The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 12/06/1982 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign their name on the DECEMBER 6, 1982, 7:30 P.M. appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is p FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL provided, ask to be recognized by the Chair. LECTURE ROOM 1. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda 2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 2.1 Approve Minutes - November 15 & 22, 1982 2.2 Approve Resolution No. 82-135 Accepting Tech Center Business Park Improvements 2.3 Canvass Vote - 11/2/82 General Election 2.4 Approve Joint Purchase of Police Vehicles With City of Beaverton 2.5 Approve OLCC Application for Bus Stop Deli - 10240 SW Nimbus, L-4, Tigard RMB Application 2.6 Approve Wreckers License for 11572 SW Barbur Blvd. and Authorize Mayor's Signature 2.7 Receive and File Written Communications: o From Loyola Encounter, Inc. re: World Marriage Day o From Portland State University re: 7-1-82 Population ' o From Martha Bishop re: Accessory Buildings o From City of Portland re: Approval of Water Extension 3-25-83 2.8 Receive and File Report on NPO Status 2.9 Approve Resolution No. 82-136 Adopting Final Order - Sunnyside Estates 2.10 Approve Resolution No. 82-137 Ratifying Appointment to Park Board 2.11 Approve SDC Refund - Floberg 3. FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS o City Administrator 4. WES &ZLENBECK - Discuss Washington County/City Relations 5. FINANCE AND RECORDS/MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL DEPARTMENTAL REPORT o Finance Director/City Recorder 6. BUDGET COMMITTEE/CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING 7. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council and Budget Committee will go into Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (1)(d) to discuss labor negotiations. 9. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 6, 1982 T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L i SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 - 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian (left at 10:45 P.M.), John Cook, Nancie Stimler, and Kenneth Scheckla (left at 11:12 P.M. ) ; Director of Public Works, Frank Currie; Finance Director/City Recorder, Doris Hartig (left . 10:15 Y P.M.) ; City Administrator, Bob Jean; Director of Planning & Development, William Monahan (arrived at 10:15 P.M. left at 10:17 P.M.) ; Legal Counsel, Ed Sullivan; Deputy City Recorder, Loreen Wilson; Budget Committee Members Present: Chairman James Smith, Committee Members Wally Hoffman and Dale Evans (Budget Committee left at 11:20 P.M.). 2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL & AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) City Administrator requested that the following items be added to open agenda: .1 WATER COMMITTEE UPDATE .2 TURA POLL .3 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS/LA MANCHA ESTATES .4 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS/CROW PARK 217 .5 REQUEST BY FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA (SHERWOOD) FOR WAIVER OF TU PERMIT FEE .6 COUNCIL RETREAT DEVELOPMENTS (b) Councilor Scheckla requested the following items also be placed on Open Agenda. .7 ILLEGAL SIGNS REPORT .8 MARTA FRANK RESPONSE BY STAFF (c) Mayor Bishop added the following item to Open Agenda. .9 COMMENTS ON FEDERAL GAS TAX (d) COMP PLAN EXTENSION REQUEST. City Administrator reported that staff has received numerous requests to extend the consideration of the Comp Plan to give additional time to the NPOs and CCI to consider the issues. He recommended Council extend the time 45 days due to the Christmas season and stated that this would allow more time for input from NPOs and CCI. The following people spoke and requested Council allow more time for the Comp Plan consideration: Bob Bledsoe, NPO #3, submitted letter Nancy Robbins, NPO #7, submitted letter Phil Pasteris, NPO #6, submitted letter Gordon Martin, NPO #4, submitted letter PAGE 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 After further discussion, Councilor Cook moved to follow staff recommendation with the following timeline for Comp Plan adoption. Motion seconded by Councilor Brian. 0 12/7, 12/9, & 12/11 -- Planning Commission Hearings 0 12/13, 12/14, & 12/15 -- City Council Hearings o Week of 12/13/82 -- NPO & CCI Meetings o Week of 12/20/82 -- NPO & CCI Meetings ( o Week of 1/3/83 -- NPO & CCI Meetings o Week of 1/10/83 -- NPO & CCI Meetings 0 1/18 & 1/20/83 -- Planning Commission Hearings 0 1/24, 1,/25, & 1/26/83 -- City Council Hearings Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council. 3. APPROVE MINUTES - NOVEMBER 15 & 22, 1982 (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 82-135 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN TECH CENTER i BUSINESS PARK SUBJECT TO HEREIN SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. ; (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 5. CANVASS OF THE VOTES - NOVEMBER 2, 1982 ELECTION (See attached list) (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. E Approved by unanimous vote of Council. i 6. APPROVE JOINT PURCHASE OF POLICE VEHICLES WITH CITY OF BEAVERTON (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. E F Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 7. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION FOR BUS STOP DELI - 10240 SW NIMBUS, L-4, TIGARD RMB APPLICATION (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to remove from consent agenda and consider when Director of Planning & Development is available for comment. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. I { PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 i 5 8. APPROVE WRECKERS LICENSE FOR 11572 SW BARBUR BLVD. AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE. E (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve and authorize signature. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 9. RECEIVE AND FILE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: ` o From Loyola Encounter, Inc. re: World Marriage Day o From Portland State University re: 7-1-82 Population o From Martha Bishop re: Accessory Buildings o From City of Portland re: Approval of Water Extension 3-25-83 i (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to receive and file. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10. RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT ON NPO STATUS (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to receive and file. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. x 11. RESOLUTION NO. 82-136 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER UPON COUNCIL REVIEW OF ITEMS S 4-82 AND ZC 12-82, AS PETITIONED BY THE ROBERT RANDALL COMPANY, APPLICANT. t (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. t C i 12. RESOLUTION NO. 82-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT TO THE TIGARD PARK BOARD. (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 13. APPROVE SDC REFUND - FLOBERG (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to approve refund in the amount of $3,427.00 to Lasal Land Company of the N.W. on SDC payment. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 14. WES MYLENBECK - Washington County/City Relations (a) Mr. Wes Mylenbeck, Chairman Elect of the County Commissioners appeared to expressed his concern regarding the lack of intergovernmental relationships and cooperation especially between Washington County and the cities. (b) Council expressed their appreciation to Mr. Mylenbeck for his concern ( and noted they are anxious to discuss this topic in the future. 15. FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (a) City Administrator submitted report of mid-year 1982-83 budget revisions, or control budget, which he has implemented. He noted that overall revenues are down 2% with General Fund revenues being down a total of 4.5%. (b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to accept report. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 16. FINANCE AND RECORDS/MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL DEPARTMENTAL REPORT (a) Finance Director/City Recorder introduced department presenting some statistics on the department and described Finance Director/City Recorder duties and functions. (b) Records Manager/Municipal Court Clerk, Billie Rawlings, discussed her Section's performance over the last year and introduced Judge Anthony Pelay, Jr. The Judge noted his concerns regarding space allocation for Court sessions. r // (c) Office Manager/Deputy City Recorder, Loreen Wilson, presented various � t statistics and information on Word Processing and the Support Services Division. t (d) Accounting Manager, Mary Strickland, advised Council of the tasks performed in the Accounting Division and discussed some areas of concern regarding financial reporting. I f RECESS: 10:00 P.M. { RECONVENE: 10:15 P.M. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ARRIVED: 10:15 P.M. FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY RECORDER LEFT: 10:15 P.M. 17. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION FOR BUS STOP DELI - 10240 SW Nimbus, L-4, Tigard, RMB Application (a) Director of Planning and Development stated that the Planning Department normally checks the zoning for these applications, however, without the files before him, he would be unable to verify that this application was okay to approve. PAGE 4 -- COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 { i C (b) 'Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve the OLCC license application upon verification by the Planning Department of proper zoning designation. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. t DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT LEFT: 10:17 P.M. i f 18. BUDGET COMMITTEE/CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING (a) City Administrator presented tentative budget calendar noting levy request to voters in fu=el,. /t' 4j , z- COUNCILOR BRIAN LEFT: 10:45 P.M. (b) Discussion followed regarding the policy for City Council for filing travel and subsistence expenses each month. After lengthy discussion, Consensus of Council was to have City Administrator and Legal Counsel prepare resolution stating the reimbursement for expenses for costs other than meeting attendance shall be at the discretion of Council members. RECESS SPECIAL MEETING: 10:54 P.M. i z. E 19. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council and Budget Committee went into Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (1)(d) and (1)(e) to discuss labor negotiations and possible land acquisition. f COUNCILOR SCHECKLA LEFT DURING EXECUTIVE SESSION: 11:12 P.M. RECONVENE SPECIAL MEETING: 11:29 P.M. 20. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 20.1 WATER COMMITTEE UPDATE - City Administrator stated this would be considered at the December 13th meeting. 20.2 TURA POLL - City Administrator reported that staff will be tallying poll on Friday, December 10, 1982. 20.3 RESOLUTION NO. 82-138 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN LA MANCHA ESTATES SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO HEREIN SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 20.4 RESOLUTION NO. 82-133 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN CROW PARK 217 SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO HEREIN SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. Motion by Councilor Cook seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 X4.5' REQUEST BY SHERWOOD HIGH FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOR WAIVER OF TU PERMIT FEE - City Administrator reported they were requesting the fee waiver for christmas tree sales. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve waiver of TU permit fee. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 20.6 COUNCIL RETREAT DEVELOPMENTS - City Administrator requested Council's pleasure on what date to hold the retreat. Consensus of Council was to hold meeting on December 12, 1982 from 9:30 A.M. to 3:30 P.M. 20.7 ILLEGAL SIGNS REPORT - City Administrator stated he would submit a written report shortly on this issue. 20.8 MARTA FRANK RESPONSE BY STAFF - As Councilor Scheckla had left the meeting, Council requested this item not be considered at this time. 20.9 COMMENTS ON FEDERAL GAS -AX - Mayor Bishop requested staff advised Council of amount of Federal Gas Tax to be received and wished to discuss at a later date the use of these monies. 20.10 SABRE CONSTRUCTION LAND AQUISITION PAYMENT - Director of Public Works requested payment in the amount of $17,467 to Sabre Construction for right-of-way acquisition for 72nd Avenue LID. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to pay $17,467. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 20.11 JB BISHOP - PIETRO'S EASEMENT - Consensus of Council was to consider item under consent agenda at the 12-13-82 meeting. 21. ADJOURNMENT: 11:45 P.M. (�../C,.1�6LO4✓ DeputCity Recorder City of Tigard ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 6, 1982 AAR . -!,ti�!+:q��5•<;, 4.y:CC�yWdtd.'iM+rt++i?99vewr.':aa:...o+ea+i+ewia+,*+�w•'++vi1Vi�Ne:@+tk.+y.+si'�-+v-...r.nwfriLe1R+E,+-a rR.acsfr=lS�FS'v.:a:Fw�Y< ..r...�.Y Date December 6, 1982 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) 1.3 Call To Staff, Council & Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description 'l 1S NRb fi Co vk X 2uts,,d o►�. J - 7-- C s a December 13, 1982 �aEia�+n; . ` Yi` '�"'-�� o a`�"d•�g C�une ''�n'' � - the following item: (Please print your nacre) Item Description: 5.1 CPA 6-82 Energy COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARING sponent (Eor) Opponent (against) ae, Addrest and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation 4 -3 f 1 i I i l 4 t L r c Ell ya`= December 13, 1982 4 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on �r the following item: (Please print your nave) Item Description: 5.2 CPA 7-82 Air, Water & Land Resources Quality COMPREHENSIVE PIAN HEARING ponent (for) Opponent (against) e,t Address and Affiliation Name, Address and ?affiliation j' t 7 cJFr_Til-% -Sr Lr Pe<—,a ce� C- 71 a - -- •r' F i F C I C. --- - �'� Aja LC f I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on {` the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 5.3 CPA 8-82 Economy COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HEARING �ponent (for) Opponent (against) Me, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation 2v6-1 L / Lc 7� l ce C 3 r ! i i CITY OF IECEI _ e .f..t TIGARD County WASHINGTON - o o cf Y CF 1 G" q� v x ¢ N s> H U N O La D P+ E-4 � Ei.ct:o. PQ r" ¢ o d o r r ate, GEIfERAL r,, S November 2, 1982 C) N a a 04 Pae.• �C)., a a o x x o N ¢ w Ballot Number N c.� H b Nem.or D m No,of Precinct I I I I I ell O _ 30 Q�91 / 's o 0 31 / l / /o s a �4 '^ 32 S / 0 Z 33 N 34 3 /-q / 6� i 35 G 196 / �21 21-3 11791 401'7 [5 7-:3 Z 97 .1.26 41 39S 93 99 a —3 46 180 k0 S� .� l /7/ -1 -_ - - I Write-In For Mayor 1231 Write-In Miscellaneous 19 Write-In For Councilf 7 3 = i 3 I, C I '- �n0' V I 3 Dat- ✓�v• 02� c{ o `Slo G o s Donald \':. R%ason, Direct r �?' O=—_ o .ss:as;� n; ar, er.an k Ex-Officio Chi—efQputy unt Clerk r A TOTAL ysj$5 l68 1250 3q 5 26323�4II 7 1 certify that the votes recorded on this abstract cor- Signature of County Clerk: Date of Abstract redly summerize the tally of votes cast at the election indicated. I ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT GENERAL AND ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT PRIMARY ELECTIONS: SPECIAL ELECTIONS: Separate sheets for Democratic, Republican, Nonpartisan, and other candidates. Votes test for Governor must be on separate Separate sheets for candidates for City, County (including precinct) page or pages. and State office. For additional instructions see ORS 250.810. For additional instructions, see ORS 249.410. �ECENED .-)F T ly C-D n� ' I! Y 0 y G E':KF-sL rZ 'm :Rs �'kL w 9-- LQ a Hca c = = P4 in -:ovem.ber 2, 1982 1 .4 1-- 0 U ro -4 � ;Z; -4 w z< rn U1 L) Cn > > m �;o S !40 TENo FS 0 30 C) 0 31 —4 21 < 0 32 Z 3-3 2" 34 35 40 ZZ 41 46 Iso 0 Z ------------ 2- Como/ .-7 CO?l' OF T H E 0R11Ir %rz.' Clerk,y C"Ou C lc3"J'A� By- 'OTAL certify that the votes recorded on this abstract cor- Signature of County Clerk: Date of Abstract rectly summarize the tally of votes cast at the election in 6;C a i e d-.