City Council Packet - 05/24/1982 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA an agenda item needs to sign their name on
MAY 24 , 1982, 7:30 P.M. the appropriate sign-up sheet(s) . If no
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL sheet is provided, ask to be recognized by
LECTURE ROOM the Chair.
1. REGULAR MEETING:
1. 1 Call to Order and Roll Call
1.2 Pledge of Allegiance
1.3 Call to Audience , Staff and Council for Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda
2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one
motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed for
discussion and separate action. Motion to:
2. 1 Approve the Minutes: May 10, 1982
2.2 Approve the Expenditures and Investments: $ 612,650.79
2.3 Receive and File Financial Monthly Report for April.
2.4 Ratify NPO X63 Appointments
2.5 Recruitment of Executive Secretary Approval
2.6 Receive and File City Limits Map Report
2.7 Receive and File Memo re: GTE SDR Conditions
2.8 Resolution No. 82-46 Approval to Set Public Hearing on Angelynn Subdivision Vacation
2.9 Resolution No. 82-47 Approval to Appoint Lowana Murray Deputy Recorder for
Municipal Court Purposes Only
2. 10 Resolution No. 82-48 Adopting Final Order - Storer/Metro-Saxon I Variance
2. 11 Written Communications - Receive and File
• Transmittal from Washington County re: Non-City/City Subsidy
• Transmittal from MACC Chairman re: Telecommunications Administrator Position
• Transmittal from USA re : Proposed Rate Increase
• Transmittal from Chief of Police re : Report Procedure on Street Light Outages
3. PRESENTATION OF KEY TO CITY - To Pat Hutchison
• Presentation by Mayor and Council
4. ORDINANCE No. 82- Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 82-20 - Main Street Development
• Recommendation of City Administrator
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING (Items 5 - 9 will be rescheduled for 6-14-82 Hearing)
5 . ZONE CHANGE ZCA 2-82 (Tozer-Sims) NPO #4
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 3 lots located on the north
side of Hampton between 69th & 70th, from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard
C-P, Commercial-Professional.
o Public Hearing Opened
• Motion to continue to June 14 , 1982, 8:00 P.M.
6. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 3-82 (Durham Island) NPO #5 & #6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 238.64 acres located
generally north of Durham, west of 74th, south of Bonita and east of Hall Blvd.
from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-5 and R-7 Single Family Residential.
s Public Hearing Opened
• Motion to continue to June 14 , 1982, 8:00 P.M.
7. ZONE CHANGE 'LCA 4-82 (Alderbrook Island) NPO #6
A request by City of Tigard to change the zoning on 110.5 acres located between
109th and 96th and between Kable Street and Murdock Street, from Washington County
RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 & R-10 Single Family Residential.
• Public Hearing Opened
o Motion to continue to June 14 , 1982, 8:00 P.M.
8. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation) NPO #3
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on property located generally
west of 121st and north of Gaarde Street from Washington County zoning to City
of Tigard R-7 & R-10 Single Family Residential.
• Public Hearing Opened
0 Motion to continue to June 14 , 1982, 8:00 P.M.
9. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 7-82 (North Dakota Annexation) NPO #2 & #7
A request by City of Tigard to change the zoning on 180 acres located generally
East of 115th Avenue , West of Greenburg Road , North of Tigard Street , and South
of North Dakota Street from Washington County zoning to City of Tigard zoning.
e Public Hearing Opened
® Motion to continue to June 14 , 1982, 8:00 P.M.
10. GENERAL PLAN REVIEW CPR 13-81 & SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT M 1-82 - THE MEADOWS - NPQ, 417
An appeal by Bruce Kamhoot & Associates of the Planning Commission's decision of
denial of a Planned Development General Review and Sensitive Lands Permit at 106th
Avenue and Black Diamond Way (Wash. County Tax Map 1S1 34DA, Tax Lot 2600). The
matter is to be reviewed by Council on appeal by the applicant pursuant to Section
18.84.250 (b)(1). This matter is to be heard pursuant to Section 18.84.290(b)
and the review will be confined to the record of the proceedings. No new evidence
or arguments will be allowed; however , parties. are invited to submit written
arguments only pursuant to Section 18.84.290 (b) . Such arguments shall be submitted
to the City Recorder not less than five (5) days prior to Council consideration.
During Council consideration, Council may pose questions to staff and parties on
` policy issues.
ALL '` s Consideration by Council.
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING CONCLUDED
11. WATER REPORT
11. 1 Tigard Water District,_ Superintendent Bob Santee
11.2 City Staff and Consultant
11.3 Discussion
12. BID AWARD - Street Improvement Projects
Recommendation City Staff
13. BID AWARD - Architectural Barrier Removal
o Recommendation City Staff
14. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item
1.3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City
Administrator prior to the meeting.
15. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to consider
the following items: Under ORS 192.660 (1) (e) Property Transactions; Under ORS 192.660
(1) (f) Labor Relations.
16. ADJOURNMENT
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 24, 1982
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
REGULAR METING MINUTES - MAY 34, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian (arrived at
7:44 P.M.) , John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla, Nancie Stimler; Director
of Public Works/Planning Director, Frank Currie; City Recorder/
Finance Director, Doris Hartig; City Administrator, Bob Jean;
Legal Counsel, Ed Sullivan; Office Manager, Loreen Wilson.
2. CALL TO AUDIENCE, STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA.
(a) Bill Knutson, Director of TCYS, requested Council pass resolution to place
TOYS levy issue on the June 29th special election ballot. He stated that
the levy passed by 1 vote at the 5-18-82 primary election, however, state
law requires this be hand counted to confirm the results. If the measure
fails to pass after the hand count, TCYS would like the opportunity to
go before the voters again. The deadline for filing on the 6-29-82
election date is before the hand-count will be completed on the 5-18-82
election.
Councilor Brian arrived 7:44 P.M.
Legal Counsel recommended Council approve the resolution and noted that in
section 3 it states that the measure should be included on the 6-29-82 ballot
only if it fails the 5-18-82 election.
RESOLUTION No. 82-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CALLING FOR A
SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE REGISTERED, QUALIFIED
VOTERS OF THE CITY A TA"_ LEVY FOR TIGARD COMMUNITY YOUTH
SERVICES, INC.
Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Cook to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(b) Bob Bledsoe, applicant for NPO #3 position asked that Council consider re-
scheduling the Bechtold Annexation Zone Change later than the proposed 6-14-82
Council meeting.
Councilor Stimler noted that since NPO #3 was just reforming that perhaps the
issue should be set over beyond 6-14-82 to give the NPO a chance to study the
issue further.
(c) City Administrator requested the following items be considered under open
agenda.
.1 Regional Transportation Plan Discussion
.2 74th Avenue LID Request
.3 Report on Annexation Issues and Voting Rights
3. APPROVE THE MINUTES: May 10, 1982
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
Sam
4. APPROVE THE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $612,650.79
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
5. RECEIVE AND FILE FINANCIAL MONTHLY REPORT FOR APRIL.
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to receive and file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
6. RATIFY NPO #3 APPOINTMENTS
Dennis Moonier, Alan Horiwitz, Milton Fyre,Herman Porter, Bernard Clark, Vittz
Ramsdall, Carole- Watkins, Bob Bledsoe
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to ratify Planning
Commission action by appointing listed persons to NPO #3.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
7. RECRUITMENT OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY APPROVAL
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to waive Section
2.2 of the Personnel Rules on job announcement requirements to allow the
immediate replacement of the Executive Secretary.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
8. RECEIVE AND FILE CITY LIMITS MAP REPORT
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to receive and
file City Limits map report.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9. RECEIVE AND FILE MEMO RE: GTE SDR CONDITIONS
(a) City Administrator recommended the following change on the memo:
Condition 1. (a) to read as follows:
"The dedication of all land on Lot 100 that lies in the Greenway/Floodway
as described in the Engineer's report to the City of Tigard, and"
(b) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to receive and
file memo as amended.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
10. RESOLUTION No. 82-46 RESOLUTION CONCERNING VACATION OF ANGELYNN SUBDIVISION, A
PLAT OF RECORD LYING WITHIN CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON
' JNTY. OREGON
(a) Staff requester tem be pulled from the agenda and set over to June 14, 1982
to allow time to nave a notary witness signatures on the petition as required
by state law.
PAGE.2' - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
(b) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to consider issue
at the June 14, 1982 meeting.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
11-- RESOLUTION No. 82-47. A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL APPOINTING LOWANA
MURRAY AS A DEPUTY CITY RECORDER FOR MUNICIPAL COURT RELATED
PURPOSES.
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
12. RESOLUTION No. 82-48 A RESOLUTION RE: APPLICATION OF SAXON I (Final Order)
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
13. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - Receive and file
o Transmittal from Washington County re: Non-City/City Subsidy
o Transmittal from MACC Chairman re: Telecommunications Administrator Position
o Transmittal from USA re: Proposed Rate Increase
o Transmittal from Chief of Police re: Report Procedure on Street Light Outages
(a) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Brian to receive and file.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
14. PRESENTATION OF KEY TO CITY
(a) Mayor Bishop stated that Pat Hutchison was unable to attend the Council
meeting, however Council wished to thank her for years of service as the
Chairperson of NPO #1 and noted that she was moving from the area shortly.
Consensus of Council was to direct staff to forward the key to Ms. Hutchison
by mail with an expression of their thanks.
15. ORDINANCE No. 82-25 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 82-20 FOR A TYPOGRAPHICAL
ERROR.
(a) City Administrator requested Council approval noting this would not change
the intent or conditions in the ordinance, only correct a typographical
error.
(b) Mayor Bishop stated this application has been filed by a relative of his and
he would normally not vote on this matter though there is no financial
conflict of interest; however, since this ordinance would only correct a
typographical error in the original ordinance, he would vote so as to not
hold this item over for another vote at the next Council meeting.
(c) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING
16. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 2-82 (Tozer-Sims) NPO #4
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 3 lots located on the
north side of Hampton between 69th and 70th, from Washington County RU-4 to
City of Tigard C-P, Commercial-Professional.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to set-over
public hearing to June 14, 1982 and have staff readvertise hearing.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
17. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 3-82 (Durham Island) NPO #5 & #6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 238.64 acres located
generally north of Durham, west of 74th, south of Bonita and east of Hall Blvd.
from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-5 and R-7 Single Family
Residential.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to set-over
public hearing to July 12, 1982 and have staff readvertise hearing.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
18. ZONE CHANGE ZCA 4-82 (Alderbrook Island) NPO #6
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on 110.5 acres located
between 109th and 69th and between Kable Street and Murdock Street, from
Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 & R-10 Single Family Residential.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to set-over
public hearing to July 12, 1982 and have staff readvertise hearing.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
19. ZONE CHANGE 2CA 5-82 (Bechtold Annexation) NPO #3
A request by the City of Tigard to change the zoning on property located
generally west of 121st and north of Gaarde Street from Washington County
zoning to City of Tigard R-7 & R-10 Single Family Residential.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to set-over public
hearing to July 12, 1982 and have staff readvertise hearing.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
20. ZONE CHANGE LCA 7-82 (North Dakota Annexation)NPO #2 & #7
A request by City of Tigard to change the zoning on 180 acres located generally
East of 115th Avenue, West of Greenburg Road, North of Tigard Street, and South
of North Dakota Street from Washington County zoning to City of Tigard zoning.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
4
r
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Mr. Bruce Clark, representing R.A. Gray Contractors, requested Council
not continue the public hearing but set it over to the 12th of July so
that zoning issues could be heard without being restricted by previous
ad.
(c) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to set-over public
hearing to July 12, 1982 and have staff readvertise hearing.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
21. GENERAL PLAN REVIEW CPR 13-81 & SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT M 1-82 - THE N,EADOWS -
NPO #7
An appeal, by Bruce Kamhoot & Associates of the Planning Commission's decision of
denial of a Planned Development General Review and Sensitive Lands Permit at
106th Avenue and Black Diamond Way (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DA, Tax Lot 2600) .
The matter is to be reviewed by Council on appeal by the applicant pursuant to
Section 18.84.250 (b) (1) . This matter is to be heard pursuant to Section
18.84.290 (b) and the review will be confined to the record of the proceedings.
No new evidence or arguments will be allowed; however, parties are invited to
submit written arguments only pursuant to Section 18.84.290 (b) . Such arguments
shall be submitted to the City Recorder not less than five (5) days prior to
Council consideration. During Council consideration, Council may pose questions
to staff and parties on policy issues.
(a) Legal Counsel advised Council that whatever decision is made tonight should
be tentative and that a final order will be prepared for adoption at the
next meeting.
(b) Councilor Cook questioned Legal Counsel as to what action Council can take
at this time.
Legal Counsel responded that Council has the right to amend the request,
deny it, or approve it. He cautioned Council to only pose policy questions
to the applicant or staff since this is not a fact-finding hearing since
they are included in the record.
(c) Councilor Cook stated if lots 8 - 18 were eliminated from the plat, he could
then approve the subdivision request. He expressed concern with placing
homes on fill in the floodplain.
Councilor Stimler stated that Planning Commission took an appropriate
action by denying the application due to the amount of fill being used.
She could only support building in the area if the excess fill were taken
out of the floodplain area.
Councilor Scheckla stated the placement of premanufactured housing in the
City follows the housing policy and he would support the application.
Councilor Brian expressed concern regarding the amount of fill placed in
the flood area, but supported the use of pre manufactured homes in Tigard.
(d) After further discussion regarding the amount of fill in the floodplain,
l Councilor Brian requested Council study the issue of allowing fill in the
floodplain and setting forth a policy on the matter.
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES- MAY 24, 1982
Is-milli aim
(e) Motion by Councilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Cook to remand the
application to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to redraw
the subdivision, perhaps with different road configuration, or replat to
achieve substantially less invasion of the floodplain area. They noted
this application is against City policy which states there shall be no
substantial fill in the flood plain area.
Approved by 4-1 majority vote of Council, Councilor Scheckla voting nay.
Consensus of Council was to ratify this action on 6-14-82 by adoption of
final order.
(f) Legal Counsel stated a final order would be prepared noting the application
must have minimal, if any, intrusion into the floodplain.
PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF MEETING CONCLUDED
22. WATER REPORT
(a) City Administrator reported that in October of 1981 Council had a
goal-setting retreat and at that time suggested that the City study
the water service in the City and look at taking over that function
in accordance with state law. Following that, at the November 23, 1981 Council
meeting, there was a goal setting time with all boards, commissions, and
the water district along with the fire district representatives. the water
study was placed as a medium priority with fees and charges placed highest
on the action list by Council. He went on to advise that the Chamber of
Commerce has now exprssed some concern regarding this issue and thus the City
on 5/5/82 contracted with Lee Engineering to conduct a preliminary study of
the district.
The Administrator stated that he in no way wanted to be critical of the
district, felt there had been good operations up to this point and wanted
to cooperate 100% with the district, however, felt that there needed to
be a study done of the long range wager needs and the cost of that service.
He felt that the engineer's report should be done by a third party and
thus contracted with Lee Engineering to complete.
(b) Duane Lee, President of Lee, Engineering, Inc. , presented a draft of
the analysis of the Tigard Water District. He stated the report had
been completed in less than three weeks and thus may have some areas
which need improvement. He discussed the summary of the report and
showed slides of the .Tigard Water District's tanks and equipment,
water technology and other water treatment plants in the area.
Walt Menuskee, Lee Engineering Inc. , discussed the water district financial
standing, rates, history of water availability and projected needs and
availability. He concluded by drawing Council's attention to the report
and the conclusion that for the short term, the Tigard Water District can
continue to buy water at the lowest price from anyone who is willing to
sell surplus water. But in the long term, the District must turn more
and more to other alternative supplies of water.
(See attached draft copy of "Analysis of the Tigard Water District for
City of Tigard" report.)
(c) City Administrator stated this presents some policy issues that the Council
and the community needs to deal with. Long term water issues need to be
PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
committed to now with a projection of the costs and a study of the
availability of water sources.
(d) Bob Santee, Superintendent of the Tigard Water District, appeared before the
Council with many of his Board members present to discuss the report as
prepared by Lee Engineering. He drew to Council"s attention various
areas in the report which were misstated or misleading. He noted that
the Board of Commissioners for the District have been looking carefully
at the long range needs for the district and have recently signed with
the City of Portland a 25 year contract. He expressed the District's
desire to use a combination of different water sources so as to not "put
all the eggs in one basket."
(e) After discussion regarding the Portland contract, consensus of Council
was to have Lee Engineering do a final draft of the analysis report and
present it to Council .on June 14, 1982. Mayor Bishop requested the City
Administrator discuss the concerns and water issues with Bob Santee
before the next time Council's hears the issue.
(f) City Administrator reported staff would like to consider this issue
again at the end of June and present some policy options and recommendations
to the City Council.
(g) Mr. Ken Morris, Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District, filed with the
Council a position paper from the fire district supporting the quality
of service being supplied by the Tigard Water District, and setting out
points which they felt merit consideration from the standpoint of total
costs for services rendered.
(h) Council expressed their appreciation to the Tigard Water District and
Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District for their presence at the meeting.
RECESS: 10:39 P.M.
RECONVENE: 10:55 P.M.
23. BID AWARD - Street Improvement Projects
(a) Director of Public Works reported bids were opened on May 4, 1982 at
3:00 P. M. and the following bids were received.
K.F. Jacobsen & Co Inc. $188,343.60
Cascade Construction Co., Inc. 195,453.76
Oregon Asphalt 206,119.00
Portland Road & Driveway Co., Inc. 215,044.52
Columbia - West Co. 219,124.20
Riedel International 222,284.00
Baker Rock Crushing Co. 229,869.96
Parker No Paving Co. 234,484.00
Tobey's Excavation 268,595.20
He recommended Council accept the bid of the apparent low bidder, K.F.
Jacobsen & Co., Inc. in the amount of $188,343.60.
t
PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
e
(b) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to accept the
bid of K.F. Jacobsen for $188,343.60.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council_
(c) Mayor Bishop advised Council that a citizen on McDonald Street had expressed
concern regarding the width of the improvement and requested staff follow
UP on the issue.
24. BID AWARD - Architectural Barrier Removal
(a) Director of Public Works reported that bids were received on May 14,
1982 at 3:00 P.M. and the following bids were received.
C.F.R. General Contractor $22,435.35
River City General Contractor 27,823.53
Frady Construction Company 82,602.00
He recommended Council accept the bid to the apparent low bidder.
(b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to accept the
bid of C.F.R. General Contractor in the amount of $22,435.35.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
25. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under
item 1.3 were discussed at this time. All persons were encouraged to contact
the City Administrator prior to the meeting.
25.1 REGIONAL TRANSPORATION PLAN DISCUSSION
(a) Councilor Brian stated each jurisdiction has been requested to make
response to the transportation plan and report back within the next
week. He covered the key issues regarding Durham Road extension,
Murray Road extension location and 99W corridor study. After some
discussion, Councilor Brian stated he would report Council's position
to the county-wide committee.
25.2 74TH AVENUE LID REQUEST
(a) City Administrator advised Council that John Skourtes is requesting that
the City hear the 74th Avenue LID request without reading a staff report
on the issue. Administrator felt there should be consideration of the
staff position on the issue during the public hearing process.
Consensus of Council to hear issue in the conventional way render provisions
of Tigard Municipal Code.
25.3 REPORT ON ANNEXATION ISSUES AND VOTING RIGHTS
(a) City Recorder reported that many citizens were expressing anger at
not being allowed to vote at the May primary-on City issues. She
reported that since many of the island annexation areas were annexed
within 90 days of th primary election, state law did not allow those
residents to participate in the City issues.
26. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into executive session to
consider the following items: Under ORS 192.660 (1) (e) property
PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
transactions and Under ORS 192.660 (1) (f) labor relations.
27. ADJOURNMENT: 11:50 P.M.
City Recorder - City of Xigard
ATTEST:
Mayor - City of Tigard
i
PAGE 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 24, 1982
Date MAY 24, 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City
Council on the following item:
(Please print your name)
1.3 -BALL TO AUDIENCE, STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA
Name, Address & Affiliation Item Description
n
-- C Glia �P-��/c �, !- e�'Gi •-l✓ `�
Z -;e Yk
0
Date MAY 24, 1982
. I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
I tem6-s-2-1\i p tion:
ITE4 5 - 9 ILL BE RE-SCHEDULED FOR 6/14/82 HEARING
Pro onent (for)) Opponent (against)
lame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
a
ARM
Date MAY 24, 1982
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item; (Please print your name)
Item Description I M #10 GENERAL PLAN REVIEW PR 13-81 &
SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT - THE MEADOWS - NPO #7
?roponent (for) Opponent O
_ pp (against)
vame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
I
1
i
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 2.ay 24, 1982 � .
PROGRAM BUDGET
Community Protection
Police 35,967.54
Public Works 12,263.58
Municipal Court 1,291.15
Planning 1,856.28
Building 1,049.85
Total Co=wnity Protection o 52,428.40
Home & Community Quality
Public Works 10,265.34
Social Services
Library 1,768.64
Aged Services
Youth Services
Historical
Total Social Services 1,768.64
Policy & Administration
Mayor & Council 986.27
Administration 1,207.30
Finance 2,000.12
Total Policy & Administration 4,193.69
City Wide Support Functions
Non-departmental 35,892.51
Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions; etc.) 17.829.03
Investments 400,000-00-
CAPITOL
00,000.00CAPITOL BUDGET
Communi ty Protections
Road Acquisition & Dev.
Parks Acquisition & Dev. 113.18
Storm Drainage
Total Community Protection 113.18
Support Services
Building Improvements (Sr. Cit. Ctr.) 444.79
DEBT SERVICE
General Obligation Bond
! fi 477.?5
Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses --�—+
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Contract 41,313.50
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 612,650.79
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
PROGRAM BUDGET MAY 31, 1982
Corrununi ty Protection
Police 10,587.47
Public Works X3,466.15
Municipal Court 283.30
Planning 1,807.69
Building 1,072.72
Total Community Protection 22,217.33
Home & Community Quality
Public Works 92,063.61
Social Services
Library _1 .,870.67
Aged Services
Youth Services
Historical
Total Social Services 1 ,870.67
Policy & Administration
Mayor & Council 1,229.04
Administration 1,463.76
Finance 1,825.86
Total Policy & Administration 4,518.66
City Wide Support Functions
Non-departmental 9,632.63
Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll. deductions, etc. ) 27.736_61
Investments 239,676.31
CAPITOL BUDGET
Community Protections
Road Acquisition & Dev.
Parks Acquisition & Dev.
Storm Drainage
Total Community Protection
Support Services
Building Improvements (Sr. Cit. Center) 286.08
DEBT SERVICE
General Obligation Bond
x
- Bancroft Bond & LID Expenses 27,954.16
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Contract
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 430.250.04
r •p 1
00
r 7 J
roHw in I
s+ 100
v 1d u N 1 1
ci 0 u
v
C,
o: a C-1
^
t'1 ^
H u u in .D .-+ J �D c'1 .�
U x N �D 01 1� N1 Cl
r-i .-+ J N cn 111
C'1 lD .--i - .•-i
LI)
O
ro N 01 J t•1
�Il
Jb
U0 C
�, o ^11
G W v N D
"I t'1
H f'1 pl lD I c0
u C CD In J lD r+ �•1 O O
3 7 O .1 'V M N lD ['1 1
En H .--i 01
H N
O x 7
w c w
o
rn
x ai G chi O uWy
1D
M
J ^
co Di W Ln
Pa
as-�
N O rn r+ o
• H W C O J c0 1'1
A
0.W 'D b .•+ �
H .sem.
W
w
x J
rn N
cd oo y b b cO0 n O
CU.�-i C cJ C O rn co
H ¢ V r4 W • t'1 c•1
J
W q a U J 1
O Gi J
�•+ W b b rn u1 J
^ u1 m
U H O 04 W .D N N
�+ N
O N
U b
O
Q1 J ^
+-i X u �
^
$4 ul ^ v1
y L lD D\c•1
•n J
b > ro
N u C
W s>~ W
lo uH C C N C1 cl 1, v1 V1 %D p%
U cD cc O O+ J .-•i J N %D co N
C w �p ri 1 f'1 %o — J J J N �
4f ^ 1'1 i!1 J c•1 J
C7 Ln +
d
U •-i cc J N " w O, O = m lD J ul cD co •D N
C N N N c0 -D c, N c0 •D � t'1 .-+ D1 to t'1
••i O ('1 p, J f1. •O •D coO O N ri m N m f'1 co J
.0 F. C O c0 co OO 1� O N J N p1 LD N ["1 ^ t'1 In co N
E Y O �-•i r-/ co N Nl .D lD •D u1 J N �--i fh N N h
O .4..'. •D /'1
U v v N
...i N
O Q N • N N C L N •
Cl A 0 o O v: Y V b +-i E J C L M O
U b w ::.� •-+ U u W E > E Y N E N O u W
C c a a1 x > H E a E x x 1+ o Y
cc 7 ri U ro a T H H m O .+ D. U H o M •p U
1+ W ro Y V > H 7 •.+ 7 d o 1 Y•.d
y U 6' LLl •.i •O O L L E H N Q• 1.i E S1 C b >
N O w Y C " C +-i Cl H T Cz] Q' F H ••-1 .-+ ••+ >`+
C aD N a X u O C H O N .d to w T •.+ > N
V.• H b ro L d .D c/ N .L Y .J L N ro O (n
H u aG C > •ti 6 s+ u s+ u ro u > H
[cl • cG U u ro �ti- C N 1+ b c0 Y •.-1 u O Y 1+ N ¢ c. i
[n t E Y Y d L al b 3+ Y ro '-i Y W u C L •'+ O Y
L; +� a
ro c •+ •+ c s o u o ro u c •.+ 6 E
v o m ¢ o w ¢ ¢,
115
C) C
.� U U I
q H Gs. O
Y. I
u cL u
C C
U v O U
cyan
Vl N r`
N Ln O
c0 b u 10
V �+ r`
U V n v
U X ✓� ao O Q`
O LI, 14
.a N b 'p O 01 O
V U C Ln to r` Cn
1 v --zr
rn n
cn ¢ .n •a
rn u rn 00
N W
10 10 .--+ co
p O Q\ v10
C1 w O n to N M
M co v N
N
00
O C •c!
C--+ C
O x
w c w
I
p 7 O
w c'1 .n rn
u v v1 00 v
x U C 0 O a0
ca x 4 v1 0
P.
• � H b 01 I-Q
N w10." C.W ./1 O^
CO N
W
W N
x
A W >1 O
a, O b O O O
C7 ? a 7 0 C `O N o0
OD
H ¢ O 05 w
H a a U
wO pqco
¢ N N v
Ca N n
Ff W b b ao O o+
H H W O �J N N
U Fq O C w
O 10
U 10
U y` 00 N O
ci v U` 10 O t�
cyn
E-4
u '�-' `�"
U
CC O C p` n o n
3. C•rc .0 rn
D > q N N O
01 U C
P, a �
C'1 cn Ln .-+ C" ttl O
q b n v1 C:)
N 00 ul
$4 C .-� N m 10 O C=) N
U 7 00 01' N O
c w to 00
U N u
U
W ap N cn Oh in to N N 00
C 10
OD O ifl .--� O C3, .-+ �O N O 00
•.-1 O H n N 00 .31 t� CD N m M m 00 ul O'
)r C coOn N cn r O W n d N N NI
U v O H �p N .�-i
N .--� v .-•1 In%O
0) q V y
1 dm 10
N Ol L
T H n a U m C U •C 0 W
q w .1 .0 d X U d O U C w a
U w 0G b b N q W q.0 •.-1 C L+ >4
to p y 01 V 1-. -O 0C:) p O U 7 .-+ W u q U
W q C t x U q w ` O ••+ c'O m cd C
H cTj H U O vI a N m cn
a O d O w C > C >
H C C + O C
N w� 01 O C O 7 U U U L
u ci W O w C 1,b p U U cn H U w L"
U s-. U
�1 U U GL x i+ >
U p
H U G m J 0/ p ca q w W O O
• a ¢ ¢ w Q A o w 3 a u '
•.1 N. b
U ✓� 7
L V:
v) d ti
S J
U
g 7
u W
W
G^
0.1 G W
•.a
K.
