City Council Packet - 06/21/1982 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to
STUDY/SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA speak on an agenda item needs to c
JUNE 21, 1982, 7:30 P.M. sign their name on the appropriate
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is
LECTURE ROOM provided, ask to be recognized by
the Chair.
1. STUDY/SPECIAL MEETING:
1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 - Call to Staff, Council and Audience For Non-Agenda Items Under
Open Agenda
2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be
enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may
request that an item be removed for discussion and separate action.
Motion to:
Receive and File Monthly Reports
2.-2-7!3 Receive and File Leron Heights Suit Update
��Accept the following and authorize appropriate signatures:
o Permanent Slope Easement - Ray S Jo Anne Wolf - SW McDonald
Street
o Street Dedication - McCall Oil Company - SW Tigard Street.
Approve OLCC Application - American Legion Picnic - 1 day
permit for Cook Park
2.5 Receive and File Letter from Schmidt Sanitary Service, Inc.
-requesting rate increase consideration
t.
3. PUBLIC WORKS - Director of Public Works
Resolution of Intent for 74th Avenue LID Public Hearing
Resolution # 82- s-,/
Resolution of Intent for McKenzie Street LID Public Hearing
Resolution # 82-,Yz:3-
Ordinance for Street Excavations # 82-.z
3.4 Ordinance for Surcharge Fee In-Lieu-Of Sewer Assessment #82- 6/21-
3.5 Status Report on: Street Improvements, Right-of-way,
Landscaping, Walnut Street, Durham Road, & 121st Avenue
P.0 _-
-�4. POLICE - Chief of Police* J�`yell
- 4.1 Alarm Ordinance Discussion
__,4.2 Resolution for Police Response Priority Policy Goals Discussion
5. PLANNING - Planning Staff r
5.1 Comprehensive Plan Report 6
5.2 Annexation Report & Annexation Policy Statement Ordinance
Greenway Towncenter Resolution #82-_rZ_ Initiating Request For
Zone Change and Comprehensive Plan Amendment _
5.4 Sign Code Amendments DiscussionG`
Floyd's Restaurant Discussion
6. FINANCE - Finance Director
i 6.1 Budget Adjustments
6.2 Charter Amendments Discussion
Ordinance Amendinga Charge for Park Barbeque Grate Use
7. ADMINISTRATION - City Administrator
7.1 Water Contract Extension Request Resolution 1182- T--�'
8'' OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the
Chair under item 1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are
encouraged to contact the City Admnistrator prior to the meeting.
8.1 Resolution # 82- ,� Supporting Civic Center Proposal
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION
9.1 Labor Relations Issues - ORS 192.660 (1)(f)
9.2 Acquisition of Real Property - ORS 192.660 (1)(e)
10. OPEU/TMEA Contract Approval
11. Council Comments
12. Adjournment
8_
8.Z 72
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL. AGENDA - JUNE 21, 1982
T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian, John
Cook, Kenneth Scheckla (arriving at 7:54 P.M.); Chief of
Police, Robert Adams (arriving at 7:48 P.M./leaving at
9:35 P.M.); Director of Public Works/Planning Director,
Frank Currie; Finance Director/City Recorder, Doris
Hartig; City Administrator, Bob Jean; Legal Counsel, Mark
O'Donnell; Office Manager, Loreen Wilson.
2. CALL TO STAFF, COUNCIL AND AUDIENCE FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN
AGENDA.
(a) City Administrator requested the following items be considered
under Open Agenda.
.1 Resolution No. 82- Supporting Civic Center Proposal
.2 Noxious Weeds Report
.3 Ratify Tentative Planning Director Appointment
.4 Report on Letter by City Administrator to Mr. Petsinger
.5 Discussion of 72nd Avenue Traffic Hazard (Request by
Councilor Brian)
.6 Ratify TCYS Election Results
3. RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY REPORTS
e Building, Finance, Library, Municipal Court, Planning and Police
r
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive
monthly reports.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
4. RECEIVE AND FILE LERON HEIGHTS SUIT UPDATE
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive
and file Leron Heights Suit Update.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
5. ACCEPT THE FOLLOWING AND AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATE SIGNATURcS:
o Permanent Slope Easement - Ray & Jo Anne Wolf - SW McDonald
Street.
e Street Dedication - McCall Oil Company - SW Tigard Street.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to accept
and authorize appropriate signatures.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
6. APPROVAL OLCC APPLICATION - American Legion Picnic - 1 day permit for
Cook Park.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
i
7. RECEIVE AND FILE LETTER FROM SCHMIDT SANITARY SERVICE, INC. -
Requesting rate increase consideration.
(a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive
and file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
8. RESOLUTION No. 82-54 DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN
STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A
STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS
LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT No. 27, SW 74TH AVENUE;
DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE COST THEREOF; DEFINING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND ASSESSED;
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER; AND
SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE
THEREOF.
(a) Director of Public Works recommended Council adoption of the
resolution which would call for a public hearing for 74th Avenue
LID for July 12, 1982 at 7:30 P.M. He stated the method of
assessment and type of improvements to be made are consistent
with Council direction from the June 14, 1982 meeting.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian, to
approve resolution and amend to read 7:30 P.M. for public
hearing.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
CHIEF OF POLICE ARRIVED: 7:48 P.M.
9. RESOLUTION No. 82-55 DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN
STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A
STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS
LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT No. 36, SW MC KENZIE;
DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE COST THEREOF; DEFINING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND ASSESSED;
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER; AND
SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE
THEREOF.
(a) Director of Public Works advised Council of the scope of the
work and stated the preliminary cost was $56,500. He
recommended adoption of the resolution to call for public
hearing on July 12, 1982 at 7:30 P.M. He also requested Council
insert the figure of $56,500 in paragraph (b) of the first page.
COUNCILOR SCHECKLA ARRIVED: 7:54 P.M.
(b) Councilor Brian questioned the number of property owners
involved in the project. Discussion followed regarding the
boundaries of the LID and scope of the project.
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
(c) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve
resolution and insert in paragraph (b) the figure $56,500.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
10. ORDINANCE No. 82-28 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 15.04.050, STREET
AND ALLEY EXCAVATIONS, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(a) Director of Public Works reported the purpose of this ordinance
was to allow the City of Tigard to not have to hold another
municipality responsible for obtaining bonding on a public
improvement project. He recommended this since other
municipalities already obtain bonding from the contractor on
public improvements. Director of Public Works recommended
approval.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to
adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11. ORDINANCE No. 82- AN ORDINANCE FOR ADDITION TO CHAPTER 12,
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO SEWER CONNECTION
SURCHARGE FEE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT FOR CONNECTION TO
SANITARY SEWER WITHIN CITY LIMITS AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
(a) City Administrator and Director of Public Works requested
Council consider ordinance for adoption at the June 28th
meeting. Staff recommended approval since Council's policy is
to require everyone to pay for the cost of a sewer line even if
they have not participated in an LID.
(b) Consensus of Council was to adopt ordinance at 6-28-82 meeting.
12. STATUS REPORT: Public Works Issues
(a) Director of Public Works reported that Washington County has
committed to giving money to the City of Tigard for paving
Walnut Street. He recommended Council consider paving the bike
path at the same time, though the area is outside the city
limits right now, because it would be cost effective.
(b) Lengthy discussion followed regarding the policy issue of making
public improvements to property outside the city limits. 3-1
consensus of Council, Councilor Scheckla opposing, was to spend
the County monies on Walnut Street improvements without any
matching funds from the City since the property was outside the
city limits at this time.
(c) Director of Public Works reported that he would present the
alternatives for improvements on the street in July for Council
consideration. This project would be included in the fall
overlay program.
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
(d) Director of Public Works described in some detail many of the
current projects being completed by the Public Works crews.
City Administrator reported that 121st Avenue will receive
additional speed patrol and targeted enforcement.
Mayor Bishop requested staff patrol McDonald and Tiedeman
streets more and check the speed posting in those areas. He
also requested staff investigate the possibility of installing a
4-way stop at the intersection of Tiedeman and Tigard Streets.
City Administrator stated staff would study issue and respond to
the request in detail at a later date.
Director of Public Works advised Council that City of Tualatin
is proposing a by-pass from I-5 to Pacific Highway near Sherwood
be constructed. He stated that if this by-pass were constructed
Durham Road would experience less heavy truck traffic. He will
keep Council updated on the development of this project.
Director of Public Works noted that the State Highway Department
is working on the traffic light progression problems on 99W.
Further reports will come to Council on this issue.
13. RESOLUTION No. 82-56 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY AND
PURPOSE FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR 72ND
AVENUE AREA LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, DIRECTING AN
ATTEMPT TO AGREE WITH OWNERS AS TO COMPENSATION;
THEREFORE AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE
SAID RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
(a) Director of Public Works requested Council start the
condemnation process by adopting the resolution. This would not
allow the City to actually condemn property along 72nd Avenue,
however it would start the process.
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
14. ALARM ORDINANCE DISCUSSION
(a) Chief of Police presented the alarm ordinance draft and
discussed items which have been amended.
(b) Councilor Brian expressed concern that the City may not recover
the costs of service. City Administrator responded that if the
cost of the fee is too high the citizens would be discouraged
from installing alarms which would be counter-productive.
(c) Councilor Cook expressed concern regarding the number of alarms
from the school district properties. He requested a report from
the Chief of Police in months on not only this, matter, but a
complete overview of a su_cess and/or problems encountered
with the alarm perm - system.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
Chief of Police reported that Council would be receiving
information, monthly, regarding the permit system.
Chief of Police stated this would be before Council for adoption
on 6-28-82.
15. RESOLUTION FOR POLICE RESPONSE PRIORITY POLICY GOALS DISCUSSION
(a) Chief of Police discussed the goals and priorities for the
Police Response Priority Policy and Goals. He noted that this
was drafted to reflect the Council's concerns and budget
priorities as funded.
(b) Councilor Brian requested this ordinance also set out the
priorities in the criminal and traffic calls along with the
discretionary service calls.
Chief stated this would be drafted for Council review and the
ordinance would be presented as soon as possible for Council
adoption.
CHIEF OF POLICE LEFT: 9:35 P.M.
16. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT
(a) Associate Planner Coursolle gave a brief update on the Comp Plan
status and stated the Plan elements were being drafted and
presented to various NPO's and committies.
17. ORDINANCE No. 82-29 AN ORDINANCE SPECIFYING THE ANNEXATION POLICY
FOR VARIOUS UNINCORPORATED LANDS WHICH ARE WITHIN
TIGARD'S URBAN PLANNING AREA, REPEALING ORDINANCE No.
79-26, PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
(a) Associate Planner Coursolle presented an update on the current
status of annexation of unincorporated lands within the Planning
Area. He noted that an ordinance had been prepared for Council
6pproval which would set out the Council's policy on
annexations, and recommended adoption.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt.
Approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present, Councilor
Scheckla voting nay.
Ordinance No. 82-29 will require a second reading.
18. RESOLUTION No. 82-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
INITIKTING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION AND A ZONE
CHANGE FOR THE GREENWAY TOWN CENTER.
(a) Associate Planner Coursolle presented the resolution for action
by Council, per their request.
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
19. SIGN CODE ADMENDMENTS DISCUSSION
(a) Associate Planner Coursolle distributed copies of the sign code
amendments to the Council and stated there would be public
hearings held on this revision before Planning Commission. He
brought the sign code to the Council for their comments.
(b) Mr. Allan Paterson, local businessman, cautioned Council and
staff that this would be a dangerous and emotional issue and
suggested that a committee might be formed to study the issues
further before initiating the public hearing process.
(c) City Administrator expressed concern that a formal committee
would be too long a process if this portion of the code was to
be implemented in time for the Comp Plan review date. He
suggested that concerned citizens could get copies of the
suggested amendments and be able to have an opportunity for
expressing their concerns at the public hearings which are held
for that purpose.
(d) Building Official gave brief update on the current status of
sign code violation enforcement.
20. FLOYD'S RESTAURANT DISCUSSION
(a) Associate Planner Coursolle presented memo from staff reporting
that Floyd's Restaurant has been doing some expansion of their
current premises. Staff had received some complaints on the
issue and were requested to report review findings to Council.
Associate Planner Coursolle reported that Mr. Bergmann had
complied with all City requirements in the remodeling.
(b) Mayor Bishop discussed problems on Main Street with certain
businesses and their non-compliance with conditions placed on
the establishments in prior years through planning requests.
(c) City Administrator stated he would check on various problems
mentioned by the Mayor and pursue.
(d) Mayor Bishop requested City investigate taking a more agressive
stance on compliance with conditions set through planning
requests in the future.
City Administrator said he would discuss this possibility with
Legal Counsel and report back to Council.
21. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
(a) Finance Director advised Council of the budget adjustments which
have been made due to TMEA ratification and other last minutes
necessary revisions.
PAGE( - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
22. CHARTER AMENDMENTS DISCUSSION
(a) Finance Director distributed sheets which set out Council's
suggested Charter amendments to be considered for the November
election. She noted that Legal Counsel has reviewed the
suggested amendments and has submitted a letter of review for
Council consideration. She further asked for Council direction
so that staff might prepare a resolution calling for the
election.
(b) Councilor Scheckla requested a limit be placed on Council/Mayor
positions of eight years consecutive service.
(c) Councilor Brian requested the Charter be amended to address the
issue of how many persons it would take to make a majority
voting at a Council meeting if anyone abstained from voting. He
suggested the amendment to the Charter include the addition of
the words as follows: "present and voting".
(d) City Administrator requested Council consider sending items #3
and #4 in Legal Counsel's memo for the election in November.
(e) Consensus of Council was to have staff prepare the necessary
resolutions to place the following items on the November
election ballot for Charter amendments.
• Item #3 from Legal Counsel's memo
® Item #4 from Legal Counsel's memo
s 8 Year limit on # of terms that can be served by Council
consecutively.
a Wordage added regarding Council voting "present and voting"
23. ORDINANCE No. 82-30 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AMENDING
TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.04.030(c), ESTABLISHMENT
OF FEES AND CREDITING OF FUNDS — PARRS, AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
(a) Director of Public Works reported this ordinance would allow
staff to recover the cost of the cleaning and servicing of
barbecue grates at Cook Park.
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to
adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
24. WATER CONTRACT EXTENSION REQUEST
(a) City Administrator reported that he had received a letter from
City of Portland stating that the Tigard Water District contract
was unacceptable. Since he still has questions regarding the
long term available water supply, he suggested the Council adopt
the resolution presented which would request an extension of the
renewal date in the Portland Water Sales Contract.
PAGE — COUNCIL MINUTES — JUNE 21, 1982
(b) RESOLUTION No. 82-58 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING A SIX-MONTH
EXTENSION TO THE JUNE 25, 1983 RENEWAL DATE IN THE
PORTLAND WATER SALES CONTRACT.
(c) Councilor Brian stated he understood this would keep the City's
options open only until the long term water supply issue could
be settled.
Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
25. OPEN AGENDA.
25.1 RESOLUTION No. 82-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
SUPPORTING THE CIVIC CENTER PROJECT.
(a) Councilor Brian requested Council express their support of the
Civic Center project and note that the development will be
dedicated to the citizens of Tigard not to any one citizen or
group.
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
25.2 Noxious Weeds Report
(a) City Administrator reported the City's policy on handling weed
complaints. If a citizen owns the property, & weeds will not
be cut by resident, a citation will be issued. If the weeds are
on property owned by a person living outside the area, staff
will cut the weeds or have them cut and then place a lien on the
property to cover the cost of the work.
(b) Council expressed concern that the administrative time spent on
issues such as this is still a cost to the City and should be
recovered also.
(c) Finance Director will work in conjunction with Legal Counsel's
office to develop policy statement and process.
25.3 Ratify Tentative Planning Director Appointment
(a) City Administrator requested Council ratify the appointment of
William Monahan as the Planning Director. City Administrator
recapped the process used to test and interview the candidates
and noted that Mr. Monahan tested out first and Jeremy
Coursolle, the current Associate Planner, tested out second from
over 180 candidates. The hire amount will be $31,308 per month
with a 5% merit review scheduled for 6 months which would make
the salary approximately $32,000/year. Administrator noted
$1,000 would be paid toward the moving costs incurred.
t
PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
(b) Councilor Scheckla expressed concern that Council should be
given the option of reviewing the resume' and whether or not to
pay moving fees before the Administrator made an offer to
someone. He felt this action was unjustified.
(c) Discussion followed regarding Administrator's role in hiring
Department Heads, the individual he had selected and the salary
which Mr. Monahan was offered.
(d) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to confirm
the appointment of Bill Monahan as Planning Director at the
salary offered by the Administrator.
Motion approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present,
Councilor Scheckla voting nay.
25.4 Report on Letter by City Administrator to Mr. Petsinger
(a) City Administrator advised Council that this issue is coming
before the Hearings Officer and he would be unable to supply any
information to Council at this time.
25.5 Discussion of 72nd Avenue Traffic Hazard (Request by Councilor
Brian)
(a) Councilor Brian, City Administrator and Director of Public Works
discussed some problems citizens have had with water line
construction on 72nd Avenue. Staff is aware of the problems and
will continue to police the detour issues.
25.6 Ratify TCYS Election Results
(a) Finance Director requested Council certify the election results
from the May 18, 1982 election. She stated the hand count of
ballots had just been completed on the TCYS ballot measure.
Yes votes cast were 1631 - No votes cast were 1633
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to certify
the election results as reported.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
26. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Council recessed into executive session under ORS
192.660 (1)(f) to consider labor relations issues.
RECESS: Executive Session at 11:21 P.M.
RECONVENE: Special Meeting at 11:21 P.M.
�.a d
27. OPEU/TMEA CONTRACT APPROVAL �csyor C ,�iSlZ
(a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by -c -"''- ""' to approve (/
the amendment to the contract for TMEA as presented by
Administrator. (See attached copy)
PAGE 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
Approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor
Brian voting nay.
RECESS: Special Meeting at 11:22 P.M.
RECONVENE: Executive Session at 11:22 P.M.
28. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Council recessed into executive session under ORS
192.660 (1)(e) to consider acquisition of real property.
RECESS: Executive Session at 11:31 P.M.
RECONVENE: Special Meeting at 11:31 P.M.
29. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULING
(a) City Administrator reported that due to various vacation
schedules July 19 and August 9 Council meetings would need to be
cancelled due to a potential lack of quorum.
(b) Concensus of Council was to cancell 7-19 and 8-9 meetings.
30. ADJOURNMENT: 11:34 P.M.
City Recorder
ATTEST:
Mayor
PAGE10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 21, 1982
�s
ATTN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
The attached transcript/is for the Meadows appeal ppeal which is scheduled for
the Council Meeting of May 24 , 1982. We will be send more information
on this issue in your next packet, however , the transcript is rather lengthy
and you may need more time to study it.
•
1
LIBRARY
PUBLICPhone 639-9511
12568 SW Main-Tigard, Or. 97223 Monthly Rcport, May 1982
TO: LIBRARY BOARD
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY LIBRARIP.N
WCCLS Contract, 1982-83: Librarian and Administrative Assistant Joy Martin attended
city nanagers/librarians meeting on May 20, at which tirae final adjustments were made
in the serial levy (_-atract for FY1982-83. Copies have been received by the city for
signature.
WCCLS Proposed Levy, 1983: The professional board of WCCLS is planning for a new serial
levy to go on the ballot in the spring of 1983 to begin July 1, 1984. (Present levy expires
June 30, 1984.) This was discussed at the city managers/librarians meeting on May 20, and
at the WCCLS network meeting on May 27.
There is considerable concern over the formula for dispersing the funds. One point of
concensus seems to be that the total circulation of each city library should be used
rather than the current use of percentage of out-of-town service.
A special committee was appointed to consider the standardization of circulation procedures.
Their report will be presented at a future meeting of the WCCLS professional board. All
libraries are presently doing a five-year budget projection through FY 1986-87. These
figures will be used in planning for the next serial levy.
` Volunteers: Fourteen volunteers worked a total of 152.5 hours, a daily average of 6.3.
