City Council Packet - 12/15/1980 ti
c
. � l
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
DECEMBER 15 , 1980, 7 : 30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LECTURE ROOM
1 . ROLL CALL
2. WCCLS - Resolution Regarding Serial Levy - Donna Selle
3. ANNEXATION LETTER - Planning Director
4. APPOINTMENT OF PRO TEM MUNICIPAL JUDGE - City Administrator
5 . OTHER
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Under ORS 192. 660(2) (a) the Tigard City
Council will recess into executive session to consider information
regarding available property downtown.
7 . ADJOURNMENT
r..r
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
STUDY SESSION MINUTES - DECEMBER 15, 1980 - 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: President of Council John Cook; Councilmen Tom Brian,
Kenneth Scheckla, Councilwoman Nancie Stimler; Legal Counsel, Joe
Bailey; City Administrator, Raeldon R. Barker; Director of Public
Works, Frank Currie; City Librarian, Irene Ertell; City Recorder/
Finance Director, Doris Hartig; Planning Director, Aldie Howard.
2. WASHINGTON COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES (WCCLS) - RESOLUTION REGARDING
SERIAL LEVY
City Librarian, Irene Ertell, spoke to the proposed serial levy for a County
wide computer automated circulation system. Estimated cost is 1.5 million
dollars for a three year serial levy at $500,000 for each of the three years.
She went on to explain the need for the serial levy and requested the City sup-
port the proposal. Estimated cost is 8(� per $1,000 valuation for the first year
and it is anticipated this will be reduced in the continuing years due to increas-
ed assessed valuation.
Donne Selle, Cordinator of WCCLS, responded to questions regarding the levy and
pointed out the automated circulation system would eliminate labor intensive
costs related to the card catalog system; overdue notices; reduce costs for
libraries by eliminating excessive copies of specific books, assist with inter-
library loans. She explained the computer would be in the Aloha central office,
with terminals Located in the various libraries. Some of the functions, such as
the over-due notices would be prepared at that office.
Ertell and Selle requested Council support their request to place the measure
on the February 17, 1981 ballot. If the levy is passed the start-up time is
projected to be July-September, 1981. Concensus of Council was to consider a
resolution endorsing the request at their next meeting.
3. ANNEXATION LETTER
Mayor-elect Bishop was invited to participate in the discussion.
Director of Public Works discussed his thoughts and approach to the annexation
issue. He evaluated the various areas under consideration; should islands be
created and City's approach to the issue. He listed items City has to offer to
residents and preliminary planning work that has been done tc, pull the City to-
gether. To implement the planning he stressed the fact that the City must have
jurisdiction for improvements; i.e. street and storm water improvements, street
lighting, sanitation problems, meet L.C.D.C. housing goals.
Council concurred with Director of Public Works and discussed approach to
annexation, specifically the area of lower Bull Mt. , S.W. Gaarde and S.W. Walnut.
It was suggested an annexation committee be formed; letter sent out to the
residents and meeting be set-up for sometime in January. Council and staff
members to be present to answer questions. Council emphasized this area should
be used as a model for other major areas under consideration for annexation.
Staff was requested to redraft the letter for Council review at next meeting.
g
4. APPOINTMENT OF PRO TEM 14UNICIPAL JUDGE
City Administrator made Council aware of situation .where Pro Tem Judge Lou
Giovanini has accepted a State District Judgeship and Ken Bonn is ill and unable
to serve at this time.
Council, Municipal Judge Pelay and City Attorney Bailey were requested to submit
names to replace Lou Giovanini.
5. OTHER
A. City Administrator reported on the following items:
1. Washington County Elected Officials Caucus will meet at Wolf Creek Water
District, Thursday, January 8, 1981, 7:30 P.M.
2. Tigard Municipal Employees (TMEA/OSEA) mediation set for Tuesday,
December 23, 1980 at 9:00 A.M. , Tigard, City Hall. Bill Lang will be
mediator.
3. Community Development Block Grant proposal for downtown revitalization
study did not receive enough points to be recommended to the County
Commissioners. Rating Committee felt the request did not benefit low
and moderate income people. Discussion followed regarding rating of
projects and representatives serving from this end of the County. Concensus
of Council was a letter be sent to County Commissioners pointing out defic-
iencies at meeting and staff not being allowed to present additional inform-
ation.