• •D
-Y U
GI L. W
a
u•n
cn o
F w c
O G
•nG 7
U
T �
W N G 0
U
H
q
z ,a
H
v a
X W
ca r- c
W d o ::) M'l
q �
z
•d A
q' W
C N Qco
�
C W Z
H ra 11
cc,
W W H y cn - S
o_
H O q 7 G� O
U H F+ G a N
r�Z U U N in
N W V -a aD
d i)
H
O N 'o O c" N oo S M
q :7 .G O N cD c', M �D O M �D GO N �D
Z x s N S O O �D S O Lr)
S O N r c-4
S NO
CU 7 V N GD r to .--1 �D S r r O
H H G W M un r .-� N a, r N N N r
O S
C U
O O
V O i
U r "D cD Ol M .--� W O r, u•1 M O' C:, N "D
S Vl M
G O Ln lo M .--� �D S GD M M %D .4 O M lD co N N lD
•.i O .--� N S O co �D O S O Ln M S N O N �o M Ln .--� O
,D 5 G N GD r ID r+ W %D S r M r Ln O
S V 0 Ln r r-+ S N O� r Ln N W N N r r
rc S
U v
O O O CT Cl, ♦D Cl Cl r O N Ll O vl
O � O O O N U'1 Vl r O S 'D O cfl Vl .D 01 �D
V dJ O O M M O v1 •� `D Dl lD O O S N 'O M Ln'i
C) 1 w 1
[b^ oo O 'o M O M CO lD Cl) Ln O O OT a
Ln O
-p CO N D1 N O M M O r C'l N N N S N r m 1
O C\ Ln N
cA -•1
O O M
S .--� 'D aD (71aD .-� cD S .O r � 1 N Ln 1 .-. S "D
h h W �1 M M S r N S N N O N O
r-1 In e-+ CT 10 CO N e-1 N %O N N S 1 r 4 ID 1 v v S v
U••„�
ON
Vl r-I S N N M N S N
a U) oG F m
GD G) U T H
m U N > xN •F�. U H .•7 Fro. f-l. H
.G > W % x L C) H ro uW . y p .4co
m Co m EnEl
.0 Co G4 y d xN > b . b W .r 7
T •d ++ Gr W ro ++ F O a O > q u cn > > G
N N W H N H >. GL 5 x d C) 7 n m
W C) N N H O G) F. OG) L .� 5 1 I u cn cn S• 3+
L N 7 L G G/ I Cn �G G)
W O GO O- as 7
H O U •.+ Fc +� O +' •") "� '-' O O N M' W w CO N O O O
= a s H cn W O G N U ,-1 v] Ux W W N S >o U U U O
W H W o ^
a ^
2 1 N D\ to r co a0 00 o
.1 O M M M O M M M M M cn M M MM c`-/ M M c••f M
W O
W M M
{
•ru m b .� N
Cil a:
3J b CA
c) W
co
c)•� G
O 7
W G W
O
tt a,
o O
Y U K O
(+ ar : O
a) w W
a
cn•0
(n O N
l a o N
O C O
ty 7 a0
N a7 W
Z U
N
eny b O co
py NO G CJ C .My
a a, oaw�
H U
H
a
� H
aL
X 6 o C
Q
T. Q
W u x 0u) rn
W cn
o ao
O
o >
w04 awn
d
H
w I' I CO O O
CI tJ b al Vl Ol O
W W 3-) K )cl O n .7 O
y.. U O n O a0 d N Ol
pHA H C k+ J N 00
F.C' U
O O
U W ,J
a.l m O O C) .O N 00 O t` .O N al aO CT
C Gl Lr)oo alO •--1 .-� n al f` N Ln O O
V
M O r-1 '1 a0 n u') SO Ln m d N
A 6 C IT O Co d N ON .--I C•1 O .D W .O
—4 a0
M
O .�.. O I7 N a0 d N H N
U�+
'O O O O O O O .o O O O O O O O w'1
U N O O O d O O �` O O Ln O O O O m
I
1' O O O O �7 O O O rn N c+'1 O )+Y O 1 I
N O O
c0 )n cn .O O\ a. O to _. %D N N n I rn {
•O C!i .O N �Y v1 �7 N N Ln •�
7 rn
CC ^
c•1 .O .O N O. O .O
C U O L,.e e--1 m co a0 e'cl r-) N N Ln O O
••-� C' d .•-) N Vl Cl Ol d N .O '7 N N m al
N aD c7 W J �T r-a .O (31 - N N v cl) v v N
pa v
G L m G
W L •.'i b N
.-� q v +� G ca o G a)
U C L Y a) .O En •L m W W
m a) U W m $4 •,F. m ca m Q
L U d"'i C4 W m a) -a U \ L a) U oo
6 a
4J1•+ W .•-� G O G a) a) c) u m .+ o
(. ca w \ C H W 7 x b W' a Cc a) d ad
a) m N w (+ m O W m G u cG G -
04 m :0 G O a) £ G •-+ H 7 r+ O .m m
N ••-t m
W0 o )a W 'o ca W a1 O a)
W G A b N \ •.� w N 1-) a) R: H Y+ C+ C+
a @ .+ v m w o a) v u v c) o x u v L m
W 7 •'c ,C a) L K 3 a1 m b •� C+ U G
V 3 rc o ++ C a.a a) C a) a) i.) o O a) ca a1 C1 O G -
•.+ W W PO O ••+ U m H U N V) d U Fu %'' P+ O PR H O
a w o
c�j cel M chi O c i O cn cn ch
LIN
O i
.-Mn Ln
en
n N
u N O
U U C
Cl N :7
\ N N
V1 N 01
tl N r CO
u G a+ O d
3 7 00 In r
u W M r
47 N
00 '
'6 b
OG
Ky O O
1y O 40
Y U C 10 M
3+ v 7 1n 01
10 a :.
a
L MO
to O r
H M
O C 10
•-� P 7
«f n W
1n aTi V 'O
w N " N C
a 0 0 a W
H
A
2
W H
w d a° w
a
�n
a -1
a v,a
H Z L X 41
F >x i H U
W W E y 4n
O d 7.
:. W R
E O .a d
~ O G
U 2 e3 S. C•,�
b >
w W a vii
Fes,
F
G
In ,..1 O1 O CY .-+ N c) N O O 'T O In
14 'b 1 M 40 N 'D CO r•1 r N �--i r
21 5ci r N 01 O co ,:r WLn W C-4
N 111 M
H E Z 14ci
N N
N C5
O O
U W
.J a0 r a) OO r 1D
C 7•. C O d' rl w N O O O N O N 4 O v O 11'1
..-/ O rl O N O N r -T M r O !b W 1D W r N In r
OG M a0 r O1 O d �7 M V' M N �t Ln 0D 1--1 N 11'1 M
r N Ol OD Ln r O 1D Ln 01 00 r-1 Vl 00 N
OM r N 10 N
U v N
v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4)N O O O O 01 11l O �7 O 1n O O M O O O O O O
Y O to O C M �7 O of olM O r O O O O 1r1 �7
OUO! d f0 r 10 O2 O O CO N O O M 01 N �7 %0
b O O\ O -7 �7 " O 1D CO N M
O O M N
1U I O t0 1/1 O1 I G1 O O O OD O M J 1/1 W r 10 O
1 O a, r r-1 b 'D r O r r-1 O N O 01 d O u1 O
•-C0
1 C r-1 N M N O1 1!1 r N 1 N 'D N Zr
n w n r M r 10 In N 01 M M M N -7 'T
C C.--1 Ln N '-A r .-r v v v
Cj ., n
m N 41 u
oo u
G C C 3a 41 'O N
O w O ro m C
N u •.1 E! •.d .0 N 7 OD
> OO 1'J N U H U C C7 d •.d b
U U 47 C
O E w C1 _
a u ro Co =; -4 O
S4 b d K 1. .HC W CU'J d N N 1+ N ro 14 19 1+ G
7 p b •.-1 41 L L �4 .� 41 •� m U .O 4/ U 17 41 4)
C3 C
N 7 O 41 O > P+ T M 1d u U (, 3 v n a1 w O
N y N O fn 1n W P. O G R. Z C7 U' O 1. Cf O N
N 1+ O
U N M d M Vn 10 r W M W — N M 'Zr O1 .Z ^ 01
1 1D 'on
1D 10 1D 1 00 CO CO M O 1 tT 01
O M Mm M M M M M M M M O M M M M M O M M
'O O 01
N
•.Oi m •'a O � O
C)
O `D
M
>r b c)
aw o
0L ( M '1
� N
O L 7I O O
vl
co
.a co
N
cox w
P
N
L•�•'1 n
ccn O M
H .v
H Cab J
D ,
� Mw
� U
rn
In u b b
ly c t G o G ol
P4 o z w co
H U
IAA
H
Q a W v�7i
lo
cm
6 C1
W
o �" i; x a61i co
H
F 7y uF +H+ co
cn pl .n
H O
H o N O
U Z c7 O C .O
H C•.+ �
W wzbci
d '
F �
rn
V. lo 000 a, n cO'1 J
7 Tww.... cn QDIM
F R U co N N
U W o
M J M M
^ W lO 'm m 1� N n Wco
O1 O N N
OLnco
N H H O I J
o v co. co
M
M O1 O M O oO J co O1 N O J O1 aD N
b 'D 'Do OO N n co D %D M
of N W M ll -1 C-1 OD N N
u W w w w w w wn 1 1
d I co O, N O N N r M ul N O O O
b oo cn M M �D coco
L✓1
!� N
c D� w
W M vl
I N N H N IO ill
•.� C co — rn Ol N O O N c-4
oo N t\ .-•� 1 H M M
E c,--� Ol M M Moo
U•.-1 CJ co
W W v
D.
W
X A ul
•EO 00 w O 6 V] +, M O C
Q! C •rl U � cJ .K,
W u •.C+ O C
q m w b H U o O 2 u wN
W H O N o) of W 'b
PG of HW of oG iJ L > C cn > U H m C U F
u U W 7 b 01 w U m U O
> m C H H •.� H 01 L N U W C x 'D w' H U d cL H
O cO C u CY. C
U W cYi
w > C t .--� a3 •-� a a. ,-+ W H O W ,--� •,� D
W H m O W u O H o 6 !• N W �'J •d N cn m z
O U L U H C H H of H s+ •.+ m PeGL
• N A A C O W of
1 — H H H N M O M H C 3 'd m of C m C7
O O F a s O U U O Cl u of +-+ O U N N D. O m
O J s J J J U W W w' w � P, w W d
• o W
J
21 N N N
En
U n D O O
Q m f
h h
H b
c1 c
,t O
CJ W
CD
•O C 'O
O -�' 7
CO L' w
v�
.0
x v c
H V 7
m a w
a ,
•0
� o
H
H r" .0 c
•n a. 7
m m w
:E: U
T
y r-1 •O b
od co
N O O
F U a W
tl
G
z a
H
PG� 0 C
z� d C4 W
6 G
H i w 4J x v
E+ W to M m H
> S " E-
ra
W F O
o a1-4z
U cc H C Ct
C i > N
H co
W3 •--, I N N h cn e-d h O O, J N h h N C7
N c'1
O O J 1 O 1:1
O .. N
Hm F C W O N O cD ' N O h r--1 .--1 J N c"1 J
N
O O
U ccr •O i .r
ch .--1 h O 01 J N h h O Ol
zr 01 tp J h .•-1 h O� tiD 1D J
-.C-f c0 C O O) O O O O7 M
w cn
N O %D 'D N w h N e-1 J N 1'1
O O cn
O� %D cr•'1 �D 4\ r- cCl .-1 oD C1 h O
C-3
v h %D e•t r--) N aD
O Oti 10 O O O c'cl N O O O cD c+'1 h `O U1 CA O h C7 N
b 'D Ln �O Oti rn O Co O O O O O .-+ CA O cc'1 ccl — W — O O�
U N f'1 't, J OD Q\ O O c'r1 O� O tf} O Cl O� J O� u1 N N h Cl �D
u 00 w w .. .. w w w w w w w .. w w w w w w w w
d 1 Ln Ol h J h 'D O 'D tiD c" 00 O J 01 J ti0 N J C7 h %D tiD N
w— c•1 `Q M O\ N C•1 cD O 10 N Cl N Q\ N ^
v vD O r4 rn
- rn vi
1 O cD h J c+1 h C, O J 00 O C•1 m cD Ln h %D tf1 W O h l'1 N uY
•� Tc] Irt C1`).,, N rD O, Ln N O M w M M -n O .-t M W r/1 n .-+ W r--r O MO
CJ oD N h Dti - c!1 r--1 h O� J t. O! cr'1 Oti J T ,!1 N N h C' h �?
11
0ra•'1 h c0 h h CD r--1 c`1 N O, 4n -4J h J O� J tiD N J cn h 'D N CID
C [J cn CO N cn N N cn h O N .-+ N M N
N O
L -d
cc CO L yJ
cn. - 6) U
W 14 O W U •.+ C C .0 U C 00
U — d T X v) 3+ •c7 •.a •O
' r--c > H 7 •'i •p a.r C r-) F
a p m o0 oD H m o E d H c� m v w
N U 'O M OD H H U CY. S+ to W •O r--r
U N W •.-1 •.t ..c H VJ d .--c P• C N C/ u O .14 -X b P4 m
U U c b CO .0 H m v •.1 C 3 M b •— H H m
W •.t •.� C N H b ++ O T U 'O u U N u Ol 0 m W O O •.-1
r-c C M •.+ .O G) O T +-r to C C U O O W I U p.
H •L
F
G' N c•1 �7 c+'1 — C'1 J
. G ._. C•1 C7 c'1 J J J ccl 10
Cs.
0
Gn O O 1� N
rrM O
of N C
.a v. O
u m c C4
O1 N a N ti N Gn
P.
CD O o
i+ 'C1
CD
cn
O t•1 t 1
C,C CI N C N N O
pa 'G W O O O
N
u•1 v1 C- �7
OOO a0 a
Y U C N N N q
w
1J•n H H r
y0 N U•1 Vl rn
H
•'-� P. 7 (71rn Obi 00
Co W
to � LsN •p 'O N
H �a py
04 WO� NNO+ N[NOD
NOO
NV
A
•T" �A 00 CO OO N
%W H -0 .d cnca
a 0cn
G cn [+1 m N
Z
Ln
d W
W Z y �O LO N
CD
O w Ef Z y N r+ .-+ .--i d
�a O
H O �
94
U H ro O C 00
IV IV
£ 'cf >
C +'
y I Co u�
c+1cn
O
W W u a N
N H G V d
0 0 N O rn n
O) 1� Ln O N CD V1
O E LryW t� N OO 00 O^ H
U v �7 v
O O 00 O N
•(7 �7 O �O �D
OOIn
N
N DO
pOp' I- m t` co
b p0co
N
7 rn
1 vi C V O O D N
6 G N tl•1 H U•1 H7
ri .7 CO O N
b vl y
W .cc W P.
O U i0 x 7 4
p: N O H w CL -.Ci O % H a
H U u .G T W W G W A H H
H O N u Ol a 14 2. co OI
A C (5 G ++ '27 W N W Ol •O
fW C L u O yy, O CLtai >C u v
a O �N 0l fA N O W G
W +� O) G O G E Cl. N 1+ 01
W CA t�.1 f0+ N H w C O O 7 0
O
w
H
V wci w L7
I
3 7�[n W
tai
C
O G :1
pq
V•O 1
0
�+ o
W N
W •O
H C
O 7
c m W
caro
T J
iJ .d •d N
C W C N
7 O 7 ^
y n C W N
W U N
EO-H
f-+
W ro C
W O .-
a� m w
w
zN
¢ oo +� c1
4 v v
•+ u Xv r.
W y ro H N
yy H hLn
> a
¢ c^a c
1
o v u H 1
a •o > m
F W v v
Z A W a N
z �
W
W
H x •4 O Oo Co �O N ,o
6 H .D .O W rn 1 1 1 I lO I 1 N 1 c'1 0 .n J
y C C h C^ ./1 O .D O rnaD O O %- O O '- O
(] v W o 04 I cn 1 a% I I ^ 1 1 oo 1 J N
W W U N N
z ac
mN H
M iY. •�
U W C O O oo 00 Vl Cl) to N Co
.a a .D CD M 1O CO �D N N Cl) O
^. C•1 to lO N a �O r1 N
c'n V1 Cl h co N
O�.I N •--I N N
U
C
L
c x
Im H
+ N
H ro L
U wv H
•.d ro
L W • U U 6 p V Elm 04
S
N
uJ N .2 N ro N s.] to C H
v t v W
X yr U N ro C 1 I H w v ^ u
FW N X v ro u v .O A p •.+ -.+ C ro F
ccv N > O u (1: 7 P � ro a `b v V H
>, •a v •a w w M u F v oG o cn y w u s v
H Wm H v H T ro v
V v N H H O C1 H O OJ CO N
W P. > - O V
W O ro >4 ••-1 .0 t" N CD W ro 7 u 'd u u 7 7 O .0 co of 6 •L1 .0
Y. H O U N L O u •.1 •.-1 +-� o O - W W O O O L U 7
zo ¢ R. .7 H W O Cd cn U .4 In U x W
W N
WO1 ^ N CT 1 N ('•1 J til •O CO C� 0� — N M Q, 1 N t+l a
O O O
O Cl C1 [+l O m m C•1 <•l m m f•t 'n (+l [•t cel M ("'f O Cl C1 m f•1
O
Y t'1 O
rn co
m N Ol cn
N N
ON N
u u b
O1 N C O�
O 10 A
I+ Ta:
N N M N
CJ
C
7 1 N
W W N
Vl
00
C Y C
O G7
CA•n W
V)
O O
O O
U a N N v
li w
a; o O
- $4
Ln
3+ 4+ C o� -.
y a W rl N
�0 cJ
O
L b b p^p
C cc C
W iicl
El
H Ln
A o b u1
Z G
w 0 O C
a a w
x
w
c
z
6
d +j
ar
w i x m
b W i+w
W
to v;
w
y
P.
au cc
IV (71
W S.. C-.G-I cn
o a, w p -
o v > m
p2 A W fd CO
£ W
6 H c', �•1 N O N O In
F = $4 b W T �O N O� I N
rn O Cl) G
q
W w C7
z x
W 'd .-I --i m co cn O O O .O 'O O O O CA
O O pO tr1 v1 n t(1 O m cn N O N N Ln ti � O O cn
O O n N O� Ln t` t+f !� .-•� O� .-r �O N N M N 01 N uy N
M O\ Cn N N --�
o O p N
p v
U
v)
W
N
rF-3 A O W
d G] W IUI
Z H u >
a c
al a b
u U twi. u tc.,
U
Q) w u H
t- C d y
x O N C GD C O a C Op
C Gl W W •.+ O ••1 C N N N
5 W u N a N 6 W y a '' •u H O N
F N 1+ Gl N N H a Gl CJ U L
s
^ V] N L w U DD 41 U U U •.-i U V L
43 U
w N W > cn N • N c N Q1 •.I .-a N ...I .,.�
a C y h G x a O w I+ U d x d O a a c u s4 z
O •-� O 7 m C w L W c:w cn a d O Um
— N
w� C W F 7 O C d U w w U
O W r cJ -Z N (n O to w r
u H N •.-1 N W •[7 C 34 34 )I
V) O N +� b C N O Y V •p U U A 'O •.+ U Gl U A +� Y .x d
W c u a) cJ
O W o b •'1 i+
7 C U O o �0 �
+-� O , C', a O C O U
U Fr [n V] [Y. U w w V) CA i--i p U :n N N to W :n R. C. O
N
of I — — N cn J .n an .O n c T
J �cl Ln Ln
O '1 O
ccli t••1 c'1 Ot•1 t'1 t+l C'1 c"1 Cl t'1 t'1 mC•'f C"1
J ✓1 'O
c i M cn
(n Q G If N
t`
1+ O
3 ^
Nn W N
G
G Y G
O C 7
Its•.1 [�
co
N
U T1
w U C
W 7
W
W 'q
la �p
O - 7
cj
P W
'I A
•
lo,,
>� O
C <n C M
C O 7 N
Cn O c4 W
W U
5
F �
H 'n
Z N G
W O 7
x
ca
N
in co O
cn
d d S
W•nJ b co
7 Dry: F
cn v
Wj 6
x cl oo rn
W 7 C
W H C I M
O Cl
Q •cJ > N
Ef
Z A W W Vl
4Z--S-S
co M co S M
O 1 1 �O I N .-•� N �O I 1 �O O�
y C) C .O O O : O O C O O O rn
1 1 1 I I
rW2 x c3 N M
H H
0 � n
O O C O 00 N -4
E £ O� � ^ O O O rn .•+
U N ^ n v O d
U
G/
0.'.
N
v7
G/
y
UI
W
[L' P
cn p p 1+ X
of . H w W
o H m A N C b
Z N .0 wL Z C O w V]
w N P. u W W a3 W
> C7w a C7 C X F ~N C > Z
C', H w a v . 1 u o a
) C O Sa w 'a N U U L'
to •"� d Z o W W U o U •.1 U 1' u c4
I--� y c� pp m W •.-I w O w W w t G C u
61 L•7 m to .�aO �
aGi m u y o u m L) I. cn o ¢ w o 0
R. Z C.D, Co O O Cl O N d E" o U H
W z —
I N M G1 I Q, 1 N M_
fA 07 OD 0p GD p. O� O O O
O M M M M M O M M 00
� M d
ro N
•rl N
o N v
rn �
C.) :3 o o
C/) < a
C:) o
H b
u G
3 7
� w
an
. c
•a•� v
G x C
O C 7
co••• w
w
V 'C
x � c
ro w
a
ai O
.•0
a v
1+ C
O 7 _
cu
d W
ro
2; U
T
L
Cob
C C
G O O
fA O C-1 W
W U
Pte.
H
H
H
A 'O b
Z ro C
"i a w
W
z
Q N L
q 0) Q1
to rn !•i X m
7 �
W N C•.-/
p07 > L
Q b > ro
.'E A
w
w
q O 'C 0% M O w O M
co 0 O lz CN N q 1 01 N q O\ O0 q to .t
= m M m q CD O� V1
uY w .N-1 N C\ .fid N
Z x �
N
H H
0
U � G O n q n W O ID O+ m 10 q In O O�
•�"� E '-1 N m d m N q m O, w q
O
A Ql C O N w q M u1 CO q Il l N
N y
OD
•Z N ro C3
W x •.1 ro 0 •C a
a 4 s. .•a ') m m
x o ro H N a
W 3 1+ N •d H N
7 N d u ++ •.� C fn > V b u 6)
.] u O a u G N G Gl 61 Cl 0
H .� •.-1 > o C E N C a 1+ O
P+ O ro OD 00 14 W E d ro N ro ro W >, V]
U CJ -.1 •.+ •.i S+ VJ ¢ •� v C V d 3 V o -�:
U u C •O N .0 i+ C', A •.� C 3 ro b •� H 3+ ro 7 A u
.d •.d •.1 G r-1 i+ U O
N 10 L m C C C7 cn (n W �'. P� W fx U O •Q
H C ro •.+ A 0
CO O N C pw o •.+ 00 O ro ••+ •.4 O O ro
H .a7
C
a N M -7 N M
W� �• — M M M 'cr cr �
O
i
c .
N
•N V1
N C
u u� C
P. vl a O N
V1 1 W N M
01
C. •O 6� O� O� O
EnU C:
C W rl M M
a�
C
O C a
n
� M1 M1 v
u .b N N N tl)
ac u c
O W
a
u o
cn s+ s a, co
H W C M1 M1 M1 W
O a mIlY
CI) m
O
11— M1 M1 M1
, o � In o o
O C W
wc� U N
5
►-1 �O �O �D "+
A
Nd b O O O vl
z C �O v1
W O a
a pf, W N N C-1
N
x
w
In
z
6 L OO 00 a0 N
N U U '7 �7 d• �D
Cn co L X U �1 �fl V1 CO
O O O T
W y En
W H
cc :3 G N N N t•"1
W H C•.-+ rr .-+ .•a M1
O d N S+ M1 M1 u•1
n v > ro
H w U U t co °� W
z A W W VJ
W
M1 N
y O U C
A u W M1
2 7C O N +
N H
b
O U O
t"1
•� _ N Ln O
O N C N
N V1 D
.d
W U
N N N 41
W C C +i ••� 3+ F+
u -4 u a
C7 W Q
U
U O 7•+ O 1-i b U 'O
0 11 fA ,C W U a N V] C N
cL' N p O K1 C C % CS > %
W
A v C c w w A c+ }+
w U N O O .0W N U
Cw. C H u rn i O >+ C
X N w w al C x O
Wrz
u v
u P m C y O d �' u
H O r+ W H O 7 0
p , /
May 20, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning Department
RE: NPO #3 Memberships
On April 28, 1982, the NPO #3 Selection Committee recommended the following
individuals for membership to NPO #3. On May 18, 1982, the Planning Commission,
after a public hearings process, gave their approval and recommended that the
list be sent to the City Council for their consideration and approval_
Dennis Moonier lives inside the city
Alan Horowitz lives inside the city
Milton Fyre liven inside the city
Herman Porter "lives inside the city
Bernard Clark lives outside the city
Vittz Ramsdell lives outside the city
Carole Watkins lives inside the city I
Bob Bledsoe lives outside the city
{
` .(Loa Ane Mortensen, already appointed, lives outside the city. )
1
E
I
i
: I
- i
1
i
I
I
- i
• i
i.
1
i.
Y
b�
�.S
1
C17YOFTWARD
May 17, 1982 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
Mayor and City Council
City of Tigard, Oregon
SUBJECT: Announcement of Vacancy for Executive Secretary
Honorable Persons:
Our Executive Secretary, Celeste Vaughters, has resigned effective May 31,
1982 to take a higher paying position with the Chiles Foundation. Since we
are already overloaded at the clerical level, I wanted to refill this impor-
tant position without delay.
A former Administrative Secretary of mine heard of the opening and applied.
Since we opened the position internally just six months ago, there have
been no signficiant changes in the skills of current staff, and since the
Executive Secretary position is exempt from our union contracts, I recommend
waiver of Section 2.2 of the Personnel Rules on job announcement by motion
of Council. With the Council's waiver, I will hire Mrs. Dori Rickert as of
June 1, 1982.
Y rs uly,
Robe t W. Jean
City dministrator
cv
4._
12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171
M E M O R A N D U M
TO Tigard City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: May 20, 1982
RE Recommended Conditions of Occupancy for GTE
In response to your request at the regular city council
meeting of May 10, 1982, I have prepared the following conditions
of occupancy for the GTE addition located at 8840 S. W. Burnham
Road.
CONDITIONS
1. Greenway Dedication
GTE' s occupancy permit for a new structure/addition
located at 8840 S. W. Burnham Road (Washington County Tax Map
2S2 2DB, Lot 100) , is expressly conditioned upon:
a. The dedication of all land on Lot 100 that lies in
the 100-year flood plain/Greenway to the City
of Tigard, and
b. That such dedication be filed in the public
records of Washington County in the City of
Tigard within one year from the effective date
of the occupancy permit mentioned above.
2. Enforcement
Should GTE fail to meet any of the conditions set forth
in l.a. or l.b. above, the city shall:
a. Revoke the conditional occupancy permit pursuant
to Section 14 .04 . 64 of the Tigard Municipal Code,
and
b. Any other remedies available to the city to
enforce the provisions of this conditional
occupancy permit as set forth in Title 18 of
the Tigard Municipal Code.
U `
May 19 , 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Doris Hartig, City Recorder -fir
Subject: Appointment of Deputy City Recorder For Municipal Court Purposes Only
Staff would recommend approval of the attached Resolution No. 82-47 which appoints
Lowana Murray as Deputy City Recorder for Municipal Court purposes only. The Court
Clerk is training Lowana to serve as Assistant Court Clerk. One of the functions
of Court Clerk is to sign sworn complaints as the Deputy Recorder. We currently
have only Billie Rawlings appointed as a Deputy Recorder for Court purposes and
need this additional backup by Lowana.
lw
+ i
WASHINGTON COUNTY
Inter-Department Correspondence
Date May 12, 1982
To Board of Commissioners i JI
From Gordon L. MuIIh�01
County Administrator
Subject NON-CITY/CITY SUBSIDY MAY =
At the Public Officials ' Caucas 'of May 6, 1982, it was decided to
discuss with Portland State University officials their ability to
professionally examine the issue of. whether a non-city or city
subsidy exists in Washington County.
The procedure that we have established to begin examining this
issue will be to first sit down th Portland State officials and
discuss the scope and breadth of County government in Washington
County. This meeting has been set up for May 20, 1982 at 9:00 a.m.
and in attendance will be Marge Post, Don Mason, Bruce Thomson,
and myself. This meeting will review County programs, the cost of
those programs, and how the programs are financed. In addition,
the Portland State researchers will have the opportunity to question
us about the services the County renders .
The next step in this procedure will be to discuss this issue with
the City Managers of Washington County. Bob Jean is arranging a
meeting for early June. The purpose of this meeting will be to
examine County services, the cost of those services and which County
services should be the subject of extensive research.
Both of these meetings will be very important in determining any
financial costs of a study on this issue. It will also begin to
identify the method and scope of such a project. Once the method and
scope has been identified, then the County and other officials can
determine how they wish to proceed in this matter.
This information is intended to keep you current about the proceedings
in this matter.
GLM:sb
cc: Bob Jean
Marge Post
Don Mason
Bruce Thomson
Ma 14 , 1982
'^ Y
� r
JU
�Atn A� U1
BEAVERTON LJ
William J. Tierney MAY 1 7 1982
3701 S. George Mason Drive, #1618N
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
Dear Bill :
As a follow-up to our telephone conversation of May 12, 1982 ,
this letter sets forth the details of the offer tentatively
accepted by you for the position of Telecommunications
Administrator for the Metropolitan Area Communications
Commission (the Commission) .
The specifics of the offer are:
1. ) Starting salary: $30 ,000 per year
2. ) Starting date of employment: July 1 , 1982
3. ) Performance evaluation: The Commission will establish
criteria for evaluation of your performance which shall
be conducted within six months of employment and at least
annually thereafter .
4 . ) Additional benefits:
A. health and medical/dental insurance plans - based on
an average of the member jurisdictions of the
Commission (e.g. , League of Oregon Cities or similar
group plans - However , it will not be the plans of
any particular jurisdiction which is a member
City of Beaverton 0 4950 S.W. Hall Boulevard e Beaverton, Oregon 97005 0 (503) 644-2191
of the Commission) .
B. Retirement plan: to be established within six month
period of initial employment (e.g . , Oregon Public
Employes Retirement System) .
C. Vacation: ten working days per year , to accrue at
the rate of 6. 67 hours per month.
D. Holidays: since office will initially be located at
the City Hall of Beaverton, Oregon, holidays will be
the same as those observed by the City (currently,
ten per year) . This would be subject to change if
there is a change in office location to another
member jurisdiction.
E. Sick leave : twelve working days per year , to accrue
on the basis of one day (eight hours) per month.
F. Term life insurance : in the amount of $10 , 000 .
G. Long term disability insurance : to be provided based
on an average of the plans of the member juris-
dictions (the same as for health and medical/dental
insurance) .
H. Moving expenses: the Commission will pay actual
. costs up to a maximum of $5 , 000.
If you agree with the particulars of the offer , would you sign
and date this letter and return it to me (There is a copy enclosed
for your records) ? If you need clarification or have other
questions, please write or call me at your convenience. If you
are unable to reach me for some reason, feel free to contact Mike
Dowsett, City Attorney for the City and legal counsel for the
Commission.
The members of the Commission and I are looking forward to your
arrival and taking control of the administrative reins of the
Commission. The future appears to be very exciting in that the
communities are on the verge of constructing a sophisticated
cable communications system that is intended to be inter-
connnected with all other systems throughout the Portland
metropolitan area .
