The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 04/26/1976 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL a4' REGULAR MEETING ,.. APRIL 26, 1976, 7:30 P.M' FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LECTURE ROOM AGENDA: 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS 5. CONSENT AGENDA: (All mattersunder this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted •in one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired by any Council member or member of the audience, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.) (a) APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 12, 13, 1976 (b) RECEIVE AND FILE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (1) Bob Packwood re: Federal Revenue Sharing (2) I.es Aucoin re: Federal Revenue Sharing (3) Al Ulman re: Federal Revenue Sharing (4) Coos Bay re: L.C.D.C. (5) Public Utility Commissioner re: Hunziker Street Railroad Crossing (6) Casper Bruno re: Taxicab rates (7) H.U.D. re: H.C.D. Application (c) APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $21,5.61.75 (d) SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS: The following items are set for Public Hearing on May 10, 1976 commencing at 8:00 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School. (1) Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 2-76) A proposed amendment of the Tigard Zoning Code, amending Chapter 18.20 to include a new zoning classification for 3 dwelling units per acre (R-10). (2) Zoning Ordinance Amendement (ZOA 4-76) A proposed amendment of the Tigard Municipal Code, amending Chapter 18, Section 18.12:100--yard requirements setbacks--to make the additional centerline setback of 40 feet required for all of S.W. Walnut Street within the City the same as that required by Washington County (35 feet). (3) Zone Change (ZC 8-75) Request for approvalcf rezoning of lands within the boundaries of "NPO No. 3 Plan -for Derry Dell-Foot of Bull Mountain Area" to conform with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as amended. (e) MONTHLY REPORTS - Receive and File Administration Library Building Planning Finance Police 6. PARK BOARD/TIGARD TOWN AND COUNTRY DAYS COMMITTEE - Discussion on Proposed Main Street Park. 7. REPORT ON PARK BOARD CHECKING ACCOUNT (a) Report by City Administrator 8. RESOLUTION No. 76- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENTS FOR TWO UNEXPIRED TERMS TO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (a) Recommendation of Planning Commission 9. APPOINTMENT - C.R.A.G. General Assembly Alternate 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS Commencing at 8:00 P.M. (a) ENGLEWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, Phase III - Council review of Planning Commission action approving the Preliminary Plat for Phase III, Englewood Planned Unit Development at 121st and Scholls Ferry Road within the City of Tigard. Specific con- sideration is in regard to necessity of requiring the developer, Commonwealth Investment Corp. , to improve S.W. 115th from southerly plat boundary to S.W. North Dakota. (1) Public Hearing Opened (2) Statement of Facts by Planning Director (3) Public Testimony (4) Recommendation of Planning Director (5) Consideration by Council t t Page 2 - Council Agenda - April 26, 1976 (b) APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - Michael I. Scherr. .--, Appeal of Planning Commission denial of application for a conditional use permit on the property located at 12760 S.W. Pacific Highway. (1) Public Hearing Opened (2) Statement of Facts by Planning Director (3) Public Testimony (4) Recommendation of Planning Director (5) Consideration by Council 11. ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER f 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON ALL THAT PORTION OF S.W. 69th AVENUE LYING SOUTHERLY OF S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 (a) Recommendation of City Administrator 12. ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 69-76 AND REPEALING ORDINANCE No. 72-64 BY PRESCRIBING A REVISED SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED RATES AND CHARGES FOR TAXICAB SERVICES: PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (a) Recommendation of City Administrator. 13. ORDINANCE No. 76- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SIGN REGULATIONS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS FOR AND REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS. (a) Recommendation of City Administrator 14. WATER BOARD AGREEMENT - regarding street cutting (a) Recommendation. of City Administrator 15. AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD - regarding Hunziker Street Crossing (a) Recommendation of Legal Council 16. AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE CONTRACT WITH B.O.R. FOR COOK PARK DEVELOPMENT PHASE II. (a) Recommendation of City Administrator. 17. TAXPAYER INFORMATION DISCUSSION 18. ACCEPT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT - Commonwealth (a) Recommendation of City Administrator. Page 3 - Council Agenda - April 26, 1976 F 19. , APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM TO CASH BOND ESCROW AGREEMENT - Englewood II Subdivision ? (a) Recommendation of City Administrator r' 20. ACCEPTANCE OF TWO PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PATHWAY LIMITED USE EASEMENTS - Englewood. (a) Recommendation of City Administrator 21. APPROVAL OF SANITARY SEWER CONTRACT AGREEMENT - Eldon R. Branch, 13185 S.W. 115th Avenue. i 2 (a) Recommendation of City Administrator 22. OTHER (a) B.O.R. Applications Status Report a 23. UNCLASSIFIED PERSONNEL DISCUSSION. e 24. ADJOURNMENT i 's t Page 4 - Council Agenda - April 26, 1976 N t � , T I GA R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 26, 1976, 7:30 P..M. 1. ROLL CALLS Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilmen John E. Cook, Alan W. Mickelson, Robert C. Moore, Lynn R. Wakem; R. B. Adams, Chief of Police; J. D. Bailey, Legai Counsel; Richard Bolen, Planning Director; Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator; Doris Hartig, City Recorder; Arline O'Leary, Administrative Assistance. 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS (a) No one desired to speak. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 12 and 13, 1976 (a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Bob Packwood re: Federal Revenue Sharing Les Aucoin re: Federal Revenue Sharing Al Ullman re: Federal Revenue Sharing Coos Bay re: L.C•D.C. Public Utility Commissioner re: Hunziker Street R/R Crossing Casper Bruno re: Taxicab rates H,U.D_ re: H.C,D, Application (a) Motion to receive and file: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 5. SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS: (a) Motion to set the following three public hearings on May 10, 1976 commencing at 8:00 P.M. at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room. Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 2-76) A proposed amendment of the Tigard Zoning Code, amending Chapter 18.20 to include a new zoning classification for 3 dwelling units per acre (R-10). Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 4-76) A proposed amendment of the Tigard Municipal Code, amending Chapter 18, Section 18.12.100 -- yard requirements setbacks -- to make the additional centerline setback of 40 feet required for all of S-W, Walnut Street within the City the same as that required by Washington County (35 feet). Zone Change (ZC 8-75) Request for approval of rezoning of lands within the boundaries of "NPO No. 3 Plan for Derry Dell-Foot of Bull Mountain Area" to conform with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as amended: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 6. MONTHLY REPORTS: Administration Library Building Planning Finance Police (a) Motion to receive and file: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 7. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $21,561.75 (a) Motion to approve: Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 8. RESOLUTION No. 76-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENTS FOR TWO UNEXPIRED TERMS TO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: (a) City Administrator stated the Selection Committee had recommended the following people to the Site Development Plan and Design Review Board: Larry Krause, Alternate Member, Term Expires 3/1/77 William Goldbach, Term Expires 3/1/78 (b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 9. APPOINTMENr - C.R,A.G, General Assembly Alternate Representative (a) City Administrator recommended Council appoint an alternate to fill position vacated by Ralph Barkhurst. (b) Motion to appoint Lynn R. Wakem as alternate representative to C.R.A.G. General Assembly: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10. REPORT ON PARK BOARD CHECKING ACCOUNT. (a) City Administrator synopsized a memorandum relating to the Park Board's disbursal of funds from a private account and stated the Park Blard had taken steps to correct the lack of clarity in handling the funds in question. (b) Motion to accept the memorandum: Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Wakem. (c) Discussion followed and Council stressed the importance of keeping the funds and activities clearly separate from City government. CApproved by unanimous vote of Council. PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 11. PARK BOARD/TIGARD TOWN AND COUNTRY DAYS COMMITTEE - Discussion on Proposed Main Street Park: 1i (a) Mr. George Slawosky, president of the Tigard Town and Country Days Cormittee reported current activities. a ' (b) Mr. Fred Cooper arrived later in the meeting to report the following on the proposed Main Street Park: One third of the proposed site is owned by Payless, one third by City of Tigard and one third by the State of Oregon. Mr. Cooper supplied copies of the landscape proposal submitted by Payless' landscape architect and explained features on the landscape proposal that would be changed. (c) Discussion followed and Council requested more specific information on the project funding and what part the City would be expected to take in the project. Mr. Cooper proposed grant funds and matching furds would be used in the first stages. He further stated the City was expected to furnish some general labor, material and utility cost support, as in the case of the Re-Pac project. The proposal will be submitted to Council when finalized. (d) Council suggested the State might be willing to fund a portion of the project. (e) The Park Board is having a field trip May 11th at 7:30 P.M. to visit Woodard Park, Jack Park and Cook Park. (f) Tigard Park Board has changed meeting date to the fourth Tuesday of every month. 12. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Commencing at 8:10 P.M. (a) ENGLEWOOD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, Phase III - Council review of Planning Commission action approving the Preliminary Plat for Phase III, Englewood Planned Unit Development at 121st and Scholls. Ferry Road within the City of Tigard. Specific consideration is in regard to necessity of requiring the developer, Commonwealth Investment Corp% , to improve S.W. 115th from southerly plat boundary to S.W. Dakota. (1) Public Hearing Opened (2) Planning Director reviewed the facts and history of the development. (3) Public Testimony: Mr. Ernie Platt, Vice President of Commonwealth Mr. Dick Waker, Civil Engineer Mr. Platt stated Commonwealth was willing to cooperate with the City of Tigard, in any way possible, to develop S.W. 115th to S.W. Dakota. He pointed out each property owner pays for the street in front of his home one way or the other but he did not PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 l feel it would be equitable to spread the cost of developing 115th to the Phase III new hgmeowners. Mr. Al Popp, Planning Commissioner, testified in his opinion, when the Planning Commission heard the proposal on Phase III, 3/2/76, they did not understand all the facts and background of the original agreement. He further stated he felt the Planning Commission's approval was in error and recommended the action be reversed, the part of S.W. 115th in question should be developed by Commonwealth before Phase III commences and the cost be spread over phase III of the development. Cross Examination - Council questioned if it was necessary to improve 115th for the success and/or livability of the Englewood Development. The developer indicated that they did not feel it to be absolutely essential to the project, however, it would be desirable to have the access and egress available. (4) Planning Director recommended 115th Street be developed from Englewood Development southerly boundary to SW Dakota Street. He further commented the improvement could be minimal until other property on that portion of 115th was developed and the City could work with Commonwealth to assist them with the development. (5) After lengthy discussion, Council and staff concurred no action should be taken to change condition of requiring improvement of S.W. 115th from the southerly boundary of Englewood Development to S.W. Dakota. (b) Motion to reaffirm the conditions stated in Ordinance No. 73-17: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. It was the consensus of the Council that their intent was to clarify the condition that Phase III shall not be developed until such time as that portion of 115th is improved from the Southerly plat boundary .line to S.W. Dakota Street. (c) APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - Michael I. Scherr. Appeal of Planning Commission denial of application for a conditional use permit on the property located at 12760 S.W. Pacific Highway. Councilman Wakem asked to be excused as he was present at and voted at the Planning Commission hearing on this matter. (1) Public Hearing Opened. (2) Planning Director synopsized background of application and action of the Planning Commission. (3) Proponents - Mr. Jim Sutton, Property Manager (on behalf of Michael I. Scherr, applicant) Mr. Sutton explained the parking facility and further stated he felt it was adequate. He also stated he would stipulate in the lease of the building to Mr. Scherr that one half of the building PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 i a would be used for retail sale of pool tables and above ground swimming pools and the other one half would be limited to use for amusement pool tables. Mr. Sutton estimated the amusement pool table area would be approximately 1200 square feet. Opponents - None Cross Examination - Council questioned the sales of above ground swimming pools pointing out neither sale of swimming pools nor the limit of space to be used for the amusement pool table area had been part of the original application denied by the Planning Commission. (4) Planning Director recommended denial of application, (3) In considering appeal, Council asked Legal Counsel for clarification of the applicants right to change the original request when presenting appeal to L'ouncil. Legal Counsel stated since the amount of space to be used for the amusement pool table area had been verbally set out to Council but not specified on original application and the retail sale of above ground swimming pools had not been included, Council was not considering the original application for conditional use permit denied by the Planning Commission. Legal Counsel further stated the Council can only hear an appeal of that which was denied by the Planning Commission. (d) Motion to deny appeal: Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 13. ORDINANCE No. 76-19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 69-76 AND REPEALING ORDINANCE No. 72-64 BY PRESCRIBING A REVISED SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED RATES AND CHARGES FOR TAXICAB SERVICES; PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (a) City Administrator stated Broadway Cab has a franchise in the City and the fee schedule had been set by City Ordinance. Broadway Cab, represented by Mr. Bruno, has submitted a request to raise the fee. (b) Council, staff and Mr. Bruno discussed the need to raise the fees in Tigard to the same level as those in Portland. (c) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 76-19; Councilman Moore seconded by Councilman Mickelson. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10:30 COUNCIL RECESSED 10:40 COUNCIL RECONVENED PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 14. ORDINANCE No. 76-20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON ALL THAT PORTION OF CS W, PACIFIC HIGHWAY) GTh`-�v; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND) FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. .:�. �y�a� 5, of S- y (Ur.l^E'.{ec7 cc's (a) City Administrator recommended Council approval , /hNP7nc� (b) M;..tion to adopt: Councilman Cook, seconded by Cour._ilman Wakem. � (c) Ci.tty Administrator recommended Counc-il drop e.-re. gency clause from the ordinance. (d) Motion. to amend Ordinance No, '76-20 by deleting the emergency clause; Cour_cilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook. Approved by unanimous vote of Council, Ordinance No. 76-20, as amended, approved by !jr.ani;r.c:uS vote of Council. 15. ORDINANCE No, 76-21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1.6 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SIGN REGULATIONS, PROVIDING FOR PERMITS FOR AND REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS, (a) City Administrator recommended approval. (b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Wake±r., seconded by Ccuncilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 16. WATER BOARD AGREEMENT - Regarding street cutting (a) City Administrator reviewed proposed amendments to the agreement and requested Council concurrence to authorize Mayor and City Recorder to execute on behalf of the City. Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to sign and submit the agreement to the Water Board; Councilman Mccre, seconded by Councilman Waken. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 17. AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD - Regarding Hunziker L,I D. (a) City Attorney recommended Council table the item for consideration at a fut:jr.e meeting. Council concurred. 18. AUTIHORIZATION TO EXECUTE CONTRACT WITH B.O.R. FOR COOK PARK DEVELOPMENT PHASE II (a) City Administrator recommended Council approval to execute contract with B.O.R. for Cook Park Development Phase II. (b) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, seconded by Ccuncilman Moore. ( Approved by unanimous vote of Council. PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 r . 19. TAXPA"ER !NFORM.ATION DISCUSSION (a) Cournil discussed the desirability of compiling an i;.formation sheet regarding the tax base election. (b) Mr tion to assign staff to compile i7-formation sl'_eet for review at the May 3rd study session; Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Apprc:ved by unanimous vote of Council. 20. ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT - Cormor_wealt:h (a) City Administrator recommended Council accept the Sanitary Sewer Easement. (b) Motion to accept; Councilman Waken, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Ccurcii. 21. APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM TO CASH BOND ESCROW AGREEMENT - Englewood II Subdivision (a) City Administrator recommended approval. (b) Motion to approve and to authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to sign agree- ment; Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Cook, Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 22. ACCEPTANCE OF TWO PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PATHWAY LIMITED USE EASEMENTS - Englewood (a) City Adr-ninistrator recommended approval. (b) Motion to accept; Councilman Moore, seconded by Conc_.il.man Cook. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 23. APPROVAL OF SANITARY SEWER CONTRACT AGREEMENT - Eldon R. Branch (a) City Administrator recom,nended C:u7cil approve agreement. (b) Mctien to approve; Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 24. OTHER: (a) B.O.R. APPLICATIONS STATUS REPORT - The City Administrator reported the next advisory committee meeting would be held May 19th at which time he expected the City's applications to be approved and forwarded to the County Commissioners for their action. (b) City Administrator called Council`s attention to the communication from Alexander Paul, in reference to Fun City, Inc. , requesting a public hearing to appeal the decision of the Tigard Planning Commission. (1) Motion to set public hearing for Alexander Paul's appeal to commence at 8:00 P-M, at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room on May 10, 1976; Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Moore, PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 25. UNCLASSIFIED PERSONNEL DISCUSSION (7` (a) City Administrator requested Council determination regarding extension of two employee contracts to non-union employees. (b) Motion to allow non-union members the same extended benefits as the respective contract calls for; Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore. Motion passed by unanimous vote of Council. 26. ADJOURNED: 11.:35 P.M. City Recorder_ ATTEST: Mayor CPAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1976 5b 1 BOB PACKWOOD OREGON RE CEiVED '�1C rieff Ziaiez Zen"fe WASHINGTON.D.C. 20510 APR,* I�fS April 9 , 1976 CITU OF TIPR Mr. Bruce P. Clark City of Tigard Post Office Box 23557 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Thank you for contacting me recently about revenue sharing. I am pleased to be the Senate manager of the President' s proposal to continue general revenue shar- ing. This has been one of the most effective federal programs. It gives people the ability to solve local problems through the government closest to them, with- out looking to a central bureaucracy in Washington, D.C. Almost 39,000 state and local governments receive revenue sharing. From January 1972 to April 1975, Oregon State and local governments received $187 ,076,863 in revenue sharing. These funds have been used to pro- vide public services important to every citizen, in areas including police protection, education, health, transportation, environmental quality, recreation and social services for the poor and aged. The revenue sharing renewal legislation I am .#naging_.would nc ke. sf►verai._#provements in the existing, program. The distribution formula would be changed to provide more money for communities with the lowest personal income and highest taxes. The civil rights provisions would be strengthened. A local government would be required to have a procedure, such as a public hearing, to allow citizens to help decide how revenue sharing funds would be used. The amount of revenue sharing funds would continue to increase by $150 million per year nationally, to help local governments meet rising costs. Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. fi)ar .*co 1 , i_ B B PACRWO D BP:afh { t..__. S bet LES AUCOIN / WASHINGTON.OFFICE: IST DISTRICT.OREGON l�C."Y •".1 tV'+.�[,CL=''1""7 329 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON.D.C. 20318 COMMITTEES: (202)228-0055 �.--QANKING.CURRENCY AND HOUSING Congre�g of the ttiteb otate� DISTRICT OFFICE: MERCHANT MARINE AND 345 UNITED STATES COURT HOUSE FISHERIES �ouze of Repreantatibel PORTLAND,OREGON 97X3 (503)221-2901 Ri ECZIVED WaAffiaton,OX. 20515 CITY OF TIP,alii) April 3, 1976 Mr. Bruce C. Clark, City Administrator City of Tigard P. O. Box 23557 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: I appreciate your letter expressing serious concern about the situation that we face with respect to extension of revenue sharing. As you may know, I initiated a letter last December that was co-signed by 98 Democratic members urging the leadership to bring out a revenue sharing bill early in 1976 to provide state and local governments sufficient time to use this information in their own budget making processes. Despite numerous discussions with my colleagues on the Government Operations Committee, legislation is still being delayed owing to the resistance of a relatively small num- ber of Congressmen in key leadership positions. I do think it's safe to say that revenue sharing will be extended, and that it will be at least at a level equal to that provided this year. It is liL:ely that a cost of living increase will be provided, but that is less certain. Congressman Brooks, Chairman of the Government Operations Committee, has promised to bring an extension bill out of committee for House action early in May. I'm frankly skeptical about whether that schedule can be met. Fortunately, once a bill is brought out -- and I'm nearly certain that one will be -- it will be assured of quick passage and the Senate can be expected to act quickly in turn. Because substantial differences are expected in the House and Senate versions, however, there may be delays in reaching a compromise between the two Houses on the final details. Clark April 8, 1976 Page Two I am frustrated, annoyed, and frankly a little bit disgusted that Congress has delayed so long on this important measure in utter disregard of the effect this delay will have on local units of government. But I can do no more than to continue my strong efforts in hopes that we can, as quickly as possible, enact a revenue sharing extension. I hope you can appreciate the difficulty I have in these efforts, inas- much as I do not serve as a member of the Government Operations Committee. With best wishes, Sincerely, LES AuCOIN Member of Congress LA:reb In AL ULLMAN CHAIRMAN,COMMITTEE ON 2D DisTw�CT,ORE60N WAYS AND MEANS .