARY USE APPLICATION & PERi•SIT Gentlemen: For the past several years our service club has operated a Christmas tree lot during the Yule season. Prior to this year we situated the lot next to Sambo's Restaurant, but the sale of the lot and its development has ended our use of that site. With the consent of the owner of the Burger Boy Drive-In Restaurant, Mr. John Alexander, we were able to set up our tree lot in his business's park.L: g lot which is West of the restaurant. He is located at 11688 S. W. Pacific Hwy. We generally operate for 2 - 3 weeks on this fund-raising project. The monies raised. after expenses, are used principally for programs aimed at the Youth of our community. We are a registered non-profit organization. While we are able to pay the $50.00 fee to the City of Tigard, we feel it is somewhat unfair to be assessed a fee for trying to raise funds that are used for the betterment of our community. Any consideration that you can give to our club will be appreciated. Enclosed herewith is the necessary application form and check for the required fee. Sincerely, teven C. Ogden, Board Member - Terrific Tigard Kiwanis 620-2451 or 231-5214 enclosures C EmEd MARK O.HATFIELD / OREGON - ;.'�' 1 " Coif eb Zictf ez Zenaf a WASHINGTON.D.C. =510 November 22, 1982 "The Second Time Around" proved to be a real pleasing event for me and I was so happy that finally I could fulfill this commitment that earlier had been postponed. For many years I �iave watched the growth around the Tigard area -pith pleasure and a bit of dismay at the rapidity of it. Many people are coming to know what has been general knowledge with us for a long time. That is a terrific place to live! Many, many thanks to you and to all who helped make this meeting one I will remember for many reasons. Good company in pleasant surroundings all united to make this pure enjoyment and I wish Tigard many more progressive birthdays. f Stay well and I do hope our paths will cross again one day soon. Sincerely, The Honorable Wilbur A. Bishop 10590 S. W. Cook Lane Tigard, Oregon 97223 Poo k7 December 7, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Ccuncil & Budget Committee FROM: Doris Hartig SUBJECT: League of Oregon Cities Newly Elected Officials' Workshops The attached papers from the League of Oregon Cities are for your information. Please contact Dori Rickert for registration. l League f Ore n Cities ` { DEC Z88P SALEM: Local Government Center, 1201 Court Street N.E., P.O. Box 928, Salem 97308, Telephone: (503)588-6466 EUGENE: Hendricks Hall, University of Oregon, P.O. Box 3177, Eugene 97403, Telephone:(503)686-5232 Salem, Oregon December 3, 1982 x To: City Managers and City Recorders i s Subject: Newly Elected Officials' Workshops i The League will be holding its biennial workshops for newly-elected officials from January 15 to February 12, 1983. The workshops will be held in Lake Oswego, Albany, s Eugene Grants Pass Redmond, Pendleton and Baker. The purpose of the seven regional z workshops is to acquaint new city officials with the structure and particular needs of city government , with services of the League and various state agencies , and with } other subjects of concern to municipal government. in conjunction with the newly-elected officials' workshops , a special half-day train- ing session on good budgeting practices will be held in the same locations. The ses- sions will be designed for city budget officers, citizen members of the budget com- mittee. They will focus on the role of the budget officer and the budget committee and basic principles and practices of sound city budgeting. We are asking for your help in coordinating registration for members of your city who j plan to attend the workshops. Enclosed for your information is a letter of invita- tion , which has been mailed to your city's mayor, and several copies of the program agenda and the schedule of workshops. We would appreciate your assistance in notify- t ing newly-elected officials , as well as new planning and budget commission members , of the workshop schedule and agenda. Although the workshops are directed toward new city officials , other city officials and staff members may find the information valu- able as well and should also be encouraged to attend. Enclosed is an advance registration form, which needs to be filled out and returned to l the League office by the Monday prior to the meeting your city officials wish to attend; the registration deadline for each meeting is indicated on the form. This will enable us to order lunch and prepare enough handouts for all city officials who attend. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Thank you again for your assistance. . Sincerely, Stephen C. Bauer Executive Director SCB:bas Enclosures i a OFFICERS: Mayor Jack R. Nc%m, 80evwtOn. president • DIRECTORS:Mayor Alm Berg,Corvallis• Mayor Dale Couftney,Millon-Freermlar a Hleyor 6vern fW,Nevrbsrg• Msyor AI Gerald"Lou"Mannum.coundirnomber.Medford,vk president• Hatton.Lincoln City• Mayor R.A."Gus"Kellar,Eugene,immediate Pact president• Milas LindDwp,eomminwioner,Portland• r Ruth Burleigh, coundlmember. Bend, nese rar o Stephan C. Mayor John Lundell,The Dallas•Robert L.MCWiliiams,dty manewor,Redmond•Swndra J.Rennie,councilrnember,Sprin0old w Barer,easrvrtivs director. Jim Watson,city mora gor,Klamath Falls. 1 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES 1983 NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS' IORKSIiOP TENTATIVE PROGRAM 9:00 a.m. Registration ($5.00 fee includes lunch) 10:00 a.m. Welcome and Introduction 10:15 - 10:45 a .m. The Legal Framework of City Government 10.45 - 11 .15 a.m. Basic City Services 11 : 15 - 11 :45 a .m. Conflict of Interest and Open Meetings Law 11 :45 a.m.-12:15 p.m. Legislative Issues and Intergovernmental Relations 12:15 - 12:45 p.m. Lunch (An informal lunch will be served) 12:45 - 2:00 p.m. Training: The Effective Board Member Immediately following lunch, city officials will participate in a brief training session designed to help city council and commission members learn the necessary skills for good boardsmanship. 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. Financial Management 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. Land Use Planning 3:00 - 3:30 P.m. Personnel 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. Questions and Answers CONCURRENT AFTERNOON PROGRAM 2.00 - 4.00 p.m. Good Budgeting Practices This training workshop will focus on the role of the budget officer and budget committee and basic techniques of sound city budgeting. It is especially designed for city budget officers and citizen budget committee members. The format will include a presentation based on League- prepared material , to be followed by group discussion. i t **The order of the topica may change slightly from city to city. f SCHEDULE i LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES 1983 NEWLY-ELECTED OFFICIALS' WORKSHOPS Date- Location Saturday,�an� 15 Lake Oswego--Adult Community Center, 505 G Avenue Saturday, January 15 Albany--Council Chambers, City Hall , 240 West 2nd Friday, January 28 Eugene--Council Chambers , City Hall , 777 Pearl St. Saturday, January 29 Grants Pass--Council Chambers, City Hall , 101 N.W. "A" Street Saturday, January 29 Redmond--Council Chambers, City Hall , 455 S. 7th Friday, February 11 Pendleton--Council Chambers, City Hall , 34 S.E. Dorion Saturday, February 12 Baker--Kopper Kitchen, 480 Campbell i s i z a S ( E I TIGARD CITIZENS DEDICATED TO PLANNING AND DECORATING THE CITY'S HOLIDAY SEASONS• P.O. BOX 230330•TIGARD.OR 9723 ®• ® let there be LIGHT committee .0 00 ®®®� ® a 0 060 10 0 YOU'RE INVITED TO JOIN US FOR THE FIRST ANNUAL TIGARD CAROLING EVENT & COMMUNITY SING THURSDAY, DEC. 16 WATCH FOR OUR CAROLING GROUPS WHO WILL BE SINGING THROUGHOUT TIGARD NEIGHBORHOODS FROM 6 : 30 -7 : 30 P.M. - IF YOU MUST DRIVE, PLEASE USE EXTRA CAUTION. - IF YOU HAVE CANNED FOOD OR REPAIRABLE TOYS TO DONATE TO TIGARD ' S NEEDY FAMILIES , OUR CAROLERS WILL BE HAPPY TO ACCEPT YOUR GIFT. THE CHRISTMAS CAROL The traditional Christmas carol -- with its simple tune and light-hearted joviality -- has been with us since the fifteenth century . Enjoyed by rich and poor, old and young, carols became popular as a joyous celebra- tion of Christ ' s birth and, at one time, were danced as well as sung. JOIN US AT 8 :00 P .M. AT THE COMMUNITY TREE IN THE ALBERTSON ' S/ PAYLESS PARKING LOT FOR AN OLD-FASHIONED COMMUNITY SING. * SING ALONG WITH MORE THAN 100 CAROLERS. * SEE SANTA ARRIVE IN A POLICE CAR. * BRING YOUR CANNED FOOD OR REPAIRABLE TOYS ; COLLECTION AGENCIES WILL BE ON HAND. ` HAVE A JOYOUS HOLIDAY SEASON SEE YOU ON THE 16TH For more information, phone Anita Edin, 639-9406 F r DECEMBER 10, 1982 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that a special Council meeting, called by the Mayor with the connom consent of the Council, will be held on 12/ 12/82 at 9:30 A.M. , in Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash Avenue, Tigard, Oregon. The meeting is called for the purpose of holding a Council workshop/retreat. I S/Wilbur A. Bishop Mayor, City of Tigard 4 1 I G A R D C 1 TY C 0 U N C I L STUDY SESSION WORKSHOP MINUTES - DECEMBER 12, 1982 - 9:45 A.