On behalf of the entire Commission, I would like to congratulate
you for being selected as M.A.C.C. ' s first Telecommunications
Administrator and welcome your arrival in the near future to the
area.
Sincerely,
Jack Nelson,
M.A.C.C. Commission Chairman
4950 S.W. Hall Blvd .
Beaverton, Oregon 97005
Telephone (503) 644-2191
TO: Jack Nelson, M.A.C.C. Commission Chairman.
I have examined the contents of the above letter setting forth
the particulars of the offer to me of the position of
Telecommunications Administrator for the Commission. By my
signature below, I hereby formally accept the offer in the
particulars set forth herein, the starting date of employment to
be July 1, 1982.
Dated and signed this day of 1982.
WILLIAM J. TIERNEY
Y
CITY OF BEAVEATON
WS RELEASE
4950 S.W.HALL BLVD. a BEAVER'rUti.OR a 97005 a (503)644-2191 NE
RELEASE DATE: 5/14/82
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J i rn Rauh, ext. ?04
Following a three-month search and intervie�., process, a 31 -year-old
community management executive and cable television consul Cant hats beer;
selected as administrator of the Metropolitan Area Conu;n:nication, Cot:,:nis,, ion.
William Tierney of Falls Church, Virginia , will begin url July 1 , i982.
Tierney's selection comes as a result of a flay ? meeting of tine Conuiis:. ion,
at which MACC Chairman Jack Nelson was authorized to commence negotiations
the two finalists for the position. William Monahan, city planner in Brockton ,
Massachusetts reluctantly declined the position due to developmPnts relating
to city government and cable television in Brockton.
Tierney' s duties as Tel ecoinmunications Administrator for MACC, an ayer:cy
composed of 12 Washington County jurisdictions , will include implementation and
enforcement of Commission policy, enforcement of franchises and other duties
related to cable television systems.
Nelson cited Tierney' s expertise in community management with the International
City Managemt.:nt Association and Tierney' s current work as consultant to the
United Cable Television Management Corporation and National Federaticn of Local
Cable Programmers in Washington, D.C. as evidence of his capabilities. Tierney' s
salary as MACC Telecommunications Administrator will be 530,000 a year.
Tierney has a B.A. in economics from Fairfield University, Fairfield ,
Connecticut and an M.A. in public administration, from the University of
Connecticut.
--r
ff
21
Unified Sewerage ,Agency of Washington County
150 N. First Avenue
Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
503 648-8621
RECEIVED
Apri 1 28, 1982 MAY 3 1982
CITY OF TIGARD
CITY OF TIGARD
12420 SW Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
At their budget worksession on April 22, 1982, the Unified Sewerage
Agency Advisory Commission unofficially approved a Fiscal 1982-83
budget that provides for a three percent increase in the Agency's
operating budget. The Commission also recommended two rate adjust-
ments to include a sewer service charge increase of $0. 75 per unit
per month and a $50 per equivalent unit increase in connection fees.
These adjustments are less than those provided in our long term
financial plan but will help in moving us toward that plan's objectives.
You should plan for these rate adjustments in your budget process.
The Budget Committee has set the Budget Hearing for May 20, 1982 at
3 p.m. at the Rock Creek Facility.
cerely,
kl
Wi -y44 f,
Gary F. Krahmer
General Manager
GFK/bjc
MAY 31982
CITY OF FiCARD
MEMORANDUM
May 19, 1982
TO: All Personnel
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Reporting Street Lights Out Procedure
RE: Patrol and Services Division
Effective this date Patrol Division personnel are directed to report
all observed street light outages to Services Division.
Services Division will complete a Request for Action form and direct
it to Public Works Director, Frank Currie.
The information required should identify the exact location of the
pole. Use the pole number, quadrant of the intersection (southwest
corner, etc. of intersection), or a street address. Exact location
is critical so that P.G.E. can make the required repairs.
W.B. ms
Chief of Police
RBA:ac
cc: City Administrator
Public Works Director
r Y.
0
May 19, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Bob Jean, City Administrator
Subject: Ordinance Correcting Typographical Error - Agenda Item # 4.
The attached ordinance is a housekeeping item. Ordinance No. 82-20 was
adopted regarding the Main Street Development Project on April 26th.
Staff has found a typographical error in Section 2 of that ordinance and
would recommend correcting the error by adopting an ordinance to that effect.
lw
4t7 5-q
May 19, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and Council
From: Bob Jean, City Administrator
Subject: Zone Change Hearings
As you are aware , staff will be renotifying citizens of the new hearing date
for the zone change issues on this agenda. In Council's motion, staff
would recommend the following be stated: Move to continue the Public
Hearing to June 14 , 1982 at 8:00 P.M. and instruct staff to readvertise and
renotify the citizenry.
May 19, 1982
PLEASE BRING THE TRANSCRIPT AND STAFF REPORT WHICH WERE DISTRIBUTED IN THE
COUNCIL PACKETS OF 5-.17-82 FOR THE MEADOWS APPEAL.
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIGARD, OREGON
`JOTICE OF APPEAL File No. CPR-13-81 MI-82
.1 • Name : Bruce Kamhoot & Associates, Inc. .
2. Address : 20 Greenrid e Court P. O. Box 222
r
Street P.O. Box
Lake Oswe o Oregon 97034
C> ty State Zip Co e
3. Telephone No. : 635-4550
4. If serving as a representative* of other persons, list their names
and addresses :
5. What is the decision you want the City Council to review?
(Examples : denial of zone change; approval of variance. )
Approval of Sensitive Lands Permit and confirm zoning for Manufactured Home
Subdivision.
6. The decision being appealed was announced by the Planning Commission
on A ril 6 1982
Da to
7. On what grounds do you claim status as a party? (See Section 18. 92 .020
Tigard Municipal Code. )
On the report drawn up by Mr. James Nim's, Engineer and recommended approval
by the Planning Staff & U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Please see letter attached.
8. Grounds for reversal of decision. (Use additional sheets if
necessary. ) Your response should deal with the following:
(a) Exp z1_n how your interest is damaged.
(b) Identify any incorrect facts mistakenly relied on in the
decision or recommendation from which you appeal .
(c) Identify any part of the zoning code or other law which you
claim has been violated by the decision or recommendation
from which you appeal .
(d) Describe what decision you are asking the City Council to make.
tea) We cannot continue with construction of a Manufacturing Home Subdivision The
_deedsofof the voting rnunlps and the rAtired` P1�r y that: do not have the income to
purchase more expensive homes will be cancelled.
Page 1 of 2
c) :sir. James Nim's report - See exhibit page
(d) We ask the City to reverse The Planning decision
9. Estimate the amount of time you will need to present your argument to
the City Council. (The Council will schedule more than 15 minutes
per side only in extraordinary circumstances. Each side will be
given the same length of time for its presenta ion. ) 5 minutes.
Signed: onsul
tant
Date : April 15 1982
rIrr r TritTTrr r `r 71r�r err rir `r
FOR USE BY CITY
Date and time of filing:
Date of Planning Commission decision:
Date set for Council consideration:
Time allowed for arguments : per side
Entered by:_
a .
Amount id 2 5-d
pReceipt
Page 2 of 2
Notii4e of Appeal
BRUCE KAPv1HOOT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BOX 222 LAKE 05vYGG0, OREGON ZIP CODE 97034 AREA CODE 803 - 635-4530
On September 8, 1981, THE PLANNING COMMISSION approved a CO�II'REHENSIVE PI,"N
REVISION and PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW of the site for MANUFACTURED HOUSING. -
We applied for a GENERAL PLAN REVIEW on January 30, 1982, and THE PLANNING
STAFF requested an application for a SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT to allow filing
within the 100-year floodplan. Bruce Kamhoot & Associates, Inc. hired Mr.
James F. Nims (a registered engineer) to study the problem and offer a solu-
tion. This solution is indicated by attached documents. The recommendation
made by Mr. Nims was approved and recowmended by the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
and concurred in by the U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. At the April 6th meet-
ing, the complaints of the neighbors regarding the presence of a Manufactured
Home Subdivision seemed to be the predominent area of discussion rather than
regarding the sensitive land use.
WE PROPOSE TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD that
a decision regarding a Manufactured Housing Subdivision in the area has been
addressed at previous meetings and approved and that the PLANNING COUNCIL
during the April 6th meeting did not address the issue, at hand, and as a
consequence they made a decision, that was total reverse of their previous
decision.
The proponents of this proposal contend that there is a need in the City of
Tigard for moderate priced housing that can only be provided by Manufactured
Housing and still meet the requirements of the building department providing
safe affordable shelter for the first time home buyer, in accordance with the
general guide line of L.C.D.C.
This land is in the ownership of the UNIFIED SEWER DISTRICT and with the advent
of the Durham plant it became of no further use to the district. Since this
property was previously zoned LIGHT INDUSTRIAL by Washington County, and with
the current acquiesce of the U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, it could have
been used for industrial purposes. THE UNIFIED SEWER DISTRICT and the CITY
OF TIGARD PLANNING STAFF believe that a MANUFACTURED HOUSING SUBDIVISION is
i a better neighborhood use than INDUSTRIAL, and we wish to submit, that had
z
CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
BRUCE= KAfv1HOOT Sc ASSOCIATES, INC.
BOX 222 i—AKE OSWEGO, OREGON ZIP COOE 07034 AREA CODE 303 — 035-4650
this property been developed Industrially, this action would have tended
to devaluate the housing in the immediate vacinity. A MANUFACTURED HOUS-
ING SUBDIVISION where the houses are set at ground level and are accom-
panied by garages or carports will tend not to devaluate the neighborhood,
in fact, will tend to make a better community by removing the remains of
the FORMER SEWER PLANT. We hereby request the council to evaluate and give
careful consideration to the proposal.
CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
i
s
100 YEA1,' I-1.00D PLAIN
This project is located within the City of
and a portion of the improvements .11-0 within the 100 yctir flc��).i
plain, of Fanno Creek . The projrrt is south of S .1%,. 5ihoIIS
Ferry Road , and North of S .W. North Dakota. Reference will be matte
to the Study made by Ch2M Hill of 1981 for the City of Ti,,zii-d , for
informational purposes . The first reference is made to Page 4-6,
showing the width of the Flood plain varies fuom 250 feet to 900
feet, as shown in the attachments .
. Specifically this site is the abandoned Metzger Sewage Treatment
facility. A housing project just downstream or south of thy - proposal
encroached into the floodplain area approximately six times the area
factor, as show4on sheet Washington County Flood Plain ;`lap, Zone "13'
as the encroachment that is proposed . .
Some of the areas- that will be addressed are as outlined on
page 3-11 , Guidelines , as follows .
1 . The owner accepts any and all liability for removal of earth
as a part of the construction together with the placement:
of riprap in new embankment areas .
2. The Natural drainage area is not. to be substantially altered
however, by the excavation of some earth the flow should be
improved, as it will be removed to make a less restri-etive
channel: . See the attached drawing showing the distances as
marked .
3 . A velocity of 6 f . p.S . should be antisipated if the current
constrictions are removed . l:iprap is designed for this flog,;
velocity, which requires a 5" size stone . See sheet 5-1
Reference is nizido to Figure 5 . 3 to shot. they m:i-Xi.murn flot,' at
North Dakota of 2700 C. F. S . , (:urrently and an ultimnte flow of
3450 C. F. S .
Therefore , %•.ihere new embankments are to be construg•tod within
the flood plain , bank protection will be constructed as shown on
Figure 6-1 .
My conclusion is after reading the study that boc•ause the mn jor
constrictions are located in relative small oponnings both upstroam
and downstream, and if major floods occur that water will flew over
the tops of both reads , that the filling of s*stall area such as we
discussing will have little or no effect to either- velocity or
storage of water, as long as the embankment area quantity is not
exceeded by the amount of excavation taken from the flood plain
under Elevation 160.
I might acid the removal of constrictions are recommended
on Page 6-3, and are described as "creating Flooding Problems"
&me . Nims .E.
RI'I
,S' '�..,,/'': - -�C'i =�^�•-�`/." .'�.c`` :�":+�-=1,`-�,:s"`+S+-y+.,-•,jt-;1=y/`^�.-i`... ,��. .t.,,z '< F._ _�:'r�:i��i a '.. ]
_i.- __. :,f• - r'. 1-�A - :> > �!�I t^- L :i f�w-�,y � \ t f � - _ ��S r-7
-;,C..i.t.~t,.<�.: fiti S, p�t'..`"'t�t�"o ..., �_ :c c I ''w�..,/� '�••,vr zf• �( ice- -'3 r j� •<�.
�`=^-;tea lc (. t} r �.'>.: ,':' y� JAZ ` t� 4aZ',-- i ,. J t t� .� i. ° J4
f _ �y < iS
.~'K`i'pyij �--'t 1 �:�'-`v�; ri..� �F'. c' - i>_� .-:r+-.' �,�,- `"S�,x�-. .1] sti''- 1• • z ' { ti.i y {
'_SFf� 1 p } ` • _~•1-! �>i`\':r 1 t'JJ T }r� Y �r kf/ r / < j z '.� 4 T j
. v �� f T% -tom• e,.�,r' air '\ •1->•-�_ } .'-1 �, ti• �,ii=-- r '- ! j/f a __ i ""
T. :•- t t.
')-I ='_ ^ � r.. �'`+.,`'.'=t <. nt^KiL(.-.-'. ��'j'� i.` f2i t„ `'Y1•. .,� y >'..1� `+ `_.v. ,, ,e .j
a 7. - i < r'.r:: - �.y�Lr .r� <. 'c.l a 7 2 '�"!F( '. i�{ A. t t` N
- �'� `� tm�yr.- wra s .S G i.+ s:.r �f_�_S'. Z. j J! ✓� /✓t b i �,-y S l'f
r »r• , 1 -� Wil: �I '. r . a � .t
P G F. 1 R` 4�u r w�- ` :l �+:..r; #�4 i r f a °�S+ 1 <t K tJz .F r r>',.7
-i 3r" C•a✓. -
?..t r( .t-F--%r-`'t'•j�i�..f�= y �...3''T it-"" -�•. �-. ''t / -F`a r _ H+'Gari'�i -:i Ql�
C'Z _, f ;r :;.::_' -'. + i - r'•:irte,.. _ �.1-..)- - - =Jr--' r�; .. .,;� �•1 -� j (t
!+,>'�',J Yam+[ !� '•a+%� - `^a 'c' T'+.+.. w•' *•Cr l S-,-• '�9aF` \.-.i I�,�+.*� fy ti,-.-c�-�', ti. a- .
I a >.-�
.j�A���1_ .fM..�tir iJY r ?�'r.'.a�...aw -r - ask T',. Vy-,J. J >-rY t.�J//� - i:,�y ��f Ti ]tT a`'� r_
+•N'j�i,-"+.l -^G -_.may ^.i1_-ur.`+'axl^ .Ij..r n.r ,,2.•s y `. T - r z a,{', �•�. �t
a:{ <yS 'x 3;ti%tt.�fl s,>'iJ-,'fit.�ti•r >•_.�-ti.a. 1*v ::. /�1�:•• 's` •:1, .y..:f.•:.�-s-'_ �L J/ +�•,.. :+- �P�. ;.�
t L r l ti _,aX�^..'--.-r+t� h%�%,A�.y.-r��ir!!;;f�-;�-.." -o i �-_:.t�ti, d -!rte i. f,-_ �,. �. ii� ", �~ " . _
•ti.` i Wit...` -'S<`a.-.�c;^,,':t�.'• �.'•J. ^,t'� n, �_ - s=-''lt..^' 1 i.-.?• �``�t•~f .1 .]
t '� ,, 1�2:.�+_�L:.�9`�+.:?a'V-J'}�••e- { =- = . =_,. J..J. r '�':f '_ �• `•a.-- r `•1'. r i.;:^C w�
• c f i a- `• Gt •i"� C�. 'c r a c'J. �•fi- +' 3tY• '•>;G 'G•' � .,TR,- r"» �-�•,`3��••..w�.Z_yr.. 1~; - r t ti_ a s
_J ..S�-� `� y %�` \.: _ �7' -'t' •-•�4'•}. ai"�:}'1 Ja4a .F cY~. meati 5tiv+:'�1 _ .+� t,\ .I '�� 'C y'?.��;•..f \
r�a _; i. ,C =a:� `i .V, -K1� >rs.<„ •"Gbz• t''1 �••l!• 4 Z r ..J 1. +*� a i..� 1.,
1F ,cv;. L ",r �y� art . 3 tetY] wt_ h Sb�'� 3 `T .ct S 'rte k si ( r l Vit° r
__•`»f-� _.: .>. .r� -z '+x L;; -:sY�.,p''`�"t--:srl, �.�'Y y .., -.t � a f Z\ -.--+ �' '� =y
�, -�t'L:•�a't,•-rf-s+t t 3.' �i � P,
. Y s.�.._ r „ � a rJ _ j�G - » 1,,, a �` i-.
3„i; .. i:. L. "-�-q.r� P°' [•�'^a a'-! `3. "mac "{ 'r�' r 3.��. s :, '�+ -c r
j COTTONWOOD i"T01�SljJ _.L NE ./ ', 'tires.'-? - r r , ;-< � CJS a J �n `4_-- 0
00[3 _ [ A -* %- t. r - ,-- - �„` '
1.
.,t. .:.:-. i� = r$,ot4`..+e=,rC Ywi [q "�� T,�'?yt, > S/ 3 z� �. s}_ r {7`4., - - ..,t i- -:.6
ems'--t.� .`+ S-1ti�ty,,�w�',�•s+�y'r'�✓�yy:,, f.F� < '�"R •t,l.tiT-a?... .r-Ct' ti ;._.•ch'^ i.F"tr 7-a�`za"z 4]•.y <.�'J".y �,.Vis •t •�+^, �__'y<
�'>"C�+' `'�"" .•r a.�-:-.'�.`,.,_,,.,.;.._o -r... 'i;."T'ti'� s 1�-%.^� =`-'•�`^�=c Z_' i r-S~.�{.: _t' y ~'�-.._ f Za< ,' = tl
_ �+q � 1.
!a ,� tyr, a'v"P a '1` 4_'. _ Y r `e _ .E r..`�. �y y/' y-� ti.'l 1�
iT_.-t i r - tr :'C i .i:'.r4+_ .•cr,,�- - - _'ti-r G •; „r _i e. - r V j� "' ...t,
_.. �' F: .adte., tr sr air. . L _ 7Z.",,•, Y <- �, r ,? r�- a i E(i r ,r
_ Y S-1 +-. v.�i �`` <G . 2 :ter rs�`.+' •, _ - �.£S! y -•
rys-'G�Y y`� e^ rs.•s_• •� --=1� - i:"it . '�-� Y �..�k .r '-�. c ` zir^-c'_ :.s�.f r '� - .. �: - /Y
.0 ' } Z '-}'..`qtr r ry'�.. --.✓ c- t >.r^_• ra s�3; s c-r�.i 5-! .::,+" �•c- �- t(1`
r
•_ .✓• �+rti` �f .-•s:,'4'�', �1:j� L c t .• _, q,2"-,+.. k. _ 1 •s3 "� '-'\Y1,:. ...•3. ;f^�xvr 5' �i "i - IS? '. �ry t
_ -: { y r , Z
•d ) •���i... ,...I'-''...,.f'wt G�w SYr '•r g" rb .. -..q,Lic- a .�'r r"r 4`, Y.').3+'Q'+-} r• -•• - _. 1•� �1
'+� Er,=::-1 {�.:b ars r�.a a -_ ,per .a4,,. ` Tye ty-,` Z 3' "� T r r - � -t 1
�..sl _... xi 0i,*T_i w�,�Y�+!y`,r1��,.++•^, 'z4 1 r',s Y7Y 7I\O I♦N'LY.Y♦�i."y_i„' Z.
,�lr�y.,�.aX w ��'....:. � j =:`7� Awr�i:T-+sC- .} 1
c f. klv"•'c-�.'-:;z..�,�.:"Z��'.l-3' C�'!<w+.. 6•�-►t f'r'c�G�J;',F .'Esti-w,4 .r` ,g,�'C. '\ -L ��. ;az_ r a.,1rCa'''P 'c: vl_-,—-r_N-% ..'»tK , `.•a_. J
r > I .1�"r.`f x I,, ; t, 7 t,,I -L.-•�J�. .uj ki a r-__-,_ St _t i_ -�_ -'• S•J
a --•t,?Y �. t of. _-`V M W.ji :�.'Sys._t•. i"Ts. <* = 3• r,le�y-• YA:� --s y a. r - ~ '.'!- ,�t
' t_+"'t 1 ,c 3 sa�Yyy r :a�' a t ' i i i �T 5-'ra _�_�>{U� } a a !.:_F __t 1 t } +
`_ ;t, 3�'` �i - .t?.'4 ..t�- a +t �'+`�•i•'� y,li ! mss-y.' - ''\ v
l 1�, i" to ;, l -.ac r-a:- 'C7+dam is < — Ts..,� }~
: :±i �r 'a q'}'wr:.yy .�= ..5.-1 i, •>_,,,+.i+ 1-' .I -, ty3&; 't''�->.4 k.a_i"} -�r� *' d. v.P- *• �i
t a''>•+�- - , t E:. �� h4r,3tG`"`-'"S�•��LY. .;�•:La'� 4r t g 1•>t"i1. �-G� a7r.Yl.:s.�.c-� -• r I.
!-..`
s -a,E ''Zs rS�+. } --tom. ,,%. I a �' r � - a .k ."'•- i-�.r"t!••z i ..,r at-4f t_ F�-` •.:,'� '7t t�yy;•�� r.c.. r j f
% . �. ;,,.✓.<�k yam, iGv J „/.A -:ale?•. ri '< •ti 4 3- Ku S.`.��"ii •l�:i?'iJ�j,�/ax`f72- T's..�F'�_[�' l�tye 1-a
� {vt _ .t a. S� ti.t^. _ w �,r .•G�hr / F,- .r . !! -.� �,• �•'i
f 1/ \ .Y Fa ',s<2'.t t �; 4" i -t r �a ::'� tc,
L .1. ks. r--••a ,tu ,>\ +}...!. tM^t +-. c or •LS _ a-+\; -4 ,`'i K.. '� _ ;� r r r t
i r'••r. �?,"�_ a >.,,'2 .;4 a F- ., + ��_tt•• "7 `� 3 +> �'�_ ,.T� �- a.+•.. ~ > r �� - ,, a
ate. 1 Y' �` �a"Ei.!'-�3' 'a*.,z`� a. s a- �-v"p 7t�a"��'aZ n w �a� _ -� �..a• _ `- .�•'`'4-`-- - y
7�•; y,^y.,,s +.� ° -rte Y._ t JK'�' '. 1 ro-J + \ �a _..a ! T-•v-L:a .'
Y ^i
.s ry�, I _f `S 'i Y-q ZS ay 'C . j i V .._ r t �T 'l'---+.s' ,✓ \��._.- -
�` T�'�>-„•r a �.?h_y ` t f ar - r-3 `F� a t: ~z'-; a z
a. '+T ,G4 ,,^,5�:'! .,, �y, �'Lll_ _S'•a s i ; 3. w. ! T 1% t"va 3 '✓`!r^ -c„ _ t
- r - 1,. �'} - t '✓l. a r -S +.. r .-- -,.0 4. ?. y, -ar . a D a<l-
' - a �{ I LIZ Yom' t 1,- }. Y 'S°'? L !1\
d
$ G w-
-'! 11,
SST'-'�.>' 1.
its' r,F. �;�- < �►f.::•..r r, .. . ! 't. .,4 f+ -eT'-a . r __ `.. . ti t '�j. .
:11
at_�r. -w, 5 '-+� t',+- - .�. - « 's"`-� y ti j {:-:_ � ���G�/-1 J4 't i ..rte'-.. -�
- E .�: a•7t .b;.;3L ,,'1 r�-S.Ss' '}�aS ��,.- _N�T.r_.s,. ;<,- t ;P., .�'"�k ;(',,.��`}, r'-`,srt.p�j ter_:�!+�a.-.ra _-'_t
Gam+-a^ .1, shit. ,[y,,,.�. zti:.�, f�!-t •.ar.-£-v Y.-_*-.--- ¢`'-,�^'z-�.- {I,- 'I '-.r'_ 1''::=r..r.-�
i `� I�-y��_j,,•�� Y4.V �s - h'�>a.Y-ti/'r w c J r-4•l J �tiC /�+ i j jti 1.�jr` �_ ft r• j
�.t, 'j..i / /"sr� } tK 'F y^:;=' ••J a •F:r�.-»t� y ��e,t.--1"'ar\ t-J 7 !'•a� 'j',. �G eGj G a' t l - _a y t
1.
.=-7r°-- , - {[[ 'G._-a n r !.,-":s-'t? -?t '' �k:I.tt s�-yj .f �i�° i.r_`: ;t`-ty;�flx.�rs,- Si
•. d"'. .:.:. �� i'�--- r_ .0 4- :_ [ 1r�?r a 4•� *".rR, az..„ a r' moi:;•!` i3^ . 'ti r� .;'�-'?I
ir~� v�'�(r.�$.��[ • -:} t ,tic. .~ -�+ r ,T K'F"'=Yt.;• r 'Y .'F -�•_ -j `•Gi 2 ,{r �t-�
4 i- t a L"-' .-} , t f ' r ,,. L .-T 2 - . ,, r ,1 J .•' l?•� .� _s '� C �r
.� «,C._I-_' { it t` rr >. />// k�� % 'k r ✓ {•_..,<< _r) `
>j sj '�F; = ♦'`/-i `3 ti :=,•JG"`Gi.. ,�rwr. Imo. 1/G.. �fJ '� t ♦ -�. c�-f k r `� - %�w•'1 tom. - !
I "� �S/ f l�' -" ... -- < , �.r . --- -;
o - •.1= "., + .�«_ 3 r?a� 1 GJ: .G fi-;: 5 Tr•,i !r i
ii
•t r- ,.t, ST- .�.�tt>vaazi.�f` `r, .'�`J.a^. 1\":[:-j S1. _+••_ .. .::. Q- =- -.Y.•i i �S'�,!•'�• -,P-- ,- �� Jz�(�i-f!r,-
9
inundated with floodwaters up to 1 .8 feet deep . The Tigard
St. bridge is estimated to be under 3 . 3 feat of water durino,
the 100-year flood. The flood elevation over the North Dakota
St. bridge is projected to be 2 .2 feet higher than the road
surface. Both the Tigard St. and North Dakota St- bridges
would have a high probability of losing their spans if a fl,-,o_:1 r
of this magnitude did occur. "
North Dakota - St. to Scholls Ferry Rd. The flooding problems r
along this reach of Fanno Creek are relatively minor because
development has been restricted in the flood plain. A few
residential structures on Ironwood Loop may experience minor C
damage during the 100-year flood. The flood-plain width along
this reach of the stream varies from 250 to 950 feet. The
flood elevation at the upstream face of the existing Scholls
Ferry Rd. bridge is projected to be 0 .7 foot lower than the
road surface over the bridge. However, floodwaters will be E
approximately 0 .3 foot deep over a low spot on Scholls Ferry
Rd. located about 125 feet northeast of the east bridge
abutment. The Scholls Ferry Rd. bridge is scheduled to be
replaced in the near future by the Oregon Highway Department.
The flood-related effects of the new structure will be
discussed in Chapter 5 of this report.
Scholls Ferry Rd. to 200 Feet Downstream of Hall Blvd.
(Beaverton) . The flooding problems along this reach of Fanno s
Creek are relatively minor. The flood-plain width varies
from 400 to ' 1, 900 feet. A few houses along both Settler Way
and Parkview Loop may experience minor damage during the
100-year flood. A potential off-line storage reservoir site
exists on the east overbank of Fanno Creek approximately 0 .8
mile upstream of the Scholls Ferry Rd. bridge.
4. 1 . 1.2 Ash Creek
Ash Creek is a major tributary of Fanno Creek, and it enters
Fanno from the east approximately 400 Feet upstream of North
Dakota St. Ash Creek drains a 4.1-square-mile area that is
predominantly residential in land use. As part of the
Washington County FIS, the COE computed flood elevations along
a 1 .5-mile reach of Ash Creek from its mouth to Hemlock Street. ;
Flood-plain maps were also drawn by the COE for the 100-year
flood along Ash Creek. The maps show that some flood damage
would occur along Ash Creek: if the 100-year flood occurred.
The following is a detailed description of the 100-year
flooding problems along Ash Creek.
f
Mouth to Highway 217 . The flood-plain width along this reach
of Ash Creek varies from 100 to 900 feet with the greater
widths occurring downstream or to.
Rd. An industrial
building located on the southeast overbank of the creek
between the Southern Pacific Railroad and Greenbur,: Rd. may
suffer some minor damage. One residential structure appears
to be within the 100-year flood plain. It is located on the
274D 4-6
6 . 1 .4 Storage Effect
Using the future 100-year flood hydrograph just upstream of
Scholls Ferry Rd. obtained from the Fanno Creek model, the
storage provided in the detention facility described above
could conceivably lower the future 100-year flood peak from
2,580 to 2, 000 cfs. This represents a 29 percent reduction
in the peak at the storage facility. The Fanno Creek hydro-
logical model was then used to estimate the future 100-year
peaks farther downstream of the potential storage facility.
These lower peak flows were then added into the Fanno Creek
hydraulic model to estimate the reduction in floodwater
elevations throughout Tigard that would result from the
potential storage facility.
Figure 6.1 shows the future 100-year flood elevations along
Fanno Creek, both with and without the storage facility.
All the bridges in Figure 6.1 are existing structures except
the Scholls Ferry Rd. bridge, which is the proposed state !
highway structure discussed in Chapter 5. r
Figure 6.1 shows that the flood stage reduction is approxi-
mately 2 feet just below the proposed facility (not shown
but located between Sections 7 .81 and 8 .03 ) . However, the
flood stage reduction decreases to approximately 1.5 feet i
just below Scholls Ferry Rd. and to approximately 0. 5 foot
below Tigard St. and throughout most of downtown Tigard:
Although the flood peak reduction was 29 percent at the
facility, its effect decreases substantially once Ash and
Summer Creeks enter Fanno Creek. In fact, the potential
storage facility will provide only a 5.4 percent reduction
in the peak flow at Main St.