— ABSTRACT OF: VOTES AT GENERAL AND ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT PRIMARY ELECTIONS: SPECIAL ELECTIONS: Separate sheets for Democratic, Republican, Nonpartisan, and other candidates. Votes cost for Governor must be on separate Separate sheets for candidates for City, County (including precinct} page o, pages. and State office. For additional instructions sea ORS 250.810. For additional instructions, see ORS 249.410. C1 T1 RD WASHRI, N COUNTY,OREGON December 6 , 1982 Mayor and City Council City of Tigard, Oregon SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TIMELINE iHonorable Persons : Staff is cognizant of the requests, both formal and informal , of the various advisory boards and committees for additional time to review the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recognizes that some of the NPO' s have not been able to review all chapters, but Council should know that several of the NPO' s have reviewed them and staff has already responded. A timely submittal of the Comprehensive Plan is essential for many reasons, but not at the expense of undoing any NPO' s confidence in its opportunity to be involved_ I , therefore, recommend a 45-day extension to the Comprehensive Plan timeline within the following: e 12/7 , 12/9 & 12/11 -- Planning Commission Hearings e 12/13, 12/14 & 12/15 -- City Council Hearings e Week of 12/13/82 -- NPO and CCI Meetings v Week of 12/20/82 -- NPO and CCI Meetings • Week of 1/3/83 -- NPO and CCI Meetings o 1/11 and 1/13 -- Planning Commission Hearings e 1/24 , 1/25 & 1/26 -- City Council Hearings It would be my recommendation that those chapters which can be adopted with substantial agreement be adopted in December. On December 15, 1982, the Council should then identify those remain- ing chapters to be concluded in January. The Development Code itself can be deferred until February. This timeline allows those NPO' s who have not finished reviewing the Final Drafts to do so without unduly delaying City financial and work program decisions. Yours truly, CI VTID Roben,L=112755S.W.ASH Cityrator City Attorney, nning Director P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 December 6, 1982 Mr. Wilbur Bishop Mayor, City of Tigard City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Time extension for comprehensive plan hearings. Dear Mr. Bishop, and Council Members: The NPO #4 members have expended considerable time and effort informing all property owners in the NPO #4 area of the new Comprehensive Plan. The NPO mailed out over 250 questionaires / advisements to all property owners inviting them to a neighborhood meeting to discuss and answer their questions on several critical issues affecting their neighborhood. By soliciting their recommendations we can more accurately represent their desires during the present comprehensive planning process, providing that the NPO and CCI are given enough time to develop policies that reflect those desires. The NPO #4 feels that the new Comprehensive Plan stresses the obvious and does ' not address in detail the specific planning concerns of each individual area. The Committee for Citizen Involvement is attempting to review and refine the plan in these special areas, and will do so much more effectively then the Planning Commission hearings scheduled December 6 through 11. In addition, the second most critical element, - transportation, has not been available to the NPOs or reviewed by the CCI. NPO #4 would like to go on record as requesting a postponement of the planning commissions hearings scheduled for the week of December 6 through 11, concerning the new comprehensive plan . NPO #4 recommeds that a extention of time be obtained from LCDC, and the Planning Commissions hearings be rescheduled for sometime in 1983. Very truly yours, Gordon S. Martin 3r. NPO #4 Chairman WAM Tigard City Council Tigard, OR 97223 Council Members : This is a request for additional time to review the Tigard Compre- hensive Plan and to extend hearings and any decisions for 60 days to allow citizen understanding and citizen input before the plan is adopted. The request is made for the following reasons : NPO members received the plans in entirety only last Wednesday. There has not been time for discussions or for citizens to be aware of what actions are contemplated. Many areas of concern have not been addressed. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan is too important to be hastily ramroded through. After it is adopted, the citizens and the Council are going to have to live with it. Care should be taken so that there are not regrettable loopholes or nasty surprises. With the present schedule, all that will be possible for the Planning Commission or the Council will be rubber stamp approval. Persons donating their time to the NPO's are dedicated to the idea that citizen input is inportant in government. If this is going to be ignored, there is no significance in having Neighborhood Planning. The holiday season is too busy a time to try to push such an important plan through because people are involved and have their businesses to attend and their lives to manage. Since there has al- ready been delays , an extra few weeks is not going to make that much difference when the benefits of careful study are considered. New Council members should also have time to consider the plan and to be aware of citizen concerns because the new Council is the one that is going to have to live with the plan and make the future decisions based on it. With the present schedule and one new council member unable to attend hearings over the next week or two because of terminal illness in the family, it seems only courteous to extend the hearings and actions. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. —a J NPO 6 I? f J , Cz 6LQ� ct- ci-cilu-7- CCA-��. Lolie- i ._ � r T]GA R1) PLANK I Nr; c,OMM I SS I ON ',I[:HT1 NC NOVI:MM"K '3 , 1982 Regular Meeting Minutes 1. President Tepedino ca. ed the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Tepedino; Commissioners Clifford Speaker , Don Moen, Bonnie Owens, and itoy Bonn. Excused absence: Phil Edin, Mark Christen, Deane Leverett and Richard Helmer. STAFF: William Monahan, Director of Planning and Development; Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner; and Diane Jelderks, Clerk Typist . 3. The minutes from November 9, 1982 were considered. President Tepedino stated that minor corrections had been made to staff prior to the meeting. Commissioner Owens noted that on page 4, second paragraph that she was concerned that the number of units per acre was correct not the size of the lot. Commissioner Bonn moved and Commissioner Moen seconded to approved minutes as corrected and amended. The motion carried unanimously by members of the Commission present. 4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION o NPO #3 submitted a memorandum regarding the Energy Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS • President Tepedino opened the Public Hearing by reading the usual statement of authority for the procedure to be followed in the meeting. e President Tepedino wanted to publicly congratulate Bonnie Owens as he had heard a number of comments on how well she had handled the CCI meeting in his absence. She has been doing a fire job for the City, Planning Commission and staff. • President Tepedino provided his personal thought from his perspective as Chairman of the Planning Commission. He emphasized the urgency of the timing of this effort. There is a lot of pressure both externally and internally. We have a responsibility to the growth of the City with the planning that is being done. We have the responsibility as Planning Commissioners to the City, the public, ourselves and the NPO's. The NPO's will gain from a Comprehensive Plan. For too many years we've been fighting the difficulty of the various Neighborhood Planning Organizations diverting from what was the main thrust of the plan or disagreeing with Neighborhood Plans on the other side of the street. c NEW He feels it is necessary to adopt a Comprehensive Plan at this time. lie also wanted to emphasize thMt Life is a compromise and those who { will not compruulise are like trees which refuse to bend in the wind, and we all will suffer from those who refuse to compromise. The staff is doing its uCmost to provide the NPO's, the CCI , Planning Commission and City Council with the best information they have been able to develop. However, lie would submit today that the Comprehensive Plan will not be perfect. lie would suggest that we take a long range, philosophical view, and try to get something in place, because the right to amend is theirs, the NPO's, CCI and City Council, to modify and correct as needed. In his estimation it would be worse to leave Elie City without a plan than to have a plan that is not totally adequate. He felt to drop the ball now would be a terrible disservice to the City of Tigard. 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ENERGY Jeremy Coursolle , Associate Planner explained how this is the second element of the Comprehensive Plan. The first element, Citizen Involvement, was adopted by the City Council, November 22, 1982. The second element deals with energy and conservation, the City's role and the energy sources that are economically feasible to any structure within the City of Tigard. (Staff has attempted to set some direction rather than placing mandates. ) That way when information is available to us, the economy turns around, and interest is there within the community, we then will start looking at some means to help to conserve the energy that we do have. The NPO's have all had an opportunity to look at this document. Unfortunately, the CCI did not reach a total consensus. Staff has requested that each NPO chairperson have comments submitted prior to the public hearing. Mr. Coursolle, reminded the Commission that this is a legislative hearing requiring a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the City Council. Staff is proposing one change, adding policy 9.1.3. THE CITY SHALL ENCOURAGE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT WHICH EMPHASIZES SOUND ENERGY CONSERVATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. (This was a suggestion from a member in NPO #4.) Associate Planner Coursolle reviewed the energy document which includes Energy Conservation and Local Governments' Role, Alternative Energy Sources, Findings, Policies and Implementation Strategies. The document was reviewed page by page with staff and Planning Commissioners making changes and corrections as necessary. y NPO #3's submission was read into the record by Associate Planner Coursolle. Discussion followed between Commissioners and staff as to the intent of this recommendation. • Associate Planner Coursolle explained locational criteria. He stated that established and developing areas should be compatible and that locational criteria would insure this would happen. PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 23, 1982 f r MEMORANDUM i November 24, 1982 TO: City Administrator / City Council FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Replacement Police Vehicles RE: Joint Purchasing with the City of Beaverton i i Sir: Request authorization to joint purchase two (2) replacement vehicles with the City of Beaverton. j The Police Budget authorizes two (2) replacement vehicles. The City of Beaverton is at this time in the process of advertising for bids; subsequently, the City of Tigard is not named in the formal bidding process. I have talked to the Beaverton Purchasing Super- visor, and they have no objection to Tigard purchasing under their bid agreement. 00 R.B. Adams Chief of Police RBA:ac Avoid Verbal Messages A-1 CITY OF TIGARD To: Chief Adams From: Doris Hartig Subject: OLCC Application Date:_ 11/15/82 Please review, make recommendation and return to this office by Wednesday, December 8th, so that we may include it in the agenda for the Daeeh City Council Meeting. Thank you. BUS STOP DELI (formerly Bon Appetite) 10240 SW Nimbus, L-4 Tigard, Oregon 97223 c. MEMORANDUM November 19, 1982 TO: City Administrator / City Council FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: New OLCC Application RE: The Bus Stop Deli 10240 S.W. Nimbus, Bldg. #L-4 Tigard, Oregon Applicant: Thomas A. and Julie Rae Soika 12847 S.W. 61st Street Portland, Oregon Sir: This new business will be located in the Koll Business Center. The on site inspection of the business site and proposed operating hours of 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. should not create a negative impact to this business center complex, and there should be very little if any policing problems. Therefore, it is recommended their application be approved and forwarded to the OLCC Commission. Respectfully, I •B� r Chief of Police RBA:ac Avoid Verbal Messages .r CITY OF TIGARD TO: rhijf of Pnlit _ --- From: Det- Sar L Br D-IttettCr Subject:--- Nell Ltau_or lie.a•,s— neLaAnz!______r Date: 11-17-82 APPLICANT: SOIKA, Thomas A SOIKA, Julie Rae 12847 S W. 61st St. Portland, Ore. DEA The Sus Stop Deli 10240 S.W. Nimbus Bldg. #L-4 Tigard, Oregon LICENSE REQUESTED% Retail malt beverage RECOMMENDATION: Approval Applicants shoes no criminal history, and the location and type of business does not appear to cause any additional police problem. I made an on sight inspection on 11-17-82 talking with Julie Soika, she indicated that their business hours will be from 9:00 AM to 5:30 PM and they did intend on package sales in additon to sale by glass. - Avoid Verbal Messages A-1 CITY OF TIGARD To: Cif Adams From: Doris Hartig Subject: OICC Application Date:_ 11/15/82 Please review, make recommendation and return to this office by Wednesday, December 8th, so that We may include it in the agenda for the December 13th City Council Meeting. Thank you. BUS STOP DELI (formerly Bon Appetite) 10240 SW Nimbus, L-4 Tigard, Oregon 97223 3 STATE OF OREGON 9079 S.E. McLoughlin Boulevard PAGE OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION P.O. Box 22297 Portland, Oregon 97222 APPLICATION GENERAL INFORMATION N° 5363 The filing of this application does not commit the Commission to the granting of the license that you are applying for, no: does it permit you to operate the business named below. If a license is granted by the Commission, you will receive a LICENSE CERTIFICATE. No fee is collected by 011 until a LICENSE CERTIFICATE is to be issued. (THIS SPACE IS FOR 011 OFFICE USE) (THIS SPACE IS FOR CITY OR COUNTY USE) Application is being made for: NOTICE TO CITIES AND COUNTIES: Do not consider this (( BOTTLER ) Greater Privilege application unless it has been stamped and signed at the C^ BREWERY ,:_:1:Lesse'ir Privilege left by an 011 representative. DISPENSER CLASS A New Licensee THE CITY COUNCIL, COUNTY COMMISSION, OR COUNTY DISPENSER CLASS B New Location "•I -T , New Ouel DISTILLERY -- t COURT OF DRUGGIST New Partner (Name of City or C.-:y) FARMER'S WINERY RECOMMENDS THAT THIS LICENSE BE: GRANTED INDUSTRIAL ALCOHOII RAILROAD, PUBLIC PASSENGER C lEROR� DENIED RESTAURANT RETAIL MALT BEVERAGE DATE SEASONAL DISPENSER SPECIAL EVENTS DISPENSER BY WHOLESALE MALT BEVERAGE AND WINEGe1/11`l (Signature) WINERY TITLE CAUTION: If your operation of this business depends on your receiving a liquor license, OLCC cautions you not to purchase, remodel, or start construction until your license is granted. 1. Name(s) of individual applicant(s), partnership, or corporation: 1)1�, rY,�>> S o i k 1 - 4 7 S �AjS1` Cc ril I Ill ) (Address) (C,y) (star— ) 2> LLe—�WeSol k4. g` � .S 1i.1 �n��f POrT�Qri(� P (NamerP` {v 3) e. 4) (EACH PERSON �LISTED ABOV MUST FILE AN INDIVIDUAL HISTORY AND A FINANCIAL STATEMENT) �� 2. Trade name of premises �_� (In Y �� I When filed: —.� P�� '��,�oo (Year Name Filed wi h Corporation Commissioner) 3. Former trade name �LL p p r 4 -e A. Premises address c7i�0 S W• /Y f l� U .C� L- r -�=� (Number,Street, Rural Re) _(bounty) (State) (Zip) 5. Business mailing address 10QI out 'A �-5 �-- i CA P Drec In (P.O.Box, Number,Street, Rural Route) (City) (State)v (Zip) 6. Was premises previously licensed by OLCC? Yes_ No Year 7. If yes, to whom: _ Type of license: — 8. Will you have a manager: Yes:jr— Name (Manager must fill out Individual History, blue page 2) 9. Will anyone else not signing Xapplication share in the ownership or receive a percentage of profits or bonus from this business? Yes _ No 10. What is the local governing body where your premises is located? r r G a ` ' ''(Name of C y or County 11. OLCC representative making investigation may contact:- SOT Ka (Name) (Address) (Tel. No.—home, business,message) CAUTION: The Administrator of the Oregon Liquor Control Cor.Tmission must be notified if y.,u are contacted by anybody offering to influence the Commission on your behalf. Applicants) Signature (1) 1 (In case of corporation,duly authorized officer thereof) (2) di (3) — (4) original geyem 1 �� - Sa DATE ya0697Aa5 Foran (rRt7 1 S LNID VIDUAL, f STATE;OF.OREGON 9079 SE. McLoughlin Blvd. f!l�T�FEY_ OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION P.O. Box 22297 rA Portland, Oregon 97222 Application blanks must be Hued in r /,9 OLCC Aihe question does not apply to you place,N/q(Not Applicable)in the apace. _ USE �- s•s, ., v., 1 \(l ( ONLY 1 . {.••� fi oche,names used _ 4 1'ia e C e Yf D t%1 (air) r nal Date of Birth 5 Place of Birth �7(l1 (ciry) ►1 I ( I j_' a[e / (5[ or Cpun") try ..Height 3 r r t Weight © b�• Color Hair �� C h) f l Color Eyes , i L l.0 I l Sex N-- Name//of Spouse , r(�y� O..Hr,ma Phone J!–U (� C}_- J Q a Business Phone . (ra (Area cos.) A ,9r•U S.Citizen:.Yes No It"No"list Allen Reg.No.'• ` CRIMINAL RECORD NOTE: For your Information,a criminal records check is made on all liquor license applicants in the normal processing of a license ':^�•-'. .request.Fingerprints may,be required. 