Work Indicators: I•lay '82 May '81
Adult Books 5915 5994
Juvenile Books 1945 1899
Interlibrary Loan 90 56
Magazines 488 286
Records/Cassettes 163 150
Other 34 42
TOTAL CIRCULATION 8635 8427
Days of Service 21 21
Average Daily Circulation 411 401
% Increase - Circulation 3% --
Reference/Reader's Advisory 434 437
Materials Added 302 606
Materials Withdrac•m 81 39
Story Hour Attendance (10 75
New Borrowers/Renewals 163/87 202/0
Money Collected:
Fines/14isc. Replacement 5.55
Lost Books 21.00
Donations 5.80
Monthly 'Report, May 1982 - page 2
Youth Service: Primary activity has concerned the planning and organization of materials
for the sum-:er reading program. (A schedule of e-:ents is attached).
Canterbury Day Care has requested a scheduled time to visit the library. This is the
second day care group to use the library on a regular. basis. After the initisl welcome
and orientation, each group is responsible for its own programming, story telling, etc.
Thirty-five new books were added. A donation of 75 paperb cks was added to the collection.
JUNE
JUNE IJTUNE + JULY JULY ULY JULY JULY IAUG. AUGa AUG. IAUG.1
00 co CO u9 to Cil ' r-7 d C4
z
Oc0VOIcn cOI �I C 6 Q I a W N W O ! F -= oU 4J !a) ►+
O, ON ON m01 aE aG aG I O w Z W to ••4 aJ
W .a as as Uy, �, I A W d L1 H q � ��I H .
, W3 vi d vi d cn d I O >+ ( aC w x H O ' U
'v co o d 3 w 13 w 13 w t H I w O H 3 3 3 1 3 ca
o N cin > 3 L O cn O co O N x H f .? u= 3 O cn H 1 O .+ t+ j 41 0 W p,
K1 H y 11 �' N O 1 W Z LL Cs. I v3 �n O vpi
y 11 b O (F.]., d
O C) O . 41
w ctt O d p ~d C:,
O U I Z 6 O CL' x U 11 Qdd d~d I 1 0 p ! 1r o a)
H3 W OO � 3 043 t c�G3 Wd i 6U A U ! U m a 6 0� Tom• co OU
O ` .� 7 H Pi rn
1 O •`T� 1 O �7 cn t1.. a)co
I t�
C4 i
x to O� G 1r I v + ` u 3 OM l d A w En N 2 m T poD
p I O
mO co 1c°., I CO
41 4J1' d B: - . raw � dH � ��, I ¢ o a a CO
cis ,mc m I i 41
� N 1 •U 3n v za O 'U ci I Oo .o J O
t Y 00 00 co H 1-4 w P. o d to ae .-+ d
U o _ t �n •.a o cn .a 3 u r r-4 N
C -.-•. sJ M 3y .-..rl N I > O
41 t 3-i ^ ^ N �o O M O co M .-a O 4.3 H r1 O
cn
li co co
somw l .0 o 0 0 v v I a) �, a, 02 't w Co
.N- a.3 s+ -- E E 6 I .�+ o U' •4 •4 E -4 t "� "4 �' I o m a
i y E-+ u H u I F H •- i H I H V H H H to U =�
N "' T I T cn T I >. T O 0, 'a
y3 m -r1 m .,4 >,.-+ to I >,•-+ >,i T >,
C -" H •rl H ! W A 1+ 1+ r4 -41 H H 0 11 O 0 � F+ 0 N ; ' ✓.-.
ho o d d ! d 0' o o " o L ( y ,o� o
�) 0 1-+ o o j 3 0
cn ci �' 4 $4 I w O u Cn O O 1 ^ 40;. cn O �1 ^ O f cn O � I M cn cn W of
.-. O n O ^ O tU n O G. •• .. .••. .-. ^
r� 1J d 13 ! .• ,O a7 .. p vl O` N O 3G! N O �� O N...- ! cV O y
i o
1-4 M r i N 1 Op I O O ! O O Q v 3T u
.i I O I O O to `. _. O _' O _. O to t� .-] a0i CL
CD C�p W En [2�W�j: O O T O O O 1 O O O j I O I O I u 0 .," u 0 u 0 u 0 •a' a) m
d W a IYa L O a� -� N 1 • 4 cu 41 N S E J✓ CV I � N G N Y+ E N I •E'a N � N t+ E Cq I
Ico
4 cc a) N � Sm-c 3L a) H 14 I E-H 3L i H a v] H a) m H a) ! H tU H a) m H Py Op•E
y+ u 1 0 ++ 5 E +� r o o i 6 E 1 E ' 6 E 8 O
A .a I o H E-c l -4 H F ff H c i 1 s5 F 1�'a H fa-+ sem+ H arc s�H I 0 H 1�H art 3T+ Z U
00 ! 0 N' 0 t0.3 Tw . 4-) >,r' I t+ >- .41 ;,� 0 TW 13 O CO
f
W CWi G N �, T: a >1 >,11 3 I �+ T
•.-1 3v L 1+ H C4 H 3-3 Cn O a Cn $4 cn H O Cn w O y F4 Cn H I Cn 1-+ O Cn u O
O O +'� O O r, O 6 ' ^ O O O I ^ A-3 .. ! 10-3 — 41 W^ s 3 O Ln ts�+. cd'n
A
W ,O a •. I M a 3 u ! O 1J 1 3 n ..+I �7 13 s1 00 Ki
F N En cn ! M En to ..H ' �' Cn N W n N Cn M1 ; a] ^ CLI) I c1] N
1--z 3R1'i 1Si b I m $o ' U
•Ic•K
co 00 O O O O ' H t7
Y9C K IC 0i i •rl -epi .-1 ' U U U
.. dO
I L
#Xie3 d 6+ 13 ..
.KO L+ c0 cd o— i .� .4 ra 3 O 9
H 6PG Q I m �. U)e aica ; Omoxaoa) 4 0uQ a) o
CNcd NuN •p y p` w
od ca co
r23 H 34
O
U Cd
E-4 N H 1+
_ 41
i IEn
C-0 a)
a1
m I a) Op N O 00
a) I I N C 00 p ►1 CLO C,
w 1 1' ..' '3 .4 W OHO 14 Q $4 O «1 i3 I >4
CQ ta -r4 co C13 00
bo
OW 3 $0 ar ~ t+ 00 3 ►: I o G aui o aa)
ai 1u3 a .4 CA. a) r-c a) aL .-c .--3 a o I A 6
Nm a) a r1 1.. a) I r 3 a u .—+ r-+ a, 11 +
o �, 1 1. -Cox .� v ..� 1, p O �. -� . +
p a0 rn ,.O 7, N - p0 7, 00 !-+ �+ 1+ h0 GO' +
N
GO __
CYN
N CO
\rl
,.pca
CIO 1-1 •
G al 4 N
rp
•r4 C: co \ c0 O 41
b P • a' 'P w
i
G O w c
a) u � Lf)
r+ 00 LS
0
❑ o
Q) .-4 �n
W • �
W ol L O
y -4 L9 ci 4 t9. L9 d
'4 0 b 3-+
A z v O
L w
C
T -4 W
y,c W O ?+
a C
d P+
O r4 O
O N b O L9 t9 1i L
E-+ 4J •'a p d
[Y. 4-3
O �' O
O z U
U
S+ tJ
7 W -rid
dtsc �, O
rl M
H -4 W rl �7 rl L9 i9 G d
co C7 a) r-4 41 L
N
T
r4 " w H rA o
o ca
z -j v
0 W
H O C d
W C 4-1 rr p
v =1c 1-4 rn IT
H i ` � 3
W -O QO
{ S
C4 M [z d
Pa
cn O
z w
O
H
E-
Q.Q.
Ems4. x o
Zs o
W r♦ Ln N Ln
Cr N
O =
41 u)
G
N tn-
c6 Ya a)
Wr-
0 cJ
bo O
aOi b W C/3
'bo
W O CO C cn- u
PCI U rf H41 w
d' 00 r-4 $4 b. e-a W O -4T -4 G G
41
w co CO G
W p q w H
Cd
W
o 3 W b a
.i ar -4 u
^ "' c chi •� a
tt,
'-' a o 0 w v 'W4+ py f+ U O C a 1-+O O Cnw w O
ca C: 0W w 41 w W G v i a1 GOJ tj cd w
cU r41 W W i v cV w a) x p aJ p W , G 7.
UcWa ro u N " cb v s+ O U 6 " 4Ja s ana s pd, �' a u H w z a Zl 0 3
Room
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
MAY, 1982
TO: City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
I. Personnel:
The department is up to full strength (29) , and there was no employee
turnover this month.
The average daily department strength was 16.3 as compared to 15.9 of
May, 1981. By division the breakdown is as follows: Administration
1.2; Services Division 4.3; Patrol Division 9.5; and Investigative
Division 1.2.
II. Service Delivery:
The department responded to 525 non-criminal calls for service this
month in contrast to 495 calls in 1981; year-to-date 2,334.
Patrol Division's obligated time was 1,372.7 hours vs. 996.8 non-
obligated hours.
III. Crime:
There were 104 Part I crimes reported this month; only 84 were reported
in May last year. Of the Part I crimes reported, 22 were cleared, or
r 21.1%. The department responded to 60 Part II crimes and 32 were cleared.
There were 51 persons charged this month as compared to 70 for this same
time period last year. Part I crimes increased 23.8% this month over
May of 1981.
The Investigative Division worked 11 active cases this month; and
cleared 10, or 90.9% of the active cases.
The property loss was $76,299.54, and $37,494.51 was recovered, or
49.1%
IV. Traffic:
Patrol Division responded to 36 accidents, of that number 12 were injury.
There were 101 citations issued, as compared to 285 for this same time
period last year. In addition, 51 warnings were given. The enforcement
index was 5.33
V. Police Reserves:
The Reserve Unit worked 213 hours this month assisting the department in
policing the community. The majority of this time was spent out in the
community on patrol and assisting citizens.
See attached monthly report from the Reserves for a complete breakdown
of their activities.
i
VI. Community Relations:
A. On May 25, Chief Adams and Sgt. Martin attended a meeting at the
Summerfield Town Hall. This 2-1/2 hour meeting was to discuss crime
prevention procedures.
B. On May 7, Officer Grisham gave a 1-hour presentation on Marijuana
and You and the Law to 28 seventh graders from Fowler Jr. High.
C. Also on May 7, he contacted 60 sixth graders from Charles r Tigard
School. He gave a 1-hour presentation on Drugs and Student Rights.
D. Officer Grisham also gave the Drugs and You and the Law presentation
to 42 sixth graders from Phil Lewis School. This 1-1/2 hour class was
given on May 10.
E. 12 Blue Jays came to the station on May 12, and Officer Grisham spent
1 hour were them touring the police department, and answering their
questions.
F. On May 18, Officer Grisham went to Mary Woodard School, and spent
an hour with their second graders, assisting with their bicycle registrations.
G. On May 26, a meeting with the National Safety Town committee members
was held in Beaverton, and Officer Grisham spent 3 hours with them.
H. Officer Grisham spent 7 hours at the high school on May 27. He con-
tacted 120 ninth and tenth graders that day, assisting with driver's
education instruction.
VII. Training:
A. Officer Grisham spent 8 hours on May 14, giving computer/ICAP
demonstrations to other police agenices.
B. Chief Adams attended a conference on Managing Stress in Organizations
on May 26. This 8 hour class was sponsored by B.P.S.T. , and was held at
the General Motors Training Center.
CILSM
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT
FOR
MONTH OF May 19 8.
DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL
RAGE
NW4ERICAL STRENGTH DAILYEABSENCE If AVERAGE EFFECZ`IVE S7REhG
End of Same This Same This I Last Same
this Month Month Month Month i Month Month
Month Last Last Last
Year Year
Year
TOTAL PERSONNEL 29 26 12.7 10.1 16.3 18.5 15.9
.MIEF'S OFFICE 3 2 1.8 .8 1.2 2.0 1.2'
?ERVICES DIVIS. 7 .7 2.7 2.7 4.3 4.8 4.3
PATROL DIVISION 16 14 6.5 -°• 10.2 8.
CRAFFIC DIVIS. -------- -----------------
INVEST. SECTION 3 3 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.'S 1.7
FORCE ONE 13 11 6.1 4.2 6.9 8.0 6.8
FORCE T-wo 9 8 3.7 3.3 5.3 5,0 4.7.
FORCE THREE 7 7
CHANGES .IN PERSONNEL DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH
I. Present for duty end of last month 29
This I Same Month
2. Recruited during month p ,Ionth Last Year
FaRm 3. Reinstated during month 0 ! 1. Total number field
officers 16 14
• Total to account for 29
4. Separations from the service: 2. Less Agents Assig-
ned to Investiga t. 0 0
(a) Voluntary resignation 0 3. Average daily abs-
(b) Retirement 0 ences of field off-
(c) Resigned with charges iters owing to:
g pending 0. (a) Vacation, cusp- .
(d) Dropped during probation 0 ension, days off, _
comp.
(e) Dismissed for cause 0 time, etc. 6.4 4.8
(b) Sick & Injured .1 ,4
(f) Killed in line of duty 0 (c) Schools, etc_ .1
(g) Deceased _ p Total average daily
absences 6.5- .5-.3. -
Total separations p
4. Available for duty
S. Present for duty at end of month 29
Page one
TIGARD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Monthly Report
I. Calls for Service: This Month 689 Year to Date 3,215
A. Obligated Time 1,372.7 B. Non-Obligated Time 996.8
II. PART I CRIMES
No. Cleared Arrests
A. Homicide
B. Rape
C. Robbery 3 3 3
D. Assault 11 7 6
E. Burglary 23 1 1
F. Larceny 63 11
G. Auto The f t 4
Totals 104 22 18
III. PART II TOTALS 60 32 33
TOTAL - Part I and II
164 54 51
i
IV. TOTAL PERSONS CHARGED: 51
a. Adult Male 28 C. Juvenile Male 14
;. _ b. Adult Female d. Juvenile Female 2
V. WARRANTS SERVED 51
VI. TOTAL PROPERTY LOSS $ 76,299.54 TOTAL PROPERTY RECOVERED $37,494.51
VII. TRAFFIC
a. Accidents Investigated 36 Injury Accidents 12 Fatal 0
b. Citations: VBR (Speeding) 12 Yield Right of Way 4
Following too Close 4 Red Light 7 Stop Sign 4
Improper Turn 1 Reckless�Driving-2—
Careless
riving3Careless Driving 5 Driving Under the Influence 5
Driving While Suspended 6 Other Hazardous 13
Non-Hazardous 37 Total Hazardous 64
C. Enforcement Index 5.33
d. Traffic Enforcement Totals
Citations: This Month This Year 101 Year to Date 1,233 '
This Month Last Year 285 Last Year to Date 116
Warnings: This Month This Year 51 Year to Date 399
This Month Last Year 53 Last Year to Date 341
NOTE: Part I Crimes (Major Crimes) Clearance Rate 21.17.
- Part II Crimes (Minor Crimes) Clearance Rate 53.3%
........ ....
all a
0111
on
son
OTHER
OTHER
Essig
OTHER
TOTAL
HOURS
' NUMBER 6F DAY-
................................... ..........
N
r
rY c
ae
_.•�4 2
soon so
on
sloolis Ims on
t
� Y on
wool � mus ; mmlmmm
y r
y
� l
f�
Y.%
-
F
i•y
5_T
Z
S
s
_
S i
. al
MONTHLY REPORT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May, 1982
The following projects were acted on by the Planning Commission over the past
month:
CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
ZOA 1-82 Conditional Use Standards
A motion was approved at the May 4th Commission meeting to
refer the Conditional Use Standards and Use Classifications
back to staff to review a matrix, developed by Commissioner
Speaker, and make the changes from it and bring back to a
future Commission meeting.
At the May 18th meeting, a motion was approved to recommend
the City Council approve ZOA 1-82 Conditional Use Standards,
as presented with the change of the word "recreation" to
"entertainment" in Section 18.20.020 of the Single Family
Residential Zones.
SUBDIVISION
S 1-82 Bramble Bend NPO #6
Applicant: JDG Development Company OWNER: Same
P.O. BOX 911
Lake Oswego, Oregon
Request: To subdivide approximately .53 acres into four (4) lots of
approximately 4,600 square feet each in an A-12 zone on
property which has already been developed as two duplexes.
Site Location: 14805-14817 SW 109th Avenue (Washington County Tax Map 2S1
LOAD, tax lots 8803 & 8804)
Action Taken: Approved May 4, 1982 as attached single-family units.
ZONE CHANGE/MINOR LAND PARTITION
ZC 1-82/MLP 2-82 Michael A. Robuck/Kevin M. Forney NPO #3
Applicant: Mitchell A. Robuck/Kevin M. Forney OWNER: Gayla McCreight-Teel
14405 SW Bull Mountain Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Request: A request for a Zone Change for a portion of the property,
from Washington County RU-30 to City of Tigard R-10 and a re-
quest for a Minor Land Partition to create an additional 20,000
sq. ft. lot on the property.
Site Location: 11945 SW Bull Mountain. Road (Washington County Tax Map 2S1
lOBD, tax lot 900, part of) .
Action Taken: Staff noted this request was withdrawn by the applicant.
r
11011319, ffiR91110 MIME
MONTHLY REPORT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 2
i
SITE DESIGN REVIEW
SDR 6-82 Gneral Telephone NPO #1
Applicant: General Telephone of Northwest, Inc. OWNER: Same
8840 SW Burnham Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Request: An appeal by NPO #1 of the Planning Director's approval of a
Site Design Review to an addition to the GTE building.
Site Location: 8840 SW Burnham (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2DB, tax 100) .
Action Taken: Approved May 4, 1982.
MINOR LAND PARTITION
MLP 23-81 Sturgis NPO #1
Applicant: Richard N. Sturgis OWNER: Same
2216 SW Sunset Blvd.
Portland, Oregon
Request: An appeal by NPO #1 of the Planning Director's approval of
a Minor Land Partition to partition 4.8 acres, zoned A 70/80
Multi-Family Home for the Aged into 3 lots; 4.0 acres, .3
acres and .5 acres respectively.
Site Location: 13055 SW Hall Blvd. (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2DS, lot
400) .
Action Taken: Tabled on May 4, 1982 -- To be continued at the June 8th
Commission meeting.
VARIANCE/MINOR LAND PARTITION
V 5-82/MLP 3-82 Storer Metro NPO #6
Applicant: Saxon I OWNER: Same
1 SW Columbia #1200
Portland, Oregon 97258
Request: Approval of a 11,500 square foot variance to allow for a Minor
Land Partition on the existing parcel without the required
lot size area of 40,000 square feet.
Site Location: Generally located on the west side of SW 85th Avenue, just
south of SW Durham Road at 16285 SW 85th Avenue (Washington
County Tax Map 2S1 14A, tax lot 1100) .
Action Taken: Referred at the May 4, 1982 Commission meeting to City Council.
r
MONTHLY REPORT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PAGE 3
VARIANCE
V 3-82 Miller NPO #1
This issue had been postponed.
NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION #3 APPOINTMENTS
Request: A request by various citizens within the NPO #3 area to be
appointed as members of the NPO #3.
Action Taken: Approved May 18, 1982.
The following projects were acted on by the Hearings Officer over the past
month:
VARIANCE
V 4-82 Oregon Education Association NPO #4
Applicant: Oregon Educational Association OWNER: Same
6900 SW Haines Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Request: A request for a variance to the height limit allowed in Title
16 of the Tigard Municipal Code for a freestanding sign.
Site Location: 6900 94 Haines Road (Washington County Tax Map 1S1 36DA, lots
101 and 2300) .
Action Taken: Approved May 27, 1982 with conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE
CU 8-82 Skipper's, Inc. NPO #4
Applicant: Skipper's, Inc. OVZTER: Same
14450 NE 29th Place #200
Bellevue, Washington 98007
Request: Approval of A Conditional Use permit to allow for a restaurant
within a C-5 (Highway Commercial) zone.
Site Location: On the southeast corner of SW Pfaffle Street and SW 78th Avenue
(Washington County Tax Map 1S1 36CD, tax lot 100, part of) .
