City Council Packet - 07/12/1982 . Y
TIGAkD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA on an agenda item needs to sign their
JULY 12, 198'L, 7:30 P.M. name on the appropriate sign-up
^OWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL sheet(s). If no sheet is provided,
ask to be recognized by the Chair.
„ECTURE ROOM
1. REGULAR MEETING:
1.1 Cali To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call to Staff, Council and Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda
2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one
motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed for
discussion and separate action. Motion to:
2.1 Approve the Expenditures and Investments: $ 152,973.81
2.2 Approve and Authorize Necessary Signatures:
• Sewer Easement - Hoodview LID - Richard & Marjorie Quarles
• Street Dedication - Heinicke Instruments Company, corner of Greenburg &
Cascade
of�.yc.._.. Ease=ent - Tarry & Willodean Crane - SW McDonald Street F
• Ye r�uaitc iii �i -
• McKenzie Street (Street) LID - Agreement for Engineering Services - Martin
Engineering Co.
2.3 Approve Resolution No. 82-61 Ratifying Planning Commission Appointments made
7-6-82
2.4 Approve Resolution No. 82-62 Ratifying Library Board Appointments made 7-6-82
2.5 Ratify Planning Commission Approval of NPO #5 Appointments
2.6 Canvass Votes From June 29, 1982 Special Election - TCYS & Civic Center Measures
2.7 Receive and File Written Communications: i
• Memo from Tigard Christian Church Re: Driveway Accessibility.
• Letter from Summerfield Board of Directors Re: Durham Road.
0
• Letter from Wade Peterson Re: Public Officials Caucus Notice.
• Memo from Staff Re: Astro Sports - Canterbury Square.
2.8 Approve Resolution No. 82-63 Re: 72nd Avenue LID Condemnation Pioceedings
2.9 Approve Resolution No. 82-64 Re: Set Public Hearing for 8-9-82 - Street
Vacation Request for Pac Trust/72nd Avenue LID
2.10 Approve Resolution No. '02-65 Re: Set Public Hearing for 8-9-82 - Street
Vacation Request for Bingham Investment/72nd Avenue LID
2.11 Approve Resolution No. 82-66 Re: Set Public Hearing for 8-9-82 - Street
Vacation Request for Forest H. Tower/72nd Avenue LID t
2.12 Approve Resoluticr. :Ic. 82-67 Re: Set Public Hearing for 8-9-82 - Street
Vacation Request for Pacific Western Bank/72nd Avenue LID
3. SOLID WASTE RATE INCREASE REQUESTS
• Presentation by Franchised Haulers
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 3-82 (Durham Island) NPO #5 & #6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 238.64 acres located
nei^lly north of Durham, west of 74th, south of Bonita and east of Hall Blvd. from
wash4ngton County RU-4 and MA-1 to City of Tigard zoning.
® Public Hearing Opened
• Summation by Planning Director
• Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Planning Director
• Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council
• Ordinance No. 82- Adopting Zone Change
J �� X1.'1 N,{✓�c"
Vl �L�✓/L
ZONE CHANGE ZCA 4-82 (Alderbrook Isla4j NPO 6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 110.5 acres located between
109th and 96th and between Kable Street and Murdock Street, from Washington County
RU-4 to City of Tigard zoning.
• Public Hearing Opened ✓
o Summation by Planning Director,""
• Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination`
• Recommendation by Planning Director-
Public Hearing Closed"
o Consideration by Council
/ • Ordinance No. 82- :j b' Adopting Zone Change
ZONE CHANGE ZCA 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation) NPO #3
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on property located generally
west of 121st and north of Gaarde Street from Washington County to City of Tigard
zoning. % ?I 6 z7 v
• Public Hearing Opened
e Summation by Planning Director
s Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Recommendation by Planning Director
• Public Hearing Closed
e Consideration by Council
• Ordinance No. 82- Adopting Zone Change
f!. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 7-82 (North Dakota Annexation) NPO #2 & #7
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 180 acres located generally
( - east of 115th Avenue, west of Greenburg Road, north of Tigard Street, and south of
North Dakota Street from Washington County to City of Tigard zoning.
o Public Hearing Opened -�+w-
o Summation by Planning Direct
• Public Testimony: Proponentso Opponents, Cross Examination
• Recommendation by Planning Director
a Public Hearing Closed
6 Consideration by Council
o Ordinance No. 82- Adopting Zone Change
Z. 74TH AVENUE LID STREET PUBLIC HEARING
o Public Hearing Opened
o Summation by Director of Public Works ✓
• Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination :/
• Recommendation by Director of Public Works,✓
• Public Hearing Closed
• Consideration by Council
/. McKENZIE/ST. ANTHONY'S STREET LID PUBLIC HEARING
o Public Hearing Opened.
-
0 Summation by Director of Public Works
• Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination
o Recommendation by Director of Public Works C r
o Public Hearing Closed f
o Consideration by Council a
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONCLUDED
i
i
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 14, 1982 ;
G l_Iq�,�
�. SOLUTION No. 82-')"\ Police Goals & Response Priority
♦ Chief of Police
11. SOLUTION No. 82- r -' Personnel Policies
♦ Administrative Assistant Sargent
12. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item
1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City -
Administrator prior to the meeting.
13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into executive session under ORS
192.660 (1) .(f) relating to pending litigation.
14. ADJOURNMENT
-7,;2 � �� /6 ;
7
TT-
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 14, 1982
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian, John
Cook, Kenneth Scheckla (arriving at 7:36 P.M.), Nancie
Stimler; Chief of Police, Robert Adams (leaving at 11:30
P.M.); Director of Public Works/Planning Director, Frank
Currie; Finance Director/City Recorder, Doris Hartig;
City Administrator, Bob Jean; Legal Counsel, Ed Sullivan;
Office Manager, Loreen Wilson.
2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL AND AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN
AGENDA.
(a) City Administrator reported that Associate Planner Coursolle was
present to give a brief update on the Comp Plan status before
the other agenda items were discussed.
COUNCILOR SCHECKLA ARRIVED: 7:36 P.M.
(b) City Administrator requested the following items be considered
under Open Agenda.
.1 Tony Maksym - 72nd Avenue LID Discussion
.2 Approve 72nd Avenue Contract Payments
.3 Town & Country Days Report
.4 Redwood Trees Along 72nd Avenue Report
.5 Budget Committee Meeting Date
.6 Astro Sports item from Consent Agenda
.7 Safety Issue
.8 Civic Center Committee
Administrator also requested that Acquisition of Real Property
be considered under Executive Session per ORS 192.660 (1)(e).
(c) Councilor Stimler questioned why minutes from previous meetings
were not available for approval by Council.
City Administrator reported that work backlog was making it
difficult to keep minutes up to date. Staff will be trying to
forward some minutes in the next packet.
Councilor Stimler also expressed concern regarding the due date
of monthly reports and requested that they be placed in the
Council packets on a consistent basis, the third Monday of each
month.
3. COMP PLAN UPDATE
(a) Associate Planner Coursolle reported briefly on the progress of
the Comp Plan process and noted there will be a joint meeting
with Council, the Planning Commission and NPO Chairmen on August
10, 1982 to discuss the process and surrounding issues.
(b) City Administrator stated that during the last few months staff
has received various requests to redraft or change the text on
maps of the existing NPO plans. He recommended Council wait
until after the Comp Plan is adopted through the LCDC process
before additional map changes be accomplished.
Consensus of Council was to do any modifications after the CoM2
Plan adoption.
4. APPROVE THE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $152,973.81
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
5. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE NECESSARY SIGNATURES:
• Sewer Easement - Hoodview LID - Richard & Marjorie Quarles
• Street Dedication - Heinicke Instruments Company, corner of
Greenburg and Cascade
• Permanent Slope Easement - Terry & Willodean Crane - SW McDonald
Street
• McKenzie Street (Street) LID - Agreement for Engineering
Services - Martin Engineering Co.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
and authorize necessary signatures.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
6. RESOLUTION No. 82-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING
E
APPOINTMENTS TO THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION.