Councilman Brian informed Council he has no further_ interest in serving on
the Board. He requested someone else be appointed or the position be left
vacant.
B. Finance Director requested Council approve progress payment #1 in amount of
$19,495.36 to Warren Brown on the Walnut Street Sewer LID project.
Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Brian to approve pavment.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
C. Director of Public Works reported receipt of petition to form sewer local
improvement district in the Knoll Drive area.
Director of Pulblic Work$ will meet with residents this week.
OWN
D. Councilwoman Stimler questioned staff regarding landscaping, grass seeding and
maintenance of grounds for the Senior Citizens Center. Staff to report back.
City Administrator commented he had met with City Attorney to work on lease
agreement and will bring to Council for consideration shortly.
E. Councilman Scheckla requested staff check into safety problem at S.W. 110th
street.
PAGE 2 - STUDY SESSICN MINUTES _ December 15, 1980
Meeting recessed 9:45 P.M.
Council went into executive session at 9:50 P.M. under the provisions of ORS 192.660
(2)(a) to discuss information regarding available property downtown.
City Administrator recommended before any consideration is given to this property
that extensive checks be made for deficiendes in the building and if the City is
still interested that the property be appraised.
Council concurred with City Administratorvs recommendation and gave instructions to
proceed.
Meeting adjourned 10:00 P.M.
,� /'fit{ J J�✓.C't��
City Recorder'
ATTEST:
PAGE 3 - STUDY SESSION MINUTES - December 35, 1980
Washington, County - Cooperative Library Semices
MAILING ADDRMSS: P.O. Box 5129/Alohn, OR 97006 LOCATION:Town Center/2700 NW 185th/Portland, OR 97229
_J))((L Phone 645-5112- 645-7402
�a�.�g'JJ '° Donna Selle. Coordinator/
lit
SAMPLE RESOLUTION '
WHEREAS the City of has successfully .completed over
four years of participation in the Washington County Cooperative Library
Services offering non fee library services to all county residents;:
WHEREAS the Washington County Cooperative Library Services intends to
offer a three year serial levy in the amount of $50O,000 annually for
approval of the voters of Washington County on Feb. 17, 1980;
WHEREAS the citizens of the City of will receive sub-
stantial improvements in library services through automation of library
circulation and catalog functions;
WHEREAS the acquisition, of the automated system will allow continu-
ation and improvement of library services in the future while containing I
costs;
WHEREAS the City of library is presently spending over
50% of their staff time maintaining car files rather than serving patrons;
WHEREAS Washington County Cooperative Library Services has agreed to f
purchase, impliment and operate an automated circulation system and other
computerized services tailed WCCLS - RAIN, on behalf of the libraries in
Washington:Cour.`y;
9e it resolved that the Council of the City of hereby declares
its intent to participate in the automated library system named WCCLS-RA111
and to support the request for the above -named serial levy on the Feb. 17,
1981 Ballot.
i
` SERIAL LEVY BUDGET
PROPOSED FOR FEBRUARY 17, 1981
WASHINGTON COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SERVICES
REGIONAL AUTOMATED INFORMATION NETWORK
W C C L S - R A I N
Levy Effective July 1 , 1981 - June 30, 1984
First Year Costs Second Year Costs Third Year Costs
Fiscal 1981/82 Fiscal 1982/83 1983/84
Purchase of System Hardware $482,000
and Software
Conversion Team 45,000
Site Preparation 60,000
Public Relations Program 3,000
Project Management 30,000 $30,000
Communicat:::._ Equipment 56,000
(Modems) 15,000
(lease) (purchase)
Communications Charges 20,000 16,000 20,000
Overdues (Mailers and Postage) 25,000 30,000 35,000
Patron (Registration and Cards) 6,000 2,000 2,000
Computer Operations - tapes, 15,000 15,000 15,000
diskpacks, paper, binders,
utilities and insurance
Maintenance Contracts - 40,000 52,000 60,000
Hardware and Software
WLN Authority Control 10,000
System Evaluation 11000 1 ,000 12,000
Finance Charges, Delinquent
100 000 100,000 172,000
taxes, Contingency
TOTALS $842,000 $312,000 $346,000
GRAND TOTAL $1 ,500,000
or 500,000 for each of three years
December 3, 1950
MEMORANDUM
To: Tigard City Council
From: Planning Director
Subject: Annexation letter for the property owners in the area
between Gaarde and Walnut at 135th.