Action Taken: Approved May 27, 1982 with conditions.
r
MONTHLY REPORT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 4
CU 9-82 Phagans Beauty School NPO #2
Applicant: Phagans Beauty School OWNER: BKN Corp.
12750 SW Pacific Hwy. 10'25 SW Beaverton
Tigard, Oregon 97223 Beaverton, Oregon 97005
Request: For a Conditional Use permit to locate a beauty school in a
C-3 General Commercial Zone.
Site Location: 8820 SW Center (Washington County Tax Map 1S1 35DD, lot 4900)
Action Taken: Approved May 27, 1982 with conditions.
(V 6-82 (Belknap Industries & CU 10-82 (Schoolhouse Antiques) were tabled.)
The following actions were taken by the Planning Director:
SITE DESIGN REVIEW
SDR 4-82 Edwards Professional Center
Applicant: Edwards Industries, Inc.
Request: For a Site Design Review for construction of professional,
medical, dental office condominiums on a 1.46 acre site.
Site Location: 14240 SW Pacific Highway (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 10A,
tax lots 400, 501)
Action Taken: Approved with conditions on May 7, 1982.
SDR 7-82 Judy's Treate Shop
Applicant: Mercury Development Company
Request: For a Site Design Review to allow for additional restaurant
use and covered walkway within the existing shopping area.
Site Location: Within the Greenway Town Center at the southwest corner of
Scholls Ferry Road and SW 121st Avenue. (Washington County
Tax Map 1S1 34B, tax lot 0401)
Action Taken: Approved with conditions on May 28, 1982.
SDR 10-82 John Alexander Burger Boy
Applicant: John D. Alexander
Request: For a Site Design Review of an addition to the existing Burger
Boy Restaurant.
Site Location: 11688 SW Pacific Highway (Washington County 1S1 36CD, tax lot
1900)
Action Taken: Approved with conditions on May 4, 1982.
MEMO
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BUILDING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMITS FOR MONTH OF MAY, 1982
May's building activity included 6 signs, 6 single family residential, 7
residential alter and repair, 2 commercial alter and repair for a total
valuation of $506,910.00
Fees for 14 building permits $4,616.34
Fees for 6 sign permits 135.00
Plumbing Activity - 18 1 ,290.00
Mechanical Activity - 15 302.63
Business Licenses - 43 1,456.00
TOTAL - - - - 7,799.97
Sewer Permits - 7 4,950.00
Sewer Inspections - 7 245.00
f
t
King City activity included 1 residential alter and repair for a total
valuation of $20,000.00 and fees of $140.50 and one commercial remodel for
a total valuation of $2,500.00 and fees of $78.93.
June 18, 1982
ml�=Jjjl
TIGARD BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY - MAY, 1982
contractor address valuation
Sam Gotter Construction 15210 S.W. Gentle Woods Court residential $ 78,400.
Sam Gotter Construction 15200 S.W. Gentle Woods Court residential 67,900
Jay Miller 16335 S.W. Greenland Drive residential 79,700
Gary Bidiman 15080 S.W. 89th Place residential 60,200
Jim Hodgson 10245 S.W. Serena Way residential 77;700
Alternative Development Co. 9775 S.W. Cook Court residential 57,000
Reg Jestus 14270 S.W. 100th Avenue residential a/r 13,000
Doug & Nancy Martell 13730 S.W. Fairview Court residential a/r 21,000
Walter Nutting 10595 S.W. Century Oak Drive residential a/r 5,000
Cecil Jones 12190 S.W. 69th Avenue residential a/r 11,000
Ralph Severson 10345 S.W. Highland Drive residential a/r 4,350
Robert Stimler 11525 S.W. Terrace Trails Drive residential a/r
Steve T. Nitsog 8465 S.W. Hunziker Street residential a/r 8,500
Koll Intereal 10220 S.W. Nimbus Avenue commercial a/r 16,590
Portland Fixture 12278 S.W. Scholls Ferry Road commercial a/r 1,500
$501,840
TOTAL FOR MONTH OF MAY, 1982 - - - - - - - - - -
SIGN PERMITS - MAY, 1982
Susan Cain 860 S.W. Center Court $ ---
Clark Sign 10655 S.W. Greenburg 1,200
Darci J. Duffy 10110 S.W. Nimbus Avenue 1,770
Heath Northwesr Inc 11634 S.W. Pacific Hwy 1,000
Heath Northwest Inc 11634 S.W. Pacific Hwy 500
Sign Craft 12442 S.W. Main Street 600
TOTAL FOR MAY - - - - - - - - - - - 5,070
KING CITY PERMITS - MAY, 1982
A. Rice, D. Enden, C. McPherson 12035 S.W. Imperial, 12044 S.W. King 20,000
Arthur Court #B & #D
Leon Stratton 9570 S.W. Barbur 2,500
L
CITY OF TIGARD ,I
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
as of _MAY, 1982
Combined Federal State County Major St Park & Bond
ASSETS Special General General
(Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec Sinking Sewer Assess Fixed Long-Term
Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Assets Debt Fund
Cash (248,335) ( 42,493)
Unem Insurance 125 (205,967)
P• 32,017 32,017
Lib. Bldg. Fund -0-
Time CD's 1,608,195 158,047 44,029 15,378 398,838 727,139 56,304
208,460
Invest. Local Pool 196,064 (50,408) 222 12,591 15,140 21,573 13,021 11,966 171,959
Prop. Tax Rec. 37,197 37,197
Contract Rec. USA 265,019 144,425
Other Receivables 250,781 4,275 120,594
Bond/Unhond Rec. 406,145
44,712 201,794
Gas Inventory 4,640 4,640
406,146
Accrued Int. Rec.
Due Fr. Other Fds.. 10,967 10,967
Fixed Assets
Land & Imprvmts. 369,060
Bldg. & Imprvmts. 656,286
2,484 366,576
Sewer System 1,939,796
36,635 619,651
Office Equipment 123,716 1,939,796
Other Equipment 297,295 6,596 117,120
Auto & Trucks 113,655
53,866 243,429
Street Imprvmts.
113,655
Library Books 131,336
Const. in Prog. 131,336
Amt. Avail- Debt 28,548
Amt. Provided for 23,548
Debt Service 29.336 57,884
6,251,719 298,667 222 56,620 30,518 420,411 740,160 68,270 -0- 2,376,767
767 668,317 1,591,767 -0-
CITY OF TIGARD ° {
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
` as of -ML-1 982 „rr
Combined Federal State County Major St Park & Bond Special Gere.ral General
LIABILITIES (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec Sinking Sewer Assess Fixed Long-Tcrm
Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Assets Debt Fund
Accts Payable . 91,232 11,164 80,068
Accrued Int Payable 702 702
PR & Accr. PR Taxes 429 429
Due to Other Funds 10,967 10,967
Deposits Held 121,039 36,419 84,620
Deferred Credit
Bonds Payable 529,795 529,795
Warrants Payable 670,312 670,312
RESERVES/FD BAL.
Res. for Taxes,
Cont., Other Rec. 213,621 181,621 32,000
Inv-Fixed Assets 1,379,928 . (7,687) 1,387,615
Contributions 2,640,301 2,436,149 204,152
Fund Balance 1,193,808 226,083 27,797 15,668 8,822 6,053 753,699 59,536 96,150
Retain Earning
Current Yr. (226,825) (226,825)
Current Year Rev.
Over (Under) Exp. (373,590) (157,049) (38,542) 40,952 21,696 414,358 (13,539) 8,734 10,442 (660,642
6,251,719 298,667 222 56,620 30j518 420,411 740.160 68,270 2,376,767 668.317 1.591,767
CITY OF TIGARD
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR THi. _ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED MAY, 1982
Remain- Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
REVENUES ing Budgeted (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec. Sinking Sewer Assess.
Balance 1981-82 Only) Fund Sharin, Street Fund - Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund M
300 - TAXES
301 Property 89,301 528,078 438,777 438,777
Loaves & Fishes 1,544 10,000 8,456 8,456
TCY's 9,317 66,383 57,066 57,066
Bike Path Levy 16,461 93,300 76,839 76,839
302 Prior Years 8,387 20,000 11,613 11,613
309 Other 99 100 1 1
310 - FROM OTHER AGENCIES
311 State Gas Tax 40,228 203,550 163,322 163,322
312 Cigarette Tax 8,024 38,150 30,126 30,126
313 Liquor Tax 32,268 136,650 104,382 104,382
314 State Rev. Sharing 4,797 103,979 99,182 99,182
315 County Rd. Levy 16,408 75,600 59,192 59,192
316 Hotel/Motel Tax 2,677 30,146 27,469 27,469
317 Fed. Rev. Sharing 34,850 120,060 85,210 85,210
318 FRS-HUD dw/tw -0- 20,000 20,000 20,000
318.2 FRS-HUD Sr. Ctr. 21,226 21,457 231 231
318.4 FRS-Arch. Barrier
Removal 46,250 46,250
319.1 State Subv. LCDC -0- 7,662 7,662 7,662
321 Co. Subv. USA ( 1) 22,385 22,386 22,386
312 Co. Subv. Library ( Iii) 74,510 74,524 74,524
323 Co. Maint. Rep. Tax 18,913 495,365 476,452 476,452
329 Other - Library ( 2,063) -0- 2,063 2,063
CITY OF TIGARD
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR THE ELEVRN MONTHS ENDED MyA 1 g_ 82
Remain- Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
ing Budgeted (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec. Sinking Sesser Assesa.
Balance 1981-82 Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
330 - Lic. & Permits ----
331 Business Lic. 16,947 66,000 49,053 _ 49,053
332 Plumb/Heat/Meeh. 2,557 25,000 22,443 22,443
333 Building 49,278 143,000 93,722 93,722
339 Others 1,389 6,040 4,651 4,651
340 - Fines/Forft/Penalty
341 Ct Fines/Forft/Def. 11,051 59,400 48,349 48,349
350 - Use of Monies
351 Int, on Investments
General Fund 26,176 49,000 22,824 22,824
Sewer Fund 761 20,016 19,255
19,255
State Tax Street 1,154 6,000 4,846 4,846
Road Fund 288 1,900 1,612 1,612
Co. Rd. Rep/Maint. 7,841 26,250 18,409 18,409
Federal Rev. Sharing 28:) 300 581 581
Major Streets (35,975) 52,000 87,975 87,975
Park & Recreation ( 4,425) 2,500 6,925 6,925
Special Assess. Fd.( 2,240) 17,000 19,240 19,240
Bond Sinking Fund -0-
352 Interest on Assess. 1,471 19,135 17,664 17,664
359 Other ( 1,009) -0- 1,009 •1,009
CITY OF TIGARD
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR THE ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED MAY, 1982
Remain- Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
ing Budgeted (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec. Sinking Server Assess.
Balance 1981-82 Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
360-Chgs Current Svcs
361.1 Subd St Light 6,562 14,500 7,938 7,938
361 Subd Application' 3,030 6,000 2,970 2,970
362 Zoning Adjustments 3,791 17,000 13,209 13,209
363 Sewer Connection 55,385 95,300 39,915
39,915
364 Monthly Svc Charge ( 4,541) 300,190 304,731
304,731
365 Svc Permit Inspect 2,814 10,450 7,636 7,636
365.2 PW General Fund 19,569 40,000 20,431 20,431
366 System Dev Chg 71,370 140,140 68,770 68,770
367 Parks 111 3,200 8,800 5,600 5,600
368 Parks 112 2,870 12,850 9,980 9,980
369 Other 1,508 10,500 8,992 8,992
380-Franchise Revenue
381 PGE (14,608) 200,000 214,608 214,608
382 NW Natural Gas 4,923 63,750 58,827 58,827
383 General Tel ( 2,104) 84,000 86,104 86,104
384 Garbage 7,295 29,000 21,705 21,705
389 Other ( 248) 2,000 2,248 2,248
390-Nonrevenue Receipts
391 Donations/Gifts ( 1,126) 4,000 5,126 5,126
399 Other ( 3,281) 500 3,781 3,781
Sale of Land 36,400 36,400
CITY OF TIGARD
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR THE ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED MAY, 1981
Remain- Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
ing Budgeted (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec. Sinking Sewer Assess.
Balance 1981-82 Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
400 - RECOVERED EXP.
401 Transfers (913,974) -0- 913,974 913,974
401.1 Bancroft/LID
Transfers ( 36,591) 38,813 75,404 75,404
LID Overhead/Admin. 5,369 5,369
LID Engineering 39,187 39,187
402 Other Recover. Exp 27,433 32,900 5,467 5,467
403 Collect on USA
Contract -0- 10,213 10,213 10,213
405 Collect on Assess. 4,116 62,000 57,884 57,884
TOTAL REVENUES (257,996) 3,871,028 4129,024 2,588,208 85,791 168,168 60,804 494,861 156,745 22.505 10,213 371,537 170,199
FUND BALANCE
General Fund 322,154 322,154
Sewer Fund 171,388 171,388
State Tax Street 13,669 13,669
Road Fund 15,762 15,762
Federal Rev. Sharing 26,530 26,530
Major Streets 749,394 749,394
Park & Recreation 50,819 50,819
Special Assesments 64,518 64,518
Bond Sinking Fund -0- -0-
Assess. Receivable -0- -0-
GRAND TOTAL REVENUE1,156,238 5,285,262 4,129,024 2,588,208 85,791 168,168 60,804 494,861 156,745 22,505 10,213 371,537 170,192
CITY OF TIGARD
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR THE ELk N MONTHS ENDED MAY, 1982
Remain- Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond
Special
ing Budgeted (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec. Sinking Sewer Assess,
Balance 1931-82 Only) Fund
OPERATING & CAP EXP -
SharinpL Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund ''Fund Fund
1.1 Police 164,931 1,035,368 870,437 870,437
1.2 & 2.1 Pub Works 927,920 1,734,459 806,539 806,539
1.3 Municipal Court 4,233 37,461 33,228 33,228
1.4 Planning 20,931 94,896 73,965 73,965
1.5 Building 22,844 127,998 105,154 105,154
3.1 Libraryt
13,190 136,000 122,810 122,810
3.3 Aged Services 1,530 10,000 8,470 8,470
3.4 Youth Services 9,184 66,383 57,199 57,199
4.1 Mayor/Council 3,632 16,902 13,270 13,270
4.2 City Admin. 9,474 103,000 93,526 93,526
4.3 Fiscal Admin. 19,541 168,500 148,959 148,959
5.1 Nondepartmental 32,426 350,000 317,574 317,574
Contingency
General 119,316 119,316
Sewer 29,985 29,985
State Tax St 14,487 14,487
Fed Rev Shr 16,956 16,956
Major Street 92,555 92,555
Parks #1 4,218 4,218
Parks #2 3,280 3,280
Road Fund 7,717
7,717
Co Rd Maint 26,303 26,303
6. Capital Budget 54,527 916,612 862,085 94,126
�^ 2,336 765,623
1,5999180 5,112,3963,513,2162,745,257
2,336 765,623
CITY OF TIGARD
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
FOR THE ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED MAY, 1982
Remain- Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
ing Budgeted (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap Proj Rec. Sinking Sewer Assess.
Balance 1981-82 Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
OTHER EXPENDITURES
PB trans to Gen Fd (913,974) 913,974 124,333 127,216 39,108 80,503 170,284 13,771 358,759
Other trans to GF
Trans to Other Fds
Use of Money/Prop.
Interest Exp. ( 14,076) 19,348 33,424 213 33,211
Pmt-Bond Princ. 30,000 72,000 42,000 10,000 32,000
Unapprop Fund Bal 81,518 81,518
Total Other Exp (816,532) 172,866 989,398 124,333 127,216_ 39,108 80,503 170,284 13,771 10,213 358,759 65,211
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 782,648 5,285,262 4,502,6142,745,257 124,333 127,216 39,108 80,503 170,284 13,771 10,213 361,095 830,834
Current Year Rev.
Over (Under) Exp. (373j590)(157,049) (38,542) 40,952 21,696 414,358 (13,539) 8,734 -0- 10,442 (660,642)
r— COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDIrTR.ES
FOR THE MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 1982
Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
REVENUES (Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap. Proj Rec Sinking Sewer Assess.
Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
300 — TAXES
301 Property Taxes 6,570 6,570
Loaves & Fishes
TCY's
302 Prior Years
I
309 Others
310 — FROM OTHER AGENCIES
311 State Gas Tax 15,253 15,253
312 Cigarette Tax 3,685 3,685
313 Liquor. Tax 10,301 10,301
314 State Revenue Sh. 21,647 21,647
315 County Road Levy 5,859 5,859
316 Hotel/Motel Tax
318 Federal Rev. Sh.
319.1 State Sub — LCDC
319.2 Fed. Sub. — Sr. Cit. Ctr.
321 County Sub. — USA
322 County Sub. — Library
323 County Maintenance — Repair Tax 5,327 5,327
329 Other — Library
330 — LICENSES & PERMITS
331 Bus. Licenses 1,456 1,456
332 Plmbg, Heat, Mech. Permits 1,593 1,593
333 Bldg. Permits 4,931 4,931
339 Others 149 149
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITITRES
FOR THE MONTH ENDED May 31, 1982
Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond,. Special
(Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap. Proj_ Rec Sinking Sewer Assess.
0- nly) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
340 - FINES, FORFEITURES & PENALTIES
341 Court Fines, Forfeit, IDD 5,933 5,933
350 - USE OF MONIES
351 Int. on Invest. - Gen. Fd. 3,812 3,812
Sewer Fund 3,677 3,677
State Tax Street 1,057 1,057
Road Fund 335 335
County Rd. Rep. & Maint. 4,585 4,585
Federal Rev. Sh. 25 25
Major Streets 7,773 7,773
Park & Rec. 116 116
Special Assesments 812
Bond Sinking Fund 812
352 Int. on Assessments 1,445
359 Other 1,009 1,009 1,445
360 - CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
361.1 Subd. Street Light 629 629
361 Subd. Application 150 150
362 Zoning Application 3,505 3,505
363 Sewer Connection 990
940
364 Sewer Service 29,660
29,660
365 Sewer Permit Inspect. 147
365.2 Public Works Gen. Fd. 147
366 System Dev. Charge 2,400
2,400
367 Parks 111
368 Parks 112 600 600
369 Others 711 711
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDI7""^ES
FOR THE MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 1982
Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond Special
(Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap. Proj Rec Sinking Sewer Assess.
Only) Fund Sharing Street _Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
380 - FRANCHISE REVENUE
381 PGE
382 NW Natural Gas
383 General Telephone
384 Garbage
389 Others
390 - NONREVENUE RECEIPTS
391 Donations/Gifts 18 18
399 Others 25 25
Sale of Land
400 - RECOVERED EXPENDITURES
401 Transfers 91,497 91,497
401.1 Bancroft Transfers
Overhead
Administration
Engineering
402 Other Recovered Exp. 7,059 149
6,910
403 Collect on USA Contract
TOTAL REVENUES 244,741 157,770 25 16,310 6,194 9,912 10,173 716 -0- 34,474 9,167
C014BINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDIP ^ES
FOR THE MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 1982
Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond. Special
(Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap. Proj Rec Sinking Sewer Assess.
Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
OPERATING & CAPITAL EXPENSES
1.1 Police 71,595 71,595
1.2 & 2.1 Public works 144,447 144,447
1.3 Municipal Court 3,061 3,061
1.4 Planning 7,822 7,822
1.5 Building 9,083 9,083
3.1 Library 9,993 9,993
3.3 Aged Services -0- -0-
3.4 Youth Services -0- -0-
4.1 Mayor & Council 2,106 2,106
4.2 City Administration 12,464 12,464
4.3 Fiscal Administration 14,912 14,912
5.1 Non-Departmental 45,557 45,557
Contingency
General
Sewer
State Tax Street
Federal Rev, Sharing
Major Streets
Parks Ili
Parks #2
Road Fund
County'Road Repair
Debt Service
6. Capital Budget 58,265 834 2,336 55,095
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDIT' 7,,S
FOR THE MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 1982
Combined Federal State County Major St. Park & Bond. Special
(Memo General Revenue Tax Road Road Cap. Proj Rec Sinking Sewer Assess.
Only) Fund Sharing Street Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund
OTHER EXPENDITURES
PB Transfers to Gen. Fd. 91,497 8,148 16,060 5,110 57,555 (24,667) 936 -0- 28,355
Other Transfers to Gen. Fd.