(a) Following people to be appointed:
Frank Tepedino - term expires 6-30-86
Cliff Speaker - term expires 6-30-86
Bonnie Owens - term expires 6-30-86
Phil Edin - term expires 6-30-85
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to appoint
Planning Commissioners.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
7. RESOLUTION No. 82-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING
APPOINTMENTS TO THE TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD.
(a) Appointments to be made as follows:
Walt Munhall - term expires 6-30-86
Susan Mueller - term expires 6-30-86
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to appoint
Library Board Members.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
8. RATIFY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF NPO 05 APPOINTMENTS
(a) Following persons were approved by Planning Commission to be
appointed as NPO #5 Members.
Debra Naubert
Sharon Takahashi
Chris Vanderwood
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
appointments made by Planning Commission.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9. CANVASS VOTE FROM JUNE 29, 1982 SPECIAL ELECTION - TCYS & CIVIC
CENTER MEASURES.
(a) TCYS: Yes 885, No 908
Civic Center Bond Measure: Yes 690, No 1100
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to canvass
the vote from the 6-29-82 election as set forth in the record.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
10. RECEIVE AND FILE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
Y Memo from Tigard Christian Church re: Driveway Accessibility
m Letter from Summerfield Board of Directors re: Durham Road
® Letter from Wade Peterson re: Public Officials Caucus Notice
s Memo from Staff re: Astro Sports - Canterbury Square
C (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive
and file all communications except for the memo regarding Astro
Sports which should be placed on Open Agenda.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
11. RESOLUTION No. 82-68 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND [
PURPOSE FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN
RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR 72ND AVENUE AREA LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, DIRECTING AN ATTEMPT TO
AGREE WITH OWNERS AS TO COMPENSATION; 4
THEREFORE AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS
TO ACQUIRE SAID RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
12. RESOLUTION No. 82-69 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND
PURPOSE FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN
RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR 72ND AVENUE AREA LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, DIRECTING AN ATTEMPT TO
AGREE WITH OWNERS AS TO COMPENSATION; THEREFORE
r
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO
ACQUIRE SAID RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
13. RESOLUTION No. 82-70 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF A PORTION
OF SW 72ND AVENUE, A 60 FOOT WIDE DEDICATED
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. (PacTrust)
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
with amended public hearing date of August 23, 1982.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
14. RESOLUTION No. 82-71 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF PORTIONS
OF SW 72ND AVENUE, A DEDICATED PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, OREGON. (Bingham Investment)
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
with amended public hearing date of August 23, 1982.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
15. RESOLUTION No. 82-72 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF PORTIONS
OF SW 72ND AVENUE AND CARMEN DRIVE, A
DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF
( TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
with amended public hearing date of August 23, 1982.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
16. RESOLUTION No. 82-73 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF A PORTION
OF SW 72ND AVENUE, A DEDICATED PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON
COUNTY, OREGON.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve
with amended public hearing date of August 23, 1982.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
17. SOLID WASTE RATE INCREASE REQUESTS
(a) Mr. Carl Miller, President of Miller's Sanitary Service, Inc. ,
presented historical information for Council consideration on
increase of costs experienced by his company since the last rate
increase was received.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
(b) Mr. Herbert Frank, President of Frank's Disposal Service, Inc. ,
also presented cost information on operations of his business.
(c) Mr. Larry Schmidt, Vice-President of Schmidt Sanitary Service,
Inc. , stated he had experienced the same type of increases and
would be requesting consideration of a rate increase also.
(d) City Administrator stated that staff would be working with the
franchise haulers and would present to Council the request by
August 23 or September 13.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
18. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 3-82 (Durham Island) NPO #5 & #6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 238.64 acres
located generally north of Durham, west of 74th, south of Bonita and
east of Hall Blvd. from Washington County RU-4 and MA-1 to City of
Tigard zoning.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
l
(b) Associate Planner Newton gave summation of property annexed and
stated this hearing was to change the zoning from Washington
County to City of Tigard.
(c) PUBLIC TESTIMONY i
• John Swartz, resident of the area, expressed concern regarding
the county zoning designation and city zoning designation being
used for his property. He questioned how many units per acre
i
Cwould be allowed. €
• John Arrigoni, NPO #6 Member, stated that R-5 would be a E
downzoning in this area and stated it was not consistent with
the current use. He also advised Council that NPO #6 minutes �
stated the NPO was opposing any R-5 in the area. `.
• Anne Leiser, 6009 SW Pendleton Ct. Portland, 97221, expressed E
disfavor with the annexation of her property and stated she had
never been notified of the proposed annexation.
After some further discussion, Ms. Leiser stated she would
approve R-5 zoning on her property, not R-7 as proposed.
• Robert Aungier, 11302 SW Barbur, appeared representing his son
and stated he opposed the annexation of the property without
notice to the property owners and does not see need to be
downzoned from MA-1 to M-4.
• Associate Planner Newton advised Council that the County and
City industrial zones were not comparable and the NPO plan for
this area shows M-4 as the Comp Plan designation. `
i
e Lengthy discussion followed regarding the advertising f
r requirements for zoning hearings and annexations.
l
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
• Councilor Scheckla requested staff check land fill which is
occurring in the floodplain on Durham and 74th. He felt this
should be discussed before any action takes place on the zone
change before Council.
e Councilor Stimler noted reasons why area had been annexed
stating that the County has refused to supply services in that
area since it was within the Urban Growth Boundary of Tigard.
(d) Planning Director recommended making the changes as advertised
and then come back at a later date with a Comprehensive Plan
Revision or to continue the hearing until i-25-82 to give staff
a chance to study the surrounding issues further.
• Councilor Scheckla requested staff supply a map for properties
surrounding 74th Avenue, noting especially those areas in the
floodplain.
(e) Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Brian to
continue the public hearing until 7-26-82 at 7:30 P.M.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
19. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 4-82 (Alderbrook Island) NPO #6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 110.5 acres
located between 109th and 96th and between Kable Street and Murdock
Street, from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard zoning.
(a), Public Hearing Opened
(b) Associate Planner Newton synopsized history of issue and noted
City was requesting zone changed from Washington County
designation to City of Tigard designation.
(c) Marge Davenport, NPO #6 Member, submitted a resolution from NPO
#6 stating they wanted the zoning to preserve the character of
the area and not be downzoned.
(d) Planning Director recommended approval as submitted since the
zoning request does preserve the existing character of the area.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) ORDINANCE No. 82-35 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONE OF LANDS
ANNEXED BY THE BOUNDARY COMMISSION, ORDER No.
1819, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN
AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF TIGARD TO CONFORM WITH THE NPO #6 PLAN AS
ADOPTED AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(g) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to
adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
C
PAGE 6 -- COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
20. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation) NPO #3
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on property
located generally west of 121st and north of Gaarde Street from
Washington County to City of Tigard zoning.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Associate Planner Newton stated that staff had originally
recommended changing the zone to come into conformance with the
Comp Plan Map used by Planning Department. She noted that there
seems to be a two-fold problem now, there is no definition for
suburban-low density on the NPO #3 Plan and the Comp Plan Text
is inconsistent with the Map.
(c) Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, NPO #3 Member, gave lengthy
history of zone changes and Plan amendments for the NPO #3
area. He stated that the Map used in the Planning Department
does not seem to be consistent with the Comp Plans as adopted by
ordinance.
He recommended the zone change be to R-10 and R-20 or 30.
s LouAne Mortensen, 11160 SW Fonner, NPO #3 Chairman, asked
Council to take into consideration the events which occurred in
Ames Orchard Subdivision and offered her support of the material
submitted by Mr. Bledsoe. 11
(d) Mr. Bledsoe asked the City Attorney to give an opinion as to i
whether the facts, as he presented, were correct and if the City
could change the zone if the Comp Plan Map and Text were in E
( conflict.
s
(e) Legal Counsel explained that he did not have the files before
him, however, if the facts existed as Mr. Bledsoe presented, it
would seem that a Comprehensive Plan Revision would be more
appropriate than a zone change. Legal Counsel recommended
s
continuing the hearing until 7-26-82 at 7:30 P.M. to give staff
time to study the issues. i
i
® Councilor Brian mentioned that Council has changed some Comp
Plan designations within the last two years and asked that Staff
check that information also.
