City Council Packet - 08/23/1982 RM AM
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
AUGUST 23, 1982, 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LECTURE ROOM
1. REGULAR MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call to Staff, Council, and Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open
Agenda.
2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request
that an item be removed for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
2.1 Approve Minutes - July 26, 1982 and August 2, 1982
2.2 Approve Expenditures and Investments: $ 638,853.10
2.3 Receive and File Bowman/92nd Avenue Report
2.4 Receive and File Fall Street Improvements Report
2.5 Approve Resolution No. 82-9q Accepting Final Public Improvements in
Genesis I Subdivision.
2.6 Approve Resolution - No. 82-13,5—Request to Acquire Jurisdiction on
Certain County Roads.
2.7 Receive and File Memo on Park Reservation Policy
2.8 Receive and File Annexation Status Report
3. SOLID WASTE REPORTS
• Metro Transfer Station Report
• Solid Waste Rate Increases Report & Resolution No. 82-
Administrative Assistant Sargent
c
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING
r
4. STREET VACATION HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/PAC TRUST
• Public Hearing Opened
• Summation by Public Works Director
• Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Public Works Director
• Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council
• Ordinance No. 82- Vacating 72nd Avenue/Pac Trust Area
5. STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/BINGHA14
• Public Hearing Opened
• Summation by Public Works Director
• Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Public Works Director
• Public Hearing Closed
® Consideration by Council
0 Ordinance No. 82- Vacating 72nd Avenue/Bingham Area
6. STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/TOWER
• Public Hearing Opened
• Summation by Public Works Director
• Public Testimony - Proponents, opponents, Cross Examination
e Recommendation by Public Works Director
• Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council
:TREET
Ordinance No. 82- Vacating 72nd Avenue/Tower Area
7. VACATION PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/PACIFIC WESTERN
• Public Hearing Opened
• Summation by Public Works Director
• Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Public Works Director
o Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council
• Ordinance No. 82- Vacating 72nd Avenue/Pacific Western
8. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZOA 4-82
A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.44, M-4 Industrial
Park Zone of the Tigard Municipal Code adopted on June 21, 1982, to
include Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services as permitted use
type.
• Public Hearing Opened
o Summation by Planning Director
e Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
s Recommendation by Planning Director
e Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council y
• Ordinance No. 82- Adopting Amendment
9. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZOA 5-82
A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.84 of the Tigard
Municipal Code to allow specific provisions relating to Comprehensive Plan
Revisions.
® Public Hearing Opened
o Summation by Planning Director
o Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
e Recommendation by Planning Director
• Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council
e Ordinance No. 82- Adopting Amendment
i
10. MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY STREET LID #37
10.1 DISTRICT FORMATION HEARING
The Tigard City Council will accept public testimony regarding the
formation of an LID district in the area of Pacific Highway and the south `
end of SW Main Street.
e Public Hearing Opened
3
e Summation by Public Works Director
s Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Public Works Director
e Public Hearing Closed
C o Consideration by Council
e Ordinance No. 82- Forming LID #37 District j
l
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 23, 1982
's
10.2 AWARD BID
o Recommendation of Director of Public Works k
t 10.3 ASSESSMENT HEARINGs
will accept public testimony from all property
The Tigard City Council s
owners within the LID boundaries regarding the method of distribution of
assessments.
o Public Hearing Opened
e Summation by Public Works Director
s Public Testimony - Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Public Works Director
o Public Hearing Closed
o Consideration by Council
o Ordinance No. 82- Levying Assessments
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING CONCLUDED
13. RESOLUTION NO. 82-89 CHARTER ELECTION ISSUES - 11/02/82 ELECTION DATE
o City Administrator
E
14. PARK RULES REPORT AND ORDINANCE NO. 82- AMENDING PARK USE RULES
o Planning Director
15. COOPER ANNEXATION RESOLUTION NO. 82--
Planning Director
F
16. BENNY LARSON ANNEXATION RESOLUTION No. 82- }
j ® Planning Director iA
l i
17. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES REVISION PROPOSAL {t
A Planning Director i
18. FEES AND CHARGES ORDINANCE NO. 82-
Administrative Assistant Martin
19. FINANCIAL PLAN AND PROJECTIONS
o
5-Year Revenue and Expenditure Projections
® 1 1/2% Limit Impact
a Departmental Priorities
20. 72ND AVENUE, STREET LID #21 PROGRESS REPORT
• Director of Public Works
21. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair
under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged
to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting.
22. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into executive session
under ORS 192.660 (1)(f), (1)(e) and (1)(d) to discuss issues relating to
pending litigation, acquisition of real property, and labor negotiations.
t 23. ADJOURNMENT
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 23, 1982
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
t
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian, John Cook,
Kenneth Scheckla (arriving at 7:35 P.M.); Director of Public
Works, Frank Currie; Finance Director/City Recorder, Doris
Hartig; City Administrator, Bob Jean; Planning Director,
William Monahan; Legal Counsel, Tim Ramis; Office Manager,
Loreen Wilson.
CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL, AND AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER UNDER OPEN
AGENDA.
(a) City Administrator requested the following items be placed on the
Open Agenda.
.1 Resolution For County Road Acquisition
.2 Refund Request
.3 Special Meeting Request for August 30, 1982
COUNCILOR SCHECKLA ARRIVED: 7:35 P.M.
(b) Mr. Aldie Howard requested an opportunity to speak with Council under
open agenda.
Mayor Bishop stated this would .4 on the open agenda section.
3. APPROVE MINUTES - July 26, 1982 and August 2, 1982
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
4. APPROVE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $.638,853.10
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
5. RECEIVE AND FILE FALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS REPORT
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive and
file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 82-94 RESOLUTION OF THE TIG_ARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING
THE FINAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
GENESIS I SUBDIVISION.
Ic (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
7. RECEIVE AND FILE MEMO ON PARK RESERVATION POLICY
` Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive and
(a) Motion by
file report.
us vote of Council present.
Approved by unanimo
$. RECEIVE AND FILE ANNEXATION STATUS REPORT
Councilor Cook to receive and
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by
file report.
's
us vote of Council present.
Approved by unanimo
tl
9. RECEIVE AND FILE BOWMAN/92ND AVENUE REPOST
16135 SW 92nd Avenue, expressed concern regarding
fa) Tim Lewis, the Cit to make
right-of-way easement of 5 feet which is required by Y
the sidewalk improvements along his street. He stated that the
developer of the property should have given this dedication before he
sold the land and Mr. Lewis noted that he should not be penalised now
for something the developer failed to do three years ago.
(b) Director of Public Works said that Mr. Lewis was advised in
the
beginning that only the public right-of-way portions of the project
d that the other private improvements
were done by the developer an
should be completed now along
with the sidewalks.
(c)
Mr. Lewis stated that the subdivision was originally approved when it
and that
Tigard
was in Washington County Furtherdiscussion ensued regarding the
subdivision in 1979. and/or the property owner
sidewalk issue and what action
the City
could take to remedy the problem.
(d) Councilor Scheckla requested this issue be discussed further at the
August 30, 1982 meeting. Consensus of Council was to discuss on that
F
date.
10. SOLID WASTE REPORTS
Administrative Assistant Sargent gave background information
(a) the garbage haulers stating
regarding the proposed rate increase by
what the increased costs would be.
Mr. Carl Miller, Miller Sanitary Service; Herb Frank, Frank's
(b) and Mr. Schmidt, Schmidt's Sanitary Service,
Disposal Service; supported the increase in rates for
appeared before the Council and
the City by noting the increase in costs for disposal and union fees.
(c) Administrative Assistant Sargent recommended Council approve
Ordinance to adopt the fee revision to be effective on October 1,
1982.
PAGE 2 - GOUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
ear eso� s
(d) ORDINANCE NO. 82-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIG_ARD CITY COUNCIL
INCREASING GARBAGE RATES.
(e) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
(f) Administrative Assistant Sargent advised Council that the Washington
County Transfer Study Committee will be meeting with Metro to develop
criteria for selection of sites for transfer stations. By
mid-February recommendation should be received for sites.
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING
11. STREET VACATION HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/PAC TRUST
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Director of Public Works summarized the need for the public hearing
and stated that Pac Trust needs to vacate some right-of-way for the
72nd Avenue LID project.
(c) Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval with the revised page
two of the ordinance being adopted. The revision was distributed by
staff and corrected a typographical error.
C (e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-55 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF SW 72ND
AVENUE/PAC TRUST, A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE
CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON.
(g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
12. STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/BINGHAM
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Director of Public Works explained where the site was located and
that this was necessary to further the 72nd Avenue LID process. He
did state that the State of Oregon still needs to give back to the
City a portion of this property, and therefore recommended the public
hearing be continued to September 27, 1982 to allow the time the
State needed to respond.
(c) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to continue
the public hearing to September 27, 1982.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
i
PAGE 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 23, 1982
I I III III Will
13. STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/TOWER
(a) Public Hearing Opened
Director of Public Works stated that area was no longer in the public
(b) for the 72nd Avenue
right-of-way and advised that this is necessary
LID.
(c) Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval and recommended Section
7 of the ordinance be amended to read as follows:
and after the 30th day after
"This ordinance shall be effective on i
the City Council, and approval by the Mayor, or {
its enactment by under the control of Forest
until such time as other rig ht-oay ment of the 72nd Avenue project,
Tower, and necessary for the improve
is dedicated to the City of Tigard at no cost to the City."
e) ORDINANCE NO- 82-56 AN ORDINANCE VACATINGCPUBLIC OT RIGHT RIOF GHT-OF-WAY 72ND
( AVENUE/TOWER AREA,
THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON.
econded by
Councilor Schec:la to adopt.
(f) Motion by Councilor Brian, s }
S
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
i
HEARING - 72ND AVENUE/PACIFIC WESTERN
14. STREET VACATION PUBLIC
I
(a) Public Hearing Opened �
(b) Director of Public Works stated this was in the area of the 'S' curve
on 72nd Avenue. The City had acquired more
and give back toand than was the property ownersary
in the area and need to v
(c) Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
ON OF sW
(f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-57AN PA�FICCE VWESTERN,ACATING AA PUBLOIC RIGHT-OF-WAAVENUE/ Y
IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY,
OREGON.
(g) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
Mx
t 15. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZOA 4-82
A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.44, M-4 Industrial
Park Zone of the Tigard Municipal Code adopted on June 21, 1982, to
include Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services as permitted use
type.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Planning Director gave history report on request and stated that the
code, as adopted on June 21st, inadvertently left out the financial,
insurance and real estate services from the listing of permitted use
types in the M-4 zone.
(c) Public Testimony:
JB Bishop supported the proposal.
(d) Planning Director recommended approval.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-58 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.48.010, LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL ZONE, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE,
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(g) Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
16. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZOA 5-82
A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.84 of the Tigard
Municipal Code to allow specific provisions relating to Comprehensive Plan
Revisions.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Planning Director stated that this request was to revise the time to
submit CPR's for action. This would allow the City to formulate the
Comp Plan. The suggested months for CPR submission were April and
October.
City Administrator reported that the Planning Commission placed a
sunset clause in Section 2 for January 1, 1984 and requested review
of the issue over the next few months.
(c) Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak.
(d) Planning Director recommended approval.
(e) Councilor Brian expressed some concern because citizens could only
apply twice a year and this could hold up real estate sales an
unreasonable time and perhaps create a financial hardship on theD:.
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
City Administrator stated that the Planning Commission added to
section 1 of the ordinance a clause that would allow Planning
Commission or the City Council to initiate a petition. This would
allow for Council to hear hardship cases on an individual basis
between application periods.
%f) Public Hearing Closed
(g) ORDINANCE NO. 82-59 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.84.030,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, OF THE TIGARD
MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(h) Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
17. MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY STREET LID 437 - DISTRICT FORMATION HEARING
The Tigard City Council will accept public testimony regarding the
formation of an LID district in the area of Pacific Highway and the south
end of SW Main Street.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Director of Public Works stated this improvement would be a great
benefit for traffic flow on the southerly end of Main Street. He
continued by describing the improvements to be made.
