Loading...
City Council Packet - 12/04/1978 t S TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA DECEMBER 4, 1978, 7:30 P.M. FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LECTURE ROOM I. ROLL CALL 2. ANNEXATIO14 PLAN — material distributed 11/6 packet 3. PROPOSED MODEL HOME ORDINANCE — material distributed 11/20 packet 4. PARK BOARD — Re: Proposal For Preparation Of Park Site Master Plan For Summer Lake Park — material distributed 11/20 packet 5. . COOK PARK BANDSTAND (B.O.R.) — Status Report Request by Mayor 6. C.E.T.A. FUNDING REPORT — City Administrator 7. ANNEXATION REPORT — Lammerman & Berg — City Administrator 8. McDONALD AREA SEWER INSTALLATION (L.I.D.) — City Administrator 9. RESOLUTION COMMENDING WILLIAM BRAUN — Requested by the Mayor 10. RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO COMMENDING THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE JOY CHILDREN'S CHOIR — Requested by the Mayor 11. ROAD JURISDICTION TRANSFER ORDINANCE — City Administrator 12. TIGARD METHODIST CHURCH — Request for Vacation Easement — City Administrator 13. OTHER 14. ADJOURNMENT T I GAR D CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 4, 1978, 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur A. Bishop; Councilmen John E. Cook, Kenneth W. Scheckla, Councilwoman Nancie Stimler; Legal Counsel, Joe D. Bailey; City Administrator, R. R. Barker; City Recorder, Doris Hartig; Planning Assistant, Larry Svart, Planning Director, Kenneth Weaver. 2. McDONALD AREA SEWER INSTALLATION. City Administrator reviewed parcels that had annexed and recent developments in that property owners have expressed an interest to obtain sewer. Some of the interested property owners have obtained the services of an engineer to determine if it is feasible to install sewer line. If so, they plan to install and pay for the line. City Administrator pointed out that the Unified Sewerage Agency does not have any plans to provide area with sewer. There was considerable discussion regarding the formation of an LID. How to finance the project and the drawing up of an agreement. City Administrator reco- mmended the property owners be allowed to proceed with installation if they maintain the lift station and after acceptance, the City would maintain the sewer line. City Administrator further suggested Legal Counsel prepare an agreement and work with the property owners that would share the costs. He further stated he did not recommend the formation of an LID. Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilwoman Stimler, the City Attorney be authorized to meet with the interested parties and formulate an agreement. Staff to report back to Council. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 3. PROPOSED MODEL HOME ORDINANCE. Legal Counsel pointed out changes in proposed ordinance and suggested Legal Counsel review for additions or revisions. Bob Bailey, 7390 S.W. Alpine Drive, Sales Manager of Tualatin Development Co., and Broker for Summerfield stated he would like to meet with the Planning Department to express his concerns. Areas of particular concern are: Limitation to 3 Model Homes, 4 year limitation, homes be allowed to be furnished. Planning staff indicated they have a meeting scheduled for December 15th to review proposal with developers and realtors. Motion by Councilwoman Stimler; seconded by Councilman Cook to table item. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. Item will be brought to Council's attention after December 15th. 4. ANNEXATION PLAN. Mayor requested individual Council members express their concerns regarding the plan. There was considerable discussion by Council members present, reiterating their views, as stated previously, as well as in memos distributed in Council packets. Members of Planning Commission who testified were Marcus Wood and Cliff Speaker, who endorsed the recommendations of the Planning Commission. I Mr. Al Erickson, 15200 S.W. 209, spoke from the audience, was against forced annexation. Planning Director Weaver suggested the Council review the growth management plan in a work session before completing the annexation plan. City would then be dealing with growth issue before dealing with annexation issue. Bob Bellinger, member of Park Board, recommended City consider the "island annexation problems" for economy issues. Larry Svart reported the Boundary Review Commission, because of the number of annexation petitions received from this area, is considering reviewing the portion of the statute that would permit the BRC to authorize boundary changes on its own initiative. Concensus of Council was to wait for input from Councilman Mickelson before taking further action. Meeting Recessed 9:10 P.M. - Reconvened 9:15 P.M. PARK BOARD - Proposal for Preparation of Park Site Master Plan for Summer Lake Park. Fred Cooper, Park Board Chairman, reported the board has been trying to implement the Park and Open Space Plan through revision and adoption of new ordinances, identifying specific park sites, establish a greenway plan, develop Summer Lake Park, propose new community park near Fanno Creek and Bonita, etc. Mr. Cooper referred to