Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/23/1981 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 23, 1981, 7:30 P.m. UIJLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LECTURE ROOti NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEMI MUST SIGHT THEIR NAME ON THE APPROPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) LOCATED AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE CALLED FORWARD BY THF CHAIR TO SPEAK ON THN; INDICATED ITEM(S) . AGENDA: I. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: (All matters under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted in one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired by any Council member or member of the audience, that item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered separately.) (a) Approval of Minutes: March 9 & 16, 1981 (b) Approval of Expenditures and Investments: $ 82,787.1.2 (c) Monthly Reports - Receive and File. Building Library Finance Planning (d) RESOLUTION No. 81-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TRANSFERRING FUNDS FOR UNFORSEEN EXPENSES. ($1,000 unemployment) Ratifying Council action of 3/16/81 (e) Accept and authorize Mayor and City Recorder to execute. Agreement between City of Tigard and Oregon Electric Railroad for 10 year right-of-way use for sewer line installed for 74th Avenue LID 6. APPROVAL OF OLCC APPLICATIONS American Legion Post #158 - 11578 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard - DBA Application DeCicco's Old Country Pizza - 12122 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard - RbIB App;_ication Casa Pinata - 11290 SW Bull Mtn. Rd. , Tigard - DC Application (a) Recommendation of Chief of Police. 7. ORDIP?ANCE No. 81- AN ORDIFANCE CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO VOTERS TAX LEVY FOR TIGARD LOAVES AND FISHES SENIOR. CENTER. ($10,000) (a) Request by Loaves & Fishes. 8. APPROVE LOAVES AND FISHES LEASE AGREF14ENIT - Senior Center (a) Recommendation of City Administrator. 9. PROCLA14ATION - Building Safety Week - April 5-11 , 1981. (a) Presentation by Mayor. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:00 P.M. 10. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION 7.CA 3-81 (Valenzuela) NPO #6 A request by M. Valenzuela for a zone change from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" and annexation to the City of Tigard located at 944.5 SW Mountain View Lane, Washington County Tax Map 2S1 11BA, Tax Lot 11.00. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Summation by Planning Director (c) Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Cross Examination (d) Recommendation of Planning Director (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Consideration by Council (g) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING ANNEXATION OF LANDS BY THE BOUNDARY COMMISSION, ORDER No. 1606, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN A14ENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD TO CONFORM WITH THE NPO #6 PLAN AS ADOPTED AND DECLARING AN E14ERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Short Title-Valenzuela) 11. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 4-81 (Hall Blvd. Baptist Church) NPO #6 A request by Hall Boulevard Baptist Church for a zone change from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-5 "Single Family Residential" and annexation to the City of Tigard located at 14245 SW Hall Boulevard Washington County Tax Map 2S1 11BA, Tax Lot 400. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Summation by Planning Director (c) Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Cross Examination (d) Recommendation of Planning Director (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Consideration by Council (g) ORDINANCE. No. 81- AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING AN14EXATION OF LANDS BY THE BOUNDARY REVIEW COMMISSION, ORDER No. 1607, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD TO CONFORM WITH THE NPO #6 PLAN AS ADOPTED AND DECLARING AN EMEREGNCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE. DATE.. (Short Title-Hall Blvd. Baptist Church) 12. VACATION REQUEST OF A CERTAIN PORTION OF KNEELAND ESTATES I SUBDIVISION. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Summation by Planning Director (c) Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Cross Examination. PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 1981 (d) Recommendation of Planning Director (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Consideration by Council (g) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A CERTAIN PORTION OF KNEELAND ESTATES I PLAT OF RECORD, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. 13. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION CPR 1-81 (Willow Brook/Canterbury Heights - Density Change in the Comprehensive Plan) NPO i#6 A request by Gramco Development Company for a Comprehensive Plan Review from, density of two units per acre to twelve and twenty units per acre (A2 to Al2 and A20 Multi-Family Residential) located at various properties abutting Pacific Highway, SW Naeve Road and SW 109th Avenue (Wash Co. Tax ?Bap 2S1 IOA, Tax Lots 4200, 4390, 4402, 4500, 4600 and Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax. Lots 500 & 600) . (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Summation by Planning Director (c) Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Cross Examination (d) Recommendation of Planning Director (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Consideration by Council (g) ORDINANCE No. 81- Ali ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING IB-4P OF THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (CPR 1-81 Willow brook/Canterbury Heights Density Change) . 14 . SW 72ND AVENUE AREA LID No. 21 A public hearing held by the Tigard City Council to only consider new evidence in the proposed 72nd Avenue Area LID No. 21 proposal. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Summation by Director of Public Works (c) Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Cross Examination (d) Recommendation of Director of Public Works (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Consideration by Council (g) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JANAUARY 12, 1981, WITH RESPECT TO SW 72ND AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT; APPROVING, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTIOP: OF STREET IMPROVE?BENTS; DECLARING RESULTS OF HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; DIRECTING SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARINGS -;t —5. ZONE CHANGE ZC 1-81 (Cash 's Realty B2 & RU-4 to CP Zone Change) NPO #4 A request by Cash's Realty for a Zone Change from Washington County B2 and RU-4 to City of Tigard CP "Commercial Professional" taking in the whole block surrounded by Franklin Street, 66th Avenue, Gonzage Street-, and 67th Avenue (Washington Co Tax Map 2S1 IAA, Tax Lots 6700, 6800, 6900, 7000, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7301). PAGE 3 — COUNCIL AGENDA — MARCH 23, 1981 (a) Recommendation of Planning Commission (b) Consideration by Council (c) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE. ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING 14AP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE: DATE. (Cash 's Realty) 16. ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZCPD 2-81 and CONDITIONAL USE: CU 1-81 (Dawn's Inlet R-7 to R-7PD and Single Family Attached in an R-7 zone) NPO #7 A request by Jon Davis for a Preliminary Plan Review for a 'Zone Change from City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" to City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential Planned Unit Development" zone to build single family hooves and a Conditional Use request for a single family attached home on one lot located at 11885 SW 11.3th Place (Wash. Co. Tax Mpa 1S1 34DC, Tax Lot 3500) . (a) Recommendation of Planning Commission (b) Consideration by Council (c) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING 14AP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Dawn's Inlet) PUBLIC HEARING 17. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 9-80 A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18.59 of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to Design Review. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Summation by Planning Director (c) Public Testimony Proponents Opponents Cross Examination (d) Recommendation of Planning Director (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) Consideration by Council (g) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13.59 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO DESIGN REVIEW AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 18. LCDC DENSITY REVIEW (a) Request of Council from March 16, 1981 meeting. 19. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING AN ANNEXATION PETITION BE FORWARDED TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW COMMISSION. (Short Title - Clark) . (a) Recommendation of Planning Director. 20. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL OPPOSING LEGISLATIVE EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT'S AUTHORITY TO ASSESS DUES. (a) Request of Council from March 16, 1981 meeting. 1. OTHER 22. ADJOURN1,EITT PAGE 4 - COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 23, 1931 T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 ti N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES -- MARCI-I 23 , 1931 - 7 : 30 P.m . 1 . ROLL CALL: Present : Mayor. Wilbur A. Bishop (arriving at 7 :42 P .�I. ) ; President of Council John Cook ; Councilmen Kenneth Scheckla (arriving at 7 :42 P-q. ) and Tom Brian; Council- woman Nancie Stimler; Legal Counsel , Joe Bailey; City Administrator, P,aeldon R. Barker ; Director of Public Works , Frank Currie ; Finance Director/City Recorder , Doris Hartig; Planning Director , Aldi.e IIo;,iard ; Administra- tive Secretary, Loreen 1,17.ilson. 2 . Call to order by President of Council , John Cool:. 3. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR 'THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEiIS . (a) No one appeared to speak Mayor Bishop and Councilman Scheckla arrived - 7 :42 P .m. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - March 9 and 16 , 1931 . (a) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 5 . APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS : $82 , 78-7 . 12 (a) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 6 . MONTHLY REPORTS - Receive and File Building Library Finance Planning (a) Motion by Councilman Brian , seconded by Councilman Cook to receive and file . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 7 . RESOLUTION NO. 81-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL TRANS- FERRING FUNDS FOR UNFORSEEN EXPEiNSES . ($1 ,000 unemployment) . Ratifying Council action of 3/16/81 . (a) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Cook to accept and ratify Council action of 3/16/81 . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 8 . ACCEPT AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO EXECUTE . . Agreement between City of Tigard and Oregon Electric Railroad for 10 year right-of-way use for sewer line installed for 74th Avenue LID. (a) Motion by Councilman Brian , seconded by Councilman Cook to accept and authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to execute . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 9 . APPROVAL OF OLCC APPLICATIONS .American Legion Post #158 - 11578 S .W. l'aciCic 1ii9hway , '1'i-.ard - DBA Application .DeCicco ' s Old Country Pizza - 12122 S . W. Scholls Ferry Road , Tigard - RMB Application .Casa Pinata - 11290 S .W. Bull Mtn . Rd . , Tigard - DC Appliention (a) City Administrator stated that the Police Department would recom- mend approval of all licenses . (b) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler. , seconded by Counc1- 1-mau Scheckla to approve . Approved by unanimous vote of "ouncil. . 10 . ORDINANCE No. 81-10 AN ORDINANCE CALLING FOR A SPECIAL FLECTION TO SUBMIT TO VOTERS TAY LEVY FOR TIGARD LOAVES AND FISHES SENIOR CENTER. ($ 10 , 000) (a) City Administrator recommended approval noting that he had reviewed their proposed budget . This is scheduled for the May 19th election. (b) Mr. . `,/ern Christensen , Tigard Loaves and Fishes representative , stated that the increase of the levy request over last year was due to the new costs of operation for the new senior center and inflation. (c) Motion by Councilman Brian , seconded by Cotincilwoman Stimler to adopt. Approved by unanimous vete of Council . 11 . APPROVE LOAVES AND FISHES LEASE AGREEMENT - Senior Center (a) City Administrator stated that this was the fourth draft of the agreement. He noted that it was for one year and requested Counr_il modify section 1 paragraph (c) to note, that the City would be responsible for outside painting of the facilities . (b) Lengthy discussion followed between Council , staff and Loaves and Fishes regarding the renewal clause. PACE 2 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 (c) Councilman Brian requested Council consider different lan ,uaoc for the section 3 ` Duration of Agreement I . (d) Dick Masterbr.00k - Director of Loaves and Fishes Inc . -- discussed the wordage with Legal Counsel and COunC.il of Section 3 . (e) Councilman Brian suggested that Section 3 bo amended to read as follows : This agreement shall remain in force for one yt-ar periods , and at the end of each year. , and upon satisfactory performance of the terms of the agreement , Loaves and Fishes shall have the right to enter into another lease for in additional year . ( f) Councilwoman Sti.mler requested that in Section 1 paragraph (c) that replacement of ot:tcidc lighting would be the responsibility of the City also . (g) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilmani Scheckla to approve agreement as amended and authorize the ^layor and City Recorder to sign on behalf of the City. Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 12 . PROCLAMATION - Building Safety Week - April 5-11 , 1951 (a) Mayor Bishop noted that he would be signing a proclamation for Building Safety Week and suggested that the press publish the information available on the week of April 5 - 11 . PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8 :00 P.M . 13 . ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 3-51 (Valenzuela) A request by M. Valenzuela for a zone change from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" and annexa- tion to the City of Tigard located at 9445 S .W. Mountain View Lane , Washington County Tax NIap 2Sl 11BA, Tax Lot 1100 . (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Planning Director gave brief synopsis of request . (c) Public Testimony No one appeared to speak. (d) Planning Director recommended approval . (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) ORDINANCE No. 51-11 AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING ANNEYATIOI••i OF LANDS BY THE BOUNDARY COMMISSION, ORDER NO. I.606 , AND ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN PAGE 3 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23, 1981 AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE' CITY OF TIGARD TO CONFORM i,,iTH THE ,NI'O ,Ftp PLAN AS ADOPTED AND DECLARING AN EtiIERC'ENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE . (Short Title - Valenzuela) (g) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler , seconded by CoUr.cilman Brian to adopt . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 14 . ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 4-81 (hall. Blvd . Baptist Church) NPO #6 A request by Hall Boulevard Baptist Church for a zone change from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-5 "Single Family Residential" and annexation_ to the City of Tigard located at 14245 S .W. Elall Bout( - vard Washington County Tax Map 2S1 11BA, Tax Lot 400 . (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Planning Director gave brief synopsis o1 request . (c) Public Testimony No one appeared to speak . (d) Planning Director recommended approval. . (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) ORDINANCE NO. 81-12 AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING ANNEXATION OF LANDS BY THE BOUNDARY REVIEW COMMISSION, ORDER NO . 1607 , AND ADOPTING FINDINGS 1,iITH RESPECT TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING .IAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD TO CONFORM WITH THE NPO #6 PLAN AS ADOPTED AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Short Title- Hall Blvd. Baptist Church) (g) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 15 . VACATION REQUEST OF A CERTAIN PORTION OF KNEELAND ESTATES I SUBDIVT- SION . (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Planning Director gave synopsis of request noting that the plat had been recorded in the County before the developer requested a different lot layout for a revised plat . The original plat needs to be vacated so the developer can refile a new plat . (c) Public Testimony No one appeared to speak. PAGE 4 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 (d) Planning Director recommended approval . (e) Public Hearing Closed ( f) ORDT1IANCI? No . 81-13 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A CERTAIN PORTION OF KNL'ELANI) ESTATES I PLAT OF RECORD, IN THE, CI:TY OF TIGARD , VAS H INCTON COUNTY, OREGON . (g) Motion by Councilman Cook , seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt . Approved by unnnimous vote of Council . 16 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVLSION CPR 1-81 (1•1illowbrook/Canterbury Ilei Opts - Density Change in the Comprehensive Plan) NI10 #6 A request by Gramco Development Compatly for a Comprehensive Plan Review from density of two units per acre to twelve and twenty units per acre (A2 to Al2 and A20 Multi-Family Residential ) located at various properties abutting Pacific Highway, S .IJ. Naeve Road and S .1%1. 109th Avenue (l,la.3h . Co . Tax Map 2S1 10A, 'Tax Lots 4200 , 4390 ,4402 ,4500 , 4600 and Tax Map 2S1 LOD, Tax Lots 500 & 600) . (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Planning Director read into the record letter dated 2-24-81 from Mr. & Mrs . Charles Pecl< Opposing the development . lie -ave briol synopsis of request. (c) Public Testimony Proponents : John Block , 20400 S .W. Boones Ferry Road , Tualatin , Plnnninc; con- sultant , advised he was hired to present and develop the plan . Bill Sanders , owner of Tax Lot 600 expressed support and noted stability of land . Archie M. Erickson, owner of Tax Lot 4600 noted support and expressed need for more housing dile to industrial increases i.n area . Len Osborn , owner of property, expressed support of proposal . Bob Miller, Attorney for i'-IDS Properties , sughested this would be a good opportunity to comply with LCDC roal #10 John Block gave further evidence in support of allowing the proposed zone change . Opponents : Marge Davenport , 15100 S .W. 109th , expressed her dissatisfaction with the proposal and requested Council support the comprehensive plan as it shows this site new. PACE 5 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 Jane Miller, 10920 S .l1T. Highland Drive , concerned about the loss of the natural resources and sewer and water run-ofi Barney McPhillips , 15100 S .1J. 109th , di.SCUSSed With Colincil. the water run-off problems in this site , and the affect on the sur- rounding areas . Peggy Davenport , 15100 S .W. 109th , presented a petition with 70 signatures of surrounding property owners opposing the proposed zone change . Elizabeth Anderson , 15001 S .1•1. 109th, opposed to the density 01- the project and concerned with the loss of the datura ] resources . Betty Peck, 11000 S .W. Naeve Street , opposed the denslAy acid increased use of the roads in the area . Cross Examination : John Block , Marge Davenport and Peggy Davenport addressed their statements to Council reenforcing their earli;r comments (d) Planning Director recommended approval requesting Council nota that before any development could tale place , the specific plans would come before the NPO, Planning Commission and Council for public hearings arid comments . (e) Public Hearing Closed (f) After lengthy discussion by Council regarding concerns of so.il stability, street systems and density aemands , Councilman Brian moved to remand the matter to the Planning Commission for further consideration. �lHo.ytion seconded by Councilman Coolc . lo�� I rCt'�iC '"'P CT c>, Approved by unanimous vote of Council . RECESS : 9 : 34 P.M. RECONVENE : 9 :47 P.M. 1.7 . S .W. 72ND AVENUE AREA LID NO. 21 A public hearing held by the Tigard City Council to only consider new evidence in the proposed 72nd Avenue area LID No . 21 proposal . (a) Mayor Bishop stated that before the public hearing would begin , Attorney Beth Blount requested to speak with Council . (b) Attorney Blount stated that she represents a number of large property owners in the proposed 72nd Avenue LID assessment area . The . property owners were concerned that though the improvement to the street is needed , the magnitude of the proposed improve- ment is not needed . She requested Council table the public hearing for 120 days and form an ad-hoc committee comprising 72nd Avenue businessmen , members of City Staff, and professional engineers (Marlin. DeHaas and Gene Ginther) to study the street and come up with an alternative plan for improvement . PAGE 6 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 (c) Lengthy discussion followed between Council , staff , Attorney Blount and other members of the audience . (d) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler , seconded by Councilman Brian to hold public hearing May 18 , 1981 . (e) After further consideration Councilwoman Stimler amended the motion to hold a study session on May 18 , 1981 to have the ad- hoc committee report presented to Council and hold a public hearing on June 1 , 1981 with a vote from Council . Amended motion was seconded by Councilman Brian . Approved by majority vote of Council . Councilman Cook voting; nay. ( f) Mayor stated the ad-hoc committee is to supply a comparative report to Council on the proposed LID. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARINGS 18 . ZONE CHANGE ZC 1-81 (Cash ' s Realty B2 & RU-4 to CP Zone Change) NPO #4 A request by Cash ' s Realty for a Zone Change from Washington County B2 and RU-4 to City of Tigard CP "Commercial Professional" taking in the whole block surrounded by Franklin Street , 66th Avenue , Gonzaga Street , and 67th Avenue (Washington County Tax ",Iap 2S1 lAA, Tax Lots 6700 , 6800 , 6900 , 7000 , 7100 , 7200 , 7300 & 7301 ) . (a) Planning Director stated the Planning Commission recommended approval . (b) ORDINANCE NO. 81-14 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESP? CT TO AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (Cash ' s Realty) (c) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler , seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 19 . ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZCPD 2-81 AND CONDITIONAL USE CU 1-81 NPO #7 (Dawn ' s Inlet R-7 to R-7PD and Single Family attached in an R-7 zone) A request by Jon Davis for a Preliminary Plan Review for a Zone Change from City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" to City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential Planned Unit Development" zone to build single family homes and a Conditional Use request for a single family attached home on one lot located at 11885 S .W. 113th Place (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DC, Tax Lot 3500) . (a) Planning Director noted that applicant removed the request for a conditional use and was now only requesting the zone change planned development . Planning commission recommended approval . PAGE 7 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 (b) ORDINANCE NO . 81-15 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WIT11 RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 'ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (Dawn ' s Inlet) . (c) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to adopt . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . PUBLIC HEARING 20 . ZONE ORDINANCE AMEND.iENT ZOA 9-80 A request by the City of Tigard to amend Chapter 18 . 59 of the Tigard Municipal Code relating to Design Review. (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Planning Director stated this had been before Council at study sessions and discussed at that time . Mayor Bishop requested Council consider rewriting the design review ordinance and appointing a Design Review Board. Planning Director requested Council pass this ordinance now since it is only a housekeeping type ordinance and then work on revi- sions to the process later. Lengthy discussion followed between Mayor and Planning Director. (c) Motion by Mayor Bishop to table item until future meeting, seconded by Councilman Brian. Motion passed 3-2 . Councilwoman Stimler and Councilman Cook vot- ing Nay. 21 . LCDC DENSITY REVIEW (a) Mayor Bishop requested that the Comprehensive Plan be considered by Council . He distributed to Council copies of some recent newspaper articles dealing with LCDC & MSD actions . (b) After discussion between Council and staff, Councilwoman Stimler moved to submit the Comprehensive Plan to LCDC for approval , motion seconded by Councilman Scheckla . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . (c) Mayor and staff discussed at great length the issue of LCDC requiring 10 units to the acre in the. Urban Growth Boundary. a' 22 . RESOLUTION NO. 81-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REQUEST- ,_ ING AN ANNEXATION PETITION BE FORWARDED TO THE BOUNDARY COMMISSION. (Short title - Clark) �' PAGE 8 -- REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 (a) Planning Director r. ecornuiendod approv,11. . (b) Mayor Bishop asked if all the property ot.,.iers had been nc�t. i f i«_,d . Planning Director stetted yes . (c) Motion by COnnCi- IWO :an Stimler , seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 23 . RESOLUTION NO. 81-24. A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD C i TY COtTxc 1. L OppoS li'�G I.I1GISLATIVE EXTENSION OF SEIZVECI: DISTRICT ' S APT11UR 1"f'Y 'f'O ASSI-.SS I)LTES . (a) Motion by Cot.tncilwoman Stimler , seconded by Councilman Brian to approve . Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 24. OTHER (a) Director of Public ldorks requested Coulici l approve a SlIbd i vi S ion Compliance Agreement and Performance Bond for McCoy Estates at 92nd Durham Road . Motion by Councilman Cook , seconded by C:ouncilmaI 13ri.an to approve and authorize i,iiyc)r and City Recorder to sign . Approved by unanimous vote of GOnnC11 . (b) Planning Director. reported Mr. Carlson of the Boundary C01111niSSiOT) stated that the boundaries of another city would not make an island on the edge of our city limits . Mayor Bishop stated that }te felt this was incorrectu<<d had asked for a 1es;al opinion in the matter . This should be received be- forethe April 13 , 1981 , mec,ting when Council will consider soma island annexat.i.ons . (c) Mayor expressed interest in annexing entire island area of Tied( - man and North Dakota . (d) Legal Counsel stated that City tool: judgement against Mr . Bowman in the suit against property on 92nd Avenue and would know more by August 20 , 1981 . (e) Legal Counsel advised Council of a pettditi7 suit with David Churchregarding an unproper method of hearing of makin- findings in appeal hearings by Council . He recommended Council save fees of a law suit and reconsider the matter again , taking the proper means of making findings in matter . Legal Counsel and Plannin- Director will set up meeting again for Council . -AGE 9 - REGULAR COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23 , 1981 s� rs r ( f) City Administrator advised Col111C:il that the signal. lights are not Operating correctly on S .ttil, Pacific I140hway and the State Highway Department has stated it would can be adjusted . be one week before this (g) City Administrator reminded Council of the first 13udget Committee meeting to be held on March 25 , 1981 . 25 . ADJOURMHENT: 11 : 31 Wl ty Recorder ATTEST: �1 /�'"'"��Y-`"Y Gam. <<�• f Mayor i PAGE 10 — REGULAR COUNCILr1INUTES — March 23, 1981 MIN Date 3/23/81 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) ,AGENDA ITEM jV 13 Lr-em escr p tion. cob; R99CTIFM ar,�N RE[rsc WN —..CPR 1-81 WillOw 14raok/C'anterb4ry Heights - Density Proponent (for) Opponent (against) Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation /. . � Clic-G l2i �l-(..(_�iL✓,' C 1,, J �•- SRI Date 3/23/81 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following iter_: (Please print your name) Item Description: AGENDA ITEM # 14 �.,z.-rr� Ysunxsns,�r. roponent (for) Opponent (against) game, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation !ii 15 ET H F-)L v�j; �� v ! C-1 e t�JL_ -i i 1'j-1 t-4 C 1 ------- I!! — s . s iI c l !4 t !►I PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL PROGR-A-M BUDGET I-ARCH 23, 1981 Community Protection Police __5,,955.77 Public Works 7,273,85_ Municipal Court 254.61 Planning 642.02 Building 1,036.84 Total Community Protection 15.163.09 _ Home & Community Quality Public Works 6,415.82 Social Services Library 848.97 Aged Services Youth Services Historical Total Social Services 848.97 Policy & Administration Mayor & Council 244.18 Administration 477.65 Finance 1.230.00 Total Policy & Administration 1.951.83 City Wide Support Functions Non-departmental 5,868.84 Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 17,205.09 CAPITOL BUDGET Community Protections Road Acquisition & Dev. Parks Acquisition & Dev. Storm Drainage Total Community Protection Support Services Building Improvements ?II,3g?_94 DEBT SERVICE General Obligation Bond Bancroft Bond 24.940.50 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Contract TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN __822787-12 MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23, 1981 FROM: 3ULLDING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1981 February ' s building activity included permits for 11 signs, 11 single family residential, 6 residential alter and repair, 4 commercial., 13 commercial alter and repair, 1 demolition and 1 site grading for a total valuation of $1, 701, 951. 