Transfers to Other Funds
Use of Money & Property
Interest Expense 4,972 4,972
Payment of Bond Principle 15,000 15,000
Total Other Expenditures 111.469 8.148 16.060 5.110 57.555 (24,667) 936 2_ 8.355 19,972
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 490,774 321,874 89148 169060 5,110 57,555 (24,667) 936 -0- 30,691 75,067
Current Year Revenue
Over (Under) Expenditures (246,033) (164,104) ( 8,123) 7.50 1,084 (47,643) 34,840 ( 220) -0- 3,783 (65,900)
II
UA'fEw MAY, 1982 CITY OF TIGARD
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
EXPENDITURES - OPERATIONAL BUDGET
1. C01M, LAITY PROTECTION 1981-82 Budget
Current Month Year-to-Date
Police Services 1.1
1.1.1 Patrol 605,460 40,560 512,939
1.1.2 Investigation 122,548 9,757 101,355
1.1.3 Communication 167,326 12,679 134,799
1.1.4 Administration. 140.034 8,599 121,344
TOTAL 1,035,368 71,595 870,437
Public Works 1.2
1.2.1 Street Lighting 89,000 9,489 89,096
1.2.2 Signals/Signs/Markings 35,925 2,493 32,867
1.2.3 Engineering 168,445 20,120 133,502
1.2.4 Admin. & Clerical 4i,560 3,266 38,720
TOTAL 334,930 35,368 294,185
Municipal Court 1.3
1.3.1 Arraignments & Trials 31,461 3,061 33,228
Planning & Zoning 1.4
1.4.1 Current Planning 85,729 5,002 59,327
1.4.2 Advance Planning 9,167 2,820 14,638
TOTAL 94,896 7,822 73,965
Bldg. Inspect. & Enforcement 1.5
1.5.1 Plan Checking 33,255 2,596 29,147
1.5.2 Field Inspection 64,109 4,116 48,293
1.5.3 Support Services 14,159 1,040 13,004
1.5.4 Program Administration 16,475 1,331 14,710
TOTAL 127,998 9.083 105.154
R
Ili f
DATE MAY, 1982 CITY OF TIGARD
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
EXPENDITURES - OPERATIONAL BUDGET
1981-82 Budget Current Month Year-to-Date
2. HOME AND COMMUNITY QUALITY
Public Works 2.1
2.1.2 Sanitary Service 234,812 5,452 104,821
2.1.3 Streets & Roads 772,993 80,212 141,571
2.1.4 Parks 137,839 6,496 81,556
2.1.5 Storm Water Control 49,418 3,595 36,795
2.1.6 Special Projects 16,049 1,796 14,507
2.1.7 Ancillary Service 48,858 3,874 39,673
2.1.8 Engineering 94,565+15,000 =109,565 5,003 66,769
2.1.9 Admin. & Clerical 32,495 2,651 25,829
2.1.11 Insect Control 12,500 833
TOTAL 1,399,529+15,000 =1,414,529 109,079 512,354
3. SOCIAL SERVICES
Library 3.1
3.1.1 Technical Services 36,497 + 4,000= 40,497 2,569 32,634
3.1.2 Community Services 78,990 - 1,409= 77,581 5,896 74,439
3.1.3 Operations & Maint. 3,272 105 1,750
3.1.4 Administration 14,650 1,423 13,987
TOTAL 133,409 + 2,591 = 136,000 9,993 122,810
Youth & Aged Services
3.3.1 Loaves & Fishes 10,000 -0- 8,470
3.4.1 Youth Services 66,383 -0- 57,199
TOTAL 76,383 -0- 65,669
DATE MAY, 1982 CITY OF TIGARD
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
EXPENDITURES - OPERATIONAL BUDGET
1981-82 Budget Current Month Year-to-Date
4. POLICE AND ADMINISTRATION
Mayor & Council 4.1
4.1.1 Policy & Direction 16,902 2,106 13,270
City Administration 4.2
4.2.1 Management Functions 50,502 +17,700 = 68,202 7,976 57,861
4.2.2 Staff Functions 27,571 + 2,119 = 29,690 3,898 32,314
4.2.3 Ancillary Functions 5,099 + 9 = 5,108 590 3,351
TOTAL 83,172 +19,828 =103,000 12,464 93,526
Fiscal Administration 4.3
4.3.1 Finance Program 105,561 + 2,208 =107,769 8,012 95,604
4.3.2 City Records 37,309 +11,116 = 48,425 5,872 42,091
4.3.3 Management Support 12,306 1,028 119264
TOTAL 155,176 + 13,324 =168,500 14,912 148,959
tl
DATE MAY, 1982
CITY OP' '1IGAltD
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
EXPENDITURES - OPERATIONAL BUDGET
5. CITY-WIDE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1981-82 Budget Current Month Year-to-Date
Non-Departmental Functions 5.1
5.1.1 Legal Services 30,000 + 65,000 = 95,000 8,964 71,575
5.1.2 Insurance 44,475 - 15,000 = 29,475 2,668 23,383
5.1.3 Utilities 44,000 + 3,000 = 47,000 3,389 41,523
5.1.4 Rent 27,925 + 12,075 - 40,000 9,098 41,106
5.1.5 Postage 9,000 - 1,500 = 7,500 5,201 9,280
5.1.6 Audit 9,500
9,660
5.1.7 Membership 10,627 + 1,325 = 11,952 11,952
5.1.8 Codification of Ordina- ,s 2,500 + 1,500 = 4,000 815 2,489
5.1.9 Stationery & Supplies 4,000 + 3,321 = 7,321 1,128 4,458
5.1.10 Bldg. & Equip. Maint./Rep. 8,275 366 6,243
5.1.11 Contractual Services 39,532 F 10,468 = 50,000 11,493 61,582
5.1.12 Unemployment Reserve 2,000 -0- 1,794
5.1.13 Donations 2,000 -0- -0-
5.1.14 Publicity & Comm. Relations 7,000 5 180
5.1.15 Materials & Supplies 1,000 + 1,000 = 2,000 5,924
5.1.16 Printing 1,500 + 2,000 = 3,500 1,433 5,144
5.1.17 Office Equipment 6,700 + 6,500 = 13,200 900 12,912
5.1.18 Unclassified Personnel 10,752 - 4,475 = 6,277 5,535
5.1.19 Contingency 438,274 -138,457 =299,817 -0-
5.1.20 Elections 1,500 + 2,500 = 4,000 97 2,834
TOTAL 700,560 - 50,743 =649,817 45,557 317,574
DATE MAY, 1982 '' CITY OF TIGARD
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
EXPENDITURES - OPERATIONAL BUDGET
6. COMMUNITY PROTECTION 1981-82 Budget Current Month Year-to-Date
Home & Community Quality 6.2
6.2.1.3(7) Rd. Acq. & Development 692060 38,883
6.2.1.4(3) Parks Acq. & Develop. 111 36,965 3,535
Parks Acq. & Develop. 112 28,518 682 8,368
6.2.1.5 Storm Drainage 28,299 -0-
TOTAL 786,742 682 50,786
Divisions 6.5
6.5.1.13(1) Donations 2,000 1
6.5.1 Bldg. Improvement 79,120 43,188
6.5.1.000 Architectural Barrier 48,750 152 152
TOTAL 129,870 152 43,340
7. DEBT SERVICE
7.1 General Obligation Bonds 10,000 10,000
7.1.1 Gen. Oblig. Bonds Interest 213 213
TOTAL 10,213 10,213
7.2 Bancroft Improvement Bonds 62,000 15,000 32,000
7.2.1 Bancroft Imp. Bonds Interest 19,135 4,973 33,212
Unappropriated Fund Balance 81,518
TOTAL 162,653 19,973 65,212
GRAND TOTAL 5,285,252_ ��i n4.—? 20,692
MEMO
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BUILDING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMITS FOR MONTH OF APRIL, 1982
April's building activity included 4 signs, 7 single family residential,
1 residential alter and repair, 9 commercial alter and repair and 1
miscellaneous for a total valuation of $739,654.00.
Fees for 18 permits $6,228.68
Fees for 4 signs 70.00
Plumbing Activity - 24 1,599.10
Mechanical Activity - 21 402.00
Business Licenses - 140 4,731.00
TOTAL - - - $13,030.78
Sewer Permits - 10 $16,100.00
Sewer Inspections - 10 360.
King City activity included 1 residential alter and repair for a total
valuation of $4,700.00 and fees of $83.33.
May 17, 1982
mom=
TIGARD BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY - APRIL,_ 1982
contractor address type valuation .
Dominic Development Co. 8930 SW Reiling Street' residential $ 59,600.
Michael Phillips 11550 SW Cloud Court residential 105,000.
Tom Elliott 13805 SW Cowles Court residential 57,000.
Jay Miller, Builder 12357 SW Duchilly Court residential 159,600.
Wardin & Westlund 8785 SW Reiling Street residential 57,000.
Dominic Development Co. 15145 SW 88th Avenue residential 57,000.
Tital Properties 8280 SW Colony Creek Court residential 46,400.
H. G. Mertlich 11225 SW Fairhaven Street residential a/r 5,000.
Roy L. Pyle 10330 SW Meadow Street residential a/r 9,700.
Mr. Linschoten 16120 SW Grimson Court residential a/r 3,500.
Wayne & Terry Johnson 8710 SW Reiling Street residential a/r 15,000.
Portland Fixture Co. 12288 SW Scholls Ferry Road commercial a/r 25,000.
Hampton Oaks Office Park Assoc. 6645 SW Hampton Street commercial a/r 72,000.
Pactrust 16416 SW 72nd Avenue - Bldg. 5 commercial a/r 7,000.
Koll Intereal 10170 SW Nimbus Avenue commercial a/r 3,546.
Morvue, Inc. 10520 SW Cascade Blvd. commercial a/r 3,000.
Koll Intereal 10240 SW Nimbus Avenue commercial a/r 15,000.
Ray Kittleson 8820 SW Center Street commercial a/r 30,000.
Fotomat Corp 12130 SW Scholls Ferry Road commercial a/r 3,500.
Tigard Cycle & Ski 12551 SW Main Street commercial a/r 1,500.
Safeway Stores, Inc. 41205 Tigard Plaza commercial a/r 1,500.
TOTAL FOR MONTH OF APRIL, 1982 - - - $736,846.
SIGN PERMITS - APRIL. 1982
Octopus Graphics 9735 SW Shady Lane $ 658.
Lancaster Sign Co. 12559 SW Main Street 900.
CMR Sign & Lighting 14407 SW Pacific Highway 800.
Ken Paulsen 7900 SW Bonita Road 450.
W. J. Gregorius 16555 SW Matador Lane
TOTAL FOR APRIL, 1982 - - $ 2808.
KING CITY PERMITS - APRIL, 1982
W. J. Gregorius 16555 SW Matador Lane $4,700.
t
AW
P' D
VOLUME IV ISSUE 5 MAY 17, 1982
PERSONNEL NOTES
*The Budget Committee has lifted the freeze on the position of Planning Director. Appli-
cations are now being taken, with the deadline for applying to be May 28th. Under the
leadership of the new Planning Director, the Department of Planning and Development will
combine the functions of planning and the Building Department, as well as encompass the
areas of economic development and urban renewal.
*Debbie Goodman is working 20 hours per week at the Library on a CETA job-training place-
ment. This is a three-month placement, and Debbie will learn filing; and other genera]
clerical skills.
*Beth Blount has signed a professional services contract to serve as the City's Hearings
Officer. She is an attorney and has been Hearings Officer with the City of Beaverton
and other jurisdictions. Ms. Blount will consider requests for variances, conditional
use permits and other zoning matters in order to free the Planning Commission for work
on comprehensive planning and policy development.
*Joey, a 15 month-old German shepherd, was recently "hired" by the Tigard Police Depart-
ment. Joey and his handler, Officer Darwin DeVeny, began a four to five month trai:-�ng
period in late April with the Mt. Angel Police Department. When training has been com-
pleted, Joey will assist in tracking and search operations and with some narcoti,.s work.
*Mel Walker has been rehired from lay-off as a seasonal parks maintenance worker. This
temporary, part-time position (three days per week) is expected to continue for approxi-
mately five months.
TRAINING ACTIVITIES
*Linda Sargent and Bob Jean attended a workshop on Impasse Resolution sponsored by the
Local Government Personnel Institute on May 6 in Beaverton.
*Randy Clarno, Survey Section Crew Chief, participated in "Retracement Surveying Seminar"
on May 7 and 8 sponsored by the Land Surveyors Assn. of Washington and Oregon at Jantzen
Beach.
*Familiar faces are now in new places as Lowana Murray, Penny Liebertz, Patt Martin, and
Diane Jelderks have assumed their new duties at City Hall. A great deal of training and
cross-training is in progress as these staff members learn their new responsibilities.
eThe City now has the capacity to organize and run its own assessment centers because of
the experience gained by Linda Sargent in putting together and handling the recent assess-
ment center for the selection of a Telecommunications Administrator for MACC.
*Doris Hartig, Bob Jean, Joy Martin and Mary Strickland attended a Governmental Seminar, in
Accounting and Finance sponsored by Coopers & Lybrand on May 11.
OTHER NEWS AND NOTES
*Congratulations to Council President John Cook on his selection as Tigard's First Citizen
of 1982! Mr. Cook was named at the Chamber of Commerce's "First Nighter" Banquet on
May 8th.
*Volunteers Margaret Earl and Dolores Edwards will staff the voter registration desk to
be open at Tigard City Hall on May 13, 14, 17, and 18.
*Conversations have been held recently with the Chamber of Commerce regarding the role
of the Tigard Water District and long-term water resources planning, with some suggestion
that the City might consider getting into the water business.
*The Civic Center Executive Committee has completed its final report for the City Council,
which passed a resolution in support of the $4.6 million project. It is now up to the
voters to decide on the future of the Civic Center at the special election to be held
on June 29th. If approved, the project would add approximately $24-$30 annually per
household in taxes.
(over)
-2-
*Recent visitors to City Hall were third graders from C.F. Tigard Elementary School. The
students had just finished a unit on local government. Tour guide Liz Newton gave the
visitors the -"grand tour". According to thank-you letters received by Liz, the photo-
copier made a great impression on the children! Stop by and read a selection of these
letters, which are posted above the copier (where else?) on the first floor at City Hall.
*Library volunteers contributed a total of 141.5 hours in May for a daily average of 5.4
hours. Three cheers for the volunteers!
*A vacancy will exist on the Library Board as of July 1, 1982. Jean Carlisle's term ex-
pires then, and she has decided not to seek reappointment. Sincere thanks to Jean for
her years of service to the Library.
*A terminal for the data processing system has arrived, and data for the engineering
program is now being entered by Pat Robertson. The remainder of the word processing/
data processing equipment is due to arrive around June 1.
*Registration will begin on June 16 for the "Rainbow Reading Game", the Library's summer
reading program for children. Check with the Library for details.
®The issue of double taxation was discussed by City Administrator Bob Jean at a recent
meeting of the Chamber of Commerce's Public Affairs Committee.
*Overall circulation at the Tigard Library is up by 9% over circulation in April, 1981.
•Chief of Police Robert Adams was on vacation from April 28 - May 10. Chief Adams and
his wife attended their son's wedding in Idaho.
*Building Official Ed Walden began his vacation on May 10 and will continue through May 21 .
*Bob Jean has scheduled some time off from May 26 through June 11.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS
*Bob Jean attended a meeting on May 11 concerning the issue of solid waste transfer held
by the Metro Service District.
*The meeting of the Washington County Public Officials Caucus on May 6th at the Tigard
Senior Center was well attended by local elected officials. The general topic of urbani
zation was discussed with special emphasis on the issue of double taxation.
*Administrative Assistant Joy Martin will attend the meeting of the Washington County
Cooperative Library Services on May 20th at the WCCLS office in Aloha.
TO: City Administrator/City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Durham Road Traffic Count
Sir: -
In trying to locate a traffic counter that would count heavy truck
traffic, it was found the only agency that has this equipment is
Washington County Road Department. State Highway Division and
other local jurisdictions do not have any of these traffic counters.
f
Due to the purchase price of $3000 per counter, it was decided to
use Washington County's when it is available in six weeks, as they
€{ are currently doing studies in the county.
i
A study was done in October on the Durham Corridor, and it was found
the times of heaviest volume was 10 a.m. to noon, and 4 p.m. to 5 p.m.
:With this information, the police department has fielded monitoring
units out from times of 10 a.m. to 1 P.M. and 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
The monitoring units were fielded as often as scheduling would allow,
and the largest volume of traffic was found to be in the mornings from
10 a.m. to 12 noon.
_. As noted on attached study reports, the average speed was 37 mph
in the morning, and 32 mph was the average speed in the
afternoon.
It should be noted that the majority of trucks using this route are
not Tigard based.
Not •only were the monitoring units observing speed violations, but
.: ,were also looking for other types of violations, such as exhaust
brakes and improper equipment. However, none were noted to date.
In regards to the use of DEQ equipment for monitoring noise pollution.
Frank Currie is handling the coordination between the City and DEQ
for that purpose.
Until such time as we can obtain the traffic counters, the police
department will be spot checking during various times on Durham Road.
Respectfully,
L�/
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police
RBA:ac
Attach.
CITY OF TICARD
To: �`� r' rj/�� G.S from. ole t rc. o imp
- -abject: :.r1_r.. �a..�.-�, •�:-�% :�.s-�-� r�'. r:��r-Rate: .� ' � „�
.�t/'�-•� t�•! �� •�r.iS�. ..•moi-'r' � �:.L--..T_ f" � f%., .}'�- �'rte'• �nc'"'�/ �''�''��J
i
SPEED CHECK DURHAM RD..
DATE TIME SPEED VEHICLE TYPE
c4 fff ���°!/w C''�+�/.[' ��f + ire•� '�Yrt-
//';/V•�i-» � �' ��a n-�.,....�,..� f.;•-� S, �? �-�,
- r -
N
b
SPEED CHECK DURHAM RD..
DATE TIME SPEED VEHICLE TYPE
ems- S
37
C
1
g � .
SPEED CHECK DURHAM RD..
DATE // TIME SPEED VEHICLE TYPE /
��"a/�z.- �°;"3� j�t�-t.. 5' £� �� l L�• �i t « Cs�J(.SrE T2�.;UG�a�.:r (G-G� G'!/,� ?—i�'t.tct�
• =�% � —.�i�i�,c� �. CL'f t�.tr9 Ce X�te�!?...�,r. e'�I�LE_TL�2i
3 -� c=Y Cbl X61-t-�i� c• z y� mcctlC S-�o-
f t
SPEED CHECK DURHAM RD..
DATE TIME SPEED VEHICLE TYPE (/
S-1 )-� 3:c.1. 3� -:%�r-I r l'� �.^�--�! F'' `,�6,,o a o �i.e.cc.►ztL.-�Ute_
Y'��G � �-C. �Atcr-r T!S-�_.t i(•��_ T2.xLrGL. - TGit__
q-'C-3 Ao e,,%a o 77LA-C- iL
77ZA e 7-- -Z TTL .
VA-AJ 80 ,
S�: o(e 31 �- -C°. �.��t-r.�`t S ( -T•Z�.-r t�..� 1 7�.�-�r, -1-C.rt
r
Az
1
S
o.� • oC
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: City Recorder 26/60
SUBJECT: Leron Heights Suit Update
DATE: June 17, 1982
Regarding the Leron Heights suit, the judge is taking it into consideration
and will render a decision on the case in two or three weeks.
i
,� t'!:!i�;iri:c:7J"i SLO?v EASf'i•;.. .. ")
KNOW ALI, HEN by THLSE PRESENTS THAT Rav l'nlr and Jo Anne :"1olf,
hushd wife,
hereinafter called the Grantors, in. consideration o'' the sura of no dollars
and other good and valuable consi.derati.on by the City of Tigard,
<\Jhereinafter• called Grantee, have granted and conveyed and by these presents do,
LAm grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual. easement for the con-
struction, maintenance and repair, with necessary access thereto, of a slope,
cut or fill, occasioned by the construction, operation and maintenance of a
L _ public road and appurtenances within the following described parcel of land,
Z5 situated in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon, and being
more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit "A"
IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right,
title or interest to the surface of the soil, nor any other rights except those
expressly stated in this easement, nor prevent Grantors from the full use and
dominion thereover, provided, however, that such use shall not be permitted to
damage or destroy lateral support to the highway, and provided further that
nothing herein contained shall grant to the City of Tigard the right to ex-
cavate beneath existing buildings or deposit fill materials against existing
buildings above the top of the foundations thereof, but it is understood and
agreed the City of Tigard shall never be required to remove the dirt or other
materials placed by it upon said property, nor shall said City be subject to
any damages to the Grantors, their heirs and assigns, by reason thereof, or by
reason of the slopes constructed thereon, or by reason of change of grade at
the street or highway abutting on said property.
IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee,
its successors or assigns should cause said road to be vacated, the rights of
the Grantee in the above described easement will be forfeited and shall im-
mediately revert to the Grantors, their successors and assigns in the case of
any such event.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described and granted premises unto said
Grantee, its successors and assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) has (have) hereunto set his (her) (their)
hand(s) and seal(s) this,:)- day of 47 ajV 19 .
I "
G(/ (SEAL) (SEAL)
.- (SEAL) (SEAL)
(SEAL) (SEAL)
STATE OF OREGON )
ss.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON)
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this day of `/LLtt 19 Sa,
before me the undersigned Notary Public in and for the S ate of Oregon personally
appeared the within-named Ray E. Wolf and Jo Anne Wolf, husband and wife,
who is (are) known to me to be the identical individual(s) described in and who
�. executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that -) (they)
executed the same freely and voluntarily.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this a 7 4�-day
of 19�•
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission expires:
Approved ae,'t•o form this day of 191
City—Atto!ney. ity ligar n
Approved as to legal description this (9 day of 19 G
Approved this -- day of _ --—— 19
CITY COUNCII., CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Ely
a
EXHIBIT "A"
t
A portion of that tract of land under contract between Fred C. Hage and Phyllis
J. Hage, husband and wife, ("Sellers") and Ray E. Wolf and Jo Anne Wolf, husband
and wife ("Buyers") by book 1024 page 879, Washington County deed records,
located in lot 11, Edgewood, a recorded plat in Washington County, in Section 2,
Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington
County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 11 which bears North
01008100" East 30.00 feet from the centerline of County Road No. 430
(SW McDonald Street) ; thence parallel with and 30.00 feet from said
centerline South 89°25'00" East 147.16 feet to the most easterly line
of said Wolf tract; thence on said east line South 01008100" West 10.00
feet; thence parallel with and 20.00 feet from said centerline North
89025100" West 147.16 feet to the west line of said lot 11; thence on
said west line North 01008100" East 10.00 feet to the point of beginning.
REF. NO.
STATE OF OREGON )
COUNTY OF )
On this day of 19 before me appeared
and
both to me personally known who, being duly sworn, did say that he, the said
is the Mayor, and he, the said
is the Recorder of the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal
corporation, and the said and
acknowledged the said instrument to be free
act and deed of said municipal corporation.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,
this the day and year in this my certificate first written.
Notary Public for Oregon
My commission expires:
to
U%
cn o� 1
�• 47
�N 41 V)
f 1
�I
j r7'�• I � f,j 1
oic
I
N u
� a '
O
m U cv i I •
N -z c�
M,ROo16
i
o�i 992 N.•Ril�S ! Ott
-_---- -�•.�Lli 3,IP oON _�`�,'- 96-121 '
1 •
1 1
11
Q
c! CD L _-
o'
lil Vi
oco
�r -
N 1
�s
o �
U n..
-
Pl ^a
.. ...
An
STREET DEDICATION
c �
if
i
a
KNO:•1 ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that MCCALL OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a _
�r Washington Corporation,
hereinafter called grantor(s), for the sum of w 0 dollars grant and dedicate to
the Public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road and utility purposes on, over,
across, under, along and within the following described real property in Washington
County, Oregon:
See Exhibit "A"
To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the Public
for, the uses and purposes hereinabove stated.
The grantor(s) hereby covenants that they are the owner(s) in fee simple and
have good and legal right to grant their rights above-described.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor(s) have hereunto set their hand and seals this
day of ,
(SEAL) (SEAL)
(SEAL) (SEAL)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned corporation has caused this Street Dedication
to be executed by its duly authorized, undersigned officers acting pursuant to
resolution of its Board of Directors.
Name of Co portion
1 .t By: ��11117
Pre'Ldent
"
By:
Secretary
STATE OF OREGON )
COUNTY OFLIU jGA9�asLN .)
On this / day of personally appeared the above named
MCCALL OIL & CHEMICAL COR ObRAT`IONN,, a—Washington Corporation,
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed.
Before Me:
Qr�ir�.�fll•-tU.Grs�.
No$ary Put for &Tregon
My Commission expires:_�iF�. s i91F1
- ACCEPTANCE
Approved as to form this day of
i By-
City or ey - City of Tigard
Approved as to legal. description this �- day of n 1987-
Accepted by the City Council this day of* --, 19
By:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
EXHIBIT "A"
A portion of that tract of land in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West,
of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, described in deed to
McCall Oil & Chemical Corporation, a Washington Corporation, recorded in Book
1021, Page 615, Washington County Book of Records, being more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at an iron pipe in the center of the intersection of
County Roads No. 914 and No. 916, said pipe being also the
beginning point of County Road No. 2439 (SW Tiedeman Avenue) ;
thence on the centerline of County Road No. 2439 North 42027100"
East 71.58 feet; thence South 47033' 25.00 feet to the easterly
right-of-way line of County Road No. 2439; thence on a 25.00 foot
radius curve to the left with a central angle of 106001130" (the
long chord of which bears South 10133145" East 39.94 feet) 46.26
feet to a point perpendicular with and 30.00 feet from the center-
line of County Road No. 914; thence parallel with said centerline
South 63034130" East 285 feet, more or less, to the westerly
right-of-way line of the Oregon Electric Railway Company; thence
southeasterly on said right-of-way line to the intersection with
the centerline of County Road No. 914 (SW Tigard Street) ; thence
on said centerline North 63034130" West 373.25 feet to the point
of beginning.
REF. NO.
STATE OF OREGON )
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 19 , before me appeared
and
both to me personally known who, being duly sworn, did say that he, the said
is the Mayor, and he, the said
is the Recorder of the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal
corporation, and the said and
acknowledged the said instrument to be free
act and deed of said municipal corporation.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal,
this the day and year in this my certificate first written.
Notary Public for Oregon
My commission expires:
t 100+
2-00
I 34DA ! 200-AI
z 1
4
0
J
\� ;C.S. NC 11.1CG) ^l
23 -78 - ,
WEST 43093
100
301 m? 300 9
In 1.B9Ac. e3 .95Ac. mw:
4C0 SEE MAP
\` C.S. 6180 0 0� _14C. IS I 35CA
SEE MAP -
302 s >�� 500 =O f 1 S 13 5CD
i.2 9Ac
.SSAc.
�~ r
^I BEG.R. �•- w p
916 Is
3.86 ERm.Qi .°i I °' Rc2L968.3
C.R.916 C.R.914 22.03
74.9 pI '
' I78CIcATED
A
CS. 4058 c•eo O~ 2 S CA° TAX LOTTED IN
IJ03 :J
c 3 4
'� 6y x4f NAG IS 1 3iGD�z� _
$ SBAc�L 600 '6•'e �� 4n s o m
\ 4Ac. ' o
c.s.9745•0J, .a2 aep
�� •` i� a�m In. �.35Ac.W qO ;I °
o a LGn \ WEST S
_�•g3'4OS4'. 9^S0• _ - Z 99.83 i
46. 194
4
\ y 1_00 , 1300 s.
Spa c. q e t
7 ;
�.. 700 T _
-74
N89 N
7' 800
92Ac. o$ 1202 325 1201 \
_ o .62..4c. 8 .41 Ac. ��,
v- m
ti 5 89^]T•E 337.6 6 .9/
6.75 ln.
��Qfpr
F—' r) 1 1 07 R eS'5i W
a�J E3 J FR r (CS.No.10787) 200
/.2BAc. ++ 1102 O
.00Ac.
5 O 1013 , b12^_K)11 010 1 1 1 O F 1 1 OI
T �m
I r -
I q10 Jr1r
r soar.
I -
r
J � _.° 2
7
7 2 75 75 TS 75 ''•
a
9
73 75
=z I S
111
s I Ino T
to
o ` 1103 1104 1105 1106 110 09 -
T.
1
• w s � — R
r r
Jr
F
R•]�
I I I
o 70 4 I7o 1co Y 6- s .35Ac 05 -35Ac. .35Ac. 35AC 35Ac .35.:c 35-c. T
005 t
t toOB II 1100 \
S.W. 5 KATHE NE STREET
.INT ( ,,TH
SOTH LINE JOHN.\ L. HICKLIN D.L.C. 54
RG NEIGN75 A� -
_ LINE JOHN L. HICKLIN D-LC $7 =x
SEE MAP
fi
2S 1 2BB
`3
ti
� 1{
t
� 1
'S
Avoid Verbal Messages A-1
CITY OF TIGARD
To: Chief of police From: Doris Hartig
Subject:_ SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE APPL. Date: June 11, 1982
Review and recommendation needed for City Council meeting of 6/21/82 for special event
liquor license application approval.
TIGARD AMERICAN LEGION POST #158 - ANNUAL PICNIC - COOK PARK - JULY 17, 1982, 10 am to 7 pm.
We would appreciate having your recommendation by Wednesday, June 16th in order to place
this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting.
Thank you for your assistance.
a . �
June 15, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: City Recorder, Doris Hartig D W
Subject: OLCC Application
The Chief of Police has, after investigation, recommended approval of the
OLCC license application for the American Legion Post Picnic.
lw
Avoid Vernal Messages A-1
CITY OF TIGARD
To: Chief of Police From: Doris HartiQ
Subject: SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE APPL. Date:_ June 11, 1982
Review and recommendation needed for City Council meeting of 6/21/82 for special event
liquor license application approval.
TIGARD AMERICAN LEGION POST #158 - ANNUAL PICNIC - COOK PARK - JULY 17, 1982, 10 am to 7 pm.
We would appreciate having your recommendation by Wednesday, June 16th in order to place
this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting.
Thank you for your assistance.
1 1
• 1 � ��:rr' Z
rw h F
••is M
i c$
Date Issued
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
SPECYAL EVENT LICENSE "PLICATION
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 22297, PORTLAND, OREGON 97222
Application is hereby made for:
Special Retail Beer License @a $10.00 per day per stand No. of Stands No. of days.
Special Retail Wine License @ $10.00 per day per stand No. of Stands No. of days.
Hours of sale are from 7:00 AM to 2:30 AM.Indicate license(s)desired by placing a check mark in the box(es)
above; also indicate the number of stands and number of days you desire to operate. Enclosed is a check or
money order in the amount of$-lC�' —as full payment.Fee will be refunded if license is denied,otherwise
it will not be refunded.
1. Applicant: 0 A fit,/' L:`7 c-A-) �` "n 5
2. Trade Name: yy Telephone No.
3. Mailing Address: /�• /� � ��`/�-2- !�-� ti,L� ah-
(Numb•r)� l (Street) ^ City) (Zip)
4. Event:
Type of Event: Picnic Convention Fair Civic or community enterprise
Other similar special even(t*__ *Specify event
6. Person(s) moi` u� � %� u2�sc - 1'�faiL L✓� az�i'���
(Buai—telephone)
Address: _//t 7� G� rt'� a�t N l�zc` T- to �iy , �G
-Z
(Number)(Number) (street (City) (Zip) (Rome telephone)
7. Address where license will be used:
(Name) (Street) ///City)
/ (Zip) ((CCounty)
8. Exact location of event:
9. Above location is: Within City limits�i Outside City limits (Check one)
10. Date(s)of event:
asv ,o�m
11. Hours of operation: Expected attendance:
12. Who will receive the profits from this license: oF�
13. Uwe understand that a false answer to any of the foregoing questions will subjec this application to denial.Uwe certify
that all information submitted is complete and correct to the best of my/our liowledge.
Signature:
Signature:
`Date 1g2--
COMPLETED AND ENDORSED APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVIeD BY OLCC 10 DAYS
Form 81545-478(Rev.1479) PRIOR TO DATE OF EVENT THAT APPLICATION COVERS.
I
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ENDORSED BY THE APPROPRIATE PERSONS AS INDICATED BELOW, BEFORE
SUBMISSION TO THE OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION.
14. THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE PROPERTY
WHERE THE EVENT IS TO BE HELD OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.
This application has been submitted to
and meets with our approval.
(Authorized sig�tu e) (Date)
15. THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE CHIEF OF POLICE FOR INCORPORATED CITIES OR THE
COUNTY SHERIFF FOR UNINCORPORATED AREAS OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES.
This application has been submitted to
This office recommends —GRANT or REFUSE*
*If recommendation is REFUSE,please indicate grounds for refusal
(Authorized signature) (Date)
OFFICE USE ONLY
SUMMARY OF EVENT: DESCRIBE ACTIVITY,PAST OPERATION,HOW POLICED:
Date received
I certify that the above information has been verified by me. Y
(Name aid title) (Date)
Certificate of Authority to operate issued. (Copy enclosed.)
Forwarded recommending staff action. Supplemental report enclosed.
RES'T'RICTIONS:
Date Issued
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COM[MISSION
SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION
OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 22297, PORTLAND, OREGON 97222
Application is hereby made for:
`Special Retail Beer License $10.00 per day per stand No. of Stands No. of days.
Special Retail Wine License @ $10.00 per day per stand No. of Stands No. of days.
Hours of sale are from 7:00 AM to 2:30 AM.Indicate licenses)desired by placing a check mark in the box(es)
above; also indicate the number of stands and number of days you desire to operate. Enclosed is a check or
money order in the amount of$Zxle�& as full payment.Fee will be refunded if license is denied,otherwise
it will not be refunded.
1. Applicant: / /Gt�� �/►���i C.�ill �� Giy/y �� S /
2. Trade Name: Telephone No. LZ`7 C
3. Mailing Address: /6 dX 3 7
(Number) (sheet) (City) (Zip)
4. Event: /!//!/'Cil /L' h/'
( Type of Event: Picnic_k Convention Fair Civic or community enterprise
Other similar special event* *Specify event
6. Person(s)responsible: 'y-- 7 f l-E/V/u/6 17 U - fi /' M/I /y a c�C [Z
<Name) (Busin telephone)
Address: Z/-L7f SGS P.46P Z3
(Number) t (street) (City) / (Zip) (Houle telephone)
7. Address where(license will be used: .
!- X7/,1/2 P dlf z 3 L{,�t`�S ji l /J�l f6 Aj
(Name) (street) (City) (Zip) (County)
C/
8. Exact location of event: LgC}s;�f /1: -t /(?K
9. Above location is: Within City limits Outside City limits (Check one)
10. Date(s)of event: L L ,,f 1 r] 1599-,
11. Hours of operation: —/� A' ? ! .ZP
Expected attendance:
12. Who will receive the profits from this license: �/D/>/S ��i� % ✓E Z)
13. Uwe understand that a false answer to any of the foregoing questions will subje@t this application to denial.I/w a certify
that all information submitted is complete and correct to the best of my/our rcnowledge U
�� ?,a /
Signature: G�� �=E
';—
Signature: -� A� � v
C f�
Date Y1,1_1 / D 19,92-41,
COMPLETED AND ENDORSED APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY OLCC 10 DAYS
Form 84545478(Rev.10-79) PRIOR TO DATE OF EVENT THAT APPLICATION COVERS.
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ENDORSED BY THE APPROPRIATE PERSONS AS INDICATED BELOW, BEFORE
SUBMISSION TO THE OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION.
14. THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE PROPERTY
WHERE THE EVENT IS TO BE HELD OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.
This application has been submitted to
and meets with our approval.
(Authori d signature)
(Date)
15. THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE CHIEF OF POLICE FOR INCORPORATED CITIES OR THE
COUNTY SHERIFF FOR UNINCORPORATED AREAS OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES.
This application has been submitted to
This office recommends GRANT or REFUSE*
*If recommendation is REFUSE,please indicate grounds for refusal
(Authorized signaturn)
(Date)
OFFICE USE ONLY
SUMMARY OF EVENT: DESCRIBE ACTIVITY,PAST OPERATION,HOW POLICED:
Date received
I certify that the above information has been verified by me.
(Name and title) (Date)
Certificate of Authority to operate issued. (Copy enclosed.
Forwarded recommending staff action. Supplemental report enclosed.
RESTRICTIONS:
June 15, 1982
Schmidt Sanitary Service, Inc.
8325 S.La. Ross Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223
639-5655 639-2378
To the Mayor and City Council Members of Tigard;
At this time our company requests a rate adjustment in
the prices we charge for garbage service in the City of Tigard.
Our last rate adjustment was in October 1980 and went
into effect January .1981 . Since that time our company has ex-
. perienced two postal increases, labor contract increases, and
_two dumping increases. Rossman' s and Newberg landfills are
going to close shortly. The only available alternative for
3
us at this time is to haul to St. John' s landfill in North
Portland adding to our mileage and fuel costs. We are also
expecting an increase in the Metro user fees. Truck costs
and maintenance of trucks has increased steadily in this time.
In order for Schmidt Sanitary Service to continue to
provide clean and efficient service in Tigard, we would like
to schedule a date at a City Council work session to sit and
discuss this rate adjustment request with you. At this session
we can provide our figures for operational costs and answer
any questions you may have.
Tha k you,
Larry Schmidt, Vice-president
Schmidt Sanitary Service, Inc.
LS/ms
C7y
'\
-17 �C3 � ti.,C...,\..4_c!v- � GIIl)�Yl!✓:LC�
"
MEMORANDUM
May 19, 1982
TO: City Administrator / City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Police Department Calls for Service Priority Policy
RE: Mission Statement, Goals and Discretionary Services
Priority Ranking
Sir:
The following suggestions are, in part, a continuation of the growth impact
presentation discussed at the Budget Meeting March 18, 1982, relating to
discretionary service priorities. Also discussed was the police mission
statement, and seven (7) general goal statements, out of which department
objectives can be developed.
It is important for Council to consider adopting a police mission statement
and general goal statemens, as well as prioritizing what discretionary
services will be provided as resources are available. At this point in time
I am not suggesting the termination of any services; however, by establishing
the priorities, the lower priority calls will be delayed until resources are
available. In the future Council will have to make some difficult decisions
-a- on discretionary services that are beyond the scope of available resources,
4_ and by setting the priorities in the near future, it will make the transition
a little less difficult in the future. The citizens of the community may
adjust to the change over a longer period of time rather than an abrupt
termination.
If and when city resources improve, the Community Services Officer concept
may be given consideration, whereby discretionary services may be provided
at a lower cost.
Following are some suggestions relative to a police mission statement, goal
statements, and discretionary service priorities.
First there is a need to establish an acceptable Police Mission Statement,
and agreement of basic police goals. Operational objectives will then fall
out of the goal statements.
Examples:
Police Mission Statement
The Police Department and its resources shall be primarily concerned with the
prevention and suppression of crime, and the protection of life and property.
t
Service Priority Policy
May 19, 1982
Page 2
i
Goal Statements
1. Shall enforce the laws of the United States, the State of Oregon, the
ordinances of the City of Tigard in a fair and impartial manner.
2. Shall provide twenty-four (24) hour police service to the citizens of
the community.
3. Shall respond immediately to all emergency calls for police service.
4. Shall provide for• the safe movement of people and traffic throughout
the city.
5. Shall provide the necessary investigative support to reported crimes by
citizens of the community.
6. Shall conduct special police missions based on crime data analysis.
7. Shall be responsive to all calls for service, consistent -with depart-
ment stated goals and objectives, and within the limited resources
allocated.
Cut Back Management Alternatives
4
The discretionary service calls have been prioritized into three groups:
Required Police Attention; Activities We Should Respond To; and Activities
That Would Be Nice to Provide.