proposal prepared by the ORB Organization that, for a cost of $7,900, would develop a master plan for Summer Lake Park. Mr. Cooper further recommended funding for the plan, be by use of Park System Development Charges. Councilman Cook questioned the deadline on use of funds for St. Mary's Woods Park. Staff reported project was cancelled. Cook also questioned the amount of money that would be allocated to the City through B.O.R. if the St. Mary's Wood Park project was cancelled. Staff thought amount was approximately $13,000. Discussion by Council and staff regarding proposed use of Summer Lake Park, the access, how park should be maintained, timing of development and acquisition of additional lands. Motion by Councilman Cook, the Attorney and City Administrator prepare documents needed to implement proposal for a master plan, and bring back to Council for approval. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Stimler. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 5. COOK PARK BANDSTAND (B.O.R.) Park Board President, Cooper, reported the status of the bandstand was in limbo at present time. The two grants for Cook Park were combined into one to develop the sports field. The designed conceptual plan has been submitted to the Park Board, however, City has not been billed for services, pending action by the Council. City Administrator stated the Marine Corps, has been contacted to give assistance with the sports field, but will not be available until after November, 1978. City does not want work done until after Unified Sewerage Agency has installed the sewer interceptor line. Council expressed concern that due to the wet rainy STUDY SESSION MINUTES - December 4, 1978 - Page 2 { season work would be delayed and project would not be completed by June 30, 1979. Council reaffirmed their intent to have the bandstand plan drawn and available for the time when project is funded. Concensus of Council was to have presentation by Architect William Gordon. Councilman Cook requested staff prepare and resubmit application for bandstand at earliest time next year so as to get project under way. Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilwoma•i Stimler, that architect bring plans to early January Study Session and have staff prepare adequate application for early submission in February. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Councilman Cook moved to authorize payment of necessary fees to Architect from Systems Development Charges in District #1 Park Funds; motion seconded by Councilwoman Stimler. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Park Board members requested staff's assistance in carrying out Park Board activities. 6. C.E.T.A. FUNDING REPORT City Administrator pointed out City previously had 18 CETA employees. However, due to attrition and hiring freeze, there are currently 12 employees. Due to lack of funding, City will be able to retain only all currently filled positions. New guidelines indicate there will be a severe cutback in the City's involvement in the program. 7. ANNEXATION REPORT City Administrator explained annexation proposals to be presented at next Regular Meeting. 8. RESOLUTION COMMENDING WILLIAM BRAUN Councilwoman Stimler moved; seconded by Councilman Cook to have resolution on next agenda, and requested Mr. Braun to attend meeting. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 9. RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO COMMENDING THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND THE CHILDREN'S CHOIR. Discussion by Council indicated it was worthy to recognize the Republic of China and Joy Children's Choir. Motion by Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to consider item at next regular meeting, and invite member of the Chinese Counsel to attend. STUDY SESSION MINUTES December 4, 1978 - Page 3 10. ROAD JURISDICTION TRANSFER ORDINANCE City Administrator gave synopsis of transfer of county streets to City as well as pointed out streets the county wished to maintain. Discussion followed regarding the city's street improvement program and specific areas needing improvement. Council discussed the status of improvement of S.W. Tiedeman at the curve. Legal Counsel will check into matter and report back. Ordinance accepting streets to be considered at next Council meeting. 11. TIGARD METHODIST CHURCH - Request for Vacation Easement. City Administrator stated staff has checked out request of the Methodist Church, however, there is an 8" storm sewer in the easement. City Administrator stated staff has no objection to vacation if the city does not have to relocate the storm drain. Staff to contact the church and report back to Council. 