(c) Public Testimony:
JB Bishop, Developer, requested Council approval of LID.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-60 AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND &ATIFYING THE
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 2,
1982, WITH RESPECT TO MAIN STREET/PACIFIC
HIGHWAY STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID
#37); APPROVING, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF STREET IMPROVEMENT; DECLARING RESULTS OF
HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; PROVIDING
FOR THE MAKING OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(g) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
18. MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY STREET LID #37 - AWARD BID
(a) Director of Public Works reported the following bids were received on
this date for the LID #37 improvements.
PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
BIDDER'S NAME ADDRESS BID AMOUNT
Cascade Const. PO Box 4267, Portland, $98,308.00
Baker Nock Co. 21880 SW Farmington Rd, Beaverton $76,085.00
Engineer's Estimate [$68,515.00]
(b) Director of Public Works recommended Council delete two items from
the bid as follows:
# 8. Imported Topsoil. Bid was too high, will advise bidders
where to obtain topsoil at less cost.
#18. Building Demolition. Bid again too high, will sublet
this item to another bidder.
(c) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to
tentatively award the bid to Baker Rock Co. with items #8 and 918
being deleted for a total bid award amount of $62,850; subject to the
Mayor's ratification after the executive session scheduled for later
in this meeting.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
19. MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY STREET LID 437 - ASSESSMENT HEARING
The Tigard City Council will accept public testimony from all property
owners within the LID boundaries regarding the method of distribution of
assessments.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Director of Public Works stated that the method of assessment was a
50/50 split of the costs since the project was being done not only
for the development but for the City as well.
(c) Public Testimony:
JB Bishop, Developer, questioned whether the demolition of the
building should be taken out of the LID. He stated that he had
donated the land to the City and felt it unfair to not be able to
assess the tear down costs of the building.
City Administrator and Director of Public Works stated that
dedications accepted by the City should be unencumbered when the City
taken over jurisdiction, therefore the cost of the demolition should
be borne by the developer.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval of the assessment in
the amount of $68,750 which would not include the tear down costs of
the building.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) Councilor Cook requested that both JB Bishop and the City of Tigard
pay $1,250 for the demolition of the house in the LID assessment
which would make the total assessable cost $71,000 for the developer.
PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
r (g) ORDINANCE NO. 82-61 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE COST OF STREET
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE MAIN STREET!PACIFIC
HIGHWAY LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID #37) ,
RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTIONMENT AND
PRE-ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE
PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING
THE ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF
ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
(h) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to adopt
showing the total assessable cost to the developer as $71,000.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING CONCLUDED
20. RESOLUTION NO. 82-89 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND REFERRING CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF TIGARD TO THE
QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD FOR THEIR
APPROVAL OR REJECTION AT THE NOVEMBER 2, 1982
GENERAL ELECTION; CALLING THAT ELECTION; AND
DIRECTING THE CITY RECORDER TO DO ALL ACTS
NECESSARY AND CONVENIENT TO CARRY OUT SUCH ELECTION.
(a) Councilor Brian questioned measure no. 53 asking what would happen if
a Councilor filled an unexpired term. After lengthy discussion,
Legal Counsel suggested the following verbage be added in paragraph 1
of Section 7 as follows - addition set out with double parenthesis:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL. The elective officers of the city shall be
a mayor and four [councilmen] councilors who together shall
constitute the City Council. Except for Mayor and Councilors
holding office on the effective date of the 1982 Charter
Amendment, neither the mayor nor any councilor shall serve the
city in such position for a period of eight consecutive years,
((except for the filling of an unexpired term, and)) except
t at any councilor may serve as mayor not wit Stan ing eight
years served as councilor. The mayor shall be elected at each
general election and holdoffice for a period of two years.
[There shall be elected in conjunction with the state-wide
election in November, 1972, a candidate to the office of mayor
whose term shall begin on January 1, 1973.]
(b) City Administrator recommended against sending this issue to the
voters since there is confusion even on Council as to the
ramifications of the wordage.
(c) City Recorder recommended adding to Exhibit "B" precinct no. 180
noting the polling place would be at the Summerfield Club House -
f( East Entrance, 10650 SW Summerfield Drive.
(d) Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
as amended.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
7
21. PARK RULES REPORT
(a) Planning Director recommended Council adopt an ordinance ratifying
the Park Board recommendations for revisions in Park Rules for the
City.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 82-62 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.52, PUBLIC
PROPERTY USE, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE,
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(c) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
i
22. YOHN MOBILE HOME/COOK PARK
(a) City Administrator reported that the Park Board considered purchasing
the mobile home, however recommended to the City Council not to
purchase at this time. The Park Board also recommended that the City
should have a caretaker on the premises and should continue to
require they provide their own residence. City Administrator
recommended that City Council authorize staff to begin to find
another caretaker, request Mr. & Mrs. Yohn to move their mobile home
i
sxortly, and have staff draw up a contract for the new caretaker.
t
(b) Consensus of Council was to authorize staff to follow recommendation
of City Administrator.
23. RESOLUTION NO. 82-97 A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
TIGARD OR THE TERRITORY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHED. (Cooper)
t
4
1
(a) Planning Director recommended forwarding to Boundary Commission and
noted that area is a small island area but has had a triple majority
requesting annexation. t
t
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved b unanimous vote of Council present.
PP y
24. RESOLUTION NO. 82-98 A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
TIGARD OR THE TERRITORY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHED. (Benny Larson)
(a) Planning Director recommended forwarding to Boundary Commission and
noted that area is not an island area and has had a triple majority
requesting annexation. Area is 1.49 acres on 126th Avenue and Bull
Mountain Road. Mr. Larson, at this time, has not submitted plans for F
any development of property. E
f (b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
25. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES REVISION PROPOSAL
(a) Planning Director stated the proposed revisions to Section 18.84 of
the TMC were submitted for Council review before going to the
Planning Commission for a hearing.
(b) After discussing the changes suggested in Planning Director's memo,
consensus of Council was to authorize hearing by Planning Commission
on September 7, 1982.
26. FEES AND CHARGES ORDINANCE
(a) City Administrator recommended item be set over to September 13, 1982.
(b) Consensus of Council was to set over to 9-13-82.
27. FINANCIAL PLAN AND PROJECTIONS
(a) City Administrator recommended item be set over to September 13, 1982.
(b) Consensus of Council was to set over to 9-13-82.
28. 72ND AVENUE, STREET LID #21 PROGRESS REPORT
(a) Director of Public Works requested this item be removed from the
agenda. He stated progress reports would be filed with Council at
future meetings.
(b) Consensus of Council was to remove item from agenda.
29. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair
under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged
to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting.
29.1 RESOLUTION No. 82-95 - ACQUIRING JURISDICTION OF COUNTY ROADS
(a) Director of Public Works listed all of the streets under
consideration that were totally in the City limits and could be
turned over by the County. He stated the County was willing to
relinquish jurisdiction at this time.
(b) Lengthy discussion followed with consensus of Council being that the
issue should be brought up after the November 2nd election when the
results of ballot measure #3 would be known.
29.2 AUTHORIZE REFUND CHECK
(a) Finance Director requested Council authorize a refund check in the
amount of $3,700 to the Oregon Bank. This was deposited with the
City for the bond sale # 15 bid warranty.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to authorize
refund in the amount of $3,700.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
PAGE 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
29.3 AUGUST 30TH COUNCIL MEETING
i
(a) City Administrator requested Council call a special meeting on August
30th to consider LID business issues, Bowman Litigation, Annexation
issues and other business.
(b) Consensus of Council was to call special meeting.
29.4 MR. ALDIE HOWARD REQUESTED TO SPEAK TO COUNCIL
(a) Mr. Aldie Howard, candidate for a write-in campaign for the Mayor's
race in November, gave synopsis of his candidacy and asked if Council
would appoint him as Mayor, as the Charter sets forth, if he were
successful in his campaign.
(b) After lengthy discussion, consensus of Council was that they would
consider appointing Mr. Howard, but would not decide that issue now.
RECESS: 10:08 P.M.
RECONVENE: 10:25 P.M. Council reconvened at City Hall, 12755 SW Ash Avenue.
30. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into executive session
under ORS 192.660 (1)(f), (1)(e) and (1)(d) to discuss issues relating to
pending litigation, acquisition of real property, and labor negotiations.
RECONVENE: 11:58 P.M. Council went into regular session again.
31. 72ND AVENUE LID
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to direct
engineer to begin tentative revisions to form an alternative district
and subject to further City Council direction.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to authorize
staff and engineer to carry forward with right-of-way and easement
aquisitions.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
32. MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY LID #37
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to authorize
staff to proceed with project.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
33. ADJOURNMENT: 12:04 A.M.
City Recorder - City of Tigar
• ATTEST:
Mayor - City of Tigard
PAGE 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 23, 1982
Date August 23, 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City
Council on the following item:
(Please print your name)
1.3 Call to Staff, Council, and Audience for Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda.
Name, Address & Affiliation Items. Description
009--
s
f a
August 23, 1982
+ I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following items (Please print your name)
Item Description:
10. MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY STREET LID #37 .
'roponent (for) Opponent (against)
Mme, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
{
August 23, 1982
F IC wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
item Description: 10.1 DISTRICT FORMATION HEARING
roponent (for) Opponent (against)
acne, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
o
t
4 _ '
t:
E'
t
'4
E
i
t
INN
• {
i ]C wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on August 23, 1982 .
the following item: (Please print your name) _ G
Item Description: 10.3 ASSESSMENT HEARING
k
roponent (Eor) f Opponent (agains t)
E
ime, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and AffiIiatiozs
4
i
t
i
E
i
i
E
E
t
Date August 23, 1982
/ I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
�t the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: 4. STREET VACATION HEARING -
72ND AVENUE/PAC TRUST
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
( i
1
i 41
r
Date August 23 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: 5. STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING -
72ND AVENUE/BINGHAM
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
. Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
i
t
r
1
i
l
Date August 23. 1932
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: 6. STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING -
72ND AVENUE/TOWER
P-•:oponent (for) Opponent (against)
i -".-4ame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
d
i
1
-
Date August 23, 1982'
`. I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: 7_ STREET VACATION PUBLIC HEARING -
72ND AVENUE/PACIFIC WESTERN
roponent (for) k i Opponent (against)
arae, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation �� :::-_:F=,•' _._
• Kms_ :r:���� - _ .
�1
i
X11
�k
i
t(}
fy
i(5
f
F
Date August 23, 1982
t• I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description:
8. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZOA 4-82
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
Date August 23, 1982
( I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description:
20NE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZOA 5-82 _
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
li
s
E
S
ti
i
t�pF{
- i
Ft
r
{
i
1
{
i
f
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
JULY 31, 1982
PROGRAM BUDGET
Community Services
Police 14,105.89
Finance & Records 4,078.98
Municipal Court 4,334.16
i
Library 3,627.31
Social Services 334.76
Total Community Services 26,481.10
Community Development
r
Public Works 89,177.54
'r
Planning & Development 3,499.38
Total Community Development 92,676.92
Policy & Administration
E
s
Mayor & Council 978.62
Administration 1 ,929.56
Total Policy & Administration 2,908.18
City Wide Support Functions '•
s
Non-departmental 43,648.60 i
E
Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 96.023..72
Investments 100,000.00
s
DEBT SERVICE
General Obligation Bond
Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses 277,114.58
i
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
E
Contract E
ALL OTHER EXPENDITURES
Civic Center Project
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 638,853.10
4
August 19, 1982
i
- i
MEMORANDUM s
E
f
TO: City Council
FROM: Public Works Director
SUBJECT: SW 92nd Avenue (LID No. 27)
Attached is a copy of the advertisement for the call to bid on SW 92nd Avenue
(LID No. 27). Bid opening will be on September 3, 1982.
`l
t
t
i
INVITATION FOR BIDS
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
S.W. 92ND AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
LID NO. 27
Sealed proposals for the construction of the 92nd Avenue Street Improvement
Project will be received by the City of Tigard, Oregon, until 3:00 P.M. PDT on
Monday, September 3, 1982. Proposals will be opened at the office of the Director
of Public Works, City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, Tigard, Oregon 97223, (telephone
639-4171) .