10k Have you been convicted(including probation,sentencing,or bail forfeiture)of any crime.violation,or infraction o1 any law?(Do ,'.'C not Include minor traffic violations for which a fine or bail forfeiture of$50 or less was imnposed). Yes No 1065km there presently pending against you any criminal charges.Liolatlons or Infractions of the law?.(Do not include minor traffic violations for,which a.fine_or bail forfeiture of$50 or less was Imposed). Yes No X 10C.v, you have answered Yes to 10A or 10B Ilst below: 011artaf `Data- +C1K and State Result r (P ttactt additional sheet if,.necessary.) s a SHOTE The Information listed In 1 through 70 above can protect you from an error In the criminal records check. r'r* EMPLOYMENT AND RESIDENCE HISTORY - A.,... 11 ,f�8t Rrranf_and'fonner employerS orror Dons during the past ten years:(Attach additional sheet if necessary.) 8�h` D_stw YlonUtJYsar.-, Emlpif ysr BuNrts}�s •- ��oaupstlon l City and tats roRr��^�c3 To 3' l #;riL�l (� ( l`t ft< '-� t Ct L\t i 1)1 1 l.r:< i t t t '\C rj ( • 1r , •� \ 1r.;�,-t•� �.1J� C-,\4(l T# Fro 3 R ULt �t �t � v J +stt•-�•.,amu-l`^u Tc-�yal� •' . r. •r -TO ^.i'°,�""�6,� fm yNVF 4.4.; i trtat arsdties and states y3here yotl ave 1 ved Int past 1 O years other than those no In question 11 above:(Attach additional if necessary) [ ;�Ditss :MontlJYsar _ - City and Stats . To y ACTIVITY IN`LIOUOR INDUSTRY(Inside or Outside Oregon) � Loy presently or have you�been licensed o,�employed�n the liquor business? - everg:,yraQrrting aotf '•ofloletlons^ujspenslon-.(Ine,or revocation as a licensee or permittee? :j rive! tato a�ir�mtphtilcar e to sell serge-or�Citspense beer.wine.or distilled spirits? 4T No Vyhe &len?{.� =_•i. you hald or do you presentlodld,a gambling or gaming license from-any governmental body or a Federal Gambling Tax F- Nom whare$when? 4 vgyou everheld r do you hold ar)y,ij nGal Interest in any Itqu r enterprise:manufacturing,Importing,wholesale or retail? )No ,-%Vherre&When? OWe mo 0 BnY manufacturer o!distribiitor of wine beer or distilled spirits on account of cash or credit advanced? es r� No Wh r�;eBWtMten? g�apouse ory familX:mem4er(sT46rklin any area }othe liquor industry? 33rrles, .' NoT ' IL} � Iva r •.,.a` a r(wra.of 6uslnsee) (Gly a steal misea Involved •Trade Name ~� 1 t y' t7'_ f4Clbeaou.bT ::,3bTitle• (Mgr..Gore.Officer-etc.) t CAUTION^ FA4LSIFlCATION OR INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS OF INFORMATION ON THIS FORM MAY BE GROUNDS TO DENY OR R-F\/OKE YOURAPPUCATION EORA LICENSEI t1 T - .:r CE t �s .t GLJ W Date: /Cis .Signature .� �T �lY q 5 3,F c ' t• OLCC)Ofnps r7s2 COPE ut[le.'2rid Copr-.Applicant SP40770845 rQr,q Ksabast(teat) ..r' v ^.Z � J_� r t livt�®lYl�ldD►L ,`',h STATE OF OREGON 9079 SE. McLoughlin Blvd. HI . .ORY c "y: OREGON LIQUOR�CONTROL COMMISSION P.O. BOX 22297 LL Portland, Oregon 97222 x�ffi � } Page;2 . °Appllcatlon }4([blanks.must be fllted to . OLCC estion doej riot apply to you,place WA(Not Ap,pllcable)in the space. USE ONLY 1 Nara& _• -(tet, ti - -. (First) - (Middle) 2 oilier names used x -� 7 .S f ' U er' 3 Address I (City (Stole, (ZIP) '•4=�SSN _l '� _�i1-_ -tt! +� Date of Birth `f _ J.Z Age J 5 Platre of Birth' !'f�t b l� �1 f C t C3 J tr (City):.._„ / (, (Stela or country) .._Hotght Weight D L"'�' ColorHair �- Color Eyes Name of Spouse `9 Home Phone' D L•L ,v�V 3 Business Phone (A— - - (Area Code) S.Citizen:Yes No If."No"list Allen Reg.No.. CRIMINAL RECORD NOTEX_For.your Information.•a-criminal records check Is made on all-liquor license applicants in the normal processing of a license .. request,Fingerprints-nay,be required. ' iOA,'tFiave you been convicted(including probation f antenping or ball iorfalture)of any crime,violation,or infraction of any la ?(Do •� 3tOt Include minor.traftic violations for which a fine or bail forfeiture of$50 or less was imnposed). Yes No A 10B-there presently'pendingl ageinst you any cri(ninai charges,vlolatlons or Infractions of the I w (Do not include minor traffic v iolations for which fin&or ball forfeiture of$50 or less:was Imposed). Yes No 10�_I;you have answered Yes'•.to-_10A or tOB`'Iist below ,.iflHsnaa - - Date ''City and Stab Raoult (APach additional sheat If pecessary),r. - - �` NOTE:The Information Ilsted.in•1 through 10 above can protect you from an error in the criminal records check. EMPLOYMENTAND RESIDENCE HISTORY 71:;Liat current and former employers or occupations during the past ten years:(Attach additional sheet if necessary.) ,Dates by MontNYear Employer or Business Oceupatl n J� City and Stab To From Td' From'` To 12,'Uat other Cities and states where you have lived In the past 10 years other than those noted in question 11 above:(Attach additional -.sheet if necessary.) '='ti'•Dstoe by MonY ths ear City and Stab i?;C. To To _:;a.• rout To.." ._�3. ria ACT)VITy IN LIQUOR,INDUSTRY(Inside.or Outside Oregon) « e'you presently or have you`been)icerrsed ortemployed Irl the liquor business? 1Nhere&When?. f}[av&you evera recei warning a potice n of vlolatio ,suspension; r fine,or revocation as a licensee or pemittee? e4.; -Nod Whef93 When1' ;1y�}riave you'ever n refused a.permit'or Ilcense,to sell.serve or dispense beer,wine,or distilled spirits? Yes No 1 1.WhereB�When4 tEx It(rve you.held,or,do you presently hold,a gambling or gaming license lrpm any governmental body or a Fede.at Gambling Tax ee �-.No YVhera&Nyhan?; `*,.P._I-lave you ever he "r do you`hold arty firiaticlal injerestln any liquor enterprise:manufacturing,Importing,wholesale or retail? 1 Y.' No'•- YRrer�.BWhen�'r 76.=Do.y�,ou owe mons any manufacturer or distributor of wine,bear or distilled spirits on account of cash or credit advanced? , No Whered.When? �q? Urispouse or y family member(s),workiny In an ea of the 1_tquor Industry? -�_gg No If Yes:'give r v�•,A..• 4!. (Name of B-i—) (City a State, r.,} 20. remifses tmrolved:''Trod&tJarne fie Address ` ` '` Job Title t forty a sou m x L, (Mor..C—P.auesr.eee.) s1� ..,L 3 O[I„FALSIFlCATION,OR"INTENTIONAOMISSIONS OF,INF QRMATION ON THIS FORM MAY BE GROUNDS TO DENY OR r REVOKE YOUR,�PQUCATIOt(FOR A UCENSEI4� �jy ` r y S10 furs �¢li' Fi .-K =� Date: '.'.au. .r-y a y Sj origtruJ—incat oLCc OMxa tat Copy--0LCC MlNnukle.2nd Copy—Applicant }} SWA0770-a45 -Pawl ��s�L(12-01) ♦r x �.Z4 5 --� _ ."`�j .; 9079 S.E. McLoughlin Boulevard P.O. Box 22297 STATE OF OREGON Portland, Oregon 972222 OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION PAGE APPLICATION FINANCIAL STATEMENT Name U01C2 QtL� � LL� t f � JI L2 ASSETS(Owned) AMOUNT OUSEE LIABILITIES(Owed) AMOUNT OFFICE USE "ash on hand (not in bank) Accounts Payable (Schedule D) _ash on deposit: Notes Payable (Schedule D) C` Checking at AMUSE Contracts Payable (Schedule D) �.` Checking at Real Estate Mortgages and Contracts Savings at rl ?a (� Payable (Schedule A) — Savings at ,,i �c Other (Describe) Cash value of: Vehicles /0 , Ci &U Life insurance Machinery and equipment Merchandise inventories Stocks and Bonds (Schedule B) Real Estate (Schedule A) c v .Accounts Receivable(Schedule C) Notes Receivable(Schedule C) Contracts Receivable(Schedule C) Other personal property O C'U ther Monies Available (Describe) TOTAL LIABILITIES -NET WORTH i TOTAL ASSETS TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET W TTH 'To arrive at NET WORTH, subtract total liabilities from total assets. 1.?Annual Income: Last year's total salary $ _— Explain: 2. Have you any assets or liabilities not listed on this financial statement? Yes No n If yes, explain why not included 3.1 Are you an endorser or guarantor for others? Yes No 4. If yes, explain: AA 4 aye yotS any judgmenh or sorts filed against you4 ylfes No If yes, explain: .. 1 S Neve you ever filed a petition in bankruptcy or been adjudged bankrupt? Yes No If yes, explain: Year: Court: City: State: (Attach additional sheet if necessary for any question.) 'UTION: FALSIFICATION OR INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS OF INFORMATION ON THIS FORM MAY BE GROUNDS TO DENY OR REVOKE YOUR APPLICATION FOR A LICENSE. Signature )L" .'i�" �L -�'•�lG'• - (Spou se, if this a jjoint state"nt) 1st COPY—Applicant Date X — SP194464MS Fenn 64645482(1/M i w State of Oregon 9079 S.E.McLoushlln Boulevard OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION PP- O.Boz 22297 ortland,Oregon 97222 P-AGE APPLICATION FINANCIAL STATEMENT WORKSHEET Name T1 n /te :alk h P r i t Ci Date Schedule A REAL ESTATE *Show amount of delinquent taxes on each property under mortgages. If due in installments show amount and whether payri ent includes interest and at what rate. • _ .MORTGAGES .TYPE AND LOCATION DATE TITLE IN INCOME ORIGINAL MARKET BOLDER OF LIEN OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED NAME OF PER MONTH COST VALUE EARN TE PIER ST t s-/ -W Schedule B STOCKS AND BONDS • BOOK VALUE - ITETIMER FDESCRIPTION—RATE--MATURITY.IF PLEDGED.TO WHOM MARKET VALUE IF NO MARKET AR t Schedule C NOTES, CONTRACTS AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE PAYMENT DESCRIPTIO OF COLLATERAL DUE FROM(NAME) DAANY iE OF ,I, S DUE DATE OBLIGATION ORIGINAL PRESENT Schedule D NOTES, CONTRACTS AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE . czPAYMENT DUE DATE DESCRIPTION or OLLATFYALANY ••, DUE TO(NAME) SDC jggED TERMS ORIGINAL PRESENT 1 IM COPY—AVPHI—t SP-03344-M Feem MbtS40 ({/70) - Ts a vd P.P. u 15 November 1982 PORTLAND Dear Local Government Official: STATE UNIVERSITY p.o.box 751 Listed below is the working population estimate for July 1, 1982. Portland,oregon 97207 Also listed are the July 1 revised estimates for 1981, 1980, 1979 and 503/229-3922 1978, and the April 1, 1980 U.S. Bureau of the Census figure. Please review the 1982 estimate for reasonableness. center for population A copy of the Administrative Rules, which detail the types of research and census data acceptable for an official review of the estimate, is available on request. If you have any questions, or wish a review of the estimate, please call the Center for Population Research and Census at 229-3922 and speak with me or with Patricia Leighton, our program manager. July 1, 1982 Estimate 1737-7 April 1, 1980 Census July 1, 1981 Estimate /5/00 July 1, 1979 Estimate /3500 July 1, 1980 Estimate July 1, 1978 Estimate /2 Sincerely yours, Edward Schafer, Director Center for Population Research and Census ( ES:ms MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING STAF��N"� SUBJECT: Richard Thornberg, D & R Body Shop application for a wreckers license. Attached is a letter signed by Bill Monahan and Chief Adams dated September 24 , 1982, supporting Mr. Thornberg '-s request for a wreckers license. Based on this support, Mr. Thornberg filed an application for a wreckers license with the State Motor Vehicles Division. The City Council needs to make a recommendation for issuance of a wreckers license to D & R Body Shop. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ' Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign Mr. Thornberg' s application for a wreckers license at 11572 S .W. Barbur Blvd. C wan September .24, 1982.; •.f.M.::.,.-',:"> :. J _ i-yj„rw� '�L v-tr,r, �5 �� '� - �t y.-✓vr WASHIN(`.iL7I;I�C.�iJN7Y:,'OR{EGON e: t � rT�fia 'i .Motor Vehicles".Division�F .� s ��Tc L h� � �F a Xf RfS-.�3Y1T1{("'� 1 Stateof Or 1905 Lana..Avenue, ,N.E ��" " Salem, Oregon 97314 _Y 5 v € RE: FU c- Th 'rnberg D &'R BodyoShop, '11572 S.W ;�Bartiuz Blvd ; ..Tigard;' Oregon :.(application`;z°for�i=.dealer's.-license ., or.r,-.rrecker_'s_licensdX 481.015`(3) 'and.'ORS* 481 345)': F .L S Gentlemen: �; ; ,a.• Mr. 7fhornberg had reQuested the .City of Tigard r:to••-submit, a.1.letter to<<yourfi E - office• in su ort-"-bf:'.hist:a ilcation•.•for one or both:'of;.the' above,refereaced _ PP. _ .� PP... .. • ., licenses.,.,, Please;be'ia* dvised-,Vthat_the City of .Tigard .has; 116.-.::objectioa,-5trt rMr Thornbergy s•._.present c•use-of '.his property as D �-:.R Body Shop preexiating -*nonconfoi-ming- use.in-:a:..:C-5 zone, which ..allows: neither;auto."' Ies, . repair shops:or wrecking yards;as'outright permitted or conditional Based -on., the::.City.•s inspection. of::. the business •land interviews sJith;.Mr. Thornberg, his present use of•.the:.property may be described-;as followS. Mr. Thornberg's normal. business as D & R Body. Shop is body and. 'fender• wortc. : .'On occasioa,;;he buys:::a..wrecked automobile,and> uses,.a-:.torch toti7cut- the undamaged, usable .,:portions of the wrecked car. for use.< on the partially wrecked car.,_Eihich he is repairing. He. than. sells the wrecked Rrtion�of the Rcar tyd• �irecking:.Yard; usually,. Tlsboro °A�to�, �.,�. s the=remaining parts;:or,4wrecked `.car.body'::are. completely;unusaoae .,the.sells them.::as scrap: On':occasion; .he purchases a wrecked' car,;`repairs;°ii: and. resells it to the general -.public. "A" The City has conducted a site inspection and has discussed the following conditions with Mr. Thornberg. 1. Any outside storage of parts shall be done entirely within a site obscuring fenced area. 2. All parts obtained shall be used on site or sold as scrap. No.,,,retail sales of parts shall be permitted. In order for Mr. Thornberg to alter or expand the present use described,above, he would first have to make application to the City to justify such change or. expansion. C 12755 S.IN.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 r — t i Page -2 September 24, 1982 ..,,Motor,Vehicles Division #+s r also 'our opinion that Fir.. Thornberg =is of :good_ moral, character and :•'•:•': !endeavors :�ao r duct= :'his• business,:--in s'a + lawful, manner If..: any,*~further y anformatfon tis.- required: from: -the 'City' .of Tigard,-to ..enable' your , office to F T ' +R!roe Mr.3 Thornberg':s.application9,.please -do, �+not&hesitate to#contact us.. 4 Sincerely, Williams A. Monahan of Robert'.B. .Adams Director<of Planning &-Development TigardT.Police'Department WAM:1w E cc: Mr. Richard Thornberg I S t i � i Department of Transportation -�-- MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION ��-••E^ 1905 LANA AVENUE N.E.. SALEM. OREGON 97314 November 18, 1982 D & R Body Shop 11572 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97223 For the reas;ns indicated below, we are unable to process your application. Please comply with the items checked, return any required documents and fees in the envelope provided, and we will give your application prompt at- tention. XX We are returning your remittance of $20.00 together with your application. Please complete the items checked below. we have received your remittance in the anount of $ and will hold them pending receipt of your completed application or documents as requested below. A total fee of $ is required for the business license. Additional Dealer License Plates are $ each. Please forward an additional remittance of $ Complete line(s) in full. Line 10 on the front of the application must be completed by one of the law enforcement agencies indicated on the application. XX The bond form ccxx bEx)veueOseo O(fXAA-)ecx)PPbixxDddl must be completed in in full by your surety company. one of your firm's principal's signature is required on the Lund. Since your supplemental place of business is located in a different city, the enclosed application for a supplemental bus`.ness license must be completed. A fee of $30 is required for each supplemental business location. Complete the enclosed Vehicle Dealer Agreement form. ` XX other item 10 or 11 needs to be completed. Thank you for your cooperation. Business Licensing Telephone 373-1007 nh Form 735-6227 ( ) .................................................... 1 --N y A .. �♦ �• .r.�\.+ � AVL.. .. . Motor Vehicles or Salvage Pool Operators Expires December 31, 1982 MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION,Salem,Oregon 97314 Purt:nn nt to prnvi.inn.of ORS 491.345 to 4141.370 inclusive,481.340 and 481.435,the undersigned hereby npplies for a businam license W -d-1 .n thu,u,tu of 01.gun Lho bu.in. of wrecking,diamuntUng,permanently dlsaasembllng or substantially altering the foist of motor vehicles for the period ending December 31, 1982. 1. Nam. C y-.f- . .bC7.Cl. .......5.. .. .C.. _ Business Phone �certa.auen�-„d-or.r.nmtiiw.;nr..',,,,nrt ]I:n,.L,,.,,.,.c.Lv:u:,u: //.J 7� SC..:, �r.rb✓��tl !'G'r%�li[.•U L,!!q.'S.l?.C.�'S.%.P�%_ .. r : >laailtgddv- .............................................M7 ..3._ _....... Give the addresses of all additional locations of the business: ._n.a.ne Nvmbcr) [cirri to ”) ..._................._.................. ..........................................................................:... ........................................................................ ..... .........................1.......... ................ _ .............................................................................. .................................................... 5. Check type of organization: ndividual p Partnership r_,J' Corporation 6. If corporation.give the name of the state under whose laws the corporation is organized ............................................................................._.......__... Give the name and address of the managing agent or resident attorney-in-fact: Name _..........