The intent is to establish a rational decision making process to shift
resources to mandatory functions, to trade-off discretionary functions
in order to cope with growth and maintain cost controls.
Non-Criminal Calls for Service
(PRIORITY I)
1. Alarms 9. Warrant, Subpoena, Summons Service
2. Assist Agency (police/fire) 10. Family Fights
3. Check Buildings 11. Lost and Missing Persons
4. Civil Matters 12. Prowlers
5. Dog Bites 13. Suicides and Attempts
6. Disturbance 14. Suspicious Autos
7. F.I.R. 's 15. Hazards
8. Narcotic Information 16. Fires
(PRIORITY II)
1. Ambulance Cover 3. Juvenile Problem
�. 2. Check Occupant 4. Persons (unwanted, sick, confused)
i MISS '111 GABON!
Service Priority Policy
May 19, 1982
Page 3
5. Stand By on Moveout 9. Found Property
6. Suspicious Circumstances 10. Lost Property
7. Traffic Problem 11. Prowl Checks
8. Wire Down 12. Drunk Persons
(PRIORITY III)
1. Animal Problem 5. Towed Auto (Private Request)
2. Assist Citizen 6. Vacation Check
3. Deliver Message 7. Other Situations not Listed
4. Noise Abated
The following are the dispatch and response objective standards which are
established and consistent with the Mission Statement, Goals and Priorities
mentioned above.
Response to Calls for Service: (see Article 405.040 Priorities of Calls,
Police Manual)
A. Priority Code I (Routine)
(a) As resources are available
B. Priority Code II (Prompt) Non-Emergency
(a) Response time 15 minutes, or as soon as resources are available
C. Priority Code III (Immediate) Person may be in danger or crime may be
in progress, and rapid response may result in apprehension
(a) 5 minute repsonse standard
D. Priority Code IV (Emergency) Life is in immediate danger, or in circum-
stance of similar magnitude when time is critical
(a) 3 minute or less repsonse standard
E. Priority Code V (Delayed) Assigned at Citizen Request
(See Article 405.040.30)
(a) Respond when citizen available
Response time is measured from the time call is received at the Dispatch
Center and when the dispatched unit arrives at the designated location.
All calls for service require the initiation of a dispatch card regardless
of the priority, by Services Division personnel.
Service Priority Policy
May 19, 1982
Page 4
The establishment of a Mission Statement, Goals and Priorities will provide
the basic foundation for police objectives in the community; it will provide
general guidance for the police department. These policy decisons require
City Council action, which cannot be properly assumed by the City Administrator
or the Chief of Police. Your help is needed and appreciated.
Respectfully,
R.B. Adams
Chief of Police
RBA:ac
r
t
C E G I E T
� 17035-1368
HOURLY COST $19.68
HOURS WORKED 52,615
PATROL DIVISION 58 %
BUDGE-1 $605,460
HOURLY COST $21.22
HOURS WORKED 28,535
SERVICE DIV. 16.16%
BUDGET$167,326
HOURLY COST ADMIN_
13.12 INVES . DIV. 13.52
HRS.WORKED DIV. 11.84 BUDGET .
12,750.5 BUDGET $140,034
122,548 HOURLY COST
HOURLY COST #24.60
OUR21.73
S WORKED 56591E
5638.5
• t
. 13A qu T 12 . 1 13 1 J T . 1 11
11 F
- v ...
12 . -E . lqu 11 U P C - E So
CRIMINAL MATTERS
32;752.9 HRS.419.68=
$6X1.4,57.7.07
62.25 cX c
> n
�.�,►. cn
TRAFFIC MATTERS
8961 HRS. X$19.68=
�-- 4176,354.45 NOW
0 17.03X CRIMINAL-
�� - CALLS
.FOR SERVICE
10,896HRS.X$19.68=
$214,43 3.28
20.71 `7
4SCRE TI Ohl ARY
v
9 '
)
•
c
•`p
®L^! to
LLI
0
co
o
Lo
J
7 �
i ® �
tx
'• o 'I V
Z Q W E�
En
_ � Q
1
C> Chi
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION No. 82—
A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A POLICE MISSION STATEMENT AND
GENERAL GOAL STATEMENTS AS WELL AS ADDRESSING PRIORITIES FOR DISCRETIONARY SERVICES.
WHEREAS , the Tigard City Council has determined that it is necessary to
adopt a police mission statement , general goal statements , and a prioritization of
what discretionary services will be provided as resources are available; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council hereby determines that the establishment
of a Mission Statement , Goals and Priorities will provide the basic foundation
for police objectives in the community and it will further provide general
guidance for the Police Department.
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT:
Section 1: The following Police Mission Statement is hereby adopted:
The Police Department and its resources shall be primarily
concerned with the prevention and suppression of crime , and
the protection of life and property.
Section 2: The following Goal Statements are hereby adopted:
1. The Tigard Police Department shall enforce the laws of
the United States, the State of Oregon , and the ordinances
of the City of Tigard in a fair and impartial manner.
2. The Tigard Police Department shall provide twenty—four
(24) hour police service to the citizens of the community.
3. The Tigard Police Department shall respond immediately to
all emergency calls for police service.
4. The Tigard Police Department shall provide for the safe
movement of pe op le and traffic throughout the city.
5. The Tigard Police Department shall provide the necessary
investigative support to reported crimes by citizens of
the community.
6. The Tigard Police Department shall conduct special police
missions based on crime data analysis.
7. The Tigard Police Department shall be responsive to all calls
for service , consistent with department stated goals and
objectives, and within the limited resources allocated.
RESOLUTION No. 82—
Section 3: The following priorities are hereby adopted for discretionary
service calls. The intent is to establish a rational decision making
process to shift resources to mandatory functions , to trade-off
discretionary functions in order to cope with growth and maintain
cost controls. Discretionary service call responses will be prioritized
with the lower priority calls being delayed until resources are available.
The discretionary service calls have been prioritized into three
groups with Priority I calls being the highest priority and Priority
III calls being the lowest.
PRIORITY I SERVICE CALLS
1. Alarms 9. Warrant , Subpoena, Summons Service
2. Assist Agency (police/fire)10. Family Fights
3. Check Buildings 11. Lost and Missing Persons
4. Civil Matters 12. Prowlers
5. Dog Bites 13. Suicides and Attempts
6. Disturbance 14. Suspicious Autos
7. F.I.R. 's 15. Hazards
8. Narcotic Information 16. Fires
PRIORITY II SERVICE CALLS
T. Ambulance Cover 7. Traffic Pr ob lem
2. Check Occupant 8. Wire Down
3. Juvenile Problem 9. Found Property
4 . Persons (unwanted , sick, 10. Lost Property
confused) 11. Prowl Checks
5. Stand By on Move out 12. Drunk Persons
6. Suspicious Circumstances
PRIORITY III SERVICE CALLS
1, Animal Problem 5. Towed Auto (Private Request)
2. Assist Citizen 6. Vacation Check
3. Deliver Message 7. Other Situations Not Listed
4. Noise Abated
PASSED: This day of , 1982 by the Tigard City Council.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
Recorder - City of Tigard
PAGE 2
RESOLUTION No. 82-
June 15, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Rationale for the Proposed Tigard Land Development Code
(Zoning Ordinance Revision)
The City of Tigard presently regulates land development or the use of land by
a number of methods including the zoning, subdivision and sign ordinances, the
building code, City Council policies, and the Comprehensive Plan. These various
regulating devices are based on the City's "police power" to provide for the
general welfare of its residents as well as on specific state legislation which
enables development regulations and mandates comprehensive planning. Zoning
ordinances, the principal means of regulating land use, have been used by local
governments for over 60 years in this country and since 1962 in Tigard. Al-
though zoning "enjoys' wide acceptance, it has been severely criticized in
recent years as being inflexible, and in many cases, counter-productive to the
achievement of a community's land use goals. These criticisms of zoning stem
primarily from the fact that the form and content of today's zoning ordinances
have changed little from those of the 1920's.
As part of its planning program for compliance with state planning goals and
legislation, the City of Tigard has indicated its intention to revise its present
land use regulations. To date, work on the Ordinance Revision project has in-
volved preliminary staff analysis and research, some initial ordinance drafting,
and preliminary policy direction from the City Council and Planning Commission.
Some of the problems identified with the present Zoning Ordinance include:
1. The present Zoning Ordinance relies on self-executing, generally
negative provisions which are intended to prohibit inappropriate
development rather than achieve desired development.
2. Specific development standards and per-itted uses are prestated
and applied to the community's land area without regard for unique
site characteristics and surrounding land uses.
3. The Zoning Ordinance is well suited for protecting existing
development but it is limited in its ability to respond to the
dynamics of land development and redevelopment.
4. Existing development standards based on minimum requirements
encourage monotony and uniformity in new development.
5. The present Zoning Ordinance does not provide incentives for
quality design and the provision of amenities.
6. The existence of separate zoning, subdivision and sign ordinances
is unnecessary and can restrict the City's ability to direct its
physical growth and development in a manner consistent with its planning
goals.
Proposed Tigard Land Development Code
- The Tigard Land Development Code proposed is based on the concept of a
unified land use regulatory system. Such a system has been proposed by
a number of authorities in the field of land use regulation. Most notable
is the American Law Institute which, after some 15 years of research, study,
and deliberation, has published a model Land Development Code. The Code
is written in the form of state enabling legislation from which local
governments would derive authority to regulate land development.
It is interesting to note that in 1975, the State of Oregon amended its
laws relating to city planning and zoning to specifically permit the use
of development ordinances. The amending legislation also repealed those
sections of the state statutes related to "zoning and building setback
ordinances," thereby deleting language taken from the original Zoning
Enabling Act of the 1920's.
The Bureau of Governmental Research and Service at the University of
Oregon has prepared a model land development code to assist local govern-
ments in the formulation of land development ordinances.
- The Land Development Code, as proposed by staff, is intended to accomplish
two basic objectives. First, to improve the administration of land use
regulation through a unified land development code which coordinates all
forms of development authorization prior to the issuance of a building
permit. Second, to implement the Comprehensive Plan through development
regulations which recognize the various stages of land development and
apply appropriate development standards.
The major features of the proposed Code which relate specifically to the
attainment of these objectives are:
1. A review system which would consolidate and coordinate the review
of land development for compliance with applicable regulations prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
2. The format which organizes the major components of the Code into
three articles (administration, development zoning districts, and develop-
ment standards) each of which would contain all of the applicable land use
regulations.
3. Development standards which articulate development objectives that are
consistent with adopted planning policies and which de-emphasize prestated
minimum requirements.
4. A format which will allow the incremental enactment of land development
regulations in a coordinated manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
policies as they may be adopted.
The Need for a Land Development Code
It can be argued that many of the above cited deficiencies can be corrected
without converting from one land use regulatory system to another. Cer-
tainly all of the present administrative procedures for variances, planned
developments, rezonings, and all the other procedures related to "zoning"
could be located in one section of a revised zoning ordinance. But where,
for example, should procedures which relate to the subdivision process,
-2-
street vacations, appeals from the sign ordinance, and annexation pro-
cedures be located?
Under the proposed Land Development Code, all administrative procedures
which relate to the development of a parcel of land could be located in
one article of a unified code. From such a code the obvious benefits of
improved administration and coordination as well as citizen and developer
understanding and awareness of the land use regulatory system would be de-
rived. Even more importantly, the consolidation of all regulatory pro-
cedures related to land development would facilitate implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan.
The various stages of land development must be reviewed and regulated as
a unified process rather than a series of disjointed decision points if
the land use policies of the proposed Comprehensive Plan are to be im-
plemented. The structure and format of the proposed Land Development Code
would facilitate the implementation of more sophisticated and complex
development standards envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. Although the
development standards as presently contained in the City's various land use
regulations could be revised in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the
success of their ultimate application and implementation would seem to rely
heavily on the level of coordination that is possible under the regulatory
system that is in existence. Unless the regulatory system induces a greater
degree of continuity in the land use decision making process and coordination
in the development review process, implementation of the Comprehensive Plan
will be an uncertain process.
The other deficiencies noted above which relate to the traditional approach
to land use regulation: predesignation of specific properties for specific
classes of uses, predetermination of development specifications, and the
failure to recognize the various stages of urban development could also
be "corrected" by revising the Zoning Ordinance. Such a revision, however,
would only perpetuate a land use regulatory system with a basic deficiency
that it fails to address the development of land as a dynamic process.
The effect of adopting the proposed Land Development Code would be more
procedural than substantive. The provisions of the Code, related to per-
mitted uses, intensities of development, and standards for development could
be revised whether the concept of a land development code is accepted or
not. But unless the procedural changes outlined in the proposed Development
Code are adopted, the implementation of new development criteria and standards
will be jeopardized by an antiquated regulatory process.
Development Criteria and Standards
- The procedural aspects of the proposed Land Development Code have been dis-
cussed in some detail above. The benefits of a more efficient land use
regulatory system should be apparent. But the more beneficial and lasting
effects of the new regulations will depend on their ability to achieve the
land development objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The
substantive provisions of the Land Development Code will be directed to
these objectives and policies.
- Development criteria and standards would be devised for each district to
address its development concerns such as lot coverage, building relation-
ships, open space, parking areas, and landscaping. Such criteria and
standards would be based on identified public concerns with the land develop-
ment process. These concerns would be articulated and appropriate performance
-3-
criteria would be formulated to mitigate the adverse effects of development.
Desirable development would be encouraged through flexibility and incentives.
Devising such development standards will not be an easy task simply because
it will require a reevaluation of present land use regulations and the role
of the community in the land development process. Such a review, however,
is a necessary prerequisite to the formulation and adoption of an alter-
native regulatory system to the antiquated and universally criticized system
now in use.
Requested Action
Staff is requesting that the City Council review this memorandum and recommend
that staff proceed in the drafting of a Land Development Code for Community
of Tigard.
-4-
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Annexation Update
DATE: June 17, 1982
With the adoption of Ordinance 79-26, the City Council specifically addressed
which areas should be annexed into the City and which areas should be left
under Washington County's jurisdiction. The areas defined by the City Council
are shown on the map attached to Ordinance 79-26.
The following is a brief description of the City's action in relation to each
of the thirteen areas.
Subarea #1: Since the adoption of Ordinance 79-26 no annexations to the City
of Tigard have occurred in this area.
Subarea #2: This area in its entirety was annexed to the City of Tigard in
April of 1982. It was referred to as the North Dakota Island
Subarea #3: Since 1979 there have been two (2) annexations in the triangle
area. The Larson Annexation was approved in the spring of 1981
and the Tozer-Simms Annexation was approved in March of 1982.
Subarea #4: No annexations to the City of Tigard have occurred in this area.
Subarea #5: This area was split into two islands. The northern half, referred
to as the McDonald Island was annexed to the City of Tigard in
August of 1981, while the southern, referred to as the Alderbrook
Island was recently annexed to the City in March of 1982.
Subarea #6: This area, minus the Durham School site, was annexed to the City
of Tigard in March of 1982.
Subarea #7: To date this area is still outside of the City of Tigard's in-
corporated limits.
Subarea #8: A portion of this area, the Bechtold Annexation, was annexed to
the City in April of 1982.
Subarea #9: No annexations have occurred in this area since the adoption of
Ordinance 79-26.
Subarea #10: No extreme northwest corner of this area remains outside the
Tigard City limits. The remaining portions of this area were
annexed in April 1979 and February 1980.
Page 2
Subarea #11: This area was annexed to the City of Tigard in the fall of 1979.
Subarea #12: No annexations have occurred in this area.
Subarea #13: This area was annexed to the City of Tigard in the fall of 1981.
Ordinance 79-26 also stated that the City should not encourage piecemeal
annexations in an attempt to create a compact city limit area.
Since the adoption of the Ordinance 79-26 the City has been reasonably successful
in annexing those areas specified in the ordinance. However, the City Council
and City Staff has stated that the City can also achieve its annexation goals
by incorporating those remaining island areas, and responding to piecemeal
annexations in those remaining areas inside the Urban Planning Area.
Therefore, staff has redrafted the annexation policy to reflect those
annexations attitudes of the City Council.
t
.-. - � -• � � '� sem°`•
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE No. 79-.Z(-
AN
9-.Z(-AN OR)IN.;%NCE SPECIFYING TELE ANNEXATION PLAN FOR VARIOUS UNINCORPOPtATEM LANDS WHICH ARE
WITHIN TIGARD'S URBAN PLANNING AREA AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS SEVEN DISTRICT _
AREAS SEFERENCED BY ADOPTED NEIGIIBORIIOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION PL ANS; PRESCRIBING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS: The City Council finds that the Tigard Planning Commission, with the
assistance of the Planning Department, and the response of interested
citizens given a public hearing, has submitted a Draft Annexation Plan dated
August 18, 1978, with recommended changes dated November 2, 1978, AND;
WHEREAS: That the City Council further finds that said documentary presentation has
as its base an evaluation of the public facilities and services, iiec_d
for a compact city boundary, community and neighborhood identity within the exist:^
in, Urban Planning Area, and seven adopted NPO areas; and includes policies that
promote h public interest, health, safety, comfort, convenience, and welfare
o€ the c mmunity; and complies with the requirements of a comprehensive plan as _
contemplzLM by Chapters 197 and 227, O.R.S. concerning annexation, AND;
"iEREAS: The Council further finds that after due and legal notice, a public
. hearing was held in the Lecture Room at Fowler Junior High School,
on November 13, 1978, by the City Council, at which time all interested persons
were afforded an opportunity to be heard with respect thereto and to comment
thereon, AND;
WHEREAS: In furtherance of the above findings, the City Council. hereby d��=mines
that this document denoted 'Annexation Plan' for the City of: Ti g,31-d c•7i-t:I1
'Annexation sub-area map' is a desirable and necessary guide to decision on the'
future boundary of -the City and is hereby adontPci and promulgated as an element of
the comprehensive plan for the_area involvea, AND;
WH'REAS: To ensure that the provisions of this Annexation Plan become immediately
effective in guiding annexation decisions of property owner:,, the City
Council, and the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary. Commission, and
thereby preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the residents thereof, an
emergency is declared to exist and the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall
become effective immediately upon passage and approval by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, The Annexation Policies of the City of Tigard are as follows:
C.
Subarea #1 - South Metzger (NPO #4 and small portion of NPO #2)
Polic�r: The City should not annex into the area north of Spruce Street_
at this time.
{ Subarea #2 - (North portion of NPO #2 and- East central part of NPO #7)
Policy: The City should pursue annexation of this entire subarea.
E
ORD �'t�:CNo- 79-
ZN ,��
Subarea #3 - TiPard Triangle (NPO #4) ��C
Policy: The City should pursue annexation of this entire subarea_
C
Subarea #4 - 2-fetzgzer (Oak Street to Taylors Ferry Road)
Policy: The City of Tigard should not annex into this subarea.
Subarea #5 - McDonald Street - Little Bull Mountain (NPO's #1 and #6)
Policy: The City should immediately consider annexation of this entire subarea.
Subarea #6 - (Southwest NPO #5 azid Southeast NPO #6) C. .
Policy: The City should pursue annexation of this entire subarea,
Subarea *#7 '- (Southwestern portion of NPO #6)
Poli_c : The City should encourage annexation of this subarea.
Subarea #8 - Northeast slo a of Bull Mountain (NPO #3 and small arts of NPO V7)
Policy: The City should pursue annexation in this entire ubarea,
Subarea #9 - Southeast shoulder of Bull lit_ (NPO 03)
Policy: The City should not pursue annexation of this area_ .
Subarea•0r10 - (Northwest corner of NPO #7
Policy: The City should eventually encourage annexation of this area.
Subarea 011 - Summercrest Subdivision (NPO #7 island) .
Policy: This "island" subarea should immediately be considered fa;: annexation
by the City.
Subarea #12 - Bull Mountain (West of the Tigard Detailed Plan Area)
Policy: The City should not annex into this area at this time. A detailed
examination of desirable 'ultimate' boundaries for the City should he con-
ducted prior to consideration of annexation of this area.
Subarea #13 - Parcel on Scholls Ferry Road (NPO #7)
Policy: This "island" subarea•should be immediately considered for
annexation by the City,
IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES
1. All City Council decisions on specific annexation proposals will. be based
r on this Annexation Plan.