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present : Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors 'lom Brian, John Cook, Nancie Stimler ; City Administrator, Bob Jean ; Helen 'lerry ; Dave Baker, Tigard Times ; and Geraldine Ball. 2. Helen Terry, Consultant RE. Agenda - Discussion A. Working Relationships B. Groundrules C. Goals & Priorities D. Other - Labor Relations Ex. Session Handout and Citizen Questionnaire Report Discussion of workshop topics and need for follow-up in January or February. . . Jan. 31, 1983, 7:00 P.M. at City Hall on 5th Monday. . . topics for then: Department Heads, Labor Relations Policy, Salary and Compensation Policy, Conducting Effective Council Meetings, Finance (5-Year Plan) . 3. GROUNDRULES - Discussion (New Year's Resolutions) A. Communications Y - w/City Administrator Communication 's requires 2-way = - w/Key Staff effort. . . need to equally inform all - w/each other as Council Council Members. . .City Administrator e - w/community/public still needs to meet frequently 1-2 times/month with each Council > member, if Council member also cooperates. . . "Open Agenda" groundrules? Community and Council frustration? Value of quick decision vs. table and set on later agenda? Need a handout sheet as to groundrules of public meetings. Need time clock? Perhaps add to Consent Agenda? Delegation of authority on more routine items? Colored i flyer for handout sheet? B. "Plops" - staff Move to Table if not understood, rather - public than forced Yes or No. - Council Try to limit add ons to Open Agenda. C. Others - Public Harrassment - fake "shots" privately or at end of meeting - Hidden agendas - Fishing expeditions - "Rank Has Its Privileges". Council Member vs. Private Citizen - Press/Media Relations vs. "Whipsaw"? Select controversy vs. reporting accomplishments. Press releases internally circulated to inform staff and CC of "official position." CA should release, not Department Heads. Oregonian relationship on reporting and agendas has slipped. Page 1 - Council Minutes - December 12, 1982 Rag Need to help new Council member get up to speed and have briefings by staff on full range of issues. Information that "affects" the Council should go to Council. How it 's done may be improved, but needs to be done. Information requested by or about "spouses" by definition do affect Council. City Administrator is to decide on "grey area" information and when in doubt should forward information. Prefer too much information vs. too little. Perhaps send information apart from packet or sealed separately in envelope to Council. Agenda cycle discussed. . Include cut-off dates on Fact Sheet. . . Tentative agendas quarterly to Council on colored paper. "Safe" votes and "No" votes. "Safe" vote groundrule OK. But need to articulate reason for "No" votes or minority opinion of any kind. Qualified votes on part of entire document or procedural items after policy issue is decided should be used to keep portion clear, yet move system. 4. GOALS - DISCUSSION OF GOALS & PRIORITIES CA checked ( ) items requiring ongoing emphasis this coming year. Council discussed continuing emphasis (--) or new items ; - Annual Goal Review Workshop, need to retain emphasis until routine and until Council working relationship stabilizes. . .Consider annual Workshop in early October or November after election. . . then follow-up meeting in January on working relationship. . .Need to attack problem, not person. - Communications in P.D. -- Repeater station. . . - Council Iraining and Working Relationships - Community Meeting Rules Fact Sheet 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS: Mayor - communications today was beneficial, but limited without Ima and Ken. Think session