City Council Packet - 08/23/1976 O
O
OD
\
' N
TT.CARD CITY COUNCIL rn
( REGULAR MEETING
A-'Gi'ST 23, 1976, 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LECTURE ROOM
AGENDA:
L� CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CONVENE BUDGET COXMITTEE MEETING
(a) Roll Call
(b) Discussion
(c) Recoranrndation
CALL. TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON *ION-AGENDA ITEMS
APPOINTMENT OF PRO-TEM CITY RECORDER
CONSENT AGENDA1 (All matters under this heading ar., ^^nsi3_rEd to b� routine
by the City Council and will be ..*•3c t,�J in one mctirn in the form
listed below. There will be r�, separ;tc: discussion of these
items. If discussion is deaired by any Cuu-!;:il t-&mber or
member of the audience, that. item will be frLc, 011,
Consent Agenda and will be considered si_par::tely�)
Approval of Minutes - August 9, 16, -Q76
(b,) Approval of Expenditures and Inve,strenLs:
( ) MONTHLY REPORTS - Receive and File
Ad;�:inistration Finance Pla-.--ir_5
Building Library Police
fid) Receive an.d file WRITTEN COM►•IUNICATIONS
Fr:,% John R. Skourtes, National Safety Cc, re: waiver of variance fee.
Blaine Whipple re: Revenue Sharing fc,r OrF-eon Cities
Governor Straub re: Revenue Sharing for Oregon Cities
Jason Boe re: Land Use Survey
Memo from Planning Staff re: frontage Toad
U.S.A. re: Sewer Service Rate Increase
State Highway Division re: Allen Blvd - 217 Interchange
League of Oregon Cities re: National. League of Cities Annual Congress
Pat W-hiting - re: Revenue Sharing for Oregon Cities
(e) Setting of Public Hearings Commencing at ;�200 P.M. September 13, 1976 at Fowler
Junior High School Lecture Room, 108b.5 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon,
l 1. ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-75 (Bunn)
A request by Ken Burn for general plan and program review of a
proposed residential planned developmer_t located at S.W. 109th Avenue
and S.W. Canterbury Lane (Wash. Co . Tax Map 2S1 LOAD, Tax Lot 8.300).
8. APPROVE REFUND DMV/R.C. MALIN - Design Review Board Fees $60.00
(a) Reconr,endation of Planning Director.
9. RESOLUTION No. 76- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, IN BEHALF OF THE
CITIZENRY OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY, DFCLARING THE CITS''S
SUPPORT OF AND REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION
OF THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
(No. 23-J) AND THE BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT (No. 4S).
(:a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
10. APPROVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator and Legal Counsel..
APPROVE CONTRACT - State of Oregon - res Mobile Ferre Inspection Program
(a) Recommendation of Legal Counsel.
12. ACCEPTANCE OF SAFEGUARD-PARTEX EASEMENT - Hun.ziker Street L.I.D.
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
13, ORDLNANCE No. 76-
AN ORDLNANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28, OF
THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 1.0.28.130 TO
PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF S.W. COMMERCIAL STREET
LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Recowendation of City Administrator.
14. ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE Nc„ 74-529 TO INCLUDE
A SIGNING PROGRAM FOR THE FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ZONE CHANGE - Request by Farmer's Insurance Group for an amendment to a
Planned Development (signing program) located between S.W. 66th Avenue
on the east and Highway 217 on the west. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 LD, Tax
Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 701, 1100).
(a) Recommendation of Planning Director.
'S. ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL CITY ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, ON NOVEMBER 2, 1976,
IN CONNECTION WITH THE REGULAR GENERAL STATE ELECTION, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE LEGAL VOTERS OF THE CITY
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 23, 1976
15. (Cont.) OF TIGARD, OREGON, THE QUESTION OF ESTABLISHING A NEW
TAX BASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 11, ARTICLE XI, CONSTITUTION f
OF THE STATE OF OREGON AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
l
r
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
lo. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Commencing at 8:00 P.M.
i
(a) ZONE. CHANGE REQUEST: Request by Fletcher, Hansen and Parsons for a general �
plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office park Planned
Development located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Avenue and S.W.
Varns Road (Wash.Co. Tax Map 2S1 1D, Tax Lot 900). �
t
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Statement of Facts by Planning Director
(3) Public Testimony
Proponents j
Opponents
Cross Examination j
(4) Public Hearing Closed
(5) Consideration by Council
(b) RENAME EXISTING DEDICATED ROADWAYS - Request by City of Tigard j
S.W. 77th Avenue (old name) to S.W. Cherry Drive portion lying
south of SW Varns Street running south to S.W. Fir Street.
S.W. Cherry Street (old name) to S.W. Cherry Drive portion lying
south of SW Fir Street running south and cast to SW 72nd Avenue.
S.W. Watkins Avenue (old name) to SW Brookside Avenue portion lying
northeast of SW Walnut Street and running northeast 471 feet.
S.W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. Greens Way portion lying south
of SW Summerfield Drive and running south and west 694 feet.
S.W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. Greens Way portion lyin -40uth of
SW Summerfield Drive and running south and east 299 feet. i
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Public Testimony
(3) Public Hearing Closed
(4) Consideration by Council
ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME u) CERTAIN ROADWAYS,
HEREIN SPECIFIED, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(c) DESIGN REVIEW - Review by the City Council of a Design Review Board ;
decision on July 27, 1976, approving a request by Atlas Land Company
to construct a 16,000 square foot industrial building at 9380 S.W.
Tigard Street.
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Public Testimony
(3) Public Hearing Closed
-•(4) Consideration by Council
C PAGE 3 - COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 23, 1976
17. OTHER
(a) Street Sweeper Use Policy
(b) Status Report
• i
Tigard Lumber Company Building r
Utility Equipment - Display of Equipment
Pest Control
(c) Skourtes Refund Request
(d) Planning Commission Study Session on Statewide Planning - August 31.
i
i
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 23, 1976
F:
T I GAR D CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, AUGUST 23, 1976
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur A. Bishop; Councilmen John E. Cook, Alan W.
Mickelson, Robert C. Moore, Lynn R. Wakem; R. B. Adams,
Chief of Police; J. D. Bailey, Legal Counsel; Richard
Bolen, Planning Director; Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator;
Arline O'Leary, Administrative Assistant.
2. CONVENE BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING
(a) City Administrator reported the purpose for meeting with the Budget
Committee was to review and agree upon the wording of proposed ordinance
providing for a special city election to be held November 2, 1976. City
Administrator further reported he had been in contact with the Budget
Committee and had received consensus to recommend Council's approval
of proposed ordinance.
The Budget Committee meeting was cancelled by the City Council.
3. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
(a) No one desired to speak.
4. APPOINTMENT OF PRO 'SEM CITY RECORDER
(a) City Administrator recommended Council appoint the City Administrator
as Pro Tem City Recorder for August 23, 1976 through August 27, 1976.
(b) Motion to appoint City Admintstrator as Pro Tem City Recorder; Councilman
Moore, seconded by Councilman Wakem.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 9, 1976 and August 16, 1076
(a) Motion to approve; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
6. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND :INVESTMENTS: $21,944.62
(a) Motion to approve; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
7. MONTHLY REPORTS
Administration Finance Planning
Police Building . Library
(a) Motion to receive and file; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman
Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
8. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
John R. Skourtes, Natl. Safety Co. re: waiver of variance fee.
Blaine Whipple re: Rev. Sharing for Oregon Cities
Governor Straub re: Rev. Sharing for Oregon Cities
Jason Boe re: Land Use Survey
Memo from Planning Staff re: frontage road
U.S.A. re: Sewer Service Rate Increase
State Highway Division re: Allen Blvd. - 217 Interchange
League of Oregon Cities re: National League of Cities Annual Congress
Pat Whiting re: Rev. Sharing for Oregon Cities
(a) Council requested communication from League of Oregon Cities to be considered
under "Other" later in meeting.
(b) Motion to receive and file; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
9. SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(a) Motion by Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook to set the follow-
ing Public Hearing for September 13, 1976 commencing at 8:00 P.M.
at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room:
1. ZONE CHANGE ZC 4-75 (Bunn)
A request by Ken Bunn for general plan and program review of a
proposed residential planned development located at S.W. 109th Ave.
and S.W. Canterbury Lane (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 LOAD, Tax Lot 8800).
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
10. APPROVE REFUND DMV/R.C. MALIN - Design Review Board Fees $60.00
(a) Planning Director recommended Council's approval.
(b) Motion to approve; Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Mickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
11. RESOLUTION No. 76-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, IN BEHALF OF' THE
CITIZENRY OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY, DECLAF;ING THE CITY'S
SUPPORT OF AND REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION
OF THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
(No. 23-J) AND THE BEAVERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT (No. 48).
(a) City Administrator recommended Council's approval.
(b) Motion to approve; Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Mickelson.
(c) Discussion by Council and staff followed with regards to supporting
citizen's request to change school district boundaries. '
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
12. APPROVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
r
(a) City Administrator stated at the direction of Council, staff was submitting,
for Council adoption, specifications for a street re-surfacing program to be
submitted for federal funding.
PAGE 2 - Regular Meeting Minutes August 23, 1976
q
City Administrator recommended adoption of proposed specifications,
_ specifically deleting any reference to minimal amount of tonage, the bid
opening date and the length of streets to be resurfaced.
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem to adopt specifications
for resurfacing program, specifically deleting any reference to minimal amount
of tonage, the bid opening date and the length of streets to be resurfaced.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
13. APPROVE CONTRACT - State of Oregon - re: Mobile Home Inspection Program
(a) City Administrator recommended Council's approval to autZorize staff to
contract with State.
(b) Motion to approve; Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Cook.
(c) Discussion by Council and staff followed.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
14. ACCEPTANCE OF SAFEGUARD-PARTEX EASEMENT - Hunziker Street L.I.D.
(a) City Administrator reviewed history of attaining Easement and re-
commended Council acceptance of easement.
(b) Motion to accept easement; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman. Wakem.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
15. ORDINANCE No. 76-33 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28, OF
THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130
TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF S.W. COMMERCIAL STREET
LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
.(a) City Administrator recommended Council adoption.
(b) Motion to adopt; Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
16. ORDINANCE No. 76-34 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 74-52, TO INCLUDE A
SIGNING PROGRAM FOR THE FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Planning Director recommended Council adoption.
(b) Motion to adopt; Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson.
(c) Discussion by Council and staff followed.
(d) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to amend original
motion by changing Section 6 to Section 7 and adding a new Section 6 to
read - That the applicantis temporary leasing sign be subject to a two year
review by Council. ,
Approved motion to amend by unanimous vote of Council.
Approved, as amended, 'Ordinance No. 76-34 by unanimous vote of Council.
PAGE 3 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:00 P.M.
AV-
(a) ZONE CHANGE REQUEST: Request by Fletcher, Hansen and Parsons for a general
plan and program review of a proposed commercial-office. park Planned
Development located at the southeast corner of S.W. 72nd Ave. and S.W. Varns
Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11), Tax Lot 900).
(1) Public Hearing Opened.
(2) Planning Director summarized history of developm-nt proposed and
stated facts and findings.
Planning Director stated the Planning Commission had approved the
preliminary plan and program on July 15,1976. Planning Director
further reviewed conditions subject to Planning Corm.ission's approval.
(3) Public Testimony:
Proponents: Mr. Robert Fletcher, applicant, presented the proposed
commercial/office park planned development. Mr. Fletcher
stated a market survey showed' a defini.Le need for small
industry to have a prest.igv location such as was being
proposed.
Mr. Joachim Grube, 2040 S.W. Jefferson St. , Portland,
presented the proposed landscaping and parking plan.
Opponents: None
Cross Examiniation: None
(4) Public Hearing Closed.
(5) Discussion followed by Council, staff and applicant.
(6) Planning Director recommended Council's approval subject to the
following Conditions:
1. The signing program for the entire park be subject to Design
Review Board approval.
2. That twenty feet along SW 72nd Avc, b, dedicated for the future
widening of SW 72nd Ave to arterial standards.
3. An agreement to participate in a local i-nprovement district
for the improvement of SW 72nd to City standards to an
arterial street and the same, type of agreement be attached to
lots 9, 10 and 11 to bring Varna Street up to City local
street standards.
4. A conversant to the deeds for lots 1-8, 12 and 13 be executed
prohibiting access to SW 72nd and SW Varns St-eets. Lots
9, 10 and 11 which will have access to S.W. Varns shall be
restricted from having through access to the internal street.
5. The setback from SW 72nd Ave be 40' with a 10' intrusion
allowable for no more than 1/3 of the lot width; if no other
feasible option is available.
6. A 10' wide emergency vehicle access be provided along either
lot 10 or 11 on a pedestrian path or to be constructed with 6
inches of base rock overladen with sod and signed at both SW
Varns street and the unnamed interior road.
PAGE 4 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976
i
7. The internal street with a 20° pavement width be constructed to
j City standards for commercial streets and signed for no parking.