12. LOMITA STREETLIGHTS P.G.E. has reported the cost to install two lights on existing poles to cost approximately $55 for the remainder of the fiscal year. City Administrator recommended approval to install lights. Motion by Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to proceed with installation of lights. Motion approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. OFFICE COMPLEX LEASE FOR CITY. City Administrator has been contacted regarding City's interest in leasing space for City offices. Concensus of Council indicated they were not interested at this time. 14. OTHER Councilman Cook requested staff check on streetlights that burn all day and those that are not functioning. Area of special concern is S.W. Pacific Highway. Councilwoman Stimler requested City Administrator check into request to have police personnel secure signatures on petitions. Councilman Scheckla requested status of S.W. 110th and if barricades were temporary. City Administrator responded regarding street improvement. 15. ADJOURNMENT 11:00 P.M. ATTEST: .., -tom City Reco der Mayor STUDY SESSION MINUTES - December 4, 1978 - Page 4 a 4 I A ARCHITECTS P.C. A PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF TIGARD t ; FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PARK SITE MASTER PLAN - SUMMER LAKE PARK - Prepared For: The Tigard Park and Recreation Board 12420 S. W. Main Street " Tigard, Oregon 97223 y.{ : i Prepared By: The ORB Organization, Architects P.C. 1730 S. W. Skyline Boulevard Portland, Oregon 97221. _ ; ± Phone 297-3051 �i October 31 , 1970 `l OP 804 i a 1730 S.W. Skyline Blvd! -Portland, Oregon 972210 Telephone: (503) 297-3051 « • -.... 4 .. - A. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The City has recently approved a preliminary sub- division known as.Summer Lake. Located within this subdivision will be a 17 acre park contain- ing two small lakes. Since the developer will soon be grading and developing the entire sub- division, concern exists about the potential impacts this development may have upon the future park site. In addition, there is a need for a ball field complex in the near vicinity of this park, and if possible should be incorporated into ` the over all planning of the 17 acre park site. GOAL Prepare a Master Site Plan and grading plan for the 17 acre parcel before adjacent development begins and recommend a suitable site for the ball field complex. OBJECTIVES The specific objectives of this Master Site Plan A. study will be: o Recommend a parcel of land for a ball field complex large enough for a soccer field and two softball fields., o Incorporate the design of the ball field complex into the planning of the original 17 acre park site. o Develop a Master Site Plan centered around the two existing lakes, and reflecting the impacts from the proposed residential develop- ment. o Establish a guide for the orderly phased development of the site. o Establish a schedule of anticipated develop- ment costs and a practical guide to financing the improvements. o Prepare a mass grading plan for the 17 acre site. �i ;3 e i APPROACH We recommend a four phase approach to your project with meetings held between ORB and the Park Board during each phase. The four phases include: Phase I - Program Development Phase II - Site Inventory and Analysis Phase III - Site Master Plan Development Phase IV - Preparation of Grading Plan -i B. STATEMENT OF SERVICES PHASE I PROGRAM General Scope DEVELOPMENT During the Program Development Phase, ORB will meet with the staff and Park Commission to identify the proposed use and objectives for the park facili- ty. When the results of the Program Development Phase are combined and evaluated against the find- ings of the Site Inventory and Analysis Phase, a rational site plan can be developed. Specific Scope. The following specific tasks will be performed in the Program Development Phase. 1. Review existing park facilities located within the City of Tigard. 2. Meet with Tigard Park Board to review their `.r goals and objectives and identify the alter- native programs presently being considered for " the site. 3. Meet with the City staff to identify develop- ment constraints and requirements. 4. Meet with the Developer to review his develop- . ; ment program. { 5. Determine space needs for the ball field complex-; 6. Prepare a design program incorporating the findings of the evaluation. R. -2- F� } ',1 rte,..�.,..,• -:.:,. ..«_ ,._.. -..:...... .i.c......_r..-:.::�w......,c,......�:..:ti:._.�....:........,.....,.;.�...�..y._...._....:.�._... PHASE II SITE General Scope INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS During the Site Inventory and Analysis Phase of the work, ORB will make an inventory and analysis of all pertinent natural and man-made features of the site. This information will be collected from existing information and onsite investigations. It will then be recorded on base maps and overlays for later evaluation against the program require- ments identified during the Program Development Phase of the work. Specific Scope The following tasks will be accomplished by the ORB Planning Team during the Site Inventory and Analysis Phase. 