The potential storage facility does not appear to be an
effective flood control alternative by itself. However, it
may provide more benefit in conjunction with the selective
removal and reconstruction of bridges and other hydraulic
constrictions farther downstream.
6 .2 CONSTRICTION REMOVAL
Figure 6. 1 shows that several road crossings on Fanno Creek
are creating flooding problems because they constrict the
amouit of flow area available to the floodwaters _ These
structures include: Bonita Rd. , Hall Blvd. , .lain St. , Grant
Ave. , Tiedeman Ave. , Tigard St. , and Ndrth Dakota St. In
addition to the constrictions created by these structures,
channel constrictions occur in the vicinity of the Main St.
bridge and the Grant Ave. bridge. Also, the streambed profile
shown on Figure 6.1 indicates that considerable scour and
deposition have occurred in the immediate vicinity of these
two structures .
464CC 6-3
6 . 1 .4 Storage Effect
Using the future 100-year flood hydrograph just upstream or
Scholls Ferry Rd. obtained from the Fanno Creek model, the
storage provided in the detention facility described above
could conceivably lower the future 100-year flood peak from
2, 580 to 2, 000 cfs . This represents a 29 percent reduction
in the peak at the storage facility. The Fanno Creek hydro-
logical model was then used to estimate the future 100-year
peaks farther downstream of the potential storage facility.
These lower peak flows were then added into the Fanno Creek
hydraulic model to estimate the reduction in floodwater
elevations throughout Tigard that would result from the
potential storage facility.
Figure 6.1 shows -the future 100-year flood elevations along
Fanno Creek, both with and without the storage facility.
All the bridges in Figure 6. 1 are existing structures except
the Scholls Ferry Rd. bridge, which is the proposed state
highway structure discussed in Chapter 5 .
Figure 6.1 shows that the flood stage reduction is approxi-
mately 2 feet just below the proposed facility (not shown
but' located between Sections 7 .81 and 8 .03 ) . However, the
flood stage reduction decreases to approximately 1 . 5 feet
just below Scholls Ferry Rd-. and to approximately 0 .5 foot
below Tigard St. and throughout most of downtown Tigard.
Although the flood peak reduction was 29 percent at the
facility, its effect decreases substantially once Ash and
Summer Creeks enter Fanno Creek. In fact, the potential
storage facility will provide only a 5.4 percent reduction
in the peak flow at Main St.
The potential storage facility does not appear to be an
effective flood control alternative by itself. However, it
may provide more benefit in conjunction with the selective
removal and reconstruction of bridges and other hydraulic
constrictions farther downstream.
6.2 CONSTRICTION REMOVAL
Figure 6 . 1 shows that several road crossings on Fanno Creek
are creating flooding problems because they constrict the
amount of flow area available to the floodwaters . These
structures include: Bonita Rd. , Hall Blvd_ , Main St. , Grant
Ave. , Tiedeman Ave . , Tigard St. , and North Dakota St. In
addition to the constrictions created by these structures,
channel constrictions occur in the vicinity of the Main St.
bridge and the Grant Ave. bridge. Also, the streambed profile
shown on Figure 6 .1 indicates that considerable scour and
deposition have occurred in the immediate vicinity of these
two structures .
464CC 6-3
CHANNEL BANK PROTECTION
` 6.01 .60 General
Channel bank protection is necessary when natural bank material
is unstable as discussed in Section 5. Riprap of rock, rubble masonry
with grout, sacked concrete, and broken concrete slab are most commonly
used to protect embankment or channel slopes of unstable material .
-.02.00 Rock Riprap
Rock riprap is either light loose or heavy loose riprap. Either
should be placed on a one-foot thick filter material graded from sand
to- 6 inch gravel to protect the original bank material from scour or
sloughing. The filter should be graded in layers from fine to coarse
out to' theriprap. Riprap thickness should be 2 feet thick for light
loose and 3 feet thick for heavy loose riprap. The toe of the riprap
should be placed below the channel bed a depth equal to the thickness
of the riprap.
• O -
OD= /00 qq flood deofh
or Q
o�
Tyoica/ Roc1r R,orpp
Fig. 6-1
6-2
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL
MAJOR DRAINAGE
4�
NOTE )�-I
The rlprop should be composed of 5000
wen graded mixture but most of 'iI f�T
the stones should be of the size I
Indicated by the curve Rlprop should I ! I
be placed over a filter blanket or 1 ; , , 4000
42
bedding of graded grovel in a layer
15 times (or more) as thick as theI 5500 ._
largest stone diameter , I ' I ►-
O
�— I 300o O
I
36 2500 m
I I I I U
,
5S I I t I
' 20a
W
0
W 30 I I I ; 1500
a
y I 1 I 1 Is
- z , I u•1
i
1000
_ d
cc
1 900
W I
a- 24 i 1 eoo
1 t ! C)
� I Too z
Q I I I O
600 0
C) I i 2S i
p2Fl 1 500 4
UJI
IF 3F Z
- O I i 1 400 tat
Z
N 19 I 1 I I 300
I NOTES 250 "'
Curve shows minimum size
stones necessary to 2O° CI
1 resist movement. ISO
' 3S 5F Curve Is tentative and i
12 I 04F subject to change as a 100 ,a
`A S result of futher tests 75
or operating experiences o
I i F points ore prototype 50 1'--
I rlprop installations
i which foiled. 25 W
6 I ! 1 S points ore satisfactory ?
I i06F In3toltotion5. 10
1 � r
5
0 I t I I
0 5 10 15 20 25 °
I BOT' M V'_LOCITY IN FEET PER SECOND
From USBR
FIGURE 5-1. RIPRAP SIZING (13)
12 - 15 - 68
03nvar Rvgionol Council of Govarnmanla
artificial channels will be used with discretion and then only
to accommodate existing development for minimum reaches _
Channel design criteria include:
o Channel side slopes from 2 : 1 to 1'x: 1 may be rip-
rapped, but steeper slopes must be solidly lined
with an anchored wall. Care must be taken for
freeze, thaw, ground-water, and expansive soil
effects-
0 The bottom of channels must generally be lined when
the velocity exceeds 6 fps .
® The channel should have a freeboard of 2 feet.
• -' A Use trickle channels for low flows with capacities
of about 1 percent of design flow.
Natural Channels. Natural waterways in urbanized and urbaniz-
able areas that have mild slopes, are reasonably stabilized,
and obviously are not in a state of degradation may not need
extensive modification for them to provide adequate service
as part of the drainage system. If the channel is to be used
for carrying storm runoff from the urbanized area, it can be
initially assumed that the changed runoff regime will result
in new and active erosional tendencies . In some cases, slight
modifications to the channel will be required to create a '
more stabilized -condition for the channel .
Because of the decided sociological advantages of using
natural .waterways for urban storm drainage purposes, the
designer should consult with experts in related fields about
the method of development. Usually, park and greenbelt areas
can be incorporated into the channel works . In these cases,
criteria for freeboard depth, curvature, and other design
aspects applicable to artificial channels do not apply. For
instance, there may be significant advantages 'Co designing
adjacent areas for localized flooding during major runoff
peaks. In addition, the flood plain must be defined so
I adequate land use zoning will protect the waterway from
encroachment and allow it to maintain its capacity and natural
storage potential.
Channel Erosion Control . Grass-lined channels are erodible
to some degree. Experience has shown that designing a grass-
lined channel completely protected from erosion is uneconomi-
cal and costly. It is much better to provide a reasonable
design with plans for additional erosion control measures and
corrective steps after the first year of operation. Using
erosion control cutoff walls will safeguard a channel from
serious erosion in case of a large runoff before the grass
can develop a good root system. Such cutoff walls are also
useful in containing the trickle channel .
274E 5•-17
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN��
VT
FIGURE 5.3
CITY O; TIGARD }
-►--r--
. FLOOD PROFILES
FANNO CREEK
{ —1 UPPER PROFILE STREAM QED
FUTURE 100
YEARFLUNS
1 LOWER PROFILE ( f SECTION NU,AE3cR
' - - EXISTING 100
- YEAR FLOWS
Y:HILL< i
17
CC
16
Q 16 ► � ---i i 3 � L� �
T �
-�j
t;
O 2000 - 4000 6000 8000 10000
OI-57ANCE /Al FEET
E)Vc rsl zcd DDomer,
E, 05 -2L)- 92
Afndc, l0
. ��il�i-j491i1�i(t�l(lilil'Iji#lii f(i�F(I�Fj(fij7 I(1 7j!T F'6)l�lgi t ! 1(f I11 iii 117 1 1111r)Ili ijf i(( jl i(f 11111121 1(2 lil I(Ill Jill if lil l(I iil iil lit !(I tit ftl Fil '�
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN j
THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO Amw
THE QUALITY OF TFE ORIGINAL '
DRAWING. -- - --- _.
0£ 62 8Z L2 8Z SZ bZ £Z ZZ it OZ 6P 9f Li 91 51' y� Ei ti
-..j' _ OP., 6 Q
- -... pli�uid611�ifllhui�uu(11Nn ' Almil ' ----t---_,JiH
""An"' Le 1;H
- WFJ11W
19
�. }
—_„--
5 9° 52 29; E 474,75'
160
oil -
LXIbr3.- L
:.::•::•:: � Jt b
U.
16
_3
rQE:Li .Av4(or N
S � �
0 -' ---------
- -�= -,
a
\ \`
Ld
qq LLJ,
civ iv
z 0 e
/
166
a
�r•c z. i
� r
t�� o
a -
aLE X ®e r`
50'
a 0
SANITARY
��.
ANHOLE
64.67 7
'k
37 _ -
i0i �®
-------------
\\
Oi;F�ii.ioss�rv�e®asirs �®ser0000®oeswirswe-✓off®p r' .°�",•'.'
EMSTING
BUILDING ..
\ V w
_. • yr �� 4� i'
N 8.9°50`16 E 468.19'
l L— i
o�
n
,. I 1!1H1 1111• i .1 I ii'l IT I l1 1l'II T i�lrmIn 1..11 r I ng l1a i
i I I I.I �'In�+1111 +Ir�la�11+�11++i1+1+h LIla I-11111111111'11111(IIIIaIIIIf I11Ia11'lla�a�+iall � � -
NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED �._._ 1 6 7 8 8 (j10 1) 12 f
DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN
THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - 's
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL _.
DRAWING.
__— —' ----- -- - .. - ------ –---..._
_. a. �:, cii OI 6 8 L 9 S 6 E Z I'"'+"' F
OE 6Z 8Z [Z 9Z SZ 4Z EZ ZZ IZ OZ 6f 81 L1...oi ��"
�
ntiuuinniuni+umlonlNU+41lt++f�ntl9JGud_u �Id++�Uyltill - 1••• '•'• 11W11w1iwIi18' ' _
r
MARCH'
7 ' 1990
r � ANALYSIS OF
THE
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
�-
FOR
CIN OF TlqARD
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
L ov
L by
L� LEE ENGINEERING, INC .
L MAY 1982
F
ENGINEERING
Lek INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / PLANNERS
F. Duane Lee P.E.
David A. Lee P.E.
James G. Smith P.E.
May 21, 1982
Project No. 468.1
Honorable Mayor Wilbur Bishop
and City Council
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 3397
Tigard, Oregon 97223
{ Attention: Bob Jean, City Administrator
Re: Analysis of Tigard Water District
Mayor Bishop and Council :
The analysis of the Tigard Water District , as authorized in our letter agree-
ment of May 5, 1982, has been prepared and is transmitted herewith.
The report outlines findings which resulted from the following major activities:
1. A review of all existing data submitted to us by the City of Tigard and
neighboring jurisdictions.
2. Personal discussions with a number of individuals from the neighboring
jurisdictions.
3. Development of a mathematical model of the District's water system and
analysis of that model with the aid of a computer.
4. Discussions with the staff of the City of Tigard.
5. Comparison of the operations of the Tigard Water District with the operations
of other water purveyors.
We would like to personally thank you, your staff, and all other individuals
who willingly provided information upon which this report was based. Without
their assistance, this report would not have been possible.
Respectfully,
LEE ENGINEERING, INC.
F. Duane Lee, President
Attachment
708 MAIN ST., SUITE 202, OREGON CITY, OREGON, 97045, PH 503'E55-1342
c
t
ANALYSIS OF
THE
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
for
f4_.
f
CITY OF TIGARD
Washington County, Oregon
I_.
7
7
D PR
�Nct N OF�s� PROffs�i
849
OPT
VAN17,
E �'�� l vc. 22.
!FR C m
i
i
1
LEE ENGINEERING, INC.
708 Main Street, Suite 202
Oregon City, Oregon 97045
655-1342
y
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE
CHAPTER 1 - SUMMARY
1.1 Summary of Findings.......... ........... ...... .. ............ 1
CHAPTER II - INTRODUCTION
2.1 Purpose and Authorization......... ...... . ...... ............. 3
2.2 Scope.. ............................. ..... ................... 3
2.3 Acknowledgements........... ...... ....... .... ... ............. 4
CHAPTER III - INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Background............................... ..... ...... ........ 5
3.2 Water Supply and Consumption............. ..... .............. 5
3.3 Distribution and Storage System.......... ........ ....... .... 8
3.3.1 Distribution System................ ........... ....... 8
3.3.2 Storage System...... .............. ..... .............. 9
3.3.3 Commentary........................ ............. ...... 10
3
3.4 Financial Status. .. ...................... ................... 11
CHAPTER IV - FUTURE SITUATION
4.1 Land Use and Demographic Data.......... .. ................... 18
4.2 Water Consumption Projections........................ ....... 19
4.3 Water Supply Alternatives................................... 19
4.3.-1 Introduction......*........ ................ 19
4.3.2 Clackamas River Water.............................. .. 20
4.3.3 Bull Run River Water............................ ..... 20
4.3.4 Trask - Tualatin System.............................. 24
4.3.5 Willamette River.......................... ...... ..... 25
4.3.6 Future Cost and Availability of Water Storage........ 28
TABLES:
3.1 - History of Water Purchases, Sales and Net Consumption........... 7
3.2 - Bond Sinking (Debt Service) Fund for FY 77-78 Through FY 82-83.. 12
3.3 - General Fund for FY 77-78 Through 82-83...... ................... 13
( 3.4 - Comparison of Residential Water Costs....... ................ 15
4.1 - Population Projections.......................................... 19
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D)
DESCRIPTION PAGE
TABLES (Cont'd):
4.2 - Projected Average Daily and Peak Day Water Demand......... ...... 19
4.3 - Projection of Demand and Supply for East Washington County
Water Purveyors on the Bull Run Washington County Supply System. 23
4.4 - rost Comparison of Willamette River Alternatives................ 27
4. 5 - Projections of Cost and Availability of Water Sources... ........ 30
FIGURES:
3.1 - Comparison of Residenteial Water Costs on Basis of Commodity
,,.._ Rate and Tax Rate.......................................... ..... 16
4.1 - Illustration of Proportion of Water Purchased from Portland vs.
Proportion Purchased from Outside Purveyor Over Time........ ... 21
r 4.2 - Projections of Cost Availability of Water Sources.............. 31
{
z
i
t
CHAPTER I
SUMMARY
1.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The investigation undertaken in this study effort indicates that the
present pumping, distribution and storage facilities within the Tigard
Water District are in good to very good condition. Based on a review of
current audits, the fiscal condition of the Water District also appears
to be very goods The present water supply for the District appears to
be adequate, but the District has not yet committed to a long-term supply
of water and this lack of commitment may have significant impact on the
future growth potential of the City of Tigard.
A summary of the major findings resulting from this report is as follows:
1. Supply and Distribution Pipelines
The condition of the present supply and distribution system is good
to very good. The pipelines are constructed of primarily ductile
iron and cast iron pipes which are considered to be' one of the better
construction materials for water lines. The pipes have been sized
adequately to meet present and future water distribution requirements.
Most of the pipelines are located within public rights-of-way and are
adequately valved for routine operation and maintenance.
Other construction materials such as fire hydrants, service lines,
and meters are of good to excellent quality and have been installed,
for the most part, during the past 15 to 20 years. Most of the
materials for construction can be expected to last between 20 and 200
years. Water meters will need to be tested and replaced every 20 to
ARM 40 years; service lines every 40 to 60 years; and pipelines every 100
to 200 years. In general., the materials of construction used in the
distribution system together with services are those commonly used in
the waterworks industry and there appear to be no major deficiencies
in the piping system of the Tigard Water District.
2. Storage
The c-tnrage facilities of the District consist of steel and concr e"Ce
reservoirs totalling 17.4 mg capacity at this time. An additional 2.5
mg capacity is being constructed. The reservoirs are in good to very
good condition.
An original study done in 1971 by Stevens, Thompson and Runyan, Inc.
indicated a need for 20 mg of storage by the year 2000. The District
has constructed the estimated required storage at this time, contem-
plating the future need. However, based on more recent estimations
for growth in Tigard, it appears that the 20 mg of storage will last
beyond the year 2000.
Only minor maintenance is anticipated in the reservoirs during the
next 20 years. Those maintenance efforts will include repainting of
the steel tanks, cleaning and possible coating of the interior of the
-. concrete tanks, and repair of the exposed concrete on the roof and
top of walls of some of the tanks. Each of these items are considered
to be normal , routine maintenance.
1
3. Fire Protection
The computer analysis developed for this brief investigation of the
Tigard Water District indicates that fire protection is adequate
throughout most areas within Tigard. Assuming that the District
continues to construct the piping network proposed in the 1371 study,
it appears that fire protection will be adequate throughout the Dis-
trict through the year 2000, based on present requirements of the
local fire districts and the Insurance Service Office (ISO).
4. Supply
h�strict presently obtains the majority of its water from the City
of Lake Oswego and uses additional water supplies from its wells and
the City of Portland to assist meeting peak day demands each summer.
The District does not have a committed source of water to meet its
long-range needs. A decision on long-range water supply should be made
in the very near future. Failure to commit to a long-range need will
foreclose many of the present options that may be available. Failure
to commit to a long-range supply may have serious consequences on the
future growth of the City of Tigard.
5. Water Rates
A comparison of water rates for the Tigard Water District in relation-
ship to other water rates for neighboring communities indicates that
Tigard's rates are slightly above average of those for the surrounding
communities. The primary effect on future water rates will depend
upon the future supply of water to the Tigard area. It is safe to say
that future water rates will significantly increase as a result of the
development of future water supplies.
g�g
E
} 2
CHAPTER II
INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZATION
The City of Tigard receives domestic water service from the Tigard and
Metzger Water Districts. The Tigard Water District provides approximately
80% of the City's domestic water. The Water District purchases most of
its water from Lake Oswego and also provides water from its own wells and
from the City of Portland. The District does not own any interest in the
water supply facilities of Lake Oswego or Portland. The District's primary
function is to disribute water to its customers through a system of pumping
stations, pipelines and reservoirs.
The City of Tigard is separate from the Tigard Water District. Each entity
is a municipal corporation established under Oregon law and each has its
own elected officials to oversee the operation of each jurisdiction.
Although the Water District serves areas outside the City, the City is
concerned about the operation of the Water District since a large portion
of the District includes the City of Tigard.
The City is required by Oregon State law to include in its Comprehensive
Planning process a review of the public facilities, including water and
sewer service. The primary purpose of this study is to provide the City
with an independent review of the water system to determine its ability to
serve the present City and to serve the proposed future Comprehensive
Plans for the City's growth. This study will also be used to further
investigate other City facilities such as the City's sewer system.
Obviously, there is a direct relationship between consumption of domestic
water and the generation of sewage.
A major concern of the City at this time is the apparent lack of cooperation
between the City and the Dater District regarding each entity's planning
efforts. There is also major concern regarding the future growth of Tigard
and the apparent lack of an established or committed plan for a long-term
supply of water to meet the present and future growth of Tigard. Therefore,
Lee Engineering, Inc. was authorized by the City of Tigard in a letter
dated May 5, 1982, to conduct a technical and financial analysis of the
Water District to assist the City in determining how well the Water District
serves the City.
2.2 SCOPE
The scope of the study includes the following primary elements:
1. A review of the existing Water District, including a physical inventory
of pipelines, pumping stations and reservoirs. The facilities were
mathematically modeled and analyzed with the aid of a computer. The
system was analyzed to determine the ability of the physical improve-
ments to meet water demands including fire flows.
2. A projection of the future needs of the water system with regard to
future land use, population and proposed improvements.
H
a 3
3. A review of the financial status of the District including a 'com-
parison of residential rates with those of surrounding municipalities.
4. A brief assessment of the present and future water supplies.
The scope of this study was limited to a review of the existing available
data supplied by Tigard and other jurisdictions. No intent was made to
develop new plans or to investigate in detail additional information which
was not submitted directly to us. For example, no attempt was made to
thoroughly investigate the detailed operations of the Water District; the
investigation was limited primarily to results of past operations and
information submitted to us.
Cost estimates developed during analysis of al::ernative water supplies
resulted from information taken from other reports. That information was
updated to current costs where possible. Cost estimates were analyzed to
the degree necessary to compare various alternatives. The cost estimates
were not intended nor proported to represent the true costs which may
result from development of future supplies. More detailed studies and
cost estimates are necessary before any of the plans are implemented.
2.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following individuals provided much of the data upon which this report
is based. Their assistance and willingness to cooperate was greatly
appreciated.
1. Bob Jean, Frank Curie, Liz Newton, Jeremey Coursille, and Bob
Thompson, City of Tigard.
2. Bob Santee, Administrator, Tigard Water District.
3. Dr. Martin Johnson, Chairman, Wolf Creek Highway Water District.
4. Gene Seibel , Administrator, Wolf Creek Highway Water District.
5. John -Godsey, Director of Public Works, City of Lake Oswego.
6. Carl Goebel , Manager, and Sally Stone, Portland Water Bureau.
7. Jesse Lohman, Manager, Metzger Water District.
f
8. Bruce Warner, City Engineer, City of Beaverton.
9. Steve Rhodes, Administrator, City of Tualatin.
10. Don Potter, Manager, City of Wilsonville:
4
CHAPTER III
INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 BACKGROUND
Thei�'gard Water District, organized in 1938 as a municipal corporation,
provides water to the City of Tigard, King City and a portion of unincor-
porated Washington County to the west of the two cities. Presently,
two-thirds of its service area is within the city limits of Tigard. In
addition, approximately 80% of the City of Tigard is served by the Tigard
Water District and the remaining 20% in the northeastern portion of the
City is served by the Metzger Water District.
3.2 WATER SUPPLY AND CONSUMPTION
The Tigard Water District obtains water from three sources:
1. Four deep wells owned by the District.
2. Bull Run water via purchase from the City of Portland.
3. Clackamas River water via purchase from the City of Lake Oswego.
From 1938, when the District was formed, until the mid-1960's, groundwater
was the primary source of supply. However, because the District's four
wells could not keep up with increased demand due to rapid population
growth, interties were made with the Metzger Water District in 1962 and
the Capitol Highway Water District (now part of the Portland Water Bureau)
in 1969 to provide surplus Bull Run water. However, these interties proved
unsatisfactory because the facilities of the two adjoining water districts
were not designed to accommodate Tigard's demands as well as their own
peak summer demands.
Continued high consumption of groundwater from the Bull Mountain-Cooper
Mountain basalt aquifer in which the District's wells are located led to
a decline in the water table. Finally, in May 1974, the State Engineer
declared the aquifer a "critical groundwater area" and imposed restric-
tions on pumping. As a result, Tigard's wells are restricted to 1,060
acre feet per year or 46.2 million cubic feet per year which averages
approximately .95 million gallons per day (mgd). As seen in Table 3.1,
the production from the wells has never approached that limit but instead
dropped to a low of 21 million cubic feet in 1978 due to a declining water
tables. As a result, well no. 3 can produce no more than 50 gallons per
minute (gpm). In addition, the iron content of well no. 4 has increased
to the point where the well is no longer used. Therefore; only wells no.
1 and 2 are presently used. Together they produce 1 mgd and are only
operated during the three or four-month summer period to aid in meeting
peak demand. As a result of this and the growing demand, the percent of
total water supplied by the wells has declined from 48% in 1973-74 to 14%
in 1980-81. Therefore, the District can no longer depend on groundwater
as a primary source of supply.
4 In 1973, direct connections were made to the Lake Oswego and Portland
systems which have enabled the District to meet its supply needs through
the purchase of surplus water. The City of Lake Oswego pumps Clackamas
River water from its intake located in Gladstone through its 16 mgd water
5
treatment plant in West Linn up to its 4 mg Waluga Reservoir. From there
the water flows through a dedicated 16" line to the District's 3,200 gpm
Pump station near the intersection of I-5 and Bonita Road. The pump
station is controlled from Lake Oswego's water treatment plant enabling
the City to deliver surplus water on an "as needed - as available" basis.
According to the City, the District calls the water treatment plant on a
daily or weekly basis to determine if water is available and to request a
specified amount to be purchased. This purchase arrangement was formalized
by an agreement between the City and the District dated October 17, 1972,
under which the City makes available surplus water to the District on the
condition that the City reserves the right to interrupt or curtail delivery
of that surplus water to the District. The agreement was effective for
an initial period of four years and is automatically renewed for additional
four-year periods unless terminated by the City at the end of any four-
year period by giving at least one year's notice that insufficient water
is available to meet the requirements of both the District and the City.
The agreement may be terminated by the District at any time provided 60
days' notice is given.
Since 1973, the District has relied on Lake Oswego as its primary source
Of supply. The present cost of this water is $.31/100 cubic feet. As
seen in Table 3.1, the percentage and amount of water purchased from Lake
Oswego increased steadily between 1973 and 1978. During the period 1978
through 1980, water purchases were restricted and actually reduced by Lake
Oswego because its system was reaching capacity. However, once the water
treatment plant expansion from 10 to 16 mgd was completed and the capacity
of the Waluga Reservoir was increased to 4 mg in late 1980, the restrictions
were lifted and the District purchases increased. The increase appears
much more dramatic between FY 79-80 and 80-81 because the District began
supplying all of the City of Tualatin's water in May 1980. Prior to that
date, Tualatin purchased water directly from Lake Oswego. However, due
to Lake Oswego's increasing demand, that portion of its storage and
distribution system near the Tualatin-Oswego intertie became inadequate to
serve Tualatin's needs.
The Tigard Water District purchases water from the City of Portland
primarily-from March through September to satisfy excess demand that cannot
be met by purchases from Lake Oswego or production from its wells. The
Portland Water Bureau pumps Bull Run water from its Carolina and Fulton
Pump stations through its Burlingame reservoir complex via a 24" main to
Bradley Corners (the intersection of S.E. Oleson, Hall and Greenburg) where
it passes through a 10" master meter and into the District's 16" trans-
mission line.
Water is supplied by Portland to the District under the terms of a 10-year
agreement dated April 25, 1977, for the sale of a firm supply of surplus
water. Under Article 3 of this agreement, Portland must supply an annual
amount of water "computed as the prior year's consumption or the highest
of the past three years, whichever is greater, plus an annual water con-
sumption growth factor of 5%." The purchaser, however, may petition the
City Council for approval of purchase of additional water. In addition,
according to Article 11, the "Purchaser agrees to maintain its level of
purchases ..... at not less than the present ratio of City water used to
the total water used by the Purchaser based on the lower of the past three
years' usage."
6
�A o r- LO r- OO to m rr to
...� r, -4 CT O N LC) Ln CU
U H cm • • • •
Cl C-D .4 N �--� N N N N N 7D
W � r L
w- Ln y
• iV
I
C=) 3
O CT
CD .-C Nr-
� o ro
LLJ
0
J to
I.-- O O •D •
V) W O O a..e r 4-
W O O V CT O
LL- r r�
O co _ L 1 4-.1
Lr) 00.Ui N co N r- 7 C
m 01) O
CT - Y E 4-)
U to L LL- A to
CU L
CU r to
Z b +j cn—
C>
r-O r- LC) r\ co t0 CT O Cl) 3 .o O to H
.-� M r` -4 CT O -4 N r- co mc O E
I-- Le) C9 • • e • • • • 4-3 L N 4-
LL r7 N .-� N N N N M V t O
• L +
r 3 to
Lto
N +-1 O d >)4-3
Z F- O O O O O O O O Ln r f\ -
O Cl W O O O O O O O O •r i C U
H U W d LP) t0 N Ln O N r` p M O
U LiL a
�--� }- M r-a t0 N CT t0 r- d L
2' W U d •-1 d O N d %.0 M CU O '> C 4-W
1- Z b- LO .-+ N M d CT co r` fs LL- y
N
CIO w to Ln Ln O
.-+ p =D to Ln to tg: 3 1) L a 4-)
0 Z U CO O CT O O .-+ M co L O L
-C O 4- G
a' Q L iZ d) .-
W N eo N A L N
1- W LL. J N M d CT t0 Lo O to ol CC +� L
1-4 Q J C> Q O C> • • • -r M -0 -r
• 3 Q H .--L .--1 r- r` CT t11 p C y
Cl) t/'1 b1z O 1.4 N N LO id C
O H 4- O CU
O_' •` O C e
W Q N dcc i-- O O O o O O O O C Ln .�
J C9 W W O O O o O O O O .--L Q L C N
co H W .--L tL7 r` M N r- co O • O O O
d' L) LO .-i r\ t\ r\ r\ O M N ro a) N E
LL- U U ♦-L M d O M r• CT M CU CU > •r LO
O •-• M Q1 O UD N co r L L N
co 1] 7 7 to CU
cn d � .--+ 1•-1 co CT co r` 10 m Q.-0 L
`-+ U r! M d 1- eo
Y W CU CU V �"y
CT C OO
r-_ M co M O N tD r-- to to d 1
ZCD 4 • • • • 1 3 CTO
Q 1.- -4 CT Ot d N r• r-: C OO L co
Li O LC) Ln LO t0 r\ t0 d t0 CU
O 1- C L7 E Y
d) Lx_
Y t-- O O O O O O O O tL .- •h
C W O O O O O O O O i- C -0
O LU CT f\ CT O O M N M L L-
0
b C
V) W C1 t0 o 0 Ln ttCT M r.. =CL O C
a-a C..> d ON N co M f, M co O O O O
Zcr W- d t0 O to N N N O - L 4-- da co
-i ccw
L O 0
d N n to t0 OO to M 4-1 N CT
U d t0 to CO r- t0 to -4 d ate+ ^ O r`
r- R 4-3 T
1 U y LA-
L.L.