8. The bus turnout land be dedicated and improved as part of tr.e
SW 72nd Ave local improvement district.
t 9. Wheelchair ramps be constructed to city standards at the northwest
corner of lot 12, southwest and southeast corner of lot 13,
the northwest and northeast corner of lot 1 and the street me=dian.
i
7
i 10. A five foot utility easement 1•,e provided along all lot lines as
deeded.
11. Access to lots 2, 5, and 12 be combined with adjacF:nt lots and
access to lot 9 be combined with lot 8. Ac.ccs.. to lots 14 and
15 be provided on the north and south resp,,ctivt:Jy and
access to lots 1 and 13 be from the internal road, not the
entrance way.
12.. The storm drainage and retention system be approved by the
City Engineering Dept., Washington County Depa=rt=ment of Public
Works and the State Highway DF:pt.
13. A street opening permit onto SW 72nd be acquired from Washington
County Department of Public Works.
14. A street lighting plan to city standards be approved by P.G.E.
15. All outright permitted uses allowed in the con.•nYrcial-
professional zone be permitted and small-scale, limited research
and development type of eon-polluting industry in accordance with
the -conditional use-chapter of the Tigard Municipal Code.
16. All remaining aspects of the desvelepment be constructed to
applicable health, subdivision and zoning codes.
Planning Director f=urther recommended in order to more
clearly define the meaning of condition #15 the staff pro-
posed the following wording;
All outright permitted rises allowed in the Commercial
Professional (C-P) zone be permitted and as a conditional
use (according to chapter 18.72) �-T.all-scale:, limited re-
search and development types of non-rolluti.ng industry
of the following types:
Research and Development Laboratories including experimental ,
testing and processing facilities.
Manufacturing and Assembly of Electronic Instruments and
equipment and Electrical Devices.
Trade, Skills or Industrial Schools.
Publishing, Printing and B:okbinding Facilities.
Manufacturing of Medicines and Pharmaceuticals.
(7) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to direct
staff to prepare Ordinance for zone change request subject to the
��. . 16 conditions recommended by staff including the recommended change
in wording of condition 15.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
PAGE 5 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976
(b) RENAME EXISTING DEDICATED ROADWAYS by City of Tigard
S.W. 77th Avenue (old name) to S.W. Cf..z-;rry Drive portion lying south of
S.W. Varns Street running south to S.W. Fir Street.
S.W. Cherry Street (old name) to S.W. Cherry Dr.iv,: portion Lying south
of S.W. Fir Street running south and east to S.W. 72nd. Avenue..
S.W. Watkins Avenue (old name) to S.W. Brookside Avenue portion lying
• northeast of S.W. Walnut Street and running north ast 471 fF.et.
S. W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. Gz•e :n, Way portion lying south of
• S.W. Summerfield- Drive and running sough and we:=t 694 feet.
S.W. Post Road (old name) to S.W. Gro,�;n.s Way portion lying south of
Summerfield Drive and running so,atli and east 299 f4�t�t.
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Public Testimony - None
(3) Public Hearing Closed.
ORDINANCE No. 76-35 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF CERTAIN
ROADWAYS, HEREIN SPECIFLED, IN THE CITY OF
TIGARD, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(4) Discussion by Council and st.sff follow:d.
(5) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 76-35, Cc,::rciisndn Cook, econded
by Councilman Mickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote. of Council .
(c) DESIGN REVIEW - Review by the City Council of a Design R,vir•w Board
decision on July 27, 1976, approving a r:.qt :-st t,y At,',--Is Lard Company to
construct a 16,000 square foot industrial h—iAdI nz; at 93$0 S.W. Tigard St.
(1) Public Hearing Opened
(2) Planning Director stated tY.- D ;=izn R>:vi .w Bard had spproved
Atlas Land Company's request subjt.ct to a standard non rt:monstrance
agreement, but not including a :staff r,:coaTn�-.nd,;d 10' dedication
on Tigard Street.
Planning Director further stated Mr.. Allred, of Atlas Land
Company, objected specifically to tin: condition rf providing a
10' right-of-way to the City and t}aat 0� purpose of the: hearing
by Council was to consider whet1h,;r ttis City : h.ould requiie the
10' dedication omitted by the DF�sign Rc-v.i_w Board.
(3) Public Testimony: Mr. Doug Allred, Atlas Land Company, stated he
objected to being forc A to donatF a 10'
right-of-way in order to c;; abler to construct
an industrial bailding on a site already zoned
for that type of construction.
(4) Public Hearing Closed.
(5) Discussion by Council,• staff and Legal Coun -1 followEA.
Legal Counsel stated power can 1.,e de!egat.ed to Design Review
Board to enforce the non-remonstrance how,--ver City
(_ Council has not allocated that powar 1y Ordinance at this time.
` Mr. Allred stated no one- had asked him if ire would donate the
land.
PAGE 6 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976
(6) Motion to deny appeal; CouncilmaZ M.00r ;, �cnd._d ty Councilman
Wakem.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(7) Mr, Allred stated he would voluntar.il;, dcnatc thr 10' eight-of-way.
18. ORDINANCE No. 76-36 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL, CITY ELECTION TO BE
HELD IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, ORE-ON, ON NOVEMBER. 2, 1976,
IN CONNECTION WITH THE REGULAR s^ENERAL STATE ELECTION, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THF LEGAL VOTERS OF THE CITY
OF TIGARD, OREGON, THE QUESTION OF ESTABLISHING A NEW
TAX BASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 11, ARTICLE X1, CONSTI.TUTION
OF THE STATE OF OREGON AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(a) City Administrator recommended Ccuncll's tjuption.
(b) Motion to adopt; Councilman Mickelson, ,<:cond_.d h�, C%,unci 1.an Ctok.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
19. OTHER:
(a) STREET SWEEPER USE POLICY
City Administrator stated the curr,,nt pol ic; wi.s t<: �w _.p p�;t.l is way only
with the exception of public schools.
City Administrator further stated St..Ant., ro ':�, Sc' c, ,l had riqur- t;-d tht,ir
parking lot be swept.
Discussion followed by Council and staff.
Motion to deny request; Councilman Wak%—, st t.-r&; d l.y Counc i.l.rran Moore.
Failed by 3 nay votes to 2 aye votc.S, Ccmoll-tn Wakem and Moore
voting aye.
Motion by Councilman Mickelson, secondr.d t; Councilman Ccok to sw;.tp St.
Anthony's School parking lot one timc., only.
Approved by 3 aye votes to 2 nay vots;S, Co .n: : r:-;, Wik.f:m ac.d Mor,rs
voting nay.
(b) STATUS REPORT:
Tigard Lumber Company Building - Cit; Administrator stit-:d h2 had c.hf�cked
plans that show several buildings that wf.,rt: Z-ppo_.:d to he r,:moved within
18 months as a condition of the conditional u;•:; apprc;val granted 11/21/72.
City Administrator further stated he mad_: pt�rsvral contact with Mr. Ait.k:en,
August 19th to encourage voluntary compliarr,_;. City Administrator state
id
Mr. Aitken indicated he would give a &,finitf. answf-r, as to what his plans
were, within the next week.
Utility Equipment - Display of Equipment - City Administrator stated staff
can not find any outright violation of Cit; Ordinanc,_ regarding a utility
truck with a "for sale" sign on private property,
Pest Control - City Administrator reported Paramount Pest Control had two
C.
trucks with crews working the City every Friday spraying for mosquitoes.
Administrator further reported Paramount was an wer.ing complaint calls with
regards to yellow jackets and wasps.
PAGE 7 - Regular Meeting Minutes - August 23, 1976
i
(c) Skourtes Refund Request - Planning Director surnrmarized the history of
the variance Mr. Skourtes applied for. Planning Director further
recommended refund request be denied.
Discussion followed by Council and staff.
Motion to deny refund request; Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman
Mickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(d) Planning Commission Study Session on Statewide Planning - August 31st -
City Administrator recommended Council attend study session to be held
at 7:30 P.M. in Tuality Junior High lecture room.
(e) National League of Cities - Annual Congress - City Administrator called
Council's attention to letter from League of Oregon Citis:s.
Council directed staff to make reservations for two members of Council
to be part of the Oregon delegation to attend the Annual Congress.
(f) Buglary Prevention Program - City Administrator requested Council to
authorize execution of an agreement addendum to cover the current in-
volvement in the Burglary Prevention program.
Motion by Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Wakem to authorize Mayor and
City Recorder to execute agreement.
Approved by uanimous vote of Council.
(g) Ap2roval of additional expenditure: 42.80 - City Administrator stated there
had been sewer backup on a weekend at 9435 S.W. View Terrace and Canyon
Road Plumbing had been called to do the work for the homeowner. However,
the sewer blockage was in the public main and therefore was a City
responsibility. In as much as there was no property damage, insurance
could not cover costs. Administrator recommended approval of expenditure.
Motion to approve; Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(h) City Administrator called Council's attention to memo from Rick Daniels,
Associate Planner, in regards to S.W. Pacific Highway frontage road near
S.W. Park Street. City Administrator reco!amended Council's approval
for staff to petition the Transportation Commission to change jurisdiction
of the road to the City of Tigard.
Council consensus was for staff to proceed.
(i) Council concurred to set next regular meeting for September 13th.
20. ADJOURNMENT 10:10 P.M.
City Recorder, Pro-Tem
QhTESTr
ICA
Mayor
_PAGE_,8_�,,: Regular Meeting Minutes August 23, 1976
BILLS PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT
AUGUST 23, 1976
_AERAL FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
19409 Petty Cash - Misc. Office Supplies & Subsistence (10) 14.00 $ 72.22
(11) .11 (12) 41.29 (14) .75 (14.1) 10.00 (16) 6.07
19410 Tigard Community Youth Center - Advance on Tax Receipts (22) 1622) 400 .00
.00
19412 Williams & Sons - Refund (
(114)4)
50.00
19413 Larry Svart - Institute on Planning (613) 109.75
19448 U. S. Bank - Federal Withholdings
19449 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (11) 4.89 182.69
(12) 16.99 (13) 8.00 (14) 9.49 (16) 135.19 (16.2) 8.13
19450 League of Oregon Cities - Kaiser (11) 49.31 (12) 121.27 (13) 127.40 1 090.15
(14) 96.76 (14.1) 74.11 (16) 516.52 (16.2) 68.70 (616B) 3608
19451 League of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross (10) 205.47 (13) 72.59 918.81
(14) 60.29 (16) 567.90 (616A) 12.56 (11) 432.00
19452 Anthony Pelay - Judge (18) 2.50
19453 Otto Sorg - Rent
19454 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (10) 1.65 (11) .55 (12) 1.10 17.60
(13) 1.65 (14) 1.65 (16) 10.45 (16.3) .55 (11) 9.80
19455 Becky Kieivel - Witness Fee (11) 6.28
19456 Phyllis Hallebaugh - Witness Fee (11) 8.84
19457 Ronald Bush - Witness Fee (11) 30.00
19458 State of Oregon - License Suspension 33.84
19459 A-Boy West - Plumbing Supplies (15) 1.19 (15.1) 14.95 (18) 17.70
19460 Balsiger - Peterson Shewbridge & Assoc. - 4 Sepias Tigard (19) 14.00
Storage Building (16) 42.34
19461 Mr. C's Camera Co. - Film & processing (16) 75.00
19462 Cole's Publication - Reverse Directory (19) 7.04
19463 Doug's Auto Parts - Misc. Auto Supplies (14) 31.00
19464 General Binding Corp. - 3/4" Cerlox
19465 General Telephone - Utility (15) 23.68 (16) 436.33 (18) 370.77 859.11
(20) 28.33 (16) 13.95
19466 Harris Uniforms Shirt - Landis (16) 27.00
19467 Identi-Kit Co. - Rental (14) 19.35
19468 I.B.M. Company - Ribbons 68.75
19469 Legislative Counsel Com. - Crime Code Bks of Oregon (20) 40.00
19470 Maryatt Industries - Laundry
19471 Multnomah County - Office Supplies (10) 17.88 (11) 1.00 (12) 8.04
(13) 4.07 (14) 54.66 (14.1) 37.67 (15) 2.60 (16) 45.48 (19) 3.44 191.55
(18) 16.71 (16) 29.95
19472 Nudelman Bros. - Reserve Uniforms (14) 2.00
19473 Oregon Assoc. of Nurseryman - Publication (12) 5.00
19474 Oregon Sec. Intl City Mgr. Assoc. - Dues 102.45
19475 The Oregonian Publishing Co. - Advertising (14) 24.45 (20) 78.00 (13) 70.80
19476 Peter's Office Supply - File Jackets 668.91
19477 P.G.E. - Utility (15) 30.94 (16) 67.47 (18) 558.71 (20) 11.79 (20) 45.36
19478 Portland Road & Driveway - Cold Mix (16) 22.36
19479 Print-Right - Property Cards 27.70
19480 Rentex - Laundry (15) 6.45 (16) 7.75 (18) 13.50
19481 Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor & Bailey - Legal Fees (July, 1976) 1,192.00
(11) 170.00 (18) 372.00 (20.2) 650.00
r_ 82 Southwest Office Supplies - Misc. (14.1) 1.77 (15) 4.35 (16) 10.07 21.79
` (19) 4.50 62.58
19483 Territorial Enforcement Sup. - Fingerprint Supplies (16j 1.01
19484 J. Thayer & Co. - Misc. Office Supplies (18) .01 (14.1) 1.00 41.83
19485 Don Thomas Petroleum - Shell Gasoline (19) 23.20 (12) 18.63
0
1 Page 2
Bills Payable
August 23, 1976
GENE FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK (.cont.)