At the last study session, I suggested that a letter be sent to
all the property owners effected by the Bechtold Annexation.
Enclosed is the draft of that letter. I wanted to get it to
you as soon as possible because we need ample lead time to get it
to the people.
Granted it is lengthy, but the most important stuff is up front
. . . purpose of the letter and the meeting date in January.
The glossary of terms will do several things. Those who do
attend the meeting will at least understand the terms we use
in our discussions. They will have an .opportunity to see a
map which clearly indicates the areas in question and they
will have had time to consider the issues mentioned in the
letter so that the questions may be pointed and meaningful.
Please have- your suggestions ready. We will discuss the letter
under "other business".
ROUGH DRAFT ANNEXATION LETTER
Dear Property Owner:
Annexation is an important word when you live within the Urban
Growth Boundary of Tigard. Recently, the City Council has been
asked to consider an annexation in your area. If this annexation
is approved it may mean that your property could be annexed to
the City. This letter will explain the process and what it may
mean to you.
After you have read this letter, and looked at the enclosed map,
you may have questions . It is the intention of the City Council
to hold a public information meeting at Fowler Junior High School
on January 1981 to discuss this issue with you. The meeting
will begin at :30 P.M. . We urge you to plan to attend.
Terms are very important. To aide you in understanding the content
of this letter we have included a glossary of the terms and phrases
that are used in the references to an annexation process .
ANNEXATION PETITION: A simple petiton form submitted to the City
o Tigar y property owners outside -t-he City boundary but whose
propertytouches the City boundary. �. approved, property is added
to the City.
CITY LIMITS : The actual line that surrounds the City of Tigard's
incorporated area.
URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY: The actual line established by the Metropolitan
Service District within which this City will develop between now and
the year 2000.
METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT — (METRO).: A locally created regional
agency responsible for the p anning in the Portland metropolitan area.
LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — (LCDC) : A state
created agency responsible - for the planning in the state.
PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION —
BOLJNDARY COMM SSI N An eleven person commission created y the
state to review annexations submitted to it by local jurisdictions.
ISLAND: An area created through annexation which is surrounded
by the City of Tigard, but is still in Washington County.
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — (USA) : The agency
responsible or the treatment o waste water within Washington County.
The City of Tigard is an agent of this organization, collects the
service charges , inspects the connections and issues the permits to
connect to the system. The City is responsible for the maintenance
of all sanitary lines, 24" in diameter or less throughout the City.
TRIPLE MAJORITY ANNEXATION: In accordance with the state law the
City must have to or more of three things before an annexation
petition can be presented to the City Council by resolution. 51% of
the property in acres, 51% of the assessed value of the property and,
51% of the signatures of the property owners .
t
PAGE 2
ROUGH DRAFT ANNEXATION LETTER
FORCED ANNEXATION: This term is used by the 49% of the persons
w ose laFia is to en in the City against their will when the triple
majority annexation method is used, or when the City Council, by
resolution, annexes an "island" In the cases where "islands '
exist or are created; the City Council can pass a resolution to
annex the island without using the triple majority annexation
method. At the present time there are more than ten "islands" within
the Urban Growth Boundary.
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - (LID) : This refers to an assessment
istrict formed by petition 37 property owners to construct public
service lines, sidewalks, streets, etc. The City accepts the petitions
engineers she property, forms the district, estimates the costs, holds
a public hearing to notify the persons in the district what the costs
will be, hires the work done and assesses the property owners in a
district to form an LID and it takes 66% to nullify that LID. Usually
LID's are farmed to take advantage of the City's ability to Bancroft
Bond the improvements for up to thirty years at a reasonable percentage
rate, and make public improvements which the persons in the district
require.
TAX BASE: A dollar amount fixed by the voters of Tigard recently
at ,098.00.
TAX RATE: We expect the rate rate per thousand to be $1.04 this next
year. If you property is assessed at $100,000.00, your- taxes paid
to the City of Tigard would be $104.00 per year. ;
Now that we understand the terms, let's talk about the issues.