00. Fees for 36 permits $8, 965. 43 Fees for 11 signs 175.00 Plumbing Activity - 43 1, 546. 00 Mechanical Activity - 38 743-00 Business Licenses - 39 1, 601. 00 TOTAL - - - $13,019. 43 Sewer Permits - 13 $11,175. 00 Sewer Inspections - 13 450.00 King City did not have any building activity this month. 0O000OOC7O00000 OOOOC7C) OOOOOOO OO N N OO 000 OC) OO oO 000000 C) O0CDOOOOOOLn O CD mm Ll- l` m m 000 1 m -P Lnt` MOMM NM) nMC3LO 1 LnOOA000 -iL`- OON O -'t OCZ) L- U7O0000 1 � O 0cl •-1 cr O1 Ln r-7 d O 1-7 CT LM t)D Lf7 C17 M7 O cri N M O 1Y cl 1 1 [D C7 •- V7 M O C70 117 O _zp m Lf) l0 Lf) m m Lf) CL In -:zr ri r-1 N r-; O CA r-I r--I Cv7 ri QD (T ro NCJN { > -t4 N 4bl* O 3 C O -f-3 +i •ri .,i Ul -q O 1 P f•a P4 fa P L-: E mea c�a c\a m m \ C4\ �4 P_\ k\\\\\\'P -oo ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro� I r-I ra r-i r-i .•-a r-1 r-1 r-i .-I r--t r-1 .-i .•-� .-i .--1 .-� r� ca ca ca ro ro ro ca ro ro ro ro ca ro ro ro ca ro 1-1 r-1 r-I -1 r-1 r-1 r-I r-1 r-I r-1 r-I •ri •ri i •r1 •ri •1 •ri •ri •.� •ri •'; .:i cu to ro ca ca ca ro ca ca ca ro ro ca co ro ca ro (a ca 4.3 4J 4-) -P -P -I-' .+:1 -u -N •I-) .4-3 4-3 _P +3 4- -N .r-1 •r1 •ri •ri •r1 •ri •ri - -I •ri •r1 •ri •ri •-A •rA •ri --1 •r-I •11 1 O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U 0 U U U U U U -4 a) 0 a) 0 Cil Cil 0 M N a) a) N W a1 O 0 W t-4 H P. H f4 H fa fa 1-+ N k N fa " f-4 1-4 P f4 u O 4q' U -O -O _0 _0 U _0 _0 O -O U _0 •0 _0 U 'O _0 m O O a) a) O 0 O a) m O 0 cD a) cn cn a) a) a) "� rl •rl •ri •ri •ri '-1 •r{ •ri •.� •ri •ri •-I •ri ri •a •r1 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E r i E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E I]D cn a1 m m a) al m ro al a) m m a) v m a) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m fa P H r- H P f-4 H H f-4 P fa Sr H fa P H U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U } S cr } O Cr Cr S m =1 L LJ Ir Li fI] LJ � <L O ro ro O >- +� O O +� E- fa cr a) S (D O 4-3 -P -P a) >, 3 a) a) -i-) O ro r- z h L f 4-3 4-) > 4-3 a) I U a) a) a) 3 P N L 3 3 a) (11 J a) -P O H a) fa r4 N -r-I 4 3 a) a) m a) a) a) C -P f-f P CT C C a) fa U Lr) +- U 3 a) T T 3 n 3 fa 7 C • 3 (D al .-I 3 u fa P a) a) a) a) •ri a) a) fa •I--1 >. ro N S C U ro CU >, O O O O O a) a) -0 C P U -i C -N +) +> > a) Li Li S > > -P LO P -i C a) _ m CU 3 3 ro U U U U > > > ro +) CO a1 a) U) U7 Cn ¢ fa ¢ ¢ CO 3 0_ O p O 0 > -A 3 ca cc •ri r-1 > co .-1 0 > o_ ro -P fn co U P -0 4-3 +3 Li z Q 0- ca cU U) U) Cn r-I U) H m Q o_ Q C C C O N CA U7 r-I r-I •ri CO U) E M P C O•Cn c c ca a) a) a) -Y a) -P O c >, 0 0 0 o ca 3 r-I r-i C- 3 3 CO 1 a) m E J C) t -N CD a) C .-1 r-I r-1 U r-1 C r-i -N (D -P P C -N -P -P J r-I _0 C o o -r-I -0 -0 = •ri a-) -o cU C J U) +-3 C P fr a) 3 3 3 0 3 ro s r-i W P C N :-3 0_ Cl O_ CL E •.-i = t U E E C N C f.4 S •ri I r-e to 00 a) 0 0 N 0 0 0 s O H O ro r-1 ro m a) Ln E E E P •ri Ca U U ro •r1 •ri fa C Cil ro ro O = a] C17Y [ncn w UL11U UL72 = CTYYOO ro ro Ca •riUzE: cr) U7Q. zz > 3 U L73E H m fa co U7 S S S L- fa m 2 (n 0 3333 333 33333333; 3 CO 3333333 33 3 C) Tl U7cnU7cn 3cncnM3M U7 U7cn McnMMcn3333 mM cnCn MCn cnU733 M M cn coc) En cn U) U') LO "A LO «) t0 4 O Lf] Lf) Ln O LO O O m O O O m m m O i- O co N 'It 0) O O LD O 1 0 U .--I m LD m O m m O m CJD -• .-I 110 N O CD N m m m m O r-i N [ N ­4 m N O O N m m I'D t-r 1-1 O N N m L- N m N C- O r-I C'7 m m O L- m k0 � m LI- n r-i C'7 N N 110 r-1 N -Y N m O -I r i MMmmr- ntl-) mmn nn " --J* " m Q UD110l.o UDOr-IONN Nr-IOOmI�tON \0 N r-1 r-I ra r-I 0) r i r-i -1 Q7 r-i r-I r--i .-i r-I r4 r- e- r-i l0 UD �.O LI- r--1 r-I r-I m r i U L1 U U O O O 0 co co co U) U) (n co E co Q ¢ S U) 3 c2 L) ri -Y -Y -Y ri N C C >, N fd H 3 C ro N 0 0 o U CO ro CU z O 4.3 ro •r1 •r•1 O U C Q CL 0- P •ri a -ice i-) CU a) •• -i-3 U) C: U U C 01 a) a) a) O O U a) ro a) 3 7 C O r-1 ¢ U U U U U _0 a) •ri CI) L) Y '0 P P O • -r-I r-i r1 -r-I •.-I 43 r-1 -P -r-i C C -a-� 4.2 •r-1 U -1.1 a) a) cs- C+- Cy_ 3 a) a) J 3 w H I • cs- CU 3 U) U) •4') C U fa C 014- " G.- z p Fa c. (1) CA O " m r-1 C C U " D C Ca C Ca M O O 3 3 di cL a) U O 4-3O O 3 U) U) H0 O 0 O C f4 N C r-I 4-� i-) U) -4 rA O r.+ r1 F-4 U) U U (A C C •--N Cl) > X N O a) a) U) U) U) (a O ro X X 6L ro CU • to U 3 O Ca O (ll +3 •r1 •r1 U) U) M 4-) (1) O 0 - U rs -Y S' 1 1 U) a) C -r-I •r1 G a) a) r-1 0- O -Y C 4-3 3 f-4 fa U) r-L .0 -0 a) C ro +) J U 0 O r-i (D CU Ca CO U r-I P H Li L- •ri H " a) >, Ca cu O U aI m C a) .0 -0 E O -4 al C r-1 E: O Cn O C) co ro () a) a) E a) G) 1-- L G+ U O •ri ro di -P -N o ­q O O O U C' E 0 }-H a) U CL-P 4-> > -0 U E 4J -P JP 3 +1 fa +1 4� U .-I Ir M S U E -0 a) En >. U -0 C C C E4-3 C ro C C 3 C C r-1 P O .-i C ro -P C O O .,..I CE: Li L'i 6•4 L c ro a) O O O 3 •ri H i- ro (U U L-+ C ro O ;4 a) O z C -f L7 L7 4-3 a: . 0 •r1 r G) •ice + Y COCU E •ri - ) -N N ri r-I P 3 m E -a3 0 0 C J J U 3 a) a) r-i cF- > O t-L r-I c-- Q 0_ 0_U r-1 C •i-) 4-3' a) r-I r-i a) 7 4-1 E 0_ U f•+ E E LJ E C -O > > •ri C a) E ra a) -r1 E E E x r-I 3 N r4 r•4 r-i ri C O C ro E En SO (0 (01 0 • -r-I o ca ro r_ m -P •ri Int c CO ca ca ca 0 0 0 0 >, o o a) o cit r-4 (a 3cncnnl— trvL3 © mmL7cnt- 1-- 1— SSSnmYt— m0- JYYL73c-) 1— S N F- C- O W _ Q1 [] N CLH U7 Z LO H U7 N C u O .1i (Ti 00 C7 Go U) Ll- 0C) CDC- C) Ll- :3 O OOmC) loCDd CO t0 rl) O U) •-i O N N :0 N n n 11-T n r) N d ro cn r-i N ta ta 1 Cccrac � � � m 01 f-1 N fa f-+ P L4 f4 N O O m 0 a) 0 O N m U- L- Li Li Li Li Li Li 1-4 T P4 LO a) O co O m co Un ro -P m al a) a) O w ai a) T O • -0 a) C C C C C C C C fa 'O ro a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ L > O F4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = a) -1 = -comm mmmmmCDm L- m U) m (a fa k fa fa c4 ti W 4- 1 C Q) m m a) a) a) m m L- O r 1 -r-i •ri CL Cl C1 C1 0- 0- C1 C- al C ro C_ Cl CL 0 0L O- Cl CZ Li L = O _ = m = = = = m C -i--= U) m C co 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = O a) cn3mm mcnG7U) U) (nco H E N cn C) -i00N0L(7i0IYN O a) 0 (0m mmr-i r--1N nMItm L ro N N Ln CO co m CD co CD CD co +� r-i r) N Ln Ln Ln Ln Lo Ln Ln L0 Cr r--I N r-1 -1 r-I •-i r-i r-! r4 r-I r-1 O N Li O J T O rl F— > U -ri r-II C C -P m O H U m 01 (a r-1 a) N O m O Ol O U a) U C >- C a) •rI Cr (�- fe •rl T U U Q O O T t '--1 Ol• 4 '-•1 = L C e 0) U 0- C > •ri CC 1 E ro 0- ca ro 0-•ri G4 7 CD C O 0. P4 -ri E: O _0 a) L W ro J E O -ice U') r-i u) Ii m O U -i CT •11 O -ice U ro c cu =1 C C k .--i Co C - 4 -r-i L -ice L1 O O ro a) C CO U Ol 4-) U (a a) •ri '0 U7 4-3 C 3 1T E a) ro C1 (1) O = -p ro t- U O _0 -rI r-i O_-Y () C U L r m -I -ri U) a) Cr) U C) -H a) O :3 Cr 41 ro a) •ri fa Ci C U -I> > 4-3 CL O ro •ri -r-i 03 E ri U U 4-3 •-1 C . p " O ro 0) w CO 4.3 .r1 3 a) m C •ri -1 - •ri C31 C7 fa C E 4-2 -ij cn CL r♦ C) U C p--r •ri (V =1 o C a) 'r-i O •rI • 4 CO •ri co LLU) Ji-) �-tCLMU3 => M Y Date: 2-28-81 J FINANCIAL STATEMENT EXPENDITURES OPERATIONAL BUDGET 1980-81 Current Year-To Budget Month Date la COMMUNITY PROTECTION Police Services 1.1 1.1.1 Patrol 499,459 35,457 337,527 1.1.2 Investigation 120,366 7,502 71,886 1.1.3 Communication 145,272 10,955 94,462 1.1.4 Administration 74,302 6,535 38,727 T;I•.,,'. 839,399 60,449 542,6 Pub?.ic Works 1.2 1.2.1 Street Lighting 83,000 2,568 41,544 1.2.2 Traffic Signal-Marking-Signs 33,467 1,940 20,289 1.2.3 Engineering 43,721 2,182 23,288 1.2.4 Admin. & Clerical 25,706 2,087 16,758 TOTAL 185,894 8,777 101,879 Municipal Court 1.3 1.3.1 Arraingments & Trials 29,605 2,540 19,054 Punning & Zoning 1.4 1.4.1 Current Planning 80,728 5,964 49,364 1.4.2 Advance Planning 10,413 238 1,962 TOTAL 91.141 6,202 51,326 Building Inspection & Enforcement 1.5 1.5.1 Plan Checking 27,811 2,231 18,078 1.5.2 Field Inspection 50,574 3,965 32,782 1.5.3 Support Services 11,141 929 7,267 1.5.4 Program Administration 13,,873 1,128 9,253 TOTAL 103,399 8,253 67,380 I Page 2 EXPENDITURES 1980-81 Current Year-To -Budget Month Da to 2. HOME AND COMMUNITY QUALITY Public Works 2.1 2.1.2 Sanitary Service 182,971 3,341 72,013 2.1.3 Streets & Roads 341,358 2,8.17 141,193 2.1.4 Parks 70,792 4,863 43,644 2.1.5 Storm Water Control + 1600 50,646 = 52,246 5,604 39,994 2.1.6 Special Projects 13,736 1,011 8,464 2.1.7 Ancillary Service 34,999 2,362 20,102 2.1.8 Engineering 71,366 5,773 47,729 2.1.9 Admin. & Clerical 28,407 2,307 18,503 2.1.11 Insect Control 91000 -0- 7,662 ,-= 303 275 -gni. QAC 4 TOTAL �.,.,,., �.,..,,�.� - �,.�: 2ci.y7v goo 30 3. SOCIAL SERVICES Library 3.1 3.1.1 Technical Services 29,026 2,212 18,506 3.1.2 Community Services 66,240 5,157 45,959 3.1.3 Operations & Maintenance 3,134 182 1,965 3.1.4 Administration 14,072 1,109 8,867 TOTAL112,472 8,660 75,297 Youth & Aged Services 3. 3.3.1 Loaves & Fishes 6,000 -0- 5,422 3.4.1 Youth Services 59,825 -0- 53,326 TOTAL =3.748 4. POLICE AND ADMINISTRATION Mayor & Council 4.1 4.1.1 Policy & Direction 10.982 QRS 4,929 City Administration 4.2 4.2.1 Management Functions 43,750 3,431 26,895 4.2.2 Staff Functions 23,580 1,831 12,902 4.2.3 Ancillary Functions 4,424 345 2,724 TOTAL 71.754 5,607 42,521 Fiscal Administration 4.3 4.3.1 Finance Program +157 92,891 93,048 7,491 60,834 4..3.2 City Records 30,969 2,285 17,373 4.3.3 Management Support 10,609 897 7,101 TOTAL +157 134,469 =134,626 10,573 85,308 Page 3 EXPENDITURES 1980-81 Current Year-To Budget Month Date 5. CITY WIDE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS Non-Departmental Functions 5.1 5.1.1 Legal Services 22,500 -0- 12,658 5.,1.2 Insurance - G,000 46,875 = 38,875 1,461 35,060 5.1.3 Utilities 44,872 4,493 21,300- 5.1.4 Pent 7,975 440 5,135 5.1.5 Postage 7,000 184 610 5.1.6 Audit 8,500 _0- 8,160 5.1.7 Membership 10;848 -v- 10,803 5.1.8 Codification of Ordinances 3,700 -0- 1,,j57 5.1.9 Stationery & Supplies 3,000 175 2,596 5.1.10 Bldg. & Equip. Maint. & Repair +751 7,500 = 3,281 -0- 2,056 5.1.11 Contractual Services 21,260 2 277 13,706 5.1.12 Unemployment Reserve +750 +1600 1,000 = :3,350 -0- 2,691 5.1.13 Donations 2,000 -0- -0- 5.1.14 Publicity & Comm. Relations 7,225 _`8- 128 5.1.15 Materials & Supplies 700 3 143 5.1.16 Printing 500 + 67,661 _0_ 23 5.1.17 Office Equipment +7219 60,442 967 62,389 5.1.18 Unclassified Personnel 100 ( 1,398) 718 5.1.19 Contingency -1600 -157 309,180 = 307, 266 -0-- -0- 5.1.20 Elections 1,700 TOTAL --.593 566.877 = 567,470 8,602 179,233 6. COMMUNITY PROTECTION Home & Community Quality 6.2 6.2.1.3(7) Road Acq. & Development 728,192 ( 236) 120,248 6.2.1.4(3) Parks. Acq. & Development 77,893 35,758 Total 806,085 ( 236) 156,006 Divisions 6.5 6.5.1:13(1) Donations 2,000 6.5.1 Bldg. Inprovement 287,000 67,722 220,112 TOTAL 289,000 67,722 220,644 7. DEBT SERVICE 7.1 General Obligation Bonds 10,000 -0- 10,000 7.1.1 Gen. Oblig. Bonds Interest 638 -0- 425 TOTAL 10 638 10,425_ 7.2 Bancroft Improvement. Bonds 62,090 -0- 20,083 7.2.1 Bancroft Imp. Bonds Interest 21,451 930 8,416 TOTAL _83,541 930 28,499 11� 2- 043 X155 GRAND TOTAL +2350 4,204,356 = 4,206,706 y EO[c0 N. c d 00 CD s o d X d ,7 CD vl O .0 y N L `n T 0. cn U-1 m M O cIJ d O Vl N T r N N O d r In �T T N 1� M M .0 M .� '7 r 00 O O v C v o 0 0 Cm ID O Y O y O r N d d w u � M n N ID,2. cn t/1 O M L O O ulco T 1) co c0 M m c n w � 10 M W W a is 21 1 v v x w ^ W d F O M M Z O 7 ul n O 7 r+WO W W co - M N Q 01 v m . ,, x ; o � CD y w N� .-t r` °o 14.-1 d I.- C+C-� d d ?+ ul .D •-' b '> q N O M O T ^10 1.0 .. r` O M ' M -7 N N.. .co ' a0 O M .. .. . .. .. .. .�1 T M ul O `D 43 C 00 W .-+ .7 C7 ,� b c0 .-. T O M Co M M �D a1 ^ M c0 t� 1D 1O �-. 'D O T MO C N co .-. N w M T a0 O N cD N M N 10 1� .--I �--� J T O �7 c 0 T M �7 .-1 �7 co M T N Ll a` c0 CO c0 E d O Ln T M In T O O f. N "-1 �--� — S � v u s+' O C O d CD cn O 93 41 L W O. U H of E m W cc Q le. �. R' C N O L d a. o 'w N V . ap m b H 7 E H' E G +� E d d G y O V d d O +J w al H M q 5 O C C C: d F. O H m C. E `� O X C O O d y 'O u C b o d ". 0 i. T -.+ O. U H O O v. Le V .}I r.. CS id-1 L V O. �/ [AS 'J +'a 7 r O t .W E cQ ami - F C: c1 a w C C d ►E.1 G to W W N rEi A >, s. d >, +� d v C m b + m d y o >+ d E +� u C C b o 6 v w u k d E/3 •-1 M U as H 6 ^J -.+ C) %+ 'O .-1 d -.� ci O a1 i[i m .0+ ai < .G E Fp+ a d W p w a o n v a) ..X. •.� m m cn o o a - v L 7 O _ O O Y C p O r o7 41 r y 00 m x U c d T o _zr m w m 00 N p c� < .. `O C7 r1 U r M U C r N Cl J C(i .O CO Si 03 O .. O O• p �Y -7 O O u) 00 p. cn N mO :i �7 r m F A O O O op p lu = fA 4. .o N O I'D rn _ O cl C. W C L' ca ' CO - a 0 m p Y V43 ., rn r N Qa a: w N � ul a' - O y •�n a' rn _ o .a . Qa E Gsl _ w B,O O N N W G Q F O 7 r r V cc, cp V --- ao 6i N � N oo O r 00 In W Q C °> co O - -464 d w o a o v lo o w ngo t _ O d 1) _ m u y O oo - -4 m In i+ F .i rn r W - o ^� e .s a0 e v 10 rn r .n _ F+ ❑ N O f1 m 7 _ D L+. N �7 1n a0 U N lo M lo lo IN t vM In O, O r r -a e0 C -1 ( N _ a0 r �O N O` O �Y u'1 r 00 S O C o0 r N O �O C r 7 c+l N c Il O�. I .-' +n .--� O In c0 - In �7 n N Oco 0 v N M M a0 -� .7 •-+ .7 r N co v v m Y Qp - H V dl a a m < U 4 p � � a c x ,x vi cn Y q aVi v F+ v .i c o ti v F c� C C c, H 9 :..1 ? a H u a F Ll u v v C a� 3 >- H v O y u Is s. v � C C+. N I Y d'C 631 7 H :t. C '0 •.1 b C Y C ca y -a dO Y 7r C M V � Q u L- as u p ' Ni 7+ •O O� C M 7 �f O. V u O O� C 0 oaCAPrte. V W E„ m . v rn aC r p �-+ pil C S � O N 07 C w S a N x m m - C7 z 41 x 0 o , L w ^W En i F 'H-1 S UJI G� x cu 1 M tr] r 1 N N �D 01 cel r Cl r7 M CO O+ Ul < ty .P-� N N Ul O,. N Ul r D` O N O` E 1+ 'O S th C O� oO Ul M O cel U)• tll N 1z+ E- on N N �O O` •-I <'1 r t`-1 t"1 N t o O, U1 Ind w p� N N Ul O O, N v'1 r r .tea U W p @ O •• S O u-1 rn u-1 S S O ao u-i E d t[l V-1 N N .--1 �O '•O �7 rl � U1 �7 Ul v� r o of O O O. t0 'O S o O O O o o J o G N O N O O N ri S Q• O O O O pE.7 Oj n O CO O N W c0 O O O O O �+ O .-7 q r O q CO Iri 'a a, co c o to n r en r cn mC, l N N M T r S O N N r N _ d U-1 a0 Q+ Q� O 00 LnQ, .-1 .O n w O O N .--1 Ul C:- to CN r O1 U) O Ul N .•-t S N N U7 O O ^•+ --1 O O c. O -t O r U-f rn r O 00 .p m N N t•) .--� N N d v f4 v� W d C H54 \ >V N d hC ++ U to C U N N 10 0 U 67 W cn 0 +� 6C/ N ami y -�4 C .c d z x x d a F a a > ea a 3 a d W cn W t0 61 7 d d u d ...a ei F > > a .-1 > v> > a m x� d e0 d d A 4] V A A +? E- 0 d b > O u a - O 7'C O >. ca >> >� 67 L ca d ry� O y .--1 H cn d U3 M-1 M ,F. b-t it W H m Y 61 d Y+ O d d 5+ b+ F d H O d u .•d H u �] (..�, d C +� +� u 1] c- 1+ .0 2 d > O J O u 4 7 V C V d 0 d a C C •rl C ci 61 ++ W W O q U ++ .0C OU O' q O d V] w 0 O a O •-] p C y ,.7 > w to t .-+ y u W GL ..7 E% W O O (n U ...7 O U S Fsc N V V U O w E- -1 .-4 e4 N C• �4 N th d v1 'O c0 C+ �4 N o! C% ! O O O O O 1 N .-4 N ri .-/ r-1 .-t N r7 N N N N Cl cTl cif i+l F'1 e.'1 ('^I n Pl In ^) C9 Cn (r t1 c Pl cn O O O ti _ NM No CL 0 FJ3 T� 9: 00 fto -nd CrCi ep d N (tl 04 ++ C co v� r•d � a ❑ o •w A c en co C es C N � O � v W a G 4 00 N Q N y N t` ] O ++ X d N WWq W ] O Z cn y a Z w w . c�] s I r pct > m 7 F W d L W Z4 b'77 O Il N O+ H cn O` ON D d U. m W w C7 M E- 9= C .- a0 N M 00 C7 W E O n 10 N n � O� .-1 t� O O 00 N O 1 N O� l 1� 11 -� of N N ul N N W Q to 0� O` CV d n -N .O In J O n e0 C'1 N E m I O O O O O O O O O N O O ra O O O C) O O O O O O co O` O O v1 O O O O O O O T u'f O O d O h Cl 10 •'i 1+01 In H N n G7 ei r1 Yl 1 N In N r♦ t d r,. V Q` �1 CO �7 00 �--� -1 N N C> O W N (71O f� W n n O G C W �7 N .O ul N to Il f� c0 rc. w .. w .. w w .. w - .. .. Q1 C 1p �D n^rl O to .a Ol b �D 10 a A a7 L a G G y W R+ y v N d 00 W St O d C d aj y E H W r ,'a.