Specifications and contract documents may be examined at the City Hall, Tigard,
Oregon. Copies of the specifications and contract documents may be obtained at
the Tigard City Hall for a refundable fee of $25.00 for each set.
All proposals shall be accompanied by a bid bond in an amount equal to ten percent
(10%) of the total bid to be forefeited to the Owner in the event of failure to
contract within ten (10) days after acceptance of bid. A one hundred percent
(100%) corporate surety bond will be required to guarantee faithful performance
under any contract.
Proposals shall be made on forms contained in the specifications and contract
documents. Only proposals from prequalified bidders shall be opened and read.
No bid will be read or considered unless accompanied by a ten percent (10%) bid
bond.
No bid will be received or considered unless the bid contains a statement by the
bidder as a part of his bid that the provisions required by "ORS 279.350-taorkmen
on public works to be paid not less than prevailing rate of wage," shall be included
in this contract.
The work contemplated consists of approximately 400 lineal feet of 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk, curb, asphaltic concrete pavement and base, 8-feet in width,
including related grading, driveway apron and drainage improvements.
City of Tigard reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to postpone the
award of contract for forty-five (45) days, to waive informalities, and to accept
the proposal which is considred in the best interest of the City.
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON`
Doris Hartig
City Recorder
Published in the Daily Journal of Commerce
Published in the Tigard Times
A-1
r
August 18, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Director of Public Works
FROM: Superintendent Engineering Division
SUBJECT: 1982-83 Reconditioning of Existing Streets Program
1 . Budgeted Funds:
Roadways -
Contractual Services (City) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
City) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Repair and Maintenance (Wash. Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . • • - • " . . . . . . "
Bikeways -
Bikepath Levy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . . . . .
2. Anticipated Distribution:
Road Surfacing (A.C. & Seal ) . . . . . . . .
Estimated Cost
25% Contractual Services
75% Repair & Maintenance
Bikeways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimated Cost . . . . . . . .
21% Contractual Services
79% Bikepath Levy
Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . Estimated Cost . . . . . . . .
20% Contractual Services
80% Repair and Maintenance
Miscellaneous (Grading, Markings, etc. ) . . Estimated Cost . . . . . . . . .
54% Contractual Services
23% Repair & Maintenance
23% Bikepath Levy
TOTAL . . . . . . .
L
EXHIBIT "A"
RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS
(1982-83 SPRING OVERLAY PROGRAM)
PRIORITY LOCATION (M/L) FROM (M/L) TO APPROX. COST
1 SW Tigard Street SW Tiedeman Avenue SW 115th Avenue
2 SW 115th Avenue SW Tigard Avenue SW N. Dakota Street
3 SW Sattler Street SW Hall Blvd. SW 100th Avenue
4 SW 100th Avenue SW McDonald Street SW Sattler Street
5 SW Murdock Street SW 98th Avenue SW 103rd Avenue
6 SW 103rd Avenue SW Murdock Street SW View Terrace
7 SW 98th Avenue SW Sattler Street SW Murdock Street
8 SW O'Mara Street SW McDonald Street (EastEnd) SW
Edgewood reet
9 SW Katherine Street SW 116th Avenue SW 121st Avenue
10 SW 95th Avenue * SW N. Dakota Street SW Shady Lane
11 SW Fonner Street* SW Walnut Street 115th Avenue
i SW Darmel Court SW 96th Avenue Cul-de-sac
*NOTE: 95th Avenue and, also, Fonner Street Cor.y.ingent to annexation.
EXHIBIT "B"
RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS
(1982-83 SPRING OVERLAY PROGRAM)
NOTE AV. AV. AV.
PRIORITY STREET FROM TO EXHIBIT THICKNESS, LENGTH, WIDTH,
"F" INCHES FEET FEET
1 Tigard Tiedeman 115th
2 115th Tigard N. Dakota
3 Sattler Hall 100th
4 100th McDonald Sattler
5 Murdock 98th 103rd
6 103rd Murdock View Terrace
i
7 98th Sattler Murdock
8 O'Mara McDonald (E. End) Edgewood
9 Katherine 116th 121st
10 95th N. Dakota Shady Lane
11 Fonner* Walnut 115th
12 Darmel* 96th Cul-de-sac
*NOTE: 95th Avenue and, also, Fonner Street Contingent to annexation.
I
j
i
i
l
c
s.
EXHIBIT "C"
RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS
(1982-83 FALL SEAL PROGRAM)
PRIORITY LOCATION (M/L) FROM (M/L) TO APPROX. COST
1 SW Katherine St. SW 129th Ave. Cul -de-sac
2 SW 124th Ave. SW Walnut St. SW Katherine St.
3 SW 127th Ave. SW 128th Ave. SW Katherine St.
4 SW 128th Ave. SW Walnut St. SW 127th Ave.
5 SW Bell Ct. SW 127th St. Cul -de-sac
6 SW 126th Ave. SW Karen St. Cul -de-sac
7 SW Fairview Lane SW 115th Ave. SW Fairview Ct.
8 SW Fairview Ct. SW Fairview Lane Cul -de-sac
9 SW 116th Place SW Fairview Lane Cul -de-sac
10 Sod Manzinita Ct. SW 121st Ave. Cul -de-sac
11 SW Marie Ct. SW 128th Ave. Cul -de-sac
EXHIBIT "D"
RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS
(1982-83 FALL SEAL PROGRAM)
AV. AV.
PRIORITY STREET FROM TO LENGTH WIDTH.
FEET FEET
1 SW Katherine St. SW 129th Ave. Cul-de-sac
2 SW 124th Ave. SW Walnut St. SW Katherine St.
3 SW 127th Ave. SW 128th Ave. SW Katherine St.
4 SW 128th Ave. SW Walnut St. SW 127th Ave.
5 SW Bell Ct. SW 127th St. Cul-de-sac
6 SW 126th Ave. SW Karen St. Cul-de-sac
7 SW Fairview Lane SW 115th St. SW Fairview Ct.
8 SW Fairview Ct. SW Fairview Lane Cul-de-sac
9 SW 116th Place SW Fairview Lane Cul-de-sac
10 SW Manzinita Ct. SW 121st Ave. Cul -de-sac
11 SW Marie Ct. SW 128th Ave. Cul-de-sac
EXHIBIT "E"
COST DISTRIBUTION METHODOLGY
, ,mprovecd roadway
�— B a
_rte,
e,cIsi.ing road way
s
i
i
A - CONTRACTUAL SERVICE (overlay) FUNDS
i
B -REPAIR 8k MAINTENANCE FUNDS
C —BIKEPATH FUNDS
i
STKEET It4YROVEt�'cit1T C0K?U'C<."CION SHEET
LOCATION
FROM: TO
GRADING
EQUIPMENT HOURS RATE I COST COMMENTS
MATERIALS UNITS
I
i
I I
i
STORM DRAINAGE
-QUIPMENT HOURS RATE COST COMMENTS
MATERIALS UNITS
I
ASPHALT PAVING
LENGTH WIDTH FACTOR THICKNESS TONS UNIT COST I COMMENTS
COST i
I
TRAFFIC DEVICES
EQUIPKENT HOURS RATE I COST COMMENTS
MATERIALS ( UNITS
I
LJ
oNc\IA T .� �o .., ! E nloF�n y,��_7 aI
u'vn ST
ANS.N
` N NORTH DAKOTA ST l' S. NDRT DAX�4--- —ST 3 ✓`
GLACI LILY C1R • __;l__._Ti' 2"
`
i 5 W PFAFFLE ST
1 W SUMMER N R. � <
Ty, S ST- �P N < <
L (../ •^ S.W. TIGARC ST.
y4ERCREST DRIVE I�- 9C i S. •F GV
�v n
aFa OK[ W T al ! LN. r••`[. N N SW
> m LEWIS
W _. nl I ? SW iANGEL �m L I I
SW. NYTNER� I -11 ip` MEADOW A EL PL.
/ ST ar\\
NII \\\\`
3�1t OTNERIME ST. p3 a I' C Ar f K yK)ITNENIM ST.
2 f NARO CT.L TI! FRJ SW �t4
7 JLL v n n J N ES Q O r
CLYDESDZi ; -T'ai" l h0 S of
•Y LNUT ST.„ ��' ���°O°��� CT.•�P�CA 'P S
Jm0 SW-KAREN IIVh SW- ANN ST. yP _ h v f1 ±Ta
N (C^� ► ! a _ -__ SWC
3 r ST Sf
41
c !n�L.aTa N Sy Sw. ERROL ST.
MCT. o S O~r [� 'Tl M'Y w eL ti•Yfh
f ST- SW.
CARMEN ST SW' FONNER SPS` .W 3' 99 CJ 1!;
=wwracws SJt / i r
SW- ALBERTA ST. PL S N!�- /� LP,S, Cj
GRANT
►YES AO DERRY DEL - �NT -�
'T
AM
o frfy Y�' so o S W. 19 PP s L Ca
ZO 5 p. f a rli;; LN. 3 S E0. pP^ � C• l \
OMARA i \
A l
y l,.
av / S.W
!ISW EDGEWOOD ST. � I
FAWNAVEN a. ;
SW. ROS P • CtTAlJ/ 3i
V 5 W,L gr
3 �yh N LS taT / f V- NILLVIEW ST. /
Lr LN VIEWYO DEN 2qr _ O S.W.
91 f S.W. GAAROE PARK PL. CP S N—DONALCCT. ST` _t
- T nELRO
/ — CO ONY CHEEK CT �E
; CT
_ q CT SW
FA NNO
DU / I. onaFSA j ; S ; a
T .W.
D - - MOUHTAIMVIEW_ LANE
TJ =
O S< SW. ••V W R cc
1'K.OP L 1XL31•' SW '
! J u w A
_ NiDWOOD ST go a/ s�` VIEW TERRACE
S�Y P_V p ^S M'. INEZ ST. LW - ate^
CT S
¢� m, .W.
NE [
N ; E RO. cTrncrK Z ICL
_ w _ y I,
i
DUN
Sm
Trfa•�( LN. _ _ S.W. � - - J• U
O 3 ;
PEYBROOIT ! ;ST E j
3 S W ___ STREET N NSW N P�NElRC�' m e
T i =�cKCL-DR URD ST
vi O YAR:LYN >1 LJ ` ��--11
< c;. cc
E `
If N s REILING
57
I-1 LMONTE GGRAIE
S.W. [
EMERALD NTS. i i i DR. CTli C^ • G.W.
S.W. NOODVIEW Q; S.W. SATTLER H T. ROSS Si
TIF� < S.w. KABLE ST STI el' .�
6 eA `
p4A_
ST u AaLCI • .�-. _
PO a Cl. Ti !ZS\OE1 i p F •
XI LwL �L• DORBUAN JPL.1
S Cr
C.[wAAo
Z A•
IL L ; � _ S Thr •.'a.A. � Q� � � �� I a t 3
1 N 9 � SW. DURHAM RD. /
Yf i N i j U` DUN
RNA
A - AV
O SW MARTHA
T ST
B
K
s�w
00!
11
KING � A �w �/
�.� JAMES 'q3 CT JULI
ST.
11 SYLVA �� MILLE 11
ROYAL = 1 CT ltd [I EI/1T ///�/ V ®�•m1�1 1����7
1 _ Z - F _ �l va� - ---_.- ✓=_7 ICC �p�bv®�Y� !�/�/ P 77
4 I
i 2RJERW'00D LN. (I
r... August 16, 1982
c
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Public Works Director ,!
SUBJECT: Parks Reservation Police
The staff changed its policy this year on how reservations are made for covered
areas and ball fields.
The emphasis is to place the responsibility on the applicant to find a vacant
day and time space in our log book for the facility he wishes to reserve.
Mr. Price chose a date and time when all facilities were booked up. We feel the
responsibility was his. The family that had previously signed up correctly were
kind enough to share the facilities with Emerson Hardwood Company.