(f) City Administrator stated staff would try to recreate the record
and process and report back at the next meeting.
(g) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to
continue the public hearing until 7-26-82 at 7:30 P.M.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
21. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 7-82 (North Dakota Annexation) NPO #2 & #7
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 180 acres
located generally east of 115th Avenue, west of Greenburg Road, north
of Tigard Street, and south of North Dakota Street from Washington
County to City of Tigard zoning.
i
PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - j ULY 12, 1982
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Associate Planner Newton noted zoning designations as reported
on Planning Department map.
(c) Public Testimony:
s John Skourtes, 17010 SW Weir Road Beaverton, stated his parcel
is too small to be zoned M-4 and requested different zoning be
considered for that land.
® Bruce Clark, R.A. Gray & Company, 11450 SW Tiedeman, stated that
the land use has been storage for the last 15 years and some of
it is in the floodplain. He suggested M-2 or M-3 zoning,
instead of the proposed M-4, would be more appropriate.
o Art Pascuzzi, 10795 SW Cascade, stated he was against M-4 zone
designations being placed on the property in the area and
suggested M-2 would be more appropriate.
® Mayor Bishop stated he supported the requests presented.
® Bill Wright, 10795 & 10831 SW Cascade Avenue, doesn't want M-4
zoning, and requested M-3 would be best.
(d) City Administrator suggested that the issue here is what the
Comp Plan designation is and suggested that Council continue the
public hearing until staff can determine that issue.
(e) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Cook to
continue the public hearing until July 26, 1982 at 7:30 P.M.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
RECESS: 10:17 P.M.
RECONVENE: 10:39 P.M.
22. 74TH AVENUE LID STREET PUBLIC HEARING
(a) Public Hearing Opened.
(b) Director of Public Works stated this issue had been readvertised
for consideration at this meeting. The street is proposed to be
developed to 24' and the assessment will be based on area with
1/2 area in the floodplain on corner lots.
(c) Public Testimony:
s John Skourtes, property owner, stated he agreed with staff's
proposal and requested the ordinance read "the total cost not to
exceed $95,000".
e Discussion followed regarding what options would be left open to
Council if the bids were higher than $95,000. Director of
C
PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
Public Works recommended Council word the ordinance as it was
presented noted the "assessable cost" not "total cost" so as to
leave as many options open as possible.
® Geoff Leaver, Pudget Corporation, 7440 SW Bonita Road, supported
the proposal.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval of the project.
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to
direct staff to prepare an ordinance for the July 26, 1982
meeting noting the "assessable cost not to exceed $95,000".
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(g) Staff recommended that if Montgomery Engineers did not want to
continue the project at this time, City staff could do the
engineering at a reduced cost. Director of Public Works will
examine contract with Engineers to see if this is possible.
23. McKENZIE/ST. ANTHONY'S STREET LID PUBLIC HEARING
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Director of Public Works stated that due to a condition placed
on St. Anthony's during a zoning process, there was a petition
generated to request the LID on McKenzie Street for street
improvements. This would be from Pacific Highway to Grant f
Street and Martin Engineering would do the engineering of the
project at the request of the church. The LID was figured on a
front foot basis at a total cost of $56,312.70.
Director of Public Works advised Council that the project is
proposed for a 28' wide one-way street with parking on each side
and a restricted entrance from Pacific Highway to about 20' for
safety purposes.
Discussion followed regarding the parking arrangement along the
street.
Mayor Bishop stated the State Highway Department should be
contacted regarding this development. Director of Public Works
stated that was the City's normal procedure after the Council
declared where the LID project would be placed.
(c) Public Testimony: i
e Dennis Henninger, St. Anthony's representative, urged diagonal =
parking and requested support of the LID. f
® Floyd Bergmann, owner of Floyd's Restaurant, requested approval t
of diagonal parking as it would seem safer. He also mentioned
E
PAGE 9 — COUNCIL MINUTES — JULY 12, 1982
to pay for asphalt overlay for
that it seems unfair that he has
the whole street when the developments on the other side of the
street were not required to finish that side.
• Director of Public Works stated that on half street
improvements, the developer is only required to improve 1" below
the street level so that during an overlay project the whole
street can be improved at the same time. He stated it was the
City's policy in the past to pick up that cost during the
overlay project time.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended Council direct staff to
come back on the 26th with an ordinance to form the LID with 28'
street width with diagonal parking and 5' sidewalks, or where 5'
is not available, appropriate sidewalk widths. He stated if
Council wishes not to charge overlay costs for the half street
on the opposite side of McKenzie that they could direct staff to
do at the time the LID is being completed from City overlay
funds.
(e) Public Hearing Closed d r
(f) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to SPC,
have staff prepare ordinance per Director of Public Works'
recommendation for the 7-26-82 meeting. u / "`t
Y1
(g) Further discussion occurred on the question of diagonal vs
parallel parking. Consensus of Council was to have staff place
diagonal parking along McKenzie Street unless the State Highway
Department doesn't approve. Then staff should place parallel
parking along the street. [
F
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING WAS CONCLUDED f
f
24. RESOLUTION No. 82-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTING A POLICE MISSION STATEMENT AND
GENERAL GOAL STATEMENTS AS WELL AS ADDRESSING
PRIORITIES FOR DISCRETIONARY SERVICES.
(a) City Administrator recommended approval per Council's previous
action and recommended the word "discretionary" in the first
line of Section 3 be removed to make the ordinance more
accurately reflect the type of priorities adopted.
I
(b) Councilor Stimler requested the typographical error in Section f
2, subsection 4 be corrected.
(c) Councilor Brian expressed his appreciation for the criminal and t
traffic priorities being set out in the resolution as well as
discretionary call priorities. j
f
i
(d) Chief of Police expressed his appreciation to the Council for
the direction given by the resolution for the Police Department.
F
f
F
E
PAGE 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
(e) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to
approve as amended.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
CHIEF OF POLICE LEFT - 11:30 P.M.
25. RESOLUTION No. 82-75 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PERSONNEL POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD.
(a) City Administrator recommended approval of the resolution so
that there is more explicit direction in the Personnel Manual
regarding overtime worked by unclassified personnel and military
leave.
(b) Discussion followed regarding the method of comp time accrual
now used for unclassified personnel.
(c) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to
approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
26. OPEN AGENDA
26.1 Tony Maksym - 72nd Avenue LID Discussion
Mr. Tony Maksym, property owner in the 72nd Avenue LID area,
presented Council with various questions regarding the LID.
(See attached list of questions presented verbally.)
After lengthy discussion on some of the questions, consensus of
Council was that the issues should be discussed at a future
meeting when staff has had time to prepare a response.
26.2 Due to the lateness of the hour, City Administrator stated the
following items would be discussed at the Council meeting of
7-13-82.
• Approve 72nd Avenue Contract Payments
• Town & Country Days Report
• Redwood Trees Along 72nd Avenue Report
• Budget Committee Meeting Date
• Astro Sports item from Consent Agenda
• Safety Issue
• Civic Center Committee
27. ADJOURNMENT OF REGULAR MEETING 12:00 Midnight
28. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into executive
session under ORS 192.660 (1) (f) relating to pending litigation and
ORS 192.660 (1) (e) relating to acquisition of real property.
29. ADJOURNMENT OF EXECUTIVE SES ON 12:22 P.M.
Doris Hartig, City R der
ATTEST:
Wilbur Bishop, Mayor
PAGE 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 12, 1982
.!
CITY OF TIG Ahu
G)uestiors Asked of the City Council by An-thong J . V11k-sym
� . Has the Council read the documents sent to the property owners
involved in the 72nd I, .I .D . ?
2 . Did the Coun6il direct the language and content of the docu-
ments?