+ m w ami � d tII M M 7r h. - ++ o. cn > d S. a) R C n DO R. w 3wr +�0i w 43 0 N C ar W 7 4 C a C y d 6 X L rn C C a W R a m ^a w E .., En a .-) -14 e� C A U — W ar lw. M es en w H +a )4 f+ aJ -N ? d d +) •O C d O �' U �O d d s4 d F u L cdi w a .ZI m o c cal d ►CI v vs v1 d v En to '4 o a r, a 1Ni n nt . 1 i In U-� O cn n In In o 11 c ._� In In In h In fh C va U3 G U G 7 0 0 4 06 0 V7 f+ M 7 CU Crii 7 O ,00 `A CA 00 C O+3 O cx c o e � - V3 L Y w C C> o H U 7 rn O Q G L- V� M +3 a rn !q f+ t M In. C �n s+ o Q •w N W a 0 0 y V A u O O C0 G 0 O 00 O W w co v w--i m E E- 1= Q q. C w a m aW z w o 4J x w 7 W d L EQ• y t =3 Z y y f 2 W W ? v) 3 C E--. 7 1-1 C • W O H C •CJ W \•- 4 O b ? cd Oa .E F tz7 S �V-1 c0 O M 10 N 00 O •--� �n �D �t N N Q• N .M1-i ul CO M .--I ca CL3 CD W y ♦: U-1 N W N �D M N N as m E+ °0 w O M O N .-., a, O O 10 Ln �D N M �7 r1 M N O N T N M1 .0 M r1 ul N 06 M1 M1 i1 C` N N 0 Q w M d O .X) W O '.E .--� -7 O a` N 1 O O O O N O O O O O O 10 O n O O O Cl O e-O O O O O N O O O O O O 0% e-7" Ln O O O O O �7 In O O 1 fD Cp "? N ID O_ O IO O M O O O O O Gt m O en an r` � n h et r- O O r` � O N 14 .7 Ll O O Q, ei .i m LM N � v-9 N d' •O co N t'7 co N O M1 O O .-i O O d .0 •D T O N O C` - O fG M �7 M1 M1 a0 .-1 10 00 O M1 Oa, 00 00 'T S N 10 00 O r• U Q• N .-1 •D W M � N O M1 M " N •l Q` M1 M1 O -! C .-.� .p 00 �7 M1 .O d a7 M1 M M O M S O m q a e W. y„3 C7 G v v v U My H M •{ V to Gca d V IV .cc q CdIV cnr. E ..0.1 M 4� JC +1 u C a.3 41 v O 0 C C G e0 0. W w U -a C C a ...� .+ ei ►+ w a V �+ d a ¢ H M M ^J C H G S^+ C 0 E- A, O 7.0 0 g 6 U G a .-/ N 0 •O H G C 00 •.-t U V] W rti *= dC C60 •.'1 C 3+ fa H V O3 N H ^� C ••+ •-a 0 H 0 H CQJ L H O 0 N 7 H H •C 7 V U H C H ,C 0 C .0 ••+ O 3w, a a3i A 0 0 u W F O 3 G 4 u H O +-' co 0 W N U3 [n cn to a s O 0 fi. ✓] NH. O C7 10 10 •a f` 00 a• %0 m N M w al w .i C• f •O +O CO cO �O •O CO •J •O b M f Qf W x b m f C1 C` M M M M M M [7 M M t7 M O M :'1 C-3 c^1 M O M M p � c m 0 W co -1 ca 6 1+ p O N 'O rn rn h L 10 M 00 CO C c7 c+l .D O C 7 O O O r-I a t\ m G ta. M N � � N W W C N .D m a S V a � � C C C N N to to C cc r9 N N N a w 6 ^ ap$p6 ^ - y tnm iEa. u o o oo M y 2W �CS 4 7E: a1 a t+ ri H W C w tat tr7 H ^t ao O M '10'� O co N H 00n N ¢: M O Q til •O Vl N en c 10N O O N N V v N .e•1 r o w N .v O r wS N r .D .--t o rt E.O N S N e') c clw Ct cD S S t��'1 .OD w C? C t„� N N y� N .-1 O T S S O O S N 0% CS m [O Q� N a7 r1 I1 �O C. N �O O T �p eh r-1 N m N 1 G r O u•, .D W CD uO•f r O S •--� O S to i N cl W Qw ap w w .D � O' Ilir td O th "'� N N W D, ON �Y .�1 r .D10 O y N N 48 O N 0�1 N W a W OU N N O 401 C N W M. 'O W t y m W aVi W 10 s+ 41 m m x a 'o N >•+ a a7 u a += C .4 aa. E•' GO. ^'a y 00 ON w w E ae y c O V d c •*� o v 4 o. o m E O 6 ;aa O V H 61 ti w C W <. P. to cn G ca G ei t o v o s o S v o � - 01 ' r r .••1 N N to < M W'O QD 111111 G p M C C Y C Q C LG N 6i 'C H V 7 as cn O a " G a F 7 Q � Q a W V7� G� .-a O � O cu aw ou U3 Q0 z w ca N1 ca m H W Ctti�. z M N N M N N N N O M O M F N C) 00 N ^•1 Q� .--1 M1 4"1 �'1 Ml S JO r M1 O S O .--i u•f .D M1 •� M O m i;-' a0 M1 M y H NO OMO I N pop D` N N N N O 'n 0` u'1 �D •-1 O Cil M N d M Q� u"1 w N Q F .• cD .D A E O rn .-i .M1 �n M N ul rn Ln .c r vl 'T w �• � C (,1 N 4i.••1 T Q` cPl e-1 Q� O O �l N �.^ T T1 1��7 M vl O �D O+ Ln '7 I-1C4 a-1 N N-iO -1 a0 Q` M 'D -:r M �7 O a0 rn n d a N O c% Ma, w r•t M w N O M CO G� Q� Q� e-/ M N �O D` O '•/ S r S v7 r N O cn M 1�N N M ul M W N O of cn H n M h 'T N N e-1 co O� d` cIt O m 14 O Q+ 14 Y H cn M c '•! S M1 S M'n O D` d M1 Ln M �D �D Ln S r N .--I N N .--1 O^•1 O M ..C+ G D` CO �l•1 .-1 .-•, r M1 D, w S w o w Q` Ln^M w N O w rn u'1 aD O .•� u'1 S O N W R �D r �D ID co S ctl M1 N O vl M M1 N o, N 'O to C W D� 00 •--1 M M M N pp lD d ^� w Q En w C. .0 L uJ y .4 W d R o T M 4j •.••t a L ..� _ W m W Q H m -� ►+ m W u aFi y >x u 0 +ue 3 < u U ..Vl > o G E aKs m a +�•' N C d N ..-4 D C.... E H �-�.- 7 a W N .o .-2 Iyu] + V M G7 R R W a.VJ p. A at wo0 fJ 6V 7 CL C C A n ..+ p. F 6H1 W +c chi O w.w v] < .j F 3 a .0 •ry 1+ 7+ co a A +� s+ R v u m o + v R a o o al v o F � w •o � a � ai C Fvmv�wwa. avc a C a .n a o �+ z a `" a m 3 x v H � N M .-•1 W O .Lr) OD 0 -4 W C N N a Q* w co C- r-c1) O M M M N 7+ r ^ ^ ^ at m M M .O O .7 � y O O O aGt... C> O o 00 o a S. v 0 C 0 n O 0 Ui � � N � ul L/l -: .D C a C Oo GO+ cO O oce ^ .4 U fAoO 'a a, a-4 c, c� ca cd a I MA Co in a +� X a1 N N N U3� u u rn o caO Er cn Z id + W �y .� at Lao 10+ G +C+ C) r + O y d a7 1+ p O O `0 b > q a m p�,l ..r •--� o r1 M r N O y W ate) G ami w po PL r Ol O r N O O O 4 Is Ino O O -O l r co lo N O O O 1-4 O �� N d aJ p O N N .}C{ C .--1 O N V1 C ^ M N ' M lo r M a M W .O v1 u1 'b al 0 u d d d W G W W w C F a. d tU G' .> G C O O W ai O W H Cal E+ x �. w g Z w H awl L.7 u O CL. 444, w G ca C lu c O h�i OQ. N EO+ U O d O 7 - Q N Z G N G8 �' w V'G 3 L Lned e v — c: c a e to Q a Ya 4 O L 4. N y O rn L � 61 C Y 7 of G N O s cJ T c +r O O 7 G R C � 7 O 7 O C L- jv U2 I C-1 O C3 i L T rn a2 F U3 d � I y � z ; ca - C J L f+ O D' 'O > O E^W i al a/ L _ ysm C..0 V s.W +a cn y rn y d = c rn ao — E: C 7 fat L-I. V N N 00 N N .Pl E. Qj rn + eo a v w .c+ o c s eco --- Q 'TN CVS m O V v ' as i O M d s071 o y m a V V O w G y V c n0 v N 1 N 43 6S. a y d ofLI a! y Y. X a! s.7 E+ N ^CJ J� 4 r- d al L Y S.b QI @ ci 7 y y cam..'. 60* u E'' 0 r-, y .F, fa c y ^-t a O M C �.1 fa: fa a7 >. n u H T 1 C v V O g-- r- c a - ou O m 7 u c a/ o y U o v OI c C C: c a ami W v! O G V ••+ G !d Q m 7 +' "o ►7 c7 V v] 3 O 7 ..7 .0 ..l WW - ff. a E- 14 o rn U ri C• ri N C N N c4 Y• •�1 V m O` C rl N C•l � 0 0 0 0 0 f .1 . ./ c .I In M 'n n M n ' FI Ch t•7 C7 c•'1 a�9 t1 M � C,7 h O T'� r+. Mail CD co to < u 3 c rn n c z m - c v — c s c o c m — -PJ . 4 -- G. C u O H w O. u C �T O • S:. cc G N O o �v c p C a C O' �- cn .3 d ' F oo W p t7 a, d �co rn D~ Z ++ C ro . a co N L X Q] O to Q tQ }+ N L7 Tu [+ i., V! C!1 2 O Lc. 7 A ' y+ O .-.i d w w 03 $.. O 6/ QJ L A' D > o S. W 4 d L ca 2 C..(,yam to [r7 O c 10 to C ' o N m 00 G ( m Qn --+ co d m . Z ca G7 S dC_ O O C -+ d M c0 cn O � co O V W .0 E O O co 1 d N d O w O d 00 c'l E CO u-1 to VN 00 IV tU �1 y cc 03 u u G y Ca H aC7 O N O . E O M O m t7 W E M 45 C!] C C -0 O! In '.O. _ CID m a E adi N .rid N u CU O lu S G t0 • an W A "� C O a < � Y �d Q1 G C O [ter. e7 C u 7 to G W' n dl Q b CJ QE w >. C to --t — to u G A J .tea H u y..� Y� H S+ U a.� y,, y, La . to N -• E u .a v O U G G Kf G O _c V U N O O v C 4 G O C -3 y V to to d V J •"� N O n c, t"1 Q Q C1 � 4 � u ve cH f 00 C a t C Y C O C H d a V 7 Y L C H V 3 O O 0 4 L O O O ClIi H - O L 13. j .n rl C. n a 4 2 U 3C C a C � O 7 + v cn � _w 0 Im m � - yoc) i Wti Z N ' [n H a 4 H m a y j) W O � y .y U O N V H yA wCVLi c w -. U x! E- ` Q1 C .--+ N -0 � O co C 7 MQj C-4 E+ y C � v O O C .0 C> p O Ln 10 O O O O C) 00 d O 00 00 O O .-+ p Cci �. N � .-I �7 1� .--I rl p .. • a v > C C w M N G .0 y V cn ci H a4 C +� wd L [L V cn G a O C E ci z O y a cu CLI V 4 r- 0 u G7 y V — .0 C H �+ C O r W U g ci C .� a O t ai Q O C7 v 3 a C •o La+ N W .4 -.moi V] H 4 C 7 .-., @ O -.0CD -. G: •--7 M C H Y H U a] N H ��+ G .Ni .at 2 G 1�i V y O .0 C 3 3 3 n H 3Y+ t 7 U v W C p u c C c c 3 u a +�-� H o i ~ v ~ to cv to cn` rn c.1 a 91. o a w o tnn N H O H .-1 N cn Jul .O rr L V II'! V e co N co `# C` z .•i D` In t'7 f"I a�1 c n c0 9 b i G� O C c'1 c1 - Cl O a � w F O p 3 rn L eo c O C p p Ct N -a q O p n ID -0O S V C C C un amc:. SA 67 Sal O MO 9 n O q C co c0 w a ca. x I chi i r. aat p o W "[-q. y fn rn i-1 CI.p O G� C > m � �•� ' H w y d a t mcc CO00 W rat 1-4 E� I Cq ro S w0 GO,I Cl Sk. �.�+ o 'o u1 1 C) cn k as 00 d d La C ,Ci y -3 W N y x > O V q O ¢AJ q' a w _ A SA N _ N H W d W E- ami 7 w c y x m ++ n0 > C h ? a 3q+ m C m X ar q c A c w a roa u v w , a, w r: � C C y v < x c Er 9 s, m c - C >r c� .l ►+ >+ a i+ s+ 'd ai N 7 mcs v m y Aci ca In V a w<7 rJ' x •.Ot N C O O M J C J 00 C C Y• C O C 7 Vl W U � Y w C ?+ U 7 Q :! L• G L' fA 1+ •O d L � O •i �1 r m O � V a C atl C 7 O OC �- N V 1 xm � w rn J U ] N r 3 y ty_7 I am+ E t a.+ -. . j Z cn cn ca 7 C � CA wra 6l J H W O co 2G =: r, Cy .- W �-W W H S .•d T �(1 O N M O f. H O .7 M O u'1 �o 00 O t` Cl 1 N H Z w 'O 00 u1 N N lD OI ll l lD 00 �--� D I 9= CD 10U Gs. CD M N 10 00 00 M O 0010 Cr] W W D 1 - sZ4 F N d _ 3 O co C .•-� D` u'1 O N M O ul n M N N V y L E O d HCl '7 O Ln 00 O O M `D .. �7 OJ u'1 N N 17, " M I N O 1 N 10 00 00 Ln O co O rn O �7 .-1 N H w O to cn 6 O +4 x lY+ a+ q 7 i L i 1. m W O L L C at C O U U C W C U d ca•.Ui COO F ,M V .,>vi > o G E �CD m .S..� o ? 'o el W H u ��. Ci a H a W C ai m V O p, -.a .Gj ..� Y Cn N 'b '�O O W 3+ M U >+ H q W a'`i y .•-1 U U .-d O. C U O 'L' '•"� H •.-� .moi C V a y C) 6 c H 0 7 A a0i _ ^-� O -� -•� �~' O 7 T +•+ m F C U y y r, p4. pOy G V A G Z GO. N $ G. Q ..7 d Y S V tr. Z V 41 � V F G .-i H rl -i ri c••1 M O a m— O O o „ �, oo Ij CD z J o ozcn d 10 an 8 Co N a u i Y V 7 •�f V2 Y.'O c•f M r•l c•1 L C N N N h 1► 7 -3 G � U v a 7 D 7 � i O C Ls. y 67 d H ►1 n O 1:3 W i Cir. �rn � D L � C3 N i ami X• d � i� W cn L -,1 N y y H W A . r, 3+ 94 e • o a� a, i+ � •• w V y a l c C n m �w 142 im sa s. yyw Q N� ra F• - ao C .. o o s uAi rn C.7 s. E o a rn rn N T O C m r0i m y �• G +Gi M � 7 c/3ami ,�, a m w ami � > o I.- y o W r d w F y 'a O H G V O d1 m a.. W W O m y b e W am.+ E u ej chi F F o �-Ci � FE- U O a rFi• o 11 LIBRARY PUBLI0110ne 639-9511 12569 SW Main•Tigard, Or.87223 AGENDA March 9, 1981 1. Call to Order 2. Introduction of New Board Member 3. Reports a. Minutes - February 9, 1981 b. Monthly Report for February 1981 C. Friends of the Library Building Committee 4. Old Business a. Loss of Books b. Reciprocal Borrowing - Fees 5. New Business a. WCCLS Tax District i 1 rwaft jc==� ftm PUMCLIBRMY Phone 639-91511 12568 SW (+Juin•Tigard, Or.87223 Tigard Library Board Minutes February 9, 1981 Cali to Order The regular meeting of the Tigard Library Board was called to and Roll Call: order by Chairman Betsy Chick at 7:05 PM. Excused: Jean Carlisle. Reports: Minutes of the previous meeting were approved as circulated. Librarian reviewed the monthly report pointing out that circu- lation was holding despite the reduced hours. Old Business: Madalyn Utz reported that the Downtown Tigard Committee is Building Plans seeking urban renewal funds, but that these funds will not be available for any city buildings. Therefore, she will continue to be on the committee as the library's representative, but the Friends of the Library Building Committee will launch fund raisers independently. The purpose will be t raise the community's awareness as well as funds. It is recognized that the group cannot hope to raise all funding necessary, but it would prepare the community for a possible bond issue. Librarian presented the draft Needs Statement which is being readied for the March 11 meeting of the Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) Citizens Advisory Board. Computerized Librarian reported that the Washington County Commissioners had Circulation Serial decided not to place the WCCLS computerized circulation serial Levy: levy on the ballot in February or March. The Board wrote a letter to the commissioners voicing their concerns and requesting that it be given favorable consideration in May. Copy is attached. Budget FY 81-82: Librarian briefly outlined major requests to be presented to Budget Committee for coming fiscal year. New Business: Loss of Books Librarian reported that book loss is becoming a major problem, not just through overdues, but because of theft. Librarian was directed to check with Board member Jim Sidey (who had been excused earlier) about installing a relatively inexpensive alarm device for the two rear doors. Reciprocal Borrowing: Librarian reported that the number of persons applying for library cards from Multnomah and Yamhill counties is increasing. There has developed a noticeable impact on the already overloaded overdue and reserve systems as well as from the increase in usage by this group. It was also noted that there are borrowers from Clackamas County, but the impact from this group is negligible. In addition, Tigard Public Library enjoys liberal interlibrary loan privileges from Lake Oswego Library as well as inter-connecting courier service between Washington (WCCLS) and Clackamas Counties. Multnomah County charges a $15 fee to out-of-county users and Newberg Library (Yamhill County) charges $4. t Tigard Library Board Minutes - February 9, 1981 - page 2 Motion: Madalyn Utz moved that a fee for out-of-county users, excluding Clackamas County, be established, except for persons who work in Tigard or attend school in Tigard. Motion was seconded and passed. Librarian was instructed to discuss the amount of the fee with the City Administrator and the City finance director and set it accordingly. Meeting adjourned at 8:15 PM. Respectfully submitted, Irene Ertell City Librarian Accepted: Accepted as corrected: nGAH1W LIBRARY FFP I 6309-3511 12568 SMS Main•Tigard, Or.097223 MEMORANDUM March 9, 1981 TO: LIBP-ARY BOARD CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY LIBRARIAN SUBJECT: Monthly Report, February 1981 1. Administration: a. Library Board held its regular meeting on February 9. Minutes are attached. b. Librarian attended Washington County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) pro- fessional board on February 25. Of interest: 1. The Oregon State Library (OSL) is having to cut back services because of budget reductions. This directly affects Tigard Public Library (TPL) because of the numbers of books borrowed on interlibrary loan. TPL also relies on OSL to fill requests for specific information which cannot be handled in the county. 2. There is no chance of WCCLS going on the ballot for a computerized circulation system in 1981. ORS280.090 establishes a two serial levy limit for any one calendar year and Washington County will be submitting two on March 31. The WCCLS Citizens Advisory Board has been discussing other financing options, not only for the computer but for future operating funds as well. The option being consider=d is the formation of a county service district for library services. One of the primary steps in pursuing such a course would be approval by cities who want to be included within the district's boundaries. There was very little discussion because most librarians want to study the issue and present it to their Boards and governing bodies first. 