1
r
t
f
f
j[
t
E
I
I
� f
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
July 29, 1982
James T. Price
Emerson Hardwood Company
P.O. Box 10604
Portland, Oregon 97210
Dear Mr. Price:
A review of our records show that the Hayes' family correctly signed up for
covered area #1 in accordance with our policy requiring the applicant to choose
a vacant time for the facility to be reserved from the log book and fill out
the application form accordingly. This was done by Anna Hayes five days prior
to your application. Also, Collete Hitchcock signed correctly for covered area
#2, five days prior to your application.
The time space for these covered areas was not available for you to choose.
We consider this to be your error and therefore, feel no refund is appropriate.
I do appreciate your comments regarding permit numbers being resigned and will
try to incorporate this in our policy as further check.
I also appreciate your comments regarding the condition of the area. It will
help us in the future.
Sincerely,
I
Frank A. Currie, P.E.
Director of Public Works
�.�.oa sos®stitititi�ore�m®r�®���
i
Emerson Mardw®®d Company
Distinctive Hardwoods Since 1907
August 5, 1982 `
f
i
Mr. Frank A. Currie, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
i
12755 S.W. Ash
Tigard, Or. 97223
Dear Mr. Currie;
i I am less than satisfied with your reply. Your inability
to maintain proper clerical records is not our fault and
surely did not stop you from taking our money. Unless
double billing is a City practice I would expect some
consideration to be given to both parties. involoved. .
Yours Very Truly,
EMERSON HARDWOOD CO.
k
i
F
i
f
' S
i
James T. Price
Sales Manager
r
JTP/ejl
i
l
2279 Northwest Front Street Portland,Oregon 97209 (503)227-6414
t
August 18, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Director
FROM: Planning Division `
SUBJECT: Annexations: Status of pending applications.
The Planning Division has put annexation proposals on hold for the last six
months due to the tremendous workload in other areas. It appears that staff
will now be able to proceed on these pending applications. The status of each
proposal is as follows:
Durham School - Annexed by the Boundary Commission with the Durham
Island. Application no longer required.
Highway 217 Right of Way Requires completion of Boundary Commission
paper work.
( Kvarnstrom - Requires completion. of Boundary Commission paper work.
Larsen/5200 - Requires certification of legal description by County.
McIntosh - Requires legal description to be written and certified.
None of the above proposals require Council action prior to submittal to the
Boundary Commission. Staff will work to get all of the above proposals
submitted to the Boundary Commission by August 31, 1982.
Y!� lfY1�1rYY•l�l�g�lfa-d -
t
I
M E M O R A N D U M
!. t
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BOB JEAN, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
t
DATE: AUGUST 20, 1982
a
f
SUBJECT: 72nd AVENUE L. I .D. , CONSENT AGENDA #2. 9/AGENDA ITEM #20 �
s
}
Unless Council prefers a Special Council meeting on Wednesday,
August 25, 1982, staff recommends that Council take the following
action by motion: t
1. That the City accept and authorize signatures for easements
and rights-of-way as originally presented to Council on
August 16, 1982 , SUBJECT TO approval by the Mayor_ on
August 25, 1982; and,
2. That revised Plans and Specifications for 72nd Avenue L. I .D.
be prepared by the City Engineer after the Executive Session
( of August 23 , 1982 , and SUBJECT TO approval by the Mayor on
August 25 , 1982; and,
3. That Agenda Item #20, 72nd Progress Report be removed from
the Agenda and that this memo be added to Consent Agenda as
Item #2. 9 .
Alternatively, staff requests that Council call a Special Council
meeting for Wednesday, August 25, 1982 , at Tigard City Hall ,
7: 30 p.m. , to discuss and act upon matters pertaining to the
72nd Avenue L. I .D.
RWJ dkr
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LINDA SARGENT, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
DATE: AUGUST 17 , 1982
SUBJECT: RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR FRANCHISED GARBAGE HAULERS
BACKGROUND
On July 12, 1982 , representatives from Frank ' s Disposal Service,
Miller ' s Sanitary Service and Schmidt' s Sanitary Service approached
Council regarding an adjustment in rates. (Proposals attached) .
Subsequently, staff met with the haulers July 26 to discuss
justification for the rate increase.
ISSUES
The Tigard Municipal Code, Section 11. 04. 090 , states that rates
shall be reasonable based upon the level of service rendered,
haul distance, dwelling unit density, types of waste and other
factors. However. , the TMC does not set forth criterion in
which to evaluate the level of rate increase.
Staff concurs that the haulers have experienced a significant
increase in costs due to hauling distance, fuel , disposal fees,
and the cost of meeting other government regulations .
Staff has surveyed surrounding jurisdictions and found:
RESIDENTIAL
1 can/per week/month COMMERCIAL
Washington $-4--County $5 . 20
Beaverton $4. 80 $5 . 20
Hillsboro $5. 45 $5 . 80
Forest Grove $5 . 25 $6 . 35
McMinnville $5. 45 $5 . 95
Milwaukie $5 . 05 $5 . 60
Tualatin $5. 85 $4. 60
King City $4. 35 N/A
Multnomah $6. 75 $6 . 00
CContinued. . .
I
�m ®�
y v d cu
m m m En
co tt ca w
a a3a, a, a,
m � �. IJ
cc U
$4 H
dr. H H G
}-� H
Q1 a) cu
1 04
a7 PG 04 P
1J l4
Rcli O O O O
W W W Gs+
3 b0
a f.4 .,4 �,
4.J 4-j 4-J
L44 co co co cti
_ rl
O •'•1 •1-+ _ •r1
v p -4 O oo O oo O O oo O O N N O N r+ N
J..1 w oo to 1 OO i oo oo I •--� oO oo oo oo oo oo oo
N N I a) .--� I I O 1 a) I 1 1 I 1 I
a)
4
N
1J
co
PG
J-7
C
a
m cn O O O Lr) �O O U1 O O 00 O Lr) U1 O O
N -T O t!1 N r-
M u'1 �7 00
Pa.4
�O �O �O Lr
1�4 co
al a1
cd r-I m aJ O w cn >1 t-+ Ia
O N 7. • 4 >. cn Q. C m V >, cti cn cn s.s .--1
co ca ca o. •�+ cn Q H co •�+ v v a C as
W (1) aJ cn L.; m O ca as G oO CLO w O rn
a� w to �4 �+ —4 :+ a� m •r+ co ca co cc U O
6 c0 c0 C m C Cl > >O OCs � En p a � C �
cd A 114 S. cn IG-+ cn m H m 1•+ m cn u co cb ct7 O rl
•r4 •rl a) 0 •rI u 0 J A
Z C�7 C�7
C0 7 W A C m C7 cu
H N —1
U co 3 v .-1 aJ s+ f+ ai O � .0 mai a>1 ai o
•C b •,A ctf C ca a) a p m 44 m
H cr1 O -4 > 4J 14 b W t4 4j C0 —I '-1 n —1
d
co ca O aI n7 O a O O C cv as cti
0 d d PQ A U U U W W PG to cn 7 3 3 .
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 17, 1982
RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR FRANCHISED GARBAGE HAULERS
PAGE TWO
Porter and Waterhouse, a consulting firm suggests that an industry
should operate on a 10% net profit margin. Miller ' s Sanitary
Service has offered that their net profit stands at 4 . 1% . The
rates may be adjusted a percentage point per month to the 10%
net profit margin.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff does not recommend either for or against the 14% increase
of garbage rates to $6 . 77/residential can pick up since no
evaluation criterion is set forth in the TMC. Staff does find
the present rates slightly higher than surrounding jurisdictions,
however, the costs addressed by the haulers appear to be accurate.
A resolution increasing garbage rates by the proposed level is
attached, if the Council should choose to adopt such.
LS : dkr
Attachments
MEW
July 27, 1982
Schmidt`s Sanitary Service, Inc.
3325 S.W. Ross Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
City of Tigard
Attention: Linda Sargent
After meeting with the City Council and with you
concerning a rate increase, we have broken our costs of operation
down to percentages for the first quarter of 1981 and the first
quarter of 1982. The attached listings show our breakdown for
operating. The average is a 12% increase in our costs of operation.
Therefore, we are requesting an increase of 14% which
is 90¢ per can; from the present rate of $5.85 per can to $6.75
per can. The loose container rate will reflect this same increase.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Larry Schmidt, Vice-president
Schmidt`s Sanitary Service, Inc .
June 15, 1982
Schmidt' s Sanitary Service, Inc .
8325 S.W. Ross Street
Tigard, Oreon 97223
639-5655 939-2378
TO the Mayor and City Council Members of Tigard;
At this time our company requests a rate adjustment in
the prices we charge for garbage service in the City of Tigard.
Our last rate adjustment was in October 1980 and went
into effect January 1981. Since that time our company has ex-
perienced two postal increases, labor contract increases, and
two dumping increases. Rossman' s and Newberg landfills are
going to close shortly. The only available alternative for
us at this time is to haul to St. John' s landfill in North
Portland adding to our mileage and fuel costs. We are also
expecting an increase in the Metro user fees. Truck costs
and maintenance of trucks has increased steadily in this time.
In order for Schmidt' s Sanitary Service to continue to
provide clean and efficient service in Tigard, we would like
to schedule a date at A City Council work session to sit and
discuss this rate adjustment request with you. At this session
we can provide our figures for operational costs and answer
any questions you may have.
Thank) you,
Lary Schmidt, Vice-president
Schmidt' s Sanitary Service, Inc.
E
�s
s.
Schmidt, s Sanitary Service Inc.
8325 S. W. Ross
Tigard, Or. 97223
Reportable Items Base period Current Period
Quarter ending Quarter Ending %
44,4e Y F .1"lilt 9-2-
Truck Operating expense $1854.00 $5799,00 312'
Office Expense $844.00 $1122. 00 132
Disposal Costs $1160.00 $3147. 00 271
Total of Categories $3858.00 $10,098.00 238
%change in Teamsters
contract since base period. 20
I
E
Signature of owner or Corporate officer
Schmidt' s Sanitary Service, Inc.
8325 S.W. Ross Street
Tig Tigard, Oregon 97223
City of Tigard
Attention Linda Sargent
1981 1982
Telephone 26.90/month 37.89/month 14%
Advertisiog 22. 35 25.15 11%
Insurance 5492.00 6019.00 11%
P U C rate 18.5 20.0 11%
Landfill fees 9.07/yard 10.15/yard 11%
Pension fund 155.70/person 164. 35/person 11%
Health ins.
128. 38 156. 57 10. 5%
Wages 9.51/hour 10. 31/hour 11�
Gas 1.23/gallon 1. 21/gallon
Office 11%
18%
Accounting
:Maintenance of trucks and parts 14%.
average of increases 12%
Y
7
Schmidt,s Sanitary Service Inc.
' 8325 S. W. Ross
Tigard, Or. 97223
Reportable Items Base period Current Period
Quarter ending: Quarter Ending %
Truck Operating expense $1854.00 $5799,00 312
Office Expense $844.00 $1122.00 132
Disposal Costs $1160.00 $3147.00 271
f
Total of Categories $3858.00 $10,098.00 238
%cha.nge in Teamsters
contract since base period. 20
Signature of owner or Corporate officer
l
9
C
E
t
f
Schmidt.s Sanitary Service,Inc. t
8325- S. W. Ross St.
Tigard,Or. 97232
1981 1982
Telephone 26.90 $ 37.89 14%
$ 25015 11%. i
Advertising 22.35
Insurance for Year $ 5a492.00 $ 6.019.00
11%
PUC Rate 18.5 20.0 11% E
Y
Landfill Fees 9.07 pr yd 10.15 11.% E
Pension Fund 1.55.70 per person 164.35 11I
i
Health Insurande 128.38 156.57 10.5 %
Wages Per Hr. 9.51 10.31
11%
Gas
123 per Gal 121
11%
Office
�
E
t
Present-Rate
Accounting 18%
Maintaince of Trucks Parts .Labor 14%1
E
Present Rate $5.85 1 Can per geek
Proposed hate
i
k
nine
1
f i
Sp4ciclised Container
contrccl--fvlont:,y f
s?��.5P Of6T " E
L
�.) rsir er ".rc'CI.