3 . Is the Council aware of the implications of the Bancroft and
city deferal documents , specifically the language which
states that the property is benefited and the paragraph that
wants the property owner' to foreclose his legal rights?
4. In order to get a Bancroft loan, is it legally necessary .for
the property owners to admit a benefit when there isn 't one
and then surrender his legal rights to boot?
5.._ Does the City have the legal right to require us to sign- a
blank check on their assessments? We are not told the total
amount op, the interest rate . Also, to the best of my reco-
llection the interest rate for 10 and twenty year bonds was
to be explained, discussed, and then decided on?
6. Is the Council aware of the 7% interest rate the City is
reaui_ring on top of the Bancroft bond rates for the residen-
tial deferments; bringing the deferred rate to approrimently
19% and asking that this interest be paid semi-a.nually? Is
this the Council' s way of helping; the residential property
owners?
7. Is the city going to negotiate to buy some equal properties
for unequal prices. In other words, pay less for similar
properties?
8. Was the hundreds of tons of gravel and asphalt which will be
used to cover the 36 inch water line being inserted in 72nd
street considered in the cost of improving 72nd street?
9. At other Council meetings I 've heard it said that some money
i
was paid to the state for its improvement of 72nd street past
the new interchange . I would like to have that clarified .
10. Did Washington County, at the time it turned over 72nd street
to the City, promise or provide the City with funds for the
future improvement of the road? If not, why not?
11 . How are the priorities established on roads for money sent -to the
City from the state or the county for road repair?
-4(_
{
S
i
Ce P
ac
�� It
=
a AV
a=o
"CE,
w ;
eta S s7 rs r c� to.��r-
d as o
1 -
'Lf y
ev'a o y v
( " u
of O
v c
m
cc I0
CD
to
00
a
y J
r
bb
Qi a E a
o Q,
LL
ca 3 3
h cti ze a c
w
� E a `a o •o �. N• .n.
93
' ): 'd b
06
W C
3 �
cL .
W F s cZI ` o
Date duly 12, 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City
�^ Council on the following item:
(Please print your name)
AGENDA ITEM 1.3
1.3 CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL AND AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA
Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description
c. n/Po
r
Date July 1" 1982
wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
e \ the following item: (Please print your name)
O
Item Description: ZONE CHANGE ZCA 3-82
(DURHAM ISLAND) NPO #5 & #6
AGENDA TTFM 1 4
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
game, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
I
1
I
1
Da to j iSLY 12 1982
• o-
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
t
d
Item Description: ZONE CHANGE ZCA 4-82
(ALDERBROOK ISLAND) NPO X66
AGEMMA ITEM 4ri
t'rcponent (for) Opponent (against)
Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
i
11 INS Iffil IN
l/
O_
'r
i
r
Date JULY 12, 1982
i
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on {
l the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: ZONE CHANGE ZCA 5-82
(BECHTOLD ANNEXATION) NPO #3
i
A[`FNnA T'PFM f,
(against)
Proponent (for) Opponent --• - - !
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
ic
f�
Date JULY _2 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: ZONE CHANGE ZCA 7082
(NORTH DAKOTA ANNEXATION) NPO #2 & #7
AGENDA ITEM # ? --
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation � Name, Address and Affiliation
32vcE Z.�. - 0-AL a ✓ %
0,t i `� 6� 62o S- 31`-8
r
C
Date JULY 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: 74TH AVENUE LID STREET PUBLIC HEARING
1
Proponent (for) Opponent (against)
Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
t
Da to
JULY 12 1982
E I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
Item Description: McKENZIE/ST. ANTHONY'S STREET LID
PUBLIC HEARING
AGE-KnA TTFM f
_roponent (for) I=Opponent (against)
ame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
a 7
�v F^ 1 i c f • 441 n iI
C =
fy f3 , r? A A A
72 /a a o Yo �10
9955 :5uj 6-7
ix
X870 7'-
ke
z LZI
YNI
Yl�
MINIMUM MIMMI minim M�
i
i
- p — �- 3 O dO
v2jA
rY
7o — -7 oCL11.1 CL
_- --- -- -- -- -
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
PROGRAM BUDGET JUNE 30, 1982
Community Protection
Police 8,393.35
Public Works 3,384.39
Municipal Court 233.43
i Planning 1,517.45
i
j Building 698.75
Total Community Protection 14,227.37
,
Home & Com.auni ty Quality
Public Works 42,044.83
Social Services
Library 3,852.04
Aged Services
Youth Services
Historical
Total Social Services 3,852.04
Policy & Administration
Mayor & Council 896.07
` Administration 1 ,824.22
l Finance 2,349.40
Total Policy & Administration 5,069.69
City Wide Support Functions
Non-departmental 2, 176.56
Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 29,298.08
CAPITOL BUDGET
Community Protections
Road Acquisition & Dev. 23,894.73
Parks Acquisition & Dev.
Storm Drainage
Total Community Protection 23,894.73
Support Services
Building Improvements
DEBT SERVICE
General Obligation Bond
Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses 2,090.38
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Contract 30,320. 13
152,973.81
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN
ACREF1,1E1.T FOP
E_`G'I := ERIi4;G SERVICES
Ciry 0,' TICARD
WASHINGTON' COUNTY, OREGON
L'�ICS
AGREZ'-SFENT AND CONTRACT, mate and entered into at Tigard , Ore:;on, this
day of by and between the City of Tigard of Washington
Cf.)u:ity, State of Oregon, hereinafter called the City, and 7�j�/�',y(;.�.:%EE✓a1cJ�
a firm of consulting; engineers duly authorized to
pertor::i nrof.essional services in the State oC Ore-on, hereinafter called the
UTITtiESSETH THAT: I
• i
IIVERLAS, the City now desires to employ the ;ngineers to perform the er_gineering �
design and the preparation of detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
and the performance of other professional services, which are nect:ssary for the
construction of the followin;, designated public works improvements:
t y:
..t_.2EAS the Engineers have offered their services to perform the necessary
survcvs, engineering designs, preparation of plans and specifications and other
t
contract documents and the related professional services required for the �
irrple:u-ntation of the: public *corks improvements.
IT IS AGREED BETUEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: l
ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS
Tdhenever the term "City" is used herein it is understood to mean the City bf
Tigard of ldashington County, Oregon, or its authorized o[f-icers acid the term
"Ln ineer" or "Engineers" means an authorized representative(s) of 07_1A_,1
ARTICLE II - OBLIGATION OF THE EZGI\EERS
The services to be performed by said Engineers under this contract- are (A)
the professional services required for the preparation of detailed plans,
specifications and other contract documents proceeding the actual construction
wort:, (B) engineering services during construction, and (C) special services which may �
be required. The Engincers will coordinate their :-cork with other Engineers who
may be engaged by the City. The services to be pr_rfor:^ed by the Engineers are
described more particular Ly as follows:
C f
E
AG.'.EE'.'.ENT - Page 1 f
i
A. Professional Services Preceeding Construction:
1. Detailed Plans . The Engineer will collect the necessary data including
information from utility companies and other field inforimation and will prepare
detailed plans for alL units of said improvements. These plans will include the
for the public works facilities as well as other drawings which
necessary details
may be essential to full completion of all units of the said improvements.
2. Specifications. After the plans have been made the Engineers will
prepare such detailed specifications, contract forms and other documents as
will be necessary in the receiving of bids for construction work and in the
performance of contract obligations. The specifications will cover materials and
workmanship and serve as a guide to the building of all features of the project
which may not be fully defined by the plans.
3. Quantity and Cost Estimates. The Engineers will prepare estimates of
the quantities of the materials to be furnished and work to be done. Estimates
of cost will be provided which are to be based upon prices which appear to be
appropriate at the time of plans are complete.
4. Amendments of Plans or Specifications. When plans, specifications and
other documents have been prepared. they will be submitted to the City for
consideration. An engineer familiar with all features of the project will be
available on request of the City for the purpose of explaining the plans- and
other documents. Should the City then request modifications of any kind which
are consistent with food engineering practice, the Engineers will make them be—
for the final documents are issued.