2. Personnel: a. Volunteer hours totaled 166.5 for a daily average of 7.3. b. Community Service volunteers worked a total of 99.5 hours. C. Kathy Tremaine is resigning effective April 30. She is returning to school to earn her bachelor's degree. Personnel search and interviews will be conducted in April with May 15 as the date for a new hire. 3. Statistics: a. Circulation 8043 Books 7523 Magazines 267 Adult 5127 Audio-Visual 155 Juvenile 2396 Other 32 ILL 66 b. User cards 227; in town 93; out-of-town 134. C. Story hour: 104 total; 13 average. d. Materials added 521. e. Materials withdrawn 487. f. Money received: Fines $19.50 Lost Books $32.35 Misc. Replacement $8.05 Donation $.25 Tigard Public Library - Monthiy Report - February 1981 - page 2 4. Youth Services - Kathy Tremaine: February was "LOVE YOUR LIBRARY" month with a giant valentine painted on the window. Exhibits included: Indoor projects for winter months; Chinese New Year bulletin board and oriental book display; a display of folk tales in the YA section. A Chinese New Year party was held during storytime for our pre-schoolers. The entire month was devoted to tall tales in honor of George Washington's famous line, "I cannot tell a lie. ., , °', Patrons were encouraged to let their imagination run wild and submit a fanciful tale on a 3x5 card, to be posted on our liar's board. The winner would receive a gift certificate from the CHALET for a free cherry pie. By the end of the month, only three lies had been submitted; so TPL purchased two additional pies and announced a three-way tie. P_ tall-tale reading was held on one Saturday after- noon, which coincided with the first beautiful Saturday of SPRING -- so our attendance was sharply curtailed (2). The State Children's Consultant, Pat Feehan, visited Washington County this month, conducting an all day workshop for projecting the direction of Children's Library Services in the next five years. She also visited TPL and will be sending information on career- planning books for the YA age group. Young artists from Fowler Junior High School exhibited paintings in the YA room during the month. 5. Friends of the Library: Friends of the Library held their meeting on February 5, at the library. Lester A. Kirkendall, professor .emeritus of Family Life at Oregon State University, was guest speaker. His topic was on parent-child relating. Thirty-one persons were in attendance. Friends of the Library Building Committee met February 2 and 23, at the Library. The group has decided to begin a series of fund raisers to raise community awareness as well as funds for a new library building. They have chosen a slogan: "I'd (�2 a new Tigard Library They have contacted the graphic arts teacher at Fowler Junior High School, whose class will compete to design a logo. Buttons and informational material will bear the slogan and logo. A ilea market is planned for June. The group will continue its participation in the Downtown Tigard Committee as planning continues. February 12, 19611 Soe rd of Commissioners Wasshiugtun County Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Bear A-:0 Lselouers a While we are aware of the aa.-uy problems confCouting the county, we are gre: tly disappointed by your decision not to pierce the: 1&CLS eomputerixcd circulation system on the February or Havch ballots. As concern,•-J citizens of Wash$sagton: ';Ounty, we also wish to express our concern: regarding r Scent reports that you do not raj&L.rd the library system as an "esseuti.-'l service.,, ancb is not our view, and we believe It to slot the view of the majority of the citizens of the county. We went to support .•11 worthwhile objectives of the county, gust as we have in the past. But we feel obligated to voiea our view that the erosions of our roads might mail, In the long terra, be less lWart.-mat th0na the erosion Of the library system. This view Is neither nava nor unprecedented. If s0cm of the acuter problasz faced by the libraries of the county cannot be addressed In F'ebru,,ry or March, so be it. Hotwever$ we urge yenta to conaider 1lowLng the voters of the county to decide these issues swoon. May is later than we might wish, but we hope that you will give consideration to allowing Us to present our caste tbssu. Your* truly, Betsy CbIck, Chairman Tigard Libr•ry board BCIV c.c$ Greg HA th&W&y, Acting county Administrator Dunna Sell*, t.00rdlut tor, WCCLS MONTHLY REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 15, 1981 - MARCH 15, 1981 The following projects were acted on by the Planning Commission over the past month. ZONE CHANGE ZONE CHANGE, ZC 1-81 (CASH'S REALTY B2 & RU-4 TO CP ZONE CHANGE) APPLICANT: Cash's Realty REQUEST: For a Zone Change from Washington County B2 and RU4 to City of Tigard CP "Commercial Professional". SITE LOCATION: The whdle block surrounded by Franklin Street, 66th Avenue, Gonzaga Street, and 67th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 1AA, Tax Lots 6700, 6800, 6900, 7000, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7301) ACTION TAKEN: Approved March 3, 1981 ZONE CHANGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; ZCPD 2-81 and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 1-81 (DAWN'S INLET R-7 TO R-7PD AND SIGNLE FAMILY ATTACHED IN AN R-7 ZONE) APPLICANT: Jon Davis REQUEST: For a Preliminary Plan Review for a Zone Change from City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" to City of Tigard R-7PD "Single Family Residential Planned Unit Development" Zone to build single family homes and a Conditional Use request for a single family attached home on one lot. SITE LOCATION: 11885 SW 113th Place (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 34DC, Tax Lot 3500) ACTION TAKEN: Zone Change Planned Development approved March 3, 1981 Conditional Use withdrawn by applicant COMPREHENSIVE PIAN REVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR 3-81 APPLICANT: Calvin Hamreus (APIGELYNN/HAMREUS R-7 TO A-12) REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard R-7 "Single Family Residential" to A-12 "Multifamily Residential". SITE LOCATION: All lots surrounding SW Angel Place (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 35CD, Tax Lots 2401, 2402, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700) ACTION TAKEN: Tabled March 3, 1981 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION, CPR. 1-81 (WILLOW BROOK/CANTERBURY HEIGHTS DENSITY CHANGE) APPLICANT: Gramco Development Company REQUEST: For a Comprehensive Plan Revision from density of two units per acre to twelve and twenty units per acre. SITE LOCATION: various properties abutting Pacific Highway, SW Naeve Road, and SW 109th Ave. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10A, Tax Lots 4200, 4390, 4402, 4500, 4600 and Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax Lots 500, 600) ACTION TAKEN: Approved March 3, 1981 MONTHLY REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 2 , .. February 15, 1981 - March 15, 1981 r COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CPRPD 2-81 and CONDITIONAL USE, CU 2-81 (EDWARDS INDUSTRIES MEDIUM TO HIGH DENSITY CHANGE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN A C-3 ZONE) APPLICANT: Edwards Industries REQUEST: For a Comprhensive Plan Revision from City of Tigard A-12 Medium Density to A-20PD "Multifamily Residential Urban High Density Planned Development District" to build a home for the aae d. SITE LOCATION: 14240 SW Pacific Highway and lots connecting to the southeast and east (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10A, Tax Lots 302, 400, 501 ACTION TAKEN: Approved March 3,1981 CONDITIONAL USE CONDITIONAL USE, CU 3-81 (MC NIECE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED IN R-7 ZONE) APPLICANT: Neil and Victoria McNiece REQUEST: For a Conditional Use to build single family attached homes in an R-7 "Single Family Residential" Zone. SITE LOCATION: 11835 SW 95th (Wash. Co. Tax biap 1S1 35CD, Tax Lot 2500) ACTION TAKEN: Tabled March 3, 1981 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, ZOA 1-81 (A70/80 HOME FOR THE AGED) APPLICANT: Planning Director/City of Tigard REQUEST: Planning Commission review of a zoning ordinance e5cabiishing certain criteria to be met in the A70/80 Zone. ACTION TAKEN: Planning Commissioners to further review the ordinance March 3, 1981 i r s VISC LVED BURU NGTON NORTHERN SEB 1. 7 1981 ClTy ®F TIGARD Room 1018 176 East Fifth Street INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND St. Paul,Minnesota 55101 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Telephone (612) 298-2121 February 11, 1981 City Clerk City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Sir On July 22 , 1980 Tobey' s Excavaters of Hillsboro, Oregon submitted an application to the Railway Company to install an 8-inch sewer pipeline crossing Oregon Electric right of way and tracks at Tigard, oregor� for the City of Tigard. I am, therefore, enclosing Oregon Electric Permit No. 3616 to the City of Tigard, covering said 8-inch sewer pipeline at the location shown by red line on the print attached thereto and at Tigard, Oregon. This instrument is effective as of January 16 , 1981 at a rental of $200.00 for the first ten year period. - Due to $he fact that advance right of entry was granted the contractors and the pipe is in existence, will you please arrange to have both copies executed by the Mayor of Tigard and attested as City Clerk, after which both copies are to be returned to me together with a check in the amount of $200.00 for completion by the Railway Company. One copy will then be returned for the City's records. e Very truly ,_ rs, J. hT. Recktenwald ease Representative Enc. Pipeline No. OE-3616 THIS AGREEMENT, made this 16th day of January 19 81 between OREGON ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, hereinafter called "Railroad," and CITY OF TIGARD, vvho�e post office address is Tigard, Oregon 97223, hereinafter called"Permittee." WITNESSETH: Railroad, for and in consideration of the fee herein provided to be paid to it by Permittee and of the covenants and premises hereinafter made to be observed and performed by Permittee,does hereby grant to Permittee license and permission to excavate for,construct,maintain and operate an 8—inch sewer pipeline, hereinafter referred to as the"facility,"upon,along or across the right of way of Railroad,underneath the surface'thereof, and under the tracks of its railroad,as the case may be,at or near Tigard Station, in the County of Washington ,State of Oregon to be located as follows,to-wit: At survey station 702 + 93 — Mile Post 33.74 a."shown colored red on the plat hereto attached,marked Exhibit"A",dated December 29, 1980, and by this reference thereto made a part hereof. Permittee in consideration of such license and permission hereby covenants and promises as follows: 1. Permittee will pay in advance to Railroad for this permit the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for the first ten (10) year period and One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each subsequent ten (10) years that this agreement remains in effect, also all taxes and assessments that may be levied or assessed against said facility.Railroad reserves the right to change the said charge at any time while this permit remains in effect upon thirty(30)days written notice.This provision for payment shall in no way restrict Railroad's right of termination under Paragraph 9 hereof. 2. Permittee, at Permittees sole cost and expense, shall excavate for,construct,reconstruct,maintain and repair the facility placing the same in accordance with the specifications provided in application dated July 22, 1980, heretofore approved by the Railroad's Regional Manager Engineering. Permittee shall fill in the excavation, and restore the surface of the ground to its previous condition subject to the approval of the Superintendent of the Division of Railroad upon which the facility is located.Said Superintendent shall have the right at any time when in his judgment it becomes necessary or advisable,to require any material usEd in the work to be replaced with like material or with material of a more permanent character;also to require additional work or change of location of said facility as a matter of safety,or of appearance,or on account of additional tracks being laid,change of grade thereof,construction of a building,or for any other reason whether or not connected with the operation,maintenance,or improvement of the railway of Railroad, all of which shall he done at the expense of Permittee in the manner herein provided. 3. Permittee shall give to the said Superintendent at least two (2) days advance notice of any work to be done by Permittee in the excavation, construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location or removal of the facility,and shall conduct such work in such manner as not to interfere with the maintenance and operation of the railway of Railroad. 4. In the event that Railroad,at the request of Permittee or any agent or contractor of Permittee,or for the protection of its property and operations,does any work,furnishes any material or flagging service,or incurs any expense whatsoever on account of the excavation for,construction,any reconstruction,maintenance,repair,change of location,removal of the facility or otherwise,Permittee shall reimburse Railroad for the cost thereof within twenty(20)days after bills are rendered therefor. If the excavation for construction,any reconstruction,maintenance,repair,change of location,or removal of the facility,requires any or all of the following work:removal and replacement of track,bridging,protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flagging,engineering and/or supervision,such work is to be performed by Railroad employees and the cost borne by Permittee. 5. In the event any cathodic electrolysis or other electrical grounding system is installed in connection with the facility which, in the opinion of Railroad,in any way interferes with any train signals,telephone or telegraph lines,or other facilities of Railroad, Permittee upon being informed by Railroad of such interference shall forthwith discontinue operation of and remove said grounding system,or take such steps as may be necessary to avoid and eliminate all such interference.Permittee further agrees to indemnify and save harmless Railroad from and against any damages,claims,losses,suits or expenses in any manner arising from or growing out of interference with the signals,telephone or telegraph lines of Railroad by the operation, U=or exists.-ce of any such grounding system. 6. Permittee shall and hereby releases and discharges Railroad of and from any and all liability for damage to or destruction of the said facility,and any other property of Permittee located on or near Railroads premises;and shall and hereby assumes any and all liability for injury to or death of any and all persons whomsoever,including officers,employees and agents of the parties hereto,or loss of or damage to property to whomsoever belonging, including property owned by, leased to or in the care,custody and control of the parties hereto,in any manner arising from or during the construction,any reconstruction,use,maintenance,repair or removal of said facility,however such injury,death, loss,damage or destruction aforesaid may occur or be caused;and shall and hereby does indemnify and save harmless Railroad of and from any and all claims,demands,suits,actions,damages,recoveries,judgments,costs or excenses arising or growing out of or in connection with any such injury,death,loss,damage or destruction aforesaid.Permittee further agrees to appear and defend in the name of Railroad any suits or actions at law brought against it on account of any such personal injuries, death or damage to property,and to pay and satisfy any final judgment that may be rendered against the Railroad in any such suit or action.The liability assumed by Permittee herein shall not be affected or diminished by the fact, if it be a fact,that any such suit or action brought against Railroad may arise out of negligence of Railroad,its officers,agents,servants or employees,or be contributed to by such negligence. 