Check No. 10.40
19486 Tigard Lumber & Bldg. Supplies - Misc. Bldg. Supplies (15) $
o' .87 Times Publication - Notice of Public Hearings & Abandoned Property 133.70
Auction (10) 27.75 (14) 21.95 (16) 84.00
19488 Tuality Community Hopsital - Costs incurred during arrest (16) 27.50
19489 Vic Alfonso Ford - Door Hinge #1 (16) 10.34
19490 Valley Communications - Radio Maint. Agreement (16) 149.00
19491 Xerox - Equipment Rental (10) 72.85 (11) 2.36 (12) 30.01
(13) 13.81 (14) 173.36 (14.1) 2.84 (15) .71 (16) 200.51 (19) 19.42 515.87
Total. General Fund $ 8.894.06
SEWER FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No. 23.94
19449 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (105) $ 117.29
19450 League of Oregon Cities - Kaiser (103)
19451 League of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross (103) 92.50
19454 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (106) 2.20
19481 Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor & Bailey - July Legal Fees ( 240.00
3225 Chester Curry - Sewer Permit Refund (7753)53) 235.00
Total Sewer Fund $ 710.93
BA14CROFT ASSESSMENT FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
4073 U. S. Bank - Bonds (il) $ 3,000.00
4075 U. S. Bank - Bonds & Interest (11-850) 479.96 (11-851) 749.40 1,229.36
4076 U. S. Bank - Interest (11) 615.00
Total Bancroft Fund $ 4,844.36
STATE TAX STREET FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
19409 Petty Cash - Misc. Office Supplies (220) $ 1.75
19448 U. S. Bank - Federal Withholding (613) 55.90
19449 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (105) 23.93
19450 League of Oregon Cities - Kaiser (103) 117.28 (616B) 8.26 125.54
19451 League of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross (103) 92.53 (616A) 8.14 100.67
19454 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (106) 2.20
19459 A-Boy West - Misc. Plumbing Supplies (220) 16.24
19463 Doug's Auto Parts - Gate Hose Extra Charge (220) .50
19477 P.G.E. - Utility (260) 174.87 (282) 4,405.64 4,580.51
19485 Don Thomas Petroleum - Shell Gasoline (210 152.79
19486 Tigard Lumber & Bldg. Supply - Misc. Bldg. Supplies (210) 6.73
(220) 208.33 (284) 34.85 249.91
19490 Valley Communications - Radio Maint. Agreement (2 24.50
4074 Tigard Water District - Utility (26600) 1 .00
17
4091 Baltz & Son Co. - Parts for Lawn Mower (240) 17.30
4092 Contel Corp. - Cone Rental (284) 36.00
4093 Casey Tractor & Equip. - Mower Blade (240) 18.75
4095 Elmer's Flag & Banner - New Flag - Cook Park (220) 26.70
4098 Marine Lumber - Misc. Bldg. Supplies (220) 76.45 (240) 1.66 78.11
4099 Miller's Automotive - 69 Pickup Clutch & Spring repair (210) 108.25
4100 Oregon Toro - Repair Parts Lawn Mower (240) 16.55
4101 Phillips Sanitary Service - Toilet Rental (214) 45.00
[)'n2 Power Rents - Drill Rental (220) 6.50
State Tax Street Fund Total 5,835_60
� f
Page 3
Bills Payable
r �
August 23, 1976
p
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
409 Petty Cash - Misc. Office Supplies (16) 1.36 (21) 3.00 $ 4.36
9448 U:::'S.-Baiik.-,Federal'Withholding (613) (35.90)
19449 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (15) 7.09 (21) 17.28 24.37
19451 League of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross (15) 60.29 (21) 145.18 205.47
19454 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (15) .55 (21) 1.10 1.65
19453 Otto Sorg - Library Rent (15) 238.00
19468 I.B.M. Corp. - Typewriter (18) 693.00
19471 Multnomah County - Misc. Office Supply (21) 6.27
19475 Oregonian Publishing Co. - Advertising (21) 13.65
19485 Don Thomas Petroleum - Shell Gasoline (16) 385.04
i 19491 Xerox - Equipment Rental (21) 16.58
4090 Roger Thomssen - Recording (21) 6.00
4094 Double Day Literary Guild - 2 books (15) 7.39
4096 Fred Bay News - 43 books (15) 77.89
4097 J. K. Gill - Binder (21) 15.90
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund Total$ 1.659.67
Total Bills Payable $21.944.62
August 19, 1976
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: City Administrator
Subject: Monthly Report - Administration
Noise Abatement - Since the monthly report presented two weeks ago, we have received
a sound level meter on loan for 30 days from the Federal Environmental Protection
Agency in Seattle. We also were successful in getting a D.E.Q. staff member to
check a specific problem area previously identified. This site was found to be
in violation of our Code. We are attempting to attain voluntary compliance as a
first step.
Personnel - As announced on Monday, the 16th, Mr. Theron L. Martin, 52, has
accepted our offer of employment as Director of Public Works. Theron, who perfers
to be known as "Marty", is expected to start work on Tuesday, the 24th, and is
expected to be of immense assistance by providing expert direction and organizational
leadership to the Public Works Department and also to Council and this office.
Jeanette Newton, police dispatcher, has resigned from City employment as of August
28th, leaving us with another vacancy in this position.
Janet Lewis, a citizen who was instrumental in bringing about the Walnut Street
pathway, will commence work for the City in September on an hourly basis, attaining
necessary easements for our voter approved sidewalk and pathway program.
Financial - As we enter the 3rd week of the second month of this fiscal year, we
are still struggling to simultaneously prepare and print the adopted budget,
finish closing the books on last year, provide the necessary information and time
to the Auditors and to program expenditures and work for this current year.
Hunziker Street - Kearney is expected to commence work on the storm drainage
installation now that the pipe has been received. At this point, it appears that
our initial concerns over the quality of paving may have been unfounded. We have
asked the project engineer to review the test results and report to us on this matter.
Time is running short for the creation of the final assessment roll and the selling
of bonds by December.
Sanitary Sewers - The contract amendment that will continue the Inflow and Infiltra-
tion Program has been sent to Geico but has not been received back as yet. In
the meantime, U.S.A. has been televising every line within 50 feet of their
interceptor trunk line in order that we may ascertain if any damage has been done
to our lines in the area. We required this as a first step toward releasing them
from damage claims by the City.
Interagency Coordination - Extensive meetings have been held with D.M.V.
representatives in an effort to assist them in locating a suitable Tigard site.
Other meetings have been held with Port of Portland on economic development
assistance, Washington. County and Unified Sewerage Agency on E.D.A. grant applications,
t C.R.A.G., CE2, C.E.T.A. .and H.U.D. on our HCD application.. Oh yes, since the last
report, City staff at all levels had some involvement with something called Town
& Country Days.
l
Memo - to City Council -2- 8-19-76
_ Intra Agency - The Planning Commission has requested staff to provide a study
session presentation regarding L.C.D.C. and Statewide Planning. A copy of the
agenda is included in your packet and all Councilmen would be well-advised to attend.
General - July and August have been extremely busy months and it appears that we
will have to work very diligently to keep previously approved and current projects
on a timetable that will Lead to timely conclusion.
rte`
i
6 POLICE DEPARTMENT
CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT
FOR
MONTH OF JULY 19 76
DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL
AVERAGE
NUMERICAL STRENGTH DAILY ABSENCE L AVERAGE EF£ECIIVE STRENGTH
End of Same This Same This Last Same
this Month Month Month Month Month i Mc.nth
Month Last - Last Last
Year Year Year
TOTAL PERSONNEL 22 22 8.7 9.4 13.3 -' 14.8 -- 12.6 -_
CHIEF'S OFFICE 2 2 .9 1.2 1.1 11.2 Y.8 _
SERVICES DIV IS. 4 6 1.1 _2_5_M _2.9_- 3.9 _ i _3.5
PATROL DIVISION 13 11 5.7 4.7 7.3 7.7 - -6.3 -
TRAFFIC DIVIS. -------- ------------------ -------- ----- -_ _ ------------
INVEST.
_ - - -INVEST. SECTION 3 31.0 1 1.2 2.0 2.0 1.8
FORCE ONE 10 9 3.6 3.1 i 6.4 6.9 5.9__.__�
FORCE TWO 6 7 2.7 _3.3 3.3 4.2 _ 3.7
FORCE THREE 6 62.4 3.0 �� 3.6 3.7 3.0
CHANGES IN PERSONNEL DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH
1. Present for duty end of last month 24 This -Mon Lh
2. Recruited during month 0 Month Last Year
3. Reinstated during month 0 1. Total number field
Total to account for 24 officers 13 11
2. Less Agents As.,ig-
4. Separations frAm the service: ned to Investigat. 0 0
(a) Voluntary resignation 1 3. Average daily abs-
(b) Retirement 0 ences of field off-
icers owing to:
(c) Resigned with charges pending 0 (a) Vacation, susp-
(d) Dropped during probation 0 ension, days off,
comp, time, etc.. 5.5 4.5
(e) Dismissed for cause 1 (b) Sick d Injured .2 2
(f) Killed in line of duty 0 (c) Schools, etc.
(g) Deceased 0 Total average daily
absences 5.7 4.7
Total separations 2 4, Available for duty 7.3 6.3
'resent for duty at end of month 22
{• CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
THIS SAME MONTH TOTAL TOTAL jOffenses MONTH LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
CLASS I 53 67 493 511
CLASS II 43 58
MISC. NON-CRIMINAL 506 406 2,-
Cases
Cases Cleared by Arrest
CLASS I 13 24 116 125
(CLASS II 15 28 196 233
INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION
CASES RECEIVED 84 119 818 745
# CASES CLEARED 27 41 248 235
# CASES SUSPENDED 36 66 367 372
# CASES ASSIGNED 41 56 355 380
PROPERTY
PROPERTY LOSS 19.439.34 12 674.86 148 602.33 108 390.79
PROPERTY RECOVERED 7,862.45 1,617.91 1 62,023.69 38,897.40
TRAFFIC & ACCIDENT ACTIVITY
ACCIDENTS 18 1 19 164 L 166
INJURIES 6 6 50 41
CITATIONS ISSUED 73 76 677 864
VEHICLE OPERATION
TOTAL MILEAGE 13.148 14,831 104 249 110.405
/CAST DFA MILE 7.39g- 8,53c 11,12C �8.67c
PATROL DIVISION
TOTAL HOURS 1.680.0 1 564 0 12.124.4 6 7
OBLIGATED HOURS 1 753 6,772.7 76
NON-OBLIGATED HOURS 641.9 810.8 5 5 7 5,683.3
SERVICES DIVISION
TOTAL HOURS 708.0 1 869.5 6.063.0 5,801.0
TOTAL DISPATCH HOURS 251.1 301.9 2,104.0 2,098.1
TOTAL TELETYPE HOURS 63.7 75.1 551.3 610.7
CLERICAL DUTIES HOURS 352 7 441,5 2,883,1 2,759.9 -
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
CRIME INDEX AND POLICE ACTIVITY TREND
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
OFFENSES UNFOUNDED NUMBER OF ' NUMBER OF OFFENSES ! NUMBER OF
CLASSIFICATION REPORTED OFFENSES ACTUAL CLEARED BY ARPeST i OFFENSES
OF OFFENSES THIS REPORTED OFFENSES THIS MOWfH BY
(PART I) MONTH THIS MONTH THIS MONTH TOTAL ARREST OF JUVENILES
ARRE. JUVENILES THIS MONTH
1, CRIMINAL HOMICIDE � `--
a. Murder & Nonnegligent
Manslaughter
b. Manslaughter by -- --
Ne l.i ence
2. FORCIBLE RAPE --
a. Rape by Force i
b. Assault to Rape
Attempts
3. ROBBERY - - ---
a. Armed - Any Weapon
b. Strong Arm - No
Weapons
4. ASSAULT - Total / 7 -�---
a. Gun 2 2
b. Knife or Cutting
Instrument
c. Other Dangerous
Weapon 1 1
d. Hands, Fists, Feet,
etc. - Aggravated
e. Other Assaults - Not
Aggravated 4 4 1 2
5. BURGLARY - Total r 7 /
a. Forcible Entry 4 4 1 1
b. Unlawful Entry - No --
Force 3 3
c. Attempted Forcible -
Entry
6, LARCENY - THEFT
(except Auto Theft)
a. 50 and Over in Value 19 19 1 5 1 5
b. Under $50 in
Value 17 1 16 1 3 1 3
7. AUTO THEFT
5 1 4 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 55 2 53 1 6 131 4 10
SUMMARY OF ARRESTS SUMMARY OF CRIMINAL .ACTIVITY
ADULTS: Male 2 Month Month Year Year.