-. _ JOINT COMMITTEEON INTERNAL REVENUE TAXATION �Cvttg�e�� of tie �t�iteb �tate� y EiVED 30oua of Repressentatibem; ijington,M.C. 20515 April 12, 1976 CITY OFTIGP.R� Mr. Bruce P. Clark P.O. Box 23557 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Thanks very much for your letter on Revenue Sharing and local government financing. I appreciate and share your concern . As you know, I was one of the architects of the Revenue Sharing program and fully support it. At the federal level , we clearly have serious fiscal problems . I believe Mayors and County Commissioners must be aware that if there is a major push for expenditure reductions then revenue sharing is in jeopardy. In the Committee reorganization adopted by the House in 1974, the Committee on Ways and Means lost jurisdiction over Revenue Sharing . However, because of my continuing concern about local government financing, I have been in close contact with Chairman Brooks and other Members of the Government Operations Committee, which now has jurisdiction. Under the rules of the House, spending legislation can not be considered by the full House until after May 15. The Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations and Human Resources will continue to work on this matter in hopes of presenting a bill for full House consideration as soon as the rules allow. As Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, I have introduced several proposals in recent years to provide an alternative to tax exempt bonds as a means of financing State and local government borrowing through taxable bonds. The Committee recently reported a bill that would allow municipalities the choice of subsidized taxable bonds, in hopes of attracting new investors who are seeking relatively safe high yield bonds . It is helpful to know of your thoughts , and I will be following the Committee' s deliberations with keen interest. S ' rely, AU/mms Al Ullm M. . Sb4 C. QTY OF COOS BAY POST OmCE Bo$ ills C006 BAY, OREGON 87420 April 7, 1976 Dear Mayor Bishop: e: repeal of SD 100 :?e, the elected officials of cities and counties: of OreSon, cannot sit idly by while our authority, as well as the power of our citizens' vote, is elimint+teC by SD 100 and the Land Conservation and Development Commission. In November 1975 at the time the League of Oregon Cities' resolution was passed to cooperate with L.C.D.C. it was not readily apparent that L.C.D.C. had the unique judicial and legislativepower sranted by SB 100. The Oregon legislature was the first in U.S. History to give an appointed aency (L.C.D.C.) judicial review and le;islative mower to amend or rewrite the ordinances of city and county elected offi- cials, the direct repmsentstives of Oregon's citizens. We must curb L.C.D.C. 's pccrsrs. At the current League of Oregon Cities' regional meetings while supportin; the need i'or land use planning, we can adopt (1) a resolution supporting the repeal of SB 100 to restore the power of the citizens' vote. (2) a resolution calling for our Sovernor, our le.-is- lc+tors, end our candidates for legislature to pledge themcelvea to a rewrite of SB 100 to restore the responsibility for land use planninZ to the local elected officials, tine citizens' direct representa- tives. Your very t Robert Hale, .Mayor 7City of Coos Bay a RESOLUTION NO. 758 �-- ` CITY t1F TIC,P.RD . A .POSITION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF GRESHAM ON LCDC AND CRAG. We, the City Council, take a public position and address ourselves to the people of the City of Gresham and the State of Oregon. WHEREAS, the City of Gresham, acting by and through its City Council and Planning Ccmtdssien, recognize the public need and necessity for land use planning in our State and local area, and %MUREAS, the 1973 Legislature of our State enacted Senate Bill 100 which has resulted in the establishment of the Land Conservation and Developnent Ccm"sicn and State-wide goals and guidelines, and METTAS, the 1973 Legislature gave legislativa power to the Cclumbia Region Fv.;sociation of Govermnents. in the matters of land use, and VMMAS, in the beginning and subsequent to that legislation, it was recognized by the City of Gresham there were Stats-wide concerns, area-wide concerns and local concerns, and MEPMAS, the City of Gresham, recognizing those assets and the need for a Farternship in that regard, was one of the first cities to pass an ordinance agreeing with that concept, and WHEFa AS, since that action, nim bens of the City Council, the Planning Comnission, and the staff of the City of Gresham have continually provided input to T-CDC.and CRAG in an effort of cooperation, and SAS, at this point in time, it has been recognized by the City Council, the Planning Cannission arra the staff of the City of Gresham that that input is totally disregarded, arra 11ES0IITI'ION N0. 758 - 1. j y 'AS, with that attitude by LCDC and CRAG there can not be a meaningful part-i�p, and YHEFEAS, the attitude of LCDC and CRAG is causing considerable expense to the City, lack of product, and a stifling of orderly growth, NOW TLUMFORE, HE IT rTMLVED, that the official position of the City of Gresham is that the City of Gresham can no longer have a meaningful partner- p with LCDC and CRAG until that attitude changes arra that the City of Gresham will increase its monitoring of LCDC and CRAG actions and should there not be a change in attitude and an opportunity for a realistic i paxternship, the City of Gresham will actively lobby for legislation that will drastically modi t- Senate Rill 100, 1= and CRAG's legislative authority. Adopted -this 6th day of April, 1976. (Signed).. Al Myers MAYCR ATMW: .QJ CITY RDCaF�t RESo2IMai NO. 758 - 2. z, sb � SyEMT O„ DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PORTLAND AREA OFFICE sus IIID,= CASCADE BUILDING,520 S.W.SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 •O1iA30 MSC REGION X t , ECE April 9, 1976 Arcade Plaza Building 3� �-•a �I�© 1321 Second Avenue IN Rcr LY REFER TO: Seattle,Washington 98101 ��u{•? ) 'I Vi CITY OF TIGARD Mr. Bruce P. Clark City Administrator, City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Subject: CDBG Application Invitation This is in response to your preapplication for Metropolitan Discretionary Block Grant Funds which compared well with others received. In our previous correspondence, we indicated we would evaluate and rate the preapplications and inform you of results. We received 7 acceptable pre- applications totaling $2,497,282. On the basis of our review of preapplications as specified in 570.402(c) and the Region X Rating System, we invite you to submit a full application in the amount of $121 ,263 for the activities as proposed in your preapplication: Storm Sewer and Paths Located in Low Income Area 2 Greenburg-Pacific Highway to Tiedeman (2) $ 58,948 Tigard-Main to Tiedeman (4) 57,265 Sub Total 3711-6,213 Comprehensive Housing Stock Survey 5,050 . Total $121 ,263 The earliest and latest dates for submission of your application are June 15 and August 15, 1976. Your application must comply fully with HUD regulations as provided in 570.400 and .402 on HUD forms which will be forwarded to you shortly. Your certifi- cations will require citizens participation among other actions. Changes in your proposed activities will not be approved if they change our rating of your preapplication. Your application rated among the top 9 activities which we expect to be able to fund within the $865,000 available to this office. As a result, if your full 2 application receives acceptable final reviews and meets all requirements, I expect to be able to provide approval of your grant reasonably close to the cited figure for the activity listed. Other storm sewer and path projects which you requested did not rate high enough to permit a full application invitation. If you have further questions, please contact my Community Development staff at 221-2601. Sincerely, i Russell H. Dawson Area Director , i 1 J C- BILLS PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT APRIL 26, 1976 GENERAL FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK Check No. 18782 Petty Cash - Office Supplies expense and Subsistence (10) 2.00 $ 44.63 (12) 37.10 (14) 5.20 (18) .33 18784 Tigard Police Officers - Union Dues (611) 346.00 18785 Division of Cont. Education - Registration & expense Traffic Court Conference (11) 15.00 18787 Oregon Municipal Judges Association - Membership (11) 15.00 18788 State of Oregon - License Suspension (11) 20.00 18789 Richard Bolen - Mileage and Subsistence (14) 36.10 18790 Tigard Employees Association - Payroll Deduction (604) 24.00 18792 Robert Burns - Juror Fee (11) 10.00 18793 Joseph Gehring - Juror Fee (11) 10.00 18794 Rose Parker - Juror Fee (11) 10.00 18795 Eunice Painton - Juror Fee (11) 10.00 18796 Doris Torland - Juror Fee (11) 10.00 18797 Carol Anne Maleta - Juror Fee (11) 10.00 18827 Cascade Microfilm System Inc. - Copies (19) 25.00 18828 J.K. Gill - Chartpak (14) 4.00 18829 Legislative Council Com. - ORS Replacement Parts (12) 80.00 18830 Oregon Blue Print - Mylar Copies (14) 55.00 (19) 54.00 109.00 18831 Portland General Electric - Utilities (18) 545.51 (20) 15.88 561.39 18832 State of Oregon - License Suspension (11) 25.00 18833 Pitney Bowes Rental & Meter Machine (18) 109.50 18835 Headrick Buchdruckerei - Code Book (10) 2.61 18836 Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor & Bailey - Legal fees for March (11) 208.00 (18) 696.00 904.00 18837 Xerox - equipment rental (10) 55.63 (11) 3.82 (12) 59.40 (13) 7.15 (14) 121.76 (19) 11.98 (622) 50.50 310.24 18838 U.S. Bank - Federal Withholding (613) 2,190.50 18839 League of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross (10) 178.72 (12) 63.14 (16) 432.35 (18) 60.00 (616A) 12.56 746.77 18840 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (11) 4.89 (12) 16.52 (13) 21.39 (14) 22.13 (16) 130.12 (16.3) 7.99 203.04 18841 League of Oregon Cities - Kaiser (11) 43.39 (12) 63.26 (13) 161.65 (14) 181.52 (16) 485.52 (16.3) 43.39 (616B) 39.34 1,018.07 18842 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (10) 1.65 (11) .55 (12) 1.10 (13) 1.65 (14) 1.65 (16) 9.90 (16.3) .55 (18) .55 17.60 BD U.S. Bank - Bonds Payroll Deduction (610) 150.00 18843 Petty Cash - Office Expense & Subsistence (10) 14.80 (12) 12.90 (14) 8.60 (18) 4.07 40.37 18844 Maryatt Industries - Laundry (20) 21.50 18845 Oregon Section - I.C.M.A. Registration NW City Managers Assoc. Conf.(12) 44.50 18846 Pargas - Propane (13) 31.85 18847 Rentex - Laundry (18) 26.80 18848 Tigard Furniture - 2 piece sectional (15) 30.00 18849 Tigard Times Publication - Notice of public hearings (10)10.50 (14) 25.55 36.05 18850 Wash. County Dept. of Public Works - Maps (19) 84.00 I -1 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (12) 16.24 (13)• 9.34 25.58 1 , A General Telephone - Utility (18) 305.84 (20) 27.69 333.53 ..;;7 0--c ,. r } -d -Iiit' G _a i a ry CGeneral tFund Total $7,691.63 W.1 U e .C :7 f Bills Payable April 26, 1976 Page 2 SEWER FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK CW No 1883 gue of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross 18840 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (103) 18841 Lea (105) $ 79.94 League of Oregon Cities - Kaiser 23.79 18842 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (103) 3175 Power Rents Inc. - Jack Hammer Rental (106) 91.75 1.92 18851 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell (214) (210) 25.00 10.76 Sewer Fund Total STATE TAX STREET FUND $ '233.16 Check No. U.S. NATIONAL BANK 18782 Petty Cash - Supplies. -... 