7. Permittee shall not transfer or assign this permit without the written consent of Railroad. 8. Nothing herein contained shall imply or import a covenant on the part of Railroad for quiet enjoyment. 9. It is expressly understood and agreed that Railroad may at any time cancel and terminate this license and permission by giving to Permittee thirty (30)days notice in writing of its intention to cancel the same and at the expiration of such notice this license and permission shall terminate.Upon receipt of such notice and before the expiration thereof,Permittee, under the supervision and direction of the said Superintendent, or his authorized representative,shall remove the facility from the right of way of Railroad and restore the right of way and premises of Railroad in a manner and to such condition as shall be satisfacto:y to the said Superintendent of Railroad. If Permittee shall fail to remove the facility and restore the said right of way to such condition within said thirty(30)day period,Railroad at its option may remove the same and restore the said right of way to its previous condition,and Permittee shall pay the,cost and expense thereof to Railroad. \ U J o ted D cli Z ti cc: •�+ < UJ f— ozi P• �► z Ouw � bsa ppb _ C=a R • pf?t F��� �. ' � •, 11•fir rGay $ OA )o c rp `co Ke Lon`19-l` S� q w 6 ------ O W 4 0� we ' of — • '6/.!9 odr� % wr9_ZL SO •RGf 9!-d't�r � a frail v/�rijltl,J Ls�GG9 ti ' �•�o Z1 H L9Z-9VON ad Y7 Jn /0- =bL'££d'`Y=£64 ZOL ur50 aatC n7. xVFA 9RZ-9G'oN - -_=�--��.+.--.�•--- ,�`� bt!�,r v./w.ar./d OZ-Z9�SOL d ,aot�S u0$ '0MOO,R— E ii"11 ir.e.o a iwl�i�i•��s k , i '� ' isrrX ®Ivarr� 8'S+L OL aas_QE� ": {.no,yp,al 3683-8�.'ON 12 f Oros-� � I } , /e..r ss.✓4,1�/"°�'°°",�7�1P�91-`H'/a•""'''.1 r6Eq� I X jr • S i i . 41� f W 61r9VvYe"`7^''d .�!ye�s+!D:tgw.wA/.,r<.,...•�/ IRS + 10. Upon any failure of Permittee punctually and strictly to observe and perform the covenants and promises made herein by Permittee to be kept and performed,Railroad may terminate this agreement on ten(10)days notice to Permittee, remove the facility,and restore the right of way to its previous condition at the cost and expense of Permittee. 11. Any notices given under the provisions of this agreement shall be good if deposited postpaid in a United States post office addressed to Permittee at Permittee's post office address above stated or as ctherwi,e directed by Permittee. 12. The license and permission herein granted is subject to permits,leases and licenses,if any,heretofore granted by Railroad affecting the premises upon which said facility is located. Subject to the foregoing provisions,this agreement and all of the covenants and promises thereof,shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto,their respective executors,administrators,successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Railroad and Permittee have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. In Presence of: OREGON ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY By General M—gor—L.-- CITY OF TIGARD By Mayor Attest: City Clerk FORM 60025 1-70 CITY OF TIG ARD. OREGON' PROCLAMATION WHEREAS , the health , safety , and well-being of the citizens of the State of Oregon depends in a large part on the integrity of all the buildings and occupied structures throughout our state . WHEREAS , the structural integrity , fire safety , energy performance , access by the handicapped , and overall utility of our buildings is dependent upon the diligent efforts of building and fire code personnel throughout our state . WHEREAS , the efforts of code personnel are deserving of public recognition and support as the importance of con- tinued safety in our buildings and structures cannot be over emphasized. NOW, THEREFORE, as ,layor, I hereby proclaim the week of April 5 - 11 , 1951 as "BUILDING SAFETY WEEK" in Tigard. I encourage Oregonians to utilize this time to familiarize themselves with the important safety information and services available through these public servants . IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set illy hand and causes the seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed . Mayor - City of Tigard , Oregon r;- Wilbur Bishop, Mayor March 17, 1981 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, Ore 97223 Dear Mayor Bishop: A very valuable Tigard resource--the south and west side of Little Bull Mountain with its stands of timber which help keep Tigard' s air clean and which are important to the environment and livability of the Tigard area will be lost if you approve the request to change the Comprehensive Plan from low density single family residences and allow 12 to 20 multiple housing development that has been requested. I understand there is pressure from the staff of LCDC and that this has pursuaded your planning staff and the Planning Commission that such action is required to meet quotos that LCDC staff has set. And while I am sure that the intent of the LCDC staff is to preserve Oregon agriculture land and this is valid, it should not be done at the expense of the environment of the cities . Such action is short- sighted and destructive to cities like Tigard, which must see that its natural resources are not destroyed and that things .within the cities that need preserving are preserved. And, I do not believe such destruction is the intent of LCDC Commission members. They have not acted on this directive from the LCDC staff, and when they do, I am sure they will take into consid- eration the preservation of designated natural features already existing in the Comprehensive Plan (such as Little Bull Mountain. ) Little Bull Mountain' s south and west side is presently desig- nated as "one of the natural features that give Tigard a distinctive character and quality. " The Plan goes on to specify that suburban low density zoning " "is necessary in these areas due to the following features : A. Slope acrd soil conditions are not suited to higher density development with resultant road cuts and building excavations . B. Substantial amounts of timber would be lost if developed at a higher density. C. These wooded slopes provide an outstandIng natural eature oF considerable scenic value to the residents o igard. To denude and densely dev- elop t em would be a considerable loss to the commune y more 2- All of the property owners who are residents and live on the south and west slopes of Little Bull Mountain want theFow density designation retained. Only non-residents and developers are willing to sacrifice Tigard' s trees, its environment and its liveability. Annex those who want to be annexed, if you wish, but leave the Comprehensive Plan as it is until the LCDC Commission has a chance to review their staffs' position and its implications . Once you open the door to multiple housing on the south and west slopes of Little Bull Mountain, the destruction of all the trees will soon follow, and Tigard will have lost an invaluable resource that can never be replaced. ou B. A. Barney McPhillips 15100 SW 109th Tigard, Ore. , 97223 Petition to Tigard City Council We, the undersigned, being property owners , or residents of Little Bull Mountain, or residents of the immediate affected vicinity, petition the Tigard City Council to deny any change in the designated Suburban Low Density Zoning presently called for in the NPC 6 Plan and in the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City, for the South and West side of Little Bull Mountain. We believe Little Bull Mountain is an invaluable environmental resource to Tigard; that any increase in density on the steep slopes would create impossible problems ; that the increased traffic in the surrounding residential areas would be intolerable ; and that the integrity and the liveability of the whole neighborhood would be adversly affected by allowing the Suburban Low Density Single Family Zoning on the South and West side of Little Bull Mountain to be changed. Signed Address 4�-'00 wi- j 2�z je A, Zvi 0 &4W / X030 S W• /047 4 S. ®s e LAJ 4e-S - r "°� Li• ' F ��I"���`S SPS �� � � s� eoodp kat /t eW CIL r 61, low� amw /,V?*, -r,, j'7K21 J .. Oil r 'lj i�l 1 �d Petition to Tigard City Council We, the undersigned, being property owners , or residents of Little r-- Bull Mountain, or residents of the immediate affected vicinity, petition the Tigard City Council to deny any change in the designated Suburban Low ,Density Zoning presently called for in the NPO b Plan and in the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City, for the South and West side of Little Bull Mountain. We believe Little Bull Mountain is an invaluable environmental resource to Tigard; that any increase in density on the steep slopes would create impossible problems ; that the increased traffic in the surrounding residential areas would be intolerable; and that the integrity and the liveability of the whole neighborhood would be adversly affected by allowing the Suburban Low Density Single Family Zoning on the South and West side of Little Bull Mountain to be changed. Signed Address c"o i f' J O -n �L l � L- i f^e i4 `I U�►'L - / /'tf� y _ •,r,T, y y. - j '.J ,. i ti .i�..L.•.'�q L�,..I�, LA �,y,,E.,.. ` ,e'. , • .f .'4,-j;{ Cie`r'n'"L—irij'r•/r,�.'(.�,!.C,�..i:rf r �• p �f //��)''//��// :jt •� .. t .. � .�z � Vii: ... i _ v amu• �- �, _. �,,,.�,.. � .. Y t "--� ... _ ol MIMI 11111 I'll lll� ,o Sf. ;,._en-.a-q:iS/zD�pq--� _ ,r-..,r��--ia�_„L: ._ � ;?r..y �_:. "-?T' - . :_•.vr.- .. .. - •F-- et f6rc 2W 1�ayoffs E ,• :r` _ , bud . ' • -' . -. :... ::� - :.: get, the cuts were expected to exactly.tbe same amount of funds' next:• Y follow closely the target figures he es- year as this year(essentiall a ltl Muiltttomale.Coriaty'Bxecutive ion Y per-: ; tabilshed.tor managers of five costly cent reduction because of inflationary C _will "reFucianYly"'submit to the: saioners Tues­' Programs when they submitted Pressures), and a second budget sh Cotaaty.CoFnmiow-: , budget requests to him earlier this Ing a 9 percent increase.In most $ cases_: :� 41991- todget containing - th.-. f aGma,, - even the latter,.would not maintain cut..:•; flH'rcute th would ; ._: The target figures called for a $I rent levels of sense,Clark said. meacx 1 „af reboot eonaty em- Ston reduction laa Project Health, Ya, =w ia r I� the Moreover, Clark`said the-county T `816 4 ty ;��s PM9ram of prepaid health care• road fund wi11 face a g2 million deficit ' e poor:it $1.5 million cut In the next year if it tries to continue road: ' >;t..? rn�tratifla will iwk the board to begin .ptvIsion of Community health Services, maintenance at existing levels because s :mPPtha.t:l” package of revenue pro existing,•which runs county medical and dental there bas been no growth in the gash.- that tarok soften the impact of the_ -clinicrs. and visltluj nurse services; a line tax revenues that support it n,.;ieudget cuts.T'he key element of that!: $1.5 million cut in the allocation for the Still uncertain was the effect Presj< @ a` 'X "lam 14fultnomah County'Public Library; a dent Reagan's federal budget proposals Yearnerai'purpose sena! levy Pkat =I:8 million cut in the sheriff's de g P PosaTs ' �wil$'Fse submitted to voters at lite Pte. in the areas of health and social services; �Y, ment;'and a$1 million cut in the com- might have on the county budget if they, v al election.to'tide the:cilonty blued,budgets of the district and circuit are approved by Congress. Clark said apesf ' over_until d9 facraaere cae_6e x a_ ^ '_ federal cuts could. reduce county pro=: - ' voted oil In tY 6 se = LST gratas.In::the*Department {� �'he tisx �Clar recommended no,major acts partment of Hnmsn :- 5 creased slnee-I$S6 ;�,•:- ��r = fit a sixth.costly Program—that of the Services by as muni as $4 million.Re- The-beard-also 4ii be ssk�tip,����`CoziectEons Division—because of critI= su Its of an analysis by the department :- 8 OP thg county's es�t[ng pemuY a- a cal problems It.faces In reducing ;ail 'director, Tom Higgins, are expected` 2 g + early next week,Clark said. gasoline Za8 and to approve as fnexea€e'.:�populations and in continuing cnmmnnl= ,- . Clark-said he has discussed , .- !a the .county's- bfaoss Income-'-'ty. corrections Programs next year in potentia! b ;..tax fitrm:t 'ge ;lrf{$ g;';�` the face of dwladlIctg state support and layoffs with leaders of all majorcounty 8PLved by the bcrd, both measures ,. Influx of sate prisoners into countyemployees unions,and he believes they s.would be su ,ta boli:".� jet aL f * � ' understand the caunty's fiscal plight, ,,. , "Th want to see v r•4+ hough':Clarkssr�efd to disclose {All other comity program tnanagers 'of revenue options_anr�they reviews ;dermic cf the Cute jail tVogId ben ��Lw F. b..,, el iuc In[Br e }, t� 4-0—the-.1981-82, ••• ••••••"�vasa oumgec snow ested ict minimizing the impact on tben general..''ft what uld happen of they received members;'*'lark said �. ? 3�a'�L��� �� P`5,.:�.3a•-- ;.�� y^� ...y... �•y} _,. xr. ..xt ;,k •- �! ) f� .r ' ti Ap�'•y�+� .ii< r,t._ .. t�,_ s,x-a,��' - YY �•�h _ _—.Z-- _....r _,;y.� ... . ..' � :k y,,,!"�st'���i�.R�..+���5�*R�ci.rwtl��.=`?r�^.S•� �-. a��l. .,� �'�' a t ,t:; �' '•`��7 i^ -.. rte.-^t���t `i s..�.:..=sem•. i� .,.:�,..».:..::t��•�S...L�to-� .�•:��•�.��;:�:•.-�-��= � � .;.�,,,.,,jjf •� -� :.r _ .:•- •+ ...v...,...r..... s.-... ;'.mss s,,,.a:, �' 31 560 PART 7 DOMESTIC PROBLEMS / �� r + a. employed successfully in a number of cities in the richer,we not only purchase more goods and services United States and Europe. They are likely to gain from the private sector, but we also increase our de- large-scale adoption in the coming years. mands on the public sector. :. Y' . 2. Subeldles These can be used to reorient bus ser- 2. To meet these demands, urban governments have vices in the inner cities.Various studies indicate that to increase their expenditures on virtually all types of present bus systems often do not provide adequate public services. These include sanitation, police and connection and transfer points to meet the needs of fire protection,education,health,welfare,transporta- the working poor—especially those who must com- tion, recreation, and cultural facilities. elute by bus to work in the suburbs. . 3. While cities have been Ieft to grapple with soaring 3. Taxicab and jitney Services These can be ex- municipal costs,the groups that pay the heaviest share panded.Merely by relaxing somewhat the restrictions of taxes—business firms and middle-income fami- which almost all cities exercise on the supply of taxis, lies—have for decades been moving to the suburbs. their number could be increased and the rates re- These groups have been replaced by an ever-expand- duced. And by permitting the use of jitneys—that is, ing population of the poor, who need but cannot af- cars or station wagons which carry passengers at ford the more expensive education, welfare, health nominal rates over a regular route (a very common services, and other public benefits. form of public transportation in many foreign and in These conditions have forced most cities to face a some American cities)—much of the problem of auto- mobile co estion in the cities would be eliminated. growing fiscal problem. To raise the revenue needed to pay for public services, taxes must be increased. :•;: However, taxes in the cities are already burdensome. CONCL "'' and further increases may onlyhasten the exodus of "TRANSPORT AN EFFICIENT and businesses to nearby suburbs,where taxes "TYtAt4I$PC1RT MI7C" people Y and other amenities are more favorable. The cities can do a great deal at relatively little cost to Most cities have frequently had deficits amounting relieve the transportation pressures they now face. to many millions of dollars—deficits which they cov- Ypsrime.