LLa. J t0 M M M -4 Ln co co M
Q • • • • • • •
CT• M O r-1 M M C > p
O d d M M N N N .--1 Y .--L CU W 4-
n F- LL- 00 d- to
H O O O O O O O O O L y CU
W O O O O o O O O ..CO Cl-0
LLJ W d N O cn M O N d to W CU y
3 W co M Cl) CT t0 CT CT d eo gL ` N
C..> ^ CO r- O Ln d M .-4 •p C N to
•--L O Cl) co r� r-L O M co m 4) •
P w
N N t` M .--1 d .--L Lc; 0 N
U
i d d M M N N M N O co N - LO!)
N t LZ{ 10
n f` r'� r- � r� 00 CSD 7 4-S .1.+ L
O LA O O O
r
LLJ Ch d LA to 11 OO 01 q N LA-
V) ~ a d
s r-• Y h r- r� r� r` n co .-1 N
LL. O1 CT CT (7% a1 O) LT CT
7
i
As can be seen from Table 3.1, between 1977 and 1981 the Di strict's' pur-
chases from the City of Portland have increased an average of 40% annually
in order to satisfy growth within the District to supply the City of
Tualatin, and to make up shortfalls from well production and Lake Oswego
sales. The current price of the Bull Run water delivered to Bradley
Corners is $.59/100 cubic feet and based on the requirements of Article
11 of the agreement, the District is required to purchase a minimum of
17.5% of its total water demand from the City during FY 81-82.
F
i
In terms of total water consumption, as seen in Table 3.1 over the past
seven years, water consumption within the District has increased from 1. 77
mgd to 2.56 mgd or an average of 5% per year. Also, the percent of total
water supplied by Lake Oswego has remained relatively constant while the
precent produced by its wells has fallen and the percent purchased by
Portland has increased dramatically. However, after April 1983, when
Tualatin will purchase water from Portland directly through its new
Washington County supply line, the percent supplied by Lake Oswego will
increase and that supplied by Portland will decrease accordingly.
3.3 DISTRIBUTION AND STORAGE SYSTEM
3.3.1 - Distribution System
3.3.1.1 - Ph sical Description - The distribution system of the
Tigard Water district consists of a major grid of 12" ductile iron
(D.I. ) and cast iron (C.I.) pipes looped into a continuous system.
The local distribution laterals are mostly 6" and 8" C. I. with a
( few 4" mains on dead-end streets.
There are also two major system feeds but both are as yet incomplete.
One is a 24" pipe which links the Bull Run supply at Bradley Corners
with the terminal storage facility at 125th and Bull Mountain Road.
The other is a 16" D.I. pipe which links the Lake Oswego supply source
at I-5 and Bonita Road to the same terminal storage reservoir.
a 3.3.1.2 - Present Operational Characteristics - The distribution
network is divided into five separate pressure zones. The first
major zone serves the lower areas in Tigard with an overflow eleva-
tion of 410 feet and the second the area west of S.W. 121st on Bull
Mountain Road with an overflow elevation of 690 feet. The three
remaining pressure zones serve small areas around the summit of
Bull Mountain, the summit of Little Bull Mountian and the area west
of the intersection of Bull Mountain and Roshak Road. At present,
water from Lake Oswego or Bull Run is imported into the main low
pressure zone and pumped to all of the higher zones and reservoirs.
Pressures in two of the minor zones are stabilized with automatic
pressure relief valves. Computer analysis indicates pressures in
the overall system vary rather widely due to elevation differences
within zones and demand fluctuations. Maximum pressures of 115 psi
in the King City area require the use of individual pressure regula-
tion valves. Minimum pressures of 25 to 30 psi occur along Bull
Mountain Road on the upper slopes of Bull Mountain and around
Springwood and 121st Avenue.
8
i
Overall , however, pressure appears to be adequate with only minor
refinement of the pressure zone boundaries and loop completion
required. Fire flows in the systm are good to very good with most
large facilities having the flow required by the local fire depart-
ment and the Insurance Services Office (ISO) for insurance purposes.
3.3.1.3 - Future Operation - The District is planning to complete
the two major system feedlines described above in the near future.
Several smaller projects designed to complete distribution loops
will be constructed later. Computer analysis indicates that with
the completion of these projects, the system will be able to meet
the projected year 2000 peak day demand of 10.6 mgd. Fire flows
will remain acceptable and pressure will decline on the average
only 5 psi except in the northern area of the district which will
drop severely unless planned looping projects are completed.
There is the possibility that the area east of the District boundary
will be withdrawn from the system in the near future. This will make
virtually no difference in system demand, but the S.W. 72nd Avenue
main is important to fire flows in the southeast -corner of the Dis-
trict and to the Baylor tanks. The fire flows in the southeast
corner of the District would suffer severely with the disconnection
of the S.W. 72nd Avenue main proposed by the Metzger Water District.
Planned rearrangement of the storage system as described under
Section 3.3.2.3 will improve the ability of the distribution system
to absorb peak loads and fire flows. This is due to the higher
head available from the terminal storage area. Otherwise, the
distribution system will be relatively unaffected by this change.
z
3.3.2 - Storage System
3.3.2.1 - Physical Description - At present, the District has 17.4 mg
4 of storage on line. There are a total of nine tanks at six separate
sites. An additional 2.5 mg of storage is presently under construc-
tion at S.W. 135th and Fern Streets. This will bring the total
storage up to 19.9 mg. Two additional reservoirs are planned by
the .District on S.W. 150th Avenue for an eventual total storage of
approximately 23 mg.
The tanks are generally in good condition with only minor work
required. The steel tanks will , however, require painting in the
near future, probably within the next three or four years.
3.3.2.2 - Present Method of Operation - Two of the tanks serve the
upper pressure zone on Bull Mountain, with overflow levels of 690
feet. One 10 mg tank serves as a "terminal storage facility" with
an overflow level of 470 feet. The remaining tanks serve as distri-
bution storage for the lower pressure zone with overflow levels of
410 to 417 feet.
At present the upper zone reservoirs are supplied via the pump station
at site no. 2 just off Gaarde Road and S.W. 120th. The pump station
�: 9
at S.W. 135th and Fern is kept in reserve. The upper pressure zone
is then served by gravity except for a small pump station taking
care of the area directly adjacent to the tank.
The lower reservoirs are connected directly to the lower pressure
zone and are thus supplied directly by the District's primary source
of supply, be it Bull Run or Lake Oswego. All of the distribution
reservoirs are equipped with appropriate valving. There is also
one additional pumped system which serves the higher elevation ,
areas adjacent to the District shops on Canterbury Lane (Little
Bull Mountain).
The 10 mg "terminal storage" facility located on S.W. Bull Mountain
Road has an overflow elevation of 470 feet. This reservoir is at
present kept full via the pump station at site no. 2 off Gaarde Road
and S.W. 121st. The reservoir is used only for emergencies at present
and is manually controlled.
3.3.2.3 - Future Operational Characteristics - The District is
planning to make major changes in the method of system operation in
the near future. With the completion of the 24" and 16" major
input lines from the 10 mg tank to the Bull Run and Lake Oswego
master meters, the District will be capable of completly isolating
all inflow to the 10 mg tank. Future District plans call for running
all imported water into this terminal storage tank via the new lines
for distribution to the various areas of the District. This will
require all incoming water to be raised to the 10 mg tank's operating
level , somewhere around 470 feet. The 10 mg tank will then become
the distribution reservoir with the other tanks being kept full to
provide emergency storage.
3.3.3 - Commentary
3.3.3.1 - Distribution System - The distribution system appears to
be very adequate for carrying all present and projected loads through
the year 2000 assuming planned improvements are carried forward.
} While isolation of the large terminal storage feed lines would
improve the capability of the system, this should not be required
for the foreseeable future. Disconnection_ of the S.W. 72nd Avenue
main by the Metzger Water District as discussed above will force
the district to replace the section of main south of Bonita Road.
If this is not done, computer modeling indicates fire flows in the
southerly portion of the District will decline to approximately
half their present levels. This problem could be offset if hydrants
are available on the other large diameter pipes in this area.
3.3.3.2 - Amount of Storage - The District's average demand is pre-
dicted to be 4.3 mgd in t e year 2000. With completion of the 2.5
mg reservoir under construction, there will be 19.9 mg of storage
available. Thus the ratio of total storage to average daily demans
is 4.6, well above the usual ratio of 3. With the pipe grid avail-
able, this extra storage is not needed for distribution. The current
7
4
{
10
extra storage is apparently deemed necessary by the District to
cover interruptions in supply and possible future needs.
3.3.3.3 - Operation of Storage System - The District's operational
p ans or diverting all water through the 10 mg terminal storage
reservoir will have major effects on the system. It will require
all water to be pumped to the terminal reservoir's operating level ,
approximately 470 feet. While the system will be able to supply
sufficient water at adequate pressure, operating costs will take a
increase slightly due to the increased pumping required for lower
pressure Lake Oswego water. If Lake Oswego water was used exclu-
sively, the 2.6 mgd demand predicted for next year would result in
an additional power cost of $9,300 per year assuming an efficiency
of 65% and power cost of $.035 per kwh. This cost would be expected
to climb to approximately $16,000 per year by the year 2000. This
impact will increase the cost of water by approximately $0.0074 per
100 cubic feet at power costs of $0.055 per kwh.
This additional power cost could be reduced by -allowing the Lake
Oswego pumps to supply the lower pressure system directly with the
10 mg reservoir held in reserve, but equipped with automatic valves
for instant availability in case of emergency.
3.3.3.4 - General - It appears the District has been faithfully
following the general plan put forth by Stevens, Thompson and Runyan,
Inc. in its report of 1971 entitled, Water Supply and Distribution
Study. Since conditions have changed somewhat from those prevailing
when the report was written, it is important that future plans be
updated. While large amounts of storage at higher than system
average pressure may be appropriate for the high pressure Burlingame
system for example, such storage is not necessarily appropriate for
a district importing water at low pressure, such as from Lake Oswego.
In summary, the District's water system is in good to excellent con-
dition and adequate for expected future demands. Careful re-examina-
tion of planned changes in the District's operational methods,
however, should yield substantial savings to the District , especially
in power and capital costs for pump stations.
3.4 FINANCIAL STATUS
An evalua-t-To—n--oT the financial status of the Tigard Water District was
made by examining the District's budgets and budget reports for FY 82-83
and FY 81-82 and the audit reports for FY 80-81 through FY 77-78. The
District's accounts are maintained on the fund accounting basis as
required for budgetary reporting. The District's major funds consist of
the General Fund, the Bond Sinking (Debt Service) Fund, and Bond Construc-
tion Fund. The balance in the latter fund is zero since all funds 'in it
were expended as of June 3, 1979. Consequently, all capital improvements
f after this date have been financed out of the General Fund.
Table 3.2 shows the status of the Bond Sinking Fund from FY 77-78 through
FY 82-83. This fund is used to pay the principle and interest on seven
separate bond issues sold between October 1962 and December 1976. On
11
TABLE 3.2
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
BOND SINKING (DEBT SERVICE) FUND FOR FY 77-78 THROUGH FY 82-831
FY 82-83 FY 81-82
DESCRIPTION BUDGET EST. FY 80-81 FY 79-80 FY 78-79 FY 77-78
Beginning Fund Balance $*73,300 $158,918 $ 90,722 $149,575 $136,106 $254,638
Revenues:
Prop. $ related taxes 344,500 310,700 254,242 194,015 182,700 133,096
Interest 1 3,500 4,000 9,171 6,196 6,810 10,865
Total Revenues ts6 ATO TUT.-4-17 2W.T3-f -1 TF,-,1 1 ,9 1
Transfer from Gen. Fund 0 0 120,000 66,000 156,000 42,000
® TOTAL Xn--M W7T.-6i$ W7T,=
3 Expenditures:
Principal on Bonds 202,000 191,000 180,000 181,000 179,000 167,000
Interest on Bonds 116,519 125,887 134,853 143,700 152,678 161,150
Fiscal Agent Fees 395 370 364 364 363 362
i
Total Expenditures $M$.§T2F $TF7.2 5 7 $ $T25,6a $ 32, 1 TE8.512
L Tax Rate $/1000 .45 .45 .44 .40 .46 .421
!4
- 1 Information from Tigard Water District Proposed General Fund Budget,
FY 1982-83 and Tigard Water District 's Report on Examination of Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data - years ending June 30, 1978, 1979, 1980,
y.. and 1981, by..Cooper and Lybrand.
* Appears actual will be approximately $156,000.
12
c
r
e
TABLE 3.3
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
GENERAL FUND FOR FY 77-78 THROUGH FY 82-83
I F
ITEM BUDGET EST. FY 80-81 FY 79-80 FY 78-79 FY 77-78
Beginning Fund
Balance $ 452,000 $ 330,400 $ 154,523 $ 232,209 $ 75,150 $ 87,217
Revenues 2,048,000 1,750,000 1,848,667 1,362,028 1,160,150 884,021
Total T,5 666 080, 5g',237 1,235,30U 971,2
Expenditures:
Personal Ser. 423,000 397,800 390,911 361,327 302,862 234,887
Water Purchased 778,700 639,400 582,762 337,915 237,7733
2 357,430
Materials & Ser. 210,400 219,200 209,863 157,379 135,086 170,118
Capital Outlay 880,900 372,200 364,688 517,093 171,370 91,653
Total Expend. 2,293,000 1,628,600 1,548,224 1,373,714 847,091 854,088
Transfer to
Debt Service 0 0 120,000 66,000 156,000 42,000
Total $2,293,000 $1,628,600 $1,668,224 224 $1,439,714 1 003
> $ ,091 $ 896,088
Water Rate
per 100 C.F. .75 .75 .75 .65 .65 .50
1 Information is from Tigard Water District Proposed General Fund Budget, FY 1982-83
and Tigard Water District Report on Examination of Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data - years ending June 30, 1978, 1979, 1980, and 1981, by Cooper
and Lybrand.
2 Differs from water cost of $276,412 shown in Table 2.1 of June 1980, Tigard
Water District Water Supply Study.
. 3 Differs from water cost of $234,891 shown in Table 2.1 of June 1980, Tigard
Water District Water Supply Study.
13
K July 1, 1982, total indebtedness will be $2,287,000. Annual payments on
bond principle and interest will peak during FY 82-83 at $318,519 and
will decrease to $163,912 when all bonds are retired in FY 1995-96. FY
81-82 is the first year in which a transfer of money from the General
Fund has not been used to liquidate the debt. Because it is anticipated
that, as the bond debt decreases over the years, assessed valuation in
the District will increase, the tax rate can be decreased accordingly
assuming no new bonds are sold which are to be financed out of tax revenues.
When considering the sale of new bonds, it must be remembered that the
current bond debt will not be retired for another 14 years.
Table 3.3 shows the status of the General Fund from FY 77-78 through FY 82-
83. A number of items are worthy of note. The beginning balance has been
increasing substantially since FY 80-81. In addition, water sales have
increased greatly due to the fact that the District has supplied the
City of Tualatin with all its water since May 1980. Prior to this date,
water sales averaged approximately 70% of revenue, but since this date,
the percentage has risen to 90%. During FY 80-81 and FY 81-82, the District
sold approximately $361,000 and $395,000 respectively of water to Tualatin
at $.68/100 cubic feet, while the cost of that water to the District was
approximately $.32 per 100 cubic feet. Therefore, in FY 83-84, when
Tualatin obtains its water directly from Portland, the District's income
will drop by about $400,000 and the corresponding profit of approximately
$188,00 will no longer be available for District use.
In terms of expenditures, personnel services have historically made up
about 25% of the District's total expenses. However, for FY 82-83, they
will be only 18.5% due to the unusually large capital outlay and the fact
that the staff will be reduced from 13 to 11 employees. Water purchases
have increased dramatically due to the growth in consumption especially
with the addition of Tualatin in May 1980 and due to the fact that a
greater percentage of water purchases have been Bull Run water which is
almost twice as expensive as Lake Oswego water. However, in FY 83-84,
the amount of water purchases will fall because Tualatin will no longer
be a customer. Finally, the healthy amounts for capital outlay reflect
the District's vigorous line extension, line replacement and meter
installation programs. In addition, the capital outlay budget amount for
FY 82-83 includes $640,000 for a 2.5 mg reservoir to be located at S.W.
135th and Fern.
A final examination was made to compare the total cost of water to the
average Tigard residential customer with that of other residential cus-
tomers in surrounding cities and water districts. For the Tigard Water
District customer, the total cost of water consists of a combination of
the commodity rate of $.75 per 100 cubic feet plus the tax rate of $.45
per $1,000 of assessed value. There are two ways to combine the rates.
The first consists of taking the total amount of tax revenue raised for
the Water District and dividing it by the total water consumption for the
same year, which equates to $.20 per 100 cubic feet for FY 80-81, and
adding this to the commodity rate of $.75 per 100 cubic feet for a total
of $.95 per 100 cubic feet. Thus the customer pays $8.00 bi-monthly plus
$.95 for each 100 cubic feet over the 800 cubic foot minimum amount.
_ This method is shown as Modified Water Rate Structure I in Table 3.4.
14
a,
iw LA) e
F d e6 tO tI) to Ll) N Ln .--r Ln d
4 E ix Ln to Cl) 1 M N 1- CO Ln n
Of • • • e • e • • •
t-e N 41 1
= &- C N
w O O 1
!- W CU C) •
Q QC 1
N
d
� L
O U (1) d N 1 E
W O t +b -0 O O O 1 O O O to O d O
4- +3 rt b O O -4 O O Ln t0 O Cl) N
•-" [n -0 O 9= ¢ N .-i N 1 cv I� N O t0 ll) C
O
i CA rt x W
N m CO m J A
m
aj
¢ N
C O
O QJ O J L
W N•r- +c 'o d
S•- i-) eG 'o lC) '--e
t= -~ C3-inc
E ¢ Ln to Cl) d M N rn Ln Ln rn ro
I-Wc o L� to ¢
3 F-
o = A F-
W Or r d
H 4 1--- L .1.3 O O O O O O O to O d •>
1- LL- N 4-3 e6 O O Ln O O O 1\ O
U O G O N -4 ri Z C•"i N o e+i t8 a7
C-) C:) M: 0) '4 re .--4 .--e .--e N
d
X
v~i w m m 4 rt
1. i-�
O 3 O o2J L ~
E
of 4-A • N O ¢ O
W J C C r L
d Q .¢-� 4) db4 O
4-
d
M Z W to W C TS 1 d
OW 1- •r-
W C<' O Q d E t0/1 G) O to 1 N O Ln 0) d N
-1 ¢ = 0) N N C C O C Ln d to C Ln •O
m C.^. N 4-� U1 •
O N C gn Z Z • ZO • • .--� Z d
4-� A N 1
F- rt v) C Q L
O O L .+.)O 1
x (V e
N Z rt 4-31--
to
..)•rto rt -41 d
N N 3 M:vT d
QQ Y L tOn 4-
Z O r
Q f OC > t • �
O O U LL_ y >
CJ C L • Ln C
O L O CU to Ln O O Ll) N Ll') .-4 Ln d
O
W 4- d CL 117 t0 M ON M N 1,. co In
+ f`
CG � 1-� O • • • . • • • • • E y
O G ra E O
F- 3 .-+ ev N
E
U O E H
N L•r-b4
.0 N
4-2 to
N U g O
w a) , o
F o$ N O
c rt • • . •
d O
L.L . N tD
U- . ti LL_ !L
Li <L a) V}
� L OC� O • U •
W i.) O OUO LO UO O UO v G.7
U • •
¢ COu a O OO 1.4N O O O Ln O O to U O U U L ep
�' V
3 rt E
CD -4 O %0Oen ON Ln06OriOt0O �.CD
•r L L L L L L L.--1 L L� L
an d •� O O O O O O O O O O •3
4-
rt •" L E
S m O
C t
i O
� T iZ1
O G O
O L
j L.Li} 4-3 L O N L C C) T > L O E
.O O 4) e® O -0 q.a C U N J
> > r y N ;r. ,t L cc eC O C N
39 4-JL C1 CI 10 r -
m S J to a) O !T- H 3 .--1 N
� a
' 15
LEE ENGINEERING, INC.
45 '
W z
O
y d
J �
-
40 N
V Z
P
35
/
1- z
z
z_ o '
z < z � OHOcn 30
i
Z\GP
cn
i
Of W
Q w
J p 25
J F- i
O U
p p / ,� /
— N /20
W /11J ftvjpOO 1.225 /,/ ��,���
Q SNE
u 15 -
os' loor
S
F- p ------ter
/ `�/,�
OZ 10 '' '
V
NOTE
FIGURES IN PARENTHESIS I
5 ARE DOLLARS PER I00 I
€ 1 CUBIC FEET. 1
t
{
0 1000 2000
3000_
BIMONTHLY WATER USAGE IN CUBIC FEET
1' F IGURE 3: 1
COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL.
WATER COSTS
ON BASIS OF COMMODITY RATE a TAX RATE
16
1
The second way consists of assuming that at the tax rate of $.45 per $1000,
the owner of an average residential dwelling valued at $60,000 pays $27
per year or $4.50 bi-monthly in taxes to the Water District. This $4.50
is then added to the base water rate of $8.00 bi-monthly that the homeowner
must pay for the first 800 cubic feet of water regardless of whether or
not he uses it. All consumption over 800 cubic feet is paid at the rate
of $.75 per 100 cubic feet. This method is shown as Modified Water Rate
Structure II in Table 3.4.
Note that the two structures are two separate ways of looking at the
total cost of water. In other words, under Structure I, the Tigard Water
District homeowner may be viewed as paying $8.00 bi-monthly for the first
800 cubic feet of water whether or not he uses it, plus $.95 for each
additional 100 cubic feet. Under Structure II the homeowner may be viewed
as paying $12.50 bi-monthly plus $.75 for each 100 cubic feet above 800
cubic feet consumed. Because the average residential customer consumes
between 1,400 and 2,800 cubic feet per month, which is a relatively small
amount when compared with large commercial or industrial users, Structure
II represents more accurately the total cost of water to the residential
user.
The total costs of water shown under the Modified Water Rate Structure II
column of Table 3.4 are plotted in Figure 3.1. This shows that residential
customers in Tigard rank third out of nine in terms of paying the most for
water service in their regional area. It should be noted that data for
Metzger's water taxes was not available.
L
i
i
17
CHAPTER IV
FUTURE SITUATION
4.1 LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
® he Tigard Water istrict service area is predominantly a low to medium
® density suburban community of Portland. However, extensive strip com-
mercial development has occurred along Pacific Highway 99W, Highway 217,
and Hall Boulevard. Industrial development has occurred west of I-5
along the Burlington Northern and Southern Pacific railroad tracks and
along S.W. 72nd Avenue, south of Highway 217. Although outside of its
boundaries, Washington Square (a regional shopping center), and commercial/
professional office development in the Tigard triangle bounded by Pacific
Highway, Highway 217, and I-5, exert a dominant economic influence in the
Tigard Water District.
In terms of existing land uses, the 5,800 acre area of the City of Tigard
is presently zoned as follows: residential - 74%; multi-family - 4%;
commercial - 7%; and industrial - 15%. King City is. approximately 90%
residential and 10% commercial. The unincorporated area of Washington
County within the Water District boundaries is essentially all residential .
Therefore, approximately 75% to 80% of the Tigard Water District land area
is presently zoned for residential use.
In terms of future land use, it appears that over the next 20 years, the
Tigard Water District's service area will continue to be a fast growing,
residential , suburban community of Portland. The mix of land uses within
the unincorporated Washington County area and within King City will remain
the same, while within the City of Tigard, the percent of residential land
will decrease to 65% and the percent of multi-family, commercial and
industrial land will increase to 9%, 11% and 15% respectively.
Projections indicate that population within the Tigard Water District
service area will increase substantially over the next 20 years as shown
in Table 4.1. On the basis of Table 2-1, of the Appendix for the Recom-
mended Transportation Plan for the Metropolitan Area, March 1982, by the
Metropolitan Service 'District (METRO), it i estimates that the Tigard
Water District population will increase from 21,000 in 1980 to 37,000
in year 2000. This represents an overall increase of 76% or an annual
increase of 2.9%.
However, based on its comprehensive planning efforts, the City of Tigard
projects a 106% increase in its population over the next 18 years or an
annual growth rate of 4.1%. This indicates that the percent of the Dis-
trict's population which lives within the City of Tigard will increase
over the years.
�` 18
TABLE 4.1
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR % GROWTH
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 20 YEARS
City of Tigard 16,000 24,000 33,000 106%
Tigard Water District 21,500 25,000 29,000 31,000 37,000 76%
4.2 WATER CONSUMPTION PROJECTIONS
Future water consumption in terms of average daily demand was projected by
multiplying the population estimates in Table 4.1 by the average daily per
capita water consumption of 115 gallons as reported on Page 18 of the June
1980, Tigard Water District Water Supply Study. Historically, per capita
demands have increased with time. However, in recent years, they have
appeared to stabilize and the trend to water conservation will tend to
decrease them. Therefore, to account for the fact that commercial and
industrial uses are projected to increase slightly more than residential
uses over the next 18 years, no increase in the per capita demand is
anticipated. The peak day demands were then determined by multiplying the
average daily demands by a peaking factor of 2.5. Table 4.2 shows the
results.
TABLE 4.2
Projected Averaqe Daily and Peak Day Water Demand
1982 1985 1990 1995 2000
Average Daily Demand (mgd) 2.6 2.9 3.3 3.8 4.3
Peak Day Demand (mgd) 6.5 7.2 8.3 9.5 10.6
4.3 WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES
4.3.1 - Introduction
In order to meet its projected demands, the following water source options
may be available to the Tigard Water District:
1. Clackamas River water from Lake Oswego.
d
2. Bull Run water from the City of Portland via the Burlingame pumped
system or the Washington County gravity supply system.
3. Trask-Tualatin water from the Joint Utilities Commission.
4. Willamette River water through development of a surface supply or
Ranney Collector.
19
Each option and sub-option is evaluated below in terms of quantity of
water available, timing of water availability, costs, and institutional
and financial constraints.
As explained above, development of groundwater within the boundaries of the
Water District is not a viable option because of the critical groundwater
t area designation and limitations on pumping.
4.3.2 - Clackamas River Water
As discussed earlier, the City of Lake Oswego has just recently increased
the capacity of its water treatment plant to 16 mgd and the capacity of
its Waluga Reservoir to 4 mg. Because its present peak demand is 11 mgd,
the City can produce up to 5 mgd of surplus water which it is willing to
sell to the Water District on an "as available" basis under the terms of
the existing agreement. Consequently, the District has added a third
1,650 gpm pump to its booster station near I-5 and Bonita Road in order to
increase peak pumping capacity to approximately 6 mgd.
The cost of this water to the District is currently $.31/100 cubic feet,
but the price is projected to increase to $.40 within a year after the
City staff and Council complete the rate review process. Further rate
increases will parallel the cost escalation of electricity, chemicals and
f labor necessary to treat and pump the water.
The question of availability of this surplus water depends directly on the
rate of Lake Oswego's growth. The August 1977 Revised Water S stem Stud
for the City of Lake Oswego projects that the City--s peak demandwill equa
the 16 mgd capacity of the water treatment plant in 1991, necessitating
another expansion of the plant to 21 mgd and an increase in transmission
line capacity to and from the plant. What this means for the Tigard Water
District is that between now and 1990, the availability of surplus water
will diminish in direct proportion to Lake Oswego's increase in water
demand as it did in the late 1970's before the plant was expanded to its
present capacity. The expansion to 21 mgd is projected by the same study
to meet demand until 1998, so the diminishing supply problem would repeat
{ itself once again before the year 2000. Deficits in demand would have to
be made up from another source such as Portland's Burlingame system. And
as illustrated in Figure 4.1, this deficit in demand will increase over
time as Tigard Water District demand grows.
In terms of the Tigard Water District's obtaining a firm supply of water
from the Clackamas River, Lake Oswego may, at some future date, be willing
to consider joint development of its supply. However, because existing
water rights for water supply are over-allocated relative to the available
supply during low flow periods, more upstream storage capacity would have
to be constructed to meet minimum flow requirements. These circumstances
present institutional and financial constraints which may make the Clacka-
mas River infeasible as a long-term source for the Tigard Water District.
4.3.3 - Bull Run River Water
t
Five years remain in the year agreement between the Tigard Water District
and the City of Portland for provision of a firm supply of surplus water.
20
s -
t
ci
E Z
0 -
W
Y
W
d W
a
W 0
N W
U w F W
O W
Cc Z ~ Ck Q J
F-
(n f- W W
O > 0 p
W a. OQ O ZQ N v
W3ayo. No Y O
Q LA-
(1) > a �� o a o
3p> cr � 0 7 W
ZO 0 CL a � -7 4
Ct- J LLI o ��d O- O
W C7 CL Cr a- �„A r `-' LcLI
cr F- d a O=
® 0100 p
ZLL. LL-
tno® C3
U) a U) u
>- Cr Q Q
-j F-a a
< �� fr
Q �d � as
o�
IL
~ o
v N
v aW a
SSS Je U �
dCa x
II.- O W
>> W
fA O j
UJ
3�p j H
CL
(INV VY 30
21
That contract provides that within 60 days after the 5th anniversary (June
25, 1982), either party desiring to renew the contract for an additional
ten years shall notify the other and the parties may proceed to negotiate.
The District so notified Portland that it wanted a 10-year renewal.
However, Portland countered with an offer of a 25-year contract which the
other East Washington County water purveyors on the Bull Run system have
already signed. After much deliberation, Tigard Water District signed the
25-year contract on May 14, 1982.