18790 Union Dues - Payroll Withholding (220) 18831 Portland General Electric - Utility $ 1.50 18838 U. S. Bank - Federal Withholding (604) 36.00 (260) 101.42 18839 League of Oregon Cities - B lue C18840 League of Oregon Cities - Salaryross Continuation.94 (616A) g,14 (613) 502.60 18841 League of Oregon Cities - Kaiser Ins. (103) 91.74 (616B) 8,26 88.08 18842 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (105) 23.79 3844 Casey Tractor &:E ui ment - B 100.00 3846 Ross Island Sand & Gravel - Concrete Parts & Labor (106) 1.93 3847 Tigard Feed & Seed - Garden Hose (240) 211.41 3849 Baltz & Son Co. (220) 19.75 - Parts for Lawn Sweeper (220) 30.60 3851 Ba ggersell Pontiac - Police Vehicles (240) 315.78 18843 Petty Cash - Keys (310P) 9,100.62 18846 Pargas - Propane (220) 18851 Don Thomas Petroleum - Super Shell 2.55 3854 A-Bo (210) 50.05 3858 Willamette Hi-Grade nConcrete g Cook arkConcrete (210) 66.50 (220) 2.03 (220) -___L3.9 5 State Tax Street Fund Total FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK 18782 Petty Cash - Misc. Office & Subsistence 18829 Legislative CouncilCom. - ORS Replacement (16) 18831 Portland General Electric - Utility Parts $ 46.06 18837 Xerox - Equipment Rental (16) 169.59 (21) 17.54 (16) 18.00 18838 U.S. Bank - Federal .Tax Withholding (16) 46.42 18839 League of Oregon Cities - Blue Cross (15) 52.44 (21) 126.28 187,13 18840 League of Oregon Cities - Salary Continuation (15) 7.09 (21) 17.29 (613) 332.80 18842 League of Oregon Cities - Insurance (15) .55 (21) 1.10 178.72 3831 Roger 24.38 3845 DoubledayBook Club cor14nbooks 1.65 3848 Woody Froom Tire Co. - Tires (21) 9.00 3850 (15) 32.50 _ �Wdelman Bros. - Uniforms (16) 197.32 3851 Taggersell Pontiac - Maint, Book (16) 3853 International Assoc. of Chiefs of Police - Police (16) 30.95 BD U.S. Bank - Payroll Withholding Supplies 9.00 ;18843 Petty Cash - Subsistence (110 29'80 18 =6 Pargas - Propane (16) 18.75 1 I Rentex - Laundry (16) 9.70 '18851 Don Thomas Petroleum) 10.80 (16) 7,10 (l6) 313.81 18852 General Telephone - Utility Shell 17,90 3855 Mr, C's Photo Factory _ y (16) 419.41 (15) 23.40 (16) 366.60 °3856 Scott's Auto Service Film & Processing 442.81 3857 Southwest Office Supply��6, Rebuild Transmission & Parts (16) 35.80 PP Y Misc. Office Supplies (16) 263.45 (16) 9.00 Bills Payable April 26, 1976 a Page 3 `tiRAL REVENUE SHARING FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK (cont.) Ch--k No. 3859 Xerox - Equipment Rental (16) 286.85 Federal Revenue Sharing Fund Total $2,908.40 Total Bills Payable: $21,561.75 i i f 4 4 7 Y April 19, 1976 MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: City Administrator� Subject: Monthly Report Significant occurrences this past month include the following: Inflow & Infiltration Program_ - Gelco, the successful bidder, was given a notice to proceed on 4-19-76. During the past 3 weeks, old manholes have been found and uncovered in preparation for this work. Under the contract, Gelco has 10 days in which to commence the project. Manholes are currently being located and uncovered in the Phase II area in anticipation of a work extension to this area. Upon completion, we will have cleaned and sealed approximately 2/3 of the City's oldest sewer lines. Jack Park - The play equipment for Jack Park is undergoing installation during the week of 4-19-76 thus completing our obligations under the 1973 B.O.R. Grant. Police Cars - The two new cars are expected to be delivered to Salem on 4-23-76. As noted previously, these non-lead vehicles will require modifications to the gas tanks and nozzle as well as internal procedures. Labor Negotiations - With the conclusion of formalized negotiations, Council will be asked to make a determination as to whether any or all benefits provided in the contracts will be extended to non-unionized employees. This item is included under the title' of Unclassified Personnel discussion on your 4-26-76 agenda. I do not believe that this can be discussed in executive session. Fire Insurance & Equipment Floater - Staff has been working with Leonard Adams Insurance Company by providing a researched inventory of equipment and its replacement value. They are to provide us with information on alternative deductibles and associated rate schedules in order that Council may make a determination on how much self-insurance we may wish to undertake and how much premium cost we will undertake. Budget - Council should be aware of the following 4 steps which outline steps that need be taken: / (1) Supplemental Budget - Due to the L.C.D.C. Grant, Council needs- to 'adopt a Supplemental Budget & appropriations ordinance. A public hearing on this matter has been set for May 10, 1976. (2) End of Year Transfers - No later than June, Council will need to make several transfers from one account to another to cover areas, such as liability a Page 2 B.P.C. Memorandum i..a insurance, where costs have exceeded anticipated appropriations. (3) Loan - The City definitely needs to take a loan to cover lack of receipts from the Hunziker Street project. (4) 1976-77 Budget - The press of work having deadlines has usurped the time normally reserved for budget preparation. It is anticipated that the 1976-77 budget proposal will be in the hands of the Budget Committee no sooner than May 11th and no later than May 18th. C.E.T.A. Extension - We are advised that Ford has signed a bill which extends C.E.T.A. into the next fiscal year. C.E.T.A. VI, our greatest concern, is purportedly to be extended at least until January, 1977 and may be transitioned out of existence after that date. We are awaiting more detailed information. General Notes - Public Works activities have fallen behind schedule. We are experiencing diifficulty in keeping up with the work load in the field as well as administratively. Both John Hagman and myself find our other work falling behind due to the direction and coordination activities necessitated by the lack of sufficient public works personnel. Bob Dunn, Maintenance Man I, will be out of work with a non-job related broken leg for 4 - 8 weeks. Rick Daniels, our new Associate Planner, will start work the week of 4-19 and will be introduced to Council at the 26th meeting. e t MEMO TO: City Council DATE: April 12, 1976 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Monthly Report March's building activity included permits for 9 signs, 19 single family, 8 residential alter and repair, 1 multi-family, 10 miscellaneous, and 2 demolitions for a total valuation of $880,103. 00. Fees for 40 permits 4,037. 50 Fees for 9 signs 170.00 Plumbing Activity - 36 1,290.00 Mechanical Activity - 17 136.00 Business Licenses - 27 629.21 6,262.71 Sewer Permits - 13 7,150.00 Sewer Inspections - 20 625.00 King City Activity: None s i 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 OOOLnO000U) O0000000o00000,1000000000000000 OOLn 000 C'70000 (3) 00000OOOOt17000C- 000000000Lr) 00000 "D (N OD LOr- c- �r- I'D m00) kO .-IU) 04U70000 [- NN -I --,tM U7 ,-4 �T0M M O117t -1M � c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. O N L- Ln O) L- In tO n C14 -I� LO t4l 0 CO IT (3D N N M n ko m CC) N •rl nLVN0) NNN to totoIYP') L"7to MNtO -P rl ro m NN f-1 uN N mm a) mm m -P4-) 4-) 4-) 4-3 4-) rl ri ra ri r-1 r-I carom to (a co mm m0N0NN U) C0 > > 3 > > > 3 > 3 3 1 1 0 I I I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O .-► a) C a) m m m m m m a) m m m m m m m m m m C m m m m m m m m O O O m C C C C C C C m m m C C UUU •riUUUUUm UUUUUUUU UU .rIUco mromcommUUUmro C C C U c C C C C r-I C C C c C C c C C C _i.) C .-1 r1 r4 ,-I ri ri r-I C C C r-I r•I m m m u m m m m m r-I m m m m m m m m () (1) •,i a) ri r-I ,-I ,-L ri rl r-I m m m ri r-I O -0 ,0 m •0 -0 ,0 O 77 m O •O M O O •0 m -O O 'O ri -0 (1) a) a) a) a) m a) 'O O U a) a) m r-I •ri•ri E -4 •ri •r1 •r1-r-IU C •rl -r-I•r1 •ri 4 -4 •r1 -i C C -r-I -HO -4U C U U U U U qU i -r-I -r-I U U C C C m m m E m m m O m m m m m m m m rn N m CT rn N to E m N 0 W m to to Orn m to N m m O O rn M a) m O a) m a) a) m •r1 •ri m m m m a) m a) m -r-I -r-I a) a) a) a) -r-I •ri •,..1 •r1 -H -H •r1-r-I a] a) m 'r-I -rl •14 •r1 •'-I +) fa H N U u N P N H E M P H N N fa W N N W N P N -O H E m E E E E E E N N 1•+ E E O O N N 0 O ri m •rl co La f•- N H m = N E m W LT 3 > CL r-I m m cn m m m a O_ a) a•,i Ln N c- 4-3 N > > > > > O 0r10 a O. u _ •ri •r1 3•r1 •r1 •ri m 0 O •rl O O O Z U . fa La Ln k H N •.) 4-3 J+) J ro J O T A • • • O +) O >+•I•) 4•) H fa -I-) O 0 0 0 0 ro - 0 U P 'D -1 3 3 mOO1m4-) S O U 3 m m 0 m L..) O m +) 1 •O O F-•0 O m = 2 -O O 'D O fa fa .Y S m m •O J E: "O -0 LT O 'D •0 " to ro • O M O O 0 -0 -0 r-1 r-I .-1 = 3 3 m O fa 61 > H 'D C C •• C C C U O-F) O O O m 0 3 0 •rl U U w fa m m m O O O C U -N •I-) ri O O m m 0 m m m fa O cn 3 0 3 U 3 CTI O co •ri •rf m m (a U U m -,I u) cr) m m O ri.-i CO .-1 r•1 r-I m f4 Z r-I 3 r-I m•-i C 3-Y U- 4- 4.3 E E -+1 Z '-I 4- 3 Z -C ••L = .0 E m JP C m m m f-1 m •r{ C O -r1 •r1 C N C CO L C -0 -0 •0 •r1 = Z = 4-3 = 1-1 •ri C C r-i C 01 O10 01 O 01 E 01 N •ri N .Y N fa N fa O O D U m m •.i (D 43•rl C C C C +) +3 4-) f4 C71-4 U -r-I •ri r-I N •,I •r1 N •r1 •rl •.-I 3•rl O m ro ro m m m O. N fa m m fa fa m N O ro LV N N O "t O 94 O •ri (Ll ro m ro m ¢ =S ••= = = t)F-2, 1== JZ F-SG7Hm O_ O_ L3U F- umE: - L- L- mLTmLT ZSSrL C � S O .tO • . • • . • • • . 333 -3333333333333333333333333333333333333 .O . . . . . . . . . . . . . s N U] N U7 Lf7 L)7 U) U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 Cn Ln cn cn Ln Ln Ln to m cn Ln u) U) U) Ln U) U) Ln Ln U) U7 U) U7 cn U7 cn cn Ln U) u) co m 0mm0000Ln c3 Lr) Or-ILn OOLnu3LnLr) LnOLn 00 O f� mwN -,* m "w LTCtnm MLl-1-ILl- 0 *' dm NO r- M LTL- nnr-I �* �U) rI -- MN7LD -- N 00 �: -0 t0 CMU) ncoC4 u3LDdcO (N0) nr- Lnr- LnntnO1N0 -,P NLn to c,4 *LnLr)d �tn -'ttOL- rOn NN r-I -0 rI000000rlrirlNrirlr-Irlr-I rl .-INNnnn NMr-I N0koQL- Qr-I %-It mmN -j N N N m ri r♦.-I r-1 rl r1 r-1 ri.-i ri ri ri ri r-1 ri ri r4 r-I ri r-4 r4 ri ri r-1 rl r-I.-i ri ri ri • ri r1 ri .--I rl ri .-i ri r-I 3 O r--1 UUUUuU m V U c c c c C C >1 O C m m m m CD m N •rf m E E E E E E m 4-3 E CL 0. 0. a a. o. 0- c •N U m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 c O O m 3 m 0 .-1 -1 14 ri 1-1 ri •0 m • to a) N LT -C .-) •rl O C N E ri m m m m m m c N O m m m m c >. m C m -P-N 4•) N U m +3 O m -C > > > > > > ro C U-C -Cr E E E O -r-I O •ri m -Y m m 0 m•rl E O = > >.=:, :�, +) m m m m 0 m r-I -ri +3 -P 43 O O O 0 -0 4-3 N m C N 7 7 7•r1 r♦ k C m ri ^� F4 .,.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O1-Y-P-1 i •r1•.i S S= lr r♦ ro ri O c ri ro N f-1 k E: i m O m 0 -4 F- F- O E C P fa m E E E ri 0 7 7 m r1 E:+) .i> -P m > U m >. m -P U) C C C C C C•rl-r1 O C cn fn Ln m E E E 3 fa ¢ Q La m C C C C Z•rl J C m O. C c X U •rl•r1 •ri•ri -r-I-r-I C Y T O 0 m m m ¢ m m m mm m m m m Ir m 1 •rl L3 E m m 0 m •-N+) 4.3-V +)4.3 f-t •,I • • • 3 fa c+ 14 C . fa - m m m U .-I O C -N 3 -0 .0 Li. t N L3 ro ro CO CO CO m CO m C J 0 0 0 ro 01 01 LT m +)ri m r") 3 . f-1-O •ri m • O m m t L1 fa fa 4.7 .-i r-I r-I r-I r1 ri 3 41•rl L3 O O O C m 3 > O J m O • 4+ 3 1"7 fa > ri O_ 7 7 C C -0 m m m m m m m r-I m-0 0.0 C C C >. 014.- m r-i � f4 Ln U)cn m E C ro ro ri m -0 -0 O O 0 3 3 7 3 7 3 •ri O-C 0 0 0 "O 0 0 0 CO 0 3•h E •ri . m•rl • • • E m a) m 3 m 7 3 3 m 0 m1—F— F—F— F—F—JUU. —MCOMUJE:1=E: 3=:, ¢Ln333JC700=¢ LnF—O.SF— Lr Ln co Ln J OOOOOOoO 0 OoOOOoOO O o Ci Ci Ci Ci Ci 1�Ci ti 0OOOOI-zrrnO O (1) O CD O N 1D r-1 E) C O C; Y;t; r O •r1 NMn n m 4-) 00 (a 3 ri W6 N a) -N L •-i U C13 to N � a7 t O C (1) O a) a) (1) C a) fa •r1 U U U a) U O 4-) C C C .-•I C 4- •rl m a) 1 a) '-1 -o v vm r-n) -0 r-1 mu) C O •r1 •.-I —f L) C •.-1 a) rn E m m (A Orn 1n +3 -H m a) a) m•r1 •r1 m O a) •rl u a) -1-) 0 • C U 'O 3 U J 3 r-1 3 0 a) = Cr♦ = O 3 •0 3 O a) 3 C U O a) > O U O) rl •.-1 O •r1 Q •r1 r- 4-3 •1.3 4- 3 > >.4.•.•1 C •r1 C C f4 -N N •.-I Gi O U •.•i a) •r1 CO W U O. U (a to .-I (0 r-1 a) (a u7 tom- 3333333 Ql . • • . . U7 to L H (- w Ili, r)10 10 n ko U "0 --zTmm � U7m NQl fa Dr-IN14r♦ d O Mr1 a7 a7 r-1-4 r-1 r-1 •--1 r-1 r-1.-I E I rl C E O N . N () O. > O_ H C a) 1T U E U C L C a) —i C 4-3 O co C O •0 P Q) •r1+) a) O U r-1 O —1 E >.as F- N •.4 -P M U) a) Y •,I N 7 U 14 t4 . W.}.) M a) CO • U a) _ L, 3 $4 ODU m .J -P O Z a) C a) C a) OL C E a)Y+3 O to U O a)•.•I 3•rl f4 Dim mt_7m0zcz FINANCIAL STATEMENT REVENUES Date March .1976 1975-76 CURRENT YEAR TO GENERAL FUND BUDGET MONTH DATE Cash on Hand 7/1/75 S 50,000. $ -0- $ 66,131. 701 Property Taxes - Current 137,446. 8,069. 127,010. 702 Property Taxes - Prior Years 8,444. 1,439. 19,119. 703 Land Sales & Advance Taxes 100. -0- -0- 704 Trailer Tax 100. -0- -0- Revenue From Other Agencies: 712 Cigarette Tax 28,728. 3,566. 23,253. 713 Liquor Tax 78,826. 4,055. 63,746. 717 State Subvention - B.O.R. 36,105. 11,900. 38,167. 718 County Subvention - U.S.A. 26,718. -0- 26,718. 718A County Subvention - R.I.D.E. 100. -0- -0- 718B County Subvention - L.E.A.A. 9,600. 4,289. 9,195. 714 A Hotel/Motel Tax Levy -0- -0- 1,172. Licenses & Permits: 721 Business 30,000. 