__..................................... Title................................. Address.............................................................._.................... 7. lA1PORTANT: Give name and residence address of all individual owners,partners or corporation officers: 1Name1 Roidr Add—) Md.) t t K H R..D... 1=.........T/.cL..o./z..N...B..G.tC............... 3............ ..................__U ................ ......._......... ... r�... ? lhv�N1h\tThN1*01 tltc Jv'Aw-ty tri-hi.h the business is located are.. G(0._1t.x t. 9. I certify that I am the applicant or an authorized representative and that all information on this application is accurate. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE AN ENCLOSURE OR OTHER BAR- RIER AT LEAST SIX FEET IN HEIGHT THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORS 481.370 AND THAT THE RIGHT OF WAY OF ANY HIGHWAY ADJACENT TO THE LICENSED AREA IS UTILIZED EXCLUSIVELY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC PARKING. . �(Cbi�i..k.cl..E....Thcz.c.al. ..c�✓..-y............d...W...4..4'7..... Any perces.vb k_w"jy m.k—any r.1-.ftw—it.or kno,ri 1 a.frV_1y e e„y .L.w..thtns,'MuCied by oH9� �..7.�� .4..►1.G�+✓.SG+..t_1........t�c�......................_.... Ch.plrr t8i u br...ors w./hrmod b,commit.a Cl.r C FebnY and SL ........ uprn mnv,nirn Dull br w,bleta a.mpri.omnent for rot mere than five SUcet Addrer yrua.[ORS 181.99019)W 161.603) n .+t tLYG.Y..L7[....__.. ...............7..7C`'.... ........_............ uuY.Sl.t<.Zip rd, .,ter Any v,ol.tlun of OFC\.µI.'NS b 481.370.481.430-.po {87,15 ixludinff , tiv rn¢aCryt,n bu..n.+wu,e.t.lianr is pu+dJubk,upon lanvie- rn.b>.fine er net me a t=Sr or br ire .e n rot in the mustyvF................�t pn .........::. ........... ... ....................... I.u1 for nos more 0—60 d.» or both.ORS a61.99a(7). Si,_SHa+r Phorr NOTE: If this is a renewal do not complete 10 or 11 unless specifically required by the Motor Vehicles Division to do so. 10. RECOMMENDATION(To be completed if business is carried on within limits of the city) The Citv Council of the City of...................................................Oregon,does hereby recommend that a business license as a Wrecker of Motor Vehicles in the State of Oregon be issued to the applicant named in the within and foregoing application for such license. Dated at............................................................ .Oregon.this...............day [CITY SEAL] nf ................................................... .19.......... By......................................................................................&..................................... I MAYOR ATTEST: ............................................................................................................... _ CRY RECORDER /17.'RECOMMENDATION(To be completed it business is carried on outside of any incorporated city) The County Court of.................................................................................County.Oregon.does hereby recommend that a business license as a Wrecker of Motor Vehicles in the State of Oregon be issued to the applicant named in the within and foregoing application for such license. ATTEST: Datedat................................................................Oregon.this...............clay ........................................................... of 19.......... COUNry COUNTY COURT of ............................................................County.Oregon (COUNTY SEAL) By....................................................................................Title.............................. .................................................................................... 71tle.............................. ....................................................................................Title.............................. BUSINESS LICENSE FEE($20.00) . . . . . $..................... ($10.00,if starting after July Ist) LicenseNo. ......................................................................... F7334%3110-81, _ STATE OF OREGON ' Application for Business License as a Wrecker of - ,iJelion Motor Vehicles or Salvage Pool Operators Expires December 31, 1982 MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, Salem, Oregon 97314 Pursuant to provisions of OILS 481.345 to 481.370 inclusive,481.340 and 481.435,the undersigned hereby applies for a business license to carry on or conduct in the State of Oregon the business of wrecking,dismantling,permanently disassembling or substantially altering the forst of motor vehicles for the period ending December 31, 1982. 1. Name (� (/� v7 O Business Phone. ..._V._. ... .....(-�ation Ardfof.��d.-buaireme! �1 .I_. ph•.•�%7l' ./.idrz 2. Main business location L.l. 7.2.... .� t..L.....r�?.v..l,�i/ix .. ....../`�� Tl<c Gf....... G4'as Ns..�a.3 .... (SL—t and Number) (City) (County) 3. Mailing address/� 7..,Z...�c�v...6.rv-.&(�r......�j/. ......... '��.ri......4... ..............................................�(y.7 .. ..3............... (7 p Code) 4. Give the addresses of all additional locations of the business: (Street cid Number) (City) (Cnemty) ................................................................................................... .......................................................I..................... ........................................................................ ............. ...... ............................................................... .... ................... ........................................................................... . ................................................. ... 5. Check type of orgAr+iretion ......ndividual ❑ Par.. tnership ❑ Corporation 6. If corporation,give the name of the state under whose laws the corporation is organized ............................................................................................. Give the name and address of the managing agent or resident attorney-in-fad: Name ............................................................................ Title................................. Address---...............................----•-....................................... ................. ..... 7. IMPORTANT: Give name and residence address of all individual owners, partners or corporation officers: (Name) �Reeide Address) Mtle) .(.c.K.H.. .a......G..........T....J-�..o.ee ti!.. �.+tG�....................................... ....... ...................... 5�-.^�.E. z ................ ........................................ ................. ....�i�.. ............................... ...............-----.................................................... 8. The dimensions of the property on which the business is located are.a.0..Q...ft. x 0... ..ft. 9. I certify that I am the applicant or an authorized representative and that all information on this application is accurate. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE AN ENCLOSURE OR OTHER BAR- RIER AT LEAST SIX FEET IN HEIGHT THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORS 481.370 AND THAT THE RIGHT OF WAY OF ANY HIGHWAY ADJACENT TO THE LICENSED AREA IS UTILIZED EXCLUSIVELY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC PARKING. P. Name .r..c ...E.... .a.r..,!. ..�r.�............P�.EJ ' ..... r' Any peraun-bo knowingly makes any fate affidavit.or knowingi `........................... f` vM or affirms falae)y w any matter or thing required by ORS �. � .. I- .'��j�,. �Gi Chapter 461 to be sworn or affirmed to,commits a Clan C Falony and $Vicet Address....... ................. upon mnv(etian"I be abject to imprisonvocnt for not rt+c-a than five yearn.(ORS 481.990(9)and 161.605) �. .vr a.r.. ..........�Q.��................... f.'1 ....................... City.State.Zip Code Any violation of ORS 461.365 to 481.370.461.430 or 431.435 including the engaging in businme without a license is punidrable.upon oonvie ...e ..._. x� tz��.��fc., tion.by w fire o[roc rnone thm azao or by. it eha musty ..................... .. ...... .•...... ... ........ . jail for not more than 60 days,ar bath.O 481.990(3). Signature v !intra Ffnne ROTE: If this is a renewal do not complete 10 or 11 unless specifically required by the Motor Vehicles Division to do so. ECOMMENDATION (To be completed if business is carried on within limits of the city) The City Council of the City of....................................................Oregon,does hereby recommend that a business license as a Wrecker of Motor Vehicles in the State of Oregon be issued to the applicant named in the within and foregoing application for such license. Dated at............................................................ ,Oregon.this...............day (CITY SEAL] of ................................................... .19.......... By.............................................................................................................................. MAYOR ATTEST: ............................................................................................................... CrrY REW DER RECOMMENDATION (To be completed if business is carried on outside of any incorporated city) The County Court of .................................................................................County.Oregon.does hereby recommend that a business license as a Wrecker of Motor Vehicles in the State of Oregon be issued to the applicant named in the within and foregoing application for such license. ATTESr: Dated at..............................................................,Oregon,this...............day _. . _.................. ........................................................................._.... of ............................................................ .19.......... COUNTY CLERK COUNTY COURT of ............................................................County,Oregon [COUNTY SEAL] By.................................................................................... Title.............................. .................................................................................... Title.............................. ( Title.............................. BUSINESS LICENSE FEE($20.00) . . . . . $..................... (310.00, if starting after July 1st) LicenseNo. ......................................................................... F — s EPICO�lI7E1, LL / . OYOA ENcourrrER. INC. O� COLUMBIA ENCOUNTER Y AS I HAVE LOVED YOU November 19 , 1982 e Mayor Wilbur A. Bishop P . 0 . Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 s Dear Mayor: We are writing on behalf of Worldwide Marriage Encounter to ask that you join the nation ' s 49 governors in proclaiming Sunday, February 13, 1983, as "World Marriage Day" in Oregon. As you may be aware , last year Oregon joined in proclaiming "We Believe in Marriage Day" along with almost all the governors of this coun atry and the mayors of most of our nation' s cities . This year we have renamed the day "World Marriage Day" in recognition of the international support and recognition this effort has gathered . Last year' s day generated much favorable publicity in Oregon, and we are sure this year' s celebration will be even more successful. Worldwide Marriage Encounter, the world' s largest pro-marriage organ- ization, is affiliated with twelve different religious denominations, including Catholic , Lutheran , Methodist and Presbyterian, and has more than two million participants . Worldwide Marriage Encounter is open to all married couples seeking to strengthen their marriage and family life . Stable marriages are the foundation of our society, and they, in turn, ionshis. We re sure you faware of oser solid negative effect t thattseparation and adivorce have are l on the social and t g economic growth in Oregon . Your proclamation will be the cornerstone of a statewide public relations cam ai using all . mass media, to proclaim the value of marriage in Oregon . We have enclosed suggested wording for this proclamation, which can be adapted at your discretion . If you require further information, please call us at (503)285-0238 . Thank you for your consideration . Very truly yours, 5;7, Darrell and Joanie Badertscher i it••hG 1 IIIc 1{it C 1Jf�. �\ti. �.�'•" Itll:f/ tWf� i''�9ttf 'ytiii 4a-�'J,,,,11t�lt�e.y�•�It1fh��t1{ ��-:may (�,�rr+-^�?� F� � lww.`..� �"°a � �,�1 .s+�., ,s� +,ti,��i,��,`.s�' �"I ,L�•C3" .;`��„��../sB s9� j.4F.}Sf. w;:. � �r i-- �2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PROCLAMATION rI WHEREAS, the foundation of America's greatness is the • strength of its families; and WHEREAS, the family is established on the marriage til relationship between father and mother; and =.;ip • WHEREAS, there is an urgent need to reverse the present p. trend of separation and divorce that is sweeping e the country; and ?.M1IltiPJ :, WHEREAS, marriage should be viewed as a life-long :..r.;- 1*�}N:%%•-" commitment between husband and wife, filled with ?;sib mutual respect and open communications; and WHEREAS, it is our hope that the institution of marriage once again be recognized as the basis of American society; x�lilLf�r NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILBUR A. BISHOP, Mayor of the City of }"iuf1 ` d�t•�••-' Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim February 13, 1983, as "World Marriage Day" in Tigard, and call upon all citizens isp throughout Tigard to support efforts to promote the <: permanence and stability of marriage. �i9111 i I aic _ Wilbur A. Bishop, Mayor City of Tigard, Oregon 3��IIU RAI i T- Dea Planningcommission and C • tv T . a) ci t Tann nc- U 1.rec to r Copies to 1;ouncil members, Alli AQ] U ai r.nen and members , ( i �,• Al 1 �' - A l.etl;er sent to you on October 11. , -1 382 tel(-,,' o{' a need for an ordinance to cover "accessory 'bu.i16iro-s" . 2 agriculture or light manufactur. inF industrial 4 pole r.letal unattached structures were put up in i3-10 residential established neighborhood. The building% rermit application allowing this structure was dated 8-1-80 shows: Occupancy M-l ; Land Use 'Lone R-10; Bldg:. Type 5(S)N; Fire Zone 3; Plan check by dwh. New structure is indicated and an X is marked indicating usage as storage. Slab floor; height 121 (appears much higher) ; 1 stor„r, area 576 and value S4 ,000.00. Setbacks front 81, rear 65, left side 50 and right side 101 . Accessory buildings may be put up not to exceed 1,000 square feet. There are no restrictions as to materials, design, just consideration given on setbacks to qualify for a permit? Considered ' temporary' buildings these structures do not address the Oregon Uniform Building Code? Even though a permit was given for ' storage ' ingress and egress rock roads were placed on the 101 side yards for vehicle entry Vehicles are kept within this structural addition against Fantasy Hill deed restriction which only allows attached garage with 2 cars? Once a landowner has broken the deed restriction it is up to surrounding neighbors to bring forth a civil law suit. This has cost us close to $500.00. and we are told will be close to $5,000.00 if we pursue a course to have this illegal structure removed. The restriction must be unanimously agreed to in our effort to renew the 1985 deed limitation. This is impossible to get being several neighbors have put up structures in the past few years illegally. The lawyer suggested an ordinance would correct problems of this type and assure homeowners of their rights without having to go thru civil courts. Beaverton and Lake Oswego allow less square footage for accessory buildings, lower heights than City of Tigard does? Both these cities have sight review design to adhere to by checking out view, air,light, as it affects adjacent property? Require fencing; and landscaping to reduce noise or glare and maintain the property in a character in keeping with the surrounding. area? How does the new Fire Code amended in 1980 address accessory structures? Another matter to address at this time would be "dish” type antenna. Lake Oswego has in their ordinance to be placed in rear yards, on the ground, and must be screened by landscaping. Hoping you will place accessory buildings under review for an ordinance that will address the above concerns. Currently there are no regulations on design or materials for accessory buildings. Accessory buildings should not be unsightly or create disharmony to its locations. Immediate action on these matters will be appreciated by homeowners in this vicinity and certainly throughout Tigard' s residential areas, c _ A1tLL11L u ri v bit EENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS INTRODUCES A NEW CONCEPT IN MULTIPLE HOME TELEVISION Ploy LVMy HOME can have Z4 CHANNELS of satellite television inclu4ir6 HBO, ESP 9 C I.KEMA CABLE NEWS, NETWORK, SHOWTIME . . - and mrqr others - FOR LESS THAN CABLE TV COST-S! The best part is that you and your neighbors OWN the complete system -- No MNTHLY CABLE COSTS THAT GO ON yORE'9F�t! MITERESTED? Call (503) 684 - 2997for more information and a relpresentative will contaot you. AL SATELLITE MTAnWrr SYSMIS 13o15 S.W. pacific Huey., Tigard, CR 97223 (503) 584-2997 s/'�llILDHNG PERMIT APPLICATION TIGARD" DATE =' 119 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE j'- OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE O :R .tea i: -3 :1 ` L 7;i*JOBADDRESS "��r� � I_�3(2i - -�: _ ARCHITECT ENC31NEER BUILDER ^'r - taDr �� ' -i:l� Li _ _ADDRESS� DESIGNER JriSfli)n P�1 :: ;trUCtUi STRUCTURE _ ❑ NEW C3 REMODkL/ ❑�QDDITiON ❑ IR E-1RENEWAL ❑ FIRE DAMAGE [3 DEMOLITION 0 RESIDENCE ❑ COMM ❑ EDUCATIO AL, ❑ GOV'T 'Q RELIGIOUS ❑ PA IO ❑ CARPORT ❑ GARAGE (n STORAGE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE OCCUPANCY !