1. Base Maps: ORB will prepare a base map utilizing The City's existing planimetric maps, tax maps and the subdivider's plat maps. 2. Natural Features: a. Topographic: ORB will utilize the City's planimetric maps. This information will be used for: o Identifying the lake boundaries and natural drainage patterns on the site. o Evaluating the effect of topography upon park development patterns. b. Soils: ORB will inventory all existing site soils information. We will prepare descriptive information to classify and i " evaluate the following general properties. o Drainage characteristics o Ability to support vegetation o Limitations to development = i c. Vegetation: ORB will inventory the exist- ing trees and shrubs on the site and classify them as to type, size and charac- ter. The ORB vegetation inventory will emphasize information which can be utilized by the City to: -3- , 1 o Conserve desirable• foliage or species. o Determine areas of the site which can better accept development. o Provide a list of trees and shrubs that will thrive on the site. 3. Cultural Factors: a. Man-Made Features: ORB will utilize exist- ing information and our field investigations to locate existing and proposed utilities, and facilities. b. Adjacent Land Use: Determine the character istics of the present and future use of the adjacent land and water, to include: o The effect, if any, that present and future land uses may have on the site. o The effect that the proposed Master Pian may have on the surrounding area. o Consider potential property acquisi- tions. c. Access and Traffic Movement: Analyze traffic movemen s to determine the best method of ingress and egress for park uses. d. Aesthetic Considerations: ORB shall inven- tory, compile and eva uate the following aesthetic characteristics. o Spatial patterns. o Views from and to the site. . i o Significant visual features of the site. o Smells and sounds, their locations and sources. o Man-made problems created by the ' existing parks. o General impressions regarding the perceptual qualities of the site. u � t h PHASE III - SITE MASTER General Scope PLAN DEVELOPMENT During this phase of the master planning process, ; ORB will evaluate the program alternatives identi- fied during the Program Development Phase against an analysis of natural and man-made features of the site completed during the Site Inventory and Analysis Phase of the work. This comparison of the Design Program against the site's limitations Ii will provide us with a functional planning program for use in studying the various master plan alter- natives available to the City. We will then study several different planning alternatives which will allow us to select the best planning solution for development into the final Master Site Plan from which cost estimates and a phased implementation plan can be developed. Specific Scope The following specific tasks will be performed in the Master Plan Development Phase of the work. 1. Master Site Plan (Graphics): After approval of the Design Rrogram by the City, the ORB F Planning Team will develop and analyze several design alternates. These alternatives will delineate various lake configurations and water features, natural areas, play areas and other recreational facilities to include circulation patterrrs',''building or structure locations, special equipment, parking areas, grading and drainage considerations and other components to be included in the overall Master Plan Development. 3 ORB will evaluate the proposed conceptual designs and will present them to the City along i with schematic drawings to illustrate the general scale and character of the project. CIi ORB and the Park Board will jointly select the best conceptual design alternative and ORB will prepare a final Master Plan drawing delineating ' the specific location and size of recreation areas, landscaping and other support facilities. One copy of this plan will be colored and h mounted for public display. >: j -5- y , i 2. Cost Estimates: ORB will prepare a detailed cost estimate for the project. This cost estimate will be broken down into specific items of work so that the City can analyze and develop the project in a number of separate phased increments. ' 3. Phasing Program: Based on the development costs identified in Step 2, the amount of funding capability of the City and a logical sequence of development, ORB will prepare a phasing program for use by the Park Board. The phasing plan may cover 2, 3 or maybe 5 years depending upon the amount of resources the City has. 3 4. 'Search for Grants: ORB will identify and recommen severs federal and/or state funding sources that are applicable to this project. PHASE IV GRADING PLAN General Scope After the Master Site Plan has been completed, ORB will prepare a mass grading plan for the 17 acre site. This plan will be at enough detail so that it can be followed by the developer during his grading program. It is anticipated that a final grading will occur during the actual development of the park site but will involve moving only a t small amount of material. � ° t ' C. STATEMENT OF SCHEDULE While the City has not specified a completion date, ORB has prepared the following schedule of events starting from the go-ahead by the City. - '3 .i ' t C. STATEMENT OF SCHEDULE (cont'd.) PHASE I - Time PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Organization and Detailed Scheduling Completion of Preliminary Client Coordination Meetings . . . . . . . . 1 week Completion of Planning Program . 