4
5. Approval of Regulatory Agencies. The Engineers will plan the improve—
ments so as to meet the approval of the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission
and other governmental agencies which may be involved, and will assist the City
in any way appropriate to securing the necessary approvals for the facilities
planned.
6. Copies of Plans and Specifications. After their approval by the City ,
and the regulatory agencies, the Engineers will furnish as a part of this
contract the following copies of the plans and specifications above described:
a) Six (6) complete sets to the City for record purposes.
b) As many copies as may be required by other agencies involved,
as listed in Appendix
c) As many copies as may be required by Contractors desiring to
submit bids on the work, it being understood that deposits will
be required to provide for the return of such plans issued and
that a charge may be made by the Engineers for plans and
specifications which may be issued to persons from whom no bona
fide bid is received by the City.
d) Ten (10) sets of documents as may be required in connection with
the preparation of contracts for construction work.
AGRE ENE cT — Page 2
e) Three (3) complete sets of "as built" plans of the work, as it is
finally constructed, to the City for record purposes, one of which
will be a set of transparencies.
7. Contract Awards. A qualified representative of the Engineers will
attend meetings when the receiving of bids and the award of contracts for
construction work are under consideration. They will prepare a tabulation
of bids and will advise and assist the City in any way appropriate to such
occassions.
B. Professional Services During Construction:
1. General Engineering. The Engineers will provide general inspection
of the Contractor's work in behalf of the City, to the extent defined in the
contract documents, by periodic visits to the site of the project to observe
the progress and quality of the work and to determine, in general, if the
work is proceeding in accordance with the intent of the contract documents.
On the basis of these visits, the Engineers will keep the City informed of
the progress of the work, will guard the City against defects and deficiencies
in the work of the Contractor(s) and may reject work or materails that fail
to conform to contract requirements. Visits to the construction site and
observations made by the Engineers shall not relieve the Contractor of his
obligation to conduct comprehensive inspections of the work sufficient to insure.
conformance with the intent of the contract documents, and shall not relieve
the construction contractor of his full responsibility for all construction
means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating
and completing all portions of the work under the construction contract and for
all safety precautions incidental thereto.
The Engineers shall make explanation of any matter which may not be clearly
shown on the plans or in the specifications, incl_rding the modificatdons of
documents if this should be required. They shall prepare and recommend
approval of change orders when applicable. They shall review Contractor's
shop drawings and approve material samples.
2. Final Inspections. The Engineers will make a final inspection of the
completed construction work and report thereon to the City with recommendations
concerning its acceptance or otherwise as conditions may warrant.
3. Resident Inspection of Construction and Field Staking. The Engineers
will furnish the services of a Resident Inspector to provide continuous in-
spection of the work to the Contractor during the period of construction as
well as field personnel and equipment necessary for construction staking. The
Resident Inspector shall be experienced in the type of work to be done to the
end that the work will be properly staked out and that competent inspection
of materials and labor will be provided. He will keep all records, maps, and
plans necessary for the preparation of final "as built" drawings. The
Resident Inspector. will make out weekly reports of construction and monthly
estimates as the basis for payments to the Contractor as construction proceeds_
fie will attend the official meetings of the City each month when the above mentioned
reports and estimates are being considered and will also attend other a;eetings
of the City when requested. Additional engineers, inspectors or assistants
necessary sha271 be provided by the Engineers with the approval of the City. The
Resident Inspector and necessary asssist.ants will guard the City agaLinclude,
ts
and deficiencies in the work of the contractor(s) and help determine
provisions of the contract documents are being fulfilled. Their day -
spection will not, however, cause the Engineer to be responsible for
ditties and responsibilities which belong to the Contractor and which
but are not limited to, full responsibility .for the techniques
the safety precautions incidental thereto,
and sequences of construction and
and for' performing the construction work in accordance witli the contract
documents.
C. Sp( cial. Services:
There may be certain special services desired by the City beyond those listed
under the design and engineering inspection of construction. The type and extent
of all such special services cannot be determined at this time. However, the
Engineers agree. to assist the City and perform such special services as the City
may require, all in order that the City can best accomplish the objective of
providing the facilities needed. Such services may include but are not limited
to the following:
a) Furnish survey personnel and equipment required to obtain design in
formation necessary to prepare satisfactory plans and specifications.
b) Furnish survey personnel and equipment required to obtain field in-
formation necessary to prepare easements and property right-of-way
descriptions as requested or approved by the City.
c) Furnish legal descriptions of easements, rights-of-way and property
required for the project and provide personnel to assist the City
or those designated by the City to obtain easements, rights-of-:ray,
and property as requested by the City.
d) Assist in preparation of Federal grant applications.
e) Assist in preparation of Engineers' report for preliminary assessment,
assessment district maps, lien dockets, assessment rolls, and other work
connected with assessment procedures, and assist in public hearings on
the proposed assessments as requested or approved by the City.
f) Provide personnel and equipment required to perform subsurface explorations
necessary for determining foundation and/or construction conditions as
requested or approved by the City.
g) Provide bacteriological, chemical, mechanical or other tests as requested
or approved by the City.
h) Assist the City in the development of design and construction standards.
i) Provide expert testimony as may be required in connection with the project_
j) Furnish written operating instruction and assemble a complete set of
manufacturers' data and catalogs covering the equipment installed in
the project.
Q After completion• of the project and acceptance from the Contractor(s)
by the City, provide assistance and supervision as required to train
the City's personnel for operation and maintenance of the new facilities_
C AGRF.ERENT - Page 4
7�
FURTHER, it is agreed between the parties hereto as follows:
Insurance. The Engineers shall maintain such insurance as will
protect them and the City from claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act.
Time Schedule. The Engineers shall begin work within 10 days after
notice to proceed and shall diligently prosecute the work to meet the time
schedule(s) adopted by the City.
ARTICLE III - OBLIGATION OF CITY
The work required under this contract shall not begin nor shall the City assume:
obligation for the work involved until the Engineers are given written notice to
proceed and the scope of the work authorized outlined in detail.
In order to facilitate the work of the Engineers as above outlined and to in-
. sure proper and adequate planning in construction procedure the City shall furnish
i
to the Engineers access to all existing information which is in its possession
concerning the location of sewer and water lines and other utilities or structures
f
which may affect the planning and construction of the proposed improvements.
Should it be necessary to excavate in order to locate and make available to the
i
Engineers any existing structures necessary for proper planning of the proposed �
r
work, the City shall cause such excavation and incidental work connected therewith
to be done without cost to the Engineers.
• l
The City shall pay for the cost of publishing advertisements for bids, and for
l
permits and licenses that may be required by local, State, or Federal authorities
t
and shall secure the necessary land, easements, and rights-of-way.
FOR AND IN CONSIDER_NTION of the Engineers faithfully performing the services
.herein stipulated, the City shall pay them sums which shall be as outlined below in
• C
accordance with the services rendered:
A. For the engineering services as outlined in Article II, Sections A(1-7) and
B (1&2), required for the design of public works facilities, the City shall pay the
Engineers a sum which shall be determined by (Curve Was recommended by the
schedule of suggested fees of the current Manual No. 45 of American Society of Civil
Engineers applicable upon the date notice to proceed is issued.
For projects involving modifications, expansion, or renovation of existing facilities
the basic fee under the above-mentioned curves shall be increased by a negotiated
per cent depending upon the circumstances.
a) . Monthly progress payments shall be made to the Engineers during the
preparation of the detailed plans, and such progress payments shall
be based upon progress estimates of the work done, which have been i
submitted by the Engineers and approved by the City..
r
AGREEMENT - Page 5
. k
b) When the plans and specifications have been completed and approved,
the City shall pay the Engineers a su[n which with all previous pay-
ments shall equal 80 percent of the total fee applicable based on
the Engineer's estimate at the time the plans and specifications
are submitted to the City.
c) The balance of the fee shall be paid to the Engineers during con-
struction in proportion to the work completed by the contractor(s).