� LANDUSEZONE ft l( BL G.TYPE ' FI EZONE L PLAN CHECK BY di'Ih —HEAT -� LOn3truc� pole structur ' storays •building, all per plans anc code. SEWER PERMtT! _OCC LOAD l FLOOR LOAD s j b b HEIGHT -12 NO.STORIES I AREA 37-3 NO.BEDROOMS -- " VALUE► ,L 0 r,. BUILDING DEPARTMENT SETBACKS FRONT 61 REAR 6 1 LEFT SIDE j Q RIGHT SIDE 1 O Permit .`26.10L THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULA.;:mS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE,ZONING REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES,AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Pian Check 14. Of) WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE Sub-total .+ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS.CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS LICENSE.SEPARATE PERMITS REAUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING. State Tax-> SDC = Total 1= pDC# APPLICANT OR AGENT it By .` .:� i Receipt No. ADDRESS PHONE E f EE I r. i i ' f ¢ LA/y CITY OF Francis 4.4Z�r PORT A ND' OREGON Carl Goebel,Administrator E,.�. �l 1800 S.W. 6th Portland,Oregon 97201 z sul�.� OF wA-IIER w®wcs c�os� 24s-4178 --- `_. November 29, 1982 DEC 2 1982 Robert W. Jean City Administrator City of Tigard P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Bob: The Water Bureau is willing to approve your request for an extension of the waiver granted in our May 7, 1982, letter to the City of Tigard. Accordingly, the City of Tigard will be allowed an additional 90-day period from December 25, 1982, to March 25, 1983, to review its long- term water needs and stipulate the percentage of water it intends to contract from the City of Portland. Such percentage must, of course, be equal to or greater than any percentage contracted by the Tigard Water District during the intervening period. Sincere Carl Goebel , Ad 'nistrator CG:mg cc: Mayor Frank Ivancie Chris Thomas, City Attorney November 30, 1982 MEMORANDUM " . TO: City Council FROM: Planning Staff qV 4 SUBJECT: Status Report, NPO's & CCI Over the last several months the Planning Staff has been working hard towards the completion of the Citywide Comprehensive Plan. A major part of that work has centered around the input of the CCI (Committee for Citizens Involvement) and the NPO's (Neighborhood Planning Organization.) Several issues relating to the NPO's have been brought before City Council recently. Specifically regarding membership status and the role of the NPO's. The following is a summary of the CCI and NPO membership and activities. CCI The role of the CCI is to monitor and evaluate the City's overall citizen involvement program. Normally the CCI meets for an hour on the third Thursday of each month. However, over ing for eve in tast two months the to go over Comp. CI Planasbeen issues. The CCI two hours every Thursday g membership is made up of all of the NPO Chairpersons, the Park Board Chairman, two City Councilors and a Planning Commission Member. Attendance to the CCI meetings has regularly been around eight members. Given the amount of Comp. available to review it, the CCI has acted as Plan information and short time { monitor and evaluator and has been asked to reach a consensus on issues prior to Planning Commission review. The CCI has given staff direction on many issues which may otherwise have been unresolved prior to public hearings before the Planning Commission. i NPO's NPO # 1 - NPO #1 has been active since its inception in 1975. Currently, NPO #1. An eighth member has been there are seven approved members serving on recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. The Chairperson is John } Butler, the Vice Chairperson/Secretary is Harry Owen. NPO #1 has been meeting regularly the first Wednesday of every month with some special meetings to cover Comp. Plan issues. NPO #2 - At the present time, there are only two approved NPO #2 members. However, staff has received two additional applicantions and will be interviewing those two candidates on Friday, December 3, 1982. On more than one occasion ostafPlanhas issuesindicated gowever, no meetings have been held.current NPO 4�2 members on Cmp NPO #3 - NPO #3 was reactivated in January of 1982 primarily due to opposition of the Bechtold/Walnut Island annexation. Currently, there are seven approved NPO #3 members. Regular meetings are held on the 3rd Wednesday of every The ( month. However, NPO #3 has been meeting almost weekly the past two months to Lou ne Mortensen review Comp- Plan issues. The NPO #3 Chairperson is is Bob Bledsoe. A large portion e of landwithin the Vice Chairperson/Secretary NPO #3 boundaries is not in the City but is within the Urban Growth Boundary. i S NPO 464 - NPO 464 has been active since its formation in 1975. Currently, there are 12 approved members in NPO 464. Regular meetings are held the first Wednesday of the month. Special meetings have been held frequently over the past several months to review Comp Plan issues. The areas of major concern to r1PO 464 members are transportation and the conversion units. The NPO 464 t- Chairperson is Gordon Martin, the Vice Chairperson is Rick McMahan and the s Secretary is Dave Brook. g NPO 465 - The original NPO #5 group was disbanded in 1978 because the NPO 465 Plan had been adopted and the group saw no reason to continue meeting. On February 23, 1981 four people were approved for membership to NPO 465. Although four members do not constitute an active NPO, John Smets was notified by mail of all activity occurring within the NPO 465 area. However, no meetings were held so the four members appointed in February 1981 forfeited g their membership. In 1982, seven new members for NPO 465 were approved by City Council. Of the four previous members, two have resubmitted for membership. Bill Bieker has reapplied and will be interviewed on December 3. John Smets will be submitting a new application. John Havery has declined to reapply if John Smets will be or. the NPO. On July 21, 1982 those seven certified members elected Chris Vanderwood as Chairperson, Craig Hopkins as Vice Chairperson and Sharon Takahashi as Secretary. NPO 465 holds regular meetings the third Wednesday of every month but has been meeting more frequently the last two months to deal with Comp. Plan issues. The major issue concerning NPO 465 was the Plaid Panty business locating at SW Hall and Bonita. NPO 466 - NPO 466 was reactivated in July 1981 primarily to halt a proposed residential development in the area which residents felt was too dense. There are seven members at the present time. The Secretary, Faith Holmes will be :. resigning as of December 1, 1982. The Chairperson, Phil Pasteris will be resigning his Chairmanship as of January 1, 1983. However, he will continue to serve on the NPO. Phil Pasteris expressed his concern with the fact that he was inclined to be more supportive of staff than area residents on the Durham Plaid Pantry liquor license and that he felt he would be more effective as an NPO member. NPO 467 - NPO #7 was reactivated in June 1982. Currently, there are six approved members. City staff has no pending applications for new members. Nancy Robbins is the Chairperson, Barbara Priest is the Secretary. Regular meetings of NPO 467 are held on the third Wednesday of every month. ch (0051P) I EECEi VED November 22, 1982 C11Y OF CITY OF T IGARD Tigard, Oregon RE: Letter of Resignation, Effective Dec. 1, 1982 To whom it may concern, I have been a active member of NPO #6 for the past year, serving as thier secretary. Due to a recent increase in workload at my present place of employment, and combined with several other factors directly relating to my own time management and preservation of attitude. I must decline from my present involvement with NPO #6, as well as city concerns in general. I'm hoping to have the opportunity to volunteer again, but for now it is simply a matter of not having that time to give. I trust, you will all do a good job regardless of my presence. I've enjoyed working with everybody and look forward to living in Tigard for many years to come. Special recognition to Liz Newton, Jeremy Coursolle, and Bob Jean. You guy's are real assets to our little city here. Hopefully, we will continue to replace other questionable staff members with people of your overall expertise, high energy levels, and genuine concern. Tha"n"k you, Faith A. Holmes 9830 S.W. Durham Road Tigard, Oregon P.S . Please disregard my application for Budget Committee as well. oil MEMORANDUM a TO: City Council FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: S.D.C. Refund - Floberg DATE: December 2, 1982 It is herewith recommended that the City Council authorize refund of $3,427.00 to Lasal Land Company of the Northwest; said amount being qualified and creditable under Cahpter 3.20 of the Tigard Municipal Code. November 4 , 1982 Mr. John Hagman City of Tigard 12755 SW Ash P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: System Development Charge Rebate Pacific Highway & SW 78th Street Development Dear John: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of this date and in accordance with a letter dated July 17 , 1982 re- garding a rebate on the system development charge , spe- cifically portions that have been advanced by the land owner, I would request that said credit to date, which to my understanding is $3 , 427 , be paid to Lasal Land Company of the Northwest. Please have said check mailed in care of William C . Floberg, Preece & Floberg , 2300 SW First Avenue, Suite 220 , Portland, OR 97201 . Based on our telephone conversation, I assume I have answered your questions and a check from the city will be forthcoming. If other information is required, please- let me know. Thank you for your help. Very truly yours, LASAL LAND COMPANY OF/ THE NORTHWEST William C. Flobefg WCF/am r M--�MM T0: City of Tigard DATE : july 19 , 19�i2 RE : Application for Systems (levelopment Chargr. Cr, dit Commercial Service Center 78th Street & 99 W This application is based upon costs associated with the construction of 78th Street between Pfaffle and 99 W to collector standards and for oversizing of 105 linear feet of sidewalk along 99 W. The elements comprising this application consist of: Street - extra base rock costs - extra paving costs - extra labor and equipment costs Sidewalk - extra concrete costs - extra labor costs (finishing) . The areas considered oversized are: 203 lineal feet of 78th Street X 10 Feet wide; and 105 lineal feet of sidewald adjacent to 99 W (Note: Total length of oversize sidewalk along 99 W is considerably greater-, however, this application covers work done under contract by R. A. Gray & Co. only. ) Total oversized costs for which this application is submitted equal C6; .41,2.99-and have been computed as follows: Street 603 Base Rock - 2830 sq.ft. x 12" i)27 = 104.81 cu. yds. 104 .81 cu. yds. X $5.75/cu. yd• = 5 600 Labor & Equip. estimated to eq K rock costs= $2,009 Paving Costs - 2830 sq. ft. x .71/sq. t. Total Street Credit = $3,212 Sidewalk Concrete - 105 linear feet X 3 feet wide = 315 sq.ft. 315 sq.ft. X .33 104 cu. ft. - 27 = 3.83 cu.yds. 3.83 cu. yds . X 31 35.46/cu. yd. = $1,31 Finishing - 315 sq. ft. X 4) .25/sq. ft. - 79 TotalSidewalk Credit = 5215 Grand al : $3,212 Street + 215 Sidewalk s3,427 a' ._ity of Tigard Pale 2 July 19 , 1982 Supporting Documentation: 1) Cobb Rock Sample Invoice for Rock 2) Subcontract with Baker Rock for Paving* 3) Ross Island Concrete Invoice for Concrete 4) Cement Finishing Invoice from J & B Concrete *Paving sq.ft. cost computed as follows: Pfaffle - 680 L' X 5' wide patch pave = 3,400 sq.ft. 78th - 283 L' X 44' wide = 12,452 sq.ft. Total Square Feet = 15,852 sq.ft. $11 ,267 contract amount 15,852 sq.ft. = 71�/sq.ft. Lasal Land Co;. of. the Northwest r ESTIMATE OF CREDITS UPON FULL DEVELOPMENT Street $ 991 .00 1 inch overlay, 2,830 sq. ft. @ S.35/sq.ft. Sidewalk 320 lineal feet alo Pacific Hwy west of 78th plus 255 lineal feet i stalled along Pacific Hwy in conjunction with Far est Federal building. (575 lineal feet X 3 feet ide = 1 ,725 sq. ft. ) Finishing 431 .00 1 ,725 sq. ft. @ $.25/sq. ft. Concrete 1 ,725 sq. ft. X .33 = 569 cu. f 569 cu. ft. = 21 cu. yds. 27 745.00 21 cu. yds. X $35.46/cu. yd' TOTAL ESTIM. E $ 2,167.00 GRAND TOTAL ALL CREDITS $ 5,594.00 December 2, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director/City Recorder SUBJECT: Council Expenses Councilor Stimler has asked to discuss the issue of Council expenses and the following is a summary of expenses since July 1 , 1981 . Bishop Brian Cook Scheckla Stimler July 1981 45.93 Aug. 35. 15 Sept. 84.02 Oct. 36.07 Nov. 23.35 137.00 Dec. 4.00 Jan. 1982 40. 17 Feb. 68.53 March 59.26 April 81 .69 May 89.90 June Sub Total 568.07 -0- -0- -0- 137.00 July 1982 85.28 Aug. 103.52 Sept. 68.54 Oct. 76.45 Sub Total 16 months 333.79 -0- -0- -'0- -0- Total Expenses 901 .86 -0- -0- -0- -0- Budgeted Amt. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1982-83 2000.00 M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, BUDGET COMMITTEE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1982 SUBJECT: MID-YEAR 1982-83 BUDGET REVISIONS As we discussed during the Budget process, the City's contingency funds are at an all time low, and this year's Budget has required close attention. Based on the first five months of information, total revenues are down from budgeted amounts by $87,646 or about 2%. This is not too bad, given the continuing uncertain economy, but the variations are not an even 2% by fund. The General Fund is down $106,960 or 41%, so most of the needed adjustments will have to occur in General Fund related areas. The slow economy has also worked some to our advantage. Equipment purchase prices are coming in way below reasonable Budget estimates and construction project bids are continuing below estimates. The failure of the 1J% property tax limit means we can now continue with LID projects which were tabled, allowing us to firm up some of those previously uncertain finances. All of this allows some reallocation of resources to occur between funds and programs. Approximately $50,000 in program cuts will still be necessary, however, to keep this year's Budget in balance. Attached to this memo is the summary information reporting the changes I have directed within what I consider to be the limits of my authority. No formal Budget Committee or Council action is needed, although I want to make sure that you are adequately informed. The major changes involve: ® Police cuts of $29,118 or 2#% by freezing a vacant position and implementing some reorganizational changes; e Legal Services increased by $8,000 after last month's review by Council ; m Waste Water cut by $14,000 to offset added costs for setting up new Storm Drain fee accounts and legal services share; ® Parks cut $30,000 by staff turnover freeze and shift of some major equipment capital outlay from General Fund to Parks Fund; Public Works Shops/Support increased $12,000 for Auto Service Worker, offset from Parks staff attrition and delay in Superintendent hiring; o Contingency total cut $26,528 to $79,460; • All other programs squeezed for $8,000 in cuts or forced to absorb unforeseen expenses within Budgeted amounts. . . . Continued . . . C MEMO--MID-YEAR 1982-83 BUDGET REVISIONS NOVEMBER 30, 1982 PAGE TWO The commitment remains to use remaining contingency fund amounts to avoid service level reductions or layoffs where those employee groups took a pay plan freeze or contract rollback. The Police union contract remains unsettled at this writing and will have to be absorbed within the Department's new control Budget estimate of $1,080,000. Obviously, the longer we go without a settlement, the greater the likelihood of some service level change or layoff. Hopefully, this too will all be resolved and any further adjustments accomplished by our next meeting in : February. RWJ : dkr Attachment 1, f i' k S v i Y 5 F Contingency - A11 Operating Funds BUDGETED SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE CONTROL VARIANCE & CHANGES ESTIMATE _ GENERAL FUND-LID 37778 6227 44005 29296 ( 14709) FEDERAL REV. SHARING -0- 12858 12858 -0- ( 12858)* STATE TAX STREET -0- 22794 22794 791 (22003) COUNTY GAS TAX -0- 4170 4170 170 ( 4000) COUNTY LEVY 385 -0- 385 385 -0- MAJOR STREETS SDC 7276 -0- 7276 276 ( 7000) PARKS SCD # 1 7250 -0- 7250 -0- ( 7250)** PARKS SDC #2 7250 -0- 7250 -0- ( 7250)** SEWER 16558 (3700) 12858 48542 35684 CONTINGENCY 76497 42349 118846 79460 (39386) *FUND BALANCE TRF. OUT FROM MOTORCYCLES **PARKS EQUIPMENT 12/2/82 F 4 a O a O rl > y I CO! E4 0 W y T u V O 0 a p a m u u u u 7 + w a m 6 a C a a q O G 4 Y 7 0 a H d d N N y N O Y Ir O d a O y O 4 31 ri H a s m m m m m o 6L. odo . O 7 - Y O a a e a ,y c '� o o s a per-/ m Rei Y d°. m m b F CI m O u pa, O viS O G G C C bo a y r. M m Y O < m M r) d M tl m N N 0 W C O O O va AM, 3 O G 6 H G G a L. a m 0 0 0 a T L o d o „m„ O O O b > > J ba 60 be bo to ko b D m D b m EO m W Ir j O 4 T C� U 05 11. N m 1.4 N Vl 40! < N to m _ .. .. O m O m 0O 'OO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N C e m d d ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N b E O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 {) 1 1 1 1 1 �O n O n P e N rI C '"1 N N rI O O d N 1 .. a H v O m (�., N N e o O O vMi �p O 0 n of C Q Vf �O M N M Ch 4 O P 0 O m O e N O ri e P �O n M e IA M `O O ! M rl n O M P to O N N I N O N O N M L M r♦ n Ifl d N m �O P rl O N O r4 In M M rd ri 10 rl M Vl n n N In �O P rn �O d 0m M N 0 1 �O m N N n� on 14 N In rl m 4 d M rO1 n M N m N 1 N n n m N ra r� 6 i F 14 4 m rl C O O �O O m 1� M e e M 10 M N M m B pp p. O B O P M O �O M e 'Q ri -a O P O N O rl e a %O r �O pI B In N m r'1 P N e n ref �O O ri Vt of N ,..1 N O N M n d C C O P U N r♦ n ra Cf P O O N 1 O' p. n n B M O vl n ra �1 n m P N v+ N ON v+ O m T 'nrl n m C �O P P N B OI d O O N V+ N n C N �O rl n 0 �+ O n V1 N N O I d tFt QI M rl N -a n 0 N N N r♦ M ri of N d r♦ H M N .