629. 30,783. 722 Liquor 200. 65. 260. 723 Bicycle 75. 6. 65. 724 Plumbing & Heating 8,500. 1,426. 12,248. . 726 Building 40,000. 4,038. 41,746. ?27 Moving 10. 728 Street Openings 500. -0- 563. 729 Sign 500. 170. 1,240. Fines & Forfeitures: 731 & 734 Court & Indigent Defendants Def. 30,000. 2,011. 18,183. Use of Money &. Pr operty: 742 Telephone Pay Booth 40. 3. 31. 743 Interest 5,000. 109. 2,180. Charges for Current Services: 750.10 Street Sweeping 1,600. 160. 1,165. 750.20 Subdivision - Application Fee 900. 125. 1,230. 750.30 Subdivision - Lighting Revenue 61000. -0- 193. 751 Zoning Adjustments 4,000. 1,060. 6,340. 751.1 Special Police Service 100. • 751.2 Special Inspection Service: 200. -0- -0- -752 Document Sales i,000. 90. 1,082. 5 P.W. Construction Fees 4,500. -0- 391. 757 Sale of Street Signs 800. -0- 238. 758 Library Fines & Fees '29000. 291. 1,734. '. 1975-76 CURRENT YEAR TO BUDGET MONTH DATE Franchise Revenue: 761• P.G.E. $ 46,171. $ 27,834. $ 50,683. 762 N.W. Natural Gas 16,929. -0- 24,201. 763 General 'Telephone Co. 23,457. -0- 25,604. 764 Garbage 6,000. -0- 6,339. 766 . Taxi 60. -0- 60. 767 Pacific Northwest Bell 520. 603. 603. Non-Revenue Receipts: 771 Sale of City Property 200. -0- 300. 775 Unclaimed Property Sale 300. -0- 271. 776 Donation - Library 2,000. 78. 545. 776.1 Donation - Building (Library) 100. -0- -0- 777 Park Development & Maintenance 50. -0- 95. Recovered Expenditures: 783 Admin. Sewer & Road 119000. -0- 11,000. 785 Gas Tax Refund 1,854. =0- 1,619. 787 Nuisance Abatement 100. -0- -0- 787.1 Demolition of Building 500. -0- -0- 788 Other 3,000. 180. 1,569. 788B Street Improvement -. S.W. 115th 57,479. -0- 56,330. 788C Street Improvement - S.W. Hunziker 200,000. -0- -0- 789 Unbonded Assessment 1,200. -0- 1,189. GENERAL FUND TOTAL $883,012.� $ 2 X96: $674.591. SEWER FUND Available Cash 7/1/75 $95,184. $ -0- $108,812. Use of Money & Property: . 743 Interest 10,000. 51.3. 4,887. 744 Unbonded Interest -0- -0- 2. Charges for Current Services: 753 Sewer Connection Fee 21,055. 1,504. 21,239. 754 Monthly Sewer Service 46,500. 1,665. 35,711. 755 Sewer Permit & Inspection 3,665. 435. 3,747. Recovered Expenditures: 788 .Other 6,383. 39. 39. 789 Unbonded Assessment 100. -0- 17. SEWER FUND TOTAL $1828.87. $174.454. C Page 2 - Financial Statement - Revenues - Date March 1976 r _ 1975-76 CURRENT YEAR TO STATE TAR STREET FUND BUDGET MONTH DATE Available Cash 7/1/75 $31,814. $ -0- $ 48,924. Revenue From Other Agencies: 711 State Gas Tax 131,326. 11,536. 96,200. 714 Road Tax -0- 18. 111. Use of Money & Property: 743 Interest 3,000. 291. 2,483. 788 Other 5. -0- -0- STATE TAX STREET FUND TOTAL $1661145. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND Available Cash 7/1/75 $91,573. $ -0- $118,757. 715 Federal Subventions 95,249. -0- 67,79.9. 743 Interest 2,500. 209. 3,536. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND TOTAL $1§2,322. $_ 209. $190.092. BANCROFT BONDS #3,4,5,6,7.8,9,10,11 Unappropriated Cash Balance 7/1/75 E$122,4151 $ -0- $122,415. Assessments 30,000. 4,079. 21,991- 1,991. Interest 11,247. 1,016.. 6,610. Use 'of Money: 743 ' Interest on Investments -0- 602. 5,236. BANCROFT BONDS FUND TOTAL $ 1 2 $ 569-/ $156.252. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS Available Cash 7/1/75 $18,557. $ -0- $- 18,654. Cash from U.S.A. .. 26,612. -0- 25,680. Interest on Investments 300. 86. 837. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FUND TOTAL $45 46 /TOTAL ALL FUND - MARCH, 1976 .388.278. t Page $ - Financial Statement - Revenues Date March, 1976 FINANCIAL STATEMENT EXPENDITURES 1975-76 Mo. March 1976 YEAR TO GENERAL FUND BUDGET CURRENT MM— DATE Mayor & Council $.-9,484. $ 987.59 $ 4,719.12 Municipal Court 25,075. 1,842.85 14,271.37 Administration 38,716. 3,236.23 27,781.70 Building 50,618. 4,256.17 -36,852.66 Planning 54,233. 4,472.65 36,577.91 Library 2,100. -0- 440.95 Police .386,957. 38,270.36 276,430.14 Park & Recreation 189450. -0- 19,812.97 Non-Departmental 59t857. 4,024.38 46,187.78 Engineering 4,965. 444.51 1,377.07 Street Operation & Maintenance 204,448. 520.75 141,325.09 Contingency 28,109. -0- -0- Total General Fund $883,012. $ 58,055.49 $605,776.76 SEWER FUND Sewer Operation & Maintenance $132,878. $ 5,847.50 $ 58,493.79 Sewer Replacement & Expansion 111767. -0- 5,801.82 Contingency 38,242. -0- -0- Total Sewer Fund $1829887. $ 5,847.50 $ 64,295.61 STATE TAX STREET FUND Streets, Police & Parks $144,164. $ 9,881.47 $ 77,469.21 Contingency 21,981. -0- -0- Total State Tax Street Fund $1669145. $ 9,881.47 $ 77,469.21 REVENUE SHARING FUND Library Department $30,106. $ 3,606.17 $ 21,732.28 Police Department 49,204. 4,132.90 32,725.28 Non-Departmental 65,800. 166,10 60,581.39 Finance Department 39,112. 3,514.16 28,004.82 Contingency 5.100. -0- -0- Total Revenue Sharing Fund $189022. $ 11,419.33 $143,043.77 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEBT FUND Bancroft Bonds 3,4,59697,819, 100 11. $41,247. $ 1,295.00 $ 27,071.30 e GENERAL DEBT FUND general Obligation Bonds $459469. $ -o- $ 25,680.00 TOTAL BUDGET $19508,082. $ 86,498.79 $943,336.65 CC r .o O •0 0o N .-a n O N10 1 00 OI co In M00 J 11'1 v N .D P �D .•r P P P P H v1 1 ! aD 0 0 c s a Oi of JP s O ? ! 1 cl, � v} M OO C? 4; 40 W Ci p W 10 In H H N ui i oen en 1 0 ► .-1 N GO �D O N c0 � r Lf! N N O .1 N N HfHJ� .r0 -+a v %D PD P° ^ N J D GD O c0 co 1!1 N n n n M P %D 1+ O cn Vl J O co 1 c0 N 1 .O a0 P1 1; D' N O O .r p q p W W y VJ 04 �q W ,..i If1 J .•r L/1 n n ao .. 1 .� P o � � o � •'Oo N Oj J �D J O O n v q q p q W W W d1 M/ W a n n J O Inrn co, J P1 LAP In P ,nnM N ID 1m'! c" .D 10 W W en p. N In J � O n O O c0 �l P N 1O N � '^ N M s c, Iri P Q 1+1 O c0 s '^ s � h ,D P ON P P O P H .nP.. ,JD J co Q p p Cf N 19 q W q R.. y m P4 G H M D 0i d d c7l m 4O 1 Ute] O to ►� CO 4� 03 N 1 p 1 Z Z � s4 C myy U r j GO co IA rl1ppl w Q yOy' H p�q PI b C►1 b PO to H H G7 H ..1 is +•1 F. +i V U 0 H � c � J LIBRARY RBPORT FOR APRTL 19-23 y Last week was a quiet week. No meetings, just putting books on shelf, t ordering books from state library, and finally after six months putting up the bookshelves that were ordered six months ago. We have rearranged 1 the children's room with the new shelves and added one unit to the reference i department, books neat. 3 This week will be meeting with bSr. Sorg about the back room. giving a speech to County Extension on the County Library Levy- going to the Open House at Town Center- plus our usual duties. We had a small but significent theft. They took the Piggy Bank, a rolls of rebinding tape, twine, knife and punch. Also a wallet was lifted. A report to the police will be made now that we found out just what was s taken. 3 9 i .s` S t 1 i a {{r f 4 i LIBRARY REPORT FOR MARCH 1976 This was the busiest month that we have ever had. Vie .circulated 6,228 books, 130 cassette tapes and 259 magazines. We took in $140.00 in card money and $66.56 in fines. Even though we went to a three week check-out period, the fines are approximately the same. There were five weeks in parch. The first week there was a Library board meeting of the County Network and then the Network Fleeting where we discussed the possibility of promoting a State Aid To Libraries Bill- and just what it should contain. The Network By-Laws were also hashed over and Went back to include some minor revisions. The second week there was the Tigard Library Board meeting and a CE2 employers meeting. At the Board meeting, we discussed the County Levy, the heating for the new room, the possibility of having a counter built for check-out ( a new one would run around ilOOO. for a ready built) and the loan of large-print books from the Forest Grove Library and the Oregon Handicapped. Ne have a special bookcase for roughlJX 50 books. The CE2 meeting discussed the problems that arise in the interview period between employer and student. The third week, besides ehowing the BlueBirds through the library, I spoke to the Rotary Anns about the library and received from them enough money to purchase a second-hand couch for the fiction room and six large print books to start our own collection (58 each). The fourth week was school vacation so there were no meetings. The fifth week made up for it. On Monday there was a Network Library Board !"ieeting where we re-hashed F the State aid Bill. `.;. On Tuesday I represented Washington County at the Clackamas County Library meeting. On Wednesday the PNLA (Pacific Northwest Library Assoc) meeting for just a few representatives was held to discuss solutions to the t 1 ' LIBRARY REPORT FOR MARCH PAGE R t problems dealing with membership and more efficiency in getting the news out ( 'die do not belong as yet because of increased dues). We also talked to the CETA representative that day. Thursday we had two meetings at the Library. The first was the Network meeting. Special guests were the representatives from the State Library, Clackamas and Multnomah Libraries, and the President and Vice-President of the Oregon Library Association. There were 30 people present. The State Aid Bill was further discussed. A Union List of Serials (magazines) combining Wadh Co and Clack Co was passed out. This is the first cooperation effort between the two counties. In the evening the Friends of the Library held their monthly meeting. A demonstration by 'Jean Is Florists was the highlight. The business concerned both the wine party and the BiCentennial Grant that they are trying to get for the library. Friday there was an all day workshop at the Hillsboro Library. Took our CETA person, Karrin "awes, with me. The subjects were the binding of books, displays for the library, and a study of childrens' projects to enhance their reading., There was also a lecture on how to weed books when shelves get too full. 1 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Monthly Report For the period from March 30, 1976 - April 26, 1976 Zoning and Subdivision Administration Zone Changes 3 Conditional Uses 1 Temporary Uses 0 Variances 0 Minor Land Partitions 0 Preliminary Plats 4 Subdivision Variances 1 Site Design & Architectural Review 3 Miscellaneous 2 Ordinance Revisions 3 Sign Code Appeals 1 Comprehensive Plan Revisions 0 Non-Conforming Use Expansions 0 Planning Department Work Schedule All projects are proceeding according to schedule. The LCDC work program will probably commence around the first of June. Staff is currently revising the LCDC work program and budget. This must be accomplished before the first or the funds are dispersed by LCDC. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF� MARCH _ 19 76 DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL AVERAGENUMERICAL STRENGTH STRENGTH DAILY ABSENCE AVERAGE EFFEG_I_IVE STR.ENGIH End of I Same This I Same This 'Last Same this Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Last Last Lase Year Year Year TOTAL PERSONNEL 23 21 8.3 7.7 14.7 i 14.7 13.3 _ CHIEF'S OFFICE 2 2 .5 .7 --1.5 _i _1.3 1.3 SERVICES DIVIS. 6 5 2.7 2.1 3_3 3.7_ PATROL DIVISION 12 8 4.1 _ 2.6 7.9 7.6_ 5.4 TRAFFIC DIVIS. 0 3 0 1.1 _ 0 _ 0 I 1_9 INVEST. SECTION 3 3 1 0 29_0_ 2 1 1.6 FORCE ONE 10 10 3.4 4.3 6.6 6.6 5.7 FORCE TWO 7 6 2.6 1.8 4.4 4.4 4.2 FORCE THREE 6 5 2.3 1.6 3.7 3.7 3.4 CHANGES IN PERSONNEL FDAILY AVERAGE PATROL. STRENGTH 1. Present for duty end of last month 23 This Same Month 1 _ Month I Last Year 2. Recruited during month - -"` 1. Total number field 3. Reinstated during month 0 officers 12 11 Total to account for 24 2. Less Agents Assig- 4. Separations fvom the service: ned to InvestigaL. 0 0 (a) Voluntary resignation 1 3. Average daily abs- ences of field off- (b) Retirement 0 iters owing to: (c) Resigned with charges pending 0 (a) Vacation, susp- ension, days off, (d) Dropped during probation 0 comp. time, etc. 3.7 3.5 (e) Dismissed for cause 0 (b) Sick & Injured .4 .1 (c) Schools, etc. .1 (f) Killed in line of duty 0 (g) Deceased 0 Total average daily 4.1 3.7 absences Total separations -�--- 4. Available for duty 7.9 7.3 Present for duty at end of month 23 paop nne.. CRIMINAL ACTIVITY Offenses THIS SAME MONTH TOTALTOTAL MONTH LAST YEAR I THIS YEAR I LAST YEAR CLASS I 74 67 233 242 _ CLASS II 57 73_ 173 239 ISC, NON-CRIMINAL 355 341 1,059 918 Cases Cleared by Arrest CLASS I 1313 _ 50 52 _ CLASS II'• ( 37 41 � 83117 INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION CASES RECEIVED 112 109 i—T_N 373 _ _ 293_ # CASES CLEARED 33 32 104 r _ 101 # CASES SUSPENDED 56 70 _ _ 168 168_x_ # CASES ASSIGNED 51 42 141 _ 170 Y_ PROPERTY PROPERTY LOSS 5 9x156.8 PROPERTY RECOVERED I 12,860 51 3 119 953 543 3�_� 15�$�4�� __ TRAFFIC & ACCIDENT ACTIVITY ACCIDEIITS 22 27 _ 73 _ _70 INJURIES 7 I _ 8 W _ Y22 _ -_ 21, CITATIONS ISSUED ( 111 I 148 1 309I 410 VEHICLE OPERATION TOTAL MILEAGE 16,315 18,408 _ �( 49,853 � 49,367__ COST PER MILE �- 8,39C 9.O1C ( 9.31C L 8.760 PATROL DIVISION TOTAL HOURS 1,845.0 1 778.9 5,476.4 5,200.1 ____ OBLIGATED HOURS 890.3 891.9 2,929.2 2 748.8_ NON-OBLIGATED HOURS 954.7. 