. ... ,.�` ail`•
t
�gg
city of Tigard
12420 U;.i r.
'igard, Orego-n ;;7�
a
nate {equ
LI1iS request 1`• :�� ie nee 'ssar_ E C=51_:t' O_ tho cont.:i;:1:.:.:1 lricrc ase
3iuce <�:.. last Zd ust-ment, October 7.^80 t
in operating expenses. Since
Y
3arzuary
1981, ire have l.ar_i two labor increa:-
be charged
beginning
two disposal increases, in::reased true': op+�r: r;.n ' eut�cnse3 to
^1 1981, two postale changes and r.'an -� .r.r .acres s
cz—
December ,
About 85% of our. c::penses „a... i.r.:re-.=ed by
a
We are now facing, again ne?,r lietro user fees .-nd. acld tional +.i.spos�'s
costs to say nothin;f about the security of present dis,osai fac"'ti
Our company is requesting r-if--e adjustuent to :seep up With tines:
operational costs in corductiD_ our business. Could you scheduL:
vs into one of
your. work se�s__� :: 3> soor:
Si-+ce_-ely
Carl R Miller, President
I,J T�i EtZ r c 13ANITARY sERSFICE, INC.
CR'i/b
TRF,r-)I'�G Pr!ZCj7'7AC7.' 0" =',A?.!, GAR3A11-177
Name of Collector:
Address: -17r-L S'7 cooit-01
Portia-.7i,!, Oroi- 97219
Telephone Number: '-144-42.53
Base Period Current Period
Quarter Ending Quarter Ending
Reportable Items Mlarch 31. 1979 ?.=ch 31, 19?0 Percentn^e Chan-_e
TRUCK OFFRATING
EXPENSE (includes 1,499 2, 151 143
the following-
expenses: gas and
diesel, tires, main-
tenance and repair,
miscellaneous route
expense, shop
expense)
OFFICE EKPENSE 102
(includes the follow-
ing expense: printing,
legal, accounting,
telephone, computer
services,. postage
and collection
expense)
DISPOSAL EXPENSE 2,363 3, 125 132
Total of Above
Expense Categories 4,558 5,1 8 131
Percentage Change
in Teamsters Contract
Since Base Period 13.4":_
r
REPORT COMPLETED BY: _ ` �- Qi-C/]
Signature of Owner or Corporate officer
Page 1
M
REVISED SANITARY SERVICE QUARTERLY REPORT
garc. F C"I SC, roe:
Name of Collector: TiILLER' S SANNTTIiRY- SERVICE, INC.
Address: ,150 SW Ali,er Street
E-�,-verLcn, Oregon 97005
Telephone Number: X44-i;161
t%vc,--,<ge per. quarter (19 .L)
Base Period Current Period
Quarter Ending Quarter Ending
Reportable Items March 31, 1980 March 31, 198 Percentaze Chance
TRUCK OPERATING 1 7-7%
EXPENSE (includes 2,151.100 "-J5o67
the following
expenses: gas and
diesel, tires, main-
tenance and repair,
miscellaneous route
expense, shop
expense)
OFFICE EXPENSE 712.00 1,053.29 148%
(includes the follow-
ing expense: printing,
legal, accounting,
telephone, computer
services, postage
and collection
expense)
DISPOSAL EXPENSE 3,125.00 4,038.46 129% X
Total of Above
Expense Categories 5,188.00 8,467.42 1.63%
Percentage Change
in Teamsters Contract
Since Base Period 13.4% (81) + 8% (82)
REPORT COMPLETED BY:
Signature of Owner or Corporate Officer
Page 1 ✓
1981 LABOR COSTc:
: :AGES : S10.46 per hour = $21 . 68 per day _ $418. 40 per week = $21, 756. 80
9 Holidays C& $83,68 if nct worked = 753. 12
(1 floater to be a day off with pay)
dy4z" 8 Holidays $167. 36 If ,7orked = $1, 338. 88
Ls
$22, 509. 92
:ICA MATCHING TAX: f' 6 . 400A = 1, 440.6;
SAIF: @ $13. 31 per $ 100.00 of payroll = 2, 996, 0
TEAMSTER PENSION: C& . 82G per hour or $141. 86 per month 1, 702. 32
HEALTH & WELFARE INSURANCE: (,;+> $ 128. 18 per month 1 , 540,
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT TAX: @ 2. 21/. of $10, 000
— 220. 00
FEDERAL UNEMP143YMMNT TAX: CSP 0. 7%. of $6, 000 42.00
TRI-NISI' TAX: 05� .0050" of $22 , 579. 92 = 112.55
$30, 564. 05
Replacement Costs for 2 week vacation
rased on Helper Wage of $9. 51 per hour 1, 130.60
Total Cost $31,694,65
Replacement costs for 3 week vacation
based on Helper Wage of $9.51 per hour 1, 533, 26
Total Cost $32,097. 31
1' 82 LABOP- COS'IrS
WAGES : $11.26 per hour $90. 08 po da.. S450. 40 per week a S23 ,-t20. 80
9 Hol- days (S) $90. 08 if not worked X310. 72
(1 floater to be a C.ay of f with pa-,,7'
8 Holidays CeP $180. 16 if worI-:ed = $1 ,441 . 28
` 24, 231 , -52
FIC-A MATCHING TAX: e? 6 . 701` = I .C.23 . 51
SAIF : @0 $11.46 per $100. 00 of payrol-I 2 , i76. 9 ,
TEAMSTER PENSION: . 904:: per hour or $ 1155. 70 per month= 1 , 868. 4n
HEALTH & WELFARE INSURANCE: 01, 5 .156 . 57 Per month = 1 , 878. 84
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT TAX: 2- - of $ 1- 1, 000 220- 00
FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT TAX: 0. 7 > of Y6,000 42 . 00
TRI-MET TAX: .005% of Y24, 231. 52 12i. 1F
-$' 32, 762 . 36
Replacement Costs for 2 weeks vacation
based on Helper Wage of 510. 31 per hour 1, 229- 54
Total Cost $33 , 991 . 19
Replacement Costs for 3 weeks vacation
based on Helper Wage of $1-0. 31 per hour 1, 766 . 03
Total Cost $34, 528. 39
ua
.,UC105 1�.- 'iii.. iCARi) Ci. - i _. .,.'�:..`_i I i:� „al';h:�t
t. iE'EA5 ~h• ?: Lrnpc? _tri r. --.t-_ - t ,r:._.. ,. ,` osc,d r.-ite . .- _ . c...
v- Octob 1 , 19 0 aci
t:HEREAS, on Sept ..icer 15 , rescnt_t1VL�5 of :il._
,, e isposaI coaip::.ties ser•.• _: „ rhe Cite n: Tigard appeared be;,-)re clic C,.
Co presc-t ev,--]c•cCe _.. •' . rt _e-auc..r :or 1-&C _iF es; a,i._
Ufii:REAS, t,,e CoU.._i 1 ha. _eer.
r t•�d ;nrre•.iti -. Jc=sr_iii : flilci r,•_cc�. rte �n ace. :nr of inr_ r�a::ed cis
o i t!,'• business C,14- Lt: : =canci:_., _ _s ivr sucl11 i reins .as inc real, -
1 - �. •
:.i R:ST7 1i fi3LS , li �:r�`IISC'S i�'_UCr >t.'.. :�1 rt',::5�.'d '-i!:<'CiFil CDS:. > , =?'.'ii
WHEREAS, clic 1'_ ,:,rc C_ty _ I wis ...s L.. increase the CUrr_..t
tranch ist2 col lecLion rates tc? -::-,Vey t11:, =ncrE!
N ; !"E I.. � t'. 11. _ .:;O1VL:: t!!at Zhe Lo;100- -
.:�t,r, T ;E.��,i�o..i:. , tete •rigarci Cit:/ cou,•t. - .
-;�hedule be• adopted, ..: near- .'
�OLIi) t•IASr.: i)TSPUS:�L
jANUTTAP,' 1931
RES I DEN'i'
1 Can $ 5.85 Cans no:. to exceed 32 gallons ; mon.'-_liy
2 Can:; $11 .00 Ci,arge; 0 a stop per week; Any naul=.n,.
Each ad:ii tional can $ 5.20 o.• services other than monthly
be bused or, WILL CALTI rates .
Extra Charges
The fol lowi.no ext rn charges, per ...onr_h are '
p :pi.]-i�a�l_ moi,
on ground level) .
occassior! al Extra C_i e:i
WILL CALL 3.00
Second Can t.,f;
Service Charge (return for pick-
up of inaccessible can) 5:.75
Bundles (1 ft by 5 ft) 1 .85
Boxes equivalent to 32 gallon can 1.85
Re—Starts because of delinquency .3.45
One flight of stairs 25% <'.nc;itional
Two flights of stairs 50% additional
Special Services-Containers Delivered ,?n _al? $17- 10 One Time rU�.•- s
5.50/day Demurrage charge after 48 hour:; 14 .80 second Tim.
�1
Cut_ t 1__L C__L.. Rr•_ L:5___ i:Jil_-Illy
1'•.:U :. .,�, . per.. :�cc:_ .1 . . .. ��, ,5 , .
t.
Fo,l, tL.i; per we, ':
_ per. teu:
. .C.
Extra Charges
The following e':C.:<i CI?<_r ,'� pL:r �_U^!::, _'i�^i ..C�J1c I:C. :U:,.Rt:rC:.� � ratE'.` f I
ground
uccassi-nal E::tra Can
WILL CALL. 3,OJ,
Secun d Can
i
t
Service. charge (return zor pick-
up of inaccessible ca:: )
l
Bundles ( I ft by 5 ft)
L
Boxes equivalent to 32 g.il. can I.b. ;
Re-Starts be-ause of delinquency 3-4- E
One flight of stairs 257 additional 1
r � 4
T-ao flights of stairs 507 additional
Number of Stan's per '(eek and Charges pur l;onth
CONTAINER SERVICE - LOOSF
ONE j T1d0 THFE E FOUR Eit'L iy
ONE h 1/4 YARD S 40.25 c 73.70 $105.40 ? 136.20 ,$162.,5 185. '
Each additional 35.60 65.20 05.4:,0 120.65 J-;4 .00 1C4 .:+';
ONE & 1/2 YARD !i5.75 85.20 125.90 159.50 192.b0 222 . ? ;
Each Additional 41 .80 77.00 : i 2.55 141 -60
TWO YAPD 50.35 16 . 10 16 2• 2051.5O � • ;,i � ,
Each Additional 54.35 99.30 137.95 172.75 20(;. 75 239. _:i'
THREE YARD 77.30 144.55 203.60 254 .90 311.40 348.1
Each Additional 70.65 133.40 190.25 246.00 300.25 335..,_:
FOUR YARD 94.25 178.5E 255.70 325.50 389,60 454 .65
Each Additional 88.25 169.60 246.80 319.50 381.45 1,36 .i; )
FIVE YARD 109.00 209.60 305.10 395.80 473 .85 556.00
Each Additional 105.15 196.45 288.80 375.10 455.30 5?4 .50
Page 2
RESOLUTION No. 80- 9 T
T
i'HPE, E ;r^t I V'
_._... 'iU
. _ - _l 9 o J i�) ",6.c
2
80.30
E2.).70 324 .90 41i. .'Ju
li07. :) 503..._+
CHARGES FOR DRO' BOX SF.E-'r�Cw
17WENTY YAR 1) _-T;
Unc _ale _
THIa'i . 'e" .[:D '3.45/la}'
o��` Time i. 7E_ 139 .-
.5ii/ray Z2 - " C :
.
Miley€;e Rages
$-85 pc': mile over 24 miles roundtrip to th;! + h
�a..�fill (�.i,it..,,rized)
DROP BOY SE.RVICE3 - COMPACTED
L5 YARD ;101.84'
:.'0. YARD 107.95
:0 YARD 149.55
12 YARD 159.:6
,0 YARD 198.90
ASSED: This —2��`' day of }
of Tigard. _" t i_ t: t
r:ayor - 'C ity of Tigard - -. TEST:
corder - city of Ti and ~
+
r,
.,E 3
Olur-ion No. 80- Qr-
AK m
�'" Y'r'ESE>tiT TIGARD Pj%TE
Government impose fee - (-,ceoi)cr 81)
Another pass til-_u justified January
If we add so cal 1 government tax .28
Rate 7ould now be 6.1.