-1 N N N H C O O m JA ymzY!U Mrr♦l O1I ePnNN Onrdi dnM nM 0Pd 1 I1 Idif OPd M Cm 4O Sm 0 Y en �O 1 1 OH I OOr'1 10 MCN P O P O O1 -a OM N O O O 14 OI em w e two 0 0 0 o N o 0 o M o 0 o e ri d o m o o n nn e e v+ co M N M n o [y N of O m n O rl V1 d O e M B O e �m O P `O OOiO NN C OPri n m P O M ri m N N Vf 1� 0 of e P N 0 0 0 co M N In m n N rl 4 n C M 0 O ri M N n P�1I �O {Mil H N �O d N N n P �O BI P N m m OL,u m °o- N : _ m �. d a m Y a o H y a as b y w a m o Y O L .0 m Y pmq I O d +� Y b0 d Y Y CS ..� Y tl Ti y 0 0 0 4 .Vi m 0 w Alai d O O w ..Oi r01 V O ..ai L b OD+� O 4 i m r31 u d 0 u .N a O Y CO y U i O Y Y Y m C G C T O O an d OI p Y Pi m ri O m m d m Q a L 0 .li d.w .w w : m 0 bp U d 4 1:11, b Z1 O 0, w e L 9 9 Y O '2 a < m a o X Y m O m a Q 0 dt d Y 1 L < .'� m O. m m q O 3 m 0 0 G O w C .ar o 1 i4 Z A. Rte. 0. � Y p U U a p owd o03 c°J U Od. m o H V fd ppp6 d tr Iii .a m N H O U U O U O < r4 CITY OF TIGARD Tentative 1983 - 84 Budget Calendar Date Agenda Items i z 12/82 Budget Histories and 1983-84 Data s 1/3/83 Budget Guidelines 1/3/83 Dept. Budget Request for 1983-84 1/20/83 Publish City Administrator's Proposed Use Federal Revenue Sharing R 1/17-21/83 City Admin. Review Requests with Department Heads 1/24/83 Proposed 83-84 Budget Balance 1/26/83 Proposed Budget to Type 2/1/83 Publish Notice of Budget Meeting & Public Hearing on use of State & Federal Revenue Sharing Funds Proposed Budget to Printers. 2/3/83 Proposed Use Hearing at City Hall for Federal Revenue Sharing f 2/10/83 Budget Committee: Budget Message Revenue Detail & Overview of Expenditures Social Service Requests Public Hearing Federal & State Revenue Sharing Funds 2/17/83 Budget Committee - Community Service 2/24/83 Budget Committee - Community Development 3/3/83 Budget Committee - Policy & Administration, General Government, Debt Service & Contingency 3/10/83 Budget Committee: General Discussion Overview & Pass Recommend Budget 3/17/83 Publish Summary & Notice of Budget Hearing 3/29/83 Publish Supplementary Notice of Budget Hearing 4/4/83 City Council Public Hearing on Recommended Budget & Use of Revenue Sharing Funds Proposed 83-84 Budget Calendar (Continued) Alternative Dates if 5/17/83 election fails 4/11/83 City Council Determines Levy & Adopt Resolution calling for election 4/13/82 File Resolution calling for levy election with County Election Officer 5/25/83 5/6/83 Post & Publish for Election 6/16/83 5/17/83 Hold Election 6/28/83 5/23/83 Declare Election Results 6/30/83 6/27/83 City Council Adopts Budget, Makes 6/30/83 Appropriations, Levies Taxes By 7/15/83 Submit Levy, appropriation resolution 7/15/83 & budget l is i I t F C p N In N C O M M In O C• O N a M 0 0 0 O W w m y O N N h 'D m o n N O O O OII D m ll m CII O Q C mIii O U m - _- - - M O In O Z coil m m r-1 C cmi mil co X C m m rll M O m C 01 Cl 11 r O mil N r C`II m Q O m - N O .-I 1D r m m G1 a, N Q\ 0 0 0 0 O II :A --I .'�II m II O W C ID M .--� C O 1D O O 1::' O II NII r '+ m II O In F 1D �!) ti h m O M V' N h N r C N N O O O Q roll Ill m MII C X11 O Q U 1 ti r h 1r- C 10 O 11'1 O Z MII r r-I m II C r ..-111 O 41 co rj In M 1p N C .--I m m .--I N .--I O r N M m r Ir OII Ol C)11 Ill Ol I II 01 x O m c .+ M m 1D 11 1D O U II O iD r II 111 Q m W .--I N N I ill M Cii ~11 p C C 1p co O N Ol IP Vl O M O M Q` 0 0 0 I CII 1D h M11 13 h11 O W W Ifl M C m O M N m Ol N m N N M O O O coil M 10 OII m M .--III O V3 H 111 h N 1D ul O N m M C`. "'i M In 1D 14 m 0 0 0 Q 10II O O O II U O r II O co Q W 1 m r N m r 1D Q' M r C N 1fl h C O O O In Z MII m m mil Ul m AO n CN N N J O Cl h O C 1D O In ."1 C N 1D N C MII In N m II O :11 1D 11 O x O m CO m .-I M m .--III 1D h MII 10 CII 111 - 11111 M CII f-I II .-I It n u u M O O C 1D 111 1O 111 ID .--i 0 0 0 O II O M MII r O h 11 O W O ,N'1 o r h CD C r M N M m r+ 0 0 0 -ii o C1 11111 0 E C m M O O O N m O M O Ill ::i Q m II m 11 .('1 r r II o >+ \ -11 -II NII O W W ml 111 C 1D N N C M C m 111 m 10 M O N O O Z CA O co m 11 •-+ O M h C M C 1D II N In rII m t 0 111 a G � co r :4 0 C h r+1 .-I C N r r+ M r hII 1D C OII 1D 1Do M11 II r a cii aii ii a O m h ID O r r - C IA C M N M h 'oil O 1D 1D II O 011 p M C O C1 co M N C':1 co C m 1D h 1D m O In 01 Q 11 In m CII In s 11 W M pl co O Ili m r': r C M 0 1D r N N m ti N C Q x II i0 MII 1 u'J 1D II F CO - - - - yl Il, 1 C .-+ r N C O O Ir m m r1 r O N M O T O Z NII In M 0111 1 ul IPII O N m O N to m 111 h C O C r O N m tf1 .--I N r C7, m C NII m mil p co O N N .-+ M N r 11 ~ _4 m co II d. Q r-I N CII C CII II u II E 0 U) CO 01 N co I CD r .-. m 0 •� In 111 r O C C N -it C M r 11 w m m h may. m M ,� 1D ,� m O 111 o, m m m N O NII C m NII m a N r N N O N 1D 111 O 1D N w C m 1D O 1D C 1 NII ClM NII Ey m 1 Ifl C 111 111 h h m 'D m C m r 111 m m r Ill 1 m h II N C r 11 I,y M r 1D 1D O O 111 M m N .--I r m OII O O OII E 111 1D M .-I 1D �..I C M OII Lf1 111 O11 p U m 01 M 1` yl - AlQ Iflll C .n l w I It a x w p CO O�1 O m O If) Ir Co Ifl m M •"I Ifl m M 1D h NII m C7' NII N N N M m 1D N m M C 1D 10 11 h m 1011 Z W N M O O M O C In 1D N 1D N M 1D C Cl Cl co Q NII co `NII 1 W W E. ml 111 O M 1D ID N N C In r m N C N C Z In II m r Al CD > I.7 M N N M h O1 1D .-I 111 .--I 1D M 01 M C N h M N II Ifl r 11 NII w p il m M m O N III II C In II 11 ti m 1D 1D m N 01 M - rn h In M M v co n rn rn m II .� In 1D C co O o C 1D M .-I 1p 10 O o m m 1011 co r 10II aQ r m 01 h 01 N m m N 1D h o N m o I C m 11 In M 0111 i co Q _ - - - - o -II '° o E O 1 N CO m O h 01 C r C C C C` N C C1 co r 1 N 1011 m co 1D II 1 F O 1D C m M CJ N M m m .J'1 h M m M 11 m ^ MII U m m Q ti CII C CII It r C 0 .T O 01 O O C O In m C C N M In r11 In N r II CO 1D r N N 10 CO CO N ID 1D m O 10 m :o It r .--1 m II a C, '-I M O 1D .+ M N m m N " 0 .-I 1D C1 m C 1 r h II r IIco 1 m 1 Vl ID C 1D M IA 01 O M m h Ifl m N M N N I O I-1 HOl M ti N 0 111 M M M In 111 N C lD co r M N 1p CII m 1D CII C N to mil .-I 'o m 11 Q MIIII M MII II m ; W m m Eil m \ p Q II m Z mil C, 1D W 811 > mII d mII N C W all a, 3U.. zll v w N •Z .Ill 7 OIt N a, m U) o a an L o li.0z In Q Y' N 2 O E W QII 7 'n II m m P7 H O Q p II U N ..711 N m F J N Z > d m Z II 1 m aII a, Z X 1. m > E- Q) o ••11 N 'CII X ..1 W d co U 7 E m N N C Cr M F coli N X II m a, £ E 10 ii m m it E N W \ U3 cu t>. M m .y p Z 1 m mil 110 F ..11 m U y t to 3 .in.1 t„ d a E 0 O o II 1 Loll 0 1v M > FII X C Wit 0 7 0 W `a m Q > C aJ a, In O C tS Q O P. m m MII m O U II U Of a W ✓ a, Y W.'I c E 12 O W W Cl 11 E Z mil N \ W cWf3 N U a i O p E to N U >� > ZII .y-1 b 7 C c E- p r+ U O WII -• Oil 7 w ^ M_ U L m F >I Q 3 U3 D. m w c I Z w > Z FLIT m m yll U N 7C p C C U IT. tF-I 3 3 3 3 3 3 �U 12 p m W In x II ..1 ..1 WII Q Z Iti ^O 7 O W O W WII O O Mil E f7 E W j p,1 w E ,.7 m m t]. P. fL P. D. W W U) �" 3 m Iz-I 2 .-711 F E all Im. 3 a E IU•1 7.1 EI E W 1211 QII Q+ O Q O E £ a E-1 CD Z > Ep II Ep- O FpQ U O Iy U p OU a Ell EII a. Q E m U Small b , M ISE HAAS & ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS SUITE 445-AGC CEN'T'ER WILSONVILLE. OREGON 97070 9450 S.W. COMMERCE CIRCLE (503) 682-2450 December 2, 1982 Frank A. Currie, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Tigard 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Frank: Attached herewith is Estimate No. 6 for work completed during the month of November, 1982 for improvements on City of Tigard LID 21 - S.W. 72nd Avenue Street Improvements. Although the check should be sant to our office, it should be payable to Columbia Excavating, Inc. Sincerely, ,? � .................. � z/ MARLIN J. /DE HAAS, P.E. MJD/slc Attachment cc: 80.194.118 f ovc rsi 1e �ttL' vn I 12 -D69-92, Anpr& "llIII l►III7{III1IIIj11dI1fPIt[1 IiliriPfll+jlfr IiIj3T+ II�TTT jm flTjll+ )ITfriq I N �li�rll I(i 11 iil�+B► Itr�aij+l+�+11{1l+�+h{.Ifl�111{1f+�If+{►1+'+fIj111�711i1+7111{1ll�+pt{dn NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - THE QUALITY OF T1£ ORIGINAL DRAWING. - oC sz ez cz sz sz bz CZ z�z—iz—oz ar`el —cf __91_ �f____�+ £f__ Z1 _.11 01_6 a __9._ 5 b _ _e z eNl,ilB{II11,1111{IIIIIlU1{NN,NN{IllEfl{IJtt lflttltut�eul��riY!2L+�t1��ieMtiFLdlltlitltlN��*�lfu 1 t�51t14{Aatt� lilt1�4i3,N ,NII{Ilti,i�lP{gIf�IRIi{INII11itlflfl IV 1 f j199 t - - f CITY OF TIGARD LID 21--S.W. 72nd Avenue WORK PROPOSED WORK COMPLETED SHEET?,oF?SHEETS Area Street Improvements PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRICE DOLLARS LUNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS REMARKS SCHEDULE 1 GRADING & PAVING IMPROVEM tT 1. SITE PREPARATION 1.1 Clearin & Grubbing L.S. A 4 0 --- --- 1.2 Common Excavation O C.Y. 12,981 6,32 70% 1.4 Embankment C.Y. _i8 087 8659 4,935.63 423 1 241.11 9082 5,176.74 1.5 Aeration of Sub rade Hrs. 20 _ 2. BASE & LEVELING COURSE I --- 2.1 1%-" - 0" Crushed Rock C.Y. �12.011 2.2 314" - 0" Crushed Rock C.Y. t 6.211 - -_ ( (Alternate Bid in Lieu of Items I 2.1 & 2.2) 1"-0" Crushed Rock C.Y. 18 222 2.3 Subgrade Stabilization C.Y. 1007 50 3 7 822.50 P5117 4462 3,465.00 1505 2 1379 11,666.34 5578 47,189-M 3. A.C. PAVEMENT Tons 15 93_6-_.1_2828__8452 4. CURBS.1 Standard Concrete Curb 13 560.05 1792 4.748-80 690 4.2 (Standard Concrete Curb (MatchQaM Existing Pavement) L.F. 4 2 -- � --- --- --- --- 5. CATCH BASTNS (GB-1) I Each 66 316.24 2O 871.84 3 4,111.12 6 g97 44 � 6. CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS S.F. 9 710 1.60 15,536.00 2240 3,584.00 1445 2,312.00 j3685 5 896.00 7. RELOCATE FENCE L.F. 840 4.40 3 696.00 265 1,166.00 --- 312 8. MANHOLE•RECONSTRUCT 265 1,166.00 Each I_ 21 500.00 10 500.00 "- -'- 4 2 00.00 9. MANHOLE ADJUST Each 18 150.00 --- --- i l l i°' I i i i.Ll•i_i i i.�., i ; �ilt 1ji�1 r P i -r� t _..� `__ _- --,-_ _I �iT�l�i�3�t;l�lllil�'J n��'It)��tlllill�llrl�t'i{tii9fPOtitIr�11iI11iI9 h�Alllillifiiiafliali�lil(Ila'If l{It111tiirli�Haii 11 e 2 mo on 2 1 DRAWNOTEIF THIS CLEAR -----.___ i 2 3 4 -. _ 5 6. 7 8 9 f0 i i ..- 12`. - DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR 7HAN i - THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL _ DRAWING. oFe 6? 82 tZ 92 SZ bZ £Z ZZ IZ 02 61 81- LI --91 -Sf' bl £I ZI ;1_ 00 -6 8 rNi7t11i1H11�1111111lI�II11{tHi�aaiEI156t utilyu�su!__ Il •! t. 1 M"1111 MARLAI ilLllilll .• _ l 1 CITY OF TIGARD LID 21-- S.W. 72nd Avenue WORK COMPLETED SHEET 2 OF L SHEETS Area Street Improvements_ WORK PROPOSED PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS 10. TRAFFIC CONTROL PAVEMENT MAR I G 10.1 The word "STOP" (Thermoplastic) Each --- --- --- --- --- 10.2 Arrows for Left Turn (Thermoplastic 2 _-- ___ -__ 10.3 Arrows for Two-way Left Turn — (Thermoplastic) Each 110 --- --- --- --- --- --- 10.4 "R X R" Legend for RR X'in s. (Thermoplastic) Inn _:_ ___ ___ I ___ ___ 10.5 9" Line (Thermoplastic) ___ ___ ___ __- 10.6 112' Line ThermoDlasticl L.F. 140p ___ ___ ___ 10.7Yellow Raised Reflectors ___ ___ ___ -__ ___ 10.8 Yellow Raised Nonreflective Marker I ___ ___ ___ ___ 11. TRAFFIC CONTROL 40n on 0 6.120.00 30% $ 6,120.00 12. GATE ADJUSTMENT B49+57L.S. A i --- --- --- I --- --- _-- 13. REINFORCED C NCR TE B49+0 C.Y. 2 q4.8nn On _-_ 14. 48-1 CHAIN --- --- --- --- --- 15. A.C. PATCHING S.Y. 60 17 36041.60 --- --- --- --- --- --- 16. REMOVE EXISTING A.C. S.Y. 1,830 0.60 I 1,098.00 1350 810.00 --- --- 1350 810.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE I 762.50j i SCHEDULE II STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1. TRENCH EXCAVATION & BACKFILL 1.1 Clearin q & Grubbin ,S, 80% 8,000.00 --- 80% 8,000.00 s � yy 11 99 I-- 1 i 1 � I � i � � 1 � 1-'. ��-.l��Il�t�71i i�t jJil��i,ililll��Iillltlill tlt llJl Jlt�ili iii�lllilli Iltiilllili'itl Ililil rl lti�iti,$ Y t I i NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -- --. .� 2 3 4 5 6 ] i o DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - Tif QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ' DRAWING. •..- - 0F£ 62 ez GZ 8? SZ t'? £Z zz 13 OZ of—ei—EI - 91 Sf to £1 21 11 01 — 6 8 -9 - S t" .0 z II."-•,aa� F tlnllUl�Ilil�gli�lili�11111FNt�iiihti i ININ _ N y�;p1 ! t1j17t�1]1111 -MARCH i ) 14%90 Ell i I ., t: CITY'OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Avenue WORK COMPLETED SHEET__!W�F_ZSHEETS Area Street Improvements WORK PROPOSED PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS REMARKS 1.2 Trench Excavation a 0-6 Feet Dee b) 6-8 Feet D • 147 227.85 5872 9,101.60 C -10f9et Deep JA71 2.924.2.q 1671 2,924.25 d 10-12 Feet Dee 971 1,990,55: --- "- 9 99 F 6]� 0.55 -- _-- -rrr nn 5. Feet Deep- 4F r _ 292 963.6( --- 4.2 196 823.20 --- --- 2 6-LLEr --- --- h) Catch Basin Laterals F= l.s35 _ 22 --- --- --- SO G "ass 3 Rae-kf* 11.010 30 277.50 147 404.25 11 157 30 681.75 1 Q-6 F _ 524I 1778 4,267.2 147 352.801925 4 620.00 5 669.75 -- 2 264 1,042.80 --- --- 5 12-14 Feet Dee L.F. 165 4.95 816.75 149 737.55 "- --- Rog I 49 737.55 6 i4-16 feet Dee L.F 2 7 1 117 --_ i --- 7 16-18 Feet Deep L.F. 185 9.45 1 748.25 58 493 10 --- -- 117 A30-7n - c Class 4 Back Fill158 1,493-10 1 0-6 Feet Deep L.F. 4,208 7.50 31 560.00 3947 29,602.50 "- --- 3947 29 602.50 2 6=8 Feet Deep L.F. 2 070 8.90 2 436 12.780.40 --- --- 3 -1 666 9,157.50 -'- --- 41 666 91157.50 ---- a — -�. —��— _ 402 -6 733.50 ,. 7 r E i ► t i ! a ! i u r u r l t l a l i a a l a i r --- I ! I ! I ! I I r_!_I ! ! I I ! I ! I I,ja ljsjsjsTol;lai'ila (i aIT`•`!!a 1 a 11 1 a'iI ►JiaiiiilirhIsIill�altlili�lil � � l.Ila�rlilililllrlllr�rli0alalrlalilElrla!llrlrytlrn , NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -----.._..._.. .I 2 34 ._. _ 5 6 7 $ 9 10 !I 12 F - DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN ' THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - - T1E QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ' DRAWING. _--- - �nl)ias sz sz iz sz Sz VZ ez zziz- oz s"r et tl 91 sl 41 el- al if of —e s L 9 !! b E 2 allunlul+ c aalaaalrNa)nulNulxxlraalniaah�lg k, l, al�3i[ Ilas�y+I1++ prr� -- rte+ E *3 11tul1b3llrlltllt3slllaltlmnlnsaalasahiaairaa-6"1go ar laanl oa! laNla3laliB6lhin Elailaanll a!I MAR r ) 19 o ------------- Limb, - - - — �F .-c- 4' f CITY OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. WORK COMPLETED SHEET OF 7 SHEETS Area Street Improvements WORK PROPOSED PREVIOUS I THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS E 1.3 Trench Backfill co 't c can't. 5 12-IA Feet Dee 143 3,067.35 -- 6 14-16 Feet Dee 7 Catch Basin Laterals F _1.535 --- --_ d Foundation S ab' i -qn A 283 2,830-0 --- I ---601.40 1332 8,258.4 D" 97 LAIIQN IC-1.4 C 3`-5-2) _�304 2n &qns on 674 2,830.80 1471 517.40 821 3,448.20 s?_.(C-l42,412 1 2400 12,000.00 --- --- 2400 12 000.00 2.3 -I L 60 724 5,973.00 -'- -- 724 5,973.0 - Concretp Pi pe (C-JA r --- "-- 1825 15 512.50 2.5 21-inch Concrete Pi - 1707 19 801.20 --' 0719,801.20 2 I -Cancrett, Pipe fc-IE C1, 1866 25,097.70 42f; 16 486 8 237.70 --- 485 8 237.70 2.8 I _ - Class 3 L.F. 583 20.20 11 776.60 583 11 776.60 --- --- 583 11 776.60 2.9 i --6-inch Concrete Pie C-76 Class 3 L.F. 472 26.00 12 272.00 2.10 42-inch Concrete Pie C-76 Class 3 L.F. 288 31.554 086.40 --- --- i 65 2.11 Concrete Tees a 12" X 10" Each 1 76.00 76.00 1 76.00 --- --- 1 76.00 b) 12" X 12" Each 2 80.00 160.00 2 160.00 --- --- c 15" X 10" Each 1 130.00 130.00 2 260.00 d 15" X 12" Each 1 150.00 150.00 0 --- --- 260 on 152 --- --- PI -- �gtllll t!t 1fill!1 t1t 11t rjr 11s llt III 111 111 Ij1 t [ � I I I I ) >�j�>r°Im I°1°�}I°�°If��°�'I'i3ji�sl'lll�jllll�t�lor#lli(r1ti11t�111f111�1i�l�II�IIIIIItIIi6I111�I1111III111IIf1�IIsIrIrI17111t1 r NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED -_.. -_ .I. - Z 3 4 -- _ 5 6- 7 8 9 10 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - f THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. - - Q}£ 6Z BZ L2 9Z SZ frZ £Z ZZ f2 OZ 6r 81 Lt 91 SI frl £i ZI it Of 6 @ i119311111111iII11111111IIit1ltfH�llllln�lln�l ll�itt}C � ,"'�'•"111tTIkn�!"."�It"tllrJ'd '•�"'j�•lilt�l^1d �,,,` L..!..l. ' I ! 1...1, I L p I I 6 .!- I . J -_-- .l.�- !