B. For the services the Resident Inspector and other inspectors or assistants
required for the construction inspection and field staking as outlined in Article II,
Section B (3), the City shall pay the Engineers scheduled rates as set forth in
Appendix "A". These rates include all supplies required for the work and automobile
transportation within a 5 mile radius of the Engineer's office.
C. For soils investigations which may be required as outlined in Article II,
Section C, the Engineers shall be reimbursed at their invoiced costs plus 3.3 per-
cent, for the services of soils specialists, laboratory testing and required sampling,
drilling and/or excavation. For other technical or professional services furnished
by outside sources, as requested or approved by the City, an additional 8 per cent
shall be added to cover the Engineers' administrative and continuing project respcnsi-
bilities.
D. For any special services required by the Engineers' staff as outlined in
Article II, Section C, of this Agreement, the City agrees to pay the Engineers j
scheduled rates as set forth in Appendix "A", automobile travel within a 5 -mile
radius of the Engineers' office is included in the scheduled rates. All other costs
of the Engineers will be billed at the actual amounts of such costs. These costs,
as applicable, will include, but are not necessarily limited to obtaining as con-- f
structed plans, printing and reproduction work. s
9
5
E. If the City directs that competitive bids are taken for construction on
alternate designs, where this involves the preparation of designs, plans, and
specifications for alternate structures, the compensation to the Engineers shall ,
be the payment specified in Article III, Section A, for the design of work to be q
constructed, plus_, for the alternate designs prepared for work not constructed, an
additional payment to be negotiated at the time the City directs that alternative
designs, plans and specifications be prepared.
F. If the Engineering services covered in this Agreement have not been
completed upon the expiration of an eighteen (18) month period from the date of
execution of this Agreement, the City or Engineers may, at the option of either,
on written notice, request a renogotiation of Article III, Sections A-D, (providing
for the compensation to be paid Engineers for services rendered), .to allow for changes {{
i
in the cost of•services. Such new schedule of compensation is to apply only to
work performed by the Engineers after delivery date of such written notice.
G. If time of construction is extended because of circumstances beyond the
control of the Engineers, payments for Article II, Section B(1), General Engineering-
professional Services During Construction, shall. apply only through the period ending
thirty (30) calendar days after the applicable completion date specified in the
construction contract of the project. Payment for this service beyond thirty (30)
days after said specified completion date shall be paid for under Article III, Section D.
AGREEKENT - Page 6
• i
sole discretion, abandon or indefinitely postpone tine
H.' The City may, in its
ional services described herein are to be performed
project for which the profess
and way thereupon terminate this Agreement by giving the Engineers written notice
the project
of such abandonment or indefinite postponement. If any portion of
covered in this Agreement and designed or specified by the Engineers shall be sus—
pended, abated, or abandoned, the City shall pay the Engineers for the services
render=d for such suspended, abated or abandoned work, the payment to be based in—
sofar as possible on the amounts established in this Agreement , or,
whereAgreement cannot be applied, the payment shall be on the basis of the amounts as
prescribed in Article III, Section D.
Iti WITNESS tdHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be executed
in duplicate by their respectively authorized officers ox representatives.
i
CITY OF TIGARD
Byf�- � 1
By
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
ENGINEERS /1 ,4A!' ZAAC—=iC!/��j �o
By — ./r�2,s G.r-
By
AGREEtIENT - Page 7
Ji::t'LG
• APPENDIX "A"
S
ENGINEER:
Scheduled Rates /98�
OFFICE
per hour
Pr inc i al _---- ----- " "
Project Engineer " •' _
Engineer EIT 30.00
Design--Technician __--
Draftsman
Non-Technician
I
FIELD
$ per hour
Three-man crew
_ . - ---
Two-man_cre_.__._ .
Resident Engineer
Resident Inspector -
- _ k
Field rates include field equipment ment and transportation cost within a 5-mile -
radius of our office. Travel outside a 5-mile radius shall be charged at
O_ cents per mile..
f
DATE: July 8, 1982
TO: CITY COUNCIL A
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT (_,
SUBJECT: NPO # 5 Membership Appointments
The Planning Commission recommended the following inidividuals be
appointed to NPO # 5.
1. Debra Naubert
2. Sharon Takahashi
3. Chris Vanderwood
All of these people live within the Tigard City Limits.
C
N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
NAME i ADDRESS__/S/_?Cg
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.)�y�• 3X�?G (Res.)
PRESENT OCCUPATION
FI RM NAME
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED W H THIS FIRM?_p?
IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA? yzp :y
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? �O
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO?
J
ADDITIONAL COM& NTS:
DAYTIME. TELEPHONE NUMBER_
.. E
{
f
INVENTORY OF CITIZENS
Suggested for Community Service / G
DATE,
RES . PHONE
7A�`IE
PHONE-
;,DD ��o ILI
BUS . pHOVE
,ENGTHI OF RESIDENCE IN TIGARD S SUGGESTED BY
THERE DID YOU LIVE PREVIOUSLY? ' GhE-
LGE 2 MARITAL STATUS eL — CHILDREN
7.DUCATI01dAL BACKGROUND
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS AND BACKGROUND-JV4
?RE,IOUS COL'vLWNITY ACTIVITY ,
e
3RGANIZATIONS AND OF ES
DTHER INFORMATION (GENERAL REI-LARKS)
u
G -
30ARDS OR CON^u%1ITTEES INTERESTED IN—
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
date Received at City Hall Date Intervie-•red
)ate Appointed Board or Committee --
,SIDE CITY OUTSIDE CITY
rRI
Yi
N P O A P P L I C A T I O N
QUESTION: What are NPO's?
ANSWER: The function of each NPO is to be involved in all phases of
the Comprehensive Planning process and the implementation of those
plans; to review City plans; policies, projects or other actions
affecting the livability of the neighborhood, including, but not limited
to, land use, zoning, housing, community, facilities, human resources,
social and recreational programs, traffic and transportation, environ-
mental quality, open space and parks; to participate in the process
"of determining City priorities for capital improvements and development
of specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed; to seek
neighborhood opinion on issues brought before them; to represent the
views of the neighborhood in matters of extra neighborhood importance.
PLEASE COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS BELOW
NAb3E c�s�c��ec�loc�. ADDRESS�Lw-:_�,`
.cmc C�
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Bus.) (Res.)l - �Q _�
PRESENT OCCUPATION 0irl,
FIRM NAME
�- HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EMPLOYED WITH THIS FIRM?
t IS THIS COMPANY LOCATED WITHIN YOUR NPO AREA?
HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS BEFORE? r\JN
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR INVOLVEMENT:
WHAT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A MEMBER OF AN NPO?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER L�,aC!, -3D1n
o.6 clTy of I I I � R II
TIGARD v ECEIVED - -
cow f. I I w
UL 0 '� 1982
WASHINGTON
"OF '1GARD
In
El.ot�or, a
o
June 29, 1982 _ o � p,
rn a� qq pip .
Peg• 1 of 1 pe9es z m I N y
Nene or Ballot Number H m
No.of Predod YF.S I NO I I YES I NO I I I I A O
i ( --I T
30 59 108 60 105 O p
31 65 88 89 65 I nrn
32 81 183 1121 144 O z
33 44 71 51 63 H
34 132 I 163 160 135
35 37 85 62 60
40 79 124 108 96 _
41 143 185 1173 159
46 35 I 76 51 60 ( I a
ABSENTEES 15 17 10 21
v v z
I I _- -
IO- 3
" :3
I I " • �
I
I
I
I I o�
I - a
n
o
ys f p N_
TOTAL 690 11100 I 88 908 I I
I certify that the votes recorded on this abstract co'
- �areoun Clerk: Date of Abstract
redly summarize the (ally of votes test at the election ^ 7
indicated C� a
ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT GENERAL AND ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT PRIMARY ELECTIONS:
SPECIAL ELECTIONS: Separate sheets for Democratic, Republican, Nonpartisan, and other
candidates.
Votes cast for Governor must be on separate Separate sheets for candidates for City, County (including precinct)
I page or pages. and State office.