^.t4ti:,a,:: u reg: ar�d flexible approaches is ered by dipping into reserves, by borrowing against needed to find an efficient"transport mix"—one suited future budgets, and by selling long-term notes. Not to the special requirements of each city. The money since the depression of the 1930s, however, has the that can be saved from optimum use of a well-de- plight of many city treasuries been as bleak as in re- signed transportation system might better be spent on cent years. _` ' education, housing, pollution abatement, and other How should the various levels of government direct measures that will make the city a more desirable their limited resources to combat poverty,crime,pol-._ ` place to live.(See Box 2.) lution,eyesores,and ghetto unemployment,while im j proving education, housing, mass transit, and the :. . other amenities of a better urban America?The solu=. a tion rests on finding more effective ways of raising~ Financing cing Local Government:' revenues while improving the efficiency of local gov- Our Urban Fiscal Dilemma ernment.Several proposals for achieving these objec fives may be considered: Any discussion of urban policies must eventually deal 1. Minimize fiscal disparities. with the difficult problem of financing public services. 2. Utilize revenue sharing. u;} Why does a problem exist?Mr.Micawber in the novel 3. Impose user charges. David Copperfield described a situation that epito- mizes the financial squeeze which many of our cities 4. Restructure the property tax. are experiencing today 5. Establish metropolitan government. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure A broad approach to financing urban government nineteen six:result,happiness. should draw on all these proposals. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six:result,misery. MINIMIZE FISCAL DISPARITIES This is indeed the essence of America's urban fiscal dilemma. The reasons for it can be summarized Cities provide many goods and services whose ben briefly: efits and costs are not appropriately apportioned. 1. As our population expands and our economy grows People benefit in varying degrees from the expendi=' 582 PART 7 DOMESTIC PROBLEMS n tures of local governments, and they pay in varying welfare, and social security programs. If a larger\por- degrees for the values they receive.But the disparities tion of the costs of these local activities could be between costs and benefits may be wide because.the transferred to Washington, many of the spillover.ef- people who work in the city and the people who visit fects would be greatly reduced or eliminated and the the city are not always the same people as the taxpay- city governments would be relieved of enormous tax ers who awn property or live in the city.As a result of responsibilities. these misalignments,there tend to be wide differences not only in the taxable bases and expenditure re quirements of the more than 80,000 local governmen- tal units in the United States,but also in the quantity UTILIZE REVENUE SHARING y and quality of services provided by these units. An approach for relieving the mounting fiscal prey- �: sures facing states and cities is for the federal govern- " Spillover Effects ment to engage.in revenue shoring. Such a plan re' The divergencies of costs and benefits have created quires that the federal government automatically turn extensive "spillover" effects among a wide array of over a portion of its tax revenues to state and )ocal urban government expenditures. These range from governments each year. The justification for this is health, education, and welfare services to environ- based on certain fundamental facts and relationships amental control.Two examples of the many"spillover" involving both revenues and expenditures. effects may be given. ,9 First, the federal government collects most of the ' taxes levied;state and local governments collect a rel- 1. The mounting education and welfare budgets of atively minor proportion. The federal government's most major cities have been due in large part to our chief source of revenue is the income tax. Because of national agricultural policy.In recent decades,Wash- its progressive rate structure, the tax yields approxi- ington has promoted the subsidization and mechani- . . Iffim zation of the South's cmately a 1.5 percent increase and tobacco fields,driving ncrease in revenues for every 1 out millions of workers,who have then streamed into percent increase in the nation's total output of final the cities looking for jobs. Most of these people are goods and services—its gross national product (GNP). II The state and local governments, on the other hand, poor. unskilled, and usually illiterate. Hence, they �_--aeeat Luu _ receive the g _-„an of their reV2nues from properiy, have either become public charges or at best have sales,and other taxes.These tend to increase by about been able to find menial employment at the minimum wage..Meanwhile, many of the "expatriates"—the 1 percent for every 1 percent increase in GNP. former residents of the cities—continue to work in the Second, state and local spending has been increas- cities and hold the higher-paying jobs while turning ing at rates of about 7 percent to 10 percent per year — over the bulk of their tax'bills to the suburban mu- roughly twice as fast as the growth in GNP. At the nicipalities in which they reside. same time, state and local governments have met_ growing public resistance to increases in taxes, the 2. In the area of environmental control, it was once imposition of new taxes,and the sale of bonds—these. thought that air and water pollution were strictly local being the only methods available to finance rising problems peculiar to a few cities.But now it is recog- municipal expenditures. Federal government spend= nized that geographic boundaries in such matters are ing,on the other hand(except for extraordinary mili- largely irrelevant and that the issues are of national or tary needs), may tend to rise less than federal reve= even international concern. Canadian residents, for nues when the economy is expanding,thereby leaving_ example,have filed suits in U.S.federal courts against a fiscal dividend. American firms for contaminating the air over Can- According to the revenue-sharing advocates, the ada. salvation of states and cities lies in sharing the fiscal In these and many other situations, the disparities dividend. Of course, the federal government has long between costs and benefits should be minimized.The poured out money to states and localities,but this has most effective way to accomplish this is for the federal been largely in the form of grants-in-aid for specific government to absorb a much larger share of the fi- programs to which Washington attaches many nancial burden. At the present time, state and local bureaucratic strings and controls.What the governors governments pay almost all the costs of public safety, and mayors want is a kind of philosophical Jefferson- transportation (except highways), elementary and ianism. This is an arrangement whereby the federal secondary education, water supply and treatment, government gives out blocks of-grants for broad gen- parks and recreation,and garbage collection. In addi- eral purposes while allowing all or most of the spend- tion, they pay a substantial part of the costs of health, ing decisions to be made at state and local levels. In MM®��..aajjft.�c�_S �a,.a.P1:•a+. c$+>ws:ua'�"a.' "''v..: �.a.;a.-e-:. ^P.. Chapter 32 Urban Problems 563 :s�vay,by sharing a percentage of its revenues on a User charges have a number of advantages.Among :fixed basis with hard-pressed states and cities, the the more important are these: .federal government can encourage much greater local 1. They enable the municipal government to know the ,initiative. value of its services to its users. 2. They reduce benefit spillovers resulting from geo Revenue sharing was approved by Washington in - 1972. Although*state and local government leaders graphic-differences. 4often complain that the program is inadequate and 3. They permit greater efficiency of production, less zhas not been consistently implemented,there is wide- oversupply of services: and larger total revenues than j.spread agreement that revenue sharing in general has would occur with tax financing. 'been successful. But user charges also have at least two closely related limitations.First,they are inappropriate for financing 'N AiPOSE USER CHARGES "public goods"—goods whose benefits are available to everyone—such as clean streets, traffic lights, and ' public safety. Second, they are difficult to apply Local governments obtain their revenues from various where specific benefits to users are hard to identify ["sources.These include taxation,•license fees, interest a earnings, special assessments, sale of property, and measure. I charges for municipal services, and so on. The last . item,often called"user charges;'offers promising op- 4portunities for additional revenues. RESTRUCTURE THE PROPERTY TAX V. At present,many people receive the benefits of city 'hospitals, public housing, treated water, mass transit, A fourth approach to improving the finances of local refuse collection, and public schools. Many people governments is to revise the existing structure of the $'also help support part of the costs of these locally property tax.This tax,with its diverse rates and bases, -ovided services through special payments, rents, is imposed only at the state and local levels,not at the ."d fees, as well as through taxation. The issue is federal level.Although local governments have other whether the cities should revise their systems of user sources of revenue, such as sales and excise taxes,_ Karo for t}1PCP cor�»�oa, and :":hether il:ey should USK& y c.__..es o_ income taxes, utility revenue, and liquor store reve- charge for services which are presently financed out nue,the property tax is nevertheless their largest sin - tof.tax revenues. gle source of funds.This tax helps pay the local share '6 The answer to both questions is yes—for several of school costs as well as a large part of the expenses . . _reasons: incurred for public safety, sanitation, street lighting, First,a revision of user charges is based on the rec- and the bulk of other community services.. '_ •: Respite its widespread use,the property tax suffers Y types ognition that if certain es of services are available too cheaply or at flat rates,their limited supply will be , from a number of shortcomings. Three are particu- 4 rationed by congestion whenever the quantity de- .- larly important. ' 7manded exceeds the quantity supplied at the existing 1. It requires tax assessors to"guess"the market value . price.As we mentioned earlier,mass-transit facilities during rush hours serve as striking illustrations. In of taxable property. This is because the true market -=such cases a differential pricing structure rather than value cannot be known unless the property is sold.As Y`a single price would not only provide a better ration- a result, wide differentials and inequities of assess- - 1. g ment exist both within and between districts. ing mechanism,but would provide a larger total reve- ll. 2. The tax is extremely regressive. It bears ,,nue as wedown Second, by imposing charges on certain services much harder on poorer families than richer ones be are currently financed entirely from tax reve- cause housing is such a large part-of consumer•spend- Inues, and by varying the charges according to their ing for lower-income groups. the control of land 'fuse, a more efficient utilization of resources and a 3. It causes`"fiscal zoning"—that is, :greater volume of total revenue can be realized.Pub- use in order to maximize the tax base.For example,it r lic libraries and marinas provide typical examples. encourages laws requiring large minimum lot sizes, '•e services of these facilities are usually offered free thereby raising land costs and discouraging the con- at little cost to residents of the suburbs as well as struction of smaller homes for moderate-income fam- jhe citiescq� .Because the poor make relatively less use of flies. these amenities, the overall effect is for middle-in These and other factors make the property tax one come households to be subsidized in large measure of the most controversial in the entire tax structure. ''from taxes paid by low-income groups. lam » 564 PART 7 DOMESTIC PROBLEMS £' .Nevertheless, it continues to exist, partly because it ESTABLISH METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT raises so much revenue and partly because it is the major tax which local governments are permitted by A fifth means of coping with the challenges facing their states to levy. local governments is one which realizes the need for - regional attacks on pressing urban problems.This ap- The Land Value Tax preach is as much political as economic.It is based on the recognition that local government authority in This many bad economic effects of the property tax most metropolitan areas is too fragmented to provide have resulted in various proposals for its revision.The for overall balanced systems of land use, tran;norta- most desirable and feasible way to correct its deft- tion, public health, and the like. For exam 1 -tan ciencies would be to restructure it in favor of a land large urban areas, such as Chicago, New York, Phila- value tax. This is a tax on bare sites exclusive of delphia, and Pittsburgh,have considerably more than buildings that stand on them. This idea was first pro- 500 local governmental units each.The effects of such posed by.the American economist Henry George in prelif?ration are fiscal di�plicztion., administrative in- ,. his book. Progress and Poverty (1879). But unlike efficiency,and suburban separatism,which hurts mi- George,who advocated a tax on land as a"single tax" nority groups. to replace all others, it is suggested here as a partial To help correct these deficiencies, some form of but substantial substitute for the property tax. consolidation is needed. One of the more feasible The fundamental idea is to tax the annual unearned possibilities is to set up a "two-tier"system of metro- gains from land.This is the economic rent or surplus that accrues.to the owners of land not because of im- politan government in urban regions. Such a system could consist of an area government and local gov- provements•they have made upon it but because of errments,with functions assigned to each.At the area community, development and population growth level, the functions assigned could be those which which have caused the market value of land to rise. have broad overla Ing interests or which offer ad- Three chief arguments are advanced in favor of such a pp tax. vantages of economies of scale. Examples are plan- ning, zoning, water supply, sewage disposal, trans- L It disc:.Irages land from being held out of produc portation, and public health. At the local levels, tive use. community governments could administer their oNvn 2. It encourages the building of structures on the land. police departments,fire services,and education.Some 3. It returns to society the increases in the value of functions, of course, could also be shared at both land resulting from economic growth. levels,where it is advantageous to do so. The major criticism of the tax is that it is difficult to There are three major advantages to such a plan.i administer. This is because it cannot distinguish be- 1. Efficiency would be increased by consolidating tween increases in the value of land resulting from some of the functions of smaller governmental units._ eebnomic growth and increases due to improvements ``?