2 weeks PHASE II Obtain Existing Site Information, SITE INVENTORY AND Base Maps and Other Data ANALYSIS * ' Complete Graphic Presentation . . . . PHASE III - Complete Conceptual Studies . 2 weeks MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT Client Review Meeting to Present Conceptual Studies . . . . . . . . 1 week Complete Final Master Site Plan and Cost Estimates 2 weeks Client Review Meeting to Present Final Master Plan, cost estimates, Phasing Program and funding sources 2 weeks PHASE IV - Complete mass grading plan for 17 GRADING PLAN acre project 2 weeks R Total Project Time 12 weeks a *This work being accomplished during the same time period as the program effort. j .3 A .i , s D. STATEMENT OF FEES The summary of study costs presented below has ' been broken down into the various parts and phases to assist the City in evaluating the impact of each major item of work. This Schedule of Values will also provide a convenient guide for progress payments. The professional fees outlined below include all labor, materials, and reproductions for inter-office use by ORB, equipment and travel , as outlined in this Proposal. i 7 . 1 ♦ - k 1 PHASE I Program Development . . . . . . . . $ 1 ,000 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TOTAL PHASE I $ 1,000 PHASE II - Preparation of existing base map. . . . $ 400 SITE INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS Field inventory and on-site .j investigation . . . . . . . . . . 650 Preparation of inventory and analysis study, office work, graphics . . . . . . . . . . 1,150 TOTAL PHASE II $ 2,200 PHASE III - Preparation of conceptual studies . . . $ 1 ,100 MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT Preparation of Final Master Plan 2,000 Development of cost estimates . . . 200 Preparation of Phasing Program 200 Search for grants 200 i TOTAL PHASE III - $ 3,700 t i ' PHASE IV - Preparation of mass grading plan GRADING PIAN for 17 acre parcel _ . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,000 i ! TOTAL PHASE IV . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,000 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEE . . . . . . . . $. 7;900 r� ii MULTNOMAH•WASHINGTON CETA ���CCCJJJ Ak CONSORTIUM ..� Public Service Employment Program al � 172 S. 1st Street Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 4 640-1781 R November 28, 1978 Dear Agency: As you can see .from. the attached letter for distribution to all participants, we have received planning figures from the Department of I.;--bor, and will not at this time have to lay off.- any participants working in slots . The high attrition rate during the past few months, coupled with the, hiring freeze in-' stituted in August; has brought our. enrollment down to a level we can sustain for .the remainder of the fiscal year. Next year, however, we expect to receive significantly- less "discretionary" money, and will have to lower our enrollrient even further. Thus, a certain percentage of our positions will be identified for termination on September 30, 1979. If these positions become vacant before that date, they will not be refilled. Positions so designated will be ones uffiich re- ceived low scores in our annual slot review and prioritization this fall. We will inform you 'inthe near future as to which ofy our positions, .if any, are so affected. Slots that are now vacant which received high scores in• the revicw -Jill be refilled as funds are freed up through attrition in loner ranking positions. This will be a slow process, and I am sorry to prolong the inconvenience of unfilled positions. We also hope to begin refilling some vacant positions in Special Projects which have end dues after February, 1979, This .too will depend upon .the availability of funds, and we will soon be contacting project. sponsors with .information about refills. We will begin running those new projects originally scheduled for October in late January or February. The Coord- inator for your county will contact you within the next month concerning I.etter of Ap eement negotiations and start dates . The CETA legislation which was signed by President Carter on October 27 contains - several significant changes. I will brief- 1Y C"Utli.i?�-- S01-c of Lhcsci here, and iwi.l1 CUi?tlz!'1 Lo 1.11ft)rr,1 JiI -of other implications as they are made know`_ to us. �. The new law places.much morn emphasis upon training, particu- larly in Title II. Worksites will be expected to hire people with lower skill levels and to provide theca with training. This will require a greater commitment of agency time and resources, but will result in better work experiences for part-. icipants. I hope that you will hell us provide participants with quality training and increased skills. An Equal Opportunity Employer Administrative offices 806 S.W.Broadway,Portland,Oregon 97205 Phone:248.5192 The maximum CETA-paid wage is still $10,000 per year, but will be "regionally indexed" upward in some parts of the country. We expect to have our ceiling somewhere between ten and twelve thousand dollars per year. When we are provided with the new figure, we will inform all agencies. So much for the good news. Though the wage ceiling may