887.0 I 2,547.2 2,451.3 _ SERVICES DIVISION =TOTAL HOURS 822.5 736.0 (_ 2,619.0-�— - 2,353.0 ;TOTAL DISPATCH HOURS 342*0 :27.6 � 1,064.8 947.1 TOTAL TELETYPE HOURS 98.9_ 588,7� 263.3 243.1 CLERICAL DUTIES HOURS 333.9 304.1 1,139. . 1 020.2 POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT CRIME INDEX AND POLICE ACTIVITY TREND (l) (2) (3) (4) _ (5) _ (-6) NUMBER OF OFFENSES I NUMBER OF CLASSIFICATION OFFENSES UNFOUNDED NUMBER OF CLEARED BY ARREST i OFFENSES OF OFFENSES REPORTED OFFENSES ACTUAL THIS M0. H BY (PART I) THIS REPORTED OFFENSES TOTAL ARREST OF JUVENILES MONTH THIS MONTH THIS MONTH ARRES JUVENILES THIS MONTH 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE a. Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter b. Manslaughter by Negligence -- -- 2. FORCIBLE RAPE a. Rape by Force _ - b. Assault to Rape Attempts 3. ROBBERY a. Armed - Any Weapon -- b. Strong Arm - No Weapons - -- — 4. ASSAULT - Total / 6 a. Gun 2 -- b. Knife or .Cutting Instrument c. Other Dangerous Weapon d. Hands, Fists, Feet, etc. - Aggravated e. Other Assaults - Not Aggravated 4 4 1 2 1 1 5. BURGLARY - Total L18/ a. Forcible Entry 13 13 b. Unlawful Entry - No Force 4 4 1 1 1 1 c. Attempted Forcible Entry 1 1 6. LARCENY - THEFT (except Auto Theft) a. 50 and Over in Value 23 23 4 b. Under $50 in Value 25 2 23 2 5 1 7. AUTO THEFT 5 1 4 2 1 2 1 TOTAL 77 3 74 6 13 4 4 SUMMARY OF ARRESTS SUMMARY OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY •WLTS: Male Month Month Year Year Female 0 1976 1975 1976 1975 Total PART 1 74 67 233 2 2 PART II 57 73 173 239 JUV: Male MISC NON-CRIM 1 059 918 Female 1 GRAND TOTAL Total 4 486 481 10465 1,399 POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT i CRIME INDEX AND POLICE ACTIVITY TREND (1) (2) (3) (4) _ (5) (6) OFFENSES UNFOUNDED N�UMBER, OF NUMBER OF OFFENSES NUMBER OF CLASSIFICATIONS REPORTED OFFENSEACTUAL CLEARED BY AR .ST OFFENSES OF OFFENSES THIS REPORTED OFFENSES THIS MQKfHBY (PART II) MONTH THIS MONTH THIS MONTH TOTAL ARREST OF JUVENILES ARR JUVENILES THIS MONTH 8. HARRASSMENT 6 6 _2 9. ARSON 10. FORGERY & COUNTER- FEITING 1 1 2 2 1 — I 1 11. FRAUD 5 5 — 5 12. EMBEZZLEMENT 13. STOLEN PROPERTY: BUYING RECEIVING• POSSESSING 1 —1_ 1.4. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF 26 1 25 3 11 --3 15. WEAPONS: CARRYING, POSSESSING ETC. 16. PROSTITUTION & COMMERCIALIZED VICE 17. SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT 2 AND 6) 18. NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 19. GAMBLING — 20. OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN 21. DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 9 9 9 9 _ 22. LIQUOR LAWS 1 1 8 1 2 23. DRUNKENESS 24. DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 1 L 1 1 1 25. VAGRANCY 26. ALL OTHER OFFENSES EXCEPT TRAFFIC 3 3 1 2 27. SUSPICION 28. CURFEW AND LOITERING 29. RUN AWAYS 4 4 3 3 3 2 TOTAL 58 1 57 29 37 11 13 - SUMMARY OF ARRESTS ADULTS: Male 13 JUVENILES: Male 9 Female 5 Female 2 Total 1 Total 11 Pa a three POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MISCELLANEOUS COMPLAINTS b ACTIVITIES NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER OF NON-CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS REPORTED UNFOUNDED ACTUAL COMP 1_ALNTS THIS MONTH THIS MONTH _ - THIS MONTH__ 8 - --- - ------ ---_8-------- 1. Alarm 2 �i 2. Ambulance/First Aid - -�- 9 9 - --- ------- --- 3. Animal Problem 28 - _ _ 28 4. Assist Agency 31 _ - - -__31 -_ -__ 4 . Assist Citizen 15 _-_�-15 5 5. Check Building -- 3 ------ 3 6. Check Occupant 9 7. Civil Matter _ 12 8. Deliver Message 12 - -- 9 Dog Bite - 18 -�r--- 18 _rwr 10. Disturbance 1 -- 11. Hazard --�� 12__ 12. Juvenile Problem 12 ��__ �___ 7 13. Noise Abated 7__ i 7 14. Person 1 1 15. Standby on Moveout 40 _ _ 40 16 Suspicious Circumstances 1 1 17. Towed Auto7 1 _ 6 18. Traffic Problem 19. Unfounded Call 8 20. Wire Down17 1 "�__ 16 21. Other 5 _ 5 22. Found Property3 Y �3_ 23. Lost Property 68 -68 24. FIR' s 1 1 25. Narcotics Information -" 26. Lewd/Harassment Phune Calls (REFER TO PART 911 CRIMES ---9 27. Traffic Arrest Reports 2s_- 28. Vacation Checks)'p-rowI Checks 28 - ------ '- 3 29. Warrants Sub oenas Summons Served 3 --- 30. Drunk Person s) 31. Family Fights _ 32. Fires 1 1 33. Lost and MissingPersons 1 0 34. Prowlers 35. Suicides and Attempts 36. Suspicious Autos 4 355 TOTALS 359 PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED Type of Property Value of ProperLy Stolen Stolen Recovered rren $ _- A. Cucy, Notes, etc.........••••• ••••• •••• •••' •.•$ 1.020.29- $ 15.00 $ B. Jewelry and Precious Metals...................... - $ CFurs.................................... .. ..... .. ........... 950.00 Clothing. . $ 12.550.00 Locally Stolen•Automobiles... .................. ..$ 12.700.00 F. Miscellaneous.. ................. ........ .... ... .. . ,... ... ..$ 15,765.11- $ MIR - F: 30,435.40 $ 12,860.51 POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT ( VALUE OF PROPERTY STOLEN NUMBER OF VALUE OF CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL PROPERTY STOLEN OFFENSES ROBBERY A. Highway (streets, alleys, etc.)..... .... .......B. Commercial House (except C, D, F).............. C. Gas or Service Station.................... . .... $_--------� D. Chain Store... . .. ............ $— E. Residence (anywhereon premises).... . .......... >F. Bank Bank...........................................G. Miscellaneous.. . .......................... ..... _ $_ TOTAL - ROBBERY $- — -- BURGLARY - BREAKING OR ENTERING A. Residence (dwelling) C.< 396.00 5 1) Night.......................... ............. - 2) Day............................. ............ 40 ---- 3) Unknown.... ............... ...... ... ......... 3 $_ 52 2.54 B. Nonresidence (store, office, etc.) 1) Night... . 7� $ 586.47 ..... ... ... ... 2) Day......... ................................ 3) Unknown. 3.................... ......... __7_3 640.50 3 $ _ _ TOTAL -BURGLARY 18 _ $, 7.025_,L LARCENY - THEFT (except auto, by value) 1OL408.03 A. $50 and over......................... . ......... 24 $__ $ $ 17 293.61 B. 5 to 50......... ..... -- C. Under $5... .... ............... ....... .......... 5 $ 8.25 _ TOTAL - LARCENY 46 - $'— 10.709.89 4 $ 12,700.00 AUTO THEFT.......... - GRAND TOTAL $ 30,435.40 Nature of Larcenses A. Pocket-picking. ............ ................. $ _ B. Purse-snatching........ ..................... $ C. Shoplifting................................. 4 $ 13.41 D. From Autos (except E)....................... 20 6.478.03 E. Auto Parts and Accessories. ......... ..... 7 605.00 F. Bicycles.................................... 4 $ 275.00 G. From Buildings (except C and H).. ........... 4 $ 99.50 H. From any Coin-operated Machine.............. $ I. All Other........................... ........ 7 $ 3.238.95 TOTAL - LARCENIES Automobiles Recovered A. Number Stolen Locally and Recovered Locally............ 2 B. Number Stolen Locally and Recovered by Other Jurisdictions........... 1 ^ Total Locally Stolen Autos Recovered............ ..................... 3 4 D. Number Stolen Out of Town, Recovered Locally........... .......... .... -0- page five t POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT TRAFFIC/ACCIDENT SUMMARY ACCIDENTS THIS MONTH THIS YEAR TO DATE This Year Last Year This Year I Last: Year ACCIDENT TOTAL 22 27 73 _ 70 _ Fatal 0 0 _ 00 Personal --__ Personal In ur 7 8 22 — 21 — ? Property Damage 4 5 12 — _ 12�_ _ Pedestrian 0 0 0 _— 0 — — Hit and Run 5 4 11 —_ ��6 ENFORCEMENT _ TRAFFIC TOTAL 111 148 309412 412 Hazardous Violations 85 102 254 284 Other Violations 26 46 55 _ 1_28 _ Parking 9 49 — — 36 —��_�= 88 DWI 9 12 24 _46_ Hit and Run 0 1 2 _— --1 _--_ Arrests, Citations or Custody at Accidents 12 14 i 43 34 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE REPORT Operational Cost Summary UNIT # 1 11.03 Cents Per. Mile 5 113.62 7.99 MPG UNIT # 2 6.86 Cents Per Mile S 243.82 5.58 MPG UNIT # 3 8.27 Cents Per Mile $ 122.92 6„84 MPG UNIT # 4 6.23 Cents Per Mile $ 300.76 8.44 MPG UNIT # 5 7.67 Cents Per Mile $ 265.57 8.30 MPG UNIT # 6 -26„65 Cents Per Mile $ 224.41 5.78 MPG UNIT # 7 6.71 Cents Per Mile $ 59.93 12.74 MPG UNIT # 8 16.95 Cents Per Mile $ 37.64 11.33 MPG UNIT # Cents Per Mile $ MPG UNIT # Cents Per Mile $ MPG TOTAL OPERATING COST $ 1.368.67 TOTAL MILES TRAVELED 16.315 AVERAGE COST PER MILE 8.39C i page six e t - POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT PATROL DIVISION ACTIVITY TIME ALLOTMENT HOURS QUANTITY General Patrol.... .................••••• 651.0 Traffic Patrol.......................... 151.,2 .- Criminal Investigation.................. 67.1 Accident Investigation.................. 26.2 —_-- - Traffic Enforcement..................... 50.5 ._ Court and Jail.....................°•••• 42.9 Transport Prisoners..................... 17.7 _--_—___ Assist Public.... ............... ........ 32.5 ---------- Assist Other Agencies..............•• ••• 7.6 ------------ Assist Other Officers..................• 48.4 _ Calls Answered........... .. .... ...... ... 98.4 ------------ F.I.R.'s........ ...... ........ . ......... 8.0 Dispatch Duties. ......... ....•••• •••.••• _ 59.8_ Office Duties / Briefing................ 75.8 Report Writing.. ............. ....... ... 1 _97.4 Special Details... 106.0 _— Training...................... .......... 36.0 ----- Patrol Vehicle Service...............•.• 43.6 _ Authorized Breaks....... ......... ...•... 152.5 Vacation Checks...... ............... .... __ -- Vehicle Impound............. ......• •.••• 1.6 Administrative Duties. ...... ....... ..... 70.8 --- - TOTALHOURS..... ... ...... .... 1,845.0 Total Obligated Hours 890.3 Total Non-Obligated Hours 954.7_ page seven POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT PATROL DIVISION Page 2 TRAFFIC Quantitv Hazardous Violations... .. .. --54 Operator License Violations.... .... .... ......... ... ..... .. Y 7 Suspended Violations.. ... .......... ..... .............. .... 10 Vehicle License Violations..................... .... ...... . 15 _ Equipment Violations....... 6 Hit and Run.. ....... ..... . .. D.U.I.L.L.. ... ... ..... ... ....... .... ... ........ .. .. ....... _ 19 Parking Violations................. .. ..I. ... ... ........ .... Y 9 TOTAL CITATIONS..... .. ............ .. ... .... ........ ...... 120 TOTALWARNINGS.. ....... ........ .... . .... ........ ... . ..... 180 CRIMINAL ARRESTS Felony.. ................ ..... ... .. 2 ... .. ............ . .. . ... Misdemeanor / Traffic .. .. . 33 TOTAL... ...... ..................... .. ... ...... ... .. . ...... 35 PREVENTION Open Windows.... .... ......... .. .... ............. ... . ... ... Open Doors.... ...................... ....... ...... ......... 5 Street Lights .... .................... .............. .... .. 1 Suspicious Persons......... ......... . ............... ... 86 Suspicious Vehicles.. ... ...... .. .... .... . .. .... ......... .. 378 Signals Out.... .......... .. .. :.. ........ ............ .... .. 3 Signs Down..... ..................................... ...... 4 Neglected Property.. .......... .. ... . .............. .. ...... 6 Street Defects............. ......... ................ ... ... 8 Dead Animal... . ........................ . . ....... 1 Abandoned Vehicles............ ...... ................ ...... Fires. ............... .................... ......... ... ..... 1 Other Hazards ......................................... .. 22 Vacation Checks........................................... TOTAL...................................... 515 page eight POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT PATROL DIVISION Page 3 — SUSPiC10US SUSPICIAUS OFFICER CITATIONS [IARNI_N(;S_-_ -ARRESTS PERSONSVEHICLES__ MYERS 16 __- U --- ---3--- ------ -- --54------ _KILLION 5 -- ----4---- -17--- -------?------- ---_--------- - }300MER - 10 _— - 42---- ----3---__�__----11------ ----•---59-•------ FEATHERSTON 16 _ _ 3_9_ 5 33 65 _CROCKETT- 25 �- - 47 ----- -- -------- -------?------ ------35------- - -- ----- - - T 38 3 4 7 7 SIRIANNI 18 �- - ---+---- ------�- - -- - ---- ------- ---------- - - - -------- NEWMAN 10 4 j 10 ------ - ------------ JOHNSON q 3 T_.------•---- __ --__��- - _- ------- ----------- •--------------- ------•---------- SGT. NMIAN 1 — 1 1 35 SGT. JENNINGS 6 —_� --9---- -^ 1 �- ----28 -- 39 SGT. WHEELER 2 1 4 PATROL TOTAL 119 180 35 86 378 RESERVES 1it`ti,S _-,MERRILL -•--_--.