Rate requested 11'
On Base Rate = $.64
N:W RATE first can
12.75 second c,-!n f
1
i
1981 Cross 133,556
i
E:_pense 128,206 4
Net Profit 4.1 [
i
State & Federal Tax 3,451.80 1
Net Return after Tax 1,928.13
(p
t
s
i
F
{{F[
I
i
DISPOSAL. SERVICE, INC.
P.O. Sox 23293 ® Tigard, Oregon 97223 • Phone 639-2114
July 26, 1982
City Council
City of Tigard, Oregon
SUBJDGT: Proposed Service Rate Increase
Gentlemen:
Frank's Disposal. Service, Inc. respectfully presents this service rate
increase proposal to the council for its immediate consideration. The
existing rate schedule for our services has been in effect for eighteen _
months now.
During this period our company has experienced increased costs of
operation in all phases of the disposal business, with the most acute
increases being in the areas of our predominant operating expenses; specifi-
cally, truck operating costs, wages and disposal fees. In addition we have
been forced to rely upon outside financing to acquire and maintain the
equipment necessary to meet the needs of our customers, and the current
interest rates have become a significant pe-rt of our expenses.
Unfortunately, as is generally the case in an industry franchised by
local government, our service rates have not kept pace with the continually
rising costs of operation and we are forced to again seek your approval of
rate increases for both residential and commercial services. We have
enclosed schedules indicating the rates we are proposing for both commercial
and residential customers. Additional financial and other information is
provided to aid you in evaluating our rate increase request.
Again, we regret having to seek increases of this nature, but we are
confident that you understand the environment in which we are all living and
working, and that you will give careful consideration to our request. _
Very truly yours,
Herb Frank
r President
Better �/�a/th
••tet Sanitation Be your Gude to •`
i
I
FRANK'S DISP3SAL SERVICE:, INC.
STATEMENT RHGAR.DING PROR)SED RATE INCREASE
Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. has been operating the past eighteen
months in an environment in which its operating costs have been increasing.
The Company has been working to hold the line on those expenses which can
be controlled, but unfortunately, the major costs of operating a disposal
service are not controllable by any one company.
Labor costs and disposal fees are examples of costs over which the
Company exercises little control. Labor union contracts must be honored and
I
dumpage fees must be paid to landfill operators who have little or no com-
petition. There is little or no opportunity in either case to shop around
for a better deal.
The Conpany has been working to control its other expenses while main-
taining or improving the quality of the service provided to its customers.
We believe that we have achieved a measure of success in this task in spite
of the negative business environment in which we are working.
In the past two years, we have been faced with the problem of replacing
and enlarging the size of our fleet of trucks in order to meet expanding
service demands. This task is almost completed, but at high cost in terms
of borrowed funds and high interest rates.
In the eighteen months since our last rate increase we have acquired
four trucks, and the funds to add these trucks were borrowed at interest
rates from 16.5% to 19.6% The addition of this newer, more reliable equip-
ment has resulted in fewer breakdowns and less overtime for employees.
APR
I�
Frank's Disposal Service, Inc.
Statement regarding proposed rate increase.
Page Two
However, the Company is presently locked into these interest rates for a 5
year period, regardless of future interest rate movements.
In addition to interest costs, the price of a new truck has increased r
dramatically, in spite of the current recession. The basic truck operated
by the Company could be acquired new in December of 1980 for approximately
$32,000. The same truck today would cost $40,000 new, an increase of 25%.
Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. has been able to lessen the impact of this
increase by shopping for and acquiring used trucks in good condition. To
accomplish this however, the management has had to shop all over the United
States and travel some distance to obtain good quality equipme.•z.
In spite of the cost reductions which the Company has accomplished,
significant increases in truck operating costs, disposal fees and labor '
coats have occurred, and because of these factors, we can no longer delay
our request for an increase in rates.
Fuel costs have fluctuated during the past eighteen months from a low
of $1.08/g311on for gas and $.93/gallon for diesel fuel in December 1980 to
a high of $1.30/gallon for gas and $1.14/gallon for diesel in October 1981,
an overall increase of 21%. From October 1981 and until May 1982 fuel '
i
prices have decreased, but they have recently turned up again, and are
expected to continue to increase steadily through the end of this year.
In addition to the fuel costs, the cost of labor and parts for repair-
pairing trucks and equipment has risen in excess of 31%, and tires cost
M--0 13-0 1 W-�-0--M�W
i
Frank's Disposal Service, Inc.
i
Statement regarding proposed rate increase.
Page Three
F
1.
21% more than eighteen months ago. By the very nature of the disposal
business, truck operating expenses are a significant part of overall opera-
tions and increased costs in this area have to be passed on to customers
through increases.
The increases in our disposal fees and labor costs are of significance i
and are directly responsible for this rate increase request.
The Company's disposal fees paid to the landfill have doubled in the
past twelve months and additional increases are expected in the near future.
As pointed out before, the rates charged us at the landfill are uat of our i
control, and we have little choice as to where we dump the garbage.
The increases we have experienced this past year are significant and we
feel obligated to recover these costs through a rate increase. ,
4
1
The labor increases are an industry-wide phenomenon — the result of
collectively bargained agreements which must be honored by the Company
whether or not the management feels the increases are justified. Included {
f
with the information submitted with this rate request is an analysis of the
i
labor costs over the eighteen month period since our last rate increase.
There have been two increases during this time, and we are expecting another
i
effective January 1, 1983. The data supplied in the analysis represents the
cost of one union employee for one full year. It should be noted that each
i
. i
ii
a
4
t
F
LW
S
Frank's Disposal Service, Inc.
Statement regarding proposed rate increase. u
Page Four
l
union employee is earning $5,761 more in wages and benefits than eighteen
F
months ago. This increase amounts to 21 .1% overall - a significant increase
in light of the fact that union labor accounts for almost 40% of the
Company's total operating expenses.
We have attempted in this narrative to shed light on several major f
factors leading to this rate increase request. Other directly related
operating expenses have not been specifically addressed, but we have
enclosed with this request a Quarterly Report comparing our operating costs
in the Tigard Franchise area for the quarters ended December 31 , 1981 and
1580. it should be noted that the actual amounts indicated on this report
represent increases in general operating costs through December 31, 1981
only, and increases since then are not reported. Thus this report tends to
t
give a conservative picture of our operations.
We are in the near future facing several additional increases,
a new union contract to become effective
including disposal expense and E
z
January 1, 1983• At present we have no idea of the extent of these l
increases nor their impact on our operations. However, we will keep the f
city informed of major changes.
G
s
r
f
t
I
i
i
• i
REVISED SANITARY SERVICE QUARTERLY REPORT
i
Frank's Disposal Service, Inc.
a of Collector: s
P. O. Box 23293 s
•:ress:
Tigard, Oregon 97223
3
(503) 639-2114
',I0phone Number:
f
Projected Expenses ?
Base Period Current Period (see note bslaw) !
Quarter Ending Quarter Ending Percentage Quarter Ending Percentage
e�ortabie Items Dec. 31, 1980 Dec. 31, 1981 Change Dec. 31, 1982 Change
— F
t
:CK OPERAT i NG -
�EySE (includes 24,777.56 25,886.44 4.5E increase 25,886.00
t+e fol lowing
penses: gas and
iesel, tires, main-
mance and repair,
iscellaneous route i
;en Se, shop
panse) F
0
ME EXPENSE 3,608.29 4,296.54 19.1E increase 4.297.00 -
includes the follow-
ng expenses: printing,
e•3al, accounting, x
elephone. computer 1
rvices, postage and
llection expense)
ISPOSAL EXPENSE 21,103.10 30,100.86 42.6E increase 34,966.00 16.2E
t
oral of Above
x;ense Categories 49,488.95 60.283.84 21.8E increase 65,149.00 8.1� `t
ercentage Change
n Teamsters Contract 8.3E increase
ince Base Period l0E increase
f
ervices Provided
S 9,674.O0 3); decrease 9,675.00 -O-
Management S 10,108.00
s
s
tomanagement of the company is responsible
or the general operation of the business.
Lrchasing, personnel management, customer }
ervice and customer relations, payrol
-tinistration, public relations, including
e;orting to and coordination with governmental
envies, development of company management
licies, design of special services and develop
-
-it of new business.
''E O'J PROJECTED EXPENSES:
e effects The projected expenses indicated above show thects of increases in ereine fees and union wages which
c'ually went into effect on January 1, 1982. No other increases over 1981 were included.
RAport Completed By-1^�
Signature of Owner or Corporate Officer
O �
FRANK'S DISPOSAL SERVICE:, INC.
Labor Cost Analysis
Following is an analysis of the annual cost of one full--tine garbage collec-
i;
tor. The data presented covers the period from our last rate increase request to i
t;
the present time and represents the provisions of negotiated union contracts.
r
Overall per-
t: ,
tentage increase
since last rate
Effective date of union contract 1-1-80 1-1-81 1-1-82 increase request 4
Gross wages $ 19,677 $ 22,510 $ 24,232 23.1%
Payroll taxes and workmen's
u.
compensation insurance
4,940 ?-3%
(employer's share) 4,606 4,990
Teamster pension 1 ,702 1,868 1,972 15.9%
Teamster health and welfare 1,277 1,541 1,879 47.1%
Totals $ 27,262 $ 30,909 $ 33,023 21.1%
6
�i
i
i
i
I
FRANK'S DISPJSAL SERVICE, INC. �
I
PRESENT SOLID WASTE 0L)U,ECl ION RATES
TIGARD i
Effective January 1 , 1981
IRESIDENTIAL RATES
One Can $ 5.85 On Call Service $ 3.00
Two Cans 11.00
Each Additional 5.20
II. CXMi:11EKCIAL RATES
STOPS PER WEEK
A. CANS
One TWO Three Four Five Six
One 6.20 11.90 17.75 23.60 29.55 35.80
Two 11.60 22.05 32.90 43.85 54.75 65.65
Each Additional 4.60 9.10 13.55 18.05 22.55 27.00 I '_
1}i
B. CONTAINER SERVICE - LOUSE j
STOPS PER WEEK
Occas-
One TWO Three Four Five Six Tonal
Container
Size I
One yard 34.65 63.80 91.55 I
Each additional '
i
One and 1/4 yards 40.25 73.70 105.40 136.20 162.55
Each additional 35.60 65.20 93.40 120.65 144.00 1
One and 1/2 yards 45.75 88.20 125.90 159.50 192.60
Each additional 41.80 77.00. 112.55 141.60 170.10
Two yards 60.35 114.10 162.45 205.50 247.50
Each additional 54.35 99.30 137.95 172.75 206.75
Three yards 77.30 144.55 203.60 254.90 311.40
Each additional 70.65 133.40 190.25 246.00 300.25
Four yards 94.25 175.50 255.70 325.50 389.60
Each additional 88.25 1.69.60 246.80 319.50 381.45
Five yards 109.00 209.60 305.50 395.80 473.85
Each additional 105.15 198.45 288.80 375.10 455.30
Six yards 120.00 230.05 335.80 433.95 529.40
Each additional 115.45 221.15 322.40 411.95 501 .23
Eight yards 144.20 275.40 398.90 516.70 626.05 1
Each additional 138.10 263.50 381.30 493.05 596.35
i
(
_CNK'S DISFWAL SE9VICEo INC.
�ti;1U WASTE COLLE(MON RATES
jL;ARD
.ge Two
C. CONTAINIM SERVICE - COMPACTED
STOPS PER WEEK
Occas-
One Two Three Four Five Six Tonal
One yard 80.30 147.20 210.60 272.20 324.90 371.40
Two yards 120.70 228.20 324.90 411.00 495.00 598.20
Three yards 154.60 289.10 407.20 509.80 622.80 697.40
- I
D. DROP BOX SERVICE
Regular Occasional
Service Service
Twenty yard box 72s.60 86.40
97.95 Rental (53.45/day after
48 hours) !;
Thirty yard box 99.65 107.90
50.60 Rental ($4.60/day after
- 48 hours)
�i
III. MISCELLANEOUS RATES
A. Court apartments F. One flight of stairs
(five or more units):
1 stop per week 4.60 G. Two flights of stairs !