rise, there will be limits on wage supplementation. No salary in Title II may be supplemented by non-CETA funds, and salaries in Title VI are limited to a 10% supplementation figure. (These stipulations apply only to persons hired after October 1, 1978. Those on the program before that date may continue to have their wages supplemented.) This means that no Title II job can be refilled if it pays over the regionally indexed CETA maximum (still to be determined) , and no Title VI job may be refilled if its pay rate is 1103% of this maximum. We have been assured by the- Department of Labor that we will have the ceiling - figures by January 26, 1979. Between now and then, we cannot refill any Title II jobs paying over $10,000 per year or Title VI jobs paying over 11,000. As if this were not enough, Congress has established a nation- wide average wage target of $7,200 per year, regionally indexed of course. This works out to the munificent sum of $3.45/hr. , on the average. Needless to say, this will be quite difficult to attain, and will require that agencies design new positions at extremely low rates of pay that incorporate large amounts of job training. Aside from the technical problems, I find it ridiculous and obscene that a program designed to alleviate people's economic misery should be forced to pay wages at or near the poverty level. In general, the new law is highly restrictive, and all of us involved in providing public service eraployment to the disad- vantaged will have to make a multitude of adjustments in the months ahead. I thank you for your patience in the past, and your cooperation in the future. Sincerely, Cam Groner Program Director Public Service Employment /kw MULTNOMAH-WASHINGTON CETA CONSORTIUM Public Service Employment Program �i E 172 S. 1 st Street Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 } 19 7 8 640-1781 R E a Dear Participant: . We have finally received our budget planning figures from the U.S. Department of Labor., and I 'm very happy to announce that we have enough money to keep on all participants currently working in slot positions . . In addition, we will not have to terminate any Special Projects for financial reasons before their scheduled end. dates . Our allocation for- this. year included a large -amount of "dis cretionary" money, which we unfortunately will not have.next year. . This means that we will have to phase down our enroll- ments even further by September 30, 1979. Accordingly, several positions will be closed out as of that date. Notifications of which positions will be thus affected will be sent in a few weeks . Also, Congress has set a new time limit on participation in Public Service Employment. All participants hired after April 1, 1978, will have a maximum of 18 months on the program. All those hired between October 1, 1977 and April 1 , 1978 will have September 30, 1979 as their termination date. : Anyone hir- ed before October 1, 1977, will be terminated from the program 24 months (2 years) after their hire: date. To avoid confusion, we will provide you in the coming months with your theoretical termination date. Please remember that these dates are limits uponap rticipation, not guarantees of employment. Though our overall budget has been cut, a large portion of it is mandated to be spent on trainin-. At this time, we will accept requests for reimbursement for costs incurred in attending academic classes and workshops. There -will be no dollar limit on the amount of each request, and each person may take as many classes as he/she desires. As in the- past, we must receive a completed Training Request Form before the start of each class. - Please contact your Counselor ,for details . Because of attrition and a larger amount of discretionary money than expected, we are very fortunate in not having the massive layoffs we anticipated. I thank you for your patience and your endurance during the past few months, and I hope the re- mainder of your participation in PSE is enjoyable. Sincerely, C�..L:�L- "r�•'�:291 .. Cam Groner Program Director Public Service Employment An Equal Opportunity Employer Administrative Offices 808 S.W.Broadway,Portland,Oregon 97205 Phone:248.5192 ANNEXATION REPORT TO: MEMBERS OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL FROM: ALDIE SUBJ.: ANNEXATIONS AT THE NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION YOU WILL BE PRESENTED WITH TWO ANNEXATION RESOLUTIONS - LAMMERMAN AND BERG. LAMMERMAN - I INTEND TO CONTACT OWNERS OF TAX LOTS 4500, 4200 and 4100. AT THE PRESENT TIME I HAVE INCLUDED TAX LOT 4500 TO ADD CONTINUITY TO THE ANNEXATION. HOPEFULLY OTHERS WILL JOIN. THE REQUEST IS FOR SEWER SERVICE AT TERRACE TRAILS TO ALLOW DEVELOPNENNT OF THE BACKS OF THESE LARGE LOTS. I SUGGESTED THAT DEVELOPMENT BE 1 CARRIED OUT AS ONE PROJECT RATHER THAN TWO AND THAT ACCESS BE PROVIDED THROUGH TO 121ST BECAUSE TERRACE TRAILS IS AN ILLEGAL CUL-DE-SAC. OUR ORDINANCES ONLY ALLOW 400FEET UNLESS A VARIANCE IS GRANTED AND IN THIS CASE I CAN FIND NO RECORD OF THAT ACTION. ACTUALLY ALL THIS i IS A PLANNING DEPARTMENT MATTER ONCE THE PROPERTY IS ANNEXED. BERG - THIS IS A SINGLE LOT ANNEXATION