}.i°lUtLt1L11.' Iltllll�Cn7nlI1tII_I °En6 as°4°"3 IlllfllyrNlllt=t�j��II_III!lllllllnII1111IItIlllljjljj�jjj�p@ it 11 1V 0 -- . _ _ ^---'- j. ~ S.W. 72nd Ave. Area Street Improvements WORK COMPLETED SHEET�o� 7 WORK PROPOSED sHEEYs PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS REMARKS 2.11 (coni.) f 18" X 12" Each 1 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 1 170.00 --- --- 170.00 21" X 10" Each 1 190.00 190.00 ___ __ h 21" X 12" Each 3 200.00 600.00 2 1 190-on i 24" X 10" Each 5 215.00 1,075.00 --- 400-00 j 24" X 15" Each 1 290.00 290.00 1 290.00 --- -1 290-00 k 27" X 10" Each 1 275.00 275.00 1 275.00 --- I --- 1 275-00 1 30" X 10" Each 1 320.00 320.00 m 36" X 101, 390 On Each 1 400.00 400.00 2.12 96-inch CMP Com lete a) 14 ua a L.F. 30 ; 7 5 22 875.00 ! --- 305 22 875.OD b 16 ua e I 11 17; 57 On 0 1 -- 2.13 CMP Tees is 96" X 18" E h 2400.00 --- 6 96" X 24 --- 2 400.00 " 1 300.00 --- 1 300.00 Ic 95" X 36" 2 800.00 -" --- 2 800.00 2.14 96" X 90" CMP d 1 1 500.00 --- --- 2.15 96-inch CMP Bends 3 3,000.00 --- 3 3,000.00 3. MANHOLE CONSTRU ' 3.1 Flatto 48-inch Manhole 17 --800-00 13.Lnn-no 18.5 14,800.0-0 1 0.5 400.00 19 15 200.00 , 3.2 $ta - _ i -ion nn --- 3.3 e on CMP Fach an nn 7,r,-rfi no 74 6,660.00 --- 74 6,660.00 Ono3.4 Ma h 1 no 11000.00 --- --- 000 - ! a illi+�Igalsis�lisleis,rf1lail r11111,11m,Ill sislajTfITi T1111 ii_jls iTmq I- l t 3 5 _6 l 7NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED �p DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN 9 e l s 1e 1e e!l I s Is1�1s 1 l 1-a..i--r-1 s.i.a l s12►s }=amu.. ,�.,,.�.-.._.. �. THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL ? DRAWING. - OE 6Z 8Z LZ 9Z SZ bZ EZ ZZ IZ OZ 8t 81 11 9i SI t'I EI ZI ii OI S 4 t nit:nalasn�ualun�ssullNs�firrlms�;snli sseakrtssaae3rualirnisaNlarrduwleeul,a„1 L..i....r...i s..�Ir€ehsn�nwEwu�an:hna Eue ! ! i oNOW MARCM 1 !g Mm a - e �-�>S7LilI!!!'lllt�iiiilaAN�iiinnsllunLinl i!i 11191tfN�N1BIiJiiSiiilalill t_ �, w 4 ' CITY OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. WORK COMPLETED SHEET 6 TDF 7 SHEETS Area Street Improvements WORK PROPOSED PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITERA DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL I TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PRICE OOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS REMARKS 4. DITCH INLET Each 2 480.00 960.00 --- --- --- --- --- --- 5. CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE Each 2 500.00 1 000.00 --- 6. RAILROAD UNDERCROSSING (Sheet 15) L.S- All 2i 000.00 --- ___ 7. CONNECT EXISTING DRAINS, Complete Each All 21,000-00 9 400.00 3 600.00 24 9,600.00 2 800.00 26 10,400-00 8. PECIAL RIP RAP C.Y. 65 25.001 625.00 --- _ OTAL SCHEDULE II 394.715.30 I � t r I I Deductible Alternate _ 1. RAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION COMPLETE i 1.1 W. U er Boones Ferry Road — & S.W. Durham Road L.S. All 73 654.00 --- --- --- --- 1.2 S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Upper Boones Ferr y Road L.S. All 57 981.00 --- --- --- 1.3 W. 72nd Avenue & .W Upper rry Road (Carme� --- --- --- --- -- --- 4t;-q83.010 .. _..: – rie)1la�a;lllll aj1IIl, all apa�lll Ijr�3j9 ,il�lja Ijlh tfaTt ah911l, jlrlj7-Ilr�tja Ij, , , a!, , i I I IIa E 8 I t I 19 NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED _.___ __._.._ -I 2 3 4 _ 5J 6. 7 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO - THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. --- o -�a ez cz 9z sz �z ea z? 12 Oz sr ei- ti -is Si.--�, _eI_ zs -i 016 a L y .al�uulwnlaa,i,u,luulNaa�n,�laJ"11 �IHIt91Ei _ �Ii927�unln�lulll! a t,aali I��DIl 311IIUf� y�J , I , uIIIIIujn9 mAAL;" e CITY OF TIGARD LID 21 -- S.W. 72nd Ave. WORK COMPLETED SHEET 7 'OF_ 7 SHEETS Area Street Improvements WORK PROPOSED PREVIOUS THIS MONTH TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL - TOTAL TOTAL REMARKS PRICE DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS UNITS DOLLARS 2. FIRE PRF-FMPTTON SYSTEM. COMPIFTE 2.1 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road & S:W. Durham Road L.S. All $ 5,459.00 --- --- --- --- --- 2.2 S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road L.S. All 5,552.00 --- --- --- 2.3 S.W. 72nd Avenue & S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Road L.S. All 6 471.00 --- --- --- --- --- Change Order No.l (Signal Revisions I 215.00 --- --- 1 ................ TnTAI SCHEDULES 1, IT and TV I i i f i i $550,770.04 $31,940.87 $582,710.91 PREVIOUS PAYMENTS ESTIMATE NO. 6 PAYMENT PERIOD November, 1982 CONTRACTOR TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED 582,710.91 EST. NO. AMOUNT LESS RETAINAGE —L—% 29,135.55 86 492.18 APPROVED F PAYMENT DATE Columbia Excavating LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENT 523 231.54 2 120,914.91 P.O. Box 278 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTteAATE. 2�: 1 /� 84 Tualatin, Or. 97062 30 .� 3 53 655.31 lits Ht): PAYMENT DISTRIBUTION 4 155,030.07 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 729 07 ®eHAAS&ASSOCIATES,INC. PAYMENT c o••e CONSULTING ENGINEERS &SURVEYORS ..r Sune aJS.AGC Cent*. 1503)667.2e50 9450 s W Comme,c.C.'c ae,636.6195 ESTIMATE W1,on Me.O.egon 97070 80 'oi,lrl►,1, ,I, ,1, :,, ,1:,l, ,1, e e ,1, ,1, 11, Ij1 T , , . _ -- ---=—_- DRAWING is I I I LMED _.! I ' I -I 2 I E I I 3 I .- �T1TJ��Im) lip 5lTl��lll_11'_6°IOIII°,°I��I�'liiltr�l+fl!°,Illi°1�{°hI�II�°i�f°I1I�1°f°i',I°I°(°IeI°Itf°Iij°17f►a,I,i,f,o, c NOTE: IF LESS CLEARHIS li - B 8 O I1 12 :jdo THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - TFE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL - DRAWING. --- OE BZ 8Z LZ SZ SZ mZ EZ Z2 12 OZ 61 e! LI 91 S1 i,, e1 ZI ....'j pj—7j- s9 �- 9_.__ 5 ._ b -E Z !"`+a' E sn,Iunluu�uuln„luNh,,,Iuuhiul„pllyU�elr °�a�,,1„J, e•J > ��,I 1 1 f� A� j P I ..,�....,.. L... Ijl1 CTT i MOTMAIR” n 1j990J NINE 4 ,u r, rt bills- Wa moms in I rr U supiumo% drop�s L '&O� /Y By SHARON DeBUSK "There are fixed costs and variable Staff Reporter costs (for supplying water)," he said. Lake Oswego residents may be forced to "The variable costs such as power and pay higher water rates in the future if the chemicals would probably go down"since city of Tigard goes through with a plan to the city would be pumping less water. form its own water department and buy its "But fixed costs such as debt service on water from Portland instead of Lake bonds 8 staff the the treatmene. And t the �ftt of Oswego. The Tigard community is served main the same whether we provide one or primarily by the Tigard Water District,a 10 million gallons of water." separate governmental entity from the ci- Harvey said revenues frome ftp ty of Tigard.The district buys 80 to 100 per- district have helped pay s cent of its water supply from Lake Oswego costs in the past and a rate increase would and up to 18 percent from Portland. A make up for the loss of revenue. small amount is supplied by Tigard's The city of Tigard's plan has sparked a wells. squabble between the city officials and the But Tigard city officials, wary of Lake Tigard Water District,which formed near- Oswego's water supply and the water ly 25 years before the city was incor- district's ability to provide a long-term porated in 1961,and has serves thell as jBon1 r` water supply,may pull the city of Tigard ty of the Tigard community out of the district, and form a new water Mountain and King City. department that would get its supply from The city contends the district has not Portland — ending a decade of service planned for a long-range water supply. from Lake Oswego. District Adminstrator Bob Santee Tigard is Lake Oswego's major water disagrees. customer. The city receives about 50 per- Though no formal contract exists cent of Lake Oswego's excess water. between the district and Lake Oswego, City Finance Director Fred Matthias Santee is confident Lake Oswego will be says Lake Oswego stands to lose nearly able to supply the bulk of Tigard's water $500,000 of revenue — one-quarter of its and hopes to work out some kind of long- total water revenue — if the city of term contract with officials here soon. Tigard's plan is successful. In addition, the district has been "We need that money," Matthias said. negotiating with the city of Portland since "It has been an important source of last summer on a 125-yearose Lam of a revenue for us." back-up water supply, butLake Oswego City Manager Pete Harvey snawhen tthe he two of the s icntioodn�could not and Public Works Director John Godsey agree said the city would be forced to raise water The district currently is in the middle of rates to make up for the loss of revenue a 10-year contract with Portland, and dif- that would result if Tigard stopped buying ferences of opinion on the new contract water from Lake Oswego. prompted the water district to consider a "Selling them our surplus'water has lawsuit against Portland to clear up the helped our financial position. If we lose dispute. them as a purchaser it will definitely hurt The city of Tigard got involved when city our revenues,"Godsey said. officials discovered that the district hadn't Harvey said the average single-family signed a contract with Portland by the homeowner presently pays a minimum June deadline and recommended that the $5.75 monthly charge and about 36 cents city form a separate water district and per cubic square foot of water running sign its own contract with Portland for all through the meter. of Tigard's water supply. He said several factors—many of them Tigard City Manager Bob Jean explain- unknown at the present time — would continued on page A3 determine the amount of the increase. 9 a >.;� o as on as as a ra a as ci 0 y.y CDcu O c�,-t as =L, z � vro' �Ocuo �.- - - 9 . 008 cel 0 0 W "V-0 Uli:s p y U O 4 y,:7w CyC a'Ova va y O� y _"'Oa°C cO � �rw ) ° x T �'� ycc o 3 3 ti as o mg•oaa ' c �" d.�' .C...7' USS' � O0 O� a+�• O'�Vi$1' C4 p y .o �e ucBat, w =nu Sw O T as a. u� a oynn ,°a � a) Yiaco. on� ai�. o •'p � o •�w y cC �.b u v V iii a aims.-.ia }aO w. o " 3 a cc V3 cts cisv cyg 3 DC7 y�c ca 3 ,�„o 1 �.i as as oa w m ca ® C� wQ� m y T c6' y C C13= fl � cw 1ia 3 O y Ov c CU a: as Motu 7 W��•`49 m oy T3 a5i (n as c 4n B., s CIS CD oftifta Ta°a.'y' oF �'.? 3ami � c:oR �.. 3o yaas 'f..a• .2.= pmp`gaL. um o 3 v. as > O > c° oE-, UD(D S — 3Cwa�io �i "' moo cc CL ca p as on W CU as m as �i no . . «, Bu,- ao Oom O a x qme o as Q.053E van uriS Ova �� U3 0 cob .tom.+ 45 10 d 'OtaC yyyty�p�p�ii,� ��ffaa vi w O iO ��~ i� a=C+ •o C� T�� aoir C4 C Q.C''S''•-- � �sc0 Aft% to C c. m b vco w a 3'v o0y� ca va�g� � `+ m ami wa5 W u � a �- 170- eo oo WY OF TIGARD ws—GMNCarm.areca+ TO: Martha Bishop FROM: Doris Hartig Enclosed are copies of signed petitions for each of the candidates who ran for the position of Mayor and Council Position #3. Also enclosed is a copy of the Building Permit issued 8/1/80 to Charles Atherton for the construction of a storage building on his property. Doris 19 pages @ $.25 per page = $4.75 f 124MS.W.R{NN P.O.20X 2330 T*#".COEGON 9I73 P":&W171 i r i CITY OF TIGARD !` P.O.Box 23397 9020 S.W.Burnham POLICE DEPARTMENT Tigard,Oregon 97223 5 f L November 24, 1982 ) k f Mrs. Martha Bishop 10590 S.W. Cook Lane Tigard, Oregon 97223 a RE: Case #82-2620 Date: 10-31-82 Offense: Criminal Mischief (Election Signs) Dear Martha: Y In response to your note of November 19, 1982, regarding the above case. I had Sgt. Martin attempt to call you on Saturday, November 20, 1982; however, you were not in. Sgt. Martin talked to Wilbur regarding the status of the case, and I am sure that he related the information to you. This case is open; at this time we do not have any significant leads as to the identity of the perpetrators. If you should hear any additional information, please call. Also, be assured that criminal mischief or vandalism crimes are covered in our school programs. We can, however, use signs as an E example. Sgt. Martin is working this case, and if additional leads are de- veloped, he will advise. Sincerely, R.B. Adams Chief of Police RBA:ac cc: City Administrator E j .... t�_':S u .r�caw.., �. nr ,Jr2�i?4;e.,...�k.9li►' ... IL f. 1981-82 YEAR END _7�)cAd n C4- Cd 0-n� i� 17Qd s BALANCE OF CHECKING ACCOUNT AT YEAR-END 10-31-81-----------$5, 405. 67 1981-82 ACTIVITIES = INCOME------------------------$9 ,964.09 EXPENSE-----------------------10,200.62 1981-82 DEFICIT ------------------------ 236. 53 TOTAL CASH ON HAND AT YEAR-END, 10-31-82--------------------$5,169 . 14 e {OUR 1981-82 DEFICIT OF $236. 53 SHOULD BE COMPARED TO THE 1980-81 PROFIT OF $2,674.861 i s . r DINNER DANCE 1980-81 1981-82 INCOME------------------------$3,386 . 50 *2,155.00 EXPENSES : 1980-81 ITEMIZED: DOOR PRIZES---------$38.00 ENTERTAINMENT------ 475.00 HATS--------------- 35.96 DINNER {EAGLES} --2,023. 50 FLOWERS----------- 23.94 TICKET 'REFUND---- 72. 50 PRINTING TICKETS-- 23. 30 -------------- TOTAL : $2,692- 20 C 1981-82 ITEMIZED: DOOR PRIZE----------$80.00 ENTERTAINMENT 300.00 TABLE DECORATIONS 40.00 POSTERS 15. 57 PRINTING TICKETS 20. 30 e DINNER. TEAGLESI 1210.00 - COMPLIMENTARY DINNERS ------ 20.00 ---------------------------- TOTAL :-------------------------------------------$1,685. 87 TOTAL PROFIT: $694. 30 $469 . 13 TOUR FROFYT WAS $225. 17 LESS THAN THE PRECEDING YEAR} EEERAMLMAELMAWM��MAL CHICKEN BAR-B-Q 1980-81 1981-82 INCOME----------------------------$1,980. 37 $1,983- 61 DINNERS :$1,548. 40 4+AW CHICKEN: 435. 21 EXPENSES : 1980-81 ITEMIZED CHICKEN $761 . 16 PLATES 8 SALAD 135 .70 C BRIQUETTES 98. 70 FOIL 4 . 19 ------------ TOTAL : ------------------------$999 . 75 e 1981-82 ITEMIZED: _ UTENSILS, SUPPLIES, ETC : $218. 38 SALAD 275.00 "BRIQUETTES 97. 20 CHICKEN 739 . 50 MISC. EXPENSE 42.94 ------------ TOTAL :---------------------------------------------------1,373.02 TOTAL PROFIT $980.62 $610 - 59 {OUR PROFIT WAS $370.03 LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS YEAR} mss;. - �: . ��-�� _. •� ��--� .� r -=- - -�- -_;� ,1 z BEER GARDEN 1980-81 1981-82 INCOME------------------- -- $4,183. 70 $2, 793.00 EXPENSES = 1980-81 ITEMIZED BEER $959 . 50 OLCC LIC- 20.00 ENTERTAIN- 600.00 FENCING 220 .00 SECURITY 320.00 POPCORN 193. 85 TICKETS 3. 50 TOTAL------------------------$2,316. 85 1981-82 ITEMIZED PEANUTS $ 80. 70 • OLCC LIC- 40 .00 - ENTERTAIN - 825.00 FENCING 340 .00 SECURITY 142.00 BEER 967. 56 - TOTAL---------------------------------------------2,395. 26 TOTAL PROFIT $1,866. 85 $397. 74 TOUR PROFIT WAS $1,469. 11 LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS YEAR} r - .9<<_ yr.rp.,.... .. .,........ .. r-L- e. '..��- INCOME 1980-81 1981-82 DINNER DANCE $3386. 50 $2155. 00 DONATION FROM CITY/CHAMBER 540 . 00 475. 00 BOOTH RENTAL $ TROPHY SPONSORS 2093.00 1655.00 BAR-B-Q 1980 . 37 1983.61 RAFFLE 581.00 -0- BEER GARDEN 3643. 70 2793. 00 INTEREST INCOME - 182. 81 472. 48 DONATION/LAMB WESTON 100 . 00 HOT AIR BALLOON SPONSORS 200 . 00 T-SHIRT SALES 130 . 00 1 TOTAL : $12,507. 38 + 9964. 09 s {OUR INCOME WAS ;2,543. 29 LESS THAN THE PREVIOUS YEAR ZINN _ ».. y :6 _..-...__._»"y�'ia:g.-tQ'. .L•.- �'Y�,,.__.....GMM�a�"'P2:_.t. _ .._.3'.. w.-ePs_.... .. ... ._.._ �f.Y�` + - ITEMIZED LISTING OF EXPENSES r 1980-81 1981-82 DINNER DANCE = DOOR PRIZES 73.96 $ 80.00 ENTERTAINMENT 475.00 300. 00 DINNERS 2023. 50 1210 .00 FLOWERS AND/OR TABLE DECORATIONS 23.94 40 -00 TICKET REFUND 72- 50 -0- TICKET PRINTING 23. 30 20 . 30 POSTERS -0- 15 . 57 COMPLIMENTARY DINNERS -0- 20 -00 FESTIVAL = TROPHIES RIBBONS x . 557. 30 ENTERTAINMENT-BEER GARDEN 60000.00 825. 00 00 BEER PURCHASE 959 . 50 967. 56 OLCC LICENSE 20.00 40 .00 BAR-B-Q COSTS 999.75 1373.02 TRAILER RENTAL 74.00 80 .00 i. ROSARIAN BRUNCH 99 .00 -0- ELECTRICAL 126. 59 30 . 87 FENCING 220.00 340.00 SECURITY 320.00 142. 00 PARK ENTERTAINMENT 300.00 400 . 00 t MUNCHIES FOR BEER GARDEN 193- 85 80. 70 i PGE ELECTRICITY 288. 14 314. 87 t HOT AIR BALLOON IRAFFLE} -0- 400.00 F HORSE DRAWN WAGONS -0- 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS = . 200. 00 C INSURANCE _0_ PAPER GOODS , PRINTING, POSTAGE, ENVELOPES ,ETC- 364.90 322. 40 T-SHIRTS FOR COMMITTEE MEMBERS 52.90 25.05 ADVERTISING -0- 1391.01 GIFT CERTIFICATE FOR POSTER MAKING -0- 30. 00 T-SHIRTS - KUIK FUN RUN -0- 274.00 T:A. C. {PARKING} -0- 50 .00 COFFEE MAKER -0- 46 . 27 CORPORATE COMMISSIONER-BUSINESS FILING 5.00 5. 