Female 0 1976 1975 1976 1975
C Total PART I 53 67 493 511
PART Ii 43 58 4434 475
JUV: Male 4 MISC. NON-CRIM 506 406 2.827 2
Totale 4 GRAND TOTAL 602 531 F3,754 3,353
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
CRIME INDEX AND POLICE ACTIVITY 'TREND
(1) (2) (3) (4) _ T (.5) (6)__
OFFENSES UNFOUNDED NUMBER OF i NUMBER OF OFFENSES NUMBER OF
CLASSIFICATIONS REPORTED OFFENSES ACTUAL CLEARED BY AR .rI OFFENSES
I
OF OFFENSES __
THIS REPORTED OFFENSES THIS M BY
(PART II) MONTH THIS MONTH THIS MONTH TOTAL ARREST OF JUVENILES
ARR JUVENILE_ THIS MONTH
8. HARRASSMENT 4 4 _
9. ARSON 2 2�_
10. FORGERY & COUNTER-
FEITING 1 1
11. FRAUD 12 i� _12 _ 1 2
12. EMBEZZLEMENT
1.3. STOLEN PROPERTY: BUYING i
RECEIVING; POSSESSING __--
14. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF 11 f 11 — 3 2 —_3_—_� _-
15. WEAPONS: CARRYING,
POSSESSING. ETC. —_—__—_ _ --___—_ -----—_
16. PROSTITUTION &
COMMERCIALIZED VICE
17. SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT
2 AND 6) _--
18. NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 3 3 4 3 1 1
19. GAMBLING —_ —
20. OFFENSES AGAINST THE
FAMILY AND CHILDREN
21. DRIVING UNDER THE
INFLUENCE
22. LIQUOR LAWS 1 1 1 1 —
23. DRUNKENESS
24. DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 1 1 1
25. VAGRANCY
26. ALL OTHER OFFENSES
(EXCEPT TRAFFIC) 2 2 1 2
27. SUSPICION
28. CURFEW AND LOITERING 1 1 2 1 2 1
29. RUN AWAYS 4 4 1 � �1
TOTAL 43 43 14 15 7 5
SUMMARY OF ARRESTS
C 'ILTS: Male 4 JUVENILES: Male 7
Female 3 Female 0
Total Total 7
Page three
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
MISCELLANEOUS COMPLAINTS_& ACTIVITIES
' �NUM.BER~- � NUMBER - -NUMBER OF
NON-CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS REPORTED UNFOUNDED ACTUAL COMPLAINTS
_ THIS MONTH fj _-THIS MONTH _ THIS MONTH-�-_
1. Alarm 25 - � ------- _ - _--__ 25___-____ _
2. Ambulance/First Aid 7 1 -_6_______-_
3. Animal Problem 27 _ -_ _ __- 1 -27
4. Assist Agenev 33 _ _--- _ i-i_-_ -_ 33
4A. Assist Citizen 35_ _ _ _ 7 - - 35 -
5. Check Building 14 --_- t _ 14
6. Check Occupant ______- __---
7. Civil. Matter 15 15_
-_---�- t___-_
8. Deliver Message 5 _ _
9. Dog Bite 11
10. Disturbance 37 - - 37 -- _
11. Hazard t 5 _ 5
12. Juvenile Problem _ 2626 _--_-_
13. Noise Abated 25 _ - 25
1.4, Parson 5 -- - __---_ i--_--_-_---
5
15. Standby on Moveou t
16. Suspicious Circumstances _ 53 _- 2
17. Towed Auto 4___
18. Traffic Problem 19
19. Unfounded Call 5 _ Y 5 --_
20. Wire Down _ 1 i 1 --__
21. Other 18 18
22. Found Property 14 _ 14____�
23. Lost Property -?_ -_Y_2__---
24. FIR's -_ -____------- ------60 ---
25. Narcotics Information
26. Lewd/Harassment Phone Calls (REFER TO PART 11 CRIMES
27. Traffic. Arrest Report; 7 _ 7 _
28. Vacation Checks/Prowl Checb.s 50 _ -__-_ _- 50
29. Warrants, Subpoenas, Summons Served 3 -_-- _ - 3_-
30. Drunk Person(s) 2 __- 2 -
31. Famil Fights 7 -_---1_--- 7 - _
32. Fires
33. Lost avid Missing Persons -
34. Prowlers
35. Suicides and Attempts 1 _1
36. Suspicious Autos 1 i1 1
TOTALS 509 3 506
PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED
Type of Property Value of Property Stolen
Stolen Recovered
A. Currency, Notes, etc.............. ..... ..... .....$ 4,035.55 $
B. Jewelry and Precious Metals....... ....... ........$ 1,287.00 $
C. Furs.............................. ...... .........S S_
D. Clothing......... ......... . ...... ..... . .........$ $
( Locally Stolen Automobiles. ............. ....... ..$ 8,902.50 $ 71252.50
F. Miscellaneous........ .... ............... ..... ....$ 5,214.29 $_i 609.95
TOTALS...... ..$ 192439.34 $ 7,862.45
Page four
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
VALUE OF PROPERTY .STOLEN
NUMBER OF VALUE OF
CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL PROPERTY STOLEN
OFFENSES
ROBBERY -- ---� --r'---
A. Highway (streets, alleys, etc,),
B. Commercial House (except C, D, F)....... .... ...
C. Gas or Service Station.. .... ... .... . I..... . ....D. Chain Store. ., •
.. . . .. . .I .. .. .......... "..
E. Residence (anywhereon premises).... . ....... ...
F. Bank........... ................ . ......... ...... $
G. Miscellaneous.. ... .. �— S_—
TOTAL - ROBBERY 0
BURGLARY - BREAKING OR ENTERING
A. Residence (dwelling)
1) Night.... ............ .. . ..... ......... ....." _ 2 _ x1,126-.00
2) Day...... ... ... .. ... ... ..................... 1 > 180.00
3) Unknown.. . ... ... . ... .. ....... ------ -------------
B. Nonresidence (store, office, ctc.) '— -'---`-"
1) Night.... .............. . .... . . .. . ... . . . .. . . . 3 $ 2,242_55
2 Da ........ ........ ... . .. ... ....... ..... ...
3) Unknown.. ... ... ...... ... ........... ...... .
TOTAL - BURGLARY 7_
LARCENY - THEFT (except auto, by value)
A. $50 and over... ... ..... .. .......,,.... . ....... .. 19 $'-
—6.714.45_
B. $5 to $50...... ... ........ ...... ... .. ... ....... �10 $ ^' _ 266.75_
C. Under $5... . . ... . .......... . . ..... ..... ..... _ b $— —_7.09
TOTAL LARCENY �_ $r 6.988. 9
AUTOTHEFT........ .. ........ ....... . ... .. ... .... .. . 4 $ 81902.5O
GRAND TOTAL $ 19,439.34
Nature of Larcenies
A. Pocket-picking. . ...... . . ... ...... .. ..... . .. . $
B. Purse-snatching........ ...... ........... . ... $ -
C. Shoplifting....,... 5
D. From From Autos (except E).. 8 $ _ 3,483.85
E. Auto Parts and Accessories........ ........ ... 6 $ 290.00
F. Bicycles.. ... 4 $ 215,00
G. From Buildings (except C and H).. ... .... .... 4� $ 1.133.00
H. From any Coin-operated Machine........... ... $
I. All Other... ..... .................. ... 8 $ 1.272,45
TOTAL - LARCENIES 35 $__ 6.988.29
Automobiles Recovered
A. Number Stolen Locally and Recovered Locally........... ........... ....
B. Number Stolen Locally and Recovered by Other Jurisdictions.... . ...... 2
C. Total Locally Stolen Autos Recovered.......... .. .... ....... ., 2'
D. Number Stolen Out of Town, Recovered Locally............ 0
page five
a
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
TRAFFIC/ACCIDENT SUMMARY —�-�-�__---� -
ACCIDENTS THIS MONTH _ THIS_ YEAR TO DATE_____ _
This Year Last year _ Thi4lear i— — L.asu Year
ACCIDENT TOTAL 18 19 Y�164 — , 166
Fatal 0 0 1 _—_+T _ — 0- -
Personal Injury 6 6 50 _ — _ _ _ -41-__ _
Property Damage 2 3 23 — -- 23 -�
Pedestrian 0
Hit and Run 6 0 - 2 ----_—__ --_�_1�—�_
ENFORCEMENT
_TRAFFIC TOTAL 73 76 �677 i —_ 856
Hazardous Violations 54 52
Other Violations 19 24 131 --�— _243
Parking 13 15 67 _ 147----
DWI
47 --DWI 0 149 _-1
Hit and Run 1 0 _ _4 —_ 4
Arrests, Citations or — '--- -r—`--------
Custody atAccidents 1 12 �I Y 77 !- 86
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE REPORT
Operational Cost Summary
UNIT # 1 5.83 Cents Per. Mile. $ 55.89 9.12 MPG
UNIT # 2 5.P2 _Cents Per Mile S_223,55 _— -_ 8.31 MPG
UNIT # 3 7.20 Cents Per. Mile $ 113,45 _ 7.27 _MPG
UNIT #__zL_ 7.80 Cents Per Mile $ 11.87 8.21 �M116
UNIT ���_ 5.24 Cents Per. Mile $ 212,28 9.38 MPG
UNIT 4d�_ 32.38 Cents Per Mile $ 287,62—_ 10,12- MPG
UNIT # 7 3.85 Cents Per Mile $ 67.43 13.30 MPG
UNIT # 8 0 Cents Per Mile $ 0 0 MPG
UNIT # Cents Per Mile 5 MPG
UNIT # Cents Per Mile $ MPG
TOTAL OPERATING COST $ 972.06
TOTAL MILES TRAVELED 13,148
AVERAGE COST PER MILE 7.39C
page six
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
PATROL DIVISION
ACTIVITY .TIME ALLOTMENT - HOURS QUANTITY
y<.General Patrol................ ... .......• 424.3. ----
�-4Traffic Patrol;.................... ... .. 106.9 ---- —�
Criminal Investigat-ion....... ... . ..••••• _!97_, ------------
Accident Investigation.......... . ... ... . 9.8 __-_-
Traffic Enforcement....... ... . ...... ... . —__33.8 __—
Court and Jail......... ....... . . . .. . .... 15.6 -----------
Transport Prisoners.o............ .b..... _�6.7 —__
^' Assist Public.... o .o*6 4 6 e 0 o*e a o .o o o o.o _33.6 _--------
Assist Other Agencies... ........... ..... 7.7
Assist Other Officers..... .......... .... _33.2
Calls Answered.. .—. ........... . .. . . . ... __-134.2
F.I.R.'s.. . .. ... . . ... . .... .... . . . .. . .... ._____3o7_ ----------
Dispatch Dutics. . . . ... ... . .... .. . .. . ....• _—166.0 ---------
office Duties Duties / Briefing.... . ... . ....... .---_25.3 _--_---_-,
Report Writing.. .......... ... ... . . .. ..... _—109.1 ------------
Special Details. . .. . ... .. ... ... ...... ... --------
Training.. .................. ... .. ... .. .. 182.4 _---------
Patrol Vehicle Service........ . ... ... ... 32.2
yAutborized Breaks. ...... ..... . .. .. . ....
Vacation Checks.....:.. . . .... .... . ....
. Vehicle Impound—. ......... ... .. .. ..... 0.8 ---------
Administrative Duties.. .. .... .. . .. ...... _—_47.0
'DOTAL HOURS. . .. . ... ... ... . ..e 1660.0
Total Obligated Hours _ 1038.1
Total Non-Obligated Hours 641_9_
page seven
i
p
s
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
PATROL DIVISION
Page 2
TRAFFIC Quantity
Hazardous Violations...................................... --48
Operator License Violations... ......... ... .. .............. —7
Suspended Violations........................ .............. 3
Vehicle License Violations................................ 12
Equipment Violations.. .............. ..... . ........... ..... 0
Hitand Run.,......o...o.....—.......... .. .............. 1
D.U.I.L.L............. ... ...... . ...... .......... ....,. ..... i 2
Parking Violations..... ....................... ....... ..... 13
TOTALCITATIONS..................... ............. ......... 86
TOTALWARNINGS.. ... ...................... ... ..... ........ 74
CRIMINAL ARRESTS
Felony...... ....... ............. ................. ... .....
Misdemeanor / Traffic ................... ...... ..... ...... 21
TOTAL... .................................. ....... . ....... 2Lt
PREVENTION
Open Windows......................................... ..... 5
Open Doors.......................... ...................... 7
Street Lights .... ................................... .. ... 0
Suspicious Persons............. .................. ....... .. 130
Suspicious Vehicles............................ ......... .. 261
Signals Out.............. ............................... .. 5
Signs Down.......................................... .. .... 6
Neglected Property............................. ... ........ _rL
Street Defects....................................... ..... 10
Dead Animal.............................. ................. 1
Abandoned Vehicles.................. ...................... 7
Fires.................................... ............ ..... 3
Other Hazards ................ ......................... ... 10
Vacation Checks.........>........<........................ 0
TOTAL.......................................... ...........