2 stops per week
H. Return for pickup of
B. Extra garbage per can 1.85 inaccessible can
C. Call backs 5.75 I. Extra distance -
_� per foot after
D. Bundles the first 100 feet
E. Boxed refuse or an
equivalent amount of �I
loose refuse
ti
FRANK'S UISFX_3 A'L SERVICE. INC.
- PROPOSED SOLID WASTE COLF� 'IUv RATES
TIGARD
RESIDENTIAL RATES I
$ 6.77 On Call Service $ 3.45
One Can I
Two Cans 1.2.75
Each Additional 6.00
F, OUMMERCIAL RATES
STOPS PER WEEK
A. CANS
One 'I%,o Three Four Five Six
One 7.18 13.77 20.54 27.31 34.20 41.43
TWO 13.42 25.52 38.07 50.75 63.36 75.97
Each Additional 5.32 10.53 15.68 20.89 26.10 31.25
8. OONTAINER SERVICE - LOSE
STOPS PER WEEK
Occas-
One TWO Three Four Five Six ional
Container
Size
One yard 40.10 73.83 105.95
Each additional
One and 1/4 yards 46.58 85.29 121.98 157.62 188.11
Each additional 41.20 75.45 108.09 139.62 166.65
One and 1/2 yards 52.94 102.07 145.70 184.58 222.89
Each additional 48.37 89.11 130.25 163.87 196.85
69.84 1.32.04 188.00 237.82 286.42
Two yards
114.92 159-64 199.92 239.26
Each additional 62.90
89.46 167.28 235.62 294.99 360.37
Three yards 'I
Each additional 81.76 154.38 `220.17 284.69 347.47
Four yards 109.07 203.10 295.91 376.69 450.87
Each additional 102.13 196.27 285.61 369.74 441 .44 t
Five yards 126.14 242.56 353.54 458.04 548.37
Each additional 121.69 229.66 334.22 434.09 526.90
Six yards 138.87 266.23 388.61 502.19 612.65
Each additional 133.61 255.93 373.10 476.73 580.05
Eight yards
166.88 318.71 461.63 597.96 724.50
Each additional 159.82 304.94 441.26 570.59 690.13
..,4NK,S L)fSR)SAL SERVICE, INC.
�O"ED SOLID WASTE 0OLL`ECrION RATES
J^ TWO
C. CONTAINER SERVICE - COMPACTED
STOPS PER WEEK
Uccas-
One TWO Three Four Five Six _ ional
One yard 92.93 170.35 243.72 315.01 375.99 429.81
Two yards 139.68 264.09 375.99 475.63 572.84 692.27
Three yards 178.91 334.56 471.24 589.97 720.74 807.07
D. DROP BOX SERVICE
Regular Occasional
Service Service---99-.99
ervice
Twenty yard box 90.96 yy•`-)`-)
113.35 Rental ($3.99/day after a
48 hours)
Thirty yard box 115.32 124.87
58.56 Rental ($5.32/day after
48 hours)
MISCELLANEOUS RATES
A. Court apartments F. One flight of stairs
(five or more units):
1 stop per week 5.32 G. Two flights of stairs
2 stops per week
• H. Return for pickup of
r can 2.14 inaccessible can
B. Extra garbage per .
C. Call backs 6.65 I. Extra distance -
¢ per foot after
the first 100 feet
D. Bundles
E. Boxed refuse or an
equivalent amount of
loose refuse
R.
August 19, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning Staff o"/`
SUBJECT: Addition of Financial, Insurance, and Real Estate services as a
Permitted Use in an M-4, Industrial Park Zone.
On August 3, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to City Council the
list of permitted uses be amended to include Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services in the M-4 zone.
o Enclosed is a copy of the old list (prior to June 21, 1982), of permitted uses
allowed in an M-4, Industrial Park Zone. Please note number twelve (12):
Office buildings, banks; which includes any type of offices or financial
services. Under the new Permitted Uses in an M-4 Zone (also attached),
adopted by City Council on June 21, 1982, there are two office use types
listed. Business support service and professional and administrative services
are listed as office use types. Financial, Insurance, and Real Estate
Services as a use type includes banks, insurance agencies and real estate
firms.
lw
i
i
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE No. 82-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.48.010, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE, OF THE TIGARD
MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. j
i
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Section 18.48.010 - Permitted Uses, is hereby added to and made a i
part of the Tigard Municipal Codes as follows: Under Permitted
Uses (2) Commercial Use Types add, in alphabetical order, the
following:
i
Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services
Section 2: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and safety of
the public that the foregoing amendment to the Tigard Municipal
Code become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared
to exist, and this ordinance shall be effective upon its passage
by the Council and approval by the Mayor.
PASSED: By vote of all Council members
present, after being read two times by number and title only,
this day of , 1982.
r.
1
l
City Recorder - City of Tigard
a
APPROVED: By the Mayor, this day of . 1982•
Mayor - City of Tigard
ORDINANCE NO. 82-
WR I MOM
18 . 52 .010
Chapter 18. 52
INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE (M-4)
Sections :
18. 52.010 Permitted uses.
18. 52.020 Conditional uses.
18.52.030 Lot requirements.
18. 52.040 Setback requirements.
18. 52.050 Building height.
18. 52. 060 Enclosure or sc.>-eening required.
18. 52.070 Landscaping.
18. 52.080 Administration.
18.52.090 Additional requirements.
18. 52.010 Permitted uses. No building structures or
land shall be used and no building or structure shall here-
after be erected, enlarged or altered in the M-4 zone except
for the following uses:
( 1) Assembly and manufacture of electrical appliances ,
electronic instruments and devices, radios , phonographs and
television and components thereof;
( 2) Assembly (only) of metal products;
( 3) Battery manufacture;
( 4) Dairy. product manufacture (other than creamery) ;
( 5). Laboratories , experimental, dental, medical, photo
or motion picture research or testing;
( 6) Manufacture of ceramic products, using only pre-
viously pulverized clay;
( 7) Manufacture of musical instrumei.:.s;
( 8) Manufacture of optical goods, scientific and pre-
cision instruments and equipment;
( 9) Manufacture of artificial limbs, dentures, hearing
aids, surgical instruments and dressings, and other devices
employed by the .medical and dental professions;
(10) Manufacture, compounding, processing, packaging
or treatment of such products as bakery goods, candy, cos-
metics, dairy products,. toilet soap, toiletries (excluding
the refining and rendering of fats and oils) and food and
beverage products;
(11) Medicine and pharmaceutical manufacture;
(12) Office buildings, bank;
(13) Plastic molding, including the maufacture of
plastic products;
(14) Research, development and testing laboratories;
* For sign regulations, see Section 16 .36 .050 of this
code.
282
CHAPTER 18.52
INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE
M-4
Section 18.52.010 -- Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
Public support facilities
Parking services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
- Agricultural sales
- Agricultural services
- Animal sales and service
a. auctioning
b. kennels
c. veterinary (large & small .animals)
—Automobile and equipment
a. cleaning
b. fleet storage
C. repair,., heavy and light
d. sales and rental: heavy equipment, farm equipment, light equipment
.e. storage: nonoperating and recreational vehicles and boats
- Building maintenance services
Business equipment sales and services
- Business support services
- Communication services
- Construction sales and services
- Convenience sales and personal service (not to exceed 10% of the
total square footage within the primary use)
- Laundry services
- Research services
- Fuel sales
- Wholesale, storage and distribution
a_ mini-warehouse
b. light
- Eating and drinking establishments (not to exceed 10% of the total
square footage within the primary use)
- Participation sports and recreation
a. indoor
b_ outdoor
(not to exceed 10% of the total square footage within the primary
use)
- Professional and administrative services
(3) Industrial Use Type
- Light industrial a. Food Products b. Finished Products
c. Electronic Equipment
(4) Agricultural Use Types
- Aquaculture
- Horticulture, storage and cultivation
'Packaging & Processing: Limited
Section 1$.52.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- :ieliports
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
I
August 19, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING STAFF
Attached is an ordinance limiting consideration of applications for
Comprehensive Plan Revisions to two times a year. At their meeting of August
E. 10, 1982, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the ordinance with the
sunset clause outline in Section 2.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance amendment
attached.
pm .
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 82-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18.84.030, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, OF THE
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 18.84.030(e) is hereby added to and made a part of the
Tigard Municipal Code, to read:
18.84.020(e) - Specific Provisions Relating to Comprehensive Plan
Revisions. Applications for quasi-judicial plan revisions shall be reviewed
by the Director only during the months of April and October, except for those
applications initiated by the Commission or the Council.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect until January
1, 1984, at which time it will be null and void.
Section 3. Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health and safety
of the public that the foregoing amendment to the Tigard Municipal Code become
effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this
Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by
the Mayor.
PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present this day
of , 1982, after being read two times by number and
title only.
City Recorder -- City of Tigard
APPROVED: By the Mayor this day of , 1982.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ORDINANCE NO. 82-
(File 0287A)
1
t
MEMORANDUM 1
i
TO:
FROM: PLANNING STAFF (,
R
Attached is an ordinance limiting consideration of applications for
Comprehensive Plan Revisions to two times a year.
n y�v1�`!/� G�io�o?�Yt�/liYl
/' vy1��f .
RECOMMENDED ACTT N:
RE U wYll.1
Staff recommends that the
approve the ordinance
amendment attached.
i..
s
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 82-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18. 84 .030, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES,
OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS A3 FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 18 .84 .030 (e) is hereby added to and made a part
of the Tigard Municipal Code, to read:
18 .84.030 (e) - Specific Provisions Relating to Comprehensive
Plan Revisions . Applications for quasi-judicial plan revisions
shall be reviewed by the Director only during the months of April
and October, except for those applications initiated by the Commission
or the Council.
Section Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health and
safety of the public that the foregoing amendment to the
Tigard Municipal Code become effective immediately, an emergency is
hereby declared to exist, and this Ordinance shall be effective upon
its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor.
C' vote of all Council members present
PASSED: By 1982, after being read
thisday of
two times by number and title only.
Recorder - City of Tigard
APPROVED: By the Mayor this day of , 1982•
Mayor - City of Tigard
JX6
MAN
MAIN STREET/PACIFIC HIGHWAY - LID #37
BID OPENING: 8-23-82 - 2:30 P.M.
J.
TIGARD CITY HALL, 12755 SW ASH AVENUE, TIGARD, OREGON
BIDDER'S NAME ADDRESS BID BOND PREQUAL. BID
PO Box 4267
Cascade Const. Portland Oregon 9 208 X Addendam Added $98,308.00
21880 SW Farmington Road
Baker Rock Co. Beaverton Ore on 00 X Adden um Added 7 085.00
ity Recorder
Engineer's Estimate: $ 58,515.00
i
August 19, 1982
{
S
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
s
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Annexation Petition f
s
B
A triple majority petition has been submitted to the City for annexation of k
two lots in the Tigard Triangle area. Fred Cooper and Associates wishes to
expand their business at this location. Attached is a map, petition, legal
description and all necessary documents needed for submittal to the Boundary e
Commission. Staff recommends that Council approve the resolution to annex the
property into the City.
f
lw t
1
4
g
t
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION No. 82-
THE
A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ATTACHED. TO
(Cooper) CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A E
e
WHEREAS, "consents" in the form of a petition have been presented to the City
ion of certain tracts of land presently contiguous
of Tigard requesting annexat
t
to the corporate limits of the City; and e
f
form of a petition were signed by the owners of
WHEREAS, the consents in the Q
said tracts of land; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Council has reviewed the consents a1ad set the
final boundary for the annexation as required by ORS 119.490 (2);
WHEREAS, subsequent to the setting of the final bou,ij-ry the consents for land
contained therein represent "more than half of the owners of land in the
territory, who also own more than half of the land in the contiguous territory
and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value
of all real property in the contiguous territory;" and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation therefore is in accordance with ORS
119.490 (2) and constitutes a so-called "triple majority" annexation and a
"minor boundary change" under boundary commission law, ORS 199.410 to 199.510.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT:
E
es the
ed
Section 1= the Commissionhe Council s to approve reby vIt and effects it asnsoon las p osrequests
Section 2: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of
the statements the Resolution with Boundary Commission at oncetland
Metropolitan Area Local Government
da of 3, 1982.