1
I For additional instructions see ORS 250.810. For additional instructions, see ORS 249.410.
P-t �uc'CQ (v-3o-Sy
dr II .. ✓ /
C/lf ristiam K rel 13405 S.W.Halt Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone 639-5713
Rob Blakely,Minister Clare Buhler,hler,
Associate Minister
27 June 1982
Greetings Bob :
Thanks much for making sure that the drive ways were accessible
for the weekend. Everything was satisfactory and I appreciate
the attention you gave to the matter.
Sincerely,
G'
June 30, 1982
i
The Honorable County Commissioners
Washington County Courthouse
150 N. First Avenue
Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
ATTENTION: Virginia Dagg, Chairman
Lucille Warren, Commissioner for Tigard Area
Dear Commissioners :
The residents of Summerfield are concerned over the quality of life in
their community because of the noise from heavy tractor-trailer traffic
on Durham Road .
We request that you reconsider the City of Tigard ' s resolution to put
a load limit on Durham Road ; that you open the subject to discussion
with input from the public; and that you explain why the alternative
routes (99W and 217•) cannot be used for the intercity and interstate
tractor-trailer traffic.
A committee from Summerfield has been working with the City of Tigard
since October of 1981 to solve the problem. The City has agreed that
Durham Road is a residential collector street; that the noise and air
pollution is intolerable for the quality homes that line the street;
that there are existing alternatives for the industries whose tractor-
trailers are using Durham Road as a connection from 15 to 99W on their
way to destinations in Yamhill County and beyond .
Tractor-trailers hauling logs from out of state, tankers carrying pet-
roleum as well as chemicals, bulk farm materials , wood chips, car convoys
and others form a constant procession of vehicular traffic. They make
the homes along Durham Road subject to eternal blaring noise.
The federal Department of Transportation released a study in May that
found that trucks are paying only 65% of their fair share of federal
road-use taxes . The most widely accepted test of roadway damage con-
ducted in 1962 found that damage increases exponentially with weight--
a fully loaded tractor-trailer does the same pavement damage as 9, 600
cars . When you add to that the social damage (cost) to the homes from
trucks , the residents of Summerfield whose homes line the north side e
of Durham Road are put in the position of paying substantially more in
subsidy to the trucking industry, thus increasing their tax load by
depreciating their property. F
The Commission' s June decision regarding Durham Road seemed arbitary �.
because we have had no dialogue on it with, you.
I
Page 2
Washington County Commissioners
Re: Durham Road
June 30, 1982
The Summerfield Committee members are:
Eunice Day Tel . 620-0843
Art Marchetti 297-8211
Dave Atkinson 639-1402
Sincerely,
Summerfield Board of Directors
Fred Joe e, Chairman
cc: City of Tigard i
r
l
y
l
7-
June
June 25 , 1982
i
PUBLIC OFFICIALS CAUCUS NOTICE
Extension Farm Tour - Thursday, July 15 , 1982
Sponsored by : Washington County Extension
Advisory Council
The objective of this tour is to inform elected officials
of the economic condition of local farming enterprises and
the roles that the Extension Service plays with this size-.
able group of citizens in Washington County.
2 :00 P.M. - Meet at the O.S .U. Extension Office near
Hillsboro (across from Hale ' s Restaurant
and next to the county shops on Tualatin
Valley Highway) . Here we will distribute
name tags , get acquainted and introduce
the Extension Service .
2 : 30 p.m. - Board bus for tour.
3 : 00 p.m. - HODGES BLUEBERRIES
There are many small farms in Washington
County with very specific problems and
opportunities . The Extension Service works
with all sizes of farms with" concerns
�. ranging from production to marketing.
3 . 30 p.m. - VANDERZANDEN BROTHERS FARM
Conservation is a major thrust in Extension
farm projects and we will look at how a con-
cept is put to practice at this stop. County
Extension staff utilize field plots to demon-
demonstrate the latest farming technologies
that originate from Extension specialists
at O.S .U.
4 : 15 p.m. - JOSSY FILBERT ORCHARD
Filberts are one of the few bright spots in
a rather bleak farm economy . We will dis-
cuss the future of this crop and the role
of the Extension Service.
5 :00 p.m. - Return to Extension Office .
Before the barbecue dinner we will briefly discuss one of
the Extension Service 's strengths - the use of volunteers .
4-H volunteer leaders involved with youth raising puppies
for seeing-eye and police dog programs will discuss and
give a demonstration of their programs . A volunteer leader
will also discuss a program involving gardening for the
mentally disabled.
i
-continued-
.y
PUBLIC OFFICIALS CAUCUS NOTICE
PAGE 2
i
6 : 15 p.m. - Barbecue - $2 . 50 per person.
Dinner will include grilled hamburgers , hot
dogs and other picnic foods .
7 : 15 p.m. - The Public Officials Caucus will gather in
a meeting in the Extension Office following
the barbecue to discuss recent developments
with the Westside Solid Waste Transfer Sta-
tion.
One of the members of the Extension Advisory Council will
be contacting you in regards to the July 15 tour and ba---
becue. These individuals are citizens representing various
program areas that the Extension Service works with. We
hope you will be able to share your time with us on
July 15 .
Sincerely,
Wade Peterson
Federal Land Bank
876 S .E. Oak
Hillsboro, OR 97123
648-0704
CR:kcp
t,
July 6, 1982 /
t
City of Tigard
12755 S•W- Ash Ave.
P.O.Dox 23397
Tigard, Or. 97223
Attn: Tigard City Council
Re: Zone Change (Durham Island)
On the 12, of July. 1982 at the regular City Council Meeting you are
requesting Zone changes from Washington County RU-4 and MA-1 to City of
Tigard zoning. Upon recieving the public hearing notice I called the city
hall to check just what this zone change meant. I was informed that the
city was only changing the zones in name sake only to be in conjunction
with the citys system ie; R-5, R-7. I then informed the person that I
talked to that my property was zoned RU-20 and not RU-4. They disputed my
word and I asked them to check with the county and was told someone would,
and that they would call me back. Alas I never heard from anyone. Sorry to
say I didn't get a name unfortuntaly.
Now for the grit of the matter. I called the zoning dept. of Washington
County myself and was assured my property was zoned RU-20 by county zoning.
As my property is located in Tax Map 2S1, 12C, Tax Lot 500, on S.W. 76 at.
it is my opinion that changing my zoning from RU-20 to R-7 will decrease
the valvue on my property which I object to. For your information all the
propertys located on S.W. 76 at. in that area are zoned RU-20 on the East
side of the street. I did. not have any trouble getting the information
as to the proper zoning. It makes me wonder if the city did all its homework
as to the proposed zone change. I therefor request that the City not
approve the proposed change involving the propertys which lie east of
south west 76 at. and the zoning to remain the same as it was zoned by
the county.
Thank you.
hn Schwart
15900 S,W. 76 at.
Tigard Or. 97223.
c
{
TO: Tigard City Council
FROM: NPO �
DAT July 7. ,a32
SULIJECT: Planned Density in NPO 3
Jr. December 197.5, the Cit,} Council adupted the I:rO T 3 Flan as part of its
comprehensive plan. That plan specified 115ulLurti sn" Density, of 3 units per
acre for much of IPO .1 3. This designation coorelates to RIO Zoning,.
The Suburban Density of 3 units/acre for RPO # 3 was also incorporated into
the TiKard Housing Flan, adopted April 11, 1977 '�y the Tigard City Council.
However, when the City Plan Map *.-:as adopted
the "Suburban"- Density -was omitted, rosultin6 in much of the land that was
designated R 10 in the first two documents becomir•L,- R 7 in the City Plan Iap.
In the IdPD -1 3 Plan, the reasons for selecting this density are listed, but
in the Minutes of meetings leading up to adoption of the City Plan elan, no
reasons are mentioned for desired change from R 10 to R 7 in this area of
NPO mJ* 3.
Our conclusion is that the change was inadvertant by the Cl,,y Council. We
ask you to pass a resolution restoring the planned density in this area froim
R 7 tact: to R 10.