00 P. O. BOX RENTAL 28.00 20.00 ATTORNEY FEE 500.00 -0- DONATION-LOAVES 8 FISHES 24.99 -0- GROMETS ON BANNER-KEPLERS 35.00 -0- OLCC COPIES FOR. LEGAL HEARING 5.60 -0- LUMITE SIGN 20.00 -0- ; ) ERIC JOHANSON-SOUND SYSTEM 75.00 -0- TIGARD MUSIC/STOLEN P. A. 175.95 -0- TOTAL EXPENSES $9,832.52 $10 ,200.62 {WE SPENT $368.10 MORE IN 1981-82 YEAR THAN THE PREVIOUS YEAR} WASHINGTON COUNTY �1 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING— 150 N. FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS November 26, 1982 COUNTY COUNSEL VIRGINIA DAGG,Chairman ROOM 401 LYELL GARDNER,Vice Chairman 15031 648-8747 JIM FISHER BONNIE L. HAYS LUCILLE WARREN TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Pursuant to Section 104 of Chapter 10 of the Washington County Home Rule Charter, Washington County is required to notify every City Council within Washington County of its intent to amend the text of the County Zoning Code. Enclosed please find Washington County Ordinance Nos. 263, 264 and 265. These Ordinances were introduced for first reading at the Board's meeting of November 23 , 1982. Ordinance No. 263 adopts a Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban Area. It proposes to create "Community Plans" for the follow- ing areas: Cedar Hills/Cedar Mill; Bull Mountain; Tualatin/Sherwood (outside city limits) ; Aloha/Reedville/Cooper Mountain; Bethany; and West Union, It includes textual policies and land use designation maps. It repeals the existing Comprehensive Plan and Plan of Develop- ment. It proposes to make only minor changes in the 185th East-West Study Area; Metzger/Progress and Raleigh Hills/Garden Home Community Plans. Ordinance No. 264 adopts a new Community Development Code for the urban area. This is very similar to a zoning code. It implements the Comprehensive Plan. It may also apply new procedures to the existing Community Plans. It repeals most of the existing Develop- ment Ordinance. Ordinance No. 265 adopts the maps necessary to implement the above Ordinances. A second reading of the above ordinances will occur on November 30 at 10 :00 a.m. and a third reading and first public hearing will occur on December 7, 1982 at 1:00 p.m. Enclosed are the cover Ordinances. The exhibits which are adopted by reference, i.e. the Comprehensive Framework Plan, Community Plans , Development Code and maps are much too bulky to mail. Copies-- are available for your review at any time. For further information, please contact the Washington County Plan- ning Department at 640-3519 . Si , cerDs 1 DRO:lh Arn , en Enc: Assistant County Counsel • an equal opportunity employer December 1, 1982 CRYOFTIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Ms. Ruth Gonzalez Oregon Downtown Development Association Post Office Box 561 Albany, Oregon 97321 RE: Oregon Main Street Program Dear Mr. Gonzalez, The City of Tigard is presently in the early phases of a downtown revitalization effort. As is the case for small cities, we are finding it very difficult to get our efforts to take off due to limited resources and the economy in general. Recently the City combined the municipal Planning and Building Departments into the Department of Planning and Development and hired me to coordinate the ongoing functions and provide staff to the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency (TURA) and its Advisory Committee. This action on the part of the City was prompted by Tigard°s commit- ment to downtown revitalization and economic development in . general. I believe that the City is in a unique position in its downtown revitaliztion process which would make it a valuable participant in the Oregon "Main Stz ,et" Program. First, we are in the initial stages of renewal -end in need of technical assist- ance to- get our efforts on course. Second, the character _ of the downtown area has changed. Third, Tigard is part of the fastest growing part of Oregon and the downtown area is in close proximity to three major transportation routes, 99W, Highway 217 and I-5. Finally, the City has both TURA and the TURA Advisory Committee in place and functioning with an initial plan of direction charted. TURA is made up of the members of the City Council while the TURA Advisory Committee is made up .of represent- atives of the downtown .business .community, the Chamber of Commerce, and other interested parties. On behalf of the City of Tigard, I respectfully request an application .for participation in the Oregon Main Street Program. I look forward to receiving the application package in January 1983. Sincerely, zlliam A. Monahan Director of Planning and Developmen WAM:dmj 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 I ' Oregon Downtown Development Association November 23, 1982 COMPETITION FOR OREGON'S 5 MAIN STREET CITIES TO START MID-JANUARY 1983 What is the state of your downtown? Do vacancies , parking problems, general deterioration plague it? Does it project vitality and economic health to your visitors and pro5,pactive new investors? Due to the number of requests from Oregon communities for downtown redevelopment ideas and assistance, we are creating the Oregon 'Main Street' Program. The Main Street project is nationally acclaimed and is currently operating in 48 cities in 6 states. Unlike most downtown programs, this one has been specifically designed to address the Cspecial needs of small cities and towns. Currently National Main Street cities are strengthening their downtown business base by cutting the start-up business failure rate in half and spurring an 11 : 1 private to public dollar investment ratio, despite the present poor economy. The ODDA Board of Directors has been working closely with the National Main Street Center to design Oregon's program. We will select five cities in Oregon to be 'Main Street` cities. If all goes well, those cities fortunate enough to be selected from the statewide competition will receive one year of technical assistance for their downtown revitalization project . A number of cities have already contacted us expressing a high degree of interest in the program. As a statewide organization, we feel it is important that every community be given a fair chance to compete to be an Oregon Main Street City. Attached is a description of the program including a discussion of its value to you and the participation requirements for your community. Application packages for the competition are now being completed. The application will be distributed the first of January to cities or groups who have specifically requested it in writing. Please include in your request letter a brief indication of your community's interest in downtown revitalization and the groups involved. Your reply can be key to the Association' s receipt of funding for the Oregon Main Street Program, as well as, help us more accurately measure the level of statewide interest. Letters should reach ODDA by December 15, 1982. f Ruth Gonzalez President I'o�t (ltlu 1iO\ ;h I Alhai ,,, ) )ivgun 1)7 t2 1 rz OREGON MAIN STREET PROGRPM '> (5 Cir_y Competition) Program: Five model cities will be chosen based on a statewide competition to receive a full year of technical assistance in downtown revitalization from the National Main Street Center and the Oregon Downtown Development Association. This assistance will include at minimum -- training of your downtown manager, on-site downtown assessment and recommendations, assistance to your downtown association board of directors, and an interdisciplinary resource team of specialists tailored to each town' s needs. Special assistance will be provided in the areas of fund raising and business re- cruitment. These five cities will be the subject of substantial media coverage. toward the hiring of a downtown manager and Each city selected will receive $5,000 $3,000 toward an incentive grant fund for downtown projects. 000 population or definable commercial Eligibility: The downtowns of cities under 50, districts (40 years or older) of cities over 50,000 population are eligible to apply. Cities or downtown associations making application will need to be a member of ODDA. ubmit a written request for application Selection Criteria: Any interested city must s by December 15, 1982. The letter should include a brief indication licationuformsmmwillyoity's interest in downtown revitalization and the groups involved. App be distributed to those communities who have responded in writing. The five cities selected in June are likely to have demonstrated the following: (1) a strong, demonstrable commitment from both the public and private sectors including their intention to continue the project for three years. (2) that a full understanding that the project's ultimate success depends on the local people. (3) have or commitment for funding a full-time downtown manager and operating budget for one year. An option Training Workshop in downtown revitalization, designed particularly for cities interested in applying will be held in February or March. (Downtown committee members, staff, downtown leaders, chambers are encouraged to attend.) Applications Available: Mid-January Application Deadline: June 15, 1983 . Selection. of 5 Cities: July 1 , 1983 (Dates may be altered to accommodate necessary adjustments in this "first-time" program. Respondants will be notified of any changes.) — o�� rv�siseRv Salo no - u = _ u C _ R - cc V O _ v O C V E cci V O O ? > c " C O O .V p 1-0 Y L'�:26,ASA. .`. - l/-1— c .=O o — O i l CJ ._ J _ 1 y C J > .O 7 C C O > O O U C _. !✓ - O O O — _ _ O — O C l o M F V ^ >r W>_O C V E o� V ra N O - G d W g O p - - 1 .. >Y — _ N O y C y 0 O C Z v. O u. C O C U � u v o f W u 3. O '73 �, o „�, u u o 3 v u O p u •° o$ c�c ¢ o> V j i; c x r u Y .72 u c o p ❑ u ' < a d > = m > _— 1C - y3o o � �v � y = v = > o �- E s = - j:r o u _— m m _ N_5 O ate` 4to >N p < :4 oz Y CJ ? O< T L O 7 VO O o v ^ _ ..—O - O k V L O _ ^ - ._. ^ V C C ... T O C C V<T O v U L ^ - 2 1 E > u p m v v p o - w � c �; u c ._,.c v o= _ py.CdVL7 Y� CJ f" .>'-_� � p7 Cyd > rs 'v w-2 O ° N �=O E _ o ? > mcg o — > ^ _ _ _ ^c u rs A a 4 c a = m r✓ a v 0.2 o ' _o - u= = _ co Y O S c O _ mo Q, c 2v —� a > _o = c oou _ - C N M C Y Oo o = _- 3 s 00 P+ C. O vl O ry., H Pr GL' U � I z x cn a w w H Q z w z a) x x >+ f Cl. w z z c^ cn Ga r�i x ca H 7.1 E~-� H4 Lo `� 6 r w 6 r w w �-+ w z p � ¢ w ca Eno OG as " cnH .aa a = Qu EL. wa� 3 `� 9 w E- P. 04 P cu O x U3 cn O rte-+ -4 04cn 3 O H w x H 1 I I cn 3 ^ to x x C-) z U to t` W U cn Cn N N �r- -4 cn ac ca = �I O U CD P4F-4 F4 U .meq U p4 V •T U r�4 CO U a 4 P4p W $ U p 114 v O .•� O 71 a1 H H co 1, O �+ e IR `: ��I p 3 o d w E r� 0 r-- cn � v: ,mow � = PL4 _ En N N -4 t� s z V C') H O H x a) U i+ " 3 p co N p a6� p v� z z,-4 E-+�—+ Zr-t Pa �} w w G w x a xx a N a �. ca U .� p .�-74 .n..C) CD CD4-1 rl C�l cn li cn 0 ^ 0 O :3 � gU nU ^U —4 c rn �n �. '_' .a rn cy N 1 0 ~ p Cko-4 z av z a -1 a o d w p v w o P4 ,4 cn 3 cv r— cn 3 •• 0 u % •• 0 K n W Ic un 1 n rt4 iC-K Cn ,� p c�a p aa' a N ,7 a' N x o H H H U z z z G '+ 0 0 0 8 A. O U U U aJ .,.r La U CU r4 _ a s w P w awi v r_ 3 <O 3 0 3 A t� 0 0 0 F=+ W C4 t- A4 CYN P: O H w v1 ✓ U O � O O O 1 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON November 29, 1982 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 SUBJECT: COUNCIL WORKSHOP RETREAT, SUNDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1982 9:30 A.M. - 5:30 P.M. Honorable Persons: Plans are going ahead for the annual Council workshop. Helen Terry has agreed to act as the facilitator and will be contacting each of you prior to the workshop for any suggestions or comments you have. We are exploring several Tigard locations for the workshop. I will let you know by the Monday, December 6, 1982, meeting where the workshop will be held. Please take a few minutes to organize your thoughts and either give them to Helen when you meet, or to me at the December 6, 1982, Council. meeting. If you will review the Goals and Priorities list, strike through those which are substantially satisfied and add notes of those new items you wish to be sure and bring up. Two worksheets on Council process are also attached and should be returned to either Helen or me by the December 6, 1982, meeting. Through Helen's interviews and the worksheets, I hope we can get to the heart of the workshop right away. As always, thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this essential annual. event. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions or comment. Yours truly, CITY OF TIGARD Robert W. Jean, City Administrator RWJ : dkr CEnclosures 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.SOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 r on DEIIIIR, 9 198 I AND Ili(I COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRn•1-01t i.lBtcnRY 11 .5 Council and Advisory Board Relatiu�i ��•5 Annual Coal Review Workshop 14 .0 Space Needs Productivity Council and Board Relations Accountability i Management System 3.5 Growth Impact Budget Workshop Purchasing Cost Consciousness 4.0 Civic Center 3.0 Pride in Library Library Services Intragovernmental (Internal) Cable TV Communications Hours of Operation Goals, Woirk Programs and Merit System Policy Options and Analysis 2_5 Municipal Reference Library Service Levels Visibility Volunteerism 3.5 Pacific Highway 2.0 Social/Cultural/Arts Philosop':y of Government Newsletter PUBLIC SAFETY Change Press and Media Relations 4.5 Police Department Image Financial Analysis (Inion Contract I Contracting Out Targeted Police Services 3.0 Intergovernmental Coordination Community Relations 4.0 Coordination with Law Enforcement Agencies Appropriate Technology Police Staffing and Growth Impact Comparison With Other Cities Dispatching I Tr.,Ap t 2.5 City Atm. ^ney. Tracy. Report. Versus Chief's Response Police -Department Space Needs }FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION Crime Prevention and Community Re3ation: Safety Valve 4.5 Labor Relations Municipal Judge Classification -and Compensation 3.5 public Safety Resource Policy I Organization School District Coordination ' Police Reporting 4 .0 Overtime Expanding Role of Police Department Alarm Response Fees acid Charges Taxes Equipment Replacement Policy Purchasing Policy Alternatives i Computers and EDP Technology Personnel System Report Writing Labor Negotiators . , Municipal Court Municipal Court Versus District Court 3.5 Vacation Policy ` Citings Total Compensation Policy I Finances 3.0 Fire Districts Coordination Capital Improvement Plan Light Bars Contingency Reserve 3.0 Debt Management 2.5 Tri-Met Coordination Computers and EDP TechnoloogY Code 2.0 Evaluate Feasibility/Desirability of: Ird l=ire Department Dun:;I t.)' ( Coull>rcll n:;i v(• I'l t+n VcI ::u:: t4 i'O 11 .0 I)(j,Ilt0wfl Ilcvital i.v.zo,i.on Street/Arterial :iy:;tern Sewer System Park Plan Parks Industrial Development Code Enforcement Growth Management Coordination Community Involvement Fleet Management 3.5 Planning Director Street Lighting Traffic Signs and Signals Pedestrian Ways/Bikeways Public Facilities Planning within Urban Growth Bounds Cable Communications/Cable TV Local Improvement Districts (LID's) Sign Code Economic Development Building.Department Street Light Outages and Traffic Light Malfunctions Capital Improvement Plan and Program Beautification 3.0 Recreation Public Safety Coordination Evaluate Feasibility/Desi.rabilj.:-,' of Three Water Districts in Tigard's UCB Becoming City Department Building Height Limits Chamber of Commerce Senior Center Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Engineering Cook Park Planning Commission Minutes Main Street Parking Added by the Park Board only: Greenway Development and Acquisition Park Development and Acquisition 2.5 Janitorial Services zmSTRUCTIONS: Please rate EACH -TOPIC by selecting how otten eacn event occurs (_left hand column) and then rate theimpact that frequency has on the city/council/community (right hand column) FREQUENCY iyirACT How often this event The overall impact this has on occurs is: the city is that it: Now & Decreases Has No IncreaseS Rare Then Common Effectiveness Effect EffectiveneSS 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 A. We come to the meetings 1 2 3 4 5 well prepared l 2 3 4 5 B. The mayor keeps us moving 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 C. Everyone has opportunity 1 2 3 4 5 to participate 1 2 3 4 5 D. Councilors fully participate 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 E. Conflict is brought out 1 2 . 3 4 5 into the open 1 2 3 4 5 F. I feel free to say what I 1 2 3 4 5 think during our meetings 1 2 3 4 5 G. Vie vote issue by issue (not 1 2 3 4 5 ( necessarily in blocks or coalitions) _ 1 2 3 4 5 H. We speak to one another with 1 2 3 4 5 the highest levels of courtesy (not labeling or name-calling) 1 2 3 4 5 I . The -agenda is prepared ahead 1 2 3 4 5 of time ' 1 2 3 4 5 J. The community feels listened 1 2 3 . 4 5 to during our meetings 1 2 3 4 5 K. We have a feeling of 1 2 3 4 5 accomplishment after meetings 1 2 3 4 5 L. Our physical arrangement at i 2 3 4 5 meetings helps us get work done 1 2 3 4 5 M. The council talks through its i 2 3 4 5 differences 1 2 3 4 5 . U. Vie have clear goals and 1 2 3 4 5 priorities 1 2 3 4 5 0. Our operating ground rules 1 2 3 4 5 are clear l 2 3 4 5 P. We are clear about what we 1 2 3 4 expect of the mayor 1 2 3 4 5 Q. We are clear about what we 1 2 3 4 5 expect of the city manacrer COUNCII. PROCESS + Address An;one A, Address Chair 1 2 3 4 5 B. We Know City Policies , , I Don' t Know City Policies 1 2 3 4 5 + Procrastinate, Delay C_ Decisive-Decision Making 1 2 3 4 5 Decision Making + Disrespect Spea'�ers (Wonder D_ Respect Speakers (Stay 2 3 4 5 Around, Don' t Listen) I Place, Listen) c MEETING PROCESS + Wander E_ On Topic 1 2 3 4 5 Many Side Discussions F. Few Side Discussions 1 2 3 4 5 + + ' People Do Not Say When G. People Say They 1 2 3 4 5 Lacking `CJnderstanding Don' t Understand ' Tend To Attack Idea II. Tend To Attack Person 1 2 3 [a 5 + One J-: Two Own —ends I. Group "Owns" Agenda 1 2 3 4 5 + + Doesn' t [fork As A Team ?' Works As A Team 2 3 4 1 Ward-provincial Interests ;. T_,K. Citywide 1 2 3 �� 5