on personal relationship only would be good. Bob Jean - feel good with discussions today, look forward to Ken and Ima being present on 1/31/83. . .Concerned with Ima's lack of information on Finance and Budget. John Cook - likes idea of working relationships meeting, non-business , without City Administrator and without Attorney but with Helen Ierry. . .After 1/31/83 meeting. . . Tom Brian - frustrated with limits on meeting without Ken or Ima present. . .Groundrules update OK. . .Goals and Priorities OK. . .Working relationships need work. . . Page 2 - Council Minutes - December 12, 1982 1 Nancie Stimler - frustrated with Ken and Ima not present. . .would have been good learning experience for Ima. . .concerned with Ken' s frustration lately and don' t know why it 's there. 6. Recess Study Session Workshop 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council, went into executive session under ORS 192.660 (1) (e) and (1)(f) to discuss Labor Relations. 8. Adjourn Study Session Workshop at 3:40 P.M. 2 W Q,— Bob Jean, ity Administrator ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard (0398A) Page - Council Minutes - December 12, 1982 E January 20, 1983 GOALS AND PRIORITIES (✓) PROGRESSING, BUT STILL NEEDS EMPHASIS. . . COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 4.5 .,'Council and Advisory Board Relationships 4.5 .-Labor Relations ✓Annual Goal Review Workshop (until routine) ✓Classifi_cation and Compensation Policy .-'Management System Organization Productivity Accountability 4_0 ✓Overtime Budget Workshop ✓Purchasing Cost Consciousness Fees and Charges Taxes 4.0 ✓Civic Center Personnel System ✓Coals, Work Programs and Merit System Labor Negotiators .,Policy Options and Analysis 3.5 'Total Compensation Policy ✓Service Levels ✓Volunteerism -/Capital Improvement Plan Intragovernmental (Internal) Communications *"Contingency Reserve Council Training Vacation Policy Meeting Rules Fact Sheet Finances 3.5 ✓Philosophy of Government 3.0 Debt Management Pacific Highway Computers and EDP Technology Newsletter Code Change Audit Press and Media Relations Financial Analysis Contracting Oeit LIBRARY 3.0 ✓Community Relations 4.5 ✓Comparison With Other Cities Intergovernmental Coordination 4.0 ✓Space Needs Appropriate Technology Council and Board Relations 2.5 City Attorney 3.5 Growth Impact Purchasing 3.0 ✓Cable TV Pride in Library Library Services Hours of Operation 2.5 Municipal Reference Library Visibility t, 2.0 Social/Cultural/Arts L—,LMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC SAFETY 4.5 veComprehensive Plan Versus NPO Plans 4.5 ,,-Union Contract Density Police Department Lmage Targeted Police Services 4.0 ,Downtown Revitalization --Street/Arterial System 4_0 ✓ICAP .,,Sewer System ✓Police Department Space Needs ✓Park Plan ✓Crime Prevention & Community Relations ✓Parks Coordination with Law Enforcement ✓Industrial Development Agencies ✓Community Involvement Police Staffing and Growth Impact Code Enforcement Dispatching Growth Management Coordination Tracy Report Versus Chief's Response Fleet Management Safety Valve Municipal Judge 3.5 ✓Pedestrian Ways/Bikeways Police Radio Transmitter ✓Public Facilities Planning within Urban Growth Bounds 3.5 Public Safety Resource ✓Cable Communications/Cable TV School District Coordination ✓Local Improvement Districts (LTD's) Police Reporting .,Economic Development Expanding Role of Police Department VCapital Improvement Plan and Program Alarm Response Planning Director Equipment Replacement Policy Street Lighting Policy Alternatives r. Traffic Signs and Signals Computers and EDP Technology Sign Code Report Writing Building Department Municipal Court Street Light Outages and Traffic Municipal Court Versus District Court Light Malfunctions Citings Beautification 3.0 Fire Districts Coordination 3.0 ,Recreation iaght Bard ✓Evaluate Feasibility/Desirability of Three Water Districts in Tigard's 2.5 Tri-Met Coordination UCB Becoming City Department 2.0✓Evaluate Feasibility/Desirability of: ✓Senior Center Building Height Limits Tigard Fire Department Chamber of Commerce Community Develop. Block Grant (CDBG) Engineering Cook Park Planning Commission Minutes Main Street Parking Added by the Park Board only: -*'Greenway Development and Acquisition *-Park Development and .Acquisition 2.5 Janitorial Services {