-T_.-_-----1_-._.__�._�_._____.__-- _.------_____. ___=----3___.._..._-_ 2 48 HESKETH -- - --_- 32 TETERS ---- 80 GILL 2 57 WOMACK - 3 - 1 -- 58._._ HAMMES 40 TUMMONDS ~MILLER -------- ---__- --------------- --__._._.-.--- ----- 22 HAGEDORN 21 SWEET 23 -------------- 45 --- _ -�_ _. __ - ----- ------ ------------- ------- ----- - 0 FISHER -- -- STIMLER 1- - --- ------ - ------- - RESERVE TOTAL 1 6 T ----- _: 5 426. GRAND TOTAi!_- - 120 _ 180 35_---- 92 -----_____L.--- 383 page nine TRAFFIC REPORT Conviction Ratio Citations Officer Issued Guilty— Not Guilr.. Pendin Rati.0 1. CROCKETT 21 13 8 100%-- 2. 00% —____2. WHEELER 5 3 2 100% _ 3. FEATHERSTON 8 1 7 100% __ 4. MYERS 16 7 9 100% 5. SIRIANNI 18 7 1 10 87.57. 6. JOHNSON 11 6 100% 7. NEWMAN 9 4 5 100% 8. KILLION 4 3 1 100%_ 9. — 10. TETERS 1 1 _ -0- 11. — 12. — 13. 14. — - 15. --- 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. TOTALS 93 44 1 48 97.8% ENFORCEMENT INDEX 12.1 POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT INVESTIGATION DIVISION Month MARCH 19 76 Number Cases Total Number Of Received Suspended ssification Number Cases Number Cases Assigned Cases Cleared Arrests Per Case Patrol Invest. Patrol invest, Adult Juv. / PART I / Homicide Ra e Robber Agg. Assault 1 Theft Under 50 26 11 10 2 6 4 2 1 Theft Over $50 23 15 2 9 2 Auto Theft — 4 4 1 1 2 Burglary 16 6 2 9 1 1 PART- 1 TOTALS 69 36 15 20 10 5 2 1 4 / PART I11 Assault. & Related 10 8 2 1 2 1 1 2 Check Offenses 3 1 2 Forgery & Related Weapons Crimes 1 1 1 Sex Offenses Narcotic Offenses Prostitution Liquor Offenses Gambling Offenses Stolen Property Crimes Vandalism 24 11 9 9 1 14 Other Part 1.1 Crimes 5 2 4 1 1 PART I1 TOTALS 43 20 13 3 15 3 1 17 MT I & II TOTALS 112 56 28 .23 25 8 3 21 Total Cases Cleared 33 Total Office Hours 210 Total Training Hours 64 Total Cases Pending Patrol 28 Total. Field Hours 115 Total Court Hours 5� Total Cases Pending Investigation 23 Total Overtime Hours 19 Total Other Hours 0 Total Warrants Issued 3 Total Misdemeanor Arrests 20 Total Cases Presented for Warrant Issuance 3 Total Court Case Heard & Dispositions 1 Investigation Division Commander L. Branstetter, Det. Sgt. page twelve POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT SERVICES DIVISION i DUTIES TIME ALLOTTED Dispatch Duties 342.0 Cards Typed/Filed �_ 96.9 Letters Typed 13.5 Reports Typed 17.9 Special Details 147.0 _r Aid Other Agency/Person --52,3 Teletype Operation 98.9 Handwritten Reports 6.3 Authorized Breaks 47.7 TOTAL HOURS 822.5 page ten MEMORANDUM April 26, 1976 TO: City Council FROM: Bruce Clark SUBJECT: Park Board Checking Account On April 12, 1976, City Council requested that this office review the situation relating to the Park Board's disbursal of funds from a private account. Local budget law requires that all expenditures by a public agency be provided for in an adopted budget detailing revenues and expenditure limits. The definition of a public body includes all subdivisions thereof such as Boards, Commissions, Departments, etc. The Tigard Park and Recreation Board falls under this definition. Therefore, any funds accruing to the Park Board and any expenditures therefrom must be provided for in a legally adopted budget. Members of the Park Board, in conjunction with other citizens have traditionally sponsored a Chicken Bar-B-Q in conjunction with Town and Country Days. A checking account to transact their business was opened several years ago. Proceeds from the chicken sales were traditionally donated to the City for specific Park improvements. The Park Board has a checking account at the U.S. National Bank, a savings account at Lincoln Savings and Loan and have recently opened a- separate•;savings account at Lincoln Savings. The former two accounts are in--the name "Tigard Park Fund". The latter is in the name "Liberty Park Trust Fund" and was opened to provide a separation of monies pledged to match the A.R.B.C. grant. Disbursements of funds from these accounts occurs at regular Park Board meetings. These funds are generated from independent actions of members of the Park Board and not from City sponsored or directed activities. The Park Board has recognized the technical problems relating to these accounts and has determined to create a citizen's committee along the lines of the Tigard Friends of the Library. I see no legal problems with this approach. In conclusion, it appears that there has existed a technical lack of clarity in regard to the funds in question. I can find no intentional violation of law but do feel that the generation and disbursement of these funds should occur in a� situation which is more clearly separate from City government so that the Citizen is not confused and so that credit, good or bad, is laid where it belongs. s ,z IL Ff 14 67 •� _9CP. x t �,,� a` U J •u 1/ r 1. C" page 7 PC Minutes March 2, 1976 restrictions of wall signs. o Motion to table (Sakata) o Seconded (Nicoli) o Motion approved unanimously o (The Commissioners indicated their intent to study the matter further and to place the sign code re- vision on the next agenda). 5.6 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 1-76 (Parking) (Tabled from February 17, 1976) A proposed amendment to the Tigard Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 - Parking - to reflect standards and criteria for off-street parking A. Commission Discussion and Action (continued) o Motion for approval (Goldbach) e o Seconded (Nicoli) i o Approved unanimously 5.7 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCE S 1-76 (Englewood III) A request for preliminary plat approval and a variance of the subdivision code provisions requiring sidewalks on both sides of the street for Englewood III, a proposed third phase subdivision and .development of -the Englewood Planned Development, vicinity of SW 115th and Springwood Dr. Y A. Staff Report: read by Powell. B. Applicant Presentation o Ernie Platt, Vice President of Commonwealth presented testimony in support of the preliminary plat pro- posal and stated he would be willing to participate i in an LID for development of 115th, but would no assume the costs for full street improvements with- i out participation from the other property owners. o Dick Waker, engineer, gave testimony relating to the extension of 115th and explained the exclusion of f the park and school site westerly of 115th from the `, t plat. r page 8 PC Minutes March 2, 1976 it I C. Public Testimony: none 1 D. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL of the preliminary plat on the condition that the developer assure the development of 115th to No. Dakota as required by the City's 1972 Planned Development approval for Englewood. Further, recommending APPROVAL Of the variance for sidewalks. E. Rebuttal o Mr. Waker, representing the applicant, suggested x that an alternative would be to "foreshorten" 115th and provide for the development of that portion of 115th and the portion of 115th south of the site in an LID. F. Commission Discussion and Action o Sakata asked staff about sidewalk variance proposal. o Staff explained the proposal more completely. o Moore stated that Commonwealth should be involved a in the development of 115th, but that he felt they should not bear the entire cost of the improve- ment. o Motion for approval (Ems) as requested, but "fore- shortening" 115th to allow the portion excluded from the plat, as well as that portion of 115th south of 9 the plat, to be developed under an LID. r o Seconded (Nicoli) . S o Motion carried unanimously. 6. PRELIMINARY PLAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 6.1 PRELIMINARY REVIEW ZC 1-76 (Carpenter) Staff pointed out that there was an error in the agenda and that this was not to be a preliminary review as is stated in the agenda, but was to be a request by Gordon Carpenter for a zone map amendment on a site in the vicinity of 11535 SW 98th Avenue from R-7 to A-2 for an apartment development (Wash. Co. tax map 1S1 35C, tax lot 900). A. Staff Report: read by Powell B. Applicant Presentation o Gordon Carpenter, applicant, described his project. { 5 CITY OF dIGARD April 14, 1976 Mr- Ernie Platt Commomrealth Properties 3800 S.W. Cedar Hills Blvd. Suite 225 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Rao S 1-76 (Bnglewood III) Door Mr. Platte Please be advised the Tigard City Council will hold a public hearing on April 26, 1976 at 8#00 P.M. regarding the improvement of SW 115th Avenue from the southerly plat boundary to S.N. North Dakota. The public hearing will be hold at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon. Sincerely, Doris Hartig City Recorder Notes Please sign and return the enclosed co certification of receipt. Tek you of this letter as a Sigdaturo f7 Date .. DH#lea 4 141NU` E-SI f Tigard Planning Commi.ssi on ,C.1 I March 16, 1976 - 7:30 p.m. T,aality Junior High School - lecture room 14650 SW 97-th Ave. , Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M. by Commissioner Popp in the absence of Chai.rrran Porter. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Moore, Ni coli, Popp, Sakata, l-Takem, Goldbach; staff: Bolen and Laws Absent: Porter and Ems 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ''The minutes of 3/2/'16 were approved as read. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: None. 5. PUBLIC IiEARINGS 5.1 CONDITIONAL USE CU 10--76 (Schorr) A request by Michael Scherr for permission to opera Le a billiard parlor and equipment sales establ i-si-nent- at 12.760 SW Pacific; Iiwy. (continued from March 2, 7.976, meeting) . A. Staff Report: read by Bolen - reiteration of the staff findings of the 3/2/76 meeting B. Applicant Presentation: o Mr. Scherr stated -that ine had made a parking lot survey at the hours of 12:00, 3:00 and 6:30 p.m. at which time he stated -that at no t1me wns there fewer than 30 vacant spaces during t.he , e. kda_ys and during the weekend there were a m Lni;rjt.m of' 15 spaces available. o Mr. Jim Sutton, speaking on behalf of Mr. Scherr, pointed out to the Commission that an additional 14 spaces were available on the adjoining tax lot for the proposed use. f C. Public Testimony: None. t D. Staff Recommendation: DENIAL, based on findings staled in the staff recorroner_dation of 3/2/'16. E. Rebuttal: o Sutton stated that with the additional 14 parking l stalls sufficient parking needs would be met for the proposed facility. �._ page 2 . PC Minutes March 16, 1976 F. Commission Discussion and Action: o Nicoli stated that he felt -that staff r:as saying that any owner of -the subject property could not use the site because there would be insufficient parking to meet the off-street parking requirements of the Code. o Sakata stated that the proposed use would generate more parking needs than were available on tine site. o llakem asked staff that, given t'ne 14 additional parkin5- spaces, how much short would off-street parking needs be? o Popp stated -that, upon his obse-.•v;:tion of -this site, he saw that at no time would the ce be a parlki.ng problem and that he could not deny a request based on lack of parking. o Nicoli moved for approval on -tile findin-s that there i•.as a community need, that sufficient parking existed on the site, that no adverse traffic effects would .be created on Pacific IIwy. and that -the applicant had shown that there tirere no other suitable sites available to operate his business. o Seconded (Popp) . o Motion failed by a 4-2 count - Nicoli and Popp, aye; f Sakata, Goldbach, Wakem and Moore, no. o Mr. Scherr vas informed of his right -i:o appeal 'the Planning Commission decision to tie City Council. 5.2 ZONE CI IANGE 7C 8-75 (Nl'0 13) Request for approval of rezoning of lands within the boundaries of NPO #2 Plan for Derry Dell-Foot of Bull Mountain Area, to conform with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as amended. A. Staff Report: read by Bolen. Bolen gave a brief explanation of -the intent of the zoning proposals to bring ]_ands into conformance with the adopted NPO 7#3 land use plan. B. Public Testimony - 1 o Attorney Lou Fasano, speaking on behalf of property o:vner Don Pollock, stated -that his client had not , received notice of the rezoning hearing. t Cf MINUTES Tigard Planning Commission March 2, 1976 - 7:30 p.m. Twality Junior High School - lecture room 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Commissioner Popp in the absence of Chairman Porter. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Dns, Moore, Nicoli., Popp, Sa'iata,' 1•lakem, Goldbach; staff: Powell and Laws 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of February 17, 1976, were approved as read. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: Powell reported the resignations of Coimnissioner Smelser and of Mr. Powell from the planning staff. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU 1.0-76 (Sherr) A request. by Michael Sherr for permission to operate a billiard parlor and equipment sales establishment at 12760 SW Pacific Hwy. (Wash. Co. tax map 2S1 2BD, tax lot 1503) . A. Staff Report: read by Powell. B. Applicant Presentation o Mr. Sherr stated that there was a need in the community for an establishment of the nature he proposed; that his establishment would provide a service needed in the community, particularly to the youths. He stated there were 18 parking spaces in front of his building and those spaces were adequate for their needs. C. Public Testimony: no on appeared. D. Staff Recommendation: 3 DENIAL, based on findings that parking provided was not adequate for the proposed use and that permission of the proposed use would require the Village Square development to fall below -the number of spaces re- quired for each establishment. E. Rebuttal o Mr. .Sherr contended that the 18 parking stalls he had available would be reserved for the use of his establishment. page 2 PC Minutes • March 2, 1976 F. Commission Discussion and Action o Nicoli asked if the present parking would be adequate for the proposed use. o Staff stated that it would, probably, but that week- end operation of the flea market would conflict with the proposed billiard parlor in that their peak operation hours would coincide. o Erns stated he heahadoneverre of seen andeficit ofproblem parkingon that site as availability. o Sakata asked Sherr how much landscaping he was pro- posing, what his hours of operation were, what signing he would use and if he had looked for alter- native sites. o Chairman Popp directed Mr. Sherr to answer. o Sherr responded that his hours of operation would i be 12 noon to midnight, 7 days a week; that he would use the existing signs on the premises; that he had anticipated providing landscaping along the edge of the sidewalk, between tae sidewalk and the parking areas and that he had looked for other areas to lo- i� Cate this establishment. o Moore asked the applicant if he was presently oper- ating a similar -type business. o Sherr responded that he was not presently operating this kind of business. 1 o Sakata stated she did not feel the site was suitable for -the establishment proposed. r o Goldbar_h concurred. o Moore stated he felt the proposed occupancy load would clearly exceed the availability of parking, even if the sites mentioned by the applicant were reserved. ' o Ens stated-that the Commission, he felt, was reaching i beyond what the code required for parking; that there was only a partial conflict of hours of operation and the Commission ought to approve a conditional use subject to annual review. page 3 t PC Minutes • March 2, 1976 i" o Nicoli stated he would be in favor of the proposal provided -the manager of the property allocated areas of parking for each tenant. o Motion (Sakata) for denial based on the inappropri- ateness of the site and the lack of sufficient parking. o Seconded (Moore) . o Motion failed to carry for lack of' a majority.-- Ens, Nicoli and Popp, nays. o Motion (Ems) for -the matter to be moved to a later time on the agenda so that the applicant could count the number of parking spaces on the site and the number of cars there at the present time. o' Motion died for lack of a second. G o Popp-asked if there were nearby areas where parking could be accommodated. o . Staff replied there were not, besides, it wouldn't make any difference. r o Popp suggested staff undertake a study of the park- ing needs of the businesses in that area and report back to the Commission. o Nicoli concurred with Popp's suggestion. o Moore stated that he saw an additional possible problem with respect to pedestrian traffic crossing Pacific Hwy. , particularly young people. o Motion to table mor further consideration (Sakata) , o Seconded (Moore). o Motion carried unanimously. 5.2 CONDPI'IONAL USE PERMIT RENMWAL CU 4-74 (Grafin) A request by Roger Grahn for -reinstatement of a previously granted permission to construct a duplex in an R-7 (single family residential zone) approximately 500 ft. southeast of Ash Avenue (Wash. Co. tax map 2.S1 2DB, tax lot 2300) . A. Staff Report: read by Powell. Staff read a letter from homeowners in Burnham Park in opposition to the proposed use, into the record. Staff Report Tigard Planning Commission March 2, 1976 CU 10-76 Agenda Item 5.1 Conditional Use Permit A request by Michael Scherr for permission to operate a billiard parlor and equipment sales establishment at 12760 S.h'. Pacific Highway. Staff Findings 1. 'Phe site of this proposal is the former plaid pantry convenience grocery at the Village Square "Shopping Center" on S.W. Pacific liay. 2. Land use northeast of the site within the shopping center is a fast foods restaurant, and professional offices adjacent. Most of the "shopping center" is offices with a flea market for an anchor tenant. The adjacent land use southwest of the site is a restaurant (Davidsons' Frostop) 3. Required parking under the present code for Village Square is 53 parking spaces plus 1 for each two employees and 1 for each for each establishment. The number of spaces provided is 59, according to the submitted site plan. Staffs observation of the site indicated that there were fewer spaces available Llian that, clue to a .reorientation of the parking .in the center of the parking lot. Staff also noticed that about 15 of the parking spaces available are illegal because they overlap into the public right-of-way of S.W. McKenzie Street. Confirmation of the lack of adequate parking maybe seen in the fact that the adjacent parking lots of "Southwest Professional Center" are posted to prohibit "unauthorized" parking. Furthermore, during the hours of operation of the Flea Market, there is little or no parking available for any other use. This does not pose r. problem for the professional offices but would be a problem for the billiard parlor. 4. The planning commission has previously considered a conditional use permit application for the Flea Market adjacent this proposed establishment--at that time no particular conditions were placed on the property owner with respect to bringing the parking lot or street approaches into conformance with City code. 5. There are no curbs or sidewalks on S.W. McKenzie Street, in spite of the fact that McKenzie Street is the only access available to the apartments behind the village square property. 6. '.be "sidewalk" on Pacific Highway is simply a continuation of the parking lot, without a bumper strip between the parking spaces and the "sidewalk". page 2 Staff Report - CU 10-76 March 2, 1976 r 7. There is little concession given to site improvement or landscaping on the site. 8. Part of the "parking lot" shown on applicant's site plan and presently in use is in the City street--as a result of which the City is not only committed to maintenance, but also maybe liable for any damages resulting from misuse of that street. Staff Recommendations to be given following public testimony - c i C itr t • F i } x`F s oSI '•v t19 �n�ti 35°5b`• 103LH o 9 n =� / ? -/ /-' tI�\t1 r'1i! 1A3�9t;_� •,E -, 1000 �Q, E P t[\t 5U6 5 ID 4 390 Sr W 139 6 y 1 1200 /// �• T!-•� •�� .o O•W 6.ZZCM, t p y�0 0 6.73CR ti 35 53 E r q.1 3.17CH :6 1.76 CH. 1200 _ tS7 3 ._ C5.101 ob 70,�/^ •� � o �a 0 �. ` / •;O � � / *� 31=53" -10 Zf �� yr'k -l~c• -fes./ ��. �, \ �/t �1 s ♦v� f ✓ A l�1 `x„00 N 11 3.17CH. 1.1a 206666.E �Q 11 1 4. 40 2d 56 S3 `- ti' t 1.70 CH. — 1.70 CN_-_- - 2 S.1-_ _ - t •- 1 ' !/k 'S':di,'SY.,•5:%�W/�1.r•3'a%%e: yY^,��•.,;,i:'!/.mss.. �?Ii;�.,y!.s::;//'��%�y/ia !i'/,i;i ! ".e i i/; i '2 L 7,,.,...,.... .,.... '�f�•... .5'i�Sy.�'?!a:R:..v,....:s//.a a.,:/�.'�F�/r• .:/..:.i,:..:�.,;i.ii,;i3.:<F.�G[S/i/�.i/.�i.;l.i/......G..u;n✓.......,.s....Lii..., -t ...._...,.>L..,. -_ f :Y DIV c X s o 112-0 ��- �•`9�-�..�LAI. erbris„ ' "';� �/90 s,0O 1 �' q w I ''c• Jl. U o •rrJ IN� F� 1;! 11 ?!F +v 1"IU I P L ••L 'O 132A �� 1P �4__' .�J ..o �• I . �i =?0,c4!''`�L. F4C `/ 4 \ y ` i .. ��a •'p./fir /\�• O KI G. . s F € City of Tigard � - Tigard Planning Dept. Tigard, Oregon PROTECT: Conditional Use Permit Arplication Existing Vacant Plaid Pantry Market Converted to Family Billiard And Recreation Center The present building was formerly a convenience mar'_ret. Iti'e propose to use the existing 21100 sq. ft. for both, a retail sales organization enSaged in the sale of billiard equipment and tables and a family billiard and recreation center. The location, access, exposure, parking and nearby businesses and multiple dwelling units are all reasons for requesting the conditional use permit. This conditional use of a C-3 zone should have no conflict with the City of Tigard adopted Comprehensive plan. t The total recreational facilities located within the City of Tigard are w extremely limited. The proximity of other forms of recreation such as the one we propose are in Bcaverton and Portland. Having a function such as this at this location will not only be convenient but will reduce auto travel and congestion. The in and out traffic flow of this proposed business should be of mach longer duration then the previous business thus reducing tha volume. The peak activity would be in the evening after rush hour traffic and weekends. Availability of -this- type of recreation would be especially beneficial to the youth of our community as the grounds will be strictly supervised and , easily accessible, giving them an opportunity to expend their energy in a healthy atmosphere and in an acceptable manner. s As the immediate neighbors are businesses of the type that would benefit i4 from out traffic flow, there will be no adverse affect on them. Other slightly removed neighbors are high density apartments which would benefit t from a close and convenient recreation center. All necessary utilities are existing on the site. Mere will be no need � to increase or change any of these utilities. There will be only a nominal impact if any on public transportation as the type of business we propose is a K local coi--itunity center. In ec ,sclusion a "FfiNILY BILLI�.RD AND RECREfTION Ct Ji R" will greatly contribute to the recreational needs of the Tigard con-,unity providing wholesome, easily accessible, well supervised recreational reeds in a groy*ing co*m,runity i in a climate that needs indoor recreational facilities. f 3 The following are excerpts from meetings pertaining to: ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION: Application be Commonwealth Properties, Inc. .for change of zone classification from Washington County S-R, Suburban Residential to City of Tigard, P-D, Planned residential subdivision. Included within the proposed plan are common greenways, a neighborhood park, and a mixture of single family and multi-family housing i sites. The subject property is located on the S.E. side of -the intersection of S.W. Scholls Ferry Road and S.W. 121st Ave. JUNE 11 , 1973 (tape 1 , side B, approx. location between 100 x; 105) f Dick Bolan stated, "the point is, on 115th, it is outside the projects boundaries - in other words this area down here - needs improving. There are no lots in the subdivision that could be assessed, so what we are saying is, before this portion of the development could be approved, the developer in conjunction with property owners along 115th - in this area down here, will improve 115th. Until that time we (meaning the City) are saying that this phase of the project should be held . " Staff recommendation was for approval of plwn as approved by Planning Commission, with one of the conditions being "portion of Plan Development south of Englewood road shall not be subdivided until such time that S.W. 115th. is brought up to existing City standards. " Motion by Councilman Bergmann to continue the public hearing to June 25, 1973 Council meeting to adopt findings and make a decision, seconded by Councilman Moore. June 25, 1973 (tape 1 , side A, approx. location 50) ORDINANCE 73-17 Planner reviewed conditions (11115th be brought up to City standards before developing area S.W. of 115th. and Englewood") Motion to pass - Councilman Norton voted Nay Second reading set for July 9, 1973 NO DISCUSSION July 9, 1973 (tape 1 , side A, approx. location 55) ORDINANCE 73-17 Second reading Majority approved (3 to 2) NO DISCUSSION