2. All Tigard-area annexation decisions by the Portland Metropolitan Area
Local Government Boundary Commission should be in conformance with this
Annexation Plan.
ORDINANCE No_ 79-26
3. The annexation priorities identified in this Annexation Plan will guide
City Staff and the City Council in the processing of annexation proposals_
In particular, primary attention will be given to annexing: (1)
"islands" and (2) wedges of unincorporated territory surrounded on three
sides by the City.
k. The City will not approve the extension of city sewer lines beyond its`
municipal borders except where there is a potential or imminent health
hazard.
5. Piecemeal annexations that involve a small number of parcels r7i17_ be
�disc -. exce t insofar as they are part of a definite program.
for expediting incorporation of a larger, more compact block of
territory in the near future.
MAP-
References to subareas made in this document are to be found on the `Annexation
Subarea Map` included as Exhihit "A".
WHEREAS: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health and safety of the people
of the City of Tigard that the foregoing change in the boundaries of the '
City become a permanent part of the City's records, an emergency is hereby declared
to exist, and this ordinance shall be effective upon its passage by the Council; and
approval by the Mayor.
lk.`PASSED: By the City Council by s a vote of all Council members present,
after.being read two times by number and title only, this ��day of
i7r_u-. ( 1979.
Recorder - City of Ti rd
ATTEST:
i ayor -- City of Tzgard
ORDINANCE No. 79--C,
Page 3
r
�•._� r ,�� ' ,�> '• . � .. __ ,� w, 11._x,
J r
�`•.'y i �/j" \ ••—,i...� (IIT .._ - I` . `lr
._.... - ® , i -fir � '•,.
/YOV,ExA
TION
6,17Y 6F T160D
r
/-/3 S OBARIW6 L
li �t� :>
! ( _ I—LJ
WZIT
LT 1.J�.._ f�� :... 6. .
/clrr of nu.cn�o _ n vlcl , i
I{ SCAR I":.>pp' _ i I I II �� i• i .lr' Lr s
.JL1[6146SZ`•
Jim DUN
else.
v
HOW
MEN
onus
Ulls
sell I
all NO
SEB Err.L
IWO N I Ole
aim...cesseS.
MIS Mag
WASSW
H
call.,
GO
]PJ'
I NO
9 li. 41.111.1,4t,
40-
'
f—j I
61'
it
F
F O
1
C O m O bll
F O N O e^1
O N O
U i v
U
_O Or 1 0ll
O� 1
O O
V
Y O O O O
O NII
•U
F N O O O O �II
n 0 O O O
� � h
U r
� — 1
O y •+ d N N
X
1
y= O O O O O O
3 Z N N N r
02
F c0 NOVNb �01111�r� Orb
O IOIOO
g cF nIOI
,]H I N?IT p N iO
< ,O
t
N •> S h
\ H C V u .1
sC O
u Y d O Q V w U N 1 W 4 I�al CO roil H w 6 >
U -. � O .4 h=.7 •4•>w rtn aCi N n 7 U O N.>.� ..1 CI u �N F V 4
x = OXY r •-r 4 t>` C o 0 a� b < O C O O rUi a u
O 9 u C M 8 C c M:2 2 0 0 VUO a 6 ^ of rCJ ~ J 'u y p �JJ 1
O
.-r--.-r-------- N NN N N N N NN N N OO n V�T ✓�vl J� �p u' V
N N
i
June 17, 1982
MI MORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Floyd's Restaurant
In the past week, there has been discussion regarding the "expansion" of
Floyd's Restaurant. The Planning Department has reviewed this matter in detail
and finds the following:
1. The work done has a basic remodeling of the interior space. No
structural or exterior changes were made.
2. Only major alterations including structural changes and square footage
expansions require building permits. No building permit was required for
this project.
3. Electrical, mechanical and plumbing permits were issued for the remodel.
4. A building permit for the roof was issued in 1969.
5. A Conditional Use permit was not required when the deli was opened
in 1980. The Planning Director allowed the expansion with no permit because
there was no building expansion. Total floor area remained the same.
6. Prior to 1980, the area used as the deli until June 1982 was used as
storage.
7. No additional restaurant license was required for the deli in 1980.
8. ' When the deli was approved in 1980, the parking requirements were grand-
fathered. Since the recent "alterations" did not involve additional building
area, no more parking spaces were required.
- Corrected 6/21/82
1982-83 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS/WITH PROPOSED TMEA/OPEU CONTRACT AIIEND14ENTS
SUMMARY
Expenditures By Program
PERSONAL SERVICES Budget Add
Committee Budgeted
Program Recommended with TMEA (Cut)
Finance & Records* $224,808 $250,571 $ 25,763
Municipal Court 20,602 20,879 277
Library 118,427 114,346 ( 4,081)
Public Works 526,269 537,144 10,875
Planning & Development* 194,972 208,349 13,377
Policy & Administration 121,348 121,874 526
TOTAL $1,206,426 $1,253,163 $ 46,737
*Includes one additional employee
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Public Works Streets $1,158,105 $1,155,857 ($ 2,248)
General Government
Legal Fees 320,102 310,102 ( 10, 000)
CONTINGENCY
Parks #1 $ 10,000 $ 7,500 ($ 2,500)
Parks #2 10,000 7,500 ( 2,500)
General Fund 33,618 43,618
( 10,000)
REVENUE
Sewer Fund Balance $ 102,532 $ 134,266 $ 37,234
State Tax Street Fund
(Gas Tax) 296,450 249,950 ( 46,500)
REVENUE SUMMARY SHEET
Proposed Adjusted
Sewer Fund $ 562,782 $ 599,016
State Tax Street Fund 301,450 254,950
Sub-Total $4,466,159 $4,455,893
TOTAL REVENUES $9,595,412 $9,585,146
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Net Outlay $4,617,575 $4,602,809
Contingency 77,837 82,337
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $9,595,412 $9,585,146
O�fi�• CITY OF
on fh;a TIGARD .�. o
aheef fl
n' N r
Y U Q w o N 3
Counf WASHINGTON '
N 1—
Ce w W
ei.�+io RECOUNT Ln
> s
JUNE 16, 1982 — w C
LU �� a,
Page of Page,
YES NO
N•m•or B•ilof Number > rn
No.of P,..;.& 226 227 O
30 / p O
31 / O z
32 7 2 4�
33 1546 /Af H
34 2,67 Z03
35
40 S I 77 _
41 Z$ Z4/ <
46
ABSENTEES
ooz
n
��3
w 3
—O
O�
3
1 0
v O H
• !�'.r ti � I w �•i
TOTAL
I certify that the votes recordeg on this abstract cor- Sign re of County erk: Date of Abstract
redly summarize the tally of votes cast at the election
indicated
ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT GENERAL AND ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT PRIMARY ELECTIONS:
SPECIAL ELECTIONS: Separate sheets for Democratic, Republican, Nrnparfisan, and other
candidates.
Votes cast for Governor must be on separate
page or pages. Seperate sheets for candidates for City, Coun-+' (including precinct)
and State office.
For additional instructions see ORS 250.810. For additional instructions, see ORS 249.410.
f
O'DONNELL. DATE: 6/17/82 �� ' �•
•SULL:-VAN & RAMIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW TO: Tigard City Council
1727 N.W. HOYT STREET
PORTLAND. OREGON 97209
(503) 222-4402 FROM: Ed Sullivan
RE: Tigard Charter Amendments: Issues
Doris Hartig raised the following charter concerns with the
council on June 14, 1982:
1 . Current Language:
Chapter 3, S 10, Other Officers.
"Additional officers of the city shall be a municipal judge,
recorder, and such other officers as the council deems
necessary. Each of these officers shall be appointed and
may be removed by the mayor with the consent of the council.
The council may designate any appointive officers to
supervise any other appointive officer except a municipal
judge in the exercise of his judicial function. "
Issue
Should the City Attorney and the City Administrator be
mentioned here?
Recommendation.
None. This is a policy matter for council .
2. Current Language:
Chapter 4, S 20, Mayor.
"The mayor shall appoint the committees provided by the rules
of the council. He shall sign all approved records of
proceedings of the council and countersign all orders on the
treasury. He shall have no veto power and shall authenticate
by his signature all ordinances passed by the council within
three days after being enacted. After the council approves
a bond of a city officer or a bond for a license, contract,
or proposal, the mayor shall authenticate the bond by his
endorsement thereon. "
Issues.
a. Should there be criteria or rules for the mayor' s
committee appointments?
b. Is the last sentence of this section necessary?
Recommendation.
The above should first be addressed by the City Council as
policy issues.
EJS:mch
6/17/82 - Page 1
O'--,DONNELL. DATE 6/17/82
SULLIVAN & RAMIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1727 N.W. HOYT STREET TO: Tigard City Council
PORTLAND. OREGON 97209
15031 222-4402 FROM: Ed Sullivan
RE: Tigard Charter Amendments: Issues
3 . Proposed Amendment to Tigard City Charter, Chapter 9, § 40 .
Recommendations.
a. Delete entire section.
b. Replace with:
"Except as provided or allowed by state law, all contracts
for public improvements to be made by a private contractor
shall be let to the lowest responsible bidder. All public
contracts shall be performed in accordance with plans and
specifications approved by the council. The council shall
have the right to reject any or all bids for public
contract. "
Comment.
The proposed amendments to Tigard City Charter § 40 removes
the $2,500 limit as requested by the City Administrator.
Rather than making the charter provision amount specific, the
amendment is drawn with the intent of allowing flexibility in
the actual ceiling amount.
This amendment can easily be implemented by resolution amending
the Tigard Contract Review Board Rules. The TCRBR can be
amended to allow maximum ceiling amounts by adoption of the
provisions of OAR 127-10-020 (the Public Contract Review Board
Rule regulating ceiling amounts) . Further, the language of
the proposed amendment allows council to make changes in the
ceiling amount by resolution, rather than charter amendment,
should the state law change in the future.
4. Debt Limit:
Issue.
Should the city' s debt limit be changed?
Current Charter Language:
"Section 41. Except by consent of the voters, the city' s
voluntary floating indebtedness for general
city purposes shall not exceed $5,000. For purposes of
calculating limitation, however, the legally authorized debt
of the city in existence at the time this charter takes effect
shall not be considered. All city officials and employees
who create or officially approve any indebtedness in excess
of this limitation shall be jointly and severally liable for
the excess. "
EJS:mch
6/17/82 - Page 2
O'QONNELL. DATE: 6/17/82
SULLIVAN & RAMIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1727 N.W. HOYT STREET TO: Tigard City Council
PORTLAND. OREGON 97209
15031 222-4402 FROM: Ed Sullivan
RE: TZgard Charter Amendments: Issues
Recommendation.
The debt limitation should either be raised to an amount to
be specified by the council, or should be abolished.
Comments.
Amounts of debts incurred by the city are purely a matter
of council policy, with some limitations set by Article XI,
S 11 of the Oregon Constitution. It has become evident that
the current $5,000 limit is too small and needs adjustment.
i
EJS:mch
6/17/82 - Page 3
Chapter III/Section7/3rd paragraph:0. pY°�i ►opM,�equQesTed 7 member oCo�nVil�
issue be laced on 24a ballotxta recom.. nde cViange yin the wordage to
bring section into compliancwith
state election laws_
e Cor"`�`d
�. ::x-
Chapter
Chapter III/Section 10/1st paragraph: Staff suggested that the addition of
City Administrator and Legal Counsel to the appointive staff would make
the charter link stronger especially between the City Administrator and
City Recorder. Council requested this item be considered at the November
election or later.
Chapter III/Section 12/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel stated that staff's
questions could be handled in-house and would not require a charter.
revision.
Chapter_ IV/Section 13/lst paragraph: Legal Counsel advised Council that the
question of who could call the special meetings when the Mayor was absent
was purely a policy matter and would be best discussed by Council. City
Administrator noted that Councilor Stimler had expressed concern regarding
this issue and stated that staff has no recommendation in the matter. He
cautioned Council to have Attorney check any language changes proposed to
guard against abuse. Mayor Bishop stated he had never seen any problems
with this section in the past. Legal Counsel also advised Council. that this
section does have some language that is confusing with the open meeting law
however there is no legal conflict. City Administrator suggested deferring
considerat-ion of these issues until all five members of Council are present
and can discuss ramifications.
Chapter IV/Section 14/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel-noted that he could draft
an ordinance at a later date to bring the City into compliance with this
section of the charter.
Chapter IV/Section 16/1st paragraph: Mayor Bishop requested discussion
regarding the Study Session vs Regular Meeting issues. Legal Counsel stated
that under the rules of charter Council could not take final action at-a
Study Session unless it was reaffirmed at the next Regular Meeting, Mayor
Bishop requested Study Sessions be limited and hold more Regular Meetings
so that final action may be taken when Council meets.
Chapter IV/Section 18/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel noted that this was
a policy matter. Mayor Bishop suggested language be added to define how the
Mayor is "unable to perform the functions of his office" by adding the
words 'physically or mentally' .
Chapter V/Section 20/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel noted this is purely a
policy matter and set forth some suggestions by staff. Council requested
this item be considered in November election.
Chapter V/Section 21/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel advised Council of problem
and consensus of Council was to consider issue at the May election per staff's
language proposal.
Chapter VI/Section 30/lst paragraph: Legal Counsel noted that this issue
could be dealt-with in-house.
Chapter VI/Section 31/all: Legal Counsel stated there is a problem with
conformance with state law with time line for filing. Legal Counsel_ will
diaft language for May election.
PAGE 4 - COUNCII. MINUTES - FEBRUARY 15. 1982
Chapter VII/Section 32/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel said there was no problems
and stated this would be handled in-house.
Chapter VII/Section 33/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel noted this conflicts with
Chapter III, Section 7 of the Charter and recommended deletion may be best.
Council requested this item be considered in the May election.
Chapter VIII/Section 35/all: Legal Counsel noted that this section needs some
cleaning up. Council recommended Legal Counsel research issue and
prepare for November election.
Chapter IX/Section 39/1st paragraph: Legal Counsei stated there would be no
changes needed in the Charter, that this issue could be settled by adoption of
an ordinance at a later date.
Chapter IX/Section 40/1st paragraph: City Administrator stated that state law
limit is $10,000 compared to Charter's $2,500. He felt this would best meet:
the needs of the City if the price was no more restrictive than the state.
Council requested this be handled at the November election.
ChapterIX/Section 4 1/1st paragraph: Legal Counsel stated that Oregon
Constitution does not deal with debt limits for cities, however, the
limit for counties is $10,000. City Administrator recommended more
consideration of this issue before the November election.
Chapter IX/Section 42/lst paragraph: Legal Counsel noted that this section
is completely outdated with state law (ORS 30.300) . He recommended this
entire section be repealed in the May election. Consensus of Council was
to have prepared for May election.
NOTES: Legal Counsel stated Council may want to set policy regarding Recall
Elections. Finance Director drew Council attention to Section 25 of the Charter
and suggested there may need to be some changes to bring it into compliance
with state election laws. Council requested this be handled at the
November.e le c ti on.
(c) Legal Counsel requested Council approve the following list of changes for the
May election if that was their pleasure. Section 7, 18, 21, 31, 33, & 42—
(d) Mayor Bishop discussed the need also for a resolution calling for an
election in November for the Urban Renewal Agency as required by an ordinance
adopted by Council late last year.
(e) Consensus of Council was to direct Legal Counsel to prepare language for
Sections 7, 18, 21, 31, 33 & 42 of the Charter for a May election and
present to Council on 3-8-82.
RECESS: 9:38 P..M.
RECONVENE: 9:45 P.M.
12. FINANCE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT
(a) Finance Director/City Recorder introduced the Council to the various members
of the department and gave an overview of the department's functions. She
explained in greater detail the cash investment history of the City and the
process for applying for a Certificate of Conformance from the Municipal
Finance Officer's Association.
Or
ay, Jure,
CHARTER REVIEW ISSUES - DRAFT - _,, vembeV
FEBRUARY. 15,.1,,,2 COUNCIL MEETING - PROPOSALS PREPARED BY CITY i,-.;ORDER'S OFFICE
ELECTION
PAGE 0 CHAPTER & SECTION A PARAGRAPH ISSUE PROPOSED LANGUAGE CHANGES PRIORITY _
C5 Chapter III/Sec-7 3rd Contradicts Ch. VI, Sec. 31 Recommend Legal Counsel address issues
��NKX���•�X�I�NfIAdAlfi��ll,�A/1�,4�lhri�l
Cnty. handles elections-may not meet require.-See_.attached proposal for language change in Sec. 31
of charter - outdated. Mayor & Council/ paragraph 3.
Form of Government question..7 Council Members
C3-1 Chapter III Sec.10 1st 4th & 5th lines 'mayor with common consent' Legal Counsel address 'common consent'
-what is common consent. questions.
City Admin. position added? See attached Section 10 rewordage to
City Attorney osition added... addpositions.
C5-1 Chapter III/Sec.12 1st Compare to State laws current? Legal Counsel research and propose
language changes.
C6 Chapter IV/Sec. 13 1st Rewrite! Legal Counsel propose language
Timing for calling special meeting-hours changeF
What kind of notice-post/ads/emergency/
Who call call special meeting-Mayor/common
consent of Council/President of Council in
Mayor's absence/
Wheie'are adopted rules for governing
members and proceedings?
Regular vs Study Session Meetings?
C6 Chapter IV/Sec. 14 1st No ordinance adopted. Charter language does not n ed to be
changed, however, an ordinance should
be adopted which addresses issue in
this section.
C6 Chapter IV/Sec. 16 1s /&j This question should be addressed
under Section 13 of the Charter.
C6 Chapter IV/Sec. 18 1st Clarify Chairman's functions & authority(ie Legal Counsel should review
calling special meetings in absence of Mayor) language proposal by staff
(see attached Section 18.)
C6-1 Chapter V/Sec. 20 1st Contradicts Ch.1II,Sec.7 (Mayor with common Legal Counsel should address
C7 consent) these issues.
"Mayor appoints committees provided by rules
of Council1'-?-??
Bonds:.. Mor or desi neel See staff proposal attached.
C7 Chapter V Sec. 21 1st Times for court not designated by Council. See staff proposal attached.
C9 Chapter VI /Sec.30 lst Who signs checks,documents and takes action Housekeeping matter - will be
needed from the 1st of January to date and dealt with in-house.
time oath is administered at the first
Council meeting?
PAGE 1 OF 2
1
m L
rj C N
cu
O
•tE) O H U Y
H I m G N
«1 C U
co N O C .L
7 H a L4 Q) C
W U N
U
V W H W U
m a w C
r_ to 1 m o a
o c
•., H ro W
U W H U r-1
U UC U C•-1
t3. > W L .r1 W
O C O Y
C P U W 1
T -+ O N t m U
C N d v U m W
m V a N m b W Oil H W W
U d)
m W H m C v .0
U m t� W 0 O C C u
y H ••+ U u H O U O W w W•r1
W •o C m a •� u U C C C > H
U •O L O N t1. .'-� •y •.� .-Wi .0 U H O
�a
y_ n •� H fn •.-1 tU r1 u m U al w C U Y 3 C! O H U V1
O--+ V o o W H •O W U H
U Y U Y 1 1 Y U a.H j _ N W o w
m y a m o m u
W m Um H m \ W m m
v
C7 •O -0 O ) U U b H O U H O W W
Q U C m
W 5 U W C L U a) L G o W o O. N O
U U G .0 W C O W C C W m O-.� 7 L •r1
H U .0 6 W H m •.-� u m O C
w '•1 U a a H U C .a) Y (1) > Y u .c) U �--� H O
a > > U u'1 W•r) O) m H > •.-1 N b U > o•r1
O N 4) m O O m a t'1 C b m •� b O b to N m O C b Y
AC m .o A C m •.+ H C G b .n •t1 .0 C ,m o H U
to W n o t W W y o + R. O 7•r1 W W W '3 u a W •ri o W
y o P. o P. a O E a W o +� u,0
a O U O C m m U O C a C U •O O m u." i.1 U m U to U
W w H O W W H O -4 W Q u W m > Y W U CY.