Many of you have muttered bitterly about the condition of Walnut
Street. At the present time, .most of Walnut Street is in Washington
County. The majority of the residents in your precinct voted for
street' repairs, but the vote in Washington County did not pass the
increase in the gas tax. Your next alternative is Tigard. We have
a street overlay program and we do repair our streets. Last year we
overlayed 2 miles of streets at a cost of $113,000.00. We have a
systems development charge paid by new developers of residential and
commercial property which pays for improvements to collectors and
arterials . Walnut Street is a collector. The problem is that if we
do not have the jurisdiction of a street, we cannot improve it. The
only way that we can help you is if you will annex to the City so
that we can obtain the jurisdiction of the streets in your area and
repair them.
Septic tank systems fail. What then? Install a new system now and
chances are that within the next five years you will be involved in
a local improvement district for the installation of a public system
to serve development in your area. So what do you have? . . . . . . $4,500.00
in your bak yard and an assessment of $3,500.00 for the new service line
in from of your house.
Police proection. Our officers are in your area now, but have no
jurisdictional powers. It seems logical that we should be the ones
to answer your requests for assistance. Obviously our response time
is lens than that of Washington County.
PAGE 3
ROUGHT DRAFT ANNEXATION LETTER
Planning Services. You developed a Neighborhood Planning Area
Organization and had your plan approved in 1975. Your NPO #3
has not met for at least two years and many things have changed
dramatically in the last several months . These changes are
important to you, but without a neighborhood organization it
is very difficult for the City to communicate with you.
What is happening in Tigard is happening through out the
Metro area.
Tigard used to be a quiet little town "on the way to the coast".
Highway 99W carries 35,000 cars . a day now. Look around you. The
Koll Business Center on Scholls Ferry Road, Park 217 on Hall Blvd. ,
Summerlake, Morning Hill, Winter Take, the new- senior center on
O`Mara. . . . .We have processed approximately 150 site design review
applications in the past two years for commercial development. We
have approximately 800 platted lots in the City now and expect more.
i
Tigard s population will increase dramatically n the coming years .
LCDC and Metro have requested that we provide a 50/50 housing
mix. . . . .single family to multi--family outside our City limits
within our urban growth boundary. Rather than discussing all
the ramifications of this with you, perhaps we will be able to
get specific at the January meeting.
We need your help to unify Tigard for many reasons . Unless we
all work together to improve . our collective position we will all
suffer the consequences. Obviously annexations are frustrating
for all concerned, but the issue has to be faced and resolved.
We would appreciate your attendance at the meeting with the City
Council in January. Thank you for taking the time to read this lengthy
letter.
If you- are unable to attend the January meeting and have questions ,
please contact the Planning Director at 639-4171.
Yours truly,
Tigard City Council
tv
PoOo is OrrrEk-INS
TO
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
BY
COLDWELL BANKER COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES
PROPERTY OFFERED - (See Attachment)
Value determination -
$7/sq. ft. x 32,670 sq. ft. land $228,6,]
$20/sq. ft. x 7,312 sq. ft. building 146,310
$375,000 total price $51.28/sq. ft.
There is an additional 925 sq. ft. of second floor space not imputed
Into the sales price. There are an estimated 50 parking spaces
available in the event the lot is paved and appropriately layed
out.
FINANCING ASPECTS -
t
$375,000 Asking price
100,000 Down payment
$275,000 Contract carried by seller. Terms: 10-year payoff
maximum, interest rate 12%, 25-year amortization with
balloon payment at end of contract term.
$275,000 contract x .1264 constant - $34,760/year or, $2,896.67/
month or, $4.75/sq. ft./year NNN
COMPARABLE SPACE FOR SALE -
Scoffins Square. 8770 SW Scoffi=, Tigaz,, Oregon, $550,000 asking
price divided by 7,442 sq. ft. _ $73.90/sq. ft. (22,475 sq. ft.
land with only 23 parking spaces).
BENEFITS TO CONTRACT PURCHASER OF PROPOSED PROPERTY -
1. Immediate satisfaction of space needs for City Hall expansion.
2. Ease of expansion into proposed purchase building, proximity to
existing facilities.