OFF BONITA ROAD. SEWER IS AVAILABLE IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH OF THIS PROPERTY. I HAVE NOT MADE AN ATTEMPT TO CONTACT OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. MY FEELING IS THAT AS SOON AS THIS AREA BECOMES AN "ISLAND" THAT LARGER PARCELS WILL COME IN. AT THIS TIME I THINK IT BEST TO REDUCE OUR PROFILE AND WAIT. i c i { I e I Fp d N2 3989 SAMPLE BALLOT SPECIAL ELECTION -- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON JULY 12, 1977 OPERATIONAL LEVY PROPOSAL SHALL THECITY OF TIGARD BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE CITY FOR THE PERIOD $). BEGINNING JULY 1, 1977, AND ENDING JUNE 10, 1978, THE SUM OF $117,594 IN EXCESS OF THE TAX BASE OF THE CITY COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION it, ARTICLE XI, OREGON CONSTITUTION? EXPLANATION OF BALLUT QUESTION The purpose of this measure is to provide a portion of the funds necessary to continue the provision of existing t Operational Budget services which include police, parks, sreets, insect control and planning. If this measure Is approved that portion of the operating budget to be wholly financed by local taxes for the tax year 1977-1978 will be $16,146 less than that portion of the operating budget wholly financed by local taxes for the preceding year. If approved the estimated tax rate for this proposal is .46 cents per 1,000 assessed valuation. The estimated tax rate for ell City services will be reduced from $1.42 per 1,000 assessed valuation to $L its per 1.000 assessed valuation. The total estimated lax on a $70,000 home for 1977-78 would be $35.40. Mark a cross (x) or check (✓) inside the voting square to indicate our choice. YES F-1 I vote In favor of the proposed levy. NO O I vote against the proposed levy. THREE YEAR SERIAL LEVY FOR YOUTH SERVICES PROPOSAL SHALL THE CITY OF TIGARD BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY, IN BEHALF OF TIGARD COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED, $2. THE SUM OF $66,000 TO BE LEVLEU SERIALLY FOR THREE YEARS BEGINNING JULY 1, 1977 AND ENDING JUNE 10. 1980 IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,000 PER YEAR, SAID SUM BEING WHOLLY IN EXCESS OF THE TAX BASE OF THE CITY AS COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION it. ARTICLE XI, OREGON CONSTITUTION? EXPLANATION OF BALLOT QUESTION The purpose of this proposal is to provide $22,000 per year for cacti of S years to TIKard Community Youth Services Incorporated to defray a portion of the operational expenses of that organization. Tigard Community Youth ..e rvlees provides a prevention program designed to keep youth out of the juvenile court system through Interventlon services which include counselling, Job referral, parent education, big brother and big slater programs, infonaatfonal seminars and crisis Intervention. If this measure is approved, that portion of the operating budget to be financed wholly by local taxes for the tax years 1977-78, 78-79, and 79-80 will be $L7,000 greater than that portion of the operating budget financed by local taxes for the 1976-77 tax year.- If approved, the estimated tax rate for 1977-78 will be 9 cents per 1,000 assessed valuation and would reduce by an uncertain amount each year thereafter due to Increased assessed valuations. The total estlma ted cost to a $10,000 home for 77-78 would be $2.70. Mark a cross (x) or check (,/) Inside the voting square to indicate our choice. YES 0 I vote In favor of the proposed levy. NO I vote against the proposed levy. AGED SERVICES LEVY PROPOSAL SHALL THE CITY OF TIGARD BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY IN BEHALF OF TIGARD LOAVES AND FISHES INC., FOR AGED $3. SERVICES PURPOSES FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING JULY 1, 1977 AND ENDING JUNE 10. 1978 THE SUM OF $5.000 IN EXCESS OF THE TAX BASE OF THE CITY COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION ll, ARTICLE XI, OREGON CONSTITUTION? EXPLANATION OF BALLOT QUESTION The purpose of the proposal is to provide $5,000 to Tigard Loaves and Fishes to defray a portion of the operational costs of this organization which provides nutritional, transportation and other services to the aged. If this measure is approved that portion of the operating budget financed wholly by Tigard taxes for the tax year 1977-78 will be $1,000 greater than that portion of the operating budget financed wholly by Tigard taxes for the preceding year. If approved, the estimated tax rate will be 2 cents per 1,000 assessed valuation. The total estimated cost to a $10,000 home for 1977-78 would be 60 cents. Mark a cross (s) or check (V) inside the voting square to Indicate our choice, - T- I vote in favor of the proposed levy.:# `. Np I vote against the proposed levy. - � .M"•i•-'- .-iii 9 N (!1 N n O N �4:w N+ N O ion J s;Ni S4 woo c N o 'o iiilliiSTFry` o .a m I 1 1Q AU w�' I Jio? /.• •. A4 4 ip \ Ilii 1 t p`jy /•J i�r' O e o o mo �O z A N N 1' b ti av IrZn a � ti A � A c V 4 4 N cel} T N 4 O p � 4 4 7 G G n � A I 1 = CA VV A V1 rn a � `�Q z i• 1 �'J•f W Y C min � [� o:� �• � 1 � 'O N yZf 7' p J QJ 17326 N 01^1B•[ 211.35 a, R< S.W. G ._ 22' 2'-1 ..