450
page eight
i
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
PATROL_DIVISION
_ Page 3
-- --� SLSPI.CIOUS --SVEHICLESS-
-FFICER CITATIONS _EARNINGS _ARRESTS _- PERSONS —
O - 8
OFF. KILLION 5 --3 _---
OFF. deBRAUWERE 3 �—-- 2---- ----- 18 -----
6
OFF. IANDIS
---__— --
q -21 ---- --- ---- 20 -64
--------- 11 ----
1 15
OFF. NEWMAN 0 ---------
12
CFF.
------
OFF. FEATHE RSTON 22_-_- _-_ 17 3 --- - ---------
---
57
_-_ -
-- s 4----- ----- 15 ------1-------
___.__ 15 ^--- 1 _
OFF -_- -
- -- ----- ------o ------ - ---3--------
OFF. Sl IANNI - 11 _-- _---- 0----T- - 0
0
OFF._HAUNSP'ERGER _ -------
SGT NEWMAN -----�- 0 - ------ 0 -------0------
-----2------- 2
_ 0 --------- ----------------
SGT._ _W_H_E_EL_ER _ ----�--- -----_SGT. JENN INGS --- ------2- 3
OFF. MARTIN _---
- 130 - 261 _
PATROL TOTAL 84 _ -
24 ---_— ___---
_ - _---- - --- =---3=_---_ ---- -- - -
—_.__� ------- - HOURS
_ RESERVES -_�------ ----___._ ------ ----------- ----------------- ------- -- 85
HESKETH __
TETFAS ---.-.------ -----
�- --------- -- ---3----- - 1 19
-
F ISH ER - - 1 - 39-
5
GILL 42
WOMACK --- -- -
15
-------------- -- ----
_ M_ILLEH:-- --------------- - 13
-----
_-HAMMES-
_-2 -- --------- 47
---- -------------- -
--SWEET _ .-�------.._..--- ----•---------
ST L�iLER ------------ ------------- 35
------ -----_____ ___------- -------------I -°---
_______________
7
-- - _- -- - - 375
-- 6 0IR
E,S F Rl E TOTAL --- —---- — — - -- --
t ------ S6 80 24 140 _-_--268 --- -_ - --
bb
page nine
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
TRAFFIC REPORT
Conviction Ratio
Citations
Officer Issued Guilty Not. Guilty_ Pendin^ Ratio
1. SGT, JENNINGS 3 2. 1 .100%
2. SIRIANNI 6 4 _ 2 100%_
3. NEWMAN 12 6 6 100%
4. FEATHERSTON 21 2 19 100%
5. MERRILL 6 2 _ 4 _ 100 _
6. MRTIN 4 1 _ 3 100%
7. JOHNSON 4 1 2 50"
8. SGT. WliEELER 2 1 100%
9. 8 100%
10. KILLION 10 4 6 100%
11. SGT. NEWMAN 1 1 -0-
12. BOOMER 6 1 5 1007.
13. HAUNSPERGER 3 3 -0-
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
TOTALS 89 27 1 61 96.4%
ENFORCEMENT INDEX 8.8
J
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
INVESTIGATION DIVISION Month JULY 19 76
Number Cases Total Number Of
L '�sification Number Cases Number Cases Assigned Cases Cleared Arrests Per Case
i
Received Suspended
J / PART I / Patrol Invest, Patrol Invest, Adult Juv,
Homicide
Rape —
Robber
Awa$. Assault
Theft Under $50 23 14 4 1 5 3
Theft Over $50 14 9 1 4
2 — 1
Auto Theft 5 1 3 3 4
Burglary 6 2 5 1 1
PART I TOTALS 48 26 5 13 7 4 9
/ PART II /
Assault & Related 10 1 7 1 2 1 1
Check Offenses 3 3 3
Forgery & Related 2 2 1 1 1 1
Weapons Crimes —
Sex Offenses 1 1 1
Narcotic Offenses
Prostitution
Liquor_Offenses --
Gambling Offenses
Stol,n Property
Crimes 1 1
Vandalism 11 7 4 2 3
Other Part II
Crimes 8 1 3 1 6 1 1
PART II TOTALS 36 10 14 9 11 5 3 5
P RT I & II TOTALS 84 36 19 22 1 18 9 3 14
Total Cases Cleared 27 Total Office Hours 23.3 Total Training Hours 6
Total Cases Pending Patrol 19 Total Field Hours 100 _Total Court Hours 4
Total Cases Pending Investigation 22 Total Overtime Hours22 Total Other Hours 0
Total Warrants Issued 1
Total Misdemeanor Arrests 9
Total Cases Presented for Warrant Issuance 13
Total. Court Case Heard & Dispositions 0
L. Branstetter, Det. Sgt.
Investigation Division Commander
page twelve
r POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
SERVICES DIVISION
DUTIES TIME ALLOTTED
Dispatch Duties 251.1
Cards Typed/Filed ___ 74.0
Letters Typed ___ 12.5 Y_
Reports Typed 9.5
Special Details 178.4
Aid Other Agency/Person 74.4
Teletype Operation 63.7
Handwritten Reports 3.9
Authorized Breaks 40.5
TOTAL HOURS 708.0
page ten
MEMO
TO: City Council
DATE: August 16, 1976
FROM: Building Department
SUBJECT: Monthly Report
July's building activity included permits for 10 sign, 28
single family, 5 residential alter and repair, 9 apartments,
1 commercial, 13 commercial alter and repair, 6 miscellaneous
for a total valuation of $ 2,804,352.00.
Fees for 62 permits "� 10,475.48
Fees for 10 signs 205.00
Plumbing Activity - 31 973.70
Mechanical Activity - 19 144.00
Business Licenses 20 300.00
, 98.
Sealer Permits - 30 52,992.87
Sealer Inspections - 45 1,275.00
King City Activity:
4 residential alter and repair, 1 commercial alter and repair
for a total; valuation of$20,025.00.
a
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Co000oao000o00000o00000000000000000000000000
0
o •t; 0tD O�OOa70000tn0000000.-IOOOOMMMMMOtTCD OOOO� O�f` d �TU700.
+) 1- L- NNN NCOOOOOC- OOOOLoN 000Ln OO L- c- r- t-- 000 m OO00% O% N r- r- -100
10 MMMMMr-IN0000 OhO ("INMN0N0n0C- .- -4 -1 -4 MMt- Ln C3
3 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w •`
.-1 Lr) LntnLnM MrIMMM0 NN.-
M 1M-1Ow Nw tD CTD� CnCTw L!) Ndw d Ct N Lo Ln to "�
CO CC) C0 CO CO CO N CM d M CO N M M M tO M Ln Ln Ln LO M M N CV N N N N N M d
M
Z
O
F-
rr
J
0 0 0 M fr a
•ts a •13 -d od -zl
¢ -5 Lal ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢
¢ O
CD m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m w m m m m m m m m m m m c0 m m Cl) m m m m
U U U u U U U u U •r1 u U u U u u•rL •r1 u U u u u u u u u u . . •r1 u u u u U u u
C C C C C C C C C U C C C C C C U U C C C C C C C C C C U C C C C C C C
m m m m m m m m m H m m m m m m H H m m m m m m m m m m c4 m m m m m m m
13M0 � 0 -0 p my � O "o 'D m mvv -0 •DOa -0v '0 '0 m � T310 .00 � D
m •r1 •r1•r1 •r1••1 •r1••i •.1•.i E •r1 C •r1•r1 C C -4-4 •.i E E •i •.f C -1 •.i•r1 -4 •r1 ••i •.L •rl C E C •rl •.i-4 -H •rl C •ri ••1
CC) Cn co a) m fn N co Lo E U) Cn m N CT OL M N N E E N Cn O m CA co N N N N m QL E CT W N m LU V) LT N M
m m m m m m m m m O m •.i m m •.i •.i m m m O O m m •r1 m m m m m m m m •.i O •r1 m m m m Cl) •.1 m m
F-' H H H H H H H H H U H fA H H N N H H H U U H H N H H H H H H t4 H m U CC) H H t+ H H H H H
to H H H H H •
� tD 00000 • N • •
CL a
r- fl 10 a H m .1 4) . • a H -1 a O O
O O 'O O O O 00 C •ri U m •T3 O O • m m O Z7 • 0 0
L.J O 00 00 CO N 1) • 7 >.O O 41 C O 13 10 •O 'O r-1 _0 >.J J
C3. 3 3 3 3 3 'D J H •0 u •V ¢ 3• J'0 U M .-1 J r-L r4 r-1 r♦ .-4 -4.-i m.-i 3
>' 01 O C31 p1 OL O 1- O N = O O J r-f m m m m m m m -4 m = •0 13
C7 J C C C C C O 3 O •O O H •L) 0 13 fO 'O •.i •.4-H •.i •r1 •r1•.1 C.- •.i 0 0
Z O •.i-H •.i •r1•r1 3 m m 3 C C C u 3 0 3 0-C = O Ca. G.. k- w H G... Ca.. (. H (_ 0 0 0
H n H H H H H cn-4 U r-i c0 r-1 N •.i L O 0L O H O 4..) 4-) 4) 4J H H H H m H H H m H •.1 3 3
o mamma [ > m .•I r.f prw C 3 C 3 M -b 3L 3 3 3 3 m m m m -Y m m m E mwr•, r-1
-) Cn Cn cn N cn•.I H H O •0 L C U •.i m C •r1 C E C 41 'O C C C C E E E E C •0 •r1 E E E E E ••i m m
r� H•.•I H L C CT;.{ C 3 U m O H a) 'D • O CO C .-1 -4 r•1 .•1 E E E E •r1 C N E E E 3 E U N N
O 3 3 3 3 3 a c0 m U N•ri c0 •r•I N M H H 0. -i C >. H N N M W f0 N 3 3 3 3 CO N C 3 D D cn 3 CO Co N
m fl) MMMMCnL► 1 cnt` _ .i aL3 "LnU CO 3 ".-1Lam• 3333MMMMar- 3CnMM Ln OL
= co
MMMMM33333333�+ 33333J %DMr- -.0 nDDD
fA LON01dNCr)McncncnNfncndMMMMCn3 ULnOCf) CnU)CncnddtDtDCnu73%DdOMtDNLnLn
En-4 Mt')C) M cnMMM 4L-M
m CV O O to O O O Lo Ln O O tD O O Ln Lf)N Lo O k-r-I Ln O Ln Lo Lo Lo _ #+;O d =#_O Cn Cn
H dtDCoCVOOto(3% %DOInt) CnCO %DN0*41 %00 • 4M00Mt- %O M CDN.-i r- C1 O
M M,CTMOOOtDtDa) NCO d MNC• OdtD LnO 0MtDL1) MMMM4.) 414.) 4-1Md04J4•) 4.) +) •4) CM to tD
•O O O O . 4.-C r•I r-1.-1 r4 d Ln N r-i.4 M r•i.-i -4 .•-1 M c0 •-•1 N U3 N N N N 10 O O O N tD 00 O O O O M -4 -4
.-i•-? r♦r 1.i r-1 r-1•4 r I r♦ r4 •-1.-i •--I r4.4•-1 r4 N m r-f.-1 ri r-f .-C r-1 r-I J J J J r-1.-1 Ot J J J J J r-1 r♦ r-1
• • • • . • p . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 U U m u u u u u u u u u
U u U U U u .43 p (0 41 41 .4.3 1.) r-1.c.).1s.1.) .a, .L.)