` made on the Iand. . 2. Governmental units at all levels would become, more responsive to human needs and preferences as Even though this criticism is valid, its adverse ef- a' fects can certainly be mitigated through appropriate result ci decentralizing some of the functions of the larger cities. tax laws. Experience in other countries which make use of land value taxation, including mixed econo- 3. The relationship of local governmental units to the mies such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, states and federal government would be strengthened indicates that such laws are feasible and workable. by a more rational allocation of functions among the At present,the property tax in the United States is rela- various levees. tively light on land and heavy on buildings. Hence, the Metropolitan government has been adopted in'. tax favors landowners,who tend to be in the higher-in- varying degrees by some cities in the United States come groups, and speculators, who find it more profit- and Canada. But most local officials oppose the idea able to hold land for future resale than to build upon it. because they fear the loss of power.Consequently,the By restructuring the property tax so that it bears down majority of states have been reluctant to pass the nec- relatively heavier on land than on buildings,these unde- essary enabling legislation. Ideally, if Washington sirable effects would be greatly reduced without causing would expand the program of grants which it already revenue losses to local governments. In fact, various provides for some regional activities, it could offer studies have concluded that a land value tax which av- additional incen!ives to the states and local govern-- erages about 5 percent nationally would yield the same ments by rewarding them financially if they initiate total revenue that is now produced by property taxes on plans for the establishment of some form of metro_: land and buildings. politan government. _ . R Y Jill NEINEM i of Avoid Verbal. Messages ' CITY OF TIGARD To: From: Subject: ru r r 7, n, _, _ Date:_ — T r;pjsrz—d i.ivit t et5rmary 9, Please invests.-ate and, havc recoru;;�ndaticn ready for Ge4*�� Council meeting' 3 Ai,:ercian Le,"-on most 415`, 1i5:: Si i'acific Hwy- PO ,ox 234"2 Ore�lon 97/22-3 Type (f.-L: nppl lcn tlof' : DBA TIGARD LOAVES & FISHES SENIOR CENTER ESTMINATED OPERATING BUDGET JULY 1981 - JUNE 1982 EXPENSES Personnel Costs : Center Manager @ 5. 75 Hr. $ 15 , 357 Assistant Manager @ 4.25 Hr. (6 Mo. ) @ 4. 50 Hr. (6 Mo. ) 11 ,290 Caterpersons @ 4.46 Hr. 6, 849 Outreach Worker @ 3. 35 Hr. 4.,041 Information & Referral Worker @ 3. 35 Hr. 3,597 Janitorial @ 3.35 Hr. 8,082 Total Personnel Costs $ 49 ,216 Materials and Services: Meals @ 1.61 35,903 Center Purchased food 558 Consumable Supplies 335 Janitorial Supplies 500 Utilities & Janitorial Services 1,010 Office Supplies & Postage 375 Telephones 1,785 Equipment Maintenance 250 Small Equipment 100 Fund Raising Costs 1 ,250 Recreation Supplies 250 Mileage @ 20¢/mile 1,645 Central Project Operations cost 7,683 Project Administration 3,843 Training 73 Total Materials And Services $ 55 ,560 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 104, 776 INCOME Membership Drive 3, 828 Gifts, Pledges & Donations 2,500 Center Project Income 3,000 City of Kin-4 City 1,000 City of Tigard 10 ,000 Green Thumb • . 8 ,082 Congregate Meal Donations 18,963 Hor . De' ivered Meal Donations 10 ,032 _tle 'II , Older Americans Act 35,750 L 3. rept. of Agriculture 10,871 Misc. Income . 750 TOTAL INCOME $ 104, 776 $ 1.04, 776 TIGARD LOAVES & FISHES SENIOR CENTER ESTIMATED OPERATING BUDGET JULY 1981 - .SUNK; 1982 BUDGET NOTES 1 ) PROJECTED MEALS TO BE SERVED: Congregate meals 14 , 114 Homo. Delivered moal s 7,600 Total 60+ meals 21 , 714 Other -60 meals 586 Total meals to be served 22 , :300 2 ) Title III funds and U. S. Dent . cif Agriculture funds are estimated based on previous experience. In March or April 1981 the allocation level of the Tigard Center should be available. 3) Funding from King City and Tigard are estimated. 4) Ileal donations are estimated based on historical information . 5) Janitorial services performed by Green Thumb will require the Center to secure one additional 20 hour/week position from ('seen Th umb_ 6) Utilities have been estimated by the building architect . AGREEMENT The parties to this Agreement are Loaves & Fishes Centers , Inc. , an Oregon, nonprofit corporation , by and through Tigard Loaves & Fishes Senior Center, hereafter "Loaves & Fishes , " and the City of Tigard, an Oregon municipal corporation , hereafter "City. " This Agreement is made and entered into between these parties on the date of the latest of the signatures at the foot of this document . The purpose of this Agreement is to enable Loaves &- Fishes to provide services for seniors including but not limited to meals, transportation, outreach , health screening, information and referral, recreation, using the facilities and equipment of the City ' s Tigard Senior Center Building and to set forth the mutual understanding of the parties as to the rights and obliga- tions of the parties with respect to the use of the building. 1. Operations and Equipment. (a) Furnishings and routine maintenance. Certain furnishings, equipment and decorations have been provided pursuant to the terms of the construction contract under which the Senior Center has been built . Loaves & Fishes shall provide such additional furnishings , equipment and decora- tions as may be necessary to the conduct of its services, and the City shall have no further obligation to provide such materials. Loaves & Fishes shad also be responsible for the repair and maintenance of furnishings and equipment , and shall provide janitorial services for the operation of the building. It shall further be the obligation of Loaves & Fishes to keep the kitchen and diming areas clean, in such a way as to meet the standards of the State of Oregon and the Washington County Health Department. (b) Flours of operation. Loaves & Fishes shall operate the building in such a way as to keep it open to seniors not less than 35 hours per week. Loaves & Fishes shall schedule all uses of the building and establish fees for such use: services for senior citizens shall have first priority; official meetings of the City shall have second priority; other uses shall have third priority. (c) Grounds and structural repairs. The City shall be responsible for the repair of sidewalks , driveways, service ares, curbs, and parking areas, and shall provide garbage service for the Center. The City shall also see that the grounds , including lawn and any other landscape features , t are maintained. The City shall also be responsible for making any structural repairs to the building itself, and shall be responsible for such maintenance functions as painting, woodwork repair, main- tenance of heating ventilation air conditioning systems and hot water plumbing, replacement of lighting, and other similar work. Neither party shall make structural changes or install new equipment requiring : structural changes without the approval of the other, 2. Financial- Obligations. (a) Insurance. The City shall provide liability insurance in an amount not less than the applicable limits of tort liability for public bodies pursuant to the Oregon Tort Claims- Act . Each party shall Agreement - Page 2 carry the other as an additional named insured on their respective liability policies . The City shall provide fire insurance in an amount not less than the appraised value of the structure . Loaves & Fishes shall provide fire insurance in an amount not less than the appraised value of the contents. The City may at any time secure its own appraisal of the building and contents for the Purpuse of reviewing the adequacy of the fire insurance then in force. (b` Utilities. Loaves & Fishes shall pay the utility bills , including the telephone bill. (c) Licenses and permits. Loaves & Fishes shall be responsible for all licenses and permits which may be required in the administration of Loaves & t Fishes services at the Center. 3. Duration of Agreement . This Agreement shall remain in force for one year periods, and at the end of each year Loaves & Fishes shall have the right to renew it for an additional year. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands upon the dates indicated by each of the signatures below. TIGARD LOAVES & FISHES CITY OF TIGARD SENIOR CENTER By: By: Steering Committee Chairperson Mayor LOAVES & FISHES CENTERS, INC. By; By: Executive Director City Recorder Date: Date : Agreement - page 3 4 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the health, safety, and well-being of the citizens of the State of Oregon depends in a large part on the integrity of all the buildings and occupied structures throughout our state . WHEREAS. the structural integrity, fire safety, energy performance , access by the handicapped, and overall utility of our buildings is dependent upon the diligent efforts of building and fire code personnel throughout our state . WHEREAS, the efforts of code personnel are deserving of public recognition and support as the importance of con- tinued safety in our buildings and structures cannot be over emphasized. NOW, THEREFORE, as Mayor, I hereby proclaim the week of April S - 11 , 1981 as "BUILDING SAFETY WEEK" in Tigard . I encourage Oregonians to utilize this time to familiarize themselves with the important safety information and services available through these public servants . IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and causes the seal of the City of Tigard to be affixed. Mayor - City of Tigard, Oregon l Wilbur Bishop, Mayor March 17, 1981 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, Ore 97223 Dear Mayor Bishop; A very valuable Tigard resource--the south and west side of Little Bull Mountain with its stands of timber which help keep Tigard' s air clean and which are important to the environment and livability of the Tigard area will be lost if you approve the request to change the Comprehensive Plan from low density single family residences and allow 12 to 20 multiple housing development that has been requested. I understand there is pressure from the staff of LCDC and that this has pursuaded your planning staff and the Planning Commission that such action is required to meet quotos that LCDC staff has set. AYId h,12-1a T 1-7_ T.rn_C si--f-F i - t`- - - - Oregon agriculture land and this is valid, it should not be done at the expense of the environment of the cities. Such action is short- sighted and destructive to cities like Tigard, which must see that its natural resources are not destroyed and that things within the cities that need preserving are preserved. And, " I do not believe such destruction is the intent of LCDC Commission members. They have not acted on this directive from the LCDC staff, and when they do, I am sure they will take into consid- eration the preservation of designated natural features already existing in the Comprehensive Plan (such as Little Bull Mountain. ) Little Bull Mountain' s south and west side is presently desig- nated as "one of the natural features that give Tigard a distinctive character and quality. " The Plan goes on to specify that suburban low density zoning " "is necessary in these areas due to the following features : A. Slope artd soil conditions are not suited to higher density development with resultant road cuts and building excavations . B. Substantial amounts of timber would be lost if developed at a higher density. C. These woo e s opes prove a an outstanding natural feature of considerable scenic value to the residents ®l'TTigard. To denude and densely dev- elop the i would be a considerable loss to the—community. more 2- All of the property owners who are residents and live on the south and west slopes of Little Bull Mountain want the-71ow density designation retained. Only non-residents and developers are willing to sacrifice Tigard's trees, its environment and its liveability. Annex those who want to be annexed, if you wish, but leave the Comprehensive Plan as it is until the LCDC Commission has a chance to review their staffs ' position and its implications . Once you open the door to multiple housing on the south and west slopes of Little Bull Mountain, the destruction of all the trees will soon follow, and Tigard will have lost an invaluable resource that can never be replaced. ou ----- B. A. Barney McPhillips 15100 SW 109th Tigard, Ore. , 97223 JAI TiGRRD OFFICE, I �� PT'f�(S 1 �1r1."i1 -L`a -�i.�l�i Or, �J' G�Jl`T PHONE: 639-8656 - 11665 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 March 18, 1981 The Honorable Mayor and Council City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RF: S.W. 72nd Avenue L.I.D. Tax Lots 2S11DC 4100, 3801 , 3900 2SllDD 700 On behalf of the First State Bank of Oregon, owner of the above described property, I did, on December 5, 1979, submit a petition to the council for improvement of S.W. 72nd Avenue to a three lane collector. --- As the circulating petitioner, it was my understanding that the improvements were to include two 15-foot-wide traveling lanes with one leo-toot-wide left turn lane. These were the only improvements envisioned by myself and the only t ones described by me in circulating the petition to other property owners. At the time of our decision to circulate the petitinn we felt that it was necessary to improve 72nd to a simple and safe street capable of servicing the nees of the community. We did not envision the improvement as has been submitted and concur with many of the property owners that this project has become too immense in scope and should be scaled down to fit the needs of the community. We are therefore against completion of the proposal project but would be willing to participate in the planning for a new proposal . Respectfully, C.B. Anderson Assistant Vice President and Manager First State Bank of Oregon CBA/mj RECEIVE® -- MAR 18 1981 PP.TI`J 0N' CITY OF TIGARD January 22 , 1 9S 1 TO THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL: WE, THE UNDERSIGNED LANDOWNERS , OPPOSE THE 72ND STREET LOCAI" IMPFI'.CVEMENT DISTRICT . !po NAME PUSINESS ADDRESS q3 dol r - /f 110 r, lr G• kT� ��u� Lq,ke©sc�6o 4Je 97a.3g- 1/ �f {y ;i i�Pa �✓Lrb t�Jos�� cv/,��,, S�- a/,/ 9 7�0 Ll Ir i