APPROVED: This Y
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
t!
RESOLUTION No. 82-
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 27 through 36, Block 7 , WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, County of Washington,
State of Oregon.
A tract of land in Section 36, T1S, R1W, W.M. being lots 27 through 36, Block
7 of West Portland Heights, a subdivision of record in Washington County,
being more particularly described as follows; Beginning at the southwest
corner of lot 27, Block 7 of said West Portland Heights thence north along the
west line of lots 27 through 36 of said subdivision a distance of 250 feet to
the northwest corner of said lot 36; thence east along the north boundary of
said lot 36, 100 feet to the northeast corner thereof: PETITION SIGNERS thence
south along the east boundary of lots 36 through 27 of said subdivision 250
feet to the southeast corner of lot 27 of said subdivision; thence west along
the south line of said lot 27 a distance of 100 feet to the point of beginning.
August 18, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Division
SUBJECT: Resolution to annex Mr. Benny Larson's property to the City.
Mr. Benny .Larson has submitted a petition to annex his property to the City of
Tigard. The property is located north of S.W. 126th and Bull Mountain Road
and is contiguous to the current City limits.
Attached is a resolution, legal description, tax map and all the documents
required for submission to the Portland Metropolitan Boundary Commission.
Staff recommends Council approve the resolution to process the annexation of
Mr. Larson's property.
r
f
i
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION No. 82-
l i
A RESOLUTION FURTHERING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED.
S
's
WHEREAS, "consents" in the form of a petition have been presented to the City
of Tigard requesring annexation of certain tracts of land presently contiguous
to the corporate limits of the city; and s
WHEREAS, the consents in the form of a petition were signed by the owners of f
said tracts of land; and
r
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard Council has reviewed the consents and set the
final boundary for the annexation as required by ORS 199.490(2); and
i
V4.EREAS, subsequent to the setting of the final boundary the consents for land
contained therein represent "more than half of the owners of land in the
territory, who also own more than half of the land in the contiguous territory
and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value
of all real property in the contiguous territory;" and
i
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation therefore is in accordance with ORS
199.490(2) and constitutes a so-called "triple majority" annexation and a
"minor boundary change" under boundary commission law, ORS 199.410 to 199.510.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD a
municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, at a regular session held on the
day of , 1982, that:
Section 1. The Council hereby approves the proposed annexation and requests
the Commission to approve it and effect it as soon as possible.
Section 2. The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of
the statements of consent and of the Resolution with the Portland
Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission at once.
4
APPROVED: This day of , 1982•
i
Mayor - City of Tigard
i
ATTEST:
l
City Recorder - City of Tigard �.
�� RESOLUTION No. 82-
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Beginning at a point on the East line of Section nine (9), Township two (2)
South, Range one (1) West, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon, 1,143.45 feet
South from the northeast corner of said section; running thence West 660.00
feet; thence South 78.00 feet, more or less; thence East 63.00 feet; thence
South 34.7 feet; thence East 597.00 feet to the East line of said section;
thence North along said section line 112.7 feet, more or less, to the place of
beginning.
I
- i
f
i
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
August 18, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Division
SUBJECT: Administrative Procedures - Section 18.84 of the Zoning Code.
Since February of this year, the Planning Division has been operating under a
new set of Administrative Procedures for processing Land Use and Development
applications for the City. For the most part, the new Administrative
Procedures ordinance has streamlined the application process considerably.
However, staff is c()ncerned about the time involved in processing applications
submitted for a decision by the Planning Director. The staff has had numerous
complaints from applicants that the Site Design Review process takes too much
time and some applicants have been discouraged from pursuing development plans
because of the time involved in obtaining a decision from the Planning
Director.
Under the Administrative Procedures section of the code, any application
submitted to the Planning Director requires notice as follows:
Section 18.84.070 Notice
(a) Decisions by the Director.
1. Notice of a proposed action on a development application pursuant to
Section 18.84.050(a) shall be given by the Director in the following
manner:
(A) At least twenty (20) days prior to the date of final decision
set forth in the notice, notice shall be sent by mail to:
1. The applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of
record of the property which is the subject of the
application;
2. All owners of record of property within one hundred (100)
feet of the property;
3. The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization, if active;
4. Any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an
intergovernmental agreement entered into with the city which
includes provision for such notice;
ERA
Administrative Procedures
Memo
Page 2
5. Any person who requests, in writing, and pays a fee
established by the Council.
The Director shall cause an affidavit of mailing of notice to be
filed and made a part of the administrative record.
(B) A notice published once in a newspaper of general circulation in
the city at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of final
decision set forth in the notice. An affidavit of publication
shall be made part of the administrative record.
In addition, there is a fifteen day appeal period which starts the day the
final decision is filed as provided for in Section 18.84.240;
Section 18.84.24 0 The Effective Date of the Decision - Appeal or Review
(a) Any decision made under the provision of this chapter shall become
effective on the fifteenth day from the date notice of the final
decision is given, as provided in Section 18.84.130 of this chapter,
unless an appeal or review is taken pursuant to Section 18.84.250 of
this chapter.
The process for Site Design Review and Minor Land Partitions takes at least 35
days and that does not includes delays in setting up the file or getting the
public notice out or staff time to prepare the written recommendation to the
Planning Director for his decision.
Staff would like to recommend that the 20 day notice period be reduced to 10
days and the 15 day appeal period be reduced to 10 days for decisions make by
the Director.
In addition, a large Lumber of the applications submitted for Site Design
Review are small remodelo to existing buildings. Many of these applications
are time consuming for both staff and the applicant. Often, applicants are
discouraged by the amount of time involved in processing the application and
often the public notice mailed on these types of applications generate no
response. Usually the application proposals meet all zoning code requirements
in terms of setbacks, building height, landscaping requirements, parking
requirements and use types. Staff feels that in order to avoid discouraging
existing businesses from expanding, limited remodeling to existing businesses
should be allowed without subjecting the applicant to G-e lengthy design
review procedure. Any remodel or addition of less than 25% of the existing
building floor area should be allowed under an administrative review
procedure. This procedure would require the Planning Director or his designee
to review the plans submitted to the building department for all zoning code
requirements and stamp as approved the site plan prior to issuance of the
Building Perm-*,-'--. A notice of decision would go out to surrounding property
owners within 100 feet of the property on applications for additions only.
The surrounding property owners would have seven (7) days to appeal the
Planning Director's approval.
Administrative Prccedures
Memo
Page 3
The procedure suggested here should further streamline our administrative
process and encourage business expansion in the City. Further, it will cut
down on the number of Site Design Review applications which will save staff
time and mailing and advertising costs.
1 `
CITYOFT147AIW
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
August 13 , 1982
MR. DAYTON PAGE,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
WASHINGTON COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
P.O. BOX 988
HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123
SUBJECT: CITY OF TIGARD HOUSING POLICY AND AGREEMENT
WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
Dear Dayton:
As I indicated to you at our meeting last month, I did meet
with the residents of Grant Court in Tigard. I reassured them
f of your intent to reseed and fence your existing unit in that
neighborhood this Fall . I informed them of your agency' s
policy as to maintaining an attractive appearance (e.g. , no
disassembled trucks in drives, mowed lawns, etc. ) . These
concerns over the appearance of the neighborhood appear to be
satisfied.
Concern remains , however, over the plan to place three more
units in this same neighborhood. The placement of four total
units in a ten unit subdivision appears to be an "undue
concentration" , specifically prohibited by the City' s
Comprehensive Plan, Housing Plan and our Agreement with the
Authority. I would like to discuss this issue with you and
the Board as you suggested at the noon, August 24, 1982, meeting.
I am sure that we can resolve this concern and proceed in a
rational manner towards implementing our mutual housing goals.
I thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Yours truly,
CITY OF TIGARD
to
Robert Jean,
City inistrator
RWJ : dkr
CC : Mayor Bishop and City Council —Bill Monahan, Planning -Directo
11111 1, P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171
MAGNUM SECURITY 'INC.
3835 NE HANCOCK v
SUITE 201
PORTLAND, OREGON 97212
`- (503) 249-0551
June 11, 1982
Tigard Police Department
9020 S.W. 'Burnham
' Tigard. Oregon 97223
Dear Detective Moers:
We appreciate the time and effort which was expended on getting Magnum
Security Inc. and our employees license to operate within the City of Tigard
on such short notice.
We met our obligations and preformed our services without any problems
What -so' ever. We`re looking forward to doing more business in Tigard. _
Once again thank you for your time and efforts in assisting us.
Very truly yours,
Karl E. ns ,
President-
e �
EXTENSION SE�iVICEe n HIM.
Washington County
9�1 University
Mrs. Sheila Vertrees
Trail Chairman
Rt. 1, Box 173—C
Cornelius, Oregon 97113
August 10, 1982
Tigard City Police Pept.
9020 S.W. Burnham St.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Atten:L Chief Adams:
The Breakaway 182 Wagon Train Board and all of the pioneers wish to thank you
and your department for the excellent assistance in traffic control. The
Wagon Train was a big successt
I wish to personally thank you and your department for assisting me as Trail
Chai.rma6 in helping to keep the train moving smoothly along. Thanks again!
Sincerely,
'e
v
(Mrs.) Sheila Vertregs
Trail Chairman
01WALK SOFTLY ON THE IaWD, TAKE ONLY PICTURES, LEAVE ONLY FOOTPRINTSD1
s
L
+.s
J
f
e
' WASHINGTON COUNTY
a
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING — 146 N. E. LINCOLN
HILLSBORO, OREGON 47123
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DEPT.OF PUBLIC SAFETY
VIRGINIA DAGG,Chairman WARREN(BUD)BARNES,Sheriff
(503)648-8894
LYELL GARDNER,Vice Chairman
JIM FISHER
BONNIE L. HAYS
LUCILLE WARREN
August 12, 1982
Tigard Mayor Wilbur Bishop
12420 S.W. Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mayor Bishop:
On September 15 - 16, 1982, the Washington County Department of
Public Safety is hosting a two (2) day community meeting with the
National Institute of Corrections. This meeting is to assess the
present and future needs of corrections in Washington County.
The major stakeholders need to be present and involved from the
beginning.
Please check your calendar and advise if you will be able to
attend. Your attendance and participation is needed to assure
your concerns are met by the planning process.
At this time the PGE Building, located at 14655 SW Old Scholls
Ferry Road in Beaverton has been reserved for the meeting. It
will be held on the 15th from 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM and on the 16th
from 10:30 AM to 4:30 PM. Coffee and doughnuts will be provided.
Thank you for your interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
Warren B. Barnes
Sherriff
WBB:pc:lk
an equal opportunity employer
Ln
N
Cd 6Y+
{1a Fa x
cl1
� x
H
H �
U ca b0
Ir
M ,� 4-1 O
N d -1
N co
cn
d
co
ro
OO =1
P4 Cp
i
1 � i
U2
V1
Q.'
ON p' cti r+ N PC C13M
w� hW
'� pq NZW Pi t0 z
H
J "'J
W04 CO O O W P' c0
c�tt e. C�h'x H coHN L7 x H
(� P. x azu 0 x Pax PazU
M a �o T Pd ~ :>, o >% oC4;2 =
41 O <C pA p U 4-+ M u C> -4
L14— $4
nU nxlR::DeA UU nU 9xP�+ A
OO Vl N O% •-�
N N Rf N
cn
O
-4 .'Z. H z W z rr z. N
w a x '"I w x a x
CO3
n. U f� U i� H f� U cri
1� U V]
n �U -4N z U O
LU
C>1-4
.2� U U ~ v
L a 0 P
44 t
0 3 3 � .0 41 co A
% Ic is -k• Qc do n -9 ^k N U 10 iJ
cd f+
04 ' C> rn
H rM1 P'a N E N Pi
a W U Ucts
U F+ H O O
V ra A H r-7 U ce+ U
S-4
CIS —4
H m z w $4 w H w I4 $4
C) v. Ca
oO °3 0 .� o r-4H O I:p
CM p M O M
U z r- W - 4
x
Ln �
N
E.
r��