Also, in the ATPO r 3 Plan, the area under 'cSucuruan Low" Density were specified
as 2 units per acre, which was also supported in the 1977 Housing Plan. This
corresponds to a zone of R 20 or R 30. In the City Plan r•:ap, this area was
changed to R 10, again with no reason given. We request that your resolution
also restore t?ie planned density i?� i :ese areas to F
We realize that in the up-coming, formulation of a new Comprehensive Flan,
the planned densities for many areas are likely to chane. However, the
st Aing point for considering changes should be the: previously agreed
desic-nations.
VIP 1� 3 l
cc: Tigard Planning Connrnission
/o
July 7, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: City Administrator/City Council
From: Chief of Police
I
Subject: Police Mission, Goals and Priorities Resolution
f
Sir:
t
i
The attached resolution has been revised as a result of City Council
input from the June 21, 1982 Council meeting.
Section 3 of the resolution has been amended to clarify mandatory
"criminal and traffic" functions, and the last sentence has been amended
by deleting the word "discretionary".
In addition to the above, the discretionary service priorities are now
identified in Exhibit A along with criminal and traffic priorities. The t
Exhibit A matrix illustrates the scope of priorities on a basis of
violence, life threatening or a potential for violence or injury in
Priority I. Priority II are non-violent crimes, or discretionary service
calls, public safety hazards, non-injury accidents, etc. Priority III
are non-violent cold crimes, general traffic matters and general s
discretionary calls that are not life threatening.
This resolution will establish a structured service delivery process,
provide guidance and understanding, as well as what services will
terminate or be delayed when limited police resources are exhausted.
Respectfully,
R. B. Adams ,
Chief of Police
RBA:lw
Ah AF Am ViKm( CIVIL ENGINEERING
ER PLANNING• SURVEYING
WM Soc rates inc.
RECE/vEa
June 28, 1982
10961 `JUN 3 1982
CITy OF TIOARD
City of Tigard
12420 S.W. Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Attention: Bob Thompson
Re: Englewood, Phase I, II, III
Dear Bob:
Please be apprised of the following informational data.
The developers of the above named subdivision namely,
Commonwealth Properties, Inc. have been disolved and Comnun-
wealth is no longer an entity.
The prime contractor, Cornell Excavating, Inc. disbanded
and the owner/owners are no longer in the area.
To repair, if required, the sanitary sewer would entail
removal of the paved streets and of course based upon the above
facts there is no one to attribute or bill these repair costs.
We would recommed acceptance of the subdivision and a
wait and see approach as to the significance of the T.V. film
of the sanitary sewers.
We do appreciate your concern and bringing the potential
problem to our attention but in the light of a non-existing
company or contractor cannot assist you in this instance.
Please feel free to use our services or resources at all
times.
Sincerely,
WAKER ASSOCIATES, INC.
Paul A. Childress
Construction Manager
PAC:ms
11080 S.W. ALLEN BLVD. / SUITE 100 / BEAVERTON, OREGON 97005 / (503) 643-9410
DJB INC. 11515 S.W. 91ST AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 U.S.A. (503) 639-2900 m
gwia 28, 1982-73CARD C?TY C01MCM DEL W.BALL L7
item: 6,
0/L4 82-29
Au l7ayxm and Caursc i.P_a .-
/'1l name ZZ C:Rxa.� L. BmU, 11515 S. 19. 91 a.t Aue., T.i gand, and J am r�ea�,:tulg
DA Jnw..6 and nu � c lana �
J am l eaduzg .thio .so y-azz may have a zopy and w.e a 6o may haLrz a c�
The gu est -um w.e haue .rte n ecgal .ta S z-bi a ( 5. &Y(DF iC-1'JVCY CL4ILSC
Llau .this mean that y�au a ze zhangtjzg .the 9-oundaA4..e6 0. thesa as
.ta �zeawz .acme aE .the p/u yzen_tcy aZzea4 anlzpxed .ta .the Crt a�T sa .Lt
&"-a no eangez Ze .uz .the Ciw
The aeaaon w.e a-6h .tJt,6 gues.ti:m r a Ro=� an at� ,ta do ;t, d th,s on
zDme a-� au-zaccunic an Augaz t 25, 1982' when .the CZ a,-P T.i gaud
canduCted a r � mate. Me w.etie taXd 4h6hi tcgt
Cawz4 Avrtega-,f de.sc,� A then �:gecti an. Az gau know,
.the Arrmexa tion /lea as e- AmZ&G
J/- tA--a .e s .the yzuir2ocee, .then am wanrt .ta ga as 2ecaad as GIe
wau Pd eine t a haue an ar _t4 what th e-z F1'fRGFJYC C A,,,,
does �,
GIe Q ah that .tAzz r,ci.tlz aLt anwzqz ?,a made p,,urt o� .the Cita o. 7-
�recovrc�
A
CENTER FOR POPULATION RESEARCH AND CENSUS JO4
Portland State University 0 X98
Portland, Oregonox J197207 �iTr�FT/(,q�,0
t. Supplement III
June 30, 1982
Table A: Annexations
SUPPLEMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF POPULATION ENUMERATION AND ESTIMATES OF
OREGON COUNTIES AND INCORPORATED CITIES, JULY 1, 1981
County Previously Annexation Population Certified
and Certified Ordinance of Annexed Population
City Population Number Area _ June 30, 1982
CLACKAMAS
Gladstone 9805 1811 4 9809
Lake Oswego 23254 1775 12 23266
Milwaukie 17930 1802 2
1803 2 17934
Oregon City 14938 1793 42 14980
COLUMBIA
Scappoose 3292 435 14 3306
JACKSON
Ashland 15230 2190 10 15240
Medford 40215 4600 14 40229
LINN
Lebanon 10584 1870 20 10604
MULTNOMAH
Portland 367569 1731 5
1736 46
1738 29
1739 33
1773 10
1774 2
1781 40
1785 14 367748
UMATILLA
Milton-Freewater 5319 644 1 5320
WASHINGTON
Cornelius 4768 1810 6 4778
Hillsboro 28680 1809 1
1724 6
1728 28
1730 1 28722
Sherwoo 2427 1798 2 2429�1e
[Tigar—d 16094 1818 6
(N. Dakota) 1817* 493
(Alderbrook) 1819* 434
(Durham) 1820* 212
1766 5 17244
- census taken by Census Bureau
June 30, 1932
Table A: ,annexations
Page 2
X Indicates annexation censuses conducted by the Center for Population Research
and Census before June 30, 1952.
FOR THE STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Edward Schafer
Director
Center for Population Research and Census
Portland State University
7
r
7J
at >
_ rt
1
i
J
Y-)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Washington County Board of Commissioners,
Washington County Planning Department and
Community Planning Organization # 4 (CPO # 4)
FROM: Tigard Neighborhood Planning Organization # 3 (NPU # 3)
DATE: July 7, 1982
SUBJECT: Extension of SW Murray Blvd. or SW 135th Avenue
The Washington County Planning Department is promoting the idea of a new road
from SW Scholls Ferry Road to SW Gaarde and SW Pacific Highway as part of its
Transportation Plan. The area transversed by this road is in both CPO # 4 and
NPO # 3. This new proposed road would serve to connect traffic from Beaverton
via SW Murray Blvd. to Tigard and beyond, via SW Gaarde to SW Pacific Highway;
thus it would be an arterial roadway. This change of use of SW Gaarde from a
collector in a residential neighborhood to an arterial roadway is in violation
of NPO # 3 Comprehensive Plan.
Also, the Tigard City Council has in the past voiced opposition to the increased
traffic that would result on SW Pacific Highway. They have expressed preferance
for a connection using a more southerly road, such as Beef Bend Road.
We are especially concerned that NPO # 3 has not been consulted in the formulation
of this proposed major roadway. Only through coordination can thougfIful planning
be achieved.
Our meetings are held on the third Wednesday of every month at Tigard City Hall .
Your response would appreciated.
NPO # 3
lam
cc: Tigard City Council /
Tigard Planning Commission t.
i