N Cn fn M O O C a) • H C C C C C m C [ C C C
m m m m m m fn m ¢ u p m m m m 01 a m m m m m
[ C C C C C m E >. C 4.) E E E E ••i 3 E E E E E
3 3 3 3 > 3 E -0 L3.c0 m C ►+ cn mamafA Ln mamma
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C m 0 3.4) O 1-1 N C C C C O O O O m 00000
H m •r-1 r-1 CO 4)•.I • • .m Ln H •CS••i ••1•rf -4-4 .-i-4•A O r♦r♦ri.--1 r•1• 4
.-I•-i.-i .-♦r-I.-i 4J•.•1 O M m r-I m dJ O C O O m m m 4-) -6.3 43 41 m m m m 4)r-1 m m m m m
MMMMMOMMU >r-I r-I m H O U U 4.) H OL cm H H H H > > > > H to•.i > > > > >
[ C C C C C 01.--I CPO CO H U COL u) O '0 § c0 c0 c0 d8 m m m m•.i 3 Z m m m m m
H O O O O O O H UJ -8 COU c0 3 .0 CO -a dJ 41 O E: Z>_Z0000 CO H 00000 1
C) •rf•.-1-1•r1•r1-1 m O a 10 _0 E L E Cn L O O = =41 m H L t
.1.) +)-P iJ 4-3 dJ 43 m •C N J C . W O {) N N c0 •N E: •t1 d1-a df [ C C C C +) C C C C C m -P -P
u c0 Co COf0 CO 4-) -4 O • O.-1•ri+) -P L >.-I W -`s-4••i••-1-4N CO CO- 1•r1-4 •.•1•r1 L •r1 •.i
to C C C C C C ••-I 3 H•.3 U C m E 3 3 0 cO E••i [ H H H H+) +) -P+)- m+)41 d-)43 .0+) m E E
H H H H H H H O m J m m p O 0 CO cn J J.^I 3 Cn U O m m m m m c0 c0 m >. Cn CO c0 c0 CO c0 3 Cn u)
.41 m m m m m m 3 L r-I m t O)m t L m C 4-)Y 1-C .It r-I r-I 14-4 H • 1 .-I-4 ri 'A.-I
C +)+)-P •0 41 43 H C+) H co E rn m E u C) 4) 1� i)o a M r4 r•I r-f r-I� t0 m m c0 H cn-4 CC m a) LS) co L L L
olC C C C C C m 03 H m 3 m 3 H CO ••i O •H H c0 m O H 3 c0 CO c0 3 3 3 3 m • H 7 3 3 7 3 0 0 0
Hr-,►-,4,►-,►-,M M cX 0 1-M=0 n E M CC < M M ML- --33331- F-t-►-no1-1-1-1- f-1-mm m'
x
ool�0000000000000000000000a00000 000000
co0CEI 0000000000000000000000000000 000000
0 • • H • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•r1 0o X00 M O o0 04 o tf) o0 000 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 N o 0: 0 1D o O
41 OOCEI 00010o0CC) •CtOMmo0o0 MMLnLn000000Lf) 0 Ln N0001, 0 N
CU o0MU)Ln NOLr)OCC)r-INNLDt')NOO tnLn .-1 000 -1N0r- m M mr-4ON •-IO O
3 -
w�(. w w w w w w w w w w w
r-I M� L� Lr U) L,;m C Ln C- CO Q.-i rlc r O Ln r-1 Lf) r-1 1D cY r 1 .-1 1C: O
m 1-1 oa N N N S CM N N r-1 .-1-1 r-I M M M co :N
� m
N Ito
tai
Z
Z O
0 1y
H H
► � J O cr-
-i
J O O O
O O z O O O O O O CC O Li >-
Lr d! 1:O W O d1 (t -t3 od -8 -d .6 -t) -t) y m OCC m - J
-2f< W -a 0 -a aC d) ¢ Q cS Q cC S ¢ J J -t1 -t1 -tf di ¢ J 0
cc O¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ o cr cr ¢ a Cr r)
r-I r•i r-I r-I -4.--I -4 r-I r-i.--I .-1 F- r) r•1 ►-
mmmsa) La (Da) mmmmma) a) a) mm mm ma) maDmmmm0 Iva) a) c) m o
U•.i Al U U U U •r1•r1 U U U U U U •r1 U •.•1•r1 •r1 U U U -r1-.4•rl -r1 N U U U U •.i ►-
c U s c c c c U U c c c c c c U c U U U c c c U U U U c c c c u
m H m a) a) N (1) H H m a) m a) (1) (1) H a) H H N 0 a) m H H H H w a) 0 m H
0 m a) wvv -om N m 'DMoMMo a) •0 a) a) a) 'O0 ,0 0 m m 0 -0 •0 '0 'D a)
a) QI' ••-I E ->-(-R-A •�I•.-1 E E •.I•.4 •.-1•.4 •.•1•.-1 C E••4 E E C C E •.-I••-I ••-1 E E E E •r1 •.1 ••-I ••4 E
3 L>1JJI m E YA W m m m E E m m m m to 0 01E 0 E E 01rn E m m m E E E E m N m m E
C o) O aax Ln a) a) D) O O a) a) N a) a) (1) •r4 O a) O o -r1-H O a) a) a) O O O O a) a) a (D O
rc 1- H U M H H 14 H U U H IH H H H H C) U H U U N 0 U H H H U 0 0 0 H H H H U
C
O
U
1
cn a) 0 a) a) N H M
►-+ mmmmm o Z41--
E:1D H H R H (4 N 4 U Q 4-3 m m
O C` H H H H H .-I a) (1) •r1 m •r1
W LT • • a) a) ID N a) • • • • •r1 • •4J • 13 H •r1 14
CL.-1 -Y >1 1-1- 1-1- 1- >.+> >. >. m O) cn-H 0 a) O c. O
m 0C6
3 3U 3 L 3 HvM 30 Na-) 04-) In
U>- O > S 4-ca.. 0- ti.- L4. S S d- 2 1-1-1.--1 Lr) 1-1 ••-1 U 4J U a)
Z _J O ¢ m m m m m •o CO a) m m m r-1 •.4 U •r1 E
►-+0 >%•o c U m m N a) 0 U C U m m U > a) W ••i m
0 rl) Q c m y-H r-1 r-1-4 r-1 .--1 •r1 m -rl N •r1 Q U C C C C � r7
J D N L .-1 H " c•C C C C 4--r♦ W m 3 u- m o 0 0 0 C c C C
►-+ 4J r X= dJ L m -r1 C m m a) 0 m L 10-4 .0 •.i r-1 C Ln •r1 -0 H 4.3 4.)-P 41 N m LD a) 0
0 C aM•-3 d LT LT U-4 CD a) m a) a)•N C U LT U a •r1 U N H H a a a a a) 0 a) N c
m a) 3 CR U)CJ •r1•r1 m m 14 H H H (4 13 N m-.•I m m LT m m t) m E E E E 3 7 3 3 •.•1
u cnCKCA 4 = I-- CL E: Lo U U UUtl- L- aSa •vE:cra Cm m m m m o'cy =Cyr z
X H M 0-4 = Sx =
co can cm CN 29 Cf)cncuL3c3nccnnccnnc3nc3nCnnc3nCoulc3U) v3) rnU.)- U) 3ccnnc3n333 3 rnCnnL3r) U) c�n
N X •.i I U) Ln N cn Ln
a) U) •L>3 O U) Ln O O O L)Ln L)Ln Ln O O ri in 0 1-m -1 Ln o U) Ln Lr) Ln O O
H .-I 01910 C) MMOLTLn10L- CDOhN01MmN LT ID L- U) MO10000 Lr)LTO1-4m
M rj1 D.2C -1N r-1O0N Mt) MMt')MCmN •cl1Dr•IdmNQ Lr) OLr)00 m %D %D Om
13 O ri Y r-1 N O o N N o O o O O n 10 r•1 M r-1 O N.-1 r l%Y •Cf• 4.--1 r-1 r-1.••1 .-I U) Ln 10 .-1
cr r•1 m Y.-1 ri r-1.-1 r-1 r♦ r-1 r♦r•I .-•1 r- ri r-1.-I r•I. l r•1 .-•1 r4 .-1 m r-I r-1 C- Com•N r� .•-1.-1 r-1 -1 .-4
C
a)
^ E
C +�
a) • N
• • • • • • (32 O m . •
O O O O O O ! 1 U > O O
U UUUUU )to O) c U
MI C H
In C C C C C C E a) C -rl -d W • C
CD m 0 w 0 0 0 o _0) a -P o +� c0 cn m
-1 E E E E E E ;' = ` O •r1 •.i U L H H F- E
CU a aaaaaC -C. 94M H E +3 D U a a
L - O O o O o o ca '=- r f OL m M ID •rl U H H m E: O
CD -M-r1 .-1 .-1 r•1 ra.-•1 -4 m 0 3 4.J 4J .-1 m D 4J m 0 0 a) O r-I
1-14-3 44•t•) a) LD m LD m a)J H=4- O C C a) H co LD+) C H W Q)
4J. 0 S O > >. > > > > > U m o m•H a) O 04-) C to m O CO a >
4JDSCC ® -064 mCDmLDCD . CE: LMH a Hmom+) aa- a) 0)
H •.-1 H X H m 0 H LD 0 0 0 0 0 D:.j ti-- O m H E C C U'Lr M LD r♦ L 13 O
O J+3 CC C! G a) a • La- • m•M m O a) O r-1 a) 1- 4.3 m
4.3 = Y. C C dJ O C C C c C tr C:fr�iC to U O Ll U o ?.C a) 3 �-+ •r1 U- U C
U 0) aJ x • Lc •ri LL) 0 •rl•.i-H•.i•r1 CI 0 -•1 `C L O 0) -P m I- U 13 E L- •rl �
Co a)CO QK U Y•a3 LD U L2+-3+)++ +) .J'0 J✓' -P 3 m LD c a) • 3 H U U m cn O Lr)•-)
H .-1 X co 7 o m m m to ca ri LaiLa)fa Li•V r) o O LTO m ()•r1 •-1 U a) S m m
4.) H +'=13 •ri ,L L .-i r4 r•1 r4.-i (0 L.J C LD -P •0 a) H •Cs a H J-4 Z m • E.-t
C O cn H 13 U m E U m co m m CO m C G3 J L E O LD H.-I 0 3 0 a) -d L 0 Do
O L • X m • D O•rc•.•i D D D D D O L-t 0 0 •r1-U o 0 (0 a) •13 H E - 3 Y • • O L D
U U>>[J7F-F-0mI-F-1-1-1-0et:>-!W )tor7L3 (nLCID 0Wa¢m (1 r) mr)1-F-
- C
MEMORANDUM
t
k TO: Council
FROM: Finance Director .
t DATE: August 19, 1976
SUBJECT: Financial Report
The Finance Department will not supply Council with a financial report
n at this time.
After the fiscal year 1975-76 books were closed many hours have been
devoted to preparing the work schedules as requested by the auditor. In
order to limit the city's audit costs, staff has prepared numerous work
sheets for audit perusal and verification.
In addition considerable time has been spent on removing the fixed asset
audit exception from the city's audit report. Staff has had to determine the
value of land at the time it was dedicated to the city through various means
such as sub-division plats, greenway dedications, requirement by Planning
Commission, etc. Also, construction costs of sewer lines that were not built
by the City. These lines may have been acquired through annexation or in-
stalled by the developer or builder. In addition we have developed costs for
sewer lines built prior to incorporation of the city by the Sanitary Districts.
This is a one-time effort that is well worth the time spent to have all
the city's records verified and current. Henceforth it will be a matter of
keeping our records current. We anticipate the information is satisfactory
and the audit exception will be removed from future reports.
Coopers & Lybrand staff has been in the office for the past 2 weeks and
require city staff assistance to accomplish the audit. They hope to be out
of the office by next week.
The City's State Tax Street Fund was audited by the State in the past
few weeks. This is a routine matter and it was not too disruptive of city
routine.
Lastly, with the delay in adoption of the 1976-77 budget until August
9, 1976, we have been unable to do the necessary paper work to prepare for
the coming year. Work in this area is coming along and we will have our
records ready for posting within the next week.
The standard monthly report format, including July and August will be
continued next month.
/( .C�
7 c.
TIGARD LIBRARY REPORT FOR JULY 1976
July was one of the most exciting months for us. The completed
non-fiction was was formally dedicated with the Mayor and the J C
Vice-President cutting the ribbon. Jenny Lindner provided back-
ground music; the Friends of the Library supplied the coffee,punch
and cookies; the antique airplane club had an excellent display;
and the Tigard Art Club hung quite a few of their paintings which
will remain in the library for an ever-lasting revolving display.
The antique display case was re-glassed intime for the opening and
Celeste Boennighausen filled it with a bicentennial exhibit.
During July we also checked out the greatest number of books,
cassettes and magazines that we have ever done. The total was 6,719.
Total fines for the month= $81.05.
Also during this month we issued approximately 166 new cards.
Of this, 86 were to Tigard residents and 80 were to County. Again
this is running parallel to June's total. Very few cards have been
issued to our of county residents so far. If we were to experience
a great surge, we do recommend that an out-of-county fee be imposed.
We will keep you informed as to the county's thoughts.
We now have a worker 3 days a week through the Clackamas County
Manpower program. His name is Steve Putnam and he serves as a sort
of a specialist doing the scrapbooks, rearranging shelves, filing
and clipping for our vertical fig
f"
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
for the period from July 26 to August 23
Zone Changes 4
Conditional Uses 3
Temporary Uses 0
Variances 1
Minor Land Partitions 2
Preliminary Plats 0
Subdivision Variances 0
Site Design & Architectural Review 9
Miscellaneous 0
Ordinance Revisions 0
Sign Code Appeals 2
Comprehensive Plan Revisions 0
Non-Conforming Use 1
The LCDC planning program is on schedule according to the
approved work program. Presently they are gathering base
data such as land use, soils, physical hazards, etc. This
essential planning information will provide the data base
for planning policy decisions which are programmed to begin
this fall.
The Neighborhood Plan Organizations took the month of August
off and the next meetings are the first week in September.
F,�iz �3 'iG76
CITY OF TIGARD
National Safety Company
7530 S.F. Poster Rd.
Portland, Oregon 97206
August 12, 1976
City Council
City of Tigard
12420 S.W. Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Gentlemen:
We plan to construct a warehouse on Bonita Rd. - M-3 zone -
Your code requires a 20' landscape strip between the street and
the property line.
We have plotted the building as far south as the terrain and use
utility will allow.
Your instructions (no specific code covers this area) to the plan-
ning department states that when a building permit is taken out,
you will ask the property owner to donate to the city 10' of his
property frontage for future road expansion. Remember this 10' is
not purchased but donated free to the city.