3. Occupancy costs less than other alternatives for the immediate
future.
4. No need to seek financing alternatives in poor money market. Yet
-ability to pay off contract when permanent financing is available.
5. Adequate parking without purchase of additional land.
6. Allows City Hall service to r�_.,ain in the core of historic down-
town Tigard.
7. Rey parcel of land for future civic center development.
$ 375,000
Ground F1ooPrrCe 7,312
Upper Level: 925
Coldwell Banker 12400 & 12436 S.W. Main space/BIdg.Sizeg.f,
am COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE COMPANY Ti and Oregon Washing ton
A COCDWcLL BANKER COMPANY --g---...--t
Address/City County
R� pp�� s �a $ 1,613 Gross Yes
COMM ERCIAL®'M PRO E■ a Fent Per Month Net/Gross Mil Rent/Mol Ft.
i f.� No No 3 buildings totalling 8,237 sq. f
*EXCLUSIVE* Will Divide Remodel Space/Bldg.Dimensions
June 1980 0.29 acres and 0.46 acres
Submitted by: FOR SALE Date Available Lot size a Dimension:
In-line Retail
Office: Stto Location Previous Use /
Negotiable - not Commercial
Phone: over 29% 1st year Not marked 364/3-B Retail
Down Payment Parking Map Page Zoning
10/15/80 1187-R J. Robert Muse/Carl Anderson Portland
Date Elating Number Listing Salesman office
TERMS
Owner holds property free and clear. Will carry contract. Owner desires at least 20%
down payment, but may not exceed 29% in 1980, including amortization.
TAX DATA
1978/1979 Taxes: $1,977.04
Assessed Value: Land: $78,400; Improvements: $44,400
IMPROVEMENTS
Three buildings - all estimated over 20 years old. One building is wood frame. The
other two buildings are brick and frame combination. A11 have gas forced air heating.
One store has an air conditioning unit on the roof.
Building/space &W-erasions: 1) WWI x 69' (1,421 s. ft.); 26' x 69' (1,704 sq. ft.);
irregular (4,097 sq. ft.). 2) Second Floor: Partial is 925 square feet. 3) Lot
4500 is 0.29 acres (471' x 294.6' x 466' x 2861). 4) Lot 4300 is 0.46 acres (48' x
284.7' x 94.1' x 166.0' x 46.1' x 48.59).
STATISTICS & AREA DATA
Daily traffic count is 10,595 at Main Street. Located one block from 99W. Downtown
usage consists of City offices and other office users. Very active retail area. These
two land parcels and improvements surround Tigard City Hall on three sides.
COMMENTS
"resent rentals substantially below market rate. Two stores now on month-te-month
= .Leases. One lease ends 4/30/81. Excellent upside potential for rents. The 1,794
.square foot store at 12436 S.W'. Main is for rent on a month-to-month basis (until
bldg. is sold) for gross rent of $750/month. This stogie is air conditioned.
N
N
J_
d
U
The infortnal contained herein has either been given to us by the owner at the property or obtained from sources that we deem reliable.We have no reason to doubt its accuracy but we do not guaranteed Yauncy factors used herein are an
arbitrary percentage used only as an example. It tlxs not nxessarif relate to act wl ratancy,d anr.TMt value of this investment is dependent upon Giese estimates and assum trans made above as well as the investment income the'a
4c. IL
i
/ 4r s S H�
1328:
� 4
�/g �► s / 0
36
00 o=rloe
/
1901 ap
AC
` / b/
5400 A-( cab le
3400
\ 3300 , _ f �✓
\s •�-o 2900�i �t�`� 'P3200 '`O 2� °\ 9 - �'A`Lc9l - �4
r•�i s•. ��+ aO?.9c 3900
310 �- q1
w ^'30Q® ep �iev e®R /SAC.