These 25-year contracts were first offered by Portland in 1979 at the
same time the City overhauled its rate structure. The City wanted 25-year
commitments from all of the outside water purveyors so it could plan and
construct long-term improvements to its supply system including a 100 mgd
back-up water source from the groundwater aquifers along the Columbia
River. In order to make the contracts attractive, the City changed its
rate-making philisophy to the cost of service concept which resulted in
dropping of the systems development charge for all new outside City
customers and lowering of its rates to all outside' water purveyors.
In that water rates to outside purveyurs are now based on the cost of
service concept, water prices increase in direct proportion to the amount
of pumping required and distance over which that water is transported to
deliver it to the customer. In view of this fact, the Wolf Creek and
Metzger Water Districts and the City of Tualatin elected to buy Bull Run
water at the new 50 mg Powell Butte Reservoir and share the costs of
constructing a new pipeline to convey that water by gravity to Washington
County rather than to continue purchasing pumped water from the Arlington
Heights and Burlingame systems. The actual cost of that new 60" pipeline
including the cost of oversizing a section of a Portland line between the
Powell Butte Reservoir and S.E. 67th and Holgate is $15.9 million as
opposed to the original estimate of $19 million. From the Washington
County line, the Wolf Creek Water District will construct a main ranging
in size from 54" down to 30" and costing $7.5 million to transport that
water throughout the District. The Metzger Water District and the City of
Tualatin are constructing a 48" line from the termination of the 60" line
to the Metzger Reservoir complex at a cost of $2.5 million and a 36" line
from there to Tualatin's reservoir at an estimated cost of $3.13 million.
Each of the jurisdictions states that the cost of Bull Run water purchased
at Powell Butte for $.32/100 cubic feet plus the 20-year ammortized cost
of constructing its share of the necessary gravity transmission mains will
be equal or less than the $.71/100 cubic feet cost of water delivered to
Bradley Corners. Presently, the cost of water to Bradley Corners is $.59
but Portland will increase it to $.63 on July 1, 1982, and to $.71 when
the 60" gravity system goes into operation during April 1983.
In terms of future water prices, the cost of the gravity system is
essentially fixed by the ammortized construction cost while the price of
water purchased at the Powell Butte Reservoir will increase at a much
lower rate than that for water from the Burlingame or Arlington Heights
systems which will inflate with the cost of electricity for pumping.
Therefore, the gravity system will provide less expensive water than
Portland's pumped systems.
22
Y
LAJ F-
terCJI
w Ln O O v� c
Y Q 3 Ln Cn Lc; • t
J U O Ln .•-4 W cm C
Cl-
CL O 4J L
d S b N
N 4-3
rcl, c ro
Y J LC) r O 0 3
j ? Z U C • O •--•
j C= Cl-
Ln
o •
Ln C3 W O Q e\ LA No we 2
•fl z w L.> 'd- CO
CD E F-OQO Ln v0 rt rn
7 to LLL- m f O d d
� z
a O Y to m
d J ?- C •r lY
C d .- F- i-J =3 N
W t1 t0 t•-t Cm O N L to
W H = U • • e • O b L2
Q m Ln .--t O� ['f r N �
O d M
3 W Y z O v J� m t l
r F- J 4J LsJ
ZY Cl LLJ -< O O C C
dd' = N O = ca 57- > t0 R1
F- O Cn d L C
C-11 U J y O y4-2
g � Z a r+ +•+ T o
9 F- a d N a t0 t0 d
1E N 90
cm N O 1- C i tC '- 4-� C
L 4-
CC Ln .-r d a V O
E >,
M F- Q = N J • 1-4 L G C •{+-•
• Q 3 0 = A ^ N d •r U
3 U e • • t0 r
h- M d M �
W N Z N C E cm >>
J O ep d C r N
m Q LLJ !- E +-) T L1 3
t Q C7 co .--� co to +J Q O
!- •--� = Z �'� t0 LO a r
a = cn N co Vto 0 Vf r
O r 4r v Oa% d d C +J �VO-
N -j 3 G � � 4-J C •fir VT
ra
d 2!:
Z • .--� C V t>6
¢¢ N Of d 01 O e r a d
N NCD o
E(E( Q Q -4N Q/ L %0 O
G m a O
Z
LLJ •
%A• M LA r- C 'p O aC
N C) O a) a2 Ln
LLJ LLJ C C Ln •
G Z Ln T C T e N
O LJJ T tp c -4
O a • .•.� C F- 0 CO
Z O d �' • tC d O M C
O N r-t N N L
F- O R
U 4 c 4-� E
LLJ
•r +.J E +J 0.1
d L iJ N N J.
+J v o o v c�
N •r
cm L T O
D y L
V) aJ to to m e a¢
o � •t o J E 0_ 41 L LO
.--t
4J 4J 3 t v 3 cm
L
U N Y •*� r Y +� 1
t"t to +J aJ R7 d aJ
N N H 3 L O L U
+-
t L 4- L J a7 +J 4-2 L
^rt O F- r N •O r V4 to
tom-• 4-2O� 3 N
3 U E N cn
23
oil: 11;10
In terms of availability, the City of Tigard may obtain Bull Run water
from either the Washington County supply system or Portland's Burlingame
system. However, with respect to the former systems, 88.5% of the capacity
of the 60" gravity line is owned by the Wolf Creek Water Distruct which in
,l, turn assigned 15% to the Metzger Water District and 18% to the City of
Tualatin, leaving Wolf Creek with 55.5%. The remainder of the line's
capacity is apportioned at 1.5% to Raleigh Hills and 10% to Portland.
w Therefore, Tigard Water District must negotiate directly with one of the
three East Washington County purveyors for water from the gravity system.
Table 4.3 compares the projected demands of each of the three East Washing-
ton County purveyors with their purchased share of the gravity line's 61 mgd
capacity. The table shows that by 1990 the peak day demand of the three
jurisdictions will equal or slightly exceed their alloted capacity of 54
mgd. This means that if Tigard Water District is able to negotiate an
agreement to buy surplus water from one of the three jurisdictions, water
will only be available in decreasing amounts until 1990. The capacity of
the 60" line could be increased to approximately 85 mgd by the addition
of a pump station or the construction of Conduit 5 which will be able to
provide increased pressure directly from the Bull Run dam. However, if
and when the 60" line capacity is increased, it will just be able to
accommodate the year 2000 demand projected for Wolf Creek, Metzger and
r
Tualatin.
It should be noted that all three jurisdictions have informally indicated
a willingness to sell water to the Tigard Water District, but it would be
only on an "as available" basis and significant tie-ins, especially from
Wolf Creek, would be required.
Because Wolf Creek, Metzger, Raleigh Hills and portions of Portland will
be transferred from the Burlingame system to the gravity system in April
1983, Burlingame peak demand will decrease from approximately 30 mgd down
to 10 mgd. Since the Burlingame system has a capacity of 31 mgd, there
will be ample capacity to serve all of Tigard Water District's needs beyond
year 2000. Therefore, a firm supply of surplus Bull Run water is available
to serve the District's future needs, but it will only be available at a
premium price.
4.3.4 - Trask-Tualatin System
!Fie ras - ua a zn sys em, originally developed by the City of Hillsboro,
is owned, as of April 17, 1979, by Hillsboro (50%), Beaverton (30%), and
Forest Grove (20%) and is operated by a Joint Utilities Commission con-
sisting of representatives from the three cities. The system consists of
a dam and reservoir on the eastern portion of the Trask River watershed
which is located on the west side of the Coast Mountain Range. Water
from the reservoir is diverted through the Coast Range to the Tualatin
River by means of a tunnel. A 20 mgd water treatment plant above Dilly
treats water from the Tualatin River and pumps it to the 21 mgd Spring
Hill Reservoir and from there into Hillsboro for distribution. In addition
to the Trask Reservoir, the system relies of a share of water from the
( Scroggins Dam in order to produce a current safe yield of 23.3 mgd
from the Tualatin River for municipal uses.
24
Presently, the peak summer demand of the three municipalities approaches
the 20 mgd capacity of the water treatment plant. Therefore, the Joint
Utilities Commission foresees expanding the plant and raising the height of
the Trask Dam within the next five years. The water treatment plant is
designed to be expanded to 60 mgd in two additional phases in order to
meet the year 2000 projected neds of the three cities. In addition, the
Joint Utilities Commission states that the storage capacity of the Trask
Reservoir can be increased sufficiently so that when combined with its
rights to Scroggins reservoir water the system will yield 60 mgd of
t municipal water.
IIn terms of availability of Trask - Tualatin water to the Tigard Water
District, Beaverton presently sells water to the District on an emergency
basis through a small intertie at $.565/100 cubic feet plus a 10% markup
charge. However, the Joint Utilities Commission will not have a firm
supply of surplus water until the Trask Reservoir, water treatment plant,
reservoir and transmission mains are expanded to 40 mgd. It appears that
at that time the Commission may be willing to allow Tigard to become a
Part owner of the system. As evidenced by Beaverton's 1979 cost of almost
$7 million for purchasing its 30% share of the dam, treatment plant,
reservoir and transmission lines, the cost of Tigard Water District's
buying-in will undoubtedly be considerable. However, at this time,
estimates of that cost would be meaningless. None the less, the Trask-
Tualatin system will be an option for the Tigard Water District to
investigate for use sometime after 1985.
4.3.5 - Willamette River - Of all the source alternatives proposed for the
Tigard Water District, the Willamette River is the only one which is not
developed to date in the Portland area. Because developing a new water
source is a costly undertaking, the question should be asked as to who
might be interested in developing the source with the Water District during
the next five to ten years as available surplus water supplies from other
purveyors become increasingly scarce. As discussed above, Beaverton and
Hillsboro can meet their year 2000 projected needs from the Trask-Tualatin
system. Lake Oswego has sufficient :nater rights to meet its future needs
until year 2000 assuming the minimum flow problems of the Clackamas River
can be resolved. The cities of Sherwood and Wilsonville appear to have
adequate groundwater resources to meet their year 2000 projected needs as
well. Finally, the City of Tualatin and the Wolf Creek and Metzger Water
Districts have sufficient capacity from the 60" gravity main to meet their
projected 1990 needs and the option to increase that capacity through
construction of a pump station or conduit 5 to meet their year 2000 needs.
Therefore, it would appear that the Tigard Water District would be forced
to develop the Willamette River by itself if it chooses to do so in the
near future.
Two alternatives for developing the Willamette River are examined in detail
below:
1. Surface water at Wilsonville.
2. Infiltrated water at Newberg.
25
Both alternatives originate from previous studies. The former was first
proposed in the January 1969, Tualatin Basin Water and Sewer Master Plan
and then developed in more detail over t e _n_e_x__t__U years in five other
engineering reports as the East Washington County water purveyors attempted
to decide whether to develop this source or to sign 25-year supply contracts
with the City of Portland. For purposes of this study, it was assumed
that a water intake structure and water treatment plant with high head
pumps would be constructed at Wilsonville. A 10.6 mile, 36" diameter
transmission line would transport the water to the 10 mg terminal storage
reservoir. Because of the great elevation difference between the river
and the reservoir, a booster pumping station located along the transmission
main would be required. All facilities would be sized and constructed to
meet the District's projected year 2000 peak day demand of 10.6 mgd.
In terms of treatment requirements, an analysis of the Willamette River
water quality at Wilsonville was conducted by Stevens, Thompson and Runyan,
Inc. from October 1975 to October 1976. This analysis indicated that
conventional treatment processes of fioculation, sedimentation and filtra-
tion would produce water meeting June 1977 Oregon standards. However,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations effective since the end
of 1979 require removal of synthetic organic compounds. This can best be
accomplished by carbon adsorption in addition to conventional treatment.
Therefore, the treatment process assumed for this alternative consists of
conventional treatment with granular activated carbon incorporated in the
filter medium.
The alternative for developing infiltrated water at Newberg was proposed
in the June 1980, Tigard Water District Water Supply Study. This report
invisions using Ranney Collectors which consist of reinforced concrete
i caissons sunk near the riverbank from which laterals are projected
horizontally into the alluvial sands and gravels to collect water under
the river. The caisson serves as a clearwell from which the water is
pumped.
In its October 24, 1980, study entitled. Report on Hydrogeological Survey
Y for the Tigard Water District, the Ranney Method Western Corporation, which
Wilds the.patent on the anney Collector stated that the Ash Island area
near Newberg is one of three areas along the Willamette River near Tigard
which has sufficient alluvial sands and gravels for development of a major
water supply using the Ranney method. Furthermore, as a result of two
pumping tests conducted on test wells drilled along the Willamette River
bank opposite Ash Island, the Ranney Corporation concluded that two Ranney
Collectors located and constructed as recommended in the report would
produce a minimum of 12 mgd of water.
As to quality of water produced by the Ranney Collectors, the report states
that, "...with the exception of iron and manganese, the water samples
collected from the test wells are below maximum contaminant levels as set
forth in the EPA Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. ...the inorganic
chemical quality of the water- pumped during the tests, including iron and
manganese, is higher than that of the Willamette River. This is to be
expected since groundwater was discharging into the river at the time of
the tests and therefore the water produced during the tests was primarily
26
s
i
f
TABLE 4.4
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
COST COMPARISON OF WILLAMETTE RIVER ALTERNATIVES
SURFACE WATER AT WILSONVILLE RANNEY COLLECTOR AT NEWBERG
CAPITAL CAPITAL
ITEM COST $1000 ITEM COST $1000
Intake and Pump Station 450 Ranney Collectors (2) 1,400
Booster Pump Station 280 Booster Pump Station 280
Treatment Plant: 6,450 Treatment Plant: 3,200 - 5,200
Conventional with filtration with
granular activated granular activated
carbon carbon
Transmission - 56,000 ft. 5,040 Transmission - 79,200 ft. 7,130
of 36" diameter pipe of 36" diamater pipe
River Crossings (2) 600
Land - 10 acres 10 Land - 10 acres 10
TOTAL CAPITAL COST $12,230 TOTAL CAPITAL COST $12,610 - 14,610
NOTE: Costs are in May 1982 dollars and include 30% for engineering and contingency.
ANNUAL ANNUAL
ITEM COST $1000 ITEM COST $1000
Ammortized Capitil Cost $1,437 $1,481 - 1,716
(10% bonds over 20 year--
Maintenance
ear;Maintenance & Repair 200 185 - 225
Manpower: (4 man years) 140 (2 man years) 70
Chemicals 100 75
Electricity 95 100
TOTAL ANNUAL COST $1,972 $1,911 - 2,186
Cost per 100 C.F. in 1982 dollars
at 1985 average demand of 2.9 mgd: $1.35
$1.30 - 1.50
at 2000 average demand of 4.3 mgd: $.95 $.91 - 1.04
27
groundwater and not infiltrated river water. However, once the Ranney
Collectors have been constructed and pumping has commenced, the highly
t mineralized groundwater will be replaced with infiltrated river water and
�! the inorganic chemical quality will approach that of the river. Thus,
the iron and manganese contents, which slightly exceeded the EPA maximum
contaminant levels during the tests, can be expected to decrease to trace
amounts.
"Based on the results of the pumping tests and our experience with existing
Ranney Collectors in similar hydrogeological situations, the inorganic
chemical quality of the water produced from the Ranney Collectors will
approach that of the Willamette River, with individual mineral constituents
® remaining about 10 to 20% higher than those of the river. Furthermore,
j being naturally filtered, the water produced will be clear and free of
sand, silt, turbidity and pathogenic basteria."
Based on the foregoing statements, it was decided that conventional treat-
ment for turbidity removal will not be necessary. However, chlorination
and filtration should be provided for iron and manganese removal in case
1 these constituents fail to decrease below recommended limits. In addition,
because the water quality will approach that of the Willamette River,
graduated activated carbon should be provided in the filter media for
synthetic organic compound removal.
Therefore, for purposes of this study, it was assumed that two Ranney
Collectors with necessary pumps would be constructed at the test hole
site. Water would be pumped under the Willamette River to a water treat-
ment plant with high head pumps near Newberg. A 15-mile 36" diameter
transmission line would transport the water along Highway 99W to the 10
mg terminal storage reservoir. As with the first alternative, an inter-
mediary booster pumping station was also assumed.
The capital and annual costs for both alternatives were determined in May
1982 dollars (ENR = 3800) and are summarized in Table 4.4. Because of the
uncertainty in the type and degree of treatment required for the Ranney
Collector water, a range in capital costs was projected. The ammortized
capital costs were based on 20-year bonds at a 10% interest rate. The
average cost per 100 cubic feet of water was computed for both alternatives
in terms of 1982 dollars based on the projected 1985 and 2000 demands of
2.9 and 4.3 mgd respectively. The results show that although approximately
19% more expensive in terms of operation and maintenance costs, the surface
water will most likely be less expensive than the Ranney collector water
in terms of the total annual cost and cost per 100 cubic feet.
4.3.6 - Future Cost and Availability of Water Sources
After describing each of the water source options available to the Tigard
Water District, an attempt was made to project their future cost and
availability. The results are shown in Table 4.5 and Figure 4.2. The
price of each source in $/100 cubic feet was broken down into two
components:
1. The amount attributable to ammortized capital cost to be incurred by
the District to develop the source, which ::as assumed to be fixed over
the next 20 _years, and
28
2. The amount attributable to operation and maintenance costs which was
assumed to inflate each year at an average rate of 6%.
Since the Water District will be buying surplus water from Lake Oswego
through an existing distribution system, 100% of the price of Clackamas
River water was assumed to inflate at 6% per year. However, the estimated
price could rise more rapidly if the District is asked to help pay capital
costs in the future to increase the capacity of Lake Oswego's transmission
mains from its water treatment plant. The same assumptions were made for
Trask-Tualatin water supplied by the City of Beaverton.
According to the Portland Water Bureau, the wholesale price of Bull Run
water at the point of delivery will increase at the rate of inflation plus
3% until 1988 to recover Portland's costs for capital improvements, and
then after that date it will increase at the rate of inflation. Since
the price of Bull Run water delivered via the Burlingame system to Bradley
Corners will be $.71 as of April 1983, it was assumed that this price
would increase by 9% annually until 1988 and then by 6% until the year
2000. If the Tigard Water District is able to buy surplus Bull Run water
from the 60" gravity supply line, it was assumed that this water would be
available initially at a price equal to or less than the April 1983 price
of the Burlingame water. This price would consist of the $.32 per 100
cubic feet wholesale price of water delivered to Powell Butte, which
would inflate at 9% until 1988 and then at 6%, plus a fixed ammortized
capital cost of $.39 per 100 cubic feet, which would represent Tigard's
cost to use the 60" and 48" gravity lines owned by Wolf Creek, Metzger,
Tualatin and Portland.
From Table 4.4 the fixed ammortized portion of the total unit cost of
surface water from the Willamette at Wilsonville and hater from the Ranney
Collector were determined to be 73% and 78% respectively. The remaining
operation and maintenance portions of the total costs were assumed to
inflate by 6% per year. The 1982 costs listed in Table 4.4 were inflated
to 1983 assuming construction in that year. However, it should be noted
that as construction is delayed into the future, the ammortized construc-
tion cost portion will inflate which in turn will increase the dollar
E cost per 100 cubic feet.
As shown in Table 4.5 and Figure 4.2, between now and 1990, the least
expensive water in order of increasing cost will be from Lake Oswego, the
Bull Run gravity supply system and the Trask-Tualatin system. However,
because it appears that only surplus water will be available from these
F sources on an "as available" basis, they will be the least reliable. In
addition, as shown conceptually in Figure 3.1, as their own demand grows,
these suppliers will have decreasing amounts of surplus water available.
In fact, after 1990, the availability of all of these supplies on a surplus
basis is highly questionable and should not be relied upon by the Tigard
Water District.
Therefore, because the, low cost options will most likely be unavailable
after 1990, this leaves the most expensive options of Burlingame water and
the Willamette River waters as Tigard's only alternatives for a firm
29
TABLE 4,5
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
PROJECTIONS OF COST AND AVAILABILITY OF WATER SOURCES
PROJECTED COST IN INFLATED DOLLARS
($ PER 100 CUBIC FEET)
SOURCE 1983 1985 1990 1995 2000
1. Clackamas water .401 .45+ .60+ Availabiiity question-
from Lake Oswego able and cost unknown
after 1990
2. Trask-Tualatin water from .66+2 .74+ .99+ Availability question-
Beaverton. (Beaverton's able and cost unknown
retail rate + 10% charge) after 1990
3. Bull Run from 60"
gravity supply system .71+3 .77+ .94+ Availability question-
able after 1990
4. Bull Run from pumped .714 .84 1.23 1.64 2.20
Burlingame system
5. Willamette River surface 1.425 1.47 1.61 1.80 2.06
water at Wilsonville?
6. Willamette River water 1.48+6 1.52+ 1.65+ 1.81+ 2.04+
from Ranney Collector — — —at Newberg 7
NOTES:
1 $.40 water rate inflating at 6% + unknown system development charges.
2 $.66 water rate inflating at 6% + unknown system development charges.
3 $.39 fixed ammortized cost + $.32 Powell BUtte water rate inflating at 9% to 1988.
4 $.71 water rate inflating at 9% to 1988 and then at 6%.
5 $1.04 fixed ammortized cost + $.38 inflating at 6%.
6 $1.15 fixed ammortized cost + $.33 inflating at 6%.
7 Costs of Willamette River alternatives assume construction in 1983. As construc-
tion is delayed into the future. the ammortized construction cost will increase
which increases the $/100 C.F. accordingly.
t
30
LEE ENGINEERING INC.
2.20
a.
J•
i
cn
ix
� 1 8
® _ WILLAMETTE RIVER
r RANNEY COLLECTOR �_o%�
�� �.s
-,,*,WILLAMETTE RIVER
SURFACE. WATER BULL RUN PUMPED
LL to 1.40 A
o U
O
LZ 0 1.20
�. V1
O Q
V J LocP
J i
O �1-®
Ld
.60 AVAILABILITY OUESTIONABLE AND
y—� —TRASK-TUALATIN PRICE UNKNOWN AFTER 1990.
LLI
7 0'� BULL RUN GRAVITY
.60
""--LAKE OSWEGO
.40
i
1983 1985 1988 1990 1995 2000
TIME IN YEARS
i FIGURE 4.2
ANALYSIS OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
i
PROJECTIONS OF COST
u AND
AVAILABILITY OF WATER SOURCES
31
source of supply to meet its projected future demands. As seen from the
Figure 4.2, the Willamette River options appear to be less costly in the
long run than Burlingame water. However, this assumes construction of
one of the Willamette River alternatives in 1983 which is most unlikely.
A more likely senario is construction between 1985 and 1990. However, by
that time, construction costs will most likely inflate to the point where
Burlingame water will be the less costly. In addition, the September
1980, Tigard Water District Bond Feasibility Study prepared by the First
NationaT-8-a—nkofregon raises considerable question about the District's
ability to handle the debt service impacts of a $12 to $16 million bond
issue to finance one of the Willamette River alternatives.
Therefore for the short term, the Tigard Water District can continue to
buy water at the lowest price from anyone who is willing to sell surplus
water. But in the long term, the District must turn more and more to
alternative supplies of water. At this time, the Burlingame water appears
to be the most reliable and least cost option. However, this option will
-- require that the District's retail rates be raised substantially in the
future. In addition, if a commitment is not made in the near future, the
City of Portland may not be able to meet Tigard's long-term needs since
they need to know Tigard's intent in order that they can adequately plan
for their long-term needs and capital investment project.
i
6
�g
32
®
TURRH RUH [ HU PHIME MIRIct
P.O. BOX 27 • TU I ALATIN OREGON 97062 • PHONE 682-2601 • RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF
s v �
May 24, 1982
TO: Tigard City Council
FROM: Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District
RE: Fire Protection Ramifications of Assumption of Water District
Liabilities by the City of Tigard
The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has traditionally provided
cost-conscious emergency services to its' citizens, and will continue
to do so. There is a great deal more involved in the provision of
cost-efficient emergency fire protection, however, than can be impacted
by the budgetary processes of the fire district alone. Reciprocal
cooperation between government agencies is an absolutely essential in-
gredient in the formula.
With particular regard to the availability of emergency and standby
water, the following three factors are crucial :
1 . The total amount of water available within the system.
2. The capability of the system to move water throughout
the community.
3. The availability of the water supply to the fire department,
wherever and whenever it is needed.
Excellent historical cooperation between the Tualatin Fire District and
the Tigard Water District, for example, has resulted in a Class 3 fire
insurance rating for the residents of the City of Tigard. Depending
on the exact location and value of a given home, this very good fire
insurance classification (Class 1 is the best) could result in an approx-
imate fire insurance premium savings of 30% to 45% under what the premium
would be if the classification was 2 or 3 points higher. Premium savings
for businesses could be even more significant.
From the standpoint of total costs for services, the following points merit
consideration:
1 . Standby water charges for sprinkler systems.
A. These charges impact total fire protection costs to the
business owner in several ways. The owner must first
determine, from a purely business standpoint, how the
amortization of the sprinkler system itself will affect
future plans. The owner must then factor in the cost of
2 -
standby water and the difference in insurance premiums
between a sprinklered and unsprinklered building. If
the standby charges are too high to jusitfy, the owner
may choose to delete the sprinkler system from the building.
This decision will not only raise the fire insurance premiums
to the owner, but it very probably will result in a larger
fire (should one start) than might otherwise be expected =
thereby necessarily increasing the number of fire personnel
and apparatus required to extinguish the fire. If this
trend is continued over time, it will ultimately necessitate
a significantly larger (and proportionately more expensive)
firefighting force than might otherwise be required.
2. Maintenance ,of sufficient water system capacity to assure required
fire flow.
A. If required fire flow (in gallons-per-minute) is not available,
then the scenario in point #1 is moot, since the business
owner will not even have the option of considering sprinkler
protection. What would be even worse is if an inadequate
fire flow existed in the water mains for fire department use
in extinguishing what could potentially be a larger fire than
if the building was protected by sprinklers (a real potential
example of a "Catch 22") .
3. Hydrant installation fees.
A. Presently, the fire district pays no hydrant installation fees.
Part of this trade-off includes that the fire district parti-
cipates in hydrant testing and maintenance. The need for
personnel to be familiar with hydrant location and capacity
results in every hydrant in the district being visited by fire
personnel on a scheduled basis. Since that need is required,
and on-going, it makes sense to involve fire district personnel
in the hydrant maintenance program. In turn, this activity
results in saved manhours for the water district. Any change
in this arrangement should be weighed carefully, as it could
impact the total cost of both fire protection and water services.
The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District has an obvious and significant
interest in water administration and delivery within its ' boundaries, as
those considerations impact both the quality and cost of the services we
provide. It is our position that the Tigard Water District has been an
exemplary example of how previously mentioned inter-governmental cooperation
can work to provide the highest possible level of coordinated services at
the lowest possible cost to the taxpayer.
. With this presentation, we respectfully request that the Tigard City Council
very carefully weigh : the cost/service implications of assuming water district
liabilities, from the standpoint of what is the most cost-efficient method
of providing equal levels of service.
3 -
Thank you very much for this opportunity to provide input, and if any
questions remain, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
ennethR. Morss �
ivision Chief, Emergency Services
TRFPD
KRM/rg
cc: Chief Russ Washburn
May 20, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Public '.forks Department
SUBJECT: 1982 Overlay "Bid Award" ecommendation
Bids were received from the following:
Bidder's Name Unit Price Extended Total
1. K.F. Jacobsen & Co. , Inc. (24.90) $188,343.60
(24.90)
2. Cascade Construction Co. , Inc. (25.84) $195,453.16
(25.84)
3. Oregon Asphalt (27.25) $206,119.00
(27.25)
4. Portland Road & Driveway Co, Inc. (28.43) $215,044.52
(28.43)
5. Columbia-West Co. (29.25) $219,124.20
(28.95)
6. Riedel International (35.00) $222, 284.00
(29.00)
7. Baker Rock Crushing Co. (30.39) $229,869.96
(30.39)
8. Parker Northwest Paving Co. (31.00) $234,484.00
(31.00)
9. Tobey's Excavation (35.65) $268,595.20
(35.50)
All bids were properly signed, all bidders were prequalified and all bids
were accompanied by a ten percent bid bond.
Therefore, it is herewith recommended that the City Council award the contract
for this years overlay work to the low bidder, being K.F. Jacobsen & Co. , Inc. ,
for the unit price of $24.90 per ton (asphaltic concrete in place) .
r � �
BID OPENING — 1982 STREET OVERLAYS
MAY 4, 1982 — 3:00 P.M.
TIGARD CITY HALL, 12755 SW ASH AVENUE
NAME BID BOND BID AMOUNT SIGNED
Cascade Construction
Portland, Oregon 107 $195 ,453.76 X
K. F. Jacobsen
Portland, Oregon 107 188,343.60 X
Parker Northwest Paving
Oregon City, Oregon 107 234 ,484.00 X
Portland Road & Driveway
Portland, Oregon 107 215 ,044.52 X
Riedel International
Portland, Oregon 107 222,284.00 X
Columbia West
Portland, Oregon 107 219,124.20 X
Tobey's Excavating
Hillsboro, Oregon 107 268,595.20 X
Baker Rock Crushing
Beaverton, Oregon 107 229,869.96 X
Oregon Asphalt
Portland, Oregon 107 206,119.00 X
Low Bid Unit Price = $24.90 or $188,343.60
Engineer 's Estimate Unit Price = $29.70 or $224,650.80
ref
31 7 / i _
P -el- 's
T, 7,D
May 20, 1982
t..
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Frank A. Currie, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Architectural Barriers Removal -- Bid Award Recommendation
Three bids were received:
1. C.F.R. General Contractor . . . . . . . $22,435.35
2. River City General Contractor . . . . . . $27,823.53
?. Frady Construction Company . . . . . . . $82,602.00
River City General Contractor had not submitted a pre-qualification statement.
C.F.R. General Contractor and Frady Construction Company are pre-qualified and,
further, all bidders did submit the required ten percent bid bond.