We have been asked by your planning department to file a variance
and pay a fee of $125.00 so the future 10' road donation comes out
of the 20' landscape strip.
We are receiving no benefit from this variance request. Therefore
we respectfully ask the council to waive the $125.00 fee.
Sincerely,
John R. Skourtes
President
JRSsjl
Mw¢
CHAIRMAN:
MAN:
BLAINE WHIFFLE COMMITTEES
6453 RW OROORRIDO¢
014
PORTLAND.OREGON 97225 ..- LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND
ELECTIONS
ER:
MEMB
.e WASHINGTON COUNTY (, ...C.,=f REVENUE
V TRANSPORTATION
OREGON STATE SENATE !
SALEM. OREGON
97310
August 9, 1976
Mayor Wilbur Bishop
City of Tigard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mayor Bishop:
I am a member of the Interim Committee on Intergovernmental
Affairs.
i
On July 22, with my affirmative vote, the committee voted to
recommend to the 1977 Legislature that it enact a revenue sharing
program for Oregon cities.
The recommendation is for four percent of the state revenues with
a maximum not to exceed $25,000,000 per year. A specific formula
was also recommended which will be subject to intense debate. You
may want to have your financial people begin to study the various
formulas proposed so you will be prepared to make a recommendation
on one.
The proposal is limited to one biennium. The committee felt the
Legislature would want to see the program in action before grant-
ing any permanence to the program.
Please share this information with your council members.
Sincerely,
Blaine k1hipple
State Senator
BW/slm
ROBERT W. STRAUB `'�
GOVERNOR
cl`.
Gq�,v
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
STATE CAPITOL
SALEM. OREGON 97310
August 13, 1976
Bruce P. Clark
City Administrator
City of Tigard
Post Office Box 23557
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mr. Clark:
This is to acknowledge the resolution from the
Tigard City Council in support of a program for sharing
state income tax revenues with cities.
I appreciate having this expression of opinion
from your city and will give it careful consideration.
I have not yet decided what recommendations to
make to the next session of the Legislature, but I assure
you that the views you have expressed will be carefully
considered.
Sincerely,
1r� ,
Governor
RWS:js
�r
- OYU
f/v r OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
i -i� •.�� I .' �� / / OREGON STATE SENATE
LEM,OREGON 97310
(503) 378.8173
JASON D. t]OE �i�`
President
August 10, 1976
Dear fellow elected official:
I am writing to request your assistance in preparing legislation
for the 1977 session of the Oregon Legislature.
Enclosed are the results of the land use survey which you partici•-
: pated in earlier this year. I had originally intended to mail
copies only to those officials who had signed their questionnaire.
I have now decided, however, that the results should be shared with
all local officials. Consequently, I am asking that you make this
copy available to all members of your council or commission.
The survey results make one thing clear: although the majority of
local officials do not support SB 100 in its present .form, most
officials would prefer to see the law amended instead of repealed.
I do not intend to ignore these feelings.
I am willing to see those amendments favored by local governments
drafted into bill form for introduction to the 1977 Legislature.
If your council or commission is willing to take part in this process,
I ask that the entire body discuss and adopt formal proposals for
amendment either at a regular or special meeting. As you know, SB
100 has been codified as ORS 197.005 to 197.430, and also amends
ORS 215,055, 215.510, 215.515 and 215.535.
This is your opportunity to participate directly in the legislative
process. I need your proposals as soon as possible to insure they
are ready for introduction when the 1977 Legislature convenes. I
would prefer to receive them before November 1st, if at all possible.
If you have any questions, contact my assistant, Dave Dierdorff,
at 378-8173.
Thank you for your willingness to become involved.
V y truly yours,
Jas D Boe
Pr silent
ego State Senate
enc.
_ n w p�, t s• �- -� trL ) y � h�,i� F.Tr`W r�h,t`.'.�-S 5{4��f'Y&Y¢y�,a�f�� ..a t , .
����,' 1 {^,J�1►��/�,ti•.•�+�, A 'ro,�yY�)�.,,.r_- j r P..-t ���yy r^D_j., 1. °.� rf>�.a.r.f%!"jto��"Ky�ri
' �� �Irfd'... N � B, r a'": - ' .y� Y .:F + ?i?: a t �t � :;�9 c. .i s itK'„��5,•'�ri.�
OFFI'CEF T :SENATE PIESIDENs� E 1.
Y �l 1 rte_ Y � l� _:;Q I'' �' 9 7 r �i' .J y" ^'^ Y tihy^� �q,`-✓'�1•�{"qC,�F•.*"�'Yrf
Yt,
b.
r
Jn,
r s.
i
F
9 ..
v
t,
u
l_
r
1
LAND USE SURVEY: RESULTS
On May 12, 13 and 14th, Senate President Jason Boe mailed
land use surveys to 1, 322 mayors, city councilmen, county
commissioners and port commissioners around the state. Com-
pleted responses were returned by 468 officials, or 35% of the
target population. These returns break down as follows:
TOTAL RESPONSES: 468
A
{
OFFICE HELD: Mayor 22%
City Council 54%
County Commission 13%
Port Commission 10%
i
REGION REPRESENTED: Central & Eastern 28%
Southern 12%
Coast 25%
Willamette Valley
& Portland 35%
POPULATION REPRESENTED: Less than 1,000 21%
1,000 to 2,499 22%
2,500 to 9,999 27%
10,000 to 24,999 15%
25,000 to 74 ,999 9%
Over 75,000 6%
No Answer 1%
The results to questions 4 through 15 will be given by totals,
(� offices held and region represented. All results are given as a
percentage of respondents.
LAND USE SURVEY Page two
QUESTION 4: HOW DESIRABLE DO YOU BELIEVE LAND USE PLANNING TO BE?
Very Of little Very
Desirable Desirable Importance Undesirable Undesirable
TOTAL 36% 50% 5% 3% 3%
The responses to this question indicate that the overwhelming
majority of elected local officials (86%) believe that land use
planning is desirable. This is a very significant point to remember
when reviewing the remaining questions.
QUESTION 5: HOW WOULD YOU RATE YOUR JURISDICTION'S PLANNING
EFFORTS?
Excellent Pretty Good Only Fair Poor No Answer
TOTAL 40% 43% 13% 2% 1%
The results of this question indicate that the vast majority
of elected local officials (83%) believe their jurisdictions have
good or excellent land use planning efforts.
1
LAND USE SURVEY Page three
QUESTION 6: WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING DO YOU FEEL HAS CONTRIBUTED
THE MOST TO THE PROBLEMS OF LAND USE PLANNING IN
OREGON TODAY? (Percentages total more than 100%
because some respondents named more than one. )
N N
4J 4J
N
a) -A 9:
i� rl b .-1 -ri
c0 31 U a) m 4J 't3
to $4 o � aoi w 4j
mi o Q w mi o o 54
aa
W a) r4 4j N W
U ro b H > U Q 4
H H a° a w ao
TOTAL 27% 5% 12% 23% 12% 15% 18% 6%
The results of this question indicate that local elected
officials blame state government more than any other cause for
a the current land use planning problems. 27% of the officials
picked the Legislature, and 24% picked State Agencies. Lack of
Public Understanding (18%) and Environmentalists (15%) drew
the next highest number of responses.
T�
t
LAND USE SURVEY Page .four
QUESTION 7: IN YOUR OPINION, WHICH LEVEL (S) OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD
HAVE WHAT DEGREE OF INVOLVEMENT IN LAND USE PLANNING?
(Percentages total more than 100 because most
respondents marked more than one answer. )
i
y > aci •u> � aci
��ll N •N a) �•N � � a)
D \ O \ \ > O r. O O
\N \ \ N Z tT r. 9
tP > Z w v w tT w 9
o �4a _� a� a o �4 O c o a �
fwd N b H � . .r �H aJ1 04 rZ ate► r. 4 H
Vl U fI) N (J1 'Z PG U IYi N CG 7•+ U U U N U Z
TOTAL 26% 5% 45% 26% 8% 35% 78% 84% 2%
The results clearly show that most local elected officials
believe land use planning should be the responsibility of County
and City Governments (78%) . A large percent, although not a
majority, believe state and regional governments should not be
involved in either comprehensive planning or zoning activities.
The opposition to regional governments is less than the opposition
to state governments, however.
i
.i
LAND USE SURVEY Page five
QUESTION 8: DO YOU SUPPORT SB 100 (1973 SESSION) IN ITS PRESENT
FORM?
No No
Yes No Opinion Answer
TOTAL 17% 778 6% 1%
QUESTION 9: IF YOUR ANSWER TO QUESTION 8 WAS NO, SHOULD SB 100
BE REPEALED OR AMENDED? (Results given as percentage
of respondents answering No on Question 8. )
Repealed Amended
TOTAL 42% 58%
Questions 8 and 9 were designed to be read together. They
show that while the vast majority of elected local officials
do not support SB 100 in its present form (77%) , most officials
would prefer to see it amended instead of repealed.
s
QUESTION 10: IF SB 100 IS TO BE AMENDED, WOULD YOU FAVOR:
4J -P 4J r4 4J r-1 r4 -P rq dJ r•1 r-1
0 Id a) 0 0 O to 0 to b b rd Cu a) 0
4J r-1 4J r-1 43 r-4 41 U 4J U V U 4-3.,.{ .0•r1 4J•,I
to 0 W o (d O U)•r1 U)•r1 t0.,.1 W U U] U (0 U
P W 4J $4 O 1~ V G 1~ 0 4J O
() V N 4J Ul 4-) a) 4 N.0 to 4 a) rt N ro U) (0
$4 0 to R 9 1.1 U m U U W O N 0 0
O O (V O 00 O a) 0.4) 0 0) 0-4 a)•-1 O.,.1
U aU ZU ZEE+ 0E4 ZEA Zr4 0r1 zW
TOTAL 3% 54% 26% 37% 24% 21% 50% 13% 18%
3
F
LAND USE SURVEY Page six
As the results indicate, elected local officials favor
amendments that provide for Less State Control, More State
Technical Aid, and More State Financial Aid. Significantly,
more officials favor a reduction in state control than favor
the complete elimination of state control.
QUESTION 11: IN YOUR OPINION, WOULD SB 100 BE REPEALED IF
IT IS REFERRED TO A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE?
No No
Yes No Opinion Answer
TOTAL 69% 19% 8% 4%
The results of this question are worth comparing to the
results of questions 8 and 9. When read together, they show
that, while the majority of elected local. officials either support SB
100 in its original form or favor amendment, most (69%) believe
SB 100 will be repealed if referred to the voters.
QUESTION 12: DO YOU FEEL THE PRESENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE LAND
CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (LCDC)
IS SUFFICIENTLY REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL OREGONIANS?
No
Yes No Answer
TOTAL 21% 73% 5%
i
LAND USE SURVEY Page seven
The results indicate that the majority of elected local
officials (73%) do not believe that LCDC is representative of
all Oregonians. The next question is an attempt to determine
which groups the officials feel are over-represented on LCDC.
QUESTION 13: IF YOUR ANSWER TO QUESTION 12 WAS NO, DO YOU
BELIEVE THE MEMBERS OF LCDC ARE SLANTED TO ONE
OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING GROUPS (results given
as percentage of those answering No on Question
12) :
U] N
dJ 4J
•.i U1 N
r.
r.
r0 $4 iJ r. A O
N $4 '-1 W to A a U
•rl O O .1 r_4 (D •� 4JRi 4)
M tp ami 4J O -P
ra ►-� ,a Q a ►-► w w a o
TOTAL 8% 7% 8% 138 72% 58% 5% 12%
Those officials that feel LCDC is not adequately represen-
tative believe that it is slanted toward Environmentalists (72%)
and State Agencies (58%) . Real Estate Interests run a distant
third (13%) .
r
LAND USE SURVEY Page eight
QUESTION 14: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE YOUR WORKING RELATION-
SHIP WITH THE STAFF OF THE LAND CONSERVATION AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION?
Open & Hostile & No
Cooperative So-So Suspicious Contact Answer
TOTAL 27% 330 15% 12%
13%
The largest block of elected local officials rated their
relationship with LCDC as So-So (33%) . The next highest group
chose Open and Cooperative (27%) .
t
QUESTION 15: HAS THE LCDC OR ITS STAFF BEEN HELPFUL TO YOU IN
DEALING WITH THE PROBLEMS OF YOUR CONSTITUTENCE?
No No
Yes No Opinion Answer
TOTAL 28% 39% 19% 13%
The largest group of local elected of-ficials felt that LCDC
was not helpful in dealing with the problems of their constituence
(39%) . This is not surprising, given the fact that 48% of the
officials rated their working relationship with LCDC as either
So-So or Hostile and Suspicious in the previous question.
LAND USE SURVEY Page nine
CONCLUSIONS
Although caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions
from a survey such as this, a number of points seem obvious:
1. The vast majority of elected local officials believe
land use planning is desirable and feel their local
jurisdictions are doing an Excellent or Good job
in their planning efforts (83%) .
2. Although the majority of local elected officials do
not support SB 100 in its present form (77%) , they
would prefer to see it amended, instead of repealed.