2800 00
i t o 2880 .\2 y . . 'E'o<s64c. °R
is
4400
`'• \ . y' /,yr.•'�' 45Gp <Ao �.a 5300
.®
4,qr)/
156!.7 R r_ \
32+ 4
INS-CORtiER Qi Y►tE 4• J�J �,P9• J\ r '+i
sou
TW:/y os JOHN 00 0\ gew
ACICXLSh O—C 3r&,C6T
®QR"CotLT Com"ER QF �C d S' i i •,�, +%
9llitgMA81 TR.I`T. O• pt \ '� ��. icr ` �^�
o' 5100 i
/,r4C °< 5200
a oar .?3dec• _�
9�e�
SEE MAP ;-Or
of a.:aa
2S 12 AO ; ` IMMAL
V, o'�eao HERE
QI�Ie+,a �! pow E E 4 P
Exhibit IIAW
we
December 10, 1980
Tigard City Council
Tigard City Hall
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear City Council Members,
We have been instructed by vhe *NPO #4 membership to write a
letter to you denying the statement by city planner, Aldie Howard,
that we at anY time passed a resolution to abolish the A-4O zone
in our NPO.
After discussing the matter with Aldis at our lest meeting, we
realize that his statement to you was the .result of a misunderstanding
arising from an emotion charged meeting of the NPO hold on Nov. 12
in which he informed us that every one of our residential protection
Policies are now unworkable.
We are attaching a copy of the revised minutes from the Nov. 12
meeting so that you can read for yourselves something of what occurred.
We thank you for your continued interest in this matter.
Sincerely,
LaVa2aq Z n, Chairperson NPO #4
Jo Anne Nordling, Secretary NPO #4
ccs NPO #4 membership
MINUTES OF NPO A
Nov. 12, 1980
REVISED; December 3, 1981
Members atte'ndLng:
Chet Larter Non--ummbers attending:
Iry Larson
Sid Reese Lois Larter
Jo Anne Nordling Jerry Cash
Jerry Scott Aldie Howard
Ely Wilder Natalie Scott
Gordon S. Martin Del Ball
LaValle Allen Geraldine L. Bail
Lou Christen
Members not attanding: James R. Millar
Diane Allen
Mike Dessert
Jay Cundiff
Alan Roth
Jean Danley
The meeting was called to order by chairperson LaValle Allen.
The minutes of the last meeting were approved as written.
It was announced that Mike Dessert could not be able to serve
on the NPO if Wednesday was to be the regular meeting night. The
members present were polled and it was found that there is no
week night other than Wednesday possible for most members. The
secretary was asked to so inform Mike and to convey our regrets.
As requested by the NPO, Aldie Howard, planning director for
the city of Tigard, spoke on his interpretation of the A-40 zone
(LO dwelline unity to the acre) and how it affects present NPO uolicies.
Aldie is of the opinion that the existence of the A-40 zone
requires that sone off' the NPO policies need to be revised. Policies
which were set up specifically to protect the ]i%-^Ahil i4y „F ad jacent
residential areas, in his opinion, need to be revised to reflect the
existence of the A-40 zone. Policies
he sees as not workable are, for example, policy #27 (provides for
stepped down building heights next to residential areas), policy #33
(guarantees the present pattern of dead end residential streets),
Policy #34 (stipulates that developed streets shall not be used
as buffers of residential areas), and policy #3$ (provides that SW 70th
shall not Se developed until adjacent residential areas convert).
Tho response of the majority of NPO members present was disbelief
and dimtmym
F.
Aldie blamed the state Land Conservation and Development Commission
(the agency ,which originally provided for the creation and authority
of NPOa) for recent rule changes. Further, in his opinion, the NPO
had from the beginning, not been "realistic' in its attempt to protect
present residential areas from the inevitable encroachment of commercial
development. He suggested the NPO tw its new policies more in line
with reality.
Much discussion ensued. Four possibilities for further investigation
were proposed:
1. Move the A-40 zone one block east. Since the A-140
zone was imposed upon the NPO after the plan was offically
accepted by the city council and the planning commission,
and at a time when the NPO had disbanded, perhaps the NPO
can at least adjust its location away from the residential
neighborhoods.
2. Designate protected residential areas # 3 and k as future
A-!i0 zones to replace the present A-40 area. This would
mean all A-40 development in the NPO would have to wait
until these areas converted to non residential use.
3. Keep the A-40 zona where it now is but keep its
development subordinate to present NPO policies designed
to protect residential areas (even though this may necessarily
confine and lessen the intensity of development in some
of the A-40 zone).