Therefore, it is herewith recommended that the City Council award the contract
to the low bidder; namely, C.F.R. General Contractor for the unit price of
$209.00 per wheelchair ramp and $12.45 per lin. ft. of sidewalk (total price
not to exceed $22,435.35) .
ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS REMOVAL 1981-82
May 14, 1982 at 3:00 p.m. D.S.T.
BIDDER'S NAME PROPOSAL GRAND TOTAL BID BOND PREQUAL.
Gradeline Constr. none ___ ---
Warren Pacific Corp. none -__ _-_
Daves Cement Contractor none ___ ---
Columbia Excavating none ---
Frady Constr. 82,602.00 yes yes
Sunray Concrete none -__
River City General Contr. 27,823.53 yes no
C.F.R. General Contr. 22,435.35 yes yes
Cedar Point Builders none -_- ---
Jim Christopherson none ___ ---
6D City Recorder
ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS REMOVAL 1981-82
May 14 , 1982 at 3:00 P.M. D.S.T.
Proposal Grand 'Total
Bond Prequai
Bidder's Name
r Gradeline Constr. ,
n c=
Warren Pacific Corp.
Daves Cement Contractor
Columbia Excavating
Frady Const.
Sunray Concrete
River City General Cont. a ��
r _.
R. General Cont.
� C.F.
Cedar Point Builders
Jim Christopherson
May 20, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Jeremy Coursolle, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Standards
During the last few mor_ths, there has been an increasing difficulty in ad-
ministering the existing zoning ordinance due to the inconsistencies and lack
of flexibility described in the permitted and conditional use sections of each
zoning district.
To alleviate these problems, staff suggested that permitted uses be combined and
described as use types, i.e. general retail, rather than pet store, book store
or flower shop. Additionally, staff defined conditional uses as only those use
types that have major impacts within a zoning district, i.e. a school within
residential zone.
Another problem related to conditional uses is that there are no standards or
criteria described in the zoning ordinance in which to evaluate the merits of a
conditional use proposal. Staff has incorporated these criteria and standards
into the redrafting of the conditional use section of the zoning ordinance.
The following recommended additions to the zoning ordinance are attached to this
memorandum: Section 18.72 - Conditional Use process; Section 18.20-18.52, which
list the permitted and conditional use types within each zone; the use type
classifications, which define each use type and a matrix of use types (the matrix
is not proposed to be incorporated into the zoning ordinance.
On May 18, 1982, the Planning Commission reviewed staff's final proposal and recom-
mended to the City Council that they approve staff's proposals.
Since the Planning Commission recommendation, staff further reviewed those use
types that would be permitted in multiple family zones. It is staff's recommen-
dation that single family detached dwellings should also be included in multiple
family districts on lot sizes now permitted within each zoning district which
are: A-12 - 3,630 square feet, A-20 - 2,178 square feet and A-40 - 1,089 square
feet. Permitting this use type would allow many property owners to utilize small,
otherwise unusable lots and allow for more flexibility in dwelling unit types
within multiple family zones.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
At this time, staff is requesting that the City Council review the proposed zoning
ordinance text changes recommended for approval by staff and the Planning Commission.
Therefore, no action is neer' On June 14, 1982 staff will present an ordinance
to City Council for adoptir _, :�f *nese proposed text; changes.
N 1 ( y, ` a. w a.
1 _
CWI v w a4 a. a' a'
v w w P. w w
w a. a. w U w OLw
U
In a. w w U a a. n. w a'
1
U
S c•� a. w U 0. w v w w a
U
c`� w w w v w a. V a4. w w
t
3
.t w CQ U U V U w04
U
U
O
o p.
P4 U
r`
a
o
a )
� d
1
34 114 24 114 IJ a4
W
CD
a' c'' w w a4 w
+� 4
a w w U U U w � c) U V U v v v
d
In w V V V V w U V U U U
n w U V CU-)
U w U U U U V
4 0 w v U V V 13+ V U U U U
E w'
co
i-1
1r
U31 oa. UU U UUU w U U c� c� U
w � -4
cd co
y G 0 •E+ Ei G
N .0.1 d O 0) t0 N d N N > c0 c0 E�
N N H U .b N -4 U 0) 0) H
U 5 0 w co
v d a) ..--41
-
G N > O N yH N . c -0 N
, c d JJ N >
.-� to al > H Lc c0 Q•
-p G
4) N - 1 d •.�
ca co y G ^4 NW c0 w N W 0 d H
•- -A O U d r co 0O ,jU >>. PU >H U •.c _4 H Hyy uv �+ N 14 �O
c0
W v v Cl) N eCi -o ti L N X I>+ N
ca
.'H1i1. UGi) 5¢HHA •aroi A �Nn ' 3N Id teW ••¢N�p c73 •.y-.-++ Gd .N,.c . h ""'1••.� G GN -N+i PU7 ^a-)'vE U
GN �Qa) d La � to G C a)
xia/ co p >
cd C43
) a• y d c0 m LcO r ' -
N 4Jy -4 —4 N 4-J tO 4j O Oi d U N + W N N N N aW .] cis N 4-1 � c0 i `4 -4 O 1J O
w . c c0te
' a 14 a. J
a) X .4 p
1 :N& > > �-4 v .- U C3.44 N Co 0U1
N L 7 7 � t� CD-.1 0 O -'d 4O ) •4
r+ CIDO OPN N >
y .4 O N O O -,1 c0 L .+ CO O .- N c'1 M. a NGina CD U
_U•GC.-ac
_
¢ ¢ ¢ �
c0 P 'U •D d w CDP U <0 .o U •t1 caw CO S .� .`l .-c E U co P U •O d
a
04
H a. IL V a.
t
a. a4 a au Cl. aa 14 a a. a v a.
c:a
Cl. a.
U -
P. aw a. a. a. a. a. cw X4 a4 aw a4 Cl. a. Cl. a. a v a. a.
a "
� as a, w w U a. a. V a.
U
a
J t; U U a4 as a4 a. a. U a. a. V w
U
•�' 04 U a. a. V u a.
U
O
co
\ a4
Cl a. 04
�d
•�o
cj v
rj
� d
0
4c, U U
" d
rt V V
d
vt
V U
n '
� V U
.4
--I
S o U U
w �
d
Cl) U V
I
cG _
(q -
p,Q .--i to d 'a •--c
y 41 ,J
• O N > d (-.acy
Cd
c Gcca bo ilii c0 -.a w vJ H t) c0 'O N vJ O C
ca y —4 H J CE U W •.c G GO c) Q) H 47
w .l: •-4 co c0 c a yJ c0 > N co 14 Q) N .-i a) c0 -.-1 at i+ c0
J-1 CL Cl �" J-J N .--4 m N a6 H > b0 d (n 1.J
OD .--1 a V N E H cn CIS Q) V G co 7 H co J-) O G
c0 c •.-I cQ cif «i O 41 r .tom a. O m .-� •.� -14 H .n O H G U O
H at .a JJ ...i J.J G �"' -.�-1 7 ct o C N > 'Hu 0 co > •`� -Ga oNi ?
I xi •• d d N •• c0 O a -4 O aJ CL mtn
V) N C cn +.J -A 1.J D y tJ .n G •4 (n H a) G
JJ G G 0) —� c0 a� cC H +� a .n cn co
-.H-1 •rHi N h Rt c0 OD to cn cn U V 0) cq > ca 'D .-� w H F. a 3 J.� .n
41 cit co t� C/ d }. }.. G d y N •r1 7 N .,1 -.-� .,..� G .0 r1 d 0) N d 3-� .-4 N
a c�. -4 _ -4 o o .+ v a a� Ec H u c oo .n .0 v� .c a cr, aEi n�-0 c.)
3 �-- � in En iq En vii a �>. -v N E C t>a G Gr .-� cGo v -� aHi > v r+ G >
L G cc Od G F. �+ 7 -0 l+
O 0 d O W t.Y.]i C. rO [z=. W cu N 'j N
ao m GA pl U V U
W,
^' C,
aaa a. aaa as n a
V
IJ
Li 0104 -F
a a
a
v
CL M P4
P4 a a a aOw
CL rL4 a a
U
`^ aPL a. rL
a a
coU
�en
OL a� OLa a
U
O
91.J c•l
a M a rL4a
U
CL
U
P4
0
c
0
,
•E o
Cd ,
wa
,
d,
Cl" U
La
a
�+N
r-, U
,
d
,
aG
n
by U
Eo
w'i v
d�
t
U
O
� U
,
a
C h
H ,v
sa
ao
w 0 4mE co
o a
ai cn W y
N sM.1 000 .,�� 0 -.-t W N O
31 w •v ai ami G H a W '-' sNi o (L) H F+ O
cq 14
> > U > 4J L1. 0 U) R v H
es a C O 3 H Ui
D! J LO7
.
V) O O1 y
+J b cao a n a
-V -4
4 O V) 5
w 41 4J m d Fn + ap cd N HO + N NC ,cd O O ,. 1 .J
rl O O . + -- q h O l Coh C • •
-.a a., cd of CO 4J E _t n r1 G CO .4 v .+ d O
•p + 3+ as c r1 J- _ dO
Aj O . 1
.—+ E� cd U
a y
O N C •r+ cd -r1 cd 0 0) --1 O G x
,-c ,J ►+ H o h 44 cc 41 cd �4 0 A n1 cd O U) W � ru Lu+ W .-I E N
s4 U N O E 0cq ,J 0 a.C: • 3 H •r1 . OCD . N V .G+ 0
Cd
a aw
cd 41 w 1.1 w O w cn y w '.4 N cn H � .-1 <"� U3 N x � d Q �
p Nca act _ A .
•• n� a > 3 N .n � U •�O d H N �s ¢ ca .o v 'n
SECTION 18.72
CONDITIONAL USE
18.72.010 - Purpose
18.72.020 - Pre-Application Conference
18.72.030 - Application Procedures
18.72.031 - Application Information.
18.72.040 - Authority and Planning Commission Action
18.72.041 - Findings
18.72.050 - General Criteria for Conditional Use
18.72.060 - Standard Dimensional Requirements for Conditional Use
18.72.070 - Effective Period for Conditional Use Approval
18.72.071 - Conditional Use Approval
18.72.080 - Modification
18.72.090 - Appeal
18.72.100 - Concurrent Application with Site Design Review
18.72.010 - Purpose
Each zoning district excludes certain types of uses which are not permitted
outright because of inherent characteristics which may have an adverse effect
on the immediate area or the larger community. However, under certain
circumstances, it may be appropriate in a particular area, because of social or
technical need, to permit these excluded uses , provided their potential adverse
effects can be mitigated.
It is the intent of this section to permit such uses where it is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan subject to procedures and criteria which are
intended to mitigate potentially negative impacts.
18.72.020 - Pre-Application Conference
In accordance with Section 18.84.030 (2) (b) , Pre-Application Conference , the
applicant is required to meet with the Planning Director or his designee(s)
for a pre-application conference prior to submitting an application for con-
ditional use.
18.72.030 - Application Procedure
An application for a conditional use shall be made by the owner of the property,
or his authorized agent, on a form prescribed by the Planning Director or his
designee(s) , and shall be submitted to the Planning Office by 5:00 p.m. on the
date prescribed by the Planning Director.
18.72.031 - Application Information
An application for conditional use shall include the following where applicable:
SM
Page 2
a. The applicant's and property owner's name , address and telephone
number.
b. A description of the land on which the proposed development is to
take place by address , lot block, tract, or similar description.
C. A site plan drawn to scale showing existing lot line dimensions,
the location of all structures, accessways, pedestrian ways, land-
scaped areas, service areas, fences, walls, and all parking,
maneuvering, loading, and refuse. areas. The site plan shall indicate
all vehicle and pedestrian access points and the direction of traffic
flow on the property as well as how utility service and drainage are
to be provided. The site plan shall show proposed modifications to
existing grades. The site plan shall also show the relationship of
the site to adjoining properties, streets, alleys, structures, public
utilities and.drainageways.
d. The exterior lighting plan, which may be shown on the site plan,
indicating the location, size , height, typical design, material, color
and method of illumination.
e.. Plans and elevations of structure(s) to scale indicating heights
of structure , entrances and exists of proposed structures, as well as
architectural drawings or sketches, including floor plans, in sufficient
detail to permit computation of yard requirements.
f. A landscape plan drawn to scale showing the location of existing
trees and vegetation proposed to be removed and to be retained on the
site ,' the location and design of landscaped areas, the varieties and
sizes of trees and plant materials to be planted on the site , other
pertinent landscape features; and irrigation systems required to main-
tain plant materials.
g. Data indicating square footage of site and structure , building
coverage , landscaped area, amount of parking provided, building
materials to be used with specifications as to type , color , and texture
of exterior surfaces of proposed structures.
h. Any additional information which may be required by the Planning
Director to properly evaluate the proposed site plan. Such additional
information may only be required where the need for it can be justified
on the basis of special and/or unforeseen circumstances. The Planning
Director may also waive any of the above requirements where he finds
that the information required by this section is unnecessary to properly
evaluate the proposal.
i. No plan sheet shall exceed dimensions of 24 inches by 36 inches.
Where necessary, an overall plan with subsequent detail sheets shall
be submitted.
j. An applicable fee.
18.72.040 - Authority
The Planning Commission or its designated Hearings Officer shall hold a public
hearing in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.84 .070 (b) and 18.84.100
Pago 3
for purposes of reviewing the proposed conditional use . Following the close of
fes- the public hearing, the Approval Authority shall approve , conditionally approve
or deny the conditional use proposal.
18.72.041 - Findings
In making its decision, the Approval Authority shall consider the require-
ments of this Ordinance and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other
applicable policies and standards as adopted by the City, and it shall specify
such considerations as findings in support of its decision in accordance aaith
Section 18.84.100(d) .
18.72.050 - General Criteria for Conditional Use
A conditional use permit shall be issued by the Approval Authority if it is
determined to conform to the following criteria:
a. The use requested would conform with maps, goals and policies of
the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and is listed as a conditional use in
the underlying zoning district.
b. The granting of the proposal would provide for the facility that is
consistent with the overall needs of the community.
C. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use
considering size , shape , location, topography, existence of improve-
ments and natural features.
d. The site and proposed development is timely, considering the
adequacy of transportation systems, public facilities and services
existing or planned for the area affected by the use.
e. The proposed use will not alter the character of the surrounding
area in a manner which substantially limits , impairs , or precludes the
use of surrounding properties for the primary uses listed in the under-
lying zoning district.
18.72.060 - Standard Dimensional Requirements for Conditional Use Types
A conditional use shall comply with the standards of the zone in which it
is located, or as otherwise provided in standards that follow. A conditional
use permit shall not grant variances to the regulations otherwise prescribed
by this Ordanance, unless such variance is applied for in same application.
Standard Requirements:
a. Schools
1. Applicable zones: Single family residential, multiple family
residential.
2. Minimum lot size : Elementary - 5 acres plus 1 acre per 100
pupils.
Junior & Senior High - 10 acres plus 1 acre
per 100 pupils.
3. Setbacks: Front and rear yards - 30 feet
Side yards - 2C feet
Page 4
4. Height limitation: In accordance with Section 18.12. 110.
5. Off-street parking requirements in accordance with Section
18.60. 120(3)(d-f) .
6. Loading and unloading school children as provided in Section
18.60. 130.
b. Religious Assembly and Accessory Uses:
1. Applicable zones: Single family residential, multiple family
residential, residential commerical and general commerical.
2. Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet.
3. Setbacks: Front yards - 25 feet
Side and rear yards - 20 feet
4. Maximum lot coverage : 407, structure only.
5. Minimum street frontage: 30 feet
6. Height limitations: In accordance with Section 18.12. 110.
7. Off-street parking required as set forth in Section 18.60.120(3)(b) .
8. Access and egress from street as set forth in Section 18.64.
C. Hospitals:
1. Applicable zones: Single and Multiple family residential and
commerical - residential, general, highway and
2. Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet. professional.
3. Setbacks: Front, side and rear yards - 25 feet.
4. Height limitation: In accordance with Section 18.12. 110.
5. Maximum lot coverage: 407, structure only.
6. There must be primary access to the hospital from major arterial
street.
7. Off-street parking required as set forth in Section 18.60.120(2)(b) .
8. Off-street loading berths are required in accordance with Section
18.60. 140.
d. Funeral and Interment Services (interring and cemeteries only):
1. Applicable zone: Single family residential and multiple family
residential.
2. Minimum lot size: 5 acres.
3. Setbacks: Front, side and rear yard - 15 feet, for graves only.
25 feet for any structure.
4. Height limitation: 35 feet.
5. Adequate irrigation must be provided approved by the City
Engineer.
6. Adequate fencing must be provided; located at least 2, feet
from any side yard or right-of-way, outside visual clearance areas ,
and at least four feet in height.
7. Off-street parking requirements: exempt.
e. Cultural Exhibit and Library Services:
1. Applicable zones: Single family residential and multiple family
residential.
2. Minimum lot size: see applicable zone.
3. Setbacks: see applicable z one .
4. Height limitation: In accordance with Section 18.12.110.
5. Off-street parking in accordance with Section 18.60.120(3)(c) .
f. Spectator Sports and Entertainment(Other):
1. Applicable zones: Single family residential, multiple family
residential, general commercial and highway commerical.
Page, 5
2. Minimum lot size: 2 acres.
3. Setbacks: Structures on site must meet requirements of
applicable zone .
4. Height limitations: In accordance with Section 18. 12.110.
5. Off-street parking requirements: Exempt, unless they are con-
structed in conjunction with another use , then parking shall
comply with the requirements of that other use.
g. Lodges , Fraternal and Civil Assembly:
1. Applicable zones: Multiple family residential and residential
commercial.
2. Minimum lot size: see applicable zone.
3. Setbacks: see applicable zone.
4. Height limitations: In accordance with Section 18.12.110.
5. Off-street parking: see Section 18.60.120(3)(b) .
h. Group Residential(Care):
1. Applicable zones: Single family residential and multiple family
residential.
2. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet.
3. Minimum setbacks: see applicable zone.
4. Height limitations: 35 feet.
5. Site design review in accordance with Section 18.59.
6. State certification in accordance with ORS 418.805 - 418.885.
7. Off-street parking in accordance with Section 18.60.120.
i. Major Impact Services and Utilities and Minor Impact Utilities:
1. Applicable zones: Single and multiple family residential;
commerical - residential, general, highway and
professional; and light industrial.
2. Minimum lot size: 5 ,000 square feet.
3. Setbacks: see applicable zone .
4. Height restrictions: In accordance with Section 18.12. 110.
5. Off-street parking and loading requirement: see Section 18.60
for applicable use.
6. Screening and site design review in accordance with Sections
18.12.080 & 18.59.
j. Heliports: Applicable zones: All commerical and industrial zones.
In accordance with the ODOT Aeronautics Division requirements and
the FAA recommended design guidelines.
k. Fuel Sales:
1. Applicable zones: Commerical - residential and general.
2. Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet
3. Setbacks: front yard - 40 feet
rear and side yards - none, except where the use abuts
a residential zone , then 15 feet with screening.
4. Fuel tank installation: In accordance with Section 18.12.120.
5. Height limitation: see applicable zone.
6. Off-street parking and loading requirement: see Section 18.60.
7. Landscaping and site design review in accordance with Sections
18.12.080 & 18.59.
Page 6
1. Parking Services:
1. Applicable zones: Multiple family residential and commerial - residential.
2. Minimum lot size: 5,000 square feet.
3. Minimum setbacks: for structures - see applicable zone .
for parking area - 5 feet.
around perimeter of paved area for landscaping
and screening purposes.
4. height limitations: see applicable zone.
C5. Off
-street parking requirements: see Section 18.60 for applicable
use.
6- Screening. and site design review in accordance with Sections
18.60.200 & 18.59.
M. Automobile and Equipment, Sales and Rental: equipment and repair - light
1. Applicable zone: general commercial.
2. Minimum lot size : see applicable zone.
3. Minimum setbacks: see applicable zone , and a 5-foot landscaping
strip between right-of-way line and auto display
area.
4'. Height. limitation: see applicable zone.
5:: Off-street parking and loading requirements: see Section 18.60 for
applicable use.
6. Screening and site design review in accordance with Sections 18.12.080
& 18.59..
n. Eating and Drinking Establishments
L. Applicable zone: Commerical - residential.
2. Minimum lot size: see applicable zone.
3. Minimum setbacks: see applicable zone.
4. He fight- limitations: see applicable zone.
Off-street parking and loading requirements: see Section 18.60 for
applicable use.
6 Site design review in accordance with Section 18.59.
o. Manufactured/Mobile Home Parks:
.1 Applicable zone: Single family residential( R-5 and R-7 only)
2. Minimum lot size: 5 acres.
3. Minimum setbacks for mobile home structures:
From public street - 20 feet
From other properties - l0 feet
Between mobile homes - 15 feet
From accessory structures - 10 feet
4. Units per acre: 6 units per acre maximum.
5. Lot. coverage: '50 percent of total lot area maximum (structures only).
6. Architectural. landscaping and certification requirements in
accordance with Section 18.20.130.
18.72'.0:70 - Effective Period for Conditional Use
The decision of the Planning Commission shall become effective in accordance
with Section 18.84 .240.
Page 7
18.72.071 - Conditional Use Approval
Conditional Use approval shall be effective for a one-year period from the date
of approval. In the event that the developer has not commenced the conditional
use or phases thereof, prior to the expiration of the established effective
period, all approvals are null and void. At its discretion and for a good
cause, the Approval Authority may extend the effective period.
18.72.080 - Modification
A request to modify an existing conditional use permit beyond 20% of the standards
prescribed in Section 18.72.060, (a. major modification) , shall be processed
through the variance procedure . Minor modifications of an existing conditional
use permit may be approved by the Planning Director. Written requests for a
minor modification shall include the following:
a. A site plan which shows any proposed modification.
b. A narrative which explains the applicant's justification for those
modif ications.
C. Any other information required by the Planning Director.
18.72.090 - Appeal
The decision of the Approval Authority may be appealed in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 18.84.250 - 18.84 .310 and Resolution 79-9 (appeal fees).
18.72.100 - Concurrent Application with Site Design Review
In accordance with Sections 18.59 and 18.84.060 of the Zoning Ordinance , the
applicant may apply for Site Design Review concurrent with any conditional use
application.
,'gyp
SECTION 18.17. - USE CLASSIFICATIONS
18.17.010 - General Intent of Use Classifications
18.17.020 - Listing of Use Classification
18.17.030 - Classification of Uses
18.17.040 - Classification of Combination of Principal Uses
18.17.010 - General Intent of Use Classifications
The provisions of Section 18.17 shall be known as the Use Classifications. The
purpose of these provisions is to classify uses into a limited number of use
types on the basis of common functional, product, or compatibility character-
istics, thereby providing a basis for the regulation of uses in accordance with
criteria which are directly relevant to the public interest.
18.17.020 - Listing of Use Classifications
All uses are hereby classified into the following use types:
(1) RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES
Residential use types include the occupancy of living accomodations on a
wholly or primarily nontransient basis.
a. Single detached
One dwelling unit, freestanding and structurally separated from other
dwelling units or buildings, located on a lot.
b. Duplex
Two dwelling units placed so that some structural parts are in common
and are located on a single lot or development site.
C. Single attached (zero lot line)
Two dwelling units attached side by side with some structural parts in
common at a common property line.
d. Attached
More than two dwelling units placed side by side with some structural
parts in common, at a common property line.
e. Multiple Dwelling
A structure containing at least three (3) dwelling units in any vertical
or horizontal arrangement, located on a lot or development site.
f. Group Residential
Refers to the residential occupancy of livingunits b
than 5 persons who are not related by blood, marriage,� groups
or adoption,
and where communal kitchen/dining facilities are provided. - Typical
uses include occupancy of fraternity and sorority houses, retirement
homes, boarding houses, cooperatives, halfway houses, and intermediate
care facilities but excluding group care facilities as specifiedin "g".
Group Residential(Care)
Refers to services provided in facilities authorized, certified,
or licensed by the State to provide board, room, and personal care
to seven or more physically disabled, mentally disordered, handicapped
persons, dependents or neglected children; or in facilities
authorized to provide supervisory or day care services(children's day
care of six or more children) to seven of more persons, but excluding
those uses classified under Major Impact Services and Utilities.
Typical uses include halfway houses, intermediate care facilities, day
care facilities of six children or more and schools for the mentally
retarded and physically handicapped.
g. Manufactured/Mobile Home
Refers to a structure transportable in one or more sections, each built on
a permanent chassis, and which is designed to be used for permanent oc-
cupancy as a residential dwelling.
-2-
(2) CIVIC USE TYPES
Refers to the performance of utility, educational, recreational, cultural, ,.
protective, governmental, and other uses which are strongly vested with
public or s-xi.al importance.
a. Administrative Services
Refers to consulting, record keeping, clerical, or public contact
services that deal directly with the citizen, together with incidental
storage and maintenance of necessary vehicles, and excludes commercial
use type, "Professional and Administrative Services." Typical use
. types are associated with governmental offices.
b. Community Recreation
Refers to recreational, social, or multi-purpose uses typically
associated with parks, playfie lds, golf courses, or community recreation
buildings.
C. Cultural Exhibits and Library Services
Refers to museum-like preservation and exhibition of objects in one
or more of the arts and sciences, gallery exhibition or works of art,
or library collection of books, manuscripts, etc. , for study and reading.
d. Essential Services
Refers to services which are necessary to support principal use type
development and involves only minor structures such as lines a.id poles,
phone booths, fire hydrants, as well as bus stops, benches, and mail-
boxes, which are necessary to support principal development.
e. Hospitals
Refers to an institution where the ill or injured may receive medical,
surgical or psychiatric treatment; and nursing, food and lodging
during their stay.
f. Lodge. Fraternal, and Civic Assembly
Refers to meetings and activities primarily conducted for their
members. Excluded from this use type are uses classified as group
residential, group care , and transient habitation (all types)_ Typical
uses include meeting places for civic clubs, lodges, or fraternal or
veteran organizations.
-3-
Ran
g. Major Impact Services and Utilities
Refers to services and utilities which have substantial impact. Such
uses may be permitted in any district when the public interest super-
cedes the usual limitations placed on land use and transcends the usual
restraints of the district for reasons of necessary location and community
wide interest. Typical places or uses are sanitary landfills, airports,
detention and correction institutions, mass transit waiting stations
or turnarounds, and includes spectator sports and entertainment with a
capacity for 300 or more such as large exhibition halls or sports
stadiums , and amusement parks; but excludes uses listed under "Amusement
Enterprises".
h. Minor Impact Utilities
Refers to public utilities which have a local impact on surrounding
properties and are necessary to provide essential services. Typical
uses are electrical and gas distribution substations, and radio,
microwave , telephone transmitters, and cable TV receivers and transmitters.
i. Parking Services
Refers to parking services involving garages and lots, and may exclude
required parking lots within the same lot of record of a particular
development.
j. Postal Services
Refers to mailing services and processing as traditionally operated
or leased by the United States Postal Service and includes United
Parcel Service facilities.
k. Public Safety Services
Refers to the providing of protection by a district or entity pursuant
to Fire, Life, and Safety Code Sections together with the incidental
storage and maintenance of necessary vehicles. Typical uses include
fire stations, police stations, ambulance services.
1. Religious Assembly
Refers to religious services involving public assembly such as customarily
occurs in synagogues, temples , and churches.
M. Sch ools
Refers to a public or parochial place or institution for teaching or
learning. Typical uses include nursery, elementary, junior and senior high
schools and related uses; excluding trade and business schools and colleges.
(3) COMMERCIAL USE TYPES
Commercial use types include the distribution and sale or rental of goods;
and the provision of services other than those classified as Civic Uses.
a. Agricultural Sales
Refers to sale from the premises of feed, grain, fertilizers, pesti-
cides, and similar goods. Typical uses include nurseries, hay, feed,
and grain stores.
-4-
b. Agricultural Services
Refers to establishments or places of business engaged in the provision
of agriculturally related services with incidental storage on lots
other than where the service is rendered. Typical uses include crop
dusting or tree service firms.
C. Amusement Enterprise
Refers to establishments or places primarily engaged in the provision
of entertainment of recreation which require less personal physical
activity than those uses included in indoor Participant Sports and
Recreation. Typical uses include billiard parlors, bowling alleys,
arcades and electronic game room facilities.
d Animal Sales and Services
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in
animal related sales and services. The following are animal sales and
services use types:
I. _Animal Sales and Services: Auctioning. Auctioning of livestock
on a wholesale or retail basis with incidental storage of animals
produced off property not exceeding a 48-hour period. Typical uses
include animal auctions or livestock auction yards.
2. _Animal Sales and Services: Grooming. Grooming of dogs, cats , and
similar small animals. Typical uses include dog bathing and clipping
salons or pet grooming shops.
3. Animal Sales and Services: Kennels. Kennel services for dogs, cats,
and similar small animals. Typical uses include boarding kennels
or dog training centers.
4. Animal Sales and Services: Veterinary (Large Animals). Veterinary
services for large animals. Typical uses include animal hospitals
(large animals) or veterinary hospitals (large animals).
5. Animal Sales and Services: Veterinary (Small Animals). Veterinary
services for small animals. Typical uses include pet clinics, dog
and cat hospitals, or animal hospitals (small animals).
e. Automotive and Equipment
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in
motorized vehicle-related sales or services. The following are auto-
motive and equipment use types:
1. Automotive and Equipment: Cleaning. Washing and polishing of auto-
mobiles.
uto-
mobiles. Typical uses include auto laundries or car washes.
2. Automotive and Equipment: Fleet Storage. Fleet storage of vehicles
used regularly in business operation and not available for sale or
long term storage of operating vehicles. Typical uses include taxi
fleets, mobile-catering truck storage , or auto storage garages.
3. Automotive and Equipment: Repairs, Heavy Equipment. Repair of
trucks, etc. , as well as the sale, installation, or servicing of
autoLiotive equipment and parts together with body repairs, painting,
OC -5-
and Steam cleaning. Typical uses include truck transmission shops ,
body shops, or motor freight maintenance groups.