�».�2 ............,....,..... 3 A24"r_ 1 N00-ale 24" •qn �'i S' . M35 37 =2tas N 7. °?of L a O o y--j l A 3 `w` O n �--•� � W p � •ly °J'•It A' m 1 _ LB r 56 • LL I �1 u � n"� 0 1 N ! H N O • N I 2 N ,�•i' ` O Ac I _ w ISO13-0 700 ~ ' O NOS O*w S ; • ¢ W Pi.' 1879 N89°20'W /'63 dc. , L� O N a 187.9 sazo4 >, -Oz sas'44' _ 800 f 142' /OOAt. 1600 ; N 400 111 , I1.97Ac ` O 0.69Ac. 5 N I N 601 o 589 N65°20•W 0 1 �,;;� 169.GB' ISO' N89°2O'w 335.3' 331.6' 111.0 /:B9°20'W 1;VV 2 2600 27003J.2� 2600 330.97' (`\40 330.97 b47A 0.16 .82Re ' .50de. O.S/Ac4000 4100. /.TO de. \.. /6B k. -z.1 OI f5 N ooAt. 0 68 67 Lj nrJruG 701 N W N Q N r 293 j 3•_4.93'06dc. 130IS' 330.15• x.300 00 39 + 42G0 �.91 Ae. 2900 900 n l.48Ae 18BAc. 0.94 At. ° W 59 Lij 10 60 61 J _ a > a 300 ° C 0.94 Ac .2 338.91' 329.28' •• 329 28' 2200 33e.91 3000 3800 + 4400 I.94Ac. 619.29_-- 7 1.94 Ac. /.BB At /R9 X, .T 1 /440AC. �� 58 57 7 1 0 342.87' + 342.67' s28.41' 328.41' 2100 3100 3700 4500 ' 0.94 At. I.97Ac. 94Rt. (ti 1.07 d c. 812.37'_-_ 2000 W7'z 50 1. >fn 34ti 83' 32754' _ 3604 4 3200 3603 " 600•- o Y0.94�' .54Ae 2.39Aa 2.76Ac. 8 n �1 46 a 45 43 3300 - (CS.nhlles3) Y 36C0 ! Y I.05,4t. 3601 -55 AC• i J9te ^ /Jl/l/////T!."." w%?�„', T31tiT�' e g I L- � 330.7l�- t47 17967 32C' 1 � -_-ti- - 1 v - 93A 0. - 1 1 0.9JAc 1 tl NO. 11.036) 8W CORN R Jai rs 5:7• N.N ICKL IN OLC 43 . L j38 3400 1 ef 0.93 Aa.- H _ _ N �Z SEE- MAP r. 40 2S 1 12C- ' v .. RECEIVED D E C 11978 Portland Geral Electric is ConWnY CITY OF TIGARD G450 L=m November 27, 1978 Mr. John Hagman City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear John: At your request, I am enclosing a copy of the street lighting proposal as should apply along S.W. Lomita Avenue. The proposal calls for two (2) additional street lights which could be installed on existing t PGE line poles Cll-35d/6813 and 6814. When installed, the cost to the city under our schedule 91, option "A", Tariff E-9 , would be as follows: 2-7000 LMV Luminaires @$4 .63 = $9 .26mo/$111.12yr 2-Existing PGE line Poles @$0 .00 = $0 .00mo/$000 .00yr 6mo 111. 2yr If you should have questions regarding my proposal, please contact me by calling 643-5454 ext. 360 . Very truly yours , Kenneth L. Snyder Street Lighting Consultant enclosure KLS:rem a — VWstem Divis:on-14655 S-W.0!d Scho!s Ferry Road—B-zi'e6itin U&,cp.97005-643-5454 s ekAf . e - �o .�w•�'►.rA nr rl •v 4 w :i 1 CITY Of . BEA VERTON info . 4950 S.W. Hall Blvd. Beaverton. Oregon 97005 (503) 644-2191 November 22, 1978 To: Washington County Elected Officials Mayor Jack Nelson and the Beaverton City Council will be hosting the Washington County Elected Officials Caucus, to be held in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 4950 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Beaverton, Oregon, on Thursday, December 7, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. You and members of the City Council and staff are invited to suggest items to be placed on the agenda for this meeting. As discussed at the Forest Grove meeting, we are planning to have meet with us the MSD Executive Director and the Counselors from districts within Washington County. Items to be placed on the agenda should be submitted to the City Recorder no later than Friday, December 1st. Sincerely, S.-SO-1-C 0. Susanne Heimbigner City Recorder ' V RD UFD A WEEKLY NEWSLETTER VOLUME 1 ISSUE 41 N0VEMBER 30, 1978 DURHAM GRAVEL PITS OR LANDFILL? MSD is apparently considering using the Durham Gravel Pits as , a sanitary landfill. The City Administrator has received a • letter from Mayor Percy of Durham which outlines their concern and the actions they propose in opposition. The area is presently zoned M:3 which does not allow sanitary landfill operations. Should MSD decide to use this land for a landfill, they will obviously have to apply to the City of Tigard Planning Commission for 3 a •Zone Change. I I NEW BOOKS FOR BOOKKEEPERS. ! The City Recorder/Finance Officer has ordered administration and accounting books for Staff from the Municipal Finance Officers Association. Delivery is expected before the end of this year. RADAR GETS RESULTS. ' The new Police Radar Gun has doubled the number of traffic cases .in Municipal Court. Staff work has also doubled. HOUSING PLAN. All seven NPO's will be asked to review and comment on the Housing Implimentation Plan which was prepared by the Planning Department. It is felt that Citizen Participation whould be added to this important segment of our overall plan. PLANNING COMMISSION. Mrs. Kolleas has been appointed to serve as a member of the Planning Commission immediatley. Mr. Roy Bonn will assume his new role in January to replace Tom Brian. SUVZWFIELD LECTURE. The City Administrator, Chief of Police and Mayor-Elect Mickelson visited with approximately 100 Summerfield homeowners on Nov. 16, 1978. The topic of discussion was Crime Prevention and Homeowners Protection. NP0 7. ;�} A meeting will be held on December 13,1978 for members of NPO 7. The Planning Commission requested this meeting to iron out a few details in the plan prior to apporval by the Planning Commission and referral to the Council for final adoption.