O O , "..-1 N P.•.d a •--� N C) W .-� to W
a 14 W Y a) U W Y m p W T b u W H W rJ T y
n Pa OU a u E W b U 7 y Y a E W U W E y Y•.i
a a W W a C N O N U•r1 U N 7 0 (u O) W v•ri.0
a Y m to y a W to x C a U C to to u to a to to U U
ti
N O
CH7 N
b �D
to a C N O
O m
w C O ^ v1
c)
M h ( W p L h N 1
Y C O m O O 'b N� O O a
N M
EO O 44
u U E-t u pCj O p ? N O ~
qc� N ^ N u
y y y W N > "' N N a
O w' s > CO W. N coW N .--1 N P.
1 L O m
a En
O 1--1 14 W OO Y .W r--1 H F d O W
H W o C4 m
L H H M .r01 a a U a U N
.+ m
1 •r1 a) H +j Hu t JWi U 1 to C H
4j jj C7
O. 0. a o C 0 0 m L C O u
,z1 o W W 3 G &� o o a.1 < •.Oi m •Y-1 w
H -.m-1 U V U .-•1 a H a Y C Y W
i-. C h a a 0� .-'t U O a O
W m t4 W Y 1 C m u O th .-U-1 Y C
a
Q " V -AY .0 .-•1 W W ...{ L H a U C O
1..1 0 -rUi cLo
4 b +� C C g .-t ra , N
U N N O T O b W rz a +a+ a) a m
W m H N W a H•.-1
O O •p Y L b m—4 o U O Y H 0. a 4) o a
U W U C C W 4j Wpm 3 co o. H
o o -•'4 H O a' N C1 a U m ... W
z m W A x U W v rN+ .w.
1 W H u1 U
O C o 1
N 1 U ab
.1 O d a
OCG C.'J N Y CT ..-t
W44
Y yo U '44
W
42 w 1 e e a W
W W O e
.n a .4
to C F. C 1
1 .-•1 t o o •r1
O cll N Cl) +7 •r1 .s •rl U W
w 2clv O v U H u o
d U �?
C4 OH U U U U v m O C W
A H to a a U U_
1 W \ \ \ H y U
yy to H E T Y a
y H H H \ \ \ N Y
HH O u o u
N c4 H H H 1+ i+ t. t4 m •-1 a
to W a a a tU a 1' a a o )' a r-t a
H H u Y Y Y Y v Y Y Y m W
w a 0. P. w cu Y n a •' •4 T
3 d W W W W W W W W }' m u
' U U U U U U V U U U ul
O
W u �' N W L O
.On
W � •• W T C
ilo,
WU Y U 7 C m toGO O c, r+ N N N ." O O C utv U U U U U V U V U Ci O a U U U G 4 0
� l
June 15, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Administrator, Bob Jean
Subject: Water Contract Extension Reqs st
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution on Monday evening.
This in no way indicates a decision on the part of the City. However, it
is necessary, to formally request an extension to the Portland contract
to ensure all options remain open.
lw '
i
z
C11Y OF TICA R
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
June 17, 1982
MR. WILLIAM A. MONAHAN
111 CHATHAM ROAD
BROCKTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02401
- SU13JECT:.-- T•IGARD-DIRECTOR--OF--PLANNING. AND. DEVELOPMENT POSITION
Dear Bill :
As we discussed after the Assessment Center and personal
interview, I would like to offer you the position as Tigard ' s
Director of Planning and Development. The starting salary
would be $2, 609/month ($31, 308 annual equivalent) for the first
six months with a review at the end of that six month proba-
tionary period for a possible 5% merit increase to $2, 740/month.
The City will assist with relocation by paying moving expenses
up to $1, 000. I would expect you to start on or before
August 1, 1982. Please notify me by letter of your decision
by June 30, 1982.
On a personal note, I want to convey to you how pleased I his
with your application and strong showing in the Assessment
Center. I am confident that you can handle the full range
of the position and that you will really enjoy the Tigard
community.
Please feel free to contact me if I may be of any further
assistance. I look forward to your formal acceptance.
Yours truly,
CITY OF TIGARD
6_11&
Robert W. Jean.
City Administrator
RWJ : dkr
(, CC: Mayor and City Council
P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171
rrf J
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
WESTERN DIVISION
14655 S.W.OLD SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD June 15, 1982
BEAVERTON.OREGON 97007-6198
(503)643.5454 EXT.276
David Evans
12420 SW Main Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: WD12-135 Amount Due: $262.10
Moved 19' wood street light pole to clear for bike path.
We have mailed several reminders to you regarding this
billing and have not received any response.
If there is some problem with this billing we would like
to hear from you. Otherwise, we have no alternative than
to refer it to our legal department as a collection item.
Sylvia Dominguez
Customer Accounts
Colleen M. Yandle
Amended items - O.P.E.U_/T.M.E.A. - City Of Tigard agreement
Item # 1. Alfred Dickman and Russell Williams to go from Step "E" Utility
Worker I to Step 'D" Utility Work II, effective July 1, 1982, and
be provided all necessary training to gualify them for that position.
Both will be eligable for merit increase steps of July 1, 1982.
' E "
Item # 2. Robert Dunn to be re-classified from Step "E" Utility Worker I
to Step "F" Utility Worker TI. Robert McNatt to be re-classified
from step "E" Utility Worker,to step "F" Utility Worker II. Both
employees to be provided all necessary training to qualify them
for that position_ effective Tnlyl,_ 1982.
3 - Cindy Cranston to remain as Accounting Clerk, Randy Stevens remain as
Billing Clerk, and the senior accounting position will not be added at
this time. Job enhancement or reclassification effecting these posi-
tions will be negotiated.
4 - All Clerk I positions , Diane Jelderks , Pat Robertson, Lawana Murray,
and Penny Liberty, jobs will be evaluated by Labor/Management to
determine which position will be classed as Clerk II . Salary will be
adjusted accordingly from the Labor Management study effective July 1 ,
1982 . The Study will be completed 30 days of last dated signature .
5 - Salary increase will be as follows : 4% July 1 , 1982 . 4% November 1 ,
1982 .
6 - If it is necessary to effect a layoff or re-organization no position
within the OPEU/THEA Bargaining Unit will be laid off or reorganized
until nego iations have been completed by OPEU/TMFpA a the City of
Tigan
7 - Positions addressed in the, unit determination with the Employment
Relations Board will be an item for bargaining at the next contract
opening .
Crew Chiefs and Section Heads will remain intact .
1-
PARAGRAPH #6
If it is necessary to effect a layoff or
re-organization, no position within the
OPEU/TMEA Bargaining Unit will be laid off
or affected by reorganization until the City
and the Union have met and discussed the
affect of such action on the employment level
prior to finalizing and implementing the City' s
decision. The City agrees that it will make
any future budgetary reductions affecting the
Bargaining Unit on an across-the-board or
city-wide basis.
�t
u
C1 OF TWAMW
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
TO: T. U.R.A. ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FROM: JOY MARTIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSIS^1ANT �
DATE: JUNE 16, 1982
SUBJECT: LIST OF PROJECTS
Following is a list of potential projects the committee
generated in a brainstorming session at the June 9, meeting.
It is now time to be creative. Prior to the next meeting,
each member should meet with their subcommittee to add to this
list, begin to prioritize and form a vague "dream picture" of
what the area can become. The next meeting is scheduled for
July 7, 1982, at 7: 30 p.m. , at the Durham Treatment Plant.
STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS ACTIVITIES
Railroad to Road, Parking Street Vendors
Sidewalks Street Entertainers
Lighting Roller Skating
Bridge (Inside/Outside)
Parking Bike Paths - Loop
Intersection at Main & Burnside Bandstand - Gazebo
Streets & Signals: Traffic Flow Bike Grand Prix
Channel Fanno Creek Activities, Program Director
PLANNING "COSMETIC"
One-Zone Trees
Selectively Encourage Certain Drinking Fountains
Business, e.g. , Small Benches or Seating
Non-Industrial Park
Covered Walkways
THE BASICS
Sewers
Storm Drainage
cc: T.U.R.A.
dwq P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171
newsletter
nuts bol Cs .lune 14, 1982
REPORT Ronald Hellbusch, CM, Brighton, Colo. (pop. 12,773) , has a performance appraisal
CARD system that he uses yearly to check his "self-concept"--he asks city department
heads to assess his performance. Questions include "Is the city manager decisive?"
and "Is the city manager technically competent?' Hellbusch feels this method of
subordinate appraisal provides him with the necessary information needed to
Improve or strengthen areas of performance or behaviorwhich leads to a more
effective and productive working relationship with them. He makes the point:
"After all , as city managers we should be concerned that our performance does
not inhibit that of our subordinates." Anyone interested in obtaining a copy
of the appraisal form should contact Ronald A. Hellbusch, City Manager, 22 South
4th Avenue, Brighton, Colo. , 80601 , 303/659-4050.
FASTER Downers Grove, 111. (pop. 42,600, James Griesemer, VM), has created the Public
THAN A Service Response Team (PRST) to provide "prompt and reliable public works
reponse and animal control ." Every jurisdiction faces the question of how to
FLYING provide an immediate response to public works problems that crop up zt any time
BULLET of day or night. The traditional way local governments have faced this is by
using public safety officers as a quick stopgap or by shifting the work of public
works employees away from their scheduled work to meet the request-for-service
needs. To meet the village's emergency off-hour and request-for-service needs,
six positions have been shifted from the water and street departments and a five-
member response team--PRST--has been created. In the month after selection of
PRST members, they received extensive training to prepare them for many of the
possible problems. Operating under a set of priorities, the team provides a
first-line response to situations requiring a greater commitment of per
Pians call for the village's Operations Center to dispatch the team. For
further information, contact William Barlow III , Assistant Village Manager/Director
of Public Works, Civic Center, Downers Grove, Ill. , 60515, 312/964-0300.
BOOK The city librarian of Tigard, Ore. (pop. 14,286, Robert W. Jean, CA) , recently
came up with an idea worth sharing. A long-time patron of the Tigard Public
CLUB Library wanted to read a just-published book that the library also wanted but it
was not on the "order immediately" list due to a limited book budget. The
patron suggested that if the library would purchase the book at the library's
discount price, a personal donation would be made in that amount when the book
arrived. The patron was the first to read the book, received a tax deduction,
and the library obtained a book it wanted but could not afford. All books
purchased in the "Give-A-Book" program must be consistent with the library's
book selection policy. For further details, contact Robert W. Jean Ili , City
Administrator, City of Tigard, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Ore. , 97223, 503/639-4171.
STOCK In 1980, Abington Township, Pa. (pop. 59,084, Albert Herrmann, TpM) , initiated
a program to review and analyze the management, investment return, and philoso-
OPTIONS phies governing the township's two municipal pension plans. For several years
preceding 1981 , Abington had placed the management of both pension portfolios
with a Philadelphia bank whose investment philosophy was "conservative." In
this arrangement, Abington's assets were co-mingled and managed with pension
money from other bank clients. A report showing a lackluster performance
precipitated the establishment of a citizens advisory committee to review the
pension plan investment philosophy. Working in concert with the township
administration and actuary, the advisory committee conducted a detailed analysis
7
11VF0
T I G A R D P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N
REGULAR MEETING - JUNE 8, 1982
1. President Tepedino called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The meeting
was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard,
Oregon.
2. ROLL CALL - Present: President Frank Tepedino; Commissioners Don Moen,
Geraldine Kolleas, Richard Helmer, Bonnie Owens, and Roy
Bonn. Absent: Clifford Speaker (excused), Susan Herron
(excused) and Mark Christen.
STAFF: Planning Director Frank Currie; Associate Planner Elizabeth
Newton; Support Services, Patt Martin; and City Attorney, Ken
Elliott.
3. The minutes of the May 18, 1982 Special Meeting/Study Session were con-
sidered. Commissioner Moen revised his comment on Page 3. Commissioner
Bonn moved, and Commissioner Helmer seconded, for approval of the minutes
as modified. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Commission present.
4. COMMISSION COMMUNICATION - None at the present. time.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• President Tepedino opened the Public Hearing by reading the usual
statement of authority for the procedure to be followed in the
meeting.
5.1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 1-82 Penterra Corporation NPO #7
• (POSTPONED)
5.2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 1-82 Reiling NPO #1
ZONE CHANGE ZC 9-82
A request by Marie Reiling for a revision of the City of Tigard's
Comprehensive Plan map from multi-family to Main Street Commercial
and for a zone change from A-12 to C-3 on property located at 12665
SW Hall Blvd. (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2AD, tax lots 700 &
800)
(a) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
e NPO Comment: The members of NPO #1 had no problem with the change
In zoning since this is part of the urban renewal area.
• Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation that the Plan-
ning Commission approve the proposed request based on staff's
analysis and all applicable planning policies.
o Applicant's Presentation - Allan Paterson, 11605 SW Manzanita,
Tigard, Oregon spoke as the representative for Marie Reiling. He
stated the area was originally zoned as multi-family. The plan was
for plots to be combined to form large plots for multiple family
residences. This has not happened. Apartments were built and small
residences are still there. The lots have not been combined so they
are still too small for multiple family structures. With the down-
town urban renewal process going on in the area, he felt this zone
change was appropriate.
(b) PUBLIC TESTIMONY
o Fred A. Anderson, attorney for Marie Reiling, spoke in favor of the
zone change. He stated the staff recommended it and he had not
heard anyone oppose it.
• Gary DeFrang, Lawyer, spoke for Bill & Peggy Goetze who own tax lot
600 next to the subject area. Mr. & Mrs. Goetze oppose the zone
change because they do not want to suffer the possible adverse con-
sequences of commercial zoning. It is presently designated multi-
family and has developed as multi-family with apartments in the area.
He felt that since LCDC recommends higher density in some areas,
this zoning should be left as multi-family. Also NPO #1 only heard
from Mrs. Reiling and not from Mr. & Mrs. Goetze so they did not
oppose the zone change.
(c) CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
• Staff stated Mr. Goetze had come into the office previously and did
not oppose the zone change but also did not say he was for it.
• Mrs. Reiling stated the Real Estate business has been there for at
least 10 years on the property to be rezoned.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
(d) COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
• All Commissioners felt the zone should be changed from A-12 to C-3
since the area has already been commercially used. They felt the
downtown commercial area is expanding towards that area.
• Commissioner Owens moved, and Commissioner Kolleas seconded, for
approval of a zone change from A-12 to C-3 on the property located
at 12665 SW Hall Blvd. (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 2AD, tax lots
700 & 800) based on staff's findings with the 2 conditions.
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Commission present.
PAGE 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1982
5.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 2-82 Milligan NPO X63
ZONE CHANGE ZC 6-82
` A request by Dick Milligan for a Comprehensive Plan Revision from
Urban Medium Density residential to Commecial Residential and a Zone
Change from C-3 (General Commercial) to C-4 (Residential Commercial)
for the site.
(a) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
s NPO Comment - The NPO #3 members recommended that the site be zoned
C-4 (Residential Commercial).
a Associate Planner Newton made staff's recommendation that the Plan-
ning Commission recommend to the City Council that the Comprehensive
Plan designation be changed from Urban Medium Density residential to
General Commercial, and that the zone C-3 (General Commercial) be
retained based on staff's analysis and surrounding land uses.
® Applicant's Presentation - Dick Milligan, 15933 SW Bull Mountain
Road, Tigard, Oregon wants to purchase the property at 9960 SW
Walnut, Tigard from James Moellman and Mary Ann Banky to establish
an antique business . He stated next to this property is a Circle K
store and two service stations. He thought the zoning was A-12
(Multi-family) and not C-3. In going to an NPO #3 meeting and after
discussion, they felt the best zoning would be C-4 (Residential
Commercial). However, since it is C-3 he is satisfied with the
zoning as is.
(b) PUBLIC TESTIMONY
e Ryan O'Brien, 140 NE 3rd Ave. , Hillsboro, representing Dick
Milligan, stated they would agree with leaving the zoning as C-3
with the exception of condition X62. (Dedication of additional 10
feet the width of the subject property.) He felt the dedication
should be made at the time of occupancy. He stated the house would
be preserved on the property and the antique business would be com-
patible with the surrounding area.
e There was no opposition.
(c) CROSS EXAMINATION AND REBUTTAL
o Planning Director stated he had no objections to dedicating the
property and filing City forms at the time of occupancy but stated
the words 'prior to occupancy' should be in condition #2.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
(d) COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
e Commissioners Helmer, Kolleas, Bonn, Owens, and President Tepedino
agreed the dedication should be filed prior to occupancy.
PAGE 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1982
e Commissioner Moen agreed if the house is retained.
® Commissioner Kolleas moved, and Commissioner Moen seconded, to
recommend to the City Council that the Comprehensive Plan desig-
nation be changed from Urban Medium Density residential to General
Commercial and that the zone C-3 (General Commercial) be retained
with the three (3) conditions. Condition #2 should be changed to
read: "The applicant/owner shall dedicate an addtional 10 feet of
width of the subject property prior to occupancy. Such dedication
shall be completed on City forms."
Motion approved by unanimous vote of Commission present.
5.4 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 23-81 NPO #1
An appeal by NPO #1 of the Planning Director's aproval of a minor
land partition to partition 4.8 acres, zoned A-70/80 multi-family
home for the aged into 3 lots; 4.0 acres, .3 acres and .5 acres
respectively on property located at 13055 SW Hall Blvd. (Washington
County Tax Map 2S1 2DA, lot 400) This item was continued from the
May 4, 1982 Planning Commission meeting.
(a) PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
• NPO Comment - No report. It was stated that the report was given at
the May 4, 1982 Planning Commission meeting.
• Associate Planner Newton read the memo that was presented to the
Planning Commission. Staff has attempted to reconstruct the dis-
cussion and action that was taken by the development standards for
the A 70/80 zone.
• Applicant's Presentation - Dick Sturgis, representing his father and
mother, stated the whole initial concept was to have the convenience
store so the elderly would be able to walk to the store not drive.
According to the plan, the convenience store will be connected to
the residence with a covered walkway. He stated the only objection
heard from the NPO is the safety factor. With the covered walkway,
the safety factor should be solved.
(b) PUBLIC TESTIMONY
• There was no opposition.
(c) CROSS EXAMINATION & REBUTTAL
0 Commissioner Helmer questioned if the residence or store would be
built first. He felt the store should be internally built and the
people could support it alone.
PAGE 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1982
® Sturgis stated the residence would be built first because the store
could not survive without the support of the people living in the
residence as well as the general public.
® Commissioner Moen felt the property should not be split and the pro-
ject should be built in one phase.
® There was lengthy discussion on whether the convenience store should
be built separately, accessible to the public, or for tenants only
and also where it should be built (towards the back of the develop-
ment or the front). Most Commissioners felt the store needed public
support to exist.
o President Tepedino suggested one of three things.
1. Recommend a modification of the ordinance to the City Council.
2. Send the entire matter to the City Council.
3. Approve the MLP as the intent is stated in the ordinance.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
(d) COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
• President Tepedino asked for staff's suggestions or feelings.
s Planning Director felt the following three proposals were consistant.
I. Enclosed with the main living unit.
2. Constructed internally for the use of the residents of the
complex.
3. Located within the residential structure.
He stated condition #3 should read "The convenience store shall be
constructed to connect to the building in which the living units are
located. Said construction shall be as a common wall along the lot
line." This statement would be consistant with the proposal.
® Commissioner Bonn moved, and Commissioner Kolleas seconded, for
approval of the minor land partition (MLP 21-81) with seven
conditions. Condition #3 changed to read "The convenience store
shall be constructed to connect to the building in which the living
units are located. Said construction shall be as a common wall
along the lot line."
Motion approved by 6-1 majority vote of Commission present,
Commissioner Helmer voting nay.
i
PAGE 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1982
6. OTHER BUSINESS
Staff reminded the Planning Comission of the June 22, 1982 meeting.
Commissioner Helmer asked about the progress of the Comprehensive Plan
Review. Staff stated a lot of work has been put into it. Now it has to
be put together. It will be presented to the Planning Commission to act
on in the future.
7. Meeting adjourned: 9:20 P.M.
Patt Martin, Secretary
f ATTEST:
Frank Tepedino, Planning Commission President
f'
PAGE 6 — PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — .NNE 8, 1982