4. Rewrite the NPO plan. Designate the A-40 zone as the
keystone of the new plan and try to ameliorate the impact
on present residential areas wherever possible. (This was
Aldie Howard's suggestion.)
Aldie Howard was asked to submit his opinions in writing res
(1). the development, of the A-40 zone and how that affects the present
NPO plan, especially policies # 5, 17, 27, 33, 34, and 35, and (2) his
recaeimandations in-writing for protecting residential areas.
The next meeting date was set for Wed., Dec. 3 at 7=30 P.M. at
the Lamb Weston offices (6600 SW Hampton) . At that time the NPO
will begin the process of deciding onn possible options r-.d methods
df -procedure for couaaunicating with the planning commission and city
c Dune it b
Submitted by
__-- Jo Anne Nordling, secretary
Enclosure: Reviaed mailing list
MINUTES OF NPO A
Dec. 3, 1980
t
Members attending
Sid Reese Non-members attend
Al.,-n Roth
Ely Wilder Aldie Howard
La.Valle Allen Jerry Cach
Jean Danley John Alexander
Chet Larter Lois Larter
Iry Larson Diane Allen
Jerry Scott Mr. and Mrs. C.R. Mullen
Jo Anne Nordling Taylor Danley
Leo Roberts
James Miller
Members not attending
nmdon- S. Martin
Jap Cundiff ...dropped from membership roll
Mike Dessert...dropped from membership roll
The meeting was called to order by LaValle Allen.
There was considerable discussion of the Nov. 12 minutes. Aldie
Howard requested that the fourth paragraph be amended to read as
follows%
Aldie is of the opinion that the existence of the
A-40 zone requires that some of the NPO policies need
to be revised. Policies which were set up specifically
to protect the liveability of adjacent residential
areas, in his opinion, need to be revised to reflect
the existence of the A-40 zone.
1W
Lit ......o...mvd
1 \illYliKV wA0 Made V aar.jla �•
Mr. Howard then suggested that rather than. put his opinion re:
the needed changes in writing, as the NPO requested, he would prefer
that the uembership go through the plan, policy by policy, to determine
the best protection possible under the circumstances. He stressed
there was nothing he could do to change LCDC rules requiring large
areas of „iigh density housing. He stated the entire city would soon
feel the_ impact. (Over 90 percent of A-40 zoning lies in NPO #h.)
LaValle reported that our request for review of development in
areas other than the A-40 zone,and specifically planned unit development
areas, hadibeen denied by city council based on Aldie Howard's recommendation.
Aldie explained that he had asked for the chance to convince the
NPO that building such a review process into the system was not necessary
and would entail too much time expenditure and cost for developers.
In his opinion, the crucial area for review by the NPO is the A-40 zone
only. After a lengthy discussion, Chet Larter moved that the NPO
not ask for planned unit development review. The motion was seconded
by Irving Larson. The motion passed ( 4 in favor, 3 opposed, 1 abstention)
LaValle asked Aldie to tell the group that NPO #4 had been drastically
reduced in size in its northern portion. Aidie did so and agreed to
revise the PPO snaps to reflect the change.
The agenda for the next meeting waa agreed upon, and shall be
to begin review of policies 5, 17, 27, 33, 34, and 35.
LaValle Allen then requested that the NPO secretary write a letter
to city council denying the statement made there by Aldis Howard that
this NPO had passed a resolution at our last meeting to abolish the A-40
zone. It was agreed to attach a copy of our Nov. 12 revised minutes so
the council could see for themselves that we had discussed four possible
options only.
A1dis then issued an invitation to all NPO members and residents to
attend an open house on Dec. 19. (See attached invitation.)
Irving Larson suggested that we invite Mr. Pollack, a large landholder
in the area, to attend the next meting to explain what he has in mind
for development on his land. It was agreed that this was a good idea
but that it should be postponed for a later time.
A"11 subsequent regular meetings were set
for the first Wednesday of each month. Next meeting will on Wednesday
y
T----u=- j 3981 Rt (i 'v s a P•m+ in the i,ema Weston offices (ooUU 5W Hampton).
Submitted by
Jo Anne Nordling, Secretary
Enclosures: Letter to city council
Invitation to Aldie Howard's open house