3. Local elected officials are not pleased with the state's
involvement in land use planning. Half of the officials
blame the Legislature and State Agencies for the current
problems in land use planning, and 45% believe the
State should not be involved in such activities. And of
those officials who would prefer to see SB 100 amended,
80% favor less or no state control.
4. Local officials are not only displeased with SB 100,
but with the make-up of the Land Conservation and
Development Commission itself. 73% of the officials
believe LCDC does not adequately represent all Oregonians.
Of those officials, 72% believe the Commission is domin-
ated by Environmentalists and 58% believe it is slanted
toward State Agencies.
r
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
OF
® WASHINGTON COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING—150 N. FIRST AVENUE _
HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 CITY OF I IGARD
(503) 648-8621
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Joel Wesselman
General Manager
VIRGINIA DAGG.Chairman Room 302
RICHARD C.HEISLER
RAY MILLER
J.ALLAN PATERSON
MICHAEL SHEPHERD
August 17 , 1976
Mr. Bruce Clark, City Administrator
City of Tigard
P. O. Box 23997
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mr. Clark:
RE: Sewer Service Rate Increase
This letter is to notify you that a correction should be made
on the Public Hearing Schedule in our letter of August 16, 1976.
The September 21, 1976, Hearing hour for the Washington County Board
of Director's Public Hearing on Rate Increase--Scheduled Date for
Final Board Action was listed to begin at 7 :30 p.m. This was a
typographical error and should read 1:30 p.m.
Again, if we can be of further information, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
Joel Wesselman
✓.% General Manager
b
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
OF
CWASHINGTON COUNTY CITY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING—150 N. FIRST AVENUE
HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123
(503) 648.8621
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Joel Wesseiman
VIRGINIA DAGG.Chairman General Manager
RICHARD C.HEIS LER
August 16, 1976 Room 302
RAY MILLER
J.ALLAN PATERSON
MICHAEL SHEPHERD
Mr. Bruce Clark, City Administrator
City of Tigard
P. 0. Box 23997
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mr. Clark:
RE: Sewer Service Rate Increase
During the budget development process last spring you were in-
formally advised of this Agency' s intent to propose a rate increase
to be effective on October 1 , 1976. At that time, it was also in-
dicated that our 1976-77 budget was predicated upon an increase in
Agency rate from the existing $3 per month to $5 per month for single
family service.
Agency management will be recommending implementation of the
66 2/3%increase, in accordance with the following schedule:
ACTIVITY DATE
Notice to Public Regarding Board of September 1, 1976
Directors' Public Hearings on'
September 14 and 21, 1976
Effective date of Ordinance #3 September 7, 1976
Establishing Annual Billing Pro-
cedure
*Unified Sewerage Agency Commission September 8, 1976
Public Hearing on Rate Increase 7 :30 p.m.
*Washington County Board of Directors' September 14, 1976
Public Hearing on Rate Increase 7:30 p.m.
*rWashington County Board of Directors' September 21, 1976
Public Hearing on Rate Increase-- 7 :30 p.m.
Scheduled Date fpr Final Board
Action
-2-
. Proposed Effective Date of Rate October 1, 1976
'Public Hearings to be held in the Washington County Administration
Building, 150 North First Avenue, Hillsboro, Oregon, Hearing Room 402.
You will note that the above schedule shows an effective date
for the Agency' s new collection procedure on an annual billing con-
cept. As explanation, it should be made clear that our annual
method of collection will not have an effect upon contractual cus-
tomers such as yourself. Tfie Agency could provide an annual billing
service to contractual customers at any future date if you decided
to proceed in this manner in the future.
During the past fiscal year, the Unified Sewerage Agency com-
pleted a preliminary financial study utilizing the financial con-
sultant services of Price, Waterhouse & Co. The study was commis-
sioned primarily for adjustment of Agency rate regulations to comply
with the rate provisions of the Environmental Protection Agency in
the area of Industrial Cost Recovery.
On the basis of the 1976-77 expenditure proposals, together with
the preliminary rate development work completed during the last fiscal
year, the 1976-77 budet included recommendations for a sewer service
charge increase from t3 per month to $5 per month, effective October 1,
1976. Further, the budget proposal for Fiscal Year 1976-77 provides
for complete reanalysis and updating of the Agency financial plan
prepared in 1970. The new financial plan would provide for a five-
year rate projection for sewer charges, connection charges and ad valo-
rem taxes, together with associated projections for total revenues and
expenditures.
The proposed .rate increase is the first since the Unified Sewerage
Agency was created in 1970. The recommended rates are a result of
significant cost increases , most of which are due to the following
factors:
A. Operational Costs--Advanced Stage (Tertiary) Treatment.
The Agency Master Plan for capital improvements and financing
was based upon the construction of secondary treatment facilities with
the use of dilution water from the Scoggin project. The Department
of Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency
water quality requirements necessitated the construction of advanced
wastewater (tertiary) treatment facilities which resulted in capital
cost increases for the Rock Creek and Durham facilities from the $15.5
million 1970 estimate to the currently established cost of $46.9 mil-
lion. Fortunately, these extensive cost increases have been satisfied
by equivalent increases in the level of Federal assistance on these
projects.
Operational costs will have a direct relationship with initial
capital costs. Although capital costs resulting from increased plant
-3-
will not similarly offset. Due to earlier completion of Agency
capital improvements for wastewater treatment, the Agency is experi-
encing an early impact of Federal water quality law passed in 1972.
It is apparent that operations, nationwide, will soon be faced with
these cost implications when new facilities become operational.
B. Inflationary Rates in Excess of Those Projected in 1970.
The 1970 financial plan made inflation allowances totaling about
25 percent for the Phase I, ten-year capital improvement plan. Con-
struction cost indexes during only the first six years of the ten-year
plan show that such costs have increased some 70.9 percent since 1970.
The inflationary influences on projected operational costs are of
similar magnitude. The 1970 financial plan projections, in the areas
of operation, maintenance and administration, provided a minimal infla-
tionary factor of 2.997 percent, per annum, for the eight years from
1972 through 1980. The Agency operational expense projections within
the 1970 plan provided $1. 99 million for Agency operation in 1976-77 .
This is compared with the budget proposal for 1976-77 which programs
$6. 25 million for these activities .
C. Energy Costs.
Total operational costs have been extensively increased by both
the increased energy demands of advanced stage treatment and energy
cost increases which exceed the unprecedented inflation rates noted
above. These energy cost and utilization influences can be given
perspective relative to the 1970 financial plan by noting that the
$1. 04 million expenditure programmed for energy in the 1976-77 budget
totals over half of the expenses projected for the entire Agency
General Fund, as projected by the 1970 Bartle-Wells financial plana
Although the Agency is developing a longer-range financial pro-
ic factors alone result in the critical
gram, the above referenced econom
need for the rate increase proposed for Fiscal Year 1976-77. With the
increhse, the Agency is expected to utilize approximately $1.5 million
of working capital to sustain operations until June 30, 1977 . The
negative status of operating income relative to operating expenses
during the current fiscal year is the further basis for our continuing
analysis of our financial status during this period of rapid change in
Agency operations.
The Unified Sewerage Agency solicits your assistance in communi-
cating with your customers which are served by the Agency on an in-
direct basis. If we can be of assistance in preparing informational
notices or billing stuffers, please contact us.
Very trul yours,
. ` oel Wesselman
General Manager
wi JW:by
OREGON STATE
HIGHWAY DIVISION _
REGION 1 �Ur�
CITY ()F Tyr,
P.O. BOX 02157 • PORTLAND 97202 • Phone 60-9090
ROBERT W. STRAUB August 11, 1976
GOVERNOR
F.S.KLABOE
Administrator and
State Highway Engineer Tigard City Council
Tigard, OR 97223
At 7:30 p.m. on September 9 the Oregon State Highwa Division wi_l
hold a public hearing at the Whitford School, 7935 S.W. Schon-,
Ferry Road to discuss the proposed interchange at S.*,.;' Aaen
and Highway 217 in Beaverton. We would like to in,,ite t~e
officials who sere all the people affected by t—
attend this hearing. Your oral or k.erten testimony
valuable in reaching a decision on the proposed project and in
addition, testimony given by others may be useful to your a�enc•. :..
its future planning.
On Wednesday, September B, the day before the fcrral hear;= will
hold an information session from 4:0C until 9.00 p.m. to
people with the project and answer cues-tions. :his -:ill
the Whitford School and we hope ;,acs may be able to alto. = les::
meetings. If you have any quest_ ns a:ou: the prcjes. «e'..
to answer them if you'll call this
Very trulJ yours,
on o-ce
Region Federal Aid -Ercin=_er
r
Form 91_7U41:4
•
r.
�o•
J ..e.
�y V?
yf�
d�
d ,n
�.r v1
W
Zo L
- �r
Q'
LLJ
P{
Z
S� z
N
v c = }
W =
z co Z Q o�
Ci ZO
ti a Y 0 ~
Z Z Z
O 3jd o •N "'� w <t
F.- o cD Qm Q 3
OCcr
Zw
LLJ
Q ~ � � .J
W —i
�n�f77iy� Q
.*oto A277YA AFI.JV7071 y
�o
s
3�7r
r *M SALEM: Local Government Center
EUGENE: Hendricks Hall
1201 Court Street N.E. A U L t a i University of Oregon
, > a
P.O.Box 928,Salem 97308 P.O.Box 3177,Eugene 97403
Telephone:(503)588-6466 CITY 01; TiGARD Telephone: (503)686-5232
g
lea ue of Oregon Cities
.
Salem, Oregon
August 16, 1976
To: (1) Mayors and City Managers of Oregon Cities Over 10,000 Population
(2) Selected Other City Officials
This letter contains information about plans for the Oregon delegation to the 1976
Congress of Cities of the National League of Cities, November 28 to December 1, in
Denver. We would appreciate it if you would make this information available to any
members of your council or other officials of your city who may be planning to
attend.
We have made arrangements for a block of rooms to be reserved at the Denver Hilton
Hotel for Oregon delegates, in response to requests from a number of Oregon offi-
cials that the Oregon group be housed in the same hotel . Therefore, if any of the
delegates from your city wish to obtain rooms in this block, they should Indicate
on their hotel reservation forms that their first choice is the Denver Hilton Hotel
and type a notation on the form that the room is to be part of the Oregon block. It
will not be necessary for them to indicate 2nd, 3rd or 4th choices if they wish to
be in the Oregon block. Reservation requests for rooms in the Oregon block must be
_._�.
recgjved by Oc __ after that date, delegates will be assigned wherever space
s available.
Your attention is called to the new procedure established by National League of
Cities this year in which hotel reservation information is sent individually only to
those city officials who register in advance. Therefore, registration must be com-
pleted before the hotel reservation form is sent to delegates; you should allow the
necessmry processing time in planning to meet the October 1 deadline for the Oregon
block of rooms.
Advance registration information has been sent to a number of cities, but if you have
not received a packet or need additional copies, please contact the League office in
Salem.
With regard to travel, there are no discounts for group travel between Portland and
Denver. Coach fare is $192.00 round trip; economy round trip coach is $172.00.
We will appreciate being kept advised as to officials from your city who will be
attending the Congress of Cities so that we can more effectively coordinate arrange-
ments for the Oregon delegation.
Sincerely yours,
Executive Director
OFFICERS: Richard T. Carruthers, mayor, Hammond, DIRECTORS: Mayor John D. Brenneman, Newport • Mayor Miller Arthur
rR. Hillsboro . Mayor Elaine
president•Ellen C.Lowe,councilwoman,Salem,vice- Essolstyn,Cascade Locks • Mayor Lawrence P.Gray. Hermiston • Arthur R. Johnson, city manager, Bend
president • C. Dean Smith, city manager, Corvallis, Charles R.Jordan, commissioner of public safety, Portland Mayor Donnell Smith, The Dallas • Tom R.
treasurer • Donald L. Jones, executive director Williams,councilman, Eugene, Immediate past president • Floyd L. Wynne, councilman, Klamath Falls
�01
NOM[AODR[SSCOMMITTEES
PAT WHITING 1975 SESSION:
9122 9W 9►RUC[5TR[[T CO-CHAIRMAN:
TIGARD.OR[OON 97229 ENVIAONM[NTIEN[ROY
WASHINGTON COUNTY '•�'�r-�' EDUCATION/5CN00L.FINANCi
DISTRICT 7
WOuSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
r-� 'CtE' '+♦j E® SALEM. OREGON
97310
J
CITY OF TIGARO
August 15, 1976
Mr. Bruce Clark
City Administrator
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23557
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Bruce:
Thank you for your letter of August 11th informing me
of Council action adopting Resolution No. 76-63 regarding
revenue needs of the City of Tigard.
In behalf of the current fiscal problems Oregon cities
are experiencing and in view of Tigard's continuous endeav-
ors to meet the needs of our camunity as well as in reoog-
nition of our Tigard City Employees who have voluntarily
accepted no raise contracts at this time, I will be favorably
considering legislation in the 1977 Session regarding an
income tax revenue sharing program.
Again, thank you for keeping me informed on Council
action. Best personal regards.
Respectfully,
PAT WHITING
State Represen tive
House District 7
�H ,