4. Automotive and Equipment: Repairs, Light Equipment. Repair of
automobiles and the sale , installation, and servicing of automobile
equipment and parts but excluding body repairs and painting.
Typical uses include muffler shops, auto or motorcycle repair
garages, or auto glass shops.
5. Automotive and Equipment: Sales/Rentals , Farm Equipment. Sale ,
retail or wholesale, and/or rental from the premises of farm
equipment together with incidental maintenance. Typical uses
include farm equipment dealers.
6. Automotive and Equipment: Sales/Rentals, Heavy Equipment. Sale,
retail or wholesale, and/or rental from the premises of heavy
construction equipment, trucks, and aircraft together with incidental
maintenance. Typical uses include aircraft dealers, boat dealers,
heavy construction equipment dealers, or tractor trailers.
7. Automotive and Equipment: Sales/Rentals, Light Equipment. Sale,
retail or wholesale, and/or rental from the premises of autos,
noncommercial trucks, motorcycles, motorhomes, and trailers with less
than a 10,000 gross cargo weight together with incidental maintenance.
Typical uses include automobile dealers, car rental agencies, or
recreational vehicles sales and rental agencies.
g. Automotive and Equipment: Storage, Nonoperating Vehicles. Storage
of nonoperating motor vehicles. Typical uses include storage of
private parking towaways or impound yards.
9; Automotive and Equipment: Storage, Recreational Vehicles and Boats.
Storage of recreational vehicles and boats. Typical uses include the
collective storage of personal recreational vehicles or boats.
f. Building Maintenance Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of maintenance
and custodial services. , Typical uses
include janitorial, landscape maintenance, or window cleaning services.
g. Business Equipment Sales and Services
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in
the sale, rental, or repair of equipment and supplies used by office,
professional, and service establishments to the firms themselves rather
than to individuals, but excludes automotive, construction, and farm
equipment. Typical uses include office equipment and supply firms,
small business machine repair shops, or hotel equipment and supply
firms.
h. Business Support Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of services
of a clerical, employment, protective, or minor processing nature to
firms rather than individuals and where the storage of goods other
than samples is prohibited.' Typical uses include secretarial services,
telephone answering services, or blueprint services.
-6-
i. Communications Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of broad-
casting and other information relay services accomplished through the
use of electronic and telephonic mechanisms but excludes those classified
as Major Impact Services and Utilities. Typical uses include television
studios, telecommunication service centers, or telegraph service offices.
j. Construction Sales and Services
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in
construction activities and incidental storage on lots other than con-
struction sites as well as the retail or wholesale sale, from the premises,
of materials used in the construction of buildings or other structures
other than retail sale of paint, fixtures, and hardware; but excludes
those classified as one of the Automotive and Heavy Equipment use types.
Typical uses include building materials stores, tool and equipment rental
or sales, and building contracting/construction offices.
k. Convenience Sales and Personal Services
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the
provision of frequently or recurrently needed small personal items or
services. These include various general retail sales and personal
services of an appropriate size and scale to meet the above criteria.
Typical uses include neighborhood grocery, drug stores, laundromat/dry
cleaners, or barbershops.
1. Eating and Drinking Establishments
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the
sale of prepared food and beverages for on-premise consumption. Typical
uses include: fast order food establishments with and without drive-up
facilities and sit-down eating establishments, taverns, bars and lounges.
M. Explosive Storage
Refers to the storage of any quantity of explosives in accordance with
ORS 57.21. Typical uses include storage in the course of manufacturing,
selling, or transporting explosives or in the courEe of blasting operations.
-7-
n. Financial, Insurance-, and Real Estate Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of financial,
insurance, real estate, or securities brokerage services. Typical uses
include banks, insurance agencies, or real estate firms.
o. Food and Beverage Retail Sales
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the
retail sale of food and beverages for home consumption. Typical uses
include groceries or delicatessens, and excludes Eating and Drinking
Establishments.
p, Funeral and Interment Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of services
involving the care, preparation, or disposition of human dead. The
following are funeral and interment services use types:
1. Funeral and Interment Services: Cremating. Crematory services
involving the purification and reduction of the human body by fire.
Typical uses include crematories or crematoriums.
2. Funeral and Interment Services: Interring. Interring services
involving the keeping of human bodies other than in cemeteries.
Typical uses include columbariums or mausoleums.
3. Funeral and Interment Services: Undertaking. Undertaking services
such as preparing the dead for burial and arranging and managing
funerals. Typical uses include funeral homes or mortuaries.
4. Funeral and Interment Services: Cemeteries.
q. Fuel Sales
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in the
retail sale, from the premises, of petroleum products with incidental
sale of tires, batteries, and replacement items, lubricating services,
and minor repair services. Typical uses include automobile service
stations, filling stations, or truck stops.
r. Laundry Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of laundering,
dry cleaning, or dyeing services other than those classified as Personal
Services, General. Typical uses include laundry agencies, diaper services,
or linen supply services.
s. Medical and Dental Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of personal
health services -ranging from prevention, diagnosis and treatment, or
rehabilitation services provided by physicians, dentists, nurses, and
other health personnel as well as the provision of medical testing and
analysis services, but excludes those classified as any civic use or
group residential/(group care) use type. Typical uses include medical
offices, dental offices and laboratories, or health maintenance organi-
zations.
1
Y
-o O-
t. Participant Sports and Recreation
Refers to establishments or places primarily engaged in the provision
of sports or recreation by and for participants. Any spectators would
be incidental and on a nonrecurring basis. The following are partici-
pant sports and recreation use types:
1. Participant Sports and Recreation: Indoor. Those uses conducted
within an enclosed building. Typical uses include: indoor tennis courts,
racketball courts,swimming pools, or physical fitness centers.
2. Participant Sports and Recreation: Outdoor. Those uses conducted
in open facilities. Typical uses include driving ranges, miniature
golf courses, or swimming pools.
U. Personal Services, General
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of informa-
tional, instructional, personal improvement, and similar services of
a nonprofessional nature but excludes services classified as Spectator
Sports and Entertainment, Participant Sports and Recreation, or Transient
Habitation. Typical uses include photography studios, driving schools
and trade schools or reducing salons.
V. Professional and Administrative Services
Refers to offices of private firms or organizations which are primarily
} used for therovision of
p professional, executive, management, or .
administrative offices, legal offices, or architectural firms.
W. Repair Services, Consumer
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of repair
services to individuals and households rather than firms, but excluding
Automotive and Equipment use types. Typical uses include appliance
repair shops, apparel repair firms, musical instrument repair firms
gnd shoe repair shops.
X. Research Services
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in research of an industrial
or scientific nature which is generally provided as a service or which
is conducted by and for a private firm, but excludes medical testing
and analysis, and product testing. Typical uses include electronics
research laboratories, environmental research and development firms,
or pharmaceutical research labs.
y. Retail Sales, General
Refers to the sale or rental of commonly used goods, and merchandise
for personal or household use, but excludes those classified as Agricul-
tural Sales, Animal Sales and Services, Automotive and Equipment, Business
Equipment Sales and Services, Construction Sales and Services, Food and
Beverage Retail Sales, Gasoline Sales, and Swap Meets. Typical uses
include department stores, apparel stores, or funiture stores.
-9-
Z. Scrap Operations
Refers to places of business primarily engaged in the storage, sale,
dismantling, or other processing of used, source separated, or waste -
materials which are not intended for reuse in their original form.
Typical uses include automotive wrecking yard, junk yards, paper salvage
yards, or recycling facilities.
aa. Spectator Sports and Entertainment
Refers to establishments or places primarily engaged in the provision
of cultural, entertainment, athletic, and other events to spectators as
well as those involving social or fraternal gatherings. The following
are spectator sports and entertainment use types:
1. Spectator Sports and Entertainment: Limited. Those uses conducted
within an enclosed building with a capacity of 299 or less people.
Typical uses include small theaters or meeting halls.
2. S]2ectator Sports and Entertainment: Other. Designated as a Major
Impact Facility and Service use type, or in conjunction with school
facilities.
bb. Swap Meets
Refers to the display, exchange, barter, or sale of new or used common
household items or office equipment and furnishings, provided that such
activity being carried on is not a temporary use. Typical uses include
flea markets where clothing, personal effects, household furnishings,
and household appliances are sold or otherwise exchanged.
cc. Transient Habitation
Refers to establishments primarily engaged in the provision of lodging
services on a temporary basis with incidental food, drink, and other
sales and services intended for the convenience of guests. Typical uses
include hotels motels _or transient boarding houses.
dd. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution
Refers to establishments or places of business primarily engaged in
wholesaling, storage, distribution, and handling of materials and
equipment other than live animals and plants. The following are whole-
saling, storage, and distribution use types:
1. Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution: Mini-Warehouses. Storage
or warehousing service within a building(s) primarily for individuals
to store personal effects and by businesses to store materials for
operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise located elsewhere.
-10-
Incidental uses in a mini-warehouse may include the repair and main-
tenance of stored materials by the tenant but in no case may storage
spaces in a mini-warehouse facility function as an independent
retail, wholesale, business, or service use. Spaces shall not be
used for workshops, hobbyshops, manufacturing, or similar uses
and human occupancy of said spaces shall be limited to that required
to transport, arrange, and maintain stored materials.
2. Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution. Light. Wholesaling, storage,
and warehousing services within enclosed structures. Typical uses
include wholesale distributors, storage warehouses, or moving and
storage firms.
3. Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution: Heavy. Open-air storage,
distribution, and handling of materials and equipment. Typical
uses include monument or stone yards, or grain elevators.
(4) INDUSTRIAL USE TYPES
Industrial use types include the on-site production of goods by methods
not commercial, agricultural, or extractive in nature.
a. Light Industrial
Refers to the:
1. Production, processing, assembling, packaging, or treatment of food
products from previously processed materials; or
2. Production, processing, assembling, and packaging of finished products
from previously prepared materials; or
3. Manufacturing and assembly of electronic instruments and equipment
and electrical devices.
b. Heavy Industrial
Refers to the manufacturing, processing, or assembling of semi-finished
or finished products from raw materials.
(S) AGRICULTURAL USE TYPES
Agricultural use types include the on-site production of plant and animal
products by agricultural methods.
a. Animal Waste Processing
Refers to the processing of animal waste and by-products, including, but
not limited to, animal manure, animal bedding waste, and similar by-
products of an animal raising agricultural operation, for use as a
commercial fertilizer or soil amendment and including composting for
commercial purposes.
b. Aquaculture
Refers to the premises primarily devoted to aquacultural research and
specialties.
-11-
c. Horticulture
Refers to premises primarily devoted to horticultural and floracultural
specialties such as flowers, shrubs, and trees intended for ornamental
or landscaping purposes. The following are horticulture use types:
1. Horticulture: Cultivation. Cultivation of plants.
2. Horticulture: Storage. Storage of plants, primarily in containers.
d. Packing and Processing
Refers to packing or processing of agricultural crops, animals, and
their by-products which entails more than picking, cutting, sorting,
and boxing or rating but does not include canning, rendering, tanning,
or reduction of meat. The following are packing and processing use
types:
1. Packing and Processing: Limited. Packing nor processing of crops
grown on the premises.
2. Packing and Processing: General. Packing or processing of crops,
animals, or their by-products regardless of where they were grown.
e. Row and Field Crops
Refers to premises primarily devoted to the cultivation of agricultural
products grown in regular or scattered patterns such as vines, field,
forage, and other plant crops intended to provide food or fibers.
18.17.030 - Classification of Uses
Uses will be classified into use types based upon the description of the use
types and upon common functional, product, or compatibility characteristics
with other uses already classified within the use type. A list of common uses
and the use types into which they are classified shall be maintained by the Plan-
ning Director. The Planning Director shall have the authority to classify common
uses according to use type. The classification of a use is subject to the right
of appeal in accordance with the provision of Section 184.84.150.
18.17.040 - Classification of Combination of Principal Uses
The following rules shall apply where a lot contains uses which resemble two or
more different use types and which are not classified either special development
or as accessory uses:
a. Separate Classification of Several Establishments. The principal uses
conducted on a lot or development site by two or more individual estab-
lishments, managements, or institutions shall be classified separately
into use types.
b. Classification of Different Uses Conducted .by Individual Establishment.
If principal uses conducted on a lot or development site by an individual
establishment, management, or institution resemble two or more different
use types all such principal uses shall be classified in the use types
whose description most closely portrays the nature of such uses.
-12-
CHAPTER 18.20
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
R-30, R-20, R-10, R-7, R-5
Section 18.20.010 - Permitted Uses
1'
(1) Residential Use Types
- Single detached
(2) Civic Use Types
- Essential services, in accordance with Section 18.59
(3) Accessory Uses
- Home occupations, in accordance with Section 18.25.250
Section 18.20.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Administrative services
- Community recreation
- Cultural exhibits and library services
- Duplex, 10,000 square foot lot minimum
- Funeral and interment services (Interring and Cemeteries)
Group residential (Care)
Hospitals
- Major impact utilities and services
- Manufactured/Mobile Homes(R-7 and R-5 only, in accordance with
Section 18.20.130)
- Minor impact utilities
- Public safety services
- Religious assembly
- Schools
- Single attached (zero lot line)
- Spectator sports and entertainment, other (in conjunction with school
use only)
CHAPTER 18.24
MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONES
A-12, A-20, A-40
Section 18.24.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Residential Use Types
- Attached
- Duplex
- Group residential
- Group residential (Care)
- Manufactured Mobile Home, in accordance with 18.20.130
- Multiple dwelling
(2) Civic Use Types
- Essential services
(3) Accessory uses
.-. Home occupations, in accordance with Section 18.25.250.
Section 18.24.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84. )
- Administrative services
- Community recreation
- Cultural exhibits and library service
- Funeral and interment services (Interring and Cemeteries)
- Hospitals
- Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
- Parking services
- Public safety services
- Religious assembly
- Schools
- Spectator sports and entertainment, other (in conjunction with school
use only)
CHAPTER 18.25
SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING
MULTIPLE FAMILY - A-70/80
Section 18.25.020 - Permitted Uses
(1) Residential Use Types
- Attached
- Group residential
- Croup residential (Care)
- Multiple family
(2) Civic Use Types
- Essential Services
(3) Commercial Use Types
- Convenient sales and personal services*
- Food and beverage retail sales*
- Medical and dental services*
*These retail and service facilities shall be located within the housing complex.
Section 18.25.025 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Hospitals
- Minor impact utilities
CHAPTERS 18.28 & 18.30
GENERAL COI.24ERCIAL
C-3, C-314
Section 18.28.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
- Administrative services
- Cultural exhibits and library services
- Essential services
- Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly
- Parking services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
- Amusement enterprises
- Animal sales and services
a. grooming
b. veterinary (small animals)
- Automotive and equipment
a. cleaning
- Business support services
- Convenient sales and personal services
- Eating and drinking establishments
- Financial, insurance and real estate services
- Food and beverage retail sales
Funeral and interment services, cremating & undertaking
- Medical and dental services
Participation sports and recreation
a. indoor
Personal services, general
- Professional and administrative services
- Repair services, consumer
- Retail sales, general
- Spectator sports and entertainment
a. limited
- Transient habitation
Section 18.28.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Automotive and equipment
a. repairs, light equipment
b. sales/rental, light equipment
- Fuel sales
- Heliports
- Hospitals
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
- Religious -assembly
- Spectator sports and recreation
a. other
CHAPTER 18.32
RESIDENTIAL COI�a",ERCIAL
C-4
Section 18.32.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
- Administrative services
- Cultural exhibits and library services
- Essential services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
- Convenience sales and personal services
- Financial, insurance and real estate services
- Food and beverage retail sales
- Medical and dental services
- Participant sports and recreation
a. indoor
- Professional and administrative services
- Repair services, consumer
Section 18.32.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Eating and drinking establishments
- Fuel sales
- Hospitals
- Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
- Parking services
- Religious assembly and accessory uses
- Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (ODOT) and
the FAA
CHAPTER 18.36
HIGHWAY CO2�nMRCIAL
C-5
Section 18.36.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
- Administrative services
- Cultural exhibits and library services
- Essential services
- lodges, fraternal, and civic assembly
- Parking services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
- Agricultural sales
- Amusement enterprise
- Animal sales and services
a. grooming
b. kennels
c. veterinary, large and small animals
= Automotive and Equipment
a'. cleaning
b. fleet storage
C. repairing, light equipment
d. sales/rental: farm equipment
e. sales/rental: heavy equipment
f. sales/rental: light equipment
g. storage: recreational vehicles and boats
- Building maintenance services
- Business equipment sales and services
- Business support services
- Communication services
`r - Construction sales and service
- Convenient sales and personal services
- Eating and drinking establishments
- Financial, insurance, and real estate services
- Food and beverage sales
- Fuel sales
- Funeral and interment services
a. undertaking
b. cremating
- Laundry services
- Medical and dental services
- Participant sports and recreation
a. indoor
b. outdoor
- Personal services, general
- Professional and administrative services
- Repair services, consumer
- Retail sales, general
- Spectator sports and entertainment
a. limited
- Swap meets
- Transient habitation
- Wholesaling, storage and distribution
a. mini-warehouses
Section 18.36.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
- Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (ODOT) and
the FAA
- Hospitals
- Specta4or sports and recreation
a. other
CHAPTER 18.40
COIO ERCIAL - PROFESSIONAL ZONE
C-P
Section 18.40.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
- Administrative services
- Cultural exhibits and library services
- Essential services
- Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly
Parking services
Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
Animal sales and services
a. grooming
b. veterinary, small animals
Building maintenance services
- Business equipment sales and services
- Business support services
- Communication services
- Convenient sales and personal service (not to exceed 10% of the
total square footage within the office complex)
- Eating and drinking establishments (not to exceed 10% of total
square footage within_ the office complex)
- Financial, insurance and real estate services
- Medical and dental services
- Participation sports and recreation
a. indoor
b. outdoor
(not to exceed 10% of the total square footage within the office
complex)
- Personal services, general
- Professional and administrative service
Research services
Section 18.40.020 - Conditional. Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Heliports
- Hospitals
- Major impact utilities
- Minor impact utilities
l
6
CHAPTER 18.44
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
M-2
Section 18.44.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
- Essential Services
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
- Parking services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
- Agricultural sales
- Agricultural services
- Animal sales and service
a. auctioning
b. kennels
C. vat-r;rjry (large and small animals)
- Automotive and equipment
a. cleaning
b. fleet storage
c. repairs, heavy and light equipment ht equipment
d. sales and rental, farm heavy and lig
e. storage,non-operating vehicles
- Construction sales and service
- Explosive storage
- Fuel sales
- Laundry services
- Research services
- Scrap operations
- Wholesale, storage and distribution
a. mini-warehousing
b- light
c. heavy
(3) _Industrial Ilse Types
- Light industrial
a. food products
b. finished products
C. electronic equipment
- Heavy industrial
(4) Agricultural Use Types
- Animal waste processing
- Aquaculture
- Horticulture
a. cultivation
b. storage
- Packing and processing
a. limited
b. general
Section 18.44.020 - Conditional Use (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
Y-
- Heliports
CHAPTER 18.48
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE
M-3
Section 18.48.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
- Essential services
- Parking services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use types
Agricultural sales
- Agricultural services
- Animal sales and service
a. auctioning
b. kennels
c. veterinary (large and small animals)
- Automobile and equipment
a. cleaning
b. fleet storage
c. repairs, heavy and light
d. sales and rental, heavy and light farm equipment
e. storage, non-operating vehicles and recreational vehicles and boats
- Building maintenance services
- Construction sales and service
- Laundry services
- Research services
Fuel sales
Wholesaling, storage, and distribution
a. mini-warehouse
b. light
(3) Industrial Use Type
- Light industrial a, food products b.Finished Products c. Electronic Equip.
RIM
(4) Agricultural Use Type
- Aquaculture
- Horticulture,storage and cultivation
- Packing and processing, limited
Section 18.48.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18.72 & 18.84)
- Heliports
- major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
r CHAPTER 18.52
INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE
M-!
Section 18.52.010 - Permitted Uses
(1) Civic Use Types
7. Essential Services
- Parking services
- Postal services
- Public safety services
(2) Commercial Use Types
- Agricultural sales
- Agricultural services
- Animal sales and service
a. auctioning
b. kennels
c.. veterinary (large & small animals)
t
Automobile and equipment
a. cleaning
b. fleet storage
C. repairs, heavy and light
d. sales and rental: heavy equipment, farm equipment, light equipment
e. storage: nonoper.ating and recreational vehicles and boats
- Building mainten,ince services
- Busin .ss equipment sales and services
- Business support services
Communication services
- Construction sales and services
- Convenience sales and personal service (not to exceed 10% of the
total square footage within the primary use)
- Laundry services
- Research services
- Fuel sales
_ Wholesale, storage and distribution
a. mini-warehouse
b. light
- Eating and drinking establishments (not to exceed 107 of the total
square footage within the primary use)
Participation sports and recreation
a. indoor primary
b. outdoor uare footage within the p y
(not to exceed 10% of the total sq
use)
Professional and administrative services
(3) Industrial Use Type
- Light industrial a. Food Products b. Finished Products
c. Electronic Equipment
(4) Agricultural Use Types
- Aquaculture
- Horticulture, storage and cultivation
_,Packaging
& processing: Limited
Section 18.52.020 - Conditional Uses (see Sections 18-72 & 18.84)
Heliports
- Major impact services and utilities
- Minor impact utilities
7—fit c� o �r•
May 20, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Finance Director/City Recorder , Doris Hartig �
Subject: Preliminary Election Results
The City has received preliminary election results from the May 18th election.
Official results will follow.
. BALLOT MEASURES YES NO
Loaves & Fishes Levy 2,235 1,050
Charter Revisions
Council M mber Increase 1,230 1,836
Council Vacancies 1,611 1,169
Roll of Council President 1,979 863
Municipal Judge 1,782 979
Election Process 1,826 894
Special Election 1,940 780
Tort Issue 1,837 702
Council Meetings 1,607 1,077
TCYS Levy 1,605 1,594
F
AL NOTE: 5-20-82 - Afternoonoffice has been in contact with the County Elections Department and TCYS.
this date the TCYS Levy has passed by 1 vote. The Elections Department
complete the final count by Monday afternoon (5-24-82). If the vote is
that close , a count by hand may be necessary. This would not be completed ,
however , for another 10 days. The deadline for filing ballot measures for
the June 29th election is Wednesday, May 26th. Bill Knudsen , TCYS Director ,
will be appearing before you Monday evening to request Council adopt another
resolution calling for the 6-29 election which will be filed with the County
Wednesday. This measure could be pulled later from the ballot for the 29th
if the May election is determined to have been successful.
N Ol �p
-4 -4 N
1 t�hh
v!
co to OD
O
' :J•TI
LL cd `�
H
: b
P4 co
U 11y 1
H z A: u +co c0 U 0 Ppq
cc P4
1-4
CO
a H F-i ca Pa cis r-4
W O U P+ z U E Ria =
oP; a c Co ,>1 CD l lL" o ¢ � :n
I t O 6 W N
`ri�Yi 1� x W A r: U n W 3 n x P� A ^ J
N
ON
ca U �D M p H �
7-� rl N � H 4.jcV a)
N .i P+ -7 x
14 O co O W
W 'J y>>i
Li} x 4) z r+ z w
P+ x v
�± �4
+� 0
cu
< • -D
O a C) �, Cl) o
M L+ �"f 1."i
=1rl _ cz H n U O 3
"%... � A nU CO
,- 01%-' H U N Z N r7 W ( 0
(_�(j <C 2 cn c.. O H Z O O � v
W . I p Ov >4 U E-4
C v R.
Pa;2i, . E: F-4 C�
1 W U 1
44
Q) Pa v O
H > W W
•K -n O iC ON cn w -14U O N I
Ic it W i Ic
•K •K c� •K iC qb L
ra x cn
H rt in H H OCO x 0
\ N N
" W
U U
z z a) ca
®
H a U CC) U •U
cd .
C> L4 w v a � �'' $4 r-°1i
O OO .a OM O H M O
M 3
Z W ^ O W tt
�O chK K
O n
:3
VJ
Tigard Public Schools,District 23i
Administration Office
13137S.W. Pacific Hwy.
Tigard,Oregon 97223
Area Code(503)620-1620
May 13 , 1982
Mr. Wilbur Bishop, Mayor
City of Tigard
12420 S. W. Main
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Wilbur:
The Tigard School District Board of Directors was informed
of your role in facilitating the Walnut Street improvement
project from 106th Street to 122nd Street and asked me
to express their sincere appreciation for your assistance
and leadership. We believe the improvement of Walnut STreet
is critical for the safety of students and your support
for the cooperative City of Tigard/Washington County of
great importance.
Please let us know if we can be of help to support this
project.
Thanks again for your enthusiastic help.
Sincerely,
T D OL DI�RZCT 23J
�G
Deb Fen 11 , Superintendent
rb
T-
�- 1
May 19 , 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and Council n/,i
From: Bob Jean, City Administrator IV
Subject: Leron Heights Litigation
Staff received a call from Joe Bailey today regarding the Paterson Case .
Last Monday Joe reported that the trial in this matter was set for
September 22, 1982. He has been able to get this rescheduled for June 11, 1982.
Staff will keep you updated as we receive further reports from Joe Bailey.
lw
LANDIS. AEBI & BAILEY, P. C.
LAWYERS
:S16 GEORGIA-PACIFIC BUILDING
PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-1276
TELEPHONE(5031224-6532
DAVID C.LANDIS
FRED M. AEBI
JOE D.BAILEY / r Z
JOHN C. MERCER MAY
JAMES M.CALLAHAN L
ANNA M. MORAN
DAVID R_FOSTER
VICKI HORMAN YATES May 19, 1982
Mr. Robert Jean
City Administrator
City of Tigard
P. O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: City of Tigard v. Paterson, et al
Our File: 12 , 836-41
Dear Bob:
At the May 17, 1982 City Council meeting, I expressed
my disappointment at the September 22 trial date we had been
given for this case. I did not go into a lot of detail on that
occasion, but I called Judge Bonebrake personally and asked him
to give us a date, and I had the impression that the September 22
date was what he had done for us. I would be very hesitant to
complain about that, because I know that he would try to do his
best for us, and so on that night I was assuming that he had done
his best and that was all he could do.
I have now received in the mail a notice changing the
trial date to June 11. Obviously what happened was that in the
ordinary course of things, the case got set for September 22 ,
and then when he got around to taking care of our personal request
made directly to him, he was indeed able to do much better. It
is now scheduled for June 11, and I have alerted the witnesses
who will testify for us to that new date. I think Loreen is
going to write a note to the City Council to inform them of the
change too.
Very truly yos,
Joe D. Bailey /
JDB/ls
cc: Edward J. Sullivan, Esq.
- v O V.
May 20, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council /
From: Finance Director/City Recorder , Doris Hartig �
Subject: Preliminary Election Results
The City has received preliminary election results from the May 18th election.
Official results will follow.
BALLOT MEASURES YES NO
Loaves & Fishes Levy 2,235 1,050
Charter Revisions
Council Member Increase 1,230 1,836
Council Vacancies 1,611 1,169
Roll of Council President 1,979 863
Municipal Judge 1,782 979
Election Process 1,826 894
Special Election 1,940 780
Tort Issue 1 ,837 702
Council Meetings 1,607 1 ,077
TCYS Levy 1,605 1 ,594
SPECIAL NOTE: 5-20-82 - Afternoon -
This office has been in contact with the County Elections Department and TCYS.
As of this date the TCYS Levy has passed by 1 vote . The Elections Department
will complete the final count by Monday afternoon (5-24-82). If the vote is
still that close , a count by hand may be necessary. This would not be completed ,
however , for another 10 days. The deadline for filing ballot measures for
the June 29th election is Wednesday, May 26th. Bill Knudsen , TCYS Director ,
will be appearing before you Monday evening to request Council adopt another
resolution calling for the 6-29 election which will be filed with the County
Wednesday. This measure could be pulled later from the ballot for the 29th
if the May election is determined to have been successful.
Oregon Liquor Control Commission
VICTOR ATIVEH
aOVEiwoe� P.O. BOX 22297, 9079 S.E. McLOUGHLIN BLVD., PORTLAND, OREGON 97222
may 13, 1982 nECENED
`.,Jp,Y 1 u 1982
marion J. Powers CITy OF TIGARD
11660 Sw Pacific Hwy-
Tigard, OR 97223
License Refusal--SR B licenses for May 152 2.2 and 29, 1982
CEHTIF IED RAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tigard bowl
11660 Sw Pacific HWY.
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear +-is. Powers:
Your application for Special Retail Beer (SRB) licenses at the
aUove location were considered by the License Division of the
Oregon - Liquor Control Commission. The License Division' s rec-
ommendation is that your application be refused. The Com-is-
sion proposes to act upon the recommendation.
The License Division's recommendation is eased upon the follofl-
ing:
ORS 471.295(1). The granting of a license in the locality
set out in the application is not demanded by public in-
terest or convenience.
1 UAR Chapter 845-04-025(5)(x). The qualifications for a
special license are as follows: Except for Special Uls-
penser and Special Events winery licenses, the purpose For
which the license is to be used mrsst be a picnic, conven-
tion, fair, civic or community enterprise, or similar
special event, such as a spectator sports event , musical
concert or festival. It is the ;relief of the License Div-
ision that _your application does not qualify under this
criteria. Mather, it is the belief of the License Div-
ision that the events for which these licenses are applied
to be held in conjunction with are a regular feature of
the business and they also appear to be for a strictly
commercial purpose.
1
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Tigard dowl
tray 13, 1982
Page 2
You are entitled to a hearing on the merits of your application
and the License Division' s recommendation. The Commission is
not hound by the recommendation. If you wish a hearing to con—
test the recommendations you crust notify the License Division
In writing within sixty (60) days of the date of this notice.
If you do not request a hearing, thv Commission will decide 1
upon the merits of your application at its July, 1982 meeting-
Yours truly,
Alan G. Rogers
Director
License Division
AGR:SS: kw/1959b
cc : City of Tigard
I
I